The URL can be used to link to this page

78-04 - Chanhassen Lakes North SUB pt 1_1� f '49-4 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE!P.O. BOX 1479CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 PLANNING REPORT DATE: February 2, 1978 TO: Planning -Commission, Staff, James Hill and Rod Hardy FROM: City Planner, Bruce Pankonin SUBJ: Preliminary Development Plan Review for Carver's Pointe - Chanhassen Lakes North APPLICANT: Dunn and Curry Real Estate Management, Inc. PLANNING CASE: P-486 ORDINANCE REF: Chanhassen City ordinance 47, Section 14.05 Petition As shown in attached enclosures 1-11, the applicant, Dunn and Curry Real Estate Management, Inc., is proposing to rezone the subject property to P-1, Planned Residential Development and subdivide the property into 100 single family residential building sites. Background 1. Community Location: As shown in enclosure 2, the subject property contains 46.5+ gross acres and is located in the southeast quadrant of Carver County Road 17 and Carver Beach Road. 2. Existing Zoning: The subject property and parcels located to the south are presently zoned _ Agricultural Residence district. The property located to the west, north and east is presently zoned Single Family Residence District. 3. Comprehensive Plan Proposal (Carver Beach Neighborhood Plan): a. Land Use: Pursuant to the Carver Beach Plan, the future identity of the land located south of Carver Beach Road should be low density single family residential, platted as a planned unit development. The scale and character of any development in this area should be compatible with that of the adjoining districts. b. Traffic Circulation: The Carver Beach Plan indicates the area should be served with a "south" access road (MSAS 101) connecting County Road 17 with Carver Beach Neighborhood and terminating on West 78th Street, to the south. Planning Commission `-2- February 2,. 1978 C. Park and Open Space: The Carver Beach Neighborhood Plan indicates that it may be desirable to acquire an active play area located in the northeast portion of the subject property. Said play area is intended to augment the existing playground located on Carver Beach Road. d. Linear Open Space System: The Carver Beach Neighborhood Plan indicates an extensive trailway system unifying the Carver Beach Neighborhood and providing easy pedestrian access to the remainder of the city. Said linear open space system is to be considered not only as a in -ode transportation but also, providing areas for "socializing". 4. Utilities: As shown in the city engineer's report, enclosure 9, adequate sanitary sewer and trunk service is available to the subject property. Lateral services will be provided by the applicant during development of Carver's Pointe subdivision. 5. Physiographic Analysis: Two basic landscape characteristics are noted in the subject property. The first are upland loams and clay loam soils and the second are poorly drained depressional soils. a. Analysis of Upland Loams and Clay Loams: This soil group consists of predominantly well and mildly -well drained silty and loamy soils ranging in slopes from 0 to 120. The following soil characteris- tics are common in this area: 1). Seasonal high water table is usually below 5 feet. 2). Permeability is moderately rapid. 3). Bearing strength is fair. 4). Shrink -Swell potential is low to moderate. 5). Potential for frost heave action is moderate to high. 6). Limitations of specific uses: (a) Foundations - moderate# 1. (b) Local Roads and Streets -(moderate. (c) Excavation - Slight to moderate. (d) Lawns and Gardens - slight. (e) Dwellings with basements - moderate. Soils having slopes from 0 to 12% can and have been used successfully for community development with a few precautionary steps. The hazards of soil erosion, sediment deposition and cost of planning are related to the steepness and length of slopes. Foundations and roads are subject to structural damage due to frost action or soil shrink -swell. Footing drains are needed in some areas to control seepage of water into the basement. A few soils within this area have sandy surface layers which are more droughy and difficult to vegetate. Planning Commissio_ 6-3- February 2, 1978 b. Analysis of Poorly Drained Depressional Soils: 1). This soil group consists of somewhat poorly drained soil. Soil properties for this group cover a wide range, but the following soil characteristics are common: (a) Seasonal high water table is at a depth of 1 to four feet. (b) Permeability ranges from slow to rapid. (c) Bearing strength is fair to poor. (d) Shear Strength is fair to poor. (e.) Shrink -Swell potential is mostly moderate to high. (f) Potential front heave action is high. (g) Slope ranges from 0 to 6%. (h) Limitations for specific uses: (1) Foundations - moderate to severe. (2) Local Roads and Streets - severe. (3) Excavation - severe. (4) Lawns and Gardens - slight. (5) Dwellings with basements - severe. (i) These soils are severely limited as locations for residential developments due to the poor drainage and seasonal high water table. Even with proper design and engineering to overcome the limitations, the maintenance and upkeep of roads, utilities, etc. can be quite expensive due the wetness and structural damage by frost action. Many of these soils could be used for parks, open space or retained for crop land. 6. Procedures for PUD Approval: The procedures for considering Carver's Pointe Planned Residential Development (PRD) are outlined in enclosure 3. If you are keeping tabs, we are presently at "Step 6". Summary of Staff Comments 1. The Engineer's Comments: As shown in enclosure 9, the city engineer duly reviewed Carver's Pointe Preliminary Development Plan and recommended approval if the developer reduces the street right-of- way width to 50 feet. 2. Building Inspector's Comments: The building inspector feels the plan does not address itself to the objectives of a planned residential development. Further, the building inspector feels the lots abutting County Road 17 and MSAS 101 should have additional depth so as to provide screen plantings; the lowland areas, Lots 1-13, Block 1, should be used as a neighborhood park. A contradiction between the PUD procedures Planning Commission -4- February 2, 1978 and the Subdivision ordinance is noted; and the building inspector feels the Penamint/Carver Beach Road intersection could be dangerous. 3. The Fire Marshal's Comments: As shown in enclosure 11, the fire marshal, like the building inspector, questions the Penamint lane/ Carver Beach Road intersection. In addition the fire marshal felt the street name "Santee Lane" sounds similar to Shawnee and Santa Fe and some confusion could develop. Planner's Comments 1. The critiera for evaluating a Planned Residential Development (PRD) is identified in Section 14 of City Ordinance 47. The purpose of the P-1 use district, among other things is to "provide the means for greater creativity and flexibility..." and, "provide for the establish- ment of regulations and procedures for planned residential developments to meet the needs for moderate and low cost housing... without sacrificing quality construction and... tax base." 2. All the objectives of the zoning ordinance are, of course, subjective and require a process of evaluation that is basically qualitative rather than quantitative in character. Certain aspects of the PRD proposal, such as it's impact on the natural landscape, public utilites and transportation system, can be reviewed quantitatively, however, these items are the exception rather than the rule. It is precisely because of the subjective nature of the process that planning commission members, planners, city councilmen and citizens are involved. A computer could do the job if the process was simply quantitative. Judgement, based on reason, and on understanding the relationship between the proposal and a subjective guideline setforth in Section 14.01, is the crux of the decision making process. 3. The type of residential structure most suitable for the subject site is easy to determine at this time. Among the factors that must be considered, are contemporary housing market economics, the needs and desires of those seeking housing opportunities in Chanhassen and the physical impact of structures on the natural environment. The impact of quanitative demographic characteristics of the project's residents on the social and economic welfare of the entire. community is also an important item to consider. 4. The natural characteristics of the site (0 to 12% slope, devoid of trees)are natural components for low density single family developments. The only limiting natural characteristics of the site is the "potential" for a high seasonal water table in the northeast corner of the property. 5. Density: From the information submitted by the petitioner, I have calculated the net density to be 2.45 dwelling units per net acre after local streets, with a 50 foot right-of-way, were subtracted from the gross area. This density would represent a total population of approximately 320 people. The density as proposed is lower than a typical R-1, Single Family Residential Development. Planning Commissio_ `-5�A February 2, 1978 6. Demographic Characteristics: The 100 dwelling units will, in all probability attrack families similar to new residents which are being located in Ecklund and Swedlund's Hidden Ponds (directly across the street from Colonial Grove on STH 101). 7. Double Frontage Along County Road 17: The building inspector made an excellent point of the undesirability of residences "backing on" to an arterial highway. This undesirable feature can be mitigated if the local street right-of-way was reduced from 60 to 50 feet and the entire plat shifted 30 feet to the east. This will have the effect of adding 30 feet to the rear lots in Block 4. Within this 30 feet the applicant should be required to prepare a landscape plan which would be so designed as to break up the vertical relief from the road to the rear of the house. This landscape plan could consist of earth berms, plant materials and fences. 8. Neighborhood Park Needs: The Park and Recreation Commission is presently studying the need for providing neighborhood parks for the new residents of Carver's Pointe subdivision. It is my feeling, as city planner, neighborhood park needs (ball diamonds, tennis courts, hockey rinks, free skating areas, soccer fields, passive recreational land, picnicking, etc.) would be better handled in an expansion of the Western Hills Park approximatley 1/3 mile to the south of the subject site. The Park and Recreation Commission, should, however, consider the use of the Carver Beach "tot lot" (northeast of the subject property) and develop a more meaningful activity area. Possible improvements could include a tennis court, picnic shelter and off-street parking area. 9. The applicant should work closely with the building inspector in developing a street naming program so as not to confuse the casual visitor ,to Chanhassen. 10. The applicant should work closely with the city engineer so as to not develop any dangerous intersections as anticipated by the fire marshal and building inspector. 11. 68th street presently exists as a "paper" roadway bisecting the subject property. Said roadway will have to be vacated by the Chanhassen City Council prior to acceptance of the Carver's Pointe subdivision. Planner's Recommendation I recommend the applicant work closely with the building inspector, city engineer and planner to develop a suitable landscape screening along County Road 17 and MSAS 101.° In addition, the applicant should work closely with the building inspector to design a street naming program which will not be confusing. And, finally, the Planning Commission should order a public hearing to test neighborhood sentiment on the proposed Planned Residential Development. Said public hearing could be held on Wednesday, March 8, at 7:45 p.m. WILLIAM D. SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON JACK T. VOSLER JAMES R. ORR HAROLD E. DAHLIN LARRY L. HANSON RAYMOND J. JACKSON WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY JACK E. GILL ROONEY B. GORDON THEODORE D. KEMNA JOHN W. EMOND KENNETH E. ADOLF WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT BRUCE C. SUNDING City of Chanhassen c/o Don Ashworth P. 0. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Gentlemen: SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC. ENGINEERS ANO SURVEYORS 7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 OFFICES AT HURON, SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON, TEXAS January 31, 1978 Subject: Carver's Pointe - Chanhassen Lakes North - Preliminary Development Plan. Our File No. 7120 We have reviewed the Preliminary Development Plan for the subject development as prepared by James R. Hill, Inc. and dated January 6, 1978. GENERAL Primary access to the proposed development, located south- west of Carver Beach Subdivision, will be gained from MSAS - 101 (scheduled for construction in 1978). Secondary access will be provided from Carver Beach Road and Nez Perce. The proposed street and lot arrangement avoids areas with questionable soil conditions, minimizes grading and preserves natural ponding areas. STREETS The 60 foot -right-of-way widths shown can be reduced to 50 feet as required by ordinance. Cul-de-sac dimensions meet ordinance standards. Minimum, maximum and intersection street grades meet ordinance standards. The interior streets will be constructed to 28 foot width (out -to -out). Cul-de-sacs will have a 80 foot diameter. Concrete driveover curbs will be required. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER Trunk sewer service will be provided through the Carver Beach and Greenwood Shores Trunk System. Trunk water will be provided by connection to the existing 18-inch watermain in Carver Beach Rcad and Nez Perce. SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC. City of Chanhassen Page 2 January 31, 1978 Lateral sewer and water service will be provided to lots abutting Carver Beach Road and Nez Perce through connection to the Carver Beach system. The lot grades shown on the Development Plan (sheet 3 of 4) provide adequate grade between the proposed houses and the existing sewer. Lateral service to the interior lots will be adequately provided by the system shown on the Proposed Utility Plan (sheet 4 of 4). The cost of all utilities proposed will be borne by the Dev- eloper. In addition a total of $166,776 will be assessed for Carver Beach and -Greenwood Shores Improvements. DRAINAGE The storm sewer system shown on the plan will accomodate a 10-year frequency storm as required by the City. Runoff from the interior 17 acres of Block 1 and about 5 acres in Carver Beach will be retained within the development in two pro- posed permanent ponds. An overflow pipe will accomodate flow from higher intensity storms. No discharge would result from a 10 year storm Runoff from the remainder of the area would be directed to a low area in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of County Road 17 and MSAS - 101. Downstream storage to accomodate this flow will be recommended in the Lotus Lake Drainage Study to be completed in Mid -February. The storm sewer piping and storage facilities shown within the proposed development are adequate as shown. SUM-MARY We recommend approval of the Preliminary Development Plan with reduction of the street right-of-ways.to 50 feet. Very truly yours, SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. WJBrezinsky:cm CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O BOX 1479CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 MEM0RWIpUM, TOP Bruce Pankonin and Plannincj Commission FROM; Jerry $chlenk, Building Inspector DATE: January 31, 1978 SUBJ; Carvers Point Chanhassen Lakes North Bruce, my first impression in looking at Carvers Point - Chanhassen Lakes North leads me to believe it should go right back to the developer for him to look at it in light of city ordinances, regardless of being a PRD. Section 8.02, Sub -Section C (Street Plan) and Section 8.06 Sub - Section F (Double Frontage), reads as follows: "No preliminary plat should be approved wherein lots abut on the right-of-way of State or major county or Village (City) roads. Such lots may abut on service roads with entrances to State or major county or Village (City) roads within intervals of not less than 1,000 feet." Double Frontage, Section 8.06 Subsection F: "Lots with frontage on two parallel streets shall not be permitted except where lots back an arterial street or highway. Double frontage lots shall have an additional depth for screen plantirig along the rear lot lines. There are many lots in this PRD that abut major roads - County Road 117 and MSAS 101. Santee Lane. and Redwing Lane enter onto MSAS 101 and Ordinance 33, Section 8.02, Subsection C states that entrance intervals of not less than 1,000 feet are required. Lots 1-13, Block 1, which is the low land area - why not have a neighborhood park owned and maintained by all residents in the PRD rather than separate ownership as shown. Ordinance 33, Section 8.06, Subsection a(1): Lots; In areas served by public water and sanitary sewer systems, the maximum number of lots to be permitted in a plat shall be computed by subtracting from the total gross area of the plat the total dedicated street right-of-way and dividing the remaining after said subtraction by 15,000 to determine the maximum number of lots permitted in said plat. In no event shall a lot contain less than 11,700 square feet, nor have a frontage of less than 90 feet at the building setback line. No lot shall be larger than twice the average size of lots in said plat. � a Mr. Bruce Pankonin -2- January. 31, 1978 The intersection of Carver Beach Road and Penamint could be the creation of a dangerous intersection. I do not have a topography map to see right where it comes into the hill on Carver Beach Road. Section 14. P-1 Planned Residential Development District, reads as follows: "14.01 Objectives. The Village (City) being confronted with increasing urbanization and acknowledging that technology of land development and demand for housing are undergoing substantial and repid changes, intends: 1. To provide the means for greater creativity and flexibility in environmental design than is provided under the strict application of the zoning and subdivision ordinances without compromising the health, safety, order, convenience and general welfare of the Village (City) and its residents. 2. To encourage the more efficient allocation and innovative use of common open space adjoining residential buildings in order that greater opportunities for Better housing and recreation may be extended to the residents of the Village (City). 3. To provide for the establishment of regulations and procedures for planned residential district development designed to meet the need for moderate and low cost housing, including the utilization of pre - constructed and preassembled dwelling units of a permanent nature without sacrificing quality construction and assembly standards and tax base; and 4. To provide administrative procedures which can relate a planned development district to a particular site and which may encourage the disposition of planned development district proposals without undue delay. I do not think this plan addresses itself to the objectives of a planned residential district as much as it does to the developer to see how many lots he can get on a parcel of land. Bruce, I think it's a bad plan. fr/ 00e 4 r 448-2111 ��! I �kiR H '3i eCFe� rest EMERGENCY PHONE 44E1 F, Chanhassen Fire Department P. O. BOX 97 • 7610 LAREDO DRIVE • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 BUS. PHONE 474-9191 January 31, 1978 TO: Bruce Pankonin and Planning Commission FROM: Mark Littfin, Bureau of Fire Prevention SUBJECT: James R. Hill, Inc. 1. The street named Santee Lane sounds similiar to Shawnee and Santa Fe which are existing streets in Chanhassen. Some confusion could result in communication distinguishing the different names. 2. The intersection of Carver Beach Road and Penamint Lane could be a hazardous intersection in that the two could be on a hill. SUB CT: Chanhassen Lakes Business Park 1. Wil there be a watermain and fire hydrants located on the chu proper for fire protection? 2. Where will e driveway be to get to the church Zdead 3. Will the 12" wa rmain be looped to the system bService Station o Chanhassen Estates to elimina SUBJECT: Minnewashta Creek 1. Not enough information. 2. Traffic coming out of Minnewasht reek Development should not enter onto State Highway 7. SUBJECT: Office Building -,/ld Feed Mill Site 1. Not enough informa�xon. SUBJECT: MTS 1. What i e size of the watermain going to the building fo ire prot tion and is the system going to be looped? 2. 11 there be a secondary access road to the plant off Highway 5 emergency vehicles in case the main entrance is inaccessible? PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (PRD) or PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (PCD) CASE NO. PRD/PCD — Oil; City of Chanhassen Carver and Hennepin Counties, Minnesota APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application January 27, 978 Escrow Paid .a Date / 6 Received by , Applicant Name: Dunn and Curry Real Estate Management, Inc. Address: 4940 Viking Drive, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 Number and Street City State Zip Code Owner: Dunn and Curry Real Estate Management Inc. Address: 4940 Viking Drive, Minneapolis, Minnesota '55435 Number and Street City State Zip Code Address of property in question: S. E. Corner Highway 17 and Carver Beach Road Legal description of property in question: Exhibit "A" (Under separate cover)- 46.5 gross acres Present zoning of property:_R-IA_- Agricultural Residence District Present use of property: Partially agricultural Proposed use of property: P-1, Planned Residential Development The followiria documents shall be attached to this application: Date Received Initial 1. Sketch Plan 2. Preliminary Development Plan / 9 3. Escrow Account ($500.00) it� Date Received Initial 4. Abstractor's Certificate 5. Final Development Plan I hereby declare that all statements made in this application and on the attached documents are true, and that I shall reimburse the City for all expenses incurred in processing this application for planned unit development. � e ignatu op an Signatur OPQW r 2 � � ?ate Received by jritle Daft - (Following to be completed by Aoning Administrator or City Official) CHRONOLOGY DATE BY Sketch Plan on Planning Commission Agenda Planning Commission Postponed to Preliminary Development Plan on Planning Commission Agenda Planning Commission Postponed to News a er Publication S > > 6 Adjacent Property Owners Notified ,c Public Hearing 6 Planning Commission Action ti Preliminary Development Plan on Council Agenda y 3 Council Postponed to Count 1 Action Preliminary Development Plan Contract Final Development Plan or Planning Commission Agenda Planning Commission Postponed to .Final Development Plan on Council Agenda Council Postponed to Final Development Plan Contract Executed Escrow Returned - Amount: a IS OF It 10: OF PL px Lotus L 00 -mayPK ENCL. IL COMMUNITY LOCATION •Lake PLANNING CASE: P-486 PK OF OF O'El 019 OF Ft A. QpB Lake Susan R'ce Marsh OF Lake OF 34 E:3 3" 340 LEI F1 Lake -0 Riley OF -� M LOT 6 a Y.a.-�'•'� LK�'h •C � m�u..�-�,•t L...c�'r— 13, Sir �, ��' � $'`` RA, iAL.. L.oTS U __. .. TOTA L p,e F a -- 1 1 •5 A,- -27- C-�cl 3 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS (PRD) •m PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTS (PCD) Chronology Introduction The City being confronted with increasing urbanization and acknowledging that technology of land development and demand for housing are undergoing substantial and rapid changes, intends: 1. To provide the means for greater creativity and flexibility in environmental design than is provided under the strict application of the zoning and subdivision ordinances without compromising the health, safety, order, convenience and general welfare of the City and its residents: 2. To encourage the more efficient allocation and innovative use of common open space adjoining residential buildings in order that greater opportunities for better housing and recreation may be extended to the residents of the City. 3. To provide for the establishment of regulations and procedures for planned residential district development designed to meet the need for moderate and low cost housing, including the uti- lization of preconstructed and preassembled dwelling units of a permanent nature without sacrificing quality construction and assembly standards and tax base; and 4. To provide administrative procedures which can relate a planned development district to a particular site and which may encourage the disposition of planned development district proposals without undue delay. Step -by -Step Procedure for Processing an Application for Planned Residential Development. (Ref. Ordinance #47, Section 14). Step 1. PETITIONER a. Initial Information. All applications for PRD or PCD shall be filed in the o fice of the Zoning Administrator and shall be accommodated by adequate evidence that PRD or PCD will be under Single Ownership or Unified Control. 29L.Im b. Additional Information - Sketch Plan The applicant may prepare a Sketch plan of the proposed development for review by the Planning Commission. Such sketch plan will be considered as having been submitted for informal discussion between the applicant and the Planning Commission. Step 2. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR a. Reviews documents submitted in Step 1 above, and request any additional information from petitioner. b. Forwards copies of petition to other staff or governmental agencies (i.e. Metropolitan Council, Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Highway Department, Watershed District, Environmental Quality Council, adjacent governmental units, Industrial Commission, Central Business District Committee,Fire Chief, Park Board, etc.) as deemed appropriate at least fourteen (14) days prior to the Planning Commission meeting. C. Prepares planning report which includes comments from other staff and forwards copies to each Planning Commission member and petitioner no later than Friday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Step 3. PLANNING COMMISSION a. Reviews documents and reports as submitted in Step 1 and 2 above. b. Hears petitioners informal presentation of the proposed PRD or PCD. C. Advises the petitioner of the extent to which the sketch plan conforms to the Comprehensive City Plan, Zoning Ordinance and other ordinances of the City. Step 4. PETITIONER a. Reviews the comments made in Step 3 above. b. Prepares a Preliminary Development Plan containing the following information: (1) Maps and drawings which may be in a general schematic form and showing: a) enough of the area surrounding the proposed development to demonstrate the relationship of the planned development to adjacent uses, b) proposed land uses, area, population densities and land use intensities for each area of land included in the proposed development, c) existing topography, '1, -29- (1) cont. - d) existing tree cover, buildings, streets and other site improvements, e) proposed access system, indicating both public and private streets, f) common open space and public uses, including schools, parks, recreation areas and undeveloped properties, g) the architectural style of each different type of building. (2) A written report or statement which shall include a) the nature of the applicant's ownership or control in the land proposed to be developed, b) a description of the type of proposed development, including population densities and land use intensities, c) requested modification in the requirements of this ordinance other- wise applicable to the property, d) the expected schedule and sequence of development. C. Deposits with the city an escrow account as outlined in item 10 on page 2. Said escrow account shall be deposited prior to Planning Commission review as outlined in Step 5 below. d. An abstractor's certificate showing the names and addresses of all property owners within three hundred fifty, (350) feet of the outer boundaries of the property in question. Step 5. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR a. Reviews documents submitted in Step 4 above, and requests any missing information from petitioner. b. Forwards copies of petition to other staff or governmental agencies as deemed appropriate at least fourteen (14) days prior to the Planning Commission Meeting. C. Prepares planning report which includes comments from other staff and forwards copies for each Planning Commission member and petitioner no later than Friday prior to the Planning Commission Meeting. Step 6. PLANNING COMMISSION a. Reviews documents and reports as submitted in Step 1 - 5 above. b. Hears petitioners informal presentation of the proposed PRD or PCD. C. Sets date for public hearing or requests additional information from petitioner. If additional information is requested, Steps 4 and 5 shall be repeated. -30- Step 7. PUBLIC HEARING. a. City Administrator. (1) Advertises notice of public hearing as governed by State Statute and City Ordinance. (2) Notifies owners of adjacent property, as supplied by the petitioner, of public hearing at least ten (10) days prior to hearing. b. Planning Commission opens public hearing for the purpose of hearing: (1) Petitioners formal presentation. (2) Arguments from general public. C. Planning Commission either continues public hearing to a future date os closes public hearing. d. PlanninV Commission forwards a report to the City Council stating its findings and recommendations within sixty (60) days of the date of the public hearing, designation such conditions and guarantees as the commission deems necessary for protection of the public interest. Step 8. CITY COUNCIL. a. Considers Planning Commission recommendations at the second regular meeting after Planning Commission action. b. Council either grants or denies PRD or PCD Preliminary Development Plan. c. If the Council approves Preliminary Development Plan the Council shall find: (1) The proposed development is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. (2) The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boudaries. (3) The proposed uses will not be detrimental to present and future land uses in the surrounding area. (4) Any exceptions to the zoning and subdivision ordinances are justified by the design of the development. (5) The planned development is of sufficient size, composition and arrangement that its construction and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any other unit. -31- (6) The planned development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which are proposed to serve the development. (7) The planned development will not have an adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of neighboring property. d. If the Council denies Preliminary Development Plan, the Council shall state reasons for disapproval. Step 9. OPTION The City Council may hold whatever public hearing it deems advisable and shall make a decision upon the application to approve Preliminary Development Plans if the Council decides to hold a public hearing the procedure for public hearing notification as outlined in Number 7 above shall be repeated. Step 10. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. a. Forwards copy of the Council action to Planning Commission and petitioner and retains a copy in Case file folder. b. Requests City Attorney to prepare and execute development contract as per City Council action. Step 11. PETITIONER. (Final Development Plan) a. Prepares Final Development Plan which include the following: (1) Preliminary plat in accordance with the applicable provisions of Ordinance 33, Chanhassen Subdivision Ordinance, including agreements, provisions, covenants and specifications required for approval of the final development plan. (2) Final building drawings and specifications. (3) Final site plans including a landscape schedule. (4) Engineering plans and reports as required by the Council. (5) Any other information or documents required by the Council for the approval of the final development plan including a planned unit development contract and any bonds, deposits of money or security. Step 12. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. a. Reviews documents submitted in Steps 7 - 11 above, and requests any additional information from petitioner. -32- b. Prepares Planning Report which includes comments from other staff and forwards copies to each Planning Commission member no later than Friday prior to the Planning Commission Meeting. Step 13. PLANNING COMMISSION. Recommends approval or disapproval of Final Development Plan to City Council. Step 14. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. Forwards Planning Commission recommendation to City Council. Step 15. CITY COUNCIL. a. Approves Final Development Plan. b. Disapproves Final Development Plan stating reasons for the disapproval or; C. Approves final Development Plan subject to specified modifications or conditions. Step 16. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. a. Forwards copy of Council action to Planning Commission and petitioner and retains a copy in case file folder. b. Instructs City Attorney to prepare and execute Final Development Plan contract as,per City Council action. C. Maintain a "come -up" file where a time limit is stated by the City Council. W Step 17. Returns remaining escrow deposit to petitioner. PLANNING COMMISSION. The Planning Commission shall review all PRD or PCD districts at least once each year and submit a report to the City Council on the status of each development. Step 18. CITY COUNCIL. a. If the Council finds that development has not occurred within a reasonable time after approval of the final development plan, the Council may instruct the Planning Commission to initiate rezoning to the original zoning district by removing the Planned District zoning. WILLIAM D. SCHDELL CARLISLE MADSON JACK T. VOSLER JAMES R. ORR HAROLD E. DAHLIN LARRY L. HANSON RAYMOND J. JACKSON WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY JACK E. GILL ROONEY B. GORDON THEODORE D. KEMNA JOHN W.EMOND KENNETH E. ADOLF WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT BRUCE C. SUNDING Mr. Hibbert Hill 7075 Carver Beach Road Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 Dear Mr. Hill: SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC. ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS 16121 838-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343 OFFICES AT HURON, SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON, TEXAS March 8, 1978 _4L P C-/ 0 P Subject: Carver's Point Planned Community Development -- Drainage. Your concerns regarding the erosion of the drainage creek abutting your property as outlined in your letter of February 27, 1978, are shared by the Chanhassen City Council. In September, 1977, the Council authorized our firm to study methods to provide guidance to prevent erosion and siltation problems caused by development of the area tributary to this creek. The study is scheduled for completion on March 20. However, the portion of the study relating to the subject subdivision has been completed and our recommendations are as follows: 1) Two permanent storage ponds within the development, designed to accommodate 100-year frequency storms, should be constructed to receive runoff from 29.6 acres of the total 46 acres to be developed. 2) The maximum outflow from the two ponds will be limited to about 15 percent of the maximum inflow. 3) A temporary retention pond should be constructed south of the pro- posed development to store runoff from the remainder of the subdivision and overflow from the two permanent ponds. Design would be the same as for the permanent ponds. The developer has incorporated these recommendations into the preliminary drainage plan. Requirements for the remaining vacant the same as those in Carver's Pointe. The permanent storage. land tributary to the creek will be temporary pond will be replaced by ( MAR 1978 REC��V Ti ED �� SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC. Mr. Hibbert Hill Page 2 March 8, 1978 The Planning Commission will be holding a Public Hearing on this plan for Carver's Pointe on March 8, 1978. The Carver's Pointe plan and the City Drainage Study will be submitted to the Riley -Purgatory Creek Watershed District Board of Managers for review and approval. We expect both to be agenda items at the Board of Managers' meeting on April 5. We will send you copies of the Public Hearing Minutes, Board of Managers' Meeting Minutes and the City Drainage Study when available. Very truly yours, SCHOELL & MADSON, ITC. WJBrezinsky:bk V cc: Mr. Don Ashworth, City Manager Mr. Walt Hobbs -33- b. Amendments: Changes in uses, any rearrangement of lots, blocks, or building tract, any changes relating to common open space areas, and all other changes in the approved final development plan may be made by the Council only after a public hearing by the Planning Commission and the submission of its recommendations thereon to the Council. No amendments may be made in the approved final development plan unless they are found to be required by changes in conditions which have occurred subsequent to approval of the final development plan, or by changes in the development policy of the Council. All such changes shall be filed in the office of the Zoning Administrator as amendments to the final development plan. re D.Nl Ul, INXV Id G 73 *DL]l HAVI h�lr� �111\�l\IMrI'.1 . III .n �I\1�1 illY r:R\YI r�C•-Y •••-.--. _ _-1ZL__�---SC�•ss 'r.n•L+�S��a-r.�lrr.r v. �•' ur r.t•. _•• -`_ - itY1'I NIA, !NVIVISNOD a\Nll\0N-JUNVJAI\V1'1 _ Nl1d -L N -3 V'A 11 iln30 ' I �LLIVI H1ZION S3MV-) N3S,7HNVN� Illi i '�SJ31M1•d S,b3ntir =R ' 3 $ 3 r e Stti • r r 4 o J J YI + C N YI rp = J'• :e l = y �. � ��„-�,�� Tn .\• �•- l`�,�'\ g :Y"�•/' yam`/>a, . �VV�"" � � �_� y i I _J I NH 'r "�CJ��L_L=s� _oi/ s z � t• — _,—.._—._ Z k4 GAvl 0 wy ... '\VlY'Vtll:1•\IL\(M)IN lll. 1(T IL\SR l[{[1MV 31 lMk1l + '_ •' -�. r"'• I�r SS '^""�" !"O•�°]•.••�?�au M..�w aet». 'JN1"1!!]N 3'1V n1M 31V1s] 1`3b 1 •► Nh- � :� ,- +i 1NV1 SiNOJ OVINMION3 GNV ONANNNId S`d36'1 10"1 7 S'A' 11 �1� 'XU� j•NS@LL - —N355'+'MN�N] sa l•1.. =r l III` HlrON S3A'al N3��d{1NV110-3LNIOd s,J3MV3 �b a z� • • ZY�� W jt 3 r' €'d w O OI f 3 1 4 -_ ' - --ice• \,-iy ��----o� - -$';; ---g- - q- 15, �..q, S• �`y �o � 11. 0��. a '\.•`�'�` {a• $\: COSY � �_._ F • S_ , , I L - �QnlO 4T3 n.o{) [I QFj IY'•. )7 i - -•- - _ -•- iC� I \\Il\ wl(1A11\lAl!11 11L.K11 kN Al RIXIII%151111N "!•'�• $Gyii i1N1'rl 51 �'a .;a 7n1 L 3T1NYNI 31VLC? ;b ]'° 1`1.NIQ1NV11nSNOJ ONQUINION] dNV SNINNVk1'allIIiH •�sau.I�(_- _- N1L10P� "3.1�1' Ml�`�d"il`tH1 y:I �-=: — — 3 r Q v � - 1 y l el i J S V E G Y` J �! _ `• v f k x. i •i CARVER'S POINTE Chanhassen Lakes North Planned Residential Development (P. R. D. ) FACT SHEET Applicant: Dunn and Curry Real Estate Management, Inc. 4940 Viking Drive - Suite #608 Pentagon Office Park Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 Land Owner: Dunn and Curry Real Estate Management, Inc. 4940 Viking Drive - Suite #608 Pentagon Office Park Minneapolis, Minnesota. 55435 Type of Proposed Single family dwellings: Development: Minimun lot size: 75 x -140 = 10,500 S.F. Average Lot size: 16,509 S.F. Number -of lots: 100 Density: 2.15 lots per gross acre All units subject to Restrictive Covenants controlled by Architectural Review Board. All lots to have FHA/VA approvals. Modification of Requirements of Existing Zoning: 1. R-1 Agricultural to Planned Residential'Development. 2. Vacating of W. 68th Street right-of-way and addition of two through streets (Santee Lane and Redwing Lane) , one loop street (Penamint Lane) with three cul-de-sacs - (maximum depth of'500 feet) - Penamint Court; Santee Court; Nez Perce Court; extension os Nez Perce Road to MSAS 101. 3. Reduction of minimum lot size to 10,500 S.F. with average net lot at 16,509 S.F. Development Schedule: Late Spring -Summer 1978: Installation of Stage One utilities. Rough grading of site and all streets. Summer/Fall 1978: Installation of base streets for Santee Lane, Santee Court and Redwing Land. Spring 1979: Installation of Stage Two utilities. Base streets - Penamint Lane,. Penamint Court, Nez Perce Court. Fall 1979: Final paving - all streets. COST ESTMATE WORK INC. -PROJ. NO. C- �e r s PG I ;-1 SHEET__ 7 — SKEET SHEET PROJECT NAME l la �'iassen �a yes � rrc yr wvnh DATE CALC. BY -- DATE CHECK.cD ©Y - ,0.�.'! limit UNIT -, r ; o C E - — I �� I STORM SE4,ER 2. _ 1.2 ' RCP 15" RCP L. F. L. F. �5n� ,, o0 � 1475 1100 —+ 3. 21 " RCP L. F. fig°% 245 4. 124" RCP L. F. 1295 ZS SGU 00 .5. 6. j 30" RCP _ 42" RCP L. F. L. F. 2y °= .0 3500 s 300 ./ 510 ►r (.CA Gv I -1Qs0 a� i - 7. ( Catch Basin Ea. 4s-n°—° 13 1-0 513 8. , Catch Basin/Manholes Ea. 6,C90 �n 17 ✓ I (� 2 t� U _- 9. ! Manholes Ea. Cx,0` 4 10. I Flared -end sections 11. Ria Rap Ea. Ton Zo°= 9 65 �u°UC, RESIDENTIAL STREETS 1. y 1'2" gearing Course Z. 2" Binder Course Tons Tons ,/ ,. o0 bi 1073 ✓ 1433 ✓ Wo.. 073 o v I 3. I 6" Class 5 Tons 4506 ✓ 4. ! Tack Coat Gals. sa 393 -o 5_ i Curb and Gutter I L.F. ✓4°� 9012 ,/ -j - - i - I (jZ 23j �` -° I !� { STATE AiD STREET I I 1. i Street,,c�o,mplete-in-place (Centerline) -bic. UaCVe!oper to LU11:5t'PII1 resi nenti al Pqui valent) L.F. I I 1 SUBTOTAL ENC-!NEERING F-A C0 _7I N!= \r S .► ' L. SUjU-RZ-)AN Ei GiNIZE6RING1, INC. COST ESTIMATE WORK SHEET PROD. PLO. _ irVer' S SHEET-U; SHEETS. PROJECT NA;�1E '_�3,^__^a an_I �Ir��c tJOrth I TYPE OF WORK DATE CAL'. 6Y DATE CHECKED BY r E M ITEM UMT ;-f 3� 0^62 " 047iTY AN10UWT SANITARY SF 41ER 1. 81, PVCP 0 L.F. �/ /v 1385 2. 8" PVCP 8' 10' L.F. ✓ J/S° 1735 5Z i �o 3. 8" PVCP 10' 12' L.F. ✓ p° 1765 ./ ZIu I °e 4. 8" PVCP 12' 14' L.F. ✓14 an 155 5. 8" PVCP 14' -15' L.F. ,� /c, 1--e 85 6. Std. Manholes 0'-8' Ea. 1 /Gov°--" 26 7. Drop manholes 0'-8' Ea. ✓6, o i C)a 8. Excess M.H. depth over 8' L.F. Go 00 50 ✓ ✓ 2vvc) �o 9. 4" PVC Service complete Ea. ✓ (, a-. 1 87 ✓ S2L °LCLD 10. Bit. street replacement SQ.Yd ✓lo s 150 ✓ ✓ 15-00 o� 11. Excess droa riser L.F. ,/6o 6 ✓ ✓' 3�0 l°`' 12. Construct droo to ex. M.H. Ea. ✓Soon`—' 1 ,/ ✓ S'�ca °—' 13. Cut into ex. MI.H. Ea. ✓Zoo°° _� 1 V ✓ 2-00 G.`= ✓ WATER' IfA1i: 1. 18" DIP L.F. J 444= 118 ✓ ✓ ZP,3 2. 8" DIP L.F. ✓ /c) 4,0 1700 ✓ I ,/ I �,S'v (�—' 3. 6" DIP L.F. ✓s S° 3620 ✓ I ✓ io° 4. 8" Gate valve E� box Ea. ✓5�0 °O 4 ,/ ✓ C�vc�? 5. 6" Gate valve & box _ Ea. ✓Zsv "= 13 ✓ 3ZS-0 6. Fire hydrant with aux. gate valve Ea. /uoa"O 13 ✓ / 30Uv 7. Water service complete in place Ea. ✓ZSv °° 87 ✓ ,/ ZI -75-v 1 °O 8. Fittinas jLb. ✓ /°= 8490 ✓ 010 °O ✓ �I�7�i�-Z�oO 1 SUBTOTAL .. . ENG!N;E'R6NG B CONT'•NG;NC'=S „'A PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (Preliminary Development Plan) On this day of 19 , this PRD/PCD was recommen a or (approval), (disapproval) subject to the following conditions: Chairman of P aiining Commission Action by City - Preliminary Development Plan On this day of 19 , the Chanhassen City Council, Carver an Hennepin Counties, Minnesota (approved), (disapproves this Preliminary PRD/PCD subject to the following conditions: By order of the Chanhassen City Council Mayor Attest: City Administrator F k PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION - Final Development Plan On this _day of ~19 , this Final Development Plan was recommencied for lapproval) , disapproval) subject to the following conditions: Chairman of Planning Commission Action by City - Final Development Plan On this day of 19 , the Chanhassen City Council, Carver and Hennepin Counties, Minnesota (approved), (disapprove. this Final PRD/PCD subject to the following conditions: By order of the Chanhassen City Council Mayor Attest: City Administrator I T Y O F 0FV F CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O. BOX 1479CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 February 28, 1978 Mr. Hibbert Hill 7075 Carver Beach Road Excelsior, MN 55331 Dear Mr. Hill: We have received your letter of February 27, 1978, concerning the drainage situation in conjunction with the Dunn and Curry Carver Pointe Development. Your letter will be entered into the public record. I have been informed that both the developer and the city engineer have prepared, or are preparing, drainage and erosion control plans for this watershed. Their findings will be discussed at the public hearing of March 8, 1978. If you cannot be in attendance, we can forward to you a transcript of their presentations of findings. Additionally, I have been informed that the city engineer will be presenting his final draft of the Lotus Lake Drainage Study on or about March 20, 1978, for city council review. As to specific answers to the questions you raised in your letter, I suggest that you call Bill Brezinsky at 938-7601, or bring them up at the March 8th public hearing. Thank you for your comments and concern. Sincerely, Bob Waibel Assistant City Planner BW;k REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 81 1978 Roman Roos called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. with the following members present: Les Bridger, Dick Matthews, and Hud Hollenback. Jerry Neher came at 7:45 p.m. Mal MacAlpine and Walter Thompson were absent. MINUTES: Hud Hollenback moved to approve the February 22, 1978, Planning Commission minutes as written. Motion seconded by Dick Matthews. The following voted in' favor: Roman Roos, Hud Hollenback, and Dick Matthews. Les Bridger abstained. Motion carried. Hud-Hollenback moved to note the February 21, 1978, Council minutes. Motion seconded by Dick Matthews and unanimously approved. PUBLIC HEARING CARVER POINTE SUBDIVISION AND REZONING The Chairman called the public hearing to order at 7:45 p.m. The following interested persons were present: Bill Brezinsky Walt Hobbs, 6671 Powers Blvd. W. E. Engebretson, 1401 Greenwood Drive Al Klingelhutz, 8601 Great Plains Blvd. Jim Knop, 6800 Nez Perce Stelios Aslanidis, 2614 Nicollet Ave., Mpls. Ed Dunn, 4940 Viking'Drive, Mpls. Jim Hill, 8200 Humboldt Ave. So., Mpls. Rodney Hardy, 4940 Viking Drive, Mpls. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Carver County Herald on February 22, 1978, and notices were mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the subject property. This public hearing is to consider rezoning 46 acres from R-lA to P-1 and subdivide into 100 lots°. The property is located south of Carver Beach Road and east of Powers Blvd. The City Planner gave his report. The Park and Recreation Commission met March 7, 1978, but the Planning Commission did not receive their input for the public hearing. Sanitary sewer and water are available to the property. The Planner recommended that Dunn and Curry prepare a landscape plan,during the final development plans, to break up the vertical relief along the arterial streets (MSAS 101 and Powers Blvd.). There is a platted paper street bisecting the property which will have to be vacated. The Council will act on this vacation. The Planner recommended the Planning Commission look with favor on this proposed PUD provided a landscape plan is prepared and develope street names that will not be confusing. He recommended that strict conservation practices be incorporated when grading is planned. Staff received a letter from Hibbert Hill questioning an element of the plan. The City Engineer will answer these concerns.in his report. The primary access to the property will be provided by MSAS 101. This is scheduled for construction -this year. All intersections shown provide for adequate site distance. Interior streets will be 28 feet wide with concrete curb and gutter. Sanitary and water service will be rovided by connection to a trunk system that was constructed as a Planning Commission Meeting March 8, 1978 -2- part of the Carver Beach project. Assessments will be levied against this development in the amount of $166,766.00. Mr. hill expressed concern about the impact of the development would have on the down stream properties, particularly the creek that abuts his property. The run off will be collected through an interior storm sewer system. The flow from about 19 acres in the north part of the proposed development will be directed to a ponding area and stored. The pond will be designed to handle -the run off from a 100 year storm. The outlet from the pond will be designed so as to reduce the outflow from the pond to about 13 to 15% of the inflow. A second pond will be constructed in the southeast part of the property. This will pick up runoff from about 9.6 acres. Water will be held in the pond and outflow will be about 15% of the inflow. The overflow from the two ponds and the runoff from the remainder of the area will flow under MSAS 101 to a low area. This drainage plan has been submitted to the Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District Board of Managers for review and comment. The hearing was opened for comments from the floor. Jim Knop - On the vacating of West 68th Street, I use part of that for a driveway. Bruce Pankonin - If the roadway were vacated by the Council you and Bob Buesgens who is your neighbor to the north, would get half of that right-of-way, Jim Knop - I think the road vacation is great. Ted Coey, 7021 Carver Beach Road - How much disruption in the general neighborhood is that going to cause by having a whole bunch of houses in there? I am most concerned about having a mess on Carver Beach Road because that's the main road that the residents in that area use to get in and out and I am not dying to have a mud bath in there. Bruce Pankonin - The primary access to this property will be from MSAS 101 which will be a much wider roadway than the Carver Beach roadway. The density of the development is about 2.45 dwelling units per net acre. That's lower than Chanhassen Estates. There will probably be about 320 people living in these 100 homes. Ted Coey - What's that going to do to that Carver Beach Park with all those kids moving in? Bruce Pankonin - This is one of the concerns we noted in our review. We note that the Carver Beach Park is really under used,and we suggested that the Park and Recreation Commission determine what type of facilities should go into Carver Beach Park so that you get more use. There will have to be park land dedication. The Park and Recreation Commission should decide what improvements should be made to this neighborhood park. The geographic area is confined,possibly some other -uses, instead of a softball diamond a tennis court or something like that, a tot lot or a park shelter. Bill Brezinsky - Construction traffic would use MSAS 101. anning Commission Meeting lurch 8, 1978' Walt Hobbs - Do those lots go right -through the ponding area in terms of title? d Hardy CBruce-Pankonin - Yes, with easements back to the city. lt Hobbs - How long is the cul-de-sac.below the pond? - It is about 450 feet. lt Hobbs - What is the variance in the lot sizes from the smallest to.the.largest? Bruce Pankonin - The lots range is size.from 10,500, the average is 16,509 square feet. Walt Hobbs - The average includes the.lots that.go through the pond. Bruce Pankonin - Yes. The overall gross density of this development is 2.4 dwelling units per acre. Walt Hobbs - From the variation in.the lot:sizes maybe we could ask the developer,what.he anticipates the variation in the cost of housing to be. .' Jim Hill - In any development obviously the size of lot is important. The size of.lot in any development in any municipality will determine.the cost of the lot including the cost of the land. in this particular case most of the lots are 85 to 110 wide so what will dictate the cost of the lot will be their location basically, not necessarily the size of the lot. The cost of a -home today not only has a lot of other factors but the cost.of the home also is what you are paying for the lot. If we make the assumption that these lots are going to be something in the order of $15,000, just for talking purposes, the homes in here are going to be $60,000 to $75,000. There is no way you are going to get around it. Roman Roos - What you are really trying to do is cover the range. Jim Hill - Yes. Al Klingelhutz - On the ponding areas, is there access to them in case the city ever has to go in there and clean them out? Jim Hill - Yes. There are easements throughout to the city. Walt Hobbs - I would like to hear the Planning Commission's comments on the smaller 10,500 square foot lots. Hud Hollenback moved to close the public hearing. Motion seconded by Dick Matthews and unanimously approved. Hearing closed at 8:20 p.m. CARVER POINTE: Members commented on Walt's question of lot sizes: Jerry Neher - I feel that many people just like myself do not want a very big lot to take care of for physical reasons and otherwise. I -have no problems with'small lots in a PUD. Hud Hollenback - Let's:assume you build the same home on a 10,000 foot lot"and a 15,000.foot lot. Are you looking at $5,000 difference? Jim Hill - The price of the.home could be equal or.the price of the home on the 1010'00 could..be in excess of the 15,000. In the City of Edina some of the -lots -are -very small and the homes. are over. l/'4 .million dollars. Lot .sizes that are equal to these are putting 1/4 million dollar homes on them. Dick Ma,tthews7- '- I would hope that with a . smaller lot. size which would more than.likely dictate a lower cost of the lot,would then accommodate a' -smaller less.expensive home which Planning Commission Meeting March 8, 1978 -4- would then allow that an individual who could afford to move in that house. What we are trying to accomplish here . is .to make a community for as many people or accommodate as many people as we can and not the 1/4 million dollar type necessarily. I would hope that it might have.the three.bedroom or.smaller home that people could afford to.move into this area. Hud Hollenback - I don't have any hang up about smaller lots. I don't really know what it can accomplish because it may, end up as expensive as a larger lot. If I were a developer I would like the smaller lots because that means more units. I have a problem with all the small lots lined up.together. . Les Bridger.I think the small lots would probably require, in most cases, a certain type of home, different in style, shape, etc. than a larger lot. I think I agree with Hud in the way that these smaller lots happen to appear in a row. Jim Hill - If you were to ignore the environmental conditions that we have today and those are the ponding areas that we now see on the property, if we said to heck with those we are going to go by code, put in 15,000 square foot lots and meet code under standard conditions, we would be able to obtain 110 lots. We recognize that runoff, siltation, erosion and natural environment, the natural amenities that we have on the site are important, not only to us as the city but also to the home buyer because he wants that kind of a neighborhood. We have planned this so that we can keep those things and by keeping those kinds of amenities that we want upstream from storm water runoff we have reduced down to 100 lots and what we are doing in order to keep the amenities that we see there today we are asking for planned development and a few lots that are less than 15,000. The overall average exceeds code. Bruce Pankonin - I doubt if the casual visitor who is driving down Redwing Lane where these lots are, will notice the difference between a 10,500 square foot lot and a 12,000 square foot lot. The thing that you feel is the width of the lot on the road and that gives you the spacing between houses. These smaller lots are 80 feet wide, 90, 90, 90, 90, 80, and 80. The lots directly north of this which are 12,000, 13,000 square feet in area start out 70, 70, 80, 80, 100. The small lots are actually wider than the large lots to the north because of the curve in the road. Les Bridger - I think it's a good plan. I guess I have got a little bit of reservation as I said earlier in agreeing with HAd on some of those smaller lots but I think generally I like the idea. I think the ponding areas and runoff situation has been handled very equitably and I think the answers to the questions that Mr. Hill had have been answered very effectively. Roman Roos - I have lived.on 40 foot lots in south Minneapolis. I guess when we are looking.at a PRD I would generally take and view it in an overall characteristic and I am looking at the dwelling units per and if we are holding 2.45,1 would have to go along.with that. We have wrestled with the 15,000 square foot problem many, many times in Planning Commission Meeting March 8, 1978 -5- the last year. Walt, :I don't -know if 15,000 is a good number or not. There is people say 12,000 should be, -some say 10,000. 3 guess if we are looking at a PRD smaller lots can be used and used very effectively in terms -.of the type -of housing they put on it. It appears there has been a fairly effective layout procedure to give you a lot that is not very narrow but has a reasonable ,squareness to -it or area to it. On that basis I can't see anything wrong with it. Walt.Hobbs - I am not hung up on 15,000 square foot lots either. I do think that you have to look at how they spacially work within the plat.: Jerry Neher moved to table action -until later this evening or until the next meeting. Motion seconded by Les.Bridger and unanimously approved. PUBLIC HEARING CHANHASSEN LAKES BUSINESS PARK Roman Roos called the hearing to:o.rder at,8:45 p.m..- The following interested persons were present: Keith Bartz,8411 Great Plains Blvd. Don and Jeff Slathar, 8508 Great Plains Blvd. Alex Krengel, 8009 Cheyenne Ivan Payne=,...7612 Kiowa Jim Benshoof, BRW Harley Robinson, 8502 Great Plains Blvd. - Don Gale, 8402 Great Plains Blvd. Al Klingelhutz, 8601'Great Plains Blvd. Walter Paulson, 8528 Great Plains -Blvd. Rod Volk, 17141 Cedar Crest Dr., Eden Prairie (Lutheran Church of the Living Christ) Richard Muggli, 410 Santa Fe Circle Wayne Holtmeier, 8524 Great Plains Blvd. Roger Casey, 8506 Great Plains Blvd. Al Sinnen, 8150 Grand View Robert.and Priscilla Armstrong, 8400 Great Plains Blvd. Doug Bloemke, 8504 Great Plains Blvd. Don Schmieg, 7703 Erie Robert and Suzan Bach, 8404 Great -Plains Blvd. Russell.and•:Edna Lawrence, 8520 Great Plains Blvd. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Carver County Herald on February 22,,1978, and notices were.mailed to property owners within 350.feet of the subject property. The public hearing is to consider rezoning approximately 276 acres from R-lA to•P-4., The property is located generally north and northwest of Lake Susan, south:of Highway 5 and east of County Road 17. Traffic circulation -to the property will be via'existing'County Road 17, new County Road 17 and a detached frontage.road parallel with Highway 5. The initial'area for development'is just -south -of -the Lutheran Church of the Living Christ and north of"Lake Susan.' The Metropolitan Council has approved Chanhassen's Comprehensive Plan that indicates this area to be industrial. Included in:the plan was a`provision for linear green space movement along the north shore of Lake Susan. This right- CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP 0 BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 MEMORANDUM DATE: March 7, 1978 TO: Planning Commission, Staff, James R. Hill, 8200 Humboldt Ave. South, Minneapolis, Rod Hardy, Dunn and Curry Real Estate Management, Inc., 4940 Viking Drive, Minneapolis, MN FROM: Bruce Pankonin, City Planner SUBJ: Preliminary Development Plan for Carvers Pointe, Chanhassen Lakes North Planned.Residential Development (PRD) APPLICANT: Dunn and Curry Real Estate Management, Inc. PLANNING CASE: P-486 Please include the following enclosures with your copy of exhibit 1, Carvers Pointe- Chanhassen Lakes North Planned Residential Develompent: ian..l �c�iro 13. Hibbert Hill's Letter dated February 27, 1978. 14. City Planner's Report dated March 7, 1978. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O. BOX 147*CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 PLANNING REPORT DATE: March 7, 1978 TO: Planning Commission, Staff, Rod Hardy and Jim Hill FROM: Bruce Pankonin, City Planner SUBJ: Preliminary Development Plan for Carvers Pointe, Chanhassen Lakes North Planned Residential Development (PRD) APPLICANT: Dunn and Curry Real Estate Management, Inc. PLANNING CASE: P-486 Background As shown in attached enclosures 1 - 14, the applicant, Dunn and Curry Real Estate Management, Inc., is proposing to rezone the subject property to P-1, Planned Residential Development and subdivide the subject property into 100 single family residential building sites. Pursuant to Planning Commission request, a public hearing was duly ordered to consider Dunn and Curry's Planned Residential Development; all adjacent property owners, within 350 feet of the subject property were _duly notified of said public hearing and an official notice of said public hearing was duly published in the Carver County Herald. Park and Recreation Commission Concern The Chanhassen Park and Recreation Commission considered Dunn and Curry's proposal at their meeting on Tuesday, March 7, 1978. I suspect the Park and Recreation Commission will have a representative in attendance at the public hearing to voice any concerns the Park and Recreation Commission may have regarding Dunn and Curry's development. Hibbert Hill's Concerns As shown in attached enclosure 13, an adjacent resident voiced numerous concerns regarding Dunn and Curry's development. Bill Brezinsky, city engineer, assures me that he will have an answer to all of the questions raised in Mr. Hill's report. 7Planning Commiss_.-,n -2- March 7r 1978 r Planner's Recommendation I strongly recommend the Planning Commission look with favor on Dunn and Curry's proposed development provided Dunn and Curry prepares a landscape plan as outlined in the city planner's report dated February 2, 1978, develops::a street naming plan so as not to be confusing and incorporates sound conservation practices as required by the city engineer. .,o,6liar. �►�� p �, �. �� r�-�Li•� � Ga �-'-- pis. 1 ,t Mr. Hibbert Hill 7075 Carver Beach Road Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 Februrary 27, 1978 The Planning Commission City of Chanhassen 7610 Laredo Deive Chanhassen, MN. 55317 Dear Commission: My property is in the northwestern part of Sec. 12. It faces on Lotus Lake. This property is bordered on the south by a drainage creek which discharges into Lotus Lake, and which extends westward into Sec. 11. The property described in the Notice of Public Hearing, dated February 10, 1978, will discharge surface drainage into this drainage creek. The City has constructed a sanitary sewer along my south boundary, and,, in this connection, has installed a number of debris dams accross the drainage creek. Development of the Dunn, and Curry real estate, as described in Notice of Public Hearing dated February 10, 1978,will increase by many times the discharge of the drainage creek described above. The high banks of this drainage are of erodable soil. Erosion has occurred slowly under natural conditions. I have, in this connection, observed the drainage creek for 15 years. The debris dams installed with the sewer construction have hastened erosion at some places. My house and yards are at the top of the bank of the above described drainage creek. I am concerned that increased erosion will endanger the house and yards. I am additionally concerned that erasion, as it is now occurring at several debris dams, will be increased and further reduce the value of my property. Eroded material carried by the drainage creek enters Lotus Lake, with damaging effects to the Lake. We oppose the proposed rezoning unless an adequate plan for the control of surface drainage from the project is prescribed by the City of Chanhassen. I request a written reply to me on the following questions: 1. Has a drainage plan been adopted? If not, when will such a plan be--- —. adopted? ` 077 2. Who prepared, or will prepare, the plan? RUNS 0 RJDC,EIVM malt aw iWANNA"W%'�. Mr. Hibbert Hill 7075 Carver Beach Road Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 2. 3. what agencies will review the plan and approve it? 4. what frequency of storms will the plan controll? 5. what is the plan? 6. Will there be a public hearing on the plan? Very trul vours Hibbe cc Mayor Hobbs Riley. Purgatory Creek Watershed District CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVEoP.O BOX 147oCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 MEMORANDUM TO: Bruce Pankonin, City Planner FROM: Fran Callahan, Community Services Director DATE: February 8, 1978 SUBJ: Carvers Pointe - Chanhassen Lakes North The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the above development at its meeting February 7, 1978. They have asked me to respond with their comments. They are as follows: Phyllis Pope stated that Western Hills Park is designated a natural passive area and 'is' not suitable'for active recreation even with 'additional, land acquisition. It is to far away from Carver Pointe to serve the children in that neighborhood. The Park and Recreation Commission feels that the Carver Pointe children would be better served with a neighborhood playground in or adjacent to the proposed development. This neighborhood playground should be provided with safe pedestrian access and provide a means to get over or under MSAS 101. Before making any recommendation, the Park and Recreation Commission would like to review the developer's total con- cept and plan for the area and after reviewal, the commission will make a formal reply to the Planning Commission and the Planner. This neighborhood playground should be designed to meet the needs of all the residents. CITY OF CHANHASSEN .AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE OF. HEARING STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) Don Ashworth being first duly sworn, on oath deposes and says that he is and was on February 21 1978 the duly qualified and acting City Clerk -Administrator of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on .said date he caused.to be mailed a copy of the attached. notice of hearing on a Proposed rezoning and subdivision of land for Dunn & Curry Real Estate in the Management City to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A" , by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mails with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer of Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn o before me this �, day of l " NQta .Public 1 !vTA Y PUBLIC - ilj Ei %ESo7A� CARVER C'!j14 J� -+_ 1y C^miss,^n EX„jr s tan. 30, 193 �y'� �'`Y �'r"V'y •� YV't'1+'v'�'r/t9V�"vV" 6'ti'V'e'V��"t1'��?C'�X Don Ashworth City Manager CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED REZONING AND SUBDIVISION OF LAND FOR DUNN AND CURRY REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT INCORPORATED, CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Planning Commission of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, will meet on Wednesday, the 8th day of March, 1978 at 7:45 p.m. at the City Hall, 7610 Laredo Drive, Chanhassen, Minnesota, for the purpose of holding a public hearing to consider rezoning the following described property from Rl-A Agricultural Residential pi.st.rict to P--1, Planned Residential District, and to subdivide the property into 100 residential lots. The proposed rezoning and subdivision. of Land involves the following described parcel of land DESCRIPTION: Lots 1301 and 1302, CARVER BEACH, according to the recorded plat thereof. That part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 116North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as follows; Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 1301, CARVER BEACH, according to the recorded plat thereof; thence southerly along the west line of said Lot 1301 to the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly along the south lines of Lots 1301, 1302, 1303, 1304, and 1352 in said, plat to a point thereon distant 1.44 feet westerly of the southeast corner of said Lot 1352; thence southerly to the northwest corner of lot 1839 in said plat; thence southerly along the west line of said Lot 1839 to the southwest corner thereof; thence westerly along the north line of Grove Road (now known as West 68th Street) as dedicated in said plat of Carver Beach, to the east, line of Excelsior Road (now known as CSAH No. 17) as dedicated in said plat of Carver Beach; thence northerly along said east line to the south line of Juniper Road (now known as Carver Beach Road) as dedicated in said plat of Carver Beach; thence easterly along the south line of said Juniper Road to the point of beginning. That part of. the Southeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 2222, Carver Beach, according to the recorded plat thereof; thence southerly along the west line of said Lot 2222 to the southwest corner thereof; thence easterly along the south lines of Lots 2222 and 2223 in said plat to the northwest corner of Lots 2259 in said plat; thence southerly along the west line of said Lot 2259 and its southerly extension to the center line of Forest Road as dedicated in said plat of Carver Beach; thence easterly along said center line to the westerly line of Highland Drive (now known as Nez Perce) as dedicated in said plat; thence southerly along said westerly line and the same extended southerly to the center line of Dogwood Road as shown on said plat of Carver Beach; thence North 88 degrees 31 minutes 20 seconds west (assumed bearing) along the center line of said Dogwood Road a distance of 150.45 feet; thence northwesterly, 507.92 feet, along a curved line concave to the southwest having a radius of 548.82 feet and a chord bearing of North 61 degrees 17 minutes 41 seconds West; thence North 87 degrees 48 minutes 27 seconds West, tangent to last described curve, a distance of 1,097.89 feet to the east line of Excelsior Road (now known as CSAH 17) as dedicated in said plat; thence northerly along said east line to the south line of Grove Road (now known as West 68th Street) as dedicated in said plat; thence easterly along the south line of said Grove Road to the point of beginning. A plan showing said proposed rezoning and subdivision is available for inspection at the City Hall. All persons interested may appear and be heard at said time and place. BY ORDER OF THE PLANNING COPaMISSION Bruce Pankonin, Zoning Administrator Dated: February 10, 1978 (Publsh.i.n the Carver County Herald on February 22, 1978). V: Ri,char3 R. Torrance Dennis P. Kerber Rt. 7 Box 646 John P. Kerber Rt. 4 Box 920 Excelsior, Mn. 55331 7241 Powers Blvd. Excelsior, Mn. 55331, ' Excelp$ or, Mn. 55331 Theodore Coey Glenn Ames Keith H. South 7021 Carver Beach Rd. 6660 Powers Blvd. 7025 Carver Beach Rd. Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Paul P. Palmer Louis Woitalla R. L. Peterson Chanhassen Rd. 6740 Powers Blvd. 2040 W. 65th St. Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Arnold Chulik Jerry Pope Hibbert Hill 7035 Carver Beach Rd. 7035 Carver Beach Rd. 7075 Carver Beach Rd. Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Austin Lange Janet Moulton Hansen & Klingelhutz 5512 Merritt Circle 7205 Carver Beach Rd. 516 Del Rio Drive Edina, Mn. Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Chanhassen, Mn. 55317 Malcom A. & L. MacAlpine Donald B. Miller, Jr. James C. Reger 512 Frontier Trail 510 Frontier Trail 508 Frontier Trail Chanhassen, Mn. 55317 Chanhassen, Mn. 55317 Chanhassen, Mn. 55317 R. J. & Betty Angelucci John D. Myskevitz Thomas Girtz 3317 Arthur St. N.E. 920 Glendale 981 W. 67th St. Mpls., Mn. 55418 Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Exc., Mn. 55331 Kenneth Morrill Donald Hagen Twin City Federal 880 Glendale Dr. 1014 Exc. Ave. N. 6725 Nez Perce Exc., Mn. 55331 Hopkins, Mn. 55343 Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Wallace Christiansen Emma Wiest Ernst Herman Rt. 7 Box 804 840 Carver Beach Rd. 991 W. 67th St. Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Exc., Mn. 55331 Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Harlan Koehnen John Christofferson Jauner Ernst Rt. 5 Box 249 1885 Dayton 6735 Nez Perce Excelsior, Mn. 55331 St. Paul, Mn. 55104 Excelsior, Mn.. 55331 Raymond Olson, Jr. 841 Carver Beach Rd. Cecil Reader Thomas ?ayno.rd . L7'7 Im W-, v Tri cac.? n'] A 'r—r :Iry Alfred Swenson Donald B. Anderson lst Guaranty Corp. 4651 Grand Ave.S. 2851 Washta Bay Rd. 7035 Wayzata Blvd.. Minneapolis, Mn. Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Mpls., Mn. 55426 Frank Mitchell Robert J. Buesgens James Wegler 325 So. llth St. Apt.B 6790 Nez Perce 834 Forest Rd. Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Chanhassen, Mn. 55317 Excelsior, Mn. 55331 K. H. Gustafson Charles D. Fisher Bruce Sparrman % John E. Story 855 Forest Rd. Rt. 7 W. 68th St. 6795 Nez Perce Exc., Mn. 55331- Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Eugene Drum Dwight & Alice Tmko Jurgen Johnson 825 Forest Rd. 810 W. 68th St. 832 Elm Rd. Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Excelsior, Mn. 55331 James Knop Roy Giese James Wegler 6800 Nez Perce 832 Elm Rd. Rt. 7 Box 664 Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Exc., Mn. 55331 Chanhassen, Mn. 55317 Vernon Kerber Daniel Welsh Clystine Wilson Rt. 4 Box 850 825 W. 68th St. 5239 Black Friars Ln. Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Mtka., Mn. 55343 Bill Moore Paul Olson Richard Rossing 845 W. 68th St. % Richard Rossing Rt. 7 Box 686 Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Rt. 7 Box 686 Exc., Mn. 55331 Excelsior, Mn. 55331 Edwin Wiest Michael Hibbard James Stodola 6723 Russell Ave. N. 6620 Grand Ave. S. 7000 Carver Beach Rd. Mpls., Mn. St. Paul, Mn. 55423 Exc., Mn. 55331 John Paulson Elizabeth Sweeney Raymond Gritche 7030 Carver Beach Rd. 1121 Greenwood Dr. Rt. 4 Box 916 Chanhassen, Mn. 55317 Exc., Mn. 55331 Exc., Mn. 55331 D.R.C. Ortenblad John Mauritz Laird Norton Co. 1351 Lake Lucy Rd. 6810 Tecumseh Lane 125 W. 5th St. Exc., Mn. 55331 Exc., Mn. 55331 Winona, Mn. 55987 Lemont Sanders 6960 Redman Ln Merlyn Kinkel Robert Hruska Chanhassen Mn. 55317 6950 Redman Ln. -6940 Red"an Fin o Joseph�wrDathy 6930 Redman Ln. Chanhasse n 55317 Richard Kairies 1411 Greenwood Chan., Mn. 55317 John Kurimchak 1301 Greenwood Dr. Exc., Mn. 55331 Jerome Pilkington Rt. 4 Box 887 Exc., Mn. 55331 Wm. Engebretson 1401 Greenwood Dr. Exc., Mn. 55331 Gary Laurent 1428 Hampshire Ave. S. St. Louis Park, Mn. 55426 Gary LXjdrent et al e nold 1428/XampXhiie Ave. S. �r13 Re man Circle St. // Exc., Mn. 55331 Dale Gregory 6961 Redman Ln . Exc., Mn. 55331 Names Way 1311 Greenwood Dr. Exc., Mn. 55331 Rodney Mielke 6227 Pleasant Ave. S. Minneapolis, Mn. 55423 Mr. Hibbert Hill 7075 Caryer Beach Road � Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 c.� V F rve t 10 ' fte re pArt or a"* 10. * rt. Plaw on X Via ' ? UP dover'Obed I 'Ri c 116W6 of ftba k #: 4u' fie- > g, 10,t I , Li ,• Jj: `. 9 facto IuU Wo dr4ap& e fit. ..Iip��Iijpjj III 11111�11�111 III Ag - -.-#, Of * 'i, 'a - 40" desaribW. T. .. !y. an*** tia`i+ oxmmtd ,' - m , • i.'. ftValmvW 4OW-- f' - t,rrI'at. 4 ,.y;r .4 40 w v dam., vdU a-G. m ',-=-a.l 1. "'.. ftrthor roulme tho of s t^.s. e`er . .x , r,+. F•. [�• ,,r; 414 - Y'. rrMI'i ,' M111111,1111111 :y:t•'1 4 F. El r; ry < x.:-, Y 4 *:! "i :6' : .r ua♦ , s.. 4 ',.�R: '7. :',f'.. a 4. _t' ,"`�;• .� .._11;,Y: Y - 7�, � ♦o acv w ` L' f•:-: t.> t -•. Y L. F �Ya.' <'=4 ..#._ f ,ti• �:.'{� w r. ,ris ..1F �;�'4.'1 .,gam M ER r Y tx o, } s e FEB 1978 RECEIVED Y "Gim OF L MINK r Mr. Hibbert Hill 7075 Carver Beach Road Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 3. Uhat agencies w= review the plan approve it? 4. V&at frequency of eterms win ths plan controlli $. 'ghat is this p1m ? 6. Mill there be a public hearing on the playa? cc Mayor Hobbs ,dl$Y« Purgatory Crook Watershed District 2. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O. BOX 1476CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 ME, MORANDUM DATE: February 2, 1978 TO: Planning _Commission, Staff, James R. South, Rod Hardy, Dunn and Curry Real 4940 Viking Drive, Minneapolis, MN FROM: Bruce Pankonin, City Planner Hill, 8200 Humboldt Ave. Estate Management, Inc., SUBJ: Preliminary Development Plan Review for Carver's Pointe, Chanhassen Lakes North Planned Residential Development (PRD) APPLICANT: Dunn and Curry Real Estate Management, Inc. PLANNING CASE: P-486 Attached hereto, for your review and consideration, are the following exhibits submitted in support of Dunn and Curry's proposed Carver's Pointe - Chanhassen Lakes North Planned Residential Development (PRD): Enclosures 1. Application for Consideration of Planning Request dated Jan. 27, 1978. 2. Community Location Graphic. 3. Procedures for Planned Residential Developments. 4.. Carver's Pointe - Chanhassen Lakes North, "Fact Sheet". 5. Preliminary Plat dated January 6, 1978. 6. Setback and Lot Areas dated January 6, 1978. 7. Development Plan dated January 6, 1978. 8. Proposed Utilities dated January 6, 1978. 9. City Engineer's report dated January 31, 1978. 10. Building Inspector's Report dated January 31, 1978. 11. Fire Marshal's report dated January 31, 1978. 12. City Planner's report dated February 2, 1978. pl- -14 Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed' District Mr. William Brezinsky Schoell and Madsen 50 Ninth Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 Re: Chanhassen. Lakes North Development Dear Mr. Brezinsky: 8950 COUNTY ROAD u4 ED-EN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55343 City Administrator RdAdd Toe April 13, 1978f�+l�` 0J , -%� The engineering advisors to the Board of Managers of the Riley -Purgatory Creek Watershed District have reviewed the preliminary plans as submitted to the Distrct"for the above referenced project. The following policies and criteria of the.District are applicable to this.project. 1. A grading and land alteration permit application mpst be submitted to the Watershed District for this project. This permit application should be accompanied by an erosion con- trol. plan outlining how sediment will be prevented from leaving the development site both during and after construc- tion. 2. More detailed information must be submitted to the District regarding the proposed ponding areas on the development site. 3. A.detail.ed design of the proposed ditch system must be sub- mitted to the District. Due to the large tributary drainage area to the ditch, the.District requests that the developer investigate the possibility of providing an enclosed storm water system instead of the ditch as the parcels develop. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this development. If you have any questions regarding the District's comments, please contact us at 920-0655. AG/yc cc: Mr. Conrad Fiskness Mr. Frederick Richards City of Chanhassen Sincerely, Allan Gebhard BARR ENGINEERING CO. Engineer for the District �y AJIDR 1978 a`ti v1eir op i •r `� �HAssF�ft „�I Riley- Purgatory Creek Watershed District 8950 COUNTY ROAD 94 ,,EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55343 April 12, 1978 Mr. William Brezinsky Schoell & Madsen 50 - 9th Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 Re: Chanhassen Lakes North Development Dear Mr. Brezinsky: The engineering advisors to the Board of Managers of the Riley -Purgatory Creek Watershed District has reviewed the preliminary plans as submitted to the District for the above referenced project. The following policies and criteria of the District are applicable to this project. 1. A grading and land alteration permit. application must be submitted to the Watershed District for this project. This permit applica- tion should be accompanied by an erosion control plan outlining how sediment will be prevented from leaving the development site during and after construction. 2. More detailed information must be submitted to the District regarding the proposed ponding areas on'the development site. 3. A detailed design of the proposed ditch system must be submitted to the District. Due to the large tributary drainage area to the ditch,. the District requests that the developer investigate the possibility of providing an enclosed storm water system instead of the ditch as the parcels develop. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this development. If you have any questions regarding the District's comments, please contact us at 920-0655. Sincerely, Illan Gebhard, BARR ENGINEERING CO. Engineer for the District IC)) OR 1$�8 c AG/111 ,� V� C AD R cc: Mr. Conrad Fiskness `r- CNaNNaL'�9. Mr. Frederick Richards City of Chanhassen N vV-221 Rev. 74 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT of NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Waters, Soils and Minerals NOTIFICATION OF PERMIT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT Minnesota Statutes, Section 105.44, Subdivision 1, requires you to supply a complete copy and all supporting data of your water permit application to the following: A) The chief executive officer of the city or township within which the project is located. B) The secretary of the Board of Managers of the watershed district, if any, within which your project is located or which your project may affect. You MUST certify having served the complete application on the above in the box on the back side of the appli+ration form W-54. IN ADDITION, if your project is NOT located in a city, a complete copy and all supporting data of the application should be submitted to the Administrator of the Shoreland Manage- ment Program for the affected county. Complete this form for each notice served on a local government official. SECTION I (TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT) TO: A) Chief executive officer of the (check) = city, Q township of Chanhassen ___— (print or type nw7ie) B) Secretary of the board of managers of the _watershed district. (print or type none) C) Administrator of the shoreland management program of county. (print or type name) FROM: New Horizon Homes _ Date: Augusts 1978 —Tpri'nt or type name and address of app icant' F INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT This report from provides you an opportunity to submit input to the Department of Natural Resources to assist in deciding whether to grant, modify, or deny the requested permit. It is NOT absolutely necessary for local agencies to officially approve or disapprove the project or make any recommendation, although this may be done if desired. It is requested that local agencies indicate the following, as applicable: A. The relationship 'of the proposed project to local plans for the affected water and related land. B. The relationship of the project to local land use controls including flood plain and/or shoreland regulations. (continued on reverse side) 11 W- 54 STATE OF MINNESOTA Rtv. 74 DEPARTMENT of NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Waters, Soils & Minerals APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO WORK IN PUBLIC WATERS New Hnri7nn Homes, , the owner of land in Government lot(s) , (print or type applicant's name) quarter sections) , section(s) , township no.(s) _ range(s) S. E. Quadrent of Co. Rd. 17 , Carver Beach —Road , (fire no., box no. or address) (Zot, Hock & subdivision) county(ies) Carver which is riparian to N. _ _,name of a�reT applies pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 105 and ether applicable statutes for a permit to work in the public water(s) named above, in accordance with all data, maps, plans, and other information submitted herewith and made a part hereof. PROPOSAL IT IS PROPOSED TO: excavate, fill, Q construct, Q remove, (check) Q install, Q abandon, or QJ other(specify) THE FOLLOWING: Q dam, Q shore -protection, Q shoreline ,� harbor, = channel, + ' bridge, (check) = culvert, Q wharf, Q obstruction, or / n / other (specify) _ Pond _ (- 3 & 1 _ _ -_ _ - JUSTIFICATION Explain why this project is needed: To allow this development of land abutting Carver Beach Road and to provide proper and efficient implimentation of a drainage plan utilizing the pond for storage. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 1. Anticipated changes in water and related land resources: Placement of approximately 4000 Cu Yds of material on North Slope of Pond (See Development Grading Plan). Beginning of S.W. Corner will allow approximate equi vi lent storage. 2. Unavoidable but anticipated detrimental effects: Siltation during construction. (Note: To be controlled by suitable Erosion Control Devi ces . 3. Alternatives to the action proposed: Do not fill. Cannot develop. PROJECT SITE DATA 1. Describe the type and amount of aquatic vegetation present: Small amount of cattails is present in one isolated portion of the Pond. Remainder is upland grasses. Standing water is intermitent. 2. Describe the nature of the material beneath the water: Unknown 3. Describe the nature of the upland area: Upland Grasses on Rolling Slopes; Scattered trees. 4. Describe type and amount of nearby shoreland development: No development adjacent to Pond. Single Family North & East. 5. ENCLOSE SKETCH DESCRIBING WATER LEVEL FLUCTUATIONS. (see instructions) (continued on reverse side) ATTACH EXTRA SHEETS IF NECESSARY An Expansion of Soil Engineering Services, Inc. M U 11' ENGINEERING TESTING MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL 6880 S. County Rd. 18, P.O. Box 35108, Mpls., Mn. 55435 / 612-941-5600 J. S. BRAUN P. E., President I NORTHERN MINNESOTA 3219 E. 19th Avenue, Hibbing, MN. 55746I 218-263-8869 P. H. AN UE RSON, vice Pres. Operations I CENTRAL MINNESOTA 200 Osseo Avenue No., St. Cloud, Mn. 56301 / 612-253-9940 C.G. KRUSE P. E., Vice Pres. Engineering March 71, 1978 Dunn & Curry Real Estate Investment Co. 4940 Viking Drive Edina, Minnesota SS435 Attn: Mr. Rodney Hardy Re: 78-OS1 SOILS INVESTIGATION Carver's Point Chanhassen Lakes North Chanhassen, Minnesota Gentlemen: As you requested, we have recently,conducted a soils investi- gation on the above referenced site. The investigation consisted of 8 standard penetration test borings taken to aid in evaluating subsurface soil and groundwater conditions relevent to the support of the proposed single,family dwellings. Design information furnished consists of a grading plan. This plan indicates that the tract, consisting of approxi- mately 49 acres, will be subdivided into 100 single family dwellings, all subject to HUD -FHA financing. Based on the results of our recent investigation, it is our opinion that the natural soils encountered throughout the majority of the site are generally acceptable as foundation materials for the proposed dwellings and anticipated fills. In the northeast corner of the tract, boring ST-4 encountered a slightly organic silty clay swamp deposit, extending to a depth of approximately 9 feet. These materials should be removed prior to filling. . The attached report contains the results of the borings, our engineering analysis and recommendations, as well as a tabulation indicating those lots to which HUD -FHA Data Sheet 79g specifications for construction of single family dwellings on fill will apply. CONSULTING ENGINEERSISOILS AND MATERIALS Test Borings • Foundation Engineering and Recommendations • Inspection of Construction • Material Testing of Soils, Concrete and Building Components 78-051 Dunn & Curry Real Estate Investment Company -2- March 7, 1978 It has been our pleasure to provide engineering services on this project. If we can be of further assistance in evaluating this data or in providing additional investigative services and/or quality control inspection and testing services as the project progresses, kindly contact us at your convenience. Very truly yours, RAUN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. 0�._1.i.✓lip-r= F� �V 4l \. Dennis M. Riotschel Engineering Geologist C. G. Kruse, P.E. Vice President - Enginee.-ing DMR/CGK:skh cc: James R. Hill, Inc. The content of Ihis report and supporting documents are for the exclusive use of the addressee. In the absence of our prior written approval rnr make- no representation and assume no responsibility to any other parties req--hny ,uch content. BRAU,17� ENGINEERING TESTING J IMarch 7, 1978 A. INTRODUCTION: A.1. Purpose: The purpose of the investigations was to provide subsurface information for use in design of the proposed development. A.2. Scope: A total of eight standard penetration test borings were taken at the locations indicated on the attached sketch. An engineering report analyzing the effects of the subsurface conditions relative to the design and construc- tion of the proposed development, subject to approval of HUD -FHA 79g requirements, was requested. A.3. Available Information: A topographic.grading and drainage plan by James R. Hill, Inc. and dated January 31, 1978, was provided for our use at the time the borings were taken. A site reconnaissance was conducted by this writer prior to our investigation in February of this year. It was noted that the site is currently being used for agricutural purposes. The site consists of gently rolling upland topo- graphy with elevations ranging from about 990 to 1020. In the northcentral and northeast portion of the tract, the topography slopes down somewhat to low areas with ponded water noted nearer the northeast corner. A.4. Boring locations & Elevations: The boring locations were c osen by our firm to obtain an overview of the salient conditions throughout the site. The boring locations were interpolated from the topographic site plan provided for our use. Surface elevations were referenced to the to.) of a manhole cover situated at the centerline of Carver'Beach Road, approximately 1500 feet east where Carver Beach Road ' intersects with County Road 17. A surface elevation of 1020.0 was given for this bench mark. A.S. Field Testing $ Sampling: The borings were taken on February 23 through 27, 1978. Due to the snowy conditions and the undulating topography of the site, the borings were conducted with a trailer -mounted core and auger drill unit, towed by a small dozer. The borings were conducted in accordance with ASTM D1586 "Penetration Test and Split Barrel Sampling of Soils". Using this method, the bare hole is advanced with the hollow -stem auger to the desired test depth. Then a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches drives a standard 2-inch OD split barrel sampler a total penetration of 12 feet below the tip of the hollow -stem auger. The blows for the last foot of penetration are recorded and are an index of soil strength characteristics. Use of the hollow -stem auger eliminated the driving of casing and the need for jetting water. RRAUII� ENGINEERING TESTING t 78-051 Dunn & Curry Real Estate Investment Company -4- March 7, 1978 A.6. Soil Classification: Mineral soils encountered in the borings were visually and manually classified in the field by the crew chief in accordance with ASTM D2487 "Unified Soils Classification System" and ASTM D2488 "Recommended Practice for Visual and Manual Description of Soils". A copy of ASTM D2487 is attached. All samples were then returned to the laboratory for verification of the field classifications by a Soils Engineer. Representative samples will remain in this office for period of 60 days to be available for your examination. A.7. Groundwater Determinations: The borings were probed. with the hollow -stem auger in the ground immediately after rtaking the final sample in the bottom of the individual borings for the presence of groundwater. In addition, immediately after removal of the auger, the borings were again probed and the depth to cave-in and the presence or absence of water was noted. Groundwater levels can be expected to show seasonal and annual flucations. B. RESULTS: B.1. Lois: Soil strata encountered in the borings, penetra- tion resistances, and groundwater level observations are plotted on the attached Log of Boring sheets. B.2. Soils Encountered: With the exception of borings ST-4 and ST-8, all of the moorings encountered from 1. to 3 feet of silty clay or clayey sand topsoils, underlain by silty clayey sand, clayey sand, or sandy clay glacial tills to their 20 to 2S-foot respective termination depths. Boring ST-8, although encountering similar till soils beneath the S-foot depth to its 2S-foot termination depth, encountered a slightly silty sand from the surface to the 5-foot depth. Boring ST-4, as indicated earlier, encountered a slightly organic, silty clay swamp deposit fcom the surface to a depth of 9 feet. This material was in turn underlain by sandy clay glacial tills to the 25-foot termination depth of this boring. B.2.a. Penetration ;resistances: Penetration resistances recorded in the glacial till soils as encountered, ranged between 7 and 30 blows per foot(BPF), indicating these materials to be medium to very stiff in consistency. The non -cohesive sandy material as encountered in boring ST-8 appeared to be in a medium dense condition, while the swamp deposits as indicated in boring ST-4 appear to be very soft to rather soft in consistency. BRAU11" ENGINEERING TESTING 78-051 Dunn & Curry Real Estate Investment Company -5- March 7, 1978 B.3. Groundwater Levels: Groundwater was not encountered in any of the borings at the time of the initial probing, the exception being ST-4, where groundwater was encountered at the 10-foot depth. Upon removal of the auger, ground- water was generally encountered in all of the borings, ranging between the 161-, and 22-foot depth below existing surfaces. Again, the exception was boring ST-4', where groundwater was encountered at the 3-foot depth (elev. 1002.5). Groundwater will normally follow the contours of the topography and appears to fluctuate between elevation 978 and 993 throughout the site. In the northeast portion of the tract, the ponded water in this area appears to be due to "perched" water conditions, which is common in the soil types encountered on the site. C. ANALYSIS & RECOMMENDATIONS: C.1. Proposed Structures: It is our understanding that a total of 100 single family residences will be developed on the site. Finished grades are as shown on the topographic layout furnished. C.2. HUD -FHA 79g Requirements: FIIA 79g requirements indi- cate that if.any lot in a subdivision has ,footings on fill or if the depth of fill. beneath house or garage floor slabs exceeds those allowed by the "Minimum Property Standards", construction control observation and testing by a qualified Soils Engineer is required on all lets. FHA requires that all floor slabs be located a minimum of 4 feet above the known water table. C.3. Construction on Natural Soils: Where cutting to grade is requl er d an allowable bearing capacity up to 2000 pounds per square foot (psf) could be used. Those lots where sub - cutting to achieve final grading is anticipated are the following: Block Lot 1-------------------- 11-14, 20, 21, 29-31, and 36 3---------2-12, 16, 20-23, 26-28 and 30 4-------------------- 4-9, and 15 Based on the information from the soil borings and the topo- graphy, the soils encountered on these .lots appear to be acceptable foundation soil for proposed single family dwellings, without additional soil preparation. However, IIIJD-FIIA 79g requires that all of the lots be inspected by a qualified Soils Engineer at footing grade prior to construction since localized subcutting may be required. BRAUH.-` ENGINEERING TESTING I - - - - * I 78-OS1 Dunn $ Curry Investment Real Estate Company -6- March 7, 1978 C.4. Construction on Fill: On the remainder of the lots, varying amounts of fill will be required below footings or floor slabs. The depth of fill requirements appear to range from 1 foot to approximately 12 feet. We recommend that all topsoils and other deleterious materials not encoun- tered by the borings be completely removed from house areas prior to placement of the fill. Again, the bottom of all excavations should be inspected by a qualified Soils Engineer to evaluate the soils between the borings. Oversizing of the excavations will be required for lateral stability of the f - 11. Replacement fill soil can be of any debris -free, mineral soil placed in thin lifts and thoroughly and uniformly compacted to a minimum of 89% and a minimum average of 90% of modified Proctor density (ASTM DISS7-70;. A number of compaction tests should be taken to evaluate the densities obtained. C.S. Groundwater Data: As final grading indicates, signi- ficant amounts of fill will be placed in the northeastern portion of the tract where groundwater was encountered closer to the surface. Prior to placement of the anticipated fills in these areas, this groundwater should be removed prior to placement of backfills to allow for adequate inspec- tions. With the proposed floor elevations, drainage plan, and the observed groundwater elevations throughout the tract, it is our opinion that groundwater depths will be below that specified minimum required for FHA approval. D. GENERAL REMARKS: The analysis and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the 8 soil borings performed at the locations indicated on the attached sketch. Variations may occur between these borings, the nature and extent of which may not become evident until construction. If variations are encountered, it will be necessary to make a re-evaluation of the recommendations of this report after performing on -site observations during the construction and noting the characteristics of any variations. Such varia- tions may result in additional foundation costs and it is suggested that a contingency be provided for this purpose. To permit correlation of the soil data obtained to date with the actual soil conditions encountered during construction and to provide continuing professional responsibility for the conformance of the construction to the concepts originally contemplated in this report and to the plans and specifics-. tions, it is recommended that: we be retained to develop and perform the necessary observation and testing prolimun* the excavation and foundation phases of the proje ENGINEERING TESTING 78-051 Dunn & Curry Real Estate Investment Company -7- March 7, 1978 If others perform the recommended observations and/or testing of construction, professional responsibility becomes divided since in doing so, they assume responsibility for verifying that the soil conditions throughout the construction areas are similar to those encountered in the borings or recognizing variations which would require a change in recommendations. BRAUII'� ENGINEERING TESTING LOG OF BORING PROJECT: 78-051 Foundation Investigation Proposed Housing Development Carver Point -Chanhassen Lakes No. Chanhassen., Minnesota ASTM Elev. Depth D2487 Description of Materials 1006.7 0 Symbol (ASTM: D2488) SANDY CLAY, dark brown, frozen. CL (Topsoil) 004.7 2 G 0 992,7 14 v -- - 4 a� ON al I CL v v` _0 986.2 2U.5 v -- N C v v ar' V) PrUwy CL 9RAU11* ENGINEERING TESTING BC)RING, ST-1 LQCATI O N: See Attached Sketch. DATE: 2/23/78 SCALE: P=4' L i Tests or Notes B PF SILTY CLAYEY SAND, fine to medium - grained, with a trace of fine to 15 medium Gravel, brown mottled with reddish and grayish brown, wet to moist, stiff to very stiff. - (Glacial Till) 14 14 19 26 SANDY CLAY, with a trace of fine Gravel, grayish brown to gray, moist, very stiff to stiff. 25 (Glacial Till) Water level not encountered with 20' of hollow -stem auger in grou Water level down 162' 15 minutes after completion of boring. 15 Bench Mark: Top of Manhole Cover located approximately 1.500' E Of •(L Intersection of Carver Beach Road and County I:oad #17, (fron of 940 Carver Beach Road), with elevation given = 1020.0'. ❑ O 0 c .E v a 0 •U w c ❑ c 0 ❑ v > w `o N ❑ Q L c v V) -o c v n N v m Un LOG OF BORING a V�I _. � UN-0 ENGTINEERING TESTING PROJECT: 78-051 Foundation Investigation aCRING, s' 2 LOCATION: Proposed Housing Development Carver Point -Chanhassen Lakes No. Chanhassen, Minnesota See Attached Sketch. DATE:2/23/78 ISCA LE: 1"=4' ASTM Tests or Notes Elev. Depth D2487 Description of Materials BPF 998.7 0 Symbol (ASTM: D2488) SILTY CLAY, black, frozen. CL (Topsoil) 995.7 3 SILTY CLAYEY SAND, fine to medium- SM-SC grained, with a trace of fine to medium Gravel, brown mottled with -- reddish and grayish brown, wet to 15 moist, medium to very stiff to stiff. (Glacial Till) 24 19 986.7 12 CL SANDY CLAY, with a few lenses of, SAND, with a trace of fine to --- 13 medium Gravel, grayish brown to gray, moist to wet, stiff to very stiff. (Glacial Till) 15 978.2 _ 20-5_ - --- -- 21 ---- __- —__ _ Water level not encountered with ' 20' of hollow -stem auger in ground. Water level down 18' 10 minutes after completion of boring. LOG OF BORING BRAUH ENGINEERING TESTING PROJECT: 78-051 Foundation Investigation • ST-3. Proposed Housing Development LOCATION: Carver Point -Chanhassen Lakes No Chanhassen, Minnesota See Attached Sketch. DATE: 2/23/ 78 ASTM Tests Elev, Depth D2487 Description of Materials BPF 11000.3 0 Symbol (ASTM: D2488) SILTY CLAY, black, frozen, 998,3 2 CL (Topsoil) . SANDY CLAY, with a trace of fine cr, CL Gravel, brown mottled with grayish 6 obrown, moist, medium tp rather . stiff. L_ (Glacial Till) 0 >E 993.3 >I u r.9 0 977. ��974.8 01 a) tA 7 10 SILTY �L1lYEY- BA�dif, - 1. n e o m e c7 i um- SM-SC grained, with a trace of fine to 19 medium Gravel, grayish brown mottled with reddish brown, moist, stiff. (Glacial Till) 14 23 _-- CL 25.5 SANDY CLAY, with a trace of fine to medium Gravel, gray, wet, very stiff. (Glacial Till) Water level not encountered with 25' of hollow -stem auger in grou Water level down 22' 15 minutes after completion of boring. 14 1 15 1 18 18 CA LE • 1 "=4 ' or Notes' LOV OF BORING PROJECT: 78-051 Foundation Investigation Proposed Housing Development Carver Point -Chanhassen Lakes No. Chanhassen, Minnesota ASTM Elev. Depth D2487 Description of Materials 1005.5 0 Symbo I (ASTM: D2488) SILTY CLAY, slightly organic, CL black, frozen to 21�' to wet, very stiff to rather soft. (Swamp Deposit) 0 0 0 c E a� a) 996.51 9 a� al I Ell I .2 I I a� 0 0 • .. MI -a 0 0 Ln �d 980.1 9"_ Ln I BRAIM , ENGINEERING TESTING ST-4 LOCATION: See Attached Sketch. DATE: 2/24/78 SCALE:2/24/78 L j Tests or Notes B PF 4 SANDY CLAY, with a trace of fine CL to medium Gravel, grayish brown mottled with yellowish brown, 7 waterbearing, medium to very stiff. (Glacial Till) 14 ICI SANDY CLAY, with a trace of fine y ra, wet very — CL Gravel g y stiff. 17 (-'lacial Till) Water level down 10' with 25' of hollow -stem auger in ground. Water level down 3' 15 minutes after completion of boring. a LOG OF BORING PROJECT: 78_051 Foundation Investigation Proposed Housing Development Carver Point -Chanhassen Lakes No. Chanhassen, Minnesota ENGINEERING TESTING 10RING: ST-5 LOCATION: See Attached Sketch. DATE: 2/23/78 $CA LE:1"=4' ASTM Tests or Notes Elev. Depth D2487 Description of Materials BPF 1006.2 0 Symbol (ASTM: D2488) SANDY CLAY, dark brown, frozen. l004 . CL (Topsoil) 2 _ SILTY CLAYEY SAND, fine to medium- = SM-SC grained, with a trace of fine to 15 d medium Gravel, with a few layers _o c of SANDY CLAY, grayish brown �L_ mottled with yellowish brown, ' moist, very stiff. 20 (Glacial Till) a u 17 a� 0 18 c 0 17 2 0 v 20 �° 988.2 18 SANDY CLAY, with a trace of fine CL Gravel, gray, wet, very dense. -00 985.7 20.5 (Glacial Till) 22 o— - --- -- — — — 0 rater level not encountered with 0, of hollow -stem auger in ground 'Water level down 19' 15 minutes � d ifter completion of boring. I LOG OF BORING ENGINEERING TESTING PROJECT: 78-051 Foundation Investigation • ST-6 Proposed Housing Development LOCATION: Carver Point -Chanhassen Lakes No. Chanhassen, Minnesota See Attached Sketch. DATE: 2/27/78 SCALE. 111=49i ASTM rests or Notes Elev, Depth D2487 Description of Materials BPF WL 1010.2 0 Symbol (ASTM: D2488) CLAYEY SAND, fine to medium- 1008.2 2 - - Sc, grained, dark brown, frozen, (Topsoil) CLAYEY SAND, fine to medium - SC grainee., with a trace of fine 15 cGravel, grayish brown, moist, . stiff to very stiff. E (Glacial Till) 14 u .v 1001.2 9. 23 SM-SC SILTY CLAYEY SAND, fine to medium- -D grained, with a trace of fine 24 a Gravel, grayish brown mottled with reddish brown, moist to .o wet, very stiff. v (Glacial Till) 26 a > 23 N a� _o f CL 00 989.7 20.5 a- - - -- - --- - 30 N Water level not encountered with 20' of hollow -stem auger .in groun(. 0 Water level down 17' 10 minutes o after completion of boring. QL a) ce- o� N LOG OF BORING ENGINEERING TESTING PROJECT: 78-051 Foundation Investigation • ST-7 Proposed Housing Development LOCATION: Carver Point -Chanhassen Lakes No. Chanhassen, Minnesota See Attached Sketch. [DATE- 2/27/78 SCALE: 1"=4' ASTM Tests or Notes Elev. Depth D2487 Description of Materials BPf 1002.2 0 Symbol.(ASTM: D2488) SANDY CLAY, dark brown, frozen. 1000.2 2 CL (Topsoil) SILTY CLAYEY SAND, fine to medium- cr,SM-SC grained, with a trace of fine to 21 c . medium Gravel, light brown mottled with reddish brown, E moist, stiff to very stiff. o(Glacial Till) 16 n U N C 0 c 0 0 v v o` a� 0 '1983. 2 I 19 981.7 20.5 CL o - -- of I 22 30 23 26 SANDY CLAY, with a trace of fine to medium Gravel, ,rays wet, 22 *very stiff. (Glacial Till.) Water level not encountered with 20' of hollow -stem auger in grounc Water level down 19' 15 minutes after completion of boring. LOG OF BORING RAl1�I ENGINEERING TESTING PROJECT: 78-051 Foundation Investigation ST-8 Proposed Housing Development LOCATION: Garver Point -Chanhassen Lakes No. Chanhassen, Minnesota See Attached Sketch. DATE: 2/24/78 SCALE: 1"-4' ASTM Tests or Notes Elev. Depth D2487 Description of Materials BPF 1004.5 0 Symbc (ASTM: D2488) SAND, SLIGHTLY SILTY, fine to SP-SM medium -grained, with a trace of fine Gravel, reddish brown, frozen to 2' to moist, medium dense. 13 o o (Coarse Alluvium) 999.5 5 �E SILTY` AYEY-S , -ne o me ium - } SM-SC grained, with a trace of fine to 12 medium Gravel, brown mottled } with reddish brown, moist, rather stiff to very stiff. 20 .0 (Glacial Till) a� 0 22 ' ° 991.5 13_ - --- -- ------ --- - -- SANDY CLAY, with a trace of fine :19 oCL to medium Gravel, grayish brown m to gray, moist to wet, stiff to very stiff. 15 (Glacial Till) e a a 1 2 0` c 21 0 N r C a } O 4) 979.0 25.5 23 — -- v Water level not encountered with N �- 25'-of hollow -stem auger in grounl. IWater level down 19' 15 minutes after completion of boring. CITY OF 7 CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVEoP.O BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 PLANNING REPORT DATE: March 31, 1978 TO: City Manager, Don Ashworth FROM: Bruce Pankonin, City Planner SUBJ: Preliminary Development Plan Review for Carvers Pointe - Chanhassen Lakes North APPLICANT: Dunn and Curry Real Estate Management, Inc. PLANNING CASE: P-486 �f ORDINANCE REF: Chanhassen City Ordinance 47, Section 14.05 Petition As shown in the attached enclosures, the applicant, Dunn and Curry Real Estate Management, Inc., is proposing to rezone the subject property to P-1, Planned Residen4i.al Development and subdivide the property into 100 single family residential building sites. Background 1. Community Location: As shown in the attached, the subject property contains 46.5+ gross acres and is located in the southeast quadrant of Carver County Road 17 and Carver Beach Road. 2. Existing zoning: The subject property and parcels located to the south are presently zoned R-lA, Agricultural Residence District. The property located to the west, north and east is presently zoned R-1, Single Family Residence District. 3. Comprehensive Plan Proposal (Ref. Carver Beach Neighborhood Plan): a). Land Use: Pursuant to the Carver Beach Plan, the future identity of the land located south of Carver Beach Road should be low density residential, platted as a planned unit development. The scale and character of any development in this area should be compatible with that of the adjoining districts. Mr. Don Ashworth -2- March 31, 1978 b). Traffic circulation: The Carver Beach Plan indicates the area should be served with a "south" access road (proposed MSAS 101) connecting County Road 17 with the Carver Beach Neighborhood and terminating on West 78th Street to the south. c). Park and Open Spacer The Carver Beach Neighborhood Plan indicates that it my be desirable to acquire an active play area located in the northeast portion of the subject property. Said play area is intended to augment the existing playground located on Carver Beach Road. d). Linear Open Space System: The Carver Beach Neighborhood indicates an extensive trailway system unifying the Carver Beach Neighbor- hood and providing easy pedestrian access to the remainder of the city is desirable. Said linear open space system is to be considered not only as a mode of transportation, but also, providing areas for "socializing". 4. Utilities: As shown in the City Engineer's report, adequate sanitary sewer and trunk _service is available to the subject property. Lateral services will be provided by the applicant during development of Carver's Pointe Subdivision. 5. Physiographic Analysis: Two basic landscape characteristics are noted in the subject property. The first is upland loams and clay loam soils and the second are poorly drained depressional soils. Summary of Staff Comments 1. City Engineer's Comments: As shown in the attached, the City Engineer duly reviewed Carver's Pointe preliminary development plan and recommended approval if the developer reduces the street right of way width to 50 feet. 2. Building Inspector's Comments: The Building Inspector feels the plan does not adjust itself to the objectives of a planned residential development. Further, the Building Inspector feels the lots abutting County Road 17 and MSAS 101 should have additional depth so as to provide screened plantings; the lowland areas, Lots 1-13, Block 1, should be used as a neighborhood park. The Building Inspector also notes a,"contradiction between the PUD procedures and the Subdivision Ordinance; and the Building Inspector feels the Penamint/Carver Beach Road Intersection could be dangerous. 3. Fire Marshal's Comments: As shown in the attached, the Fire Marshal, like the Building Inspector, questions the Penamint/Carver Beach Road intersection. In addition, the Fire Marshal feels the street names "Santee Lane" sounds similar to Shawnee and Santa Fe and he feels some confusion could develop. Planner's Comments 1. The criteria for evaluating Dunn and Curry's Planned Residential Development (PRD) is identified in Section 14 of City Ordinance 47. The purpose of the P-1, use district, among other things, is to "provide the means for greater creativity and flexibility... and, provide for the establishment of regulations and procedures .for planned residential Mr. Don Ashworth , -3- March 31, 1978 developments to meet the needs for moderate and low cost housing... without sacrificing quality construction and... tax base." 2. All the objectives of the zoning ordinance are, of course, subjective and require a process of evaluation that is basically qualitative rather than quantitative in character. Certain aspects of the PRD proposal, such as its impact on the natural landscape, public utilities and transportation systems, can be reviewed quantitatively, however, these items are the exception rather than the rule. It is precisely because of the subjective nature of the process that Planning Commission members, planners, city councilmen and citizens are involved. A computer could do the job was simply quantitative. Judgment, based on reason, and on an understanding of the relationship between the proposal and the subjective guidelines set forth in Section 14.01, in the crux of the decision making process. 3. The type of residential structures most suited for the site is easy to determine at this time. Among the factors that must be considered, are contemporary housing market economics, the needs and desires to those seeking housing opportunities in Chanhassen and the physical impact of structures on the natural environment. The impact of quanitative demographic characteristics of the project's residents on the social and economic welfare of the entire community is also an important item to consider. 4. The natural characteristics of the site (0-12% slope, devoid of trees) are natural components for low density single family residential developments. The only limiting natural characteristic of the site is the "potential" for a high seasonal water table in the northeast corner of the property. 5. Density: From the information submitted by the petitioner, I have calculated the net density to be 2.4 dwelling units per net acre after local streets, with a 50 foot right of way, were subtracted from the gross area. This density represents a total population of approximately 320 people. The density as proposed is lower than typical R-1, Single Family Residential development. 6. Demographic Characteristics: The 100 dwelling units will, in all probability, attract families similar to new residents which are being located in Ecklund and Swedlund's Hidden Ponds (directly across the street from Chanhassen's Colonial Grove on STH 101. 7. Double Frontage Along County Road 17: The Building Inspector made an excellent point of the undesirability of residences "backing onto an arterial highway. This undesirable feature can be mitigated if local street right of way was reduced from 60 to 50 feet and the entire plat shifted 30 feet to the east. This will have the affect of adding 30 feet to the rear lots in'. block 4. Within this 30 feet area, the applicant should be required to prepare a landscape plan which will be so designed as to break up the vertical relief from the road to the rear of the house. This landscape plan should consist of earth berms, plant materials and fences. In addition, this landscape component should be extended to the lots abutting future MSAS 101. 8. Neighborhood Park Needs: The Park and Recreation commission is presently studying the needs for providing neighborhood parks for the new residents of Carvers Pointe Subdivision. It is my feeling, as city Mr. Don Ashworth ^� -4- March 31, 1978 planner, neighborhood park needs (ball diamonds, tennis courts, hockey rinks, free skating areas, soccer fields, passive recreational land, picnicking, etc.) would be better handled in a neighborhood park located south of MSAS 101. The Park and Recreation Commission should, however consider the us.e of Carver Beach "tot lot" (northeast of the subject property) and develop a more meaningful activity area. Possible improvements could include a tennis court, picnic shelter and off street parking area. 9.. The applicant should work closely with the building inspector in developing a street naming plan so as not to confuse the casual visitor to Chanhassen. 10. 68th Street presently exists as a "paper" roadway bisecting the subject property. Said roadway will have to be vacated by the Chanhassen City Council prior to acceptance of Carvers Pointe Subdivision. Comments from General Public As shown in the attached, the Chanhassen Planning Commission duly held a public hearing on March 8, 1978, to test neighborhood sentiment on the proposal. Planning Commission Recommendation As shown in the attached, the Planning Commission on March 22, 1978, recommended the city council rezone the subject property from R-lA, Agricultural Residence District to P-1, Planned Residential Development with certain conditions attached. Park and Recreation Commission Recommendation The Park and Recreation Commission at it's meeting on February 8, 1978, duly reviewed Dunn and Curry's proposed Carvers Pointe Subdivision. At this meeting, the Park and Recreation Commission stated that they did not have an interest in a neighborhood playground on the subject property but would like to consider a neighborhood park somewhere to the south Of MSAS 101. Planner's Recommendation I recommend the city council find Dunn and Curry's proposed preliminary development plan for Carver's Pointe to be positively consistent with the City's Plan for land use, transportation, open space, utilities, zoning and subdivision provided: 1. Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District approves the surface water drainage plan. 2. Construction traffic shall be limited to MSAS 101. 3. The subdivision is shifted 30 feet eastward and the developer is required to prepare a landscape plan which will screen the lots abutting CSAH 17 and MSAS 101. With this shift, the average lot sizes per block will be: Block 1 - 22,040; Block 2 - 13,700 square feet; Block 3 - 11,550 square feet; and, Block 4 - 17,500. Mr. Don Ashworth -5- March 31, 1978 4. The developer work with the building inspector to develop a street naming plan which will not be confusing. 5. The developer agrees to submit a final development plan incorporating all the conditions as outlined in city ordinance 47, Section 14.05, Subd. 5. 6. The developer agrees to complete installation of all city streets, curbs, gutters, utilities (sewer and water), underground electric distribution lines by 7. The developer agrees not to request any variances to the setbacks as shown in the attached drawing. 8. City Council resolve the vacation of 68th Street from Nez Perce to CS'AH, as in the best interest of the community. 9. The developer and the City of Chanhassen mutually agree to these conditions in writing.. AcUou Gy,, CRY A3ntinfsNd? EndonJ Modified. ---. - Date - Date Submill—A to Commission Doeirt,•1 w u urcll 4 d i CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVEeP.O BOX 1479CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 MEMORANDUM TO: City Planner, Bruce Pankonin FROM: Community Services Director, Fran Callahan DATE: March 22, 1978 SUBJ: Planning Commission minutes dated March 8, 1978 In reading the minutes of the Planning Commission you state: "The Park and Recreation Commission met on March 7, 1978, but the Planning Commission did not receive their input for the public hearing." I would request that you amend the minutes of your meeting to include my memorandum to you as it reflects the Park and Recreation Commission's input for the public hearing on March 8, 1978. cc: Don Ashworth, City Manager 1 CITY OF 7610 LAREDO DRIVE-*P.O. BOX 147*CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 MEMORANDUM TO: Bruce Pankoni.n, City Planner FROM: Fran Callahan, Community Services Director DATE. February 8, 1978 SUBd: Carvers Pointe - Chanhassen Lakes North The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the above development at its meeting February 7, 1978. They have asked me to respond with their comments. They are as follows: Phyllis Pope stated that Western Hills Park is designated a natural passive area and 'is not *suitable -for active recreation even with additional land acqui'sition. it is to far away -from Carver Pointe to serve the children in t at neighborhood. The Park and Recreation Commission feels that the Carver Pointe children would be better served with a.neighborhood playground in or adjacent to the proposed development. This neighborhood playground should be provided with safe pedestrian access and provide a means to get over or under MSAS 101. Before making any recommendation, the Park and Recreation Commission would like to review the developer's total con- cept and plan for the area and after reviewal, the commission will make a formal reply to the Planning Commission and the Planner. This neighborhood playground should be designed to meet the needs of all the residents. Park and Recreation Commission March 7, 1978 City Hall �r A regular meeting of the Park and Recreation Commission was called to order by Chairman Joe Betz on March 7, 1978, at 7:50 p.m. at City Hall. The following members were present: Joe Betz, Shirley Chellis, Mary Muehlhausen, Walter Coudron, Denis Stedman arrived late. Hud Hollenback from the Planning Commission was also present. A motion was made by Shirley Chellis and seconded by Mary Muehlhausen to approve the minutes of the last meeting. Motion carried. Hud Hollenback from the Planning Commission elaborated on the function and operation of the Planning Commission. He also reviewed Carvers Pointe, Lake Susan Industrial Park and voiced some concern about the regional park at Lake Minnewashta. The Park and Recreation Commission expressed concern that developers were not aware of Ord. 14-A and suggeste that it be placed on the check list of requirements the developers must fulfill. It was also suggested that when a developer comes in with a plan, the Community Services Director should be informed and this information then be passed onto the Park and Recreation Commission. Shirley Chellis requested that the minutes of the Park and Recreation Commission be sent to Hud Hollenback. A motion was made by Shirley Chellis and seconded by Mary Muehlhausen requesting the city council to approve the 25% matching funds for the State Department of Transportation Grant to provide a bike trail from Highway 5 and 101 to Lake Ann. The funds are available in the Park Bond fund. Motion carried. Joe Betz reviewed the legal opinion regarding Hansen and Klingelhutz developers and Western Hills Park. A motion was made by Shirley Chellis and seconded by Walter Coudron that the Park and Recreation Commission has reviewed the John Higgen property and the commission has no interest in acquiring it for park purposes. Motion carried. The Commission reviewed the verbal request of Miles Lord to acquire a parcel of land owned by the City of Chanhassen for beautification purposes. A motion was made by Mary Muehlhausen and seconded by Shirley Chellis to have the city reply to Mr. Lord and thank him for his civic pride. The Commission would also ask the city to explore the possibility of having Mr. Lord reforest the area while the city should retain ownership of the parcel. Motion carried. Chairman Betz reviewed the Picnic in the Park. The Commission reviewed the Lake Ann gate closing in the spring. It was decided to leave the gate open until the park maintenance people recommend closing it. A motion was made by Walter Coudron and seconded by Shirley Chellis to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Francis Callahan, Commun,,-ty Ser—vLces Director Planning Commission Meeting March 22, 1978 -8- 7. Height, yard, area and lot.width and development regulations for the Planned Unit Development.shall be governed by Section 12.05, Ordinance 47. 8. Parking and loading areas shall be governed by Section 9.07, Ordinance 47. 9. The outlots as shown on the preliminary development plan are to be used for public linear trails. 10. The developer agrees to these conditions in writing. Motion seconded by Mal MacAlpine and unanimously approved. CARVER'S POINTE: Phyllis Pope and Pat Boyle, Park and Recreation Commission, Stelios Aslanidis and Jim Hill were present. The Planner recommended that the Planning Commission find Dunn and Curry's proposed preliminary development plan for Carver's Pointe to be positively consistent with the city plan for land use, transportation, open space, utilities, zoning and subdivision provided: 1. Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District approves surface water drainage plan. 2. Construction traffic shall use MSAS 101 only. 3. The subdivision is shifted 30 feet eastward and the developer is required to prepare a landscape plan which will screen the lots abutting CSAH 17 and MSAS 101. 4. The developer work with the Building Inspector to develop a street naming plan which will not be confusing. 5. The developer agrees to submit a final development plan incorporating all the conditions as outlined in Ordinance 47, Section 14.05, subdivision 5. 6. The developer agrees to complete installation of all city streets, curbs, gutters, utilities (sewer and water), underground electric distribution lines by 7. The developer agrees not to request any variances from Ordinance 47, regarding the placement of structures. 8. Planning Commission resolve the vacation of 68th Street from Nez Perce to CSAH 17, if in the best interest of the community. 9. Developer agrees to these conditions in writing. hyllis Pope stated that the Park and Recreation Commission had equested the developer's total plan for the area to see if a park s planned in phase 2 as they feel it is very necessary. The total evelopment plans have not been submitted to the city at this time. im Hill - It just happens that Dunn and Curry owns the adjacent ands. If we did not own the property. If five other people owned that and I think it behooves the Park Commission to determine where in this overall neighborhood they want a park, for what use and what size. In the properties that Dunn and Curry do own adjacent to this we are looking at higher densities so I imagine it to be that if you are going to centrally locate a park with regard to not land but mass of people it would be south of MSAS 101. I think it's more practical to locate the park in the neighborhood and not just necessarily the Dunn and Curry holdings but for the neighborhood and I think it's more appropriate to be south of 101 and not in this low density area. In the future if you wanted 10%, I think the remaining holdings of Dunn and Curry are 100 acres, so we are talking in terms of a free ten acre park. With the single family area we are talking about $21,000 that could go towards either the improvement of the ten and/or the purchase and improvement of 15 acres more centrally located in the mass of people. Ithink that is the kind Planning Commission Meeting March 22, 1978 -9- of thing that I think the commission should be wanting from the Parks Commission so that when they look at parks and the developer looks at the future 100 acres that he just happens to own and you and I and the Parks Commission have an opportunity to plan wisely for parks because there is only one owner that if that kind of planning can be done now we can incorporate those kinds of plans in our future phasing. Hud Hollenback - We..shoould start considering over or under passes. If we have 100 families here we are looking at roads that are going to be highways, how are the children going to get back and forth. I don't'see any way you could,tunnel under the.road. How would you get these people back and forth? Jim Hill - I think that 's-reasgnable,and not unfair. We are going to have low density opposite:ihe�"side where the eventual park will be so that's a plus as..far as pedestrians getting across. I look to it as a grade crossing at a light. Eventually you are going to have a sidewalk along MSAS 101 traversing the entire city and you may even have a trail and that kind of pedestrians would be collected on that and moved over to the designated crossing area and get across there in conjunction with signaling of traffic. Roman Roos - Is there some way that we can get a tentative date from you Jim in terms of the time phasing. Jim Hill - Yes but not tonight.. I think we have.got to coordinate our work with approvals and then with the city engineer and depending on what the schedule of utilities are then we can give one. I think we could do that by the time of a development contract. Roman Roos - Item #7 says the developer agrees not to request any variances from the city ordinance 47. Jim Hill - I would say that is correct if you are looking at the pages of the PUD that were submitted and on that particular page are the setbacks requested and that's 30 front yard, 5 side yard, and 10 side yard. Bruce Pankonin - The garage being 5 feet from the property line. Jim Hill - If you are saying,no variances from those, then that's rue. raig Mertz - If you make a motion on this you should clarify one ay or the other what evactly setbacks you are talking about. ud Hollenback moved to recommend the Council approve the preliminary evelopment plan for subdivision and rezoning subject to the following: 1. Riley Purgatory Creek'lkatershed District approves surface water drainage plan. 2. Construction tr.affic.shall use MSAS 101 only. 3. The subdivision is shifted 30 feet eastward and the developer is required to prepare a landscape plan which will screen the lots abutting CSAH 17 and MSAS 101. 4. The developers work with the Building Inspector to develop a street naming plan which will not be confusing. 5. The developer agrees to submit a final development plan incorporating all the conditions as outlined in'.Ordinance 47, Section 14.05, subdivision 5. 6. The developer agrees to complete installation of all city streets, curbs, gutters, utilities_ (.sewer and water),' -underground electric distribution lines by 7. 'The developer agrees not to request any variances from the plans as submitted on sheet 2 of 4 dated January'6, 1978, regarding the placement'of structures. 8. Planning Commission resolve the"vacation of 68th Street from Nez Perce to CSAH 17. 9. Developer agrees to these conditions in writing. Manning Commission Meeting March 22, 1978 -1 0 Motion seconded by Walter Thompson and unanimously approved. sy )Les Bridger moved to recommend the Council proceed with the vacation °. Cap:'proved. West 68th Street. Motion seconded by Hud Hollenback and unanimously PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION: Pat Boyle and Phyllis Pope were present. to discuss the Park and -Recreation Commission's relationship to the Planning Commission. Hud Hollenback - The other night I attended a Park and Rec. meeting and I understand their frustrations and it's not staffs fault, our fault or their fault, I just don't think they are getting the information that they should in order to act. I don't think we are communicating to well together and we have several suggestions on how we might over come that. What I did was I briefly went over that map showing the areas, the yellow, brown and white. That's the first they had seen that. Did the Council ever approve that? Bruce Pankonin - No. That was just a sketch plan that".I am graphically show all the thoughts to date. Hud Hollenback - I pointed out that the brown area is the sewered area, and is going to .be the area that's going to have intense development going on in the next few years. That's the area that possibly Park and Rec. ought to be looking at immediately.and sort of reserve the rest for later on. That land is going to be going fairly quickly. So if we are going to want neighborhood parks now is the time to start placing. They are looking in these areas but the problem I think is what we were getting at in this one discussion, Park and Rec.,for some reason,I don't think is getting the information on when land is being pressured. In other words when somebody comes to the city saying we are thinking about building something here. It's not until after the fact that they get involved. I think what we have to do is maybe sit down sometime at a joint meeting and just go over it but show them the land is still available, you can indicate what's being pressured, what isn't being pressured and they can at that time start selecting a site within those circles they drew. It was mentioned and I agree, they don't just want to take ten acres here or ten acres there depending on the kind of park they want something where the topography is right, either it's flat or it's marshy or it's rolling or whatever. Bruce Pankonin - I think those are valid points. Parks,by there very nature,are positive shaping elements for the neighborhood. Park and Rec. should know from the Planning Commission what the Planning Commission envisions a neighborhood to look like, densities primarily, road locations, commercial, whatever. The Park and Rec. Commission should also tell the Planning Commission what level of service do they want to provide, generally, for the city. What parameters 4 for development do they want to develop. Given the Manning Commission's feeling on location and density of the neighborhood and traffic circulation, given CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVEAP.O. BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 MEMORANDUM DATE: March 21, 1978 TO: Planning Commission; Staff; James R. Hill, 8200 Humboldt Ave. South, Minneapolis, MN; Rod Hardy, Dunn and Curry Real Estate Inc., 4940 Viking Drive, Minneapolis, MN FROM: Bruce Pankonin, City Planner SUBJ: Preliminary Development Plan for Carvers Pointe, Chanhassen Lakes North Planned Residential Development (PRD) APPLICANT: Dunn and Curry and Real Estate Management, Inc. PLANNING CASE: P-486 Please include the following enclosures with your copy of Exhibit 1, Carvers Pointe, Chanhassen Lakes North Planned Residential Development: TTnr•1 ncnrc 15. City Planner's Report dated March 21, 1978. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O. BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 PLANNING REPORT DATE: March 21, 1978 TO: Planning Commission, Staff, Rod Hardy and Jim Hill FROM: Bruce Pankonin, City Planner SUBJ: Preliminary Development Plan for Carver's Pointe - Chanhassen Lakes North Planned Residential Development (PRD) APPLICANT: Dunn and Curry Real Estate Management.,. Inc. PLANNING CASE: P-486 REF: City Ordinance 47, Section 14.05, Subd. 4 Pursuant to city ordinance 47, the Planning Commission, after the conclusion of a public hearing for preliminary development plan, shall make recommendation to the city council which may include the following: 1. Approval of disapproval of the rezoning application. 2. Approval of preliminary development plan. 3. Disapprove of the preliminary development plan stating reasons for disapproval, or 4. Approval of preliminary development plan subject to specified modifications and conditions. Planner's Recommendation I recommend the Planning Commission find Dunn and Curry's proposed preliminary development plan for Carver's Pointe to be positively consistent with the City Plan for land use, transportation, open space, utilities, zoning and subdivision provided: 1. Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District approves surface water drainage plan. 2. Construction traffic shall only use MSAS 101. 3. The subdivision is shifted 30 feet eastward and the developer is required to prepare a landscape plan which will screen the lots abutting to CSAH 17 and MSAS 101. %Planning Commission -2- March 21, 1978 4. The developers work with the Building Inspector to develop a street naming plan which will not be confusing. 5. The developers agree to submit a final development plan incorporating all the conditions as outlined in city ordinance 47, section 14.05, subdivision 5. 6. The developers agree to complete installation of all city streets, curbs, gutters, utilities (sewer and water),underground electric distribution lines by 7. The developers agree not to request any variances from shy + 7, re�gardjncL the placement of structures. /ti d s 40 r r +� vw. f 1 %q . 8. Planning Commission resolve the vacation of 68th Street from Nez Perce to CSAH 17, if in the best interest of the community. 9. Developer agrees to these conditions in writing. Ra•. if ASS FN .�,. ,ivan•.1_•r . i i UHLIC HEARING ON PRO J h, IG AND SUBDIVISION OF LAN. AND CURRY REAL Er' '_EMENT INCORPORAT EN; MINNESOTA HEREBY GIVEN, that the Planning f the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, will esday, the dth day of March, 1978 at 7:45 ty Hall, 7610 Laredo Drive, Chanhassen, the purrom of holding a public hearing to ing the following described property from tural Residential District to P-1 Planned strict, and to subdivide the property into lots. The proposed rezoning and sub - involves the following described parcel ION: nd 1302, CARVER BEACH, accortiing to lit thereof. f the Southeast Quarter of Seceton 2, 114, North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal scribed as follows: rr�• at the northwest corner of Lot 1301, :EACH, according to the recorded plat sce southerly along the west line of said Lot wuthwest corner thereof; thence easterly nth lines of Lots 1301, 1302, 1303, 1304, and sai plat to a point thereon distant 1.44 feet ..Illy . .he southeast corner of said Lot 1352; thence s, "• the northwest corner of lot 1839 in said plat; It erly along the west line of said Lot 1839 to u i corner thereof; thence westerly along the Grove Road (now known as West 68th dicated in said plat of Carver Beach, to the zeelsior Road (now known as CSAH No. 17) in said plat of Carver Beach; thence ng said east line to the south line of :uniper norm as Carver Beach Road) as dedicated m suy j, i Carver Beach; thence easterly along the raid Juniper Road to the point of beginning. of the Southeast Quarter of Section 2, North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal cribed as follows: t the northwest corner of Lot 2222, Lii T :e ding to the recorded plat thereof; :.:nee a ng the west title of said Lot 2222 :t, the rner thereof; thence easterly along the Lots 2222 and 2223 in said plat to the nor- m - of Lots 2259 in said plat; thence soui erly +t line of said Lot 2254 and its sou^.erly he center line of Forest Road as dedicated Carver Beach; thence easterly along said the westerly line of Highland Drive (now Perce) as dedicated in said plat; thence ngg said westerly line and the same ez- rly to the center line of Dogwood Road as lat of Carver Beach; thence North 88 tes 20 seconds West (assumed bearing) line of said Dogwood Road a distance ence northwesterly, 507.92 feet, along a ave to the southwest having a radius of a chord hearing of North 61 degrees 17 onda West; thence North 87 degrees 48 rids West, tangent to last described ce of 1097.89 feet to the east line of 7 x- ow known as CSAH 17) as dedicated in ce northerly along said, east line U. the rove Road (now known as West i tl. at in said plat; thence easterly along of said Grove Road to the point of said proposed rezoning and sub - for inspection at the City Hall. All may appear and be heard at skid BY ORDER OF THE t`idayit of Publication Sate of Minnesota ) ) ss. County of Carver ) William McGarry , being duly sworn, on oath says he is and during all the time herein stated has been the publisher and printer of the newspaper known as Carver County Herald and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (1) Said newspaper is printed in the English language in newspaper format and in column and sheet form equivalent in printed space to at least 900 square inches. (2) Said newspaper is a weekly and is distributed at least once a week. (3) Said news paper has 50% of its news columns devoted to news of local interest to the community which it purports to serve and does not wholly duplicate any other publication and is not made up entirely of patents, plate matter and advertisements. (4) Said newspaper is circulated in and near the municipality which it purports to serve, has at least 500 copies regularly delivered to paying subscribers, has an average of at least 75% of its total circulation currently paid or no more than three months in arrears and has entry as second-class matter in its local post -office. (5) Said newspaper purports to serve the City of Chaska in the County of Carver and it has its known office of issue in the City of Chaska in said county, established and open during its regular business hours for the gathering of news, sale of advertisements and sale of subscriptions and maintained by the managing officer of said newspaper, persons in its employ and subject to his direction and control during all such regular business hours and at which said newspaper is printed. (6) Said newspaper files a copy of each issue immediately with the State Historical Society. (7) Said newspaper has complied with all the foregoing conditions for at least one year preceding the day or dates of publication mentioned below. (8) Said newspaper has filed with the Secretary of State of Minnesota prior to January 1, 1966 and each January 1 thereafter an affidavit in the form prescribed by the Secretary of State and signed by the managing officer of said newspaper and sworn to before a notary public stating that the newspaper is a legal newspaper. He further states on oath that the printed Public Hearing hereto attached as a part hereof was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published therein in the English language, once each week, for o n e successive weeks; that it was first so published on Wed. the 2 2 n d dd day of Feb. 19-7-0and was thereafter printed and published on every to and including the day of 19 and that the following is a printers ropy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of said notice, to wit: abcdefghi jkimnnnnrstuvwxvz Subscribed and sworn to before me this Iil,- day of (Notarial Seal) �14LORRAIIC LANO i1 � NOTARY PUBLIC — MIryNESOTA `jt�Ft CARVER COUNT," ' My Commission Expires June 29. 1982 o,iNiVlNsw Notary public, eo- �'— County, Minn My Commission Expires 19 a+ n LARtSON & MERTZ ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING RUSSELL H.LAR50N MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 CRAIG M. MERTZ OF COUNSEL HARVEY E. SKAAR MARK C. MCCULLOUGH November 8, 1978 Mr. John Emmond Schoell and Madson City Engineers 50 Ninth Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 Re: Plat of Chaparral Dear Mr. Emmond: TELEPHONE (612) 335-9565 Carver Beach Sewer Project Easements Nos. 42 and 43 (as revised February 13, 1976), and Greenwood Shores Sewer Project Easement Nos. 1,2 and 3 are located in the area of the proposed Chaparral plat. In 1976, the land underlying these five easements was owned by Hansen and Klinglehutz Construction Inc. and by Ecklund & Swedlund Development Company. This office never obtained the necessary signatures for these five easements because the owners were in the process of a land exchange. In reviewing the proposed plat of Chaparral dated October 30, 1978, I note that the developer has dedicated all of the necessary ease- ments with the exception of that portion of Carver Beach easement No. 42 which lies within the plat. -Please call this to the attention of New Horizon Homes' surveyor as soon as possible. In addition, I note that the :portions of all five of these ease- ments lie outside of the plat of Chaparral and that minor changes in sewer alignment have been made. Please revise the legal descrip- tions for these five easements incorporating the alignment changes and the new boundary line between Chaparral and the H&K property. After we have received the revised easement descriptions, we will be re-examining the title to confirm that H&K is the new owner of the land beneath the revised easements and we will be contacting the owners regarding a donation of the easements. Very truly yours, CRAIG M. MERTZ Assistant Chanhassen Attorney CMM:jep cc: Donald . Ashworth 7610 LAREDO DRIVEoP.O. BOX 147•CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 November 6, 1978 Suburban Engineering Attn: Bruce Patterson 6875 Highway No. 65 NE Minneapolis, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Patterson: I am in receipt of your letter of October 30, 1978, regarding storm sewer plans for New Horizon Homes in the Carver Beach area. In regards to a city benefit or benefit to property owners of the 5.5 acres north of Carver Beach Road, this office has the following concerns: 1). The City of Chanhassen has completed it's budgetary process for 1979 and certified such to the County. This budget does not include general obligation levies for storm sewer improvements -.thus negating the possibility of shifting priorities. 2). To date, all storm sewer improvements have been carried out through special assessment procedures against benefitting properties. It is possible that the City, -Council would consider initiating a public improvement project to complete the work noted in your letter (the other alternative of receiving a petition from property owners in the 5.5 acres requesting the improvements does not appear logical).. However, you should note that any project initiated by the city council which would consider specially assessing benefitted property would require that the city follow all requirements of State law, i.e. ordering of feasibility study, ordering public hearing, finding of public necessity, authorizing plans and specifications, authorizing bids, completion of work by low bidder, notification of special assessment hearing, municipal bonding, and certification of assessments to County Auditor. Although this process has been the only Mr. Bruce Patterson -2- November-6, 1978 reasonable option open to the City o._ previous storm sewer improvement projects, I sincerely question whether the time required for this type of process would present a valid option for you. In summation, I do not believe this issue can be simplified in this type of letter. Given the concerns of your office and New Horizon Homes, as well as those of the City, I would suggest a meeting between yourself, our engineers and myself. Sincerely, r Don Ashworth City Manager DA:k cc: City Attorney, Ru-sell Larson City Engineer, Schoell and Madson; Attn: Bill Brezinsky 01 UBURBAN 1-1 NBINEERINQ q1 NC. Main Office 571.6066 6875 Highway No. 65 N. E. -- Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 South Office 890-6510 Li Civil, Municipal & Environmental Engineering 1101 Cliff Road Land Surveying • Land Planning • Soil Testing Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 uu City of Chanhassen 710 Laredo Chanhassen, Minn. 55317 Attn: Donald W. Ashworth, CityhMgr. Re: Chaparral, Phase I Dear Mr. Ashworth: October 30, 1978 In reviewing our storm sewer plans with New Horizon Homes, we came to realize that a small portion of the work consists of providing for runoff from off -site properties. Serveral drawings are attached which indicate this situation.' The larger drawing is a sketch showing the drainage areas whose runoff drains into Pdnd W. This runoff, as you can see, is divided into two separate areas by Carver Beach Road - the southerly area contributing direct runoff into the pond. At the present time, a culvert collects runoff from the 5.5 acre area north of Carver Beach Road and carries it just under the roadway. In order to prevent further erosion at this site, we are extending this culvert down the hill, placing a catch basin at the southerly gutter line, and insulating the existing 18" watermain. Inasmuch as this work is being done for the benefit of the drainage area lying north of Carver Beach Road, New Horizon Homes feels that the City should participate in the cost for this improvement. No bids have been taken, but out estimate for this work is as follows: a) 90 LF of 15" RCP @ $ 16/LF = 1,440 b) Catch Basin, lea. @ $600/Ea = 600 c) Energy Dissipator, 1 ea. @ $300 = 300 d) Rip -Rap 1$" @ $100 ffi 100� 200 e) Insulate DIP watermain @ $200 = 1`�� 7 V�� Estimated Total $2,640 ti h ()CT 1978 RECEIVED N VILLAGE OF, �7 iCL"1ANMg8S�N� �// Robert Minder, Reg. Eng. E. A. Rathbun, Reg. Surv. Wm. E. Price, Reg. Eng. Gary R. Harris, Reg. Surv. Peter J. Molinaro, Reg. Eng. Wm. E. Jensen, Reg. Eng. Wm. K. Meyer, Reg, Eng. H. William Rogers, Reg. Surv. Bruce A. Paterson, Reg. Eng. Alan E. Rathbun, Reg. Eng. !—) To: City of Chanhassen Re: Chaparral, Phase I October 30, 1978 Page 2 of 2 We would appreciate your consideration of this request. Please contact me or Mr. Bob Burger of New Horizon if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely SUBURBAN ENGINEERING, INC. C' Bruce A. Paterson, P.E. cc: Bob Burger Bill Bryzinski BAP / db I ! I I I ► ► � 1 ( ► I 1 ` EXISTING 8" PVC T I I EXISTING le" DIP w \� I 12 C B R +304 0- I 1 ! 30813 z ► 1 ci T.I E ALL JOINTS Z I 2 r I ! I ENERGY DISSIPATOR Z 1 gI RIP -RAP _ S RAW BA I E W > Q > �O 1020 ! r CONNECT EXIST.15"C.M.P. TO NEW C. B. EXIST.18"QL�� . ! INSULATE WkTJ RMAIN i I 90" 11 ":R:C:P, MIX.,I ! yl ENERGY DISSIPATOR i 1000 100Q oo , RIP RAP' MINNEHAHA CREEK LAKE WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 BOARD OF MANAGERS: David H. Cochran, Pres. • H. Dale Palmatier • Albert L. Lehman • lames S. Russell • Jean Williams September 27, 1978 New Horizon Homes, Inc. 3131 North Fernbrook Lane Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 Re: Permit Application No. 78-113 Location: County Road 17 and Carver Beach Road, Chanhassen Purpose: Grading and Drainage Plan for "Chaparral" Development Gentlemen: At its meeting on September 21, 1978 the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District reviewed the subject permit appli- cation. It approved the permit as requested for diversion of drainage from Christmas Lake to Riley -Purgatory Creek with the condition that the proposed drainage meets all the requirements of and is acceptable to the Riley -Purgatory Creek Watershed District. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the Districts E. A Hickok, P.E. EAH/jel cc: D. Cochran G. Macomber A. Gebhardt t.: Pankonin B. Paterson 346 (� b'- \1 OCT 1978CAn CD Receiver L� v1LLgaE oR �� CHANr-agSS�N� �� MINN. a ��c" minnesota department of health 717 s.e. delaware st. (612) 296-5221 minneapolis 55440 September 28, 1978 City Council c/o Dale Geving, Clerk City Hall Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Council Members: We are enclosing a copy of our report covering an examination of plans and specifications on watermain for Chanhassen, Minnesota. A copy of the identified plans and specifications is also enclosed. If you have any questions in regard to the information contained in this report, please contact Mr. Stephen Greenwood at 612/296-5270. Yours very truly, Gary L. Englund, P.E., Chief Section of Water Supply and General Engineering cc: Suburban Engineering 3 So r VIL.LA �.a Cy,4Ny OF .Y.. M1VN i� an equal opportunity employer �L'3 O INNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Division of Environmental health Information Relative to Plan Examination The examination of plans and specifications for water supply and sewerage systems (Regulation MHD 13 6(a)), plumbing systems (Regulation MHD 139(a)(1)), and swimming pools (Regulation MHD 141(c)), is made to provide information concerning the sanitary features of projects presented for consideration in accordance with the above regulations of the Commissioner of Health. The approval of such plans is given upon the supposition that the.survey and other -data on which the design is based are correct, and that necessary legal authority has been obtained to construct the project. The responsibility for the design of structural features and the efficiency of equipment must be taken by the engineer or architect who designs the project. Water supply plans are examined with regard to the location, construction and operational features of the design and maintenance of all parts of the system which may affect the safety and sanitary quality of the water. Examination is based on the standards of this Department. Plans of sewage disposal systems considered by this Department are limited to those systems that can utilize soil absorption. They are examined with regard to the features of design which concern location, construction, operation and maintenance of the system and which may affect the public health. The examination is based upon information contained in the bulletins entitled "Tentative Standards for Design of Small Sewage Works," July 1962, and the recommended "Ordinance and Code Regulating Individual Sewage Disposal System," 1971. Plans on plumbing systems are examined only insofar as the provisions of. the Minnesota Plumbing Code apply. Swimming pool plans are examined with regard to the features of location and design which may affect the safety and sanitary quality of the water for public bathing. The examination is based upon Regulation MIM 141, Public Swimming Pools. The Commissioner of Health reserves the right to withdraw his approval of plans if construction of the project is not undertaken within a period of two years. The fact that plans have been approved by the Commissioner of Health does not necessarily mean that recommendations for alterations or additions may not be offered at some later time when changed conditions or advanced knowledge make improvements necessary. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE*P.O. BOX 147®CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager, Don Ashworth FROM: Assistant City Planner, Bob Wabiel SUBJ: Wetland Fill Permit Application, Preliminary Grading Plan, and Soil Boring Test Reports, for New Horizon Homes Chaparral Development (Carver's Point). DATE: August 11, 1978 PLANNING CASE: P-48t-� Attached is the original copy received by the city of the subject items. You will note that the notification of permit application has been addressed.to the chief executive officer of Chanhassen. I art not familiar with the normal proceedings with such an application, however, a copy of this information has been sent to the City Engineer for his review along with my comments regarding the proposed activities. Your comments regarding this application would be appreciated at your earliest possible convenience, since our consideration should be submitted by August 17th or at which time an extension of the period for comments would have to be established. �, V USURBAN F] NGINEERING I INC. Civil, Municipal & Environmental Engineering Land Surveying • Land Planning • Soil Testing Department of Natural Resources Division of Waters, Soils & Minerals Regulations Unit - Permit Section Centennial Building St. Paul, MN 55155 Re: Submission of Revision to Application Gentlemen: Main Office 571.6066 6875 Highway No. 65 N. E. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 South Office 890-6510 1101 Cliff Road Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 Aug. 25,1978 Ref: 78-57 Enclosed is a revised Application to Perform Work in Public Waters for the proposed Chaparrel 1st Addition in Chanhassen, Carver County. The original application indicated the placement of a substantial amount of fill along the north edge of a pond in the northwesterly portion of the development south of Carver Beach Road. After further review of the situation,it was determined that a re- arrangement of the lots would result in reducing the amount of fill along the pond boundary at the expense of losing only one lot. It was therefore, deemed to be a reasonable trade-off and this revised grading plan/ application is submitted for ,your consideration. Inasmuch as this revised grading operation involves the pond minimally, if at all, we would request that you reconsider whether this work requires a DNR permit. In any case, the plan has been submitted to the Watershed District and to the local SCS agent. The Watershed District will be meet- ing on 6 September. Thank you for your cooperation and courtesty. Sincerely, SUBURBAN ENNGGINEERING,INC. Bruce A. Paterson, P.E. cc: Barr Engineering -Riley Purgatory Watershed Dist. Paul Newman, SCS,Carver County New Horizon Homes, Inc. BAP/lh enc AUG 1978, RECEIVED VILLAGE ©F, CHANHASSEN, MINN. Ruber't .hinder, Rr•g. Eng. E. A. Rathbun. Reg. Suru. Wm. E. Price, Reg, E'ng. Gary R. Harris. Reg. Surv. Purr J. .1101iurrru. 16"g L'n,;. li'm E. Jensen, Reg. Eng. Wrn. K. Aleyer, Reg. Eng. l/, William Ru;!.^ Reg. Suro. Brun A. Paterson. Reg. I'at;. A/m, E MaItbun. P'ng. j l Lake Lucy . . : • • `4 • / I _= PK �! OF Lake FUTURE VELQPMENT I OF • f• 2C U •F • • F AR 0'r OF K OF ' ® OF • • • I . rC..•��.•..,.��11�� .ul N�N�1lC :11 , •M41XMY11.1 �� !r m �Q�CaD7 ��S�O40 6J6J6J • war Irl � o, �3c- HPI uu ffl 08-81rl i .Islam !1•—•' 1_V'�� i Qr — — I OF • 8 r • Eft • OF /I{ Lake Susan Rice - �, • • Marsh �� is = • Lake 1 • OF N - - — OF •f •F OF OF OF _ 34 34-3 • • O fj • O 34a34 34 l ' K PL • LYMAN 0 80ULFVARD � • • • �� ;I FT • s NEW HORIZON HOMES, INC. BUILDING TOMORROWS DREAMS TODAY 3131 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH P.O. BOX 1367 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55440 612-559-5770 June 6, 1980 City of Chanhassen 7610 Laredo Drive P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attention: Mr. Bob Waibel Subject: Chaparral 1 Chanhassen, Minnesota Dear Bob: Enclosed is a landscaping plan showing plantings for the single family lots at the intersection of C. S. A. H. 17 and M. S. A. S. 101. Although the plan details earth berms, it should be noted that only the earth berms as shown on the approved grading plan will be constructed for landscaping purposes. The reason for this is that the beams shown on the grading plan take into consideration surface drainage. If you should have any questions, please advise. 14 J�}�1980 GJF/pm _ C IVED Enc . ��'�P►NHAB' Very truly you s, In. Gregory J. Frank, P. E. Vice President of Land Development AIR 7610 LAREDO DRIVE®P.O. BOX 147•CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 September 25, 1979 U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development 6400 France Avenue South Minneapolis, MN and Veterans Administration Fort Snelling St. Paul, 14N Re: Chaparral lst Addition To Whom It May Concern: This is to certify that: A letter of credit has been furnished and is acceptable to the City of Chanhassen in the amount of $519,370.00 for the purpose of assuring that New Horizon Homes, Inc. will install the following improvements for the Chaparral lst Addition, as approved by the City Council: 1. Storm Sewer 2. Sanitary Sewer 3. Residential and State Aid Streets 4. Watermain By Don Ashworth, City Manager This is to advise that the City of Chanhassen is legally empowered to assume the obligation mentioned above (Minnesota Statutes, Section 465.03). Russell H. Larson, City Attorney i CITY O F oar" 7610 LAREDO DRIVEsP.O. BOX 147*CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 July 25, 1979 Mr. Robert L. Burger, President New Horizon Homes 3131 Fernbrook Lane North Suite 104 Plymouth, MN 55441 Dear Bob: This letter is to clarify and correct some of the points in my letter to you of July 18, 1979, concerning the lighting in and around the Chaparral model area. It has been brought to my attention that the City Council minutes of June 4, 1979, specifically state that the Chaparral sign shall not be illuminated. Additionally, no information has been found regarding the lighting around the model parking area. Until the council can consider an overall lighting proposal, the use of the sign and parking area lights must be discontinued. Again, in recognition of potential vandalism occurring to the un- occupied models, you may leave lighting on these models (only lighting directed towards the models) until such time as the City Council reviews overall lighting items. Sincerely, Bob Wa.ibel Assistant Manager/Planner BW:k ,r Minnesota Pollution The Honorable Walter Hobbs Mayor, City of Chanhassen 7610 Laredo Drive Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Mayor Hobbs: From: C :;. Administrator Refer! c� 10* h1ayor� Couns;l Ply: mcr, c� y 79 t,la,L .Co 0t�' u late59;� Enclosed is a copy of Permit Number 10933 for construction and operation of a sanitary sewer extension.in Chanhassen. Please review the permit carefully, and let have any questions concerning it. You may above address or call (612) 296-7246. Yours truly, Perm. Beaton, P.E. Chief, Facilities Section Division of Water Quality PTB/MyMH:ke Enclosures cc: Chanhassen City Council, c/o Clerk Suburban Engineering, Inc. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Metropolitan Council us know if you contact me at the Phone:(612) 296-7246 1935 West County Road 62, Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Regional Offices - Duluth/Brainerd/Detroit Lakes/Marshall/Rochester Equal Opportunity Employer FEBY979 Remo'ejyEo 09 N 14k & J W42 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency VCP PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF DISPOSAL SYSTEM Chanhassen Carver County Pursuant to Authorization by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, 1976, Chapters 115 and 116, plans are approved and a permit is hereby granted to the City of Chanhassen for construction and operation of a sanitary sewer extension in Chanhassen. The facilities consist of 4950 linear feet of 8-inch sanitary sewer extension. The facilities are further described in plans and specifications, designated "Chaparrel - New Horizon Homes, Inc." received September 19, 1978, prepared by Suburban Engineering, Inc. for the City of Chanhassen. SPECIAL CONDITION The permittee shall comply with all rules, regulations and requirements of the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board prior to construction of the proposed project. Yours truly L,,- 2Perrvyl Beaton, P.E. Chief, Facilities Section Division of Water Quality PERMIT NUMBER: 10933 DATED: FEB I zi in rq Phone: 1935 West County Road 132, Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Regional Offices • Duluth/Brainerd/Detroit Lakes/Marshall/Rochester Equal Opportunity Employer MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Division of Water Quality INFORMATION RELATIVE TO REVIEW OF PLANS AND PERMIT APPLICATIONS October 1972 The review of plans and specifications for sewage, industrial waste or other waste disposal systems and applications for permits for the same is made in accordance with the authority conferred by law (see MS 1971, Section 115.07). Approval of plans and permits is based upon the assumption that the information provided by the applicant is cor- rect and that all necessary legal requirements have been or will be satisfied. Plans for sewage, industrial waste or other waste disposal systems are examined with regard to the design features which apply to operation and maintenance of the treatment works or sewer system, the degree of treatment to be provided, the effectiveness and reliability of the system or methods employed, and compliance with applicable standards of quality and purity for waters of the state or effluents of disposal systems. The bulletins entitled Recommended Standards for Sewage Works, 1971, revised edition, Tentative Standards for Design of Small Sewage Works, July 1962 and Federal Guidelines for Design, Operation and Maintenance of Waste Water Treatment Facilities, September 9 and supplements thereto, as well as other memoranda, are used as a guide in examination of the design, operation and maintenance aspects of the proposed system. Sewer plans are recommended for approval on the basis that the system is to collect only domestic sewage and such industrial or other waste as may have been provided for in the. design. Foundation or footing drains to collect ground water and roof drains or other surface water conduits should not be connected to the sanitary sewer system. Ade- quate field supervision and inspection by a qualified representative of the owner should be provided at all times during construction to assure that the project is constructed in compliance with the approved plans and specifications. The Agency assumes no responsibility for the integrity of structures or physical features, or for the reliability, durability or efficiency of specific items of propriety equipment or material. All applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations or ordinances must be followed in the design, location and construction of proposed sewer systems or treatment works. The Agency reserves the right to withdraw its approval of plans if construction is not undertaken within a reasonable period after issuance of the permit. MPCA 595 mETROPOLITAn WAITE COnTROL Commlfflon Twin Cities Area Z�_ February 6, 1979 Mr. Donald Ashworth City Manager City of Chanhassen 7610 Laredo Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Chapparral - New Horizon Home Dear Mr. Ashworth: Vrom: City Administrator tteterred To: col:ll.ii{ Piiri1"r=� fib! ti: fl:u�:�+ ..�,.....-. "`• L'.1:4S.sJ rrwr. .rsw •e .+' ..M/ FrG._.-.,.....:..:�. Calm! .�_..� �r,� Date :-: :047 ) We have reviewed the information submitted (design data and location map) for this sanitary sewer improvement project and find it in accord with your comprehensive sewer plan and consistent with the Metropolitan Urban Service Area as defined by the Metropolitan Council in their Development Framework Program. We will f.i 1 e this information as part of your comprehens i viz se+,ver -Ian and inform the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency that Yre have no objections Co the installation of these facilities. Very truly yours, 'WC�', eok4l R. A. Odde Staff Encineer RAO: RJP:hw cc: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Metropolitan Council Suburban Engineering, Inc. South Office 350 RIETROIOUARE BLDG. 7TH & ROBERTJTREET/ /AInT PAUL mn 55101 612/222.8423 6 7 RECEIVED VIL.L.AGE Or A7INK recyded 0 1 !(� LARSON & MERTZ ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING RUSSELL H. LARSON d!rr III MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 CRAIG M. MERTZ 4 OF COUNSEL HARVEY E. SKAAR YI MARK C. Mc CULLOUGH January 31, 1979 Mr. Donald W. Ashworth City Manager Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Rezoning of Chaparral and Lotus Lake Estates Dear Don: TELEPHONE (612) 33S-9565 Enclosed you will find our proposed Ordinance Nos. 47=0 and 47-P which have the effect of rezoning Chaparral.and Lotus Lake Estates, respectively. The City Council approved the rezoning of Chaparral on April 3, 1978, and approved ,t.e._s�zc�ng-ot.-Ifotus Take Estates on July 10, 1978.�.� - -� ti If you find these ordinances to be in order, please arrange for , their proper execution and the usual publication in_the Carver,,. County Herald. _... .............: _Yours --very truly, CRAIG M. MERTZ Assistant Chanhassen Attorney CMM: j e p Enclosures BY MESSENGER 4QY---• o� r T�F TWIN CITlfp P� 'O f" y�0 1�01' el December 26, 1978 The Honorable Walter Hobbs Mayor of the City of Chanhassen 7610 Laredo Drive P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Mayor Hobbs: Metropolita, 300 Metro Square Seventh Street and Robert Saint Paul, Minnesota 5., Telephone (612) 291-6453 Office of the Chairman yt/ The Metropolitan Council recently received a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, A-95 review for the New Horizon Homes, Inc., proposed Chaparral subdivision in Chanhassen. As part of the A-95 review, the Council requests the Waste Control Commission to review the proposed development and comment on it to the Council. The attached Commission response dated November 29, 1978, refers to a letter dated November 6, 1978, sent to Mr. Donald W. Ashworth, regarding the proposed Chaparral subdivision. In summary, the Commission response states that the Chaparral subdivision proposal approval is being withheld until an Interim Comprehensive Sewer Plan on the Comprehensive Plan of Chanhassen as described in the Land Planning Act, is approved by the Council and Commission. If Chanhassen wishes to have this development proceed with sewer service and U.S. Department of HUD approval, the City should submit one of the plans described above. The Council and Commission staff are available to answer questions or to provide information as to what the interim plan should contain if your staff has any question. They may call Karl Burandt of our staff at 291-6404 for such a meeting or for information. Sincerely, C��4 Fn land, Chairman cc: New Horizon Homes, Inc. Donald W. Ashworth, Chanhassen City Manager Tom Fenney, Director, HUD Ray Odde, MWCC John Doyle, Metropolitan Council Karl Burandt, Metropolitan Council DEC 1978 VILLAGE OF �'J J CW ANNA88EN, MINN JB/cjd Attach. METROPOUTAn WALTE COnTROL commupon Twin Cities Rrea V4 November 29, 1978 Mr. John Boland, Chairman Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building St. Paul, MN 55101 Re: Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 6458 Dear Mr. Boland: The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission acknowledges the receipt of the feasibility analysis for the Chaparral subdivision in the City of Chanhassen. Attached is a copy of the letter directed to the City on November 6, 1978, indicating the need for their exist- ing comprehensive sewer plan to be updated. Presently, approval for the Chaparral sanitary sewer extension is being withheld until it and the other issues listed in the attached letter are addressed. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this feasibility analysis. Very truly ours, A. C. Gnerre` Deputy Chief Adii'nistrator ACG:RJP:hw Attachment cc: City of Chanhassen 350 METRO /OUARE BLDG. 1TH 6 ROBERT/TREET/ imnT PAUL limn 55101 612/222.6423 U -- r !-1 C , )TROL llfil V/10�1 f i. o November 6, 1978 Mr. Donald W. Ashworth City Manager City of Chanhassen P. 0. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Chapparral - New Horizon Homes Dear Mr. Ashworth: The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission finds that the proposed sewer extension is not in conformance with the City's existing comprehensive sewer plan. We therefore cannot approve this extension without the amending of Chanhassen's CSP. Any amendment would have to receive Commission approval after review and comment by the Metropolitan Council. Any acceptable amendments to the present CSP would have to address other issues besides the proposed sewer extension. Outstanding concerns which must be included are as follows: 1) Proposed Lake Riley Sewer Extension Chanhassen has failed to submit the requested documentation to justify the proposed sewer extension to serve Lake Riley. An engineering report supporting the existence of pollution problems in the Lake has been requested. CSP amendments should address this as well. 2) Arboretum Area Proposed sewer service for the Arboretum Education and Research Building should be included. As of yet, the City has not defined its position on this development. 3) Lake Susan Hills Industrial Park The design basis and proposed timetable for sewer service to the planned Lake Susan Hills Industrial Park should be incorporated in the CSP. The City should be careful in the location of the proposed trunk line, in that the approval will be based upon possible future Metropolitan Interceptor construction. METRO/OURRE BLDC. 7TH G MUUMUU MAT PRUL mn s5:O1 612IM-8 M V f E • Mr. Donald W. Ashworth City Manager City of Chanhassen November 6 1978 Page Two 4) Other Areas The issue of*undeveloped areas within the MUSA boundary is of particular concern. The planned direction of these areas has not been clearly defined An the present CSP. The sewer extension referred.to in this letter is an example. The timetable of development and the location of proposed future laterals serving Neighborhood Service Areas must be established. This -is expeciaily important when considering the capacity limi.tations t of the'Metropolitan Interceptors serving Chanhassen. Should -.you have any.questions about these matters, please call Mr. Ray Odde or Mr. Don Bluhm of the staff. Very truly yours, Bernard J.�Harrington Director Engineering BJH:FJS:hw cc: John Harrington, Metropolitan Council Myrna Halback, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Fi r._ `,� � i ,;1• 4 h � 'fit, a�, �''r� 7610 LAREDO DRIVE®P.O. BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 December 5, 1978 New -Horizon Homes Attn: Robert Burger 3131 Fernbrook Lane North Suite 104 Plymouth, MN 55441 Dear Mr. Burger: On November 20, 1978, the Chanhassen City Council approved the development contract for Chapparel, Phase I. I am attaching a copy of the contract as approved. Please note that the section under variances has been modified to reflect the intent of New Horizon Homes and the City not to consider variances, but has not made such an .absolute. On November 20th, I did inform the City Council of deletion of two lots from the final plat. Additionally, I noted to the City Council that this office would be authorizing the issuance of building permits for the six model homes under the condition that such homes would be served by a parking area served off Carver, Beach and that no occupancy permits would be issued for the six homes until such time as temporary improvements.for the model homes were removed and public improvements completed for the streets fronting these homes. Please review the attached copy of the development contract and, if acceptable, -stop at city hall to sign the original and file copies. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, or the development contract, please feel free to contact me. TZ Sincerely,± i C1�-,..i Don Ashworth City Manager cc: City Attorney, Russell Larson City Planner Building Inspector P 0 `1 RUSSELL H. LARSON CRAIG M. MERTZ OF COUNSrL HARVEY E. SKAAR MARK C. MCCULLOUGH LARSON & MEUTZ ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 November 29, 1978 Ms. Marlys Wilson New Horizon Homes, Inc. 3131 Fernbrook Lane North Suite 104 Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 Re: Plat of Chapparal Dear Ms. Wilson: Thank you for sending us the title commitments and endorsements for the land underlying Chapparal. TELEPHONE (612) 335-9565 As you know, paragraph 30 of the Development Contract with Chanhassen provides that the developer will furnish the City with documentation evidencing fee ownership of the property proposed to be platted. In comparing the proposed plat dated October 30, 1978 with the title insurance commitment issued by Chicago Title, we find that the southern most portion of Outlot C is not covered in the title commitment. On the enclosed sketch map I have indicated in yellow that portion of Outlot C which does not appear to be mentioned in the title insurance materials. The missing property was apparently acquired by Dunn & Curry from Hanson & Klinglehutz Construction, Inc. Accordingly, please send us additional evidence showing that New Horizon has fee title to that portion of Outlot C. If you have any questions, please contact me. CMM:jep Enclosure cc Donald Ashworth Very truly yours, J/ CRAIG M. MERTZ Assistant Chanhassen City Attorney Q Nov 1978 a, RAVED VWJ.A6E ®F Ca �p CHA'NNAssm% ,. MINN. ��, WILLIAM D. SCHOELL CARLISLE MAOSON JACK T. VOSLER JAMES R. ORR AIM HAROLO E.OAHLIN LARRY L. HANSON 9:30_ 4% RAYMOND J. JACKSONs�T WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY JACK E. GILL RODNEY B. GORDON THEODORE D. KEMNA JOHN W.EMOND KENNETH E. ADOLF WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT BRUCE C. SUNOING SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC. ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS (6121 938-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 OFFICES AT HURON. SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON, TEXAS November 13, 1978 Mr. Craig Mertz Larson & Mertz, Attorneys at Law 1900 First National Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Subject: Dear Mr. Mertz: Chaparral (Formerly Carver's Pointe) Assessments The $166,766.00 in sewer and water assessments listed in our letter of October 6, 1976 assumed development of the subject property as shown in the preliminary plat of Carver's Point. The assessment principal amount for Chaparral according to the adop- ted criteria, should be $163,579.00 as itemized below: CF,APARRAL SEWER AND WATER ASSESSMENTS Lateral Sewer Units (Carver Beach) 11 @ $2,765.00 $ 30,415.00 Lateral Sewer Units (Greenwood Shores) 2 @ 1,714.00 3,428.00 Lateral Water Units (Carver Beach) 11 @ 1,486.00 16,346.00 Street Area Assessment 182,000 S.F. @ 0.10 S.F. 18,200.00 Trunk Sewer Units 95 @ 458.00 43,510.00 Trunk Water Units 95 @ 544.00 51,680.00 Total Final Assessments $163,579.00 �%-�21314_16" Nod 197g lie LL&.CHqaE 04 Mlty _u Mr. Craig Mertz November 13, 1978 Page Two Lateral Sewer Units Lateral Sewer Units Lateral Water Units Area Assessment Trunk Sewer Units Trunk Water Units SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC. ORIGINAL ASSESSMENTS (Carver Beach) (Greenwood Shores) (Carver Beach) 272,000 S.F. 5 @$2,765.00 2 @ 1,714.00 5 @ 1,486.00 @ 0.10/S.F. 7 @ 458.00/S.F. 7 @ 544.00/S.F. Total Original Assessment * 5 on Carver Beach, 2 on Greenwood Shores. $ 13,375.00 3,428.00 7,430.00 27,200.00 3,206.00 3,808.00 $ 58,447.00 Interest in the amount of 711 percent per year since the date of the original assessment will be added to the $105,132 ($163,579 - $58,447) in additional assessments. Since then additional assessments will be placed on the books in 1979 and the original assessment was levied in 1976, additional interest will be $23,654.70 (3 years x 7h%/yr. x $105,132). The total additional sewer and water assessments will be: $23,654.70 ¢ $105,132.00 = $128,786.70 The property will also be liable for street assessments on M.S.A.S. 101 of approximately $15.00 per front foot on $27,000 on the Chaparral property. The estimated construction cost of utilities and streets with- in the subdivision is estimated to be $390,211.00 as itemized on attached work sheets. The total cost, assuming 21% for engineering, staking, inspection and contingency costs, will be an estimated $472,155 (390,211 X 1.21). The City should require a cash escrow or bond of 110% of the total estimated cost or $519,370. If you have any questions, please contact us. Very truly yours, SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. WJBrezinsky:esg enclosure cc: Mr. Don Ashworth, City of Chanhassen RU55ELL H. LARSON CRAIG M. MERTZ Or COUNSEL HARVEY E.SKAAR MARK C. MCCULLOUGH LARSON & MERTZ ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 November 8, 1978 Mr. William Brezinsky City Engineer 50 Ninth Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 Re: Plat of Chaparral (Formerly Carver's Pointe) Dear Bill, TELEPHONE (612) 335-9565 In your January 31, 1978 report to the City on the Chaparral plat, you state that $166,776.00 in assessments must be recovered from the developer. This amount represents trunk and lateral benefits which were not included on the October 6, 1976 assessment rolls for the Greenwood Shores Project 75-3 and the Carver Beach Project 75-2. The plat of Chaparral contains 95 single family lots and three out - lots. Please compute 'the amount of unassessed Project 75-2 benefit which must be recovered. Please separately compute the amount of the Project 75-3 benefit which must be recovered. The City will be asking the developer to prepay 1/95 of these unassessed benefits every time an occupancy permit is issued. Please forward your computations to Mr. Ashworth with a copy directed to this office. Very truly yours, CRAIG M. MERTZ Assistant Chanhassen Attorney CMM:jep cc: Donald W. Ashworth R'ISSELL H. LARSON CRAIG M. MERTZ OF COUNSEL HARVEY E. SKAAR MARK C. McCULLOUGH Mr. Donald W. Ashworth City Manager Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Don, LARSON & MERTZ ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 November 8, 1978 TELEPHONE (612) 335-9565 Enclosed is our proposed development contract for Chaparral. All of the sewer easements which developer agreed to convey to the City are indicated on the proposed plat with the exception of Carver Beach easement No. 42. I have called this to the attention of Schoell & Madson. They will be making contact with New Horizon Homes to correct this ommission. Paragraph 10 of the development contract deals with the performance bond. I have left the amount blank. The developer has provided the City with a letter of credit in the amount of $462,237.60. If this is the amount that you and Mr. Brezinsky discussed, please fill in the blank in the paragraph accordingly. Paragraph 29 deals with special assessments. I have asked Mr. Brezinsky to compute the exact amount of unlevied Carver Beach Project and Greenwood Shores Project assessments which must be recovered from New Horizon Homes. Those amounts should be typed in the appropriate blanks of that paragraph. I have contacted New Horizon Homes asking that they provide this office with proof of title. The final plat should not be signed until this title information has been received and reviewed by the office. Very truly yours, CRAIG M. MERTZ Assistant Chanhassen Attorney CMM:jep Enclosure cc: Mr. Brezinsky BY MESSENGER CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLAT OF CHAPARRAL (FORMERLY CARVER'S POINTE) DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this day of 1978, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, and DUNN AND CURRY REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, INC., a Minnesota cor- poration, as fee owner and by NEW HORIZON HOMES, INC., a corporation, as contract purchaser. (Said fee owner and said contract purchaser are hereinafter referred to collectively hereinafter as the Developer), WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, The Developer is the owner of a -tract of land lying within the City of Chanhassen and more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the subject property is presently zoned R-lA, Agricultural Residence District; and WHEREAS, the Developer has made application under the City Zoning Ordinance for City Council approval of a Planned Residential Development District encompassing all of the subject property; said district and plat to contain approximately 46.5 acres more or less divided into approximately 100 single family residential lots in four blocks and to be known as Carver's Pointe - Chanhassen Lakes North; and WHEREAS, the Developer, with the consent of the City, has changed the name of the proposed plat from "Carver's Pointe - Chanhassen Lakes North" to "Chaparral"; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Planning Commission on March 8, 1978, to consider public comment on said development plan, plat, and rezoning; and WHEREAS, the City Council, by its resolution dated April 3, 1978, has approved said rezoning to P-1 and the develop- ment plan and preliminary plat of the Developer, subject to and on condition that the Developer enter into this agreement; and WHEREAS, approval of the development plan and preliminary plat of the Developer necessitated the vacation of West 68th Street from the Nez Perce west to County Road No. 17; and as �I WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Council on May 1, 1978, to consider public comment on said vacation; and WHEREAS, the City Council, by its resolution dated May 1, 1978, has approved the vacation of that portion of West 68th Street which lies westerly of Nez Perce and easterly of County Road No. 17; and WHEREAS, the City has established a policy requiring land developers to furnish surfaced streets, curbs, boulevard sodding, gutters, driveways, storm and surface water drainage facilities, street signs and lighting, municipal water and sanitary sewer faci- lities and underground electric and telephone service lines to all lots in plats approved by the City, all of the foregoing hereinafter sometimes referred to as "improvements"; and WHEREAS, the Developer has made application to the City to be allowed at Developer's expense to construct, install and perform all work and furnish all materials in connection with the installation of the following improvements: a. Street grading, stabilizing, and bituminous surfacing; b. Surmountable concrete curbs and gutters; C. Sanitary sewer mains; d. Water mains; e. Storm and surface water drainage; f. Street signs; g. Boulevard sodding or seeding; h. Driveway surfacing; i. Underground utility lines; and j. Street lighting. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and acceptance by the City of the preliminary development plan and plat of Chaparral, the City and the Developer agree as follows: 1. Improvements by Developer. Developer agrees at its expense to construct, install and perform all work and furnish all materials and equipment in connection with the installation of the following improvements in accordance with the preliminary plat described in Paragraph 28 below: a. Street grading, stabilizing, and bituminous surfacing; b. Surmountable concrete curbs and gutters; C. Sanitary sewer mains; d. Water mains; e. Storm and surfact water drainage; f. Street signs; g. Boulevard sodding or seeding; h. Driveway surfacing within the public street right of way; i. Underground utility lines; and j. Street lighting. -2- i 2. Standards of Construction. The Developer agrees that all of the foregoing improvements shall equal or exceed City standards, shall be constructed and installed in accordance with engineering plans and specifications approved by the City engineers and the requirements of applicable City ordinances and standards, and that all of said work shall be subject to the supervision of the City engineers. 3. Materials and Labor. All of the materials to be employed in the making of said improvements and all of the work performed in connection therewith shall be of uniformly good and workmanlike quality, shall equal or exceed City standards and specifications, and shall be subject to the inspection and approval of the City. In case any material or labor supplied shall be rejected by the City as defective or unsuitable, then such rejected material shall be removed and replaced with approved material, and rejected labor shall be done anew to the satisfaction and approval of the City at the cost and expense of the Developer. 4. Construction Traffic. All traffic of equipment, supplies, etc., relating to the construction and installation of the improve- ments described in paragraph 1 above shall be limited to the use of MSAS 101. 5. S_chedule of Work. The Developer agrees that it shall have all work done and the improvements described above in Paragraph 1 fully completed to the satisfaction and approval of the City on or before , 19 • The Developer shall submit a written schedule indicating theproposed progress schedule and order of completion of work covered by this contract, which schedule shall be a part of this contract. Upon receipt of written notice from the Developer of the existence of causes over which the Developer has no control which will delay the completion of the work, the City, in its discretion, may extend the date hereinbefore specified for completion. 6. Roads, Sanitary Sewer, Water, and Storm Sewer Facilities. a. Plans and Specifications. The Developer agrees to cause its engineers to prepare all plans and specifi- cations necessary for the installation of roads, curb, gutter, sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer facili- ties, including a final grading plan in and for said plat, said plans and specifications to be in substan- tial accord with the proposed plans thereof prepared by James R. Hill, Inc., and dated January 6, 1978, with the following modifications: i. Street right of ways within the plat shall be reduced to 50 feet. ii. The entire subdivision pattern shall be shifted 30 feet in an easterly direction. M-M N iii. The surface water drainage plan shall be subject to the approval of the Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District Board of Managers. iv. The Developer, in conjunction with the building inspector, shall develop a street naming plan which precludes the possibility of confusion with existing street names. V. All plans and specifications shall be subject to the final approval of the City Engineer. b. As -Built Plan. Upon completion of construction, the Developer shall cause its engineers to prepare and file with the City an "as built" plan showing the installation of the foregoing facilities within the plat. C. Easements. The Developer, at its expense, shall acquire all easements from abutting property.owners necessary to the installation'of the sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water facilities within the plat, and thereafter promptly assign said easements to the City. In addition, the Developer, for itself and for its successors and assigns, agree to convey to the City at no cost to the City, the easements which are more particularly described on Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof. 7. Reimbursement of Costs. The Developer shall reimburse the City for all costs, including reasonable engineering, legal, planning and administrative expenses incurred by the City in connection with all matters relating to the administration and enforcement of the within agreement and the performance thereby by the Developer. 8. Disclaimer by City. It is understood and agreed that the City, the City Council, and the agents and employees of the City shall not be personally liable or responsible in any manner to the Developer, the Developer's contractors or sub -contractors, material - men, laborers, or to any other person, firm or corporation whomsoever, for any debt, claim, demand, damages, actions or causes of action of any kind or character arising out of or by reason of the execution of this agreement or the performance and completion of the work and improvements hereunder; and that the Developer will save the City, the City Council, and the agents and employees of the City harmless from any and all claims, damages, demands, actions or causes of action arising therefrom and the costs, disbursements, and expenses of defending the same. 9. Written Work Orders. The Developer shall do no work nor furnish materials not covered by the plans and specifications for which reimbursement is expected from the City unless a written order for such work or materials is received from the City. Any such work -4- or materials which may be done or furnished by the Developer without such written order first being given shall be at its own risk, cost and expense, and Developer hereby agrees that without such written order, Developer will make no claim for compensation for work or materials so done or furnished. 10. Performance Bond. For the purpose of assuring and guaran- teeing to the City that the improvements to be by the Developer constructed, installed and furnished as set forth in Paragraph 1 hereof shall be constructed, installed and furnished according to the terms of this agreement, and that the Developer shall pay all claims for work done and materials and supplies furnished for the performance of this agreement and that the Developer shall fully comply with all of the other terms and provisions of this Development Contract. Developer agrees to furnish to the City either a cash deposit, a corporate surety bond approved by the City and naming the City as obligee thereunder, or an irrevocable letter of credit approved by the City in the following amount $ 11. Boulevards and Driveways. The Developer agrees to furnish, construct and install, at Developer's sole expense, the following improvements for the benefit of each lot within.the plat in accordance with the preliminary plat described in Paragraph 23 below: a. Boulevard sod or seeding, either of which shall be of uniformly good quality. b. Driveway surfacing within the public street right-of- way, the materials and installation of which shall be approved by the City Engineers. 12. Erosion Control. Developer, at its expense, shall provide temporary dams, earthwork or such other devices and practices, including seeding or graded areas, as shall be needed, in the judgment of the City Engineers, to prevent the washing, flooding, sedimen- tation and erosion of lands and roads within and outside the plat during all phases of construction, including construction on indivi- dual lots. Developer shall keep all streets free of all dirt and debris resulting from construction by the Developer, its agents or assignees upon the lands described in Exhibit A hereto. 13. Access. Reasonable access, including temporary grading and gravelling, shall be provided to all occupied residences'in the plat until the streets are accepted by the City. 14, Street Lighting. The expense of furnishing electrical energy for street lighting purposes shall be assumed by the City 24 months after completion of installation of the street lighting system, or after 50% of the building lots have been approved by the construction of residences thereon, whichever is first to occur. -5- 15. Replacement of Defective Work. All work and materials performed and furnished hereunder by the Developer, its agents and subcontractors, found by the City to be defective within one year after acceptance by the City, shall be replaced by Developer at Developer's sole expense. 16. Liability Insurance. The Developer shall take out and maintain so long as the Developer's obligations under Paragraphs 1 and 15 above continue, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors, or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury or death shall be not less than $100,000 for one person and $300,000 for each accident; limits for property damage shall be not less than $100,000 for each accident. The City shall be named as co-insured on said policy and the Developer shall file a copy of the insurance coverage with the City. 17. Water and Sewer Revenues. All water and sanitary sewer service charges shall at all times be billed by the City and all revenues derived therefrom shall be the sole property of the City. 18. Conveyance of Improvements. Upon completion of the installation by the Developer of the improvements set forth in Paragraph 1 hereof in accordance with the plans and specifications hereunder and the written approval by the City, the Developer shall convey said improvements to the City free of all liens and encum- brances and with warranty of title. Should the Developer fail to so convey said improvements, the same shall become the property of the City without further notice or action on the part of either party hereto, other than acceptance by the City. 19. Restrictive Covenants. Any proposed covenants or restric- tions to be placed upon the lots in said plat shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to recording with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles. 20. Building Permits and Occupancy Permits. Upon completion of the grading and placement of rock stabilizing materials for road construction within said plats, the City Building Inspector, upon the approval of the City Manager, shall be authorized to issue building permits for residential construction within said plats upon payment of all fees and charges applicable to the issuance of permits. The occupancy of any structure within said plats for residential purposes shall be prohibited by the City until the rock stabilizing base of the streets shall have been completed and municipal sanitary sewer and water lines shall have been installed and are available to serve the lot for which a building permit shall have been issued. ._N 21. Remedies Upon Default. a. Assessments. In the event the Developer shall default in the performance of any of the covenants and agree- ments herein contained, and such default shall not have been cured within ten days after receipt by the Deve- loper of written notice thereof, the City, if it so elects, may cause any of the improvements described in Paragraph 1 above to be constructed and installed or may take action to cure said default and may cause the entire cost thereof, including all reasonable engineering, legal and administrative expense incurred by the City, to be recovered as a special assessment under M.S. Chap. 429, in which case the Developer agrees to pay the entire amount of the assessment role pertaining to any such improvement within thirty days after its adoption. Developer further agrees that in the event of its failure to pay in full any such special assess- ment within the time prescribed herein, the City shall have a specific lien on all of Developer's real property within said plat for any amount so unpaid, and the City shall have the right to foreclose said lien in the manner prescribed for the foreclosure of mechanic's liens under the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event of an emergency, as determined by the City Engineers, the notice requirements to the Developer shall be and hereby are waived in their entirety, and the Developer shall reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City in remedying the conditions creating the emergency. b. Performance Bond. In addition to the foregoing, the City may also institute legal action against the Developer and the corporate surety on its performance bond, or utilize any cash deposit made or letter of credit delivered hereunder, to collect, pay or reim- burse the City for the cost of making any of said improve- ments, or for the cost of curing any default by the Developer in its performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained herein. C. Legal Proceedings. In addition to the foregoing, the City may institute any proper action or proceeding at law or at equity to prevent violations of the within development contract, to restrain or abate violations of the within development contract, or to prevent use of occupancy of the proposed dwellings. 22. Special Conditions. Landscaping and location of structures on individual lots shall be determined through discussions between City staff and Developer or their assigns prior to issuance of building permits, subject to the following standards and conditions: a. Landscaping and location of structures shall take into consideration the preservation of trees, slope protec- tion, subsurface. drainage, prevention of siltation and grim similar potential problems. b. In the event agreement cannot be reached between the City staff and Developer or their assigns, the City shall have the right, at the expense of the Developer or its assigns, to engage the services of the City Engineer, Planner,a landscape architect, a soil conservation consultant, and others, to advise as to specific problems. C. Developer shall prepare and submit to the City for its approval a landscape plan for the screening and buffering of the lots abutting CSAH 17 and MSAS 101. Said landscape plan may incorporate earth berms, plant materials and fences. d. The certificate of occupancy for each homesite, or covenants and restrictions, may contain conditions for tree maintenance, and restrictions on tree removal, after consultations with the City Forester. e. Individual site drainage, basement waterproofing and footing drains for each residential structure shall be installed when necessary or appropriate. 23. Receipt of Engineers' Report Acknowledged. Developer acknowledges receipt of the report of Schoell & Madson, Inc., City Engineers, dated January 31, 1978, relating to existing water services to serve the plat, and agrees to be bound by the determination of the City regarding any redistribution of existing assessments, the imposition of supplemental assessments as defined in Paragraph 29 below. 24. Easements to be Shown on Plat. Easements for drainage, storm water holding ponds, City access to storm water holding ponds for maintenance purposes and utility easements shall be shown on the final plat. 25. Trees to be Provided. The Developer shall provide each lot with one boulevard tree of a specie acceptable to the City For- ester and of a diameter of not less than 1-1/2". 26. No Variances. Developer agrees not to request, and under- stands that the City will not issue, any variances from the front yard setbacks and side yard setbacks depicted on the Developer's "Setbacks and Lot Areas" plan dated January 6, 1978, a copy of which is on.file in the office of the City's Zoning Administrator. , 27. Address of Developer. The address of the Developer for purposes of this development contract is New Horizon Homes, Inc., 3131 Fernbook Lane, Plymouth, Minnesota, 55441. 28. Final Plat. The Developer agrees to proceed immediately with the preparation of its final plat which shall conform to their approved preliminary plat as prepared by James R. Hill, Inc. and dated January 6, 1978 with the following modifications: a. Street right of ways within the plat shall be reduced to fifty feet in width. b. The entire subdivision pattern shall be shifted thirty feet in an easterly direction. c. The number of lots in Block 3 shall be reduced from thirty lots to a maximum of 28 lots. d. The number of lots in the northerly half of Block 1 shall be reduced from 6 lots to a maximum of 5 lots. 29. Special Assessment Payment Schedule. a. Developer Consents to Supplemental Assessment. The Developer acknowledges that the subject property derives special benefit from the sewer lift station facilities, trunk and lateral sanitary sewer facilities, and trunk and lateral water facilities which were constructed as a part of Chanhassen Improvement Project 75-2 (Carver Beach Sewer and Water Project), and as a part of Chan- hassen Improvement Project 75-3 (Greenwood Shores Sewer and Water Project). The Developer acknowledges that.the amount of said special benefit so derived from Project 75-2 exceeds the amount of the special assessments levied pursuant to Chapter 429 of Minnesota Statutes by resolution of the Chanhassen City Council adopted and dated October 6, 1976. The amount of said excess is ($ ), which sum is hereinafter referred to as the "Project 75-2 supplemental assessments". The Developer acknowledges that the amount of the special benefit described in the first sentence of this Paragraph 29 and derived from Project 7573 exceeds the amount of the special assessments levied pursuant to Chapter 429 of Minnesota Statutes by resolution of the Chanhassen City Council adopted October 6, 1976. The amount of said excess is ($ ), which sum is hereinafter referred to as the "Project 75-3 supplemental assessments". The Developer agrees that the entire amount of the Project 75-2 supplemental assessments and the entire amount of the Project 75-3 supplemental assessments shall be paid by the Developer as special assessments levied against the properties proposed plat in twenty- six (26) equal semi annual installments, together with interest on unpaid installments at the rate of seven and one-half (7 1/2%) percent per annum accruing from October 6, 1976. Said semi annual installments shall commence on May 30, 1979, with installments due on the 31st day of each October thereafter and the 30th day of each May thereafter until October 31, 1991, on which date any remaining principal balance plus accrued interest shall be paid. Said semi annual installments shall be inclusive of and applied first to accrued interest and the remainder shall be applied to reduce principal. The Developer shall have the right and privilege to prepay the full amount of the then outstanding Project 75-2 supplemental assessments or the full amount of the then outstanding Project 75-3 supplemental assessments, together with accrued interest thereon, at any time. b. Developer Waives Public Hearing and Right of Appeal. The Developer waives its right to public hearing under §429.061 and 429.071 of Minnesota Statutes and its right of appeal under §429.081 of Minnesota Statutes as to the Project 75-2 supplemental assess- ments and as to the Project 75-3 supplemental assess- ments. C. Acceleration of Payment Schedule. In the event that an occupancy permit is applied for for any residential structure constructed upon any lot in the proposed plat, the payment of the Project 75-2 supplemental assessments and the Project 75-3 supplemental assessments shall be accelerated as provided in Paragraph 29(d) below. d. Payments Due Prior to Occupancy. No residential structure within the proposed plat shall be occupied until the developer has paid in full all unpaid special as.sessments levied against the lot on which said structure has been erected. The term "all unpaid special assessments" shall be deemed to include: i. Any outstanding City sewer and water hook-up charges and any charges owing to Metropolitan Abstract Control Commission. ii. One ninty-fifth (1/95) of the total amount of the Project 75-2 supplemental assessments, including accrued interest thereon, less the sum of any principal payments made theretofore and applied against said Project 75-2 supplemental; -assessments. iii. One ninty-fifth'. (1/95) of the total amount of the Project 75-3 supplemental assessments, including accrued interest thereon, less the sum of any -10- principal payments made theretofore and applied against said Project 75-3 supplemental assessments, and iv. One ninty-fifth. (1/95) of the then outstanding principal balance, together with accrued interest thereon of the Project 75-2 and Project 75-3 special assessments which were levied by the Chanhassen City Council by resolutions adopted October 6, 1976. 30. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that they are fee owners of the subject property. 31. Successors and Assigns. It is agreed by and between the parties hereto that the agreement herein contained shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of their respective legal representa- tives, successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed on the day and year first above written. NEW HORIZON HOMES, INC. DUNN AND CURRY REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, INC. By By -- Its Its And And Its Its CITY OF CHANHASSEN By Its Mayor Attest: City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF CARVER ) ss. On this day of _ , 1978, before me, a notary public within and for said county, personally appeared Walter Hobbs and Donald W. Ashworth, to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn, did say that they are respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its City Council, and said Watler Hobbs and Donald W. Ashworth acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. -11- Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF ) ss. On this day of , 1978, before me, a notary public within and for said county, personally appeared and I to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn, did say that they are respectively the and the _ of NEW HORIZON HOMES, INC., and that the seal affixed to said instru- ment is the corporate seal of said corporation, and that said instru- ment was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and said and acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF ) ss. On this day of , 1978, before me, a notary public within and for said county, personally appeared and , to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn, did say that they are respectively the and the of DUNN AND CURRY REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, INC., and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and said and acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. Notary Public -12- Cz S ORDER NO. 8759 f/ WILLIAM O. SCHOELL ,EGISTEREDCIVILENOINEEM SCHOELL �. MADSON, iNc. M/NN. 110. y7a• gO. OAK. 7s•o WIG. N0. E-6174 /LOMIDA NO. 627, NO. OAK. 623 MONT. NO. 1 • 1 •-[ IOWA NO. &923 ENGINEERS 6 SURVEYORS 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH HOPKIN5. MINNE30TA 55343 PHONE 030-70017 DESCRIPTION CARLISLE MADSON REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 644"N. NO. 4374 00. OAK. 791 WIS• ND. 8-a74 IOW^ NO. 3705 N O. OAK. 1 1 D• MONT. 140. 1742-5 EXHIBIT "B" CITY OF CHANHASSEII FORT "That (TEACH AREA SAiIITARY SEWER AND WATERMAINS Chaparral." Revised That portion of the following easement which lies within plat of/ 2-13-76 42) A 30.00 foot temporary construction easement and a 14.00 foot perpetual easement for watermain purposes over, under and across the N 1/2, Sec. 12 following described property: Torrens Starting at a point in the centerline of Lakeview Drive which is Ctf. No. distant, in a Northwesterly direction, 484.118 feet from the inter- 7001 section of the centerlinesof said Lakeview Drive and Fern Road as it appears on the "Map of Carver Beach" at Long Lake, Carver County, Minnesota, according to the plat thereof, on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County of Carver and State of Minnesota and running thence S. 750 07' 00" W. a distance of 3.240 feet to the point of intersection of tangents of a curve with a radius of 278.141 feet swinging Westerly and at the centerline of Dogwood Road of the aforesaid "Iiap of Carver Beach"; thence N. 65° 20' 00" W. along the tangent of the same curve a distance of 29.336 feet to a point in the same said tangent; thence S. 24° 40' 09" W. a distance of 10 feet plus or minus, to a point on the Southerly side of said Dogwood Road which is the POINT OR PLACE OF BEGII-liIING; from thence, along the southerly side of Dogwood Road, the following courses and distances: Westerly, along a curve with a radius of 298.141 feet; a distance of approximately 75. feet to a concrete monument on,the ground; thence N..650 20' 00' W. 740.284 feet to a point of curve; thence along this curve which has a radius of 609.922 feet, a distance of 246.849 feet to a point of tangent-, thence 11. 880 31' 20" W. a distance of 2387 23399 feet to the centerline of Excelsior Road,as it appears on the "Map of Carver Beach"; thence S. 10 07' 10" W. a distance of 180.01 feet to a point; thence S. 10 50' 10" W. 420.005 feet'to the most westerly point of this parcel as it is conveyed; thence S. 880 31' 20" E., 2,234.85 feet; thence S. 20 34' 40" E. 406.02 feet; thence S. 88631' 20" E. 1254.73 feet; thence N. 10 28' 40" E. along the 1-lesterly side of a Right of flay, a distance of 370. feet plus or minus; thence and still along the westerly,side of same said Right of flay, ll. 220 21' 40" U. a distance of 260. feet plus or minus, to the POINT OR PLACE OF BEGINNING. Excluding all that portion of Excelsior Road which runs Southwesterly along the West Boundary of this parcel as described. Excepting from the above property, the following described parcel: Starting at a point in the centerline of Lakeview Drive which is distant in a Northwesterly direction, 484.118 feet from the inter- section of the centerlines of said Lakeview Drive and Fern Road as it appears on the "Hap of Carver Beach" at Long Lake, Carver County, Minnesota, according to the plat thereof, on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County of (Continued) Page 1 of 3. ORDER r.1O.— R%�Q WILLIA64 D. ■CHO[LL A[0I1IT9141[O CIVIL ENOIN[[R MINN. NO, 2266 00. OAK. 796 W16. NO. 9.6ITO r LO1110A NO. &a7I NO. OAK. Gas MONT. NO. 1 • 1 6.19 IOW^ NQ. 69731 SCHOELL I& MAOSON, INC. ENGINEERS 6 SURVEYORS SO NINTH AVENUE SOUTH HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343 PHONE 930-7cal DESCRIPTION CARLISLE HADSON REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR M IN N. NO. 4374 go. OAK. 791 MI16. NO. 6.674 IOWA NO, a70s "(3- OAK. 1 sag MONT. NO. 1742-2 Revised Fowl CITY OF CHANHASSEN - --- ---- --_ 2-13-76 CA:;UER BEACH AREA SANITARY SEWER AND WATERNAI1111S 42) (Continued) N 1/2, Sec. 12 Carver and State of ?Minnesota, and running thence South 750 07' Torrens 00" West a distance of 3.240 feet to the point of intersection of tangents of Ctf. No. 7001 a curve with a radius of 278.141 feet swinging westerly and at the centerline of Dogwood Road of the aforesaid "Map of Carver Beach"; thence North 650 20' 00" West along the tangent of the same curve a distance of 29.336 feet to a point in the same said tangent; thence South 240 40' 00" West a distance of 10 feet, or minus, plus to a point on the Southerly side of said Dogwood Road, thence along the Southerly side of Dogwood Road, the following courses and distance:. Westerly, alon a curve with a radius of 298.141 feet, a distance of approximately 75 feet to a concrete monument on the ground; thence North 650,201 00" West 740.284 feet to a point of curve; thence along this curve which has a radius of 609.922 feet, a distance of 246.849 feet to a point of tangent; thence North 880 31' 20" {rest a distance of 631.913 feet to apoint the on southerly line of said Dogwood Road where the same intersects with an extension of the East line of Highland Drive, as the same is shown on said Carver Beach Map, said point being the point of beginnin of this description; thence running South at an angle of 93 22' on an extension of said East line of said Highland Drive 170.34 feet to a point on said extension line; thence running East at an angle of 86o 38' parallel to the South line of said Dogwood Road, 145.41 feet to -a point; thence North at an angle of 900, 170.05 feet to a point on the South line of said Dogwood Road, which said point -is 135.41 feet from the point of beginning, thence West at an angle of 90031 135.41 feet to the place of beginning. Said temporary easement being 30.00 feet to the right of the following described line and said perpetual easement being 14.00 feet to the right of the following described line. Beginning at the intersection of the northerly line of Dogwood Road as dedicated in Carver -Beach, according to the recorded plat thereof and the westerly line of Lakeview Drive (now known as Kiowa Avenue) as dedicated in said plat; thence on an assumed bearing of South 22 degrees 21 minutes 40 seconds East, along the southerly extension of the westerly line of said Lakeview Drive, to the southerly line of said Dogwood Road; thence continuing South 22 degrees 21 minutes 40 seconds East, along said southerly extension a distance of 200.00 feet; thence South 1 degree 28 minutes 40 seconds llest a distance of 296.67 feet d y d there terminating. an sa1 i ne ---- — ----._----(Continued)-_ Paae 2 of I s /WILLIAM ORDER NO. 8759 O. ■cNocLL a[ai�Tcw[U CIVIL [NOINccw S C H O E L L& M A O S O N , INC. CARLISL[ MADMON MINK. NO. ]]ii ENGINEERS a SURVEYORS RE01STERED LAND SURVEYOR 00. OAK. 768 30 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH MINN. NO. 4374 W10. NO. 9•0176 ILOIIIDANO. 6371 HOPKINS, MINN[90TA 35343 00. OAK. 791 wli. NO. 6•674 NO. OAK. 073 PHONU 030-75dt IOw^ ND, 370% MONT. NO. 1 01 A•[ NO, pA K. I I0III IOW^ NO. 6713 DESCRIPTION MONT. NO, 1742-8 P90111h CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER BEACH AREA SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAINS Revised 42) (Continued) 2-13-76 Together with a 30.00 foot temporary construction easement and a 14.00 N 112, Sec. 12 foot perpetual easement for watermain purposes over, under and across the above described property. The center line of both easements is Torrens described as follows: Ctf. No. 7001 Beginning at the terminus of the above described line; thence North 88 degrees 35 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of 109.38 feet; thence South 1 degree 22 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 100.00 feet and said center line there terminating. Said temporary easements to expire December 31, 1976. Page 3 of 3. . zoz/� 9 7A 00"