78-03 - Minnewashta Creek 1st Add PUD pt 1�41'�,'�'�°l� pro-.ssional engineers and surveyors
DER SON
P.O. Box 665 2665 4th Avenue North Anoka, Minnesota 55303 6121427-5660
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
Survey for: Northland Mortgage Co.
DESCRIPTION
Lot 9, Block 3, Norwood Park Estates,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
;a ,
30
Parcel A
The north 31.67 feet of Lot 9, Block 3, Norwood
Park Estates, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Parcel B -
Lot 9, Block 3, Norwood Park Estates, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, EXCEPT the north 31..67 feet thereof.
Scale: �" -�gO
l3k. Pg-
Sec. T. R. o Denotes iron monument
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State
of Minnesota. �EY/SED �'30 81' <100E0 �eoPasaa 2ss.
-(i - Reg. No. date Job No.
8 '? -1A
A KANSON
IINDERSON
ASSSOCIATES, Inc.
P.O. Box 665 2665 4th Avenue North
professional engineers and surveyors
Anoka, Minnesota 55303 6121427-5860
CERTIFICATE OF � '_ �,-VEY
Survey for: Northland Mortgage Co.
DESCRIPTION:
Lot 5, Block 4, Norwood Park Estates,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
0
"n
h 'o1 6 �9a' `�``%F �I `
Nq
24.67 m 3 PES. �Y I^
IM `� z5.33
I
30 i 4353.B.<v A7 +:
to 12- • 6/
PARCEL A: The south 34.83 feet of Lot 5, Block 4, NORWOOD PARK ESTATES,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
PARCEL B: Lot 5, Block 4, NORWOOD-PARK ESTATES, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, except the south 34.83 feet of said lot.
Scale: /A
Bl<. pg-
Sec. 3 , T. /d- , R. ZI o Denotes iron mor:urren<:.
hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepay' `'py me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor the laws of the State
.PE✓�SeO : �-�;'3-B/ gvo�o G.eoPaseo ��s.
of Minnesota.
Reg. No. Date Job No.
02 / D,�' —/a- PA -? -20 .
AKAA1.j N
NDER SON
ASSOCIATES, Inc.
P, 0, Box 665 2665 4th A venue North
professional engineers and surveyors
Anoka, Minnesota 55303 6121427-5860
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
Survey for: H. E. Homes
DESCRIPTION:
Lot 6, Block 2, Norwood Park Estates-,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
ga
�JyV
v,
M
37. 65_
/
(� ORq/N.06E
F.vO
Lg Ur/c / r v
� �g6EMEiVf
Vq
Scale: y" _.`r0
Bk.
9
Sec. 3 , T. //9 , R. Zi o Denotes iron monument
PARCEL A: That Dart of Lot
6, Block 2, INOR,v00D PARK
ESTATES, Hennepin County,
9innesota, -which lies
westerly of a line drawn
from a point on the southerl,
line of said lot distant
61.73 feet easterly of the
southwest corner of said lot,
as measured along said
southerly line, to a point
on the north line of said
.lot distant 20.15 feet
easterly of the northwest
corner of said lot.
PARCEL B: That part of lot
6, Block 2, '�ORt•lOOD PA°K
ESTATES. Hennepin County,
11i nnesota , which lies
easterly of a line drawn
from a point on the southerly
line of said lot distant
61.78 feet easterly of the
southwest corner of said lot,
as rePsured along said
southerly line, to a 'point
on the north line of said
lot. distant 201.15 feet
easterly of the northwest
corner of said lot.
I hereby certify that
this survey,
plan or report was prepared by me or
under my direct
supervision and that
I am a duly
Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
PEv�s�o.v so 8/ 400Eo
PQooarco ��S
Reg. No. Date
Job No.
�
a
CASE NUMBER.
APPLICANT:
PROPOSED REQUEST:
LOCATION OF REQUEST:
SIZE:
DENSITY:
PRESENT ZONING:
CONTIGUOUS LAND USE:
PARK DEDICATION:
Mil
ol
ITEM # 6 C.
7981776,
ROAD
P A R
> PA 4 T
1 U E E EN
-113APK I
��7
83R
W 0
77:
>
Z
PE RSON
LL
F E S
E STATE
4
R
z
`O
NORTHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY
Waiver of Platting #1981-1480
for double bungalow splits (10)
at 82nd & Logan, Morgan,Newton-
& Queen Aves. No.
7"
A
Oloft�_ Ei
2
510
Momplam
L
F
i' P - - �` VE" i
PLANNING STAFF REPORT
Page 2
NORTHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY, Waiver #1981-1480
BACKGROUND:
The lots in question were approved for double bungalows as a. part of the
P.D.A. for Norwood Park Estates final plat. The special circumstances
which qualified the area for a P.D.A. were the Standard Oil Pipeline
easement, the existing soil conditions, and a need to reduce the front
building setbacks to 25'.
Special requirements were applied to those lots which are adjacent to
the City park, including the following:
® A 20 foot easement be collected on all lot lines,
common with a City park, and a prohibition of all clear -
cutting of trees which are greater than 5 inches in
diameter.
a Where existing vegetation is not an adequate buffer between
the public and private property there must be additional
landscape plantings.
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
Of the
10 lots
which the City Council approved
for
double bungalows,
only
three are
ackward for development.
The double
bungalow
designs
have
been varied and the units are scattered
in this
subdivision
so
as to
minimize
any negative effects from
concentrating
them
in one area.
Close
inspection
of the lots reveals they
have the
following
dimensions:
Width of the "half
lots at
Square footage
of
the front propert,
line
each hal:
lot
Lot
1-Block 1
96.60'
67.46'
7,132
4,517
Lot
2-Block 2
31.33'
27.38'
11,064
7,759
Lot
6-Block 2
61.78'
43.00'
4,662
4,910
Lot
.10-Block 2
71.001.
90.84'
9,062
8,710
-Block 3
LoeJ9
.41.23'
85.56'
5,154
8,049
LoBlock
3
31.67'
84.76'
3,958
7,951
Lot
5-Block 4
34.83'
75.53'
4,354
6,796
Lot
8-Block 4
40.00'
83.15'
5,000
7,749
Lot
10-Block 6
47.31'
45.77'
4,601
4,087
Lot
1-Block 7
64.17'
65.39'
45507
4,474
The minimum size for any of these lots should be 3,564 sq. ft. of area
and 26.4' of lot frontage because of the 2/3 rule on P.D.A. lots.
As you.can see from above, all of these proposed splits exceed these
figures. There is only one lot which the staff would like to recommend
a change in the drawings, that being Lot 9, Block 3. Staff recommends
that each of the "half lots" have as close to 40' of -frontage as possible.
PLANNING STAFF REPORT
Page 3
NORTHLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY, Waiver #1981-1480
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of nine double bungalows (Waiver of Platting
#1981-1480) subject to the applicant providing proof to the City of
the County's recording of the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions prior to the City's release of the waiver resolution
(for title recording purposes).
Staff recommends approval of Lot 9, Block 3, provided that the applicant
redraws the certificate of survey to indicate the repositioning of
the common property line so that each parcel has as close to 40' of
frontage as possible.
Note: A City council member has indicated an interest in conditioning
waivers of platting with the normal minimum landscaping (i.e., 4 trees,
4 shrubs, and entire lot sodded) which has been required on Conditional
Use Permits for doubles. This is only a suggestion.
Respectf ul)y,s ubmi tted ,
l/ / z:.
Willard D. Neumeister
Associate Planner
WDN :.mp
\ 3„ (",'lo1O;4
Norwood Park Estates
'I �' _ -/ ;• %�
Final Plat
1. ;_'n-3 c
14,
3m:]AV ON
—Otit• i�
o� I— 1—�_•-,� 1(I �II _' -.,c ___ } `ice y? 3..r;.clpe .�) �� •
Y�' y' •.,� � ^: I.F.^ ��. �a.-...: .. .. ".,.r—� `—__Lv s'ci--i r �o
r--� --; Represents the
lots approved
for doubles
m I- I i w••' - I �- I'• N� M l'J o 'Z
co
La
to � i:? _ z tt :.�;zr � •n U
7(1tJ�i�� , J./:` (n
—0
-
,t °I.
L; ;t,c<. [3ry.>.y. .,•1. _ t i ---.: -3—
.d`
'`c�'c'y.at,y'•y" _
'S ny+i
I e rr-:. _ � t y . ��'�•.•— I ^�. -� ,ems i ,., O< �
In
C,
LO
co
to
ri
I t,ol ON unlol. LFLSJ /
AN
CL ( a,
AKANS6N
ND �'ON
A5'SOCIATESi I"c.
P.O. Box 665 2665 4th Avenue North
professional engineers and surveyors
Anoka, Minnesota 55303 6121427-5860
CERTtFICATE OF SURVEY
Survey for: Northland Mortgage Co.
DESCRIPTION:
Lot 10, Block 2, Norwood Park Estates,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
_ 30
,
kQ 9,O6zSq. Fr
l e k 25.33
m 'a v,
W ro Z4.67 0
mh
--/25.0� - - — -
m' 24 67
8741) SQ. Fr.
�9s��''�Nr �
Parcel A /�j
That part of Lot 10, Block 2,
Norwood Park Estates, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, lying north of a 1i-ne drawn from
a point on the east line of said lot distant 71.00 feet south
line
of the northeast corner Gooffsaid
slot
thtofathepoint
northvrest corner
of Isaid lot.
of sal"d lot distant
Parcel B
That part of Lot 10, Block 2, �lorwood Park Estates, Hennepin County, t-linnesota,
Scale: 1yi ng south of a 1 i ne drawn from a point on the east line of
said lot distant 71.00 feet south of file northeast corner of
Bk. Pg• said lot to a point on the west line of said lot distan
Sec. �3 , T. ll� R. � o enotes iron monument) i3.9& feetsouth south of the
northwest corner of said 1 °'
hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor
i o-under
the al o s of oeoPe State
of Minnesota.
Reg. No. Date ,fob No.
w A
8' /6 -ad
AKANSON
NDER SON
ASSOCIATES, Inc.
P.O. Box 665 2665 4th A venue North
professional engineers and surveyors
Anoka, Minnesota 55303 6121427-5660
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
30
i
9
Survey for: Northland Mortgage Co.
DESCRIPTION:
Lot 3, Block 3, Norwood Park Estates,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
i
op
8, 0 1 9 1SQ. Fr. zs. as h , ` 1 mP�aoasEo� m 2
o� � .24.67 NN-,`__3
00—-- 0 Wes`•;
M
24.17 M h eEs. i t I�� I to
In
LV
.si.30
►i I q
l
Parcel
P A
I
The .so_uth 41.23 feet of .Lot 3, Block 3, Norwood Park Estates, Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
Parcel B
Lot 3, Block 3, Norwood Park Estates, Hennepin County, Minnesota, EXCEPT the
south 41.23 feet thereof.
Scale:
Bk. Pg.
Sec. , T. , R. o Denotes iron monument
1 hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State
of Minnesota. ef��rEo = i 3o-ei .gooe'o peo.-osco ,ees.
Reg. No. Date Job No.
. BaFRIS N
y ASSOCIATES,, Inca
P.O. Box 665 2665 4th A venue North
CETIIT
Survey for: H. E. Homes
DESCRIPTION:
Lot 8, Block 4, Norwood Park Estates.
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Qrnfassional txnginam and svrwyors
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
F SURVEY
.23.6 7 ID
P,2000sEN /4.6 � Q
�''�•" � �q.����s � DES.. A v ' � .
73.G7 •: 2,? 33
Parcel A
The north 40.00 feet of Lot 8, Block 4,
NORW0OD PARK ESTATES Hennepin County Minnesota.
6121427.5860
1A.
Parcel B
h'ihat part of Lot 8, Block 4, NORWOOD PARK ESTATES,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying south of the north 40.00 feet.
Scale: % ` -#0
Elk. pg. ---�
Sec. , T. , R. o Denotes iron monument
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that i am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State
of Minnesota. �'E✓/JEO = 3'3D gI f%p01p Gaeoias�o E?s.
*1704
Reg. No. Date .lob No.
��AKANSON
�j NdlERSON
ASSOCIATES, Inc.
P.O. Box 665 2665 4th A venue North
Survey for: Northland Mortgage Co.
professional engineers and surveyors
Anoka, Minnesota 55303 6121427-5860
DESCRIPTION:
Lot 10, Block 6, Norwood Park Estates,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
A
1; DES
1 � d
UT/L/TY_EASEMENT a,r� `�
.4l0
PARCEL A: That hart of Lot 10, Block 6, NORWOOD PARK ESTATES, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, which" lies west of a line drawn from a point on the north line of said
lot distant 45.77 feet westerly of the northeast corner of said lot to a point or,
the south line of said lot distant 46.96 feet1westerly of the southeast corner of
Said lot.
PARCEL B: That part of Lot 10, Block 6, NORWOOD PARK ESTATES, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, which lies east of a line drawn from a point on the north line of said
lot distant 45.77 feet westerly of the northeast corner of said lot to a point on
the south line of said lot distant 46.96 feet westerly of the southeast corner of
said lot.
Scale: _ 4O /
Bk. Pg. ��
Sec. � , T. /� , R. 2 o Denotes iron monument
hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State
of Minnesota. .PEr/s�o z�-A/ AvoEo P2oPosEo Pis
Reg. No. Date Job No.
Section 3G6.03, 366.04, 366.06, 367.01, 367.03, 367.05 amended and
Section 366.06 (c) (3) repealed by Ordinance i1979-304(A)
Section 366.03 Subd. (c) subsection (6) (1) of the City Code is
amended to read as follows:
I. The outside storage cute ide-of-a-building-of of
an ag:q'Loj.ge of not more than two (2) of the following:
Building for winter ice fishing, mobile camp trailer,
camper, ul ility-trae6e r-r boat over 16 feet, automobile
racer, provided the above named are owned by the resident
and further providcd_th at there _shall be no storage of
said mafer_i_1s or e•-uic•r..ent v, Lh u_ frunt and setGack or
- 1 -'- -- Y----- -
wrtFln 5 lect from the side and rear property lines.
Section 366.03 Subd. (d) Subsection (0) of the City Code is amended
to read as follows:
Roadside stands for sale of he�ne-eeedpaEion;-predneks-er
horticulture products produced on the site.
Section 366.04 Subd. (d) (8) of the City Code is amended to read
as follows: -
(8) Roadside stands for sale of home-eeenpal:tensr-preddets
er horticulture products produced on the site.
Section 366.06 (c) is amended to repeal and delete Subsection (3)
which reads as follows:
43}--Aece.eery-buildings-ether-then-garagea-
Section 367.01 (a) of the City Code is amended to read as
follows: ..
Section 363.02, 366.03 c., 366.03 b., 366.05 b. amended by Ord. 1979-2971R)
1. Section 363.02 of the zoning Code is amended to add the following:
f. Animal Units: The following animals constitute one animal
unit equivalency; one cow or steer, one horse, donkey or
burrow, three sheep, or i00 fowl. Any animal ncE afore-
mentioned shall be considered one anima] unit enuivalen�.
Common hous�e_s shall he deCinec3 as ems, cats, birds
and rodents owned Ly the resident and kept as pets.
2. Section 366.03 _c. Conditional Uses of the zoning Code is amended
to add the following:
(8) The keeyinq_of livestock and livestock husbandry that exeeds
one animal unit c.er acr=n aggregate.
3. Section 366.03b Permitted Uses of the Zoning Code is amended to
add the following:
(6) The keeping of common house pets.
4. Section 366.05b. Permitted Uses of the Zoning Code is amended
to add the following:
(3) The keeping_ of common house meets.
Section 366.10 c.(6) amended and Section 363.02 aaaaa. added
j by Ordinance 1979-308)A) -
' (6) Restaurants (Class II) when located within a
hotel, motel, enclosed shopping mall, or in a
A. In Residential Districts. All materials and equipment, )
exec•pt licrnscd motor hicies and except as_provided by
other sections of tthis co;3e cermittinc storage of certain
items ascrrrittec accessory use, shall be stored within
a building or fully screened so as not to lie visible from
adjoining properties, except for the following: Laundry
drying and recreational equipment, construction and land-
scaping materials and equipment currently (within period
of 12 months) being used on the premises, agricultural
equipment and materials if these are used or intended for
use on the premises.
Section 3G7.03 Subsection (c)of the City Code is amended to read
as follows:
c. All exterior storage shall be screened. The exceptions
are: (a) merchandise being displayed for sale,
(b) materials and equipment bieng used for construction
on premises, and (a) merchandise located on service
pump islands.-, and r61 or as Lermitted under specific
sections of this code or as authorizc�� Conditional
Use Permit.
Section 367.05 (c) is amended to read as follows:
c. Required Off-street Parking` The following minimum areas
shall be provided and main tat red by ownership, casement,
or lease, fSr and slur ing the life of the respective uses
hereinafter set forth. In Residential Districts R-5 and R-6
parking stalls required by the zoning Ordinance as ended
shall be located to the rear of the front of the building;
except that, in the case of a corner lot no off-street
parking stalls or parking shall be permitted beyond the ex-
tension of the building line to the adjacent streets from
the front or side of the building. 'the maneuvering areast
access aisles, driveways and parking spaces shall be no
closer than five (5) feet to the property lines. Parking
areas and driveways shall be surfaced. The parking stalls
shall be striped and repainted as necessary.
Subsections 1 through 26 shall remain in force and there is no
change in the wording of said subsections.
s,oppin-n-gen. er cr cc _m.erc} P.U_p _SK�ect to
the follown�conditions:
a. 'The estarlisl:ncnt rust lie 1.42catecl on the site
of a shopyin, center.
Is. 'There 'shall be no darciny_ or live entertainment
' perre itt ed.
c. The number of seats available for drinking only
at thtar
ar shall not exceed 10@ the n;Tb cer
available for cat i. r. Liquor small not be
served 1.. 1, food is nq_ bet rp served.
d. They shall be subject to all conditions of
Section 605 and 36G.11 d (9).
e. 'Li�c uor licenses in shoo Dcir�centers or cormer-
eial Y.0 .D_s which aCunr are cicse to residen-
•tiel areas will be fug?:e_ccnditicr.ed to limit
'activities which woulc" have an= dyer<r. a%fee-
on the residential _ _ ties '1L the C'tv
Council. will review all. a v, add
_.further conditions nr. spry to Lc t:e
health, safety_ae=pc-r.er2l •_cifare of the area.
_After Council a;-2r2:a2 of the site_-p_is�_uu-
bd-
fnprplans or C.J.P._he 'n:ildi, plans r.hall
not be altered wiinout City Council' aryrcval.
• • • • Is Is •
aaaaa.-Sho_ppIng center: A buildir.R of two or more stores or
or s)�o ps or a series of cr.^e rcial build toes a�vroved
'es a Planned Unit Devel_:r L t co::taini, a r.=n ir_•um of 5
•acres or contiguous ecrmercial orote sties t1�at con ti-
'tute 5 acres or more.
limit within which a final development
plan of all units within the project shall
be filed with the Zoning Administrator
for submission to the Planning Com-
mission and the Village Council.
e. The Village Council may 1) ap-
prove the preliminary development
plan and application for rezoning, 21
disapprove the preliminary develop-
ment plan and application for rezoning
stating reasons for the disapproval, or
3) approve the preliminary develop-
ment plan and application for rezoning
subject to specified modifications and
conditions.
Final Development Plan:
a. A final development plan shall be
filed with the Zoning Administrator to
be submitted to the Planning Commis-
sion and the Village Council within the
time limit specified by the Planning
Commission as provided in subsection
4d. above.
b. The final development plan shall
include the following: 1) preliminary
plat in accordance with the applicable
provisions of Ordinance 33. Chanhassen
Subdivision Ordinance, including
agreements, provisions, covenants and
specifications required for approval of
the final development plan, 2) final
building drawings and specifications, 31
final site plans including a landscape
schedule, 4 ► engineering plans and re-
ports as required by the Council, 5) any
other information or documents re-
quired by the Council for the approval
of the final development plan including
a planned unit development contract
and any bonds, deposits of money or
security.
c. Approval of the final development
plan shall not be granted by the Village
Council unless it finds the following: 1)
the proposed development is not in con-
flict with the Comprehensive Village
Plan, 2) the proposed development is
designed in such a manner as to form a
desirable and unified environment
within its own boundaries, 3) the pro-
posed uses will not be detrimental to
present and future land uses in the sur-
rounding area, 4) any exceptions to the
zoning and subdivision ordinances are
justified by the design of the develop-
ment, 51 the planned development is of
sufficient size, composition and ar-
rangement that its construction and
operation is feasible as a complete unit
without dependence upon any other
unit, 6) the planned development will
not create an excessive burden on
parks, schools, streets and other public
facilities and utilities which are pro-
posed to serve the development, 7) the
planned development will not have an
adverse impact on the reasonable en-
joyment of neighboring property.
d. The Village Council may 1) ap-
prove the final development plan, 2)
disapprove the final development plan
stating reasons for the disapproval, or
3) approve the final development plan
subject to specified modifications and
conditions.
e. If approved, the final development
plan shall be filed in the office of the
Zoning Administrator.
14.06 Revisions and Changes.
Minor Changes: Minor changes in the
placement and height of buildings or
structures may be authorized by the
Zoning Administrator if required by
engineering or other circumstances not
foreseen at the time the final develop-
ment plan was approved. Any such au-
thorization shall be in writing and filed
in the office of the Zoning Administra-
tor.
Amendments: Changes in uses, any re-
arrangement of lots, blocks, or building
tracts, any changes relating to common
open space areas, and all other changes
in the approved final development plan
may be made by the Village Council
only after a public hearing by the Plan-
ning Commission and the submission of
its recommendations thereon to the Vil-
lage Council. No amendments may be
made in the approved final develop-
ment plan unless they are found to be
required by changes in conditions
which have occurred subsequent to
approval of the final development plan,
or by changes in the development poli-
cy of the Village. All such changes shall
be filed in the office of the Zoning Ad-
ministrator as amendments to the final
development plan.
14.07 Annual Review.
1. Planning Commission Review. The
Planning Commission shall review all
Planned Unit Development Districts at
least once each ,year and submit a re-
port to the Village Council on the status
of development.
2. Village Council Action: If the Village
Council finds that development has not
occurred within a reasonable time af-
ter approval of the final development
plan, the Village Council may instruct
the Planning Commission to initiate
rezoning to the original zoning district
by removing the Planned District zon-
ing.
14.08 Building Design and Construc-
tion.
1. Multiple Residence Building: Within a
P-1 District, building design and con-
struction for a multiple residence build-
ing containing more than 12 dwelling
units, and buildings accessory thereto.
shall be governed by the provisions of
Section 8.06 of this. ordinance.
14.09 Common Open Space.
1. The establishment, use, maintenance
and disposition of Common Open Space
areas within a P-1 District shall be
goverened by the provisions of Section
21 of this ordinance.
14.10 General Regulations.
1. Additional regulations in the P-1 Plan-
ned Residential Development District
are set forth in Section 19.
14.11 Boundaries of the P-1 Planned
Residential Development District. The
boundaries of the P-1 Planned Residential
Development District shall include the
following described tracts and parcels of
land:
SECTION 15. P-2 PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT.
15.01 Objectives. The P-2 Planned
Unit Development District is intended to
provide a district appropriate for high
density residential uses and office build-
ings for administrative, financial and pro-
fessional uses, particularly in transition-
al situations between business or industri-
al districts and residential districts_
It is further intended that to the extent
reasonably possible the P-2 District be
characterized by central management,
integrated architectural design of build-
ings, joint or common use of parking and
other similar facilities and a harmonious
selection and efficient distribution of
permitted uses within the district.
15.02 Permitted Uses. Within a P-2
Planned Unit Development District, no
building or land shall be used except for
the following uses:
1. Single family dwellings.
2. Two family dwellings.
3. Townhouses.
4. Multiple dwellings.
5. Administrative offices.
6. Medical, dental, legal and similar pro-
fessional offices.
7. Financial institutions.
8. Restaurants.
9. Theaters, not including "drive-in'
type.
15.03 Accessory Uses. Within a P-2
Planned Unit Development District, the
following uses shall be allowed as acces-
sory to the permitted use:
1. Subordinate uses which are clearly and
customarily accessory to the permitted
use.
15.04 Procedure for P-2 Planned Unit
Development District Zoning, Platting
and Development.
1. Zoning, Platting and Development:
a. Procedures for the zoning, platting
and development of a P-2 District shall
be governed by the provisions of Sec-
tions 14.05 to 14.07 inclusive of this ordi-
nance.
15.05 Building Design and Construc-
tion.
I. Multiple Residence Buildings: Within
a P-2 District, building design and con-
struction for multiple residence build-
ings, and buildings accessory thereto,
shall be governed by the provisions of
Section 8.06 of this ordinance.
2. Commercial Buildings: Within a P-2
District, building design and construc-
tion for all buildings other than multi-
ple residence buildings shall be gov-
erned by the provisions of Section 9.06
of this ordinance.
15.06 Land Use Intensity.
1. Commercial Buildings: With a P-2 Dis-
trict not more than 30`: of the lot area
shall be occupied by buildings.
15.07 Common Open Space.
1: The establishment, use, maintenance
and disposition of Common Open Space
areas within a P-2 District shall be
governed by the provisions of Section 21
of this ordinance.
15.08. General Regulations.
1. Additional regulation in the P-2 Plan-
ned Unit Development District are set
forth in Section 19.
15.09 Boundaries of the P-2 Planned
Unit Development District. The bounda-
ries of the P-2 Planned Unit Development
District shall include the following de-
scribed tracts and parcels of land:
SECTION 16. P-3 PLANNED COMMU-
NITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT.
16.01 Objectives. ;The P-3 Planned
Community Development District is in-
tended to provide a pre -planned develop-
ment of high density residential uses, of-
fice buildings for administrative, finan-
cial and `professional uses, and industrial
uses complying with the standards of the
P-4 Planned Industrial Development Dis-
trict. It is further intended that to the
extent reasonably possible the P-3 Dis-
trict be characterized by central manage-
ment, integrated architectural design of
buildings, joint or common use of parking
and other similar facilities and a harmo-
nious selection and efficient distribution
of permitted uses within the district.
16.02 Permitted Uses. Within a P-3
Planned Community Development Dis-
trict, no building or land shall be used
except for the following uses:
1. Multiple dwellings containing not less
than twelve (12) dwelling units.
2. Administrative offices.
3. Medical, dental, legal and similar pro-
f essional offices.
4. Financial institutions.
5. Restaurants.
6. Theaters.
7. Industrial uses complying with the
standards of the P-4 Planned Industrial
Development District.
16.03 Accessory Uses. Within a P-3
Planned Community Development Dis-
trict, the following uses shall be allowed
as accessory to the permitted use:
1. Subordinate uses which are clearly and
customarily accessory to the permitted
use.
16.04 Procedure for P-3 Planned
Community Development District Zon-
ing, Planning and Development.
1. Zoning, Platting and Development.
a. Procedures for the zoning, platting
and development of a P-3 District shall
be governed by the provisions of Sec-
tions 14.05 to 14.07 inclusive of this ordi-
nance.
16.05 Building Design and Construc-
tion.
1. Multiple Residence Buildings: Within a
P-3 District, building design and con-
struction for multiple residence build-
ings, and buildings accessory thereto,
shall be governed by Section 8.06 of this
ordinance.
2. Commercial and Industrial Buildings:
Within a P-3 District, building design
and construction for all buildings other
than multiple residence buildings shall
be governed by the provisions of Sec-
tion 9.06 of this ordinance.
16.06 Land Use Intensity.
1. Commercial and Industrial Buildings:
Within a P-3 District, not more than
30`' of the lot area shall be occupied by
buildings.
16.07 Common Open Space.
1. The establishment, use, maintenance
and disposition of Common Open Space
areas within a P-3 District shall be
governed by the provisions of Section 21
of this ordinance.
16.08 General Regulations.
1. Additional regulations in the P-3 Plan-
ned Community Development District
are set forth in Section 19.
16.09 Boundaries of the P-3 Planned
Community Development District. The
boundaries of the P-3 Planned Commu-
nity Development District shall include
the following described tracts and parcels
of land.
SECTION 17. P-4 PLANNED INDUSTRI-
AL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT.
17.01 Objectives. The P-4 Planned
Industrial Development District is in-
tended to provide a planned industrial
development district of high quality with
regulations, controls and standards for
the orderly development and mainte-
nance of permitted uses therein which
will be complementary to and compatible
with the predominantly suburban -rural
character of the Village, and which will
insure to the owners and occupants of
permitted uses the full use, benefit and
prestige of a planned industrial district of
exemplary standards in selected areas
deemed especially adapted by reason of
surroundings, transportation facilities
and other facts to such land use to enable
such a district to make a fair and continu-
ing contribution to the general welfare of
the Village and its neighboring communi-
ties.
It is further intended that to the extent
reasonably possible the P-4 District be
characterized by central management
and a harmonious selection and efficient
distribution of permitted uses within the
district.
17.02 Permitted Uses. Within a P-4
Planned Industrial District, no building or
land shall be used except for the following
uses:
1. Manufacturing, compounding, process-
ing, packaging, treatment and assem-
bly of products and materials, but ex-
cluding uses engaged principally in the
processing of used products or materi-
als and excluding the processing of
animals.
2. Research. testing and experimenta-
tion.
3. Offices.
4. Wholesaling and warehousing of non-
perishable products not manufactured
on the premises of the permitted use,
provided such products are the proper-
ty of or consigned to the owner of the
permitted use or a lessee thereof, and
provided further that the owner or les-
see of the permitted use does not estab-
lish said use as a freight terminal oper-
ation.
17.03 Accessory Uses. Within a P-4
Planned Industrial Development District,
the following uses shall be allowed as
accessory to the permitted use:
1. Subordinate uses which are clearly and
customarily accessory to the permitted
use.
2. Personnel service facilities providing
personal services, education, recrea-
tion, food and convenience goods to
only those personnel employed on the
permitted use.
3. Warehousing and outside storage of
raw materials, supplies and equipment
used on the premises of the permitted
use, and products manufactured or as-
17
sembled on said premises; provided
however, that all outside storage areas
shall not comprise an area greater than
the floor area of the principal structure
on the permitted use, and shall be en-
closed by a screen wall fence of not less
than 10 feet in height. Said screen wall
fence shall be 100` , opaque and shall be
so designed and constructed as to be
architecturally harmonious with the
principal structure. A screen planting
may be substituted for the screen wall
fence at the discretion of the Council;
provided however, that any such screen
planting shall fulfill the foregoing
height and opacity requirements
throughout each season of the year
within 24 months after date of planting.
4. Office and administrative facilities.
5. Shipping and receiving spaces and
mailing and order pick-up facilities.
17.04 Procedure for P4 Planned In-
dustrial Development District Zoning,
Planning and Development.
1. Zoning, Platting and Development.
a. Procedures for the zoning, plat-
ting and development of a P-4 District
shall be governed by the provisions of
Sections 14.05 14.07 inclusive of this
ordinance.
17.05 Building Design and Construc-
tion. Building design and construction
within a P-4 District shall be governed by
the provisions of Section 9.06 of this ordi-
nance, except as hereinafter set forth:
1. Accessory Buildings.
a. Exteriors of accessory buildings
shall" have the same exterior finish as
the principal structure.-
17.06 Performance Standards. Uses
which because of the nature of their oper-
ation are accompanied by an excess of
noise, vibration, dust, dirt, smoke, odor,
noxious gases, glare or wastes shall not
be permitted. These residual features
shall be deemed excessive when they
exceed or deviate from the performance
standards established in Section 12.07 of
this ordinance for the I-1 District, and the
performance standards and procedures of
said Section 12.07 shall be applied in every
case to uses within a P-4 District.
17.07 Common Open Space.
1. The establishment, use, maintenance
and disposition of Common Open Space
areas within a P-4 District shall be
governed by the provisions of Section 21
of this ordinance.
17.08 General Regulations.
1. Additional regulations in the P4 Plan-
ned Industrial Development District
are set forth in Section 19.
17.09 Boundaries of the P-4 Planned
Industrial Development District.
The boundaries of the P-4 Planned
Industrial Development District shall in-
clude the following described tracts and
parcels of land:
SECTION 18. F-1 FLOOD PLAIN &
WATERCOURSE DISTRICT.
18.01 Purpose. The Flood Plain &
Watercourse District is established in the
public interest to protect persons and
property from the hazards of flood water
inundation and soil erosion, and to protect
the natural resources of the Village in-
cluding the lakes, wetlands, marshes and
MINI
C��
V V0 F` fv b L Y
I� 9 F,
LAT
1. Application
2. Filing fee $100.00, escrow $150.00 per' subdivision grouping.
i
3. Property owners list from Hennepin County showing all
owners within 350 feet of subject property. i
i
4. 15.copies of the Waiver/Certificate of Survey as prepared
by a registered engineer/surveyor, including but not
limited to:
A. Overall lot area
B. Building location with setbacks noted or
building envelope
_ C. Proposed lot A or B-
_ D. Legal description for each lot
E. Square footage for each lot
F. Rights -of -way dedicated on appropriate streets
G. Lot dimensions
H. Easements
I. Separate utility services shown
J. Existing and proposed grade's
K. Drainage pattern
L. Developer name, address, telephone number
M. Scale 1:20, 1:30, 1:40 or 1:50
N. Existing & proposed sewers, watermains,
hydrants, street lights, etc.
_ O. Boundary lines of adjoining lands within
100 feet of the subject property
P. Other itens as required by Section 345:13
of the 'City Code
NOTE: THIS ITEM 1•7ILL NOT BE PROCESSED AT THE PLANNING COI-U.IISSION
UNTIL ALL OF T1IE ABOVE 1NFOMIATION 11AS BEEN PROVIDEDI
9!�m
AJ
TWO FAMILY
AWAIVER REPORT
3 11or 3E'z I nt : Y.ea 81
P.3rci..l:
IS: thir, 1iax_4c_. A connel _otV lies t' ao =
If .ol a c.. .it:quat ,tL xa f z. .? iLs
4.Y If ,not t s-nial :JL I - Am ems, 4$ oo?:CY
S. ;:is this ca parcel of r.,;-v-, d pricr try 19807
yes NO
..__
`�_ . _ .....: ntc Ct-i 1 i t•y ryLrv-- CEC b: lu . iD= a-i::N JZ'. 22
it ;t rrnsf.rl�-:e:fl, is Z�ztpar,:ty
_._i__.. . ,,.cl i ,:z `Y,e
.Fes ;to
L J :D (m (
��
U', no, and a sin-?ic: iine iias
bcen ao-: ir:;-_�d tii' , aiz .erYance
f�v
ai::i ser-vi c:xzg pravi � : o;xs i'ie
i rla? t:d• ;: r. L��-::..ri`a :ia:; a:f
LSD -,j �•
..
Covenants Coryi3;c:o:;: and
NO _
LL ��
'
7. :,+e Harty Aa.iib c�n�':racte
thz: .icj?in' c _.._ cz�_iiin,- Soz er.e
�✓
t.nur fire xatin-3s, i::r:lc:esnc
bast:-,cnts :: cs attic _-oas, as
�+
i-nui.red by the 3rook'yh 11arr.
: ise Uc,:a-t .erzt7
Yes No
P
W
LU
L�
i�
0
8. 7.ro nny v,ari.:cces nree'e87 Yes
9. if ewclliny uY]it is not construeteed, will a Conditional
Usa Pernit be uecs.>a? Yos No
10. Ccrdit10cs:>
natural watercourses from land uses in-
compatible with the interests of the pub-
lic in preserving these amenities in their
natural state for the public good. In addi-
tion to foregoing general purposes, it is
the specific intent of this ordinance to:
1. Reduce danger to persons and property
by preventing land changes which could
create conditions conducive to soil ero-
sion.
2. Encourage land uses which will not
impede the flow of flood water or cause
danger to persons or property.
3. Encourage land uses compatible with
the preservation of lakes, marshes,
wetlands and watercourses in their
natural state.
4. Protect the natural water resources by
the elimination of sources of pollution
and sedimentation.
18.02 Definitions. For the purposes of
Section 18, the terms defined herein have
the following meanings:
1. "Regional flood" means a flood which
is representative of large floods known
to have occurred in the Minnesota Riv-
er Valley and reasonably characteristic
of what can be expected to occur on an
averagefrequency.
2. "Flood plain" means the areas adjoin-
ing a watercourse which has been or
hereafter may be covered by a flood.
18.03 Permitted Uses. Within an F-1
Flood Plain & Watercourse District no
land shall be used except for the following
uses:
1. Grazing of livestock.
2. Recreation.
3. Farming and truck gardening involv-
ing cultivation of land only, and the
growing and preservation of trees and
nursery stock.
18.04 Regulations. Within an F-1 Flood
Plain & Watercourse District the follow-
ing regulations shall apply:
1. No new structures shall be erected
within an F-1 District after the effec-
tive date of this ordinance.
2. No major alteration of a structure in
existence on the effective date of this
ordinance shall be permitted within an
F-1 District after the effective date of
this ordinance. As used herein, major
alterations of .existing structures shall
not include repair and maintenance.
3. No filling, excavating, grading, dump-
ing, nor the clearing of trees or natural
vegetation shall be permitted in an F-1
District without specific written ap-
proval in the form of a permit issued by
the Council.
4. No use of land within an F-1 District
shall be permitted which unduly re-
stricts the capacity of the flood plain to
carry and discharge a regional flood.
18.05 General Regulations.
1. Additional regulations in the F-1 Flood
Plain & Watercourse District are set
forth in Section 19.
18.06 Boundaries of the F-1 Flood
Plain & Watercourse District.
The boundaries of the F-1 Flood Plain
& Watercourse District are as shown on,
that certain map entitled "Chanhassen
Flood Plain & Watercourse District
Map," dated Feb. 7, 1972, on file in the
office of the Village Clerk. Said map and
all notations, references and data shown
thereon are hereby incorporated by refer-
ence into this ordinance and shall have
the same force and effect as if fully set
forth and described herein. It shall be the
responsibility of the Zoning Administra-
tor to maintain said map, and amend-
ments thereto shall be recorded on said
map within thirty (30) days after official
publication of such amendments.
SECTION 19. GENERAL REGULA-
TIONS.
19.01 Regulations and Interpretations.
The regulations, interpretations, modifi-
cations and exceptions set forth in Section
19 shall apply to all districts unless other-
wise specified.
19.02 Signs.
1. The use and display of signs, devices
and symbols of visual communication
in all districts shall be governed by the
provisions of Chanhassen Ordinances
No. 36, 36-A and 36-B, and every provi-
sion contained in said ordinances are
hereby adopted and made a part of this
ordinance as if fully set forth herein.
19.03 Yards.
1. For the purpose of computing front,
side and rear yard dimensions, mea-
surements shall be taken from the
nearest point of the wall of the building
to the street right-of-way line, the side
lot line, or the rear lot line, respective-
ly, -subject to the following
modifications:
a. Cornices, canopies, eaves and bay
windows may extend into the required
yard a distance not exceeding 3 feet-
b. A wall, fence or hedge may occupy
part of the required yard except that no
wall or fence more than 8 feet high.
except a retaining wall, shall be con-
structed only upon the securing of a
Conditional Use Permit, and the re-
quired front yard of a corner lot shall
be unobstructed above a height of 3 feet
in a triangular area two sides of which
are the lines running along the street
lines between the street intersection
and a point 15 feet from the intersection
and the third side of which is the line
between the latter two points.
2. The required front yard of a corner lot
shall not contain any wall, fence, or
other structure, tree, shrub, or other
growth which may cause danger to
traffic on a street or public road by
obscuring the view.
19.04 Accessory Buildings.
1. An accessory building attached to the
main building shall be made structural-
ly a part of the main building and shall
comply in all respects with the require-
ments of this ordinance applicable to
the main building. An accessory build-
ing, unless attached to and made a part
of the main building shall not be closer
than 10 feet to the main building.
2. A detached accessory building shall
not be located in any required front or
side yard.
3. Within the R-3 and R-4 Residence Dis-
tricts accessory buildings shall observe
the same setback requirements estab-
lished for the multiple residence build-
ing except accessory buildings located
within the rear yard of the multiple res-
idence building may be located to with-
in 10 feet of the rear or interior side
property line_ The Council may require
common walls for accessory buildings
where common walls will eliminate
unsightly and hazardous areas.
19.05 Height.
I. Where the average slope of a lot is
greater than one (1) foot rise or fall in
seven (7) feet of horizontal distance
from the established street elevation at
the property line, one (1) story in addi-
tion to the number permitted in the dis-
trict in which the lot is situated shall be
permitted on the down -hill side of any
lot.
2. Towers, antennas, spires, penthouses,
scenery lofts, cupolas, water tanks,
similar structures and necessary me-
chanical appurtenances may be built
and used to a greater height than the
limit established for the district in
which the building is located only upon
the securing of a Conditional Use Per-
mit.
19.06 Landscaping.
1. All landscaped areas shall be main-
tained in an attractive and well kept
condition.
19.07 Swimming Pools.
1. Private swimming pools located on the
site of multiple family dwellings which
are intended for and used solely by the
occupants of multiple dewllings shall
comply with the following regulations:
a. No part of the water surface of a
swimming pool shall be less than fitty
(50) feet from any lot line.
b. No pump, filter or other apparatus
used to service a swimming pool shall
be located less than fifty (50) feet -from
any lot line.
c. The swimming pool area shall be
adequately fenced to prevent uncon-
trolled access from the street or adja-
cent property.
19.08 Automobile Service Stations.
1. No automobile service station, public
garage or gasoline distributing station
shall be located within three hundred
t300) feet of a school, church, hospital,
or other public meeting place having a
seating capacity of more than 100 per-
sons.
2. No automobile service station on a site
within three hundred (300) feet of an R-
1, R-2, R-3 or R-4 Residential District
shall be operated between the hours of
12:01 a.m. and 6:00 a.m.
19.09 Basement Homes.
1. Basement homes are prohibited in all
districts.
19.10 Moving, Alteration or Wrecking
of Structures.
1. Buildings or structures moved into or
within the village shall comply with the
provisions of this ordinance and the
Chanhassen Building Code for new
buildings or structures.
2. No person, firm, or corporation shall
erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair,
move, improve, remove, convert, or
demolish any building or structure in
the village, or cause the same to be
done, without first obtaining a separate
building permit for each such building
or structure from the Village Building
Official.
19.11 Projecting and Roof Mounted
Equipment.
1. All roof mounted equipment shall be
screened from the public view at street
level.
2. Air conditioning or heating units
projecting through exterior walls or
windows shall be so located and de-
signed that they neither unnecessarily
generate or transmit sound or disrupt
the architectural amenities of the
building. Units projecting more than 24
inches beyond the exterior finish of a
building wall shall be permitted only
with the written consent of the Village
Building Inspector.
19.12 Transmission Lines.
1. Within all districts the establishment,
construction, maintenance and use of
overhead or underground transmission
lines. conduits or pipelines for the
transporting or transmission of gas, oil.
petroleum, solids. liquids or high vol-
tage electrical energy is prohibited,
except upon the securing of a Condition-
al Use Permit.
19.13 Planned Unit Development Re-
quirements.
1. All proposed land developments and all
applications for rezoning which contain
in excess of 25 single family zoning lots.
or in excess of 24 multiple dwelling
units, or in excess of 10 acres for pro-
posed commercial or industrial use
shall be submitted as proposed planned
unit developments and shall be gov-
erned by the regulations thereof.
19.14 Unimbabitable Land.
1. Lots. parcels or tracts of land deemed
by the Council to be uninhabitable shall
not be utilized for residential use, nor
for such other uses as may endanger
life or property or the public health and
welfare or create or aggravate a flood.
erosion or water pollution hazard, but
such land within a zoning district shall
be set aside for such uses as shall not
create or contribute to any of the fore-
going conditions.
19.15 Zoning Lot Limitation.
1. Only one principal structure shall be
permitted on each zoning lot.
19.16 Outside Storage in Residential
Districts.
1. Outside storage of recreational equip-
ment is prohibited in the front and side
yards in all residential zoning districts,
unless screened by fencing.
2. All outside storage structures in resi-
dential zoning districts shall be archi-
tecturally harmonious with the princi-
palstructure.
19.17 Certificate of Occupancy.
1. The certificate of occupancy required
by the Chanhassen Building Code, Ordi-
nance No. 23, shall be issued only for a
structure which complies with all ap-
plicable provisions of this ordinance
and said building code.
SECTION 20. NON -CONFORMING
USES.
20.01 Continua ion. The lawful use of
buildings or land existing at the effective i
date of this ordinance which does not con-
form to the provisions of this ordinance
shall be discontinued within a reasonable
period of amortization of the building, and
uses of land or buildings which become
non -conforming by reason of subsequent
amendments of this ordinance shall also
be discontinued within a reasonable peri-
od of amortization of the building. Th
period of amortization shall commence
with the effective date of this ordinance
and shall extend for a period of not more
tha n :
1. Fifteen 1151 years for buildings of
wood frame construction.
2. Twenty (20) years for buildings of
wood and masonry construction.
3. Thirty (301 years for buildings of fire
proof construction.
4. Dwellings found to be non -conforming
only by reason of height, yard, or area
requirements shall be exempt from the
other continuation provisions of this
ordinance.
5. Any building or use partially taken by
public action under eminent domain
proceedings, which building or use is
thereby made non -conforming maycontinue.
20.02 Enlargement or Alteration. No
non -conforming use shall be enlarged,
altered or increased, or occupy a greater
area than that occupied by such use on the
effective date of this ordinance or any
amendment thereto. A non -conforming
use shall not be moved to any other part
of the parcel of land upon which the same
was conducted. If no structural Atera-
tions are made, a non -conforming use of a
building may be changed to another non-
conforming use of the same or more re-
stricted classification. Whenever a norl-
conforming use of a building has been
changed to a more restricted use or to a
conforming use, such use shall not there-
after be changed to a less restricted use.
. 20.03 Restoration. Any building locat-
ed in any district which is partially de-
stroyed by any cause may be restored to
its former use and physical dimensions:
provided that any such building which
does not conform to the use, height and
other restrictions of the district in which
it is located and is thus destroyed, accord-
ing to the estimate of the Council or some
official designated by it, to the extent of
fifty (50) per cent or more, may not be
rebuilt or reconstructed except in accord-
ance with such restrictions.
20.04 Termination of Use. In the event
a non -conforming use is discontinued for
a period of one i 1 i year, or if a noncon-
forming use is replaced by a conforming
use, any subsequent use of the premises
shall be in conformity with the use regula-
tions specified for the district in which
such use is located.
20.05 Junk Yards. No junk yard may
continue as a non -conforming use for
more than one 41 i year after the effective
date of this ordinance, except that a junk
yard may continue as a non -conforming
use in an I-1 District if within that period
it is completely enclosed within a build-
ing, fence, screen planting or other device
of such height, not less than eight 18) feet
n any case, so as to screen completely
the operations of the junk yard. Plans for
such building or screening device shall be
approved by the Council before it is erect-
ed or put into place.
19
20.06 Normal Maintenance. Mainte-
nance, necessary non-structural repairs,
and incidental alterations of a building or
structure containing or used as a non-
e conforming use are to be permitted pro-
vided that any such maintenance, repairs
or alteration does not extend, enlarge, or
intensify the non -conforming building or
use.
20.07 Public Utility Buildings; Excep-
tions. Municipally owned utility buildings
and structures to be used for purposes of
rendering service to the community, and
not for warehouse purposes or for the.
storage of bulky materials, when the
Council shall deem them to be clearly
necessary for the public convenience,
may be permitted in any district. Such
variation from the height and area dis-
trict regulations may be allowed for such
building or structures by the Council as it
deems necessary.
SECTION 21. COMMON OPEN SPACE.
21.01 Definition. "Common Open
Space" is a parcel or parcels of land or an
area of water, or a combination of land
and water within the site designated for a
Planned Unit Development District, and
designed and intended for the use or en-
joyment of occupants of the Planned Unit
Development District. Common open
space may contain such complementary
structures and improvements as are nec-
essary and appropriate for the benefit and
enjoyment of occupants of the Planned
Unit Development District.
21.02 Dedication of Common Open
Space. The Village may, at any time and
from time to time, accept the dedication
of land or any interest therein for public
use and maintenance, but it shall not be a
condition of the approval of a Planned
Unit Development District that land pro-
posed to be set aside for common open
space be dedicated or made available to
public use.
21.03 Non -Dedicated Common Open
Space. The ownership and maintenance of
non -dedicated common open space shall
be governed by the following regulations:
1. Ownership. The legal or beneficial
owner or owners of all of the land pro-
posed to be included in a Planned Unit
Development District shall provide for
the establishment an organization for
the ownership and maintenance of any
non -dedicated common open space, and
such organization shall not be dis-
solved, nor shall it dispose of any such
common open space, by sale or other-
wise, except to an organization con-
ceived and established to own and
maintain the common open space, with-
out first offering to dedicate the same
to the Village or other government
agency.
2. Maintenance. In the event that the
organization established to own and
maintain common open space, or any.
successor organization, shall at any
time after establishment of the Plan-
ned Unit Development District fail to
maintain the common open space in
reasonable order and condition in ac-
cordance with the Development Plan,
the Village may serve written notice
upon such organization or upon the oc-
Planning Commission -2- March 3,1978
Planner's Comments
1. The plan has been prepared to take into account the concerns ex-
pressed by the Planning Commission at the sketch plan review, i.e. as
few lots as possible abutting MTH 7; 70 foot right of way from CSAH
15 to first intersection within the development.
2. It is the intention of the developer to have at least several
double units on the proposed development. The location and type of
units will be articulated at the discussion with the Planning Commission.
It will be incumbant upon the petitioner to incorporate the recommendations
of the Planning Commission and city staff into the placement of design
of these units and indicate so in the preliminary plat.
3. The plan indicates 50 foot rights of way for the cul-de-sacs.
City standards in Ordinance 33 requires a 60 foot right of way for
cul-de-sacs.
4. The petitioner intends to use outlot "B" of the Minnewashta Creek
Addition for the purpose of a beach lot for the residents of the
proposed development. The City of Chanhassen encourages this type of
land use, however, the petitioner should indicate at this time his plans
for the zoning and development of said beach lot.
5. Presently the plans submitted are deficient with respect to plans
for the beach lot, the double units and landscaping along MTH 7.
Planner's Recommendation
I recommend that the petitioner articulate to the Planning Commission
his proposal for the double units, the beach lot, and the landscaping
along MTH 7. Before the petitioner is advised to prepare a preliminary
development plan, these issues should be delineated and resolved by
the Planning Commission and city staff. Said preliminary development
plans should be done in accordance with Section 14.05 of Zoning Ordinance
47.
:e:���111•�CR'.�:iY�>�ir.r ..LLt_: 'i1r -_ r.� u��... was'-it�d
,,-P-,!/CLOSU•�-
WILLIAM D. SCHOELL
CARLISLE MADSON
JACK T. VOSLER
JAMES R. ORR
HAROLD E. DAHLIN
LARRY L. HANSON
RAYMOND J. JACKSON
WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY
JACK E. GILL
RODNEY B. GORDON
THEODORE D. KEMNA
JOHN W. EMOND
KENNETH E. ADOLF
WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT
BRUCE C. SUNDING
- - SCHOELL & MAOSON, iNc.
ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS
(612) 938-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343
OFFICES AT HURON, SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON, TEXAS
March 1, 1978
City of Chanhassen
c/o Mr. Don Ashworth, City Manager
P. O. Box 147
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
Attention: Mr. Bruce Pankonin
U
Subject: Robert Ritter -- Sketch Plan for
Development of Outlot A of Minne-
washta Creek 1st Addition --
Our File No. 7120.
Gentlemen:
We have reviewed the revised sketch plan for the subject
development prepared by Clark Engineering Company and dated
February, 1978 and have the following comments:
1) The Highway No. 7 access has been eliminated as sug-
gested by the Planning Commission.
2) The 70 foot right-of-way provided from County Road
No. 15 to the intersection of the two major Cul-de-Saes
will make emergency access to.the interior possible in
case of utility problems.
3) The Cul-de-Sac lengths are within Ordinance Standards.
4) Sanitary sewer, water and drainage facilities should
be as described in our January 30, 1978 report. We
attach a plan showing the location of existing facili-
ties.
We recommend approval of the sketch plan.
Very truly yours,
SCHOELL & MADSON,� NC.
WJBrezinsky:bk
attachment
February 22, 1978
Robert J. Ritter
3295 Hillsboro Ave. S.
Minneapolis, Minn. 55426
City of Chanhassen
coning Administrator
Chanhassen, Minn.
Dear Sir:
The following information regarding our proposed development
of the Berkey property is being provided as per request.
The aptilicant Robert J. Ritter is a principal in a partnership
that has purchased said land on a contract for deed from Donald
and Jane Berkey.
The proposed development is to be predominantly single family
residence lots with several lots designated for construction of
double homes.
We are proposing development under the PRD and PVD zoning
ordinance. The lot sizes vary from a minimum of 12675 sq,, feet
up to a maximum of 3.5775 sq. feet. The average of all lots is
16269 square feet.
It is our desire to proceed with this development with all
possible haste. It further is our desire to be building on
said lots by mid summer.
Sincerely,
e4j�
Robert J. Ritter
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O. BOX 1479CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 3, 1978
TO: Planning Commission, Staff and Robert Ritter, 3295 Hillsboro
Ave. South, St. Louis Park, MN 55416
FROM: Bruce Pankonin, City Planner
SUBJ: Rezoning and Subdivision of Outlot A, Minnewashta Creek
Addition
PLANNING CASE: P-484
APPLICANT: Robert Ritter
Attached hereto for your consideration and review, are the following
exhibits submitted for the rezoning and subdivision of Outlot A,
Minnewashta Creek Addition.
Enclosures
1. Community Location Graphic.
2. Sketch Plan dated January, 1978.
3. City Engineer's report dated January 30, 1978
4. Building Inspector's report dated January 31, 1978.
5. Fire Marshal's report dated January 31, 1978.
6. City Planner's repot dated February 3, 1978.
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O BOX 1476CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 3, 1978
TO: Planning Commission, Staff and Robert Ritter
FROM: City Planner, Bruce Pankonin
SUBJ: Rezoning and Subdivision of Outlot A, Minnewashta Creek Addition
PLANNING CASE: P-484
APPLICANT: Robert Ritter,
Petition
As shown in enclosure 2, the applicant, Robert Ritter, is proposing
to rezone the subject 17.5+ acres to P-1, Planned Residential Development
(PRD) and subdivide the subject property into 15 single family
lots and 19 double family lots.
Background
Community Location: As shown in enclosure 1, the subject 17.5+ acres
is located in the southwest quadrant of STH 7 and County Road 15.
Minnewashta Creek, draining Lake Minnewashta to Lake Victoria, bisects
the subject property.
Existing Zoning: The subject property and environs are zoned R-1,
Single Family Residence District. Within said use district, only
single family homes and ancillary uses are permitted uses. The duplex
portion of the Ritter proposal necessitates a rezoning by the city
council.
Comprehensive Plan Proposal:
1. Land Use Plan: Pursuant to the city's adopted land use
plan, the subject property and environs are to assume a low density
(15,000 square foot minimum) residential identity.
2. Transportation:
a). STH 7: Pursuant to MnDOT, Metropolitan Council and the
City of Chanhassen, STH 7 is to function as a major arterial.
Planning Commission -2- February. 3, 1978
b). Carver County Road 15: Pursuant to the City of Chanhassen
and Carver County's transportation plan, Carver County Road 15 is to
function as a collector street. The designation of this roadway,
Carver County Road 15, will be turned back to the City of Chanhassen
for ownership and maintenance.
3. Utilities: As shown in the city engineer's report, enclosure
3, sanitary sewer trunk and water service is available to the subject
property. Said sanitary sewer and water system was sized to handle
2 z dwelling units per acre.
4. Open Space: Pursuant to the city's open space plan, no
community parks are proposed for the subject property. However, the
open space plan aludes to the preservation of creek bottoms and
associated flood plains.
5. Physiographic Analysis: Two basic landscape characteristics
are noted in the subject property. The first are upland loams and
clay loam soils and the second are poorly drained depressional soils.
a. Analysis of Upland Loams and Clay Loams: This soil group
consists of predominantly well and mildly -well drained silty and loamy
soils ranging in slopes from 0 to 12%. The following soil characteris-
tics are common in this area:
1). Seasonal high water table is usually below 5 feet.
2). Permeability is moderately rapid.
3). Bearing strength is fair.
4). Shrink -Swell potential is low to moderate.
5). Potential for frost heave action is moderate to high.
6). Limitations of specific uses:
(a) Foundations - moderate.
(b) Local Roads and Streets - moderate.
(c) Excavation - Slight to moderate.
(d) Lawns and Gardens - slight.
(e) Dwellings with basements - moderate.
Soils having slopes from 0 to 12% can and have been used
successfully for community development with a few precautionary steps.
The hazards af soil erosion, sediment deposition and cost of planning
are related to the steepness and length of slopes.
Foundations and roads are subject to structural damage due to frost
action or soil shrink -swell. Footing drains are needed in some areas
to control seepage of water into the basement. A few soils within this
area have sandy surface layers which are more droughy and difficult
to vegetate.
Planning Commissior. 1 -4- February 3, 1978
Planner's Comments
1. The applicant is at'the "sketch plan" phase of the proposed development
of 17 acres in the City of Chanhassen. The commission at this time
should restrict their comments only to the proposed development
consistency with the adopted city plan.
2. Taking the city plan into account, coupled with sound planning
principals which respect the natural landscape of the subject property,
I feel the development should be restricted to single family detached
dwelling units with local access on County Road 15 only. The applicant
could, through the PUD process, come up with a more creative plan
that would incorporate a few duplexes on the subject property. This
development could be very similar to Saratoga Lane, developed by
Hansen and Klingelhutz Construction Co.
Planner's Recommendation
I recommend the Planning Commission look with disfavor on Robert
Ritter's proposal as submitted but instruct the applicant to proceed
with a preliminary plat which would have local frontage on County
Road 15. If the applicant desires to build duplexes in the area,
hb. should proceed with the PRD rezoning petition.
C
t a
ENCL•
COMMUNITY MINNEWASHTA
CkTION
,F CREEK, S
OUTLOT AUBDZVTSZON
). Ao� -
PB •F
ARBORETUM
i • •F
—j
•F
` y---- II
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bruce Pankonin, City Planner and Planning Commission
FROM: Jerry Schlenk, Building Inspector
DATE: January 31, 1978
SUBJ: Ritter Plat
Lots should not abut Highway 7 without a sound barrier. The inter-
section of Highway 7 and whatever is bad. If there has to be
residences on Highway 7, put the single family homes along Highway
7 and put the doubles along County Road 15. That way you will
only have 15 families complaining instead of 38. How long are
the cul-de-sacs? Watermains should be looped. Where are the
neighborhood parks? The only access to the property should be
County Road 15. Lots abutting County Road 15 should be deeper
in an east -west direction.
I think the plat should be given back to the developer and have
him come up with a more workable plan.
WILLIAM D. SCHOELL
CARLISLE MADSON
JACK T. VOSLER
JAMES R. ORR
HAROLD E. DAHLIN
LARRY L. HANSON
RAYMOND J. JACKSON
WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY
JACK E. GILL
RODNEY B. GORDON
THEODORE D. KEMNA
JOHN W. EMOND
KENNETH E. ADOLF
WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT
BRUCE C. SUNDING
SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC.
ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS
7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343
OFFICES AT HURON, SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON, TEXAS
January 30, 1978
City of Chanhassen
c/o Mr. Don Ashworth, City Manager
P. O. Box 147
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
Attentions Mr. Bruce Pankonin
Subject: Robert Ritter - Proposed Development of
Outlot A of Minnewashta Creek lst Addition,
Our File No. 7120.
Gentlemen:
We have reviewed the sketch plan for the subject development as prepared by
C1ark.Engineering Company, and dated January, 1978.
GENERAL:
In late 1972, we reviewed a plan for this property which proposed 56
townhouse units with access to Highway 7, and 14 single-family units with
access to County Road 15.
The single -.family area in the plan. under consideration is similar to the
1972 plan, with one lot added. The current plan substitutes 19 double -family
lots (38 units) for the townhouse units in the 1972 plan.
ACCESS:
. In reviewing the former plan, we expressed concern about traffic entering
and leaving Highway 7 from the townhouse area. The reduction in units in this
area does not alleviate this concern and we.would prefer to -see access to the
entire development from County Road 15.
For safety purposes, the Highway 7 access would require construction at a
right.turn lane, an acceleration lane and a by-pass lane. The Highway Depart-
ment will not participate in the cost of construction of these lanes. The
estimated $29,000 total cost of this improvement would have to be borne by
the developer.
SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC.
City of Chanhassen January 30, 1978
c/o Mr. Don Ashworth, City Manager
Attention: Mr. Bruce Pankonin
Page 2
We recommend the developer give further consideration to routing all traf-
fic to County Road 15.
STREETS:
The 50 foot right-of-way widths shown are in.accordance with ordinance
standards. Improved roadway widths shall be 28 feet. Concrete curb and gutter
will be required.
Cul-de-Sac radii are shown as 50 feet compared to 60 feet required by
ordinance. However, we feel a 50 foot radius is adequate to accommodate the
40 foot improved roadway radius required and recommend approval as shown.
The Cul-de-Sac in the single-family area is 550 feet compared to 500 feet.
DRAINAGE:
Runoff from the double -family area should be directed to the marsh area
through.an interior storm sewer system.
The single-family area runoff should be intercepted by catch basins prior
to entering County Road 15 and directed to the creek to the north.
SANITARY SEWER AND WATRRt
The area will be served by connection of an interior sanitary sewer system.
with existing sanitary sewer in County Road 15 and along Highway 7. It should
be noted that the existing sanitary sewer will restrict the buildable area of
the two most southeasterly located lots.
Water service should be provided by an 8-inch watermain looped from County
Road 15 to an existing 8-inch line, 200 feet north of the property at Highway 7.
Maximum hydrant spacing should be 600 feet.
SUMMARY:
We recommend approval of the proposed sketch plan subject to our recommenda-
tions.
Very truly yours,
SCHOELL & MADSOT, INC.
WJBrezinsky:bk
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O BOX 147*CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
ME T N P MO nT TTR
i Ica u vi'x
DATE: May 3, 1978
TO: Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Assistant City Planner, Bob Waibel
SUBJ: Ritter PRD for Minnewashta Creek
APPLICANT: Robert Ritter
PLANNING CASE: P-499
Please include the attached with your copy of Exhibit 1, Ritter
PRD, Minnewashta Creek Frist Addition:
Enclosures
16. Planning Commission Minutes dated April 12, 1978.
17. Applicant's Revised Plan Proposal.
18. Applicant's Street Plan and Profiles, Sanitary Sewer, Storm
Sewer, and Water Plans and Profiles.
19. Applicant's letter dated April 25, 1978.
20. Fee Owner's letter dated April 26, 1978.
21. Engineer's Report dated May 5, 1978.
22. Planner's Report dated May 3, 1978.
Planning Commission Meeting April 12, 1978
am
,ny.legal advice which would say that -the rules that
,e are talking about with regard -to boats and snowmobiles
,nd-motor:bikes,`those-rules cannot be changed. If this
s-possible.-to do legally I would. subscribe to that. I
o not want. -to -attract people out there. We are placing
ome fairly stringent regulations in the contract so that
'hoever buys.: knows -they : cam! t run a . snowrrv�bile. They
anIt•have'a motor bike. They can't launch a boat from
the -beach -property.- They can`-t tie up a boat except
during the: daytime and it can. only be ten horses and
that's all that can ever -be! -tied up to the dock. We
are doing these- things• so as not to: be attractive to
the.people that you are.worriea-about beinging in there.
I look to, the time in the not to distant future when
Lake Riley will very likely ba-like-Lake Calhoun and
Lake Harriet, restricted to -non -motorized boats. I
-am anticipating x
d:I am,quite willing to live
with that.t Joy Setzer - Could he use o this property'by your residents be
accomplished without erecting the shelter? That's
the part -that disturbs me.more than the people using
it for canoes.
Allen, Gray _ I think the shelter gives -us -some discipline over the
property that we might not -otherwise have. If the
lance just lies fallow and it is a place for people to
run back;and-forth-to,get to -and from the water I
don't really think it will be very attractive. I think
with°an attractive shelter -there, there will be more
discipline as to how that -property is maintained.
Dick �Iatthews-moved-to.close the public hearing. Motion seconded by
Walter Thompson and -:unanimously approved. Hearing closed at 8:45 p.m.
A*-'
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT. PLAN ROBERT RITTER: Mr: Ritter was present
see ing approva to-subdivide.23.8 acres into 36 residential lots
on property located in the -southeast quadrant of -County Road 15 and
State Highway T. -He is proposing -duplexes on --six of these lots.
The Park and Recreation -Commission at -its -April 4th meeting voted
that park dedication requirements be -fulfilled in accordance with
Section 2.03 - of Ordinance- • -14A; .whereby.: the park charge is remitted
when a building permit, is issued.
3
The Planner recommended the Planning•Commission order a public hearing
to consider the -rezoning -from R-1: to P-1 and subdivision contingent
to the following grounds and conditions:
1. That the applicant -change the berm so that both rear yard
availability and highway noise abatement are accommodated.
2. That the lot lines of Lots 30 through 36 be extended across the
marsh to the northeast boundary of the property.-:---
3. That the applicant submit a plan for the public hearing that is
in accordance with-Sections-7 - 9 of Ordinance 33.- -
Mal MacAlpine moved to hold a public hearing on May 10, 1978, at 7:45
p.m. contingent upon the Planner's recommendation to consider
Planning Commissio- Meeting April-12, 1978
the preliminary- development- -plan for.'.Minnewashta Creek First
Addition. .r-lotion seconded by Hud Hollenback and unanimously approved.
' PRELIMINARY PLAT JAMES MC CLEARY: Y proposing Mr. 'McCleary is ro osing to
sundivi a acres. into: seven single family lots and one,outlot.
Mr. Cleary stated it. is his intention to sell 1/3:undividecl interest
in Outlot A to each of the off -lake lots. He does not proposed to
construct a --dock-., .The outlot has - a: good----- swimming beach.
Dick Matthews moved to hold a public hearing on May 10, 1978, at
8:30 p.m." to consider 'subdivision- and. a: -conditional use-permit.*for
Outlot A for James McCleary. •.-Motion-.seconded-.by=Hud_Hollenback--and
unanimously -approved:
SKETCH PLAN - COLONIAL GROVE SECOND -ADDITION: ?r: Bloomberg was
present to iscuss � issproposed subdivision. of 16.-4.acres:-into 30
single family. -lots' -and . one -common lot on property located -.on -the
west side of Chanhassen Road adjacent to Colonial Grove..
The Planner recommended that the, -Planning Commission encourage~the
applicant to -prepare a preliminary development plan in accordance
with Sections 7 through 9 of Ordinance,33-and the Zoning 'Ordinance.
Said plan should include a narrative statement and drawings that
describe the proposed use of the coon lot'and detailed dimensions
of the sedimentation pond --and-- the . lots -adj oining the . pond
Frank Kurvers was present and expressed concern about the drainage.
The Engineer=explained that the existing culvert under -Cheyenne'
has been blocked- and :the water from'. this - -proposed subdivision will
- ga.ther- in the .sedimentation p nd and flog through a 'storm sewer to
the north. - -s -
Mr. Bloomberg was told to oceed with prel \ri inary development- plans.
SCHNEIDER AGENCY,' 'INC . - VARIANCE' REQUEST : Charles Schneider was
present requesting a -variance to Section 3.01 of Ordinance-33
to convey by metes and bounds, 48,993 square -feet of land to the
State:: Bank-: of-: Chanhassen to : be used - for additional-. parking : anal_ . to
provide. for- additional'. drive -up lanes:-when':the need arises ":::
During the discussion on setback requirements it -was discovered that
theCity- Hall pro* erty. is incorrectly -zoned. ::,This will be- taken care
later- of . at:- a - tithe.
_ :. . �.. _... _ , ..
Hud Hollenback moved to hold a public hearing on May 10,, 1978, at
9:15 p.m. to consider.the variance requested by.the Schn 'der Agency,
.Inc. Motion seconded by-: Walter -Thompson-- and: unanimously. proved.
SUBDIVISION REQUEST -FOR -LOTS 11, 12; -13,16; --17, 18,'-5 ,' 5-5,- AND 56,
PLEASANT VIEW ADDITION: Jon Sc evenius was present requesting to
subdivide the above listed lots into four lots proposed as Tracts A,
B, C, : and •D. The proposal" is to essentia_ lly. sell the easterly most
45 feet of Lots 17'- 12, and 55 excepting the northern 140 feet of Lot 12
to the owner of "-Lots 18. and. 56 .. Lots•-"55 , - 54,-. "17 . and 16 have two water
grid sewer laterals and two water and sewer trunk units assessed.
Lo s 56-and 18 presently have one-_�sewer=and water .lateral and one
sei.7er and water trunk unit assessed. The geometry of the existing
property split.`in:-Lots 12= and 13 has -'created a substandard lot
deficient -in lot area'. The -Planner recommended --the Planning- Commission
April 25, 1978
Robert J. Ritter
3295 Hillsboro Ave. S.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426
City of Chanhassen
Planning and Zoning
Chanhassen, Minnesota
To Whom It May Concern:
Regarding the preliminary plat for Minnewashta Creek
Second Addition, the following information is being provided.
The preliminary plat proposes developing the property
under a Planned Residential Development, P-1 Zoning, with
the site being subdivided into 36 residential lots. The lots
include 30 single family residences and 6 duplex units.
The plans submitted provide for grading, catchbasins,
storm sewers etc., providing more then adequate drainage of
the area.
The plans call for installation of a city sewer and
water system connecting to the existing services available
to the property.
Street lighting, electric service, gas mains and
boulevard inprovements will be installed to comply with city
ordiance and safety provisions required by the utility
companies.
Additional information regarding this plan may be ob-
tained by contacting myself or our consulting engineers,
Clark Engineering Co.
Sincerely,
J
Robert J. "Ritter
r � h
April 26, 1978
City of Chanhassen
Planning and Zoning
Chanhassen, Minnesota
Gentlemen:
Regarding the proposed preliminary development plan
for Minnewashta Creek Second Addition.
The proposal is being submitted by Robert J. Ritter,
5295 Hillsboro Ave. S., Minneapolis, Minnesota.
The fee owner is Donald B. Berkey, 102 Colla Cita,
San Clemente, California.
I hereby content to the filing of the preliminary
plat of Minnewashta Creek Second Addition by Mr. Ritter.
Donald b. Ber ey
f 7
ate
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7610 LAREDO DRIVE*P.O. BOX 147aCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Planning Commission, Staff and Robert Ritter, 3295 Hillsboro
Ave. South, St. Louis Park, MN 55426
FROM: Assistant City Planner, Bob Waibel
DATE: May 3, 1978
SUBJ: Ritter PRD for Minnewashta Creek First Addition, Public Hearing
APPLICANT : Robert Ritter
PLANNING CASE: P-499
Pet i i-i nn
The petition before the Planning Commission is a public hearing to
consider the rezoning and subdivision of that part of Minnewashta
Creek First Addition which is referred to in enclosures 1-21.
Planner's Comments
1. Enclosures 17 and 18, as submitted by the applicant, do include the
contingencies setforth by the Planning Commission at its April 12, 1978
meeting. Specifically, the applicant has furnished the following:
a). Plans showing extension of the property lines of lots
30 through 36, and realignment of the berm proposed through lots 15
and 16 as requested.
b). Plans in accordance with sections 7 and 8 of Subdivision
Ordinance 33, with the exception of the street sections. Since the
meeting of April 12, 1978, it was determined that the requirements
of section 9 were not applicable at this time.
Planner's Recommendation
I recommend that the Planning Commission look with favor upon the proposed
development contingent that any additional conditions as found
necessary by the Planning Commission and staff be included in the
materials to be reviewed by the city council.
�q9
CITY OF CHANHASSEN `
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE OF HEARING
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF CARVER )
Don Ashworth , being first duly sworn, on oath deposes
and says that he is and was on April 25 19 78 the duly qualified and
acting City Clerk -Administrator of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said
date he caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of hearing on a
proposed rezoning and subdivision of land .for Robert Ritter., inthe
Chanhassen, Minnesota
City to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A" , by enclosing a copy of said
notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes
addressed to all such owners in the United States mails with postage fully prepaid
thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such
by the records of the County Treasurer of Carver County, Minnesota, and by other
appropriate records.
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this �_ day of ,
Nota ublic
Don Ashworth
City Manager
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON
PROPOSED REZONING AND SUBDIVISION OF LAND FOR
ROBERT RITTER, CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That the Planning Commission of the City
of Chanhassen, Minnesota will meet on Wednesday, the loth day of May,
1978 at 7:45 p.m. at the City Hall, 7610 Laredo Drive, Chanhassen,
Minnesota, for the purpose of holding a public hearing to consider
rezoning the following described trail of land from R-lA, Single Family
Residential District to P-1, Planned Residential Development District,
and subdivide the following described property into 36 residential lots.
The proposed rezoning and subdivision of land involves the following
described parcel of land:
"Outlot A, Minnewashta Creek First Addition."
A plan showing siad proposed rezoning and subdivision is available
for inspection at the city hall.
All persons interested may appear and be heard at said time and
place.
Dated: April 24, 1978 BY ORDER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Bruce Pankonin, City Planner
Publish in the Carver County Herald on April 26, 1978.
CITY "OF
CHANHASSEN
7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O. BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 6, 1978
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Assistant City Planner, Bob Waibel
SUBJ: Ritter P.R.D. for Minnewashta Creek
APPLICANT: Robert Ritter
PLANNING CASE: P-499
Please include the attached with your copy of Exhibit 1,
Ritter P.R.D. Minnewashta Creek First Addition.
Enclosures:
8. Planning Commission Minutes
9. Planner's Report dated April 5, 1978
10. Engineer's Report dated April 5, 1978
11. Applicant's Preliminary Development Plan
12. Applicant's letter of intent dated March 29, 1978
13. Applicant's Contract for Deed notorized January 6, 1978.
14. Memo to Park and Recreation Committee dated March 21, 1978
15. Park and Recreation Committee Minutes dated April 4, 1978
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O. BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
PLANNING REPORT
DATE: April 6, 1978
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Assistant City Planner, Bob Waibel
SUBJ: Ritter P.R.D. Minnewashta Creek
APPLICANT: Robert Ritter
PLANNING CASE: P-499
Reference: City Ordinance 47, Section 24(Rezoning Proposal) and
Section 14 (Planned Unit Development Proposal).
Petition:
As shown in enclosures 1-13, Robert Ritter is proposing to rezone
approximately 23.8 acres of the Minnewashta Creek lst Addition
from R-1 to P-1, and subdivide the subject property into 36
residential building sites. Consideration of the applicant's
request will require separate action or the rezoning and preliminary
development plan petition.
Planner's Comments:
1. Since the March 8, 1978 Planning Commission review of this
proposal, the applicant has informed me that he intends to build
six double residential units on lots 15, 16', 17, 27, 28 and 29..
Renderings of the double units to be built are enclosed with this -
report.
2. As per the plan submitted, there is sufficient buildable area
for a double unit on lot 15, however, careful attention should be
exercised due to the restrictions presented by the trunk sewer
transversing the property and the setback requirement of city
ordinance.
3. The Park and Recreation Committee at its April 4, 1978 meeting,
voted that park dedication requirements be fulfilled in accordance
with -Section 2.03 of Ordinance 14A, whereby the park charge Is
remitted at the issue of each building permit.
PLANNING REPORT -2- April 6, 1978
4. The berm indicated on lots 15 and 16 will greatly reduce or
eliminate the rear yard of structures to be placed there.
5. The lot lines of lots 30 through 36 should.be extended to the
northeast boundary of the P.R.D. in order to insure the marsh is
maintained. The marsh will continue to be subject to the wetland
regulations of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District.
6. As stated in enclosure 12, the applicant intends to construct
a beach house on the beach lot after 19 building permits have been
issued to the P.R.D.. At this time I advise the applicant that any
change of status of the beach property will require a conditional
use permit.
Planner's Recommendation:
I recommend that the Planning Commission order a public hearing to
consider the rezoning and subdivision request to be held May 10, 1978
contingent to the following grounds and conditions;
1. That the applicant change the berm so that both rear yard
availability and highway noise abatement are accommodated.
2. That the lot lines of lots 30 through 36 be extended across
the marsh to the northeast boundary of the subject property.
3. That the applicant submit a plan for the public hearing that is
in accordance with Sections 7 - 9 of Subdivision Ordinance 33.
Planning Commissi Meeting March 8, 1978'-.,! -15-
May and -start -building immediately. This Would chive
7a four month lead time to get into -our --manufacturing,
with-another`month'lead time..to get -into our o-T.ice
facility., We would appreciate anything you can do
t6-enhance that time. It is my•understanding that
water`could'come into the property -by the time we
gill. need the -water. -Sewer would'not be present or
a-\railable for our site until the' su =,,.,r of 1979 which
woul,! then cause us to'have-•to go for a variance
- to -,Ordinance- 45: All -.that `haVinq to take 'place prior
to our building permit.
Les Bridger moved that we; as a Planning�Coi�ission, encourage Animal
Fair to continue'with'the necessary -processes -through the city to
continue this development and`we'=look'favorably 'as a commission on
the design- and :land .use*."- ---Motion'- seconded by Jerry Neher. The following
voted -in-favor: * Les .8r.idger, �Romat�-Roos ; --Dick-'Matthews, and Jerry
Neher. Hud Hollenback voted no. Motion:carried.
Hud Hollenback•'-,T`think the.Planner's comments would be apropos
in the motion.' ! .'think'- -,it-,. woul& rhinge on the city `s
_ -�r-cooperation'on :the. intra"'face 'on- the sewer etc.
ROY TEICH,' PROPERTY SPLIT: Mr. Teich wants to'sell off five'acres
by metes and bounds- escription' to-a`neighbor...*.The property abuts
Lakota Lane -.and, -Highway-101._: ,The Planner 'recommeAded approval
conditioned upon no building"permits`be issued-for'residential
purposes until sewer::is•available..
Hud Hollenback moved to recommend"approval of the -'land transfer
provided no `building permits * be issued. -for -- residential pu' oses until
sewer is available. Motion seconded by Dick Matthews and nanimously
approved : - . -.... _ _. ..:. :.... .. .. ' .: .
MINNEWASRTA CREEK`FIRST-ADDITION: :-Bob Ritter was present requesting
approval to divide_ : property_- into - 36 residential -= lots,. and two- outlots .
The property is located on.Minnewashta Parkway -_and Highway-7: .-Sanitary
sewer and water are available to the property. The plan indicates
50 ' feet of - right-of-way for the `cul-de=sacs: `: City standards -call'
for 60 feet of right-of-way: 'The -petitioner intends to use Outlot B
for the purpose of a beach lot for the residents of the development.
Plans for, the ` b"each` lot. = have `not ` been submitted .
Bill Brezinsky _gave -=his --report:.' This plan eliminates the'curb cut
onto Highway 7. The cul-de-sac lengths are within ordinance
standards. The drainage for the entire area will go to the creek
on --the north: -part of -the property: =
Bob Ritter-' 7 We 'would -like approximately 8 lots with double units.
These are the lot numbers that I would like to have:
zoned as doubles: 27, 30, 31, 32,-34, 36, 14,-and 15.
We are"flexible on that. Those lots along the marsh
could be'extended'iiito-the marsh-. :If the city wants
= toy keep: the marsh: as: large as possible, fine, if you
want us to run`_the,:lot pines all the way to the back,
we can do that too. It would never--be'built'on and
that'would'be in some type'of a covenant the fact
that that part•'of�the-land would never be disturbed.
Planning Commission Meeting March .8 -1978 -16-
The City Planner'felt'-the -lot lines :could '•be:_extended to the rear
property line as -there are no plans -fora public park in this area.
The Park and .Recreation- Commission .will -.look at --the plan and make comme+ s
Members commented —on —the placemeht=of the.duplexes.
Roman -Roos - I have!no real problems where you -place the doubles
other than -along Highway"7. '2-,think-doubles are the
coming -:thing As,far as the placement along the
- amenity : area or - interspersed, : " I.-- like -the idea of
interspersing"them myself. -
Jerry-Neher I'think-the-plan:is a vast --improvement over what
we first looked' -at.-: As-far--as-:-doubl.es are concerned
I have no problem with them or where he puts.them.
Hud Hollenback._- I•.think we-ought:'to give -some -consideration to -the
..•beach access-and-hopefully'have-:those'part of
the-.dovenants..'I-would like -to -:see a'little-.
better'mixture of -:the::duplexes= .than � having :them
all on - one--• street -or the .majority of them -on
one' -street.'_
Les Bridger - I would like to see the doubles a little more scattered
about .the -plan Conceptually : I_ like the idea 'of them
having the availability of more'of:-.the amenities in
the area:'I--would-.really like -to. -see them scattered
- ---about: more •than-- having 'a row of .duplexes.
Dick -Matthews- i would: -like to_': see them on ::the ''largest lots : I
.wouldn't particularly'care=where they are located
just -so -.that they were.plac-ed.because-a double is
going to be - at - least- half ' again .• as big as `single
family dwelling,,Irwould guess :.
The developer was. instructed -to -proceed -to preliminary-j /ndmake application for a conditional use.permit for the --beat-. -
C.
ALLEN GRAY BEACH LOT: John Kosmas and Allen Gray were prent:to
discuss a proposed private beach lot to be used by residents of
Sunny Slope -.Addition on'.Riley-,Lake.' The�'=lot• is 50,.,feet wide, and"'
will have a parking:area and a structure i7hich would:include.a-wet
bar, changing' area • and --view of -- the - lake .
It was agreed to elim te.:the parking area•and move the building
closer to the road:, \'
Dick Matthews moved ,to-: hold -.a --public- hearing on April 12, . 1978, at
7:45 p.m. to consider the issuance of a conditional use permit for
a beach lot: Motion=_seconded by.Hud-Hollenback and unanimously"
approved . _
VALHALLA STREET VACATION: The city-hasreceived a petition to vacate
Valhalla in the Pleasant View/Horseshoe Curve area. This short street
ends.at-LotusLake.- The City'Planner cautioned that the city should
protect its drainage and sewer rights in the area. -Wilfred Goran and
Jim O'Brien were'present.
Members commented on:the proposed street vacation.
Les Bridger -'I see no problems with it as long as we abide by the
Planner's recommendations that -the city's easements
.--be taken into consideration.
Jerry Neher'-'I have no problem:
Hud Hollenback - It's not being used by anybody for launching boats?
.Is it a public access?
f
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7610 LAREDO DRIVE*P.O BOX 1479CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 21, 1978
TO: Park and Recreation Committee
FROM: Assistant City Planner, Bob Waibel
SUBJ: Park Dedication for Proposed Development, Minnewashta Creek
First Addition
PLANNING CASE: P-499
APPLICANT: Robert Ritter
This memo is to notify your committee of an upcoming decision concerning
park dedication for a proposed planned residential development on
Minnewashta Creek First Addition. (Ref. Encl. 1). I have been asked
by Mr. Ritter to assess what requirements the City of Chanhassen
will be asking for with regard to park dedication for the proposed
development. Additionally, Mr. Ritter has asked to ascertain how the
City of Chanhassen views the donation of part of the development
adjacent to, and along Minnewashta Creek for part of the requirements
of the park dedication ordinance (ref. encl. 2).
The area that has been suggested for park dedication is approximately
2 acres in the northeast corner of the proposed development, between
CSAH 15 and Highway 7. The Carver Soil Survey 1968, shows this area
to consist of Glencoe soils and moderately shallow peat and muck
over loam.
The Comprehensive City Plan does not mention the use of this land for
trailway or parkland. Although the City of Chanhassen has, as of yet,
no classificiation standards for parks, national standards suggest
that city owned parks be a minimum of 10 acres in size.
Based on the following reasons, it will be my recommendation to the
Planning Commission that said 2 acres not be accepted in lieu of the
neighborhood park charge and that park dedication measures be carried
out pursuant to Section 2.03 of Ordinance 14-A.
1). That the compehensive plan has no consideration of this land
as either parkland or trailway.
2). That due to soil conditions and land patterns, the subject
parcel is not intrinsically suited for satisfactory amounts of active play
areas.
r
Park and Recreation ommission -2- March .22, 1978
Please consider this item at your April 4, 1978 meeting and provide
any input you may have concerning this development.
11 �IAZIOI(111
Park and Recreation Commission Minutes -ige 2 April 4, 1978
rley Chellis made a motion that the Park and Recreation Commis on
des nate Western Hills Park as the Arbor Day planting area. Ph is
Pope seconded the motion. Motion passed. j
The Commis's-kon discussed the merits of vacating Valhalla Street where it
terminates o"he shore of Lotus Lake. The shore land oI a lake is a
value to the co unity. A recent meeting of the Metropolitan Council
Open Space Commit e had specific concerns about the.lack and loss of
public lands for fis A g in the metro area. Energy shortage is going to
effect the distance and lie number of occasions a person will make long
trips up north and the res t Vd-11 be increasecr fishing pressure in the
metro area. Another factor w_ich was expressed was the increasing num-
bers of retired people who will be taking advantage of water based rec-
reation on fixed incomes. The sentliiten` was so intent that the Open
Space Committee recommended to the ul-I Council that fishing docks be
funded by the Special Use Catagory of Co cil. Additionally, lake shore
will appreciate in value. -Pat Boyle made a otion that the City of
Chanhassen retain owner ip of Valhalla Street d take necessary steps
to make certain t�.'and is not misused Shirle hellis seconded the
motion. Motion carried.
Pat Boyle would like to be notified when the above issue wiil be presented
for council consideration.
Bob Waibel reviewed the Ritter Addition with the Park and Recreation
Commission. Shirley Chellis voiced concern at the lack of active space
1 in the north and west area of the city. Shirley asked where the closest
park was and he replied Leach'_-s Resort on Lake Minnewashta. Pat Boyle
made a motion that the Park.and Recreation Commission not accept Mr.
Ritter's generous offer to donate land to the city and she recommended tha
the Park and Recreation Commission endorse the Planning Commission
recommendation to abide by ordinance 14-A and contribute cash in lieu
of property. Walter Coudron seconded the motion. Motion carried.
b Waibel reviewed Colonial Grove Addition with -the Park rd Recreation
Co_,iu?i.�;sion. After much discussion, Shirley Chellis mad_, amotion that
the Pa and Recreation Commission recommend that ordinance 14-A
be applie nd further request.a donation of cash in' lieu of land by
the developer. Phyllis Pope seconded by motion,,- Motion carried.
Bob Waibel discussed the Kellynne Development.
y
Shirley Chellis made a mo 'on that Mr,, Callahan and Mr. Waibel review
the north and west side of e Minnewashta and look for a possible
park site. Denis Stedman secorideA'the motion. Motion carried.
Park Committees:
1. Western Hills - Phyllis Pope and Pat Boyle.
2. Carver Beach - Phrilis Pope.
3. Lotus Lake - W4.1ter Coudron.
4. Trails - Mary Muehlhausen.
5. Athletic Fields -,Denis Stedman
6. Lake Anna- Pat Boyle
7. Chanhassen Estates - Joe Betz
8. Minnewashta - Shriley Chellis.
I
March 29, 1978
Robert J. Ritter
3295 Hillsboro Ave. S.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426
City of Chanhassen
Planning and Zoning
Chanhassen, Minnesota
Dear Sir,
Regarding the schedule of our proposed development of
Minnewashta Greek Addition, we anticipate the following:
1. btility construction to begin in late July 1978 and
completed by fall.
2. A model home will be constructed by Sunrise Homes Inc.
at the time a building permit is available.
3. About 24 lots will be put up for sale and generally
will be sold to builders in groups.
4. We hope that weather and conditions permit installations
of curb gutters and asphalt roadway in late fall of 1978.
5. It is further intended to have all lots sold or built
on by the end of 1980.
6. At the time that building permits have been taken out
on nineteen sites we will construct a beach house
facility on outlot B for the use of residents in
Minnewashta Creek Addition.
10
WILLIAM D. SCHOELL
CARLISLE MADSON
JACK T. VOSLER
JAMES R. ORR
HAROLD E. DAHLIN
LARRY L. HANSON
RAYMOND J. JACKSON
WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY
JACK E. GILL
RODNEY B. GORDON
THEODORE D. KEMNA
JOHN W.EMOND
KENNETH E. ADOLF
WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT'
BRUCE C. SUNDING
Y�
SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC.
PENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS
(6121 938-7601 . 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH . HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343
OFFICES AT HURON, SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON, TEXAS
April 6, 1978
City of Chanhassen
c/o Mr. Don Ashworth, Administrator
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
Subject: Review of Preliminary Plat of
Outlot A, Minnewashta Creek
Subdivision as proposed by
Robert Ritter. Our File No. 7120
Gentlemen:
We have reviewed the subject preliminary plat prepared by
Clark Engineering Co. and have the following comments:
1. A 2-inch watermain shown serving four lots in the .
southeasterly cul-de-sac should be changed to 6-inch
diameter. The hydrant could be moved from Lot 9 to
the cul-de-sac without affecting fire protection.
This change can be accomplished with.little extra
construction cost.
2. The hydrants located in the center of Lots 18 and
35 should be moved to the property lines (between
Lots 18 and 19 and between Lots 35 and 36).
3. Consideration should be given to extending the cul-
verts between Lots 34 and 35 and Lots 30 and 31
toward the back of the lots.
4. The typical street section (not shown) will be 28
feet wide, 7-ton capacity with concrete curb and
gutter.
5. A second catch basin will be required on the south-
westerly cul-de-sac.
We recommend approval of the preliminary plat with conditions
outlined above.
Very truly yours,
SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.
'VUBrezinsky:sg
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7610 LAREDO DRIVE*P 0 BOX 147oCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 3, 1978
TO: Planning Commission, Staff and Robert Ritter, 3295 Hillsboro
Ave. South, St. Louis, Park, MN
FROM: Assistant City Planner, Bob Waibel
SUBJ: PRD Proposal for Minnewashta Creek First Addition
PLANNING CASE: P-499
Attached hereto for your consideration and review are the documents
submitted for the subject proposal:
1. Planner's Report dated March 3, 1978.
2. Community Location Graphic.
3. Sketch Plan dated February, 1978.
4. Building Drawings.
5. Engineer's Report dated March 1, 1978.
6. Engineer's Utility Graphic.
7. Petitioner's Letter dated February 22, 1978.
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7610 LAREDO DRIVE*P.O. BOX 1479CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
PLANNING REPORT
DATE: March 3, 1978
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Assistant City Planner, Bob Waibel
SUBJ: Rezoning, Subdivision and Proposed Preliminary Plat Review for
Minnewashta Creek First Addition.
PLANNING CASE: P-499
PETITIONER: Robert Ritter
PPi--i i-i nn
Mr. Ritter is proposing to subdivide Minnewashta Creek into 36
residential building sites and two outlots. This proposal entails the
subdivision of the subject property and rezoning from R-1 to P-1,
Planned Residential District.
Background
1. Community Location: As shown in enclosure 1, the subject property
is located between MTH 7 and County Road 15, approximately 1,000 feet
south of the intersection of MTH 7 and County Road 15.
2. Existing Zoning: The subject property and its environs are presently
zoned R-1, Single Family Residence District.
3. Utilities: Municipal water and sanitary sewer service are available
to the subject property. Presently there is a $6,201.14 area assessment
on the subject property. If the property is developed, the city engineer
will determine further assessments.
4. Comprehensive Plan Proposal:
a. Land Use: Pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan, the subject
property is to assume and maintain a low density single family residential
identity.
b. Transportation: Pursuant to the adopted Transportation Plan,
Minnewashta Parkway (CSAH 15) to which the subject property will egress,
is to function as a minor collector.
�qq
RUSSELL H. LARSON
CRAIG M. MERTZ
OF COUNSEL
HARVEY E. SKAAR
MARK C. McCULLOUGH
Mr. Bob Waibel
City of Chanhassen
Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Dear Bob:
LARSON & MERTZ
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
March 21, 1979
TELEPHONE
(612) 335-9565
Re: Minnewashta Creek 2nd Addition
I have had several telephone conferences with Mr. Ritter, who has
advised me that his interest in the above named plat has been
assigned to Romarco Development, Inc., which is owned by Mr. Ritter
and his partner. Enclosed you will find my revised development
contract, which incorporates the change in developing entity and
several other changes which were negotiated with Mr. Ritter.
The changes are as follows:
Paragraph 9: The amount of the escrow deposit has been left blank.
Romarco has let a contract for the construction of the public
improvements. Mr. Brezinsky will supply you with the amount of the
escrow deposit which should be required.
Paragraph 18: occupancy Permits can be issued upon completion of
sewer and water service to the structure. The permit previously
provided that an occupancy permit could not be issued until the
base course of the street had been completed. Mr. Schlenk has
recommended this change.
Paragraph 20A(IV): The provision for footing drains has been made
uniform with the similar provision found in the B T Land Company
development contract and the New Horizons development contract.
Paragraph 20G: The procedure for obtaining an alteration permit
has been described in greater detail.
You should make appropriate entries in your tickler system to insure
that the City acquires the easement required by 115C (watermain easement
across Lots 6 and 7, Block 1, Pleasant Acres), and also that the
developers convey the improvements to the City in accordance with
1117. 1LAN
PAAR1979
vJLLAC;jt
�HaNHq,g�t�(Yr
MINN,
�J
Bob Waibel -2- 3/20/79
Minnewashta 2nd
You should review the final plat to verify that it includes perpetual
storm water easements which have been approved by the City Engineer
in accordance with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District letter
dated August 21, 1978.
At this time, you should ask the applicants to provide this office
with proof of title. Any recent title opinion from the applicants'
attorney, stating that the owners are the Berkeyes and Romarco
would be satisfactory for our purposes.
Jy truly yours,
- -" e'-5-
CRAIG M. MERTZ
Assistant City Attorney
CMM:mep_
Encl.
cc: Mr. Ritter
3/19/79 Draft
_N
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
MINNEWASHTA CREEK SECOND ADDITION
DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
WHEREAS, application has been made by Donald B. Berkey and
Jane L. Berkey as the fee owners of a tract of land lying within the
City of Chanhassen and more particularly described on Exhibit A attached
hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter "subject property"); and by
Ritter & Welter, a general partnership consisting of Robert J. Ritter and
Mark M. Welter as contract purchasers and the developers of a residential
neighborhood to be developed upon the above described tract of land; and
WHEREAS, Ritter & Welter has terminated its status as contract purchaser
and has assigned its interest in said application to Romarco Development,
Inc., a Minnesota corporation, which corporation now holds a contract
vendee's interest in the subject property; and
WHEREAS, said Romarco Development, Inc. has advised the City of Chanhassen
that it wishes to be substituted for Ritter & Welter and proceed with the
subdivision of the subject property on its own behalf (said Romarco
Development, Inc. and Donald B. Berkey and Jane L. Berkey are referred
to collectively hereinafter as "the applicants"); and
WHEREAS, the subject property is presently zoned R-1, Single Family
Residence District; and
WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application under the City Zoning
Ordinance for City Council approval of a Planned Residential Development
District encompassing all of the subject property; said district and
plat to contain approximately 18 acres divided into 36 lots in one block
and to be known as Minnewashta Creek Second Addition; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Chanhassen Planning Commission
on May 10, 1978, to consider public comment on said development plan
and plat; and
WHEREAS, the Chanhassen City Council, by its resolution dated June 5,
1978, has approved the development plan and preliminary plat of the
Applicants, subject to and on condition that the Applicants enter into
this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City has established a policy requiring land developers to
furnish surfaced streets, curbs, gutters, boulevard sodding, driveways,
storm and surface water drainage facilities, street signs and lighting,
municipal water and sanitary sewer facilities and underground electric
and underground telephone service lines to all lots in plats approved
by the City, all of the foregoing hereinafter sometimes referred to as
improvements; and
WHEREAS, the applicants have made application to the City to be allowed at
Applicants' expense to construct, install and perform all work and furnish
all materials in connection with the installation of the following improve-
ments:
a. Street grading, stabilizing, and bituminous surfacing;
b. Surmountable concrete curbs and gutters;
C. Sanitary sewer mains;
d. Water mains;
e. Storm and surface water drainage;
-1-
f. Street signs;
g. Boulevard sodding;
h. Driveway surfacing;
i. Underground utility lines; and
j. Street lighting.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises
and acceptance by the City of the development plan of Minnewashta
Creek Second Addition, the City and the Applicants agree as follows:
1. Improvements by Applicants. Applicants agree at their
expense to construct, install and perform all work and furnish all
materials and equipment in connection with the installation of the
following improvements:
a. Street grading, stabilizing
b. Surmountable concrete curbs
c. Sanitary sewer mains;
d. Water mains;
e. Storm and surface water drainage;
f. Street signs;
g. Boulevard sodding;
h. Driveway surfacing;
i. Underground utility lines; and
j. Street lighting.
and bituminous surfacing;
and gutters;
2. Standards of Construction. Applicants agree that all
of the foregoing improvements shall equal or exceed City standards,
shall be constructed and installed in accordance with engineering
plans and specifications approved by the City engineers and the
requirements of applicable City ordinances and standards., and that
all of said work shall be subject to the supervision of the City
engineers.
3. Materials and Labor. All of the materials to be
employed in the making of said improvements and all of the work
performed in connection therewith shall be of uniformly good and
workmanlike quality, shall equal or exceed City standards and
specifications, and shall be subject to the inspection and approval
of the City. In case any material or labor supplied shall be .
rejected by the City as defective or unsuitable, then such rejected
material shall be removed and replaced with approved material,
and rejected labor shall be done anew to the satisfaction and
approval of the City at the cost and expense of Applicants.
4. Schedule of Work. The Applicants shall submit a
written schedule indicating the proposed progress schedule and order
of completion of work covered by this contract, which schedule
shall be a part of this contract. Upon receipt of written notice
from the Applicants of the existence of causes over which the
Applicants have no control which will delay the completion of the
work, the City, in its discretion, may extend the dates herein-
after specified for completion.
-2-
5. Roads, Sanita
Sewer, Water, and Storm Sewer Facilities.
a. Plans and Specifications. The Applicants agree to
cause their engineers to prepare all plans and specifications neces-
sary for the installation of roads, curb, gutter, sanitary sewer,
water and storm sewer facilities, including a final grading plan
in and for said plat, said plans and specifications to be in sub-
stantial accord with the proposed plans thereof prepared by Clark
Engineering Co., and dated April 26, 1978, with the following modi-
fications:
All watermains must have a minimum cover
of seven feet. All plans and specifications
shall be subject to the final approval of
the City Engineers.
b. As -Built Plan. Upon completion of construction,
Applicants shall cause their engineers to prepare and file with the
City an "as built" plan showing the installation of the foregoing
facilities within the plat.
c. Easements. Applicants, at their expense, shall
acquire all easements from abutting property owners necessary to
the installation of the sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water
facilities within the plat, and thereafter promptly assign said
easements to the City.
6. Reimbursement of Costs. The Applicants shall reim-
burse the City for all costs, including reasonable engineering,
legal, planning and administrative expenses incurred by the City
in connection with all matters relating to the administration and
enforcement of the within agreement and the performance thereby
by the Applicants.
7. Disclaimer by City. It is understood and agreed that
the City, the City Council, and the agents and employees of the
City shall not be personally liable or responsible in any manner to
the Applicants, the Applicants' contractors or sub-constractors,
materialmen, laborers, or to any other person, .firm or corporation
whomsoever, for any debt, claim, demand, damages, actions or causes
of action of any kind or character arising out of or by reason of
the execution of this agreement or the performance and completion of
the work and improvements hereunder; and that the Applicants will
save the City, the City Council, and the agents and employees of
the City harmless from any and all claims, damages, demands, actions
or causes of action arising therefrom and the costs, disbursements,
and expenses of defending the same.
8. Written Work Orders. The Applicants shall do no work
nor furnish materials not covered by the plans and specifications
for which reimbursement is expected from the City unless a written
order for such work or materials is received from the City. Any
-3-
such work or materials which may be done or furnished by the Applicants
without such written order first being given shall be at their own
risk, cost and expense, and Applicants hereby agree that without
such written order, Applicants will make no claim for compensation
for work or materials so done or furnished.
9. Performance Bond. For the purpose of assuring to the
City that the improvements to be by the Applicants constructed,
installed and furnished as set forth in Paragraph 1 hereof shall
be constructed, installed and furnished according to the terms of
this agreement, and that the Applicants shall pay all claims for
work done and materials and supplies furnished for the performance
of this agreement, Applicants agree to furnish to the City either
a cash deposit, a corporate surety bond approved by the City and
naming the City as obligee thereunder, or an irrevocable letter of
credit approved by the City in the following amount, which is
equal to 110 percent of the total cost of the improvements as
estimated by Schoell & Madson, Inc., the City Engineers, as
follows:
Total Estimated Cost:
Escrow Deposit - 110%:
10. Boulevards and Driveways. The Applicants agree to
furnish, construct and install, at Applicants' sole expense, the
following improvements for the benefit of each lot within the plat:
a. Boulevard sod, which shall be of uniformly good
quality.
b. Driveway surfacing within the public street right-
of-way, the materials and installation of which
shall be approved by the City Engineers.
For the purpose of assuring to the City that the improvements
required by this Paragraph 10 shall be constructed and installed
according to the requirements of this agreement, Applicants, or their
assigns, agree to deposit the sum of $ per lot with the
City at the time application is made for a ui ding permit for each
lot. Said deposit shall be returned to the Applicants or their
assigns upon approval of the installations by the City.
11. Erosion Control. Applicants, at their expense, shall
provide temporary dams, earthwork or such other devices and practices,
including seeding of graded areas, as shall be needed, in the judg-
ment of the City Engineers, to prevent the washing, flooding, sedi-
mentation and erosion of lands and roads within and outside the
plat during all phases of construction, including construction on
individual lots. Applicants shall keep all streets free of all dirt
and debris resulting from construction by the Applicants, their
agents or assignees upon the lands described in Exhibit A hereto.
12. Access. Reasonable access, including temporary
grading and graveling, shall be provided to all occupied residences
ION
3/19/79 Draft
in the plat until the streets are accepted by the City.
13. Street Lighting. The expense of furnishing electrical
energy for street lighting purposes shall be assumed by the City
months after the completion of installation of.the street lighting
system, or after of the building lots have been improved by the
construction of residences thereon, whichever is first to occur.
14. Replacement of Defective Work. All work and materials
performed and furnished hereunder by the Applicants, their agents and
subcontractors, found by the City to be defective within one year
after acceptance by the City, shall be replaced by Applicants at
Applicants' sole expense.
15. Liability Insurance. The Applicants shall take out
and maintain, so long as the Applicants' obligations under Paragraph
14 above continue, public liability and property damage insurance
covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property
damage which may arise out of the Applicants' work or the work of its
subcontractors, or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of
them. Limits for bodily injury or death shall be not less than
$100,000 for one person and $300,000 for each accident; limits for
property damage shall be not less than $100,000 for each accident.
The City shall be named as co-insured on said policy and the Appli-
cants shall file a copy of the insurance coverage with the City.
16. Water and Sewer Revenues. All water and sanitary sewer
service charges shall at all times be billed by the City and all
revenues derived therefrom shall be the sole property of the City.
17. Conveyance of Improvements. Upon completion of the
installation by Applicants of the improvements set forth in Paragraph 1
hereof in accordance with the plans and specifications hereunder and
the written approval by the City, the Applicants shall convey said
improvements to the City free of all liens and encumbrances and with
warranty of title. Should the Applicants fail to so convey said
improvements, the same shall become the property of the City without
further notice or action on the part of either party hereto, other
than acceptance by the City.
18. Building Permits. Upon completion of the grading and
placement of rock stabilizing materials for road construction within
said plats, the City Building Inspector, upon the approval of the
City Manager, shall be authorized to issue building permits for resi-
dential construction within said plats upon payment of all fees and
charges applicable to the issuance of permits.
The occupancy of any structure within said plats for
residential purposes shall be prohibited by the City until municipal
sanitary sewer and water lines shall have been installed and are
available to serve the lot for which a building permit shall have been
issued.
-5-
3/19/79 Draft
19. Remedies Upon Default.
a. Assessments. In the event the Applicants shall default
in the performance of any of the covenants and agreements herein con-
tained, and such default shall not have been cured within ten (10) days
after receipt by the Applicants of written notice thereof, the City,
if it so elects, may cause any of the required improvements to be
constructed and installed, and may cause the entire cost thereof,
including all reasonable engineering, legal and administrative expense
incurred by the City, to be recovered as a special assessment under
M.S. Chapter 429, in which case the Applicants agree to pay the entire
amount of the assessment roll pertaining to any such improvement
within thirty (30) days after its adoption. Applicants further agree
that in the event of their failure to pay in full any such special
assessment within the time prescribed herein, the City shall have a
specific lien on all of.Applicants' real property within said plan for
any amount so unpaid, and the City shall have the right to foreclose
said lien in the manner prescribed for the foreclosure of mechanic's
liens under the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event of an
emergency, as determined by the City Engineers, the notice requirements
to the Applicants shall be and hereby are waived in their entirety,
and the Applicants shall reimburse the City for any expense incurred
by the City in remedying the conditions creating the emergency.
b. Performance Bond. In addition to the foregoing, the
City may also institute legal action against the Applicants and the
corporate surety on their performance bond, or utilize any cash
deposit made or letter of credit delivered hereunder, to collect, pay
or reimburse the City for the cost of making any of said improvements.
C. Legal Proceedings. In addition to the foregoing, the
City may institute any proper action or proceeding at law or at equity
to prevent violations of the within development contract, to restrain
or abate violations of the within development contract, or to prevent
use or occupancy of the proposed dwellings.
20. Special Conditions.
a. Landscaping. Landscaping and location of structures on
individual lots shall be determined through discussions between City
staff and Applicants or their assigns prior to issuance of building
permits, subject to the following standards and conditions:
i. Landscaping and location of structures shall
take into consideration the preservation of trees, slope
protection, subsurface drainage, prevention of siltation
and similar potential problems.
ii. In the event agreement cannot be reached between
the City staff and Applicants or their assigns, the City
shall have the right, at the expense of the Applicants or
their assigns, to engage the services of the City Engineer,
Planner, a landscape architect, a soil conservation con-
sultant, and others, to advise as to specific problems.
3/19/79 Draft
iii. The certificate of occupancy for each homesite,
or covenants and restrictions, may contain conditions for
tree maintenance and restrictions on tree removal, after
consultations with the City Forester.
iv. Individual site drainage, basement waterproofing,
and footing drains for each residential structure to be con-
structed upon the subject property shall be constructed
when necessary and appropriate.
b. Redistribution of Existing Assessment. Applicants
acknowledge receipt of the report of Schoell & Madson, Inc., City
Engineers, dated May 4, 1978, relating to existing water services to
serve the plat, and agree to be bound by the determination of the City
regarding any redistribution of existing assessments, and the imposition of
future assessments for proposed lots for sanitary sewer and watermains.
C. Utility Easements. Side and rear lot utility easements
on all lots shall be shown on the final plat.
d. Tree to be Provided. The Applicants shall provide each
lot with one boulevard tree of a specie acceptable to the City Forester
and of a diameter of not less than 1-1/2".
e. Homeowners' Association. Outlot B of Minnewashta Creek
First Addition, which is owned by the Applicants (hereinafter Outlot B),
shall be reserved for the sole use of property owners within the plats
of Minnewashta Creek First and Second Additions in gaining pedestrian
access to Lake Minnewashta. Applicants shall organize a homeowners'
association in the form of a non-profit corporation, and said Outlot B
shall be conveyed to and managed by said association. The articles of
incorporation and Bylaws of the association shall be approved by the
City Attorney. For purposes of this agreement, said Outlot B shall be
classed as nondedicated open space under the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance,
to which the provisions of Chap. 21.03 thereof shall apply.
f. Restrictive Covenants. Said outlot B shall be encumbered
with restrictive covenants which shall regulate parking of motor vehicles,
docking of water craft, erection of structures, and which shall prohibit
overnight camping. Said restrictive covenants shall be recorded in
the office of the Carver County Recorder after said covenants have been
approved by the City Attorney.
g. Limitation on Alteration of Outlot B. No portion of
Outlot B shall be developed, altered or disturbed in any way except
after first having obtained a permit from the Chanhassen City Council
for any such development, alteration, or disturbance. For purposes of
this development contract, said permit shall be deemed to be a conditional
use permit and the permit application process and procedures shall be as
set forth in 523 of the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance.
h. Address of Applicants. The address of the Applicants
for purposes of this development contract is: 3295 Hillsboro Avenue
South, St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55426.
-7-
m ' 3/19/79 Draft
22. Single Occupancy and Double Occupancy Lots. Lots 15,
16, 17, 27, 28, and 29 in Block 1 in the proposed plat may be used for
either "single family dwelling" purposes of "two family dwelling"
purposes, as those terms are defined in the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance.
Any lots in the plat of Minnewashta Creek Second Addition which are not
enumerated in the previous sentence shall be used exclusively for
"single family dwelling" purposes.
23. Final Plat. The Applicants agree to proceed immediately
with the preparation of their final plat, which shall conform to their
approved preliminary plat as prepared by Clark Engineering Co. and
dated April 26, 1978 with the following modification:
Said plat shall depict the location of certain perpetual
easements for public storm water drainage purposes and
public storm water holding pond purposes. The location and
configuration of said perpetual easements shall be approved
in writing by the City Engineers.
24. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Applicants shall
furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that they are
fee owners of the.subject property.
25. Successors and Assigns. It is agreed by and between the
parties hereto that the agreement herein contained shall be binding upon
and.inure to the benefit of their respective legal representatives,
successors and assigns.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these
presents to be executed on the day and year first above written.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
By
Donald B. Berkey Mayor
Jane L. Berkey
Attest:
Clerk/Manager
ROMARCO DEVELOPMENT, INC.
By
Its
And
Im
s
3/19/79 Draft
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss.
COUNTY OF CARVER
On this day of , 1979, before me, a
notary public within and for said County, personally appeared
Walter Hobbs and Donald W. Ashworth, to me personally known, who, being
each by me duly sworn, did say that they are respectively the Mayor
and.City Manager of the municipal corporation named in the foregoing
instrument, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of
said corporation by authority of its City Council, and said Walter
Hobbs and Donald W. Ashworth acknowledged said instrument to be the
free act and deed of said corporation.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss.
COUNTY OF
Notary Public, County, Minn.
My Commission Expires
On this day of , 1979, before me, a
notary public, within and for said County, personally appeared Donald
B. Berkey and Jane L. Berkey, to me known to be the persons described
in, and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that
they executed the same as their free act and deed.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss.
COUNTY OF
Notary Public, County, Minn.
My Commission Expires
On this day of , 1979, before me, a
notary public within and for said County, personally appeared
and , to me personally
known, who, being by me duly sworn, did say that they are respectively
the and the of Romarco
Development, Inc., the corporation named in.the foregoing instrument,
and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said
corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and said
and acknowledged said instrument to
be the free act and deed of said corporation.
Notary Public, County, Minn.
My Commission Expires
ME
f
7
EXHIBIT A
TO
MINNEWASHTA CREEK DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
Legal. Description:
Outlot A, Minnewashta Creek First Addition according
to the map or plat thereof on file or of record in
the office of the County Recorder in and for Carver
County, Minnesota.
0.
t� LARSON & MERTZ
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
RUSSELL H. LARSON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE
CRAIG M. MERTZ
(612) 335-9565
OF COUNSEL
HARVEY E. SKAAR
MARK C. McCULLOUGH
January 31, 1979
Mr. Bob Waibel
Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Dear Bob,
Some months ago I provided you with our draft of
Chanhassen Ordinance No. 47-M which would have the effect of
rezoning the Minnewashta Creek Second Addition to zone P-1.
I am attempting to update our zoning ordinance. Inasmuch as the
P-1 zone would require a development contract in all cases, I
believe that you may safely arrange for publication of Ordinance
No. 47-M at this time.
This rezoning was approved by the City Council on June 5, 1978.
The original copy of the ordinance is probably attached to the
original copy of the development contract in your file P-499.
CMM:jep
Yours very truly,
CRAIG M. MERTZ
Assistant Chanhassen Attorney
BY MESSENGER
EEE1979
Re�GEIVED
VILLgGe or
CHAMP A,,SZN�
M1NN. . 4C
7610 LAREDO DRIVEeP.O. BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
December 18, 1978
Mr. Robert Ritter
3295 Hillsboro Avenue
Minneapolis, . MCQ 55426
Dear Mr. Ritter:
on Monday, December 4, 1978, the City Council authorized a six (6) month extension
period for the completion of the final plat for Nlinnewashta Creek Second Addition.
If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincere!.
Don Ashworth
City Manager
DA:k
cc: Bob Waibel, Assistant City Planner
CITY OF
7610 LAREDO DRIVE®P.O. BOX 147sCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
November 29, 1978
Ritter and Welter
3295 Hillsboro Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55426
Dear Mr. Ritter:
I am placing your request to extend the development time for your
subdivision (Minnewashta Creek 2nd Addition) on the city council
agenda of December 4, 1978. This item will be placed as a consent
agenda item with this office recommending that the city council
approve your request as presented. Should the city council have
questions of staffthat we are unable to answer on December 4th or
should the city council wi8.h..to discuss this item with you, this
item would be deleted from the consent agenda and you would be
requested to attend a future council meeting to discuss such
specific points. As such, you need not attend the council meeting
of December 4th; however, you may do so if you so desire. This
office will notify you should the city council wish to speak with
you regarding this item or if the item has been approved as
recommended by this office.
If you.have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerel,,',
Don Ashworth
City Manager
DA:k
//
November 20, 1978
Ritter & Welter
3295 Hillsboro Ave. So.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426
City of Chanhas s an
Mr. Donald Ashworth
City Manager
Chanhassan, Minnesota
Dear Sir ,
As the developers of the subdivision to be known
as Minnewashta Creek Second addition, we are requesting
an extension of an additional six months time to
prepare our final olat for the afore mentioned subdivision.
The lateness of the construction season along with d.elays
in preparing the engineering and legal necessary
for final aDDrova l are the reasons for this request.
Y.indly accept our thanks for consideration of this
request.
Sincerely,
Robert J. Ritter
NOV I r78
149
7610 LAREDO DRIVE®P.O. BOX 147*CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
Decen-ber 18, 1978
Mr. Robert Ritter
3295 Hillsboro Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55426
Dear Mr. Ritter: g
an Monday, Deeenber 4, 1978, the City Council authorized a sip: (6) month extension
period for the eorpletion of the final plat for 14i.nnewashta Creek Second Addition.
if you have any further questions, please feel free to contact M.
Sincere
Lon Ashworth
City Manager
DA:k
�� a e�if
5
cc: Bob Waibel, Assistant City Planner
A
y x Y
fl
I TY- OF
oft*a
7610 •' •• DRIVEeP.O. BOX 1470CHANHASSEN,• • 55317
• • !SS
November 29, 1978
Ritter and Welter
3295 Hillsboro Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55426
Dear Mr. Ritter:
i am placing your request taextend the development time for your
subdivision (Minnewashta 1. Creek 2nd Addition) on the city council
agenda of December 4, 1978. This item will be placed as a consent
agenda item with.this office recommending that the city council
approve your request as presented. Should the city council have
questions of staff. that we are unable, to answer on December 4th or
should the city council wish. -to discuss this item with you, this
item would be deleted from the consent. agenda and you would be
requested to attend a future council meeting to discuss such
specific points. As such, you need not attend the council meeting
of December 4th; however, you may do so -if you so desire. This
office will notify you should the city council wish to speak with
you regarding this item or if the item has been approved as
recommended by this office.
if you. have any questions; please feel. free- to contact me.
Sincerel
Don Ashworth
City Manager
DA:k
RUSSELL H. LARSON
CRAIG M. MERTZ
OF COUNSEL
HARVEY E. SKAAR
MARK C. McCULLOUGH
Bob Waibel
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Dear Bob,
LARSON & MERTZ
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE
(612) 335-9565
September 13, 1978 71114
Re: Minnewashta Creek SJt�"cQnd.�%
Addition
Enclosed you will find my proposed development contract for the
above described plat. If you find this development contract to
be in order, I ask that you submit it to the developers for their
signatures. You should then make appropriate entries in your
tickler system to ensure that the City acquires the easement
required by paragraph 5c (water main easement across Lots 6 and 7,
Block 1, Pleasant Acres), and also that the developers convey
the improvements to the City in accordance with paragraph 17.
You should call the developers' attention specifically to paragraph
23. It is intended that the final plat depict certain perpetual
storm water easements which have been approved by the City Engineer
in accordance with the Minnewashta Creek Watershed District letter
dated August 21, 1978.
At this time, you should ask the applicants to provide this office
with proof of title. Any recent title opinion from the applicants'
attorney could be satisfactory for our purposes.
Also enclosed you will find the necessary formal ordinance amendment
which should be submitted to the council to effectuate the change in
zoning. from RI to Pl.
Very truly yours,
CRAIG M. MERTZ
Assistant Chanhassen Attorney
CMM:jep
Enclosures
BY MESSENGER
RUSSELL H. LARSON
CRAIG M. MERTZ
OF COUNSEL
HARVEY E. SKAAR
MARK C. McCULLOUGH
Donald W. Ashworth
City Manager
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Dear Don,
LARSON & MERTZ
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BU'LCIING
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
September 21, 1978
�OM
6d
TELEPHONE
(612) 33S-9565
While preparing the Robert Ritter Development Contract, we noted
that the City Council has not adopted the necessary ordinance to
formally rezone two of the planned residential developments which
have been previously approved.
Enclosed you will find our proposed Ordinance 47-N, which has the
effect of rezoning Minnewashta Woods and Sunnyslope Addition to
P-1. The public hearings on these rezonings have been held
previously. Ordinance 47-N could be submitted to the Council as
a consent agenda item.
Very truly yours,
CRAIG M. MERTZ
Assistant City Attorney
CMM : j ep
Enclosure
SEA 197g f
L
ECEIVED
CI'I►ANy
al a
.. .. .... • �.aF •f.w.. ...... .• .ra,... . •.a . . ,.. i U... ....i r ..trio .:i�Y':e'i.YtA4.:.{r.;5.'ar4•: , .. _ . _...a .
-35-
PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (PRD)
or CASE NO. PRD/PCD
PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (PCD)
City of Chanhassen
Carver and Hennepin Counties, Minnesota
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST
Date of Application
Escrow Paid Date
Received by,
Applicant,
Name:
Last
Address:
Owner: A.
Last
Address: /,
Number and Street
Address of property in question:
L
8
a
rst Initial
City State Zip Code
Legal description of property in question: l
Present zoning of property: f�
Present use of property:
Proposed use of property:�,,,K�.:-�,o
The following documents shall be attached to this application:
Date Received Initial
1. Sketch Plan
2. Preliminary Development Plan
3. Escrow Account
-36-
0
DateReceived Initial
4. Abstractor's Certificate
5. Final Development Plan
I hereby declare that all statements made in this application and
the attached documents are true, and that I shall reimburse the
City for all expenses incurred in on
Planned unit development. processing this application for
1 nature o A scant
r
Signature of Owner
Date
Received y Title
Date
(Following to be completed by Aoning Administrator or City Official)
IN
Sketch Plan on Planning Commission�Aenda DATE �BY
Plannin Commission Post oned to
Preliminary Development Plan on
Planning Commission Agenda
(Planning Commission Postpo
Newspaper Publication
_ ajacent Pro erty Owners N,
Public Hearing
Planning Commission Act
Preliminary Development
Council Agenda
Council Postponed to
Council Action
PrelimI
to
irie
Plan on
Final DevelopmentoPlantorlan Contract
Plannincr Commission A enda
Plannin Commission Post oned to
Final Develo ment Plan on Council A e Council Post oned to
Final Develo ment Plan Contract Execu
Escrow Returned - Amount:
_ t
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (Preliminary Development
On this day of 19 ...this'PRD/PCD
was recommended for (approva , sapproval subject to.the
following conditions:
Chairman of Panning Commission
Action by City - Preliminary Development Plan
On this day of 19 , the Chanhassen City
Council, Carver an Hennepin Counties, Minnesola—(approved), (disapproved
this Preliminary PRD/PCD subject to the following conditions:
By order of the Chanhassen
City Council
Mayor
Attest:
City Administrator
-38-
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION - Final Development Plan
On this day of 19 , this Final
Development Plan was recommended for approval), disapproval) subject
to the following conditions:
Chairman of Planning Commission
Action by City - Final Development Plan
On this day of 19 , the Chanhassen City
Council, Carver anc: Hennepin Counties, Minnesota (approved.), (disapproved
this Final PRD/PCD subject to the following conditions:
By order of the Chanhassen
City Council
yor
Attest:
City Administrator
L
j f LARSOW & MERTZ
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BU'LDING
RUSSELL H. LARSON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
CRAIG M. MERTZ
OF COUNSEL
HARVEY E. SKAAR
MARK C. MCCULLOUGH
September 21, 1978
Donald W. Ashworth
City Manager
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Dear Don,
v J ?, / Prl
TELEPHONE
(612) 335-9565
While preparing the Robert Ritter Development Contract, we noted
that the City Council has not adopted the necessary ordinance to
formally rezone two of the planned residential developments which
have been previously approved.
Enclosed you will find our proposed Ordinance 47-N, which has the
effect of rezoning Minnewashta Woods and Sunnyslope Addition to
P-1. The public hearings on these rezonings have been held
previously. Ordinance 47-N could be submitted to the Council as
a consent agenda item.
Very truly yours,
CRAIG M. MERTZ
Assistant.City Attorney
Ci4M:jep
Enclosure