Loading...
79-02 - Trappers Pass PUD pt 1V I 11 L CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING APRIL 20, 1987 I Mayor Hamilton called the meeting to order. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilman Boyt, Councilman Horn, Councilman Geving and Councilman Johnson STAFF PRESENT: Don Ashworth, Gary Warren, Barbara Dacy, Jo Ann Olsen and Todd Gerhardt APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Councilman Boyt moved, Councilman Johnson seconder] to approve the agenda with the following changes and additions: Mayor Hamilton stated that item 4 had been approved by the Board of Appeals and Adjustments but Councilman Boyt wanted to discuss the item further so it was moved to after item 12 on the agenda; Councilman Geving wanted a report from the City Engineer on the potential for a sprinkling ban for the City. All voted in favor of the agenda as amended and motion carried. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman Geving moved, Councilman Horn seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: a. Site Plan Review, Redmond Building Expansion, 18930 West 78th Street. Trappers Pass Plat Addition: Final Plat Approval d. Approval of Change Order Request, Business Park 5th Addition. e. City Council Minutes dated April 6, 1987 as amended by Councilman Boyt on page 171 his comment at the bottom of the page should read, "I just wanted to emphasize that ... and I don't know that it would be in line with..."; page 177 at the bottom of the page, second line a typing error "going"; and on page 193 at the bottom of the page on the second line it should read, "he mentions that he bought his property..." Planning Commission Minutes dated April 8, 1987 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes dated April 7, 1987 All voted in favor and motion carried. Consent Agenda item 1(c) was moved on the agenda to be included with item 6. VISITORS PRESENTATION: Arthur Owens: I own the property that you passed a resolution a couple weeks ago to have a quick take order condemning for the water tower. What I would like to do is to have -the order rescinded and that we have a public hearing on that. There are people who would like to talk about that. Especially as property owners we would like to be able to talk against it. Since there has been no public hearing on it and since it does take a change in the zoning, I think that's only right that there should be a public hearing on it. 1 198 City Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 Mayor Hamilton: All I can comment on is that that item is in the courts and I think you know Art you have every opportunity to make any comments you want at that level and that item would be decided by people who are going to look at all sides of that issue. It's actually pass the Council's hands at this point. It is in the Court's system as you know. Arthur Owens: I think that it seems to me that the Council is more responsive to the people in the area than the Courts would necessarily be and since there was no public hearing on it, I think that the Council acted in error to move to condemn to quick take on this. It really surprises me that we were not even notified of the fact that the Council was going to vote on it that night. I understand it was published in the paper but how many of us as citizens look at the paper at every Council agenda. Mayor Hamilton: VL-ren't you notified? Arthur Owens: No sir, we were not notified. Don Ashworth: I know of no personal notice that went out but it should be recalled by the Council that the whole water system study has occurred over the past year and a half and has appeared on numerous agendas since that time and of course, Mr. Owens was notified and did provide a Right of Entry and was given various documents through that whole process. I would have guessed that if there would have been a problem through that timeframe that he might have approached us. City Council could consider this request. It could go on for May 4th or it could go on for April 27th. Mayor Hamilton: I think what we need to do is consider Mr. Owens' request and ask our legal counsel what our options are and ask for their advice at this point so we will take your request under advisement. We'll talk to our legal counsel and see what they suggest we do. Arthur Owens: Just a reminder that we were in Court on this and your legal counsel decided that because we had representation that they would rather have another time on it. It's unfortunate, we were ready to go ahead but they refused to go ahead on it so an agreement with the Court that we would bring it back to the Council to have it responded to here before the Court would take it. With the quick take, the council has to make a decision and they have to bring it back before I think June 4th. Councilman Geving: Are you saying Art that there is a possibility that we can negotiate this before June 4th and resolve it? Arthur Owens: I think it easily could be resolved before June 4th and pick another site. There's no question about that. Mayor Hamilton: I think what we need to do, as stated, is talk to our legal counsel and we'll see what they suggest and depending on what they advise, put it on the agenda to have a public hearing. A public hearing would not be here, it would be at the Planning Commission. 2 REGULAR CHANHASSEN CI COUNCIL MEETING February 24, 1986 Mayor Hamilton called the meeting to order. to the Flag. Members Present Councilman Horn, Councilwoman Watson, Councilman Geving, and Councilwoman Swenson Members Absent None Staff Present Don Ashworth, Barbara Dacy and Bill Monk The meeting was opened with the Pledge APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor Hamilton moved to approve the agenda as presented with the addition of discussion on the newspaper delivery. Motion seconded by Councilwoman Watson. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Watson and Swenson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. CONSENT AGENDA• Councilwoman Watson moved to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendation: 1, a. Approval of F•in:,l Plat, Che-tnut 4idge at Near Mountain 7th and 8th Additions, 1_un:igren Brother . b. Certificate of Plat Correction, Rolling Hills. Motion seconded by Councilman Horn. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Watson and Swenson, Councilmen Horn and Geving. No negative votes. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION REQUEST TO SPLIT A PLATTED LOT FOR A TWIN HOME, LOT 5, BLOCK 2, CHANHASSEN ESTATES SECOND ADDITION: Mayor Hamilton called the hearing to order. William Wisely, owner, was present. Mayor Hamilton - Is there anyone from the public wishing to comment on this item? If not, I would entertain a motion to close the public hearing. Councilman Geving moved to close the public hearing. Motion seconded by Councilwoman Watson. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION REQUEST TO SPLIT A PLATTED LOT FOR A TWIN HOME, LOT 51 BLOCK 2, CHANHASSEN ESTATES SECOND ADDITION: Councilman Horn - I guess I am getting confused on what our policy is on metes and bounds and what isn't. It seems like a few weeks ago we wouldn't let anything go through on metes and bounds and now we are in an established plat and we are letting a metes and bounds subdivision go through now. Council Meeting February 1986 -2- Barb Dac - The one section of the subdivision ordinance that allowed metes and bounds division of a platted lot was to avoid the situation where a property owner did have the ability to subdivide their lot and requiring a plat for that individual lot would cause probably more cost for them than is necessary if the legal descrip- tion could be accomplished in the metes and bounds manner that is simple and easy to read. This particular application, because of the orientation of the unit on the lot that creates an angle of the lotline which does does create a little more involved metes and bounds description beyond the east half of Lot 5 and the west half of Lot 5, however it is an existing situation and the only alternative would be that the lot itself be replatted. The intent of the ordinance was to allow individual platted lot to be subdivided by a simple description so there is the east half of Lot 5 and the west half of Lot 5 but this particular situation is unique because of the existing structure on the lot. Councilman Horn - What we are saying is if it's a simple description we will go ahead and do it. This one isn't a simple description but the house already exists. Why don't we do this with all the twin homes in Chanhassen Estates? We had a request for this on'e but what says we won't get this request on all of them. Barb Dac - We may get those requests. What would happen is that we would have to coordinate a combined plat of all the lots and work with all of the property owners and property owners share the cost of the replatting of the entire four or five lots that are now duplexes. Councilman Horn - Looking at it from my standpoint I think it makes more sense if we allow metes and bounds on a temporary situation where someone is going to come along in the future with a known plat and make it final. That this is a temporary situation, I don't see that in this case and it seems like we are going to have a metes and bounds description right in the middle of a totally platted area. I find a little problem with that. Bill Monk - One of the things that comes up on these all the time is that when you have a plat, this one Chanhassen Estates, what you see happening and what you want to get away from a lot of times is a lot by lot subdivision such as this one where all of a sudden we are requiring this individual to plat and all of a sudden you have Chanhassen Estates Third Addition and the guy next door wants to plat and you have got a Chanhassen Estates Fourth Addition, Fifth Addition and on down the line for each one of these that wants to split so I guess the interpretation that staff has taken is that if we can get an easy to understand description on a platted lot and in essense it is not a metes and bounds description because it is a longer description of a platted parcel, I guess I am of the opinion that is easier to work with than with requiring him to replat on a lot by lot split basis which could occur on all of these duplexes. One of the reasons that I am of the opinion that a split of this kind is easier to understand because the lots then continue to follow in natural sequence. Councilman Horn - Can't there be Lot 5A and Lot 5B. Bill Monk - It would have to have a new name. It can't be the same plat. It would have to be Chanhassen Estates Fourth Addition. If it's platted it would have to have a separate legal by law. That's the problem you run into when you replat. If we can get the description to something understandable, staff wishes to proceed in this manner and that's why that provision in the ordinance was put in there. Councilman Horn - We would have the same situation had we required a plat on the Eide property. He would have come in with Eide Addition One and then as soon as MN 0025 S O I L I N T E R P R E T A T I O N S R E C 0 k MLRA(S): 1079 90. 919 1026, 1039 104 IESTHERVTLLr 41 REV. JJM,ELBs 10-83 TYPIC HAPLUDOLLS.-SANDY. MIXED♦ MESIC _ THE ESTHERVTLLF SERIES CONSISTS OF WELL AND SOMEWHAT EXCESSIVELY DRAINED SOILS FORMED IN LOAMY SEDIMENTS SHALLOW OVER SANDY AND GRAVELLY SEDIMENTS ON OUTWASH PLAINS AND STREAM TERRACES. THE SURFACE SOIL IS BLACK AND VERY DARK GRAY SANDY LOAM 13 INCHES THICK. THE SUBSOIL IS DARK BROWN SANDY LOAM AND LOAMY SAND 10 INCHES THICK. THE SUBSTRATUM IS GRAYISH BROWN, YELLOWISH BROWN AND LIGHT YELLOWISH BROWN GRAVELLY COAPSE SAND. SLOPES RANGE FROM D TO 25 PERCENT. MOST AREAS ARE FQ,g_CRQELAND�-------- -_--_______------- _--_-_-_-_---- ----- - ---- -_------ ---------- ------ ---TOOT___-__ ?---------------_-------------------ESIItItSEII 54�� PROPERTj,ES_tAl-__---------__-~_--_--_�-_-TOOT~' !DEPTHS iFRACT:PERCENT OF MATERIAL LESS ILIOUID IPLAS-_? :(IN.)S USDA TEXTURE I UNIFIED ? AASHTO 1>3 IN: THAN 3__-PASSING SIEVE NO__S LIMIT :TICITY? :INDEX 1 L-------~--------~---------------------------DEX 1 0-131SL, COSL ism, SM-SC, SC IA-29 A-4 1 0-5 190-100 80-100 50-75 25-50 1 20-30 S 2-10 : ! 0-131L !CL-ML. CL !A-49 A-6 ! 0-5 .90-100 80-100 5P-75 50-60 : 25-40 : 4-15 1 113-18:SL, L. COSL :SM, SM-SC. SC IA-29 A-49 A-1 1 0-5 1.85-100 RD-95 40-75 15-45 1 20-30 1 2-8 1 :18-60:COS. GR-COS, LCOS !SP, SP-SM, SM, GP 1A-1 t 0-10:55-90 50-85 10-40 2-25 1 - ! NP 1 i 1 -ate------- iDEPTHICLAY !MOIST B'ULKI PERMEA- t AVAILABLE t SOIL t SALINITY 1 SHRINK- !FROSIONiWIND :ORGANIC! CORROSIVITY i :(IN.):(PCT): DENSITY I BILITY ?WATER CAPACITYSREACTIONI(MMHOS/CM)t SWELL 1FaTORSIEROD.IMATTER : 1 L_iStLS.l1�.S__i�I1j/HR)__i~_JINLIDIL__—i—Setl2 t _-_—_1Q.2IEtiII_4.i K IMUP! S��IL_i_$Z�EL—LS�4i EIE! 0-131 5-15f1.25-1.35 S 2.0-6.0 1 0.13-0.18 15.6-7.3 1 - I LOW '.20' 3 1 3 1 2-4 LOw_-___LOW-_ ! 0-13110-18:1.35-1.45 i 2.0-6.0 1 0.19-0.22 15.6-7.3 : - I LOW 1.20: 3 t 5 : 2-4 113-18110-18:1.35-1.60 : 2.0-6.0 1 0.09-0.14 :5.6-7.3 1 - i LOW 1.20i _' .18-60' 0-8 51.50-1.65 1 >6.0 1 0.02-0.04 :6.6-8.4 1 - LOW 1.10, - _--1-_----------------------- ------ FLOODING - I ~ HYATF�R TAEEEw_�C�EMENIE�D_EAN�_-_gEP$QLK_____SUBS�,LOEEJEEPO -:HYDi ]GH TENTLt ;_--__-- I DEPTH i KIND :MONTHS 'DEPTH:HARDNESS :DEPTH IHARDNESS IINIT. !TOTAL IGRPI FROST f t__ER€9ilEL1E1__-_.QLaAILS11L_IL'III'lltiS_I_LETK _� _--_? f(IN2_L_—----- _tINL_3--_____LSIN)_:(IN)_I_--I_ACTION_: 1-21.0 �_—�L L�--3--------->_fi9--L-------L--=-- ~---L--L--Eou---t CONSTEUf�TI�N_N�4TERIAL___�___ .-.~ -_---_-_ 1 0-15%: SEVERE. -POOR FILTER tl 1 0-15%: GOOD ' !SEPTIC TANK ! 15+%: SEVERE -POOR FILTER.SLOPE it ! 15-25%: FAIR -SLOPE 1 1 ABSORPTION 1 I1 ROADFILL t f t FIELDS t =! 1 0-7%: SEVERE -SEEPAGE II 1 PROBABLE SEWAGE 1 7+%: SEVERE-SEEPAGE.SLOPE It I LAGOON !t SAND f I AREAS II . —___TOLL------ ------ --- —------ ? 0-15%: SEVERE-SEEPAGE,TOO SANDY it i PROBABLE i SANITARY i 15+%: SEVERE-SEEPAGE,SLOPE,TOR SANDY It I LANDFILL i ' (TRENCH) 1 •----_-----L--_____-_-____-__ _~TOOT__-___-..__ _�._-_----__�-_-_____TONE--- ___~-__-_• 1 i 0-15X' SEVERE -SEEPAGE it S 0-15X: POOR -SHALL STONES,AREA RECLAIM i SANITARY ? 15+%: SEVERE-SEEPAGE.SLOPE ?i i 15+%: POOR -SMALL STONES,AREA RECLAIM,SLOPE LANDFILL I It TOPSOIL ? : (AREA) t it ' ---~-----;--------------------------TOOT---~_--- tl--_-__-~--_--------______-_--------__-__-___--_• 1 . POOR-SEEPAGE,TOO SANDY,SMALL STONES t DAILY 1 • 1-_~__~__-_-_-_..__CATER MAiJA�EMf,NT _---_------ 1 COVER FOR 1 iS 1 0-8%: SEVERE -SEEPAGE LANDFILL 1 11 POND ? 8+%: SEVERE-SFEPAGE,SLOPE -- ? 11 RESERVOIR I 11 AREA I BUILQIN6 SITE DEVEI DEMENT _-- t 1-_-j_---_----__-_ ' --_-_-----__t- D-I5X' • TOOT-----_-_--__ i SEVERE-CUTDANKS CAPE i! : SEVERE -SEEPAGE : SHALLOW 1 15+%'. SEVERE-CUTDANKS CAVE,SLOPF tIEMBANKMENTS 1 i 1EXCAVATIONS t It DIKES AND I ! LEVEES t t ---- ------------ ----------------- ___ SLIGHT 11 I SEVERE -NO WATER t : DWELLINGS 1 B-15%: MODERATE -SLOPE 11 EXCAVATED ? i WITHOUT 1 15+X: SEVERE -SLOPE It PONDS I ? BASEMENTS I !:AQUIFER FED I '-------i---------------~-----------_LI------ I------------- 1 1 O-BX: SLIGHT SS t DEEP TO WATER ? 1 DWELLINGS ! 8-15%: MODERATE -SLOPE tl 1 WIT4 1 15+%: SEVERE -SLOPE DRAINAGE i ! I BASEMENTS 'I ! i L__---_-------_—___----__— �_--_--_ _---- ---------- —----- --------__—_ 0-4%: SLIGHT IS 1 0-3% L: DROUGHTY SMALL 1 4-8%: MODERATE -SLOPE 1i i 3+% L:'DROUGHTY,SLOPE : COMMERCIAL ! 8+%: SEVERE -SLOPE iI IRRIGATION i 0-3X SL.COSL: DROUGHTY.SOIL BLOWING . : BUILDINGS t 3+% SL.COSL: DROUGHTY.SOIL BLOWING.SLOPE 1 • 1: ---------- 0-8%: SLIGHT I1 I 0-8% L: TOO SANDY t LOCAL : 8-15%: MODERATE -SLOPE it TERRACES 1 8+1 L: SLOPE.TOO SANDY 1 ROADS AND i 15+%: SEVERE -SLOPE 11 AND ; 0-8% SL,COSL: TOO SANOY,SOIL BLOWING STREETS It DIVERSIONS ! 8+% SL.COSL: SLOPE,T00 SANDY,SOIL BLOWING I LAWNS. ! 0-8X: MODERATE -DROUGHTY it I 0-SX: DROUGHTY : !LANDSCAPING : 8-15%: MODERATE-DROUGHTY,SLOPE GRASSED 1 8+%. SLOPE.DROUGHTY f AND GOLF 1 15+%: SEVERE -SLOPE tl WATERWAYS I f FAIRWAYS !i 1 _----___-� ---~--_-_-_---- LL___~-_' ! __-___-TOOT-_--__� -�_-----TOOT___~-_-_-__- __—_--____—_ REjIQNJ :PASTURE : 0-12%: GROUP 3 t SAND S 12-25%:GROUP 10 !HAYLAND I --------- ------- -------- i ESTHERVILLE SERIES MN0025 __---__------ —------- R E C R E A T I ON A L D E V E L OP M E N T____w�_—_—_____—__—_— --------- —_—_ : G-PX: SLIGHT IS : 0-2X' MODERATE -SMALL STONES MODERATE -SLOPE it t 2-6%: MODERATE-SLOPE*SMALL STONES i CAMP AREAS 1 15•%: SEVERE -SLOPE !:PLAYGROUNDS 1 6+%: SEVERE -SLOPE It -------- ----------------------------i------- 0-8X SLIGHT--------0-15X: SLIGHT------------- --------- ---t 1 8-15%: MODERATE -SLOPE it PATHS 1 15-25%: MODERATE -SLOPE !PICNIC AREAS! 15•%: SEVERE -SLOPE 1. AND I! , 11 TRAILS, I I i—--------------- ----------- —__—_--__—_st_______—_— __ _____ _ CAPABILITY ANC_YIELOS PER_ACRE_OF CROPS AND_PARTURE— (HIGHOE](EL MANAGEMENT)_____—�,—______—_—_ S CAPA- I CORN I SOYBEANS I OATS I GRASS- ! KENTUCKY IBROMEGRASS-: DETERMINING I BILITY 1 :LEGUME HAY i BLUEGRASS : ALFALFA I PHASE (TONS)„__ ---- LLH2--_f__-SAUM1_--- ----- ------ ___—__1NIRgilBgs_Hang_�I0is_ aSR_1BRs_�IB�11@gs_ IH3_lI@Fs_Ml 1RR�iNZRR-_IRR. INIRR :IRR=_: :0-2% ! 3S f 1 _0 1 17 1 40 t 1 2.0 1 1 2.0 t ! 3.0 t i 1 I :2-6% 3S 45 f 15 1 1 35 t 1 2.0 I 2.0 1 1 2.5 1 1 ! :0-6% ERODED 3S 40 1 12 1 1 30 1 1 1.8 1 1.8 1 1 2.2 1 1 I 1 t 4S 1 1 30 S 10 I 1 30 1 .1 1.5 1 1 1.5 1 1 2.5 1 1 1 1 16-12% ERODED 4S I • 27 1 1 9 1 29 1 t 1.4 : { 1.2 1 1 2.0 :6-12% SEV ER 6S I I - I I - I - I I - :I?-IP% 16S 1 t 1.5 1 1 1.5 1 1.9 1 1 t !12-19% ERODED i 6S - - i - 1.4 S t 1.2 t 2.0 • ! I ! !12-25% SEV ER 16S ! ! - i i - I 1 - I I - i - I :18-25% 6S 1 - i I- i - 1 t t 1.0 1 1 1.8 1 1 t 1 118-25X ERODED 6S t ------------ —------- -----------1---------?---;'---;1-----1-----1-----1-----5-----'-----1-----'-----s-----------I _--- CLASS PRQj�EMS----S—_EQLLNI.LAJ. QQiiEIIYLIY----S S DETERMININGISYM{EROSONIEGUIP.ISEEDL.IWINOTHSPLANT I COMMON TREES :SITESPROD: TREES TO PLANT I -__IHAZARDILIE"•IT IMORTOYiHAZAg0iSc4.NPE?I__-__----------LH�.iSIELaS�---------______________S _ i tI NONE I 1 ► i ' t 1 -------' --� -------------------- ----------- ------------------------- ------------ ----------- ___1+IHQQREAL�S—SBL_---------------- ---------------------------------------- ------------------------ tELBSS=QEIEflMly_•E ►' IASEi---_-O------ $EEE?E_`'..... —_kTI ,HIGH PPT !EASTERN REDCEDAR :151HONEYLOCUST 1221JACK PINE lSRIEASTERN WHITE PINE 1261 ,GREEN ASH 1201LILAC :R ISIBERIAN PEASHRUP 17 IP,USSTAN-OLIVE 116: ITATARIAN HONEYSUCKLEIB !RED PINE 116:AUSTRIAN PINE 1201SIBERIAN ELM :20f !LOW PPT !EASTERN REDCEDAR !8 !ROCKY MT. JUNIPER 18 IPONDEROSA PINE 1131PUSSTAN-OLIVE 1151 • !SIBERIAN ELM 1251 ! ! , ! 1 i ---s-------__------�---=- - 1----------------- WILDLI-'�-- _-------------------- --- -' --_-- --------- FE HABITAT SUIITBI.Lily AB ---- --------- --'----- -------------------- CLdS., 1_____POTENTIAL_FOR_HITAT ELEMENTS—_______E___POTENTIAL_AS_HQHjTAT DETERMINING {GRAIN BtGRASS BI WILD iHARDWO ICONIFER:SHRUBS iWETLANDISHALLOW!OPENLD :WOODLD :WETLAND:RANGELD: PHASE _ , SEED_ 7LESUME_! HERE= _ -! EELS LANTS_,-_____IPLANTS __E_WATER_,�JIEDLFSWjLHEF _J�TLI�LE_ikLLQ4E_� 10-12Y. —___. 1 FAIR : FAIR { FAIR 1 FAIR I FAIR i - IV. POORiV. POORI FAIR I FAIR IV. POOR! - 112-25X 1 POOR ! FAIR I FAIP I FAIR I FAIR I - IV. POORIV. POORI POOP t FAIR IV. POOR, - I --------------------- POTENTIAL NATIVE PLANT COMMI,LNTTY )RANGELAND OPEOREST_ITNgEgSTQRY VEEETATIO_1__— ----------- --____ ! i PLANT ! PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION (DRY WEIGHT) _LY_CLASS DETERMTN1Nf-_PHASE f COMMON PLANT NAME I SYMBOL t t' t _----__�s__—------- ----------____ ______________ i• t i 1 S t t s ' t 1 Mw-------------- !----------- I POTENTIAL PRODUCTION 1LBS./AC. DRY WT1: - FAVORABLE YEARS = NORMAL YEARS , ' �-""` ____-UN F A V O R A RLE Y EAR SFOOTNOTES T N O T E S —_--_�—_____ ------------- t—__-_--____ t ------- --- A ESTIMATES OF ENGINEERING PROPFRTIES BASED ON TEST DATA OF 3 PEDONS FROM STEELE COUNTY9 MINNESOTA. B WINDBREAK GROUP 7 �MN0026 S L I N T E R P R E T A T I 0 N S R E C 0 MLRA(S): °0. 103s 104 GLFNCOE FEE IE� REV. ARG-ELP. 7-P2 J CUMULIC HAPLAOUOLLS♦ FINE-LOAMYy MIXED♦ MESIC THE GLENCOE SERIES CONSISTS OF DEEP• VERY POORLY DRAINED SOILS FORMED IN GLACIAL TILL ON DEPPESSIONS AND SWALES IN THE UPLANDS. THE SURFACE SOIL IS BLACK AND VERY DARK GRAY CLAY LOAM 35 INCHES THICK. THE SUBSOIL IS OLIVE -GRAY MOTTLES` LOAM 13 INCHES THICK. THE SUBSTRATUM IS GRAYISH BROWN AND LIGHT OLIVE BROWN LOAM. SLOPES .ARE LESS THAN 1 PERCENT. CROPLAND IS THE MAIN USE. _—_-------- —-- - ------LMIAIL-ULL_PROPERLLLI------------------------------------------1 I EPTV1! 1 I IFP.ACTIPERCLNT OF MATERIAL LESS ILIQUID IoLAS- I I(iN.)i USDA TEXTURE t UNIFIED I AASHTO 1>3 INI�tiApta:�g,�,�jg@_SjF�YE_NCt LIMIT 1TICITYI I 0-35ISICL. CL. L IOL9 OH• MH. ML fA-69 A-7 1 0 195-100 QO-100 75-100 60-90 1 30-55 I10-95 I 135-4811-9 CL• SICL ICL IA-69 A-7 1 0 195-100 90-100 75-100 60-90 f 30-50 11"-15 1 148-601Lt CL ICLv ML IA-69 A-7 1 0 190-100 85-100 60-95 55-75 1 30-50 110-20 I ------ tOEPTHICLAY (MOIST BULKI PERMEA- I AVAILABLE 1 SOIL I SALINITY I SHRINK- IEROSIONIWIND !ORGANICS CORROSIVITY I 1(IN.)1(PCT)I DENSITY 1 BILITY )WATER CAPACITYIREACTIONI(MMHOS/CM)f SWELL IE&LIQUIEROD.IMATTER I ________________I I___1___1_SS1tGt±IlL__LiI)1Lflfl1—L_—itHLLyL�1—LEAL__LL:I;EL__1S2y�Ell[ I 1 0-35125-3511.35-1.45 1 0.2-2.0 1 0.18-0.22 16.1-7.8 1 - {MODERATE 1.281 5 1 6 1 5-10 1 )SIGH 1 135-48125-3511.35-1.50 1 0.2-2.0 —I —LOW 1 0.15-0.19 16.6-7.8 I - IMODERATE 1.281 1 1 IF 148-60122-3211.35-1.50 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.15-0.19 17.4-7.8 1 - t LOW 1.281_—L____1 ! I I 1 I I I ! t I 1 1 3 t ! I 1 ! I 1 tt I _-------1-----1--- ---1 ---1 ----1-------1---j-------------------------------- 1 FLOODING I ---- U19H KER-INLEI_cOUIEp_PAS_1 ---- &2.19C16 ---- 1—MU € IPE_IHYDIP! TENTILI I ----- —_----�_—__---___1 DFPTH ! KIND IMONTHS IDEPTH IHARDNESS IDEPTH IHARDNESSIINIT.ITOTALIGRPI FROST I {_-LELUEUY I_ DURATION IMONTHS I 1 (Id1_i----t_S1ML1----_Ji1NL1SI�lZJ---t_a�li�y_t I_ N0NE:$AU_J— 1 1 ♦1-1.DIAPPARENTIOCT-JUNt --j__--_a_26L_L—_—_y___1_—__ -- --` 11ASLFASLI:I<IRKA----- ZIAL_ _---_- 1--- 1 SEVERE-PERCS SLOWLY9PONDING it I POOR-WETNESS.LOW STRENGTH ! [SEPTIC TANK 1 It f 1 1 ABSOIPTION ! It ROADFILL I I I FIELDS I !1 f 1 I 1 SEVERE-PONDING it I IMPROBABLE -EXCESS FINES— 1 1 SEWAGE 1 to I I I LAGOON t it SAND I I I AREAS I it. I ! 1 I SEVERE-PONDING9EXCESS HUMUS II 1 IMPROBABLE -EXCESS FINES I I SANITARY 1 11 1 t I LANDFILL t it GRAVEL t 1 1 (TRENCH) 1 It 1 t 1 t SEVERE-PONDINGw 11 1 POOR -WETNESS —1 I SANITARY 1 11 1 1 f LANDFILL t It TOPSOIL I 1 t (AREA) t It 1 t 1 I POOR-PONDINGOHARD TO PACK It I DAILY I If____— t COVER FOR I It I.MODER-ATE-SEEPAGE 1 I LANDFILL I It POND --tI RESERVOIR I I 11 AREA I 1 ---------@lI1LpItI�aIIE�EYEL2e!lEIIL__--_—_--_LII ------ .-1_t__—------ —----- --------------------- — t f 1 SEVERE-PONDING it I SEVERE -HARD TO PACKgEXCESS HUMUS.PONDING I I SHALLOW t IIEMBANKMENTS I 1 (EXCAVATIONS 1 11 DIKES AND I t 1 1 It LEVEES 1 f t t NONE: SEVERE-PONDINGrLOW STRENGTH It I SEVERE -SLOW REFILL— t I DWELLINGS I RARE: SEVERE-FLOODING9PONOING9LOW STRENGTH. It EXCAVATED I t I WITHOUT 1 1t PONDS ' I t I BASEMENTS I f1AGUIFER FED I I ______1____—_--__—_ _ it I t NONE: SEVERE-PONDING If I FROST ACTION9PONDING I t DWELLINGS I RARE: SEVERE-FLOODING9PONDING 11 i I 1 .IITH 1 If DRAINAGE I 1 1 BASEMENTS I it I t I-------- --- 1_---_---------------------- ------------1t------- 1 -_--- ---_ I f NONE: SEVERE-PONOING9LOW STRENGTH It I PONDING I SMALL t RARE: SEVERE-FLOODINGvPONDINGgLOW STRENGTH If I 1 I COMMERCIAL I ([.IRRIGATION 1 t I BUILDINGS I 11 t 1 ---- ! I SEVERE-PONDINGOLOW STRENGTHrFROST ACTION 11. t PONDING I I LOCAL ! 11 TERRACES I 1 I ROADS AND I It AND I 1 t STREETS I 11 DIVERSIONS 1 t _ I LAWNS• I SEVERE-PONDING If I WETNESS f (LANDSCAPING t 4 1= GRASSED I t t AND GOLF I It WATERWAYS 1 I I FAIRWAYS I II I I REGIONAL_LNTTEERPRETATIONS --_---1 (PASTT'URE AND I GROUP 6 IHAYLAND 1 t I I GLENCOE SERIES MN0026 ----------=------------------------------REULAII2NAL_2EYEL22@ENI-------------------------------------- 1 I NONE: SEVERE-PONDING 11 t SEVERE-PONDING 1 t I RARE: SEVERE-PONDINGtFLOODING It 1 1 I CAMP AREAS I 1IPLAYGROUNDS I t ------------------------ 1 1 SEVERE-PONDING it I SEVERE-PONDING i I 1 11 PATHS • I 1 1PICNIC AREASI II AND f I I It TRAILS I 1 '-------1------------------ —--------- ------11---------- —1_------------------------- '---------- _—_____—___—____cAaA13ILIIY_AN2_YIEL2S P€R Ems€oE_E32PS_ANp_PA�I3�R€—lL+I2H_L€YEL_L+9sI92€H€NT2-----____--------- I CLASS- I CAPA- I CORN I SOYBEANS I OATS I GRASS- ISROMEGRASS-1 REED 1 t I DETERMINING 1 BILITY t I I ILEGUME HAY I ALFALFA ICANARYGRASSI 1 t PHASE 11I@!!I__-1@!!I---- 1--- iBUI.... 1tTONSI_--1jAUMl--1---iAUMi---j—__-------I t___--______—------- —iNIRRIIEfl:iNlR�aiflfl:aNILB aIg@s_1NiHli_lI@8:_iNIHfl_lI@S, IN1L-lifla:aNIRB_1IRa�1NiEl t1RA__I 1DRAINED 13W 1 : 85 1 1 34 1 1 75 1 1.3..5 1. 1 5.2 1 i 5.5 1 1 1 r IUNDRAINED 1 6W I I i- 1' I- t 1- t I- 1 1 5.5 1 1 I ! t t 1 t i I t I '• t i t i ! ! f f i t I t 1 I t t 1 t I i 1 t I I I 1 t I t I 1 1 1 1 I I I t tt I 1 I 1 i I I t I 1 I t 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I r t I t i I t 1 _--------------- —1---1----1----a_��i----I-----1-----1-----1--- --J _--L---i---1----1-----1----' ------------------------------------1222 Np_IILIIA@ILIIY--------- '__ A N A M --"-------�---- —___ __________""1___SSE_ENI_PB2@LEL+�—_—_______•1�2IENIIAL2fl2Q!lE.IIYIIY_1 � s I DETERMINING I SYM I EROS1ONf EQUIP. ISEEDLINGI WINOTH.1 PLANT I COMMON TREES ISITEI TREES TO PLANT I I_------ CAMP.ETi,1____________________ilN2it!—_—_______---- ----' t f I 1 ! ! 1 I NONE I I I I ! 1 1 1 I ! ! t 1 ! t t I I I 1 I I I I I t 1 t f 1 I I I { ! t { t f { r I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ! 1 1 I 1 I I t f t I 1 i 1 t I t 1 I t 1 I 1 ! I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 t I 1 1 I t t 1 f 1 t I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 t t I 1 I I t 1 1 f 1 I t 1 f I 1 f t 1 t I C L A EL_QLILLI s" Ui' i_EMLL_____;:PEL1.EI_______iHIl__--$t=ES IEL____—irlL-----EPE€5------: H r r 16RAINED (BLACK WILLOW 1311BLACK ASH 1221GOLDEN WILLOW 1331REDOSIER DOGWOOD IR I 1 IWHITE WILLOW 1331TALL PURPLE WILLOW 1231 1 1 1 t r 1 I I 1 I 1 I 11 i t I I I I 1 1 1 1 r I I I i t I I I S r----- -------- --------1---------------1--1-----------------1--1----------------1--1--------------1--' ---------------------------------YIL2LIEE�IA � IIAI�I�IIA@ILIIL----------------------------------- 1 CLASS- I________________POTENTjAL_FOR_HA@IIAI_EL€@ENI§--_—_—__--_-- 1 __POIENIIAL_AS HA@ITA F_0 I I S1_-- i DETERMINING !GRAIN -lFwASS 61 WILD IHAROWD ICONIFERISHRUBS IWETLANDISHALLOWIOPENLD IWOODLD IWETLANDIRANGFLDI s_------ PHA _______1PLANILI_kAILR jjIILQLF 1uILnLF iL+IL2LF_L]LPLE_I TALL I GOOD I GOOD I FAIR i FAIR I FAIR I - I GOOD 1 GOOD f GOOD I FAIR I GOOD t - 1 t f 1 I t I 1 I 1 I f 1 i 1 1 f 1 1 ! 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 '------------------1------- �-------1---1------1------1-------1------1------1-------1-----1—__-1_----1 -- ----- POj€NjIA�NAIIi!E PLANT COM�I�11Y_LFUlF�LAND_Oe_�QflL$I_l�NQEa�I4�_YE _TAII�N1---------------- I I PLANT i—�EREENIn�E_�2M1:2�i7121a2Lly€I2lilt_@Y_ILA 2€IESU91N?HeJE______t I COMMON PLANT NAME 1 SYMBOL 1— I 1 1 1 i 1 1 ! 1 t I t 1 t 1 1 1 I t f I I t I I 1 1 I 1 I I I t I 1 1 f 1 t r I t r 1 1 1 1 I 1 I y I 1 1 I I t 1 1 1 i t t I 1 t 1 r t 1 1 l ! 1 t I i 1 1 1 I I 1 t t 1 t r I 1 1 r I POTENTIAL PRODUCTION (LBS./AC. DRY WT): I FAVORABLE YEARS I I 1 1 f f { NORMAL YEARS f I t I 1 ! FOOTNOTES 1 EXTENSIVE DIKING REQUIRED FOR STORAGE A WINDBREAK GROUP 2W M40060 S OI N T E R P R E T A T I O N S R E C 0 MLRA(S): 909 103, 91 HAYDEN SERVES REV. ELBS 6-84 TYPIC HAPLUDALFS, FINIE-LOAMY. MIXED* MESIC TIE HAYDEN SERIES CONSISTS OF DEEP WELL DRAINED SOILS FORMED IN GLACIAL TILL JNDER DECIDUOUS FOREST ON GROUND AND TERMINAL-ORA1NESi THE SURFACE LAYER IS VERY DARK GRAY LOAM 2 INCHES THICK. THE SUBSURFACE LAYER IS DARK GRAYISH BROWN LOAM 7 INCHES THICK. THE SUBSOIL IS BROWN AND YELLOWISH BROWN LOAM AND CLAY LOAM 34 INCHES THICK. THE SUPSTRATUM IS LIGHT OLIVE BROWN LOAM. SLOPES RANGE FROM I TO 50 PERCENT. AREAS ARE USED FOR CROPLAND* PASTURELAND AND WOODLAND. ----^---^-- ------ _ —y------------------- — ----- -- ------ ------------ -----------C-----------------T--O-OT---TO--O-T------_---------------!----T-O-O-TT---O-O-T--- - t lDEPTHI F MATERIAL LESS LIQUID :PLAS- I USDA TEXTURE UNIFIED t AASHTO 1>3 INS THAN 3" PASSING SIEVE_As_. LIMIT !TICITYI -----------------------------TOOT-- _A(P&I.Lt,4—_il�_t3�_iA42--_TOOT--ilA1QEX_ 1 0-9 IL. SIC. SCL :MLS CL-ML. CL :A-4. 1 D 1 Inc 98-100 85-98 50-80 1 20-30 1 4-1.0 t 0-q :FSLS SL ISMS SM-SCS SC !A-4 1 0 : 100 95-100 65-85 35-50 1 20-30 :NP-A 1 1 0-9 iCL ICL !A-7 1 0 195-1C0 90-100 8C-95 70-SO 1 40-50 .15-25 1 ! 9-43iCL9 L !CL IA-79 A-6 1 0 195-100 90-100 8C-95 55-75 1 30-50 115-26 I :43-60ILi SL. FSL :CL. SC :A-69 A-4 1 0-5 :95-100 90-100 75-90 35-70 1 20-35 : 8-15 1 1---s----- ---TOOT-� - --------- t---------------TOOT-- ; ------- t TOOT-- I iDEPTH:CLAY !MOIST BULK. PERMEA- I AVAILABLE 1 SOIL 1 SALINITY I SHRINK- IFROSIONIWIND IORGANICI C0RRDSIV17Y i .(IN.):tPCT)i DENSITY 1 P.ILITY !WATER CAPACITYIREACT10N1(MMHOS/CM)t SWELL IEAflUl :EROD.:MATTER t_ ___ ! 1L_i_ LL�MZ__tA?NLHR1__i___STNLL�1____t__SeLL__t_____--AeQILbLIlALi_IS_S I_t�Rsllei-seS�12___Z'.sEtE1 0-9 '10-2511.40-1.60 1 0.6-2.0 0.20-0.22 15.6-7.3 ! - LOW t.32i 5 : 6 1 .5-1 __L0�___tMODERAIEi 1 0-9 1 5-15!1.45-1.70 1 2.0-6.0 1 0.14-0.18 15.6-7.3 ! - ! LOW 1.32. 5 1 3 t .5-1 : 0-9 1128-3511.50-1.65 1 0.6-2.0 t 0.16-0.20 15.6-7.3 1 - iMODERATE 1.321 5_f _6__t.5_1 _: .9-43:18-3511.50-1.65 i 0.6-2.0 1 0.15-0.19 15.1-7.3 1 - iMUDERATE 1.321 143-60115-2711.65-1.80 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.14-0.19 17.4-8.4 1 - I LOW 1.32: ---t---_----__t--_—_—t_--t--- —--------- ------------------- __--�____ FLOODING i_ hSGH_WATER iAHLE i_CEMENTED_P9N___— BE�ROC�K-_--tSU�S1DENCE_iHYD1POTENT, Lt ! DEPTH i KIND !MONTHS !DEPTH!HARDNESS !DEPTH IHARDNESS'INIT. :TOTALIGRP! FROST . FREOUENCY _C___QURATION__ tMgNTH!_t-S.FTi__t-------- _—___—ISLNS_i_-_----A_ �--t---TOOT-i-�--i--=--:TOOT---�—-T—O_O_T_---_ __---TRY_FACILITIES__--_--___--_-__„--------__-_--__- CinTRUilla_MAEL-t-_S--.--LO_O—tT__--_R _ t-tA-n -o �-n -�-I5 -4A-RI- _D f !0_8%: MODERATE-PERCS SLOWLY fi t 0-15%: GOOD !SEPTIC TANK 1 8-15%: MODERATE-PERCS SLOWLYSSLOPE 11 : 15-25%: FAIR -SLOPE 1 ! ABSORPTION 115+%: SEVERE -SLOPE It ROADFILL t 25+%: POOR -SLOPE 1 I FIELDS ! 1 ----TOOT—_s-TOOT TOOT------TOOT---------------5 =---------------------------- — ---------- — ------- --- f 1 0-2%' MODERATE -SEEPAGE ii I IMPROBABLE. -EXCESS FINES : SEWAGE 1 2-7%: MODERATE-SEEPAGESSLOPE 1i 1 LAGOON 1 7+%: SEVERE -SLOPE 11 SAND t 1 t AREAS . IIi i i f-----------=TOOT—TOOT^--TOOT----TOOT--t-----------'--- ---- TOOT --TOOT- -------- ^-------- i 0-8%: MODERATE-T00 CLAYEY ii I IMPROBABLE -EXCESS FINES SANITARY ! 8-15%: MODERATE-SLOPE.TOO CLAYEY LANDFILL 1 15+%: SEVFRE-SLOPE It GRAVEL t (TRENCH) 1It ' f----------- "—--- --------- ----------------.----__--_tS------____r._---_—__—_--_'.TOOT..---MOOT--TONE----___-_ 1 1 0-8%: SLIGHT t! 1 0-RX LSSILiFSL.SL' FAIR -SMALL STONES t SANITARY 1 8-15%: MODERATE -SLOPE IS i B-15% LSSIL.FSL.SL: FAIR -SMALL STONES.SLOPE ! LANDFILL 1 15+%: SEVERE -SLOPE TOPSOIL 1 0-8% SCLSCL: FAIR -TOO CLAYEY.SMALL STONES I (AREA) I 1i 1 8-15% SCL.CL: FAIR -TOO CLAYEYSSMALL STONES 1 ---_ --- -1 --TOOT-_--t 15+%__POOR—SAP€ ------- —----------- ------- i t 0-8%: FAIR -TOO CLAYEY !t i DAILY : 8-15%: FAIR -TOO CLAYEY.SLOPE ::_____________------WATER_MANA6EMEI,�T.................... COVER FOR ' 15.1: POOR -SLOPE is 1 0-3%: MODERATE -SEEPAGE ! 1 LANDFILL 1 11 POND 1 3-8X: MODERATE-SEEPAGE*SLOPE i 'i RESERVOIR 1 B+X: SEVERE -SLOPE ' ' AREA I i -----^-------- U1L111.1r._�.1IF. DULUM-2i----------------tt-------- ---t------ —----------- ------ —----- — ----- ---1 1 0-BX: SLIGHT 11 I SLIGHT i 1 SHALLOW ! 8-15%: MODERATE -SLOPE :!EMBANKMENTS t ! :EXCAVATIONS 1 15+X: SEVERE -SLOPE 1 DIKES AND I ! I it LEVEES t i _;U F i 0-8%: MODERATE -SHRINK -SWELL i SEVERE -NO WATER } DWELLINGS 1 8-15%: MODERATE-SHRTNK-SWELL*SLOPE it EXCAVATED : i WITHOUT ! 15+%: SEVERE -SLOPE :1 PONDS ! I BASEMENTS. : ::AQUIFER FED I i —___1s---_—_____� t—________—____--_...�_---___----_--- __-_—__—_—MOOT---TOOT- • 1 0-8%: MODERATE -SHRINK -SWELL 1i I DEEP TO WATER 1 : DWELLINGS 18-15%: MODERATE-SLOPE.SHRINK-SWELL :i 1 WITH 1 15+%:. SEVERE -SLOPE 11 DRAINAGE I I BASEMENTS 1 :1 1 t_____------t------------TOOT--------------tt---------t---------------- -- ----------------- ----I I O-4%: MODERATE -SHRINK -SWELL li i 0-3X LiS]L*SCL.CL: FAVORABLE t 1 SMALL 1 4-8%: MODERATE-SHRINK-SWELLSSLOPE !1 1 3+% L.SIL*SCLiCL: SLOPE . ! COMMERCIAL 1 8+%: SEVERE-SLOPF :: IRRIGATION 1 0-3X FSLSSL: SOIL BLOWING t BUILDINGS t it 1 3+1 FSL.SL: SOIL BLOWING.SLOPE ! .. ------------------- ------- -------»»-------_--t—_----.--_--�-"TOOT----_-_----------- TOOT-- 0-I5%' SEVERE -LOW STRENGTH ! 1 0-8% L.SILSSCL.CL: FAVORABLE I LOCAL t 15+%: SEVERE -LOW STRENGTH.SLOPE !f TERRACES 18+% L*SILSSCL*CL: SLOPE 1 t ROADS AND 1 It AND t 0-8% FSLSSL: SOIL BLOWING } STREETS 1 :1 DIVERSIONS ' 8+% FSL.SL: SLOPE*SOIL BLOWING 1 I-- I— --- —-------- ----------- —___,—_--tt-------_—t------- ---------------- -------------------1 I LAWNS: I O-8%: SLIGHT 1t 1 0-81: FAVORABLE : ILANDSCAPING t 8-15%: MODERATE -SLOPE : 1 GRASSED. 1 8+%: SLOPE f I AND GOLF : 15+%: SEVERE -SLOPE It WATERWAYS I : I FAIRWAYS I it ! I--------t—------- -----------------------------tS----------------- --------- ----------------------- ------ t ---------__—__REGIONAL_INTERPRETATION6----- M__—__W :PASTURE AND t 0-i8%: GROUP 1 1 IHAYLAND 1 18-252: GROUP 2 2 } 1 25+%: GROUP 8 f--------------------'----••---_—_--_••_MOOT____—____•-.! MN0060 HAYDEN SERIES -------------- --------- ------- ------ -----------------------------RELRFATLDNAL_QEYELQPIEN1-------- ------------ 0-8 SLIGHT :I 0-2%: SLIGHT 1 I : 8-15%: MODERATF-SLOPE 1 2-E.%: MODERATE -SLOPE CAMP AREAS 1 15+%'SEVERE-SLOPE ;!PLAYGROUNDS ' 6+1: SEVERE -SLOPE S1 ----- -- '---------------------------------- 1 ! 0-BY: ----------------------- ---- -------------� __-_----------------- SLIGHT .. 1 0-15%: SLIGHT 1 8-15%: MOCFRATE-SLOPE PATHS ' 15-25Y: MODERATE -SLOPE !PICNIC AREAS! 15+%: SEVERE -SLOPE AND 1 25+%: SEVERE -SLOPE it TRAILS ' ------------ -'--------- cA?AUL1L7AM1Q-YTELQa-PF.B_AFRG_4E_UPE"NQ-P ZIURE__Stil&tL-LULL-?AINAkUEtti2-------------------- --- ---------- ----- CLASS- I CAPA- I CORN I SOYPEANS ! OATS 1 GRASS- IBROMEGRASS-1 KENTUCKY ! ' DETERMINING I BILITY I i [LEGUME HAY 1 ALFALFA I BLUEGRASS t 1 ! PHASE ! : foul tBU) _! i�LL-_-_L_STONSI... i... iAUMj-- !__-SAU_,Z---------------: --- ---- 5----^------------ _�_�.--------------_ ',IRR. tNIRR IIRR. :NIRR :IRR. INjRR_ijP.R=_iNjRR_]IRR_ i -_-----------------------_-.._-_- lNIFR RR. t ------------. 10-6X __tNIRRIIRR_iNTRR__7RR._INIRP 1 2E I 1112 : 1 35 1 1 76 i 1 4.5 t 6.5 : ! 3.5 12-6% ERODED : 2E t 1 110 1 1 34 1 1 74 1 14.3 I 1 6.5 1 1 3.5 1 t 1 1 :6-12% t 3E 1 1 108 t 1 33 1 1 72 S t 4.2 : 1 6.5 1 1 3.5 1 t 1 1 16-12% ERODED 1 3E : 1103 1 ! 31 ; 1 68 1 4.0 i 1 6.0 : 1 3.G I I :6-12X SEV ER 14E 1 1 85 1 t 20 1 1 50 1 1 3.4 s 1, 4.8 i t 2.5 1 1 112-19% : 4E I 1 98 1 1 30 1 1 68 t 1 3.8 1 1 6.0 1 1 3.0 !12-18% ERODED 14E 1 : 95 1 1 30 1 60 I 13.8 1 1 5.2 S 1 3.0 t t t ! 118-24% 1 6E I ;- i I- i - 1 i 3.0 1 1 4.5 S t 3.0 118-24% ERODED t 6E 1 ! - 1 - : : - 1 1 3.0 1 : 4.5 2.0 1 ! ! 112-24% SEV ER 6E 1 - i 1 - ! 1 - i ! - f t - - : I S i 1 1 124-50% 7E - - - - ! 1 1.5 1 Ij3=U% CRODLP---------- -L_ _i---1--=-1-----1 - ! - s ---t -=------!__------- t-1=5-S ----_----------- LIABILITY _---------------- ----- --------------------- -----------_---------------------------1d42D1A[4p_ CLASS- :ORDINANAGEMENTOROHLEnS__-_____t�_PQIENLIALARSQl1LTIYILY_____1 1 I DETERMINING SSYMIEROS•NtEOUIP.:SfEDL.IWINDTHIPLANT COMMON TRFES ISITEIPRODI TREES TO PLANT i --_:HAZARD:LIMIT_iMORT_YIHAZARDtCOMPETI______r____-______iINDXICLASS_______________________1 _____. i 4AISLIGHTISLIGHTiSLIGHTISLIGHTISLIGHTINORTHERN RED OAK 169 1 4 !BLACK WALNUT f i2-15% 115-35% t 4RiMODER.IMOOER.!SLIGHTISLIGHT:SLIGHTIAMER.ICAN BASSWOOD :69 1 3 :NORTHERN RED OAK 135+X 14R*SEVERE:SEVEREISLIGHTISLIGHTISLTGHTISUGAR MAPLE I SAMERICAN BASSWOOD i 1 :BLACK WALNUT 162 ! !SILVER MAPLE i (EASTERN WHITE PINE :64 1 9 IWHITF. OAK i I 1 f 1 !WHITE OAK 162 3 3 t t i ' t-------------------------i----i----------------------1 ---------------------=- -'----i ------------s------=----- WTNDBREAKS__t1=i------------- ---------- ---- --------------- _ 1CLASS=DETERwIN•G PHASES SPECIES_-- tHTi-___SP_ECIES ------- ____ SPECIES -------- 1HT:-____SPECIES_______!Hit !ALL (EASTERN WHITE PINE 130:GREEN ASH 1281HACKBERRY 125iEASTERN REDCEDAR 116: 1REOOSIER DOGWOOD :12!RUSSIAN-OLIVE 1251AMUR MAPLE :211GRAY DOGWOOD I12i ISTBERIAN PEASHRUB 1101LILAC 1131NORTHERN WHITE-CEDAR1161BLUE SPRUCE :221 i. 1 I 1 1 i i----_----------------_' _ - - t t-------------------=-----------___.--___' --------------- vILF€ HATITAT SUITABILITY ------ ------ - --------- ------------------ CLASS- P3LL.111LAI.-E4R-tf.fSQLLALELECI.E�YIS__..____-------___POT€NTIAL_AS_HABITAT FOR____! ,GRAIN 'WOODI_D DETERMINING _ &!GRASS &t WILD lHARDWD SCONIFERISHRUBS IWETLANDISHALLOWIOPENLD IWETLANDIRANGELOI j SEED_ ILEG_UME_t_HERB__i TREES_;PLANTS_'-_-_-_ Pt LANTS_i WATER_IWIL^LF-iWILDLF _VILDLF_IW111..DLF 1 I2-6% - 1 GOOD i GOOD t GOOD 1 GOOD I GOOD - IV. POORIV. POOR! G000 : GOOD IV. POOR[ - l6-18% i FAIR i GOOD cooe : GOOD I GOOD 1 - IV. POOR!V. POOR! GOOD 1 GOOD IV. POORI - 1 118+% 1 POOR i FAIR i GOOD 1 GOOD 1 GOOD 1 - 1V. POOPIV. POOR! FAIR 1 GOOD IV. POOR] - t I t I t=-------i--____-i----_---------�----�_I '---------- ------- ------- --___-___-- POTENTIAL NATIVE_PLANT COHMIENITY (RANGELANQ_OR_FOREST_ll_NQF.RSTQRY VEGET0.jTDN2_-----_-------__-_-_ ---------------- _ 1 : PLANT _ PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION IQRY W€j3CHT1_BY_ELASS DETERMINTN¢_PHASE______i ; --�---- -M--- - - 1 COMMON PLANT NAME i SYMBOL !_! ] ----------i_iNLPN)- __--------i-------------i-----------i-------------i------------ i 1 f 1 s 1 i l f t 1 ! s 1 s + s s s , ------- ! ---T--------------------------i--------------------------- --------------------------=----- ; POTENTIAL PRODUCTION (LBS./AC. DRY WI): !__-_-______-_____ _-.---____---------------- --' FAVORABLE YEARS I I NORMAL YEARS i 1 -------_-_--------------------_---i-----_--_---_ UNFAVO B E YEARS _'_ ' _-------- -------------_-R__---_------------- FOOTNOTES BASED ON TEST DATA OF 7 PEDONS. WINDFREAK GROUP 3. SITE INDFX IS A SUMMARY OF 5 OR MORE MEASUREMENTS ON THIS SOIL. • MN0073 S O I L 5 U R V E Y I N T E R P R E T A T I 0 N S / MLPA(S): 103. 56. 57. 102. 104. 106• BB. 90 J� APG.ELB, 12-73 MARSH AOUENTS AND HISTOSOLS MARSH CONSISTS OF UNDRAINED DEPRESSIONS. SHALLOW LAKES. AMC) PONDS. THEY ARE VERY POORLY -DRAINED AND CONTAIN WATER MOST OF THE YEAR. THESE AREAS ARE COVERED BY REEDS. SEDGES, AND RUSHES, WITH SOME AREAS OF OPEN WATER. THE SOIL MATERIAL HAS NDT 13EEN CLASSIFIED. BUT IS COMMONLY PEATY MUCK* I-- --— TIMATESOIL DROEaT---(AjJDEPTHI—_-__— ---_-------_-_---- -------------_-- _1 I IFRACTIPERCENT OF MATERIAL LESS ILIOUID IPLAS- I I(IN.11 USDA TEXTURE 1 UNIFIED 1 AASHTO 1>3 INI THAM_3' PAILLU SIEVE bWa -I LIMIT (TICITYI 1 0-601vAa 1 I I I 1 1 r I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I i i I 1 I I - L-- '--1---L--------- 1----I--_— JDEPTHJPERMEABILITYI AVAILABLE I SOIL I SALINITY J SHRINKr ( CORROSIVITY IEROSIONIWIND I I(IN.)1 (IN/HR) IMATER CAPACITYIREACTIONI(MMHOS/CMII SWELL ( _—IEAGI0851ERCD.1 Imo+ L^� 1 (IN/tta i (PHI —I (DDrW, IA 1 ATFeL--1snSILeEIE1_K_1_Z_1S,aGuel 1 0-601 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I FLOODING I HIGH WAICA TA8LP 1 L"'EI+TEQ_2AIl_1_--flEDR OCK ISUBSIDENCE IHYDIPOTENTOLI DEPTH J KIND IMONTHS IDEPTHIHARDNESSIDEPfH IHARDNESSIINIT.ITOTALIGRPI FROST I �.Sn,>z•as.•'-•,uS I ( SEVERE -WET Ness. FLOODS sQStase_rlelealeL__._— _ __ I —' (SEPTIC TANK J I POOR -WETNESS 1! I 1 I ABSORPTION J I ROADFILL ( I FIELDS I --_-1—_--------------------------- 1 1 SEVERE -WETNESS II 1 UNSUITED I I SEWAGE I II I 1 LAGOON J II SAND I I I J AREAS J II I I I SEVEPE-WE TNESS•FLOODs — IJ I UNSUITED -- -- I I SANITARY J II 1 1 LANDFILL I I II' GRAVEL I I 1 4TRENCHi J 11 1 r I I SEVERE-WETNESS.FLOODS II I POOR -WETNESS I I SANITARY J 1t 1 I I LANDFILL J - II TOPSOIL ( I i I (APEA)If I 1_--�_ r It — ----------------- I I POOR -WETNESS ---1 11 DAILY I COVER FOR J LANDFILL i 11 1 II POND I 11 RESERVOIR II AREA 1 �SOMMUNS TY DEVELOPMENT I I SEVERE-WETNE.S.FLOODS 11 1 1 () I SHALLOW I ((EMBANKMENTS I (EXCAVATIONS I iI.DIKES AND 1 1 I II LEVEES i I I SEVERE-WETNESS•FLOODS II I FAVORABLE I DWELLINGS J II EXCAVATED WITHOUT I JI PONDS I .. 1 BASEMENTS 1 IIAGUIFIER FEDI. I I SEVERE-WETNESS.FLOODS JI 1 WETNESS.POOR OUTLETS —_ I DWELLINGS I II 1 WITH I JJ DRAINAGE ( EASEMENTS I 11 1 I I SEVERE-WETNESS•FLOODS JJ J ----- SMALL J II I 1 COMMERCIAL I II IRRIGATION I BUILDINGS JIf 111-- I I SEVERE-WETNESS.FLOODS ------ --------- -- ------ —__---___ JJ I NOT NEEDED I LOCAL I II TERRACES 1 I ROADS AND ( If AND I I STREETS J II DIVERSIONS I 1�----1----------- 11---1___----------------------�____ 1 LAWNS. I II I NOT NEEDED. ILANDSCAPING ( II GRASSED I I AND GOLF J If WATERWAYS I FAIRWAYS I II I RE GIDMAL 2NTERPRET�T10Nf IPASTURE AND I GROUP Al I IHAYLAND I J I I J I-------- I — I MN00T3 QEGQEATI ON _ __ ( ! SEVERE -WETNESS 11 1 SEVERE -WETNESS I CAMP AREAS ( IIPLAYGROUNDS I I I 11 I -----1---------- ---- I I SEVERE-VETNESS tI I SEVERE -WETNESS I 1 11 PATHS I (PICNIC AREASI if AND I I I It TRAILS 1 1 1 1 I I t I I CAPARTi-ITY C,TE,Q-YjELQS —---------------- —--- -------- -------------- -- GROPS AND PAAlUef--Lbl— UYU MAN 69.041ENj1_— ---- 1— CLASS- I CAP^- I I I I I I 1 I DETERMINING I BILITY 1 I I ( 1 I I 1 PHASE I 1 I 1 _1—_—_---1---------1-- ---1— --1 INIRRIIRR.INIRR IIRR. INIRR EIRR. INIRR IIRB�_ltliE13_liABA_iiy18E_1tfiBa-JLNIA81IRBA INIRR IIRR. I I ALL I ow 1 1 I I I t I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 ( 1 I t l I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I t 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 f I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 i I I i 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 f 1 1 I I 1 1 I f i 1 I 1 1 1 VDOOLAND SUITABILITY I CLASS- IORDI MWAGC ANT PROBLEMS 1 aalLujjAL PEQRAKIIYIIY_-I I I DETERMINING ISYMI EROSION) EQUIP. ISEEOLINGI VINOTH.1 PLANT ( IMPORTANT TREES ISITEI TREES TO PLANT I I_--- PHASE 1 1 HAZARD I LIMIT 1 MORT W. 1._ HAZARD _1 t 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I i 1 1 1 I I I I t I 1 1 I ( 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I NONE I d I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I i 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 i I I I I I I I 1 1 I ( 1 i 1 I I I i I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 t 1 i 1 I I 1 1 i I I 1 I 1 1 I ----1------------- —--- 1----1------ —------ -----I IQLdSS_REIEEMIN*G PHASEI SPECIES IHTI SPECIES IHTI SPECjEg t 1 NONE I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I F 1 I 1 I 1 i • 1 1 1 I 1 f I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I --------- 1-- I 1 t--1--------------------1--1--------------=1--1 ri OLIFE H eI TAT SUITABILITY I CLASS- _ PT _ - A-HARI_ IAT_ FOR:-1 1 DETERMINING IGRAIN GIGRASS 91 WILD IMARDro IC(ONIFERIS H3UBS (WETLANDISHA{.LOVIOPENLO IWOODLD IWETLANDIRAW6ELDI ( PHASE I SFFED 1. LEGIeE I HERB, I TREES I ;S 1--leLam-i-YSjER i W1u, Lfaw ILDLF 1 W ILDLF 1 W IL2Lfr-_i TALL IV. POORIV. P00RIV. POORIV. POOPIV. POORI - I GOOD I GOOD IV. POORIV. POORI GOOD I - I I i 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 ( 1 1 I I t 1 1 f 1 1 I I_ __—r.--- I I —1 I I 1—1------1-------1-------1-------1------�1_____— I COM POTENTIAL MA' PLANT MUNITY j$�t EL8N0 OR FQE6SI_SINQEASIGBY_YESIEIA22Qtll�_____---__— I_---_ ( PLANT I PERCENTAGE COMPOSI7IDy_A.Q6X-XFU: l) BY_LLASS DETERMINING PMASe----f 1 COMMON PLANT NAME I SYMBOL ( I I I I I 1----------- 1--------------1 1---------_— I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I 1 ( I 1 t I 1 1 I ( I I I I I 1 1 I i I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 t i I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I i 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 t t I 1 I 1 1 I --------1-------------L---------1----- -----1 t POTENTIAL PRODUCTION (LBS./AC. DRY WTII I FAVORABLE YEARS I NORMAL YEARS 1 I ( I I 1 UNFAVORABLE YEAA3 FOOTNOTE3 A ESTIMATED SOIL PROPERTIES ARE TOC VARIABLE TO RATE. 1 TOO VARIABLE TO RATE. r � _ REGULAR CHANHASSEN CIT yOUNCIL MEETING June 3, 1985 Mayor Hamilton called the meeting to order. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. Members Present Councilman Horn, Councilman Geving, Councilwoman Watson, and Councilwoman Swenson Members Absent None Staff Present Don Ashworth, Barbara [lacy, and Bill Monk APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Councilwoman Watson moved to approve the agenda as presented with the addition of discussion in regards to a street light at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Highway 17. Motion was seconded by Councilwoman Swenson. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Watson and Swenson, Councilmen Horn and Geving. No negative votes. Motion carried. CONSENT AGENDA_ Councilwoman Watson moved to approve the following Consent Agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: a. Final P1a"ooroval Chestnut Ridge Sixth Addition and Trappers Pass. c. R OLUTION #85-24: Approval of 1985 Tax Resolutions d. Initiate Process to Amend the Comprehensive Land Use Plan from Campus Business to Residential Low Density, Approximately 64 Acres at the Northwest Intersection of Highway 5 and County Road 17 (Highpath Farm). Motion was seconded by Mayor Hamilton. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Watson and Swenson, Councilman Geving. Councilman Horn opposed. Motion carried. MINUTES: Mayor Hamilton moved to approve the City Council Minutes dated May 13, 1985. Motion was seconded by Councilwoman Watson. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Watson and Swenson, Councilmen Horn and Geving. No negative votes. Motion carried. Councilwoman Watson moved to note the Planning Commission minutes dated April 24, 1985. Motion was seconded by Councilman Geving. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Watson and Swenson, Councilmen Horn and Geving. No negative votes. Motion carried. SIDE YARD VARIANCE REQUEST FOR A DECK, 96 SHASTA CIRCLE EAST, THERESA ESTREM: The above item was passed unanimously at an earlier Board of Adjustments and Appeals meeting, therefore, no action was required. Council Meeting, June 3, 85 -2- MINNEWASHTA GATE, SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHWAYS 41 AND 7-L TOMAC DEVELOPMENT: A. Land Use Plan Amendment Request to Change Low Density Residential Land Use to Commercial. B. Rezoning Request to Rezone Subject Property from R-1, Single Family Residence to C-1, Office Building District and C-2, General Commercial. C. Preliminary Plat Approval for the Subdivision of a 7_9 Acre Parcel into Four Lots of 1.1, 1.91 1^4 and 2.0 Acres for Commercial Development. Barb Dacy: The subject property is located at the southwest corner of Highway 7 and Highway 41. It totals approximately 8 acres and is now zoned R-1, single family residential. The request before you is 1) Land use plan amendment from low density residential to commercial, 2) Rezoning from R-1 to C-2 and C-1 and 3) A preliminary plat approval. There has been some history regarding this site. From what we could research, in 1968, the area was designated as service commercial and in 1972, as a part of the new zoning ordinance at that time, the property was rezoned to R-1 single family. In 1983, there was a land use plan amendment request by Mr. Reutiman. This request was denied in 1983. The subject request has been before the Planning Com- mission and the City Council for a sketch plan review and twice before the Planning Commission for these items on April 24, 1985 and May 22, 1985. The proposal was of concern to the Planning Commission and to the neighborhood surrounding the subject parcel. The Commission felt that the traffic design was a crucial part of the design of the subdivision. I would like to review the traffic options that have been discussed in regards to this proposal. When first presented during sketch plan review, the applicants proposed a "T" intersection from Highway 7 closing Oriole Lane, 'IT"-ing into a new frontage road that would connect the new street through the subivision into the intersection of Oriole Lane. It was brought out during this review that there was concern raised regarding the left turn movement as you go west on Highway 7 and proceeding into the neighborhood. There was also concern raised on this proposal because it would require the removal of the existing house there. Therefore, option two was prepared by the applicants. You no longer have a "T" intersection, but the Oriole access is closed and moved to the east. In the letter from MnDot, they are suggesting and we are recommending that median improvements be made on Highway 7 as well as right turn movements. It was felt that this option achieved two objectives: 1) to separate the commerical and residential traffic, meaning that there should be no reason why either direction on Highway 7 or 41 should travel through the neighborhood. There would be access onto Highway 7 and easy onto 41. 2) To maintain, as much as possible, the existing traffic pattern. We have a proposed connection from the existing Oriole Lane out onto Highway 7 and also keeping the 64th Street access open. Another option that has been proposed is to confine the access to the development from Highway 41. In the letter from MnDot, they stated that a 600 foot distance to another major intersection on 41 would have to be main- tained and also that 64th Street would have to be closed. In this option Oriole Lane would be open and there would be no access onto Highway 7, access contained from 41. The draw back to this particular option is that is does close 64th Street and there- fore, another access point into and out of the neighborhood. Traffic would have to come through the intersection and down into Oriole Lane. Another option that has been proposed is to keep Oriole Lane open, close the frontage road and access onto Highway 7 and create a cul-de-sac from 64th Street. While this, to some degree, con- tains some commercial traffic, there is still the possible traffic pattern of commer- cial traffic leaving the proposed area and passing through the neighborhood and going to Oriole Lane to proceed west bound on Highway 7. A fifth option that has been pro- posed would be to maintain the proposed access onto Highway 7 with the required improvements; the median and the right turn lane, the access onto 64th Street onto Highway 41, but closing off the frontage road and the Oriole Lane access. MnDot says it has to be one or the other, we can't have two accesses onto Highway 7. This would r, isolate the neighborhood and _still provide some sort of traffic from 64th Street into Council Meeting Februa. , 1985 -9- we back up on that at this point we are renigging on a past commitment that we had made and really all we are doing in this case is we are not changing any of the guidelines of what Type A, B and C mean, all we are doing is changing the mix. Councilman Gevin - Type C with the five and ten foot side yard setback was approved for Type C only and we allowed that smaller lot size with the variation of the five and ten so that the builder could have that capability of adjusting his house on the lot. There was never any intention on my part of approving that for Type A and Type B and I think if you look at the minutes of those meetings you will find that we granted that for only Type C. Councilman Horn - I was asking a question. Bill Monk - I believe that Councilman Geving is correct. It is my understanding from the minutes that five and ten were definitely approved for Type C. That is how they are going in. Councilman Horn - The way the report is written it would indicate that those setbacks are all indicated under the background information. Nothing is mentioned about those under the section marked proposed changes in the Staff report. Barbara Dacy - I would apologize for the confusing situation there but during our staff research on the background of it our records show that the five and ten foot alternating setbacks were approved for the Type C. I think what that paragraph was intending was to explain that the developer wanted to use the same setbacks. Mayor Hamilton - My memory seems to be the same as Clarks. Peter. Pflaum - We had a copy just like this that had the setbacks on it that was approved. Mayor Hamilton - We were going to review each phase but the approval was for five and ten foot setbacks. Bill Monk - I think Peter is right. Some of the earlier plans did say Phase A and C and B would have the five and ten foot setbacks on either side but what we look at when we go back to the minutes was actually approved by the Council not necessarily what's on the plan. I know it's been discussed before. We could find no mention in the Council minutes where the Council actually approved five and ten foot side yard setbacks for anything but C. That maybe what people are remembering. Mayor Hamilton - I am afraid I did not understand that to be a issue this evening. We were talking about the swap of A's, B's, and C's. Councilman Horn - Could I ask the developer, would this be a big issue for you in the proper platting of Type B housing? Peter Pflaum - The only reason we wanted it was for flexibility in locating the houses on some particular situation. What I would suggest as maybe a way of getting around this is that let us look, hopefully, you will approve the plat with the ten and ten, let us look at it and see if we can live with that then there is no issue at all. If we can't live with that then I guess we have to come back and talk to you. It is very critical in the Type C lots. Mayor Hamilton - Are the homes selling well now? Peter Pflaum - Yes. Council Meeting February 4, l '5 -10- Mayor Hamilton - Are people complaining that they are too close to each other? Peter Pflaum - The first phase, the models opened in March so in 11 months we have sold 45. I think it has been fairly well received. Councilman Horn - I think they were a little close in that area but I don't know what other option we had. If I compared that to what the alternate was which was quads or something like that, I think this much more acceptable. Councilwoman Swenson - You are loosing six condominium units and you are loosing 13 of the Type A which is even better. Councilman Horn - I was comparing the Type C to what was proposed initially. Councilwoman Swenson moved to accept the final development plan amendment for the Near Mountain PRD, Planning Case 79-2, PUD, with the City Engineer's proposed amend- ment to the plan dated January 15, 1985, with the ten and ten side yard setbacks, 25 foot front yard setback, and Planning Commission recommendations 1-3. Motion seconded by Mayor Hamilton. Councilman Horn - This does not cover the Type A, this is Type B at this time? Barbara Dacy - There may be a certain number of A units as the plans progress that are developed and on the plan the Type A lots are to be constructed at setbacks of 30 in the front and 10 on each side as it is now in the R-lA. The Type B units are 25 in the front and as your motion, ten and ten. Mayor Hamilton - They are asking for an amendment to final development approval which was given some time ago. This is just an amendment and really the amendment is for the swap of the A's and B's and condos. Councilman Horn - We are approving both the areas indicated in A and B? Bill Monk - Yes, you are. Mayor Hamilton - Is there more discussion on the motion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. Councilwoman Swenson - Aye. Councilwoman Watson - Aye. Councilman Horn - Aye. Councilman Geving - Aye. Mayor Hamilton - Aye. Opposed? Motion carried. SIGN VARIANCE REQUEST, TWO TEMPORARY SIGNS, TED KORZENOWSKI: Barbara Dacy - As you approach the 101 and Highway 5 intersection from the east, the City sign is blocking the applicant's sign which is the reason why he is applying for a variance. What he is requesting is two variances, one for an additional free standing sign and a free standing sign to be located off the premises. Each sign is proposed to measure 32 square feet. The additional free standing sign on the appli- cants property is proposed to be located near the existing City sign. The other sign is proposed to be located where the Chanhassen Center Building is on the north side a Of Highway 5. In my report I noted that usually there is one free standing sign per co N cu LJ r iT:2 r V 91 'M ")2 ��� rr�C w pn a Its — M V- ll a 's LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 (612) 937-1900 APPLICANT: Near Mountain Partnership I OWNER: ADDRESS 935 East Wayzata Boulevard ADDRESS Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Zip Code TELEPHONE (Daytime) 473-1231 TELEPHONE REQUEST: Zoning District Change Zoning Appeal Zoning Variance Zoning Text Amendment Land Use Plan Amendment ' Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Review PROJECT NAME PRESENT LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION' REQUESTED LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION PRESENT ZONING REQUESTED ZONING USES PROPOSED SIZE OF PROPERTY 68.16 ac. CITY OF CHANHASSEN !AN 21985 r,OY. MUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEF- Zip Code Planned Unit Development Sketch Plan Preliminary Plan Final Plan Subdivision Platting Metes and Bounds Street/Easement Vacation LOCATION N 1/2 of Section 1, Tow.nshi.p 116, Ranqe 23 REASONS FOR THIS REQUEST Adjustment of lot sizes and dimensions, and of streets configuration. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Attach legal if necessary) Outlots A, B1 C, and D, Near Mountain (over) City of Chanhassen Land Development Application P,ag e 2 FILING INSTRUCTIONS: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the City Planner to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. FILING CERTIFICATION: The undersigned representative of the applicant hereby certifies that he is familiar with the procedural requirements of all applicable City Ordinances. L U-V\ �Q Signed B 9 Y Date p cant _ M The undersigned hereby certifies that the applicant has been authorized to make this application for the property herein described. Signed By Fee Owner Date Application Received /-.2-is— Application Fee Paid ll// $1 ,322.40 /�� City Receipt No. Date ` 68.16 ac.x $15.00 = $1,022.40 * This Application will be considered by the Planning Commission/ ;ustmcnt s at their meeting. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED FINAL PLAN AMENDMENT . CITY OF CHANHASSEN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a Public Hearing on Wednesday, January 23, 1985 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 690 Coulter Drive. The purpose of this hearing is to consider the application of Near Mountain Partnership I to amend the Final Plan of Near Mountain Development on property zoned P-1, Planned Residential Development located at the N1 of Section 1, Township 116, Range 23. A plan showing the location of the proposed final plan amend- ment is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposed final plan amendment. A,'-BarbaraiDacy��,Ait(y ZPlanneE7 Phone: 937-1900 (Publish in the Carver County Herald January 9, 1985.) A City of Chanhassen Community Development Departnic 690 Coulter Drive P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (612) 937-1900 Date: January 3, 1985 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies Fran: Chanhassen Community Development Departrent, By: Jo Ann Olsen, Asst. City Planner Subject: Final Plan Amendment of Near Mountain Develop Residential Development, and located at the N Planning Case No: 79-2 PUD on property zoned P-1, Planned Ccnni--1 r%n l ,Thy_,.-.-1.4... i i r i The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Conanlnity Development Department on January 2, 1985 In order for us to have the benefit of as much information as possible concerning this application, we would like your agency to review the enclosed development plans insofar as is applicable to your agency, and make any ccnments you might have on this proposal. We are particularly interested in matters which affect the public health, safety and general welfare. Specifically, we would appreciate your ccmnents and reccmnendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a_written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recamTendation to the Planning Ccnudssion and City Council encaapassing these needs. F This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning CaRMlission on January 23, 1985 at-7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. In order for the Community Development Department to prepare a thorough review of this application for the C mmission and Council, we would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than January 14, 1985 _ You may also appear at the Planning C nr(Lission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. Enclosed: Proposed Development Plans DISTRIBUTION: ey Riley Purgatory Creek City Engineer Watershed Dist. Engineer 2. City Attorn Soil Conservation Service 8 MN Dept of Transportation Eire Depart U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1 Minnegasco File: C4=nmity Development Department gorm No. 81-10 Agency Referral 7/l/81 �5" ; MN Dept of Natural Resources 12 Cc mpany 15-Tic or United) Company NSP r DIN Valley Co-op) /Va� A4 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 October 3, 1984 Lundgren Brothers Construction, Inc. Attn: Peter and Michael Pflaum 935 East Wayzata Blvd. Wayzata, MN 55391 Dear Peter and Mike: I am in receipt of the City of Shorewood's letter wherein they state no objection to your reviewing all possible means to pro- vide water service to that portion of the Near Mountain Development lying within the City of Shorewood (copy attached). I believe this letter meets the "courtesy" question I posed approximately 30 days ago, i.e: "Would the City of Chanhassen consider providing water ser- vice to your development lying within Shorewood? You noted that finding an economical means to provide water service to this development was critical to its success. Further, the City of Shorewood does not have municipal water service that could be made available to your development nor, following problems incurred by them this past year, is it feasible to consider that such service would be available within the foreseeable future. Finally, you stated your knowledge of the fact that the City of Chanhassen was in the process of starting a feasibility study to analyze our current and future water capabilities/deficiencies. You asked if this study could be modified to include the question of the feasibility providing water service to your develop- ment." As I noted earlier, I believe the attached letter from the City of Shorewood meets the "courtesy" issue discussed during our telephone conversation. I would like to place this item on the City Council agenda for October 15, 1984. I would ask that you attend this meeting to present your request. As I understand such, the request would solely be one of asking the City of Chanhassen to expand the current feasibility study to include determining the feasibility of providing water service to your properties lying within the Peter & Michael Pflaum October 3, 1984 Page 2 City of Shorewood. It is my understanding that the City of Shorewood has been notified that the City of Chanhassen would solely be considering water service for your development. The City of Chanhassen could not consider making this type of an extension across the entire length of our borderline with Shorewood without significantly changing the scope of the study currently being considered. The issue to be presented on October 15th is a policy question to be determined by the Chanhassen City Council. Please notify me if this date is inconvenient. I could schedule this item for November 5, 1984. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. S incere V� Don Ashworth City Manger DA:k cc: Roger Knutson, City Attorney Bill Monk, City Engineer Barbara Dacy, City Planner MAYOR Robert Rascop COUNCIL Jan Haugen Tad Shaw Kristi Stover Robert Gagne CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD 0 SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 • (612) 474-3236 September 27, 1984 Mr. Donald Ashworth City Manager City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, Minn. 55317 Dear Mr. Ashworth: The developers of the Near Mountain residential development, which bounds through an area of both of our cities, appeared before the Shorewood City Council on September 24, 1984, to discuss several matters. One of these matters relates to the City of Chanhassen which is the reason for my correspondence to you. As you may be aware, the City of Shorewood has several developers interested in developing the southeast section of the City. With this development comes the question of water service to the area. With several Council meetings devoted to discussion of a water system for this area, the City Council of the City of Shorewood at its meeting held on September 10, 1984, passed the following Resolution: "The Citizens of Shorewood will obtain water by means of individual .private wells or privately owned community wells until the Citizens demand municipal water or if the private supply is threatened by shortage or contamination and when the City can economically afford to provide municipal water. This policy is not intended to prohibit the purchase of water from existing municipal facilities at the resident's request". With this policy in place as to municipal water, the Near Mountain developers (Peter and Mike Phlaum) questioned if the City of Shorewood would allow the Near Mountain development located in Shorewood to be served by municipal water coming from the City of Chanhassen. This, of course, is dependent upon Chanhassen's support of this proposal. Based upon Shorewood's policy stating no municipal water at this time, the Shorewood City Council unanimously supports efforts by the Phlaum's to obtain municipal water for Near Mountain (Shorewood) from the City of Chanhassen. PIECE v r- OCT - 21984 CITY OF CHANHASSEN A Residential Community on Lake Minnetonka's South Shore Mr. Donald Ashworth September 27, 1984 page two Please direct any response to City Administrator, Dan Vogt, with regards to this issue. Thank you. Sincerely, CITY OF OF SHOREWOOD J Robert Rasco Mayor cc: Dan Vogt Peter Phlaum CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR FINAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND STREET AND EASEMENT VACATION FOR THE NEAR MOUNTAIN P.R.D., L'UNDGREN BROTHERS, INC., CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, will meet on Wednesday the 8th day of February, 1984 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall, 690 Coulter Drive for the purpose of holding a public hearing to consider a final plan amendment and street and easement vacations for the Near Mountain P.R.D. proposed by Lundgren Brothers Construction, Inc. and located a the northeasterly most 147 acres of -the City of Chanhassen. Plans showing said proposed final development plan amendment and street and easement vacations is available at City Hall. All persons interested may appear and be heard at said time and place. BY ORDER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Bob 'aibel, City Planner (Publish in the Carver County Herald January 25, 1984.) • 1Ov 10a -10a -10a -4Oa -iO'Q 07 A Z D E;13 Z D E m z D E m Z D E a Z D£ 7a Z b E m A D x z 0 D X Z O A X Z O A X Z O A X Z O A X Z O -4 3-0 m a 3 v m a 3 a rn a 3 a m a 3 m m a 3-0 m m 0 m A m rn A;13 m A a m D_A m D;a m b m x 0 \ -< D \ -< D \ -< D \ -< D \ -< D \ D D A m Z O D m z 0 A m Z O D T Z O A T Z O D- m Z 0 0 -i Oil D0 0Z7 DO OaD0 0mD0 a D0 O mAO O rn 0 3a7 0 3a O 3A 0 3 A O 2.a 0 3a W m m .a m m T. .Z7 m ;o m A3 m O \ 3O OT70 W ZOl 0 W Z—:x W 3Y LLY W 3YC-(-Y W 3� ZZ N N H -H TF HYA O`F H.O H H.oF T•O O O.OF H10M .OF a.0 RIm (71 \ zol0m7 ZF.anoY ZOzz0 3 coF -4a Z x • Z N< F Z O Z Z O Z N Z Z N Z o 0 O N O m m M D(Yo V W T mMp)w m.Omm.Ow rnF F W ma,3DO1 W W 1 W m Y 1 (A -< Y -1 -I -i Y -1 -1 -I Y o--1 O0a E OC 2 I 0<00 1 ON 1 U) I Za 00 P Y ZmG1 U1Y z z > a Y 7C2 ONY ZAzz �+ Xr-7,X ZOEE Y .. x AD--IY Z03-1 Y XE N C Y n D-< C V D-<Q*r,c V Dr - DAD -4D-irr0 -4DZDO0 A-i -1f) -ice V R. W 1 OZ I rn i" 1 0 0 0 E rC E I VIM ]>A I s%7 m N :[;om£ZN 3-<mmrN 3£DDZN 3H(n ZN VnZ HH N Z01001N ZOm 1N Z «mN ZZOO N Zz1-1 N -1-1--1ZZ w AD AO) vDA-< - rXTr mADr a 0 1 m W O m R W m Z Z W H H W O r H w N M m F m OW 0 O W H Ow Z wz(A m Z W m W UI H VI 0 0 In < T T m VIM m UI 0 rn 00 in 0 o In D 0 Ul m m A o In E 0 VI o -0 a o W H O W 0 W m m . O W m H A O W A O m O +` D VI F 3 F F Tm N FO -m0o F OO ;a 0 W W W 0) W 0) . W M V w F Y 47 2 00 H � � F- m 0 0 On E £ x x Z RI a H Z 0 C 30LWQ.w :r—T.7CYw w 3O`000 W (-Yw 3Y OOYw 1-4YA-1011> H0m OF H.DHH F HYO TF F-4 00.0F H.0 a D.OF a Z O`3mY z0?z R. 00 ZOzz ZN zI Y ZY xxY ZO G <0 01 Z T m< T Z F Z F Z O z z Z `J O O N Z Y Z Z Y Z O H H O m U1m VPW mVmLVw m.0 mM W m -I-IV W rnN Nw m0007003w ma -1Uf- z Y 1 1 Y 1 1-1 Y -I<xx Y 1 R'>D r H Y mm 0 C r- 1 0<xE 1 0 < 0 0 I 0H-<-< I 01 ( 01Uf Ul ( 10 Zz 0 Y 7C Z3 (nY ZD C Y Pqr-nM<Y ZAZ Zy c X- Y ZZ xrn ZZODT. Y O C C Y -<a A -<O:xc V Dr W>-4 7X r Dr-DT> Y V 3 3<Y D2 H V ;. Er-r-1Y DZHOO V E (') C71Y AZ 7CT.0 V m Oa DZ I ME(ir I rn 1 HX;rz 1 0CE 1 00£ I E1 3m0mZN 3-<Cxr-N x-<mm N 3rmrnmN 3rmozN 3I- X z N z-< ZOO-4-<" Z ;UmmN Z << N ZrHH N ZH D N ZH N In ZH 0 W m j 0AA -4-Ix ZX r Z rnr ma A AZAw m0 w A3ZZ W axxH W mrfHHw m -i*Hw (AZ r O W H S O W H W O r W 0 Z w Z W -n V( o In<rn A w<-n-n Ut r UIZC£In wm Dm r0 VI O In mm O In m m m O VI 0 VI00H O UI0 (- 0 Hm W 0 W O W m m 0 w .a 0 W D -n i7 0 w m 0 UN 3 F VI F F F mm N F 00 F moo F 00 -iD w VI w .p W .p W 00 W V1 W N -1 n n H 2 C z i S N U1 1 rn 3 3 Y 0 0 Y W 3 a• A D o w 3 Y 3 3 W 3 CM a o (N 3 Y E E Y W 3 Y D 7C r w 1-(00AOF HYr a•F M.aHH F HYC' 0`41 H.OH %041 H.Qam.OF z.0 a SM.O Z' m Y Z0>A." Z Z Co, ZoZZ ZY(A go �Y r mY z --1 ZY M 0•-<L-O•(A V m n V w Z0zZ m.0 rnm W z.0U) Y m mD•a(A Yr Y m0)HD 0) W Zox-{O Moa OW 1 Y --1 VI E Y 1 -i -1 — -1 < r Y -i D Z Y 1 A x Y 01D7C I OC r I 0 < 0 0 I 0Hr'n 1 0-130 1 01 m I ZOOM Y ZZrrn Y Z D Z Z Y Z Z m Y z o m Y Z 0R-Z1� 7CE0<-IY 7ZmZVf Y Tr7C7C Y 7Cmam<Y T.£mM -IY 7CE z11 DZrEO V D1Z2C V DrDD V A RIHV >Z NO V DZ (j) 10V r a H E I = A Z I m I x m a z I r A 0g ( r x E I 3 H S -i z N 3 m D m Z N 3 -< m rn N 3 H a A m N 3 M Z Z Z N 3 H m 3 Z N ZZ 0 N Zcm-1 Z << N ZrmZ N ZZO N ZZA A N m T.2r l>-I ODD rm x mmm r-- mM ufr m H W O A W m Z Z W 3 H w m 1 H w H O H W a< Z w O W W A D r W m O D Z W a m Z Z w In OE rn VI UI -n -n VI0Z r W0orrn w0 m UI D H 0 VI o U1 m m O N O VI Z O w 0 0 m W 0 1 A O w 0 w M m Cl w 17 O W :LI O w m m o m F 0 O In F w F m m W F 00 F O C. F A 00 a W 2 T W N W O W .O W P W -4 W Oa O n 1 z Z �7 > 2 o x m . a H F V W to F O Y t 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 O O M H n 'n m m 0 3-imm < x M M m fA -I x m H Z x Z 'n O m -I -[ Eza rzH o-I 0 M H x voa 47HZ-I m Z O � A m x zo rn O C M zZ W-i n> n rm-j�1 -I H0:1W m mrna T > H m m O 113 -Iz;o 3 rn m> Lo z(A m a M Fi O-irn �I v W a ' A m m m A i " �scai X N -A1A1 H -1 m 0m z A oz za O=m = m m m m rn w 0 m O (A N 3-V z m v 0 rn b ;a s o A rnz0 o -1 m a 3 W m m o r m 10 L. L. O N m0 r U)a �. 7-V7 rnn0 F O v m x m Cl M H L 1 a r o (A r O H H m m 1 m rIL- -I N A U) A N 3 7C H r z m N O O In O til O W W N F 41 m z Z m v H Z C'f O C m .p .T � Z v O 0 r H j Z Ulm m m m ;a m � M" A Hm SIT OO r Or H M ` m7r4 C" N mj ZmHH N (Az W -n r0 V1 O H A o fA 3 w o -i A F HO Z N -C N m m 3 m C. v 0 0 w M 'i o M C. Az o ,M o N m•- 0 v H F W W vi O H c c v -56- VACATION OF STREETS & EASEMENTS SEE ATTACHED SHEET CASE NO. VAC. City of Chanhassen Carver and Hennepin Counties, Minnesota APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application 1-18-84 Received by Applicant ` j a 4/ --i� a 7oz/ `cam Name: LUNDGREN BROS. CONSTRUCTION, INC. Last First initial Address• 935 E. Wayzata Blvd. Wayzata Minn. 55391 Number'and Street City State Zip Code Name, Address and Signature of Abutting Property Owners 1. Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc. 935 E. Wayzata Blvd. by.Peter Maw 2. 3. 4. 5. 6, 7. 8. 0 14. 15. (Use Additional Sheets) yI hereby declare that all statements made in this re est and on Vie additional materi; are true. U 19- s zgnature Of Applicant 1-18-84 Date Received by title Following to be filled out by Administrator CHRONOLOGY DATE BY A placation on Planning Commission Agenda Planning Commission Postponed to Planning Commisszon.Action licat ion on Council Agenda Council Postponed to Newspaper Publication Adjacent Property Owners Notified Public Hearinq ouncil Action Building Department Notified Applicant Notified 213 acent . Property Owners Notified Filed with County Planning Commission Recommendations On this day of ,19 this petition was (approved), (disapproved_ subject to the following conditions: Chairman of Planning Commission Action by the City On this day of ,19 the Chanhassen City Council (approved), (disapproved) this petition, subject to the folio«ing conditions: Mayor Attest CXty Administrator