The URL can be used to link to this page

75-02 - Laredo Ln PUD pt 1June 3, 1977 CITY (w`-� �BAN9--ASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE*P.O. BOX 470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (6 1 2, 474-8885 Fop Mr. Thomas Klingelhutz Hansen and R14ngelhutz 516 Del Rio Drive Chanhassen, MN 35317 Dear Tc.,:m* It is m"v understanding that both Bruce and Bill have talked to you in t^ ?-he intersection of Laredo Tare and Laredo Drive. As notE -n Brezinsky's letter :.ttached) "removal o-1- the berm a , - .b -nt_.ngs adjacent to Lot 21 -(-,-th) will be necess -�-y . , 11. Tt is my understanding 1 .,.az a have stated :ha:. you Will- complete this work. Sinter y, Don Ashworth City Manager DA:k Attac'r.,me t ccSchoell and Madson Planner WILLIAM D. SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON JACK T. VOSLER DAMES R. ORR HAROLD E. DAHLIN LARRY L. HANSON RAYMOND J. JACKSON WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY JACK E_ GILL THEODORE D. KEMNA JOHN W. EMOND KENNETH E. ADOLF DANIEL R. BOXRUD WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT '-� SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC. ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS (612) 938-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA .55343 OFFICES AT HURON. SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON, TEXAS May 31, 1977 City of Chanhassen c/o Mr. Don Ashworth, City Manager: Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Subject: Laredo Lane -Laredo Drive Intersection Gentlemen: We inspected the subject intersection because of several complaints as to sight distance when entering Laredo Drive from Laredo Lane. A three-way stop is not justified; however, improvement of the sight dis- tance south of Laredo Lane is recommended. According to the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices", a multi -way (in this case three-way) stop is, in general, warranted only where the volume of traffic in intersecting roads is approximately equal, or where an accident problem occurs as indicated by five or more reported accidents within a 12-month period that could be corrected by a multi -way stop. Neither of these.conditionv met at this intersection. The required sight distance on arterial streets.for a passenger vehicle stopped at a minor cross street is 0�) fee for each 10 miles per hour speed limit. In this case, 300 feet should be provided. This distance is available to the northeast., However, removal of the berm and plantings adjacent to Lot 21 (to the so`. h -rill be necessary to obtain 300 feet in that direction. We recommend removal of the berm and plantings to the south as needed to provide the required sight distance, Very truly yours, SCHOELL F. ?SOD, INC. i WjBrezinsky:sg RUSSELL H. LARSON CRAIG M. MERTZ RUSSELL H. L&RSON ATTORNEY AT LAW 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA SS402 October 18, 1976 Mr. Donald W. Ashworth City Administrator Box 147 Chanhassen, :Minnesota 55317 Dear Don: AREA CODE 612 TELEPHONE 335-9565 Re: Laredo Lane Planned Residential Development Contract Enclosed are several copies of the second amendment to the Planned Residential Development Contract for Laredo Lane. If you find this to be in order, please arrange to have it signed by all parties. I.f you have any questions or wish to make any revisions, please do not hesita.te'to call me. RHL:mep Enc1. /_1 verytrul oursL RUSSELL H. LARSON Chanhassen City Attorney ..z, ..._. 40 VIL„ALG{ig1/o = r �� rM NN. W CITY OF CHANHASSEN SECOND AMENDMENT PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT LAREDO LANE It is hereby agreed this 4th day of October, 1976, by and between the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, herein- after referred to as the City, and Hansen & Klingelhutz Construction, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as the Developer, that the certain Laredo Lane Planned Residential Develop- ment Contract, dated August 29, 1975, entered into between the above named parties hereby is further amended in the following particulars: 1. Paragraph 5(d) is amended to read as follows: "The Developer agrees that the cost of the installation of said facilities, shall be paid by the Developer to the City as a special assessment levied against each lot in said plat benefitted by the improvements, payable as follows: The assessment against each parcel, together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum accruing on the full amount thereof from time to time unpaid, shall be a lien concurrent with general taxes upon such parcel and all thereof. The total amount of each such assessment shall be payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of seven (7) years, the first of said installments, together with interest on the entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 1977, to be collectible with general taxes in the year 1977, and one of each of the remaining installments, together with one year's interest on that and all other unpaid installments, to be pavable with acneral taxes in each consecutive year thereafter until the entire assessment is paid. Notwithstanding the foregoing payment provisions, said assessments, as to each lot, piece or parcel of land, shall be paid in full upon the sale of said lot, piece or parcel of land, whether or not improved, or upon the occupancy of any structure erected thereon." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed on this day and year first above written. r HANSE & KL/INGELHUTZ CONSTRUCTION, By / I t s -10 21t�„ If And: __ ZZ _111146� 2zru�,/Z� Its o• INC. CITY OF CHANHASSEN F 7 By C M or Attest: , Clerk -Administrator CITY OF CHANHASSEN SECOND AMEND14ENT PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT LAREDO LANE It is hereby agreed this 4th day of October, 1976, by and between the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, herein- after referred to as the City, and Hansen & Klingelhutz Construction, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as the Developer, that the certain Laredo Lane Planned Residential Develop- ment Contract, dated August 29, 1975, entered into between the above named parties hereby is further amended in the following particulars: 1. Paragraph 5(d) is amended to read as follows: "The Developer agrees that the cost of the installation of said facilities, shall be paid by the Developer to the City as a special assessment levied against each lot in said plat benefitted by the improvements, payable as follows: The assessment against each parcel, together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum accruing on the full amount thereof from time to time unpaid, shall be a lien concurrent with general taxes upon such parcel and all thereof. The total amount of each such assessment shall be payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of seven (7) years, the first of said installments, together with interest on the entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 1977, to be collectible with general taxes in the year 1977, and one of each of the remaining installments, together with one year's interest on that and all other unpaid installments, to be payable with general taxes in each consecutive year thereafter until the entire assessment is paid. Notwithstanding the foregoing payment provisions, said assessments, as to each lot, piece or parcel of land, shall be paid in full upon the sale of said lot, piece or parcel of land, whether or not improved, or upon the occupancy of any structure erected thereon." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed on this day and year first above written. HANSE '& KLINGELHUTZ CONSTRUCTION, INC. CITY OF CHANHASSEN By I s -fix, And/ ,tL� Its By At ,,IptUT10/�/ B 1776-1976 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE4P.O. BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINN ESOTA55317a(612) 474-8885 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT LAREDO LANE AMENDMENT #1 The following are additions, deletions and changes to the original contract. 1. The last paragraph on page 1, item #c should read, "Driveway surfacing within the public street right of way." 2. Item c, under number 1 on page 2, should read, "Driveway surfacing within the public street right-of-way." 3. The first sentence on page 3 should read, "The developer further agrees that it shall commence work hereunder on or before December 1, 1975 and shall have all work done and improvements fully completed to the satisfaction and.approval of the city, on or before December 1, 1976. 4. Item d, on page 3, should read as follows: "The developer agrees that the cost of the installation of said facilities, shall be paid by the land owner to the city as a special assessment levied against the property in said plat benefitted by the improvements, in one payment, with interest at the rate of 1% per annum above the annual interest costs of temporary improvement bonds issued by the city to finance said improvements, but not to exceed 8% per annum. This payment in full shall be made and the assessments for the same, levied e Laredo Lane Development intract -2- September 8, 1975 in such a manner that the monies will be received by the city 60 days prior to the due date of the bond issue. Prepayments may be made to the city except that any payments made during the calender year which the special assessment is due and payable shall be paid to the Treasurer of Carver County." 5. On page 5, the blank on the 9th line should be filled in with "$25,000.00." The blank in the last sentence of the same paragraph should be filled in with "August 4, 1975." The following sentence should be added at the end of the same paragraph: "Such financial security as is submitted to fulfill this requirement may be reduced by the city council upon six (6) month intervals by the amount of the estimated cost of the improvement completed to city standards. Such reductions shall, however, be subject to a 10% retention which shall be held until the end of the guaranteed period." 6. Item 10b, on page 5, should read as follows: "All driveway sections lying within the public street right-of-way shall be surfaced with either portland type cement concrete or asphaltic concrete as approved by the City Engineer." 7. The second paragraph under number 10, on page 5 should be deleted in its entirety, as the bond amount in Item 9 covers these improvements. 8. Item.13, on page 6, should read: "Street Lighting. The expense of furnishing electrical energy for street lighting purposes shall be assumed by the city 24 months after the completion of installation of the street lighting system or after 75% of the building lots have been improved by the construction of residences thereon, whichever is first to occur." 9. Item 14, on page 6, should read as follows: "Replacement. All work and materials performed and furnished as an obligation of the developer as specified under paragraph 1 of this contract, or its agents and sub -contractors found by the city to be defective within one year after the acceptance by the city, shall be replaced by the developer at the developer's sole expense." 10. Item 17, on page 6, should read as follows: "Certificates of Occupancy. The developer covenants and agrees that no occupancy shall be requested, and the city shall not be required to issue any such certificates in the said plat until the city has completed the installation of the improvements set forth herein as: a) Street Grading stabilizing and bituminous surfacing, except for the final wear course, b)Surmountable concrete curbs and gutters, c) sanitary sewer mains and appurtances, Laredo Lane Development Contract -3- September 8, 1975 d) water mains and appurtances, e) improvements for storm and surface water drainage. Further, that issuance of any such certificate to the developer prior to the acceptance of said improvements, shall not constitute a waiver by the city of its rights hereunder to require completion of said improvements before issuance of additional occupancy certificates. 11. The first sentence under 18, on page 6, should read as follows: "Construction by the City. The developer agrees that the city,after finding and showing due cause, can install and construct any work or improvements required herein to be made under paragraph 1 hereto of by the developer." Barry R. Brooks Clerk -Administrator OLUTION e�C 4 �? 1776-1976 CITY OF CHANHACCEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O BOX 147*CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317o(612) 474-8885 DATE: September 5, 1975 TO: City Council FROM: Administrator SUBJ: Development Contract for Laredo Lane Addition DISCUSSION I will have a list of suggested revisions to the contract as submitted by the City Attorney,for your consideration at the meeting. These revisions constitute my recommendation. The method of assessment is a Council decision. I ask the Council not to consider the method as outlined in the original draft of the contract, no matter what bonding arrangements are made. ALTERNATIVES 1. Table for further revisions. 2. Approve the contract as originally drafted. 3. Approve with the revisions submitted by the Administrator stipulating the assessment would be paid in full at the end of a a three year bond period. 4. Approve the contract with the revisions as recommended and stipulate that the assessment will be over a seven year period with payments on the standard basis, that is seven equal yearly payments. Further, stipulating that assessments would be paid in full for each lot upon the issuance of sewer and water hook up permits. 5. Approve with the further revisions as determined by the Council and using another assessment method. RECOMMENDATION Besides recommending subject to the bond for three years wit developer to pay th issue maturity date. Barry R. Brooks Clerk -Administrator .•: h the revisions as stated, I recommend that market the bonding be on a temporary basis a refunding accomplished by requiring the e entire assessment 60 days prior to the MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Adminstrator, Don Ashworth DATE: October 4, 1976 SUBJ: Laredo Lane Assessments, Development Contract (Hansen & Klingelhutz) Street improvements have been completed in Laredo Lane. As the project effects only the developer, Hansen and Klingelhutz, the city entered into a development contract in 1975 providing for city construction of improvements and assessments back to the developers. Although a public hearing is not required, the council must pass a resolution approving the assessment roll, establishing the interest rate and date of certification to the county_,auditor, and establishing other relevant conditions. The conditions set forth in the resolution would normally be established from the development contract wherein such is delineated. However, this office believes that the terms of the present contract are not favorable to either the city or the developer. Specifically, the development contract calls for: 1). All deferred principal and interest payments are payable in full with taxes received in 1979. AREA OF CONCERN - How will the city pay interest and principal payments in 1977 and 1978? The original concept was to sell 3 year temporary bonds which would have paralleled the repayment schedule. However, this was not done and the project was financed through the 1976 bonds due and payable over a 15 year period commencing in 1977. 2). The interest rate established in the development contract is 6.81%. AREA OF CONCERN - This interest rate is significantly lower than the 7.5% charged to all other projects financed by the 1976 (first series) bond issue. 3). As a condition of the issuance of a building permit for each lot, the developer is required to pay in full all assessments against said lots & the prevailing city and SAC hook up charges.. AREA OF CONCERN - The area affected by this project involves smaller lots than normally required with the city belief that smaller, but affordable, homes would be built in the area. Many of these homes would be of a speculative nature built by the developer. However, the developer would be unable to carry out speculative building in this area if he were required to pay all assessments prior to the time the home were sold to a private individual. Mayor and City Cou. Al -2- October 4, J-976 This office has met with the developer to discuss the areas of concern noted above. At such meeting, the developer stated he would be willing to agree to amending the original development contract to reflect the following: 1). Equal principal payments and interest due would be collected each year over a 7 year period. The effects of this arbitrated position would be one of providing yearly collections by the city (on an accelerated schedule considering other improvements in the bond issue were assessed over a 15 year period) over the following 7 year period. 2). The developer would agree to pay an interest rate of 7.50. 3). The developer would agree to pay in full all assessments against said lotSin addition to the prevailing city and SAC hook up charges at the time of sale of the property or upon occupancy of such. This office would request the council to consider amending the development contrad.t in accordance with the above recommendation. If such were approved by the council, a resolution should be passed, for certification of taxes$ additionally stating the points as listed above. RUSSELL H. LARSON CRAIG M. MERTZ Mr. Donald Chanhassen Box 147 Chanhassen, Dear Don: RIISSELL H. L&RSON ATTORNEY AT LAW 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 September 3, 1976 W. Ashworth City Administrator Minnesota 55317 AREA CODE 612 TELEPHONE 335-9565 Re: Laredo Lane Assessments Hansen & Klingelhutz Construction, Inc. Project 75-8 Reference is made to the attached report of August 14, 1976 from Schoell & Madson, Inc. concerning proposed assessments against the Laredo Lane Subdivision. Reference is also made to 1[5(d) of the Planned Residential Development Contract and Amendment, dated August 29, 1975, between the city and the developer, a copy of which should be in the city files. You will note that at the time the contract was signed, that the idea was to finance these improvements through a three-year temporary improvement bond issue. This method of financing was not employed, as you know, and the project was financed through the 76-1 bond issue. As I see it, the staff must now make a recommendation to the Council as to the method of assessing this project. As it was the intent of the parties that there be one assessment levied and payable in full 60 days prior to the due date of a three year temporary improvement bond issue, I suggest that a resolution be adopted to include the following: From. City Administrator Referred To: Mayor Council_ Planner _ Building Attorney Eng'.nec•, Treasu.or Policy pay l;s _Pec. Stree'. hta:nt.T " Utilities Press Other Date a) Approval of assessment roll as calculated by theenaineers. b) Establish the interest rate at 6.81% (See 1f5d of amendment). c) Provide that the assessment role, less prepayments, be certified to the auditor for collection in one installment with the taxes payable in 1979. d) Provide that as a condition to the issuance of a building permit for each lot, the developer pay in full all assess- ments against said lot in addition to the prevailing city and SAC hook-up charges. Mr. Donald W. Ashworth -2- Re: Laredo Lane Assessments 9-3-76 e) Provide that the developer agrees in writing to the above conditions. Your comments on this will be �ciated. Very/truly K.USSELL H. LARSON Chanhassen City Attorney RHL:mep WILLIAM D. SCHOELL CARLISLE MAOSON JACK T. VOSLER JAMES R. ORR HAROLD E. DAHLIN LARRY L. HANSON RAYMOND J. JACKSON WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY JACK E. GILL FRANK V. LASKA l SCHOELL & MAOSON, inic. y ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS (612) 93B-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343 August 14, 1976 City of Chanhassen c/o Mr. Don Ashworth, Administrator P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Subject: Laredo Lane, Improvement Project No. 75-8, Assessments. Gentlemen: We have calculated the total and unit assessments for the Laredo Lane Project. The project included installation of sani- tary sewer, storm sewer, watermain, streets and curb & gutter. The estimated total cost for the work is $75,191 as item- ized in the attached Table. The assessment per lot is derived by dividing the total cost equally between the 21 lots. The resulting $3,580 is $680 per unit higher than the $2,900 originally estimated in the feasibility study. The higher cost is due to poor subgrade conditions and high bids received on the street and curb & gutter construction. In addition to the lateral assessment, each lot will be charged a trunk availability fee of $700 when the building permit is taken out. There were no trunk costs directly associated with this project. The City Council will have to decide the length of the assessment and the assessment interest rate. Very truly yours, SCHOELL & MAD�ON INC. WJBrezinsky:sjr enclosure LAREDO L.LNE PROJECT ESTIMATED TOTAL COSTS COSTS PAID ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ITEM THROUGH 7/31/76 FUTURE COSTS TOTAL COSTS ENGINEERING - Assessments $ 2002 $ 200 400 As -Built Drawings 4002 ENGINEERING - Staking & Inspec- $ 5,1581 5002 5,658 INSP. & tion SURVEYING LEGAL - City Attorney 100 100 FISCAL - Fiscal Agent 2351 235 - Approving Attorney 341 34 3,549 - Capitalized Interest 3,5491 896 - Discount Allowed 8961 18 - Moody's Rating Fee 181 MISCEL- - Publications 1463 452 191 LANEOUS - Interest on Warrants 2443 244 ADMINISTRA- T I ON CONSTRUCTION 44,918 161927 61,845 .SUB -TOTAL $50,466 $22,904 $73,370 LESS INTEREST FROM INVESTMENTS _ _ 9522 952 SUB -TOTAL $50,466 $21,952 $72,418 ADD ADMINISTRATIVE $2►7735 2,773 TOTAL $50,466 $24,725 $75,191 NOTES 1. Schoell & Madson cost breakdown 2. Schoell & Madson estimate 3. Payments by City through 7/31/76 as listed by Kay Klingelhutz 4. Estimate by Russ Larson, City Attorney 5. Based on percentage of total costs 144 HANSEN & KLINGELHUTZ construction, inc. November 24, 1975 Chanhassen City Council City of Chanhassen Chanhassen, 14innesota 55317 Gentlemen: .1 NOV19751 GF C E v� HAlVRASs� Mt�� 4b It was with great surprise that we learned from a letter dated November 5, 1975, from Mr. Frank Laska of Schoell & Madson Inc.. that the improvements for Laredo Lane Addition still contained an estimated cost for mountable curb on Laredo Drive and Iroquois Drive. Both of these public streets and the improvements were existing prior to requesting consideration and approval of Laredo Lane Addition The first indication we had that improvements outside the plat were being considered as an expense of platting was contained in a letter dated July 9, 1975, from Frank Laska with an estimated cost of improvements attached. James Hawks called Mr. Laska to question the mountable curbs and was referred to Mr. Russ Larson, the City Attorney. A meeting was held with Mr. Larson and it was agreed that IF mountable curbs along Laredo Drive and Iroquois Drive are to be installed under the assessment procedure that the land abutting would be assessed. However, it was also agreed that the possibility of installing mount- able curbs on these two drives abutting only the Laredo Lane Addition would be shown as an option to be acted on by the Council and not considered as a part of the Laredo Lane Addition improvements. This subject was considered by the Council on August 18, 1975, an September 2, 1975, and September 8, 1975, and at no time do we remember the Council taking action to remove a part of the relatively new street surface and order mountable curb installed along Laredo Drive and Iroquois Drive abutting Laredo Lane Addition. Such a decision would add $414 to each lot, thus to each home and it has been our honest intent to do everything possible to offer a quality home at the lowest price to Chanhassen':s new residents. cont. 7198 FRONTIER TRAIL 0 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 0 (612) 474-4146 H" HANSEN & KLINGELHUTZ construction, inc. Chanhassen City Council Cont. page 2 November 24, 1975 We do not believe this curb is needed or in the best interests of the area at this time and request that the engineer be notified to remove it from his plans_ Sincerely,, i Thomas "T"ingel] Douglas Hansen TK:DH:kh 7198 FRONTIER TRAIL 0 CHANHASSEN. MINNESOTA 55317 0 (612) 474-4146 HANSEN & KLINGELHUTZ construction, inc. November 24, 1975 Chanhassen City Council City of Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota Gentlemen: PC** r NOV1975 RECEIVED <:?: Y&LAaE otr CHANHASS�►�j� CU �. MINK. _A The Planned Residential Development District Contract -Laredo Lane" includes certain improvements which are the responsibility of the developer and also requires that a bond be taken out to cover the estimated cost. This is customary and we agree with -the procedure. We do request review of the estimated costs and the method of handling the surety of performance. The suggested bond for $25,000.00 or an irrevocable line of credit which in reality is a $25,000.00 cash account. The engineers estimates are as follows: grading $5000.00 Blvd. sodding 4200.00 driveways 3000.00 site berm 10000.00 mist. 2100.00 total 24,300.00 The boulevard sodding and driveways under normal construction pro- cedures will be completed after the material trucks have completed deliveries for constructing the house - thus it is suggested that a cash deposit be escrowed at the time of receiving the building permit for the house to be constructed. This would remove t)7200.00 from the estimate to be covered by a surety bond while accomplishing the intent. We understand we have this option under paragraph 10 on page 5 of the Development Contract. The escrow for each lot should cover the cost 6f boulevard sod and driveway between street and lot line. The cost would be as follows for an average lot frontage of 80, x 10' boulevard: Sod 90 yds. 45¢ 4o.00 Drive 16x10 = 160 sq. ft. 420 68.00 lo8.00 +10% 10.00 118.00 7198 FRONTIER TRAIL 0 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 0 (612) 474-4146 HANSEN & KLINGELHUTZ construction, inc. Chanhassen City Council page 2 November 24, 1975 The overall grading has been completed according to the plans for road construction and general lot slope. Thus the $5000.00 for grading does not have to be a bonding item. The preliminary shape of the berms along Laredo Drive are in place and some 15 trees were planted this fall. The remainder of the work will take place prior to July 1, 1976, weather permitting. Our estimate of work to be completed* is: Site berm and plantings 200 lin. ft. of fencing @ 4.00 800.00 45 trees @ 40.00 1800.00 1600 yds. sod @ .45 720.00 This would cover amt. of sod for Blvd. r: berms along Laredo 3320.00 3320.00 & Iroquois Street signs 80.00 Idisc. - 4 street lights 600,00 4000 . 00 +lop 400 . 00 4400 . 00 This method of assuring our development obligations will help us in our business structures while still fulfilling the intent of the city. Sifferely, Douglas zansen Thomas Klingelhutz *based on the assumption that each building permit will require a cash escrow for the estimated cost of sodding the boulevard and blacktopping the drive of each individual lot. 7198 FRONTIER TRAIL CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 474-4146 SCHNEIDER AGENCY, INC. "For .411 Your Inturanee Needs" PHONE. BUS. 474-5491 PHONE. HOME 474-8901 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 926-2691 October 31, 1975 City of Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Gentlemen: Hansen & Klingelhut$ Construction Company has made application for a performance bond in the amount of $25,100.00 for the improvement project at Laredo Lane Addition, Chanhassen, Minn. This letter is a binder of coverage for Hartford Insurance Company, who is their insurer and the company that will be issuing the bond in the amount stated above. Very truly yours, B. F. Schneider Agent 0 M 2 3,4 S6j . NOV 1975 `9 a� RECEIVED VILLLAGE OF CHANHAssEN, �u MINN. ,•>. "I �1 RUSSELL H. LARSON CRAIG M. MERTZ RUBISELL H, LARSON ATTORNEY AT LAW 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 September 10, 1975 Mr. Barry R. Brooks Chanhassen City Administrator Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Laredo Lane Hansen & Klingelhutz Dear Barry, AREA CODE 612 TELEPHONE 335-956S Enclosed is the Amendment of the Laredo Lane Development Contract incorporating those changes discussed and agreed upon at the Council meeting of September 8, 1975. Please note paragraph 6 of the attached amendment which states the intent of paragraph 7 of your proposed amendment. I trust the contract and its amendment are now in acceptable form for execution. Very trul ours , ROMWO02r, Russell H. Larson Chanhassen City Attorney 1 '�► Encls . 41) SEP 1975 cc: All Councilmen M RECEIVED Bruce Pankonin vna-AGE of Hansen & Klingelhutz Construction, Inc. attaMHrmssi, EN, Jim Hawks CITY OF CHANHASSEN AMENDMENT PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT LAREDO LANE It is hereby agreed this _ day of _ _ , 1975, by and between the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Hansen & Klingelhutz Construction, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as the Developer, that the certain Laredo Lane Planned Resi- dential Development Contract, dated , 1975, entered into be- tween the above named parties hereby is amended in the following particulars: 1. Item C on page 1 is amended to read as follows: "Driveway surfacing within the public street right of way. " 2. Paragraph l (c) on page 2 is amended to read as follows: "Driveway surfacing within the public street right of way. " 3. Paragraph 5(d) on page 3 is amended to read as follows: "The Developer agrees that the cost of the installation of said facilities, shall be paid by the Developer to the City as a special assessment levied against the property in said plat benefitted by the improvements, in one payment, with interest at the rate of 1% per annum above the annual interest costs of three year temporary improvement bonds issued by the City to finance said improvements, but not to exceed 8% per annum. This payment in full shall be made and the assess- ments for the same , levied in such a manner that the monies will be received by the City 60 days prior to the due date of the three year temporary improvement bond issue. Prepayments may be made to the City except that any payments made in the calendar year during which the special assessment is due and payable shall be paid to the Treasurer of Carver County. " 4. Paragraph 9 on page 5 is amended by adding the following sentences: "Such financial security as is submitted to fulfill this requirement may be reduced by the City Council upon six month intervals by the amount of the estimated cost of the improvement completed to City standards. Such reductions shall, however, be subject to a 10% retention which shall be held until the end of the guarantee period. " 5. Paragraph 9 on page 5 is amended to read as follows: "9. Performance Bond. For the purpose of assuring to the City that the street sign, underground utility, street lighting, boulevard sodding, driveway surfacing., and sight and sound screening improvements to be by the Developer constructed, installed and furnished as set forth in paragraph 1 hereof shall be constructed, installed and furnished according to the terms of this agreement, and that the Developer shall pay all claims for work done and materials and supplies furnished for the performance of this agreement, Developer agrees to furnish to the City a cash deposit in the amount of $25,100.00 or in lieu thereof a corporate surety bond in said amount approved by the City and naming the City as obligee thereunder, or an irrevo- cable letter of credit approved by the City, said deposit, bond or letter of credit, as the case may be, being conditioned upon the performance by the Developer of its obligations hereunder, said sum being equal to 110% of the total cost of such improve- ments as estimated by Schoell & Madson, Inc. , the City Engi- neers , and as set forth in the report of said engineers to the City Council dated August 4, 1975, which report is incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this agreement. " 6. Paragraph 10 on page 5 is amended to read as follows: "10. Boulevards and Driveways. The Developer agrees to furnish, construct and install, at Developer's sole expense , the following improvements for the benefit of each lot within the plat. a. Boulevard sod, which shall be of uniformly good auality. b. Driveway surfacing within the public right of way, which shall be surfaced with either portland type cement concrete or asphaltic concrete as approved by the City Engineers. C. The performance bond provisions of Paragraph 9 hereof shall apply to all of the terms and conditions of this Paragraph 10. 11 7. Paragraph 17 on page 6 is amended to read as follows: "17. Certificates of Occupancy. The Developer cove- nants and agrees that no occupancy shall be requested, and the City shall not be required to issue any such certificates in the said plat until the City has completed the installation of the improvements set forth herein as: a) street grading, stabilizing and bituminous surfacing, except for the final wear course, b) surmountable concrete curbs and gutters, c) sanitary sewer mains and appurtances , d) water mains and appurtances , e) improvements for storm and surface water drainage. Further, that issuance of any such certificate to the Developer prior to the acceptance of said improvements, shall not constitute a waiver by the City of its rights hereunder to require completion of said improvements before issuance of additional occupancy certificates. " 8. The first sentence of Paragraph 18, Construction by City, is amended to read as follows: "The Developer agrees that the City, after finding and showing due cause, may install and construct any work or improvements required herein to be made under Paragraph 1 hereof by the Developer. " IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed on this day and year first above written. HANSEN & KLINGELHUTZ CONSTRUCTION, INC. CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: Its And Its By: Mayor Atte s t: Clerk -Administrator t WILLIAM D. SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON JACK T. VOSLER JAMES R. ORR HAROLD E. DAHLIN LARRY L. HANSON RAYMOND J. JACKSON WILLIAM J. EIREZINSKY JACK E. GILL FRANK V. LASKA SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC. ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS 7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343 September 8, 1975 CITY OF CHANHASSEN c/o Mr. Barry Brooks Chanhassen, Minn. #55317 Subject: Proposed Hansen & Xlingelhutz Laredo Lane Subdivision Dear Mr. Brooks: Confirming our telephone conversation of September 5, the total estimated cost of the work to be done by the developer in Laredo Lane Subdivision is $25,100.00. This cost is itemized below: 'ITEM ESTIMATED COST Grading $5000.00 Boulevard Sodding $4,200.00 Driveways $3,000.00 Sight and Sound Screen $10,800.00 Miscellaneous (Street Lighting, Signs, etc.)- - - '$2,10-0'.-00 TOTAL $25,100.00 Very truly yours, SCHOELL &MADSON,, INC. W. J. Brezinsky:lh CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CONTRACT LAREDO LANE THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this Iq day of Aar. aat , 19 7C , by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, and HANSEN & KLINGELHUTZ CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as the Developer, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer is the fee owner of certain lands described as Outlot C, Western Hills 2nd Addition, Carver County, Minnesota, and situated in the City of Chanhassen, and WHEREAS, the Developer has made application under the City Zoning Ordinance to the City Council for the approval of P-1 Planned Residential Development Plan, including a preliminary plat thereof of said lands, said plat to contain 5.53 acres more or less, divided into 21 lots, and to be known as -Laredo Lane, a copy of said proposed plat as prepared by Egan, Field & Nowak, Inc., dated May 5, 1975, as revised July 1, 1975, being attached hereto as Exhibit "A", hereinafter referred to as "plat" and WHEREAS, the City Council has, by its resolution passed iy 1 1916' , approved said plan and preliminary plat, subject to and on condition that the Developer enter into this agreement, and WHEREAS, the City has established a policy requiring land developers to furnish surfaced streets, curbs, boulevard sodding, gutters, driveways, storm and surface water drainage facilities, street signs and lighting, municipal water and sanitary sewer facilities and under- ground electric and telephone service lines to all lots in plats approved by the City, all of the foregoing hereinafter sometimes referred to as improvements, and WHEREAS, the Developer has made application to the City to be allowed at Developer's expense to construct, install and perform all work and furnish all materials in connection with the installation of the following improvements: a. Street signs b. Boulevard sodding C. Driveway surfacing d. Underground utility lines e. Street lighting f. Sight and sound screening, and WHEREAS, the Developer, as owner of all assessable land within the proposed plat, has petitioned the City to construct and install the following improvements within the plat and to have the cost thereof assessed against all benefited properties therein under the provisions of Chapter 429, Minnesota Statutes: a. Street grading, stabilizing, and bituminous surfacing b. Surmountable concrete curbs and gutters C. Sanitary sewer mains d. Water mains e. Storm and surface water drainage NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and acceptance by the City of the preliminary development plan and plat of Laredo Lane, the City and the Developer agree as follows: 1. Improvements by Developer. Developer agrees at its expense to construct, install and perform all work and furnish all materials and equipment in connection with the installation of the following improvements: a. Street signs b. Boulevard sodding C. Driveway surfacing d. Underground utility lines e. Street lighting f. Sight and sound screening 2. Standards of Construction. Developer agrees that all of the foregoing improvements shall equal or exceed City standards, shall be constructed and installed in accordance with engineering plans and specifications approved by the City engineers and the requirements of applicable City ordinances, and that all of said work shall be subject to the supervision of the City engineers. 3. Materials and labor. All of the materials to be employed in the making of said improvements and all of the work performed in connection therewith shall be of uniformly good and workmanlike quality, shall equal or exceed City standards and specifications, and shall be subject to the inspection and approval of the City. In case any material or labor supplied shall be rejected by the City as defective or unsuitable then such rejected material shall be removed and replaced with approved material, and rejected labor shall be done anew to the satisfaction and approval of the City at the cost and expense of the Developer. -2- 4. Schedule of Work. The Developer further agrees that it shall commence work hereunder on or before Cora,-_ez a,7 , 19 7; , and shall have all work done and improvements fully completed to the satisfaction and approval of the City on or before J'uL-1 ( , 19 rlb. The Developer shall submit a written schedule indicating the proposed progress schedule and order of completion of work covered by this contract, which schedule shall be a part of this contract. Upon receipt of written notice from the Developer of the existence of causes over which the Developer has no control which will delay the completion of the work, the City, in its discretion, may extend the date herein - before specified for completion. 5. Roads, Sanitary Sewer, Water and Storm Sewer Facilities. a. The City agrees to cause its engineers to prepare all plans and specifications necessary for install- ation of roads, sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer facilities in said plat. Developer and the City agree that the total estimated cost of said improvement is $70,600. b. The City agrees that upon its approval of said plans and specifications bids will be taken by the City and contracts awarded for the installation of the said facilities under the supervision of the City, provided, however, that the City reserves the right to reject any and all bids for said work. C. Developer, as owner of all assessable land within the proposed road, sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer improvement area, hereby waives the requirement of an improvement hearing for the purpose or ordering the said improvements. d. Developer agrees that the entire cost of the install- ation of said facilities, shall be paid by the Developer to the City as special assessments levied against the property in said plat benefited by the improvements in three (3) equal annual installments with interest on unpaid installments at the rate of one percent (la) per annum above the annual interest cost of temporary improvement bonds issued by the City to finance said improvements, but not to exceed eight percent (8%) per annum. If the special assessments levied by resolution of the City Council pursuant to this agreement are adopted by it between October 10th of any year, and April loth of the following year, Developer agrees that it will pay to the City one- half (1/2) of the first annual installment with interest on or before May 31st next following the levy, -3- and will pay the remaining one-half (1/2) of such first installment with interest to the City on or before the following September 30th. All remaining installments shall be paid as assessments to the Treasurer of Carver County as and when the general property taxes become due upon said property. If the special assessments levied by 'the City Council pursuant to this agreement are adopted between April llth and October 9th of any year, then all install- ments due hereunder shall be paid as assessments to the Treasurer of Carver County as and when the general property taxes become due on said property. (i) Provided, however, and in any event, as a condition to the issuance by the City of a building permit for each lot in said plat, Developer agrees to pay in full all unpaid installments of special assessments levied against such lot, in addition to the following prevailing City sewer and water hook-up charges. 6. Reimbursements of Costs. The Developer shall reimburse the City for all costs, including reasonable engineering, legal, planning and administrative expenses, incurred by the City in connection with all matters relating to the administration and enforcement of the within agreement and the performance thereof by the Developer. 7. Disclaimer by City.' It is understood and agreed that the City, the City Council, and the agents and employees of the City shall not be personally liable or responsible in any manner to the Developer the Developer's contractors or subcontractors, materialmen, laborers or to any other person, firm or corporation whomsoever, for any debt, claim, demand,damages, actions or causes of action of any kind or character arising out of or by reason of the execution of this agreement or the performance and completion of the work and improvements hereunder; and that the Developer will save the City, the City Council, and the agents and employees of the City harmless from any and all claims, damages, demands, actions or causes of action arising therefrom and the costs, disbursements and expenses of defending the same. 8. Written Change Orders. The Developer shall do no work nor furnish materials for which reimbursement is expected from the City unless a written order for such work 'or materials is received from the City. Any such work or materials which may be done or furnished by the Developer without such written order first being given shall be at its own risk, cost and expense, and Developer hereby agrees that without such written order Developer will make no claim for compensation for work or materials so done or furnished. -4- 9. Performance Bond. For the purpose of assuring to the City that the street sign, underground utility, street lighting and sight and sound screening improvements to be by the Developer constructed, installed and furnished as set forth in Paragraph 1 hereof shall be constructed, installed and furnished according to the terms of this agreement, and that the Developer shall pay all claims for work done and materials and supplies furnished for the performance of this agreement, Developer agrees to furnish to the City a cash deposit in the amount Of $ a6 o00 . o0 or iii lieu thereof a corporate surety bond in said amount approved by the City and naming the City as obligee thereunder, or an irrevocable letter of credit approved by the City, said deposit, bond, or letter of credit, as the case may be, being conditioned upon the performance by the Developer of its obligations hereunder, said sum being equal to 110% of the total cost of such improvements as estimated by Schoell & Madson, Inc., the City Engineers, and as setforth in the report of said engineers to the City Council dated aelokr / , 19jf, which report is incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this agreement. 10. Boulevards and Driveways. The Developer agrees to furnish, construct and install, at Developer's sole expense, the following im- provements for the benefit of each lot within the plat. a. Boulevard sod, which good quality; b. Driveway surfacing, ation of which shall Engineers. shall be of uniformly the materials and install - be approved by the City For the purpose of assuring to the City that the improvements required by this Paragraph 10 shall be constructed and installed accord- ing to the requirements of this agreement, Developer agrees to furnish to the City a corporate surety bond, approved by the City, in the amount of $ per lot, naming the City as obligee thereunder, and conditioned upon performance by the Developer of the obligations re- quired by this paragraph. With the consent of the City and in lieu of said bond, the Developer may deposit the sum of $ per lot with the City at the time application is made for a building permit for each lot. Said bond shall be terminated, or cash deposit returned to the Developer, upon approval of the installations by the City. 11. Erosion Control. Developer, at its expense, shall provide temporary dams, earthwork or such other devices and practices, including seeding of graded areas as shall be needed, in the judgment of the City engineers, to prevent the washing, flooding, sedimentation and erosion of lands and roads within and outside the plat during all phases of construction, including construction on individual lots. Developers shall keep all streets within the plat free of all dirt and debris re- sulting from construction therein by the Developer or its agents. -5- 12. Access. Reasonable access, including temporary grading and graveling, shall be provided to all occupied residences in the plat until the streets are accepted by the City. 13. Street Lighting. The expense of furnishing electrical energy for street lighting purposes shall be assumed by the City months after the completion of installation of the street lighting system, or after of the building lots have been approved by the construction of residences thereon, whichever is first to occur. 14. Replacement. All work and materials performed and furnished hereunder by the Developer, its agents and subcontractors, found by the City to be defective within one year after acceptance by the City shall be replaced by Developer at Developer's sole expense. 15. Liability Insurance. The Developer shall take out and maintain during the life of this agreement public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors, or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury or death shall be not less than $100,000 for one person and $300,000 for each accident; limits for property damage shall be not less than $100,000 for each accident. The City shall be named as co-insured on said policy and the Developer shall file a copy of the insurance coverage with the City. 16. Water and Sewer Revenues. All water and sanitary sewer service charges shall at all times be billed by the City and all revenues derived therefrom shall be the sole property of the City. 17. Building Permits. The Developer covenants and agrees that no occupancy certificates or permits shall be requested and the City shall not be required to issue any such permits in the said plat until the City has completed the installation of the improvements setforth in Paragraphs 1 and 5 hereof (except the final road wearing course) to the City specifications, and that issuance of any such permit or permits to the Developer prior to the acceptance of said improvements shall not constitute a waiver by the City of its rights hereunder to require completion of said improvements before issuance of additional occupancy permits. 18. Construction by City The Developer agrees that the City, at the option of the City, can install and construct any work or im- provements required herein to be made under paragraph 1 hereof by the Developer. In the event the City makes any such improvements under its power to make local improvements and specially assess the cost thereof, wholly or in part, under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, the Developers agree to pay the entire amount of the assessment roll pertaining to any such local improvement within thirty (30) days after its adoption. Developer agrees that in the event of its failure to pay in full any such special assessment within the time prescribed herein the City shall have a specific lien on all of Developer's real property within said plat for any amount so unpaid, and foreclose said lien in the manner mechanics liens under the laws of 19. Srecial Conditions. the City shall have the right to prescribed for the foreclosure of the State of Minnesota. a. Landscaping and location of structures on individual lots shall be determined through discussions between City staff and Developer or their assigns prior to issuance of building permits, subject to the following standards and conditions. (i) Landscaping and location of structures shall take into consideration the preservation of trees, slope protection, subsurface drainage, prevention of siltation and similar potential problems. (ii) In the event agreement cannot be reached between the City Staff and Developer, the City shall have the right, at the expense of the Developer, to engage the services of the City Engineer, Planner, a landscape architect, a soil conservation Planner, a landscape architect, a soil conservation consultant, and others, to advise as to specific problems. (iii) The certificate of occupancy for each homesite, or covenants and restrictions, may.contain conditions for tree maintenance, and restrictions on tree removal after consultations with the City Forester. (iv) Rear yards of lots abutting Laredo Drive shall be provided with sodded or seeded berms, fencing and coniferous and deciduous tree plantings to furnish sight and sound screening to said lots. Said plant- ings, fencing and berms shall be maintained by Developer until said lots are sold to homeowners occupying same. (v) All front yards shall shall be seeded or sodded, to prevent soil erosion. be sodded; all rear yards at the option of Developer, (vi) The location of the principal structure upon the lots within the plat shall make allowance, as the case may be, for the construction of an attached or detached double garage. - 7- b. Developer acknowledges receipt of the Site Plan Review report of April 15, 1975, by United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof, and agrees to provide for individual site drainage, basement waterproofing, artificial drainage and soil erosion and sedimentation control consistent with said reports. c. Developers acknowledge receipt of the reports of the City Zoning Administrator, Engineer and Planner, which are.incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof, and agree to comply with the conditions of said reports consistent with the provisions of the within contract. d. No private driveways shall exit on Laredo drive. e. The general development of the plat including the housing styles and mix shall be as set forth in Developer's written proposal of May 1, 1975 sub- mitted to the City Planning Commission, except as the same may be modified herein or by the reports and recommendations of the City Engineer and City Planner, and the Site Plan Review of ASCS. f. The radius of each of the proposed Laredo Lane cul- de-sacs shall be 50 feet, the road surface of said Laredo Lane shall be 28 feet in width, and the finished radius of each cul-de-sac shall be 40 feet. g. All curb and gutter shall be of the concrete surmountable type. h. The lot line between Lots 7 and 8 of the proposed plat shall be relocated to equalize the frontage between the lots. i. Four (4) catch basins shall be installed in the north cul-de-sac, two (2) between Lots 7 and 8, and two (2) One lot away in each direction. j. An 18 inch reinforced concrete storm sewer pipe shall be installed from the north cul-de-sac to the existing 24 inch reinforced concrete pipe in Iroquois Avenue, and a drainage swale of a width to be determined by the City shall be constructed along the alignment of said pipe to accommodate overland storm water flow. A perpetual easement for said pipe and swale shall be shown on the plat and dedicated to the City. 0M. 7. Paragraph 17 on page 6 is amended to read as follows: "17. Certificates of Occupancy._ The Developer cove- nants and agrees that no occupancy shall be requested, and the City shall not be required to issue any such certificates in the said plat until the City has completed the installation of the improvements set forth herein as: a) street grading, stabilizing and bituminous surfacing, except for the final wear course, b) surmountable concrete curbs and gutters, c) sanitary sewer mains and appurtances , d) water mains and appurtances , e) improvements for storm and surface water drainage. Further, that issuance of any such certificate to the Developer prior to the acceptance of said improvements, shall not constitute a waiver by the City of its rights hereunder to require completion of said improvements before issuance of additional occupancy certificates . " 8. The first sentence of Paragraph 18, Construction by City, is amended to read as follows: "The Developer agrees that the City, after finding and showing due cause, may install and construct any work or improvements required herein to be made under Paragraph 1 hereof by the Developer. " IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed on this day and year first above written. HANSEN & KLINGELHUTZ CONSTRUCTION, INC. i By: It CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: Mayor Atte s t: A� Clerk -Administrator k. All propsed covenants and restrictions to be placed upon the lots in said plat shall be approved by the City Attorney. 20. Remedies Upon Default. In the event the Developer shall default in the performance of any of the covenants and agreements here- in contained, and such default shall not have cured within ten days after receipt by the Developer of written notice thereof, the City, if it so elects, may cause any of the required improvements to be constructed and installed, and may cause the entire cost thereof, including all reasonable engineering, legal and administrative expense incurred by the City, to be recovered as herein provided. In addition to the fore- going, the City may also institute legal action against the Developer and the corporate surety on their performance bond, if any, or utilize any cash deposit made hereunder, or draw upon any letters of credit filed hereunder, to collect, pay or reimburse the City for the cost of making any of said improvements. In the event of an emergency, as determined by the City Engineers, the notice requirements to the Developer shall be and hereby are waived in their entirety, and the Developer shall reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City in remedying the conditions creating the emergency. 21. Address of Developers. The address of the Developer for purposes of this development contract is: L° ffRiYffi�.�'SE/S� f/lia/�Csors� 22. Successors and Assigns. It is agreed by and between the parties hereto that the agreement herein contained shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of their respective successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed on the day and year first above written. HANSEN-& KLINGELHUTZ CONSTRUCTION, INC. i By Its And i Its CITY OF CHANHASSEN By At uierx-xaministrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) On this day of19 before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Al Klingelhutz and Ityk to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn they did say that 'they are respectively the Mayor and Clerk - Administrator of the corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its City Council and said Al Klingelhutz and Barry Brooks acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. ,., r.;,Y !iL NGELHU Z ,JOTAR: PULLiC- MiNNESOTA COUNTY CARVER C h7y Cammi:-sion Ex; , ices Jan. 3a,1981� STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) r Notary Public County, Minnesota My commission expires On this oW day of 4QC u S T , 19 %Jy , before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared QCLA % '6. UgjA( Se:ni and a S • C:.y4r.6rL,yuTz to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn D(D say that they are respectively the President and the N,7-m5--/04 y �2E�SUQICfL of the corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of 0106c a/i-S 09119 and said d.t�ls�l�4S f-lRNS'EN and TD/yl�?S �. �i�6E G�lJTZ acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. K.iY KLiI\uELHUTZ 4 N.0 TRY "E3 iC • NI NN€3OTA C IRVER COUNTY ` ' y C"""""'f"' ; n a'X- i es Jan. 30 tary Public County, Minnesota commission expires /-,j a -11- CITY OF CHANHASSEN AMENDMENT PLANf�ED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT LAREDO LANE It is hereby agreed this _zq_ ciay of _ WC4t5T 1975, by :drbetween the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as tf:: City, and Hansen & Klingelhutz Construction, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as the Developer, that the certain Laredo Lane Planned Resi- _tential Development Contract, dated Acc sr Z 9 1975, entered into be- tween the above named parties hereby is amended in the following particulars: 1 . Itam C on page 1 is amended to read as follows: "Driveway surfacing within the public street right of way. " 2. Paragraph 1(c) on page 2 is amended to read as follows: "Driveway surfacing within the public street right of way. " 3. Paragraph 5(d) on page 3 is amended to read as follows: "The Developer agrees that the cost of the installation of said facilities, shall be paid by the Developer to the City as a special assessment levied against the property in said plat benefitted by the improvements, in one payment, with interest : the rato of 1% por ann il, the annual interest costs of three year temporary improvement bonds issued by the City to finance said improvements , but not to exceed 8% per annum. This payment in full Shall be made and the assess- ments for the same , levied in such a manner that the monies will be received by the City 60 days prior to the due date of the three year temporary improvement bond issue. Prepayments may be made to the City except that any payments made in the calendar year during which the special assessment is due and payable shall be paid to the Treasurer of Carver County. " 4. Paragraph 9 on page 5 is amended by adding the following sentences: "Such financial security as is submitted to fulfill this requirement may be reduced by the City Council upon six month intervals by the amount of the estimated cost of the improvement completed to City standards. Such reductions shall, however, be subject to a 10% retention which shall be held until the end of the guarantee period. " 5. Paragraph 9 on page 5 is amended to read as follows: "9. Performance Bond. For the purpn;e of assuring to the City that the street sign, underground utility, street lighting, boulevard sodding, driveway surfacing, and sight and sound screening improvements to be by the Developer constructed, installed and furnished as set forth in paragraph 1 hereof shall be constructed, installed and furnished according to the terms of this agreement, and that the Developer shall pay all claims for work done and materials and supplies furnished for the performance of this agreement, Developer agrees to furnish tc, the City a cash deposit in the amount of $25, 100.00 or in lie-1 thereof a corporate surety bond in said amount approved by the City and naming the City as obligee thereunder, or an irrevo- cable letter of credit approved by the City, said deposit, bond or letter of credit, as the case may be , being conditioned upon the performance by the Developer of its obligations hereunder, said sum being equal to 110% of the total cost of such improve- ments as estimated by Schoell & Madson, Inc. , the City Engi- neers , and as set forth in the report of said engineers to the City Council dated August 4, 1975, which report is incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this agreement. " 6. Paragraph 10 on page 5 is ai:.;nn-led to, rea. E as foi.l:_,ws. "10. Boulevards and Driveways . The Developer agrees to furnish, construct and install, at Developer's sole expense , the following improvements for the benefit of each lot within the plat. a. Boulevard sod, which shall be of uniformly good quality . b. Driveway surfacing within the public right of way, which shall be surfaced with either portland type cement concrete or asphaltic concrete as approved by the City Engineers. c. The performance bond provisions of Paragraph 9 hereof shall apply to all of the terms and conditions of this Paragrapr: 10. " ,jOLUTION A, 1776-1976 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE@P.O BOX 147*CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317a(612) 474-8885 DATE: August 18, 1975 TO: City Council FROM: Barry R. Brooks, Clerk -Administrator SUBJ: Petition for Improvements and the Laredo Lane Addition Discussion: The Hansen/Klingelhutz Company has submitted a letter to me petitioning the City to install and special assess the utility and street improvements in their new addition. They are requesting that the assessment be for a period of approximately eight (8) years with seven (7) payments. A search of our records shows that the City did install improvements and used an eight (8) year assessment procedure for Longview Circle. Heading alternatives: 1. Indicate willingness to install the improvements as requested, and order a feasibility report. 2. Advise the applicants that the City is unwilling at this time to extend its bonding power for a private developer and require that they post the proper bond for all improvements. 3. Approve as in No. 1, but state that the length of the assessment would be limited to three (3) years. Recommendation: This is a council policy decision. There is no statutory or theoretical limit to the amount of money a municipality can have outstanding in bonds for this purpose. The reason for -2- this is that the City is only pledging its good faith in case the assessments are not paid, the property goes tax delinquent and it is never repurchased. I suggest the three (3) year bonding, in that this might serve the developers purpose and would simiplify the processing for the bonding in that bonds for three (3) years or less are often considered temporary. Note: Might be advisable for the council to consider a written policy which would apply to all developers equally on this matter. Such a policy could be reviewed periodically and changed to reflect changing economic conditions. Barry R. Brooks Clerk -Administrator HANSEN & KLINGELHUTZ construction, inc. August 4, 1975 Honorable Mayor Al Klingelhutz Chanhassen City Council Chanhassen, Minnesota Re: Laredo Lane Addition tide request that sewer, water, streets, curbs and storm sewer be put in and assessed against the property for a term of 7 years or more. The above work to be done according to plans and specifications furnished by Hansen & Klingelhutz Construction, Inc. and drawn by Egan, Field & Novak. Sincerely, 1�&tl �&-��sr�C. Douglas Hansen President DH/kh 7198 FRONTIER TRAIL 0 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 0 (612) 474-4146 WILLIAM D. SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON JACK T. VOSLER JAMES R. ORR HAROLD E. DAHLIN LARRY L. HANSON RAYMOND J. JACKSON WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY JACK E. GILL FRANK V. LASKA f' SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC. ENGINEERS ANO SURVEYORS (6123 938-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343 August 4, 1975 Mr. Russell H. Larson, Attorney 1900 First National Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Subject: Cost Estizaate for Proposed Laredo Lane Addition Dear Mr. Larson: Enclosed please find a cost estimate for the above -named subdivision, which was approved by the City Council on July 7, 1975. It Consists of the sanitary and storm sewer, watermains, roadway grading, concrete mountable curb, paving the street, and the sight and sound screen._ For convenience we have broken the estimate into the four parts covering 21 lots. Item Cost Cost per Lot Grading, Paving, Utilities, etc., of Laredo Lane Addition $70,600 $3,362 Sight and Sound Screen 10,800 514 Mountable Curb on Laredo Drive 7,200 343 Mountable Curb on Iroquois Drive 1,500 71 Estimated Total $90 ,100 - `$74 , 290 Shown on the drawing, from which this cost estimate was prepared, are two turn-arounds of 45 feet in radius, which have been changed to 50 feet. This change has been considered in this estimate. In the platting ordinance, for the city, it specifies a curb be constructed at the edge of the blacktop roads, with no mention of the type. Consequently we have assumed it means a concrete mountable curb, tahich we have used in this estimate This total of $90,100, represent the total estimated cost of the complete project, less the hookup charges by the City and the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, both of which would SCHOELL & MAOSON.INC. Mr. Russell H. Larson Page 2 be on the basis of the 21 lots mentioned above. August 4, 1975 In our recent conversation, the placing of concrete mountable curb on Laredo and Iroquois Drives was discussed. This total cost figure of $8,700, as shown in the cost estimate, rep- resents a higher cost per foot of curb than on the new streets within the subdivision. This is due to the fact that both these streets have already been blacktopped and placing a concrete curb will necessitate cutting out and replacing one foot of the present blacktop in order to meet the catch basins, which are in place on the present streets. The Council will have to issue a directive as to whether (1) The mountable concrete curbs on the back of the lots on present streets which abut the subdivision are the responsibility of the subdivider or, (2) whether the mountable concrete curbs should be placed by the subdivider but charged to the lots as a special assessment charged to (a) all the lots, in this case 21 or, (b) merely the lots, in this' case 10, which have the mountable curb on the lots or, (3) leave this item out until such time as a general curb and gutter improvement is contemplated for more than this subdivision. FVLaska:cw enclosure cc: Mr. Barry Brooks Of '' CHANHAgSENr Very truly yours, SCHOELL & MADSON, I.NC. WILLIAM D. SCHDELL CARLISLE MADSON JACK T. VOSLER JAMES R.ORR HAROLD E. DAHLIN LARRY L. HANSON RAYMOND J. JACKSON WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY JACK E. GILL FRANK V. LASKA SCHOELL & MAOSON, talc. ' 'T ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS (6121 938-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 July 9, 1975 Mr. Russell H. Larson, Attorney 1900 First National Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Subject: Cost Estimate for Proposed Laredo Lane Addition. Dear Mr. Larson: Enclosed please find a cost estimate for the above -named subdivision, which was approved by the City Council on July 7, 1975. It consists of the sanitary and storm sewer, watermains, roadway grading, concrete mountable curb, paving the street, and the sight and sound screen. For convenience we have broken the estimate into the four parts covering 21 lots. Item i Cost Cost per Lot Grading, Paving, Utilities, etc., of Laredo .Lane Addition $70,600 $3,362 Sight.and Sound Screen 10,800 514 Mountable Curb on Laredo Drive 7,200 343 Mountable Curb on Iroquois Drive 1,500 71 Estimated Total $90,100 $4,290 Shown on the drawing, from which this cost estimate was prepared, are two turn -grounds of 45 feet in radius, which have been changed to 50 feet. This change has been considered in this estimate. In the platting ordinance, it specifies that a curb shall be constructed at the edge of the blacktop, with no mention of the type. Consequently we have assumed that it means a concrete mountable curb, however, there are no concrete curbs at present on either of the two blacktop streets which surround this subdivision. P7e hope this meets with your approval. Very truly yours, SCHOELL & MADSON, ZINC. FVLaska:bk enclosure Cc: Mr. Earry Rrnnlec at., 0, ni tam an�0ies Cut i - Z ,C) .p IL nt �Ye Se o 611 ca $inder e °Ck C 6d I3yd • Wa t_�- — — — — ��'drart t 0 E an t 1 e 6„ .I tj�a1ve9 Se I ZCe „ 15 serve Ce Gr uA „ R• C. x8 R PiAe 401es PzAe or 81 D C tC12 $ Si kNlt h9 na L3� 1- 12 $Ie Curb it 4`i/2,�sex0us Area r� s0ddin9�8it4rn0us &aSs Total Estimated C En ar2;3 - TpT lnees 1n5 and Cor_ ` - - �z TOTED COST SCHOELL & MAOSON.INC. July 8, 1975 COST ESTIMATE PROPOSED LAREDO LANE ADDITION SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAINS, STORM SEWER, MOUNTABLE CURB AND BLACKTOP Excavation �8" Sanitary Sewer 0' - 8' Depth Manholes 0' - 10' Depth Cut into Existing Line Wye Service Connection 6" Service Binder Rock 6" D.I.P. Watermain. and Hydrant Leads Cut into Existing line Hydrants 6" Valves 1" Service Pipe 1" Service Group 15" R.C. Pipe 18" R.C. Pipe Manholes 0' - 8' Depth Cut into Existing Line Catch Basins 5,000 C.Y. @ $ 1.00/C.Y. $ 5,000 755 L.F. @ $ 11.00/L.F. 8,305 5 Ea. @ $550.00/Ea. 2,750 1 Ea. @ $300.00/Ea. 300 21 Ea. @ $ 40.00/Ea. 840 700 L.F. @ $ 6.00/L.F. 4,200 200 Ton. @ 4.00/Ton 800 890 L.F. @ $ 7.00/L.F. 2 Ea. @ $100.00/Ea. 2 Ea. @ $500.00/Ea. 4 Ea. @ $250.00/Ea. 700 L.F. @ $ 6.00/L.F. 21 Ea. @ $ 50.00/Ea. 75 L.F. @ $ 12.00/L.F. 125 L.F. @ .$ 15.00/L.F. 1 Ea. @ $550.00/Ea. 1 Ea. @ $300.00/Ea. 3 Ea. @ $500.00/Ea. Mountable curb 1,540 L.F. @ $ 3.15/L.F. 1-1/2" Bituminous Wearing Course 2,600 S.Y. @ $, 1.10/S.Y. 4-1/2" Bituminous Base 630 Ton @ $ 10.50/Ton Sodding 3,000 S.X. @ $ 1.00/S.Y. Total Estimated Construction Cost Engineering and Contingencies - 21% TOTAL ESTIMATED COST 6,230 200 1,000 1,000 4,200 1,050 900 1,875 550 300 1,500 4,851 2,860 6,615 3,000 $58,326 12,274 $70,600 OOS' T $ ZS00 aSs'dIn ixsa ' 101 L9Z %TZ - saTau9buTiuo0 puE buTa99UTbua ££Z'T $ 4so0 uot4anx4suo0 P94MT4sS TEgoy OOZ '7L'S/00'T $ 0 *L'S OOZ buTppos OS 'xC'S/00'Z $ 0 *x*s SZ as.ano0 butaEa,4 snouTum'.Tg. „Z/T=T aoeTdag 06 uos/00'ST $ P) uoy 9 . aseg snouTumgTg , Z/T-P aasTdag 88Z-a'U/09'1 $ 0 'd'Z Z6T wiomsu u—. d-7c--.%oeT1a {,.O 909 $ '3'T/91'£ $ 0 '3'`Z Z6T aaggn9 PuE gzn0 aTgEqunOII sniva sionboxl No axno aigao soo auav anora ooZ' L $ ZSo0 aasvrrssx av oa, 69Z'T %TZ - saTauabuTguoO pue buTaaauTbua .T£6'9 $ 4so0 uoTgonz4s1ao0 pagEurrgsS TEgoy 000'T 'X'S/00'T $ 0 'A's 0001T buTPPaS OSZ 'R'S/00'Z $ 0 'x'S SZT asano0 bu-pamwA snou=. ,4Tg „Z/T-T aaETcTag OSi, uo,L/00'ST $ 0 Vol O£ as -ea. snouTumgTEX „Z/T-V aoEta'ag S9£`T '3"I/09'T $ 0 '3'U OT6 8AO=g PM 604NoeTg -4n0 998' Z $ ' a' VST' £ $ P) ' 3'U OT6 aaggn9 pue gan0 9Tqt-4tmcW a&raa Oazm No uan0 3=onoo S7rdS,m0w 008' 0T$ IS00 cralvIISS3 7v= SL8171 %TZ - s9Tau9buTguo0 puE buTaSMTbug SZ6'8 $ 4so0 uoTgOnagsuo0 PegvmTgsa TE401 008'T 'a'Z/00-01 $ 0 '3'`I 98T anua3 SZT'L $ 'p2/00'SL $ 0 'ER 96 saaal an-rxa oasUV7 ao maxos amnos (iNv sxois (panuigu00) - SIVKI.Lsa ISOO 'ONI'NOSC3VVY'8 'i1aOHO3 O�-UTIO/V B/ c F �C) �C D Q rJ 4- 1776-1976 ��qq ��qqCITY gqyy�� OF SHN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE®P.O. BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 553170(612) 474-8885 DATE: July 1, 1975 FROM: Bruce Pankonin, City Planner TO: Mayor and City Council SUBJ: Hansen/Klingelhutz - Laredo Lane PRD REF: Ordinance 47, Section 14 The following enclosures are included within Exhibit 1 Hansen and Klingelhutz Laredo Lane PRD: Enclosures: 1. Community Location Graphic. 2. Procedures for Planned Residential Development (preliminary draft.) 3. Laredo Lane proposed Preliminary Development Plan. 4. Petitioner's Report dated May 1, 1975. 5. Carver County Soil and Water Conservation District Report dated April 15, 1975. 6. City Engineer's Report dated April 16, 1975. 7. City Planner's Report dated April 18, 1975. 8. Planning Commission Minutes dated April 23, 1975. 9. City Engineer's Report dated May 9, 1975. Hanse;.iKlingelhutz - Laredo Lane PRD 10. City Planner's Report dated May 9, 1975. 11. Planning Commission Minutes dated May 14, 1975. 12. Planning Commission Minutes dated May 28, 1975. 13. City Planner's Report dated June 6, 1975. 14. City Engineer's Report dated June 11, 1975. 15. Public Hearing Minutes dated June 11, 1975. 16. Planning Commission Minutes dated June 11, 1975. 17. City Planner's Report dated July 1, 1975. -2- _,10\-UTION p 1776-1976 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE-0P 0 BOX 147+CHANHASSEN, MINN ESOTA 553170(612) 474-8885 PLANNING REPORT DATE: July 1, 1975 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bruce Pankonin, City Planner SUBJ: Hansen/Klingelhutz - Laredo Lane PRD REF: City Ordinance 47, Section 14 The Planning Commission duly held a public hearing on June 11, 1975, for the purpose of considering Hansen/Klingelhutz's proposed Laredo Lane Planned Residential Development (PRD.) In addition, the Commission on June 11, 1975, recommended to the City Council that the proposed PRD be approved as submitted with the following conditions; 1. Cul-de-sac radius should be fifty (50) feet. 2. Lot line between lots 7 and 8 be relocated to equalize the frontage between these two lots. 3. Road surface be twenty-eight (28) feet wide with a forty (40) foot radius finished cul-de-sac. 4. Surmountable concrete curb and gutter will be required. 5. Four (4) catch basins be installed on the north cul-de-sac, two (2) between lots 7 and 8, and the other two (2), one lot away in each direction. 6, An 18 inch reinforced concrete pipe from the cul-de-sac to the existing 24 inch RCP on Iroquois. 7. A drainage swale be constructed along the alignment of the pipe to accommodate over -land flow. Hansen/Klingelhutz Laredo Lane PRD 8. Furnishing City Attorney with any proposed restrictions and/or covenants to be placed on the subject property. 9. Final development plans be prepared (and approved by City) in 1975; time phasing be from 1975 to 1977. PLANNER'S RECOMMENDATION: Approve PRD as submitted with the above mentioned conditions. -2- ULV.2LQ zRL=i T - Pita ,�^• c9rYZ is.:F.11t""ti..aE14 e''��'� Ye.ut�.�.`3�dr°sz.tae'f...! i.j fJkm 11—p ,A. 00 oi:So Dan .l�3a 6e called '�k ��'�.a' `� ' C -Bci.�:.•..n ± o c f:'cyc .�s�.'�"In the ti'� .'i,. 1'l.'�•'...1. A,�3'i 1. %'.l��l� �=:::�•.:7.:�a1 ,Y �:i pr�;.:$C'`',:: t w �`^'ia i°a�S"�.� �:i� a3C� � 'a::,ii:#.i.'n �'�1:�'kait,g s�nd,s 171-ad x�S�.rd.4:�a3's3i i;�:p niti: clz T ~ ,y •r d Jer l' �� A2f�1�' o � skit £yw'i �; lk aas. a� s a ni$ ,, °. he : �+�.� f�$t ::I'3�,.-,� .r.CB�t1 :>afi%�:d naB.�3r CaF;a „> a i•le.H Nat par, 411 cima3,&.ze,:`n circle .17001 Stodo-Ic"'.t Rc.)aal. q, tdin :AGt`;, nka cou 7>ter e 7550 G.k. C:a-I.-* PP l a.kns B end s a: o s etor L:+,.h'A°'rF%iaye p 7,1122. FK':4n ie. Trail l Lyle RiClcla-feer 507 Dal Rio Ed.r�� walche % 413 ..,j.iifs:,,rrzr7a t.+.as.n.t,. tt •sl aL�L C'<�Ab 67 r. City P_','anmr read the of2icial 0t icls'. ES Pub.Li shzLa is c6untly Herald. 9%'? wk ;s gave e ''Clio, �,W+?�:v`3.3"�:1lt'I�:�.o D °,s h.2 � 'dN�, ?a �� :� ;3 �,�ir.~3��'� �,�� 0`311GK�(:w; s� •� °•' 'J c ,1 ..s.e. .i' �' f� :v�>.."�i.I 11"\.".. 4 ..�a.�Ld� cid:rMRi �:': .°d'C? m• . i�Y `:id s>`?wC1 E� �.��eas' r'r:r .£: ��.•. , r a �,.� ';x" te y�,�t f a o e h a In si.n i »fie".. )' t>, a:. j�Lr E 3' bv ZYf1.€ znq i»3:.:itt".�' p � h r� $ m? , r t:: p s.'.n. r t : A : . `d:sa1Y AV �.+'a L; ,Aal: 0, .ts�e ax ^ .�•. t I L.,.�ec a�C'; o J,e it. �4 '; z 63:.rt. ,ry�;�i"� ,p.,.:.Tz,m .t.k.,c;:, ,a4:: ^ Yr, i .•� n 0.t V W �A!:5'4 w'�r's�':. d. 6.F f..m i'^. ? Si7: ±:�u ::��E.T: .fwd i wv� `•�"' `..:.�c .Ai t.:�� i�S?. .i:i may aY 1z _'Ev•..tl ° hLI � imQ 6 it ��'e>.a `t;a uu`�.ra.�t ion. µ��... 3:a�.�: r The«.a.i� a;::�.�,e: +: C 59 3 �) �m �, nc g �c� na 7 t ys s` r, G, i a > r,. G i L3E. Gr i Ay d �S�AhLf!.L .1 l}+6. k��'is. l4. .� :, d..':.. �,7 rA �jD y�� ,�-1 ( ° .�J tL'�i : .a r.n: }. Fi.L[ I�r•i•J � 4: TS IS> !L:i. tr2ci�'.�� En �44; ong .i>i(�:e,x --d a Dz,u.ve . . u this ,3.j4J.b .�,'Yi�1atld L� e aRII a'0:[->�.'ias t to%rl,Mi. C 4,ty a i nci Yr' .;t..�-''.�e9.>0nA 're'..y,:,.3 �..<. :. "i'4:�.° s. E;r". .,. �1a. aSrY b�t 9i t" �. R F: 1rY :t� <� :t. ��ki"w'.� a_..iC i GA 4 C wi�c u Cat cea m' a1 h '.��"�a�. sii.s':i:`Er.,,l1�' r c��a � ..,,. .1.*:. t•'�''i Z.,6.lie�i, F3:y'e:::f.iFr�'.> g:�c: ,.'grCSi;1't`d'a , v .:^` o, .,..,a 2 f. .�.,7. r<a hZR,,;•sS 2 ,y �:a�.iio �..:�:ulte?C ti . cr�t� sS. .i.aac �Y' tbt l�.a.,f. �a�I a �. r� f,ra .. • i.a is 3+ 1 � m ' ��. a.. �S�ti: a: `n+' i,. �.'t>.a E'd L? K l"+:ia 1.'.13 '. L/N: �'i. 1.1 b.� F d to .f.5��'';; '? ie s.C':' r,. C . � _t ;�• . ry � i •• y.�5 sir`'-y €�:..; �,..,.,i�'....� r. 9JR;S=Si;� c � Ly :,� xi'.sr. - \ wt''1. at.7cap. t-,h •ule, a b. }� y t . ?'• , rg e".a�}..> v•i�i. aSwtd F c »' ).,*,o ' 4A�SSi . �rs`� to s h,ab:i5i, c� .u. �L •�:� Ch a> �.J ". <: 3 • NN``++33 ••�� and pp.. [ (r� q F e n`.� >�, . (gyp 1 •. �#iJ>s a�i2d Y who V� F.. >�,M. ♦iil.�. ai•A 'Fv t�ln.l,GA. !m O �",' hd k. Gzi+ p,��c. %l 0 pm a °..3•',s,t,:°'„:$•:a «4 In, t3�1„v C r.: a .sri. €�da. ii..1�°:J�+•Y. .thawrs i s.:.,pyM1./ 3'.iil this. L'7.'C:'p.o sF..,%,a; la yFt '�'I6 Ei ,.d.? artda «o a.• &P:iT� i3�^3� ��+ s� , .�1 i:> f.daa° ; "x,...�:fb iti�ti"i ba 3A a:eiSt.2 on was mvxC: c by s`�.E :r° C;''.'a S �.c Fi ria. � d: pax..d se coa doell by .ii S . rr'.o C:101.36 ' h4_1y y 6:eS.�.�,�iC: S2':::E;XID.W . 1:2i.:.y. 'i EsE3 9hiG�ii;Ji £i .°�' i'arip2 C3R3•ed. Flect :�.'s3:� 6�". 05"ad RXGU.dAb% Pa.aAi3 ,:NG t�4.61s '3r 1.14, �..�'An The ,; •-R ra rm%' r� o ram' g was � � 'Co order by Ch., �U a� �,`a n2 �.e.c].�aI3 J.X�t E:;C,ts"d ..;.u+;a .C'�3'E i4y• a.a9.x`t 1 �S]� -sib. CCU �:l.S,:ai,.., t �.n M•t n T i 7 c ,],, "b as •]n•. .., q�P � .• :y,4r7,. _ � 2,.f. �. !. Nick r' "S r.4at r•5• The :s:4?.a,.r,K`�.5�'3.�'°i.€� �;u...Y[A.: ..a..� �tf3'e (.. •_ C . l"•:a r,..i .:/c�.t:1 �...a. t]a.t �, ,� �`$ t +e::i'r �. e...a L, dJ g N$.'-.d aiol.l oitRbrack A Je_r y INLfi chE."v g Mal $'`TiacA l'.3 na N 1102"1 Y ooxaaan y F;xni V.I R:ani .Al �« �.G. jCQ �.� �3.• .ai? : r�%J a:7,as 'E:l.ft t,fi'I YL'� yawrrsp_-wspLi pa.'.gL 2 of t22 I-;.r:3,y p 1975,, :�i.c•..a..�c.wt�M1; to aCad.� Ei:C•lce3.o.-u '{'.f'-as ma',de Iby yam and by c'ud mC1 to Mlasi;e;, "alwx inc'lud ~ phasing plan, p pa-1 .sing p an p 0112 land, and land costs if D a x"n Council do, q ;iLot' do :t �. °�c.'IAS to. i?t'''.. Cc:'`° 1 S .t� ,t �.c.. RF.lh L�1 � 4:". �+m n J� ' '� ::6 1Q.�`. �i ,.3 'S C: he"m ng R` n '� ';�� ,-] ti f.,� :?iv •. p 97 5 y :P. .S: �:i°a!a c ;r"a :a.Y..a, cwati aZ R,. �31:. liloot: JLTina.or High School. P.Ia;uIrling E'.°e.:;f.+�"u� �'y»a: �,��A3 �. PR�`t.:d. azad tea a�� G3�ia:t.�a�L �7,v R s'" i 7 City L ' � `,R .7 .; :] C C ,. S M . :12 F. e t � � � .'�.:��.a::-11...aF�:].e'�<:Se ......�..� %R(7,.��,,.,.�.ab .�i.At»l �,b,iT w�'l..a�....s, e;�%�,: 1.Y3�'JLc..�� ;.� �.J,.z.. �+.a2 �.Ei i.eAv:. Ptna Iia hearing. V:oi:iax'1 �'�E'S•:"�1.7..da.1`�'i�9�T.�a��A :wo�i°�w'.BonCDZ34�'.��a i i motion n waz made N b mall. Q � a " d �'.r `� " s3� i '. ^,. o .t �' 1�'sa,.�f;.J,a��Li"`1e�9 r�;l..�.� ��..'G.^a'itl'..C;i. 'L��re k �°v.r�'ar 1 ti-ILIru MEly 2 a .�L.J9}A 5 .�.:di{EWa:3.n � �=tRTua..� ,:i.daA minutes. R� 3 c:r3'ti. k ��.�• AaC'L.tR%aA V 'Irl wn a°.�'�,?f'�r'i..g u�.x:d ►xya FttF 5.'�,`etA%::d to the P a.as,3isl.�.ng �.t�213:"Ctissl t'�:AO • R 1 ^s^ rsl'7 N ... v'E f J ,Y• 2'° « � ,n+ J fo eyr acne^] r •ar-.a'n �i.no M u ;• .'r(na�. '�rat..w. _ .� A .T�. i•.t;+ �:o�a e: z : ��,n. A. a vaR�.�. present <.�•,�:a2'�, � �R�� .;y...,.,�.,. �+ I:. �i'•F �'Crl::�...e.rr,J�%�f7sn2ti.;J to s3u:.LlCa ee G.i.t.plo:C vi'�,: ,105 WG.;3'... 1'��'�.x. Lw•��:�'`r::'R;,r] IT.-hu li'm r a,.,. Y �.a'3 zoned, .b'•• 1. lS C,s'`s.aP I .�.zi 3� e'a: �;ra'tbiti:3 .h� .�i� on i%�... • f:�saiS 'mo C? .G::it ilia V.fr" :'+i:.. 9 a'd i, Z;? dC`vr t.t3pzed as a low Q,1aGa.s alit y land 9.Y2x;,.,o '.kha .�.o-,e: ,.w J�::eh�i:� i �� x,Q=.r^�L:��o Ha :_YCE.ls d a�?.l�t:,:: ..si.."w"Id t the �T..::�tr: �3.;.rY.�J.xi,.:";j ac s.�t..;�gle fvru k.lv hoynv',z o � The b^'.� �'�nni'''.vi j �,:C:�9?i LL w .C.i 0.iBRIrE,t U�, C�i. dar C public AZt:i..�'�517 6.o a.];...,3t b'E!::'E.Cj��c�.bG�od v�:n7e,t.�,�u��io� :sabC y .e Q,F iMtx31 EA $,' `3t:.i 'i:h is Ai' �caF'.�.t i1A' S irrG'3u:i: J �.l'2Ci :r].A'� �r-�.w¢. ]�'�.R, th a ' a «rl�a3 i S.te'ii„ iila a S�'. ic'k .efs wl at edi 't hciy e,2 a awZ.a:f?: of tpx'Ao M"S'u7o pro ;; LcIL .s "4% ..••�.��rr]] q>' ¢� Y9 1� 4 ]S i-7 • Y.'Q' ; 1 �;,] r`c�l� P^��-q ^J•tFy k�/� >4 �Y O 1ca Man }� n pyO •� 4G� v�.4�iSfl Vl� s✓ R.=i "WY �L: :..•�°' r.i�. 81. Jn.S.4.: S.Aa. +J. a6i•H. �:�}.dId ae Lr arGldc `o .0 A�J..r.'� I.i1� Mq]iG.d l-.. a' « �!:ov�.d�.':; n har-:�: ing 't. o c�?n s.1 ilai ra c.o��' �'.u2aj� :! G C b%?i ��' 3 . 'r.�� •' 2 f3:i July 90, 1 9 ,4 •a p ._ ..4:• to a a61 o Q�•c,.A.Q�r� �3.°a�::'tm i%l:' s! cy7:G y ,y {'')+R �r•�p �i .•n ,�]✓•'; �y'{ •. tit •�. ( refry j-] :el;v •.-,;. 7.a 7 . 14._ L .. S _S S, .v,�. �• 7.:. ..i! 1..:.0 P AS't.T_•a. N's ��✓'O"N'7. I o.i�'JAti AV'. e"32td i Ad :iii• LY.fu 6. d. rJ �•: �?.C. b:,nJPi:i `' t tu4.d _ c :�:, is s �'T F.. din � co aC�,i A c ��.n.H uC.'�.i°uV.+�n.;:. a� ,y i�.a a aka@ . tr..� 3. s.Ez y R. t . :#. sx.,. Z.x..dd a'w:3.r� i f..{a mia4' c.73L.a: F•.d}' F r, a< t t R e- c x ,, A},I�}'gw."3, �A's'". �. :�..J�..��i�� won ...s;,;�2.i7..'a t3ti'�:; �{�'u ...4'Loy �.a::tti'.e,,,Z. �,'.� ��7 S..�Ae1i�t:... �.�y,.�D.;�+�.^.�.�3e..c-.a, t5 e•�9 v ']n ."'] 3 `� .y ? 14T � 4 '1 „1•r e S^^f✓ w 7 .. t;..q,r.. .l;y o' 77,, � -will ��'! � t R��`i'�xa A9;ti�p .�, ��iG.tat'�.;.� 1}.'f"1. 'i� '�. E.':l�J.L ♦b t'•;,.aJ 5T,4. �.d. r. C...' `a Si �n'.}.. �.i �+. �}. r<�o.+ C.-7 1 • 1, R+A }} r['t: ��- v d yy�:v' x. q� i 0-ilk e- °s �ych5+ oo l will . ..be. 4:r `?? et;� by c"� �r�'.?il. =.�.�'�'«. r„�. Fi' �.,�' � r'�Y.r LC.S �Spr�.r JL a. rr7' .C"�'-.rwi'4: �..."d°.! .jai 1-a- a', aa::eFi�pt-... The. o,haoI w1.11. n*1 :..?:a:'.'•]�J.�•"„IJ.Fx'-'C::Ck vv►:h any sn <^i•+h c�.h"a.°.�d. � �3a..h ongralL ra�..S,.ns 3i3a.:.._LSa .a%w3Zz Jo'w+oOo as W�,S� ;Ac:~§'w'o 3 oy �.ar a.la have a*.ki.diBg aCeC�T"y in 2 COUATIty Td. 1�.L�'i^sue 'City �lL, lam,.-ie " ata�t ;'d this. i�ao"r:'a.a1an ti 'zmt 'G..i'1 ,fs .tr.�'�.'Be yr dA:.`r'.�.�.•Fi.4?a.'k3w . {� iPsa �?''r...at on G m 04 tom' Schoolhave to be a! C;vA.�::d.'�...� 4me d we o 'Cc`n they apply now and 5at �Z ?da'Ii3.ra"8�`y C:S.3XEiA%isNa©i1 June *11.1, 1971E .��.. No one an he Pw.an'ti:t.ng Commission indicated a�„?`3y negative Cva.a: t a, Se14y"m3l:iary academy at. this location ctaCthey C' dfoiFctgeC t as -UP-Plic ant: to proceed to P01VG soft+ o 02 the. technical 13z.. C36?lt mz; on thze oi:iL A.E..'e w Al!"CtO E A, a`''. t�.�l� 144L14721,1 a.F'rf.�7 aDUT [I .L 33 .+D a Doug YYi::Ti1r en wai.`'. ��. o es c'3.i%i:, o Sw�: ljP Z+ a -Iced Edl Rj In � :et w ka�' g i'.�A��e 0 Su report :hey could 5.'3•' t Y:(.x;k1-<)1Y X-ji i.t 4 ,'sd4:411+s.',;::n statedd +i 2� si i ,A4.rL".4w''d'orG not %k 'a- v"i �'n g C07A0 Ar�"'�'+t.'.'n.'.'' ::6.irbs . h,z)y fl± o-a l d a'� 0 Start'. as ;U00 � CIO 13004aD:�bl-0 4aad a4.c�'6�'� tiii �:�n ( � �R :Lrfi�i C.�'';TF�r`d� rpm ad in i lii.u�.:ion t'ms mft8 b M R ,ni y y 3 r ^a • q r+ l^ .S� r�•f ,d i4+. 1�'�C�.4...fn.4, . .. �'��'' f:�. i:+.n x.A4..•4e u°. f'::�.f S,. q",I. cave 4-'DES. ca t�V.?...a x"'I :Adler plan .of Hansen and dY.� w'„y H:��",!'�11.L5'i. u,r.� 5:ts:'..AA}.:��e�. Mi�' A r' t,:f P CY and U &1'40411 Juno 11 11D75 , 1-nit. 't 1ta ;� " x � �v ,.0 �. ra,.e f,,r �., A ...,t;:s aort a �!j @' .rq s� ^ rv� ( �+��q�.r .yl}r g +. y�.�.�iar �:� � !r® �si...G;. .tir..�.�I.�..�:d`a.:: •�r�. iJ +� �oAAFdJI.K'�''i67.1'+ the '�AFJl. �.Rr '6ii L•c_ ' � I '� I.`. P .t la, .'� � d i � •y .; ,may.,, tiv / i':u «'e:'bsL � a.+.� .yL,'G:t.�'Sd'�Su.3 °�'a`�n �, e>l;i. �'s;�''' �v:.'��`1fi � and �:i ..�,YS�..').�.:ati"n emgmiouIi1ta l°' and�l1L.ivr.� .gym r '11'elammexro report- fv 09 9, 1975. i' 1 nal i w�' �l�i �� i€ d's''C "z 2 ¢:x::t;B bro-1'.'4:-p a;ra:% in 1.975 and x.'o.'�ia �o be t lr'om 1975 'i o 11977. � �� .f 3Ai ipi a .1:�� a .� �:3ti « ': �.w3 . approved. �.xaG� Schoell j1g4','.W +tin i .I G.Ly .C, C;:e ASY:+m" "aiNCrh& going to a 15 1.4.+y Cr radius, O 4110 s"ho ld �+rti,.Lt & recom.dn in the setback 11:. CYY:ld, .dPx 3:4 ke;p-.theton Jsd. siii�$ZMC t, on goo-.: a"�..; ,.'''�' <:t� • i.t,,ii�.k.l L,t4 @ ne'a'r``55} I� l'e f+t,^ .y r^ '1 ^e•.... ,., v you ' i / ;.%`..P,ga.C1 .s9 �..+Ls e. a A br l PO:).'6.r d 1.4�,+.d. t rm- 311 � 1-0 d 5 , t .a b. u b T,di .J' C� ;l ql;, L�:.�".E y ^R -�•+. a�"`" r,.�t j� ,Ga y7 i Y. a .�v�e y + /e'. 'j MR° S .F.�k• s i,E. lw Cr 1, ea{t:.w 4r4::Kfi 6:3 I t,s6; :�Z1 : Sr ' Nk.o. {..i:�yy C� 1:ti ui w3fvtEu d w h.,,, �.`.'a . �'.► ."' d 4r�x 3' ors S"Chit' y 0.141"' the ex.„'9 a: Geis w.>x rb1c%a. �.lb a,1 b .rkl 11 c'J'ao made-, '.by Rud nd(u, � � �d2+ i a4b�i. cg ' ' o q b W 7' '�,T, w.. tz ti t- t el M ' � S'dli�-i. ....ia.�.n Ba�+',+� bJrs' lb..�,.a� bt:�'trL � C...a 6.�K4,k� my3� OrD Lon and ti' a e-r. 'vray problem be :i 3 2-M-died by he City f ;1fi, fi!3e�3se� a 3'epap ,t ri.'..a'+ `^-he City C:'oY:tP3..,..,k :k:r+"Jy w^cti©q. TA�.^.OY.4. w'S Kh ,`-.l rf.'.e�, t'�..b:✓ i. Stl '•a h. : 't ,�},� g '•*" .x.x pb�"r>h."4r�°�� wS 1 s�J�n46�1�.. w"id. 9'.�. �w '7606 .�.f �. A.'i�.. ,E'�.w{�w��'�.YA�r J' ;s $3�.i 0 P J'ZY:3.�i�a.'` s ' two parcels. d3'�k5,'a".d,:3 t� o ""%fi d "'r +. bwo Aida ..ao �:;.,.rn,J harea . a motion on Tw B pmade by Vivian an .�+e''i1� �:j n.'i:�nd a,;;t"� zA S a`-:c4.9zd d by 5ht�t 4Y ��<r4i',�U.a,.�.. A�.aa. ;.Q.;Yr jT .lM' .rid is 1971,45 �. it'a�. S0:30 P.M. to Canruide-% the lot �$e City Council ^� T',"'; 'fa d 3 public +A x• :�.� fxt.t:: S`iis'fw,..,.`s'Eiy,.� c':. �y�.rG3r:;La:f�i Z7k3 ,,�, ;,1.:: :s'a,• 7 .v. 'J':�+ n+ �:�s �r`W'nua;. mii .. �`fR� Vacation %t :d,�: a,:,. �M cu�� :3'i38.: '3 i'9:� :tom O wzx made by Dan w7 it w.. 5 A . d76 G,n'a. Y"w 0cl. ti. is aVR N he LL to.�1 '.•G S ¢. i.i r,4ir� "coan "a '.c l c afnc etUCn Point and r. crag +. 5 considered fi,".� a v r^ �G�:?z;e 'moo b . C: �.e1.;.a�.�ter � by �.;.,ia City c"�:+"n%ino k,11 a e. the u5ui:'1li "c Lt':afri3;.Cy . C.6,`�x.'�,' F.'.�, A ?, [:.'ip .- Fr.L,'ty 1"t. ' 'n? `Xti*" �. r v ;. � 'd 7 ,�.. t73'h .li�.r � .�.c:.%1�:�.4:.. �. «..,,i �o..v.i.�'.s5'iQ�f."t '�.�F� �:9,i.�.?'it ��ad _,x��. f mxcmx a N »i!i is a-yomlna .:., Jonathan Induatrial `la'.: x i x, . a a�be7 33�.a t`3a..,. 'iov.c z R. t; v., ,• r%3 ..�# 'i, iia Council. 'd7zz �.l.adp. by, Dan S� ' q s i' R"'� •'"t �:'"+•'+ T. � 4 v Tom V a*C0 ^� �+� . e .d �:%:a. 33.:t � and ,roa,.'i.�n:,.i;,.'l.. f� �F r.+nil �:4r a i�'iwf(� ..3e7.4aF'.�kf 4n +lrz�mdsnio '1 to time city cz)uncil that s letter bo pir�..de 9...fiu�.:�.t°`t. y n n c:o �'a?"�. y R.,�b Chaska,, c�.'.o='. 9ru.+iA�, t�'1G1�. SCHOELL & MAOSON. INC. MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Erosion & Siltation Waterway, Lot 12, Auditors Sub- division No. 2 TO: File- Hansen & Klinglehutz Laredo Lane PUB DATE: June 11, 1975 FROM: W. J. Brezinsky We have been advised of the homeowners concern of erosion of the Lot 12, waterway and siltation of Lotus Lake at its outlet. This concern is intensified by the proposed Hansen & Klingelhutz PUD. The waterway in question drains approximately 77 acres including: 60 acres west of Frontier Trail through.the Western Hills storm sewer and two corrogated metal culverts; and 17 acres east of Frontier through direct runoff and a tribuary creek from the south - On Friday, May 30, we walked the alignment and took several photographs which indicates the extent of erosion and siltation. These photos were taken at the approximate locations indicated on the attached Western Hills Storm Sewer•Plan 6304-2 and shows the following: Photo 1. The inlet of the 36" CMP under Frontier Trail. Very little erosion It 2. The outlet of the 36" CMP under Frontier Trail. Again very little erosion. " 3 The outlet of 48" RCP, the 20' long rip -rap concrete basin and 20' diameter siltation pond. Flow from -the pond is restricted by the narrow rock-damed outlet. As evidenced by the Photo, a considerable amount of fine material has been deposited in the pond area. 4 Silt, sand and gravel deposited, and curve of waterway. H 5 Erosion of bank further downstream. Rip -rap placed by someone presumable to retard erosion. " 6 Erosion of bank near photo #5 if 7-8 Trees and brush in bed of waterway It 9-10 Outlet to Lotus Lake -sand and silt deposited in lake. Delta 25-30' into lake south of outlet. Lotus Lake level appears to be about 1' above normal, due to recent excessive rainfall. MEMORANDUM Page 2 June 11, 1915 It is evident considerable erosion and siltation has taken place. The sand, gravel, and some of the finer material has come from the roads through the storm sewer and directly from Frontier Trail. Much of the finer material has come from the banks of the waterway itself. Development of the drainage area will result in additional erosion and siltation. We .suggest the following to alleviate the problem: 1. The settling pond at the outlet of the 48' RCP be deepened and a 2-foot high timber ditch check be installed at its outlet. 2. A series of 3 or 4 additional ditch checks be in- stalled downstream of the settling pond. A. small section of V pipe installed through the ditch check to slowly drain the water. 3. The trees and brush should be removed from the water- way. The ditch checks will slow the velocity Of flow so that suspended solid matter will be deposited behind the checks and retard erosion. The exact location± and number of checks rep. quired will require more detailed study. _ The cost of this project if Let for construction would be about $1,800. The cost of removing material deposited in the Lake, an additional $500. it is possible that the City forces could do the job at less cost than above, if the job was contracted out, de- pending upon their available time. IIJBrezinsky ,jO�-UTION o. 4: Q 1776-1976 CITY OF CHANHASHN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE*P 0. BOX 1479CHANHASSEN, MINN ESOTA 55317o(612) 474-8885 MEMORANDUM DATE: June 6, 1975 FROM: Bruce Pankonin, City Planner TO: Planning Commission, City Attorney, City Engineer, and Hansen/Klingelhutz SUBJ: Proposed Hansen/Klingelhutz Subdivision, Western Hills PRD Planning Report 1. A public hearing was duly ordered and published per Ordinance 47. 2. Adjacent property owners within 350 feet were duly notified per Ordinance 47. 3. Please refer to enclosure 6 (Administrative Procedures) and note that we are at Step 7, public hearing. 4. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission should make its recommendation to the City Council which may include: a. Approval of the preliminary development plan. b. Disapproval of the preliminary development plan stating reasons for the disapproval. c. Approval of the preliminary development plan subject to specified modifications and conditions. 5. The Planning Commission shall recommend a written time schedule (presuming the PRD is approved) for development, and specify a time limit which a final development plan of all units within the project shall" -be filed with the Zoning Administrator for submission to the Planning Commission and the City Council. PLANNER'S RECOMMENDATION: I feel the proposed PRD would be an asset to the City of Chanhassen and would provide a level of development compatible with adjacent land use in conformance with the City Plan. The applicant should also be required to submit final development plan document, to the City, within 6 months of preliminary development plan approval by the City. ,jpLUTION o. 1776-1976 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O. BOX 1476CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317*(612) 474-8885 MEMORANDUM DATE: June 6, 1975 FROM: Bruce Pankonin, City Planner TO: Planning Commission, City Attorney, City Engineer and Hansen/Klingelhutz SUBJ: Proposed Hansen/Klingelhutz Subdivision, Western Hills PRD The following enclosures should be inserted into your copy of Exhibit 1 Hansen/Klingelhutz Laredo Drive Subdivision file. Enclosure 12. Planning Commission minutes - dated May 14, 1975 13. Planning Commission minutes - dated May 28, 1975 14. City Planner Report - dated Junei 1975 %S 16, �f rZ-GULAR' a.:SiiM.d'•.J .0lv PMY'.it. ING MAY 28p 1903 i:'7-n.T •-., •°1 ns. P) \ •"A N p'e miss - St T.2'�,••'• j 4: ..: ,o callad R ' S '� `^ •'i a.xnc. .i��•;��ka�.u3.�, x c�ai3A"x�.a,.� t.a�°ot:e"'�.:a.di�..�C3F'. i35.�.:t�..,i'z�� 7Y.� 6:ci...,�»F Si '�a"»i �:�'4�t;� � �°s rvd.:ai1 ?:"a 3iie ..'03- of43.ng air yzmh a vet re T. tr. �l:&i'�i' c:+_ic i>Jti.Ei?a :i d f3ai::c t, o"! V e.;. LVdL'iw... p 4S m 1`3.il•alldDan f31;.: rE.. w 4. o E..,i;. VY ••.t • c-, 9•;-a ... s .i-..,". °'1�ry, pans Yn. �i �.."-ns p� �;a'b�ac:.s.c.a �: �.�ir'�.�a3. v� �,.�a�5.�.,hs4: utt-.�:r also ;a�. ,.�•.....�:o Tl .t . t C`, � ••.S ar ... f r. A Z.. +,'� � 7. y i�' °b J. .e �5��.u;diR `.u1a., »i�atse.i;. A�Sv' t..�:ia{`='��.a :trs;A. .�,""a.ae�;��.t`�:`C �.:5'A�i u�i'�`� ;.2.C.:� xr� a.�;. �•�`� _»''1 ^•ts ^;1 " '3 6S^l X..S 'a.";, �:Y "1 T' y. ti (M^ �y• • e•uts�,:.,�! �a Ri... to fap, rove the Rzmu 1;, h lat.b'in�...<e .%Z; � l�.k "Lie '7Llk 6:."i,%, , 6:3I L wt 4GS Qa. i't.d`!� .,%l ii"O. on was made by Tom, Noonan and ;:fc:.��a'"3a� r.:�c P~ by Mnel"-.+ n 'Zo E,«�'�� a'e ,i:.h(a Gar Carl 00m ��°5."•1b�.ic Flea. ing �'�::� c�y:AF:ez 0L 11-lav Jkel a .�'�.975 m i} 3�'c,:44v:a , last • r }J D TS..,,..,,.� �.ela n. �a";:::": ?�C� �i'>�Jha under w .E'\ �iJ.., «al.. T 1 r;• 1 . l "• " 3 yTM"p 4j • 1 A ti r T n ,• ' •.n a F. :�:.ei c',2��3 � sx�j' �. p � d ar? , . c,t::.S't:.�.„'ss„� �ti.�r1�`::� ,•�:•t,�.°i[3 -�+ ++.'•'r •l ... r n^ 4N ..a , � 3 2 - L•o s: a-; � cry, T p l�.d.aic .�.�...Ctii:. �� 7:s s3 r'S:�7W l:. 3;. .'"°4:�.�.:"'la_;s.., u r;� .SLa•_ ; �e:`� .•.3i. 6t �P�.+3 p �S�iSsti a. `? iLw n�'_Fs,4 �3 �Ac; ��;� a}C) w �' i'.w,. gP £'�3.�' cam. i:kf 1 C :t` fi d ..y E what n, n - n w w r.- 'nod F'� : � Zoo,,'; a � ,'� � i.".a ti^ ? � •�,��:`Fa �33. each .0 �.C�.�.• tl�.�,�'�� .� s„,E�,:.: b; Id na cz, :5: �. .t.�.•a 5..;v�34c.z"ti3...71 .. L`3k: e:r�,.s.%:f "s;,s You: : could hCr'�i�.re a five f cot snow storage t ('tL oZ r-; .. .�.,.t^.S .y T.. y' �.. ^"5Ta T -,m , k,�. :re51"W_a 's�iLy: t.l.C��3•''�, �Lnd'- .» s�.�'�'r�'J�:.�-,ua� � r.:,L ��:.i''s4..r�l.kas t.�G, P' ;sua�f ��A �:�� s:ki`' Eji s �.;�rLf `.� `. E�.F 'i��J.A L Rr A rRP:L 't ' '•Yw u C �r , d �� l .�+ p.y .., .'�.: l r y, rj a'L s •;� .f� :'is, '.2iil Ti1:f.i�V;s:, �s dd� :�'isri.o .-� ?'ti�i J'.'l�"'L L'n, s.: �ir:'a.�..�;' �. ri.::.,.,� i'�s" >:s•1 �'.,yi iF'� c:L'S'S»'d ,`e ; F f 7 4 y 4� >. q .5. a 4'2f`A.��:�1 ai is2� 1u..3ti::r'sAc:d,a,! c.0 To.2,;�:Ja +"3 ?FP•csC:;:ix`: e`•.'� C?'.e�.�.3.ly S aelc �i y• n, i s�.f:: l.a' l.�`�y " 3 ,:- � o ,� ��57+k`. �L.�e,::�.:t�C)' �.i�iF� f».5,...� "v°i:� aA (».L3.4.:. .�'m�;,.b th, 'uba Motion u7fI.d'an j itior:o l y 4 sn 5 '� '� v 4 ,'-t4" s r^.. ,n •v, r. a T:"3 "pia � . C^ 5�9 t ti� ^� r r". c�. �,raekt ayl �i�`riic..:k, �,y rr€ w : �+ l; e-'he aand a,ec J d.,_ t a�'� oni 141'1::"s�i 3:.n _ o ap..?a�zli� �. y�;- ' � " `' '- ' C »a�mgar ' o n r ° w '"r s c 6, 1 9 � � l> a,3, ;S„ 1•"a�i�i, �xv.paS!?y' j'.jf. sp"�g�q'i.1L$S'�'� ay,,o' �g2axb I`'.'yv > �'I'�...��h:a G..� o:+ «.). ). i,'t559 .Y. �.. y ®..) g W.1i[.8.4t'�n,t... i-ou LJl . Eapp-6-vc:id. :`'a.•..__n1^�`'«:bsD ''.Z,.:,7. Dom, �C6j�ti ��'Gw:c:)G`e "5 .AA �, ��A� ? '�:s:ovaL t-.,�: t;.% k'iit3�is,•�l v.,,�?`"•. St ai1�r.�ayS."6 �I'L't w'`':y:a�a��?3a by cl "nvjJ':P2�� .�.. �y o,...:11,s:�,AL� r. �. r � G S 2'�.,oa A; o , he, of atl.6%ao The is lS cail:tS4 the RT, 02. also {+�� i.''.SS.:ly'o�5., ^,� the t4:•1n.)co ."L j5•i r.5.8• ts`, �i�f 4.� �a:. 1.i1,\ '. O 9 • L°�� ,.J 4I J.I I.• ALl4,✓`'Y .�s 6.S�+ 'Yu .3..+ �il..L. G.i w.+ F'{ L•8'.41;".5 �Wda lht�: was YS.�',S:w�4Sti: �3 ::> �i'i°'wL.i P la+' (ba i :',..:C3i:'�t.:C:t °d3�1' �� :x:.:l. ��g3li.3L:, , ' TT i.^1'';,„'`' ,�fitt o `'eCwb..Wti c.�:.: „t 'k Ll`49 Council z:�,�) mil% a a 'a y '� a• •P�6 g t' 3 Ji; a ,. P +. �+ k. �:.x'Ac '�. `2 n � c:?r3 k:°e3�tl4'ri;t�x.'E :9� ?�5d�'�:�.v+SZ LAicsai:�.kl,:��'�:a: s""iia.•...•.,li�:..;1. !y�� PAR" e •�"• �"' °'i 4'�,.�. C7�(•,."AY- �'31...4.°'�''°•��o.--' ..a1..1 ti�.4.t.1:'t�G�''.1:`�(.• :.n;fl:y'� .[ ` .Yr'..•��: '�.c.YltiL'1 Pd i�,1.iY: , .�'. r�•L'. �:{;,�2. �. r�'�:1�'.�.'�, ,7 ,�.'Zt�i•i�� , a,, Y3r.,1:�. L�5'','a . -..i-v �, •�, - f-'a °v .-,b. �e p ° r,, C'f6'' i+�: o i '(i•' r••,; v •-a �•3,3$�r`3'�4;��S.ad1 b ...{�.'��..,,it�.; �'Z iI. S....,...,b r.. p �.J'.;... ��i:�.W �"e.P..rai.'�ua yC... z, L`'...�l; u;:i.Y.�t,9-F�.4•a T'o�ra pq° •x- -3 r'.+, ''' Pv '•a �fi,,!�� q�i�••;^q �.h Rr+. ria eq �Sm ��S ,�.t, i, c g •. i. '7^.��+ ... .�?�,y. ary:. A_�:.�' ��: 4�x1 c �� u-i10 a.a"i�asb1 Nov�%Z3�� y Wok kr: sbi:ifa:�l�t r_ g . e�:13�L Gti .� �> ��?��i!3 P,.�3r �v'� a: The Ir u in fo_ ¢a :m s 9 i s"'. 's°e a l C inn' s on t -hi e, a : •�- .'° ;j .m.�,..,:r �a r a l p ',. 5 ,a .: .c �,� Y• .'E n.^ ; re.(,., •q c.� . �Lk „t.wa.d� � ��d„�. �:.�,�..,73 S::SF: e:t a ��:3..;.:i%c ., a.,�ca�: � 5i.;sG:� , .4.'6. �.:J,�',. :3.i'�' rd...,.il t,,.t1,ti'. i;+�tv" s.5:c, .p, •n ++�� •' TT•.�� yy p., •} �3 r•• tl<, C ((�� 99 t r•,^ 3'� p p `] �� ` {ry �u "° ^, •'v+� 7 t. �/�� q ^ 1 `t . '"e "7 L".. (:M1�l:.1.C».l µ'4•�• A. L'L 'v1AY.YSul.LC:i..3 LrY �:AIIO .t "lere G� 4'Y .�. a�.. eL tY'w r�db 1�:.�ul�.s E�'1r at.'a['w�5:".id'. P�ri4 �..s lwtil. E�bT.u. �,...1 around !afaka M..b.nnGvPc sh,'(-.za con 5TmAle r, at.. .sa;?tC�'w L"?u ;7 Wool: ofi :�3tii� Z. a �..� c 5 �� L` :Boa mGi rs';�:37.igpsoil -presented h "*, :� , i �:t �' n�.i.5�i'Z !.h ;p r5K5`;�:►, l� :•'` ' • .:",' j.,''.G�'.1•FS a. i tleF e cl,.:'f ..r. aw i sTh and � �• vp�5 .,� •�,..• �.. •' i ^.l-... rsr ., 6.'t ^', , ., .? %' «.$." .t's,:.:s• 2�,. hJt4'� ;;y4� Jcit�n'3 & S�.•.:, i� C.ris l:z..»�i&»',o�.f+ .fb� L=+ i'•:+`�i�y .l'.. u.i.A.L.6e��; bu +iclr b7o atlaunching, y• !.�.. rE.i.9. .mid Cyr, a, l5:,''w y SA3'S.s�d. .1M1., 'i.S.i>�w u�..� �, 6.Aw C ,..,., .. �,,. 0" iZ6:?." a .c r it a r• f ::.,F.'� a v «' ^ '`a+• f� lr L °':!"� 'd DayG?L. `wa„ 2;Jl .thin �f ,dilly IOAM1.azC4 �.n4 CT,"iJibA�:S:`y rS"d'. 4n.;�f'»�.:w ��, ear.+ .,u i'i°.s'Fa? 'udai'��c::„W:� `" f i W � t. r:�..�. u c r .CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE OF PRELIMINARY IMPROVEMENT HEARING STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. , COUNTY OF -CARVER! ) Barry Brooks-,- Clerk Administrator , being first duly sworn, on oath deposes and says that he is and was on May 19 ', 19 75 , the duly qualified and acting City Clerk -Administrator of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date he caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of hearing on a Pr000sed Preliminary Development Plan for Hansen/ _ improvement in Klingelhutz the City to the owner of'. each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed for said improvement as set forth in said notice, by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the 'United States mails with postage fully prepaid thereon; that .the, names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by 'he records of the County 'Treasurer of Carver County, Minnesota_...and.bv, other.aDorooriate rec:ords.._...,.. ,....,.,._,._ ... r Ba ry Broo - Clerk,,Administrator Subscribed and sworn to before me this day Nb1 q{[Y PU PLHU sire rz� ' h7iiYN�soTi, _ (�1RVEr; CCiIfVTy.' YSiorr Expires J6' 30: 1:981 Nat Public OLUTION e/ GPI CF2� Q ( r 1776-1976 CITY OF 6KANHAHEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE W P.O. BOX 147oCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317*(612) 474-8885 May 16, 1975 Carver County Herald Chaska, Minnesota, 55318 Re: Chanhassen Legal Gentlemen: Please publish the enclosed legal notice of public hearing in the May 22, 1975 edition of the Carver County Herald. Also, please furnish Chanhassen with your usual statement of charges and affidavit of publication. Very Truly yours, Bruce Pankonin City Planner Enc. (1) CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA "NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR HANSEN/KLINGELHUTZ DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA" NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That the Planning Commission of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, will meet on Wednesday, the llth day of June, 1975, at 7:30.o'clock P.M. at the City Hall, 7610 Laredo Drive, Chanhassen, Minnesota, for the purpose of holding a Public Hearing on a proposed Preliminary Development Plan for Hansen/Klingelhutz Development Corporation and involving the following described 5.53+ acre tract of land: "Outlot C, Western Hills Second Addition" A plan showing said proposed preliminary development plan is avail- able for inspection at the City Hall. All persons interested may appear and be heard at said time and place. By Order of the Planning Commission /s/ Bruce Pankonin Zoning Administrator Dated: May 15, 1975 (Publish May 22, 1975 in the Carver County Herald) zal.na Coo.. A madazion Mutes May 14, 1975 "WZ CARLSON LOT SPLIT: A Motion was Made by Hick Uhritc =4 seccrK. 7 reco F! the City Wunoil approve this lot split Sol! inner' S recammeodations of May 8, 1975, regarding straot tlte question Q the legal description be revolv0d. WOO P92UNINARY DEVCLOPMENT PLAN' - HANSEN JND WINGELHUTA. nEw"s were PrOST07 The City Bmgire,3z recancne.nds in hic Terser at Ma; the =Ziug ozf the cul-de-sacs bq Wareasea to 30 M l et, 45 1 Xul1 50 foot radius vauld leave ten 10 property line for snow sEoraga. . ! PreAnsky guve the EnAneer's report of May 9, Wn. Thn .'7monswaod that the lot line between lots I and 8 Do v,iv!a,wn ne Montage of the two lot, The.deninage for tha envir jubd .�W exception of Lots 7 and 8 will be to she north coo -do 36o .-9,naer nuggests that four catch basins he installed on the nt, ;�c zod nn 18 inch pipe be installed from the cul-de-sac oo Scis AW? an Iroquois. He further suggested that the gi Y 'N Wet above the gutter line. K�. Taw~s stated they would like to not enlarge the rig"n-01-00 1 an!-wv-saa bauausa K will make the lots qaiza SW. �&, . 06 sits double fronLage. They have worked o4y 8 7AWs- Y nf.. "winqvand fences on the zear property line. :hv C , wn3n�!, poosibly part qn right-K-way prcpetV QN0. Wran to six Met high. mz. VMS svel-K 141L n� 7aL with the philosop-hy 'iiar bw.L , :no.w-o" w, QqKbutz twat is how do you build Soo P16CIA. into. The enumann, �npo nL o;r�, AT9 per nome over and anave an zinn.in our Pat Wem in. Tae ho"Ses V=j U nx* NCO Un .050 sqaare fent. The louses sLe 6. 51;nn& b,;! buLit nickel at too swnt.x Y 1p- If we bnva a smaller ranKs with snow picwxng and Won ann an plow will hit and wyech tpi� .Onarotn curb. -1 VU the ny i "v -sac dusiq - zmaller on_-Ct-saa 6 0 S rp 1 vow i n; V" q i:�'':GU°3,ta'AA PLANNING COMMISSION 1.'Assi,aEZN: G. 14UNY 20, 19 7 ;S :vr'if?e _. gsi,jur LalaiS,:us ng Ccl.ta[sii..D': i on ?.iseti .g was called to oxdGr by Chairman D4:'6n id+,. n.`C:.. 4..a Thefollowing g members n? were present: Tom Noonan,Eudnxl :;t r 8 rM ck Pz Ne e � a'.1f; "; . � jr. ., k � fi � but. 7C' aT , _ aXi.Si-�tc-.�. ,a1'�k 4�� s«' ��xE?'w.'t 1.Szis. l�d�;ti .. „�1 tia"�'K,. y 1��[.S� i:1.::a.r_ ,... � c"•:.i2�t '�i'� �.�fs3."l,"'.pia. � t,. 1 7...rR was A..eXia Vivian seCag 15nd wa_ also J W0in ; t �.'..A.: i �Ji-S•. i.l9,�i A motion was rii4.il.i '��••,,��I' !«a ...,�11^Jiw`_..{ �. d by �.1X.i.4 L by � i�i, ,.irq),yi .[�w',./s`r.r��.en .1 �P'q7�,. and � G-, T. •3 ;1 �•a•.. 4uJe a.4., G`W ..1 ..i1 '�i,'� :"'A.,(wXi r•w ��1.f.Af.\i to approve the Ralph H... Pnea,:ki.,u 3..• L'uiJd..3.c Ht3VAA9 .![n1.bZ 4: bd:i i:, of May 14, 1 0 5 . Motion anonymously apprYbicd. P. J':r4a's iRiCkdc"l by t.V0x-n '�{ii9.�..Eiryyc�X4�.c,lt� and �pasJ/.ayR�.;•�o,%wa�.S�'i+"-�`.d ,d y `FiuM:%i".��..�f9 i.i'o`.1..l�:ni��sir'i�l• k ' c• q N p :.7 rove R^ha Gary CC.T,.r�.,J.i:J'L.�n ,L�C,yblic Hearing �3: 1.i.,�4�dla+'�s of May 14, 5n9 59 Motion, nan=wonsly approved. a• { t - [ .. .;y P O,,^5 .q ` .Y{.ry.T � X 71, PY •'�V t'j^ / A.aP P`'j'', T PLAN u-r'.[��, .",+�: ..owl j T. �� paragraph S'Y"` ', ��e'•, ... t,'t�f a�trl��l.�" L' (' i `� l.j �e 4 � �.�iL.�. :iF.•S� �.•: ,a �:.ia «h 4..; ,4 S.J. .'f'r 9'Y. S: .G•.f i6 i•JA.�S�ad �. e,. • t +.. ,S-.r.�„d. A'.n y, lYrG�.i:'�..`. .a a i i d ,�,'. .�.�:!"J.:r �.z'1,:i::..a;�o.s .:�i'rL.S 3.x.�.d.'S.:uGi'.+.�,al.aa.i`^Tx6n in t,raae May 14, 1976, c•.:wmc.•.a'aSion m? ;?`•:;'tS,.C:....i ` o re P4 `[" 'r � .-. the cast s. cul—de—sac ��s^«.,,.sac R �.;, t� •, - � . :AT, . �::.�.. � :b �.:��! i:t¢:i,`tf.t s.�: a:.c s'•�. � �:.. �.'��. ..•.. .. ,. c? ,J�:^: � �� .t-;� k?a w I:,�;�'i..r+iW � [ /: ' u•i n'., L.: a n •,:i Y.^ F,f , 5d 3 eM,t n'➢, s t � � 'ate, having 7 ,. u T' e red i. yt,-...�. �: � �' :'�. n•�k .� fia e�.s. k"Aia:`G .3, *[9 c . �.'. it',4` �,,.: ra 7�-a.iF �; �. c' a., {-"'�.':..?. :i, >s i. Vat 1; t an each sidMr FlctV the""was 3vz foal easement asCeY:around yiLd it. o You 00014 have pse foot :','KLow ::Stti..rrage easement. Amend 'ry e(. t•� �•1 ,". e" T�i4j,.a"' y� .>'1 p•x 'S'. !a 'x r1j r_1 NG < c a e"4 the r e May 0 t i .t.. ir-••::.::;,i.;s. Q,.,,K+.: motion '�.+,.R:CR.S.:,:. }s`',�. 4�. �'i.4.r '..1.%,..,.IY.,K::LA°,.,�a..1:.;.�.5�6]'44- R��.1:..hA��a. ..5:. E,.i� ::�L.� i 105, i L. anni.::tg Coi:.?n:'f n s,:s u Minutes , _ _, q { motion was Made by Mal 71I Js and 0es.iGed y Tom Noonan t o request adY,aal 'uv * ii .>...,.?:"t:. making %i de..i=4:1.ci`typ �.,it'3r•::�.�,F��.y something compatible w:l. s,a� the z. K' .a�'�::,_,;.,t:' .�.,d�...±:iR�.£..'s .r Motion unanimously approved. C3{` t-,, made by ►1'i'rry Neher and seconded by Tom Oy;:t'wtn:?n to 5'"CT+=ta;a;y"o LAW;*galas Planning akiid .kminutes of may 14, 1975, asNotion unanimously Cvp.ove o „ �,v i» -r .rya v. « Skoog, ^a ; e c �+ , R .'• r•, ;-•+„ » e„ .� . `.�; S?'1� �O,lYU, �si.,,l'i92.� ;�}.> I�'C: A��,T,,RI S� Don Sk �3'l...Lr t, N� i ..� ti-0M zaE�tS,'�:6:'.�:>:.. � r {:,i07; 7 �y'.� a , s,. « _ e C;je":eo �o ing e:.4p"p x0' a...,..��t�. remodel del the St 1%d:Avd Oil Station n by the Ksont of the d;tr,«t.i.,1. The ax.»atioLi is located 3.[:.,..f at L°;a'..e a:1W fR`:,:."Y1 �1'w,..,. ,;, i':•�i!,, .�:_. �..�i, R':fi7 -- eG 101 i51.d 5. They will also be ra to. ng -he !Vmo f) .' # 0",ih.e southern end QJ}:: Y,;R'se building. A. �I.. i' : x»y 9 • Mal i e � i ?��., e; ro,. •'ad :i ' r� o �1+;.3'.3'.a" : f. o L o 1 �,'" :i::4`i�,"s.is�'k ui � ,r➢.�}i:.. �J T Sac;.}. i��.;.�. �7iiC'. ��,'Y �[,.....�:a:t2:�t:, � � t' ..t ,Y: .IC::�.t:ts.. ';,,{.I'•:`- Council i'tlt:spi»Give the plans as o7,7br'ttit�..ed. pa (�� x �w1 ;• penS?":.•r i_ ��+w�4��0. 'i,.�:=iA.'i ��.•Cai.�i'!»}.y 2:t �1 s ^. L.Lu BRUPOORD !L1 it:a.G:'^"Qi'7HT.z'9. REGIONAL F3A1`;:^n Pat Murphy, County Pu%r.b..ic aC'ifl.,:'r« & ',: ¢ v z w1 . <4 •,•', ,n r ., _...v. by w. „�. t.... S r.,•...,f� T, ` d ..". .{.Iri..l..(�{.'g a..+,.•.F.. �.J�.t..,,A,l... a �.a.�l.%IEie��.•..tix- �'...«:Ke,�:•'�r"r'�.'$ �.��.�'.::in.p h/i.,.ti..13.1,.'V .� ,,.s.�teG.aA,��,?ti:g <.t^,0.f..',..:0.:.'i. al «:.c:He;[ice s: wwad ar.,:i.,3..:i F C,:k7.1,�,..k Hirt, Rich Lymang ii^»'t: a;:2:=: E3' t :r°hw>`:i•pao%a Ca''�`_al::i l.m an Ne'`;r'ec`''`.5,. R s Dick Datce$[;:'+: p ia?:i•G Gary Mt;" n,r.11y we n :':.;e..a%. :'.i M (. 33.°;,., ry i,. looking !:'�ai: c":i .�.c:sa41:ri :�:;"o�"CChanhassen �3�'i', Y�S•� r:�r,,.,, t�.C',V : ... .". a....b ado d 1 ^ '; °f park and '' tits with i,'•• `�'' • :i a„n„��1;;+ .,. location �.p �,v�3» for a: ci. regional p. x3.,.r s":i:,��. 1. !' .cam S:':.4.'; .., 1. �,e Sz.�, pl anw';.:C?"::t:' in Chi:niP."l v."ten. There will be can informational meeting With t a a; o d Lake M qn rurh t:an aii4 ��Minnetonka N b u ` " A.;„ V :'.,.., F?.v. t.:, Thompson �."T,�I. l;,. �f"�:��h.,•, 1.... b. .n �)};,'.�po..:.•i�•{ park a.. plan. The proposed W.�'u-�� t. k ,, 'ramk ., the '� .fit iM',.�K t �q. ,...,1 .S•'oe Berman M,v s .y r.r., .1 .��:, park ;^..� ...R." Chas —Mar �u a"�i["� c�il�:. :��x,:� "s,�,c....«..�#ala�.i �..�"ii� f��'� Vie.. ��;�'":''.�r,!•x; '��4.0 J'�.. i • i 0- . ".)r F,jY• boat launching, may( ♦yt �' r''f picnic - 1 � � `�. ,r' and nature �.y.. .••e .). is*a F v ,. ,".� �4 /.� IJ �: rbA d,. ,i, r.\4'•S`:.1,,5, ..� � �W �,n e��.L J ��..w '.i� .�.�t. 1]w}'•1 7'... 4.. .... B:: 1Z.�,'i.�• T:"x0p'".;zis;;.i1•. oth3R':a :;cti5;it;?.:;is w:?,l1_ :.n;iciniis t:".nt w,.c;f:C1lp:fi./,4gt;SL ,.n PUjr" .'.3:M4 .�..,...<LF;k.aa•a hill. cross 6,:«'Jun'e+`ry i3ki °«.,ti aiXa p {:afet.3'. snow shoeing trails, he mates Vlay 14, 1975 -i?IarxrA-ng CorfaUssio mi -4- -which thCou-cd taUm-!::y utlncv.ldhftoor&v-- heLafjvti,cou.,C. ,; bt%y it Te p;_blem is hfvw are you goillg tO IlItO a ACUSS. The housa izn"N reallv ILam...'L-Is n paid t.hIZV I"U`:'0- A-1-DIC: ,;ox*I'"-';h more ha.ra "bec'n going *uj...). 112he2. much houo-�' -w'U%LI bz� abl.-e, -to is jiusi-' am meu'C'11 ar.td proposed fox the Ict, It juot "'di.-ves c"'n. t-o bulld, 75�,", Of I.T., now 'a_nel -.';Ih'e ootbc:z 21.4'+is a 1:,Lt Uo. 1).j.. yo'kl a're the bo a made hY as.'czy Neher and Saacoaded by 60cr-11 Nfoo"alain tuo hho"'d' .1 .9. C' � to p'rrapozeiZ of Yune U, 1075, at, 7.3" p.m. klotiozn U;aaxl:�<mously approv'ad. J, , V14 -4 Y)': the rzaast cul-da-sac appea�:G to be a prob1cl"I bo__-�"tu�;fa C'7": onlao--ged five- On if there vras foot ee".zement carom',d ''Co •.'bu could ha-.va a f_,JLV_e voot onmy storaqe eaouraLen16 0 N2, _�" 10% S I "! 71% rz*'otion co 4 v Z) t, " I. ('he Co'cr.,cil that Nick to r. as:v"Oted '?jqF p Nick Vxcf,air, c, o n n 2 4-:� IMvI,.Jx)n ca z Tha Oil I'S "YUE-va .. an'd Pir:.:w-,elCuum .1011vd. o The W11ca JLP_' t1way bad ce'T�I-he%r i"he Plallmlrig o Jericy ��ehej�- tha�t the Co'un'r-d.1 xizea o"ukr.". "Lal. A-w-0- C. zs are zallowed to be I mu by MvImacAlp ne and y Ivfm, 'bram.n o cm eel"lob`�ksecsopsllrijii, om-h.Qng 4-ion unanimous..,��, approved. 1�'ha Mot- .1 Q Oil the, si�IUOX-A is Oil C0MPaxIY'3 new ft nnt tho Counacil appoint TGM z, Uc-" Of Z!'dju.tx'cmts ad,A- iTld Zk,I pp'-c'.als z 'i, an:5 To-m 1'.700nain b 'z t •0IIIIID'XWU�"31C"2. (IR17 1V ON.. *'Y �k s '.%i CC r� Y. nd "has a awcvu�Z4. C'f 7 a. JS 33" 'v Vlal -n- r-, 10f, at niz-,t to in U"" '�ha' haa eva'7f "bc..em kL thVIt 110 kAZS &TA'. re-jzOrt baok ttci tlae _cjOLUTION ,Q, 1776-1976 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O. BOX 1479CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 553179(612) 474-8885 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 9, 1975 FROM: City Planner TO: Planning Commission, City Attorney, City Engineer, and Hansen/Klingelhutz SUBJ: Proposed Hansen/Klingelhutz Preliminary Development Plan REF: Ordinance #47, Section 14.05, Subdivision 4, Preliminary Development Plan Planning Report Background On April 23, 1975, the Planning Commission directed the petitioner to proceed with Preliminary Development Plan for the proposed Laredo Lane PRD. PLANNER'S COMMENTS: 1. All required documents pursuant to Section 14.05, subdivision 4 of Ordinance #47 have been received by the City. 2. All comments regarding storm drainage, street grades, curbs and cul-de-sac radii should be referred to Bill Schoell. 3. An excellent feature of the proposed plan is the landscape concept to screen with berms, decidious and C.oni ferous plantings and fence the entire length of Laredo Drive. This screening should provide a level of privacy for the residents that here. .double frontage lots and should be an asset to the City. The developer should be complimented for a job well done. The developer, should be questioned however, about the caliber of said plantings. 4. The developer should furnish the City Attorney with proposed restrictions and/or covenants to be placed on the subject property. 5. All single family structures as preplanned compatibly relate to the lot on which they will be located. PLANNER'S RECOMMENDATION: Approve Pr f-1 - Development Plan subject to the conditions of the City Engineer and City Attorney. Order Public Hearing pursuant to City Ordinance #47, Section 14.05, subdivision 4C. WILLIAM D. SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON JACK T. VOSLER JAMES R. ORR HAROLD E. DAHLIN LARRY L. HANSON RAYMOND J. JACKSON WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY JACK E. GILL FRANK V. LASKA SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC. ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS (612) 938-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 May 9, City of Chanhassen Planning Cormiss.ion c/o Mr. Bruce Pankonin, City Planner Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Subject: Proposed Laredo Lane PTJD Hansen & Klingelhutz Gentlemen: We have reviewed the proposed Hansen & Kli.ngelhutz subd-i-vision of ®utlot C as shown on the Egan, Field & Nowak plan dated May 5, 1975. Thew sanitary sewer and water systems shown are as recommended in our report of April 16, 1975. The 50-foot right-of-way conforms to ordinance standards, bu the 45-foot cul-de-sac rights -of -way shown are inadeT-late. HoY pv(--�-, we r_ecoug-rend that the required cul-de-sac radius be reduced to 50 feet from the 60 feet required by oz'di.nance. Increasing the cul-ie- sac radius to 50 feet will increase the cul-de-sac lot frontages. We further reconwqend that the lot line between Lots 7 and 8 be relocated to equalize the frontage of these two lots. The final road surface should be 28 feet wide wits: a 40-foot dia.Meter finished cul-de-sacs, Surmountable concrete curb and gutter will be required. With the exception of parts of Lots 7 and 8, runoff from the entire subdivision will flow , to the north cul-de-sac. To accc odate the runoff, we reconmerd the following: 1. Four catch basins be installed on the north cul-de-sacr---- two between Lots 7 and 8, and •tree , other two one lot away each direction. 2 An 18-inch reinforced concrete pipe fro:. the cul-de-sac to the existing 24-inch RC_P on Iroquois. 36 A drainage swa,le be constructed along the alignment of the pipe to accozamodate overland flow. , , recorurer_d acceptance of the proposed P D subject to the Dc Y ` _I oper e z c orlfo?�:i nce to tij% rccc-nanz.nda c.ionn cont'ii..::d here Very truly yours, SCH013LL & -1 uADsc.L , ]_-NC. h ,jO\-UTION A, 1776-1976 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVEOP.O. BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317�(612) 474-8885 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 6, 1975 FROM: Bruce Pankonin, City Planner TO: Planning Commission, City Attorney, City Engineer and Hansen/Klingelhutz SUBJ: Proposed Hansen/Klingelhutz Subdivision, Western Hills PRD The following enclosures should be inserted into your copy of Exhibit one (1) Hansen/Klingelhutz Laredo Drive subdivision file. Enclosure: 5. Community Location Graphic 6. Procedures for Planned Residential Developments (Preliminary draft) 7. Planning Commission minutes - April 23, 1975 8. Petitioner's Report dated May 1, 1975 9. Laredo Lane proposed Preliminary Development Plan 10. City Engineer's Report dated'May 9, 1975 11. City Planner's Report dated May 8, 1975 C 1` ANSEN & KLINGELHUTZ construction, inc. Memo May 1, 1975 TO: Chanhassen Planning Committee FROM: Hansen and Klingelhutz Const., Inc. SUBJECT: Request for "Laredo Lane" P.U.D. approval The following information and data is submitted in support of our request under Section 14 of the Chanhassen zoning ordinance for review and approval of the 21 lot P.U.D. under the name of "Laredo Lane Addition". Legal 'Description, Outlot "C" Western Hills Addition (submitted and approved in 1969) 5.53 acres. Purpose To provide supporting data and understanding relative to the P.U.D. request for the City Council and other Boards and Commissions designated in the Chanhassen review process. Project Identification Ownership The title to the subject land is in the name of Hansen and Klingelhutz Construction Inc. and said land is "registered Developer The developer of the land will be "Hansen and Klingelhutz Construction Inc.", a firm actively engaged in residential construction in the Chanhassen area for over 15 years. Zoning Said land is zoned "P-1" Residential Development District. Single Family Dwellings are a permitted use along with townhouses. Under previous action of the City, approval was granted for construction of 34 townhouses. Fiscal Res onsibi ity It is the intent of the applicat to process the land and build the houses as shown on the proposed plan under a totally controlled program of the developer. All interim financing will be furnished through the developer's financial capabilities° The developer shall submit all documents such as easements and plats as found necessary by the City of Chanhassen. Improvements It is the intent of the developer to petition the City for installation of utilites and street improvements under the municipal assessment procedure. Timing The proposed construction program will begin within 30 days after final approval and is anticipated to continue for a period of 2 years. 7198 FRONTIER TRAIL CHAhtNMapm MINNESOTA 55817 + (612) 474=4148 2 Proposed Develo ment At the time of requesting this land to be designated or 4 town ouses, the housing market, home financing, energy concern and the general public attitude as conceived by the developer and through approval, by the City, indicated townhouses to be the appropriate type of home tc build. The single family houses adjecent to this land have been constructed and are occupied and it is our understanding that the owners would prefer single family homes to the townhouses. The general attitude as expressed through "Metro Pole" and other surveys indicate that provided the opportunity a single family house is preferred. Thus, the site and home construction has been seriously analized to enable the developer to respond to this desire within the difficult financing market we have today. Thus, the proposal is to preplan the development of the site by selecting the house which will be constructed on each lot and arrange them in such a fashion that privacy will be promoted by selecting a design to use the garage as a buffer, separation of patios and entrances and fitting the house. to the grade. To assist families in qualifying for mortgage approval while not jeopardizing the quality of the house design, each house will be designed and located on the lot with provisions for a double garage and patio. However, the developers propose to offer a program where the garage construction may be deferred, the finishing of the lower floor may be deferred or the sodding of the rear yard, all in an attempt to permit families to qualify as a house owner while still maintaining neighborhood quality. Houses Pro osed Man A Is a 4 bedroom split entry with a double attached garage having TM square feet. Should the option be selected this home could have 1002 square feet of finished space providing 2 bedroom, bath, living room, country kitchen. Plan B Is a 3 bedroom rambler with a double attached garage having 1082 square feet. The garage could be optional. Plan C Is a split level 3 bedroom with a double tuck -under garage a�v ng 2112 square feet including garage. The finishing of the basement could be an option "walkout". Plan D Is a split level3 bedroom with double tuck -under garage having Z square feet including garage. The finishing of the basement could be an option "walkout". Plan E Is a 4 bedroom split entry with a double incorporated garage aving 1924 square feet. Should the option be selected this home could have 988 square feet of finished space providing 2 bedroom, bath, living room and country kitchen. Plan F Is a 4 bedroom two story with an attached double garage having 1400 square feet plus 700 square feet basement. The garage could be an option., Plan G Is a 3 bedroom split level house with a double attached garage having 1602 square feet. The finishing of 546 square feet of basement and garage could be an option. 3 Housing Mix A - 7 E - 2 B - 2 F - 2 C - 3 G - 1 D - 4 21 Total Options The providing of options to be completed ata later date is an opportunity which e believe should be offered. However, past experience indicates that it would be the exception for a buyer to choose the minimum. Most home buyers prefer a finished house. Population The ordinance request that the intensity be commented on as to population and density. The 21 lots as proposed will have a gross area of 11,533 square feet as compared to 7092 should the 34 townhouses be built. Net lot (minus R.O.W.) area is 10,686 square feet. According to the information on page 4 of the Metropolitan Councels report on Residential Zoning Ordinance 1974, 81.2% of the commVnitees in the survey have a minimum lot requirement of less than 11,999 square feet and 32.1% are between 10,000 - 11,999. Thus, it would appear that the lot size is appropriate. Population or what size family will be attracted to the homes proposed. This is extremely difficult to answer.. Rather than attempt to select a figure and then justify it with wide array of studies made by individuals charged with determining family size, birth rates, etc. we surveyed the family size of those occupying in the adjacent homes. It is our -belief that the homes proposed will -=:eal to families with characteristics very much like those who have already :elected Chanhassen as their hometown and Western Hill as their neighborhood. =� Drive Laredo Drive is a collector street, thus being a main traffic --zor on which people are to drive and be exposed to the corporate image residential area. It should,present an attractive visual experience and :'so have a protected traffic capacity. In relating to this access was restricted :o one street and no driveways but the design did produce some 7 lots with gar yards backing onto Laredo. It is our propsal as shown on the submitted 'andscape plan to create a visual buffer by blending birms, fences and :lancing to improve the view and to provide privacy to the homes. EGULAR. PLANNING. COMMISSION' MEETING APRIL 23, 1975 M.e meeifng was called to order by Chalman fear: Herbst. The following mei.rbi'a 5 were #;c^v.:,e:x Gu inHrzrbst, Hudson Sol tenback,, J 'm Menke, Jarry f�E;�.he , Tom, f'oanan,. and M a I �. :'',.;a=rrUpine. Mic€; lela 'itz was absent. Vivian !?eaug3!"c"nd was present. _ by Au.,s4.in tFflllei;buL"rs, ;".C"i i•A}.pi'fi.`v ..yii,,an E.u!•rber Yard public hearing Riinutes of April .l 1975. iize f-0110,wring voted i:a'i,Gm Dan d iit".Sson McAlllerf3at.;.i.s and ti'Fili Mielke. Jerry INeher, , `cim sx,cotiiltel5 ut;fj t'i;.i: N;n,cAlpine cld3StA:x#t#ed. iriit3o31 L:ci5'i t'aii, r't ,. (2 n is -a t?oticin under 1ROL S-,GLEN in he �:pr,17 9, `975, reCjE�:am Plann'i1.�., r•s,i�,7:C� i w tn � +, i tiranutes tm read., Tie f.sevell(3per v,,ol d build he ear ehen edam, upon developing ;cii a rr:nc»'` en*t^ Out-1 ) r 2.s aCress Outl i". A and that this Oultlt: t A vlCyul d. be des+�.HAb s ° �C.i �a �t ,oci- ing ra.�'rw. 1E'F(? a�.3'�:S Y:iit�:; af7t G ihis p37'Ce11 riamlly Lots 1, 2, 5, 6, 7,' u6/J k 2 couid poi3sib Ey be extended '' nto that a,°ea, a5 t• \.n 1 4 7 t d e #.: n9 i,.s�.vle ir�.r tfi:s.',�� ,'3�t' �ff�a::;san �sC:ssr:ilt.rc..�rt aild SGn.Uifd'i'd by ti'dii! PINGi:e 't(!` af3-,ni'GU. "heiepr'j i JP ISM, rMag ili'r Ma.ti!'ing Op n.lsslori �:2fiWtes as aillenided. Ilia folitcolin Votedin i'civor: 'D¢,i:3 "3Y?ct3 ,s�i 1C„�il1Gw;9 lf�iil � �;, eoil-, llop.ian, 111"c35 VlacMpine, and tem-y llehcazl syoyay/yry a t3US-'c LE'S. The City At. yi4t Y�� l� r � � p 4} J'v e developers v1.:� ' ts for H has' al-O b;�led the existing F ovcnsF,nt' .-Inhese Ct.Yi LYIi . i °� o ^, 7 r ?`4 �S ,! r t i:.� were d7 8 =Y i,+:CY � i2 - .1"li\n`. In 962. iV?a�lbii'hr`:6� �3^�i�7ii.: s the'�.it no bui ��.Ilaq erhall !.fie ocitt'.�'d eCUBen, ieE��a �q fer... ti 'd"'ciii "h i'i't>ii w `i i ne (t i' :i e:'d [i i J �.. �+'��? �: i'w�s rE i ei;a ri .ii ; r� � afi�tl'9t si:, r� !3 u'i k f!! Y setback ' P i Of* .•,! feet foriYrost ► �S 'S'i# w� .the � � Oted17i1:il:( re(iiirz-iR%,'till.i am- tlid'r3'e 11be al t 'i f:ha V,eco� ded F`+.,.s t-r' c"O' n) ldxa Z-af 'I Fig Qrdlllisancce 11-ar, to Vac�'.' : 's;a:.ond Pi ace, 1.0 •t' hp. and i:k ey— E'iei'tft?. -to cii::hi'`t"e to thri l�G?�{c\:°1�:'S'?f3S o � ° on � t l �.Cti+..a#�iit..i {zr�t.f is 'dsrS 45!'i '�,i(: 'ir �Ti,Q c?i3j sli:ants have two iil.toi'tiilirives 3'i' l,,h y. ra grog to EFolet to t' 310 `'" 'at Setback E the Tine' wl .d s have to Secure � •, � � r" a, � :- A"' � tv i ra i `'i+. t.!t�.�ap �rlvt q ifs. >�.4, toy S« �S». lf1S .�°.�.k.ii ta;C,Cli#�Yr2 (i��,CE Get. �i''luti it,,., i ,aFaf:"�'.g tvt�r,. {F? 4t!'iJ i�ttb'�i4g4%i�'aG*ll'1 t'isJ ItltrJ 3Fi 1A`.M71!' \ilk„et f,(i4i'a'„titik ll, Y`%,;,m'd the Same w'i 61h06 Gct!"'ver County Regl ti-a1� of D.aetls or Institute; can a foil in county District cou"e.,t t-o seek a #��'claS'"a't.cin 4:3CEgiR�sn4 'LE'lal: '3(*, £,edt33` c>..«.m, Coven, .n,N� tr ,, Intended to r ,?.- ect, Outlotts I and 2. The Clay could tiGw approve a 30 'mot A 1 "11ff; "s'O E C';vO I' t E�'�1; : € C E4f"f2t'I I _ ;;: ��R �a 4n,tUi, ,1 5 • , it� _ _I" _ \ f.Ji.�rf i}�=:.xa,: t~�A. A fllati n was �l:.'�,.'�" ik jim uli 5oG«,"6c.'YY!„�e 'to rcr-cTirmir'.-nd the 9'e13Z,Ti C l amend tie c.G'r,-di�4 t'.3fh7Bal us,,? Pit, `:A'it Mill n .,J/ 3'v bbe,. �iz-Oted net 1E 1 19,7 ,' ' to a � :" ubs f t parr. .t i j iW. � ,i � p... G�.'i:',fln. #,. t.G i,t..tt,�E;9.cS;.,3 �,'`L".Cs 'i �: fa:• .�`c.r;v3"� EtFu %��: , G KLINGc-UlU Z 8f+��:'E'ON PLAN: Jim I-t�ti ks, i ��'3 i!�i DougEialise�� aii t Tom 1.• = ip� .tl ,P L { A ..Ctit-, k ."� �i1 as for. a pin tt r _ , # S'ZX.!Y „1`�1 P D, . . +� + „ V � C/ % 6. � lrY i. ai V' a�o..d hd�.. Y'i {� 1 . � ra .�,'J 1'" f.3 . 4' Y d � , •�.i a :t I's located on the of u_,rc'''do orl" ,P' .uilfa .m4 iCiiii ai":W' s4.''i as i 4v'3 'F Ain' ti ' �`Fi:? r..n.• '5^ .. RS�..>:. TheyJ m;at'7 propose 21 arl., jgl e ai'ti0�", "b4�j i" I' lV:• �+l M. • " :1 ^ S' '!z + 1 r A."•. ^ t s 4 .i•. n ° 't'j d, 6; �' iii @ ,G c:�; �E # i3 eA+i ' Parcel according t o s�1;J:��raphy. itt�: i ct at S 5.ZQ a o iL'tiii'e"c aCL tip. iCFrtGa aiu�V�: i i1 Zrle garage. i on i i „ � �lC:' hdC:U.t'�Sa E''i',ss Sit�4'a' ^:yufib'a, to Larsd3 Uiva Three lots will hi�L...f"�it»g:. Si,i:yare di5its:r.r1 IG^J h::.i,;. i}, ^ rzsei'bdIng o barri;3,, fiarmai, and $4'.ea plaM.-Ings along Om back ofViz-,,soiots. The hmyti4.)z w'ilc 5'ezirg3 from$355;,0G`0 arid up droY3diY3j On how il;i.:;Fi of t.''e&? fees;:!^ '4: a"'':iioii eeEi. �'�'. 73 acrz.; proposed Park lies recently ii•L°�.i•'.\=Y r^M:r'ieyod and be dedicated o, the City. 'Is was °riar c%? the !'ish`j't:tiatiQils and approval of Westem Hills. p 7 �g },� M g•� y ry c,1 tAy PlEmi'"ter tilscv l d h1s I.—O '�,'o. rCa Gf L 4a d 1 s 'I�i'�w� i='""g • iiil e?.cel ent l,-akt..urc c t s pf'4'3CFl,'sal `s that i'i'.. 'ice 11mitc-4 to om, Curb cost. fi'e rsvn,�4? �,xd ;,1(: dtwvi?&6{p:?lam a311Y*41 Privacy Sc.1reen t17ong, the !"t3€emay Oil h", y „4O s tie y,gf"as :K.ti1Cthe Psi13ii9 .r n%11tya* VI ea�n xsfra.2 f:iiDg:'i',:i,k?,21iC?3" s;G i1" e'C4C?ed Regular Manning Commission Meeting Ap i l ' 23 a 1 a75 -2- �_\""I th tho pre'l imi nary develo-Pint Plans cas Outlined 'in Section 14.04 subsect3en �^.ond't kid�ir'vafa %! �11 'GiiO siaggesu": ElnS i'�f3:li �ii� st�i'i �.C}i�5 i"�'atCf3P3s:i�y t�i� City �ilCi�€i�'4i", :a1'ad �i 3:; P,I ai,i,ner. Bill scro"Al stated he feels it Is a good plan. It poses no PrfDbleat", l mill a dra "Ina ge standpoint, a sanitaY7 sewer standpoint„ a read standpoint or provision for SA/ete, 'Me C•ral Man asked the developers to consid-er CGrJC Cte t~t.tria acid o1+StF,r r in this rt oposa'� . Mmm-ning C i?iT;iiss-loft f,i miib ers i' ere polled as to their Feelings oa the ;�Y�li'o' s"wal N-her -• i would ld caicoui age them to proceed. W-11-1: 'cite" ecvnorV as it is 'todgy sf,e have Pt to ,:et back to '!rile basics. HOBO, O, 140 11 C":nUack - 1 like it so far. Dan. �'s�::rbst -• I t i'ii k 'it 'i>s� s3good plan and You em pro -Geed ;ate to Orel iil'i'�narya d� v-e-lop-lit-mt Y P1an. I viou Dd ry3 E%ie, X sce ym, consider t-hose: rolled concrate curbs. We 01,61"ght to .t 3k about stmne ;?�� wn�F�r. C�^sr� ��a�rs�i'�•�ser:� �w �ee�tc�R`;�G UZnd 51'reeF, ear e_t Ftesd,, Lot (). 3chnildt's Acres. Theme is an G'a;taiiritj h0,,,'re On {p�R' S "L" shaped rive xaiS:ms. Sewer is a val table to the pix)pe 14y. Mr. 1;0,14sen would I i ke to split the of into two lots. A Sii,7''i o on 'r. 3a mzde by ;hal ' Mi ac Al pi ne &nd seconded by .T em CsYi3ta6'-an to conduct a p'.!:�'s' '3c fiez,rii,g on +ta rt' Carlsoi3 Aot split on May 14; jP75„`&t E:CO p.m. under tie provisions Of Oi"'ti'Bnance 3. i°otion un�it m,,Dusly approved. sTX f'i,.11N`a -J'ahn Erimon WaS Ut'eSent. to da! eUSS plant for re,51,'i ts', ing use m propaI"'i:Y xion -3. The plaait, wa_.5: p rtlal€y dt,stE"Sfa�yGi�(�iryy^�''€ t,ree�. l�ir.� EiricySy..C�3$, st, tod .Riiejt�jPlali tfi�jv�ever 'i'ihie �S�Qi'i�.Cft� bins S�nd. 7�ail.Yf�ce: a por Fr F�l.lii of -the i,4'o that {s ove' f;. the' gUI''a4�ea l�25: dispatch w l nat be repaacerJ. . All dispatching will be done through the ho,.ire office in Apple Va',�� s 1:ated h F? Sea e , � c , "'a„a }, a .r 'i it�tt`?ti �i�� '�� S,.:w the iTti�i;t��:s Y'F:.S�c�r�,t=t~C.� to i �YaY.; Gib'., t°'rs;c-'+�. a+Ft~'t^a'' initially l t1ced On the plant. 'He asked 'Mr. Ericson ff they wou'jel kJ ii'i n 1 1-10 up wi'-119 soino type 0. Plan via 'ienc- iig and trees to do Scme sc'c'�a ! ing of .h,e viahi 905 as YwelI .as... she northern boundary. Wie C"Ity ought to lmk at Via- st:o- ge o'r X''r. ►:.rslcson stated theny •iom.0 •d be riore Vim willing to' put somi� plantings along ti-i- A EmzA,,, ol-i i°DNS mvad by Pan. i1•.,Jrb.st ond. seconded by l t tson Ho' lerlb-adh to CC": ! 3 Lstat �. bi2?lS3itid �::^iilii. ��? s�� nr3 �i�..��-' "' 4r� '�4" f'�-, .•� r ,..�.• rr �•,w f€n FP at r '1 I s c: to ,-e 3Gr'al sre� i t 3ci:tio . il'i t tilF i"'.ap i want i.las submi6 t+t-ea. lilat iaae 5;:ppl icont be alilm'm'd to p' 'mCeed w't't:ti his FR" •�"' n`•; • and 'remktodel i ng i:+x.S't: that an Lie e I'll"ailed S iito by tht-' <' pp l'i S. an t Uld `a ho City of ,!t p CtR i4has'se, i:i'r by the $ andS:t pa plan hi id pss i v , r ar u^i Yg tbat a ;"°c 657it1 •'�. i? 4!�Cii :i k'i:�i�wi s s ¢ .t.It,3 b i fing f r w t, R ted o A, er-1 •! 10 btv taL`s; 3 i Y. >.i b�Yir � .o, f3'i a:� H.d3tl �:i a�: M Copee�.4.. �. t; (y a':: :ie.r . C'�.: * i `++ v i d be a�� t e:'.: Vti.r i c;.� to k.t'titlt City '6. v �•� 'o R•A i 'r F' fi i::ii� 1 t.icE t2�.iN � : �"{„Y'I r iWcS 41T:li: S.tFL�;.•fi, • Y �a!„a Iln t , a" vg!,.t iJv ck, to " ht-; Jzgg ,.° '" C:;(,ii ;slo i and Counc: 1 �`o Y dit`i�i pia `� i Pii:..,, �• t Cl'! �'�: i"�' yy:' r„ eq :r.'i i. C:i N�id �3''v`Yi • e�'� ti,;«•>..Y� F i iSd4? S::r°:ali iit'1 Of all v1sit Lvr SjK,a:� ✓ F. i rnft , the +.aq and r +? y r. r at€.33 SId s thYen sides, suYtiac'i6Eo Of he itiia� and ►e,i?,a �1 i3G1fi'>�.'i (3rj i)a a ieti;: I iig of �'.� 1 fuN7 •� o i;'i t1z mat; e u Rl°v i e'ri G`r .the oaiiiu or co.ndz'iionaal use pvmiit be accoii'if.}�;'7aiTad ; (; 'i;.t'j t itSl iSioSG co di L3 on s m is .�- mti s lll6 d.. Motion vmai't f i io: sly i pgp.�''lied. ,�O�-UTION A, 4U ZZ Q 1776-1976 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVEoP.O BOX 1479CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317m(612) 474-8885 DATE: April 18, 1975 FROM: City Planner TO: Planning Commission SUBJ: Hansen/Klingelhutz Sketch Plan - Laredo Drive REFERENCE: Ordinance 47, Section 14 Enclosures: 1. Sketch Plan Graphic - Hansen/Klingelhutz 2. Carver County Soil and Water Conservation District Report dated April 15, 1975. 3. City Engineer's Report dated April 16, 1975 4. City Planner's Report dated April 18, 1975 of �,�OLUTION e�C Q r D f7 r 1776-1976 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE@P.O BOX 1470CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317,- (612) 474-8885 DATE: April 18, 1975 FROM: City Planner TO: Planning Commission SUBJ: Request for P-1 Sketch Plan Review, Hansen/Klingelhutz "Laredo Land Subdivision". REF: Ordinance 47, Section 14 Background: 1. Community Location: Southeast corner of Irequois and Laredo Drive. 2. Existing Zoning: P-1 Planned Community Development 3. Area: 5.61 Acres 4. Comprehensive Plan proposal to develop property under consid- eration as low density residential. 5. On February 8, 1972, the Planning Commission approved a sketch plan for Hansen/Klingelhutz for the 5.61 subject property to proceed with final development plans to construct a 36 unit townhouse project per the "Western Hills PRD". Since 1972 no progress toward final development plan development has occurred and the land has remained in an open state. This petition involves platting the property under consideration as a conventional single family subdivision as per the attached sketch plan. Planning Report: 1. The criteria for evaluating planned community development proposals is identified in Section 14 of City Ordinance 47. The purpose of the P-1 use districts, among other things is to: Planners Report - Hansen/Klingelhutz - Page 2 "provide the means for greater creativity and flexibility....." "provide for the establishment of regulations and procedures for planned residential...... developments to meet the need for moderate and low cost housing..... without sacrificing quality construction and ...... tax house." 2. All of the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance are, of course, subjective and require a process of evaluation that is basically qualitative rather then quantitative in character. Certain as- pects of the PRD proposal, such as their impact on the natural landscape, public utility and transportation systems, can be reviewed quantitatively, however these items are the exception rather than the rule. It is precisely because of the subjective nature of the process that planning, planning commission members, councilmen and citizens are involved. A computer could do the job if the process are simply quantitative. Judgement, based on reason, and so understanding of the relationship between the pro- posal and the subjective guidelines set forth in Section 14.01, is the crux of the decision process. 3. Analyzing the effect of structures on the natural landscape and the the Cities infrastructure has been discussed in Mr. Shoell's Report dated April 16, 1975 and Mr. Berg's Soil Analysis dated April 15, 1975. Special note should be taken to the suggested mitigative measures as outlined in the soil conservationist's report. 4. The type of residential structures most suitable for the subject site is easy to determine at this time. Among the factors that must be considered, are contemporary housing, market economics, the needs and desires of those seeking housing opportunities in Chanhassen and the physical impact of structures on the natural environment. The impact of quantitative demographic character- istics of the project's residents on the social and economic welfare of the entire community is also an important item to con- sider. 5. The natural characteristics of the site; (0 - 2% slope, devoid of trees) are natural components for low density single family developments. The only limiting natural characteristic of the site is the "potential" for a high seasonable water table in this area of the city. 6. Density: From the information submitted, by the petitioner, I have calculated density of the project to be 3.7 units/ac. with a net density of 4.4 units/ac. after local streets have been taken out. If the R-1 use standards of 15,000 sq. ft/lot were applied to the net area of the property under consideration ap- proximately 14 or 15 dwelling units could be constructed. r � Planner's Report - Hansen/Klingelhutz - Page 3 7. Demographic Characteristics: The 21 dwelling units will pro- bably attract young couples with small children and empty nesters. The school age load should be somewhat less in the beginning than the "typical" single family house in Western Hills. However, after few years the school age factor is anticipated to increase as the area "matures". 8. An excellent feature of the proposed PRD is restricting access to Laredo Drive (Collector Street) to one curb cut. However, some drawbacks could be experienced. Included is the fact that all lots along the collector street will have double frontage. I suggest that the developer investigate installing some type of privacy screening along said roadway, such as earth mounding, or plant materials or a combination of the two. I would also suggest that the developer prohibit, by covenant, the construction of any fence in the rear yoLa Lkof these lots with double frontage. Planner"s Recommendation: I feel there is a lot of merit in the concept as advocated by Hansen/ Klingelhutz. I suggest that the Planning Commission encourage the petitioner to proceed with development of preliminary development plans as outlined in Section 14.05, subd. 3., conditionial upon the sugges- tions of the soil conservationist, City Engineer and myself. WILLIAM D. SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON JACK T. VOSLER JAMES R. ORR HAROLD E. DAHLIN LARRY L. HANSON RAYMOND J. JACKSON WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY JACK E. GILL FRANK V. LASKA City of Chanhassen c/o Mr. Bruce Pankonin, City Planner P.O. BOX 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Gentlemen: SCHOELL & MAOSON. iNC. ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS 7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 April 16, 1975 Subject: Review and Comments on the Plat of Hansen & Klingelhutz's "Laredo Drive" On the topographic sheet of the above -named proposal, we have shown in red, the existing sanitary sewers, water mains, and storm sewers which were placed on Laredo Drive in 1973. A 36 foot wide, seven ton blacktop pavement with a rolled blacktop curb was also placed in conjunction with the pavement. Here are our comments in regard to the placement of the necessary utilities in this subdivision. STORM SEWER: The street which "T's" into Laredo Drive has been located at approximately the high point of Laredo Drive. Consequently, there will be no drainage water from this street into this subdivision. Because the nearest storm sewer line available to this area is located in Iroquis Trail, all the storm sewer drain- age can be run northward on the surface of the street and picked up with catch basins in the turn -around at the end. It can then be run through a pipe to a manhole -catch basin placed on this line. On the sketch plan it shows the pipe line on Iroquis Trail as being a 21 inch line. This is a 24 inch "Line. SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC. City of Chanhassen April 16, 1975 Page 2 We recommend that a study be made of the drainage at the north turn -around, so that a flash flood will not endan- ger the houses and driveways of the proposed residents. We recommend that the garage floors be a minimum of 1.5 feet above the gutter grade, at this location. We recom- mend using a pipe with perhaps three catch basins in the circle. SANITARY SEWER: There are three possible outlets for the subdivision: The stub manhole placed within the back of a lot in the southerly extreme of the area, on Laredo Drive. at the en- trance road to this subdivision, and at the intersection of Iroquis Trail and Laredo Drive. The first two manholes mentioned are too high in eleva- tion to adequately service this area. The only service line available would be the manhole at the intersection of Laredo Drive and Iroquis Trail. WATER MAIN: This subdivision has an entrance road connected to a road with two cul-de-sacs; one on each side of the entrance road. These cul-de-sacs will each have four houses on them. To.place.a dead end main at each of these groups, would present a problem of flushing periodically, and danger of inadequate water pressure during a fire. There were two six inch connections placed when the eight inch water main was constructed on Laredo Drive to service this area. We recommend that a six.inch loop be provided between both these connections to the proposed street and that a dead end main be placed in the southerly cul-de-sac.. This would leave six homes of the 21 in the addition being connected to a dead end main. This would be partially rectified by placing a fire hydrant at this cul- de-sac and another in the northerly cul-de-sac. STREETS: The street grades of four percent and an implied 0.5 percent are satisfactory. The 26 foot width of the blacktop and the right-of-way width of 50 feet, complies to your ordinance. However, in the cul-de-sacs the driveway entrances are, in general, too close to each other at the street. Perhaps i.f.the radii .were increased from 30 to 40 feet to the edge of the blacktop street, it would place these en- trances a little further apart at the street line. 4 SCHOSLL & MAOSON.INC. City of Chanhassen April 16, 1975 Page 3 Your ordinance does not call for concrete curb and gut- ter. However, recently concrete gutters and drive -over curbs have been installed in subdivisions. This type of construction does deliniate the line between the blacktop and the lawn, but does not specify where the blacktop driveway must be in- stalled. We favor this type of construction and recommend its use: SITE PLANTINGS In the subdividers plat, there are eight homes which have a double frontage, i.e. Laredo Drive in the back and Loredo Lane on the front. Laredo Drive being a through street will produce traffic noises. This can be muffled by plant- ings of evergreen trees and shrubs on the Laredo Lane side, in the back of these homes. FVLaska:be very truly yours, SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. ERNST H. DREIER. Chairman ORWIN PIERSON, Vice -Chairman -MARK B. BUESGENS, Secretary -Treasurer Norwood, Minnesota Chaska, Minnesota Young America, Minnesota ROMAN WELLENS, Member LEO SCHMIDT, Reporter Excelsior, Minnesota Watertown, Minnesota Corver Soil and Water Conservation District WACONIA, MINNESOTA 55387 i.ET US HELP YOU PLAN AND APPLY CONSERVATION PRACTICES NEEDED ON YOUR LAND April 159 1975 AGRICULTURAL LAND Conservation Farm Plans Mr. Bruce Pankoning Planner Chanhassen City Hall Chanhassens Minnesota 55317 URBAN LAND Soil Limitations Dear Air. Pankonin: for Building Sites Consultive Assistance to Local Governments Find attached a soil and water conservation inventory and evaluation of the Laredo Lane property, as requested by GRASSLAND MANAGEMENT you for the Chanhassen Planning Commission on April 9, 1975. Pasture and Hayland Mgt. $ inCere ly Livestock Water Ponds Spring or Well Development WOODLAND MANAGEMENT Ernst H• Dreierp Chairman Tree Planting Carver 3&WCD Windbreaks Woodland Improvements ExD/mh RECREATION LAND Attachment Camping and Hiking Boating and Fishing Hunting WILDLIFE LAND Habitat Management Wetland Management Food and Cover Planting EROSION CONTROL Cons Cropping Syst Contour Strip Crop Terraces Grass Waterway Gully Control Structure WATER CONTROL Dams Ponds Spring Development Tile Drains PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS (PRD) I, PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTS (PCD). Chronology QREOMINARY for, kdscusslon Purposes Only Introduction The City being confronted with increasing urbanization and acknowledging that technology of land development and demand for housing are undergoing substantial and rapid changes, intends: l.- To provide the means for greater creativity and flexibility in environmental design than is provided under the strict application of the zoning and subdivision ordinances without compromising the health, safety, order, convenience and general welfare of the City and its residents: 2. To encourage the more efficient allocation and innovative use of common open space adjoining residential buildings in order that greater opportunities for better housing and recreation may be extended to the residents of the City. 3. To provide for the establishment of regulations and procedures for planned residential district development designed to meet the need for moderate and low cost housing, including the uti- lization of preconstructed and preassembled dwelling units of a permanent nature without sacrificing quality construction and assembly standards and tax base; and 4. To provide administrative procedures which can relate a planned development district to a particular site and which may encourage the disposition of planned development district proposals without undue delay. Step -by -Step Procedure for Processing an'Appl.ication for Planned Residential Development. (Ref. Ordinance 047, Section 14). Step 1. PETITIONER. a. Initial Information. All applications for PRD or PCD shall be filed in the office of the Zoning Administrator and shall be accommodated by adequate evidence that PRD or PCD will be under Single Ownership or Unified Control. /'k' b. Additional information. Sketch Plan The applicant may, prepare a sketch plan of the proposed development for review by the Planning Commission. Such sketch plan will be considered as having been submitted for informal discussion between the applicant and the Planning Commission. Step 2. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. a. Reviews documents submitted in Step 1 above, and request any additional information from petitioner. b. Forwards copies of petition to other staff or governmental agencies (i.e. Metropolitan Council, Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Highway Department, Watershed District, Environmental Quality Council, adjacent governmental units,.Industrial Commission, Central Business District Commission, Park Board, etc.) as deemed appropriate at least fourteen (14) days prior to the Planning Commission Meeting. C. Prepares planning report which includes comments from other staff and forwards copies to each Planning Commission member and petitioner no later than Friday,prior to the Planning Commission Meeting. Step 3. PLANNING..COMMISSION a. Reviews documents and reports as submitted in Step 1 and 2 above. b. Hears petitioners informal presentation of the proposed PRD or PCD. c. Advises the petitioner of the extent to which the sketch plan conforms to the Comprehensive City Plan, zoning Ordinance and other ordinances of the City. Step 4. PETITIONER. a.• Reviews the comments made in Step 3 above. b. Prepares a Preliminary Development Plan containing the following information: (1) Maps and drawings which may be in a general schematic form and showing: a) enough of the area surrounding the proposed development to demonstrate the relationship of the planned development to adjacent uses, b) proposed land uses, area, population densities and land use intensities for each area of land included in the proposed development, c) existing topography, (1) cont. -*d) existing tree cover, buildings, streets and other site improvements, e) proposed access system, indicating both public and private streets, f) common open space and public uses, including schools, parks, recreation areas and undeveloped properties, g).'the architectural style of each different type of building. (2) A written report or statement which shall include a) the nature of the applicant's ownership or control in the land proposed to be developed, b) a description of 'the type of proposed development, including population densities and land use intensities, c) requested modification in the requirements of this ordinance other- wise applicable to the property, d) the expected schedule and sequence of development. C. Deposits with -the city an escrow account as outlines in item 10 on page 2. Said escrow account shall be deposited prior to Planning Commission review as outlined in Step 5 below. d. An abstractor's certificate showing the names and addresses of all property owners within three hundred fiftyc (350) feet of the outer boundaries of the property in question. Step 5. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. a. Reviews documents submitted in Step 4 above, and requests any missing information from petitioner. b. Forwards copies of petition to other staff or governmental agencies as deemed appropriate at least fourteen (14) days prior to the Planning Commission Meeting. c. Prepares Planning Report which includes comments from other staff and forwards copies for each Planning Commission member and petitioner no later than Friday prior to the Planning Commission Meeting. Step 6. PLANNING COMMISSION. a. Reviews documents and reports as submitted in Step 1 - 5 above. b. Hears petitioners initial presentation of the proposed PRD or PCD. c. Sets date for public hearings or requests additional information from petitioner. If additional information is requested, Steps' 4 and 5 shall be repeated. Step 7. PUBLIC HEARING., a. City Administrator. (1) Advertises notice of public hearing as governed by State Statute and City Ordinance. (2) Notifies owners of adjacent property, as supplied by the petitioner, of public hearing at least ten (10) days prior to hearing. b. Planning Commission opens public hearing for the purpose of hearing: (1) Petitioners formal presentation. (2) Arguments from general public. C. Planning Commission either continues public hearing to a future date or closes pudic hearing. d. Planning Commission forwards a report to the City Council stating its findings and recommendations, designating such conditions and guarantees as the commission deems necessary for protection of the public interest. Step 8. CITY COUNCIL. a. Consider, Planning Commission recommendations at the second regular meeting after Planning Commission action. b. Council either grants or denies PRD or PCD Preliminary Development Plan. C. If the Council approves Preliminary Development Plan the Council shall find: (1) The proposed development is not in conflict with the, Comprehensive Plan. (2) The proposed development is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boudaries. (3) The proposed uses will not be detrimental to present and future land uses in the surrounding area. (4) Any exceptions to the zoning and subdivision ordinances are justified by the design of the development. (5) The planned development is of sufficient size, composition and arrangement that its construction and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any other unit. 1 (6) The planned development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which are proposed to serve the development. (7) The planned development will not have an:.adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of neighboring property. d. If the Council denies Preliminary Development Plan, the Council shall state reasons for disapproval. Step 9. OPTION. The City Council may hold whatever public hearing it deems advisable.. and shall make.a decision upon the application to approve.Prelimi.nary.De- velopment Plans if the Council decides to hold a public hearing the Procedure for public hearing notification as outlined in Number 7 above shall be repeated. Step 10. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. a. Forwards copy of the Council action to Planning Commission and Petitioner and retains a copy in Case file'folder. b. 'Requests City Attorney to prepare and execute development contract as per City Council action. Step 11. PETITIONER. (Final Development Plan) a. Prepairs a Final Development Plan.which include the following: (1) Preliminary plat in accordance with the applicable provisions of Ordinance 33, Chanhassen Subdivision Ordinance, including agreements, provisions, covenants and specifications required for approval of the final development plan. (2) Final building drawings and specifications. (3) Final site plans including a landscape schedule. (4) Engineering plans and reports as required by the Council. (5) Any<.other information or documents required by the Council for the approval of the final development plan including a planned unit development contract and any bonds, deposits of money or security. Step 12. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. a. Reviews documents submitted in Steps 7 11 above, and requests any. additional information from petitioner. b. Prepares Planning Report which includes comments from other staff and forwards copies to each Planning Commission member no later than Friday prior to the Planning Commission Meeting Step 13. PLANNING COMMISSION. Recommends approval or disapproval of Pinal Development Plan to City Council. Step 14. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. Forwards Planning Commission recommendation. -to City Council. Step 15. CITY COUNCIL. a. Approves Final Development Plan. b. Disapproves Final Development Plan stating reasons for the disapproval or; c. Approves final Development Plan subject to specified modifications or conditions. Step 16. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. a. Forwards copy of Council action to Planning Commission and petitioner and retains a copy in case file folder. b. Instructs City Attorney to prepare and execute Final Development Plan contract as,,:per City Council action. C. Maintain a "come -up" file where a time limit is stated by the City Council. d. Returns remaining .escrow deposit to petitioner. Step 17. PLANNING COMMISSION. The Planning Commission shall review all PRD or PCD districts at least once each year and submit a report to the City Council on the status of each development. Step 18. CITY COUNCIL. a. If the Council finds that development has not occurred within a reasonable time after approval of the final development plan,.the Council may instruct the Planning Commission to initiate rezoning to the original zoning district by removing the Planned District zoning. b. Amendments: Changes in uses, any rearrangement of lots, blocks, or building tract, any changes relating to common open space areas, and, all other changes in the approved final development plan may be made by the Council only after a public hearing by the Planning Commission and the submission of -its recommendations thereon to the Council. No amendments may be made in the approved final development plan unless they are found to be required by changes in conditions which have occurred subsequent to approval of the final development plan, or by changes in the development policy of the Council. All such changes shall be filed in the office of the Zoning Administrator as amendments to the final development plan. F A B RR L q D pp E F G H I J K L M gg N 0 _ R 0 R S T U V IN K Y 2 ;- ar 5ulw6wA5xTA 10 fe�nu—,�•°'�� " S n.�j i .KE cucr I v( i, fl u�'�ns onw .— i Yv.✓' 4 �, �9 i • 15 pi 51 I151 16 II KI VILLAGE OF 17 e CHANHASSEN STREET INDEX ROAD SYSTEM DESIGNATION '�� ✓ \ i `v' —T, `gx ..,o 7 ` m 21 n.-TE 24 0. / q W = _ ~ CL 124 26 L tl,^ i 27 25 � said ,� -- \'�. � / .•oo I� N 0 I H � 5G1 — 0 E F G H — -- -- I J K L M N 0 R G R S T V V W --; ---y Vo 7 P.''-