73-01 - Post Office SPR pt 1A G R E E M E N T
THIS AGREEMENT, made this 28th day of August, 1974, by
and between the City of Chanhassen, Post Office Box 147,
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, a municipal corporation, party
of the first part, hereinafter known as the Owner, and
Alexander Construction Co., Inc., County Road 42 and Fairgreen
Avenue, Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124, a Minnesota corporation,
party of the second part, hereinafter known as the Contractor,
WITNESSETH: That the Contractor, for and in consideration
of the or
payment payments hereinafter specified and by the
Owner to be made at the time and in the manner as herein set
forth, hereby covenants and agrees to furnish and provide all
material and labor for every need and description and every
article or thing necessary and required in the work of manu-
facturing, shipping, and installation of all of the appurtenances,
machinery, and materials shown on the Plans and specified in the
Minnesota Highway Department Specifications and as administered
by Schoell & Madson, Inc., Engineers and Surveyors, Hopkins,
Minnesota, acting as and in these Contract Documents entitled,
the Engineers, more fully described as follows:
Completely construct B618 Concrete Curb and Gutter in
accordance with Minnesota Highway Department Specifica-
tions.
S. fe P
The Owner agrees to pay the said Contractor in current
funds for the performance of the Contract in accordance xvith
the following:
For Furnishing and Installing B618 Concrete Curb
and Gutter, complete inplace, FOUR AND 25/100 DOLLARS
($4.25) per lineal foot, estimated amount, 290 L.F. $11232.50
The Owner further agrees that payment for the work shall
be on the basis of the contract bid prices. If the Contractor
shall desire the making of progressive partial payment, he
shall submit to the Engineer, before the first application
for payment, an itemized schedule of the quantities and value
of the various parts of the work which shall add to the total
sum of his contract. Payment will be made by the Owner not more
than once each month for Ninety Percent (900) of the cost of
work completed, based on an estimate submitted to the Engineer
by the Contractor and approved as to correctness by the Engineer.
Upon completion and acceptance of the work by the Engineer
and Owner, final payment will be made, including all monies due
and retained amounts.
The making of progressive payments shall not be considered
in any way an acceptance of any of the work or installation by
the Owner, and the making of such payments shall not relieve the
Contractor of any of the requirements of the Contract Documents.
- 2 --
The Contractor covenants and agrees that all said we - k
and labor shall be done and performed in the best and mos.-
-workmanlike manner, and that all such materials and labor
shall be in strict and entire conformity, in every respect,
with the said Minnesota Highway Department Specifications
and Plan, and shall be subject to inspection and approval of
the Engineers, or duly authorized representatives, and in
case any of said materials or labor shall be rejected by the
said Engineers as defective or unsuitable, then the said
materials shall be removed and replaced with other approved
materials and said labor shall be done anew to the satisf Ac-
tion and approval of said Engineers.
The Contractor further covenants and agrees that he Will
complete all work on or before September 3, 1974, in every
respect to the satisfaction and approval of the Engineers.
It is understood and agreed that no claim for extra work
done or materials furnished by the Contractor will be allowed
by the Owner except as provided herein, nor shall the Contractor
do any work or furnish any materials not covered by the Plans,
Specifications and the Contract unless such work is ordered in
writing by the Engineers. In no event shall the Contractor
incur any liability by reason of any oral directions or instruc-
tions that may be given by said Engineers or authorized represen-
tatives, nor will the Owner be liable for any materials furnished
or used, or for any work or labor done, unless said materials,
- 3 -
work or labor are required of said Contractor on written order
as required above. Any such work or materials which may be
done or furnished by the Contractor without such written order
being first given shall be at said Contractor's own risk, cost,
and expense, and he hereby covenants and agrees that without
such written order he shall make no claim for compensation for
work or materials.so done or furnished.
In case any question or dispute arises between the parties
hereto respecting any matter pertaining to this Contract, or
any part hereof, said questions or disputes shall be referred
to the Engineers, and their decision thereon shall be binding
upon the parties hereto, provided said decision is in writing
and signed by them.
The Contractor agrees that in the hiring of common or
skilled labor for the performance of any work under this contract
or any subcontract hereunder, no contractor, material supplier,
or vendor, shall, by reason of race, creed and/or color, dis-
criminate against any person or persons who are citizens of the
United States and who are qualified and available to perform
the work to which such employment relates; that neither he nor
any subcontractor, material supplier, or vendor shall in any
manner discriminate against, or intimidate, or prevent the employ-
ment of any such person or persons, or, on being hired, prevent
- 4 -
or conspire to prevent, any such person or persons from t-he
performance of work under this Contract or any Subcontrac__
hereunder on account of race, creed, or color; that any Zriola-
tion of this paragraph shall be a misdemeanor; and that 1:.11is
Contract may be cancelled or terminated by the municipality
and all money due, or to become due hereunder, may be forfeited
for a second or any subsequent violation of the terms or condi-
tions of this Contract.
The Contract hereof cc^^, ^a-^ c-P 4-7-c ^' - *K; -- �_
. ,.�... .,, uiocav r tiignway
Department Specifications, which are hereby referred to and
made a part hereof as fully and to the same extent as if copied
at length herein, and this Agreement. If there is conflict
between the Specifications and this Instrument, this Instrument
shall govern.
The Department of Labor has adopted standards entitled
"The Occupational and Health Standard Regulations" and subse-
quent amendments noted as Chapter XVII of Title 29, Code of
Federal Regulations Part 1926 (formerly Chapter MIT of Title
29, CFR, Part 1518). The Contractor on the work included
herein agrees to comply with the Occupational Safety and
Health Standards of the United States Department of Labor
pursuant to the Williams -Steiger Occupational Safety Act of
1970
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said City of Chanhassen, and said
Alexander Construction Co., Inc., have hereunto set their
hands and seals the day and year first above written.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA
jcLyd Schnell, Administrator
ALEXANDER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
By i� `'
CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE — WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION & LIABILITY ONLY
This is to certify that the following policies, subject to their terms, conditions and exclusions have been issued by the named
companies: Furnishing and installing B618 Concrete
Project Curb & Gutter.Post Office,File No.8043 Location Chanhassen, Minnesota
Owner City of Chanhassen. Minnesota
Contractor Alexander Construction Co.. Inc
Architect/Engineer Schoe7l b Madson. Inc.
Insured ALEXANDER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. Address Apple Valley, Minnesota
AgentChandIer-Lang Agency, Inc. Address 272 Tyrol W. Building, Minneapolis, Minn.
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION:
Policy No. FW 9693-012 Effective 3-31=74 Expiration 3-31-75
Insurance Company Employers Fire Ins. Co Address Minneapolis, Minnesota
COVERAGE — Workmen's Compensation, Statutory. Employers Liability Limit $ 100,000.00 each accident
Locations covered State of Minnesota and elsewhere as work required
PUBLIC LIABILITY.: 9693-014
Policy No.
Insurance Compank ommerc—i a—FUnion ins. Lo.
Type of Policy: Comprehensive ❑ Other
LIMITS:
Effective 3-31-74 Expiration
Address i nneapo i s , i nnesota
Bodily Injury $ Each Person Property Damage
$ ouu,uuu.Each Occurrence
$ 500,000. Aggregate
Personal Injury $ 5DOEach Occurrence
COVERAGE PROVIDED (Check Applicable square)
3-31-75
$_100,000• Each Occurance
$ 100,000. Aggregate
—OR—
Combined Single Limit $
Each Occurrence
Yes
No
Yes
No
Operations of Contractor
EX
❑
Property Damage Liability includes:
Operations of Sub -Contractor (Contingent)
EX
❑
Damage due to blasting
❑
Personal Injury includes claims
Damage due to collapse
EX
❑
related to employment
❑
EX
Damage to underground facilities
EX
❑
Completed Operations
EX
❑
Broad Form Property Damage:
Contractual Liability (Broad Form)
EX
❑
operations of contractor
❑
Governmental Immunity is waived
❑
❑
contractual
A
❑
Exceptions:
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY:
Policy No, GW 9b9J—U 14
Insurance Company Commercial L
Type of Policy: d Comprehensive
LIMITS:
Effective 3-31-74 Expiration—3-31-75
nion Insurance Co. Address Minneapolis, Minnesota
❑ Other
Bodily Injury $ 250,000. Each Person — OR —
$ 500,000. Each Occurrence Combined Single Limit $ Each Occurrence
Property Damage $ 100,000. Each Occurrence Yes No
COVERAGE PROVIDED: Coverage is provided for operation of all owned, hired and non -owned vehicles. A ❑
UMBRELLA EXCESS LIABILITY:
Policy No. AW 9693-003 Effective 3-31-74 Expiration 3-31-75
Insurance company American Employers ins, Co. Address Minneapolis. Minnesota
LIMITS: Single Limit Bodily Injury
and Property Damage $ 5,000,000• Each Occurrence Yes No
COVERAGE PROVIDED: Applies in excess of the coverages listed above for Employer's Liability, Public Liability,
and Automobile Liability A ❑
AGENT CARRIES ERRORS AND OMISSIONS INSURANCE
X ❑
Are e t le A Li le o Bodil Inj ry of Property Damage on Any of the Above Coverages? If so, list, � ❑
i�6.$ �'e�l��'�i�i'e roper�t� damage .jger occurrence
In the event of cance ation, non -renewal X any m eri change In the above po ' es, fi e d s prior notice will be given to the
parties to whom this certificate is issued. j
Date at Minneapolis, Minnesota on g-6•-74 By
',Authorized Insurance Representative
Construction Industry Cooperative Committee of Minnesota—CICC Form-701, Feb. 196 Rev. June 1969, Rev. Jan. 1971
Printed by H.A. Rogers Co., 2323 Wayzata Blvd., MPIs., 377-4870 i
Y
POWER OF ATTORNEY .. ' ' `
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation duly
organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and having its principal office in the City of Boston, Mass.,
hath made, constituted and appointed, and does by these presents make and constitute and appoint J. D. CAANDUM,, JOHN
B. LANG and M. L. LIVELY all of Minneapolis, Minnesota
and each of them its true and lawful Attorney -in -Fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver for and on its behalf as surety any and all bonds
or undertakings
and the execution of such bonds or undertakings in pursuance of these presents, shall be binding upon said Company as fully and amply, to
all intents and purposes, as if such bonds were signed by the President, sealed with the corporate seal of the Company, and duly attested by
its Secretary, hereby ratifying and confirming all the acts of said Attorney -in -Fact pursuant to the power herein given. This Power of
Attorney is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the following resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of the COM-
MERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the twenty-seventh day of July, 1972:
Resolved, That the President, or any Vice -President, or any Assistant Vice President, may execute for and in behalf of
the company any and all bonds, recognizances, contracts of indemnity, and all other writings obligatory in the nature thereof,
the same to be attested when necessary and the seal of the company affixed thereto by the Secretary, or any Assistant Secre-
tary; and that the President, or any Vice President, or Assistant Vice President, may appoint and authorize an Attorney -in -Fact
to execute on behalf of the company any and all such instruments and to affix the seal of the company thereto; and that the
President, or any Vice -President, or any Assistant Vice -President, may at any time remove any such Attorney -in -Fact and re-
voke all power and authority given to any such Attorney -in -Fact.
Resolved: That Attorneys -in -Fact may be given full power and authority to execute for and in the name and on
behalf of the company any and all bonds, recognizances, contracts of indemnity, and all other writings obligatory in the
nature thereof, and any such instrument executed by any such Attorney -in -Fact shall be as binding upon the company as
if signed by the President and sealed and attested by the Secretary, and, further, Attorneys -in -Fact are hereby authorized
to verify any affidavit required to be attached to bonds, recognizances, contracts of indemnity, and all other writings obligatory
in the nature thereof, and are also authorized and empowered to certify to a copy of any of the by-laws of the company as well
as any resolution of the Directors having to do with the execution of bonds, recognizances, contracts of indemnity, and all
other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and to certify copies of the Power of Attorney or with regard to the powers
of any of the officers of the company or of Attorneys -in -Fact.
This power of attorney is signed and sealed by facsimile under the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Directors of
the COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the twenty-seventh day of July, 1972:
"Resolved: That the signature of the President, or any Vice -President, or any Assistant Vice President, and the signa-
ture of the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary and the Company Seal may be affixed by facsimile to any power of attorney
or to any certificate relating thereto appointing Attorneys -in -Fact for purposes only of executing and attesting any bond, un-
dertaking, recognizance or other written obligation in the nature thereof, and any such signature and seal where so used, being
hereby adopted by the company as the original signature of such officer and the original seal of the company, to be valid
and binding upon'the company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed."
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, has caused these presents to be signed by
its Vice -President and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed, by its _Secretary this first day of January 19 73 •
r��or +prG
s iB71 COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY
'fO�.AN�aI
Attest: al
Secretary
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK SS.
On this first day of January 1973 , before me personally came John G. Thompson, Vice -President, and William D.
Bogar, Secretary of the COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY to me personally known to be the individuals and offi-
cers described in and who executed the preceding instrument, and they acknowledged the execution of the same, and being by me
duly sworn, severally and each for himself deposeth and sayeth, that they are the said officers of the Company aforesaid, and that the seal
affixed to the preceding instrument is the corporate seal of said Company and that the said corporate seal and their signatures as such
officers were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Company.
wiAr• r < -
o
4
• : ,�",,�� : •} Robert L. Marzelli — Notary Public
(My Commission expires June 5, 1975)
CERTIFICATE
I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of the COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts Corporation, do
hereby certify that the foregoing power of attorney is in full force and has not been revoked; and furthermore, that The Resolutions of the
Board of Directors set forth in the power of attorney are ngit force.
Signed and sealed at the City of Boston. Dated this day of August 19 74
Assistant secretary
!YCAnno
WILLIAM D. SCHOELL
CARLISLE MADSON
JACK T. VOSLER
JAMES R. ORR
HAROL❑ E. DA14LIN
LARRY L. HANSON
RAYMOND J. JACKSON
WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY
JACK E. GILL
FRANK V. LASKA
v - SGHOELI.... 8 MAOSON, INC.
J ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS
Y J
(612) 938-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343
August 28, 1974
Alexander Construction Co., Inc.
County Road 42 & Fairgreen Avenue
Apple Valley, MN 55124
Subject: City -of Chanhassen
Post Office Curb.and Gutter
Our File No . ' 8043
Gentlemen:
Enclosed herewith are four (4) copies of the Agreement
on the above -named project. Please sign, seal and return to
this office the three (3) bound copies, together with your
insurance certificates and performance bond, for further
processing.
You may retain the unbound copy for your files until
the executed copy is returned to you.
Very truly yours,
SCHOELL & MAP$ON,QINC.
WJBrezinsky:be
enclosures
cc: Mr. Lloyd Schnelle, Administrator
MAYOR
COUNCILMEN -
COUNCILMEN -
cOUNCILMEN
COUNCILIv:Efd -_— -�-
,,.SST. ZCN'.NG
& B:_DG. iNSP. u-
PUB. vJ'K. D'.R. _---------_
UTILITY SUPT. - ---
G R E E M E N T
THIS AGREEMENT, _made ',this 28th day of August, 1974 ; by
and between the City of Chanhassen, Post Office Box 147,
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, a municipal corporation, party
of the first part, hereinafter known as the Owner, and
Alexander Construction Co., Inc., County Road 42 and Fairgreen
Aivenue, Apple:.,Valley, Minnesota 55124, a Minnesota corporation,
party of the second part, hereinafter known as the Contractor,
WITNESSETH: That the Contractor, for and in consideration
of the payment or payments hereinafter specified and by the
Owner to be made at the time and in the manner as herein set
forth, hereby covenants and agrees to furnish and provide all
material and labor for every need and description and every
article.or thing necessary and required in the work of manu-
facturing, shipping, and installation of all of the appurtenances,
machinery, and materials shown on the Plans and specified in the
Minnesota Highway Department Specifications and as administered
by Schoell & Madson, Inc., Engineers and Surveyors, Hopkins,
Minnesota, acting as, and in these Contract Documents entitled,
the Engineers, more fully described as follows:
Completely construct B618 Concrete Curb and Gutter in
accordance with Minnesota Highway Department Specifica-
tions.
- 1 -
The Owner agrees to pay the said Contractor in current
funds for the performance of the Contract in accordance with
the following:
For Furnishing and Installing B618 Concrete Curb
and Gutter, complete inplace, FOUR AND 25/100 DOLLARS
($4.25) per lineal foot, estimated amount, 290 L.F. $1,232.50
The Owner further agrees that payment for the work shall
be on the basis.of the contract bid prices. If the Contractor
shall desire the making of progressive partial payment, he
shall submit to the Engineer, before the first application
for payment, an itemized schedule of the quantities and value
of the various parts of the work which shall add.to the total
sum of his contract. Payment will be made by the Owner not more
than once each month for Ninety Percent (900) of the cost of
work completed, based on an estimate submitted to the Engineer
by the Contractor and approved as to correctness by the Engineer.
Upon Completion and acceptance of the work by the Engineer
and Owner, final payment will be made, including all monies due
and retained amounts.
The making of progressive payments shall not be considered
in any way an acceptance of any of the work or installation by
the Owner, and the making of such payments shall not relieve the
Contractor of any of the requirements of the Contract Documents.
- 2 -
The Contractor covenants' and agrees that all said work
and labor shall be done and performed in the best and most
workmanlike manner, and that all such materials and labor
shall be in strict and entire conformity, -in every respect,
with the said Minnesota Highway Department Specifications
and Plan, and shall be subject to inspection and approval of
the Engineers, or duly authorized representatives, and in
case any of said materials or labor shall be rejected by the
said Engineers as defective or unsuitable, then the said -
materials shall be removed and replaced with other approved
materials and said labor shall be done anew to the.satisfac-
tion and approval of said Engineers.
The Contractor further covenants and agrees that he will
complete all work on or before September 3, 1974, in every
respect to the satisfaction and approval of the Engineers.
It is understood and agreed that no claim for extra work
done or materials furnished by the Contractor will be allowed
by the Owner except as provided herein, nor shall the Contractor
do any work or furnish any materials not covered by the Plans,
Specifications and the Contract unless such work is.ordered in
writing by the Engineers. In no event shall the Contractor
incur any liability by reason of any oral directions or instruc-
tions that may be given by said Engineers or authorized represen-
taL.ives, nor will the Owner be liable for any materials furnished
or used, or for any work or labor done, unless said materials,
- 3 -
work or labor are required of said Contractor on written order
as required above. Any such work or materials which may be
done or furnished by the Contractor without such written order
being first given shall be at said Contractor's own risk, cost,
and expense, and he hereby covenants and agrees that without
such written order he shall make no claim for compensation for
work or materials so done or furnished.
In case any question or dispute arises between the parties
hereto respecting any matter pertaining to this Contract, or
any part hereof,.said questions or disputes shall be referred
to the Engineers, and their decision thereon shall be binding
upon the parties hereto, provided said decision is in writing
and signed by them.
The Contractor agrees that in the hiring of common or
skilled labor for the performance of any work under this contract
or any subcontract hereunder, no contractor, material supplier,
or vendor, shall, by reason of race, creed and/or color, dis-
criminate against any person or persons who are citizens of the
United States and who are qualified and available to perform
the work to which such employment relates; that neither he nor
any subcontractor, -material supplier, or vendor shall in any
manner discriminate against, or intimidate, or prevent the employ-
ment of any such person or persons, or, on being hired, prevent
- 4 -
I
or conspire to prevent, any such person or persons from the
performance.of work under this Contract or any Subcontract
hereunder on account of race, creed, or color; that any viola-
tion of .this paragraph shall be a misdemeanor; and that this
Contract may be cancelled or terminated by the municipality.
and all money due, or to become due hereunder, may be forfeited
for a second or any subsequent violation of the terms or condi-
tions of this Contract.
The Contract hereof consists of the Plans, Minnesota Highway
Department Specifications, which are hereby referred to and
made a part hereof as fully and to the same extent as if copied
at length herein, and this Agreement. If there is conflict
between the Specifications and this Instrument, this Instrument
.shall govern.
The Department of Labor has adopted standards entitled
"The Occupational and Health Standard Regulations" and subse-
quent amendments noted as Chapter XVII of Title 29, Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 1926 (formerly Chapter XIII of Title
29, CFR, Part 1518). The Contractor on the work included
herein agrees to comply with the Occupational Safety and
Health Standards of the United States Department of Labor
pursuant to the Williams -Steiger Occupational Safety Act of
1970.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said City of.Chanhassen, and said
Alexander Construction Co., Inc., have hereunto set their
hands and seals the day and year first above written.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA
Al Klingelhutz, Mayor
Lloyd Schnell, Administrator
ALEXANDER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
- 6 -
VILLAGE
7610 LAREDO DRIVE • P. O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 • (612) 474.8885
August 26, 1974
QUOTES FOR CURB AND GUTTER
FOR CHAN VIEW INTO THE POST OFFICE
Alexander Construction $4.25/linear foot
Greason, Inc. $4.75/linear foot
Johnson and Peterson
Blacktop street 14 ft. wide x 283 feet long.
9 inch Class 5 crushed rock
$ 1,232.50
$1,377.50
$1,700.00
4 inch Blacktop in 2 lifts $2,816.00
a
lot" , r
. � MAYOR- --
COUNC:LIN i?
COUNCILNC-,q
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE COUNCIL{ __ -_ - ---
Area Real Estate and Building Office C0UNC1L;,;J4
P.O. Box 69069 CLK-A,_, ^.
St. Paul, MN 55169 TREAS.
433:DRF:Ims AugustAJU. l sP
Mr. Gerald W. Sch 1 enk PUB. WK. D.R.
Building Inspector and Asst. UTILITY SUPT. 9�—'—
Zoning Administrator
Village of Chanhassen
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
Dear Mr. Schlenk:
As I told you during our telephone conversation today, we received a
request from our Lessor for an extra for the installation of a 6" water
main and fire hydrant in Chan View north of our postal facility. A copy
of his invoice is enclosed.
In the course of my investigation of the validity of this claim, I learned
that the Chanhassen City Council had voted on January 28, 1974 to extend
this water main. Our Lessor claims that, when he tried to connect the water
service for our building, you denied his request and required him to install
the main described in the Council's motion.
The cost of the main and fire hydrant is $7,554.00. Our Lessor has apparently
passed on the actual cost without any mark-up of his own. We prepared an
independent estimate of the costs. Our estimate totaled $7,334.00 and we
consider the total bill to be fair and reasonable.
We are confident that the City Council
benefiting properties pay their share
indicates that the assessment against
be deferred to some later date.
intended that the City and other
of this water main although the motion
undeveloped property to the west may
Please determine for me the portion of this cost to be borne by the property
occupied by the Post Office.
There is also some question as to how the remainder is to be
paid. I'm not sure whether our contracting and procurement
allow us to finance the entire project and I'm sure that our
intend to finance it. In case we are forced to finance the
entitled to future rebates of some sort, please explain the
owed by what properties.
Sincerely,
AZVI_0�
D. Ray Frisby
Manager Area Office
Design and Construction
Enclosure: As stated
financed and
regulations will
Lessor does not
project and are
terms and amounts
cc: Goemann Construction Co
Mgr, Real Estate, AREBO, St. Paul
Page No. of Pages
mm
4L
A.
The above prices, specifications and
p conditions are satisfactory and are hereby ac:epted.You
fii are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment
will be made as outlined above.
Data
A
JO.hW i• 40�
w;
FIX
Ar!
4 +14AXBU
-BOBS PLUMBING and HEATING!'
,1115 Vicksburg Lane
WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391--1:1-11
Phone 473-7215
PROPOSAL SUBMITtED6
DATE
7:
ADDRESS
PHONE
DATE OF PLANS
JOB NAME AND LOCATION
ARCHITECT
JOB PNONE
We hereby submit specifications and. estimates, subject to a" �6rnts; and conditions as set faft on both sides• as follows.
co
7-J
. ..... _eK
6; 0o
o
.......... . .
(Read Reverse Side)
Ef rrilff0fif hereby to furnish material and labor -complete In accordance with above specifications,
for M Of. dollars ($
C
ll
Z 7-7
Note: This proposal may be withdrawn by us If.:
Authorized
not accepted within' days.'. Signature,
k
i
I
VILLAGE
7610 LAREDO DRIVE • P. O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 • (612) 474-8885
DATE: March 11, 1974
FROM: Lloyd G. Schnelle
TO: Russ Larson, City Attorney
SUBJ: Unpaid special assessments on sanitary sewer
ENCL: (1) ltr from United States Postal Service Area Real Estate
Building Office
1. Russ, in discussing the unpaid special assessments, Kay informs
me that there is also a 19.58 Sanitary Sewer special assessment
that is unpaid for this property. This was assessed out at that
time at $6.00 per lineal front foot for commercial along Laredo
Drive.
2. Accordingly, the City will have to collect this deferred sanitary
sewer assessment on this property.
:erk--Administrator
LGS:k
U' TED STATES POSTAL SER1 ;E
AREA REAL ESTATE AND BUILDINGS OFFICE
P. 0. Box 69069
St l . Paul, MN 55169
March 5, 1974
Village Administrator
Village of Chanhassen
P. 0. Box 174
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Dear Sir:
The Postal Service is purchasing property located in the City
of Chanhassen described as follows:
All that part of the East 433 feet of the Southwest
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 12,
Township 116 North, Range 23 West, lying Southerly
of the North 864.98 feet thereof excepting therefrom
the South 295 feet thereof, Carver County, Minnesota.
It is our understanding that there are currently special assess-
ments levied against the property. Please indicate what would be
the dollar amount necessary to pay off these special assessments
as of March 15, 1974, and also please advise whether there are
any pending special assessments.
Sincerely,
ester E. McAuliffe
Assistant Regional Counsel
LEM:mlp
VILLAGE OF CHANHASSEN
Dated 2 October 1973
REQUEST FOR VARIANCE - ORDINANCE #33
Filed by Name: D. Ray Frisby, Manager, Design and Engineering
Facilities :.rea Of=ice
Address: USPS, P. 0. Box 69069
St, Paul, MLA 55169
RE: The following described real property: Site located on Laredo
Drivp,-a»nroximately mg Block North of County Road 16, U_eX121 ainod bP1ow
Requesting Variance from Section:
Reason:
Signed by:
All that part of the East 433 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver
County, Minnesota, lying Southerly of the North 864.98 feet thereof, excepting
therefrom the South 295 feet thereof, according to the map or plat thereof
on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for
said County and State.
yiaje Counci1 IMAJ. u_`S, October i, 1973 -2-
Mayor Klingelhutz, Councilmen Kurvers, Neils, Bennyhoff, and Wolf.
No negative votes. Motion carried.
At the October 15 Council meeting the Council will enact a resolution
vacating the street also delivery by the Village of a Quit Claim
Deeds of the acreted lands lying north of the platted road.
"ROBERT BUESGENS, CONT'D" in the September 17, 1973, Council minutes
to read: A motion was made by Councilman Bennyhoff and seconded by
Councilman Neils to accept the registered land survey condition
upon a delivery of a deed to Tract A and payment of the Metropolitan
SAC Charge. The following voted in favor thereof: Mayor
Klingelhutz, Councilmen Bennyhoff, Kurvers, and Neils. No negative
votes. Motion carried.
A motion was made by Councilman Kurvers and Seconded by Councilman
Neils to approve the September 17, 1973, Council minutes as amended.
The following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Klingelhutz, Councilmen
Kurvers, Neils, Bennyhoff, and Wolf. No negative votes. Motion
carried.
PLANNING COMMISSION: A motion was made by Councilman Neils. and seconded
by Councilman Kurvers that the Planning Commission minutes of September
26, 1973, be noted and read. The following voted in favor thereof:
Mayor Klingelhutz, Councilmen Kurvers, Neils, Wolf, and Bennyhoff.
No negative votes. Motion carried.
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION: A motion was made by Councilman
Bennyhoff and seconded by Councilman Neils that the Park and Recreation
Commission minutes of September 18, 1973, be noted and read. The
following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Klingelhutz, Councilmen
Kurvers, Neils, Wolf, and Bennyhoff. No negative votes. Motion
carried.
ADMINISTRATOR: The Village Attorney swore in the new Village Clerk -
Administrator, Mr. Lloyd Schnelle.
The Village Attorney gave Council members a resolution whereby appointing
Mr. Schnelle Clerk -Administrator also designating Mr. Schnelle as a
signatory for bank purposes and allowing him access to the Village
Safety Deposit Box. It also provides for the use of facsimile
signatures by the Mayor, Treasurer, and Clerk -Administrator.
A motion was made by Councilman Wolf and seconded by Councilman
Bennyhoff to approve the resolution. The following voted in favor
thereof: Mayor Klingelhutz, Councilmen Neils, Bennyhoff, Wolf, and
Kurvers. No negative votes. Motion carried.
POST OFFICE: Mr. Ray Frisby, Manager of Design Engineering, Bob
Gillette, Manager of Real Estate, and three associates were present.
They propose to dedicate the north 57.36 feet for the extension of
Chan View. Also would like the Village to extend utilities to the
west end of the Post Office building. These improvements to be
assessed against the owner. The Post Office should be completed
by Christmas 1974.
The Village Attorney stated he represents Mr. Brose and did negotiate
the option with the U. S. Postal Service.
September 6,
? �� a • =. ,,E,�, <_ y for the new Post Office building in
as fi e ;fir, t : c t . n. 'l`': e sped fied fire doers all meet
w h t.h,� fire ccck� and the size of the building does not require
a spririkli r <y_ ' em. i I e �- "ore state that the Post C.'`� c
specifications (Now DACW 45 7 dated 6/15/73) meet with f;
rode requirements.
T
71
i
Ic
rl
r)
qar^ ^y'-:
i., s.r:.'+.1�'4J.L r� l��i::..t? ;.y--
�'•iiti.`d
to ord"e-
by
.lo�I. 1. %i YV .�-:lij
1i1�:Ri�.Ji^� s;� �r��(::_i,.f,: -� -, 1~.`..+ i�l.(I: w
v'u'l 1:1.1_0.I.F;:C
��^477i
PL.s_li", S L.\)�':i'•.1.,
Doan lli _x? i't_,
T%-, T),J C,'_-
aL:iX
��t�rba
Nick
of fJ lln
Year: t:, .
IC4l'+ l.i:�Il Glas Iiic.d . b L'?:.I'i� LE : �"Tiara and . C.'..(:t ??.f'(ed ��V it' _f:l
t v ci'?}%l �i"ti`G '�:lit? E' 4i'ti eliL?':r , 1 `i o',� r .L'1.c 1;:i1 LAIC.; t JSTilill5rai a:l
I1i_11Utk? s. ii1.C3� CGI 111:1antI11CJL'::iilr c1�apt"t7t✓C3C1
1..
.'CST 071� ' iL 1E �'d ]L . _� Urd 1: Lily, PL)S rat:,":.�7 C I':i �}�_�' � tJ . �i
:>E;r�I1C�C , a?iCa thr(;- Assoc) 3.c:ttes 47Cr(--� cL;portts -i-r ni t:.1le. ...., �!
i}.c-I. r ::halL and Bu ld,'.Lng ln,,; pec to,l: L?G::i: e
U:i ��ixd.Y`'l.lc. as�'12 Ci-,cjlii .-)ci: of Co,.u..lerco , the
has discussed this and feel t1ae location a i"id I-)U-il.ding are d,:D LC
A la.me1scape plan w;-:, i }' .rese:ilted s}if+w:Ln additional_ 4.::1 ee
near the street and along bo- h sides, Of the builct:ing. rehe �.aa'1k;a.slt
CCLtlllnisslon is concerned with the s:r_ze o-E the trees.
A motion was rli_'•.dC-`.. by 1�.F_c tla �_%Z an. j SC C;`Cii1C1EC . b-y 90cml
3:e'r_o1ninerld -ttie t,a:.nc:i.l Fpj.)roTF. the site ]:C}:T. the ;:i.7:;):w:4,Sez1
building and Oil tr.?:0,
presented Seep.-eITI.i7e:z: 26, 1.9731, be a -lea: L" in diame- e. i-("•i.
i cl}CE' 1 r1'%O consideration C)l }It.'' reports of the t% L1 LcigC 1:1ai.Cji:i,_:
1' re Ria.r shaa_, and Building inspect -or. Notion unzu-o_mous.Jt_jr
� r'•.1 "ic' "A'-'' '' TC?T,JINTI�. USBS : �i .'a_ifl :` ur:r a jr was, present. The II_1.cxnTit .,."
} i.s report of . e-,;:J'i: ei--,ik'er 17 j, !_ 9 I i s
plan. The plan has t'G•:o jong deaC7-'f?nC1' st.:i_eets. TI-L Piana.ei:' .r
J
-cha : f.IiieA-genc't% vehicle aci:,'ass k.e provide6 s;'1' an s4c1;iCZieii'i ML
west. TT•
Iie access silC7li.ld ;le l:}za 2.,: eel or blociCC'C. SO
t-a.ffic cannot use it. 11.Ccess Wl..l_ 4 i]e 1"I.C:od_lld to th(a p:C'o.c-.,
Lift station. There. � hoUld be setibacics :i eGt' .-,, .�x-
to-willhousC-^..s ana si.n le family .!'1ofLi ?s on '-he east and wes; t
lanes .
P t} —.. Burray was asks--,,d, Itourn the L' esterly st + eet aid units
S'p" t}Z.ak. more: units are On the east side of the st_ ec-2.t, W%ay
the si xigle family hoates .
A motion was made by Tim S'iwpone and serondcad by Arnie Ryba
Planning Coivift.is ion rap-?oove th.E, Sketch p 1�a 11 as is Cj^IIE`f c�3.
concept with the s tipla"lat iofl that six units per acr< is ti-ic
that:: wi.3. . be considered, but. that a 1.1s['i:3: derS.;.'try ivay b-'i1J.:i'w..
,at e,z- it :more detailed plans do not justify the current p:rcli.,o:; ,: .
Motion IInan_t.nlfa,us ly approved
T ,,z Fii3I`.-aing Commission would like Don !IserCy, Soil CUriser_va' ?_a --",_::;t,.
to :report on the site.
T, T1vT•7•t ,TC NTN-A D17V ',LIOPMENI ? GUIDE,.: The P l an''n c gave h ! .s i:ep-o.i=t of
Scpt::e )mbe'!: 26, 1973. A Toot- ion was made by Jim !. !iel_ke zl.:ild
Tom
by Tom Gab.bert� 'to : ecoi1'Ilnc-, d that: (�.�"'Aali%1ci.::;se.n 3: ot:.ify b0'(.:11 1'G1c-,i
and i..'r'L<'_ i 1('tr0}:;Cl i %c1T1 Council t-hat, i 1.' C%_i.l.l.c":Ige 01_ C, 0,11i?ct�iSC
W i -tII :E1dGi, P r c'i ir'_i.t : I s R !s0 ' u C_j.o1"A .s17o . 7 6 0 7;7h_,Lc,I-i rLot:(--s GOs1G _ 4 -t,,-;
may czj't:ect the k71.ann.l nq iA(3nients &0,- %-,Ii 3 bC?:t: de-- be .Ween CIDaii.' _-_on
and Eden Prairie. Charshzissexi c^ 3. i. au;)pu.rt a:1dcn P airie J-n ai:y,
clove to ;mend the Nin e-ton".a Plan. that 1'7ill be, jointIv beneficial
to planning the boarder between Chanhassen and Eden Prai.cic:.
: ;C?i 1011 tlllit;l 3.T lr'lll a.l �1' ap,P roV od ,
d
R
HANBASSIN
VILLAGE
7610 LAREDO DRIVE • P. 0. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 • (612) 474-8885
MEMO DATE: SEPTEMBER 25, 1973
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: ADOLPH TESSNESS, BUILDING INSPECTOR
SUBJECT: POST OFFICE BUILDING
Requirements:
1. Survey - yes
2. Construction Plan - Signed by an architect and the
United States Postal Service.
3. Mechanical Plans - Plumbing, heating and electrical
all signed by an architect and the United States
Postal Service.
4. Planting Schedule - Shown on sheet 1-A (site plan).
5. Front yard setback - 104 ft.- 100 ft. is required.
6. Side Yard setback - North 87+ ft.- 75 ft. is required
The plan shows a future street. The balance of the
side -yard then will be 30 ft.
South 40 ft. - 0 ft. is required.
7. Rear Yard Setback - 205 ft. - 0 ft. is required.
8. Zoning - Existing is C-2
9. Parking - Government buildings need 10 spaces plus
one space per 500 sq. ft. - 9 required and 23 are
proposed.
10. Building is not sprinkled.
.y
Page 2
In my opinion it complies with all State Building Code
regulations and with the Village Zoning Ordinance, with the
exception of the property line on the North side of the building.
The North side property line will change if the street is dedicated.
The Village property is zoning R-lA and the Post Office is C -2.
Sincerely yours,
Cwoe� 7;:I�
Adolph Tessness
Building Inspector
AT
DESIGN PLANNING ASSOCIATES, INC.
4826 Chicago Avenue So. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417 Phone: (612) 822-2106
August 30, 1973
PLANNING REPORT
For: Village of Chanhassen, Minnesota
By: Carl R. Dale, AIP
Subject: Planning Review of Proposed Post Office
Planninq Considerations
1. At your request, we have examined the plans for the new post office
to be located adjacent to and south of the Village Hall. A primary
consideration is that of how it relates to the over-all plan for the
central or "Downtown" area. The purpose of the Downtown Plan is to
help assure proper land use relationships, good visual conditions,
a competitive economic environment, and proper vehicular and
pedestrian circulation.
2. The current Downtown Plan calls for the site in question to be
commercial. The post office building is apparently to be a leased
facility but, in any event, the nature of the operation is generally
considered to be of a commercial nature. Further, a good postal
facility is an asset to a competitive Downtown where use diversity
is a competitive factor not always found in typical shopping centers.
3. The existing Village Hall site contains approximately five (5) acres
but has an elongated shape measuring some 204 ft. by 990 ft. This
may or may not be adequate in the future depending upon Community
desires for a single or limited purpose facility or a Multi -use
"civic center" complex. A civic center complex would normally
require about twenty (20) acres. In any event, it is never too
early to begin planning for ultimate space needs for local Village
public functions; it is obvious, however, that the current Village
Hall facility will soon be totally inadequate for the conduct of
public business.
4. It must be noted that a postal facility would be considered a "public"
use that could be considered as part of a civic center complex.
5. The location of the postal facility as proposed should not interfere
with proper business expansion in the area and thus is not in
conflict with over-all Downtown Plan objectives.
6. The extension of Chan View is an acceptable feature of the plan as
currently indicated but subject to full paving and other conditions
as noted in the Village Engineer's report. At this time, there would
seem to be no vital need to provide for vehicular movement between
the existing Village Hall parking lot and the new street although
this might be needed in the future. It is suggested that this
decision be reached later and be based upon detailed plans for future
expansion in the area.
e
PLANNING REPORT -2- August 30, 1973
Village of Chanhassen, MN.
7. Ample open green space has been provided and a good feature of the
plan is the seeding of the vacant area to the west. It is assumed
that additional parking can be provided if business conditions
warrant in the future.
8. While a so-called "architectural theme" has not been officially
adopted for the Downtown Area, it is not likely that the proposed
Postal Facility would conform to any "rustic" or "traditional"
theme that might be considered. The proposed architecture is
rather "contemporary" and in keeping with many new public buildings
of this type such as libraries and fire stations. It is suggested,
however, that a building of this type in this location will not
detract from the use of such a theme (architectural) that might be
utilized to the south and extending along West 78th Street.
9. While it would be our opinion that the new postal facility can be
accommodated as planned, considerable caution should be exercised
as further development takes place in this general area. For
example, it may be well to consider at an early date the need and
potential for expansion of public facilities in this area and just
what public facilities and services are to be accommodated in the
future. It may be that certain public uses should be located
elsewhere; in any event, these matters could be treated in some
detail as part of the Planning Commission's proposal to develop
a more detailed and comprehensive Plan for Public Facilities.
10. Approval of the plans is recommended subject to conditions noted by
the Village Engineer and others. While there are no major problems
or conflicts evident to us at present, these may be pointed out by
others interested in the public welfare; if so, we shall be happy to
again review the plan in the light of any new information that is
presented.
11. As further development occurs in the general area, a large scale map
should be prepared indicating site, use, and circulation relation-
ships to be forewarned of any potential conflicts resulting from un-
coordinated growth. Such a plan map should include the area bounded
on the south by West 78th Street, Loredo Drive on the east, County
Road 17 on the west, and 76th Street extended west on the north.
12. It is further noted that the Postal Service has been extremely
cooperative in the past. For example, major changes were made in
the White Bear Lake Post Office site plan to better accommodate
the City's Downtown Plan. Such cooperation could be expected here
if reasonable and worthwhile changes were to be suggested and proven
valid.
rh o4�
SE01973
3 C\, RECEIVED
c`' VrLLAGZ or
CHANHASSe
>n. MINN. i r-.
WILLIAM D. SCHOELL
CARLISLE MADSON
JACK T. VOSLER
JAMES R. ORR
HAROLD E. DAHLIN
LARRY L. HANSON
RAYMOND J. JACKSON
WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY
JACK E. GILL
FRANK V. LASKA
KENNETH W. MILLER
Mr. Jerry Schlenk, Clerk
P. 0. Box 147
Chanhassen, Minn. 55317
Dear Jerry:
SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC.
ENGINEERS AN❑ SURVEYORS
7601 - 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH - HOPKINS, MINNESDTA 55343
August 27, 1973
Subject: Site Plan Proposed for New Postoffice
We have reviewed the above plan and have several comments, namely:
1. The finished center line grade and alignment of Chan View Street is the
same as that we sent you on April 11, 1973.
2. The finished width of Chan View is not stated, however, it scales 28',
which is in agreement with the Chanhassen standard.
3. We note on Sheet 1-A that it states "Bituminous paving this contract" only
includes paving the south one-half of Chan View. We feel that the street
should be completely surfaced and curb and concrete gutter placed on
the north side also, as far as Sta. 2+90.
4. We note on Sheet 1-M that the sanitary sewer and water lines are to run on
Chan View between the Post Office and the Village Hall. However, no
size has been indicated. Sewer should be 8" and water 6" diameter.
We believe that if the sewer, water and street surfacing is installed
as noted above, the street and site will provide adequate drainage and be satis-
factory. There will be no possibility of vehicular movement from the existing
village hall parking lot to the new street along the portion being paved.
There is about a 4' drop through most of the common length. If such access is
wanted, it should come west of the Post Office development as shown. Guard
rails or 'a berm section should be installed along the south side of the exist-
ing village hall driveway, and some sort of barricade should be placed at the
west end of the street construction to prevent vehicular access to the vacant
property there.
We recommend your approval of the plan, with the above conditions.
Very truly yours,
VILLAGE ENGINEER
WDSchoell:sd
cc: Mr. Pauly, Postmaster
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE
CHICAGO, IL 60699
Facility Area Office
USPS, Post Office Box 69069
St. Paul, MN 55169
433:KAWB:lms 16 August 1973
Mr. Schlenk
Chanhassen Village Office
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Subject: Extension of Chan View and New Postal Facility
Dear Mr. Schlenk:
We are mailing to you one set of plans for this facility as you
requested. The plot plan, sheet 1A, shows the street grading
and paving as we understand it from contacts with your Consulting
Engineers and sheet 1M shows the proposed utility services.
Please inform us by letter on the procedure for accomplishing the
Chan View improvements that are needed to accommodate this building.
Sincerely,
,enneth Backstrom AIA
Architect
Facility Area Office, USPS
St. Paul Area
Attachment
Mailed under sep cover
A UG 7973
VEp
CHaNy� SQF
.. AliNN. �N-
C,
r
i
SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC.
=` ENGINEERS ANO SURVEYORS
r
WILLIAM D. SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON I PHONE 938-7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343
April 11, 1973
Backstrom-Erickson Architects
5229 Lyndale Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55419
Attention: Mr. Backstrom
Subject: Design for Chan-. View Extension West
of Laredo Drive, Village of Chanhassen.
Gentlemen:
Enclosed herewith a profile sheet which shows the proposed
grade running between the Post Office and the Village Hall on
Chan View Extension and on the future M.SAS street running north
of 78th Street. Also enclosed is a layout map which shows the
building and parking lot you plan to construct.
We have used the contour map which you have provided to us
for the grades on the Post Office Property, the remaining pro-
files were run yesterday.
We have drawn several cross -sections which show how this
grade meets the existing blacktop and the hockey rink on the
Village Property. Because of street grade, which descends at
approximately 2 percent, we feel you should step downward with
your finished grading below the existing inplace blacktop drive-
way and parking lot that the Village owns. However, because of
the existing 17 feet, more or less, between the gutter line of
proposed Chan View Drive and the Village blacktop, we feel that
a minimum slope of 3:1 be attained. The maximum vertical drop
which can be tolerated is 5-feet, more or less. With this
grade, the Village can, if it chooses, place a connection to
Chan View Drive on the westerly side of their blacktop mat.
In plan, the front of the Post Office should be constructed
102.2 feet west of the property line off Laredo Drive, instead
of 100 feet, so that the fire hall and your building would be in
a straight line.
SCHOELL & MAOSON.INC.
Backstrom-Erickson Architects
April 11, 1973
Page 2
We concur with your plan to make the front parking lot
entrance of Chan View near the building and the exit on the
southerly side onto Laredo.
Should there be further questions, please advise.
Very truly yours,
SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.
FVLaska:bk
enclosures
cc: Mr. Adolph Tessness,
Administrator
April 22, 2971 1
Post Officer Department
Attn: R. W. Van Sickle
Real Estate officer
Minneapolis Regional office
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55425
SUB: Your letter rued April 22, 1971
Dear Sir.
Where do not appet�ar to be any problems with our guide plan with
respect to zoning restrictions however, there may be som variances
required when your final plan is submitted for Construction.
sincerely,
Adolph ressness
Clerk -Administrator
Ar: fC
CC: Euqene Coul tor, Mayor
T
POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT
MINNEAPOLIS REGIONAL OFFICE
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55425
April 22, 1971
Hon. Eugene Coulter
Mayor, Village of Chanhassen
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
Dear Sir:
The Post Office Depavtment is considering the construction of a new
post office building in Chanhassen. The building will not be owned
by the Govarnment, but will be constructed to Department specificat-
ions and leased to the Government for a term of years.
We have taken options on the following sites:
1. Lot 21, Block 3, Burdick Park Addition.
2. The South 100 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, Burdick Park Addition.
3. Site optioned from Herbert N. Bloomberg as described on attached
Exhibit A to Option.
Please advise if the proposed use of taiy of these sites will conflict
with any local, State or Federal planned projects, eminent domain
proceedings, zoning restrictions or any restrictions of any type.
Your prompt reply to this inquiry will be appreciated.
Sin ly,
°GKn ickle
Beal Estate Officer
Attachment
.f
EXHIBIT A TO OPTION
All of.the northerly 258 feet of the easterly 360 feet of the North-
west one quarter of Section 13, Township 116, Range 23, except the
Easterly 280 feet thereof,
TOGETHER WITH A TEMPORARY NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT for road purposes
over and upon the following tract of lan3 in.said section, to wit:
The westerly 60 feet.of the easterly 280 feet of the
northerly 258 feet of the said north-west quarter,
upon the following terms and conditions, to wit:
1. First party reserves the right t) use said 60 foot strip for
its own purposes and to grant easements for the use thereof
to others.
2. First party.shall-not be liable in damages for the inter-
ruption of the use of said road easement resulting from the
installation of utilities serving the premises and the
adjoining lands of Frontier.
3. The road easements herein granted shall terminate at such
time as.f irst party dedicates said 60 foot strip for public
road purposes, and second party agrees to execute and deliver
a Quit Claim Deed releasing the above granted easement after
termination thereof and upon request of first party.
4. This agreement shall be a covenant running with the -land and
shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the
p-arties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.
AND SUBJECT TO A'ROAD EASEMENT over the northerly 33 feet thereof..
EXHIBIT A TO OPTION
February 1, 1971
Chanhassen Post Office
Chanhassen,
Minnesota 55317
Dear Postmaster:
It is my understanding that you are in the process o:.E
planning a new post office building. There have been a nu,-nber
of developments in the planning stage this last year which
appear to be moving ahead now. Most of these projects are
multiple planned developments. We have the plans on hand
now for final approval for 120 unit,. In the planning stage
we have three developments, one of approximately 500 unite,
one of 1530 units and one where the zoning has already been
approved for 2800 units.
If there is any way that the Village can be of any
assistance in the planning of a new post office, please feel
free to cal l ,atpo�me .
Sincerely,
Adolph Tessness
Clerk -Administrator
AT: f c
POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT
MINNEAPOLIS REGIONAL OFFICE
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55425
Honorable Eugene Coulter
Mayor, Village of Chanhassen
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
Dear Sir:
December 22, 1970
D'-C 19i0
4rCHANAGE Ofi
f-RS5EN
The Post Office Department is considering the construction of a new
post office building in Chanhassen. The building will not be owned
by the Government, but will be constructed to Department specifica-
tions and leased to the Government for a term of years.
We have an Assignable option on the following site:
That part of the Westerly 16 acres of the NWk of the NWT lying
North of the Northwestern line of the Chicago, Milwaukee and
St. Paul Railway Company right-of-way and South of the South
line of St. Hubert Street (Old State Hwy. # 5) in Section 13,
Township 116, Range 23W according to the Government survey there-
of described as Lot 1, Block 2, Burdick Park Addition to Chan-
hassen, being 100' x 200' in size and containing 20,000 s.f. ex-
clusive of front, rear and side yard setbacks.
The option was taken from Mr. E. C. Burdick of Excelsior, Minnesota.
Please advise if the proposed use of this site will conflict in any way
with any local, State or Federal planned projects, eminent domain pro-
ceedings, zoning restrictions or any restrictions of any type.
Your prompt reply to this inquiry will be appreciated.
Sincerely,
1
�".
. W. an �ickle
Real Estate Officer
Lost Office Department
Federal Bldg., Fort Snelling
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55425