Loading...
26-01 CC PresentationPlanning Case #2026-01 Chanhassen Community Center Planning Commission Public Hearing –February 17, 2026 City Council –February 23, 2026 Requesting Site Plan Approval How did we get here? •1995 – Joint Powers Agreement between City of Chanhassen and Eastern Carver County School District establishes the current Chanhassen Recreation Center. •2021 Site Facilities Study - many facility updates are necessary to meet the demand of the growing community. •2022 Parks Referendum Task Force – reviewed solutions to address facilities study issues raise. Ultimately, recommended pursuing construction of a new community center with primary funding source being a local option sales tax. How did we get here? •July 22 / August 12, 2024 – City Council meetings to discuss ballot question language. •September 2024 – A four page informational mailer sent to each home in Chanhassen sharing full financing plan, amenity information, property tax projections, and ballot question language. •November 2024 – Chanhassen residents voted to support a local option sales tax to provide funding for a new community center. How did we get here? •Q1 2025 – Business outreach to inform businesses of local option sales tax and provide city departments for key staff and resources. •April 2025 – Tour of several nearby community centers. •May 2025 – City Council meeting discussing tour takeaways and review early community center concepts How did we get here? •September 2025 – City Council work session reviewing project and budget. •January 2026 – Community Open House •Digital/Email Engagement – prominent topic in city communications throughout 2025 featured in “Chan-Happenings” and “City Projects & Construction” email newsletters. 1,526 total clicks/engagements which was the highest across all email communications. Site Plan Application Development Location Current Zoning Designation: Planned Unit Development (PUD) 2040 Land Use Plan Office/Commercial Communications •Proposed Development Sign placed on property on 1/29/26 •Email sent to the “Proposed Developments” email group on 2/5/26 •Postcards sent to neighbors within 500 ft on 2/5/26 •Public Hearing Notice posted in the Sun Sailor on 2/5/26 Level of City Discretion The city’s discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with zoning ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the city shall approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. 1.(Is / Is Not) consistent with the elements of development guides, including the Comprehensive Plan 2.(Is / Is Not) consistent with the site plan review requirements 3.(Does / Does Not) preserve the site in its natural state to the extent practicable 4.(Does / Does Not) create a harmonious relationship of buildings and open space 5.(Does / Does Not) create a harmonious design for structures and site features 6.(Does / Does Not) protect adjacent neighboring properties through reasonable provisions for drainage, buffers, view preservation, light, and air 7.(Is / Is Not) within the Highway Corridor districts consistent with the purpose, intent and standards in the HC district. 8.(Is / Is Not) within the Bluff Creek Overlay (BCO) district, consistent with the purpose, intent, and standards in the BCO district. 9.(Does / Does Not) maintain an acceptable road system level of service Site Plan Review Site Plan Review •The Applicant is proposing the construction of a new community center for the City of Chanhassen. •This community center contains two ice rinks, a concessions area, community rooms, and field house amenities. Site Plan Review – Site Furnishings •The proposal includes bike racks, benches, and tables with umbrellas. Site Plan Review - Architecture Proposed Materials: Proposed Materials: Site Plan Review - Architecture Site Plan Review Landscaping: • Total proposed canopy coverage and buffer yard plantings exceed city requirements •Trees required: 60 •Trees proposed: 314 •The vehicular use area landscaping plan being finalized. •All plantings must meet city diversity requirements. Site Plan Review Screening: •Utility boxes are proposed in the south-west corner of the site. •All utility boxes are out of the view of the road and propose additional landscape screening. •A wing wall is proposed to screen the loading area Site Plan Review – Code Compliance Lot Ordinance Requirements Subject Site Area 10,000 square feet 13 acres Lot Coverage 70% across the entire development 79.6%* Building Height Principal 2 stories 2 stories Building Setbacks Front yard 5’288.24’ Rear yard 5’79.65’ Side yard 50’165’ & 56.18’ Parking Setback All Yards 10’>10’ *Individual sites are permitted to exceed the maximum hardcover percentage Site Plan Review – Parking City Code Section 20-1124(a)(7): “The parking requirement for uses not listed in this division may be established by the city based on the characteristics of the use and available information on parking demand for such use.” Site Plan Review – Parking Community Centers Chanhassen Maple Grove Edina Building Size (sf) 194,780 233,899 200,000 Ice Sheets 2 2 4 Commercial Tenants/Partners 1 1 2 Turf Fields (indoor or domed)Yes Yes Yes Indoor Aquatics No Yes No Athletic Fields (outdoor)No No Yes (4 baseball fields) Parking Spaces 501 644 780 Site Plan Review – Parking •175 spaces per ice rink recommended. •450 spaces established by staff as minimum threshold. •501 parking spaces currently proposed. •Larger events such as graduation ceremonies will likely require off-site parking to be secured by event organizer. •SW Transit ramp located 1.5 miles to the east Site Plan Review – Parking Schematic Design - 433 parking stalls Site Plan Review – Parking Current Design - 501 parking stalls Site Plan Review - Traffic •In 2023, a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was completed for the entire Avienda PUD. •The applicant provided a memorandum updating the TIA to include the proposed community center information. •No modifications to nearby streets or intersections required. Wetlands •Wetlands are present just to the south of the project site •A wetland delineation was approved with the Avenida Final Plat ~ 2017 •Design shows compliance with wetland and buffer setback rules Stormwater Management •Major drainage patterns remain the same •Plans propose to utilize and improve three existing stormwater basins •Ponds will be utilized for reuse – irrigating areas throughout the development 1.(IS) consistent with the elements of development guides, including the Comprehensive Plan 2.(IS) consistent with the site plan review requirements 3.(DOES) preserve the site in its natural state to the extent practicable 4.(DOES) create a harmonious relationship of buildings and open space 5.(DOES) create a harmonious design for structures and site features 6.(DOES) protect adjacent neighboring properties through reasonable provisions for drainage, buffers, view preservation, light, and air 7.(IS NOT) within the Highway Corridor districts. 8.(IS NOT) within the Bluff Creek Overlay (BCO) district 9.(DOES) maintain an acceptable road system level of service Site Plan Review Planning Commission Recommendation “The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the requested site plan and the adoption of the findings of fact and decision subject to the conditions listed in the staff report.” City Council Discussion Proposed Motion "The Chanhassen City Council approves the requested site plan for the Chanhassen Community Center, subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision." Supplemental Informtion Site Plan Review Lighting •Light posts are limited to 30 feet in height •Fixtures shall be shielded and “cut off” angles no greater than 90 degrees •Light levels are limited to ½ foot candle at property lines. Site Plan Review - Utilities •Applicant proposes to collect sanitary sewer and convey via a public lift station. •Watermain will connect existing stubs provide via the Avienda project. Grading & Drainage – Existing Conditions • Project site was mass graded in 2021 as part of the Avienda Development Final Plat •3 Existing Stormwater Basins •NE corner along Bluff Creek Blvd •SE and SW corners upstream of Wetland Complex •Stormwater runoff generally flows from north to south •Majority of drainage is conveyed through stormwater basins •Site is flatter to the north •Steep slopes are present to the south Stormwater Management •Project is required to meet City and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District requirements •Water quality (WQ) •Rate Control •Buffers •Rate and WQ rules being met with wet ponds and reuse system •Design will need to comply with stormwater master plan for development