Loading...
78-01 - Open Storage ZOA pt 14 CITY OF own t"".. Tti-I CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Paul Krauss, Planning Director DATE: December 30, 1991 SUBJ: Legal Procedures Relative to Outdoor Storage and Non -conforming Uses From time to time, Steve Emmings provides me with copies of court actions of interest involved with community development. The attached opinion concerns a case involving outdoor storage as a non -conforming use. The court Is treatment of the non -conformity is particularly interesting since some of the arguments bear a resemblance to those made by the Moon Valley operators. The appeals court ultimately upheld a permanent injunction obtained by the City of Savage over an outdoor storage yard operator. The operator expanded the non -conformity to a different portion of the site after the city enacted an ordinance regulating outdoor storage. Apparently, in spite of repeated attempts to have the matter rectified without success, the city took the operator to court. is t *' PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER FINANCE AND COMMERCE COURT Or APPEALS EDITION C0UR-T`-0.. APPEA*LS- UNPUBLISHED This opinion will be unpublished and y : ` may not be cited except as provided by 'Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (1990) ' STATE OF MINNESOTA 1N COURT OF APPEALS - CX-91-986 Scott County Parker, Judge District Court file 9011878 City of Savage, Phillip R. Krass Krass & Monroe, Ch. Respondent; 1650 West 82nd Street Bloomington, MN 55431 vs.,. Richard)(nutson; Inc., Jeffrey C. Paulson David D. Hammargren Appellant: Christoffel & Elliott, P.A. 805 Capital Centre - . . 386 North Wabasha Street St. Paul, MN 55102 Filed November 5, 1991 Office of Appellate Courts ' Affu-med. ' Considered and decided by Lansing, Presiding Judge, Parker, Judge, and Foley, Judge. ' UNPUBLISHED OPINION PARKER, JUDGE (Hon. John Fitzgerald, District Court Trial Judge) The City of Savage sought a permanent injunction to prevent Richard Knutson, Inc. (RKI), from maintaining open storage on its Boone Avenue property, claiming that RKI's storage area exceeded limits imposed by ordinance and that the company had not obtained a special -use permit to allow, it to deviate from those limits. After a trial to the court, an order permanently enjoining RIG from using the property for open storage was issued. RKI appealed and moved this court for an order staying enforcement of the in junction. We granted the stay pending our decision on the merits of the appeal. RIG asserts that one of the trial court's findings was clearly erroneous, that it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to admit certain photographs, that the trial court erred in interpreting the nonconforming -use ordinance, and that the court issued an overbroad injunction. DECISION 1. A reviewing court will not set aside the trial court's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Minn. R. Civ. P.52.01.- The trial court found: 3. That [RKI] used the northern two-thirds of the prop-erty, hereinafter referred to as Boone Avenue • * * for open storage beginning in the summer of 1969, and from 1975 until the present used both the upper and lower portions of the property. 8. That on October 10,1973, at the time of the enact-ment of the open storage non -conforming use regulations, [RKI] used the north- em two-thirds of the Boone Avenue property for storage. 9. That [RKI] impermissibly expanded its use of the Boone Avenue property as an open storage site by using the land on the southern one-third of the parcel for storage beginning in 1975. B13 NOVEMBER 8, 1991 RKI maintains the finding that it did not use the southern portion of the property.for open storage before 1975 is clearly erroneous. The company states that, prior to 1975, if used this part of the land for access and for turning trucks and equipment about to serve the northern portion: We'are unpersuaded by -this argument. Testimony establislied that' the water table was within a foot of the surface on the southern part. of the property prior to 1975: At that time the ground was so wet that the weeds were impossible to cut and it was unsuitable for storage. Knutson himself admitted he did not begin to place fill on the property to raise its elevation until he bought it in April 1975. If the soil was too wet for storage before it was improved, it would. be too muddy for travel because heavy equipment would sink. The trial court's findings of fact cannot be deemed clear error. 2. The admissibilityof photographic evidence rests with the trial court's discretion and the reviewing court will not reverse absent an abuse of discretion. Hueper v. Goodrich, 263 N.W.2d 408, 411 (Minn.1978). RIG challenges the trial court's admission of 1971 and 1974 photographs offered by the city to prove that the southern portion was not used for storage before the open -storage regulation took effect. The company asserts that the photos were taken in spring, when RKI's equipment would be at job sites, that the height from which they were taken obscured details, and that the 1974 photo- graphs were admitted with insufficient foundation. Minn. R. Evid. 901(a) states: The requirement of authentication or identification as a condition precedent to. admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims. RIG's employee, who had been with the company since.1970, hesitantly authenticated all three photos, although he also testi-fied that he had never obtained an aerial view of the property. Concern- ing the 1974 photographs, he stated, "I don't know if, you know, as far as existing in. 1974 if that's "what it looked like. I --the pipes are still there and, I mean; it looks like the same place to me." Thus, the rule was satisfied, someone with knowledge of the prof erty at the relevant time was able to identify it. The questions concerning the date of the photographs, the time of year they were taken, the clarityof details, and the hesitancy of the testimony go to the weight to be given the evidence, not to its admissibility. It must be borne in mind that this was a bench trial, conducted by a judge of considerable experience. A trial judge is more fitted by education and experience to sort out the probative value of evidence than a lay jury can reasonably be expected to be. 3. The interpretation of a zoning ordinance is a question of law, and this court owes no deference to the trial court's inter-pretation. AMOCON Corp. v. City of Eagan, 348 N W.2d 66, 72 (Minn. 1984). Savage, Minn., Ordinance 57,•§ 2.4 (Oct. 10, 1973), provides: The lawful use of any land or buildings existing at the time of the adoption of the Ordinance may be con- tinued; even if such use does not conform to the regula- tions of the Ordinance, except as provided below: 2.3.2.2 Relocations. A nonconforming use shall not be moved to any other part of the parcel of land upon which the same was conducted at the time of the passage of this ordinance. The court found that RKI .did. not use the southern parcel for storage prior to the enactment, of the zoning ordinance and that its use of the southern part of the property for storage constituted an impermissible "relocation" of a nonconforming use. RIG maintains that the trial court's interpretation of "relocate" is overly broad. "Relocate," the company argues, means to leave one point entirely and begin again at a new place. Acoord-ingly, it did not "relocate," since it continuously used the northern part and expanded its prior nonconforming use to the south. RIG asserts, in short, that the subdivision governing relocation does not proscribe expansion. To support its argument, RKI uses the headnote printed before subdivision 2.3.2.2 of the ordinance, entitled "Relocations." Use of N�OVEMBER 891991 FINANCE AND COMMERCE COURT OF APPEALs WnON a headnote is not a proper way to determi gislative intent. See Man. Stat. § 645.49 (1990) (headnote is merely a catchword to indicate the contents of the subdivision and is not part of the statute); Wangensteen v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co., 218 Minn. 318, 322, 16 N.W.2d 50, 52 (1944) (headline is not part of the act and change in headline cannot be used to indicate legislative intent to change the law). The language of the subdivision prohibits "moving" a noncon- forming use to any other part of the parcel of land. We reject as unduly restrictive RKI's view of the term "moving." RKI moved its open -storage activities from the extreme northern end of the prop-erty to the extreme southern end, very near to a well -kept resi-dential neighborhood immediately south of the property. Under these circumstances, the trial court cannot be said to have inisap-plied the ordinance in prohibiting this particular "moving." In changing the impact of the nonconforming use to adjacent proper- ty on the south, RKI "moved" the use and violated the ordinance. 4. Whether to grant an injunction generally rests within the sound discretion of the trial court, and its action will not be disturbed upon appeal unless, based upon the whole record, it appears there has been an abuse of such discretion. Cherne Indus., Inc. v. Grounds & Assoc., Inc., 278 N.W.2d 81, 91(Minn.1979). The court must frame injunctive relief, however, to remedy the specific harm claimed. Hartford -Empire Co. v. United States, 323 U.S. 386, 410, 65 S.Ct. •373, 385 (1945). The trial court permanently enjoined RKI from maintaining open storage on any part of its Boone Avenue property. RIG argues the northern and southern parts of the property are two distinct parcels of land and the court's injunction was overly broad because the activities on the northern parcel were protected by the "grandfather" provisions of the nonconforming -use or- dinance. Issues not raised in the trial court will not be reviewed for the first time on appeal. Woody v. Krueger, 374 N.W.2d 822, 824 (Minn. App. 1985). RIC has not previously alleged that the north -ern and southern parts of the Boone Avenue property were two distinct parcels of land. RKI's answer and counterclaim state: For the time period beginning prior to the enactment of the city's zoning ordinance to the present, [RKI] had used the entire parcel for open storage of equipment, vehicles, and materials, this use has been continuous and uninterrupted and has not been abandoned by [RKI] at any time. (Emphasis added.) RIG's post -trial memorandum states: RIG always considered the storage yard as a single parcel to be used for the storage of vehicles, equipment and materials. Knutson testified he bought the two parcels "as one parcel." RKI also applied for a single permit for the .entire property. The trial court treated the property as one tract, as shown by the legal description in the order, which encompassed both the northern and southern portions. The court found RKI moved its prior non- conforming use from one part to another part of the Boone Avenue property. Because of the move, the activities on the north -ern part were no longer permissible. The scope of the court'sinjunction, dictated by the extent of the violation established, was not over- broad. Evidence showed RKI significantly increased and expanded its nonconforming use on the northern portion, and loss of the protection of the grandfather provisions for the northern part of this single tract does not appear to constitute an abuse of discretion, in view of RIG's violation of the ordinance.' Injunction is an equitable remedy. If the plaintiff has proved that he or she is entitled to a permanent injunction, the court must then balance the equities in determining whether an injunction should be issued. Minnesota Pub. Interest Research Group v. Butz, 358 F. Supp. 584,625 (D. Minn. 1973). In balancing the equities, the court appropriately considered the 'History of this case. The company twice applied for and was granted a special -use permit, conditioned upon its fulfilling certain require- ments regarding improvement of the property. The first permit was B14 extended three time that the company could complete the required work on the pruperty. The city revoked the permit in 1989 for noncompliance with the conditions precedent to obtaining it. In 1990, RKI again applied for a special -use permit, which was granted subject to fulfilling the conditions precedent. Again, RKI did not comply with the conditions. Although RKI loses a storage site, the city would have per-mitted it to continue this use had it complied with the necessary conditions. The city cannot plan uniform property development and control nonconforming uses if it cannot insist that conditions precedent to obtaining these permits are met. It was not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to determine that the equities weighed on the side of granting the injunction, or to apply the injunction to the entire tract. Affirmed. This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (1990) STATE OF MI NESbTA".; 1N COURT Qf�,APPEAL Hennepin County Lansing, Judge District Court #8821439 Transamerica Insurance Patrick J. O'Connor, Jr. Finance Corporation, Faegre & Benson Wa Tifco, Inc., 2200 Norwest Center 90 South Seventh Street Appellant, Minneapolis, MN 55402 VS. Western National Mutual James T. Martin Insurance Company, Gislason, Martin & Varpness, P.A. Respondent, 7600 Parklawn Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 Mid -Continent Agencies, Inc., Defendant. Filed: November 5, 1991 Office of Appellate Courts Considered and decided by Norton, Presiding -Judge, Lansing, Judge, and Short, Judge. - UNPUBLISHED OPINION LANSING, JUDGE (Hon. Eugene Minenko, District Court Trial Judge) Insurance premium financing company seeks recovery of money paid to insurance agency but not forwarded to insurer. We affirm the trial court's denial of judgment against the insurer but reverse and remand for entry of judgment against the agency. FACTS As part of its insurance premium financing business, Tifco financed policy premiums for Rainbow, Inc. and Ace Blacktop, Inc. See Minn. Stat. §§ 59A.01-.15 (1990). The policies were issued by Western National Mutual Insurance Co. and written through Mid - Continent Agencies, Inc. Western markets insurance through a network of independent agencies. _ Tifco's premium finance agreements required Rainbow and Ace to remit a cash down payment and pay the remainder in equal installments. Under a purported "appointment of agent," Mid -Con- tinent received notices for and collected payments from the insureds. Although designed primarily for insurance polices that require an annual payment in advance, the premium financing agreements with Rainbow and Ace were on policies that allowed for interest -free Council Meeting July 18.--,1983 -6- Councilman Horn moved to approve the subdivision request, Planning Case 83-6. as depicted on the preliminary plat for Murray Hill Second Addition dated received June 22, 1983, Chanhassen Community Development Department. Motion seconded by Mayor Hamilton. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. CHANHASSEN CEMETARY, GALPIN BLVD. Mayor Hamilton moved to table action until someone from the association is present. Motion seconded by Councilman Geving. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. CHES-MAR DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS, CARVER COUNTY: Councilman Horn moved to approve the Carver County plan for improvements to Ches-Mar Drive with the condition that a street light be installed at the end of the street vaca- tion. Motion seconded by Mayor Hamilton. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. RILEY/MENTIN DRAINAGE AGREEMENT: RESOLUTION -�?83-33: Councilwoman Swenson moved the adoption —of a resolution accepting the City Engineer's and City Attorney's agreement to install improvements as outlined in the City Engineer's letter to Steven Riley dated June 14, 1983, and present a cash settlement of $3,500 to be split between adjacent owners. The $5,850 to be allocated from MSA Fund interest earnings to cover the expense of the improvements. Resolution seconded by Mayor Hamilton. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwomen Swenson and Watson, Councilmen Geving and Horn. No negative votes. Motion carried. OPEN STORAGE: The City Manager asked the Council if the staff should take a more active role in removing trash, junk, business equipment, etc., or should staff look for a more comprehensive review by the Planning Commission. The City Attorney suggested warning letters followed by action for junk, trash, unlicensed cars, etc. As far as potential Zoning Ordinance violations, he recommended that the ordinance should be updated prior to citing violations. Council members requested a list of violators and violations for their review. 1984 PRELIMINARY LAWCON GRANT APPLICATION: The Park and Recreation Commission discussed the question of grant applications at their July 12 meeting. This discussion generated a concensus that at this point the City should be establishing development instead of acquisition as the number one park priority, unless that acquisition was contiguous to an existing park or a step in a developed plan. They recommended the following two prelimi- nary applications be submitted: 1. Development of Herman Field, an 11.3 acre park tract north of the intersection of Oriole and West 64th Street. Cost items would include the access road, parking facilities and overall site grading including drainage improvements. 2. Installation of lights at a softball field at Lake Ann Park (probably Field #1). Councilman Geving - Rather than that development of Herman Field,and I know that's an area in Chanhassen we are not doing a lot for the people up there recreation wise, but the big area in Chanhassen that gets the most play is CITY OF = CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Manager, Don Ashworth DATE: July 18, 1983 SUBJ: Open Storage, Discussion The City Council at various times during the past two years has questioned various types of open storage within the City. Should time be available Monday evening, I would like to generally discuss this item with the Council. I(,- ep (401j LAW OFFICES GRANNIS, GRANNIS, CAMPBELL & FARRELL DAVID L. GRANNIS - 1874-1961 DAVID L. GRANNIS, JR. - 1910-1980 VANCE B. GRANNIS VANCE B. GRANNIS, JR. THOMAS J. CAMPBELL PATRICK A. FARRELL DAVID L. GRANNIS, III ROGER N. KNUTSON ROBERT R. KINC, JR. THOMAS M. SCOTT GARY G. FUCHS MARY S. VUJOVICH Mr. Donald Ashworth City Manager City of Chanhassen P. 0. Box 147 Chanhassen, M.3 55317 PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 403 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING POST OFFICE BOX 57 161 NORTH CONCORD EXCHANGE SOUTH ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55075 Re: Open Storage Dear Don: 612-455-1661 June 21, 1983 FORMERLY GRANNIS & GRANNIS ESTABLISHED 1907 I recently went on an inspection tour with Scott Martin and George Donnelly. They pointed out to me several unsightly yards and asked my opinion about what could be done. The city's nuisance ordi- nance, Ordinance No. 22, and junk car ordinance, Ordinance No. 48, can be used to prosecute citizens for accumulation of trash, old machinery and junked cars. The practical problem is that what you and I consider trash and junk is not necessarily what someone else might consider it. The more flagrant the situation, the easier prose- cution becomes. If it appears that the owner might claim that some- thing is not junk but is simply "exterior storage", the best mechanism of control is through the zoning ordinance. Unfortunately, the current ordinance does not adequately address exterior storage. Based upon the current situation, I recommend: 1. When the problem only involves accumulated trash, that the violator be warned or prosecuted under the city's nuisance ordi- nance. 2. Where there is some question that an owner might claim that their junked cars and machinery are in fact not junk, that pro- secution be withheld until the city updates its zoning ordinance to better regulate outside storage. RECEIVED J UN 2 21983 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RNK/jf cc: Scott Martin George Donnelly Ve yours, GRANNIS RANNIS, CITY""OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 0 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 MEMORANDUM TO: Scott A. Martin, Community Development t2/17 js2 Dail � M Director.. f-�-- FROM: George Donnelly, Building Official , DATE: December 22, 1982 RE: Zoning Violations Recently, I have heard much about a shortage of funds with which to run the City. In fact, you have directed me to refrain from making even the smallest of purchases, including film. In light of this fact, I wonder about the advisability of pursuing minor zoning violations, i.e. public nuisance. Many of these cases have gone to litigation at a --considerable cost to the City. At times, I wonder if the results of our efforts are worth the expense incurred by the tax payers. Sometimes a complaint of a violation is nothing more than a neighborhood squabble, with one neighbor using the City as a means of harassment. I realize that I cannot make distictions in.these matters, but perhaps we could have a "cooling -off period" during which some of these disputes may be resolved without City.interference. Of course, I feel we must attend to serious violaticnsas quickly as time will allow. However, until'I am free to buy film,.I will not be.able to collect evidence which is essential to any litigation and does therefore restrict me from attending to current complaints. (AftAk PAe^ OA"4� OF ((((W3/ kt, LAI CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE OF HEARING STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) Don Ashworth being first duly sworn, on oath deposes and says that he is and was on May 16 19 78 , the duly qualified and acting City Clerk -Administrator of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date he caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of hearing on a Variance Request for Recreational Vehicles in the City to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mails with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer of Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1I day of Quota r public sus ... KnY KLINGELHUTZ iOTARY PUBLIC. MINNESOTA CARVER COUNTY s '•.� ae; P:1y-C-mmission Expires Jan. 30, 198J t ,.....,�. _._-— Don Ashworth City Manager_ CITY OF CHANHASSEN NOTICE OF HEARING BEFORE THE. BOARD. OF ADJUSTMENTS: AND: APPEALS An appeal has been filed with the Zoning Administrator for a variance to Zoning Ordinance 47, Section 19.16 entitled Outside Storage in a Residential District. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals will conduct a hearing on this appeal on Tuesday, May 30, 1978 at the residences listed below. The approximate time the Board will arrive at each residence is also listed. Jerald Heydt, 6725 Iroquois 6:35 p.m. Gordon Tock, 6598 Huron Ave. 6:50 p.m. Jerry Boucher, 1042 West 67th Street 7:05 p.m. Ralph Livingston, 2631 Orchard Lane 7:25 p.m. Frank Scott, Jr., 2730 Sandpiper Trail 7:40 p.m. L. W. Hagen, 6300 Cypress Drive 7:55 p.m. Lorin Neske, 6221 Dogwood 8:15 P.M. Keith Arntsen, 6320 Elm Tree Ave. 8:30 p.m. Morris Mullin, 3451 Shore Drive 8:45 p.m. Richard Krueger, 3901 Leslee Curve 9:00 P.M. Wesley Searles, 3841 Red Cedar Point 9:15 p.m. Alfred Smith, 3714 Hickory 9:30 p.m. All interested persons may appear and be heard at said time and place. Dick Pearson i 30 . Frontier Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dick Matthews 8017 Cheyenne Ave. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Willard Johnson 1660 W. 63rd Street Excelsior, MN 55331 Jerald Heydt 6725 Iroquois Excelsior, MN 55331 Gordon Tock 111 W. 34th St. Minneapolis, MN 55408 Jerry Boucher 1042 W. 67th St. Excelsior, MN 55331 Ralph Livingston 2631 orchard Lane Excelsior, MN 55331 Frank Scott, Jr. 2730 Sandpiper Trail Excelsior, MN 55331 L. W. Hagen 6300 Cypress Drive Excelsior, MN 55331 Lorin Neske 6221 Dogwood Excelsior, MN 55331 Keith Arntsen 6320 Elm Tree Ave. Excelsior, MN 55331 E-Morris Mullin 3451 Shore Drive Excelsior, MN 55331 �j a Richard Krueger 3901 Leslee Curve Excelsior, MN 55331 Wesley Searles 3841 Red Cedar Point Excelsior, MN 55331 Alfred Smith 3714 Hickory Excelsior, MN 55331 ITY OF CHASE 3 SEX 7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O. BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-8885 December 20, 1977 Mr. Donald Carsik 3342 Shore Drive Excelsior, MN 55331 Dear .Mr. Carsik: The City of Chanhassen has received a complaint in reference to your storage of recreational vehicles on your property at 3342 Shore Drive . Enclosed please find a copy of City Ordinance 47A, Section19.16, entitled Outside Storage in residential districts. Please correct this violation within ten (10) days from the date of this letter or the matter will be turned over to the City Attorneys office for legal action. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 474-8885. Sincerely, r V,A - Gerald W. Schlenk Building Inspector GWS : k Enclosure cc: Russell Larson, City Atttorney John Neveaux, Councilman Bruce Pankonin, City Planner C wTY �`F CHANHI��5E1� 7610 LAREDO DRIVE*P.O. BOX 147®CHANHASSEN, MINNESO i A 55317 (612) 474-8885 December 20, 1977 J11 Mr. Joe Kasper 6351 Dogwood Excelsior, MN 55331 Dear Mr. Kasper: Enclosed please find a copy of the notice of ordinance violation sent to Mr. Carsik. I have also prepared a list of ordinance violations, i.e. recreational vehicles, storage sheds, abandoned vehicles, that now exist in the R-1 zoning districts. This list has been turned over to the zoning administrator. I am hopking that these violations can be cleared up by the summer of 1978. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 474-8885 Sincerely, U e L �& U ad, 1��ML Gerald W. Schlenk Building Inspector GWS:k cc: John Neveaux Enclosure MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS RECREATIONAL VEHICLES An appeal has been filed with the Zoning Administrator for a variance to Zoning Ordinance 47, Section 19.16 entitled Outside Storage in a Residential District. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals Will conduct a hearing on these appeals on Tuesday, July 18, 1978, at the residences listed below. The approximate time the board will.arrive at each residence is also listed: Gordon Seller, 3900 Leslee Curve - 6:45 p.m. Dale Menten, 6630 Minnewashta Parkway - 6:55 p.m. Francis Faber, 3471 Shore. Drive - 7:10 p.m. Donald Carsik, 3342 Shore Drive - 7:20 p.m. Arvin Langum, 3311 Shore Drive - 7:30 p.m. Robert Mortenson, 6330 Cypress Drive - 7:40 p.m. Randall Stoltenberg, 6321 Minnewashta Woods Drive - 7:55 p.m. Melvin Anderson, 1600 Koehnen Circle - 8:10 P.M. - 8:10 P.M. Willard Shoberg, 982 W. 67th St. - 8:20 p.m. Andrew.'Borash, 6725 Nez Perce - 8:30 p.m. Ben Riewe, 6782 Nez Perce - 8:40 p.m. Jerre Johnson, 6861 Nez Perce - 8:50 p.m. Lance Fisher, 401 Highland Drive - 9:05 p.m. Dean 1--lallentine, 507 Chan View - 9:15 p.m. Joel Hedtke, 7611 Laredo Drive - 9:30 p.m. Any interested person may appear and be heard at said time and place. -- 2 4--- CASE NO. VAR. VARIANCE PETITION _ CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST ate of Application,- -'f Fee Paid -- Date _- • ceived by Daytime Phone Y r eA vlep1�11 i :- • First Initial x,ast / Address:, �� `� � E c� L � � C.e— If h fI� { f f /`�!!//Tf� •`�:i�i�/ %'�`i/>Y�Cr. - �� 3 c:� f C2t estate Zip Code Number and Street Y _ Owner blare : Number an Street Ul Cy Address of Property in Question: . Legal description of. _property in question: Reason -for Recques t: __ Zxp code Present zoning of property. -- Present use of property: -�-- - _24_ S VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO.• VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application Fee Paid Date V • Received ved b y-=- *1 Daytime Phone d ;�' L -� �� • • - •, r3ame : yY1 C yl Q Ll -- Last First initial j Address: �e 3 C) 1 � � Ylvl all j_S �_ � � e f o Number and Street Czt) State Zip Code owner name; /I/) E - /4 -� -- a ,z b U c— i3umber and Street City Address of Property in Question: I Legal description Of property in question: Reason for Request: Present zoning of property:_ -_ Present use of property:-_ --- -- State Co --24- .. _ . CASE NO. VARIANCE PETITION CITY OF efiANHASSEN MINNESO`PA CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, APPLICATION FOR CONS DERATION OF PLANNING MQUEST Date of Application May 30, 1978 Paid Date Fee P � Received by____ ^ me 474-8951 Daytime Phone applicant: Francis --- --- 1I . .Name: Faber, _-- First Initial _ Last tlddress: 3471 Shore Drive City - -- State Zap God Number and Street Owner Faber, Francis H. 'Fxcelsior NN 55331 _ I3arn2: 3471 Shore Drive ��P City State CoE� IJumber na d Street �cic3ress of ProRerty in Question : : 3471 Shore Drive Excelsior, Mtd 55331 - Legal description' of property in question: - Reas-on for Reques t = : - — ---- ----- - - y Present zoning of p p _ Present use of property _ -_- ----- - - C�. --24•- VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CON DERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST ate of App� ication Fee Paid //ll Date--- Received by - -- v ,Daytime Phone #� 7 7 760 Applicant' ----- Name: �,ast First Initial. Address.%��` oS d� 7�r2►V EXCEL-Slo%z - M AI, - Number and Street - City State Zip Codc owner. Name - .IJumber and Street City State 2�p Cody cidress of property izi Question : "Legal descri��tion of_ property in question: _ Reason for Request: %dr0 _ Present zoning of property. - Present use of property:__--__ -_ i� f XrARIANCE PETITION 24..- . CASE NO.VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN MINN- RE CARVER AND IIENNEPIN COUNTIES, - - ^ - APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING .REQUEST Date of Application ---- Fee Paid —_ _ Date Received by_-- /�-'. A Daytime Phone , Applicant- tr � ! �=�__ Initial Name'.___; First Last Address: � 3 � � - J /�'y�i . () %1 (tlE= �XG��-•S/y� f� City state. Zip- cQd Number and Street Owner A. N Cam- Lei(' C;C-$/C"d�'{ l Dame : _ S'i-� ��� 1 t/1' city State Zip Cod YJumber. and Street .Address of Property in Question: Legal descri.ptiori of. property in question: Reason. for I2eques t Present zoning of property: __- -- - Present use of property: _- - - - - - - - CASE NO. VAR_ �K VARIANCE PETITION . CITY OF CHANHASSEN _ CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, 14INNESOTA - APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application ' Fee Paid Date Received by — Q �'t,�'r"'�� ,�,� fir. R-• Daytime Phone #� �� _�771lic. r� .' �p are t : Name.First In�tiai Last � ASS �1RivX�E►-SiOf� __1t41 553�- Address : (y 33 � � City Stag Zir Code Number and Street Owner- (g0R-cGnsoh, fZo6��T 30- GsS �V E 1,51'. m 1-i11� SS 3 3 Dame: City State Zip_Code I3umber anel S reet ��d3ress of Property in Question: �c30 ASS -- - - -- - -- — -- - — Legal description of property in question: . Reason for Reques t 'resent- zoning Of property= -----------------— - `- Present use of property = _ - - — ---- - -- — -- •. - . j r_ VARIANCE PETITION -24_ CASE NO.' VAR. ____ — - CITY OF CHANHASSEN NIINNESOTA CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, APPLICATION FOR C NSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application Fee Paid Date Received by _- Daytime Phone Name: -- -- -- First initial Y,ast �/ Address: C/�� l i�,..,��. �S�T -- --- City StateiP C Number and Street���T�,vz�c'�y Owner �Jc•c�S ��' �- Name: C132,1 %i',�'"t"'�s�?� City State Zip, Code Ijumber and Street -Address of Property in Question: , Legal description of_ property in question: Reason for Request: Present zoning of_ property = - _ --- - -- -------�--�-- . present use of VARIANCE PETITION --24 - CASE. NO . VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN - CARVER AND IIENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST %4/� - U-a-a Date of Application a Fee Paid. Date Received Daytime Phone h, 4Z/ Applican Name:` ame: x,aI`ir st jj xna tzal Address: � '��. J Number and Street City , State Zip C���e 1112 Owner G /� r, NName umber and Street City State Zip Code Address of Property in trues 'on: .; Legal description of_ property in .question: Reason for Req Present zoning of property.-___ Present use of property:- - - - - - VARIANCE PETITION -24- CASE No. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, 14INNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date Of Application ' Fee Paid Date v Received c- Daytime Phone Applicant: Name: initial K J-rst Last Address: q 63 Zip CodE. Number and Street city State, Owner 14ame: city ii--umber and street Address Of property in Question Legal description of- property in question: Reas'on for necluest: Present zoning ofproperty: _----- Present use of Property:- --- - State Zap CodE te VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO.' VAR. 7-- CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, r MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST U-AAA---� Date of Application Fee Paid - Date - Received by 01 4 Daytime phone Applicant: Name r First Initial Last 31' 0" Address:- 7 C-1 L-Y State Zip code Number Strut Owner <s Zj Code City State Number and Street : Address of Property in Question property in question: Legal description' Of — ------- - -------- - - - Reason for Request. Present zoning Of property.-__ erty: ........ Present use of prop -24-- VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, 14INNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST . 100H �...._ Date of Application — Fee Paid Date ge'ved by �-'Daytime Phone Applicant: Nance �� Last First Initial Address: �0 `����- ! rz-ro-----G%�C�tSCUY -- - city State Zip Code Number and Street y Owner .. - ---- Name : - . _ � ----- - - - - 1fJumber and Street City State Zip Co e Address of Property inQuestion : , X� en" Addc iL -P- C � --A Legal description- of property in question: . - i., . � '®1 . - - .L/ /� . -�--. , ,n � �, ,-c ,. 41 d. S � 'ems-�.. �CM,I� .. - - • - Reason for iteclues Present zoning of property:e Present use of property: ��Sr �-vJ e` ( - . _24_ ` CASE NO.• VAR. `� J � VARIANCE PETITION_ - CITY OF CHANHASSEN • . CARVER AND HENNEPIN'COUNTIES, 14INNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST ot Date of Application Fee Paid _ Date .o Received by Daytime Phone Applicant: Name: Last First initial . Address: Number and Street City State zip Code Owner Name: --umber and Street City State zip Code Address of Property in Question: Legal description of_ property in question: - Reason for Request: Present zonitug of property: Present use of property: - - -__- -2q_ VARIANCE PETITION CAST: NO. VAR. ) �C CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application yrFee Paid Date -►a U !/ Daytimes Phone Name �-15A e %' Last / y First Initial Address : Q / - n fo It EJj l ve c4c,(x,/ q eti /��ti :��/,,7 Number and Street City State Zip Code' Owner Name Number and Street City State Zip Code Address of Property in Question: S� -- - .Legal description of property in question: Reason, for Request: Ir t0 cCr/e - .L cG e Sir 6/ Present zoning of property: i\eS Present use of property: Pe5 f -24- CASE NO. VA VARIANCE PETITION R. �PETITION� - CITY OF CHANHASSEN CA VER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES t 141NNESOTA LICATIO CONSIDERAT7,ON OF PLANNING REQUEST ✓� Date of Application Fee Paid Date — Received Received by — �A ^` Daytime Phone #� % -• 91 �ppiicant• Name; rl Last I Address:c6A Number and Street Owner I4umber and Street 'Address of Property in Question: First znitial . City State 'Lip Code City State Zip Code Legal description Of property in question: Reason. for Request: 0-7 Present zoning of property:_ _ Present use of property : r,x4- i _ VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application Fee Paid Date Received by . � - 1 Daytime Phone #F Applicant? Name:%/�� -J��� —. -- Last First in Address: 7 /� L �� Av I.J��Vkf Nuinber and Street City State Zip Code Owner 14ame: — --- -- - -- - - - umr beand Street City State Zip Code N 'Address of Property in Question: Legal description' of property in question: Reason for Request: Present zoning of property: Present use of property : _ CITY OF CHANHASSEN NOTICE OF HEARING BEFORE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS An appeal has been filed with the Zoning Administrator for a variance of Zoning Ordinance No. 47. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals will conduct a hearing on these appeals on Tuesday, June 27, 1978, at the residences listed below. The approximate time the Board will arrive at each residence is also listed. All interested persons may appear and be heard at said time and place. Richard Johnson, 600 West 96th Street - 6:45 p.m. Robert McClure, 9401 Kiowa Trail - 7:00 p.m. Harley Robinson, 8502 Great Plains Blvd. - 7:15 p.m. John Segner, 7530 Chanhassen Road - 7:30 p.m. Lloyd Wenning, 75 Pleasant View Road - 7:45 p.m. Louis Guerre, 551 Iroquois - 8:00 p.m. James Congdon, 7610 Iroquois - 8:15 p.m. Raymond Peitz, 1607 Kiowa - 8:30 p.m. Ronald Whipperman, 403 Del Rio Drive - 8:45 p.m. 41 t.x •-• 2 4 - . VAR . CASE NO C0 . VARIANCE PETITION - CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST ' 100 Date of Application'= g-2 -? Fee Paid Date Received by Daytime Phone: Applicant.- Name •Last First- Initial _ ' Address • C7, 7-k Number and Street City State Zip Code Owner Name: - -- Number and Street - - City r--- State Zip Code Address of Property in Question: Legal description' of_ property in question: Reason for Request: r cc 17_0 At Present zoning of property: Present use of property: VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST 04--, Date of Application o? 4 ..M.d �Pa Ad g6o& time Phone #� Name: Last First Initial Address.9 ,/ A,/ Number and Street City State Zip .Code Owner Name: _ Number and Street city. State Zip Code Address of Property in Question: Legal description' of property in question: .. Reason. for Request: ` Present zoning of property: Present use of property: A( VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application = Fee Paid Date i Received by - Daytime Phone - Applicant:: Name _1� c _% r/Z'� _ x4 Name: `. First Ina t%al . _ Address: Number and Street City State Zip Code Owner Name : A.�:-;� Number and Street City -Address of Property in Question: Legal description* of property in question: Reason for Re?que)s t : Pr�Aent zoning of property: Present use of property: -d-e-;. State Zip Code J - l� .�f --z4-- VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR.. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST G.00 Date of Application Fee Paid Date Received by Daytime Phone #� Applicant- = Name,. Zo /7 Last First Initial Address : l'v�3 e e/4'o-/y s� iv y �_ /�ia/L X" Number and Street City State Zip Code Owner - Name; - Number and Street City State zip Code 'Address of Property in Question: Legal description'of_ property in question: Reason for Request: j•✓.h��•--��'`�--' i� i� �"+.�/� � /=,.-- t cf� © Present zoning of property: Present use of property VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA - APPLICATION FOR CONSIDE'YATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application Fee Paid Date 0� Received by - o Daytime Phone # Applicant: Name: �.r .n1 i:�J 0 y c - . Last First Initial Address: �5 /c�sN,,�7`" �li`�,,; J� c% �"re e/S oK .��� 5�5331, ' Number and Street City State Zip Code Owner j Name: il /a j Z. V C- - Numberand Street City State Zip Code Address of Property in Question: ! -� P/e fi S O V l)lt e j J\ �}Gj( , - Legal description' of property in question: Reason for Request: l'. ,�..'�_1#''..i "�.J l�.ct-/Yi ,'-.1• �'"•'�•��„t,i'��Z£�<� t/,-�iC✓) .�.--f � _ r Present zoning of property: Present use of property: -24- VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, 14INNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application��,� Fee Paid -- Received by -- — ---_------ Daytime Phone-__--- Applicantc R. Name: GUER_RE -- LOUIS i,ast First Initial EXCELSIOR - MINN. 55331 Address: 551 IRq�UOIS AVE. -- State---- --� Zip Code Number and Street City Owner LOUIS R. GUERRE 553:1 Name: 551-IRO.gUQIS AVE. EXCELSIOR MINN. IJumber.and Street City State Zip Code Address of Property in Question: same as above - -- - Legal description of property in question: LOT 11 East side North and of Lotus Lake on dead end of Iroquois Ave. .Reason for Request: Cannot drive pick up truck with canper around side of house witdth-= _ too narrow and trees in the way also would have to drive -on lawn and the spaee is too narrow. and steep hill in back,. and would. have to drive ( if it were possible) on the neighbors property.. Present zoning of property _ Present use of property:___--- il VARIANCE PETITION -z4- . CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESO`1'A APPLICATION FOR. CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST • Date of Application 7 9 eO6�6 4a-, ee Paid Date �n ..6.0 Received by - Daytime Phone #� % �-13 Az Applicant: N ame : CDA-) J�qM E,S Last - First initial Address: 7� /L _IRO C1 116l_S C{j ;� s�'N M l Number and Street City State zip Code Owner l Name: 76 /G Q, t1 61 S Number and Street City State zip Code Address of Property ill ouestion : Legal description' of property in question: Present zoning of property: Present use of property:_____ 60 r- --24- 7-�: VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST �_�11 Date of Application% �S W Fee Paid Date Received by - /y Daytime Phone Apple. an C� Cr Name C'iz Last Virst Initial Address Number and Street City State Zip Code Owner Name ' �.,�� � ;�,(� .�f' �� � /�G � /�' ^r`.,,�_r%��F' .IJumb - and Street City State Zip Code Address of Property in Question: Legal description -of property in question: Reason for Request. _ A _C, <- Present zoning of property: Present use of property: --24-• VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. - --- - _ CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST ,j Date of Application L�•�:/ Fee Paid Date ` Received by . Daytime Phone #� Applicant: -Name : \ -0 Last First Initial Address: �f t% '�J. l F- f��G�l/��s`a�� ,J S Number and Street City State Zip Code Owner Name : -S GC. w-'eC,- Number and Street City State Zip Code 'Address of Property in Question: Legal description' of property in question: Reason for Request: 65 r.r'irf !` .7r.etIt'� .1 .i._ 1. Present zoning of property: Present use of property: CITY OF CHANHASSEN NOTICE OF HEARING BEFORE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS An appeal has been filed with the Zoning Administrator for a variance to Zoning Ordinance 47, Section 19.16 entitled Outside Storage in a Residential District. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals will conduct a hearing on this appeal Tuesday, June 13, 1978 at the residences listed below. The approximate time the Board.will arrive at each residence is also lasted. Walford Schwab, 6730 Powers Blvd. - 6:45 p.m. Richard Anding, 3715 S. Cedar Drive - 7:10 p.m. Charles Anding, 3631 S. Cedar Drive - 7:25 p.m. Chester Lobitz, 3637 S. Cedar Drive - 7:40 p.m. David Hempel, 3707 S. Cedar Drive - 7:55 p.m. Earl Morgan, 3924 Hickory - 8:15 p.m. Jack Stone, 6311 Elm Tree - 8:30 p.m. All interested persons may appear and be heard at said time and place. -24- VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER -AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST .� Date of Application Fee Paid Date Received by - Daytime Phone Applicant.-c/�a In�� Name: •s c / �z Last First Initial . Address : � 75� p 0c_U�jS , / Number and Street city State Zip Codes Owner %lam✓ ,�` Name::/ � � Uv+� 2 Number and Street City State Zip Code Address of Property in Question Legal description*ofproperty in question: .Reason _ for Request: Present zoning of property: -- - _- -- -- Present use of property:_ _ _ -24- VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESO`1'A APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application S `%" 7�' Fee Paid Date ' Received by . Applicant: Name: Last Address: t5 Number 7 / 5- - S a Street Daytime Phone First initial City State Zip Code Owner Name: ��/�dD�lJ�,C's��✓ �X-i11A�i �2'.�/ A.r/i �r1s �� S �� ctD�k' .D �' - Number. and Street City State Zip Code Address of Property in Question: Legal description of. property in question: Reason for Request: 01 j Present zoning of property:— Present use of property:_�/;+�a fc ��� . VARIANCE PETITION r _ CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION -OF PLANNING REQUEST _- Date of Application ?AP ' = N .-Fee Paid Date ' . Received by - Daytime Phone y7t1 Applicant: 4VC/ �Name : //- -- -- Last �- First Inztzal Address: 5a ^' Number and Street ity Owner Name: Number. and Street City Address of Property in Question: Legal description' of property in question: Reason . for Reques t : i1 J r State Zip Code Present zoning of property: )? l� Present use of property: Ir P /G� = s 7. VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF.PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application ,ter _ :2 j -7 .- Fee Paid Date U'•� Received by - ` Daytime Phone #� Appl' 4 r Name. Last First Initial Address:T_��n/� Number and Street City State Zip Code Owner Name: �? Number -and Street City State .Address of Property in Question: Co Legal description, of property in question: /V 7- 1-7 :..,. ,Reason for Reclues t x2 Present zoning of property:__ ��s //1�/ /12 �— Present use of property: __ /� E 5 I /� E /U T/' ffo1-77� VARIANCE PETITION --24- CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST _- Date of Application Fee Paid Date Received by Daytime Phone 474 '.`7357• - Applicant: .Name: f-f E Nl P :CJ 4 V L Last First -Initial Address: V 7 I7taYt _1)_0__L_ _ �:c.C-) I L---Mjt f/y Number and Street City State ;Gip Code Owner Name: Ju`t�1'ltAE� x���S��n.2 Number -and Street City State Zip Code Address of Property in Question: % -_ Legal description' of. property in question: _ Reason for Redues t �j �t3 F - � i�c" /= /e c ,•.� ���n`, '.4 J R f�l � �• � �J:� � v}t-cry --- " © Present zoning of property: Present use of property: -24- VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. V . CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEP'IN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST -� Date of Application Fee Paid Date Received byA lye . yti.me Phone #� - pp scant jJ Name: �F- Last First initial Address: f Number and Street City State Zip Code Name:_ ��/C Number. and Street City Address of Property in Question: Legal descri.ptioii of property .in question. State Zip Code Reason for Request: r Present zoning of property: Present use -of property: --2 4-- VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. - CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, 14INNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST - ` Date of Application Fee Paid Date Q Received by - Daytime Phoney - Applicant- l/� - Name j Last First Initial - Address: Number and Street City State Zip Code Owner' cj G ` // + -', I,luznber and Street City State Zip Code Address of Property ioi Question: Legal description- of- property i11 question: Reason. or 1 ecjues t : Present zoning of property: Present use of property: - CITY OF CHANHASSEN NOTICE OF HEARING. BEE -ORE THE BOARD_ OF ADJUSTMENTS -AND APPEALS An appeal has been filed with the Zoning Administrator for a variance to Zoning Ordinance 47, Section 19.16 entitled Outside Storage in a Residential District. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals will conduct a hearing on this appeal on Tuesday, May 30, 1978 at the residences listed below., The approximate time the Board will arrive at each residence is also listed. Jerald Heydt, 6725 Iroquois Gordon Tock, 6598 Huron Ave.. Jerry Boucher, 1042 West 67th Street Ralph Livingston, 2631 Orchard Lane Frank Scott, Jr., 2730 Sandpiper Trail L. W. Hagen, 6300 Cypress Drive Lorin Neske, 6221 Dogwood Keith Arntsen, 6320 Elm Tree Ave. Morris Mullin, 3451 Shore Drive Richard Krueger, 3901 Leslee Curve Wesley Searles, 3841 Red Cedar Point Alfred Smith, 3714 Hickory 6:35 p.m. 6:50 p.m. 7:05 p.m. 7:25 p.m. 7:40 p.m. 7:55 p.m. 8:15 p.m. 8:30 p.m. 8:45 p.m. 9:00 P.M. 9:15 p.m. 9:30 p.m. All interested persons may appear and be heard at said time and place. - -24- VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSI ERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application. /o Fee Paid Date Received by - Daytime Phone APpl cant: Name: y/9 T—�i/�� -. Last First Initial Address: .2 0C�41ai s j ��c}�� it Number and. Street City State Zip Code Owner 7 Name, AITA4.0 Number, and Street City State Address of Property in Question:. Legal description of- property in question: Reason for Request: Present zoning of property: �) Present use of property: �'"/ Zip Code -24- VARIANCE PETITION CITY OF CHANHASSEN CASE NO. VAR. CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION.FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application Fee Paid Date Received by Applicant: IV ame : Last Address: ; Number and Street Daytime "hone41 First Initial Cit State Zip Code Owner Name: / (� Number. and S r et Ci St 6 to Zip Code Address of Property in Question: A.- iq .% 1 t 1 14.11 1 F A/ ! fd Legal description' of_ property in question: Reason for Request: = ua-A-k-zurLu, aAf( 6, Present zoning of property: Present use of property:__ r) -, STATE COPY FOR TAX CREDIT FILING PURPOSES ONLY MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO:- 1 r- + uz r'. DONALD F. DAHLKE, COUNTY TREASURER STATEMENT FOR REAL -ESTATE -TAXES — PAYABLE 1977 :f. - Treasurer's Office, Carver County, Minn Chaska, Minnesota 55318' £• �'r;� SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ... ' -•-.. 1 3x},x.- f y... ea;,. INCLUDED IN TOTAL TAX - Sec. Twp. ', Sch. Dirt. .or or., Rng- ACRES -. 1 "' g, ., t'Lot ,Block - i • €=�' • 0. TO ' : .. .}}.yy ..:.t�y�sffK�.. �, :� 7 Yt_u4...c _ � S. '�, 5. -�! �' •t3..sc 1 �lx-s,:�,a�'• - i KY.#At• 'i,ja x•f �''-k� 1 "� i` 'K .. f"t 4`�i �.1e ii �i{ �y�v' y .'..l(� R.:+ *.� Ad':h -f.t a+K ` „�1tfp-F �t',t,iM�..e''4,e �i.i _ �2�L6�+�� � �..): i' � �+i �%v..• ' x (� i CODE FOR SPECIALS: _ x , t. -sue '�fi '� t� -.z. 1i SEWER Z.: WATER' - .: }'�µ`=-° J...:.s' s4 s+=.; r stt•.- z 1 -. ,3. SEWERAND WATER 4.: CURB AND GUTTER a 5:. STREET IMPROVEMENT 1s 6. STORM SEWER 7. MISC. UT CHANGE OF ADDRESS HERE, „ESTIMATED MARKET -)_ "LIMITED MARKET f- ^ASSESSED VALUE�� ..VALUE-. VALUE -: SECTION C — GROSS TAX DISTRIBUTION - STATE TAX CREDIT FILING INFORMATION ' (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON -BACK) - SECTION A INCOME'ADJUSTED HOMESTEAD CREDIT-` If you qualify for this credit use the amounts below to complete Form M-IHC. 1. .Iifying Tax Amount Limited to dwelling and oneacre adjoining land - (120 acres if Farm). _ 2. State Paid Homestead Credit :' y 3. No Delinquent Taxes Unless Box' is checked ..... SECTION B SENIOR CITIZENS SPECIAL.PROPERTY TAX CREDIT If you qualify for this credit use the amounts below to complete Form M-IHC. . - =c s000.00 7_::County ._.. ..- 8 ,Township or City 9 -:School District` . - 10 A Other Taxing Districts r y 1 y B Fiscal Disparities' ... 11.;`-TOTAL GROSS TAX: _ r, 12:--REDUCTIONS: - '.:A. State Paid Agricultural Aid Credit . B., _State Paid Homestead Credit 13. `TOTAL TAX 14...Special Assessments .' 15. TOTAL AMOUNT PAYABLE ` '- x A FIRST HALF INSTALLMENT 4. Base Year ��` Base Year Tax E; SEC. HALF INSTALLMENT } TPENALTY x x 5. Current Year Tax T TOTAL COUNTY TREASURER ° +"- ,` •"' �' - EE REVERSE SIDE } �kf.�_`=a' ... .. x. ,.:. -24- 7--051' VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST "ao""e Date of Application Fee Paid Date Received by Applicant: Daytime Phone Name: sRC�'`l — - — Last First Initial Address: /oya HIA, V- Number and Street City State Zip Code Owner Name. _ SQ I" I f_ A S A8©tlr-- Number. and Street City State Zip Code Address of Property in Question: Legal description of property in question: .P"r.E We. y74do 12 pla 319 Sao &ARvee Reason for Request: .�,t,�..i,� �crr�y�n ('itUs,�' � uts i,u 7k �. �•�rrl�l t �!� � �.�.�.ss ,�_E'�r, �o.��r v.4� r.L�---. Wri.,72 P 'k&.eaar,6 de 7o GEr A ,� 4- X e'r Du'e no s"" ,Et/EiV IF 7AF ee Gt a e& A -le T/PL�Irs . Present zoning of property: )E5S1,QEA 774L Present use of property;- ,RES/DFaUeE _ VARIANCE PETITION -24-- .; CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application Fee Paid Date Received b Daytime Ph e Applicant: --� Name.L i �/ i ti4 ( .. �: `� l t Last First I itial Address: Z�f> 't .claV41 C e-LS1.�` Number and Street City State Zip Code Owner T- Name: IJumber- and Street City State Zip Code Address of Property in Question: C c C_.�; t z� �'� � / ,K)AJ. Legal description- of property in question: Reason . for Reaues t : Present zoning of property: Present use of property: -24- VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST 0_ A Date of Application Fee Paid Date` 1 Received by -- - - -_- 1 Daytime Phone # Ll 7 q _ - Applicant - Name : Is (2.-P$C Last First Initial Address: a73(D 5AINPT P�_e JR- C%iAA)1*5Stkf Jj%Al'j Number and Street City State Zip Code Owner A Name:.Number. and Street City State Zip Code Address of Property in Question: :/QM — Legal description of property in question: Reason for Reques t OREA& - �aP,7164 of L[i�, � � S LcsG 51Pl4' � Present zoning of property: �y�'S/� c4l1 I% ,4 Present use of property: /� �� ��4L) #4 --24- VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application " Fee Paid Date Received by Applicant Daytime Phone � Name 7 �(/ I �'1 sry Last — -- - -- First - - initial Address: Number and S'• et City State Zip Code Owner �, Name: 50' n Number and Street City State Zip Code Address of Property in Question: 5CL Legal description -of property in question: Reason for Reques t : T4A ),Ayy�� (0-ILJ"AA U v a C� Z3 �rn _ t Present zoning of property: --% Present use of property:.�` 3 VARIANCE PETITION � /� r _24_ CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN; CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR C IDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Q pate of Application Fee Paid Date r,�.. ' ! �,,..r. Received- c Daytime Phone #� APP - icant : Name: .S / � 0 1 1 Yl Last ! First Initial Address: to fy a s t )'t Number and Street City State Zip Code Owner /" �S �"�- > Name: PQ bi a 'I SS�c f - Number.and Street City State uip Cone Address of Property in Question: � r �«J c3 CT Legal description' of property in question: Reason . for Request: rO 'r )33 Present Zoning of property:% Present use of property:- __ VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST • Date of Application Fee Paid. Date Received by Daytime Phone 0 Applicant:_j Name: /q r vt I S e P1 Last First Initial Address: � 2-� �rvi �Y X� /r//�6'1 A Number and Street City State Zip Code Owner Name: Number and Street City State Zip Code Address of Property in Question: Legal es- Legal description of property in question: Reason for Request: Present zoning of property: -1 Present use' of property -24- VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. CITY. OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application 12- Fee Paid Date Received by Da time Phone Applicant: Name: Last First Initial Address: S Number and Street City State Zip Code Owner Name: Number and Street City State Zip Code Address of Property in Question: Legal description of property in question: Present zoning of property: Present use of property:_ - 2 4 _. ax 1141lyd State Zip Code I S'�" 1' zip Code VARIANCE PETITION CITY OF CHANHASS CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUN APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION O Applicant: _ .Name; Address: 0 E S L EF (uIC2t`i--C Number and Street Owner Name • `� 4?4 / L cS L t L- CASE NO. VAR. EN TIES, MINNESOTA F PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application Fee Paid Date Received by Daytime Phone # First Initial M/A11 ty State Number and Street C.1ty -Address of Property in Question: b`z L=K CcL.a f"4 Legal description of property in question: ,Reason for Request: -- 2 4-- VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN - CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application • Fee Paid Date ✓tit Received by . Daytime Phone #� `i%�/• Applicant: - Name: Se 5nrle s- - ��' of S %e V Last First Initial, Address: 3841— e d l`txd&— P?. IV Ael hio1. 1 Number and Street City ' State Zip Code Owner / Name: ���xtP. '3 e) eve - Number and Street City State Zip Code Address of Property in Question: 3 ty 4/ Ale d et-J4i-- Pt INC. - C� C e trio Alit, Legal description -of property in question: iv Reason for lteques t : v �yZ o.. o . Present zoning of property:,-� Present use of property:_ VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Date of Application Fee Paid Date Received by Daytime Phone D Applicant: Name:�T�\ Last First Initial Address: 3>gtA7 `�� ��-�yoPO ��_' s_ Number and Street City State Zip Code Owner Name: Number and Street City State Zip Code Address of Property in Question: Legal description of property in question: Reason for Request: . Present zoning of property: Present use of property: -`I -