Loading...
78-05 - Park One PUD pt 3CITY ''OF CHANHASSEN �g s 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 0 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 MEMORANDUM TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager FROM: Bill Monk, City Engineer DATE: August 8, 1983 SUBJ: Park One Improvements Attached is a copy of the construction plans for the extension of West 77th Street in Park One as authorized by Council resolution of May 16, 1983. I have worked closely with Schoell and Madson, Inc. on the preparation of these plans and am satisfied they meet all Council conditions and City standards including the develop- ment of a northern drainage system. As you may remember, at the hearing the developer questioned staff's position that only a portion of tax increment generated by this district be allocated to finance these improvements. Since that time an agreement on the allocation of TID revenues has been reached and is summarized in the letter (attached) from Jules Smith dated July 25, 1983. In this agreement, increment generated by Lyman Lumber is to be held in reserve to insure par- tial financing of West 184th Avenue in the future. I believe all matters are now in order so the project is ready to proceed. Therefore, it is the recommendation,of this office that the attached construction plans and specifications be approved along with the intent of the developer's agreement contained in Mr. Smith's letter. Action by City Administrnfdr, E.1dorsed ✓ Modified itejecte Date D!to submitted to Commissi^R 0--le Sub:milel to Counc,'f 8/,e �p 3 JULIUS C. SMITH Attorney at Law 215 YORKTOWN OFFICE COURT 7101 YORK AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55435 (612) 831-8530 July 25, 1983 Mr. William Monk City Engineer City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 RE: West 77th Street Improvements Park One and Park One Second Addition Dear Mr. Monk, I am writing this letter on behalf of Frank Beddor, Jr. and E. Jerome Carlson, the owners of Park One, to confirm the discussion between Frank Beddor, Jr., Daryl Fortier and myself and Don Ashworth, Scott Martin and you the morning of July 20 relative to the extension of West 77th Street (including sewer and water installation, drainage swales, curb and gutter and other work - the "improvement"), not only to the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Park One Second Addition as a condition of the approval of that plat, but also as to the continuance of 77th Street to 184th Street. As indicated by your letter, and the attachments thereto, dated June 20th, 1983, it is our understanding that the construction costs, including admini- strative costs, for extending the improvements to 184th Street would be in the neighborhood of $170,000 - $1.75,000, and, with interest costs included, would be somewhere in the neighborhood of a total cost of $220,000.00. It is our understanding that the City will agree to use all the unallocated tax increment funds in Tax Increment District No. 2 generated by the present improvements on Lot 1, Block 1 of Park One Second Addition (the original Press building plus Phases A and B Additions thereof), which unallocated increment amount is presently estimated by the City to be approximately $116,000, and apply it to the cost of the improvements. That the additional cost of the improvements (approximately $104,000) would then be assessed in a proportional way (based on normal MSA Ch. 429 municipal assessment practices) against Outlot A of Park One and Lot 2, Block 1, Park One Second Addition. It is further our understanding that those assessments would be reduced by an amount equal to any additional increment received from future additions to The Press building or any other buildings built in Park One or Park One Second Addition. It is understood by us, of course, that the City Council, as a condition of Mr. William Monk July 25, 1983 Page 2 approval for the plat of Park One Second Addition, has stated no further build- ings, other than additions to The Press building on Lot 1, Block 1, will be approved without the construction of the 184th access to S.T.H. No. 5. In view of the fact that we agree to take these assessments on the land indi- cated to cover the additional cost involved in extending the improvements beyond the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Park One Second Addition, the City would not require a letter of credit covering those assessments, and would use all projected increment from future construction (that is, beyond the construction of Phase B of The Press building) to be realized each year during the life of the tax increment district and apply such increment against the amount of those assessments due each year. We realize that the amount to be assessed - over and above $116,000.00 of current increment expected - will be assessed by the Council at a later time. We would request -that the assess- ment be made for as long a period as possible - up to 10 years;' ears and we would like to participate in the formula used in spreading those assessments on the land indicated. To that end, we will submit for your consideration a list of parcels and the amount or percentage of the assessment against each. If this letter correctly states our understanding, please initial the enclosed copy where indicated and return it to me. Thank you. Yours very trruuly, Julius C. Smith Encl. JCS/eg cc. Mr. Don Ashworth Mr. Scott Martin Mr. Frank Beddor, Jr. Mr. E. Jerome Carlson Mr. Daryl Fortier Mr. Lawrence B. Carlson The above reflects our under- standing and is approved: William Monk CITY OF 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 A CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 June 20, 1983 Mr. Julius Smith Attorney at Law 7101 York Ave. South Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55435 Dear Mr. Smith: As per our recent phone conversation, an update of the status of TID No. 2 is attached. This update includes The Press' Phase B and project expenditures to be incurred as a result of the Rice Marsh Lake Drainage Project. The update notes that approximately $219,167 in unallocated funds will be generated by the district north of TH 5 through 1989. Of these funds, $103,060 (47%) will be generated by Lyman Lumber while the balance are generated by The Press. As you are aware, it is staff's recommendation that only 50% of the increment (or 100% as generated by The Press) be pledged for improvements within Park One and that the balance be reserved for the costly TH 5 improvements. This is intended to insure comple- tion of the improvements as outlined in the feasibility study while allowing for a more logical method of allocating funds based on benefit. Also attached is an updated cost estimate for the extention of improvements to 184th Street. Total project costs, including engineering, legal and administrative costs is estimated at $170,000 to $175,000. Please note that these project costs do not include interim interest charges which could prove significant. Any comparisons of project costs versus available increment must take interest charges into account to allow for a true comparison. Should you have any questions concerning this data, please let me know. Also, I will need to meet with the developers in the near future to decide the limits of the West 77th Street construction, Julius Smith -2- June 20, 1983 especially if the item must again go before the City Council. If this project is to be constructed this year, things will need to proceed quickly. Sincerely, William Monk City Engineer WM:k cc: Don Ashworth, City Manager Frank Beddor PLANNING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING ARCHITECTURE BENNETT. RINGROSE. WOLSFELD. JARVIS. GARDNER. INC. • 2829 UNIVERSITY AVENUE SE • MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55414 • PHONE 6121379-7878 June 7, 1983 Bill Monk Chanhassen City Engineer 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Bill: As per your request, following are current cash flow runs for the north and south halts of TID No. 2. The cash flow table lists the transactions for the north and the south halts and is followed by the cash flow runs for both halves. The assumptions for these runs are the same as for the November 4th, 1982 run for the total District. The allocation of property values is based upon the values of the parcels in each half. The cash flow runs show that the north half will generate $431,901 and the south half $514,203 of tax increment income over the life of the District. If one assumes that project administration and design costs for the District will be approximately $50,000 and that the proposed drainage project will cost $415,500, including bonding and interest costs, the expenditures for the District will total $465,500. If one assigns these costs against the two halves based upon the income they generate one arrives at the following totals: Item District North South Total Half Half 1. Tax Increment Income $946,104 $431,901 $514,203 2. Percentage of Total Income 100% 45.7% 54.3% 3. Projected Expenses $465,500 $212,734 $252,766 4. Remainder $480,604 $219,167 $261,437 L:; Y OF CHANHAS:="I MINNEAPOLIS DENVER CHEYENNE PHOENIX Ohl Bill Monk June 7, 1983 Page 2 One variable in these calculations is the mill rate. A mill rate of 95 was used for the above cash flow runs whereas the current mill rate for the District is 102.025. If the mill rate were to remain around 100 for the life of the District, an additional $45,000 of tax increment income would be generated for the total District. I hope this will be of help to you. Sincerely, If you have any questions, please call me. BENNETT RINGROSE WOLSFELD JARVIS GARDNER, INC. (5 i . �Cv-�- Arijs Pakalns, AIA, AICP Associate AP:sh Enclosure Ij T� 3k4o CZ : co I L co : o .. j r i ig 10 t i $`: I ; o i -- -- -L- -- -- -: - 8' - - uLD: - -- - - - - --- -- -- -- $ - — - LIr- 7-- - ._ ---- - CO a - �,- — o - 8-_ - 0 S - —. 1 _ :::� -- ���.os- � •_ --- - �. —� � to _I ;- ,— -.- _ F � I I i1r I Tt AL V lL► v TID NO2 NORTH HALF 6/6/1983 DEBT SERVICE PLANNING BASE YEAR COMPUTATION YEAR VALUE MILLS 1980 763r000 95.000 ADJ 0.60 REV. PROJ. TAX YEAR A V INCRE 1980 763r0OO 0 1981 IP2497000 0 1982 IP286r000 24r932 1983 IP325r000 29r600 1984 1r849,000 31rB12 1985 IY904r000 58.9915 1986 IP961P000 64024 1987 2rO20POOO 67r961 1988 2rO81r000 71r313 1989 2r143000 74078 1990 -1,8a(. -IbTAL- INCKEME.MT = 4,43119of TID NO2 SOUTH HALF 6/6/1983 DEBT SERVICE PLANNING BASE YEAR COMPUTATION YEAR VALUE MILLS 1980 99r000 95.000 ADJ 0.60 REV. PROJ. TAX YEAR A V INCRE 1980 99r000 0 1981 102r000 0 1982 105r000 154 1983 IP484P000 325 1984 1r5'29r000 71,085 1985 1r575r000 81r254 1986 1,622,000 83r870 1987 IY670P000 86r543 1988 1r721r000 89,273 1989 1r772r000 92r163 1990 91 636 "TOTAL IMCKE.MEHT = +s14j'2.02> 6/ 6/03 LAND SALES, OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6/ 6/83 LANK SALES OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BOND PROCEEDS 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 BOND PROCEEDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECPT'S 0 0 24r932 29r600 31,812 58r915 64,724 67r961 71r313 74r778 TOTAL RECPT'S 0 0 154 325 71r085 01r254 83,870 86r543 89,273 92r163 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA aRESOLUTION 83-26 ORDERING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR PARK ONE WHEREAS, the Chanhassen City Council, acting pursuant to Chapters 273 and 472A of Minnesota Statutes, established Tax Increment District No. 2 by resolutions No. 80-54 and 81-26 dated December 15, 1980 and August 3, 1981, respectively, and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen City Council by its resolution dated May 2 , 1983, formally received an engineering Feasibility Study detailing certain improvements within the plat of Park One as prepared by Schoell & Madson, Inc., and dated December 8 ,' 1980, and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen City Council on August 2, 1982, reviewed and approved a site plan for development within Park One known as "The Press Expansion" and accepted a petition for the construction of certain public improvements within the plat of Park One, and WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted.the 2nd day of _ Mav , 1983 , fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed improvement of the plat of Park One, according to the plat on file in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, with the construction of West 77th Street, a service road, and West 184th Avenue and the construction of sanitary sewer facilities, hard surfaced streets, concrete curbs and gutters, and drainage facilities within said plat, all as more particularly described in the Schoell & Madson, Inc. Feasibility. Study dated December 8, 1980, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk, and WHEREAS, ten day's published notice of the hearing through two weekly publications of the required notice was given and mailed notice was given and the hearing was held thereon on the 2nd day of May 1983, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CIANHASSEN, MINNESOTA: 1. The C -)icil hereby orders an imp'wement consisting of the construction of full utility and street improvements,'. sanitary sewer, watermain, paving, concrete curbs and gutters, and drainage facilities from the northerly terminus of West 187th Avenue on the westerly line of the above described nlat of Park One in an easterly direction to a point on the easterly line of said plat approximately 647 feet northerly of the southeasterly corner of said plat. 2. Schoell and Madson, Inc. is hereby_ designated as the engineer for the aforesaid improvements, and said engineer is hereby directed to prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvements. 3. The Council hereby declares its intent to assess, pursuant to Chapter 429 of Minnesota Statutes, all or a portion of the aforesaid improvements,to all of the lots and outlots in the aforesaid plat of Park One, and further declares its intent to pay all unassessed costs of said improvements from tax increments which may be generated from that portion of Tax Increment District No. 2 which lies northerly of State Trunk Highway No. 5. Adopted by the Council this 1983. Attest /1 City Clerk: Manager Yes Hamilton eying Horn Watson Swenson 16th day of -May / Mayor No Absent None None -2- REGULAR CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY 16, 1983 Mayor Hamilton ca ed the meeting to order w,_n the following members present: Councilwomen Watson and Swenson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. T meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. Don Ashworth, Scott Martin, Bill Monk, and Bob Waibel were present. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Councilwoman Swenson moved to approve the agenda as presented with the following additions: Carver Beach Park Property, Board of Review Meeting May 23, Street Maintenance, and Mark Corpron - Eagle Scout. Motion seconded by Councilman Horn. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Gevin and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. CONSENT AGENDA: Item (c) Sign Ordinance Amendment was removed from the Consent Agenda. Councilman Horn moved to approve the following Consent Agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: a. Resolution #83-25 Approving Proposed Program for Use of Year IX Urban City Community Development Block Grant Funds. b. Adopt 1982 Edition of the Uniform Building Code, Ordinance 23-C. d. Kennel License Application, 27 Acre Parcel on the South and East Side of Lake Lucy Road and Galpin Blvd. e. Lake Ann Park One Day Special Event, Newfoundland Dog Club. Motion seconded by Councilwoman Watson. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING PARK ONE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Mayor Hamilton called the hearing to order with the following interested persons present: Larry Schroers, 6770 175th Ave West, Eden Prairie Chuck Schroers, 3201 Edgewood Ave., St. Louis Park Frank Beddor, Jr., 910 Pleasant View Road, Chanhassen Jules Smith, 7101 York Ave. So., Minneapolis Daryl Fortier Daryl Fortier - My client has advised me that he is in full support of the motion tonight and I would like to present a little background on the pro- ject and our understanding of what the extent of authorization is for the project. This is Park One as originally presented to you some years back and its recent approval was agreed upon as recently as last fall, I belie% when we went ahead with construction of Phase A, The Press addition. We are still contemplating that this area will go industrial and that there will be ponding.to the north and that eventually this will link up to Highway 5. Presently, this drawing shows you what the development looks like at this time with one exception. This also points out the improve- ments at the minimum being requested by The Press addition. They want. to see at least the road extend from the extend from the existing Lyman Lumbe around to their east property line where there could be a temporary turn- around which would be graveled so that it does not have to be ripped up it the future or it could be blacktopped but we see no reason for curbing necessarily and of course we would like to see a culvert put in to rein- force the idea that in the long term drainage will go to the north. Presently we have a pond being constructed as part of the Phase B additior It's in the owners interest, as you saw from the previous drawing, as well as the entire development districts interest in getting the ponding to the Coun,ci 1 Meeting May 16, 1,83 -2- north eventually. As his building expands it will tuke over this area and demand that the drainage go to the north at some time. We have agreed thus far that as the expansion happens and as it runs out of space that would be the critical that ponding absolutely must go to the north. The condition that we understand right now, that the City is seeking, is this proposal, that is to bring West 77th right over to the Eden Prairie property line and also to develop the drainage/ponding situation, that is drainage to the north and putting in a pair of culverts so that eventually, this will now resolve the water problems for all of Park One and as the remainder deve- loper, whether it be this block or this block, they will resolve their drainage problems by tying into this system and eventually the assessments and the tax increment from whatever future development comes along would be willing to,pick up the rest of the cost and in the long term, of course, the total development down here for the Highway 5 interchange would be equitably shared among all participants. We are in support of the motion tonight to proceed with the engineering studies and to include the ponding to the north at this time, recognizing this as a maximum development at this time and the overlay as being the minimum amount of development the client wishes to pursue and the difference between the two will be deter- mined by the assessment rate which will go into the tax increment district to pay for these improvements. There was a figure mentioned of 50% and back a few years ago there was a figure mentioned of 100%, we would like to defer that entire discussion to the appropriate time. It_.could be some range in there and that range will determine how far the client can support their construction. Mayor Hamilton - Just for clarity, you mean 50% or 100% of the 60% of the money that would come out of the district. 60% comes back to the City and we are talking about either using 100% of that or something of a 60% range. Daryl Fortier - Presently, as you know, Phase B is under construction also and that will be factored into the increment in the future to see how much can be supported. We would like to just say this would be the minimum condition and this would be the maximum, we believe, by authorizing the City to proceed tonight and if you include the ponding, once the costs are identified if it be included in the cost or it can be developed privately or it can be deferred if everything must, in deed, pull back. We believe that, although it is not highly desirable, that right now the road and the water from it could be stored as there is excess capacity in that pond so it could be stored on The Press property. It's not the preferred solution. Councilman Geving - At no event will the water ever proceed to the south, is that correct? Daryl Fortier - It's partially true. That is, the intent would be to drain it to the north but it does come across here and then come across Highway 5 further to the east. It does have a baffle weir which skims the water and makes sure there are no contaminants in it, this allows controlled overflow from this point into the county ditch which has a culvert at this location. Then it flows south across Highway 5 and then it goes east of CPT. Councilman Geving - I didn't realize there was a culvert that ran south that would evenutally link up with our Rice Marsh Lake construction. Bill Monk - I believe that the front part of the drainage from the site goes under the cross culvert and some of it goes toward Mitchell Lake in Eden Prairie. L', Council Meeting M-v 16, 1983 -3- Councilman Gevin - Are there drainage culverts all the way down past Charlie Kerber's and the CPT property and then down to Mitchell Lake? Bill Monk - Yes. Councilman Gevinq - So it wouldn't drain directly south then. Bill Monk - Some does but only a small part, perhaps 1/3 of The Press sit drains towards the highway. The bulk of it will drain to the north. Councilman Gevinq - Is the construction that you have now placed there, i that completed, the berming for the pond? Daryl Fortier - No approval for Phase start for Phase A, start construction are into Phase B w, berm we are trying that should be goi it isn't. We have recently gone to the watershed to g B and at that time, because of the late construction they had asked for completion by October and we didn't until October so it has not been completed, now that w are trying to get permission, instead of seeding the to raise the elevation of the berm. There is more wor ng on this week. Councilwoman Watson - Approximately how long will it be before that northerly drainage area is complete? Daryl Fortier - We would like to see this as part of the City improvement to be done no later than this fall. Again, given the ability of the tax increment to support such improvements. Councilwoman Swenson - If my memory serves me correctly, I remember that one of the requests for completion of 184th Street was to eliminate the turn around for semi's. If you are willing to go part way and accomodate semi's when they turn around at this point, why is the paving of 184th Street even in the future? Why is this even considered in the future? Mayor Hamilton - Because of Outlot 2 plus Block 3. Maybe we don't. Daryl Fortier - Eventually the development of this area will relieve traf fic and relieve trucking from the furtherly access. Eventually it will work better for the amount .of industry that will be going in here plus Ed Prairie plus south of Highway 5 that the interchange will make sense. Councilwoman Swenson - I mentioned it at this point even though it isn't being discussed for completion at this particular time because it was a subject that came up and I have to concur wholeheartedly with Councilman Horn in that what we don't need is more lights on Highway 5. Councilman Geving - The only other question that I had, are we going to s a resolution of the parking problem in that area by extending 77th Street Daryl Fortier - The resolution of the parking so far, presently Phase B i under construction, this portion of the parking lot plus a graveled drive should be completed by June lst this will allow traffic to remove itself from the street and to park over here even while this construction is and progress. Councilman Gevinq - This letter that was written to Jules (Smith), May llth, was there a response to it? Council Meeting May 16, -1,983 -4- Jules Smith - Not yet. Obviously, we are interested either in going all the way to 184th or part of the way depending upon how this question is resolved on the tax increment because it has to do with what's it going to cost and that sort of thing. At this point we would like to get those costs and see how this is going to be resolved. I think what we are requesting tonight is, we will go at least to the cul-de-sac, obviously, it's a question of whether we go further but in order to go to the cul-de- sac you also have to do the engineering for end anyway and so we are really looking for that kind of approval. Whether we go to the cul-de-sac or a little further maybe we can get resolved in the next week or two and that will have to do with what the increment will be and that sort of thing once we have the numbers. Councilman Geving - The proposal is to extend 77th and 187th to 184th Avenue eventually, I suspect we will be calling for bids and specs on that and only then would we have an idea what those costs would be. Jules Smith - Once the engineering is done then you do one of two things, you either are going to go to 184th or to go to the cul-de-sac. Once the engineering is done we will have a pretty good idea of what that cost is and what the increment is and we will be able to sit down and talk about it before that question comes up where you actually are going to issue a contract. „ Councilman Horn - We are supposed to be authorizing the public improvement on this project and it seems to me that we have got somewhat of a nebulous target with the road situation and I guess if we approve this tonight we are saying that we will go along with the concept of taking what we can get depending on how much we in turn tend to get back and it seems to me we are leaving an open issue. Mayor Hamilton - Well it's part of the issue unless you want to debate the whole issue tonight of the percentage of the tax increment dollars to be put back into the development area at the present time. Councilman Horn - Are we limiting our negotiating position by in effect giving concept approval to this process this evening. Are we accepting the fact that we are going to maybe only have a partial completion. Mayor Hamilton - As I see it what.we are saying is concept approval of going all the way to 184th Street and to discuss further what percentage of the tax increment dollars are going to be returned. Frank (Beddor) does not agree that it should be 50%. He would like to see another percent. I think we have all agreed on the all of the rest of it. Councilman Horn - What I am wondering is if after negotiation -is done they agree to go on to the cul-de-sac, does our approval this evening have to specify which one of those approaches we are authorizing to proceed with? Bill Monk - A.s a condition of the Park One approval the plan that is shown on the board was basically approved that a cul-de-sac had to be put to the northeast corner of the new Press. That's a requirement of the approval that the Council did last year. If the Council approves the resolution that's in here tonight they would be authorizing preparation of plans and specifications for a road that goes all the way to 184th Street as shown on the plan. If at the time the plans and specifications are finished if the Council Meeting May 16, 1983 -5- increment numbers i the engineer's estimate ,an not be worked out, I woul think that the Council may see this again with the developer in here with request that the project be downscaled only to as conditioned by the Council originally. Right now, as I understand it, they are petitioning for the extension of the road all the way out to 184th and that's how I would proceed. I think the developer wants to get some feel somewhere along the way of the Council's feel on the 50%, 100% issue of tax incremer, somewhere before the assessment stage and that could give it to the Counci one extra time and you may be asked to make some comments or some confir- mation one way or the other which way you would be inclined to go but that won't be finally taken care of until time of assessment hearing after the project is complete. Mayor Hamilton - When will we have a cost estimate? Bill Monk - If we move forward with this thing I would like to try and mov fairly quickly and will try and come back with a detailed engineer's esti- mate and plans within 30 to 45 days because if we are going to do it this year we have got to move. Don Ashworth - If you would approve it at that point in time, as far as th amount of construction to occur, and if I am hearing what the Mayor is saying, that he would like to sit down with the devel-opers and try and com back with a specific proposal to you. I strongly support firming that up before we get into the actual construction. Mayor Hamilton - We can do that after we receive the plans and specs. Daryl Fortier - I would like to add one more comment for Bill's attention. He may want to consider putting this last 350 feet into the contract docu- ments as an alternate for construction so that you do not have to retake bids, for example. If the project must be scaled back it could then be bid out and the award could be accepted minus alternate #1. Councilwoman Swenson - I have a question about the resolution. The feasi- bility study that we now have was taken in 1980 and the cost of the entire project was approximately $917,000, obviously those figures couldn't hold much water today. Bill Monk - The ones that would go along with this project have been updated to $160,000 as you see in the report. Councilwoman Swenson - In the resolution in the fourth paragraph where we fixed the date for a public hearing ordering public improvements and pre- parations I just need a clarification this, "according to the plat on file with the construction of West 77th Street, a service road, and West 184th Avenue and construction of sanitary sewer etc, etc, and yet over on the following page I see here that we are accepting these improvements in tota and yet on the top of the next page we are ordering the improvements for this particular 187th Avenue to the 647 feet, which I assume is to the cul de -sac, is that correct. My question is, by this resolution are we con- curring that the entire project is going to go through? Bill Monk - The Council may wish to move, in the fourth paragraph, whereas a resolution of the City Council accepted basically the feasibility study that was indeed feasible to proceed with the project as shown but by this motion you are ordering the improvements only over to 184th Avenue. Counc i 1 Meeting May 16, .2.983 _ 6- Councilwoman Swenson - We are in effect accepting the feasibility of 1980. How is that going to bind us to a feasibility study of 1983? Bill Monk - This is not really a feasibility study. This is just a report based on that feasibility study. The feasibility remains unchanged. It was just an updating of some of the costs included in this report. Councilman Geving moved Councilwoman Watson. The Councilwomen Swenson and votes. Motion carried. to close the public hearing. Motion seconded by following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative PARK ONE IMPROVEMENTS: RESOLUTION #83-26: Councilman Horn moved the adoption of a resolution ordering public improvements and preparations of plans for Park One. Resolution seconded by Councilwoman Watson. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. MINUTES: Add 1983, Council prefer to see basis. the following sentence under CITY ATTORNEY in the May 2, minutes: Councilwoman Watson voted no because she would more than one bid if the Council is doing this on a cost Mayor Hamilton moved to approve the May 2, 1983, Council minutes as amended. Motion seconded by Councilman Geving. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen. Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. Mayor Hamilton moved to note the May 3, 1983, Park and Recreation Commission minutes. Motion seconded by Councilwoman Watson. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, CARVER BEACH ESTATES: Councilman Geving moved to table action to June 6, 1983. Motion seconded by Councilwoman Swenson. The following voted -in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. BILLS: Councilwoman Swenson moved to approve the bills as presented: checks #14520 through #14586 in the amount of $192,376.44 and checks #18883 through #18960 in the amount of $1,853,375.18. Motion seconded by Mayor Hamilton. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. STREET FRONTAGE VARIANCE REQUEST, TRACT B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY 29: Steven Emmings is seeking approval to construct a home at 6350 Greenbriar. The property does not front on a public street and access would be via a easement across Tract C. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals recommended approval of the variance as requested. Councilwoman Swenson moved to accept the Board of Adjustments and Appeals recommendation and permit the building permit with street frontage variance request for Tract B, Registered Land Survey 29, Steven Emmings. Motion seconded by Councilman Horn. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. CITY OF f i 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 MEMORA-NDUM TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager FROM: Bill Monk, City Engineer DATE: May 16, 1983 SUBJ: Park One Improvement Hearing To formalize the City Council's action of August 2, 1982 con- cerning The Press expansion approval, it is required that a public improvement hearing be held to authorize construction of municipal facilities consistent with Chapter 429 of Minnesota Statutes. Although this hearing includes all improvements as detailed in the feasibility study, the developer is requesting installation of only the improvements shown for West 187th Avenue and West 77th Street eastward to West 184th Avenue. This request is consistent with said Council action of August 2nd and the authorizing resolution has been drafted accordingly. Although this is not an assessment hearing, the costs and financing of this project need further clarification. The total project costs for the portion under consideration are estimated at $160,000, while the increment generated by the existing construction north of TH 5 is approximately $183,400 following appropriation of revenues for the approved Rice Marsh Lake Drainage Improvement. , Although there is sufficient increment to cover the estimated project costs, staff's position, as detailed in the City Manager's letter to Jules Smith dated May 11, is that the devel- oper should be put on notice that at time of assessment, upwards of 50% of the costs may actually be levied against benefitting property in Park One. This will insure that some increment remains available for completion of the TH 5 access connection. Also, it should be noted that I am recommending that Schoell and Madson, Inc. be designated from our list of four consultants as project engineers because of the exentsive work they have already done as a part of the feasibility study preparation. Again, this is a public improvement hearing for Park One and approval of the attached resolution is required to authorize pre- paration of plans and specifications for construction of West 77th Street and West 187th Avenue eastward to West 184th Avenue. Approval is rec emended. �,- May 11, 1983 Mr. Jules Smith Attor.nev at Law 7101 York Ave. Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN CITY OF 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 South 55435 Re: East/West Frontage Road Extension, Press Property Dear Jules: The City Engineer and you are completing necessary documentation for extending the east/west frontage road through Park One. The proposed construction is within Economic Development District No. 2. Revenues from the north side of Highway 5 have been dedi- cated to complete north -half improvements. Current revenues would be sufficient to complete the east/west road without assessment. However, this office cannot recommend usage of tax increments for partial completion of improvements. Specifically, 184th Street is not proposed to be constructed at this time. There will be major oversizing and intersection costs associated with 184th..Street. If all increment monies are now dedicated to complete the east/west road, the City will find itself in the difficult position of completing 184th Street without funding and be forced to assess costs which typically benefit more than a singular parcel or more than a particular area. Accordingly, I will be recommending that, in approving the east/west construction, that no mbre than 50% of the costs of construction be paid through economic development district_ dollars. The remaining 50% would be proposed to be assessed to benefitting property. I do not believe that the above recommen- dation is in any way contradictory to previous feasibility reports. In fact, none of the previous reports considered tax increment revenues paying more than 50% and, one of those stu- dies, reflected that no more than 1/3 of the total costs be paid via economic development district dollars. Remaining economic development district dollars would be placed in reserve for off- setting construction costs of 184th Street. Jules Smith -2- May 11, 1983 F Bill:was unsure as to whether any statements made by him had conflicted with the above position. He did not believe so. To assure that there is no misunderstandings, I am placing the city staff's position in writing in advance of the public hearing. Should you have any y questions regardinr_, this letter, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Don Ashworth City Manager DA:k Cbancil Meeting August -) 1982 1—) _6- The City Manager was instructed to verify with the City Attorney whether any building permit considered for the property would require City Council action in advance of issuance. PARK ONE IMPROVEMENTS: Julius Smith and Frank Beddor were present. Julius Smith requested that the Council allow the developer to postpone utility installation until 1983 because they will not serve the addition proposed for The Press, Inc.. Mayor Hamilton moved to approve the Park )ne improvements and issue a building permit. Direct staff to prep :e a formal resolution authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications for the municipal improvements and finding the Iatition to be sufficient. Direct staff to prepare a formal resolution authorizing work as a M.S. 429 tax increment project. Waive a public hearing. A petition from the owners agreeing to pay assessments in excess of the tax increment. A development contract outlining the scope of the project including timing, assessments, increment philosophy. The bonding of r the project to be done in the Summer of 1983. Motion seconded by Councilman Geving. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilmen Neveaux, Geving, and Horii. No negative votes. Motion carried. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman Neveaux moved to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: a. Animal Control Ordinance, Impoundment Procedures and Charges for Impoundment. (Staff will rewrite the $2.00 late fee section.) b. Kerber Blvd., Chanhassen Lakes Business Park, North and South Frontage Roads East Highway 5 Public Improvement Projects. RESOLUTION #82-46 Adjusting Interest Rates. d. Boulevard Tree Policy. Motion seconded by Councilman Horn. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilmen Neveaux, Geving, and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. AGRICULTURAL PRESERVES ACT: RESOLUTION n82-47: Councilman Horn moved the adoption of a resolution certifying lands eligible for agricultural preserves as shown on Map A. Resolution seconded by Councilman Geving. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilmen Geving and Horn. Councilman Neveaux voted no. Motion carried. BUILDING PERMIT MORATORIUM ON FAST-FOOD RESTAURANTS: Mr. Beck, Attorney representing Mr. Bob Mason, was present. The Planning Commission recommended that the Council establish a 6-month limited moratorium on fast -foot restaurants for all C-2 and C-3 zoning districts lying south of Highway 5. The Assistant City Attorney reminded the Council that if they do adopt an ordinance establishing a moratorium, the Council should setforth their rationale for which they selected the properties that are subject to the moratorium. The inclusion of P-3 zoning districts was discussed. Councilman Horn asked if the moratorium could be expanded to include video arcade type of uses. The public hearing was held only on fast-food restaurants. The Assistant City Attorney stated that video arcades are not included in the present C-2 or C-3 permitted uses. A letter was received from Mr. David Sellergren, Attorney, dealing with the issue of a building permit moratorium. The Council directed the City Attorney to respond to Mr. r L�. I APO GAF �G QP /, �E Llj ROA D STATE z w a W LL O REGULAF HANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL ME- ING MAY 16, 1983 Mayor Hamilton called the meeting to order with the following members present: Councilwomen Watson and Swenson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. TI meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. Don Ashworth, Scott Martin, Bill Monk, and Bob Waibel were present. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Councilwoman Swenson moved to approve the agenda as presented with the following additions: Carver Beach Park Property, Board of Review Meeting May 23, Street Maintenance, and Mark Corpron - Eagle Scout. Motion seconded by Councilman Horn. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Gevinc and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. CONSENT AGENDA: Item (c) Sign Ordinance Amendment was removed from the Consent Agenda. Councilman Horn moved to approve the following Consent Agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: a. Resolution #83-25 Approving Proposed Program for Use of Year IX Urban City Community Development Block Grant Funds. b. Adopt 1982 Edition of the Uniform Building Code,, Ordinance 23-C. d. Kennel License Application, 27 Acre Parcel on the South and East Side of Lake Lucy Road and Galpin Blvd. e. Lake Ann Park One Day Special Event, Newfoundland Dog Club. Motion seconded by Councilwoman Watson. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING PARK ONE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Mayor Hamilton called the hearing to order with the following interested persons present: Larry Schroers, 6770 175th Ave West, Eden Prairie Chuck Schroers, 3201 Edgewood Ave., St. Louis Park Frank Beddor, Jr., 910 Pleasant View Road, Chanhassen Jules Smith, 7101 York Ave. So., Minneapolis Daryl Fortier Daryl Fortier - My client has advised me that he is in full support of the motion tonight and I would like to present a little background on the pro- ject and our understanding of what the extent of authorization is for the project. This is Park One as originally presented to you some years back and its recent approval was agreed upon as recently as last fall, I belie% when we went ahead with construction of Phase A, The Press addition. We are still contemplating that this area will go industrial and that there will be ponding to the north and that eventually this will link up to Highway 5. Presently, this drawing shows you what the development looks like at this time with one exception. This also points out the improve- ments at the minimum being requested by The Press addition. They want to see at least the road extend from the extend from the existing Lyman LumbE around to their east property line where there could be a temporary turn- around which would be graveled so that it does not have to be ripped up it the future or it could be blacktopped but we see no reason for curbing necessarily and of course we would like to see a culvert put in to rein- force the idea that in the long term drainage will go to the north. Presently we have a pond being constructed as part of the Phase B additior It's in the owners interest, as you saw from the previous drawing, as well as the entire development districts interest in getting the ponding to the Council Meeting May 16, 983 _?_ north eventually. As his building expands it will take over this area and demand that the drainage go to the north at some time. We have agreed thus far that as the expansion happens and as it runs out of space that would be the critical that ponding absolutely must go to the north. The condition that we understand right now, that the City is seeking, is this proposal, - that is to bring West 77th right over to the Eden Prairie property line and also to develop the drainage/ponding situation, that is drainage to the north and putting in a pair of culverts so that eventually, this will now resolve the water problems for all of Park One and as the remainder deve- loper, whether it be this block or this block, they will resolve their drainage problems by tying into this system and eventually the assessments and the tax increment from whatever future development comes along would be willing to pick up the rest of the cost and in the long term, of course, the total development down here for the Highway 5 interchange would be equitably shared among all participants. We are in support of the motion tonight to proceed with the engineering studies and to include the ponding to the north at this time, recognizing this as a maximum development at this time and the overlay as being the minimum amount of development the client wishes to pursue and the difference between the two will be deter- mined by the assessment rate which will go into the tax increment district to pay for these improvements. There was a figure mentioned of 50% and back a few years ago there was a figure mentioned of 100%, we would like to defer that entire discussion to the appropriate time. It could be some range in there and that range will determine how far the client can support their construction. Mayor Hamilton - Just for clarity, you mean 50% or 100% of the 60% of the money that would come out of the district. 60% comes back to the City and _ we are talking about either using 100% of that or something of a 60% range. Daryl Fortier - Presently, as you know, Phase B is under construction also and that will be factored into the increment in the future to see how much can be supported. We would like to just say this would be the minimum condition and this would be the maximum, we believe, by authorizing the City to proceed tonight and if you include the ponding, once the costs are identified if it be included in the cost or it can be developed privately or it can be deferred if everything must, in deed, pull back. We believe that, although it is not highly desirable, that right now the road and the water from it could be stored as there is excess capacity in that pond so it could be stored on The Press property. It's not the preferred solution. Councilman Gevinq - At no event will the water ever proceed to the south, is that correct? Daryl Fortier - It's partially true. That is, the intent would be to drain it to the north but it does come across here and then come across Highway 5 further to the east. It does have a baffle weir which skims the water and makes sure there are no contaminants in it, this allows controlled overflow from this point into the county ditch which has a culvert at this location. Then it flows south across Highway 5 and then it goes east of CPT. Councilman Gevin, - I didn't realize there was a culvert that ran south that would evenutally link up with our Rice Marsh Lake construction. Bill Monk - I believe that the front part of the drainage from the site goes under the cross culvert and some of it goes toward Mitchell Lake in Eden Prairie. Council Meeting May 16, 1983 -3- Councilman Geving - Are there drainage culverts all the way down past Charlie Kerber 's and the CPT property and then down to Mitchell Lake? Bill Monk - Yes. Councilman Geving - So it wouldn't drain directly south then. Bill Monk - Some does but only a small part, perhaps 1/3 of The Press sit drains towards the highway. The bulk of it will drain to the north. Councilman Geving - Is the construction that you have now placed there, i that completed, the berming for the pond? Daryl Fortier - No it isn't. We have recently gone to the watershed to g approval for Phase B and at that time, because of the late construction start for Phase A, they had asked for completion by October and we didn't start construction until October so it has not been completed, now that w are into Phase B we are trying to get permission, instead of seeding the berm we are trying to raise the elevation of the berm. There is more wor that should be going on this week. Councilwoman Watson - Approximately how long will it be before that northerly drainage area is complete? Daryl Fortier - We would like to see this as part of the City improvement to be done no later than this fall. Again, given the ability of the tax increment to support such improvements. Councilwoman Swenson - If my memory serves me correctly, I remember that one of the requests for completion of 184th Street was to eliminate the turn around for semi's. If you are willing to go part way and accomodate semi's when they turn around at this point, why is the paving of 184th Street even in the future? Why is this even considered in the future? Mayor Hamilton - Because of Outlot 2 plus Block 3. Maybe we don't. Daryl Fortier - Eventually the development of this area will relieve traf fic and relieve trucking from the furtherly access. Eventually it will work better for the amount of industry that will be going in here plus Ed Prairie plus south of Highway 5 that the interchange will make sense. Councilwoman Swenson - I mentioned it at this point even though it isn't being discussed for completion at this particular time because it was a subject that came up and I have to concur wholeheartedly with Councilman Horn in that what we don't need is more lights on Highway 5. Councilman Geving - The only other question that I had, are we going to s a resolution of the parking problem in that area by extending 77th Street Daryl Fortier - The resolution of the parking so far, presently Phase B i under construction, this portion of the parking lot plus a graveled drive should be completed by June lst this will allow traffic to remove itself from the street and to park over here even while this construction is and progress. Councilman Geving - This letter that was written to Jules (Smith), May llth, was there a response to it? Council Meeting May 16, .983 -4- Jules Smith - Not yet. Obviously, we are interested either in going all the way to 184th or part of the way depending upon how this question is resolved on the tax increment because it has to do with what's it going to cost and that sort of thing. At this point we would like to get those costs and see how this is going to be resolved. I think what we are requesting tonight is, we will go at least to the cul-de-sac, obviously, it's a question of whether we go further but in order to go to the cul-de- sac you also have to do the engineering for end anyway and so we are really looking for that kind of approval. Whether we go to the cul-de-sac or a little further maybe we can get resolved in the next week or two and that will have to do with what the increment will be and that sort of thing once we have the numbers. Councilman Gevinc - The proposal is to extend 77th and 187th to 184th Avenue eventually, I suspect we will be calling for bids and specs on that and only then would we have an idea what those costs would be. Jules Smith - Once the engineering is done then you do one of two things, you either are going to go to 184th or to go to the cul-de-sac. Once the engineering is done we will have a pretty good idea of what that cost is and what the increment is and we will be able to sit down and talk about it before that question comes up where you actually are going to issue a contract. Councilman Horn - We are supposed to be authorizing the public improvement on this project and it seems to me that we have got somewhat of a nebulous target with the road situation and I guess if we approve this tonight we are saying that we will go along With the concept of taking what we can get depending on how much we in turn tend to get back and it seems to me we are leaving an open issue. Mayor Hamilton - Well it's part of the issue unless you want to debate the whole issue tonight of the percentage of the tax increment dollars to be put back into the development area at the present time. Councilman Horn - Are we limiting our negotiating position by in effect giving concept approval to this process this evening. Are we accepting the fact that we are going to maybe only have a partial completion. Mayor Hamilton - As I see it what we are saying is concept approval of going all the way to 184th Street and to discuss further what percentage of the tax increment dollars are going to be returned. Frank (Beddor) does not agree that it should be 50%. He would like to see another percent. I think we have all agreed on the all of the rest of it. Councilman Horn - What I am wondering is if after negotiation is done they agree to go on to the cul-de-sac, does our approval this evening have to specify which one of those approaches we are authorizing to proceed with? Bill Monk - As a condition of the Park One approval the plan that is shown on the board was basically approved that a cul-de-sac had to be put to the northeast corner of the new Press. That's a requirement of the approval' that the Council did last year. If the Council approves the resolution that's in here tonight they would be authorizing preparation of plans and specifications for a road that goes all the way to 184th Street as shown one`' the plan. If at the time the plans and specifications are finished if the Council Meeting Ma.�--�6, 1983 ,. -5- increment numbers in the engineer's estimate can not be worked out, I woul think that the Council may see this again with the developer in here with request that the project be downscaled only to as conditioned by the Council originally. Right now, as I understand it, they are petitioning for the extension of the road all the way out to 184th and that's how I would proceed. I think the developer wants to get some feel somewhere along the way of the Council's feel on the 50%, 100% issue of tax incremen somewhere before the assessment stage and that could give it to the Counci one extra time and you may be asked to make some comments or some confir- mation one way or the other which way you would be inclined to go but that won't be finally taken care of until time of assessment hearing after the project is complete. Mayor Hamilton - When will we have a cost estimate? Bill Monk - If we move forward with this thing I would like to try and mov fairly quickly and will try and come back with a detailed engineer's esti- mate and plans within 30 to 45 days because if we are going to do it this year we have got to move. Don Ashworth - If you would approve it at that point in time, as far as th amount of construction to occur, and if I am hearing what the Mayor is saying, that he would like to sit down with the developers and try and com back with a specific proposal to you. I strongly support firming that up before we get into the actual construction. Mayor Hamilton - We can do that after we receive the plans and specs. Daryl Fortier - I would like to add one more comment for Bill's attention. He may want to consider putting this last 350 feet into the contract docu- ments as an alternate for construction so.that you do not have to retake bids, for example. If the project must be scaled back it could then be bid out and the award could be accepted minus alternate #1. Councilwoman Swenson - I have a question about the resolution. The feasi- bility study that we now have was taken in 1980 and the cost of the entire project was approximately $917,000, obviously those figures couldn't hold much water today. Bill Monk - The ones that would go along with this project have been updated to $160,000 as you see in the report. Councilwoman Swenson - In the resolution in the fourth paragraph where we fixed the date for a public hearing ordering public improvements and pre- parations I just need a clarification this, "according to the plat on file with the construction of West 77th Street, a service road, and West 184th Avenue and construction of sanitary sewer etc, etc, and yet over on the following page I see here that we are accepting these improvements in tota and yet on the t.op of the next page we are ordering the improvements for this particular 187th Avenue to the 647 feet, which I assume is to the cul de -sac, is that correct. My question is, by this resolution are we con- curring that the entire project is going to go through? Bill Monk - The Council may wish to move, in the fourth paragraph, whereas a resolution of the City Council accepted basically the feasibility study that was indeed feasible to proceed with the project as shown but by this motion you are ordering the improvements only over to 184th Avenue. Council Meeting May 16, '983 -6- Councilwoman Swenson - We are in effect accepting the feasibility of 1980. How is that going to bind us to a feasibility study of 1983? Bill Monk - This is not really a feasibility study. This is just a report based on that feasibility study. The feasibility remains unchanged. It was just an updating of some of the costs included in this report. Councilman Geving moved to close the public hearing. Motion seconded by Councilwoman Watson. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. PARK ONE IMPROVEMENTS: RESOLUTION #83-26: Councilman Horn moved the adoption of a resolution ordering public improvements and preparations of plans for Park One. Resolution seconded by Councilwoman Watson. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. MINUTES: Add the following sentence under CITY ATTORNEY in the May 2, 1983, Council minutes: Councilwoman Watson voted no because she would prefer to see more than one bid if the Council is doing this on a cost basis. Mayor Hamilton moved to approve the May 2, 1983, Council minutes as amended. Motion seconded by Councilman Geving. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. Mayor Hamilton moved to note the May 3, 1983, Park and Recreation Commission minutes. Motion seconded by Councilwoman Watson. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, CARVER BEACH ESTATES: Councilman Geving moved to table action to June 6, 1983. Motion seconded by Councilwoman Swenson. The following voted.in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No,negative votes. Motion carried. BILLS: Councilwoman Swenson moved to approve the bills as presented: checks #14520 through #14586 in the amount of $192,376.44 and checks #18883 through #18960 in the amount of $1,853,375.18. Motion seconded by Mayor Hamilton. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. STREET FRONTAGE VARIANCE REQUEST, TRACT B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY 29: Steven Emmings is seeking approval to construct a home at 635J GrGreenbriar. The property does not front on a public street and access would be via a easement across Tract C. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals recommended approval of the variance as requested. Councilwoman Swenson moved to accept the Board of Adjustments and Appeals recommendation and permit the building permit with street frontage variance request for Tract B, Registered Land Survey 29, Steven Emmings. Motion seconded by Councilman Horn. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. a to brown a East Frontage Road of 1-35 19740 Kenrick Avenue =cris Irm Lakeville, MN 55044 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER N° 16308 Cherokee State Bank Saint Paul, Minnesota 22-58 960 FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND N01100 ------------ -------------------------------- PA►Y- — -- - - --OLL.ARS ORDERHE of The Press, Inc, _ DATE January 26.1981 .% 500.00 Press Building 1120 LP3308110 1:096000S801: 041"769...C3' SCHOELL & M ADSON, INC. 13 515 ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH HOPES. MINN. 55343 75-161 Zan 26, 19 81 910 PITAYO THE THE PRESS INC. ORDER OF - $200 _ O0 K. PROTECTED DOLLARS SCHOELL & MADSON, rNC. NORTHWESTERN BANKWESTcos` Hopkins. Minnesota 55343 - - - - 1 i ®1:09 L00 L6 L01: 861"0 5"i 7 3 311' � 0 m c' =r f o -- m a=� o o at a. - n C W n aO ate.. ? � l° CD . ID 10 wow a0-1 �. CD -- ar • • M G F+• w ct a b' 0 Fj- O 0 H M til 000.OMOct"p'O(DO towcDamrtmman (Do 0mrt;0"wo an ar•►i 1 a?"& 0)mm (DD 0 x 0 " Irt 0 En :3 N~'o ~'w A �rnm rt (�mm cn0_q(D �► Em m ro tO tO IV tD a 0 ct " a rt O z 'a. �M Al n (D to �►< ct m mnxaw �t3 mmaortm x0$1v b'tYm%Q0MfDF+•MmM WW O 1-ct Ea to ct0 a � c(DD Ot - (D a O 1 i 0 m to h 1m