77-25 Variance 9015 Lake Riley Blvd Scanned Planning File70)
CITY OF -y
CHANHASSEN
7610 LAREDO DRIVE*P.O. BOX 147*CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
PLANNING REPORT
DATE: February 27, 1978
TO: City Manager, Don Ashworth
FROM: Assistant City Planner, Bob Waibel
SUBJ: Variance Request for 9015 Lake Riley Blvd.
PLANNING CAS(: P-462
APPLICANT: Benjamin E. Swenson
Petition:
Action by Council:
Endar€d__
I"', v'O'il irhl
Rejee�ed
Date 3/Ghd'
Cc.�"�
�C � l-Q.N � � /✓I�nw
Mr. Swenson is proposing to construct a house on the subject property
and for which the following variances are required: Lot area require-
ments, front footage requirements and high water setback requirements.
Background
1. Community Location: As indicated in Enclosure 1, the subject
property is located on Lake Riley, approximately 130 feet south of
the intersection of Lake Riley Blvd., and Lyman Blvd.
2. Existing Zoning: The subject property is zoned R-1, Single Family
Residential. The properties immediately West of the subject property
are zoned R-lA, Agricultural Residence District. Within the requirements
of the R-1 district and the Shoreland Management Ordinance, the
following criteria are applicable to the petitioners request:
a). 90 feet of frontage on the public street is required,
whereas 84 feet exists.
b). 20,000 square feet of lot area is required for sewered
areas on Lake Riley, whereas 11,675 is in existence.
c). A 75 foot high water setback is required, whereas approixmately
40 feet is proposed.
3. Utilities: Sanitary sewer is presently being installed to the
subject property and its environs. Municipal water service is presently
unavailable to the subject property.
Mr. Don Ashworth 1 -2- February 27, 1978
4. Comprehensive Plan Proposals:
a). Land Use: Pursuant to the adopted
property is to assume a low density, single
identity upon the installation of sanitary
Planner's Comments
city plan, the subject
family residential
sewer.
1. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the
Council shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts:
a). That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting
the land, building or use referred to in the application for the
variance.
b). That the granting of the variance is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights.
c). That the granting of the application will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the area
adjacent to the property for which the variance is sought.
d). That the granting of the variance will be in keeping with
the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance and city plan.
The Board of Adjustments and Appeals in recommending, and the Council
in granting a variance may impose conditions to insure compliance and
to protect adjacent properties. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals
and the council shall not permit as a variance any use that is not
permitted under this ordinance for property in the zoning district
where the land which is the subject of the variance application is
located.
2. In the feasibility study of the Lake Riley improvement project,
it was anticipated that the subject property would be assessed as a
developable parcel.
3. As part of the Lake Riley improvement project, Lake Riley Blvd.
was relocated and reconstructed in the vicinity of the subject property.
The new alignment of Lake Riley Blvd., as indicated in enclosure 2,
has reverted an additional linear distance of 18 feet of the south
property line and 13 feet to the north property line of the subject
property.
4. There exists several trees adjacent to the front facing of the
proposed structure which served as a buffer between the previous
Lake Riley Blvd. right of way and the cabin presently on the property.
It is the desire of the petitioner to carry out his development plans
building towards the lake rather than towards the road in order to
retain these trees. Also, the front yard setbacks proposed for the new
house will place the new house in alignment with the structures on
the adjoining parcels.
5. The subject property is a metes and bounds lot of record prior
to the adoption of Zoning Ordinance 47 and the Shoreland Management
Ordinance and Ordinance 33.
Mr. Don Ashworth -3- "7 February 27, 1978
6. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals has voted to recommend that
the City Council look with favor upon this request.
7. Since the Board of Adjustments and Appeals decision, I have discussed
this case with Steve Preston of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
Mr. Preston indicated to me that the DNR uses the suspended second
story deck for the reference point to high water, making the high water
variance request 34 feet, placing the outer edge of the deck 40 feet
from the high water mark. Mr. Preston mentioned their office has no
objections to the request as proposed.
8. Additionally, since the Board of Adjustments and Appeals decision,
it was brought to my attention that a building permit could be issued
at this time, pending council approval, because of iminent completion
of the Lake Riley sewer project, however, occupancy should not occur
until said sewer is operative.
Planner's Recommendation
I recommend that the city council look with favor upon this request
for the following grounds and conditions:
1. That the subject property was a lot of record previous to the
adoption of ordinance 47 and the Shoreland Management Ordinance.
2. Pursuant to the Lake Riley improvement project feasibility study,
the subject property will in all likelihood receive a sewer unit
assessment.
3. That the 35 foot high water variance request is a reasonable request
to allow for the retention of the trees mentioned in this report.
4. There are unique problems associated with the depth of this lot
relative to the requirements of the high water setback, the location of
the trees, and the present front yard setbacks of the structures on
the adjoining properties.
5. That no occupancy be permitted until the sewer is operative.
uu' /
Action by City Administrator
Endorsed ✓
Modified
Rejected
Date SubmiYod to Commission
Date Submitted to Council
'3/ 6 /7 &
777'77
f4
MJ
IPA
Jf
7
t
Lla
I
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS
DECEMBER 20, 1977
1 Johnson, Dick Pearson and Roman Roos Present.
Varianc equest - James B. Setzer -.00
Dick Pearson moved o ner's recomme tion that City Council
grant variance, if within e uirement of Shoreline
Management Act and no occupan sewer is in operation.
Seconded by Roman Roos. voted in fav their property
Variance Request - Benjamin E. Swenson
Roman Roos recommended to City Council to grant variance following
planner's recommendation subject to completion of sewer to property
and to conformance of the Shoreline Management Standards. Seconded
by Will Johnson. All voted in favor. No other property owners
present.
Meeting adjourned 8:00 p.m.
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7610 LAREDO DRIVE 0P.O. BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINN ESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
December 21, 1977
Mr. William B. Nye
Commissioner of Natural Resources
3rd Floor Centennial Office Building
658 Cedar Street
St. Paul, MN 55155
Dear Mr. Nye:
Enclosed are copies of the two planner's reports for variance requests
to the Shoreland Management Ordinance on Lake Riley in Chanhassen. In-
advertently, the notices of public hearing forehearings to be held on
December 20, 1977, were not forwarded to your office. In view of this,
we are sending you our reports and will await your comments until Wed-
nesday, January 4, 1978.
In addition to the conditions and grounds for approval in the Planner's
Recommendation portion of the report, the following contingencies of
approval have been placed on these requests by the Board of Adjustments
and Appeals:
a). That approval not be granted until January 4, 1978 in anticipation of
comments from the Department of Natural Resources.
b). That occupancy of the subject property is prohibited until the Lake
Riley sewer system is operative.
Sincerely,
Robert Waibel
Assistant City Planner
lap
Enclosure
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O, BOX 1479CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612)474-8885
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Adjustments and Appeals
FROM: Assistant City Planner, Bob Waibel
DATE: December 19, 1977
SUBJ: Enclosed Planning Reports
The enclosed reports are my initial draft of the two cases scheduled
for tomorrow evenings hearings. I have sent these initial drafts
so that you may be better informed as to the salient information
involved in these cases. I have several revisions and additions
to be made for the final draft. The final draft will be available
tomorrow evening.
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7610 LAREDO DRIVEoP.O. BOX 147oCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
PLANNING REPORT
DATE: December 19, 1977
TO: Board of Adjustments and Appeals
FROM: Assistant City Planner, Bob Waibel
SUBJ: Variance Request for 9015 Lake Riley Blvd.
PLANNING CASE: P-462
APPLICANT: Benjamin E. Swenson
Petition
Mr. Swenson is proposing to construct a house on the subject property
and for which the following variances are required: Lot area require-
ments, front footage requirements and high water setback requirements.
Background
1. Community Location: As indicated in Enclosure 1, the subject
property is located on Lake Riley, approximately 130 feet south of
the intersection of Lake Riley Blvd., and Lyman Blvd.
2. Existing Zoning: The subject property is zoned R-1, Single
Family Residential. The properties immediately West of the subject
property are zoned R-lA, Agricultural Residence District. Within
the requirements of the R-1 district and the Shoreland Management
Ordinance, the following criteria are applicable to the petitioners
request:
a). 90 feet of frontage on the public street is required,
whereas 84 feet exists.
b). 20,000 square feet of lot area is required for sewered
areas on Lake Riley, whereas 11,675 is in existence.
c). A 75 foot high water setback is required, whereas approximately
51 feet is proposed.
3. Utilities: Sanitary sewer is presently being installed to the subject
property and its environs. Municipal water service presently is
unavailable to the subject property.
Mayor and Council -2- December 19, 1977
4. Comprehensive Plan Proposals:
a). Land Use: Pursuant to the adopted city plan, the subject
property is to assume a low density, single family residential
identity upon the installation of sanitary sewer.
Planner's Comments
1. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the
Council shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts:
a). That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting
the land, building or use referred to in the application for the
variance.
b). That the granting of the variance is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights.
c). That the granting of the application will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the area
adjacent to the property for which the variance is sought.
d). That the granting of the variance will be in keeping with
the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance and city plan.
The Board of Adjustments and Appeals in recommending, and the Council
in granting a variance may impose conditions to insure compliance and
to protect adjacent properties. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals
and the council shall not permit as a variance any use that is not
permitted under this ordinance for property in the zoning district
where the land which is the subject of the variance application is
located.
2. In the feasibility study of the Lake Riley improvement project,
it was anticipated that the subject property would be assessed as a
developable parcel.
3. As part of the Lake Riley improvement project, Lake Riley Blvd,
was relocated and reconstructed in the vicinity of the subject property.
The new alignment of Lake Riley Blvd., as indicated in enclosure 2,
has reverted an additional linear distance of 18 feet to the south
property line and 13 feet to the north property line of the subject
property.
4. There exists a stand of trees adjacent to the front facing of the
proposed structure which served as a buffer between the previous
Lake Riley Blvd. right of way and the cabin presently on the property.
It is the desire of the petitioner to carry out his development plans
building towards the lake rather than towards the road in order to
retain the said strand of trees.
5. The subject property is a metes and bounds lot of record prior
to the adoption of Zoning Ordinance 47 and the Shoreland Management
Ordinance and ordinance 33.
Board of Adjustment_
and Appeals -3- December 19, 1977
Planner's Recommendation
I recommend that the Board of Adjustments and Appeals look with favor
upon this request for the following grounds and conditions:
1. That the subject property was a lot of record previous to the adoption
of Ordinance 47 and the Shoreland Management Ordinance.
2. Pursuant to the Lake Riley improvement project feasibility study,
the subject property will in all likelihood receive a sewer unit
assessment.
3. That the 24 foot high water variance request is a reasonable request
to allow for the retention of the trees mentioned in this report.
4. There are unique problems associated with the depth of this lot
relative to the requirements of the high water setback and the location
of the trees.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS
DECEMBER 20, 1977
Will Johnson, Dick Pearson and Roman Roos Present.
Variance Request - James B. Setzer
Dick Pearson moved on planner's recommendation that City Council
grant variance, if within variance requirement of Shoreline
Management Act and no occupancy till city sewer is in operation.
Seconded by Roman Roos. All voted in favor. No other property
owners present.
Variance Request - Benjamin E. Swenson
Roman Roos recommended to City Council to grant variance following
planner's recommendation subject to completion of sewer to property
and to conformance of the Shoreline Management Standards. Seconded
by Will Johnson. All voted in favor. No other property owners
present.
Meeting adjourned 8:00 p.m.
66.
I
CITY OF
N
7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O. BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474-8885
PLANNING REPORT
DATE: December 19, 1977
TO: Board of Adjustments and Appeals
FROM: Assistant City Planner, Bob Waibel
SUBJ: Variance request for 9015 Lake Riley Blvd.
PLANNING CASE: P-462
APPLICANT: Benjamin E. Swenson
Petition
Mr. Swenson is proposing to construct a house on the subject property
and for which the following variances are required: Lot area require-
ments, front footage requirements and high water setback requirements.
Background
1. Community Location: As indicated in Enclosure 1, the subject
property is located on Lake Riley, approximately 130 feet South of
the intersection of Lake Riley Blvd., and Lyman Blvd.
2. Existing Zoning: The subject property is zoned R-1, Single
Family Residential. The properties immediately West of the subject
property are zoned R-lA, Agricultural Residence District. within
the requirements of the R-1 district and the Shoreland Management
Ordinance, the following criteria are applicable to the petitioners
request:
a). 90 feet of frontage on the public street is requiree.,,
whereas 84 feet exists.
b). 20,000 square feet of lot area is required for sewered
areas on Lake Riley, whereas 11,675 is in existence.
c). A 75 foot high water setback is required, whereas approximately
51 feet is proposed.
3. Utilities: Sanitary sewer is presently being installed to the subject
property and its .2virons. Municipal water service presently is
unavailable to `_'.^ subject property.
'1
Mayor and Council
-2-
December 19, 1977
4. Comprehensive Plan Proposals:
a). Land Use: Pursuant to the adopted city plan, the subject
property is to assume a low density, single family residential
identity upon the installati .n, if, anitary brewer.
b�l f/U�'Sl/ v�? 77ltY
Ius��7, sofa /
'.
Planner's ommentts
1. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the
Council shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts:
a). That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting
the land, building or use referred to in the application for the
variance.
b). That the granting of the variance is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights.
c). That the granting of the application will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the area
adjacent to the property for which the variance is sought.
d). That the granting of the variance will be in keeping with
the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance and city plan.
The Board of Adjustments and Appeals in recommending, and the Council
in granting a variance may impose conditions to insure compliance and
to protect adjacent properties. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals
and the council shall not permit as a variance any use that is not
permitted under this ordinance for property in the zoning district
where the land which is the subject of the variance application is
located.
2. In the feasibility study of the Lake Riley improvement project,
it was anticipated that the subject property would be assessed as a
developable parcel.
3. As part of the Lake Riley improvement project, Lake Riley Blvd,
was relocated and reconstructed in the vicinity of the subject property.
The new alignment of Lake Riley Blvd., as indicated in enclosure 2,
has reverted an additional linear distance of 18 feet to the south
property line and 13 feet to the north property line of the subject
property.
4. There exists a stand of trees adjacent to the front facing of the
proposed structure which served as a buffer between the previous
Lake Riley Blvd. right of way and the cabin presently on the property.
It is the desire of the petitioner to carry out his development plans
building towards the lake rather than towards the road in order to
retain the said strand of trees.
5. The subject property is a metes and bounds lot of record prior
to the adoption of Zoning Ordinance 47 and the Shoreland Management
Ordinance and Ordinance 33.
Board of Adjustment.
and Appeals -3- December 1.9, 1977
Planner's Recommendation
I recommend that the Board of Adjustments and Appeals look with favor
upon this request for the following grounds and conditions:
1. That the subject property was a lot of record previous to he adoption
of Ordinance 47 and the Shoreland Management Ordinance. tt,J ti a+uti. 3 3
2. Pursuant to the Lake Riley improvement project feasibility study,
the subject property will in all likelihood receive a sewer unit
assessment.
3. That the 24 foot high water variance request is a reasonable request
to allow for the retention of the trees mentioned in this report.
4. There are unique problems associated with the depth of this lot
relative to the requirements of the high water setback and the location
of the trees.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE OF HEARING
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF CARVER )
Don Ashworth being first duly sworn, on oath deposes
and says that he is and was on December 9 19 77 the duly qualified and
acting City Clerk -Administrator of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said
date he caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of hearing on a
Variance Request for Benjamin E. Swenson
in the
City to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said
notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes
addressed to all such owners in the United States mails with postage fully prepaid
thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such
by the records of the County Treasurer of Carver County, Minnesota, and by other
appropriate records.
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this day of
Notary Public
1<1L /
Don Ashworth
City Manager
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
NOTICE OF HEARING BEFORE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS
An appeal has been filed with the Zoning Administrator for
a variance of Zoning Ordinance No. 47. The Board of Adjustments
and Appeals will conduct a hearing on this appeal on Tuesday
December 20, 1977 at 7:30 p.m. at City Hall, 7610 Laredo Drive.
All interested persons may appear and be heard at said time and
place.
APPLICANT: Mr. Benjamin E. Swenson
PLANS: Mr. Swenson plans to construct a house on a parcel of land on
LAke Riley, approximately 280 feet north of the Shore Acres Addition.
The subject property contains approximately 11,675 square feet and
has approximately 84 feet of frontage on Riley Lake Blvd. The high-
water setback for the proposed house is approximately 52 feet. Chan-
hassen Zoning Ordinance #47 requires 90 feet of frontage on a public
street and the Municipal Shoreland Management Ordinance requires lot
areas of 20,000 square feet and highwater setbacks of 75 feet.
Robert Rogers
4917 Diane Drive
Minnetonka, MN 55343
Richard Eide
8910 Riley Lake
Chaska, MN 55318
Edward Siebenaler
322 E. 5th St.
Shakopee, MN 55379
Benjamin Swenson
74 Judith Drive
Chaska, MN 55318
Ernest Bugard
Rt. 3 Box 481
Mound, MN 55364:
John Skranka
9021 Lake Riley Blvd.
Chaska, MN 55318
�a
r 1
� m �
Z fI.
U
7
h .
r
I L
+r bk, ". L.
a..
.,.
�6 w:�'; '_'��"yq�',5i�a4�
¢e �,..N�
w<!Y➢s,. . r."A,,,y
- -
i
it
�
�,i
�•,i
�,
I,
i
�`�
I
�
�
\L.
I
L
,
r4
I
W
�
`ice' �
•�, .:: c''�,
..._,
, '
>
Y
IL
L
y
Y
••
.la'Lt Z
tut this #a 11 correct PW of a sur"y
by r*,
-W�
CHAPTER THREE
VARIANCE PETITION
-20-
VARIANCE PETITION
CHRONOLOGY
Introduction:
The purpose of granting a "Variance" is to provide relief
from the strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance
and impost conditions and safeguards where there are practical
difficulties or particular hardships.
Step-by-step Procedure for Processing an Application Involving
a Variance Request. (Ref. Ordinance 47, Section 22.04).
Step 1. PETITIONER.
Initial Information. All applications for variance shall be
filed in the office of the Zoning Administrator and shall be
accompanied by ten (10) copies of a set of plans and graphics
containing the following information:
a. Sketch Plan showing all pertinent dimensions having an
influence upon the Variance Request.
b. If topography or extreme grade is the basis on which the
request is made, topographic contours at two (2) foot intervals shall
be submitted.
C. An Abstractor's Certificate showing the names and addresses
of all property owners within three hundred fifty (350) feet of the
property in question.
d. Pays required filing fee.
Step 2. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR.
a. Reviews documents submitted in Step 1 above, and requests
any missing information from petitioner.
b. Forwards copies of the petition to other staff members or
governmental agencies deemed appropriate at least fourteen (14)
days prior to the Board of Adjustments and Appeals meeting.
c. Sets date for public hearing within thirty (30) days after
filing for variance.
d. Notified Board of Adjustments and Appeals and adjacent
property owners of forthcoming public hearing. Said notice of
public hearing shall be mailed not less than ten (10) days prior
to the date of public hearing.
ri
-21-
Prepares Planning Report which includes comments from other
staff and forwards copies to Board of Adjustments and Appeals and
petitioner no later than Friday prior to the scheduled public hearing.
Step 3. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS.
a. Reviews documents and reports submitted in Step 1 and
2 above.
b. Hears petitioner's formal presentation of the proposed
variance.
c. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend,
and the Council shall not grant, a variance unless they find the
following facts:
1) That there are special circumstances or conditions
affecting the land, building or use referred to in the application
for the variance.
2) That the granting of the variance is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights.
3) That the granting of the application will not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property
in the area adjacent to the property for which the variance is
sought.
4) That the granting of the variance will be in keeping
with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and City Plan.
The Board of Adjustments and Appeals in recommending,
and the Council in granting, a variance may impose conditions to
insure compliance and to protect adjacent properties. The Board
of Adjustments and Appeals and the Council shall not permit as a
variance any use that is not permitted under this ordinance for
property in the zoning district where the land which is the subject
of the variance application is located.
Step 4. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR.
a. Forwards copy of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals
recommendation to the City Council.
Step 5. CITY COUNCIL.
a. The Council shall review, and may revise or reverse, any
decision of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. In reviewing
such decisions the Council may conduct such hearings as it may
deem advisable and shall prescribe what notice, if any, shall
be given of such hearings. The Council shall conduct its review
of any such decision and make its findings and order thereon
within 60 days after receipt by it of the decision of the Board
of Adjustments and Appeals. No permit for a variance shall be
issued unless a decision of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals
approving the same is reviewed and approved by the Council.
-22-
b. Denial. Variances may be denied by the Council and such
denial shall -co —constitute a finding and determination that the conditions
required for approval do not exist. No application for a variance
which has been denied wholly or in part shall be resubmitted for
a period os six (6) months from the date of such order of denial,
except on grounds of new evidence or proof of change of conditions
found to be valid by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals.
C. Action Without Decision. If no decision is transmitted
by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals within sixty (60) days
after referral of the appeal or application for variance to the
Board, the Council may take action without further awaiting such
decision.
r•
I:
-23-
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM ENTITLED:
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST, VARIANCE PETITION.
(Note: This instruction sheet should be given to each applicant
petitioning for a variance.)
1. The applicant should become familiar with the provisions
setforth in Ordinance 47 as amended entitled "Chanhassen Zoning
Ordinance", and the City Administrative Procedures Manual.
2. If the applicant is requesting a multiple request, such as a
variance which may also involve a rezoning or conditional use
permit, separate forms must be filled out for each request.
3. Case No., fee paid and date will be filled out by the
Administrator, or any other authorized person charged with accepting
forms for the Planning Commission.
4. Applicant refers to the person actually submitting the form,
if different than owner. If applicant is also the owner, write
"same" after "name". Address refers to the applicants mailing address.
5. Owner refers to the actual person holding title to the property
in question; it does not refer to a contract buyer; renter, or
lessee. Address refers to the owners mailing address.
6. Address of property in question refers to subject property
street name and number. If the property is undeveloped, the address
may be obtained from the City Building Inspector.
7. Legal Description of property in question refers to the lot
number, block number and name of subdivision, or if unplatted, the
meets and bounds description or registered land survey as recorded
of the subject property. This information may be obtained from the
Carver County Register of Deeds, located in the County Courthouse,
Chaska, Minnesota.
8. Present zoning of property refers to the specific zoning district
in which the property is located.
9. Present use of property refers to the existing land use, i.e.,
single family residential, office building, agriculture, etc.
10. Proposed use of property refers to the specific improvement
intended for the property in questions.
11. Documents attached are required by City Ordinance 47, Section 22.
12. The remaining portion of the application is for administrative
use.
-24,
VARIANCE PETITION CASE NO. VAR.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST
Date of Application
Fee Paid Date
ReceivedTy
Applicant:
Name: SWENSON BENJAMIN E.
Last First Initial
Address: 74 Judith Drive Chaska Minnesota 55318
Nnmhar Antl G+raor n4 �., os. i.. o._ !._a_
Owner
Name: Same
Last First Initial
Address:
Number and Street City State Zap Code
Address of Property in question:
9015 Lake Riley Blvd.
Legal description of property in question:
The Sly 84 ft. off of the following described 1�� to wit: Starting at a point on the quarter
line of Section 24-116-23, Carver County, Minnesota 2624 feet East of the Northwest Corner of
the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section where this line strikes the
West Shore of Riley's Lake and running thence West along said Quarter line of said Section 24,
128 feet thence South 160 40' West 224; thence East 122 feet to the Shore of Riley's Lake;
thence North along the Shore of Riley's Lake to the place of the beginning containing 22/100
acre, more or less.
Present zoning of property:
Present use of property: summer cabin
Proposed use of property: __ residence
-25-
The following documents shall be attached to this application:
Date Received Initial
1. Sketch Plan
2. Abstractors Certificate
3. Fee Paid
I hereby declare that all statements made in this application and on
the attached documents are true, and that I shall reimburse the City
of Chanhassen for all City expenses incurred in processing this.
//,V- k, % %
d Date
Receiveby
Title
(Following to be completed by Zoning Administrator or City official)
Z&A r
/2-)(l ?
Direx
---------- ----- --
ICI
I