The URL can be used to link to this page

72-01 - Nordskov PUD pt 1-;z .-- I war o A ZO% Epp rn nZ -o ( CA < D D Q p 3 • rn m A Z� o �' '� ` < v -n D r- cn p ( rn Zp Q (A c Q m -n o Ol m cn m cn Q Z D Z � rn p D oD rrnn Z o n � o C p b Liu; I S MT. v j m 0 C � 3 N Z o s Q (� o n O (� o_ v m W -0 100 -o m O y m -o -� m CL oMQ• -► c,3Q rn Q' O m -00 o3 3 = o 3 Z co - X . -a 3 3 3 a" — r r Cap m '+� < Q 3' `C - 7 Q �, �, r- c O -„ 0 Q n N m > �. mV Q S m cD c Q_ m < O% m W O m s m to Q mO O -p p vi Ln Yll m 3' O o } m 3 T -3r 3 y -O Q_ 3- Q_ ri m . 3' " (C)N Q C 3• o A 0 Z7 -A* - 01 -+ Q 0 O �_0 sv El mCD _ Q CD� G A A < 3-CD m QQ O• 3 m . _, --�I CA p o -� p -" D A 3 °, =Q(D -.: n 0 c -a' o m 0 .�sa m S U m — O m O Q Q p 0 V Q- � � CQ 3' m m N C)1 m m V � Q W O y Q p c O m CD N Q m C -' 0 3 s O1 32. -+ 3• Co v m N CQ ONE O �m Q CAD G O ~' 0 -v m cQ rn 3 H Q 3 -+ Q 00 o m CA _ CD Q Q cr -r ''� o o 3 o Q_ m .* ZS N _Q v+ p • S O m A < . m Q — m p. oo m � m '} O 0 W N -n C: r O CD z) 0 Q (� CL ^ Z3 m N �� 3 Q CO (D < S -a Q m -+ a (A(D =: m CD CD '* �� 0� Q �G) O r —4 < < m m CD 3 m p CD A C C O S (D cr Q N m m 0 A Q A• C .Wi S : rt ? (D-tea y m 3. ._ m N =;; Q 3 —1 0 s Q 3 _x y O p A 3• (D AOh 3 "6 H• m 3. Q O• 3 3 S(O - -+ -0 O Q ~(D N S O v 3 (� X -0 V1 O< 3• A• 'O n m (p 3r iO C Q Q Q W (D (D 0- A O �^ W 3 p< �• O m� 0 m 3 Q_ 3 m m Q N '* (D O NCL N m 'A CD 0 CD 3 'O Cl O A N m S Q m 0 3 (p :3 p Q Q m _A m O. O ap (/1 Q O m (p CD 0� _+ ` -, m m 3. Q m Ili�. Q rI + C) `G N N O -n '* N m O, Q p O W p 3 -i -3+ a -p 3 N A m 3 3- (D 3' i H 0 (D S m 3 N Q o m o m= ° m -0 �• S Q0+� 3 -+� S Q 3 .�-11 < m m Z m' m O Q �L �O D N 0-- — -r Q S CD A m (D Q H N C X m y• N 0 0- '' O Q 3 a (A w? 3 0 0 Q CD m m C S < _ CD (D S.c CL 0, rt m 3 0 -mr Q 3 0 N 0, Q 0 3- .P m _}.. w m 3 < < Q (D IA !AH '' N -„ Q Q Q A m CD to m O m_CD ° Q 3 3 3 N Q m Q — `^ 3 -+ -r m m 0- 4 � 1PA V O„ CD < C "O 2" � O Q 'C7 2 m 3:--1 C Q• ((aa 1 -00 Q O Q (Q (0 CC) Mm Q p -r O on m 3 0 T CD O- m �• cQ O OS 0. CO T `C m 3 Ln 3 s Q m o v s C i� O Q m cr 3 Z ` -D C Z Q Q 0-D 3 (D m fn a C° a Q- z Y z� H CL CD • H Cr CD CM (D (AO 3 O -O m� sID x 3 3 H n °- 0 o �. to O -r A Q 3- S 'O Q x n Q 3 0 3 V -am s a- m O m. �. �� n OV m Q `< C Ln m O -r 3 CO 3 m i -* a c� < m (AA T (Q m Q LnQ CD �. Q (D_ N -*i m ° C 3 m CAn° m- S m 0 m Q_ X-0 N O m O O m _( 0 Q '. Q h -3i C Q 8- D m-0 o o = Q m Q 3 0 Q S S 'n 3' 3 `< Q 3 V- L -+ C �• O M -r Q T° ° 3 `" CL -* m- 3 Q -0 m O Cti Cr m 3 m m �, 3 3 y. Q_ 3 3. n `" "" cr m N m V m_ A A M C C M 3 O 3 3 p V O 4A -* 3 A O CD Q -r u� Q 3- Q_ -, 3 -a ° m Q li m 3 Q 3 o O �O+� 'O Q m Q -� Q• p 3 p 3 N� -C m 3 0 0 O Q m 3• (Q 7(" Q� �- 'V CAD T S N 3•QO m SCD _ S CL p Q `"• o°� m CO_ A p S Q �•X O' N G Q_ S-O Q Q 3 Q CD Q O. CD ID_ (0 0 7 Q_ O_ O O n m O p -" CO Q Q -+, --.., y -3 O -ter S m m Q �, < Q f1 C Q T • m 3 -* T m CD �Q m m Q� 3' (Q m S° m p m m `" M O ° ? o m 3 m H M m m 3 3 7 CT U, -P W N Q_ m Q 3 C Q cc) CD O -1 W, A AOIX O X X 6 A N A N U1 W N I�, 7pr CQ to /� _ (D O O (A O ' ° p Q 3 Q m 3 c n Q c Q Z _rt y �, + n Oyu (D O n Q n_ C 7 O S (D Q n n Q n T O a (D (D 0• N 3 H (D Q 3 7 O n C, 3. 3. 3 cn (D w Q p A n ((DD• O S pip (n_ (DC p CCD lD (D X Q (D A (� M N n n (D ,' (n D n N Ln Q N -, S CD (D A Q fD n o O C _T fD CD = -r (D O• �• (D n (D - Q_ to 7 H' Q_ oQ `G A Sy Li O y [OD (D Q S OoC0- D( (D8O jS •� -'fn 0- c o (D (D n � y 0 Q "m (D N C CD c Q o. 0 CC'" a o rt n: z � 3 3 0 `° (� 3 n • tan (D n (D O S o fD o m(D s m 0 c o 00 ' CAo • Q m m 3 Q 3- n _0 m (Q' 0 pp° �• Q Q `G Q C lD • S '�3 �' p C 7 �• 7C` _ N Gi S (n -, D-A Q a'N OA S H n C FDD•� a Q_ to O ID 3' n (D i ::; (D o m a 7 0- o` C n- 0, Q t c n N Q (D Q (A c ErQ Q_ -o n F 0 0 Q 3 (D n A_O O^C Q- n C Q- -r � S � — S Q 0 _ O, O Q A 3 �^ C" (D -r ` 0-(D-T- �, 3 n (gyp yr n - n 0 S C). C j• (D 3-lAD �S Q Q C w m m °, 0- -+ CD O O X n S 0 CD y n a < m Q Q m A Q 0 D O S =' T W Q Q m 1 m y m Q— 0 (D ("D c 3 _ Q= --I 3 3 CL m N� a D a- Q �• CD 2r m <• -0 CD O (Q C 3 cQ N -0 (D (D -0 m . r fl Q Q_ O T 3 Cr CD m = (<D O c Q O CD (D• 0� N• CD (D m 3• o N Q A =r S X (D O m o 3 3 (p 3 •� 0 Q U- N Q \� Q Q. -, Q Q A H -, 3Q (D M-0 '^��Q o c o 3� O N_ ° Q 1 O c= -0 3• Q 3•�° Q Q :1 S o �• S 0 Q T -r CD p `Z C 3 3 O (D -r " N X m Q (D 0 fD N• m �. t7 o s ~ n. (D m " ((DD (D N� O Q m m m 1 A p� O O N m m 3 `D sZ �. 3 Q A c Q Q. m 3 m 3 (Q• fD _� N 3• 3:3 CD N Q(D N g Q p 0 Q \T O C 00 lD N Q fD• Q (Q OL s (3D 3 fD 3 (D CD Q Q cr 3 S Q H Q 0 Q �' 0 3. C �' S O 7 O Q Q 3 Q (Q 3 _Q m p (Q O m (D S 3 3 O m Q (Q 3 3 3 (O Q_ y N O 3 �. N T f�D m CQo (ND m -r (D S -mi Q_ (D Q m _Q m Q �• ' m N N o N cQ 3 3 m 0- (Q -*. -� Ln m N 3 m Q Q A - N -r N' a Q Q_ o -a 3 3 fD Q o "' — 3 3 m —� N• " — Q cQ 3 ., 0 Q; m 3 m rt Q 0 p; Q Q 3• <. o Q �- O` N N c Q- S A 3 m (D O m• �• O 0- N m(D N• m 0 3 CD Q Q m N m 3 Q _ -s t< S O• 3 3 N Q ��• !Z m Q S `7- -n Q• 0 -+ O O 1 'G 3 u,' N c - N Q 3 cr m S C-0 '+ 0 0 A N' 3, s 3: o 0 �. Q Q_ Q '" 3 '^ m N 3 s- Q 3 "0 m <. cr O N• 3 _- 3' O_ cr T Q Q m �' o Q m Q Q N 0 m Q m o m 0, T a: R, — — �• 3• o 3 -0 � p A S O p o 0 3 3 a. m 0 n Q� Q 0_ -, 3' Q Q pi Q; o 3 w T Q a- m e 0 � 3j N �. X "0 3 m A (D :; \< m m ~' m M N O 0 0 — CDO_ 3 Q— Q m =: -0 N Q c Q �- m 3' 3 '7C a �- �• 3 Q 3 n o a cQ m -0 o c 0- �_ (D 0 A m l<D _ -s 3 Q. 0 c (D 3 3 A A (C (gyp Q 0 3 \c ° N m Q 3 3 Q m' (Q N N s Q Q Q � o Q N 3 �- (D m -, m 11"� 0 °, -r 2 � c 3 S Q CO o o f Q Q co 3 A< Q _•� cr :r 3 S Q (D (W A 3 C) S T " m m O S m m N (D —(a• m rt O\ Q Q x S (D O CA3 O_ Q 3" (D 3- CA-+, p S A c S A m Q. A, \ O Q• Cr m (p (a O O CA�' (p c (D Q m S— -t m o T v o o < (p 3 S mD m ° Q- Q m 0 m QCA m m >. t 1 Q s Q_ m _S '' m 3� X m m co m Q 3 rt C' 3 D 0 X -o o o O� (Z N. O S (gyp CA — -' Q (D '' A_ �' CD _ (D A_ �• N -, (D S] rtn3 _• 3 f C,3 G N N O O c� �• (('D p A O 3- (D m Q �• c Q < • 'Z �• rt _• N (D (D N o CA Q Z (D � Q m N O O S i _3 3' Q �— C (D _ Q O 7 a' c M CQ S N N -0 Q A c N Z 0 -z * y (D . Q A t O Q O (• 0 O N Q Q y, < (D O 3 fAD 3 N O. O N � S N • N (DO_ A \G co (D (�D 0 - � Q O N• fD S O (DD 3 (D'O p . N 7 O < Q (D _ N Q 0 S (Q A (D (AO•T Q N O 7 3 Q D_(D Q (DD• Q. n 3 (Q N -y -ter 3 S �• (D ((D Q S Q 3 � Q _A 3cr CD 3 CA :' CA 0 La CQ S Q C O :� (Q a- lD C O a Q < _. O 2 Q- S N CO O c (D X CA Q O A < -r Q A �G Q = Q 3• c CAz -�* S A Q 3 O Q O 0 3 Q 3 Q (D Q -0 (D Q `G 00 Q (D (D S 0 �• � V co p q O v A S D r- -r -r 0 �-, Q -0 fD N Q CD (D QO W W uyi S Q O— S < Q CZ N 0 C Q m N O D CD <�, 0 0 0 C N W '* S (AN =. 0 C CD C V S O Q Q CDD OS CA C S (D 3. -}' Q n3 0 N �p in O Q ~p �' A Q S (D � 0 Q n N A Q CD 3 (D �. W CD Q _p -' (D y O 0 C Q T '0 (D C)O (D Q W a- CD 0- . A CD-T C) -0 Q. Q < -1 _— � C)O z Cl Q OC) N 7- (D lD S� N � 'p Q (D C � (D O• T -�+- S (D -r, 3, y Q 0p 7 (D 0 *, A `< Q n O- y O V n 0 m -0r� _ (D z_ O 0-0 fD N• (D 0 Q Q S c 00 0 -h — CIl N --h Q p -ti (D0 : C OQ 0 0 0 Q a s _0 O• Q (<D Q< rt y 3 CA (DN 0 3 (D Q y! 0_ y .r p V -O j• O " Q =-, 0 A Q s Q M A ,MM3 (D 3 T Q N '' CD W N S :r C -r Q C• 0 0 N (D 7 OD CO 3 Q f�D Q- Q '_a A CD canO Q -r 0• C H N 0 y N Q Q �< CO CA -r N 3 -a (D A Q_ N Q 3- O C 0 3 .y 0 `. 0 m tf' CA_ fD lD _X I CD y \C Q N O 0 "* 3 Q Q N C• 0 - Q N p S -r -o y Q t �' Q S (D O Q �n 1 CO CT C N•N S Q CL (D Q N O Q N (D iD CL (D 7 A 3 0-0 �^. x y Q N O Q p �D `< Q A 0 0 co fD (3p Q S 11 q, S 3 (D Q (DD A� Q m CD Q CD0 Q Z Q N (D Q 3 3 Q � A CD m 0 N �l ri p A S Q 3 (D O CD _x N� 3 (O Q a - CD N S 0 C CD A O rt 0 (D Q A Q N CL • A y m -0 ::E n co .., Q D -ti Q o No m ., 0 a M Ln c Q D 3 cn p .. z •� Q '* 7 ` -+, Q Q O Q_ m +) w 'D _ Q O A s• p 3 A 2 3 n _ rt cr m m• O O m Y v, -., fD OY A' to h m S O Q_ (p 0 (3p `G CQ 3 Q 3 �• �y� uVi Q_ CO Q m o o, -, Q Q g -0 cQ Q m -• s (Dl + Q o f D 3 Q Q Q 3 Q Y o o Q Y c�' (D ? O m A � -« y N' • En � cQ �' .� CO m r A (D0 CL �• 3 3 -p Q- _ '* `G N (a y p Y Y CL O 'a m T Qm c Y -Cr S Q_ v, Q (D < 3 I 4-w = -0 cQ 3 .� (Q Q, (a. g Q N. c 0 m (Q n. y Q N H 3 Y Y 3' S S m Q S0 -O-n m A N LA-0 0,, (D O 7 W� m °, v+ Q m a m -" ° CQ m Q Q X Y Q O m c p i, _ Q_ s O 0 :+�, Z.o CD -} lD CC)(Ds S Q_ O (AQ- m 7 -r p Cn a- A 0 Q (a "" -I- s S ;;a 'm Q N(D -a m C CA QY -„ Y A Zy- (D Q Qa Q Q N Q_3- Q CO o m 0 3 m -f m 3 s m m Q-0 3 a'2 -" _. cn _ A m 00 (D -r m vQ 3-� (YD A 0 A Q_ -- m m Q rt (Q f s m N a -+ 3 3 j -O O CD Q a a' 0N, Q cu (D Q m o Q(D 0 c m Y A O m g 3 Q m c° o m m Q_ 3 x .a 0 A < < 0 to 0 3 -, 3 0 n p 0 ((DD �• Q Y s O 0 (a (D p m fD fD 3 3, (<D CL .A Q �. O "3 Q Q m `O s N Q Y(D ca < 0 Q m Q_ - a- Q N.a �J Y00 CA`G Q CA CL S M O a m s Q Q -* 'O 3 '*� (a ii C Q Y Q S A S (a m cA s j A p 0 Q Q Q o m 3 (D •°� Q m CA-� (Q _ S 0 (DO S N• `[ ' _s Q_ Ul v' • 0 m 3- O a 2 �^ m m y m O v, 0 O— v, 3 p.., o @ 0 v' °� Q X v m m �. • co � 2 m A m < 3 _ '* Q S cQ Y c Q' C — O m 3 3 m O Y a' 3 N S � S 3 Q Q 0HaC - ~ AQ Q = CC)D 3- m CJl so(Qm - (.n m a H m Q H -* `< v Q Q_ l< 0 S ca rt O m(D T n o< =m D S H' M�' < O 7 �, • (D -' O 3 fl O m 3 Q p' m (D !� CO C C o CA 7• O O j 0 -11 -� cr a- CD 0 ~• Q 3' T _ . �, O S(D CL t N S A 3 p A 3 -r S C, O- 3' p (D rn • 7 (D O a. 'p rn 00 Q 3 ?'m so Q s m a (p �- (D 40 n- Q_ (D 3 CD O y CDy �• .� Q_ -r Q O T a N• ci cCD CDN �, 3 p "M o fD o 0 -4r CA00 (D A O �, 3(D O CL o Q CD ssM m :3 Q_ (D (D -3� Q = 3• Q p (D p M 0 (Ao(D m Q -r 0 S H O p 0 O O �" �n— 7 0 =� (D X O p' _ N 7 =, 00 p_ pCA 3• N O �, 7 S 0 N M � O+, O O (SOD -0+, T 0 N v+� -Or X O X 0 0 --M O 00 CA rt< O CD p N C CL N S O'1 0• O* (D N �, rt A (D —I m�0 O +, < o < m m z o . . Q p_ �• N o `° ovm g oCL • (ND OQ W 7 m O Cc cQ =,, p . p_ _S A• 2- cz � N v c+ p V 7 S 7' �• Co Q m S fD O W Q (D Q � o p `G � Q (D _ (D (D (/1 Q � A � o 0 o �• � o � cp Co cr o Q O 0 Q O O O S O � C TC Q• o cD D co � Q r 0:3 QQ cr S (D O -r o A fD Cr X Q O m - `t = c- (D 0 % 7C- O p 0Ocr • s O (DCD (D 7 �^� -0 Q O H O A p_ �; 0 (D 0 -r T A 3 O 0 O 0- 3 (D v, S X -" -1 O p A O CA S rt 0 (a• m V Q r Z �' A X- (D Q C c Q-Q Tom• D n p o y ' Q : < Q (a ^D(D p_ y cQ S S N Q H N (D TI -n 0 -0a co Q O c 0 .-4 --I o° t (D �- Q Q- Ci Y (D D Q "' ' 3' 3 A O 3 fD o 0 fD 0 Q C (D Q N A- O A. O_ y O Q 1 < o o D (D cQ Q O lD 3 3 CAD fD N N A A 0 0 0 0 0 Q A � O W 00 V OR OR 00, o D O o O o Ln co N (D (D (D m T O O 'O O `G Q (D 3 0 3' o CD . c 3 3 N -� (D N T O c N N N Q• r, r co o00 � V 1 N N w OZ i 0 3 Q O QJ O OD %O Q 1 1 i O O 0 wwo � � S rt Q (D O 1 `O I A Ln NO O I 1 I O (� NN(V s �QS O -+ j �� O 1 fD N �acoN Q ; rl,—, � 2 Z ...... zr f/�1�/� +"r 4 n 190 o ® " k f n . 0 to ......... . - . ........ . Ak CL f V. Ir ar no- ... . .. ....... Ak 71 CL ra - o —A7— flow- NF- t'-w-r, A 41F H �- h �p -- 3 , A) . � 'i ' -3rvC 8 � � -•- CL � .. •. Ra :.: •mow .=: ._ ..., f a:l _.�' : A , a, r 'mIF �•� a ;� O C b w r--1 ----I --, Aso r-IL m. "� l 3 a � �� S Q� __- 0 I �i ?�� € mm �-1 tZ no 7 7 2 sge'� o• € or c v $ tic r sx i `/ �cic lbbbaobb !�=� 0 It WP-W&d.�� 1-14 ---1 --1 0 ti n V 1 o n a 'z Qm D ° N mm - 3 O 0 n ya `Qm mm i ^o u8 ma o LNOil�i3SK AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 639ME:LODYLANE,NAPERVILLE,ILLINOIS60540/31235Y-null ' /, C0110EPT REVISION Our latest proposed plat plan is identical to the one originally 'submitted when we consider total number of units, and all intended construction. However, the of our first meeting and subsequent discussions withc'or. Tes ness, we have decided to incorporate as many of the suggestions tendered by him and the Planning Commission members as we possibly could. Since our original presentation in May we have done a complete boundary survey and topographic survey, and have done an additional feasibility study. These have caused u, to modify our plans as follows, 1. In our original discussion we said we showed a water trail with the hope that we could do this, but if we could not get the water this would be a "green trail" with a drainage area in its center. Now, be- cause of the controversy relative to the availability of water, we are showing only a "green trail • 2• '-agreed to a 9 hole golf course on our land and/or partly on our land and partly on the park land. We now show 4 holes of a proposed golf course with pro- visions to go either into the nark or into our next area of development. 3,. Our original intention was to build 120 apartment units, but the market at this time is not apart- ments and financing would be unavailable. Thee for =a.re modifying the buildings slightly and making them '�ra.rtment/condominiums. 4. An inter -mix of apartments, condominiums, and town- houses is not compatible with a central recreation area..Therefore we are adding a recreation area in each phase of development and will develop the central area as a country club with a membership fee. This will be avail- able to the General Public with a fee (lifetime) of approximately �*600.0o per family and a modest annual fee for maintenance and upkeep. 'This with a maximum membership of 500 families. 1") CONCEPT -REVISION Page 2 I -N 5* One Planning Commission member suggested that we mi<:,ht build taller buildings and allow more open spaces. This we have done' -'and now utilize oniy 131, O'L the land for buildings. 6. The quadraminiums as originally planned have been replaced with a newer, higher quality plan we refer to as a Zero lot line garden condomirdum. The above mentioned items are not #changes" to our plan Or concept. They are merely a finalization of detall as we proceed and, we believe, have improved our plan. Should� this concept be accepted by the Planning we will be ready for our Public hearing early in Commission October. R H e Lespec 411Y Submitted, Daniel '�j A r1dams Vice President DWA - me a ORMKOVAND DEVELOPMENr CORPORAI ION 06 r- NORDSKOV OF �Q CHANHASSEN NORDSKOV LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 4 639MELODYLANE/ NAPERVILLE, ILLINOIS 60540/ 312-357-0011 ' APPLICATION FOR REZONING VILLAGE OF CHANHASSEN Nordskov Land Development Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, owns an option on approximately 240 acres of land known as the Richard B. Lyman farm and legally described as follows, to -wit: The Southwest Quarter (SW4), the West Half of the Southeast Quarter (W I of SE4), The Northerly 66 feet of Government Lot 3, all in Section 10, and all that part of the Northwest (NW 4) of Section 15, lying North of the center line of State Trunk Highway No. 5, Township 116, Range 23, containing 240 acres more or less. This application is for a change of zoning from R-1A residential to P-2 Planned Unit Development. Nordskov Land Development Corporation was formed to develop a concept of living that will enhance our human environment and preserve the ecological environ- ment of the area. Basically this concept is a low density, high quality, residential area with amenities constituting a wide variety of activities available to the residents and/or the general public. Ecology, environment, and all facets of human comfort are consid- ered. This development will feature green trails for hiking, horseback riding, and bicycling, all available as either private or public recreation. Zoning Application page 2 This planned unit development will include a total of: Residentiali 1600 residential units as followst Referring to our exhibit A we note an area with diagonal blue stripes. This is our first phase of construction shown in greater detail as exhibit B and will include 144 1 and 2 bedroom apartment - condominiums. These buildings are shown in exhibit C and designated a. The detailed plans of the other areas will be submitted as we apply for building permits, but in general will consist of: 1. Apartments in the areas colored orange and designated as b & c in exhibit C. 2. Townhouses in the area colored yellow and designated d in exhibit D. 3. We are reserving the area adjacent to highway 117 for possible use as elderly housing. A market study and community need and acceptance will determine its feasibility as the project develops. Recreations In each area, as it is developed, we will include recreation facilities similar to those indicated for phase I but specifically designed for the intended residents. The magnitude of the recreation area in each phase will be determined by the number of units and the type of residents in that phase. Style of construction is a of Exhibit E. The golf course and adjacent green trails will be developed as a part of the development of the six 4-NORDSKOVAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Zoning Application Page 3 hundredth to one thousandth residential unit, with facilities added as construction progresses. Should the Chanhassen Park District desire this land, we will dedicate the undeveloped acreage with a restric- tion it be used as a golf course only. It is our intention to allow public access to our green trails and to allow snowmobiles on them as long as the privilege extended is not abused. No other motor- ized vehicle will be allowed. The creek that cuts diagonally thru the property, and its adjacent tree line, will be left as is and dedicated to the Chanhassen Park District. The 66 feet of frontage on Lake Ann will also be dedicated. It is our intention to retain Mr. Lyman's home and approximately 5 acres of land adjacent to it for use as a Historical Park. We will help plan.and make available to the local Historical Society this land and Mr. Lyman's home. Our research indicates a great landmark can be preserved here for our children and their children. Mr. Lyman and his family have agreed to cooperate in this venture. As part of the recreation for the area we intend to develop the land colored green & designated "recrea- tion center" as a center of community activity including an indoor ice rink, an indoor hockey rink with seating for several thousand, and a bowling center with indoor tennis. These facilities will be combined in one buildingg the center core of which will have the refreshments, rest room, etc., and with periferal parking utilizing the same parking for all NORDSKOVIAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Zoning Application Page 4 events. An architectural sketch of one area of this building is shown in exhibit D and marked h. Road access to this area will be from frontage road and Highway 117. Commercial: To agree with the Chanhassen and Metro -Development plans for this area, the area colored red will be developed as commercial with that lying west of Highway 117 containing a covered Mall Shopping area and other commercial structures as the necessity develops. Adjacent to Highway 5 in the area marked Office - Professional, we will construct a 17,000 sq. ft. office -condominium similar in design to building f of exhibit D. The area marked Convenience will have several retail shops located in a 40,000 square ft. building similar to building g of exhibit D. The restaurant will be similar to building j of exhibit E. Road access to these facilities will be only from frontage road. Population Densitiesr Expected population densities based on 1600 residential units, and using national average/household ist 250 3 Bedroom units @ 3.8/unit 950 900 2 Bedroom units @ 2-3/unit 2070 450 1 Bedroom units @ 2/ unit 900 Total anticipated population 3920 Population per residential acre 25.96 Land Use Intensities: Total land use area 243 acres = 10,585,080 ft? " - NORDSKOVLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 1° Zoning Application Page 5 a. Residential 151 acres - 62% b. Commercial 77 acres - 32% c. Public Roads 15 acres - 6% d. Unit density per residential acre, 10.56 (excludes public roads) The existing topography and tree cover, buildings, streets. and other features are shown in exhibit F. The topo- graphy drawing is by aerial survey. Our initial stages of development after phase I herein described will consist primarily of development of the Easterly 80 acres phased to coincide with varying market conditions. It is our intention to have completed at least 800 residential units, the office area, and the convenience area within 5 years of availability of sanitary sewers. Our tentatiae schedule for said 5 years will bet I 144 1 & 2 Bedroom apartment/condominiums II 240 1 & 2 Bedroom apartments III 128 Townhouses IV 216 1 & 2 Bedroom apartment/condominiums V 72 1 & 2 Bedroom apartments Convenience center Offices Accessory Usess The commercial area would be the only accessory usage. Should it not be possible to allow this accessory usage under ordinance number 47, we requests P-2 zoning for the Residential area. C-3 zoning for the Commercial area. NOREAJ VLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CHANHASSEN - NORDSKOV PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT LAKE ANN AREA THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, and NORDSKOV LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, hereinafter referred to as Nordskov, this __ day of 1974. WITNESSETH, That in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto recite and agree as follows: SECTION 1. RECITALS. 1.01 Ownershir). Nordskov owns an interest in approximately 240 acres of land known as the Richard B. Lyman farm and described as follows, to -wit: The Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) , the West Half of the Southeast Quarter (W 1/2 of SE 1/4) , the Northerly 60 feet of Government Lot 3, all in Section 10, and all* that part of the Northwest (NW 1/4) of Section 15, lying North of the center line of State Trunk Highway No. 5,- Township 116, Range 23, containing 240 acres 1.02 Legal Aoolication for Re -Zoning. On August 8, 1972, Nordskov made application to Chanhassen for a change of zoning from R-IA residential to P-2 planned unit development on approximately 80 acres at the eastern edge of the above described farm. This 80 acres is described as follows, to -wit: The West Half of the Southeast Quarter (W 1/2 of SE 1/4) the Northerly 66 feet of Government Lot #3 all in Section 10, Township 116, Range 23, containing 80 acres more or less. Hereinafter referred to:as�the subject property. 1.03 Restriction to Sketch Plan Stage. On September 11, 1972, the City Council of Chanhassen, hereinafter referred to as the City Council, enacted Resolution No. 119721 which provides in part: "Land proposed to be developed as a Planned Development District not currently served by sanitary sewer and water will not be considered beyond the Sketch Plan Stage as set forth in the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 11 "...When the necessary utilities needed to serve the proposed development are available or are imminent, the applicant may then proceed to the Preliminary Develop- ment Plan as specified in Section 14.05, paragraph 3, of Ordinance No. 47, Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. " 1.04 Availability of Sanitary Sewer and Water. The subject property is not currently served by sanitary sewer and water. 1.05 Metropolitan Sewer Board. On December 27, 1972, the Metropolitan Sewer Board, by a letter from its chief administrator,. Richard J. Dougherty, informed Chanhassen that the subject property would be served by an interceptor project, known as the Lake Ann Phase II Interceptor Project. The construction of said project was to commence in September of 1974 and was to be completed in December of 1975. 1.06 Lake Ann Interceptor Target Date. Subsequently, Chanhassen was informed by the Metropolitan Council that construction of the Lake Ann Phase II Interceptor Project would be postponed to 1977, notwithstanding the fact that the Sewer Board had planned the project for 1975. 1.07 Application for Re -Zoning?. Nordskov is desirous of proceeding with the re -zoning procedure for the subject property notwithstanding the fact that the necessary utilities are not imminent. SECTION 2. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 2.01 The City Council by a resolution dated March 25, 1974, a copy which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, has agreed to release Nordskov from the restrictions on re -zoning contained in Resolution No. 119721, subject to the terms and conditions of this agreement. 2.02 Resolution No. 119721 notwithstanding, Chanhassen agrees to permit Nordskov, to proceed through and including the Preliminary Development Plan Stage, as specified in Section 14.05, of Ordinance No. 47, also known as the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 2.03 Nordskov agrees that, under the terms of this agreement, that no Final Development Plan, as described in Section 14.05, paragraph 5, Ordinance No. 47, may be either filed with the Zoning Administrator, or submitted to the Planning Commissic and the City Council, until such time as the subject property is served by sanitary sewer and water. The above notwithstanding, Nordskov may file said Final Develop- ment Plan with the Zoning Administrator and may submit said Plan to the Planning Commission and the City Council, upon a finding by the City Council that the construc- tion of the sewer and water facilities necessary to serve the subject property is "imminent: " 2.04 Nordskov agrees and understands that this agreement in no way obligates Chanhassen, its Planning Commission, its Zoning Administrator, or its City Council to approve any Sketch Plan, Proposed Development Plan, Preliminary Development - 2 - Plan, or Final Development Plan. Nordskov further agrees and understands that this agreement does not restrict or limit the power of the City Council to reject any submitted Final Development Plan; that Nordskov proceeds at its own risk and expense in the event that it chooses to proceed beyond the Sketch Plan Stage; and that this agreement notwithstanding, Nordskov must comply with the terms and procedures specified in Chanhassen Ordinance No. 47 for re -zoning. ATTEST: Clerk - Administrator In Presence of: In Presence of: CITY OF CHANHASSEN By__ MAYOR NORDSKOV LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION By Its And Its - 3 - Cas �lo. Date Issued: Village of Chanhassen, Minnesota PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT USE PERMIT Address: (Area known as the Richard B. Lyman Farm consisting of approximately 240 Acres.) Legal Description: • The South-West Quarter (SW4); the West Half of the Southeast Quarter (W 2 of SE1), The Northerly 66 feet of Government Lot 3, all in.Section 10, and all that part of the Northwest (NW,) of Section 15, lying North of the center line of State Trunk Highway No. 5, Township 116, Range 23, containing 240 acres more or less. 1 Applicant: Nordskov Land Development Corporation Address: _639 Melody Lane, Naperville, Illinois Owner (if different from applicant): Address: Zoning District: R-lA - ---- --- - -- - Permitted Uses: 1. All uses permitted in the R-lA zoning district and sub•-ject to the j applicable regulations contained in the Municipal Code and further subject to the conditions of this PUD use permit; and I2. A planned unit development of commercial .uses , multi -family i dwellings, accessory parking, open space, and others as specifi- cally noted on the attached approved development plans, dated _ marked with the file and permit., no.. and.duly.' signed by the Code Enforcement Officer. (Uses permitted in the P-2 Planned Unit Development District as regulated therein and further subject to the following; Special Conditions or Restrictions as Imposed:' All permitted uses shall be subject to the following special conditions or restrictions as imposed by the Village Council: General I. All construction shall be in compliance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the Village of Chanhassen except as modified herein.. 2. Single family homes or other uses permitted in the R-IA zoning district shall not be developed except in the event that said uses are listed as permitted in the use permit or in the event that the use permit is modified or cancelled in whole or in part by action of the Village Council. 3. More detailed and complete site and building plans may be required from time -to -time as development proceeds within the project area in accordance with the approved stage development program. 4. The conditions of this permit are applied to the land.,involved and shall not be affected by any subsequent sale, lease; subdivision,.or other change in ownership status except as noted herein. 5. Any requests for major deviation from the approved plans.shall, require a public hearing and consideration by .the Village Council. The. Planning Commission shall determine what is "major" 6. Where there are particular difficulties or unnecessary hardships resulting from the application of the strict letter of,the con- ditions of this PUD Use Permit, an appeal may be made and a variance may be granted as provided for in the municipal code of the Village of Chanhassen. 7. This Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission and Village Council once each year and may be modified, extended, or cancelled in whole or in part based upon considerations -affecting -the public health, safety, convenience, or general welfare. COMPONENTS a. Land Use Component Description: A Land Use Component shall consist of a'map or maps, setting forth the distribution, location and extent of the acres of land devoted to each category of land use proposed as part of the General Plan of Development. Requirements: 1. Only these uses listed herein as permitted and.or as indicated on the approved plans shall be provided for on the site. 2. Land uses permitted shall be located, constructed, occupied, and maintained in accordance with the provisions of this permit and approved plans made a part of this permit. 3. Major and significant deviations from the approved plans shall require an amended permit prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Uses permitted in the areas designated for commercial- shall be those permitted in the P-2 Zoning district, as noted on the -2- approved site plans. Other uses proposed in the future that would require a use permit in other than the P-2 district shall be permitted only by amendment to this planned unit development use permit. 5. Each phase of construction of dwelling units is hereby granted concept approval only and building permits shall not be issued until detailed site plans are submitted for review by the Planning Commission and approved by the Village Council. Concept approval at this time pertains only to general land use.and-not to site plan details nor types or number of dwelling units. b. Circulation Component Description: A Circulation Component shall consist of .a map or.maps, 'setting forth the location and extent of all transportation facilities proposed as part of the General Plan of Development Requirements 1. Parking lots and drives shall be surfaced and concrete curbing installed as directed by the Village Council. 2. Plans and specifications for any access drives, private or public streets, or utilities to be constructed by -the -developer must be'= approved by the Village Engineer. The developer shall also supply the Engineer with any other data, plans, or as-bui.lts that he may require. 3. Adequate right-of-way as requested by the County, Village Engineer, or other governmental agency shall be dedicated as requested for any and all public right -of- way needs. 4. Title to all right-of-way and easements shown on the development plan must be provided to the Village prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. All utility installation and layouts must.be approved by the Village Engineer prior to construction.-. 6. All parking and drive areas must be of a bituminous or concrete material and the method of installation of said drive and parking areas must be approved by the Village Engineer. 7. Concrete curbs must be provided on the perimeter of all parking and drive areas. 8. Traffic routes for the hauling of materials, earth and building equipment to and from the site, and the time of said hauling must be approved by the Village Engineer prior to the .issuance of a building permit. 9. Development of stage No. 1 of this planned unit development shall not be permitted until such time as the County, the State High- way Department and the Village have arrived at a solution to all potential traffic problems in this area. -3- c- Po ulatio n Com o tent Description; statement of . A populatio in tens then C future 7ro for thesVarido rds of mpo nu nt shall con COMM Pulatio ch us pose lati tarn °f Unity correllatedractepieticsd landnudessity and bui] r�ptive Development_ with the and char inc7udin ding to, dwellin The sup, other ge withi g estimates uses g (housin pportin9 data components oft the planned es of res i d proposed; and g) units shall the General ent<�al s9uare per acre In generation i'ac�lities footage b for the" var but not be Ian the nec ' par/<in inc7udin Y type for TOus resid imite renderedsbary capagitequirements sufficient Bathe various ential size Y pub l i Y o f ref wa tpr cons to to talc non_ as is prOJectedr privateaord utilities umptign, wage traffic Requirements for the comp? eted nizat7pns fo services atrad Beds .and : planned develop tionally °f such I. The nt. numberas dwel 1 reviewcandca] 7y author units by t aPProvaJ 7zed and notedype (number of i 2• At.thi in later sta on plans bedrooms .. perm°sal twith ye.aeprOval is i ages of dev eloto b submitted shall for given r be subs for construct. to Multiple the to the land' 1 pl Ject to s ion of family dev use co anning. Corn ubm1ssion ° multiple ' missio f more Tamil e1°Pment, Bcept 3 ns n5 and approve dbtailed yJanSllings U uildin9 F s shal °nditio a] nit ' Permshal ithe added7todand the future y to the Village Dounci7by the l made Part ofssuance of this. bu ng d• Subdivi Planneulldi permits Descr. Sion Desi n Com one unit special use sta option: A Subd • nt teme land 7 'vision n inc�ua� the princisr °n Design Com basis for -shalllbe .nt signefog0vari ng theepro os Con tai, n escr sufficient 1Ous Proposed lan subdiyisa d iPiiv Plan of Development. the conform detail so that land uses, 'i of e Requirements: conformity of any siteiplc ntoervenas the 1' fo°par t of the General the .deve Jo divi songle Ownersh ippexce ment shall be sold psi 2- The on pt under terms of Otherwise transferred otherwise areas, nor approved sub_erred wise " Ass transferr any portion ociations ed from thereof by an amendment to Other th .approved teo 1 of approved shall be sold. o 3 ntrol Home Owners Effect of is permit, except as may. be Sit Minimum Are Sites. permitted �s conveyed the event anye9eal ements °f Conv total or in pad Lots rt,othetbyu�n the -approved or $ull y buyer thereof shallbebound women-4_ �1 by the provisions of the PUD Plan constituting a Permit and herein shall.be Part thereof; the General Development sites construed provided, however, Pment buildings or t0 create non -conforming that building, site uses by virtue of g lots nothing to and in conformance with °r part of any such building the develop conveyance of a lot, additions or alterations the PUp pment created the ^D may be madeermi t. Subsequent pursuant are adhepedmto° May Ordinance and Provided the strucura] other aPplicablevisions of 4. It is herebyOrdinances constof itutesnoted. that approval ppr0val Y subdivision ahe general plan of divisions °r said approval have been and public deVe7opment which however, shall re met. hearing shall make quire approval All final sub - shall substaake determination if by the Villa Devel conformit the final subdivision lCouncil opment and the subdivision the approved O Plans special use permit.' the of thenejal Plan of p anned unit e . Services and Facilities Description: Component map or ma A Services and Facilities all maps setting forth Component existing and proposed She genera] shall contain a and distribution ystems for location and ri , refuse d' sewage, dome extent of any and ghts-of_taay, easements pOSal, draina $tic water therefor as well facilities ge, local utilities and ownershi as a detailed and aPPurte. ces and f l! method of statement .describing necessary acility• °peration, and maintenance Of each the proposed posed Requirements: such service 1• (Recreation use space or areas, pedestrian and structures Parking and other trails, buildings, for are provided facilities.) Cegtaicommon open private recreational within the n-...land Of such land use planned unit development Village and buildings sha]7as service facilities, pment determined assure the continued enter into an agreementThe owner under ed reasonable st °peration and intnawith the ownershi standard. These maintenance to a appropriate and of one of the folloe e common areas pre as may be a g dependin may be Placed PPr°ved by the Village which is more a• Dedicated to public 9e Council. anticipated. where a communit b. Dedicated to Y-wide use would be C. Landlord Public as a special d• Landownersontrol, assessment district are met: Association, or easement provided all of the .fol}owing,condi ' I• The Landowners bons any sale. Association must be established II. Membershi prior to successive must be mandator III.. The buyer. Y for each owner open space restr' and any given period of Yearsctions must be permanent, not for a a_x" -5- IV. The Association must be responsible for liability insurance local taxes, and the maintenance of residential and other facilities, except as modified by the Village Council. ' V. Landowners must pay their pro rata share of the cost and the assessment levied by the association that can become a lien on the property. VI. The Association must be able to adjust the assessment to meet changed needs. 2. Landscaping, as per the approved plans, shall be completer installed around each principal building following its Completion. The entire area around each pletion. landscaped within 210 days followinglthelcompletiolding nand be Occupancy Of that building. cupancy f 3• Landscaping shall be properly maintained and replaced if or lost by winterkill, drought, or other causes. This condition shall apply to existing trees and other landscaping proposed to be retained. 4. Easements for utilities or other purposes shall be.provided a requested by the Village. s 5. Provisions for sanitary sewer, and other utilities shall be madebasCreater, surface by e Villa drainage, 5. Easements or other provisions for pedestrian or other trails Engineer. Part of the comprehensive trail system shall be provided ilsdioebe, and approved by the Planning Commission.as 1 .__ Construction Order Com.ronent Description: The Construction Order Component shall contain a ma maps setting forth the proposed chronological order of constructio or relating each proposed use and structure and to the construction n various services and facilities as may be required herein. Said Component shall include estimated completion dates and shallif. the the proposed order of request for utility release or other authority specify to occupy completed structures so as tosis Y the adequacy of the related services andpfacilitieSafor eachfor aseearating construction phase. p e Requirements: 1. All public and private development shall proceed ' an approved stage development program and no building or other in accordance with construction permits shall be issued except in accordance nce with sand 2. Staging shall be as approved by the Village Engineer and Code Enforcement Officer. 3. That part of the plan indicated as being Phase No. 1 shall not be granted building permits until such time that final and detailed plans and specifications have been approved by the Village Council. M Construction on Phase sanitary sewer, road have been approved by assure proper staging development. ___Additional Components N0• 1 shall not commence untii access, and other area wide plans for the Village Council in considerations and coordination of an sufficient detail to Public and private Description: The General Plan of Components : need a indicated b Development ma proposed development. Y the nature Y include such other pment. of the particular Requirements: ,l. Trash, garbage, posedWastes, and other refuse Ofin the manner as indicated on shall, the a stored and dis- 2• Exterior storagepproved plans. other miscellaeous storage Junk cars parkin 9 other boats, camper units parkings all be permitted only than normal and this pecificalj approved vehicular permit. Y �f s Y authorized by 3• No by signs shall b , rental, advertising, the Code Enforcement except those specific directional, or other part of this permit. and shown nth_alroved horized by approved plans as ¢• Dwelling units, commercial buildings, be occupied until a Certificate of Occu the Village• g ' °r other structures shall not pancy has -been issued by 5• Interior and exterior fire features shall be installed prevention Department and Code Enforcement maintained and other requirements d Co be and maintained as directed by the alter. made directly Officer. Any appeal to Y the Fire the requirements and said Y to the Villa said this permit alterations shall Village made who may 5• Accessorypart of. uses such as part shall be permitted only Y rooms, day nurseries, and the like this permit. y authorized and listed as a 7• Bonding to Assure Agreements. Conformance to General Plan of the General Plan assure that any improvements sof ifielo to a utility of Development p Development, Y release for necessary as�af re as part e each phase as ) are completed under pre -requisite the Villa outlined in the Plan or the terms of 9e Council according in any agreements said plan i applicant shall post a. g to the provisions executed with guarantee for the faia-co porate suret °f this..Permit, the and the performanceyoond, cash bond or other total payment of any costs to the Village work or a as recommended by.the Code Enforcement Officer and V-illage agreements Engineer and approved b g in a sum equal_to the Y the Village Council. Furthermore, prior 7 to certification of the Site Plans required by this P Code Enforcement Officer and Village Engineer shall a1 the amount of corporate surety bond or cash ermit, the separate facility, co so determine each each phase ci dey, landscaping, or h bond steal} cover each landscaping, or utility required as and in the Genera] Plan of Development, as the part of however, Outlined in the approved Use Permit that part of the corporate surety bond bond may. released when an ay � providec recommendation .of thecEngineerpartand theof approvalis completed, upon be Council. pp al by the Vil i age �8. Prior to occupancy of any dwelli shall paid to the Village fornrecreationfarea needs development. ee Of $50.00 per unit p Said fees, however, may be refunded created by the part.provided it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of Council that all normal neighborhood t in total or in for the population served have been provided on the accepted standards for the type recreation facilities Will be utilized to determine the extent to the site.. Generally provision of recreation sites and faciTiti requirements have been met. which recreation areas and facilities shall beIn any event, allproposed as -indicated on tappo recreation 9. All development and uses shall be subject to annual approved plans. the Village for purposes of assuring continued al inspection by provisions of the permit. conformity to the 10. All structures at all times• and grounds steal] be properly and well maintained 11. Land uses permitted shall be located, co maintained in accordance with the provisionsucted, occupied approved plans made of this and part of this permit. permit and 12. All maps, reports and other documents attached to are properly approved and fired shall be considered his a this permit and shall have the same force and effect permit which set down herein and. are hereby made a part of Part -of this as . fully 13. Security lightingpermit. directed b shall be installed, maintained, and operated as y the Code Enforcement Officer.' 14, Special precautions as directed b y thell Enforcement Officer shall be taken bothVdurine Engineer and Code to assure against the following: 1• Silting from gradingg and after construction . 2. Erosion(wind or anY other source or cause. 3• Po]lutionofr any ater). type. 15. All conditions recommended b and approved by the Village ouncil are a o y the Village Engineer attached heret this permit. Cpart of and conditions to r DEB i� VILLAGE QF. r`V, P. 'GHAN1-iASSE,P<`l, ,� A � 16. A11 right-Of-way,f provided easements,, or other the pfuture rovided expense; public requirements Closing of an this condition shall slsotoe that any driveway-ory access drives that may apply also to to accomodate sadcloshngs shall be accomplished Y be required in er alterations required on Of the land owner affected, omplished private >ense rt under conditions of Any access noted as bei the expense requested b the Pan use permit shall be ng temporary Y the Village and at no public cost, abandoned when 17. Conditions of this l amended or added Planned unit development use to as planning and develo ment permit may be p proceeds. 114. MIM S 18. NOTE: The following comments are in the form Report and may or may not be utilized to form conditions to be added here or in other parts a) b) c) of a Planning the basis for PUD Of the Permit. It must be noted that the entire proposal amounts to a large diversified "center" with over 1,000,000 sq. ft. of commercial floor space placing it in the same recently developed Northtown, Sears-Homart,categoSouthdale,tandhe other large retail centers. All of these have proven to create traffic volumes and problems of the highest magnitude.. In most cases, large sums of public money have and are being required to solve access, utility, drainage., and -other associated problems which have emerged due to inadequate planning prior to construction. The opinion of a Traffic Engineer is strongly recommended to be in the public interest for proper evaluation of this proposed PUD. The actual, net dwelling unit density proposed is still rather difficult to evaluate due to the manner in which data is presented. Proposed density for the first stage of development seems reasonable although the projected density for the entire project still seems rather high. It is reconded that the matter of future permitted density be leftmme"Open" at this time due to the uncertain nature:of future market conditions, changes in land development trends, and other changes beyond the control of either the developer or the Village. It is suggested that densities above that'of typical single-family home development be assumed as permit that the maximum desirable to permit is still openttodqubestion. As an example, the developer suggests that housing for the elderly may be a future consideration; if this be the case, much higher density might be appropriate; if not, very high density for "family" living would not be appropriate It is suggested that any and all offered "public" areas and facilities be dedicated to the public by the developer only if permitted and accepted after careful study by the Park and Recreation Commission and others. Public ownership should be accepted one under conditions whereby the total "Community" interest would be best served; it is -suggested proposed golf course and other facilitieseproposedhere could best serve the general public interest by remaining in private hands but with certain rights (such as trail use)bein to the public by easement and other means. It is, however, recommended that the strip of land providing access to Lake Ann is strongly in the public interest and that it should be dedicated as part of the first phase of development. d) Part of the confusion that may exist has to do with terminology; for example, "public recreation" also includes such things as a bowling alley, indoor tennis, and an ice arena (to seat several thousand). Generally, this is considered as "commercial recreation" on a profit oriented basis and would not be considered "public recreation" under commonly utilized terminolo such uses would simply be considered as "commercial" with theher, usual profit motivation. It must also be noted, substantial "commercial recreation" facilities almost always produced severe traffic problems; in this case, these would be in addition to those created by a major regional shopping center. e) Proposed "recreational" facilities may or may not be adequate. The proposal apparently equates quantity with quantity; that is, the larger the number of people, the larger the recreation area. This is not proper planning; the recreation element should be related to the population component. Population characteristics are more important; for example, family type dwelling units will require ball fields and other larger areas; retirement housing will require much smaller and different types of "recreation areas" f) Plans for the first stage of development are adequate only for "concept" approval. Prior to final approval (by the Planning Commission) the following would be needed: 1) A fully dimensioned site plan. 2) Specific landscape plan (detailed plans and specifications). 3) Detailed plan for grading, utilities, and other engineering considerations. 4) Plan for adjacent improvements such as roads and utilities that must be extended to the specific site of phase one construction. g) Summar 1 As a general "concept" the PUD proposal seems adequate. 2) In terms of specifics, the proposal still seems rather vague and limited in comparison with the magnitude of the total project proposal. 3) The proposal is for one of the largest, most intense, compli- cated, and most densely populated projects in the Twin Cities Metropolitan area; information submitted to date would seem to indicate otherwise; planning must be in scale with the nature and scale of proposed development. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED REZONING, PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND PRELIMINARY PLAT NORDSKOV. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That the City Planning Commission of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, will meet on Wednesday, the 14th day of August, 1974, at 7:30 p.m. , at the City Hall in said City, for the purpose of holding a public hearing on proposed rezoning in the City as follows: 1. To rezone the following described property from R-lA Agricultural District to P-2 Planned Residential Develop- ment District as defined in Chanhassen Ordinance No. 47: The West Half of the Southeast Quarter (W 1/2 of SE 1/4) and the Northerly 66 feet of Government Lot 3, Section 10, Township 116, Range 23, containing 80 acres, more or less, Carver County, Minnesota. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN That the Planning Commission will meet at the same time and place for the purpose of holding a public hearing on a preliminary development plan and a preliminary plat known as "Nordskov", and involving the southwest corner of the above described tract of land. Said public hearings shall be consolidated as one hearing. A plan showing said proposed preliminary development plan, preliminary plat and proposed rezoning is available for inspection at the City Hall. F All persons interested may appear and be heard at said time and place. BY ORDER OF THE CITY PLANNINC COMMISSIO Zoning Administrator Dated: July 19, 1974. Publish July 25, 1974, in the Chaska Herald. SCHOELL & MADSON, lNr,. ENGINEERS AN❑ SURVEYORS i WILLIAM D. SCHDELL CARLI5 LE MADSON PHONE 938-7601 S❑ NINTH AVENUE SOUTH ' HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 5535 May 8, 1972 Mr. Adolph Tessness, Administrator P. 0. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Subject: Review off -l'INordskov" Concept Plan Dear Mr. Tessness: In response to your request, we have made a preliminary study of the devel- opment contemplated in the Concept Plan for "Nordskov".9 located in the northeast quadrant of County Road 117 and State Highway 5. GENERAL Exhibit "B" shows the 160 acre total tract with its proposed land use: commercial, office, multiple housing, sports facilities and open land for recreational purposes. The northeast corner of the tract in- cludes an access to a small portion of the west shore of Lake Ann. The initial development of the eastern 80-acre portion is shown on Exhibits "A" and "C". LAND USE PROPOSED Commercial Recreational 6 Acres 7.5% Open Lale and Stream Area 14 11 17.5 Open Land, Park 14 Residential 10 12 Apartments 39 49 1 BR 176 2 BR 448 2 BR & Den 48 Town Houses 52 Quadriniums 76 Total 800 Residential unit density is 20.5 units per acre in the resi- dentially -used area alone and 10.8 units per acre when the recreational and open water areas and land are considered. Building coverage is 13%; floor area ratio is 22%. UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE The area can be served by sanitary sewer after the Lake Ann Interceptor, Section II, is constructed. This line will cross the northeast corner of the tract. SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC. Mr, Adolph Tessness Page 2 May 8, 1972 Water will be available from the proposed well to be built in connection with the North Chanhassen project, but a second well will be required to meet expected water needs and probably also the ground storage tank recommended to be built on T. H. 41 near the Ross property. Interconnection eastward to the existing main along T. H. 5 .is desirable, providing there is sufficient other demand for water along this route. Drainage can be accomplished be disposing of pond overflow to Lake Ann, and through the property to the east, into Riley Creek, which drains Lake Ann southward. ROADS Exhibit "B" includes a divided lane collector street which should pro- vide efficient -circulation to'the area. Because the location and geometrics of the future intersection of new T. H. 41 and 5 are not known, access to 117 and 5 at the points indicated should result in minimum conflict with the new major intersection. Very truly yours, VILLAGE ENGINEER WDSchoell:sd mm AB & B Associates Inc. 639 Melody Lane Naperville, Illinois 60540 (312) 357-4373 29, 1972 l)Lt. Av,4,A Temne" V L�e o� Chw.den Chw?&e,-4 M&Umdo#a R�. Nond�v Land Deve,&/;megr t COAnatiOn Dean & Temnedj; PP cat�On I an enc, 04ing a U O� ;&e punk and .Lette2a 16e.Cieve ane neceacaV �on O' u2 Zon&ng r4pP, wjjOn. Thank you v&zu much fn �ou2 one and he-/P 4n ; 6u a M Vec t. Ad I read Ae 04dinanee, a.0 wee ane mw4jng cute the mvenantd and #fie mvdej )Gin u4 j, 9-e-i f naC appwva-1. The Wde,C m aae ur1A� On and uii GC have .caE done 6� Septemb eh /, the m ven.�ta I m `fie V ' canwti � ujL� ut �`fieee rru#1z �e A&-O Zne�. Per Ah he auc 4-4azed Ode• & a check the fOZ 4',,j 'of mvenaniA AT conPj ;to ,demon /4•05i . eu64eetion ., pa,a �6.1of the Chcr�ei Zoning Ondi Hance. Speci,i cxzLG�, °� -&&:fnepu®d fog ';t 6e mmP,Leied .inu more Pnmal manner? !. Dedi Qztc on O� a-U an-teni aC wadd ad the deve lop wjt 2• §Wntin f O� an eadememt Pt the ' n O� a oaten main A� wdy Road 117 � ;to oua main Ao zou�h_ • coad#iu CjiOa #O 6e dyne 6.1 aEhe Vi t&q,, O ChaaAa. den. 3• Dedi.ca#.ion o� the 66At O� Labe Ann. e ;to A, Chanhadden Panh OZ&f Zcj. 4. Dedi-catr'on o� 4;&cm and ad ,$acen;t 9neen z"..0 * the Chwdmd,den POIA LUbat-ci amthe 6ai d le p bike and hiking fA" u L-U 6e netain®d nee o)C my Consulting Engineers ILdo. Pa Teeoneea OEM m ;6o Xed vehicle except .dWUW6L&d. 5. Fcaturte aveu lab i,li aFy of Qo-q caunoe . 4vzd fon nui�n 6y .the Chanlur,"ea Parch. DtAilzi.rt ai a negotiated p,,,L&. Thie /and =4;t 6e cleve loped a4 a go.q comwe. I%un 6. ienance of open A6de mmi U 6e the ;tozaZ 4edp0ndi.6.i,&-&, of NoAdA40v untU at 4nj;t the a vtil Phaee in giceaaEion c,a occupied. I;t, Ui 11 6e the tZdpondtht,li;ty o� the oune 7• 4 guar 0dee of a ceAai,n numhe2 of 6ui d&zg PeAmjj4 each years and fu.0 pcVwnf of the Pe&nl-:td 0ether AV ate 6u i 04 nod. Cxce-" Amdd, if any um% acamulate a© a ate&i on the .(crud. If #here aae any Aa-i I have foAp;Uen, pleue .Let me Aram. Re►nembe t, tm ate nox in a poA i oa ;toR. paepay aruy at ZU buns, .but rue MUZ w1A as close as pv44i.6.le rL.th bhe V.i,Llage ;to a 4uae an, egui fa&& We mW 6e :in ChmAamen On gull, 7, and ucr.LL contact you Am. Should you have any gueabione, pie ar_U me co.Lleet 3/2_37_00/1. Si.CeAe j, -314 L rni.e.L W. 'G. AB & B Associates Inc. August 10, 1972 Mr. Russell H. Larson Attorney at Law lst National Bank Building Minneapolis, MN 55402 Dear Russ: Last night the Planning Commission entered into a discussion relative to considering sizable developments (PUD's) planned for areas where utilities will not be extended for a number of years. A motion was made by the Planning Commission that I pose this problem with you and report back to the Planning Commission on Tuesday, August 22, 1972. Russ, to give you some background to our discussion during last night's meeting our agenda contained a discussion on the updating of Oakmont as well as the concept plan of Nordskov. Although I am not totally familiar with the Oakmont plan as I generally understand it, it is a development on 180 acres for 2,800 dwelling units. The development of same is to commence as soon as sanitary sewer is available to the site.• T am sure this is an oversimplification of the development, but we now have before us a concept plan for Nordskov which involves 240 acres of land including a specific proposal"for- 80 acres involving five or six land uses on that parcel. Again, no sewer and water are available. The concern I raised with the Planning Commission related to the importance of timing in the planning process and also the importance for our village to have development contracts with developers. An important item of these development con- tracts is of course the time scheduling that relates to each phase of the development. When the Village Council approves a planned unit development with no definite starting date other than that construction would begin when sewer and water Mr. Russell Page Two August 10, H. Larson 1972 is available the element of timing is lost in the planning and development process. Since our municipality is depen- dent on the decisions of the Metropolitan Council with respect to approving sewer interceptors, a development in affect could be approved by the Village Council and remain as a future plan for the Village for a long period of time. A plan or planned.unit development which makes sense to a community at the time of approval may not be in the best interest of'the Village if that same plan is built three, five or possibly ten years from now. To prevent the municipality from having a number _of these plans pending.with no scheduled starting date, could the Village of Chanhassen legally take the position that develop- ments will not be finally approved unless the utilities which are needed to serve that site are, also approved. Utilities and developments are kind of a "chicken and. egg" type of problem, but it may be possible for areas which will not be immediately served by utilities that a_con cePt approval of the plan could be given by the Planning„Commission. Then, when ut! ities are available to serve this site or are imminent that the developer.would then be allowed to proceed beyond the concept stage for subsequent approval by the Village Council. Russ, please call me if you this request. I would like to the Planning Commission Si L .1y Yours, j D�`;iel J . Herbst DJH:cg cc Mr. John Neveaux Mr. Adolph Tessness have a question relating to to'be prepared to.give an answer at our next meeting. i DATE: Gt c 7 v VILLAGE OF C°MIAASSEN PROPASED PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN Applicant: I Address 6 .i9 /., . Phone No m : /2 Properly Owner: Address Phone No. _ G- _ Plznned District Development Name: Type of DrawiAags Submitted: I. 2. 3. 4. S. 6. c� /� �,� 1 7 Ei f L • /-�iE * List on back if ;.here are more. Reconnnendation by Zoning Administrators: FORUM: 47-1 E-,) REC,*ULAR PLA14NING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 12, 1972 The regular meeting of the Manning Commission was called to order by Ward Passe. The following members were present: ward Passe, Nick Waritz, Arnie Ryba and '.tom Gabbert. John Neveaux, Dan Herbst and Jim Mielke were absent. MINA: A motion was made by Tory Gabbert and seconded by dick Waritz to approve the August 22, 1972, special Planning Commission Minutes. Motion carried. BURDICK P&RK ADDITIO14 (SKETCH PLAN) : Robert Brenny was present representing B. C. Burdick. The -a—ITgnment of the sewer and water across the Frontier Development Corporation property as is pro- posed in the 72-2 industrial Sewer and Water Project was discussed. Mr. Bloomberg had been present at the Public Hearing on September 11, 1972, requesting that the Council consider a new alignment which would put the sewer and water in the same align- ment as the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad. The Council had requested that the Tillage Planner and the Planning Commission consider this request. After considerable discussion a recommendation by the Village Planner was to leave the alignment as was proposed in the 72-2 initial project. n A motion was made by Arnie Ryba and seconded by Tom Gabbert that the Bloomberg proposal to move the alignment be rejected and the original, alignment as proposed by Schoell and Madson in the 72-2 Project and as shown in the Central Business District Study be accepted. Motion carried. Mr. Brenny explained the revised sketch plan dated September 7,l 1972. Mandan has been moved as was requested, approximately 35 feet to the east on County Road 16. No change in Lot 2, Block 3 except for a 30 foot driveway and utility easement has been added to the south portion of ]Got 1, Block 3 adjoining Lot 2 and Mandan. The Planning Commission explained to Mr. Brenny why they did not want Lot 2, Block 3 to be divided as shown and have access on County Road 16. REASONS:, 1. It does not comply with the Central Business District Study. 2, Mould require and extra curb cut off of County Road 16. A motion was made by Ward Passe and seconded by Arnie Ryba to recommend that the developer take into account the Planning Commission's desire not to have an additional curb cut and ask that he rearrange the lots so that all the lots can be served from Mandan. Motion carried. REGULAR PLANNING C0101ISSION MEETING -• September 12, 1972 -2- ', BERKEY SKETCH FLAN: Jim resented R deep the Berke Y P y planned unit development sketch plan which is comprised of 73 units on 22.5 acres (3.05 units per acre). The outlot on sake Minnewashta would only be for the use by the 15 single family lots. The 10.5 acres with 56 townhouses would result in a 5.25 density for the townhouse area. General discussion by the Planning Commission on this proposed Sketch Plan. A motion was made by Ton Gabbert and seconded by Ward Passe to table any action on this Sketch. Plan until October 10, 1972. At that time a report will be submitted by the Planner and the Village Engineer. Motion carried. NORDSKOV: Mr, Dan Adams representing the Nordskov Corporation was present explaining they revised Sketch Plan as follows: CONCEPT REVISION Our latest proposed plat plan is identical to the one originally submitted when we condi.der total number of units, and all intended construction. However, the course of our first meeting and subsequent discussions with Mr. Tessness, we have decided to incorporate as many of the suggestions tendered by him and the Planning Commission members as we possibly could. Since our original presentation in May we have done a complete boundary survey and topographic survey, and have done an additional feasibility study. These have caused us to modify our plans as follows: 1. In our original discussion we said we showed a water trail with the hope that we could do this, but if we could not get the water this would be a "green trail" with a drainage area in its center. Now, be- cause of the controversy relative to the availability of water, we are showing only a "green trail". 2. We agreed to a 9 hole golf course on our land and/or partly on our land and partly on the park land. tie new show 4 holes of a proposed golf course with pro- visions to go either into the park or into our next area of development. 3. Our original intention was to build 120 apartment unit., but the market at this time is not favorable for apart- ments and financing would be unavailable. Therefore, we are modifying the buildings slightly and make them Qpartment/condominiusms. w REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING H September 12, 1972 -3- 4. An inter -mix of apartments, condominiums, and town- houses is not compatibic, with a central recreation area. Therefore we are adding a recreation area in each.. phase of development and will dev elop the central area as a country club with a membership fee. This will be available to the General Public with a fee (lifetime) of approximately $600.00 per family and a modest annual fee for maintenance and upkeep. This with a maximum membership of 500 families. 5. One Planning Com i i.sasion member suggested that we might build taller buildings and allow more open spaces. This we have done and now utilize only 13% of the land for buildings. f. The quadraminiums as originally planned have been replaced with a newer, high quality plan we refer to as a Zero lot line garden condominium. The first phase would have the following recreational facilities: 1. Tennis court. 2. Swimming pool and sauna. 3. A 40 x 50 party room. 4. Tot let areas. All other phases will have their own recreational facilities and will be explained in detail as development occurs. The major recreational facility (golf course and club house' will be in phase five. The Resolution adopted by the Village Council. on September 11, 1972, entitled, "LIMITATION ON REVIEW OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS NOT SERVED BY MUNICIPAL SA TARP SEWER AND WATER" was explained in detail to the Nordskov people. A motion was made by Arnie Ryba and seconded by Ward Passe to table any further action on this sketch plan until the next meeting. Motion carried. LOTUS LAKE TOWNHOUSES ss Dave Nelson, Village Planner, explained his report. B i Bred niky, representing schoell & 1Kadson, Village Engineer, explained the engineering report. The Administrator read the Village Attorney's report. There was general discussion by the Planning Commission on the above reports. A motion was made by Ward passe and seconded by Arnie Ryba that before 1:O0 p.m. on September 21, 1972, the applicant submit to the Village a set of the proposed covenants, copy of the proposed lease agreements, and a plan showing the proposed street light arrangement. Their plans should also show the location of the access to the lift station and the lakeshore property requiring access. A statement on the dedication necessary for Erie Street. Location and statement on the easement necessary for the emergency accssss and fire Lane.(from Erie Street to the eastern part of the development). Notion carried. REGULAR PLANNING CGRMISSION MEETING - September 12, 1972 -4-- BUDGET: A. motion was made by Ward Passe and seconded by Arnie Ry5aa that the Planning Commussin Budget for the year of 1973 include funds for a Community Facilities Preliminary Study, further study on the Central Business District and Carver Beach and a detailed study on immediate Municipal State Aid street needs. The Administrator and the Planner to submit the dollar amounts needed for the above study areas. Motion carried. Mayor Klingel.hutz, Councilman Wolf and Richard Lyman, Sr. attended this meeting. A motion was made by Tom Gabbert and seconded by Arnie Ryba to adjourn. lotion carried. TIME -- 11:55 p.m. Adolph TeSsness August 17, 1972 Nordskov 639 Melody Lane Naperville, Illinois 60540 Dear ter. Adams t At the Planning Commission Meeting on August 8, 19720, Winutes enclosed),, the Planning Commission directed you to appear before them and present your sketch plan again because of the changes in concept in your new proposal. You will be placed on the September 12, 1992, Agenda, You should have available one plan that shoes the phase development, one with the street layout and one detail plan shoring the first phase. After the Planning Commission has given concept approval., you may proceed to the proposed preliminary plan. Sincerely, Adolph Tessness Clark -Administrator ATafe one. l cca Planning Commission Members U401 I ON August 17, 1972 TO: Planning Commission Members MOM: Adolph TeSsness SUBUCT: Nordskov The changes In the Nordskov Plan w,re "'scussed in detail Mr* Adan'3 on August 91 1972. The following items were discus,,,, K An accurate topography. 2* A street layout which considers and conforms topography of the land. to the 3- The dredged areas are in conflict with the to 0graphy in some areas and should be reconsidered. a- Mr- Adams stated that because Of the concern by geir AQnY people about the area to be dreded,th sketch Plan that will be 1972, Will show ed on September 12, this area a Present space only. green way Or open 4- 1 have instructed W. Adams to indicate on Bthe u building locations only on phase 1. their plans ut re phases the amount and style will b On all other 0 actual locations of the buildings. The Placing of e stated, not actual buildings will be done as the final Phases are, Presented. 5- Nbtdskov was instructed to explain in detail the changes in their, Oxiginal sketch " 5 story buildings Plan, such as: rE b- quadmini... changed changed " 10 story buildings. to garden apartments. 6- That no commercial facilities all residential buildings and are to be start until three phases are finished and facilities in the first the fourth phase construction started on 7. .bore detail on -commercial to be Phase v, and who can use"COuntrY Club" style, facilities, use 8- Some guest parking is necessary in all residenti., 9- More thought on the first 5 holes future locareas. the first hole would be in zbldanon. tianship to the club house. Where M E M O R A N D U M 11 -' page 2 NORDEROV 10. More detail on recreation facilities for each phase and specifically the first phase. 11. One plan should show exact boundaries for each phase. 12. No plat on the ten story building. A.T. cc: NOrdskov DESIGN PLAMM ING ASSOCIATES, -� 4826 Chicago Avenue So. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417 Phone: (612) 8 12.21 • 06 October 24, 1972 MEMORANDUM To: Planning Commission Village of Chanhassen From: Carl R. Dale, AIP Planning Consultant Subject:(Cordsk�ov'lrl-'ketch Plan I have given this proposed development plan a very cursor examination. It is obviously a veryy that could have significant impact upon the high density proposal Community. Great care should be taken in the review evaluate this proposal. In order to properly an to thoroughly Wing implications of this plan, it will require natyleasteanother It is my hope that such additional review time will not and inconvenience either the developer or the Community. -my Of this size, however, should be carefully evaluated by Project parties concerned. y all _1� f. �f Ca r Y { .Planni . ronsi?eratien j I iS at has i:ej , b fore t1he F-£JiMAiJ3lGn ft�i +"�►1t`te $�}��' U i N ti rf� now 3#?C certain 1 r'Cit�a7C2Ci5 .13ve.bear, male �.ems'.$ late&- plans a€i c3i"l is'l' t'es,P43it dated =!ctoL ,er• 24, 19721). this is a eery c0 llex, ��in�3 defls t.Y ;��rRPOsaFl that could F)av� sig-- f33 i ica31L i',I';aC ' "c`Q?i i 4 fo::muni i,::i"i e:1 lWJ, tils L.`lfl l ei1 €lS7sir? `E iliafje -pIa1) Iri.dCc r?S e3► of the land ." 01, `� x S Imo- f, N�'S V;:tt �l c� public -open 3:,�ts,C sl 13 t'.O �. _..� t,-i L i e c ta. s e , h e 'Villa -le . pla- sh i� v it � '.i � A 'i � T, � b : F nS ti .� i, regtilred. lagaj (3r4C,3ut1res. to 1 e-1:1e't that private 4#$!; CC3nS;d¢Y'F?d ia5i= diaS3 i3 b I c,. 1 S:Qc 1 ?„� .� s.el.v nta!)Iisned what wi l i , any `;� P l a s .ti i �'.: i i. �: "� } '^� .', e r ;� ` f r7 r+ i •7 _3 T 's s. {., �w '] f•+ tv (,� 4 l: i 1 1'I d V 1 e cJ .. { e, �k f C a c a f e e La L e t o .� i� � C) � the e to existing nor rearby ll aiIu; t';i s is an limpQ3"te'tnt item botf , f rom. a f and us, 4. an y traf flc. circ.ilatior.. Theproposed l.FeVeIG,1'7'ent, s 1 L`.'~. 15-sl�'1. '.ew[?a t x i jsC8ri3; ci )=:,a1'e,ixtl y i,s}=? has, �0't 3 ,wry `..N. 4 � -1 .0 t r, iiti J i.: i'1 .s � ..�41 t i � +�. J v-..i .i i {�J and "-- ! �� '� as an � �'ia �7 �. �t��i �1eerio t'; � :.Cti1Z"?':3t S�':^`!1 ��`s Q i` r � R32 S ? C "1fIlIcts and' ",�7Lr}i. jall <1•i 'c�: ti,. :t� :i ; }S? 3 .��FD�r to as n e 3 d 1; 11= _. c a 'l y '. ; ., `� 'i 3 •'� _,� � M ; ; • _ ,' �. �' r, � '� '"T ' ....._ 's� � .�. .. 4. ; t i� o J :2 c 1. :j - 2ya .'] ,,!a a. J re.24 tom..�.i ',••r� _ ro s S S I' tile S" 3c?r l [ n Y � w :J a ,. «. ��i!✓:�.. .. »1 .�,i�� >T, t: .L ,a.� sr ✓a i'1.+.`�. i � �_i n:i a .4.: f' 1 ;iF .a:. �i "?� � JL.r. u t �:-1 t:J t. 1 T,,t i1J . ` Ca- 1:. `v.. C i. ✓� .1 ? v�.. Ji.. i.�n •3 i '�a� , ...t r. 7 ` E s_ se ;e ;1' f _ " , E r ry 1 r -i n . : bT rd L ti �a ..z... i - .r;�[''.a ,;Y a_r, .�1c. ::�`,z rc c>,+..r-,.I".; ;. .� -s,v .i' � fy l�r�frG Lx"! w � ';'J n t�i �•�t •-2t�n� a 3 .'i - ti v c: ;_ i a. l-, e ,. T :s r r. r c, t? y_• i o t a w arid' ri d' o thers yip f' �"9Sc *Itt�(4 j >.. �a yl i•- (s�; ye Io CCU or pro: -ose in Li' 1? `.�i.0 re I ie�� ii L��i ��. O i,;;R, cu rniNr ...ropes a � i.ir 3 v�..s •bhi� i�,a a'i; ii I ar g c n s be lat -st (E tispcurrent. -rc -1eCi~fi. �J c e r taai ? C0.1;1Ail i r4:.i?Y 1-1s air eadv mad,for laid 'Co the r1o7'i 1. 1 ..saai'S✓ oD Vn,r"Four e`-a-ni e) 35cTLio2C5' e?- - 4 }itrse i s :-c)t at all clear- the :scis t recen 1 y sur mi revised i i q a7 r� �r ^? n '� i s r : a A a. n s� - t rt n y. 3 ~'• [ a ., i rn ua�" _i .J R. i. i _ar d . i ilu t V��.' �...a c.. st"a i.ura of o .her �..J or%a sed (( ;� 7. .c-ant, UIan subrissions ndi ca c_,`,a;iQ2s i n kcusi na t,,n;>r. pop- �; u1 a -i;:co: poman has no � lbee^ submi tt2c� i rdicat! rrq the . ,yne of it pc pull a L3 on expected to by housed ; such n 7ent s r! ee,-Jedl to deter- U� ; ii m? ��I-;3A� n �'..cr�aLi..r�al ;.._�.>;.� �� ,.., .�atcr. ec c 'd sr ev .aaz .I-dr:- F.- vrt_ impact per, the �...s .s c,.ti Vj l -ys t !1 Im and' ca v- a yama ✓- liC F a c i! i4ir1S a1 1 SL! -, r i ccst L ono-ran.Qe land -and "ilai nter, tiro ;� i jai. �.�'� ::0% v� r"' i I s a �'J i.l i.t�lr that, Lam.+ � y � �} :. i i, s•-� {N "�' i �L 1 L.. 1 on s c - L..L area ],i L u l d be ae. d- undt r' i c" a c-,,'e owners associ a li on a �. }�,;.� G-� � soLie 'cjor,�rc v. . 0. Plans l^io noa. iii(iic�a �4� i�i �1 l�iS a�`x.3 for iies�+.7 E(jti circulation i or 1--1 r +\ ,V S i a. L a,. '- r 1 ff a' ? `-1 i ,- A, c/� r1 \1 J J i r i ..i i J S. f - n v� i� f= r ;+ r �i rl � Y. i t,. » �` s i+. f? 1. t ... -,. s y ... __ i. r : t , ., ?l - .. � ' 9 '{ •� i' c :-J t S'1 } 1 t .. 1' { z J 1 '9 • j# f Fi e rms - »4 : icy „E' �t1,{a � - �I r ric { accCcss zceus and e-u ?marcurn i,o Ss Jons. U .i s a i3 T '�` x L .. �.? 3 d. 1 T Z k t Our n ,�I ..t u -.i t L:. , r] ! .1 .t_ n -i- ? . 'i S $u`,e %oL;si; Ei v � aft L r; 3a'" >^t7 .A..t_ y ,/ .y e / da J i3 c ?. '. tl r m .iY {, i3 f.it� S t:. .a k3 ;r� La.a r ` a -� .L +x .� 4 L i i.E ; .ie S c 2 3 %. fie .. i,. 7t, ki ✓ Jv :. - i :'S 4! V r i . c ice,.., 0 y: . 12. { is not knm➢ if -i mir1lot analysis h-as been y�i.. 1, y ✓I;w y^t� e C�i'w a.. C7. ,fir Y6 1 ~•v ll�i fl ice.•. a�'� 1 i��? �ii ;s ii%'r.4 ��ii may nfit T_n t r a:i` S';� . c�J.1SIts;:" 'titn�'zd 0f i,<�,`, � I,.r; �yatn'i' u i 1 ,^, '�Y;a s. �� i"�yt�va. ;on o t.i .'1 i'tc� '.:�� L L udgi T1S {•; 1e3h k s;. s'Ii i s ? . (aC3'``S Io1 Vr✓i .I .: ,7 Y'y is�3,.ui1 v aS fx Zr _iJ1i, E` t! �! :R :.l 9 ! �,.y .} c.c- 4 f Ji 11 a, �. :t sa ,s lv'`nI ..,T �r a t.' i er;;"J.; 3 S ri fin. t. }=c. 3'6i �..i r.. i ��i Lt:J ../., .s' �S i. „f"'.� 1� 1.0 :.A%U..?ia.tio'n o =.; J•t: i?Sc ti,,C- i,a ...) ri irii.__.i...v�A..2S IiA. I.. is - o r 1.3 ra Zlr i f _-- a `; cV t_,IiJ,I"_rr rp r,")'tom. us us ,j1 o,, e c t aC-c jys`.i i.ic, La ke Ann. 4 i, a ," 3 .i'. . ..i :.. t. s ., i L 7 t: _ �� •.... i ' ? j i "47 iv a I a C-t `v ccD31•'s.'s. tij :Y' i - r -t A w ."•. '''-.3 s ..la �' iL 3, .- a d. �J J a ii �� - •Jr 2 -s i -`� ri 3 so, + re, -- -J3 4.� t: i i -1� x.- iJ •._ ri ... J1 fi P.i;+ ( 3 r i7;^ •+` . ... i. u + : `1J' f� 7 ::s _ -• t G: {J+ d. t.. '. 4',. ya. 3 i� y. yd 8 rid y�� t. 0 M� •S /. > i i� 4i a�•� 4� 7 is �.. L LP U i• ] i.= d if n l o L �� ._' { ^ .•i .'-�. 3 L P. ,j i r o S i J a , S S + moons. dire Sui a� r= � i='S�3???��i� lit3i y development Lr i! f Ta s ^ �t ! 713E !. - n 1 if 3 i:i �a,i:r � C. 1 ' i, +.; i �, _s.c,�� 1. p 4T tr�JC ,rise = i.G`r.c f . ? t4,a s. %:2l Jroasd uCnsi ty iS 'j .[ :'U:. ;s i j i..vr :: ii !.?',v t'rl' i ..W 7r1 ?•.r i_a! #�.. +4,n r+ f4 y� } �y. d� r r- :! 1 Si .. }.,.'_. i:Si Y 3 t Qvv L.n al qua x ies '.l".'a t a5SCt, i tj.' iri L4i a •^fi_;ur:an area so :ii ita�ji: - Yro + the �? g- r�r ei: Lral c es a�'^ •' i- 7 Mg -her t : Y. s � �+ p y� «f 'r n Y. S:'.. ! Gi �,74 Lil.�i :1 Li Es tli VJ• 3dt uli�� isy GAi L' i is t a file �ros� nsi+ 1e ev-11aatLd on ttic hrsis of -�� several Corsi- orations SItc''?Vuas t-j ii7 33 i1ngi + �#i2U C a c i ' �:access (larr,, r, !i a}-' iuiOn to current Sian proLosai,. ! !! TT y neeri n anal Ysis of pi an'led Si+i2 �arJ/ S�' ;er ACT tJ 3`?(` other +: r=a`f Ci upon7 .Sc?001s and ot;"fer pulbl7C idCil itid�$ and S?�'YIC?5 }' 1 _ kJaS G u J,^, POP"1z:1-ion cc"; -tune.. tt^ c S;I�,�Ti#last � r± c t` i � :� f '+ t` .. .t .. r y, ;.s �F- . t - J a concrn4 J1 3:Id'1 ,�ii c=-a�i� :':i nk.: !s ?.tJ �S 1.. k? 'i'in '�;?(''' .i y T y� o f L ?f o i l tl xvn :`.ie- i e.. i -i ^ Y,; ,Sro,J Ii l / :7 ''.�S' J i 1 ~;"'�,�.a Cam. lam. '�. r ..,�-� ;.+ 9 be jon:- i r accordance tdi 1n Vt1le f`;i I ing is i -, i 'ti��t is '!ereJJJ :,f'"anta` _! oni;' `!or CF nc• -_nt plan r?!mr, vai c0 Cer,It 1IarrI is �,":i in saa '" s r act 3'I � in- a I ii-7 trom a,", v a- t 3SS i •-. : �. ,, x •� �1i -' ., ., u 4 �.: 1 u : >r j � ■ y Z i, u 3 �: s i i � .i i i. '..�.:� s +i i : ': '7 ' ,•. � T .. � F c• k` ;� iy. / ss t: ;. .'. 1 ti s w rn ;i con "i 3, 0 'i ` .�;:`s , . c s i s � �: i. '}'4. �' ; e {` y� acid ,li 1 7, `.�a sj ).�:en s ui"t Cl;1 'Ae d �'- �� +'tt< .S -"."1` .� i}ic' 1nal "I � ry'` •- y 1 s) r`••�--} .1 1 1 . i a n • T p } o 7 a 1 : 4 a'. 11 ? v ;- i s =...:: ^" 4 ! i G s i..i !. i. iL. Y } x r. -.i s 3 S ! '>, • e.� + 3' • ii �i � 'G v . p (� Y n no '.':3 f i.: �Si�� 'f 7 i't y Cou. i Yt0 SU, S ��;11-St -2Dpra ai `3i 't 12 ` r2 aii ed i Pia?'s re:�jit`?d o to e St—, T i Lt i�+:�i' Iks3is v, � i. ±?-;sJ ,. d = Von s- '1 9 i:: 1 ii J �' s� u j :i i o r '. i _: a ,.i s ;; i'� '' ^ -' s•� .'• • n �. _ e! i 1 1 d" a i tiff c_'n i qii? ieJ : is a?'; t� Ica <3'? )?"?'yi'.;i'. �aCei €?"`' '{ r'ov3i o it :?;:.'.':!i or t7rvvo,;}chi? ,'`?7ij S�rJ,i+:E ? S tj`ft% 7r i172 06 t i,a i yai e s zk.- } �C?:d e,i �: 7 t j r3 ? i�7 T'L i, i•� �! !! M � �} y1� i aJ y3y� •�'+ �• `�- a Y3 t }+ +13i S1. t++�Fl iY.f S S•i 4S U— TT�v :1 •.: `f ii V 1 = !+ a :•� ;,r7 1 �1 �: ,ri .. D J ,' ft .may _ ¢ i n y ' ; ,Z ;"4 ..nr r� 3 i j S `! f �J ! i �i IF + is ' . Y r 1 ') - _j• .0 }3a :3 i ' sx S 0V C0-1')13?1 `3 �i .x��• _ i � ? S L) 1 .ys1e .(i ro :3r 0a.+i(_}' L.:ii] .r uc'i, _"'. :':�' �..} ;�; i j ;'? 'S'•:sd^ c€i ,.•`; �? ,P'` }?3 -fit}•_, r i w.,ry ..f C C):.i=� 1 i �'=1 : "I 4. 1. r:a 3� : "] s r i i-Ie, tite C'.:?C �:} � aj7lii'+J+Ja is a i it.?? ', l i i f t .� i 'a i1 ii i�f t ?-7DI ZI0-11 <a? I)i s?f7 :�i Y i) 1 ; n i ?� 1 r•„ sn ::.. - -1 r• 'i �3 � � � ~ 3 i i 7 � i. i' . n.+ it � f 1! �' P�} i [. '�. � � i:tas r' 3;. ~ai�iC CoTi% i:` a---pr .va as �`,t 1�?�i�: on J i J S ' '.+1�, i:1.1e,4; Sx'3 ?;1P'}'Ov�a: iS SP9.CiY?i:aliy extended by a'z ! on Of the Council or subsequest detailed plans as require-d are °oUnd FLA777"? PEPHT '0100nr 6. 1372 pan und"Pta"! did the cOnccpt 2,-royal is HOW "Wen K th, Vilinly recinded ov TO& hwrRy requestud ty s0alt Turtter do ravlov Ly tvn Vill,,, j , , • Plans for Loci 0--- •kervice or c0mnonents: Construction Qrdcr (StM devniulgent plan) Such other Wormation as requested bj.7jjja,e 5 t a f -f, Further d9tailed plans shall, however, be Submitted as follows: in accurdarcn yj th the Qnstruction Order "an) CO"Onaat On a Mr -by -year basis wick said plans _ dealln;M ORA MUM pronased dayclonment for the construction period I, i ndi C a W-i J �A As requested v the mians con.w, pertaining tc jullic naedg,` sucl as streets, utilitl2s, laheshare use, drainagef fire pro- tOctien. and the like, Such requests may be q Qaees and/or the entire area coverinq hy the conc,,t I F1 an. i 1 Grading permits shall not be a) Satisfactory arrancements hav, Won made for utility service; A Ganyral Plan OF 5eavlooplot pbeen approved in Went Mail Q cutline grading nEys for public streetsjlufltiable surfac2 Mor drainage, Buildinq perrits for structurns of 3zy zyce will not te more Antailld plans Ab,Q ,QQ, elevations, Wical floor plans, jandscap said plans shoply, hujldj,q� irg, ,d 1,IQ j,Qail may be Sub"Wj MY f0r the first stape of dnve1c7jent 3s g, UNK in the Qnstruction Ord2r Component provided the 6eneral Plap of 5evel,p,,,t is also approved In suFficient detail to warrant stage development roval.'' a PPYK 18. if such approval WnWQ is grantod at this tin,, K, steps Would he Way: 1) A clear and MY-dats set of drawings anj ttatj,tj,,l d,ta SAO" Ne suhmittad for rnview by the various inzerest:, involvoi and suqIcstcd in Ws Wanning report. 2) Q, over - all genbral plap of devy (density. circulatinns,etc zopqayt sqould then be amended ) as deeald dcsiravla anj ncenssary by t"D planning Gunmiss!07 Such a ravisd! ralaka tu t0 105ting 11'� n1an SnPQY ClArly surrounjin; areas. patmlai nazurn nf tn? aijacent aN 0) AgUealtnts should he reachzd of various Public inprova"ant concerninq tho narury and financing S such as streets ao utilities. 41Deta"'ad n1ans SNOW than Ka prepared for the first stage of developnebt. In order to expedite the above procedure, it might be desirable for the developer to meet with the various interests involved to coordinate and work out details in order to save time at public meetings. DESIGN PLANNING ASSOCIATES, INC, 4826 Chicago Avenue So. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417 Phone: (612) 822-2106 November 8, 1972 *v b PLANNING REPORT N-OV 1972 aFcE[VED For: Planning Commission o? NILLAG£OF, Village of Chanhassen, Minnesota `4�-;cHAHN. By: Carl R. Dale, AIP l`�9��i'Zfi'►�� Planning Consultant Subject: Planning Review - Nordskov Sketch Plan Planning Considerations ---� I. This matter has been before the Planning Commission for quite some time now and certain revisions .have been rude in the latest plans submitted. As noted in an earlier report (dated October 24, 1972) this is a very complex, high density proposal that could have sig- nificant impact upon the Community. 2. Currently, the Comprehensive Village Plan indicates all of the land in ouestion as being potential public open space. if this is not to be the case, the Village Plan should be amended in accordance with required: legal procedures to reflect that private use considered most desirable. It should be definitely established what will, and what will not, be "public" land in this general area. 3. Plans submitted for review do not indicate the relationship of the development to existing or potential development of adjacent and nearby land; this is an important item both from a land use viewpoint and traffic circulation. The proposed development site is somewhat isolated and would greatly affect adjacent land in the future. 4. Traffic generation is a major concern; apparently the developer has not submitted any traffic studies and perhaps this should be taken as an opportunity for the village to utilize the services of a Traffic Engineer to assist in evaluation of this proposed project. There are several items of concern: a) Internal traffic circulation and parking. There would appear to be some conflicts and potential hazards. Also, it is not clear as to what are proposed public and private streets. b) A report should be secured on snow plowing and other maintenance considerations. c) The relationship of the project streets to the existing and pro- jected Village street and highway system in the area; such relationships extend well beyond the specific land involved. W PLANNING REPORT November 8, 1972 Page 2 5. The proposed density (net and/or gross) is quite which raises several questions: a) Can such density be accommodated by the planned sanitary sewer capacity? b) Is the planned sewer and traffic capacity for this area adequate to accommodate both the proposed current development and others which may be developed or proposed in the future? The nature of the current proposal implies that similar high density will be forthcoming on land to the west of the current project with certain committments already made for land to the north. 6. The purpose, usefulness, and ultimate use of the proposed four hole golf course is not at all clear; the most recently submitted, revised plot plan does not clearly indicate the nature of other proposed recreational facilities. 7. Recent plan submissions indicate changes in housing types. A pop- ulation component has not been submitted indicating the type of population expected to be housed; such a component is needed to deter- mine on -site recreational needs and to evaluate the impact upon the school system and other public facilities and services. 8. Long-range land ownership and maintenance plans are not clear; it is assumed that, at least in part, portions of the area would be placed under control of a home owners association. It may also be that the developer intends to utilize a variety of approaches to this plan element. 9. Plans do not indicate provisions for pedestrian circulation or possible trails (bicycle, horses, pedestrians, snowmobiles, etc.). 10. The Fire Department and Police should be asked to evaluate emergency access needs and turn -around provisions. 11. The current plan utilizes some housing types that are relatively new to this Metropolitan Area; the specific nature of some is not indicated. 12. It is not known if a market analysis has been conducted but the market absorption ability in this location may not be adequate for consideration of ten (10) story buildings. Impact of the project upon other market conditions in the Chanhassen area is also a question 13. The proposed commercial development seems to be of very high quality but the location, currently itolated, is open to question and subject to evaluation of ldnd use potential to the immediate west. 14. It is not clear if the developer proposes project access to Lake Ann. PLANNING REPORT November 3, 1972 Page 3 15. Statistical data submitted is difficult to evaluate and may or may not be in accord with the very latest plan revisions. Also, pro- posed residential densities are difficult to determine on an accurate basis due to the way in which presented; ap arently, however, the gross density would be approximately ten( 10 units per acre although this computation also includes street area. 16. It is suggested that if the Village does not elect to utilize the land in question for park or other public purposes, this site could well be considered suitable for a planned unit development of mixed uses. It is further suggested, however, that the proposed density is robabl� too hi h and not in keeping with the environmental qualities norma y associated with a suburban area so distant from the higher density of the central cities and first tier suburbs. In any event, it is recommended that the gross density be evaluated on the basis of several considerations such as the following: a) Traffic impact and planned capacity and access (larger area in addition to current plan proposal). b) Engineering analysis of planned sanitary sewer capacity and other utility requirements (also on an area -wide basis). c) Affect upon schools and other public facilities and services (based upon population component to be submitted). 17. As a general "concept" of planned, mixed uses - the project would seem to have merit; if approval is considered at this time, it might be done in accordance with the following: "Approval is hereby granted only for concept plan approval. A concept plan is defined as an abstract idea generalized from and dis- associated from any particular instances. The applicant has submitted such information as he deems necessary to explain the general intent and this has been found to be in general conformity to the Municipal Plan. Approval of the Concept Plan attached herewith shall in no way bind the Village Council to subsequest approval of the detailed plans required to be submitted later under terms of this PUD Use Permit. Concept Plan approval is for the abstract idea presented only and in no way signifies approval, nor binds the Council to future approval of element or component details submitted as of November, 1972. Due to the large size, complexity, and magnitude of public concerns plus the development time involved, it is hereby declared to be public polciy and in the interests of the public welfare that details of the plan elements or components shall be reviewed and considered in stages as developent proceeds. No grading, building or other construction permits small be issued by the Village until all conditions of this Permit have been fully complied with. At this time, the concept approval is limited only to recognition of the plan as being in general conformity to the Municipal Plan. Said concept approval shall become null and void on November 1st, 1973, unless said approval is specifically extended by action of the Council or subsequest detailed plans as required are PLANNING REPORT November B, 1972 Page 4 found unacceptable and the concept approval is thereby recinded by action of the Village Council. The applicant is hereby requested to submit further detailed plans for review by the Village consisting of the following elements or components: Land Use Service Facilities Circulation Construction Order (stage development plan) Subdivision Such other information as requested by Village Staff Further detailed plans shall, however, be submitted as follows: a) In accordance with the Construction Order (stage development plan) Component on a year -by -year basis with said plans dealing with actual, proposed development for the construction period indicated. b) As requested by the Village Council pertaining to public needs, such as streets, utilities, Lakeshore use, drainage, fire pro- tection, and the like. Such requests may be by stages and/or the entire area covering by the concept plan. Grading ;permits sdiall not be issued until: a) Satisfactory arrangements have been made for utility service; b) A General Plan of Development has been approved in sufficient detail to outline grading needs for public streets, suitable surface water drainage, and the like. Building permits for structures of any type will not be issued until more detailed plans have been submitted; said plans showing building elevations, typical floor plans, landscaping, and similar detail may be submitted only for the first stage of development as outlined in the Construction Order Component provided the General Plan of Development is also approved in sufficient detail to warrant stage development app- roval. 18. If such approval (concept) is granted at this time, the following steps should ?oe taken: 1) A clear and up-to-date set of drawings and statistical data should be submitted for review by the various interests involved as suggested in this planning report. 2) The over-all general plan of development should then be amended (density, circulation ,etc.) as deemed desirable and necessary by the Planning Commission. Such a revisdd plan should clearly relate to the existing and potential nature of the adjacent and surrounding areas. 3) Agreements should be reached concerning the nature and financing of various public improvements such as streets and utilities. 4) Detailed plans should ashen be prepared for the first stage of development. In order to expedite the above procedure, it--mtgtrt—ire-desirable for th-e PLANNING REPORT November a, 1972 Page 5 developer to meet with the various interests involved to coordinate and work out details in order to save time at public meetings. h 350 Metro Square Building, 7th & Robert Street, Saint Paul, 3;innesota 55101 Area 612, 222.2i2:; December 27, 1972 Mr, Adolph Tessness, Administrator Village of Chanhassen BOX 147 Chanhassen, ssen Minnesota 55317 v„a...aGi.a.� , Ref:.. Lake Ann Interceptor, Phase II Dear ::r. Tessness: This letter is in response to your request for information on 'the scheduling of the Lake Ann Phase II Intcrcaptor Project, This project was approved by the Metropolitan Council as part of the Five -Year Capital Irnprovements Program: as Project 72-05. The approved Five -Year Program provides that the project is budgeted for construction during 1974. The Board's tentative schedule, 1rased on the Five - Year Capital Program, provides that the Engineering Deport for the project would he completed by November, 1973; the plans and specifications completed by February, 1974; construction would be initiated jr, September, 1974 with construction completion in December, 1975. The project will be covered by a grant application to the Environmental Protection Agency for funds to assist in the construction. The grant request will be made for Federal Fiscal Year 1975 Funds. This means that the project could not be placed under construction until after the beginning of FY1975, which would be after July 1, 1974. This is the current status of the project as approved by the Council and +-I e Sewer Board, I hope this information will assist the Village of Chanhassen in its local plann`n effort , Very truly yours, Ric, f ' ' Dough y Chie: ministra RJD:R-.KD:kb cc: Lonnie Dye, Chief Engineer, MSB n R Iil lllS $:il►h ;lfl son ii,l� i'! ih�r��e'�N�a ui lAk-`I M1itil 01,111 �'a�Tii:�i `ttro�rlPe�d GBAREASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE • P. O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 a (612) 474-8885 December 29, 1972 Mr. Dan Adams Nordskov Land Development Corp. Naperville, Illinois 60540 Dear Mr. Adams: At our Planning Commission meeting of November 28, 1972, the Village Administrator was directed to secure from Metropolitan Sewer Board a definite time table for implementation of Phase II of the Lake Ann Interceptor. The Village is currently operating under Council Resolution #911723, Limiting Planned Unit Development Districts not currently served by Sanitary Sewer and Water to stay at Sketch Plan (Concept) stage of Ordinance #47 until these utilities are imminent. Today the Village received a communication from Mr. Richard Dougherty, Chief Administrator, Metropolitan Sewer Board, dated December 27, 1972 in regard to Lake Ann Interceptor, Phase II. In ,light of this in- formation I believe you should now proceed to Preliminary Development Plan as specified in Section 14.05, Paragraph 3, of Ordinance #47, Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. Please stay in contact with us and particularly with Mr. Carl Dale of Design Planning, the Village Planner, who will direct you on the steps necessary to the completion of your application of rezoning. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions in regard to this project. JN:ks cc: Village Administrator Village Council Village Attorney Planning Commission Carl Dale Sincerely �yours, Vohn L. Neveaux CAA) Chairman, Planning Commission Village of Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 350 Metro Square Building, 7th & Robert Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 December 27, 1972 Mr. Adolph Tessness, Administrator Village of Chanhassen Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Ref: Lake Ann Interceptor, Phase II Dear Mr. Tessness: DEC 1972 RECEIVEDtn VILLAGE op, 07, .CJ4ty4NHASsa, yl MINN. Area 612, 222-8423 This letter is in response to your request for information on the scheduling of the Lake Ann Phase. II Interceptor Project, This project was approved by the Metropolitan Council as part of the Five -Year Capital Improvements Program as Project 72-05. The approved Five -Year Program provides that the project is budgeted for construction during 1974. The Board's tentative schedule, based on the Five - Year Capital Program, provides that the Engineering Report for the project would be completed by November, 1973; the plans and specifications completed by February, 1974; construction would be initiated in September, 1974 with construction completion in December, 1975. The project will be covered by a grant application to the Environmental Protection Agency for funds to assist in the construction. The grant request will be made for Federal Fiscal Year 1975 Funds. This means that the project could not be placed under construction until after the beginning of FY1975 , which would be after July 1, 1974. This is the current status of the project as approved by the Council and the Sewer Board. I hope this information will assist the Village of Chanhassen in its local plannini effort. Very truly yours, Ric J. Dough y Chie ministra RJD:MKD:kb Julius Smith, Anoka County • Carver County 0 Dakota County 9 Hennepin County • Ramsey County a &ott County 0 Washington County y DESIGN PLANNI �G ASSOCIATES Ii _�_- ''P826 Chicago Avenue So. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417 Phone: (612) 822-2106 March 21,. 1973 ,��'��`, `'��c'S Mr: Daniel W. Adams M0R 9 Nordskov Land Development Corporation REo 639 Melody .Lane vI4, Naperville, I1 i i not s 60540 lCNANNALO MINN. Re: Chanhassen, Minnesota PUD �P�6'S Dear Mr. Adams: At your request, I am submitting comments concerning information that may still be lacking in your submission. Also, I have enclosed the Planned Development Procedure - Check List which clearly outlines procedures and informa-. tional requirements. This message is somewhat delayed -since we had -rather expected to be contacted by a local professional and could work directly with him to organize It is still my hope that Your material and presentation, sure it would You take this suggestion as I am greatly assist both you and the Community. Notations have been made on the Check List which ma a You in developing your nextpresentation aeu sssiat our last meeting. The following commentsareofferedfort Your consideration: 1- A part of the problem has been not so much with the lack of documents submitted but rather with the way they have been prepared and presented. It is for this reason I have suggested you retain someone highly skilled in this procedure With experience in this area Of Minnesota. 2. Your map showing the -site -in relation'to the surroundin area is at least adequate but does not clearly show g alternatives which may be necessitated by future market conditions, changes in public road -plans, changes in nearby private development plans and the like. This explanation is necessary in order that Village officials that you have thoroughly analyzed thcan e site in relation to change-s--that may Your site. occur in and about 3. The proposed land uses and population densities should be presented in a very clear fashion recognizing local attitudes and changes that may be necessitated in the future by both public and private trends. As I have stated many times, your data projections are meaningful Mr. Daniel W. Adams _2_ March 21, 1973 only when clearly understood and agreed to by the Community. 4. I would suggest that the topography map be submitted both separately and with your general plan overlayed. A USGS topo enlarged.for the entire site might also be useful. 6. Public and private open space to the stage development Proposals should be geared p program and the population component. For example, it should be clearly stated that open space will be geared to anticipated population ty empty nester housing, family housing,lly h for example, ousin, and so on all have differing open space and recreationalgneeds. There are also alternatives as to what might be public and what might best be public. 6. The architectural style should be clearly presented for the anticipated first stage -of development. Your explanation Of potential future, diversified housing in later stages should be clearly thought out and presented. 7. A set of simple, clear graphics indicating stage development Potential which would include both public,.(road, utility, etc.) and private development in some logical sequence. 8. A draft of the proposed agreements, relating to the maintenance of common ropen �areasonsrisonvenrequirnts ed, prior to public hearing. 9. A clear and professional approach to presenting and explaining each of the plan Components as noted on the attached outline is needed. Except for the draft of agreements, covenants, home owner's .association or other approach to ownership and maintenance of common areas, your submission is rather complete in the sense that all "items" are covered but apparently in a manner not yet acceptable to the public officials. This does not add much, if anything', to our previous discussion but perhaps it will aid you, in.your next approach to the Village. Please let me know if you have any questions or need further information. Cordially yours, Carl R. Dale, AI: President Enclosure CC; Adolph Tessness fi "-'e is t`.Y, 4 „" p•c « a �ULLLAGE QF CflANHASSEN � r :' • ':' 1 3 9 V t 1 l i'd Pi ed Devel:` a ,t .P a-- n�? _ omen rocedu re-'CHECnK L T ST. a ° t� The following are s t" ep: ;gyp Vie, taken` and,. information .require, to bta? Pianr�ed Detielapment:`.'Zon`ing. F S:ech,' Plan c t C. repare and submit. to' PIannina Cr�mm•asSTa Pur ose R '. t ` y h j P informal 'discusslon',and camment . : f -- natiop,.of conformity to `Comprehensive y Vil la" e, g tan. information SchematIc-{.s-�te PIah indi.catin Required 4; g }:in.. a .goueral ,°.fashion 1 ocations , types-3 and densities` of proposed 1•and�-ises. +. ;'intent and p ..• s pur oso.` of .development,...- ransportation, facilities and an4� !� f pubIiC s 9. u e prgposa-1 s•. App.i caa ma: F 3subm.t,such �nformatiau_.as a. necessary,;; to `eXatureh Ebel p eves development proposa] planned _ �rp0Sed ,°Pro {.. 4 y nar t' Deve1 o'pment, PI an Y Mare `detailed sketch p'an based 'upon. :,sketch plan -discussion requ�r.ed ' to submi prior scion of a,PP�icatio'n ' PUD zbn� r►g, f - t 4Purpose 3 i WF 3. t )T fs` t Rev7 ew "for ; gone+ral` acceptance 'Pr -or to{ expends ture 'of .. effo.;rt .and: fursd5 .for mare elaborate= plans to bo re- a y quired for` : e fi nai approval Informat10 -� n: _ d, 1�1aps and :drawl ngs-- Vuh� ch :;may be in: Required atic r a schem form, short ng r "tir a 7n relattonto surrauning S a area .and 'Uses ;� ) Proposed;10nd .uses _ b •„. c) P,,opuiaiian densities, d) Land .use ies'. ,ntens.i t 7 e) Existi`rg`°to o r P 9 aphy -and. tree covers .�: buildin s, ;stree s., and .other si ,. 9 t 1 features te. 5) Qreonased Public ^and.'private _scree; N P space proposed.,; (public arzd or °* h pri vate') µ°Architec ural le is y 6 o�aisd �. Written state i rgs ment..indicating natur--e. appl`i cants i terest n' `p°oper E,4d, `-' expected "timing of development, and description. of above required maps and drawings k ?, e : , �., r - - ., Yb .-t a• -f-lsr F ';,>., c .i. •� ... j2. .�- r. k.-.�:- , -Y °.y"-.y s.-a< _ .. j Y f 't ac i ti i; cri (y yry : '+, /� [� + 1 /y {.. '3Y s " -`,1 'll L� i? ,t� •. U o� I u, L'n W�V�.4 J.�, 6 �U�. r'pa,sn spa �p��..s..- + pUe.-said �ut�id =°.:S0AII aCgo� �o ;luawa4e4s Yan:Lid,c�as�g� e= =y dt�� u d t;�s le L"� ens } Uauaduao� fU-io �nD, LT. p �e5 • � u,auodwa•� e Y a"sil' .pue7''ay d� Palo as eaAe l u y► $�, l , pauue d U L oLtia,A c o :any '.to } s'ua L's.CAD .Ad aye a ` :L� .Laa: aq ,�etu', s.o:.�s.Aa .ui Aa t"pns':.Ue � saue k. i i .. p L; U;An4_-1: LR . pap do p suo�,A�das ` aplla6 ' swb� s�Cs! �uaas .fietn-.auc ;. ' 4 s Ru l044 ' uv swa sets .gjns : ol:uo �.Rdu � Ldp Y 4 _pig 6AsIArl!: ,:,_t.•:,, sa.Ae zLluLwiaq t`so�rao LllI�L�YlC3dsu,A� c�u�naaby� LRao:lypy a�3ut sai L'L'La � ;g�i�� ;� uOWdalanaQ'., o ue.ld :leuaua� 11t3 .SV ;pas.ndoad :sots: L 6e1 uoi �:.aadsue, .CEO 40 3 t�a�x . pue , uoi� a L ,LEaaUsfa,a°t�� .�� av� ,°but has sd w _to 'dew 4 4s`Lsuo Lugs 4UOUOOWOlr Un L4 Lnaa tV uo 4d trasa® �. ti, i•:,,�4 ! a`R) :b t i 'iY 'S' Y s '.. i . a ..r. s�uauaduaoj�ioL�el1n�aa •r. f -`A ._ .... ___. --�— .-_ .•- 4 Y „t v f "' q:C. ; r- tr y ?S a i t .. y �1ar I ti.�nW.Av� ; s �<<uc pasrt sp,al?Pljl?q;s p,ue S&Ld:L3u_'Lj . saA'eaaCgoo uawa�e� s= and L�Apsap ,`e u L'e-.uo� os`Le Legs 1uauu.dlW0JPLeS pue l �o; sasn.''.a� en Lad u0 'a � Lgnd _:�.® sai.Ao6.a�ea,. v °.;sa d. C L 0e4 d L jgncl iw�s pup o L Lgnd; P6'uo iRa Boa �r�o 6 � a,A � uo L eanpa °sat L �o�� as in Aas ,>a SD Eq L LADPz.,.aa LS2�0 `` sa L L Lae': 6.0 Lddoi s : L e� as poo4j.vgN6 i au, ° •LT? Ljuap j saJ: SadS4 'PaKLw ie,iUap`csaa`;:, L'Lwpj oaaw .:ao aa.ay� :`.LeL�uapl�a,� t� tWP�• oM LV L�.yap L sa,Al' RL.11u. a L6U s apn Lau L"Seua sash ua�xa;�ue':uo�ooL`L�aL'' � Ase peado.e*:uawdoLana6 46, U,e Id Le�taua0a114 poAap,pue �Oo 'Saj:)p OqZ 4o '. ti ta�si pue cL.�v 06a a6. sdeu;tuoPo''utas deu s SuopUPI :UQ[ �43saq . s43aroad .L L-ews :Aojisanbaj uodn Pa L yo yM vb W o A .S'. a;Dtl0 La Bu LMo L L0.4 ay4. �.o,, 6u L ._, y+{ � j` Pea L nbab -q's 1Suoo jgiawdc�Lanop': jo up Id . ��:Aaua6 �('' { . � .. UoLjewaabul •LL3unua.p6PlILII'`a.u4 Rq pahnba'A a suoLgLpr>loa� Bons .g4l.m '6uoLe s4uowaapbaa'6ufuoz aye''uL. papn'(au act -Livgs pp4,4twgns uo ��w.Ao�uL ayl; rl' '_` �. asodAnd 3 uoLssLwwo':) 6t�'L sue g d a, pa lwgn s gq • o� ` s r We Ld R `�astq aq Rein 6u tuoz :'q3'`M uodn uaw,>', up L �00 LOAa'p �p `due d`. L r auaCa ail s L : s yi c � . uawdo lama ` Apu zw :a m � F. i, f -(� v� .: c t k � +I ''F? Q .. r ~ a a _'.�• s s•`F''y" r= - 3at pan C©mp� og�entp7 F P n� d j r es fi3, r i �R{f� ,^fin�.S y a q R0P]a y Mites 1 '.d lVn `.Yo 7 f 1 n ° the>; st` �►lponen "f c � nsity ' ©r f a.ndar�s #Q "'sh 1..� co;ntaa -` ot. utur the var�Qus. poP,:u7at7on,dens:it e 'oSrtte tp°Pnla�on= characteo�tdcs an Yr. and h� commdn t 1 aid uses �� Fie ' ener`al R `corre.l'at —t- _ d;e 7rtCTudin.g estz•r,�at: �n not h�aa� of Dorve16" the 0 lier{Cats. 9e �ti,th'� h.� -Te e 7 �� d The'; sli ponent:s e# t o `�' ° ara, } ?7a apUS- tO_ dwej l i.n i lip ng data_ res1aenti'ai 9 �:hauszn sha: ; k. .gh var�o+as usQs,rproposed:.6 units,; per ac;nd 7r t :e, t,.^at non .resicl and s4tare .:; fU" to '.ca C Iate, i. nt�ial tac7 fge ao �> I° �rater cohsum,<. trAff!C., goner 'c,ion. g` 7es j n luda � p, � tti, eked.. P ion wse.ura ar 9 Svft-�3Pp uti] i ties gE.'ne0d:s ;`and ; P kings ��di m W er t ' oil is a6d=:'scrvIc Y the Ciecess r� ntc or private or. q m t'rad� ikon n,aPac�- - as �s �ro3ected ganlza't.ions f �: aii. Arend' .1. cif f �Or the or a Fred �� c mpleted p� �P��P r dati'on Or gvjr . ,: ed e�'e,T o a z e., ubd:v sio D :} x r= pmen� }}�. n i gn � Compone` t Y �• t :! y n K f y Sid f f f _ cript7 on., ] desert.Su,bdiv7s'1 ° Pt; ve ;s,tatement n De-' 19nt.'Com %t s6 b� iv�s,i n Off' ;the,:; Ponent sF =.land- uses;. of land; inciu n I F s°Ihcip7es; �a7.g ccrr a:F . a This 9 1ot'des �QV.ernt r9-.the 'Co l 9►� . fog pr'e { tia ; - i t _can .se pbnent 'shad 1 , `✓e:rious., p,?�e€i do rve. �s -the b'` an:.<suF Prepc�se�� . Y, Sit' Plan to the b SIs'`,or:°`de 'er �c P'pt `detai i sd . - _ Gener4I patio m�nirrg :tha:_co of fleve!s�pmen nforri �, ''r •r':< n : eryices an& C"'98`., 'M1 es�rV ra f'iies rC'omponer�t x Anon L ..:' icesM 9 f ' or .maps;Sptt`7 s ar�ci=Fac7�i.'a y'"arid 9 .farth s t,CQ �dnn tic �1�, r�xist�n the-`ger1eraa Pon' sh y d'a�na'ge.�water'suppi 9 a��d;proposed 1oeatibh and n :a, local, �" andrdi5tribuf;iStams`.for. eutei� ijao Ui]7ti@S. ' re sf':-r r sAran and die-P al �ana�per�.nces arghis afi.. necess k wayp `easem r:s = Pr'inci des Y theregor fry P7es `and-.s f� Pttive,sta pment : 5 Ci as .a detaiied andards used for., s��n90 c�mPonen t , etr�od statement: is forth uF',iec; aj 0PprationPserhin the, mulati4n, �s �'veS„ ndL x tie 3 ty, 9 ?ra =ma i ri�t nance ,1� Proposed a�ine� e t� �•. y� +. Co i a-,,-r'� Qh r t, c _seYst c;.. an, F ruction Qrd rr 1 elsC L �'� ° mp o ne n t '�ptior� A.(10 map car. f C.onstr uc of onstrpd s'ettng. forl�h"; Order Com „t A P,non 3 o ti if) = re3 t 3 Propose c $rhai L ehar-,ruct' on. �. 7l1c� .�aCil- p � �" , hrlDno.10 Ca n d. e.a q�sird,her ®firth. :vardou,. ryroP se us o? Aifln d b. ean. see vic -:-an tari r aces `a�,d ;Said Component, es end ''ace?ts. �1u,�e c �,�, UtzIit sha71 u's &: shah, s Me Y i^elease Pacify the nci"ude, est i e t'eUres or`-�ohr 'author? tproPosed order' o f,matem t the; _ so : as to y to 'occ re ' relate p.rav�^de a 'basispY cr�mpieeuest for ` cPstucton servaces acid for, phase° fac�1 a d� ermIr�iri t �: _ �� ,s for each Se 9 he equarcy AdA 1, t i C61h P one n p o n Ge'n' a n f eral pl,, 4 0 De JS4 add.i t y�?-J,-666, - " ' , -�,, . "-. . I , , T On C6 , 4', _;,, . M, .1; ent,.�� ViiE 71, .1 MPOnent'� may-.. inc d.i'n' - C a .,Re e 9 Omppnent n,..,. - 1creatio iC.` p.rCbnsi atod h 16, f. 1 f- pub] p r oy. I f 'd :S',1'rra`tjVe.� acid 1 n -OmPonent, PC). h, _j on f o r zdm 1 MIC s ety Pra q rt e r s .and t fnarar� 'of r I pos Joe 'd Ae p such � t be CC)m a t I P U 1 r 0 e V�.n t lap PP eport"��F`; vs ! r D e s c ipt on,.,; ..Th6 k r SU enf. P Pportin an 'of;'D 9,� maps drawn, to,eve] r anati 6-1.'' s-.,,. -OPment-shal,7 inc e0orts' and-e d: r cal xp I agrams ude f art n 0 Cre MO, tb od s,"6 -Scriptians, t t 4 F I ': i � Inal s f Q V, I a t i ".,i, -IOPment Plan Final 'd ument:,, z approy d'. onj ng e .Puy pose�- . 'To .1 Aq Inc rPorat' _Tt� e,'a I i.c M 0 re u,i red f I .. � k,, :p, - , 11 1� : . _ PJ a il "L� - _� - , i ' T, , . a t i o n s,_' d '" - n o rm a t i 0 , - , - 'i, �, . .'' . - �Cbndj tj n a n ons. ""Al I ous- Ylt,ub' Re 'I qu7i red - Previ dramended ml tted, i nfo'�_'mation mOdifle an n e d a M e , d" dT. a Final.-. required,,;_ ,, ai I ed -� ''T"i -,i'& d e t' ra S nd i�:, which', _w ng �May be J'n o r mation Y-for, first e'. a* YTT -Stage f! d evel.on re pmen Pproved- N W t - Additional Owl ng lona7 0 squired sFialT i:iciuc+e the a Prre I oM I n, a,,y - plat Iat -,I nWth'the SubdIN.1 S Ion acc ocmci Pradnaen nand"aI icaSubdvISIOWb1 provisionOf ctte he :0rd.jnanbFina d ce. sp11n9s and 4 5-at 6ns Q , 4 p r .0 v I S Ion con ,venantsn spec f'cat10nsrequired Ina 4pprpval or Fsite ans- nc I and s c a p I p g'.- p a,n. ding de',spertaTiled land E ng i.nee r 'Ing:'PlanS and e r,"I :specifications. nf orm6 t i b" -malp 'b e re o by Village I _n as quired Note-: h e .above n t - rma fo .7 o n,: t h a 1.7, b e D 'c 0 M P i SuPP]ied"bY`�the V '4 a - per j-m i -Said information rWf.`, be modi age;. f o r 1,,,requ to 'ap, eva, 'u an n '01 M u Proved-ien-ts P011,1-an 1, 6-�,'t h 6 ire I a lon",of� the` Xomm �th t" ,, �j e prQposebd�.'p-r�ojoc.t 'Sca7,eo.-,:jand,, "'On b a S ed. ;';�'S(16h COMP16xify G.f ng-Ahe ermjhati6` etchi.Plan" D ve 10 s ta. e 0 r_ n-may be made fDllbw- t ` Preliminary --p I stage to' Prior,, e 71 JORDSKO LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 639MELODYLANE NAPERVILLE, ILLINOIS 60540/ 312-357-0011 April 26, 1973 Nor. Adolph Tessness Clerk -Administrator Village of Chanhassen P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Nordskov of Chanhassen P.U.D. Dear Adolph: First let me say that I believe that should you leave the Village Clerk's.job, Chanhassen will lose a very great asset. One which will be difficult to replace. It has been a pleasure to work with you despite our frustrations regarding our zoning. You will be missed. I am enclosing several letters which I have written to clarify our application and get us back on the right path. We have all devoted too much time and money to this project to allow it to fail. I would like to comment on your system for having us pay Mr. Dale. He should at least give us the benefit of his comments before any public meeting so we can have our answers ready. No where in your ordinance does it provide for our paying him. I do not object, but our Attorney does so could you please send me a copy of that ordinance provision. He claims that this is reasonable only for building permits, Engineering, etc., we are a Corporation and must account for every dollar we spend. I authorized payment, but it has been questioned. Would you please do me one more favor before you leave the Village? On Monday, May 7th I will be in Minneapolis to meet with our Planner (John Voss of Urban Planning) and would appreciate your meeting with Carl Dale, John, and.me to review the requirements for our zoning. Would you also tell me -when does zoning actually occur? I am going to ask John Neveaux to hire you as a consultant for the Planning Commission until all pending zoning you have been following has been cleared up. I hope you will not mind, but this would help the Village and all Developers you have worked with. Sincerely, _erely, Daniel �+1. Adams Enclosures (3) ccI K.O. Becker William Dilworth, President, Nordskov JORDSKO LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 639 MELODY LANE/ NAPE RV I L L E, ILL I NO IS 60540 / 312-357-0011 January 18, 1973 Mr. Adolph Tessness Clerk Administrator Village of Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota Re: Dear Mr. Tessness: JAN RECEIVED VILLAGE OF CHANHASSEN, MINN. R Preliminary Development Plan "Nordskov" Under separate cover I am sending copies of the exhibits we intend to present to the Planning Commission for approval on February 13, 1973• Please review them as soon as you can. Enclosed with this letter is a copy of the written part of this application. This explains what each display is as well as all of our plans. It is, I believe, everything we have discussed in the past year and is an even better plan then we started with. I would appreciate it if you would peruse this application. view the exhibits, and discuss them with Mr. Dale (he too has a set) so that we can all agree as to what will be presented. Perhaps Mr. Neveaux should also have a preview so that he too knows what to expect. This letter is also a thank you to you and Mr. Neveaux for your cooperation and help with our problems. I sincerely believe that between us we can make this area an example for other developers and that we will all be very proud of our contributions to that end. In view of our previous discussion and communications please note the following specific omissions and let me know as soon as possible if this is satisfactory. 1. Roads to be constructed in each phase are no longer indicated. Only public and private roads are shown. January 18, 1973 Mr. Adolph Tessness Page 2 2. Recreation facilities are not specifically indicated only that we will have them. 3. The over all plan does not specifically fall into any zoning area of your ordinance, but since Mr. Dale asks for all 240 acres and we are closest to P-2 in concept, that is what I indicate. Deviations will be required. 4. All population densities, and land use intensities are related to the entire parcel. Specifically, we indicates 1. 6.58 units per acre 2. 10% land coverage with buildings 3. 13% Open land, park & green trail 4. 12% Recreational land 5. 9 % Roads 6. Our Townhouse area shown in the previous plan is approximately 3.5 units/acre. 7. 27% Commercial Looking forward to hearing from you and hoping that this letter finds--you-recovering-even more -rapidly. Your truly, Daniel W. Adams Enclosures$ 3 P.S. The plan marked "Village Hall" is our suggestion for your planned expansion. We would like very much to do the Architecture for it. DWA$mea .r �� ' `0 ` %S KOV LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION J01 LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 639 MELODY LANE / NAPE RV I L L E, ILL I NO I S 60540 / 312-357-0011 April 10, 1972 Mr. Adolph Tessness Clerk -Administrator Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Mr. Tessnesst Would you please place us on the agenda for the Planning Commission for April 25, 1972. We will be requesting planned unit zoning on approximately 80 acres of the Lyman farm. Thank you, Daniel W. Adams Vice -President DWA s m ea J OR DS LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 639MELODY LANE NAPERVILLE, ILLINOIS60540 312-357-0011 March 31, 1972 Mr. Adolph Tessness Clerk - Administrator Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Mr. Tessnesss Thank you very much for meeting with me on Saturday, I appreciate it very much. During our conversation I asked for some copies of your new Village map (4 color) and requested their use in a pamphlet we are publishing and sending to our new shareholders. Would it be possible to buy 300 additional copies of this map? I will need them as soon as possible. In addition, I would appreciate a copy of your newest soil map, several copies of your new pamphlet, and a copy of your new zoning ordinance. We are preparing a study of the Historical Site plan, but I believe the Village should be involved and your Historical Society. Would you please have them write to me at the above address? Thank you very much in advance for all of your cooperation and help in our coming development. Sincerely yours, Daniel W. Adams Vice President DWA smea J01 LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 639 MELODY LANE/ NAPE RVILLE, ILL I NOIS60540/ 312-357-0011 February 25, 1972 Mr Adolph Tessness Village of Chanhassen P.O. Box 14.7 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Lyman farm zoning petition. Dear Mr. Tessness: I am writing to inform you of our progress and plans for zoning petition to the plan commission. Our progress has been quite substantial, but one snag we have had is the Lake Ann property. Just prior to our last date we were told by Mr. Lindahl that he would accept our offer on his property. We suspended our plans based on this news and pro- ceeded to negotiate for purchase. He changed his mind and raised the price to an unacceptable limit and was rejected. We again proceeded on our plans. Now he has lowered his price and we are once again close to agreement. We believe this would be an asset to us all. I realize this has been quite confusing for you and we do sincerely appreciate your patience. I assure you we are in the process of our plans and will be ready shortly with a present- ation for you, preliminary to our actual plan Commission meeting. Presently I plan to be in Chanhassen this next weekend and will bring our preliminary plans for your consideration and comments. In our past conversations you have always admonished me to not be too hasty in the presentation. I know you are absolutely right and would ask you to once again not schedule us on;the plan commission meeting but rather to wait until you see our plans and we have adjusted them to the most desirable arrange- ment for all concerned. Since no construction can begin until sewers are available, we know it is better to be sure than premature. I believe you will like what you see and would again reassure you that all of the plans I outlined are becoming a reality in picture on our site plan. I am looking forward to seeing you in the very near future. DWA:mea Sincerely, Daniel W. Adams Vice President IORDSK��.\DLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORA T ION 639MELODY LANE/ NAPE RVILLE, ILL INOIS60540/ 312-357-0011 April 27, 1973 Mr. Carl Dale Design Planning Associates, Inc. 4826 Chicago Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417 Res Nordskov of Chanhassen P.U.D. Dear Mr. Dale: Your letter of March 21st, and your comments at our meeting prior to that indicate tome that we have a communication's gap of some magnitude. Perhaps what our "starting over" should mean is to review what has been done to date. 1. Prior to any presentation to the Village Officials, we did research, together with Real Estate Research Corp- oration and M.A.I.'s skilled in marketing and requirements F in the entire Minneapolis Metropolitan Area. Both agreed with our site selection and projected uses for our land. 2. We next interviewed Architects, Land Planners, and Civil Engineers from the Minneapolis area, as well as from our own area, and after careful analysis of their qualifications and our thoughts relative to development, we selected Mr. Bruce Patterson of Minnesota Valley Surveyors & Engineers, a Civil Engineer and Land Planner, from Burnsville, Minnesota, as our planning consultant, Civil Engineer, and Surveyor. We selected Mr. George Lindstrom, A.I.A., of Carol Stream, Illinois as our Land Planner and Architect. A resume of his qualifications is attached, together with a copy of the letter regarding his original assignment. Minnesota Valley Surveyors and Engineers prepared a 2 ft. topographic survey and a plan for our 80 acre site. The preliminary plans were so similar that we felt quite con- fident in our approach. Mr. Lindstrom then prepared our necessary plans for presentation to the Village for sketch plan approval. Mr. Carl Dale April 27, 1973 Page 2 .3. In May, 1972, Mr. Lindstrom presented our plan. It was accepted by a 6 to 1 vote for concept. Density was 10 units per acre which covered only 15% of the land with buildings. The density was discussed, and since it is only one factor of a plan it was approved and we were told to proceed to our next step. However, it was suggested that we: a. Try to work in a 9 hole golf course. b. Buffer the Park to development trans- ition even more than we had. c. Reduce land coverage by increasing building height wherever -possible. The Park Board approved our plan. The City Engineer indicated traffic, sewer, and water were adequately provided for. The Zoning Administrator (Adolph Tessness) had some suggestions which we adopted. We then prepared Phase plans for roads and construction, .sewer and water area layouts, and a development schedule contingent on sewers availability. At this time you were retained by the Village. So many areas of difference exist between your ideas -and what the Village ordinance provides for and what the Village Officials indicate is acceptable, that we should have a review of each of our goals and a coordinated effort to get this application moving. We have retained Mr. John Voss of Urban Planning as a consultant -coordinator to work directly with you and Bruce Patterson and facilitate completion of our zoning. I hope we can meet Monday, May 7th to review proposals and the Village needs. Your letter of March 21, 1973, has certain points I have reviewed with our consultants and wish to comment on: 1. We have retained another local planner, but believe that the way our documents have been presented is professional and Mr. Lindstrom is highly skilled, his record of success attests to this. 2. & 3. This is very confusing because no one can predict what will be done with land owned by others and what changes they will make. If local attitudes are deter- mined by the Planning Commission and Village Officials comments and votes, it would seem that we have complied with both. ' OR Ds KOVLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Mr. Carl Dale April 27, 1973 Page 3 4. The topographic map has been submitted separately. We are having one prepared with the general plan over- layed. This has, not been done by other P.U.D. developers in Chanhassen and has no real value because no building permits are issued without complete drainage and elevations in the areas being built. (Prestige shows no such plan). It has been considered by us and utilized. Some grading; is always necessary and the topography will be changed to accomodate road drainage, etc. Tree destruction and grading will be held to an absolute minimum. 5. This has been done and is clearly indicated in our latest letter outlining our intent. 6. This has been done, is exhibit C and D and is, complete. .suture housing is too far away to be more specific. At this time it can only be anticipated. 7. Are being prepared. 8. Is prepared and being reviewed by our Attorney. 9. Have all been presented in our latest graphics. To further clarify our definition and communications: Density: 2-3 units/acre low 4-7 units/acre low -medium 8-12 units/acre medium 13-17 units/acre medium high over 17 high We have 241.6 acres of land and are asking for 1600 units of residential - 6.6 units per gross acre. We ask for P-2 zoning which is for "High density residential and other uses". Variances requested are only the: 1. Convenience center and one service station adjacent to Route 5 which would be C-1 commercial on 3 acres. 2. Our plans for the North East corner of Route 5 & 117 would best fit a C-3 Commercial Service District. This is 13.5 acres. The land (60 acres) west of County Route 117 we shall reserve for future commercial and/or service as the need arises. Its development is too far away to be specific at this time. �� NORDSKO V LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Mr. Carl Dale April 27, 1973 Page 4 Therefore: 1. We have 181.6 acres east of highway 117. Our gross density is 8.81 units/acre. 2. We intend to develop the easterly 80 acres of this land first. Its gross density is 10 units/acre and its concept has been presented and approved by the Planning Commission. . 3. 'The first Phase (stage) of this is detailed, dimensioned, and shown on our exhibit B. Its gross density is 12.5 units/acre. 4. The Village officials have told us in writing that it is not necessary to show any buldings beyond the 1st Phase. We are only to show areas of future expectation. This we have done in our exhibit A. 5. We believe we are almost ready for our public hearing and would appreciate any help you might give us, to that end. 6. Our zoning permit should be written as per the above. If the Village wishes to include our western acreage in the P.U.D. permit, it should state future commercial - service. We do not anticipate any residential there so our density is less than 6.6 units/acre on our entire tract. A specific allowable number of residential units is essential for financing and future planning. I hope this letter clarifies our goals and plans. Though I represent the owners, I am not our planner. We have established only a concept and Mr. Lindstrom has set this to what I and many others consider to be an excellent plat.. What should be considered was considered and we will all do what is necessary to accomplish our mutual goal. A fine residential area in a beautiful Village that we can be very proud of. Sin erely, Daniel fi. Adams cc: K.O. Becker Adolph Tessness William Dilworth, DWA:mea President Nordskov ,,'I VORDSI \O V LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ` DESIGN PLANNING ASSOCIATES, INC. 4826 Chicago Avenue So. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417 Phone: (612) 822-2106 October 11, 1973 PLANNING REPORT For: Planning Commission Village of Chanhassen, Minnesota By: Carl R. Dale, AIP Planning Consultant Subject: Planning Review - Revised PUD Plan for Nordskov Development Planning Considerations 1. This matter has been before the Planning Commission at numerous previous meetings. While prior plans were con- sidered to be, as a broad "concept", in general conformity to the Comprehensive Village Plan -they were not considered adequate or compseteenough for any type of "final" approval. At the suggestion of Village Officials and staff, the Nordskov Land Development Company has retained the services of a local planning consultant to assist in developing more complete and revised plans for submission to the Planning Commission. 2. Earlier plans for the approximately 175 acres of land located east of County Road 117 and north of State Highway No. 5 were considered.deficient in several respects: a) Lack of evidence to indicate relationship to_total, area -wide, planning and development considerations. b) Some rather obvious deficiencies in traffic circulation. c) Inadequate explanation and justification for proposed densities. d) Lack of clarity and purpose. e) Potential for "strip" commercial development. f) Probable conflicts between site plans and topography. g) Various others in varying degrees of importance. 3. Greatly revised and considerably improved plans have been submitted fo.r.review by the Planning Consultant. At his option, the applicant has apparently requested the following: a) Concept approval for the -entire 1.75 acres. b) PUD zoning for the easterly 80 acres. c) Final development plan approval for the first phase of construction which occupies the southwest corner of the 80 acre tract and planned for 168 condominium units. 4. Regardless of how good the plans may be, it seems rather doubtful that the Planning Commission could consider and approve all of the above in one meeting for several reasons. a) Time is needed for the Commission members to review, absorb the information, and come to a final decision. Further, plan amendments may or may not be required. b) Adequate time for staff response and recommendations is needed to include all requirements and conditions. to the "PUD Permit" (Zoning Contract). c) Local ordinances require that "final" plan approval be based upon an acceptable time schedule for installation of sanitary sewer. 5: New plans .include considerably more in-depth analysis of the site and area. Such analysis includes topography, soils, vegetation, location, transportation, drainage, and the like. Such analysis has resulted in the developer deferring plans for the western portion at this time as was recommended by the Planning Commission some months ago. At this time, general development plans include only that part of the tract which is located east of County Road 117. This is due primarily to the uncertainty of future.north-south road alignments in this western area. 6. Major changes in the plan include the following: a) The consideration of a possible "strip" commercial development has been eliminated; this is a very positive plan feature. b) The vehicular circulation system has been substantially modified to respect topography and recognize potential alternate alignments for Highway No. 41; also, a service drive along Highway No. 5 is indicated in recognition of future up -grading to limited access standards: c) As part of an ecology study, the new plan recognizes the park and recreational needs that may differ through- out the development depending upon needs generated by, various population components in differing housing types. The previously proposed golf course area has been dropped from the plan. 7. Statistical comparisons between the current plan and the previous plan are difficult due to the size and complexity of the project and the elimination of any specific land use proposals for the western portion of the total area. It would seem however, that dwelling unit density proposals have not been significantly altered; only the arrangement of on the ground has been changed. Proposed densities and land use acreage by type is as indicated in the applicants descriptive brochure: Over-all density still seems rather high and this results from portions of the plan which call for a "high density site plan of twenty (20) units per acre. It is suggested that the applicant explain the .nature and purpose of the high density areas. 8. Stage No. 1 or the first phase of construction (168 con- dominium units on 12 acres with a density of 14 units per acre) is essentially the same as originally proposed although the site plan has been altered substantially. The new plan seems improved and this density can be tolorated for this type of housing unit. A fully dimensioned site plan, however, should be required for further analysis. 9. The -re are still, a number of questions as'noted in previous planning reports -especially the Planning Consultants report dated November 8, 1972. Some questions still remaining are: a) Traffic impact on the site and general area. b) Staging.of public improvements (utilities, streets, - etc.) in relation to private development. 0 Plans for an over-all pedestrian or other trail system. d) Advisability of park land dedication vs. retention under a homeowners association. e) Engineering analysis of utility plans, capacity, and staging of construction. f) Method of calculating land use acreage and density proposals. 10, As noted in earlier planning reports, the plan as a "general concept" seems to have merit and would be in general con- formity to the Comprehensive Village Plan. Final approval, however, should contingent upon several conditions as noted in the Planning Report dated November 8, 1972 and the rough draft of a PUD Permit presented earlier. Recommendation a) The plan should be thoroughly explained to the Commission at the meeting. The applicant should be questioned by the Commission members regarding any aspects of the plan which b) c) d) are still not clear or fully understood. The applicant should be informed of any additional data or information that should be submitted. Reports should be requested from all Village departments and others who make suggestions and/or recommendations. This matter should be tabled until a later meeting to allow time for the following: -Submission of additional information by the applicant as may be requested; this should include at least the following: Fully dimenstioned site plan for phase No. 1 construction,. summary tabulation and clear explanation of proposed land uses -and dwelling unit densities, and information relating to the nature of proposed "high" density housing areas. -Submission and review of analysis and recommendation reports from Village staff, consultants, and others as applicable. -An opinion from the Village Attorney as to just what can be approved at this time in the light of sanitary sewer availability. -Re-draft of the PUD Permit with revisions as necessary based upon input from the above. -Establishment of a time -table or administrative procedure program for future public action on the PUD plan proposal. General Conclusion The revised plan has been considerably improved and seems acceptable as a general concept proposal which is in general conformity to the Comiprehensive Village Plan. Some questions still remain unresolved, however, and public approval of this project should be based upon the consideration noted above. Mr. Dan Adams or 639- Melody Lai Naperville, 1: SUBJECT: You] Dear Dan: Referring to your'letter c ted April 6, 1973 and your comments per- to for consulting fees in taining Lo the statements .,at we se ' you development. Section 24.09 revie�,Ung your plans on th ordslc Subtitl6d Fes, tree lows: - 1.. A miniof ti25.00 to be paid upon the filing of the apon f amendment. A11 di pens of the ��Cj Village incurredor expended by it pro ssing of the zoning amendment application, ineludition, mailing, legal and engineering costs. Also, Section 6 of the Platting Ordinance No. 33, in part reads as tollowsa Village expense incurred in employing the services of the Village Engineer, Village Attorney, and other professional consultants in connection with the review of said plat shhll be reimbursed to the Village by the subdivider. A copy of our Zoning Ordinance and. our Platting.'and Subdivision Ordinance are being sent to you at this time to that you can review both Ordinances in detail. Page 2 In answer to your question pertaining to when does Zoning actually occur, your preliminary plans in detail must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator. At that time if all details are available, the Planning Commission will set the date for a Public Hearing. After the Public Hearing the Planning Commission makes their recommendation to the Village Council. The Village Council mays 1. Approve the preliminary development plan and the application for rezoning 2. Disapprove the preliminary developmmnt plan and application for rezoning stating reasons for the disap roval, or 2. Approve the preliminary development plan � application for rezoning subject to speeified;.modifications and conditions. I This \. Thy statement is in Ordinance No. 47, Seet art-34:, Subsection 4e, At that . timm you then proceed onto final development p<�:C'"in subject to the specified conditions that were ::::ely %yrsop the preliminary plan. Si ATakjs Enclosures rPessness c nistrator 5 .*N SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION HEETING OCTOBER 17, 1973 The meeting was called to order by Chairman John Neveaux. The following members were present: Dan Herbst, Tom Gabbert, Jim Mielke, John Neveaux, Arnie Ryba, and Nick Waritz. Tim Stone was absent. NORDSKOV: Mr. Stelios Aslanidis, Midwest Planning and Research, Inc., ban Adams, and Ken Becker were present. They Chairman explained the history of Lake Ann Interceptor Phase 2. A letter was received from the Metro Council dated August 23, 1973, that the time table for construction of the interceptor has been moved up two years for completion in 1977. At the October 15 Council meeting the Council felt that the availability of sewer is beyond the reach of imminency. The Chairman read the October 15 Village Council minutes. Mr. Aslanidis gave the presentation. The proposed plan shows a 75 foot set back from State Highway 5. The first 30 acres is divided into five phases. I. Condomiums 2. Condomiums 3. Townhouses 4. Four - 6-story apartment buildings 5. Office and convenience center The condomiums are considered medium density of 14 units per acre, townhouses low density of 5 units per acre, and apartments high density of 20 units per acre. Each phase has separate recreational facilities. Carl Dale gave a review of the proposed plan. This review dated October 11, 1973, is attached to these minutes. Planning Commission members were polled as to the concept. Dan Herbst - Would like more time to study the plan and planners report. The plan is an improvement. The Village will need professional help on the traffic impact in the area. Tom Gabbert - rood use for the A'and. Should hire a traffic consultant. Jim Mielke - The Village has not determined what use should be on the land to the east. Need reports from other commissions of the Village. John Neveaux - Mould like the Park and Recreation Commission to look at this plan amd cpment. Arnie Ryba - This is the right place for this development. The Village should make up its mind about the property to the east. Nick Waritz - Density is high. Has reservations regarding the two commercial areas. The Administrator stated he felt the Council does not want to see high density development in Chanhassen. The Chairman suggested that the high density (20 units per acre) and medium density'(14 units per acre) be lowered. A motion was made by Jim Mielke and seconded by Tom Gabbert to table any action at this time until the Planning Commission has an imput from the Park and Recreation Commission on dedication of the northern area and comments on khft their plans for the eastern property also following the Village meeting with the Metro Sewer Board in December. After much discussion the motion and second were withdrawn. A motion was made by Jim Mlelke and seconded by Arnie Ryba to table any action on this proposal until the November 14 Planning Commission meeting at which time the Planning Commission will discuss this plan after imput from the Park and Recreation Commission. Piotion unanimously approved. .k AB & B Associates Inc. 639 Melody Lane Naperville, Illinois 60540 (312) 357-4373 October 20, 1973 llir. John Neveaux Chairman Planning Commission Village of Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota Re: Planning Commission special meeting and remarks relating to Nordskov of Chanhassen zoning application. Dear Mr. Neveaux: First, thank you and the Planning Commission members very much for your time and comments regarding our project. As you saw, we did all you asked or suggested and more. Our local Consultant is one of the largest land planners in the Twin -Cities area and has done many P.U.D. plans thruout the country. Nor. Aslanidis is their Chief Planner and has personally super- vised all of the work we presented to the Village. Before we retained Midwest Planning we interviewed other local Planners recommended by Carl Dale. Each Planner liked our ideas, our quality, and our land. Every one of them defined our density as LOW MEDIUM. Chanhassen zoning ordinance ;�47 defines the P-2 zoning objective as precisely what we want to do and sets its location in our area of the Village Master Plan. Section 15:01 states "to provide a district appropriate for high density residential uses and office buildings,_ _ _ ". All of our contacts with the Village have been_ to facilitate the development of our concept which to us is an ideal we sincerely believe in and are determined to see as a reality. We have complied with every request made by the Village either thru the Planning Commission or Zoning Administrator and worked as closely as possible with your Commission. In our -- Consulting Engineers mm Mr. John Neveaux October 20, 1973 Page 2 very first presentation, Mr. Lindstrom was well received and only one Commission member was concerned about the density. Concept approval was voted at 10.7 units per acre ,on the 80 acres and only a few changes were requested. We worked with Adolph in accordance with your ordinance and when we had his approval, we again appeared before the Commission. Your City Engineer, your Planner, and your Park Board had all reported and agreed that our plan was feasible, possible, and advantageous to the Village. To our knowledge, not one department head registered even one complaint. Carl Dale now become your Planner, requested additional time for review and he subsequently presented a negative report asking that we show more of our plans for the balance of the land as well as many details which are not actually a part of your zoning ordinance. I met with Carl but he told me that since I was not a planner, our communication would be difficult. He said he would prefer to work with a local planner even though MIr. Lindstrom is experienced and, with demonstrated results, is by all standards an excellent Architect and Land Planner. I discussed this change with Mr. Lindstrom and he agreed to allow us to break our contract with him and agreed to work very closely with any Planner we might retain in the Twin Cities area. Midwest Planning has the best reputation of any planner I know of in the area, they are also the most expensive. I have asked Rlidwest Planning to answer Mir. Dale's review point by point, however, Items 7,8, and 9 are not applicable to the concept approval or preliminary development plan. Pdlidwest reviewed your ordinance and, with Carl Dale's suggestions and George Lindstrom's councel,prepared what they and we believe to be an excellent, clearly defined, well prepared brochure which considers every item that a good plan must. A brief outline of that plan ist AB A B Associates Inc. Mr. John Neveaux October 20, 1973 Page 3 1. Density based on land area exclusive of County and State roads and all commercial land is 10 units per acre. 2. Though each area can be a separate entity, they are tied together with a green belt of open park land. Access to this green area is self evident. Open, green land is over 50% of the total acreage, and only 13% of the land is covered by buildings. 3. Roads are clearly defined and Phase I is defined beyond any requirement even to include a final development plan with sewers, water, and landscaping. What real difference does an area of buildings make as to density in and of itself? The whole idea of P.U.D. zoning is to allow clusters of buildings so open spaces can be retained. No P.U.D. plan that I have seen presented anywhere has separated areas as to density. Sewers and water are already in Chanhassen and, according to your Engineer, are of sufficient size to satisfy our development as well as any others in the North- east area of the Village. We have checked availability of telephone and electricity and both are in adequate supply. All "recommendations" in Carl Dale's letter have been met and zoning ordinance complied with. Since we had a local Planner and he met with Mr. Dale , (6 hours of con- sultation) it seems to me all of these new questions could have been asked and clarified for our meeting. The State Highway department was consulted and approved all of our traffic proposals. No one can answer every problem that might arise, but we all know that roads are built after the traffic is generated, not in anticipa- tion of it. 4. Our Environmentalist Consultant concluded his report with "The Nordskov Development project, if managed with the spirit of the proceeding recommendations, will provide a saner, more livable, (even joyous) living space than now exists on the land in that place."* * We have utilized almost every recommendation made. AB & B Associates Inc. 31�:r. John Neveaux October 20, 1973 Page 4 We are petitioning you and the Village of Chanhassen for: 1. Concept approval of a high quality medium (10 unit per acre) density Planned Unit Development on 175 acres of land, 80 acres of which are shown conceptually. 2. The general concept of this development is defined in graphics 10 and 11 of our brochure. Phasing by area is also included therein. 3. The first phase of construction is shown in graphics 12, 13, 14, and 15. Our buildings will be of the quality shown in graphic 16 and 17 and on the drawings and plans submitted at the meeting. These will be more clearly defined prior to development of each phase. P:r. Neveaux, we have spent over $200,000 in Chanhassen because we believed its progressive advertising, beauty of land, quality of life, and future are all complimentary to our concept of development and ideals for planned unit living. ;bJe have committed over $1,000,000 in the Village because of our reception, Village encouragement, and the belief that what we all want for the Village is orderly, quality, well planned, growth. We ask you, as Chairman, of the Planning Commission to help facilitate the approval of our application. We believe it will be an asset to the Village and that to delay it any longer serves no purpose. Pressure on the Metro Board can only be exerted when the Village can demon- strate its need in terms of commerce, and land owners willing and able to develop their land. Whatever T can do to help attain this goal shall be done. Sinc GC - r- Daniel t'J. Adams Vice President cc: S. Aslanidis K.O. Becker C. Dale W. Dilworth DWA : mea AB G. Lindstrom R. Berry J. Keys Ivir. Piros A. Greene AB A B Associates Inc. AB & B Associates Inc. 639 Melody Lane Naperville, Illinois 60540 (312) 357-4373 NORDSKOV Or CHANHASSEN P.U.D. VILLAGE OF CHANHASSEN Density and what it means. We have 175.4 acres of land in this Application. Density after Phase I (168) is .959/acre Density after Phase II (240) is 2.33/acre Density after Phase III (97) is 2.88/acre Density after Phase IV (240) is 4.25/acre Density after Phase V (0) is 4.25/acre Density after maximum'total development is 9.22/acre Density excluding Commercial area and roads 10/acre As you can see we do not exceed R-1 until 1977- Tt,Ie do not exceed low density until 1980 and we never exceed medium density. Daniel W. Adams DIVA s mea AB T" Consulting Engineers n � ! �`��.`` "�'�� • � 4 err' - ��, �r � �. �.-�; � t i - � �� p�it�y.• );��- \ � � � . iL r• 4 �pf..t� � b iyr(� �4��[�/ ��''�`�6 sn �Y�"a\ � tit.. �',� _ a � � r Ift v� ;! v Z ID CD L'g t r �13 ru• j ._ r r+ A� _ r1 REGULAR PLA14NING COIU41SSION MEETING OCTOBER 24, 1973 The meeting was called to order by Chairman John Neveaux. The following members wc•:re present: Tim Stone, Arnie Ryba, Nick waritz, Dan Herbst, Jim Mielke, and John Neveaux. Tom Gabbert was absent. MINUTES: A motion was made by Dan Herbst and seconded by Jim M.alke to approve the October 10, 1973, regular Planning Commission minutes. Motion unanimously approved. The second pars?,graph under ITORDSKOV in the October 17, 1973, special Planning Commission minutes to read: The Chairman explained the history of La.%e Ann Interceptor Phase 2. A letter was received from the Metro Cov,ncil dated August 23, 1973, that the time table for construction of the interceptor has been moved up two years for completion .n 1977. At the October 15 Cor.ncil meeting the Council felt that the availability of sewer is beyond the reach of imminency. The Counci.'. feels that the developer thereby may not proceed beyond the sketcl, plan stage and the Village will not give any approval beyond th,j sketch plan stage. The Chairman read the October 15 Village Council minutes. The thijd paragraph under NORDSKOV in the October 17, 1973, special Planninj Commission minutes to read: Mr. Aslanidis gave the presentation The proposed plan shows a 75 foot set back from State Higbway 5. The fi,:st 80 acres is divided into five phases. 1. Condominiums 2. Condominiums Townhouses 4. Four - 6--story apartment buildings ►,. Office and convenience center The condominiums are considered medium density of 14 units per acre, tovnhouses low density of 5 units per acre, and apartments high density oa 20 units per acre. Each phase has separate recreational facilities. P motion was made by Dan Herbst and seconded by Jim Mielke to approve :he October 17, 1973, special Planning Commission minutes as amended. 'lotion unanimously approved. . HAROLD HESSE: Herb Baldwin, Planner, and Harold Hesse were present to request variances to Sections 2.01 and 2.02 of Ordinance 45. The July report and map from Don Berg, Soil Conservationist, were discussed. The Chairman stated that the Village Engineer indicated that the types of problems listed by Don Berg are not that bad. The Administrator explained that deed restrictions could be placed on the lots so they could not be subdivided until sewer and water are available also plans could be drawn showing where the house, septic tank, well, and drainfield could be placed on each lot. Herb Baldwin suggested they could modify lots to give more building space also the developer could suggest possible building sites and placement of drainfields , septic tanks, and well.. The proposed plat has five acre lots on 350 acres. Dan Herbst suggested the developer consider just phases 1 and 2 at this point. \ r� �r CILMESSEN VILLAGE 7610 LAREDO DRIVE • P. O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 • (612) 474-8885 DATE: October 29, 1974 FROM: Lloyd G. Schnelle, City Administrator TO: Mr. Dan Adams NORDSKOV Land Development Corp. 639 Melody Lane Naperville, Illinois 60504 SUBJ: Submission of statement and establishing escrow fund. ENCL: (1) City Statement 1. Enclosure (1) is a complete itemized statement showing a complete breakdown of your bill with the City. 2. It is further requested that additional funds of $1,000.00 be established in your escrow account. ly C}sty Administrator LGS:k Chanhassen, Minn., October 25, 974 9 M Nordskov PUD 2 IN ACCOUNT WITH CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECAP: Legal Engineer Planner Publication i City Staff Labor Materials TOTAL EXPENSE Escrow monies paid to date BALANCE DUE as of 10-25-74 372 50 709.50 587.37 10.77 i 214.78 I� 111.40 �I 2,006 32 jll 1 2210 M 781 32 n � r Zt 1 7610 LAREDO DRIVE o P: O. 30X 147 © CHAN ASSZ-N,' MINNES07A 5.5317 mnRncvnv EXPENSES INCURRED REGARDING NORDSKOV PUD 2 ESCROW FEE PAID 4-1-74 300.00 �... (612, 474-0835 3-29-74 Russell Larson: Preparation of draft agreement permitting .Nordskov to advancebeyond sketch plan stage. 150.00 4-6-74 " Special Council meeting relative to. Council action on Nordskov release from Council resolution. 50.00 200.00 4-2-74 Russell Larson: Conference with Attorney Penberthy rela- tive to Nordskov agreement and zoning ordinance procedures. 35.00 April, Design Planning: Prepared and sent procedural material to Dan Adams. i hour 30.00 May Design.Planning: meeting with City staff, and developer and Planner A hours 75.00 ESCROW FEE PAID 7-19-74 925.00. 7-10-74 Russell Larson: Attend Planning Commission meeting relativq to request for public 'nearing on zoning, prelim inary plan and proposed development plan 50.00 7-17-74 Preparation of public hearing notice and arrange for publication 35.00 85.00 June Design Planning: Meeting.with City Staff and Nordskov 105.00 " City Staffwand Nordskov PUD plan Procedure 75.00 6-12-74 Review planning Commission agenda 30.00 6-12-74 Prepare for Planning Commission meeting 15.00 Mileage 8.75 6-12-74 Attend.Planning Commission meeting 25.00 253.75 July Design Planning: Prepare report on PUD Plan 45.00 " Prepare for Planning Commission meeting 30.00 Attend Planning Commission meeting 25.00 Report on density standards 22.50 Mileage and xerox copies 8:29 130.79 8-19-74 Chaska Herald Public Nearing publication 10.77 age 2 NORDSKOV u� 6-12:07-5/74 Schoell & Madson Review proposed preliminary Development` plan, and meeting with developer 8-14-74 Russell Larson: Attend Public Hearing and Planning Commission meeting.on proposal August Design Planning: Meet with PUD planner 30.00 Prepare for meeting 30.00 8-14-74 Attend planning Commission meeting 25.00 Xerox copies 3.00 Mileage 4.83 CITY STAFF CHARGES 2-27-74 Lloyd Schnelle 1 hour @ 7.64 meeting 7.64 4-6-74 U " 3 hours @ 7.64 meeting with Council 22.92 513-74 12 hours @ 7.64 meeting 11.64 6-3-74 1 hour @ 7.64 meeting 7.64 7-1-74 6 hours report for planning C meeting 45.84 7-10-74 1 hour - meeting 7.64 9-6-74 H 4 hours - prepare report for Council 30.56 10-25-74 " 12 hours - meeting 11.46 7-1-74 Karen Schneider 8 hours - typing and assembl.ing.report34.72 9-6-74 8 hours -typing & assembling reports 34.72 Xerox copies, 109.00 Folders 2.40 709.50 52.50 92.83 326.18 Part; and Recreation Commission Minutes November 13, 1973 Chanhassen Village Hall The special Park and Recreation Commission meeting was called to order by Chairman Arnold Weimerskirch on November 13, 1973 at 8:00 p.m. in the Village Hall. The following members were present: Arnie Weimerskirch, Dave Wilson, Chuck Hirt, Vivian Beaugrand, Rich Lyman, Bill Engebritson, Denis Stedman. MINUTES: A motion was made by Denis Stedman and seconded by Chuck Hirt to approve the October 16, 1973 minutes. Notion carried. NORDSKOV: bir. Stelios Aslandis gave a presentation of slides on the concept and sketches of the Phase I, 80 acres site located on Highways S and 117. The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the Nordskov sketches against the check list which has been developed for that purpose. 1. Conformance to corridor Park Plan seems adequate. 2. Adherence to flood plain ordinance. The Commission feels there is a possible flooding problem in teighborhood 1. 3. Overall effect seems adequate. 4. Provisions for Neighborhood Playgrounds: a. The clubhouse should be adequate in size for the number.of persons proposed for this area. b. Provisions should be made for tot lots. c. Two ball fields should be provided with easy access to all families in the project. d. Access to Park: Public access should be provided from the road system to the Park land at the North end by a corridor through Neighborhood 3. S. Safety: A traffic study should be made. The Village Attorney should investigate the possibility of the park lands being owned by the Village and maintained by the developer. Resolution: A motion was made by Dave Wilson and seconded by Chuck Hirt for t` Vim age Administrator to draft a resolution in regards to Lake Aiin Phase 11 Interceptor that it not be deferred for two years but construction go on as scheduled to help from polluting Lake Ann. Motion carried. Rich Lyman abstained from voting. This resolution will be acted on at the next Park and Recreation Commission meeting. A motion was made by Denis Stedman and seconded by Dave Wilson to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried. Sharon Loechler Secretary RFGuLAT2 PL. PTz11iiG CO1I1'11SS10PT IMETING 110V;'P• The meeting 1•ras 1I31rRcared to order b 14. 1973 following Members were Y Chairman John 2Teveaux, Stone, and Arnie Ryba. present: John I7eveau�c The Tom Gabbert Were absent. Dan Herbst • Nic1; I7aritz, Tim came later. Jim Iiielke and were present. Mayor Klingelhutz and Councilman 1701f Ii1NUTES: A motion was made b to approve the October 24 y Nick i�Taritx and seconded b Motion unanimousl ' 1973, regular Planning y Arnie Ryba y approved.' g Commission minutes. PI�.RICI I TG S UP.VEY ; P.�r was Present to 1'axrY Geisler, Development Concept downtown discuss his report of October 31 P Corporation, turnover,par}:ing survey. This survey 1973 o the length of Y is to check tl1e�accuganc conflict areas of time, peak demand times and their locations was conducted ,1~rf P4rking throughout the downtown area, Y level, y, October l This survey . 1973, The Primary finding are for the eveninwas than most parkin g use. There are no g spaces in the downtown -� day. This survey shotas that the par3cing Problems Burin area The parking suz've CBD plan will have g the Y recommendations will be completed in January. T70RDSI;OV; Dick Siaxcaell Y• " -s-La' d were �, • Realtor, Dan Adams, Ken Becker, the November 13Pre"'ent• The Administrator read De , and stelios Chairman read 1973, Park and Recreation recommendations from August n a letter from Dan Herbst Commission meeting. 1972, inquiring about Villa to Russell Larson, dated The sanitary sewer and the g control over PUD1s Chairman re 'Attorney s reply without 'Planning requested an opinion from the Village 18' 1972. g Commission should be dole g Attorne The report dated November 14 g with this Y on what the . 1973, was read b Proposed PiUD. This The Chairman suggestedY the Chairman. Resolution 21.PTordskov petition the 119721. Dan Adams stated that theCPZanninouncil to set aside granted concept approval in April 1972, the condominium or o g Commission had the resolution is pen space cones I1e feels they have not changed not applicable topt from that time. IIe also feels Carl Dale Nordskov. 1973 Stated that a report froze Metro Council dated v States t into new areas hu til areast�hat licy of not extendingOctober l7, unless that have sewer service sewer service Of lakes can be proved. are developed The Chairman polled Planning Commission Of the plan. members as Tim Stone - Is concerned about makin to their opinion Hick Waritz the project will be delayed commitment at this time since ime Arnie Ryba PIrIY opinion is the same as without sewer. Dan Herbst Is concerned with sinion is the treets stated October , 1973. ��7ould like to see layout an relation,73. to�topogxa 5 and develo msee more green Space between State Iiighirayy. John 14eveaux -P "Generall Agrees with the concept on threes with the concept. It is the best use for Piece of Property. out of phase if this r developed Density four years. P in the nextres are threeto first one. This is a much improved plan over the 00&� - Planning Commission 11inutes, November 14, 1973 -2- 7 A motion was made by Nick Waritz and seconded by Arnie Ryba to table , this matter until a later date. Motion unanimously approved. PUD REVIEW: The Administrator has contacted Ken Beiersdorf regarding is -UM on the south side of State Highway 5 in Hennepin County. 1r. Beiersdorf is working on the financing of his plan. The Administrator was unable to contact Gabbert and Gabbert. The Chairman asked the Administrator to set up meetings in January with all PUD owners to discuss their plans. The Planning Commission would like an opinion from the Village Attorney on the Beiersdorf and Gabbert and Gabbert lands. RED CEDAR POINT STUDY: The Planning Commission has completed this stu y On-& p5gsea it to the Council for adoption. A motion was made by Dan Herbst and seconded by Arnie Ryba to adjourn. Meeting adjourned at 10:30 p.m. Jean 2ieuwissen Secretary RussELL H. LAHsow ATTORNEY AT LAW 1fl00 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 November 14, 1973 Mr. John Neveaux Chairman, Planning Commission Village of Chanhassen Box 147 - Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Nordskov of Chanhassen Planned Unit Development (P-2) Dear Mr. Neveaux, TELEPHONE 335-9565 In response to your request that I comment on the proposal of Nordskov that "concept approval of the Planned Unit Development" for its 175 acres be given at this time by the Planning Commission, I submit herewith the following opinion. At the outset, let me state that under the Planning Commission Ordinance (No. 28) the Commission. is an advisory body to the Village Council, and its function is limited to the making of recommendations to the Council in the various areas of its jurisdiction. Stated in another way, it is "reasonable to conclude that the Commission lacks authority to grant approval of any type of development plan. As to the Nordskov plan, it is my view that at the present time the proposal must be limited. solely to consideration of the plan as a "sketch plan" under section 14.05(2) of the Zoning Ordinance. Any further consideration of the matter beyond the sketch plan stage is contrary to the spirit and intent of the Council resolution of September 11, 1972 (No. 119721) which states explicitly that: 1. Land proposed to be developed as a Planned Development District not currently served by sanitary sewer and water will not be considered beyond the Sketch Plan stage as set forth in the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. Mr. John Neveaux Page 2 November 14, 1973 2. The applicant may prepare a Sketch Plan with such supple- mentary documentation set forth under Section 14.05 , paragraph 3 (a) , as the applicant desires for review and informal discussion by the Planning Commission. 3. When the necessary utilities needed to serve the proposed development are available or are imminent, the applicant may then proceed to the Preliminary Development Plan as specified in Section 14.05, paragraph 3, of Ordinance ##47,' Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. We .are all aware that the Metropolitan Council proposes to delay authorizing Phase II of the Lake Ann Interceptor to 1977, notwithstanding the fact that the Sewer Board.had planned the project for 1975. Even if Phase II is planned for 1975, our experience has been that there are frequent delays in implementing a project (viz. Phase I, Lake Ann Interceptor) , so one can hardly say that service is available or imminent until such time as the project is funded, engineered by both the Metro,Council and Sewer Board staffs, and contracts let for the work. It should be kept in mind that the resolution states an applicant may proceed to the preliminary development plan only "when the necessary utilities needed to serve the proposed development are available or are imminent". "Imminent" is defined as "likely to happen without delay". At the present time it cannot be said that the Lake Ann Interceptor, Phase II, is either available .or imminent to serve the Nordskov property. It seems pertinent at this time to refer you to an exchange of letters between Dan Herbst and myself dated August 10th and August 18th, 1972, which letters give a good insight into the background for Resolution 119721. You should have copies of these letters in your file. We have the further problem of Ordinance No. 45 ( the 2-1/2 acre ordinance) which provides that the platting and subdivision of land within, areas not served by sanitary sewer shall be prohibited until sewer is available to serve such area. Turning now to the legal implications which are manifest in the grant of "concept approval" for the Nordskov Planned Unit Development at this time, I can foresee that strong and possibly legally persuasive, arguments could, be made by Nordsko- on a number of points if later the Village insisted on changes in the plan. These points are: 1. Density 2. Zoning 3. Roads 4. Open space and park 5. Ecological/environmental impact Mr. John Neveaux Page 3 November 14, 1973 In short, to grant "concept approval" at this time could have the effect of saying to Nordskov that "your plan is acceptable to the Commission in all respects" and could be construed to constitute approval of a preliminary development plan. This is contrary to the intent of Resolution 119721 and Ordinance 45, and beyond the authority of the Commission under the Zoning Ordinance and the Planning Commission enabling ordinance (No. 28) if a strict construction is placed on the "advisory only" function of the Commission. By way of summary, it is my opinion that the resolution forestalls any further consideration, including the question of "concept approval", of the Nordskov PUD because sewer is neither available nor imminent to, serve the property. RHL:m -�D iy truly"Xours , Russell H. Larson Chanhassen Village Attorney \r NORDSKOV,LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 639MELODY LANE NAPERVILLE, ILLINOIS60540/ 312-357-0011 January 4, 1974 Mr. L. Schnell, Administrator Village of Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota Res Your letter and our subsequent regarding our alleged "overdue" Consultant services. Dear Mr. Schnell: conversation bill for As we discussed in your office, it is our understanding that no consultant fees are due or payable until the Village accepts our preliminary development plan for zoning approval. As yet this has not occured and we received no bill since August 1973. This view is clear in your ordinance and was explained to me by Mr. Tessness in our former conferences. We do believe that a $691.00 fee for review of our concept approval plan and an additional $750,00 fee for a re -review is unusual since we also spent an additional $159000.00 for planning services of a local consultant to facilitate our application. We do not really under- stand the Village's changing consideration of our application since the original presentation, and sincerely hope that a definite answer can be obtained very soon. Our first presentation was made,and accepted, for concept approval in April 1972. Since we have done everything we could and prepared our zoning application plans and have defined them beyond any ordinance requirements, but within its scope, it would seem that we should be allowed to proceed to our public hearing and to a Council vote. Zoning has been granted beyond our land and it appears that a decision must now be made relative to development in the Village with or without the Metro sewer extension as other methods are available. Thank you very much for your time and thoughtful comments regarding our situation. Sincerely. Daniel W. Adams Vice President DWAsmea N DESIGN PLANNING ASSOCIATES, INC. 4826 Chicago Avenue So. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417 Phone: (612) 822-2106 Village of Chanhassen P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Date: December 1, 1973 Job: 123 Fee for professional services rendered during the month of November, 1973: Principal Planner - Carl R: Dzile 1 hour - Reviewed Report,.f �Nordskov PUD Developer �PUD 22 hours - Meeting with Nor'dsko Developer and Planner 1 hour - Reviewed Planning Commission Agenda Items--2//- 11-, hours - Prepared for Planning Commission Meeting —o2i/ ` Z 6 hours @ 30.00 $180.00 Attended 11/14/73 Planning Commission Meeting Mileage 75.00 12.75--2//-,� $267.75 UEC t'q°73 a b -Chin... -GZ of G] AB & B Associates Inc. 639 Melody Lane Naperville, Illinois 60540 (312) 357-4373 January 319 1974 Tot All interested property owners Lake Ann Interceptor Phase II Chanhassen From t ' Daniel W. Adams Rea Funding and construction of said sewer The Cityyrr Council of Chanhassen met on January 28, 19?�4 to discuss the above mentioned sewer construction. The Metro Sewer Board has again delayed this interceptor (until 1977) and unless we take action prior to that, it will probably be again delayed. As property owners and developers -we believe it is in the best interest of each of us as well as the City of Chanhassen to do what is necessary to facilitate the construction of the interceptor. The City Council indicated that.: they would do all they can to help us find a means for the construction of this interceptor... However, they also said that payment for this interceptor -`'and its $500,000 cost must be borne: by those to be served by its installation and the funds for payment on whatever terms ultimately-.. agreed upon must be guaranteed by those served,'. I believe that land acquisition must be done by.. the City (at our cost), to facilitate compliance. Several methods for financing this project have. been considered in inf6rmal discussions between a few -of those interested and are offered here fore.. your perusal and consideration prior to a meeting_ we will have in the very near future. f Consulting Engineers LD - : All.interested property owners Lake Ann Interceptor Phase II Chanhassen January 31 , 1974 Page 2 I. Developers can guarantee so many tie in fees whether or not they build. 1620 fees at $320,00 each are required to totally fund this interceptor in the amount estimated by Schoell and'Madsen, the City Engineering Consultants. This estimate was based on a li% of contract land acquisition cost and a 10% Engineering costs. Preliminary studies have been completeda:' II. A non-profit corporation funded by those intere.ste-d- and established expressly to construct this interceptor. Fees for connection would be charged to pay the loan. Other alternatives are available and we, in cooperation. with the City and Metro Sewer Board must take the lead to determine our own development schedule. As you are well aware, this interceptor has been considered since 1970 and-.'. we are now faced with a still longer delay with no guarantee'°. that this is the last one. Nordskov Land Development Corporation will do its share:to.•.' facilitate this project and I sincerely hope that we, together with you, can see the fruition of this, so needed :.. project. Si cerely,_ AB&B Associates Daniel W. Adams '. President cc: See page 3 for distribution. AS & B Associates Inc. _'� 2 (I / NORDSKOV LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 639MELOQY LANE NAPERVILLE, ILLINOIS60540/ 312-357-0011 January 31, 1974 L. Schnell City of Chanhassen P.O. Box Chanhassen, Minnesota Res Nordskov Zoning Application Dear Mr. Schnell: Enclosed are several copies of a letter I wrote to those interested in the Lake Ann Interceptor. I was delighted when the City Council, at their meeting of January 26th, approved consideration of this Interceptor Cor construction by other than the Metro Sewer Board. It is our belief that Chanhassen should have firm control of its development. After the Council meeting, I contacted several other builders - developers; Oakmont, Ecklund & Swedlund, and Ed Dunn. Each expressed a willingness to participate in this project on terms to be defined. We will persue this vigorously as we believe it is best for us all to make this commitment as soon as possible - certainly we would hope within the 1974 construction year as it would assure Chanhassen of needed revenue. As I indicated at the Council meeting, our commitment to any fees or pay- ments would be contingent on zoning of sufficient units to support that commitment. We have been before the Planning Commission for almost two years now and have expended a great deal of money for Planning and research to extricate a plan which we believe is one of the most comprehensive and highest quality in the Twin -Cities area. We have received many favorable compliments from the Park Board as well as the Planning Commission and ask the City Council to direct the Planning Commission to let us proceed with our Zoning Application as we proceed on the sewer interceptor planning. �4 (_ek (A- Cf L. Schnell City of Chanhassen January 31, 1974 Page 2 We are at present being delayed because of the directive regarding imminency of sewer which was passed after the Planning Commission had given us concept approval and directed us to work with Adolph Tessness in our Preliminary Development Plan. Please prepare an itemized invoice of our City Consultant charges as these will be paid together with our application fee in accordance with your ordinance. As you well know, Zoning is only the first step in the very complicated process of land development. Thank you very much for your thoughtful comments and suggestions regarding the interceptor development methods and our project. Sincerely, Nordskov Land Development Corporation Daniel W. Adams Vice President cc: K.O. Becker W. Dilworth S. Aslanidis, J. Penberthy, Enclosurest (1) Midwest Planning Attorney KOVY 1 YORE/11i LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION I AB & B Associates Inc. 639 Melody Lane Naperville, Illinois 60540 1 (312) 357-4373 February 20, 1974 W.D. Schoell Schoell & Madson, Inc. 50 Ninth Avenue South' Hopkins, Minnesota Res Chanhassen Phase II Interceptor Dear Mr. Schoell'' First I want to thank you for the brochure and cover letter regarding the above mentioned interceptor. We believe, as you do, that Chanhassen must proceed if they are to have any control at all over their city. I enclose a cover letter sent to most property owners along the interceptor. It is an open letter so feel free to use it as you wish. I believe that local coordination is preferable and will work with anyone willing to assume the leadership. Mr. Schnell indicated that the city would look for a petition stating our method and intent for financ- ing and development. We are interested and will be involved but it is critical that we first secure our zoning. I'm sure you are well aware that farm land is not a commodity that banks loan money for and if we are to commit to an assessment we only have one house to tie in. I hope we can secure enough interest to proceed, and that you can attend our meeting when it is held.` Sincerely, Daniel W. Adams Project Manager Nordskov of Chanhassen DWA i mea —�' Consulting Engineers AS & S Associates Inc. 639 Melody Lane Naperville, Illinois 60540 (312) 357-4373 January 31, 1974 Too All interested property owners Lake Ann Interceptor Phase II Chanhassen Fromi Daniel W. Adams t ECEIVED EL 2 5 1974 Reo Funding and construction of said sewer The City Council of Chanhassen met on January 28, 1974 to discuss the above mentioned sewer construction. The Metro Sewer Board has again delayed this interceptor (until 1977) and unless we take action prior to that, it will probably be again delayed. As property owners and developers we believe it is in the best interest of each of us as well as the City of Chanhassen to-do what is necessary to facilitate the construction of the interceptor. The City Council indicated that they would do all they can to help us find a means for the construction of -this interceptor. However, they also said that payment for this interceptar-``and its $500,000 cost must be borne by those to be served by its installation and the funds for payment on whatever terms ultimately agreed upon must be guaranteed by those served. I believe that land acquisition must be done by the City (at our cost), to facilitate compliance. Several methods for financing this project have been considered in infif>rmal discussions between a few.of those interested and are offered here for your perusal and consideaation prior to a meeting we will have in the very near future. + Consulting Engineers All interested property owners Lake Ann Interceptor Phase II Chanhassen January 31, 1974 Page 2 I. Developers can guarantee so many tie in whether or not they build. 1620 fees at $320.00 are required to totally fund this interceptor in amount estimated by Schoell and Madsen, the City Engineering Consultants. This estimate was based 3271, of contract land acquisition cost and a 10% Engineering costs. Preliminary studies have been fees each the on a completed. II. A non-profit corporation funded by those interested and established expressly to construct this interceptor. Fees for connection would be charged to pay the loan. Other alternatives are available and we, in cooperation with the City and Metro Sewer Board must take the lead to determine our own development schedule. As you are well aware, this interceptor has been considered since 1970 and we are now faced with a still longer delay with no guarantee that this is the last one. Nordskov Land Development Corporation will do its share to facilitate this project and I sincerely hope that we, together with you, can see the fruition of this, so needed project. Si�cerely, AB&B Associates Daniel W. Adams President cc: See page 3 for distribution. AS & B Associates Inc. CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - March 25, 1974 -2- NORDSKOV PROPOSED PUD: The City Administrator gave an updated report on the NORDSKOV Proposed PUD. Mr. James Penburthy, NORDSKOV's Attorney was present requesting the Council to pass a resolution in regards to zoning so NORDSKOV can proceed with their plans and contacting the Metro Sewer Board. Discussion followed. A motion was made by Councilman Neveaux and seconded by Councilman Bennyhoff for the City Attorney to prepare a resolution to release NORDSKOV from the Council resolution No.911723 Planned Unit Development District N6-rCurrently Served by Sanitary Sewer and Water, to stay at sketch Plan stages of Ordinance 47, for the execution of an agreement between the City and develope. to be reviwed by the Council at the April 1, 1974 meeting. The following voted in favor thereof: Councilmen Bennyhoff, Hobbs, Kurvers and Neveaux. Mayor Klingelhutz voted no. Motion carried. HOUSING REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: A motion --was made by Councilman Hobbs and seconded by Councilman Neveaux to approve Resolution #10-74 declaring a need to adopt a Housing Redevelopment Authority in Chanhassen. The following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Klingelhutz, Councilmen Bennyhoff, Hobbs, Kurvers and Neveaux. No negative votes. Motion carried. ZONING ORDINANCE #47 SECTION 14.05, SUB -SECTION 4(e): A discussion was held in regards to the recommended changes from the Planning Commission on Section 14.05 Sub-section..4(e) of the Zoning Ordinance. A motion was made by Councilman Bennyhoff and seconded by Councilman Hobbs to send this recommendation back to the Planning Commission for clarifica- tion for the April 1, 1974 Council meeting. The following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Klingelhutz, Councilmen Bennyhoff, Hobbs, Kurvers and Neveaux. No negative votes. Motion carried. TWIN HILLS ESTATES STABLES: A motion was made by Councilman Bennyhoff and seconded by Councilman Hobbs to take no action for or against the Twin Hills Estates Stables until court action is finished. The following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Klingelhutz, Councilmen Bennyhoff, Hobbs, Kurvers and Neveaux. No negative votes. Motion carried. NIKE SITE: A motion was made by Councilman Kurvers and seconded by Councilman Bennyhoff to adopt the Joint Powers Cooperative Agreement for the acquisition of the Nike Site as a Fireman's Training center, and direct the mayor and clerk -administrator to sign the agreement. The following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Klingelhutz, Councilmen Bennyhoff, Hobbs,-Kurvers and Neveaux. No negative votes. Motion carried. A motion was made by Councilman Bennyhoff and seconded.by Councilman Hobbs to adjourn the meeting. The following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Klingelhutz, Councilmen Bennyhoff, Hobbs, Kurvers and..Neveaux.. No negative TIME: 10:20 p.m. Sharon Loechler Secretary JORDSKOV LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 639MELODYLANE NAPERVILLE, ILLINOIS 60540/ 312-357-0011 March 24, 1974- Mr. L. Schnell, Administrator City of Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota Dear Mr. Schnell; I enclose the required deposit for application to legal fees relative to the drafting of our agreement with the City with regards to our zoning application. Thank you for your prompt and cnntinuing follow up of this application as we are very anxious to proceed to what we expect to be approval of our zoning so we can do what we started out to accomplish so long ago. Mr. Penberthy has been asked to contact the Metro Sewer board so that we might have the full story as soon as possible. I look forward to a meeting with you and Jim (Penberthy) in the very near future so we might facilitate the processing of our petition without further delay. I will be available whenever your schedule permits. Sin erely; Daniel W. Adams Vice President DWA:mdaN MAYOR COUNCILMEP C :UNd 3; Ei`v • 5. N PUG. WK. Uit - UTiLiTY SUPT.— CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - March 18, 1974 -5- RENAISSANCE FESTIVAL, CON'T: The Council has considered the standards set forth in Section 23.06 of Ordinance 47 and that the Council finds that the standards prescribed therein are met. COMMUNITY SCHOOLS SUMMER PROGRAM: Vivian Beaugrand and Chuck Hirt were present to explain what the Community Schools have to offer for Summer Recreation and costs involved. A motion was made by Councilman Bennyhoff and seconded by Councilman Neveaux for Vivian Beaugrand and Chuck Hirt to work with the Community Schools on a Summer Program for Chanhassen spending no more than 1500.00. The following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Klingelhutz, Councilmen Bennyhoff, Hobbs, Kurvers and Neveaux. No negative votes. Motion carried. VALLEY AUTO PARTS: The City Attorney, Russ Larson, reviewed with the Council the settlement agreement with Valley Auto Parts. A motion was made by Councilman Neveaux and seconded by Councilman Hobbs to approve the terms and conditions of our settlement agreement dated March 15, 1974 with Valley Auto Parts as edited by the City Attorney. The following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Klingelhutz, Councilmen Bennyhoff, Hobbs, Kurvers and Neveaux. No negative votes. Motion carved. REQUEST FOR SIDE YARD VARIANCE, CASE OF ROGER BIELEFELDT: A motion was made by Councilman Bennyhoff and seconded by Councilman Kurvers to grant a side yard variance of one (1) foot to the property description of NZ of Lot 3 in Auditor's Subdivision #2, from Ordinance #47, Section 7.05 Sub -paragraph 3 for Mr. Roger Bielefeldt. The following voted in favor +-- thereof: Mayor Klingelhutz, Councilmen Bennyhoff, Hobbs, Kurvers and Neveaux. No negative votes. Motion carried. NORDSKOV: Council reviewed the request contained in NORDSKOV's letter dated January 31, 1974. The City Administrator at this time informed the City Council that NORDSKOV had paid in full their overdue account with the City. Further, the City Administrator asked Mr. Russell Larson, City Attorney, to relate to the Council his discussion with Mr. Penburthy, Attorney for NORDSKOV, regarding the request contained in the afore- mentioned letter. Mr. Larson explained that NORDSKOV wants to get Council authorization to proceed past sketch plan planning with their proposed PUD. Council discussed their request and stated that they wanted this matter tabled until the next Council meeting. STORM SEWER: A motion was made by Councilman Neveaux and seconded by Councilman Hobbs to authorize the engineer to conduct.a feasibility study for storm sewer on Frontier Development Park with the cost not to exceed $1,000.00. The following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Klingelhutz, Councilmen Bennyhoff, Hobbs, Kurvers and Neveaux. No negative votes. Motion carried. Councilman Bennyhoff left the meeting. NORTH CHANHASSEN UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 71-lE: A motion was made by Councilman Hobbs and seconded by Councilman Neveaux to approve the purchase of two double throw switches from the Power Company at 477.25 each or 954.50 total, as per the engineers letter dated March 4, 197, VIY-i%iAG3✓ 7610 LAREDO DRIVE • P. O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 0 (612) 474-8885 February 19, 1974 Mr. Daniel Adams Vice President NORDSKOV Land Development Corporation 639 Melody Lane Naperville, Illinois 60540 RE: Your letter dated January 31, 1974 Dear Mr. Adams: Please be advised that the Council reviewed the contents of your letter at their regular City Council meeting on February 18, 1974. In reference to your letter, the Council stated they would take no further action until your overdue account with the City was paid in full. As requested by your letter, an itemized statement of this overdue account is herewith submitted for your information. If you have any further questions on this matter, please feel free to call me. Sirce.`relY yours,/� Lloyd G. Shne`11e dministrator / / f LGS:k Enclosure CHANHASSEN - NORDSKOV PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT LAKE ANN AREA THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, and NORDSKOV LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, hereinafter referred to as Nordskov, this day of 1974. WITNESSETH, That in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto recite and agree as follows: SECTION 1. RECITALS. 1.01 Ownership. Nordskov owns an interest in approximately 240, acres of land known as the Richard B. Lyman farm and described as follows, to -wit: The Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) , the West Half of the Southeast Quarter tV 1/2 of SE 1/4) , the Northerly 60 feet of Government Lot 3, all in Section 10, and all that part of the Northwest (NW 1/4) of Section 15, lying North of the center line of State Trunk Highway No. 5, Township 116, Range 23, containing 240 acres. 1.02 Legal Application for Re-Zonino . On August 8, 1972, Nordskov made application to Chanhassen for a change of zoning from R-lA residential to P-2 planned unit development on approximately 80 acres at the eastern edge of the above described farm. This 80 acres is described as follows, to -wit: The West Half of the Southeast Quarter (W 1/2 of SE 1/4) the Northerly 66 feet of Government Lot #3 all in Section .10 , Township 116, Range 23, containing 80 acres more or less. Hereinafter referred to --as the subject property. 1.03 Restriction to Sketch Plan. Stage. On September 11, 1972, the City Council of Chanhassen, hereinafter referred to as the City Council, enacted Resolution No. 119721 which provides in part: "Land proposed to be developed as a Planned Development District not currently served by sanitary sewer and water will not be considered beyond the Sketch Plan Stage as set forth in the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. " ". .. When the necessary utilities needed to serve the proposed development are available or are imminent, the applicant may then proceed to the Preliminary Develop- ment Plan as specified in Section 14.05 , paragraph 3, of Ordinance No. 47, Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. " 1.04 Availability of Sanitary Sewer and Water. The subject property is not currently served by sanitary sewer and water. 1.05 Metropolitan Sewer Board. On December 27, 1972, the Metropolitan Sewer Board, by a letter from its chief administrator, Richard J. Dougherty, informed Chanhassen that the subject property would be served by an interceptor project, known as the Lake Ann Phase II Interceptor Project. The construction of said project was to commence in September of 1974 and was to be completed in December of 1975. 1.06 Lake Ann Interceptor Target Date. Subsequently, Chanhassen was informed by the Metropolitan Council that construction of the Lake Ann Phase II Interceptor Project would be postponed to 1977, notwithstanding the fact that the Sewer Board had planned the project for 1975. 1.07 Application for Re -Zoning. Nordskov is desirous of proceeding with the re -zoning procedure for the subject property notwithstanding the fact that the necessary utilities are not imminent. SECTION 2. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 2.01 The City Council by a resolution dated March 25, 1974, a copy which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, has agreed to release Nordskov from the restrictions on re -zoning contained in Resolution No. 119721, subject to the terms and conditions of this agreement. 2.02 Resolution No. 119721 notwithstanding, Chanhassen agrees to permit Nordskov, to proceed through and including the Preliminary Development Plan Stage, as specified in Section 14.05, of Ordinance No. 47, also known as the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 2.03 Nordskov agrees that, under the terms of this agreement, that no Final Development Plan, as described in Section 14.05, paragraph 5, Ordinance No. 4 may be either filed with the Zoning Administrator, or submitted to the Planning Commis and the City Council, until such time as the subject property is served by sanitary sewer and water. The above notwithstanding, Nordskov may file said Final Develop- ment Plan with the Zoning Administrator and may submit said Plan .to the Planning Commission and the City Council, upon a finding by the City Council that the construc tion of the sewer and water facilities necessary to serve the subject property is "imminent: " 2.04 Nordskov agrees and understands that this agreement in no way obligati Chanhassen, its Planning Commission, its Zoning Administrator, or its City Council to approve any Sketch Plan, Proposed Development Plan, Preliminary Development MAE Plan, or Final Development Plan. Nordskov further agrees and understands that this agreement does not restrict or limit the power of the City Council to reject any submitted Final Development Plan; that Nordskov proceeds at its own risk and expense in the event that it chooses to proceed beyond the Sketch Plan Stage; and that this agreement notwithstanding, Nordskov must comply with the terms and procedures specified in Chanhassen Ordinance No. 47 for re -zoning. ATTEST: Clerk - Administrator In Presence of: In Presence of: - 3 - CITY OF CHANHASSEN By MAYOR NORDSKOV LAND DEVELOPMENT C ORP ORATI ON By Its And Its CUSBASSEN VILLAGE 7610 LAREDO DRIVE • P. O. BOX 147 9 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 • (612) 474-8885 April 3, 1974 MEMO TO: Councilman Kuryers Councilman B,ennyho f f Councilman Hobbs Councilman Neveaux FROM: Lloyd G. Schnelle,,Clerk-Administrator SUBJECT: Special Council Meeting Regarding NORDSKOV REFERENCE: (a) Mayor Klingelh.utz's letter dated April 3, 197.4 1. Reference (a) has directed me to inform al Council members that there will be a special Council meeting Monday morning at 8:00 p.m., June 10, 1974. This meeting will be held at the Council Chambers of the City Hall. 2. The topic of discussion at this meeting will be the City Council's action taken on the NORDSKOV Land Development Corp- orat}qn at their regular meeting on April, 1974. , Clerk -Administrator HANBASSEN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE • P. O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 • (612) 474-8885 April 3, 1974 •fuiW0 TO: Councilman Kurvers Councilman Bennyhoff Councilman Hobbs Councilman Neveaux FROM: Lloyd G. Schnelle, Clerk -Administrator SUBJECT: Special Council Meeting Regarding NORDSKOV REFERENCE: Ca) Mayor Al Klingelhutz's letter dated April 3, 1974 1. Reference (.a) has directed me to inform all Council members that there will be a special Council meeting Saturday morning at 9:30 a.m., April 6, 1974. This meeting will be held at the Council Chambers of the City Hall. 2. The topic of discussion at this meeting will be the City ... Council's action taken on the NORDSKOV Land Devdlopment Corp- orat'zQn at their r _?ular meeting on April 1, 1974. Lloyd G.-/Schnelle, Clerk -Administrator cc: Mayor Al Klingelhutz Mr. Russell'Larson, City Attorney City Council Box 147 Chanhassen, Gentlemen: R.ITSSELL H. LARSON ATTORNEY AT LAW 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 March 29, 1974 MN 55317 Re: Nordskov Planned Development District Agreement TELEPHONE 335-9565 Attached please find our preliminary draft of the proposed agreement between the City and Nordskov whereby the latter is to be permitted to go forward with its planned development district application beyond the sketch plan stage. Please feel free to suggest changes in the language and the addition of further provisions to this agreement. -Very truly Nrs , Russell H. Larson Chanhassen City Attorney RHL:m Attachment cc: All Councilmembers Lloyd G. Schnelle, City Administrator MAYOR cOUNCUO.EN COUNCILMEN COUNCILMEN Ct I1i;C r-."AEN 'LEAS. ST. Z?N'NG 6LGG. INSP. �, r='U l.,i. Ds;3. UT;L.iY SUPr. R.USSELL H. LARSON ATTORNEY AT LAw i9oo FIRST NATIONAL BANH BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 RUSsELL H. LARSON CRAIG M. MERTZ March 28, 1974 Mr. James G. Penberthy 351 Second Street Excelsior, MN 55331 Re: Nordskov P. U. D. Dear Jim, Enclosed please find the rough draft of an agreement between Nordskov and Chanhassen which I have drafted. Please feel free to call either Russ or myself if you have any comments or suggestions relative to this matter. Very truly yours, Craig M. Mertz Assistant City Attorney Chanhassen, Minnesota CMM:m Enclosure cc: Lloyd G. Schnelle City Administrator TELEPHONE 335-0565 MAYOR _ _ - COUNCILMEN COUNCILMEN - COUNCILM-EN CoUNG'ELPAEN CLK-X? id_ TRL S ___--•T—r+ ASS & f Seir..IN-SP. .pU.€.. s O= R� CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — April 6, 1974 -1- The special Chanhassen City Council meeting was called to order -at 9:45 a.m. on April 6, 1974. The following members were present: Mayor Klingelhutz, Councilmen Bennyhoff, Hobbs,.Kurvers and Neveaux. Also in attendance at this meeting was the Clerk -Administrator, Lloyd G. Schnelle and City Attorney, Russell H. Larson. The special meeting was called by Mayor Al Klingelhutz by written communication dated April 4, 1974, directing the Clerk -Administrator to notify the Chanhassen City Council by letter that there would be a special meeting to discuss the agreement between NORDSKOV Land Development Corp. and the City of Chanhassen regarding planning. Accordingly, the City Clerk -Administrator in accordance with the Mayor's request did so by written communication, dated April 4, 1974, notified all City Council members of this meeting and the City Attorney. The City Council at this special meeting reviewed the action that they had taken in regards to NORDSKOV at the previous Council special meeting on March 25, 1974. At the March 25, 1974, meeting, the Council directed the City Attorney to prepare an agreement between the City of Chanhassen and NORDSKOV whereby the City Council would be releasing NORDSKOV from Council Resolution #911723 to allow NORDSKOV to proceed with the planning procedures in accordance with Ordinance #47 as dictated by the agreement. Then, at their April 1, 1974 meeting, wherein they voted no stating the following reasons "To refuse NORDSKOV's request that they be relieved from the provisions of Council Resolution #911723 and be permitted to proceed beyond Sketch plan stage." A motion was made by Councilman Bennyhoff and seconded by Councilman Neveaux to approve the Agreement between NORDSKOV and the City of Chanhassen which would release NORDSKOV from Council Resolution 011723 to allow them to proceed with planning in accordance with Ordinance #47 but guided by the contents of this agreement. Further, that the following stipulation be inserted in this agreement: a. NORDSKOV has acknowledged that it has received no approval of sketch plan from any; City agency. b. NORDSKOV acknowledges that it has received no approval for construction either by private capitol or public financing for trunk sewer to serve their premises. Secondly, the Council hereby authorized the Mayor and Clerk -Administrator for the City of Chanhassen to sign said agreement. The following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Klingelhutz, Councilmen Bennyhoff, Hobbs, Kurvers and Neveaux. No negative votes. Motion carried. Councilman Kurvers stated for the record that he reconsidered his no vote of the previous meeting of April 1, 1974 and voted yes at this meeting because due to the fact of clarification, off certain articles with the 0 agreement. _ JZ9 Meeting Adjourned at 12:OKp.m. /��acnneile -Administrator CHANHASSEN - NORDSKOV PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT LAKE ANN AREA THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, and NORDSKOV LAND DEVELOPMENT�PORATION, a Ill;oiscorporation, hereinafter referred to as Nordskov, this day of !(i 1974. WITNESSETH, That in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto recite and agree as follows: SECTION 1. RECITALS. 1.01 Ownership. Nordskov owns an interest in approximately 240 acres of land known as the Richard B. Lyman farm and described as follows, to -wit: The Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) , the West Half of the Southeast Quarter (W 1/2 of SE 1/4) , the Northerly 60 feet of Government Lot 3, all in Section 10, and all that part of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of Section 15, lying North of the center line of State Trunk Highway No. 5, Township 116, Range 23, containing 240 acres. 1.02 Application for Preliminary Development Plan and Rezoning Approval. On August 8, 1972, Nordskov made application to Chanhassen for a change of zoning from R-lA residential to P-2 planned development district on approximately 80 acres at the eastern edge of the above described farm. This 80 acres is described as follows, to -wit: The West Half of the Southeast Quarter (W 1/2 of SE 1/4) the Northerly 66 feet of Government Lot #3 all in Section 10, Township 116, Range 23, containing 80 acres more or less, hereinafter referred to as the subject property. 1.03 Restriction to Sketch Plan Stage. On September 11, 1972, the City Council of Chanhassen, hereinafter referred to as the City Council, enacted Resolution No. 119721 which provides in part: "Land proposed to be developed as a Planned Development District not currently served by sanitary sewer and water will not be considered beyond the Sketch Plan Stage as set forth in the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. " RHL - 4/9/74 "...When the necessary utilities needed to serve the proposed development are available or are imminent, the applicant may then proceed to the Preliminary Develop- ment Plan as specified in Section 14.05 , paragraph 3, of. Ordinance No. 47, Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. " 1.04 Availability of Sanitary Sewer and Water. The subject property is not currently served by sanitary sewer and water. 1.05 Metropolitan Sewer Board. On December 27, 1972, the Metropolitan Sewer Board, by a letter from its chief administrator, Richard J. Dougherty, informed Chanhassen that the subject property would be served by a sewer interceptor project, known as the Lake Ann Phase II Interceptor Project. The construction of said project was to commence in September of 1974 and was to be completed in December of 1975. 1.06 Lake Ann Interceptor Target Date. Subsequently, Chanhassen was informed by the Metropolitan Council that construction of the Lake Ann Phase II Interceptor Project would be postponed to 1977, notwithstanding the fact that the Sewer Board had planned the project for 1975. 1.07 Proposed Preliminary Development Plan. Nordskov is desirous that the City proceed with consideration of Nordskov's preliminary development plan and applica- tion for rezoning for the subject property, notwithstanding the fact that the necessary utilities are not imminent. 1.08 No_Sketch Plan Approval. Nordskov acknowledges that prior hereto it has not received sketch plan approval, either formal or informal, from the City Council, its Planning Commission or Zoning Administrator. SECTION 2. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 2.01 The City Council by a resolution dated March 25, 1974, has directed the City Attorney to prepare an agreement to release Nordskov from the restrictions containec in Resolution No. 119721, subject to the terms and conditions of this agreement. 2.02 Resolution No. 119721 notwithstanding, Chanhassen agrees to permit Nordskov, to proceed with submission of its Preliminary Development Plan, as specified in Section 14.05 , of Ordinance No. 47, also knoan as the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance 2.03 Nordskov agrees that, under the terms of this agreement, that no Final Development Plan, as described in Section 14.05, paragraph 5, Ordinance No. 47, may be either filed with the Zoning Administrator, or submitted to the Planning Commission and the City Council, until such time as the subject property is served by sanitary sewer and water. The above notwithstanding, Nordskov may file said Final Develop- ment Plan with the Zoning Administrator and may submit said Plan to the Planning Commission and the City Council, upon a finding by the City Council that the construction of the sewer and water facilities necessary to serve the subject property is imminent. -2RHL - 4/9/74 - a 2.04 Nordskov agrees and understands that this agreement in no way obligates Chanhassen, its Planning Commission, its Zoning Administrator, or its City Council to approve any Sketch Plan, Proposed Preliminary Development Plan, Preliminary Develop- ment Plan, Final Development Plan, or rezoning. Nordskov further agrees and under- stands that this agreement does not restrict or limit the power of the City Council to reject any submitted development plan or application for rezoning; that Nordskov proceed at its own risk and expense in the event that it chooses to proceed beyond the Sketch Plan Stage; and that this agreement notwithstanding, Nordskov must comply with the terms and procedures specified in Chanhassen Ordinance No. 47. 2.05 Nordskov acknowledges that it has not received approval from the City Council for the construction, either by public or private financing, of trunk sanitary sewer to serve the premises. 1 ATTEST r Cl rk / -Administrator 1 Presence of: .�k CITY OF CHANHASSEN By ZZkt MAYOR NORDSKOV LAND DEVELOPMENT C ORPORATI ON BY r Its 44a A ES10 OJT And Its SEG�C7!r - y RHL - 4/9/74 -3- RUSSELL H. LARSON ATTORNEY AT LAW 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANH BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE 335 - 05 G 5 April 9, 1974 Mr. James G. Penberthy 351 Second Street Excelsior, MN 55331 Re: Nordskov - Chanhassen Dear Jim, Attached are the original and one copy of the revised Nordskov - Chanhassen agreement allowing Nordskov to proceed with the submission of its development plan on the Lyman property. Please have Nordskov execute both copies whereupon they are to be returned to me for execution by the appropriate. City officials. urs , Ed if 0 W/F Russell H. Larson Chanhassen City Attorney RHL:m Attachments cc:l/]C. G. Schnelle, City Administrator All Councilmembers MAYOR COUNCILMEN _ COUNCILMEN COUNCILMEN couNCILMEN CLK-ADM. TRE,\S. ASST. ZONii G & BLDG. iNSP. PUB. W� - D,R. UTILITY SUPT. CHANHASSEN - NORDSKOV PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT LAKE ANN AREA THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter. referred to as the City, and NORDSKOV LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, hereinafter referred to as Nordskov, this day of , 1974. WITNESSETH, That in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto recite and agree as follows: SECTION 1. RECITALS. 1.01 Ownership. Nordskov owns an interest in approximately 240 acres of land known as the Richard B. Lyman farm and described as follows, to -wit: The Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) , the West Half of the Southeast Quarter (W 1/2 of SE 1/4) , the Northerly 60 feet of Government Lot 3, all in Section 10, and all that part of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of Section 15, lying North of the center line of State Trunk Highway No. 5, Township 116, Range 23, containing 240 acres. 1.02 Application for Preliminary Development Plan and Rezoning Approval. On August 8, 1972, Nordskov made application to Chanhassen for a change of zoning from R-lA residential to P-2 planned development district on approximately 80 acres at the eastern edge of the above described farm. This 80 acres is described as follows, to -wit: The West Half of the Southeast Quarter (W 1/2 of SE 1/4) the Northerly 66 feet of Government Lot #3 all in Section 10, Township 116, Range 23, containing 80 acres more or less, hereinafter referred to as the subject property. 1.03 Restriction to Sketch Plan Stage . On September 11, 1972, the City Council of Chanhassen, hereinafter referred to as the City Council, enacted Resolution No. 119721 which provides in part: "Land proposed to be developed as a Planned Development District not currently served by sanitary sewer and water will not be considered beyond the Sketch Plan Stage as set forth in the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. " "...When the necessary utilities needed to serve the proposed development are available or are imminent, the applicant may then proceed to the Preliminary Develop- ment Plan as specified in Section 14.05, paragraph 3, of Ordinance No. 47, Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. " 1.04 Availability of Sanitary Sewer and Water. The subject property is not currently served by sanitary sewer and water. 1.05 Metropolitan Sewer Board. On December 27, 1972, the Metropolitan Sewer Board, by a letter from its chief administrator, Richard J. Dougherty, informed Chanhassen that the subject property would be served by a sewer interceptor project, known as the Lake Ann Phase II Interceptor Project. The construction of said project was to commence in September of 1974 and was to be completed in December of 1975. 1.06 Lake Ann Interceptor Target Date. Subsequently, Chanhassen was informed by the Metropolitan .Council that construction of the Lake Ann Phase II Interceptor Project would be postponed to 1977, notwithstanding the fact that the Sewer Board had planned the project for 1975. 1.07 Proposed Preliminary Development Plan. Nordskov is desirous that the City proceed with consideration of Nordskov's preliminary development plan and applica- tion for rezoning for the subject property, notwithstanding the fact that the necessary utilities are not imminent. 1.08 - No Sketch Plan Approval. Nordskov acknowledges that prior hereto it has not received sketch plan approval, either formal or informal, from the City Council, its Planning Commission or Zoning Administrator. SECTION 2. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 2.01 The City Council by a resolution dated March 25, 1974, has directed the City Attorney to prepare an agreement to release Nordskov from the restrictions contained in Resolution No.. 119721, subject to the terms and conditions of this agreement. 2.02 Resolution No. 119721 notwithstanding, Chanhassen agrees to permit Nordskov, to proceed with submission of its Preliminary Development Plan, as specified in Section 14.05 , of Ordinance No. 47, also knoan as the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance 2.03 Nordskov agrees that, under the terms of this agreement, that no Final Development Plan, as described in Section 14.05, paragraph 5, Ordinance No. 47, may be either filed with the Zoning Administrator, or submitted to the Planning Commission and the City Council, until such time as the subject property is served by sanitary sewer and water. The above notwithstanding, Nordskov may file said Final Develop- ment Plan with the Zoning Administrator and may submit said Plan to the Planning Commission and the City Council, upon a finding by .the ,City Council that the construction of the sewer and water facilities necessary to serve, the subject property is imminent. - 2 - RHL - 4/9/74 2.04 Nordskov agrees and understands that this agreement in no way obligates Chanhassen, its Planning Commission, its Zoning Administrator, or its City Council to approve any Sketch Plan, Proposed Preliminary Development Plan, Preliminary Develop- ment Plan, Final Development Plan, or rezoning. Nordskov further agrees and under- stands that this agreement does not restrict or limit the power of the City Council to reject any submitted development plan or application for rezoning; that Nordskov proceed: at its own risk and expense in the event that it chooses to proceed beyond the Sketch Plan Stage; and that this agreement notwithstanding, Nordskov must comply with the terms and procedures specified in Chanhassen Ordinance No. 47. 2.05 Nordskov acknowledges that it has not received approval from the City Council for the construction, either -by public or private financing, of trunk sanitary sewer to serge the premises. ATTEST: Clerk - Administrator In Presence of: In Presence of: - 3 - CITY OF CHANHASSEN By MAYOR NORDSKOV LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION By Its And Its RHL 4/9/74 bailey & eirociotor Mr. Lloyd Schnelle Clerk Administrator City of Chanhassen 7610 Laredo Drive Chanhassen; Minnesota 55317 Dear Lloyd: Jerry L. Bailey, Principal Ronald G. Bailey, P.E., Administrator Gene F. Ernst, A.S.L.A., Senior Associate Paul H. Baerman, Associate Christopher W. Colby Doug Iler June 13, 1974 I've been asked by Mr. Kenneth Becker and Mr. Daniel Adams from AB & B Associates in Naperville, Illinois to submit a proposal for providing detailed site planning consulting services on a 13 acre parcel at the junction of highways 5 and 117 in Chanhassen which would be used for a sports center complex. Prior to finalizing this proposal, I would appreciate receiving some indication from the Village of Chanhassen as to whether or not the above mentioned project and the gentlemen present- ing it have been favorably received. Although the project seems to be quite interesting and would be an attractive project for our firm to work on, I prefer to represent only clients whose motives are deemed to be in the best interests of a municipality. I would greatly appreciate an immediate response from you as I am attempting to make a decision on this matter within the next few days. Thanks, Lloyd. Best regards, BAILEY & ASSOCIATES Jerr 'Bailey Pri ipal JLB:cr MAYOR -- COUNCILMEN WUN LIMEN t1(UR.Qi LM E.N. 1�.OQ,!"Xs00.Eta_ TR _-A$, r AS,5T;.-40Nl NG & BLDJ1 iNSP. PUB. WK. D:ii. LJJLiT_Y,_ S_UPT.. landscape architects* land planners I ionathan village center* Chaska, minnesota 55318 • phone 612/448-2161 I6^ WILLIAM D. SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON JACK T. VOSLER jANIES R.ORR HAROLD E. DAHLIN LARRY L. HANSON RAYMOND J. JACKSON WILLIAM J. 6REZINSKY JACK E. GILL FRANK V. LASKA SCHOELL & MA®SON, INC. W' ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS 7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 MAYOR June 5, 1974 COUNCILMEN COUNCILMEN COUNCILMEN COUNCILr✓iEN Mr. Dan Adams CLk-ADM. Nordskov Land Development Corporation TREAS. 639 Melody Lane fSST. ZCNING Napierville, Illinois 60540 & BLDG.INSP. PUB. WK. D;R. Subject: Nordskov, Chanhassen, Minn. UTILITY SUPT. Dear Dan: On receiving your phone message that the Midwest Planning bro- chure contains the drainage and utility drawings I requested Monday, I checked the various graphics. No. 15 ,shows a general layout for three types of pipes, but at such a small scale that it is difficult' to differentiate. Perhaps Midwest can supply us with a larger scale drawing of this plate so that we can complete our check and report on the First Phase. Very truly yours, CITY ENGINEER WDSchoell:sd cc: Midwest Planning, Attn: Mr. Stelios Aslanidis Lloyd Schnelle, Administrator June 5, 1974 10:20 A.M. e Mr. Schoell: Dan Adams called re Nordskov project. lie has dhecked with Midwest Planning and drainage drawing is in brochure. Utilities required for Phase I taly. He will call back later. Shirley JOi�DSKOV LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 639MELODY LANE NAPERVILLE, ILLINOIS60540/ 312-357-0011 April 19, 1974 Mr. Lloyd Schnelle, Administrator City of Chanhassen 7610 Laredo Drive Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Nordskov's Zoning application Dear Mr. Schnelle: I have signed sealed and sent to Mr. James Penberthy 3 copies of the agreement Mr. Larson prepared between the City of Chanhassen and Nordskov. I have asked him to expedite this immediately. In preparation for our zoning application completion, I have also told Midwest Planning to be prepared to follow zoning ordinance #47 to the letter and to do so under your direction. At your earliest convenience, I would appreciate a review of our requirements with Mr. Penberthy and me. I asked Carl Dale for his latest report regarding our application. He indicated that he would be very happy to review our plan and meet with us providing we handled all arrangements thru your office and that you approved said meetings. This we, of course, will comply with. Mr. Schnelle, we have been associated with the City of Chanhassen for quite some time, have spent much time, effort, and money there. We are now taxpayers and happy to be so. The very reasons we chose Chanhassen are more positive today than every before. Thank you and the City Council for your fair and equitable answer to our request. It has been a pleasure to work with you the past year and I thank you again for your suggestions regarding our project. Sin�,erely, 4an 1 W. Adams Vice President Nordskov cc: J. Penberthy DWA:mea MAYOR COUNCILMEN COUNCIJAF-N COUNCIL;40 SST. ZoWNG ';LE1�7, 1;-4SP. UI"IL'I Y SUP S SITE PLAN REVIEW NORDSKOV OF CHANHASSEN, P.U.D. APPROXLMATELY 175 ACRESs Wk, SAO SECTION 100 T116Nj R23W PLAN BY: MIDWEST PLANNING & RESEARCH INC. 2101 HENNEPIN AVENUE MINNEAPOLISO MINNESOTA 55405 REQUESTED BYt LLOYD SCHNELLE FOR THE CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWED BY: ROBERT A. LUETH, SOIL SCIENTIST DONALD C. BERG, DISTRICT CONSERVATIONIST USDA SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE CITY HALL WACONIAt MINNESOTA 55387 JUNE 14, 1974 IN COOPERATION WITH.: CARVER SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT. 4 , I have reviewed the soil conditions as related to building site limitations. on the approximate 175 acre site, as submitted to the Carver Soil and Water r Conservation District on June 61 1974s This inventory and evaluation will help the land developer and the village consider the adequacy of the plan in terms of the following: 1. Limitations of soils for the intended use. 2. Prevention of erosion due to land disturbance. 3. Conservation treatment of storm drainage water to control increased runoff and protect downstream landowners. 4. Harmonious development of roads in relation to slope, soils, drainage, and landscaping. 5. Construction and maintenance of water and erosion control structures where needed. Soil survey mapping units have been drawn over the preliminary plat map and color coded to show building site limitations: Green has slight limitations Yellow has moderate limitations Red has severe limitations Blue has very severe limitations. The solid colors show land slopes, land alteration, soil erosion and :sediment hazard limitations. The lined colors show wetness limitations. The soil mapping units and major building site limitations found on the prop- erty are listed below: Building Site Soil Map Color Limitations Soil Name Slope Fanpe Symbol Green Slight land alteration Hayden loam 2 to 6 % HaB and soil erosion Green Slight land alteration Lester loam 2 to 6 % LaB and soil erosion Yellow Moderate land alteration Hayden loam 6 to 12 % Hac and soil erosion Yellow Moderate land alteration Lester loam; 6 to 12 % LaC and soil erosion Red Severe land alteration Hayden loam 12 to 18 % HaD, HaD2 and soil erosion Blue Very severe land altera• Hayden loam 18 to 40 % HaE, HaE2v tion and soil erosion liar Yellow Moderate wetness LeSueur clay loam 0 to 2 % LsA lines Red lines Severe wetness Red lines Severe wetness Blue lines Very severe wetness and Cordova Wdbster 0 to 2-% Cw silty clay loam Glencoe silty 0 to 2 % Ge clay loam ' Peat and muck,deep over 3� feet Pd SOIL AND WATET: CONSERVATION CONSIDERATIONS The Hayden (Ha) and Lester (Lasoils nandslopes sl£ght,erosion andgreen) sedimentthe least landscape alteration red,uirements hazard. The Hayden and Lester_, soils on C slopes (6 to 127. - yellow),have moderate land- scape alteration requirements and a moderate erosion and sediment hazard. The Hayden soils on D slopes (12 to 18"!. - red) have severe landscape alteration requirements and severe erosion and sediment hazard* The Hayden soils on E slopes (18 to 24% - blue) and F slopes (257.+ - blue) have very severe landscape alteration requirements and a very severe erosion and sediment hazard. The erosion and sediment hazards and the conservation practices needed to con- trol soil erosion during construction is very important on this site because the Northern one-half of the property drains directly into Lake Ann or the ad- jacent marsh located West of the lake. The Southern one-half of the property drains into Bluff Creek. The Cordova -Webster silty clay loam (Cw) and the Glencoe silty clay laom (Ge) soils (red lines) have severe wetness limitations.' The deep Peat andlnuck (Pd) soils (blue lines)'have a very severe wetness limitation. These soils have a seasonal high water table that will cause basement seepage and other wetness problems. (See soil descriptions-) The architect should prepare a'soil and water conservation plan as an integral part of the site plan that would show the followingt (See Metro Association of Soil and Water Conservation District's Urban Erosion Control Handbook pages listed after each item.) 1. Orient the development to the site so that minimum land grading and other site preparation is required- (pp 3-4) 2• A surface water runoff and soil erosion control plan using grass water• ways (pp 33-35), storm drains, erosion control structures (pp 45-48)0 debris basins (pp 21-29), and water control diversions (pp 39-41). A drainage plan should show the subsurface drainage and/or sump pumps and foot£ng'drains, and the method of basement waterproofing that willbe used to keep the seasonal water table below basement floor levels in the Cor- dova -Webster and Glencoe silty clay loam soil areas. 3. Surface waterways (pp 33-35) and subsurface storm drainage facilities should be completed and made operational as soon as possible. ,Silt traps should be used to protect inlets during construction. - 4• A planned time table for the development phases, such as road -parking lot construction, pavingg curbing# house building, lot grading (pp 3-4), and seeding (pp 5-10). 5. Plan to.stock pile top soil for use in final grading for a seed bed. (pp 2) 6• Plan for revegetation with sod, final grass seedings (pp 5-10),'and with temporary mulch or seedings on areas to be exposed for 30 days or more.(pp11) in1* Save treesp shrubs# and grass on the steep slope OverlookZ-17) lake. This area can be improved with new plantings. (pp 8* Additional soils and geologic investigation should be made on question- •ble soils and/or where multi -stow 'structures are'vianned. The following is a short description of the soils found on the property and their limitations for building sites, foundations for low buildings, and streets or low cost roads. IiaB, HaCs, HaD, HaD2, HaE, HaE2, liaF Hayden loam Hayden soils consist of undulating to steep, well drained soils formed+in glacial till on convex upland slopes. The surface layer is very dark gray loam about 4 inches thick. The subsurface layei is dark grayish brown loam about 7; inches thick, The subsoil is dominantly yellowish brown firm clay loam about--34 inches thick. The underlying material is light olive brown loam. The major building site limitation is very severe landscape alteratiorcand erosion and sediment hazard on the E and F slopes (18 to.40%), severe landscape -alteration and erosion and sediment hazard on the D slopes (12 to 18%), and moderate landscape alteration and erosion and sediment hazard on the C slopes (6 to 12%)... In many Hayden areas, water moves through the soil very slowly and basement seepage is a common problem. When used as foundations for low buildings, they have:- a moderate limi.tationa medium shear strength, moderate shrink -swell potential, medium compressibility, medium bearing values, and basement seepage is a common problem. When used for streets and low-cost roads, they have a moderate shrink -swell poten- tial, moderate susceptibility to frost action, moderately fine textured subsoil, and are found on gently sloping to steep topography. On slopes over 12% the limi- tation becomes severe because of deep cuts and fills. The road maintenance prob- lems also increase as the slope increases, especially from erosion and,.seepage. LaB, LaC Lester loam The Lester soils are well drained loamy soils. The loamy glacial tillAs com- monly many feet thick. They occupy 3 to 20 acre irregular, gently sloping hill- tops and knolls and smooth sloping to steep side slopes. The major building site limitation is slight landscape alteration and erosion and sediment hazard on.the B slopes (2 to 6%) and moderate landscape alteration and erosion and sediment hazard on the C slopes (6 to 120/.). When used as foundations for low buildings, the limitation is moderate:' medium shear strength, moderate shrink swell potentials, medium bearing values, medium compressibility. When used as streets and tential, moderately fine action, gently sloping to low-cost roads, they have textured subsoil, moderate steep topography* a moderate shrink -swell po- susceptibility to frost r LsA LeSueur',clay loam LeSueur clay loams are moderately well to somewhat poorly drained loamy soils over heavy loam or light clay loam glacial till. The building site limitation is wetness with the seasonal water table at 3 to 5 feet for short periods,. When used as foundations for low buildings, they have moderate limitations medium shear strength, moderate shrink -swell potential, medium compressibility, medium bearing values and possible high seasonal water table. When used for streets and low-cost roads, they have a moderate shrink -swell po- tential, moderately fine textured subsoil* and moderate susceptibility to frost action* Cw, Ge Cordova -Webster silty clay loam, Glencoe silty clay loam Very poorly drained..clay loam and silty clay loam soils. These medium textured materials are commonly many feet thick, The subsoils are typically neutral, They occupy i to 5 acre depressions and 5 to 40 acre long, winding, low gradient drainageways. Commonly associated soils are the poorly drained Webster__soilsy the sloping Lester and Hayden soils, and the.peat and muck soils. The major building site limitation is wetness. The Cordova soil -Is poorly drained and tbe=Glencoe soil is very poorly drained and has a high seasonal water table that ranges from near the surface to a depth of 3 to 5 feet-* When used as foundations for low buildings, they have a severe limitation: high water table, medium to low shear strength and bearing values, moderate shrink - swell potential, and a medium compressibility* When used for streets and low-cost roads, they have a high seasonal water table, are occasionally ponded, and have a high susceptibility to frost action, mod- erate shrink -swell potential, and a moderately fine texture. Pd Peat and muck, deep Peat and muck are very poorly drained organic materials over loam. They are neutral, very poorly drained, moderately permeable, high in organic matter with a high water holding capacity. .They occur in sloughs, pot holes and drainage - ways. The major building site limitations are frequent ponding and organic material that is very poorly drained with the water table near the surface or ponded.- Septic tanks will not function in these soils. When used as foundations for low buildings, they have unfavorable soil character- istics, including organic soil that is very poorly drained and has a high water table. When used for. streets and low-cost roads, they have a low bearing capacity with the.water table near the surface and an organic surface texture. i For additional soil information, see "Soil Survey - Carver County, Minnesota", United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Services November 1968. The soil investigationsp mapping and interpretations ordinarily apply to the upper 5 to 6 feet of soil`taaterial. There should be additional onsite investi- gation relating directly to the proposed uses before construction is started. Attached: Development Plan With Soil Mapping Units Colored to Show Building Site Limitations and Color Key M M : lN, SIGNPLANNING S 0P�'z) 11, INC. 4826 Chicago Avenue So. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417 Phone: (612) 822-2106 July 1, 1974 or: P1 unn i Cc..,.7�"Is s i Oil Vi 11 a:j of C ian;iasseii , { i nnesa to y: Cal R. Dale, A. P Planning Consultant Subliec . Planning Rev i e i - Revi sed PUg PI an lF or 'ordsIN, ov Deve1 opnent Planninq Coln S1derations 1. This matter has been before the Planning Comr:issiori at numerous previous mieeti ngs . ii4hi I e prior pl ans :were . con- sidered to be, as a broad "concept", in general conformity to the Comprehensive Village Plan -they were not considered adequate or co^pI& eenough for any type of final appro;: al . fit the s ugges ti on of Village Officials and staff , the ,lords!;ov Land Development- Company has retained the Services of a 1 oca 1 planning consul Cant t0 assist. in developing more complete and revised plans for submission to t,le Pl anni ng Coririi ssi con . 2. Earlier plans for the approximately 175 acres- of land located east of County Road 117 and north of State Highway No. 5 ,were considered deficient in several respects: a) Lack of ev i dence to i ndi cafe rel ati onshi.p to total, area -wide, planning and development considerations. b) Some rather obvious deficiencies in traffic .circulation. c) Inadequate explanation and jlaStl I ication for proposed densities. d) Lack of clarity and, purpose. e) Pot - en ti a for "strip" cof:mmerci al development. f) Probable co,.fl . cts betoten site plans and topograpily. . g) Various others in varj`ing degrees of m ipOrtanCe. j. Greatly rev ls'd c.n Cons' '.crnhly l i;;'7b'2u pl'n5 `rlav? [?eeii s u u Rl i t'te for rev! i, by the PI ann I nib Consul tan t R4- hi s Up Li 0n , �iie app ! i has appa'f''-eii"'.I e IUes t e d t '11e ral l'.3 1 ng t? ) t" V ; C. 0- D. '� Ci p J .` C: 1 1 Gr t [,e e n i, re / .J acres. h) PiJD 7_Qiii nC: for t'.c ee a 5 -e, 1 v S'C acres . C) l ni: i Ci`�' , C' )i. 'il pi d„ p;-oval Q, Li. i i rsi ri-se Qi COils "li i0? %, 14Ch ")CCU." es i:1� soi,..,..._--.'si CG.'n r �h ;(1 ark",? L :` -40i� niuin Q i .,i�_ E, _� �� 7 c C � ,ii�. �j l •,ii•_ �a i V t i;u CC;%:.:U t� u ri 1 t S . Note: At one time, land west of County Road 117 was in- cluded in this PUD application but has since been ommitted and has most recently been reviewed by the Planning Commission for the relocation site of instant Shade. i'i�Sb of i;'�.i 7' i l_ 1�E<<:>; i1J G', 1 C._:i,'J !"!l . -i :.. U i L ., 1 P.. l :� it n 1 Jl J r '., �: � �.� , ... 0 n C u u .... C 'J I � ll �] i t � �F a Ci'o'. C d i 1 0 -r ? 2i'L :1n 1 ,: 0i 2 etl Ilti ; C, SC4N a reaso;rs _ c iinie is %led d for th- Co;7i,,isS n L?eiiib2rs T..o revi`-:,;, absor1"- t Ine 1 n' o r i � a i o a, ndI coime i o a f nd_-ci Siorr. r ,r,:il e r , p,can i:ien_.I:e nts :,aay 0 r m_,Y nCt ue requir" d_ b) A d e u a t a tine for staf-J:: response and r -- c o m, :,mendations i s needed to i ncluda al 1 r e q u i re+.ants ai d cond1 t i o n s to the "PUD Permit" Zonln9 Contras:.). c) Local ordinances require that "final" plan approval be based upon an acceptable time schedule for installation of s a n i tart' se;qer. 5-. Nievi plans include.considerably more in-depth analysis of the- site and area. Such analysis includes topography, soils, veg`tation, location, transportation, drainage, and the.lik<e. Such analysis has resulted in the developer deferring plans for the western portion at this time as was recommended by the Planning Commission soria months ago. - 6. Mayor changes in the plan include the following.. - a) The consideration of a possible "strip" commercial development has been eliminated; this is a very positive plan, feature. b) The vehicular circulation system has been substantially modified to respect topography and recognize potential alternate alignments for Highway No. 41; also, a service drive along Highway No. 5 is indicated in recognition. of future upgrading to limited access standards. -. c) As part of an ecology study, the nevi, plan recognizes the park and recreational needs that may differ- through- out the development depending upon needs generated by various population col.ponents in differing housing types.! - 7. Statistical comparisons between the current plan and the previous plan are difficult due to the size and co;-iipl exi ty of the project and the el limination of any specific land use proposals for the western portion of the total area. it would seed, ho,il-Ver, that d„el l i ng unit density proposals have not been sir;nifica11 d t. � � al tereU, only tkle a•rraE�g`E't=ent o-. Or. t.ne groUEiG alas been Cil?1? ;"G, Pt'CGOSeC d`nSl tl �S and; a Jy "e ype is as .nd;,t' i.ec-I In the p 1Ca.iliS d�scrl -, ` a ape :�1: i J` i�rG'C �Ll"'P. A 8. Stage No. 1 or the first phase of construction (168 con- dominium units on 12 acres with a density of 14 units per acre) is essentially the same as originally proposed although the site plan has been altered substantially. The new plan seems improved and this density can be toler- ated for this type of housing unit. It must be noted, however, that our density analysis and recommendation is based upon open space and density considerations for the entire (175 acre) PUD area involved. It is essential that once started, this total area must be developed in accor- dance with the overall approved concept plan or a coor- dinated, revised plan which is equal to or better than currently being considered. If this is not done, future land use, traffic patterns, and open space considerations will become extremely confused and difficult to adminis- ter in the public interest. 9. Various questions have been raised in the past; our current comments on these are as follows: a) Traffic Apparently a traffic engineering study has not been conducted although we see no great problem associated with first phase development assuming Highway Department approval of temporary access onto Highway No. 5 as proposed in the stage development plan. Later, more intense uses, may, however, require such a study especially if spectator sports and similar uses are proposed again as in the past. b) Staging - The first phase of development should clearly indicate all construction (buildings roads, utilities, etc.) as may be planned and required within or out- side of the 13.80 acres of the actual project area. c) Plan Details - A fully dimensioned site plan is still needed for final plan evaluation for construc- tion purposes. d) Utilities - Apparently, the City Engineer still has a number of questions and recommendations to be considered prior to actual construction. e) Public Land - At some point in development staging, the public land areas and common green areas to be retained in private ownership must be determined and secured at some stage of total area development. Also, a decision must be made as to which areas are. to be dedicated .and which are to remain in private owner- ship; this in turn will affect cash in -lieu -of land dedication that may be required. 10. As noted in earlier planning reports, the plan as a "general concept" seems to have merit and would be in general conformity to the Comprehensive City Plan. Final approval, however, should be contingent upon several conditions as noted in the Planning Reports and the rouge draft of a PUD Permit presented earlier. ?2 vl Ic^ tU ;l Ott a) Th '' r)l an sh, ul d b2 thoroli h, e; "' a1 neC! i 0 file CGi l'.ii Si a' ��ce ,ee -, n'1 - r'/, I_ lu�r nra �: -F-�ip ul. I. i i.�ilg Gpui i:c;%i. sh,J (1... 0 `i Cai.ian d h- t' Coi?IE'I"1 Ss i0 1 Ei=?i e;'S "-r �- rdl n^ any aspects of -)'-he plan rt:11 c. 7 _ 'IL! T are 5 ..l l i3O"�. C I _ ��r',fO t' !Lit ; V �f hi _!er t0.�� If �t T i e aopl i �aiI L siiLaiu i ll �e I nipv'.,I: e'�� o f any addi t 1 oral data or i n f o ri-m. at ion tha' sh.0 d he sub, i ttec. c Re n s e '-o r 1 l Z e a r pores s; Gald b ,'eul �s d ro, a 1 Vi IGc-- depart menu s and others who ramie suggestions and/or recoi-n endatlons. d) +n order to proceed in an orderly fashion, it is recommended that a PUD Contract (long form) be drafted based upon my draft recommendation containing all conditions recommended and including the entire project area (Phase I development would simply be one part of one component of the Permit). This then would lay the ground rules for further pro- ceedings. It is important to remember that such a PUD Permit pertains to the land involved and thus also to any future land owners and/or developers. e) Summary'Recommendation . -fin o ? Ti On ! i ii ie T aria � � or', n f 11 � I ' ` /: 'G, 1 �:7 'Ie CiS 1. :7 `j _ J tii E1�% Caf1 Oe aLii'Ov e Lii 1 s -1 G e �? tii 1 j 2 0. S1.111 i,ar y se'vier avaiIabi ity. - tee - d ra - Ei � JA I D 1 t � I -f re l + J 4 0' l _ J� erl l i ti. f 1 }' 1 S f ons as necessa: y based upon 1 n p u t frog:' the :bove. -Establ ish;-,12nt o f a time - b 11 e or admii i n1 Stra zlVe procedure program for future public action on the PUD plan proposal. General Conclusion The revised plan has been considerably improves[ and seems acceptable as a general concept proposal vih i ch is i n general. conformity to the Comprehensive City __ Pian. Some questions sti I remai n unresoi ved , however, and publ i c approval of tfhi s project should be based upon the considerations note-d above. ".~'��=� '( •�/r 1. ' .�;�.� ` � � i of �"� k . 4� � :�c�,.... , � •�1.1 � 1. r�^,,�'�� .� �i Y� h'i fw`��"�t-f i,'�,'�,� / t. Sp INI A-V 76 �� w� ��• It.. ,y';�� o ti� '�� S ,Y,;� f „1t '�� t+l t �%>•\: �1j .:\�� ' �i(y��t// �f ' •� r 'r'! t!j' �, .sit (V �'`�" •", � , � j•' r, . /f��'t 1�, 1 � 4 / �.; ,;.; r�'ti, ,r;� ?y4(' x'1 p\ f �� -%= (j{�•F., 11;� 4,`•'�r; !. �jllYF}.. f•..frh'�.lf flit: r•r"k. I:t+al` - Mi� j� r�ri: i .``• `� �, +.tom _ �' t Y. r � ` ti�,',�,�•EJ� �r. ,�,d �.. �h. V�' tea,► � •t. C\ V z- NJ w CN 1p 21 �e��y �• � L'T -2015 1 It CUNBASSBN 'Ir.r I 1-i T-J.A� C3-:m 7610 LAREDO DRIVE • P. O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 • (612) 474-8885 DATE: July 1; 1974 FROM: Zoning Administrator TO: NORDSKOV SUBJ: Request for public hearing on proposed preliminary development plan PUD-2; Case of NORDSKOV REF: (a) Zoning Ordinance #47, Section 14.05, Subsection 3 through 4 b 1. In accordance with the provisions contained in reference (a), the following report is hereby submitted: a. Site in Relation to 'Surrounding Area and Uses: This particular site is zoned R-lA and the areas surrounding this proposed site are R-lY� except the area that abuts it to the north that is zoned P-2. The use that is being requested for this land by the developer is for multiple dwelling residence and commercial. It is Felt that this proposed land use does meet the City Standards. b. Proposed Land Use: The proposed land use will be for multiple dwellings and commercial. It is felt that this does meet with City land use standards. c. Population Density: One of the biggest problems this developer has had with this proposed development is the density. The density for this proposed development is still too high for cities like Chanhassen who want to keep their rural image. The density does not meet the accepted criteria for population density as it is too high for this community. d. Land Use Intensity: The land use intensity as shown in the plan will be intense but does meet acceptable standards. e. Existing Topography and Tree Cover, Buildings, Streets and Other Site Features: It is the opinion of thisoffice that officthat the City's Consultant Planner and Consultant Engineer should render comments required here. Page 2 f. proposed Public and Private Streets: The proposed street location within this project has been one of contention even before I became associated with this proposed development. It is my opinion that the City's Consultant Planner and Engineer dictate what is fea- sible for street location for this development. The second- part is the inadequacy of the highway systems that would serve this development (State Highway 5 and County Road 117) which we will have to live with until the State upgrades Highway 5. However, it is recommended that our Consultant Planner and Engineer submit to the City their recommendation as what is feasible for this development plan in regards to this problem. g. Open Space Proposed: In reviewing the proposed preliminary development plan it is felt that this plan does not provide adequate recreational grounds for such recreational activities as softball, football, and soccer. This plan was previously submitted to the Park and Recreation Commission in November, 1973, and they recommended at least two recreational fields for this development plus tot lots. Further, the plans show no access to the park along the north boundary of the development. This office is curious how vehicles such as garbage truck will get back their to pick up garbage. It is felt by this office that the developer and his planner are ignoring decent recreational fields because of the economic of them. However, the developer and planner are planning to house several thousand people in this development, consequently, the recreational areas do become a very serious item if we want to maintain the rural quality of life standards in Chanhassen. It is the opinion of this office that open space lands do not meet the excepted criteria for Chanhassen. h. Architectual Style of Buildings: This is a nebulous item at this stage of the proposed development but it is the opinion of this office that the exterior design of the apartment building is too gaudy of a design. It is recommended by this office that this city take a conservative approach to exterior design. 2. Zoning Administratarls Comments: It is the opinion of this office that the following problem areas will have to be recognized as they are major red flags to this proposed development: a. Density: The density for this proposed development is considerably higher than one would expect in a fringe suburban city. The City wants to maintain its rural setting and present quality of life. The question is if we want the quality of life that goes with a rural community, can we accept developments that propose this type of density? b. Park Area: It is the opinion of this office that not enough suitable land is dedicated for recreational use. Secondly; the access route to the dedicated park area needs a defined service .road for vehicles such as stated above. C. Street Location: It is the opinion of this office that the remarks contained in paragraph if are adequate. Page 3 Conclusion: Proposed preliminary plan approval is granted providing the developer and his planner can show that this plan will not affect the rural life style that this community wants to maintain here. Secondly, it will have to designate adequate recreation lands. Thirdly, the streets are a matter for the City Consultant Engineer to see that they meet excellent engineering standards. Further, this approval is subject to further recommendations from the City's Consultant Staff. LGS:k WILLIAM D. SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON JACK T. VOSLER JAMES R. ORR HAROLD E. DAHLIN LARRY L. HANSON RAYMOND J. JACKSON WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY JACK E. GILL FRANK V. LASKA -- SCH0ELL'& MAOSONNINC. ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS (612) 936-7601 • 50. NINTH AVENUE SOUTH HOP .KINS, MINNESOTA 55343 3uly 5, 1974 Planning Commission City of Chanhassen, Minn. c/o Mr. Lloyd Schnelle, Manager P. 0. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Subject: Review of Proposed Preliminary Development Plan, "Nordskov" Gentlemen: We have reviewed the planning documents submitted e document Midwest Planning in connection with the -above development, namely a 27-p g provisions. the land use proposed.and general layout, utility and drainage Although our study of drainage and utility provisions has been fairly com- plete,.the review herein is only that called for under Para. 3, Section 14.05 of Ordinance 47. DRAINAGE The First Phase, 12 acres, lies ear thishe lower subdivisioncisoadequatelye tributary area. Drainage through provided for in the form of a 42" storm sewer from the NW corner of the area to the south central area, including a small pond, and a 54" line to Highway 5. The existing culvert under Highway 5 will have to be supplemented, since it is 24" diameter. Local drainage can be adequately provided for by gutters and smaller lines somewhat as shown on the Utility Plan. ROAD ACCESS Phase One development proposes an access to Highway 5_ at the SW corner of the development, about 2,000' east of County Road 117. Provisions are made for the extension of a service road bordering Highway 5 eastward about 1,300' to a future access into Highway 5, when the next phase is developed. The proposed interior road arlatermdevel- ent appears adequate for the Phase One development being proposed; opments will include additional interior circulation routes. SANITARY SEWER There is no existing sanitary sewer trunk immediately available to this area. When it is constructed, the Lake Ann Interceptor will serve about one-third of the ultimate 175 acres in this total development by gravity; the area in Phase One can be pumped or possibly carried in a deep trunk sewer to the Interceptor when available. Construction of the Lake Ann Interceptor is controlled by the Metro Sewer Board and the Metropolitan Council. To date, the Council staff has recommended that no further interceptor construction be undertaken in the immediate future until areas now served by existing interceptors are more fully developed. There is a possibility that the Lake Ann Interceptor might be constructed SCHOELL & MAOSON.INC. , e 2 July 5, 1974 Chanhassen Planning Commission Page prior to the period described above if it were fully financed by the subject developer and others in the area interested in development; however, this will require some negotiation with the two metropolitan bodies before it can be assured. The interior sanitary sewer layout appears adequate for this development. The alternative of pumping sewage from this Phase One development either to the existing sewer in Burdick Industrial Park to the east or northward to the North Service area would involve excessive cost for "temporary" piping, about 8,000' of force main to they -east and about 11,000' to the north. Neither alternative is recommended. On -site sewage treatment would have to be of such quality as to be financially unfeasible. WATER SUPPLY Water can be supplied by extending the city trunk water system southward from Well House No. 3 on County 117 and eastward along Highway 5. An additional well will also be needed, as well as some minor modifications to the water booster station on 117. We have made no estimates of cost for this improvement, however it appears that committments for additional development in the area must be obtained by the City, so that payment of trunk water charges for Phase One and the other areas will adequately finance the water trunk and well additions. The interior water layout is adequate. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The submissions satisfy the requirements for Paragraph 3 of Section 14.05 of Ordinance 47. We therefore recommend your approval. 2. Further steps in planning for this development should include nego- tiations for financing the sanitary sewer and trunk water main construction noted above. truly -,-yours, CITY ENGINEER WDSchoell:sd Nordskov Land Development Corporation Midwest Planning & Research, Inc. LANIIA .,�►�,;tid 4826 Chicago Avenue So. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417 Phone: (612) 822 2100 u1y 17, 1974 u��+T_AL DENSITY ANALYSIS CHART ;=c^: City of Chanhassen, Minnesota ,repared by: Carl R. Dale, AIP Planning Consultant ,e .'al 1 owi n g i nformati.on is offered in the hope that i t will assist in z-c,e proper publ i.c evaluation of dens.i ti es". proposed for residential devel op- ent, �cnslty ^e Descri; tion Comments ; "aural" ' ..1 D".:U /Ac.. Quite commonly permitted.!in pas years arm and non -farm but now generally .considered inace— ,�;.ell-ing units not quate for many .reasons. ovidYd sanitary :;z,.ver or general rUan public ser- vices.) 1 D.U./2..5 Ac. Minimum lot area recommended for ade- quate on -site sewage disposal with good soil condition. 1'D.U."/5 Ac. Probably the most common or "popular" density requirement replacing the one '. acre requirement -of -years past. 1 D.U:/10 or. Considered highlry•desirable but 20 Ac. "experimental" and with some "finan- cial" problems. Note:. Above densities are now modified by flood plain and shoreland regulations as well as standards related to soil types, slope, watershed, and other standards and regulations. 3. Suburban 0-4 D.U./Ac. General single-family home development (Sanitary sewer service available cr available within S years - CIP - ) <:nd may include duplexes.' Includes a 4 ariety of lot sizes with most common being approximately 10,000 sq. ft. When permi 'ted, duplex structures normal ly rt:qui re 1 z normal lots. I I 1iid-Density 5-8 D.U./Ac. Typified by "patio homes" and town- houses . ilany units have been wilt at approximately 6 units per acre although many ordi nances perriii t up tc 8 per acre; market demands for open. green space, however, has 1 imi ted mos high density to the central cities :y and 1st tier suburban communities (onE project in Hopkins has 12/acre). r wiedium Density 9-15;D.U./Ac. Typified by It or walkup apart ments. These projects average in range from 12 to 15 units per acre with 15 per acre being the most commo; permitted high. Except in first tier suburbs.;:, projects of over 15 units per acre are not common. High Density. -15+ D.U./Ac. We consider projects of 15 or more units per acre to be "high density" justified in outlying areas only in certain instances when specialized housing is involved (retirement, luxury high-rise, etc. C. "Urban" It is quite normal for housing to ventral Cities and exceed 15 units per acre in the cen- Ist tier suburban tral areas of the Metropolitan Region communities - for a variety of reasons. There are also good and sufficient reasons why such densities are not built or per- mitted in more outlying areas. Notes W Evaluation of "green or open space "Gross" and "net density Other factors to consider 1. The method by which density is, calculated is important. The type of housing is also an important consideration. Also, there is the question of net vs. gross density. Some examples are as follows: a) If public streets are'included, the density quoted may seem lower than at first glance. In fact, the inclusion of private streets in density calculations gives an impression of lower density al- though this is now commonly permitted. b) Density is sometimes presented,as being low (especially in PUD's) by including all types of land u.se.including commercial; such gross density calculations can be meaningless and misleading. ;i 4 � d c) The inclusion of un- related or unusable "open space" can give appearances of lo,�rer density; often, tiie inclusion of paved space for parking is included to give.an even more exaggerated picture of iow density" a) The type of housing is important; for example, 8 single family homes on one acme wotuld be considered high density while over 20 units in a high-rise structure would not necessarily be con- sidered high or excessive.' e) Location can also be a factor;'•ti gher derlsi ti es might, for example, be encouraged near mass transit 'routes but discouraged in other areas for obvious reasons. It may also be appropriate to en- courage higher densities near major public open spaces. The above is intended as a "guide" only since each situation is unique and there are many and varying factors to consider. n 0 j CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE OF HEARING STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) Lloyd G. Sch.nelle , being first duly sworn, on oath deposes and says that he is and was on August 5 1 1974 , the duly qualified and acting City Clerk -Administrator of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date he caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of hearing on a Nordskov Preliminary Development Plan in the City to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mails with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer of Carver County, Minnesota , and by otnEr i appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 5th day pf j " August Ucaiird Lyman 841 exiole Lane Chaska, MN 55318 Carl Welter. Rt.5 Box 155 Excels. ort MN 55331 Mr. Ronald Lybeck #26 Carvers Green Chaska, MN 55318 Lake Ann Development Cotp�.-r. 5912 Holiday Way Hopkins, MN 55343 City of Chanhassen 7610 Laredo Drive, Chanhassen, MN 55317 ---- ------- Dale Green Sod Company L 'N i Rt. 5 Excelsior, MN 55331 Instant Shade PO Box 146 ' .,,I Chanhassen, MN 55317 State Highway Dept. 2055 North Lilac Dr.; Golden Valley, MN Mr. Dan Adams Nordskov Land Dev. Corp. 639 Melody Lane Naperville, Illinois 6Q504 J01 LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 639MELODYLANE NAPERVILLE, ILLINOIS 60540 312-357-0011 August 7, 1974 Mr. Lloyd Schnells Administrator City of Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota Dew Mr. Schnell; Though at the last meeting I indicated that we could consider a -.new plan for our laud which would reflect lesser density if the planning Commission would make specific recommendations as to what would be acceptable to them, the ensuing discussion indicated that perhaps other parts of the plan were also of a, nature that they too should be reviewed. Therefore, I have asked Midwest Planning to answer all of the questions that have been raised to date and to review the existing plan for the general public. It seems that to be presenting a new plan at a public hearing is in conflict with your ordinance. Mr. Howard Dahlgren of Midwest Planning will discuss the plan in the context of Chanhassen, of Mr. Dale's letter regarding densities, and of the Metropolitan area. He willalso answer all questions that might be asked at this hearing. In our opinion, our plan is feasible, financible, and sellable in the existing market. Should the Planning Commission not agree we would ask only for specific areas of concern and the basis for the disagreement. To spend large amounts of additional funds for a new plan without this discussion would, it seems to me, be of questionable-aa3.ae. I look forward to seeing you at the Public Hearing, and thank you again for your councel. Sincerely C�> Daniel W. Adams Nordskov Land Development Corporation cc: Midwest Planning James Penberthy PUBLIC HEARING PRELiIIiNARY DEVELOPMENT PLMT APdD REZONING RlA TO P2 NORDSKOV AUGUST 14 , 1974 , 7 : 30 P .P1. C. The public hearing was called to order by. Acting Chairman Jim Mielke. The following mettibers were present: Tim Stone, Mariana Shulstad, Jim Mielke, and Torn Gabbert. Dan Herbst and Nick Waritz were absent. The following interested persons were present: Bill Schoell, City Engineer Carl Dale, City Planning Consultant Russell Larson, City Attorney Mr. and airs. Donald Moore, 6675 Horseshoe Curve Terry Rosen, 6677 Horseshoe Curve Jim Penberthy, Monte 12, Box 1.52, Excelsior Dan Adains, 639 Melody Lane, Napierville, : llinois Roder Conham IIr . and Mrs. Ted Bentz, 7570 Chanhassen Rd.. Mr. and Mrs. Steve Upton, 7540 Chanhassen Rua Nellie Segner, 7530 Chanhassen Rd. Mr. and- Ilrs. Wes Arseth, 7520 Chanhassen Rd. John Segner, 7530 Chanhassen Rd. Jan Rannells, 6695 Horseshoe Curve Mr. and Mrs. Art "rnapp, 6697 Horseshoe Curve, II. R. Hegberg, 7415 Frontier Trail Mrs. Howard Bender, 2600 Arboretum Blvd. R. B. Lyman, 843 Oriole, Chaska R. K, Paxton, 7303 33rontier Trail Max Oel.schlager, 7410 Chanhassen Rd. Ralph Walsh, 7G00 Chanhassen Rd. Don Scllmieg, 7703 Erie Ave. 'Paul Rojina,. 220 W. 77th St. Irving Raymond, 7440 Chanhassen Rd. Air. and firs. Fred Oelschlager, 74.10 Chanhassen Rd. Jeanne Raymond, 7440 Chanhassen Rd. Mr. and Mrs. Michael Max, 7500 Chanhassen Rd. Mr. and Mrs. Harvey 'Parker, 7480 Chanhassen Rd. Mr. and Firs. Carl Wingren, 7335 Frontier Trail Ben Goweh,' 6440 Hazeltine Blvd. 1--like Sorensen, 7606 Erie Mr. and firs. 1). C. Weis, 6663 Horseshoe Curve William Schmid, 3651 highway 7 Joe McVey, 7510 Chanhassen Rd. Duane Hockhal. ter , 449 Pleasant View Road, Mr. and Mrs. Harlan Felker, 429 Pleasant View Road .Alyce IIockhalter, 449 Pleasant View .Road .Ir. and Mrs. Earl °IcAllister, 7510 Erie Par. and Irs. Vernon Zetah, 7500 Erie kL-. and Mrs. Sargent Palmer, 7608 Erie Bob Meuwissen, 201 1-7. 77th St. Sylvester Trutnau, Route ##5, Box 165, Excelsior Obed tie] om, Route 115, Box 24717, Excelsior George Ceiivak, Route #r'5, Box 252W, Excelsior Gene Reilly, M. B. Hagen Realty Daniel 8chaitberger, Route #`1, Chaska R. D. Weegman, Route ##1, Box 8211, Chaska William Brown, Route #1, Box 82F, Chaska Jim skibinski, Route #1, Box 82C, Chaska James Murray, Central Equities Nordskov Public Hearing, august 14, 1974 -2- Johan Neveaux William Donahue, Beloit, Wisc. Al Klingelhut.z Bernie Hanson, Chanhassen Lavin and Sports Kate Kelly, 114 sandy Hook Rd. Harold Lund, Erie Mr. and Mrs. Don Xing, 7200 Kiowa Circle Mr. and Pars. Dennis Olden, 7208 Frontier Trail Eugene Coulter Mr. and. Mrs. F. De Scott, Frontier Trail Ann Koltyk, Chanhassen Ann Danielson, 6607 Horseshoe Curve Hildred Coinri.ght, 365 Pleasant View Road Irene Strelnicks, Route 01, Chaska Jane Martinovich, 2674 Nightingale Court Ted Garva.i.s, 200 Chan View Pars. E.. Fe4ger, 7501 Erie Firs, Howard Dahlgren Ladd Conrad, 6625 Horseshoe Curve Howard Dahlgren, Midwest Planning and Research Jim Penberthy, Attorney for Nordskov, requested that after the close of the public hearing the Planning Colmniss.ion discuss and vote On the proposal because his clients.have to catch a plaine. The notice of public hearing as published in the official City newspaper was read by the Administrator. The 175 acres are located north of State Highway 5 and east of County Road 117. Howard Dahlgren, Midwest Planning and Research, gave the presentation. He stated that the plan presented does not necessarily fit exactly as you might envision Chanhassen today but Chanhassen has to plan for the future.. Higher density should be along the main corridors. An overall density of 10 units per acre is reasonable for a development in the center of the city near the proposed diversified center and proposed Highway 41.. Mr. Dahlgren then gave a slide presentation. Nordskov is requesting approval for 745 units on the easterly 80 acres at a gross density of 9.3 units per acre. Carl Dale, City Planning Consultant, reviewed his report of July 1, 1974. lie stated that in our opinion the general plan is in conformity to .the comprehensive plan for the cor�m'►unity. he recommended the Planning Cor►unissio,n give general approval to the plan but give himself, Russell. Larson, Bill Schoell, and others time to develop a permit with all of the conditions, and further analysis of the density to clearly outline in the permit and include the 175 acres in the permit. Then coma back to the next meeting with a permit outlining more specifically our recommendations for the conditions. Bill Schoell, City Engineer, reviewed his report of July 5, 1974. The developers have provided adequate drainage. The road access appears to be adequate providing they can get an entrance onto �-1 highway 5. At the present time -there is no scheduled time for the Lake Ann Interceptor construction. The City has water available but one more well on County Road 11.7 would be necessary. In order to make this a viable project there should be additional development in the area. The Cit l;s�+.r��zer has studied' this proposed development under Section 14.0 (3) of the Zoning Ordinance and recommends Nordskov Public Hearing, August 14, i974 _3- approval and further steps .in planning for the development should include negotiations for financing the server and water for the development. Carl Dale reviewed Don Berg's report of June 14, 1974. The Acting Chairman opened the meeting for coimtients from those present. Don Moore - What is the time lapse between each phase of the developmer and also what will this project do to the tax base? Howard Dahlgren - The overall staging of the development will likely take 15 years. The first phase is dependent upon our ability to get sewer connection. The impact on the tax base will be a positive. Jim Mielke -- Has the developer done a tax benefit study? Toward Dahlgren - No we have not. Ile can do that for you if you like. Harlan Felker - is there anyway this project can be started without sewer? Jim Mielke - No, it cannot. Jan 'Wingren -.What is the square footage For each type of unit? Howard Dahlgren - The apartments vary from one to three bedroom units. Square footage is from 800 to 1300. The Townhouses vary from 1200 to 1800 square feet. A motion was made by Mariana Shulstad and seconded by Tom Gabbert to adjourn the public hearing. Motion unanimously approved. Hearing adjourned. REGU"AR PLANNING COMt ISSION MEE^i TNG AUGUST 14 , 1974 The meeting was called to order by Acting Chairman Jim Mielke. The following members were present: Jim Melke, mariana Shull.stad, Torn Gabbert, and Tim Stone. Dan Herbst and Nick Wari.tz were absent. A motion was approval of made by Tim Stone and seconded by Tom Gabbert to -table the minutes until later. Motion unanimously approve . NORDSKOV PRGPOSED PREMMINAR'Y�PLAT AND REZONING: The Acting Chairman nents from t'.aC 1 ann ng commission, member. asked for coilu�. Tint Stone - It is awfully hard n.Qt to get caught up in the dynaxni.cs of Mr. Dahlgren's presentation. We know that today through the P4etropolit.an Council and their population is-ubjeats that we do not see great pressures for housing development particularly in this direction. one wonders about the specific need or merits of a project of this sort and its consistency with metropolitan planning. I am concerned with the tn:i x of housing proposed. The project could act as a catalist for commercial development alone High -way 5. My concern is that the commercial d development would not be consistent: with our generalized gleui.de plan. I have a problem with making A commitment to a development of this scale and size. J Pl.auning Corimi.issi on b1i.nutes., August 14 , 1974 -4 - Mariana Sbul stad - Tim has attore elaborately expressed my feelings than Y had intended. i am opposed to the two areas of coDwcercial development. We have an area whd-re we are encouraging commercial development now and are not encouraging other coramercial areas. 1 think this type of project i with 2500 people s i.nappropa. iate placed where it is. Tom Gabbert -- T could echo what Tim has said. T don't think we know what is going to happen 20 to 25 years from now. There is a sewer problem and road problem. T don't feel comfortable in approving something of this size with the uncertainty of the future. Jim Mielke - it seems we have expressed the same concerns continually to the developer as have already been expressed by Planni iig Co mission member; tonight. There are so many uncertainties here, the Lake Zinn Interceptor. When NAll that be scheduled for construction? We are on the threshold of promoting the commercial development in downtown Chanhassen. If we rezone land with connnercial farther out that would tend to drain away some of the initiative started in the downtown area. is this the correct timing for this development? A motion was made by Tian Stone and seconded by Tom Gabbert to recommend the City Council disapprove the application for rezoning to P2. Potion unanimously approved. The Planning CoiTani.ssion doesn't ree it at this point in time and based on the i.nfors�ation available -to the Planning Commission by other agencies and in doing other developments., it is in the best interests of Chanhassen that they do not make a commitment to this piece of property on this basis. Other agencies being Metropolitan Council, State Highway Department, Metro Sewer Boards plan. A motion was made by P4ari.ana Shulsi:a.d and seconded by Tim Stone to recommend the Council disappr6ve the preliminary development plan for the reasons stated previously and also for the reason that the Planning Commission has reconmtended denial of the rezoning and . the problem of no so aid economic mix of housing. Motion unaniviously approved. A motion was made by Mariana Shulstad and seconded by Torn Gabbert to recess the regular Planning Commission meeting until after the Lotus Lake Townhouses public hearing. Motion unanimously approved. PUBLIC HEARING PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND REZCVING TO P1 LOTUS LAKE TOIII41-10USES AUGUST 14, 1974, 5:30 P.M. ( The ptd3lic hearing was called to order by Acting Chairman Jim Mielke. The following members were present: Tom Gabbert, Mariana Shul.stad, Jim Mielke, a -ad Tim Stone. Dan Herbst and hick Waritz were absent. The following interested persons were present: Carl. Dale, City Planning Consultant Bill Schoell, City Ungi.neer Lotus Lake Townhouses Public Hearing, August 14, 1974 -7- Al Henderson There is plenty of land available for this development. High density should not be on the lake. 2 am opposed to the development. Harvey Parker -- You cannot appreciate the traffic problem unless you live on Highway 101. Until the highway problem is rectified S think it would be a mistake to go ahead with this development. Fred Oclach.1ager - x don't agree this is the right place for this large type of development. Let's have it somewhere else in the City. A motion was made by Tom Gabbert and seconded by Mariana Shulstad to continue the public hearing to September 11, 1974, at 7:30 p.m. The Acting Chairman asked persons present to send their written comments to the Planning Con nissi.on. REGULAR PLANNING COMf1ISS1ON MEETING AUGUST 14, 1974 The Acting Chairman reconvened the Planning Commission meeting. MINUTES: A motion was made by Tim Stone and seconded by Mariana Shulstad to approve the July 17, 1974, special Planning Commission (� minutes. Potion unanimously approved. Amend the last paragraph under NORDSKOV in the July 24, 1974, Planning Commission minutes to read: fir. Adams stated they would like to have the first 80 acres zoned and the remainder be left for the present. They will not go to single family on the 175 acres. Mr. Adams believes it would be the wrong place for it. New plans will be presented at the pudic hearing. A mot -ion was made by Mariana Shulstad and seconded by Tim Stone to approve the July 24, 1974, Planning Conmiission minutes as amended. Motion unanimously approved. :( "140 .DSXU_,. A motion was made by Mariana Shulstad and seconded by 5 one -Co amend the motion on the preliminary development plan made earl16—F-t-his evening to clarify that by adding specific reference to the lack of a construction schedule for the Lake Ann sanitary sewer interceptor. Plotion unanimously approved. OUTLOT 2 CHANHASSEN ESTATO. t Bob Mason and Gene Reilley mvners of Outrot 1, were present to cf;lscuss a proposed shopping center on this ten acre piece of land. They would like to have the location of the service road resolved. Planning Commission members received copies of the plan Tuesday evani 4juO would like more time for s tudy. . _. A motion was made by Tim Stone and seconded by Mariana Shulstad to table action until a time convenient for Mr. Reilley and Mr. Mason to meet -with the City Staff. Motion unanimously approved. HANBASSSN 7610 LAREDO DRIVE • P. 0. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 • (612) 474-8885 DATE: September 6, 1974 FROM: Zoning Administrator TO: Mayor and City Council Members SUBJ: Request for Approval of Preliminary Development Plan (PUD-2); Case of NORDSKOV REF: (a) Zoning Ordinance #47, Section 14.05, Subsection 4e ENCL: (1) Carl Dale's report dated October 11, 1973 regarding NORDSKOV PUD-2 (2) Special Planning Commission minutes dated Oct. 17, 1973 (3) Planning Commission minutes dated Oct. 24, 1973 (4) Park and Recreation minutes dated Nov. 13, 1973 (5) Planning Commission minutes dated November 14, 1973 (6) City Council minutes dated March 18, 1974 (7) City Council minutes dated March 25, 1974 (8) City Council minutes dated April 6, 1974 (9) Agreement between NORDSKOV and the City of Chanhassen (10) Mr. Don Berg's, USDA Soil Conservationist, report dated June 14, 1974 (10a) Zoning Administrator's report on proposed preliminary Development Plan dated July 1, 1974 (11) Mr. Carl Dale's report dated July 1, 1974 (12) Mr. Bill Schoell's report dated July 5, 1974 (13) NORDSKOV's site plans of July, 1974 brochure (14) Planning Commission minutes for the Public Hearing and regular meeting dated August 14, 1974 (15) lildlipsftoG/ 1?ddeAjou.✓1 Ta dr�srT/ a(td/ AVou /, /go 1. In accordance with the instructions contained in reference (a). Exhibit #1 is submitted to you for your action on the subject request. 2. The following documented information is hereby submitted for your review in taking your action on the subject development pla a. Enclosure (1) is Mr. Carl Dale's report dated Octobe 1973. This was Mr. Dale's first report on NORDSKOV developmen, after Midwest Planning took over as planner's for NORDSKOV. Page 2 b. Enclosures (2) and (3) are Planning Commission minutes pertaining to this development. c. Enclosure (4) are the Park and Recreation Commission minutes pertaining to the subject development recreation area. This proposed plan does not meet the Commission's requested requirements. d. Enclosure (5) are the Planning Commission minutes dated November 14, 1974. e. Enclosures (6) through (8) are the City Council minutes for your review. f. Enclosure (9) is the Agreement between NORDSKOV and the City of Chanhassen. It is important that you are aware of this agreement. g. Enclosure (10) is Mr. Don Berg's, USDA Soil Conservationist, report for your review. h. Enclosure (10a) contains the planning commission minutes for the public hearing and regular meeting of August 14, 1974, which are submitted for your review. i. Enclosure (11) is Mr. Carl Dale's report dated July 1, 1974. Paragraph 8 of this report are Mr. Dale's comments'�a.bout the density in Phase #1 could be tolerated. I think this density for this PUD-2 should be resolved at this meeting. j. Enclosure (12) is Mr. Bill Schoell's report dated July 5, 1974. k. Enclosure (13) is NORDSKOV's development plan and brochure dated July, 1974. 3. Zoning Administrator's Comments: After review the entire report which is contained herein, the biggest obstacle is the density that is presented in this development plan. I realize that economic dictate density but in my own mind the planner and developer are not being too realistic. I have mentioned to NORDSKOV and his planner that the density is too high for Chanhassen. or eljia r. - ,24 _ sJ WILLIAM D. SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON JACK T. VOSLER JAMES R.ORR HARDLD E. DAHLIN SCHOELL MAOSON, INC. LARRY L. HANSON RAYMOND J.JACKSON ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY / JACK E. GILL FRANK V. LASKA (612) 938 7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH - HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 October 25, 1974 Mr. Daniel W. Adams Nordskov Land Development Corporation 639 Melody Lane Naperville, Illinois 60540 Subject: Preliminary Development Plan Dear Mr. Adams: In an effort to."tie up the loose ends" on this submission, we will need revised drawings, the originals of which we received June 11, 1974, to show changes which have been agreed to by you. These new drawings should also be identified with a revision date so that they may be conveniently incorporated in the development contract. The changes are itemized as follows: "First Phase Site Plan" The temporary access you intend to provide to Highway 5, at the SW corner of this area, should be shown; the existing access located about 400' east of this point should be shown "to be deleted". "First Phase Landscape Same as above. and Dimension Plan" "First Phase Grading Plan" Final contours should be completed.and street grades added. "First Phase Utilities" It would be helpful, but not required, if the outline of streets and drained surfaces were delineated. The 39" storm drain in the west central area should be changed to a 42" pipe. An inlet from the undeveloped property to the west, in the west central area, should be pro- vided, with a CB at the junction point. Two addi- tional catch basins should be placed on the north side of the eastern garage in the southwest cor- ner of the property. The existing 24" culvert under Hy. 5 265' east of the southwest corner must be added to or replaced with a 54" culvert. At this time, before the culvert capacity is in- creased, some ponding will be caused in the high- way ditch but doubt that it.will cause damage to your proposed buildings, so that this culvert change under the highway may be delayed until other stapes of the development occur. In all other respects, the storm drainage design appears adequate. SCHOELL 8, MALDSON, INC. Mr. Daniel W. Adams Page 2 October 25, 1974 Consideration of this set of plans is scheduled for the Chanhassen coun- cil meeting on Monday, November 4th. We believe it will be helpful to your interest for these changes to be incorporated on identified plans to be sub- mitted at that time. Very truly yours, CITY ENGINEER WDSchoell:sd cc: Messrs. Lloyd Schnelle, Carl Dale, Russell Larson, Howard Dahlgren tvl October 25, 1974 19_ Nordskov PUD 2 IN ACCOUNT WITH CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECAP: Legal Engineer Planner Publication City Staff Labor Materials TOTAL EXPENSE Escrow monies paid to date BALANCE DUE as of 10-25- l 76 i0 LAREDO DRIVE o P: O. BOX 147 © CHANHASSEN,' NIIINNESOTA 55317 0.. (612) 474-3335 NORDSKOV EXPENSES INCURRED REGARDING NORDSKOV PUD 2 ESCROW FEE PAID 4-1-74 300.00 3-29-74 Russell Larson: Preparation bf draft agreement permitting r Nordskov to advance beyond sketch plan stage. 150.00. 4-6-7� '•` Special Council meeting relative to . Council action on Nordskov release from Council resolution. 50.00 200.00, 4-2-74 Russell Larson: Conference with Attorney Penberthy rela- tive to Nordskov agreement and zoning ordinance. procedures. 35.00 April Design Planning: Prepared and sent procedural material to Dan Adams. 1 hour 30.00 May Design Planning: meeting with City staff, and developer and Planner 21 hours 75.00 ESCROW FEE PAID 7-19-74 925.00.. 7-10-74 Russell Larson: Attend Planning Commission meeting relative to request for public hearing on zoning, prelim- inary plan and proposed development plan 50.00 7-17-74 11.Preparation of public hearing notice and arrange for publication 35.00 85.00 June Design Planning: Meeting.with City Staff and Nordskov 105.00 " City Staff,and Nordskov PUD plan Procedure 75.00 6-12-74 Review planning Commission agenda 30.00 6-12-74 Prepare for Planning Commission meeting 15.00 " Mileage 8.75 6-12-74 Attend Planning Commission meeting 25.00 253.75 July Design Planning: Prepare report on PUD Plan 45.00 " Prepare for Planning Commission meeting 30.00 " Attend Planning Commission meeting 25.00 " Report on density standards 22.50 " Mileage and xerox copies 8:29 130.79 8-19-74 Chaska Herald Public Hearing publication :0.77 W N ~- Page 2 ;NORDSKOU PUu 2 6-12,o7-5/74 Schoen & Madson Review proposed preliminary Development'' plan, and meeting with developer 8-14-74 Russell ,Larson: Attend Public Hearing and Planning Commission meeting on proposal August Design Planning: Meet with PUD planner 30.00 Prepare for meeting 30.00 8-14-74 Attend planning Commission meeting 25.00 Xerox copies 3.00 Mileage 4.83 CITY STAFF CHARGES 2-27-74 Lloyd Schnelle 4-6-74 5.13-74 " 6-3-74 II 11 7-1-74 " 7-10-74 " 9-6-74 II II' i 0--25-74 7-1-74 Karen Schneider 9-6-74 11 11 1 hour @ 7.64 meeting 7.64 3 hours @ 7.64 meeting with Council 22.92 iz hours @ 7.64 meeting 11.64 1 hour @ 7.64 meeting 7.64 6 hours report for planning C meeting 45.84 1 hour -.meeting 7.64 4 hours - prepare report for Council 30.56 12 hours - meeting 11.46 8 hours - typing and ass embl.ing'.report34.72 8 hours -typing & assembling reports 34.72 Xerox copies 109.00 Folders 2.40 709.50 52.50 92.83 326.18 9 9 L K 211 L SS ,. 0 VILLAG3M 7610 LAREDO DRIVE • P. O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 • (612) 474-8885 DATE: October 29, 1974 FROM: Lloyd G. Schnelle, City Administrator TO. Mr. Dan Adams NORDSKOV Land Development Corp. 639 Melody Lane Naperville, Illinois 60504 SUBJ: Submission of statement and establishing escrow fund. ENCL; (1) City Statement 1. Enclosure (1) is a complete itemized statement showing a complete breakdown of your bill with the City. 2. It is further requested that additional funds of $1,000.00 be established in your escrow account. ly XX `lgyd'6. T& 4eWG " tyAdministrator LGS.-k October 30, 1974 PLANNING REPORT For: City of DESIGN PIANOING ASSOCIATES INC. 4826 Chicago Avenue So. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417 PhoneMfb-222.1inC_1 COUNCILMEN COUNCILMEN COUNCILMEN COUNCILMEN CLK•ADM. 'i REAS. SST. ZONING -A BLDG. INSP. . WK. DiR_ Chanhassen, Minnesota PUB. PUB.UTILITY su:R. By: Carl R. Dale, AIP Planning Consultant Subject: Summary Planning Analysis and Recommendation - Nordskov of Chanhassen, Planned Unit Development Planninq Consideration 1. This matter was considered at some length and at numerous meetings including City Staff, Consultant, the Planning Commission, and others, The original plans for this PUD were generally considered unsatisfactory and, as a result, amended several times by the Applicant. In a report dated July 1, 1974, we stated our opinion that the plans had been improved considerably and that we could recommend the following: a) Concept approval for the entire 175 acres under general consideration. b) PUD zoning for the easterly 80 acres. c) Final development plan approval for the first phase of construction which would occupy the southwest corner of the 80 acre tract and planned for 168 condominium units. d) Various approval's recommended would be contingent upon a series of qualifica- tions and conditions to be developed for inclusion in the required zoning and development contract with the City. 2. Rather recently, the Planning Commission took formal action on -the matter and recommended that the project not be approved by the City Council at this time. We have made no attempts to comment upon the reasons for this denial recommenda- tion since such is the option and privilege of the Commission as a whole and as individuals. 3. Following action by the Planning Commission, we were asked by the City Administrator to finalize and summarize our recommendations as Planning Consultant for the City Council. Our response is that our opinion and recommendations are essentially the same as outlined in our .report to the Planning Commission dated July 1, 1974. Modified for current considerations by the City Council, our current recommenda- tions are as follows: a) The plan should be thoroughly explained to the Council at the meeting. The applicant should be questioned by the Commission members regarding any aspects of the plan which are still not clear or fully understood. b) The applicant should be informed of any additional data or information that should be submitted. c) Reports from all City departments and others who make suggestions and/or recommendations' -should be reviewed. d) In order to proceed in.ian orderly fashion, it is recommended that a PUD Con- tract (long form) be drafted based upon my draft recommendation containing all conditions recommended and including the entire project area (Phase I development would simply be one part of one component of the Permit). This then would lay the ground rules for further proceedings. It is important to remember that such a PUD Permit pertains to -the --land involved and,thus also to any future land owners and/ordevelopers. e) -Procedural Recommendations - - An opinion from the City Attorney as to just what can be approved at this time in the light of sanitary sewer availability. - Re -draft of the PUD Permit with revisions as necessary based upon input from the above. - Establishment of a time -table or administrative procedure program for future public action on the PUD plan proposal. f) The applicant has agreed to calculate dwelling unit density and utilize termin- ology as per o.ur recommendations in a report to the City dated July 17, 1974 and further to reduce somewhat the over-all proposed density as requested some time ago. Also, he has agreed to the inclusion of conditions in the PUD Permit that would leave flexible the ultimate development density which would be based upon future and changing market trends, suburban and Metropolitan housing policy, needs for specialized housing as may be needed, and similar market and public policy considerations. The projected density statement and condi- tions should be carefully and completely drafted for Council review and in- cluded in the PUD Permit. g) Some specific Permit conditions should be: 1. Building permits for any commercial activities would not be granted for at least five years and then only after specific authorization by the City Council. 2. Specific requirements for first phase development as outlined by the City Engineer which would include any and all conditions for erection of the first building complex. 3. Establishment of a specific time for public land dedication. 4. Conditions that will require a certain amount of on -site private recreation related to the population component (i.e. recognition of differing re- quirements for various age groups, income levels, family size, and the like) 5. A clear statement that the plan and procedure (for entire 175 acres) and all conditions apply to the land involved and will not be affected by any change in ownership, lease, subdivision, or lease arrangement. The general plan is valid only if all aspects such as traffic circulation, public areas, drainage, utilities, and so on are coordinated and related to a long-range development and staging program. General Conclusion The revised plan has been considerably improved and seems acceptable as a general concept proposal which is in general conformity to the Comprehensive. City Plan. Some questions still remain unresolved, however, and public app- roval of this project should be based upon the considerations noted above. Prior to final Council action, we would appreciate the opportunity to review and comment upon the draft PUD Permit conditions. 1. Date issued: i lage of Chanhassen, Minnesota PLANMED USI T 0EALOP ENT USE PERMIT Address: (Area known. as the Richard B.-Lyman Farm consisting o-r' - approximately 240 Acres. i Legal Description. The South West Quarter (SWY , the West Half of the Southeast Quarter (W z of SEA), The Northerly 66 feet ' of Government Lot 3, all in Section 10, and all that part of the Northwest (NWQ of Section 15, lying North .' of the center line of State Trunk Highway No ... 5; . Township 116, Range 23, containing 240 acres mor.e.,or. l ess ...Y. 7 Applicant: Nordskov Land Develcoment.Corporation Address: 639 Melody Lane, Naperville, Illinois Owner (i ► different from applicant)': Address: Zoning District: R-1A Permitted Uses:. , 1: ..A7l.uses permitted in the R-1A zoning district and suo`ject to the.: applicable'regulations contained in the Municipal Code.and further- subject.to the conditions of this PUD use permit; and. 2.' A-' pl anned unit development of commercial uses, mil ti -fami If dwellings accessory parking, open space, and others as,specifi- cally noted on the attached approved development plans, dated marked with the file and permit no. and duly signed by the Code Enforcement Officer. (Uses .permitted in the P-2 Planned Unit Development District as regulated therein and further subject to the following-. special Conditions or Restrictions as Imposed: All ;permitted uses shall be subject to the following special conditions or restrictions as imposed{ by'thi Village Council: General 1. All construction shal 1 be in compliance with all appl i cable codes nrd lord i nances of the V i 11 age of rhanhass.an except as mod i find S . i19l e f anii I v homes or or -her uses nermi tted i n the RI-A _onI ng di s .?'4 .ct steal 1 no b� devel oiled except i n the event- that sal d� uses a.'v I 1 steci aS porri i tted in. -Che LISC per mi -t`, or i n the event :.ha tiie Lis ? o?i-i-ni t i s modi fi ed or canc- I I ed i n oI e or in pa,(, by action of the Village Council. 3. lore detailed and complete site and building plans imay be required iron ti,m,e-to-t1me as development- proceeds �:rithin the project area in accordance with the approved stare developiaent program. 4. T e conditions of this permit are applied to the land -involved and shall not be affected by any subsequent sale, .lease, subdivision, or other change in ownership status except as noted herein. 5. Any requests for major deviation from the approved .plans 'shall require a public hearing and consideration by.the Village.Council. The Planning Commission shall determine what is "Major"._ 6. Where there are particular difficulties or unnecessary hardships resulting from the application of the strict. letter of the.con- ditions of this PUD Use Perm -it, an appeal may be made and a variance may be granted as provided -for in themunicipal code of the Village of Chanhassen. 7. This Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission and Village-, Council once each year and may be modified, extended, or cancelled in whole or in part based upon considerations affecting the,public- health, safety, convenience, or general welfare. C0MP0?IENTS a. Land Use Component Description: A Land Use Component shall setting forth the distribution, location land devoted to each category of land use General Plan of Development.. Requirements: cons st..of a map or` maps > and extent of the. acres of proposed as part of. the 1. Only these uses listed herein as permitted and.or as indicated on the approved plans shall be provided for on the site. 2. Land uses permitted shall be located, constructed, occupied, and maintained in accordance wi th the. provisions, of this permi.` and approved plans made a part of this normit. 3. Hajor and significant rieviations from the approved ��'Iiaai.s shiall require an amended permit prior to issuance of building perm-i is . 4. to'ses peri,ii teed i n the areas des i gnated for coymi,,erc i al sisal 1 be those permitted in the P-2 Zoning district; as noted on tho !?0'1'0Vnea" s i to plans . O thel" uses proposed -i n z to iUt� r� thc. t would ., �"1 1,1 ! i� .� 1 �.) S P 1 "� i 7•:I I t "t ih .L. !' a t 1, 'he J- G di s t (h e i. S h a 1 (- ! ii i s ";? ., oll I b�% c1 2ihC1Gl3i1t CO ii"i S i i?nner] {ln'i t dC''ie tor-leti' caCh chase of cons true .loll o f r a' l i n units i s itereby granted Conc;ep- a ---ova i only ard, bu .l cli ng p2t'iiii is shal l tlo"L be iSSCieu liltil d�:ailed Site piaill S aI'e Subiiiitteel for rev ie':1 by tile; Piarning i3Ol;iMliSSion and approved by the ';i ilage Council. Concept approval a this tuna pertains only to general Land use and not to site an details nor types or number of dwelling units b . Circulation Comoonent 7escription: A Circulation Compon�n_t shall consist of a' map or maps, - setting f orta the location and extent of all transportation 'faci 1 i ti es proposed as part of the General Plan of Development. Requi rements 1. Parking lots and drives shall be surfaced and concrete curbing installed as directed by the Village -Council. 2. Plans and specifications for any access drives, private or public_, streets, or:ut.ilities to be constructed by .the developer must be approved by the Village .Engineer. The developer shall. al sa supply. -..- the Engineer tvith any other data, plans, or as-builts that he may require.. 3. Adequate or other any and right-of-way as requested by the County, Village Engineer, governmental agency shall be dedicated as requested for all public right -of- way needs. 4. Title to all right -of -bray and easements shown plan must be provided to the Village prior to building permit. 5. Al'l utility installation and layouts must be' Village Engineer prior to construction. on'the development the is"ance of a .: approved by the 5. All parking and drive areas must be of'a bituminous or'concrete material and the method of installation of said drive and parking areas must be approved by the Village Engineer. 7. Concrete curbs must be provided on the perimeter of all parking and drive areas. S. Traffic routes For tho hauling of rnat.ori ills , carth rind bui 1 di ng eglli Piilt•'_itt to Wnit Y'Otti tit(i s i to, tlnd tht, 'i:'Imo of -,aid haw1 i (f�j be approved by the Village Enclineor prior to the "iSSUance o17 a bLii I I . peril t. 9. D _evel opmen�, o l stage No. 1 of this pl aimed unit developinent sisal'i riot be permitted until such time as the County, the State Hi"gh- way Department and the Village have arrived at a sol u .ion to -all potential traffic problems in this area. • ...._________.r � ) li i a 4l �7 17 �.0i;i�o n � y? L • 10'l, A PoLi1a n ",lDana'?� Slaii con% -a n � 'e - 4 1 1 4 t_ J L L -.'n 0 f the standards of pope i at i on deilsi ty and blii t : ng or iie va• Iolis propoosed 1 and uses il: i Uii's rig 2S �l i;�a LDS C i "e api_I I atl on r ?arac t2rl S l c,s, and C4latige ?11 till n the pi ? ntled :y core" 1 { a au w i i h the of ler L01„p0an t t5 offile General Plan o eve1 opi-:len t. T he supporting data shaI I i n c I ude, bu t not be 1 iia i ted dwL, Zing (housing) units per acre for the various residential LIses proposad; and square footage by type for the ',arious non- residential f acili ties including sufficient. data to calculate traffic. generation, parking requirements, water consumption, se,rlage neecs. and t`?.- necessary capacity .of related utilities and services traditionally rendiel- ed by public or private organizations- for a population of such V size as is projected for the completed, planned development. Requirements C5 1. Tile number of dwelling units by type (number of bedrooms) shall be i as specifically authorized and noted on plans to be submitted. for review.and approval in later stages of dev elopment. 2. AIt' this_time, approval is given only to the land use concept = v proposal wi th respect to multiple family development. Building.- permits for construtcti on of multiple family. dwellings units shall be subject to submission of more detailed plans, review by the K� Planning Commission, and approval by the Village Council. kr 3. Conditions applied to the future issuance of building permits r shall be added to and made part of this- planned unit .special :use P C permit. _ d. Subdivision Design Component ' Description: A Subdivision Design Component shall contarn a� de'scriptive ,.*' statement -..of the principles'-governing:the proposed subdivision of land including lot design for.various,proposed land.uses. This Component shall be in sufficient detail - so that it can serve -as'the basis for determining the conformity of any site' plan to the General Plan of Development. , Requirements: 1. No part of the development shall be sold or otherwise transferred' from single ownership except under terms of an approved sub- • division. 2. The common areas, nor any portion thereof, shall be sold or 01-1,herw•iso transferred from control of approved dome O,lnors Associations or other approved control except as inay be permitted by an amendment to this Permfi t, 3 ffect of Minimum Area Requirements of Conveyed Lots or Building Sites in the event any real property in the approved PUD permit .i s conveyed in •tg-tal or in part, the buyers thet>eof shall be bound _ y the provisions of the Wl permit and thi G} hh! Development G..n constituting a part thereof; provided, however, that :'oth.. �srain shall be cons truid to. Crea ; _ non -conforming lots, bui ! u . n sites, buildings or uses by virtue of any such conveyance of v lot, building, site building or dart of the deileiopment create:.' p°ursuar" to and in con f ormancs with the PUD permit. Subsequent structural. additions or alterations may be made provided the provisions of h e PUD permit, Zoning Ordinance and other applicable Ordinances are adhered to. 4. it is hereby noted that approval of the general plan of development constitutes preliminary subdivision approval and public hearing requirements for said approval have been met. all final sub- divisions, however, shall require approval by the Village Council which -shall make a determin-at-ron--if the final subdivision plans are in substantial conformity to the approved General Plan of Development and the subdivision component of the planned unit special use permit. ; e. Services and Facilities Component Descriptian: A Services and Facilities Component shall contain a map or maps setting forth the general. location and extent of. 'any and all existing and proposed systems for sewage, domestic water supply and distribution, refuse disposal, drainage, local utilities and rights -of -way, easements, facilities and appurtenances necessary therefor as well as a detailed statement describing the proposed ownership, method of operation, and maintenance -of each such, service, ' and . ,faci l i ty. Requirements: I. (Recreation use areas, pedestrian trails, buildings, common -open space or parking sand other joint facilities.) - Certai n,�,l and areas and structures are provided within the pi.'anned unit development for private recreational use or as service facilities.. .The owner of such land.and buildings shall enter into an agreement with the. Village to assure the continued operation and maintenance to a pre_ determined.reasonable standard. These common areas maybe.placed under ownership of one of the following depehding which is.more appropriate and as may be approved -by the Village Council... a. Dedicated to public where a community wide use would be anticipated. b. Dedicated to public as a special assessment district or easement: C. Landlord control. d. Landowners Association, provided all of the following conditions are met: i. The Landowners Association must be established prior to any sale. 11. Mombership must bo wandatoc y for eachlowner, and any successive buyer. 111. The open space restrictions must be permanent, not for a given peliod of years. -5-• ;.1e Assc,Ciai.i0n n u Si J e t e s p o n s i 1) 1 F r 1 iab', t tt� inSura e local taxes , and i.}te main%enance of r?sideni,ial 'and L?-th,.i• i aC l i l %i ?S , e?:Ce ]% a i i0di l ed oy t'rle Ui l l age %dlatiC i '_and.0•ti6lners must pal C,he i r prd ra (;a .sh re o ; t. i-,- c0i-3 t an 1 t. h.� aSSes5--'?nt i"VIed by }ie aSSOCI3tido ilt"ti Caii b2CG"i2 a is?i1 Cif -'l-.-e proper y. 'ice. the Association 1USt be able to adjust the assessment t to meet changed needs. 2. Landscaping, as per the approved plans, shall be completely installed around each principal building following its completion. The entire area around each principal bui 1 di ng 'shal l be completely landscaped within 210 days following the completion and occupancy of that building. _--_---- 3. Landscaping shall be properly maintained and replaced if damaged or lost by.winterkill, drought, or other causes. This condition shall apply to existing trees and other landscaping proposed to. be retained. 4. Easements for utilities or other purposes shall be provided as .' requested by the Village. 5. Provisions for sanitary sewer; public water,.surface' :eater drainage, and other utilities shall be made as required by the Vill.age Engineer. 6. Easements or other provisions -for pedestrian or other trails to be part of the comprehensive trail system shall be provided as directed'.. and approved by the Planning Commission. f. Construction Order Component Description: The Construction Order Component shall contain'a map or'.`: maps setting forth thesproposed chronological order of construction relating each proposed use.and structure and to the construction of th'e "—' various services and facilities as may be required 'herein. Said Component shall include estimated completion dates and shall specify. the proposed order of request for utility release or other authority to occupy completed s.truc Lures so as to provide a basis for -determining' - the adequacy of the related services and .facil it'ies for each',"separate construction phase. Requirements; }�7 1A -Iln s ' sL /- Lo Nd I ,— i J N.f PIE !v j4,E ,z" 1, All public and private development shall proceed in accordance with . an approved stage development program and no building or other construction permits sl all be issued except 'in accordance with said prograiii. agi ncl shall tie as ipprovod by the Village Engineer and Code 3, TIIa t part o I the plan indicated as being Phase No. 1 shall not be granted building permits until such time that final and detailed plans and specifications have been approved by the Village COLInCil. Construction on Phase No. _ shall not commence until plans for sanitary s2we'r, road access, and other area ;tide considerations have been ?pai'OV2u by the Village OUnC i in sufficient detail to assure proper staging and coordination of all pubic and private 11dition!1 Cormoor.ents Description: The General Plan of Development may include such other Components as Need is indicated by the nature of the particular proposed development. Requir ements: .1. Trash, garbage, wastes, and other refuse shall be 'stored and dis posed of in the manner as indicated on the approved plans. 2. 3.. Exterior storage of wastes, junk cars, boats,'camper units, and other miscellaneous storage other than normal, approved vehicular parking shall be permitted only if specifically authorized by conditions of this permit. No identification, rental, advertising, directional, or -other. signs shall be permitted except those specifically authorized by the Code Enforcement Officer and shown on thi approved plans as part of this permit. 4. Dwelling units, commercial buildings, or other structures shall not be occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the Village. S. Interior and exterior.fire prevention, warning and other safety features shall be installed and maintained as directed by.the.nire Department and.Code Enforcement Officer. Any appeal to said requirements shall be made directly to the Village Council whowy, cT alter the requirements and said alterations shall be made part of ` - th.i s permit. 6. Accessory uses such as party rooms, day -nurseries=, and the.like small be permitted only if specifically,authorized and listed as a permitted use in,this permit. 7. Bonding to Assure Conformance to General Plan of Development and Agreements. To assure that any improvements specified as part of the General Plan of Development (or necessary as'a pre -requisite to a btility release) are completed under the terms of said plan or each phase as outlined in the Plan or in any agreements executed with •tha Vri 1 lagn Council according nq to the provisions of this Permit, the applicant shall post a corporate surety Frond, cash bond or other guarantee for the faithful performance of the work or'agreements and the payment of any casts to the Vi1lago In a sum equal to the total as recommended by the Code Enforcement Officer and Village Engineer and approved by the Village Council. Furthermore, prior to certification of the Site Plans required by this Permit, the Me r n'i o'rc2iii2i`t.-. Officer and Village -Engineer shall also determine : a amount of corporate surety bold or cash bond shall cover each s2parate facility', landscaping, or utili ty'rec;uired a5 part of each phase of development as outlined in the approved Use Perms and in the General Plan of vevo i opment, as the case may be; provided, that part Of the corporate surety born or cash bond may,be released when any specific ?art of each phase is completed, upon recommendation of the Engineer and the approval by the Village Council. 8. Prior to occupancy of any dwelling unit, a fee of'$50.00 per unit shall be paid to the Village for recreation area needs created by the. development. Said fees, however, may be refunded in total or in part provided it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction:of the Council that all normal neighborhood type recreation facilities for the population served have been provided on -the.site,. Generall'T -accepted standards for -the provision of recreation sites and facilitie will be utilized.to determine the extent to wh.ich.recreation requirements have been met. In any.event,'all proposed recreation -areas and facilities shall be% as indicated on th.e approved plans..- 91 All -development and uses shall be subject 'to annual Anflection .by;... the Vi hl age fore purposes of assuring continued conformity .to - the .; . provisions,of the permit. -. 10. All structures and grounds shall be properly and well maintained at all times. 11.: Land uses permitted shall be located, constructed,•.occupied, and maintained in accordance with the provisions of: this perm'i t::and approved plans. made part of this permit. 12. All maps, .reportV and other documents attached to. thi s-'permit which'' .are properly appr ved and filed shall be considered' a� ~a part.of ;`:.-. :'.this -permit and shall have the same force and effect as if fully, : set down herein and are hereby made a part. of this 'perm.i.t;v _ I3. Security lighting shall be installed, maintai neh"7 and operated as.,v , directed b-y. the Code Enforcement Officer: 14. Special precautions as directed by the Village Engineer and Code Enforcement Officer shall be taken both during and after construction to assure against the following: 1. Silting from grading or any other source or cause. t. Erosion (windor water). 3. Pol 1 tlti on of any type. 15. ,'All conditions recommended by the Village Engineer attached . herato and approved by the Village Council are a part of and conditions to ;:;pia parmit. ,. -8- ADDENDUM REPORT NORDSKOV OF CHANHASSEN A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA Midwest Planning and Research, Inc., Planners November 1, 1974 NORDSKOV OF CHANHASSEN A. ACREAGE BREAKDOWN PER TYPE OF USE 1. Residential Mid -Density (5-8 D.U./Acre) 36.7 Acres Medium Density (9-15 D.U./Acre) 52.6 Acres High Density (15+ D.U./Acre) 32.6 Acres 121.9 Acres 2. Commercial 13.3 Acres 3. Park 23.7 Acres 4. Roads 16.4 Acres 175.4 Acres B. UNIT -POPULATION BREAKDOWN *Net Densities Westerly 93.5 Acres Acres D.U./Ac. Units Peo:le/D.U. Po,ulation Mid -Density 18.7 7.0 131 2.8 393.0 Medium Density 8.1 11.0 81 2.2 186.3 Medium Density 9.3 9.0 83 2.2 190.9 Medium Density 7.2 12.0 86 2.2 197.8 High Density 19.6 15.0 294 2.2 676.2 Park 12.1 SUB -TOTAL 75.0 N/A 675 2.4 1,644.2 GROSS DENSITY: 9.0 D.U./Ac. Easterly 80.1 Acres Mid -Density 18.0 5.4 97 2.8 291.0 Medium Density 16.0 11.0 176 2.2 404.8 Medium Density 12.0 14.0 168 2.2 386.4 High Density 13.0 15.0 195 2.2 484.5 Park 11.6 _ SUB -TOTAL 70.6 N/A 636 2.4 1,566.7 GROSS DENSITY: 9.0 D.U./Ac. TOTAL 145.6 N/A 1,311 2.4 31210.9 GROSS DENSITY: 9.0 D.U./Ac. *Net density calculated as per Plan Proposal 04 PLAN PROPOSALS 1 . It is anticipated that within the high density areas some units may be used for specialized housing that would be appropriate at the time for the market. This would include housing for the elderly, nursing and retirement homes, 'empty nestors', low and/or moderate income and other similar forms of housing. 2. The actual form of housing to be constructed will reflect current suburban housing demands and policy. 3. The actual type of housing and density in any particular section shall remain flexible. It should be further understood that the density figures specified herein represent maximums and it remains the option of the developer to consider lower densities in the future depending upon housing type, demand and financing programs available. 4. In the planning and processing of the site plans for each of the sections, there should be included appropriate common area and recreational facilities based on demonstrated need appropriate to the projected occupancy of the site. Calculations as per Residential Density Analysis Chart forthe City of Chanhassen, dated July 17, 1974 prepared by Design Planning Associates, Inc. Net Density: Calculated by land area occupied by residential housing only. Gross Density: Calculated by combining residential areas and park areas.