The URL can be used to link to this page

78-05 - Park One PUD pt 1CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 May 24, 1988 Prudential Insurance of America 3530 Multifoods Tower 33 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Title Insurance Company of Minnesota 400 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re: The Press, Inc. 18780 West 78th Chanhassen, MN Lot 1, Block 1, Gentlemen: Street 55317 Park One Second Addition The above described property is zoned IOP, Industrial Office Park, and the present use thereof is a permitted use under the applicable zoning rules and regulations of the City of Chanhassen; and the parking requirements established by the City for that use and location have been satisfied. .Lot 2, Block 1, Park One Second Addition, is also zoned IOP, Industrial Office Park. Should you need further information, please feel free to contact me. S i_j3,cere}ryl-, Barbara Dacy City Planner CITY F CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 September 21, 1982 Messrs. Frank Beddor and Jerome Carlson Instant Web, Inc. 571 West 78th Street Chanhassen, My 55317 Dear Frank and Jerome: I have been informed that the escrow accounts for Park One and Park Two currently have respective deficits of $13.20 and $313.50. Although it appears that there are no further pending platting con- siderations on each of these parcels, there is the possibility that there are some remaining development contract matters which may need to be reviewed by the City Attorney's office. As such, we are asking that you deliver payment to the City_Treasurer's office in an amount to balance the account deficits plus a $250 reserve for each account so that incidental development contract matters may be taken care of as they arise. In the opinion of staff, once the development contract matters for Park One and Park Two have been completed, the accounts can be closed and any balances remaining will be remitted back to you. If you have any comments or questions on the above, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bob Waibel City Planner BW:k cc: Scott A. Martin, Community Development Director Bill Monk, City Engineer Kay Klingelhutz, Treasurer PETITION FOR CREATIC!N OF AN. ECONOMIC DEVELOP'T''IENT PROJECT AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT FOR PARK ONE REPIAT The undersigned, Frank Beddor, Jr.. and Jerome Carlson, the equitable 0-,,,7ners of Outlots A and B, Park One, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Citv Counr:il of the City of Chanhassen to establish a Municipal Develc;Fnlr-nt PrOje•ct p.lr .<ant t0 i."inneSCita statute for Said pram; r 3S , and Create a tom'!' financinq district for said area for the maximum time authorized by laver for the Ali r-- pose of paying the costs of `)ario'us public improvements, Stich as severer anc, :-,•'c':<'? service extensions _ str>_.�_� and of -per services The undersigna.d have seen to the preparation of pre limin a-ry i'--_-s_.iJ]iy ?^- nina and enc;i:e,:�erinci s`:ldies relatinc to the Teplattiric of Out.)ts A and -S of s yid nark One for i1-1c in plrep ar-11nG u;,."I: —cnt wla^_g nec'essaT ' --':;jr t1he-etitioneE 2 .::[ project and ciivtrict The undersigned believe su011. a project and district t'•l ll ena-bie t,hiem to opE a project for industrial use with Treater enercy conserliat.Lon pDtential anJ' C`fs'.;: enhanced esthetic characteristic`, as v,,ell as provide for Increased employmi,2nt and ar. en-!anced to}: ease for the City cf Chanhassen,l'l 'env ,Cla Dated this Strl day of Tana, I98n. FZSpt:ctfully° ci 1 1"T-n isi Jerome Carlson Ierome Carlson `s/ Frank Beddor, 'r. Frank Beddor, Jr, MUNICIPAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Pursuant to changes in state law in the last several sessions of the legislature, a City may establish a municipal development district and finance various public improvements thereof through the use of the increment financing. Tax increment financing is currently proposed to finance improvements to be made in the redevelopment of the central business district by the HRA. While this is one of the ways such financing can be used, its use in municipal development districts is also authorized. Such districts are established and designated by a city council and do not involve the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (although a council could, perhaps, use that vehicle). A council has to find that the creation of such a district and the use of tax increment financing to finance various public improvements within the economic development district is in the public interest because: 1) it will discourage commerce, industry or manufacturing from moving their operations to another state, or 2) it will result in increased employment in the municipality, or 3) it will result in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of this municipality. These districts can be established after a hearing held by the council and after notification of other taxing authorities for their comments. A separate increment district is established and the tax increments are thereafter used to pay any bonds and costs incurred in putting in improvements. A plan for what improvements, estimated costs, and for repayment must be prepared for the hearing and before the district is established. The duration of such districts is not longer than 10 years from the date of approval of the plan, or 8 years of tax increment, whichever is less, in contrast to redevelopment plans such as the HRA central business district redevelopment which can extend for 25 years. Bond counsel agree that a city can establish a district for any development. We of Park One are requesting the establishment,of such an economic development district using the increment financing to reduce the cost of municipal utilities in order to enhance the overall development of Park One and allow us to carry out some energy saving designs and preserve much of the wooded and contour characteristics of the site. -2- JULIUS C. SMITH Attorney at Law 215 YORKTOWN OFFICE COURT 7101 YORK AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55435 (612) 831-8530 June 4, 1980 Mr. Don Ashworth City Administrator City of Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Park One Dear Don, As a result of our meeting at Instant Web on May 23 attended by yourself, Russ Larson, Walt Hobbs , Jerome Carlson, Frank Beddor and myself, I am preparing a presentation to be made to the City Council at its meeting on June 16 concerning the establishment of an economic development district for Park One for the purpose of employing tax increment financing to reduce utility and other development costs. As stated in my letter of May 21 to Mr. Larson (copy attached) , such districts need not involve the HRA or interfere in any way with its redevelopment project. On June 9 I will submit to you a brief description of the Park One project, a short description of an economic development district and how they function., and some exhibits which we would request you distribute to the Council along with the agenda for the June 16th meeting. Also, a petition to create a municipal economic development district and a tax increment finance district will be presented . At the request of Mr. Beddor and Mr. Carlson, I have requested the con- sideration by the Planning Commission of the Park One replat project (No. 79-15) be postponed until after the Council meeting of June 16. I attach a copy of that letter. We have received the cost estimate report from Scholl and Madson, Inc. relating to utilities and streets for Park One, a copy of which I am en- closing in the unlikely event you had not as yet received a copy. As indicated in my letter to Russ Larson, we are prepared to work up a method to eliminate any risk to the City in the event of increment fi- nancing shortfalls, and I believe, Don, that these kinds of programs can be creatively negotiated to the advantage of all parties concerned so as to lessen any adverse impact which may result from relocation necessitated by other worthwhile city projects. June 4, 1980 Mr. Don Ashworth Re: Park One Page Two If you feel any other information we have relating to Park One would be helpful, if submitted to the Council with the agenda, let me know and I will get it to you immediately. Thanks. Yours very truly, ius G . mith cc: Frank Beddor, Jr. Jerome Carlson Russell Larson JCS/md JULIUS C. SMITH Attorney at Law 215 YORKTOWN OFFICE COURT 7101 YORK AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55435 (612) 831-8530 May 21, 1980 Mr. Russell Larson Larson and Mertz 1900 First National Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Re: Park One Dear Mr. Larson: This letter is in response to your request made during our meeting at your office on May 14 -concerning, primarily, Instant Web, Inc./HRA matters and general questions concerning the development of Park One in Chanhassen. The purchasers of Outlots A and B of Park One, Frank Beddor and Jerome Carlson, have submitted a preliminary sketch plan for the further subdivision of Outlots A and B (being all of the plat of Park One except Lot I, Block 1 , upon which The Press, Inc. is located) and for the extension of municipal utilities and roads into the area. They have requested the City of Chanhassen consider the feasibility of creating a Municipal Economic Development District using tax increment to aid in the installation of necessary streets and utilities. Minnesota Statutes Chapters 472A.01 et seq, and 273.71 et seq. (Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act) authorized the City to create an economic development district and to use tax increment financing therefrom to retire bonds issued by the City to pay for construction of improvements within the district. The City Council would be required to make findings that the project is in the public interest because 1) it would discourage industry moving to another state, or, 2) it would result in increased employment in the city, or, 3) it would result in preservation or enhancement of the tax base of the city. The installation of utilities and roads would cost substantially more than the incremental tax derived from the increase in the value of land only, but it would seem appropriate guarantees could be arranged to cover any possible shortfall should the district not May 'L.1 , 1980 Mr. Russell Larson Be: Park One Page Two develope fast enough to insure adequate incremental taxes during the possible eight year life of the district. Such a guarantee could take many forms or a combination of several. The necessary plan preparation, notices, meetings and hearing required by statute would delay the project somewhat, but such delay would not cause undue forseeable problems now that it is planned to put Instant Web into Park Two (the Schmieg property) . The time period involving action by the City is relatively short once the plans (including the financing plan) are completed. The physical plans and feasibility studies would have to be done in any case. It appears , Russ , our general agreement last Wednesday to the effect that this matter of economic development districts does not represent a legal problem, but more of a political one - that is, political in the sense that the City Council must determine whether it wishes to proceed in this matter - is correct. While the pre -amble contained in Section 972A.01 referring to areas "already built up" has been raised as an indirect limitation of Sec- tion 273.73 Subd. 12, the general view of bond attorneys, parti- cularly in view of the court opinions involving City Council deter- minations , is that tax increment financing of an economic develop- ment project could legally be available to a project such as Park One. Because the HRA need not be used, no findings of blight and deterioration need be made, and the creation of an economic development district need in no way interfere with the financing and management of the present HRA redevelopment district. If the City Council would like to see a more detailed procedural schedule - which could be put together quite easily - I would be happy to submit one for your perusal. After you have had a chance to review this, give_jme a cbll. Thanks. Yo very tru15 ius C . Smith cc: Mr. Jerome Carlson Mr. Frank Beddor, Jr. JCS/nw 'NILLIAM D SCHOEL� CARLISLE MAOSON JACK T VOSLER JwMES R OAR HAROLD E DAHLIN LARRYL HANSON JACK E GILL RODNEYB GORDON THEODORE D KEMNA JOHN W EMONO KENNETHE ADOLF WILLIAM R ENGELHARDT BRUCE C SUNDING R SCOTT HARRI .DENNIS W SAARI GERALD L BACKMAN SCHOSLL & MAOSON, INr-. ENGINEERS ANO SURVEYORS :6121 938-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS- MINNESOTA 55343 OFFICES AT HURON. SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON. TEXAS May 23, 1980 Korsunsky Krank Erickson Architects, Inc. 555 Shelard Tower 600 South County Road 18 14AY 27 1980 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426 Subject: Park One Dear Mr. Fortier: Pursuant to your authorization, we herein transmit cost data for streets and utilities in Park One. The attached maps best describe locations of the proposed improvements. We have only included cost totals, however, the detailed breakdowns are available should you want them. Note that two alternatives have been presented for the sanitary sewer. These costs are for construction only. Obviously the cost.information presented is rough in that topographic, soils, and field investiga- tions were not done. Following is the cost summary: Item Estimated Construction Cost Sanitary Sewer Alternate A $ 142,438 Alternate B 134,096 Watermain 93,292 Streets 191,315 Lowest Total $ 418,703 Please advise as to questions. Total cost of our services is $348.00. Attached is our invoice for this amount. Very truly yours, SCHOELL & MADISON, INC. JROrr:mkr enclosure .-- - -z - Pp' P ALL GRAVITY SEWER SHALL BE 87PIPE ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE 10' PIPE 4" DIP FORCEMAIr IliLIFT STATION CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLE CONNECT TO EXISTING -TEE U SCALE. I= 200 W iF } (1 u f z w it NI 0 LEGEND ml [ �- GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER SANITASY SEWS NI Q u 9ND.�1IATERMA FORCEMAIN ' H w —� WATERMAIN !►LT_,A— ` I _ 1 S TAIT E HWY NO. 5 I � I SCHOELL AND MADSON INC. t LL I0 .' .• � .00000"'.... ill F \G Q S Q PJ� A \GAGO . e h TYPICAL STREET 28-0" -BACK OF CURB TO BACK OF CURB 4v mlim 1 ; z Wr V) N S Z Q i 2 U STREET A l `_CONNECT TO EX STING PAVEMENT AT THIS �I POINT. ; I tL I O I I 1 6 I � t I 1 t. t I - I STATE HWY NO. 5 SCHOELL AND M ADSON INC. i SCALE 1"= 200' W _F Q cr O a z w a F w w w a LL �- O In } F- V STREET PAVING Q PG\ Q PJ� v ALL W,QTERMAIN SHALL BE 10 PIPE ALL GRAVITY SEWER SHALL BE 8" PIPE ALL FORCEMAIN SHALL BE 4 " PIPE LIFT J STATION �. ts: SCALE 1":200 t 1 z w N N Q 4l z Q CL Q S u ir a _ z Li co 4e l LL 0 — CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLE } --CONNECT TO EXI TING TEE o r- �T v T z za 3 O\)"Vi . 2 Iz- LEGEND t SANITARY SEW N = a-�--- GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER " AND WATERMA Ji I "' FORCEMAIN WATERMA N ALT— B f ST E HWY N0 5 � 1 L--------_-----------r----------------- ----_------- crunr� I I A Mn M AnSO N INC. RUSSELL. H. LARSON CRAIG M. MERTZ OF COUNSEL HARVEY E. SKAAR MARK C. MCCULLOUGH LARSOX & MERTZ ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1900 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 Donald W. Ashworth Chanhassen City Manager Box 147 Chanhassen. MN 55317 Dear Don, July 31, 1980 t Re: Proposed Tax Increment District for Park One TELEPHONE (612) 335-95E5 You have asked us to comment on the petition of Messrs. Carlson and Beddor for the designation of Park One as a Municipal Develop- ment District under Chapter 472A of Minnesota Statutes. This petition has been made in conjunction with a similar petition for the installation of municipal services as a public improvement project. Under the Carlson/Beddor proposal, the Park One public improvements would be installed by the City, and the costs of such installation would be recovered in the form of -tax increments rattier than in the form of special assessments. This of course presumes that private construction would subsequently occur within Park One so as to create these increments. The petitoners' attorney has indicated that the petitioners would he willing to negotiate some sort of guarantee contract, which wound cover any possible shortfalls should the district not develope fast enough. Proposal Contrasted With HRA Downtown Project A Chapter 472A district would be a tax increment district similar to the Chanhassen HRA's downtown project. There would be several differences however: 1. The Citv Council, rather than the HRA, would be responsible for the operation of the district. 2. The district is not required to be "Blighted". 3. The district must promote the improvement of the tax base in areas "alreadv built up 4. The -district would be subject to all of the provisions of the 1979 legislation which establishes many new limitations on the use of tax increment financing. Donald W. Ashworth July 31, 19sb Page Two Items 3 and 4 above require further comment. Chapter 472A was first enacted in 1974 for the purpose of enabling the City of Minneapolis to utilize tax increment financing to expand the skyway system and to construct City -owned parking facilities. The now act permits any municipality (defined as "any city"), to construct skyways, parking ramps, "open -space relief", and "developments aimed at improving the physical facilities, quality of life and quality of transportation", in areas of a municipality which are "already built-up".- The quoted language has been cited by cities other than Minneapolis for the constru- ction of all manner of public improvements as Chapter 472A tax increment projects. Is the Subject Property "Already Built -Up"? The threshold legal question is:"Does Park One consti.tue an area "already built-up?" The statute and the reported cases thereunder offer no guidance as to the meaning of this term. If this term was intended to signify only intensively developed areas such as the Minneapolis loop, then the Park One site would not seem to quality as a Chapter 472A project. It can be argued, however, that the following factors quality Park One as a "built-up area": 1. availability of full municipal services at the property line, 2. frontage on a trunk highway, 3. frontage on a commercial -type service road, 4. frontage on a railroad right-of-way, 5. partial occupation of the site by The Press and Reply Systems, and 6. the ongoing development of the neighboring Lyman Lumber site. The construction of the Park One public improvements as a Chapter 4.72A project would require the issuance of municipal bonds. Such bonds would have to be supported by a favorable opinion letter of Chanhassen's bond counsel, who would.not only review the City's procedural transcript but also make an independent judgment as to the validity of any City Council finding that Park One is an area "already built-up". Mr. Kennedy, the City's bond counsel, is temporarily absent from the area and,thus, unavailable.for comment on this specific petition. 'One -of the senior partners in Mr. Kennedy's firm, while_expressing skepticism regarding the project, requested that the matter be submitted to Mr. Kennedy upon his return, as he is the person most familiar with the current interpretation prevelant among bond counsel as a group. y Tel i i7 A- Donald W. Ashworth July 31, 1980 Page Three 2 1979 Reform Legislation In 1979 the State Legislature enacted a comprehehs-ive -taxx increment statute (Chapter 273) which was intended to override certain provi- sions of all of the various tax increment laws which have been enacted over the years, including the tax increment law under which HRA's function and Chapter 472A, which is the subject of the Carlson/Beddor petition. Tax increment districts formed prior. to August of 1979,. such as the Chanhassen HRA downtown project, are exempt from almost all of the provisions of Chapter 273. A Park One tax increment district would, however, be subject to all of the provisions of Chapter 273.. The relevant provisions. of Chapter 273 deal with the following topics:. 1. fiscal disparities, 2.. formalized 'procedures for project initiation, 3. preparation of a financing plan, 4. intergovernmental consultation, 5. durational limitations, 6. annual reporting requirements, and 7. administrative expense limitations. Fiscal Disparities The proposed Park One tax increment district would be subject to the provisions of the fiscal disparities law. Any increases in assessed valuation occurring in Park One would be subject to a 40% contribution rate into the metropolitan pool. Procedurefor District Formation The procedure for establishment of a Chapter 472A district is summarized as follows: 1. preparation of tax increment financing plan, 2. submission of plan to the planning commission, 3. submission of plan to county -board and school board, 4. public hearing, 5. adoption of city council resolution approving plan, 6. filing of plan with state, and 7. certification of the district to the county_. The Plan Document The Tax Increment Financing Plan is a formal document prepared either by a fiscal consultant or in-house by City employees. The . y k Donald W. Ashworth July 31, 1980 Page Four plan must contain: 1. estimated construction costs, 2. estimated administration costs, 3. the amount of bonded debt to be incurred, 4. a description of the revenue sources to be used to pay project costs, 5. the current assessed value of the district, 6, the estimated assessed value of the district upon project completion, 7. estimated duration of the district, and 8. estimated tax.impact on other affected taxing jurisdictions (i.e., Hennepin County and Eden Prairie Schools and the watershed district). (See MSA 273.74, Subd.l) Upon completion of the plan document, it is transmitted to the planning commission for its comment and recommendation (See MSA 472A.03). The planning commission recommendation should be in writing and should .be received by the City Council prior to the public hearing stage described below. .Simultaneous with submission to the planning commission, the plan must be submitted to the County Board and the School Board for their comment. - A public hearing on the plan must be held by the City Council. The School Board and the County Board must be given time at that hearing to present their views on the plan. Notice of the public hearing must be given by publication (See MSA 273.74,Subd.3 and MSA 472A.03). Upon conclusion of the public hearing, a formal resolution must be adopted by the City Council containing findings as follows: 1. that the district will discourage commerce from moving from Minnesota, 2. that the district will increase employment -in Chanhassen, 3. that the district will enhance Chanhassen`.s tax base, 4. that the development would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future,.. 5. that the plan conforms to the general plan for the development of Chanhassen as a whole, 6. that :the plan affords maximum opportunity for development of the district by private enterprise. (See MSA 273.73 Subd. 12 and 273.74..Subd.3). • .I Donald W. Ashworth July 31, 1980 Page Five The fourth finding represents the very essence of tax increment financing. Tax increment financing is said to have no significant. impact on other taxing jurisdictions because it simply uses the tax dollars it generates to pay the cost of generating them. However, if private development would occur without public intervention, the whole theory falls and other taxing jurisdictions are in fact being deprived of tax dollars they otherwise would receive. Durational Limitations Chapter 273 imposes several limitations on the maximum duration or life of a tax increment district: a) the district collapses if no bonds are issued or if no improvements are constructed within three years of the creation of this district..(See MSA 273.75 Subd. 1). b) the district collapses after eight years from the date of receipt of the. first tax increment, c) the district collapses 10 years after city council approval of the tax increment financing plan (See MSA 273.75 Subd.1) d) individual parcels fall out of the district if at the end of five years, no site preparation has taken place on that parcel. (Street construction adjacent to a. parcel qualifies as site preparation, thus,. care .would have ..to be taken that ..all lots to be created by Carlson/Beddor front on the City's street construction activities). (See MSA 273.75 Subd. 6) . .. The eight year limitation in troublesome, as the receipt of to 2--1/2 years after creation date on which the district was Annual Reporting All tax increment districts an annual status report to the State Planning Agency. "b" above could be-the.most r the first increment could be up of the district, depending on the first certified to the County Auditor. created after August 1, 1979 must submit - the County. Board, the School Board. and The report must contain -.- Donald W. Ashworth July 31, 1980 Page Six k a) an accounting for revenue received by the district, b) an accounting for expenditures made, c) the amount of increased assessed valuation within the district, and other similar information. A summary version of this report must be published annually. (See MSA 273.74 Subd. 5). Administrative Expenses Chapter 273 places a 5% ceiling on in-house administrative costs charged to the district. The costs of administrative duties delegated to outside consultants are not subject to.this limitation. (See MSA 273.75 Subd.3). Conclusion If the Council approves the.Carlson/Beddor petition in concept, it is recommended that, estimates be obtained for the cost of preparation of a tax increment financing plan and that negotiations be commenced with the petitioners.tor a private guarantee of City costs incurred in preparation of that plan. Bond Counsel should also be asked to review the petition fora determination of the "already built-up" question. Very truly yours, CRAIG M. MERTZ Assistant Chanhassen City Attorney ter; 'Zy 4` KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS, INC. June 11, 1980 The Mayor and City Council City of Chanhassen 7610 Laredo Dr. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Park One Comm. No. 79-15 Honorable Mayor and Council Members: ARCHITECTS / PLANNERS / INTERIOR DESIC�V Park One consists of approximately forty acres of industrial zoned land on the easternmost edge of Chanhassen_ along Highway 5. With the exception of The Press, Inc., the land is undeveloped. There is public road and utilities just to the North of The Press, and this frontage road dedication continues to the Eden Prairie line. This frontage road divides Park One approximately in half. The South half is relatively flat, agricultural land and is fully visable from Highway 5. This area is readily developable. The North half is heavily wooded and presents considerable topographic relief (up to 60 feet). It is also divided by a natural hollow which provides drainage for a sizeable area. To develop a typical industrial park on this site would be difficult and ecologically undesirable. Vast quantities of earth would have to be moved to create a relatively flat site. Almost all trees would be removed. The drainage pattern would rely strictly on storm sewers, creating potential hazards at discharge locations. Given these constraints, it is proposed that the North half of Park One be an earthsheltered, environmentally compatible development. The key to this solution is constructing a road which works with, and not against the topography. This has been done, and the road as shown on the drawings requires only minor cutting to present a gently rolling profile. This enables us to maintain the natural drainage pattern and create a "duck pond" for excess runoff. It also maintains the natural, wooded character of the site and removes only those trees absolutely necessary to construction. The buildings will be set into the hillsides with a front "walkout" profile, creating a minimum building mass. With such earthsheltering, these buildings will also be highly energy efficient. 555 SHELARD TOWER 600 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD 18 MNNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 (612)546-5381 n ♦ a The Mayor and City Council City of Chanhassen Comm. No. 79-15 Page 2 We are excited and pleased with the belief that.Park One will be a development everyone will be proud of. Sincerely yours, KORSUNSKY UANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS, INC. c� Daryl Fortier DPF/gew C ,'�'�*" •OJu •Qea _ ,, � _o cried 18MM LM,1 g 9cp;o smut eqi spun iaeuIBu3 pZuassaJwd PaWW5ea Ainp s wa 1 istp pug uoN}AmWdns yip Aw A"wn so ew Aq pamlwd Mm tmWw so vglir yswds %Wtd SM PW 4pM AqaJey 1 suoaau It 0 Qw 1 1 11 •squauissassp pasodozd pup aiuooui 'saznq -Tpuadxa pagpuiTgsa S94POTPUT Aipununs 4sOo buTMOTTOJ aqy (Z 'MaTA go quTod BUT -zaauibua up MOJJ aTgispag azp s4ua-u9AOzduiz pasodozd aqy (T :BUTMOTTOJ aqq apnTouoo am 'uzazag paquasazd uOT-412WJOJuT aq-4 uO paspg •uiazaq pasodozd squauianozdWT aq4 buTOUPUTJ UT gsTssp oq aup xzpa zoj pasodozd osTp ST 40TzgSTp quauzazouT xpq V 'hqunoo uzdauuag UTg4TM AgT0 aq4 go uoTgaod ATae4Sp9 aqq zO9 p9gszTgp4sa aq oq pasodozd sz goTzgszp quauidOTaAap TpdTOTUnUi V ' S 'ON APmgbTg xunzy JO LRaOu pup 94Ts zagwnq upuiAq aqp go gspa pa4pOOT pazp TPTagsnpUT pup TPTozaunuoo pasodozd p sT .aup xzpa • anuaAV qq V 8 T gsaM qp S *ON LjPMgBTH xunzy uo S4uaUlaAOzduiT uOTgPZTT9uuPg0 pup UOT4PZTTPUBTS pup 'suTPua94Pm '(uOT4P4s gJTT p buTpnTOUT) szaMas AaP4Tups 'SNJOM abpuzpzp 'zaggnb pup gano ag9aouoo 'sgaazgs apnTOUT s4uaui9nozdurt asagy • aup. Nzpd o s4uauianozduri TpdTDTtnlU q4zM pauzao -uoo Apngs A4TTTgzsp99 buT.zaautbua up sT UTazaq paquasaza sN0zsn73NO3 aNV 2�UVKMS aup abpa zabpupys ,�qTo 'ggzoMgsv UOQ •aw.o/o 086T ' 8 zaguiaoaQ UOSSPqupgD Jo A4T3 'DNI •NOSOb'W '8 1130HOS azOV/Z90'L $ azoV/6SZ'6 $ aaov/£SS' L $ sazov E-Z£ 896'£bZ$ ZZ8'LT6$ V58'£L9 896'£VZ$ ZZ8'LT6$ SZT'6T£ SZ8'09 SVT'6£Z T68' LT`[ 9£8'08T$ agTS aaquma upmu a 94TS ssaid agy SZNHWSSaSSV gVIO1 ag9V' VdW00 agpH quauissassv Paav quauissassv -4unouiv SZN3WSsas8v Q3sOd0ud zvsos spaaooad quawaJoui xPy squawssassv TPzoadS SNOIJ,VD0rIrIV ZSOo GaSOd0Ud zvsOs sTPuBTS puP u0i4PzzT9uuPg3 S -ON APmgBTH xunsy sxjoM abPUTPIG s4aaz4s saT4TTT3Pa uTP'uJa4vM saT4TTTDP3 J9maS AJP4zuPS SZNSWaA0UdWI SNO XUVd UOa 71X wwos ssoo saunliGN3dxa oMs abed a abPupw AgTo 'ggzomgsv uoQ •JW o/o 086T '8 3a quJ9DGC uasspguPgo jo �qTo •DNI'NOSOb'W '8 -T-IFC640S •anuanV g4�8T gsaM og gueoplpe pup go gspa spaap oq aoTnaas aaMas AXPJOdivag PUP 901AJOS a94PM apTnO.zd og UassPquPgD aog aTgTssod sT qT 'aaTsap os aTaTPaa uapS JO A4TO auq PTnogS •squaw -anoaduiT S 'ON KvMgBTH Nunay pup anu9AV g4t8T Jo buTaPgs gs.00 aTagq Naas og j;Pgs aTaTpaa uapS ggTM anbOTPTp aagganj puawwooaa am • gaA euou pawnsse aneq aM ' aTaTPaa uapg go AgTD aqg woaj uoTgpdTotgapd gsoo go swaag uI • sapaA ggbTO gnogp IITuo sT aJTT anTgoaJJa s,goTagsTp aqs •sTPubTs butoUPUTJ aoj SUPOW ATuo/gsaq aqg sapTnoad 4DTa4sTp guaUiaaouT xPg aug gnq sapaA Maj P aoi PeAPTap aq pTnoo UOTgPZTTPUbTS *UOTgPZTT:PubTs snTd 'OTjjpaq S -ON APMgbrg Xunay punoggspa aoj sspdAq pup auPT uang gjaT P pasodoad osTP anPq GM suosPaa AgaJPS aOa •guasaad gp soup-[uoTgPaaTaooP pue UOTgpaPTaoap punoggsaM apnTOUT og anuanv gq�BT gP S • oN FPMg5TH Xunas oq sguauianoadwT wnwTuTui pagpo (S -TAUT sPq JgPgs UOTgpgaodsuPas go guaupapdaa P40SGUUTW •„V gaaagS„ uo saTgTTTgn PUP sgaaags pup P '„v gaaagS„ og anuOAV LRL8T gsaM uroa; gaaagS ggLL gsaM uo saTgTTTgn pup sgaaags TTP Jo gsoo aqg squesaadaa aup Napd og passassp ,�TTPToads aq og pasodoad gunoUre 896'CtZ$ aqs (8 aaags abpa aabPUPW �4TD 'ggaoMgsV UOG •aW o/o 086T '8 aaglU90.aQ uassPquPgD ;o �4TD 'ONI *NOSOVV-E '8 'I1aaHOS 'aaxneMTTW 'obPOTgO aqq 'ggnos agq uo S -ON APMgbTg NunaL 'gsaM aqq uo agTs .zagwnq uPuu�q aqq Aq papunoq ST gI -goTagsTp queuidoTanap aqq go aauaoo gsPagq.zou aqq uT pagPOOT ST goT.zgsTp quauiazOuT xPq sTgL -(Z -ON gOTIgSTQ uassPguPgD) pasodoid ST g0TagSTQ buTOUPUT3 quauiaaoul xPW P goT.zgsTp quawdOTanap agq uTggTM -VZLV a9gdeg0 'agngPgS PgosauuTW gq.TM aouepJooOP UT pagstTgpgsa buTaq sT goTagsTp sTgy •Aquno0 uTdauuag UT buTAT A-4To agg.90 uOTq.zod A_1-Tagsea agg -TOJ pagsTTgPqsa aq oq pasodoad sT goTIgSTp quawdOTanap TPdToTunui V •anU@AV g4V8T gP S -ON AEMgbTg NunJL uo squeuianoaduiz UOTgezTTauuPgD PUP UOTgeZTTPubTs pule 'aaggnb PUP q.zno '1 aga.IOuoO ggTM Sgaa.zgs 'sXaOM abPUTPap 'uoTsuagxa uTpwaagpm ' (UoTgegs g;TT P ggTM) aem@s LaPgTuPs apnTOUT squauianoaduiz asagl •aUO NJPd ao; pasodozd sguauianoadiuT TPdTOTtznui ggTM buTTPap �pngs K4 TTTgTSPa; 1 ano gTuigns uTa.zaq am 'UOTgPZT.zoggnP TTounoO oq quensand SZNSWWOj 2�hOIDOGOUINI : uau:aTquaO 4ngS A4TTTgTSPa3 squauiaAOaduil auO XlPd :goaCgnS LTESS PgosauuTW 'uassPguPgO LVT xoS 'O 'd .z95PUPY1 ,�4TO ' g4JOMLISV uoa * JW o/O uassPguPLO JO AgTO 086T 18 zaquiaoaa EbESS VIOS3NNIW 'SNDId0H • HinOS 3nN3AV H1NIN 09 • 609L-GE: stOABAdns ONt7 SUSaNISNS 'ONI 'NOSOVVY"S 11aOHOS NVWr3V9 '1 01VH30 IHHVH 11005 'H 10HVHl3SN3 'H WVIl11M 3100V '3 H13NN3H ❑NOW3 'M NHOf VNW3>I '0 380003H1 1lis '3 HOVf NOSNVH 'l AHHVI NI-IHVO '3 0108VH HHO 'H S3WVf 83lSOA '1 )IOVf NOSOVA 31SI1HV3 1130H3S 'O WVI111M P go gszsuoo paaP auq buioznaas sgaaags buigsTxs •sguautanoadWT gaaags pasodoad sagpoiput qsaq T-ZOOTT -ON buTMPJG pauoPggV ssaaxss •xaoM ano aog sispq auq spM gno,IPT pasodoad s,aadOTanap aus •aauuPTd si.0 pup iadOTanap auy (t, •buTuupTd asn puPT azaug go sngpgs guaaano pup 'S 'ON ,�PMgBTH xunay/anuaAV ugV81 go buzaPus qsoo 'aoznaas IgtTTgn 90 abuPuoxa ssnoszp oq JJPgs azaTpad uaps go '�qTO (£ •uozgoasaagut anuanV ggt8T gsaM - S 'ON APMubzH xunas au-4 aoj sguauiaaznbaa azauq auzuiaagap og aapao uT ;jpgs S -ON goTagsTQ ZOGUN (Z •AauaoggP pup aabpuPw Agio buzpnTouT JJPgs A4T3 (T :bUTMOTT09 aug g4TM suozssnOsip pTau anpu GM 'gaodaa sTuq Jo uoTssTuigns oq aOTad -6Zb -ON aagdpuO 'agngpgs agpgs Aq PauTjap sP goaCoad guauianoadwT TPdiozunw P aoi sgsoo Jo guauissassP aug ugiM buiTPap ssaooad auq uT dags Axessaoau P sT Apngs sTgl •quauidOTanap sTgq aog paaznbaa squauianoadtuz TpdTDTunui go ,ipngs A4TTTgzspaJ buzaaauzbua up apznoad oq sT gaodaa slug go asodand aqy Q •PaaP auo Napd auq go aauaoo gsaMggnos auq Q uT pagpOOT ATquaaano aaP •ouI 'suiagsAS �Tdag pup •ouI 'ssaad aqy •gozagstp quauiaaouz xpq auq sp pagiaosap anogp Paap aqg go quaw -dOTanap TPTagsnpuz-TPioaaunuoo aaop £-Z8 pasodoad p sz auo X-Tud •gspa auq uo anuanV ugV81 gsaM Pup 'ugaou auq uo SNOPag DTJTDPd pup Tnpd ''4S 086T 18 aaquraoaa oMy abpd aabpupw AgT3 'ugaoMusv uoQ •aye o/o uassPuuPuo go IgT3 'ONI'NOSOVVY '8 1190HOS ' :anuaAV ggV81 ggTM uOTgoasaaguT S -ON APMgbTg xunay aug gp SquauianoadwT AuP osTP pus 'anuaAV ggV8T oq sa4PTaa sp sanssT buTMOTTOJ agg uo.aaa5u oq gduiaggs pus anbOTPTp aTagg onuTquoo saTgTununuoo oMq agg To SJJPgs agg gsuq Tpsodoad Ono sT gI •uasssquPgD uTggTM ATTOgm aq oq quauiubTTP agg 4JTus og aTgsaaTsap aq APui qI • aTaTPaa UOPa pus uasspgusgD 3o aapaoq uounuoo auq uo paaaguao aq oq anuaAV ggV8T s.agsoTpuT T-Z00TT -ON buTMPaQ •pPOa apTM g009-8Z agg uPgq aaoui paau you saop uaSSPgUPgD 90 AgTD agg 'ggpTM gaaags 30 suiaag uI •uoTgsanb uT snug sT anuaAV ggf,gT _40 LIOTgPOTJTsSPTO agPuiTgln agy •sxoPaq agg go ggaou PGaP TPTquapTsaa agg uo gopdWT agq gnoqu uoTgenaasaa auIOS spg aTaTPad uapg 'puPgsaapun ATguaaano am sv •uiagsAs UOTgpgjod -Supag aTagg uT gaaags aOgoaTTOD P aq PZnoM sTgy -sxoPag OTJTOPa PUP 'TnPd •qs 'aaxnpMTTw 'ObPOTgD agq ssoaoP ggaou papuaqxa aq oq anuanv ugVgT uMogs gspd aqq uT SPq aTaTPaa uaPa 90 AgTD aqy -anuaAV ggb8T sT g4PTM gOOJ-8Z aqg og UOTgdaoxa aTgTssod aqy •guauIaaTnbaa aouPuTpao AgTO aqq sT sTgy •aaggnb pup gano agaaouoo ggTM uOTgoas panpd snouTuingTq apTM 4009-8Z P aq oq pasodoad aap sgaaags TT`d •sxopaq OTJToPd pup 'Tnpa •qs 'aaxnPMTTN 'ObPOTgD aqg oq S -ON APmgbTH xunay uroaj anuaAV ggV8T PUP 'anuaAV ggVgT og ga.aagS ggLL gsaM tuoa3 „V gaaagS„ 'anuaAV ggDi8T og anuaAV ugL8T iuoa9 gaaagS g4LL gsaM apnTouT uTaaaq pasodoad squauianoaduiT gaaagg •gaaagS ggLL gsai%l og ggaou gaaj 005 ATagpwTxoaddP guTod p oq pPOa aOTnaas agg uioaj sgsTxa anuanV.ggL8T -anuaAV ggL81 og gspa anuaAV PgOxPQ uioa; S -OR APMOTg xunay 90 OPTS ggaou agg uo buTpuagxa ppoa abPguoaJ 086T 18 aaquiaoaQ anoa abpa aabPUPF, AgT3 'ggaoMusv UOG •aw 0/0 uasspqupgD go )�qTD �� NC7SOtlW '8 1130HOS pasodoad agg go aingPu aqg go asnPoas •uMogs sP anuanV g4t8T PUP gaaags,; uo .zaMas uiaogs apnTouT s.�{aoM abPuTP.ap pasodozd aqj, •uizogs. Aouanbeig aPa�-OOT aqg aOJ pasodoad sT guasudoTanap og anp 3jounj ejgxa aqg agPpoumi000P og abPzogs JagPM su.zogs 'ATTPuoTgTppV •uaagqPd abPuTPzp quasoad aqg agPngadaad og buTsodoid azP aM •pagsaagPM axPZ TTagagTW aqg og sab.zPgosTp osTP PUP ggnos pua gsPa sMOTJ gO@agS ggLL 30 ggnos ATTP.zauab PaaP agg JOJ abPUTuap buTgsTxs a}[P'I TTag34TW 90 ggaou ATagPTpaunu-r S -ON APMubTH xunJI Jo apTs ggaou ago uo pagPooT gs-TPuu abJPT P og sabzPgosTp 41 •gsPa aqg og sMoTJ 4aa.z4S g4LL gsaAl 90 144.zou PaaP aqg aoJ abPuTP.zp buTgsTxa aqs -T-ZOOTT *ON buTMPza uo pagPOTpuT osTa aaP s�,[aom abPuTP.zp pasodoad S)MM SOVNIVECI •ATguanbasgns passnosTp aq osTP TTTM sgsoo PUP xTpuaddP aqg UT paguasaad alP sgsoo paTTPq@G sT uTazaq pasodoad gaajgs 90 gsoo pa4PuuT4sa. TPgos, •sxoPzg aqg 90 gg.zou uoTsuagxa PUP zogoaTToo P awooaq og anuaAV g4t8T awnsaad pTnoM sTgy •eangng aqg UT sauPT sgT pTTnq pTnoo aTJTVad uaps PUP Mou sauPT oMg sgT pTTnq og uassuquPgD aTgPua pTnoo TPsodoad aaggPT sTgy Z.ligTTT0P3 auPT-inog papTnTp uPTpauu P aq APuu anuanV ggt8T- sdPgaad ao ' aangn_ aqg uT ao Mou uoTgngTJguoo goa.aTp gT aq 'anuanV g4,8T 90 sgsoo aqg uT GaPgs aTaTPad uaps TTTM MOH (E s l Zajngnj agg.uT ggaou papuagxa aq anuanV LIgp8T TTTM (Z ZuassPquPgD l UTg4TM gTTnq 4aaJ4s TPooT P aq anuaAV ggV8T PTnogS (T 086T 18 aaquuiaoac anTa abed. zabPUPyi ��T� 'ggaoMqsv uoQ *all o/o uassPguPgD 90 ,�qTD 'ONI'NOSOVVY $ "1130HOS gT ubnoggTP 'paaP-sTug oq aTgPTzPAP ATTppaa qou sT aTaTPad uapS UT aoTnaas aaMaS •aoTnaas aaMas Aapaoduaq aaTsap APtu aup xaPd go gspa ATagPTpatuuzT PaaP auq 90 auuos gpgq aTgTssod sT qI •suPTd aaMas anTsuau -aadtuoo anTgoadsaa aTauq uo Paau sTgq UT .aozn.zas aaMas Jo abuPgoxa uMogs sPu aTaTpad UGPE[ ao uassPuuPgD augTaN •passaappp aq pTnous aTJTpad uapg ugTM SaTgTTTDPJ aaMas buTaPgs 3o uotgsanb ags •aagauuPTp uouT-8 aaP saaMas AgTnpab TIV •anuanV ugt8T pup 'gaa.zgS ugLL gsaM '„K gaaagS„ uo pasodoad sT uoTgPgs 49TT auq oq tuagsAs UOT409TTOD aus •oq paaaajaa gsnC aaMas anuanV g4L81 agg oq abzpgosTp pup dtund pTnoM uoTgpgs aus •„V gaaagS„ pup gaaagS LPLL gsaM uaaMgaq APMpTUI anuanV u4V8T go abpa gspa aqq uo pasodoad sT uoTgpgs STgy •aup xaPd anaaS oq uoTgp.gs g9TT abPMas P TTpgsuT oq AiPssaoau sT qT IAudpabodoq buTgSTxa go asnpoag •anuanV 14gL8T:90 pua ggaou aqq uo pagPooT sT Janus uouT-8 buTgSTXa 'Z-ZOOTT 'ON buTMp.Ta uo pagTJOSap sp pasodoad sT aaTAJOS aaMas AapgTuPS UHMSS 2iHVlINVS 'goTagSTQ pagsjagPM Aaogpband-AaTTg agq 3o TPnoaddp aqq gaatu gsni pauuPTd sP sxaoM abpuTPap TT`d 'xTpuaddp aqq UT papTnoad sT uoTququasaad _ paTTPgap P pup 'ATquanbasgns passnosTp aq TTTM sgsOD 'SZ8'09$ oap uTaaag pasodoad sp sxaoM abpuTpap go sgsoo pa4Pug4sg •sgaaags aqq uo gaag 008-009 ATagpuiTxoaddp go sTpnaaquT gP sgaTuT abpuTPap apTnoad oq pagduuagqP anPq am 'abPaanoo aopjans pzpq go qunouup qupgTnsaa agq pup aup xapd UT quautdoTanap 086T ' 8 aaquuaDaa XTS abpa aabPuPW A4TD 'ggaoMgsV uoQ •aye o/o uassPquPgD 90 A4T3 'ONI'NOSOtfW '8 1190HOS Z-ZOOI I NOUViS ld l-I a3SOdOdd NIVVY3380A „v a3SOdO8d NIdW1131VM „Ol 03SOdOHd 83M3S A8ViINVS „8 (13SOdO8d NIdW831t1M „Ol 9NUSIX3 83M3S A�WiINdS „8 9NI1SIX3 \)"3 N ,OOZ = 3-1VOS 0861`838W3030 :3iV(l 2t,1299 dlOS3NNIW SNINdOH HinOS 3nN3AV H1NIN OS Sa0A3A8nS 18 833NION3 'ONI NOSOdW '8 'l-130HOS NIVINH31dM`83M3S k8V-LINVS 3NO NHVd HOA Aan1S A1I-l181SV3A ViOS3NNIW N3SSVHNVHO -40 AIIO d VOH 39VIN083 (9201 ) (0 099 ) •gaodaa sTgq uT a04PT passnosip gale sgsoo pup xTpuaddP aqq uT paguasaad sT uMopXpaaq paTTpgap v T68' LTT$ ST saTgzTIOP; uzPuraagpM 40 gsoo Tpgog pagPuizgsa aujy •sTspq pogTuiTT P uo eons 90 aTgleduo aq pTnoM uiags,is uassPquPgo auks •aagpm uasspqupulo ggTm anuanv ggV8T oq guaop[ple SPa.zP a-r.zzP.za uaps anaas oq anzgoajja gsoo aaoui aq APuu qz ' guauidoTanap _4o buTw-uq uo buzpuadap 'Pule aTaTPaa uapS uz aTgPTTPnP ,�TagPzpaunuz qou sT -TOTeM • aTgtssod ST lions ' aup Staled 90 gsPa iT@4PTpaunuz aTaTPad uaps oq aoznaas aagPM 90 suIaag uI •sagpa aouPansuT PUP uotgbagoad aaTj oq sagPTaa sp asn puPT pasodoad au.Ig 90 aangPu TPTagsnpuz auq og anp sT azzs utouT-OT auq gPug agoN •UOT-4PTn3az0 apznoad oq padooT aq pTnoM wagsAs augy •gaaagS ugLL gsaM Pup „V gaa.zgS„ uaamgaq anuaAV gq{,8T uo pup '„V gaaagS_, '74aaagS ugLL gsaM uo UTPuiaagPm tjouz-OT puagxa oq pasodoad sT qI •anuaaV ugLBT gsGM 90 pua ggaou au14 uo pagPaoT sT UTU U-TagPM aagauuPzp ilou-T-OT buTgSTXS • Z-ZOOTT -ON buzMPaQ pagaPggP uo uMous qsaq dap S0TgTTTDP9 uzpuraG4PM SSIZI'II �'d3 1�:I�TnRiSZFIM •ATquanbasgns passnoszp aq TTTM gsoo PUP 'xTpuaddp aqq uT dap suMopxpaaq paTTPgaa 988'08T$ ST SaT4TTT0pJ aaMas �JP4TUPS 90 sgsoo TPgog pagPuuigsg • azaTpja uapg jo uoTgaod gpgq aog wags,�s sgz uT aTgPTTPnP r-4Topdpo quaupuiaad pagxa OAPL; qou saop uasSPgUPqD 'aanaMog •sTspq Fiapaodwaq p uo aTgzssod aq Ipw abupuoxa up eons • axPq TT@gD4TW 90 gsPa LTa4PTPGwwT gszxa saop 086T ' 8 aaquiaoac ggBTS abPd aabpupys AgTo ' ggaomqsv uoQ • ay1 0/0 uassPquPgD 30 AgzD 'DNI'NOSOVVY '8 -1130HOS •pazTpaudoaC sT Agagus 'auPT uanq 49@T auq gnougTm •anUaAV ggt8T gP gjaT buTuanq punoggsaa SaTOTgan go aaquinu quaoTJTubTS P goaCoad am pup 'S .•ON APMubtH xunal jo Squauibas paads aaubiu auq 90 auo sT Paap anuaAV ugt8T gsaM aul •ATTPT4TUT pagonagsuoo aq lions gauq @ban ATbuoags am 'DTJJUaq S -ON APMgBTH Nunal punoggsua ao; sspdAq pup auPT uanq qg@T P buTpTAoad go uoTgsanb auq buTuaaouo0 •oTjjPag S -ON APMgBTH xunal punoggsaa aog ssudAq pup auaT uanq 49GT P butpzAoad sgaoddns ATG4TUTJap IOGUN 'quauiaaznbaa P aq oq qT agPozpUT you ptp A@uq ubnog4TV •@uizg snug qP sgsoo UT aaPgs oq UOTgTsod P UT qou ST JOCUw •dzgJPaq S 'ON AumubtH Nunaj, punogqsaM ao_q sauPT UOTgPa@TaooP pup uozgPaaTaoap apnTou-r pTnoM S-4U@WaAoadurr aTgPgdaoaP uinwTuTm auq 'uozgoasaaquz anuaAV ugV8T gsaM auq 90 suiaaq uI •aozjjo S -ON gozagsTQ auq go uaaa0 UPA9 PUP zgPX Taor •sass@W ugzM pTau sum buTgaaui aul •sjuTOT930 IOQuW ggTM gauz am 'uozgPdzozgapd TPTOUPUTJ Tpzquagod AuP pup squautaaTnbaa uinWTUTUi @Uzuiaagap og aapao uI •paTTPgSUT ATTPTgTUT aq oq buiob aaaM Aauq JT sP sgsoo uOTgPZTTPubTs auq paguasaad aAPq aN1 •gasuo auq qP paTTPgsuT aq pTnoM qsaq gz 'aanaMOq 'sapaA Mag P JOJ paAPTap aq pTnoo UOTgPZTTPubTS •o.JjPaq S -ON APMgBTH Nunsl punoggsaa aoj sspdAq pup auPT uanq 4JaT P PUP 'o.JPag S.•ON APMLIBTH Nunal punogqsaM aog sauPT uotgpaaTaooP pup uoTgPaaTaoap aaP UOTgonagsuoo agPzpaunui aog pasodoad •T-ZOOTT -ON buTmpaQ pauopggp Aq pagzaosap qsaq aap squaui ' -anoaduiz @Saul •og paaaagaa ATsnozAaad uaaq anpu anuaAv LF4V8T gsaM PUP S -ON APMg5TH xunal Jo uozgoasaagUT auq gP sguouianoadwi i SlNHWaAOUdWI S 'ON 2WMH9IH HNnUl 086T 18 aaquiaoac auTN abed dabPuPW AgTD 'ugaoMusV uoa •aW 0/0 uassPuuPgD 90 A4TO "ONI'NOSOVLN '8 71SOHOS aaaM aogaaagg pasri spoggaul guaulssassp, agq gpuq agou aspaTd - SagTs ssaad pup aaqulnq upuii�Z auq aoi squaulssassp Tpgog aTgpapduloo iUvuRuns -4soO agq.uT.papnTouT anpg am 'uOTgpUIaO.JUT JO quTOd p sV -aaOp /ESS'L'9 go agpa paap uiaojTun p qp passassp aq oq pasodoad sT sagTS -OUI 'sulagslIS F-Tdau pup -ouI 'ssaad agy gdooxa au0 xapd 90 T-IV -paap quaulssassp pasodoad agg sagpoTpuz £-ZOOTT 'ON buTMpaQ pagOpggV -gTgauaq apTM paap aaoul aonpoad oil puaq gsoO tS8'£L9$ agq �q paquasaadaa sp squaUIanoadurr aaggo ags, -au0 Napa ATuo gTjauaq squaulanoadUIT asoug gpuq gOp; agq sT sgsOa asagg go quaulssassp puTgaq aTpuoTgpa ails, -„V gaazgS„ uO SaTgTTT PJ aulps asouq pup '„V gaaagS„ oq anuanV ggL8T UIOJJ gaaagS ggLL gsaM uO sxaoM abputpap pus 'uTpulaagpM 'aaMas Aap4TUPS 'sgaa.zgs 30 gsOD agq sguasaadaa passassp aq oq pasodoad qunoulp 896'£VZ$ agl -spaaooad ;l guaulaaouT xpq Oq aoupTpq auq pup quaulssassp TpToads oq guaOiad 9Z ATagpulTxoaddp pagPDOTTP aq oq ZZ8'LT6$ 3o saangTpuadxa Tpgoq auq uMous anpg am 'aabpupW i4TO agq ulna; UoTgoaaTp oil qupnsand -saangTpuadxa go saTaobpgpo snoTJPA auq aOj xTpuaddp agq uT paquasaad aap suMopxpaaq qsoo paTTpgap 'pauOTquauIiiTsnoTnaad sv -uTaaag pasodoad sguaulanoadulT auq aO3 ,UPU MS gsOO p ST buTMOTTOJ ONIONVNIa QNV SZSOO GaIVWISSa -aouag sapaK _ Maj p aq TTTM paau gsagpaab auq gbnogg uana Y�TTpTgTUT qT pasodoad w anpg am 'snus, -buTOUPUTJ gu91UaJ3UT xpq gbnoagq sT uoTgpzTTpubTs punj oq LLpm oTgsTTpaa ITUO/gsOlu ags, -sapa,,i 8 r�TagpulTxoadd-e go aJTT anTgaajja up spg gDTagsTp quaulaaOUT xpq aqq asnpoaq ATTapulTad F AITpTgTuT pauinssp uaaq spq anuaAV gq�8T gS9M JO UOTgpzTTpubTS 086T 18 aaqulaoaQ uas abed aabpupW �4TO 'ggaOMgsV uOQ 'aW o/O uasspuuPgD 90 AgTO 0NI'N0S0b'W 'W 1190H09 aaOV/Z90'L $ aJOV/6SZ'6 $ GaDV£SS'L $ saaov £'Z£ 896'£VZ$ a4zS aagwna uPuie�Z = agTS ssazd ags SZNSWSSSSSV 'IvioL S'ISVUVdW03 agPH quauissassv Paav quauissassv -4unoury SZNSWSSSSSK QaSOdUdd ZZ8'LT6$ QvZOZ v S 8' £ L 9 spaaooacl quawa.zoul xPy 896'£VZ$ s-uawssasSV TPzoadS SNOIIVDOgrlV ZSOO QSSOdOUd ZZ8'LT6$ ZvZOZ SZT'6T£ =TPubTS PUP uoz-4PzzTaUUPgO S 'ON APmLlbzg xunaL S Z 8` 0 9 SXJOM abPUTP.zQ SVT`6£Z s�aaz�g T68`LTT sa.-4TTzoPd u-TPwza-4PM 9£8'08T$ sai-4zTT0P3 .zaa.T MS ;-eq-FUPS SaUD.IIQN-SdXS SSNSWaAOUdWI SNO XUVd UOJ 2 2EVWWns Isoo uanaTS abPd aGBPUPW A4to 'g4aOmgsV uoQ * IW o/o 086T ' 8 a0gwa3@G uassPquPgD 90 fgz0 'ONI'NOSOb'W V 1130HOS ' OKI ' NOSCVW I 'I'ISOHOS 's.anoA ATnag Aaan -ssnosTp ao quasaad og alquTTanp aq TTTM PUP uOTgtulaOJuT sTgg guasaad bq AgTungaoddo agq.agPToaaddE any -Tusodoad aTgPuosuaa pus aTV; P sT uoTgpdTOTgjpd aTags -S -ON J PPmgbTH Nunas pup anuaAV ggV8T gsaly uo sguaUMAOaduq Aup jog ggbnos aq pTs aTagq puawwooaa @M 'aTaTaad uapS uiOa9 uoTgpdToigjPd ou Jo sTspq aqq uo sgsoo agg paquasaad aAPq am gbnoggTV -ssaaa ags pup .zaquinq upuiA i jog aaJJTp sagPJ agTsoduioo agq 'ATTPgog-poggaui Paap up oq Xopq pa4PTaa uGgm 'sngy --paa-2 ATgapd pup abpgoog guoaJ AT4JPd 0861 18 .zagwooaQ uaagaTgs abed JOBVUPys AgTO 'ggaoMgsv.UOG -aw o/o uossvquagO go AgTO 'O► I'NOSOVVY '8 11SOHOS xIQNaaav 988' 08T$ ZSOD aalvwIlsa 'Iv,L01 Sazouabuz-4uo0 pule snoauPTTeoszW LWtT $ %OT - uoTgoadsul pule butxP-4S L9t,' 6T $ %OT - UOTgPJgSzuzuipV I . T-ebaz ' J6UTJ@auibua 699'VVT$ ISO NOIL0IMISN00 aaIVWIJSH `IVIOL 000'S£ $ uinS duinZ uoz-4PgS -4j?Z 000'TT $ 'd'Z/00'OZ $ a 'd'Z OSS auTrI OOTAa@S JGm@S dOA „9 OLL $ 'pa/00*OL $ 0 'Pa TT uoz-4oauuoj aoTA.zas aANS „g OOT'S $ u°s/OS'8 $ 0 suos 009 (PagsnaD %COT) xoog zapuzg SZS $ 'd'V00'SL $ 0 'd"I L JaSTd aTouupw doi(i 000'T $ 'Pa/00'000'T$ 0 'aa T uoz-4oaS doiCI 'aTouupW OOZ $ uinS dwnZ aTouu-2W buT-4STXa o-. -4aaizuo0 SL6 $ 'd"I/00'SL $ 0 'd"I �T u-4daa Pjgxa 'saTotjuey4 008'tT $ 'pa/00'OOT'T$ & 'pa 8T ugdaa ,OT oq saTouuPW OSt'T $ 'd''I/00'6Z $ 0 'd "I OS ugdaa ,81 - .91 OZS $ 'd"I/00'9Z $ 0 'd''I OZ ugdaa 9T - ,tT 069 $ 'a*i/00'EZ $ 'd "I 0£ ugdaa ,tT - ,ZT OLS`tZ $ 'd*I/00'TZ $ e7 'a*I OLT'T u4daa ,ZT - ,OT 08Z'TZ $ 'd'Z/00'6T $ 0 'd'Z OZT'T ugdaa ,OT - 8 :bu?ppag O 'TO ; -T@maS d0A „8 688'9 $ wnS duinz (%S) uoTglezzTTgoW UaMaS 7,.2iKZINVS SZNaWaAOUdWI aNO XUVd NaSSVHNVHO 20 2ZIO 9TL' V $' TEV'6 $ T£b'6 $ £T£'fib6 $ OS8 $ OST $ sSOO Galvwlssa gVios %S - sazouabuzquo0 pup snoaupTTaDSTW %OT - uoTgoadsui pup buzxpgg %OT - uozgp.zgstuzutpV 's TpbaZ 'bU-TJaauzbuH ZSOD NOISOfMlSNOO QHZKWIJSH 'IKZO,Z uos/OS'8 $ 6 suos OOT urns duinz ZLZ'8 $ 'qq/OT'T $ 'sgri OZS'L OS91T $ 'pH/00'OSS $ 'pH £ 00f, v $ 'pH/00*00t, 'pH TT OO£'£ $ 'pH/00'00£ $ PD 'pH TT OS9'T $ '.a*I/00'OST $ '3'rI TT 00818 $ '12H/00'008 $ 'pH TT 00£'£ $ '3"I/00'ZT $ '3'Z SLZ 058'E $ '3"I/00'izT $ 'a* I SLZ 009'£S $ 'J'I/00'9T $ 'a,ri OS£'£ 16fi,'t $ umS dumrj SZNHWHAOHdWI HNO XUVd NHSSVHNFZHO aO 2=3 Xoog aapuig utpur-Ta'.pM „OT buzgszxH oq goauuoo sbuTggTa uoal gsp0 saATpA AT saATpA „8 saATpA „9 q-4buaZ PJgxH 'TaaJPS qupzpAH SquPaPAH uzpuz -aa'4pM TS 'TO dIQ „9 utptu -a@gPM ZS ' TO dIQ 118 u-rpur -aaquM ZS 'TO dIQ „OT (%S) uozgpzzTTgoW N I VhTd H,I,KM SVT'6£Z$ ZSOO QSSFzwIZSS_ZVZOZ 9 9 S ' 6 $ %S - saTouabui-4uo0 PUP snoau'E?TTaoszW Z£T'6T $ %OT - uoz,4oadsul puu Bu x'e4S Z£T'6T $ %OT - uoz-4ez-4siuiwpV 23 T7eBaZ 'BuiaaauzBuS ST£'T6T$ ZSOO NOIZOIIHZSNOD clalvwISSS ZvZOZ T£6'6 $ 'A'O/OO'Z $ 0 '2�'O 996't not-4an-eoxS appjBgnS 08S'Z9 $ '3'Z/00'L $ a '3'Z OV6'8 za-4-4n0 puL- gjnD a-4azouo0 aTgp-4unow-TnS 9TO'T9 $ uoy/OS'9 $ 0 suns L8£'6 ,Lazena pause-70 %OOT) TanL2zO S 'TO Paz3TPON OOS'SZ $ uos/00'OZ $ 0 suns SLZ'T asano0 aspg snouzwn-4zg ,,Z 8LT'£Z $ '�'S/00'Z $ 0 '2�'S 68S'TT asano0. BuzzpaM snouiwn-4zg „Z/T-T OTT'6 $ wnS dwnZ (%S) uozqrz?zzTTgow SZSS,dZS S,LNaWHAOHdWI SNO NUVd NSSSKHNVHO aO XZIO SZ8'09$ ££t'Z 998 `t, 998 b 099'8t$ 000'8 000'T 009 St,O'T 06 86T OS£ OSL 006 OOS'OT OOS'OT 069'6 OZL'Z LT£'Z $ ZSOo QalvwIZSS 'IK,I,OS (%S) saTbuabuzquoo PUP snoauP M)0sTW (%OT) uoTgoadsul pup buTXPgs ( %OT ) 0AT-4PJ4STUTuipV PUP TPbaq ' bui.IaauibuS ZSOo NOI,LDnUISNOo dSIVNI,LSS 'IV101 wnS duinq wn-S dwn i tunS dwnq uos/OS'S $ 9 Suos 06T '7,'o/00'OZ $ PD '7,'o S'v '7,'o/'00'SZ $ D 'PS/00'OS£$ cPD 'P21/00'0SZ$ 9 'PS/00'006$ 'PS/00'OOL$ '3''I/00'TZ $ '3''I/00'6T $ ',3''I/00' 9T $ tuns duinZ 'A'o 6'L 'PS T 'PS £ 'PS T 'PS ST '3"I OOS ',4 rI OTS 3''I OLT uOTgPAPDXa puod buTggnig PUP buTJPaTO sguTor aiy I adds, '-axuPT9-zagTT3 V SSPTo 'dPg-dTg uo.zdV clod „8T uo.zdv dog „ST saTOuuPW J9m@S uiao-4S SUTSPg g0gPO II 'To 'cIDU „8T II 'To 'dog „ST SZNSWSnogdWI SNO X2iKd NSSSVHNVHo 30 )=3 II 'TO ' dDH „ZT (wnWTxPW %S ) uOT4PZ TT TgoW SHEOM .SOXNIFIY� Q SZT'6T£$ S9L `ZT O£S'SZ 0£S'SZ 00£'SSZ$ 000'OOT OST OOL OOi,'Z ££6'Z 000'L 806'6T VVT' 6 Isoo Galy ilsa 'IViol saz0u9bui4uo0 S snoauPTT90STW (o0T) uoi-4oadsul PUP buTxP-4S (%OT) uoTgPa4sTuiutpV PUP TPbaZ 'buzzaauzbua ZS00 NOIlDn'dISN00 QSZKWIZSS 'IVIOs uinS duinq '2�'0/00'SZ '2�10 9 'PS/00'05£ $ 'PS Z '3''I/00'OZ $ '3''I OZT S/0£'0 $ '2�'S LLL'6 o`d/00' 005£$ CD) 'off' Z -a-U/00'9 $ :v) -J 18T£'£ uos/00'VZ $ 9 suns T8£ %tS'£T '7,'S/00'Z $ 9 '2�'S ZLL'9 OZS'££ uos/00'OZ $ �D suns 9L9'T Z£6'8Z uos/00'9 $ P suoy ZZ81V ZT6'i,Z '2�'0/00'£ $ '2�'0 VOC8 L S T' Z T $ uinS duin j uo-r-4PzzTPu5-rS dPg-d-rg uoadv d0u „8T dDU 8T butuoThW buipaaS apzspPog aaqgn0 pup q.InO aga.zoizo0 8T9-9 (UP-rpaW -TO-; .0 aPaM (Tb£Z) snouTuingTg paxTW 4uPTd (Ti7£Z) asano0 bu-raPaM snouiuingTq paxTN-4uPTd (T££Z) osano0 asug snouiumgTg p9xzW-4uPTd asPg a-.PbaabbV S ssPTO paTJTpoW Moaaog uounuo0 (tuntuzxPW %S) uoT4PzTTzgoL1 NOISVZ IUVMSI S QNV NOIZKZ I'IHNNFIHO S 'ON 7,VMHOIH XNMIJ, SZN2WSA02ddWI SNO >I'dVd NSSSVHNVHO 30 2=0 A LSLO-Str9/Z L9 3NOHd3l31 • VM9G V.L0S3NNIW "inVd *IS • H11f0N 3nN3AV M31A81V_A 999 1d301N3Wd013A30 A iNf1WW0j 2 �ti0 d3a ©BAUAZ)3a N3SSdHNdH3 J0 A110 qI TmS_ 5ATTn f 19TIzo3 TszuQ uosTavo •g aougamu•I uOSTzuD amozaf u0410yl STuzo :33 TfP:83 •zf `AOppaS �uEz3 1�r `.iTazaouTg -am TTEa 04 agvITsaq IOU Op asuaTd °suoTisanb due 9APq noA 3I •guTiaam poo8 u ansq not Io znoj aqj adog I •zuaA Ixau uassuquugD jo SITO aqq 04 9TgTsuaj atom goafozd sTgj aAem 4g2Tm IT IpajudToTIzud aTZTuzd uapa zo/pue au �T 4Egl STRIO p9m1OJuT OsTu I •aTaTuad uapa moll uoTauzad000 aSuznooua of paaoozd gsaq use aq Moq gas 04 nos To aaagq aqj gjTM 3aam o4 9-ATT pTnoM aq pup sTgI op 04 $uTTTTM aq pTnoM aq jagj sum panTaaaz I uOTIeoTpuT agy •S APM12Tg ojuT louq sloauuoo jugj 199als qj+q pasodozd Mau aqq uo Aliadozd, sTg sjngE jugj Isoo juamssasse aqj uT aledToijaud o:j 2uTTTTM aq pTnoM aq JT 2Tuz0 False I •dlzadozd ydq a114 uo S Aumg2TQ Io apTs zagIO aqa uo puoz aqj SuTpuaIxa q;TM SuOTE amTI amiss aql 3u g asegd 2uTop zapTsuoo stgTssod Ig2Tm Kagq jugj pue .lead Ixau amTjamos V asugd uo Suiliv .s aq pTnoM S4TD aql qugj 2Tuzo pamzoTuT I •Q I a `q `V asegd UT sjuamaaozdmT aql SUTMogs anuq am IugI IeTd pazoToo aqj mTq 9AE2 I •Agzadozd auo laud aqa of do sinqu jugj aTzTuad uapg uT puuT 30 sazou ppZ sTaIemTxozddv sumo oqM uogzoN 2Tuzo gqTM dam I AEpos Igog puu °-3:joog IuoQ luau LT£SS Ind `uasseguugq aAllu zaITnOD 069 TagTEM qog •z uT 7�I- ST ' ax gjzoMgsy uoQ -aN Z96T `T£ jsnSny u f "Jopmb 3fulei3, � 20uricil Meeting Ali,,, 6- The City Manager was instruct. to verify with the City Attorney whether.any building permit considered for the property would require City Council action in advance of issuance. PARK ONE IMPROVEMENTS: Julius Smith and Frank Beddor were present. Julius Smith requested that the Council allow the developer to postpone utility installation until 1983 because they will not serve the addition proposed for The Press, Inc. Mayor Hamilton moved to approve the Park One improvements and issue a building permit. Direct staff to prepare a formal resolution authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications for the municipal improvements and finding the petition to be sufficient. Direct staff to prepare a formal resolution authorizing work as a M.S. 429 tax increment project. Waive a public hearing. A petition from the owners agreeing to pay assessments in excess of the tax increment. A development contract outlining the scope of the project including timing, assessments, increment philosophy. The bonding of the project to be done in the Summer of 1983. Motion seconded by Councilman Geving. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilmen Neveaux, Geving, and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman Neveaux moved to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: a. Animal Control Ordinance, Impoundment Procedures and Charges for Impoundment. (Staff will rewrite the $2.00 late fee section.) b. Kerber Blvd., Chanhassen Lakes Business Park, North and South Frontage Roads East Highway 5 Public Improvement Projects. RESOLUTION #82-46 Adjusting Interest Rates. d. Boulevard Tree Policy. Motion seconded by Councilman Horn. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilmen Neveaux, Geving, and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. AGRICULTURAL PRESERVES ACT: RESOLUTION #82-47: Councilman Horn moved the adoption of a resolution certifying lands eligible for agricultural preserves as shown on Map A. Resolution seconded by Councilman Geving. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilmen Geving and Horn. Councilman Neveaux voted no. Motion carried. BUILDING PERMIT MORATORIUM ON FAST-FOOD RESTAURANTS: Mr. Beck, Attorney representing Mr. Bob Mason, was present. The Planning Commission recommended that the Council establish a 6-month limited moratorium on fast -foot restaurants for all C-2 and C-3 zoning districts lying south. of Highway 5. The Assistant City Attorney reminded the Council that if they do adopt an ordinance establishing a moratorium, the Council should setforth their rationale for which they selected the properties that are subject to the moratorium. The inclusion of P-3 zoning districts was discussed. Councilman Horn asked if the moratorium could be expanded to include video arcade type of uses. The public hearing was held only on fast-food restaurants. The Assistant City Attorney stated that video arcades are not included in the present C-2 or C-3 permitted uses. A leter was received from Mr. David Sellergren, Attorney, dealing with the issue of a building permit moratorium. The Council directed the City Attorney to respond to Mr. .-r Minnesota Department of Transportation District 5 2055 No. Lilac Drive Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422. J e t , 1982 1 � p Mr. Bob Waibel Chanhassen Community Development Department 690 Coulter Drive P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 In -Reply Refer To: 315 S.P. 2701 T.H. 5 Plat review of Park One, Second Addition located in the northwest quadrant of TH 5 and West 184th Ave. in Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlots A and B of Park One in the City of Chanhassen, Hennepin County Dear Mr. Waibel: ? fob (612) 545-376I We are in receipt of the above referenced plat for our review in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Surveys. We find the plat acceptable for further development and do not anticipate any adverse impacts on our existing system. Our District Land Surveyor, Mr. Keith Slater, is presently monumenting and platting the existing trunk highway right of way in this area. Your surveyor should contact him to ensure continuity of the common boundary before the plat is finalized. If you have any questions in regard to this review, please contact Evan Green at 545-3761 ext. 119. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sin rely, . :. �Cra ord, P.E. District Engineer / cc: Charles Weaver Metropolitan Council Mike Reiter Hennepin County t � 6 1 1 �. u._i4. An Equal Opportunity Employer 7610 LAREDO DRIVEoP.O BOX 1476CHANHASSEN, MINNESCA 55317 (612) 474-8885 April 2, 1980 Instant Web, Inc. Attn: Mr. Jerry Carlson 581 W. 78th Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Jerry: As I noted during our meeting of this past week, I am unable to prove or disprove the "1979 Estimated Annual Taxes - Comparative. Study of Southwest Suburban Communities" report prepared by Arnie Hed for Instant Web. The calculations shown by Mr. Hed are accurate, i.e. formulas used for determining assessed value, application of mill rates, and updating this information to assure that changes in potentia 1 mill rates were included. One factor, which the report did not take into consideration, is differences between the'".- ssessorI s market value and 'hctual market value." -Differences in these two figures can and will alwayO exist primarily due to the fact that the assessor's values a 3re approximately 2 years old at the time taxes are paid and because of time delays inaccumulating information in regards to sales. P, a result, assessors reduce the market.value to approximate the difference in percentage between the assessor's value versus current constz'uction costs. This percent differential assures that new propErties are not paying a disproportionately higher tax, simply because heir property is coming on new, in comparison to other properties Whose values are two years old. By reducing the current value by -the approximate differential occurring on all properties within -the taxing district, all properties are then being treated similar and all can be proportionately increased in future years. Of importance in this light, however, is the fact that the differential o-C assessment rates is not uniform in all taxing districts. For example, some cities or counties may keep the differential between the 'hs ,- ,f--ssor' s market value"and. "true market" value at a higher percentage t1'ien another area. As long as all property owners within that to ding district are being treated similarly, this makes little or in o difference. However, it does make a difference if a property tax analysis is made between taxing authorities without taking factor Mr. Jerry Carlson _� -2- t- April 2, 1980 info consideration. Specifically, if the Carver County Assessor's office is valuing property at approximately 82% of market value, all properties within the taxing district will be proportionately lower than another community having exactly the same total market values but using a 90% ratio. In this example, if the dollars collected by all governmental units were exactly the same, the mill rate of Carver County would be higher than the mill rate of the community having the same market value. In this hypothetical example, although the mill rates between the two communities would be significantly different, the actual taxes paid by a home or business would be exactly the same. As I noted, the only accurate way to determine differences between assessors offices in comparison to market values is to carry out a thorough research matching all sales within a community versus the assessor's market value for those same parcels. Assuming that approximately 100 sale prices were compared to "assessor's value", a fairly reliable ratio can be developed to make accurate comparative tax analysis. These types of ratios are prepared by the State and are available for public inspection. Additionally, the Citizens League (a non-profit, non -partisan public affairs and research group) uses these statistics in conjunction with applicable state laws and mill rates to make comprative tax analysis. I am attaching a copy of the 1980 estimated tax comparison prepared by the Citizens League. It. is important to note that, based on mill rates only, that Chanhassen, as shown in Mr. Hed's report, Chanhassen.is higher than other communities in regards to mill rates. However, when the differences in sales ratios are taken into account, Chanhassen taxes are reasonably comparable with other cities and are less than a majority shown in the example by Mr. Hed. Again, it is the sales ratio (difference between what different assessors establish for a assessor's market value versus the market value as established by the actual sale of the property) which significantly changes the tax picture. For example, if the sales ratio as prepared by the State, is used to determine potential taxes for Instant Web, the following differences would occur: Estimated Net Instant Web Taxes Tax - Instant Based on Corporativ Gross Tax Web (Mr. Hed's Analysis State of. From Mr. Report) Minnesota/Citizens Community Hed's Report League Chanhassen112 364,280 266,288 246,14.0 Chanhassen 276 318,429 232,772 253,444 Chaska 112 358,190 261,836 265,287 Eden Prairie 326,190 238,554 250,900 Edina 281,400 205,703 228,483 Minnetonka 325,960 238,276 254,400 Shakopee 353,665 258,529 265,021 Waconia 381,150 278,620 257,485 Mr. Jerry Carlson -3- , � April 2, 198G r As.I started at the beginning of this letter, I cannot prove or disprove the figures presented by Mr. Hed. .Similarly,. I cannot assure you that the taxes as generated through the Citizens League report would be correct. The problem with the Citizens League report is that, although the statistical base is sufficient to reflect differences in '-assessor's market value" versus 'actual market value" for residential properties, there is not a sufficient statistical base for commercial properties. Logically, these two would be the same, but not necessarily. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me_ Sincerely, Don `Ashworth City Manager DA:k VOLUME XXIX, NO. 3 PUBLISHED BY THE CITIZENS LEAGUE LISPS 114-1,90 A ro erly Tax 'ro-r-,As �r T To 10/1-0 OT 21Ue._. A 1980 tax of about S615, or just. slightly over 1 percent of market value, is the median property tax on homesteads with selling prices of S60,000 among the 92 largest cities in the metropolitan area, according to the annual Citizens League survey of homestead property taxes. The median tax on a representative homestead as a percent of market value is at its lowest level since the CL began its surveys in the late 1960s. In the first . years, the CL used a homestead-.K7th a selling price of S18,000 as "representa- tive." The figure has been raised periodi- calty since then. - In last year's survey the median tax (on a S50,000 house) was about 1.6 percent of market. A graph in this issue. shows the trend since 1968, The median is a point where the taxes on a repre- sentative homestead in one half the cities are higher and where one half are lower. The League's estimates reveal reduc- tions in property taxes from last- year ranging from 14 to 39 percent on these representative homesteads. These reduc-. tions represent a shift in burden —to other taxes and to other taxpayers —not a reduction in government spending. . Minneapolis, which ranked highest in estimated taxes in the last five Citizens League surveys, dropped to 13th this year. Cities with the highest estimated taxes on a S60,000 homestead (school district number is in parentheses): Jordan (717) S849 Golden Valley (275) 826 Belle Plaire (716) 778 Blaine (16) 777 Prior Lake (719) . 769 St. Louis Park (283) 769 Chaska (112) 746 Mound (277) 737 Shakopee (720) 736 Richfield (280) 720 (Taxes continued on page 3) February 5; 1980 What NYM Happen to- -1931 Property Taxes?. - Several factors will influence. what happens to property taxes in 1981. Some persons far large increases in homestead taxes are likely - This much is certain: the remaining gap between limited market value and -estimated market value will be closed, meaning an increase in homestead value, even without further adjustments for inflation_ . Some changes will offset these in- creases. The Legislature is making. a slightly larger percentage of homestead value exempt from taxation, and the homestead credit is being increased another S50. If after these adjustments, the assessed value of hornesteads goes up proportion- ately more than other properties, then a tax shift to homesteads would occur. Among the unknown factors is whether government spending, in total, -will rise faster than assessed valuation, in - total. If it does, and if state aids don't offset the difference, then the mill rate will increase, along.writh taxes. Another unknown is what will happen to the selling price -of housing and the extent these changes are reflected in assessors' estimated market values. - If property taxes rise in 1981 over I980, part of the reason may lie in the fact that the bulk of the Legislature's" _ reaction to the need to eliminate limited - market value was "heavied-up in the `. -first year of the two-year. phase -out, Ieaving little more for 1981. For example;°;. while the homestead credit is being' increased by a total of S275 over 'a two-year period, most of the increase,-_- S225, is being given in the first year.: For illustrative purposes only, here is what might happen to a S60,000 home- stead in Mounds View, where taxes are:_.. near the median. Assuming no chance in estimated market value due to inflation,. - the estimated market value would be - $57,420, up from S47,698 in 1980. If the' mill rate in 1981 were identical to 1980," taxes would be 5719 next year, up from S6I 7 this year, but still below $8401ast `,'= year.` PAGE 2 1Estimated Taxes ©n $50,COO Homestead Communities.Cve,r ZEW Population an Metro Area (Change from 1979 includes 16.6% inflation factor in value of house) �. 1980 Rank S Decrease % Decrease Community and Estimated 1 (high) to From 1979 From 1979 N bar Tax 90 (low) To 1980 To 1980 SCh001 DISLHCL um Afton (834) -$406 92 $ 65 13.8 0 Andover (11) 497 83 202 23.9 Anoka (11) 594 48 243 29.0 Apple Valley (196) .589 50 292 33.1 Arden Hills (621) - 503 SQ 233 31.7 Bayport (834) . .. . 502 82 127 20.2 Belle Plaine (716) 778 3 220 22.0 Blaine 06) - 777 4 247 24.1 Bloomington (271) 623 37 294 32-1 Brooklyn Center (286) __ 629 32 307 32.6 Brooklyn Park (279) '_. 617 41 331 .. 34.9 - Burnsville (191). ^ -522 : 70 278 34.8 Champlin (11) --" 642 28 248 27.9 Chanhassen 012) 637 30 257 28.7 Chaska (112). .746 -- 7 227 23.3 Circle Pines (12) - - ,_649 - _ _'. 26 286 30.6 Columbia Heights (13) 568 57 204 26.4 Columbus Twp. (831) 507 ``.78 258 33.7 Coon Rapids 0 1). 573 : 55 279 32.7 Corcoran (877) - %643 -27_:. __ 198 23.5 Cottage Grove. (833) 604 43 261 30.2 Crystal1231) -..:.602 46 292 32.7 Dayton 01) - - - 550 60 _ 252 31.4 Deephaven(276) 639 '29 215 25.2 Eagan (197) -': 440 88:: 164 27.2 East Bethel (15) 662 22 278 29.6 Eden Prairie (272) 702 15- 291 29.3 Edina (273) 589 -51 :. 228 27.9 Excelsior (276) 622 = 38 ,_ :,. 223 26.4 Falcon Heights (623) 596 4T= =: '.: - 177 22.9 Farmington (192) 509 - -75 321 38.7 Forest Lake (831) -- -: 549 _:- :.62 230 29.5 Forest Lake Twp..(831) _ :. , 473 = 84'. = _:: -76 - ' - 13.8 Fridley (14) -542 -64 247 31.3 Golden Valley (275) 826 - 2 _ - 225 21.4 Grant Twp. (832):• ....:_ ..-: 438 .- - . '89 85 16.3 - Ham Lake (11f:`'- 502 ' 8t 252 33.4 Hastings (200)--. ;> : - 513 74 230 - 31.0 _ Hopkins 1274} 60"5 2t 284 . 29.9 Hugo (624) 460 .86 139 23.2 Independence (278) 668 2Q _ 166 19.9 Inver Grove Heights (1991 .' =''466 85 124 _ 21.0 Jordan (7i7) 849 F 1 154 15.4 Lake Elmo (834) 519` 73 189 26.7 Lakeville (194):.,.. _'52t _ 72{. _ ;..' 254 - >_:. 32.6 Lino Lakes (12) - 676 =19 ."_ _ 257 27.5 Little Canada (623) 602 '.45 :: 5 - 296 33.0. MahtomFdi (832) 522 - .71 256 ' 32.9 Maple Grove (279) - 612 42 302 33.0 Maplewood (622) - -. 630 31 :.. 207 24.7 Nledina (278) 683 16 183 21.1 Nlendota Heights (197) 433 90 174 28.7 Minneapolis(1) 708 t3' 306 30.2 Minnetonka (276) 718 11' 255 26.2 Minnetrista (277) • 704 14 131 . '.'% 15.7 Mound (277) 737 S .' .- 166 13.4 pdounds View :521) 617 "40 223 26.5 2980 1979 Total Total Mill Rate - Milt Rate 103.503 101.623 _ 81.335 82.397 92.502 94.199 104.336 -106.675 92.044 --104.906 • TOT.152 132.003 104.993 95.159 96.487 89,740 92.996 94.490 113.221 115.179 103,527 94.491 88.313 90.511 93.296 104.644 94.489 . 87.912 96.929 86.490 97.572 98.645 90.404 105.327 100.071 . 95.811 112.182 .104.776 89.314 108.880 98.384 . 8Q.587 102.513 97.989 100.774 100.975 133.907 105.197 99.854 103.008 97.694 97.211 97.888 116.76 113.68 106.029 91.774 91.832 91.913 92.660 104.216 99.871 88.536 103.377 88.053 100.508. 103.969 90.388 110.413 108.203 108.950 113.738 95.575 89.269 110.993 _ 96.193 _' 83.865 105.724 105.863 97.264 100.850 101.473 90.629 : 91.061 -. 139.591 144.211 97.940 10 T A56 97.626 99.490 _:. 106.485 106.799 ' 108.736 118.698 112.649 116.324 90.505 100.064 - 102.314 114.475 109.854 106.810 _ : 88.552 90.119 111.817 125.362 100.471 105.839 108.281 113.545 105.306 107.350 2.= 99.002 112-076 1980 Ltd_ Market Vacua 534,565 49.170 49,616 44,773 _ 44,797 - 41,453 41.946 50,542 49,500 49,127 51,751 45,844 - 50,464- 43,335 45,912 " 46,997 47,850 46,641 49,766 51,022 45,169 - 49,046 50,087 49,306 42,283 49,792 50,700 50,379 45 487 46.533 -43,837 40,999 38,470 48,927 50,529 38,071 49,933 41.741 49,713 38,830 48,642 _ 40,642 41.813 43,760 - 43,981 46,762 43,730 39.285 - 51,193 46.649 45,800 41,021 45,916 50.473 46,991 49,148-_ 47,698 PAGE 3 ) (Taxes continued from pave 1) Citi:;s with the lowest estimated taxes: Afton (83,W:-) S406 Spring Lake Twp. (717) 423 Mendota Heights (197) 433 Grant Twp. (832) 438 Eagan (197) 440 Nest St. Paul 097) 456 Hugo (624) 460 Inver Grove Heights (199) 466 Forest Lake Twp- (831) 473 Andover (11) 497 The estimates do not include special assessments. The Legislature took several steps in 1979 to reduce homestead property taxes, including more state aid to local governments; an increase in the portion of homestead value which is exempt from the property tax; and a big 'increase in direct state aid to homeowners via an enlarged homestead credit, from a maxi- mum of S325 to a maximum of S550. Moreover, additional benefits -not incorporated in the League's tax estimates -will be provided to most homeowners through property tax re- funds related to income that will be mailed next October. Such a refund is popularly known as the circuit breaker - For households where incorne is under S21,000, a total of S1,000 of circuit - breaker and homestead benefits are possible. If household income is between S21,000 and S36,000, the circuit breaker refund gradually disappears. All home- owners, irrespective of income, are eligible to receive up to a maximum S550 homestead credit. Benefits for elderly households. are higher. = A homeowner with S20,000 house hold incorne paying S600 in net property taxes (after deducting the homestead credit) on a S60,000 house will receive another S194 refund in October, which would make the actual property tax bur-'' den about S406, or less than .7 percent of the selling price of a S60,000 house. A court -ordered end to a limitation on the market value of homesteads for tax _ purposes prompted much of the Legi lature's efforts to shift the tax burden this year. The Minnesota Tax Court ruled unconstitutional a state law which had limited the annual increases in value of homesteads for tax purposes, irrespec- tive of what was happening to. selling prices - (Taxes continued on page 4) 1.77... ? (Change from 1979 includes 16.6% inflation factor in value of house) 1980 Rank S Decrease % Decrease 1980 1979 198D Ltd. Community and ;. Estimated 1 (high) to From 1979 From 1979 Total - Total Market School District Number ,Tax 90 (low) To 1980 To 1980 "Mill Rate Mill Rate Value New Brighton (621) :"$565 58 S285 33.5% 94.380 109.590 $47,767 New Hope (281) ' 627 34 336 34.9 91.23$ 97.788 51,3S6 Newport (833) 507 _ 77 254 33.4 104.076 108.644 40,896 North Oaks (621) 534 - 65 122 18.6 90.148 103.260 47,860 North St. Paul (622) .:• 623 ..36 193 23.7 99.683 112.355 47,638 Oakdale (622) - 593 - 49 278 31.9 95.463 104.070 48.325 Oak Grove Twp. (15) 532 68 245 31.5 90.925 93.256 47,434 Orono (278) 537 52 191 24.6 97.124 102.549 4T,429 -." Osseo (279) 545 65 333 37.9 88.389 95.187 49,479 ' Plymouth (284) 582 :: - 53 282 32.6 86.553 92.478 52,003 Prior Lake (719) - 769 5 177 18.7 128.246 12S.72t 42,696 Ramsey I11)-=' ` 526 69 224 29.9 85.018 84.102 49,642 Richfield (280) - - 720 - 10 214 22.9 101.402 103.950 50,157 Robbinsdale(281) '661 23 ` 293 30.7 98.835 105.274 49,243 Rosemount (1961 '.542 63 332 38.0 ' 100.677 108.708 44,270 Roseville (623): ; `. "`, 573 56 218 27.6 97.747 107.040 46,700 St. Anthony (282) 654 - : 25 = 300" - 31.4 97.808 102.470 49,427 Louis Park. (283) 769 9 19St. 104.t94308 51,0436 > Saint Paul (625) . -- 17. 235 25.6 115.081 129.778 44,093 : St. Paul Park (833) - .682 509 - 76 223 30.5 " -103.194 104.119 41,278 Savage (191) `:- :., _-'-714 12 249 25.9 123.823 125.843 42,427 = Shakopee (720): .".-..: `.736 -_- = 9 ° _ _ 147 -:;:- 16.6 118.411 117.572 44,614'. Shoreview (6121 578 f 54 252 30.4 95.664 109.206 47,711 - - (276) 604 235 28.0 97.611 107 906 47,802 -Shorewood South St Pout (6) 622 �= 39 249 28.6 1t9.S66 117.818 40,982 Spring Lake Park (16! �':._628 33 237 27A 103.410 101.563 46,379 - . _ Spring Lake Twp. (717) :.: 423 9t 117 21.7 101.298 103.475 Stillwater (834}. 533 67 . 293 35.5 108.808 114.700 41.033 41,38 Vadnais Heights (624) 661 24 227 25.6 105.637 126.747 46,613 _` NJaconia (110l. `` . 677 18 +" lib 14.8 124.020 119.60 41,385-- Wayzata (284) 551 59 243 _ 30.6 89.157- 95.080 49,547 West St Paul (197) 456 87 210 31.5 90.561 ' _ 94.941 41,943 White Bear Lake (624) 624 - 35 246 28.3 _ 103.248 121.626 46,309 White Bear Twp.(624) 505 79 208 29.2 95.880 115.725 43,523 Woodbury (833) - = : 550 - 61 251 - 31:3 i02.i97 101.613 44,257 ` We followed a slightly different procedure for Shakopee in arriving at our estimate of 1980 limited market value. Because of a major reassess- ment in the previous year -the impact of %-jhich is being felt for the first time in 1980 taxes -residential values in Shakopee for 1980 were not further adjusted for inflation during the time since the reassessment took place, according to the Shakopee assessor. Our estimate of limited market value for Shakopee, therefore, takes into consideration the impact of the reassessment without an additional inflation adjustment. Such an inflation adjustment, however, was made for the other cities in the survey. If we had not made an exception in Shakopee's case.our estimates would have revealed taxes in Shakopee increasing, which would have been inaccurate, according to the Shakopee assessor_ - : :: - -- , PAGE 4 (Taxes continued from page 3) The Leg4slature is phasing out the limited market value concept over two years. Approximately one-lialf of the dif- ference between limited market value and estimated market value was removed for 1980 taxes. The remaining one-half is to be removed for 1981 taxes. Mean- while, inflation is causing estimated market value to rise, too. We had to take special steps in esti- mating 1980 taxes to reflect the partial phase -out of limited market value plus the overall inflationary impact on the price of homes. The final column on our chart illustrates the limited market value which we used for each city in the survey, which is arrived at through the use of special research data available from the Minnesota Department of Revenue. It is intended to be a representative indicator of the limited market value for 1980 taxes for a house with a selling price of $60,000. What this means, -of course, is that our estimates apply . to. 'a representative homestead which is assumed to be actually worth S60,000 on the open market, not the value which has been assigned to the property for tax purposes. Someone whose limited market value as determined by the assessor is S60,000 will find his actual tax hk;her than the figure in our tax table. Of course, such a house more than likely has a selling price considerably in. excess of S60,000. " For purposes of estimating the change in net property taxes in 1980 from 1979, we assumed an increase in selling price of 16.6 percent between the two assessment years on which taxes in 1980 and 1979 are based. The Department of Revenue arrived at the 16.6 percent figure through a comprehensive comparison of residen-. tial sales from one -'year -to the next._ Thus, we have rise a. house with, a selling price of S51,458 for 1979 taxes . And S60,000 for 1980. A 16.6 percent increase in a S51,458 house brings it to S60,000. 71 Steps We FoDowed To Find 1980 Faxes Here are the steps we followed in preparing our 1980 tax estimates (using Mounds View as an example). 1. Estimate 1979 limited market value. We applied the 1978 residential aggregate ratio for limited market value (73.8 percent for Mounds View) to a market . value of S51,548. The result was S37,976 (for Mounds View). 2. Estimate 1980 estimated market. value. We applied the 1978 residential aggregate ratio for estimated market value (95.7 percent for Mounds View) to a, market value of S60,000. The result was - S57,420 (for Mounds View). 3. Arrive at 1980 limited market value. According to law, this shall be deter- mined by adding one-half the difference between 1979 limited market value and 1980 estimated market value, or 10 percent of 1979 limited market value, whichever is Qreater. For Mounds View, therefore, the 1980 limited market value became S47,698. 4. Calculate assessed value. For 1980 taxes, the law provides that assessed value shall be 18 percent of the first S21,000 of limited market value and 30 percent of the balance. For the 'Mounds View example, S47,698 in limited market value becomes S11,789 in assessed value. S. Apply mill rate to assessed value. The mill rate is nothing more than a fancy way of expressing a percentage. A mill rate of 100 mills, for example, is 10 percent: The result is the gross homestead tax: Applying the '`sounds View -mill rate of 99.002 mills to an assessed value of S1I,789 produces a gross homestead tax of SI-,167. :. 6. Apply the homestead credit. The creditAs one -halt the gross tax, to a maximum of S550. For the Mounds View exam ple,subtract S550 from S1,167 fog a net tax of S617. A regularfeature, announcingmeet- ings, TV and radio programs, and conferences of interest_ Citizens League Breakfasts Minneapolis,.-, Grain _ Exctianoe Cafeten 3rd-St and..lth_ eve.- 5S'7 30- 8 30=-a riT s _K ..�4 Y:....- ..�_ . Tuesday, February 12: BOB CHRISTENSON Chairman, West iVletro Hospital Trustees - "Emerging Health Care Issues' - Tuesday, February 19: SENATOR HOWARD KNUTSON District 53 - ."The Suburban Caucus: Issues and Agenda" Tuesday, February 26: TOM 30HVSON Hennepin County Attorney Saint Paul, " The ^Pilot House ' Resfaurarit= First National Bank Bldg. - (Use-: Robert: Street entrance.). r:30=8:30 a_in Thursday, February 14: To Be Announced Blooming t'on; Noitfi�vest Ffiean`cil Ce`ritzr Cafeteria, South side;.of.1-494-arXer es Ave_ S. (Ground Ievel it tlie_-northwes[ comer -_of: t?terbuiiding::).��30=830`� �:i*�yj Friday, February 29: - _ . VERN NEPL -_ - State I-R Chairman "Minnesota Politics 1.980" Second class postage paid at Minneapolis, MN-. - y1 �. CITY OF b�� CHANHAOSEN `� 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. 80X 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 CERTIFIED MAIL March 18, 1982 Mr. E. Jerome Carlson, President Instant Web, Inc. 571 W. 78th Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: "Park One" Developer's Escrow Account Refund Dear Jerome: As you requested, I am refunding the full current balance of $4,099.37 from the "Park One" escrow account with this mailing. Since the initial refund of $4,399.69 was sent to you on .February 24, 1982, the City received and subsequently confirmed an additional billing from Schoell and Madson, Inc. A copy of this billing and supporting documentation is enclosed for your records. Of the total invoice amount, $900.63 is attributed to work performed relative to Park One development plan review. The balance ($381) relates to the preparation of the Engineering Feasibility Study which is being charged against the Tax Increment District (#2). A revised breakdown of Park One Escrow Account activity since the account was established is also enclosed for your reference. Since Park One lies entirely within Tax Increment District No. 2, and since you've indicated that no development is planned for this property during the next year, you should be aware of the legal ramifications if no development occurs within the next three -five. year period. The Tax Increment Act under which this district was established provides that the entire Tax Increment District collapses if no bonds are issued or if no public improvements are constructed within three (3) years of the creation of the district. The district was established on December 15, 1980, so the sale of bonds or construction of public improvements must be accomplished by December 15, 1983. y1 Mr. E . Jerome Carl ...n Page 2 1't The Act also provides that individual parcels fall out of the tax increment district if no site preparation occurs on that parcel within five (5) years from the district's establishment. With the above limitations in mind, I encourage you to strongly consider development of Park One lands during 1983 and to begin planning efforts towards that end within the next six months. If I can be of any assistance or if you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Scott A. Martin Community Development Director SAM:nh Enc. cc: Don Ashworth, City Manager Kay Klingelhutz, City Treasurer 19 CITY OF 31-. CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 MEMORANDUM TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager FROM: Scott A. Martin, Community Development Director lk� DATE: January 8, 1982 RE: Review of Cost Allocations for City Consultant Work performed relative to the "Park One Subdivision" proposal and the establishment of Tax Increment District #2 (Economic Development District). As you directed, I have reviewed the city files pertaining to Park One Subdivision and Tax Increment District #2 in order to determine what agreement, if any, was made between the City and Instant Web, Inc. concerning responsibility for costs incurred by the City in the establishment of Tax Increment District #2. As you recall, Jerome Carlson contacted you last month about costs charged against the "park One" escrow account which he felt were not the responsibility of Instant Web, Inc. According to my findings, a report prepared by you (dated August 4, 1980) which was directed to the City Council recommended the establi.shment of a developer's escrow account to pay for the cost of consultant studies required to determine the feasibility of establishing a tax increment district for Park One and adjacent properties. However, this recommendation stated that the developer would be obligated to pay such costs only if the district was not ultimately established. If the tax increment district was established by the City Council (as occurred-_ on December 15, 1980) you recommended that the cost of all related studies be charged against the newly established district. You further recommended that escrow monies be refunded to the developer if such occurred. According to the City Council minutes of August 4, 1980, your recommendation was approved by the Council and.necessary feasibility studies were ordered. On November 21, 1980, Instant Web, Inc. deposited $10,800 in an escrow account with the City. This action followed your request of November 20, 1980 that Instant Web remit $4,800 to cover one-half the cost of the BRW feasibility study (estimated to cost a total t Memorandum - Januc 8, 1982 Page 2 of $9,600). Apparently, the additional $6,000 deposited on November 21, 1980 was intended to cover one-half of the cost for an engineering feasibility study to be prepared by Schoell & Madson. Our records are rather vague in this area however. The actual cost of the Schoell & Madson study was $11,742.50. From reviewing our records, I've concluded that the City and Instant Web entered into a "Gentleman's Agreement" concerning each party's financial obligations in the event a new Tax Increment District was or was not established. It seems to me that the City should accept the responsibility for full payment of the costs of these studies, and that an adjustment should be made in the Park One escrow account as shown in the attached proposed "Revised Breakdowns of Park.One and Tax Increment District No. 2 Costs". If you approve the Park One escrow account balance adjustment as proposed, I would recommend retaining a minimum balance of $5,000 in the escrow account in order to cover future processing costs for City review of the Park One Subdivision plat, which has not yet received preliminary or final approvals. The remaining $4,057.75 should be refunded to Instant Web immediately upon �`•J receipt of your written approval. I will work with Kay to \ � ,,1, correct both accounts according to your direction. �C-C ATTACHMENTS 1. Summary "History of Park One Subdivision/Economic Development District #1" 2. City Manager's report on Park One Development Proposal dated August 4, 1980. 3. Excerpt from City Council minutes of August 4, 1980. 4. Revised Breakdown of Park One Subdivision Consultant Costs. 5. Revised Breakdown of Costs Attributable to Establishment of Tax Increment District 42. cc: Bob Waibel, City Planner Kay Klingelhutz, City Treasurer 7-i:s /c:::7: cl µ c, I a.r 7 oc.eS. i/ O w Y 7 II // 7/7(.e dtSc�o w t 64.f ij r Co //tG7''iY% O[ : Serb D 4 : A J *a c le ., /y O J s _ ,iN W- -"popmr t v Got..A—Gi% l f._ C ct.t1; 0 � s( l �a�2 — %: ��P ./� 7 .� /h t� N • ,/ts. c�/.t a J � 0.GGw'-t 7' : // � /_. a �:1 •' TZ /ti T. � Ile F2 December, 1981 "Park One" Subdivision/Economic Development District #1 Wk-L44kq History of Project Cost Agreements May, 1980- Initial, informal request by Beddor/Carlson for extension of utilities to serve Park One and for creation of E.D.D. June 10, 1980- "Petition for Creation of an Economic Development District and Tax Increment Financing District for Park .One Replat" received by City. June 16, 1980- City Council received petition, but tabled action pending Attorney's report. Jai August 4, 1980- City Council authorized solicitation of proposals for preparation of Engineering Feasibility Study, and also authorized preparation of E.D.D. (tax increment financing) plan by BRW. City Manager report of 8/4/$0 recommends establishment of escrow account to pay for cost of studies if E.D.D. is not established; E.D.D. would pick up cost of both studies, if established with monies deposited in escrow by developer refunded. Project must be guaranteed by Letter of Credit in order to proceed with public improvements. October 31, 1980- BRW cost estimate of $9,600 to prepare E.D.D. study received. November 7, 1980- BRW intra-office memorandum states that ".apparently (Instant Web) has agreed to pay one-half of the cost of the preparation of the (E.D.D.) study and they have already at this time provided to the City their payment equal to one-half of the cost, so there are funds available to that extent at this time:" (Escrow account records show that $10,800 was deposited, but not until November 21, 1980.) November 20, 1980- Letter from Ashworth to Beddor requests remittance of $4,800 to City for one-half cost of BRW E.D.D. study. November 21, 1980- $10,800 received from Instant Web; $4,800 for one-half cost of E.D.D. study, and $6,000 for Schoell & Madson feasibility study. December 15, 1980- City Council approved establishment of E.D.D. January 19, 1981- BRW invoice for preparation of E.D.D. study in amount of $9,017.25 received and charged against Park One escrow account. One-half of this amount journal entried to, E.D.D Fund #467 on 6/30/81 as per Manager's letter of 11/20/80. Balance of $4,508.63 retained as balance due in Park One escrow account. January 19, 1981- Invoice from Schoell and Madson in amount of $11,742.50 paid from escrow account funds. 1-41 d 7610 LAREDO DRIVE*P.O. BOX 1474CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 ! / MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Manager, Don Ashworth �i DATE: August 4, 1980 SUBJ: Park One Development Proposal: a. Approve Concept Development Plan ..°I b. Consider Economic Development District -Report - City Attorney c. Public Improvement Petition, Consider Authorizing Feasibility Study Td Approximately one month ago, the City Council reviewed the concept plan for Park One as proposed by Frank Beddor and Jerry Carlson. This consideration followed Planning Commission action to approve the concept plan. However, this was not presented to the City Council for concept plan approval, but rather for informational purposes to determine whether to proceed with the secondary question of whether this property could or should be located within an economic development district. Action on potentially establishing an economic development district was tabled to allow the City Attorney's office to prepare a report as to legal proceedings and Iwo. review �Aie information submitted by Jules_Smith, representing Mr. YBeddor d Mr. Carlson. E3a. Approve Concept Development Plan: As noted.above, Council action on the concept plan did not previously occur. Approval is recommended with the developer instructed to follow proceedings outlined for preliminary development plans -such being submitted to the Planning Commission. Consider Economic Development District Report - City Attorney: Attached please find a report from the City Attorney's office outlining legal issues posed in potentially considering establishment.of an economic development district. After reviewing the attorney's report, overall concept plan, and previous information submitted by,Mr. Beddor and Mr. Carlson, the City Council should determine whether the information submitted is sufficient to proceed with requirements outlined for the establishment of an economic development district, i.e. Does the City Council believe 6UE K 'Mayor and Council -2- August 4, 1980 that the information submitted to date justifies a positive Al finding in regards to the six findings that must be made at a future public hearing? Should the Council believe that the six f indings.can be made and that preliminary 13 information warrants further investigation of establishing a economic development district, the City Council should: q 1. Authorize preparation of a contract by Schoell and Madson, to carry out a feasibility study for public improvements within the Park One area; and 2. Authorize preparation of a contract, with BRW, to prepareQtax increment financing plan incorporating into such public improvement costs as prepared by Schoell and Madson and as outlined -in the City Attorneys report under the "Plan Document". Should the City Council approve the concept of further proceeding with the establishment of an economic development district, the Council,,.,.should.-. determine_ that costs of both the feasibility_ -study as well as Plan Do_current shall be costs borne by the developer until sur_h timeNas a determination is made as to whether or not the district/public improvements will be completed as6publzc improvement;;project"s ore:not __ _.._ er If_such_we determined to be an economic development district, costs of both �the _P.lan Documerif_.as �ue11as_pubhic�improvement feasibi_l,ity studies would_become a cost of "the cm econoi development district and monies escrowed by the developer for both the_feasibility _study-and-planbeemitted— to. the -developer., Should the Council determine not to establish an economic development district, but to proceed with the installation of improvements as a public improvement project, the costs of the feasibility study would become a part of assessible costs. This option would mean that the developer would then lose escrowed monies placed for the economic development district plan, but would be remitted monies placed for the feasibility study. The final option would be that the Council would determine not to proceed r with either the economic development district or public improvements, in which case the developer would lose monies deposited for both the development plan as well as the feasibility study. c. Public Improvement Petition, Consider Authorizing Feasibility Study: Methods of paying the costs associated with the feasibility study were outlined above. However, it is important to note that the request to complete the feasibility study, at.this time, is in advance of other typical proposals received. The points raised by the developers are reasonable in considering whether the feasibility study should be conducted now rather than following preliminary development plan approval, i.e. preliminary development plan approval involves reviewing actual lot dimensions, topography surveys, location and size of utilities, type and size. of streets, drainage plans, etc. However, this same type of information is required in preparing a feasibility 3 Mayor and Council -3- August 4, 1980 3 LE II study and, if the feasibility study is completed. in advance`of submitting the preliminary development plan, both the City and developers benefit, i.e. the developer is not paying twice to prepare the same information and the City, in reviewing the preliminary development plan, can be reasonably assured that the improvements shown within the development plan meet city standards and can be built in the manner outlined within the development plan. Again, the primary question posed to the City Council is whether improvements within Park One would be considered to be installed by the City as a public improvement project assessed back to benef itting properties.' If such determination is made, it does appear reasonable that such study would be completed at this point in time. Similar to other public improvement projects which are considered to be installed and assessed to primarily one benefitting property owner, a letter of credit, guaranteeing 100% of assessable costs, would be required prior to ordering the public improvement. . 17v_.�_e was presenr- Lo review items nor- completes as setrortn in the non-contormi.ng f use permit. No action was taken. The City Attorney will proceed with court action against Baltic 3rporation and Transamerican Ir rance Company. r�LAKE LUCY WATERMAIN PFja=: The City Manager discussed his report o fJul g � Y 21 1980. The Planning Commission recommended that the Council not construct the Lake Lucy Road watermain but instead drill another well at wellfield U. Primary concern by the Planning Commission was the comparison of $125,000 for a new well versus $330,000 for the Lake Lucy Road watermain construction. Council members discussed a connection from the new well in Chanhassen Lakes Business Park along State Highway 5 west to Galpin Blvd. and north on Galpin Blvd. to the existing well. Councilman Neveaux moved to table action until the City Manager defines the costs of running a line along Highway 5 to Galpin B1v& and ways to fund the project. Motion seconded by Councilman Swenson. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hobbs, Councilmen Pearson, Neveaux, Geving, and Swenson. No negative votes. Motion carried. NORTH AREA ASSESSMENT - HOWARD VERLO: Mr. Verlo was present requesting an explanation of his assessment. The City Attorney will meet with Mr. Verlo to explain the assessment. PUBLIC NUISANCE, 6689 NEZ PERCE DRIVE: A signed petition was received from the residents of the 6600 block of Nez Perce Drive in Carver Beach requesting assistance in restoring the neighborhood to the quiet and safe place it was. Captain Al Wallin, Sheriff's Office, and several neighbors were present. No action was taken. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PETITION, LOTUS TRAIL: A signed petition has been received requesting the paving of Lotus Trail. Several residents were present. Councilman Pearson moved to authorize a feasibility study for the paving of Lotus Trail and refer the question as to how to resolve the apparent conflict between the Carver Beach Plan and actual property usage patters to the Park and Recreation Commission and Planning Commission for their consideration. Motion seconded by Councilman Geving. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hobbs, Councilmen Pearson, Neveaux, Geeing, and Swenson. No negative votes. Notion carried. PARK ONE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL: Julius Smith, Jerry Korsunsky, and Daryl Fortier were present. The Planning Commission has recommended that the Council approve a generalized sketch plan reflecting that the northerly portion of Park One be developed as a planned industrial area. Councilman Pearson moved to authorize staff to solicit proposals to prepare a feasibility study and prepare a tax increment financing plan. An escrow account will be established to cover all possible contingencies involved in the preparation of reports and staff time. Motion seconded by Councilman Neveaux. The following it, voted in favor: Mayor Hobbs, Councilmen Pearson, Neveaux, Geeing, and Swenson.No negative votes. Notion carried. Mayor Hobbs moved that assuming the project is feasible, in order to proceed under either a public improvernent project or an econanic development district the City Council is of a mind that the project would have to be guaranteed. Motion seconded by Councilman Geving. The following voted in favor: Mayor Council Meeting August 4, 1980 -3- Hobbs, Councilmen Pearson, Neveaux, Geving, and Swenson. No negative votes. Motion carried. SIGN LIGHTING REQUEST - NEW HORIZON HOMES: New Horizon Hanes is seeking approval to light their existing off -premise advertising sign located on Highway 5. The Sign Co[nnittee and staff recommend denial of the request. .. „_ December, 1981 nil_ _1 % _ T TTTrT nr'.�T TT TAT771^T.TAT TT TT7 lIT.T 1-1 C T TD TI TT 7 T C T nTT 11 tIf IM CT TT MIA ATM Yin ems (Period from May, 1980 to December, 1981) Developer's Escrow Account #920 Consultant Larson and Mertz Schoell and Madson Total Costs = Development Review Costs $1,124.15 843.10 $1,967.25 Total Escrow Receipts = Escrow Acc't. Balance = $ 11,025.00 $ '9,057.75 (as of 12/31/81) REVISED BREAKDOWN OF COSTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT #2 (Period from May, 1980 to May, 1981) City Fund ##467 Consultant Larson & Mertz Schoell & Madson BRW, Inc. Coordinated Management Minneapolis Star and Tribune Month July, 1980 August, 1980 November, 1980 December, 1980 February, 1981 May, 1981 Consulting Fees $ 719.40 79.00 353. 10 1,187-40 6.60 275.50 November and December, 1980 $11,742.50 November and December, 1980 9,017.25 November and December, 1980 678.31 November and December, 1980 Carver County Herald November and December, 14%0 TOTAL = 212.00 21.63 $24,292. 69 CHANHASSEN HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 690 COULTER DRIVE P.O. BOX 147 • CHA-NHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (61 2) 937-1 900 January 6, 1982 Mr. Jerome Carlson, President Chanhassen Chamber of Commerce % Instant Web, Inc. 570 W. 78th St. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Jerome: As we discussed today, I would be happy to update the Chamber of Commerce Membership on the current status of the Downtown Redevel- opment Project at your meeting of January 26, 1982. I would also expect that the HRA Chairman Bill Gullickson, Mayor Tom Hamilton, and City Manager Don Ashworth would be willing to answer questions and/or present their own status reports if you so desire. I will be looking forward to meeting with the Chamber on the above date. In the meantime, if you have any questions concerning the Downtown Project please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Scott A. Martin Executive Director Chanhassen HRA SAM:nh cc: Doi-: Ashworth Tom Hamilton Bill Gullickson 4*1 ::.> :��;�.�f�x. -�== ;,}.� _ - ..._._._,...ram»- - . • - - _.__...,.�_ ....... CITY OF �� 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 CERTIFIED MAIL February 24, 1982 Mr. E. Jerome Carlson, President Instant Web, Inc. 571 West 78th Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Park One Developer's Escrow Account Refund Dear Jerome: As you requested in December, 1981, I have completed an evaluation of the Park One Escrow Account and have determined that substantial adjustments are in order based on your agreements with the City Council during 1980. According to City records, your escrow account for Park One should not have been charged for costs associated with the establishment of the Economic Development (Tax Increment) District, which includes all of Park One and several other adjoining properties. These costs were primarily for services rendered by the City Attorney, Schoell and Madson (engineering feasibility study), and BRW, Inc. (tax _increment study) . A total adjustment of $18,763.07 has been credited to your escrow account for correction of this error. Consequently, as of February 4, 1982, your Park One escrow account has a cash balance of $9,399.69. Since you've indicated that you are still interested in proceeding with the development of Park One during 1982, the City will retain a $5,000 escrow balance to cover anticipated future costs associated with this project. The remaining $4,399.69 is being refunded to you at this time (see enclosed check). A revised breakdown of Park One Escrow Account activity since the account was established is also enclosed for your reference. Mr. E. Jerome Car L ii -2- February 24, 1982 If you have any questions concerning this matter, please don't hesitate to contact me. I would be most willing to review the account adjustments in detail with you at your convenience. I apologize for the inconvenience this may have caused you. Sincerely, �k k ��- , Scott A. Martin Community Development Director SAM:k Enclosures cc: Don Ashworth, City Manager Kay Klingelhutz, City Treasurer CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 Laredo Dr., Chanhassen, MN 55317 NUMBER VENDOR NAME 4Eg itc OUR P.O. NOT-- 077?00,1 TNSTANT DATE INVOICE OUR ACCOUNT NUMBER '92�J-flflfl-�r�Jfli u CHECK TOTAL'�� PLEASE DETACH BEFORE CASHING REMITTANCE DATE CHECK NO. ADVICE _ fi2-22-82 10017529, AMOUNT NET -- - 4099 •£g 4099�69 I I I I I I I I I I I i CITY JF ZI41gz AVA 7610 LAREDO.DRIVE 0 P.O. BOX 147 0 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 PARK I ESCROW PAID MAY 21, 1980 '225.00 LARSON & MERTZ May 1980 Conf on 5-23 w/DWA and Mayor Hobbs re Park 1 26.40 SCHOELLL & MADSCN June 1 thru July 31, 1980 Meetrins 4 Hours @ 40.00 160.00 TRANSFER FROM FUND #932 (two accounts open) 10.84 LARSON & MERTZ November 1980 13.20 ESCROW PAID NOVE=R 21, 1980 '10,800.00 LARSON & MEF9Z December 1980 250.80 SCHOELL & MADSOIN Feb 1 thru Mardi 31, 1980 Meeting with Craig Morton and with Eden Prairie staff 8 Hrs @ 44.00 352.00 LARSON & MERTZ April 1981 Conf on 4/13'w/D4Q and SM re IW and Park One matters; preparation of outline of memorandum, of intent re Park One; draft memorandum of intent on 4/16 're Park One development and public improvement installation and assessment; telcon on 4/27 w/atty Smith re letter of credit ; attend Council meeting on 4/27 re memorandum of intent: 522.00 I -ARSON & MERTZ May 1981 Conf on 5/15 w/SAM and BM re Park One matters and letter Hof credit language covering payment of public improvements; IW conf on 5/20 w/DKA, SAM, 91, and Jules Smith and :.Jerome Carlson re Park One plat and financing, 1W conf on 5/21 w/EWA re Park One project, financing and application of tax increment; IW review on 5/26 of file in prep for plan- ning cam-Lission meting of 5/27; 1W office conf on 5/28 re drainage problems; selection of road center line and feasibility study requirements under Chapter 429: 311.75 REFUND TOP I (as per Scott Martin) 399.69 BALANCE 2-Y-82 5,000.00 7�. S CITY'_ -OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 October 16, 1981 Mr. Frank Beddor c/o Instant Web 570 West 78th Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Frank: In response to your request to proceed onto the preliminary plat review of Park One, I have discussed with Daryl Fortier this morning, some of the revisions needed to the present exhibits that would be necessary for a preliminary plat review. Since the next regular Planning Commission meeting at which this could be reviewed is a scheduled holiday for the City, I anti- cipate that the earliest a preliminary plat public hearing could be held would be November 25. Additionally, the City Treasurer has informed me that the escrow account for Park'One is in a deficit position. In order for this office to publish a public hearing notice, I will need to have this matter resolved in accordance with the attached state- ment dated October 13, 1981 on or before October 30, 1981. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Bob Waibel City Planner BW:bf cc: Scott Martin, Community Development Director Bill Monk, City Engineer Kay Klingelhutz, City Treasurer -7 g S POO KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS, INC. ZONING ORDINANCE REVIEW CITY OF CHANHASSEN ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS - INTERIOR DESIGN July 8, 1981 Re: Instant Web, Inc. Comm. No. 79-15-01 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Zoning P-3 Planned Community Development District Permitted Uses Industrial Uses (Comply with P-4 Standards) Land Use Building Coverage 195,925 sq. ft. (.31.95%) Parking Coverage 201,050 sq.. ft. (32.79%) Landscaped Coverage 216,177 sq. ft. (35,26%) Total Site Area 613,152 sq. ft. (100%) Construction Type II 1 Hour Lighting High Pressure Sodium Shielded from Glare Open Space Designated along Riley Creek as part of Subdivision of Park Two Performance Full compliance with ordinance section 12.07 for Standards noise, vibration, dust, smoke and odors, glare, and wastes Landscaping Site Drainage Setbacks Required See submittal plan by Landscape designer See submittal plan by Civil Engineer No mandatory requirement 1-1 used for reference, 30' front yard 25' side and rear yard CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED '3UL 91981 CQMMUN1TY DEVELOPMENT DM. 570 GALAXY BUILDING 330 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55401 (612)339-4200 ZONING ORDINANCE REVIEW CITY OF CHANHASSEN PAGE TWO Provided Front 180 ft. Side 135 ft. adj, to bldg, lot 60 ft. adj. to Highway 5 10 ft. adj. to railroad Parking Required Manufacturing Office Warehousing Provided AREA Instant Web Office Prep. Dept. Employees Production (Over Shift) No mandatory requirement 1-1 used for reference 1 space per employee 1 space per 200 sq. ft. gross floor area 1 space per 1.5 employees on major shift 356 spaces shown SIZE INITIAL FINAL 13,209 sf 6,000 sf 5,193 sf 109,094 sf 30 9 56 (1/1950) 30 50 15 135 (1/1350) 75 Sub -Total 133,496 sf 125 spaces 275 spaces Leasable Office 14,578 sf (20%) 73 (1/200) - Production 58,311 sf 58 - Sub -Total 72,889 sf 131 spaces TOTAL 206,385 sf 256 spaces 275 spaces Recommended reduction to 300 spaces. LARISON & HERTZ ATTORNEYS AT LAW • 1200 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST T L RUSSELL H. LAR5014 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 / ^ TELEPHONE CRAIG M.MERTZ !„I I'� (612) 335-2565 OF COUNSEL June 24, 1981 VWWW+ HARVEY E. SKAAR MARK C. MCCULLOUGH Chanhassen housing and .Redevelopment Authority CITY OF CHANHASSEN c/o Scott A. Martin, Executive Director RECEIVED Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 Jury 2 5 1981 Re: Instant Web Premises: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. Parcel I - The North 500' of the East 220' of the NW1/4-NW1/4 Section 13, Township 116, Range 23, in Carver County, Minnesota Parcel II - The North 500' of the West 180, of the NE1/4-NW1/4 Section 13, Township 116, Range 22, in Carver County, Minnesota Gentlemen: We have caus--d the title to the above described premises to be examined as of May 19, 1981, at 9:00 A.M., based on Abstracts of Title I and II. From such examination, we conclude that said premises were owned as of that date in fee simple by Community Investment Enterprises, Inc., a Minnesota corporation. Such ownership is subject to the following: 4. 1. Rights, if any, of the parties in possession other than said owners. We have been advised that the following named parties claim an interest as owners of the premises by virtue of a contract or contracts for deed with the fee owner: a) E. Jerome Carlson and Julianna M. Carlson, husband and wife, b) Frank Beddor, Jr. and Marilyn A.`Beddor, husband and wife, c) Frank Beddor III, a single man, d) David Anthony Beddor, a single man, e) Steven Michael Beddor, a single man, f) Michelle Marie Beddor, single, by her guardian, Marilyn Beddor. 2. Mechanic's lien rights, if any, for recent improvements upon said premises or property connected therewith. 3. Special assessments, if any, which may be levied upon said premises. Chanhassen HRA c/o Scott A. Martin June 24, 1981 Page Two 4. Public zoning or building ordinances and regulations. 5. Facts which would be shown by a survey of said premises. 6. Taxes are paid. 7. The current Abstractor's Certificates on both Abstracts are not adequate because they exclude documents without legal descriptions and should be made good from the beginning to cover the descriptions used in this opinion. 8. Ordinances shown at Numbers 39, 61 and 79 of Abstract II also shown at Numbers 40, 60 and 80 of Abstract I. 9. An agreement in 101 Deeds 60 (No. 65-I and 64-II of abstracts) purports to create easements for the benefit of the premises. The abstracts are not certified to cover these easements and we exclude them from this opinion. 10. Rights of Minnetonka Laboratories, Inc. as Lessee in an unrecorded lease dated January 22, 1968, recited in 101 Deeds 60 (No 65-I and 64-II of abstracts), and also disclosed in 60 Mortgages 395 (No 62-II of abstract). The rights of lessee in the premises are required to be extinguished by a quit claim deed and placed of record. 11. We have actual knowledge of the fact that Instant Web, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, occupies the premises purportedly under the terms of a lease with those individuals named as owners in paragraph 1 of this opinion. A certified copy of such lease should be furnished this office for further examination and opinion. 12. Rights of Animal Fair, Inc., as lessee in an unrecorded lease dated February 8, 1968, disclosed in 60 Mortgages 399 (No. 63-II of abstract). The rights of this lessee in the premises are required to be extinguished by a quit claim deed placed of record. In the event any portion of the premises is leased to Animal Fair, Inc. pursuant to Section 12 of Exhibit D, forming a part of that certain Contract for Acquisition and Development, dated May 20, 1981, between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and others, the HRA and this office should be furnished with a certified copy of any such lease for our further examination and opinion prior to the closing of said contract for acquisition and development. 13. Existing Roads. (a) There are road easements over the North • 75 feet of Parcel I and the North 33 feet of Parcel II recited in 59 Mortgages 562 (No. 57-I and 59-II of abstracts). (b) There is a Notice of Lis Pendens in Z Misc. 60 (No 49-I and 55-II of abstracts) filed by the State for the taking of highway, including snow fence easements and Chanhassen HRA c/o Scott A. Martin June 24, 1981 Page Three• access limitations, which affects the North edge .(c) Final Certificates in L Misc. 466 (No. 23-I of the premises for Highway No. 5, and includes and.a limitation on access. of the premises. of abstract) takes part snow fence easements We have requested copies of the above referenced documents from the Carver County Recorder for our examination and further opinion as to the ownership of these easements. Additionally, we have also requested a copy of an instrument recorded at Book 115, page 264, Records of Carver County, which may demonstrate an interest of Carver County in these road eaements. The aforementioned contract for acquisition and development provides for the acquisition of the premises, including the road easement areas, described in the caption of this opinion. Therefore, the HRA will acquire the fee under the road easements at the time of acquisition of the captioned premises. However, in our opinion, it is necessary, at this time, for a determination to be made as to whether the state or county is the true owner of the road easements and limited access restrictions which make up CSA Highway No. 16 (West 78th Street). Action by the City to acquire these road easements from qither the state or the county should be taken prior to the institution of any vacation proceedings. We have included this discussion of the road easement matter in this opinion for the purpose of bringing it to your attention at this time so steps can be taken to ultimately acquire the easements from the present owner thereof. 14. The description in entry no. 55 of Abstract I for 93 Deeds 598 seems incomplete. We cannot tell if it affects the premises. This is a power line easement granted to Northern States Power Company. Abstractor should complete the description if it is not complete in abstract. If complete, the easement should be located of record. 15. Without an adequate map or survey we -cannot tell if the deed in 98 Deeds 537 (No. 63-I of abstract) or the easement in 61 Deeds 498 (No. 42-I of abstract) affect the premises. 16. The description in 101 Deeds 66 (No. 66-I and 65-II of abstracts) is not acceptable because it describes the premises in two different ways that are -not exactly the same unless the NW 1/4 NW 1/4 and the NE 1/4 NW 1/4 are both perfect squares. We require a quit claim deed from Frontier Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, grantor in that deed, using the description in this opinion. Current searches will be required as to Frontier. Chanhassen H RA c/o Scott A. Martin June 24, 1981 Page Four 17. Life interests in Parcel II reserved by N.Rossbach, also known as Nicholaus Rossbach, and Anna Katherine Rossbach, husband and wife, in Register of Deeds 341 (No. 5-II of abstract), 4 Deeds 449 (No. 9-II of abstract) and D. Misc . 424 (No. 10-II of abstract) . These must be terminated of record. 18. Abstract II also covers land lying South of the property described herein. We are limiting our opinion to the description described herein. For the reasons set forth in paragraphs 1, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17 of this opinion, we are of the opinion that the title to these premises is not marketable at this time because of the clouds on title created by documents and other references set forth in said paragraphs. We have attached to this opinion copies of all abstract entries referred to above (except City ordinances). The abstracts have been delivered to Kohlrusch Abstract & Title Service, Inc., for title insurance binder pu ose . very tPn�:60uks u`RUSSELL H. LARSON Chanhassen City Attorney RHL:ner enc cc: Don Ashwc�rth Jules Smith Frank Beddor, Jr. E. Jerome Carlson Jay Kohlrusch -s ue CITY OF I� CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE 0 P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 October 16, 1981 Mr. Frank Beddor c/o Instant Web 570 West 78th Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Frank: In response to your request to proceed onto the preliminary plat review of Park One, I have discussed with Daryl Fortier this morning, some of the revisions needed to the present exhibits that would be necessary for a preliminary plat review. Since the next regular Planning Commission meeting at which this could be reviewed is a scheduled holiday for the City, I anti- cipate that the earliest a preliminary plat public hearing could be held would be November 25. Additionally, the City Treasurer has informed me that the escrow account for Park One is in a deficit position. In order for this office to publish a public hearing notice, I will need to have this matter resolved in accordance with the attached state- ment dated October 13, 1981 on or before October 30, 1981. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Bob Waibel City Planner BW:bf cc: Scott Martin, Community Development Director Bill Monk, City Engineer Kay Klingelhutz, City Treasurer m CITY OF s CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE•P.O. BOX 147•CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Manager, Don Ashworth DATE: June 16, 1980 SUBJ: Park One Development Proposal, Carlson/Beddor, Discussion Item Frank Beddor and Jerry Carlson had requested an opportunity to present their overall development plans for Park One (an approximate 40 acre parcel located north of Highway 5 and east of Dakota; such site presently housing the "Press" building on the southwest corner of the property). If this property is to be considered as an "economic development district" such should be considered in advance of Planning Commission/ City Council action regarding rezoning or subdivision - thus the reason such is being presented to the City Council at this time. This item is being presented as a discussion item in an effort to allow the developers an opportunity to present their concepts and desires in regards to the development of this property. It is recommended that action be tabled until such time as the City Attorney has prepared an opinion in regards to the development proposal and staff recommendation received. The City Council may additionally desire such future action to encompass other points of concern of Council members. KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS, INC. June 11, 1980 The Mayor and City Council City of Chanhassen 7610 Laredo Dr. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Park One Comm. No. 79-15 Honorable Mayor and Council Members: ARCHITECTS / PLANNERS / INTERIOR DESIGN Park One consists of approximately forty acres of industrial zoned land on the easternmost edge of Chanhassen along Highway 5. With the exception of The Press, Inc., the land is undeveloped. There is public road and utilities just to the North of The Press, and this frontage road dedication continues to the Eden Prairie line. This frontage road divides Park One approximately in half. The South half is relatively flat, agricultural land and is fully visable from Highway 5. This area is readily developable. The North half is heavily wooded and presents considerable topographic relief (up to 60 feet). It is also divided by a natural hollow which provides drainage for a sizeable area. To develop a typical industrial park on this site would be difficult and ecologically undesirable. Vast quantities of earth would have to be moved to create a relatively flat site. Almost all trees would be removed. The drainage pattern would rely strictly on storm sewers, creating potential hazards at discharge locations. Given these constraints, it is proposed that the North half of Park One be an earthsheltered, environmentally compatible development. The key to this solution is constructing a road which works with, and not against the topography. This has been done, and the road as shown on the drawings requires only minor cutting to present a gently rolling profile. This enables us to maintain the natural drainage pattern and create a "duck pond" for excess runoff. It also maintains the natural, wooded character of the site and removes only those trees absolutely necessary to construction. The buildings will be set into the hillsides with a front "walkout" profile, creating a minimum building mass. With such earthsheltering, these buildings will also be highly energy efficient. 555 SHELARD TOWER 600 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD 18 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 (612)546-5381 The Mayor and City Council City of Chanhassen Comm. No. 79-15 Page 2 We are excited and pleased with the belief that Park One will be a development everyone will be proud of. Sincerely yours, KORSUNSKY ANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS, INC. c� Darvl F. Fortier DPF/gew 1a a CITY OF 7610 LAREDO DRIVEoP.O. BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 + June 6,. 1980 Julius C. Smith Attorney at Law 215 Yorktown Office Court 7101 York Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 Dear Jules: I. am. in receipt of. your. letter d?;June 4, 1980 and will place "Park V on the June 16th Cit1r Council agenda. As you noted in your letter, enclosures for such meeting should be at City Hall. on June 9-th, but in no case later than June 10th.. I believe the outline as submitted.i:n your letter of June 4th is in accordance with our discussion's of May 23rd. ^i Should either yourself,.Mr. Beddor, or Mr. Carlson have any questions in regards to procedures to be followed on June 16th, please contact me. Sincerely, Don Ashworth City Manager DA:nw cc: Frank Beddor, Jr. Jerome Carlson Russell Larson JULIUS C. SMITH Attorney at Law 215 YORKTOWN OFFICE COURT 7101 YORK AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55435 (612) 831.8530 June 4, 1980 Mr. Don Ashworth City Administrator City of Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Park One Dear Don, �(•'" A► "`Yip' JUN198fl �,H�sSEW As a result of our meeting at Instant Web on May 23 attended by yourself, Russ Larson, Walt Hobbs, Jerome Carlson, Frank Beddor and myself, I am preparing a presentation to be made to the City Council at its meeting on June 16 concerning the establishment of an economic development district for Park One for the purpose of employing tax increment financing to reduce utility and other development costs. As stated in my letter of May 21 to Mr, Larson (copy attached) , such districts need not involve the HRA or interfere in any way with its redevelopment project. On June 9 I will submit to you a brief description of the Park One project, a short description of an economic development district and how they function, and some exhibits which we would request you distribute to the Council along with the agenda for the June 16th meeting. Also, a petition to create a municipal economic development district and a tax increment finance district will be presented. At the request of Mr. Beddor and Mr. Carlson, I have requested the con- sideration by the Planning Commission of the Park One replat project (No. 79-15) be postponed until after the Council meeting of June 16. I attach a copy of that letter. We have received the cost estimate report from Scholl and Madson, Inc, relating to utilities and streets for Park One, a copy of which I am en- closing in the unlikely event you had not as yet received a copy. As indicated in my letter to Russ Larson, we are prepared to work up a method to eliminate any risk to the City in the event of increment fi- nancing shortfalls; and I believe, Don, that these kinds of programs can be creatively negotiated to the advantage of all parties concerned so as to lessen any adverse impact which may result from relocation necessitated by other worthwhile city projects. �1 June 4, 1980 Mr. Don Ashworth Re: Park One Page Two If you feel any other information we have relating to Park One would be helpful, if submitted to the Council with the agenda, let me know and I will get it to you immediately. Thanks. Yo r very truly , ius mi cc: Frank Beddor, Jr. Jerome Carlson Russell Larson JCS/md JULIUS C. SMITH Attorney at Law 215 YORKTOWN OFFICE COURT 7101 YORK AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55435 (612) 831-8530 May 30, 1980 Mr. Don Ashworth, City Administrator City of Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Park One Comm. No. 79-15 Dear Don; As a result of our meeting at Instant Web on Friday, May 23, Frank Beddor and Jerome Carlson, the developers of Park One, hereby request that the preliminary plat of the replat of Outlots A and B, Park One , be rescheduled from June 11 , 1980 to June 25, 1980. The purpose of this request is to allow sufficient time for the equitable owners of Park One to make a presentation to the City"' Council on June 16 relating to the creation of an economic develop- ment project and tax increment financing district for the area. This deferment before the planning commission will aid in the proceedural dovetailing of these matters. If you have any questions , please call. Yo s very truly, j lius C . Smith cc: Mr. Frank Beddor, Jr. �Mr. Jerome Carlson JC S /nw J U N 1.980 WCElVED VRAPM CWJ MINN. ,,; MVILLIAM D SCHOEL� CARLISLE MADSON JACK T VOSLER JAMES R OAR HAROLDE DAHLIN LARRYL HANSON JACK E GILL RODNEY B GORDON THEODORE D KEMNA JOHN W EMDND KENNETHE ADOLF WILLIAM R ENGELHARDT BRUCE C SUNDING R SCOTT HARRI DENNIS W SAARI GERALD L BACKMAN S'CHOELL & MAOSON. INC. ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS 6121 93B-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343 OFFICES AT HURON. SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON. TEXAS May 23, 1980 F-"IZr Korsunsky Krank Erickson Architects 555 Shelard Tower Inc' ti; f;,_�`'� 600 South County Road 18 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426 MAY 27 1080 Subject: Park One Dear Mr. Fortier: Pursuant to your authorization, we herein transmit cost data for streets and utilities in Park One. The attached maps best describe locations of the proposed improvements. We have only included cost totals, however, the detailed breakdowns are available should you want them. Note that two alternatives have been presented for the sanitary sewer. These costs are for construction only. Obviously the cost information presented is rough in that topographic, soils, and field investiga- tions were not done. Following is the cost summary: Item Sanitary Sewer Alternate A Alternate B Watermain Streets Lowest Total Estimated Construction Cost $ 142,438 134,096 -93,292 191,315 $ 418,703 Please advise as to questions. Total cost of our services is $348.00. Attached is our invoice for this amount. Very truly yours, SCHOELL & P-SADSON, INC. JROrr:mkr 1 enclosure F �G PGA P S�. P v G� ALL 5RAVITY SEWER SHALL BE 8 " PIPE ALL WATERMAIN SHALL BE 10 " PIPE 4v 'C 4" DIP FORCEMAI 4 LIFT STATION CONNECT TO EX15TI NG MANHOLE CONNECT TO EXISTING TEE z Li N tn a S z Q U LL I0 SCALE I"= 200 w EE U ` Z a � e 01 4` 3 I 0\) 01 j LEGEND SANITARY SEWER ~ SANITARY SEWEF N QP FORCEMAIN " AND WATERMAIN w WATERMAIN Al T_A I HL I ST TE HWY NO. 5 I ' I SC HOELL AND M A DSON INC. II QP v� e r V� V 'aka SCALE 1":206' 1 1 STREET TYPICAL STREET 28'-0" BACK OF CURB TO BACK OF CURB A 4v 91 W Q cc a c� z V i� � W / I 0 � W W `�_CONNECTTO EXISTING LL 0II PAVEMENT AT THIS F 0 II POINT. N Ili I U I I g I 00,10) I � } I I STREET _PAVING I I STATE HWY NO. 5 I ' ~ SCHOELL AND MADSON INC. CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLE CONNECT TO EX15.TING TEE i LIFT J STATION ALL WkTERMAIN SHALL BE 10 PIPE ALL GRAVITY SEWER SHALL BE 8" PIPE ALL FORCEMAIN SHALL BE 4 PIPE SCALE I"= 200' w EE cr a z w 0 w LL 0 } F- t U t z �! t W e 0-1 V,i 4Z7 LEGEND SANITARY SEWE s t GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER " AND WATERMAI A I w WA ERMMAIN Al T— B I ST E HWY NO 5 I I — — --- — — --- SCHOELL AND MADSON INC. z w U) V) a x z a x u LLI0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE*P.O. BOX 147oCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 5.5317 (612) 474-8885 May 22, 1980 Mr. Daryl Fortier Kornsunsky, Krank and Erickson Architects 555 Shelard Tower 600 South County Road 18 Minneapolis, MN 55426 Dear Daryl: According to our discussion the other day, this letter is being sent to inform you of the materials yet needed for the Instant Web replat request, over and above those already submitted. 1) . Boundary line survey, -.'including measured distances and angles, which shall be tied into the nearest quarter section or section line by traverse. 2) . Total acreage. 3). Location and width of existing streets including type of servicing, sanitary sewers, watermains, storm sewers, culverts, grades, invert elevations and location of catch basins, manholes, hydrants and any other underground facilities within_the.plat and to a distance of 100 feet beyond. 4). A copy of restrictive covenants, if any, on -'`all abutting .land. 5). Any data such as soils tests that would be available at this time. 6). Proposed names of streets. 7). Locations and widths of alleys, pedestrian -ways and utility easements. 8). Profiles of existing and proposed center line grades of streets, alleys, sanitary sewers, watermains, storm sewers, - drainage ditches and culverts. Mr. Daryl Fortier -2- May 22, 1980 9). Layouts of lots and blocks with numbers of each, square footage of lots and lot dimensions scaled to the nearest 1/10th of a foot. 10). Areas, other than streets, pedestrian ways and utility easements, intended to be dedicated or reserved for public use, including the size of such areas. _ 11) . Proposed method of disposing of surface water drainage within and beyond the limits of the plat (this has been discussed in a general nature with the Planning Commission, however, it is time more detailed graphics and narratives are required). 12). Proposals for street lighting, curb, gutter, sidewalks and boulevard improvements. 13)• In light of the present single access situation of Park One, a narrative portion should be submitted describing how such will be ameliorated through the development of the area in question and any MnDOT findings on a secondary access. For your purposes of compiling the proper information for preliminary plat, reference should be made to sections 7 and 8 of Subdivision Ordinance 33. If you have any questions or comments on the above, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, /1--Z ob Waibe Land Use Coordinator BW : k ,� � C ITY'O F hm S S, .55317 7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O. BOX 1476CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA (612) 474-8885 INSTANT WEB REPLAT #920 _(PARk_a ESCROW PAID MAY 21,1980 225.00 ,'LARSON & MERTZ July 1980 Research on J. Smith petition for creation of tax increment district in Park I on 7-30 and 7-31 incl-tiding review of Minn- esota Chapters 472A and 273 and Annotations, conf, w/atty Holnx-S and draft report to City Council:. 719 F40 SCHOELL & MADSON June I thru July-31, 1980 Meeting .4 Ilms @ 40.00 160.00 ..,LARSON & MERTZ-August 1980, Conf on 8-4 w/Bond Counsel re opinion as to whether property As "built up" pursuant to statute; attend Council- meeting on 8-4 re proposed project.- 79.00 -23 733.40 BALANCE DUE 9 L 9E A. 0 -50- c, SUBDIVISION PLAN CASE NO. SUB._ City of Chanhassen Carver and Hennepin Counties, Minnesota APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application Escrow Paid Date Received by Applicant Name: Korsunsky Krank Erickson Architects, Inc. Address: 555 Shelard:Tow6r, 600 South County -Road 18, Minneapo'lis, Minnesota 55426 Number and Street City State . Zip Code Owner. Gabbert & Gabbert Company Address: 3510 West 70th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55435 Number -and Street City State Zip Code Address of property in question: Legal description of property in question: Park One - Outlot A & IJ: SW 1/4 of Section 7,.T116, R22, lying easterly of the west 1410.4 ft., measured at a right angle to the west line of said SW 1/4, and lyi southerly of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railrod right-of-way. I, - Present zoning of property: Planned Industrial District Present use of property: Vacant Proposed use of property: Light Industry The following documents if appropriate shall be attached to this application: 1. Sketch Plan 2. Preliminary Plat 3. Escrow Account Date Received Initial ! _ f 1� -51- Date Received Initial 4. Abstractor's Certificate 5. Final Plat I hereby declare that all statements made in this application and on the attached documents are true, and that I shall reimburse the City for all expenses incurred in processing this application for sub- division. Sign ure of Applicant See attached letter Sicrnature of Owner May 19., 1980 )ate Received by Title Dat (Following to be completed by Zoning Administrator or City Official) CHRONOLOGY -DATE BY Sketch Plan on Planning Commission Agenda Planning Commission Postponed to Preliminary Plat on Planning C6mmission Agenda Planning Commission Postponed to Newspaper Publication Adjacent Property Owners Notified Public Hearing Planning Commission Action Preliminary Plat on Council Agenda Council Postponed to Council Action - Final Plat on Planning Commission Agenda Planning Commission Postponed to Planning Commission Action Final Plat on Council Agenda Council Postponed to Council Action Final Contract Executed Escrow Returned - Amount. m f PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (Preliminary Plat) On this day of 19 , this preliminary plat was recommended for (approval) , fdisapproval) subject to the following conditions: Chairman of Planning. Commission _ Action by City - Preliminary Plat On this .day of 19 , the Chanhassen City Council, Carver and Hennepin Counties, Minnesota (approved), (disapproved) this Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions: Attest: City Administrator By order of the Chanhassen City Council e PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION - Final Plat On this day of 19 , this Final Plat was recommended for (approval), (disapproval) subject to the following conditions: Chairman of Planning Commission Action by City - Final Plat On this day of 19 , the Chanhassen City Council, Carver and Hennepin Counties, Minnesota (approved), (disapproved) this Final Plat subject to the following conditions: By order of the Chanhassen. City Council Mayor Attest: City Administrator 7-)--)S' Gabbert & Beck n' 3510 WEST 7OTH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 4v (612) 925-4321 May 9, 1980 City of Chanhassen Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attn:,Mr. Robert Waibel RE: PARK ONE, PLAT COMM. #79*-15 Gentlemen; Please be adva sed. that we have reviewwed , the prel;tmr nary plat submitted by Frank Beddor, et. al. platting Outlot B of the Park One plat. We consent to the proposed platting and to the location and dedication of the proposed roads as it is submitted by Mr. Beddor. Sincerely, Warren Beck CC:'Frank Beddor Julius C. Smith rw r ' J — t' KOkSUN;.:` RUM ERICKSON =TS, INC. MAY 14 NO IN THE GALLERIA , 44 KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS. INC. May 19, 1980 Mr. Don Ashworth City Manager City of Chanhassen 7610 Laredo Dr. Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Park One Comm. No. 79-15 Dear Mr. Ashworth: „ra Dr•. r..:7'e� ARCHITECTS / PLANNERS INTERIOR DESIGN I appreciate your informative response to our request for the City to continue the frontage road and utility service within Park One. As you noted, further action could not be taken until the Planning Commission considers this sub- division. We are presently in the process and are scheduled for a public hearing on June 11. You have also forwarded a copy of your letter to Mr. Beddor to me which outlines two different procedures for the installation of these improvements. I cannot advise as to whether or not your assessment of which of the two different procedures we are actually following is correct. It may indeed be the case that Russ Larson. and Jules Smith are preparing a report on the feasibility of a tax increment district for Park One. This is best confirmed by contacting Mr. Beddor. Regardless of which procedure we are following, the subdivision preliminary plat presentation and approval by the Planning Commission appears to be a critical first step, for as you noted it is after this point that the intended use and its financial considerations can be ascertained. Sincerely yours, KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS, INC. (I ) 0 Daryl P. Fortier DPF/gew / POW 198o cc: Frank Beddor, Jr. Cr: rver.)� Jerome Carlson Julius Smith, Attorney at Law �'� q 555 SHELARD TOWER 600 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD 18 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 (612)546-5381 CITY'j \F 7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O. BOX 1470CHANHASSENi MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 May 14, 1980 Instant Web Attn: Mr. Frank Beddor, Jr. 571 West 78th Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Mr. Beddor: Two methods have been discussed during the past year to extend municipal facilities to Park One, i.e. extend tax increment district (similar to creation of an econo.Liic development district), or via extensions which are totally private in nature. The following generally outlines the procedures to be followed for each of these al te.rnat`ive s : I. Extend Tax Increment District or Create Economic Development District - Russ Larson/Jules Smith to report.on feasibility of, and make written procedural findings and recommendations. - Housing and Redevelopment Authority contracts with attorney and planning firm. to: A. Planning Phase 1. Make legal findings for extension or creation. 2. Prepare plan docu:�4nt: a) 5 copa .acid _-s .a Ced cos cpub 1 ic_mor� b) Value of new construction_ c) Timing. d) Boundaries of district. e) Financial models. f) Incorporate legal findings: fir. Frank Beddor -2- ~� May 14, 19$0 3. Plan document reviewed by Planning Commission and other agencies (School District, County, etc_) after necessary hearings ordered. 4. City Council hears plan amendment including HRA/ Planning Commission/other agency recommendations. B. Plan Implementation 1. Developer initiates rezoning application(s) and platting considered and approved by Planning Commission and City -Council. 2. Development proposals received and Planning Commission/Council hears and acts on such plan. 3. Feasibility Studies ordered and public improvement hearings held. C. Construction Phase 1. Plans and specifications and contracts awarded for.public improvements. 2. Private construction commences. I.E. Private Development Proposals A. Developer initiates rezoning and subdivision. B. Planning Commission hears request including required documentation for drainage, utilities, lot sizes, use, etc. including other public body reviews and recommendations (Park and Recreation, watershed District, etc.) C. City Council acts on Planning Commission recommendations and information including: 1. Authorizes rezoning. 2. Approvessubdivision. 3. Authorizes preparation of development contract outlining developer responsibilities, conditions of approval, etc. 4. Authorizes preparation of final plat. 5. Authorizes extension of streets, utilities; etc.. as: a) Private extension of public improvements wherein - developer prepares plans and specifications; city engineer reviews and authorizes such; developer lets contract and establishes financial guarantees to insure completion in accordance with city standards and the city engineer stakes and inspects improvements Mr-.1 Frank Beddor -3- r,01) May 14 , 1980 b) The City carries out street/utility extensions of public improvements. 1) City agrees to such after approval of financial guarantees and necessary escrow deposits. 2) Feasibility study initiated. 3) Public hearing held on scope of improvement, proposed costs/assessments, etc. 4) City engineer prepares plans and specifications and advertises for bids. 5) City awards construction. 6) City engineer stakes and inspects. 7) City assesses benef.itting property cost of improvements after holding necessary hearings. Both of the alternatives presented in this memorandum, "Creation of Economic Development District" and "Private Development Proposals" accomplish the same ends - development of lands in accordance with City requirements_ Specifically, a tax increment district or economic development district is established because such development would not or could not occ�.r without creation of such a district. These are the findings that werc rude approximately 3 years ago when the business park was developed. The advantages of the tax increment district or economic development district would typically be -t_hat the improvements would be paid by the new taxes created by develop -rent within that district. It additionally has advantages to the City to insure .that improvements/facilities/pl.anning are able to be accomplished on a broader basis than one singular develop- ment, i.e. signalization, major collector street construction, bridge construction, park improvements, etc. The disadvantage of this type of district is time requirements to complete the numerous hearings and to make the findings required by law. In light of the above comments, it is the belief of this office that the Park I development is proceeding as a Private Development Proposal". 'I find. it difficult to believe that the attorneys can still make their findings that the tax increment or economic development district is warrantee given current status of Park. I, i.e. your application for rezoning, extension of utilities, subdivision, etc. Mr. Smith has stated that he ma d.n a-pplica- 4 do to the Cite% to have 1?ark I considered as an econoInio ,�- _ ... r C O it i tt," �O =r�L� ? 1 a" "� �IJi. Additionally, assuming -that this was solely a petiLien for this type o district, I do not consider such to represent the request that I have attempted to continually state, i.e. "Russ Larson/Jules Smith to report on feasibility of and make written, procedural findings and recommendations" regarding whether Park I could be considered as art extension increment district or as an economic development district. in this regard, I know that you have had frustrations with t more specifically myself, in regards to obtaining answers t of the tax . Additionally, he City, and o questions O Mr.'Frank Beddor -4- May 14, 1980 and expediting the overall redevelopment process. I will not apologize for any actions taken by myself in this process. I sincerely believe that the City has accomplished a great deal during the past 3-year period. When I volunteered as executive director for the HRA, I did so recognizing the potential benefits to the City by such a program. — I continue to believe that the redevelopment efforts can be of significant benefit to both the City, existing businesses, and our citizens. However, the job as executive director continues to take time away from the job for which.I was hired, i.e. City Manager responsible to carry out the administration of the City and to advise the City Council in regards to policy matters. All of the correspondence, letters (such as this), meetings, etc. are primarily carried out on my own time. However, I am unable to co��:plete major jobs for which I am responsible, i.e. preparation of the budget, salary and personnel administration, day-to- day operations of the City, etc. No where in the job description for my position is there any mention of administrative staff support to or for the HRA. It is for this reason that I have previously asked to be ra-inved from the position and have recommended that the HRA hire additional personnel for this position. Their problem has been one of not having legal authority, or fund4 to carry out this type of function. Hopefully, with the support of yourself and by adoption of the plan by the City Council, this reco_amendation can be accomplished. I will place this item, on the May 20th agenda. Don Ashworth City Manager DA:k J• / � J r� JULIUS C. SMITH Attorney at Law 215 YORKTOWN OFFICE COURT 7101 YORK AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55435 (612) 831-8530 May 13, 1980 Mr. Robert Waibel Assistant City Manager City of Chanhassen 7610 Laredo Drive Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Park One Dear Mr. Waibel: Pursuant to Chanhassen Ordinance No. 33, Section 6.01(e) , we are herewith providing the names and mailing addresses of the owners of all land within 200 feet of the boundaries of the preliminary replat of Park One: NAME (1) Henry C . Dimler (2) Henry A. Kerber, et al (3) MTS Systems Corporation (4) Charles E. Kerber, et al (5) Eden 5000 Properties ADDRESS �500 France Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 2600 Arboretum Boulevard Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 PO Box 24012 Minneapolis , Minnesota 55424 18811 Arboretum Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 900 Midland Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (6) Annie Picha c/o Perbix Harvey & Simons PO Box 190 Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 MAY 1980 MCEMM VILLAGE US QkA4qHA" ti May 13, 1980 Mr. Robert Waibel PAGE TWO (7) Lyman Lumber Company (8) Gabbert and Gabbert Company PO Box 9 0 Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 35-10 West 70th Street Edina, Minnesota 55435 (9) Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul c/o C.T. Corporation System, Inc. and Pacific Railroad Company 1032 Midland Bank Building 405 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (10) State of Minnesota Transportation Building Department of Transportation St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Please give me a call if you have any questions. Your., very truly, ulius C . Srifith % nw j / 1 J CITY J F CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE,, P 0. BOX 147*CHANHASSEN, MINN ESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Land Use Coordinator, Bob Waibel DATE: May 12, 1980 SUBJ: Sketch Plan Review, Park One APPLICANT: Frank Beddor PLANNING CASE: P-649 PPtitinn The applicant is requesting to replat the northerly portion of Park One (indicated as lots A and B on the attached sketch) into two industrial building sites and one outlot. Backqround 1.. Community Location: As shown in enclosure I, the subject property is located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of 184th Street and the Chicago Milwaukee St. Paul and Pacific Railroad right - of -way. _ 2. -Existing.. Zoning: The subject property is presently zoned P-4, Planned Industrial. District. 3. Utilities''.;:�-xPursuant to the trunk water and sewer -'service area maps dated Apr-1,1978, the subject property is available to sanitary sewer and water. The present terminus of the nearest sewer and water service is located in the north/south street west of Reply Systems, Inc. to a point approximately 100 feet north of Reply Systems_ 4. Comprehensive Plan Proposals: a. Land Use: Pursuant to the adopted City Comprehensive Guide Plan, the subject property is to assume and maintain an industrial. identity. b. Transportation: The adopted Thoroughfares and Transportation Plan does not indicate any interior street system for the subject property. It is anticipated that the street running north and south along the southwestern border of Park I and bisecting Park I on an east/west alignment will function as a minor collector frontage road. Planning Report -2- ^' May 12, 1980 Comments As shown in the attached materials, a similar request was before the Planning Commission in October, 1979, to consider a site plan review and a replat on the subject property. In this most recent submission of plans for review by the applicant, it has been requested that only subdivision be considered at this time and that site plan review will in all likelihood be carried out sometime in the future. In doing the initial review of the subject proposal last fall, this office felt there were no problems with the subdivision as generally proposed since the most determining factor waswherethe placement of the interior street would be. For sketch plan purposes, this office felt that the street was, in all probability, located in the most acceptable alignment due to the surrounding terrain and physiography, however, the applicant should be aware that depending upon how ownership is ultimately configured, there may be a propensity for this area to require further replatting. Additionally, the Planning Commission should advise the applicant that the present review is only pertinent to the subdivision request and that the building data on the attached sheets is totally dependent upon its feasibility on a detailed basis with the configuration of the subdivision coming forth from this process. Recommendation On a sketch plan basis, I find that the proposal is consistent with the City's plans, policies and ordinances, and recommend that the Planning Commission encourage the applicant to prepare preliminary plat information in accordance with sections 7 and 8 of ordinance 33. Gabbert & Beck 3510 WEST 7OTH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 (612) 925-4321 May 9, 1980 City of Chanhassen Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attn: Mr. Robert Wai,bel RE: PARK ONE, PLAT COMM. #79*-15 Gentlemen: Please be advised that we have reviewed the preliminary, plat submitted by. Frank Beddor, et. al. platting Outlot B of the Park One plat. We consent to the proposed platting and to the location and dedication of the proposed roads as it is submitted by Mr. Beddor. Si cerely, Wa ren Beck CC: Frank Beddor Julius C. Smith �111213JAI MAY 1990 S�s"r RECEIVED vILLAGE OF � C"NHASSEN, A MINN. r7' IN THE GALLERIA V, W May 9, 1980 CITY OF' WOV, eX ��s` -. .E� _l, �i�", f F L: t ' r it, �. } WY11: 7610 LAREDO DRIVEoP.O. BOX 147oCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 � Korsunsky Krank Erickson Architects, Inc. Attn: Mr. Daryl P. Fortier 555 Shelard Tower 600 South County Road 18 Minneapolis, MST 55426 Dear Mr. Fortier: I am in reciept of your letter of May 6, 1980. Although this letter can be kept on file in regards to the request to "continue the frontage road and utility services" within park I, such cannot -be further considered until after or as a part of City Council approval of the preliminary plat. The reason for such is obvious, i.e. the City nor the developer can reasonably proceed with installation of improvements without knowledge as to where such are to be placed or why. I am enclosing a copy of a rough outline of procedures to be followed in installation of public improvements within a tax increment district (economic development district) versus private development. This outline was developed solely to give Mr. Beddor an overview of the two processes and should not be considered to be totally conclusive of all agencies requiring review of the development, public hearing requirements, etc. It is your responsibility, as a professional advisor for Mr. Beddor, to insure that development requirements, as outlined in the City.subdivision and platting ordinances, are complied with. As you will note from the outline, you are presently at II A. A decision as to how public improvements are to be installed, i.e_ c > i Sri va-t_v �_ �Z j r,' Uf as U t S t e, p II C- I am attacking~ a copy of a letter sent to ldr. McRostie, representing Bloomberg Companies, wherein after receiving preliminary plat approval for_ their subdivision, they desired to proceed with a request to have improvements publicly installed. Hopefully, this letter outlines requirements of -the developer after approval of the preliminary plat and assuming that the developer wishes to proceed with streets, utilities, as a public improvement project. err. Daryl Fortier '1 -2- May 9, 1980 Should you have any questions in regards to this letter, please feel free to contact me. kk Since ly, Don Ashworth City Manager DA:k Enclosure KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS. INC. May 6, 1980 Don Ashworth, City Manager City of Chanhassen 7610 Laredo Dr. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Park One Comm. No. 79-15 Dear Don: ARCHITECTS / PLANNERS INTERIOR DESIGN We have been requested to proceed with the subdivision of Park One, and have submitted to Bob Waibel, the necessary prints for an informal sketch plan review on May 14. We shall then be proceeding to preliminary and final plat approvals. We herein request that the City continue the frontage road and utility services as required for this project. Sincerely yours, KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS, INC. 04— W-O4 Daryl P. Fortier DPF/gew cc: Frank Beddor, Jr. Jerome Carlson Jules Smith, Attorney at Law S' VlL1-AQ'E SEN, d: CHAb1HA=� 555 SHELARD TOWER 600 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD 18 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 (612)546-5381 KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS. INC. April 30, 1980 Bob Waibel, Assistant City Planner City of Chanhassen 7610 Laredo Dr. Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Park One Comm. No. 79-15 ARCHITECTS / PLANNERS INTERIOR DESIGN As you recall, we submitted a sketch plan review for the Instant Web, Inc. building at the Park One location this past fall. We are now interested, in pursuing this matter and securing a replat of the existing subdivision. As there has been a substantial change in the make-up of the Planning Commission, it is our intent to resubmit an informal sketch plan review for May 14, 1980. Attached for your use are eight (8) sets of drawings. It is our intent to proceed to the May 28, 1980 Planning Commission meeting with an application to replat Outlot 'A' of Park One. We will replat this into Block 2, Lots 1 and 2 and Outlot 'A'. Our plans presently show multiple buildings and what will become Lot 1 and Lot 2. As we do not know which buildings will be constructed, nor who the tenants will be, we are merely seeking replat approval and not building or site plan approval. We will be asking the City of Chanhassen to continue the frontage road to Highway 5 and the roads shown to serve Park One. These improvements should include all utilities. I will be in your office on Monday, May 5, 1980, to further discuss this project. Sincerely yours, KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS, INC. Daryl Fortier DPF/gew cc: Frank Beddor, Jr. Jerome Carlson Warren Beck Julius Smith,Attorney 555SHELARD TOWER 600 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD 18 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 (612)546-5381 A INC. WEB SPECIALISTS Mr. Don Ashworth CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 Laredo Drive Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Don: 571 WEST 78TH STREET CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (612) 474-1151 April 24, 1980 It is Jerome's and my understanding that you feel you could do a lot more for Instant Web if we moved into the current tax increment area, specifically Park Two (formerly Schmieg property), rather than to Park One. Jerome and I again want to restate our request that you give us a written list of all of the advantages of our moving into Park Two. We have requested this many times verbally and in writing. It is of utmost importance to us that we receive this information so we may make an intelligent decision on a businesslike basis on where we locate Instant Web. Don, we would also like to know who we should talk to for the answers to the list of questions which we submitted to you and the City Council on April 11, 1980. Another question that was not included on this .list is how does Instant Web get compensated for their increased cost -in taxes over the next 4 or 5 years which we will incur being forced to move 4 or 5 years ahead of our time schedule. Those taxes are currently estimated at $630,000 to $850,000. Don, I feel that these questions are the same questions that any other businessman in Chanhassen will ask who is being forced to relocate. If we can find out who to talk to, I feel that it would save a lot of your time and ours. Continued ... ijuol/j APR 1980 RECEIVED VILLAGE OF, CHANHASSIKN, :, MINN, G April 24, 1980 Mr. Don Ashworth Page Two Again, I would appreciate it if you could make up a list of advantages of our moving to Park Two vs. Park One. I would also appreciate it if you could send me a letter stating when we can have this list, so we may make an intelligent decision on a new location for Instant Web. FB/d cc/E. Jerome Carlson HRA Board Members Chanhassen City Council Planning Commission Russ Larson Craig Mertz Bob:WaibelJ Mark Koegler Jules Smith Lawrence B. Carlson Dennis Spalla Herb Bloomberg Bill McRostie Peter Jarvis Bill Von Klug Sincerely, INSTANT WEB, INC. Ia e Wdr ,Ji. 0�1 3:J %A�✓sZ �/ C.11.i1�', i�:'`!?�t �\ .?� �lt S �_):3'a3ti. Gubbert & Leck 3F10 West 70th street Edina, "iinr:esota. 55435 1,tt:i: harry Koechel In reply refer to: Per;^�i.t Na. 5•!Z-73-65 C.S.7,701, T.I1. 5 Loc; 0. 75 mile East of T.H, 1.01 Dear M.C. Koecne _ . r�s A R 1980 RECEIVED82 ' VILLAGE Or CHANHASSE#� .,� !_ MINN, the T'CT770T :las reviewed your request, in your i tT;e.r dated February 21, 1980, to -Lease inplace the temperary access authorized by the atove referenced ;_:_Coss permit. The. access wou.id be used by City of Chanr_lasrsen Fire Ileriartm_:,rt venicleS, and .could be restricted from use by the other vel-�.icle;s by a narma,-;�_r,�- ;�:,�t anr� Chain riarri F_^, vie feel yot r r;roposai is acceptable subject to the folluaing chaLLage: _.r, the desi�r of the emergency access, and the location of the barrier. 1.) The width of the access shall be reduced to 18 feet. 2.) 1he turning radii shall be 10 feet. 3.) The post and chain barrier small be placed 22 feet back from the outside edge of the pavement of T.H. 5. 4.) The access driving surface shall consist of :rya-teriai that will support turf, matching that of the surrounding area. 5.) xll dis5urbed areas be restored to match surroLLnding Ycadi7�3, c;fjn- tours and turf. 1, laile revie ring t'rle area in the field, I observed three vel:iicles using the inplace access to travel from the service road to T.H. 5. These vehicles easily drove around the inplace barricades. Either more barricades need to be placed. or the inplace barricades relocated -'Co prevent the use of the access. Please take care of this ss soon as possible. After the access is reconstructed. the barrier installed, and the restoration completed, please notify our office for a final inspection. Tf you or the City of Charinas,-en have any questions Teel free to conta::t eitl;er Jack Reichel or myself at 54 -3751. 'Sine(,rely, / %3 Thorrias J. Ailcde 'le Senior Permit Tech�icia� An c';c ua1 0 1or;wi:.>y 1- 4"�l y MEMORANDUM CITY OF c 7610 LAREDO DRIVE*P.O BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 DATE: February 22, 1980 TO: Land Use Coordinator, Bob waibel FROM: City Fire Marshal, Mark Littfin SUBJ: Chained Access Road to the Press Regarding the emergency access to the Press building, the chained barrier is allowable as long as the padlock on the chain is keyed to the City's master key. Gabbert & Beck 3510 WEST 70TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 16121925-4321 February 21, 1980 Mr. John B.': Reichel Roadway Regulations Supervisor Minnesota Department of Transportation 2055 No. Lilac Drive Golden Valley, MN 55422 RE.: Access Driveway Permit #5AD-78-65 Dear Mr. Reichel: Enclosed is a plan/detail of the permanent barricade which we propose to install in order to maintain a emergency driveway access into our Chanhassen property. This driveway is proposed mainly to allow emergency access into our site and adjacent sites for the Chanhassen Fire Department. Presently, our firm has $500.00 deposit with your department to be released after our removal of this entrance. We are hereby requesting that you allow this entrance to remain and release our deposit after installation of the barricade. Please review and advise if this is satisfactory. Thank you. Sincerely, Larry Koecnel Project Manager Bob Kai acc Kreger Jim Orr IN THE GALLERIA f bl \11 r v--- % 3 cz-/. Gabbert & Beck 3510 WEST 70TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 (6121 925-4321 February 20, 1980 Mr. Robert Weibel City of Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota Dear Bob: We have reviewed the form of the proposed contract amend- ments for the Reply Systems addition to The Press building in Chanhassen. The form of the contract changes are sat- isfactory to us. I understand that the Council will consider the contract amendment in their March 3rd meeting. Sincerely, i 4wrren Beck IN THE GALLERIA CITY OF ,30- 7610 LAREDO DRIVE®P.O. BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 MEMORANDUM DATE: February 4, 1980 TO: City Manager, Don Ashworth FROM: Land Use Coordinator, Bob Waibel SUBJ: Gabbert and Gabbert Development Contract Amendment (Reply Systems, Inc.) PLANNING CASE: P-425 I have gone through the attached development contract amendment and recommend that it be adopted. The applicant has been notified to complete the screening of the rooftop equipment, as mentioned in the Assistant City Attorney's cover letter, on the first phase as well as the Reply Systems addition. t Ac�r; by City A I INC. WEB SPECIALISTS January 23, 1980 Mr. Ed Dunn Dunn & Curry Real Estate Management Inc. 4940 Viking Drive Pentagon Office Park Minneapolis, MN 55435 Dear Ed: 571 WEST 78TH STREET CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (612) 474-1151 Instant Web has retained the services of Arnie Hed to develop the Chanhassen Plan. I am enclosing a plot plan that goes from the City limits of Chanhassen down to Old Hwy. 17 and on this plan we want Arnie Hed to have drawn in all of the future expansion we are looking at in this area (of which Lake Susan is a major part). We will have this done in full color and then we hope to print this and pass it out to businesses and other interested parties. Along with this printed plan we want to have a booklet which outlines all advantages for people interested in moving their business and/or relocating their homes in the Chanhassen area. My wife, Marilyn, who is a stockholder, director and Vice President of The Press, Inc. will be working with Arnie on this project and I would appreciate your setting up a meeting with your key people and Marilyn and Arnie so they could go over our plans. I am asking Arnie Hed to set up this meeting with you. Sincerely, l s/ Frank Beddor, Jr. FB:djl cc: Jerome Carlson Marilyn-Reddor Arnie Hed Bob Waibel $2T28� JANIM u � RECEIVED �a VILLAGE aR CHANHASSEN, MINN. cl�� .r'^'...-'L°'s1L'..::ss."4a,.Yr—�ri�lir�.iZ-�rrei �irai�eaNd4.a.�:7�Aiw.+l+aAnrt->tu.u.-s:,y.a.�-— �-'4�._+.i-1s..L•...�-- - -,,.�..•}-. a.�.t _-c� a _ LARsoW & l�TExacz ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING RUSSELL H. LARSON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE CRAIG M. MERTZ (6t2) 335-9565• January 21, 1980 OF COUNSEL HARVEY E. SKAAR MARK C. McCULLOUGH Mr. Bob Waibel Chanhassen City Planner P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Mn. 55317 Re: Reply Systems, Inc. Dear Bob: Enclosed for your review is the proposed Amendment to the Gabbert and Gabbert Company Development Contract. If the transcription of the September 4, 1979 City Council Minutes is correct, the amended plan was approved without a provision regarding parking or the posting of "no parking" signs on the frontage road. Thus, the amended devel- opment contract does not mention parking. It should be noted that paragraph 12 of the original development contract requires the screening of roof top equipment. This has not yet been done on The Press Building. If the amendment to the development contract is in order, please arrange to have it placed on the consent agenda. Please call if you have any questions or changes. A :10 JAN1J CMML : s as �- VILLAGE OF Enclosure CMANHASSEV, �' MINN. �C Very truly yours, Craig M. Mertz CITY DF CHASHASS N 7610 LAREDO DRIVE*P.O. BOX 147eCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 January 17, 1980 Gabbert and Beck Attn: Mr. Larry Koeschel 3510 West 70th Street Edina, 14N 55435 Re: Temporary Access on Highway 5, City of Chanhassen Dear Mr. Koeschel: Approval of the lot division and, plans for the "Press" were contingent upon access to the property be received via a frontage road to the property. The driveway on the property was allowed to continue to be used during construction of the Press and until such time as the frontage road became operational.. As you are aware, the city did proceed with construction of the frontage road and such is now operational. It is the understanding of this office that you have carried out discussions with city staff regarding the conversion of the temporary access into an emergency access. I would suggest that your firm prepare and submit plans, as per the request of the Minnesota Depart- ment of Transportation, for barricades for said emergency access purpose. A copy of,.plans prepared should. be submitted to the City for review by the -City engineer and fire..chief. Upon receipt of approvals from;-:_the.,:.above mentioned persons, your firm should arrange for and complete the construction of -said barricade. If you have any -.;.questions in regards to the access.and/or barricade, you should contact eithe-r-Bob Waibel, Land Use Coordinator for the city or Jim Orr, the city's consulting engineer. Sincerel,., , Don Ashworth City Manager cc: Bob Waibel, Land Use Coordinator Schoell and Madson, Attn: Jim Orr Fire Chief, Jack Kreger DA:k CITY bF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE*P.O. BOX 1479CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 January",15, 1980 Mr. Larry Xpeschel Gabbert & B ck 3510 W. 70th St. Edina, Mn. 435 Re: Temporary \Acc Dear Mr. Koes ess on Highway 5 Attached please find a copy of the city council minutes of February 5, 1979 wherein the city council approved the subdivision of Park I on the consent agenda. Additionally attached is the staff recommendation.which accompanied this agenda item and which was subsequently adopited as the conditions of approval. These items along with the recent discussions between yourself and city staff regarding the cori,ersion of the temporary access into an emergency, access, I fin that the appropriate action would be for your firm to prepare,and submit plans as per the request of MnDOT for a barricade for paid emergency access purpose. A copy of such plans should additionally be submitted to the city for review of the city engineerNand fire chief. Upon receipt of approvals from the above men coned persons, your firm should arrange for and complete the onstruction of said barricade. l If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, l CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE9P.0 BOX 147*CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 DATE: October 26, 1979 TO: Bob Waibel, Ass't. City Manager/LUC FROM: Mark Littfin, City Fire Marshal SUBJ: Instant Web Regarding the proposed Instant Web blueprints, recommendation is as follows: 1. Proper exiting as per Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire Code. 2. Fire apparatus accessibility to rear of building. 3. Determining class building and occupant load. WILLIAM D. SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON JACK T. VOSLER JAMES R. ORR HAROLD E. DAHLIN LARRY L. HANSON RAYMOND J. JACKSON WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY JACK E. GILL RODNEY 8. GOROON THEODORE D. KEMNA JOHN W.EMOND KENNETH E. ADOLF WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT BRUCE C. SUNDING R. SCOTT HARRI DENNIS W. SAARI GERALD L. BACKMAN SCHOELL 111, MADSON, INC. ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS i (6121 938-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343 City of Chanhassen c/o Mr. Don Ashworth, City Manager P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Subject: Gentlemen: OFFICES AT HURON, SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON, TEXAS October 29, 1979 The Press Problems. Pursuant to your request, we herein wish to report on the above -named problems. A letter from Korsuns.ky, Krank, Erickson, Architects, dated September 24, 1979, claimed damages to their driveway caused by a watermain break.. Upon further investigation and meetings with The Press President, we are of the opinion that their driveway and truck loading ramp were underdesigned, and that the watermain break had nothing to do with the driveway failure. Apparently Korsunsky, etc., agree as they are assuming financial responsibility for the failure according to Daryl Fortier. That would seemingly settle that issue in terms of City involvement. Concerning the easements for the storm sewer, same was earlier transmitted to you in an executed form. Very truly yours, SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. JROrr:bk cc: mr. Russell H. Larson, Attorney OCT 1979 cP Rec, ONED c VUAae of a � Aft �� LARSON SAC MERTZ ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING RUSSELL H. LARSON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 CRAIG M. MERTZ OF COUNSEL October 26, 1979 HARVEY E. SKAAR MARK C. McCULLOUGH Donald W. Ashworth Chanhassen City Manager Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Highway #5 Frontage Road Dear Don: TELEPHONE (612) 335-9565 We have received the two easement deeds which you forwarded to us from Schoell & Madson for the storm water easement across the Gabbert and Gabbert Company property. The acquisition of the two easements resolves the matter described in our letter of September 19, 1979. The possibility remains, however, that Gabbert and Gabbert Company might pursue a claim for damage to the bituminous parking lot as described in Mr. Fortier's letter of September 24, 1979. A copy of that letter is enclosed. You apparently have already informed the City's liability carrier of this potential claim, inasmuch as we have received inquiries regarding this matter from Home Insurance. We still recommend that the City notify the general contractor's liability insurance carrier. That can be done by forwarding a copy of Mr. Fortier's letter to the general contractor's liability insurance carrier. CMM:mep Encl. ry truly yours, CRAIG M. MERTZ Assistant Chanhassen City Attorney OCT 1973 N CAVED i-LaGE OP cr, C"A 11 CITY OF r "r 7610 LAREDO DRIVE®P.O. BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 October 26, 1979 Korsunsky, Krank, Erickson Architects, Inc. Attn: Daryl Fortier 555 Shelard Tower 600 South County Road 18 Minneapolis, MN 55426 Dear Daryl: Attached please find a copy of the application for consideration of planning request for the Instant Web proposal in Park I. For the planning file on this request, we will need to have the application completed with the applicant and owners signatures. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, g�-� Bob Waibel Asst. Manager/Land Use Coordinator BW:k I PLANNING REPORT CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O BOX 1479CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 DATE: October 22, 1979 TO: Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Ass't. City Manager/LUC, Bob Waibel SUBJ: Site Plan Review, Replat Sketch Plan Review, Park I APPLICANT: Instant Web PLANNING CASE: P-649 Petition The applicant is proposing to construct an approximate 236,600 sq. ft. office/production and warehousing facility on a parcel approximately 10.2 acres in size. Pursuant to City ordinances, said request is subject to site plan, and replat sketch plan review. Background 1. Community Location: As shown in enclosure 1, the subject property is located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of 184th Street and the Chicago Milwaukee St. Paul and Pacific Railroad right- of-way. 2. Existing Zoning: The subject property is presently zoned P-4, Planned Industrial District. 3. Utilities: Pursuant to the trunk water and sewer service area maps dated April 1978, the subject property is available to sanitary sewer and water. The present terminus of the nearest sewer and water service is located in the north/south street west of Reply Systems, Inc. to a point approximately 100 feet north of Reply Systems. 4. Comprehensive Plan Proposals: a. Land Use: Pursuant to the adopted City Comprehensive Guide Plan, the subject property is to assume and maintain an industrial identity. b. Transportation: The adopted Thoroughfares and Transportation Plan does not indicate any interior street system for the subject property. It is anticipated that the street running north and south along the southwestern border of Park I and bisecting Park I on an east/west alignment will function as a minor collector frontage road. Planning Report -2- October 22, 1979 rnmments As indicated in Mr. Fortier's letter of October 9, 1979, the first phase of construction would entail a building with 117,000 sq. ft. of ground floor area with a total floor area of 133,600 sq. f t. You will note from page 4 of the attached plans, that the proposed structure is to be constructed into the terrain on the north side for more efficient energy application. Because of the possibility that the existing Instant Web facility located in the Animal Faire building will undergo imminent use change relative to the downtown redevelopment project, and that there has been extensive grading of the proposed streets as shown in the attached plans, the applicant is requesting that site plan review be carried out at this time. Since there is the possibility of a use change decision for the existing Instant Web facility early next year, and that the replat process could take as much as two months, Staff believes that review at this time would be timely so as not to potentially delay the redevelopment project. As previously mentioned, there has been significant grading of the interior streets that are shown on the attached plans. Whether or not this has been a violation of the City Excavation Ordinance has not yet been determined, however this office feels that the circulation system proposed and subsequently graded, is in all probability the most acceptable alignment for this portion of Park I. As found in previous planning reports for development proposals in P-4 districts, the Zoning Ordinance is silent in regards to setback, and parking requirements as well as other standards and requirements. You will note in the attached plans, that the applicant is proposing 75 parking spaces with two truck loading zones for the first phase of the development and also a 20-foot rear yard setback. With regard to the rear yard setback, this office has no problem with the proposal due to the proposed above -ground height of the rear wall being less. than 4 feet. However, the applicant should aprise himself as to what effect this setback may have to any future plans of constructing rail- road spur access. With regard to the 75 spaces proposed, this office would request that the applicant furnish the planning commission and staff with detailed employment projections for the first phase. You will note that on sheet 1 of the attached plans, the first phase truck loading areas are to be moved to the front of the building as well as all of the other truck loading areas for the ultimate construc- tion, and that the road right-of-way encroaches considerably on the ultimate parking in the vicinity of building "f" Lot B. Due to these above conditions, and the uncertainty as to the potential parking needs for the ultimate facilities, I would recommend that the Planning Commission consider the condition that parking be restricted to the areas so designated on the site plans. From the plans presented, it is apparent that the applicant is proposing -to replat Lots "a" and "B" at this time. The applicant should enter into the record at this time what his immediate replat intentions are. Upon the statement of replat intentions, this office, finding that the attached plans are adequate for sketch plan review, recommends that the Planning Commission advise the applicant to prepare a preliminary plat in accordance with Sections 6, 7, and 8 of Subdivision Ordinance 33. Planning Report -1 -3- _ October 22, 1979 The Planning Commission at this time should restrict their comments to the proposals compliance with the city's ordinance plans, policies, and ordinances. This office recommends that the Planning Commission defer site plan decision until more definitive information is available on the following: 1. The first phase and ultimate employment projections. 2. The preliminary plat. 3. Utility service plans. Additionally, the applicant should post an escrow with the City Treasurer's office in the amount of $2,000.00 to defray staff costs in processing this application. r WILLIAM D. SCHOELL / CARLISLE MADSON JACK T. VOSLER JAMES R. ORR HAROLD E. DAHLIN LARRY L. HANSON RAYMOND J. JACKSON WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY JACK E. GILL RODNEY B. GORDON THEODORE D. KEMNA JOHN W.EMOND KENNETH E. ADOLF WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT BRUCE C. SUNOING R. SCOTT HARRI DENNIS W. SAARI GERALD L. BACKMAN SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC. ENGINEERS ANO SURVEYORS (6121 93B-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343 City of Chanhassen c/o Mr. Don Ashworth, Manager P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Gentlemen.: OFFICES AT HURON, SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON, TEXAS October 18, 1979 Subject: The Press Easements. Enclosed are copies of storm sewer easements obtained from the Press and Gabbert & Gabbert Company. This relates to the storm sewer and ditch in front of their building. Also attached is a color -coded location map. Very truly yours, CHOELL & MADSON, INC. JROrr:bk enclosures cc: Mr. Craig Mertz Larson & Mertz -.. t.y .F�•-r _�a��x+.. yY _—_--��-.�_..�...«�.. �...�_....v�. era' .. - � ..Y^w•.t .-. .., •max - .__ .- .--... .... .. .�.+re._.-_... a CITY OF 7610 LAREDO DRIVE®P.O. BOX 147eCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 October 15, 1979 Instant Webb Attn: Frank Beddor, Jr. 571 West 78th Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Mr. Beddor: Pursuant to our previous discussions, I am placing review of site plan considerations for Park I on the City Planning Commission agenda for their next meeting on October 24, 1979. This review will encompass a replat of the existing parcel. Pursuant to previous notifications given to you, extensive site alterations have occurred on the property, i.e. removal of trees and earth moving. This is in violation of the City's excavation ordinances. in discussions between Daryl Fortier (your architectural representative), Bob Obermeyer (Engineer - Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District) and myself, it was determined to be prudent that stabilization of disturbed areas should occur immediately to insure. that erosion did not occur on the property. You should proceed immediately with such erosion control measures as outlined by the Watershed District. In regards to whether the violation of the excavation ordinance has hampered Planning Commission/City Council review of replat considerations- and/or whether any penalties should be established for such will.be left to the Planning Commission and City Council during discussion of site plan reviewandreplatting.''- Again, I would suggest that you note, during Planning Commission/City Council consideration of replatting, that it is not your intent to in any way violate. or supersede City ordinances in regards to your development plans for the property. ' Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, W , Bob Waibel Asst. Manager/Land Use Coordinator KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS. INC. ARCHITECTS / PLANNERS INTERIOR DESIGN October 9, 1979 Mr. Bob Wiabel Assistant City Planner 7610 Laredo Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Park One Comm. No. 79-15 Dear Bob: I am writing this letter to further clarify some of the concerns on Park One. This letter should become part of our submission to the Planning Commission and City Council. Park One is presently owned by Gabbert 6 Gabbert Co. Instant Web Inc. has a contract to purchase this property and is seeking approval for the development as submitted. Park One shall be occupied by light manufacturing, production and warehousing facilities, with related office space. It is the intent of Instant Web Inc. to relocate to Park One and share the new building with United Mailing Inc. As you may know, Instant Web Inc. is a printing firm producing such items as airline ticket jackets, restaurant placemats and similar items. United Mailing Inc. specializes in collating and distributing via mail various pre-printed materials. These two firms will occupy the structure shown on Lot B of Sheet No. A. Firms for the other structures have not been identified at this time. Park One is designed to maintain a sound ecological environment. Natural drainage patterns shall be maintained with increased run off being collected in a sizable ponding area. The pond will settle and filter contaminents as well as control the runoff rate into Eden Prairie. A natural, wooded environment shall be maintained throughout the development with all possible trees being maintained. Roads shall closely follow contours, minimizing tree loss. Structures shall encourage earth sheltering to reduce visual impact, increase energy efficiency, and reduce impermeable surfaces. All landscaping for new buildings shall reinforce the natural environment by using similar trees and ground cover. Sodded areas will be kept to a minimum. Presently we believe all this can happen within the present zoning ordinances without variances. We ask that you review and varify. We also ask that you consider setback standards relative to earth sheltered structures. It does not promote wise land use to required setbacks for essentially underground buildings. A reasonable standard may well be a 2 ft. setback for each foot the structure extends above grade. Thus a totally underground building would be exempt from setbacks. At Park One we would like to set our buildings closer to the rear property lines to allow more open space adjacent to the front of the buildings 555 SHELARD TOWER 600 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD 18 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 (612)546-5381 a Mr. Bob Wiabel 2 and parking areas. October 9, 1979 A timetable for development is somewhat difficult to set. Much of this is due to the development of central Chanhassen where Instant Web Inc. is presently located. Should Instant Web Inc. be requested to relocated, we would need to start construction this winter. Should Instant Web Inc. not be requested to relocate, development may be delayed several years. Regardless of the timetable, we are seeking an excavation and grading permit for Park One to enable work to proceed to assure us that no damage to the site be incurred due to runoff erosion and siltation. Yours truly, KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS, INC. U 9). iyv Daryl Fortier DPF/j l cc: Warren Beck Frank Beddor Jerome Carlson KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS. INC. October 1; 1979 Mr. Frank Beddor Jr. The Press Inc. 18780 W. 78th Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Park One Comm. No. 79-15 Dear Frank: ARCHITECTS / PLANNERS INTERIOR DESIGN As you are aware, we have spent considerable time and effort in creating a number of schemes for the development of Park One. A particular concern has been the extensive earthwork.required for the northern most portion. In June 1978 we began the design process based on typical development criteria or an in ustrial park. The criteria included providing rail access to several potential sites and maintaining building sizes of 25,000 to 150,000 Sq.Ft. in floor area. A particular concern was that a single operation or manufacturer could develop or expand to at least 200,000 Sq.Ft. on a single level. In mid -August, after numerous schemes, we concluded our studies. We had reviewed aerial and topographic surveys, site inspection, soil investigations and watershed requirements. We had explored the constraints of rail access and trucking as well as the Chanhassen and State Building Codes. Our conclusions did not reflect favorably on this site as an industrial park. Among our conclusions were: 1.) Rail access would require a 2% or less grade from the existing track. The site would have to be essentially level with an average elevation of 934 ft. on a site which varies from 942 ft. to. 888 ft. 2.) A relatively flat site would be required to facilitate the sizeable building. 3.) A natural drainage pattern would require very sensitive treatment and extensive storm sewer systems. 4.) Considerable retainage of soils would be required along the Eden Prairie border, requiring concrete walls to about fourteen feet in height. 5.) Fill material was not available on site and large amounts of off site material would be required. This requirement alone would cost about $540,000 or about $23,000 an acre. 6.) A composite, total cost for developing the north 23.4 acres would exceed $750,000 or $30,000 per acre. The above conclusions do not favor development for industrial use and strongly support the contention that this site is blighted due to topographic features. 555 SfELARD TOWER 600 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD 18 MIVNEAPOUS, AhM1FSOTA 55426 (,60546-5381 Mr. Frank Beddor Jr. 2 - October 1, 1979 We were also asked to explore other alternative development standards. This led to the elimination of rail access and accomodating all site work with the available material. Our conclusions here were: 1.) Cut and fill costs could be reduced to about $150,000 or $6,500 an acre. 2.) A relatively flat site would still be desired, thus requiring extensive storm sewer systems and retaining walls. 3.) A composite, total cost for developing the north 23.4 Acres would exceed $250,000 or $10,500 per acre. Frank, we remain convinced that the site has substantial topographic features which will prove costly to improve. We will support the motion that this is a blighted site which should qualify for tax incentives to promote development. Without such incentives, the site remains unusually expensive to develop as a traditional industrial park. Sincerly, KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS, Daryl P. Fortier DPF/ j 1 RUSSELL H. LARSON CRAIG M. MERTZ OF COUNSEL HARVEY E. SKAAR MARK C. MCCULLOUGH Mr. Rodney Gordon Schoell & Madson, Inc. 50 Ninth Avenue South Hopkins, MN 55343 Dear Rodney: LARSON & MERTZ ATTORNEYS AT LAW IBOO FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA S5402 September 27, 1979 Re: The Press, Inc. TELEPHONE 1 (612) 335-9565 Attached you will find a letter from Gabbert & Beck regarding frontage road easement #8. You will note that Mr. Beck is making basically the same proposal that Mr. Fortier made on September 18, 1979. After you have estimated the cost of constructing the bed for the storm sewer pipe and laying the pipe itself, please contact me, as we should meet with Mr. Ashworth regarding this matter. It is my recommendation that your survey department draft a storm water easement across the southwest corner of Outlot B, Plat of Park One. Even if the owners of the property were to donate easement #8, it appears to me that public storm waters would still be trespassing on Outlot B. When you prepare your cost estimates, be sure to include the cost of the manhole proposed by Daryl Fortier. If the City did authorize this additional work as a contract amend- ment, and if the cost of .this new work were included in the special assessment roll, what portion of this additional cost would you recommend as being allocable to the plat of Park One? ry truly yours�,yy� .r� i,t CRAIG M. MERTZ CMM:mep Encl. CG ;-,)L.") 14 OCT 1979 RECRVED to c3e va CHANHAggEH, MINN. c�� .,r Gabbert & Beck 3510 WEST 70TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 16121925 4321 September 26, 1979 Mr. Craig Mertz, Ass't Chanhassen City Attorney Larson & Mertz 1900 First National Bank Bldg. Minneapolis, MN 55402 RE: THE PRESS, INC. Dear Craig: I reviewed the storm sewer situation at The Press today and also discussed the meeting held with the City staff and Daryl Fortier of Korsunsky Krank Architects relative to the situation. It appears to be the concern of The Press that the additional storm water run off which would be dispersed into the open trench from the city street could cause an errosion problem in the rather deep ditch crossing The Press property. For this reason, the architect has recommended that the storm sewer be under ground. In effect, the cost of the storm sewer installation would be shared if the City would install the storm sewer pipe and The Press is responsible for back filling and landscaping the area. It is my understanding that this proposal is under consideration by the City staff. We will await a response from staff before we proceed with the easement. SiV-cerely, PW ren Beck IN THE GALLERIA r LARSON & MERTZ ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING 7' RUSSELL H. LARSON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE CRAIG M. MERTZ (612) 335-9565 OF COUNSEL HARVEY E. SKAAR MARK C. McCULLOUGH September 26, 1979 Mr. Donald W. Ashworth r��,O�v EP 1979 .> Chanhassen City ManagerCZZBox147 zmvzD.may;Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317cHA�aE OF Cry r NASs&N r MINN. Re: The Press, Inc., ,5f� Frontage Road Water Dear Don: Reference is made to the attached letter of September 24, 1979, from the architects for The Press, Inc. After speaking with Craig Mertz who has made on -site inspections, we are of the opinion that the City should have a comprehensive report from our engineers covering the following areas; a) Cause of water main failure in north -south extension of extended frontage road between Lyman Lumber and The Press. b) Claim of Daryl Fortier that the frontage road is being built at a higher elevation than the plans show, causing water pond on The Press building parking lot as per the third paragraph of Craig's file memo of September 18, 1979, attached. The thought strikes us that drainage to the bituminous paving on the Press property may have been caused by either the water main failure or the ponding of surface water on the parking lot, or both. We are of the view that the engineers should give the City their opinion as to causation. In any event, we recommend that the general contractors liability insurance carrier be notified of this potential claim and that the City also inform its liability carrier of the matter��Vedtr ly/.3rours , Chanhassen City Attorney RHL:rab 7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O. BOX 147eCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 September 26, 1979 Mr. Frank Beddor The Press Box 439 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Mr. Beddor: This office has been informed by the City Attorney's office that considerable excavation has occurred within the Park One Addition. It is not yet discernable whether a grading permit would have been necessary for the amount of excavation that has taken place, nonetheless, no additional land alteration.is to occur until such determination has been made. A copy of this notice is being forwarded to the Riley -Purgatory Creek Watershed District for their review. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Bob Waibel Asst. Manager/Land Use Coordinator BW:k cc: Don Ashworth, City Manager Russell Larson, City Attorney Jerry Schlenk, Building Inspector Raymond Jackson, City Engineer Bob Obermeyer, Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS, INC. September 24, 1979 Mr. Don Ashworth City Manager City of Chanhassen 7610 Loredo Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: The Press, Inc. Comm. No. 78-27-01 Dea r Don: 131 ARCHITECTS / PLANNERS INTERIOR DESIGN tioterrod To.' Mayor CaunQ11 _ . - Mannar Odd! no ._�..,..... Attornty lnalnaor _'rringurtr� -- palls::i Fpric� � Rua Utlllti>vS�„d�,M, mow. wl..+ Pros% other _ Otto A substantial amount of damage has occurred to the bituminous paving at The Press, Inc. It is our opinion that the immediate causeof this damage was a failure of a city water main under construction as part of the extended frontage road between Lyman Lumber and The Press. The failure of the main saturated the subsurface, eroding it's support capabilities, resulting in the collapse of paving under normal load conditions. We have requested and received an estimate of cost to repair the damage to the specifications as installed. The estimate is enclosed and submitted for your re- view. We ask that you consider settlement for this damage in the full amount of the estimate of repair. Your prompt attention to this matter would be appreciated. Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS, INC. ��o 0, 4_ut�aj Daryl P. Fortier DPF/dkj cc: Frank Beddor, Jr. Enclosure 555 SHELARD TOWER 600 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD 18 S I P 1979 RECHIV V1IE4 ArE ►V Ct1ANHASS� A J ,_ MINN. CG. J MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 (612)546-5381 Page No. 1 of NORTHWEST ASPHALT, INC. "The only way to pave." 6440 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO Crawford-Merz Com;,any STREET Attn: Tom Merz 2316 4th Avenue South CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE ARCHITECT We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: PHONE DATE 1 Pages PHONE (612) 941-2331 JOB LOCATION DATE OF PLANS I JOB PHONE Area: Figured on 410 sq. yds. Work to be done briefly as follows: 1. Furnish and install necessary crushed rock base 2. Construct a 2" MHD spec. 2341 paver laid hot plant mixed bituminous surface 3. Price - $4,500.00 (Tax incl.) This work is necessary to repair broken area at dock extending to street DUE TO ERRATIC ASPHALT PRICES- TFUS QUOTATION IS GOOD FOR VIORI K COMPLETED THIS YEAR ONLY! 1UF priipatir hereby to furnish material and labor — complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: Four thousand five hundred dollars ($ 4,500.00 ent to be made as follows: Upon completion - net 30 days - 12% interest charged on past due accounts All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike I manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifiea- Authorized tions involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an Signature ref. extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents 1 or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance. Note: This proposal may be Our workers are fully covered by Workmen's Compensation Insurance. withdrawn by us if not accepted within - nan days. Acre Lana of Fropomd —The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized Signature to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Date of Acceptance: Signature „1 KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS. INC. September 24, 1979 Mr. Frank Beddor Jr. The Press Inc. 18780 W. 78th Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Storm Sewer Easement The Press Inc. Comm. No. 79-46-01 Dear Frank: ARCHITECTS / PLANNERS INTERIOR DESIGN SEP 1979 RECMVEU VILLAGE OF. GU CHANHASSEN, �► i [INN. �� l.,_ , On Tuesday, September 18th, the Chanhassen City Planner, representatives of Schoell &_Madson and I met at The Press to review the easement requested. It was verified that the inverts of both storm lines, the City's and The Press's, are at the same elevation. It was also verified that The Press's line was in place prior to the City's and that the Schoell & Madson documents were issued over a month after The Press was under construction. All parties agreed that an easement is required and that it would be extremely expensive for the City to reroute the storm sewer to the highway right-of-way at this location. I advised Mark Koegler that The Press is willing to grant an easement but only if the storm line is underground and extended into the highway right-of-way. This would require the city to install a manhole at the intersection of the two storm lines and extend a concrete storm line to and beyond the southeast corner of the property. 1 further advised that The Press would complete the site work. This will require you to : 1. Remove the existing sod. 2. Prov-ide a trench, in a straight line, off your property. 3. Fill the trench and Swale with soil. 4. Apply topsoil and sodding. Should the city require a fill material not available on your site, the city should provide this material. This proposal is under consideration by Mark and his staff. To execute the easement, 555 SHELARD TOWER 600 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD 18 MINNEAPOLtS, MINNESOTA 55426 (612)546-5381 Mr. Frank Beddor Jr. 2 September 24, t979 the word "underground" should be added as follows: "the perpetual right and easement for an underground storm sewer..." This is as advised by Julius Smith. Yours truly, KORSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS, INC. J Daryl P. Fortier DPF/j 1 cc: Mr. Robert Drewing Mr. Mark Koegler Mr. Jack Gill Mr. Warren Beck dwd- -u- Z, Z