CC Packet 2011 11 28A G E NDA
C H AN H A SSE N C I T Y C O UNC I L
M O NDAY , N O V E M BE R 28, 2011
C H AN H A SSE N M UN I C I P A L B U I L D I N G , 7700 M AR K ET BO U LE VARD
5 :30 P .M . - C I T Y C O UNC I L W O R K SESS I O N , F O UN T A I N C O N F E R E NC E R OO M
N o t e: I f t h e Cit y C o un c il do e s n o t c o m p l e t e t h e w ork s e ss i o n it e m s i n t h e ti m e a ll o tt e d, t h e
r e m a i n i n g it e m s will b e c o n s i d e r e d a f t e r t h e r e g u l ar ag e n da.
A . I m p er v i ous S u rface D i s c uss i on.
B . I rr i g a ti on M e t er F ee D i s c uss i on.
C . T r u t h -i n -T a x a ti on P re s e n t a ti on, 2012 B ud g et
7 :00 P .M . – R E G U L AR M EET I N G , C I T Y C O UNC I L C H A M BE R S
CA LL TO O RD E R (P l e d g e o f A ll e g i a n ce)
P U BL I C ANN O UNC E M E N TS
D . I nv it a ti on t o T ree L i g h ti n g C ere m ony
C O N SE N T A G E NDA
A ll it e m s li s t e d und er t h e C ons e n t A g e nd a are c ons i d ere d t o b e r ou ti n e b y t h e c it y c oun c il a nd
w ill b e c ons i d ere d a s on e m o ti on. Th ere w ill b e no s e p ara t e d i s c uss i on o f t h e s e it e m s. I f
d i s c uss i on i s d e s i re d, t h a t it e m w ill b e re m ov e d fr o m t h e C ons e n t A g e nd a a nd c ons i d ere d
s e p ara t e l y . Cit y c oun c il ac ti on i s b a s e d on t h e s t aff rec o mm e nd a ti on f o r eac h it e m . R efer t o t h e
c oun c il p ac k e t f o r eac h s t aff re po r t .
1. a . A pp r ov a l o f M i nu t e s :
- Cit y C oun c il W o r k S e ss i on M i nu t e s d a t e d N ov e m b er 14, 2011
- Cit y C oun c il S u mm ar y M i nu t e s d a t e d N ov e m b er 14, 2011
- Cit y C oun c il V er b a tim M i nu t e s d a t e d N ov e m b er 14, 2011
R ece i v e C o mmi ss i on M i nu t e s :
- P l a nn i n g C o mmi ss i on S u mm ar y M i nu t e s d a t e d N ov e m b er 1, 2011
- P l a nn i n g C o mmi ss i on V er b a tim M i nu t e s d a t e d N ov e m b er 1, 2011
- P ar k & R ecrea ti on C o mmi ss i on S u mm ar y M i nu t e s d a t e d O c t ob er 25, 2011
- P ar k & R ecrea ti on C o mmi ss i on V er b a tim M i nu t e s d a t e d O c t ob er 25, 2011
b. I te m d e l ete d : A pp r ov e P re limi n ar y l a y ou t o f L y m a n B ou l e v ar d.
P D F c r ea t ed w i t h pd f F a c t o r y P r o t ri a l v e r s i on ww w .pd f f a c t o r y .c om 3
c . T H 5 I m p r ov e m e n t s : A pp r ov e A g ree m e n t w it h Mn DO T t o A c t a s Cit y ’s A g e n t
f o r F e d era l A i d.
d. A pp r ov a l o f N o mi n a ti ons f o r 2011 Env i r on m e n t a l E x ce ll e n ce Aw ar ds.
e . A pp r ov e R e so l u ti on A u t ho r i z i n g C er ti f i ca ti on o f H ook -U p C h ar g e s t o P r op er t y
T a x e s.
V I S I TO R P R ESE N T A T I O NS
L A W E N F O RC E M E N T/F I R E D E P AR T M E N T U P DA TE
2. a . L t . J eff En e vo l d, C ar v er C oun t y S h er i ff’s Off i ce
b. C h i ef J ohn W o l ff , C h a nh a ss e n F i re D e p ar tm e nt
P U BL I C HE AR I N GS
A W ARD O F B I DS
UN F I N I S HE D B U S I N ESS
N E W B U S I N ESS
3. W A L M AR T: R e qu e s t f o r C on ce p t P l a nn e d U n it D e v e l op m e n t (P UD) a pp r ov a l f o r a
c o mm erc i a l d e v e l op m e n t o f a 120,000 squ are-f oo t W a lm ar t S t o re on a pp r o x im a t e l y
14.10 acre s o f l a nd l o ca t e d a t t h e sou t h w e s t c o r n er o f H i g h w a y 5 a nd P o w er s B ou l e v ar d
(1000 P ar k R o a d ). A pp li ca n t: W a lm ar t , c /o K iml e y -H o r n a nd A sso c i a t e s, I n c .
C O UNC I L P R ESE N T A T I O NS
AD M I N I ST RA T I V E P R ESE N T A T I O NS
C O RR ES P O ND E NC E D I S CU SS I ON
AD J O URN M E NT
A c op y o f t h e s t aff re po r t a nd suppo r ti n g do c u m e n t a ti on b e i n g s e n t t o t h e c it y c oun c il w ill b e
a v a il a b l e af t er 2 :00 p.m . on Thu r sd a y . P l ea s e c on t ac t c it y h a ll a t 952 -227 -1100 t o v er i f y t h a t
y ou r it e m h a s no t b ee n d e l e t e d fr o m t h e a g e nd a a n y tim e af t er 2 :00 p.m . on Thu r sd a y .
P D F c r ea t ed w i t h pd f F a c t o r y P r o t ri a l v e r s i on ww w .pd f f a c t o r y .c om 4
GU I D E L I N E S F O R VI S I T O R P RE S E N T A T I ONS
W elc o m e t o t h e Ch a nh a ss e n C it y C o un cil M eeti ng . I n t h e i n te r e s t o f op e n c o mm un icati o n s , t h e Ch a nh a ss e n C it y
C o un cil w i s h e s t o pro v i d e a n oppor t un it y f or t h e p u b lic t o a ddr e ss t h e C it y C o un cil . T h at oppor t un it y i s pro v i d e d at
e v e r y r e gu la r C it y C o un cil m eeti ng d u r i ng V i s it o r P r e s ent a ti o n s .
1. A n y o n e i n d icati ng a d e s i r e t o s p ea k d u r i ng Vi s it or P r e s e n tati o n s w ill b e ac kn o w le d g e d b y t h e M a y or .
W h e n calle d u po n t o s p ea k , s tate y o u r n a m e , a ddr e ss , a n d t op ic . A ll r e m a r k s s h all b e a ddr e ss e d t o t h e C it y
C o un cil a s a w h o le , n o t t o a n y s p eci f ic m e m b e r(s ) or t o a n y p e r s o n w h o i s n o t a m e m b e r o f t h e C it y
C o un cil .
2. I f t h e r e a r e a nu m b e r o f i n d i v i d u al s pr e s e n t t o s p ea k o n t h e s a m e t op ic , p lea s e d e s i gn ate a s po k e s p e r s o n t h at
ca n s u mm a r ize t h e i ss u e .
3. L i m it y o u r c o mm e n t s t o f i v e m i nu te s . A dd iti o n al ti m e m a y b e g r a n te d at t h e d i s c r eti o n o f t h e M a y or . I f
y o u h a v e w r itte n c o mm e n t s , pro v i d e a c op y t o t h e C o un cil .
4. D u r i ng Vi s it or P r e s e n tati o n s , t h e C o un cil a n d s ta ff li s te n t o c o mm e n t s a n d w ill n o t e ng a g e i n d i s c u ss i o n .
C o un cil m e m b e r s or t h e C it y M a n a g e r m a y a s k q u e s ti o n s o f y o u i n ord e r t o g ai n a t h oro ugh un d e r s ta n d i ng
o f y o u r c o n ce r n , s ugg e s ti o n or r e q u e s t .
5. P lea s e b e a w a r e t h at d i s r e s p ect fu l c o mm e n t s or c o mm e n t s o f a p e r s o n al n at u r e , d i r ecte d at a n i n d i v i d u al
eit h e r b y n a m e or i nf e r e n ce , w ill n o t b e all o w e d . P e r s o nn el c o n ce r n s s h o u l d b e d i r ecte d t o t h e C it y
M a n a g e r.
M e m b e r s o f t h e Cit y C o un ci l a nd s o m e s ta ff m e m b e r s m a y g at h e r at Ho u l ihan ’s R e s tau r a nt & Ba r , 530 P o nd Pr o m e n a d e i n C h a nh a ss e n
i mm e di at el y a f t e r t h e m ee tin g f o r a pu r el y s o cia l e v e nt . A ll m e m b e r s o f t h e pub l ic a r e w el c o m e .
P D F c r ea t ed w i t h pd f F a c t o r y P r o t ri a l v e r s i on ww w .pd f f a c t o r y .c om 5
Administration
I
This issue paper will discuss the reasons for limiting the amount of impervious
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TO Todd Gerhardt City Manager
CHMNSEN
exceeded without need for a variance Before going into greater detail the findings
Terry Jeffery Water Resources Coordinator
7700 Market Boulevard DATE November 28 2011 PO Box 147
and an increased likelihood of localized and regional flooding As the volume of
Chanhassen MN 55317
Finance water that would otherwise be conveyed has nowhere to go This results in
Phone 952 227 1140
SUBJ Impervious Surface Issue Paper
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100 This issue paper will discuss the reasons for limiting the amount of impervious Fax 952 227 1110
surface at 25 of the lot area It will also look at the ramifications of allowing
Building Inspections alternative hardcover materials so that the 25 maximum hardcover could be
Phone 952 227 1180 exceeded without need for a variance Before going into greater detail the findings
Fax 952 227 1190 can be summarized as follows
Engineering 1 An increase in hard cover leads to an increase in stormwater infrastructure costs Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170 and an increased likelihood of localized and regional flooding As the volume of
runoff exceeds the capacity of the existing system surcharge conditions result as
Finance water that would otherwise be conveyed has nowhere to go This results in
Phone 952 227 1140 localized flooding To remedy this condition existing infrastructure must be
Fax 952 227 1110 upsized and additional infrastructure must be added at a substantial cost to all
community members Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110 2 An increase in hard cover will result in an increase in overall maintenance cost of
the system Increased sediment delivery reduces the effective life cycle of
Recreation Center detention ponds sump manhole structures and other structural BMPs This
2310 Coulter Boulevard requires additional expense to maintain these BMPs
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404 3 An increase in hardcover leads to an increase in runoff rates and volume This
Planning can contribute to gully erosion and mass soil loss through escarpments It can
Natural Resources also cause other city infrastructure such as sanitary sewer to be at risk
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110 4 An increase in hardcover will lead to a decrease in water quality As hardcover
increases so does delivery of TSS nutrients metals and other pollutants to the Public Works water resources An increase in hardcover also results in an increase in base flow 7901 Park Place
Phone 952 227 1300 water temperature All of these changes are detrimental to fish habitat
Fax 952 227 1310 recreational benefit and general aesthetics of lakes streams wetlands and ponds
Senior Center 5 As there is no way to guarantee that alternative surfaces would be maintained into
Phone 952 227 1125 the future there is no way to be certain that a net increase in hardcover will not
Fax 952 227 1110 result
Web Site 6 On average there are less than two 2 hardcover variances requested per year www ci chanhassen mn us
The majority of these requests is from property owners within the shoreland
district for Chanhassen area lakes and streams and would still therefore fall
under the purview of Chapter 6120 of the Minnesota Rules
Chanhassen is a Community for Life Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 6
Todd Gerhardt
November 28 2011
Page 2 of 9
BACKGROUND
For over 25 years the maximum lot coverage for all structures and paved surfaces has been
limited to 25 in areas zoned single family residential This was in response to drainage and
flooding issues throughout the City
Impervious surface is defined in the Chanhassen City Code as
Impervious surface means any material that substantially reduces or
prevents the infiltration of stormwater It shall include but not be limited
to gravel driveways parking area buildings and structures 20
250
N 200
N
aJ
Cr 150
GJ
100
v
50
M
0
a a4 Oo S r oJ aor a r a oaa 410
a o o a r a a
cJ ea o t any
o 1V
Figure 1 Variances by Type 1990 2010
From 1990 to 2010 there have been 342 variance requests submitted to the City for
consideration Of those 342 requests 32 have been for relief from the 25 maximum hardcover
allowance
These requests have prompted discussion regarding the possibility of allowing the use of
alternative paving materials collectively referred to as pervious paver systems to mitigate some
overage of the hardcover limit While many of these systems have been installed and are
functioning per design these are most commonly located on property owned and maintained by
local government units or commercial properties where a management company is responsible
for maintenance
7
Todd Gerhardt
November 28 2011
Page 3 of 9
The DNR has offered some guidance on the use of permeable pavement systems They
discourage them in general on sites where the 25 is already exceeded On degraded sites
where 25 impervious is already exceeded the retrofitting of permeable pavement systems may be of lesser value 1
ANALYSIS
The intent of the hardcover limit is to minimize if not prevent damage as a result of excessive
runoff It is known that impervious surfaces such as asphalt and concrete result in dramatic
increases in runoff volumes and that this increase can result in erosion problems localized
flooding and basement damage as well as damage to other infrastructure In March of 2003 the
Center for Watershed Protection issued a report summarizing the result of 225 studies relating
stream indicators to impervious surface coverage The results showed that stressed conditions
resulted for streams having between 10 and 25 hardcover and that beyond 25 severe
degradation takes place While the review looked primarily at stream indicators it did show that
25 Shallows 25 Deep
InSbman bddolum
W Impenions
35 Evap mea
W pamoff
20 1 Sbt2lloa 4 15 Deep
b16tmnon Infilkawn
Source Adapted from Amold and Gibbons 1996
36 E apotranspuat
Nr REm ff
21 21 Dee
Inslaaoon ra6lbatan
10 shabr i Deep
Infiltatcn LmSltanoa
Figure 2 Effect of Increase Impervious Cover on Surface Hydrology
phosphorous export to water
bodies increases proportionate to
the amount of hardcover It has
been shown that reservoirs with
over 25 impervious cover
cannot sustain safe drinking water supplies
In addition by increasing the
amount of runoff the amount of
infiltration is decreased thereby
diminishing the amount of
precipitation available for
groundwater recharge Another
benefit is the preservation of
green space which has been
positively correlated to property
values
It was staff s intent to bring a discussion of alternative best management practices that could be
used to allow for a nominal increase in hardcover on residential lots However the more staff
began to consider the issue the less practical an alternative approach seemed The following is a
discussion of the rationale behind limiting hardcover and the inherent limits and restrictions to
increasing hardcover allotments
1 Permeable Pavement Systems in Shoreland Areas A Guidance to Local Government Units DNR Waters St Paul
Minnesota September 10 2003
2 Schueler Tom 2003 Impacts of Impervious Cover on Aquatic Systems Center for Watershed Protection
8
Todd Gerhardt
November 28 2011
Page 4 of 9
EFFECT OF HARDCOVER ON WATER QUALITY
Numerous studies show that the urbanization of a watershed has a pronounced negative impact
on water quality The 1983 US EPA National Urban Runoff Program NURP study indicated
that while there is not a dramatic amount of variability between different urban land uses there is
a significant difference in pollutant concentrations from urban sources to that produced from undeveloped lands 3 These pollutants are commonly divided into the following categories
sediments and floatables pesticides and herbicides organic materials metals hydrocarbons
bacteria and viruses and nutrients The concentration of these pollutants is directly proportional
to the degree of urbanization the more intense the urban development the greater the pollutant concentration within the storm water runoff from the developed area
Of the 1 774 listed impairments to Minnesota waters in 2010 428 or 24 were listed as impaired
for eutrophication This is second only to bioaccumulative toxins such as mercury which is
largely a result of atmospheric deposition rather than surface runoff Lake Susan Lake Riley
and Lotus Lake are all impaired for eutrophication Nutrient concentrations specifically
nitrogen and phosphorus are largely predictive of a water body s trophic status and the amount
of algal biomass produced
This indirectly affects the biological oxygen demand and available oxygen within a water body
This algal biomass production may be filamentous algae or it may be cyanobacteria commonly
referred to as blue green algae Contact with blue green algae can result in skin irritation
irritation of the eyes and ears fever nausea and upper respiratory ailments in humans and animals There is a very strong positive correlation between the eutrophication of a water body
and the urbanization of the watershed
Walker reported cause effect relationships 00 000
linking urban development to lake and
reservoir eutrophication are well 10 000
established Walker goes on to say Urban
watersheds typically export 5 to 20 times as
much phosphorus per unit per year as 000
compared to undeveloped watersheds in a o
region 6
100
Suspended solids are comprised of
phytoplankton and fine soils particulates
such as clay silt and sand These
particulates adversely impact benthic
habitats and can negatively impact fish HOURS DAYS Y ED MONTHS
it 1E
Figure 3 Relational Trends of Freshwater Fish Activity to Turbidity and Time
3 US EPA 1983 Results of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program Volume I Final Report
Water Planning Division Washington DC NTIS Publication No 83 185552 4 United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA 1999 Preliminary Data Summary of Urban Storm Water
Best Management Practices EPA 821 R 99 012 Washington D C 5 Minnesota Department of Health MDH 2011 Blue Green Algal Bloom and Microcystin Site Assessment and
Consultation Unit
6 Walker W W 1987 Phosphorus Removal by Urban Runoff Detention Basins Lake and
Reservoir Management Volume III
9
Todd Gerhardt
November 28 2011
Page 5 of 9
reproduction The fines can smother newly hatched larvae and fill in void spaces that would be
used as habitat by organic organisms The suspended solids also limit light penetration which
adversely impacts emergent and submergent vegetation growth This diminished light
penetration also limits photosynthesis resulting in diminished input of oxygen into the water
column
This input of sediment also acts as a delivery method for other pollutants that bind to these
particles and increases maintenance costs for ponds and other stormwater infrastructure In order
for the wet detention ponds to function appropriately they need the dead storage volume
permanent pool as modeled in the original design Increases in hardcover lead to an increase in
sediment delivery and a decrease in the life cycle of the pond This increase in sediment delivery
also results in an increased frequency at which the sump catch basin manholes must be
maintained
The last major effect urbanization has on water quality to be discussed in this issue paper is its
effect on temperatures of surface water features Water temperature has an impact on several
important measures of water quality Most importantly it affects the solubility of dissolved
gasses Specifically an increase in temperature results in a decrease in the amount of oxygen
and carbon dioxide available for respiration This issue is further compounded by the fact that
metabolism respiration and dissolved oxygen demand are all directly proportional to water
temperature Thus oxygen demand is actually increasing as the available oxygen is decreasing
Not only will this affect the typical flora and fauna of area lakes and streams it could have very
deleterious effects on such cold water regimes as designated trout stream Assumption Creek and
Bluff Creek which may behave more similar to a cold water assemblage of fish
MS4 PERMIT NONDEGRA DA TION PLAN and VOLUME
As part of the City s National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Municipal Separate
Storm Sewer System MS4 Permit we performed a Non Degradation Assessment of the Major
Watersheds within the City Based upon the modeling performed for the City it is estimated that
under current conditions the volume of runoff will increase by 50 between 1990 and 2020
with the majority occurring between 2000 and 2020 Of the 12 major watersheds delineated for
Chanhassen all but two significantly exceed the Nondegradation Volume Management
requirements
7 Newcombe C P and J O T Jensen 1996 Channel suspended sediment and fisheries a synthesis for
quantitative assessment of risk and impact North American Journal of Fisheries Management 16 693 727 8 Malina J F 1996 Chapter 8 Water Quality Water Resources Handbook L W Mays ed
McGraw Hill New York NY
9 California State Water Resources Control Board SWRCB 1963 Water Quality Criteria
Second Edition Publication No 3 A pp 284 285
10
Todd Gerhardt
November 28 2011
Page 6 of 9
WATERSHED 1990 CONDITIONS 2000 CONDITIONS 2020 CONDITIONS
ac ft year ac ft year ac ft year
Chaska Creek 99 118 155
Lake Ann 36 41 64
Lake Lucy 285 347 460
Lake Mitchell 116 193 193
Lake Riley 279 318 483
Lake Susan 713 908 1074
Lotus Lake 668 682 682
Lower MN River 75 76 103
Minnehaha Creek 368 386 429
Rice Marsh Lake 517 567 622
Bluff Creek 1 364 1 731 2 977
TOTALS 4 520 5 367 7 242
Table 1 Surface runoff by target year per watershed measured in acre feet per year
In the above table the 1990 condition represents the flow volume that the City is to achieve
through the implementation of best management practices and planning tools In all cases a
reduction in volume is required In the case of Lake Riley Lake Lucy Lake Susan and Bluff
Creek this target reduction is significant
EXISTING DRAINAGE AND FLOODING ISSUES
Over the last thirty 30 months we have been made aware of more than 70 nuisance areas by
residents pertaining to drainage erosion or flooding All of these issues are intrinsically related
to the amount of runoff Any activities which promote ad y serve to
exacerbate these issues and will result in the creation of n Exposed Sanitary Sewer laints do not
consider gully erosion tributary to area waters such as Riley Creek Bluff Creek and Lotus Lake
These complaints do not consider emergency repairs or capital impr vement projects in response
to volume issues
When a pond and a storm sewer conveyance system
are designed certain assumptions are made One
major assumption pertains to the density of J
development the amount of impervious surface
relative to pervious surface While developers are
required to design to a certain threshold we try to
minimize the extent to which developable land is used
for stormwater treatment and do not have them over
design a pond i e there is not extra capacity within
these ponds Eventually capacity may be exceeded in a
system and the city will need to repair or replace the
system One such project was done in 2008 within the
West Central Lotus Lake Watershed specifically to
address capacity issues at Kerber Boulevard This
included installing several new stormsewer structures
upsizing a half mile of pipe creating a new berm and a
series of ditch checks and restoring a wetland This was
just the first phase in a proposed three phased project
11
Todd Gerhardt
November 28 2011
Page 7 of 9
LIMITATIONS AS A RESULT OF SOIL AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS
Soils in this area were formed from glacial till and have high clay content This tends to result in
more poorly drained soils than would be typical of soils with a higher sand content These soils
which tend to be in the soil hydrologic groups C and D these are poorly drained soils and or
have a shallow water table do not lend readily to infiltration features such as pervious paver
systems It is possible to install them but it would likely require a considerable amount of data
acquisition engineering and soil corrections which would necessitate placing the burden of proof
on individual property owners at a considerable expense
OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES
Even if a property owner were to undertake the upfront due diligence as shown in the attached
plans it could be problematic to assure that 1 the landowner would take steps to assure that
the feature is working per design 2 the landowner would take steps to correct the feature if it
were not functioning properly 3 would undertake long term maintenance for the features and
4 that the feature would stay in place into the future i e that a subsequent landowner would
not replace the pervious system with an impervious system more to their liking
This in turn generates numerous questions How does the City ensure that these features remain
in place and functioning per design Many of the more standard tools easements and escrows
do not seem appropriate for this application Does the City require a Conservation Easement
or Drainage and Utility Easement over a driveway or patio on a private residence Does this
mean that the City would become responsible for the maintenance of infiltration features on
private property Does the City require an escrow that can be drawn upon to make repairs
should the resident not be willing or able to These questions are not unique to Chanhassen
Other city staff are evaluating these same questions and as of yet I have not heard of a city that
has developed a method to adequately address these issues
Staff had also considered the possibility of providing banking credits Upon further discussion it
seemed clear that the administration and management of this program would be daunting This
program also would not be cost effective In order for this program to have any net benefit on
the overall hardcover it would need to be developable land tributary to the conveyance system
and receiving water This land would be prohibitively expensive and would not generate
revenue for the City
The City has gone to considerable lengths to ease any burden that may result from this hardcover
requirement The city does not count pools or retaining walls against the impervious surface
calculations Further wetlands and pond areas do not count against hard surface calculations
even though these features have 100 percent runoff
CONCLUSION
It was the intent of this issue paper to discuss the ramifications of allowing alternative hardcover
materials so that the 25 maximum hardcover could be exceeded without need for a variance
Based upon numerous reasons staff has concluded that the current conditions do not warrant
12
Todd Gerhardt
November 28 2011
Page 8 of 9
additional dispensation for the placement of alternate hardcover Once again these reasons can
be summarized as follows
1 An increase in hard cover leads to an increase in stormwater infrastructure costs and an
increased likelihood of localized and regional flooding As the volume of runoff exceeds
the capacity of the existing system surcharge conditions result as water that would
otherwise be conveyed has nowhere to go This results in localized flooding To remedy
this condition existing infrastructure must be upsized and additional infrastructure must
be added at a substantial cost to all community members
2 An increase in hard cover will result in an increase in overall maintenance cost of the
system Increased sediment delivery reduces the effective life cycle of detention ponds
sump manhole structures and other structural BMPs This requires additional expense to
maintain these BMPs
3 An increase in hardcover leads to an increase in runoff rates and volume This can
contribute to gully erosion and mass soil loss through escarpments It can also cause
other city infrastructure such as sanitary sewer to be at risk
4 An increase in hardcover will lead to a decrease in water quality As hardcover increases
so does delivery of TSS nutrients metals and other pollutants to the water resources An
increase in hardcover also results in an increase in base flow water temperature All of
these changes are detrimental to fish habitat recreational benefit and general aesthetics of
lakes streams wetlands and ponds
5 As there is no way to guarantee that alternative surfaces would be maintained into the
future there is no way to be certain that a net increase in hardcover will not result
6 On average there are less than two 2 hardcover variances requested per year The
majority of these requests is from property owners within the shoreland district for
Chanhassen area lakes and streams and would still therefore fall under the purview of
Chapter 6120 of the Minnesota Rules
Most of these requests came from landowners in those areas fully developed prior to the 1980 s
on smaller lots These are the situations which the variance process was intended for and these
are the situations for which it has worked well The use of pervious pavement systems might be
used as a condition of approval for a variance request to mitigate for the increase but not as a
practice to negate the need for a variance Even in these instances the systems should be
designed and installed by a qualified professional and a long term operations and maintenance
program should be developed and implemented An example of what a typical plan set submittal
might look like is included in the attachments These systems do provide an overall benefit to
surface water management in many applications The use of these systems below the 25
threshold should be encouraged to provide for water quality benefits to area lakes streams
wetlands and ponds The use of these systems should also be encouraged below the 25
threshold to reduce the burden on existing infrastructure thereby reducing operations and
maintenance costs and to minimize future system requirements
13
Todd Gerhardt
November 28 2011
Page 9of9
ATTACHMENTS
1 Exhibit 1 Impervious Surface Coverage
2 Example Mitigation Plan 3
g Xen errylime papenVwdeaverkhardcover issue paper 11282011da
14
j r r
fi
AL
fi t t t
1
gg r
1 L w
y yrr
Y
L 1 r1 i J I
ti
I ar
L I
IL
L 1 7 L
Ind
t
15
REY
MEAF
LANDSCARE DESIGN
F 65 207 8932
Y i v ter Vl 1 1 C i 1 L
0 1jsis aIy 7 l i 1 1 1 M ZZ 1 1 1 i 1
B RYAN
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2
IS
1 1 Up
IME yy I
L03 01
Area Of Drainage
LEAF DESIGN INC
A
14 di
0 4P y I RJ 4aiv S hier o G p @ s y r i v t o w i w 7 i 4 z a oy 0i j v Ri v 3 3 I s w 9 7 i i f v 2h w t le s Gs w s o o r 9 Lf v
1011 111T LE
a
LANDSCARE
VIEW
L03 01
16
PERMEABLE PAVER CALCULATIONS
Area of Drainage
Infiltration Rate of Native Soils
Designed Drawdown Time
Permeable Paver Storage Available
Rain Event Rate
Gallons of Water Generated
Gallons of Water Infiltrated
Gallons of Water Sent Offsite
Garage Floor 2 No 8 Aggregate
Standard 18 Excavation Depth
Overflow water level Permeable Pavers
Overflow Point
CC lild J U l F v J LIi
S
iW 4 No 57 Stone
ND 2 Stone Sob base I I IJ II I II I I II II II I I
Excavation Depth Il Soil Subgrade
141 511 141 611
1 684 sq ft
2 4 in hr per perc test
48 hours maximum
3 375 gal
1 a
1 052 gal
1 052 gal event
0 gal event
1125 Nathan Lane North
Plymouth MN 55441
REY
NEAF
NESIGN
LANDSCAPE DESIGN
0 651 776 4448
F 651 207 8932
A 7033 MONTROSE RD
WOODBURY MN 55125
DESIGNERS
BRYAN D GOFF
DATE
5 28 2010
SCALE 3 3 2 1
CARDINAL DIRECTION
0 2010 GREY LEAF DESIGN INC
ma pen enr potion of iN elan may mn be ow ad repraGred
used wllnpul wnnen Pennivion vd wtlnexad reNe e sgnelure
ary use of ws plan wnlwul meaforem In ed tloc memaupn n a
iaaeon of op law one m y reran n IaepN wos utan of an
end d pnben inv
o
f ti went mat a mrtl Pery tlavm a pwly a ra t ft Gre of Dopy if i mar m raleasetl by ftre mird paMcpntectmp y Leaf eapn Inc to and rdeasa
ER I m occur in me tranwnitiw of a ftNc Iles Grey Leef
Deelpn Iro b nd respo wW for derma damages or expenses
enatp out of uneulMnxetl uae of ma Infomnipn crontnretl in me
lepvmk aloe n voNe rl a nun IRI aaowmN rell t nn ntnl
detign tonditrona n is fin reapenaidllY al 11n ue to verily aY
layout d tremion etw other ral letl im maooe
Thee plane e walabb f ImdeO renew and eve 1a by d
conweanfa ceMrecf e govemmenl egenmea entl ven0ora Doty In
ecwrdancn wM iNa notice
SIGNATURE
DRAWING TITLE
ROSS SECTION
VIEW
L04 00
17
Produced in Partnership with
No Stress Gardening and Landscapes
150 Pioneer Trail Chaska MN 55318
Phone 612 250 2048
Mail nosUess @nostrrssgardening com it REY MEAF
NESIGN
LANDSCAPE DESIGN
0 651 775 4448
F 651 207 8932
A 7033 MONTROSE RD
WOODBURY MN 55125
DESIGNERS
BRYAN D GOFF
DATE
5 28 2010
SCALE 3 32 P
CARDINAL DIRECTION
N
T
0 2010 GREY LEAF DESIGN INC
TNa Plan or eery P of Nla Plan mry nat M coped reP uceC
my veNOUt wniten Pertn svon aM eutiwnzetl relen aiprwture MYu W Nis
In
of pionwilMUtIM y h g d p EocumanlatknIse vlalatian co 11 r law th e y Y re X in IeeBnvaculion of any x aY parew involvee th ewnl Net a Nib pery Oeeirea to
acyuae a rekese W M copyr n II M ralaa by Uq Nib perry conlacEng Grey Leal DeSpn Irw to epuire a copy erlE rNmae
Errors mryocae n tlw irenvnrtan al alecbanc filed Gray Lael
Daagn 1 Isnotreapo u 1 enYdeims EarrlePes or eapeneea arlaln9 Girl of unaula Ged use of IM ini metian canbireC In IM
elacbnnk RNe ReceoI M Nm may Iwl acPUrel rell t ty find Melpn cwwaiona It is I reepondNNy of Ne us to wriFy eY
lgouta ainwna a and an 14 Nlo nwkn
TMw Plena en a eilebk I Im ravlew I evAb by sans
eon ilanla wn4ectm 9ov nm it percwn en0 venEOn oNy in
att e ICa IOM Vea roYCa
SIGNATURE
DRAWING TITLE
GRADING
PLAN
T NUMBER
L06 00
18
0
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
7901 Park Place
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
05 1111 5to i 7 dl1l8lLTl
TO Todd Gerhardt City Manager
FROM Paul Oehme Director of Public Works City Engineer Y e D
DATE November 28 2011 6j
I
SUBJ Seasonal Irrigation Meter Fee Discussion
BACKGROUND
Seasonal irrigation meters are defined as those that are placed in outdoor meter set
assemblies for the purpose of irrigation decorative fountains swimming pools or
other seasonal warm weather uses These differ from other meters in that these
must be removed and stored in a heated environment before the cold weather
months approach to prevent damage from freezing Chanhassen currently has 77
of these unique meter accounts in place In some municipalities the removal and
installation of seasonal meters is done by private independent irrigation
contractors as they are already providing the services of removing the backflow
device RPZ blowing out the system for winter and maintaining the irrigation
system
Below is a comparison of communities that responded to our request for seasonal
meter operation
g eng AMMWg lAf gW@Mlllynl e ItPea PsrqyjQgfpijggj PlanningforTomorrow
City Turn Removal Fee Water Fee City of Charged on off at Charged Comments
Irrigation Curb Meters
Champlin No NA Yes No Irrigation contractors
Owners need to remove the meter then
Chaska Yes No No Yes 25 to PW will pick up meter and store it for
turn on the winter no charge to store or turn
water off
Farmington No NA Yes 70 Charged for turning off and then again
for turning on
Inver Grove Yes No Yes 50 Charged for turning off and then again
Heights for turning on
Lino Lakes No NA Yes No
Oakdale No NA Yes on No fee to turn off turn
Prior Lake Yes No Yes no
Yearly maintenance fee that covers them
Savage No NA Yes 100 turning water on and off would also
cover cost of any repairs
Eagan Yes 50 Yes Charge is for seasonal meter install and
to turn water on
g eng AMMWg lAf gW@Mlllynl e ItPea PsrqyjQgfpijggj PlanningforTomorrow 19
Approximately ten years ago Chanhassen Utility Department staff elected to place
the task of collecting storing and reinstalling seasonal meters on themselves
This was done as a well intentioned gesture of goodwill but the inventory of
seasonal meters continues to grow as does the labor hours need to facilitate this
operation The meters are installed in May and removed in October Annually it
takes approximately 85 hours of Utility Dept labor to manage as well as several
hours of administrational labor to take appointments field calls from customers
etc This year in particular due to the lack of rainfall and unseasonably warm
temperatures we received many calls from customers requesting that they be
allowed to keep their meters past the usual collection time of mid October
Upon review of this increasing labor demand it is the recommendation the
practice be discontinued and the management of seasonal meters be returned
back to the individual account holders to remove the meters on their own
scheduled time The owner would assume all damages to their meters as it is their
purchased property They will also have the benefit of choosing when their meter
is installed and removed dependant on their own needs As previously mentioned
the majority of these systems are already being managed by private irrigation
companies and they are accustomed to this from other cities
The fall of the year is an especially busy time for the Utility department The
department completes the annual flushing of the water system fix any inoperable
gate valves and hydrants that were identified during flushing tune water services
off for property owners leaving for the winter and completing sewer jetting and
seasonal maintenance of lift station By allowing the owner to take responsible
for installing and maintenance of the meter this will free up more time for the
Utility department to complete annual maintenance of the utility system
Utility department staff will still need to be notified to turn the water on and off to
the meter set as this requires a curb box key and by city code Sec 19 18 b must
be done by city staff This gives Utility Dept staff the opportunity to visually
inspect the meter for damage and to verify the serviceability of the meter radio
transmitter
g eng paul memos bkgd ws irrigation meter fee discussion 11281 Ldoc 20
0 C
CITY OF MEMORANDUM CHMNSEN
1700 Market Boulevard TO Mayor and City Council
PO Box 147 i
Chanhassen MN 55317 FROM Greg Sticha Finance Director
Administration
DATE November 28 2011 6
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952 227 1110 SUBJ 2011 Public Budget Meeting Truth in Taxation Hearing for
Fax 952 227 1110
Taxes Payable in 2012
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Preliminary General Fund Budget
Fax 952 227 1190 BACKGROUND
Engineering
Phone 952 227 g Attached is the PowerPoint that will be presented on Monday December 5th at the
Fax 952 227 1170 public budget meeting formerly known as the Truth in Taxation Hearing Staff
Phone 952 227 1400
will be reviewing the PowerPoint presentation with City Council Just a reminder
Finance that this PowerPoint is based on the preliminary levy that was set in September
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110 ATTACHMENTS
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120 1 Public Budget Meeting Power Point
Fax 952 227 1110 2 MVHC Information Sheet
3 Preliminary General Fund Budget
Recreation Center 4 Levy Impact Sheet
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
7901 Park Place
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
f gregs budget 2012 budget budget memo 11 28 1 I docx
Chanhassen is a Community for Life Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 21
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2011
Public Budget Meeting For taxes payable in 2012
22
BUDGET PROCESS
Preliminary budgets submitted by Department
Directors in early July
Budget reviewed by Finance Director and
City Manager in late July
Detailed Budget Meeting held in August
Preliminary Tax Levy Adopted for Truth in Taxation
Statement purposes on September 12
Public budget meeting held on December 5
Budget adoption on December 12
23
EXPENDITURES
General Government
2011
Budget
2012
Budget
Change
from 2011
1 928 500 1 932 700 2
Law Enforcement Fire 3 083 200 3 069 400 5
Public Works 2 244 800 2 271 300 1 2
Community Development 454 900 459 600 1 0
Park Recreation 1 906 200 1 926 300 1 1
Total 9 9 4
24
REVENUES
2011
Budget
2012 Change
Budget from 2011
Property Tax 7 338 200
Licenses Permits 884 700
Intergovernmental Rev 265 000
Charges for Services 643 000
Fines Penalties 131 500
Other Revenue 355 200
Total Revenue 996179600
7 457 200 1 6
852 000 3 7
270 000 1 9
656 700 2 1
127 500 3 0
295 900 16 7
9 4
25
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE HISTORY
9 859 100 9 637 600 9 659 300 10 000 000 9 318 300 5 8 9 5e 400
0 8 0 4
9 000 000
8 000 000
7 000 000
6 000 000
5 000 000
4 000 000
3 000 000
2 000 000
1 000 000
0
7 860 785
i 0
8 307 920
5 7
8 615 100
3 7
9 062 400
5 2
2 8
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
26
WHAT FACTORS CHANGE
THE BUDGET FOR 2012
Most expenditure line items remain flat for
2012
General Fund expenditures increased less
than one percent 4 or 60 200
Wage increases of 1 5 included
Budgeted permit revenue same as 2011
Additional fire department funding of 20 000
27
SALARY INCREASE COMPARISON
Chanhassen 0 1 1 5
Andover 0 0 0
Champlin 0 0 3
Chaska 1 5 1 5 unknown
Inver Grove 1
Heights
Lino Lakes 0 0 2
Oakdale 2
Prior Lake 0 2 5 2 2 5 2
28
TAX CAPACITY MARKET VALUE LEVY CHANGES
Tax Capacity Levies 2011 2012 Chg
7 508 200 7 477 200 4 General Fund
Capital Replacement 750 000 750 000 0 0
MSA Sealcoating 200 000 200 000 0 0
General Obligation Debt 336 800 335 900 3
Audubon Road Improve 256 570 437 842 70 6
Public Works Facility 594 000 593 800 03
EDA Debt 126 420 0 100
Fire Station 3 0 90 000 100
TAX CAPACITY LEVIES 9 771 990 9 884 742 1 2
Market Value Levies 2011 2012 Chg
495 400 351 648 29 0 Library Referendum
MARKET VALUE LEVIES 495 400 351 648 29 0
TOTAL All LEVIES 10 267 390 10 236 390 3
29
TOTAL LEVY VS NEW GROWTH
Total Levy New Growth
4
0 3 0 2 71
2
2
1
0 90
0
1
1
2
2 45
1 38 1 39
1 06 1 16
0 53
0 30
LA
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
30
NET TAX LEVY EFFECTS
General Fund levy decrease of 4
Total tax levy decrease of 31 000 or 3
Change in Market Value Homestead Credit
Program for taxes payable in 2012 City of
Chanhassen levy reduced 150 000 to
help offset the impact of this change
Impact of Market Value Referendum
31
CHANGE IN MARKET VALUE
HOMESTEAD CREDIT PROGRAM
minnesota publicradio org display we
b 2011 10 25 video property taxes
increase
32
EFFECT ON HOMEOWNERS
Below are some examples of how the 2012 levy will impact property owners the average home in Chanhassen dropped
approximately 4 in taxable market value for 2012
1 210 200 182 200 13 3 547 95 543 16 9
2 330 500 307 700 6 9 907 60 914 74 8
3 613 400 589 500 3 9 1 798 54 1 814 72 9
4 845 000 799 800 5 3 2 603 10 2 589 72 5
5 182 600 162 000 11 3 464 66 483 37 4 0
33
ACTUAL P ROPERTY TAX S TATEMENT FOR
PROPOSED 2012 TAXES SCHOOL DISTRICT 112
Property Taxes
5 5
30 4
43 7
County 30 4
School 43 7
City 20 4
Other 5 5
34
KFS BUDGETED EXPENDITURE COMPARISON
Met Council Population Estimate
Minnesota State Auditors Office City Summary Budget Report for 2010 and 2011
Oakdale 27 378 11 549 334 11 447 965 0 88
Chaska 23 770 9 915 9 996 010 0 81
Chanhassen 22 952 9 618 600 9 727 800 1 14
Champlin 23 089 9 554 351 9 965 931 4 31
Lino Lakes 20 216 8 889 255 8 740 353 1 68
Andover 30 598 12 219 037 13 267 414 8 58
Farmington 21 086 10 019 844 9 349 781 6 69
Savage 26 911 11 774 071 11 982 361 1 77
Prior Lake 22 796 10 031 046 10 198 453 1 67
Shoreview 25 043 12 093 196 12 409 115 2 61
Inver Grove Heights 33 880 19 111 100 19 223 500 0 59
Average 25 247 11 343 197 11 482 608 1 11
Met Council Population Estimate
Minnesota State Auditors Office City Summary Budget Report for 2010 and 2011
35
CARVER COUNTY CITIES
BUDGETED EXPENDITURE COMPARISON
Met Council Population Estimate
Minnesota State Auditors Office City Summary Budget Report for 2010 and 2011
Chaska 23 770 9 915 329 9 996 010 0 81
Waconia 1097 4 841 978 4 515 924 6 73
Chanhassen 22 952 9 1 618 600 9 1 727 800 1 14
Carver 3 724 1 7721 1 821 312 2 73
Victoria 71 3 432 388 309 353 5 16
Average 12 116 5 1 212 694 5 223 0 26
Met Council Population Estimate
Minnesota State Auditors Office City Summary Budget Report for 2010 and 2011
36
KFS PER CA SPENDING COMPARISON
Oakdale 418
Chaska 421
Chanhassen 424
Champlin 432
Lino Lakes 432
Andover 434
Farmington 443
Savage 445
Prior Lake 447
Shoreview 496
Inver Grove Heights 567
Average 451
37
CARVER COUNTY CITIES
PER CAPITA SPENDING COMPARISON
Chaska 421
Waconia 422
Chanhassen 424
Carver 489
Victoria 491
Averse 441
38
CARVER COUNTY TAX RATES
Based on Urban Tax Rates
Chaska 23 483 25 691 9 40
Chanhassen 26 602 28 607 7 54
Victoria 37 421 39 935 6 72
Waconia 41 891 43 973 4 97
Watertown 46 296 57 201 23 56
Carver 47 957 52 063 8 56
Norwood Young
America 48 552 69 057 42 23
Mayer 59 472 70 237 18 10
Cologne 61 934 73 770 19 11
New Germany 62 059 76 511 23 29
Hamburg 98 404 131 376 33 51
Average 60 766 17 91
Based on Urban Tax Rates
39
DEBT PER CAPITA
Data collected from published financial reports of each city from the required city indebtedness note
Champlin 161133 090 699 AA
Oakdale 24 115 064 881 Aa3
Lino Lakes 25 171 696 1 245 Aa2
Shoreview 341468 301 11 376 AAA
Chanhassen 35 698 046 1 555 AAA
Prior Lake 37 185 122 1 631 Aa2
Inver Grove Heights 60 990 833 1 800 AA
Andover 60 375 442 1 973 AA
Farmington 42 1361 1 998 Aa3
Chaska 851 3 582 AA
Savage 104 902 639 3 898 AA
Average 47 1 846 625 1
Data collected from published financial reports of each city from the required city indebtedness note
40
DISCUSSION POINTS THAT WILL IMPACT FINAL
LEVY ADOPTION
Capital equipment replacement levy
Review contractual service savings
Fire Station 3 Levy
Staff will meet with city council next week
to finalize the 2012 budget and tax levy
41
IMPORTANT PROPERTY TAX LAW CHANGE
A New Homestead Market Value Exclusion Replaces the Homestead Market Value Credit
The 2011 Legislature repealed the Homestead Residential Market Value Credit and replaced it with
a new program called the Homestead Market Value Exclusion This change is impacting the
property taxes on all homestead and non homestead property for Pay 2012
This credit was calculated as a direct reduction to your property taxes No local government has
the authority to change the laws passed by the legislature
What is a credit What is an exclusion
A credit is a reduction in the amount An exclusion is a reduction in the
of taxes you pay amount of property value subject to tax
Old Law All homesteaded property less than 413 800 in value received a Homestead Residential Market Value Credit
This credit reduced the property taxes billed and was shown on line 4 of the property tax statement mailed in March of
each year
New Law All homesteaded property less than 413 800 in value will receive a Homestead Market Value Exclusion This
value exclusion will be identified on the valuation notices mailed in March of each year The taxable value listed on your Proposed Property Tax Statement has been reduced by the amount of the homestead exclusion
Wxy is ms state i aw came Result m nixex taxes
State money is no longer reducing your property taxes By eliminating the credit the state saves 260
million dollars per year This was one cost saving measure the state used to help close the S5 billion two year state
budget deficit
Additional Information for Homeowners
Affected homeowners with household incomes below 100 780 or whose property taxes increase by more than 12 or
100 whichever is greater may qualify for the state s property tax refund and if qualified will be eligible for all or a
portion of the increase to be refunded
The form to apply for the state s property tax refund in the M1PR available at
http taxes state mn us pages current forms aspx
Old Law
Estimated
Market Value
Old Law
Taxable
Market Value
Old Credit Law
Property Tax
Reduction
aw
Market
ue
New Law
Taxable Market Value
With Value Exclusion
New Law
Property Tax
Reduction
76 000 76 000 304 00 76 000 F 150 000 45 600 0
150 000 150 000 237 40 126 300 0
250 000 250 000 147 40 250 000 235 300 0
350 000 350 000 57 40 350 000 344 300 0
400 000 400 000 12 40 400 000 398 800 0
425 000 425 000 425 000 425 000 0
Wxy is ms state i aw came Result m nixex taxes
State money is no longer reducing your property taxes By eliminating the credit the state saves 260
million dollars per year This was one cost saving measure the state used to help close the S5 billion two year state
budget deficit
Additional Information for Homeowners
Affected homeowners with household incomes below 100 780 or whose property taxes increase by more than 12 or
100 whichever is greater may qualify for the state s property tax refund and if qualified will be eligible for all or a
portion of the increase to be refunded
The form to apply for the state s property tax refund in the M1PR available at
http taxes state mn us pages current forms aspx
42
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
Expenditures
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
1110 Legislative
1120 Administration
1130 Finance
1140 Legal
1150 Property Assessment
1160 MIS
1170 City Hall
1180 Elections
1190 Library Building
TOTAL
LAW ENFORCEMENT
1210 Police Administration
1220 Fire Prevention Admin
1250 Code Enforcement
1260 Community Service
1550
TOTAL
PUBLIC WORKS
1310 Engineering
1320 Street Maintenance
1350 Street Lighting Signals
1370 City Garage
1550
TOTAL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
1410 Planning Commission
1420 Planning Administration
1430 Senior Commission
TOTAL
PARK RECREATION
1510 Park Rec Commission
1520 Park Rec Administration
1530 Recreation Center
1540 Lake Ann Park Operations
1550 Park Maintenance
1560 Senior Citizens Center
1600 Recreation Programs
1700 Self Supporting Programs
1800 Recreation Sports
TOTAL
Total Operational Expenditures
Transfer for Roads
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
Personal Materials Contractual Capital 2012 2011 2010
Services Supplies Services Outlay Total Total Change Actual
32 300 100 68 800 101 200 108 300 6 56 99 774
407 900 500 66 600 475 000 466 000 1 93 464 177
231 800 200 47 800 200 280 000 281 600 0 57 270 019
145 000 145 000 142 000 2 11 142 333
112 600 112 600 112 100 0 45 111 432
179 500 1 900 75 500 256 900 254 600 0 90 237 908
72 800 42 300 292 700 407 800 408 400 0 15 399 437
22 500 9 600 32 100 28 200 13 83 42 295
3 000 119 100 122 100 127 300 4 08 113 803
946 800 48 000 937 700 200 1 932 700 1 928 500 0 22 1 881 179
80 900 1 538 000 1 618 900 1 654 900 2 18 1 585 423
515 000 45 600 202 000 762 600 745 800 2 25 716 057
590 700 5 100 16 300 612 100 608 300 0 62 599 693
59 500 4 500 11 800 75 800 74 200 2 16 71 823
1 246 100 55 200 1 768 100 3 069 400 3 083 200 0 45 2 972 996
549 700 1 300 30 600 581 600 573 000 1 50 542 971
663 500 139 600 29 700 832 800 823 400 1 14 851 568
2 000 337 900 339 900 345 400 1 59 317 578
267 000 159 400 86 100 4 500 517 000 503 000 2 78 473 988
1 480 200 302 300 484 300 4 500 2 271 300 2 244 800 1 18 2 186 104
200 4 000 4 200 4 200 0 00 2 928
410 500 400 12 000 422 900 418 400 1 08 390 600
22 800 9 700 32 500
459 600
32 300
454 900
0 62
1 03
30 841
424 369 433 300 600 25 700
200 2 600 2 800 2 200 27 27 2 526
129 700 600 7 400 137 700 137 300 0 29 134 139
213 000 46 200 85 100 344 300 353 900 2 71 308 610
8 700 7 200 45 900 61 800 62 100 0 48 53 102
749 000 79 900 90 300 4 000 923 200 898 300 2 77 928 882
45 400 3 300 21 000 69 700 69 000 1 01 69 111
173 700 19 100 94 700 287 500 282 000 1 95 274 330
32 900 7 700 37 000 77 600 82 000 5 37 61 864
13 200 8 500 21 700 19 400 11 86 21 780
1 365 600 172 700 384 000 4 000 1 926 300 1 906 200 1 05 1 854 343
5 472 000 578 800 3 599 800 8 700 9 659 300 9 617 600 0 43 9 318 991
9 659 300 1 9 617 600 1 0 43 1 9 318 991
43
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
REVENUE
101 General Fund
2010 2011 2011 2012
4CCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET
GENERAL PROPERTY TAX
Inc Over
PY Budget
3010 Current Property Tax 7 097 455 7 508 200 7 508 200 7 477 200 0 4
3002 Allowance for Delinquent Taxes 300 000 300 000 200 000
Dog Cat Impound
3011 Delinquent Property Tax 210 523 130 000 130 000 180 000
175
3041 MVHC
131 500
3090 Other Property Taxes
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
3500 Local Government Aid
3509
TOTAL GENERAL PROPERTY TAX 7 307 978 7 338 200 7 338 200 7 457 200 1 6
LICENSES
90 000 90 000 100 000
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REV 277 513
3203 Dog Kennel 619 800 800 800
3205 Dog or Cat 9 169
3213 Solicitor 950 700 700 1 000
3226 Liquor On and Off Sale 95 954 90 000 90 000 90 000
3230 Rental Housing Licenses 12 450 34 000 34 000
3284 Rubbish 4 200 3 000 3 000 4 000
TOTAL LICENSES 123 342 128 500 128 500 95 800 25 4
PERMITS
3301 Building 480 125 380 000 380 000 380 000
3302 Plan Check 240 028 180 000 180 000 180 000
3305 Heating A C 101 549 80 000 80 000 80 000
3306 Plumbing 60 579 65 000 65 000 65 000
3307 Trenching 40 012 25 000 25 000 30 000
3308 Gun 1 320 1 400 1 400 1 400
3309 Sprinkler 10 423 15 000 15 000 11 000
3311 Sign 6 115 7 500 7 500 6 500 3320 Stable 210 300 300 300
3330 Elec Permit App Forms
3331 Firework s Application Fee 225
3390 Misc Permits 2 625 2 000 2 000 2 000
TOTAL PERMITS 943 210 756 200 756 200 756 200 0 0
FINES PENALTIES
3401 Traffic Ordinance Violation 117 899 125 000 125 000 125 000
3402 Vehicle Lockouts 1 746 2 500 2 500 2 500
3404 Dog Cat Impound 3 789 4 000 4 000
3405 Other Fines and Penalties 175
TOTAL FINES PENALTIES 123 609 131 500 131 500 127 500 3 0
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
3503 Reimbursement from School District 41 941 45 000 45 000 45 000
3509 Other Shared Taxes 125 349 130 000 130 000 125 000
3510 Grants State 110 223 90 000 90 000 100 000
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REV 277 513 265 000 265 000 270 000 1 9
44
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
REVENUE
101 General Fund
2010 2011 2011 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET PROJECTED BUDGET
CHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICES
3601 Sale of Documents
3602 Use Variance Permits
3603 Rezoning Fees
3604 Assessment Searches
3605 Plat Recording Fees
3607 Election Filing Fees
3613 Misc General Government
3614 Admin Charge 2 Constr
3615 Admin Charge 5 Street Re Constr
3615 Admin Charge 5 Utility Projects
3617 Engineering General
3619 Investment Management Fee
3629 Misc Public Safety
3630 Recreation Program Fees
3631 Recreation Center
3633 Park Equipment Rental
3634 Park Facility Usage Fee
3635 Watercraft Rental
3636 Self Supporting Programs
3637 Senior Programs
3638 Food Concessions
3639 Misc Park Rec
3641 Youth Sport Donation
3642 Recreation Sports
3649 Misc Public Works
3651 Merchandise Sales
3670 Internment Fee
TOTAL CURRENT SERVICES
OTHER REVENUE
3801 Interest Earnings
3802 Equipment Rental Sale
3803 Building Rental
3804 Land Sale
3807 Donations
3816 SAC Retainer
3818 Sur Tax Retainer
3820 Misc Other Revenue
3903 Refunds Reimbursements
3980 Cash Short Over
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE
Inc Over
PY Budget
3 034 1 000 1 000 1 500
6 545 10 000 10 000 7 000
500 2 000 2 000 500
270 500 500 400
1 650 3 000 3 000 2 000
20
3 191 5 000 5 000 3 200
49 042 20 000 20 000 40 000
16 664 30 000 30 000 60 000
20 701 20 000 20 000
30
75 000 75 000 75 000 75 000
11 865 10 000 10 000 11 500
33 799 40 000 40 000 35 000
227 487 230 000 230 000 230 000
150 300 300 300
12 521 14 000 14 000 14 000
5 467 4 500 4 500 5 000
55 066 97 000 97 000 93 600
28 801 30 000 30 000 30 000
10 212 12 000 12 000 12 000
1 165 1 200 1 200 1 200
29 713 31 000 31 000 31 000
2 100 5 000 5 000 2 000
1 911 1 500 1 500 1 500
50
596 952 643 000 643 000 656 700 2 1
37 575 100 000 100 000 60 000
195 623 180 000 180 000 150 000
5 420 5 000 5 000 5 000
7 400
35 285 25 200 25 200 31 400
2 479 5 000 5 000 3 000
629 1 000 1 000 1 000
317 1 000 1 000 500
107 415 38 000 38 000 45 000
4
392 147 355 200 355 200 295 900 16 7
9 764 750 9 617 600 9 617 600 9 659 300 0 4
TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 9 659 300
NET LEVY REMAINING Use of Gen Fund Reserves
45
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1110 Legislative
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4020 Salaries Wages Temp 28 850 30 000 30 000 0 0
4030 Contributions Retirement 2 048 2 200 2 200 0 0
4050 Workers Compensation 78 100 100 0 0
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 30 976 32 300 32 300 0 0
4210 Books Periodicals 200 100 50 0
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES 200 100 50 0
4300 Fees Services 1 383 2 000 2 000 0 0
4330 Postage 6 800 100 0
4340 Printing Publishing 34 821 36 000 36 000 0 0
4360 Subscriptions Memberships 23 918 25 000 25 000 0 0
4370 Travel Training 3 364 5 000 4 500 10 0
4375 Promotional Expense 5 309 1 000 1 300 30 0
4933 Sales Tax 3 0 0
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 68 798 75 800 68 800 9 2
TOTAL LEGISLATIVE 99 774 108 300 101 200 6 6
46
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1120 Administration
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4010 Salaries Wages Reg 314 601 319 300 323 000 1 2
4020 Salaries Wages Temp 220 1 000 1 000 0 0
4030 Contributions Retirement 44 264 47 800 48 100 0 6
4040 Contributions Insurance 31 637 35 800 35 300 1 4
4050 Workers Compensation 445 700 500 28 6
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 391 167 404 600 407 900 0 8
4120 Supplies Equipment 21 200 200 0 0
4130 Supplies Program 7 100 100 0 0
4210 Books Periodicals 200 200 0 0
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES 29 500 500 0 0
4300 Fees Services 15 910 7 000 7 000 0 0
4310 Telephone 3 427 4 000 4 000 0 0
4320 Utilities 26 0 0
4330 Postage 22 652 16 000 23 000 43 8
4340 Printing Publishing 71 1 000 300 70 0
4360 Subscriptions Memberships 3 079 4 500 4 300 4 4 4370 Travel Training 8 415 8 000 8 000 0 0
4380 Mileage 5 100 5 500 5 500 0 0
4410 Rental Equipment 13 587 14 500 14 500 0 0
4530 Repair Maintenance Equip 300 100 0
4807 Property Tax Expense 711 100 100 0
4933 Sales Tax 4 0 0
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 72 982 60 900 66 600 9 4
4703 Office Equipment 0 0
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION 464 177 466 000 475 000 1 9
47
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1130 Finance
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4010 Salaries Wages Reg
4030 Contributions Retirement
4040 Contributions Insurance
4050 Workers Compensation
4060 Unemployment
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
4120 Supplies Equipment
4210 Books Periodicals
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES
177 992 178 200 178 700 0 3
25 305 26 600 26 600 0 0
24 002 27 900 26 100 6 5
254 400 400 0 0
0 0
227 553 233 100 231 800 0 6
100 100 0 0
100 100 0 0
200 200 0 0
4300 Fees Services 10 764 7 000 11 000 57 1
4301 Fees Financial Audit 27 429 32 000 29 000 9 4
4310 Telephone and Communications 671 500 700 40 0
4330 Postage 200 100 0
4340 Printing Publishing 243 1 800 1 000 44 4
4360 Subscriptions Memberships 465 400 500 25 0
4370 Travel Training 2 890 6 100 5 500 9 8
4530 Repair Maintenance Equip 100 100 0 0
4933 Sales Tax 4 0 0
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 42 466 48 100 47 800 0 6
4703 Office Equipment 200 200 0 0
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 200 200 0 0
TOTAL FINANCE 270 019 281 600 280 000 0 6
48
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1140 Legal
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4302 Fees Legal
4340 Printing Publishing
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL LEGAL
142 163 142 000
170
142 333
142 333
142 000
142 000
145 000 2 1
0 0
145 000 2 1
145 000 2 1
49
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1150 Property Assessment
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4300 Fees Services 111 272 112 000 112 500 0 4
4340 Printing Publishing 160 100 100 0 0
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 111 432 112 100 112 600 0 4
TOTAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENT 111 432 112 100 112 600 0 4
50
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1160 Management Information Systems MIS
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4010 Salaries Wages Reg 137 201 137 000 139 100 1 5
4030 Contributions Retirement 19 722 20 500 20 600 0 5
4040 Contributions Insurance 16 919 19 600 19 500 0 5
4050 Workers Compensation 196 300 300 0 0
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 174 037 177 400 179 500 1 2
4150 Maintenance Materials 1 196 1 300 1 300 0 0
4210 Books Periodicals 290 600 300 50 0
4220 Software Licenses 0 0
4260 Small Tools Equipment 160 500 300 40 0
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES 1 647 2 400 1 900 20 8
4300 Fees Services 44 116 52 800 53 500 1 3
4310 Telephone 2 122 1 900 2 200 15 8
4320 Utilities 4 559 8 100 8 800 8 6
4370 Travel Training 5 186 7 000 6 000 14 3
4530 Repair Maintenance Equip 5 638 5 000 5 000 0 0
4933 Sales Tax 602 0 0
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 62 224 74 800 75 500 0 9
4703 Office Equipment 0 0
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0
TOTAL M I S 237 908 254 600 256 900 0 9
51
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1170 City Hall
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4010 Salaries Wages Reg 51 811 51 300 52 000 1 4
4011 Overtime Reg 5 080 3 500 3 500 0 0
4030 Contributions Retirement 8 241 7 700 8 200 6 5
4040 Contributions Insurance 6 423 7 400 7 400 0 0
4050 Workers Compensation 1 550 1 600 1 700 6 3
4260
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 73 106 71 500 72 800 1 8
4110 Supplies Office 38 184 37 000 37 000 0 0
4120 Supplies Equipment 321 1 000 100 90 0
4130 Supplies Program 48 0 0
4140 Supplies Vehicles 500 800 60 0
4150 Maintenance Materials 3 807 4 000 4 000 0 0
4260 Small Tools Equipment 1 057 400 400 0 0
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES 43 416 42 900 42 300 1 4
4300 Fees Services 10 480 9 000 11 000 22 2
4310 Telephone 9 844 12 000 10 500 12 5
4320 Utilities 36 630 50 000 46 000 8 0
4350 Cleaning Waste Removal 32 571 33 000 33 000 0 0
4370 Travel Training 1 542 200 200 0 0
4440 License Registration 100 100 0 0
4483 Insurance General Liability 180 380 176 000 178 000 1 1
4510 Repair Maintenance Building 6 117 10 000 8 000 20 0
4520 Repair Maintenance Vehicles 20 400 600 50 0
4530 Repair Maintenance Equip 5 141 3 000 5 000 66 7
4933 Sales Tax 192 300 300 0 0
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 282 916 294 000 292 700 0 4
TOTAL CITY HALL 399 437 408 400 407 800 0 1
52
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1180 Elections
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4020 Salaries Wages Temp 27 433 20 500 22 000 7 3
4030 Contributions Retirement 218 1 000 400 60 0
4050 Workers Compensation 71 100 100 0
4060 Unemployment 167 0 0
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 27 888 21 500 22 500 4 7
4110 Office Supplies 462 200 500 150 0
4300 Fees Services 10 092 3 000 5 000 66 7
4340 Printing Publishing 214 2 300 2 300 0 0
4370 Travel Training 3 639 1 200 1 800 50 0
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 14 407 6 700 9 600 43 3
TOTAL ELECTIONS 42 295 28 200 32 100 13 8
53
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1190 Library Building
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4120 Supplies Equipment
4150 Maintenance Materials
4260 Small Tools Equipment
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES
4300 Fees Services
4310 Telephone
4320 Utilities
4350 Cleaning Waste Removal
4510 Repair Maintenance Building
4530 Repair Maintenance Equip
4933 Sales Tax
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
60 0 0
3 433 3 000 3 000 0 0
45 0 0
3 538 3 000 3 000 0 0
4 970 6 500 6 500 0 0
1 454 1 800 1 600 11 1
64 376 70 000 68 000 2 9
31 759 34 000 33 000 2 9
5 591 5 000 5 000 0 0
2 075 7 000 5 000 28 6
43 0 0
110 266 124 300 119 100 4 2
TOTAL LIBRARY 113 803 127 300 122 100 4 1
54
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1210 Police Administration
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4010 Salaries Wages Reg
4030 Contributions Retirement
4040 Contributions Insurance
4050 Workers Compensation
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
4130 Program Supplies
4300 Fees Services
4360 Subscriptions Memberships
4370 Travel Training
4375 Promotional Expense
4933 Sales Tax
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL POLICE ADMINISTRATION
62 419 62 700 63 600 1 4
9 154 9 400 9 500 1 1
6 485 7 500 7 500 0 0
174 300 300 0 0
78 231 79 900 80 900 1 3
3 565 5 000 5 000 0 0
1 499 704 1 565 000 1 528 000 2 4
60 0 0
72 500 500 0 0
3 548 4 500 4 500 0 0
244 0 0
1 507 192 1 575 000 1 538 000 2 3
1 585 423 1 654 900 1 618 900 2 2
55
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1220 Fire Prevention and Administration
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4010 Salaries Wages Reg 134 121 135 000 137 000 1 5
4011 Overtime 146 1 000 1 000 0 0
4020 Salaries Wages Temp 180 369 160 000 190 000 18 8
4030 Contributions Retirement 136 587 175 000 150 000 14 3
4040 Contributions Insurance 23 307 27 200 26 000 4 4
4050 Workers Compensation 9 840 10 000 11 000 10 0
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 484 370 508 200 515 000 1 3
4120 Supplies Equipment 9 983 11 000 11 000 0 0
4130 Supplies Program 3 016 2 500 2 500 0 0
4140 Supplies Vehicles 10 551 12 000 11 500 4 2
4150 Maintenance Materials 611 500 500 0 0
4170 Motor Fuels and Lubrication 37 0 0
4210 Books Periodicals 600 600 0 0
4240 Uniforms Clothing 10 717 9 000 9 500 5 6
4260 Small Tools Equipment 5 179 5 000 5 000 0 0
4290 Misc Materials Supplies 5 744 5 000 5 000 0 0
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES 45 839 45 600 45 600 0 0
4300 Fees Services 7 509 11 000 11 000 0 0
4310 Telephone 4 560 5 000 5 000 0 0
4320 Utilities 23 377 25 000 25 000 0 0
4350 Cleaning Waste Removal 4 286 5 000 5 000 0 0
4360 Subscriptions Memberships 1 888 2 000 2 000 0 0
4370 Travel Training 11 513 10 000 20 000 100 0
4375 Promotional Expense 10 537 9 000 9 000 0 0
4483 Insurance General Liability 2 196 1 000 2 000 100 0
4510 Repair Maintenance Building 5 809 6 000 6 000 0 0
4520 Repair Maintenance Vehicles 2 004 8 000 7 000 12 5
4530 Repair Maintenance Equip 11 614 15 000 15 000 0 0
4531 Repair Maintenance Radios 5 618 5 000 5 000 0 0
Contribution for Performance 94 032 90 000 90 000 0 0
4933 Sales Tax 906 0 0
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 185 848 192 000 202 000 5 2
TOTAL FIRE PREVENTION ADMIN 716 057 745 800 762 600 2 3
56
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1250 Code Enforcement
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4010 Salaries Wages Reg 446 658 448 400 455 000 1 5
4011 Overtime Reg 0 0
4020 Salaries Wages Temp 0 0
4021 Overtime Temp 0 0
4030 Contributions Retirement 64 237 67 500 67 800 0 4
4040 Contributions Insurance 58 138 69 000 66 400 3 8
4050 Workers Compensation 1 123 1 400 1 500 7 1
4060 Unemployment 14 430 0 0
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 584 586 586 300 590 700 0 8
4120 Supplies Equipment 500 100 80 0
4130 Supplies Program 844 500 900 80 0
4140 Supplies Vehicles 1 379 1 700 1 700 0 0
4210 Books Periodicals 805 1 500 1 500 0 0
4240 Uniforms Clothing 247 500 500 0 0
4260 Small Tools Equipment 36 400 400 0 0
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES 3 311 5 100 5 100 0 0
4300 Fees Services 0 0
4310 Telephone 3 788 4 000 4 000 0 0
4340 Printing Publishing 915 2 000 1 500 25 0 4360 Subscriptions Memberships 365 1 000 1 000 0 0
4370 Travel Training 2 917 6 000 6 000 0 0
4375 Promotional Expense 200 100 0 4440 License Registration 324 200 500 150 0
4520 Repair Maintenance Vehicles 64 500 300 40 0
4530 Repair Maintenance Equip 1 667 2 000 2 000 0 0
4901 Refunds Reimbursements 1 725 1 000 1 000 0 0
4933 Sales Tax 31 0 0
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11 796 16 900 16 300 3 6
TOTAL CODE ENFORCEMENT 599 693 608 300 612 100 0 6
57
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1260 Community Service
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4020 Salaries Wages Temp 46 580 48 000 48 700 1 5
4021 Overtime Temp 908 1 400 1 400 0 0
4030 Contributions Retirement 6 988 6 500 7 200 10 8
4040 Contributions Insurance 1 276 700 1 200 71 4
4050 Workers Compensation 730 1 000 1 000 0 0
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 56 482 57 600 59 500 3 3
4120 Supplies Equipment 781 1 000 1 000 0 0
4130 Supplies Program 1 369 1 000 1 700 70 0
4140 Supplies Vehicles 650 1 000 800 20 0
4210 Books Periodicals 200 100 0
4240 Uniforms Clothing 785 1 000 1 000 0 0
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES 3 585 4 200 4 500 7 1
4300 Fees Services 9 935 9 000 9 000 0 0
4310 Telephone 836 1 100 1 000 9 1 4340 Printing Publishing 128 300 200 33 3 4360 Subscriptions Memberships 144 200 200 0 0
4370 Travel Training 644 700 700 0 0
4520 Repair Maintenance Vehicles 4 500 500 0 0
4530 Repair Maintenance Equip 10 300 100 66 7
4531 Repair Maintenance Radios 15 300 100 66 7
4933 Sales Tax 40 0 0
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11 756 12 400 11 800 4 8
TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICE 71 823 74 200 75 800 2 2
58
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1310 Engineering
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4010 Salaries Wages Reg 397 964 413 000 419 400 1 5
4011 Overtime Reg 1 500 1 500 0 0
4020 Salaries Wages Temp 5 252 15 000 15 000 0 0
4030 Contributions Retirement 57 839 61 700 62 300 1 0
4040 Contributions Insurance 42 597 48 400 50 000 3 3
4050 Workers Compensation 1 013 1 500 1 500 0 0
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 504 665 541 100 549 700 1 6
4120 Supplies Equipment 52 500 500 0 0
4140 Supplies Vehicles 332 700 700 0 0
4150 Maintenance Materials 0 0
4210 Books Periodicals 29 100 100 0 0
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES 413 1 300 1 300 0 0
4300 Fees Services 27 952 18 000 18 000 0 0
4310 Telephone 2 598 3 200 3 000 6 3
4330 Postage 400 100 0
4340 Printing Publishing 432 600 600 0 0
4360 Subscriptions Memberships 1 204 1 400 1 400 0 0
4370 Travel Training 1 597 3 000 3 000 0 0
4380 Mileage 93 500 500 0 0
4530 Repair Maintenance Equip 4 018 3 500 4 100 17 1
4933 Sales Tax 0 0
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 37 893 30 600 30 600 0 0
4705 Other Equipment 0 0
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0
TOTAL ENGINEERING 542 971 573 000 581 600 1 5
59
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1320 Street Maintenance
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4010 Salaries Wages Reg
4011 Overtime Reg
4020 Salaries Wages Temp
4021 Overtime Temp
4030 Contributions Retirement
4040 Contributions Insurance
4050 Workers Compensation
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
4120 Supplies Equipment
4140 Supplies Vehicles
4150 Maintenance Materials
4210 Books Periodicals
4240 Uniforms Clothing
4260 Small Tools Equipment
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES
4300 Fees Services
4310 Telephone
4340 Printing Publishing
4350 Cleaning Waste Removal
4360 Subscriptions Memberships
4370 Travel Training
4410 Rental Equipment
4440 License Registration
4510 Repair Maintenance Building
4520 Repair Maintenance Vehicles
4530 Repair Maintenance Equip
4531 Repair Maintenance Radios
4540 Repair Maintenance Streets
4560 Repair Maintenance Signs
4933 Sales Tax
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
4705 Other Equipment
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
448 096 462 400 457 700 1 0
20 377 18 000 20 000 11 1
9 546 10 000 10 000 0 0
28 0 0
66 576 70 000 68 000 2 9
67 431 71 700 74 600 4 0
29 023 30 000 33 200 10 7
641 077 662 100 663 500 0 2
42 696 40 000 40 000 0 0
22 909 18 000 18 000 0 0
102 280 65 000 75 000 15 4
100 100 0 0
4 929 4 800 4 800 0 0
1 094 1 700 1 700 0 0
173 907 129 600 139 600 7 7
1 672 1 000 1 000 0 0
3 700 3 800 3 800 0 0
92 300 300 0 0
516 300 300 0 0
64 1 200 1 200 0 0
1 300 2 000 2 000 0 0
992 1 500 1 500 0 0
600 600 0 0
500 500 0 0
160 3 000 1 000 66 7
3 833 5 500 5 500 0 0
143 0 0
1 669 2 000 2 000 0 0
18 357 10 000 10 000 0 0
3 086 0 0
35 584 31 700 29 700 6 3
1 000 0 0
1 000 0 0
TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE 851 568 823 400 832 800 1 1
60
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1350 Street Lighting Signals
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4120 Supplies Equipment 1 527 5 000 2 000 60 0
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES 1 527 5 000 2 000 60 0
4300 Fees Services 300 300 0 0
4310 Telephone 363 600 600 0 0
4320 Utilities 300 283 315 000 315 000 0 0
4530 Repair Maintenance Equip 2 500 100 0
4560 Repair Maintenance Signs 0 0
4565 Repair Maintenance Lights Signals 15 405 22 000 22 000 0 0
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 316 051 340 400 337 900 0 7
TOTAL STREET LIGHT SIGNALS 317 578 345 400 339 900 1 6
61
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1370 City Garage
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4010 Salaries Wages Reg 188 282 187 600 190 300 1 4
4011 Overtime Reg 5 950 6 500 6 500 0 0
4030 Contributions Retirement 27 246 28 000 28 300 1 1
4040 Contributions Insurance 29 457 35 700 34 400 3 6
4050 Workers Compensation 7 007 7 200 7 500 4 2
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 257 943 265 000 267 000 0 8
4120 Supplies Equipment 2 521 2 000 2 500 25 0
4140 Supplies Vehicles 360 500 500 0 0
4150 Maintenance Materials 2 186 1 000 1 200 20 0
4170 Motor Fuels Lubricants 127 767 138 000 150 000 8 7
4240 Uniforms Clothing 917 1 200 1 200 0 0
4260 Small Tools Equipment 4 518 3 000 4 000 33 3
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES 138 269 145 700 159 400 9 4
4300 Fees Services 2 430 1 300 2 000 53 8
4310 Telephone 4 811 4 000 4 500 12 5
4320 Utilities 49 899 60 000 60 000 0 0
4330 Postage 12 0 0
4340 Printing Publishing 100 100 0 0
4350 Cleaning Waste Removal 7 966 10 000 9 000 10 0
4360 Subscriptions Memberships 200 200 0 0
4370 Travel Training 179 800 800 0 0
4410 Rental Equipment 500 100 0
4440 License Registration 1 345 500 500 0 0
4510 Repair Maintenance Building 6 562 7 000 7 000 0 0
4520 Repair Maintenance Vehicles 300 100 0
4530 Repair Maintenance Equip 1 200 2 000 2 000 0 0
4531 Repair Maintenance Radios 100 100 0
4933 Sales Tax 400 0 0
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 74 802 86 800 86 100 0 8
4703 Office Equipment 500 500 0 0
4705 Other Equipment 2 974 5 000 4 000 20 0
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 2 974 5 500 4 500 18 2
TOTAL CITY GARAGE 473 988 503 000 517 000 2 8
62
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1410 Planning Commission
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4210 Books Periodicals
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES
4340 Printing Publishing
4360 Subscriptions Memberships
4370 Travel Training
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL PLANNING COMMISSION
200 200 0 0
200 200 0 0
2 453 3 000 3 000 0 0
200 200 0 0
476 800 800 0 0
2 928 4 000 4 000 0 0
2 928 4 200 4 200 0 0
63
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1420 Planning Administration
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
LCCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4010 Salaries Wages Reg 298 981 307 500 312 400 1 6
4030 Contributions Retirement 41 996 45 900 46 500 1 3
4040 Contributions Insurance 43 867 51 100 51 000 0 2
4050 Workers Compensation 426 600 600 0 0
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 385 270 405 100 410 500 1 3
4120 Supplies Equipment 104 300 300 0 0
4130 Supplies Program 100 100 0
4140 Supplies Vehicles 100 100 0 0
4210 Books Periodicals 200 100 0
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES 104 700 400 42 9
4300 Fees Services 20 5 000 5 000 0 0
4310 Telephone 200 100 0
4340 Printing Publishing 200 100 0
4360 Subscriptions Memberships 420 1 500 1 500 0 0
4370 Travel Training 4 786 5 500 5 500 0 0
4520 Repair Maintenance Vehicles 200 100 0
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5 226 12 600 12 000 4 8
TOTAL PLANNING ADMINISTRATION 390 600 418 400 422 900 1 1
64
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1430 Senior Commission
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4010 Salaries Wages Reg 17 942 17 900 18 100 1 1
4030 Contributions Retirement 2 600 2 700 2 700 0 0
4040 Contributions Insurance 1 632 1 900 1 900 0 0
4050 Workers Compensation 25 100 100 0 0
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 22 199 22 600 22 800 0 9
4300 Fees Services 8 467 9 000 9 000 0 0
4370 Travel Training 81 200 200 0 0
4375 Promotional Expense 93 500 500 0 0
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8 642 9 700 9 700 0 0
TOTAL SENIOR COMMISSION 30 841 32 300 32 500 0 6
65
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1510 Park and Recreation Commission
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4130 Supplies Program
4210 Books Periodicals
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES
4340 Printing Publishing
4360 Subscriptions Memberships
4370 Travel Training
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL PARK REC COMMISSION
100 100 0 0
100 100 0 0
200 200 0 0
1 687 1 100 1 700 54 5
430 600 500 16 7
409 300 400 33 3
2 526 2 000 2 600 30 0
2 526 2 200 2 800 27 3
66
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1520 Park and Recreation Administration
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
LCCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4010 Salaries Wages Reg
4030 Contributions Retirement
4040 Contributions Insurance
4050 Workers Compensation
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
4120 Supplies Equipment
4130 Supplies Program
4210 Books Periodicals
4240 Uniforms Clothing
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES
4300 Fees Services
4310 Telephone
4330 Postage
4340 Printing Publishing
4360 Subscriptions Memberships
4370 Travel Training
4380 Mileage
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
102 220 100 600 102 000 1 4
14 257 15 200 15 200 0 0
10 574 12 300 12 300 0 0
143 200 200 0 0
127 194 128 300 129 700 1 1
23 500 300 40 0
61 200 100 50 0
100 100 0 0
200 100 50 0
84 1 000 600 40 0
1 015 200 800 300 0
1 505 1 500 1 500 0 0
0 0
277 0 0
2 053 1 600 1 600 0 0
1 999 4 400 3 400 22 7
13 300 100 66 7
6 861 8 000 7 400 7 5
TOTAL PARK REC ADMINISTRATION 134 139 137 300 137 700 0 3
67
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1530 Recreation Center
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
WCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4010 Salaries Wages Reg 54 037 54 400 55 200 1 5
4020 Salaries Wages Temp 111 440 130 000 119 000 8 5
4021 Overtime Temp 99 0 0
4030 Contributions Retirement 23 711 28 500 28 500 0 0
4040 Contributions Insurance 6 439 7 500 7 400 1 3
4050 Workers Compensation 2 713 2 500 2 900 16 0
4060 Unemployment 722 0 0
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 199 161 222 900 213 000 4 4
4120 Supplies Equipment 1 260 3 000 3 000 0 0
4130 Supplies Program 34 778 42 000 42 000 0 0
4150 Maintenance Materials 235 500 500 0 0
4240 Uniforms Clothing 514 700 700 0 0
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES 36 786 46 200 46 200 0 0
4300 Fees Services 32 511 40 000 43 000 7 5
4310 Telephone 215 1 500 800 46 7
4320 Utilities 30 741 36 000 33 000 8 3
4360 Subscriptions Memberships 221 300 300 0 0
4370 Travel Training 681 400 400 0 0
4375 Promotional Expense 1 207 1 600 1 600 0 0
4510 Repair Maintenance Building 3 940 3 000 3 000 0 0
4530 Repair Maintenance Equip 1 680 1 000 1 700 70 0
4590 Misc Contractual Services 1 352 1 000 1 300 30 0
4901 Refunds Reimbursements 49 0 0
4933 Sales Tax 65 0 0
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 72 663 84 800 85 100 0 4
TOTAL RECREATION CENTER 308 610 353 900 344 300 2 7
68
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1540 Lake Ann Park Operations
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
LCCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4020 Salaries Wages Temp 5 819 8 000 8 000 0 0
4021 Overtime Temp 50 0 0
4030 Contributions Retirement 449 500 500 0 0
4050 Workers Compensation 99 200 200 0 0
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 6 417 8 700 8 700 0 0
4130 Supplies Program 8 021 7 000 7 000 0 0
4240 Uniforms Clothing 500 200 60 0
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES 8 021 7 500 7 200 4 0
4300 Fees Services 27 280 31 000 31 000 0 0
4310 Telephone 1 090 1 500 1 500 0 0
4320 Utilities 9 972 13 000 13 000 0 0
4340 Printing Publishing 267 400 400 0 0
4903 Bad Debt Expense 54 0 0
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 38 663 457900 45 900 0 0
TOTAL LAKE ANN PARK OPERATIONS 63 102 62 100 61 800 0 5
69
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1550 Park Maintenance
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4010 Salaries Wages Reg 457 289 452 600 459 400 1 5
4011 Overtime Reg 23 504 15 000 20 000 33 3
4020 Salaries Wages Temp 89 404 90 000 99 600 10 7
4021 Overtime Temp 3 386 4 000 4 000 0 0
4030 Contributions Retirement 75 138 72 000 78 000 8 3
4040 Contributions Insurance 65 922 78 400 76 800 2 0
4050 Workers Compensation 9 258 11 200 11 200 0 0
4060 Unemployment 489 0 0
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 724 389 723 200 749 000 3 6
4120 Supplies Equipment 40 465 34 000 36 500 7 4
4140 Supplies Vehicles 4 438 5 000 4 600 8 0 4150 Maintenance Materials 27 870 31 000 31 000 0 0
4151 Irrigation Materials 3 158 3 000 3 000 0 0
4240 Uniforms Clothing 2 113 2 800 2 800 0 0
4260 Small Tools Equipment 1 940 2 000 2 000 0 0
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES 79 984 77 800 79 900 2 7
4300 Fees Services 53 744 22 000 22 000 0 0
4310 Telephone 2 443 2 700 2 700 0 0
4320 Utilities 12 558 12 000 12 500 4 2
4330 Postage 12 0 0
4340 Printing Publishing 275 400 400 0 0
4350 Cleaning Waste Removal 5 416 7 000 6 500 7 1 4360 Subscriptions Memberships 400 400 0 0
4370 Travel Training 581 1 000 1 000 0 0
4400 Rental Land Buildings 32 452 32 500 32 500 0 0
4410 Rental Equipment 212 1 000 1 000 0 0
4440 License Registration 700 200 71 4
4510 Repair Maintenance Building 3 099 2 500 2 500 0 0
4520 Repair Maintenance Vehicles 2 000 500 75 0
4530 Repair Maintenance Equip 5 786 5 000 5 000 0 0
4531 Repair Maintenance Radios 100 100 0 0
4560 Repair Maintenance Signs 2 497 3 000 3 000 0 0
4933 Sales Tax 346 0 0
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 119 421 92 300 90 300 2 2
4705 Other Equipment 5 088 5 000 4 000 20 0
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 5 088 5 000 4 000 20 0
TOTAL PARK MAINTENANCE 928 882 898 300 923 200 2 8
70
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1560 Senior Citizens Center
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
CCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4010 Salaries Wages Reg
4030 Contributions Retirement
4040 Contributions Insurance
4050 Workers Compensation
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
4120 Supplies Equipment
4130 Supplies Program
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES
4300 Fees Services
4340 Printing Publishing
4350 Cleaning Waste Removal
4360 Subscriptions Memberships
4370 Travel Training
4375 Promotional Expense
4380 Mileage
4933 Sales Tax
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER
38 287 38 600 39 100 1 3
5 609 5 800 5 900 1 7
295 300 0 0
55 100 100 0 0
44 245 44 500 45 400 2 0
397 300 300 0 0
2 720 3 200 3 000 6 3
3 117 3 500 3 300 5 7
21 196 20 000 20 000 0 0
100 100 0 0
80 200 200 0 0
59 100 100 0 0
276 300 300 0 0
74 200 200 0 0
64 100 100 0 0
0 0 0
21 749 21 000 21 000 0 0
69 111 69 000 69 700 1 0
71
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1600 Recreation Programs
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
CCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4010 Salaries Wages Reg
4020 Salaries Wages Temp
4021 Overtime Temp
4030 Contributions Retirement
4040 Contributions Insurance
4050 Workers Compensation
4370
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
4120 Supplies Equipment
4130 Supplies Program
4240 Uniforms Clothing
4933
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES
4300 Fees Services
4310 Telephone
4320 Utilities
4330 Postage
4340 Printing Publishing
4360 Subscriptions Memberships
4370 Travel Training
4380 Mileage
4400 Rental Land Buildings
4410 Rental Equipment
4933 Sales Tax
1 100
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL RECREATION PROGRAMS
90 434 89 800 91 100 1 4
46 431 54 500 54 500 0 0
205 1 100 1 100 0 0
16 640 17 500 17 200 1 7
8 034 8 900 8 700 2 2
878 1 000 1 100 10 0
162 621 172 800 173 700 0 5
2 000 2 000 0 0
13 165 15 600 15 600 0 0
1 244 1 500 1 500 0 0
14 409 19 100 19 100 0 0
55 860 54 000 54 000 0 0
2 087 1 300 2 100 61 5
3 487 3 000 3 000 0 0
200 100 0
5 239 4 400 4 900 11 4
35 0 0
293 600 600 0 0
100 100 0 0
7 268 6 500 7 000 7 7
22 832 20 000 23 000 15 0
198 0 0
97 299 90 100 94 700 5 1
274 330 282 000 287 500 2 0
72
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1700 Self Supporting Programs
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
LCCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4010 Salaries Wages Reg 22 608 23 500 23 800 1 3
4020 Salaries Wages Temp 3 109 900 3 000 233 3
4030 Contributions Retirement 3 549 3 700 3 800 2 7
4040 Contributions Insurance 2 008 2 200 2 200 0 0
4050 Workers Compensation 74 100 100 0 0
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 31 349 30 400 32 900 8 2
4120 Supplies Equipment 600 100 0
4130 Supplies Program 7 501 8 000 7 700 3 8
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES 7 501 8 600 7 700 10 5
4300 Fees Services 22 933 43 000 37 000 14 0
4933 Sales Tax 81 0 0
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 23 014 43 000 37 000 14 0
TOTAL SELF SUPPORTING PROGRAMS 61 864 82 000 77 600 5 4
73
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2012 BUDGET
101 General Fund
1800 Recreation Sports
2011 to
2010 2011 2012 2012
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET INC DEC
4020 Salaries Wages Temp
4030 Contributions Retirement
4050 Workers Compensation
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
4120 Supplies Equipment
4130 Supplies Program
4240 Uniforms Clothing
4375 Promotional Exepnses
TOTAL MATERIALS SUPPLIES
4300 Fees Services
4340 Printing Publishing
4933 Sales Tax
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
11 880 10 000 12 000 20 0
1 034 400 1 000 150 0
198 100 200 100 0
13 112 10 500 13 200 25 7
2 106 2 000 2 000 0 0
857 2 100 2 100 0 0
4 763 3 800 4 200 10 5
1 000 200 80 0
7 726 8 900 8 500 4 5
120
777
45
942
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAL RECREATION SPORTS 21 780 19 400 21 700 11 9
74
CITY OF CHANHASSEN DECEMBER
TAX LEVY
2012 Budget
TAX CAPACITY BASED TAX LEVY
General Fund
Capital Replacement Fund for equipment
Pavement Mgmt Fund Sealcoating
General Obligation Debt 212 Bonds
Audubon Revolving Assess Fund EDA
Public Works Facility
Potential Fire Station
Debt of Other Agencies EDA
TOTAL TAX CAPACITY BASED TAX LEVIES
MARKET VALUE TAX LEVY
Library Referendum
TOTAL MARKET VALUE TAX LEVY
Use of cash reserves to buy down debt levies
TOTAL TAX LEVY
Dollar Increase
2011 2012 Percent
Levy Levy Increase
7 508 200 7 477 200 0 41
750 000 750 000 0 00
200 000 200 000 0 00
336 800 335 900 0 27
256 570 437 842 70 65
594 000 593 800 0 03
90 000 100 00
126 420 100 00
9 771 990 9 884 742 1 15
495 400 351 648 29 02
495 400 351 648 29 02
0 0
10 267 390 10 236 390 0 30
31 000
Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3
Taxes applied to General Fund 7 514 700 7 477 200 7 477 200
Capital Replacement 750 000 750 000 750 000
Pavement Mgmt 200 000 200 000 200 000
Total Levy subject to levy limits 8 464 700 8 427 200 8 427 200
Library Referendum 351 648 351 648 351 648
GO Debt 212 Bonds 335 900 335 900 335 900
Public Works Facility 593 800 593 800 593 800
Audubon 437 842 437 842 437 842
Potential Fire Station 90 000 90 000 0
Total 10 273 890 10 236 390 10 146 390
Tax Generation Capacity Not actual levy Used only for estimating the impact on the average home
Prior Year 10 267 390 10 267 390 10 267 390
New Construction 119 000 119 000 119 000
MVHC Adj to tax capacity 150 000 150 000 150 000
TIF Dist 1 0 0 0
Eden Trace TIF 0 0 0
Gateway TIF 0 0 0
Total Capacity
Estimated Effect on avg Taxpayer
Estimated Dollar Effect on avg Taxpayer
10 236 390 10 236 390 10 236 390
0 37 0 00 0 88
3 20 7 72
31 000
75
INVITATION TO TREE LIGHTING CEREMONY
With the holiday season approaching I am happy to invite everyone to a wonderful city event
The City of Chanhassen and Buy Chanhassen are proud to announce the 2011 Tree Lighting
Ceremony I invite all area residents their families and friends to join me on Saturday
December 3 rd from 5 00 6 00 p m on the Plaza in City Center Park for this event People of
ALL ages will enjoy activities including the official lighting of City Center Park refreshments
caroling gingerbread displays live reindeer and a special visit from Santa and some of his
helpers This entire event is free and NO registration is required For more information feel
free to call City Hall
76
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION NOVEMBER 14 2011
Mayor Furlong called the work session meeting to order at 5 30 p m
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT Mayor Furlong Councilman McDonald Councilwoman
Tjornhom Councilwoman Ernst and Councilman Laufenburger
STAFF PRESENT Todd Gerhardt Laurie Hokkanen Paul Oehme Kate Aanenson Todd Hoffman
and Greg Sticha
PUBLIC PRESENT
Vernelle Clayton Buy Chanhassen 422 Santa Fe Circle
Bill Munig 6850 Stratford Boulevard Excelsior
Rick Dorsey 14215 Green View Court Eden Prairie Laurie Susla 7008 Dakota
Jeff Fox 5270 Howards Points Road Excelsior Scott Hippen 7017 Cheyenne Trail
TH 101 LYMAN BLVD TO PIONEER TRAIL ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT UPDATE
Paul Oehme introduced Tim Quinn with MnDOT Bill Weckman Assistant Carver County Engineer and
Jon Horn with Kimley Horn and Associates who are all working together on this project Jon Horn
reviewed background information project need proposed improvements and the proposed schedule In reviewing the EA EAW process he reviewed comments from the public hearing and written comments
pertaining to tree removal native prairie and wildlife habitat impact noise traffic right of way acquisition and the amount of pavement involved with constructing 4 lane versus a 2 lane roadway
Council and staff discussed the extent of the construction limits and the priority to save trees wherever
possible Councilman McDonald asked about plans for noise mitigation i e sound walls and or berms and the impact to driveway accesses onto a 4 lane road Councilwoman Tjornhom asked about the speed
design of a 40 miles per hour roadway Jon Horn discussed the budget and financing breakdown between
federal state and local government Councilman Laufenburger asked for clarification on what entity will make the final decision on a 2 lane versus 4 lane roadway Jon Horn explained that even though it s been
a partnership between MnDOT Carver County and the City it is the City with the final say Mayor
Furlong reiterated that at the next neighborhood meeting residents understand how all their concerns were addressed
2012 BUDGET DISCUSSION
DISCUSS SICK VACATION BENEFITS
Laurie Hokkanen explained that there was no change proposed for sick benefits but staff was directed to
do further research on reducing the vacation accrual rate to 2 times or 1 1 2 times the employee s earning
rate and propose an implementation plan for a reduction in balances Staff is recommending option 1 which would give employees a number of years equal to their accrual rate to reduce their balances
Councilman Laufenburger asked what will happen with employees leaving prior to the transition period be completed Mayor Furlong asked how the reduction in vacation time will be monitored and
implemented Councilman McDonald asked about the impact of employees taking additional vacation
time to reduce their balances In discussing using 1 1 2 or 2 times accrual rate Councilman Laufenburger
77
City Council Work Session November 14 2011
stated he was uncomfortable with the 3 to 5 years maximum in Option 2 and the maximum amount of
vacation time employees can earn of 27 days 5 weeks plus 2 days He would prefer seeing a maximum
of 22 days 4 weeks plus 2 days and asked about introducing a 10 to 15 year tier Councilwoman Ernst stated her goal was to eliminate the liability and would propose not to carry over more than 2 weeks with
a transition period of 5 years In asking to revisit the issue of sick time she asked that paid time off be
10 days with no carry over Councilwoman Tjornhom stated she was in favor of a 2 times accrual rate with 3 to 5 year transition period and initiating the new policy with new hires Councilman McDonald
stated he was comfortable with the 2 times accrual rate and would support eliminating the 27 days maximum and capping everything at 22 days immediately into the future He would support a 2 to 3 year
transition period but would like to know the impact on departments Mayor Furlong stated he preferred
the 1 1 2 time accrual rate but could support the 2 times He asked for additional information on the effect of option 2 with a 3 year transition period and additional information on the maximum accrual rate
Council discussed implementing the new policy by January 1 2012
The work session was recessed at 7 00 p m It was reconvened at 8 40 p m
DISCUSS CONSIDERING NO FAULT INSURANCE
Laurie Hokkanen presented information on the cost for premiums deductible per incident and the opportunity cost offered by the League of Minnesota Cities She reviewed what is covered by no fault
insurance damaged caused by watermain or sewer back up that s not otherwise covered by the city s
general liability insurance the fact that there are several exclusions and the maximum amounts covered
Councilman Laufenburger asked for clarification of the League of Minnesota Cities definition of what s covered and what s considered under the city s sewer system and how they determine the number of
structures or connections per incident Laurie Hokkanen explained how no fault insurance would interchange with homeowners insurance and showed an example of a sewer back up scenario
Councilman Laufenburger asked about the number of claims that can be submitted per year requirements
or guidelines of underwriter and the legality of using public funds for private use Councilman McDonald questioned the amount of premiums and deductible versus the City s current policy Laurie Hokkanen
stated staff would have quotes for no fault insurance by mid December Councilman Laufenburger stated
he was in support of continuing to look at fault insurance as being prudent when comparing quotes Councilman McDonald stated he was not in favor of shifting everything over to the League of Minnesota
Cities at this point but would favor looking at creating a catastrophic fund Todd Gerhardt explained that
staff can prepare comparison of last year s claims after receiving the quotes Mayor Furlong explained his belief that it is not the City s role to provide for private needs Councilwoman Tjornhom agreed that
there should not be a government role in private property needs Councilwoman Ernst stated she would like to see the quote comparisons but agreed it was a philosophical decision on the City s role in
supplementing private property Mayor Furlong asked staff to educate the public on what is covered
under the City s insurance Councilwoman Ernst asked about providing information on the City s
website Todd Gerhardt stated staff will prepare a procedure document outlining the City s role in future catastrophic events to ensure staff and council are on the same page
LEGAL SERVICES COMPARISON Laurie Hokkanen reviewed the chart showing comparisons with key financial strategy cities After discussion council members were comfortable with staying with
Campbell Knutson noting it was a good value
2012 BUDGET
Greg Sticha provided an update on current budget information noting no changes to expenses since the
preliminary levy was set Councilman Laufenburger asked for snow plow safety criteria for upcoming
months Councilwoman Ernst asked how the new information impacts the preliminary levy numbers and
2
78
City Council Work Session November 14 2011
asked to see a scenario without a 1 5 wage increase and no increase in health insurance employees
would absorb increase Greg Sticha explained what will be presented at the Truth in Taxation hearing on th Dec 5 Mayor Furlong asked to see a budget that keeps general fund expenditures flat from 2011 to 2012 with the caveat of keeping service levels the same He asked staff to look at the future long term fire
service needs and the impact of reducing the 90 000 amount for a potential future fire station and
perhaps using those dollars for more immediate CIP needs
DISCUSS HOOK UP FEE FOR IRRIGATION ACCOUNTS In reviewing this item staff is recommending no change to the hook up charge for irrigation accounts Council concurred
DISCUSS KEY FINANCIAL STRATEGY ENHANCE LOCAL TAX BASE
Todd Gerhardt reviewed what staff has done over the past year to enhance the local tax base Kate
Aanenson discussed and showed examples of how staff is using the City s website to show available land inventory discussed meetings staff has held with local businesses new businesses and code
amendments noting that subdivisions are continuing to be worked on by city staff
Mayor Furlong adjourned the work session at 9 55 p m
Submitted by Todd Gerhardt
City Manager
Prepared by Nann Opheim
3
79
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES
NOVEMBER 14 2011
Mayor Furlong called the meeting to order at 7 05 p m The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT Mayor Furlong Councilman McDonald Councilwoman Tjornhom Councilwoman Ernst and Councilman Laufenburger
STAFF PRESENT Todd Gerhardt Laurie Hokkanen Paul Oehme Kate Aanenson Todd Hoffman
Greg Sticha and Roger Knutson
PUBLIC PRESENT
Bob Cheryl Ayotte 6213 Cascade Pass Ron Schlangen 8912 Neill Lake Road Eden Prairie
Peter Tricia Nowling 6271 Blue Jay Court Gary Boyle 9284 Bavaria Beach Road
Melanie H Christian Svensgaard 795 Carver Beach Road
Sue Bruce Koehnen 1830 Koehnen Circle Bruce Burrington 6869 Yuma
Bob Moore 6839 Yuma
Vernelle Clayton 422 Santa Fe Circle
Scott Hippen 7017 Cheyenne Trail
CONSENT AGENDA Councilwoman Ernst moved Councilman McDonald seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager s recommendations
a Approval of Minutes City Council Work Session Minutes dated October 24 2011
City Council Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated October 24 2011
Receive Commission Minutes
Planning Commission Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated October 18 2011
b Approve Release of Land from Contract for Private Redevelopment and Assessment Agreement nd 2860 Water Tower Place Lot 2 Block 1 Arboretum Business Park 2 Addition PID 019 25075002
Resolution 2011 62 c Accept Donation of Double Batting Cages for Lake Susan Park
Chanhassen Athletic Association
th d Approve Expansion of Licensed Premises Haskell s Wine Spirits 19900 West 78 Street
e Approval of Temporary On Sale Liquor License for School Athletics Fundraiser St Hubert s
Catholic Community January 28 2012
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0
80
City Council Summary November 14 2011
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Ron Schlangen Commander of the Chanhassen American Legion
thanked the City for all that they do for veterans Gary Boyle speaking on behalf of the Chanhassen
American Legion provided information on their efforts in getting Chanhassen proclaimed as a Beyond the Yellow Ribbon Community and what is involved with that designation Gary Van Eyll District 3
Representative for the Metropolitan Council provided background information on his appointment and
talked about changes at the Met Council level Councilman Laufenburger asked about the council s objectives moving forward Mayor Furlong suggested that the Met Council consider planning for the
transportation needs of this district Councilman McDonald invited Mr Van Eyll to a Southwest Transit Commission meeting to discuss the opt out program
NOWLING VARIANCE APPEAL REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A SINGLE FAMILY HOME 6829 YUMA DRIVE APPLICANT PETER TRICIA NOWLING
Kate Aanenson presented the staff report and update on the appeal of the Planning Commission s decision Councilwoman Ernst asked for clarification on the location of the drainage easement and why
Ringo Drive is not considered a public road Councilman Laufenburger asked the City Engineer to explain why the building footprint was moved Bob Moore the neighbor who filed the appeal explained
where his property lies in relation to location of the culvert explaining the reason for the appeal was
clarification of water drainage and concern with the location of the house in relation to the street Mayor Furlong opened the meeting up for public comment Bruce Barrington 6869 Yuma commented on the
amount of water runoff in the area and if council members had actually visited the site After comments
from council members the following motion was made
Councilwoman Tjornhom moved Councilman McDonald seconded that the Chanhassen City
Council approves Planning Case 2011 10 for the construction of a single family home with variances subject to the conditions of the staff report and the adoption of the Findings of Fact and
Decision All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0
COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS Councilman Laufenburger discussed Mediacom s open house at the th Rec Center on November 10 Mayor Furlong discussed his invitation to speak at the Chanhassen High th School s induction of 70 students into the National Honor Society on November 7
ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS Todd Gerhardt provided an update on a meeting with the
Minnewashta Heights neighborhood regarding an upcoming road improvement project and invited council members to attend a chamber event on Wednesday in which Mayor Furlong will be giving the
State of the City address
CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION None
Councilman Laufenburger moved Councilwoman Ernst seconded to adjourn the meeting All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0 The City Council meeting
was adjourned at 8 10 p m
Submitted by Todd Gerhardt
City Manager
Prepared by Nann Opheim
2
81
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 14 2011
Mayor Furlong called the meeting to order at 7 05 p m The meeting was opened with the Pledge to
the Flag
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT Mayor Furlong Councilman McDonald Councilwoman
Tjornhom Councilwoman Ernst and Councilman Laufenburger
STAFF PRESENT Todd Gerhardt Laurie Hokkanen Paul Oehme Kate Aanenson Todd Hoffman Greg Sticha and Roger Knutson
PUBLIC PRESENT
Bob Cheryl Ayotte 6213 Cascade Pass
Ron Schlangen 8912 Neill Lake Road Eden Prairie Peter Tricia Nowling 6271 Blue Jay Court
Gary Boyle 9284 Bavaria Beach Road Melanie H Christian Svensgaard 795 Carver Beach Road
Sue Bruce Koehnen 1830 Koehnen Circle
Bruce Burrington 6869 Yuma Bob Moore 6839 Yuma
Vernelle Clayton 422 Santa Fe Circle
Scott Hippen 7017 Cheyenne Trail
Mayor Furlong Thank you and welcome to everybody here in the council chambers as well as those
watching at home We re glad that you joined us this evening At this time I would ask members of the council if there are any changes or modifications to the agenda If not we ll proceed with the agenda that
was published without objection
CONSENT AGENDA Councilwoman Ernst moved Councilman McDonald seconded to approve
the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager s recommendations
a Approval of Minutes
City Council Work Session Minutes dated October 24 2011
City Council Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated October 24 2011
Receive Commission Minutes Planning Commission Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated October 18 2011
b Approve Release of Land from Contract for Private Redevelopment and Assessment Agreement nd 2860 Water Tower Place Lot 2 Block 1 Arboretum Business Park 2 Addition PID 019 25075002
Resolution 2011 62 c Accept Donation of Double Batting Cages for Lake Susan Park Chanhassen Athletic Association
th d Approve Expansion of Licensed Premises Haskell s Wine Spirits 19900 West 78 Street
82
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
e Approval of Temporary On Sale Liquor License for School Athletics Fundraiser St Hubert s
Catholic Community January 28 2012
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
Ron Schlangen This is my first time here so I apologize for not knowing the protocol
Mayor Furlong Well welcome Commander If you could state your name and address please
Ron Schlangen My name is Rob Schlangen I live in Eden Prairie Minnesota and I am the Commander
of the Chanhassen American Legion I just want to thank the City for all that they do for us veterans in
many many ways Starting with Memorial Day They always are very receptive to us having the monument that Gary was so instrumental in helping construct and all that Fourth of July parade was a
big thing for us and now the Beyond the Yellow Ribbon with Tom being a member but basically the whole community supporting veterans Supporting military families Just simply being patriotic and
supporting us veterans including our veteran back here Vietnam veteran City Attorney So I just
wanted to take a moment because I ve never had the opportunity I ve never been to a City Council meeting in my life before so I thank you for allowing us to be here
Mayor Furlong Well thank you very much We appreciate those comments Anyone else for visitor
presentations At this time I d like to welcome Gary Boyle who s representing the Chanhassen American Legion Former City Council member as well Welcome back to the council chambers
Gary Boyle Thank you Thank you It s a little different being on this side interested people and of
course this guy s got to up stage me but My name s Gary Boyle I currently live in Chaska I was a
council member a few years ago and on the HRA when it was HRA I m representing the Chanhassen American Legion who along with the City of Chanhassen which Tom is on the steering committee is
sponsoring the objective of getting Chanhassen proclaimed as a Beyond the Yellow Ribbon Community
Just to give you a little bit and I know you received quite a bit of information and I know Tom put a letter out but Beyond the Yellow Ribbon is a comprehensive program that creates awareness for the purpose of
connecting service members and their families into community support training services and resources
For example if a spouse is deployed overseas and the family needs some assistance in mowing the lawn removing snow electrical work contract work whatever it might be we will have a resource that they
can call and they say yes In Chanhassen we have so and so and go to so and so and we will connect them th with a person Our meeting on November 19 is geared to finding this network this source that people
that will have the ability to help our service members families when they re deployed or when they get
back If they need child support whatever Of finding those people so we can make the connection It s
a network program And my basic purpose here tonight is to give you that information and then say th please you re invited to the meeting on November 19 at 10 00 a m at the Chanhassen American Legion
We will have some cookies for Bob Ayotte Or excuse me donuts for Bob Ayotte and cookies and other
refreshments Do you have any questions
th Mayor Furlong Questions for Mr Boyle The meeting on the 19 10 00 I believe Is that correct 10 00 Saturday morning at the American Legion
Gary Boyle Correct
Mayor Furlong And again if there are people working with or part of an organization churches schools
other non profits I know there will be representatives from the Lion s and the Rotary Club there and
2
83
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
others but if there are people that are working with an association that would be interested in helping
other people and that s what this is about is putting together as Mr Boyle said putting together those
contacts so when people need help we can help them You know they re free to come as well and I know Ms Hokkanen is active on the steering committee as well as with a number of other people There are
about 12 or 15 people on the steering committee if my count s correct and so if there are other people
interested This is a good organization It s a Minnesota born organization as I understand it Beyond the Yellow Ribbon There are a number of other cities that have received this designation While the
designation is important I think the key is too that it s really the organization going beyond the designation to help other people To help those who either their husband their wife a family member is
currently deployed or coming back from deployment We had a very sad situation with a Chanhassen
soldier earlier this last week and the and while he was in active duty there were clearly some issues from deployment as well and they were challenging so what we re trying to do is get people together to help
other people where needs are identified so thank you for taking the lead on this I appreciate it Thank
the Legion and Gary for taking the lead on the steering committee for this great organization
Gary Boyle Thank you and Laurie thank you tremendously for all your support We I just was contacted recently by the young man who was wounded in Iraq and is back and will be at the meeting and
we have a young lady there also who s going to talk about what it s like to be a spouse when a husband is
gone and a video that I swear when you see that if you don t have a lump in your throat I d be amazed It s going to be a very interesting meeting Not a dry meeting so don t hesitate to come Any other
questions If not thank you
Mayor Furlong Any other questions for Mr Boyle
Gary Boyle Thank you very much
Mayor Furlong Thank you Also with us this evening is Mr Gary Van Eyll who is the District 3
Representative for Chanhassen which is part of Chanhassen at the Metropolitan Council Former Chaska Mayor We ve got all sorts of former council members here this evening Good evening Mr Van Eyll
how are you
Gary Van Eyll Doing great Thank you very much Mayor Furlong and council people I appreciate this
opportunity and it s a great organization and I know that there are other communities around here that are
going to attempt to be that
Mayor Furlong Chaska is as well I know They have an active group
Gary Van Eyll Yes Yes it is and the Met Council was the first state agency that has become a Beyond
the Yellow Ribbon agency so you know we re very proud of that so it s a great organization and I m glad
to see that as always the Chanhassen community is stepping forward and doing that It s great to see As Mayor Furlong said my name is Gary Van Eyll I ll just give you a little bit of background Nobody had
any specific questions they wanted to hear so I think it was just more of a meet and greet If you have
some questions I sure will answer them but to just give you a little bit of background on myself Like the Mayor said he and I were rookie mayors together way back when That s been a couple years ago now I
know but so we got together quite a few times when we were learning the ropes and so but I ve been in was on the council 4 years before that I was with the volunteer fire department for 20 years before that
so been involved in the community for quite a while Councilmember Laufenburger and myself were on
the U S Census and we counted quite a few people and learned some things along the way and glad to see that the councilmember got elected even though I have some we had some difficulties
3
84
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
Councilman Laufenburger You don t need to disclose that Gary We don t need that on either of our
public records okay
Gary Van Eyll Oh okay Okay Then I won t say anything about it at all
Councilman Laufenburger No thank you very much
Gary Van Eyll But so I ve been involved in the community affairs for quite a few years so when I got this opportunity to represent your community and this district I thought that I could do a great job for us
This district is covers quite an area It covers all of Scott County except New Prague who s not in the 7
county metro area for some reason All of Carver County and in Hennepin County I have St Boni and Minnetrista so by far I have the largest area of anybody on the council and some people say that they have
8 council that they go and see once a month I have like 23 or 25 councils that I have to go see so I
appreciate the opportunity coming here I m on the Management Committee I m on the Environment Committee and I am the Chairperson of the Audit Committee so it s I have got appointed on the first part
of March and since then I have learned considerably a lot about the Metropolitan Council and about the functions that we have Unfortunately we haven t been able to do a lot I think that we re in the process
right now of setting different priorities and different goals than what the previous council has which
might change a little bit and hopefully that is going to be more of a positive change I think you ll see that this council is a little bit more proactive Being out and about a little bit more just like I am right
here I think I only have like 3 or 4 of my councils that I have to visit yet And then I ll start on my
second go around because I do not want to be the type of council person that doesn t show up I want to
be around and if you have any questions I want you to be able to have a face that you can ask questions with so With that being said that is about everything I had to say tonight If there are any questions I
sure would like to answer them If I can t I ll sure get back to you Otherwise I just have some cards I ll pass out You have my name and phone number My phone number is my home I office out of my
house so you can just call me there
Mayor Furlong Any questions of Representative Van Eyll
Councilman Laufenburger Just a couple if you don t mind
Mayor Furlong Councilman Laufenburger
Councilman Laufenburger Mr Van Eyll we thank you for your service I know that this is the
Metropolitan Council is an appointed position is that correct
Gary Van Eyll Yes it is
Councilman Laufenburger Appointed by the Governor right
Gary Van Eyll Yep
Councilman Laufenburger And I think for the most part the entire Met Council with the exception of
maybe one or two people was were newly appointed in what was it February or January or something like that
Gary Van Eyll In March
Councilman Laufenburger In March
4
85
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
Gary Van Eyll It was entirely appointed except for one so we have 16 council people and one chair
person The other council person that wasn t appointed that was re appointed had only been on for
approximately 2 years
Councilman Laufenburger Okay so Gary do you see that this council operates as a are they a balanced
approach to the Metro Council To the metropolitan area or are they sharply geared towards Dayton who made the appointment So I m asking you to make a statement about how you see the council operating
Gary Van Eyll We do perform at the at Governor Dayton s convenience but as far as I know that he has
not come up and said this is what you have to do and we have never made a decision that says this is what
you have to do I don t think though that now we are in the process of setting our goals and objectives for this council We have been in just for the last 6 months doing what the previous council has set for
goals and objectives and just carrying those out and when we set our goals and objectives we ll see what
the Governor does say and if there s something that he does disagree with then you re right We can t do it but so far I don t I haven t seen anything like that and I can t we ve had some I think the more we get
into it the better discussion and the better governing we re going to be able to do
Councilman Laufenburger Okay And the chair person is Ms Haigh is that right
Gary Van Eyll Yep Chairperson Susan Haigh
Councilman Laufenburger So has she identified some key objectives that she wants the members of the
council to align behind
Gary Van Eyll Yes We have talked a lot about as you know Chair Haigh was came from Habitat for Humanity and we ve talked about affordable housing and talked about some of the things that where the
corridors of housing should be and that s what she s talking about But when we re doing studies I think
that one of the great things about the Metropolitan Council is it it s a planning organization and basically I ve found that it s it s basis it s real back bone is planning and so far that s what we re getting I mean
they ve taken the results of our U S Census and put it down and talked about the planning and where
housing should be and available space and things like that that probably will be used when we set our goals and objectives but yes she is a chair just like the mayor Has a little bit more influence than lowly
guy out here in District 4 Like one of the city administrators from out here Susan Arntz out of Waconia
said Gary you re a long way out Make sure you have a loud voice she said so I don t know you probably you know me a little bit Tom knows me probably a little bit better
Councilman Laufenburger Your voice has good strength to it Mayor
Gary Van Eyll I m not one to be quiet and I am I have asked questions and we are working in directions
that probably makes people a little bit uncomfortable there right now meaning staff a little bit and asking why we do things Not just doing them because we ask why
Councilman Laufenburger Okay And your term is a 2 year term or a 4 year term
Gary Van Eyll It is a 4 year term or until the Governor doesn t like me anymore and he can say goodbye
Councilman Laufenburger Alright thank you Gary That s all I had Mr Mayor
Gary Van Eyll You re welcome
5
86
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
Mayor Furlong Any other comments I guess Mr Van Eyll just a couple things and you re right we ve
known each other a long time I think your hair was darker and my head was fuller at that time but I think
it was
Gary Van Eyll And we both might have been just a little bit thinner
Mayor Furlong Perhaps Perhaps But I think over that time clearly our two cities I say our two cities
When you were mayor of Chaska Chaska and Chanhassen certainly had a great opportunities to work together and I want to thank you publicly for your role in that and that s where having those
relationships which we ve talked about before is going to be critical and helpful to you developing those
relationships at the Met Council now because that s how things get done ultimately
Gary Van Eyll I think we both realize that along with Victoria when we sat down that first meeting over
here at Byerly s and sat down at breakfast and say what the heck are we going to do We knew that we had to do
Mayor Furlong He s revealing way too many secrets Confidence from the beginning as I recall but
that s my memory
Gary Van Eyll Well that s not the way I recall it
Mayor Furlong But I think as you and I have talked about just within the last few months with Mayor
Windschitl from Chaska and I and that is in this area of transportation needs are critical and when we talk about planning planning for the transportation needs of your district Our cities Carver County I know
Scott County you re hearing a lot from them I m sure as well in terms of both roads regional priorities for roads as well as transit services with the opt out Southwest Transit Shakopee Prior Lake and even
Minnesota Valley Transit Services
Gary Van Eyll I think those are probably two of the two of the subjects that my voice has been the
loudest in and working together with a couple of the other counties or districts where it s out there like
Anoka and other counties like that so yes we are talking about that
Mayor Furlong Excellent Excellent Very good Thank you for coming this evening We appreciate it
Gary Van Eyll Thank you very much for the opportunity
Mayor Furlong And for your service
Gary Van Eyll I appreciate that and
Councilman McDonald Well if I could
Mayor Furlong Oh I m sorry
Councilman McDonald Yeah you brought up the subject You re out seeing the city councils and those things Are you going out to the you know the opt out transits like Southwest Transit Are you talking
with their boards and you know bringing them up to speed on what s going on because there s a lot of
things going on right now that Met Council seems to be at ground zero as far as the future of the opt out s
Gary Van Eyll We are working together with the opt out s The staff is working together with the staff
We are working together with the board We will be meeting here in December with a couple of the other
6
87
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
opt out s Myself and some of the other council members on that represent the opt out s We ll be
working together just to get disseminate some of the information and to work together to get some of that
together so yes we are doing something on that We are not just sitting there on our hands
Councilman McDonald Well I would certainly invite you to come to one of the board meetings
especially for Southwest Transit and talk to the board members and get the perspective from that viewpoint as to you know where we re at as far as transit and what the Met Council could do to help
Gary Van Eyll Yes I have gone to a couple of their board meetings and heard their perspective let s put
it that way
Councilman McDonald Okay thank you
Gary Van Eyll You re welcome
Mayor Furlong Thank you
Gary Van Eyll You re very welcome I do have some cards here I ll pass them down to
Councilmember McDonald if he could pass them out there My number s on there If you have anything give me a call Thank you very much
Mayor Furlong Thank you very much Is there anyone else that would like to address the council under
visitor presentations this evening If not then we ll move on to items on our agenda this evening
NOWLING VARIANCE APPEAL REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A SINGLE FAMILY HOME 6829 YUMA DRIVE APPLICANT PETER TRICIA NOWLING
Mayor Furlong This was actually was at the Planning Commission and as I understand it was approved but it has been appealed The approval has been appealed to the City Council What I d like to do this
evening is start with a staff report to give the council background and then invite the individual that is
appealing the Planning Commission s decision to come forward and address the council on matters of concern and then to the extent that the applicants the Nowling s are here they may want to present or
staff may have some be able to answer some questions if that makes sense to everybody So Ms
Aanenson let s start with the staff report please
Kate Aanenson Thank you Mayor members of the City Council As you indicated this is a request by the applicant for variances to allow the construction of a single family home on a non conforming lot
This is a lot of record which is zoned residential single family A traditional single family residential lot
is 15 000 square feet This lot is 8 936 feet but it is a lot of record and it does have can apply for
reasonable use of the property This item did appear before the Planning Commission for a public hearing th on October 18 as you indicated I think there was some confusion The Chairman did introduce the
item Asked for a public hearing I think there was some confusion of when someone was supposed to
get up but the Planning Commission did vote 6 to 0 to approve the variance request So I think the neighbors felt that they weren t able to be heard therefore the process is to appeal the request which they
did in a timely manner and that is why this item is before you tonight To appeal the decision Anybody aggrieved of a decision So with that again the request is for the side yard variance a rear yard Let s
see I m sorry The request is for a 18 foot setback on Yuma It s a three cornered lot which also is a
little bit different A proposed setback of 9 feet off of Ringo and then from the southern property line a drainage swale and easement from the back which does meet the setback so it s on the Yuma Drive and
the Ringo Drive that it needs the setback variances So again Carver Beach has a lot of different lot
configuration because the lots that were created a number of years ago were very small So they were
7
88
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
some with a lot of different matter so while the standard lot created today would be 15 000 square feet
back in 1927 when a lot of these lots were created there s just a minutia of all different types of lots So
this lot was assembled with about 5 different lots added to it to create the lot of record that it is today The 8 936 square feet In looking at the subdivision when or excuse me for the variance when this came
in it was noted that there s drainage on the lot When the applicants the Nowling s first came in it was
believed that they only needed a variance on one street side and so in looking at that and actually doing a site visit it was determined that there s a drainage swale on the back of the lot and you can see the
pictures here Existing drainage swale Therefore the lot had to be pushed forward more and because it had to be pushed forward more from this original plan I m going to go back to this slide You can see
the drainage swale then in here It required additional variance And that was through no fault of their
own of the drainage swale being on the site So with that going through that with the Planning Commission so you can see the original proposal showing the drainage So this would have been the
only variance requested Considering it was a small lot they met the standards of the minimum home
size It only needed the one variance on the three cornered lot Because there s three corners each would need the 30 foot setback Now we measure these also from the eaves We don t take them from the
foundation so any overhang would also be included in the required setback but because of the drainage swale the engineering department wanted the house pushed forward so it required that additional
drainage Excuse me additional setback variance So with that and the ability for the applicant to put
additional berming there to control the runoff would be what the condition that was added through the staff that the Planning Commission concurred with Staff felt that this was a reasonable request based on
the lot of record of that size and a reasonable sized home on that lot So a condition was that the drainage
there d be 3 feet of separation So the applicant did work to revise their plans and based on the original
proposal to meet that The 3 foot separation and constructing a berm on the south of the property to protect the neighboring property and then also provided drainage easement over that property so they ve
agreed to all those conditions So with that the Planning Commission did recommend approval of the variances subject to the conditions in the staff report and they did approve that So with that because it s
being appealed we d also recommend that the City Council concur with those recommendations
Mayor Furlong Alright thank you Any questions for staff at this time Mr McDonald
Councilman McDonald Yes I ve got a question Within that neighborhood are there problems with setbacks of houses Have we given variances to other properties there
Kate Aanenson Yes Throughout Carver Beach yes There s been a number of variances throughout Carver Beach
Councilman McDonald Okay
Todd Gerhardt Mayor council just to kind of add to that Carver Beach is one of our older
neighborhoods and I think Kate showed the photo of the smaller lots and Roger will tell you that once you have a lot of record you have to work with that property owner to make it buildable and in some cases
you re limited in what you can do and you have to grant a variance I know we ve worked with the
property owner on this one from a variety of different ways to try to get them to comply with all the setbacks but you still have to have a structure that is livable and has some marketability to it so this is the
best that we could come up with
Mayor Furlong Okay Alright any other questions at this time Councilwoman Ernst did you have
questions
8
89
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
Councilwoman Ernst Kate when we re talking about the separation of 3 feet for the water drainage
how so how far up to the property line does that is it 3 feet that it has to come up to the property line
How do we make sure that it doesn t exceed the 3 feet
Kate Aanenson Well it s a standard condition we have in our our ordinance says it s the lowest living
area has to be a 3 foot separation That would be between a wetland or a lake or
Councilman Laufenburger Is it a vertical separation
Mayor Furlong It s a vertical separation Are you asking about horizontal to the property line
Councilwoman Ernst I m talking about the drain path that comes down next to the property line SO
I m assuming that that s what we re talking about here right
Todd Gerhardt No
Councilwoman Ernst No
Kate Aanenson No
Councilwoman Ernst Okay so what is that one then Is that 2 feet or is it 3 feet Where the drainage
path comes close to the property
Kate Aanenson I can ask the City Engineer but it looks like it s approximately 10 feet would be the
separation from the rear of the house to where the drainage swale would be
Mayor Furlong Are you asking to the property line
Councilwoman Ernst Yeah
Kate Aanenson Oh
Mayor Furlong I mean doesn t a drainage easement goes to the property line generally doesn t it
Kate Aanenson Yeah This is the house setback here This was originally 10 feet The house shown on
here the only variance would have been off of the Ringo setback so this met it This is 10 feet so it s probably 3 times so it s probably 30 feet now from the rear of the property line Is that your question
Councilwoman Ernst Not from the rear of the property line but where it parallels the property line
Mayor Furlong You re talking about the drainage path She s asking about the drainage path What
would be the drainage easement on the south property line How close will the drainage easement go to
the south property line
Councilwoman Ernst Right
Mayor Furlong I think it goes to the property line doesn t it
Kate Aanenson Yeah it s pretty much in the same place it is today Which would be on that aerial this
is the neighboring property to the south and then this is in a ways The current culvert You can t see the
9
90
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
property line on this picture This is the culvert This is the neighboring property line so it s in this area
over here so
Mayor Furlong Can you point out the culvert on the picture on the right Yeah I see the one on the left
Is it right there on the left side of the picture on the right
Kate Aanenson It s hard to see with the trees
Councilwoman Ernst It looks like it s right here
Kate Aanenson I think it might be easier just to kind of go to maybe in this area here where it s coming through
Councilman Laufenburger Who s recommendation was it that the proposed building footprint be moved to the north
Kate Aanenson The city engineering department
Councilman Laufenburger And for what reason
Paul Oehme Mr Mayor City Council members The proposed building shift is to accommodate the
proposed future drainage along the south side of the new structure The drainage pattern more or less
follows it s current location of the proposed drainage route We wanted to try to maintain that as best as we can We ve looked at other options Sheet draining the water down Ringo Drive Bring the water up
to the north and down Yuma We looked at several different options and nothing seemed to work except for leaving the drainage consistent where it is today and trying to shift the structure north to create some
separation between that drainage and the new structure
Councilman Laufenburger So if I read this correctly the elevation at the beginning of the drain along
Ringo Drive is 992 5 and the elevation where it exits the property on the southwest corner by Yuma is
approximately 987 So you ve got 5 feet of drainage there and you didn t want a house getting in the way of whatever water might
Kate Aanenson That s correct
Councilman Laufenburger Is that really what you re doing
Paul Oehme Try to separate that
Councilman Laufenburger So you re taking the house out of the river
Paul Oehme Correct
Councilwoman Ernst Excuse me but if I could go back to my question that I m still not clear on how far
that comes up to the property line The drainage path
Paul Oehme The drainage path Well if you look at the south the proposed house where it s currently
proposed it s approximately 28 feet from the south property line there The drainage path is roughly right in the middle of that so you know 14 feet
Mayor Furlong To the
10
91
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
Paul Oehme From the proposed house to the drainage swale
Councilwoman Ernst Right
Paul Oehme It s about 14 feet from that south property
Mayor Furlong Does it follow the red arrows on this picture
Kate Aanenson Yes
Paul Oehme Correct yes Just follow the red arrows
Councilwoman Ernst So next to the property line that s next to this development is how many feet from that drainage
Paul Oehme Yep from the property line to where the swale s proposed is about 14 feet
Councilwoman Ernst Yeah I can t see the footage though on how
Kate Aanenson Let me just back up Currently this is how the property is draining So nothing s
changing on that
Mayor Furlong What are what views What s the direction we re looking at with those views
Kate Aanenson So this is the current this is the current culvert right now It s not being moved This is
how the water runs right now It runs in the same place Until we went out and physically observed it
we walk every variance Go out and observe it Then we say well the house has to be moved out of that drainage swale so the drainage swale is still in the same location The house is now being pushed forward
out of so an additional variance to push it to create the separation between the current drainage
Councilwoman Ernst Okay so I was out and looked at the property as well so where that property so
where that drainage is today is where it s going to stay right That drainage path
Paul Oehme Approximately
Kate Aanenson Approximately
Paul Oehme The drainage pattern approximately is going to stay in it s current location
Councilwoman Ernst And how do we make sure that that doesn t change
Paul Oehme We ve tried to put in as many safeguards into the design as we can The biggest improvement that we re proposing under this design is to create a berm on that south property line
Under the new proposal it s about 3 to 4 feet higher than the structure to the south there so channelizing that water away from that structure Creating a berm there to make sure the water moves as quickly and
efficiently to the east or to the west as possible and not impacting the that south property
Kate Aanenson And if I may there s one other safeguard With every building permit then before they
get the occupancy they would also have to submit the as built survey and that s something that
engineering would review so they have to shoot the grades and demonstrate that they ve met the
11
92
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
requirements of that and so that is they ve put security down for that to make sure that they design and
finish it as per plan
Councilwoman Ernst Okay
Kate Aanenson So that is a requirement too Test that check
Councilwoman Ernst Thank you Another question I have is the setback So when we re talking about these small setbacks like this from 30 feet to 12 feet I actually I saw in here that they re considering
Ringo Drive to not be a public road But when I was out observing this site I noticed there were multiple
cars that were using that road as a public road So I m just curious is there why is not considered a public road
Kate Aanenson The setbacks are being measured back from a public street It s not an improved street so
Mayor Furlong I thought I saw in the staff report is it public right of way
Kate Aanenson It s public right of way but it s not an improved street People are using it as a private kind of you know access but it s not an improved public street It is a public it is a right of way
Todd Gerhardt Mayor council we ve talked about gating it off and the neighborhood has used it as an
access route in the past It s not improved It s city right of way We monitor it so nobody stores or makes improvements into the right of way and but I m not surprised if you saw people using it They
kind of use it as a rear access an alley and most of the homes have been designed and laid out as if it was a public street so that s how we used it We have no plans in the near future to upgrade it but there s also
no desire to see it being vacated either
Councilwoman Ernst Does that mean that the residents that have Ringo Drive as an address then that
their address would change if that s ever gated off
Todd Gerhardt No
Councilwoman Ernst Just because the road is there and not being used doesn t mean it can t have an address with that I assume
Todd Gerhardt We have no plans of gating it
Councilwoman Ernst Okay
Todd Gerhardt People have requested that it be gated
Councilwoman Ernst With this setback then and we talk about this part of Chanhassen being an area where we have concerns for water runoff with this kind of a setback it concerns me that we re opening it
out for more of that to happen because this lot is fairly close to the lake and so I guess I ve just never seen one come through where we re asking for that much of a variance
Kate Aanenson Well actually the only variance they re asking but for the fact that there was a drainage swale there they only needed the one but because we asked them to move the house forward based on
the fact that they met our standards for a 2 car garage and met our minimum lot size the only other
12
93
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
variance they needed was the front yard Excuse me the setback on the two side streets Otherwise they
would have only needed the one so
Todd Gerhardt Mayor council another point of reference on this that you should be aware of is that
there is not a drainage easement over this lot so right now the water is draining across a private
individual s lot and you know with this variance and development we re making the situation much better by directing the water off of the existing home and following a swale between the existing home and the
new home But right now that property owner you know I don t want to give him any advice
Councilwoman Ernst Okay
Mayor Furlong Any other questions
Councilwoman Ernst No
Councilman Laufenburger Just one The picture of the culvert can you go to that Okay on the left Now can you go back one slide and show us where is that culvert located right now
Kate Aanenson It s right here
Councilman Laufenburger Okay
Kate Aanenson This is the culvert coming through
Councilman Laufenburger Okay go back to the picture then In this picture on the right is that the southerly property line
Kate Aanenson That would be the
Mayor Furlong Which direction are we looking on that picture on the right
Kate Aanenson Isn t that on the east side
Councilman Laufenburger So the picture is taking in a northwesterly direction is that correct
Kate Aanenson Correct Right yeah
Mayor Furlong Along Ringo
Kate Aanenson Well we d be facing Ringo because it s coming off
Mayor Furlong I m talking the picture on the Ringo would be behind the bushes On the right side the
picture on the right
Todd Gerhardt The person taking the picture is from Yuma
Councilwoman Ernst Right
Todd Gerhardt And looking up the property line to Ringo
Councilman Laufenburger In a east northeast direction
13
94
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
Todd Gerhardt Yes You can see the existing home to the right If you click back Kate there s the
existing home with the trailer so it s draining and heading east
Councilman Laufenburger So Ringo is in that picture on the right Ringo is off in the distance
Todd Gerhardt Yeah behind those two trees behind the trailer
Councilman Laufenburger Okay got it
Mayor Furlong Any other questions for staff At this time Okay I m sorry did you have one
Councilman Laufenburger I m just having a hard time picturing that culvert is Ringo because
Councilwoman Ernst says that Ringo is a drive then there s public use on there and on top of that culvert there s trees
Councilwoman Ernst Well it s actually not on top of it It s like behind it
Kate Aanenson So here s the lot as it sits So this is what we re talking about coming through
Todd Gerhardt The culvert is underneath the dirt and then it outlets onto the lot
Councilman Laufenburger Okay well
Kate Aanenson So you can see here this is a 40 foot right of way unimproved
Councilman Laufenburger Yep Yep
Mayor Furlong Okay Mr Bob Moore was the gentleman that filed the appeal if I m correct with that
Is he here or his representative like to address the council Good evening
Bob Moore Good evening I m Bob Moore at 6839 Yuma Drive
Mayor Furlong Okay Thank you
Bob Moore That s right
Mayor Furlong Well
Bob Moore Well you said you have to address what you have to say who you are
Mayor Furlong Yes and thank you for name and address Perfect Thank you
Bob Moore Well you answered a lot of the questions and but if you look at the picture where you see
the drainage way and you see the trailer
Mayor Furlong Let s go to that if we can Ms Aanenson
Bob Moore I will explain that to you real quick See the drainage way there where the water comes out
Mayor Furlong You re on the left picture
14
95
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
Bob Moore The property line is to the right about 8 10 feet Somewhere in there I don t have the exact
measurement So that s my property line That s my trailer To the south of that which would be to your right about 8 10 feet
Mayor Furlong Okay
Bob Moore And it goes up and then it angles over to that culvert Where it goes up and sort of stops and then it angles over to the culvert and the culvert comes through there s some trees and directly on the side
of the trees is where the road is
Mayor Furlong Okay
Bob Moore Where those trees are so that comes about 3 feet or so in from the road I m guessing about where the road ends
Mayor Furlong Okay Good Okay good
Bob Moore If that helps you out a little bit on that part
Mayor Furlong That does I guess I d be interested and I m sure the council would be too in terms of
the basis for your appeal of the Planning Commission s decision If you d like to address the council on
those factors now as well
Bob Moore Yeah The question I have is is when is it when you request a variance when is it too close to build a house to the road because that is like a city street because you plow it and maintain it and I ve
always thought it was a city street And they say it s not sort of a city street I sort of don t know what it
is What is in a city street and when I take a look and says you want to put a house 9 feet from a street the front of the house from one street is very small The other street there the other side is only you re
talking 9 foot variance and the one 18 feet from the front The house is right next to the road in the front
Very little front yard Very little back yard and the south side where the drainage is it says in the thing here that the City s going to said they had to have have to give a 15 foot what s the word I ve got it
written kind of highlighted here Easement
Mayor Furlong Easement Drainage easement yep
Bob Moore To maintain that waterway so basically from my property line 15 feet north that nothing
could be ever put into there That makes even the lot even smaller You really don t have any yard to
speak of and I question 9 feet from the city street That s pretty close for a house Now I have no
problems you know the front variance is 18 feet That s closer other houses in the neighborhood they re closer to the roads but when you start talking 9 feet you know what is the City Council s policy on or
feeling on that Do you feel that this area is exempt from all the rules I mean there are parts of the city
you don t give variance to You don t let them build within that feet My neighbor across the street wanted to build a deck and wanted to encroach just a little bit into the 30 feet in the front and he says zero
inches You can t encroach so he had to angle the deck So that was what my big question and the water drainage you ve been discussing
Mayor Furlong Okay
15
96
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
Bob Moore So there s not much more and I m very concerned about the water being you know right
now I don t have any water problems Never have I have a sump pool in my house and over 30 plus
years we ve never had a drop of water
Mayor Furlong Okay
Bob Moore So I m concerned about the water that they re plus on the side of my garage there if it does
drain into that drainage ditch from the side of the garage and that little back area comes down
Mayor Furlong It goes north to the drainage ditch
Bob Moore Yep Yep That whole area there does drain Now you re going to put a berm there you
know how you going to berm and put the water through
Mayor Furlong Okay
Bob Moore So I m very concerned about that
Mayor Furlong Okay I guess let s get one of those questions at a time here
Kate Aanenson Sure The measurement while it s 9 feet from the property line from the edge of the
bituminous you add another 12 feet so that s where this additional property would come in so that s the
current and like I said there s no intention right now to improve that street beyond what it is When I say improve make it wider bigger than what it is right now so So in effect it s 9 10 feet from the excuse
me Go to this one 11 feet here 11 feet but you re actually
Mayor Furlong That s from the property line but the property line doesn t go all the way up to the
Kate Aanenson Yeah that is the property line but then you go all the way up to the edge of the
improvements so you add another 12 14 feet til you get to the pavement where it s actually being plowed
so it s not that close to the plowed area just to be clear
Mayor Furlong Right
Kate Aanenson And again as the City Manager mentioned the water is currently being directed across
this property Private property so our intent now is to get an easement Anybody that has an easement on their property uses it towards their green space or they have the right to use that property While the City
may have utilities under that easement whether it s sewer water telephone cable they have a right to
that s still part of their green space Part of their property so that adds to their green space over their
managing some of that water part of it So the goal here was to get an actual easement for that Control it Redirect it and where it s going manage that in a more controlled path and looking at where the
current pavement width is Again working with again a reasonable sized home on that lot
Mayor Furlong Okay Does that make sense Mr Moore with regard to the setback It s to the property
line not necessarily to the pavement where cars are currently driving and it s being plowed So it adds an additional you said what was that distance
Kate Aanenson About another 12 feet
Mayor Furlong 12 feet okay
16
97
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
Kate Aanenson To the actual pavement width
Mayor Furlong Alright
Bob Moore Is the front the same way
Kate Aanenson Yeah because this is the edge of the property line Then when you actually look at
where the you can see on the survey here it says the edge of the pavement is further away So it adds another 12 feet
Bob Moore Okay
Mayor Furlong So as with many streets the right of way is wider than where the current pavement and
where the plowed area is
Kate Aanenson Correct Correct
Bob Moore And that would be in the front the same way
Kate Aanenson Well it is on Ringo On the front you meet the setbacks on Cree
Bob Moore But I mean on Yuma it s the same way
Kate Aanenson Yes actually the roadway is here right So the setback to the street is 20 feet and then
you actually have another 10 feet or so before to actually before you get to the pavement
Mayor Furlong The physical street is narrower than the right of way
Kate Aanenson Correct
Bob Moore Okay
Mayor Furlong On all of those And then with regard to the berm that s being requested Mr Oehme
where s if you could show us where is that berm planned to be located
Paul Oehme Yeah so the drainage swale is coming through here with the red arrows again and the berm is planned for at this location right here so and actually on this drawing the berm is
Kate Aanenson It has been revised
Paul Oehme It has been revised and it s actually extended out farther than it s shown right here so
currently or the proposal is for that berm to be about 3 1 2 higher than the existing grade at this location
right here in front of the house so it s improving the drainage along the property line here and directing the water away from the property to the south and making sure it discharges onto Yuma before going on
private property
Mayor Furlong So what Mr Moore is concerned about causing problems to the water flow that flows
north off his property into this area is this is the swale going to or the berm going to restrict that or is it going or not
Paul Oehme The water s not going to be restricted It s going to actually
17
98
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
Mayor Furlong The water flowing from the property to the south flowing north will be able to continue
to do that as it does currently
Paul Oehme Correct
Kate Aanenson All the same path
Paul Oehme Right it will follow the same path Actually the drainage swales will be wider wider than
it is currently today to warrant capacity as well so
Todd Gerhardt Mayor
Kate Aanenson Excuse me this is the revised plan It s a little harder to read but this is showing the corrected berm It s one of the conditions that the Planning Commission asked for
Todd Gerhardt I think Mr Moore s question was about his drainage also Will his drainage go into that
existing ditch so his won t be altered So his would naturally drain the way it is today then
Paul Oehme Correct and the water would not go flow to the north It will still flow to I believe the to
the west
Todd Gerhardt To Yuma
Paul Oehme To Yuma
Todd Gerhardt So it would get down into that ditch You don t plan on filling that ditch in as a part of
this
Paul Oehme No not at this time I think in 4 to 5 years we re looking at a street improvement project in
this area and we re looking at maybe addressing some of those issues in this area but under this proposal we re not looking at addressing the drainage at this time
Mayor Furlong Were those all your questions
Bob Moore Yep
Mayor Furlong Okay
Bob Moore Thank you
Mayor Furlong Alright thank you I m sorry Mr Moore You re satisfied with the answers to those
questions as well
Bob Moore Yeah the best you can answer them
Mayor Furlong Okay alright Very good
Bob Moore And during construction and everything someone will make sure that everything stays
open
18
99
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
Kate Aanenson Yes Yeah there should be erosion control and the like and if there s not then someone
should certainly feel free to call us
Mayor Furlong And that would be part of the building permit process I assume with the variance
request Okay alright The public hearing was held at the Planning Commission but understanding now
there was perhaps some misunderstanding If there s anybody else that would like to provide public comment on this I d certainly welcome to the podium at this time And assume the Nowling s may be
here as well so if there s anything you feel you want to say that s fine Don t feel obligated Good evening
Bruce Barrington I m Bruce Barrington 6869 Yuma
Mayor Furlong Good evening
Bruce Barrington I ve been living in this area for about 35 years or so and I know the amount of water
that you re talking you re talking just from Cree and so on like that but there are properties that are farther up the road that drain in this same area and the roads that we have Yuma Drive gets dug out
every year and I spoke to one of the maintenance guys from the City and he said they re going to put in a
new road next year so they improve some of the road by patching and so on like that Now by next spring those patches will be washed away so I m just what he s saying There s lot of water that has to come
through there And secondly I m kind of wondering how many of the council members actually
physically looked at this property to see what it looks like before it came to council and that s about my
only two questions
Councilwoman Ernst I did I live there
Mayor Furlong Okay thank you Mr Oehme with regard to his question on street improvements
Paul Oehme Yeah and again the staff and the City Council the City s looking at making some
improvements in this area especially on Yuma Drive to address some of that drainage concerns and
address some of the street condition concerns as well so there is about an acre of area north of this property that does drain through that culvert Staff has looked at the capacity of that culvert and the
drainage swale that s being proposed and we feel that the those improvements are adequate to handle the
current and the future drainage through this area You know where the water goes on Yuma we re not looking at again making any changes at this time but in the future we are looking at trying to make the
drainage patterns in this area better
Mayor Furlong And with regard to his comments about the making some improvements is that
something we re continuing to patch and repair process until I think you mentioned 4 to 5 years there may
be something more improvements in this area
Paul Oehme Yeah right I mean you know we re out patching the Carver Beach area roads on a yearly
basis The roads are to the condition where they pothole and there s a lot of defects and the roads really do need to be improved here You know a lot of it can be contributed to the condition of the and the age
of the roadway system but some of it can be contributed also to the drainage system in this area as well so you know in conjunction with that street improvement project we do definitely want to put in you
know look at putting in culverts or storm sewer systems and trying to treat the water a little better than it
is currently handled at this time so
Mayor Furlong Okay And that water improvements will be part of the street project when that s put
forth
19
100
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
Paul Oehme Yep absolutely Absolutely Every time we go into a neighborhood and propose a street
improvement project we always look at what the condition of the utilities are What s the drainage issues that are in this area Try to package a project together so we re out here once making those
improvements
Mayor Furlong Alright thank you Any other public comments this evening No Okay thank you
Any other follow up questions for council Any comments by council with regard to the proposal in front of us Is our we make a motion
Kate Aanenson Yes you would I m sorry I have actually
Mayor Furlong Okay The action to be taken either approval of denial Not necessarily
Kate Aanenson Yeah you re affirming
Mayor Furlong Of the original application just to be clear Not the appeal but the original application
Kate Aanenson Yeah you re approving the Planning Commission s recommendation with the variance
Mayor Furlong Approving or denying
Kate Aanenson Yep
Mayor Furlong But I mean it s of the original application is our motion
Councilwoman Ernst Mayor I m sorry I do have one question
Mayor Furlong Councilwoman Ernst
Councilwoman Ernst Paul when you were talking about this project can you give me an idea like if say for example there s a real problem out there this coming spring what is there anything we can do
temporarily to help that situation out there
Paul Oehme Absolutely I mean if we know that there is a drainage issue out here say a clogged pipe or
a drainage ditch that s filled in with sediment we d try to be as proactive as we can to address that situation before spring runoff So there s you know if there s anything that we can do to temporarily
improve the situation you know it d be helpful to know that
Councilwoman Ernst Okay thank you
Mayor Furlong Discussion comments on the application Or the proposed variance request Mr
McDonald
Councilman McDonald Well I guess you know I normally do not support variances but you know one of the things for variances whether or not you can enjoy the property and I d say without these
accommodations yeah it s going to be pretty hard to build a house on there The one gentleman brought
up the thing about the decks Well decks are not necessary A house is That s probably one of the reasons why a deck would get turned down That doesn t stop you from enjoyment of your property So
I mean in this case because of the unique circumstances and it sounds as though we ve got the drainage
under control I d be in favor of approving the variance in this particular case
20
101
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
Mayor Furlong Thank you Any other comments Discussion My thoughts are similar I think
whenever we look at variance requests and the issue came up you know what s reasonable How far will you go And I think in each case it s a facts and circumstances situation so therefore unfortunately the
answer is it depends It depends on the specific facts and circumstances around the area and what are the
different effects I know Councilwoman Ernst lives in the neighborhood We ve worked with a number of residents over the years to try to accommodate requests and to the extent that they re reasonable in
terms of people constructing homes Improving their property in the Carver Beach area and it s a wonderful part of our city It s certainly one of those areas that has a lot of character and is an asset to the
city but it also has it s challenges and when we looked at the old plat that there were 6 or 7 individual lots
that make up now a lot of under 9 000 square feet there are challenges throughout I think the key here is when we look at a variance there are standards we have to follow Is it consistent and in harmony with
the comprehensive plan I think the answer is yes The comprehensive plan has these areas for single
family homes That s what s being requested Is there are there practical difficulties with the lot to meet all the zoning requirements I think the answer is clearly yes there I think the best example there I saw
was the triangle The red triangle on the lot To try to squeeze something in there clearly practical difficulties for a lot of this size this shape and surrounded by three roads Three right of ways Public
right of ways Clearly there are some unique aspects to this property that aren t created by the owner
Aren t self created issues but they re practical aspects that need to be considered And so then is it is it a reasonable request to build a single family home I think what I do appreciate is the property owner s
willingness to work with the staff to try to improve the drainage in this area where we have those
opportunities As Councilwoman Ernst said and others recognize in this neighborhood when we have
opportunities to make some improvements we try to do that and the City s always tried to do that I do appreciate Mr Moore s concerns regarding how those changes may affect water flow across his property
and I m very glad to hear that there should be no change to the water flow across his property or from his property to the existing drainage area so it seems to me and as Mr McDonald said that there are this is
a reasonable accommodation for all concerned and I think it s for the council should go ahead and
approve the planning case with the variances subject to the Findings of Fact and conditions in the staff report If there are no other comments would somebody like to make a motion
Councilwoman Tjornhom I ll make the motion
Mayor Furlong Councilwoman Tjornhom thank you
Councilwoman Tjornhom I d like to make a motion that the Chanhassen City Council approves the
Planning Case 2011 10 for the construction of a single family home with variances subject to the conditions of the staff report and the adoption of the Findings of Fact and Decision
Mayor Furlong Thank you Is there a second
Councilman McDonald I ll second
Mayor Furlong Motion s been made and seconded Any discussion on the motion Hearing none we ll proceed with the vote
Councilwoman Tjornhom moved Councilman McDonald seconded that the Chanhassen City
Council approves Planning Case 2011 10 for the construction of a single family home with
variances subject to the conditions of the staff report and the adoption of the Findings of Fact and Decision All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0
Mayor Furlong Thank you everybody We appreciate your participation
21
102
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
Mayor Furlong Are there any council presentations
Councilman Laufenburger Mr Mayor
Mayor Furlong Yes
Councilman Laufenburger I took the liberty of visiting the Chanhassen Rec Center on the Thursday th evening the 10 of November when a time during which Mediacom was conducting their open house for this community and spoke with a couple representatives from Mediacom and they were very pleased that
something over 250 customers visited their open house during the day primarily to receive the digital
adapters that are used on TV s to ensure that the consumer can get the digital signal even if their TV is not equipped with digital so that was something that we had been told about earlier this year in June and I
was pleased to see that Mediacom followed through not only in Chanhassen but many other communities that they serve and there seemed to be good turnout amongst the consumers so I thought it was a good
event
Mayor Furlong Great Thank you Any other council presentations Just to share with the council I th was invited to speak to at the Chanhassen High School a week ago this evening on the 7 at the induction
for the National Honor Society for Chanhassen High School and there were 70 students that were
induction into the National Honor Society which is one of largest groups that they ve had there The requirements is more for induction is more than just good GPA although that s part of it but it s also an
organization that promotes leadership service and strong moral character and so it was great to be a part of that event and good to see so many students and their families Students being recognized and their
families there too to honor them so that was a fun event That was a fun event as well Mr Gerhardt any
administrative presentations this evening
ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
Todd Gerhardt I ve got a couple Staff met with the Minnewashta Heights neighborhood for the street
reconstruction that s planned for this coming spring and positive meeting You know probably most
interest that we had was in regards to storm water management Nothing different than what we heard tonight and again a neighborhood with minimal curb and gutter and how to manage that water runoff so
Paul and his team are working on a plan to accommodate the needs Trees were not too much of an issue There s a couple of significant ones that they want to keep an eye on and access to the property during
construction was another concern so we ll be bringing this back in the near future for an overall review
for the council for the project and start looking at design here in the coming year Second thing just to
make the council aware the Mayor is going to be speaking this Wednesday at a chamber event Reminder for all the mayor and council on that and going to be giving the State of the City address along
with the City of Chaska Carver Victoria and Chanhassen so it s always well attended to see what s going
on in the other communities and great opportunity for us to tell about our accomplishments and the things that we re working on so that s all I have
Mayor Furlong Thank you Any questions for Mr Gerhardt Or staff No
CORRESPONDENCE PACKET None
22
103
Chanhassen City Council November 14 2011
Mayor Furlong We will be as we adjourn our council meeting here we will be continuing our work
session items this evening in the fountain conference room and picking up the work session where we
recessed If there s nothing else to come before the council this evening is there a motion to adjourn
Councilman Laufenburger So moved
Mayor Furlong Is there a second
Councilwoman Ernst Second
Mayor Furlong Thank you Motion s been made and seconded
Councilman Laufenburger moved Councilwoman Ernst seconded to adjourn the meeting All
voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0 The City Council meeting was adjourned at 8 10 p m
Submitted by Todd Gerhardt
City Manager
Prepared by Nann Opheim
23
104
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
SUMMARY MINUTES
NOVEMBER 1 2011
Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7 00 p m
MEMBERS PRESENT Andrew Aller Mark Undestad Tom Doll Kathleen Thomas Kevin Ellsworth
Kim Tennyson and Lisa Hokkanen
STAFF PRESENT Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Paul Oehme City
Engineer Public Works Director Alyson Fauske Assistant City Engineer Sharmeen Al Jaff Senior
Planner and Todd Gerhardt City Manager
PUBLIC PRESENT
Mark Giancola
Mary Rubai
Marjorie Jesse Knight
Steven L Cohen Allyson Segar Cohen
Gary Disch
Dan Mertes
Brad Karels
Anne Bill Fisher
Dorothy Downing
Linda Landsman
Larry Pastorek
Gary Theis
Sarah Thomas
Julia Seper
Janice Schulter
Candance G Carlson
Karen Walker
Sandra Resnik
Brenda Witzig
Joyce Arlt
Dan Mahady
John Kunitz
Joe Desiree Nozling
Jackie Doug Jacobson
Scott Marcia Hippen
Bob Susan Seward
Sheryl Mickelsen
Adele Pint
Chris Miller
Kirsten McBeken
Steve Taborek
Mark Arrington
Tonya Stier
Kristi Strang
Kurt Kuhlmann
8441 Rosewood Drive
7340 Frontier Trail
2014 Clover Court
7022 Sandy Hook Circle
8170 Marsh Drive
8671 Flamingo Drive
8105 Dakota Lane
1321 Lake Drive West 4225
7200 Juniper Avenue Excelsior
7329 Frontier Trail
7071 Shawnee Lane
1696 Valley Ridge Trail North
2555 Longacres Drive
1081 Lake Lucy Road
8691 Chanhassen Hills Drive North
7720 Arboretum Village Circle
7591 Walnut Curve
7370 Kurvers Point
9520 Washington Boulevard 43
8434 Burlwood Drive
1020 Butte Court
6441 Bretton Way
8410 West Lake Drive
1121 Dove Court
7017 Cheyenne Trail
8031 Cheyenne Trail
981 Pontiac Lane
1641 Koehnen Circle
8401 West Lake Drive
1401 Field Creek Circle Victoria
8022 Cheyenne Avenue
870 Lake Susan Hills Drive
9200 Ellendale Lane
1701 Valley Ridge Trail South
8445 Powers Place
105
Planning Commission Summary November 1 2011
Alan Barb Johnson
John Jennifer Bentz
Kelly Woods
Patrick Rutledge
Shelley Kerber
Chris Robinson
David Enright
Kurt Weimer
Susan Rian Nobel
Irene Oberstar
Rick Dorsey
Ted Lamson
Christine Meier
Robby Virnig
Margaret DiMarco
John Prondzinski Ridgeview Medical Center
John Karl Davis
Barry McKinney
Edwin Everett
Tim Bloudek
Pat Tom Potter
Lauren Kopp
Emily Mattran
Tim Polivany
Wayne Skoblik
Jean Dale Rusch
Rich Gavert
Scott B Haas
Barry Anita Steckling
Paul Darlene Ryan
Lee Kaufman
Linda Boerboom
J Wagle
Bruce VonOrnum
Kathi Cadmus
Jane Gharbi
Curt Kobilaresik
Sue Bogan
George Beinik
Debra Pladsen
Lana Doug Haberman
Dave Mayer
Karen Zellner
Christoph Leser
Colleen Cannon
Darlene Loving
Ronald Cynthia Tonn
James Hastreiter
Brian Bole
Chris Johnson
G Dye
700 Lake Susan Hills Drive
9840 Deerbrook Drive
850 Lake Susan Hills Drive
7568 Walnut Curve
6025 Whitney Circle
7900 Market Boulevard
795 Ponderosa Drive
6211 Dogwood Avenue
7100 Tecumseh Lane
2170 Baneberry Way West
14215 Green View Court Eden Prairie
680 Lake Susan Hills Drive
8437 Rosewood Drive
26380 Shorewood Oaks Drive Shorewood
1131 Dove Court
500 So Maple Street Waconia
8200 West Lake Court
8046 Cheyenne Avenue
6301 Near Mountain Boulevard
1171 Homestead Lane
6531 Devonshire Drive
8020 Hidden Circle
8210 West Lake Court
181 Fox Hollow Drive
409 Del Rio Drive
2856 Century Trail
7701 Frontier Trail
7264 Pontiac Circle
8320 West Lake Court
8310 West Lake Court
300 Hidden Lane
8261 West Lake Court
8411 Egret Court
8150 Hidden Court
8426 Stone Creek Court
1401 Crest Drive
9149 Springfield Drive
7757 Buttercup Court
412 West 76 Street
1490 Heron Drive
520 Pleasant View Road
8726 Flamingo Drive
7616 Frontier Trail
8110 Marsh Drive
8110 Marsh Drive
7112 Pontiac Circle
8300 West Lake Court
6990 Tecumseh Lane
1577 Bluebill Trail
Chanhassen
1331 Lake Drive West
106
Planning Commission Summary November 1 2011
Ben Newton 1560 Lake Susan Hills
Joseph O Connor 811 Lake Susan Hills Drive
Gloria J Cox 6990 Shawnee Lane
Tom Kraus 7744 Vasserman Trail
Terry McGinley 920 Lake Susan Hills Drive
Ellis Thomas 406 West 76 Street
John Stacey Boshacker 7428 Bent Bow Trail
Scott Paulson 634 Summerfield Lane
Mark Ploof 7040 Tecumseh Lane
Debbie Lloyd 7302 Laredo Drive
Kathleen Haas 7264 Pontiac Circle
Jackie Ottoson 7080 Harrison Hill Terrace
Lori Tollberg 6981 Pima Lane
Tim Boyce 8941 Audubon Road
Tana Erickson 8941 Audubon Road
Bob Ayotte Chanhassen
Michael Virginia Bailey 7472 Saratoga Drive
Charlie Julie Littfin 7609 Laredo Drive
Mark Flodoski 2204 Sommergate
Katie Mahannah 92 Shasta Circle East
Holly White 8657 Valley Ridge Court
Irina Osadchuk 7301 Pontiac Circle
Carmen Ried 8301 West Lake Court
Ross Huseby 1431 Heron Drive
Ana Moritz 860 Lake Susan Hills Drive
Jane Revsbech 2155 Murray Hill Court
Jack Krueger 7606 Kiowa Avenue
Greg Kelly Hastings 9217 Lake Riley Boulevard
Jay Donohue 6561 Troendle Circle
Larry White 8657 Valley Ridge Court
Bill Kelly Schulte 8420 West Lake Drive
Stephanie Fisher 1451 Heron Drive
David Elizabeth Kressler 1750 Valley Ridge Trail North
Christine Callahan 8595 Drake Court
Katherine Peterson 7713 Vasserman Place
Kent Ludford 8615 Valley View Court
Mike Boyer 2370 Bridle Creek Circle
David Kristy Brackett 1320 Lake Susan Hills Drive
PUBLIC HEARING
WALMART REQUEST FOR CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PUD
APPROVAL FOR A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF A 120 000 SOUARE FOOT
WALMART STORE ON APPROXIMATELY 14 10 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 5 AND POWERS BOULEVARD 1000 PARK ROAD
APPLICANT WALMART C O KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING CASE
2011 11
Kate Aanenson presented the staff report and background information and Paul Oehme discussed traffic
issues associated with the proposed plan Chairman Aller asked for clarification on recommendations to
change parking access points and turn lane improvements Commissioner Ellsworth asked for
clarification of the zoning and guiding for the property criteria used in the staff s findings who s going
107
Planning Commission Summary November 1 2011
to pay for infrastructure improvements to the site and water quality Commissioner Doll asked about
truck traffic through the parking lot Commissioner Tennyson asked for clarification on the difference
between regular commercial and community commercial zoning Commissioner Hokkanen asked for
clarification of the traffic study Lisa B Nelson provided background information on the Walmart
corporation and the issues that will be addressed by members of the Walmart team Chairman Aller asked
Will Matzek the engineer of record for the project to focus his presentation on the findings in the report
and the concerns of the planning staff Mike Sims the realtor working with the applicant addressed the
question of locating Walmart on this site Jackie Cook Haxby with SAIC addressed the architectural and
sustainability issues associated with the building
Chairman Aller opened the public hearing Scott Hippen 7017 Cheyenne Trail explained why he is
against Walmart moving into 1000 Park Road and asked the commission to make a recommendation that
the City Council put a moratorium on big box store development until it can establish where to put that
type of development He expressed concerns with the traffic study and impact on the nearby soccer field
Sarah Thomas 2555 Longacres Drive asked that the Planning Commission deny the request because it
does not meet the guiding of the City s comprehensive plan for this area of downtown and that Walmart
has not gone above and beyond the code before passing out and explaining a handout with tax
information Tim Bloudek 1171 Homestead Lane stated he was against this rezoning and explained his
belief that Walmart doesn t fit with his view of what the community needs or wants in a retail district
Ellis Thomas 406 West 76 Street who has lived in Chanhassen since 1967 gave an emotional plea to
keep the community the way it is Brad Karels 8105 Dakota Lane addressed the issue of environmental
impact to this site specifically non point source water pollution and solid waste concerns He asked that
every aspect of the local ecosystem be considered and if environmental protection cannot be guaranteed
that this rezoning not be recommended to the City Council Todd Neils cited information from several
studies about the assumed tax and economic impact big box stores such as Walmart have on a
community Annie Fisher who currently resides at 1321 Lake Drive West one block directly south of
Park Road where this new Walmart is proposed to go expressed concern with traffic local business
competition heighten crime rate and property values Bill Fisher 1321 Lake Drive West board member
of the Powers Ridge Homeowners Association and truck driver for Lakewinds stated his biggest concern
was with access and truck traffic David Kressler 1750 Valley Ridge Trail North asked that the Planning
Commission recommend against Walmart s proposed development in Chanhassen after discussing
Walmart s slogan that Walmart Sells for Less Always and the effect that has on small local businesses
Elizabeth Kressler 1750 Valley Ridge Trail North representing the 1 030 people that signed a petition on
www change org referenced a study done by the University of Iowa on the effects of Walmart coming
into a community Christine Callahan 8595 Drake Court addressed the Planning Commission s role in
planning development of the city and asked the commission to draw their attention to the goals and
policies in the comprehensive plan Colleen Cannon 8110 Marsh Drive discussed a study done by
Kenneth Stone Professor of Economics at Iowa State University entitled the Economic Impact of
Walmart Supercenters on Existing Businesses in Mississippi She informed the commission that she had
brought an exchange student from China to the meeting to see the democratic process in action Dave
Enright 795 Ponderosa Drive in talking about the limited physical area of the site asked where the snow
removal would go Scott Hadden an optometrist who works at the Bloomington Walmart Vision Center
explained how he would be the lease holder at the Chanhassen store discussed the type of people he sees
as patients and the positive economic impact the Bloomington Walmart has had on surrounding
businesses Bill Shubert asked about the number of full time employees the percentage of charitable
contribution compared to profit and the need to find a location that is best for the community not the best
location for Walmart Katherine Peterson 7713 Vasserman Place explained the effect of Walmart
locating in her hometown of Litchfield Margaret DiMarco 1131 Dove Court stated her concern with
increased traffic on Powers Boulevard Deb Lloyd 7302 Laredo Drive explained the ownership of the
surrounding businesses the deficiencies in the PUD proposal the fact that Walmart allows RV s to park
in their parking lot overnight and the amount of impervious surface Kent Ludford 8615 Valley View
108
Planning Commission Summary November 1 2011
Court explained his commute from his home to his place business the Ace Hardware store and his
concern with the viability of the soccer field and traffic flow Mike Boyer 2370 Bridle Creek Circle
discussed the economic study that was done in 2006 which concluded the need for about 110 000
additional square feet of retail around the center of town but asked the commission to consider that
consumer spending habits have changed since 2006 Robby Virnig 26380 Shorewood Oaks Drive in
Shorewood and an employee of Target expressed concern over losing his job due to the loss of business
with Walmart being open 24 7 Kristy Brackett 1320 Lake Susan Hills Drive which is 2 blocks from the
proposed site expressed concern with traffic noise school bus safety and lighting David Brackett 1320
Lake Susan Hills Drive explained his belief that Walmart has been known as a predatory company
Chairman Aller closed the public hearing After comments from commission members the following
motion was made
Doll moved Undestad seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends denial of
the Concept Planned Unit Development based on the Findings of the Planned Unit Development as
stated in the staff report for Planning Case 2011 11 All voted in favor and the motion carried
unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0
The Planning Commission took a short recess at this point in the meeting
APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Thomas noted the verbatim and summary minutes of the
Planning Commission meeting dated October 18 2011 as presented
COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS None
CITY COUNCIL ACTION UPDATE Kate Aanenson stated there were no planning items on the
October 26 City Council meeting and that the November 15 Planning Commission meeting was
cancelled due to lack of items
Ellsworth moved Doll seconded to adjourn the meeting All voted in favor and the motion carried
unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0 The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 9 40 p m
Submitted by Kate Aanenson
Community Development Director
Prepared by Nann Opheim
109
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 1 2011
Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7 00 p m
MEMBERS PRESENT Andrew Aller Mark Undestad Tom Doll Kathleen Thomas Kevin Ellsworth
Kim Tennyson and Lisa Hokkanen
STAFF PRESENT Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Paul Oehme City Engineer Public
Works Director Alyson Fauske Assistant City Engineer Sharmeen Al Jaff Senior Planner and Todd
Gerhardt City Manager
PUBLIC PRESENT
Mark Giancola 8441 Rosewood Drive
Mary Rubai 7340 Frontier Trail
Marjorie Jesse Knight 2014 Clover Court
Steven L Cohen Allyson Segar Cohen 7022 Sandy Hook Circle
Gary Disch 8170 Marsh Drive
Dan Mertes 8671 Flamingo Drive
Brad Karels 8105 Dakota Lane
Anne Bill Fisher 1321 Lake Drive West 4225
Dorothy Downing 7200 Juniper Avenue Excelsior
Linda Landsman 7329 Frontier Trail
Larry Pastorek 7071 Shawnee Lane
Gary Theis 1696 Valley Ridge Trail North
Sarah Thomas 2555 Longacres Drive
Julia Seper 1081 Lake Lucy Road
Janice Schulter 8691 Chanhassen Hills Drive North
Candance G Carlson 7720 Arboretum Village Circle
Karen Walker 7591 Walnut Curve
Sandra Resnik 7370 Kurvers Point
Brenda Witzig 9520 Washington Boulevard 43
Joyce Arlt 8434 Burlwood Drive
Dan Mahady 1020 Butte Court
John Kunitz 6441 Bretton Way
Joe Desiree Nozling 8410 West Lake Drive
Jackie Doug Jacobson 1121 Dove Court
Scott Marcia Hippen 7017 Cheyenne Trail
Bob Susan Seward 8031 Cheyenne Trail
Sheryl Mickelsen 981 Pontiac Lane
Adele Pint 1641 Koehnen Circle
Chris Miller 8401 West Lake Drive
Kirsten McBeken 1401 Field Creek Circle Victoria
Steve Taborek 8022 Cheyenne Avenue
Mark Arrington 870 Lake Susan Hills Drive
Tonya Stier 9200 Ellendale Lane
Kristi Strang 1701 Valley Ridge Trail South
Kurt Kuhlmann 8445 Powers Place
Alan Barb Johnson 700 Lake Susan Hills Drive
John Jennifer Bentz 9840 Deerbrook Drive
Kelly Woods 850 Lake Susan Hills Drive
Patrick Rutledge 7568 Walnut Curve
Shelley Kerber 6025 Whitney Circle
Chris Robinson 7900 Market Boulevard
110
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
David Enright
Kurt Weimer
Susan Rian Nobel
Irene Oberstar
Rick Dorsey
Ted Lamson
Christine Meier
Robby Virnig
Margaret DiMarco
John Prondzinski Ridgeview Medical Center
John Karl Davis
Barry McKinney
Edwin Everett
Tim Bloudek
Pat Tom Potter
Lauren Kopp
Emily Mattran
Tim Polivany
Wayne Skoblik
Jean Dale Rusch
Rich Gavert
Scott B Haas
Barry Anita Steckling
Paul Darlene Ryan
Lee Kaufman
Linda Boerboom
J Wagle
Bruce VonOrnum
Kathi Cadmus
Jane Gharbi
Curt Kobilaresik
Sue Bogan
George Beinik
Debra Pladsen
Lana Doug Haberman
Dave Mayer
Karen Zellner
Christoph Leser
Colleen Cannon
Darlene Loving
Ronald Cynthia Tonn
James Hastreiter
Brian Bole
Chris Johnson
G Dye
Ben Newton
Joseph O Connor
Gloria J Cox
Tom Kraus
Terry McGinley
Ellis Thomas
795 Ponderosa Drive
6211 Dogwood Avenue
7100 Tecumseh Lane
2170 Baneberry Way West
14215 Green View Court Eden Prairie
680 Lake Susan Hills Drive
8437 Rosewood Drive
26380 Shorewood Oaks Drive Shorewood
1131 Dove Court
500 So Maple Street Waconia
8200 West Lake Court
8046 Cheyenne Avenue
6301 Near Mountain Boulevard
1171 Homestead Lane
6531 Devonshire Drive
8020 Hidden Circle
8210 West Lake Court
181 Fox Hollow Drive
409 Del Rio Drive
2856 Century Trail
7701 Frontier Trail
7264 Pontiac Circle
8320 West Lake Court
8310 West Lake Court
300 Hidden Lane
8261 West Lake Court
8411 Egret Court
8150 Hidden Court
8426 Stone Creek Court
1401 Crest Drive
9149 Springfield Drive
7757 Buttercup Court
412 West 76 Street
1490 Heron Drive
520 Pleasant View Road
8726 Flamingo Drive
7616 Frontier Trail
8110 Marsh Drive
8110 Marsh Drive
7112 Pontiac Circle
8300 West Lake Court
6990 Tecumseh Lane
1577 Bluebill Trail
Chanhassen
1331 Lake Drive West
1560 Lake Susan Hills
811 Lake Susan Hills Drive
6990 Shawnee Lane
7744 Vasserman Trail
920 Lake Susan Hills Drive
406 West 76 Street
2
111
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
John Stacey Boshacker 7428 Bent Bow Trail
Scott Paulson 634 Summerfield Lane
Mark Ploof 7040 Tecumseh Lane
Debbie Lloyd 7302 Laredo Drive
Kathleen Haas 7264 Pontiac Circle
Jackie Ottoson 7080 Harrison Hill Terrace
Lori Tollberg 6981 Pima Lane
Tim Boyce 8941 Audubon Road
Tana Erickson 8941 Audubon Road
Bob Ayotte Chanhassen
Michael Virginia Bailey 7472 Saratoga Drive
Charlie Julie Littfin 7609 Laredo Drive
Mark Flodoski 2204 Sommergate
Katie Mahannah 92 Shasta Circle East
Holly White 8657 Valley Ridge Court
Irina Osadchuk 7301 Pontiac Circle
Carmen Ried 8301 West Lake Court
Ross Huseby 1431 Heron Drive
Ana Moritz 860 Lake Susan Hills Drive
Jane Revsbech 2155 Murray Hill Court
Jack Krueger 7606 Kiowa Avenue
Greg Kelly Hastings 9217 Lake Riley Boulevard
Jay Donohue 6561 Troendle Circle
Larry White 8657 Valley Ridge Court
Bill Kelly Schulte 8420 West Lake Drive
Stephanie Fisher 1451 Heron Drive
David Elizabeth Kressler 1750 Valley Ridge Trail North
Christine Callahan 8595 Drake Court
Katherine Peterson 7713 Vasserman Place
Kent Ludford 8615 Valley View Court
Mike Boyer 2370 Bridle Creek Circle
David Kristy Brackett 1320 Lake Susan Hills Drive
PUBLIC HEARING
WALMART REOUEST FOR CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PUD APPROVAL
FOR A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF A 120 000 SQUARE FOOT WALMART STORE ON
APPROXIMATELY 14 10 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
HIGHWAY 5 AND POWERS BOULEVARD 1000 PARK ROAD APPLICANT WALMART C O
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC PLANNING CASE 2011 11
Aller Welcome I m calling to order the Planning Commission meeting for the City of Chanhassen today
November 1 2011 The Planning Commission is a recommending body to the City Council We suggest you
follow the item on hand today with the City Council for final action That date is tentatively November 28
2011 Public input will be accepted when the Planning Commission opens the public hearing portion of this
item Any persons wishing to speak should come up to the podium State your name and address for the
record We have a number of individuals here tonight We also have overflow in the senior center which are
watching this live as well Those individuals over there are certainly welcome to come to the podium when
the public hearing is open to give and provide their comments to the commission The item will be
introduced Staff will make the presentation of it s report The applicant may come forward and make a
developer presentation I ll then open a public hearing for input After individuals have spoken we will close
the public hearing Commission members may make comment I will request a motion and we will act on a
112
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
motion or take other action For purposes of this evening because of the large number of individuals present
we d like to limit your comments to approximately 3 minutes We don t want to cut you off but we d like to
have everyone pay attention to the individuals and give respect to the individuals who speak before you
Listen to what they have to say Hopefully we re not repeating comments over and over and over and over
again so that we can make sure that everyone gets an opportunity to speak tonight So we thank you for
paying attention Being respectful to other speakers and with that we ll go ahead and open with the staff
presentation
Aanenson Thank you Chairman members of the Planning Commission I just want to also or maybe a
housekeeping item Typically we try to end by 10 30 Chairman so we may take a bio break somewhere in
there Kind of gauge how long the meeting s going just so the audience knows kind of can anticipate that
coming
Aller Yes in our official by laws we are expected to close at 10 30 If it s close we may extend that We
may take a motion at that time to take other action extend or to continue for further information which would
go directly to the City Council if necessary Thank you
Aanenson Alright thank you
Audience Can you turn up the mic s so we can hear you Very hard
Aanenson Again thank you This request is for a conceptual planned unit development on approximately 14
acres of land located at the southeast corner of Highway 5 and Powers Boulevard The Planning Case is
2011 11 I d like to start off by kind of going back in time and talking about when we updated the last
element of the last iteration of the comprehensive plan which is our 2030 plan and kind of get some
historical context to the commercial zoning district in the city of Chanhassen This is also found in the staff
report and all these documents are also online The comprehensive plan the City s zoning ordinance and the
McComb s study which I ll also talk about So for background the retail market study done in 2006 was kind
of a pre cursor to kind of putting in place the City s commercial land use So the City has maintained a long
standing policy of directing commercial development into the central business district Chanhassen
historically maintains an active business community With the construction of 312 the City saw an
opportunity to re examine the commercial opportunities in the downtown core of the city so in partnership
with the Chamber of Commerce they contracted with the McComb s Group to study the retail opportunities
The study found that the city could support an additional potential regional mall and continue to have a
healthy downtown business district So with that I m going to kind of outline some of the elements that the
McComb s study looked at So they examined the existing shopping patterns and potential retail areas in
Chanhassen and they were evaluated determined their suitability for development So that would be vacant
parcels Also some parcels that could be used for redevelopment The shopping areas competitive with
Chanhassen were and commercial areas were also identified and evaluated to determine competitive impacts
on future development Retail development Owners and managers of businesses in Chanhassen were
interviewed to obtain their observations on retail trends competitive pressures where their customers lived
and other information pertinent to the study including opinions about downtown Chanhassen s strengths and
it s weaknesses and ideas for possible impacts of the downtown with the downtown in the new potential 312
commercial area So businesses in the downtown Chanhassen were asked to participate in a survey of their
customers and some of the businesses did participate in that survey to find additional information about why
people shop where they did in the downtown core This information was helped to identify the Chanhassen s
trade area Developers brokers and realtors and interested developers were also interviewed by the
McComb s Group to talk to them about what they saw as future development potentials and that also
included not only retail but some of the industrial parks So from this the estimated future demand for retail
of Chanhassen was compared to kind of the surrounding cities The outcome of that study said that there was
additional potential for downtown commercial development potentially 12 acres and that there was in the 312
4
113
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
interchange at Powers Boulevard and the new 312 that there could be up to 88 to 113 retail acres for
development So with that this is again from the 2006 McComb s Study where they identified the trade area
for the city of Chanhassen So there s kind of concentric rings here The smallest area would be the
convenience trade area and that s where we consider kind of the neighborhood trade area Maybe gas stations
and the like So this area kind of delineates kind of just the core maybe the southern part of Chanhassen
The next ring would be the middle ring would be the downtown This is kind of where people that would
come to the downtown where they would be traveling from So it kind of cuts through Lake Minnetonka As
far west as Waconia Again when this was done there wasn t a Target yet in Waconia so that trade area has
probably changed a little bit and then also as far east as Eden Prairie Then that bigger ring showed potential
if the City was to do a lifestyle center which was documented based on rate of growth household income for
potential regional lifestyle center which had different implications and through the comprehensive plan
process we spent a lot of time talking about differentiating the uses there that would be different than what
would be the daily needs of the downtown commercial area So with that that information then was put into
the comprehensive plan and when we had all the meetings on the commercial districts this was a map that was
put out at all the open houses and the like so what this map created was the distinct districts that we have in
the city The downtown which is the area shown as A The downtown community commercial district B
would be those neighborhood areas for example along 7 and 41 Those convenience areas where you can get
gas and some other convenience commercial The newest one being down on Lyman Boulevard and 101 with
the Kwik Trip And then C would be the community commercial The new district that we ll be talking
about a little bit more in detail tonight and that was to provide additional opportunities to strengthen the
downtown core And then finally the potential for a regional mall at the intersection interchange of 312 and
Powers Boulevard just south of Lyman Again that s shown as the area D And again there was specific
criteria that we put in place for that potential regional mall about that it be different than the downtown core
and that it not be a series of strip or kind of big box retail That kind of we said we wanted to provide
opportunities for those sort of things to happen closer to the core So with that this is the downtown zoning
districts in which we re going to kind of focus on and we re going to zoom into this specific area but this was
prior to the rezoning of the downtown core with the existing districts where we have highway business is
more kind of auto related The neighborhood business district was actually where Park Nicollet and some of
those uses are St Hubert s south of Highway 5 which has some commercial Hotels restaurants and then
the St Hubert s school The PUD where Target Cub is and then the BG Office Max and the like and then the
IOP and the community commercial would be that area shown in green So with that the adoption of the
comprehensive plan we stated that we would move forward and rezone some of the core of the downtown to
actually up zone and allow for greater intensity So the City changed the general business to central business
district because that provides for more intense development of those uses Currently Southwest Transit is
constructing a ramp behind the Dinner Theater That also will allow for additional development in that and
redevelopment in that area which we anticipate So the community commercial district So when we finished
the comprehensive plan we said we will now develop two new zoning districts A potential regional mall and
the community commercial district To be clear this property has dual guiding It can either be office
industrial or it can be community commercial The intent of the community commercial by the zoning
district as stated in the zoning district that we created was to provide for large scale commercial
developments because we were out of space for that in the downtown core That these large scale
commercial or office users you know needed high needed visibility from collector roads And then we also
said that the minimum could be 15 000 square feet and that the largest could be no bigger than 65 000 square
feet so again it was to provide that opportunity for some larger scale users So now I want to take some time
and talk about this specific application and how it relates to what I just presented So the applicant is
requesting a general concept plan for a PUD The site again is currently zoned industrial office park With
the adoption of the 2030 plan in 2008 the City Council guided this property for either community commercial
or for the office industrial but they saw the opportunity for some additional retail The request for a planned
unit concept allows the applicant to seek relief from the standards of the conventional zoning district by
creating a unique district rather than asking for variances of the underlying zoning district So the closest
conventional district to this would be the community commercial So the planned unit development offers
114
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
flexibility to develop a site through relaxation of some of the normal zoning district The use of the PUD
allows for greater variety of uses Construction of phasing a potential lower development costs In exchange
for that flexibility the City has an expectation that the development will result in significant higher quality and
more sensitive proposal that would have been the case Using the other more standard zoning districts So it
is the applicant s responsibility to demonstrate to the City s expectations that they are to be realized against
the criteria of the PUD So the PUD standards itself they still have to meet this PUD request still has to meet
the City s architectural standards It still has to meet the flood plain wetland shoreland districts and as stated
in the staff report they have to be consistent with the comprehensive plan They also have to demonstrate that
they offer the higher quality of architecture as stated and any other design standards cited in that section
including the landscaping parking and the like So again the uniqueness of each PUD will be related against
those 9 criteria So the site itself This is a 14 acre site with an existing building footprint of 140 000 square
feet There actually is a mezzanine on this building so the total square footage on that current site building is
154 700 square feet The original building was occupied by Victory Envelope and the building has been
vacant for a number of years They have leased space in there but it s predominantly vacant With this
proposal the current building would be torn down Again to be clear just to make sure everybody knows
where we are this would be Highway 5 and this would be Powers Boulevard so access would be via Park
Road Again the elevation changes significantly on this parcel so if you re up on Highway 5 at this point it s
about 950 If you drop down about 40 feet down to at the bottom of the creek here about 910 so there s
significant grade change on the site The site itself is adjacent to a creek and a wetlands The wetlands is
classified as a Manage II in our storm water management plan and a Manage II requires a 20 foot buffer and a
30 foot setback from this is required so the concept plan shows a majority of the wetland less than 30 feet So
this is in this area here does not meet the required setback So again it s pinched pretty tight This red is a
retaining wall so the retaining walls in order to meet the topography this is graded significantly so the
retaining walls would be to provide for that And I ll go through that in a minute but so the wetland again is
impacted So the encroachment into the wetland the buffer setback again is caused by the retaining wall and
again the values of the wetland are we believe are impacted by the retaining wall itself into that
encroachment of the wetland In addition there s tree loss which would be further detriment to the wetland
and the volume and quality of water running into this creek So as I stated the grading proposed the finished
floor elevation that s this area here is proposed to be 931 which is approximately 9 feet lower than the
ground elevation on the east side of the building The concept plan includes the retaining walls Up to 21 feet
on the west side and 16 1 2 feet on both the north and the east side So that would be this area shown in red
here Next thing I d like to talk about is the architectural compliance Again even though they re going for
the PUD they do have to meet the City s architectural standards So the city code requires that the
development comply with certain minimum requirements and as stated the design standards which are found
in the city code So for material and design the materials on the building include the EFIS and pre cast
panels Tilt up panels that are grid or grid like in appearance EFIS can be used as an accent material It may
occupy no more than 15 and the concern that we have with the building is that it s significant it does not
provide the significantly higher architectural standards that we would anticipate with a PUD The color of the
building does meet the City s requirements So size portion and placement as part of the architecture review
The entry does have a pronounced is pronounced with a canopy over the front entry There are recesses and
articulation in the building Projections around the windows and the like The highest point of the roof is
about 35 feet The building needs to make sure that their rooftop equipment again this is conceptual review
so there s not all the engineering s on that so it appears that there is a parapet wall that would be screening
From information from the applicant it does appear that they are proposing that and or minimal rooftop
equipment on the top I think I just talked about the height of the building So this is again the continued
front of the building Again I think there s some things that you can do to enhance again to meet the
architectural standards A little bit more articulation on the front Facade transparencies all views from the
public must be 50 windows and doors and there are some perspectives that don t This southern
perspective the one in the bottom excuse me would be a perspective heading east on Highway 5 and in this
area where you ve got the trash enclosure you ve got some areas that it would be viewed that would also have
to have different architectural on them to meet the requirements because they again are viewed by the public
0
115
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
Parking So if you look in this area and go back to the original site plan the parking plan takes advantage of
compact parking stalls of maximum of 25 or 116 stalls The concern that the staff has is that the parking
requirements do allow compact stalls but they really shouldn t be in a place with high turnover and so if
you re in an office building where you don t have as much traffic going in and out So not only deficient in
parking spaces by 12 they maximize the number of small parking stalls which would be a concern when
you have a lot of high turnover in a parking lot The refuse screening does meet code as far as it being in the
rear of the building and appropriately screened So we talked about this another exposure This would be
Highway 5 kind of heading south on Powers where again there s areas that are viewed from the public that
aren t need to be either facade modulation or smaller increments of that instead of the large expanses of the
tilt up s So again this wouldn t comply And then the sign itself does not meet the city code but again this is
conceptual review so those things sometimes change over With that I m going to turn it over to the City
Engineer and let him kind of go through the traffic
Oehme Thanks Ms Aanenson Good evening Commissioner Aller commission members
Aller Good evening
Oehme I d like to touch on the traffic analysis that was completed for the project As part of the application
the developer was required to complete a traffic impact analysis As part of the report on traffic turning
movements and traffic counts were gathered So based on Carver County traffic modeling and the City s
traffic analysis zoning estimates for traffic distributions were also calculated Carver County and MnDOT
have commented on this report and that is included in your packet The City also completed an independent
traffic impact analysis so this first slide here just shows based upon that analysis where the traffic
distributions potential for the site would come from So an example Highway 5 here is shown In this
location 35 of the traffic wanting to potentially go to the site would come off of 5 Make a left turn on
Powers and then come in down through Park Road here So and likewise 5 at east bound Park Road So
using that information also analysis was taken to the next step using the Institute of Transportation
Engineering Trip Generations Peak trip generations were calculated This is a typical analysis that s done
for these type of developments and put in all developments Here s the potential traffic distributions E here
shown for the site and during the p m peak hours so for example 142 trips would potentially make that right
hand turn off of Powers Boulevard into Park Road So this slide shows the total estimated traffic volumes for
the peak p m hours Again we traffic analysis you try you look at the peak impact time periods for these
type of developments and analyze your traffic on those type of situations Also included in these in this
analysis was the pass by traffic That s the traffic that potentially is going down 5 Sees a sign for this
particular location Stops in You know buys product at this potential at this site and then would move on so
about 28 we re estimating would of traffic would potentially be this pass by traffic So this these numbers
show what the p m peak traffic would be for 2013 potentially when this site development would be open and
then also we projected out into the 2030 timeframe too The 2030 volumes also include for potential parcels
that could be developed or redeveloped in the commercial community district in this area and the and also
include the potential regional lifestyle center that is just south of Lyman That potential traffic was included
in the 2030 analysis as well The total anticipated trips for the site for this development is could be as high
as 560 trips in the hour of the p m peak so 500 trips That includes the traffic entering the site and then also
the trips exiting the site Just briefly talk about access to the site This slide shows the existing access to the
site which is the aerial photo here There s the west access as it s shown and the east access is shown here
The proposed curb line is shown here in yellow Here s the new parking area The drive aisles here and the
shifting of the easterly access point This access point is proposed to be a right in right out Based upon the
traffic analysis the amount of volume of traffic that potentially come in and exit this location if it would be
left here without a right in right out would create detrimental impacts to the intersection of Park Road and
Powers Right hand turn lane is also proposed at this location The access is the east access is planned to be
shifted to the west as much as possible to create more turn lane at this location This shift however is not
enough or not recommended enough Staff would prefer that that access be shifted over farther to gain more
7
116
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
stacking in this turn lane and decrease some conflicts at that location Again a raised median is proposed at
in the center of Park Road to prohibit traffic exiting at this location from making a left hand turn onto Park
Road and onto Powers Boulevard So with that this slide shows potential conflicts and traffic issues that staff
has identified Just touch briefly on some of the proposed turn lane taper at this location Powers Boulevard
immediately after the turn off of Powers Drive would have to make a decision whether or not to turn at this
location The access we feel is just so close to the intersection of Powers that there might be some conflicts
there Some hesitation in terms of getting onto the access point Turning radiuses are too short at these
locations Potential U turn impacts at this location Really there s 1 1 2 access points for this site which is
significantly less than we see for these type of developments For example the Walmart that s being built in
Brooklyn Center right now I think they have 5 access points And these type of facilities you like to separate
the delivery vehicles from the patrons wanting to use the facility Walmart Unfortunately there s only two
access points here The delivery vehicles would have to access the west access point here Drive through the
parking lot in back of the facility Make the deliveries and then also and then exit through the parking lot
through the east access point here This development is potentially a 24 hour facility so there would have
there would be potentially some conflicts with those delivery vehicles on occasions The queuing or the back
up at the west access is also a concern for us in the traffic analysis There s potentially at those peak p m
peak times a back up of about 150 feet into the parking lot that would impact some of the parking stalls at this
location here so there d be some conflicts of people trying to get out of the facility and people trying to back
out of the back out of their stalls With that if the proposed development moves forward there also are some
recommendations that staff would like to recommend in terms of additional infrastructure that would be
needed at Powers and Trunk Highway 5 Based upon the analysis again additional left turn for westbound
Highway 5 to southbound 5 would be required That was one of MnDOT s major comments in their report to
staff Staff is also would like to see additional left turn lane on northbound 5 to westbound 5 Or northbound
Powers to westbound 5 there and then also the stacking lane increased as much as we can there There s some
conflicts about backing up on Highway 5 On Powers at the p m peak period where potentially traffic could
not get onto the turn lanes going westbound on 5 A traffic signal would be required at Park Road and Powers
Boulevard for level of service issues and also pedestrian movements That would be a requirement as well
So with that in summary the size of the development poses traffic challenges to our roadway systems here in
this area Staff is also concerned about some of the internal traffic movements within the site based upon our
analysis With that I ll turn it back to you Kate
Aanenson Alright So finally again in the staff report are the 9 findings for a PUD I m going to go through
each of those Again if anybody has a copy of the staff report but I ll summarize those Again I just want to
remind the Planning Commission that this is a concept PUD so because it s concept we don t have everything
detailed and often one of the choices is to ask for additional information to move it forward or decide that it s
too deficient to make it work so deficiencies as laid certainly is the management and design techniques to
reduce potential traffic conflicts as the City Engineer has pointed out Again the staff s opinion is that does
not provide additional preservation of desirable site characteristics We talked about the wetland and the
creek Then also the plan and the design of the building does not meet the standards That would also include
the parking and the sensitive to transitional areas and also we didn t spend a lot of time but the internal
pedestrian access is poor We talked about the signal to get over there to the site off of Park Road and coming
the other way on Park Road but once you get into that there is an internal sidewalk Maybe we can just zoom
in So internally there s a sidewalk in the middle going up to the front door but there s a sidewalk along the
perimeter but it s closer to the car overhang and I think it s a little bit problematic to make it more pedestrian
friendly to walk to the site so those again are some of the concerns that we have on the site itself so I think
this kind of gives you a better understanding of the surrounding situation of the environmental sensitivity So
with that there s two motions that the Planning Commission has You can approve the concept development
if they somewhat you hear from the public hearing and gives the applicant some direction to go Again it s
concept which means just for everyone they would still have to come back They d have to go to City
Council first to get approval from the City Council This is only a recommendation and then if the City
Council gave them a recommendation to proceed with some specific they would have to come back with a
117
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
more detailed plan and have another public hearing so it would be that d be one choice or the Planning
Commission could recommend denial of the concept based on the Findings of Fact as stated in the staff report
so with that Chairman I d be happy to answer any questions that you may have
Aller Thank you Just real quick Mr Oehme on that parking scenario If we were to move the lane farther
west as the planning department and your office would indicate or desire wouldn t that cause additional
problems as well Wouldn t that remove parking spaces
Oehme Potentially the parking stalls could be if I understand your question can be moved over to the east
side of the parking The conflict then occurs if we move the easterly access point farther to the west There s
conflicts between those two access points then and then the westerly access point the stacking of the turn lane
there too is shrunk so there s some other issues associated with moving those two access points closer
together
Aller So it would actually create additional shortages and problems
Oehme There could be yep
Aller Okay And then the traffic turn lanes and modifications that would be required and recommended by
MnDOT were they expected to be in place or implemented at some time in the future according to the 2030
plan
Oehme They did not really specify time periods but I mean their recommendation would be to put the turn
lanes in and it will be the City s expectation that those improvements be made prior to any development of
this size going in at this location
Aller Okay Mr Ellsworth you have any questions
Ellsworth Yes thank you Mr Chair I have quite a few actually and I apologize for my voice today I m
recovering from a cold but I ll try to speak into the microphone Kate you mentioned the two zoning the
IOP and the commercial community commercial In the summary it talks about the City Council guided the
property for either Is that the same as saying that both apply
Aanenson Yes both apply That s correct
Ellsworth Okay that s what I thought but
Aanenson So your determination could be the IOP is still legitimate and no reason to change it
Ellsworth Alright And then you talk about next steps if it was approved That was one of my questions
When you talk about the 9 criteria in the proposal summary those are really the 9 on page 5 and 6 even
though they re not labeled that Required general standards
Aanenson Sorry Chairman Actually the findings would be starting on page 16 so what you re what they re
requesting is the PUD so the findings start on page 16
Ellsworth The findings do but the I guess I was looking at the criteria Evaluated against the 9 criteria
Those are what started
Aanenson Those are the 9 criteria starting on page 16
0
118
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
Ellsworth Okay
Aanenson So it is the is the preservation of desirable features Is it more efficient use of the land Those
would be the findings
Ellsworth Okay thank you And then if the improvements that we talked about just now were to be made
and would have to be made prior to development going in I presume there s no cost share with the City
That s all born by the developer or is there a cost share typically with that
Oehme There s nothing in our capital improvement plan associated with this development
Ellsworth Yeah So there s nothing in the plan so therefore the City would not be putting any money into
any kind of road improvements should a development like this go in is that a fair statement
Oehme There s nothing in our plan for any of these improvements
Ellsworth Okay but capital plans can be changed
Oehme They can and it s up to the council
Ellsworth Okay
Oehme I should be more clear It s up to the council if they want to change our plan they obviously have
the authority to do that but right now we have nothing planned to help offset the infrastructure costs
associated with any improvements in this area Park Road Powers or 5
Ellsworth Understood Thank you And a typical development or improvement like this would the City or
has the City in the past shared in those costs
Oehme I m trying to think I m not aware of any Not since I ve been here I don t think in the last 7 years
Ellsworth Okay thank you That was one of the questions I had We didn t talk much about water today
and I noticed Terry wasn t here so I won t be try to dig too deep but on page 15 we talk about the stated goal
of the it s to improve one waters to existing to improve the existing water quality trend A couple questions
in that How is the water handled today at that site There s a couple not culverts but outlets down at the
bottom of the hill I presume it flows over to the Lake Susan holding pond and those areas that we talked
about I don t know a couple meetings ago The current water handling now Storm water
Oehme Yeah I believe it goes to the pond up on the northwest
Ellsworth Oh the ponds adjacent to the site
Oehme Adjacent to the site correct Right there
Ellsworth Alright And then when you talk about increasing the quality the water must be treated to greater
than NURP standards and I forgot what NURP stands for NURP It must assure that rates to and within
Riley Creek do not increase Can you talk a little bit about how they would do that or you know you got some
mention about the challenges in there that would be a private management system underneath the parking lot
That s all very confusing
10
119
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
Oehme They have not really proposed any storm water improvements at this time We don t really know
exactly what they re thinking We re anticipating that when they do underground storage underneath the
parking lot there s some cisterns or chambers grid chambers Storm water management systems that other
developments like this have put in the past For example the Cub Foods up in Shorewood has these type of
facilities These systems and they re more maintenance More cost to put in but and if you have a limited
site stormwater NURP standards those are the only systems that you really can put in to treat the water so
especially with the amount of impervious surface that s being proposed tonight
Ellsworth Yeah And in any development that would go in here any big building like that would be under
the same constrictions and same restrictions correct
Oehme Correct
Ellsworth Okay And then we talk about the significant obstacles may preclude the development of this site
as indicated in the conceptual plan And again that this site is zoned for I think the maximum was 65 000
dollars into the or 65 000 square feet under the commercial and again I forgot what that s called
Commercial community commercial and that seems that would be more fitting for that size because of the
issues that we re running into with larger buildings and so any site
Aanenson What it says is it says on one floor
Ellsworth On one floor
Aanenson On one floor so if you went two stories that would free up parking space too so the intent was that
you could go more vertical then it would give you the exposure on Highway 5
Ellsworth Okay
Aanenson I don t think we talked about it but because of the elevation change I think this might be a good
one to show you The building is sitting down We talked about the change in grade so it s actually recessed
quite a bit so you re just seeing the top of the profile because of the retaining walls as you would be driving
by so one of the things we talked about in the commercial study is somebody on that site might want the
visibility A user would want that traffic that you can see the use coming
Ellsworth Alright That s all the questions I had for staff at this time Mr Chair thank you Thank you Paul
Aller Thank you Commissioner Doll
Doll I m just wondering what your opinion is regarding getting a semi through this parking lot To me
looking at this it just I don t even know how you make a turn It appears that there s a hard concrete or a
hard bituminous on the outside perimeter and that I don t know how it makes that first left turn and squiggles
back there and then it comes down to the south and then if a car s turning into the right and a semi s coming
out you have potential for back up I mean does this work
Oehme I mean we have the same concern as you do
Doll Okay
Oehme They re I mean they showed the again the traffic circulation for delivery trucks again going through
the west access point up and around Staff did put turning movement templates for larger truck traffic 18
11
120
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
wheeler truck traffic and these radiuses do meet minimum standards but again it s the conflicts with parked
vehicles Those type of things that are our concern You know it s very tight
Doll Okay And what is the kind of the process of Walmart or a big box coming in and looking at a site like
this and you know knowing that they re going to have to adjust It doesn t seem like they kind of took the site
into consideration before this I m confused about the size of this thing and where it s sitting
Aanenson Yeah I guess I d ask have you ask the applicant that
Doll Okay I have no further questions
Aller Commissioner Thomas
Thomas Actually I ll have questions for the applicant so I ll just wait
Aller Commissioner Tennyson
Tennyson One question Could you explain a little bit about the difference between what you called regular
commercial in the report and community commercial I think I ve been a little stuck on that
Aanenson Sure There s actually the City has a couple different zoning districts for commercial Maybe I
can go back to sorry So there s right now the City has this is in the comprehensive plan so we have the
central business district which is the core of the downtown We also have along some fringes of the core we
have business highway which is kind of the auto related part Then we also have neighborhood commercial
and again these are zoning districts and that s kind of where you meet your daily needs which would be also
kind of more convenience your gas stations and some other support things There s offices in some of those
too And then the community commercial was to compliment again the downtown and looking at the studies
and saying there s not much room downtown We re kind of looking at the redevelopment to strengthen the
downtown Again looking at if something was to large was to go When I say large I mean talking about a
lifestyle center and it was clear during that process that we would have been in piecemeal a lot of
development There was going to be one large master plan that we provide additional commercial which was
created a new zoning district The community commercial zoning district And then the lifestyle center
which was specific zoning districts
Tennyson So the application here would vary basically the type of commercial
Aanenson Correct Why they re asking for a PUD the closest district would be a CC but the PUD allows
you that flexibility to create the district That s why you have to meet those 9 criteria Are you giving a more
sensitive development Higher architecture Those sort of things so you can get ask for really for those types
of and we have a number of commercial PUD s in the city
Tennyson Okay thank you
Aller Ms Hokkanen
Hokkanen Yes I have one or two questions about traffic I was surprised when I read the report the study
about most of the traffic coming from the east to the west and was there morning traffic Any numbers on
morning traffic for the traffic going from the west to the east which is heavier in the morning with the traffic
from the east to the west with a Walmart in Eden Prairie are they expecting people coming home from the
west to stop on their way home from work or any numbers on that
12
121
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
Oehme When we looked at the traffic analysis it just the numbers just appeared that the p m peak hours are
the most will be the heaviest used Typically these type of facilities when people are coming home after
work they want to stop in Get supplies and go again so that s the type of usage that we re anticipating in the
afternoon to be the most so
Hokkanen In this letter from the Minnesota Department of Transportation they were saying how critical this
morning peak period is and there s no really information on that but they re concerned about that
Oehme Yeah and I mean they re concerned about it too but I think the p m peak numbers that we ve looked
at it kind of trumps the a m
Hokkanen It does okay Otherwise my other questions have been answered
Aller Commissioner Undestad
Undestad Nothing right now
Aller Okay Thank you very much At this point in time we ll ask the developer applicant if they want to
come forward Make a presentation Please state your name and your representation for the record please
Lisa B Nelson Thank you Mr Chairman and Planning Commission members My name is Lisa B Nelson
I live at 205 North Lincoln in Thorpe Wisconsin Just over the river but I was born in Duluth So we re
excited to be here tonight to talk about this proposal and I m also here with our entire Walmart team here in
the back The people standing back here All from Minnesota and they all live in the area so we re all very
familiar with Chanhassen and the unique amenities that you have here in Chanhassen The high quality of life
that you enjoy We also have a divisional office in Bloomington and that s really important We have kind of
decentralized our company a little bit so where a lot of the functions that used to be in Bentonville Arkansas
they re not located right here in Bloomington for this division and I m happy to have with us tonight Sharon
Power who s the regional manager for 97 stores and she lives right next door in Eden Prairie So Sharon s
here tonight because she s going to shop this store if it s built so And then Luke and Will and Will are
engineers Will Matzek is going to speak right after I do and I m going to give you just a little bit of
background about Walmart just because we re not here and today I spent the day talking with neighbors
talking with folks around the community just around the intersection mainly at the Perkins and the Taco Bell
and just trying to get a sense for what people thought was important and you know there seems to be some
gap in knowledge about our company Just a little bit so I just want to take if I might just a little bit Give
you a little bit of history In the 1970 s a lot of the retailing community started to go towards these larger
discount retailing stores so you started to see Targets and K Marts and Walmart and in fact you know here in
Minnesota is home to a lot of great retailers Sam Walton believed that everyone should have access to low
prices Not just folks who lived in the city but people who lived in rural areas and that really was the start of
his business That s how he built his business by serving customers and letting people know that everyone
should have access to low prices so they don t have to leave their community to do that Here in Chanhassen
we know people are shopping our stores because we analyze leakage information Leakage about 70 of our
transactions are done through a check or a credit card We have a 5 digit zip code so we kind of look to see
where people are coming from and shopping at various stores in the area and we know a lot of folks in this
area are shopping at Chaska and Shakopee and Eden Prairie and what we re proposing is that we keep those
dollars right here in Chanhassen As you know Walmart is one of the most successful companies in the
world We re quite large In Minnesota we have 75 facilities across the state We re one of the state s largest
private employers We also have about 1 040 some suppliers in this state which is a very very large number
of suppliers here that account for 13 4 billion dollars of merchandise and services and impact on the
Minnesota economy so that s huge right Let me talk a little bit about our proposal here This store is
120 000 square feet and will provide 250 to 300 jobs We all know in this economy it s very very difficult
13
122
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
for many folks who have lost their jobs or who are looking for jobs There ll be a lot of discussion around
jobs What kind of jobs these are What do they pay What kind of benefits are there I expect there to be a
lot of discussion about that and we are happy to answer any of those questions Sharon oversees all of the
stores again in this area so those store managers in Eden Prairie etc they all funnel up to Sharon Our average
hourly wage in Minnesota for full time hourly associates is 12 15 an hour We do offer full time and part
time associates benefits Health care benefits and we do have a match for our 401K up to 6 This store
again 250 to 300 jobs right here in Chanhassen And many times when we have a store that opens in a
community and we are advertising for 300 positions let s say we have 4 000 to 5 000 applicants so there are a
lot of folks who are looking for these jobs and who want these jobs We re going to talk about traffic Willis
going to Will and his team are going to talk about traffic and I m going to just say that in terms of traffic our
team will work with the City and they have been working with the City to address a lot of the concerns that
you re going to hear tonight or that have already been identified by your city staff so we are able to mitigate
many of those traffic concerns Another question we often get when we re working on sitings is regarding
crime Usually the crime statistics of our store will mirror the crime statistics of your community and based
on your website you have very low crime in Chanhassen so we would expect that at the store But you should
know and we can give you some references in this regard is that we do work with our local communities in a
very very integrated way with local police departments to make sure that we re cooperating fully in any
issues or problems that there may be at the store We have digital cameras on our property We digitally
record just about everything that takes place on our property and we cooperate fully with local law
enforcement so usually if a crime is committed on our property we re very successful at closing those cases
We re here to answer your questions tonight and we re happy to answer any of them Many of them that
you ve already asked we have people itching to answer the question but more importantly we re here to listen
We want the project to be successful for your community and you know the engineers can talk about the
technicalities of water Managing water Managing traffic The architecture and those technicalities we will
meet your code We will do what you need us to do and we ll go beyond that when we hear from your
neighbors and from your constituents so we re here to listen tonight too and hopefully we can gather some
really good information from neighbors about how we can make this a project that works for everyone
We re very very excited to come to Chanhassen It s a very very exciting project We look forward to
working with you so I know I was speaking really fast but I know there s a lot of people that want to speak so
I m going to turn it over to Will
Aller Thank you Thank you for that overview Will
Will Matzek Yes
Aller What s your last name sir
Will Matzek Matzek
Aller Mr Matzek And what is your capacity with Walmart
Will Matzek Sir I am the engineer of record for the project and have been working with staff so far as well
as the as well as MnDOT and Carver County
Aller Thank you If you could we ve heard a good general overview of Walmart and I think a lot of the
individuals here are very proud of their community and have participated in the past in the creation of our
plan Our 2030 plan where this community wants to be and what kind of development it wants to have and
we ve set the development pattern and the zonings for a reason and that was with their input and the input of a
lot of engineers and individuals and a lot of discussion so I would like you to address if you could the findings
in the report and the concerns that our planning division has come up with because that s where I think we
need to focus the conversation tonight
14
123
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
Will Matzek Certainly I appreciate that and thank you for the opportunity to speak We re here really to
you know get input from the commission and the community We are very very early on in this process and
really that is why we are here and wanting to get the input as this is certainly an opportunity that Walmart
wants to be a part of this community and we all on the team certainly take that very seriously and just
appreciate that chance and we d like to take the input tonight and then certainly I think there s some updates
that we can do from both an engineering standpoint as well as an architectural standpoint that we can do to
mitigate some of the concerns from staff as well as the input we receive tonight so certainly I can touch on a
number of the concerns and if there s specific questions feel free to ask From a traffic standpoint I know
there was quite a bit of discussion about that We have certainly been working with staff as well as MnDOT
and Carver County initially on a traffic study and but yet we re still very early on in the process Generally
we have concurrence as far as the various improvements that may be necessary here for not only the Walmart
store but also looking out into the future for future development in this area to account for that traffic
Actually all the way out to 2030 so we re looking beyond just this one particular store We looked at the area
as a whole in the analysis with traffic and as I had mentioned we generally have concurrence on the
improvements that would be required and we ll certainly be working with the various not only the City but
also the County and MnDOT on the best way to implement the improvements to account for the new traffic
generation from the store but also into the future so we have a broader vision and so we re matching up with
the comprehensive plan From an internal traffic standpoint with truck traffic I know that was a question
We have performed an analysis using a program called auto turn which is a very widely used program that
utilizes truck modeling software essentially to look at the footprint of the trucks that would be serving this
site The trucks that will be serving the site can certainly safely mitigate through the site and the trucks are
really the life blood of any store We need to get our merchandise to the store and so that is certainly one of
our chief concerns as well as customer traffic and ensuring that there is an adequate truck path that works for
both the trucks as well as customers and so we can certainly provide that information here in the future That
is as mentioned we re very early on and so we can provide that input as we proceed and then from an access
management standpoint with the two access locations we have modeled that within our traffic modeling
software We ve worked with as I mentioned the City County and DOT and the access points as we have
them proposed actually do function very well They operate at a very good level of service I do know there
was some concern as far as the location and how close the easterly most access was to Powers We think we
can work with staff to find an acceptable solution to that to move that over a little bit such that it will comply
with the ordinances and we think we can come up with a very suitable solution to that issue as we proceed
We can also work with staff and with the input here tonight to improve some of the site layouts and making
sure that we will work with staff to improve the buffer area adjacent to the wetland With the proposed
retaining walls on site we are staying out of the wetland entirely which is certainly positive We re very
sensitive to the natural resources but we ll take the input from staff and see if we can t improve upon that
buffer to meet and or exceed the ordinances From a water quality standpoint we will currently the site does
discharge into that wetland area and so we will be looking to add underground treatment facilities that will
improve the water quality and improve the discharge rate leaving the site so but with the proposed
development there will be an improvement from a natural resources standpoint from water quality so certainly
a very positive thing from that front I believe I ve touched on a number of the items that you had outlined
but if there is anything in particular in question I d be happy to answer those
Aller I guess have you done your own independent traffic study then Is that the model that you re talking
about
Will Matzek Yes sir we have so in working with both the City and County and MnDOT we did perform a
traffic study and generally the conclusions they didn t teach me this in engineering school sorry But
generally you know we concur and so now it s a matter of working through the details of how you implement
these types of solutions and the real design of it You know in concept we all believe we re on the same page
but we need to take it a step further as we proceed
15
124
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
Aller When you say you re on the same page you agree with MnDOT and the engineering department that
these extra turn lanes are needed and the requirement for the for instance the stacking lane to move farther
west
Will Matzek Yeah we generally like I said have concurrence on these things Now we need to actually get
into the real design We wanted to get the input from commission as well as the community here before we
proceed too far That was what you know we want the opportunity to make sure that we re hearing concerns
and that we can address everybody as best we can
Aller Yeah and I ll go ahead and ask Commissioner Ellsworth s next question which is is it your intention
to pay for the interchanges or to request funds from the City
Will Matzek Our intention is to mitigate concerns as best we can and we ll work through that as we proceed
You know the real design has not been done yet so we d like the opportunity to work with staff on the real
design as well as the County and MnDOT to ensure that we have a good design that works and work through
those responsibilities but normally you know we re very early on so we want to cooperate with all the
agencies to ensure we re meeting concerns there
Undestad One question Just a quick question
Aller Commissioner Undestad
Undestad What s the hard surface coverage on the way you have this laid out right here
Will Matzek I believe it s approximately 9 acres
Undestad No but the total percentage of hard surface versus the normal
Will Matzek Versus the site I believe
Aanenson It does meet the requirement It s 70 and you do meet that
Will Matzek I believe that s correct yes
Aller Any other questions at this time Commissioner Ellsworth
Ellsworth Thank you Mr Chair Will Mr Matzek I guess I just have the basic question if Walmart s
coming in you know I d bring my very best for this It seems like there s so many deficiencies in this plan
and so many things pointed out by staff and I m uncomfortable with you standing there saying well you
know we re going to work with staff and we ll work some of this stuff out and so and it s like well well why
didn t you do that and then come to us and then we d be in a lot different position and the audience might be
in a lot different position as well but now there s all kinds of these unknowns at least in my opinion
Unknowns about where this might go and how this might turn out and when we talk about you know moving
the wall or making this different or getting further away for a larger buffer and so on all that tells me is that
the area s going to shrink and is that something Walmart is willing to do to actually shrink this store to meet
some of those requirements that you talked about meeting
Will Matzek As far as you know we mentioned we are early on but you know we have met with staff and
with the staff report this was the first formal comments that we had received As with any ordinances there
can be different interpretations on how you read it and you know our intent is to meet the ordinances Staff
16
125
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
has outlined a number of concerns and we re open to working with staff We very much are We want to be
part of the community and mentioned this is you know a conceptual PUD so we are early on and I think that
is it was my understanding of the intent of the meeting and so certainly there are ways to improve and we re
open to that and so I know that s not necessarily the answer you want to hear but we re open to hearing this
feedback and dialogue and making some modifications and presenting it again if that s something that you
would like to see We re here to work with the community really
Aller Okay And just very respectfully I think to Commissioner Ellsworth s point is very well taken What
you re asking for is not to meet conditions but actually to go around certain zoning conditions by requesting a
PUD which is why I was asking about the 2030 plan In our 2030 plan this type of arrangement as outlined in
your concept is not acceptable so the question is why should we allow you to modify or ask us to modify our
zoning requirements to allow Walmart to come in and build Develop
Will Matzek Sure Okay well I think that from a number of standpoints we are in line with the
comprehensive plan as far as the services that this store would provide and I think that a number of those
items really truly are met and the intent is met I think by the comprehensive plan I think maybe the bigger
issue that I m hearing is maybe the size of the store I will say that this is actually one of the smaller
footprints that Walmart does do I think a lot of folks are used to you know a 200 000 square foot type
building Walmart has you know reduced that size for this type of a site and that it is smaller and really I
think as well I think the retail environment is a little bit different now than maybe perhaps when the
comprehensive plan was set You know the square footage I know there s a limit on that and I recognize that
we do exceed that but at the same time I think that you know with the cooperation between the Walmart team
and certainly staff that we can find suitable ways to solve these issues to make it a worthwhile development at
this location
Aller Okay thank you Anything else
Ellsworth No thank you
Aller Commissioner Doll
Ellsworth Thank you Mr Matzek
Will Matzek Thank you
Doll I m just wondering
Will Matzek Oh I m sorry I should say too that Jackie Cook Haxby our architect is also here too to speak
and to answer any questions as well before we move on
Doll Why this site Why doesn t Walmart
Will Matzek I think that Mr Mike Sims with MidAmerica Real Estate will be a person that can answer this
particular question
Doll Okay I just want to be on record that you re kind of putting us in a hard position here for what we re
being asked to determine here with what we got on paper here It doesn t meet the requirements that were
asked I just don t understand it It seems kind of a like a waste of time
Mike Sims Maybe that ll just rest on there I won t touch it I good evening I m Mike Sims I m with
MidAmerican Real Estate I m the broker for Walmart here in Minnesota
17
126
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
Aller Thank you Mr Sims
Mike Sims As it relates to your question specifically why this site we would tell you that in this corridor on
the north side of 5 there are not parcels that can accommodate a box of this size so from a pure looking in the
Chanhassen trade area this is the best site for our intended use I looked at this site 5 years ago for Lowe s I
also do the Lowe s work At that time for 150 000 foot store and any retailer that s looking to locate in
Chanhassen would tell you that this is you know the best site available for retail If I can answer any other
questions as it relates to the retail aspect Thank you
Aller Thank you Mr Sims Any other questions Another representative
Lisa B Nelson I think that will conclude our presentation for right now unless you have other questions of
us We do have the architect here We do have our traffic engineer and Will and I can ask any questions
about the company I can answer them You know I know you re going to get a lot of feedback from the
public but we are here There is one site that you can go to www walmartfacts com It is audited and it has
all of our corporate facts on that website It will have all the information from Minnesota as well so you can
refer to that The one thing that you will miss without Jackie coming up here to do any kind of architectural
presentation is our commitment to sustainability This store will be absolutely sustainable in terms of the
design elements that go into the actual store You ll see the daylight harvesting which is taking in the natural
light and having light fixtures that adjust etc There ll be a lot of elements in this store that you ll be really
proud of as a community so just wanted to there s a lot there to talk about if you re interested
Aller Well I just want to make it clear that it wouldn t be on us to miss her presentation We d like to hear
anything that you have to say that will educate our community on why Walmart is wanting to come into
Chanhassen and what they would do for our community
Lisa B Nelson And as Will stated we looked at this meeting really as very preliminary where we re looking
at a concept here and there s still a lot of room for us to make changes to this plan We had a meeting before
this and Will was outlining some of the very changes that the City Engineer recommended so there s and as
we hear you know like I said there s a lot of technical things We can meet any of your codes We can meet
your what you need us to do technically but hearing from neighbors and hearing the antidotal how traffic
really moves How people really are going to drive through there How people want to shop What they
want to experience Those are things we want to hear too so it s a two way conversation We don t want to
just come in here and say this is our plan and it s this or nothing We re coming in and saying we want to
have a two way conversation with you and we are very flexible A lot of the we have a lot of flexibility at
Walmart and we definitely want to be a good company to work with
Aller Understanding that is there anybody else from Walmart you d like to have come up and speak Thank
you
Lisa B Nelson Jackie want to talk about your
Jackie Cook Haxby I try to avoid the microphone whenever possible I m Jackie Cook Haxby I m with
SAIC and I actually live right around the corner on Green Ridge Drive Also in Eden Prairie but this is my
shopping area so I shop all the stores that are in this area The architecture I think maybe
Aanenson Is this okay
Jackie Cook Haxby One of the side shots with the back shots maybe Yeah that ll work We did indeed
read your ordinance and one of the reasons that we did not put or I did not direct my staff to put any windows
18
127
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
on the sides and the back in this bottom elevation is that number one it s significantly below grade Number
two those are all warehouse functions or cooler freezer functions As a matter of fact the pop out on the
bottom right hand corner that you can see that has a little lighter brick inbetween some columns actually is the
compressor unit for the refrigeration and we tried to locate those more towards the areas that are not going to
be occupied by anyone else So in reading your code I noticed that there was a comment in there that when
the functions of the building don t allow transparency or windows entrances doors that type of thing there
were a possibility of some other exceptions including architectural features It being more or less hidden by
the shrubbery that s going to be or landscaping that s going to be right on Highway 5 I debated putting
anything on that side It s not that I can t It s not that I won t I just didn t notice that it would in viewing it
and driving it I didn t think it was going to be viewable so that s why it s not there Talking a little bit about
the materials of the building Being from this area of course I have surveyed the areas I do note that Target
is painted block It also has some non transparent windows on it It has a single entrance Some of the newer
buildings like the Office Max I think it is and a few of the others do have more of a brick type atmosphere
and we ve tried to use a little bit of all the materials We are indicating that the primary main wall
construction is going to be a pre cast and it is a textured pre colored pre cast product We have included
additional windows Some of them non transparent on the front We have used some quick brick which is a
larger brick element and made out of concrete but fired like brick to provide accents around the building
We ve also included a second wall sign on the back to add a little more interest to the back side of the
building Again realizing that most of it is not going to be visible because you re going to be zooming by
there I know I do at about 60 miles an hour if the stop light s green and the trees are up so As to the
sustainability of the building at least to briefly address that One thing that we re doing is one of the most
sustainable features according to the education is re using a site that has already been vacant for some time
Yes we re taking down the existing building The existing building was not something that we could convert
to a retail store so we have to take it down but we are re using a site that is already developed Therefore
we re not going out and taking a green field site We re not destroying somebody s crop land We re not
taking part of the Arboretum We re staying in a site that s already developed We have the white roof which
is reflective and will create less of a heat island effect We have the sky lights and there are a lot of them
There s probably um maybe 100 or better sky lights on top of this building that will be tied in to the lights
inside the building with a sensor and so when it s bright daylight out the lights inside the building go way
down When it s evening or an overcast day the lights come up The heat off the refrigeration units is
recycled so that it goes into heating all the water We have of course all the low BOC refrigerants and that
type of thing The low water usage toilets and sinks Any number of things We use fly ash in the concrete
These are all features that are fairly standard and again at walmartfacts com you can see a light of our
sustainable things The other thing we do is we are very heavy into the recycling Not only during the while
the store is in use but when we re building it so we try very hard not to take anything to the dump We have a
recycling program during construction and that material is all recycled that comes off the building that we
don t use to build it Also during while the store is in operation we use two types of recycling We have the
cardboard and paper recycling which is bound up and it is picked up and then we also have now gone to with
the stores that have grocery in it we have the recycling of all the green goods and that type of thing that can t
be sold or are spoiled and so those are recycled also Any questions
Aller Commissioners Okay thank you Appreciate your time
Lisa B Nelson The one thing that we did not mention is our community involvement and I just want to
mention that because it s significant in Minnesota In the communities that we call home our stores are
stores of the community They give back to local organizations You could call any of our stores to find out
and Sharon could provide to us if you were interested in that information what kinds of organizations in the
communities that where we have stores where we are investing our dollars Our charitable dollars In
Minnesota last year we gave 14 5 million dollars back to the communities that we call home and we do that
mainly to local organizations community based organizations Little League teams PTO s fire departments
police departments any kind of civic type of organization that we could support that would make our
19
128
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
connection with the community more real We re very very interested in that And when Jackie was talking
about the things that we recycle out of our stores we have a very very comprehensive sustainability a very
proactive sustainability plan inside our stores We have some very very hefty sustainability goals at Walmart
that we re going to meet to create zero waste to be 100 supplied by renewable energy and lastly to help sell
sustainable products to all of our customers so you know for example last year we had a goal to sell 100
million CFL s to our customers and we thought well could we do this in one year Could we sell 100 million
compact fluorescent light bulbs and we did We did it by October 1S We made some key changes in the area
of laundry detergent working with our suppliers Telling them we don t want it watered down anymore We
want it concentrated It costs less fuel Takes up less space It s easier for folks to carry And now that
change has gone across the sector Across the retail sector It s difficult to find watered down laundry
detergent because we asked our suppliers to work with us on becoming more sustainable So I think having a
Walmart in your community will do a lot of things It will add tax value It will add to your it will help you
create some values so that you can afford to do the things that your community wants to do I think it will
bring that low price leadership that your neighbors need and want They re already shopping at a Walmart
somewhere in this area I think the job creation is significant 250 to 300 jobs is very very significant and I
think the community investment that we will make as a company and what we will do to give back to
Chanhassen will be amazing and you will be impressed by it so we re here to answer questions but we re here
to listen too so I m going to stop talking Thank you very much
Aller Thank you Thank you for your presentation Okay at this point in time I m going to if we re going
to have side conversations please take them out in the hall At this point in time we re going to open up the
hearing for public hearing which means public comment Please take turns Come up to the podium We re
going to try to limit the statements to 3 minutes and hopefully we won t be repeating comments If you agree
with someone and they ve said it all then maybe it s better that we just go ahead and continue but I do not
want that to be taken as an intent to stop you from coming forward and giving any information or comment on
this matter that you feel that you would like to so with that I m going to open the public hearing
Scott Hippen May I step forward
Aller Please
Scott Hippen My name is Scott Hippen 7017 Cheyenne Trail I am against Walmart moving into 1000 Park
Road I m also the person who clapped when the representatives of Walmart concluded their reactions
because I believe that they deserve our respect I appreciate their interest in our community Mr Chairman
members of the Planning Commission City Engineer Madam Director of Community Development and
representatives of Walmart The first page of the report last sentence says a PUD planned unit development
must be consistent with the City s comprehensive plan and I believe that is taken from the Chanhassen City
Code and when you read the Chanhassen City Code you will see that primary goal of the code of a
comprehensive plan The primary goal of the Chanhassen comprehensive plan is to contain growth of
Chanhassen with the support of Chanhassen residents Residents of Chanhassen do we have support for this
motion to move Walmart into 1000 Park Road I believe we don t Thank you It is according to the
Municipal Land Development Act of Minnesota that requires municipalities to use it s comprehensive plan as
a guideline so I ask that the commissioners take that into consideration and I will point out page I believe 19
Sorry page 17 of the report On number 5 asks is the development consistent with the comprehensive plan
and I would say that it is not because you do not have the support of Chanhassen residents and that we have
the power the commission and the residents of Chanhassen to control the growth of our community and I
would ask that the board I m sorry The commission make a recommendation to City Council to put a
moratorium on big box store development in Chanhassen until we have a chance to vet out what part of our
community we would like to have a big box store in so that we can be in control So that we re no longer
wasting our time with these as Mr Doll said putting us a big box store putting us into a difficult position
Would also like to take you to page 8 9 pages 8 9 and 10 These numbers on this chart were developed oh
20
129
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
about a foot of snow ago in February of 2011 and the week of the Monday the 7 It was the coldest week in
Chanhassen for our winter last year These numbers are not reliable for determining the traffic impact These
numbers ignore peak traffic seasons and they ignore the a m hours And they look like they re only going
one direction which is also in the direction of the big box store parking lot It ignores how the traffic is going
to flow out 100 of the traffic comes out of the traffic of Walmart and it goes either north or south on
Powers Boulevard The impact analysis also ignores the impact on Auburn Road the businesses on Park
Road on Lake Road Will the gentleman from Walmart said that trucks are their life line to successful
business Well Walmart would be cutting off the life line to other businesses on Park Road Making it
difficult for them to have successful commerce They will be harassed by the additional traffic Also we have
a soccer field just adjacent to the proposed property Chanhassen Athletic Association I m sure is not happy
about sharing it s space with the traffic impact of Walmart I ask that the commission deny Walmart it s
request for a planned unit development on the basis that it is inconsistent with our comprehensive plan It
does not have the support of Chanhassen residents And I thank Walmart again for coming in here and I ask
everyone to remain respectful of them as well as to the commission and thank you for your time
Aller Thank you
Sarah Thomas Mr Chair Planning Commission members thank you My name is Sarah Thomas I live at
2555 Longacres Drive with my husband and 4 children who wanted to come but we figured it d be a late
night and in case you re not sure there are two other full rooms with people here I m asking for you on
behalf of myself and our family to request we re asking for you to deny this request I have learned through
my studies that the downtown area per the comp plan was approved to be guided to allow for some retail
however not to the degree that is being proposed Quite honestly I am shocked that this proposal is in front of
us I completely understand that it s concept and that Walmart doesn t want to put the money towards all the
specifics of a plan but I feel that there are too many deviations in what we ve seen as was stated to come
forward with grounds for you to approve something of this nature this evening I m not hearing words from
Walmart or the staff s review that Walmart has gone above and beyond the code or that they re exceeding the
ordinance If anything I m hearing the staff as well as Walmart well Walmart noting that they will try to
meet the code but staff saying that there are concerns and challenges and that what s being proposed is
detrimental and doesn t meet the code I see few if any design features that are very technological such as
rain gardens French drainage systems permeable pavement things that if Walmart wanted to give a benefit
to the city I think should be part of their concept plan If approved I m wondering what would happen when
the big box leaves I was recently in St Cloud and I saw that the Walmart and Sam s Club is vacant because
they built bigger stores closer to the freeway so I didn t quite understand the broker s comments about why
this site It sounded to me like he was saying this site was too small for a Lowe s and too small for other big
box retailers His comments were not clear to me I would also like to hand something out Paul if you
wouldn t mind that it s one item that really hasn t been touched on tonight I ll go quickly but this
information that I have is in relation to the taxes What you ll see in the handout is some tax information
The value is slightly increased for the new Walmart to mirror the per square foot value of the Target in
Chanhassen so the chart is going to outline the 2011 property taxes generated by a currently office warehouse
which is the 208 295 Please note that do you have enough
Aanenson Yeah we re going to put it up there
Sarah Thomas Okay Please note that due to fiscal disparities in the statewide commercial industrial tax the
total amount excuse me annual amount that the City of Chanhassen received in 2011 is only 18 062 The
comparison values on nearby Walmart s should be more than reasonable for the purposes of reviewing this
tonight Walmart is proposing to tear down the current building which is the 3 5 million dollar value and
construct anew Walmart After construction the total taxes would be estimated to 325 871 City taxes
being 28 269 If you re following the math the important point is that the difference between what is there
now and what Walmart is proposing is 10 207 This figure should negate the benefits that Walmart stated
21
130
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
that they will bring to town I believe there are many strains that Walmart s coming to town would bring in
relation to traffic and the environment as well as police protection which was brought up by Walmart I
didn t see that information in the staff report but I do believe that there will be increased crime whether that
be petty theft I m not sure but we know that it just comes with the people The Villager article that I recently
read stated that the Eden Prairie Walmart generates 380 000 in property taxes a year Unfortunately the
general public doesn t understand the way that our tax system works Only 38 000 of this money went to the
City of Eden Prairie Unfortunately I realize it s hard to believe but it s our current tax system in Minnesota
and the metro area and that is what it is So I d like you to be advised and the public to know that those who
were thinking that Walmart was beneficial because of taxes 10 000 just doesn t seem like we should roll
out the red carpet and allow all of these deviations to come into our city I know a lot of other people want to
speak I had a lot more that I wanted to say but I am quite pleased with staff s review of the proposal I guess
one other thing was in relation to the jobs and I just question how many of those jobs will be Chanhassen
residents 12 00 an hour jobs don t seem tome to behead of household type jobs I know where kids need
jobs but those kids can drive to Carver or wherever Walmart wants to go I know Carver was proposed at one
point in time in Carver I m not sure why that fell apart but I don t think there are that many people in
Chanhassen that would view that to be that favorable to allow it in this location and again to allow that
number of deviations so I thank you very much for your time and good luck with your decision
Tim Bloudek Good evening My name is Tim Bloudek I live at 1171 Homestead Lane I m a 25 year
resident of Chanhassen I am also against the rezoning to allow Walmart to access to our city in the business
climate You know I don t have a lot of facts and figures I just have some opinions Some observations and
Walmart said they re here to listen as I assume you are You know I don t believe that we need what
Walmart has to offer It is certainly a duplication of supply chain We have many of the services that we
need in duplicate and triplicate and more in certain cases You know traffic has been discussed I believe
that s an issue You know I just don t believe that there s any real benefit in the quality of life that Walmart
would bring I am happy to be in the top one of the top 10 cities in the United States We did it without
Walmart I think we ll be I think we ll be fine you know as we go forward It certainly doesn t fit with my
view of what the community needs or wants in a retail district I just don t believe Walmart needs to be
Chanhassen needs to be one of the thousands of locations that Walmart has worldwide I do admire Walmart
in their logistic prowess Their ability to generate profit for their shareholders I commend them for the
sustainability efforts They do a very fine job in that area and you know I commend them for their charitable
efforts For me I just don t want what they have to offer in our city and I would ask Walmart to not waste our
time or their time and resources in pursuing the city of Chanhassen site Thank you
Ellis Thomas My name is Ellis Thomas I live at 406 West 76 Street I ve been a member of this
community since 1967 when you drove in from the east there was a population that said Chanhassen 240 so
there s been some changes that s taken place in my tenure in this community One of the disadvantages of
being the fourth speaker is that many of the first 3 speakers said what I had in my mind when I thought when
I was going to come up here so my I don t have a lot of statistics Mine is more or less an emotional plea and
that is I m proud of this community the way it is I d like to commend you the council the mayor although I
don t see him I d like to commend the staff for developing a community that I can be proud of and that I can
be proud to have people come and visit I go to other communities and I said boy are they missing it and I
won t miss those I won t mention those names because I don t want to offend anybody but I m proud of this
community and like the gentleman I believe Tim was his name said you know we live in a community that s
within the top 10 of the United States and we got here without Walmart And I see I ve heard horror stories
I won t mention them You know it s hearsay but I hear a lot of mom and pop outfits going belly up when
Walmart comes into the community and I sort of thing Chanhassen has a lot of mom and pop type outfits
You take a look at an organization like Target Okay I go down to Target If you go to Target you ll
probably see me but I know those people down there It s just a friendly environment It s a large
communication but it s friendly and you can pretty well get what you want If you don t why there s other
places you can go Cub is a nice store Byerly s There s all Ace Hardware My goodness those people
22
131
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
have been in business for years and years and years and you know if you want to go to some other place that
sells something cheaper go do it Of course you re going to end up spending money on the gas to get there so
you ve got the convenience of these stores Please don t bring in Walmart Those guys they just come into a
community and we re not going to be in the top 10 anymore if they re here That s my feeling
Brad Karels Brad Karels 8105 Dakota Lane 5 year resident of Chanhassen I d like to thank the
commission the folks from Walmart and mostly I d like to thank everyone from the community who showed
up Everyone in the other room Thanks for coming out I know we re short on time I ll try to keep this
brief and stay on point I d like to speak specifically to the environmental impact of the site specifically to
one issue that was not addressed that has very little to do with zoning or code or anything else and that s non
point source water pollution which in some people s opinion is the leading cause of water pollution in the
United States I don t want to read but I want to stay on point and make sure I cover all my points I
apologize One single acre of impermeable surface can generate at most 25 000 gallons of runoff during a 1
inch storm and here we re looking at about 9 acres of impermeable surface if I read that correctly Runoff
from these impermeable surfaces leads to erosion flooding and the flow pollutants such as oil fertilizer
pesticides and heavy metals into our waterways We have Riley Creek running through the property and
we re adjacent to a wetland There s some planned improvements but there s no way to control non point
source water pollution The United States Institute of Traffic Engineers determined that on average an
average sized Walmart attracts 850 automobiles per hour and most of them are open 24 hours a day so that s
850 hourly opportunities for cars to leave pollutants behind on the impermeable surface to be washed into our
waterways long after they ve departed and I very much doubt that a little retaining wall 15 feet from the
wetlands going to do much good There s also solid waste concerns Discarded food wrappers cups bits of
plastic and the like all easily carried by wind across their parking lot directly into the creek the surrounding
community onto the highway and into other parts and recreational areas and there s not much again the
organization can do about that kind of pollution entering our community The proposed occupant has a long
history of environmental violations many which directly related to the Clean Water Act They ve paid
millions in fines and civil penalties for their reckless practices and even though they pay the damage is
already done and now they could be doing that damage here and I would really prefer to see that not happen
In Connecticut they were heavily fined for threatening rivers and streams with chemical pollution and their
then Attorney General Richard Blumenthal noted that Walmart s environmental record seems as low as their
prices He went on to say that in that state they had systematic repeated violations across the state In
summary our hope is that we will not see any of this blatant disregard for the environment here As a
community we seek assurances from this body that every aspect of the local ecosystem will be considered and
that those resources if they cannot be guaranteed protection that this rezoning not be recommended to the
City Council Thank you
Todd Neils Good evening My name is Todd Neils and I m a 30 year resident of Chanhassen having grown
up with it and eventually moving my family back so I could raise them in the town in which I grew up in
I ve had the opportunity to address both Park and Rec Commission as well as City Council on a number of
different issues over the years but this is my first time with the Planning Commission and I appreciate your
time I m here tonight to talk about the assumed tax benefit of big box stores such as Walmart is supposed to
bring I heard the Mayor on Channel 5 and he was talking about about 380 000 in additional tax revenue
and hundreds of jobs that this big box store will provide I d like to briefly address 3 points First according
to public record the parcel of land which Walmart wants to occupy paid 208 394 in property taxes in 2011
This is a 5 4 increase over 2010 and really only means a true economic benefit is 171 606 Second the
Civic Economics Group published a study commissioned by the Andersonville Development Corporation in
October 2004 This study shows that locally owned businesses generates 70 locally more local economic
impact per square foot than big box retailers This group analyzed locally owned restaurants retail stores and
service providers on Chicago s north side and compared them to national big box retailers competing in the
same category The bottom line of the study is that for every 100 spent on independent retailers in our
community it creates 68 in additional local activity while spending the same 100 at that big box retailer
23
132
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
only provides 43 This is a 36 less in overall economic impact on the local community Another study for
the Institute for Local Self Reliance and Friends of Mid Coast Maine in September showed that 3 times as
much money stays in the local economy when you buys goods and services from locally owned businesses
This survey found that businesses with combined sales of 5 7 million dollars in 2002 spent 44 6 with the
surrounding two counties with an additional 8 7 spent within the state This is 53 3 spent when shopping
locally The analysis estimates that a national big box retailer operating would return only 14 1 of it s local
economy in the form mostly of payroll The rest leaves the state flowing to out of state suppliers or back to
corporate headquarters My third and final point is the creation of jobs The Center for Urban Research and
Learning at Loyola University in Chicago commissioned in December 2009 shows that opening of a Walmart
on the west side of Chicago in 2006 led to the closure of one quarter of the businesses within a 4 mile radius
They tracked 306 businesses Checking their status before Walmart opened and 1 to 2 years after By the
second year 82 of those businesses had closed locally Businesses within close proximity had a 40 chance
of closing Sales tax and unemployment data provided by the State of Illinois for Walmart zipcode and
surrounding zipcodes confirmed that the overall sales and employment in the neighborhood did not increase
but actually dipped from trend line They noted there is no evidence that Walmart sparked any significant net
growth in economic activity or employment in the area A second study by the Review of Economics and
Statistics in February 2005 shows that job creation is a myth This study examines the impact of arrival of a
Walmart store on retail and wholesale unemployment Or employment pardon me It looks at 1 749
counties that added a Walmart between 1977 and 1998 It finds that Walmart s arrival while boosting
employment by 100 jobs in the first year far less than 200 to 400 jobs the company says it s stores create
because it s arrival causes existing retailers to downsize and lay off employees With the potential additional
of 171 606 in additional income taking into account additional potential police calls traffic congestion
coupled with loss of local retail the numbers for this big box retailers just don t add up Thank you
Annie Fisher My name is Annie Fisher I ve lived in Chanhassen nearly 25 years I currently reside at 1321
Lake Drive West which is one block directly south of Park Road where this new Walmart is proposed to go
in I don t have many facts like other people I do have a lot of concerns when I leave these things My first
concern is just the general traffic We ve touched on that I drive at that intersection in and out every single
day It s a busy intersection and furthermore I see a lot of families pedestrians bike riders going on those
streets They re not safe right now as it is We don t need that further traffic to add to that Secondly I don t
need to go into detail on the local business competition It won t provide jobs We know that My next
concern is the heighten crime rate With this being a 24 hour development I don t feel comfortable living two
blocks away from something that s open 24 hours and that s Walmart has a proven higher crime rate than
Target in terms of incidents that involve the police Not to mention the property values I don t feel
comfortable living there Again it s going to drive crime traffic It s not good for our property What I d
like to state is that I don t think Walmart offers anything that our community doesn t already provide and if
we do need something Walmart has I m fine sacrificing 10 minutes to go down the road to Eden Prairie than
to sacrifice the safety of our community Again I don t have many facts but the few terms I ve heard thrown
around tonight are things like it does not meet requirements there are many deficiencies or it meets minimum
standards and I m proud to live in this community and I don t think we got in the top 10 by meeting minimum
standards so with that
Bill Fisher My name is Bill Fisher I live at 1321 Lake Drive West Apartment 225 I m also a board
member of the Powers Ridge Homeowners Association That was my wife Thank you board members
Thank you Walmart Thank you community for coming out I also work for a local business Lakewinds
Our store is probably about a quarter of the size one proposed and we have four access points I am a truck
driver for the store That s my biggest concern in and out I don t think I think your deficiencies have laid
out the access points to handle the type of traffic It s something we don t need It doesn t fit I think what
they won t tell you in the plan is they want to be on the eye of the competition because that site works for
them because they can see the competition across the street I can see more vertical development on that
corner Something with a condo and some restaurants and you know a couple shops there but they want to be
24
133
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
in sight of the competition you know I don t think your engineers have addressed not having enough access
points Why don t you have a pick a site where you can have 6 or 7 entry points and a separate truck way
like most of the other stores in the area have I think the community s come out in force and I think we ll say
thank you but no thank you to Walmart Thank you for your time
David Kressler My name is David Kressler I live at 1750 Valley Ridge Trail North I moved with my
family here in 1997 Moved back to the East Coast for a year and a half and moved by family back here again
in 2003 We sell for less always I know you know that slogan It s Walmart s It s seen on trucks and every
highway across the country It s a business model that succeeds for the company but it can destroy
communities How does Walmart sell for less always Well one is one way is that they have restrictive and
unforgiving supplier relationships They force lower prices from vendors in order to remain in that
partnership They control events of the supply chain such as delivery dates and requirements to their benefit
and to their partner s disadvantage I would recommend that you check out the scene from Walmart the high
cost of low price where the Walmart farming partner loses a good portion of his crop and profit because of
Walmart s control over scheduled pick up delivery and inspection dates A second way is hiring part time
low wage workers There s little in the way of affordable benefits for these people and there s little or no
hope of advancement for them There are other pure business advantages such as volume contracts
worldwide partner basis and the ability to use significant loss leader practices that are part of many different
businesses but the other ones are extremely important to our community What does selling for less always
bring about Well the outcome that I m most concerned about living here in Chanhassen is the well
documented assault on small local businesses Bicycle and toy stores small hardware stores pharmacies hair
salons party supply outlets tire and auto supplies just to name a few They can all be negatively affected
and possibly put out of business And if you hadn t noticed all of these types of businesses exist here in
Chanhassen Finally there s a negative effect on service providers such as lawyers and accountants that are a
part of the small business community Walmart does not use those people Our business our local businesses
do I m not against Walmart s right to exist and even to succeed but I do not support their business model and
I do not believe that Walmart is a good match for the city of Chanhassen I firmly believe that there are other
better options that will allow Chanhassen to grow while maintaining the characteristics that have repeatedly
placed it among the best places to live in America I hope the planning committee will recommend against
Walmart s proposed development in Chanhassen
Elizabeth Kressler Good evening my name is Elizabeth Kressler I live at 1750 Valley Ridge Trail North
here in Chanhassen I m also representing the 1 030 people that signed our petition on change org I have a
sample for council of 840 signatures that you can look at The majority of them are Chanhassen residents
Everything that everybody has said while I came up here to say a lot of what everybody already has said but I
also invite you to look at big box retail It is a site with many many reports on it and one of them Mr Neils
had referenced a report that was very recent and it involved closures of stores and loss of jobs and real estate
and it s just not recent that this has been happening In Iowa the University of Iowa conducted a study and
between 1983 and 1993 there was 7 326 Iowa businesses that went under because of Walmart 555 grocery
stores 291 apparel stores and 298 hardware stores all in the state of Iowa All due to the fact that Walmart
moved in to their small town I d like you again to take a look at those at that site and the majority of those
reports I would say 98 of them are all based on what happens when Walmart comes in Thank you very
much
Christine Callahan Hi I m Christine Callahan I live at 8595 Drake Court in Chanhassen We built our
house in 1994 so I ve been here for a good deal of the growth I m not going to talk about Walmart so you
can rest easy I would like to address the Planning Commission and your role in planning This site as we ve
already talked about is not zoned for what Walmart wants to do What Lowe s might want to do What
Home Depot might want to do so I would draw your attention to the goals and policies of the comprehensive
plan which I believe guide the planning decisions The first one is to develop and maintain the City s land
use plan so it is utilized as a fundamental tool for directing the community s growth and I think that s why
25
134
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
you have 3 rooms full of people tonight because people want to participate in the City s direction and growth
Another goal is Chanhassen will continue to encourage the location of commercial uses in the central business
district Commercial development outside the central business district and it s fringe should complement the
central business district Clearly this sort of business won t complement the downtown The City will
maintain a comprehensive and up to date set of ordinances to ensure that development is consistent with the
plan while resulting in high quality sensitively designed projects So this is part of our comprehensive plan
In 2008 the City spent a lot of money a lot of time planning a regional mall out by Highway 212 on Powers
This is a question to the Planning Commission Has anyone studied the impact of this project on that project
Aanenson Yes That s why the two places were guided There is no additional property in the downtown
anywhere guided for this type of use in the city right now
Christine Callahan Okay
Aanenson There is no other site for them to go in the city that s got the current zoning in place The
downtown the regional commercial district says it has to be master planned The intent is that to be a unified
development so it s again a completely different draw Different types of uses I think when we had the open
houses it was clear from the residents what their expectations were That it not be big box users That it be a
truly lifestyle center with entertainment component mix so that s why additional commercial was attached to
the downtown core This community commercial district
Christine Callahan Okay I appreciate your answer and I think that it also points to my comment that then
this isn t the place for a big box retail That the citizens of Chanhassen have laid out a plan that doesn t
include this kind of business whether it s Walmart or anyone else and I think that if we re not going to end up
like sorry for the reference Apple Valley or Roseville cities that don t have a downtown They have sort of
a sprawling business district that isn t confined to one pedestrian friendly area I think we need to keep the
zoning the way it is Thank you
Colleen Cannon Good evening
Aller Good evening
Colleen Cannon My name is Colleen Cannon I live at 8110 Marsh Drive and I ve been a Chanhassen
resident for 15 years Just two quick things I wanted to call the committee s attention there are a lot of
opinions here tonight and I have mine as well but I just thought you might be able to use a little more data so I
wanted to call your attention to a study that was done by Kenneth Stone Professor of Economics at Iowa
State University and it s entitled the Economic Impact of Walmart Supercenters on Existing Businesses in
Mississippi and just to take a couple of seconds to read a couple of the conclusions there First Walmart
Supercenters in Mississippi captured most of their food sales from existing food stores in the host county and
existing businesses at the end of 5 years lost about 20 of their generated income Furniture stores in host
county experienced an increase in sales for the first 3 years but declined in years 4 and 5 Building material
stores in host counties experienced average losses of 8 to 15 for the first 5 years after the opening of a
superstore The Walmart supercenters capture substantial amounts of miscellaneous retail trade from host
counties ranging up to 12 by the fifth year etcetera You get the idea so I just thought you might want to
factor some of that in because they re going to be taking business from businesses that I think we all
appreciate and really enjoy like Byerly s I m originally from New York I brought my parents here They d
never seen anything like Byerly s You wouldn t believe the expressions on their faces I think it s a real it s
something that we should be proud of having in Chanhassen so that s the first thing I want to say Second
thing I would just want to say real quick is that we have an exchange student from China with us this year and
I was so proud to be able to bring him tonight to show him the democratic process in action so thank you so
much
26
135
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
Dave Enright My name is Dave Enright 795 Ponderosa Drive Just got a very quick comment I guess We
started the planning session mentioning and talking a lot about the limited physical area of this site and I m
now finally I was sitting in the other room with about 100 other people and I m now looking at this plan and
my question is is more so now I just moved to Minnesota about 4 or 5 years ago and even I know it snows a
lot here so my question is where does all the snow go You talked about the parking spaces and the trucking
I m trying to figure out here where the 2 or 3 feet of snow go so I just wanted to state that for the record
That s all Thanks
Aller Okay the line s please come forward
Scott Hadden Hello Well maybe we saved the best for last We ll see My name is Scott Hadden I live in
Victoria and I ve actually I m an optometrist and I ve worked inside the Bloomington Walmart Vision
Center for 17 years since that store opened and I do not work for Walmart I m an independent contractor
there None of the Walmart folks know I m here I haven t talked to any of them Just heard the meeting was
tonight and I would be the lease holder in this Chanhassen store and I just a couple of myths as far as for the
community that I just wanted to throw out my concept because I ve spent more time in a Walmart than this
whole room combined I m sure You know looking at the websites and the Chanhassen Villager somehow
there seems to be a stereotype that everybody that comes into Walmart is low income petty thief you know
all these kind of things as I ve heard some really disturbing comments and in East Bloomington the
economics are much different than Chanhassen but I see people of every socioeconomic level I see people
whose names you would all recognize Retired professional athletes Corporate executives Performers
You know executives There s all different socioeconomic levels and I love it I love I see low income I
see middle income and I see high income and I think that s what s great about our country Second thing I
saw somewhere that somebody said they don t go into Walmart come out feeling clean My goodness
Walmart s put hundreds of millions of dollars and I m sure Lisa here would say in remodeling I saw a retail
consultant as a patient and he came in and he s like wow You know you re going to look like Target and
have the low prices of Walmart you re going to get everybody And the third thing is and really I think the
biggest concern for the community is the impact Walmart has on small businesses Again the Bloomington
store opened in 1995 and there s a little hardware store right in the corner Still there Still open A bakery
right between There s a Home Depot that opened too by the way two blocks the other way and a bakery
who I do see the owner of the bakery and his a bunch of his staff his managers patients and he was really
concerned about the impact Walmart was going to have on him His business he bought the building behind
him and expanded his business so I think I think the key take away and you know there s always going to be
competition The companies that embrace competition and grow and thrive and adapt are the ones that are
going to be successful whether it s Walmart that comes in or another retailer down the road there s always
going to be competition and I think it s competition that makes us all great so anyway I know you ve got a lot
of tough decisions I m sure the smart people at Walmart and for the City will come out with ways to work
this out but thanks for listening and hope I see you guys in the future for eye glasses
Bill Shubert I m Bill Shubert I have been in Chanhassen for 5 years this round I was here about 15 years
ago for another 5 years Was able to move back to the area I have a few things first of all for everybody to
remember there were arguments against Byerly s when Byerly s moved in It worked out well People you
know but that s thanks to the commissions the people all working together and identifying what has worked
well That said I don t think this would work well I apologize but point of order am I able to ask questions
of the Walmart people
Aller Why don t you ask me the question and then
Bill Shubert Alright The statement there were a number of statements by the Walmart staff to 250 to 300
jobs The follow up statement to that was 12 15 an hour for full time positions What percentage of those
27
136
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
positions are going to be full time when they say 250 to 300 jobs We ve already heard a statement that the
reality of you know there s a net job component In an effort to prove the community worth Walmart also
stated the benefit of trying to concentrate products to help reduce what s delivered It s easier for the person
to take it away That would also note that that is I would also be supporting the smaller shelf size and giving
them more retail space available so whether it was beneficial for the customer or beneficial for Walmart one
should decide That of course supports the previous individual s statement of Walmart forcing suppliers to do
what they would like Two last points First they were kind enough to do to the State 14 5 million dollars
in charity in Minnesota That is commendable I would like to know a straight number is wonderful but I
would like to know what was the percentage of profit in Minnesota percentage of revenue when you look at
that 14 5 million dollars Is that 1 7 12 So giving back to the State of Minnesota of course I hope
everybody here has in their heart charitable giving and knows that there is fortunately a tax benefit with it
The last item was the question that everybody s had on their mind why here Almost an unfortunate say was
the response by the realtor who had stated it is the best location for the retailer Now think about that
carefully What we need to do here is decide what is the best location for our community Thanks
Katherine Peterson My name is Katherine Peterson I live at 7713 Vasserman Place We have lived in
Chanhassen 6 years We moved here because we like the rural feel that we have in this community I have
no facts and figures about things All I have is the reality of what I have seen what Walmart has done to my
hometown of Litchfield Drive one hour and 15 minutes west of here and you will drive down Main Street
that is practically a ghost town There are no small businesses Very few I should say Very few small
businesses left and I would hate to see that happen in Chanhassen Thank you
Aller Another person coming up Thank you
Margaret DiMarco Hi I have just a quick comment My name is Margaret DiMarco I live at 1131 Dove
Court here in Chanhassen I ve been here about 14 years and my neighborhood is on Powers Boulevard and
there s two entrances to our neighborhood off of Powers Boulevard and I m very concerned about the traffic
level that s going to take place on that road I was taking a look at your traffic analysis and just in 2013 we re
looking at 2 cars per minute during the high peak time of day and that s the time of day where I m going to
be taking my kids to swimming or some kind of sport practice and I already have today a hard time getting
out of my neighborhood so I m thinking the City s going to have to end up putting stop lights in to
accommodate that traffic level so I just wanted to make that comment so that you d be aware of that as well as
everything else that s said here tonight Thank you
Aller Thank you Ms DiMarco Okay is there anyone else that would like to come forward Please do so
Anyone in the other rooms that would like to come around please come forward
Deb Lloyd Hello My name s Deb Lloyd I live at 7302 Laredo Drive I ve lived in Chanhassen for 31
years and I ve been experienced speaking to the Planning Commission many over a course of many years but
I haven t seen this commission recently I ve never seen in 7 years of sitting and addressing this group so
many participants from the community and I really applaud them for coming out because that s what
America s all about Speaking up With respect to what your job is and that s looking at this plan presented
to you tonight I did have a couple different points that no one else has addressed yet One is this Carver
County map It has shading in this area which I kind of wondered about It didn t address anything
specifically in the staff report so I was really curious about is this orange and I did a little study and there
actually aren t any businesses tonight that have really commented about the effects coming down Park Road
so it turns out that like all these parcels basically highlighted except this one are all paying they re all owned
by the same people So IWCO or I Star Minnesota s Inc taxes on all those parcels which may be why you re
not hearing much from the immediate neighbors like you normally would And then pertinent to the
comprehensive plan and this proposal like someone did say already Walmart did not put it s best efforts
forward on this Usually when there s a PUD that comes to you it s because they re asking for something
28
137
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
exceptional and they re giving something in return This is so deficient It s the most deficient proposal I ve
ever seen come in 7 years of watching what s come forward Also what s not in here this is a bit of history
maybe for some of you Mark maybe you sat through this but we had a gentleman who owned property in
Chanhassen who was denied camping on his own property He made it kind of a long term homestead
granted but he was denied camping on his own property Walmart allows for RV s to park overnight in their
parking lot Now to me that s a campground in Chanhassen and I think that needs to be brought forward
And one other thing talking about sensitivity This was zoned for a 60 000 square foot facility We re
looking at double that Now I know Kate said this proposal is 30 pervious surface but boy my eye doesn t
say that It looks like more than 70 impervious and that has to be calculated infinitely because of the effect
that will have negatively on the creek and the sensitive site that we re talking about Thank you for your time
Aller Thank you
Kent Ludford Good evening
Aller Good evening
Kent Ludford My name is Kent Ludford 8615 Valley View Court Everybody has already commented on
all my thoughts about tonight s meeting Questions I drive from my home just off of Audubon down
Audubon Park Road Turn left to go up Powers Wait for the light Go up to 78 Street and go to my place
of business I do that 13 days on get 2 days off Start all over again But my thinking is if I understood
what they were telling me it s right in right out That right out then takes them to Audubon Back to 5 or
Audubon south to get back to Powers to get on the freeway When I get now any morning 7 15 in the
morning I pull up to that intersection I need to wait til the stop lights have changed I can get a pass both
cleared both ways Go up to the stop lights Stop lights at 7 15 in the morning will allow about 6 cars to go
through before they change back to yellow If there s a truck or a school bus sitting there and you re the sixth
car mostly likely you ll have to wait another 3 minutes for the lights to change again Now this is a normal
Monday through Friday 7 30 in the morning so I m thinking to myself we re going to make a right in a right
out all the way down to Park Road Two lanes You ve got a beautiful soccer field Kids love that It s an
evening thing I guess from what I m hearing most of their traffic is evening I can see that field getting 3
feet high in grass They can t use it The City put up no parking signs The street s too busy There s only
one places the parents park on the street That nice beautiful soccer field will be abandoned because they
can t use it Unless they want to walk from the generous Walmart s parking lot to walk over to play soccer I
have been doing this route for quite a few years I own a business in Chanhassen I own the Ace Hardware
store We moved into Chanhassen May 16 1983 We moved into the Frontier Lumber s or part of the
Dinner Theater complex It was Frontier Lumber and Herb was getting older Wanted to retire so I bought
him out just the hardware store I love this town I donate as much as I can to this town If I made their kind
of money I would be giving them 14 million a year too but I think for dollar for dollar what I m grossing
here compared to them I do a fairly nice job for the city Just want to add that we re here for the long haul
We ve been in business here for 28 years I m second generation My father started us out in 1950 and we
moved here after leaving North Minneapolis to New Hope and now here I want to stay here I have to
apologize to Walmart I do I can t talk about your business I don t understand your business I m a small
merchant but I have never walked into one of your stores ever in my life so I can t relate to how you operate
and I apologize for not helping you out So I am the second generation and I have run it the entire time it s
been in Chanhassen Last Saturday I reached that golden age I m now 66 years old I could retire so I figure
tome retirement is leaving my 65 hour a week job and I ll cutback and go to about 40 But my son works for
me He ll be third generation He s taking over I would like to cutback but I know to know it s survivable
for my son and his family My nephew who is now 40 something has worked for me since he was in high
school He ll be part of the new ownership and I want them to survive and be here for another 29 years but
that s all extra My concern is Park Road The viability of that soccer field for our kids and the traffic flow
29
138
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
If that light doesn t change it s going to take an awful long time to get 6 cars at a time northbound on Powers
Appreciate your time Thank you
Mike Boyer Hello My name s Mike Boyer 2370 Bridle Creek Circle I m actually a fairly recent resident
of Chanhassen having moved here a few years ago Returned to Minnesota from the East Coast I m not
going to go into a description of what the Walmart that came to Horsham Pennsylvania did to a reasonably
affluent small community there too Walmart decided I just want to I guess appeal to your prudence on one
thing I noticed that in the city plan that the economic study that evaluated just how much retail we would
support was conducted in 2006 I think they concluded that we needed about 110 000 additional square feet
of retail around the center of town This is 120 000 square feet Well I don t know about you but I ve noticed
that a lot of consumer spending habits have changed in the last few years The recession has been pretty
impactful Because of that wouldn t one think that perhaps it would be prudent to move incrementally or in
smaller pieces instead of expanding to a point beyond what the plan actually said ideally we could have
supported in more favorable economic times It leads to one of two consequences if we over expand is one
we ll either see damage to all the other local businesses or we re going to change our sleepy self servicing
community to something that has to become appeal to all the folks in the area around who are going to
become Eden Prairie or Roseville where everybody travels to us because we re just a shopping destination
Just consider please how much retail we could effectively support given the change in spending habits
Thank you
Robby Virnig My name is Robby Virnig I live at 26380 Shorewood Oaks Drive in Shorewood but I ve
been an employee of Target for a year and a half The thing I m really worried about is the Walmart from
what I m hearing is it s going to be 24 7 The thing I m worried about is the loss of profits from the stores
that aren t open that Walmart will be taking due to it being opened 24 7 and I just really wanted to keep my
job at Target so that s just all I really wanted to say
Kristy Brackett My name is Kristy Brackett I live at 1320 Lake Susan Hills Drive in Chanhassen That s
two blocks away from the proposed site I have two small children who we do a lot of activity in that area
Lots of walking The traffic on Powers Boulevard with the semi s coming through in the middle of the night
are going to impact our house probably quite significantly We already can hear quite a bit in that area so the
noise pollution would be a big thing for us I also have a concern about school bus safety Our particular
neighborhood will be bused to and from Chan Elementary which comes right through that intersection It s
already a really difficult intersection to get through so I can see that as being a potential problem and safety
for my children I also wanted to bring up I didn t hear anything about lighting for this Walmart I noticed
that other Walmart s that the lighting is pretty significant and tall I can see that impacting our neighborhood
quite significantly as well and we already get quite a bit from the high school that just went in on Friday
nights so I m imaging being sandwiched between those two pretty big lighting fixtures so I don t know I
didn t get to read the whole report but I would hope that that would be addressed in some sort of lighting
fixtures if that was something that you could look at If there s an ordinance about that Thank you
Aller Thank you
David Brackett My name is David Brackett My wife just spoke We live at 1320 Lake Susan Hills Drive
We are roughly two blocks away from this giant building and everybody s spoken about the traffic issues
Everybody s spoken about the environmental issues and so on but what hasn t really been I don t think
officially addressed is that Walmart has been known as a predatory company They come in They clean out
They go after Target They go after other businesses That s what they do There s no reason for them to be
in that spot other than to look at Target and to take them down and to take down everybody else in this town
No offense to Walmart but I ve studied business I m a business student I ve been involved with study
groups that have actually studied Walmart and this is what they ve done since the early 90 s and it s just the
30
139
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
way they are and they re going to ruin this town We will lose our marking We will no longer be considered
a small town We won t even be in the top 10 We ll probably be in the bottom 10 Thank you
Aller Is there anyone else who would like to come forward at this time and speak Give it a couple seconds
Anybody coming from the other rooms Okay we re going to close the public hearing at this time I d like
to thank each and every one of you for coming tonight and participating in this process Providing us with
your input At this time I ll ask commissioners for discussion
Undestad Well you re looking at me I ll jump in here
Aller There you go
Undestad Obviously we ve heard all about Walmart tonight and so I m not going to talk about any obviously
the laundry list of things to do for a project like this This proposal The whole package Nor am I going to
talk about Walmart What I m going to come back to is our site This specific site Where we were at What
we decided What we wanted to do with this site which is why we came to the 60 000 square foot
Audience Mark you re hard to hear
Undestad That s me No I was just talking about you know the specific site Not so much Walmart but I
think even if Mr Ludford wanted to put 120 000 feet on here we d probably have to say no It s the size of
the project The size of the site All the issues that were already brought out on the City s list and again when
we looked at this whole area for that commercial business we talked about limiting the size of a so called big
box to 60 000 feet for this reason You know who gets there first Is it Lowe s Is it Home Depot Is it you
know whoever One of those on there and that s it The rest of the businesses the rest of the property around
this we don t get to do the same thing I think we originally set out to do Going with you know 120 000 foot
grade it all down throw it all in and go So again you know it s not specifically Walmart although I know
Walmart s a big name and it s what everybody s focusing on To me I think it s more the site The size of
the site and no matter who s bringing a project like that in I don t think it s what we had in mind for that site
to begin with
Aller Anyone Ms Hokkanen
Hokkanen I agree with Mark on the whole concept of the taking the Walmart aside or out of the picture
The traffic The issues that have been brought up I m concerned with the deficiencies and the number of
deficiencies that have been brought to our attention that maybe could have been resolved before bringing it to
the Planning Commission so I kind of agree How can we approve it at this point given what has been
presented to us That s about all I have to say
Tennyson Yeah I agree with both of the commissioners there It just seems like it s trying to fit a square
peg in a round hole It s not the right site and nobody s really explained how it can be made to work with
parking and the particularly the wetland and creek issue with the creek running right there so
Thomas Go ahead
Ellsworth Yeah okay There s been a lot of emotion in the room tonight That s very clear It s actually
very exciting to see the community turn out and have this kind of conversation but I think a few of the
speakers really hit it well when they talked about the comprehensive plan I think that s the focus That s the
focus for this body and it s what the board or the City Council is looking to us to recommend to them based
on how this fits or does not fit within the comprehensive plan and that s been brought up a few times and I
think the points have been very salient We ve heard comments like it doesn t fit It s too big You look at
31
140
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
the plan and look at some of the deficiencies that staff has pointed out and to me at least it s clear it doesn t
fit and then when we have to figure out how to make it fit and request a planned unit development and have
different requirements and raise the aesthetics they clearly this Walmart missed the mark It simply did not
come in above and that s why I asked earlier I said well didn t you bring your best game Why wouldn t you
bring your best game for this and so I think the property and please don t applaud It s not a popularity
contest today though I appreciate the emotion in the room but certainly the site is zoned for commercial and
that s what s ultimately going to go there and we should all expect that and anticipate and that is the reflection
of the community through the process of the comprehensive plan and that reflects the values of the
community And so now what type of building or development goes in there certainly is the debate and the
discussion and we have I think lots of good guidance in the comprehensive plan I spent a fair amount of time
going through the comprehensive plan Looking at the goals and looking at this proposal and trying to reach
some sort of conclusion and I certainly concur with the other commissioners that this is not the right project
for this I applaud Walmart for their interest in our community and I think it bodes well for us and reflects
well on us as a community that they d like to come here I think their effort though falls very short and that s
how I plan to vote
Aller Commissioner Doll
Doll I agree with all of the commissioner statements and it d be nice in the future when a site would to be
developed that we would get more as much input or more input from the community It was really good to
see the people come out As this is I don t see it
Thomas Now it s my turn
Aller Your turn
Thomas Okay fabulous I too do agree with the Planning Commissioners I realize it s a concept PUD plan
and like we just said eventually it will be a commercial retail site That s should be expected but I have to
follow the comprehensive plan and that s our guidance here It s not like the other commissioners said a
popularity contest It s not about who comes to town It s about how it s designed to fit in our community
and it s about how it follows the comprehensive plan and what we set forth and I know it s up to
interpretation but at the same time when the City sets forth these findings of facts and says this is what we
need I can t look at a plan that comes in here and says this is what we need but we don t have it yet and I
that s what I have to follow by I have to follow by our rules and our governing laws to ensure that what gets
put forth in the city of Chanhassen is acceptable and follows the rules and regulations because if any one of
you came and asked for a permit to do something that was outside of what you could do on your property we
would be the governing body and you would expect us to follow the same rules and laws for you and that s all
we re trying to do so with what s put forth right here I can t approve it is as it is because we ve got missing
findings of facts that need to be settled first and that would require for whoever ever goes on that site so that s
all I have to say
Aller Okay As I said in the beginning I think the big issue before us as I was concerned is what kind of
neighborhoods do we want to create in the city of Chanhassen What kind of development do we want to
bring here and it s been said many times before all kinds of bodies and all kinds of businesses that if you fail
to plan you plan to fail We have a plan It s been working out very well I think the leadership with the
mayor and the City Council in doing that and with the assistance and support of planning has brought us to
where we are today where we re consistently in the top places to live in the country and obviously you as a
community are very proud of that We are very proud of that and in looking at this I don t see anything that
says to me we should step outside the plan so I would not support it as presented So with that I will hear and
entertain any motions
32
141
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
Doll I have a motion
Aller Commissioner Doll
Doll The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends denial of the concept planned unit development
based on the findings of the planned unit development as stated in the staff report
Aller I have a motion Do I have a second
Undestad Second
Aller I have a motion and a second
Doll moved Undestad seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends denial of the
Concept Planned Unit Development based on the Findings of the Planned Unit Development as stated
in the staff report for Planning Case 2011 11 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously
with a vote of 7 to 0
Aanenson Chairman maybe we can take just 5 minutes and let the room clear and then we can go through
the rest of the meeting
Aller We can go through the rest of the meeting So we ll take a 5 minute recess
The Planning Commission took a short recess at this point in the meeting
APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Thomas noted the verbatim and summary minutes of the
Planning Commission meeting dated October 18 2011 as presented
COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS None
CITY COUNCIL ACTION UPDATE
Aanenson The City Council updates would be there was no agenda items for the 26 so we haven t had
anything but I do want to point out we do not have a meeting scheduled for your November 15 We did
have one item that we re doing a PUD amendment on and that actually got moved to December 6 We also
do anticipate a replat of subdivision and that s Boulder Cove which is north of Highway 7 so that s actually
coming in probably as a smaller lot subdivision as opposed to a twin and three homes so that will come in as a
replat so that will be in January so your next for sure the one meeting we usually have in December
Aller December 6th
Aanenson Yeah because usually we get too close to the holidays and band concerts and everything else so
Aller And that s Primrose
Aanenson That s Primrose and another amendment to the PUD for fast food and then the Boulder Cove
would be and something else still may come in for the January meeting but that s all I have for right now So
you ll have a week off
Aller Nothing further Entertain a motion to adjourn
33
142
Chanhassen Planning Commission November 1 2011
Ellsworth moved Doll seconded to adjourn the meeting All voted in favor and the motion carried
unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0 The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 9 40 p m
Submitted by Kate Aanenson
Community Development Director
Prepared by Nann Opheim
34
143
CHANHASSEN PARK AND
RECREATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING
SUMMARY MINUTES
OCTOBER 25 2011
Chairman Daniel called the meeting to order at 7 30 p m
MEMBERS PRESENT Jeff Daniel Steve Scharfenberg Tom Kelly Cole Kelly Elise Ryan Peter Aldritt and Brent Caron
STAFF PRESENT Jerry Ruegemer Recreation Superintendent
PUBLIC PRESENT
Todd Neils 990 Saddlebrook Curve
APPROVAL OF AGENDA Carron moved Tom Kelly seconded to approve the agenda as
presented All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS Tom Kelly announced that it was Brent Carron s birthday
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None
APPROVAL OF MINUTES Scharfenberg moved Carron seconded to approve the verbatim and
summary minutes of the Park and Recreation Commission meeting dated September 27 2011 with changes proposed by Cole Kelly on pages 10 11 and 13 All voted in favor and the motion carried
unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0
CONSIDER ACCEPTING DONATION OF DOUBLE BATTING CAGE FOR LAKE SUSAN
PARK CHANHASSEN ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Jerry Ruegemer presented the staff report on this item Commissioner Scharfenberg asked for
clarification of the use of electricity for the pitching machines lighting and the layout of the batting cages Commissioner Tom Kelly asked about the City s cost for excavating aggregate and who s
responsible for repairs Todd Neils discussed moving the fencing around for the dugouts
Cole Kelly moved Carron seconded that the Park and Recreation Commission recommends that
the City Council accept the donation of two 12 x 12 x 70 mesh batting cages nets for installation and public use at Lake Susan Park and moving the dugout fences as proposed by the Chanhassen
Athletic Association All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0
RECREATION PROGRAM REPORTS
2011 RESERVATION PICNIC SITE EVALUATION Jerry Ruegemer provided highlights of the
2011 picnic site evaluations Cole Kelly asked about maintenance projects and deposit returns Tom Kelly asked why there were no picnics at Lake Susan Park on Sunday s
CHANJAM 11 PREVIEW REPORT Jerry Ruegemer discussed the changes made to this event
moving it from April to November and changing the venue from the Chanhassen Rec Center to the
auditorium at the Chanhassen High School Steve Scharfenberg asked about food being available
144
Park and Recreation Commission Summary October 25 2011
COMMISSION MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS None
COMMISSION MEMBER PRESENTATIONS None
ADMINISTRATIVE PACKET None
OLD BUSINESS Cole Kelly suggested staff advertise in the spring on the City s website for paddleboat and kayak rentals
Carron moved Scharfenberg seconded to adjourn the meeting All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0 The Park and Recreation Commission meeting was
adjourned at 8 05 p m
Submitted by Todd Hoffman
Park and Rec Director
Prepared by Nann Opheim
2
145
CHANHASSEN PARK AND
RECREATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 25 2011
Chairman Daniel called the meeting to order at 7 30 p m
MEMBERS PRESENT Jeff Daniel Steve Scharfenberg Tom Kelly Cole Kelly Elise Ryan Peter
Aldritt and Brent Caron
STAFF PRESENT Jerry Ruegemer Recreation Superintendent
PUBLIC PRESENT
Todd Neils 990 Saddlebrook Curve
APPROVAL OF AGENDA Carron moved Tom Kelly seconded to approve the agenda as presented All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS
Tom Kelly I have a public announcement
Daniel Oh please
Tom Kelly Instead of spending his birthday with his wife Brent has decided to come today for our meeting to celebrate his birthday Take a few They re small
Daniel Tom thank you
Carron Thank you thank you
Daniel So those reservations at Axel s had to cancelled The whole works
Carron Yeah we ll do it some other time
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
Daniel I see that we have Mr Neils here Todd you re just observing today is that correct
Ruegemer He will I m sorry Mr Neils will be addressing new business item number 2
Daniel Okay great Thank you
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Daniel Alright let s move onto the approval of our minutes from our last meeting dated September 27
2011 If there s anything that needs to be changed added or addressed please do so Or note
Cole Kelly I think we should note that on pages 10 11 and 13 when we toss around numbers such as
633 and 205 we are meaning thousand It just got written out as the number and maybe those should be
146
Park and Recreation Commission October 25 2011
corrected in various spots Done by myself and Tom Kelly and Todd Hoffman Those are the only
changes I ve noticed
Daniel Thank you Cole
Scharfenberg Move for adoption of the minutes from the September 27 2011 meeting with those revisions as noted by Commissioner Kelly
Daniel Can we get a second
Carron Second
Scharfenberg moved Carron seconded to approve the verbatim and summary minutes of the Park
and Recreation Commission meeting dated September 27 2011 with changes proposed by Cole Kelly on pages 10 11 and 13 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of
7 to 0
CONSIDER ACCEPTING DONATION OF DOUBLE BATTING CAGE FOR LAKE SUSAN
PARK CHANHASSEN ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Ruegemer Thanks Chair Daniels Just wanted to present the item tonight Item number 2 Mr Neils is
in the crowd tonight and he can answer certainly any questions after staff presents the report So just to
give you a little the proposed motion is that the Park and Recreation Commission recommend that the City Council accept the donation of the two 12 by 12 by 70 mesh batting cages nets for installation at
Lake Susan Park for public use so just to give you a little background The CAA the Chanhassen Athletic Association would like to purchase install and donate the two mesh style batting cages with their
metal support posts to the City and then all donations of course exceeding 500 must be approved by the
City Council So the commission can review this item tonight and make a recommendation if they choose to do so Just give you a little background CAA is a parent run organization Been around the
community for over 40 years The City s had a lot of partnerships with the CAA in a number of different
projects throughout those 40 years So the CAA has certainly talked to area coaches that play in that particular location as well as the other areas and parks within our park system and just to give you a little
background Lake Susan did originally have a batting cage that was purchased by CAA and donated to
the City but a storm came through one summer day and kind of bent up everything All the metal and it was really beyond repair at that point and it was dismantled and disposed of at that point so so Lake
Susan has not had a batting cage for quite a few number of years now so CAA s really looking at really to kind of get that back up in action again and looking to do that yet this fall or next spring for that for the
CAA to partner with the City again to install a new batting cage system at Lake Susan As stated the
Association would pay and provide all the materials and supplies associated with the project and the City
would be responsible for kind of clearing the 30 by 80 aggregate area for the post so the City would be excavating the area and refilling it with an aggregate base suitable for the batting cage to be built up on
top of that And this work certainly would include us doing that and disposing of the soils for that base
area If you look on the back of the memo that would be the area if you look on the left field side or the west side of the ballfield kind of where that dark yellow object is here that s where the batting cages are
proposed to go in that general area and that s probably about well pretty close to where the other batting cages were at that point many years ago So it is the recommendation that the Park and Recreation
Commission recommend that City Council accept this generous contribution of two batting cage nets
from the Chanhassen Athletic Association for installation at Lake Susan Park
Daniel Okay We ll move on for discussion Commissioners any questions or comments
2
147
Park and Recreation Commission October 25 2011
Scharfenberg Todd I ve got a question for you if you want to approach In your memo on paragraph
two regarding the installation of the electricity keep that in there JUGS machine or lighting I mean I
guess I had a question when I saw lighting What that was referencing
Todd Neils Lighting to light the batting cage area
Scharfenberg Okay during the evening then
Todd Neils Potentially
Scharfenberg Okay so
Todd Neils Or dusk
Scharfenberg So what I don t know that I ve ever seen what s the I mean do you guys have an idea
that you are going to do that or is that something that just potentially we may do it at some point or
Todd Neils Yes Our intention is not necessarily to run lighting immediately but merely to have
electricity available specifically for JUGS machines With lighting possibly to come down the line
Scharfenberg Okay And one other thing I know it doesn t have anything to do with the cages At one
point you guys had spoken you on behalf of I don t know if it was the Dugout Club or CAA had talked
about putting a dugout set at Lake Susan as well Is that still your plan or is that kind of on a back burner right now
Todd Neils Based on the building guidelines necessary by the City of Chanhassen it s on the back
burner
Scharfenberg Okay
Daniel Okay thanks Steve Elise Tom
Tom Kelly Mr Chair I had a couple questions Do you know what the approximately cost would be of
the base material and the City s responsibility for the installation
Ruegemer Well you know obviously we d do everything in house through the park and rec department with that and we certainly have the equipment necessary to you know excavate that materials out in a very
timely fashion I don t know Todd do you have that number on the aggregate I don t have that but we
certainly staff can get that to you
Tom Kelly I mean is it hundreds of dollars or thousands of dollars
Ruegemer I would say it d be well under a thousand dollars
Tom Kelly And I m curious too will this is it going to be like Bandimere Will this always be open This batting cage even if there s a pitching machine inside
Ruegemer Well to my knowledge on pitching machines or JUGS machines and they re portable so they ll be kind of going in and out on a daily basis so there won t be any permanent batting cages or
pitching machines as there was at Lake Ann that were removed so it d be basically just kind of open
cages with the possibility of hooking up to power
3
148
Park and Recreation Commission October 25 2011
Tom Kelly Okay Who s responsible for any repairs
Ruegemer I would assume that the City would responsible for the with the repairs You know again
CAA will be purchasing and donating them to the City with helping out with you know kind of putting
the nets up on an annual basis We will take them down and store them in the wintertime so similar to the arrangement at Lake Ann If there s any type of repairs that sort of thing I m sure that we would be
Tom Kelly Okay
Daniel Alright thank you Tom Elise
Ryan No
Daniel Cole
Cole Kelly No
Carron Nothing
Daniel Brent Peter Okay great
Scharfenberg I have one other thing I m sorry Jeff Are the batting cages going to sit side to side I couldn t tell from the length or are they going to be kind of back to back
Todd Neils Side to side
Scharfenberg Side to side okay
Todd Neils The difference between the batting cages that are currently at Lake Susan or proposed to go
into Lake Susan and the ones that are currently at Lake Ann if you ve been to Lake Ann you ll see that the batting cages that were donated are affecting the exterior cage However the interior posts that are
proposed which are 3 inch outside diameter posts are holding up very well over at Lake Ann Park and
we ve configured the batting cage so that we would anticipate minimal repair necessary because the posts are probably most susceptible to bending and so on and so forth but because of the size and thickness of
the steel we don t anticipate any issues
Daniel Okay I don t have any questions either but certainly on behalf of the City want to thank you for
the donation
Ruegemer Chair Daniels I think Mr Neils would also like to talk about some moving some fencing
around the players benches bench areas
Daniel Okay
Todd Neils As you can see right now the current configuration has the batting cages or not the batting
cages The dugouts with open area to the playing field and what I m proposing is we would also while
we re having the batting cages installed we would flip flop so rather than having it open to the playing field we would effectively close it to the playing field for safety reasons because on a number of
occasions foul balls are hit into the dugouts and so by us flip flopping and again we would pay for this but
4
149
Park and Recreation Commission October 25 2011
flip flopping this and using as much of the same material that we is currently there repurposing it we
would have the ability to you know for safety reasons protect the players
Daniel Just moving the fence from the back to the front
Todd Neils Back to the front yep
Daniel And that s it Then it d exposed you re open to the back
Todd Neils Yes
Daniel So all the parents can come up and hassle their kids Alright sounds smart
Todd Neils When kids are playing at that age we hope that our parents aren t participating in the game as well
Daniel Yes
Ruegemer Todd have you guys considered leaving the back where it is and then adding a front component
Todd Neils Only because Mr Hoffman suggested it However if the long term proposal is to somehow
put dugouts in and at the very least a cement pad in that area for because that area gets very muddy and you know if we get a cement pad in there easier access to get the cement pad in without having to remove
the fences In addition to that by repurposing most of the materials we can reduce the cost
Daniel Okay So should we add that to the motion
Ruegemer That would be appropriate
Daniel Are there any objections well I should say right now are there any discussions I should say on this item with regards to the fencing
Cole Kelly No
Daniel I think everyone recognizes it as a safety issue I mean especially at this age As they get older dugouts are open but alright Let s go ahead and make a motion
Cole Kelly I ll propose a motion as stated by Jerry The Park and Rec Commission recommends the
City Council accept a donation of two 12 by 12 by 70 mesh batting cages nets for installation and public use at Lake Ann Park and we add to it that the fencing can be moved
Daniel Lake Susan
Cole Kelly Oh what did I say
Daniel Lake Ann
Cole Kelly Oh Lake Susan And the fences can be moved as proposed by the Chanhassen Athletic
Association
5
150
Park and Recreation Commission October 25 2011
Daniel In the dugouts
Cole Kelly In the dugouts
Daniel A second
Carron Second
Cole Kelly moved Carron seconded that the Park and Recreation Commission recommends that
the City Council accept the donation of two 12 x 12 x 70 mesh batting cages nets for installation
and public use at Lake Susan Park and moving the dugout fences as proposed by the Chanhassen Athletic Association All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0
th Ruegemer And that is scheduled on the November 14 City Council meeting for approval
Daniel Alright I don t see any issue with that I mean that s smart Alright
Scharfenberg May I interrupt
Daniel Yes
Scharfenberg We have a football update Chanhassen 20 Shakopee 6
Daniel No Really
Scharfenberg Yep
Daniel Excellent Glad to hear that Because I want to go to that Minnetonka Chanhassen game
RECREATION PROGRAM REPORTS
2011 RESERVATION PICNIC SITE EVALUATION
Daniel Alright Jerry let s talk about your 2011 picnic site evaluation And what I ve read through it sounds like it was an excellent year
Ruegemer It was an extremely busy year again in our department I certainly started out fielding a lot of
the phone calls for the picnic reservation process When Lindsey arrived here she was a great person to
kind of get kind of put into charge with answering phone calls and making the reservations so she pretty
much did a lot of the phone calls a lot of the legwork from oh for a good bulk of the summer and I think that was great experience for her and it really freed me up to do other things with my position so I really
hats off to Lindsey As you can see our paid reservations increased 23 which is great It was the most
that we ve ever had this year 122 And we just really hosted a lot of different varieties of you know events from reunions to weddings to graduation parties birthday parties baptisms company picnics
Kind of pretty much everything from A to Z on that We have a new top billing Hilltop now is our most popular site which I think the Park and Rec Commission should feel really good about you know
championing the cause on getting that built up on top of the hill so You know just really you know in
July and August we really did see a lot of increased company picnics out there from you know Bloomington s Edina s a lot of the 300 plus people picnics for that because you know word is getting
out that you know we have a very large capacity at this site and it s been extremely popular for outside
non resident companies coming into town and using our facilities which I think we all feel good about
6
151
Park and Recreation Commission October 25 2011
and they re extremely pleased with the layout of it The electricity The shelter itself It s been a great
addition to our park system Lake Susan is number two in the Lakeside pavilion believe it or not is a
very close third so as you can see by the numbers on the back with the categories And when we talk about total paid reservations those are ones that actually call and make the reservation Pay a fee for that
and there s many many many other you know companies that meet out there Family reunions Other
types of picnics that meet out there on a daily basis and a weekly basis for that that just go out there and just kind of take their chances and so really Lake Ann Park and Lake Susan Park are really extremely
popular with that and I think we re very lucky to have our wonderful picnic sites that we have Just you know an estimate of kind of what we keep track of on the reservations We had over 12 500 people
attached to those picnics that we made reservations for And then really above and beyond whether
people kind of are just out there having picnics with their family and friends or neighborhood parks so that number is higher than actually recorded here so And what we re trying to do as a department too is
take advantage of our park system with Lake Ann Adventure Camp Senior picnics through Sue Bill s
leadership The Miracle Kids Triathlon The middle school cross country meet on an annual basis You know the Tae Kwon Do Summer Sensations used Lake Susan here for the last couple years so we re
really trying to really get kids outdoors you know kind of outside the rec center Outside the park system to other I guess wonderful facilities that we do have and we also have the paddle board race in September
out at Lake Ann as well so that s a new event That was in September for that So as you can see on the
back of that the categories we did kind of break it down by category itself If it s a resident non resident and then kind of break that down to what day of the week that there were events going on You know
really just an example Lake Ann Park the pavilion there weren t that many days that there wasn t a
reservation either through our department or family picnics You know weddings That sort of thing so
Lake Ann was extremely popular this year and we feel very lucky for that And you saw a lot of the evaluations that did come back and we send those out you know within a couple days typically of the
conclusion of the picnic Send back their deposit checks that sort of thing and then really kind of solicit information or feedback from our groups You know what went good What didn t go good Are you
satisfied with the fee or with the procedure Were there too many bees which seems to be the
reoccurring problem at Lake Susan this year and I m surprised our park maintenance personnel are bee experts at this point I think we tried just about everything here but it just seemed like it was kind of one
of those years again no matter what we did it seemed to be reoccurring so So those are certainly type of
things that we see feedback on you know People are you know think that the bathrooms need repainting that sort of stuff so we just all gain feedback from that We talk about that on a staff level if there s times
that we have during the wintertime and we can get the work done we ll certainly address that at that point
and just kind of keeping it fresh for that so As you can see staff was extremely happy with the way the summer turned out with the number of reservations that we had and again we ll continue to take a look at
the feedback that we do get from the evaluations and just keep striving to increase that number and make sure that people have a quality experience
Daniel Thanks Thank you Jerry on this Peter Brent Questions for Jerry
Aldritt No
Carron None
Daniel Cole
Cole Kelly Anything that needs to be done at any of these sites to keep up you know other than the
painting you were talking about To keep up the good work that s going on there
Ruegemer Yeah a lot of it s just you know just for an example you know just kind of keep things fresh
Dean Schmieg our Park Foreman and seasonal staff did you know kind of take out a lot of the picnic
7
152
Park and Recreation Commission October 25 2011
tables out at the Hilltop shelter this year Kind of rotate some in and take them back to the park
maintenance shed and stain I think all of them were stained this summer so just those type of things
Keep graffiti off the tables Keep you know if there s gum on the concrete floor or you know for whatever reason you know tape on the pillars that sort of thing Just keep you know the shelters looking
presentable You know I mean I think people have that expectation I certainly do and our park staff
really take ownership of a lot of the buildings and facilities so it s just a matter of kind of keeping up with those type of things You know the Lake Ann pavilion You know the bathrooms and that down there
You know the concession stand could use a little freshening up with paint Potentially a floor at some point in time so we re investigating those type of things If it s not we re really trying to do things at a
not real big capital expense if we can do things over the wintertime with replacing tiles or you know
painting a little bit A lot of times you can get Sentence to Serve out there to paint exterior or interior bathrooms that sort of thing so we kind of keep looking at that It s nothing really structural at this point
or anything real high priced for you know to fix these type of things and park maintenance staff did get
the trail connected from the Lake Ann stairs to the Hilltop shelter That s done now We re in the process of planting some memorial trees and that sort of thing up in that area so we re just continuing to
kind of make those strides and continuing improvement
Cole Kelly So are most groups pretty good at clean up like you do return like 95 of the deposits or
what s that number
Ruegemer Probably even higher with that You know we really don t have problems with people you
know leaving excess garbage and that sort of thing for picnics People that rent our sites are extremely
conscientious A lot of times they obviously clean the tables up and a lot of times they will bring their own bags and bag up garbage and if there s extra garbage that go beyond the capacity of what we have
out there then we will then you know pick up all the bagged garbage in the morning We re out there 7 days a week out there so obviously some groups are bigger than others so a lot of times you know we
have one of the 4 yard dumpsters that we pull behind either a truck or a workman that a lot of times we do
fill so you know garbage is a big thing within our park system that we really take care of daily with that so but yeah people are very good about that They ask a lot of questions about what they can do with the
garbage and you know I think people still kind of have that fear that their deposit check won t get
returned and that has not been a problem
Cole Kelly Well good thank you You guys are doing a great job
Ruegemer Thanks
Daniel Tom
Tom Kelly One question Did you not do well at Lake Susan on Sunday or is that just an oddity that
there wasn t anything on Sunday
Ruegemer Kind of with Lake Susan is we have the Hispanic baseball league playing out there on
Sundays and you know kind of having two events of that size going on at the same time parking can be an issue with that so staff has chosen not to do any picnics on Sundays
Daniel Steve Elise
Ryan I just think you guys do a great job I spend a lot of time at the parks and picnic tables and areas in the summer with a lot of residents and non residents and I think because you do clean up and pick up and
keep it so well maintained that it draws families and people to host events there because they can count on
8
153
Park and Recreation Commission October 25 2011
that it s going to be you know a nice place to hold an event so you guys have just done a great job Really
appreciate that
Ruegemer Thank you
Daniel Steve
Scharfenberg Nothing
Daniel Yeah I mean actually the one question I had was the same Tom had asked about was Sunday so
that makes sense but I m glad to see there s certainly a pick up on the reservations and the opportunities and even more importantly if you look at the resident totals I mean you re looking over 60 of what we
have are just within residents so
Ruegemer We ll be bringing the picnic fees back in November too and talk about 2012 with that so just
to kind of put the bug in your ear at this point If there s anything that you d like to change If you want to get rid of a non resident fee and just go straight across or other type of things I guess whatever you d
like to discuss we can certainly can discuss at that point
Daniel Great thank you Jerry
CHANJAM 11 PREVIEW REPORT
Ruegemer Thanks again with that and I know many of the commissioners have been at ChanJam so do
does everybody pretty much know what ChanJam is at this point It s kind of a battle of the bands out at the event has been held out at the Chanhassen Recreation Center and really is just a showcase of all the
local high school musicians and bands from a number of different area schools that have kind of had that
opportunity to perform It s typically been in April of the year and just throughout the course of about the last couple years we ve kind of maybe kind of hit a little bit of a challenge attracting bands because of
you know spring break proms ACT tests A lot of the different things that are associated with
springtime and school so we really kind of had the discussion among the staff level of changing it to November of the year so that s what we re going to do We re going to try it to host the event now on th Friday November 18 and move it from spring to fall with the thought of really attracting and having
student s schedules a little bit more open to kind of dedicate this so this will be the Friday prior to Thanksgiving It seemed like just through research with staff it seemed like it was relatively a good time
to make that offering so instead of making you know kind of that big gap in time like an 18 month gap in time we re just going to do like I said the spring one and we re going to do the one here in November
here just to kind of keep that moving forward here so As you can see it started in 2008 With that we
had really kind of increasing numbers throughout the course of the ChanJam early on We kind of
plateaued a little bit here and went flat a little bit last year and that really was the consideration for making that change and just trying something different We don t want to get comfortable and just kind
of doing the same thing with that and if that means to kind of change it up a little bit and that really was
the reason for the change of venue as well So we ll be hosting the event at the new Chanhassen High School auditorium versus at the Chanhassen Recreation Center so we thought maybe a new venue might
kind of make it kind of fun too I m not sure how that s going to work for the other high schools but I think it ll be fine You have the new auditorium is a wonderful performance area and we ll see
logistically how it all works Obviously we ll save a little bit of money if we don t have to get staging
and a lot of those types of equipment with that so we re excited about making that making the change and you know information s already out there John s made a lot of contacts out with all the high schools
again Posters and information is all out to the high schools itself and currently we have one band signed
up which is not odd No reason to panic at this point You know we do a lot of times the kids will sign
9
154
Park and Recreation Commission October 25 2011
up within probably 2 weeks 3 weeks of the event so we re kind of coming up to that area now so Eric
Sanger has helped out tremendously with that I mean he s with Chaska High School He used to be kind
of the person instrumental for having that battle of the bands down there and I think really at this point I think within the last 2 or 3 years he thought let s just join forces and kind of work together on this and
he s been a great asset We re going to have McNally Smith involved again with that with kind of
donating studio time for the winners of the area MacPhail will be doing certificates for guitar camps and that sort of thing so we re going to have a lot of prize packs From School of Rock Shell Lake Arts and
Blizzard Ski School of all things just wanted to get involved with teen programming so everybody s going to be bringing you know kind of something different to give away from prizes to scholarships to
tickets lessons air time a lot of those type of things so it s been a great partnership with a lot of these
The kids are thrilled to have air time or not air time but studio time They can go in to record and that sort of thing It s been a great experience for them It s been a great experience for and learning
experience really for McNally Smith because of lot are young kids that are trying to kind of get into the
business of recording and that sort of thing so it s good practice for all them so it s been working out great for everybody And again I know that was important for probably the Park and Rec Commission to
try and partner up with food shelf items We re going to be doing that again If you bring a food shelf item we ll take a dollar off the admission fee for that again and then donate that to the local CAP Agency
so we re excited about that and it seems to be hopefully there s going to be a lot of interest in that and get
a lot of these bands that we ve had a number of great bands you know throughout the last 3 4 years that come out of the ChanJam and it s been great It s been a great experience for us and hopefully good
experience for the kids of our community
Daniel Okay great Jerry thank you Questions for Jerry
Scharfenberg Is the recreation or not recreation but the food area at the school are they going to open that up for you guys
Ruegemer You know what we ll be kind of concentrated to that to the performing area itself I ll need to check on that John made the reservation for the high school and we can check on that and get back to
you
Scharfenberg Because I know you guys have had you know Culver s before You ve had some food
there and I don t know if they would be if the school would be interested in opening up their thing for
that They might make some money that way
Ruegemer Sure You bet
Daniel Elise
Ryan No I don t
Daniel Tom
Tom Kelly Nope
Cole Kelly In reference to Steve s comment if you re interested in food I d contact the Booster Club
That might be the place to start I think you made great changes and I m glad to see that s just a terrific
auditorium so I think the event will be highly successful I m also aware if you want the area that s the lunchroom
Ruegemer The commons
10
155
Park and Recreation Commission October 25 2011
Cole Kelly The commons area you ve got to reserve that separately so make sure John s aware of that
Ruegemer Okay Yeah we ll take a look at that
Daniel Thank you Cole Brent Peter
Carron I m good Sounds good
Aldritt Is there any talk about having like an emcee someone like the Dave Ryan was in 2009 somebody
was
Ruegemer Right Yeah that s a we re going to continue to work on that At this point you know Dave
Ryan was kind of a one year deal We did ask him in the past and he s had kind of scheduling conflicts but we ll continue to kind of work on that as well
Daniel Well great Well certainly encouraging any commissioners to attend if they re available on the thth Friday the 17 right 18
th Ruegemer Yep 18
th Daniel Friday the 18 Okay So with that well good luck and hopefully we ll have 5 6 7 bands
Ruegemer Oh we ll get the bands
Daniel Good excellent Well thank you Jerry
COMMISSION MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS None
COMMISSION MEMBER PRESENTATIONS None
ADMINISTRATIVE PACKET None
OLD BUSINESS
Cole Kelly When I was reading through the minutes Jerry I just had an idea I was reading about the boats and the kayaks how they didn t do well this year and I was thinking maybe what we should do next
year and this is just an idea for you guys to kick around is in May and June you know we can advertise th on the website to have a discount on the kayaks and then put on there you better reserve early for the 4
or something like that Just a thought Comment
Ruegemer Okay thank you
Daniel Okay motion to adjourn
Carron moved Scharfenberg seconded to adjourn the meeting All voted in favor and the motion
carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0 The Park and Recreation Commission meeting was
adjourned at 8 05 p m
Submitted by Todd Hoffman
Park and Rec Director Prepared by Nann Opheim
11
156
0
CITE OF
CgANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
7901 Park Place
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
Ic
IX uo u
TO
FROM
DATE
SUBJ
Todd Gerhardt City Manager
Paul Oehme Director of Public Works City Engineer
November 28 2011 V
Approve Agreement with MnDOT for Federal Participation in
Construction Projects
PROPOSED MOTION
The City Council approves agreement with MnDOT to act as City s agent for
federal funded projects
City Council approval requires a simple majority vote of the City Council
present
BACKGROUND
The City of Chanhassen has been awarded federal funds for several transportation
projects They include safety improvements on TH 5 from Lone Cedar Lane to
Minnewashta Parkway and a trail underpass at Minnewashta Parkway and TH 5
MnDOT is planning to include these projects into the TH 5 roadway project
planned for construction start in 2012 MnDOT is designing this project at no
cost to the City and will be bidding and handling the construction administration
services The agreement identifies the City representative for the project bidding
requirements construction administration and payment requirements along with
other miscellaneous duties This is the general agreement MnDOT has
communities sign for MnDOT to include other agency s federal funded project
into their projects and contracts In order for MnDOT to bid out the project
handle the construction administration services and request the federal funds
when needed to pay the contractor MnDOT needs the authority from the City to
take over the administration of the federal project This agreement gives MnDOT
the authority to act as the agent of the City for the federal projects on TH 5 The
City will still need to approve the bids and authorize the expenditures of funds
before the construction can start
The City attorney has reviewed the agreement and finds it in order
Attachments Resolution
MnDOT Agreement No 99945
gA eng Ag MW9j AP WUpjtkJ 1 pPd t rgfg1T44YcgndPlanningforTomorrow 157
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES MINNESOTA
DATE November 28 2011 RESOLUTION NO 2011
MOTION BY SECONDED BY
A RESOLUTION APPROVING MnDOT AGREEMENT NO 99945
FOR FEDERAL PARTICIPATION IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council
1 That pursuant to Minnesota Stat Sec 161 36 the Commissioner of Transportation be
appointed as Agent of the City of Chanhassen to accept as its agent federal aid fund which
may be made available for eligible transportation related projects
2 The mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed for and on behalf of the City to execute
and enter into an agreement with the Commissioner of Transportation prescribing the terms
and conditions of said federal aid participation as set forth and contained in Minnesota
Department of Transportation Agency Agreement No 99945 a copy of which said agreement
was before the City Council and which is made a part hereof by reference
Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 28 day of November 2011
ATTEST
Todd Gerhardt City Manager Thomas A Furlong Mayor
YES NO ABSENT
158
MnDOT Agreement No 99945
STATE OF MINNESOTA AGENCY AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND
THE CITY OF CHANHAUSSEN
FOR FEDERAL PARTICIPATION IN CONSTRUCTION
This agreement is entered into by and between the City of Chanhassen and the State of
Minnesota acting through its Commissioner of Transportation MnDOT
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 161 36 the City desires MnDOT to act as the
City agent in accepting federal funds on the City behalf for the construction
improvement or enhancement of transportation financed either in whole or in part by
federal funds hereinafter referred to as the Project s and
This agreement is intended to cover all federal aid projects initiated by the City and
therefore has not specific State Project number tied to it and
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number or CFDA number is 20 205 and
This agreement supersedes agreement number 97986 and
MnDOT requires that the terms and conditions of this agency be set forth in an
agreement
THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS
I DUTIES OF THE CITY
A DESIGNATION The City designates MnDOT to act as its agent in accepting
federal funds in its behalf made available for the Project s Details on the
required processes and procedures are available on the State Aid Website
B STAFFING
1 The City will furnish and assign a publicly employed licensed engineer
Project Engineer to be in responsible charge of the Project s and to
supervise and direct the work to be performed under any construction
contract let forthe Project s 1n alternative wh ere th C ity elects to use a
private consultant for construction engineering services the City will provide
a qualified full time public employee of the City to be in responsible charge
of the Project s The services of the City to be performed hereunder may not
be assigned sublet or transferred unless the City is notified in writing by
MnDOT that such action is permitted under 23 CFR 1 33 and 23 CFR
635 105 and state law This written consent will in no way relieve the City
MnDOT Agreement No 99945
Page I
159
from its primary responsibility for performance of the work
2 During the progress of the work on the Project s the City authorizes its Project Engineer to request in writing specific engineering and or technical services from MnDOT pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 161 39 Such
services may be covered by other technical service agreements If MnDOT furnishes the services requested and if MnDOT requests reimbursement then the City will promptly pay MnDOT to reimburse the state trunk highway fund for the full cost and expense of furnishing such services The costs and
expenses will include the current MnDOT labor additives and overhead rates subject to adjustment based on actual direct costs that have been verified by audit Provision of such services will not be deemed to make MnDOT a
principal or co principal with respect to the Project s
C LETTING The City will prepare construction contracts in accordance with Minnesota law and applicable Federal laws and regulations
1 The City will solicit bids after obtaining written notification from MnDOT that the Federal Highway Administration FHWA has authorized the Project s Any Project s advertised prior to authorization will not be eligible for federal reimbursement
2 The City will prepare the Proposal for Highway Construction for the
construction contract which will include all of the federal aid provisions supplied by MnDOT
The City will prepare and publish the bid solicitation for the Project s as required by state and federal laws The City will include in the solicitation the
required language for federal aid construction contracts as supplied by MnDOT The solicitation will state where the proposals plans and specifications are available for the inspection of prospective bidders and where the City will receive the sealed bids
4 The City may not include other work in the construction contract for the authorized Project s without obtaining prior notification from MnDOT that
such work is allowed by FHWA Failure to obtain such notification may result in the loss of some or all of the federal funds for the Project s
5 The City will prepare and sell the plan and proposal packages and prepare and distribute any addendums if needed
6 The City will receive and open bids
7 After the bids are opened the City Council will consider the bids and will
award the bid to the lowest responsible bidder or reject all bids If the construction contract contains a goal for Disadvantaged Business
Enterprises the City will not award the bid until it has received certification of
the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise participation from the MnDOT Equal Employment Opportunity Office
D CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
Page 2
MnDOT Agreement No 99945
160
The City will prepare and execute a construction contract with the lowest
responsible bidder hereinafter referred to as the Contractor in
accordance with the special provisions and the latest edition of MnDOT s
Standard Specifications for Construction and all amendments thereto
2 The Project s will be constructed in accordance with plans special provisions and standard specifications of each Project The standard
specifications will be the latest edition of MnDOT Standard Specifications
for Highway Construction and all amendments thereto The plans special provisions and standard specifications will be on file at the City Engineer s Office The plans special provisions and specifications are incorporated into this agreement by reference as though fully set forth herein
3 The City will furnish the personnel services supplies and equipment necessary to properly supervise inspect and document the work for the
Project s The services of the City to be performed hereunder may not be assigned sublet or transferred unless the City is notified in writing by MnDOT that such action is permitted under 23 CFR 1 33 and 23 CFR
635 105 and state law This written consent will in no way relieve the City from its primary responsibility for performance of the work
4 The City will document quantities in accordance with the guidelines set forth
in the Construction Section of the Electronic State Aid Manual that were in
effect at the time the work was performed
5 The City will test materials in accordance with the Schedule of Materials Control in effect at the time each Project was let The City will notify MnDOT when work is in progress on the Project s that requires observation by the Independent Assurance Inspector as required by the Independent Assurance Schedule
6 The City may make changes in the plans or the character of the work as may be necessary to complete the Project s and may enter into
supplemental agreement s with the Contractor The City will not be reimbursed for any costs of any work performed under a supplemental agreement unless MnDOT has notified the City that the subject work is
eligible for federal funds and sufficient federal funds are available
7 The City will request approval from MnDOT for all costs in excess of the
amount of federal funds previously approved for the Project s prior to
incurring such costs Failure to obtain such approval may result in such costs being disallowed for reimbursement
8 The City will prepare reports keep records and perform work so as to
enable MnDOT to collect the federal aid sought by the City Required reports are listed in the MnDOT State Aid Manual Delegated Contract
Process Checklist available from MnDOT s authorized representative The
City will retain all records and reports in accordance with MnDOT s record
retention schedule for federal aid projects
9 Upon completion of the Project s the Project Engineer will determine
whether the work will be accepted
MnDOT Agreement No 99945
Page 3 161
E PAYMENTS
The entire cost of the Project s is to be paid from federal funds made
available by the FHWA and by other funds provided by the City The City will
pay any part of the cost or expense of the Project s that is not paid by
federal funds
2 The City will prepare partial estimates in accordance with the terms of the
construction contract for the Project s The Project Engineer will certify each
partial estimate Following certification of the partial estimate the City will
make partial payments to the Contractor in accordance with the terms of the
construction contract for the Project s
3 Following certification of the partial estimate the City may request
reimbursement for costs eligible for federal funds The City s request will be
made to MnDOT and will include a copy of the certified partial estimate
4 Upon completion of the Project s the City will prepare a final estimate in
accordance with the terms of the construction contract for the Project s The
Project Engineer will certify the final estimate Following certification of the
final estimate the City will make the final payment to the Contractor in
accordance with the terms of the construction contract for the Project s
5 Following certification of the final estimate the City may request
reimbursement for costs eligible for federal funds The City s request will be
made to MnDOT and will include a copy of the certified final estimate along
with the required records
F LIMITATIONS
1 The City will comply with all applicable Federal State and local laws
ordinances and regulations
2 Nondiscrimination It is the policy of the Federal Highway Administration and
the State of Minnesota that no person in the United States will on the
grounds of race color or national origin be excluded from participation in be
denied the benefits of or be subjected to discrimination under any program or
activity receiving Federal financial assistance 42 U S C 2000d Through
expansion of the mandate for nondiscrimination in Title VI and through
parallel legislation the proscribed bases of discrimination include race color
sex national origin age and disability In addition the Title VI program has
been extended to cover all programs activities and services of an entity
receiving Federal financial assistance whether such programs and activities
are Federally assisted or not Even in the absence of prior discriminatory
practice or usage a recipient in administering a program or activity to which
this part applies is expected to take affirmative action to assure that no
person is excluded from participation in or is denied the benefits of the
program or activity on the grounds of race color national origin sex age or disability It is the responsibility of the City to carry out the above
requirements
MnDOT Agreement No 99945
Page 4 162
3 Workers Compensation Any and all employees of the City or other persons
while engaged in the performance of any work or services required or
permitted by the City under this agreement will not be considered employees
of MnDOT and any and all claims that may arise under the Workers
Compensation Act of Minnesota on behalf of said employees or other
persons while so engaged will in no way be the obligation or responsibility of
MnDOT The City will require proof of Workers Compensation Insurance
from any contractor and sub contractor
4 Utilities The City will treat all public private or cooperatively owned utility
facilities which directly or indirectly serve the public and which occupy
highway rights of way in conformance with 23 CFR 645 Utilities which is
incorporated herein by reference
G AUDIT
The City will comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Office of
Management and Budget OMB circular A 133 which are incorporated
herein by reference
2 As provided under Minnesota Statutes Section 16C 05 subdivision 5 all
books records documents and accounting procedures and practices of the
City are subject to examination by the United States Government MnDOT
and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor as appropriate for a
minimum of seven years The City will be responsible for any costs
associated with the performance of the audit
H MAINTENANCE The City assumes full responsibility for the operation and
maintenance of any facility constructed or improved under this Agreement
CLAIMS The City acknowledges that MnDOT is acting only as the City s agent
for acceptance and disbursement of federal funds and not as a principal or co
principal with respect to the Project The City will pay any and all lawful claims
arising out of or incidental to the Project including without limitation claims
related to contractor selection including the solicitation evaluation and
acceptance or rejection of bids or proposals acts or omissions in performing the
Project work and any ultra vires acts The City will indemnify defend to the
extent permitted by the Minnesota Attorney General and hold MnDOT
harmless from any claims or costs arising out of or incidental to the Project s
including reasonable attorney fees incurred by MnDOT The City s
indemnification obligation extends to any actions related to the certification of
DBE participation even if such actions are recommended by MnDOT
Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act FFATA This Agreement requires the City to provide supplies and or services that are funded in whole or in
part by federal funds that are subject to FFATA The City is responsible for
ensuring that all applicable requirements including but not limited to those set
forth herein of FFATA are met and that the City provides information to the
MnDOT as required
1 Reporting of Total Compensation of the City s Executives
MnDOT Agreement No 99945
Page 5 163
a The City shall report the names and total compensation of each of its five most highly compensated executives for the City s preceding completed fiscal year if in the City s preceding fiscal year it received
i 80 percent or more of the City s annual gross revenues from Federal procurement contracts and Federal financial assistance subject to the Transparency Act as defined at 2 CFR 170 320 and subawards and ii 25 000 000 or more in annual gross revenues from Federal procurement contracts and subcontracts and Federal financial assistance subject to the Transparency Act and subawards and
The public does not have access to information about the compensation of the executives through periodic reports filed under section 13 a or 15 d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U S C 78m a 78o d or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 To determine if the public has access to the compensation information see the U S Security and Exchange Commission total compensation filings at h ttp www sec goy answers execomp htm
Executive means officers managing partners or any other employees in management positions
b Total compensation means the cash and noncash dollar value earned by the executive during the City s preceding fiscal year and includes the following for more information see 17 CFR 229 402 c 2
Salary and bonus
ii Awards of stock stock options and stock appreciation rights Use the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to the fiscal year in accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No 123 Revised 2004 FAS 123R Shared Based Payments
Earnings for services under non equity incentive plans This does not include group life health hospitalization or medical reimbursement plans that do not discriminate in favor of executives and are available generally to all salaried employees iv Change in pension value This is the change in present value of defined benefit and actuarial pension plans V Above market earnings on deferred compensation which is not tax qualified vi Other compensation if the aggregate value of all such other compensation e g severance termination
payments value of life insurance paid on behalf of the employee perquisites or property for the executive exceeds 10 000
Page 6 MnDOT Agreement No 99945
164
2 The City must report executive total compensation described above to the
MnDOT by the end of the month during which this agreement is awarded
The City will obtain a Data Universal Numbering System DUNS number
and maintain its DUNS number for the term of this agreement This
number shall be provided to MnDOT on the plan review checklist submitted with the plans for each project More information about obtaining a DUNS Number can be found at http fedgov dnb com webform
4 The City s failure to comply with the above requirements is a material
breach of this agreement for which the MnDOT may terminate this
agreement for cause The MnDOT will not be obligated to pay any outstanding invoice received from the City unless and until the City is in full compliance with the above requirements
II DUTIES OF MnDOT
A ACCEPTANCE MnDOT accepts designation as Agent of the City for the receipt and disbursement of federal funds and will act in accordance herewith
B PROJECT ACTIVITIES
1 MnDOT will make the necessary requests to the FHWA for authorization to
use federal funds for the Project s and for reimbursement of eligible costs pursuant to the terms of this agreement
2 MnDOT will provide to the City copies of the required Federal aid clauses to
be included in the bid solicitation and will provide the required Federal aid provisions to be included in the Proposal for Highway Construction
3 MnDOT will review and certify the DBE participation and notify the City when certification is complete If certification of DBE participation or good faith efforts to achieve such participation cannot be obtained then City must decide whether to proceed with awarding the contract Failure to
obtain such certification will result in the project becoming ineligible for federal assistance and the City must make up any shortfall
4 MnDOT will provide the required labor postings
C PAYMENTS
1 MnDOT will receive the federal funds to be paid by the FHWA for the Project s pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 161 36 Subdivision 2
2 MnDOT will reimburse the City from said federal funds made available to
each Project for each partial payment request subject to the availability and limits of those funds
3 Upon completion of the Project s MnDOT will perform a final inspection and verify the federal and state eligibility of all the payment requests If the Project is found to have been completed in accordance with the plans and
MnDOT Agreement No 99945 Page 7
165
specifications MnDOT will promptly release any remaining federal funds due the City for the Project s
4 In the event MnDOT does not obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature or other funding source or funding cannot be continued at a sufficient level to
allow for the processing of the federal aid reimbursement requests the City may continue the work with local funds only until such time as MnDOT is
able to process the federal aid reimbursement requests
D AUTHORITY MnDOT may withhold federal funds where MnDOT or the FHWA
determines that the Project s was not completed in compliance with federal
requirements
E INSPECTION MnDOT the FHWA or duly authorized representatives of the state and federal government will have the right to audit evaluate and monitor the work performed under this agreement The City will make available all books records and documents pertaining to the work hereunder for a minimum of
seven years following the closing of the construction contract
III TORT LIABILITY Each party is responsible for its own acts and omissions and the results thereof to the extent authorized by taw and will not be responsible for the acts and omissions of any others and the results thereof The Minnesota Tort Claims Act Minnesota Statutes Section 3 736 governs MnDOT liability
IV ASSIGNMENT Neither party will assign or transfer any rights or obligations under this agreement without prior written approval of the other party
V AMENDMENTS Any amendments supplements to this Agreement will be in writing and executed by the same parties who executed the original agreement or their successors in office
VI AGREEMENT EFFECTIVE DATE This agreement is effective upon execution by the appropriate State officials pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 16C 05
VII CANCELLATION This agreement may be canceled by the City or MnDOT at any time with or without cause upon ninety 90 days written notice to the other party Such termination will not remove any unfulfilled financial obligations of the City as set forth in this Agreement In the event of such a cancellation the City will be entitled to reimbursement for MnDOT approved federally eligible expenses incurred for work satisfactorily performed on the Project to the date of cancellation subject to the terms of this agreement
VIII DATA PRACTICES ACT The parties will comply with the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act Minnesota Statutes chapter 13 as it applies to all data gathered collected created or disseminated related to this Agreement
Remainder of this page left intentionally blank
MnDOT Agreement No 99945 Page 8
166
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed intending to be bound thereby
CITY OF CHANHAUSSEN 2 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
City certifies that the appropriate person s
have executed the contract on behalf of the
City as required by applicable articles By
bylaws resolutions or ordinances
Title
Date
Title
Date
Title Director
State Aid for Local Transportation
Date
3 COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION
in
Date
MnDOT Agreement No 99945
Page 9 167
0
CITY OF
CAANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
7901 Park Place
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
MEMORANDUM
TO Todd Gerhardt City Manager
FROM Jill Sinclair Environmental Resources Specialist
DATE November 28 2011
SUBJ 2011 Environmental Excellence Awards
PROPOSED MOTION
The Chanhassen City Council approves the following nominees for 2011
Environmental Excellence Awards to be presented at the December 12 2011
City Council Meeting
Lakewinds Natural Foods
The Lotus Lake Clean Water Organization
Approval requires a majority vote of the City Council
DISCUSSION
The Environmental Excellence Awards are given by the City of Chanhassen to
recognize environmental improvements and encourage environmental stewardship
throughout the community These awards are designed not only to recognize
achievement but also to communicate ideas and help educate members of the
Chanhassen community For 2011 two nominees have been recommended by the
Environmental Commission
Lakewinds Natural Foods submitted an application that details their efforts to
create a sustainable workplace The store has reduced energy costs through
lighting and appliance selections reduced waste by increasing recycling and
reusing materials selected cleaning and improvement products that have low to
no environmental impacts and offered recycling services to customers The store
has also created an internal committee to address ongoing strategies for
environmental improvements
The Lotus Lake Clean Water Organization is a group of Chanhassen residents
committed to educating the community on water quality issues The most
important and current issue for the group is zebra mussels To educate themselves
in order to pass on the information to the public the group organized DNR
Chanhassen is a Community for Life Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 168
Todd Gerhardt
2010 Environmental Excellence Awards
November 22 2010
Page 2 of 2
sessions was then passed on to the public through education offered at the South
Lotus Lake boat ramp public meetings at the Chanhassen library and city hall
numerous newspaper articles and a community forum with a DNR employee as
the guest speaker The organization has worked hard to increase public awareness
and education of the zebra mussel issue
The award presentation is scheduled for the December 12 City Council meeting
gAplan js ec projects ee award ee award memo 1 Ldoc
169
ENVIRONMENTAL EXCELLENCE A WARD
APPLICA TION FORM
Application headline is October 31 2011
Name
Address or Location of Entry iw V se r A joklyl l i fIL
Contact Person 6 h e i
Address t i i AAA 0 M I 6 5 3
Phone Number G 1 2 70 i c l tJi
Category
1
If in Category 8 Ji l business name
certifies that it is in compliance with all city state and federal regulations
Activity Description
Additional narratives photos or other formats to describe project are encouraged All
documentation will be returned upon request
Release of Information
The City of Chanhassen and the Chanhassen Chamber of Commerce reserve the right to use winning
entries for promotional purposes through newspaper articles tours or other means I agree to
allow the city to publish my address name and description of project This release is only valid for
winning entries Z
Signature RECEIVED
OCT 3 1 201
170
Environmental Excellence Award
Lakewinds is a growing natural foods co op located in Chanhassen and Minnetonka
Minnesota One of our core missions is to promote sustainable practices within and
without the store Over the past several years several initiatives have been enacted
which will be detailed below
Building
Our earliest endeavor was changing all of our lights from 35 watts to 28 watts reducing
energy waste Including within this project was the installation of sensor switches in our
bathrooms and break room minimizing energy waste by shutting off lights while the
rooms are not in use
At our Chanhassen location we ve started using Organics Disposal LLC in conjunction
with our on site recycling program By employing this company we ve reduced landfill
waste by 66 It s a storewide program that has channeled waste from what would have
gone to landfills to composting and made into fresh usable soil Waste Technology has
provided support in the recycling of glass aluminum and plastic containers
Our efforts to reduce paper waste include extensive cardboard recycling and 100 post
consumer paper products We recycle nearly three tons of cardboard a month and all
waxed cardboard waste is composted through Organic Disposal LLC
Recent renovations of the store were conducted with sustainability and recyclability in
mind No or low VOC Volatile Organic Compound paints were used during the
remodeling project and any extraneous waste was recycled through a local construction
recycling company Old fixtures and shelving have instead of disposed have been sold
back to the suppliers for reuse
Solar window film has been applied to our Chanhassen store windows to reduce
overheating within the store and to regulate the overall temperature This has allowed
our coolers to operate efficiently minimizing energy waste
Cleaning supplies used throughout the store are all natural containing essential oils and
extracts found within plant life These supplies are either made on site or purchased from
a sustainable local company Restore the Earth
As a service to our customers we offer battery cell phone eyeglass inkjet cartridge and
plastic bag recycling located within the store We also encourage customers to conduct
personal sustainability practices by bringing their own bags when they shop for their
purchases
171
Department
Each department is equipped with their own compost and recycling containers Our Deli
department has been our biggest change by converting to compostable eating utensils and
dishware for our to go customers To reduce in house waste we ve gotten rid of plastic
and moved to real forks spoons plates and bowls which are washed on site in a highly
efficient dishwasher
Each department is encouraged to work with their vendors in reducing packaging which
is not recyclable Included within this venture is the recycling of packing peanuts bubble
wrap and plastic overwrap to local sources
With our general merchandise a strong emphasis is placed on providing items which
support our sustainability mission This includes items that are made from post consumer
materials biodegradable items and packaging and renewable resources such as bamboo
We were the first in the nation to employ the use of tapioca shopping bags These
products are 100 compostable and biodegradable and produced from renewable
sources
When produce isn t pristine but still useable we channel it to other departments who
may benefit from the product instead of creating more waste This practice has saved
money delivery costs and in the long run fuel waste Our second grade bananas for
example are used in the Deli for smoothies and baked goods
Individual
A committee has been established to promote our commitment to sustainability called
the Green Team This group focuses on issues related to reducing waste within the
store staying up to date on new practices and merchandising that would promote
sustainability
We also conduct training on safety and waste management for each new employee This
details our compost and recycling program and elaborates on what can be recycled or
composted We take this time to inform each new employee that their initiative in this
matter goes a long way in providing a better Earth for everyone
Our Green Team mission statement
Lakewinds encourages policies and practices that reduce our impact on the environment
FVe embody the compassion to exceed our goals in waste reduction energy efficiency
and community education Being Green requires a cooperative commitment to achieve
beneficial results for our planet s wellbeing
172
Our compostable to go containers
along with real plates for a great
meal
Recycled materials that has been
turned back into consumer based
products
Center picture A Load of materials
that will be made into potting soil
One of the collection containers
that is used for colleting bubble
wrap and packing peanuts which go
back into the community to be re
used
This container below is the plastic
wrap that goes around pallets and
case pack food items We bag this
up and then a company comes and
picks it up from us
173
ENVIRONMENTAL EXCELLENCE A WAJECEIVED
A MMA TrON FORM OCT 3 1 2011
Application Deadline is October 31 2011 CITY OF CHANHASSEN
Name Tkt Lo s La 0 envi vva
Address or Location of Entry L 0 U S LA U
Contact Person SJ V Do o V1 4 es deyrr 6 JW Lj Wo
Address L4 I i l i t v V e4 r A yx Ka
Phone Number
Category T
t tA CWdsk
If in Category B business name
certifies that it is in compliance with all city state and federal regulations
Activity Description
Additional narratives photos or other formats to describe project are encouraged All
documentation will be returned upon request
Release of Information
The City of Chanhassen and the Chanhassen Chamber of Commerce reserve the right to use winning
entries for promotional purposes through newspaper articles tours or other means I agree to
allow the city to publish my address name and description of project This release is only valid f or
winning entries
Signature tvc bovu l ou o tmuy
coAzt acrf
174
2011 Accomplishments
Sponsored five separate DNR Training sessions to educate a total of 61 Volunteers to work at the
South Lotus Lake Park boat ramp this summer
Worked nearly 700 hours at the Lotus Lake boat ramp performing boat inspections and educating
boaters about AIS
Inspected 917 boats many of which were arriving from infested waters and many of which had
hull plugs in place and or water on board Water on boats trailers live wells etc is the primary
means of AIS spread
Maintained the Lotus Lake Clean Water Organization website
o htp 3 tusiake lean r cor
Fleld four public informational meetings at the Chanhassen Public Library to update the
community about the threat of AIS
Held several meetings with City leaders to inform them about AIS issues
Presented before the Parks Recreation Commission concerning AIS and Lotus Lake
Be ld an informational open forum with the City Council on October 29 where the DNR
discussed AIS and we discussed our plans to keep AIS out of Lotus Lake
2011 Findings
Of the 917 boats that were inspected at Lotus Lake we found
138 boats 15 were coming from infested waters
a 54 hashing boats 38
0 50 runabouts 35
0 23 ski boats 17
0 7 jet skis 5
0 2 kayaks 2
0 2 canoes 2
122 13 of boats were arriving with hull plugs in place and or water on board
175
2011 Press Coverage
http www chanvillager com viewffull s t o r
instancc article results
enconvview full story 1 645686 article Zebra m LIS atch http 11
lit tp chanyi I lager coni vicw f ful I storv ections the
htqi stL r
mussels
http w ww chaii iiia et coni t viexA I tilI sLorv 489 ailicle l etter Wli it aboLit yreater tiood
r
176
4
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
7901 Park Place
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
MEMORANDUM
TO Mayor and City Council
FROM Greg Sticha Finance Director
DATE November 17 2011
SUBJ Certification of Water and Sewer Hook Up Charges
BACKGROUND
City code allows for water and sewer hook up charges to be assessed to the
property taxes rather than paying them up front with the building permit fees
Repayment of the assessments occur over four years at an 8 interest rate The
following property owners have asked that their hook up charges be assessed to
their property taxes 1 79 Street Center Partnership LLP 7 419 00
530 West 79 St Suite 120 25 2750010
2 Steven G Pullen and Teri L Pullen 7 419 00
2383 Highover Trail 25 4170080
3 Stonefield Homes Inc 7 419 00
8711 Osprey Lane 25 7540030
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution authorizing the certification of the hook up charges for 79 Street Center Partnership LLP Steven G Pullen
and Teri L Pullen and Stonefield Homes Inc to Carver County
ATTACHMENT
1 Resolution authorizing certification of hook up charges to property taxes
2 Special Assessment Agreements
F dwashbum Special Assessments 2011 Memo Hook Ups doc
Chanhassen is a Community for Life Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow
1C
177
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION
DATE November 28 2011 RESOLUTION NO 2011
MOTION BY SECONDED BY
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CERTIFICATION OF
HOOK UP CHARGES TO PROPERTY TAXES
WHEREAS the City has entered into Special Assessment Agreements with 1 79 Street
Center Partnership LLP dated December 23 2010 2 Steven G Pullen and Teri L Pullen dated
October 19 2011 and 3 Stonefield Homes Inc dated May 5 2011 copies of which are attached hereto
as Exhibit A
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen
Minnesota
1 The Assessment Agreements are hereby approved The Mayor and City Manager are
authorized and directed to sign the Agreements
2 Such proposed assessments are hereby levied and shall constitute special assessments
against the lands named therein
3 Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period
of four 4 years the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2012 and shall bear interest at the rate of 8 percent 8 per annum starting January 1 2012 This assessment will show up on the first property tax statement for
2012 To each installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments
4 The property owner may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the
County pay the whole of the assessment on such property to the City except that no
interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid prior to certification of the
assessment The owner may at any time thereafter pay the City the entire amount of the
assessment remaining unpaid with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which
the payment is made Such payment must be made before November 30 or interest will
be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year The right to partially
prepay the assessment is not available
5 The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of the assessments to the County
to be extended on the proper tax lists of the County and such assessments shall be
collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes
178
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 28th day of November 2011
ATTEST
Todd Gerhardt City Manager Thomas A Furlong Mayor
YES NO ABSENT
179
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this J day of 2010 by and between the
CITY OF CHANHASSEN a Minnesota municipal corporation City and 79 STREET
CENTER PARTNERSHIP LLP a Minnesota limited liability partnership a k a 79 STREET
CENTER PARTNERSHIP the Property Owner
RECITALS
A Property Owner is the fee owner of certain property in the City of Chanhassen Carver County Minnesota legally described as
Lot 3 Block 1 Frontier Development Parr
having a street address of 530 West 79 Street Suite 120 Chanhassen Minnesota and a property identification number of 25 2750010 the Subject Property
B Property Owner has requested that the City specially assess hook up charges for water of 5 393 00 and sewer of 2 026 00 against the Subject Property
NOW THEREFORE IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS
THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS
1 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT The City hereby assesses the cost of the hook up charges for water of 5 393 00 and for sewer of 2 026 00 totaling 7 419 00 against the Subject Property The assessment shall be spread over four 4 years together with eight percent 8 00 interest per year on the unpaid balance Interest shall accrue from the date of the approval of this Agreement by the City Council The first installment shall be due and payable with taxes in 2012
The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessment including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment
exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn Stat 429 081 If the special assessment is not timely paid or is set aside for any reason then instead of paying the special assessment the Property Owner shall pay the City on demand an amount equivalent to the unpaid special assessment together with any legal fees the City may incur
180
PROPERTY OWNER
79 STREET CENTER PARTNERSHIP
LLP
By
s
By A
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA
SS
COUNTY OF
The fore oing instrument as ac ow edged before me this day of 2 e 2010 by 1 and by the
and mac of 79 Street Center Partnership LLP a Minnesota limited liability partnership a k a 79 Street Center Partnership on behalf of the partnership the Property Owner
NOTAWY PU11LIC
CAROL M DUNSMORE
ta Notary Public Minneso 20 Coin mis9bn Eyo es Jan 31 20
DRAFTED BY
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Chive
Eagan Minnesota 55121
Telephone 612 452 5000
RNK
181
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this Iq day of b jk br 2011 by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN a Minnesota municipal corporation City and Steven G Pullen and
Teri L Pullen the Property Owner
RECITALS
A Property Owner is the fee owner of certain property in the City of Chanhassen Carver County Minnesota legally described as
Lot 8 Block 1 Lake Harrison
having a street address of 2383 Highover Trail Chanhassen Minnesota and a property identification number of 25 4170080 the Subject Property
B Property Owner has requested that the City specially assess hook up charges for water of 5 393 00 and sewer of 2 026 00 against the Subject Property
NOW THEREFORE IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS
THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS
1 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT The City hereby assesses the cost of the hook up charges for water of 5 393 00 and for sewer of 2 026 00 totaling 7 419 00 against the Subject Property The assessment shall be spread over four 4 years together with eight percent 8 00 interest per year on the unpaid balance Interest shall accrue from the date of the approval of this Agreement by the City Council The first installment shall be due and payable with taxes in 2012 The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessment including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn Stat 429 081 If the special assessment is not timely paid or is set aside for any reason then instead of paying the special assessment the Property Owner shall pay the City on demand an amount equivalent to the unpaid special assessment together with any legal fees the City may incur
182
PROPERTY OWNER
Steven G Pullen and
Teri L Pullen
By
By
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss
COUNTY OF
The fore oing instname was acknowledged before me this 19 d day of Q 2011 by P and by c 6 the property
owners of 2383 Highover Trail Lot 8 Block 1 Lake Harrison 25 4170080
NOTAR LIC
f CAROL M DUNSMORE
Notary Public Minnesota
i My Commission Expires Jan 31 2015
DRAFTED BY
CAMPBELL KNUTsoN
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan Minnesota 55121
Telephone 612 452 5000
RNK
183
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this 5 day of R Cr 2011 by and between the
CITY OF CHANHASSEN a Minnesota municipal corporation City and Stonefield Homes
Inc a Minnesota Corporation the Property Owner
RECITALS
A Property Owner is the fee owner of certain property in the City of Chanhassen
Carver County Minnesota legally described as
Lot 1 Block 2 Stonefteld
having a street address of 8711 Osprey Lane Chanhassen Minnesota and a property identification number of 25 7540030 the Subject Property
B Property Owner has requested that the City specially assess hook up charges for water of 5 393 00 and sewer of 2 026 00 against the Subject Property
NOW THEREFORE IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS
THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS
1 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT The City hereby assesses the cost of the hook up charges for water of 5 393 00 and for sewer of 2 026 00 totaling 7 419 00 against the Subject Property The assessment shall be spread over four 4 years together with eight percent 8 00 interest per year on the unpaid balance Interest shall accrue from the date of the approval of this
Agreement by the City Council The first installment shall be due and payable with taxes in 2012
The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special
assessment including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment
exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn Stat 429 081 If the special assessment is not timely paid or is set aside for any reason then instead of paying the special assessment the Property Owner
shall pay the City on demand an amount equivalent to the unpaid special assessment together with
any legal fees the City may incur
1 184
2 BINDING EFFECT RECORDING This Agreement shall be binding upon the
Property Owner and the Property Owner s successors heirs and assigns This Agreement may be
recorded against the title to the Subject Property
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
Thomas A Furlong Mayor
SEAL
1
Todd Gerhardt City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss
COUNTY OF CARVER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
2011 by Thomas A Furlong and by Todd Gerhardt respectively the Mayor and
City Manager of the City of Chanhassen a Minnesota corporation on behalf of the corporation and
pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council
NOTARY PUBLIC
K 185
PROPERTY OWNER
Stonefield Homes Inc
By
Its
I
Its
STATE OF M NNESOTA
SS
COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 5 day of
2011 by C K y6min i y a and by the P re S i d eV 1 and of Stonefield Homes Inc a
Minnesota Corporation the Property Owner
NOTARY PUB IC
COLLEEN K MARTINO
3 p Notary Public Minnesota siiP y My Commission Expires Jan 31 20 5
DRAFTED BY
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan Minnesota 55121
Telephone 612 452 5000
RN Y
3 186
Memo
To Mayor
City Council
From Jeff Enevold Lieutenant
Date 11 28 2011 p C e
Re Items for Council Meeting
Sheriffs Office Area Report October Attached
2 Sheriff s Office Area Citation List October Attached
3 Community Service Officer Report
4 Miscellaneous Items I will have brief information for Council on recent
activities or items of interest
187
0
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 2271180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
7901 Park Place
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
Community Service Officer Call Summary
October 2011 Calls76
Animal Calls 22
Animal At Large 4
Stall Motorist Assist
Wild Animal Control 9
Impounds 0 Live Trap Requests 1
B arking Dog 3 Animal Welfare Checks 2
Animal Bites 0 Unlicensed Animals N A
Miscellaneous Animals 2 Injured Sick Animal 1
Traffic Calls 19
Personal Injury Crash 1
2011
Stall Motorist Assist 6
Property Damage Crash 4
Junk Vehicle
Other Traffic 8
Code Enforcement 14
Weeds Grass 0
2011
Odd Even Watering 0
Outdoor Storage 0 Junk Vehicle 0
Illegal Dumping 1 Parking 1
Sidewalk Snow Removal N A Trailer Parking 1
Miscellaneous Code 11
Other 21
Vehicle Lock Outs 6
2011
Medicals 8
Fires 5 Vacation Checks 0
Park Enforcement 0 Found Property 1
Other 1 1
74 TOTAL
Month Comparison
2010 2011
17 Animal Calls 22
28 Traffic Calls 19
8 Code Enforcement 14
21 Other 21
74 TOTAL 76
Year to Date Comparison
2010 2011
239 Animal Calls 236
235 Traffic Calls 240
228 Code Enforcement 294
183 Other 204
885 TOTAL 974
Chanhassen is a Community for Life Providing forTodayand Planning for Tomorrow 188
S NV OLSp ov
C
City of Chanhassen
Monthly Reports for
October 2011
189
Listed below is a description of each of the different classifications of calls for service
which the Carver County Sheriffs Office received and processed for your area
CRIMINAL
Part I Crimes
Arson Intentionally destroy property by fire
Assault Aggravated Assault where substantial injury is caused or deadly weapon used
Burglary Unlawful entry into a structure to commit a crime
Homicide Intentional taking of a persons life
Robbery Taking of property in the presence of another with use of force
Sex Crime felony Forcible sexual assault All felony sex crimes
Theft Taking of property stealing
Theft Vehicle ITheft of a motorized vehicle
Part 11 Crimes
Abuse Neglect Chargeable abuse or neglect of children or adults
Assault Altercation between parties where actual physical harm occurred
Court Order Violations Violation of court orders
Disturb Peace Chargeable disturbance of peace Harassment disorderly conduct
Drug Violation All drug violations possession of sale of manufacture of
Gambling Unlawful operate promote or assist in the operation of gaming
Liquor Laws Illegal Consumption sale or possession of liquor
Misc Criminal Minor offenses that do not fall under any other classification
Property Damage All damage to property including vandalism littering and trespassing on property
Runaway Juvenile runaway
Sex Crimes Misc sex crimes criminal sexual conduct sexual abuse pornography
indecent exposure non felony sex crimes
Suspicious Activity Suspicious activity where charges result
Theft Related Fraud credit card theft ID theft issuance on bad check counterfeiting swindle
Traffic Alcohol Traffic stop or accident involving a driver under the influence of alcohol or drugs
Traffic Other Traffic stop that results in a traffic criminal charge DAC IPS Hit and Run
Weapons lViolation of manufacture sale purchase transport use of firearm
190
NON CRIMINAL
Abuse Neglect NC Investigation of abuse or neglect of a child or adult where no charges are filed
Alarm Checking on an alarm at a private residence or business
Animal Animal bites stray animals All calls involving animals
Assist other Agency Assist other law enforcement office state patrol or government departments
Auto Accd Fatality Auto accident in which a fatality occurred
Auto Accd Injury Auto accident in which injury and property damage occurred
Auto Accd Prop Damage Auto accident in which property damage occurred
Auto Accd MV vs Deer Auto accident involving a motor vehicle and deer
Background Record CheckE Records check for persons adopting a child military govt employment individual
Boat Water All incidents involving boats watercraft and or lakes
Child Care Assistance All background checks for Social Service unlicensed child care assistance
Child Custody Dispute Incidents involving dispute over child custody
Civil Process Service of civil papers court orders Assist with civil stand by situations
Disturb Peace NC Noise harassments disturbance of peace where charges are not filed
Domestic Verbal argument between parties with relationship where no charges are filed
Driving Complaint Complaints of bad driving behavior
Drug Information Information regard drug activity No charges filed
Fire Call Fires and assist to fire departments
Gun Permit Acquire Application for a permit to purchase a handgun
Gun Permit Carry Application for a permit to carry a handgun
Gun Permit Transfer Applicaton for the transfer of one registered gun to another
Explosive Firearms Dlr Application for a permit for explosives or firearms dealer license
House Business Check Check on residences or business when owners are away from property
License Day Care Background check for licensing day care
License Foster Care Background check for licensing foster care
License Liquor Background check for liquor licensing
License Peddler Background check for peddler licensing
Medical Assist persons with medical issues natural cause deaths
Mental Health Suicides 72 hr holds for mental health issues
Misc Non Criminal General law enforcement questions citizen assists lost and found
prop civil matters council packets and meetings juv disciplinary issues etc
Missing Person Missing Lost person
Open Door Located an open door to a business or residence
Prowler NC Person on property who does not belong window peeper No charges filed
Sex Offender Tracking Request from State to check location of registered sex offender
Snowmobile All incidents involving snowmobiles
Suspicious Act NC Suspicious persons acts or vehicles no charges
Traffic Misc Misc traffic issues stalled vehicle debris on roadway traffic control
parking violations vehicle in the ditch and motorist assists
Traffic Radar Display Traffic Speed Radar wagon
Traffic Stops All traffic stops initiated by officers
Transport Transport persons for various reasons
Unlock Veh Bldg Unlock doors of automobile residence or business for owners
Warrant Issued Warrant issued by Carver County Court Administration
Warrant Service IService of warrant for Carver County and other counties
191
CARVER COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE
City of Chanhassen
Month of October
2011 2011
CRIMINAL
Part I Crimes
Arson 0
Assault
Assault Aggravated 0 4
DI 11 IfA 0
1
Homicide 0 0
CRIMINAL
Part I Crimes
Arson 0
Assault
Assault Aggravated 0 4
Burglary 1 39
Homicide 0 0
Robbery 0 1
Sex Crime Felony 0 1
Theft 13 187
Theft Vehicle 0 2
Total art I Crimes
92
Runaway
Part 11 Crimes
Abuse Neglect 0 0
Assault 1 26
Court Order Violation 0 14
Disturb Peace 1 16
Drug Violations 10 49
Gamblinq 0 0
Liquor Law Viol 1 19
Misc Criminal 3 34
Property Damage 14 92
Runaway 1 3
Sex Crimes 0 6
Suspicious Activity 0 0
Theft Related 12 94
Traffic Alcohol 10 89
Traffic Other 2 14
Weapons 0 3
IT otal Pan 11 Crimes
iii
Y tell F1 wil aIIVA I I
0
v
00 0
0
Y tell F1 wil aIIVA I I
0
0
0 0
0
0
00
0
00
Y tell F1 wil aIIVA I I
192
2011 2011 2010 2010
MONTH YTD
3
MONTH
68 645 Abuse Neglect not c a 3 52
Alarm 68 695
Animal 51 437
Assist other Agency 17 97
Auto Accd Fatality 0 0
Auto Accd Injury 3 30
Auto Accd Prop Damage 31 335
Auto Accd MV Deer 8 27
Background Records Check 12 146
Boat Water 0 33
Child Care Asst Unlicensed 0 0
Child Custody Dispute 1 14
Civil Process 1 22
Dist Peace not char able 35 365
Domestic not char able 3 39
Driving Complaints 42 384
Dru Information Only 3 19
Fire Call 18 151
Gun Permit Acquire 6 115
Gun Permit Carry 5 55
Gun Permit Transfer 0 0
Explosive Firearms Dir Permit 0 0
House Business Check 4 20
License Day Care 1 13
License Foster Care 0 0
License Liquor 1 28
License Peddler 2 69
Medical 70 585
Mental Health 3 65
Misc Non Criminal 67 635
Missing Person 2 20
Open Door 3 23
Prowler not char able 0 0
Sex Offender Tracking 0 0
Snowmobile 0 4
Suspicious Act not char able 79 857
Traffic Misc 71 1071
Traffic Radar Display 0 0
Traffic Stops 564 4462
Transport 0 28
Unlock Veh Bld 8 66
Warrant Service 8 67
TOTAL NON CRIMINAC 1190 11029
2010 2010
MONTH YTD
3 19
68 645
32 381
11 93
0 1
5 29
28 281
7 32
4 134
0 25
0 0
1 16
4 23
33 313
3 39
33 367
0 13
21 137
12 93
7 50
0 0
0 0
1 13
0 17
0 0
0 26
13 18
62 561
7 47
65 573
5 24
1 22
0 2
0 2
0 7
86 750
83 874
0 0
350 3000
1 6
6 60
15 71 876d
193
Cam Mumi SLOW MUM slam MEN OEM 92EM MUM MUMME 109MLOIZ MULIM
JUKIMINAL
11 art rimes
i a l t s Ali iz J
iL iE ti ti
S a V 7
194
anuary
INUN L
J une I My I AUgUSt ep em c o r ovem ecem
It nlock
M l
t Ura la1 l a i i 3LS 7 iiC at as a
195
Arrests and Summons Complaints for
City of Chanhassen
From 10 01 2011 To 10 31 2011
ICR Reported Arrest Type Arr Date Off Level MOC Charge Cit Beat City wsp
201100031477 01 10 1 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 01 2011 Gr Misd J3T01 TRAF ACC MS UNDAGE DRIN 11000001 0250 Chanhassen City
201100031477 02 10 1 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 01 2011 Misd M4140 LIQUOR UNDERAGE CONSUM 11000001 0250 Chanhassen City
201100031477 03 10 1 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 01 2011 Misd M3001 JUVENILE ALCOHOL OFFEND 11000001 0250 Chanhassen City
201100031483 01 10 1 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 01 2011 Misd M4140 LIQUOR UNDERAGE CONSUM 0250 Chanhassen City
201100031483 02 10 1 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 01 2011 Misd DC500 DRUGS DRUG PARAPH POSSE 0250 Chanhassen City
201100031578 01 10 1 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 01 2011 Misd DA540 DRUGS SM AMT IN MOT VEH 1 0250 Chanhassen City
201100031578 01 10 1 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 01 2011 Misd DC500 DRUGS DRUG PARAPH POSSE 0250 Chanhassen City
201100031775 01 10 3 11 Arrested Booked 10 03 2011 Misd JG501 TRAF ACC M 4TH DEG DWI Ul 353637 0250 Chanhassen City
201100031778 01 10 3 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 04 2011 Misd X3190 CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST MS 1 359878 0250 Chanhassen City
201100031832 01 10 4 11 Arrested Booked 10 04 2011 Gr Misd J2901 TRAFFIC GM OTHER MV 10001101 0250 Chanhassen City
201100031832 01 10 4 11 Arrested Booked 10 04 2011 Gr Misd JF501 TRAF AC GM 3RD DEG DWI U 10001101 0250 Chanhassen City
201100032139 01 10 7 11 Arrested Booked 10 07 2011 Misd JG501 TRAF ACC M 4TH DEG DWI Ul 10001101 0250 Chanhassen City
201100032198 01 10 7 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 07 2011 Misd J3301 ACCIDENT MS FAIL STOP DRV 10001101 0250 Chanhassen City
201100032249 01 10 7 11 Arrested Booked 10 07 2011 Misd JG501 TRAF ACC M 4TH DEG DWI IA 359880 0250 Chanhassen City
201100032405 01 10 8 11 Arrested Booked 10 08 2011 Misd AL551 DOM ASLT MS FEAR BODILY f 10011001 0250 Chanhassen City
201100032474 01 10 9 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 09 2011 Misd M5350 JUVENILE RUNAWAY 10011001 0250 Chanhassen City
201100032527 01 10 9 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 09 2011 Petty Misd DC500 DRUGS DRUG PARAPH POSSE 358545 0250 Chanhassen City
201100032864 01 10 12 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 12 2011 Misd D8540 DRUGS SMALL AMOUNT MAR 357945 0250 Chanhassen City
201100032864 01 10 12 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 12 2011 Misd DC500 DRUGS DRUG PARAPH POSSE 357945 0250 Chanhassen City
201100032902 01 10 13 11 Arrested Booked 10 13 2011 Misd X3140 CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST MS 1 359777 0250 Chanhassen City
201100032983 01 10 13111 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 14 2011 Misd DA540 DRUGS SM AMT IN MOT VEH 1 10001101 0250 Chanhassen City
201100032983 01 10 13 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 14 2011 Misd DC500 DRUGS DRUG PARAPH POSSE 10001101 0250 Chanhassen City
201100033108 01 10 14 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 14 2011 Misd N3030 DISTURB PEACE MS DISORDE 358993 0250 Chanhassen City
201100033200 01 10 15 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 15 2011 Misd DC500 DRUGS DRUG PARAPH POSSE 10001101 0250 Chanhassen City
201100033200 01 10 15 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 15 2011 Misd M3001 JUVENILE ALCOHOL OFFEND 10001101 0250 Chanhassen City
201100033224 01 10 16 11 Arrested Booked 10 16 2011 Petty Misd DA548 DRUGS SM AMT IN MOT VEH 1 0250 Chanhassen City
201100033224 01 10 16 11 Arrested Booked 10 16 2011 Felony DH5Co CON SUB 5 POSSESS METHAM 0250 Chanhassen City
201100033224 01 10 16 11 Arrested Booked 10 16 2011 Misd J3901 TRAFFIC MS OTHER MV 0250 Chanhassen City
201100033284 01 10 16 11 Arrested Booked 10 16 2011 Misd JG501 TRAF ACC M 4TH DEG DWI Ul 359876 0250 Chanhassen City
201100033354 01 10 17 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 17 2011 Misd P311L PROP DAM MS PRPDMG PRIVE 348287 0250 Chanhassen City
201100033411 02 10 17 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 18 2011 Misd X3200 CRIM AGNST ADM JUST MS G 358546 0250 Chanhassen City
201100033554 01 10 19 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 19 2011 Misd J3T01 TRAF ACC MS UND AGE DRIN 10001101 0250 Chanhassen City 201100033554 02 10 19 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 19 2011 Misd DC500 DRUGS DRUG PARAPH POSSE 10001101 0250 Chanhassen City 201100033554 02 10 19 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 19 2011 Misd M3001 JUVENILE ALCOHOL OFFEND 10001101 0250 Chanhassen City 201100033631 01 10 19 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 19 2011 Misd J3301 ACCIDENT MS FAIL STOP DRV 359858 0250 Chanhassen City
196
ICR Reported Arrest Type Arr Date Off Level MOC Charge Cit Beat Citv Twsp
201100033820 01 10 20 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 20 2011 Petty Misd DC500 DRUGS DRUG PARAPH POSSE 10001101 0250 Chanhassen City
201100033869 01 10 21 11 Arrested Booked 10 21 2011 Gr Misd J2901 TRAFFIC GM OTHER MV 357816 0250 Chanhassen City
201100033869 01 10 21 11 Arrested Booked 10 21 2011 Gr Misd JF501 TRAF AC GM 3RD DEG DWI U 357816 0250 Chanhassen City
201100033937 01 10 21 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 21 2011 Petty Misd DA540 DRUGS SM AMT IN MOT VEH 1 10001101 0250 Chanhassen City
201100033937 01 10 21 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 21 2011 Petty Misd DC500 DRUGS DRUG PARAPH POSSE 10001101 0250 Chanhassen City 201100034113 01 10 23 11 Arrested Booked 10 23 2011 Misd JG501 TRAF ACC M 4TH DEG DWI Ul 10001101 0250 Chanhassen City 201100034179 01 10 23 11 Arrested Booked 10 23 2011 Misd JG501 TRAF ACC M 4TH DEG DWI U 359154 0250 Chanhassen City 201100034196 01 10 24 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 24 2011 Misd D8540 DRUGS SMALL AMOUNT MAR 348289 0250 Chanhassen City 201100034196 01 10 24 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 24 2011 Misd DC500 DRUGS DRUG PARAPH POSSEt 348289 0250 Chanhassen City 201100034438 01 10 26 11 Summons Cite Bail Pd 10 26 2011 Misd DA540 DRUGS SM AMT W MOT VEH 1 0250 Chanhassen City 201100035036 01 10 31 11 Arrested Booked 10 28 2011 Felony U0550 FRAUD UNK FIN TRAN CARD 0250 Chanhassen City
Total ICR s 31
Total Individuals Arrested 35 Total Charges 46
197
Carver County Sheriff
Traffic Citation Listing For City of Chanhassen
From 10 01 2011 To 10 31 2011
Beat Citation Nr Issued Date
0250 100011000619 10 01 2011
0250 100011000623 10 01 2011
0250 100011000624 10 01 2011
0250 100011000625 10 01 2011
0250 100011000636 10 03 2011
0250 100011000637 10 03 2011
0250 100011000650 10 04 2011
0250 100011000651 10 04 2011
0250 100011000653 10 04 2011
0250 100011000646 10 04 2011
0250 100011000661 10 05 2011
100011000655
100011000676
100011000678
100011000684
100011000690
100011000703
100011000711
100011000721
100011000722
100011000724
100011000727
100011000729
100011000730
000000359872
100011000734
100011000735
100011000737
100011000741
100011000742
100011000746
10 05 2011
10 07 2011
10 07 2011
10 08 2011
10 08 2011
10 09 2011
10 11 2011
10 11 2011
10 12 2011
10 12 2011
10 12 2011
10 12 2011
10 13 2011
10 13 2011
10 13 2011
10 13 2011
10 14 2011
10 14 2011
10 14 2011
10 14 2011
Locatio n Local Code
Hwy 212 Hwy 101 J3T01
9040
Hwy 5 Galpin Blvd 9040
Motorplex Ct Audubon Rd 9063
96 St W Great Plains By 9227
Carver Beach Rd Powers Blv 9061
Hwy 212 Pioneer Trl 9040
79 St Market Blvd 9220
Hwy 5 Audubon Rd 9220
Hwy 5 Powers Blvd 9274
Hwy 7 Arbor Ln 9040
Century Blvd Hwy 5 9204
9220
Pioneer TrlBluff Creek Dr 9220
9274
2679 78 St W J3301
78 St W Hwy 101 9274
Hwy 5 Galpin Blvd 9040
Pioneer TrlBluff Creek Dr 9040
Powers Blvd Lake Dr E 9060
Co Rd 61 Hwy 101 9274
79 St Market Blvd 9274
2200 Lyman Blvd 9279
Hwy 41 Lake Lucy Rd 9040
Santa Vera Dr Powers Blvd 9004
Hwy 5 Market Blvd 9069
Lake Susan Hills Dr Powers 1 9042
Pioneer Trl Bluff Creek Dr 9040
Hwy 101 Lyman Blvd 9040
78 St W Target Entrance 9202
Del Rio Dr Santa Fe Tr 9279
Powers Blvd 78 St W 9066
Hwy 101 78 St W 9066
Co Rd 61 Bluff Creek Dr 9220
Charge Literal
TRAF ACC MS UND AGE DRINK
Speed
Speed
Reckless Or Careless Driving
Expired DL
Improper Pass
Speed
DAS DAR DAC
DAS DAR DAC
No Proof Of Insurance
Speed
License Plate Impoundment
DAS DAR DAC
DAS DAR DAC
No Proof Of Insurance
ACCIDENT MS FAIL STOP DRVI
No Proof Of Insurance
Speed
Speed
Failure To Yield
No Proof Of Insurance
No Proof Of Insurance
Expired Tabs
Speed
Fail To Move For Emerg Veh
Turning Or Starting
Littering fromMV
Speed
Speed
No Valid Mn DL
Expired Tabs
Traffic Control Device
Traffic Control Device
DAS DAR DAC
Statute
169A 33 2
169 14 2 a 2
169 14 2 a
169 13 2
171 27 a
169 18 4
169 14 2 a
171 24 2
171 24 1
169 791 2
169 14 2 a
168 10 3 1
171 24 2
171 24 1
169 791 2
169 09 4
169 791 2
169 14 2 a 3
169 14 2 a 1
169 21 2 a 1
169 791 2
169 791 2
168 09 4
169 14 2 a 3
169 18 1l a
169 19 4
169 42 1
N
169 14 2 a
171 02 1
169 79 1
169 06 5 a 3 1
169 06 4 a
171 24 2
Citation Type
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
198
Carver County Sheriff
Traffic Citation Listing For City of Chanhassen
From 10 01 2011 To 10 31 2011
Beat Citation Nr Issued Date Locatio n Local Code Charge Literal Statute Citation Type
0250 100011000747 10 14 2011 Hwy 5 Audubon Rd 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
0250 100011000748 10 14 2011 78 St W Market Blvd 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
0250 100011000750 10 14 2011 Hwy 5 Galpin Blvd 9220 DAS DAR DAC 171 24 3 Citation
9274 No Proof Of Insurance 169 791 2
0250 100011000752 10 14 2011 Hwy 5 Great Plains Blvd 9220 DAS DAR DAC 171 24 2 Citation
0250 100011000755 10 15 2011 Hwy 5 Powers Blvd 9040 Speed 169 14 2 a Citation
0250 100011000757 10 15 2011 Hwy 212 Powers Blvd 9040 Speed 169 14 2 a 2 Citation
0250 000000337673 10 15 2011 78 St W Great Plains Blvd 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
0250 000000337674 10 15 2011 79 St Market Blvd 9274 No Proof Of Insurance 169 791 2 Citation
0250 100011000769 10 16 2011 Hwy 101 Pleasant View Rd 9274 No Proof Of Insurance 169 791 2 Citation
0250 100011000772 10 17 2011 78 St W Target Entrance 9274 No Proof Of Insurance 169 791 2 Citation
0250 000000359807 10 17 2011 Co Rd 61 Hwy 101 9208 No MN DL In Possession 171 08 Citation
9289 Illegal Lights Equipment 169 79 1
0250 000000359808 10 17 2011 Co Rd 61 Bluff Creek Dr 9274 No Proof Of Insurance 169 791 2 Citation
9287 Child Restraint Violation 169 685 5 a
0250 000000359812 10 17 2011 Co Rd 61 Hwy 101 9211 Fail To Change Doicile Name On Dl 171 11 Citation
9068 Impeding Traffic 169 15 1
0250 000000359814 10 17 2011 Co Rd 61 Bluff Creek Dr 9208 No MN DL In Possession 171 02 1 Citation
0250 100011000776 10 17 2011 Hwy 5 Hwy 41 9274 No Proof Of Insurance 169 791 2 Citation
0250 000000359815 10 17 2011 Co Rd 61 Stoughton Av 9202 No Valid Mn DL 171 02 1 Citation
9274 No Proof Of Insurance 169 791 2
0250 000000359816 10 17 2011 Hwy 101 Co Rd 14 9274 No Proof Of Insurance 169 791 2 Citation
0250 000000356595 10 17 2011 Hwy 101 Co Rd 14 9208 No MN DL In Possession 171 02 1 Citation
9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a
9274 No Proof Of Insurance 169 791 2
0250 000000356594 10 18 2011 Co Rd 61 Hwy 101 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
0250 000000356592 10 18 2011 Co Rd 61 Hwy 101 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
0250 000000359080 10 18 2011 Co Rd 61 Hwy 101 9274 No Proof Of Insurance 169 791 2 Citation
0250 000000359068 10 18 2011 Co Rd 61 Hwy 101 9274 No Proof Of Insurance 169 791 2 Citation
0250 000000356730 10 18 2011 Co Rd 61 Hwy 101 9274 No Proof Of Insurance 169 791 2 Citation
0250 000000359066 10 18 2011 Co Rd 61 Hwy 101 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
0250 000000356590 10 18 2011 Co Rd 61 Hwy 101 9220 DAS DAR DAC 171 24 1 Citation
9274 No Proof Of Insurance 169 791 2
9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a
199
Carver County Sheriff
Traffic Citation Listing For City of Chanhassen
From 10 01 2011 To 10 31 2011
Beat Citation Nr Issued Date Locatio n Local Code Charge Literal Statute Citation Type
0250 000000356731 10 18 2011 Co Rd 61 Bluff Creek Dr 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
0250 000000359065 10 18 2011 Co Rd 61 Hwy 101 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
9274 No Proof Of Insurance 169 791 2
0250 000000356591 10 18 2011 Co Rd 61 Hwy 101 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
0250 000000356732 10 18 2011 Co Rd 61 Hwy 101 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
0250 000000355264 10 18 2011 Co Rd 61 Stoughton Av 9040 Speed 169 14 2 a Citation
9274 No Proof Of Insurance 169 791 2
0250 00000 0355265 10 18 2011 Co Rd 611Hwy 101 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
9274 No Proof Of Insurance 169 791 2
0250 000000356733 10 18 2011 Co Rd 61 Stoughton Av 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
0250 000000356734 10 18 2011 Co Rd 61 Stoughton Av 9274 No Proof Of Insurance 169 797 2 Citation
0250 000000356735 10 18 2011 Co Rd 61 Stoughton Av 9274 No Proof Of Insurance 169 797 2 Citation
0250 000000356582 10 18 2011 Co Rd 61 Bluff Creek Dr 9279 Expired Tabs 169 79 1 Citation
9211 Fail To Change Doicile Name On Dl 171 11
0250 100011000790 10 19 2011 Hwy 5 Powers Blvd 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
0250 100011000804 10 20 2011 Hwy 5 Park Dr 9004 Fail To Move For Emerg Veh 169 18 11 a Citation
0250 100011000805 10 20 2011 78 St W Market Blvd 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
0250 100011000806 10 20 2011 Hwy 212 Pioneer Trl 9279 Expired Tabs 169 79 1 Citation
0250 100011000811 10 20 2011 Hwy 212 Pioneer Trl 9208 No MN DL In Possession 171 08 Citation
9040 Speed 169 14 2 a
9274 No Proof Of Insurance 169 791 2
0250 100011000812 10 20 2011 Hwy 212 Hwy 101 9004 Fail To Move For Emerg Veh 169 18 11 a Citation
0250 100011000814 10 21 2011 Powers Blvd Lake Dr E 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
0250 100011000820 10 21 2011 Galpin Blvd Brinker St 9065 Stop Sign 169 30 b Citation
0250 100011000821 10 21 2011 Century Blvd Coulter Blvd 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
0250 100011000829 10 21 2011 Hwy 5 Market Blvd 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
0250 100011000830 10 21 2011 Hwy 7 Minnewashta Pkwy 9040 Speed 169 14 2 a Citation
0250 100011000831 1 0 21 2011 Hwy 7 Minnewashta Pkwy 9040 Speed 169 14 2 a Citation
0250 1000 11000832 10 22 2011 Co Rd 61 Hwy 101 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
0250 100011000833 10 22 2011 Co Rd 61 Hwy 101 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
0250 100011000835 10 22 2011 Hwy 5 Market Blvd 9279 Expired Tabs 168 09 4 Citation
0250 000000358234 10 22 2011 Pioneer Trl Hwy 101 9061 Improper Pass N Citation
0250 100011000838 10 22 2011 Hwy 5 Market Blvd 9220 DAS DAR DAC 171 24 1 Citation
3 200
Carver County Sheriff
Traffic Citation Listing For City of Chanhassen
From 10 01 2011 To 10 31 2011
Citation Nr Issued Date Locatio n Local Code Charge Literal Statute Citation Type
000000359873 10 22 2011 Lyman Blvd Powers Blvd 9220 DAS DAR DAC N Citation
9236 Use Unregistered Veh 168 36 Or 161 N
9274 No Proof Of Insurance N
000000359782 10 23 2011 Hwy 101 Kurvers Point Rd 9274 No Proof Of Insurance 169 791 2 Citation
000000359945 10 23 2011 78 St W Kerber Blvd 9274 No Proof Of Insurance N Citation
100011000844 10 24 2011 Galpin Blvd Lyman Blvd 9040 Speed 169 14 2 a Citation
000000359208 10 25 2011 Hwy 212 Powers Blvd 9040 Speed 169 14 2 a 2 Citation
000000359209 10 25 2011 78 St W Kerber Blvd 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
9227 Expired DL 171 02 1
000000356598 10 25 2011 Hwy 5 Great Plains Blvd 9066 Traffic Control Device 169 06 4 a Citation
100011000886 10 26 2011 7250 Hwy 41 9040 Speed 169 14 2 a Citation
100011000895 10 26 2011 78 St W Powers Blvd 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
100011000898 10 26 2011 Co Rd 61 Hwy 101 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
100011000899 10 26 2011 Hwy 7 Greenbriar 9069 Turning Or Starting 169 20 2 Citation
100011000900 10 26 2011 Powers Blvd Lake Dr E 9279 Expired Tabs 169 79 1 Citation
100011000904 10 26 2011 78 St W Market Blvd 9064 Over Center Fog Line 169 18 1 Citation
100011000905 10 26 2011 Carver Beach Rd Powers Blv 9220 DAS DAR DAC 171 24 2 Citation
9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a
100011000907 10 27 2011 Hwy 101 Lyman Blvd 9220 DAS DAR DAC 171 24 2 Citation
000000359859 10 27 2011 78 St W Laredo Dr 9286 Seatbelt Violation N Citation
100011000914 10 27 2011 78 St W Great Plains Blvd 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
000000359860 10 27 2011 78 St W Great Plains Blvd 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
000000356600 10 27 2011 78 St W Kerber Blvd 9286 Seatbelt Violation N Citation
000000356601 10 27 2011 78 St W Great Plains Blvd 9286 Seatbelt Violation N Citation
100011000915 10 27 2011 Hwy 5 Audubon Rd 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
9274 No Proof Of Insurance 169 791 2
100011000916 10 27 2011 79 St Great Plains Blvd 9202 No Valid Mn DL 171 02 1 Citation
100011000918 10 27 2011 79 St Market Blvd 9065 Stop Sign 169 30 b Citation
100011000919 10 27 2011 78 St W Erie Av 9289 Illegal Lights Equipment 169 79 7 Citation
000000359256 10 27 2011 78 St W Great Plains Blvd 9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a Citation
100011000921 10 27 2011 78 St W Hwy 101 9227 Expired DL 171 02 1 Citation
9211 Fail To Change Doicile Name On Dl 171 11
9286 Seatbelt Violation 169 686 1 a
100011000923 10 27 2011 78 St W Market Blvd 9211 Fail To Change Doicile Name On Dl 171 11 Citation
4 201
Carver County Sheriff
Traffic Citation Listing For City of Chanhassen
From 10 01 2011 To 10 31 2011
Beat Citation Nr Issued Date
0250 100011000927 10 27 2011
0250 100011000928 10 28 2011
0250 100011000930 10 28 2011
0250 100011000934 10 28 2011
0250 100011000939 10 28 2011
0250 100011000945 10 28 2011
0250 100011000944 10 28 2011
0250 100011000947 10 28 2011
0250 100011000949 10 28 2011
0250 100011000952 10 29 2011
0250 100011000953 10 29 2011
0250 100011000957 10 30 2011
0250 100011000959 10 30 2011
0250 000000359787 10 30 2011
0250 100011000960 10 30 2011
0250 100011000961 10 31 2011
0250 100011000962 10 31 2011
TOTAL CITATIONS ISSUED 127
Locatio n Local Code
Hwy 101 Lake Dr 9066
Kerber Blvd Pontiac Ln 9220
Hwy 212 Hwy 101 9274
Co Rd 61 Hwy 101 9220
9274
Pioneer TrlBluff Creek Dr 9040
Hwy 5 Market Blvd 9279
Hwy 5 Great Plains Blvd 9004
Hwy 101 78 St 9202
9274
Hwy 5 Powers Blvd 9202
9274
Hwy 5 Audubon Rd 9040
Lake Lucy Rd Lake Lucy Ln 9064
Hwy 5 Great Plains Blvd 9069
Hwy 212 Pioneer Trl 9040
9274
Minnewashta Pkwy Linden C 9274
79 St Market Blvd 9274
Hwy 7 Pipewood Curve 9040
9274
Hwy 41 Longacres Dr 9040
Charge Literal
Traffic Control Device
DAS DAR DAC
No Proof Of Insurance
DAS DAR DAC
No Proof Of Insurance
Speed
Expired Tabs
Fail To Move For Emerg Veh
No Valid Mn DL
No Proof Of Insurance
No Valid Mn DL
No Proof Of Insurance
Speed
Over Center Fog Line
Turning Or Starting
Speed
No Proof Of Insurance
No Proof Of Insurance
No Proof Of Insurance
Speed
No Proof Of Insurance
Speed
Statute
169 06 5 a 3
171 24 2
169 791 2
171 24 2
169 791 2
169 14 2 a
169 79 1
169 18 11 a
171 02 1
169 791 2
171 02 1
169 791 2
169 14 2 a
169 18 1
169 19 1 d
169 14 2 a
169 791 2
169 791 2
169 791 2
169 14 2 a
169 791 2
169 14 2 a
Citation Tvae
5
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
202
Carver County Sheriff
Traffic Warning Listing For City of Chanhassen
From 10 01 2011 To 10 31 2011
Beat Citation Nr Issued Date Locatio n
0250 W04101 10 03 2011 Hwy 5 Audubon Rd
0250 W04095 10 03 2011 Hwy 7 Hwy 41
0250 W04111 10 09 2011 Hwy 212 Pioneer Trl
0250 W04112 10 20 2011 Hwy 5 Audubon Rd
0250 W03688 10 21 2011
0250 W04113 10 22 2011
0250 W04114 10 24 2011
TOTAL CITATIONS ISSUED 7
Hwy 7 Minnewashta Pkwy
Hwy 7 Hwy 41
Hwy 5 Market Blvd
Local Code Charge Literal Statute Citation Tvae
9249 All Light Malfunctions N Warning Notice
9289 Illegal Lights Equipment N Warning Notice
9040 Speed N Warning Notice
9069 Turning Or Starting N Warning Notice
9249 All Light Malfunctions N
9279 Expired Tabs N Warning Notice
9289 Illegal Lights Equipment N Warning Notice
9249 All Light Malfunctions N Warning Notice
203
CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT
Station t
PO Box 97
7610 Laredo Drive
Chanhassen MN 55317
Station 2
6400 Minnewashta Pkwy
Excelsior MN 55331
TO Todd Gerhardt City Manager
FROM John Wolff Fire Chief
Ed Coppersmith 0 Assistant Chief V Rick Rice 2 Assistant Chief
Mark Littfin Fire Marshal
DATE November 17 2011
SUBJ Monthly City Council Update
Fire Department Overview
Staffing is at 48 active firefighters as of November 16 2011 There are two firefighters currently
on leave and five new members attending probationary firefighter training A total of five
firefighters have retired this year Shelley Mehl the longest tenured female firefighter in
Chanhassen s history announced her retirement this week after 21 years of service We
anticipate that three to four firefighters may retire or resign in 2012
Year to date YTD there have been 475 calls for service which is a 14 7 reduction At this
time last year we were at 557 calls for service The primary driver for the difference is the high
number of EMS medical calls we saw last year This year we have also seen a 15 reduction in
false alarms
There were 43 calls in October 2011 compared to 50 in 2010
There was one call for mutual aid during the month of October
Staff Time not call related Our staff time for community events fire education duty crew
standby department meetings and training is at 6 291 hours year to date At the same time last
year we were at 5 451 hours
204
Training Training for the month of October has involved over 310 hours of training It has
covered areas such as sport injuries hazardous material response first and second engine
response procedures incident command and use of tactical worksheets We also participated in
training at the Southwest Metro Training Facility with several other departments covering mutual
aid response procedures
Fire Marshal
Fire Prevention Fire Prevention week officially ended October 21 Between the four
elementary schools pre schools day cares and station tours we had interactions with over 2 000
children We received many positive comments from teachers parents and kids The number of
Chanhassen firefighters who volunteered their time broke records and continues to grow each
year
This year as in past years the firefighters took to the streets on Halloween evening with a
decorated fire truck handing out candy and hot cider to kids and parents who were out
trick or treating Our crew also made several stops at neighborhood block parties to visit with
residents and let the kids climb on the truck
Fire Investigations We had a few fires occur during the month of October to report on
A dumpster fire located at 780 Flying Cloud Drive occurred on October 10 at 12 54 PM There
was no damage to the property
Another small fire was in an air compressor on October 17 at 9 21 PM located at RR Donnelly at 18780 West 78 Street The fire was kept under control by one fire sprinkler head with final
extinguishment done by the fire department The company was able to resume operations once
the fire department cleared the scene and was back in the business the following day Excelsior
Minnetonka and Eden Prairie Fire Departments were called for assistance We were on the scene
for approximately two hours and no injuries were reported
Then on October 28 the fire department responded to a woods fire on Homestead Lane We
had two grass rigs and one tanker from Chanhassen one tanker from Chaska one grass rig from
Victoria and Eden Prairie was standing by at Station 1 with an engine and crew There was no
damage to the property and no injuries were reported
Fire Inspections Projects at various stages of completion include downtown parking ramp
K Hovnanian Town Homes Autobahn Motorplex Futurestar Wooddale Town Homes Total
Automotive Express Track the Cub Foods expansion and a few smaller remodeling projects
205
c
Summary of Total Calls
October 2011 2011 YTD October 2010 2010 YTD
Total 43 465 50 542
Detail of Incident Types
October 2011 2011 YTD October 2010 2010 YTD
Incident Type
Fire 5 28 3 27
Structure Fire 1 9 0 11
Grass Fire 1 4 0 1
Misc Fires 3 15 3 15
Overpressure Rupture Explosion Overheat 0 0 0 1
Rescue Emer enc Medical Service Incident 23 091 247
Medical 21 166 17 206
PI Crash 2 31 4 38
Misc Calls 0 2 0 3
Hazardous Condition 6 49 5 36
Gas Leak 2 23 3 19
Misc Calls 4 26 2 17
Service Call 1 17 2 24
Mutual Aid 0 9 0 11
Misc Calls 1 8 2 13
Good Intent Call 3 68 5 73
Rescue Medical Dispatched Cancelled 1 20 2 30
Smoke Scare Odor of Smoke 1 16 2 13
PI Dispatched Cancelled 0 11 0 7
Misc Calls 1 21 1 23
False Alarm False Call 5 102 14 130
CO Alarm 1 17 0 1 6
Dirty Old Smoke Detector Activation 0 10 2 6
Unintentional Transmission of Alarm 3 55 6 51
Burnt Food Smoke Detector 1 5 0 12
Misc Calls 0 15 6 45
Severe Weather Natural Disaster 0 2 0 4
Total Iucident counf 43 465 50 542
206
4 CITY OF CHANHASSEN
PC DATE November 1 2011
CC DATE November 28 2011
REVIEW DEADLINE January 27 2012
CASE 2011 11
BY AF KA TJ JS
PROPOSED MOTION
City Council direct staff to prepare Findings of Fact for Denial of the Concept Planned Unit
Development
APPLICANT Walmart
c o Kimley Horn Associates
2550 University Ave W Ste 238N
St Paul MN 55114
William D Matzek
651 643 0497
Will MatzekAkimley horn com
PRESENT ZONING Industrial Office Park IOP
iStar Minnesota LLC
c o iStar Financial Inc
1114 Avenue of the Americas 27 Floor
New York NY 10036
2030 LAND USE PLAN Office Industrial and Commercial
ACREAGE Approximately 14 acres
SUMMARY OF REQUEST The developer is requesting a rezoning to permit commercial
development on land currently guided for industrial office and community commercial use In
conjunction with the request the applicant is requesting approval for a general concept plan for a
PUD for a 120 000 square foot Walmart
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION MAKING
The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a rezoning because the
City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity A PUD must be consistent with the
City s Comprehensive Plan
PROPOSAL SUMMARY
The applicant is requesting a general concept plan for a Planned Unit Development PUD The
site is currently zoned Industrial Office Park IOP With the adoption of the 2030
Comprehensive Plan in 2008 the City Council guided the property for office industrial and
commercial land use In 2009 the city adopted the Community Commercial CC zoning
district in order to implement the community commercial land use vision The request for a
Planned Unit Development concept plan allows the applicant to seek a unique zoning district
The closest conventional zoning district is Community Commercial see Attachment 1
207
Walmart Concept Planned Unit Development
November 28 2011
Page 2 of 20
Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site The use of the PUD zoning
also allows for a greater variety of uses internal transfer of density construction phasing and a
potential for lower development costs In exchange for this enhanced flexibility the development
plan must result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been
the case with the other more standard zoning districts It is the applicant s responsibility to
demonstrate that the City s expectations are to be realized as evaluated against the intent of the PUD
and nine specific standards
PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 1 2011 The Planning
Commission voted 7 to 0 to recommend denial of the Concept Planned Unit Development based
on the findings that the intent and specific standards of the Planned Unit Development were not
met The verbatim minutes are found in item 1 a of the City Council packet
Since the Planning Commission meeting the applicant has submitted revisions to the plans They
include the following
Architecture
Landscaping signage
Parking
Relocation of the retaining wall out of the wetland buffer
In addition Walmart has agreed to finance the costs of all of the recommended off site traffic
improvements that were listed in the November 1 St staff report see attached response to PUD
letter dated 11 21 11
BACKGROUND
Concept PUD What is required
The intent of the concept plan is to get direction from the Planning Commission and City
Council without incurring a lot of expense There will be a greater level of detail required
through the city code and the recommendations and direction in this report Following are the
requirements for conceptual PUD approval
Chanhassen City Code Section 20 517 General concept plan
a The general concept plan for a PUD provides an opportunity for the applicant to submit a
plan to the city showing the basic intent and the general nature of the entire development
without incurring substantial cost The plan shall include the following
1 Overall gross and net density
2 Identification of each lot size and lot width
208
Walmart Concept Planned Unit Development
November 28 2011
Page 3 of 20
3 General location of major streets and pedestrian ways
4 General location and extent of public and common open space
5 General location and type of land uses and intensities of development
6 Staging and time schedule for development
b The tentative written consent of all property owners within the proposed PUD shall be
filed with the city before the staff commences review Approval of the concept statement
shall not obligate the city to approve the final plan or any part thereof or to rezone the
property to a planned unit development district
c The final acceptance of land uses is subject to the following procedures
1 The developer meets with the city staff to discuss the proposed developments
2 The applicant shall file the concept stage application and concept plan together
with all supporting data
3 The planning commission shall conduct a hearing and report its findings and
make recommendations to the city council Notice of the hearing shall consist of
a legal property description description of request and be published in the
official newspaper at least ten 10 days prior to the hearing written notification
of the hearing shall be mailed at least ten 10 days prior thereto to owners of
land within five hundred 500 feet of the boundary of the property and an
on site notification sign erected
4 Following the receipt of the report and recommendations from the planning
commission the city council shall consider the proposal If the planning
commission fails to make a report within 60 days after receipt of the application
then the city council may proceed without the report The council may approve
the concept plan and attach such conditions as it deems reasonable Approval
shall require a simple majority vote of city council except for proposals requiring
comprehensive plan changes which shall require a four fifths vote of the entire
city council
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The 14 acre site contains an existing building with a footprint of 140 020 square feet There is a
mezzanine section in the building creating a total area of 154 674 square feet The original building
was occupied by Victory Envelope The building has been vacant for several years With this
development proposal the current building is proposed to be torn down Attachment 42 shows a
market value comparison between industrial and commercial use for this site
209
Walmart Concept Planned Unit Development
November 28 2011
Page 4 of 20
The site is bordered by TH 5 on the north Powers Boulevard on the east a wetland with a stream
running through it on the west and Park Road on the south Access to the site is gained via Park
Road The elevation of the site changes 40 feet from the creek on the western portion of the property
to the intersection of Powers Boulevard and TH 5
IN
fe
Oo 88ft
a
T
APPLICABLE REGUATIONS
Chapter 20
Article VIII Planned Unit Development District
Article VI Wetland Protection
Article VII Shoreland Management district
Article XXIII Division 7 Design Standards for Commercial Industrial and Office
Development District
Article II Division 6 of Site Plan Review
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Following is the section of the comprehensive plan regarding community commercial
2 7 3 Community and General Commercial
Definition Vision A large scale commercial and office district with a need for high visibility
along Arterial roads This type of development has a moderate impact on the surrounding
environment including but not limited to lighting noise and traffic
210
Walmart Concept Planned Unit Development
November 28 2011
Page 5 of 20
Location criteria for Community Commercial uses are access to arterial streets preferably at
intersections with collector and arterial streets moderate to large sized sites public water and
sewer service environmental features such as soils and topography suitable for compact
development and adequate buffering by physical features or adjacent uses to protect nearby
residential development
Goods and Services Examples
Furniture and Home Furnishings
Electronics and Appliance Stores
Building Material and Garden Supplies
Auto Parts and Accessories
Sporting Goods
A new zoning district CC Community Commercial will be created in the City Code to
implement this land use
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INTENT
Sec 20 501 Intent
Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of
most normal zoning district standards The use of the PUD zoning also allows for a greater
variety of uses internal transfer of density construction phasing and a potential for lower
development costs In exchange for this enhanced flexibility the city has the expectation that the
development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than
would have been the case with the other more standard zoning districts It will be the applicant s
responsibility to demonstrate that the City s expectations are to be realized as evaluated against
the following criteria Planned unit developments are to encourage the following
Preservation of desirable site characteristics and open space and protection of sensitive
environmental features including steep slopes mature trees creeks wetlands lakes and
scenic views
Analysis This plan has not been designed with greater preservation sensitivity than
would be required for a more standard zoning district The proposal meets the minimum
requirement for preservation which is required in any district The site plan includes
extensive grading resulting in the elimination of the existing trees canopy except for the
area within the protected wetland and upland preservation area The retaining wall on
the west side of the site has been moved to the minimum required setback which does
not provide greater protection of the natural resources one would expect of a PUD
2 More efficient and effective use of land open space and public facilities through mixing
of land uses and assembly and development of land in larger parcels
211
Walmart Concept Planned Unit Development
November 28 2011
Page 6 of 20
Analysis This plan has not been designed with greater sensitivity than would be required
for a more standard zoning district The proposal meets only the minimum requirements
of development which is required in any district
3 High quality design and design compatibility with surrounding land uses including both
existing and planned Site planning landscaping and building architecture should reflect
higher quality design than is found elsewhere in the community
Analysis The site plan and the design of the building does not meet the standards of
Chapter 20 Article XXIII Division 7 Design Standards for Commercial Industrial and
Office Development District The PUD calls for a higher standard than is found
elsewhere in the community The site plan is deficient in the following ways
The architecture does not meet the 50 percent favade transparency requirement
The proposed development meets the minimum requirements for interior landscaping
but does not provide t adequate distribution of green space
The net effect of this proposed plan including the use of compact stalls and using a
reduced parking ratio will have an effective parking standard of 3 17 spaces per
thousand square feet This is ten percent below city ordinance requirement of 5 spaces
per thousand square feet or 586 parking stalls
The design of the loading berths does not comply with the city code in the following
ways
1 Location The berths are not separated from alls used for off street parking
2 Access The loading berths interfere with vehicular access because truck
maneuvering encroaches into required parking drive aisles
3 Design Truck circulation encroaches and blocks required parking drive isles
and pedestrian access
4 Sensitive development in transitional areas located between different land uses and along
significant corridors within the city will be encouraged
Analysis This plan has not been designed with greater sensitivity than would be required
for a more standard zoning district The proposal meets the minimum requirements of
development which is required in any district
5 Development which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
Analysis The subject site is guided Office Industrial and Commercial The development
is consistent with the comprehensive plan for commercial use
212
Walmart Concept Planned Unit Development
November 28 2011
Page 7 of 20
6 Parks and open space The creation of public open space may be required by the city
Such park and open space shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Park Plan and
overall trail plan
Analysis An additional level ofprotection and preservation of the environmentally
sensitive areas and natural resources has not been provided
7 Provision of housing affordable to all income groups if appropriate with the PUD
Analysis Not applicable to this proposal
8 Energy conservation through the use of more efficient building designs and siting and the
clustering of buildings and land uses
Analysis Sustainability elements Walmart implements in their building construction
are
Central Energy Management System to monitor and control heating air
conditioning refrigeration and lighting
Daylight Harvesting reducing the electric lighting energy consumption up to 75
LED Technology providing up to 52 more efficiency than traditional fluorescent
illumination
White Roofs reducing the heat island effect with higher reflectivity and emissivity
factors
Non Ozone Depleting Refrigerants Heat Reclamation utilizing the waste heat from
on site refrigeration to supply hot water needs
High Efficiency Faucets and Urinals yielding a 75 reduction in water usage
Recycled Content Requirements specifying construction materials containing waste
products
Low Emitting Materials specifying interior adhesives sealants paints and carpet
systems with low VOC content
Waste Management Procedures seeking to recycle reuse or salvage non hazardous
waste generated by the Work and to eliminate or minimize the amount of waste going
to landfills
9 Use of traffic management and design techniques to reduce the potential for traffic
conflicts Improvements to area roads and intersections may be required as appropriate
213
Walmart Concept Planned Unit Development
November 28 2011
Page 8 of 20
Analysis Walmart has agreed to finance the costs of all of the recommended off site
traffic improvements that were listed in the November I st staff report
An additional left turn lane for westbound Highway S to southbound Powers
Boulevard needs to be constructed
The existing left turn signal on Highway S needs to be re timed for westbound
Highway S to southbound Powers Boulevard
An additional left turn lane for northbound Powers Boulevard to westbound Highway
S needs to be constructed
Installation of a traffic control signal at the intersection of Powers Boulevard and
Park Road
Increase the length of the left turn on northbound Powers Boulevard to westbound
Highway S
Installation of turn lanes and a raised median within Park Road
However traffic management and potential for traffic conflict still exists on the site
which includes
The traffic turning movement and traffic counts for the developer s traffic impact
report were taken in February 2011 Staff does not feel these counts are a good
representation of the traffic counts in the area and are estimated to be 28 low
Potential high U turning movements Many vehicles using the right out at the
eastern access will want to go to Powers Boulevard
Potential weaving issue between vehicles making a right turn out of the east access
and vehicles making the right turn into the west access
The proposed site plan has essentially only I access points since the east access is
only a right in right out which is minimal for the size of retail facility being proposed
Truck delivery access is proposed to use the same accesses as the shoppers
The truck turning movements in the parking lot are minimal and could be a problem
especially during higher shopping times during the year and during the winter when
some parking spaces are reduced with snow
Proposed turn lane taper is too close to Powers Boulevard
Stacking concern Each turn lane could accommodate one vehicle Beyond the turn
lane there is only stacking for two additional vehicles
214
Walmart Concept Planned Unit Development
November 28 2011
Page 9 of 20
PUD Standards
Sec 20 504 Coordination with other zoning regulations
The development must comply with Article II Division 6 of Chapter 20 addressing Site Plan
Review as well as Articles V VI and VII Floodplain Wetland and Shoreland District
Sec 20 505 Required general standards
Standards and purposes of the comprehensive land use plan to coordinate between the
proposed development and the surrounding use
Location of buildings compatibility parking areas and other features with response to the
topography of the area and existing natural features the efficiency adequacy and safety of
the proposed layout of streets the adequacy and location of green areas the adequacy
location and screening of non compatible land uses and parking areas
The applicant shall demonstrate that the PUD plan offers the city higher quality architectural
and site design landscaping protection of wetlands creeks and mature trees and buffering
for adjoining properties that represent improvements over normal ordinance standards
Hard surface coverage shall be limited as follows commercial or industrial is 70 percent
Building and parking setbacks from public streets shall be determined by the city based on
characteristics of the specific PUD Parking lots and driving lanes shall be set back at least
20 feet from all exterior lot lines of a PUD
PUDs must be developed in compliance with buffer yard requirements established by the
Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 20 Article XXV of the Chanhassen City Code
Signs shall be restricted to those which are permitted in the sign plan approved by the city
and shall be regulated by permanent covenants or design standards established in the PUD
development contract
The requirements contained in articles XXIII Supplementary Regulations Design Standards
and XXV Landscaping and Tree Removal of this chapter may be applied by the city as it
deems appropriate
The uniqueness of each PUD required that specifications and standards for streets utilities
public facilities and subdivisions may be subject to modification from the city ordinances
ordinarily governing them The city council may therefore approve streets utilities public
facilities and land subdivisions which are not in compliance with usual specifications or
ordinance requirements if it finds that strict adherence to such standards or requirements is
not required to meet the intent of this article or to protect the health safety or welfare of the
residents of the PUD the surrounding area or the city as a whole
215
Walmart Concept Planned Unit Development
November 28 2011
Page 10 of 20
ANALYSIS OF PUD STANDARDS
Architectural Compliance
City code requires that developments comply with certain minimum requirements These
requirements are outlined below
Chapter 20 Article XXIII Division 7 Design Standards for Commercial Industrial and Office
Development District
Size Portion and Placement
Entries The entire front fagade has received additional architectural treatment The building
has a pronounced entrance with a canopy over the front the entrance The main canopy has been
extended over other sections of the building There are recesses and projections surrounding the
front entrance and display windows The front fagade windows have awnings
Articulation Facades on the remaining three sides have been revised to incorporate elements
such as canopies awnings and brick columns These revisions meet the minimum requirements
of the city design criteria
Signs The sign in the north east corner has been replaced with a monument sign No details
have been provided
Material and Detail
The materials on the building include EFIS and precast panels Tilt up panels that are grid or
brick like in appearance are required EFIS can only be used as accent material and may occupy
up to 15 percent of the buildings facades Additional brick has been added These revisions
meet the minimum requirements of the city design criteria
Color
The building color is tan and browns consistent with the requirements of the ordinance
Height and Roof Design
The tallest part of the building is the front entry which is 35 feet The building meets the height
requirement All rooftop equipment must be screened It appears that there is a parapet wall but
there is not enough information to determine screening compliance especially since Highway 5
has a higher elevation than the building
Facade Transparency
All facades viewed by the public must contain 50 percent windows and doors All facades that
have visibility from the public must meet this requirement The front or the southern side meets
the transparency requirements Spandrel glass windows have been added to the most southerly
216
Walmart Concept Planned Unit Development
November 28 2011
Page 11 of 20
portion on the west side of the building The view from Highway 5 and Powers Boulevard
however still does not meet the 50 percent transparency requirement The building design does
not meet the requirement
Loadiniz Areas Refuse Areas etc
Refuse is located in the rear of the building with screening In addition there is a recycling area
that is adjacent to the northern retaining wall
There are three loading berths found in two truck wells These loading berths are found on the
north side of the building The design of the loading berths does not comply with the city code
in the following ways
1 Location All berths beyond one shall be separate from areas used for off street parking
The berths are not separated from alls used for off street parking
2 Access Each required off street parking berth shall be so designed as to avoid
interference with other vehicular pedestrian or rail access or use of public street alleys or
other public transportation systems
The loading berths interfere with vehicular access because truck maneuvering
encroaches into required parking drive aisles
3 Design All loading areas shall consist of a maneuvering area in addition to the berth and
shall not use any of that portion of the site containing parking stalls Maneuvering areas
shall be of such size to permit the backing of truck tractors and coupled trailers into a
berth without blocking the use of other berths drives maneuvering areas or public right
of way
Truck circulation encroaches and blocks required parking drive isles and pedestrian
access
Parkins
The 528 parking spaces provided do not meet the city code for ratio of required 5 stalls per 1 000
square feet of building Based on an 117 278 square foot building 586 stalls are required
The applicant has provided a parking study that they believe demonstrates that Walmart needs
only 4 5 stalls per 1 000 However their recommended ratio excludes the factor of snow storage
and effective parking supply The study defines effective parking supply as the number of
occupied spaces at optimum operating efficiency Parking lots are typically perceived as full at
less than the actual total capacity Kimley Horn Study dated March 32 2011 The study also
states that snow storage may have a significant effect on usable parking supply for three to five
months out of the year The parking ratio recommended in the study does not accommodate
snow storage or effective parking The net effect of this proposed plan including the use of
compact stalls and using a reduced parking ratio will have an effective parking standard of 3 17
spaces per thousand This is well below city ordinance
217
Walmart Concept Planned Unit Development
November 28 2011
Page 12 of 20
The parking provided takes advantage of 19 percent compact parking stalls City code allows
up to 25 percent compact parking however these compact stalls are not permitted for high
turnover parking lots Retail use is a high turnover parking operation In addition compact
stalls are partially located within the loading and maneuvering area which is prohibited by city
code
SITE PLAN REVIEW
Roadways
The property lies south of Highway 5 west of Powers Boulevard and north of Park Road
Highway 5 and Powers Boulevard are classified as Minor Arterials in the City s Transportation
Plan and are under the jurisdiction of the Minnesota Department of Transportation and Carver
County respectively Park Road is a city street and is classified as a Major Collector roadway
The developer performed a Traffic Impact Analysis to estimate the impact the proposed Walmart
store would have on the roadway system The analysis assumes that trips to the site will
distributed as shown in Figure 1
1
W 76TF TRtET
HIGHWAY S 0
O
5e y
PARK ROAD
a
3
0
a
Figure 1 Anticipated traffic distribution to the proposed development
218
Walmart Concept Planned Unit Development
November 28 2011
Page 13 of 20
The analysis included the existing traffic volumes and estimated growth to the year 2030 due to
residential commercial and industrial growth within the area The analysis focused on the peak
PM volumes since this will likely be time that has the highest impact to traffic The additional
PM trips generated each hour to the proposed store are shown in Figure 2
T T 8TREET
30
142
PARK ROAD
43
O
J m
of
Figure 2 Additional PM peak hour trips generated by the proposed development
The peak PM hour traffic to the site will include pass by trips meaning vehicles that are
already travelling in a particular direction will stop at the site then continue to their ultimate
destination Figure 3 shows the projected peak PM hour traffic volumes to the site for years
2013 2030
219
Walmart Concept Planned Unit Development
November 28 2011
Page 14 of 20
ST 71 ITI I STREET
HI GHWAYS 225 328
rl 2441374
SEa
r
2781324
PARK ROAD
118H31
m
a
Figure 3 Anticipated peak PM hour traffic volumes to the site 2013 2030
The developer s engineer estimates that the proposed Walmart will generate 5 300 trips to the
site which is broken down as follows
Powers Boulevard north of Park Road 3 869
Powers Boulevard south of Park Road 1 431
Park Road east of store entrance 5 035
Park Road west of store entrance 265
The traffic turning movement and traffic counts for the developer s traffic impact report were
taken in February 2011 Staff does not feel these counts are a good representation of the traffic
counts in the area and are estimated to be 28 low However staff has made some assumptions
on traffic counts and included this information with the 2030 estimated traffic based on the
Carver County traffic model The following roadway improvements have been recommended
based on the projected traffic volumes identified in the Traffic Impact Analysis and Carver
County and MnDOT reviews
An additional left turn lane for west bound Highway 5 to south bound Powers Boulevard
needs to be constructed
2 The existing left turn signal on Highway 5 needs to be retimed for west bound Highway
5 to south bound Powers Boulevard
220
Walmart Concept Planned Unit Development
November 28 2011
Page 15 of 20
3 An additional left turn lane for north bound Powers Boulevard to west bound Highway 5
needs to be constructed
4 Installation of a traffic control signal at the intersection of Powers Boulevard and Park
Road
5 Increase the length of the left turn on north bound Powers Boulevard to west bound
Highway 5 and
6 Installation of turn lanes and a raised median within Park Road
These improvements are not identified in MnDOT s Carver County s or the City s 5 Year
Capital Improvement Plan therefore the developer should make these improvements if the
development is approved Based on the developer s preliminary drawings these improvements
can be constructed within the existing right of ways
These improvements are based on traffic modeling assumptions added to the developer s traffic
impact study The traffic impact study should be updated to identify the true turning movements
in the area during a better representative time period preferably during the summer months
Site Access
The site currently has two access points on Park Road The proposed access points are shown in
yellow in Figure 4 A comparison of the existing and proposed access points as compared to the
City Code requirements is shown in Table 1
G
IM
42 27 W
Figure 4 Existing and proposed accesses Dimensions to existing conditions shown in white Proposcd condition shown in
yellow
Table 1 Access Spacing Comparisons
PA AK ROAD
Proposed Minimum Required per
Condition Condition Comprehensive Plan
Distance from Eastern
Figure 4 Existing and proposed accesses Dimensions to existing conditions shown in white Proposcd condition shown in
yellow
Table 1 Access Spacing Comparisons
Existing Proposed Minimum Required per
Condition Condition Comprehensive Plan
Distance from Eastern 170 ft 230 ft 220 ft Access to Powers Boulevard
Distance Between Eastern
and Western Access 290 ft 200 ft 200 ft
221
Walmart Concept Planned Unit Development
November 28 2011
Page 16 of 20
Access spacing from an adjacent street in this instance Powers Boulevard is intended to
provide drivers sufficient distance to travel past an intersection before making a turn and to
provided sufficient stacking distance for vehicles turning in to the access Adequate distance
between access points is required for similar reasons Access spacing requirements consider the
classification of streets and the land use of the property spacing for a commercial property along
a high volume road is greater than that for a private residence on a low volume road Figure 5
illustrates Staffs concerns with the proposed access points and associated roadway
modifications
Figure 5 Staff concerns with accesses and proposed modifications to Park Road
The proposed site plan has essentially only 1 2 access points since the east access is only a right
in right out which is minimal for the size of retail facility being proposed Truck delivery access
is proposed to use the same accesses as the shoppers Normally delivery trucks should have a
separate access point or at a minimum restrict parking as much as possible in the delivery truck
driving areas This is the case with the Chanhassen Target and Byerly s stores The proposed
delivery truck route is to have the delivery trucks come into the site at the west access point
travel around the store on the north side and exit through the parking lot on the east side The
truck turning movements in the parking lot are minimal and could be a problem especially during
Potential high u turning
movements Many i
vehicles using the Potential weaving right out at the issue between
eastern access will vehicles making a want to go to Powers y r a right turn out of Boulevard A 1 the east access and
vehicles making
the right turn into
the west access
I r
PARK ROAD l ei
1
Figure 5 Staff concerns with accesses and proposed modifications to Park Road
The proposed site plan has essentially only 1 2 access points since the east access is only a right
in right out which is minimal for the size of retail facility being proposed Truck delivery access
is proposed to use the same accesses as the shoppers Normally delivery trucks should have a
separate access point or at a minimum restrict parking as much as possible in the delivery truck
driving areas This is the case with the Chanhassen Target and Byerly s stores The proposed
delivery truck route is to have the delivery trucks come into the site at the west access point
travel around the store on the north side and exit through the parking lot on the east side The
truck turning movements in the parking lot are minimal and could be a problem especially during
222
Walmart Concept Planned Unit Development
November 28 2011
Page 17 of 20
higher shopping times during the year and during the winter when some parking spaces are
reduced with snow Some of these potential delivery truck vehicle parking conflicts can be
minimized with late delivery hours however this facility is proposed to be open 24 hours
Staff looked at aerials of more than 60 big box retail sites in the metro area Staff found two
sites that have only two access points the remaining sites had three or more accesses There is
approximately 310 feet between the accesses on Site A where both accesses are on the same
street Neither access to Site A are close to an intersecting street The accesses to Site B are
on different streets neither are close to an intersecting street At this point staff has not found a
big box retail site within the metro that has similar access issues as the concept plan submitted to
the city
74
IY 1 1 1 1
r j jtv Vii 1 n
ire
i IL e CIM MtN1Y
Parking is currently restricted on the north side of Park Road The proposed modifications to
Park Road would require that the south side of Park Road be a No Parking area as well
Employees of the IWCO property currently park on the south side of Park Road The
developer s engineer has discussed the proposed median on Park Road and the potential on street
parking restriction with the owners of the IWCO property
Some of the vegetation on the west side of the site would have to be trimmed or removed in
order to ensure adequate sight distance at the west access
Grading
The concept plan identifies the proposed finished floor elevation of the store to be 931 which is
approximately nine feet lower than the ground elevation on the east side of the building The
concept plan includes retaining walls on the west north and east sides of the property The
developer s engineer has indicated that the maximum height of the retaining walls are
approximately 12 feet on the west side 16 5 feet on the north side and 16 5 feet on the east side
Figure 6 Big box retail Site A with two
accesses on the same street
Figure 7 Big box retail Site B with two
accesses on two different streets
223
Walmart Concept Planned Unit Development
November 28 2011
Page 18 of 20
Portions of the proposed wall encroach into the existing drainage and utility easement
Utilities
Public water and sanitary sewer is available to the property If the project proceeds a utility plan
must be submitted showing the existing and proposed services to the property
NATURAL RESOURCES
Shoreland Management Rules
This site lies within the Shoreline Management District for Riley Creek a known impaired
water Riley Creek flows through the western portion of the subject property Minnesota Rules
Chapter 6120 describes how land can be developed within a Shoreland District as well as
specific criteria applicable to a Planned Unit Development The applicant will need to meet these
criteria and provide evidence that they are met It cannot be determined if these are met based
upon the information provided
Water Quality
This site is tributary to two surface waters that are included on the Federal Clean Water Act 303d
list Riley Creek is impaired for aquatic habitat with turbidity the identified pollutant Lake
Susan is impaired for aquatic recreation with nutrients as the identified pollutant Because of
these impairments both waters are considered Improve 1 Surface Waters per Chanhassen s
Second Generation Surface Water Management Plan SWMP The stated goal of Improve 1
waters is to improve the existing water quality trend To this end water must be treated to
greater than NURP standards and must assure that rates to and within Riley Creek do not
increase
The applicant will need to comply with the requirements of the MPCA Permit No MN R 10000 1
General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity
Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination NPDES Construction Permit and in
particular Appendix A Upon review of the memo they do not meet the requirement that one
half inch of water quality volume from new impervious surface is infiltrated in that they are
using filtration exclusively While this is allowed if conditions do not allow for infiltration the
soil survey shows that a considerable portion of the site is dominated by Lester Kilkenny which
is a well drained soil in the hydrologic soil group B and all of the site to be improved is of the
hydrologic soil group C or B The only time when infiltration is expressly not required under
Appendix A of the permit is when the soils are hydrologic soil group D contaminated or with
less than three feet of separation to groundwater
The site is proposed to have a significant increase in hardcover with a corresponding loss in
vegetative cover including mature shade trees Stormwater treatment would need to occur
underneath the parking lot This system would need to be under private management since this
is a system that the city does not maintain
224
Walmart Concept Planned Unit Development
November 28 2011
Page 19 of 20
Riley Creek is located on the property and Lake Susan is within one half mile of the subject
property The close proximity of these two waters severely limits other opportunities to achieve
the water quality goals
Wetlands and Buffer Areas
There exists a large riparian wetland on the property This wetland is currently classified as
Manage 2 in the SWMP A Manage 2 wetland requires 20 foot buffers and a 30 foot setback
from this buffer A retaining wall is located right at the minimum of the required wetland and
buffer setback Given that this is a planned unit development the City should expect an
additional level of protection and preservation of environmentally sensitive areas and natural
resources
This wall will limit the functions and values of the wetland as an ecological feature for both plant
and animal habitat Edge features often promote the establishment of invasive plant species at
the expense of a diversity of native plants Further this wall will act to fragment the area from
the east and eliminate any associated upland habitat
Landscaping
The proposed development plan meets the minimum required interior landscape area 20 238
square feet required 22 076 square feet provided and minimum required number of islands and
peninsulas 42 required 44 provided A shift in the locations of the islands and peninsulas may
be required to provide adequate distribution of green space throughout the vehicular use area
The islands and peninsulas shown will need to meet minimum requirements for interior width
The quantity of trees required is based on the amount of vehicular use required landscape area
and the minimum number required will be 81 trees in addition to the bufferyard plantings The
applicant has submitted a revised landscaping plan Additional issues for the development
include incorporating foundation landscaping in the form of planters trees and green space
along store perimeter locating bufferyard plantings around the north east and south sides of the
property using native landscaping along the west side of the property in order to restore and
enhance the native vegetation and considering pervious hard surfaces in lesser used parking lot
areas
Building Review
1 Structure must comply with Minnesota State Building Code
2 The structure is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system
3 Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of
Minnesota
4 Retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit
must be obtained prior to construction
225
Walmart Concept Planned Unit Development
November 28 2011
Page 20 of 20
5 Detailed occupancy related requirements will be addressed when complete building plans are
submitted
6 The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as
possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures
RECOMMENDATION
The request to rezone to PUD does not meet the intent or general standards for a PUD therefore
staff recommends that the City Council direct staff to prepare Findings of Fact for Denial of the
Concept Planned Unit Development
ATTACHMENTS
1 Chanhassen City Code Chapter 20 Zoning Article XVIII A CC Community
Commercial District
2 Industrial Commercial Comparison
3 Development Review Application
4 Response letter for Concept Staff Report dated 11 21 11
5 Revised Preliminary Site Plan 2 dated 11 18 11
6 Revised Building Elevations and Perspectives dated 11 21 11
7 Natural Resources and Wetland and Upland Preservation Area
8 Letter from Tod Sherman of MnDOT dated 8 11 11
9 Letter from Kate Miner of Carver County Public Works dated 8 19 11
10 Parking Study prepared by Kimley Horn and Assoc dated 3 2 11
11 Improvement Exhibits Park Road and Highway 5 and County Road 17
12 Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Kimley Horn and Assoc dated 5 20 2011
13 Preliminary Drainage Analysis dated 11 21 11
14 Affidavit of Mailing Notice of Public Hearing
15 Letter from IWCO dated 11 21 11
16 Emails from residents
17 Resident Petition submitted at Planning Commission Meeting 11 1 11
gAplan 2011 planning cases 11 11 walmart store concept pud cc staff report I doc
226
Municode Page 1 of 2
Attachment I
Chanhassen Minnesota Code of Ordinances CITY CODE Chapter 20 ZONING ARTICLE
XVIII A CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
I ARTICLE XVIII A CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
Sec 20 741 Intent
Sec 20 742 Permitted uses
Sec 20 743 Permitted accessory uses
Sec 20 744 Conditional use
Sec 20 745 Lot requirements and setbacks
Secs 20 746 20 750 Reserved
Sec 20 741 Intent
a
The intent of the community commercial district is to provide for moderate to large sized commercial development
These large scale commercial and office users need high visibility along arterial roads While smaller scale
ancillary commercial uses may be permitted integral to the principal use the primary use of a building shall be
medium to large type users with a minimum tenant space of 15 000 square feet The intent of the district is to
accommodate larger uses The creation of multi tenant small user strip centers is prohibited
b
Location criteria for community commercial uses are Access to arterial and collector streets preferably at
intersections with collector and arterial streets moderate to large sized sites public water and sewer service
environmental features such as soils and topography suitable for compact development and adequate buffering by physical features or adjacent uses to protect nearby residential development
c
The total building area on a single level or floor for an individual use shall be no more than 65 000 square feet
Ord No 487 1 11 23 09
Sec 20 742 Permitted uses
Arts and crafts supply store
Automotive parts and accessories
Book store
Building supply center
Consumer electronics and appliance store
Drugstore
Furniture and home furnishings
Garden center
Grocery store
Health and dental clinics
Hobby toy and game stores
Office
Office equipment and supply
Personal services
Sewing and fabric store
Sporting goods
Ord No 487 1 11 23 09
Sec 20 743 Permitted accessory uses
Antennas
Automatic teller machines ATMs
http library municode com print aspx chentID 14048 HTMRequest http 3 a 2f o2fl 10 24 2011 227
Municode
Parking lots and ramps
Signs
Utility services
Ord No 487 1 11 23 09
Sec 20 744 Conditional use
Screened outdoor storage
Ord No 487 1 11 23 09
Sec 20 745 Lot requirements and setbacks
Minimum lot area One acre
Minimum lot depth 100 feet
Minimum lot frontage 100 feet
Maximum lot coverage 70 percent
Maximum building height Four stories 50 feet
Setbacks Building parking
Front 25 feet
Side 10 feet
Rear 10 feet
Parking setback exemptions
Page 2 of 2
There is no minimum setback when it abuts without being separated by a street another off street
parking area
Parking setbacks may be reduced to ten feet along public streets if the applicant can demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the city that 100 percent screening is provided at least five feet above the adjacent
parking lot
Ord No 487 1 11 23 09
Secs 20 746 20 750 Reserved
http library municode comlprint aspx clientID 14048 HTMRequest http 3 a 2fti o2fl 10 24 2011 228
Attachment 2
Industrial Commercial Comparison
Target ISTAR MN LLC
Acerage gross 10 08 14 1
Building sq ft 130 110 154 674
2011 Total Market Value 10 095 600 5 167 000
2011 Total Tax 350 044 208 394
229
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard P O Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317 952 227 1100
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION SE P 3 0 2011
CHANHASSFN PI ACNING nFV
PLLASk PRINT
Applicant Name and Address
Walmart c o Kimley Horn and Assoc
2550 University Ave W Suite 238N
St Paul MN 55114
Contact William D Matzek
Phone 643 0497 Fax 645 4197
Email Will Matzek @Ki mleY Horn com
Property Owner Name and Address
iStar Minnesota LLC c o iStar Financial I
1114 Av enue of the Americas 27th Floor
New York New York 10036
Contact
Phone Fax
Email
NOTE Consultation with City staff is reauired prior to submittal including review of development plans
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Conditional Use Permit CUP
Interim Use Permit IUP
Non conforming Use Permit
X Planned Unit Development 750
Rezoning
Sign Permits
Sign Plan Review
Site Plan Review SPR
Subdivision
Temporary Sales Permit
Vacation of Right of Way Easements VAC Additional recording fees may apply
Variance VAR
Wetland Alteration Permit WAP
Zoning Appeal
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Notification Sign 200
City to install and remove
An additional fee of 3 00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing
Five 5 full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted including an 8 X 11 reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF Group 4 tif format
Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract
Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews
NOTE When multiple applications are processed the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application
X Escrow for Filing Fees Attorney Cost
50 CUP SPRNACNAR WAP Metes Bounds
450 Minor SUB ICS tey Norn TOTAL FEE 95Q 00 CK A ltt3a
Planning Case No I I I II
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
RECEIVED
230
PROJECT NAME Wglmart Store 5949 00
LOCATION 1000 Park Road Chanhassen MN 55317
LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PID Lot 1 Block 1 of the Park Two 2nd Addition Plat
PIN 255660010
TOTAL ACREAGE 14 10 ACRES
WETLANDS PRESENT X YES NO
PRESENT ZONING IOP industrial Office Park District
REQUESTED ZONING PUD Planned Unit Development
PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION Industrial office Community Cnmme c1al
REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION Commercial
REASON FOR REQUEST The t pose this 4pplicatio s to request A PUD in order to S
develop an a rgAp0ply 120 000 SF retail building on said property The proposed
development has been prepared in accordance with the City of Cttenh s Code of
Ordinances
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Include number of existiM employees and new employees
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information
and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions Before tiling this application you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal A written notice of application deficiencies shall be matted to the applicant within 15 business days of application
This is to certify that f am making application for the described action by the City and that t am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application I have attached a copy of proof of ownership either copy of Owner s Duplicate Certificate of Title Abstract of Tide or purchase agreement or f am the authorized person
to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application
1 will keep myself Informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees feasibility studies etc with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study The documents and information 1 have submitted are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge
r
Signature of Applicant Date
Z 7 C pz z 0gs rALLA z42 d
Si7re of Fee Owner Date
g yden rnntaklcvelopnxnl ttvk v RMication doc
231
November 21 2011
Kathryn R Aanenson AICP
Community Development Director
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Blvd
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
RE Response Letter for Conceptual PUD Staff Report
Proposed Walmart 1000 Park Road
Dear Ms Aanenson
Suite 238N
2550 University Avenue West
St Paul Minnesota
55114
In response to the November 1 2011 Staff Report recommendations from the Planning
Commission and from residents the Walmart development team has revised our
proposed Site and Building Plans In the pages that follow we respond to concerns
raised by the community and in the Staff Report and also offer a brief explanation of our
revisions
The Site is currently a vacant industrial building Retail development at the Site is
consistent with the City s Comprehensive Plan The Site s unique features present
challenges that would be best addressed through the flexibility afforded through a
Planned Unit Development PUD We understand that in exchange for the
development flexibility available through a PUD the City expects that the development
will be of higher quality We believe that our revised development meets that goal
Walmart has agreed to finance the costs of all of the recommended off site
traffic improvements that were listed in the November 1 staff report These
traffic improvements will not only relieve traffic concerns related to Walmart
but will also serve the anticipated future growth of Chanhassen through 2030
The building s fagade not only exceeds code requirements but has been
considerably upgraded The building is smaller than the most common layout
of new Walmart stores Drive throughs and the garden center have been
eliminated
o Landscaping pedestrian and Site amenities have been enhanced the typical
pylon sign along Highway 5 has been replaced with a decorative monument
sign planters and benches have been added to soften the building s front
232
entrances proposed interior landscaping exceeds City requirements and the
addition of over 180 new trees on Site will increase the tree canopy from 14
in the existing condition to 39 for the proposed Site A new sidewalk along
Powers Boulevard is proposed together with a pedestrian staircase at Powers
and Highway 5
o The redevelopment will exceed storm water treatment requirements and will
increase the quality of the water discharged into adjacent creeks and wetlands
o To further protect the wetlands and creek on Site Walmart proposes that these
areas approximately one quarter of the Site be protected for the future with
a permanent conservation easement Walmart proposes eradicating invasive
plant species from the wetland buffer areas The buffer areas have been
increased
o To help achieve some of the benefits described above Walmart proposes to
shrink the size of its parking lot First the width of the stalls has been
narrowed to 9 feet to match City ordinances Secondly there aren t as many
stalls Although the parking ratio is less than the City requires in a
typical non PUD development our parking study shows that even on Black
Friday the busiest shopping day of the year there will be 79 extra parking
stalls at the Site
o Walmart s building will use the latest green technology skylights will be
interlocked with the interior building lighting system super high energy
efficient HVAC units will be installed together with Central Energy
Management heat reclaimed from refrigeration systems will be used to heat
the water used in the store and LED lighting will be used in the parking lot
for signs and in the refrigeration cases Walmart has an aggressive recycling
program that is used not only after the store is open but also during
construction There are many more items that will be included in this store
that will make it one of the most up to date buildings in the State of Minnesota
as far as green technology
The Walmart team appreciates the opportunity to work with the City of Chanhassen on
the proposed development and we ask that the City Council approve the conceptual PUD
With conceptual PUD approval in hand we will next work on preparing final PUD plans
and look forward to refining our plans to meet the City s requirements and goals Feel
free to contact us should you have any questions or would like further information
Sincerely
L I
William D Matzek PE CPESC
Kimley Horn and Associates Inc
Chanhassen Walmart
Concept PUD
2
233
Walmart Chanhassen MN
Concept Planned Unit Development
Revised Plans November 21 2011
ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE
The November 1S Staff Report describes the extent to which the original design met standards
for commercial industrial and office developments under the City Code In response SAIC has
proposed new elevations for the proposed building The new elevations show planters and
benches for seating have been added across the front of the building Material changes have also
been made to the front of the building to provide a more significant upgrade Additional exterior
building features such as canopies window groupings changes in color and changes in parapet
height have been added to meet the zoning code s requirement that building expanses of more
than 40 feet in width be divided into smaller increments with either fayade modulation vertical
divisions using different materials or variation in the roof line
The pylon sign has been redesigned to a monument sign offering more architectural interest The
sign area will not exceed 80 square feet Materials for the monument sign will match those being
used on the building In addition a decorative feature has been added that mirrors the City of
Chanhassen s signature decorative maple leaf
The building s pre cast panels will be integrally colored and will have a grid system as well as a
pebble texture The use of EIFS has been limited to accent areas only mostly on the front of
the building The large EIFS area on the rear of the building shown in the original plans has
been replaced with TRESPA panels similar to the front signage area In addition the integral
colored split face block has been replaced with Quik Brik in several earthtone colors to provide a
more significant upgrade We have added additional spandrel glass window areas and areas with
suspended awnings to meet the requirement for a significant architectural upgrade to the
building The building s parapets have been raised to provide additional screening of rooftop
equipment from adjacent sidewalks
The Code requires that all facades viewed by the public must contain 50 percent windows and or
doors The revised plans show that additional architectural detailing has been added to the sides
and rear of the building SAIC has added spandrel glass window areas to the west side of the
building along with suspended canopies on all three sides The front entrance canopy has been
extended to provide more customer shelter along the front of the building Additional
articulation has been added to the sides and rear of the building through the use of extended
parapets color and material changes and changes in plane Screening materials for the loading
areas and refuse areas will be the same as those used on the building
TRAFFIC
We understand that the community is concerned about traffic generated by the new Walmart as
well as traffic that will be generated as Chanhassen continues to grow Walmart wants safe
roads around its Site and will pay for the following off site traffic improvements that were
identified by the Traffic Impact Analysis and reviewed by the City Carver County and the
Chanhassen Walmart
Concept PUD
234
Minnesota Department of Transportation These improvements are all based on the projected
traffic volumes that were identified in a Traffic Impact Analysis and included within the
November 1 Staff Report
1 Construct an additional left turn lane for westbound Highway 5 to southbound Powers
Boulevard
2 Re time the existing left turn signal on Highway 5 for westbound Highway 5 to
southbound Powers Boulevard
3 Construct an additional left turn lane for northbound Powers Boulevard to westbound
Highway 5
4 Install a traffic control signal at the intersection of Powers Boulevard and Park Road
5 Increase the length of the left turn on northbound Powers Boulevard to westbound
Highway 5
6 Install turn lanes and a raised median within Park Road
We understand that none of the above improvements are included in the City s Five Year Capital
Improvement Plan and Walmart has agreed to make these improvements at its cost if the
development is approved
PARKING
Walmart prefers to build only the number of parking stalls needed for a store and has been
looking for ways to shrink its parking lots in part in recognition of the environmental impacts
from large parking lots Prior to our original submittal we prepared a parking study for this Site
based upon other area Walmarts and determined that the Store would need 528 parking stalls
This will result in a 4 5 parking ratio which will fall short of the City Code s requirement of 5 0
stalls per 1 000 square feet of building area The proposed 528 stalls includes a 15
contingency factor such that even on the busiest shopping day of the year Black Friday it is
anticipated that there will still be an excess of 79 stalls in the parking field The revised Site
Plan provides the number of stalls required by the parking study and the revised Site Plan
reduces the number of compact stalls from 25 to 18 6 We ask that the smaller parking lot
be approved as part of the concept PUD approval
SITE ACCESS
The Site has two access points on Park Road The revised Site Plan shows that the eastern
access drive has been shifted 50 feet to the west and now exceeds City spacing requirements In
addition the turn lane taper has been moved west and the curb radius entering the Site has been
increased from 12 feet to 30 feet To address potential stacking concerns the west access has
been revised to allow for approximately 150 feet of stacking 20 feet greater than the stacking
distance recommended in the Traffic Impact Assessment Additional stacking has also been
provided at the east access that also exceeds the required stacking that the Traffic Impact
Assessment recommended
Staff was concerned about potential U turn movements many vehicles using the right out at
the eastern access may want to go to Powers Boulevard The Traffic Impact Assessment projects
that only 4 vehicles per hour are anticipated to use the right out at the eastern access To
mitigate the potential for U turns the median on Park Road will include No U turn signs The
Chanhassen Walmart
Concept PUD
4
235
median and lane configurations for the proposed Site also appear to be similar in nature to the
intersection of County Road 117 and West 78th Street which is also located in a commercial
area The Staff Report identified a potential weaving issue between vehicles making a right turn
out of the east access and vehicles making the right turn in to the west access Due to the low
volume of drivers projected to make the right turn movements 4 vehicles per hour weaving is
not anticipated to be an issue for this Site
Staff looked at aerials of more than 60 big box retail sites in the metro area and found two sites
that have only two access points the remaining sites had three or more accesses Every retail
Site is different based upon the proposed retail use size property configuration and natural
features surrounding streets and corresponding traffic In the case of Chanhassen the Traffic
Impact Assessment found that the proposed access configuration operates acceptably There are
many big boxes in the Twin Cities metro area as well as around the country with one or two
access points Some examples in the Metro include Costco in Eden Prairie Best Buy in Eden
Prairie Target in Vadnais Heights Super Target in St Louis Park Sam s Club in Bloomington
Home Depot in Bloomington Gander Mountain in Woodbury Fleet Farm in Oakdale and the
Target in Chaska Additionally we used the vehicle modeling program Auto Turn to model the
proposed truck route and found that truck traffic will not impede proposed vehicular parking
areas
The Staff Report notes that parking is currently restricted on the north side of Park Road The
proposed modifications to Park Road will require that the south side of Park Road be a No
Parking area as well Employees of the IWCO property currently park on the south side of Park
Road We have discussed the proposed median on Park Road and the potential on street parking
restriction with the owners of IWCO and believe that IWCO supports the project including the
impacts to parking on Park Road
Finally as to concerns about the west access drive s possible impacts to the vegetation on the
western portions of the Site please note that the proposed access location matches existing
conditions To improve sight distance some of the existing sumac bushes will require removal
or trimming but no significant trees are anticipated to require removal to improve sight lines
GRADING
The updated Site Plan increases the finish floor elevation to 932 feet and reduces the retaining
wall heights on the west side of the Site to a maximum height of approximately 12 feet rather
than 21 5 feet which was proposed in the original plans Note that the proposed retaining walls
are all outside of the existing drainage and utility easement
WATER QUALITY STORM WATER
Under existing conditions 5 3 acres of impervious surfaces discharge storm water to the adjacent
wetlands without any treatment The proposed plan will add approximately 3 4 acres of
impervious surfaces but will incorporate storm water treatment techniques such as rain gardens
and underground storm water treatment all of which will improve the quality of the water
discharging from the Site and will exceed City requirements We are enclosing a Preliminary
Drainage Analysis for additional information
Chanhassen Walmart
Concept PUD
236
CONSERVATION AREAS WETLANDS AND BUFFER AREAS
The westerly portion of the Site will not be affected by the development This area
approximately 3 75 acres includes Riley Creek wetlands trees and natural vegetation Walmart
is willing to place the westerly portion of the Site into a permanent conservation easement to
assure that these natural features are preserved
The Staff Report raised concerns about encroachments into the required wetland buffer areas
We are grateful for the feedback and have revised the plans accordingly The revised Site Plan
now meets or exceeds the City s buffer requirements The existing wetland buffers at the Site
will be increased if the proposed development is allowed to proceed The proposed retaining
walls have been moved further to the east and are now shorter Based upon a field investigation
as part of the wetland delineation performed onsite and approved by the City Staff the existing
upland buffer adjacent to the existing parking lot contains a significant population of garlic
mustard Alliaria petiolata a non native noxious weed species that is an ecological threat to
native habitats As part of the proposed project Walmart will remove the invasive species and
plant new native species that will improve the function of the wetland buffer
As mentioned above the proposed westerly access drive matches existing conditions In order to
improve sight distance some of the existing sumac bushes will require removal or trimming but
no significant trees are anticipated to require removal Additionally no trees shading Riley
Creek will be removed as part of the project and these trees will be preserved
LANDSCAPING
The revised address the Staff Report s comments on landscaping in the following ways
Parking Lot Landscaping City Ordinances requires 8 interior landscaping in the
vehicle use area For this project 20 238 square feet of interior landscaping is required
The revised plan included within this submittal provides 22 230 square feet of interior
landscaping which exceeds City ordinances
Foundation Landscaping Planters have been added to the front of the store and
landscaping has been added to the green space along store s perimeter
Bufferyard Requirements The proposed Site Plan has been updated to provide a
minimum of 20 foot parking setback along the side and rear of the Site while maintaining
100 screening The front yard setback also exceeds the City s requirement of 25 feet
by providing a setback of at least 35 feet
Native Landscaping The revised plans do not impact the wetland area or wetland
buffers Walmart will remove the noxious weeds in the upland buffer and plant native
vegetation to improve the buffers functions
Pervious hard surfaces in parking lot The Site is comprised largely of clay and fine soils
that are not suitable for infiltration Pervious pavements are not effective under these
conditions There are many methods to treat storm water runoff and the revised plan
incorporates such storm water treatment techniques as rain gardens and underground
treatment Please see the Preliminary Drainage Analysis for additional information
Chanhassen Walmart
Concept PUD
237
NORTH
RHpyT ExcEPrloN
Mae
77
7
Ing art
0
0
7N r VA gfE
A Z CT13N 4 116N RA C 3W h a SITE PLAN NOTES
STORE05m w
N C LI OR NOR
117 278SF
it
1 1 1 1 TI I
tz
A 111 1
SITE DATA LEGEND
I OKI I fl I ll r
PA NX A F 1
1 1 A
I wa r
GOPHERSTATE CALL ONE
A LERT TO CONTRACTOR
Z
LU
Cf
LU
X CL
z LLI rn
C3
uj Ix
6040
238
Y
C C C Gig
1 V
C 1
GC 1
0 l
C 1 1 7
I C tl C I
C
0C
WETLAND DELINEATION I I 15 WETLAND SETBACK llllC iJJ
n M WETLAND BUFFER
1 C TRUCK ROUTE TYP
I CC R FENC W TYP l
1
C 1 I
25 FRONT BUFFER YARD
yI
RECVCLINGAREA
70 MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK
150 MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK
COMPACT PARKING STALLS ITVP
C A
l
Walmart
STORE 5949 00
C 1 120 NOR NOR
117 278 SF
F FC JOt
r
1 7 PYLON SIG N
T
lam 1
C
e x
1
1
NT
FROPOSEO FULL
ACCESS
SIGHT TRIANGLE
PEDESTR IAN ACCESS
10 BUFFER
100 MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK
o 50 MINIMUM
PARK ROAD PROPOSED RIGHT INI
j RIGHTOUTACCESS
I I I 1
I I
1 11 1
I ii I
I
r
PEDESTRIANACCESS
LEGEND
OVERSTORVTREE
EVERGREENTREE
SMALL DECIDUOUS TREE
ORNAMENTALTREE
SHRUSS PERENNIALS
NATWEANET MIX
TURF
C EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN
K tY1Y w IL MtK
xW i M Y C00 Ss
Walmart
SITE PLAN
CHANHASSEN MN
NOVEMBER 2011
0 35 MQ
P h l b I
Kimley Horn
and Associates Inc
239
Front Elevation
Right Elevation
Left Elevation
Walmart
From S 0 SMbms
November 21 2011
Sign 1hy Hei ght Iq It Totals Ft
Imart 2 5 1 6 1
rk 2 8 0 298 00 596 00
mar ket Ph armacy 1 1 2 6 102 58 102 58
T t 1 698 58
Rear t ieva
240
E7rJ r
I IF
ko
Walmart
f o November 21 2011
From Science to Sd N
Chanhassen MN 5949 00 Perspective
241
Walmart
7 E November 21 2011 Chanhassen MN 5949 00 Perspective 1 3
242
Walmart
i
om science to sections
November 21 2011 1 Chanhassen MN 5949 00 Perspective 4 I
243
Walmart
m November 21 2011 Chanhassen NIN D 00
From S fo Saliflon5
F Cf ElIiV E
244
Walmart
r m November 21 2011
From Samoa to So U s
Chanhassen MN 5949 00 Perspective
245
R
Legend
4
ry Site Boundary
Wetland Area
Tree Canopy to Remain
Impacted Tree Canopy
NORTH NATURAL RESOURCES
Kimley Horn and Associates Inc 0 75 150
Feet
S
t
1
N
ill 01 E
PARK ROAD
s t E
T
1
S f
f t
1 Acres of Site z
r Site 14 1
r Existing Tree Canopy 1 93 14 r Existing Tree Canopy to Remain 0 96 7
Proposed Tree Canopy Replacement 4 5 32
t
Re uired Tree Canopy per City Code 1 1 41 1 10
i Total Onsite Tree Canopy 5 46 39
Tree Canopy excludes wetland area per City Code
e Approximately 180 trees x 1 089 sfper City Code
p y Tree Canopyto Remain Proposed Tree Canopy Replacement
NORTH NATURAL RESOURCES
Kimley Horn and Associates Inc 0 75 150
Feet
246
R r
c
r
Legend
Property Boundary 14 1 acres
Wetland Preservation Area 2 33 acres
O
Upland Preservation Area 1 63 acres
J
f
W
ti
3t
w
c s 19
R
b
Em N WETLAND AND UPLAND
Kimley Horn and Associates Inc 0 75 150 PRESERVATION AREAS
Feet
247
Aofto4 Minnesota Department of Transportation
v y
Metropolitan District Q o m Waters Edge ti 1500 West County Road B 2
Roseville MN 55113 3174
August 11 2011
Robert Generous Senior Planner
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
SUBJECT Wal Mart Mn DOT Review Sll 036
SW Quad of TH 5 Arboretum Blvd and Powers Blvd
City of Chanhassen Carver County
Control Section 1002
Dear Mr Generous
Thank you for the opportunity to review the Wal Mart Traffic Impact Analysis MA
Because of the general nature of this plan Mn DOT is not able to provide comments
concerning issues such as drainage or design As plans are developed we would like the
opportunity to meet with our partners and to review the updated information Mn DOT s
staff has reviewed the document and has the following comment
Ttaffzc
The traffic impact analysis only examines the PM peak period The AM peals period is
more critical for this location since there is a heavy westbound left turning movement
opposing a high eastbound volume heading inbound in the morning Additionally
congestion in the AM peals period may become more significant when Wal Mart begins
operating 24 hours per day
Mn DOT conducted turning movement counts at TH 5 Powers Blvd on 9 25 08 The
turning movement counts completed for this traffic impact analysis have a date of 2 8 11
Mn DOT s counts were significantly higher especially the PM eastbound turning
movement 916 vehicles versus 715 This can likely be attributed to the time of year in
which the counts were taken In the 2030 build options the intersection falls into an
unacceptable LOS E Indeed queues for motorists turning left block both the
northbound and westbound approaches
The TIA recommended monitoring the surrounding growth in the long term in
consideration of a dual left for both eastbound and westbound traffic As stated
previously our concern is for westbound motorists turning left Based on our 9 25 11
turning movement counts this problem should be addressed in the short term Mn DOT
would like to meet with the City of Chanhassen to discuss possible funding options for
the needed improvements
An equal opportunity employer
248
Mn DOT agrees with the TIA recommendation of installing a signal at Powers Blvd and
Park Rd when it is warranted Along with the signal installation at Park Rd the three
signals on Powers at Park Rd TH 5 and W 78 St should be interconnected and have
cross coordination plans implemented with the current TH 5 system For questions
concerning these comments please contact David Sheen 651 234 7824 of Mn DOT
Metro s Traffic Section
Permits
Any use of or work within or affecting Mn DOT right of way requires a permit Permit
forms are available from MnDOT s utility website at htip www dot state mn us utility
Please include one 11 x 17 plan set and one full size plan set with each permit
application Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig
651 234 7911 of MnDOT s Metro Permits Section
Standard Submittal Statement
As a reminder there are four submittal options Please submit either
1 One 1 electronic pdf version of the plans Mn DOT can accept the plans via
e mail at metrodevreviews dot a state mn us provided that each separate e
mail is less than 20 megabytes
2 Three 3 sets of full size plans Although submitting seven sets of full size
plans will expedite the review process Plans can be sent to
Mn DOT Metro District Planning Section
Development Reviews Coordinator
1500 West County Road B 2
Roseville MN 55113
3 One 1 compact disk
4 Plans to Mn DOT s external FTP Site Please send pdf files to
ftp ftp2 dot state mti us pub incoming MetroWatersEdge Plarrning Internet
Explorer doesn t work using ftp so please use an FTP Client or your Windows
Explorer My Computer Also please send a note to
metrodevreviews dot@state mn us indicating that the plans have been
submitted on the FTP site
If you have any questions concerning this review please feel free to contact me at
651 234 7794
Sincere
Tod She he
Planning Supervisor
249
Copy sent via E Mail
Arash Moin Water Resources
Buck Craig Permits
Nancy Jacobson Design
Nicole Peterson Area Engineer
David Sheen Traffic
Ann Braden Metropolitan Council
Paul Oehme City of Chanhassen poehme@ci chanhassen mmus
250
Carver County ft6Cic Works
11360YCWhway 212
Suite 1
Cofogne 9 1N 55322 8016
Pion 952 466 5200 EEax 952 466 5223
Administration
Parks
Engineering
3figfrway ryfaintenance
Equiprne nt Waintenance
Sun tying d Wapping
August 19 2011
Paul Oehme City Engineer
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MIN 55317
RE Walmart TIA
Dear Mr Oehme
After reviewing the Walmart Traffic Impact Analysis we offer the following comments
We agree that a signal should be installed at CSAH 17 and Park Road The County would require a full
build out of turn lanes on Park Road requiring right and left turn lanes both eastbound and westbound
We would not allow a split phasing as shown in the analysis in place of a full build out
We have requested in the past that the modeling include the signal at 78 Street to further understand
any queuing impacts along CSAH 17 This analysis still does not include that intersection and it is
recommended with a build condition that the signals along CSAH 17 are interconnected and include a
cross coordination pattern with TH 5
Due to the large volumes at the intersection at TH 5 and CSAH 17 and the analysis showing that the
queues in the 2013 build condition would negatively impact the safety of CSAH 17 and TH 5 by
reducing deceleration lengths within the turn lanes the County recommends that in the build year the
full recommended geometric improvements at the intersection of TH 5 and CSAH 17 be constructed
This would include dual left turns on all approaches at the intersection of TH 5 and CSAH 17
As you know we are in the process of finalizing our development review process and want to thank you for the
opportunity to review this project early in the process We will require further review as the project moves
along and look forward to working with you
Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions 952 466 5208
Sincerely
Kate Miner PE
Carver County Traffic Engineer
251
E M Kimley Horn
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN and Associates Inc
Memorandum
March 23 2011
Suite 236N
To David Cox AIA 2550 UnNer Avenue West
Walmart Stores Inc st Paul rvrr nesota
55114
From Brian Smalkoski P E AICP PTP PTOE
William Matzek P E CPESC LEED AP
Date March 23 2011
Subject Walmart 5949 00
Chanhassen MN
INTRODUCTION
Walmart Supercenters follow a variety of design variations typically ranging
from approximately 90 000 to 220 000 square feet At around 120 000 square
feet the proposed Chanhassen Supercenter represents a relatively compact
footprint for a discount store that includes a full service grocery department
Classified as free standing discount superstores Land Use 813 by the Institute
of Transportation Engineers ITE Walmart Supercenters typically utilize
independent trip and parking generation rates from the more general free
standing discount store classification Land Use 815 which do not include full
service grocery departments Parking Generation 4 Edition published in 2010
by ITE includes only a single parking generation study of a discount superstore
Carried out on a Wednesday in mid April the observed peak parking demand
ratio for the 220 000 square foot site was found to be 1 85 vehicles per 1 000
square feet gross floor area GFA Due to the lack of available data for Saturday
parking generation rates at compact discount superstores it was necessary to
conduct counts at local sites in order to establish reasonable parking generation
rates for a typical Saturday in December at the proposed Chanhassen MN
Walmart Supercenter
PARKING STUDY
A total of three sites located in the Minneapolis Saint Paul metropolitan area
were selected for analysis Each site located in Apple Valley Bloomington and
Eden Prairie respectively was originally constructed as a standard Walmart
store and underwent expansion during 2009 2010 to allow for the inclusion of a
full service grocery department With an average size of 142 000 square feet the
three sites studied were 118 000 121 000 and 188 000 square foot Supercenters
post expansion Parking supply at each site was calculated at 5 0 5 0 and 4 4
spaces per 1 000 square feet GFA respectively for a weighted average of 4 7
spaces per 1 000 square feet GFA Ten hourly independent field counts were
TEL 651 645 4197
FAX 651 645 5116
SCANNED
252
C F Kimley Horn
and Associates Inc
Average Peak Period Parking Demand vs 1 000 sq ft GFA
On a Saturday Non December
conducted on Saturday February 19 2011 at each of the three sites between
9 00 a m and 7 00 p m Although demand never exceeded the effective supply
of parking snow storage reduced the observed February parking supply at each
site by 30 32 and 10 respectively The peak hour of demand was unique
at each site with the average peak hour falling between 2 and 3 p m The final
results of the parking study documented Saturday maximum demand ratios of
2 54 2 83 and 2 37 vehicles per 1 000 square feet GFA This represents an
average ratio of 2 58 vehicles per 1 000 square feet GFA with a standard
deviation of 0 23 Final results of the parking study formatted to represent
standard ITE documentation are provided in Figure 1
Land Use 813
Free Standing Discount Superstore
Statistic Peak Period Demand
Peak Period 100 200 m 2 00 3 00 m 400 500 p rrL
Number ofStudy Sites 3
Average Size ofStudy Sites 142000 sq ft GFA
Average Peak Period Parking Demand 2 58 vehicles per 1 000 sq ft GFA
Standard Deviation 0 23
Coefficient of Variation 9
Range 2 37 2 83 vehicles per 1 000 sq ft GFA
85th Percentile 1 2 74 vehicles per 1 000 sq ft GFA
33rd Percentile 1 2 48 vehicles per 1 000 sq fL GFA
Saturday Non December Peak Period Parking
Demand
600
500
400
L
7
w 300
Y A
e 200
6
100
e
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
x 1 000 sq ft GFA
Actual Data Points
0
March 23 2011
0
Figure 1 Parking Study Results
253
W7 Kimley Horn F1 and Associates Inc
March 23 2011
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
The parking study conducted in February represents a snapshot of potential
parking demand for a new site and it is necessary to take into account additional
correction factors depending on the planning objectives for the site
Seasonal Variation Consumer spending fluctuates throughout the
year and much like a shopping center free standing discount superstores
exhibit changing trip generation rates month to month Figure 2 which
represents changing trip generation rates by month for shopping centers
in the United States demonstrates that parking lot design is heavily
dependent upon the design month of interest This is typically either an
average month the non December peak month or December the
month with peak demand
150
130
Monthly Variation in Shopping Center Parking Demand
140
0 120
F
110
r
100 0
w 90 c
80
s
70
50
60
F Month
P S eQ S ao p
Figure 2 Monthly Variation in Shopping Center Traffie
Effective Parldng Supply The Urban Land Institute defines effective
parking supply as the number of occupied spaces at optimum operating
efficiency Parking lots are typically perceived as full at less than the
actual total capacity generally around 85 95 percent occupancy To
prevent driver frustration and reduce time spent searching for open
spaces it may be necessary to take this factor into account during
parking lot design
Snow Storage Depending on site location snowfall may have a
significant effect on usable parking supply for three to five months out of
the year It is often necessary to take this into account in the design
stage or develop contingency plans such as contracted snow removal
services
254
C IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN F Kimley Horn
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN and Associates Inc
March 23 2011
Shared Parking Some sites have the potential to utilize shared
parking particular if the peak hours of demand for each of the land uses
have no overlap Schools and churches for example are often
compatible for shared parking reductions and certain retail and
restaurant uses may exhibit offset peak hours
All of these factors potentially play a role in the ultimate parking demand for the
site and adjustments to average observed parking demand ratios must follow
from specific design objectives for the site and context sensitivity to the
surrounding communities
The Chanhassen Supercenter will be located in a suburban industrial setting with
no nearby street parking As such it may be necessary to plan for peak seasonal
demand to prevent yearly parking spillover problems during the holiday shopping
season By planning for absolute peak demand however there will be an
oversupply of parking for the remaining 11 months out of the year making the
application of additional factors such as snow storage or effective parking supply
impractical In such a case it is reasonable to take the calculated average
observed parking demand ratio and correct for seasonal variation to obtain a
design ratio for a December peak month
Parking Supply Ratio Observed Demand Seasonal Factor
Seasonal Factor 0 85 1 49 0 57
February to December Peak
2 58 0 57
4 5
In the calculation a seasonal variation factor of 0 57 is used to account for the
time of year in which the parking study was conducted February relative to
parking demand during the peak month of December Parking generation rates at
shopping centers in February represent about 85 of the demand during a typical
month and 57 of the demand during December December demand is typically
around 149 of the demand for a typical month These seasonal adjustment
factors when taken together allow for a final recommendation of a supply ratio
of 4 5 spaces per 1 000 square feet GFA which will provide adequate parking for
the peak month during the year December
KA TWC LDEV WALMART 70419 0 DOCS PARKING STUDY Walmart Parking Study
Memo Chanhassen Final docx
Parking Generation Fourth Edition Washington DC Institute of Transportation
Engineers 2010
Smith Mary S Shared Parking Second Edition Washington D C ULI the Urban
Land Institute and the International Council of Shopping Centers 2005 Page 14
Smith Mary S Shared Parking Second Edition Washington D C ULI the Urban
Land Institute and the International Council of Shopping Centers 2005 Page 3
255
4
777 7A4
o
1000 PARK ROAD PARK ROAD
STORE 5949 00
CARVER MINNESOTA
IMPROVEMENT EXHIBIT
256
N 9 namw K TWC IDEV W U T 70119 0 CARD E lI OF 5llq Uannaa Ney 5 4 CR i ImO ewmenta Etq 0 2 WF X 11 2 Nov 18 2011 3 15 Ey lb d N
memnt a w w ww a aamwb ma awwe wa a nw M m a narunn a rwn b w wr a a a s M aw rn a wan n w wsvro gang a ae aro w rane a pub w e n n wln n wm ewawb w Womb M anrwn mn mm aue wo M anon rM e Iwrwn w e aewaw
lus
11111
o
v
m
61
o
i
9 e
CHANHASSEN
0 m m 1000 PARK ROAD HWY 5 CR 17 B CD n qaq uK a as
STORE 5949 00 IMPROVEMENT EXHIBIT oo
Mq mt
WLLIAMwD MAiR EK e 0 ww
9 CARVER MINNESOTA T x9N r 15780
gEV19dN5 OAiE FlY 257
Traffic Impact Analysis
Walmart Store 5949 00
Chanhassen Minnesota
Prepared for
Walmart Stores Inc
Bentonville Arkansas
Prepared by
Kimley Horn and Associates Inc
St Paul Minnesota
Kimley Hom and Associates Inc
May 2011
116199062
CITY O zrrIANNASSEN
MNf 2 6 2011
ENGINES NG DEPT
C Kimley Horn
and Associates Inc
258
Traffic Impact Analysis
Walmart Store 5949 00
Chanhassen Minnesota
Prepared for
Walmart Stores Inc
Bentonville Arkansas
Prepared by
Kimley Horn and Associates Inc
St Paul Minnesota
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by
me or under my r r ofess
ect supervision and that I am
a duly Licensed ional Engineer under the
laws of the State Minnesota
By
Brian R Smalk ci P E
License No 47531
Date S 7 L
259
Kimley Horn Walmart store 5949 00
Traffic Impact Analysis and Associates Inc Chanhassen Minnesota
I Introduction
May 2011 1
Walmart Stores Inc is proposing the construction of a new store number 5949 00 near
the southwest quadrant of the Arboretum Boulevard Trunk Highway 5 and Powers
Boulevard CSAH 17 intersection in Chanhassen Minnesota see Figure 1 The project
is anticipated to be completed by the year 2013 and will include retail and grocery land
uses on a vacant industrial parcel The proposed development site plan is shown in
Figure 2 The purpose of this report is to document the anticipated traffic impacts that the
change in land use at the proposed Walmart site will have on the surrounding roadway
network intersections
This traffic impact analysis TIA represents a review of traffic impacts of the project
based on land use and site plan information and is intended to identify the key traffic
issues associated with the project This TIA documents the existing traffic conditions in
the vicinity of the site estimates the traffic anticipated to be generated by the project
distributes and assigns these trips to the adjacent roadway system and evaluates the
traffic operations of key intersections near the site and those providing access to and from
the site In order to have a basis of comparison a no build analysis was completed for
each future scenario that includes the general background growth on the adjacent
roadways as well as traffic generated by other possible development adjacent to the
project
Based on the analysis the TIA evaluates roadway and or traffic control mitigation
measures to accommodate future traffic levels in the system and whether these mitigation
measures are triggered by background growth or the proposed project
May 2011 1
260
jjv
x j
7
A
Up
JN
L
ca
Walmart
Store
Vi
At
WAV Ivy N
J
00
n
N FIGURE 1 Site Location
0 100 200 400
Feet
I I
1 7 Kimley Horn
I and Associates Inc
261
I
o
t
I Walmart
t Store
O
0
o 0 0 0 0
r
N FIGURE 2 Site Plan
o so 100 200 PP M n Kimley Horn
Feet and Associates Inc
262
Kimle Horn Walmart Store 5949 00 Y Traffic Impact Analysis and Associates In c Chanhassen Minnesota
Study Area
The project site is bounded by Arboretum Boulevard TH 5 on the north Powers
Boulevard on the east and Park Road on the south The proposed development will
include an up to 120 209 square foot Walmart store Current nearby land uses are a mix
of office and industrial Access to the site will be provided via the two existing
driveways on Park Road with a southbound turn lane constructed on the west driveway
The segment of Park Road between Powers Boulevard and the west driveway will be
reconfigured to accommodate westbound right turn lanes at the driveways as well as an
eastbound left turn lane at the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard and a
westbound left turn lane at the west driveway A center median will divide the two
directions of travel
Data Collection
PM peak hour turning movement counts were collected on Tuesday February 8 2011
and Wednesday February 9 2011 for the following study intersections
Arboretum Boulevard TH 5 Powers Boulevard
Park Road Powers Boulevard 12 hour count
Park Road East Driveway
Park Road West Driveway
Figure 3 displays the existing lane geometry and traffic control for the intersections in
the study area Figure 4 summarizes the existing turning movement volumes for the PM
peak hour conditions volumes were balanced among the four intersections See
Appendix A for the raw turning movement count data
E
May 2011 4
7
263
Arboretum Park
boulevard
v
f v 1 Roa
4
b
m
t N
T a f lt ta
SITE r rf
4
4
Park J Park
Road Road
r
t i
N FIGURE 3 Existing Lane Geometry
0 120 240 380 OPP KimleyHorn
Feet and Associates Inc
264
269 Vii 68
o 1242 t 1 l o 6
141 er 36
Pa Arboretum Road Boulevard M t n 7 r 220
715 i T 4
7S
14 etAll
AkA
OF
J
SITEt
3 31 V
t h far y y t r
J
I
g
0
107
32
Park p i 3 d@ Q Park
p Road a r Road
116w
s7
7
A7
N FIGURE 4 2011 Existing Turning Movement Counts
0 loo 200 400 Oi mj Kimley Hom
f 1 and Associates Inc Feet xx PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
f
265
Kimley Horn Walmart Store 5949 00
Traffic Impact Analysis and Associates Inc Chanhassen Minnesota
I Trip Generation
The Institute of Transportation Engineers ITE Trip Generation 8 Edition was used to
calculate the anticipated net new external project trips for the proposed development A
120 209 square foot free standing discount superstore land use code 813 was used to
determine the total number of trips generated by the site Total pass by trip reduction
was determined to be 28 Of the total calculated pass by trips 70 percent 20 percent
and 10 percent were assumed to originate on Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard
and Park Road respectively
Existing non vehicular travel was examined in the TMCs and determined to be
negligible therefore no reductions were made for transit use or pedestrian travel The
trip generation for the proposed project with adjustments for pass by trips is shown in
Table 1 The proposed site is anticipated to generate 554 trips 271 entering 283
exiting for the PM peak hour
i
May 2011 7
266
0
t J
Table 1
Trip Generation
PM Peak Hour
Land
Use Land Use T Size Units Formula
Total
Trips Enter Exit
Pass by Net New
External
Tri Pass by
Total
Pass by
Trips
Pass by
Trips
Eder
Pass by
Trips
Exit Total Faster Exit
813 1 Free Standing Discount Superstore 1 120 209 1 KSF T 4 61 X 554 271 1 283 1 28 0 155 76 1 79 1 399 195 204 v
1
n CD
v
n
w
D c
A D d D
n
v N v
267
Kimley Horn Walmart Store 5949 00
t Traffic Impact Analysis and Associates Inc Chanhassen Minnesota
Future Traffic Projections
Project buildout is expected to be in 2013 Linear growth of 1 8 percent per year was
applied to the counts to obtain background traffic for the year 2013 This growth is based
on historical annual average daily traffic AADT on Powers Boulevard and Arboretum
Boulevard since 2001 The 2013 no build peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure
5
To obtain background traffic estimates for 2030 however it was determined that 1 8
percent linear growth per year was an unreasonable estimate over a 17 year period
Instead average annual growth on Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard was
obtained from the Carver County Travel Demand Model over the 30 year period from
2000 to 2030 due to its basis in census data local comprehensive plans and established
estimates A linear growth of 0 5 percent per year was determined and then applied to the
balanced 2013 estimates to establish a baseline estimate for 2030
Growth from demand model largely represents long term regional trends however and
does not provide reliable estimates for traffic growth at individual intersections due to the
development of specific parcels Based on discussions with the City of Chanhassen it
was determined that traffic from five nearby parcels using square footage and
development type estimates would be added to the 2030 baseline estimate to establish a
final estimate for 2030 background traffic One development located near the Powers
Boulevard TH 212 interchange represents a revision to the original estimates used
within the Carver County Travel Demand Model The assumed PM peak period trips
based on single family residential were subtracted from the total trips calculated based on
the revised land use scenario commercial and office to represent a land use change
from the regional demand model rather than an entirely new development Peak trip
generation estimates for each parcel is provided in Table 2 with the location of each site
shown in Figure 6
The net trips anticipated to be generated in the PM peak hour by the surrounding
development were calculated and distributed onto the roadway network discussed
below and added to the 0 5 per year background growth from 2013 to 2030 The
resultant total background growth in the study area therefore varies by intersection
ranging from 1 6 percent per year linearly on Arboretum Boulevard up to 4 1 percent per
year linearly on Powers Boulevard Total off site trips are shown in Figure 7 The 2030
no build peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 8
May 2011
268
0
8
Table 2
Off Site Trip Generation
PM Peak Hour
Pass by Net New
Total Pass try Pass by External
Total Pass by Pass by Trips Trips Trips
Total Enter Exit Land Use T Size Units Formula Trips Enter Exit Trips Enter Exit F63 Specialty Retail Center 22 350 KSF T 2 40 X 21 48 75 33 42 0 0 0 0 75 33 42
Specialty Retail Center 32 800 KSF T 2 40 X 21 48 100 44 56 0 0 0 0 100 44 56
General Light Industrial 221 000 KSF T 0 97 X 214 26 188 0 0 0 0 214 26 188
Clinic 28 980 KSF T 5 18 X 150 62 88 0 0 0 0 150 62 88
GeneralOf2ice 948 000 KSF T 1 12 X 78 81 1 141 194 947 0 0 0 0 1 141 194 947
Shopping Center 406 000 KSF Ln T 0 67Ln X 3 37 1 627 797 830 0 0 0 0 1 627 797 830
210 Single arnil Detached Housing 132 000 Acres T 2 74 X 36 1 123 0 0 0 0 362 239 123
Using directional distribution from trips ends vs employees PM peak rate 2 945 917 2 028 0 0 0 0 2 945 917 2 028
p x
c
P
C7 m
m v
ID
W m
cn
D
A
D tU D
0 y O d N v
269
y
1
1237 w 6
146
Arboretum r
m
Park
Boulevard
228 rr I
t i t s 63 I
p 5 741 m ry r 4
a o r S L
m y c ti i
T
1
Si wars I s s t yc y i r
liver K
w
Ar
ti 4 ra a
R f
1
S 1 mil ti w r t 1
r 1 SITE
W t C dirt t i f Ei syi r Cl i f yy
L
Bl
j
Park
I Poad t i f A 4 Road
N y Y 4
F F F 1200
a C S cep 5 r
q F
I FIGURE 5 2013 No Build Turning Movement Counts
o 100 200 400 PP Kimley Horn
Feet xx PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Associates Inc
270
d 6 Y
nom
LU 814
22 350 sq ft LU 630
28 0 Sca ft
s r 32 800 sq ft x
LU 110
f 221 000 sq t
1
ri
it
Ap
WE
t d ICS i i g g
j r1 sA T ee P J 4 F t t L 7
r 0 iR r
w f r w 5 i D Mks
mAl
i
FA
LU 710 Y
948 000 sq ft REMOVED
LU 210 r
132 Acres r
LU 220
406 000 sq ft
271
0 66 4111 0
j 118 1 f Arboretum Park
Boulevard
8 1 49 r t Road
15
A
ry
Yr
m c
F x
p
17 22
V I
j
4 x 10
fN
SITE
1
y I fin j
t
1
t a9Y s 7 e cam J 7 i
f Y
f G iv P1k 1
Y
S
Y r f i
q
i r
yl I 6 r 4 t 0
4
O O O 4M 59
q t
Park irr S
Road
0
Road 1
71 R1 y I 71 y o 0 1
j F
N FIGURE 7 2030 Off Site Development Trips
0 112 5 225 aso KimleyHom
Feel xx PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Associates Inc
272
y 303 142
In
1396 v 7
27 62
Arboretum V
y
Park
Boulevard Q Ca 117
4
4 Road
255 7 Y 313 r 3v
a a r
t t
2
J
x t SITE
tit
o s
180 t
Park
36
P rk
Road
r fi 201
N FIGURE 8 2030 No Build Turning Movement Counts
0 100 400 PP KimleyHorn
f 1 r Feet xx PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes b and Associates Inc
L
273
I
Kimley Horn Walmart Store 5949 00
Traffic Impact Analysis and Associates Inc Chanhassen Minnesota
Project Trip Distribution
The project trip distribution is based on selected zone analysis from the Carver County
Travel Demand Model which represents a refined version of the Metropolitan Council s
demand model for the Twin Cities region I
t
As shown in Figure 9 the proposed site is located in TAZ 142 3 which includes a region
bounded by Hazeltine Boulevard on the west Arboretum Boulevard on the north and
Powers Boulevard on the east After assigning trips to the network vehicles originating
from or heading to the TAZ on each of the 10 roadways or centroid connectors shown
in the figure were measured to calculate a daily distribution for both the 2000 and 2030
analysis years Results were then interpolated between the two base years to estimate
distribution for the 2013 analysis year By adding trips to and from the north lines 1 2
9 and 10 to and from the east line 3 to and from the south lines 4 5 and 6 and to
and from the west lines 7 and 8 the final directional distribution was established for the
site
Figure 10 shows the final assumed trip distribution for the project with 35 percent to the
east 20 percent to the north 20 percent to the west and 25 percent to the south 10
percent of the trips to the west and 10 percent of the trips to the south were assumed to
use Park Road west of the site
Trip distribution for the four surrounding off site parcels contained within TAZ 142 3
was assumed the same as for the Walmart site with slight assignment modifications
based on location For the modified parcel located near TH 212 trip distribution was
analyzed for TAZ 146 which contains the proposed development showing that
approximately 11 of the trips to and from the development utilized Powers Boulevard
Estimated project trips shown in Figure 11 were then added to 2013 and 2030 no build
traffic conditions along with corrections for pass by trips as shown in Figure 12 The
final traffic estimates for the build condition are shown in Figures 13 and 14 for 2013
and 2030 respectively
Vl 2 15
274
z
r
r r f
41
t 10
II
142 3
142 1 142 E
r
I
I
Ile
r
1
N
0 500 1 000 2 000
Feet
mI
FIGURE 9 Selected Zone Analysis
raz Boundary Kimley Horn
Centroid Connector and Associates Inc
275
I
t Walmart
Store
t Y
J
J
Park
Road
1 i
T C
FIGURE 10 Site Trip Distribution
o 100 200 400 PP M Kimley Horn ti Feet xx Trip Distribution Percentage and Associates Inc
Arboretum
Boulevard
o v
J
rr
1 Yi
I
t Walmart
Store
t Y
J
J
Park
Road
1 i
T C
FIGURE 10 Site Trip Distribution
o 100 200 400 PP M Kimley Horn ti Feet xx Trip Distribution Percentage and Associates Inc
276
t
FIGURE 11 Project Trips
xx PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
Road i
194 M
o F
i
Klmley Horn
tii and Associates Inc
277
0 L 0
0 0 0 30 0
Arboretum j r 30 0 11 I Boulevard
O J i
G
9 11
rto r
23
l
WStore a h store
j t P g t il ro y
W4
WO
f 24 48
0
Park t S e f d 0
Park
Road v K Road
o 4 71 mc 0 0 0
a t
0
v it
r FIGURE 12 Pass Trips
0 100 200 400 C n Kimley Horn
Feet xx PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Associates InC I
278
279 i 70
ry v r 1257 ry 6
pp 37 21 Park Arboretum r Road Boulevard
228 a a t 275
718 m v r 4 1111111110 m
89 131
o
i
d w
o
r s J xV it Jed Vc 3
Walmart
rGrt i I
Store
f
i R M1 I t t a r
7 sk
171
227 i 1
Park
q p I 0
Park
Road p T Road
tl
93 y 385
N FIGURE 13 2013 Build Turning Movement Counts
0 100 200 400 PP Kimley Horn
t Feet xx PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Associates Inc
279
303
fir
142
1 366 7
374 J r 62
arboretum Park
Boulevard
379 t Road
V 3 t r
r 160
3 s Nt
as o
o
r
I
Walmart
Store l
Al
86 K mow
171
0 o n 144 r i
73 yy 0
299
p Park Park
Road
14 o t t t Road qr
172 466b
4
i r rz
r
FIGURE 14 2030 Build Turning Movement Counts f 0 100 200 400 P Kimley Horn t Feet xx PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Associates Inc
280
Kimle Horn Walmart Store 5949 00 y Traffic Impact Analysis
and Associates Inc Chanhassen Minnesota
Level of Service Analyses
Intersection level of service LOS analyses were performed for each of the intersections
within the study area using the signalized analysis methodology found in the Highway
Capacity Manual HCM and Trafficware s Synchro SimTraffic version 7 Each
intersection was analyzed for PM peak hours for the following scenarios
2011 existing traffic conditions
2013 no build without project trips conditions
2013 build with project trips added conditions
2030 no build without project trips conditions and
2030 build with project trips added conditions
One of the primary measures of effectiveness used to evaluate intersection traffic
operations as defined in the HCM is level of service LOS a qualitative letter grade
A through F based on seconds of vehicle delay due to the traffic control device at an
intersection By definition LOS A conditions represent high quality operations i e
motorists experience very little delay or interference and LOS F conditions represent
very poor operations i e extreme delay or severe congestion This study used the LOS
D E boundary as an indicator of satisfactory traffic operations Figure 15 displays the
LOS thresholds for signalized and unsignalized intersections
Figure IS Highway Capacity Manual Level of Service Criteria
100
90
80
d 70
t m
v 60
R O u
50
T
d
40
d
A
30
Q
20
10
0
May 2011 22
Si gnalized Unsig nalized
281
Klmley Horn Walmart Store 5949 00
Traffic Impact Analysis t and Associates Inc Chanhassen Minnesota
It was assumed that for the future scenarios an intersection with unsatisfactory operations
should be addressed through signal timing modifications or if that was not possible
through implementation of an intersection or roadway improvement
In order to determine the impacts of the project on the transportation network a traffic
operations analysis was performed on the internal and surrounding roadway network The
analysis process included determining level of service and queue lengths at each of the
study intersections for existing no build and build conditions Supporting SimTraffic
reports are included in Appendix C For each scenario five one hour simulations were
conducted in SimTraffic
In each of the following sections a description of potentially unsatisfactory operational
characteristics is summarized for each scenario modeled For each scenario a table is
included where the intersection level of service and delay is summarized The SimTraffic
reports were reviewed to identify individual movements that experience unsatisfactory
level of service and delay or queue lengths that are anticipated to extend beyond available
storage lengths Only in instances where an individual movement experiences an
unsatisfactory the information be measure of effectiveness will movement summarized
1
it
t
it
1
2011 Existing Operations
Table 3 provides 2011 level of service LOS results for the existing conditions All
intersections within the study area operate at LOS D or better during the PM peak period
with the three unsignalized intersections operating at LOS A A total of six movements
operate at LOS E with average delays per vehicle summarized as follows
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard eastbound left 63 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard westbound left 75 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard northbound left 74 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard northbound through 68 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard southbound left 73 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard southbound through 66 seconds
At the Arboretum Boulevard intersection the signal is timed such that the through
movements on Arboretum Boulevard are maintained at LOS C with lower LOS on
Powers Boulevard the lower volume side street All left turn queues are contained
within the available storage lengths and no blocking by queues in adjacent lanes is
expected The delays associated with the LOS E or F movements are not associated wit
operational problems at the signal but are due to relatively low demand and long cycle
lengths
May 2011 23
282
J Y A Kimley Horn
3 and Associates Inc
Walmart Store 5949 00
Traffic Impact Analysis
Chanhassen Minnesota
Table 3 2011 Existing Conditions
2011 PM Peak Hour
Lek Turn Operations by Movement Approach Overall Intersection
Left Through Right Queues Intersection Control Approach 95th Delay Delay Delay Delay Delay
Percentile sec h LOS sec veh
LOS sec veh LOS sec veh
LOS
sec veh
LOS
EB 310 63 0 21 9 C 4 4 A 30 2 C
Arboretum Wa 225 75 0 34 8 C 3 9 A 33 0 C
36 0 D Blvd Signal NB 130 73 8 68 1 3 2 A 50 4 D
Powers Blvd
58 100 1 73 1 66 3 249 A 41 6 D
EB 0 1 9 8 A 11 5 B 541 A 7 2 A
Park Rd WB 0 1 10 4 B 13 1 B 5 1 A 7 3 A 37 A Powers Blvd TWSC NB 40 7 5 A 009 A 5 1 A 1 9 A
4 6 A 3 1 A 3 6 A 3 3 A
0 6 A 0 1 A 0 6 A
Park Rd 1 6 A 0 4 A 0 7 A 0 9 A East TWSC 5 7 A 30 A 3 3 A
Driveway F 0 2 A 0 3 A 0 2 A
Park Rd 2 0 A 0 5 A 0 9 A 1 0 A West TWSC 5 5 A 7 9 A 2 6 A 3 4 A
Driveway 7 1 A 71 A
2013 No Build Operations
Table 4 provides 2013 level of service LOS results for the 2013 no build scenario
using background linear growth from 2011 to 2013 of 1 8 percent per year The
simulation assumes the same signal timing plan at the intersection of Arboretum
Boulevard and Powers Boulevard as under existing conditions All intersections within
the study area are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during PM peak period with
the three unsignalized intersections operating at LOS A A total of six movements are
expected to operate at LOS E with average delays per vehicle summarized as follows
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard eastbound left 65 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard westbound left 76 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard northbound left 74 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard northbound through 68 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard southbound left 74 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard southbound through 70 seconds
At the Arboretum Boulevard intersection the through movements on Arboretum
Boulevard are maintained at LOS D or C with lower LOS on Powers Boulevard the
lower volume side street All left turn queues are accommodated within the available
storage lengths and no blocking by queues in adjacent lanes is expected The delays
associated with the LOS E movements are not representative of operational problems
the signal but are due to relatively low demand and long cycle lengths
May 2011 24
t
283
r
Kimley Horn Walmart Store 5949 00
Traffic Impact Analysis and Associates Inc Chanhassen Minnesota
Table 4 2013 No Build
2013 No Build PM Peak Hour
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard eastbound left 66 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard northbound through 74 seconds
Lek Turn Operations by Movement
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard southbound left 75 seconds
Intersection Control Approach Queues
Approach Overall Intersection Lek
Park Road Powers Boulevard eastbound left 55 seconds
Throu h Ri ht
95th Delay
2013 no build levels with increased delay to the westbound left and northbound left
Delay
movements The northbound left turn queue is anticipated to extend beyond the 230 foot
Delay Delay Delay
2011 25
Percentile sec veh LOS sec veh LOS s LOS LOS sec veh LOS sec veh LOS
EB 305 6405 22 4 C 4 6 A 31 5 C
Arboretum WB 265 75 8 37 8 D 4 1 A 35 5 D Blvd Signal 37 5 D
Powers Blvd NB 145 74 2 68 1 3 3 q 488 D
SB 120 73 6 69 8 3 0 A 42 9 D
EB 0 11 0 B 10 0 A 502 A 7 9 A
Park Rd WB 0 9 7 A 11 5 B 5 3 A 7 1 A Powers Blvd TWSC NB 35 73 A 1 0 A 5 5 A 2 0 A
3 7 A
SB 30 S 4 A 32 A 3 6 A 3 4 A
EB 0 0 6 A 0 1 A 0 6 A Park Rd
WB 0 1 7 A 0 5 A 0 8 A East TWSC
NB 0 6 7 A 3 0 A 3 5 A
1 0 A
Driveway 58 0
EB 0 0 3 A 0 3 A Park Rd
WB 0 2 2 A 0 4 A 0 9 A West TWSC
NB 0 5 2 A 6 7 A 2 7 A 3 2 A
0 9 A
Drivew ay
SB 0 1 4 9 A 4 9 A
2013 Build Operations
Table 5 provides 2013 LOS results for the 2013 build scenario based on background
traffic plus trips associated with the Walmart parcel The simulation assumes the same
signal timing plan at the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard as
under existing conditions All intersections within the study area are anticipated to
operate at LOS D or better during the PM peak period with the three unsignalized
intersections operating at LOS C or better A total of eight movements are expected to
operate at LOS E or F with average delays for the LOS E movements summarized as
follows
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard eastbound left 66 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard northbound through 74 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard southbound left 75 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard southbound left 75 seconds
The following movements are expected to operate at LOS F under the 2013 build
scenario
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard westbound left 174 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard northbound left 260 seconds
Park Road Powers Boulevard eastbound left 55 seconds
Park Road East Driveway northbound right 494 seconds
Operations at the Arboretum Boulevard intersection are expected to remain around the
2013 no build levels with increased delay to the westbound left and northbound left
movements The northbound left turn queue is anticipated to extend beyond the 230 foot
t May 2011 25
284
Kimle Horn Wa art Store
Traffic t Analysis y Trfic Impact Malysis and Associates Inc Chanhassen Minnesota
left turn lane with a 95 percentile queue of 396 feet The adjacent through lane will
also block access to the left turn lane with a 95 percentile queue of 563 feet The
westbound left turn queue is expected to fit within the turn lane however with a 95
percentile queue of 598 feet and 630 feet of storage length and a posted speed of 55 mph
left turning vehicles will need to begin decelerating in the adjacent through lane delaying
vehicles making the westbound through movement
At the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard the eastbound left turn
movement is expected to operate at LOS F due to increased volumes during the PM peak
hour Queuing from this movement is expected to block vehicles exiting the east
driveway from the south leading to LOS F on the northbound approach As a low
volume side street approach it is likely that most vehicles will reroute and utilize the
west driveway during the PM peak hour No turn lane spillback or lane blocking is
anticipated from any of the left turn lanes at the intersection
Table 5 2013 Build
2013 Build PM Peak Hour
Lek Turn Operations by Movement Approach Overall Intersection
Lek Through Right Queues Intersection Control Approach 95th Delay Delay Delay Delay Delay
Percentile sec veh LOS sec veh LOS sec veh LOS sec veh LOS sec veh LOS
EB 320 65 6 25 5 C 5 0 A 3109 C
Arboretum W 600 174 4 37 1 D 4 0 A 49 3 D
Blvd Signal NB 395 260 1 73 6 3 8 A 85 5
51 4 D
Powers Blvd
SB 105 74 7 74 9 3 2 A 48 4 D
EB 220 55 3 16 5 C 4 2 A 39 0
WB 0 20 4 C 22 7 C Park Rd 11 0 B 14 4 B 13 4 B Powers Blvd TWSC NB 65 11 0 B 1 5 A 5 3 A 3 8 A
58 40 7 0 A 3 6 A 5 3 A 4 6 A
EB 0 23 5 C 1 3 A 23 4 C
Park Rd W 0 0 6 A A 0 7 A
East TWSC NB 0 493 93 5 493 5
24 6 C
Driveway q7 A 47 A SB 0
EB 0 3 2 A 2 7 A 1 9 A 2 7 A
Park Rd W 25 2 1 A 0 2 A 0 5 A 8 6 A Wes TWSC
NB 0 6 1 A 8 9 A 6 4 A 6 4 A J Driveway SB 200 18 9 C 3 4 A 1 18 4 C
2013 Build Operations with Signal Installation and Optimization
Table 6 provides LOS results for the 2013 build scenario assuming the installation of a
signal at the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard as well as optimization of
splits at the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard The simulation
assumes an optimized timing plan Park Road and Powers Boulevard with the signal
operating with an 80 second cycle length half that of the 160 second cycle at Arboretum
Boulevard and Powers Boulevard to allow for coordination with the optimized splits at
the major intersection Although signal optimization removes approximately 6 seconds
from the major street approaches the signal remains coordinated along the TH 5 corridor
with minimal increases in delay
May 2011 26
1
I
I
t
285
t
PP P Kimley Horn Walmart Store 5949 00
Traffic Impact Analysis r and Associates Inc Chanhassen Minnesota
All intersections within the study area are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better
during PM peak period with the two unsignalized intersections on Park Road operating
at LOS A Similar to the no build scenario a total of six movements are expected to
operate at LOS E or F with average delays for the LOS E intersections summarized as
follows
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard eastbound left 71 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard westbound left 71 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard northbound left 69 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard northbound through 62 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard southbound left 71 seconds
The following movement is expected to operate at LOS F under the 2013 build scenario
with signal installation
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard southbound through 87 seconds
Operations at the Arboretum Boulevard intersection are expected to remain around the
2013 no build levels with increased delay to the southbound through movement With
the signal timing modified queuing and blocking issues are eliminated The 95
percentile queue for both the northbound left turn and through movements is reduced to
232 feet which is easily accommodated within the taper of the 230 foot storage length
The 95 percentile westbound left turn queue is reduced to 340 feet which leaves nearly
300 feet in the turn lane for vehicles to decelerate
At the signalized intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard all movements are
anticipated to operate at LOS D or better With the signal in place queues are anticipated
to clear during most cycles allowing the northbound right turn movement at the east
driveway to operate at LOS A
The delays associated with the LOS E or F movements are not associated with
operational problems at the signal but are due to relatively low demand and long cycl
lengths No geometric improvements are recommended and the cycle length at
Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard is expected to remain at 160 seconds to
maximize the coordinated westbound and eastbound through movements
May 2011 27
286
Kimle Horn Walmart Store 5949 00 y Traffic Impact Analysis
d and Associates Inc Chanhassen Minnesota
Table 6 2013 Build with Imorovements
2013 Build with Signal PM Peak Hour
Lek Turn
Queues
Operations by Movement Approach Overall Intersection
Lek Through Right Intersection Control Approach 95th Delay Delay Delay Delay Delay
Percentile sec veh LOS sec veh LOS sec veh
LOS sec veh LOS sec veh LOS
EB 315 70 8 30 6 C 5 1 A 36 4 D
Arboretum WEI 340 71 3 41 4 D 4 1 A 39 2 D
Blvd Signal NB 230 68 7 62 1 4 4 A 43 2 D
41 2 0
Powers Blvd
58 105 71 0 87 1 3 3 A 52 8 D
EB 195 27 3 C 27 3 C 3 7 A 2000 B
Park Rd WB 0 40 2 D 3704 D 12 2 8 21 2 C 13 2 B
NB 115 27 0 C 9 6 A 6 0 A 13 4 8 Powers Blvd Signal
SB 50 133 B 6 8 A 6 0 A 6 8 A
EB 0 2 3 A 0 5 A 2 3 A
Park Rd W 0 0 6 A 0 6 A 006 A 1 7 A East TWSC
NB 0 8 6 A 8 6 A
Driveway 58 0 2 3 A 2 3 A
EB 0 2 9 A 0 6 A 0 2 A 0 9 A
Park Rd
WB 25 2 1 A 0 2 A 0 6 A 0 9 A 4 1 A West TWSC
NB 0 5 9 A 7 4 A 3 9 A 4 7 A
Driveway SB 1 95 8 5 A 2 5 A 8 3 A
Improsement A Optimization or Signal Splits CO Amorelum and rowers
Improvement B Signal Installation @ Park and P rs
2030 No Build Operations
Split optimization was assumed under the 2030 no build scenario due to the significant
increase in volume from surrounding off site development although the cycle length was
assumed to remain at 160 seconds Without split optimization the intersection of
Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard is anticipated to operate at LOS F with
queues propagating throughout the network
Table 7 provides 2030 LOS results for the no build scenario using background linear
growth from 2013 to 2030 of 0 5 percent per year plus additional traffic associated with
five parcels within the study area All intersections within the study area are anticipated
to operate at LOS D or better during the PM peak period with the three unsignalized
intersections operating at LOS C or better A total of 13 movements are expected to
operate at LOS E or F with average delays per vehicle for the LOS E movements
summarized as follows
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard westbound left 66 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard northbound through 71 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard southbound left 76 seconds
Park Road Powers Boulevard eastbound left 43 seconds
Park Road Powers Boulevard eastbound through 37 seconds
Park Road Powers Boulevard westbound left 48 seconds
Park Road Powers Boulevard westbound right 41 seconds
The following movements are expected to operate at LOS F under the 2030 no build
scenario
May 2011 28
1
287
Kimley Horn Walmart Store 5949 00
Traffic Impact Analysis and Associates Inc Chanhassen Minnesota
r
J
f
At the Arboretum Boulevard intersection the through movements on Arboretum
Boulevard are maintained at LOS D or C with lower LOS on Powers Boulevard the
lower volume side street The northbound left turn queue is anticipated to spillback from
the 230 left turn lane with a 95 percentile queue of 332 feet Access to the left turn lane
is also anticipated to be blocked with a 95 percentile queue of 394 feet in the adjacent
through lane Lane blocking may also occur on the westbound approach with a 630 foot
left turn lane and a 673 foot 95 percentile queue in the adjacent through lane The 95
percentile queue for the eastbound left turn is 470 feet compared to a storage length of
550 feet While the 95 percentile queue is contained within the storage length there is
little length remaining in which vehicles can decelerate This results in left turning
vehicles decelerating in the adjacent through lane causing additional delay
Table 7 2030 No Build
2030 No Build PM Peak Hour
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard eastbound left 96 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard northbound left 116 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard southbound through 96 seconds
Park Road Powers Boulevard westbound through 61 seconds
Park Road East Driveway northbound left 115 seconds
Park Road East Driveway northbound through 102 seconds
Park Road East Driveway northbound right 100 seconds
r
J
f
At the Arboretum Boulevard intersection the through movements on Arboretum
Boulevard are maintained at LOS D or C with lower LOS on Powers Boulevard the
lower volume side street The northbound left turn queue is anticipated to spillback from
the 230 left turn lane with a 95 percentile queue of 332 feet Access to the left turn lane
is also anticipated to be blocked with a 95 percentile queue of 394 feet in the adjacent
through lane Lane blocking may also occur on the westbound approach with a 630 foot
left turn lane and a 673 foot 95 percentile queue in the adjacent through lane The 95
percentile queue for the eastbound left turn is 470 feet compared to a storage length of
550 feet While the 95 percentile queue is contained within the storage length there is
little length remaining in which vehicles can decelerate This results in left turning
vehicles decelerating in the adjacent through lane causing additional delay
Table 7 2030 No Build
2030 No Build PM Peak Hour
Lek Turn Operations by Movement
Queues Approach Overall Intersection Lek Through Ril ht Intersection Control Approach 95th Delay Delay Delay Delay Delay
Percentile sec veh LOS sec veh LOS sec veh LOS sec veh LOS sec veh LOS
EB 470 95 6 35 9 D 4 9 A 48 5 D
Arboretum WB 370 65 9 44 1 D 4 4 A 41 1 D Blvd Signal 47 4 0
Powers Blvd NB 330 115 7 71 0 4 6 A 50 7 D
SB 120 76 3 95 5 3 4 A 58 8
EB 0 42 6 36 8 30 6 D 36 8
Park Rd WB 0 47 7 60 5 40 5 43 1 Powers Blvd TWSC TSC NB 45 8 6 A 1 9 A 5 2 A 2 7 A
11 6 8
SB 60 8 4 A 3 3 A 3 7 A 4 1 A
EB 0 2505 D 161 C 25 3 D Park Rd
W8 0 1 9 A 0 5 A 0 7 A East TWSC
NB 0 115 4 102 0 100 3
18 6 C
Driveway SB 0
Park Rd EB 0 2 6 A 2 6 A
West TWSC WB 0 2 6 A 0 5 A 0 9 A
NB 0 6 4 A 3 5 A 7 2 A 6 9 A Driveway SB 0 6 2 A 6 2 A
provem vpum zan n or gnar pnrs Los Hm orerum ano xe
2030 Build Operations
Table 8 provides 2030 LOS results for the build scenario using the previously calculated
2030 background traffic volumes plus trips associated with the Walmart site As with the
2030 no build scenario split optimization was assumed at the intersection of Arboretum
Boulevard and Powers Boulevard with coordination maintained using a 160 second
cycle
3
May 2011 29
288
PPP Kimley Horn Walmart Store 5949 00
Traffic Impact Analysis
and Associates Inc Chanhassen Minnesota
While the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard is anticipated to
operate at LOS D as under the 2030 no build scenario both of the driveways on Park
Road are expected to operate at LOS F This is the result of queuing on the eastbound
approach at the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard as in the 2013 build
scenario With the increase in traffic volumes between 2013 and 2030 the eastbound
Park Road queue at Powers Boulevard is anticipated to block both the east and west
driveways on Park Road At the Arboretum Boulevard intersection LOS is maintained at
a similar level to the 2030 no build scenario but the travel demand at this intersection is
in effect metered by the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard A total of 20
movements are expected to operate at LOS E or F
Table 8 2030 Build
2030 Build PM Peak Hour
Lek Turn Operations by Movement Approach Overall Intersection
Lek Throu h R ht Queues Intersection Control Approach 95th Delay Delay Delay Delay Delay
Percentile sec veh
LOS sec veh LOS sec veh LOS LOS
sec veh sec veh LOS
ER 490 105 0 47 1 D 5 5 A 55 6
Arboretum WB 635 75 6 56 3 5 0 A 52 3 D
Blvd Signal NO 325 86 0 59 0 4 5 A 40 8 D
51 4 D
Powers Blvd 58 115 76 6 91 4 3 5 A 57 7
ES 190 191 3 26 5 D 9 4 A 127 9
Park Rd W8 0 155 1 173 1 129 6 138 4 29 3 D Powers Blvd TWSC NB 80 12 7 B 2 4 A 5 5 A 4 0 A
5B 70 10 1 B 3 4 A 5 2 A 4 8 A
EB 0 186 2 40 5 185 5
Park Rd W8 0 0 6 A 1 1 A 0 7 A
125 7 Ea TWSC NO 0 5729 1 5092 5
Driveway 5B 0 9 2 n 9 2 A
Ell 0 283 7 253 9 298 9 i 255 1
Park Rd WB 20 2 2 A 0 2 A 0 S A 0 8 A 251 2 West TWSC
NB 0 677 3 965 0 899 1
Driveway SB 500 1468 9 2 0 A 1436 3
Impmusmenl A Optimization of Signal Splits @ Arboretum and Powers
2030 Build Operations with Signal Installation
Table 9 provides 2030 LOS results for the build scenario assuming the installation of a
signal at the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard The simulation assumes
an optimized timing plan at Park Road and Powers Boulevard with the signal operating
with an 80 second cycle length half that of the 160 second cycle at Arboretum
Boulevard and Powers Boulevard to allow for coordination with the optimized splits at
the major intersection All intersections within the study area are anticipated to operate at
LOS D or better during PM peak period with the two unsignalized intersections on Park
Road operating at LOS A Similar to the 2030 no build scenario a total of six
movements are expected to operate at LOS E or F with average delays per vehicle for the
LOS E intersections summarized as follows
May 2011 30
289
J
Kimley Horn
and Associates Inc
Walmart Store 5949 00
Traffic Impact Analysis
Chanhassen Minnesota
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard westbound left 72 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard northbound through 65 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard southbound left 79 seconds
The following movements are expected to operate at LOS F under the 2030 build
scenario with signal installation
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard eastbound left 104 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard northbound left 122 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard southbound through 113 seconds
As with the 2030 build scenario operations at the Arboretum Boulevard intersection are
expected to remain around the 2030 no build levels Left turn lane spillback is
anticipated on the northbound approach where the 95 percentile queue is 395 feet The
left turn lane will also be blocked by the 479 foot queue in the adjacent northbound
through lane Some blocking will also occur on the westbound approach which has a
630 foot left turn lane but the 95 percentile queue in the adjacent lane is 795 feet Also
there is little space for deceleration in the eastbound and westbound left turn lanes The
95 1t percentile queues for the westbound and eastbound left turns are 605 feet and 465
feet respectively compared to storage lengths of 630 feet and 550 feet respectively
At the signalized intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard all movements are
anticipated to operate at LOS D or better With the signal in place queues are anticipated
to clear during most cycles allowing the northbound right turn movement at the east
driveway to operate at LOS A
Table 9 2030 Build
2030 Build with Signal PM Peak Hour
Lek Turn Operations by Movement
Intersection Control Approach Queues Approach Overall Intersection
LeIt Through Ril ht
95th Delay Delay Delay Delay Delay
Percentile sec h LOS LOS LOS sec veh LOS sec veh LOS sec veh LOS
EB 465 1040 48 0 D 5 5 A 55 7 Arboretum
WB 605 72 0 52 6 D 4 9 A 49 0 D Blvd Bl Signal NO 395 122 1 64 5 6 6 A 50 2 D
53 3 D
Powers Blvd
SB 120 78 5 112 9 5 0 A 68 3
EB 200 30 6 C 19 2 B 4 2 A 21 2 C
Park Rd WB 0 45 0 D 50 8 D 26 4 C 32 6 C Powers Blvd Signal NO 140 35 2 D 15 7 B 6 5 A 1802 B
17 2 8
SB 100 29 0 C 7 3 A 6 5 A 93 A
EB 0 2 6 A 0 9 A 2 6 A Park Rd
WB 0 0 7 A 0 6 A 0 6 A
Ea TWSC NB 0 18 1 C 18 1 C
2 1 A
Driveway SB D 5 0 A 5 0 A
EB 0 2 7 A 0 7 A 1 4 A 0 9 A Park Rd
WB 40 2 5 A 0 3 A 0 5 A 0 9 A
Wes TWSC NB 0 7 2 A 6 5 A 5 0 A 5 8 A 5 1 A
Dri vewa y 58 145 12 8 8 3 0 A 12 4 B
Improvement A Optimization of Signal Splits @ Arboretum and Pursers
Improvement B Signal Installation @ Park and Po s
May 2011 31
290
P Kimley Horn
and Associates Inc
Walmart Store 5949 00
Traffic Impact Analysis
Chanhassen Minnesota
2030 Build Operations with Signal Installation and Dual Left Turn Lanes
Table 10 provides 2030 LOS results for the build scenario assuming the signal
installation split optimization and the construction of double left turn lanes on both the
eastbound and westbound approaches on Arboretum Boulevard
All intersections within the study area are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better
during PM peak period with the two unsignalized intersections on Park Road operating
at LOS A Similar to existing conditions a total of six movements are expected to
operate at LOS E with average delays per vehicle for the LOS E intersections
summarized as follows
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard eastbound left 80 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard westbound left 67 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard northbound left 77 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard northbound through 57 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard southbound left 76 seconds
Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard southbound through 76 seconds
As with the 2030 build scenario operations at the Arboretum Boulevard intersection are
expected to remain around the 2030 no build levels Left turn lane spillback and blocking
is still anticipated on the northbound approach with a 95 percentile queue of 347 feet
for the left turn movement and 333 feet for the through movement The left turn lane is
230 feet long and could not be lengthened without shortening the southbound left turn
lane at the Park Road and Powers Boulevard intersection Lane blocking is also
anticipated on the westbound approach where the left turn lane is 630 feet long and the
95 percentile queue in the adjacent through lane is 709 feet With the addition of the
turn lanes approximately 300 feet of storage length is available for deceleration in the
eastbound and westbound left turn lanes
1
May 2011 3
291
Kimley Horn
and Associates Inc
Table 10 2030 Build with Improvements
Walmart Store 5949 00
Traffic Impact Analysis
Chanhassen Minnesota
2030 Build with Signal PM Peak Hour
Left Turn Operations by Movement
Intersection Control Approach Queues
Approach Overall Intersection
Left Throu h Rl ht
95th Delay Delay Delay Delay Delay
Percentile sec veh LOS sec veh LOS sec veh LOS sec veh LOS se4veh LOS
EB 190 79 5 39 8 D 5 4 A 45 0 D
Arboretum WB 340 66 7 43 8 D 4 6 A 42 1 D
Blvd
Powers Blvd
Signal
NB 345 76 7 57 2 6 4 A 38 9 D
43 0 D
58 120 76 2 76 4 3 3 A 50 4 D
EB 200 31 1 C 18 7 B 4 1 A 21 6 C
Park Rd WB 0 43 6 D 49 5 D 25 1 C 31 3 C Powers Btvd Signal NB 135 34 8 C 16 0 B 6 6 A 184 8
17 3 8
SB 105 27 6 C 7 6 A 7 3 A 9 7 A
EB 0 2 8 A 1 1 A 2 8 A Park Rd
WB 0 0 7 A 0 6 A 007 A
East TWSC
NB 0 21 9 C 21 9 C
2 2 A
Driveway SB 0 4 3 A 4 3 A
EB 0 2 9 A 0 7 A 0 5 A 0 9 A
ParkRd
WB 35 1 2 4 A 0 3 A 0 6 A 0 9 A
West TWSC
NB 0 6 6 A 7 2 A 5 0 A 5 6 A
47 A
Driveway
SB 130 11 4 B 2 6 A 11 1 B
Improvement A Optimization of Signal Splits @ Arboretum and Powers
Improvement B Signal Installation @ Park and Powers
Improvement C Eastbound Double Left @ Arboretum and Powers
Improvement D Westbound Double Left @ Arboretum and Powers
33
292
7 1 Kimle Y Horn Walmart Store 5949 00
Traffic Impact Analysis and Associates Inc Chanhassen Minnesota
Signal Warrant Analysis
As demonstrated in the previous section signal installation has the potential to
significantly improve operations on Park Road and the following section discusses signal
warrant analysis methodology using the 13 hour count conducted at Park Road and
Powers Boulevard
Under the 2013 build scenario which includes background traffic plus Walmart trips a
total of six hours are met for Warrant I and two hours are met for Warrant 1B
Additionally two analysis hours are within 20 vehicles of satisfying Warrant IA In all
cases the heaviest side street approach is the eastbound approach to the intersection
excluding right turning vehicles Table 11 presents the results for Warrants I and 1B
Table 11 2013 Sianal Warrant Analysis
Time Period
Powers Blvd
NB S11 Traffic
Major Approach s
Park Road
Traffic
Minor Approach
Warrant t Warren l2 Warrant 3
1A 18
Major Vol I Minor Vol Met Major Vol Minor Vol Met Minor Vol Met Minor Vol Met
600 700 400 81 600 1 200 900 100 517
7 00 8 00 869 59 600 1 200 900 100 274 482
8 00 9 00 761 84 600 200 900 100 326 540
900 10 00 526 98 600 200 900 100 447
1000 11 00 496 157 600 200 900 100
11 00 12 00 1 631 222 600 200 YES 900 100 604
12 00 13 00 804 218 600 200 YES 900 100 274 482
1300 649 160 600 200 900 100 604
14 00 15 00 682 180 600 200 900 100 604
15 00 1600 882 230 600 200 YF 900 100 482
16 00 17 00 916 258 600 200 YE5 900 100 YES 427
17 00 18 00 1107 273 600 1 200 1 YES 900 100 YES 332
18 00 19 00 654 235 500 1 200 1 YES 900 1 100 604
Hours Met
Hours Required
Condition Met
6 2 0 0
8 8 4 4
NO NO NO NO
In order to add in the additional trips associated with the surrounding parcels daily trip
generation values were calculated based on each site s anticipated ITE Land Use code as
shown in Table 12 Hourly distribution assumptions were then applied to each rate and
the calculated trips were then added to the appropriate approach at the Park Road and
Powers Boulevard intersection based on the trip distribution values previously discussed
By 2030 including all background traffic associated with general regional growth as well
as the five parcels identified both Warrants IA and 1 B are anticipated to be met as
shown in Table 13
May 2011 34
1
r
t
293
M M M M M M M M M M s M M M M M M M M
0
Ul
Table 12
Off Site Trip Generation
Daily
Pass by Net New
Total Pass by Pass by External
Land Total Pass by Pass by Trips Trips Tri
Use Land Ilse T Size Units Formula Trig Falter Fait Trilis Enter Exit Total 7 Enter Exit
813 Frec Standing Discount Superstore 120 209 KSF Ln T 1 35 Ln X 2 11 5 300 2 650 2 650 N A 0 0 0 5 300 2 650 2 650
814 Specialty Retail Center 22 350 KSF T 44 32 X 991 496 495 N A 0 0 0 991 496 495
814 Specialty Retail Center 32 800 KSF T 44 32 X 1 454 727 727 N A 0 0 0 1 454 727 727
110 General Light Industrial 221 000 KSF T 7 47 X 101 92 1 549 775 774 N A 0 0 0 1 549 775 774
630 Clinic 28 980 KSF T 31 45 X 911 456 455 N A 0 0 0 911 456 455
710 General Office 948 000 KSF Ln T 0 77 Ln X 3 65 7 539 3 770 3 769 0 0 0 0 7 539 3 770 3 769
820 Shopping Center 406 000 KSF Ln T 0 65 Ln X 5 83 16 884 8 442 8 442 0 0 0 0 16 884 8 442 8 442
210 Single Farnily Single Family Detached Housing 132 000 Acres T 26 04 3 437 1 719 1 718 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 3 437 1 1 719 1 718
31 191 15 597 15 594 N A 0 0 0 31 191 15 597 15 594
4
2
D CD
n
n
v
U
n
J
7
3 @ W
J @
n
m
yyy ii
D 4A Cp
J y O J p v
294
P d Kimle I Horn W a lm art Store
t Analysis Y TrafficlmpactAnalysis and Associates Inc Chanhassen Minnesota
Table 13 2030 Signal Warrant Analysis
Time Period
Powers Blvd
NB SB Traffic
Major Approaches
Park Road
EB Traffic
Minor Approach
Warrant 1
1A 1B
Major Vol Minor Vol Met Major Vol Minor Vol Met
6 00 7 00 480 93 600 200
Met
900 100
89
7 00 8 00 1090 73 600 200 900 100
8 00 9 00 1176 105 600 200
200
900 100 YES
9 00 10 00 841 126 600 200
8 00 9 00
900 100
600
10 00 11 00 856 198 600 1 200 900 100
11 00 12 00 1060 279 600 200 YES 900 100 1 YES
12 00 13 00 1309 273 600 200 YES 900 100 1 YES
13 00 14 00 1129 229 600 200 YES 900 100 YES
14 00 15 00 1098 231 600 200 YES 900 100 YES
15 00 16 00 1322 292 600 200 YES 900 100 YES
16 00 17 00 1353 327 600 200 YES 900 100 YES
17 00 18 00 1672 1 345 600 1 200 YES 900 100 YES
18 00 19 00 1034 1 291 600 1 200 YES 900 100 YES
Hours Met
Hours Required
Condition Met
8 9
8 8
YES YES
In order to identify the sensitivity of the signal warrants to the timeline of surrounding
development a 2015 analysis was conducted including all traffic associated with the two
additional parcels on Park Road Land Use Code 814 By adding the trips associated
with these parcels to the trips generated by the Walmart site and general background
growth of 0 5 percent between 2013 and 2015 it is anticipated that Warrant IA will be
met as shown in Table 14
Table 14 2015 Signal Warrant Analysis
Time Period
Powers BWd
NB SB Traffic
Major Approaches
Park Road
EB Traffic
Minor Approach
Warrant 1 Warrant 2 Warrant 3
1A I 18
Major Vol Minor Vol Met Major Vol Minor Vol Met Minor Vol Met I Minor Vol Met
6 00 7 00 415 89 600 200 900 100
7 00 8 00 902 72 600 200 900 100
8 00 9 00 804 104 600 200 900 100
9 00 10 00 578 125 600 200 900 100
10 00 11 00 570 196 600 200 900 100
11 00 1200 706 275 600 200 YES 900 100
12 00 13 00 881 269 600 200 YES 900 100
1300 1400 718 226 600 200 1 YES 900 1 100
14 00 1500 770 228 600 200 YES 900 100
15 00 16 00 977 288 600 200 YES 900 100 YES
16 00 17 00 1013 323 600 200 YES 900 100 YES
17 00 18 00 1213 341 600 200 YES 900 100 YES
18 00 1900 728 286 600 200 YES 900 100
Hours Met
Hours Required
Condition Met
8 3
8 8 4 4
YES NO
Given that trips associated with the Walmart site will nearly satisfy Warrant I in 2013
that additional development on Park Road will likely generate sufficient traffic to satisfy
Warrant IA in the short term and that a signal at the intersection of Park Road and
Powers Boulevard will significantly improve local operations with additional traffic on
Park Road signal installation is recommended as part of the development of the Walmart
site
May 2011 36
295
1
t
I
Klmley Horn Walmart Store 5949 00
Traffic Impact Analysis i and Associates Inc Chanhassen Minnesota
RECOMMENDATIONS
With the construction of Walmart Store 5949 00 near the southwest quadrant of the
Arboretum Boulevard Trunk Highway 5 Powers Boulevard CSAH 17 intersection in
Chanhassen Minnesota it is recommended that the intersection of Park Road and Powers
Boulevard be converted from side street stop control to signal control Without stopping
the northbound and southbound traffic on Powers Boulevard there will not be enough
gaps for the eastbound traffic on Park Road to enter the intersection Queues on Park
Road will in turn prevent vehicles from exiting from the east driveway onto Park Road
In addition the splits at the signal for the Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard
intersection should be retimed to efficiently serve the new turning movement distribution
By incorporating the recommended modifications the street network will operate at
similar levels to existing conditions
In the long term the City should monitor the growth of the surrounding area If the area
develops as anticipated by the City consideration should be given to adding a second left
turn lane on the eastbound and westbound Arboretum Boulevard approaches to Powers
Boulevard Queues for these movements are not expected to spill out of the turn lane but
with the forecasted growth and development would result in left turning drivers
decelerating in the adjacent through lane and causing delays for through movements
Dual left turn lanes would shorten queues as well as delays
Iay 2 J 1 1 37
296
t
t
APPENDIX
297
t
t
Appendix A
Raw Turning Movement Volume Counts
298
TRAFFIC DATA INC
Arboretum Blvd Powers Blvd
Chanhassen MN
Traffic Data Inc
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park MN 55416
rni inc Prin4orl lacc 1 Himnviv ohirlac
File Name 1241131 Arboretum Powers
Site Code 1241131
Start Date 2 8 2011
Page No 1
05 00 PM 59
Powers Blvd
28 0 143
Arboretum Blvd
286 31
Powers Blvd
395 55 79
Arboretum Blvd
0 158 9 218
Southbound
0 299 995
Westbound
63 45 25
Northbound
133 60 319 29
Eastbound
408 36 60
Start Time Rght Thru Left Peds App Total Rght Thru Left Peds App Total Rght Thru Left Peds App Total Rght Thru Left Reds App Total Int Total
Factor 1 0 1 0 1 0
110
1 0
173
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
05 45 PM
1 0 1 0 1 1 0
0
1 0
82
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
29 44
04 00 PM 53 45 16 0 114 52 256 21 0 329 41 69 12 0 122 7 191 43 0 241 806
04 15 PM 60 39 22 0 121 54 253 27 0 334 28 64 13 0 105 2 166 46 0 214 774
04 30 PM 52 39 19 0 110 57 285 24 0 366 41 51 12 0 104 6 184 29 0 219 799
04 45 PM 1 48 43 21 0 112 1 67 293 31 0 391 1 30 69 18 0 117 6 146 41 0 193 1 813
Total 1 213 166 78 0 457 1 230 1087 103 0 1420 1 140 253 55 0 448 21 687 159 0 867 1 3192
05 00 PM 59 56 28 0 143 78 286 31 0 395 55 79 24 0 158 9 218 72 0 299 995
05 15 PM 63 45 25 0 133 60 319 29 0 408 36 60 15 0 111 9 178 55 0 242 894
05 30 PM 44 59 37 0 140 64 344 46 0 454 29 65 16 0 110 5 173 52 0 230 934
05 45 PM 54 45 30 0 129 82 298 27 0 407 29 44 14 0 87 8 160 38 0 206 829
Total 220 205 120 0 545 284 1247 133 0 1664 149 248 69 0 466 31 729 217 0 977 3652
Grand Total 433 371 198 0 1002 514 2334 236 0 3084 289 501 124 0 914 52 1416 376 0 1844 6844
Apprch 43 2 37 19 8 0 16 7 75 7 7 7 0 31 6 54 8 13 6 0 2 8 76 8 20 4 0
Total 6 3 5 4 2 9 0 14 6 7 5 34 1 3 4 0 45 1 4 2 7 3 1 8 0 13 4 0 8 20 7 5 5 0 26 9
Class 1 430 364 195 0 989 511 2304 230 0 3045 278 496 123 0 897 50 1378 372 0 1800 6731
Class 1 99 3 98 1 98 5 0 98 7 99 4 98 7 97 5 0 98 7 96 2 99 99 2 0 98 1 96 2 97 3 98 9 0 97 6 98 3
Heavy Vehicles
Heavy Vehicles 0 7 1 9 1 5 0 1 3 0 6 1 3 2 5 0 1 3 3 8 1 0 8 0 1 9 3 8 2 7 1 1 0 2 4 1 7
299
TRAFFIC DATA INC
Arboretum Blvd Powers Blvd
Chanhassen MN
Traffic Data Inc
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park MN 55416
File Name 1241131 Arboretum Powers
Powers Blvd
1241131
Start Date 2 8 2011
Page No
Out In Total
989 2368
12 13 25 P 1 1379 391 2393
430 364 195 0
3 7 3 0
4331 3711 1981 0
Rght T Left Peds ju
F C CO M M J Q 11 C
North
E F n Cl i
C 2 F 2 8 2011 04 00 PM
W w 2 o o a
o
m
m O N N 2 8 2011 05 45 PM o 3 in in L r A Cn
a Class 1 r
Heavy Vehicles O N ro 0 0 o N
Z m
D
aom nn
T r
Left Thru R ht Peds
123 496 278 0
1 5 11 0
1241 5011 89 0
659 914 1573
Out In Total
File Name 1241131 Arboretum Powers
Site Code 1241131
Start Date 2 8 2011
Page No 2
I 300
Traffic Data Inc
TRAFFIC D A T A i N c 3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park MN 55416
Arboretum Blvd Powers Blvd
Chanhassen MN
File Name 1241131 Arboretum Powers
Site Code 1241131
Start Date 2 8 2011
Page No 3
Powers Blvd Arboretum Blvd Powers Blvd Arboretum Blvd
Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound
Start Time Rght Thru Left Peds App Total Rght Thru Left Peds App Total Rght Thru Left Peds App Total Rght Thru Left Peds App Total Int Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 04 00 PM to 05 45 PM Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05 00 PM
05 00 PM 59 56 28 0 143 78 286 31 0 395 55 79 24 0 158 9 218 72 0 299 995
05 15 PM 63 45 25 0 133 60 319 29 0 408 36 60 15 0 111 9 178 55 0 242 894
05 30 PM 44 59 37 0 140 64 344 46 0 454 29 65 16 0 110 5 173 52 0 230 934
05 45 PM 54 45 30 0 129 82 298 27 0 407 29 44 14 0 87 8 160 38 0 206 829
Total Volume 220 205 120 0 545 284 1247 133 0 1664 149 248 69 0 466 31 729 217 0 977 3652
301
Y
TRAFFIC DATA INC
Arboretum Powers Heavy Vehicles
Chanhassen MN
Traffic Data Inc
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park MN 55416
rni me Drin4orl I lowv ohirloc
File Name 1241131 Arboretum Powers
Site Code 1241131
Start Date 2 8 2011
Page No 1
05 00 PM 1
Powers Blvd
0 0 1
Arboretum Blvd
3 1
Powers Blvd
4 1 0
Arboretum Blvd
0 1 0 5
Southbound
0 5
Westbound
05 15 PM 0 1
Northbound
0 1 1 3
Eastbound
0 5 3
Start Time Rght Thru Left Peds App Total Rght Thru Left
5
Peds App Total Rght Thru Left Peds App Total Rght Thru Left
1
Peds App 7otai Int Total
Factor 1 0 1 0 1 0
3
1 0
5
1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
0
1 0
0
1 0 1 0 1 1 0
3
1 0
0 0
04 00 PM 1 3 1 0 5 0 7 0 0 7 1 1 0 0 2 0 8 2 0 10 24
04 15 PM 1 1 2 0 4 1 4 1 0 6 1 1 1 0 3 0 7 1 0 8 21
04 30 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 3 0 5 0 0 5 13
04 45 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 2 0 7 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 2 1 10
Total 1 2 6 3 0 11 1 2 18 3 0 23 1 5 3 1 0 9 1 0 22 3 0 25 1 68
05 00 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 5 11
05 15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 5 3 0 0 0 3 2 3 0 0 5 14
05 30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 4 1 2 0 0 3 0 5 0 0 5 12
05 45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0 4 8
Total 1 1 0 0 2 1 12 3 0 16 6 2 0 0 8 2 16 1 0 19 45
Grand Total 3 7 3 0 13 3 30 6 0 39 11 5 1 0 17 2 38 4 0 44 113
Apprch l 23 1 53 8 23 1 0 7 7 76 9 15 4 0 64 7 29 4 5 9 0 4 5 86 4 9 1 0 I Total 0 2 7 6 2 2 7 0 11 5 2 7 26 5 5 3 0 34 5 9 7 4 4 0 9 0 15 1 8 33 6 3 5 0 38 9
M M M it M M M M M M M M M M M 302
TRAFFIC DATA INC
Arboretum Powers Heavy Vehicles
Chanhassen MN
File Name 1241131 Arboretum Powers
Site Code 1241131
Start Date 2 8 2011
Page No 2
Traffic Data Inc
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park MN 55416
Powers Blvd
Out In Total
12 13 25
31 7 3 0
Rght Thru Le Peds
m
a North D
CD 7
E C
L
F 2 p
O
D
2 8 2011 04 00 PM 3 2 8 20 11 05 45 PM
r
w
m
a M
N
Heavv Vehicles
CD o
a o
d
I F
Left Thru R ht Peds
1 5 11 0
15 17 32
Out In Total
Traffic Data Inc
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park MN 55416
303
TRAFFIC DATA JNC
Arboretum Powers Heavy Vehicles
Chanhassen MN
Traffic Data Inc
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park MN 55416
File Name 1241131 Arboretum Powers
Site Code 1241131
Start Date 2 8 2011
Page No 3
NeaK Flour Analysis From u4 uu NM to uo 4o F m veaK l oT 1
Powers Blvd
Southbound
Arboretum Blvd
Westbound
Powers Blvd
Northbound
Arboretum Blvd
Eastbound
Start Time Rght I Thru I Left I Peds I App Total Rght I Thru I Left I Peds I App Total Rght I Thru I Left I Pads I App Total Rght Thru I Left I Peds I App Total
NeaK Flour Analysis From u4 uu NM to uo 4o F m veaK l oT 1
Peak Hour for Entire
0
Intersection Begins at 04 00 PM
04 00 PM 1 1 3 1 0 5
04 15 PM 0 1 1 2 0 4
04 30 PM
0
0 2 0 0 2
04 45 PM
2
0 0 0 0 0
Total Volume
2
2 6 3 0 11
0 7 0 0 7 1 1 0 0
1 4 1 0 6 1 1 1 0
0 3 0 0 3 2 1 0 0
1 4 2 0 7 1 0 0 0
2 18 3 0 23 5 3 1 0
7 78 3 13 0 55 6 33 3 11 1 0
0 643 375 000 821 625 750 250 000
2 0 8 2 0
3 0 7 1 0
3 0 5 0 0
1 0 2 0 0
9 0 22 3 0
Int Total
10 24
8 21
5 13
2 10
25 68
304
Traffic Data Inc
3268 Xenwood Avenue South ruaffrc nara N
St Louis Park MN 55416
Park Rd Powers Blvd
Chanhassen MN
rniinc PrintArl lacc 1
File Name 1241132 Park Powers
Site Code 1241132
Start Date 2 8 2011
Page No 1
07 00 AM 17
Powers Blvd
9 0 70 0
Park Rd
1 0 2
Powers Blvd
55 13 0 74
Park Rd
0 1 0 3 149
Southbound
14 56 5
Westbound
75 2 0
Northbound
0 3 4 74
Eastbound
1 100 4
Start Time Rght Thru Left Peds App Total Rght Thru Left
6
Peds App Total Rght Thru Left Peds App Total Rght Thru Left Peds App Total Int Total
Factor 1 0 1 0 1 0
6
1 0
07 45 AM
1 0 1 0 1 0
0
1 0
2
1 0 1 0 1 0
3
1 0
67
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
0 5
06 00 AM 2 30 0 0 32 23 0 15 1 39 1 10 4 0 15 15 2 35 0 52 138
06 15 AM 4 27 4 0 35 4 0 7 0 11 3 32 9 0 44 4 1 13 0 18 108
06 30 AM 8 33 4 0 45 2 0 0 0 2 5 26 9 1 41 2 0 2 0 4 92
06 45 AM 1 13 54 5 0 72 1 2 1 2 0 5 1 10 40 22 0 72 2 0 5 0 7 1 156
Total 1 27 144 13 0 184 1 31 1 24 1 57 1 19 108 44 1 172 23 3 55 0 81 1 494
07 00 AM 17 44 9 0 70 0 1 1 0 2 6 55 13 0 74 2 0 1 0 3 149
07 15 AM 14 56 5 0 75 2 0 1 0 3 4 74 21 1 100 4 0 6 0 10 188
07 30 AM 17 56 6 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 7 85 18 1 111 3 0 3 0 6 196
07 45 AM 20 121 18 0 159 2 0 1 0 3 13 67 32 3 115 7 0 5 0 12 289
Total 68 277 38 0 383 4 1 3 0 8 30 281 84 5 400 16 0 15 0 31 822
08 00 AM 13 81 17 0 111 3 1 0 0 4 13 55 24 0 92 8 0 6 0 14 221
08 15 AM 16 70 12 0 98 5 0 2 0 7 5 50 24 2 81 2 0 2 0 4 190
08 30 AM 15 49 9 0 73 4 1 2 0 7 7 29 12 2 50 2 2 6 0 10 140
08 45 AM 8 43 9 0 60 4 1 2 6 13 6 56 17 3 82 3 1 2 0 6 161
Total 52 243 47 0 342 16 3 6 6 31 31 190 77 7 305 15 3 16 0 34 712
09 00 AM 26 28 9 0 63 5 0 1 0 6 2 35 10 1 48 1 1 4 0 6 123
09 15 AM 10 34 5 0 49 5 0 1 0 6 1 29 11 5 46 2 1 0 0 3 104
09 30 AM 9 26 3 0 38 8 3 0 0 11 4 51 6 1 62 3 0 3 0 6 117
09 45 AM 12 18 8 0 38 7 0 1 0 8 3 39 5 2 49 1 1 3 0 5 100
Total 57 106 25 0 188 25 3 3 0 31 10 154 32 9 205 7 3 10 0 20 444
10 00 AM 6 21 5 0 32 7 3 0 7 17 2 33 4 0 39 2 2 6 0 10 98
10 15 AM 6 30 8 0 44 6 0 3 1 10 0 17 5 3 25 0 0 4 0 4 83
10 30 AM 9 26 5 0 40 6 1 1 2 10 3 25 1 0 29 4 0 7 1 12 91
10 45 AM 11 29 3 3 46 7 3 2 0 12 7 32 6 4 49 3 3 8 0 14 121
Total 32 106 21 3 162 26 7 6 10 49 12 107 16 7 142 9 5 25 1 40 393
11 00 AM 9 25 2 5 41 4 1 2 0 7 1 36 9 6 52 3 0 6 0 9 109
11 15 AM 6 25 3 3 37 4 1 3 0 8 1 59 2 1 63 7 0 20 0 27 135
11 30 AM 11 38 4 0 53 10 0 6 0 16 2 62 0 3 67 12 1 15 0 28 164
11 45 AM 9 36 10 0 55 13 0 2 0 15 3 67 5 2 77 11 2 14 0 27 174
Total 35 124 19 8 186 31 2 13 0 46 7 224 16 12 259 33 3 55 0 91 582
12 00 PM 21 49 2 0 72 15 1 9 0 25 5 67 1 3 76 4 1 20 0 25 198
12 15 PM 15 69 5 0 89 5 0 1 0 6 3 53 5 1 62 5 1 8 0 14 171
12 30 PM 23 65 8 0 96 5 5 2 0 12 2 56 10 1 69 6 2 17 1 26 203
12 45 PM 19 50 7 0 76 6 3 4 0 13 5 41 10 2 58 8 3 5 0 16 163
Total 78 233 22 0 333 31 9 16 0 56 15 217 26 7 265 23 7 50 1 81 735
305
TRAFFIC DATA INC
Park Rd Powers Blvd
Chanhassen MN
Traffic Data Inc
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park MN 55416
Print rl Cl 1
File Name 1241132 Park Powers
Site Code 1241132
Start Date 2 8 2011
Page No 2
02 00 PM 6
Powers Blvd
6 0 60 5
Park Rd
3 0 9
Powers Blvd
41 2 1 48
Park Rd
1 4 0 9 126
Southbound
6 46 5
Westbound
57 5 1
Northbound
0 9 1
Eastbound
4 0 47
Start Time Rght Thru Left Peds
125
App Total Rght Thru Left
0
Peds App Total Rght Thru Left
8
Peds App Total Rght Thru Left
4
Peds App Total Int Total
Factor 1 0 1 0 1 0
55
1 0
0
1 0 1 0 1 0
2
1 0
12
1 0 1 0 1 0
2
1 0
1
1 0 1 0 1 0
7
1 0
Total 26
01 00 PM 17 61 11 0 89 4 2 1 0 7 3 49 4 3 59 5 1 13 1 20 175
01 15 PM 9 41 5 0 55 1 1 1 1 4 3 43 10 4 60 5 3 3 0 11 130
01 30 PM 15 50 10 0 75 2 2 2 0 6 1 36 8 2 47 4 0 5 0 9 137
01 45 PM 1 4 35 6 0 45 1 2 2 0 0 4 1 2 32 3 1 38 2 1 8 0 11 1 98
Total 1 45 187 32 0 264 1 9 7 4 1 21 1 9 160 25 10 204 16 5 29 1 51 1 540
02 00 PM 6 48 6 0 60 5 1 3 0 9 4 41 2 1 48 4 1 4 0 9 126
02 15 PM 6 46 5 0 57 5 1 3 0 9 1 42 4 0 47 6 4 2 0 12 125
02 30 PM 4 56 2 0 62 6 1 0 1 8 1 47 5 3 56 4 3 8 0 15 141
02 45 PM 10 55 8 0 73 6 4 2 0 12 1 34 5 2 42 1 1 5 0 7 134
Total 26 205 21 0 252 22 7 8 1 38 7 164 16 6 193 15 9 19 0 43 526
03 00 PM 6 48 3 0 57 4 0 0 0 4 1 101 6 1 109 14 2 14 0 30 200
03 15 PM 11 54 5 0 70 7 1 4 0 12 3 72 3 0 78 7 1 5 0 13 173
03 30 PM 4 56 4 0 64 6 1 1 0 8 1 83 10 0 94 8 1 9 0 18 184
03 45 PM 2 55 7 0 64 3 0 5 0 8 2 77 3 3 85 8 4 9 0 21 178
Total 23 213 19 0 255 20 2 10 0 32 7 333 22 4 366 37 8 37 0 82 735
04 00 PM 10 52 6 0 68 7 1 8 0 16 4 78 5 2 89 13 0 17 0 30 203
04 15 PM 3 58 3 0 64 4 1 4 0 9 2 68 6 0 76 13 1 9 0 23 172
04 30 PM 8 55 5 0 68 5 2 5 0 12 2 95 7 0 104 17 0 13 0 30 214
04 45 PM 17 65 3 0 85 18 1 5 0 24 1 88 8 2 99 16 1 14 0 31 239
Total 38 230 17 0 285 34 5 22 0 61 9 329 26 4 368 59 2 53 0 114 828
05 00 PM 15 73 6 0 94 27 2 8 0 37 2 115 14 0 131 24 1 17 0 42 304
05 15 PM 9 64 14 0 87 15 3 16 0 34 4 88 11 0 103 15 1 18 0 34 258
05 30 PM 27 73 11 0 111 8 0 7 0 15 6 93 29 1 129 17 1 10 0 28 283
05 45 PM 16 50 4 0 70 8 1 7 0 16 4 76 16 0 96 14 1 9 0 24 206
Total 67 260 35 0 362 58 6 38 0 102 16 372 70 1 459 70 4 54 0 128 1051
06 00 PM 4 42 6 0 52 31 1 20 0 52 0 69 2 0 71 33 2 46 0 81 256
06 15 PM 3 43 1 0 47 9 1 6 0 16 2 53 2 0 57 13 0 12 0 25 145
06 30 PM 2 46 1 0 49 3 0 3 0 6 1 45 7 1 54 11 1 4 0 16 125
06 45 PM 11 49 0 0 60 2 0 1 0 3 1 52 10 0 63 4 0 7 0 11 137
Total 20 180 8 0 208 45 2 30 0 77 4 219 21 1 245 61 3 69 0 133 663
Grand Total 568 2508 317 11 3404 352 55 183 19 609 176 2858 475 74 3583 384 55 487 3 929 8525
Apprch 16 7 73 7 9 3 0 3 57 8 9 30 3 1 4 9 79 8 13 3 2 1 41 3 5 9 52 4 0 3
Total 6 7 29 4 3 7 0 1 39 9 4 1 0 6 2 1 0 2 7 1 2 1 33 5 5 6 0 9 42 4 5 0 6 5 7 0 10 9
306
TRAFFIC DATA JNC
Park Rd Powers Blvd
Chanhassen MN
Traffic Data Inc
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park MN 55416
File Name 1241132 Park Powers
Site Code 1241132
Start Date 2 8 2011
Page No 3
Powers Blvd
Out In Total
3697 F 34041 F 7101
5681 2508 317 11
Rght Thru Left Peds
r
F O N J J I Cl
N O
North
K c H f N m
y 2 8 2011 06 00 AM o F
d v
t 2 8 2011 06 45 PM a
t o H
Class 1 o d m
i T r
Left Thru R ht Peds
475 2858 176 74
3075 735873 76658
Out In Total
307
Ar x N 0I
TRAFFIC DATA JNC
Park Rd Powers Blvd
Chanhassen MN
Traffic Data Inc
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park MN 55416
File Name 1241132 Park Powers
Site Code 1241132
Start Date 2 8 2011
Page No 4
Int Total
Peak Hour Analysis 1 rom U i UU AM to U 4b AM FIealc 1 OT I
Powers Blvd
Southbound
Park Rd
Westbound
Powers Blvd
Northbound
Park Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Rght I Thru I Left I Peds I App Total Rght Thru I Left I Peds I App Total Rght I Thru I Left I Peds I App Total Rght Thru I Left I Peds App Total Int Total
Peak Hour Analysis 1 rom U i UU AM to U 4b AM FIealc 1 OT I
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07 00 AM
07 00 AM 17 44 9 0 70 0 1 1 0 2 6 55 13 0 74 2 0 1 0 3 149
07 15 AM 14 56 5 0 75 2 0 1 0 3 4 74 21 1 100 4 0 6 0 10 188
07 30 AM 17 56 6 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 7 85 18 1 111 3 0 3 0 6 196
07 45 AM 20 121 18 0 159 2 0 1 0 3 13 67 32 3 115 7 0 5 0 12 289
Total Volume 68 277 38 0 383 4 1 3 0 8 30 281 84 5 400 16 0 15 0 31 822
308
YI
TRAFFIC DATA INC
Park Rd 1001 Park Rd East Driveway
Chanhassen MN
Traffic Data Inc
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park MN 55416
r rnuns Printed r lacc 1
File Name 1241133 Park East Driveway
Site Code 1241133
Start Date 2 8 2011
Page No 1
Park Rd East Driveway Park Rd
Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound
Start Time Rght Thru Left Peds App Total Rght Thru Left Peds App Total Rght Thru Left Peds App Total Rght Thru Left Peds App Total Int Total
Factor 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
04 00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 1 0 19 4 0 1 1 6 0 25 0 0 25 50
04 15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 5 0 0 0 5 1 18 0 0 19 34
04 30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 3 0 16 3 0 0 0 3 0 26 0 0 26 45
04 45 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 26 3 0 29 1 6 0 1 2 9 1 1 29 0 1 31 1 69
Total 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 67 7 0 74 18 0 2 3 23 1 2 98 0 1 101 1 198
05 00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 2 0 30 9 0 1 0 10 0 36 0 0 36 76
05 15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 9 0 23 5 0 1 0 6 0 25 0 0 25 54
05 30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 18 0 57 4 0 1 0 5 0 26 0 0 26 88
05 45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 9 0 32 7 0 1 0 8 1 18 0 0 19 59
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 38 0 142 25 0 4 0 29 1 105 0 0 106 277
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 171 45 0 216 43 0 6 3 52 3 203 0 1 207 475
Apprch 0 0 0 0 0 79 2 20 8 0 82 7 0 11 5 5 8 1 4 98 1 0 0 5
To 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 9 5 0 45 5 9 1 0 1 3 0 6 10 9 0 6 42 7 0 0 2 43 6
309
TRAFFIC DATA INC
Park Rd 1001 Park Rd East Driveway
Chanhassen MN
File Name 1241133 Park East Driveway
Site Code 1241133
Start Date 2 8 2011
Page No 2
Traffic Data Inc
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park MN 55416
Out In Total
0 0 o
01 0 0 0
Rght Thru Left Peds
M O
J t O A
Cl North
2 c N
H
2 8 2011 04 00 PM
m
m
a r 2 8 2011 05 45 PM x a
O N Class 1
a
a
a
yo
m m ro
I F
Left Thru R ht Peds
61 01 3 3
48 52 100
Out In Total
Fast nrivpwav
Traffic Data Inc
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park MN 55416
310
Traffic Data Inc
TRAFFIC DATA rN 3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park MN 55416
Park Rd 1001 Park Rd East Driveway
Chanhassen MN
File Name 1241133 Park East Driveway
Site Code 1241133
Start Date 2 8 2011
Page No 3
F eaK Hour Analysis From 04 00 FM to 05 45 Fm F eaK 1 of 1
Southbound
Park Rd
Westbound
East Driveway
Northbound
Park Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Rght I Thru I Left I Peds I App Total Rght I Thru I Left I Peds I App Total Rght I Thru I Left I Peds I App Total Rght I Thru I Left I Peds I App Total
F eaK Hour Analysis From 04 00 FM to 05 45 Fm F eaK 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04 45 PM
04 45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 3 0 29 6 0 1 2 9 1 29 0 1
05 00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 2 0 30 9 0 1 0 10 0 36 0 0
05 15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 9 0 23 5 0 1 0 6 0 25 0 0
05 30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 18 0 57 4 0 1 0 5 0 26 0 0
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 32 0 139 24 0 4 2 30 1 116 0 1
Int Total
31 69
36 76
25 54
26 88
18 1 287
311
TRAFFIC DATA INC
Park Rd 1001 Park Rd West Driveway
Chanhassen MN
File Name 1241134 Park West Driveway
Site Code 1241134
Start Date 2 9 2011
Page No 1
Traffic Data Inc
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park MN 55416
05 00 PM 0 0 0 0 0
Park Rd
23 6 0
West Driveway
4 1 3
Park Rd
8 0 20 0 0
Southbound
57
05 15 PM
Westbound
0 0 1
Northbound
1 0 17
Eastbound
0 27 4
Start Time Rght Thru Left Peds App Total Rght Th Left Peds App Total Rght I Th Left Peds App Total Rght Thru Left
0
Peds App Total Int Total
Factor 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
0
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
0
1 0
1 12
04 00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 13 1 0 2 0 3 0 25 0 0 25 41
04 15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 13 3 0 1 0 4 1 14 0 0 15 32
04 30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 4 0 14 2 0 0 0 2 0 31 0 0 31 47
04 45 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 15 4 0 19 1 5 0 0 0 5 1 1 18 0 0 191 43
Total 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 51 8 0 59 1 11 0 3 0 14 1 2 88 0 0 90 1 163
05 00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 6 0 29 4 1 3 0 8 0 20 0 0 20 57
05 15 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 17 10 0 27 4 0 1 0 5 0 21 0 0 21 54
05 30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 12 0 34 5 0 2 0 7 3 18 0 0 21 62
05 45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 12 2 0 15 2 0 0 0 2 0 10 0 0 10 27
Total 0 0 1 0 1 1 74 30 0 105 15 1 6 0 22 3 69 0 0 72 200
Grand Total 0 0 1 0 1 1 125 38 0 164 26 1 9 0 36 5 157 0 0 162 363
Apprch 0 0 100 0 0 6 76 2 23 2 0 I 72 2 2 8 25 0 3 1 96 9 0 0 I Total 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 34 4 10 5 0 45 2 7 2 0 3 2 5 0 9 9 1 4 43 3 0 0 44 6
312
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M i
TRAFFIC DATA INC
Park Rd 1001 Park Rd West Driveway
Chanhassen MN
File Name 1241134 Park West Driveway
Site Code 1241134
Start Date 2 9 2011
Page No 2
Traffic Data Inc
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park MN 55416
Out In Total
0 1 3
0 0 1 0
Rght Thr u Left Peds
N J i
W e H
2 9 2011 04 00 PM
2 m
F
a L 2 9 2011 05 45 PM a
a
Class 1
ao am
EL a
41 T F
Left Thru R ht Peds
91 11 261 0
43 36 79
Out In Total
Traffic Data Inc
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park MN 55416
313
TRAFFIC DATA INC
Park Rd 1001 Park Rd West Driveway
Chanhassen MN
Traffic Data Inc
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
St Louis Park MN 55416
File Name 1241134 Park West Driveway
Site Code 1241134
Start Date 2 9 2011
Page No 3
Int Total
Peak Hour Analysis
Southbound
Park Rd
Westbound
West Driveway
Northbound
Park Rd
Eastbound
Start Time Rght Thru Left Peds App Total Rght Thru Left Peds App Total Rght Thru Left Pads App Total Rght Thru Left Peds App Total Int Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 04 017 PM to 05 45 PM Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04 45 PM
04 45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 4 0 19 5 0 0 0 5 1 18 0 0 19 43
05 00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 6 0 29 4 1 3 0 8 0 20 0 0 20 57
05 15 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 17 10 0 27 4 0 1 0 5 0 21 0 0 21 54
05 30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 12 0 34 5 0 2 0 7 3 18 0 0 21 62
Total Volume 0 0 1 0 1 0 77 32 0 109 18 1 6 0 25 4 77 0 0 81 216
App Total 0 0 100 0 0 70 6 29 4 0 72 4 24 0 4 9 95 1 0 0
PHF 1 000 000 250 000 250 1 000 837 667 000 801 900 250 500 000 781 333 917 000 000 964 871
M M M M r M M M M r M M M M M r M M M 314
t
Appendix B
Volume Development Sheets
315
m m m m m r m m m m m m m m
SUMMARY OF TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES
Arilomtum Blvd Powers Blvd
2013 Build Conditions
Northbound Southbound Fm tband Westbound
NB1 NBT NBR NBII SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU
2011 Turning Mmenuent Count 76 282 155 0 111 208 214 0 220 715 30 0 141 1242 269 0
Initial Back round Growth Rate 0 02 0 02 0 02 002 0 02 002 002 002 072 002 0 02 002 0 02 002 002 002
Years of Growth to Fxo ting
2 2
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Traffic Total 79 292 161 0 115 2i a 222 II 228 741 31 0 146 1287 279 0
Future Background Growth Rate oon 041 0 00 000 000 Orin 1 11 1 01x1 nn0 0 00 0 N 000 000 000 1 00 0 00
Years ofCrowth to Build out 0 I 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ELture Back round Traffic Total 79 292 161 1 115 216 222 0 221 741 31 0 146 1287 279 0
Pro Distribution n
22 1
20
710
18 35
Project Assi nnent 0 n n 0 0 39 0 0 n 0 qs 0 68 0 0 n
Project Distnbuhon Out 18 ra 35
73 0 22 0
Project Ass i nment Out 37 41 71 0 0 0 n 0 n 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
ProjectTrips 37 41 71 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 35 0 68 0 0 0
Pass by Distribution n
10 1 r 10 1 80
30 3 1 40 40
Pass By Assignment n
8
0 0 0 0 n n n n 23 23 0 30 30 0 0
Pass By Distribution Out 30 6
80o loo o
Pass By Ass i nment Out F31 n 24 0 0 0 n n n 0 0 n n n 0 n
Pass B Tri
8
0 24 0 0 0 0 u 0 23 23 0 30 30 0 n
Diverted Trips
Proposed Redistribution
ELnrre TraTc Total 147 33J 256 a 115 255 222 0 22N 718 89 0 1 244 1257 1 279 1 0
St NuLtRYOFTURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES
Paris Rd Powers Blvd
2013 Build Conditions
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBIT EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU
2011 Turning Mm rnent Count 63 384 13 0 34 275 70 0 61 4 75 0 36 6 68 0
Initial Background Growth Rate 0 02 002 002 0 02 002 002 002 002 002 002 0 02 0 02 002 002 002 0 02
Years of Growth to Existing 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Traffic Total 65 399 13 0 35 285 73 0 63 a 78 0 37 6 70 0
Future Background Growth Rate 0 00 000 0n0 nlxl 0 x1 000 000 000 000 01r 000 000 000 000 000 000
Years of Growth to Build out 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
ELmre Back round Traffic Total 65 31 13 0 35 285 73 0 63 4 78 0 37 6 70 0
Pro ect Distribution n 22 1 710
Project Assi omen 4 0 0 0 0 0 142 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Distribution Out 73 0 22 0
Project Assignment Out 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 149 0 45 0 0 0 0 0
Pro Tri 43 0 0 0 0 0 142 0 149 0 45 0 1 0 0 0 0
Pass by Distribution n 10 1 r 10 1 80
Pass 13v Ass i nnpent fln 8 8 0 0 0 8 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass By Distribution Out 80o loo o
Pass By Ass i nntent Out 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 8 0 0 0 n 0
Pass B Tri 8 8 0 0 0 8 61 0 63 0 8 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips
Proposed Redistribution
Plnure Trams Total 116 391 13 0 35 277 276 U 275 4 131 11 1 f 70 I
m m
316
SUMMARYOF TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES
Pack Rd East D riveway
2013 Build Conditions
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU FBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU
2011 Turning Motement Count 4 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 1 0 32 107 0 0
Initial Back round Growth Rate 002 0 02 0 02 002 0 02 0 02 0 02 0 02 0 02 002 0 02 002 0 02 0 02 0 02 0 02
Years of Growth to Existing 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2 2
Traffic Total 4 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 1211 1 0 33 111 0 0
Future Back round Growth Rate 0 00 0 00 1 x O 0 00 n C 0 00 0 00 000 n tx 000 000 0 W n rs11 0 nu 000
Years of Growth to Build out 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0
Future Back round Tragic Total 4 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 1 0 13 III 0 0
Project Distribution n
5 0
32 0 61 fP
Project Ass igntuent n n D 0 0 0 0 n n 0 0 n 0 62 121 0
Project Distribution Out
95 0
20 95 0
10
Project Ass i nntent Out n n 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 194 0 0 0 n 0 0
Pro Tri n 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 194 0 0 0 62 123 0
Pass by Distribution n
5 5
27 o 63
Pass B Ass i nment n n 0 0 rl 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 21 48 n
Pass By Distribution Out
95 5
9 0
Pass By Ass i nnxnt Out n n 0 0 0 n n n n 71 0 n 0 0 0 n
Pms ByTripa 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 71 0 0 11 21 4N 0
Diverted Trips
Proposed Red6 tnbuuon 4
31 0
FLture Traffic Total 0 1 0 25 1 1 0 0 4 1 II 1 0 385 1 11 U 227 1 I o
SUM INLIRY OF TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES
Park Rd West Driveway
2013 Build Conditions
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
NBL NBT I NBR NBIJ SBL SBT SBR SBIJ EBL EBT IBR BBU WBL WBT WBR WBU
2011 Turning Moment Count 6 1 22 Il 1 0 0 0 0 94 4 0 33 78 0 0
Initial Back round Growth Rate 0 02 002 0 02 002 n 02 0 02 i 02 002 002 002 002 0 02 0 02 002 0 02 002
Years of Caowth to Emstin 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2
Traffic Total o 1 23 Il 1 0 II a 11 97 4 0 34 i 81 0 0
Future Back round Growth Rate 000 f 110 000 n 00 00 0 00 000 0 00 Ono 0 fK 0 00 000 0 00
Years ofCfowth to Build out 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Future Background Tragic Total 6 I 23 U 1 1 0 Il 0 97 4 0 34 81 0 0
Pm Distribution In 5 0 32 0
Pmject Assi gnm in n 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 62 0
Pm ect Distribution Out 95 0 3 0 10
Pmject Assignment Out n 0 0 0 194 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 n 4 0 0
PrdectTri 11 II 0 n 194 0 6 0 10 0 0 0 0 4 62 0
Pus By Distribution 5 5 1 5 32
Pass By Assignment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 24 0
Pass By Distribution Out 95 5
Pass By Assignment Out n D 1 0 0 75 0 4 0 0 0 0 n n 0 0 0
Pats B Tri 0 1 0 0 75 0 4 0 4 4 0 0 0 3 24 0
Diverted Trips
Pm posed Redistribution 4 31 0
FStture Traffic Total 11 1 11 0 2111 1 I to 11 14 91 4 0 0 78 Mb II
317
M M M M M M M M M M M
SUMMARY OF TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES
Arboretum Blvd Powers Blvd
2030 Build Conditions
Northbound Southbound Fm tbonnl
Westbound
Westbound
SQL NBT
NEIL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU ERL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU
1011 Turning Mownient Count 76 282 155 0 111 208 214 0 220 715 30 0 141 1242 269 0
Initial Background Growth Rate 0 02 0 02 0 02 0 02 002 0 02 0 02 0 02 0 02 002 002 0 02 002 002 0 02 0 02
Years of Gowrth to basting 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Traffic Total 79 292 161 0 is 2 u 222 II 228 741 31 0 146 1287 279 0
Future Background Growth Rate 0 01 0 01 0 01 001 1 1 001 001 1 0 01 001 0 01 0 01 001 001 001 001
Years ofGowth to Budd out 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17
Off Site Trips 74 118 246 0 0 55 0 0 8 15 17 0 118 0 0 n
Future Background atic l al d 160 435 421 0 125 289 241 11 255 819 51 0 276 1396 303 1 0
Pro Distribut
730 0
18 35
Project Assignment n 43
Pro Assi nnxnt n 0 0 0 D 0 39 0 0 0 0 35 0 68 0 0 0
Pro Distribution Out 18 20 0 35
730 22 0
Project Assi nnnent Out 0
Project Assi nroent Out 37 41 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pro Trips 37 41 71 0 0 1 39 0 0 0 0 35 0 68 0 0 0
Pass by Distribution In
10 80 a
30 6 30 40 40
Pass By Assignment 8
Pass By Assignment In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 23 0 30 30 0 0
Pass By Distribution Out 40 30
80
Assi nent Out Pass By m 0
Pass By Assi nnnent Out
0
0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n tl
Pass ByTrip 31 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 23 0 30 30 0 0
Pro osed Redistnbution
Future Traffic Total 139
Future Traffic Total 228 476 516 0 125 1 328 241 0 255 796 109 0 374 1366 303 0
SUMMARY OF TURNIN G MOVEMENT VOLUM ES
Park Rd Powers Blvd
2030 Build Conditions
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
SQL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU
2011 Turning Mownaent Count or 63 384 13 0 34 275 70 0 61 4 75 0 36 6 68 0
Initial Background Gowth Rate 002 002 002 002 002 002 0 02 002 002 0 02 0 02 0 02 002 0 02 002 0 02
Years of Crowth to Eosun g 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Traffic Total 65 390 13 0 35 285 73 n 63 4 78 0 37 6 70 0
Future Back mund Gowth Rate 0 01 001 0 01 001 001 nol 001 0 01 n01 A01 001 001 001 001 001 0 01
Years of Goweh to Build out 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17
Off Site Tn s 17 323 I6 0 46 102 42 0 49 0 22 0 0 66 0
Flrture Background Trafrc Total 88 30 0 84 411 121 0 117 4 107 0 62 7 142 11
Pro Distribution In 22 0 730 0
Project Assignment n 43 0 0 0 0 0 142 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 n
Pro Distribution Out 730 22 0
Project Assi nnnent Out 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 149 0 45 0 0 0 0 n
Project Trips 43 0 0 0 0 0 1 142 0 149 0 45 0 0 0 0 0
Pass Distribution In 10 10 10 80 a
Pass By Assignment 8 8 0 0 0 8 61 0 0 0 0 n 0
Pass B Distribution Out 80
Assi nent Out Pass By m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 U0 0 0 0
Pass B Tri 8 8 0 0 0 41 61 0 63 0 0 0 0
Proposed Redistnbution
Future Traffic Total 139 749 30 0 84 403 324 11 320 4 142 11
318
SUM MARY OF TURNIN G MOVENI ENT VOLUM ES
Park Rd East Driveway
2030 Build Conditions
Northbound Soulhlaund Eastbound VI esibound
NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU FBL EBT ERR FBU WBI WB7 WBR WBII
2011 Turning Mopement Count 4 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 1 0 32 107 0 0
Inuial Background C Ah Rmt 002 002 002 0 02 0 02 0 02 002 0 02 002 002 002 002 0 02 002 002 0 02
Ycars of G Ah to Ewan g 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Traffic Tot al 4 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 1 U 33 III 0 0
Puture Backgmund Gormh Rate 0 01 001 001 001 001 0 01 001 001 001 0 01 001 001 001 001 001 001
Years of Crowh to BUlld t 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17
Off Site T p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 0 0 59 0 0
Fm pre Back round 1 ramc total 4 0 27 U 0 0 0 0 0 201 1 0 36 ISn 0 0
Pmject Distribution In
5 Pio
320 61 m
Pmject Assi nimnt n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 123 0
Project Distribution Om
95 0
20 950
20
Project Assi content Our 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 194 0 0 0 0 0 0
Prdect Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 194 1 0 1 0 1 62 123 0
Pass by Distribution In
S 5
27 63
Pass By Assinment In 0 0 0 0 n 0 fl 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 48 0
Pass By Distribution Out
95 5
9 P o
Pass B Assi nn t Out 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pm s By Tri 1z 0 0 0 I 0 D U 0 0 71 0 0 0 21 48 0
Pm posed Redistribution 4 36 36
Fn u c Traffic Total 1 I 0 27 0 U 0 4 1 0 n 1 466 1 0 U 299 171 1
SUMMARY OF TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES
Park Rd West Driveway
2030 Build Conditions
Northbound Southim d Fastbound Wes bound
NBI NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SRR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU N BL WBT WBR WBII
2011 Turning Mownlent Cown to 6 1 22 0 1 0 0 0 0 94 4 0 33 78 0 0
Initial Background G mh Ratc 002 002 002 002 002 0 02 002 0 02 002 002 002 002 0 02 002 002 0 02
Years of Ctopmh to EVStln 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
TrAk Total 6 1 23 0 1 0 0 n 0 97 4 0 34 81 0 1
Future Backgmund Co Al Rate 0 01 001 001 001 001 0 01 001 001 001 001 001 0 01 001 001 001 0 01
Years of Gopmh to Buildow 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 I7 17 17 17
Off Site Tn s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 0 1 59 0 0
Future Background Traffic Total 7 1 25 0 1 U 0 0 0 176 4 0 37 147 0 0
Pmject Distribution In 5 Pio 32 0
Pro ccl Assnnpent n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 62 0
Project Distribution Out 95 0 3 0 20
Pmject Assi mment 0 o 0 0 0 0 194 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
P j t n i rs 0 0 0 0 194 U 1 6 0 1 10 U U 0 0 4 62 0
Pass By Distribution 1n S 5 5 32
Pass By Assi gnntent In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 24 0
Pass B Distnbutron Out 95 5
Pass B Assignment Out 0 0 0 0 75 0 4 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass 6 Tri 0 0 0 0 75 0 4 0 4 4 U 0 0 3 24 U
Pro posed Redistnbuuon 4 36 4
Furore Traffic Total I I 1 25 0 270 0 10 0 14 172 4 U 73 144 86 0
m m m m m m m m m m m i S m m m m m 319
1
I
t
Appendix C
Sim Traffic Reports
320
SimTraffic Performance Report
Delay Veh s 3 7
Vehicles Entered 1101
Denied Entry Before 0
2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
I SimTraffic Report
Page 1
I
Delay Veh s 63 0 21 9 4 4 75 0 34 8 3 9 73 8 68 0 3 2 73 1 66 3 2 9
Vehicles Entered 209 730 30 135 1225 274 74 293 148 106 210 223
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
1 n f t Yi R 1 l overnent I r
a n f Wi1 5
Delay Veh s 36 0
Vehicles Entered 3657
Denied Entry Before 0
I Park Road West Driveway Performance by movement
IUloyerne 6 EBT EWR 1 1tb L WBT NBI NbT NBR SBI
Delay Veh s 0 2 0 3 2 0 0 5 5 5 7 9 2 6 7 1 1 0
Vehicles Entered 96 4 33 81 7 1 24 2 248
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Park Road East Driveway Performance by movement
EBR WBL NBR Iovernett WBT 1kt1 BT
Delay 1 Veh s 0 6 0 1 1 6 0 4 5 7 3 0 0 9
Vehicles Entered 122 1 34 112 3 21 293
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I SimTraffic Report
Page 1
I 321
SimTraffic Performance Report
2011 Existing PM 4 6 201
Total Network Performance
SirnTraffic Report
Page 2
Delay Veh s
Vehicles Entered
Denied Entry Before
44 5
3884
0
SirnTraffic Report
Page 2
322
Queuing and Blocking Report
2011 Existing PM 4 6 2011
Intersection 1 Park Road Powers Boulevard
Directions Served LTR LTR L T L T R
Maximum Queue ft 86 83 48 4 39 3 23
Average Queue ft 35 35 13 0 7 0 1
95th Queue ft 67 65 38 3 26 2 9
Link Distance ft 99 166
340
1152
2
674
Upstream Blk Time 0
48 60
95th Queue ft 309 220
Queuing Penalty veh 0
492 512 33 130 187
Storage Bay Dist ft
90 102
350 225 225
Storage Blk Time
871 871 674 674
Queuing Penalty veh
Upstream Bilk Time
Intersection 2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard
Directions Served L T T L T T R L T T L L
Maximum Queue ft 337 270 296 274 550 578 36 160 201 217 112 119
Average Queue ft 183 129 156 128 340 358 2 69 127 139 48 60
95th Queue ft 309 220 253 225 492 512 33 130 187 209 90 102
Link Distance ft 2014 2014 871 871 674 674
Upstream Bilk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Storage Bay Dist ft 550 630 600 230 250 250
Storage Blk Time 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty veh 0 0 0
Intersection 2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard
SimTraffic Report
Page 3
W
Directions Served T T
Maximum Queue ft 198 183
Average Queue ft 88 104
95th Queue ft 149 158
Link Distance ft 473 473
Upstream Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Storage Bay Dist ft
Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
SimTraffic Report
Page 3
323
Queuing and Blocking Report
2011 Existing PM 4 6 2011
Intersection 3 Park Road West Drivewa
Movement TYB NB 6
Directions Served LTR LTR LR
Maximum Queue ft 29 39 30
Average Queue ft 2 19 2
95th Queue ft 14 43 15
Link Distance ft 292 412 357
Upstream Bilk Time
Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Queuing Penalty veh
Storage Bay Dist ft
Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Intersection 9 Park Road East Drivewa
Movement B NB
Directions Served LTR LR
Maximum Queue ft 49 45
Average Queue ft 5 19
95th Queue ft 26 45
Link Distance ft 99 387
Upstream Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Storage Bay Dist ft
Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty 1
t
SimTraffic Report I Page 4
324
t
SimTraffic Performance Report
2013 No Build PM 4 6 2011
1 Park Road Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Delay Veh s 11 0 10 0 5 2 9 7 11 5 5 2 7 3 1 0 5 5 5 5 3 2 3 6
Vehicles Entered 57 4 76 36 8 73 66 413 14 28 288 79
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 Park Road Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
EBR
Delay Veh s 3 7
NBT
Vehicles Entered 1142
Delay Veh s
Denied Entry Before 0
2 2
2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
5 2
M veiiie EBL EBT EBR WBt 1 IBT M BR NBL NBT NBR SB Si3R
Delay Veh s 64 5 22 4 4 6 75 9 37 8 4 1 74 2 68 4 3 3 73 6 69 5 3 0
Vehicles Entered 226 740 28 138 1298 273 79 295 171 112 221 239
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
0
Movement All
0
Delay Veh s 37 5
0 0
Vehicles Entered 3820
Denied Entry Before 0
I Park Road West Driveway Performance by movement
9 Park Road East Driveway Performance by movement
IVlvveierif EBT
EBT EBR WBL VUBT AIBI NBT NBR SBL All
Delay Veh s 0 3 0 0 2 2 0 4 5 2 6 7 2 7 4 9 0 9
Vehicles Entered 91 4 32 88 4 1 24 1 245
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Park Road East Driveway Performance by movement
IVlvveierif EBT NBR WBt INBT NBL NBR All
Delay Veh s 0 6 0 1 1 7 0 5 6 7 3 0 1 0
Vehicles Entered 114 2 37 117 4 22 296
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SimTraffic Report
Page 1
325
SimTraffic Performance Report
2013 No Build PM 4 6 201 1
Total Network Performance
Delay Veh s 46 6
Vehicles Entered 4050
Denied Entry Before 0
SimTraffic Report
Page 2
326
Queuing and Blocking Report
2013 No Build PM 4 6 2011
Intersection 1 Park Road Powers Boulevard
45 Mfl 4 L t e WF a wx A Y ra r dr
Directions Served LTR LTR L T L R
Maximum Queue ft 101 94 48 4 50 12
Average Queue ft 38 34 11 0 7 1
95th Queue ft 71 64 37 4 29 5
Link Distance ft 99 166 1152
314
Upstream Blk Time 0
672 686
Queuing Penalty veh 0
156 225 235
Storage Bay Dist ft
193 145
350 225 225
Storage Blk Time
393 14 1 1
Queuing Penalty veh
132 139
95th Queue ft 307
Intersection 2 Arboretum
268
Boulevard Powers Boulevard
M
E B wB wBiB B4 B4
L L
E3
Directions Served L T T L T T R T T L T T
Maximum Queue ft 345 314 330 347 672 686 209 16 34 156 225 235
Average Queue ft 193 145 171 132 368 393 14 1 1 77 132 139
95th Queue ft 307 242 268 264 598 624 184 11 25 143 207 207
Link Distance ft 2014 2014 871 871 2220 2220 674 674
Upstream Blk Time 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty veh 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist ft 550 630 600 230
Storage Blk Time 1 1 0
Queuing Penalty veh 1 3 0
Intersection 2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard
M v6 SB 513 SB
Directions Served L L T T
Maximum Queue ft 123 142 186 199
Average Queue ft 52 65 95 111
95th Queue ft 108 118 160 174
Link Distance ft 473 473
Upstream Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Storage Bay Dist ft 250 250
Storage Blk Time 0 0
Queuing Penalty veh 0 0
SimTraffic Report
Page 3
327
Queuing and Blocking Report 1
2013 No Build PM 4 6 2011
Intersection I Park Road West Drivewa
Directions Served LTR LTR LR
Maximum Queue ft 30 35 12
Average Queue ft 3 19 1
95th Queue ft 17 43 9
Link Distance ft 292 412 357
Upstream Blk Time m
Queuing Penalty veh
Storage Bay Dist ft
Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Intersection 9 Park Road East Drivew
Movement I I WB NB
Directions Served LTR LR
Maximum Queue ft 62 36
Average Queue ft 7 17
95th Queue ft 34 42
Link Distance ft 99 387
Upstream Bilk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Storage Bay Dist ft u
Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh s
Network Summa
Network wide Queuing Penalty 4
1
n
SimTraffic Report
Page 4
328
SimTraffic Performance Report
2013 Build PM 4 6 2011
1 Park Road Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
9iYiG if31 I 3 EO i E131 1 YVB
Delay Veh s 13 4
Vehicles Entered
Delay Veh s 55 3 16 5 4 2 20 4 22 7 11 0 11 0 1 5 5 3 7 0 3 6 5 3
Vehicles Entered 276 5 125 31 7 77 121 406 17 34 285 282
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 Park Road Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Delay Veh s 13 4
Vehicles Entered 1666
Denied Entry Before 0
2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement EBt EBT EBR VYBt titST VtIBR I BL 1VBT NW SBL SST SBR
Delay Veh s 65 6 25 5 5 0 174 4 37 1 4 0 260 1 73 6 3 8 74 7 74 9 3 2
Vehicles Entered 214 715 100 227 1275 287 149 343 263 108 265 222
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Delay Veh s 51 4
Vehicles Entered 4168
Denied Entry Before 0
Performance by movement
1 9 2 1 0 2 0 5 6 1
6 65 85 88 12
0 0 0 0 0
8 9 6 4 18 9 3 4 8 6
1 22 267 10 674
0 0 0 0 0
9 Park Road East Driveway Performance by movement
Moverl nt EBT rBR UUBT VtSR SBR All
Delay Veh s 23 5 1 3 0 6 0 8 493 5 4 7 24 6
Vehicles Entered 389 1 234 175 24 2 825
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SimTraffic Report
Page 1
329
SimTraffic Performance Report
2013 Build PM 4 6 2011
Total Network Performance
Delay Veh s 67 7
Vehicles Entered 4538
Denied Entry Before 0
SimTraffic Report
Page 2
330
I
I
Queuing and Blocking Report
2013 Build PM 4 6
Intersection 1 Park Road Powers Boulevard
Directions Served L TR LTR L T T R
Maximum Queue ft 189 94 103 92 6 25 4
Average Queue ft 144 33 44 30 0 1 0
95th Queue ft 218 62 88 64 4 7 3
Link Distance ft 104 104 166
260
1147 1147
226
Upstream Blk Time 55 0 0
533 541 20 152
Queuing Penalty veh 112 0 0
Link Distance ft
0
2014
Storage Bay Dist ft
871 871 1035
350 350
Storage Blk Time
Upstream Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
0 1 0
Queuing Penalty veh
Intersection 2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard
L T R
56 4 46
12 0 3
41 3 24
T
669
345
225 225
wB B B1 R AN 41
Directions Served L T T L T T R T T L T T
Maximum Queue ft 345 266 296 593 596 601 27 208 207 336 507 452
Average Queue ft 187 155 179 367 360 377 1 7 7 260 272 226
95th Queue ft 318 248 275 598 533 541 20 152 151 396 563 456
Link Distance ft
0
2014 2014 871 871 1035 1035 669 669
Upstream Blk Time 0 0 1 0
Queuing Penalty veh 0 0 2 0
Storage Bay Dist ft 550 630 600 230
Storage Blk Time 1 0 0 40 1 0
Queuing Penalty veh 8 0 0 66 2 0
Intersection 2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard
M Yir3I 54 3
Directions Served L L T T
Maximum Queue ft 114 123 187 262
Average Queue ft 50 61 98 151
95th Queue ft 93 103 164 229
Link Distance ft 473 473
Upstream Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Storage Bay Dist ft 250 250
Storage Blk Time 0 0
Queuing Penalty veh 0 1
I SimTraffic Report
Page 3
331
Queuing and Blocking Report
2013 Build PM 4 6 2011
Intersection 3 Park Road West Drivewa
Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Intersection 9 Park Road East Driveway
ovement EB EB WB WB NB
Directions Served T TR T TR R R
Directions Served LTR L R LTR LT R T T
2
Maximum Queue ft 73 30 8 55 219 88 26 26s
Average Queue ft 8 7 0 21 82 10 3 2
95th Queue ft 42 27 4 48 202 75 34 27
Queuing Penalty
Link Distance ft 883 291 406 339 339 116 116
Upstream Blk Time 3 0 1 0 P
Queuing Penalty veh 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist ft 100
Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Intersection 9 Park Road East Driveway
ovement EB EB WB WB NB
Directions Served T TR T TR R R
Maximum Queue ft 140 227 27 56 232 30
Average Queue ft 65 71 1 4 82 2
95th Queue ft 176 271 14 32 247 14
Link Distance ft 291 104 104 376 339
Upstream Blk Time 5 0 2
Queuing Penalty veh 19 1 0
Storage Bay Dist ft 75 Y
e WNW o xC 0 201 I r O
Storage Blk Time 29
Queuing Penalty 55 veh
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty 267
e
SimTraffc Report
Page 4
332
SimTraffic Performance Report
2013 Build Improvements A B PM 5 6 2011
1 Park Road Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
SimTraffic Report
Page 1
fovea ent NBT NBR t 4 SBT i S 3R
Delay Veh s 27 3 27 3 3 7 40 2 37 4 12 2 27 0 9 6 6 0 13 3 6 8 6 0
Vehicles Entered 279 5 129 30 7 77 121 406 17 34 280 277
r 1 Park Road Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement
Delay Veh s 13 2
Vehicles Entered 1662
2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
Delay Veh s 70 8 30 6 5 1 71 3 41 4 4 1 68 7 62 1 4 4
Vehicles Entered 215 713 99 224 1265 287 150 344 265
71 0 87 1 3 3
107 269 223
2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Delay Veh s 41 2
Vehicles Entered 4161
3 Park Road West Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBR All
Delay Veh s 2 9 0 6 0 2 2 1 0 2 0 6 5 9 7 4 3 9 8 5 2 5 4 1
Vehicles Entered 13 105 5 63 85 91 11 1 22
9 Park Road East Driveway Performance by movement
266 10 672
Movement EBT Ebg WBT WBR NBR SBR All
Delay Veh s 2 3 0 5 0 6 0 6 8 6 2 3 1 7
Vehicles Entered 391 1 235 175 23 3 828
Total Network Performance
Delay Veh s 53 7
Vehicles Entered 4522
SimTraffic Report
Page 1
333
Queuing and Blocking Report
2013 Build Improvements A B PM
i S B
Directions Served L
5 6 2011
L T
Intersection 1 Park Road Powers Boulevard
L T T L L T
Maximum Queue ft 376 304 318 387 689 700 263 257 268 106 123 197
Directions Served L TR LTR L T T R L T T R
63
Maximum Queue ft 185 105 136 134 98 136 28 66 90 95 75
97
Average Queue ft 129 32 53 57 43 62 4 17 16 26 35
669
95th Queue ft 195 68 103 114 85 115 21 48 55 68 69
Link Distance ft 104 104 166 1147 1147
Queuing Penalty veh
669 669
Upstream Blk Time 18 0 0
Storage Bay Dist ft 550 630
Queuing Penalty veh 38 1 0
230 250 250
Storage Blk Time
Storage Bay Dist ft 350
2 1
350 225 225
Storage Blk Time
1 2 3 1 0
Intersection 2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard
Queuing Penalty veh
r fo3rmen SB aY F
Intersection 2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard
T
SimTraffic Report
Page 2
i S B
Directions Served L T T L T T L T T L L T
Maximum Queue ft 376 304 318 387 689 700 263 257 268 106 123 197
Average Queue ft 185 173 192 208 404 423 140 149 155 50 63 104
95th Queue ft 313 270 292 340 590 602 232 232 239 97 106 176
Link Distance ft 2014 2014 871 871 669 669 473
Upstream Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Storage Bay Dist ft 550 630 230 250 250
Storage Blk Time 0 1 2 1 0
Queuing Penalty veh 1 2 3 1 0
Intersection 2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard
r fo3rmen SB aY F
Directions Served T
Maximum Queue ft 288
Average Queue ft 166
95th Queue ft 248
Link Distance ft 473
Upstream Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Storage Bay Dist ft
Storage Blk Time 2
Queuing Penalty veh 5
SimTraffic Report
Page 2
334
Queuing and Blocking Report
2013 Build Improvements A B PM 51612011
Intersection 3 Park Road West Driveway
q a fr us t r x F s 1 x czfi YC 3 a x s x
Directions Served LTR L R LTR LT R
Maximum Queue ft 26 37 7 51 118 22
Average Queue ft 2 5 0 21 58 6
95th Queue ft 14 25 4 47 97 22
Link Distance ft 883 291 406 339 339
Upstream Blk Time
104 104 376 339
Upstream Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Storage Bay Dist ft 100
Storage Blk Time
Storage Bay Dist ft 75
Queuing Penalty veh
Storage Blk Time 1
Intersection 9 Park Road East Driveway
Directions Served T TR T TR R R
Maximum Queue ft 103 42 14 39 52 30
Average Queue ft 12 2 1 2 18 2
95th Queue ft 55 28 11 18 45 15
Link Distance ft 291 104 104 376 339
Upstream Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Storage Bay Dist ft 75
Storage Blk Time 1
Queuing Penalty veh 1
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty 51
I SimTraffic Report
Page 3
335
SimTraffic Performance Report L
2030 No Build Improvement A PM 5 4 2011
1 Park Road Powers Boulevard Performance by movement I
0 w n S
Delay Veh s 42 6 36 8 30 6 47 7 60 5 40 5 8 6 1 9 5 2 8 4 3 3 3 7
Vehicles Entered 113 5 105 64 6 151 87 767 30 86 415 122
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 Park Road Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
Delay Veh s 11 6
Vehicles Entered 1951
Denied Entry Before 0
2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
PS
Delay I Veh s 47 4
Vehicles Entered 4742
Denied Entry Before 0
3 Park Road West Driveway Performance by movement
Bl tB Bt All
Delay Veh s 2 6 0 0 2 6 0 5 6 4 3 5 7 2 6 2
Delay Veh s 95 6 35 9 4 9 65 9 44 1 4 4 115 7 71 0 4 6 76 3 95 5 3 4
Vehicles Entered 261 803 51 267 1390 292 164 437 427 120 294 236
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
PS
Delay I Veh s 47 4
Vehicles Entered 4742
Denied Entry Before 0
3 Park Road West Driveway Performance by movement
9 Park Road East Driveway Performance by movement
Itsle 6ment
Bl tB Bt All
Delay Veh s 2 6 0 0 2 6 0 5 6 4 3 5 7 2 6 2 2 2
Vehicles Entered 171 4 36 147 7 1 25 2 393
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Park Road East Driveway Performance by movement
Itsle 6ment EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR All
Delay Veh s 25 5 16 2 1 9 0 5 115 4 102 0 18 6
Vehicles Entered 198 1 34 178 4 25 440
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SirnTraffic Report
Page 1
336
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 No Build Improvement A PM 5 4 2011
Total Network Performance
Delay Veh s 61 7
Vehicles Entered 5065
Denied Entry Before 0
SirnTraffic Report
Page 2
337
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 No Build Improvement A PM 5 4 2011
Intersection 1 Park Road Powers Boul
3 3a p 7 n Y g R E py y 5 r Yy p Y 0 a s 7 3 ry
Directions Served LTR LTR T L T R L R
Maximum Queue ft 119 237 54 57 20 14 69 22
Average Queue ft 90 116 3 18 1 0 28 3
95th Queue ft 135 218 23 43 7 8 62 14
Link Distance ft 99 166 223 1152
726 728 209
Upstream Blk Time 27 10
408 402
Average Queue ft 279 215
Queuing Penalty veh 63 0
467 21 4 5 187
Storage Bay Dist ft
226
95th Queue ft 469
350 350 225 225
Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Intersection 2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard
Intersection 2 Arboretum Boulevard Pow Boulevard
r
Billetlt
Directions Served L
z wB B WBFi VB 4
Maximum Queue ft 130 135 282 301
Average Queue ft 61 69 152
95th Queue ft 111 119 247
Directions Served L T T L T T R T T L T T
Maximum Queue ft 498 369 409 412 726 728 209 81 94 320 408 402
Average Queue ft 279 215 239 238 442 467 21 4 5 187 234 226
95th Queue ft 469 335 358 370 673 697 228 61 72 332 394 350
Link Distance ft 2014 2014 871 871 2220 2220 674 674
Upstream Blk Time 0 0 0
Queuing Penalty veh 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist ft 550 630 600 230
Storage Blk Time 0 2 2 14 4 1
Queuing Penalty veh 1 4 7 30 7 3
Intersection 2 Arboretum Boulevard Pow Boulevard
r
Billetlt
Directions Served L L T T
Maximum Queue ft 130 135 282 301
Average Queue ft 61 69 152 170
95th Queue ft 111 119 247 265
Link Distance ft 473 473
Upstream Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Storage Bay Dist ft 250 250
Storage Blk Time 2 3
Queuing Penalty veh 2 8
I
1
1
SimTraffic Report
Page 3
338
1
t
1
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 No Build Improvement A PM 5 4 2011
Intersection 3 Park Road West Driveway
4 C d e L3l lir st r
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LR
Maximum Queue ft 60 47 49 31
Average Queue ft 7 7 21 2
95th Queue ft 54 31 46 14
Link Distance ft 894 292 412 357
Upstream Blk Time
387
Upstream Blk Time 4
Queuing Penalty veh
Storage Bay Dist ft
Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Intersection 9 Park Road East Dri
Mc rnett rX
Directions Served LTR LTR LR
Maximum Queue ft 217 63 136
Average Queue ft 63 7 39
95th Queue ft 212 37 117
Link Distance ft 292 99 387
Upstream Blk Time 4 0
Queuing Penalty veh 8 0
Storage Bay Dist ft
Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Network Summa
Network wide Queuing Penalty 133
SimTraffic Report
Page 4
I 339
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 Build Mitigation A PM
EBT BR tBt u M
5 5 2011
1 Park Road Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
Denied Entry Before
N
40 5 0 6
Delay Veh s 191 3 26 5 9 4 155 1 173 1 129 6 12 7 2 4 5 5 10 1 3 4 5 2
Vehicles Entered 144 4 74 56 8 136 137 764 33 84 403 318
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 Park Road Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
e 1
r
EBT BR tBt u M NBT I BR 56t F3 SCR
Denied Entry Before
Delay Veh s 29 3
40 5 0 6 1 1 5729 1 9 2
Vehicles Entered 2161
Delay 1 Veh s 105 0 47 1 5 5 75 6
Denied Entry Before 0
86 0 59 0 4 5 76 6 91 4 3 5
2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
e 1 X 1 2 EBT BR tBt u M NBT I BR 56t F3 SCR
Denied Entry Before 0
40 5 0 6 1 1 5729 1 9 2 125 7
Delay 1 Veh s 105 0 47 1 5 5 75 6 56 3 5 0 86 0 59 0 4 5 76 6 91 4 3 5
Vehicles Entered 246 782 108 378 1395 304 192 405 444 121 307 235
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
Movement All
Delay Veh s 51 4
Vehicles Entered 4917
Denied Entry Before 0
3 Park Road West Driveway Performance by movement
9 Park Road East Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBR All
Delay Veh s 186 2 40 5 0 6 1 1 5729 1 9 2 125 7
Vehicles Entered 222
Delay Veh s 283 7 253 9 298 9 2 2 0 2 0 5 677 3 965 0 1468 9 2 0 251 2
Vehicles Entered 11 167 3 73 136 88 13 1 24 47 1 564
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Park Road East Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBR All
Delay Veh s 186 2 40 5 0 6 1 1 5729 1 9 2 125 7
Vehicles Entered 222 1 295 166 17 3 704
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1
SimTraffic Report
Page 1
J 340
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 Build Mitigation A PM 5 5 2011
Total Network Performance
Delay Veh s 199 1
Vehicles Entered 5317
Denied Entry Before 4
SirnTraffic Report
Page 2
341
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build Mitigation A PM 5 5 2011
Intersection 1 Park Road Powers Boulevard
Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Intersection 2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard
EB t
Directions Served L TR LTR T L T R L T R
Maximum Queue ft 206 115 253 225 107 8 13 91 4 57
Average Queue ft 178 38 207 119 36 0 1 35 0 5
95th Queue ft 190 89 304 295 81 4 7 71 3 30
Link Distance ft 104 104 166 223
832
1147
430 174
669
323
Upstream Blk Time 99 1 69 30
2014
15
871 871 2220
Queuing Penalty veh 244 1 0 0
1 2
Storage Bay Dist ft 350
Queuing Penalty veh
350 225 225
Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Intersection 2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard
EB t
Directions Served L
Directions Served L T T L T T R T T L T T
Maximum Queue ft 486 405 419 779 864 874 690 312 342 330 347 363
Average Queue ft 280 255 277 374 530 550 64 20 27 195 180 185
95th Queue ft 488 370 390 635 832 852 430 174 226 323 316 310
Link Distance ft 2014 2014
15
871 871 2220 2220 669 669
Upstream Blk Time 1 2 0
Queuing Penalty veh 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist ft 550 630 600 230
Storage Blk Time 1 0 1 5 7 10 2 1
Queuing Penalty veh 4 0 7 19 21 23 4 3
Intersection 2 Arboretum Bouleva Powers Boulevard
Cl
1
1
C
t
SimTraffic Report
Page 3
Directions Served L L T T R
Maximum Queue ft 124 138 260 308 219
Average Queue ft 57 67 141 188 16
95th Queue ft 107 117 234 299 137
Link Distance ft 473 473
Upstream Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Storage Bay Dist ft 250 250 250
Storage Blk Time 1 6
Queuing Penalty veh 2 15
Cl
1
1
C
t
SimTraffic Report
Page 3
342
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty 914
1
SimTraffic Report
Page 4
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build Mitigation A PM 5 5 2011
Intersection 3 Park Road West Driveway
Directions Served LTR T L R LTR T LT R T T
Maximum Queue ft 592 54 35 9 359 58 420 82 136 131
Average Queue ft 355
95th Queue ft 862
26
149
5
22
0
6
190
424
17
119
389
500
19
149
117
168
91
181
Link Distance ft 883 257 291 406 277 339 339 116 116
Upstream Blk Time 10 12 6 10 4 94 0 93 63
Queuing Penalty veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist ft 100
Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Intersection 4 Bend
Nloveraent
Directions Served T
Maximum Queue ft 370
Average Queue ft 13
95th Queue ft 194
Link Distance ft 871
Upstream Blk Time 0
Queuing Penalty veh 0
Storage Bay Dist ft
1 Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Intersection 9 Park Road East Driveway
ES EB IVB BNB N87 61 6
Directions Served T TR T TR R T R
Maximum Queue ft 150
Average Queue ft 149
307
290
12
0
75
4
447
293
180
34
30
2
95th Queue ft 154 363 6 30 526 138 15
Link Distance ft
Upstream Blk Time
291
74
104 104
0
376
45
257
0
339
Queuing Penalty veh 344 1 0 0
Storage Bay Dist ft 75
Storage Blk Time 97
Queuing Penalty veh 226
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty 914
1
SimTraffic Report
Page 4
343
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 Build Mitigation A B PM
r 3 L SB All
Delay I Veh s 2 7
SBA BIR
5 5 2011
104 0 48 0
1 Park Road Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
52 6 4 9 122 1 64 5 6 6
r
112 9 5 0
t S T S a
243 787
Delay Veh s 30 6 19 2 4 2 45 0 50 8 26 4 35 2 15 7 6 5 29 0 7 3 6 5
Vehicles Entered 310 5 168 63 8 146 136 769 32 85 399 314
0 0
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 Park Road Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
Delay Veh s 17 2
Vehicles Entered 2435
Denied Entry Before 0
2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
Delay I Veh s 53 3
Vehicles Entered 5101
Denied Entry Before 0
3 Park Road West Driveway Performance by movement
N NIBT r 3 L SB All
Delay I Veh s 2 7
SBA BIR
Delay Veh s 104 0 48 0 5 5 72 0 52 6 4 9 122 1 64 5 6 6 78 5 112 9 5 0
Vehicles Entered 243 787 108 372 1385 311 224 476 526 119 312 238
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
Delay I Veh s 53 3
Vehicles Entered 5101
Denied Entry Before 0
3 Park Road West Driveway Performance by movement
9 Park Road East Driveway Performance by movement
MMment
N NIBT r 3 L SB All
Delay I Veh s 2 7 0 7 1 4 2 5 0 3 0 5 7 2 6 5 5 0 12 8 3 0 5 1
Vehicles Entered 11 169 3 73 138 88 12 1 26 267 10 798
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Park Road East Driveway Performance by movement
MMment B EBR UVBT WBR NBR 4 3 dA IMIM
Delay Veh s 2 6 0 9 0 7 0 6 18 1 5 0 2 1
Vehicles Entered 459 2 297 165 24 2 949
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
L
Ci
SirnTraffic Report
Page 1
344
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 Build Mitigation A B PM 5 5 2011
Total Network Performance
t
J
11
SirnTraffic Report
Page 2
3 aw e
24 ae n Z 4 aka L 9 a mss c bs a i
Delay Veh s 69 3
Vehicles Entered 5551
Denied Entry Before 0
t
J
11
SirnTraffic Report
Page 2
345
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build Mitigation A B PM 5 5 2011
Intersection 1 Park Road Powers Boulevard
Directions Served L TR LTR T L T T R L T T R
Maximum Queue ft 182 92 225 25 158 190 273 45 134 314 78 107
Average Queue ft 143 38 109 1 72 90 140 11 52 25 30 52
95th Queue ft 199 71 196 13 142 162 223 35 101 164 66 93
Link Distance ft 104 104 166 223 1147 1147
0 0
669 669
Upstream Blk Time 26 0 3
250 250
0
Storage Blk Time
Penalty
Queuing Penalty veh 65 0 0
Queuing veh
0
Storage Bay Dist ft 350 350 225 225
Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Intersection 2 Arboretum Bou Powers B 1 o y ulev yy a ar rd
Directions Served L T T L T T R T T L T T
Maximum Queue ft 500 398 420 758 873 882 423 84 132 350 522 492
Average Queue ft 267 255 277 368 518 545 22 3 7 265 268 250
95th Queue ft 463 360 382 605 795 832 229 37 62 395 479 435
Link Distance ft 2014 2014 871 871 2220 2220 669 669
Upstream Blk Time 0 1 0
Queuing Penalty veh 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist ft 550 630 600 230
Storage Blk Time 0 4 6 30 4 1
Queuing Penalty veh 2 15 18 72 10 6
Intersection 2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard
fi 38 SB SB SB B6 66 1
Directions Served R L L T T R T T
Maximum Queue ft
Average Queue ft
82
3
123
57
148
66
355
170
382
222
148
24
39
1
64
3
95th Queue ft 60 107 119 31 1 369 172 16 40
Link Distance ft 473 473 1834 1834
Upstream Blk Time 1 1
Queuing Penalty veh 0 0
Storage Bay Dist ft 300 250 250 250
Storage Blk Time
Penalty
3
3
13
32 Queuing veh
I
I
I i
SimTraffic Report
Page 3
A 346
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build Mitigation A B PM 5 5 2011
1 Intersection 3 Park Road West Driveway
Directions Served LTR L R LTR LT R
Maximum Queue ft 32 34 9 54 195 22
Average Queue ft 2
95th Queue ft 16
13
38
0 24
6 50
75
146
6
21
Link Distance ft 883 291 406 339 339
Upstream Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Storage Bay Dist ft 100
Storage Blk Time
1 Queuing Penalty veh
Intersection 4 Bend
Movement EB
Directions Served T
Maximum Queue ft 372
Average Queue ft 13
95th Queue ft 195
Link Distance ft 871
Upstream Blk Time 0
Queuing Penalty veh 0
Storage Bay Dist ft
Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Intersection 9 Park Road East Driveway
Movemenf d
Directions Served T T TR R R
Maximum Queue ft 110
Average Queue ft 17
10
1
22 63
1 20
30
2
95th Queue ft 71 9 9 51 16
Link Distance ft
Upstream Blk Time
104 104 376 339
Queuing Penalty veh
Storage Bay Dist ft 75
Storage Blk Time 1
Queuing Penalty veh 3
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty 225
I SimTraffic Report
Page 4
1 347
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 Build Mitigation A D PM
w EBB
u
it R
Delay Veh s 79 5 39 8
5 5 2011
43 8
1 Park Road Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
76 7 57 2 6 4 76 2
Vehicles Entered 244
1NBL WBT WBR NBT NBR SBL SB T SBR
120
Delay Veh s 31 1 18 7 4 1 43 6 49 5 25 1 34 8 16 0 6 6 27 6 7 6 7 3
Vehicles Entered 308 5 167 62 9 146 138 765 32 86 397 315
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 Park Road Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
Sj@ EO A NM 13 t F
E3 a YY
w EBB
u
it R
Delay Veh s 79 5 39 8 5 4 66 7 43 8 4 6 76 7 57 2 6 4 76 2 76 4 3 3
Vehicles Entered 244 787 106 373 1385 311 223 471 525 120 312 235
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard Performance by movement
a
Delay Veh s 43 0
Vehicles Entered 5092
Denied Entry Before 0
3 Park Road West Driveway Performance by movement
laysriiei t EL w EBB BR TiyBF IB r JBT rW Et SBA SB12 4 I
Delay Veh s 2 9 0 7 0 5 2 4 0 3 0 6 6 6 7 2 5 0 11 4 2 6 4 7
Vehicles Entered 11 167 3 74 137 88 12 1 26 266 10 795
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Park Road East Driveway Performance by movement
Movement EBT
Delay 1 Veh s 2 8
Vehicles Entered 456
Denied Entry Before 0
i
1 1 0 7 0 6 21 9 4 3
2 297 166 24 2
0 0 0 0 0
All
2 2
947
0
1
t
SimTraffic Report
Page 1
348
SimTraffic Performance Report
2030 Build Mitigation A D PM 5 5 2011
Total Network Performance
1
u
SirnTraffic Report
Page 2
Delay Veh s 59 6
Vehicles Entered 5542
Denied Entry Before 0
1
u
SirnTraffic Report
Page 2
349
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build Mitigation A D PM 5 5 2011
Intersection 1 Park Road Powers Boulevard
Directions Served L TR LTR T L T T R L T T
SB
R
Maximum Queue ft 187 86 223 17 157 212 274 44 124 78 112 109
Average Queue ft 147 37 106 0 71 94 144 11 53 17 32 47
95th Queue ft 198 69 193 6 133 174 233 35 104 56 77 93
Link Distance ft 104 104 166 223 1147 1147
29 1
669 669
95th Queue ft
Upstream Blk Time 27 0 3
338 709 744 269 16 19
Queuing Penalty veh 67 0 0
2014
250
870 870
Storage Bay Dist ft
2220
Storage Blk Time
Upstream Blk Time
350 350 225
0
225
Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Intersection 2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard
Intersection 2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard
Directions Served T T L L T T R
Maximum Queue ft 397
Directions Served L L T T L L T T R T T L
Maximum Queue ft 201 220 359 383 257 500 775 835 728 22 27 349
Average Queue ft 115 118 234 259 148 194 457 482 29 1 1 218
95th Queue ft 183 192 337 356 226 338 709 744 269 16 19 347
Link Distance ft 2014 2014
250
870 870 2220 2220
Storage Blk Time
Upstream Blk Time
0 0 3
0 0 0
2
Queuing Penalty veh
0 7
0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist ft 550 550 630 630 600 230
Storage Blk Time 2 3 10
Queuing Penalty veh 7 9 24
Intersection 2 Arboretum Boulevard Powers Boulevard
Directions Served T T L L T T R
Maximum Queue ft 397 374 126 139 241 307 143
Average Queue ft 202 202 59 70 128 175 5
95th Queue ft 333 317 113 119 207 270 75
Link Distance ft 669 669 473 473
Upstream Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Storage Bay Dist ft 250 250 250
Storage Blk Time 3 0 0 3
Queuing Penalty veh 7 2 0 7
t
SimTraffic Report
Page 3
350
1
Queuing and Blocking Report
2030 Build Mitigation A D PM 5 5 2011
Intersection 3 Park Road West Drivewa
Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Intersection 4 Bend
Storage Bay Dist ft
Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Intersection 9 Park Road East Driveway
Directions Served T TR T TR R
Directions Served LTR L R LTR LT R
Maximum Queue ft 27 34 4 61 166 22
Average Queue ft 2 10 0 24 70 6
95th Queue ft 13 34 3 51 130 21
Link Distance ft 883
1
291 406 339 339
Upstream Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Storage Bay Dist ft 100
Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Intersection 4 Bend
Storage Bay Dist ft
Storage Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Intersection 9 Park Road East Driveway
Directions Served T TR T TR R R
Maximum Queue ft 124 35 23 42 75 30
Average Queue ft 20 1 1 1 21 2
95th Queue ft 81 26 9 16 55 16
Link Distance ft 291 104 104 376 339
Upstream Blk Time
Queuing Penalty veh
Storage Bay Dist ft 75
Storage Blk Time 1
Queuing Penalty veh 3
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty 127
SimTraffic Report
Page 4
351
r FJ Kanley Hom and Associates Inc Walmart Store 5949 00
Technical Memorandum
To Paul Oehme City of Chanhassen
From Lucas C Payne PE MN Kimley Horn and Associates Inc
William D Matzek PE MN Kimley Horn and Associates Inc
2550 University Avenue W
Date November 21 2011 Suite 238N
St Paul MN
55114
Subj Walmart Store 5949 00
Preliminary Drainage Analysis
The existing Site is located at the southwest quadrant of Powers Boulevard and MN Highway 5 in
the City of Chanhassen Carver County Minnesota Walmart Stores Inc is proposing to build a
117 278 square foot retail store proposed paved parking lot stormwater management
infrastructure and utilities
Kimley Horn and Associates Inc KHA has analyzed the existing and proposed drainage
conditions of the Site The analysis of the existing and proposed drainage systems was completed
with the assistance of HydroCAD Version 8 00
Existing Drainage
The existing Site is approximately 14 11 acres and 5 31 acres are covered with impervious
surfaces The Site currently has a vacant building that is approximately 154 674 square feet The
existing Site utilizes overland flow into multiple pipe networks around the Site There are four
outfalls from the Site where untreated stormwater is discharged
Outfall 1 takes drainage from the existing parking lot and building and discharges directly into an
existing wetland west of the Site through two existing stormwater pipes Outfall2 drains into an
existing drainage swale at the northeast corner of the Site The water then flows over land into an
existing 18 RCP which eventually discharges into the aforementioned wetland Outfall3 takes
drainage from the east side of the Site and sheet flows into an existing 15 RCP at the southeast
corner of the Site The stormwater discharges into an existing stormwater system beneath Powers
Boulevard Outfall 4 takes runoff from the south edge of the property Stormwater sheetflows in
the Park Road Right of Way and eventually into an existing storm sewer system
Proposed Drainage
The proposed Site will consist of a 117 278 square foot building and a paved parking lot The
proposed Site will contain 8 73 acres of impervious surfaces The proposed drainage system will
consist of the construction of a new storm sewer system two underground stormwater
management systems and four rain gardens The proposed Site will discharge the majority of the
treated stormwater into the wetland west of the Site Outfall 3 will convey sheet flow from offsite
and the easterly edge of the Site into an existing 15 RCP at the southeast corner of the Site The
stormwater discharges into an existing stormwater system beneath Powers Boulevard Outfall 4
takes runoff from the south edge of the property Stormwater sheetflows in the Park Road Right
of Way and eventually into an existing storm sewer system The amount of dishcharge into the
352
Walmart 5949 00
Technical Memorandum
Park Road Right of Way decreases from the existing condition in the 2 10 and 100 year
storms
The Site will comply with all applicable Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District City of
Chanhassen and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency applicable standards
Rate Attenuation Summary
The proposed Site will increase impervious area by 3 42 acres The stormwater management
system will provide rate attenuation for the 2 10 and 100 year storms The following table
summarizes the existing and proposed discharge rates from the Site
EXISTING RUNOFF RATES
2 Year cfs 10 Year cfs 100 Year cfs
Outfall1 17 92 28 65 33 85
Outfall2 0 82 1 93 3 55
Outfall3 5 29 9 54 15 10
Outfall4 1 73 3 65 6 34
Total Site Discharge 25 76 43 77 58 84
PROPOSED RUNOFF RATES
Outfalll Outfall2 14 55 21 87 37 34
Outfall3 0 50 1 13 2 04
Outfall4 0 49 0 74 1 06
Total Site Discharge 15 54 23 74 40 44
Water Quality Summary
The Site will utilize two StormTech SC 740 systems and four rain gardens to meet and exceed
the water quality requirements The City of Chanhassen Surface Water Management Plan
requires that 1 inch of runoff from the new impervious shall be treated onsite Since the Site
discharges into an impaired water treatment will be provided for 1 inch of total impervious
throughout the Site The StormTech systems will provide pretreatment within prefabricated
Isolator Rows The StormTech Isolator Row is a row of StormTech chambers that are encased in
geotextile fabric and acts as a sediment trap prior to discharging into the entire system A strip of
non woven geotextile fabric is wrapped over the top of the chambers for the entire length of the
row separating the first flush from larger storms The Isolator Rows have been designed to
remove up to 95 total suspended solids TSS Additional treatment will occur as water filters
through the attenuation chambers and exits the underlying draintile The Isolator Rows can be
accessed via manholes at the ends of the rows and the sediment can be removed utilizing vacuum
trucks on an as needed basis
Four rain gardens will be placed in landscape areas throughout the Site Rain gardens will
provide first flush water quality treatment by biofiltration Filtration was used in lieu of
353
Walmart 5949 00
Technical Memorandum
infiltration due to the existing clay soils onsite Rain gardens will also provide TSS and
phosphorous removal throughout the Site
Below is a table summarizing the water quality treatment provided onsite
WATER QUALITY TREATMENT VOLUME
Water Quality Treatment Volume Required
Volume cf
Impervious Area ac Volume cf
1 inch over impervious area 1 8 73 31 690
Water Quality Treatment Volume Provided
Volume cf
StormTech System 1 22 433
StormTech System 2 9 670
Gardens 4 696 R o a t in al 36 799
Please contact me at 651 645 4185 if you have any questions
Sincerely
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC
M 4
Lucas C Payne P E
354
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss
COUNTY OF CARVER
I Karen J Engelhardt being first duly sworn on oath deposes that she is and was on
October 20 2011 the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen
Minnesota that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public
Hearing for Walmart Rezoning Planning Case 2011 11 to the persons named on attached
Exhibit A by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner and
depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage
fully prepaid thereon that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such
by the records of the County Treasurer Carver County Minnesota and by other appropriate
records
Kare J Engj a dt DepQ Clerk
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this day of C r 2011
Notary ublic
KIM T MEUWISSEN
Notary Public Minnesota
i MY C Jan 31 2015 ommission Expires
355
Notice of Public Hearing
Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting
Date Time Tuesday November 1 2011 at 7 00 p m This hearing may not
start until later in the evening depending on the order of the agenda
Location City Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd
Request for Rezoning from Industrial Office Park IOP to
Proposal Planned Unit Development PUD for a commercial
development of a 120 000 square foot Walmart Store on
approximately 14 10 acres of land
Applicant Walmart c o Kimle Horn Associates Inc
Property 1000 Park Road
Location A location map is on the reverse side of this notice
The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
applicant s request and to obtain input from the neighborhood
about this project During the meeting the Chair will lead the
What Happens public hearing through the following steps
at the Meeting 1 Staff will give an overview of the proposed project
2 The applicant will present plans on the project
3 Comments are received from the public
4 Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses
the project
If you want to see the plans before the meeting please visit
the City s projects web page at
www ci chanhassen mn us sery plan 11 11 html If you wish to
talk to someone about this project please contact Kate
Questions Aanenson by email at kaanenson o or
Comments by phone at 952 227 1139 If you choose to submit written
comments it is helpful to have one copy to the department in
advance of the meeting Staff will provide copies to the
Commission The staff report for this item will be available
online on the project web site listed above the Thursday
p rior to the Planning Commission meeting
City Review Procedure
Subdivisions Planned Unit Developments Site Plan Reviews Conditional and Interim Uses Wetland Alterations
Rezonings Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the
Planning Commission City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the
application in writing Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting
Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation
These reports are available by request At the Planning Commission meeting staff will give a verbal overview of
the report and a recommendation The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of
the hearing process The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a
recommendation to the City Council The City Council may reverse affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning
Commission s recommendation Rezonings land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the
City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial industrial
Minnesota State Statute 519 99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant
waives this standard Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete Any
person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting
A neighborhood spokesperson representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city Often developers
are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal Staff is also available to review the
project with any interested person s
Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing the City Council does not Minutes are taken and
any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council If you wish to have
something to be included in the report please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification
Notice of Public Hearing
Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting
Date Time Tuesday November 1 2011 at 7 00 P M This hearing may not
start until later in the evening depending on the order of the agenda
Location City Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd
Request for Rezoning from Industrial Office Park IOP to
Proposal Planned Unit Development PUD for a commercial
development of a 120 000 square foot Walmart Store on
approximately 14 10 acres of land
Applicant Walmart c o Kimle Horn Associates Inc
Property 1000 Park Road
Location A location map is on the reverse side of this notice
The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
applicant s request and to obtain input from the neighborhood
about this project During the meeting the Chair will lead the
What Happens public hearing through the following steps
at the Meeting 1 Staff will give an overview of the proposed project
2 The applicant will present plans on the project
3 Comments are received from the public
4 Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses
the project
If you want to see the plans before the meeting please visit
the City s projects web page at
www ci chanhassen mn us sery plan 11 11 html If you wish to
talk to someone about this project please contact Kate
Questions Aanenson by email at kanenson o ci chanhassen mn us or
Comments by phone at 952 227 1139 If you choose to submit written
comments it is helpful to have one copy to the department in
advance of the meeting Staff will provide copies to the
Commission The staff report for this item will be available
online on the project web site listed above the Thursday
prior to the Planning Commission meeting
City Review Procedure
Subdivisions Planned Unit Developments Site Plan Reviews Conditional and Interim Uses Wetland Alterations
Rezonings Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the
Planning Commission City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the
application in writing Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting
Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation
These reports are available by request At the Planning Commission meeting staff will give a verbal overview of
the report and a recommendation The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of
the hearing process The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a
recommendation to the City Council The City Council may reverse affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning
Commission s recommendation Rezonings land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the
City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial industrial
Minnesota State Statute 519 99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant
waives this standard Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete Any
person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its
status and scheduling for the City Council meeting
A neighborhood spokesperson representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city Often developers
are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal Staff is also available to review the
project with any interested person s
Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing the City Council does not Minutes are taken and
any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council If you wish to have
something to be included in the report please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification
356
CNL FUNDING 2000 A CORE MPLS INDUST PORTF ETAL DONALD E HALLA REVOCABLE
PO BOX 1671 1600 DAVE ST 450 TRUST
ORLANDO FL 32802 1671 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 2447 PO BOX 260888
PLANO TX 75026 0888
ECKANKAR
PO BOX 2000
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 2000
ISTAR MINNESOTA LLC
PO BOX 4900
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85261 4900
LOTUS HOLDINGS LLC
7411 FRONTIER TRL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9722
RIDGEVIEW MEDICAL CENTER
500 MAPLE ST S
WACONIA MN 55387 1791
WILLIAM MATZEK
KIMLEY HORN ASSOCIATES INC
2550 UNIVERSITY AVE W STE 238N
ST PAUL MN 55114
TFK MAMMOTH LLC
7801 PARK DR STE F
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9219
UNITED MAILING INC
7951 POWERS BLVD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9502
357
Carver County MN
fwd s t f J
a t
11 L
pod
l t
Property Information
Parcel ID 255660010
Taxpayer Name ISTAR MINNESOTA LLC
Taxpayer Address PO BOX 4900
Taxpayer City St Zip SCOTTSDALE AZ
85261 4900
Property Address 1000 PARK RD
Property City CHANHASSEN
AS400 Acres 14 68
Homestead N
School District 0112
Watershed District WS 064 RILEY PURG
BLUFF CREEK
Tax Exempt N
Platname PARK TWO 2ND ADDITION
GIS Acres 14 1
Disclaimer This map was created using Carver County s Geographic Map Scale N Information Systems GIS it is a compilation of information and data from 1 inch 641 feet various City County State and Federal offices This map is not a
surveyed or legally recorded map and is intended to be used as a W E
reference Carver County is not responsible for any inaccuracies Map Date contained herein
10 13 2011 S
358
46 0 IWCODIRECTO
DIRECT NARKETINO LIKE NO ONE ELSE
Joseph Morrison
President
Phone 952 470 6460
Fax 952 380 3969
November 21 2011
Mr Todd Gerhardt
Chanhassen City Manager
7700 Market Boulevard
P O Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Dear Mr Gerhardt
r Y r CHAN 1 SSE N
ANHA N IN i iv i r
7951 Powers Blvd
Chanhassen MN 55317
As we are all aware the Planning Commission recently voted to deny the Concept Planned Unit Development at
the intersection of Highway 5 and Powers Boulevard As the long term lessee of the property owned by Istar we
wish to provide the City Council an important perspective before its vote on November 28th
For the past 35 years IWCO Direct has called Chanhassen home During this time we ve expanded our operations
and added jobs along the way Today we are the third largest employer in Chanhassen providing 880 jobs in
Chanhassen and more than 1 400 jobs in Minnesota We are proud of our history of working with city leadership to
address key issues such as transportation education and health care In short we fully embrace the city of
Chanhassen and understand that a thriving community is good for residents businesses and local government
That s why we encourage the City Council to carefully consider the potential benefits of the proposed Walmart site
During the past six years we ve been unsuccessful in finding a buyer for this land parcel until now
Developing this parcel as a vibrant retail destination appears to be its best purpose It will create an anchor point for
Chanhassen s commerce corridor bringing customers not only to Walmart but to the surrounding retail stores and
restaurants If the City Council votes against the development it likely will take years to find another buyer delaying
the opportunity for an enhanced tax base Until then it will remain an under utilized asset to Chanhassen from a
jobs and tax perspective
Walmart anticipates the new development will provide between 250 300 needed jobs in Chanhassen The new
development will also add to the tax base As reported in the local papers in 2011 the Eden Prairie Walmart
generated 380 000 in property taxes To put that in context IWCO Direct paid 280 394 in property taxes in 2011
on the property in its current underutilized capacity In addition Walmart engaged Kimley Horn for a traffic study
IWCO Direct reviewed their findings and concluded the proposed plan will improve traffic flow in the area and make
it safer for our employees to cross between our buildings on Park Road and Powers Boulevard than the current
situation
Residents are currently leaving the city to shop at Walmart stores in nearby cities Welcoming Walmart to
Chanhassen will benefit our residents in many ways Dollars stay here to provide new jobs grow the tax base and
help make Chanhassen a more vibrant community
We encourage the City Council to vote in favor of the Walmart plan on November 28th
Sincerely
Joe Morrison
Corporate Headquarters 7951 Powers Boulevard Chanhassen MN 55317 9502
Facility Locations Downey CA Little Falls MN Hamburg PA Warminster PA
359
Aanenson Kate
From Scott Paulson gcfworld @gmail com
Sent Thursday October 06 2011 7 19 AM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Walmart
Good morning Kate
My name is Scott Paulson and I met with you a few years ago regarding the proposed Harley Davidson Dealership At
that time you indicated to me that you had Big Box retailers contacting you constantly about building in Chanhassen
You told me that there wasn t a single big box location in town left Is this still the case What is the cities stance on
Walmart I believe it would destroy the town and once they come in you can t get rid of them see Eden Prairie
Thank you
Scott Paulson
360
Aanenson Kate
From Matt Sarah Thomas Thomas8407 @q com
Sent Thursday October 06 2011 9 39 PM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Wal Mart
Hi Kate
Thank you for taking the time to speak with me this morning regarding the proposed Wal Mart development At the
time I was unable to access the documents via Laserfiche I have once again attempted to download the PDF from the
City website and while I couldn t print the PDF s I was able to view them I hope to stop by City Hall tomorrow to take a
closer look at the plan set and obtain some copies
A few quick things I realize this is simply a concept plan but they don t have much of a narrative to support their
request I d like to know why they propose the zoning change what benefit a rezoning and PUD would bring to the City
and why they can t meet the standards within the zoning code
I d like to see if they could meet the zoning standards and what a 65 000 SF Wal Mart would look like The rear of the
building outdoor storage and proof of parking along a busy corridor and entrance to downtown is not a good layout in
my opinion To garner support for this type of proposal the development should enhance not only the site but the
entire area and create a gateway to the downtown Because of the number of deviations from code that I can only
assume they ll need the development should provide a public benefit and also go above and beyond basic zoning
requirements The sign on a stick pylon design shows Wal Mart does not have the community in mind
As I stated this morning traffic greatly concerns me 212 just alleviated the traffic on Hwy 5 and this development
would put us right back where we started I don t know of any Chanhassen residents that have a desire for another big
box discount store in town especially with Target right across the street So we will have the traffic and road repairs
that are brought to us from residents living outside the City
Lastly Chanhassen contracts through the County for its police protection and I would like to know how the City would
plan to handle the increased service levels this development would likely require I have heard that crime tends to
follow Wal Mart That may or may not be true however I have had a Police Chief personally tell me not to shop at a
particular Wal Mart after certain hours because it is not safe My neighborhood has had many too many burglaries in
the past few years and besides the additional traffic crime is a fear of mine with this proposal I am curious if it would
be possible to check with other cities to see if they have seen an uptick in crime at their Wal Mart locations
Chanhassen just doesn t seem to be a good fit for Wal Mart especially at this location I would like to see the City work
on enhancing the downtown and drawing in businesses that will compliment what already exists and not allow a
monstrosity such as Wal Mart
1 look forward to seeing this proposal at the public hearing
Sincerely
Sarah Thomas
2555 Longacres Drive
361
Aanenson Kate
From beth miller1 @usbank com
Sent Friday October 07 2011 8 26 AM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Walmart
Please count us as against this development
We will be at all meetings we are able to attend
Beth Miller
Program Development Manager
Strategic Alliances Consumer Banking
Office 612 973 7834 Cell 952 232 7291 beth miller1 c usbank com
U S BANCORP made the following annotations
Electronic Privacy Notice This e mail and any attachments contains information that is or may be covered by electronic
communications privacy laws and is also confidential and proprietary in nature If you are not the intended recipient
please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining using copying distributing or otherwise disclosing this
information in any manner Instead please reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and
then immediately delete it Thank you in advance for your cooperation
362
Aanenson Kate
From Suzanne Huwald shuwald @mchsi com
Sent Friday October 07 2011 10 26 AM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject proposed Wal Mart
We have been resident s of Chanhassen for over 17 years and I would be extremely disappointed if Chanhassen brought
a Walmart to our town There is absolutely no need for a Walmart in Chanhassen We live off of Powers Blvd and we
have the Target in Chanhassen within 5 minutes of our house the Target in Chaska within 6 minutes of our house and
the Walmart and Target in Eden Prairie within 10 minutes of our house There is not a need for another big box discount
retailer in this area
We desperately need family friendly higher quality restraunts quality retail and a clean grocery store with low prices
and quality produce Hy Vee grocery stores are amazing and would be a great addition to Chanhassen
Thank you for your time
Suzanne Huwald
363
From Bonnie Filko bonnie filko@q com
Sent Friday October 07 2011 1 19 PM
To City Council
Subject Wal Mart
Good Afternoon
As a long time resident of Chanhassen I love how our community is growing and appreciate the
thoughtfulness the City Council has been in reviewing each new development request
In regard to Wal Mart We have a Wal Mart in Eden Prairie already which is only 5 miles or
so away As a citizen I am not opposed to a large establishment moving in especially as
this is close to the 212 highway and will therefore be attractive enough to draw consumers
and provide good tax revenue for Chanhassen Let s look for something that closely matches
our needs and will provide us something new in the area in regard to its goods and services
We have enough grocery stores enough banks and enough pharmacies within our city limits
The small strip malls in Chanhassen aren t very attractive and am sort of surprised they are
even still in business We have enough home improvement stores within a 6 mile radius
I am short on ideas on what would be a good alternative for this land development but hope
it is not Wal Mart that you determine what is good for our area
Thank you for your time and consideration
Bonnie Filko
1
364
Aanenson Kate
From Ann Kloempken annk2002 @juno com
Sent Monday October 10 2011 7 29 PM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Wal mart
Kate
I was so happy to hear that Walmart might be building in Chanhassen
It will bring jobs increased tax revenue and it could boost the sales of other retail
stores and restaurants in Chanhassen It will bring shoppers in from surrounding areas
Walmart is a great place to shop
I m concerned that you will only hear from people who are against the new store so I wanted
to be sure to let you know that I am looking forward to it
Ann
Penny Stock Jumping 3000
Sign up to the 1 voted penny stock newsletter for free today
http thirdpartyoffers iuno com TGL3141 4e938e2bc7a2032ad8m05vuc
1
365
From barbalan2 @aol com barbalan2 @aol com
Sent Tuesday October 11 2011 10 48 AM
To Furlong Tom
Subject Proposed Wal Mart Store in Chanhassen
Good morning Tom
We have heard that Wal Mart is interested in locating a store at the southwest corner of Highway 5 and Powers Blvd
Will you please let us know what your position is on this issue
Will you also please let us know what the proposed investment from the City of Chanhassen is for this project
infrastructure TIF etc
Thank you
Alan and Barb Johnson
366
Aanenson Kate
From dgjinc @aol com
Sent Tuesday October 11 2011 2 58 PM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject WAL MART
Good Afternoon I live in the Lake Susan Hills neighborhood and have been a resident of Chanhassen since 1991 This
is the first time I have felt the need to address the city and let my feeling known about any city projects I have just heard
about the proposed Wal Mart on Powers and Hwy 5 I AM 100 OPPOSED TO THIS PROJECT I believe it is wrong
for our community and personally oppose the general Wal mart business policy the way they treat their employees how
Ilocal small business dries up under the shadow of a Wal mart and how the dynamics of a city change when a huge box
store like Wal mart dominates and dictates the local business climate I will attend the Nov 1st planning meeting and alert
my neighbors I hope reason will prevail and this project will be killed Doug Jacobson 952 937 5381
367
Aanenson Kate
From Brown Kevin kevin brown @bemis com
Sent Wednesday October 12 2011 9 54 AM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Wal Mart Proposal
Good morning Kate
I have just caught wind of the Wal Mart proposal that will be under discussion on November 1 Unfortunately I will be
traveling for business on November 1 so my voice will not be heard at the meeting As such I am writing to you to
represent my voice As a note I live in the Springfield neighborhood at Lyman and 101 559 Greenview Drive
I like many other I am sure am not in favor of Wal Mart being located in Chanhassen As a citizen I do not like the
impact Wal Mart has on the local business community Local business is part of the charm of small American
communities as they help create and maintain the character of the community Wal Mart s destruction of local
businesses is easy to identify and prove
Additionally Wal Mart s EDLP everyday low prices sounds great but it is part of the reason as James McMurtry sings
we don t make it here anymore To me Wal Mart is simply the distribution network for foreign businesses Our dollars
spent at Wal Mart reinforce the practice of sourcing outside of our country That I cannot support
I cannot be honest if I don t admit that there are benefits to additional business in Chanhassen I would hope if this goes
through that Wal Mart s impact would be to increase the flow of money into the Chanhassen tax base Subsequently
this should allow taxes to be flat moving forward If Chanhassen is providing too much tax incentive to bring Wal Mart
to the community then the benefit to the community is being prostituted
Thanks for listening
Kevin Brown
Director of Sales
Bemis NMprint Division
kevin brownna bemis com
952 403 1572 office
773 610 7165 cell
This email and any attachments may contain confidential and or proprietary information If you are not the intended
recipient you are not authorized to read copy or use the contents of the email or any attachment If you have received
this email in error please let us know by reply and then delete it from your systern
368
Aanenson Kate
From Randi Shapiro rshapiro @jonathanmontessori com
Sent Wednesday October 12 2011 2 10 PM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Proposed Walmart
Hello Kate
I am a resident of Chanhassen and was shocked to hear about the proposed development on the SW corner of
Hwy 5 and Powers Blvd First that area is pretty busy now and I can hardly imagine it with a Walmart There
is a Walmart 10 minutes down the road for those who really plan to shop there I for one do not support their
business ethic or lack there of I should say Just because there is free enterprise I would hope that the planners
of Chanhassen could think of a more useful business that would help the Chanhassen small town feel continue
and still bring in the tax base they are hoping for Target is a more discreet business and certainly more ethical
than Walmart
Perhaps a restaurant or or a store like Michaels or a bowling alley for teens to have a good place to go would be
a better addition to Chanhassen I would be sick to have to drive by that business Walmart on a daily basis
A big mistake that will change the way Chanhassen is viewed I doubt that the best small towns in the country
have a Walmart in them Please think VERY carefully
Sincerely
Randi Shapiro
743 Preakness Lane
369
Aanenson Kate
From royetta snow @mchsi com
Sent Wednesday October 12 2011 5 59 PM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Walmart
I am very much against having a Walmart built in our town They are unfair to their employes
in the way they are treated and paid and I believe it will greatly affect the other
businesses as well I do not think they will add to the great town we have now Royetta
Snow
1
370
Aanenson Kate
From THOMAS W KRAUS kraushaus1 @msn com
Sent Thursday October 13 2011 9 09 AM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject proposed Wal Mart
We have learned that the city council is considering a rezoning proposal for the corner of Highway 5 and Powers Blvd to
allow Wal Mart to build a store there We feel this is a bad use of the property There is already a business there that
employs many people at higher wages that Wal Mart does Plus the access and egress problems would be great as that
is one of the busiest interesections in town We feel a better place for them to locate would be along 212 somewhere
We feel a Wal Mart store in town would completely distract from the small town feeling of Chanhassen which is one of
the main reason we moved here
Please deny this request
Tom Sharon Kraus
7744 Vasserman Trail
371
Aanenson Kate
From Linda Hauser lindamhauser @gmail com
Sent Thursday October 13 2011 10 33 AM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Wal Mart
Please please Say no to a Wal Mart in Chanhassen
Linda Hauser
2089 Clover Ct
Chanhassen
372
Aanenson Kate
From Tom Lindemeier tindemeier @mchsi com
Sent Thursday October 13 2011 9 14 PM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Walmart
Hi Kate My wife and I have been living in Chanhassen for 18 years now and have seen our community go through many
changes most of them have been very positive
This Wal mart development is a disaster waiting to happen I have been in architecture for 26 years and when you review
the traffic plans and overall scale of the project for that site it should not stand a chance to pass lf it has to be rezoned it
does not belong on that site to begin with
I know the city needs the revenue but this is a bad plan It is going to hurt Target and other businesses which are slow
enough the way it is Eden Prairie is not that far to do to Wal Mart Chanhassen Drug moved out after how many years
taken over by the big boys
We drive on Powers South to 5 every day numerous times and it is too busy and dangerous the way it is
Please vote no for this
Sincerely
Tom Lindemeier
email tlindemeier a mchsi com
373
Aanenson Kate
From Waltgrob @aol com
Sent Saturday October 15 2011 7 59 PM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject walmart
I am a resident of Chanhassen and do not feel we need or want a Walmart in our community We have enough
competition in our grocery and other stores
Walter G Roberts
2019 Clover Ct
Chanhassen Mn 55317
374
Aanenson Kate
From Tony Nuss tlnuss @mchsi com
Sent Sunday October 16 2011 9 37 AM
To Aanenson Kate
Cc Connie Nuss
Subject Proposed Walmart Site
Ms Aanenson
The purpose of this email is to communicate that I am not in favor of allowing a Walmart store in Chanhassen As
Community Development Director please know that I am concerned that it will diminish the small town feel of the city and
most importantly will negatively effect business owners in the community That is one of Walmart s legacies accross this
country
I appreciate your consideration in this matter
Tony L Nuss
9140 Springfield Drive
Chanhassen MN 55317
952 402 0625
375
Aanenson Kate
From Bader Tom Tom Bader @wolterskluwer com
Sent Monday October 17 2011 7 13 PM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject No Walmart
lam opposed to Walmart moving to Chanhassen
Thomas M Bader
Sales Manager Business Compliance
Wolters Kluwer Law Business
Phone Fax 877 347 6108
tom bader a wolterskluwer com
NOTICE This message and or attachment is a confidential business communication If you are NOT the intended recipient any further review storage distribution
or other use of content is prohibited If you received this message in error please notify sender and delete the correspondence Thank you
376
Aanenson Kate
From Donald Dahlquist donald dahlquist @mchsi com
Sent Tuesday October 18 2011 10 35 AM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Wal Mart Proposed Store
10 18 11
Dear Ms Anenson
The purpose of this letter is to request you and the City Council VOTE NO to the Wal Mart request to build in
Chanhassen MN
We understand the City Council s responsibility to govern our cities needs and especially revenues to support city needs
and delay property tax increases This is good this is your charter However adding a Big box Wal Mart store into our
downtown mix we feel is a negative for our community There is a Wal Mart only 8 miles east in Eden Prairie Our good
neighbors the CARVER MN city council and MINNETONKA MN city council both voted a proposed Wal Mart store
down in their communities We need to inquire WHY Why were they so positively decisive for their existing
community businesses
The comment of the possibility of Wal Mart paying 350 000 00 in annual taxes to the city comes across as if that was
in ADDITION TO tax revenue we currently receive to our fine city PLEASE understand from past history with a Wal Mart
being built in a city and village community this is not true The history of Wal Mart going into a city and the belief that
adding a big box store will increase consumer spending is also negative thinking There are only so many dollars
consumers have which in reality is spent at our current establishments OR would be at Wal Mart
The history of a Wal Mart being built in a community usually results is the closing of neighboring retail establishments
We are sure you agree this would be BAD Whole strips of retail stores closed provides a negative impact on the city s
image for any future business The tax revenue we currently receive from our existing retail businesses will STOP when
they close or be reduced so far that the 350 000 00 expected from Wal Mart will be awash in tax revenue gained
Other arguments are the possibility for more employment We tend to believe this is false If existing retail
establishments close some employees will try and be employed at Wal Mart so that is awash The others will just be
unemployed And again the history of Wal Mart salaries are very low the laid off employees from closed businesses
who might gain employment at Wal Mart most likely will not experience increased income as in their previous
employment Again we are being factual and analyzing Wal Mart history around the country The closeness of the
Eden Prairie Wal Mart and the placement of it in Eden Prairie in its major retail setting is completely opposite of our
village community environment If we turned down a Fleet Farm years ago to be located on 5 and 41 which would
have been twenty thirty miles away from another Fleet Farm why would we approve a Wal Mart that is only 8 miles
away from Chan
Thank You for studying the Wal Mart proposal thoroughly and concluding the negative impact on our community as
well as the reality of few if any real benefits that we might capture PLEASE vote NO to approving a Wal Mart store in
Chanhassen
Respectfully
377
Mr Mrs Donald B Dahlquist
7634 Prairie Flower Boulevard
Chanhassen MN 55317
378
Aanenson Kate
From ml2 @mchsi com
Sent Wednesday October 19 2011 9 52 AM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Wal mart
Is there any benefit to having a Wal mart in Chanhassen other than taxes
Michael Lalim
2089 Clover Ct
379
Aanenson Kate
From Taylor Pederson tcpeders @gmail com
Sent Wednesday October 19 2011 7 13 PM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Walmart Store
Please no Walmart
I grew up in Chanhassen and now my husband and I just bought our first home here We love the small town feel but
we worry that adding a Walmart would go against that We already have a Target store that s doing great We don t two
mega stores in one square mile There is already a Walmart 10 minutes away in Eden Prairie anyway If anything
Chanhassen could use a new restaurant or cafe in the neighborhood A place that the community could be proud of and
stand behind Walmart has been accused of poor business practices mistreatment of employees and pushing out local
businesses Is that something we really want to bring to our beautiful city
Please take this into consideration when discussing this matter
Thank you
Taylor Pederson
380
r ua 10 n7
C 4 0 v
Jw
381
Aanenson Kate
From pschrupp @mchsi com
Sent Friday October 28 2011 5 31 PM
To City Council
Cc Aanenson Kate
Subject Walmart
We would like to add our names to the citizens that are opposed the proposed building of a
Walmart in Chanhassen
Chanhassen continues to be named one of the best places to live in Minnesota and the
country Look at other cities that have earned that honor The majority of them do not
have a Walmart
The proposed location will require new streets stoplights we assume at taxpayer cost
There is a Target right across the corner from this location If Target loses business and
closes what would you do with that empty location
There is an Office Max across the corner from this locatin If Office Max loses business and
closes what would you do with that empty location We realize these are both big box
stores but their location draws people into town
The increased traffic perhaps 24 hours a day will require extra police coverage not only
near the store but in surrounding neighborhoods
While we recognize that we are more suburb than small town the extra lights from the parking
area will add to destroying the night sky in our area
There is ample evidence that a new Walmart in town ends up closing down local businesses The
wages and benefits or lack of benefits Walmart pays its employees would not support most
families that choose to live in Chanhassen most Walmart employees would drive in to work and
leave rather than spending their dollars at other Chanhassen businesses
If road construction allows shoppers easy in and out at Powers and Hwy 5 what incentive
would Walmart shoppers have to come into town to shop at other stores or eat at any of the
local restaurants We like that there is still a downtown Chanhassen We don t want to
end up like and Eden Prairie with malls and strip malls and no town center
We are heartsick at the thought of a Walmart being the western entryway to our city
While we appreciate that you are trying to grow our tax base please please use some
creativity There must be another option that would make a better neighbor than Walmart
Sincerely
Paul and Toni Schrupp
1
382
October 28 2011
City of Chanhassen C Ur Planning Commission REC EIVE D
7700 Market Boulevard OCT 3 1 2011 PO Box 147
Chanhassen Minnesota 55317 0147 CITY OF CHANHASSEN
Members of the City of Chanhassen Planning Commission
While I realize that a city needs to grow exactly why do we need a 100 000 square foot plus retail
establishment Is there not already enough retail in Chanhassen Do we really need a big box store
The rationale we are told is to create jobs and add to the property tax base So let us take a look at those
claims
Will a Wal Mart create jobs No doubt about it
Do not get me wrong I am all for creating jobs but what kind of jobs are we talking about After all Wal
Mart is known for paying mostly minimum wage jobs and providing health care for only a small percentage of its store employees As such Wal Mart is not going to create many high paying middle
class jobs Area lot of Chanhassen residents going to be applying for these jobs My guess is probably
not so such a development is not 1going do much for job creation for Chanhassen residents Is this the
type of employer that the City desiresZ l doubt it
Regardless of the jobs concerns let us look at the property tax base side of the equation In reviewing the Staff Report there are numerous infrastructure improvementsahat will be required including but not
limited to
An additional left turn lane for westbound Highway 5
An additional left turn lane for northbound Powers Boulevard
Addition of turn lanes and a median for Park Road
According to the Staff Report it will be up to the developer to pay for these improvements Does the City
really believe that Wal Mart will pay for such infrastructure improvements That would mark a radical
departure from past practices where municipalities pay for infrastructure improvements to get retail
development Given today s economy I find it hard to believe that Wal Mart is willing to sink close to a
million dollars for the three infrastructure changes recommended I am sure they will ask the City to pay
for these changes which according to the staff report are not budgeted for in any current or future
infrastructure budgets
find it interesting that the Staff Report does not recommend the addition of a traffic signal at Powers
Boulevard and Park Road With the traffic volumes projected at opening and into the future it seems like
a traffic light would be mandatory at this intersection yet none is specified I cannot even imagine the
traffic mess at this intersection without a traffic light It is literally an accident waiting to happen again
and again and again And traffic lights are not cheap particularly when it will have to be timed to a
number of other lights in the near vicinity I am just guessing that a trafficaight at Powers Boulevard and
Park Road will cost in ahe range of 200 000
Then there are the environmental issues According to the Staff Report because the site is near two
surface waters that have environmental issues the s ite will require that storm water runoff from the parking lot go through some sort of treatment before that water can enter Riley Creek and Lake Susan I
am sure that Wal Mart will not be willing to pick up the cost of this and will ask the City to pay for such an
improvement I have no idea what such a water treatment process would cost for such a space but I
383
City of Chanhassen Planning Commission
Wal Mart Store Proposal
October 28 2011
Page 2
have to imagine that it is not going to be cheap Then there is all of the issues of removal of the existing
watershed attributes of the site should the development be approved This will only further exacerbate
the issues regarding water quality in Riley Creek and Lake Susan
So based on my estimate the City is looking at least at a million plus dollars worth of infrastructure
improvements that Wal Mart will likely demand the City to somehow absorb
Then there is the variance that will be required for entry into the development According to the staff
report the site will not comply with code as the entrance to the development will be 40 feet short of code
between the entrance and the Powers Boulevard and Park Road intersection Based on the traffic
analysis presented this entry configuration will likely mean that during peak times traffic will back onto
Powers Boulevard in both directions as patrons attempt to enter the facility As a result it appears that
we will gain a traffic hazard with this plan
If all of the above does not kill this effort the eight code violations that are documented in the Staff Report
should kill it Some of these code issues are going to be impossible to justify and will likely violate State
laws and statutes So I do not know how the City can even consider this proposal realistic
I am sure that Wal Mart will demand property tax incentives to locate their store in Chanhassen as that is
standard operating procedure So in addition to the infrastructure costs the City will also likely have to
take a hit on property taxes As a result the net will likely be that the City will lose money on the deal for
at least the near term If that sounds familiar it should That is the same deal the City cut to get the
existing downtown development and we are still paying for that Seems to me that we are cutting off our
nose to spite our face if we move ahead with this proposal
But the strangest thing of all about this proposal is that the Staff Report points to a number of building
sites along the new 212 corridor that are more than appropriate for such a development So one has to
ask themselves why does Wal Mart want to locate its store at Powers Boulevard and Highway 5 when a
number of more appropriate sites are available along the 212 corridor I find it hard to believe that Wal
Mart is negligent and missed all of the code issues they were generating with their proposal So why is
Wal Mart proposing such a development at this location Could it be that Wal Mart deliberately wants to
destroy our existing downtown retailers I think that is the question the Planning Commission and City
leaders should be asking the representatives of Wal Mart Competition is fine but moving in with the
implicit plan of destroying a community s existing retail environment is reprehensible It is all the more
reprehensible given that as I recall we are still paying for our existing downtown through tax incentives
and other giveaways that were granted at the time
If Wal Mart wants to come to Chanhassen so be it But bending over backwards likely paying for
infrastructure improvements granting tax incentives and creating the kind of variances that will be
required to build on the proposed site just does not make any sense Chanhassen has plenty of more
appropriate sites for such a retail development I would recommend that the Planning Commission reject
this proposal and direct Wal Mart to more appropriate locations within the City
41 Fox Hollow Drive
Chanhassen Minnesota 55317
384
Aanenson Kate
From Mark Fuchs markjfuchs @yahoo com
Sent Monday October 31 2011 10 57 AM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Walmart Proposal
Dear Amy
Unfortunately we cannot attend the meeting but please know that our household 2 adults 2 children all vote to reject the
building of the wallmart in chanhassen
Sincerely
Mark and Carrie Fuchs
385
Aanenson Kate
From Patricia Hastreiter Patty Hastreiter@mpls k12 mn us
Sent Monday October 31 2011 1 19 PM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject No Walmart in Chanhassen
Kate Please forward this message to the Planning Commission members Thank you
Chanhassen Planning Commission Members
We are unfortunately unable to attend the Planning Commission Meeting tomorrow night but wanted to let you know
that we are very much opposed to allowing a Walmart to be built in Chanhassen We think it would be detrimental to
other nearby local businesses We think it would bring too much traffic to the area We don t like big box stores
especially Walmart They pay low wages and make it difficult for smaller businesses to compete There is already a big
box Target store which seems to sell a lot of the same merchandise as Walmart
We have lived in Chanhassen for 17 years We like it there and plan to stay We enjoy the trails and lakes and the
relative quietness of the area We like the Lakewinds Food Coop and Byerly s Our top concerns in Chanhassen do not
include property taxes The quality of life and ambiance of the area are much higher priorities to us We think that
Walmart would take some of that away
Sincerely
Patricia and James Hastreiter
6990 Tecumseh Lane
Chanhassen MN 55317
952 470 9057
386
Aanenson Kate
From Amy Severson aeeverson @nemerfieger com
Sent Monday October 31 2011 12 19 PM
To Aanenson Kate
Cc Amy Severson
Subject Please No Walmart in Chanhassen
Importance High
Hi Kate
I am so glad you are the person to contact to protest the proposed Walmart in Chanhassen You have made such a
beautiful city for us and to think a Walmart could come in and destroy our town is a crime I support and shop at my
downtown stores Target has been part of my life since I was a child
Please Don t compromise our town I will pay more in property taxes to keep it out and I think my neighbors would too
PS yep 1 am that Amy class of 76 and Sarah s mom
Thank You Kate for your consideration to this appeal
Amy Severson
Senior Account Executive
952 278 3123 direct
952 925 1907 fax
nemerfieger com
387
Aanenson Kate
From Jody Lane Ookoberg @yahoo com
Sent Monday October 31 2011 11 49 AM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Stop walmart
We live in chanhassen and DO NOT want Wal Mart coming here
PLEASE pass on your vote to NOT ALLOW WALMART TO BUILD IN CHANHASSEN
We will be at the meeting
Dave and Jody Lane
631 Bighorn Drive
388
Aanenson Kate
From Dave Lane daveelane @yahoo com
Sent Monday October 31 2011 2 45 PM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Walmart
Do not let Walmart build in Chanhassen
thanks
389
Aanenson Kate
To Megan Liebl
Subject RE Walmart in Chanhassen
From Megan Liebl mai1to mea 1iebWc1mai1 com1
Sent Monday October 31 20114 09 PM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Walmart in Chanhassen
Hello Ms Aannenson
I am aware that there is a planning meeting regarding the future of Chanhassen tomorrow evening at 7 00 pm Being
discussed is the proposal of allowing a Walmart store to be built and operated on the corner of Hwy 5 and Powers Blvd
As an active and very concerned citizen of Chanhassen please please please vote against this proposal
I m sure you ve received an overwhelming amount of feedback asking the same from other residents After seeing all of
the letters to the Chanhassen Villager talking with neighbors reading Facebook posts and other online chatter against
this proposal it s hard to believe the idea is even still on the table As your constituent please do your part on behalf of
your citizens and residents of Chanhassen and be our voice by voting against the proposal to build a Walmart in our nice
small town
My husband and I often say to each other I just LOVE Chanhassen while driving through town It has such the most
pleasant small town feel yet close enough to larger cities like Eden Prairie and Minnetonka As you know our city has
been ranked very high on multiple Best Places to Live lists
The addition of a Walmart would not only bump our lovely Chanhassen down on those lists but it would surely put the
smaller shops and stores around town out of business We were so saddened to learn of Chanhassen Center Drug s closing
and now Somebody s House just a few doors down but this would be just the beginning if a Walmart is thrown into the
mix It would be tragic to see a business like Walmart take business and revenue away from stores like Target Cub Foods
Byerly s Lakewinds and all of the smaller shops passing this vote would negatively impact
Not only for the above stated reasons is a Walmart in Chanhassen a bad idea but also for these and beyond
Increased traffic in a bad location I cross the intersection of multiple times every day This area is already
congested without a Walmart on that corner There are pedestrians trying to cross in the crosswalks Add more
traffic there and you re just asking for trouble
There is a nearby Walmart in downtown Eden Prairie
Poor business practices Some may say the addition would bring job to the community but Walmart is notorious
for paying as low as possible wages and giving as few hours as possible to all staff to avoid having to pay for
healthcare benefit etc
Increased crime rate Just read this study http www walmartcrimeroort com report pdf The study states that
Wal Mart stores had more calls for service than nearby Target stores For the sample the average rate of
reported police incidents at Wal Mart stores was 400 higher than the average rate of incidents at nearby Target
stores and 6 times higher for the number of reported criminal incidents defined as serious or violent
Again p lease vote against a Walmart in Chanhassen We really don t need one and there would be many more adverse
affects than positive implications to building one
Thank you for your work
Megan Liebl Chanhassen
390
Aanenson Kate
From Susan Wuollett @wellsfargo com
Sent Monday October 31 2011 6 28 PM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Walmart
Hi Kate
I wanted to let you know that my husband and I are concerned with the potential new walmart
proposal for hwy 5 and powers
I have read the proposal and I was torn for about a week knowing the added sales tax may be
a benefit to the city Since this walmart will be the furthest west it will likely draw in
people from the western suburbs who currently drive into eden prairie to go to walmart
However I believe the possible negative side effects outweigh the positive I am concerned
with the crime that Walmarts tend to attract and the potential harm to the current small
businesses and boutiques we have in chan Although the walmart would bring new job
opportunities I have read the numbers and many of those will simply be removed or relocated
from current chan businesses and all are lower paying jobs
Although I understand the financial benefits are tempting please vote no to preserve the
small town classy that makes chanhassen special and made my husband and I relocate from the
northern suburbs to live here
Thank you
Susie Wuollett
720 Bighorn Drive Chanhassen
1
391
The Community Development Director received calls from the following people stating they are
opposed to the Walmart proposal
Gloria Leone
Jane Osterfeld
Kay Faust
392
Aanenson Kate
From KIMBERLY MCREAVY ktmtmcreavy @msn com
Sent Tuesday November 01 20114 20 PM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Wal Mart proposal
Hi Kay
I just want to voice opposition for the proposed Wal Mart which is up for Planning Commission review tonight My
husband and I are against the project for multiple reasons including increased traffic and potential detriment to existing
Chanhassen businesses
Please pass our input along to the Planning Commission as we are not able to attend in person
Thank you
Kim and Tom McReavy
1350 Heather Court
Chanhassen
393
Aanenson Kate
From Cook Jamie M JMCook @cbburnet com
Sent Tuesday November 01 2011 4 53 PM
Subject Plz say no to walmart
Good afternoon
My husband and I have been Chanhassen residents for many years kids attend Chan Elementary We would
like to voice our concerns and do not want the Planning Commission City Council to allow Walmart to build a
faculty off of Hwy 5 and Powers We feel as many others do that the charm of Chanhassen could be lost
forever
Have you completed a traffic study I imagine that would costly Traffic is major concern for all with the
possibility of hundreds of cars a day traveling on Powers and into Chanhassen How will it affect the events
we have at Lake Ann such as 4th of July and Miracles for Mitch We have nothing against shopping at a
Walmart and believe this type of business facility would be much better suited if it were located somewhere
off of 212 and not in the heart of Chanhassen The proposed logistics is truly perplexing
We shop at our local stores and can see how such a large conglomerate would really affect these business
such as the local hardware store As Chan residents we are fortunate to say we still have many small
businesses and the feel of a small town that s why we live and raise our kids in Chan and not in Plymouth or
Eden Prairie I have no doubt that when Target came to town it was opposed by many too but Target it is a
smaller store that is not overwhelming for the space nor traffic in Chan Plus Target that gives back to the
community Will having Walmart affect the money that is given back to the Chanhassen schools
I am sure you are under pressure to hear the many voices of the Chan residents and I will predict they will be
loud voices on this topic Please vote to turn down this proposal
Regards
Jamie and Jeff Cook
The information in this electronic mail message is the sender s confidential business and may be legally privileged It is intended
solely for the addressee s Access to this internet electronic mail message by anyone else is unauthorized If you are not the
intended recipient any disclosure copying distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and
may be unlawful
The sender believes that this E mail and any attachments were free of any virus worm Trojan horse and or malicious code when
sent This message and its attachments could have been infected during transmission By reading the message and opening any
attachments the recipient accepts full responsibility for taking protective and remedial action about viruses and other defects The
sender s employer is not liable for any loss or damage arising in any way from this message or its attachments
394
Aanenson Kate
From Don Draper donrdraper @msn com
Sent Tuesday November 01 2011 5 14 PM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Walmart Yes
I m very much in favor of a Walmart here It will be a great convenience add jobs and opportunity Please vote to allow
it
Thanks
Don Draper
395
Aanenson Kate
To Tim Amlie
Subject RE Walmart Building
Hi Kate
I had hoped to come to the meeting tonight but I have a cold coming on that I don t want to spread it or hopefully make it
worse Hopefully you can pass this on
I am in complete support of the proposed Walmart plan After taking time to drive around the area and seeing that it does
not sit next to any residential real estate I feel it does not bring about problems that so many are voicing via the
newspaper or facebook where I have already posted Had it been next to housing I may have a different opinion
Those complaining about traffic may have forgotten about the mall that at one time and hopefully will come back
planned at Lyman and Powers that would bring traffic onto Powers as well It is already a 4 lane road which is more
than the Super Target sees in Chaska around it
In terms of economic value it is huge We have a number of residents in this community that would benefit from jobs
from high school age to retirees looking for something Sales tax revenue AND the property tax revenue would be much
greater than what we see from the current building at that site
In a community our size we need more shopping opportunity The businesses in downtown Chanhassen are not the type
to be affected by a big box store they are specialty shops The only real competition will be for Target and quite
honestly they need some Target could have expanded to a Super Target in our community but decided against We
have the largest retailer in the world knocking on our door in this economy I think that shows a lot for us People have
complained that we don t have enough good eating establishments in our community Bringing in this type of retail will
bring along those types of businesses even a Walmart I grew up between Alexandria and Willmar both towns have
Super Walmart stores and the areas directly around them have brought in many eating establishments etc because of the
area becoming a shopping stop point It will bring revenue to gas stations and the other stores as well
My family owned a sporting goods store in St Cloud for many years it is still operating under new owners We
absolutely feared the big box stores coming to town We were wrong People may have purchased items at the big box
stores but when it came to after sale service and second purchases they came to us Business was incredible the new
owners have even expanded since we sold off 12 years ago
The bottom line is I want to spend my money in my community Those who are against Walmart don t have to shop
there In fact those who are so against building it should pitch in towards the tax revenue our city would miss out if it
isn t built Additionally those who would most benefit from this business probably can t even make this meeting or have
the ability to voice their opinion If one does the math in our community of nearly 23 000 I m guessing the percentage
of those against but making a big stink would be pretty small
Thank you
Sincerely
Tim Amlie
8796 North Bay Drive
396
Aanenson Kate
From Jim gimthomas1 @msn com
Sent Sunday November 20 2011 6 13 PM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Re Walmart
Sorry found two spelling mistakes so fixed them Jimt
On 11 20 20116 10 PM Jim wrote
Dear Kate Aanenson
I want to express my support for Walmart at the corner of Hwy 5 and Powers I live 4 blocks from this area and love
having Target nearby hence the support for Walmart
I realize some local merchants such as Ace Hardware are concerned about Walmart Dr Sobel West Virginia University
Economics Professor has published a paper which concludes Wal Mart s presence simply has had no impact on the
overall size or profitability of the U S small business sector Personally I would continue shopping at Ace I love that
store
am surprised by the Planning Commission findings In particular why concerns about Riley Creek The proposal does
not appear to change the current impact on the creek as developed by the previous owner Also why is 586 parking
spaces a magic number Target has less than that and uses less than 40 of those spaces for 364 days per year I noticed
there is concern about only two entrances Target has only two although one is shared with three other businesses
While I did not live in Chanhassen when Target was approved there seems to be two different standards being applied
The submitter says the proposal was prepared in accordance with the City of Chanhassen s Code of Ordinances My
question to the city is did you pro actively work with the submitter because the resounding vote against their proposal
implies lack of communication and shared understanding
This year I was asked to pay for paving of Santa Vera Dr Clearly the city does not have enough funds to pay for paving its
own roads the tax revenue from Walmart would make a big difference to what the city council can sponsor
Jim Thomas
938 Kimberly LN
Chanhassen MN
397
Aanenson Kate
From Brenda Johnson bdr6466 @yahoo com
Sent Thursday November 03 2011 11 42 AM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Re Say NO to WalMart
Hi Kate
I wanted to elaborate if you don t mind There are many reasons as to why I don t shop at WalMart
Besides the atmosphere WalMart has as a shopping experience this store as a whole incorporates
international vendors as the majority a very much non US supporting company I ve also heard that
WalMart doesn t treat their employees well the average rate of pay is very low and they have many
ethical issues resoviing in a negative community as far as the people they hire and the crowd this
type of store brings in
I wanted to correct myself below when I stated this will raise the robbery rate What I meant to
convey is the crime rate in towns that incorporate a WalMart are generally higher than those that
don t
I appreciate the opportunity to voice my opinion in this matter
Thank you
Brenda
From Aanenson Kate kaanenson cDci chanhassen mn us
To Brenda Johnson bdr6466 cDyahoo com
Sent Thursday November 3 2011 8 11 AM
Subject RE Say NO to WalMart
I have received your email and will forward it to the city Council
Kate
From Brenda Johnson mailto bdr6466 a yahoo coml
Sent Wednesday November 02 20119 06 PM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Say NO to WalMart
Kate
I ve been a resident of Chanhassen for 7 years I m very proud of this community and feel a sense of comfort
and safety in living here It makes me nervous just thinking of a WalMart coming to this community The
additional traffic is only a portion of the problems this community would be getting with allowing a WalMart
here The clientele it brings scares me If WalMart comes here I would prefer to stay away from the
Chanhassen downtown area and do all my shopping normally done in Chanhassen to the Minnetonka or Eden
Prairie areas And I can see this happening with other residence of Chanhassen as well There is a WalMart just
6 miles down Hwy 5 in Eden Prairie which I don t shop in I know prices are normally better at a WalMart but I
refuse to shop there I don t understand why they would build so close to an existing store If they want to
move west they should be moving much further out where people actually need a big box store WalMart
should be building in a town that needs it we don t need it or want it I see no good with bringing this store to
an area like this This town is a safe comfortable friendly town Bringing in a store like WalMart will only
398
bring in the wrong type of people the robbery rate will rise the Chanhassen stores will loose business by
residence no longer feeling comfortable shopping in the area Say goodbye to the town that was voted second
best town to live in by Money Magazine Please vote NO to Wa1Mart
Best Regards
Brenda Rice
399
Aanenson Kate
To Isaac Will
Subject RE Walmart is not needed in Chanhassen
From Isaac Will mailto isaacrwill @gmail coml
Sent Wednesday November 02 2011 11 42 PM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Walmart is not needed in Chanhassen
Hello
I wasn t able to attend the hearing on the 1 st but I wanted to take a minute to write you personally I don t
believe that the location or the business is necessary in Chanhassen With the direct impact to local businesses
which I try to support as much as possible I dread the day that Walmart would reduce my shopping options
am in my early 30 s plan on living in this house for at least the next 15 years and have two kids who will be
going through the Chanhassen school system I love Chanhassen I love Na s Pad Thai I already have 3
options for groceries within walking distance do we really need another
Walmart is not bad evil or would bring on the downfall of Chanhassen It is just not needed here If anything
it has given residents something to rally around The jobs they need will do little for the community especially
if you take into account the established jobs we ll loose I am proud of Chanhassen it really is a great place to
live I just don t think Walmart fits who we are or who we want to be
Plus throw on the fact that the land is not zoned for their proposed plan the extra city cost to modify and
maintain infrastructure and the spatial separation from the existing shopping district I just don t see it as a
viable opportunity
Thank you for your time
Sincerely
Isaac Will
400
Aanenson Kate
From Brenda Johnson bdr6466 @yahoo com
Sent Wednesday November 02 2011 9 06 PM
To Aanenson Kate
Subject Say NO to WalMart
Kate
I ve been a resident of Chanhassen for 7 years I m very proud of this community and feel a sense of
comfort and safety in living here It makes me nervous just thinking of a WalMart coming to this
community The additional traffic is only a portion of the problems this community would be getting
with allowing a WalMart here The clientele it brings scares me If WalMart comes here I would
prefer to stay away from the Chanhassen downtown area and do all my shopping normally done
in Chanhassen to the Minnetonka or Eden Prairie areas And I can see this happening with other
residence of Chanhassen as well There is a WalMart just 6 miles down Hwy 5 in Eden Prairie which
I don t shop in I know prices are normally better at a WalMart but I refuse to shop there I don t
understand why they would build so close to an existing store If they want to move west they should
be moving much further out where people actually need a big box store WalMart should be building
in a town that needs it we don t need it or want it I see no good with bringing this store to an area
like this This town is a safe comfortable friendly town Bringing in a store like WalMart will only
bring in the wrong type of people the robbery rate will rise the Chanhassen stores will loose
business by residence no longer feeling comfortable shopping in the area Say goodbye to the town
that was voted second best town to live in by Money Magazine Please vote NO to WalMart
Best Regards
Brenda Rice
401
Aanenson Kate
Subject FW Contact Request Admin
From bicobb2004 @yahoo com rmailto bicobb2004 @yahoo com1
Sent Wednesday November 02 20113 15 PM
To Engelhardt Karen
Subject Contact Request Admin
Website Contact Email
Name Barbara Cobb
Address 8479 Powers Place
Email bicobb2004 n yahoo com
Unfortunately my husband and I were unable to attend last night s planning commission m eeting to state our opposition to the
proposed Walmart plans On principle we do not currently shop at Walmart or Sam s Club as we vehemently oppose their business
practices most importantly towards their employees The fact that they will be just up the road will not change the fact that we will
not shop there The fact that they would be just up the the road is also major concern for us The back of our twinhome is directly
on Powers Blvd Traffic has increased markedly since the opening of 212 which is understandable Powers Blvd may be a 4 lane
road but it is still a residential area Despite the posted speed limits average speeds are closer to between 50 and 55 miles an hour
Comments with cars changing lanes to get around the the slower vehicles It s hard enough to get out of our complex at times and to walk
across the road is even harder especially since our corner has no cross walks even with croswalks you take your life in your
hands just like the Instant Web employees do Traffic is certainly not going to decrease with the building of a Walmart Not only
will it increase but there will be an increase in semi traffic as well We understand the potential income etc that will be brought in
to the community but at what cost to the area I don t agree with Target s practice of putting stores in such close proximity to each
other and I certainly don t like the idea of a chain such as Walmart doing the same We are hoping that you will think seriously
before agreeing to this project Barbara and David Cobb
402
Say No to rezoning Powers Blvd and Park Road in Chanhassen MN 1030
Name City State Zip Country SignedOn
Wendy OConnor Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 17 2011
Shelley Kerber Excelsior MN 55331 USA 10 17 2011
Mary Yazvec Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
stephanie rutledge Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Jennifer Weiner Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Laurie Hernandez Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Kate McGuire Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Mary Pernula Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Carol Anderson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Scott Wosje Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Abby Ellis Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Laura Gustayson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Aimee O Malley Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Kristin Walters Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
carolyn thomson chanhassei MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Laura Doten Shorewoo MN 55331 USA 10 17 2011
kristin stohl victoria MN 55386 USA 10 17 2011
Jeff Anderson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Craig O Connor Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Mary beth silbernagel Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Leah Plath Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Vera Tschida Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Cindy Brodigan Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Natalie Christenson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Marceline Valenty Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Pam Hrubes Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
jason white Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Laurie Johnson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Elizabeth Kressler Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 17 2011
Amber White Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Mark Johnson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Jenny Pharis Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Ted Ellefson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Todd Neils Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
John L Bell Destin FL 32540 USA 10 17 2011
Vicki Eastwood Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Ross Huseby Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Ingrid Steele Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Judy Anderson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
David Kressler Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Angela Magnuson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Angie Ellefson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Gerald Wolfe Chanhasse MN 55317 450 USA 10 17 2011
Christina Salek Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Molly Ambrose Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Stacy Beno chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
a u la IBPrn
0
403
Say No to rezoning Powers Blvd and Park Road in Chanhassen MN
Holly White Chanhasse MN 553 USA 10 17 2011
Kelly Koemptgen Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Sue Boski Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Susanne Cantlin Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Kyla Spencer Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Kari Okonek Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Meredith Johnson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Sandy McNeill Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Melissa Crow Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Paul Coroneos Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Jessica Anderson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 17 2011
Kristine Beer Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 18 2011
Patrick Beer Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 18 2011
Karen Walker Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 18 2011
Elise Coroneos Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 18 2011
Debra Ludford chanhassei MN 55317 USA 10 18 2011
Cameron Olsen Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 18 2011
JACKIE JACOBSON CHANHAS MN 55317 USA 10 18 2011
kathleen vankrevelen Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 18 2011
CeCelia Smith Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 18 2011
Leslie Witterschein Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 18 2011
Cheryl Stanton Chanhasse MN I don t war USA 10 18 2011
Christine Anfinson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 18 2011
Johanna Heggelman Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 18 2011
Stan Valensky Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 18 2011
Allison Newman Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 18 2011
Theresa Bergren Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 18 2011
Emily Brisse Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 18 2011
Sharon Kraus Chanhassen 55317 United Sta 10 18 2011
Jessica Diaz Chanhassen 55317 United Sta 10 18 2011
Brian Diaz Chanhassen 55317 United Sta 10 18 2011
Tamara Sather Chanhassen 55317 United Sta 10 18 2011
Sue Berger Minneapolis 55419 111 United Sta 10 18 2011
Rick Tonsing Fair Oaks CA 95628 USA 10 18 2011
Tonya Stier Chanhassen 55317 United Sta 10 18 2011
Maria Knox Chanhassen 55317 United Sta 10 18 2011
Jennifer Pauling Chanhassen 55317 United Sta 10 18 2011
Allison Lang Chaska 55318 United Sta 10 18 2011
Erika Carrillo chanhassen 55317 United Sta 10 18 2011
Jan Gniffke Chanhassen 55317 United Sta 10 18 2011
Laurel Kiesow chanhassen 55317 United Sta 10 18 2011
Gary Spencer Chanhassen 55317 United Sta 10 18 2011
Margaret Emerson Chanhassen 55317 United Sta 10 18 2011
Lisa Patrin Chanhassen 55317 United Sta 10 18 2011
Katy Anderson Chanhassen 553 171 United Sta 10 18 2011
Ashley Browning Chanhassen 55317J United Sta 10 18 2011
Lisa Arrington Chanhassen 55317J United Sta 10 18 2011
404
Say No to rezoning Powers Blvd and Park Road in Chanhassen MN
Amy Steffen Chanhassen 55317 United Sta 10 18 2011
John and Stacey Bosacki Chanhassen 55317 United Sta 10 18 2011
Karl Wandling chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 18 2011
Victor Escobar Midlothiar VA 23113 USA 10 19 2011
Sarah Dritz Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Jennifer Fritz Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Kathryn Bader Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Robin Anderson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Pam Schwarz Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Maria Elgren Chanhaser MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Lisa Nebel Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Laura Helmer Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Thomas Bader Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Daniel Ryan Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Kim Klingelhutz Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Susan Fagan Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Ana Moritz Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Blair Elgren Chanhasse MN We do not USA 10 19 2011
Debra Lochner Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Susan Hoffa Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
mary self Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Barbara Link Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
kathy kuhl chanhassei MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Glenn Kaufmann Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Lisa Wing Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Suzanne Huwald Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Alysson Gebauer Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
john manuel chanhassei MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Kristie Hennig Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Judy Monn Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Susan Sampson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Christine Meier Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Laurie Lisignoli Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Paul Dorn Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Jane Dorn Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Annette Snyder Fossum Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Lance Huwald Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
joseph tschida chanhassei MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Jonathan Ortner Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Holly Mell Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Carol Berg Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Julie Swenson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Louise Manno Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
james m nordlund Fargo ND 58102 USA 10 19 2011
Cara Rainey lChanahsse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Caroline Nelson Eden Prairi MN 55347 USA 10 19 2011
Angela Gauer IChaska MN 55318 USA 10 19 2011
405
Say No to rezoning Powers Blvd and Park Road in Chanhassen MN
Michael Grabner Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Nicole Cleland Richfield MN 55423 USA 10 19 2011
Joan Reynders Chanhasse MN 5517 USA 10 19 2011
David Williams Victoria MN 55386 USA 10 19 2011
Kathleen Albrecht Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Jane Anderson Chanhasse MN 55331 USA 10 19 2011
Mary Brink Chaska MN 55318 USA 10 19 2011
Katie Gutierrez Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Stephanie Saltzman Edina MN 55436 USA 10 19 2011
c callahan Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Annette Stock Lind Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Kathy O Connor Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Keri Buisman Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Janet Rzonca Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Fred Berg Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Sheila Erickson chanhassei MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
David Stockdale Excelsior MN 553C31 USA 10 19 2011
Karen Hoyle Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Jerry Cerchia Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Beth Miller Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Alyce Bell Chanhasse MN 55317 855 USA 10 19 2011
Jean Hess Chanhasse MN We do not USA 10 19 2011
Michelle Williams Victoria MN 55386 USA 10 19 2011
Bruce Helmer Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Bev Gellert Carver MN 55315 USA 10 19 2011
Bebe Paulson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Janice Johnson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
scoff paulson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Ila Wheeler Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Dave Vieau Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Dan Mertes Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Phyllis Wachutka Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Steve Cannon Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Dallas Nelson chaska MN 55318 USA 10 19 2011
Donald B Dahlquist Chanhaser MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Alexandra Emerton Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Julie Burns MN MN Bad idea al USA 10 19 2011
SUE RIES CHANHAS MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
mari hart chanhassei MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Kyle Renner Chanhasse MN Walmart USA 10 19 2011
Valerie Pass Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Leo Hofineister Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Pamela Olund Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Gloria Lindberg Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Jill Schmid Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Nikki Renner Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
kim motschenbacher Chaska MN 55318 USA 10 19 2011
406
Say No to rezoning Powers Blvd and Park Road in Chanhassen MN
Adam Erdmann Excelsior MN 55331 USA 10 19 2011
Sally Nordmeyer Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Barbara Bode Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Susan Von Fruke Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Mary Ann Manuel chanhassei MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
John Bergo Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Alec McKinley Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Aaron Stroeing Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Tony Evangelista Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Tony Marengo Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Nanci Olson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Mark Olson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Douglas Ahmann Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Jodi Holden Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Nancy Stanger Chaska MN 55318 USA 10 19 2011
damaris hernandez chaska MN 55318 USA 10 19 2011
Heide Ahmann Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Amanda Chase Carver MN 55315 USA 10 19 2011
Nancy Cardwell Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Michael Moritz Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
William Brown Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 19 2011
Nadia Janson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Mary Leirdahl Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Laura Brannon CHANHAS MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Courtney Cannon Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Chanh Nguyen Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
gail montana chanhassei MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Elisabeth Kelly Washingto DC 20016 United Sta 10 20 2011
Jessica Olson Minneapol MN 55408 USA 10 20 2011
Jesse Sutton Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Mike Seifert Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 20 2011
Bev Gossard chanhassei MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Jarby Blackmun Chanhaser MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Patricia Hawke Victoria MN 55386 USA 10 20 2011
Bonnie Marsh Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Jane Morgan chanhassei MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Sarah Ferderer Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Margaret Standafer Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Zhanetta Lundberg Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Barry Mckinney Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Kelly Boss Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Gordon Buchanan Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
jan chatmas chanhassei MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Kay Paterson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Sandy Opheim Chanhasse MN 553171 USA 10 20 2011
Kristin Mattson Chanhasse MN 553171 USA 10 20 2011
Kirk Sampson Chanhasse MN 553171 USA 1 10 20 2011
407
Say No to rezoning Powers Blvd and Park Road in Chanhassen MN
Katie Lloyd Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
John Kreger Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Leland O Brien Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Amy Olson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Mary Gallardo Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Marshane Lindstrom Excelsior MN 55331 USA 10 20 2011
Nancy Hall chanhassei MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Kersten Herold Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Bev Bell Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Stacy Lee Scholder Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Peter McCall Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Kim Schaeferle Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
k h Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Kristi Kahana Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Cathy Holmes Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Nancy Lynch Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Cindy Seal Victoria MN 55386 USA 10 20 2011
Barb Brown Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Jordan Perttu Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 20 2011
Beth Adams Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Todd Michels Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Brian Tuomala Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Scott Yager Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Alex Fossum Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
James Deno Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Andrea Deno Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Janet Adamski Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
MICHAEL MATTSON CHANHAS MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
clan pavlovich chanhassei MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Jim Fisher Shorewoo MN 55331 USA 10 21 2011
Katherine Fischenich Victoria MN 55386 USA 10 21 2011
Derek Sorenson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Michael Neiman Minneapol MN 55403 USA 10 21 2011
Joan Skaff Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Max Anderson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
BethAnn Leonard Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
diane freeman Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Paul Ryan Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Pamela Carlson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Julie Beyer Fitzgerald Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Pat Loge Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Wayne Mader Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Kevin Fitzgerald Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Julie Littfin Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Lisa McCall Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Deborah Mitchell lChanhasse MN 55317 USA 1 10 21 2011
Veronica Perttu lChanhasse MN I 55317 USA 1 10 21 2011
408
Say No to rezoning Powers Blvd and Park Road in Chanhassen MN
Kellan Fitzgerald Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Jay Kronick Chanahhss MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Anthony Rockwell Eden Prairi MN 55344 USA 10 21 2011
Pamela Murphy Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Meghan Maloney St Louis Pi MN 55416 USA 10 21 2011
Fred Cuneo Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Joel Jenkins Chanhasse MN I believe tl USA 10 21 2011
Dorothy Downing Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Sean Connelly Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Sherill Coumbe Chanhasse MN 55331 USA 10 21 2011
Susan Wollan Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Jennifer Grabner Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Jane Evangelista Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Brad Karels Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Sally Ryan Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 21 2011
Stacy King Minneapol MN 55417 USA 10 21 2011
Cheryl Fischer Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 22 2011
Jackie McCarthy Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 22 2011
Julie Yager Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 22 2011
Patti Ferguson Chanhassn MN 55317 USA 10 22 2011
Tony Ferguson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 22 2011
Amy Sampson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 22 2011
Florence Sheesley Saint Joser MN 56374 USA 10 22 2011
Kristin Berg Prior Lake MN 55372 USA 10 22 2011
Amy Jarrard Minneapol MN 55403 USA 10 22 2011
Paul Spencer Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 22 2011
Jenny Spencer Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 22 2011
Rosemary Soltis Chanhassen 55317 Uganda 10 22 2011
Laurie Sudol Clarkdale AZ 86324 USA 10 22 2011
Scott Hippen Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 22 2011
Marcia Hippen Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 22 2011
Gary Lehman Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 22 2011
Jennifer Doan Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 22 2011
Ann Dalhoff Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 23 2011
Liesa Sanya Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 23 2011
Renee Pederson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 23 2011
Ted Tigue Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 23 2011
Amy Kaehler Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 23 2011
Kathy Gavert Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 23 2011
Dwight Gaddis Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 23 2011
Dwight Gaddis Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 23 2011
Peggy Stevenson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 23 2011
Diane Swenson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 23 2011
Robb Swenson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 23 2011
Amy Rolland Martinek 55331 MN 55331 USA 10 23 2011
JoAnn Quackenbush Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 23 2011
Austen Edman River Falls IWI 54022 USA 10 23 2011
409
Say No to rezoning Powers Blvd and Park Road in Chanhassen MN
Dana V Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 23 2011
Nico Haight Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 23 2011
Julie Lohse Chaska MN 55318 USA 10 23 2011
Emily Fliss Chaska MN 55318 USA 10 23 2011
Gennadiy Vavrenyuk Tacoma WA 98433 USA 10 23 2011
Beth Hiss Chaska MN 55318 USA 10 23 2011
Brandi Crotty Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 23 2011
Austin Johnson Saint Bonif MN 55375 USA 10 23 2011
Shelly Franceschi Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Melissa McNeill Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Margaret DiMarco Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Paul Palmer Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Joseph Wise Chaska MN 55318 USA 10 24 2011
Jessica Roschen Minnesota MN 56001 USA 10 24 2011
Robert Schaefer Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Maureen Grebin Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Debbie Kaplan Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Jeanne MacFarlane Excelsior MN 55331 USA 10 24 2011
KENT LUDFORD CHANHAS MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
KATHLEEN MADER CHANHAS MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Brian Boie Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Mary Sutton Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
john hagedorn chanhassei MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Tom Smith Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Barbara white Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Sanam Favrow Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Scott Pharis Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Arlan Monderewicz reading PA 19609 USA 10 24 2011
Tina Shear Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Kathy Beery Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Shirley Vinkemeier Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Daniel Mueller Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Andrea Hawley Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Andrea Kremer Hawley Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Susan Bartenetti Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
karen gibney chanhassei MN 55317 United Sta 10 24 2011
joe gibney chanhassei MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
John Hawley Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Bill Fisher Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Olivia Kressler Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Dawn Erdman Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 24 2011
Emily Rozanski Minneapol MN 55419 USA 10 25 2011
Anne Wicka Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 25 2011
Tarrah Mueller Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 25 2011
Christy Lee shorewoo MN 1 55331 USA 10 25 2011
Thomas Faust Chanhasse MN I 55317 USA 10 25 2011
mark zaebst chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 25 2011
410
Say No to rezoning Powers Blvd and Park Road in Chanhassen MN
courtney kramer Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 25 2011
Alan Kramer Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 25 2011
Rob Martinson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 25 2011
Tammy Brady Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 25 2011
James Pedersen Excelsior MN 55331 USA 10 25 2011
Tracey Reichert Chaska MN 55318 USA 10 25 2011
Travis Quinlan Burnsville MN 55306 USA 10 25 2011
Brittany Liebl Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 25 2011
Hilary Shadier Wayzata MN 55391 USA 10 25 2011
brian liebl chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 25 2011
Samantha Lee Bloomingt MN 55438 USA 10 25 2011
Rhiana Payer Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 25 2011
Jeff Adams Saint Louis MN 55416 USA 10 25 2011
Kendra Gruman Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 25 2011
Jessica Tait Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 25 2011
Lee Thorson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 25 2011
Tracey Dreshfield Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 25 2011
Michael Kamerud Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 25 2011
Linda Kramer Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 25 2011
Robert Filippi Excelsior MN 55331 USA 10 25 2011
Deborah Shillam Keighley BD22 United Kin 10 25 2011
Allyson Segar Cohen Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 25 2011
Steven Cohen Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 25 2011
craig warner Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 25 2011
Monica Wiant Excelsior MN 55331 USA 10 25 2011
Lauri Schauer Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 25 2011
Shelley Vandermeide Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Jason Barber Shorewoo MN 55331 USA 10 26 2011
Barbara Kayati Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Richard Peters Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
peggy Kronick Chaska MN 55318 USA 10 26 2011
Debbie Lloyd Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Betsy LePlatt Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Ginny Watkins Minneton MN 55345 USA 10 26 2011
Diane Crannell Chaska MN 55318 USA 10 26 2011
Katja Jeanneret Chanhasse MN With num USA 10 26 2011
Joan Ahrens Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Neil libson chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Kristi Jereska chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Susan dreves libson chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Lynn Speaker Eden Prairi MN 55346 USA 10 26 2011
Melissa Young Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Jennifer Jorgenson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Sara Brown Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Karey White Chanhasse MN 1 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Patricia Peterson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Jessica Jorgensen Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
411
Say No to rezoning Powers Blvd and Park Road in Chanhassen MN
Steve Taborek chanhasen MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Laurie Kurmis Chanhasse MN 55345 USA 10 26 2011
Misty Ojanpa Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Debra Pladsen Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
MariBeth Schulke eden prair MN 55347 USA 10 26 2011
Erin Strot Eden Prair MN 55346 USA 10 26 2011
Ryan Brown Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Jason Strot Chaska MN 55318 USA 10 26 2011
becky ludvigson eden prairi MN 55346 USA 10 26 2011
Sara Gorham Shakopee MN 55379 USA 10 26 2011
Lindsay Strot Chaska MN 55318 USA 10 26 2011
McDonald Winton Excelsior MN 55331 USA 10 26 2011
Sharon Harris Chanhasse MN We don t v USA 10 26 2011
James Walker Janesville WI 53548 USA 10 26 2011
John White Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Martha McNeill Excelsior MN 55331 USA 10 26 2011
Andrew Lemkuil Chanhasse MN 55331 USA 10 26 2011
Natasha Reilly Chanhasssi MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
David Brackett Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Tom Miller Shorewoo MN 55331 USA 10 26 2011
Robert Panos Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Katie Kirschbaum Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Dianne Brackett Deephaver MN 55391 USA 10 26 2011
Kim Simenson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
branden strot eden prairi MN 55346 USA 10 26 2011
Ginny Watkins Minneton MN 55345 USA 10 26 2011
Amy Lemkuil Chanhasse MN 55331 USA 10 26 2011
Kerry Simenson Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Robert Schwartz Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
Candace DeCosse Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Chris Oster Chaska MN 55318 United Sta 10 26 2011
Brian Kummrow MINNETOr MN 55343 United Sta 10 26 2011
Sarah McGinn Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Susan Seward Chanhasssi MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Britton McGinn Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Laura Woelfel Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Stuart Powers Richfield MN 55423 United Sta 10 26 2011
Jenna Pederson Edina MN 55343 United Sta 10 26 2011
Jeff Burke Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Rebecca Brick Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Chris Engel Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Debbie Engel Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Jill Ramsey chanhassei MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Jared Gehle Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Nicole Hamad Minneapol MN 55425 United Sta 10 26 2011
Bonnie Houck Victoria MN 55386J United Sta 10 26 2011
Will McMillan Eden Prairi MN 553461 United Sta 10 26 2011
412
Say No to rezoning Powers Blvd and Park Road in Chanhassen MN
Anne Marie Lambert Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Patrick Lambert Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Tracy Wilson Maple Gro MN 55311 United Sta 10 26 2011
Pat Potter Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Rhonda Perkins Excelsior MN 55331 United Sta 10 26 2011
Mackenzie McMillan Eden Prairi MN 55346 United Sta 10 26 2011
sally heard chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Mark Schumacher Victoria MN 55386 United Sta 10 26 2011
Katie Johnson Maple Gro MN 55311 United Sta 10 26 2011
Jennifer Niland Mpls MN 55407 United Sta 10 26 2011
charles littfin chanhassei MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Nicole Campion Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
thomas potter chanhassei MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Karen Cox Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Dan Campion Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Robert Egelston Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 26 2011
MariAna Ebenreiter Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Cindy Egelston Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Nick Sandstrom Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
karleen lutter Minneapol MN 55410 USA 10 26 2011
tony heard chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Jodi Alama Victoria MN 55386 United Sta 10 26 2011
Kimberly Gehle Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Julie butcher chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Mc Ed Sarawak 94300 Malaysia 10 26 2011
Jason Christensen Chanhasse MN DO NOT Bt United Sta 10 26 2011
Stefano Serpico Rimini 47921 Italy 10 26 2011
Cheryl Bauch Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 26 2011
Erin Karels Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Brook Benson Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
eileen barnes chanhassei MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Patrick Smith Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Jon Maeser Chanhassen 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Heather Christensen Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
SHANNON BURKS CHANHAS MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Amelia Woltjer Nevis MN 56467 United Sta 10 27 2011
Diane Matthews Chaska MN 55318 United Sta 10 27 2011
Neal Klein Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Jeremy Wherley Victoria MN 55386 United Sta 10 27 2011
Cindy Warner Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Kathleen Cancilla Chanhasse MN 55331 United Sta 10 27 2011
Lorinda Hanson Chaska MN 55318 United Sta 10 27 2011
Sonya Benkstein Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
anne Jutting Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Mike Wellner Chanhassel MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Stephen Pawlyshyn Chanhasse MN 55317J United Sta 10 27 2011
Brielle Herbst Shakopee IMN 553791 United Sta 10 27 2011
413
Say No to rezoning Powers Blvd and Park Road in Chanhassen MN
Susan Haun Dorsey Excelsior MN 55331 United Sta 10 27 2011
Jeanna Simonson Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Jenny DeRoo Rockford MN 55373 United Sta 10 27 2011
Jay Donohue Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Kory Barthelemy Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Troy Prinsen Excelsior MN 55331 United Sta 10 27 2011
Laurie Donohue Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Amy Klitzke Lester Prai MN 55354 United Sta 10 27 2011
Ryan Litfin Excelsior MN 55331 United Sta 10 27 2011
Sarah Klein Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Phillip Kuehne Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Brian Smith Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Ashley Smith Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Jennifer Grimm Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Derek Lechner Hopkins MN 55305 United Sta 10 27 2011
Thor Smith Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Matthew Taus Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Dan Piff chanhassei MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Courtney Spekman Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Dave Howe Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Anne Taus Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Danielle Antonovich Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Christina Hamad Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Henry Ohnstad Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Madi Young edinA MN 55439 United Sta 10 27 2011
Debora Ho Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Laura Williams Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Bruce Duncan Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
chris adams Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Valentina Muraleedhara St Peter MN 56082 United Sta 10 27 2011
Patricia Adams Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Rachel Seppman Eden Prairi MN 55346 United Sta 10 27 2011
Rielle Perttu Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Justin Perttu 1000 Lake Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Rianna Perttu Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Jordan Perttu Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Thomas Peterson Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Mike Mehr Eagan MN 55123 United Sta 10 27 2011
Claudine Wildman Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Steve Evangelista Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Kristin Terrell Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Phil Standafer Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Jeff Engebretson Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Elizabeth Gangl Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Edward Laurson Denver CO 80235 USA 10 27 2011
Zane Detert Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Julia Braswell Chaska MN 55318 United Sta 10 27 2011
414
Say No to rezoning Powers Blvd and Park Road in Chanhassen MN
Anne Fisher Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
susan cohoon Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Dick Lloyd Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
margaret adie chanhassei MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Lisa Clausen Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Bonnie gasperlin chanhassei MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Steven Cohoon Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Jeff Zahn Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Spencer Schwartz Excelsior MN 55331 United Sta 10 27 2011
Marissa Schwartz Shorewoo MN 55331 United Sta 10 27 2011
Barbara Brown Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Bruce gasperlin chanhassei MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Shelli Dorfe victoria MN 55386 USA 10 27 2011
Shawn Burk Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Robby Drake Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Luke Jackson Excelsior MN 55331 United Sta 10 27 2011
benjamin dorfe Victoria MN 55386 United Sta 10 27 2011
Eric Kvam Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Patty Bremer Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Alicia Schimke Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Sue Seifert Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Kelly Hastings Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Julie Greenberg Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Kaitlin Bentrup Winona MN 55987 USA 10 27 2011
Nick Hericks Americus GA 31709 United Sta 10 27 2011
Jane Revsbech Chanhasse MN 55331 United Sta 10 27 2011
Andrew Nelson Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
J John and Stacey Bos Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Mark fuchs chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Amy Waters Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Mary Rabai Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Eduardo Perez chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Dr Kevin Burns Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Jessica Meilleur Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 27 2011
Jeffrey Tam Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
elizabeth adams Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
Kathy Gillis Eden Prairi MN 55346 United Sta 10 28 2011
Amy Butterfield Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
Bob Butterfield Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
Ruth Winterer Excelsior MN 55331 United Sta 10 28 2011
Matt Peters Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
Raymond Brozovich Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
Cathy Larson Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
Michelle Tanner St Paul MN 55105 United Sta 10 28 2011
Lea Foli Excelsior IMN 55331 United Sta 10 28 2011
Cindy Yokiel Chanhasse MN 1 553 171 United Sta 10 28 2011
Jason Whims Chanhassel MN I 55317J United Sta 10 28 2011
415
Say No to rezoning Powers Blvd and Park Road in Chanhassen MN
David Wollan Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
Jennifer Westerhaus Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
craig anderson chanhassei MN 55318 United Sta 10 28 2011
Patti Michels Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
Toni Schrupp Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
Stephanie Friant chanhassei MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
John Rock Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
Jessica Miller Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
Lindsay Barthelemy Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
Lisa Katalinich Victoria MN 55386 United Sta 10 28 2011
Ben Newton Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
karlene mikesell chanhassei MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
Stephen Sando Edina MN 55424 United Sta 10 28 2011
Debra Bauler Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
Lena Otolski Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
michael bailey chanhassei MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
Carrie Newton Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
Patti Zimmer Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
Linda Gallaro Chanhasse MN 55317 USA 10 28 2011
Jennifer Syverson Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
Kathryn Goerges minneapol MN 55404 United Sta 10 28 2011
Carol Buesgens Chashassei MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
nancy wright Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
Amy Santella Wayzata MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
David Emerton Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 28 2011
Gerald Cook Chanhasse MN 55318 United Sta 10 28 2011
Lynn Peters Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Don Wallis Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Julie Kolbow Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Dan Revsbech Chanhasse MN 55331 United Sta 10 29 2011
traci peterson Excelsior MN 55331 United Sta 10 29 2011
Mary Ann Walstrom Chanahsse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Caitlin O Connor Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
stephanie fisher Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Joseph O Connor Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Melissa O Connor Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Cynthia Tonn Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Beth Benzie Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Lori Larson Eden Prair MN 55346 United Sta 10 29 2011
Kevin Hippen chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Taylor Larson Eden Prairi MN 55346 United Sta 10 29 2011
Patty Besser Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Mike Boyle Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Nancy Boyle Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Jamie Nelson jThanhassejMN 1 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Pete Sperling lChanhasss I 55317J United Sta 10 29 2011
Meghan O Connor jChanhassejMN I 55317J United Sta 10 29 2011
416
Say No to rezoning Powers Blvd and Park Road in Chanhassen MN
Allen Satter Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Nick Greenwood Eden Prairi MN 55346 United Sta 10 29 2011
alec gibney chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
blanca gibney chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Gail Bach Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Michelle Strain Victoria MN 55386 United Sta 10 29 2011
James Bach Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Craig Blechta Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Joseph Merboth Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Janet McFarland Shorewoo MN 55331 USA 10 29 2011
Debra Denzer Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
meranda ludford Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Deborah Benson Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Anita Bronson Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Kevin Carlson Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
cameron economy Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Bonnie Economy Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Rochelle Curtis Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Kristie Wigger Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 29 2011
Michael Yazvec Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
William Schulte Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Kelly Schulte Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Lori Schmidt Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Linda Boerboom Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Nancy Hoopes Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Eric Gilliland New York NY 10014 USA 10 30 2011
Michael Clausen Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Stacy Sand Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
mike winters Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Len Adler Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Anthony Oberstar Los angele CA 90034 United Sta 10 30 2011
Shannon Brooks Victoria MN 55386 United Sta 10 30 2011
Connie Nuss Chanhassen 55317 Afghanista 10 30 2011
Blake Farland Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Sheryl Danks Hutchinsor MN 55350 United Sta 10 30 2011
Jodie Siems Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Steven Posnick Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Alex Westlind Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Edwin Everett Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Nancy Hanousek Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Rebecca Everett Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Dustin Lang Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Martin Schaeferle Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Dennis Rakocy Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Jacki Kurvers Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Jeffrey Kressler Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Katherine Johnson Chanhassel MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
417
Say No to rezoning Powers Blvd and Park Road in Chanhassen MN
Holly Rakocy Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Pam Kerber Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Linda roslansky Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Michelle Laurent chanhassei MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Jeanne Pietrini Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
frank laengle chanhassei MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
tavis hudson Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Monica Held Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Cindy Robb Victoria MN 55386 United Sta 10 30 2011
David Enright Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 30 2011
Eric Chellen Shorewoo MN 55331 United Sta 10 31 2011
Kristen Ryan Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Sue Adler Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Barb Johnson Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Eric Rain Chaska MN 55318 United Sta 10 31 2011
Nick Bravos Minneton MN 55345 United Sta 10 31 2011
Pamela Strand Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Shirl Stroeing Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
William Hille Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Ben Woolcott Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Lisa Kurvers Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Trish Rinzel Chanhasse MN impact on United Sta 10 31 2011
Markus Fischer chanhassei MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Heidi Garcia Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Kelly Lee Greenwoo MN 55331 United Sta 10 31 2011
Maureen Kvam Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Lauralee Chellen Shorewoo MN 55331 United Sta 10 31 2011
Alissa Abrahamson Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
John Davis Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Deaen Held Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Lee and Jennifer Waldro Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Teri Kocourek chanhassei MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Amir Dabiran Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Shahsa Moghimi Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Lori Thorne Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Amy Severson Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Paymon Vasseghi Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Ozra Amirahmadi Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Tom Cardle Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Ehteram Barghi Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Rob Howard chanhassei MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
kent borgerson chanhassei MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Kristin Kovic Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Grace Tripp Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Becky Borgerson Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Kevin Engebretson Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
jackie ottoson IChanhasselMN 1 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
418
Say No to rezoning Powers Blvd and Park Road in Chanhassen MN
LuAnn Lutgen Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Bill Schubert chanhassei MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Cara Goin Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Nick Goin Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Rhonda Backus Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Paul Ottoson Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Susan Kucera Chahassen MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Rick Fox Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Nikki Fox Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Susie Wuollett Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Marcos Peluso Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Arkhip Osadchuk Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Irina Osadchuk Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
David Weiby Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Sharon McKinney Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Anita Steckling Chaanhass MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Katie Bastiansen MN MN United Sta 10 31 2011
Pam McCartan Excelsior MN 55331 United Sta 10 31 2011
Paula Hallau Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Kathleen Leisman Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Matthew Thomas Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Sarah Thomas Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Heike Hudson Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
nancy clairmont carr Chanhasse MN 55317 912 United Sta 10 31 2011
Nicole Jesse Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Scott Jesse Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Ann Nye Excelsior MN 55331 United Sta 10 31 2011
Daniel Uner Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Orhan Uner Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Pat Uner Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Brenda Vatland Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Keit Osadchuk Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
mark thorne chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Ruth Rogers Fort Collin CO 80528 USA 10 31 2011
patrick lynch chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Patrice Blechta Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 10 31 2011
Dave Schollman chanhassei MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Daniel Lynch Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Chuck Goers Chanhasse MN 55331 United Sta 11 1 2011
Donna Ozuturk Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Ordell Sonja Leines Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Jean Nitchals Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Neil Ellis Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Barry Steckling Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Robb Hall IChanhasselMN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Laura Lehman Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Lance Wegner jChanhassejMN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
419
Say No to rezoning Powers Blvd and Park Road in Chanhassen MN
Lee Leines Victoria MN 55386 United Sta 11 1 2011
Vicki Taborek Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Holly Stang Williams Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Philip Williams Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Thomas Newhouse Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
George Webster Chaska MN 55318 United Sta 11 1 2011
Peter Boevers Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Kathy Luce Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Jodi Rivera Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Wendy Evenson Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Sue Bogan Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Joe Oprosko Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Christoph Leser Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Jason Lehman Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
James Hastreiter Chanhaser MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Roger Rood Victoria MN 55386 United Sta 11 1 2011
Audra Mollet Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Dan Berg Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Brian BAker Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Leslie Baker Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Colleen Cannon Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Paul Johnson Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Amy Diedrich Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Sarah Petersen Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Mike Petersen Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Patricia Hastreiter 5317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Mark Glodoski Chanhasse MN 55331 United Sta 11 1 2011
Virginia Bailey Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Lisa Keenan Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Jeff grover Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
mike Grebin CHANHAS MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
michael boyer chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
cheryl niebeling chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Jerry Parten Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Jamie Cook Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Jim Van Asten Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Shirley Humphrey Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Brian leines Victoria MN 55386 United Sta 11 1 2011
Rita Klauda Chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Martha Noll chanhasse MN 55317 United Sta 11 1 2011
Jeff Cook Chanhasse MN 55317J United Sta 11 1 2011
420
Correspondence Packet
Letter from Sarah Caruso of the United Way dated November 11 2011
Letter from Bill Jensen of Mediacom dated November 14 2011
Memo from Greg Sticha Finance Director re Review of Claims Paid dated November 17 2011
421
Ale 4J S ton 4
November 11 2011
Todd Gerhardt
City of Chanhassen
P O Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Dear Todd
RECEIVED
NO V 1 6 2011
CITY OF CH N84SSe1V
Every one counts Thanks for letting us count on you to help build a stronger community
Your support creates the building blocks for a good life basic needs education and health
Thanks to you City of Chanhassen is part of the movement to LIVE UNITED joining thousands of
other companies in our community committed to creating a better life for us all With your help we are
Raising an additional 17 6 million pounds of food for the emergency food shelf system
Providing quality out of school programs for more than 32 300 youth
Helping 109 000 older adults and those with disabilities maximize their independence so they can
continue living in their homes
You can be proud of what City of Chanhassen has done for this community It s only with your support that United Way can continue to unite caring people to build pathways out of poverty creating
opportunity for all
Thank you for joining the movement to LIVE UNITED
Sincerely
A 2o
Sarah Caruso
President and Chief Executive Officer
This letter is not a receipt It is your confirmation for your tax deductible pledge that will support health and human services in 2012 United
Way acknowledges no commercial goods or services were provided in exchange for your contribution 68130
www unitedwaytwincities org 422
Meyl 44 2 e 4161 C
M ediacom
November 14 2011
Dear Chanhassen Community Official
Bill Jensen
Regional Vice President
RECEIVED
NOV 1 5 2011
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
The purpose of this letter is to inform you of upcoming rate changes to be implemented on or about December 15 2011 as follows
Product Old Rate New Rate Net Change
Broadcast Basic 27 95 29 95 2 00
Family Cable 65 95 68 95 3 00
Family Cable with
Digital 1 Star
79 40 79 95 0 55
Cinemax 10 95 12 95 2 00
Showtime 10 95 12 95 2 00
Digital Plus 12 00 14 00 2 00
Wireless Home
Networking
2 95 3 95 1 00
Paperless Bill Credit 1 00
Bill Credit
Eliminated Credit No Longer
Available
The decision to make price adjustments is always a difficult one As our Nation struggles to
pull itself out of what has been called the Great Recession we recognize these are challenging
times for the hardworking men and women living in the communities we serve While
Mediacom strives to keep expenses in check there are some costs that are out of our direct
control Programming expenses particularly with respect to broadcast television channels and
live sports content are escalating at a pace well in excess of inflation
The fees we pay to retransmit local broadcast stations like ABC CBS FOX and NBC are by
far our fastest growing programming cost component Outdated federal laws give the local
broadcast stations monopoly power over network and syndicated programming within their
respective market areas Over the past few years many broadcasters have used their monopoly
powers to demand 100 200 and even 300 rate increases during contract negotiations
This has driven up cable and satellite rates and forced American consumers to pay billions of
dollars for free over the air television
1 Customers currently on promotional rates will not receive this rate change until the expiration of their respective
promotional period
Mediacom Communications Corporation
1504 2 nd Street SE Waseca Minnesota 56093
Telephone 507 835 2356 Fax 507 835 4567
E mail bjensen @mediacomcc com
423
The problems related to sports programming are equally as alarming One look at the
skyrocketing rights fees announced with recent deals and it is easy to see the marketplace for
live televised sports is overpriced and out of control For example FOX and Telemundo
bought the rights to broadcast the 2018 and 2022 World Cup in the U S for 1 billion
Comcast NBC Universal agreed to pay 4 38 billion to televise four Olympic Games through
2020 ESPN renewed its rights deal with the NFL for Monday Night Football agreeing to pay
over 15 billion for eight years or 70 more than it currently pays These are just few
examples of the unrestrained spending that has become the hallmark of the sports programming
business
Contrary to public perception cable companies like Mediacom are reluctant to raise video
prices because when we do we lose customers Mediacom does not make more money when
we raise video rates since we remit virtually every penny of the increase on to the
programmers In fact over the last three years our programming cost increases were more
than double our video revenue increases
Since the programming community has been unwilling to exercise even the slightest measure of self restraint when it comes to reigning in their spending or increasing their price demands
Mediacom has taken the fight to Washington We have asked the Federal Communications
Commission FCC and Members of Congress to protect senior citizens low income
households and rural residents from practices that are rendering subscription television
unaffordable for more and more Americans We invite the leaders of your community to do
the same
Despite the business challenges in our industry Mediacom appreciates the opportunity to
continue to serve your community s telecommunications needs If you have any questions
please contact me directly at 507 835 2356 or bjensen@mediacomcc com
Sincerely
i
424
0
CITY OF
CHANgASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
7901 Park Place
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
MEMORANDUM
TO Mayor
City Council
FROM Greg Sticha Finance Director
DATE November 17 2011 66
SUBJECT Review of Claims Paid
The following claims are submitted for review on November 28 2011
Check Numbers Amounts
150836 150974 561 998 43
Total All Claims 561 998 43
Attachments Check Summary
Check Detail Report
Chanhassen is a Community for Life Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 425
Accounts Payable
Checks by Date Summary By Check Number
User dwashburn
Printed 11 17 2011 10 04 AM
I
D M E I
Check Number Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount
150836 2NDWIN 2ND WIND EXERCISE EQUIPri 11 10 2011 0 00 121 50
150837 AIELE A 1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 11 10 2011 0 00 433 62
150838 aarp AARP 11 10 2011 0 00 116 00
150839 ANCTEC ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 11 10 2011 0 00 2 250 00
150840 blacon Blackstone Contractors LLC 11 10 2011 0 00 3 380 20
150841 braint BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORA 11 10 2011 0 00 986 75
150842 CAMKNU CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11 10 2011 0 00 16 294 44
150843 carcou Carver County 11 10 2011 0 00 38 10
150844 carcou Carver County 11 10 2011 0 00 110 322 00
150845 CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MM 11 10 2011 0 00 1 095 62
150846 EmbMinn CENTURYLINK 11 10 2011 0 00 68 82
150847 CHAVET CHANHASSEN VETERINARY 11 10 2011 0 00 178 98
150848 citslp City of St Louis Park 11 10 2011 0 00 169 00
150849 COMASP Commercial Asphalt Cc 11 10 2011 0 00 1 686 02
150850 ConCau Contract Caulking Inc 11 10 2011 0 00 890 00
150851 COMMA COPY IMAGES INC 11 10 2011 0 00 466 00
150852 cpsol CP Solutions Inc 11 10 2011 0 00 994 60
150853 CUBFOO CUB FOODS 11 10 2011 0 00 405 32
150854 CUSPOO CUSTOM POOLS 11 10 2011 0 00 500 00
150855 DENCUS DENALI CUSTOM HOMES INC 11 10 2011 0 00 500 00
150856 DONSAL Donald Salverda Associates 11 10 2011 0 00 154 75
150857 EDGBUI EDGEWORK BUILDERS INC 11 10 2011 0 00 500 00
150858 ElmeTom Tom Elmer 11 10 2011 0 00 147 92
150859 FehCom Fehn Companies 11 10 2011 0 00 189 92
150860 FLOTOT FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 11 10 2011 0 00 133 53
150861 GENPAR GENERAL PARTS INC 11 10 2011 0 00 308 70
150862 GOOTEC GOODPOINTE TECHNOLOGY 11 10 2011 0 00 4 200 00
150863 hjele H J Electric LLC 11 10 2011 0 00 5 252 33
150864 HaasCaly Calvin Haasken 11 10 2011 0 00 510 00
150865 HanSan Hansons Sandblasting LLC 11 10 2011 0 00 270 00
150866 HAWCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL 11 10 2011 0 00 40 00
150867 HDsup HD Supply Waterworks LTD 11 10 2011 0 00 1 341 62
150868 HileKim Kim Hile 11 10 2011 0 00 48 00
150869 HisInf Historical Information Gatherers 11 10 2011 0 00 210 00
150870 INDLAN Indoor Landscapes Inc 11 10 2011 0 00 199 86
150871 JHLAR JH LARSON COMPANY 11 10 2011 0 00 535 91
150872 JohnCaro Carole Johnson 11 10 2011 0 00 34 99
150873 JOHSUP JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 11 10 2011 0 00 211 87
150874 kimhor KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIA 11 10 2011 0 00 11 716 99
150875 KINDDEBR DEBRA KIND 11 10 2011 0 00 337 50
150876 K1evJon Jon Klever 11 10 2011 0 00 25 00
150877 KoniMino Konica Minolta Business Solution 11 10 2011 0 00 1 107 45
150878 lanend LANDS END CORPORATE SAL 11 10 2011 0 00 435 76
150879 LEAMIN LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITI 11 10 2011 0 00 915 00
150880 MargRich Richard E Marquette 11 10 2011 0 00 541 41
AP Checks by Date Summary By Check Number 11 17 2011 10 04 AM Page 1
426
Check Number Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount
150881 MERACE MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 11 10 2011 0 00 546 83
150882 metfir METRO FIRE 11 10 2011 0 00 112 93
150883 METROC METROCALL 11 10 2011 0 00 4 87
150884 METCO2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 11 10 2011 0 00 126 667 01
150885 metco Metropolitan Council Env Svcs 11 10 2011 0 00 15 453 90
150886 MinnVall Minnesota Valley Testing Laborat 11 10 2011 0 00 315 00
150887 minupre Minuteman Press 11 10 2011 0 00 603 42
150888 mnlabo MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INE 11 10 2011 0 00 3 038 04
150889 mooslloy Lloyd J Moosbrugger 11 10 2011 0 00 772 22
150890 MTIDIS MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 11 10 2011 0 00 1 934 89
150891 nagapp NAGELL APPRAISAL CONSI 11 10 2011 0 00 3 650 00
150892 pjpro P J Promotions 11 10 2011 0 00 58 50
150893 qualcon Quality Control Integration Inc 11 10 2011 0 00 1 500 00
150894 quill QUILL CORPORATION 11 10 2011 0 00 77 98
150895 RBMSER RBM SERVICES INC 11 10 2011 0 00 5 351 89
150896 RelOff Reliable Office Supplies 11 10 2011 0 00 231 70
150897 SHEWIL SHERWIN WILLIAMS 11 10 2011 0 00 390 97
150898 SHOTRU SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 11 10 2011 0 00 3 52
150899 SofHou SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNA7 11 10 2011 0 00 4 873 50
150900 speenv Specialized Environmental Technc 11 10 2011 0 00 154 88
150901 SPSCOM SPS COMPANIES INC 11 10 2011 0 00 16 27
150902 STREIC STREICHER S 11 10 2011 0 00 571 68
150903 tecusa Technogym USA Corp 11 10 2011 0 00 219 22
150904 Travel Travelers 11 10 2011 0 00 1 000 00
150905 TWISEE TWIN CITY SEED CO 11 10 2011 0 00 304 59
150906 VIKIND VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 11 10 2011 0 00 473 95
150907 WatCon Water Conservation Services Inc 11 10 2011 0 00 461 20
150908 WMMUE WM MUELLER SONS INC 11 10 2011 0 00 10 851 58
150909 WSDAR WS DARLEY CO 11 10 2011 0 00 24 43
150910 wsb WSB ASSOCIATES INC 11 10 2011 0 00 14 767 00
150913 3DSPE 3D SPECIALTIES 11 17 2011 0 00 109 28
150914 AARP AARP 11 17 2011 0 00 114 00
150915 AARP AARP 11 17 2011 0 00 82 00
150916 Augcol Augsburg College 11 17 2011 0 00 125 00
150917 MillBeth Bethany Ayers 11 17 2011 0 00 70 17
150918 BAUBUI Bauer Built Inc 11 17 2011 0 00 46 01
150919 BaytGlor Gloria Bayton 11 17 2011 0 00 14 00
150920 BROTRA BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS 11 17 2011 0 00 307 80
150921 CarTur Carburetion and Turbo Systems h 11 17 2011 0 00 75 00
150922 CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINI 11 17 2011 0 00 342 58
150923 ChaRes Chan Residential Development Pa 11 17 2011 0 00 61 413 25
150924 Choice Choice Inc 11 17 2011 0 00 127 36
150925 CLITHE CLIMB THEATRE INC 11 17 2011 0 00 2 472 00
150926 CommBank Community Bank Corp 11 17 2011 0 00 1 500 00
150927 ComHea Community Health Charities MN 11 17 2011 0 00 16 25
150928 COMINT COMPUTER INTEGRATION TE 11 17 2011 0 00 119 85
150929 CRABTR CRABTREE COMPANIES INC 11 17 2011 0 00 5 033 73
150930 DelDen Delta Dental 11 17 2011 0 00 1 556 35
150931 EHLERS EHLERS ASSOCIATES INC 11 17 2011 0 00 9 262 50
150932 FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CON 11 17 2011 0 00 13 26
150933 FIRLAB FIRSTLAB 11 17 2011 0 00 79 90
150934 GraTra Graffic Traffic LLC 11 17 2011 0 00 3 232 97
150935 HanSan Hansons Sandblasting LLC 11 17 2011 0 00 390 00
150936 HARCRE HARDWOOD CREEK LUMBER 11 17 2011 0 00 259 17
150937 HARTRE HARTMAN TREE FARM 11 17 2011 0 00 2 340 00
AP Checks by Date Summary By Check Number 11 17 2011 10 04 AM Page 2
427
Check Number Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount
150938 HooThr Hoops Threads 11 17 2011 0 00 628 00
150939 ICMART ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRU 11 17 2011 0 00 2 082 50
150940 JJKel J J Keller Associates Inc 11 17 2011 0 00 400 93
150941 JEFFIR JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 11 17 2011 0 00 15 711 76
150942 LocLak Local Lakes Construction 11 17 2011 0 00 214 34
150943 MNCHIL MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN 11 17 2011 0 00 653 42
150944 MNTRAN MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATI 11 17 2011 0 00 269 95
150945 MooInd Moonlight Industries LLC 11 17 2011 0 00 200 00
150946 MOSBAR MOSS BARNETT 11 17 2011 0 00 8 391 04
150947 MTIDIS MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 11 17 2011 0 00 167 14
150948 NATRET Nationwide Retirement Solutions 11 17 2011 0 00 4 561 72
150949 NATRET Nationwide Retirement Solutions 11 17 2011 0 00 476 28
150950 NortHome Norton Homes 11 17 2011 0 00 1 500 00
150951 OREAUT O Reilly Automotive Inc 11 17 2011 0 00 442 75
150952 OlseChad Chad Olsen 11 17 2011 0 00 20 71
150953 PioEng Pioneer Engineering P A 11 17 2011 0 00 500 00
150954 pipser Pipe Services Corporation 11 17 2011 0 00 11 592 59
150955 PraPar Prairie Party Rental LLC 11 17 2011 0 00 199 80
150956 PULHOM PULTE HOMES 11 17 2011 0 00 42 750 00
150957 RICBUS RICHFIELD BUS COMPANY 11 17 2011 0 00 433 75
150958 rylhom Ryland Homes 11 17 2011 0 00 3 000 00
150959 TJPai Terry Joseph Shanahan 11 17 2011 0 00 894 00
150960 SponGlor Gloria Spong 11 17 2011 0 00 32 00
150961 StutJohn John Stutzman 11 17 2011 0 00 200 00
150962 supwir Superior Wireless Communication 11 17 2011 0 00 85 15
150963 TaiOn Tailors On 79th 11 17 2011 0 00 395 44
150964 TENNAN TENNANT 11 17 2011 0 00 249 34
150965 ThoMue Thomas Mueller Construction 11 17 2011 0 00 250 00
150966 UNIWAY UNITED WAY 11 17 2011 0 00 46 23
150967 UNIMIN UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 11 17 2011 0 00 5 765 00
150968 UNIMIN UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 11 17 2011 0 00 4 228 00
150969 VIKAUT VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKI 11 17 2011 0 00 560 00
150970 WILNUR WILSON S NURSERY INC 11 17 2011 0 00 299 25
150971 WINGRICH RICHARD WING 11 17 2011 0 00 73 33
150972 WMMUE WM MUELLER SONS INC 11 17 2011 0 00 326 44
150973 WSDAR WS DARLEY CO 11 17 2011 0 00 272 69
150974 WSB WSB ASSOCIATES INC 11 17 2011 0 00 325 00
Report Total 0 00 561 998 43
AP Checks by Date Summary By Check Number 11 17 2011 10 04 AM Page 3
428
Accounts Payable
Check Detail
User dwashburn
Printed 11 17 2011 10 06AM
Check Number Check Date
2NDWIN 2ND WIND EXERCISE EQUIPMENT Line Item Account
150836 11 10 2011
Inv 21 031479
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 03 2011 Labor charge 101 15304530 121 50
Inv 21 031479 Total 121 50
150836 Total 121 50
2NDWIN 2ND WIND EXERCISE EQUIPMENT Total 121 50
3DSPE 3D SPECIALTIES Line Item Account
150913 11 17 2011
Inv 437748
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 09 2011 Safety glasses 101 1320 4120 109 28
Inv 437748 Total 109 28
150913 Total 109 28
3DSPE 3D SPECIALTIES Total 109 28
AI ELE A 1 ELECTRIC SERVICE Line Item Account
150837 11 10 2011
Inv 16373
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 30 2011 Repair outside lights install receptacle welder 700 0000 4510 433 62
Inv 16373 Total 433 62
150837 Total 433 62
AIELE A 1 ELECTRIC SERVICE Total 433 62
aarp AARP Line Item Account
150838 11 10 2011
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 1
429
Check Number Check Date Amount
Inv 11092011
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 09 2011 Defensive Driving 101 1560 4300 116 00
Inv 11092011 Total 116 00
150838 Total 116 00
150914 11 17 2011
Inv 111611
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 16 2011 Defensive Driving 11 15 11 21 11 101 1560 4300 114 00
Inv 111611 Total 114 00
150914 Total 114 00
150915 11 17 2011
Inv 111611
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 16 2011 Defensive Driving 11 16 11 101 1560 4300 82 00
Inv 111611 Total 82 00
150915 Total 82 00
AARP AARP Total 312 00
ANCTEC ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER Line Item Account
150839 11 10 2011
Inv 25808
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 27 2011 Repair service advantage 101 1220 4531 2 250 00
Inv 25808 Total 2 250 00
150839 Total 2 250 00
ANCTEC ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER Total 2 250 00
Augcol Augsburg College Line Item Account
150916 11 17 2011
Inv 111611
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 16 2011 2012 All That What s Going on Up There 101 1560 4300 125 00
Inv 111611 Total 125 00
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 2
430
Check Number Check Date Amount
150916 Total
Augcol Augsburg College Total
MillBeth Ayers Bethany Line Item Account
150917 11 17 2011
Inv 111511
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 15 2011 Office Max Easel Pads markers
Inv 111511 Total
150917 Total
MillBeth Ayers Bethany Total
BAUBUI Bauer Built Inc Line Item Account
150918 11 17 2011
Inv 180044882
Line Item Date Line Item Description
09 10 2011 CR Destinam Le Owl 1095
Inv 180044882 Total
Inv 180051212
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 02 2011 O Ring
Inv 180051212 Total
Inv 180051375
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 03 2011 E Transforce At BW
Inv 180051375 Total
150918 Total
Line Item Account
101 1220 4290
Line Item Account
101 1250 4140
Line Item Account
101 1320 4120
Line Item Account
101 1550 4140
125 00
125 00
70 17
70 17
70 17
70 17
469 99
469 99
42 22
42 22
473 78
473 78
46 01
BAUBUI Bauer Built Inc Total 46 01
BaytGlor Bayton Gloria Line Item Account
150919 11 17 2011
Inv 111411
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Refund Christmas Sr Ctr Party 101 1560 3637 14 00
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 3
431
Check Number Check Date Amount
Inv 111411 Total 14 00
150919 Total
BaytGlor Bayton Gloria Total
blacon Blackstone Contractors LLC Line Item Account
150840 11 10 2011
Inv 3
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 31 2011 10 Hill Street 720 7025 4751
Inv 3 Total
150840 Total
blacon Blackstone Contractors LLC Total
braint BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Line Item Account
150841 11 10 2011
Inv 342655
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 21 2011 Minnewashta Creek Hill Drive Pavement Evaluation 400 0000 1155
Inv 342655 Total
150841 Total
braint BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Total
BROTRA BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS Line Item Account
150920 11 17 2011
Inv 30093
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 01 2011 USA LED 12 RED XL 101 1350 4565
Inv 30093 Total
150920 Total
BROTRA BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS Total
CAMKNU CAMPBELL KNUTSON Line Item Account
150842 11 10 2011
Inv 103111
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
14 00
14 00
3 380 20
3 380 20
3 380 20
3 380 20
986 75
986 75
986 75
986 75
307 80
307 80
307 80
307 80
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 4
432
Check Number Check Date Amount
10 31 2011 Oct 2011 Legal Services 101 1140 4302 16 294 44
Inv 103111 Total 16 294 44
150842 Total
CAMKNU CAMPBELL KNUTSON Total
CarT ur Carburetion and Turbo Systems Inc Line Item Account
150921 11 17 2011
Inv 117794
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 04 2011 Labor emission ck on Nissan forklift
Inv 117794 Total
150921 Total
CarTWr Carburetion and Turbo Systems Inc Total
carcou Carver County Line Item Account
150843 11 10 2011
Inv 861
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 26 2011 HID lamps Fluorescent lamps
Inv 861 Total
Inv 870
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 03 2011 downtown yard waste
Inv 870 Total
150843 Total
150844 11 10 2011
Inv 48038
Line Item Date Line Item Description
09 15 2011 2011 Assessment Contract
Inv 48038 Total
150844 Total
Line Item Account
101 1320 4530
Line Item Account
101 1550 4350
Line Item Account
720 7202 4320
Line Item Account
101 1150 4300
16 294 44
16 294 44
75 00
75 00
75 00
75 00
30 10
30 10
8 00
8 00
38 10
110 322 00
110 322 00
110 322 00
carcou Carver County Total 110 360 10
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 5
433
Check Number Check Date
Line Item Description
Amount
CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO Line Item Account
10 31 2011 October 2011 Charges
150845 11 10 2011
188 95
10 31 2011
Inv 102811
700 0000 4320 23 62
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
701 0000 4320
10 28 2011 October 2011 Charges 101 1550 4320 19 24
10 28 2011 October 2011 Charges 700 0000 4320 13 49
10 28 2011 October 2011 Charges 101 1190 4320 474 58
10 28 2011 October 2011 Charges 700 7019 4320 121 19
10 28 2011 October 2011 Charges 101 1170 4320 212 16
Inv 102811 Total
13 39
840 66
Inv 103111
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
1 438 20
10 31 2011 October 2011 Charges 101 1370 4320 188 95
10 31 2011 October 2011 Charges 700 0000 4320 23 62
10 31 2011 October 2011 Charges 701 0000 4320 23 62
10 31 2011 October 2011 Charges 701 0000 4320 18 77
Inv 103111 Total 254 96
150845 Total 1 095 62
150922 11 17 2011
CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO Total 1 438 20
Inv 103111
150846 11 10 2011
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
Line Item Account
10 31 2011 Oct 2011 Charges 101 1220 4320 167 48
10 31 2011 Oct 2011 Charges 101 1530 4320 23 76
10 31 2011 Oct 2011 Charges 101 1551 4320 17 46
10 31 2011 Oct 2011 Charges 101 1370 4320 107 10
10 31 2011 Oct 2011 Charges 700 0000 4320 13 39
10 31 2011 Oct 2011 Charges 701 0000 4320 13 39
Inv 103111 Total 342 58
150922 Total 342 58
CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO Total 1 438 20
EmbMinn CENTURYLINK Line Item Account
150846 11 10 2011
Inv 110111
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 01 2011 Nov 2011 charges 700 0000 4310 34 41
11 01 2011 Nov 2011 charges 701 0000 4310 34 41
Inv 110111 Total 68 82
150846 Total 68 82
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 6
434
Check Number Check Date Amount
EmbMinn CENTURYLINK Total
ChaRes Chan Residential Development Partners Line Item Account
150923 11 17 2011
Inv 111411
Line Item Date Line Item Descrintion
11 14 2011 Security Escrow Preserve @ Bluff Crk 3rd Add
Inv 111411 Total
150923 Total
ChaRes Chan Residential Development Partners Total
CHAVET CHANHASSEN VETERINARY Line Item Account
150847 11 10 2011
Inv 176761
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 01 2011 Impound dog
Inv 176761 Total
150847 Total
CHAVET CHANHASSEN VETERINARY Total
Choice Choice Inc Line Item Account 101 12204350
150924 11 17 2011
Inv 102811
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 28 2011 09 19 11 10 14 11 Fire Station
Inv 102811 Total
150924 Total
Choice Choice Inc Total
citslp City of St Louis Park Line Item Account
150848 11 10 2011
Inv 21617
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 07 2011 communications boot camp seminar
Inv 21617 Total
Line Item Account
815 8221 2024
Line Item Account
101 1260 4300
Line Item Account
101 1220 4350
Line Item Account
101 1210 4370
68 82
61 413 25
61 413 25
61 413 25
61 413 25
178 98
178 98
178 98
178 98
127 36
127 36
127 36
127 36
169 00
169 00
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 7
435
Check Number Check Date Amount
150848 Total 169 00
citslp City of St Louis Park Total 169 00
CLITHE CLIMB THEATRE INC Line Item Account
150925 11 17 2011
Inv 111611
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 16 2011 Contract 45446 720 7202 4300 2 472 00
Inv 111611 Total 2 472 00
150925 Total 2 472 00
CLITHE CLIMB THEATRE INC Total 2 472 00
COMASP Commercial Asphalt Co Line Item Account
150849 11 10 2011
Inv 103111
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 31 2011 42A B Wear 42B 32B Non Wear 700 0000 4552 1 372 27
10 31 2011 42A B Wear 4213 3213 Non Wear 420 0000 4751 313 75
Inv 103111 Total 1 686 02
150849 Total 1 686 02
COMASP Commercial Asphalt Co Total 1 686 02
CommBank Community Bank Corp Line Item Account
150926 11 17 2011
Inv 111411
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Erosion 7030 Highover Dr 815 8202 2024 1 500 00
Inv 111411 Total 1 500 00
150926 Total 1 500 00
CommBank Community Bank Corp Total 1 500 00
ComHea Community Health Charities MN Line Item Account
150927 11 17 2011
Inv
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 15 2011 PR Batch 00405 11 2011 Community Health Charities MN 101 0000 2006 16 25
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 8
436
Check Number Check Date Amount
Inv Total
150927 Total
ComHea Community Health Charities MN Total
COMINT COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN Line Item Account
150928 11 17 2011
Inv IS210775
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 31 2011 Website FTP Site hosting Urchin web stats stor
Inv IS210775 Total
150928 Total
COMINT COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN Total
ConCau Contract Caulking Inc Line Item Account
150850 11 10 2011
Inv B1086
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 27 2011 Lk Ann Stairway caulking
Inv B 1086 Total
150850 Total
ConCau Contract Caulking Inc Total
COPIMA COPY IMAGES INC Line Item Account
150851 11 10 2011
Inv 132722
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 03 2011 Konica 7040
Inv 132722 Total
150851 Total
COPIMA COPY IMAGES INC Total
cpsol CP Solutions Inc Line Item Account
150852 11 10 2011
Line Item Account
101 1160 4320
Line Item Account
101 1550 4300
Line Item Account
101 1250 4530
16 25
16 25
16 25
119 85
119 85
119 85
119 85
890 00
890 00
890 00
890 00
466 00
466 00
466 00
466 00
AP Check Detail I1 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 9
437
Check Number Check Date Amount
Inv 2011 M20 1
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 27 2011 CPSI Cathodi Clamp 700 0000 4552 994 60
Inv 2011 M20 1 Total 994 60
150852 Total 994 60
cpsol CP Solutions Inc Total 994 60
CRABTR CRABTREE COMPANIES INC Line Item Account
150929 11 17 2011
Inv 105009
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Canon DR7090C Color Scanner 400 4124 4703 5 033 73
Inv 105009 Total 5 033 73
150929 Total 5 033 73
CRABTR CRABTREE COMPANIES INC Total 5 033 73
CUBFOO CUB FOODS Line Item Account
150853 11 10 2011
Inv 091011
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
09 10 2011 Cleaning Supplies Gatorade Water 101 1220 4290 76 19
Inv 091011 Total 76 19
Inv 100311
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 03 2011 Food for 10 03 Bus Mtg 101 1220 4370 192 66
Inv 100311 Total 192 66
Inv 101411
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 14 2011 Water 101 1220 4290 69 80
Inv 101411 Total 69 80
Inv 101611
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 16 2011 Cookies for Open House 101 1220 4375 29 95
10 16 2011 Cleaning Jam Cream 101 1220 4375 36 72
Inv 101611 Total 66 67
AP Check Detail I1 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 10
438
Check Number Check Date Amount
150853 Total
CUBFOO CUB FOODS Total
CUSPOO CUSTOM POOLS Line Item Account
150854 11 10 2011
Inv 110411
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 04 2011 Erosion Escrow 1805 Emerald Ln
Inv 110411 Total
150854 Total
CUSPOO CUSTOM POOLS Total
DelDen Delta Dental Line Item Account
150930 11 17 2011
Inv 4730427
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 15 2011 Dec 2011 Charges
11 15 2011 Dec 2011 Charges
11 15 2011 Dec 2011 Charges
11 15 2011 Dec 2011 Charges
Inv 4730427 Total
150930 Total
De1Den Delta Dental Total
DENCUS DENALI CUSTOM HOMES INC Line Item Account
150855 11 10 2011
Inv 110411
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 04 2011 Erosion Escrow 1805 Emerald Ln
Inv 110411 Total
150855 Total
DENCUS DENALI CUSTOM HOMES INC Total
DONSAL Donald Salverda Associates Line Item Account
150856 11 10 2011
Line Item Account
815 8202 2024
Line Item Account
101 0000 2013
700 0000 2013
701 0000 2013
720 0000 2013
Line Item Account
815 8202 2024
405 32
405 32
500 00
500 00
500 00
500 00
1 237 82
133 27
133 27
51 99
1 556 35
1 556 35
1 556 35
500 00
500 00
500 00
500 00
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 11
439
Check Number Check Date Amount
Inv P 1103 3C
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 03 2011 Sessions 4 6 July Nov 101 1120 4370 86 41
Inv P 1103 3C Total 86 41
Inv P 1107 2C
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 03 2011 Sessions 4 6 July Nov 101 1420 4370 68 34
Inv P 1107 2C Total 68 34
150856 Total 154 75
DONSAL Donald Salverda Associates Total 154 75
EDGBUI EDGEWORK BUILDERS INC Line Item Account
150857 11 10 2011
Inv 110411
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 04 2011 Erosion Escrow 6690 Brenden Ct 815 8202 2024 500 00
Inv 110411 Total 500 00
150857 Total 500 00
EDGBUI EDGEWORK BUILDERS INC Total 500 00
EHLERS EHLERS ASSOCIATES INC Line Item Account
150931 11 17 2011
Inv 343670
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 09 2011 Utility rate study 700 0000 4300 3 087 50
11 09 2011 Utility rate study 701 0000 4300 3 087 50
11 09 2011 Utility rate study 720 0000 4300 3 087 50
Inv 343670 Total 9 262 50
150931 Total 9 262 50
EHLERS EHLERS ASSOCIATES INC Total 9 262 50
ElmeTom Elmer Tom Line Item Account
150858 11 10 2011
Inv 71381
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
08 24 2011 irrigation repair due to construction 601 6025 4300 147 92
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 12
440
Check Number Check Date Amount
Inv 71381 Total 147 92
150858 Total
ElmeTom Elmer Tom Total
FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Line Item Account
150932 11 17 2011
Inv 1 3756908
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 28 2011 CR Battery Core
Inv 1 3756908 Total
Inv 1 3761808
Line Item Date Line Item Descrintion
11 04 2011 Battery Core
Inv 1 3761808 Total
150932 Total
FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Total
FehCom Fehn Companies Line Item Account
150859 11 10 2011
Inv 11092011
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 09 2011 refund wetland buffer sign posts
Inv 11092011 Total
150859 Total
FehCom Fehn Companies Total
FIRLAB FIRSTLAB Line Item Account
150933 11 17 2011
Inv 468896
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 08 2011 DOT Drug Screen Random
11 08 2011 DOT Drug Screen Random
Inv 468896 Total
150933 Total
Line Item Account
101 1320 4120
Line Item Account
101 1250 4140
Line Item Account
101 1320 3903
Line Item Account
700 0000 4300
101 1320 4300
147 92
147 92
51 30
51 30
64 56
64 56
13 26
13 26
189 92
189 92
189 92
189 92
39 95
39 95
79 90
79 90
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 13
441
Check Number Check Date Amount
FIRLAB FIRSTLAB Total
FLOTOT FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY Line Item Account
150860 11 10 2011
Inv 258709
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 31 2011 Rekey 2 cylinders issue 5 keys
Inv 258709 Total
150860 Total
FLOTOT FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY Total
GENPAR GENERAL PARTS INC Line Item Account
150861 11 10 2011
Inv 5342514
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 26 2011 Repair dishmachine
Inv 5342514 Total
150861 Total
GENPAR GENERAL PARTS INC Total
GOOTEC GOODPOINTE TECHNOLOGY INC Line Item Account
150862 11 10 2011
Inv 2050
Line Item Date Line Item Description
09 07 2011 2011 Parking Lot Evaluation Project
Inv 2050 Total
150862 Total
GOOTEC GOODPOINTE TECHNOLOGY INC Total
GraTra Graffic Traffic LLC Line Item Account
150934 11 17 2011
Inv 33164
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 21 2011 Vehicle graphic for Chan Fire
Inv 33164 Total
Line Item Account
101 1370 4510
Line Item Account
101 1170 4530
Line Item Account
420 0000 4751
Line Item Account
101 1220 4520
79 90
133 53
133 53
133 53
133 53
308 70
308 70
308 70
308 70
4 200 00
4 200 00
4 200 00
4 200 00
3 232 97
3 232 97
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 14
442
Check Number Check Date Amount
150934 Total 3 232 97
GraTra Graffic Traffic LLC Total
hjele H J Electric LLC Line Item Account
150863 11 10 2011
Inv 1156
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 06 2011 electrical work 500 W 76th Street
Inv 1156 Total
Inv 1157
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 06 2011 electrical repair on broken conduit
Inv 1157 Total
150863 Total
hjele H J Electric LLC Total
HaasCaly Haasken Calvin Line Item Account
150864 11 10 2011
Inv 101311
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 13 2011 Chan vs Degler 10 CV 08 426
Inv 101311 Total
150864 Total
HaasCaly Haasken Calvin Total
HanSan Hansons Sandblasting LLC Line Item Account
150865 11 10 2011
Inv 3849
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 05 2011 Parts sandblasted
Inv 3849 Total
150865 Total
150935 11 17 2011
Line Item Account
700 00004510
Line Item Account
700 00004552
Line Item Account
603 6301 4300
Line Item Account
101 13204530
3 232 97
4 065 79
4 065 79
1 186 54
1 186 54
5 252 33
5 252 33
510 00
510 00
510 00
510 00
270 00
270 00
270 00
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 15
443
Check Number Check Date Amount
Inv 7486
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 02 2011 Green plow and parts 101 1320 4530 390 00
Inv 7486 Total 390 00
150935 Total 390 00
HanSan Hanson Sandblasting LLC Total 660 00
HARCRE HARDWOOD CREEK LUMBER INC Line Item Account
150936 11 17 2011
Inv 8805
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 10 2011 48 pine lath 101 1550 4150 259 17
Inv 8805 Total 259 17
150936 Total 259 17
HARCRE HARDWOOD CREEK LUMBER INC Total 259 17
HARTRE HARTMAN TREE FARM Line Item Account
150937 11 17 2011
Inv 1495
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 07 2011 Park Ride facility near Chan Dinner Theater 491 4301 4701 1 440 00
Inv 1495 Total 1 440 00
Inv 1496
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 07 2011 Lk Susan City Hall 410 0000 4701 900 00
Inv 1496 Total 900 00
150937 Total 2 340 00
HARTRE HARTMAN TREE FARM Total 2 340 00
HAWCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL Line Item Account
150866 11 10 2011
Inv 3276522 RI
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 28 2011 Chlorine Cylinder 700 7019 4160 40 00
Inv 3276522 RI Total 40 00
AP Check Detail I1 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 16
444
Check Number Check Date Amount
150866 Total
HAWCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL Total
HDsup HD Supply Waterworks LTD Line Item Account
150867 11 10 2011
Inv 3940323
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 27 2011 Adj valve ext stem
Inv 3940323 Total
Inv 3980898
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 03 2011 6 adapter rw gate valve
Inv 3980898 Total
150867 Total
hdsup HD Supply Waterworks LTD Total
HileKim Hile Kim Line Item Account
150868 11 10 2011
Inv 2002049 002
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 07 2011 refund zumba gold
Inv 2002049 002 Total
150868 Total
HileKim Hile Kim Total
HisInf Historical Information Gatherers Inc Line Item Account
150869 11 10 2011
Inv MBB 4902
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 20 2011 Skyview pkg GIS ready pkg
Inv MBB 4902 Total
Line Item Account
700 00004550
Line Item Account
700 00004550
Line Item Account
101 1539 3631
Line Item Account
720 00004130
40 00
40 00
366 06
366 06
975 56
975 56
1 341 62
1 341 62
48 00
48 00
48 00
48 00
210 00
210 00
150869 Total 210 00
HisInf Historical Information Gatherers Inc Total 210 00
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 17
445
Check Number Check Date Amount
INDLAN Indoor Landscapes Inc Total 199 86
HooThr Hoops Threads Line Item Account
150938 11 17 2011
Inv 2007
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 25 2011 Park Rec Logo clothing 101 1550 4240 628 00
Inv 2007 Total
101 1550 4140
628 00
150938 Total
700 00004140
628 00
HooThr Hoops Threads Total 628 00
ICMART ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST457 Line Item Account
Page 18
150939 11 17 2011
Inv 11182011
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 15 2011 11 18 11 ICMA 304303 101 0000 2009 1 970 01
11 15 2011 11 18 11 ICMA 304303 210 0000 2009 12 49
11 15 2011 11 18 11 ICMA 304303 720 0000 2009 100 00
Inv 11182011 Total 2 082 50
150939 Total 2 082 50
ICMART ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST457 Total 2 082 50
INDLAN Indoor Landscapes Inc Line Item Account
150870 11 10 2011
Inv 8120
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 01 2011 November Plant Service 101 11704300 199 86
Inv 8120 Total 199 86
150870 Total 199 86
INDLAN Indoor Landscapes Inc Total 199 86
JJKel J T Keller Associates Inc Line Item Account
150940 11 17 2011
Inv 8983548
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 31 2011 C1770 SIMP Inspection BK NCR 101 1320 4140 133 64
10 31 2011 C1770 SIMP Inspection BK NCR 101 1550 4140 133 64
10 31 2011 C1770 SIMP Inspection BK NCR 700 00004140 133 65
Inv 8983548 Total 400 93
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 18
446
Check Number Check Date Amount
150940 Total
JJKel J J Keller Associates Inc Total
JEFFIR JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC Line Item Account
150941 11 17 2011
Inv 182070
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 10 2011 Holmatro tool and accessories
Inv 182070 Total
150941 Total
JEFFIR JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC Total
JHLAR JH LARSON COMPANY Line Item Account
150871 11 10 2011
Inv 4360362 01
Line Item Date Line Item Descriotion
10 28 2011 100W MH Med M Tap core coil
Inv 43 603 62 01 Total
iF703flIIYomp
JHLAR JH LARSON COMPANY Total
JohnCaro Johnson Carole Line Item Account
150872 11 10 2011
Inv 102611
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 26 2011 Reimburse Caribou KCup
Inv 102611 Total
150872 Total
Line Item Account
400 4127 4705
Line Item Account
101 1550 4150
Line Item Account
101 1170 4110
400 93
400 93
15 711 76
15 711 76
15 711 76
15 711 76
535 91
535 91
535 91
535 91
34 99
34 99
34 99
JohnCaro Johnson Carole Total 34 99
JOHSUP JOHNSTONE SUPPLY Line Item Account
150873 11 10 2011
Inv 120949
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 03 2011 TAC Actuator 101 1190 4530 211 87
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 19
447
Check Number Check Date Amount
Inv 120949 Total 211 87
150873 Total
JOHSUP JOHNSTONE SUPPLY Total
kimhor KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC Line Item Account
150874 11 10 2011
Inv 4578915
Line Item Date Line Item Description
08 31 2011 Well 4 Watermain Imp
Inv 4578915 Total
Inv 4578918
Line Item Date Line Item Description
08 31 2011 TH101 Pioneer Trail
Inv 4578918 Total
Inv 4608887
Line Item Date Line Item Description
09 30 2011 Downtown Transit Station
Inv 4608887 Total
Inv 4608890
Line Item Date Line Item Description
09 30 2011 TH101 Intersection Improvement
Inv 4608890 Total
150874 Total
kimhor KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC Total
KINDDEBR KIND DEBRA Line Item Account
150875 11 10 2011
Inv 110911
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 09 2011 Chan Connection Winter 2011 112
Inv 110911 Total
150875 Total
Line Item Account
700 7025 4752
Line Item Account
420 4006 4752
Line Item Account
462 00004752
Line Item Account
420 4007 4752
Line Item Account
101 11104300
211 87
211 87
2 332 00
2 332 00
4 625 59
4 625 59
3 270 10
3 270 10
1 489 30
1 489 30
11 716 99
11 716 99
337 50
337 50
337 50
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 20
448
Check Number Check Date Amount
Line Item Date
KINDDEBR KIND DEBRA Total 337 50
K1evJon Klever Jon Line Item Account
Inv 10787220 Total
150876 11 10 2011
Inv 10823505
Inv 110811
Line Item Date
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 08 2011 Refund Badge Deposit 815 8230 2024 25 00
Inv 110811 Total 25 00
150876 Total
KlevJon Klever Jon Total
KoniMino Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc Line Item Account
150877 11 10 2011
Inv 219349016
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 31 2011 Canon IR105
Inv 219349016 Total
150877 Total
KoniMino Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc Total
lanend LANDS END CORPORATE SALES Line Item Account
150878 11 10 2011
Inv 10787220
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 19 2011 shirts logo application
Inv 10787220 Total
Inv 10823505
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 28 2011 vneck card logo application
Inv 10823505 Total
Inv 10844767
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 03 2011 return vneck card logo application
Inv 10844767 Total
150878 Total
Line Item Account
101 1120A410
Line Item Account
101 1250 4240
Line Item Account
101 1250 4240
Line Item Account
101 1250 4240
25 00
25 00
1 107 45
1 107 45
1 107 45
1 107 45
439 20
439 20
63 66
63 66
67 10
67 10
435 76
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 21
449
Check Number Check Date Amount
lanend LANDS END CORPORATE SALES Total
LEAMIN LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Line Item Account
150879 11 10 2011
Inv 155460
Line Item Date Line Item Description
09 01 2011 MN Cities Stormwater Coalitiojn Contributions
Inv 155460 Total
Inv 155558
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 08 2011 2011 Regional Meetings D Laufenburger
Inv 155558 Total
150879 Total
LEAMIN LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Total
LocLak Local Lakes Construction Line Item Account
150942 11 17 2011
Inv 111611
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 16 2011 Refund 2011 02843
11 16 2011 Refund 2011 02843
Inv 111611 Total
150942 Total
LocLak Local Lakes Construction Total
MargRich Marquette Richard E Line Item Account
150880 11 10 2011
Inv 2
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 21 2011 Commissioner Services Degler hearing
Inv 2 Total
150880 Total
MargRich Marquette Richard E Total
MERACE MERLINS ACE HARDWARE Line Item Account
Line Item Account
720 0000 4360
Line Item Account
101 1110 4370
Line Item Account
101 1250 3301
101 0000 2022
Line Item Account
603 6301 4300
435 76
875 00
875 00
40 00
40 00
915 00
915 00
206 84
7 50
214 34
214 34
214 34
541 41
541 41
541 41
541 41
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 22
450
Check Number Check Date Amount
150881 11 10 2011
Inv 103111
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
MERACE MERLINS ACE HARDWARE Total
10 31 2011 Misc parts supplies 101 1220 4520 53 01
10 31 2011 Misc parts supplies 101 1220 4120 3 20
10 31 2011 Misc parts supplies 101 1220 4140 5 40
10 31 2011 Misc parts supplies 101 1220 4290 212 32
10 31 2011 Misc parts supplies 101 1220 4375 5 80
10 31 2011 Misc parts supplies 700 0000 4260 13 06
10 31 2011 Misc parts supplies 700 00004510 64 40
10 31 2011 Misc parts supplies 700 00004530 12 10
10 31 2011 Misc parts supplies 700 0000 4552 73 53
10 31 2011 Misc parts supplies 700 7019 4150 9 60
10 31 2011 Misc parts supplies 701 0000 4150 20 29
10 31 2011 Misc parts supplies 101 13204120 19 36
10 31 2011 Misc parts supplies 101 1550 4120 4 82
10 31 2011 Mise parts supplies 101 1550 4151 49 94
Inv 103111 Total 546 83
150881 Total 546 83
MERACE MERLINS ACE HARDWARE Total 546 83
metfir METRO FIRE Line Item Account
150882 11 10 2011
Inv 42407
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 01 2011 SCBA Flow test service work 101 1220 4530 112 93
Inv 42407 Total 112 93
150882 Total 112 93
metfir METRO FIRE Total 112 93
METROC METROCALL Line Item Account
150883 11 10 2011
Inv UO315834K
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 01 2011 pager charges 101 1320 4310 4 87
Inv UO315834K Total 4 87
150883 Total 4 87
METROC METROCALL Total 4 87
METCO2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Line Item Account 701 00004509
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 23
451
Check Number Check Date Amount
150884 11 10 2011
Inv 974056
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 02 2011 wastewater services 701 0000 4509 126 667 01
Inv 974056 Total 126 667 01
150884 Total 126 667 01
METCO2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Total 126 667 01
metco Metropolitan Council Env Svcs Line Item Account 101 1250 3816
150885 11 10 2011
Inv 103111
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 31 2011 Oct 2011 SAC Report 101 1250 3816 156 10
10 31 2011 Oct 2011 SAC Report 701 0000 2023 15 610 00
Inv 103111 Total 15 453 90
150885 Total 15 453 90
metco Metropolitan Council Env Svcs Total 15 453 90
MinnVall Minnesota Valley Testing Laboratories Inc Line Item Account
150886 11 10 2011
Inv 575384
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 28 2011 Phosphorus Nitrogen Chlorophyll A 720 0000 4300 315 00
Inv 575384 Total 315 00
150886 Total 315 00
MinnVall Minnesota Valley Testing Laboratories Inc Total 315 00
minupre Minuteman Press Line Item Account
150887 11 10 2011
Inv 10257
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 04 2011 postcard sheets 101 1410 4340 603 42
Inv 10257 Total 603 42
150887 Total 603 42
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 24
452
Check Number Check Date Amount
minupre Minuteman Press Total
MNCHIL MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CTR Line Item Account
150943 11 17 2011
Inv 0014721669
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 15 2011 11 18 11 ID 001472166101
11 15 2011 11 18 11 ID 001472166101
Inv 0014721669 Total
Inv 0015200407
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 15 2011 11 18 11 ID 001520040501
11 15 2011 11 18 11 D 001520040501
Inv 0015200407 Total
150943 Total
MNCHIL MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CTR Total
mnlabo MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY Line Item Account 101 1250 3818
150888 11 10 2011
Inv 103111
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 31 2011 Oct 2011 Mthly Bldg Permit Surchg Report
10 31 2011 Oct 2011 Mthly Bldg Permit Surchg Report
Inv 103111 Total
150888 Total
mnlabo MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY Total
MNTRAN MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION Line Item Account
150944 11 17 2011
Inv 162
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 02 2011 4 8 5 101 Great Plains Blvd red LED
Inv 162 Total
150944 Total
Line Item Account
700 0000 2006
701 0000 2006
Line Item Account
700 0000 2006
701 0000 2006
Line Item Account
101 1250 3818
101 0000 2022
Line Item Account
101 1350 4565
603 42
289 28
147 72
437 00
179 57
36 85
216 42
653 42
653 42
65 10
3 103 14
3 038 04
3 038 04
3 038 04
269 95
269 95
269 95
MNTRAN MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION Total 269 95
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 25
453
Check Number Check Date Amount
MooInd Moonlight Industries LLC Line Item Account
150945 11 17 2011
Inv 5316
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 01 2011 Library Patch sheetrock prime paint 101 1190 4300 200 00
Inv 5316 Total 200 00
150945 Total
MooInd Moonlight Industries LLC Total
mooslloy Moosbrugger Lloyd J Line Item Account
150889 11 10 2011
Inv 10252011
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 25 2011 Commission Services Degler hearing
Inv 10252011 Total
150889 Total
mooslloy Moosbrugger Lloyd J Total
MOSBAR MOSS BARNETT Line Item Account
150946 11 17 2011
Inv 552318
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 31 2011 Cable TV Admin Legal Services
Inv 552318 Total
150946 Total
MOSBAR MOSS BARNETT Total
MTIDIS MTI DISTRIBUTING INC Line Item Account
150890 11 10 2011
Inv 819532 00
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 31 2011 Misc parts supplies
Inv 819532 00 Total
150890 Total
150947 11 17 2011
Line Item Account
603 6301 4300
Line Item Account
210 0000 4300
Line Item Account
101 1550 4120
200 00
200 00
772 22
772 22
772 22
772 22
8 391 04
8 391 04
8 391 04
8 391 04
1 934 89
1 934 89
1 934 89
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 26
454
Check Number Check Date Amount
Inv 819532 01
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 03 2011 Seal kits 101 1550 4120 167 14
Inv 819532 01 Total 167 14
150947 Total
MTIDIS MTI DISTRIBUTING INC Total
nagapp NAGELL APPRAISAL CONSULTING Line Item Account
150891 11 10 2011
Inv 17670
Line Item Date Line Item Description
05 17 2011 Chanhassen City Trail Project 11 05
Inv 17670 Total
Inv 18060
Line Item Date Line Item Description
09 15 2011 Water Tower Easement
Inv 18060 Total
150891 Total
nagapp NAGELL APPRAISAL CONSULTING Total
NATRET Nationwide Retirement Solutions Line Item Account
150948 11 17 2011
Inv
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 15 2011 PR Batch 00405 11 2011 Nationwide Retirement
11 15 2011 PR Batch 00405 11 2011 Nationwide Retirement
11 15 2011 PR Batch 00405 11 2011 Nationwide Retirement
11 15 2011 PR Batch 00405 11 2011 Nationwide Retirement
Inv Total
150948 Total
150949 11 17 2011
Inv
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 15 2011 PR Batch 00405 11 2011 USCM Fire Dept
Inv Total
Line Item Account
420 4007 4300
Line Item Account
700 7025 4300
Line Item Account
101 0000 2009
700 0000 2009
701 0000 2009
720 0000 2009
Line Item Account
101 0000 2009
lr YAE
2 102 03
2 850 00
2 850 00
800 00
800 00
3 650 00
3 650 00
4 019 88
298 05
143 79
100 00
4 561 72
4 561 72
476 28
476 28
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 27
455
Check Number Check Date Amount
150949 Total
NATRET Nationwide Retirement Solutions Total
NortHome Norton Homes Line Item Account
150950 11 17 2011
Inv 111611
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 16 2011 AsBuilt 6505 Fox Hollow Court
Inv 111611 Total
150950 Total
NortHome Norton Homes Total
OlseChad Olsen Chad Line Item Account
150952 11 17 2011
Inv 110411
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 04 2011 TV Remote
Inv 110411 Total
150952 Total
O1seChad Olsen Chad Total
OREAUT O Reilly Automotive Inc Line Item Account
150951 11 17 2011
Inv 103111
Line Item Date
10 31 2011
10 31 2011
10 31 2011
10 31 2011
10 31 2011
10 31 2011
Line Item Description
Misc parts supplies
Misc parts supplies
Misc parts supplies
Misc parts supplies
Misc parts supplies
Misc parts supplies
Inv 103111 Total
150951 Total
OREAUT O Reilly Automotive Inc Total
pjpro P J Promotions Line Item Account
150892 11 10 2011
Line Item Account
815 8226 2024
Line Item Account
101 1220 4290
Line Item Account
101 1220 4120
101 1220 4140
101 1320 4120
101 1320 4140
101 1550 4120
700 0000 4120
476 28
5 038 00
1 500 00
1 500 00
1 500 00
1 500 00
20 71
20 71
20 71
20 71
69 11
124 06
73 38
3 64
101 32
71 24
442 75
442 75
442 75
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 28
456
Check Number Check Date Amount
Inv 2304
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 03 2011 bomber jacket 101 12204375 58 50
Inv 2304 Total 58 50
150892 Total
pjpro P J Promotions Total
PioEng Pioneer Engineering P A Line Item Account
150953 11 17 2011
Inv 92124
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 31 2011 111252 Reflections at Lk Riley
Inv 92124 Total
150953 Total
PioEng Pioneer Engineering P A Total
pipser Pipe Services Corporation Line Item Account
150954 11 17 2011
Inv 2007505
Line Item Date Line Item Description
06 07 2011 Sewer cleaning 11 St Imp Proj 11 0 1
Inv 2007505 Total
Inv 2007522
Line Item Date Line Item Description
07 19 2011 Sewer cleaning 11 St Imp Proj 11 02
Inv 2007522 Total
150954 Total
pipser Pipe Services Corporation Total
PraPar Prairie Party Rental LLC Line Item Account
150955 11 17 2011
Inv 99721
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 07 2011 6 banquet tables 17
Inv 99721 Total
Line Item Account
410 0000 4701
Line Item Account
701 7024 4751
Line Item Account
701 7028 4751
Line Item Account
101 1530 4130
58 50
58 50
500 00
500 00
500 00
500 00
5 139 09
5 139 09
6 453 50
6 453 50
11 592 59
11 592 59
199 80
199 80
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 29
457
Check Number Check Date Amount
150955 Total
PraPar Prairie Party Rental LLC Total
PULHOM PULTE HOMES Line Item Account
150956 11 17 2011
Inv A
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 14 2011 AsBuilt 2560 Highcrest Circle
Inv A Total
Inv AA
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 14 2011 Landscape 4100 Pipewood Ln
Inv AA Total
Inv B
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 14 2011 AsBuilt 7120 Gunflint Trail
Inv B Total
Inv BB
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 14 2011 Erosion 4100 Pipewood Ln
Inv BB Total
Inv C
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 14 2011 Landscape 4031 Pipewood Ln
Inv C Total
Inv CC
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 14 2011 Erosion 7130 Gunflint Trl
Inv CC Total
Inv D
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 14 2011 Erosion 4031 Pipewood Ln
Inv D Total
Line Item Account
815 8226 2024
Line Item Account
815 8201 2024
Line Item Account
815 8226 2024
Line Item Account
815 8202 2024
Line Item Account
815 8201 2024
Line Item Account
815 8202 2024
Line Item Account
815 8202 2024
199 80
199 80
1 500 00
1 500 00
750 00
750 00
1 500 00
1 500 00
1 500 00
1 500 00
750 00
750 00
1 500 00
1 500 00
1 500 00
1 500 00
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 30
458
Check Number Check Date Amount
Inv DD
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Landscape 4040 Pipewood Ln 815 8201 2024 750 00
Inv DD Total 750 00
Inv E
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 AsBuilt 7170 Gunflint Trl 815 8226 2024 1 500 00
Inv E Total 1 500 00
Inv EE
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Erosion 4040 Pipewood Ln 815 8202 2024 1 500 00
Inv EE Total 1 500 00
Inv F
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 AsBuilt 2570 Highcrest Circle 815 8226 2024 1 500 00
Inv F Total 1 500 00
Inv FF
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Landscape 7110 Gunflint Trl 815 8201 2024 750 00
Inv FF Total 750 00
Inv G
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 AsBuilt 7481 Dogwood Rd 815 8226 2024 1 500 00
Inv G Total 1 500 00
Inv GG
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Erosion 7110 Gunflint Trl 815 8202 2024 1 500 00
Inv GG Total 1 500 00
Inv H
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 AsBuilt 7142 Highover Dr 815 8226 2024 1 500 00
Inv H Total 1 500 00
Inv HH
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Erosion 4101 Pipewood Ln 815 8202 2024 1 500 00
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 31
459
Check Number Check Date Amount
Inv HH Total 1 500 00
Inv I
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 AsBuilt 2565 Highcrest Circle 815 8226 2024 1 500 00
Inv I Total 1 500 00
Inv II
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Landscape 4101 Pipewood Ln 815 8201 2024 750 00
Inv II Total 750 00
Inv J
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Landscape 4081 Pipewood Ln 815 8201 2024 750 00
Inv J Total 750 00
Inv K
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Erosion 4081 Pipewood Ln 815 8202 2024 1 500 00
Inv K Total 1 500 00
Inv L
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Landscape 4091 Pipewood Ln 815 8201 2024 750 00
Inv L Total 750 00
Inv M
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Erosion 4091 Pipewood Ln 815 8202 2024 1 500 00
Inv M Total 1 500 00
Inv N
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Landscape 7481 Dogwood Rd 815 8201 2024 750 00
Inv N Total 750 00
Inv O
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Erosion 7481 Dogwood Rd 815 8202 2024 1 500 00
Inv O Total 1 500 00
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 32
460
Check Number Check Date Amount
Inv P
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Erosion 2570 Highcrest Cir 815 8202 2024 1 500 00
Inv P Total 1 500 00
Inv Q
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Landscape 4041 Pipewood Ln 815 8201 2024 750 00
Inv Q Total 750 00
Inv R
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Erosion 4041 Pipewood Ln 815 8202 2024 1 500 00
Inv R Total 1 500 00
Inv S
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Landscape 4071 Pipewood Ln 815 8201 2024 750 00
Inv S Total 750 00
Inv T
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Erosion 4071 Pipewood Ln 815 8202 2024 1 500 00
Inv T Total 1 500 00
Inv U
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Landscape 2605 Arrowhead Ln 815 8201 2024 750 00
Inv U Total 750 00
Inv V
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Erosion 2605 Arrowhead Ln 815 8202 2024 1 500 00
Inv V Total 1 500 00
Inv W
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Landscape 7142 Highover Dr 815 8201 2024 750 00
Inv W Total 750 00
Inv X
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Erosion 7142 Highover Dr 815 8202 2024 1 500 00
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 33
461
Check Number Check Date Amount
Inv X Total
Inv Y
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Landscape 4111 Pipewood Ln 815 8201 2024
Inv Y Total
Inv Z
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Erosion 4111 Pipewood Ln 815 8202 2024
Inv Z Total
150956 Total
PULHOM PULTE HOMES Total
qualcon Quality Control Integration Inc Line Item Account
150893 11 10 2011
Inv 1324
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 28 2011 Oct 2011 Monthly Maint Fee 700 0000 4530
Inv 1324 Total
150893 Total
qualcon Quality Control Integration Inc Total
quill QUILL CORPORATION Line Item Account
150894 11 10 2011
Inv 7788515
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 02 2011 misc office supplies 101 1170 4110
Inv 7788515 Total
150894 Total
quill QUILL CORPORATION Total
RBMSER RBM SERVICES INC Line Item Account
150895 11 10 2011
Inv 16558
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
1 500 00
750 00
750 00
1 500 00
1 500 00
42 750 00
42 750 00
1 500 00
1 500 00
1 500 00
1 500 00
77 98
77 98
77 98
77 98
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 34
462
Check Number Check Date Amount
10 31 2011 Night Janitorial City Hall 101 1170 4350 2 498 33
Inv 16558 Total 2 498 33
Inv 16559
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 31 2011 Library Janitorial 101 11904350 2 853 56
Inv 16559 Total 2 853 56
150895 Total 5 351 89
RBMSER RBM SERVICES INC Total 5 351 89
RelOff Reliable Office Supplies Line Item Account
150896 11 10 2011
Inv CJF70800
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 03 2011 MP Color 8x 11 24 EMRLD 101 1170 4110 172 97
Inv CJF70800 Total 172 97
Inv YWR47498
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
08 24 2011 CR Handling 101 1170 4110 1 48
Inv YWR47498 Total 1 48
Inv YXC71201
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
09 20 2011 Paper 101 1170 4110 60 21
Inv YXC71201 Total 60 21
150896 Total 231 70
RelOff Reliable Office Supplies Total 231 70
RICBUS RICHFIELD BUS COMPANY Line Item Account
150957 11 17 2011
Inv 7189
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 10 2011 Rec Ctr Chaska Lodge Star Tribune 101 1560 4300 433 75
Inv 7189 Total 433 75
150957 Total 433 75
AP Check Detail I1 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 35
463
Check Number Check Date
894 00
Amount
894 00
SHEWIL SHERWIN WILLIAMS Line Item Account
RICBUS RICHFIELD BUS COMPANY Total 433 75
rylhom Ryland Homes Line Item Account
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
150958 11 17 2011
700 0000 4150 195 49
10 21 2011 APWA Gm Blue
Inv 111411
Inv 3647 3 Total 390 97
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 AsBuilt 1655 Hemlock Way 815 8226 2024 1 500 00
Inv 111411 Total 1 500 00
Inv 111611
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 16 2011 AsBuilt 1735 Hemlock Way 815 8226 2024 1 500 00
Inv 111611 Total 1 500 00
150958 Total 3 000 00
rylhom Ryland Homes Total 3 000 00
TJPai Shanahan Terry Joseph Line Item Account
150959 11 17 2011
Inv 100611
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 06 2011 Utility box plow wing parts 101 1320 4520 894 00
Inv 100611 Total 894 00
150959 Total 894 00
TJPai Shanahan Terry Joseph Total 894 00
SHEWIL SHERWIN WILLIAMS Line Item Account
150897 11 10 2011
Inv 3647 3
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 21 2011 APWA Gm Blue 700 0000 4150 195 49
10 21 2011 APWA Gm Blue 701 0000 4150 195 48
Inv 3647 3 Total 390 97
150897 Total 390 97
SHEWIL SHERWIN WILLIAMS Total 390 97
SHOTRU SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE Line Item Account
150898 11 10 2011
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 36
464
Check Number Check Date Amount
Inv 106985
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 29 2011 Spare key Rescue 21 101 12204520 3 52
Inv 106985 Total 3 52
150898 Total 3 52
SHOTRU SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE Total 3 52
SofHou SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL Line Item Account
150899 11 10 2011
Inv B00442669
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 03 2011 Microsoft Office License Software Assurance 400 4117 4703 4 873 50
Inv B00442669 Total 4 873 50
150899 Total 4 873 50
SofHou SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL Total 4 873 50
speenv Specialized Environmental Technologies Inc Line Item Account
150900 11 10 2011
Inv 10466
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 31 2011 compost 720 7202 4320 154 88
Inv 10466 Total 154 88
150900 Total 154 88
speenv Specialized Environmental Technologies Inc Total 154 88
SponGlor Spong Gloria Line Item Account
150960 11 17 2011
Inv 111611
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 16 2011 Refund Defensive Driving 11 16 11 101 1560 3637 32 00
Inv 111611 Total 32 00
150960 Total 32 00
SponGlor Spong Gloria Total 32 00
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 37
465
Check Number Check Date Amount
SPSCOM SPS COMPANIES INC Line Item Account
150901 11 10 2011
Inv S2451219 001
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 27 2011 Milrose 101 1190 4260 16 27
Inv S2451219 001 Total 16 27
150901 Total 16 27
SPSCOM SPS COMPANIES INC Total 16 27
STREIC STREICHER S Line Item Account
150902 11 10 2011
Inv I874191
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 18 2011 Collar insignia 5 stars 101 1220 4240 42 73
Inv I874191 Total 42 73
Inv I877656
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 01 2011 collar insignias badges 101 1220 4240 528 95
Inv I877656 Total 528 95
150902 Total 571 68
streic STREICHER S Total 571 68
StutJohn Stutzman John Line Item Account
150961 11 17 2011
Inv 111411
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Change for Chan Jam 101 0000 1027 200 00
Inv 111411 Total 200 00
150961 Total 200 00
StutJohn Stutzman John Total 200 00
supwir Superior Wireless Communications Line Item Account
150962 11 17 2011
Inv 31215
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 10 2011 Spare Nextel Cell Phone 101 1160 4530 85 15
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 38
466
Check Number Check Date Amount
Inv 31215 Total 85 15
150962 Total
supwir Superior Wireless Communications Total
TaiOn Tailors On 79th Line Item Account
150963 11 17 2011
Inv A7666
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 10 2011 1 fire hose
Inv A7666 Total
Inv A8397
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 10 2011 40 fire hoses @ 9 ea
Inv A8397 Total
150963 Total
TaiOn Tailors On 79th Total
tecusa Technogym USA Corp Line Item Account
150903 11 10 2011
Inv 11006159
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 19 2011 Front upper casing
Inv 11006159 Total
150903 Total
tecusa Technogym USA Corp Total
TENNAN TENNANT Line Item Account
150964 11 17 2011
Inv 910660967
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 04 2011 Filter kit panl syn replmt
Inv 910660967 Total
150964 Total
Line Item Account
101 1220 4290
Line Item Account
101 1220 4290
Line Item Account
101 1220 4530
Line Item Account
101 1550 4120
85 15
85 15
10 69
10 69
384 75
384 75
395 44
USP IEM
219 22
219 22
219 22
219 22
249 34
249 34
249 34
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 39
467
Check Number Check Date Amount
TENNAN TENNANT Total 249 34
ThoMue Thomas Mueller Construction Line Item Account
150965 11 17 2011
Inv 111411
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 14 2011 Erosion 9186 Springfield Dr 815 8202 2024 250 00
Inv 111411 Total 250 00
150965 Total
ThoMue Thomas Mueller Construction Total
Travel Travelers Line Item Account
150904 11 10 2011
Inv 394047
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 31 2011 Deductible Self insured invoice
Inv 394047 Total
150904 Total
Travel Travelers Total
TWISEE TWIN CITY SEED CO Line Item Account
150905 11 10 2011
Inv 26661
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 27 2011 Annual ryegrass athletic turf mixture
Inv 26661 Total
150905 Total
TWISEE TWIN CITY SEED CO Total
UNIWAY UNITED WAY Line Item Account
150966 11 17 2011
Inv
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 15 2011 PR Batch 00405 11 2011 United Way
11 15 2011 PR Batch 00405 11 2011 United Way
Inv Total
Line Item Account
101 1170 4483
Line Item Account
101 1550 4150
Line Item Account
101 0000 2006
720 0000 2006
250 00
250 00
1 000 00
1 000 00
1 000 00
1 000 00
304 59
304 59
304 59
304 59
42 23
4 00
46 23
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 40
468
Check Number Check Date Amount
150966 Total 46 23
UNIWAY UNITED WAY Total
UNIMIN UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Line Item Account
150967 11 17 2011
Inv 111611
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 16 2011 License Agreement Trail
Inv 111611 Total
150967 Total
150968 11 17 2011
Inv 111611
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 16 2011 Temp Construction Agreement
Inv 111611 Total
150968 Total
UNIMIN UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Total
VIKAUT VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO Line Item Account
150969 11 17 2011
Inv 157114
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 07 2011 Inspection of one dry system
Inv 157114 Total
150969 Total
VIKAUT VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO Total
VIKIND VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER Line Item Account
150906 11 10 2011
Inv 283014
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 20 2011 Visors Hearing Protectors Ratchet Chain saw prochaps
Inv 283014 Total
Line Item Account
601 6020 4300
Line Item Account
601 6020 4300
Line Item Account
101 1550 4300
Line Item Account
101 1320 4120
46 23
5 765 00
5 765 00
5 765 00
4 228 00
4 228 00
4 228 00
9 993 00
560 00
560 00
560 00
560 00
473 95
473 95
150906 Total 473 95
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 41
469
Check Number Check Date Amount
VIKIND VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER Total
WatCon Water Conservation Services Inc Line Item Account
150907 11 10 2011
Inv 2802
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 26 2011 6561 Gray Fox Curve W78th Market Blvd
Inv 2802 Total
150907 Total
WatCon Water Conservation Services Inc Total
WILNUR WILSON S NURSERY INC Line Item Account
150970 11 17 2011
Inv 52265
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 31 2011 Edging plastic stake kit
Inv 52265 Total
Inv 52333
Line Item Date Line Item Description
11 08 2011 Spirea Anthony Waterer City Hall
Inv 52333 Total
150970 Total
WILNUR WILSON S NURSERY INC Total
WINGRICH WING RICHARD Line Item Account
150971 11 17 2011
Inv 103111
Line Item Date Line Item Description
10 31 2011 Station 2 Oct 2011 Cleaner
Inv 103111 Total
150971 Total
Line Item Account
700 0000 4552
Line Item Account
491 4301 4701
Line Item Account
101 1550 4150
Line Item Account
101 12204350
473 95
461 20
461 20
461 20
461 20
32 06
32 06
267 19
267 19
299 25
299 25
73 33
73 33
73 33
WINGRICH WING RICHARD Total 73 33
WMMUE WM MUELLER SONS INC Line Item Account
150908 11 10 2011
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 42
470
Check Number Check Date Amount
Inv 171290
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 06 2011 Fine bit mix blacktop curb mix 700 0000 4552 856 34
10 06 2011 Fine bit mix blacktop curb mix 420 0000 4751 1 301 53
Inv 171290 Total 2 157 87
Inv 171386
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 10 2011 Fine bit mix blacktop 420 0000 4751 162 37
Inv 171386 Total 162 37
Inv 171588
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 17 2011 Fine bit mix blacktop curb mix 420 0000 4751 1 706 84
Inv 171588 Total 1 706 84
Inv 171589
Line Item Date Line Item Descrintion Line Item Account
10 17 2011 tack oil 420 00004751 468 91
Inv 171589 Total 468 91
Inv 171773
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 21 2011 Fine bit mix blacktop curb mix 420 0000 4751 3 492 25
Inv 171773 Total 3 492 25
Inv 171831
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 24 2011 Fine bit mix blacktop curb mix 420 0000 4751 857 37
Inv 171831 Total 857 37
Inv 171871
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 25 2011 Screened fil dump charge 700 00004552 524 07
Inv 171871 Total 524 07
Inv 171872
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 25 2011 Bank fill san 700 0000 4552 412 98
Inv 171872 Total 412 98
Inv 172018
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 43
471
Check Number Check Date Amount
10 31 2011 Fine bix mix blacktop curb mix 420 0000 4751 1 068 92
Inv 172018 Total 1 068 92
150908 Total 10 851 58
150972 11 17 2011
Inv 172075
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
10 31 2011 1 1 2 clear 491 4301 4701 326 44
Inv 172075 Total 326 44
150972 Total 326 44
WMMUE WM MUELLER SONS INC Total 11 178 02
WSDAR WS DARLEY CO Line Item Account
150909 11 10 2011
Inv 17002436
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 02 2011 double male adapter 101 1220 4120 24 43
Inv 17002436 Total 24 43
150909 Total 24 43
150973 11 17 2011
Inv 17002863
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 07 2011 Nozzle steam straightener 101 1220 4260 272 69
Inv 17002863 Total 272 69
150973 Total 272 69
WSDAR WS DARLEY CO Total 297 12
wsb WSB ASSOCIATES INC Line Item Account
150910 11 10 2011
Inv I
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 02 2011 3829 Yuma Dr Drainage Imp Project 720 0000 4300 727 00
11 02 2011 September Cartegraph GIS Service Agreement 701 0000 4551 1 806 00
Inv 1 Total 2 533 00
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 44
472
Check Number Check Date
150974 11 17 2011
Amount
Inv 3
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
325 00
11 02 2011 Kerber Pond Slope Stabilization 420 0000 4751 2 002 00
11 02 2011 Kerber Pond Slope Stabilization 720 00004300 2 002 00
Inv 3 Total 4 004 00
Inv 5
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
11 02 2011 2012 Street Improvement Project 601 6026 4752 7 172 00
Inv 5 Total 7 172 00
Inv 6
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
09 28 2011 Aug 2011 GIS AMS Tech Support Train 720 0000 4300 1 058 00
Inv 6 Total 1 058 00
150910 Total 14 767 00
150974 11 17 2011
Inv 7
Line Item Date Line Item Description Line Item Account
04 28 2011 Lk Susan Hills Drainage Improv 720 0000 4300 325 00
Inv 7 Total 325 00
150974 Total 325 00
WSB WSB ASSOCIATES INC Total 15 092 00
Total 561 998 43
AP Check Detail 11 17 2011 10 06 AM Page 45
473