The URL can be used to link to this page

71-01 Woodhill SUB PUD pt 1�' STATrEMENT villacE Of chanhassenBOX 147, CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 56317 TELEPHONE 474-88S TO: F4C Kenn Construction -------------------------------------- 1550 Northwest Htghway No. Suite #217 — - - -- I Park Ridge -- ---- - - - - -----� . Illinois 60068 DATE DESCRIPTION TR FOR CONSULTANT FEES ON YOUR PROPOSED D AMOUNT DUE 8-22-Planning DEVELOPMENT. g -- Planners Fees arson -_ Legal Fees347.50 apers __ Hearing notice 530.25 26.76 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $903.91 WILLIAM D. SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON JACK T. VOSLER JAMES R. ORR HAROLD E. DAHLIN LARRY L. HANSON RAYMOND J. JACKSON WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY JACK E. GILL FRANK V. LASKA KENNETH W. MILLER Village of Chanhassen c/o Mr. Jerry Schlenk, Clerk P. 0. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minn. 55317 SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC. ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS -7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 August 21, 1973 Subject: Review of Revised "Preliminary Plat" of Gentlemen: Woodhill Subdivision, Rev. dated 8/7/73 The developer, McKeon Construction Company, has concurred with our suggestions noted in the report of June 25th, except that involving the realignment of the intersection of the stub road which enters Chanhassen Estates at 80th Street. This suggestion, that the interior subdivision road be aligned straight north and south and 80th Street come in at a 90° angle, was made to provide a little discouragement to through traffic between the two areas. We continue to believe it is desirable. Most importantly, the McKeon Company has agreed to substitute their construction of the remaining 500' of frontage road from the NE corner of their subdivision to Dakota Avenue for the construction of a slip lane in the SE quadrant of 5 and 101. The latter would be done by the Highway Depart- ment under such an arrangement. We have been in contact with the HD several times within the past several days, but Mr. Bill Crawford, Acting District Engineer, has been on vacation and no definite answer has been given. Mr. Brown, Bill's assistant, says that the arrangement appears "feasible" but that no commitments can be made until Mr. Crawford returns next Tuesday. We recommend your acceptance of this preliminary plat, subject to con- clusion of a firm agreement with the Highway Department to construct the safety improvements at 5 and 101, and further subject to the minor realignment of the 80th Street stub, and to the items noted in our June 25th report. Very truly yours, VILLAGE ENGINEER WDSchoell:sd DESIGN PLANNING ASSOCIATES, INC. 4826 Chicago Avenue So. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417 Phone: (612) 822.2106 August 20, 1973 For: Planning Commission and Council Village of Chanhassen, Minnesota By: Carl R. Dale, AIP Planning Consultant Subject: Planning Analysis - McKeon Construction PUD Plan as Revised August 8, 1973. Planning Considerations 1. This current plan is the latest in a series of revised plans presented to the Village over the past five months. An earlier plan was voted on by the Planning Commission at the July 24th meeting; a tie vote resulted on a motion to approve the plan subject to ten (10) conditions. Those voting against the motion apparently desired to have further response from the Applicant prior to voting in favor of any approval motion. 2. As part of the process, a series of Planning Reports has been prepared by the Planning Consultant as well as the Village Engineer, Village Attorney, and others. It is believed that many points raised by these reports are still valid. Concerning the ten (10) conditions noted in the July 24th Planning'Commission minutes, the following is noted: The plan has been revised substantially in accordance with the conditions noted in the motion with some minor exceptions. The revised plan contains 502 dwelling units rather than the 499 suggested. A major improvement is that of providing a total "buffer" area of public open space and single family homes between the more intense development and Chanhassen Estates; along with the landscaping recommendations, this should be an adequate and proper buffer/screening area. Other condi- tions noted by the Planning Commission would be in the form of written statements in the development or PUD Permit or "contract" (preliminary rough draft prepared by Planning Consultant earlier). 3. The new revised plan indicates an increase in usable park land from 4.32 to 28.29 acres plus 20.99 acres of lake and marsh; the Parks and Recreation Commission should give advice as to how this area should be maintained, developed and utilized. They should also consider if any part of the open space should be maintained under a home owner's association rather than being dedicated to the public. PLANNING REPORT -2- August 20, 1973 Village of Chanhassen, MN. 4. Some earlier concerns which still seem valid are as follows: a) Better than average landscaping should be required in the higher density areas (especially the apartment sites). As indicated in earlier reports, landscape plans submitted to date are not adequate to serve as the basis for evaluation of potential land- scape quality. (See report dated June 22, 1973.) b) While the over-all general or "concept" plan seems adequate, more detailed plans should be required by stages prior to issuance of building permits. c) The stage development plan should clearly indicate the phasing of all public and private construction (Construction Order Component of PUD Permit). 5. If the general plan of development is approved at this time, the rough draft of the PUD Permit should be restructured and expanded to include recommendations contained in the various reports and received from various groups and individuals. These include but are not necessarily limited to the following: a) Ten conditions noted in Planning Commission minutes of July 24th. b) More detailed plans and specifications to be required for the first stage of construction including landscaping. c) An approved street lighting system. d) Additional soils information by stages of development. e) Controls on traffic entering the Chanhassen Estates area as recommended by the Planning Consultant, Planning Commission, and Village Engineer. f) Approval of the proposed home owner's association by-laws, articles of incorporation, and covenants -conditions -restrictions by the Village Attorney. g) Specific precautions to be taken against erosion (from wind or water), silting, pollution, and other problems both during and after construction. h) Assurance that the builder use quality materials and design. i) All single family home lots to be developed as part of Phase I construction. j) Others as deemed appropriate and required in the public interest. N Summary The new revised plan is considerably improved over previous submissions and could result in a satisfactory living environment. Much depends, however, upon the adequacy of plan detail to be submitted later under terms and conditions of the PUD Permit to be drafted in final form. AUG973 VILLA,01t 1),# r �HANHAssr IN N 3. (:0 DESIGN PLANNING ASSOCIATES, 4826 Chicago Avenue So. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417 Phone: (612) 822 2�g August 20, 1973 For: Planning Commission and Council Village of Chanhassen, Minnesota By: Carl R. Dale, AIP Planning Consultant Subject: Planning Analysis - McKeon Construction PUD Revised August 8, 1973. Pla_n_g Considerations 1. 2. Plan as This current plan is the latest in a series of revised Plans presented to the Village over the past five months. Ans earlier plan was voted on by the Planning Commission at the July 24th meeting; a tie vote resulted on a motion to approve the plan subject to ten 10 voting against the motion a ( ) conditions. Those to further response from the Applicantypriiorntlerto votingein favor of any approval motion. As part of the process, a series of Planning Reports has been prepared by the Planning Consultant as well as the Village Engineer, Village Attorney, and others. It is believed that many points raised b 10 y these reports are still valid. Concerningtheten (nwinin the noted: July 24th Planning Commissionminutes, thefollo The plan has been revised substantially1inaccordance with the conditions noted in the motion with some minor exceptions. The revised plan contains 502 dwelling units rather than the 499 suggested. is that of providinga total buffer areaJOf improvement open space and single famil public intense development and Chanhassen Estates;etweenthe alonmo grwith the landscaping recommendations, this should be an adequate and proper buffer/screening area. Other condi- tions noted by the Planning Commission would be in the form of written statements in the development or PUD Permit or "contract" (preliminary rough draft prepared by Planning Consultant earlier). The new revised plan indicates an increase in usable park land from 4.32 to 28.29 acres plus 20.99 acres of lake and marsh. ' the Parks and Recreation Commission should give advice as to how this area should be maintained, developed and utilized. They should also consider if an y Prt of the be maintained under a home owner'saassociatonpratheren cthanould being dedicated to the Public. PLANNING REPORT Village of Chanhassen, MN. 4. 5. M. August 20, 1973 Some earlier concerns which still seem valid are as follows: a) Better than average landscaping should be required in the higher density areas (especially the apartment sites). As indicated in earlier reports, landscape plans submitted to date are not adequate to serve as the basis for evaluation of potential land- scape quality. (See report dated June 22, 1973.) b) While the over-all general or "concept" plan seems adequate, more detailed plans should be required by stages prior to issuance of building permits. c) The stage development plan should clearly indicate the phasing of all public and private construction (Construction Order Component of PUD Permit). If the general plan of development is approved at this time, the rough draft of the PUD Permit should be restructured and expanded to include recommendations contained in the various reports and received from various groups and individuals. These include but are not necessarily limited to the following: a) Ten conditions noted in Planning Commission minutes of July 24th. b) More detailed plans and specifications to be required for the first stage of construction including landscaping. c) An approved street lighting system. d) Additional soils information by stages of development. e) Controls on traffic entering the Chanhassen Estates area as recommended by the Planning Consultant, Planning Commission, and Village Engineer. f) Approval of the proposed home owner's association by-laws, articles of incorporation, and covenants -conditions -restrictions by the Village Attorney. g) Specific precautions to be taken against erosion (from wind or water), silting, pollution, and other problems both during and after construction. h) Assurance that the builder use quality materials and design. i) All single family home lots to be developed as part of Phase I construction. j) Others as deemed appropriate and required in the public interest. Summary The new revised plan is considerably improved over previous submissions and could result in a satisfactory living environment. Much depends, however, upon the adequacy of plan detail to be submitted later under terms and conditions of the PUD Permit to be drafted in final form. RE CEIVEI) f� MINN.. �tt� DWIGHI' C. ADAMS ATTORNEY AT LAW 799 ROOSEVELT RD. BLDG. 4, SUITE 106 GLEN ELLYN. ILLINOIS 60137 469.6540 August 1 1 • 973 Mr. Russell H. Larson Chanhassen Village Attorney 1900 First National Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Re: McKeon Construction's "Woodhill" Planned Develo ment Dear Mr. Larson: CNICAOO OFFICE i 1 t W. WASHINGTON 8T. SUITE 1517 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS MI 6.1fi66 This will confirm that I have arranged for copies of the land plan to be sent to the various consultants and a Pursuant to the re subject Council will have sufficient hinformation frome. full agencies consultants and agencies so the Y� the Village and arrive at a decision at the Au all of the various y may study the plan completely August 27th meeting. McKeon Construction has proceeded in Upon the fact that the propert good faith and in reliance ys ment, pursuant to the Petition ofthe prdesent landPlanned Development Company. dis- turbing to McKeon Construction that McKeon sPlans are it is extremely as Petitions for Rezoning rather than a Plan submitted ineaco ante with the current zoning on the propert good faith belief that the reasonableness of the accord- Y• It is McKeon's the only issue, rather than whether or not the concept be the approval of the residents of Chanhassen p meets with understandable that the surrounding residentsswould •Op poses Plan that did not provide for single familyp any Opposition is neither fair or reasonable in light but such the property was zoned P-2 prior to the development fact that Estates. Chanhassen rd Page Two Mr. Russell H. Larson Chanhassen Village Attorney August 14, 1973 McKeon's plan, as presently submitted, certainly must be deemed a reasonable use, subject to some modification, that the City Council may deem necessary after full review of the plan. It is, once again, pointed out that the present plan has been re- . vised four times and presently is 6o% below the maximum density allowed under the P-2 Ordinance. -In addition, the McKeon plan has a density of 25% less than the "Prestige" plan which was previously found to be acceptable. McKeon Construction has spent a great deal of time, energy and money in the preparation of its plan and is committed to proceed with this development. It is hoped that McKeon's development of. the property can be done with the assistance and cooperation of the Village of Chanhassen and within the framework of their jurisdiction, rather than having to get involved in litigation. McKeon Construction feels that a development which reflects both the views of the Village and the Developer would be preferrable. to one which reflects only the views of one side. Accordingly, McKeon Construction hopes that a plan which is satisfactory to all concerned can be achieved. Thanking -you and the Village for the excellent cooperation McKeon has received,,I remain, V'ia ry truly yo, r s�, I DWI T C . A`D S, Attorney for M ON CONSTRUCTION DCA:maz cc: Mayor Village of Chanhassen Mr. Joseph LaFromboise McKeon Construction Mr. Frank A. Martin McKeon Construction Mr. James Wiley Kirkham -Michael 2 G KIRKHAIVI IEL ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS August 14, 1973 RE: Woodhill Subdivision Chanhassen - McKeon KMA B730465. Mr.. Harold L. Peterson Riley -Purgatory Creek Watershed District 8950 County Road 4 Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 Dear Mr. -Peterson: We have been requested.by the Mayor and Village Council of the Village.of Chanhassen to forward to you the latest revi- sions to the proposed McKeon development in Chanhassen. Very truly yours, KIRKHAM, MICHAEL & ASSOCIATES James D. Wiley, P.E. JDW/brc encl. cc: Village Clerk Mr. Dwight C. Adams 14 1 o .> ALIG-1973co 0 to VILLAGE OP CHArINAg EN, 7601 KENTUCKY AVENUE, NO. • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55428 • 612-425-5777 Chanhassen Planning Commission July 24, 1973 Recommendations to be considered for inclusion into a motion for approval Of the McKeon Company-Woodhill Subdivision Preliminary Development Plan. 1. It is recommended that townhouse units 14, 15, 16, 17 & 18 (Phase I) be eliminated and replaced with no more than 3 single family residential lots, that townhouse units 71, 72, 73, 74 & 75 (Phase IV) be eliminated and replaced with no more than 3 single family residential lots and that townhouse units 83, 84 & 85 (Phase IV) be eliminated. These changes will result in lower over-all densityny�0> , provides for single family residential lot buffer with adjacent residential area and will provide both more green space and better accessibility to green spaces. 2. It is recommended a natural boundary be developed between Woodhill Subdivision and Chanhassen Estates in the area north of Lot 9 (Phase I) to Highway # 5 right of way by leaving an earthen berm which should be effectively landscaped with tree and shrubbery plantings. This natural screening should be detailed in the developments landscape plan. 3. It is recommended that the developer leave an earthen berm between the new service road and existing Highway # 5 along the north edge of the development and that it be landscaped with sod and shrubs. 4. It is recommended that Phase I include the construction of the service road along Highway # 5 from Highway # 101 to the northwest corner of Chanhassen Estates. -2- 5. It is recommended that Aprartment Building #5 (Phase II) be relocated into the area currently designated as commercial. The commercial should be relocated into the area currently designated as Office area (Phase II) which should be deleted from the plan. The new commercial area should be included as part of the last phase # IV. 6. It is recommended that 80th street extention be built but that it be temporarily blocked off with a chain barricade during the construction of Woodhill Subdivision and until the service road along Highway # 5 is completed. (See C. Dale planners report of 6/22/73.) 7. It is recommended that prior to the start of Phase II townhouse con- struction, a storm sewer pipe (size and type to be determined by Village Engineer) should be installed by the developer to run from the western entrance of Woodhill at Highway # 101 easterly to the head of the ravine in Woodhill Subdivision. Appropriate water run-off protective measures and construction should also be installed within the ravine at that time under the direction of the village 8. It is recommended that the developer of Woodhill Subdivision work with the Parks & Recreation Commission of Chanhassen during the excavation phases of their development in order that active play -areas, ball fields, etc. be economically constructed with fill material from the project. 9. It is recommended that McKeon Construction Co. submit to the Chanhassen Village Council a documented written reply to the following reports and letters: (1) Village Engineers Report - June 25, 1973; (2) Village � �y -3- Planners Reports - April 23 & June 22, 1973; (3) Vill Letter - age Attorneys June 26, 1973; (4) Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District Report - Jul 2 Y , 1973; and (5) Site Plan Review by U.S.D.A. Soil Con- servation Service - May 24, 1973. 10. It is recommended that the development plan extend over --___ years With Phase I to be completed y b/,�� ..� % The final development 1-77 Plan is to be submitted by jo? /3% RuSSELL H. LARso2v ATTORXEY AT LAW 1�J00 .FIRST NATIONAL $ANx ]3.r ING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 July 3, 1973 Mr. Franklin A. 1 artin President, Midwest Division �'IcXoon C'onstruction P- C- Sax 597 1550 Tjortawast aighway Park.,idge, Illinois 6005$ Rey � -oor' 1--ill Subdivision -.-car .r. lv_, rtsn , '"d=o Tillage C ouneil "as WOPosed ,"Food Hill geed to meet with you Concerns Pr$sent ';" �u�fvfsion On Tuesday, July 17 at g; 0 p. vos of the Plannfng �`ommisston and the I`uxic & �� recreation Commission of the Village ill also lye in at this meeting. attendance Very truly Yours , Russell H. Larson C]� . a3+d$Sen illage .a.ttorney cc; Gerald , „Calenk .%s ` 12 3yt$, ti ' 3 ow- 40 TELF-PHONE 335 - 95" JUL 1973 REcelveo O VILLAGE OF CyANHASS,cc. \1n. MINN% _. Riley- Purgatory Creek Watershed Distri 8950 COUNTY ROAC EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55 July 2, 1973 Village of Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 ATTN Mr. Gerald Schlenk RE: Woodhill Subdivision - McKeon Construction Gentlemen: The Board of Managers of the Riley -Purgatory Creek Watershed District has reviewed the plans for the above referenced development and have the following comments: 1. The flood plain adjacent to Rice Marsh Lake is at elevation 879. A portion of Phase IV of the development is within the flood plain. Before filling or the construction of buildings and roads can proceed below elevation 879, addi- tional contour information showing final ground contours must be submitted to the Watershed District for approval. 2. The Phase I storm sewer plan indicates that the intermittent drainageway which flows through the center of the develop- ment will be maintained in its present condition to carry surface runoff to the marsh surrounding Rice Marsh Lake. The existing drainageway is steep in many places and the increased runoff will cause erosion of the drainageway. The drainageway should either be protected from erosion through the use of properly designed riprap or a trunk storm sewer pipe should be used to carry the storm water runoff to Rice Marsh Lake. The revised storm sewer plans should be submitted for Watershed District approval. 3. The final grading plan must include a sediment control plan to insure that sediment will not be washed into the marsh surrounding Rice Marsh Lake during the construction of the project. The sediment control plan could include a system of check dams or low berms to hold surface runoff and allow sediment to settle. A surface restoration plan for providing vegetative cover for the distrubed areas of the development should also be included. The sediment control plan should be submitted to the Watershed District. 00, Village of Chanhassen If you have any questions, please contact us. Sincerely, July 2, 1973 Page 2 BARR ENGINEERING CO. Allan Gebhard AG.:ps cc: Mr. Frederick Richards RILEY-PURGATORY CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Mr. Conrad Fiskness BOARD OF MANAGERS President Date: JUL 9 1973 r, RUSSET-1- H. LARSON ATTORNEY AT LAw 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIs, MINNESOTA 55402 June 27, 1973 Mr. Gerald W. Schlenk Village Clerk Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Woodhill Subdivision Dear Jerry, Please arrange to have copies of the attached letter forwarded to all Council and Planning Commission Members as soon as possible. Thank you for your cooperation. RHL: m Enclosure Very truly yours, w J� Russell H. Larson Chanhassen Village Attorney TELEPHONE 335-9565 RusSELL H. LARSON ATTORNEY- AT LAW 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANU BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE 335-9565 June 27, 1973 Village Council Village Planning Commission Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Proposed Preliminary Development Plan, Woodhill Subdivision, McKeon Construction Dear Council and Commission Members, Following the public hearing of June 26th relative to the above matter, Mr. Frankin A. Martin, President, Midwest Division, McKeon Construction, requested the opportunity to meet informally with the. Council and Planning Commission in a working session during which McKeon representatives would specify in greater detail the proposed development of the Woodhill Subdivision and respond to the questions and suggestions of the Village representatives. As noted, the objective of the meeting would be to afford both parties the opportunity to explore in depth all aspects of the proposal. If the Council and Planning Commission agree to the proposed meeting, Mr. Martin has expressed the wish that the meeting be held prior to July 24th on which date the Planning Commission proposes to take action. Please give this matter your very early consideration, and if the suggestion is acceptable to you please select a convenient date for the meeting. Mr. Martin advises that he would be available at any time. Ve - _ truly yours, Russell H. Larson Chanhassen Village Attorney RHL: m cc: Franklin A. Martin RLTSSELL H. LARSON ATTORNEY AT LAW 1900 ,FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 211, 197- Village Council Village Plz-nning Cornmtssion Box 147 Guz--i aassen, "'irnesota. $57?. TELEPHONE 335-9565 L: Preliminary c _ . iopment Platt, oodaill S ivision on Constrt: ction ar Council &Ad C A. Sion :."embers , FAIT ing Ca public hearing of ,dune 26ti, relative tO file Lbove r.A tter, l:-r. rrankin . Aiartin, -resident, idwt.st Division, .cKeon Construction, requ-steel file opportunity to meet irlormally witia the Council and Planning Con;mission I a wort im. session during waich McKeon representatives -auld specify in greater detail -::. )roposed development of tree Woodbiii �ubdivisivn and - -pond to the qu - tiDns card su_ gestions of tine Tillage represent ti A;. not , _'.a O'AcCtive of :s,e meeting woul_: be to . oot.a . arti0,s tile opport:: I.y to explore in a ti, all aspects of tare prongs 1. If the Council and Planning COMmission agree to tree proposed meeting, .,,:. ... artin has expressed the Wisr, that the meeting ;u_ 401d prior to July 24ta on whica date the Planning Commission propose-: to t ke awtion. Please give this ? � atter your very early consideration, c4nd if t1w suggestion is acceptably. to you *abase select a convenient date f%)r the meeting. Mr. blartin _"vi.:es that he would be availa;:J , at any time. eery try ussell Larson sen Village Attorney RHL:m cc: Franklin A. Martin bcc: Gerald W . Schlenk R.USSELL H. LARSON ATTORNEY AT LAw 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE 335--9565 June 26, 1973 Planning Commission Village of Chanhassen P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Proposed Preliminary Development Plan, Woodhill Subdivision, McKeon, Construction Gentlemen, In accordance with established procedures, I have reviewed the proposed preliminary development plan of Woodhill Subdivision, a proposed P-2 Planned Unit Development district, and dated June 22, 1973. My report is as follows: PRELIMINARY PLAT Blocks 4 and 5 of the proposed plat consist of single family lots. The proposed preliminary plat does not show side or rear lot utility easements. If these are to be required, they should be shown on the plat. The design feature requirements of Section 7.03 of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that street widthes and the square footage of single family lots be shown. STREETS The private streets shown on the proposed preliminary development plan should be constructed to Village street standards. Concern has been expressed that 80th Street will be used for ingress and egress to the area from Chanhassen Estates. This is a very real concern of the residents of that area, and consideration should be given to some alternate street arrangement. Planning Commission - 2 - June 26, 1973 PUBLIC LAND DEDICATION The Village Planner has recommended that the public land dedication at Rice -Marsh Lake should be accomplished at an early stage of development. I agree with this recommendation, and I suggest that the dedication take place upon approval of the final development plan if such approval is to be forthcoming from the Village Council. DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS The developer has submitted to me for review the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions governing its Stoneybrook Development in Brooklyn Park.. These declarations provide for the formation of a non-profit corporation to which would be delegated and assigned the powers of main- taining and administering the common properties and facilities included within the project. I assume that identical declarations will be employed in the proposed Woodhill Subdivision. If such is the fact, I find that the declarations are satisfactory. It is unclear whether the single family lots will have access to the common open area spaces, and a statement should be made by the developer on this question. CONDOMINIUM OWNERSHIP The developer has submitted a declaration establishing a plan of apartment ownership for the Stoneybrook Condominiums in Brooklyn Park, and I presume that an identical declaration will be employed in this project. The declara- tion complies with the Minnesota Condominium Act of the State of Minnesota, and establishes a plan for the individual ownership of the real property estates consisting of the area or space contained in each of the apaztments in the multi -family buildings and the co -ownership of the common afeas and facilities utilized by the apartment owners. DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT The Village Planner has submitted a proposed planned unit development use permit setting forth proposed special conditions and restrictions relating to the development of the project. It is recommended that the format of the Planner's permit be employed in the preparation of the development contract, supplemented by such other conditions and restrictions as seem pertinent. SUMMARY The proposed development plan as now submitted, including the materials transmitted under date of June 22, 1973, appears to meet the filing requirements of our ordinances. My report does not attempt to deal with the broad planning and engineering considerations which must be taken into account by the Planning Commission in actin u on the proposal. Very ly you.9,, 1#9 RHL:m ludssell H. Larson Chanhassen Villacre Attorney WILLIAM D. SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON JACK T. VOSLER JAMES R. ORR HAROLD E. DAHLIN LARRY L. HANSON RAYMOND J. JACKSON WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY JACK E. GILL FRANK V. LASKA KENNETH W. MILLER Planning Commission Village of Chanhassen P. 0. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Gentlemen: SCHOELL & MADSON.INC. ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS (612) 938-7601 - 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH - HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 June 25, 1973 Subject: Woodhill Subdivision, McKeon Construction Co. Review of Revised Submissions A Preliminary Plat and six additional drawings showing preliminary layouts for the above area.were submitted for review last week. We met with Messrs. Wiley and Coleman of Kirkham, Michael, engineers and arch- itects for McKeon, and Messrs. Reichel, Lyle Peterson, Robinson and Howe of the Minnesota Highway Department on June 15th in regard to theneed for reserving some right-of-way width for the future widening of State Highway 5. The highway department people indicated that reserving a space extending 184' from the - center line of present Highway 5 would allow adequate width for future four- laning and the construction of a service road. The recent submissions take this criterion into account. ROADS AND DRAINAGE The land use arrangement plans indicate a 26' wide ser- vice road along the north side of the tract near the'pro- posed multiple dwellings. This is in accordance with Highway.Department space requirements. This service road abuts "Phase II" of the development, in the northeast corner. We suggest that the multiple in that area be included in "Phase I" so that the complete service road can be built initially, and an attempt made to have the State Highway Department complete the remaining 500' of service road construction down to the present —Chanhassen Estates access point. If this is done, funneling a major portion of the newly -generated traffic from this area can be accomplished more easily than will be the case if the stub connection to 80th Street is the only access to the east. We also recommend a slight rearrangement of the intersection of 80th St. and the easternmost street in the subdivision so that 80th will come in at right angles and a 90' turn will be necessary to turn onto or off of 80th. The drainage pipe and structures proposed appear slightly remote from sev- eral large areas which will generate high runoff: the parking and garage areas for the two multiple structures in the northeast corner. Extension of the lines' shown can accomplish adequate drainage. Further study should be done when detailed street profiles are submitted. SCHOELL & MAOSON.INC. Planning Commission Page 2 June 25, 1973 Village of Chanhassen SANITARY SEWER AND WATER Some minor modifications of these layouts may be made when final building arrangements are deter- mined. We repeat the previous comment that construction of these lines will greatly benefit all residents on the south side of Highway 5 by firming up the water transmitting capability and providing an alternate source, should the existing 8" line now serving Chanhassen Estates give trouble. RECON MEN DATION: We recommend your acceptance of this general preliminary plat, subject to the comments above, and to refinement of the plat dimensions relating to roadways and drainage easements. Very truly yours, VILLAGE ENGINEER WDSchoell:sd cc: Mr. James D. Wiley, P. E. DESIGN PLANNING ASSOCIATES, INC. 4826 Chicago Avenue So. Minneapolis, Minnesota 56417 Phone: (612) 822-2106 June 22, 1973 PLANNING REPORT For: Planning Commission Village of Chanhassen, Minnesota By: Carl R. Dale, AIP Planning Consultant Subject: Planning Evaluation--Revised,McKeon Construction PUD Plan (Note: Also see Planning Report 'dated .April-23, 1973 and as.revised May 25., 1973 plus suggested draft of PUD Permit Conditions) Planning Considerations 1. A revised.plan,has been submitted•plus additional information as requested by the Planning Commission at the meeting `of June 5, 1973.' The only basic change i n ' the ,site .pl.an is that of . moving the Phase III apartments away from the Chanhassen Estates Area to a site near the•proposed commercial area. The apart ments have been replaced with five patio home buildings. This is a good change and greatly reduces the possibility of land use conflicts. 2. The revised plan indicates the platting of the nine (9) single family home lots in the first phase;, actual construction on - these lots should be required prior to granting permits for phase II construction. While there may be a desire toincrease the number of single family homes to the same number as in'the earlier Prestige Plan, the value of this for improving'the land use relationships between McKeon and Chanhassen Estates is questionable; the patio homes will resemble large,single-family homes and present added green space due to the site orientation. It is, however, a matter of judgement and should not greatly affect the McKeon Plan in either event. 3. Earlier reports have indicated the need for better than average landscaping- especially in the higher density apartment areas with particular attention paid to screening at the edge of the project.. Plans submitted to.date are not adequate to serve as the basis for evaluation of potential landscape adequacy and quality. While some additional detail has been provided for the first phase of construction, it is still rather general and consists primarily of a tree planting plan plus 7 I-) some shrubs and hedges. There is no indication of a landscape "design" plan which might include large rocks, gravel or wood chip beds, or similar plan details or specifications. One measure of quality to be expected might be to view existing McKeon developments in the Twin Cities and apparently this has been done by some members of the Commission. It.is highly recommended that a degree of design excellence be expected and required and'that no building occupancy be permitted until adequate plans have been submitted and approved. (Also see requirement for proper landscape maintenance in draft.of PUD Permit.) -- -- - 4. Some concern has been expressed over potential traffic from the McKeon Project entering the Chanhassen Estates area. The follow ing comments are offered: a) Traffic from McKeon onto Dakota lane and then onto Erie Avenue should be rather insignificant and be no more than could be normally expected on a typical minor residential street. b) While traffic information has. been submitted, it is still difficult to estimate what the actual traffic movements might be as they will affect 80th Street and then Erie Avenue. While it would appear logical to extend 80th from Erie Avenue into the McKeon Project for better and safer "neighborhood" circulation, potential traffic problems could be alleviated as follows: 1. Do not open 80th for general traffic until the service: road access along T.H. 5 is completed. This wild substantially reduce the number of vehicles using. 80th as access to the McKeon area., In the Anterim,:80th could be graded foremergen,cy.use only (chain or other obstacle implaced to prevent general traffic use). 2. After opening of the T-.H.'5 service road, open 80th on a trial'basis to determine if problems develop; if so, revert back to emergency'.vehicle use only or close it permanently. 5. The proposed homeowners association by-laws, articles'of.incor poration, and covenants -conditions -restrictions seem adequate and should be filed as part of,the PUD.Perm.it conditions with any. subsequent changes.requiring.Village.approval as a condition of the Permit. The Village Attorney should:, however, g,i ve his, opinion as to the following: a) Is the wording for collection of Association assessments adequate to cover all potential' public costs. For example, does the term "taxes" include potential" -.public improvement assessment costs such as public road improve- ments, storm water drainage district costs, -and the 1ike? k,. b) Are provisions adequate to assure coordination of trail use, open green space systems, and the like between the apart r ments and patio,home areas and ownership arrangements? 6. Soils information'submitted indicates no building problems in th first phase of construction. Further information should be re- quired for each subsequent.phase of construction as development proceeds due to potential problem areas noted at previous meetings. 7. Some form of public street lighting should be required; this may well be provided as earlier indicated by gas lights or other types of fixtures in private yards or. common green space areas. 8. Page No. 9 of the draft PUD Permit notes precautions to be taken against erosion, silting, pollution, and similar problems both during and after construction. 9. As indicated in earlier reports, the net residential density is quite high in some areas; net apartment density ranges from 12.29 to 20.08 dwelling untis per acre although the total project rg oss density.is 6.51 units per acre. The gross density does, however, include the park area which contains 20.99 acres of water and marsh plus 4.32 acres of usable park land. 10. The new (revised) plan ,has apparently eliminated None patio home building,due to the change in Phase III'apartment location to reduce the number of dwelling units from 549 to 545. Summary As a "concept" or general plan, we would still agree that it has merit and is not substantially different from the. earlier Prestige Plan. It is our opinion, however, that the developer ha`s not fully demonstrated, in detail, the pot,en,tial quality of the -intended environment. Our particular concern has to do with the higher density apartment areas although the landscaping plans seem rather "we`ak",.for the entire project area. It is suggested, however, that these are details that can be worked out assuming agreement by tfle developer that a high degree of site design quality is possible in a project of this type. It might be possible at this time to consider concept approval and finalization of a PUD Permit with conditions that will require later approval of plan details which are still in question. It may even be possible to proceed towards construction with"building occupancy permits being issued only after approval of final plan, detail by stages. June 20, 1973 Chanhassen, Minnesota Planning Commission Members Chanhassen, Minnesota Please read a copy of the attached petition signed by the residents of Chanhassen Estates rejecting the proposed development by McKeon Corporation that is currently before your committee. Certainly, if you override this petition and recommend this development to our council, we hope you will incorporate the changes set forth in this petition in your recommendations. The people of Chanhassen Estates solicit your support. Thank you. 1973 � C yANA�' OR n i _ M �A 3LrN� _+�4y June 7, 1973 Chanhassen, Minnesota r' We.th r .undersigned, as taxpayers o.f Carver County and residents of "the Viljig:a of Chanhassen, do hereby petition the Planning Commission of Chanhsasen reject the proposed development by McKeon Corporation locaf0d '86utheast.of the intersection ofhighways #101 and #5. We further petition that if the planning commission% decides to override the wishes of the taxpayers Arid_aecept the developers plans',.that these plans be altered and/or`modified in ,the following manner: 1) Provide access to the development from the Northeast corner (ta provide service roads and access roads from highway #5) as spelled out in the original re -zoning of the land. 2) Relocate Apartment building numbered 1,20 on their proposal to ..t the western edge of the development. 3) Relocate Apartment building numbered 4,5,on their proposal',to the West of Apartment building numbered 6,7,8; to provide,a buffer zone and a recreational area between the new apartments and existing. single family.dwellings. 4) That the single family lots, Down as numbers 1 thru 10 on-the, proposed plan, be developed prior to or simultaneously with Phase 1 of the development; Also, that these homes are compatible, in value to existing homes on the western edge of Erie Aire, 5) That the. -single family lots be increased to coincide with the'' original approved plan as presented by Prestige Corporation in. June.of 1971. This would provide a:greater buffer between existing. single„family homes and the greater density of population .n..the new development. 6) That the new development includes adequate landscaping which will enhance the value of the development and beautify the terrain, 7) That -the new development meets all existing, codes and ordinances of the Tillage of Chanhassen. 2 5- 06 9 Y '0"?, f/4 5. fi,Aa• �� Fes? 6. atv �'%}i5,, ��M:F JJ1;�;i�g{y ' V ... �i 14•. IZe 4 .42. � -� 1543, �o 170 18. 46. i ot 20 • -In' �© 21:I11..(/1� . a41,. 1 22. • Are 50. 23 . ci 1 /alr ) 4 �•it , `;� 21, VAS 53 z6j2 71 27 ,OP-&-7 - 556, 30 • �c 8. 31 • !� 3tj Vie,: 32. .60. 34. 35. • LU 37. 5. 07 ( Q 9 7. r 40 ... ✓11r r i 1 68. 9 \A MEMORANDUM - U'CHANHASSEN McKeon Construction Co. Plat June 16th, 1973 A meeting was held yesterday at the GV Hy. office and attended by Messrs. Jack Reichel, Lyle Peterson, Mike Robinson and Earl Howe of the MHD, Jim Wiley and Tom Coleman: of Kirkham, Michael and the writer representing Chan- hassen. Attempt was made to see whether some dimension less that 270' from CL of present traveled highway.(No. 5) to the.usable portion of the McKeon plat might be determined. First it was determined that the RXX back lot lines of Lots 3 and 4, Block 25, Chanhassen Estates Second Addition, are 250.861 from the highway CL. From the old memo in 1970, this was to allow for a future double eastbound lane south of the present roadway at 70' ctrs, a future service road at 75' ctrs, and an additional space of 80' to the future -right-of-way line, making a total of 225'. Apparently the extra 25' was put in for possible changes that might be required due to the grade of the land to the south. The Highway Department people now feel that, as a minimu%, still allowing. for the additional future roadways noted above, the distance from the CL of the present roadway to the right-of-way line can be reduced to 184'. This results from narrowing the center island between EB and WB roadways to 30' between shoulder edges, and a 30' allowance between shoulders of the future EB and the service road.. They will go along with a 26' wide service road, as they have in Edina, although they usually asked for a 32' wide service road, so that parking can be allowed on one side. (In our opinion, there should be no parking on ;such a service road i.f it is to/serve its proper pur- pose. We are sympathetic•to the McKeon Co. desire to use as much of its land as possible, and still maintain somewhat the same building arrangement as it first submitted. With the above in mind, Wiley will send in a sketched sec- tion , a cross-section, of the roadway as. it will appear through the area where the present gradeis highest, and put his parking area curbing ones foot out from the 184' dimension. He will also show a 10' grass strip be- tween the parking area curb and the service road curb, so that at least a 10' radius curb curve can be provided into his parking area. names of the Incidentally., I could not find in the file the/original people with whom Adolph and I discussed the 250' dimension. Discussion with the HD people indicated that they do not expect to put in any additional lanes on No. 5 in the next: ten years. They felt that some im- provement might be expected at the No. 101 crossing in the way of traffic control, signals, etc. but made no committment'nor do they have any plans for such. They feel that raising the load limit on the two existing lanes to 9T can be done merely be adding one overlay. :They recognize the need and the obvious demand for such improvement. We indicated that we believed any grade separation between 101 and 5 prob- ably should occur at the east boundary of Chanhassen, one mile east of the present 101 crossing, which conforms with the preliminary roadway layout of Eden Prairie. In view of all the above, we want to alter our recommendation on the McKeon plat to allow for a future R/W line at 184' from the present Hy CL, with a service road to occupy part of the 184' space. %1(1 June 7, 1973 Chanhassen, Minnesota e the undersigned, as taxpayers of Carver County and residents of the Village of Chanhassen, do hereby petition the Planning Commission of Chanhassen to reject the proposed develo ment b. McKeon Corporation located Southeast of the intersection of highways #101 and #5.._ We further petition that if the planning commission decides to override the wishes of the taxpayers and accept the developers plans, that these plans be altered and/or modified in the following manner: 1) Provide access to the development from the Northeast corner (to provide service roads and access roads from highway #5) as spelled out in the original re -zoning of the land. 2) Relocate Apartment building numbered 1,2.,3 on their proposal to the western edge of the development. 3) Relocate Apartment building numbered 4,5 on their proposal to the West of Apartment building numbered 6,7,5; to provide a buffer zone and a recreational area between the new apartments and existing single family dwellings. 4) That the single family lots, known as numbers 1 thru 10 on the proposed plan, be developed prior to or simultaneously with Phase 1 of the development. Also, that these homes are compatible in value to existing homes on the western edge of Erie Ave. 5) That the single family lots be increased to coincide with the original approved plan as presented by Prestige Corporation in June of 1971. This would provide a greater buffer between existing single family homes and the greater density of population in the new development. 6) That the new development includes adequate landscaping which will enhance the value of the development and beautify the terrain. 7) That the new development meets all existing codes and ordinances of the Village of Chanhassen. e 3 4.�glel�. 5. AI.,- 1, 11, e r 6. AA cc )X4,e A.,�,4� /-- t k' V�iIZ pq��r7s Sv&O fo2Y kv- ae_, e Le r C-X\" ate., 13 - 14. 15. 16. 17. 20. 22 23 24 2 5 26 27 /7-L 2�� 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. /Z 34. 35. 36. 37. 8. C D 9 40. 7dwx AV"-7 er; - f t4 PDESIGN ' PLANN ING ASSOCIATES, INC. 4826 Chicago Avenue So. Minneapolis, Minnesota 554 .,� 12) 822 2106 June.7,. 1973 MEMORANDUM jUN19" RECEIVED VILLAGE OF _ CHANHASsM: To: McKeon Construction v��1Z'Z�2'�L.. James.D. Wiley, P.E. (Kirkham Michae Engineers) Franklin A. Martin,, President, Midwest Division From:' Carl R Dale, AIP Planning Consultant Subject-., for 'Housing PUD in Chanhassen, Minnesota This transmittal is sent to you as a result of the public hearing conducted in Chanhassen and as instructed by the Chanhassen Planning Commission. An attempt is made here to outline materials and information that would make your PUD submission morg complete and more`in accord with the desires and wishes of the.P.lanning Commission and Village regulations. Enclosed herewith is a procedural "check list" which is based upon Villa.ge.ordin-antes regarding -Planned Unit Developments. I presume:.als:o.that you have a copy of the Village Zoning Ordinance which also ra.ther.- cl early outl i nes'submission requirements. As an aid to your .next presentation, I would suggest "that°you consider the following: a) Soils mapping and information which apparently'is available from the SCS and also being developed by your,Engineer showing how your site plan relates to soils capability. b) Loca ion,of street or other lighting and type. c') Considerably more breakdown in detail concernifi§'land use acreage (amount in water, amount i-n streets,'actual land use by stages, and the like). d) A population component which indicates your projections of population.types (family size, age groups; etc:) in order that we may better evaluate recreation and other needs. e) Traffic data indicating your projections of traffic and how such volumes and.directional-flow might affect the surrounding area.. f) More detailed plans and:specificati'ons for landscaping. treatment;, plans submitted .to date show only`a tree planting arrangement which is not indicative of the final landscape quality intended. For example, it would normally be expected that shrubs, ro:cks,.mulch beds, and other features McKeon Construction -2- June 7, 1973 would also be included as part of a landscape "design". I realize that such a plan would entail some expense and that changes may yet be required in your site plans; for my purposes then at this time, a detailed plan for only a small area could be submitted that would indicate the quality intended for the entire project; this should be a "typical" design plan and not necessarily that for your model home area as landscape quality for that area is normally better than that utilized generally in a project. g) Details of intended street construction, right-of-way dedication, set -backs, improvements to Highway 101 and 5, and the like. Suggestions for additional right-of-way for T.H. No. 5 as noted by the Village Engineer plus coordination of service drive plans with potential adjacent development to the east should be considered. h) All utility easements as.may be desired by the Village Engineer. i) A drawing that clearly shows existing tree cover, topo- graphy and other physical features; several questions arose at the meeting concerning adaptation of the plan to site physical features. j) Others as you deem necessary and proper based upon your review of the various staff reports, comments at the meeting, and Village regulations required. It is my under, -- standing that you have copies of all reports and regulations applicable. Please let me know if you have any questions or need further information. VILLAGE OF CH.ANHAS-SEN Planned Development Procedure --CHECK LIST The following are steps to be taken and information required`•to obtain Planned Development Zoning......;' 1. Sketch Plan Prepare and submit to Planning. Commission Purpose: Informal discussion and comment,; determination of conformity to Comprehensive Village Plan. Information Schematic site plan indicating in Required: a general fashion-locations,,types, and densities of_ proposed land uses, intent and purpose.of development, transportation facilities,1'6nd any public use proposals. Applicant may submit such information as he believes,i necessary to explain nature of planned development proposal $'. 2: Proposed Preliminary More detailed sketch plan based,dupon' Development Plan sketch plan discussion.required,priOT A to submission of application for..; PUD zoning... ;, ;:�' Purpose: Review for general acceptance -prior to expenditure of effort and funds for more elaborate plans 'to`be re- quired for final approval " Information Maps and drawings;`whichmay' be in rr; Required: a schematic form, `showing: r a) Site in relation to surrounding area and uses: b) Proposed Land uses.,s=; c) Population dens i ties :i d) Land use intensities,_, e-) Existing topography'add tree cover,,.,, buildings, streets; and ath,er-si�to: features.«, f) Proposed public and private streets g) Open space" proposed.(public.and/or private). h). Architectural style of .buildings i) Written statement indicating natyre" '• Hof applicants 'i nterest. i property, ... . expected timing: of development, av* description of above r'egdir.ed maps,, and drawings. r ' y p t 'a 3. Prel,iminar-'bevelo ment Y p This is thegeneral, general pl a.n of,' develyop-, } P1 an ment upon which zoning,''maya,.be based,,;' plan is to be submitted to^'tbe Planning r; Y' Commission. C 6 Purpose: The information submitted shall ,be :A included in the zoning requirements along 'with such conditions as required by the Village, CoUpO 1'. ' Information A general plan of developm"entcinsist„ Requ i r.ed : i ng of the fo] 1 owl ng elements` or ` components which may be mod'if - d•4�a upon request for small projects: ^ a a,n Use Component .. •-- r ' "'r i' •. E Descri pt�on: A .Land Use Component' shal 1 r: t r or maps, •setti ng cons st of�� trap,^�*l� the distribution,- 1 ocat1onand:Pextent�F, of.'the acres'• of .land •devoted.: proiposed as`'rt "of th a to.•ea'ch cate:gory,Y;o and use 8a . G e eneral P.,l an of pevel opme.nt." "u,ch "uses , may i ncl ude," s i`ng�le -family res i dent;aT , �'tVvofai `�l`" �+ *�� residential , three or` more fami 1y res i dehti al , f;m-j`xed . ypes3j %of 'residential;neighborhood retail shopping'fac'ilities office facilities, ',service fa�ci1ities, educat1. eon re'' gi©_l�S, *` recreation; pu61 i c ',an'd semi -public facilities , or otfr'.,1 cate'gories'�..of..p'u'blic� or privatel;uses of`�la-n&:: SaidF"C m dnent t' '¢kp shall alsocon.tain,'.a' descriptive statement of objecti e�sa'°� � prpnciples and standards us d in its formuIa,ti06jt, 1j sic v,es ; 7?9k x k salt �x� �t5• ; � 1 a bCirc ,; ulation' Component Des tion•.` A Circulation Com on ' p p ent shal1.con$.;}st`�.of��= map ,or maps, setting'';forth .the general location'and-extent of':al1 transportation facilities proposed as",part of°`t General Plant of Development. Such facilities jticlu.dma j �r and local thoroughfares, _transportation, routes, ter.MI.- a4 q: -4Mt heliports, andthe delineation o_ f such .aystemsi.n k'ttei and, R' one-way, street. systems; grade separations,:divi;ed� l eft -turn, l anes,,, and such other", matters as',may, a ;fr to the provision for the circulation of .traffic andc"e es ,f rc5 tri ans within the`. planned: area ` related to the Land , se��a+"',= ` s ft1. Component Sai d,,.Ci rcu-1 ati on CQmponent; shall also _o.rlta�:�,t= , .+ �a, descriptive statement of objectives, pt�i nci pl e's ands&j, standards used for i is formul at on t. ��'_� ',,f�j{�+ •,� • , r�.°l +':; .,. ,. "r. - ,. � lY�., .•r t �,d��b'�� 4,.�� iY#"mklk� .xj :. 41 V14- '. Zas r, ✓: A .. r k . Ny-rrK a A7 iI 1 M c t Popul ati on Component t 'S a a� ka � = .'IC:. � � '%-4S',�� i-•.. T 9b • r �. esycriptlori APopulation- Component shahs;contain a,,� statement of the`.'standards of .population:density,'an6 j ntens 1 ty- .for' the"', vari ous proposed 1'and uses.; i ncJl ud} prof `'future :population 'characteristics' and, changeowit �i �ned, community" cor.reI ate with 'the other r. Componeh�ts o"f;t General Plan of Deve1'opment. '' The; supporting dat'a'sha, a ' but. not be limited to dwelling .(housing) units.p6r "atI vari.ous res'identi al uses proposed • -and � sduar�e 'footage' rnil t ett yap:Jny1 yp�.l }, ifk 49, g et°ti mates. l t e r11 u i,pla�• P4 14rr.rC Iude, r' e•for the t.h: va`r.ipusknon-residential,,fa'cilities t.c c.{ data Ito cdIcuAate, traff7c generation, p,ark,ipg.requaref tFi wa er�F onsu `mption.,' sewage needs'and th�.}`necessa�ry°c p4 t . .:,rea;ated .uti 1 i ties , and services .traditionally' rerrdere'd' public,or private organizations: for a population ofsa ;ff gas is pro jected for the completed, pl anned devel opmenl 1*F«i a ,>•. }�� '. a .r - q , 1 u ! d. Subdivision Design"Component ,�k hsYa Yrr'�s wsPescription -V Subdivision Design Component.sha1i�;Co descriptiversta`tement'of':the principles governi,o subdi Vi si"on of.`.a and '`i ncl uding , lot design ,for various' k i,I and uses." Thti s ',Component shall be., i n- suffi ci er%lt , et +that ,it can �s,erve as the,basis for determining' the co t , of ' any. site plan to the General Plan oft;-Developmenf:; 'Services_ a'nd Fac,i l i ties 'Component y; ,Description:. Ar'Services and Faci1itijj' es.a,ComoQnepais a map. or:,maps '.seating forth the_gene raj: jocatipn a0 and` all exi sti n and ,.g proposed systems fo'r; sews domestic water, supply and.; distribution .`,refused a drainage, utilities and rights-of=wayeasemen 'hies artd appur,te`nances necessary thereffor. SaidiCptt s. also`.contain a descriptive statement setting forth;a principles and; ,standards used' for its :formu,l ati`6n, a' as a detailed `statement de.scri bi ng the, p_ro,posed-, owne ,method ofr,, operat,i on,', and '`mai nt.enance of ;each such s' r f a'c i i t y. r k� ds 1 f,'i 6n's:truction Order. Component 3 r,.,Description. A Construction Order Comp.pnent'shall co ,m.ap, or maps setting' forth th'e . proposed- chronol 6g1 ofI c6 str:ucti on' relating each proposed. ,use -and strut ..z vCpnstruction'of the various services and facillt:ies`a requilted here;in..!;'Said Component shall, include'est�'ma ti Qn dates andshal 1 speci fy ,the proposed , orderof,' r Y �uti.1ityir.e,leaseror.,, other auth' 'y'to.�1o:ccupy 6ove7ert'e %',s.tructures;so a,s •.,to hprovide a basis far,de�erm�il;tng t of the, related `serv'i ces. and fat 1 i ti es foreach�"sepal^ •4:.constructi.on pflase. i ;< � 14 p t aFTr aerntS iiyae , Ah 'site-, �;TA #r3 ', d-,pppiN -f S ntaina- ,,, �G fj proposed;, proposed a f. S 6 nformt ty "bill 0 t Ar 04 `4�cojital fa,cj'1 nOnt'shaT . cti ves;, } e1}1 Co an :L a Y{yte ©mpe t fors dequacy' Wlt19 1� w Add1 t1 ona I-JComponents. , -4, j -Descri p'tJ on The General PI an of Devel opfne;wusi mp On as' ',i�,add.fti qhal,�jCom pone'nts- a 'Reciteaiio'n t'0p Pi u 'Ing"'Comp Ono nt,l providing roVi ing for: consi e r at I o n.-.fa..."7 ad M strbtive' and'Ubl ic" safety 'quarters, and Such J_n -i tated4 by nature of the, par i'h n a t t i rut ar, d _47g!i. P O's Ai ' M psand ReporJ ts' #`rxs 4 on T 4).; D e's c, 'r, 1 p t he 'Gen ral,.,P'lan, Of',Develop'itfi`e'-f* e -n 9,scatAli. sttppor,ti mabs" d-rawn' to e diagrams c arxS;i-,de�,t vl..repijrts��and ek0:.lanation-_ I.',Of,'methods...:ut'i i z d:L'i n�%j �t S '141 4. F. i 6a. 1, Development., Plan Final d o c U`m'o' j `,dl �'t t o e f i appr oved zoningdti jurpose: To incorporate ,`al 1r'e qJ1.1 r6 4"P1 modifications- and cond'�i'- 1 10 Rls,. Information All previou sly submi'tt6 ,,infor 1;.Roquired-, modified and l a'mended'.7 1 11, - a s-', r & q'u'l'r Final detailed dr alh a n which may be,, 6nly-for, f 'd first stage o e�vel'.Ozplpmq. A L t information r: e q u 1 r e d ..following. J a) Prel in a c co`,A i m in a,ry p Ya t With th:"e"��S'Ubdi.''Isl wgr, n and applicable, pr Subdi v i s 4�6'w"` Ord inan.c. b) Fi na 1 building' C awl 'h'S s p ec i f i Ca t-i On S-.r' Est d) Agreements provisions C 0 and spec4fi'c6t,Ions*',,,"_ r �,_q q I r a pi final p r ov a A S 0), Final site pl ans an inclu i lan,dsca i n6k p.1 p a e Engine ns4 ering-p a s p: C� i n o r m a ta n!, m fY Other by t h e .,V i 1,1 a qe'. C 0 f Note.-, The above J n ormation shall be c 9 m p i 1 e d Ifi e'"suppl'ie 44 d by the Village. Said inform t i o n -,,r,,e q u I r,'e I may be modified a s approved by the Plantivngc "Coinmiss 91 u P0.9 an evaluation "of the.size, sc I jrexj, ya a and the proposed'- tdetermination ay'if bey, r projec .;''swqh 'a. "'" t 0 10g. the' Sketc�`i"Plan stagd or prior e 4 Pro I. 141,na' ryi DevelopmentPlan a,n stage. Ai �4 kii! 1 ppmept..5 rya 0 �Lide. . 1 pti ons," 1 ,ati 'n .0 F 11,1� ,an m a t i o n ed t 'I 9-n Mat ; d ove M ional- LI de they M 8112 Dakota Lane Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 June 73 1973 Planning Commission Village Hall 7610 Laredo Drive Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 sentl emen; We were in attendance at the June 5 public hearing concerning the proposed Wood Hills Subdivision. It was most disturbing to find .plans for multiple dwelling units directly adjacent to Chanhassen Estates! We are very concerned about the effect the plan would have .:)n the present serene nature of the neighborhood. We dread the thought of an increased traffic pattern, and, to our values, the visual blight of the proposed large apartment complex. Dior are we convinced that our property values would not be adversely affected. Before purchasing our lot last fall at 8112 Dakota Lane, we checked with the Village Hall regarding proposed land use in the area.. uir. Adolph Tessness showed us a development plan (apparently the Pres- tige plan) that indicated the land adjacent to our western boundary would be left as a natural area. We were told the only traffic di- rectly west of our lot would be park maintenance vehicles. It was not revealed to us that this land was zoned to permit multiple family .housing units. on the strength of that conversation we purchased our Lot. We are indeed ir,!�.te to find the information given us may no Longer be credible! We think this is grossly unfair! We urge the Planning Commission to reconsider the proposed de- velopment as presented at the public hearing and to insist upon a zone of single, family Lots running from the ravine (a natural' bu.f- fer) to Chanhassen Estates. We further urge that the natural area southwest of Dakota Lane, Chanhassen Estates and running to the ra- vine be left intact as originally stipulated. cer, ly your f Robert the ine Woodford 5,x_ * -,V JUX 1973 c t ar Mtn IJPDESIGN PLANNING ASSOCIATES, INC. 4826 Chicago Avenue So. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417 Phone: (612) 822-2106 May 29, 1973 MEMO To: Gerald W. Schlenk Village Clerk Chanhassen Village Hall From: Carl R. Dale, AIP Planning Consultant The attached report is for distribution to the Planning Commission members and others as desired for the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for Tuesday, June 5, 1973. t3031. j MAY 1973 RECEIVED VILLAGE OF CHANHASSEN, MINN. _ DESIGN PLANNING ASSOCIATES, INC. 4826 Chicago Avenue So. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417 Phone: (612) 822.2106 April 23, 1973 Revised: May 25, 1973 PLANNING REPORT For: Planning Commission Village of Chanhassen, Minnesota By: Carl R. Dale, AIP Planning Consultant Subject: Planning Evaluation - McKeon Construction PUD Plan (Revision of Prestige PUD Plan Approved Earlier) Planning Considerations 1. The question here has to do with the basic "concept" plan as originally approved and if the new plan is still in accord with that approved concept or if Yt is significantly and substantially altered. It is our opinion that the new plan is substantially the same "concept" and that there has been no significant change that alters the originally approved concept. Changes have, however, been made in plan details. 2. Primary differences between the two plans are as follows: a) The new plan has less dwelling units (549 vs. 658) which is probably a plus factor. b) The new plan has somewhat less "open green" space although still a significant amount. It is normal to lose some green space in a plan as dwelling unit density is reduced. Open space relationships, however, are still the same. It should be noted that the original plan as approved was rather schematic and it is doubtful if the amount of open green space as indicated could actually have been achieved. c) Dwelling unit types have been altered somewhat with quad units replacing various types of townhouse structures; both, however, are considered "medium" density dwelling units with similar characteristics. 3. The plans submitted for review have been amended following discussion with Village officials and staff. Some suggestions were: a) Elimination of the proposed service station. PLANNING REPORT -2- Village of Chanhassen, Mn. b) Movement of active play areas (such from nearby single-family homes. c) Changes in the access road pattern reasons. May 25, 1973 as swimming pools) away at Highway 101 for safety These requested changes in the plan have been made as per Village suggestions. 4. A rather unique feature (for this part of the Country) is the "dual" system of public and private roads. Despite utilization of a larger percentage of land there are advantages providing the details are proper such as: a) Providing adequate and proper space for snow plowing on the private system. b) Not overly using public streets as public "parking lots". c) Assurance that the private street system will be built to a lasting degree of quality. d) Designing the public street system for some demonstrable "public use and purpose". In this case, the system seems to work although it should be subject to further review as additional plan detail is submitted by the Village Engineer and others. 5. Assuming the Planning Commission agrees that the new plan is substantially the same "concept" as originally approved, additional and more detailed plans should be required including but not necessarily limited to the following: a) Fully dimensioned site plan. (For the first stage.) b) Landscape plan. (For the first stage.) c) Provisions for maintenance of common green and recreation areas, trail system, etc. (Homeowner's Association, owner- ship arrangements, etc. and inter -related agreements between types of uses.) d) Specific plans and specifications for the first stage of development (including structural types). 6. A detailed Planned Unit Development Permit has been drafted con- taining suggested conditions of approval. Additional and more detailed plan, however, are required prior to finalization of such permit. 7. Public land dedication (Rice -Marsh Lake) should be accomplished at an early stage of development. 8. Plan details should include such easements and road right-of-way dedication (including Highway 101) as may be suggested by the Village Engineer. (Open space agreements should include use and maintenance of the trail system). PLANNING REPORT -3- May 25, 1973 Village of Chanhassen, MN. 9. As the plan now exists, screening will be required in various areas, especially at the edges of the project. 10. While the "concept" seems acceptable and not significantly different from the originally approved plans, further review and comment upon details will be required for proper and final action prior to construction. 11. The total project contains 83.42 acres with a gross density of 6.55 units per acre. It is proposed, however, to dedicate approx- imately 25 acres (Rice -Marsh Lake Area) as public open space which results in an adjusted gross density of about nine(9) units per acre; if public streets are considered, the net dwelling unit density then becomes approximately twelve (12) units per acre and even higher if the commercial areas are considered. The comparatively high net residential density is due primarily to the very high density (net) of the apartment building portion of the PUD development plan. It is suggested that this high density can be accommodated in the over-all plan but final plans should be subject to further review; as of the writing of this report, fully dimensioned and detailed site plans for the first stage of development were not available for review and comment. Items of concern should be as follows: a) Quality of proposed building construction; perhaps the Building Inspector can ascertain this from plans submitted. b) Quality of landscape design and plant materials; it is suggested that high -quality landscaping is rather essential to a project of this type. c) Site dimensions (setbacks, size and location of parking areas, relationship of all set -backs to the public road system, etc.). 12. A preliminary subdivision plan has been submitted; this plan would indicate that all for -sale units would be via the condominium method. The Village Attorney should be asked to comment upon this procedure. It is not clear why the nine (9) single family lots have not been platted; it is suggested that this be required and that such development be included in the first stage if feasible and practicable. 13. Plans do not clearly indicate if adequate right-of-way for the future improvement of Highway No. 101 has been provided. It is also not clear why a proposed north -south public street has not been indicated on the subdivision plan nor right-of-way for a service road along Highway No. 5. All such roads should be checked and coordinated with existing or potential development plans for adjacent land. 14. It is assumed that the Village Engineer will want public utility easements to allow for future public maintenance purposes if private owners do not properly assume that responsibility in the future. PLANNING REPORT -4- May 25, 1973 Village of Chanhassen, MN. SUMMARY While the plan in general seems satisfactory, a final deter- mination should be based upon further evaluation of more specific and detailed plans for the first stage of development. It is assumed that fully dimensioned site plans, landscape details, and the like are, or soon will be, available for review. Mr. & Mrs,. 'D., Lucken 8012, Erie: Ave. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mr. & Mrs. G. Carpenter 8014 Erie Ave. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mr. & Mrs. B. Frykman 8020 Erie Ave. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Robert Buesgens Builders 8043 Erie Ave. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mr. & Mrs. C. Ost ' 8035 Erie Ave. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mr. & Mrs. J. Turnacliff 8037 Erie Ave. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mr. & Mrs. R. Cavins 8104 Erie Ave. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Robert Mason Construction 14201 Excelsior Blvd. Minnetonka, MN J.H., Lein Construction 656 West 98th St. Bloomington, MN 55420-. Mr. & Mrs. G. Meister 8005 Erie Ave. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mr. & Mrs. L. Williams 8023 Erie Ave. chanhasseh( A / Mr. & Mrs. R.-Peterson American Legion Post 580 8033 Erie Ave. Highway 5 and 101 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mr. & Mrs. J. Holmes Standard,0il Co. 8026 Erie Ave. Highway 5 and 101 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mr. & Mrs. D. Loechler Mr. & Mrs. R. Naegele 8028 Erie Ave. Grand View Road Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mr. & Mrs. R. Roeser Mr. D.C. Throne 8030 Erie Ave. Rt. 2 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Excelsior, MN 55331 Mr. & Mrs. J..Calhoun Mr. &,Mrs. A.Sinnen 8032 Erie Ave. P.O. Box 92 Chanhassen, MN 55317 'Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mr. & Mrs. W. Weber Mr. & Mrs. F. Kurvers 8034 Erie Ave. Rt. 4 Box 510 Chanhassen, MN 55317 .Excelsior, MN 55331 Quality Homes, Inc. Mr. & Mrs. D. Gordon 12700 Wayzata Blvd. 300 W. 79th St. Minnetonka, MN P.O. Box 262 Chanhassen, MN. 55317 Mr. & MRs. E. Sexton.- Mr. & Mrs. H. Will 8210 Grand View Rd. P.O. Box 222 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mr. & Mrs. R. Woodford Mr. & mrs. T. Bernier 8112 Erie Ave. P.O. Box 157 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mr. Martin Ward Western Concrete Chanhassen, MN 55317 4032"Shoreline Drive Box 465 Spring Park, MN 55384 McKeon Conctruction Mr. & Mrs. H. Benidt Franklin A Martin 8115 Erie Ave. 1550 Northwest Divison �hdnhassp-r�� I'Y�N S f�� Suite 217 Park Ridge Illinois 60068 I , 6 ` `'-1 VILLAGE OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WOOD HILL SUBDIVISION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That the Village Planning Ccumnission of the Village of Chanhassen, Minnesota, will meet on Tuesday, the 5th day of June, 1973, at 7:30 p.m., at the Village Hall in said Village, for the purpose of holding a public hearing on a proposed preliminary development plan and preliminary plat known as "WOOD HILL SUBDIVISION", elated May 10, 1973, in the Village and involving the following described lards: Par.l. That part of the West Half of the Northeast.Quartcr of Section 13, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of t.te 5th Principal Meridian lying south ofthe southerly right-of- way line of State Highway No. 5 as described in Boom "Z" of Miscellaneous at Page 60, recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds, County of Carver, EXCEPT the two f')llowing described tracts of land. Said tracts are described a-3 follows 1. The west 353.00 feet of the south 270.00 feet of tht West Half of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 13. 2. The west 193.00 feet of the north 303.00 feet of the south 573.00 feet of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 13. And also EXCEPT that part of the first above described propirty which lies northerly and westerly of the following describer' line. Said line is described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 13, thence southerly along the west line of said West Half of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 1272.70 feet to the beginning of the line to be described; thence easterly, at right angles to said west line, a distance of 656.00 feet; thence northerly at right angles a distance of 418.15 feet; more or less to the intersection with the southerly right of way line of said highway and said line there terminating. Page 2 And also EXCEPT That part of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th principal Meridian described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said West Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence south, along the west line of said West Half of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 1272.70 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence east, at right angles to said West line, a distance of 656.00 feet; thence south, at a right angle, a distance of 150.00 feet; thence west, at a right angle, a distance of 656.00 feet to the west line of said West Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence north, at a right angle, along said west line, a distance of 150.00 feet to the point of beginning. Par. 2. The Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 13, -_- Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, except -the west 353.00 feet of the north 270.00 feet thereof. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN That the above described lands lie southeasterly of the intersection of State Highways 5 and 101 and abut Chanhassen Estates on the east and Rice Marsh Lake on the south. Plans showing said proposed development and preliminary plat are available for inspection at the Village Hall. All persons interested may appear and be heard at said tiii,& and place. Dated: May 16, 1973 BY ORDER OF THE VILLAGE PLANNING COMMISSION Gerald W. Schlenk, Village -Clerk Publish May 24, 1973, in the Carver County Sun. i J R-ussELL H. LARSON ATTORNEY AT LAw 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 Mr. Gerald W. Schlenl , Deputy Clerk Village of Chanhassen Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota Mr. John Neveaux Chairman, Planning Commission Route 5, Box 176-W Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 Gentlemen: TELEPHONE 335-9565 May 16, 1973 Mr. Franklin A. Martin President, Midwest Division McKeon Construction P. O. Box 597 Park Ridge, Illinois 60068 Mr. David W. Pratt First Minnetonka Real Estate, Inc. 150 South Broadway Avenue Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Re: Wood Hill Subdivision Attached please find a copy of the Notice of Public Hearing on the proposed preliminary development plan and preliminary plat of Wood Hill Subdivision scheduled for Tuesday, June 5, 1973, at 7:30 p.m. I have arranged for the piublication of this notice in the May 24th edition of the Carver County Sun. Our Zoning Ordinance requires that at least ten days before the hearing the Zoning Administrator shall mail an identical notice to each of the property owners within 200 feet of the outside boundaries of the land proposed to be developed. I suggest that this mailed notice be sent out no later than May 24th by the Village Hall staff. Ve r-,7 trul yo , Russell H. Larson ��'�"��`��, Chanhassen Village Hall a MAYl973 RHL:b ... � Enclosure � �eczIjl'� r-- cyA� alR s. "'INN. Div, RTSSSELL H. LARSON ATTORNEY AT LAW 1000 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 May 16, 1973 The Sun }Newspapers 6641 Wiest 78th Street Minneapolis, :-innesota Attention Iagal Publications Ra: Car•rer County un Gentlemen: TELEPHONE 335-a5(35 P-ttacned please find Notice :)Public earing oil ;proposed preliminary development plan and preliminary plat of Wood mill Subdivision in the Village of 05hannassen. This notica is to be pu:.)lished on faursday, 21, 19711, in tt-ie Carver County San, ALA your usual affidavit of publication and Staten ent to be sent directly to tide CaanAzssen Village 'all, Sox 147, Chanr3ass .;n, 11;'inno rota 55317. Very truly yours , Russell a. Larson CYaannassen 'Jillage attorney RsTL:b Enclosure 1 May 11, 1973 Mr. Russell H. Larson Village Attorney Village of Chanhassen 1900 First National Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 RE: Wood Hill Development Contract Between McKeon Construction and the Village of Chanhassen Dear Mr. Larson: I want to thank you for your patience and consideration yester- day in our discussion regarding McKeon Construction's proposed P-2'Planned'Unit Development, Wood Hill. I thought,perhaps I would express in writing some of the points which we discussed yesterday so that they may be considered and/or incorporated into a first draft of the development contract. Perhaps the most important item to us is the fees associated with the use of municipal sanitary sewer and water services. As you know, economic feasibility analysis is a critical step in developing criteria as to the overall probability of pro- ceeding with a development such as Wood Hill. Frankly, we find the present interpretation of the sewer and water fees to be too.burdensome and excessive. We would like the Village to base the required sewer and water fees upon number of bedrooms in a given unit, regardless of whether it is a rental apartment or a for sale condominium. Certainly the anticipated consump- tion of water appears to be a sound basis for the structuring of the water fees;- and likewise, anticipated treatment volume seems to be a fair yardstick for setting sewer fees. There- fore, we sincerely -believe that it would be unfair to treat our two bedroom patio homes any differently than a two bedroom apartment as regards these sewer and water fees. r,K;� I' t� �a►�fn, ��,11. hi�r �t1 , jn111i Nji1,�1111�►n1 `�`I'I`IN ily� frill+t !i'J, Ilnrk Itljltt1+, 1111j►niN t�nt�t�r+, t;aivl v�,r ;,ar,, May 11, 1973 Mr. Russell H. Larson Village Attorney Village of Chanhassen 1900 First National Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 RE: Wood Hill Development Contract Between McKeon Construction and the Village of Chanhassen Dear Mr. Larson: I want to thank you for your patience and consideration yester- day in our discussion regarding McKeon Construction's proposed P-2'Planned'Unit Development, Wood Hill. I thought,perhaps I would express in writing some of the points which we discussed yesterday so that they may be considered and/or incorporated into a first draft of the development contract. Perhaps the most important item to us is the fees associated with the use of municipal sanitary sewer and water services. As you know, economic feasibility analysis is a critical step in developing criteria as to the overall probability of pro- ceeding with a development such as Wood Hill. Frankly, we find the present interpretation of the sewer and water fees to be too.burdensome and excessive. We would like the Village to base the required sewer and water fees upon number of bedrooms in a given unit, regardless of whether it is a rental apartment or a for sale condominium. Certainly the anticipated consump- tion of water appears to be a sound basis for the structuring of the water fees;- and likewise, anticipated treatment volume seems to be a fair yardstick for setting sewer fees. There- fore, we sincerely -believe that it would be unfair to treat our two bedroom patio homes any differently than a two bedroom apartment as regards these sewer and water fees. r,K;� I' t� �a►�fn, ��,11. hi�r �t1 , jn111i Nji1,�1111�►n1 `�`I'I`IN ily� frill+t !i'J, Ilnrk Itljltt1+, 1111j►niN t�nt�t�r+, t;aivl v�,r ;,ar,, ivi . Russeil h. Larson May 11, 1973 Page Two As you know, we anticipate that Wood Hill will be a four year development and accordingly we are asking for a form of fee increase protection over the expected period of our construc- tion phases. We request this protection for all types of Village imposed fees such as building permits and sewer and water fees. Another important consideration to McKeon Con- struction is the effective time period of Village approval for our preliminary plat of Wood Hill. Accordingly, we re= quest that the preliminary plat approval be at least as long .as the anticipated construction cycle for all,phases. Builders have specialities and ours is multi -family for sale housing; and therefore, we are asking for the flexibility to sell portions. of Wood Hill to other builders who have special- ties in other areas so that we will keep the development mov- ing at a pace which will be mutually beneficial to the Village and McKeon Construction. As discussed,' we are also asking the Village to accept joint obligee performance bonds issued by our improvement subcon- tractors"for all public improvement work naming both McKeon Construction and the Village of Chanhassen, in lieu of separ- ate bonds issued by us to the Village. Since we will have a walk path connecting all areas of Wood Hill and will provide aesthetically pleasing private lighting, we would like to have the development contract specify that no public street lighting or sidewalks will be required. We also are requesting that the development contract include a provision for common sanitary sewer and water services into the condomin- ium buildings. McKeon Construction is very anxious to see Wood Hill proceed, and therefore asks that it be granted building permits for the I apartment and condominium models and recreational facilities as soon as the development contract is executed and the Village Council has approved the preliminary plat and preliminary engin- eering. Finally, we would like the development contract to provide that the Village will cooperate in condemning the necessary property to provide our most Southerly access onto Highway 101, if we are unable to consummate the purchase of this property on a reasonable basis. - F41I1111.111111,111i May lls 1973 +_ Page Three We hope that the above items can be incorporated into our development contract.with the Village. I look forward to seeing you on May 22, at 9:30 p.m. for our•public hearing of the preliminary plat for.Wood Hill. Very truly yours, MCKEON CONST UCTION Franklin A. Martin FAM,/jc President, Midwest - Division cc: George R. McKeon E. Lee Friedrich Dwight C. Adams , May 1, 1973 McKeon Construction Co. R!VMst Division 1550 Northwest HiThways Suite 217 Park Ridge, Illinois 60068 Attention: Franklin Martin Dear fir. Martin: The Planning Commission at their meeting on April 24, 1973 set the Public Hearing for your preliminary,plat as May 15, 1973 at 7:30 p.m. As per our Zoning Ordinance it rec ^_-es that you have all of your preliminary plat materUl i.nti- Prior to the hearing being set. If all of your material is in to me before May 7, 1973 at 4:30 p.m.,: the Public Hearing will be set at 9:30 p.m. May 22, 1973. The reason for this one week delay is so that I will be able to review all the material,'you have submitted and assure that all materials as required by t ��.attirig Ordinance have been submitted in proper form. A_�— If themware any further questions concerning this letter and the scheduling of the Public Hearing, please contact me by telephone. Sincerely yours, Adolph Tessness Zoning Administrator AT:kjs cc: John Neveaux, Planning Commission Chairman Russell H. Larson, Village Attorney April 29, 19U___ 4 Mr. Wm. Schoell Schoell and Madson 50 Ninth AVe. South Hopkins, MN 55343 SUBJECT.: McKeon Construction Proposal -- Your letter dated April 28, 197. Dear Bill: Attached is a very preliminary skis-ch plan as presented by the McKeon Construction fib, at the meeting of April 24, 1973. They will be subxaitting to us their puns for their preliminary approval as poi the ordinance. As soon as these plans have been received, they will be forwarded to you for your review and comments. Very truly yours, Adolph Tessness Clerk -Administrator AT: kjs Enclosure WILLIAM 0. SCHOELL CARLII Mr. Adolph Tessness P. 0. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minn. 55317 Dear Adolph: SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC. ENGINEERS ANO SURVEYORS 7601 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 April 28, 1973 Subject: McKeon Construction Co. Proposal to Develop the Sinnen Property I note in the Planning Commission minutes of April 24th that we should make a report on the subject proposal. I would appreciate your sending us a copy of the pro- posed arrangement as soon as possible. I received a copy of Carl Dale's report. Wouldn't it be a gold idea to send me a copy of all such proposals as soon as you receive them? It would then give us a little more time to study them, as well as have some input to the Planning Commission during their initial discussions of such plans. WDSchoell:sd Very truly yours, (;t;z VILLAGE ENGINEER V APP 1973 R&'1fi'ED VILLAGE OF CNANHASSEN, r MINN. _� s SCHOELL & MAOSON, INC. ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS WILLIAM D. SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON PHONE 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MtNNESOTA 55343 938.7601 October 7, 1971 Prestige Development Corporation 6975 Washington Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55435 Attention: Mr. Carl C.-Carrico Subject: Placing Sanitary Sewer and Water Stubs into the Sinnen Tract. Dear Sir: Enclosed please find a statement from Fox & Weiler, Inc.; for the above named services. This Contractor had the contract for placing sanitary sewer and water in Chanhassen Estates Second Addition and these are his unit price bids for that work. This is in accord to your letter of July 13, 1971. This work is completed and the quantities and price are right, therefore, we recommend this payment as final. Please make the payment to Fox & Weiler, Inc. of Shakopee. Very truly yours, SCHOELL &�jMAD�SON, INC. FVLaska : dr J/?f��G✓ l/i ;, G`�` enclosure cc: Fox & Weiler, Inc. Village of Chanhassen, c/o Mr. Adolph Tessness FOX AND WEILER, INC. DATE 464 So. Minnesota Street Oct.4. 1971 SHAKOPEE, MINN. 55379 NUMBER Phone 445-3888- Prestige Development. Chanhassen Minn. • i i•, TERMS: •LGSf DETACH AND RETURN WITH YOUR REMITTANCE DATE CHARGES AND CREDITS BALANCE BALANCE FORWARD 205 r 8" UP j06.12 ft. 1254. *0 1-8" gate valve & box- 190 00 1-1/16 8w bend' 135# Q'W.50-. 67 50 1-8 4 tee 180F G �0.50_ 90 00 251 8"VCP 8-101 9$4..30. 107 50. 25 r "• 10-12'14 QU.85 121 25 _ 75 c " 1G-18 r 0 7. 50' 562 50 25 a tr 18-20 ri ©313.75 343 .75 20r ft" 20-22 016.00 320 00 I t Approved for Payment SCIiO� L M GSON, INC., EN11 EERS B................... Date. � -- •--.._ $3057 10 PAY AMOUNT .. - FOX AND WEILER. INC. ow IN THIS HIS COLUMN C - tF SCHOELL MAOSON, INC. y ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS -01 WILLIAM D. SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON PHONE 938-7614 • 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 553, June 2, 1971 93456 suN1971 0 Mr. Bob Robertson N RECEIVED RCMA, Inc. N VILLAGE OF �. P. 0. Box 130 •' CHANHASSEN, c � Hopkins, Minn. 55343 MINK• L�4 subject: Chanhassen, Prestige Develonmen Dear Bob: Walt Whiting called relative to possible construction costs for sewer, water and roads in the Prestige Development Co. area. I asked him to get these from you, and am enclosing a list of the low bid prices received from Fox & Weiler a month or so ago. The second bid was at about $82,000 and the third at $86,000, so the low bid was no fluke. Hope this will help in assembling your cost estimates. Very truly yours, SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. WDSchoell:sd cc: Adolph Tessness - z a . DESIGN PLAN, H IMG ASSOCIATES, Id1C. 4826 Chicago Avenue So. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417 Phone: (612) 822-2106 April 23, 1973 PLANNING REPORT For: Planning Commission Village of Chanhassen, Minn. Rt By: Carl R. Dale, AIP Planning Consultant Subject: Pl-anning Evaluation - McKeon Construction PUD Plan (Revision of Prestiege PUD Plan Approved Earlier) PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 1. The basic question here has to do with the basic "concept" plan as originally approved and if the new plan is still in accord with that approved concept -or if it is significantly and substantially altered. It is our opinion that the new plan is substantially the same "concept" and that there has been no significant change that alters the originally .approved concept. Changes have, however, been made.in plan details. 2. Primary differences between the two plans are as follows: a) The new plan has less dwelling units (554 vs 658) which is probably a plus factor. b) The new plan has somewhat less "open green" space although still a significant amount. It is normal to lose some green space in a plan as dwelling unit density is reduced. Open space relationships, however, are still the same. It should be noted that the original plan as -approved was rather schematic and it is doubtful if the amount of open green space as indicated could actually have been achieved. c) Dwelling unit types have been altered somewhat with quad units .replacing various types of townhouse structures; both, however, are considered "medium" density dwelling units with similar characteristics. 3. The plans submitted for review prior to the meeting are to be amended following discussion with Village officials and staff; these are to be presented at the Planning Commission Meeting. 'Some4�u9g.Qtio,ns were: a) Elimination of the proposed service station i or -2- b) Movement of active play areas (such as swimming pools) away from nearby single-family homes. c) Changes in the access road pattern at Highway 101 for safety reasons. 4. A rather unique feature (for -this part of the Country) is the "dual" system of public and private roads. Despite utilization of a larger percentage of land there are advantages providing the details are proper such as: a) Providing adequate and proper space for snow plowing on the private system. b) Not overly using public streets as public "parking lots". c) Assurance that the private street system will be built to a lasting degree of quality. d) Designing the public street system for some demonstrable "public use and purpose". In this case, the system seems to work although it should be subject to further review as additional plan detail is.submitted. 5. Assuming .the Planning Commission agrees that the new plan is substantially the same -"concept" as originally approved, additional and more detailed plans should be required including but not necessarily limited to the following: 4 a) Fully dimensioned site' plan. b) Landscape plan. c) Grading, utilities, and drainage plan. d) Stage development plan. e) Provisions for maintenance of common green and recreation areas, trail system, etc. (Home owner's associa+ion, owner- ship arrangements, etc. and inter=related agreements between types of uses. f) Specific plans and spec-ifications for the first stage of development (including structural types). 6. A detailed Planned Unit Development Permit should be drafted con- taining all conditions of approval. Additional and more detailed plans, however, are required prior to drafting such a permit. 7. Public land dedication (Rice Marsh -Lake) should be accomplished at an early stage of development. 8. Plan details should include such easements and road right-of-way dedication (including Highway 101) as may be suggested'by the Village Engineer. (Open space agreements should include use and maintenance of the trail system). 9. As the plan now exists, screening will be required in various areas, especially at the edges of the project. 10. While the "concept" seems acceptable and not significantly differ- ent from the originally approved plans, further review and comment upon details will be required for proper and final action prior to construction. FACT SHEET FOR McKEON CONSTRUCTION'S PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA Total Acres - 83.42 Total Dwelling Units - 546 - Dwelling Units Per Acre 6.55 Total Apartments -.180 1. One Bedroom,.- J60 Two Bedroom - 120 Total Patio Homes - 356. 11.1 All Two Bedroom Total Detached Single Family - 10 Total Residential Parking Spaces -'1157' Apartment Spaces -- 360 Covered - 180 - Open -- 180 Patio Home Spaces - 712 ` Covered --• 356'' Detached Private Tandem - 356 Single Family Spaces 20 Additional Offstreet Guest Spaces 65 Total Building Ground Coverage = 9.86 Acres (11.82% of Total Land Area) Apartments & Related Covered Parking - 2.20 Acres Patio Homes & Related Covered Parking -- 7.32-Acres Detached Single Family - .34 Acres Development Phases: Anticipated Phase Total Units Construction Period Phase I 156 Summer, 1973 Phase II 169 Summer, 1974 Phase III 145 Summer, 1975 Phase IV 76 Summer,'1976 Total: 546 (4/73) Prestige Development Company March 27, 1973 Mr. Adolph Tessness Village of Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota Re: McKeon Construction Dear Mr. Tessness: As we have discussed our firm, Prestige Development Company, has entered into a purchase agreement with McKeon Construction, a California corporation. They are purchasing the property, commonly known as the Sinnen farm, for development according to the basic plans that have been previously presented and approved by village commissions. We have agreed with McKeon that the purchase and development of this property is subject to economic feasibility studies, approval of proper governmental authorities, proper zoning, and assurance from appropriate municipal authorities that all necessary connections for local water, sanitary and storm sewer systems are or may be established. If you have any questions, I will be pleased to assist you in obtaining an answer. Your past cooperation has been greatly appreciated. If we may be of service in the future please do not hesitate calling on our firm. Sincerely, fld M. zman� DMG:jib 6975 Washington Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55435 Telephone: 612/941-7111 McKEO�N CON TRUCTION March 26, 1973 Mr. Adolph Tessness Village Manager Village of Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota Re: McKeon Construction's Land Plan for Prestige Development's Property Located on State Highway 5 in Chanhassen, Minnesota Dear Mr. Tessness: I would like to introduce myself to you on behalf of McKeon Construction' interest in Prestige Development's property located in the Village of Chanhassen. Enclosed for your review, you will please find our 1972 Annual Report. On March 15, 1973, McKeon Construction contracted to purchase Prestige Development's Planned Unit Development located in Chanhassen. Our corporate architect, Mr. Benedict Adams, is diligently proceeding with the development of an overall land plan, which will be in general con- formance with the previously submitted Prestige plan. We anticipate that a plan will be available for the Village's consideration no later than May 1, 1973, and it is our intention to commence construction no later than September 1, 1973. We are planning the initial stage of development to be in the area north of the proposed collector street connecting Chanhassen Estates with County Highway 101 and will consist of rental apartments and for sale patio townhomes. We sincerely hope that the Village's Planning Commission will withhold further action on this P.U.D. until we have had the opportunity to present our preliminary site plan. Thank you for your consideration to this matter. Very truly yours, _XQK CO S RU I0. ranklin A. Martin, Pr ent Midwest Division Chicago Division, 1550 Northwest Highway, Suite 217, Park Ridge, I11. 60068, (312) 297-7620 Prestige Development Company January 22, 1973 Mr. John Neveaux Chairman, Planning Commission Village of Chanhassen P. 0. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Sinnen Property — Village of Chanhassen Dear John: As agreed in your meeting of December 12, 1972, I promised to give to the Village of Chanhassen Planning Commission, a written schedule regarding development of the Sinnen property. At that time, I in— dicated we were negotiating financing with several lenders regarding construction of the project as approved by your Commission. At this time, these negotiations have not been successful. The failure of these negotiations is not attributed to unfavorable attitude towards Chanhassen or its future nor the financial strength of the developer. It is based on reluctance of lenders towards apartments. John, as I have mentioned to you several times, I believe in the growth and potential of Chanhassen and appreciate the aid and cooperation I have received from Adolph Tessness and your commission. It is a bitter personal disappointment to me that this project has not proceeded as outlined and I intend to pursue it to its success— ful conclusion. Since lya Carl C. Carrico President CCC :jib 6975 Washington Avenue South (Edina, Minnesota 55435 Telephone: 612/941-7111 STATE Or ��II�'� I:�SO�I-�'� DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS 04STRICT NO 5 2035 NO.LILAC DRIVE MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. d+� c . el: A� Au;;ust 101 1971 Yr. R. C. Potz Senior Civil Technician Rieke -Carroll -:Muller Associates Inc. 8700 West 36th Street St. Louis Park, I,1innesota In reply refer to: 315 S.P. 1002-25 (T.H. 5) S.E. Quadrant at T.H. 101 Dear .'dr. Potz: f` FLIP, r [no L� �. LS is?°nn. F 5534 .J `J q�- Coll) i Please find enclosed the contour map and typical sections in the proposed development area by Prestige Development Corporation. Our earlier discussion i-rjd cated the future !'-H- 5 center line e spacing �pacir_�; to ba 84 ft.; ho.,,rever, Uhe standard, now is a 124 ft. cc a-Ger � L:.E SnoCi� tt as shovin on the typical sections. The location of the typical secltione '' is shovv_n on the contour map 'which also shows the constx:actioli lim; ts. It would be desirable to locate any buildings outside of the const?action limits. Yle appreciate your request for recom::end atior_s. If you have any further questicns, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, N. R. Osterby District Engineer ell, By: C. J. Hoffstedt Assistant District Preliminary Design Engineer Enclosure Contour m'-.p Tnical sections i • t w Prestige Development Corporation August 5, 1971 Mr. Adolph Tessness Village Administrator Village of Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota Dear Mr. Tessness: l v '<� AU 0971, v r RECLrIvEr) P 4�I.LF q�,E FEE d CHALK HASSEN. � Enclosed is the Chanhassen Agreement and Statement of Intent letter from Mr. Russell H. Larson per our past conversation. Sincerely yours, Donald M. Goetzman DMG :jib Enc. 6975 Washington Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55435 Telephone: 612/941-7111 Prestige Development Corporation Mr. Adolph Tessne'ss Village Manager Village of Chanhassen Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota Dear Adolph: July 13, 1971 55317 Re: Engineering Report, Prestige Development Corporation, Sinnen Tract W. D. Schoell, May 13, 1971 Having reviewed the engineering report of Bill Schoell Is regarding the Sinnen Tract, we are in agreement to the installation of water and sewer stubs in the northeast corner of the Prestige area. It is our understanding that construction costs of these stubs will be about $3,000.00 and we are more than happy to accept this expense. Thank you for your genuine effort in our behalf. Sincerely yours, Carl C. Carrico. CCC:jib cc: Jerry Allan Donald Goetzman Bill Schoell 6975 Washington Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55435 Telephone: 612/941-7111 r; r RuSSELL H. LARSON ATTORNEY AT LAw 1000 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOEIS, MINNESOTA55402 TEEEPHONE 335-9565 July 13, 1971 N � � • �4& sup 1911 ' 00 � YtiLLAG� 6EN� �CHAN�'k5 n P/►►NN• 1 Village Council Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Prestige Development Corporation Sinnen Property Dear Council Members, On July 9th I met with Mr. Carrico and Mr. Goetzmann of Prestige and its attorney concerning the statement of intent of June 28th, with par- ticular reference to the prohibition against assignment to which they voiced some objection. As it appears that the Village will exercise continuing control over the development of this property under the planned unit development concept no matter who the owner or developer is, I see no objection at this time to deleting the prohibition against assignment. Accordingly, I have prepared and submitted a revised Statement of Intent, dated July 13, 1971. Please destroy your copies of the state- ments of June 21st and 28th. ry truly y Russell H. Larson Chanhassen Village Attorney RHL:b Enclosure RUSSELL H. LARSON ATTORNEY AT LAW 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 July 13, 1971 rr) pt�U}g71 a CV RFCEIVE'D C, V {LLAG� OF CV4 1HA55EN� �� 6,._s N11NN. _C\�i Village Council Village of Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Agreement and Statement of Intent Prestige Development Corporation Proposal Dear Council Members: TELEPHONE 335.9565 Reference is made to the Prestige Development Corporation's written proposal of May 17, 1971, with accompanying sketch plans regarding its proposed development of the Sinnen property as a P-2 Planned Unit Development District under the proposed zoning ordinance. The description of the tract of land in- volved in this proposal is set forth on Exhibit A attached. In accordance with your request I met with Mr. Carl C. Carrico of Prestige on June 16, 1971, for the purpose of enlarging and clarifying certain aspects of the proposal of May 17th. Thereafter at the Council meeting of June 21st, further represen- tations were made, and subsequently on July 9th I met with Mr. Carrico and Mr. Donald Goetzmann of Prestige and its attorney, Glenn G. Nybeck. The following statement of intent now includes all matters submitted and dis- cussed in the several meetings with Prestige in connection with its proposal. ZONING: In the event the proposal to develop this property as a P-2 Planned Unit De- velopment District is acceptable to the Council, it is my recommendation that Prestige agrees to be bound by the provisions of the P-2 District Zoning Regulations as finally enacted by the Village Council. Prestige has been fur- nished with a copy of the proposed P-2 regulations which allow for residential and restrictive commercial uses within a P-2 District and recognizes that these may be subject to changes of a procedural nature prior to final adoption of the new zoning ordinance. Village Council -2- July 13, 1971 OWNERSHIP OR UNIFIED CONTROL: I am informed by Mr. Carrico that Prestige Development Corporation is a Minnesota corporation controlled by Carl C. Carrico, Donald M. Goetzman and Ruben H. Andregg. Mr. Carrico further informed me that the land in- volved is being purchased from Anna Sinnen under a contract for deed. As the proposal involves the use of land it is imperative that Mrs. Sinnen file a written consent with the Village agreeing to the proposed development and rezoning. The consent appears at the foot of this letter and should be exe- cuted by her. RECREATION BUILDING: The activities and facilities of the indoor recreation area shown at Phase 6 on the plan will be of a non-commercial nature and the use thereof will be restricted to residents of the project. No public recreation facilities will be permitted. COMMERCIAL AREA: The commercial area shown at Phase 6 on the proposed development plan is to be developed with retail shops and facilities for the convenience of residents of the project and abutting areas. Mr. Carrico was not able to submit detailed proposals as to the nature of the commercial activity to be established except to say that the commercial development would be dictated by the needs of the immediate area for such services. A gasoline service station might possibly be proposed if a need for such service in the area is demonstrated. Prestige understands that all aspects of the final develop- ment of the commercial area are subject to approval by the Village. NON -DEDICATED OPEN SPACE• Non -dedicated open space is to be maintained by Prestige Development Corpora- tion, its successors and assigns, in accordance with all ordinances and regu- lations of the Village. The non -dedicated open space is to be reserved for recreational purposes for the use and enjoyment of residents of the project, and will not be sold or otherwise disposed of without first offering to dedi- cate the same to the Village at no cost as dedicated open space. Village Council -3- July 13, 1971 HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES: The height of all structures within the development, including the multiple dwelling district shown as Phase 5, is to conform to all Village requirements. DEDICATED OPEN SPACE: The "valley" area shown on the proposed development plan lying between Phase 3 and 5 and extending to the easterly and southerly boundaries of the tract is to be dedicated to the Village as open space. Pedestrian path ease- ments and service road easements, as needed, affording access to the area are to be dedicated by the developer. It is the intent of the developer and the Village that the open space be retained in its natural state, subject to such maintenance by the Village as may be required. The developer agrees to provide public access to the south area of the open space from the east boundary. ROADS: All roads within the project are to be public roads and dedicated to the Village. Service road easements required to furnish access to the valley area for Village maintenance purposes should be limited to use by Village vehicles only. ACCEPTANCE: The statements of intent set forth in the foregoing letter and the agreement to be bound by the final P-2 Zoning Regulations should be formally acknowledged by Prestige Development Corporation and said acknowledgement should be affirmed by execution of the atceptanc appearing at the foot of this letter. 1 Ve tr y rs Russell H. Larson Chanhassen Village Attorney RH L: b Village Council -4- July 13, 1971 ACCEPTANCE All of the foregoing statements of intent are hereby affirmed and accepted by the undersigned, and the undersigned agrees to be bound by the P-2 District Zoning Regulations as finally adopted by the Village of Chanhassen. PRES E DEVE PM, ENT CORPORATION By �, Its F'...� Dated this day of 1971. CONSENT The undersigned, as owner of the above premises, hereby consents to the above described development plan and proposed zoning. ANNA SINNEN Dated this day of � , 1971. 11 RUSSELL H. LARSON ATTORNEY AT LAW 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BAND BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 June 21, 1971 Village Council Village of Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Statement of Intent Prestige Development Corporation Proposal Dear Council Members: TELEPHONE 335 - 95(i5 Reference is made to the Prestige Development Corporation's written proposal of May 17, 1971, with accompanying sketch plans regarding its proposed development of the Sinnen property as a P-2 Planned Unit Development District under the proposed zoning ordinance. In accordance with your request I met with Mr. Carl C. Carrico of Prestige on June 16, 1971, for the purpose of enlarging and clarifying certain aspects of the proposal of May 17th. My report is as follows: ZONING: It is my view that the more appropriate zoning for this area would be under the proposed P-1 Planned Residential Development District zoning rather than a P-2 District. The uses proposed for this land by the developer are more compatible with the permitted and accessory uses set forth under the proposed P-1 District than under a P-2 District. The latter district allows as permitted uses administrative and professional offices, financial institutions, etc. , none of which are proposed for this district. In the event the proposal is approved by the Council, it is my recommendation that the zoning be accom- plished through a contract whereby the developer will agree to be bound by the Provisions of the P-1 Planned Residential Development District as finally enacted by the Village Council. Village Council -2- June 21, 1971 OWNERSHIP OR UNIFIED CONTROL: I am informed by Mr. Carrico that Prestige Development Corporation is a Minnesota corporation controlled by Carl C. Carrico, Dan Goetzmann and Rueben H. Andregg. Mr. Carrico further informed me that the land involved is being purchased from the+:Estate of .Enna Sinnen 'under a contract for deed. As the proposal involves the use of land it is imperative that the representative of this estate file a written consent with the Village agreeing to the proposed development and rezoning. RECREATION BUILDING: The activities and facilities of the indoor recreation area shown at Phase 6 on the plan will be of a non-commercial nature and the use thereof will be restricted to residents of the project. No public recreation facilities will be permitted. COMMERCIAL AREA - The commercial area shown at Phase 6 on the proposed development plan is to be developed with retail shops and facilities for the convenience of residents of the project and abutting areas. Mr. Carrico was not able to submit detailed Proposals as to the nature of the commercial activity to be established except to say that the commercial development would be dictated by the needs of the immediate area for such services. A gasoline service station might possibly be proposed if a need for such service in the area is demonstrated. Prestige understands that final development of the commercial area is subject to approval by the Village. NON -DEDICATED OPEN SPACE: Non -dedicated open space is to be maintained by Prestige Development Corpora- tion, its successors and assigns, in accordance with all ordinances and regu- lations of the Village. The non -dedicated open space is to be reserved for recreational purposes for the use and enjoyment of residents of the project, and will not be sold or otherwise disposed of without first offering to dedicate the same to the Village at no cost as dedicated open space. Village Council _3_ June 21, 1971 HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES: The height of all structures within the development, including the multiple dwelling district shown as Phase 5, is to conform to all Village requirements. DEDICATED OPEN SPACE: The "valley" area shown on the proposed development plan and lying between Phase 3 and 5 is to be dedicated to the Village. Pedestrian path easements and service road easements, as needed, affording access to the area will be dedicated by the developer. ROADS: All roads within the project are to be public roads and dedicated to the Village. Service road easements required to furnish access to the valley area for Village maintenance purposes should be limited to use by Village vehicles only. ACCEPTANCE: The statements of intent set forth in the foregoing letter should be formally accepted by Prestige Development Corporation and said acceptance should be affirmed by execution of the endorsement appearing at the foot of this letter. Very truly yours, Russell H. Larson Chanhassen Village Attorney RHL:b cc Planning Commission Park & Recreation Commission ACCEPTANCE All of the foregoing statements of intent are hereby affirmed and accepted by the undersigned. PRESTIGE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION By --Its —------- - Dated this day of June, 1971. I - ---------- VILLAGE OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED REZONING. NOTICE 1S HEREBY GIVEN that the Village Council and Planning Commission of the Village of Chanhassen, Minnesota, will meet on June 7, 1971, at 8:00 o'clock P.M., at the Village Hall in said Village, for the purpose of holding a public Hearing on the proposed rezoning in the Village as follows: 1. To rezone the following described tract of land a FARM RESIDENCE DISTRICT to a BUSINESS DISTRICT as defined in Chanhassen Township Ordinance No. 1 as amended: The proposed zoning will be restricted to use as defined in the P-2 District in the preliminary draft of a new zoning ordinance. The proposed area is: That part of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian lying south of the southerly right-of-way line of State Highway No. 5 as described in Book "Z" of Miscellaneous at Page 60, recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds, County of Carver, EXCEPT the two following described tracts of land. Said tracts are described as follows: 1. The west 353.00 feet of the south 270.00 feet of the west Half of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 13. 2. The west 193.00 feet of the north 303.00 feet of the south 573.00 feet of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 13. And also EXCEPT that part of the first above described property which lies northerly and westerly of the following described line. Said line is described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of Said Section 13; thence south- erly along the west line of said West Half of the North- east Quarter a distance of 1272.70 feet to the beginning of the line to be described; thence easterly, at right angles to said west line, a distance of 656.00 feet; thence northerly at right angles a distance of 418.15 feet, Page. 2 more or less, to the intersection with the southerly right-of-way line of said highway, and said line there terminating. And also EXCEPT that part of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said West Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence south, along the west line of said West Half of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 1272.70 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence east, at right angles to said West line, a distance of 656.00 feet; thence south, at a right angle, a distance of 150.00 feet; thence west, at a right angle, a distance of 656.00 feet to the west line of said West Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence north, at a right angle, along said west line, a distance of 150.00 feet to the point of beginning. Par.2 The Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, except the west 353.00 feet of the north 270.00 feet thereof. This area approximately 84 acres of land. All persons interested may appear and be heard at said time and place. BY ORDER OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL B A�L-fnl —- Clerk Dated May 17, 1971 Publish in the Minnetonka and Carver County Sun on May 27, 1971. NOTICES SENT ON MAY 28, 1971 to the following -people: Robert Mason Chan American Legion Post 0580 - Dutch Pauly Harvey Wills Tim Benier Albert Sinnen Roman Sinnen R. T. Sexton Arthur Emerson Martin Ward Keith .Bartz Russ -ELL H. LARSON ATTORNEY AT LAW 1000 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 May 24, 1971 Planning Commission Village of Chanhassen P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Prestige Development Corporation P-2 Proposed Preliminary Development Plan Gentlemen: TELEPHONE 335-9565 I have reviewed the P-2 Proposed Development Plan and Statement dated May 17, 1971, submitted by Prestige Development Corporation involving the Sinnen property. My report is as follows. Sanitary Sewer and Water. I assume that the necessary steps are being taken to secure the approval of the PCA and Metropolitan Sewer Board to connect this project to the Chanhassen sewer system. Ownership or Unified Control. It is suggested that the developer at this time identify the owner of the tract or the entity responsible for the uni- fied control thereof, and designate whether the ownership or control is vested in an individual, partnership or corporation. It is also suggested that the abstract of title, or registered property abstract, certified to date, be submitted at this time for examination to determine ownership, encum- brances, etc. Indoor Recreation Building. A written statement setting forth the proposed facilities to be installed in the indoor recreation building should be filed with the village at this time. Planning Commission -2- May 24, 1971 Preliminary Plat. It would be helpful if a proposed preliminary plat could be submitted at this time, particularly for those areas proposed for development in 1971-72, showing the data required under the Subdivision Ordinance (street widths, easements for utilities and drainage, lot sizes and general design features) . Non -Dedicated Common Open Space A written statement setting forth the nature of the organization proposed to be employed to own, operate and maintain any non -dedicated common open space and the proposed regulations thereunder. Ver-,.- truly your Russell H. Larson Chanhassen Village Attorney RHL: b 4 s RUSSELL H. LARSON AT-ronwEY AT LAw 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANH BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 May 24, 1971 1.. Planning Commission Village of Chanhassen P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Prestige Development Corporation P-2 Proposed Preliminary Development Plan Gentlemen: TELEPHONE 335--95G5 I have reviewed the P-2 Proposed Development Plan and Statement dated May 17, 1971, submitted by Prestige Development Corporation involving the Sinnen property. My report is as follows. Sanitary- Sewer and Water. I assume that the necessary steps are being taken to secure the approval of the PCA and Metropolitan Sewer Board to connect this project to the Chanhassen sewer system. Ownership or Unified Control. It is suggested that the developer at this time identify the owner of the tract or the entity responsible for the uni- fied control thereof, and designate whether the ownership or control is vested in an individual, partnership or corporation. It is also suggested that the abstract of title, or registered property abstract, certified to date, be submitted at this time for examination to determine ownership, encum- brances, etc. Indoor Recreation Buildinc . A written statement setting forth the proposed facilities to be installed in the indoor recreation building should be filed with the village at this time. O Planning Commission -2- May 24, 1971 Non -Dedicated Common Open Space. A written statement setting forth the nature of the organization proposed to be employed to own, operate and maintain any non -dedicated common open space and the proposed regulations thereunder. RHL:b Very ty ;yours, Russell H. Larson Chanhassen Village Attorney DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL PUD Vi I lage of Chanhassen Planning Commission By: Nason, Wehrman, Chapman Associates, Inc. May 21, 1971 Developer: Prestige Developers Location: South of State Highway 5 and East of State Highway 101 Proposal: To develop a 658 unit housing project (apartment, townhouses and single fam- ily) in the R-lA Agriculture Residence District also consisting of limited commercial serving the development. The site would be developed under the P-2 PLANNED DEVELOP- MENT SECTION of the Village of Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. The proposal request is seeking rezoning of the site from R-IA District to a P-2 District. The Development Site is approximately 80 acres. It is not served internally by any existing streets but is adjacent to T.H. 5 and T.H. 101 . The developers are proposing interior circulation streets servicing the development and providing through access (un- named) for the Chanhassen Estates Second Addition linking to Erie Avenue. ,A service drive paralleling T.H. 5 would also serve the proposed and adjacent sites in conformity to the proposed revisions of the Guide Plan. Surrounding Land Uses: The 31.4 acre parcel directly east is the Second Addition of The, Chanhassen Estates, platted and zoned and being developed as R-1 Single Family Residence District. The area on the north is bounded by T.H. 5 and the American Legion Lodge and baseball field. The area to the south is. Marsh Rice Lake. The area to the east between T.H. 101 and the proposed site consists of five single family homes located within an unplatted area. West of T.H. 101 is agriculture. land (77 acres) open. Relationship to Generalized Guide Plan: The request as submitted would require a revision of land use policy from Single Family Residential to Planned Unit Development adopted by the Planning Commission and Village of Chanhassen. The site is under con- sideration for revision within the proposed land use up -date plan currently under con- sideration. The density for the total area has been defined between 7.5 and 9 per acre depending on the allowances and credits allowed in the P-2 District.. The area is well served with major thoroughfares and proposed crossings accompanied with service drives. The proposed development does consider the adjacent Single Family Subdivision adjacent to the east site by inserting single family units along this perimeter. The developer proposes to dedicate the area adjacent to the Mason dedicated area to the community for public recreation purposes and ties to the Village's linear park system. 16 Development Proposal PUD Village of Chanhassen Developer: Prestige Developers Page 2 May 21, 1971 The developer's plan is proposed in six phases or priorities with apartment development as the first phase located south of the American Legion. Phase two is proposed as the development of the single family units along with Phase 3, the townhouse development on the proposed cul-de-sacs. Conformance to Zoning Ordinance: The density of the project is abou"t 8 units per acreb or a total of 658 units on 80 acres. Floor area regulations are in conformity. The con- struction is scheduled for a five year period as per the site plan proposal. Public utilities which are required have been reviewed by the City Engineer indicating size and location of service lines connecting to the Lake Ann Trunk (proposed). Site Plan Considerations: The arrangement of the elements on the site are related to the pringipal east -west street connecting T.H. 101 to Chanhassen Estates. From this corridor'apartments, townhouses and single family units are dispersed on either side by cul-de-sacs or perime:ter roads. Traffic generated will be primarily westward connecting with T.H. 1d1. Because of the nature of the road systems in the Chan- hassen Estates it is expected that very minimal traffic will flow east from the proposed site. The plan is developed utilizing as much of the natural amenities as feasibly possible.. Slopes are preserved and incorporated into the design concept. The de- veloper has provided excellent areas of open space easily accessible by walking trails and paths from all areas of the site. Parking requirements of the apartment areas should be expanded to comply to the Zoning Ordinance. The site plan accomplishes a excellent screening and view corridor into the garage area design. The site plan has also provided excellent corridor buffering with plantings and shrubs looking into the cul-de-sacs. Each cul- de-sac is designed as a circular drive servicing the dwellings which provides ex- cellent maintenance features. The end of the longest cul-de-sac on the site plan should be slanted west at the cul-de-sac entrance to allow a greater setback and provide better open space be- tween the townhouses on the east side and single family units of the Chanhassen Estates.. This can be done without loss of any of the amenities of the area. The arrangements of the apartments in Phase 4 s�oufd:bo, further studied to assure proper side yard setbacks abutting single family properties. Summary: The plan as submitted is in general conformance with the P-2 District of the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. Its relation to the natural terrain and environ- ment is excellent with approximately 20% of the common open space dedicated for public recreation. If the setbacks of the apartments and townhouses -on the east Development Proposal PUD Village of Chanhassen Developer: Prestige Developers Page 3 May 21, 1971 limits are adjusted to a further distance from the adjacent property the total site would have adequate setbacks and open space between properties. The relation- ship to the major traffic arterials is good. The site is served by good interior cir- culation and connection routes. The action of the Planning Commission could therefore be to approve the zoning with the site plan attached for a Community Planned Unit Project as presented or it could be revised to satisfy the comments of the site analysis or it could be denied. The latter alternative is not recommended and would deter action on other projects with as much imagination and good site development. The site area should be included on the updated Guide Plan for the Village of Chanhassen. Not all of the derails of the site plan are finalized at this time and all permits and final approvals should be subject to the review of the Village Engineer, Building Inspector and Fire Chief. Although these details need not be part of the concept plan their recommendations should be incorporated in the minutes to give direction to the developer for preparation of the final plans at the building permit stage. k Lm.D @m i� OA .ee•°••°.ice �••� tee° . °e-o- -. a o- • -o e• • . e• •• o •o • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • p e • ° • • • 0, •eo•,•.p•oeo•°°gip•••-o os� a-004,i :� e• i i • •°•i.°•°°•e•e•• 1°� •e•••• •e•i 00 Y.••�• • • • • o • ` • • • • • p • • • • ♦ ... p O • p • • . • . p . • .. • • • e e 00 f S:a•i •�e•o••1: i:•°.°°:e..:°•••••°� • _ ® e°s e•:•s �•e o• oe.o•: i i •i .e•�o •per-:i•°� 'a •� °1•e ••O°°•:...°•e•. •:0 •p•..•••°°••••••°• •• 4009690. ••e •e••e°°•• �.•• �.�p•.°0.00.00 •.p.o� •• •e0•°•e •e s0 0 • °eeoe es•oe °� •• :•: -p O-Q -p • • - p ,p• ep p 0 e me �0•0e p •e•e.. •••oe s•p •-p•° °• °�s•�• :••°j.°e••woeei•�•ei•o•°�1! A4u • •°•op •.••re•p •-•so• pel t.•••.•p°pao.e••-••.••so•i e�� -.vo•e•eoo..oi.ee�•-�••: ••••� •°°••p °.o•-tee e..e.. o-••su :::• 13 II•,p•••�e.o eme•000• o •.-pe• be••is°.s��opooeo•o� �po.e•poe� b••••°o°•••• �•• �e••eo•00�0 j e o sr d • sii-•�o•0••000 �. �•e •d••o p• �• e.• o eo• • • •ee :��e• �ee•o• s'o'oe•eo.� .eee • oor . o • • e o •• •o•e •e e.••• 0 0000• • • ••. • •� •e•.• • • 1 •e• 0••••o•e.•°•.O •o•.•.°•O•°-••� •ee•e••- •. • •. •. •••e O • •, •- -• -• a ••p. •ee •• p • ••. .o a;.-.o .ee•-. ••e.•O•es-oe °j .•i .•O•e .. ••• • .p • ••--see ° • • • 0000 *90 00 p • p .e - - • . s . •- • - - O • • • • • . • . • a . j • • a 1 .°.-e.. �.•p•p--.oee.� -e�••e epee e.ep•.-..• • o e.. o• • e-op.p p p-o.•ee-• • -..• e • • • p.p.e- • •�•-• - •e-.e .- • • • • •�� a°oe•ooi�••��•:•°�•i..°•86. °°8: •••o° i•e • •°•.•e •°••.•O e•.-p•.°•••°p p•�.• ••• ••pe m Rica 6 2 a TION August 8, 1.973 Mayor and Village Council Village of Chanhassen Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Messrs. and Madam: Enclosed herewith are the following: a revised copy of the, Woodhill Subdivision preliminary plan, revised preliminary development plan, general comments on revised development plan, and comments on various reports and letters that have been addressed to the Village Planning Commission. The development plan has been revised in accordance with the request of the Village Planning Commission. This information is being provided to you at this time to assist you in your evaluation of this project. We understand that this project is scheduled for your consideration on Monday, August 13, 1973. We are in receipt of the Village Engineer's letter of July 31, 1973, asking if McKeon Construction would be interested in building the balance of the frontage road from our east pro- perty line to Dakota Avenue in lieu of constructing the turn lanes at Highways 101 and 5. This is an acceptable arrangement with us as we also would like to see the frontage road com- pleted with construction of the first phase of our project. This plan was first presented to the Planning Commission on April 24, 1973. The land had -previously been zoned P-2 Planned Unit development and the plan presented is in accordance with this plan. The McKeon plan,as originally presented, consisted of 554 units. This has now been revised until the plan now contains 5D2 units. The total number of units has been reduced Minneapolis Division, 7601 Kentucky Avenue North, Suite 103, Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55,428, (612) 425-4023 Mayor & Village Council Chanhassen, MN Page 2 one-fourth from the number of units previously proposed for this property by another developer. The previous plan had been approved. The Woodhill plan density is 400 of that allowed in a P-2 zoning.. The revisions to the plan are the result of several meetings with the Planning Commission and staff. We feel the plan, as now presented, reflects the thoughts of the majority of those who have been interested and concerned about this pro- posed project. a)ry truly yours, Mc_.EON CONS TRUC I � r Joseph LaFromboise JL/mg cc: Village Attorney Village Engineer Village Planner Revised 8-7-73 WOOD HILL SUBDIVISION EXHIBIT A LAND USE DETAILS Dwelling Units (Acres D.U./Ac.l ! Population! ( Number of cars I Car Trips PHASE I Apartments 72 7.24 9:94; 108 91 355 Patio Homes 104 12.73 8.17 229, 135 514 Single Family 14 5.86 2.39 49 27 100 TOTAL PHASE I 190 25.83 7.36 386 253 969 PHASE II Apartments 60 3.87 15..50. 89 75 293 Patio Homes 76 7.95 9.56 167 99 376 TOTAL PHASE II 136 11.82 11.51 256 174 669 PHASE III Apartments 48 2.39 20.08 72 61 238 Patio Homes 80 9.02. 8.87 176 104 395 TOTAL PHASE III 128 11.411 11.22 248 165 633 PHASE IV Patio Homes 48 5.65 8.50 106. 62. 23ti- Commercial .71 Park 17 9 2_- -- Lake & Marsh 20: TOTALS 502 83.71 6.00_ 996 654 -2,507 Unit Type 1 Bedroom Apartment 2 Bedroom Apartment Patio Home Single Family DESIGN DATA Avg. Daily Ponulation/D.U. Cars/D.U. Tr s/Car 1.1 1 3.9 1.7 1.4 3.9 2.2 1.3 3.8 3.5 1.9 3.7 11'evl6eu a- 1- i 3 SUMMARY OF LAND USE INTENSITIES, BEDROOM,MIXES, PARKING FACILITIES AND BUILDING GROUND COVERAGES FOR WOOPHILL A P-2 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LAND USE INTENSITY: Total Acres - 83.71 Total Dwelling Units - 502 Dwelling Units Per Acre - 6.00. BEDROOM MIX: Total Apartments One Bedroom Two Bedroom Total Patio Homes Total Detached Single Family PARKING FACILITIES Total Residential Parking Spaces Apartment Sapces Covered - 180 Open - 180 Patio Home Spaces Covered - 308 Detached Private Tandem - 308 Single Family Spaces Additional Offstreet Guest Spaces BUILDING GROUND COVERAGE: Total Building Ground Coverage Apartments & Related Covered Parking Patio Homes & Related Covered Parking Detached Single Family - 60 - 120 - 360 - 616 - 28 - 56 MENW-El - 308 - 14 - 1060 - 9.90 Acres (11.82% of Tot Land Area) - 2.20 Acres - 7.30 Acres - .40 Acres WOODHILL SUBDIVISION MCKEON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY General Comments on Revised Preliminary Development Plan - August 7, 1973 As a result of comments at the Planning Commission Meeting of July 24, 1973, the following revisions have been made to the preliminary development plan. The revised development plan is attached. . Forty-eight patio homes or 12 buildings have been eliminated from the plan. Twelve units or three buildings have been relocated on the plan, Apartment No. 5 was relocated to the commercial area and it was also necessary to relocate two patio home buildings in order to accommo- date the apartment building and its associated parking. The resulting overall densities are as shown on the development plan and on the attached Exhibit A, Land Use details. . I The residential lots have been increased from nine to 14 and the area in the southwest corner of the development adjacent to Dakota Lane has been left for use as park and open space area. The boundary between Chanhassen Estates and the Woodhill Subdivision in the north area is being accomplished by the addition of single family lots, together with an earthen berm to be placed in the open area that will be landscaped and planted. An earthen berm will also be left between the new service road and the existing Highway 5. It is also proposed to build all of the service road along Highway 5 from 101 to the northwest orner of Chanhassen Estates and the developer is agreeable to building the service road through Chanhassen Estates to Dakota Avenue in lieu of building the turn lane and acceleration lane on Highway 101 and 5. . With relocating the Apartment Building 5 to the previous commercial area, the office area has been eliminated and will be replaced with a commercial area to be constructed in Phase IV. Sufficient room should now be available in the southeast corner of the property to develop an additional ball field to conform with the request of the Parks and Recreation Commission. WOODHILL SUBDIVISION MCKEON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Comments to Village Planner's Letter of April 23, 1973 - Revised May 25, 1973 The items in the Planner's report to which we wish to make comment are as follows: 3. The service station has been eliminated. The active play areas have been relocated away from the single family homes and the access road pattern at Highway 101 has been changed for safety reasons. 4. The private roads are 25 foot in width, with driveways to the patio homes being a minimum of 20 feet; therefore, there is ample room for snow plowing of the private street system. 'In addition to the two parking stalls per patio home, one covered and one uncovered, there are 56 additional off street parking stalls in -the patio home area.. Also, each apartment unit is provided with one covered and one uncovered parking stall. The private street system will be built to the same design load as the public streets; that is 7 ton street. To differentiate between the public street and the private street, curb and gutter will be placed on the public streets while the private streets will not have curb and gutter. This will define the public streets. 5. This information has been furnished by additional drawings and a copy of the proposed Home Owners Association agreements have been fur- nished to the Village Attorney. . 7. The Public Land Dedication (Rice -Marsh Lake) will be included in the first subdivision plat that is filed with the Phase I. 8. Easements for utilities and road right-of-way dedication will be included on the plat as shown on the preliminary plat which has been submitted. Any other easements which are felt necessary, can be included on the final plat. 9. It is proposed to provide screening along the eastern boundary at the northeastern corner of the project adjacent to the Chanhassen Estates Project to leave the berm on the north side of the frontage road between the frontage road and Highway 5 and to provide screening on the western boundary of the project in Phases II, III and IV. 12. All single family lots will be included in the first plat.. 13. We have not received specific instructions as to what additional right-of-way is required for future improvement of Highway 101. The Highway Department has indicated that they feel no additional right-of- way is necessary. If, however, it�is, arrangements can be made to accom- modate the right-of-way. The north -south public street not shown on the preliminary plat is shown on the proposed development plan and will be dedicated in the second and third plats. 14. The public utility easements are shown on the plat. WOODHILL SUBDIVISION MCKEON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Comments on Village Planner's Report of June 22, 1973 In regard to the traffic, the lots have been eliminated that would enter onto Dakota Lane; therefore, there will be no traffic from the Woodhill project in this area. As has been previously discussed, if all of the frontage road from Dakota Avenue to Highway 101 can be constructed initially, then this should eliminate some of the problems in concern for 80th Street. Prior to sale of any of the units, all pending assessments on the property would be paid, then any assessment 'costs that are incurred after that time can be handled in conformance with state statutes. Additional soils information will be obtained before design of Phases II, III and IV.can be undertaken. It is anticipated that gas lights would be utilized to provide street lighting. WOODHILL SUBDIVISION MCKEON"7CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Reply to Comments of Village Engineer's Report of June 25, 1973 ROADS AND DRAINAGE It is now proposed that all of the frontage road in the Woodhill Subdivision would be developed with Phase I as is shown on the revised proposed development plan (revised August 7, 1973). Also on this matter in regard to Mr. Schoell's letter of July 31, regarding the building of the frontage road in Chanhassen Estates, the developer is willing to build this road in lieu of building the turn lane and acceleration lanes along Highway 101 and Highway 5. This would then complete this frontage road from Dakota Avenue in Chanhassen Estates to Highway 101 in the first phase of construction. We feel that from a traffic engineering standpoint, the -intersection of 80th Street and the eastern most street in the subdivision should be left as shown. Since the street is making actually a 90' intersection at the point on curve with 80th Street. The total amount of storm sewer and drainage structures necessary wiii have to be determined when the final street profiles are prepared and it is concurred that additional storm sewer pipe and catch basins will be necessary in the Phase I area. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER We are in agreement that again minor modifications of the sanitary sewer and water layouts can be made when the final building arrangements are determined and the final plans for construction are prepared. WOODHILL SUBDIVISION MCKEON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Reply to Village Attorney`s.Letter of June 26,. 1973 If easements are required along the side or rear lot lines for utili- ties., they can be incorporated on the final plat when it is prepared. The street width and lot square footages are now shown on the preliminary plat. As previously discussed, the private streets will be built to Village standards. The issue of ingress and egress via 80th Street has also been pre- viously discussed with the utilization of the frontage road. The Rice -Marsh Lake Dedication will be made on the first plat. The proposed Home Owners Association By -Laws, Articles of Incorporation and Covenants Conditions Restrictions will be the same as those utilized for Stonybrook, which were the ones that had been furnished to the attorney. WOODHILL SUBDIVISION MCKEON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Comments to Site Plan Review By USDA Soil Conservation Service - May 24, 1973 The conservation practices and erosion control practices as sug- gested by the Soil Conservation Service are basically the same as those suggested by the Riley -Purgatory Creek Watershed District and their suggestions will be incorporated into the final development plans. A preliminary soil investigation has been conducted for -McKeon Construction by Subterranean Engineering, Inc. in the Phase I develop- ment area. The soil conditions on the property investigated appear to be quite uniform in the Phase I area and only two basic soil types were encountered within the first 20 feet below ground. The soil types con- sist of a surfact topsoil layer and an underlying clayey and silty glacial till. The analysis and recommendations of the report indicate. that the soil and groundwater conditions at this site are very favorable for a development of the type proposed. All buildings on this project can be supported on conventional relatively shallow spread footing foundations. There appear to be no problems with regard to drainage and use of the soil; however, consideration of the soils and terrain will be taken into consideration in the development of the working drawings of the project. Provisions will be made for proper drainage away from the building and slope protection of the areas which are excavated. WOODHILL SUBDIVISION: MCKEON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Reply to Riley - Purgatory.Creek Watershed District Report of July 2, 1973 The following reply to the Riley - Purgatory Creek Watershed Dis- trict Report is numbered to correspond with the numbers in their report. 1. Three of the patio homes have been eliminated from Phase IV of the development. These homes were at or near the flood plain elevation of 879. It is further understood that in preparing the final plans for construction, that detailed information will be submitted to -the Watershed District prior to work in this area. 2. The drainage way will be protected from erosion through the use of properly designed rip rap and again final storm sewer plans when prepared, will be submitted to the Watershed District. 3. The developer is in agreement that a sediment control plan is necessary and this also will be'developed along with the final construc- tion plans. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR WOOD HILL A P-2 Planned Unit Development Chanhassen, Minnesota May 9, 1973 Applicant: McKeon Construction 1550 Northwest Highway Park Ridge, Illinois 60068 (312) 297-7620 • McKeon Construction hereby makes application to the Village of Chanhassen, Minnesota for approval of a prelimin- ary development plan dated April 27, 1973, as revised and hereinafter referred to as Exhibit C, and a preliminary plat of Wood Hill dated May 9, 1973, hereinafter referred to as Exhibit E and made a part thereof. The relationship of the subject property to surround- ing areas is outlined on the Village's Zoning Map dated February, 1972 and is made a part hereof as Exhibit B. Also, a legal description of the Wood Hill property is -incorporated herein as Exhibit A. The applicant, McKeon Construction, entered into an agreement with Presco, a partnership, located at 6975 Washington Avenue, south, Edina, Minnesota 55435, on March 15, 1973, for the purchase of the property described herein as Exhibit A. Wood.Hill is envisioned as a four year planned unit development consisting of 180 rental apartments, 360 for sale condominiums, 9 detached single family homes, and approximately 1.5 acres designated for convenience shopping and professional Offices. A schematic drawing of the exist- ing tree cover, proposed buildings, parking facilities, streets, open spaces, and recreation areas is shown on the preliminary development plan and incorporated Herein as Exhibit C. Also, the land use intensities, proposed - 2 - development phases, population densities and other relevant statistics are incorporated in a schedule hereinafter re- ferred to as Exhibit D and made a part hereof. The pro- posed development stages are shown schematically on Exhibit E. Under separate cover, we are providing the.Village with preliminary floor plans and elevations.of all buildings, except the single family homes, as well as a proposed form of covenants, declarations and by-laws regulating the estab- lishment, use, maintenance and.'continued stability of the planned development and common areas. Respectfully submitted, McKEON CONS TION Franklin A. Martin Vice President may 9, 1973 LEGAL DESCRIPTION HIBI i A Par. 1 That part of the West Hal-` 5 Oi ih: N airlFiti4sl QuarterDT $?et',in ?. iC3W,IshiN 11u North, "a-rige 23 '-lest OT ;he 5t, p" -:-4 �� Meridian lyingsouth ' s nl s' n �3 :-1i.: Meridian o i 1h Sy:ic.ti�?'ly �'Sg�t'-roi-:gay '47E12 'Jf Sr,�,�'2rf7g:1'.•F3j! T'io. a as describe d In Boo!;." 11 n Misr�;laii?�iES 3tv�aQc� �� -i �e Ofri: "f' -1h so __ , re�J� 42£� 7 t,... 1 r'► v 1.17z �fJ-'r of �lp'ir�1 i t`t ti /+ _ .".r _ I-Ou. s o 2 Carver, EXA r' the trio i•olIowin-, descrlaed tracts a, land. Said tracts are described T descs ibed as fcl try c�.s are � o;�s o The west 353.00 feet of the s oiut h- 270.00) 1 ee L c; the west Half o, the Northeast Quarter of said Serytion3. 2. The ices t "3,00 feet of the north 303- 00 e2t of the south 573.00 TC-t a th4 ;test '#elf of the t;ortheas Quarter of said Section 12. And ai5o EXCEPT t,`iat part of the first above described VIM�rep�r�y Wch lies ncrt. erly and westerly o f . the fol l owling described line. _ laid lire is described as.failows: Co,�,encinq at t,1e northwes� o0rvier cf the 1 est Half of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 13: thence so,,- r � . thee r 1 ti t , • J �{ =Jt l,•i e ��,est I 3nz ofsaid .4 �!alf of the 'rtort:*�east quarter a M.dis}a�tce of 1272.70 feet to- the beginni;ig of the line to b- desrr;hed; thence easterly, at ri jet angles CO said westline, . 'a distance of 656.00 feet; thence no ri nrl�'at righfi anciles a distance of 413.15 feet-, more or less;- to the inter eles with thy. southerly ri ght--of-:qay l i n of said «i cr€ ay and said line. there term; iratirg.._ And also EXCEPT 1"hat part of the lQst dial F ;the PtotRt#tQast Quarter of Section 13, Township 116 North, P.ange 23 ;-hest of .the`St Pri*:Lipal Meridian described as- follows Comencing at'the northwest corner of srid 'We st Half of the Nlortheast Quarter; thence south, along the we line of said West Half of the northeast Quarter, a distance of 1272.7ru) feet to the point of beginning of tre land to be described. thence eas :, at right angles to said West pine, a distance of.655. 0 feet; thence south,. at a right angle, a distance of 150.00 feet; thence wast, at a right angle, a distance Of 656.00 feet to the viest iii-le Of said :test Half of the Northeast- Quarter; thence north, all,:a sight angle, along said west line, ' -a distance of 150:00 feet to the point' of beginning. Par. 2. 1-h a Na t-, � t- Ouartc!r of t7 - Jo Lilyi{past Quarter of Section 13, Township 115 P;orf.:7, Range 23 12st of the 5th P-Mncipal i'erid3a;i, except the west 353.00 Feet of the north 270.00 feet thereof. SUBJECT to easements of record. EXHIBIT D SUMMARY OF LAND USE INTENSITIES, BEDROOM MIXES,'PARKING FACILITIES, BUILDING GROUND COVERAGES, DEVELOPMENT PHASES, AND POPULATION PROJECTIO • WOOD HILL A P-2 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LAND USE INTENSITY: Total Acres - 83.42 Total Dwelling Units - 549 Dwelling Units Per Acre - 6.55 BEDROOM MIX:. Total Apartments 180 One Bedroom - 60 Two Bedroom - 120 Total Patio-. Homes - 360 All Two Bedroom Total Detached Single Family - 9 Average Three Bedroom PARKING FACILITIES: Total Residential Parking Spaces - 1164 Apartment Spaces -.360 Covered - 180 Open - 180 Patio Home Spaces - 720 Covered - 360 Detached Private Tandem - 360 Single Family Spaces - 18 Additional Off-street Guest Spaces - 66 BUILDING GROUND COVERAGE: Total Building Ground Coverage - 9.90 Acres (11.86% c Total Lar. Area) Apartments & Related Covered Parking - 2.20 Acres Patio Homes & Related Covered Parking - 7.40 Acres Detached Single Family - .30 Acres - continued - - 2 - EXHIBIT D (CONT'D DEVELOPMENT PHASES & POPULATION PROJECTIONS: Total Projected Phase Units Population Phase I 171 352 Phase II 149 326 Phase III 153 338 Phase IV 76 190 Totals: 549 1206 Anticipated Construction Period Sumner, 1973 Summer, 1974 Summer, 1975 Summer, 1976 GEORGE NELSON ASSOCIATES February 1, 1984 Mr. Scott Martin Planner/HRA Executive Director City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Scott: I enjoyed meeting with you and discussing my interest in the site in Chanhassen. It is my Tntent to call you soon regarding an appointment to discuss this property further. Thank you for your help in this matter. Sin ely, George N. Nelson GNN/gbn Encl. CITY OF CHANHASSEN rF8 1984 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT REAL ESTATE • 1777 Knox Avenue South • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 • (612) 374-9709 Case No. Date Issued: Village of Chanhassen, Minnesota PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT USE PERMIT Address: Highway No. 5 and No. 101 Legal Description: Par. I. That part of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian lying south of the southerly right-of-way line of State Highway No. 5 as described in Book "Z" of Miscellaneous at Page 60, recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds, County of Carver, EXCEPT the two following described tracts of land. Said tracts are described as follows: 1. The west 353.00 feet of the south 270.00 feet of the west Half of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 13. 2. The west 193.00 feet of the north 303.00 feet of the south 573.00 feet of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 13. And also EXCEPT that part of the first above described property which lies northerly and westerly of the following described line. Said line is described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 13; thence southerly along the west line of said West Half of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 1272.70 feet to the beginning of the line to be described; thence easterly, at right angles to said west line, a distance of 656.00 feet; thence northerly at right angles a distance of 418.15 feet, more or less to the intersection with the southerly right-of-way line of said highway, and said line there terminating. And also EXCEPT That part of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said West Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence south, along the west line of said West Half of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 1272.70 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence east, at right angles to said West line, a distance of 656.00 feet; thence south, at a right angle, a distance of 150.00 feet; thence west, at aright angle, a distance of 656.00 feet to the west line of said West Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence north, at a right angle, along said west line, a distance of 150.00 feet to the point of beginning. Par. 2. The Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, except the west 353.00 feet of the north 270.00 feet thereof. SUBJECT to easements of record. Applicant: McKeon Construction Address: _ 1550 Northwest Hishway__, Park Ridge, Illinois, 60068 Owner (if different from applicant): PRESCO (Partnership) Address: 6975 Washington Avenue South, Edina, Minnesota 55435 Zoning District: P-2 Planned Unit Development Permitted Uses: 1. All uses permitted in the P-2 PUD zoning district and subject to the applicable regulations contained in the Municipal Code and further subject to the conditions of this PUD use permit; and 2. A planned unit development of commercial uses, multi -family dwellings, single-family homes, accessory parking, open space, and others as specifically noted onthe attached approved development plans, dated marked with the file and permit No. and duly signed by tt the Code.Enforcement Officer. (Uses permied _ in the P-2 Planned Unit Development District as regulated therein and further subject to the following. Special Conditions or Restrictions as Imposed: All permitted uses shall be subject to the following special conditions or restrictions as imposed by the Village Council: General 1. All construction shall be in compliance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the Village of Chanhassen except as modified herein 2. More detailed and complete site and building plans may be required from time -to -time as development proceeds within the project area -2- in accordance with the approved stage development program. 3. The conditions of this permit are applied to the land involved and shall not be affected by any subsequent sale, lease, subdivision, or other change in ownership status except as noted herein. 4. Any requests for major deviation from the approved plans shall require a public hearing and consideration by the Village Council. The Planning Commission shall determine what is "major". 5. Where there are particular difficulties or unnecessary hardships resulting from the application of the strict letter of the con- ditions of this PUD Use Permit, an appeal may be made and a variance may be granted as provided for in the municipal code of the Village of Chanhassen. 6. This Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission and Village Council once each year and may be modified, extended, or cancelled in whole or in part based upon considerations affecting the public health, safety, convenience, or general welfare. COMPONENTS a. Land Use Component Description: A Land Use Component shall consist of a map or maps, setting forth the distribution, location and extent of the acres of land devoted to each category of land use proposed as part of the General Plan of Development. Requirements: 1. Only these uses listed herein as permitted and or as indicated on the approved plans shall be provided for on the site. 2. Land uses permitted shall be located, constructed, occupied, and maintained in accordance with the provisions of this permit and approved plans made a part of this permit. 3. Major and significant deviations from the approved plans shall require an amended permit prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Uses permitted in the areas designated for commercial shall be those permitted in the P-2 Zoning district, as noted on the approved site plans. Other uses proposed in the future that would require a use permit in other than the P-2 district shall be permitted only by amendment to this planned unit development use permit. 5. Each phase of construction of dwelling units is hereby granted concept approval only and building permits shall not be issued until detailed site plans are submitted for review by the Planning Commission and approved by the Village Council. -3- b_ Circulation Component Description: A Circulation Component shall consist of a map or maps, setting forth the location and extent of all transportation facilities proposed as part of the General Plan of Development. Requirements: I. Parking lots and drives shall be surfaced and concrete curbing installed as directed by the Village Council. 2. Plans and specifications for any access drives, private or public streets, or utilities to be constructed by the developer must be approved by the Village Engineer. The developer shall also supply the Engineer with any other data, plans, or as-builts that he may require. 3. Adequate right-of-way as requested by the County, Village Engineer, or other governmental agency shall be dedicated as requested for any and all public right-of-way needs. 4. Title to all right-of-way and easements shown on the development plan must be provided to the Village prior to the issuance of a building permit as may be requested. 5. All utility installation and layouts must be approved by the Village Engineer prior to construction. 6. All parking and drive areas (public and private).must be of a bituminous or concrete material and the method of installation of said drive and parking areas must be approved by the Village Engineer. 7. Concrete curbs must be provided on the perimeter of all parking and drive areas. 8. Traffic routes for the hauling of materials, earth and building equipment to and from the site, and the time of said hauling must be approved by the Village Engineer. 9. All streets (public and private) shall be constructed in accordance with a sbhedule approved by the Village Engineer. -4- C. Population Component Description: A Population Component shall contain a descriptive statement of the standards of population density and building intensity for the various proposed land uses, including estimates of future population characteristics and change within the planned community correllated with the other components of the General Plan of Development. The supporting data shall include, but not be limited to, dwelling (housing) units per acre for the various residential uses proposed; and square footage by type for the various non- residential facilities including sufficient data to calculate traffic generation, parking requirements, water consumption, sewage needs and the necessary capacity of related utilities and services traditionally rendered by public or private organizations for a population of such size as is projected for the completed, planned development. Requirements: 1. The number of dwelling units by type (number of bedrooms) shall be as specifically authorized and noted on plans to be submitted for review,and approved, and attached to.and made a part of this permit. 2. At this time, approval is given only to the land use concept proposal with respect to multiple family development. Building permits for construction of multiple family dwellings units shall be subject to'submission of more detailed plans, review by the Planning Commission, and approval by the Village Council. 3. Conditions applied to the future issuance of building permits shall be added to and made part of this planned unit special use permit. d. Subdivision Design Component Description: A Subdivision Design Component shall contain a descriptive statement of the principles governing the proposed subdivision of land including lot design for various proposed land uses. This Component shall be in sufficient detail so that it can serve as the basis for determining the conformity of any site plan to the General Plan of Development. Requirements: 1. No part of the development shall be sold or otherwise transferred from single ownership except under terms of an approved sub- division, condominium arrangement, or other approved method. 2. The common areas, nor any portion thereof, shall be sold or otherwise transferred from control of approved Home Owners Associations or other approved control except as may be permitted by an amendment to this Permit. 3 Effect of Minimum Area Requirements of Conveyed Lots or Building Sites. In the event any real property in the approved PUD permit is conveyed in total or in part, the buyers thereof shall be bound -5- by the provisions of the PUD permit and the General Development Plan constituting a part thereof; provided, however, that nothing herein shall be construed to create non -conforming lots, building sites, buildings or uses by virtue of any such conveyance of a lot, building, site building or part of the development created pursuant to and in conformance with the PUD permit. Subsequent structural additions or alterations may be made provided the provisions of the PUD permit, Zoning Ordinance and other applicable Ordinances are adhered to. 4. It is hereby noted that approval of the general plan of development constitutes preliminary subdivision approval and public hearing requirements for said approval have been met. All final sub- divisions, however, shall require approval by the Village Council which shall make a determination if the final subdivision plans are in substantial conformity to the approved General Plan of Development and the subdivision component of the planned unit special use permit. e. Services and Facilities Component Description: A Services and Facilities Component shall contain a map or maps setting forth the general location and extent of any and all existing and proposed systems for sewage, domestic water supply and distribution, refuse disposal, drainage, local utilities and rights -of -way, easements, facilities and appurtenances necessary therefor as well as a detailed statement describing the proposed ownership, method of operation, and maintenance of each such service and facility. Requirements: 1• (Recreation use areas, pedestrian trails, buildings, common open space or parking and other joint facilities.) Certain land areas and structures are provided within the planned unit development for private recreational use or as service facilities. The owner of such land and buildings shall enter into an agreement with the Village to assure the continued operation and maintenance to a pre- determined reasonable standard. These common areas may be placed under ownership of one of the following depending which is more appropriate and as may be approved by the Village Council. a. Dedicated to public where a community -wide use would be anticipated. b. Dedicated to public as a special assessment district or easement•: c. Landlord control. d. Landowners Association, provided all of the following conditions are met: I. The Landowners Association must be established prior to any sale. II. Membership must be mandatory for each owner, and any successive buyer. III. The open space restrictions must be permanent, not for a given period of years. IV. The Association must be responsible for liability insurance, local taxes, and public improvement assessments, and the maintenance of residential and other facilities, except as modified by the Village Council. V. Landowners must pay their pro rata share of the cost and the assessment levied by the association that can become a lien on the property. VI. The Association must be able to adjust the assessment to meet changed needs. e. Condominium arrangement. 2. Landscaping, as per the approved plans, shall be completely installed around each principal building following its completion. The entire area around each principal building shall be completely land- scaped within 210 days following the completion and occupancy of that building. 3. Landscaping shall be properly maintained and replaced if damaged or lost by winterkill, drought, or other causes. This condition shall apply to existing trees and other landscaping proposed to be retained. 4. Easements for utilities or other purposes shall be provided as requested by the Village. 5. Provisions for sanitary sewer, public water, surface water drainage, and other utilities shall be made as required by the Village Engineer. 6. Easements or other provisions for pedestrian or other trails to be part of the comprehensive trail or pedestrian circulation system shall be provided as directed and approved by the Planning Commission. 7. The Rice -Marsh Lake open space area shall be dedicated to the Village as part of the first phase of development. f. Construction Order Component Description: The Construction Order Component shall contain a map or maps setting forth the proposed chronological order of construction relating each proposed use and structure and to the construction of the various services and facilities as may be required herein. Said Component shall include estimated completion dates and shall specify the proposed order of request for utility release or other authority to occupy completed structures so as to provide a basis for determining the adequacy of the related services and facilities for each separate construction phase. Requirements: I. All public and private development shall proceed in accordance with an approved stage development program and no building or other construction permits shall be issued except in accordance with said program. 2. Staging shall be as approved by the Village Engineer and Code Enforcement Officer. 3. That part of the plan indicated as being Phase No. 1 shall not be granted building permits until such time that final and detailed plans and specifications have been approved by the Village Council. Construction on Phase No. 1 shall not commence until plans for sanitary sewer, road access, and other area wide considerations have been approved by the Village Council in sufficient detail to assure proper staging and coordination of all public and private development. Additional Components Description: The General Plan of Development may include such other Components as need is indicated by the nature of the particular proposed development. Requirements: 1. Trash, garbage, wastes, and other refuse shall be stored and dis- posed of in the manner as indicated on the approved plans. 2. Exterior storage of wastes, junk cars, boats, camper units, and Other miscellaneous storage other than normal, approved vehicular parking shall be permitted only if specifically authorized by conditions of this permit. 3. No identification, rental, advertising, directional, or other signs shall be permitted except those specifically authorized by the Code Enforcement Officer and shown on the approved plans as part of this permit. 4. Dwelling units, commercial buildings, or other structures shall not be occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the Village. 5. Interior and exterior fire prevention, warning and other safety features shall be installed and maintained as directed by the Fire Department and Code Enforcement Officer. Any appeal to said requirements shall be made directly to the Village Council who may alter the requirements and said alterations shall be made part of this permit. 6. Accessory uses such as party rooms, day nurseries, and the like shall be permitted only if specifically authorized and listed as a permitted use in this permit. 7. Bonding to Assure Conformance to General Plan of Development and Agreements. To assure that any improvements specified as part of the General Plan of Development (or necessary as a pre -requisite to a utility release) are completed under the terms of said plan or each phase as outlined in the Plan or in any agreements executed with the Village Council according to the provisions of this Permit, the applicant shall post a corporate surety bond, cash bond or other guarantee for the faithful performance of the work or agreements and the payment of any costs to the Village in a sum equal to the total as recommended by the Code Enforcement Officer and Village Engineer and approved by the Village Council. Furthermore, prior to certification of the Site Plans required by this Permit, the Code Enforcement Officer and Village Engineer shall also determine the amount of corporate surety bond or cash bond shall cover each separate facility, landscaping, or utility required as part of each phase of development as outlined in the approved Use Permit and in the General Plan of Development, as the case may be; provided, however, that part of the corporate surety bond or cash bond may be released when any specific part of each phase is completed, upon recommendation of the Engineer and approval by the Village Council. 8. Prior to occupancy of any dwelling unit, a fee shall be paid to the Village for recreation area needs created by the development in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No. 14. Said fees, however, may be refunded in total or in part provided it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Council that all normal neighborhood type recreation facilities for the population served have been provided on the site and/or the Rice -Marsh Lake public area. Generally accepted standards for the provision of recreation sites and facilities will be utilized to determine the extent to which recreation requirements have been met. In any event, all proposed recreation areas and facilities shall be as indicated on the approved plans. 9. All development and uses shall be subject to annual inspection by the Village for purposes of assuring continued conformity to the provisions of the permit. 10. All structures and grounds shall be properly and well maintained at all times. 11. Land uses permitted shall be located, constructed, occupied, and maintained in accordance with the provisions of this permit and approved plans made part of this permit. 12. All maps, reports and other documents attached to this permit which are properly approved and filed shall be considered as a part of this permit and shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and are hereby made a part of this permit. 13. Security lighting shall be installed, maintained, and operated as directed by the Code Enforcement Officer. 14. Special precautions as directed by the Village Engineer and Code Enforcement Officer shall be taken both during and after construction to assure against the following: 1. Silting from grading or any other sourcd or cause. 2. Erosion (wind or water). 3. Pollution of any type. 15. All conditions recommended by the Village Engineer attached hereto and approved by the Village Council are a part of and conditions to this permit. 16. All right-of-way, easements, or other ublicprovided at no public expense; this conditionrshalleappuienl shall be the future closing of any access drives that may be requiredsinto that any driveway or other alterations required on private 'property to accomodate said closings shall be accomplished at the expense of the land owner affected. Any access noted as being temporary under conditions of the PUD use permit shall be abandoned when requested by the Village and at no public cost. 17. Conditions of this planned unit development use permit may be amended or added to as planning and development proceeds. -10-