79-02 - Near Mountain PUD pt 86-29-82
9-27-82
10-12-82
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
NEAR MOUNTAIN PROPERTIES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
, 1982, by and between NEAR MOUNTAIN
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I, a limited partnership of which PETER
PFLAUM and ROBERT L. MELAMED are General Partners,
(hereinafter the "Developer"), -and the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a
Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City");
WITNESSETH, that the City, in the exercise of its powers
pursuant to MSA §462.358 and other applicable state laws, and
the Developer, in consideration of the mutual covenants
herein contained, recite and agree as follows:
SECTION 1. RECITALS.
1.01. Final DeveloDment Plan and Preliminary Plat
Approval. Developer has heretofore made application to the
City under the City Zoning Ordinance for the approval of a P-1,
Planned Residential Development District, for certain lands
comprising approximately 147 acres, more or less, identified as
Near Mountain, and more particularly described on Exhibit A
attached hereto and made a part hereof. The City Planning
Commission duly held a public hearing on October 17, 1979, on
the petition of the Developer for rezoning of the tracts of
land comprising the Plat from R-lA to P-1, Planned Residential
Development District, under the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance and
for preliminary development plan and preliminary plat approval.
Thereafter, the City Council on May 11, 1981, granted final devel-
opment plan approval, including rezoning of the plat to P-1,
Planned Residential Development District and preliminary plat
approval, all said approvals being subject to the terms and con-
ditions of the within agreement and on the further condition that
the Developer and Owners enter into this agreement.
1.02. Ownership Interests. The fee owner of the
tract of land comprising Lots 1 through 3, Block 1, Lots 1 through
4, Block 2, Lots 1 through 11, Block 3, Lots 1 through 7, Block 4,
Lots 1 through 6, Block 5, and Outlot B in the plat of Near
Mountain is or shall be at the time of platting as follows:
Near Mountain Limited Partnership I, a Limited part-
nership consisting of Peter Pflaum and Robert L. Melamed
as General Partners; and Edmund M. Lundgren, Gerald T.
Lundgren, Allan D. Lundgren, Michael A. Pflaum, Eugene
S. Holderness, David N. Olson, Harry J. Jensen, and
Samuel L. Kaplan, as Trustee under the Trust created by
J.S. Melamed, as Limited Partners.
6-29-82
1.03. Phasing Plan and Recording of Final Plats.
Consistent with the Final Development Plan approval, final plats
for Near Mountain shall be recorded in phases. Each phase
shall be consistent with the approved preliminary plat, more
particularly described on Exhibit B, or require submission of a
new application. The terms of this agreement shall be binding
for all phases platted prior to December 31, 1990. At such time,
the Chanhassen City Council, at its discretion, may further
extend this agreement or require a new application for sub-
sequent phases.
SECTION 2. IMPROVEMENTS BY DEVELOPER.
2.01. Construction. Developer agrees at its expense to
construct, install, and perform all work and furnish all
materials and equipment in connection with the installation of
the following public improvements (hereinafter the "Public
Improvements"), in accordance with the Plans and Specifications
described in 12.02 below, as modified by the Special Conditions
set forth in Section 4 hereof:
a. Street grading, stabilizing, and bituminous surfacing
b. Surmountable concrete curbs and gutters
C. Sanitary sewer mains
d. Watermains
e. Storm and surface water drainage and holding ponds
f. Street signs
g. Boulevard sodding or seeding
h. Underground utility lines, and
i. Street lighting.
2.02. Final Plans and Specifications. The Developer
shall provide the City with final plans and specifications,
including a final grading plan, prepared by a registered pro-
fessional engineer, which plans and specifications shall be sub-
ject to the review and written approval of the City Engineer.
Said plans and specifications are hereby made a part or this
agreement. Developer shall not make or permit any changes,
variations, omissions or additions to City approved final plans
and specifications without the written approval of the City
Engineer prior to any such change, variation, omission or addition.
2.03. Standards of Construction. Developer agrees that
all of the public improvements shall be constructed and
installed in accordance with the aforesaid City approved plans
and specifications, and that said improvements shall equal or
exceed City standards, and that all of said work shall be sub-
ject to the inspection and approval of the City Engineer.
-2-
,.1 6-29-82
2.04. Materials and Labor. All of the materials to be
employed in the making of said public improvements and all of the
work performed in connection therewith shall be of uniformly
good and workmanlike quality. In case any material or labor
supplied, shall be rejected by the City as defective or
unsuitable, then such rejected material shall be removed and
replaced with approved material, and rejected labor shall be
done anew to the satisfaction and approval of the City at the
cost and expense of the Developer.
2.05. Staking, Surveying and Inspection. It is agreed
that the Developer, through his engineer, shall provide for all
staking, surveying and resident inspection for the above
described improvements in order to ensure that the completed
improvements conform to the approved plans and specifications.
The City will provide for general inspection and shall be
notified of all tests to be performed. It is agreed that the
estimated cost of such improvements, including charges of the
City for legal, planning, engineering services, including
inspection, supervision and administration costs, shall be
included in the total cost of all improvements for purposes of
computing the amount of the bond or financial security to be
furnished to the City by the Developer pursuant to the terms of
this agreement.
2.06. Comoletion Date and Schedule of Work.
a. It is agreed by the Developer that the construc-
tion of the public and -private improvements within each final
plat of the phases of development contemplated by §1.03
hereof shall commence within one year of the filing of the
final plat at the Carver County Courthouse and that all
public improvements shall be completed within two years of
said plat filing.
b. It is agreed that the Developer shall submit a
written schedule indicating the progress schedule and order
of completion of the work covered by this agreement. It is
further agreed that upon receipt of written notice from the
Developer of the existence of causes over which the
Developer has no control which will delay the completion of
the work, the City Council, at its discretion, may extend
the date hereinbefore specified for completion and that any
bond or financial security required shall.be continued by
the Developer to cover the work during this extension of
time.
C. Final approval and acceptance of the project
shall take the form of a Resolution duly passed by the City
Council, on the advice of the City Engineer.
2.07. Claims for Work. The Developer shall not do any
work or furnish any materials not covered by the plans and spec-
ifications and special conditions of this agreement, for which
reimbursement is expected from the City, unless such work is
first ordered in writing by the City Engineer as provided in the
specifications.
-3-
6-29-82
9-27-82
Any such work or materials which may be done or
furnished by the contractor, without such written order first
being given shall be at his own risk, cost and expense, and he
hereby agrees that without such written order he will make no
claim for compensation for work or materials so done or
furnished.
2.08. Final Inspection. Upon completion of all the
work required by the City Engineer, a representative of the
contractor, and a representative of the Developer's engineer will
make a final inspection of the work. Before final payment is
made to the contractor by the Developer, the City Engineer shall
be satisfied that all work is satisfactorily completed in accor-
dance with the approved plans and specifications, and the resolu-
tion noted in Section 2.06(c) shall be adopted. Also, the
Developer's engineer shall submit a written statement attesting
to same.
2.09. As Built Plans. Upon completion of the work, the
Developer shall have his engineer provide the City with a full
set of as -built mylar reproducible plans for City records.
These plans shall include the locations and ties to all sanitary
sewer and watermain services as well as gate valve boxes and
manholes.
2.10. CitZ Disclaimer. It is agreed anything to the
contrary herein notwithstanding, that the City of Chanhassen,
the City Council and their agents, or employees, shall not be per-
sonally liable or responsible in any manner to the Developer,
Developer's contractor or subcontractor, material men, laborers
or to any other person or persons whomsoever, for any claim,
demand, damages, actions or causes of action of any kind or
character arising out of or by reason of the execution of this
agreement or the performance and completion of the work and the
improvements provided herein, and that the Developer shall save
the City harmless from all such claims, demands, damages,
actions or causes of actions or the costs disbursements, and
expenses of defending the same, specifically including, without
intending to limit the categories of said costs, cost and expenses
for City administrative time and labor, costs of consulting
engineering services and costs of legal services rendered in
connection with defending such claims as may be brought against
the City.
2.11. Erosion Control. Developer, at its expense,
shall provide temporary dams, earthwork or such other devices
and practices, including seeding of graded areas, as shall be
needed, in the judgment of the City Engineer, and the
Riley -Purgatory Creek Watershed District, to prevent the washing,
flooding, sedimentation and erosion of lands and roads within
and outside the plat during all phases of construction,
including construction on individual lots.
-4-
6-29-82
2.12. Street Liahting. The expense of furnishing
electrical energy for street lighting purposes shall be assumed
by the City twenty-four (24) months after completion of
installation of the street lighting system, or after fifty per-
cent (50%) of the building lots have been improved by the
construction of residences thereon, whichever is first to occur.
2.13. Conveyance of Improvements. Upon completion of
the insallation by Developer of the improvements set forth in
12.01 hereof in accordance with the plans and specifications
hereunder and the written approval by the City, Developer shall
convey said improvements to the City free of all liens and
encumbrances and with warranty of title. Should the Developer
fail to so convey said improvements, the same shall become the
property of the City without further notice or action on the part
of either party hereto, other than acceptance by the City.
2.14. Building Permits and Occupancy Permits.
a. Prior to completion of the grading and placement
of rock stabilizing materials for road construction within
each plat, the City Building Inspector, with the approval
of the City Engineer, shall be authorized to issue building
permits for residential construction within such plat upon
payment of all fees and charges applicable to the issuance
of permits and provisions for adequate site access.
b. The occupancy of any structure within said plats
for residential purposes shall be prohibited by the City
until the rock stabilizing base of the streets shall have
been completed and municipal sanitary sewer and water lines
shall have been installed and are available to serve the
lot for which a building permit shall have been issued.
2.15. One Year Guarantee of Work and Guarantee Bond.
All work and materials performed and furnished by the Developer,
its agents and subcontractors pursuant to 12.01 above, which are
found by the City to be defective within one year after accep-
tance by the City, shall be replaced by Developer at Developer's
sole expense. The within guarantee of ;cork shall be secured to
the City by an irrevocable letter of credit, or a corporate surety
bond, at the election of and in an amount established by the City,
furnished by the developer to the City. Said letter of credit or
surety bond shall first be approved by the City Attorney, and
shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other remedies
which may be available to the City to secure any defects in
materials and workmanship.
2.16. Liability Insurance. Developer shall take out
and maintain so long as Developer's obligations continue under
this agreement, public liability and property damage insurance
covering personal injury, including death, and claims for prop-
erty damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work
of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed
by any of them. Limits for bodily injury or death shall be not
-5-
6-29-82
10-12-82
less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each
accident; limits for property damage shall be not less than
$200,000 for each accident. The City shall be named as an addi-
tional named insured on said policy, and Developer shall file a
copy of the insurance coverage with the City.
2.17. Remedies Upon Default.
a. Assessments. In the event Developer shall
default in the performance of any of the covenants and
agreements herein contained, and such default shall not
have been cured within ten (10) days after receipt by
Developer of written notice thereof, the City, if it so
elects, may cause any of the required improvements to be
constructed and installed, or may take action to cure said
default, and may cause the entire cost thereof, including
all reasonable engineering, legal and administrative
expense incurred by the City, to be recovered as a special
assessment under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, in which
case the Developer agrees to pay the entire amount of the
assessment roll pertaining to any such improvement within
sixty (60) days after its adoption. In addition, Developer
further agrees that in the event of its failure to pay in
full any such special assessment within the time prescribed
herein, the City shall have a specific lien on all of
Developer's real property within said plat for any amount
so unpaid, and the City shall have the right to foreclose
said lien in the manner prescribed for the foreclosure of
mechanic's liens under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
b. Legal Proceedings. In addition to the foregoing,
the City may institute any proper action or proceeding at
law or at equity to compel specific performance, to prevent
violations, or to restrain or abate violations of this
development contract.
SECTION 3. Reserved.
6-29-82
9-27-82
10-12-82
SECTION 4. SPECIAL CONDITIONS.
4.01. Trail System.
a. The Developer shall donate to the City a per-
petual fifteen (15) foot wide easement for a pedestrian
trail system which shall substantially conform to the
Preliminary Development Plan previously submitted to the
Planning Commission on August 29, 1979 and identified as
"Site Plan" prepared by Herb Baldwin, Landscape Architect,
showing the trail alignment and a proposed scenic overlook.
The trail system, shall be separate from the street bitumi-
nous surface, although where adjacent to the roadway it is
within the platted right-of-way, and may be activated by the
City at any time, regardless of whether the phase of the pro-
ject over which the trail system extends has been finally
platted or devel-oped. The obligation to furnish and install
the surfacing and to maintain the. system shall be solely that
of the City.
b. Outlot B shall be dedicated to the City as
part of the pedestrian trail system.
4.02. Covenants and Restrictions. Any proposed cove-
nants or restrictions to be placed upon the lots in the subject
plat shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to recording
with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles. The zoning
ordinances and regulations of the City shall govern if incon-
sistent with said covenants and restrictions to the extent
actually inconsistent; but if not inconsistent therewith, the
standards contained in said covenants and restrictions shall be
considered as requirements in addition to said City ordinances
and regulations.
4.03. Setting of Lot and Block Monuments.
shall place iron monuments at all lot and block
all other angle points on boundary lines. Iron
be placed after construction of improvements has
in order to preserve the lot markers for future
4.04. Street.
Developer
corners and at
monuments shall
been completed
property owners.
a. The North -South (Near Mountain Blvd.) and East-West
(as yet unnamed) collector streets within the development
plan shall have a right-of-way of 60 feet and a road surface
of 36 feet. All other residential streets shall have a
right-of-way of 50 feet and a road surface of 28 feet. All
cul-de-sacs shall have a platted radius of 60 feet and a
paved surface with a 40 foot radius.
b. All streets within the plat shall be constructed
with concrete curbs and gutters.
4.05. Street Maintenance During Construction. The
Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until
streets are accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed
ME
when hazards develop in streets to prevent' the public from tra-
veling on same and directing attention to detours. If and when
streets become impassable, such streets shall be barricaded and
close. In the event residences are occupied prior to
completing streets, the Developer shall maintain a smooth sur-
face and provide proper surface drainage. The Developer shall
be responsible for keeping streets within and without the sub-
division swept clean of dirt and debris that may spill or wash
onto the street from his operation. The Developer may request,
in writing, that the City keep the streets open during the
winter months by plowing snow from said streets prior to final
acceptance of said streets. The City shall not be responsible
for re -shaping said streets because of snow plowing operations
if they are requested and providing snow plowing service does
not constitute final acceptance of said streets.
4.06. Street Siqns. All street name and traffic signs
required within the subdivision at the time of City acceptance
shall be furnished and installed by the City at the sole cost of
the Developer.
4.07. Park Fees. Prior to the issuance of building
permits for residential construction within the plat, Developer,
it succesors or assigns, shall pay to the City the park fee then
in force pursuant to Chanhassen Ordinance 14-A and relevant City
Council Resolutions thereafter.
4.08. Undertaking in Lieu of Bond. The Developer has
submitted a proposed "undertaking in lieu of bond" (also known
as a construction loan agreement) rather than a performance bond
or security deposit to secure performance of its obligations
under the within contract. Said "undertaking" is hereby given
concept approval only subject to the following conditions:
a. All documentation evidencing the "undertaking in
lieu of bond" shall be approved by the City Attorney prior
to the commencement of work on the project.
b. The City Engineer shall do all inspection of the
work.
C. No disbursement of funds shall be made by the
escrow agent under said "undertaking" to contractors on pay
requests until the City Engineer certifies that the work has
been done in accordance with City standards and the plans
and specifications. See Exhibit C attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
4.09. Landscaping and Trees and Location of Structures.
a. Landscaping and location of structures shall take
into consideration the preservation of trees, slope protec-
tion, subsurface drainage, prevention of siltation and
similar potential problems.
6-29-82
b. Trees to be provided. Developer shall provide
each single family detached dwelling with one boulevard
canopy tree with a diameter of not less than 11 inches. In
the case of corner lots, one such tree shall be furnished
for each street frontage.
4.10. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances and Regulations;
Permits. In the development of the plat, Developer shall comply
with all laws, ordinances and regulations of, and secure all
necessary permits from, the following authorities:
1. City of Chanhassen
2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments
and commissions
3. Department of Natural Resources
4. Riley -Purgatory Creek Watershed District
5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
4.11. Public Improvement Special Assessments.
Outstanding public improvements special assessments (including
interest) as originally levied shall be split and assigned to
the benefitting lots within the final plat so as not to impair
the existing repayment schedule.
SECTION 5.
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.
5.01. Easements to be Shown on Plat. Easements for
drainage, storm water holding ponds, open space, pedestrian
walkways, trails, City access to storm water holding ponds for
maintenance purposes, and utility easements shall be shown on
all final plats to the extent allowable under applicable state
law. Non -qualifying easements shall be deeded to the City as
outlots or by legal description.
5.02. Proof of Title. Upon request, Developer shall
furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it
is fee owner of the subject property.
5.03. Duration of Contract: This contract shall remain
in effect until such time as Developer shall have fully per-
formed all of its duties and obligations under this contract.
Upon the written request of Developer and upon the adoption of a
resolution by the Chanhassen City Council finding that the
Developer has fully complied with all of the terms of this
contract and finding that Developer has completed performance of
all Developer's duties mandated by this contract, the Chanhassen
City Manager shall issue to the Developer on behalf of the City
an appropriate certificate of compliance for each completed and
accepted phase of the proposed development.
6-29-82
10-12-82
5.04. Notices. All notices, certificates and other
communications hereunder shall be sufficiently given and shall
be deemed given when mailed by certified mail, return receipt
requested, postage prepaid, with property address as indicated
below. The City and the Developer, by written notice given by
one to the other, may designate any address or addresses to
which notices, certificates or other communications to them shall
be sent when required as contemplated by this agreement. Unless
otherwise provided by the respective parties, all notices, cer-
tificates and communications to each of them shall be addressed
as follows:
To the City: City of Chanhassen
690 Coulter Drive
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Attn: City Manager -
To the Developer: Mr. Peter Pf laum
Near Mountain Limited Partnership
935 East Wayzata Blvd.
Wayzata, MN 55391
5.05. Binding Effect. This agreement shall inure to
the benefit of and shall be binding upon the City and the
Developer and their respective successors and assigns. Nothing
in this agreement, express or implied, shall give to any person,
other than the parties hereto, and their respective successors,
and assigns, hereunder, any benefit or other legal or equitable
right, remedy or claim under this agreement.
5.06. Severability. In the event any provisions of
this agreement shall be held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable
by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not
invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision hereof,
and the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or
impaired thereby.
5.07. Execution of Counterparts. This agreement may be
simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which
shall be an original, and all of which shall constitute but one
and the same instrument.
5.08. Construction_ This agreement shall be construed
in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota.
5.09. Headings. Headings at the beginning of sections
and paragraphs hereof are for convenience of reference, and
shall not be considered a part of the text of this contract,
and shall not influence its construction.
-10-
6- 29 -82
5.10. Sign Plan: Signs for the purpose of advertising
the subject property may be erected in accordance with the
Developer's sign plan only after submission to and approval by
the City Council.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these
presents to be executed on the day and year first above written.
NEAR MOUNTAIN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I
By_
General Partner
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
By_
Mayor
By
City Manager
Attachments:
Exhibit A: Preliminary Development Plan
Exhibit B: Preliminary Plat
Exhibit C: Construction Loan Agreement
-11-
5-29-82
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF CARVER
On this
before me, a notary
sonally appeared
ss
day of
public
ing each by me duly sworn
, 19___,
within and for said County, per -
and
to me personally known, who,
did say that they are respectively
the and
of the limited partnership named in the foregoing instrument,
and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said
limited partnership by authority of its
and said
acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said
limited partnership.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss
COUNTY OF CARVER
Notary Public
On this _ day of , 19 , before
me, a notary public within and for said County, personally
appeared Thomas L. Hamilton and Donald W. Ashworth, to me per-
sonally known, who being each by me duly sworn did say that they
are respectively the Mayor and. City Manager of the municipal
corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal
affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said munici-
pal corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed
in behalf of said municipal corporation by authority of its City
Council and said Thomas L. Hamilton and Donald W. Ashworth
acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said
municipal corporation.
Notary Public
-12-
a
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 0 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
MEMORANDUM
TO: .Russell Larson, City Attorney
FROM: Bob Waibel, City Planner
DATE: February 16, 1982
SUBJ: Comments on Draft Development Contract for Near Mountain
PLANNING CASE: 79-2 PUD'
I have reviewed the subject development contract as prepared
by your office, and with the exception of the following questions,
I find it satisfactory.
Section 2.05 Staking, Surveying and Inspection
Do we need to be more specific as to the level of inspection
needed in order to avoid some of street problems experienced
a year after Chaparral was completed?,
Section�2.06 Completion Data and Schedule of Work
Is it advisable or necessary that we have a specified completion
date before the development contract -is executed?
Section 2.13 Street Lighting
I believe that the traditional 24 month or 50% occupancy criteria
is still acceptable.
Section 4.01(b) Trail' System
I do not have an exhibit that shows an Outlot F. As I recall
the trail system was to be located starting from the south at
Outlot "B" (reference Schoell & Madsen and Preliminary Plat) and
proceed along the west side of the collector street running
north to Shorewood. Another trail is to run west along the
north side of the east/west collector to the first cul-de-sac
from where it is to proceed towards and through Outlot "A"
to Pleasant View Road.
Memorandum - Dra' Dev. Contract
Staff Condition #10 from Planning Report of 11/30/81
This condition adopted by the Council requires "that the final
plat and/or development contract delineate the protection
areas in the vicinity of Near Mountain where development is
prohibited." I am open to suggestion as to whether or not this
is possible or necessary and/or how it can be clearly documented.
cc: Don Ashworth, City Manager
Scott Martin, Community Development Director
Bill Monk, City Engineer
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
1
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 O CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
MEMORANDUM
TO: Russell Larson, City Attorney
FROM: Bob Waibel, City Planner •5
DATE: February 16, 1982
SUBJ: Comments on Draft Development Contract for Near Mountain
PLANNING CASE: 79-2 PUD
I have reviewed the subject development contract as prepared
by your office, and with the exception of the following questions,
I find it satisfactory.
Section 2.05 Staking, Surveying and Inspection
Do we need to be more specific as to the level of inspection
needed in order to avoid some of street problems experienced
a year after Chaparral was completed?
Section 2.06 Completion Data and'Schedule of Work
Is it advisable or necessary that we have a specified completion
date before the development contract is executed?
Section 2.13 Street Lighting
I believe that the traditional 24 month or 500 occupancy criteria
is still acceptable.
Section 4.01(b) Trail System
I do not have an exhibit that shows an Outlot F. As I recall
the trail system was to be located starting from the south at
Outlot "B" (reference Schoell & Madsen and Preliminary Plat) and
proceed along the west side of the collector street running
north to Shorewood. Another trail is to run west along the
north side of the east/west collector to the first cul-de-sac
from where it is to proceed towards and through Outlot "A"
to Pleasant View Road.
Memorandum - Dra`_ Dev. Contract
Staff Condition #10 from Planning Report of 11/30/81
This condition adopted by the Council requires "that the final
plat and/or development contract delineate the protection
areas in the vicinity of Near Mountain where development is
prohibited." I am open to suggestion as to whether or not this
is possible or necessary and/or how it can be clearly documented.
cc: Don Ashworth, City Manager
Scott Martin, Communiity Development Director
Bill Monk, City Engineer
MN0060 S 0 1 INTERPRETAT IONS k E C O R T_la
MLRA(S): 103
REV. ELB. 4-80
TYPIC HAPLUDALFS. FINE -LOAMY. MIXED. MESIC
HAYDEN SERIES
THE HAYDEN_.SERIES CONSISTS OF DEEP WELL DRAINED SOILSFORMED IN GLACIAL TILL UNDER DECIDUOUS FOREST ON GROUND AND
TtRMINAL MORAINES. THE SURFACE LAYER IS VERY DARK GRAY LOAM 2 INCHES THICK. THE SUBSURFACE LAYER IS DARK GRAYISH BROWN
LOAM 7 INCHES THICK. THE SU6501L IS BROWN AND YELLOWISH BROWN LOAM AND CLAY LOAM 34 INCHES THICK. THE SUBSTRATUM 15
LIGHT OLIVE BROWN LOAM. SLOPES RANGE FROM 2 TO 35 PERCENT. AREAS ARE USED FOR CROPLAND. PASTURELAND AND WOODLAND.
I
ESTIMATED
SOIL PROPERTIES
(AI
-_ I
IDEPTHI
I
I
IFRACTIPERCENT OF MATERIAL LESS
ILIOUID
IPLAS-
I(IN.)I USDA TEXTURE
I
UNIFIED
( AASHTO
1>3 INI THAN 3" PASSING SIEVE Nl:.
I LIMIT
ITICITYI
I-_L----
I
1
1 (PCT) 1 4 1 10 1 40 1 200
1 I INOEX
-----
f 0-9 IL, SIL
IML,
CL-ML. CL
IA-4
1 0 1100 98-100 85-98 50-80
1 20-30
1 4-10 i
10-9 IFSL. SL
ISM.
SM-SC, SC
IA-4
1 0 1 IOU 95-100 65-85 35-SD
120-30
INP-8 I
19-431CL. L
ICL
IA-7. A-6
1 0 195-100 90-98 80-95 55-75
1 30-50
115-26 1
143-601L. SL. FSL
ICL.
SC
IA-6. A-4
1 0-5 195-100 90-98 75-90 35-70
1 20-35
1 6-15.1
I I
I
I
! I
I
I 1
IDEPTHICLAY IMOIST BULKI
PERMEA-
I AVAILABLE
I SOIL I SALINITY
I SHRINK- IEROSIONIWIND IORGANICI
C13RROSIVITY ]
I(IN.)I(PCT I DENSITY. I
BILITY
IWATER CAPACITYIREACTIONI(MMHOS/CM)I
SWELL IEACL9R5IEROD.IMATTER I-
I
I I<2MM)I (G/CM3)__ I
(IN/HR)
I (IN/IN)
I (PH) I
IPOTEN jIALI K I T IGROUPI (PCT) I STEEL ICONCREj_EI
1 0-9 110-2511.40-1.60 1
0.6-2.0
1 0.20-0.22
15.6-7.3 1 -
I LOW 1.321 5 1 6 1 .5-1 1
LOW IMODEE
ATEI
1 0-9 1 5-1511.45-1.70 12.0-6.0
1 0.14-0.18
15.6-7.3 1 -
I LOW 1.321 5 1 3 1 .5-1 1
19-43118-3511.50-1.65 10.6-2.0
1 0.15-0.19
15.1-7.3 1 -
IOODERATE 1.321
143-60115-2711.55-1.80 ]
1 1 I 1
0.6-2.0
1 0.14-0.19
I
17.4-8.4 1 -
I I
1 LOW 1.321
I I I
-y FLOODING I HIGH WATER TABLE I GENE NTED PAN I BEDROCK (SUBSIDENCE IHYDIPOTENT-LI
DEPTH I KIND IMONTHS I DEPTH I HARDNESS I DEPTH IHARDMESSI INIT. I TOTAL I GRPI FROST I
FREQUENCY I DURATION IMONTHS I (FT) I I l(IN) i I (IN) I 1(IN) ((IN) 1 1 ACTION I
..nun i 1 I I I i- 1 1->60 1 1- I 1 B IMOQERATEI
SANITARY FACILITIES __
_ _
CUNSTRUCTION MATERIAL --�,
1
12-8X: MODERATE-PERCS SLOWLY
fI
1 2-15%: GOOD
(SEPTIC TANK
1 8-15%: MODERATE-PERCS SLOWLY.SLOPE
II
115-25X: FAIR -SLOPE
ABSORPTION
1 15+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
II ROADFILL
125+%: POOR -SLOPE
FIELDS
I
II
]
I
I. 2-7%: MODERATE-SEEPAGE.SLOPE
II
I IMPROBABLE -EXCESS FINES
1 SEWAGE
17+X: SEVERE -SLOPE
II
I
f LAGOON
I
If SAND
I
f AREAS
1
11
I
i 2-8%: MODERATE -TOO CLAYEY
II
I IMPROBABLE -EXCESS FINES
{ SANITARY
18-15X: MODERATE-SLOPE.TOO CLAYEY
fI
I
f LANDFILL
115+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
II GRAVEL
1
1 (TRENCH)
11
1
1
1 2-8X: SLIGHT
11
1 2-8X: FAIR -SMALL STONES
1 SANITARY
j 8-1SX: MODERATE -SLOPE
II
18-15%: FAIR -SMALL STCNES.SLOPE
] LANDFILL
115+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
II TOPSOIL
115+%: POOR -SLOPE
1 (AREA)
I
II
I
12-8%:
FAIR -TOO CLAYEY
11
{ DAILY 18-15%:
FAIR -TOO CLAYEY.SLUPE
II
WATER MANAGEMENT--__-_-
f COVER FOR
15+X:
POOR -SLOPE
II 12-3%:
MODERATE -SEEPAGE I
{ LANDFILL I
II POND 13-8%:
MODERATE-SEEPAGE.SLOPE I
RESERVOIR f
B+%: SEVERE -SLOPE I
it AREA I
I
BUILDING
SITE �Fp V�LOPME
I I 1
-
12-8X:
SLIGHT
II ]
SLIGHT 1
SHALLOW 18-15X:
MODERATE -SLOPE
{{EMBANKMENTS I
EXCAVATIUNS 115+%:
SEVERE -SLOPE
II DIKES AND I
I
LEVEES i
+
] 2-8X:
MODERATE -SHRINK -SWELL
II I
SEVERE -NO WATER
DWELLINGS
18-159:
MODERATE-SHRINK-SWELL.SLOPE
]{ EXCAVATED {
I
WITHOUT
1 15+%:
SEVERE -SLOPE
II PONDS I
I
BASEMENTS
I
..
IIAOUIFER FED I
I
I
11-- I
----- --1
12-8X:
MODERATE -SHRINK -SWELL
II I
DEEP TO WATER I
DWELLINGS
1 8-15%:
MODERATE-SLOPE.SHRINK-SWELL
11 I
WITH
I IS+X:
a VERE-SLOPE
II DRAINAGE ]
I
BASEMENTS
1
I
11 I
11 1
1
-1
{ 2-4%:
MODERATE -SHRINK -SWELL
{{ i
2-3% L.SIL: FAVORABLE I
.SMALL
14-SX:
MODERATE-SHRINK-SWELL.SLOPE
If ]
3+X L.SIL: SLOPE I
COMMERCIAL
I S+X: SEVERE -SLOPE
If IRRIGATION 1
2-3% FSL.SL: SOIL BLOWING 1
II 1
3+% FSL.SL: SOIL BLOWING.SLOPE f
BUILDINGS
1
I
Il I
I
1 2-15%:
SEVERE -LOW STRENGTH
II 12-8X
L.SIL: FAVORABLE 1
LOCAL
115+%:
SEVERE -LOW STRENGTH.SLOPE
II TERRACES 18+X
L.SIL: SLOPE I
ROADS AND
1 '~
11 AND I
2-8% FSL.SL: SOIL BLOWING 1
STREETS
I
I
II DIVERSIONS 18+%
fl I
FSL.SL: SLOPE.SOIL BLOWING I
i
LAWNS.
12-8X:
SLIGHT
11 1
2-8X: FAVORABLE 1
LANDSCAPING
18-15%:
MODERATE -SLOPE
II GRASSED 1
B+X: SLOPE I
AND GOLF
115+X:
SEVERE -SLOPE
II WATERWAYS {
I
FAIRWAYS
1
_. )_1 1
I
REGIONAL INTERPRETATIONS
IPASTURE AND I 0-18X: GROUP 1 1
IHAYLAND 1 18-25X: GROUP 2 1
125+X: GROUP B
1 I
MAY 13 1980
HAYDEN MUNOZ
REE AI-I.4AL DFVELOPMENT
J j 2-8X:
SLIGHT
11 [
2-6%: MODERATE -SLOPE
I 1 B-ISX:
MUDERATE-SLOPE
II 16+X:
SEVERE -SLOPE
CAMP AREAS 115+%:
SEVERE -SLOPE
11PLAYGROUNDS
I I
2-8X:
SLIGHT
II 12-15X:
SLIGHT
! 8-15X:
MODERATE -SLOPE
I1 PATHS 1
15-25%: MODERATE -SLOPE
IPICNIC AREASI 15+%:
SEVERE -SLOPE
AND 1
25+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
II TRAILS
I 1
11 1
MN0060
CAPABILITY ALiD YI L� 5 PER ACRE OF CROPS AND PASTURE (HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT)
I CLASS- I CAPA- I CORN I SOYBEANS { OATS I GRASS- 1BRCMEGRASS-1 KENTUCKY 1
I DETERMINING J BILITY I I 1 ILEGUME HAY I ALFALFA I BLUEGRASS I I
I PHASE j I (BU) 1 lBU) i (BU) I (TONS) I (AUM) I (AUM) i I
I — — INIRRIIRR INIRR 11RR INIRR IIRR INIRRl11RR INIRR IIRR INIRR 11RR= INIRR IIRR, INIRR IIRR,
12-6% 1 2E [ 1100 1 1 30 J { 75 { J 4.5 1 16.5 1 1 3.5
16-12X 1 3E I ! 85 I 1 26 J i 70 I 14.5 I 16.5 1 13.5 1 1 ! I
112-L8X 1 4E I 165 I 1 22 ! j 60 I 1 4.0 I ! r3.0 1 13.0 1 J 1 1
118-25% - 16e I i- I I- I !- 1 13.0 I 14.5 I i 3.0 I I I I
125-35X 1 7E I I- I I- I I- i I- I I-! 11.5 I I I I
I I I I I I 1 1 { I I 1 ! I I 1 I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I
J 1 ! I 1 I I I I I t 1 I I I 1 I I
W DODLA)112 SUlTAB1LITY _,
I CLASS- j ORD I MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS 1 POTENTIAL PRODUCTIVITY I I
DETERMINING J SYM I EROSIONI EQUIP. JSEEDLINGI WINDTH.1 PLANT ! COMMON TREES ISITEI TREES TO PLANT
PHASE I I HAZARD 1 LIMIT I MORT'Y 1 HAZARD I COMPET 1 IINOXI —�-1
12-12% _j20 1 SLIGHT I SLIGHT I SLIGHT I SLIGHT I SLIGHT INORTHERN RED OAK 169 [BLACK WALNUT 1
112+% 12R IMODERATEIMODERATE] SLIGHT I SLIGHT I SLIGHT JAMERICAN BASSWOOD 169 INORTHERN RED OAK I
ISUGAR MAPLE I JAMERICAN BASSWOOD 1
J I I I I JBLACK WALNUT 162 ISILVER MAPLE j
j j 1 1 I I I ]EASTERN WHITE PINE 164 JWHITE OAK j
!WHITE OAK 162 1 1
I I I I I I I I I I I
I ! 1 1 I I I I [ I 1
I i I I I I I I J I t
I I I 1 I I 1 ! 1 I I
I I I I I I I I I ! [
_ WINDBREAKS 1 1
IC ASS-DETERMIN•G PHASEI SPECIES IHTI SPECIES 1HT1 SPECIES IHTI SPECIES _.— IHTI
12-12X JEASTERN WHITE PINE 1281GREEN ASH J351COMM0N HACKBERRY 134JEASTERN COTTONWOOD 1601
1 IPONOEROSA PINE 1261SIBERIAN CRABAPPLE jt8JAMUR MAPLE 1231GRAY DOGWOOD 1121
1 JTATARIAN HONEYSUCKLE111ILILAC 112JNORTHERN WHITE-CEDAR1201WHITE SPRUCE 1221
1 I J I I l I I I I
WILDLIFE HABITAT S IT1R71 ITY -- - —_
[ CLASS- I- POTENTIAL FUR HABITAT ELEMENTS I POTENTIAL AS HABITAT FOR: —1
j DETERMINING IGRAIN &[GRASS &I WILD IHARDWO ICONlFERIS14RUSS IWETLANDISHALLOWIOPENLO IWOODLD IWETLANDIRANGELDI
1 PHASL i_SEED ILEGUME 1 HERB, I -TREKS IPI_ANTS I (PLANTS 1 WATER IWILDLF IWILDLE JmILOLF_IWILOLF 1
12-6% J GOOD 1 GOOD i GOOD I GOOD { GOOD I - IV. POORIV. POORI GOOD I GOOD IV. POORI - 1
16-18% J FAIR I GOOD I GOOD j GOOD j GOOD J - IV. POORIV. POORI GOOD I GOOD 1V. POORI jIB+X 1 POUR J FAIR 1 GOOD 1 GOOD I GOOD j - 1V. POORIV. POORI FAIR I GOOD IV. POORI -
1
I I 1 I I I ! I I I I I
POTENTIAL NATIVE PLANT COMMUNITY (RANGELAND 011 FOREST UNOERjTORY VEGETATION)
1 ! PLANT J — PER rFNT acF cgwPOSI TION (DRY WEIGHT) BY CLASS DETERi:II NING PHASE I
I COMMON PLANT NAME 1 SYMBOL
-
I
I 1 ! I 1 I 1 I
I I I 1 I I i I
I
I 1 I I I I 1 I
J I 1 I j I J I
i I f l I I I I
I I I I I I 1 1
1 I 1
j 1 1 I I 1 t
I I 1 I I 1 1
J POTENTIAL PRODUCTION (LBS./AC. DRY WT): i -- ---- -- --
[ FAVORABLE YEARS
j NORMAL YEARS 1 I I I 1
I� UNFAVORABLE YEARS I I - ---------- I —
FOOTNOTES
BASED ON TEST DATA OF 7 PEDONS.
0-12%: WINDBREAK GROUP 1: 124-X: WINDBREAK GROUP 3.
P R E T A T I O N S F, E
C C R D
r—
MN0625
. S D I L I N T E R
.
�
E_ST_InERVIL_LE SERIES
M LRA(S): 303
REV. JJM.ELB, 11-79
TYPIC HAPLUDOLLS, COARSE. —LOAMY
OVER SANDY uR SANDY —SKELETAL, MIXED. M£SIC
THE ESTHERVILLE SERIES COS ISTS QF -S,C_MEWHA�,�_�,Y�E,�1._ELY DRAINED SOILS FCRMc D��INDY LOAM SECIMENT.S UNDERLAIN AT DEPTHS
OF 15 TC 30 INCHES BY SC OS AND GRAVELS ON DUTWASH PLAINS �D Si k TERRACES. THE SUR-w, .F aSD I<" IS 'BLACK ANC AND VERY
DARK GRAY SANDY LOAM 13 INCHES THICK, THE SUBSOIL IS DARK BROWN SANDY LCAM AND LOAMY SAND 10 INCHES THICK. THE
VELLY COARSE SAND. SLOPES RANGE FROM
SUBSTRATUM IS GRAYISH BROWN. YELLOWISH BROWN AND LIGHT YELLCWISH BRCWN GRA-0 70 2=
PERCENT, MOST AREAS ARE USED
FOR_�ESaPLANQ_-------
-- —I
—
IFRACTIPERCENT CF MATERIAL LESS I1-IQLID IPLAS-
DEPTH 1
I
AASHTG 1>3 INI—THAN 3^—QpSSING SjQVE NO, I LIMIT ITICITYI
1(IN.II USDA TEXTURE
I
UNIFIED
I
I (POT 1I —4 I 10-1-40 _1 200 1 1INDEX
1 0-1315L
ISM, SM—SC. SC
IA-2, A-4 ( 0-5 ISO-300 eC-55 _0-7_ 25-50 120-30 12-1C
5
I O-5 190-100 80-95 50-7. 50-60 I 25-40 14-15
I 0-131
ICL—MLs CL
Sc
IA-4• A-6
IA—A-4. A—) I 15-45
2NP
113-181SL. L. COSL
ISM.
SM—SC.
SP—SM. SM. GF
IA-1 1 0-10145-900 40-85 10-40 2-25 120-30
118-601COS. GR—COS. LCOS
iSP.
I
I DEPTHICLAY IMCIST BULK(
--
PERMEAEA—
I AVAILABLE I SOIL 1 SALINITY I (SHRINK— IERCSICNIWIND ICPGANICI CCRRCSIVITY j
(WATER CAPACITYIREACTIONI(MMHOS/CM)ISWELL
1(IN.)I(PCT I DENSITY I
BILITY
I (IN/IN)
POTENTIALIFKCIOTSJEROD.ILROUPIM(PCT) I STEEL ACCNCRETEI
I (PH) 1 O_-
1<2MM)I (G/CM3) I
1 0-13I 5—i5I1.25-1.35 12.0-5.0
(IN/HR)
I 0.13-0.18
—
I5.6-7,3 i j LOW I.20I 3 1 3 1 2-4 I���1-I —LOW _I
GW S 2-4
LI.201 I I I
1 0-13110-18I1.35-1.45 12.0-6.0
1 0.19-0.22
15.6-7.3 I — I
15.6-7.3 ( — I LCW
113-18110-1811.35-1.60 12.0-6.0
I 0.09-0.14
16.6-8.4 I — I LOW 1.101
118-601 0-8 11.50-1.65 16.0-20
I 0.02-0.04
_--
I
TABLE I CEI��FD FAN_l—QFS�ECS.iiIESIDE)yt�— 1"_JHYDIPDTE NT'LI
I FLOODING
I HIGH—WATER
1 DEPTH
I KIND IMONTHS IDEPTH IHARDNESS IDEPTH IHARDNESSIINIT.ITOTALIGRPI FRCST I
I-
— _
I (FT)
I{IN) L— I (In) 1 ItIN) Ic12�__AACTICr_I
FREQUENCY ATION
--�--
(MONTHS
_1_--_—L--
I �L—J�eq --I
—
I NONE 1
�__
� >`�+4
I
I
ISEPTIC TANK
1 ABSORPTION
1 FIELDS
I
1 SEWAGE
1 LAGOON
AREAS
I
I
SANITARY
I LANDFILL
I (TRENCH)
1 SANITARY
I LANDFILL
I (AREA)
I_ -
I
1 DAILY
I COVER FOR
LANDFILL
{
0-15%: SEVERE —POOR FILTER
15+%: SEVERE —POOR FILTER.SLCPE
0-7%: SEVERE —SEEPAGE
7+%: SEVERE—SEEPAGE.SLOPE
0-15%: SEVERE—SEEPAGE.TCO SANDY
15+%: SEVERE—SEEPAGE,SLOPE,TOD SANDY
0-15X: SEVERE —SEEPAGE
15+%: SEVERE—SEEPAGE.SLOPE
1 POOR—SEEPACE.TOO SANDY,SMALL STONES
1
I
I
O—IC%: SEVERE—CUTBANKS CAVE
SHALLOW 115+%: SEVERE—CUTBANKS CAVE,SLOPE
EXCAVATIONS I
I
1 0-8%: SLIGHT
DWELLINGS 18-15X: MODERATE_ci0 F
WITHOUT 115+%: SEVERE —SLOPE
BASEMENTS I
10-8%: SLIGHT
DWELLINGS 18-15%: MCDERATE—SLOPE.
WITH 115+%: SEVERE —SLOPE
BASEMENTS I
I 0-4X: SLIGHT
SMALL 14-8%: MCDERATE—S L 0
CCNMERCIAL 18+%: SEVERE —SLOPE
BUILDINGS I
--- I 0-8X: SLIGHT
LOCAL 18-15%=_MCDERATE—SLOPE
ROADS AND 115+%: IEVERE—SLOPE
STREETS I
I _
LAWNS. 10-8%: MODERATE —DROUGHTY
LANDSCAPING GhY..,yS1i PE
AND GOLF 115+%: SEVERE —SLOPE
FAIRWAYS I
II
II ROADFILL
it
0-15%: GCOD
15-25%: FAIR —SLOPE
fI I PROBABLE
II I
fI SAND I
11 1
II I PROBABLE
II I
II GRAVEL I
II i
II I 0-15%: POOR —SMALL STCNES.AREA RECLAIM
II 115+%: POUR —SMALL STCNES.AREA RECLAIM,SLCFE
jl TOPSOIL 1
II I
II
W@TER_MPNASEVE43---___---__
it I 0-8%: SEVERE—SEEPACE 1
II POND 18+%: SEVERE—SEEPAGE.SLOPE
lI RESERVCIR 1 1
II AREA I
11 i 5EVERE—SEEPAGE
IIEMBANKMENTS
II DIKES AND I I
II LEVEES 1 1
11— I ------------I
lI I SEVERE —NC WATER
II EXCAVATED I
II PONDS I 1
IIAOUIFER FED
II j DEEF TC WATER 1
II I I
It DRAINAGE I
II I I
II I 0-3X L: CRCUGHTY 1
II 13+% L: DROUGHTY.SLCPE I
lI IRRIGATION I 0-3% SL: DROUGHTY.SCIL BLCWING I
II i 3+% SL: ORCUGHTY.SCIL BLCWi:,G.SLCFE --�
II I o-EX L: TCC SANDY 1
II TERRACES 18+% L: SLOPE.TCO SANDY
II AND I 0-8% SL: TOO SANDY.SCIL BLCWING 1
II DIVERSIONS 18+% SL: SLOPE.TOO SANDY.SCIL BLCWING I
I1 I 0-8%: DROUGHTY
II GRASSED j 8*%: SLCPE,DROUGHTY
II WATERWAYS ( 1
REGICNAL INTERPRETATIONS
I PASTURE 10-12%: GROUP 3 ( I.IQ1j 6 19T9
(ANC 112-25%:GPOUP 10
1HAYLAND I 1
Mh002E.
rh.ERVILLE SERIES
--------------------
-------`-'-- II I 0-2%. MGCERATE-SMALL STCNES
1 0-8X: SLIGHT 1i J 2-6%: MODERATE-SLOPE.SNALL STCNES
1 8-15X: MODERATE -SLOPE
CAMP AREAS J 15+%: SEVERE-SLOPc IIFLAYGROUND� 1 6+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
11
I 0-8%: SLIGHT
J 8-15%: MODERATE -SLOPE
ICNIC AREASI 15+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
I
J 0-IE%: SLIGHT
PATHS J 15-25X: MODERATE-SLCPE
AND I
TRAILS 1
_
CAPABILjjY_Ajg_Yl1<41_EE_ACEESF CROPS AND PASTURE
( SGYBEANS I OATS
(h IGH LEVEL
1 GRASS-
kAhA G F M F N 7 1 — ---
GASS—I I
I KENTUCKY IERCMEF
CLASS-
I CAPA- I CCRN
I I
ILEGUME HAY
I BLUEGRASS I ALFALFA 1 I
DETERMINING
I BILITY I
I [BU)
I (TONS)
I SAUM) L__jAUMM.1___1-- _I
PHASE
I. —_l-1 BU) I (BU)
INIRR I IRR
INIRR IIRR._
NI IR ,,INIRR I IRRi1NJj$�1IRR, I
INIRRIIRR INIRR IIRR INIRR IIRR.
1 40 I
12.0 I
i 2.0 I I
—zX
13S I 150 I
13S I 145 I
117 I
1 15 I 135 I
12.0 I
12.0 I I :,0 I I I I
I I
-6%
14S I 130 I
110 1 1 30 I
11.5 I
11.5 1 12.5 1 I
! 4S I 127 J
15 1 1 29 I
1 1.4 I
11.2 I 12.4
-12X ERODED
I
c.s
11.5 I II I I I
2-18%
16s11.5
I I— I
11.4 1
J 1.2 1 12.4 I I
2-18% ERODED
165 I 11
I—
1.0
I I I I
I I I I
I I i i
I I I I
I I
I I
I I I I I I 1
I I 1 I I I I
I
1 I I I
I I I 1
I I I I I I
I 1 i L—L—I
I I I ! I I
I I 1 I I 1 I
WrILLLAND 5u.UABILjIY____
I
CLASS-
I CRD I— -------- MANA
G>iMENT PRO£LEMS _ —__1 POTENT Ip�PEL.9C11V Y-J_—__—__---
ISEEDLINGI WINDTH.1 PLANT I CCMMON TREES ISITEI TREES TO PLANT
DETERMINING
I SYM I EROSIONI EQUIP.
HAZAED I
PHASE-_I
HABARD I LIMIT
1 MORT-Y.i
I I
I I I
I I J
I I 1
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
1 I I
I I I
I I 1
i I I
I I I
I NONE
I
I
I
i
I
i 1 I
1 1 I
1 I I
I I I
I I 1
I i I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I 1 I
I I I
I I I
I 1 1
1 I I
I I I
I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 1 I
1 I
1 I 1
I I I
I 1 I
I 1 I
—
-----------1_---1----1----�—
W_3L12l3Ef A K S e )
-------
—_ _----------
rFA 1HTL— SPECIES
CLASS-_DETFR MIN•G
PHAS_-_--S�j-----ltu-----3
--1HTl-----oFr
1201JACK PINt
1211PCNOEFCSA FINE 1201
0-12Z
(EASTERN REDCEDAR
1151RED PINE
1201COMMON HACKBERRY
I181BUR OAK
I18IRUS"SIAN-OLIVE 115I
JAUSTRIAN PINE
ISIBERIAN CRABAPPLE
1121SILVER BUFFALCBERRY
I I
1121TATARIAN HCNEYSUCKLEi101SIBERIAN
PEASHRUS i1C
I
I I
I I
I I I I
CLASS -
DETERMINING
0-12%
12-25X
-
__QQjffNTjAL FQR HABITAT ELEMENTS _—��SENTIAL AS HABITAT FCR�
GRAIN &IGRASS 6I WILD IHARDWC ICCNIFERISHRUBS IWETLANDISHALLCWICPENLD IWCODLC IWETLANCIRANGELCI
C EFD [LEGUME I HERB. I TREES IPLAITTSS ]PLANTS I WA ER IWILDL�F IW ILDLF IWILPLE 1'yj"LE-1
FAIR J FAIR J FAIR 1 FAIR I FAIR I - IV. POORIV. POCRI FAIR I FAIR IV. FCCRI - I
POOR I FAIR 1 FAIR J FAIR I FAIR J - IV. PGGRIV. PCCRI POOR I FAIR IV. PCCRI - I
1 I 1 I i I I I I I I I
I I I I I i I I I I I I
__--
I-- - - p----------
__ POTELVjIAL NATiVE_ELANT COMMU TY (R/NNGF-LAND OR -FOREST QNDEESIS.FY Vg�_UATIC�N�L—
I -- 1 PLANT I — PERCENIAGE COMPOSITICN_j2RY WEICHII-EY CLA,�y-DETERMINj_LVG PHA—
�F__—_i
CCMMCN PLANT NAME 1 SYMBOL
I I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I 1
I I I I I I I I
I J
I I I I I I I I
I I
POTENTIAL PRODUCTION (LBS./AC• DRY WT):-'--------�'--
FAVORABLE YEARS I 1 1 1
I NGRMAL YEARS I I I 1 1 1
i--_---_UNF AVQRABLE_YEAE�—I-_-_—
FOGTNOTES
A ESTIMATES OF ENGINEERING PROPERTIES BASED Ch 7EST DATA OF 3 PEDONS FROM STEELE COUNTY, MINNESCI'A.
1 EXCESSIVE PERMEABILITY MAY CAUSE POLLUTION OF NEARBY STREAMS. LAKES AND WELLS.
B 0-12X: WINDBREAK GROUP 6: 12-25X: WINDBREAK GROUP 7, MINNESOTA.
MN0059 SOIL INTERPRETATIONS RECORD Cd
MLRA(S)1 103. lO4 CANISTEO SERIES
REV. KRV. ELB. 3-79
TYPIC HAPLAOUOLLS. FINE -LOAMY. MIXED [CALCAREOUS). MESIC
THE CANISTEO SERIES CONSISTS OF UEEP POORLY -DRAINED SOILS FORMED IN GLACIAL TILL UNDER PRAIRIE
VEGETATION ON RIN OF DEPRESSIONS ON GLACIAL TILL1h17AINS. TYPICALLY. THEY HAYE BLACK AND VERY DARK GRAY CLAY LOAM
SURFACE LAYERS. 20 IN. THICK. DARK GRAY. DARK GRAYISH -BROWN AND OLIVE GRAY CLAY LOAM SUBSOILS. 11 IN. THICK: AND
OLIVE GRAY CLAY LOAM UNDERLYING MATERIAL. SLOPES RANGE FROM 0 TO 2 PERCENT. MOST AREAS ARE CROPPED.
I-- LUI I6TED SOIL PROPERTIES
I DEPTH[ - J I IFRACTIPERCENT OF MATERIAL LESS ILIOUIO IPLAS- J
1(IN.11 USDA TEXTURE I UNIFIED 1 AASHTO 1>3 INI THAN LIMIT ITIC(TY1
I 1 _ — -1---- ----------------L---------- J tPCT11 4 1 to 1 40 1 200 _1--1INDEX _I
i 0-131CL. L JUL. CL IA-7 1 O 198-100 95-100 85-96 60-90 1 40-50 115-20 1
I 0-13)SICL. SIL ICL IA-7. A-6 1 0 1 l00 100 90-100 85-1 OOj 35-50 115-25 1
113-241CL. L. SICL ICL JA-6. A-7 1 0 198-100 90-100 85-95 65-85 1 38-50 125-35 1
124-311CL. L. SL ICL. ML. SM. SC IA-6. A- 4 1 0-5 190-100 60-95 60-90 40-80 1 30-40 1 5-15 I
131-601CL. L ICL IA-6 1 0-5 195-l00 90-98 80-95 60-75 1 30-40 112-20 1
I 1 _ _ 1 1 I I I —L_ I
JDEPTHICLAY IMOIST BULK) PERMEA- I AVAILABLE I SOIL I SALINITY I SHRINK- JEROSIONJWIND JORGANICI CORROSIVITY I
1(IN.II(PCT I DENSITY I BILITY (WATER CAPACITYIREACTIONI(MMHOS/CM)I SWELL IEIlCTORSIEROO.jMATTER I_ I
I-_-1<2MM"_(G/CM3I 1 (IN/NR) 1 (IN[IN) I (PN1 1, JPOTENTIALI K I T IGROUPl (PCT) 1 STEEL _ICONCPETEI
10-13122-3211.25-1.35 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.18-0.22 17.4-8.4 1 - IMOOERATE 1.241 5 1 4L 1 4-8 1 HIGH_,i__�QJ(_—j
10-13118-3511.20-1.30 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.20-0.22 17.4-3.4 1 - IMODERATE 1.321 5 1 4L I 4-d 1
113-24120-3511.35-1.50 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.15-0.19 17.4-8.4 I - IMODERATE 1.321_�-- —�---I
124-31110-3511.30-1.50 1 0.6-6.0 1 0.12-0.18 17.4-8.4 1 - I LOW 1.32J
131-60122-3211.45-1.60 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.14-0.16 17.4-8.4 1 - I LOW 1.321
I FLOODING I _ IHYDIPOTENT•LI
I �_,_ __—I DEPTH KIND MONTHS IDEPTHIHARDNESSIOEPTH JHARDNESSJINIT.ITOTALIGRPI FROST I
I FREQUENCY 1 DURATION IMONTHS I (FT) 1 1 _I(IN) 1 1 (1N) 1 IIIN1 J[IN) 1 1 ALUjQ&_I
J NONE I PA -JULI - i I >60 1 _ 1 IC/Of—HIGH _1
_- SANITARY FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL
J 1 SEVERE -WETNESS I1 1 POOR -LOW STRENGTH J
)SEPTIC TANK I 11 1 1
I ABSORPTION 1 11 ROADFILL I I
I FIELDS I II I 1
1 1 SEVERE-SEEPAGE.WETNESS II I IMPROBABLE -EXCESS FINES j
1 SEWAGE I II I I
J LAGOON I JJ SANC J J
J AREAS f If I 1
J
1 I SEVERE -WETNESS JI 11MPROBAeLE-EXCESS FINES 1
I SANITARY I If J 1
I LANDFILL 1 11 GRAVEL 1 1
I (TRENCH) I II I I
I I SEVERE-SEEPAGE.WETNESS If I FAIR -SMALL STONES I
I SANITARY ( II I I
I LANDFILL J II TOPSOIL I I
J (AREA)
J I POOR -WETNESS II
1 DAILY I JI WATER MANAGEMENT _--
J COVER FOR I If I SEVERE -SEEPAGE 1
i LANDFILL J If POND I I
RESERVOIR I 1
11 AREA I I
1 S - _ - 11 1 SEVERE -WETNESS
SHALLOW J IIEMBANKMENTS I
EXCAVATIONS j If DIKES AND I
J 11 LEVEES I
I ---I -
I I SEVERE -WETNESS
I DWELLINGS I
I WITHOUT I
I BASEMENTS I
I I SEVERE -WETNESS JI 1 FROST ACTION
I DWELLINGS I I1 I
I WITH J II DRAINAGE 1
I BASEMENTS J I1 I
I I SEVERE -WETNESS II I WETNESS
I SMALL J If I
[.COMMERCIAL 1 - 11 IRRIGATION j
I BUILDINGS 1 If I
I_ --_ 1__ __—_ _-
I I SEVERE -LOW STRENGTH.FROST ACTION
I LOCAL I
ROADS AND 1
1 STREETS
I LAWNS. 1 MODERATE -WETNESS
ILANDSCAPING J
1 AND GOLF 1
J FAIRWAYS I
11 1 MODERATE -SLOW REFILL
11 EXCAVATED J
1J PONDS J
IIAOUIFER FED I
1J I WETNESS
I1 TERRACES J
JI AND J
11 DIVERSIONS 1
11 1 WETNESS
11 GRASSED I
11 WATERWAYS I
11 J
REGIONAL INTERPRETATIONS
I PASTURE I GROUP 3.
J AND I
IRAYLAND I 1
I-- - I ---
- _1
CANISTCU SEFIES
MNUJII
--_—---------- — ------------ —--- —_--_—__Eack ATI bA&_QLjELQPMSNI—_____—_
1 J Sr VFRF-WLINESS II 1 5EVERE-WL1 SS —
1 I ll I
J
I CAMP AN LAS ! IIPLAYGRUUNUS J I
1 J II 1 J
I ! MUDS FATE -WETNESS II I MODERATE -WETNESS f
I I II PATHS ] I
(PICNIC AREASI - I1 AND 1 1
I IJ TRAILS I 1
I—____--- — - ----------- 11-----------------------------------1
--_SAEA9iLlly ANQ_XILLP-E!ER_ASB€ OF CROPS_ALj.U_P6.tjjURE (HIGH LI;YEL MANAGEMENT)
J CLASS- J CAPA- f CORN I SOYBEANS J OATS I GRASS- I KENTUCKY ISROMEGRASS-I I
! OETLkMINING 1 81LITY 1 J 1 ILEGV14E HAY J 1 I BLUEGR A55 ALFALFA 1
PHASE J
!1-1J9sJ.LL_�stL 1 I eu 1 L( TON52� c au M 1 I_
R IIRR.-IWHR IIRR, INIRR IIRR-S�ML--1_------)
=��isL 11R�i_L N I R I1P�_IbU_R _i I R s:_lrli+l=l�tir3a_ I
TALL ] 2W I J IIO 1 ] 36 1_ 1 75 J 1 3.5.1 J 3.0 1 15.2 1 1 1 1
! I I J 1 1 1 I l I 1 t I 1 ! 1 1 1
I I I 1 I 1 ! J I 1 I I I ] 1 1 1 1
I 1 I I I I I I 1 I l I 1 1 1 I I 1
1 I 1 1 ! J I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I 1
1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I I
f 1 I I I t 1 I I 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 I 1
1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 I J 1 1 J I 1
I 1 I I I 1 1 1 ! I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 !
I I 1 I i I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1
1 1 1 l I I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I ] 1
- iIQSJoL9ND SUI7ABIL TTY __ __ _ _____
CLASS- i ORO J----__ MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS _ I POTENIjA1-eP0O0CT uTY I --
DETERMINING J SYM I ERUSIONJ EQUIP. ISEEOLINGI WINDTH.I PLANT I COMMON TREES .j SITE( TREES TO PLANT i
HAZARD I_L{MjT_ I MURjjY.I HAZARD I r1J'JPf1y.J _ _ .I INU%1
I I I ! 1 I I I NONE 1 ! I
! I 1 I I 1 ! 1 I ! J
I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1
I 1 J 1 I I 1 I I I 1
t I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1
I I I I t 1 I I I 1 1
1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 l 1
I I i 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1
1 I I I 1 I 1 ! I 1 I
I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I
1 I I I I I I I I 1 I
I 1 I 1 I 1 1 ! I 1 1
I i 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I
1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1
--- _--- jjWRBI<.AKS__Lt)L—_—_----
JCLASS-DE TERMIN-_ PMASEJ.— SPEC IFS-__ IHTI _ SP
IDRATNED LC1E5 Lill SPEs tcs I�SI—E€4SLS-______lt¢I
]EASTERN COTTUNWUOD 1451GOLDEN WILLOW 1321RUSSIAN-OLIVE JISISIBERIAN PEASHRUB
1 IB 1
JREOOSIER DOGWOOD
1 !BLUE SPRUCE 1l5JTATARIAN HONEYSUCKLEJB 1SIBERIAN ELM 1381GREEN ASH 12e1
1211PCNDER0SA PINE 1211SIBERIAN CRABAPPLE 116JEASTERN RLOCEDAR J1oJ
I I 1 1 I I 11 I I
1 I 11 I I 1 1 I I
— ---------
aL_J
I — _—_— _ +ILDLIF€YI"lJAl_.LTA8ZLITTY
CLASS- --_--____—_----__-_--_
^---+ POTENTIAL FOR Haj2HAE_LLEMf; TS --_� POiE HAUITAF
! DETERMINING 14GRAIN GIGRASS 61 WILD JHAROWD ICONIFERISHRUSS I WETLAND I SHALLOW] OPLNLD JM000 U1
I. PHA.�So—___--I SLED _jLEGUM�_HERB._I TREES IP IPLANTS 1WtlTLANDIRAN v`LL
LANTs l—_ I�AI�13-lYIILDLF 1WiL0L!—lyfiLSiJ.f_1WIIn1211
JALL I GOOD J GOOD I FAIR J FAIR ] FAIR I - J GOOD I GOOD J GOOD I FAIR J GOOC
I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I J ! J
I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1
I 1 1 ! 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1
I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1
POTENTIAL NATIVE- vl_ANT CUNMUNITY �4AN9F +Ny_OR FOREST NOERSTQ$Y_yf_QFjATI iSL-- _--__
I J PLANT I— PFI3CENTAGE C0 EgSITION (DRY WEIGHT) UY CLASS OETEHMINING PHA��--_I
1 COMMON PLANT NAME ] SYMBOL
P.NL!__—_—
I I I ! I 1 I I
I ! 1 I I I 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 I i I
I I ] ! 1 ] I I
1 I I I ! ! 1 1
] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 I ( 1 1 1 1
I 1 I 1 1 ! ! l
1 I 1 1 1 1 1 !
1 1 I 1 I ] 1 1
1 1 I 1 J I I t
I I I I I I I 1
J POTENTIAL PRODUCTION (LBS./AC. DRY WTI: I —-
__
1 FAVORABLE YEARS I J ! I I I
I NORMAL YEARS J J J J I 1
UNFAVORAULE YEARS
FOOTNOTES
A WINDBREAK GROUP 9. MN.
MNCO26 SOIL INTERPRETATIONS RECORD Get
MLRA(S1: 103 GLENCOE SERIES
REV. ARG-ELB. 12-78
CUMULIC HAPLAOUOLLS. FINE-LUAMY. MIXED. MESIC
THE GLENCOE SE.R1 Fi$. GLNSI.STS(,^e I?, DIED rS0OILSS F0RMED IN GLACIAL TILL IN DEPRESSIONS AND SWALES IN THE
UPLANDS. THE SURFACE LAYER IS BLACK AND VERY DARK -GRAN CLAY LOAM 3- INCH H K. `SUiiSOIL -IS Mdi VE-GRAY.
FRIABLE LOAM 13 INCHES THICK. THE UNDERLYING MATERIAL IS GRAYISH -BROWN AND LIGHT OLIVE BROWN LOAM. SLOPES ARE LESS
THAN 1 PERCENT. MOST AREAS ARt DRAINEC AND CROPPED.
J DEPTH f !_
IIIN.)J USDA TEXTURE
I
J
IFRACTIPERCENT OF MATERIAL LESS ILIOUID
JPLAS- I
I
UNIFIED I AASHTO
1>3 IN[THAN 3^ PASSING SIEVE NO, LIMIT
ITICITYJ
1 1
1
-I
I(PCTIJ 4 1 10 1 40]--ZOO I
IiND-u-I
I 0-351SICL• CL. L
JOL.
OH. MH. ML JA-7
I 0 1 100 95-100 85-98 75-90 1 445-60
110-20 1
135-48IL. CL, SICL
ICL
JA-7. A-6
I 0 1 100 95-100 05-98 75-90 1 35-50
115-25 1
148-601L. CL
I I
JCL
I
JA-6. A-7
i O 198-100 90-98 80-98 70-85 1 35-50
JIS-25 1
I I
I
IDEPTHICLAY (MOIST 8ULK1
1
PERHEA-
I
I AVAILABLE I SOIL J SALINITY
I I 1 I I
I--1—ORROSI ITY
1 SHRINK- JEROSIONJWINU JpRGANiCI CORFOSIVITY i
1(IN.)I(PCT I DENSITY I
BILITY
IWATER CAPACITYIREACTIONI ( MMHOS/CM)J SWELL 1FACTORSJEROD IMATTER 1
_i
1_ L52MM].LSSeLStL3) 1 (IN/HRI I IIN/IN) I (PHI 1 IPQ7EN7IALI K I T IGROUPI (PCT) I STEEL ICONCRJ<T�J
10-35125-3511 .35 -1. 45 1 0.2-2.0 1 0.18-0.22 16.1-7.8 1 - IMODERATE 1.281 5 1 6 1 5-10 1 HIGH 1-LLOWW_-1
J35-48J 25-?513 .35-1.50 1 0.2-2.0 J 0.15-0.19 16.6-7.8 1 - IMODERATE 1.281 1 1 1
148-60122-3211.35-1.50 1 0.6-2.0 I 0.15-0.19 17.4-7.8 1 - IMODERATE 1..281 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I
I FLOODING J HIGH WATER TABLE I CEMENTF0 PAN I BEDROCK IS 8SIDF_ 1HYDIPOTENT'LJ
PT DEH I KIND (MONTHS IDEPTHIHARONESSIDEPTH JHARDNESSIINIT.ITOTALIGRPI FROST I
I_ FR O N Y_ I -_DURATION (MONTHS 1 jF7I I I IsjN) I I (IN) I I(IN)-�j�!_1�-I ACTT ON_1
—NONE-RARE I I I *I-l..DIAPPARENTIOCT-JUNI - I I >tiU I I- I IB/01 HIGH -I
_ SANITARY FACILITIES G RUCTIO
I-- J SEVERE-PERCS SLOWLY.PONDING WEST lIHTRENGTH
ISEPTIC TANK J 1I 1 POOR-WETNESS•LOW STRENGTH
J ABSORPTION 1 IJ i
JJ ROADFILL I
J FIELDS 1 11 I
I SEVERE-PONDING
I SEWAGE 1
LAGOON 1
J AREAS 1
I SEVERE-PONDING.EXCESS HUMUS
I SANITARY 1
J LANDFILL I
i (TRENCH) I
1 SEVERE -PENDING
1 SANITARY J
1 LANDFILL 1
1 (AREA) J
I
I I PGOR-PONDING.HARD TO PACK
J DAILY J
J COVER FOR I
1 LANDFILL 1
I SE VERE-PONUIN .0 _
SHALLOW 1 ""
EXCAVATIONS J
I
IMPROBAELE-EXCESS FINES
11
II SAND
11 I IMPROBABLE -EXCESS FINES
II 1
11 GRAVEL 1
11 I
Ii J POOR -WETNESS
11 I
1I TOPSOIL 1
II I
II I MODERATE -SEEPAGE
11 POND J
1J RESERVOIR I
II AREA J
II
11EMBANKMENTS
11 DIKES AND
11 LEVEES
SEVERE -HARD TO PACK.EXCESS HUMUS•PONDING I
1 wr.wc SEVERE-PONDING. LOW STRENGTH
II
J MODERATE -SLOW REFILL
DWELLINGS
SEVERE-FLOOOS.PONDING.LOW STRENGTH
JJ EXCAVATED
WITHOUT
I -
1J PONDS
J
I BASEMENTS
1
JJAOUIFER FED
J
i
J 11wOm SEVERE-_ua2JN_G _.
11
I FROST ACTION•PONOING
DWELLINGS
J FWWW SEVERE-FLOODS.PONDI(!
JJ
1
WITH
JJ
II DRAINAGE
BASEMENTS
J
II
I
I
J M10M SEVERE-PUNDING.LOW STRENGTH
JJ
J PONDING
I SMALL
I mow: SEVERE-FLDODS.PONOING.LOW STRE(GTH
II I
COMMERCIAL
1
IRRIGATION I
IIUILDINGS
J B
I
J SEVERE-PGNDING.LOW STRENGTH.FROST ACTION
JJ J
PONDING
LOCAL
TERRACES I
I ROADS AND 1
11 AND J
1 STREETS i
IJ DIVERSIONS I
I LAWNS. I SEVE(E-PDNDING
WETNESS
ILANDSCAPING 1
IJ GRASSED I
I AND GCLF 1
II WATERWAYS I
I FAIRWAYS I
_ REGI
(PASTURE ANC I GROUP 6
1 HAYLAND J
I I
4 JAN 1979
CAPABILITY A(J'D YIEI,QS PER ACRE OF CROPS AND PASTU$€_ (HIGH LEVEL MANA�EMENi1
CLASS- I CAPA- I CORN I SOYBEANS I OATS I GRASS- JBROMEG RA55-1 REED !
I DETERMINING ! BILITY 1 I I ILEGUME HAY I ALFALFA ICANARYGRASS1
I PHASE 1 -- I (BU) 1 (BUJ 1 (BU). 1 (TONS) I (AUM) I _(AUM) I
. ..___. _....- ..... ... .... .... �... De �.00 (jyj RR IIRR. IS{j$R IIRR. INI g$�IRR. INI RR IIRR. 1
J 3.5 I i 5.2 I 15.5 I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I ! I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I 1 I I
I I I ! ! I I I I
I I I 1 ! I I I I
I I I I I i I I I
I I 1 I I I I I I
( POTENTIAL PRODUCTIVITY I I
J COMMON TREES ISITEI TREES TO PLANT J
NONE I I I
t I I I
I I I I
I I i I
i I f I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I 1
I I I I
I 1 I I
I 1 I I
I I I I
I I I I
1 I I I
JCLAaSS:DETER N-G PHASE] SPECIES IHTI SPECIES IHTI SPECIES — IHTI ___-Zp ,UES IHTI
(DRAINED JEASTERN COTTONWOOD 1601GREEN ASH 1301SIBERIAN CRABAPPLE 120IRLOOSIER DOGWOOD 115.1
I ISILVER MAPLE 135JEASTERN WHITE PINE 125IA14UR MAPLE 116IMEDIUM PURPLE WILLOW1141
1 IGOLDEN WILLOW 1351WHITE SPRUCE 1221NORTHERN WHITE-CEDAR1151TATARIAN HONEYSUCKLE1101
J 1 J J I I I I i t
I ! 11 J 1 I I I I
GLENCOE SERIES MN0026
_ RECREATIUNAL_OEVi�LOPMENT _
I I NCNE: SEVERE-PONOING II I SEVERE -PENDING — J
I I RARE: SEVERE-PONDING.FLUODS II I
1 CAMP AREAS I ((PLAYGROUNDS I
1 I II I 1
1 I SEVERE -PENDING 11 I SEVERE -PENDING 1
I I 11 PATHS I I
l PICNIC AREAS( 11 AND J 1
I I II TRAILS I 1
(DRAINED — J 3W I 1 85 J J 34 I 175 1
1 I I 1 I I 1 I I
I I I I I I I I I
J 1 I I I I I I I
J I I I I ! I I I
I I I 1 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I 1 I 1 I I I I
CLASS- I ORD I_- M NAGEMENT PROBLENS
DETERMINING ! SYM I EROSION( EQUIP. ISEEDLINGI WINOTH.1 PLANT
J—_ CLASS- I --POTENTIAL FOR HABITAT ELEMENTS I POTENTIAL AS HABITAT FOR: _I
DETERMINING (GRAIN FIGRASS EI WILD 1HARDWD JCONIFERISHRUSS IWETLANDISHALLCWIOPENLD IWOODLD IWETLANDIRANGELDI
1 PHASE_— 1 SEE ILEGUME I HERB I TREES (PLANTS ) (PLANTS 1 WATER I WI LOLF (WILD F I WXLDLF IOILDLF_I
JALL ! GOOD I GOOD I FAIR 1 FAIR I FAIR i - I GOOD I GOOD (GOOD I FAIR I GOOD
I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I
I 1 I I I I I ! I 1 I I I f
I 1 I 1 1 ! I I 1 I 1 I I I
1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I
_POTENTIAL__NAT VE PLANT COMMUNITY (RANGELAND OR FOREST UNDERSTORY VEGFJATIOH)-- --_
I J PLANT I PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION (DRY WEIGHT) BY CLASS DETERMINING PHASE
J COMMON PLANT NAME I SYMBOL I I I I I I
( NLSF N )
I 1 I 1 I 1 I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I 1 I I
1 I I I I I I
1 I I I I I I
I I 1 I I I I
I POTENTIAL PRODUCTION (LBS./AC. DRY WTI: I -- -
I FAVORABLE YEARS ! I I I
I NORMA6 YEARS I I 1 1
1--- — - UNPAVORABLE YEAR`------1-
-- FOOTNOTES
1 EXTENSIVE DIKING REQUIRED FOR STORAGE
A UNDRAINED: WINDBREAK GROUP 108. ON SITE ASSISTANCE NEEDED TO DETERMINE SPECIES: DRAINED: GROUP B. MN.
W I0045 S G I L I N T E R P R E T A T 1 O N 5 R E C C R O ed
MLRA(S): 95• L05 BCCTS SERIES
REV. FLA• 2-79 -
TYPIC MEDIHEMISTS. EVIL. MESIC
TOE B U. S SE S C S STS OF VERY POORLY DRAINED SOILS FORMED IN ORGANIC DEPOSITS MORE THAN $l INCHES THICK IN BUGS.
L KWiTCW_4"Ur9ZT�7�icl'Si-i'1'iY` "'ROY'K""8"-LT`+GHES TNICii: iRe'LOWER
LAYER IS DARK REDDISH BROWN MUCKY PEAT. SLOPES ARE LESS THAN 2 PERCENT. MOST AREAS ARE USED FCR WOODLAND.
I__-----
IDEPTH I
I
1
IFRACTIPERCENT OF MATERIAL LESS ILIOUIC IFLAS- I
I(IN.)I
USDA TEXTURE
I
UNIFIED I AASHTG
1>3 sNI THAN jt_EISAlIIS_SIEVE &s-I LIMIT ITIC17VI
1-19_ 1 +c L___-_—ttr>;AM_ I
10-1015P
IPT
IA-6
I D I I I I
Ito-601HM
I I
IPT
1
IA-8
1
I O I I I 1
i I I I I
1 I I
I 1
I I
I 1
1 I
i I
1 1 I I I
I
10EPTHICLAY
IMCIST BULK(
PERMEA-
I AVAILABLE 1 SGIAL L I SALINITY
R C S I V I T Y
1 9NP1NK- ZEROSlONIWlND (ORGANIC( CORRCSIVITY 1
I(IN.)I(PCT
I DENSITY I
BILLTV
IWATER CAPACITYIREACTIONI(MMMOS/CM)I SWELL I!6910.11EROD.INATTER
152mm+11(G/Cmj)1_31s►1!!E2__itlbabl-_I lPtll__L_�_—_JPG
l:tliiaLl_K 1_I_1SBaStE1_dESI�1.5IEEl_-i5t1SEE3AI
10-101 -
10.16-0.45 1
0.2-6.0
1 0.35-0.45 15.6-7.3 I
- 1 1- 1- I 3 1 60-.80 Inl7.4J:EdI€1__�Sy___i
110-601 -
10.16-0.28 1
0.6-6.0
1 0.35-0.45 15.6-7.3
I I
I I
I 1 1
i I I
I
FLOODING
R�HSN
_—_IHYCIPOTEN T•LI
�
OETON
DEPTH I HARDNESS I DEPTI, IHARONESSIINIT.ITOTALIGRPI FROST I
1,,,lS( •,=,acc�,�,lr�pS.l «Ne_—_1L9Y�lla21-Sl_is91+jP.YAnn I%IImw]Lwu 1�_1
Leo _--_11g9.aiMIA L311—_^A_4_^-_
I
I NONE.RARE: SEVERE-PONOING
II
{
POOR -WETNESS
(SEPTIC TANK
I OCCAS: SEVERE-FLOODS.PONOING
II
I
I ABSORPTION
(
11
ROADFILL 1
I FIELDS
I
If
I---
1------------------ -----u--------L-----
----------
1
( NONE: SEVERE-SEEPAGC.EXCESS HUMUS
II
I
IMPROBABLE -EXCESS FlhES
I SEWAGE
I RARE.00CAS: SEVERE-SEEPAGE.FL000S•
II
I
I LAGOON
I EXCESS NUMUS
II
SAND I
AREAS
I
II
I
1-----
1---------_____----_ —
�1�---_-_1--------------------
---------- -------
NONE.RARE: SEVERE-SEEPAGE•PCNOING
II
I
IMPROBABLE -EXCESS FINES
1 SANITARY
I CCCAS: SEVERE-FLGODS.SEEPAGE•PONOiNG
II
i
I LANDFILL
I
II
GRAVEL I
I (TRENCH)
(
II
1
I
I NONE.RARE: SEVERE-SEEPAGE.PONDSNG
IJ
I
POCR-EXCESS HUMUS.WETNESS-
I SANITARY
I OCCAS: SEVERE-FLOODS.SEEPAGE.PUNDING
II
I LANDFILL
I
1I
TOPSOIL .I
I (AREA►
I.
If
I
I--- —
1l___
I
______ _____—______----
POCK-PONDING.EXCESS HUMUS
II
DAILY
I
I I__--_--_—__�s�eaes�J:enl------------------
I COVER FUR
I
If
I
SEVERE -SEEPAGE
I LANDFILL
I
II
POND I
RESERVOIR I
If
AREA I
----__
1Lo[nA_3iit�171;lfCLSiYDtMT
15 VE RE-EXCE55 HUMUS.PONDING
II
I SEVERE -EXCESS HUNUS.PONQING
SHALLOW
I
IIENBANKMENTS
I
EXCAVATIONS
I
If DIKES AND
I
If LEVEES
I
—_--11--_--1—
----------------
1 M61106: SEVERE-PONDING LOW STRENGTH
II
( MODERATE -SLOW REFILL
DWELLINGS
I AMR;•OC A•5' S VERB-FLQ009 PpNQ I;NC+•
II EXCAVATED
I
WITHOUT
I LOW STRENGTH _
II PONDS
I
BASEMENTS
I
IIACUIFER FED
I
I >�: SEVERE-PONDING.LOW STRENGTH
I'I
I NONE•RARE: PCNOING.SUBSIOES
DWELLINGS
I i1ib0 - •
11
( CCCAS: FENDS NG.FLGCOS. SUBSIOES
WITH
I LOw
II ORAINA69
1
BASEMENTS
I
If
1
1 W0=6: SEVERE-PONDING•LSTR�EN4�Th•
II
I NCNE.RARE: PCNCING.SCIL BLCYING
SMALL
i QddlO.O C-2A5•: SEVIi RE-FAR.NOND ING.
11
I OCCAS: POND ING.SOiI BLGWiNG•FLCCGS
COMMERCIAL
1 •L0
If IRRIGATION
I
BUILDINGS
I
If
I
----
—_------— ----------
I M811011 i SEVERE -POND ING. FROST ACTION If
I PChD1NG.50IL BLOWING
I LOCAL
I OCCAS: SEVE6 )S.rlaaT
ACTAON 1I TERRACES
1
READS AND
F
11 AND
I
STREETS
I
If DIVERSIONS
I
_--
LAWNS.
i SEVERE-PONClhG.EXCESB HUMUS
II--
I WETNESS
LANUSCAPING
I
II GRASSED
I
ND GOLF
I
If WATERWAYS
I
AIRWAYS
PA
—
---_—_
----__ll___—_---1_.___—
_-----__—_____________
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
BCCTS SERIES
W10045
--HIS(jg.ATIONAL DIEXOEVELCPNENT
NONE: SEVERE-PONNG.CESS HUMUS 11 1 SEVERE -EXCESS HUMUS.PONOING — --- I
I I RARE.00CAS: SEVERE-FL000S.PCNOING. If I
CAMP AREAS i EXCESS HUMUS IIPLAYGROUNDS I I
If I I
I
SEVERE-PONOING.EXCESS HUMUS - If PATHS I SEVERE-PCNO ING •EXCESS HUMU5
I
(PICNIC AREASI 11 AND I
I I JI TRAILS I 1
1----1--------- -------------- _1L�--_l -- ------ ---_--_SBEbY�SL.IIY_AIS�ELjra�!_FE8_,eSBFi OF CA PS At1➢_PABT URE 11,1 EL NANAGEM __
EhIL—SA2_ ------
I CLASS- I CAPA- I CORN I CORN I OATS I GRASS- I KENTUCKY
I DETERMINING I SILITY 1 I SILAGE 1 ILEGUME HAY I BLUEGRASS I I 1
I PHASE I1—isS11--1_sI00121--1_— tau)
__i—SI9N51 1 (AUf�j_--1- - 1----------1
Ir—_—____ _—JrltQsltss=ltliss_1tB8�lntes es"Iss_ltes"ARR_lIRR. iNigE_IIRR. ss_1lel lniss_1tgsA_I
1CRAINEO 13W I 1100 I 1 IB ( 1 68 1 1 3.5
IUNORAINED 16r FLOODED 1 BW
I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I
I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1
I I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I
I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I
I i I I 1 I I i i 1 I I I I I I I 1
_..JGL➢1�nG_SSIi�AB1LITr _____ _______
1 --- CLASS- I ORD 1 _ _banACEMEbT 2621I aus
I DETERMINING I SYM I EROSIONI EOUiP. ISEEOLIMG1 WI NOTH.I PLANT I COMMON TREES ISITEI TREES TO PLANT I
I ---PHASE 1—�tlA2ARD-1LIMIT 1 MCRT•V,1 HA2AR 1 COME&7.1 _�;9aj i-__-- —I
1ALL I3W I SLIGHT ( SEVER E I SEVERE I SEVERE I SEVERE 1TAMARACK
I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 j
I 1 I I I 1 j j I I
1
I I I I 1 ( I I 1 I 1
I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I
1 I I 1 I I I I 1 I I
I I j
ISLAs>i_LF.TEAMIN•G PMASEI_____A^,eF�S1 �---_IHT I_—__ F.si�i$—�111IL_ SPECIES �jjj� ��EES1Fia3—_____1 11
1>30 MAP ICAROLINA POPLAR I6018ISERIAN CRABAPPLE I201REOCSIER OCGWOOC IS IJAPANESE TREE LILAC 1201
I (LATE LILAC 1121NANNYBERRV VIBURNUM I101CCMMDN NINEBARK Is I I I
I I I I I I I I
1<30 MAP (EASTERN COTTONWOOD I60ISILVER MAPLE 1351GCLOEN WILLCW I 1
13SIS 1BER IAN CRABAPPLE 1201
1 - IAMUR MAPLE 116JNCRTMORN WHITE-CEDARIISIGREEN ASH 13CIEASTERN WHITE PINE 1251
1---- — IWtlIIL_SQ9yGe 1$gDOs2eA DOGWOOD I1glb"'Up FUAPL 3Ll W!L!lIEIeBIdl�lsb€YSS�SlSlof1191
I CLASS- I - "'TAT ELEM _---
I DETERMINING IGAAIN b GRASS SI WILD RUBS '-'--------"-1—_ELO IWCCLLh_HA91INOIRAN ___I
I IHAROWD ICONIF EA ISHgUBS IWETLANDISMALLOWIOPE NLO (WOODED (WETLAND IRgNGELGI
I___`—Etl0SE _LSF.EL—lI,EGUME 1 HERB,� .Ig�IPIANT�_�___-1ELAnI� 1 rgiE9_1lSLpL�11YiLQLE�l3LpLE�Ltl3LLLf-I
IOAAINEO•UNORAINEO I GOOD I GOOD I POOR I GOOD I POOR ( - I GOOD I GOOD 1 GOOD I GOOD ( GOOD
IFLOOOEO 1 1
1 POOR I POOR I POOR I POOR I POOR I - I GGDO I GOOD I POOR I POOR I GOOD
1 I ! I I I I I I 1 I I I 1
I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I I
I I I I I ! I 1
I I I I I I
POTENTIAL -NATIVE PLANT fr,O MMUNI EI.dnL�9_POgE97_SIhfLJ:E5Ifl8YalESiEIAIiLhL--__._--------_
I I PLANT ; _ I ESybQII3jI19sl_SLHY_YE39IfI1�Y"LA.U_4EI. 9jhLNG PHASE -----I
I COMMON PLANT NAME I SYMBOL I I I I
I - ---—_1_INL5PnL1 ---- - ' ------ i ---- -i-- -—_L---- ------ IALASKA GOLOTHREAD I COTR2 I
ISUNCHBERRY DOGWOOD I COCAI3
[CANADA MAYFLOWER 1 MACA4 I I I I
IOWARF RED BLACKBERRY I RUPU
ITHREESEEOEC SEDGE
0
IAMERICAN STARFLOWER I TR802I
IAUSTRIAN WOOOFERN I ORAU4 I
I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I
I I I
I I I 1 1 I I 1
I I 1 1
—� __ -1-----------------�____-- _l_—_--____L_ 1--_ —I
I POTENTIAL PRODUCTION <LBS•/AG• DRY WT 1: i --
FAVORABLE YEARS -`---------
I NORMAL YEARS I I
1_-_— ---UNFAVORABLE YgAB,L
------------ —L__-__
A GRASS -LEGUME HAY YIELDS ARE FOR TIMGTHV-RED CLOViA NJ
MN0073 S O I L S U R V E Y I N T E R P F E T A T I O N S 1110
MLPA(S): 103. 56. 57. 102. 104. 105. E8. 90 MARSH
ARG.ELS. 12-73 '
AQUENTS AND HISTOSOLS
MARSH CONSISTS OF UNDRAINED DEPRESSIONS. SHALLOW LAKES. AND PONDS. THEY ARE VERY POORLY -DRAINED AND CONTAIN WATER MOST
E AREAS 'AlM-tl!WTMBY REGDS. SEDGEB_._XW5_A'0rHTS_. WITH SOME AREAS OF OPEN WATER. THE SOIL MATERIAL HAS
NOT BEEN CLASSIFIED. BUT IS COMMONLY FEATY MUCK.
—ESTIMATED
IDEPTHI I I IFRACTIPERCENT OF MATERIAL LESS (LIQUID IPLAS- I
I(IN.)I USDA TEXTURE I UNIFIED I AASHTO 1>3 INl �tletl_3eesSitlS_StEY�tlQ�_I LIMIT ITICITYI
I-----1------------------1—_—__-1_—--------lteczil--s---1--is1--1--�e--1-zs4--1-------linQEx_1
10-601VAR I I I I I I I
I 1 i I I I I I I
I 1 1 I I I I I I
1 t I 1 I I 1 t I
I I I I 1 I I I 1
IDEPTHIPERMEABILITYI AVAILABLE I SOIL I
SALINITY I SHRINK- I CORROSIVITY IEROSIONf WINO I
f(IN.)I (IN/HR) IWATER CAPACITYIREACTIONI(MMHOS/CM)1
SWELL I——IF-&MI3s1ER0D.I
I1 (IN/jyi I (PH) 1_
�EnIEtlileLl_SIEEL__lcflncaexEl_s_1_i_Lysouel
1 0-601 1
I I I I I
I
I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I 1 I 1
I I I 1 I
f____-1--- I--------L- I
I 1 1 I I
1 -1-------1--------1---1-------------------------------
I FLOODING_ 1_l;iEt'(EnIEQ_eSN_1____@EQ@l7lsl�—
1.�UllSI 0F.'S I NY D I POTENT 'LI
I --- — ------------ _ — I DEPTH
KIND MONTHS IDEPTHI HARDNESS I DEPTH IHARONESSIINIT.ITOTALIGRPI FROST I
I—FU.QMENGY_ 1. —DURATION—104ONTHS I (FT)
L—1---llitli_1-------- LtintI_—_—ltini_ls�n�l_—L6LiiG1LI
I_—_SQ11M0Lt_—_1—__YLLONG 1NflV-OCT1 ♦2-2.nIeEPAgE�lyy�oCT1
=_l� I_24Q-I-----1_---1---1_Q_1_------I
IEs
_
I I SEVERE-WETNESS.FLO00S
II I POOR -WETNESS 1
ISEPTIC TANK I
11 I
I ABSORPTICN 1
I1 ROADFILL I 1
1 FIELDS 1
11 f I
1--------1--------r_
-----1L------1------------------- -------------- I
I I SEVERE -WETNESS
— -----
11 1 UNSUITED I
I SEWAGE I
II I I
1 LAGOON I
II SAND 1 I
AREAS 1
II f I
--__------1----_-------
--- I I 1
I I SEVERE -WE THE SS•FL0OD9
--_ --______________---_--__—_— —1
II I UNSUITED '
I SANITARY I
II I I
I LANDFILL I
II GRAVEL I f
I (TRENCH) I
II I
------_�—--------
I
------11------------ 1------------------=-------------I
I I SEVERE-WETNESS.FLOODS
II I POOR -WETNESS I
SANITARY 1
I I 1
I LANDFILL I
If TOPSOIL 1 I
I
I (AREA) 1
11 I
-----1------
I
_—_-11---------1------------------- —-----
I I POOR -WETNESS
------------I
11
I DAILY 1
II -----------__
I, COVER FOR
II I
I LANDFILL I
f
POND
I-------1_---_ ---- —
—I I RESERVOIR 1 f
I
If AREA I I
—_—__—_--__ _ LQMMSBIIX-1iE�lEL0PMENT
11--__-___1-__---_------_
L'
SHALLOW I
IIEMBANKMENTS I I
EXCAVATIONS I
11 DIKES AND I I
I
II LEVEES I
I
1 SEVERE- WETNE S3.FL0003
r�
II I FAVORABLE I
DWELLINGS I
II EXCAVATED 1
WITHOUT 1
I1 PONDS I
BASEMENTS f
IIAQUIFIER FE01 1
-------1-------
---_ll—---------- 1-------------------
I SEVERE-W TNESS.FLOODS
— --------
II I WETNESS.POOR OUTLETS
DWELLINGS 1
II 1
WITH I
II DRAINAGE 1
P.ASEMENTS I
1
II f
---------1----- —
i
---11---------1--------------------------
I S_E_VE RE-WET_NES_S. FLOOD S
----I
II I '-
SMALL I
COMMERCIAL 1
II IRRIGATION 1
BUILDINGS I
11 I I
------------1---------- --
f
--_r ll---------1-----------------------------
I SEVERE-WETNESS.FLOODS
--------------
II I NOT NEEDED
RAND I
II TERRACES f
ROADSLOC
1
I
AND
I! 1
S TREETS 1
I
11 DIVERSIONS 1 I
------1------------- -
-----11-------- 1--------
LAWNS.
ILANDSCAPING 1
I
---------------------------
If I NOT NEEDED — --'I
I
AND GOLF 1
II GRASSED I
II WATERWAYS I
I FAIRWAYS I
I
II
1 _-------1------ ----------- ----------------11------------1---------------------------
I
f
-----------I
-------------)iESeSIItl9L
[PASTURE AND I GFOUP 11
IHAYLAND I
1
1
1
I
•ilvb O1 n19VIdM OJl 1
•31Vd Ol 3l9vlbvA -01 dbV 5y1113a01, 11Js O31r wI lS3 v
I. S31CN1003 T-------_____-_J--------------T----------T--------------T----- ------------------ --il
1 Y 1 I 1 1 Sb V3A 1VNdDN 1
1 1 1 I 1 I 51-V3A 919VdDAV3 , I--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------ J-------------- J-------------- T-------------- -
-------------t --- Ad0 •0 V/•55. 11 NUI1 On DO '1d lVllh sl �� I
1 I
I 1 I I I I
I I I I I 1 I I
I I I I I
I 1 I 1 I I I l
I I I I I ( I h
I 1 1 I
I i I I I
I I
I i -------1 I 1 1 1
I--------------J------- J-----.---------T--------------T-------------T-iR3S1R7`T-------------------------------1�
I I I I I I 10aWAi I 3NVN INV1d NUWNOJ
I------94VRa-•SRTF7w93I1t1`SS01�`x8-iZARi3A`7IaaT-RaTITSadr7t7T3SVIR33B3a"-`l 1Nvld I
-----------------------TRCII9I3'S3�-zHCIS83aAf1'I53BC3-A7-aR913'SRQBT�ITIQRF`W15-IAOT3"�FTIVR-1�iIa32�------------ ---I�
t------T------- T------- T------- T ------- T------- T------- ------- J------- T--- ---J----------------------
1;
1 I I I I I I I F 1 1 I I
I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I
1 - I oOo9 I1 daoe •nldocd •nI Geoe ► 0009 t - Food •Aldood •AId3Do •AId3Dd •AldoOd 'Al �'iVjl
I-31a1rwJ-��a1rz<T-3�a17IIJ-31a1T1T`83I9*`T-sIR9�aT-------T-sIRv1aT-S338I-T-T393a-T��rt�sa�T--aaas-T-------a,va�-------I.
10139NVdl ONV113MI 01000M1 01N 3C0IMOl�VNS.t ONV113M1 s9ndNSId3dINOJI amotioHl 01IM 13 SSWdDI3 NIVd9l ON 114 IWI3a
1___F8a3`IVII&9A-Ci`1VTIR3IDa---T------- ---------3IR3R313-IVITQ9A`13Q3-1VTIR3I6a------ --------
1 -Ssrl: ,
------------------------------- ---------------- 7CIT1T09ITrts`I9IT1AiA'3371a1TII"------------------------------=---
--T--------------------T--T-------------------- T--T----- -----------T—T----------- ------
1 I I I 1 I I I I l
I I I I I I I I I i
I I I I ( I 1 I 3NON I I
IIAT------- S3T73a3------ JIa7------- 1WI123------ TIAT----- —VlMaS------ TIRT-----19773a5_-- --J3S`�iHa_�5-ATwB3I3a=SSv131�
------------------------------------- ------------------sAV3duaRTnI---------- ------
1-----------------------T----T--------------------T--------J-------J-------J--------T------ T---T------------------ll
1 1 I I I I 1 I I I II
I I I 1 I I I 1 I I II
I I I I 1 I I I I I I
I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I I'
I I I I I 1 I I I I II
I I I I I I I I 1 I 1
I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 II
I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I
I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I
I I I I I I I I I 1 I
I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I
I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I
fI I 3--I____________________ '_TAaRTT---------------`-` ------3Svaa--------I.
t INV1d 01 53301 131Is1 S33tl1 1NV1dUdW1 I 1NVid I•NIGNIM IONI1033SI •dino3 INOISOd3 IwASI 9NINIWd0130 1'
I 1`-xIT7ITISISa CBa-19TIR3ZLa-T--'--'-----'Sii31QtS8a IR•�NOR9M-"-""'IOd01 -a501i
------------- ----------------------- ----------------7CIT1Tt3OITlS3-QRVTaS'J----- ----------------------------------
-----J-----J-----T-----J-----J-----T-----T-----T-----J-----T----T---T-----T----T---J---T----------------------,
I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I 1 I I I I i 1 I I I I I I I I
I I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I
I I I t I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I
I I I I I I I I 1 I Y I I 1 I I I I
I 1 I I i I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I 1 I I I t t I I I ( I I f
I 1 I t 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I
t 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I i I I 1 I I
I i I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I f I I
I I I I ! t I_ I I I t I I I I I M3 I llrl
-887 --------------
1----------T----TT-----T------ -8 TRY---T----------T----------- T88IT`BATRT-*3aTT-88IRT-----8TRT"—" I
I-----------T-----------T-----------T-----------J-----------J---------J---------T-------1 3svHd l
1 I I I I I 1 i kit1113 I ONINIWd313O I
-vdv:> I -ssr1�
---"`-`----------- T11RIN1S9R9W-111G11-A•STAT--3&1tI39a-dR9`-83 == Sa13T3-a3ISTd38d�AV`II71T9Va75""`-'-""-"-
,
------ ------
T------------TT-------------- T----- ,
--------------------------------------------
I I slt vbl 11
1 I
I I ONV II Isr3b• 7IN�tol
I 1 SHIVd tl I I
I SS3N13M-3b3n3S I 11 SS3N13M-3b3A3S I I
1--------------------------------------------T------------TT----------------------------- -------------- T----------- I
1 I II 1 I
I I sONnod�Avldll I wads dwr0 I
1 I II I I
SS3N13M-3b3A3S I II S53Nt3M-�tl3A3S 1 I
------------------------------------------------------NUTI93831-b---------------------------------------------
etDONW .3ji.
PLANNING COMMISSION L 4UTES
JUNE 8,' 1983
PAGE 1�Q.1
Ryan moved, seconded by Albee, that the Planning Commission
recommend that the City Council approve the final development
plan amendment for the northeasterly most 7.8 acres of the Near
Mountain Project as proposed with the following conditions:
1. That the roadways are to be constructed to City standards.
2. That the model unit to be constructed not be occupied until
provision of full public improvements to the site have been
initiated, and
3. That proposed covenants and restrictions are subject to City
Attorney approval.
Vote unanimous, motion carried.
Replat of Outlots H and I of Chanhassen Lakes Business Park
(Chanhassen Lakes Business Park Third Addition)
Michelle Foster a representative of Opus Corporation was in
attendance.
Waibel briefly explained that the proposal is to replat the 113.9
acres contained in Outlots H and I of Chanhasssen Lakes Business
Park into three industrial development sites (Lots 1 and 2, Block
2 and Lot 1, Block 1) and three outlots. Due to the applicants
plan to only construct the street section from County Road 17 to
the easterly line of proposed Outlot B, the only area eligible
for imminent development would be that having improved street
frontage..
Noziska moved, seconded by Jim Thompson, that the Planning
Commission recommend that the City Council approve the prelimi-
nary plat for Chanhassen Lakes Business Park Third Addition as
depicted on the preliminary plat official file copy for Planning
Case 83-4 Subdivision, dated received May 5, 1983 Chanhassen
Community Development Department with the condition that:
1. The applicant dedicate all drainage and ponding easements as
required by the City Engineer, and
2. That individual lots within the plat are not eligible for
development until such time as extension of full sewer, water
and street improvements have been initiated.
Vote unanimous, motion carried.
Meeting adjourned at 11:13 p.m.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1983
PAGE 9
Not Identified: I just happen to think, would the City of
Chanhassen be willing to buy the property and make it into a park
area for the kids. We are kind of limited, we have one picnic
table down there on Highway 7 and that's our park.
Martin: There is a neighborhood park, it's called Herman Field.
It is just to the southwest of this area but I don't think it's
fully developed yet.
William Ziegler: I would like
north of our property (Baltic)
without a permit?
to know about that house just
how they can rent the property
Martin: We are aware of the situation.
Allen Putnam: Just one final comment, I would request that the
Planning Commission consider the many people who could suffer and
their property values versus the few people who might gain by
this.
Noziska moved, seconded by Albee to close the public hearing, all
voted in favor and the motion carried.
The Commissioners agreed that there were to many questions
unanswered that there are no provisions here; it's not improving
the local neighborhood; there are no provisions for the adjoining
property owners. They felt that they should know what the pro-
perty across the road is planned for by Shorewood and just to
take a look at the entire area.
Noziska moved, seconed by Ryan, to table the item in lieu of the
staff providing us with additional information that we need to
more thoroughly analyze the situation. Vote unanimous, motion
carries.
Final Development Plan Amendment Request, Near Mountain P.R.D.,
Lundgren Brothers, Inc.
Dennis Mulvey, a representative from Near Mountain explained that
the request of the proposal is to amend the Near Mountain Final
Development Plan to construct 31 small lot single family detached
dwelling units in the northeasterly most 7.8 acres previously
approved for 36 quad home units.
Bill and Sharon Anderson were present for this public hearing and
expressed concern of the public hearing that approved the final
development on Near Mountain. They were not even aware of this
proposal and said that they were sure none of their neighbors
knew anything about this. They were also concerned about the
traffic that would be generated from this development.
Attachment #4
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT,
THE NEAR MOUNTAIN PRD,--LUNDGREN BROTHERS, INC., CHANHASSEN,
MINNES�iA.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Planning Commission of the
City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, will meet on Wednesday the 8th day
of June, 1983, at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall, 690 Coulter Drive
for the purpose of holding a public hearing to consider a final
development plan amendment to change the designated land use for
a portion of the Near Mountain Project from 36 units of fourplex
to 31 small lot detached single family residential units. The
area for which this plan amendment is proposed contains approxi-
mately 7.8 acres lying in the southwest corner of the intersec-
tion of Townline Road and State Hwy. 101 (see attached map).
A plan showing said proposed final development plan amendment is
available for inspection at City Hall. All persons interested
may appear and be heard at said time and place.
By Order of the Planning Commission
r
Bob Waibel, City 'Planner
(Publish in the Carver County Herald May 25, 1983.)
0 0 0 F 0 0
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c
(M LID 0
I I;r
CHRIS TAIA S I HENNEPINI COUNTY
LAKE CARVER COUNTY
Area of proposed Final
Development Plan Amend-
E ment- Near mountain PRD.
Lundgren Bros. inc.
P AN w
ZI
<
LLJ W
_j
O
O
A
Z I
IV to
Qj PARK z x
<
M
I WA H
RVER B >
I Ul
CREE
rn E Qj _PAJ
F�6N
Er fAW q/P
P
J L OTUS'l"
R
01%r_N TS )V
�� _ / R W
H 0
LA
o 0
M LAKE
-7
00 0".
DR
Attachmen': #1 1400
C)
C)
SARA C)
LE cr
7 A
5
ir
r- •
-35-
PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (PRD)
or CASE NO. PRD/PCD
PLANNED CCtiLMUtiITY DEVELOPMENT (PCD)
City of Chanhassen
Carver and Hennepin Counties, Minnesota
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST -
Date of .Application May 10; 1983'.,
Escrow Paid Date'
Received. by ........ _...
Applicant Name:
Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc.
... .... .
Last First Initial
935.E. Wayzata Blvd. Wayzata MN. 55391 .
Address: _
Number aP_i Street City State zip code
Owner: Near Mountain Properties c/o Russell W. Lindquist
Last First - --- Xn�,t al
Address• 2300 First National Bank Bldg. Mpls. MN.: -55402-
.Number and Street City -------- -State - -�—Zip Code
Address of property in question:
South
Legal description of property in question:
See Attached Sheet
Present zoning of property: P-1 Planned Residential District --
Present use of property: Agri cul tural
Proposed use of property: ^_ Single Family Residential The following documents shall be attached to this application:
Date Received initial
1. Sketch Plan
2. Preliminary Development Plan
3. Escrow Account
--3 4 -
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING ADIIINISTIt-T�.T IVE FOM,1 ENTITLED:
APPLICATION FOR' CON SIDE F.ATION OF PLA?�TIV:LivTG REQUEST, PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OR PLANNED CO21,R,IUNITY DEVELOPMENT.
(Note: This instruction sheet should be given to each applicant -
petitioning for planned development).
1. The applicant should become familiar with the provisions set -
forth in Ordinance 47 as amended entitled "Chanhassen Zoning
Ordinance," and the City Administrative Procedures Manual..
2. -Case No., escrow paid and date will be filled out by the
Administrator; or any other authorized person charged with accepting
forms for the Planning Commission.
3. Applicant refers to the person actually submitting the form,
if different than owner. If applicant is also the owner, write
"same" after "name." Address refers to the applicants nailing address
4. Owner refers to the actual person holding title to the property
in question; it does not -refer to a contract buyer, renter, or
lessee. Address refers to the owners mailing address.
5. Address of Property in question refers to subject property
street name and number. If the property is undeveloped., the address
may be obtained from the City Building Inspector.
6. Legal Description of property in question refers to the lot
number, block number and name of subdivision, or if unplatted, the
meets and bounds description or registered_ land survey as recorded
of the subject property. This information may be obtained from the
Carver County Register of Deeds, located in the County Courthouse,
Chaska, Minnesota.
7. Present zoning of property refers to the specific zoning district
in which the property is located.
8. Present use of property refers to the existing land use, i.e.,
single family residential, office building, agricultural, etc.
9. Proposed use of property refers -to the specific improvement- =
intended for the property in question.
10- Documents attached are required by City Ordinance 47, Section 14.:
11. The remaining portion of the application is for administrative use.
--36-
Date Received initia:
4. Abstractor's Certificate _
5. Final Development Plan
1 hereby declare that all statements made in this application and on
the attached documents are true, and that S shall reimburse the
City for all expenses incurred in processing this application for
planned unit development.
Signature of Applicant
Peter Pflaum, Pres. Lundgren Bros.
.e i .... I Canatr. , Inc.
Signatur of Owne
May 10,i 1983
Date
Received by Title_ Da
(Following to be completed by Aoning Administrator or City Official)
CHRONOLOGY
DATE
BY
Sketch Plan on Planning Commission Agenda
Planning Commission Postponed to
Preliminary Development Plan on
Planning Commission Agenda
Planning Commission Postponed to
Newspaper Publication
Adjacent Property Owners Notified
Publ1c Hearing
Planning C Commission Action
Preliminary Development -Plan on
Council Aqenda
_
Council Post oned to
Council Action
Preliminary Development Plan Contract
Final Development Plan or
Planning Commission Agenda
P1�znninq Co nmzssion Postponed to
Final Development Plan on Council Agenda
_.
to
-Council—Postponed
Final Development Plan Contract Execu-t
Escrow Returned -• Amount:
--3 7 --
PLANNING COI-I%LILSSION RECOZD,iENDATION (Preliminary Development Plan)
On this day of 19 , this PRD/PCD
was recommen ed for (approval), disapproval subject to the
following Conditions:
Chairman -of Planning Commissic
Action by City - Preliminary Development Plan
On this day of 19 , the Chanhassen - City
Council, CarveE:--anZ1 Hennepin Counties, " 41—nnesota (approved) , (a.isapprc
this Preliminary PRD/PCD subject to the following conditions:
Attest:
City A mznistratoi
By order of the Chanhassen
City Council
-
mot...
.- -
.!.
Mayor
• We `}a•�
Council Meeting March 21—'1983 -10
Mayor Hamilton - If in fact that is the case, I would like to have a
second opinion. I would like to have the agreement reviewed that we
have currently with the ready mix and review this proposal and give
a second opinion.
rl---�
pt
us
Councilwoman Swenson - You may remember that about 12 or two years ago
we were in court with this company and it was made quite clear to them
that we didn't care for intensification. Subsequently they put up another
silo without a permit. It is now laying down on the ground and making the
area look even worse than it did before. One thing I would like to know
is where the water is going now? I would like to have an opinion, if we
disturb the existing agreement at all, does this leave us open for more
requests from them?
Bob Waibel - This could be considered as an alteration rather than an
enlargement or an intensification of their use.. It is not expanding their
capacity as a plant. It simply appears to have environmental benefits to
the methods that are being used right now for disposal of the partial
loads, clean out activities, as well as reduce the volume that would be
needed to be disposed of in a solid waste landfill sites. If we could
document that there is an environmental problem right there now, we
could possibly have them install this as an enforcement action.
Councilwoman Swenson - What is happening with the water now?
Bob Waibel - Right now they are pumping approximately 600 to 700 gallons
per partial truck load and it's washed into a pit on the western portion
of the property. There probably is some seepage there. It will dehydrate
and solidify and then it probably would be not much of an environmental
problem. They do have some fly ash that is used in filler material and
may have some trace elements that go into the soil or water table. To
what degree? PCA does not know.
Scott Martin - This request would allow them to recycle their water.
Mayor Hamilton moved to table action until either a representative from
Apple Valley Red-E-Mix or the manufacturer is present. Motion seconded
by Councilman Geving. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton,
Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative
votes. Motion carried.
NEAR MOUNTAIN ASSESSMENT REVIEW: Sherman Goldberg was present. Lundgren
Bros. is requesting the abatement of 13 sewer and water lateral assessments
that were placed along Pleasant View Road because they will be constructing
sewer and water laterals in Near Mountain Blvd. and will not benefit from
the existing laterals. Staff recommended denial of the request.
Mr. Goldberg asked if these assessments could be spread over all the lots
in Near Mountain once the plat is filed. The City Engineer stated he felt
this could be handled administratively if a letter of consent is received
from the owners. Mayor Hamilton requested that this item be placed on
a future consent agenda.
Council Meeting Ma h 21, 1983
sea
Councilman Horn - But, if the Judge has said that Ordinance 45 is not
valid, us taking that action really will have no effect.
Don Ashworth - There is a definition question and that's what Al was
speaking about before, in terms of prior to 1977. There is a section in
that ordinance that deals with parcels of 22 acres, that had been since
1977 interpreted by the attorney's office to mean that that only applied
to parcels as of record in 1971. Otherwise you could have no subdivision
whatsoever and the court took the other interpretation. I think if this
Council would instruct city staff to interpret that ordinance in
accordance with what the court interpretation was. I still have deep
concern about somebody coming in potentially on 5 or 101, there should
be some allowance in there to insure that all access should be maintained
through an internal road if more than one lot or something like that so
that you can assure that you would not have Highway 5 with continuous
lots. This would be first reading and in bringing it back for second
reading staff could attempt to place into this interim ordinance those
type of guidelines that might be workable.
Councilman Horn - I think we are pretty much in agreement on what we want.
It's just a matter of how we get there.
Mayor Hamilton moved to recognize Ordinance 45 as still an existing ordi-
nance and place on first reading Ordinance 64C as an interim ordinance
adopting only Section 6 and direct staff to add a section that internal
access must be provided for subdivisions of two or more lots. Motion
seconded by Councilman Horn. The following voted in favor: Mayor
Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No
negative votes. Motion carried.
NON -CONFORMING USE PERMIT FOR INSTALLATION OF A WASH -OUT SYSTEM, APPLE
VALLEY RED-E-MIX PLANT:
Mayor Hamilton - This is an item that we have all discussed at one time or
another in years past. At one time we had felt that there should be no
intensification of the ready mix facility. They have come in now asking
to have a wash -out system. Craig Mertz has stated that he felt that an
agreement could be reached whereby if a wash -out system were to be put in
it would not jeopardize the 1986 agreement with the City and the ready
mix that they would vacate their facility at that time. That's the one
thing that I am mostly concerned about is that by intensifying the use
of that area, which I see this as doing, that it does not jeopardize that
agreement.
Bob Waibel - That would be one of the conditions as recommended by the
Planning Commission and staff that they hold the City harmless from any
added costs or investment made for the installation of this system.
Mayor Hamilton - Did Russ or Craig review this?
Bob Waibel - Russ did. He felt there were no problems as long as they
agreed to terminate their use as the City would enforce its ordinance or
in the case of a public acquisition. They would agree to terminate the
use but they would also not ask for any added compensation for this
particular facility.
Council Meeting Mai 21, 1983 ( -11-
Councilwoman Swenson moved to deny the request as presented and instruct
the City Engineer to place on a future agenda the spreading of the
existing assessments over the entire development. Motion seconded by
Councilman Horn. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton,
Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative
votes. Motion carried.
1983/1984 INTOXICATING AND NON -INTOXICATING -LIQUOR LICENSES: Eleanor
Kottke, representing Women Against Drunk Drivers, spoke on what the
organization is trying to accomplish in getting people to understand that
they should drink responsibly.
Councilman Horn moved that the following licenses be renewed for 1983/1984
Bloomberg Companies, Inc. Kenny's Super Market
On -Sale Intoxicating Off -Sale Non Intoxicating
Sunday Sales
On -Sale Non Intoxicating Superamerica
Off -Sale Non Intoxicating Off -Sale Non Intoxicating
Kallestad Enterprises, Inc.
On -Sale Intoxicating
Sunday Sales
Pauly's, Inc.
On -Sale intoxicating
Off -Sale Intoxicating
Sunday Sales
Riviera Club, Inc.
On -Sale Intoxicating
Sunday Sales
Chanhassen Legion Post #580
Club License
Sunday Sales
Motion seconded by Mayor Hamilton.
Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and
negative votes. Motion carried.
Bluff Creek Golf Assn.
On -Sale Non Intoxicating
Holiday Sttionstores
Off -Sale Non Intoxicating
JGM Liquor Warehouse
Off -Sale Intoxicating
Chanhassen Fire Department
On -Sale Non Intoxicating
Saint Hubert's Church
On -Sale Non Intoxicating
(Valid for six, one -day
events)
The following voted in favor: Mayor
Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No
Staff noted that the Non Intoxicating Off -Sale License for Quick Stop
Groceries has been revoked due to Mr. Peterson's failure to provide the
dram shop insurance coverage as required under state law.
APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZATION FOR
SOLICITATION OF BIDS, RICE MARSH LAKE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS:
RESOLUTION #83-10: Mayor Hamilton moved the adoption of a resolution
approving the construction plans and specifications and authorizing
the solicitation of bids for Rice Marsh Lake Drainage improvements.
Resolution seconded by Councilman Horn. The following voted in favor:
Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and
Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried.
MTC OPT OUT PROGRAM: Mayor Hamilton presented a status report of Opt Out
activities with surrounding cities. Representative Chuck Dimler explained
the new legislation affecting this program.
Council Meeting March 1983 ;, -12-
1982 SURFACE WATER MANAuEMENT LAW: The City Engineer discussed some of
the pertinent information in the law:
1. The City is responsible to define the boundaries of the watershed
and establish a Watershed Management Organization in the form of
a watershed district or a joint powers agreement by December 31, 1983.
If not completed by that date, the County becomes the agency
responsible for establishing a watershed district.
2. The Watershed Management Organization must complete a Watershed
Management Plan (through 1990) by Decemb.er 31, 1985.
3. Municipalities are then required to prepare local management plans in
conformance with the district plan within one year of the overall
plan's adoption.
A motion was made by Councilman Geving and seconded by Mayor Hamilton to
adjourn. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen
Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion
carried. Meeting adjourned at 11:00 p.m.
Don Ashworth
City Manager
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1983
PAGE 9
Not Identified: I just happen to think, would the City of
Chanhassen be willing to buy the property and make it into a park
area for the kids. We are kind of limited, we have one picnic
table down there on Highway 7 and that's our park.
Martin: There is a neighborhood park, it's called Herman Field.
It is just to the southwest of this area but I don't think it's
fully developed yet.
William Ziegler: I would like to know about that house just
north of our property (Baltic) how they can rent the property
without a permit?
Martin: We are aware of the situation.
Allen Putnam: Just one final comment, I would request that the
Planning Commission consider the many people who could suffer and
their property values versus the few people who might gain by
this.
Noziska moved, seconded by Albee to close the public hearing, all
voted in favor and the motion carried.
The Commissioners agreed that there were to many questions
unanswered that there are no provisions here; it's not improving
the local neighborhood; there are no provisions for the adjoining
property owners. They felt that they should know what the pro-
perty across the road is planned for by Shorewood and just to
take a look at the entire area.
Noziska moved, seconed by Ryan, to table the item in lieu of the
staff providing us with additional information that we need to
more thoroughly analyze the situation. Vote unanimous, motion
carries.
Final Development Plan Amendment Request, Near Mountain P.R.D.,
Lundgren Brothers, Inc.
Dennis Mulvey, a representative from Near Mountain explained that
the request of the proposal is to amend the Near Mountain Final
Development Plan to construct 31 small lot single family detached
dwelling units in the northeasterly most 7.8 acres previously
approved for 36 quad home units.
Bill -and Sharon Anderson were present for this public hearing and
expressed concern of the public hearing that approved the final
development on Near Mountain. They were not even aware of this
proposal and said that they were sure none of their neighbors
knew anything about this. They were also concerned about the
traffic that would be generated from this development.
PLANNING COMMISSION L.jgUTES
JUNE 8, 1983
PAGE 10
Ryan moved, seconded by Albee, that the Planning Commission
recommend that the City Council approve the final development
plan amendment for the northeasterly most 7.8 acres of the Near
Mountain Project as proposed with the following conditions:
1. That the roadways are to be constructed to City standards.
2. That the model unit to be constructed not be occupied until
provision of full public improvements to the site have been
initiated, and
3. That proposed covenants and restrictions are subject to City
Attorney approval.
Vote unanimous, motion carried.
Replat of Outlots H and I of Chanhassen Lakes Business Park
(Chanhassen Lakes Business Park Third Addition)
Michelle Foster a representative of Opus Corporation was in
attendance.
Waibel briefly explained that the proposal is to replat the 113.9
acres contained in Outlots H and I of Chanhasssen Lakes Business
Park into three industrial development sites (Lots 1 and 2, Block
2 and Lot 1, Block 1) and three outlots. Due to the applicants
plan to only construct the street section from County Road 17 to
the easterly line of proposed Outlot B, the only area eligible
for imminent development would be that having improved street
frontage.
Noziska moved, seconded by Jim Thompson, that the Planning
Commission recommend that the City Council approve the prelimi-
nary plat for Chanhassen Lakes Business Park Third Addition as
depicted on the preliminary plat official file copy for Planning
Case 83-4 Subdivision, dated -received May 5, 1983 Chanhassen
Community Development Department with the condition that:
1. The applicant dedicate all drainage and ponding easements as
required by the City Engineer, and
2. That individual lots within the plat are not eligible for
development until such time as extension of full sewer, water
and street improvements have been initiated.
Vote unanimous, motion carried.
Meeting adjourned at 11:13 p.m.
�i
` REGULAR CF'--�,HASSEN CITY COUNCIL MEETING JU'^��21, 1983
Mayor Hamilton called the meeting to order with the following members present:
Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilman Geving. Councilman Horn was absent.
The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Councilman Geving moved to approve the agenda with the
following inclusions: Sale of Bonds, Clean up around Colonial Center,
Semi -Trailers. Motion seconded by Councilwoman Swenson. The following voted in
favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilman Geving. No
negative votes. Motion carried.
CONSENT AGENDA: Item (d) was removed from the Consent Agenda to be discussed
separately. Councilwoman Watson moved to approve the following Consent Agenda
items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations:
a. Minnewashta Manor Homeowner's Association Maintenance Proposal,
Sandpiper Trail.
b. Construction Plans and Specifications, Phase I, Near Mountain.
c. Control Panel and Electrical Maintenance Agreement, City Well System.
e. Cable Service Territory Application, Minnesota Cable Communications
Board.
Motion seconded by Mayor Hamilton. The following voted in favor: Mayor
Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilman Geving. No negative
votes. Motion carried.
SALE OF BONDS: Andy Merry, Juran and Moody, discussed the pending sale of bonds
during the month of July.
RESOLUTION 183-29A, B & C: Councilman Geving moved the adoption of Resolution
83-29A requesting the extension of the qualification period of MBIA insurance
coverage for the not to exceed $5,185,000 General Obligation Tax Increment
Refunding Bonds of 1983 and' the not to exceed $4,350,000 General Obligation
Improvement Refunding Bonds of 1983; Resolution 83-29B Authorizing the Sale of
$5,185,000 General Obligation Refunding Tax Increment Bonds of 1983; and
Resolution 83-29C Authorizing the Sale of $4,345,000 General Obligation
Refunding Improvement Bonds of 1983. Resolutions seconded by Councilwoman
Watson. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and
Watson, Councilman Geving. No negative votes. Motion carried.
MAPLE LEAF AWARD: Bill Gullickson, former HRA Chairman, was presented with a
Maple Leaf Award for his outstanding work and dedication to the City.
MINUTES: Councilwoman Watson moved to note the May 25, 1983, Public Safety
Commission minutes. Motion seconded by Mayor Hamilton. The following voted in
favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilman Geving. No
negative votes. Motion carried.
Councilwoman Watson moved to note the June 7, 1983, Park and Recreation
Commission minutes. Motion seconded by Councilman Geving. The following voted
in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilman Geving.
No negative votes. Motion carried.
BILLS: Councilman Geving moved to approve the bills as presented: Checks
#14587 through 14661 in the amount of $2,788,281.63 and checks #18965 through
#19073 in the amount of $428,813.85. Motion seconded by Mayor Hamilton. The
following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson,
Councilman Geving. No negative votes. Motion carried.
FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT, NEAR MOUNTAIN: Dennis Mulvey, representing
Lundgren Brothers, was present seeking final development plan amendment approval
in order to construct 31 single familly homes on 7.8 acres located at the
Council Meeting June ` , 1983 -2-
southwest corner of Town Line Road and Chanhassen Road. The Planning
Commission recommended approval with the following conditions:
1. That the roadways be constructed to City standards.
2. That the model unit to be constructed not be occupied until provision
of full public improvements to the site have been initiated.
3. That proposed covenants and restrictions are subject to City Attorney
approval.
Mayor Hamilton moved to approve a final development plan amendment for Near
Mountain PRD, Planning Case 79-2 P.U.D., with the stipulations that the
roadways be constructed to City standards, that the model unit be
constructed and not be occupied until provision of full public improvements
to the site have been initiated, that proposed covenants and restrictions
are subject to City Attorney approval, and including the City Engineer's
memorandum of June 6, 1983. Motion seconded by Councilwoman Watson. The
following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson,
Councilman Geving. No negative votes. Motion carried.
REPLAT OF OUTLOTS H AND I, CHANHASSEN LAKES BUSINESS_ PARK: Opus
Corporation is proposing the replat Outlots H and I into three building
sites and three outlots.
Councilwoman Swenson moved to approve the replat of Lots H and I,
Chanhassen Lakes Business Park for Opus Corporation with the conditions
that:
1. The applicant dedicate all drainage and ponding easements as required
by the City Engineer.
2. That individual lots within the plat are not eligible for development
until such time as extension of full sewer, water, and street improveme S
have been initiated.
3. No change in the wetlands be permitted until such time as approved by
the City Council.
Motion seconded by Mayor Hamilton. The following voted in favor: Mayor
Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilman Geving. No negative
votes. Motion carried.
ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO ALLOW ADAPTIVE REUSE OF VACANT SCHOOL
BUILDINGS FOR NON -EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES: Mr. Wallace McKay, Minnetonka
School District, was present. Councilwoman Swenson moved to place on first
reading an ordinance amending Section 7.04 of Ordinance 47. Motion
seconded by Councilwoman Watson. The following voted in favor: Mayor
Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilman Geving. No negative
votes. Motion carried.
REAR YARD SETBACK VARIANCE, 6230 FIR
3 foot rear yard setback variance to
residence. The Board of Adjustments
the request.
TREE: Mr. Martin Beukhof is seeking a
construct a porch and deck onto his
and Appeals recommended approval of
Councilwoman Swenson moved to approve the 32 foot rear yard setback
variance request at 6230 Fir Tree as recommended by the Board of
Adjustments and Appeals. Motion seconded by Councilman Geving. The
following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson,
Councilman Geving. No negative votes. Motion carried.
LOT AREA VARIANCE, LOTS 3177-3182, CARVER BEACH: Mr. Paul Pokorny is
seeking a 3,000 square foot lot area variance to construct a home at 599
CITY OF �Qo
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
July 19, 1982
Mr. Sherman L. Goldberg
Division Manager of Land Development
Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc.
935 East Wayzata Blvd.
Wayzata, MN 55391
Dear Mr. Goldberg:
Enclosed is a revised development contract for Near Mountain
that addresses many of the points of your letter dated May 24
while consolidating and condensing others.
If you have additional comments, please let me know.
Sincerely,
William Monk
City Engineer
WM:bf
6-29-82
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
NEAR MOUNTAIN PROPERTIES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
, 1982, by and between NEAR MOUNTAIN
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I, a limited partnership of which PETER
PFLAUM and ROBERT L. MALAMED are General Partners,
(hereinafter the "Developer"), and the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a
Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City");
WITNESSETH, that the City, in the exercise of its powers
pursuant to MSA §462.358 and other applicable state laws, and
the Developer, in consideration of the mutual covenants
herein contained, recite and agree as follows:
SECTION 1. RECITALS.
1.01. Final Development Plan and Preliminary Plat
Approval. Developer has heretofore made application to the
City under the City Zoning Ordinance for the approval of a P -1,
Planned Residential Development District, for certain lands
comprising approximately 147 acres, more or less, identified as
Near Mountain, and more particularly described on Exhibit A
attached hereto and made a part hereof. The City Planning
Commission duly held a public hearing on October 17, 1979, on
the petition of the Developer for rezoning of the tracts of
land comprising the Plat from R-lA to P-1, Planned Residential
District, under the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance and for preli-
minary development plan and preliminary plat approval.
Thereafter, the City Council on May 11, 1981, granted final
development plan approval, including rezoning of the plat to P-
1, Planned Residential District and preliminary plat approval,
all said approvals being subject to the terms and conditions of
the within agreement and on the further condition that the
Developer and Owners enter into this agreement.
1.02. Ownership Interests. The fee owner of the
tract of land comprising the plat of Near Mountain is as
follows:
Near Mountain Limited Partnership I, a Limited part-
nership consisting of Peter Pflaum and Robert L. Melamed
as General Partners; and Edmund M. Lundgren, Gerald T.
Lundgren, Allan D. Lundgren, Michael A. Pflaum, Eugene
S. Holderness, David N. Olson, Harry J. Jensen, and
Samuel L. Kaplan, as Trustee under the Trust created by
J.S. Melamed, as Limited Partners.
6-29-82
1.03. Phasing Plan and Recording of Final Plats.
Consistent with the Final Development Plan approval, final plats
for Near Mountain shall be recorded in phases. Each phase
shall be consistent with the approved preliminary plat, more
particularly described on Exhibit B, or require submission of a
new application. The terms of this agreement shall be binding
for all phases platted prior to December 31, 1990. At such time,
the Chanhassen City Council, at its discretion, may further
extend this.agreement or require a new application for sub-
sequent phases.
SECTION 2.
IMPROVEMENT'S BY DEVELOPER.
2.01. Construction. Developer agrees at its expense to
construct, install, and perform all work and furnish all
materials and equipment in connection with the installation of
the following public improvements (hereinafter the "Public
Improvements"), in accordance with the Plans and Specifications
described in 12.02 below, as modified by the Special Conditions
set forth in Section 4 hereof:
a. Street grading, stabilizing, and bituminous surfacing
b. Surmountable concrete curbs and gutters
C. Sanitary sewer mains
d. Watermains
e. Storm and surface water drainage and holding ponds
f. Street signs
g. Boulevard sodding or seeding
h. Underground utility lines, and
i. Street lighting.
2.02. Final Plans and Specifications. The Developer
shall provide the City with final plans and specifications,
including a final grading plan, prepared by a registered pro-
fessional engineer, which plans and specifications shall be sub-
ject to the review and written approval of the City Engineer.
Said plans and specifications are hereby made a part of this
agreement. Developer shall not make or permit any changes,
variations, omissions or additions to City approved final plans
and specifications without the written approval of the City
Engineer prior to any such change, variation, omission or addition.
2.03. Standards of Construction. Developer agrees that
all of the public improvements shall be constructed and
installed in accordance with the aforesaid City approved plans
and specifications, and that said improvements shall equal or
exceed City standards, and that all of said work shall be sub-
ject to the inspection and approval of the City Engineer.
-2-
6-29-1982
2.04. Materials and Labor. All of the materials to be
employed in the making of said public improvements and all of the
work performed in connection therewith shall be of uniformly
good and workmanlike quality. In case any material or labor
supplied shall be rejected by the City as defective or
unsuitable, then such rejected material shall be removed and
replaced with approved material, and rejected labor shall be
done anew to the satisfaction and approval of the City at the
cost and expense of the Developer.
2.05. Staking, Surveying and Inspection. It is agreed
that the Developer, through his engineer, shall provide for all
staking, surveying and resident inspection for the above
described improvements in order to ensure that the completed
improvements conform to the approved plans and specifications.
The City will provide for general inspection and shall be
notified of all tests to be performed. It is agreed that the
estimated cost of such improvements, including charges of the
City for legal, planning, engineering services, including
inspection, supervision and administration costs, shall be
included in the total cost of all improvements for purposes of
computing the amount of the bond or financial security to be
furnished to the City by the Developer pursuant to the terms of
this agreement.
2.06. Completion Date and Schedule of Work.
a. It is agreed by the Developer that the construc-
tion of the public and private improvements within each final
plat of the phases of development contemplated by §1.03
hereof shall commence within one year of the filing of the
final plat at the Carver County Courthouse and that all
public improvements shall be completed within two years of
said plat filing.
b. It is agreed that the Developer shall submit a
written schedule indicating the progress schedule and order
of completion of the work covered by this agreement. It is
further agreed that upon receipt of written notice from the
Developer of the existence of causes over which the
Developer has no control which will delay the completion of
the work, the City Council, at its discretion, may extend
the date hereinbefore specified for completion and that any
bond or financial security required shall be continued by
the Developer to cover the work during this extension of
time.
C. Final approval and acceptance of the project
shall take the form of a Resolution duly passed by the City
Council, on the advice of the City Engineer.
2.07. Claims for Work. The Developer shall not do any
work or furnish any materials not covered by the plans and spec-
ifications and special conditions of this agreement, for which
reimbursement is expected from the City, unless such work is
first ordered in writing by the City Engineer as provided in the
specifications.
-3-
6-29-82
Any such work or materials which may be done or
furnished by the contractor, without such written order first
being given shall be at his own risk, cost and expense, and he
hereby agrees that without such written order he will make no
claim for compensation for work or materials so done or
furnished.
2.08. Final Inspection. Upon completion of all the
work required by the City Engineer, a representative of the
contractor, and a representative of the Developer's engineer will
make a final inspection of the work. Before final payment is
made to the contractor by the Developer, the City Engineer shall
be satisfied that all work is satisfactorily completed in accor-
dance with the approved plans and specifications; and the
Developer's engineer shall submit a written statement attesting
to same.
. 2.09. As Built Plans. Upon completion of the work, the
Developer shall have his engineer provide the City with a full
set of as -built mylar reproducible plans for City records.
These plans shall include the locations and ties to all sanitary
sewer and watermain services as well as gate valve boxes and
manholes.
2.10. City Disclaimer. It is agreed anything to the
contrary herein notwithstanding, that the City of Chanhassen,
the City Council and their agents, or employees, shall not be per-
sonally liable or responsible in any manner to the Developer,
Developer's contractor or subcontractor, material men, laborers
or to any other person or persons whomsoever, for any claim,
demand, damages, actions or causes of action of any kind or
character arising out of or by reason of the execution of this
agreement or the performance and completion of the work and the
improvements provided herein, and that the Developer shall save
the City harmless from all such claims, demands, damages,
actions or causes of actions or the costs disbursements, and
expenses of defending the same, specifically including, without
intending to limit the categories of said costs, cost and expenses
for City administrative time and labor, costs of consulting
engineering services and costs of legal services rendered in
connection with defending such claims as may be brought against
the City.
2.11. Erosion Control. Developer, at its expense,
shall provide temporary dams, earthwork or such other devices
and practices, including seeding of graded areas, as shall be
needed, in the judgment of the City Engineer, and the
Riley -Purgatory Creek Watershed District, to prevent the washing,
flooding, sedimentation and erosion of lands and roads within
and outside the plat during all phases of construction,
including construction on individual lots.
-4-
6-29-82
2.12. Street Lighting. The expense of furnishing
electrical energy for street lighting purposes shall be assumed
by the City twenty-four (24) months after completion of
installation of the street lighting system, or after fifty per-
cent (50%) of the building lots have been improved by the
construction of residences thereon, whichever is first to occur
2.13. Conveyance of Improvements. Upon completion of
the installation by Developer of the improvements, set forth in
12.01 hereof in accordance with the plans and specifications
hereunder and the written approval by the City, Developer shall
convey said improvements to the City free of all liens and
encumbrances and with warranty of title. Should the Developer
fail to so convey said improvements, the same shall become the
property of the City without further notice or action on the part
of either party hereto, other than acceptance by the City.
2.14. Building Permits and Occupancy Permits.
a. Prior to completion of the grading and placement
of rock stabilizing materials for road construction within
each plat, the City Building Inspector, with the approval
of the City Engineer, shall be authorized to issue building
permits for residential construction within such plat upon
payment of all fees and charges applicable to the issuance
of permits and provisions for adequate site access.
b. The occupancy of any structure within said plats
for residential purposes shall be prohibited by the City
until the rock stabilizing base of the streets shall -have
been completed and municipal sanitary sewer and water lines
shall have been installed and are available to serve the
lot for which a building permit shall have been issued.
2.15. One Year Guarantee of Work and Guarantee Bond.
All work and materials performed and furnished by the Developer,
its agents and subcontractors pursuant to 52.01 above, which are
found by the City to be defective within one year after accep-
tance by the City, shall be replaced by Developer at Developer's
sole expense. The within guarantee of work shall be secured to
the City by an irrevocable letter of credit, or a corporate surety
bond, at the election of and in an amount established by the City,
furnished by the developer to the City. Said letter of credit or
surety bond shall first be approved by the City Attorney, and
shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other remedies
which may be available to the City to secure any defects in
materials and workmanship.
2.16. Liability Insurance. Developer shall take out
and maintain so long as Developer's obligations continue under
this agreement, public liability and property damage insurance
covering personal injury, including death, and claims for prop-
erty damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work
of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed
by any of them. Limits for bodily injury or death shall be not
-5-
6-29-82
less than $ for one person and $
$ for each accident; limits for prop-
erty damage shall be not less than $ for each
accident. The City shall be named as an additional named insured
on said policy, and Developer shall file a copy of the insurance
coverage with the City.
2.17. Remedies Upon Default.
a. Assessments. In the event Developer shall
default in the performance of any of the covenants and
agreements herein contained, and such default shall not
have been cured within ten (10) days after receipt by
Developer of written notice thereof, the City, if it so
elects, may cause any of the required improvements to be
constructed and installed, or may take action to cure said
default, and may cause the entire cost thereof, including
all reasonable engineering, legal and administrative
expense incurred by the City, to be recovered as a special
assessment under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, in which
case the Developer agrees to pay the entire amount of the
assessment roll pertaining to any such improvement within
sixty (60) days after its adoption. In addition, Developer
further agrees that in the event of its failure to pay in
full any such special assessment within the time prescribed
herein, the City shall have a specific lien on all of
Developer's real property within said plat for any amount
so unpaid, and the City shall have the right to foreclose
said lien in the manner prescribed for the foreclosure of
mechanic's liens under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
b. Legal Proceedings. In addition to the foregoing,
the City may institute any proper action or proceeding at
law or at equity to compel specific performance, to prevent
violations, or to restrain or abate violations of this
development contract.
SECTION 3. Reserved.
W-M
6-29 -82
SECTION 4. SPECIAL CONDITIONS.
4.01. Trail System.
a. The Developer shall donate to the City a per-
petual fifteen (15) foot wide easement for a pedestrian
trail system which shall substantially conform to the
Preliminary Development Plan previously submitted to the
Planning Commission on August 29, 1979 and identified as
"Site Plan" prepared by Herb Baldwin, Landscape Architect,
showing the trail alignment and a proposed scenic overlook.
The trail system shall be separate from the street bitumi-
nous surface and may be activated by the City at any time,
regardless of whether the phase of the project over which
the trail system extends has been finally platted or devel-
oped. The obligation to furnish and install the surfacing
and to maintain the system shall be solely that of the City
b. Outlot b and F shall be dedicated to the City as
part of the pedestrian trail system.
4.02. Covenants and Restrictions. Any proposed cove-
nants or restrictions to be placed upon the lots in the subject
plat shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to recording
with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles. The zoning
ordinances and regulations of the City shall govern if incon-
sistent with said covenants and restrictions to the extent
actually inconsistent; but if not inconsistent therewith, the
standards contained in said covenants and restrictions shall be
considered as requirements in addition to said City ordinances
and regulations.
4.03. Setting of Lot and Block Monuments. Developer
shall place iron monuments at all lot and block
all other angle points on boundary lines. Iron
be placed after construction of improvements has
in order to preserve the lot markers for future
4.04. Street.
corners and at
monuments shall
been completed
property owners.
a. The North -South and East-West collector streets
within the development plan shall have a right-of-way of 60
feet and a road surface of 36 feet. All other residential
streets shall have a right-of-way of 50 feet and a road
surface of 28 feet. All cul-de-sacs shall have a platted
radius of 60 feet and a paved surface with a 40 foot
radius.
b. All streets within the plat shall be constructed
with concrete curbs and gutters.
4.05. Street Maintenance During Construction. The
Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until
streets are accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed
-7-
6-29-82
when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from tra-
veling on same and directing attention to detours. If and when
streets become impassable, such streets shall be barricaded and
closed. In the event residences are occupied prior to
completing streets, the Developer shall maintain a smooth sur-
face and provide proper surface drainage. The Developer shall
be responsible for keeping streets within and without the sub-
division swept clean of dirt and debris that may spill or wash
onto the street from his operation. The Developer may request,
in writing, that the City keep the streets open during the
winter months by plowing snow from said streets prior to final
acceptance of said streets. The City shall not be responsible
for re -shaping said streets because of snow plowing operations
if they are requested and providing snow plowing service does
not constitute final acceptance of said streets.
4.06. Street Sians. All street name and traffic signs
required within the subdivision at the time of City acceptance
shall be furnished and installed by the City at the sole cost of
the Developer.
4.07. Park Fees. Prior to the issuance of building
permits for residential construction within the plat, Developer,
it succesors or assigns, shall pay to the City the park fee then
in force pursuant to Chanhassen Ordinance 14-A and relevant City
Council Resolutions thereafter.
4.08. Undertaking in Lieu of Bond. The Developer has
submitted a proposed "undertaking in lieu of bond" (also known
as a construction loan agreement) rather than a performance bond
or security deposit to secure performance of its obligations
under the within contract. Said "undertaking" is hereby given
concept approval only subject to the following conditions:
a. All documentation evidencing the "undertaking in
lieu of bond" shall be approved by the City Attorney prior
to the commencement of work on the project.
b. The City Engineer shall do all inspection of the
work.
C. No disbursement of funds shall be made by the
escrow agent under said "undertaking" to contractors on pay
requests until the City Engineer certifies that the work has
been done in accordance with City standards and the plans
and specifications. See Exhibit C attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
4.09. Landscape and Trees and Location of Structures.
a. Landscaping and location of structures shall take
into consideration the preservation of trees, slope protec-
tion, subsurface drainage, prevention of siltation and
similar potential problems.
I "'
• 6-29-82
b. Trees to be provided. Developer shall provide
each single family detached dwelling with one boulevard
canopy tree with a diameter of not less than 11 inches. In
the case of corner lots, one such tree shall be furnished
for each street frontage.
4.10. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances and Regulations;
Permits. In the development of the plat, Developer shall comply
with all laws, ordinances and regulations of, and secure all
necessary permits from, the following authorities:
1. City of Chanhassen
2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments
and commissions
3. Department of Natural Resources
4. Riley -Purgatory Creek Watershed District
5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
4.11. Public Improvement Special Assessments.
Outstanding public improvements special assessments (including
interest) as originally levied shall be split and assigned to
the benefitting lots within the final plat so as not to impair
the existing repayment schedule.
SECTION 5. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.
5.01. Easements to be Shown on Plat. Easements for
drainage, storm water holding ponds, open space, pedestrian
walkways, trails, City access to storm ;cater holding ponds for
maintenance purposes, and utility easements shall be shown on
all final plats to the extent allowable under applicable state
law. Non -qualifying easements shall be deeded to the City as
outlots or by legal description.
5.02. Proof of Title. Upon request, Developer shall
furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it
is fee owner of the subject property.
5.03. Duration of Contract: This contract shall remain
in effect until such time as Developer shall have fully per-
formed all of its duties and obligations under this contract.
Upon the written request of Developer and upon the adoption of a
resolution by the Chanhassen City Council finding that the
Developer has fully complied with all of the terms of this
contract and finding that Developer has completed performance of
all Developer's duties mandated by this contract, the Chanhassen
City Manager shall issue to the Developer on behalf of the City
an appropriate certificate of compliance for each completed and
accepted phase of the proposed development.
:WOM
6-29-82
5.04. Notices. All notices, certificates and other
communications hereunder shall be sufficiently given and shall
be deemed given when mailed by certified mail, return receipt
requested, postage prepaid, with property address as indicated
below. The City and the Developer, by written notice given by
one to the other, may designate any address or addresses to
which notices, certificates or other communications to them shall
be sent when required as contemplated by this agreement. Unless
otherwise provided by the respective parties, all notices, cer-
tificates and communications to each of them shall be addressed
as follows:
To the City: City of Chanhassen
690 Coulter Drive
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Attn: City Manager
To the Developer:
5.05. Binding Effect. This agreement shall inure to
the benefit of and shall be binding upon the City and the
Developer and their respective successors and assigns. Nothing
in this agreement, express or implied, shall give to any person,
other than the parties hereto, and their respective successors,
and assigns, hereunder, any benefit or other legal or equitable
right, remedy or claim under this agreement.
5.06. Severability. In the event any provisions of
this agreement shall be held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable
by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not
invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision hereof,
and the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or
impaired thereby.
5.07. Execution of Counterparts. This agreement may be
simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which
shall be an original, and all of which shall constitute but one
and the same instrument.
5.08. Construction. This agreement shall be construed
in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota.
5.09. Headings. Headings at the beginning of sections
and paragraphs hereof are for convenience of reference, and
shall not be considered a part of the text of this contract,
and shall not influence its construction.
-10-
6-29-82
5.10. Sign Plan: Signs for the purpose of advertising
the subject property may be erected in accordance with the
Developer's sign plan only after submission to and approval by
the City Council.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these
presents to be executed on the day and year first above written.
NEAR MOUNTAIN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I
By
General Partner
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
By
Mayor
By
City Manager
Attachments:
Exhibit A: Preliminary Development Plan
Exhibit B: Preliminary Plat
Exhibit C: Construction Loan Agreement
-11-
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss
COUNTY OF CARVER
6-29-82
On this day of _, 19 _,
before me, a notary public within and for said County, per-
sonally appeared _ and
to me personally known, who,
being each by me duly sworn did say that they are respectively
the and
of the limited partnership named in the foregoing instrument,
and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said
limited partnership by authority of its
and said
acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said
limited partnership.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss
COUNTY OF CARVER
Notary Public
On this day of , 19 , before
me, a notary public within and for said County, personally
appeared Thomas L. Hamilton and Donald W. Ashworth, to me per-
sonally known, who being each by me duly sworn did say that they
are respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the municipal
corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal
affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said munici-
pal corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed
in behalf of said municipal corporation by authority of its City
Council and said Thomas L. Hamilton and Donald W. Ashworth
acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said
municipal corporation.
Notary Public
aWAZ
CITY OF CHANHASSE,1
VER AND HENNEPIN COUNTITS, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC EARIN_G FOR FINAL DE ELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT,
THE NEAR MOUNTAIN D,_-LUNDGREN BROT ERS, INC., CHANHASSEN,
MINNESOTA.
NOTICE IS HEREBY VEN, that e Planning Commission of the
City of Chanhassen, Min esotaysine
w' 1 meet on Wednesday the 8th day
of June, 1983, at 7:30 p4..e City Hall, 690 Coulter Drive
for the purpose of holdinic hearing to consider a final
development plan amendmennge the designated land use for
a portion of the Near Mouoject from 36 units of fourplex
to 31 small lot detached amily residential units. The
area for which thisplan t is proposed contains approxi-
mately 7.8 acres lying inthwest corner of the intersec-
tion of Townline Road andwy. 101 (see attached map).
A plan showing said propo ed final development plan amendment is
available for inspection t City �11. All persons interested
may appear and be heard t said t e and place.
By Ord4 of the Planning Commission
Bob Waibe , City /Planner
(Publish in the Carver County Her ld May 25, 1983.)
REGULAR CHANHASSEN ! Y COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 22, 1983
Mayor Hamilton called the meeting to order. The meeting was opened with
the Pledoe to the Flag.
Members Present
Councilwoman Watson, Councilman Geving, and Councilman Horn.
Member Absent
Councilwoman Swenson
Staff Present
Bill Monk, Don Ashworth, and Bob Waibel.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor Hamilton moved to approve the agenda as pre-
sented. Motion seconded by Councilman Geving. The following voted in
favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwoman Watson, Councilmen Gevino and Horn.
No negative votes. Motion carried.
CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman Horn moved to approve the consent agenda pur-
suant to the City Manager's recommendation.
1 . Final Plat Approval, Nea- '�'oun-a-n Setiond A d d i ti :; ..
Motion seconded by Councilman. Geving. The following voted in favor: Mayo
Hamilton, Councilwoman Watson, Councilmen Gevina and Horn. No negative
votes. Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
Mayor Hamilton called the hearina to order. There being no one present,
Councilman Gevina moved to close the public hearing. Motion seconded by
Councilman Horn. The followina voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton,
Councilwoman Watson, Councilmen Gevina and Horn. No negative votes.
Motion carried.
AMENDMENT TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM:
Councilwoman Watson - I have never seen—fTFe results of the survey.
Don Ashworth - I can make sure that the Council receives a copy of those.
I thought that they had been distributed previously. The results were ver,
limited as far as the results that we received back. They were not posi-
tive and I Guess that's basically what they are saying in here.
Councilman Geving - I am very disappointed in the proposal to reprogram
$105,000 that this Council had worked so hard over the last three or four
years to acquire to build a senior citizens housing community in
Chanhassen. We worked very hard to acquire those funds. We pigeon -holed
them. We saved them and then we did a survey which as far as I am con-
cerned we didn't do a very good job on. I never saw the survey results an(
until this June lst, a letter that appears tonight in our Council packet,
we were advised back in June that there was some problem with the elderly
housing survey and that we would have to be forced to reprogram that money
or lose it and as a result of that I became very excited because I had pro-
mised over the last three or four years senior citizens housina for this
community. I was trying to save the kind of monies that we would need to
Council Meetina Auaus :2, 1983 -2-
do that and now I see that the HRA and others are proposing to reprogram .
this money, not to build Chanhassen but to tear down Chanhassen. The money
is going to be proposed to be used to, in one case, clear a site preparatio
of the Old Instant Web Building. That's not constructive as far as I am
concerned. I don't appreciate getting this kind of a memorandum from the
City Staff on the 21st of August and we have to make a decision by
September lst, when we had this memorandum over two months ago. The
results of the survey would have been very beneficial to us had it been
brought to our attention on June lst. I just feel very badly about this
whole thing and it's going to be very difficult for me to go to senior
citizen's on Thursday afternoon, which I do attend quite regularly, and
tell them that we cannot have a senior citizens housing available for them
in this City because we have reprogramed their money for other purposes.
Ouite frankly, I don't think this survey was done properly. If you will
look at what Chaska and other communities that have built facilities such
as this have done, they have gone to the churches, gotten their support,
made their surveys known. Those are the people that you have got to aet
to. You can't just put a survey in the City Newsletter and expect to get
results. I could have predicted a very negative result. Until I see the
results of the survey and the reasons why the negative responses came in
I can't ao along with the HRA proposal. That's another thing, why was this
presented to the HRA before it was presented to the City Council? This is
the first I have heard of this. I am very much negative. I am very much
not in favor of reprograming these $105,472 for the purpose of tearing down
Chanhassen. I want to build something in Chanhassen. At the same time I
would like to have the Community Development staff member advise the
planning core area citizens advisory committee that we have tabled this and
cannot respond to their September 1st date until we have a chance to meet
and discuss it further.
Councilman Gevinq moved to table action. Motion seconded by Councilwoman
Watson. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwoman
Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried.
MINUTES: Councilwoman Watson moved to approve the July 20, 1983, Council
minutes. Motion seconded by Councilman Gevina. The following voted in
favor: Councilwoman Watson and Councilman Geving. Mayor Hamilton and
Councilman Horn abstained. Motion carried.
Councilma.n Horn moved to approve the July 21, 1983, HRA minutes. Motion
seconded by Councilwoman Watson. The following voted in favor: Mayor
Hamilton, Councilwoman Watson, Councilmen Gevina and Horn. No negative
votes. Motion carried.
Councilman Geving moved to note the July 27, 1983, Planning Commission
minutes. Motion seconded by Councilwoman Watson. The following voted in
favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwoman Watson, Councilmen Gevinq and Horn.
No neoative votes. Motion carried.
CARVER BEACH BOAT ACCESS, REVIEW BOAT MOORING, STORAGE AND DOCK POLICIES:
Mayor Hamilton- I think as most of the audience knows and as Council mem-
Ters are aware, Don Ashworth and myself have met with the Carver Beach
people on two separate occasions in an attempt to resolve this issue. What
I.was trying to do was to come up with some type of a verbal agreement that
the Carver Beach people could be happy with and that the City could be -
happy with and that I could support to the Council so that we could do away
with this process and move a little more quickly. Unfortunately we have