78-06 - Sinnen REZ pt 1r
9-10-80 Planning Commission Minutes _2
Mr. Partridge moved to note the August 12, 1980, City
Council Minutes. Mr. M. Thompson seconded the motion. All. voted.
aye. Motion carried.
Mr. W. Thompson moved to note the August 25,-198 O,
City Council Minutes. Mr. Partridge seconded the moti.orx._ Al).
voted aye. Motion carried.
,_,,Pk(7POSED- REZONING, SINNEN PROPERTY, -PUBLIC: HEARING:
Mr. Waibel explained that upon tb&i Planni.nr C:am ri.ssic,r�.'s:
recommendation, the City Council has authorized the Planning
Commission to hold that public hearing under the provisions of
Section 14.07, subsection 2, of Ordinai)ce No- 47, -which permits
the City to initiate rezoning to the original zoning district on
parcels that have had no development occur within a reasonable period
of time after urbanized zoning was granted..
Mr. Waibel further explained that t:hera was a. proposal
by McKeon Construction to develop the subject property with ap-
proximately 502 dwelling units of various types in 1973. He stated.
this property was located directly west of Chanhassen Estates down
to the -northwest shores of Rice Marsh Lake.
.. Mr. Waibel compared this request to that regarding the Oak-
mont Property, which was discussed approximately --one month ago,
and recommended that, because of the inactivity -on the property
and in light of the evolution of the planning practices since 1973,
approval should be recommended by the Planning Commission to the
City Council to rezone the subject property from Planned Develop-
ment District to R-IA, Agricultural Residential District.
In response to Ms. Marie Weber, 8034 Erie Avenue, Mr. Partrier
said the zoning would remain until the property owners requested a
change of zoning if it was rezoned back to 11_71A. -
Mr. Jerome Raidt, attorney for Martin Ward the abutting
property owner, asked if the previous planned development proposal
was dead at this time. Mr. Waibel said the first proposal was in
1973 and the last proposal was 1 1/2 years ago and that due. to its:
dormancy, it would be best to rezone it back to basically a reserve
status of R-IA. He further said the- plan of 1973 was probably not
within the thinking of Chanhassen's current planning standards and
desires for that area. He responded to Mr. Raidt's question of
property use by saying the comprehensive plan the City is current]),
working on shows the property to be of low -density single family
with a portion to contain a multiple residential area. Chairman
Horn indicatedthepast proposal for the subject property was for
approximately 6 units per acre and the last projects of other sites
reviewed by the Planning Commission have not exceeded approximately
2.9 dwelling units per acre. Thus, the last proposal for this site
is twice as dense as any of the recent developments allowed by the
city.
f �v
9-16-80 Planning Commission Minutes
Chairman Horn explained that the purpose pftrevi ewing
this is basically to start the process over again if someone
comes in with another planned unit development;. otherwise, the
last proposal is already approved and could be easily carried out..
Air. W. Johnson stated it was within the R-1 zoning ordinance that
the property should be reviewed on a periodic basis.
In response to Air. W. Thompson, Mr. Waibel said Rumars Inc.,
had brought in the last proposal 1 1/2 years ago for the subject
property. They had come close to obtaining 'preliminary plat -
review of the property.
In response to Mr. M. Thompson, Mr. Waibel, indicated s -
August Sinnen was the recorded owner of the property but it was appar
an estate situation. The property owners according to. the -
County's tax records .were the individuals who received notice of
this hearing. He said the Rumar, Inc., individuals were not
notified of the hearing because they were not recorded. as any party
to this land.
In response to Mr. W. Thompson, Mr. Mertz said it was`
within the Planning Commission's jurisdiction to rezone the -subject:
property back to R-lA if there was no pending application for the
property.
Mr. M. Thompson expressed concern over the interest: of Rumar, s.
three [3) parties who had purchased the property through a Contract -
for -Deed. Discussion followed pertaining t-o the --question of
whether or not the Planning Commission should table the request
until notice had been given to those parties having a Contract -for -
Deed on the property.
Chairman Horn asked if all that was- needed to develop the
property was to bring in a final proposal.. Air: Mertz responded
that that was true and, therefore, was a di:sad.vantage from a
planner's standpoint. Chairman Horn felt there was a reasonable --
period of time for the development process to retain any sense of
continuity.
Air. B. Johnson moved to close the public hearing.. Mr.
M. Thompson seconded the motion. All voted aye. Moti carried.
Mr. W. Thompson felt the matter should be tabled to allow
staff the opportunity to notify the other parties with an interest
in the property. _-
Air. Mertz felt the party that made the last application and
the three (3) other parties with an interest in the property should
be notified.
Following further discussion of whether the item .should be,
tabled, Mr. Partridge moved to recommend approval of the rezoning
9-10-°80 Planning Lommission Minutes --4--
request from Planned Development District to R-IA, Agricultural.
Residential District, to the City Council because there has been
no activity for 1 1/2 years; furthermore, he moved, that. uOien
the City Council takes the matter under consideration, they should_
be advised that there are other parties that: were not notified
that may have -an interest in the subject property due to a. possible-
Contract -for -Deed situation. Mr. W. Johnson seconded— the mot—
ion -All voted aye with the exception of Mr. M. Thompson, who abstained -
Motion carried. _
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 45 AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE 33,
PUBLIC HEARING:
Air. Mertz explained that this was a- public: h.earzng to consider
an amendment to Ordinance No. .33 and 'Ordinance No.. 45- He indi-
cated there was some question as to the wording of the public
hearing notice which stated that the purpose of the hearing was
to consider a prohibition on the issuance of building permits and
subdivision of land in the unsewered area. of: the- ci_t_y. He said
it was their philosophy the notices should be broad in scope so
that they would encompass any possible outcome that the staff anti-
cipates would result from the Planning Commission meeting rather
than be faced with the possibility that the Commission had gene
one step beyond what was described in the public }fearing notice and
being forced, therefore, to re -publish the item and re -}year it.
Mr. Mertz said the- two ordinances in-queston do, in, fact,
prohibit the subdivision of unsewered lands within the cs.ty of Chan-
hassen. The specific changes that 'were being requested were
basically of a housekeeping nature. He said the first. item Yelat_es.
to the wording of Ordinance 33B and proceeded to read what was in-
cluded within the ordinance.. He said the exceptions relating to
filing and recording of deeds is merely a paraphrase of a. portion
of the State Planning Act' as it existed be -fore. the-1980 Session
of the State ,Legislature. Since ' the 1980 Legislative Session-, _ -
however, the' fourth exception was changed in the State Planning
Act, due to lobbying of municipalities, to read _ was a
separate parcel of not less than five acres in area and 300 feet
in width on July 1, 1980 ." Thus, st-aff's first housekeeping
request is that Ordinance No. 33B be amended in. subdivision 4,
which relates to 300 foot wide 5 acre parcels, to include the r`
July 1, 1980, expiration date. He said staff was also requesting
exceptions S and 6 from the State Planning -Act: of subdivision 4b
be added to Chanhassen's Ordinance No. 33B. This was also a house-
keeping request as the State has mandated. the above requests be
accepted by the municipalities.
Air. Mertz stated what was included in Section. 2 of Ordinance
No. 45. He said it was interpretted to mean that if y oux parcel
L
RUSSELL H. LARSON
CRAIG M. MERTZ
OF COUNSEL
HARVEY E. SKAAR
MARK C. McCULLOUGH
Chanhassen
c/o Donald
BOX 147
Chanhassen
LARSON & MERTZ
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1900 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST
MIIVNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
January 29, 1981
City Council
W. Ashworth, City Manager
MN 55317
6
TELEPHONE
(612) 335-9565
tN JAN 1981
C RECEIVED 03
N VILLAGE OF
CO CHANHASSEN, c ,
Re: Rezoning of Sinnen & Oakmont Properties
from P-2 to RlA
Dear Council Members:
On December 22, 1980, the Council deferred action on the matter
of the down zoning of the Oakmont and Sinnen properties from P-2
to R1A pending receipt from this office of the following opinion
on the question of whether the Council has authority to down zone.
In considering this question, we have reviewed the Oakmont file,
including the correspondence received from Attorney David C.
Sellergren who represents the Oakmont interests. Most of Mr.
Sellergren's points are directed to planning and platting aspects
of the Oakmont proposed development and are, therefore, matters
solely for consideration by the Planning Commission and the Council.
Hence, these aspects are not dealt with in this report.
On the legal question of whether the Council has authority to
down zone these properties, we conclude that it has this authority.
The Oakmont and Sinnen zoning status fall within the general rule
of law which holds that there is no vested right in zoning.
Property Research and Development Company vs. City of Eagan,
Minn. 289 NW2d , 157 (1980); Almquist v. Town of Marshall 308
Minn. 52, 245 NW2d 819 (1976); Vachon & Son, Inc. v. City of Concord,
112 NH 107, 289 A 2d 646 (1972), 50 ALR 3d 596, 607 (1973 .
An owner may acquire a vested right in a specific zoning category
for his property under the following circumstances:
a) The grant of a building permit coupled with
the commencement of significant construction,or
b) The expenditure of significant sums of money to
develop the property.
Neither of the foregoing "vested right circumstances" are applicable
to the Sinnen and Oakmont properties.
Chanhassen City Council
January 29, 1981
Page Two
The fact that the Oakmont P-2 zoning is based on a contract does
not abrogate the application to that property of the general rule
cited above,as there are no "vested right circumstances" shown to
exist with reference to P-2 zoning.
,-Verr t)uly. ur
RUSSELL H. LARSON
Chanhassen City Attorney
RHL:ner
cc: David C. Sellergre4,Esq.
l CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7610 LAREDO DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
u10W.e G : N FW39
DATE: December 22, 1980
TO: City Manager, Don Ashworth
FROM: Land Use Coordinator, Bob Waibel
SUBJ: Sinnen Property Down -zoning
PLANNING CASE: P-597
We have received a phone call this afternoon from representatives of RUMAR,
Inc., indicating that they will not be able to have anyone in attendance
for consideration of the subject item by the City Council this evening.
For this reason, they have requested that this item be tabled to a future
meeting and that Mr. Larry Marofski (566-4411) be notified of when this
meeting might be. The records show RUMAR, Inc., as being the most recent
party submitting an application for development on the subject property;
however, our review of the tax list shows no ownership interest on behalf
of RUMAR, Inc.
BW:nr /
A
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7610 LAREDO DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
DATE: December 18, 1980
TO: City Manager, Don Ashworth
FROM: Land Use Coordinator, Bob Waibel
SUBJ: Down -zoning from P-2, Planned Unit Development District, to
R-lA, Agricultural Residential District, August Sinnen Property.
APPLICANT: City of Chanhassen
PLANNING CASE: P-597
Pursuant to Section 14.07 of Ordinance No. 47, the Planning Commission
has duly held a public hearing for the down -zoning of the subject property
since no development activity has occurred over the years. The
subject propety has had PUD proposals of 658 apartment, townhouse,
and single family units by Prestige Corporation in 1971, a 549
apartment, patio hone, single family units by McKeon Construction
Inc. in 1973, and a 232 apartment, condominium, townhouse, single
family, and 7 duplex unit proposal by Rumar Inc. in 1978.
Although not recorded as owners of record, this office has notified
Rumar Development Inc. of the proposed action. 'Their response,
requesting that the present zoning remain intact, can be found
in the attached letter from Craig Thielke dated October 8, 1980.
In concurrence with the Planning Commission, I recommend that the
City Council down -zone the subject property to R-lA, Agricultural
Residential District.
po-�O V. � F&
'Ivelo
'. g_m' - " X
r
,
7of-X,a
06S
�reS ewrfe.a� iAJ
/'el�on�.f es iN4%. CJ!
ara fAQ lam.
i✓ 6 pc f a' fit..» -� � a l�a, a ..,��.
Minutes of the 12-17-80 Planning Commission Meeting
t' Page 6
(11) _Oakmarit: Mr. Waibel said the subject district was scheduled
to be heard, by the City Council. on December 22, 1980, for a dawn -zoning.
The Planning Commissim had previously reeom ended the City Council
down -zone the property. No further comTents were made.
(12) Near..Nbuntainc Mr. Waibel said this was a residential proposal;
and proceeded to describe it. In response to Mr. M. Thompson, Mr. Waibel
said the Near Mountain proposal had received preliminary development. plan
approval from the Planning Commission and the City. Council in the last.
year. The Ccgrmission generally agreed with staffs recommendation that
the project be maintained on an annual review list.
(13) Sunnyslope Addition: Mr. Waibel.described the addition
and noted the City Council had. set a completion deadline of July 1, 1981,
for the public improvements. He recommended this district be maintained
on an annual review list until 70 to 80 percent of the building sites were
absorbed and that the completion deadline for the public improvements be
upheld. Discussion occurred on the Addition's road width. The Commission
agreed with staffs recarmendation but felt the district should. remain.
on the annual review list until -fully completed. '
(14.) Sunrise -Beach_-P R.D,: Mr. Waibel described the district
and noted the status saying it had received final development plan approval
from the .City Council but there were various administrative items yet to
be reviewed. He recommended the district be maintained on an annual review
list until 70 to 80 percent of the building sites were absorbed. Mr.. M.
Thompson noted there was an excessive number of trees being removed from
the site for development purposes. The Cormdssion_generally agreed..with
staff's"recorimendation but stated the district should remain on the annual
review list until 100 percent of the building sites were absorbed.
(15) Sinnen Property ( Hidden Valley Estates-): Mr. Waibel described
the district proposal and noted the Planning Ccgmrission recdation
of down -zoning due to absence of development taking place was awaiting
City Council review. The Commission maintained that recommendation.
.s
(16) Saratoga Addition:) Mr. Waibel described the. addition and
its status. He recommended the single family and duplex portions of the
plan be removed from annual review because of their percentage of completion
and that the apartment portions of the plan be maintained on an annual
review basis. The Commission generally agreed. with staffs recommendation.
(17) Waldrip-Addition--* Mr. Waibel explained the proposed develop-
ment and made the recommendation that should the present plans receive
preliminary development plan approval, a development deadline such as two
or three years should be placed on the subject property so that down -zoning
can be considered if this deadline, is exceeded. Should the present plans
receive denial, down -zoning of the property to R-1., Single Family Residential
District, should occur. The Comma ssion generally agreed with staff's recommenda-
tion.
�z LAW OFFICE OF
CRAIG W. THIELKE
i
6803 Washington Avenue South
Edina, Minnesota 55435
(612) 941-7111
October S, 1980
Bob Waibel
Land Use Coordinator
City of Chanhassen
7610 Laredo Drive
P. 0. Box 147
Chanhassen, MDT 55317
Dear Mr. Waibel:
As I discussed with you on the telephone October 7, my client Rumar Inc.,
the most recent zoning applicant on record for a parcel of land sometimes re-
ferred to as the Sinnen property, opposes any immediate change of zoning.
Please be advised that there is a strong possibility that this land will be
sold in the near future, and such sale contemplates urbanization of this land.
As I understand the city's position, urbanization of this property is not
opposed, but in fact is anticipated. Your concern with the nature of such de-
velopment is appreciated as is your concern for progress in one direction or
another.
However, in the interest of seeing the development of this land move ahead
with a minimum of delay, it is our view that it is in everyone's interest to
allow the present zoning to remain as it now is, at least long enough to give
such new purchaser the opportunity to make his intentions known to the city.
I will be glad to attend the meeting of the city council at such time as they
deem it necessary to reach a decision on this, but I am hopeful that this can be
held off for a short time to allow things to work themselves out.
Your comments and suggestions on this matter are most welcome.
Very truly )yours.,
Crai Thielke
CWT/cas
CC: Jim Grobe
r
7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O. BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
September 18, 1980
CERTIFIED MAIL
Mr. Rueben Andrig
c/o Rumar. Inc.
6975 Washington Avenue South
Edina, Minnesota 55435
Dear Mr. Andrig:
This letter is to inform you that the Planning Commission held
a public hearing at its meeting of September 105, 19-80, to con-
sider the reversion of the zoning of the Sinnen property to
R-lA, Agricultural Residential District. As you probably know,
for such public hearings, notification of public hearing is
sent to property owners of record:"on the Carver County tax
list for fulfillment of the statutory requirement. As such,
you or your firm was not included in the notification. The
Planning Commission did take action :to recommend that the City
Council rezone the subject -Property to Agricultural Residential
District; however, they also directed staff to notify the
most recent applicant of record on the parcel to solicit any
comments they might have for the record on the rezoning.
This action is being taken essentially in recognition that no
development has taken place on the property since the property
was zoned to P-2 approximately ten years ago and also in
recognition that the planning practicies of Chanhassen have
evolved considerably since that time. Although this action is
to rezone the property to an agricultural category,,the Comprehen-
sive Plan update does anticipate this property to' 'urbanize with
residential land uses.
This item is expected to go to
for their consideration, and I
have some questions regarding
contact me with any questions
convenience. -
Sincerely,
Bob Waibel
Land Use Coordinator
BW:nr
the City Council sometime in October
am sure that you will probably
the matter. Please feel free to
or comments at your earliest possible
cc: File
Don Ashworth
Russ Larson
Planning Commissions
Presentation. Section
CITY -OF
7610 LAREDO DRIVE*P.O. BOX 147•CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
PLANNING REPORT
DATE: September 8, 1980
TO: Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Bob Waibel, Land Use Coordinator
SUBJ: Zoning Reversion, Sinnen Property, Publi*c Hearing
APPLICANT: City of Chanhassen
PLANNING CASE: P-597
.: 3,.k
d Ma
Upon Planning Commission recommendation, the City Council has
authorized the Piannfng Commission hold this public hearing under
the provisions of Section 14.07, subsection 2 of Ordinance No. 47,
which permits the City to initiate rezoning to the original
zoning district on parcels that have had no development occur
within a reasonable period of time after urbanized zoning was
granted."
-In 1973, there was a proposal on the subject property by McKeon
Construction to develop the subject 83.7 acres with approximately
502 dwelling units of,7'various types. Since that initial review
of development, there has been no construction taking place on
the subject property
Like the P1 annJ'ng-Comm"iss-Jon. consideration of . a., s.imij.ar-action on
the Oakmont property approximately one month ago, in light of the
evolution of the planning _practices for Chanhassen -since 1973,
h would recommend that the Planning Commission' recommend that
the City Council rezone the subject property to R-1A, Agricultural
Residential District.
BW:nr
a61 �. saJidxH uo!-I—oa AW
uulWAluno00 3119nd faeloN
9S4t 'VZ 'Po goildxg uoltsluiuroy AVj `
AINnoo a3AUVO }
VIOS3NNIVI - miafld AUVl
N30I0N V VIH1NAD
I ( {
»_e'v
---
to Sep �sigl — aao;aq of uaoms pue paglaasgnS
m..,oum1K[ly9;apage
:lim ol'aallou ples;o uolleailgnd
pue uollisodmoa aql u[ pasn ad,fl;o pull pue azls aql Sulaq se po2palmouilae AgaJay sr pue `aAlsnlau[ gloq 'Z of V uIOJ;
lagegdie asea Jamol ayl;o 6do3 palwd a s1 Sulmollo; ayl leyl puW61,} S,n n ;oLJ!g�— ayl SuTn[am
pue of ±UPSaH jr1 AJaAa uo paysf1Qnd pue polulJd Jal;eaaayl sem pue 0�331 +G1L Z'V ;o Sep
zayl �ai� uo paysllgnd os lsal; sem 11 legl :ssiaam anismms __V— Jo; `31aam yaea aauo
`afienSuel gsgSug ail ul ula'Jayl pagsllgnd pue palwd sum pue `Jadedsmau pies ;o suumlo3 ay1 nmJ; Ina sum ;oalay
lied a se pagoelle olaaaq
— l paluud agl IBM glen uo salels Jagl.m; aH
66��# T�Fo`I
(0961`LZ PmftV PPJeH fflunoa Jamga •qnd)
�O "Wma agn Pori 11ag1sds qog
-Jadedsmou [ePal a q Jadedsmau aql legP StuPE4s ailgnd ,SJelou n aao;aq of uJoms pue Jadedsmau ples 3O Jaal;]o Su18euew
HOISSIM0J ONINNV'Id HH,L 90 NH(IIHO A9
ayl hq Pads Pug alels ;o Am" ago Aq pagll-aid uuo; alp ul iTAepl;;e ue "geaaa n 16Jenuef g3ua pug 9961
l 6Jenuep of Jo1Jd elosawryy;o alelS;o �SaelaiaaS aql' PW PaP.3 seq Jadedsmau pieg (g) •molaq p uoggz)q nd;o
HI)V'Id QNV HH1 U OIVS ,LV GVVaH Hg
QAlV i[VHddV AYIQ SNOSBHd QHL53tiHLAII'I'IV
.4uau1
salep Jo Sep ayl Sulpaoajd Deaf auo iseal le Jo; suoillpuoa SuToSaao; ail [le gllm palidmoa seq Jadedsmau pm (L) SlataoS
StnuurSaq;o aag[d of
ARM ;o P{SiJ ptes Svols flaalsamylnoS aaua4l:daml[eg
[ealJolslH a1glS ayl glim i[alelpaunul anssl gaea;o tdoa n saP; Jadedsmau PigS (9) 'Palwd sl Jadedsmou ples y314m
TOM 1S V MITHIM11W 'o8eapla ;o AvAi ;o lgSu q P
1e pue smoy ssau[snq selnSau yons i[e Su1mp [oJluoa pue uo1laBJ.p sly of 13a[gns pue Solduia all u[ suosJad `iadedsmau
suleyo oo•Z aun 1sJi; glim lalleJed pue A1Jag1JON aauagl
pies ;o Jaal;;o SulSeuevi a41 (q paule;uleui pue suo1Iduasgns ;o ales pue sluawas llanpe ;o ales `smau jo Swayle8
yulod a o; suM3 WS demlteg road '19 21 M(nemP.iH
agl Jo; smoy ssauisng JeploaJ sll Sump undo Pug PagMgeJso 'AI— Ples ul e*-wo ;o AM a41 ul a-v! ;o -WO
'OReTO ;0 XvAk ;o 4q2u qPA+ jangled A}JaVvayl
umou>( sli sgg Pi pue JanJea ;o Clvnoa ayl ul eNsega 3o h1la a41 aA.tas OJ spodmd ladedsrau pTvS (S) 'aaiilo-lsod
-Joel aauagl :sulega oo•Z aJae (1) auo Ples )o ou.q
leaol sl1 u1 sa7lem ssela_puoaas se falua seq pue mace ut syluovl aamp umn aJoui ou Jo pled Apuauna uogelna no pgol
a.
wag 9-19 Limos -umv sulvum we (v auo paldaa
sJi 3O %9L IS-[ le;o ORUJane ve seq'sJaquasgns Su[.Sed of paJaAl[ap AlaelnSaJ saidoa ooS imal Iv seq'aAJae o; niod.md li
galg I gl P PalelnaJla s, Jadedsmau 1
m i11 edlanmtu a Jeau ue Ut P eS (b) 'quatuaspsanpe pue Jallew aleld `slualed;o Sl-qua
sa >, o JauJOa
^� a� lseaglJON all le 1..;aE..UIfI70a
do opeut lou s1 pue uotleaggnd Jaylo ,fun a1e311dnp Allogm lou swop pue aAJas of spodmd li galgm 4pmunuoa ayl of
:smono; se paquasap awe (1) auo Su1ldaosa OS -IV
•SuluulSaq;o aasid O7 See►
lsaJalul ieaol;o Mau of paloeap suumloa smau 911 JO %oS nq Jaded smau pleS (&) •Jlaam a aauo legal le PaingiJig!P sl Pvg
ARaam a sl Jadedsmau P1eS (Z) 'sagaul aJenbs 006 lseai 1e of aaeds Mupd u1 lualenmbo uvo; lamp pug uumloa ul
;o IOJ Pfm BOOM AIJOI-M aauayl :demlieg lned '1S il
`o8salya
pue
Jadedsmau u1 aSenSuei ys[ISuH ayl ul palwd s< Jadedsmav PP'S (T) : smonol se palels mjaq slae; ayl;o aSpalmouX
a33lnemllyq
jo Se a;o Pg Ol svIgga 997 WONleuuo;
aauayl .smega 00'9 1seH aouagl !sulggo SL'i g1no5
Tln) seq Pug PleaaH f4MO'J JaAJe� se umoml Jadedsmau a n io Ja1wd pue Jagsllgnd a41 uaaq seq palele u!aK aulq a p Pg
Surmp pue sr ay s es yleo uo `uJoms Rlnp Sulaq `— - --
aauagl ;su[ega OZ'6 41JON Pvg a
sg[gg 00'1 WotA sJeaq
`m `911 '91
PTT,Z S �ZO LIES ra
agueg dPlswOl Pug ZI guOT -" uaamloq
Jauaoa vollaas Javenb aql yanlm;o lulod a le Sulvul8ag
:smo[lo; se pagiJasap aJJe (T) auo vioJ;aiagl Hu1ldang
,sails SS'90I Inge Sunneluoa';x a8ueg'9I1 dI. 'ol
( jomuo jo A}unoo
El vo1laag ul' iemneg Ined '1S'9 aaJ[nsmllW lo8sapo
aql ;o qlnos Builll (►hHN 3o zAtA) lop" lsgaglJoN
SS /
agP )O RvH 1saAA MJO lied Imp lie Pug (*hag Io tTMN)
l
�alJena lseaylnOS ay1 JO JOI-mb lsamglJON ag.L..
( eloS2uulw 10 ales
:Puel 3O hail pagiJlsap Purmono; aql Jo; `1114sIQ Jell
-uap1-m IemllnalJSV `VI-H 07 '1aljlma luauudolanaa
1iu(l Pauueld 'Z-d UJOJI SuTuozaJ ayl Japtsuol of Hnlavag
ingnd a Sulpiog 3o asodand agl Jo; 10961 'Jaqumldag
I° ANP g10i agl 'SMmupaAA uo •cn•d Sp:L le laam
JPIA'elosauvlyq'uasseyuega;o Alta ayi;o voted -OD
Suluue[d agl 1VH.L NHAI9 AgHflHHH SI 33UON
''1 3NMIAi
'NHSSVHNVHa `'HaNI10a A.LIa aw NO.
9NINNV'Id 3HI Ag NOIJA)W NO '1,. )i' 7VLL
-NHOISHg WVfl.L7S13IH!)V `V H Olt d.,i Isla
uopeaiignd
ZINR Q3NNV7d 'Z•d i —VA
;o JiilepiLNHiNId07HAH(I
�
9NINOZH1d a03 !)MuvwH aI'Ignd do 3JIlU�i
VJDs1FL\Tw'SMIKr
NId3NNHH GNV NHAIIVa
NHSSVHNVW 90 A.Lia
(uop-11gnd PialAO r6n)
•Agaadoad goaCgns
aqg aOJ aurrg stgg gn papuaunuooaa ATguasaad sT pun obn gguotu auo
ATagnuiTxoaddn Agaadoad guouIXPO aqg aoJ TTounoO AgTO oqg Aq uaxng gang og
TnoTguapT sT pasodoad uoTgon aqy •auitg go poTaad aTgnuosaaa a
uTggTM an000 you saop guauIdoTanap 9T buTuoz TnuTbTao sgT og pauozaa
Agaadoad aqq annq og ssaooad aqg agnTgTuT og uotssTunuoO butuunTd
aqg goaaTp Anuz TTounoO AgTO aqg 4Pg4 sagngs Lt, aouautpaO 90 LO'tT
uoTgoaS 'gozagsTQ guauidoTanaQ gzun pauunTd 'Z-d n snq Agaadoad
goaCgns aqq `ZL6T `Aannaga3 �o dnui butuoz TnToT��o aqg og buTpaoaoV
MOOVIE
l�
:Jpuno0 fq i040y
7
ry
Tnsodoad buTuozag Agaodoad uauuTS :f9f1S
086T `T gsnbnv :ajVC,
ggaoMgsV uoQ ' aabnuays AgTO : WOUJ
TTounoO AgTO pun a0l nPW :OS
wnaNvuowaw
9888-tiLti (Zl9)
Ll£55 ` IOS3NNIW "N3SSVHNVH3eLt l X08 O"d*3AIU0 0a3d V-1 019L
Nsssvnxvno
y9�..
Yt l '.W IRD
C - y J
POND \ O • 1 _xy
ti
I/ V I 99vx' 4 n _ E40.E
MILLO
L P `V�.J
-- L KE LUCY -- v KRONEN TUS
m 4RRpW f
U.0
LAKE
LAK£ ANN
F-
I' T>, I �I
Mo
0 m
A S,iNTA-V
OOO _ 10. f 7500
2
U C F1 Q
ST
1 A R v, tp^— i t x Q- --T700
waRl u e NaR; Lrl�i; 7 4
U V4 C NTT RDAD !6 1
PARR N I I WEST SST B �p
U 41
CT 'vp I P I i I---7800
rP Q W 4
I g O o
7900
p0 H F-
QOP`�
� � I HIGHW A'1 ��' —r 1 8000
oNo-li / / 5 c`RC.E ( I E aRrvg I \ • \,., 8100
/ ANE CIR I V '
D0.1VE -6200
LAKE SUSAN
89
I �
RICE MA LAKE
:I
96 rN $i
�_ Pcwnr� 8600.
0
8700
= 1
o
> ( L Bsao
z ®POMP
%/
7 B9o0
I 1 SUNSET
TRAIL
BO
(�Q
I LYMA ULE VARO-
I - 4 I , 9000
I iI I r 9100
9200
1
LAKE
_ 9300
i R/LFY
i I 4
--- _ _ Z
9400
9500
TI k I - 1 I�W ^600
>
t J I
II W
1 y f I I = 9700
ti,�Kt• rAIL � I ,I i � � I P0�0
9000o0
Nt
I G
r
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE OF HEARING
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF CARVER
ss.
)
it
Donald Ashworth _, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes
and says that he is and was on _ Au -ust __.21 __, 19 g 0 , the duly qualified. and
acting City Clerk -Administrator of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said.
date he caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of hearing on a
Rezoning Request of the Sinnen Property (P-2 to R-lA) in the
City to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said
notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes
addressed to all such owners in the United States mails with postage fully prepaid
thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such
by the records of -the County Treasurer of Carver County, Minnesota, and by other
appropriate records.
City Manager
Subscribed and sworn to before me .... ..
this a/,at day of ,.,.lg`-,fv
Notary Public
1 /=:'`'"`S KAREN J. ENGELHARDT
NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA
}9 CARVER COUNTY
My Commission Expires Oct. 11, INS
Kenneth & L . Groen
8108 Dakota Lane
C.ianhdssen, MN 55317
Timothy & Nancy Herburg
8113 Erie Circle
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Daryl & A. Kempf6rt
8118 Erie Circle
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Robert C. & K. Woodford
8112 Dakota Lane
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Chanhassen Post No. 580
7995 Plaines Boulevard
Chanhassen, MN 55317
August J. Sinnen
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Richard $ P. Donnay
8109 Dakota Avenue
Chanhassen, MN 55317
i;
Howard & A. Bennidt
8115 Erie Circle
Chanhassen, MN 55317
i
William & S. Dickman
j; 8116 Erie Circle
i;
Chanhassen, MN 55317'
Albert Sinnen
j 8750 Grandview
Chanhassen, MN 55317
!3
I.
4i
' T. Sexton
8210 Grandview
;t Chanhassen, MN 55317
t
i�
I!
II
4!
�E
f;
�I
i
�I
ii
i�
I�
ii
!t
i
II=
i
fir
I
L,
I
I:
11.
i
r Patrick & S_ Craig.
--�8111 Erie Circle
Chanhassen,, MN 55317
i! ..
George & Diane Frey
8117Erie Circle
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Jeffrey & B . Essen
8114 Erie Circle
':'Chanhassen,. MN 55317
' 11. A. VanSly'ke
8155 Grandview
Chanhassen, MN 55317
i
t Raymond Nagle
8201 Grandview
Chanhassen., MN 55317
i
i;
M
a
1NANdOl3n3O ONV-1 • SIVSIVHddV • -1VIO83NNOO • SWHVJ • IVI1N341S3H
V38V VANO13NNIV4 3NVI ONV NVgunenS 1S3M 3H1 NI 31VIS3 IV38
i20. ce' ��b'HNt/HD
3OV I -I IA
C A1303H
6L61 d3S
c
sai nso pua
sp : 9v
lodoo - ZIZ 3 1+
' ON I 'suGNV-d3133diS
f — I�'dO `/Ipu l aSau'i P IV
r
'Alaiaouls
'6L61 `Z aagoaoo j0 6upaaw aqa le Iiouno3 a44 Aq uopoe
.aoj epua6e uo aq 'pauo14uaw anoge aqj jeqj asanbaa am
pue 'a6ue4oxa aq4 buimogs spoap a44 jo saidoo aje pasol3u3
'pue Ije3oW
pue puejeAGIJ uaaM4aq a6uegoxa pueL a44 04 aAljelaa
'uoildijosap spunoq pue so4aw aql 10 6uipaooaa N4 Ilwiad
o4 aoueuipao uOISIAip-qns aqj Jo aaAieM a Isanba.I AgaaaH
LL99-8174 (ZL9) 'BLESS V1OS3NNIW 'VNSVHO 'ZLZ# AVMHE)IH '3 LOL
L6Z9-tiLY (ZL9) 'ElT99 V1OS3NNIW VNNOI3NNIW 'L AVMH`JIH LLLLL
!gl.IOMgsy •aW jeao
LL£SS •uuiW 'uassequego
ja6eueW Aaio
glioMgsd U00 • aw
6M 1£1 jagwagdaS
.3,I '.LS3M saoi�vaa
S 11MG �Ijv
7610 LAREDO DRIVEoP.O. BOX 147sCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(61 Z 474-8885
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 16, 1979
TO: City Manager, Don Ashworth
FROM: Asst. Manager/Planner, Bob Waibel
SUBJ: Environmental Assessment Worksheets, Hidden Valley Estates,
and Western Hills 3rd Addition
Attached hereto, for your information, are the environmental assessment
worksheets for the subject development as required under _the Minnesota
Environmental Policy Act. Both developments exceed the threshold
for EAW in -'that they propose more than 50 residential units within
1,000 feet of a wetland or public waters. This office, has found
that the projects are not major actions, do not have the potential
for significant environmental -effects, and are of not more than
local significance and recommend that -.no environmental impact statement
is needed. These findings will be certified and forwarded to
the director of the Environmental Quality Board of the State Planning
Agency.
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7610 LAREDO DRIVE&P 0. BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
PLANNING REPORT
DATE: August 7, 1979
TO: Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Assistant Manager/Planner, Bob Waibel
SUBJ: Preliminary Development Plan Review, Hidden Valley Estates
APPLICANT: Rumar, Inc.
PLANNING CASE: P-597
Petition
The applicant is requesting to construct 40 single family and 5 duplex
units on the areas indicated as Phase I and Phase II on the attached
development plan.
Comments
The following is a list of planning issues for consideration during
the preliminary development plan review process.
1. Phases III and IV being indicated as R-3 and R-4 building status
should not be considered anything other than outlot at this time.
It will be recommended that the entire holdings be platted and that
the Phase III and IV portion be platted as outlot.
2. The applicant will need to negotiate with the American Legion as
to the means of constructing the road from TH 101 to West 80th Street.
It is recommended that road construction be terminated at this inter-
section until it is determined that the remainder of this frontage
road is needed to be completed. An easement for the future road
connection from West 80th Street to the vicinity of the southeast
corner of outlot A should be included on the plat of the property.
3. The applicant should contact the building department for the
proper theme and alphabetization for the names of the proposed streets.
4. The applicant should submit for preliminary development plan review,
the square footages of the proposed lots.
a Planning Commission -2- August 7, 1979
5. The city engineer should report as to the buildable soils and slope
conditions in the vicinity of lots 20, 40, 30 and 41-45.
6. The planning staff along with the city engineer, will determine
any necessary measures needed to be taken before final plat so as to
assure that the area indicated at phase IV cannot become land locked
with single access indicated as Valley View Drive. The
attachea plans have been submitted to the fire department for their
consideration and the fire marshal's comments will be available before
public hearing.
7. The subject plans will be submitted to the Park and Recreation
commission for their comments on August 14, 1979. The items for
discussion by the Park and Recreation Commission are presently whether
or not a conservation easement should be considered along the southern
portion of the property in the vicinity of the interceptor sewer, and
whether or not a conservation/trail easement should be considered along
the creek traversing the property from the northwest to the southeast.
Recommendation
I recommend that the Planning Commission order a public hearing con-
ditioned upon the applicant submitting a abstractor's certificate
with the names and addresses of property owners within 350 feet of the
subject property, and that the applicant post an escrow deposit with
the city treasurer's office in the amount of $1,500 to defer staff
costs in processing this application.
WILLIAM D. SCHOELL �,
f
CARLISLE MADSON
JACK T. VOSLER
JAMES R. ORR
HAROLD E. DAHLIN
LARRY L. HANSON
_
RAYMOND J. JACKSON
WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY
JACK E. GILL
RODNEY B. GORDON
THEODORE D. KEMNA
JOHN W. EMOND
KENNETH E. ADOLF
WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT
BRUCE C. SUNDING
R. SCOTT HARRI
City of Chanhassen
P. 0. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Gentlemen:
— SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC.
ENGINEERS ANO SURVEYORS
1612) 938-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343
OFFICES AT HURON, SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON, TEXAS
April 2, 1979
Subject: Rumar Inc. Sketch Plan
We have reviewed the Sketch Plan as prepared by Criteria,
Inc. for the proposed development of the former Sinnen property
south of Highway 5 and east of Trunk Highway 101.
The street layout is adequate except that the frontage road
entrance should be moved southerly approximately 120 feet as
shown on the attached Plan. The relocation will provide adequate
stacking distance between the frontage road and Trunk Highway 5,
and aligns the frontage road with the proposed westerly extension.
WJBrezinsky:srt
attachment
Very truly yours,
SCHOELLL & MADSON, INC.
`2w' a e4c& 41
Riley- Purgatory Creek Watershed District
89SO COUNTY ROAD #4
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55343
June 13, 1979
Mr. Bob Weibal
City of Chanhassen
7610 Laredo Drive
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
Re: - Hidden Valley Estates Development
Dear Mr. Weibal:
The engineering advisors to the Board of Managers of the Riley -Purgatory
Creek Watershed District have reviewed the -preliminary plans as submitted
to the District for the Hidden Valley Estates Development in Chanhassen. The
following policies and criteria of the Watershed District are applicable for
this proj ect :
1. The District is concerned with carrying storm water drainage in
open channels as shown on the preliminary plan. The District recom-
mends that storm water be carried in storm sewer pipe. If this
option is not feasible, the District will require that the city
demonstrate that the storm water carried in open channels will not
create the potential for erosion problems.
2. In accordance with Section E(2) of the District's Rules and Regula-
tions, a grading and land alteration permit application is required
for this project. Accompanying this permit application, a detailed
erosion control plan outlining how sediment will be prevented from
leaving the altered areason the site both during and after construc-
tion must be submitted to the District for review and approval.
3. A detailed storm sewer plan must be submitted to the District for
review and approval.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this development at an early
date. If you have any questions regarding the District's comments, please
contact us at 920-0655.
Sincerely,
Robert C. Obermeyer
BARR ENGINEERING CO.
Engineers for the District
RCO/111
cc: Mr. Conrad Fiskness
Mr. Frederick Richards
Mr. Dean Gatzlaff
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O. BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
PLANNING REPORT
DATE: February 27, 1979
TO: Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Assistant City Manager/Planner, Bob Waibel
SUBJ: Criteria, Inc. PRD Proposal
APPLICANT: Rumar, Inc.
PLANNING CASE: P-597
C'_nmmPn is
This particular item was before the Planning Comission in June, 1978,
for sketch plan review. Since that time the applicant had been
twice requested to work out alternative road designs that would
reflect the recommended frontage road between Dakota Avenue and Truck
Highway 5 as per the BRLJ frontage road study.. The revised sketch
plan dated February 20, 1979, shows the frontage road to have a
common boundary between the subject development and the Legion
Club property, and has essentially taken care of the problems previously
encountered with the proposed curves. I believe that the city engineer
should take a closer look at the now proposed stacking distance
between the intersection of Highway 101 and the frontage road and
MTH 5 for it's adequacy, and it's proper alignment to the continuation
of the frontage road to the west.
As per previous conversations with the developer, staff understands
that the developer is not proposing any plans for the multiple units
at this time and is only representing the plan for the single family
aspectsof the development.
At this time the planning commission should restrict their comments
to the plans consistency with the city's ordinances, policies, and
plans.
Recommendation
I recommend that the planning commission encourage the applicant to
proceed with the preparation of preliminary development plans pursuant
to ordinance 47 and ordinance 33.
Twins Leasing Lnc.
6975 Washington Avenue South
Edina, Minnesota 55435
Telephone: 941-7111
Cars & Trucks —All Makes .Furniture Tools Machinery Equipment
October 2, 1978
Mr. Bob Waibel
Assistant City Planner
City of Chanhassen
7610 Laredo Drive
P.O. Box 1/.7
Chanhassen, MN 55317
('1 Dear Mr. Waibel:
RE: Planning case P-565
According to the planning report we received from Criteria.Architects,
Inc., you need the following information.
NAME: TWINS LEASING, INC.
ADDRESS: 6975 Washington Ave. South
Edina, Mid 55435
President: Ruben H. Anderegg
PHONE: 941-7111
Yours truly,
TWINS LEASING, INC.
geL1/�t--u_r�
Q� 12 3 S
RHA/dw R. H. Anderegg '1 4
President 6'
OCT 1978
cc
CNJ� CE1'V
1r/LL�4G
c�ANMASg
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O. BOX 147*CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
PLANNING REPORT
DATE: September 25, 1978
TO: Planning Commission, Staff and Gary Allan, Criteria, Inc., 100
First Street North, Minneapolis, MN 55401
FROM: Assistant City Planner, Bob Waibel
SUBJ: Criteria, Inc., Planned Residential Development, Sketch Plan
Re't.riew
APPLICANT: Criteria Architects, Inc.
PLANNING CASE: P-6:&5 'Tg 7
Planner's Comments
Attached is the planning report of June 23, 1978, concerning the
subject proposal. That report, is essentially still valid for the
currently attached revised sketch plan from Criteria. The differences
are that some of the residential street patterns have been altered
to adcommodate the frontage road that is recommended in the BRW study.
The only addendum to this report would be that I feel a better stacking
pattern could be developed where this proposed area would egress onto
MTH 101. Specifically, I would prefer that the T intersection situation
at Highway 101 be eliminated through realignment of interior streets.
I believe this could be done without significant loss of buildable
area.
As in the planning report, I recommend that the planning commission
encourage the petitioner to prepare preliminary development plans. Said
plans should attempt to augment the mentioned T intersection.
The applicant should be advised that the mulitiple unit areas of the
development will need to be reviewed in further steps in the magnitude
of detail prescribed by ordinance.