Loading...
11-10-2025 City Council Agenda and PacketA.5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Note: Unless otherwise noted, work sessions are held in the Training Room in the lower level of City Hall and are open to the public. If the City Council does not complete the work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda. Public comment is not allowed at the work session. A.1 2026 Utility Fund Budgets, 2026 Utility Rates, and 2026-2030 Utility Fund CIP A.2 Pleasant View Road Improvement Project A.3 Sign Code Discussion A.4 Future Work Session Schedule B.7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance) C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS D.CONSENT AGENDA All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to the council packet for each staff report. D.1 Approve City Council Meeting Minutes dated October 27, 2025 D.2 Approve City Council Work Session Minutes dated October 27, 2025. D.3 Receive Park and Recreation Commission Minutes dated August 26, 2025 D.4 Receive Commission on Aging Minutes dated August 15, 2025 D.5 Receive Commission on Aging Minutes dated September 19, 2025 AGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2025 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD 1 D.6 Approve Claims Paid dated November 10, 2025 D.7 2025 Well Rehabilitation Project D.8 Approve Permanent Stormwater Ownership and Maintenance Agreement for Avienda Apartments D.9 Dogwood Right-of-Way Vacation D.10 Partial Release of Planned Unit Development Agreement (951 W 78th Street) D.11 Approve SCALE Hardware and Software Purchase with Computer Integrated Technologies (CIT) D.12 Resolution 2025-XX: Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County for the Mill Street Trail Improvement Project D.13 Resolution 2025-XX: Call Public Improvement Hearing for the 2026 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 26-01 E.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda). F.FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE G.PUBLIC HEARINGS G.1 Resolution 2025-XX: Accept Feasibility Study, Conduct Public Improvement Hearing, and Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the 2026 Great Plains Blvd/Lake Dr East Rehabilitation Project No. 26-02 G.2 Lake Minnewashta Slow No Wake Public Hearing H.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS I.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS J.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION J.1 Third Quarter 2025 Economic Development Activity Report J.2 Third Quarter 2025 Communications Update K.CLOSED SESSION K.1 Discuss Acquisition of PID 25.8680100, a tax-forfeited parcel L.GENERAL BUSINESS L.1 Discuss Acquisition of PID 25.8680100, a tax-forfeited parcel 2 M.ADJOURNMENT GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations. Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required to complete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available at https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior to the meeting. A total of thirty minutes is alloted for Visitor Presentations. Priority is given to Chanhassen residents. An additional thirty minutes may be provided after General Business items are complete at the discretion of the City Council. Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City Council. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson that can summarize the issue. Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. Comments may also be emailed to the City Council at council@chanhassenmn.gov. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be directed to the City Manager. Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Tequila Butcher, 590 West 79th Street in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the public are welcome. 3 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item 2026 Utility Fund Budgets, 2026 Utility Rates, and 2026-2030 Utility Fund CIP File No.Item No: A.1 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Financial Sustainability SUMMARY Staff will review the 2026 Water, Sewer, and Storm Water Fund budgets, proposed utility fund rates for 2026, and the 2026-2030 Utility Fund Capital Improvement Plan. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION 4 ATTACHMENTS 5 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item Pleasant View Road Improvement Project File No.ENG 26-03 Item No: A.2 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION N/A - Discussion only Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY Staff will give an update on the status of the Pleasant View Road Improvement Project BACKGROUND Pleasant View Road is currently being shown in our 5-yr CIP as a multi-year project starting in 2027. The exact scope of the rehabilitation is not currently identified, understanding that the corridor offers challenges as far as street width, available right of way, steep slopes, and proximity of natural assets such as trees and Lotus Lake. There are two main goals at this time: Pavement rehabilitation Safety improvements DISCUSSION 6 There is a public open house scheduled for Tuesday, November 18th at City Hall to explore a host of topics with the public, and to get a sense of how big of a project should be planned. BUDGET There is currently no budget defined for the project due to the limited definition of scope. RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS 7 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item Sign Code Discussion File No.Item No: A.3 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Eric Maass, Community Development Director Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION No formal action; general discussion only. Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY The 2025 Community Development annual work plan included a review and update of the sign code. Attached to this case is a memo that staff has prepared outlining the specific areas of the sign ordinance that staff has flagged as needing to be updated. Staff is seeking feedback from the City Council on these areas, as well as any other areas of the sign code that the City Council would like to see reviewed. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET This effort is being conducted with regular staff duties, with assistance from the city attorney's office. 8 RECOMMENDATION No formal recommendation; general discussion only. ATTACHMENTS Sign Ordinance Memo 9 To: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Prepared By: Community Development Department Date: October 7, 2025 Subject: Sign Code Amendments The 2025 Community Development Department's work plan includes review and potential updates to the city’s sign ordinance. BACKGROUND The current sign ordinance can be found in Article 20-XXVI of the zoning code. The sign regulations were written in 1995, amended multiple times since, most recently in 2022. TEXT AMENDMENT SUMMARY Definitions Staff is proposing changes to the applicable sign code deflnitions to refiect current sign design, reorganizing regulations to improve clarity and user experience, and ensuring conformance with federal law. Staff proposed revisions to the deflnitions for the following: 1. Clarifying language for readability and application. 2. Removing regulations within deflnitions and properly relocating them into applicable sign code ordinances. 3. Removing unlawful regulation language or unlawful deflnitions. Amending for Conformance with Law The majority of the changes proposed by staff aim to conform with federal law, speciflcally to ensure that no First Amendment violations occur. Federal case law from the lawsuit Reed versus Town of Gilbert sets guidance for how a city may regulate signs. Courts presume that sign ordinances that restrict speech, explicitly or implicitly, are 10 unconstitutional. Staff must review the city sign code to ensure ordinance language does not refer to the content of the sign and subsequently regulate differently based on said content. Examples of potential flrst amendment violations 1. Deflnitions that categorize signage based on content. 2. Noncommercial signage being regulated speciflcally as to whether it is for a campaign. 3. Community based signage limiting the content that applies for this particular signage. 4. Garage sale signage regulates based on the content of the signage rather than temporary residential nature. 5. Employment opportunity signage advertising speciflcally for job recruitment is regulated separately. 6. Regulating corporate fiags. Downtown Design Guidelines The city recently adopted Downtown Design Guidelines which includes recommendations for signage regulations. The guidelines call for the use of projecting signs within the downtown area but currently are prohibited by the city’s sign code. Projecting signs were included in the Downtown Design Guidelines as they are a feature typically found in a downtown commercial area as they offer visual intrigue in addition to identiflcation value. Staff proposes the following draft guidelines for projecting signs. 1. Must provide a clearance of 8’ from the adjacent sidewalk or flnished surface. 2. Each building tenant with an individual exterior entrance, may have 1 projecting sign in addition to a traditional wall sign. 3. Projecting signs located on the flrst fioor shall not exceed 6 square feet. 4. Projecting signs located above the flrst fioor shall not exceed three (3) feet in height per building story for the building face in which the projecting sign is located. 5. Projecting signs are limited to a projection distance of not more than four (4) feet. This is measured from edge of building face to outer edge of the projecting sign furthest from the building face. Temporary Signs Staff recommends prohibiting temporary feather fiag signs within the City of Chanhassen. 11 Currently city code requires temporary sign permits for banners, portable signs, infiatable advertising devices, large fiags, and searchlights. City Staff would like City Council’s opinion on if these permits should be continued, or if we should allow temporary signs without permits with the same regulations In 2025 the city received 8 permits, 2024 had 10 permits, and 2023 had 10 permits. Approximately 4 of those permits every year are for one business utilizing the same banner on multiple occasions throughout the year, this is equal to 42% of all the permits from 2023 to 2025. Staff additionally found a pattern of the same parcel with multiple business comprising of another 14% of all the temporary sign permits from 2023 to 2025. Based on this information staff is posing the question of if this permit should continue to be required, or if we should allow this signage without a permit still subject to the same regulations. Improve Tangible Application Through the implementation of the city code in sign permit reviews, there are areas of needed clariflcation or simpliflcation. These changes will improve the customer experience, reduce permit review time, and improve consistency in the application of the city code. Examples of recommended improvements include the following: 1. Window signage, current code is not easily interpreted and has multiple layers of regulation rather than a straightforward percentage of window allowed to be covered in signage. PROCESS AND TIMELINE Staff anticipates completing the sign ordinance amendment process prior to the end of the year. FEEDBACK REQUESTED Staff is seeking the City Council’s feedback regarding the proposed amendments, permitting requirement for temporary signage, and if there are any additional items City Council would like staff to review as part of this ordinance review. 12 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item Future Work Session Schedule File No.Item No: A.4 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY The City Council is tentatively scheduled to hold the following work sessions: November 24, 2025 Final Review of Proposed 2025 Levy, Budgets, and CIP for all funds 2050 Comp Plan process overview Lake Ann Park Preserve update December 15, 2025 City Council Roundtable BACKGROUND Staff or the City Council may suggest topics for work sessions. Dates are tentative until the meeting agenda is published. Work sessions are typically held at 5:30 p.m. in conjunction with the regular City Council meeting, but may be scheduled for other times as needed. 13 DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 14 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item Approve City Council Meeting Minutes dated October 27, 2025 File No.Item No: D.1 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Jenny Potter, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the City Council Meeting minutes dated October 27, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Chanhassen City Council approve the City Council Meeting minutes dated October 27, 2025. 15 ATTACHMENTS City Council Meeting minutes dated October 27, 2025 16 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 27, 2025 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilmember McDonald, Councilmember Schubert, Councilmember von Oven, and Councilmember Kimber. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Eric Maass, Community Development Director; Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director; and Jenny Potter, City Clerk. PUBLIC PRESENT: None. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: 1. Invitation to City Hall Open House on November 1 2. Old National Bank Recognition from the City of Chanhassen Mayor Ryan recognized Old National Bank for their support during the City Hall construction. Councilmember McDonald stated that Old National Bank served as a valuable partner to help build the City Hall. 3. Southern Valley Alliance: Domestic Violence Awareness Month A representative from Southern Valley Alliance shared updated information related to Southern Valley Alliance and Domestic Violence Awareness Month. Councilmember McDonald stated that Southern Valley Alliance was a great organization and provided a great service while people are working through domestic issues. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilmember McDonald moved, Councilmember von Oven seconded that the City Council approve the following consent agenda items 1 through 11 pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated October 13, 2025 2. Approve City Council Work Session Minutes dated October 13, 2025 3. Approve Special City Council Meeting Minutes dated October 20, 2025 17 City Council Minutes – October 27, 2025 2 4. Receive Environmental Commission Minutes dated September 10, 2025 5. Receive Economic Development Commission Minutes 6. Approve Claims Paid dated October 27, 2025 7. Award 2026-2028 4th of July Fireworks Contract 8. Approve an Encroachment Agreement between the City of Chanhassen and the property owner at 824 Lone Eagle Drive 9. Approve a Site Plan Agreement for Eden Springs Assisted Living and Memory Care located at 1620 Arboretum Boulevard 10. Resolution 2025-71: Call for Public Hearing to Order the Great Plains Boulevard/Lake Drive East Improvement Project 11. Resolution 2025-72: Approve Vacant Land Purchase from Carver County All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. None. FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATES. None. PUBLIC HEARINGS. 1. Resolution 2025-73: Certification of Delinquent Utility Accounts and Code Enforcement Charges to the County Auditor Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director, reviewed the process for delinquent utility accounts. Mayor Ryan opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. Mayor Ryan closed the public hearing. Councilmember Schubert moved, Councilmember Kimber seconded that the Chanhassen City Council adopt a resolution certifying delinquent utility accounts and code enforcement charges to the County Auditor. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. 2. Resolution 2025-74: Accept Feasibility Study, Conduct Public Improvement Hearing, and Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Market Boulevard Improvement Project Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, reviewed the project scope for the Market Boulevard Improvement Project. He summarized the regional downtown water reuse system, which supports permitting of multiple City projects. He provided an overview of the public engagement efforts 18 City Council Minutes – October 27, 2025 3 for the project and noted that they received one comment about the entry monument sign. He explained the project funding summary and stated that the project was 43 percent City-funded and 57 percent funded by outside sources. He reviewed the preliminary assessment map for the project and stated that the assessment amounts were determined based on a front footage methodology. He summarized the schedule and next steps for the project. Mayor Ryan opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. Mayor Ryan closed the public hearing. Councilmember McDonald moved, Councilmember von Oven seconded that the Chanhassen City Council adopt a Resolution Accepting the feasibility study, ordering the improvements, and authorizing preparation of plans and specifications for the Market Boulevard Reconstruction Project. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. GENERAL BUSINESS. 1. Adopt Ordinance 752: Amending Chapter 20 Zoning Regulations for Accessory Structures Eric Maass, Community Development Director, reviewed the two requests for citizen action forms that requested the city consider changes to the accessory structures ordinance. He summarized three alternatives for an agricultural exemption for accessory structures. Councilmember Kimber asked if there was part of the ordinance that restricts the accessory structure to having less square footage than the primary structure. Mr. Maass answered that the current ordinance alternatives did not place a cap on total square footage for an accessory structure based on the principle structure. He stated that it was based on the zoning designation or the lot area, but they could add a reference. He commented that they would want to note if it included the habitable place and the garage space. Councilmember Kimber said he did not want to define a cap but stated that the accessory structure could not be larger than the primary structure. Mr. Maass answered that it could be added, but he did not think an accessory structure would be larger than a primary structure. Councilmember Kimber suggested that they add a cap. Mayor Ryan asked if this was from when they were redoing the ordinance about adding onto an existing structure, or if this was separate. Councilmember Kimber said that he thought this was separate, as there are larger lots in town with smaller homes. He asked if they would want to restrict the size of an accessory structure to be smaller than the primary structure. Councilmember von Oven said they had a lengthy discussion about additions to buildings, but did not remember a conversation about an accessory structure. 19 City Council Minutes – October 27, 2025 4 Councilmember McDonald stated he did not want to limit the accessory structure size but wanted it to be on a case-by-case basis. He stated that there were not many larger lots, so he did not think it would be an issue. Councilmember Kimber expressed an interest in Alternative A, as he thought it was clearer. Councilmember Kimber moved, Councilmember Schubert seconded that the Chanhassen City Council approves amending Chapter 20 Zoning Regulations for Accessory Structures as outlined by Alternate A Ordinance. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. None. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. 1. 7331 Hazeltine Blvd Short Term Rental License Councilmember Schubert moved, Councilmember McDonald seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 7:44 p.m. Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen City Manager Prepared by Jenny Potter City Clerk 20 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item Approve City Council Work Session Minutes dated October 27, 2025. File No.Item No: D.2 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Jenny Potter, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the City Council Work Session Minutes dated October 27, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Chanhassen City Council approve the City Council Work Session minutes dated October 27, 2025. 21 ATTACHMENTS City Council Work Session minutes dated October 27, 2025 22 1 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES October 27, 2025 Mayor Ryan called the work session to order at 5:30 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilmember McDonald, Councilmember von Oven, Councilmember Kimber, Councilmember Schubert COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Eric Maas, Planning Director; Patrick Gavin, Communications Manager; Jenny Potter, City Clerk; Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director PUBLIC PRESENT: Presentation of Capital Fund Budgets and 2026–2030 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director, presented details on vehicle and equipment replacements, facility maintenance, transportation infrastructure, pavement management and park improvements. This included a projected $1.4 million fund balance for the Vehicle and Equipment Fund in 2026, a $4.8 million budget for annual street reconstruction, and plans for a $350,000 levy by 2030 to support future park renovations. Discussion also covered upcoming playground replacements at Lake Ann Park and Bandimere Community Park, completing the Lake Ann Park Preserve project and continued reliance on grants and park dedication fees for park development. Discussion centered on how best to balance ongoing neighborhood park updates with upcoming major playground projects at Lake Ann and Bandimere Parks. Highway 7 and Highway 41 Update Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer, discussed the Highway 5 reconstruction project beginning in 2026, a planned restriping effort by MnDOT to add dedicated turn lanes at Longacres and Lake Lucy intersections, and the temporary traffic signal at MMSW. Mr. Howley also outlined future roundabout projects near the middle school (programmed for 2028) and at Lake Lucy, which could be constructed together if funding aligns. On Highway 7, the update clarified the roles of three parallel efforts, a safety coalition, a new transportation management organization, and MnDOT’s corridor study. All focused on improving safety and traffic flow through coordinated planning and the upcoming 2029 MnDOT rehabilitation project. Communications for the Highway 5 project is expected to begin once bids are awarded later this fall 23 City Council Work Session Minutes – October 27, 2025 2 Mayor Ryan adjourned the work session at 6:50 P.M. Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen City Manager Prepared by Jenny Potter City Clerk 24 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item Receive Park and Recreation Commission Minutes dated August 26, 2025 File No.Item No: D.3 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Kate Vogt, Admin Support Specialist Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council receives the Park and Recreation Commission minutes dated August 26, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 25 August 26, 2025 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes 26 CHANHASSEN PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 26, 2025 Chair Leisen called the meeting to order at 6:08 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Rob Swanson; Kristin Fulkerson; Michael Leisen; Sean Morgan; Emily Nagel; Kurt Scheppmann; Nora Nashawaty; and Clara Christenson, youth. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Jerry Ruegemer, Park and Recreation Director; and Priya Wall, Recreation Manager. PUBLIC PRESENT: None. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Commissioner Swanson moved, Commissioner Fulkerson seconded to approve the agenda as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 8 to 0. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: None. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. Approve Park & Recreation Minutes dated July 22, 2025 Commissioner Fulkerson moved, Commissioner Nashawaty seconded to approve the minutes of the Park and Recreation Commission meeting dated July 22, 2025 as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 8 to 0. GENERAL BUSINESS: 1. Park Renovation Fund & Chanhassen Estates Mini Park Discussion Jerry Ruegemer, Park and Recreation Director, summarized the different park facilities and staff throughout Chanhassen. He reviewed the background of the Park Renovation Fund, which is supported by a dedicated property tax levy and is utilized to replace or repair major park equipment and infrastructure. He explained that previously, the city used surplus funds at the end of the year for park renovation. 27 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – August 26, 2025 2 Chair Leisen asked if there was a budget surplus, if it could still be used for park renovation, or if the $100,000 is the cap of the funds. Mr. Ruegemer responded that it would be a possibility, but the city also needs to save for long-term purchases, such as a firetruck. Commissioner Fulkerson asked if the levy would continue beyond 2029. Mr. Ruegemer answered that it would likely continue in the future, but he could not guarantee it. Commissioner Swanson asked about the price increase between 2028 and 2029. Mr. Ruegemer answered that it was a stepped or tiered percentage, so that the rate would be higher in 2029. Commissioner Scheppmann asked if the $100,000 and subsequent years were allocated solely for park renovation, excluding maintenance and capital expenditures. Mr. Ruegemer confirmed this information. Commissioner Scheppmann asked if the $180,000 had historically been allocated solely for park renovation. Mr. Ruegemer answered that the $180,000 was for park renovation. Mr. Ruegemer reviewed previous park improvements funded by the budget surplus. Commissioner Morgan asked if the funds were set in stone since they were voted on by the City Council. Mr. Ruegemer answered that the numbers were projected, but they could change either way. He said that there was an aging park system that needed attention. He discussed utilizing the operating budget for smaller projects. Commissioner Nashawaty asked if they discussed the parks at the truth and taxation meeting. Mr. Ruegemer said that they had postponed different playground replacements because of other priorities. He said that there were a number of playgrounds that would need to be replaced over the next four to five years. Mr. Ruegemer summarized the improvements planned for the Carver Beach Playground. Chair Lesisen asked if there was a fence around the baseball diamond. Mr. Ruegemer answered that there was not, but they do not schedule the baseball field. Youth Commissioner Christenson asked about parking. Mr. Ruegemer answered that there was minimal parking at the location. Mr. Ruegemer discussed the pickleball courts that had cracks and the alternative solution to repair the courts. 28 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – August 26, 2025 3 Commissioner Nashawaty asked about the plan to maintain the pickleball courts. Mr. Ruegemer answered that the city plans to keep the outdoor facilities under city ownership, so they plan to maintain them. Mr. Ruegemer reviewed the planned expenses for the park improvements and noted that they were just under the budget threshold. He discussed the Chanhassen Estates Mini Park to better understand who utilized the park. He commented that he wanted the Park and Recreation Commission to look at the existing playground and park to get a better picture of different considerations. Chair Leisen thanked him for the well-documented information. He would be curious about low- cost alternatives for this park. Commissioner Fulkerson asked if there would be interest in having a community garden there. Commissioner Morgan asked what the cost would be to put in a modest parking lot. Mr. Ruegemer responded that it would be more expensive than you would think. Commissioner Nashawaty asked about easements near the properties to build a sidewalk and then utilize the street parking. Chair Leisen said that most neighborhood parks had small parking lots. Mr. Ruegemer answered that they would not like to seek a model that utilized street parking. Commissioner Swanson asked if there was an ideal proximity between parks. Mr. Ruegemer answered about a half-mile. Commissioner Nagel said if they decommission Chanhassen Estates Mini Park, they should invest in Rice Marsh Park. Commissioner Swanson said he had friends in that neighborhood who did not go to Chanhassen Estates. Youth Commissioner Christenson said that the park was only appealing to smaller children. Commissioner Nagel emphasized the importance of pollinator gardens. She asked about the cost to remove the existing infrastructure. Mr. Ruegemer answered that they would remove the playground in-house. Commissioner Fulkerson asked if it would be possible to get a dedicated crosswalk. Mr. Ruegemer answered that it would be a heavy lift with the Engineering Department because they do not like mid-block crosswalks. 29 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – August 26, 2025 4 Commissioner Nashawaty asked about the ash trees. Mr. Ruegemer answered that it could certainly be a part of the discussion if they are diagnosed as diseased trees. 2. Civic Campus Programming Discussion Priya Wall, Recreation Manager, reviewed phase two of the Civic Campus Project scheduled for completion during the summer of 2026. Chair Leisen asked if there would still be a skating rink. Mr. Ruegemer confirmed this information, but there would not be formalized hockey rinks. Ms. Wall reviewed the previous request to focus on three strategic objectives. She noted that the infrastructure policies were well-set, but they could focus on programming to make downtown a magnet for community building. She stated that there was not a set budget for programming in this space, but they could bring the desires into the budget discussion for 2026. Chair Leisen noted that there were large events on the calendar that they would need to work around. He asked for a refresher on these events. Ms. Wall reviewed the different community events from January to December. She discussed additional programming, such as fitness activities and game groups. Ms. Wall said that they were larger style events, but not as many smaller events. Commissioner Morgan expressed thanks for the approach to brainstorming. He asked if budgets were flat, if there were events that would be better. Mr. Ruegemer answered that they did not have a lot of money wrapped up in the programming. He thought a new space might attract title sponsorships for events. He noted that they wanted to engage their business community and get them involved to keep their costs lower. Commissioner Nashawaty asked when they were expecting to have the outdoor space done. Mr. Ruegemer answered that the goal was to have the space done by July 1st, but that is not a guarantee, so they might need to have an alternative plan for July 4th. Chair Leisen noted that the movie in the park attracted teenagers, so he asked if a regular movie night would be beneficial. Commissioner Fulkerson discussed the Café that occurs at the high school. She suggested a similar activity. Ms. Wall said that Supernova, a band made up of Chanhassen high schoolers, was the best- attended event. 30 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – August 26, 2025 5 Commissioner Nashawaty asked if one of the August Music Nights could be part of the kick-off week for the new space. Ms. Wall answered that they hoped to do a kick-off event, and the concert series would be at Lake Ann Park until that point. Commissioner Swanson discussed the potential of doing a community day similar to the event at the Chanhassen Recreation Center. Youth Commissioner Christenson asked if they could do something with National Night Out, such as providing free ice cream. Commissioner Nashawaty asked about using National Night Out to advertise the kick-off week. Commissioner Morgan said he saw poetry readings at the farmers' market. Commissioner Swanson asked about partnering with the Renaissance fest. Ms. Wall answered that they reached out in the past about booth space, so they might be interested. Commissioner Fulkerson asked about partnering with Carlson’s Llamas. Commissioner Nashwaty asked about a skating event or pickleball. Youth Commissioner Christenson asked about collaborating with the library for an event as well. Commissioner Nagel asked if there was an opportunity to do community art at the space. Ms. Wall answered that they could explore a small version of community art. Youth Commissioner Christenson said that graduating seniors can get a tile and paint on it, and each senior class puts their tiles together. She asked if they could do something similar. Commissioner Nashawaty asked if they could hang it in the building, or if they could have a brick that would be donated to help with the costs of items. Mr. Ruegemer said that they had bricks near the train depot, but it was not an active program. Commissioner Nashawaty suggested a thumbprint as a leaf on a tree to incorporate a lot of residents without a lot of footprint. Commissioner Morgan asked if there were pop-up fitness events that could generate excitement and be a continuous series. Ms. Wall said that Lifetime partners with Crispin’ Green. She said Fit for Life might want to do an event. Commissioner Nashawaty said there was a yoga studio called One Life Yoga that might be interested in the event. 31 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – August 26, 2025 6 Chair Leisen suggested smaller events throughout the summer. Ms. Wall summarized the discussion about the potential for a kick-off week, including a community art project, a summer movie night, and partnerships with other organizations to provide smaller events throughout the week. Commissioner Nashawaty suggested that they could create a subcommittee to plan events. REPORTS: Mr. Ruegemer provided an update about the Chanhassen Bluffs Recreation Center. He said they were reducing the square footage and changing the exterior of the building and the roof design to help reduce the costs. He said that they would be purchasing an extra three acres for future considerations. He discussed that the goal was to have it open for Chanhassen High School Graduation in Spring 2028. He stated that they were looking at ways to better orient the building to help reduce the grading costs. Commissioner Fulkerson advocated for a skate school. Commissioner Morgan said that the restaurant space has evolved. Mr. Ruegemer said that the restaurant spaces struggle. He said a catering kitchen would be appealing to host events, so they did not feel like it was negative to lose the restaurant component. Commissioner Nashawaty said she thought the event space would be popular. Mr. Ruegemer provided an update on Lake Ann Park Preserve. He said he submitted the report with the recommendations to the State Historic Preservation Office, and they have a 30-day review. He said that the plan set was at 80 to 90 percent, so they did not want to redesign, and they wanted to minimize impact. He discussed various challenges related to the project. COMMISSION MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS: None. COMMISSION MEMBER PRESENTATIONS: None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS: None. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Swanson moved, Commissioner Fulkerson seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 8 to 0. The Park and Recreation Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:37 p.m. Submitted by Jerry Ruegemer Park and Recreation Director 32 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item Receive Commission on Aging Minutes dated August 15, 2025 File No.Item No: D.4 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Kate Vogt, Admin Support Specialist Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council receives the Commission on Aging Minutes dated August 15, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS August 15, 2025 Commission on Aging Minutes 33 Chanhassen Commission on Aging, August 15, 2025 The meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. by Commissioner Camarata. MEMBERS PRESENT: Jim Camarata, Gwen Block, Jane Bender, Janet Dean, Phyllis Mobley, Barbara Solum, Bill Monn MEMBERS ABSENT: Beth Mason GUESTS PRESENT: Linnea Fonnest, Chanhassen Library. Kara Cassidy, Carver County Health and Human Services, Office of Aging; Linda Kerber, City of Carver resident. CALL TO ORDER: Jim Camarata, Chair APPROVAL OF AGENDA: The agenda was reviewed as submitted. Commissioner Block made a motion to approve the agenda. Commissioner Mobley seconded. All members voted in favor; the motion was carried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: June 20, 2025, minutes were reviewed. Commissioner Mobley made a motion to approve the minutes. Commissioner Solum seconded. All members voted in favor; the motion was carried. GENERAL BUSINESS: 4th of July Recap 4th of July Bingo was a success! Over 600 people participated in the free Bingo event sponsored by the Commission and hosted by hosted by KDWB's Dave Ryan. Thirty prize packages were created from the generous gift cards and givc-aways provided by local businesses and organizations. This year’s fundraising efforts went to Senior Community Services Tech Assistance Program and raised $1000 in donations. Fall 55+ Health and Wellness Expo the Fall 55+ Health and Wellness Expo will be held Wednesday, October 8th at the Chanhassen Recreation Center. This event highlights local nonprofit programs and organizations and connects seniors with important resources. Commissioner Check-In on Areas of Interest/Focus Projects –Commissioner Bender is interested in working on marketing our resources for seniors better to the community, Patrick Gavin will attend a meeting in September to discuss how City staff can help in that area. Commissioner Mobley is interested in mental health and wellness; she will work with Mary on future programs to offer on this topic. Commissioner Dean is interested in working with Honoring Choices, related to health care directives and how to support seniors in creating them. Commissioner Monn is interested better educating and connecting people to transportation options in our community. Commissioners Block and Solum continue to assist as needed with Senior Center programs and events. 34 Commission Sub-Committee Reports Commissioners Camarata and Mason continue to work on resource guides and communications with local newspapers and magazines, with Camarata posting regular articles related to housing issues. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: Chanhassen Senior Center Upcoming Programs Mary shared with the commission that the Fall Connection is now out, it has all the upcoming programing that is being offered. She touched on some of that programming, inviting the commissioners to join in. The move in date for the new Senior Center is to be determined but Mary is prepared to stay at the Recreation Center through October, or until the new space is available. Kara Cassidy, Carver County Health and Human Services, Office of Aging Commissioner Camarata presented on behalf of Kara Cassidy. The annual meeting of Carver County Commission on Aging will be held on September 5th, from 10 am until 1 pm at the Arboretum. Chanhassen Library Linnea Fonnest presented on upcoming programming happening at the Chanhassen Library this fall. DISCUSSION Guest Linda Kerber shared that she is gathering information on the possibility of creating a Commission on Aging in the City of Carver. Commissioners shared resource and contact information with her for moving forward. Linnea Fonnest discussed the issue of food insecurities in the senior population. Carver County is working on creating Resource Navigators to help people find resource information. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Mobley made a motion to approve adjournment. Commissioner Dean seconded. All members voted in favor; the motion was carried. Meeting adjourned at 11:19 am. Submitted by Mary Blazanin, Senior Center Coordinator 35 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item Receive Commission on Aging Minutes dated September 19, 2025 File No.Item No: D.5 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Kate Vogt, Admin Support Specialist Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council receives the Commission on Aging Minutes dated September 19, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 36 September 19, 2025 Commission on Aging Minutes 37 Chanhassen Commission on Aging, September 19, 2025 The meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. by Commissioner Camarata. MEMBERS’ PRESENT: Jim Camarata, Gwen Block, Jane Bender, Phyllis Mobley, Barbara Solum, Bill Monn, Beth Mason MEMBERS ABSENT: Janet Dean, GUESTS PRESENT: Patrick Gavin, Chanhassen Communications Manager. Linnea Fonnest, Chanhassen Library. Kara Cassidy, Carver County Health and Human Services, Office of Aging. CALL TO ORDER: Jim Camarata, Chair APPROVAL OF AGENDA: The agenda was reviewed, one correction was made related to guest attendance. Commissioner Mobley made a motion to approve the agenda. Commissioner Mason seconded. All members voted in favor; the motion was carried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 15, 2025, minutes were reviewed. It was noted that Senior Community Service staff were unable to attend. Commissioner Block made a motion to approve the minutes. Commissioner Mobley seconded. All members voted in favor; the motion was carried. GENERAL BUSINESS: Commissioner Check-In on Areas of Interest/Focus Projects. Commissioner Bender has been working with Patrick Gavin to create a way to push communication on senior programming, working on an inclusive way to share the resources with all seniors, but possibly focusing on 40– 50-year-olds with parents in the community. Patrick shared the current avenues being used by the City of Chanhassen and was able to share a few suggestions for starting points in reaching that age group. Patrick will assist in developing a plan with Mary and Commissioner Bender. Commissioner Mobley reported that her initiative to promote wellness programming will begin in partnership with the Senior Center after the first of the year, 2026. She is reaching out to resources to provide presentations and trainings on various issues. Commissioner Monn discussed his initiative to gather information on the City’s transportation options for seniors. He will be meeting with one of our council members as well as SW Transit staff to learn more and will share that information with the Commissioners. Commissioner Camarata further discussed the idea of putting out a survey to seniors in Chanhassen. Fall 55+ Health and Wellness. The Fall 55+ Health and Wellness Expo will be held on Wednesday, October 8th, from 9:00 a.m. until 12:00 p.m. at the Chanhassen Recreation Center. 38 This event highlights local nonprofit programs and organizations and connects seniors with important resources. Commissioners volunteered their time to attend and assist that day. Mayor’s Luncheon. Mary shared details on the Mayor’s Luncheon happening on Tuesday, October 7, 2025, starting at 11:00 a.m. and ending at 1:00 p.m. Registration is required. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: Kara Cassidy, Carver County Health and Human Services, Office of Aging. Kara thanked the commission for attending her County wide Senior Commssion event at the Arboretum and shared that it went well. She also brought along some information on vaccinations, emergency preparedness initiatives, and shared State and County resource ideas with the commissioners. Chanhassen Senior Center Upcoming Programs. Mary shared with the commission some of the upcoming Senior Center programs. There is a lot on the agenda for this fall season, mostly trips as we transition to the new building, and she sees that it is reaching a very large range of age groups. Chanhassen Library. Linnea Fonnest summarized fall programming for the Chanhassen Library. More information on this can be found in the library brochure. DISCUSSION ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Mobley made a motion to approve adjournment. Commissioner Solum seconded. All members voted in favor; the motion was carried. Meeting adjourned at 11:33 am. Submitted by Mary Blazanin, Senior Center Coordinator 39 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item Approve Claims Paid dated November 10, 2025 File No.Item No: D.6 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Danielle Washburn, Assistant Finance Director Reviewed By Kelly Grinnell SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council Approves Claims Paid dated November 10, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Financial Sustainability SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION The following claims are submitted for review and approval on November 10, 2025: Total Claims $4,227,277.53 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION 40 ATTACHMENTS Payment Summary Payment Detail 41 Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount A Better Society 10/22/2025 0.00 750.00 ABM Equipment, LLC 10/22/2025 0.00 2,472.62 Across The Street Productions 10/22/2025 0.00 4,709.25 Ador LLC 10/22/2025 0.00 5,100.00 ALBERT WONG 10/22/2025 0.00 30.70 Alexis Siegel-Carlson 10/22/2025 0.00 8,910.00 ALL AMERICAN TITLE 10/22/2025 0.00 107.18 ALL AMERICAN TITLE 10/22/2025 0.00 128.96 American Pressure Inc 10/22/2025 0.00 254.39 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 10/22/2025 0.00 84.54 AMY & ADAM WAKEFIELD 10/22/2025 0.00 112.52 ANA & ANTHONY TROWBRIDGE 10/22/2025 0.00 33.12 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 10/22/2025 0.00 80.98 Badger State Inspection LLC 10/22/2025 0.00 14,500.00 BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 10/22/2025 0.00 313.75 BOLTON & MENK INC 10/22/2025 0.00 299,696.26 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 10/22/2025 0.00 87,525.54 BROADCAST MUSIC INC 10/22/2025 0.00 428.64 BURNET TITLE 10/22/2025 0.00 52.45 BURNET TITLE 10/22/2025 0.00 124.41 BURNET TITLE 10/22/2025 0.00 54.51 BURNET TITLE 10/22/2025 0.00 65.82 BURNET TITLE 10/22/2025 0.00 23.81 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 10/22/2025 0.00 20,408.23 Capital Siding Windows & Roofing 10/22/2025 0.00 120.00 CDW GOVERNMENT LLC 10/22/2025 0.00 11,464.40 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 10/22/2025 0.00 1,051.66 CenturyLink 10/22/2025 0.00 128.96 Chan Three Development Inc 10/22/2025 0.00 4,509.89 City of Bloomington 10/22/2025 0.00 464.00 CONRAD A. WINKEL 10/22/2025 0.00 71.99 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC. 10/22/2025 0.00 1,737.72 DANIEL S. SHREVE 10/22/2025 0.00 110.64 Dingman Custom Homes 10/22/2025 0.00 2,920.00 EDINA REALTY TITLE 10/22/2025 0.00 62.52 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 10/22/2025 0.00 1,244.00 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE 10/22/2025 0.00 212.10 GRETCHEN & JOSEPH MEIER 10/22/2025 0.00 47.40 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 10/22/2025 0.00 4,044.52 HealthPartners, Inc. 10/22/2025 0.00 88,446.97 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 10/22/2025 0.00 4,600.00 Houston Engineering Inc 10/22/2025 0.00 7,404.93 I & S Group, Inc 10/22/2025 0.00 38,122.12 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 10/22/2025 0.00 113.87 JACK BLY 10/22/2025 0.00 46.23 Page 1 of 3 42 Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount JASON & ELIZABETH HERNANDEZ 10/22/2025 0.00 101.48 JASON & LI LEPAGE 10/22/2025 0.00 75.39 Juli Al-Hilwani 10/22/2025 0.00 412.50 KARLEY GIL VILLEGAS & TOMI SAWWER 10/22/2025 0.00 24.30 KELLY & ALEXANDER FETSCH 10/22/2025 0.00 1,496.20 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 10/22/2025 0.00 46.00 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 10/22/2025 0.00 16,084.20 KonectaUSA LLC 10/22/2025 0.00 91,475.20 Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P 10/22/2025 0.00 3,333.33 Macqueen Emergency Group 10/22/2025 0.00 1,917.28 Marco Inc 10/22/2025 0.00 735.00 Marcy Bean 10/22/2025 0.00 1,000.00 MATTHEW SPILANE 10/22/2025 0.00 20.09 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 10/22/2025 0.00 621.78 Mesenbrink Construction and Engineering Inc 10/22/2025 0.00 1,957.28 Minnesota Valley Landscape Inc 10/22/2025 0.00 660.20 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 10/22/2025 0.00 382.42 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 10/22/2025 0.00 139.43 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 10/22/2025 0.00 36.99 Noah Benscher 10/22/2025 0.00 5,300.00 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 10/22/2025 0.00 625,462.95 OJARS PAPEDIS; TRUSTEE OF THE OJARS 10/22/2025 0.00 82.85 Pinnacle Pest Control 10/22/2025 0.00 730.00 PRESTIGE POOLS 10/22/2025 0.00 1,000.00 Pro-Tree Outdoor Services 10/22/2025 0.00 1,320.00 Rahamthunnisa Shaik 10/22/2025 0.00 165.00 Reem Danial 10/22/2025 0.00 302.40 RESULTS TITLE 10/22/2025 0.00 19.87 ROADKILL ANIMAL CONTROL 10/22/2025 0.00 129.00 SAM CHARCHIAN 10/22/2025 0.00 130.41 Silva Screenprinting & Dist, LLC 10/22/2025 0.00 98.11 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 10/22/2025 0.00 254.56 Stericycle, Inc 10/22/2025 0.00 229.00 STEWART TITLE COMPANY 10/22/2025 0.00 68.56 STONE ARCH TITLE LLC 10/22/2025 0.00 48.44 StreetLight Data, Inc 10/22/2025 0.00 6,751.00 THE TITLE GROUP INC 10/22/2025 0.00 101.84 TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 10/22/2025 0.00 28.83 TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 10/22/2025 0.00 77.66 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 10/22/2025 0.00 26.36 TY & CLAIRE MCDEVITT 10/22/2025 0.00 73.89 TYLER PAULSON 10/22/2025 0.00 77.85 VALLEY-RICH CO INC 10/22/2025 0.00 1,960.00 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 10/22/2025 0.00 19.69 WEST TITLE LLC 10/22/2025 0.00 8.38 XCEL ENERGY INC 10/22/2025 0.00 15,090.62 Across The Street Productions 10/29/2025 0.00 125.00 Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 10/29/2025 0.00 1,571.25 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 10/29/2025 0.00 942.22 Badger State Inspection LLC 10/29/2025 0.00 1,702.50 Bildeaux Services 10/29/2025 0.00 2,100.00 Bohlmann, Inc. 10/29/2025 0.00 123.50 BROADWAY AWARDS 10/29/2025 0.00 33.17 Page 2 of 3 43 Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Cathy Larson 10/29/2025 0.00 100.00 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 10/29/2025 0.00 22,872.45 CENTURYLINK 10/29/2025 0.00 592.99 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 10/29/2025 0.00 91.26 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC. 10/29/2025 0.00 232.84 Daniel Rademacher 10/29/2025 0.00 190.00 DENALI CUSTOM HOMES INC 10/29/2025 0.00 750.00 Ditch Witch of Minnesota & Iowa 10/29/2025 0.00 95.84 Dorsey and Whitney, LLP 10/29/2025 0.00 12,727.00 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 10/29/2025 0.00 604.35 Edina Heating & Cooling Inc 10/29/2025 0.00 8,044.00 Environmental Plant Services, Inc 10/29/2025 0.00 9,500.00 Eric Johnson 10/29/2025 0.00 50.00 Federal Signal Corporation 10/29/2025 0.00 7,345.00 Field Environmental Consulting Inc 10/29/2025 0.00 500.00 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 10/29/2025 0.00 11,597.91 Houston Engineering Inc 10/29/2025 0.00 9,571.25 Infosend, Inc 10/29/2025 0.00 4,001.89 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 10/29/2025 0.00 97.84 JI Tile LLC 10/29/2025 0.00 500.00 Karen Sazdoff 10/29/2025 0.00 50.00 Lawson Products, Inc. 10/29/2025 0.00 786.96 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 10/29/2025 0.00 50.00 Mark Hornung 10/29/2025 0.00 100.00 Metro Garage Door Company 10/29/2025 0.00 3,637.97 Michael Ewasiuk 10/29/2025 0.00 100.00 Michael LoScalzo 10/29/2025 0.00 50.00 Mike Hilgers 10/29/2025 0.00 1,009.00 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 10/29/2025 0.00 1,302.27 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 10/29/2025 0.00 195.23 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 10/29/2025 0.00 223.68 Nathan Burkett 10/29/2025 0.00 100.00 North American Safety, Inc. 10/29/2025 0.00 593.88 Panera LLC 10/29/2025 0.00 7,100.00 Patrick Gavin 10/29/2025 0.00 837.61 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 10/29/2025 0.00 684.20 Rachel Arsenault 10/29/2025 0.00 31.64 Ross Reeves 10/29/2025 0.00 100.00 Ryan Contracting Company 10/29/2025 0.00 1,661,667.79 SEH 10/29/2025 0.00 1,744.57 SM HENTGES & SONS 10/29/2025 0.00 928,827.68 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 10/29/2025 0.00 16.62 Southwest Rental & Sales 10/29/2025 0.00 119.35 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION 10/29/2025 0.00 623.00 Thomas Olson 10/29/2025 0.00 32,000.00 Timothy Remington 10/29/2025 0.00 541.50 Twin Cities Transport & Recovery, Inc 10/29/2025 0.00 150.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 10/29/2025 0.00 190.16 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 10/29/2025 0.00 41,376.68 XCEL ENERGY INC 10/29/2025 0.00 34,875.54 Zillmer Tree Management LLC 10/29/2025 0.00 19,162.00 Report Total:0.00 4,227,277.53 Page 3 of 3 44 AP Check Detail User: dwashburn@chanhassenmn.gov Printed: 10/31/2025 9:53:03 AM Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Bildeaux Services 700-0000-4370 350.00 10/29/2025 chainsaw safety training Bildeaux Services 101-1550-4370 700.00 10/29/2025 chainsaw safety training Bildeaux Services 101-1320-4370 700.00 10/29/2025 chainsaw safety training Bildeaux Services 701-0000-4370 350.00 10/29/2025 chainsaw safety training 2,100.00 10/29/2025 Bildeaux Services 2,100.00 A Better Society 101-1425-4300 750.00 10/22/2025 Mobile Bike Repair Clinic 750.00 10/22/2025 A Better Society 750.00 ABM Equipment, LLC 101-1550-4530 2,472.62 10/22/2025 garbage truck repair 2,472.62 10/22/2025 ABM Equipment, LLC 2,472.62 Across The Street Productions 101-1220-4370 4,709.25 10/22/2025 Annual Blue Card Subscription for Fire Dept 4,709.25 10/22/2025 Across The Street Productions 101-1220-4360 125.00 10/29/2025 Young Blue Card Subscription 125.00 10/29/2025 AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 1 of 31 45 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Across The Street Productions 4,834.25 Ador LLC 101-0000-2073 5,100.00 10/22/2025 Erosion escrow 6681 Galpin Blvd #581794 5,100.00 10/22/2025 Ador LLC 5,100.00 Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 700-0000-4300 785.62 10/29/2025 pw/city hall generator. troubleshooting ls 23 Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 701-0000-4300 785.63 10/29/2025 pw/city hall generator. troubleshooting ls 23 1,571.25 10/29/2025 Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 1,571.25 Al-Hilwani Juli 101-1530-4347 412.50 10/22/2025 Personal Training 412.50 10/22/2025 Al-Hilwani Juli 412.50 ALL AMERICAN TITLE 700-0000-2020 1.69 10/22/2025 Refund Check 011432-000, 6636 BRENDEN COURT ALL AMERICAN TITLE 700-0000-2020 30.21 10/22/2025 Refund Check 011432-000, 6636 BRENDEN COURT ALL AMERICAN TITLE 720-0000-2020 23.88 10/22/2025 Refund Check 011432-000, 6636 BRENDEN COURT ALL AMERICAN TITLE 701-0000-2020 51.40 10/22/2025 Refund Check 011432-000, 6636 BRENDEN COURT ALL AMERICAN TITLE 700-0000-2020 35.01 10/22/2025 Refund Check 008294-000, 2227 STONE CREEK LANE EAST ALL AMERICAN TITLE 720-0000-2020 17.91 10/22/2025 Refund Check 008294-000, 2227 STONE CREEK LANE EAST ALL AMERICAN TITLE 700-0000-2020 1.27 10/22/2025 Refund Check 008294-000, 2227 STONE CREEK LANE EAST ALL AMERICAN TITLE 701-0000-2020 74.77 10/22/2025 Refund Check 008294-000, 2227 STONE CREEK LANE EAST 236.14 10/22/2025 ALL AMERICAN TITLE 236.14 American Pressure Inc 101-1370-4530 375.72 10/22/2025 pressure washer parts American Pressure Inc 101-1370-4530 -121.33 10/22/2025 pressure washer parts AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 2 of 31 46 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 254.39 10/22/2025 American Pressure Inc 254.39 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 101-1550-4120 84.54 10/22/2025 tire 84.54 10/22/2025 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 84.54 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4112 80.98 10/22/2025 Water Filter (received invoice late) 80.98 10/22/2025 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4112 289.33 10/29/2025 Coffee for City Hall ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4112 335.38 10/29/2025 PW Coffee Order ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4112 317.51 10/29/2025 Fire Coffee Order 942.22 10/29/2025 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 1,023.20 Arsenault Rachel 101-1420-4381 31.64 10/29/2025 Mileage to/from Campbell Knutson 31.64 10/29/2025 Arsenault Rachel 31.64 Badger State Inspection LLC 700-7019-4550 14,500.00 10/22/2025 Exterior Power Wash -1879 Lake Lucy 14,500.00 10/22/2025 Badger State Inspection LLC 101-1310-4359 202.50 10/29/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 Badger State Inspection LLC 700-0000-4303 1,500.00 10/29/2025 Additional Trips for Landscaping Review 1,702.50 10/29/2025 AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 3 of 31 47 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Badger State Inspection LLC 16,202.50 Bean Marcy 720-0000-4905 1,000.00 10/22/2025 Reimburse for RainGarden @1600 Koehnen Cir E 1,000.00 10/22/2025 Bean Marcy 1,000.00 BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 101-0000-2012 123.75 10/22/2025 Cobra admin/retiree billing BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 101-1120-4351 70.00 10/22/2025 Cobra qualifying event letters BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 101-1120-4351 120.00 10/22/2025 Tax Advantage Plan-Oct Nov & Dec 313.75 10/22/2025 BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 313.75 Benscher Noah 414-4010-4703 5,300.00 10/22/2025 Office Chairs 5,300.00 10/22/2025 Benscher Noah 5,300.00 BLY JACK 700-0000-2020 7.59 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103420-000, 6515 GRAY FOX CURVE BLY JACK 700-0000-2020 1.30 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103420-000, 6515 GRAY FOX CURVE BLY JACK 701-0000-2020 18.95 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103420-000, 6515 GRAY FOX CURVE BLY JACK 720-0000-2020 18.39 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103420-000, 6515 GRAY FOX CURVE 46.23 10/22/2025 BLY JACK 46.23 Bohlmann, Inc.101-1550-4300 123.50 10/29/2025 Memorial plaque 123.50 10/29/2025 Bohlmann, Inc. 123.50 AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 4 of 31 48 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description BOLTON & MENK INC 101-1310-4359 84.40 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 BOLTON & MENK INC 700-6048-4300 365.72 10/22/2025 Water @ 13% BOLTON & MENK INC 601-6048-4300 1,884.88 10/22/2025 PMP @ 67% BOLTON & MENK INC 601-6053-4303 56,142.00 10/22/2025 PMP @ 60% BOLTON & MENK INC 720-6048-4300 196.93 10/22/2025 Storm @ 7% BOLTON & MENK INC 720-6053-4303 20,585.40 10/22/2025 Storm @ 22% BOLTON & MENK INC 701-6048-4300 3,227.70 10/22/2025 Sanitary @ 13% BOLTON & MENK INC 601-6053-4303 44,475.90 10/22/2025 PMP @ 60% BOLTON & MENK INC 701-6053-4303 5,930.12 10/22/2025 Sanitary @ 8% BOLTON & MENK INC 601-6048-4300 16,635.10 10/22/2025 PMP @ 67% BOLTON & MENK INC 601-6053-4303 52,610.70 10/22/2025 PMP @ 60% BOLTON & MENK INC 700-6053-4303 8,768.45 10/22/2025 Water @ 10% BOLTON & MENK INC 700-6048-4300 3,227.70 10/22/2025 Water @ 13% BOLTON & MENK INC 720-6048-4300 1,738.00 10/22/2025 Storm @ 7% BOLTON & MENK INC 720-6053-4303 16,307.83 10/22/2025 Storm @ 22% BOLTON & MENK INC 700-6053-4303 7,412.65 10/22/2025 Water @ 10% BOLTON & MENK INC 101-1310-4359 1,315.27 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 BOLTON & MENK INC 701-6048-4300 1,596.72 10/22/2025 Sanitary @ 13% BOLTON & MENK INC 720-6048-4300 859.78 10/22/2025 Storm @ 7% BOLTON & MENK INC 101-1310-4359 184.24 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 BOLTON & MENK INC 700-6048-4300 1,596.72 10/22/2025 Water @ 13% BOLTON & MENK INC 601-6048-4300 8,229.28 10/22/2025 PMP @ 67% BOLTON & MENK INC 101-1310-4359 2,807.10 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 BOLTON & MENK INC 701-6048-4300 365.72 10/22/2025 Sewer @ 13% BOLTON & MENK INC 701-6053-4303 7,485.60 10/22/2025 Sanitary @ 8% BOLTON & MENK INC 700-6053-4303 9,357.00 10/22/2025 Water @ 10% BOLTON & MENK INC 701-6053-4303 7,014.76 10/22/2025 Sanitary @ 8% BOLTON & MENK INC 720-6053-4303 19,290.59 10/22/2025 Storm @ 22% 299,696.26 10/22/2025 BOLTON & MENK INC 299,696.26 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 601-6040-4300 2,978.50 10/22/2025 City @ 25% BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 101-1310-4359 357.42 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 601-6140-4300 8,935.50 10/22/2025 County @ 75% BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 101-1310-4359 567.02 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 601-6060-4300 12,600.50 10/22/2025 Construction Materials Testing #24-01 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 101-1310-4359 447.05 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 700-6053-4303 2,032.30 10/22/2025 Water @ 10% BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 601-6053-4303 12,193.80 10/22/2025 PMP @ 60% BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 701-6053-4303 1,625.84 10/22/2025 Sanitary @ 8% AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 5 of 31 49 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 720-6053-4303 4,471.06 10/22/2025 Storm @ 22% BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 601-6048-4303 8,720.00 10/22/2025 Crimson Bay Rd -CMT BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 414-4010-4303 4,517.00 10/22/2025 Civic Campus -CMT BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 601-6040-4300 3,725.37 10/22/2025 City @ 25% BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 601-6140-4300 11,176.13 10/22/2025 County @ 75% BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 601-6053-4303 3,316.00 10/22/2025 25-01 Construction Materials Testing BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 101-1310-4359 99.48 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 601-6064-4303 9,618.30 10/22/2025 #26-01 - Vasserman Ridge & Fox Hollow BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 101-1310-4359 144.27 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 87,525.54 10/22/2025 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 87,525.54 BROADCAST MUSIC INC 101-1530-4125 428.64 10/22/2025 1yr Music Rights Fee includes timely pay discount 428.64 10/22/2025 BROADCAST MUSIC INC 428.64 BROADWAY AWARDS 101-1120-4110 33.17 10/29/2025 Sam D and Joe S Nametags 33.17 10/29/2025 BROADWAY AWARDS 33.17 Burkett Nathan 700-7204-4901 100.00 10/29/2025 Water Wise Rebate- Dishwasher 100.00 10/29/2025 Burkett Nathan 100.00 BURNET TITLE 720-0000-2020 15.60 10/22/2025 Refund Check 013941-000, 1890 PARTRIDGE CIRCLE BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 1.11 10/22/2025 Refund Check 013941-000, 1890 PARTRIDGE CIRCLE BURNET TITLE 701-0000-2020 23.86 10/22/2025 Refund Check 013941-000, 1890 PARTRIDGE CIRCLE BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 25.25 10/22/2025 Refund Check 013941-000, 1890 PARTRIDGE CIRCLE BURNET TITLE 720-0000-2020 55.19 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018705-000, 7000 CHAPARRAL LANE BURNET TITLE 701-0000-2020 66.34 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018705-000, 7000 CHAPARRAL LANE BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 2.88 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018705-000, 7000 CHAPARRAL LANE AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 6 of 31 50 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description BURNET TITLE 701-0000-2020 14.41 10/22/2025 Refund Check 100744-000, 553 MISSION HILLS DRIVE BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 1.06 10/22/2025 Refund Check 100744-000, 553 MISSION HILLS DRIVE BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 5.76 10/22/2025 Refund Check 100744-000, 553 MISSION HILLS DRIVE BURNET TITLE 720-0000-2020 2.58 10/22/2025 Refund Check 100744-000, 553 MISSION HILLS DRIVE BURNET TITLE 701-0000-2020 11.78 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103812-000, 9195 EAGLE RIDGE ROAD BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 0.92 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103812-000, 9195 EAGLE RIDGE ROAD BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 28.80 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103812-000, 9195 EAGLE RIDGE ROAD BURNET TITLE 720-0000-2020 13.01 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103812-000, 9195 EAGLE RIDGE ROAD BURNET TITLE 720-0000-2020 16.52 10/22/2025 Refund Check 097057-000, 8795 NORTH BAY DRIVE BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 1.17 10/22/2025 Refund Check 097057-000, 8795 NORTH BAY DRIVE BURNET TITLE 701-0000-2020 22.06 10/22/2025 Refund Check 097057-000, 8795 NORTH BAY DRIVE BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 12.70 10/22/2025 Refund Check 097057-000, 8795 NORTH BAY DRIVE 321.00 10/22/2025 BURNET TITLE 321.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 101-0000-2076 600.00 10/22/2025 Pioneer Ridge Development Escrow CAMPBELL KNUTSON 101-1140-4302 18,319.09 10/22/2025 Legal Fees-September 2025 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 601-6040-4701 79.66 10/22/2025 Galpin Blvd 25% City CAMPBELL KNUTSON 101-0000-2076 1,080.00 10/22/2025 Avienda Apartments Escrow CAMPBELL KNUTSON 601-6140-4701 238.98 10/22/2025 Galpin Blvd 75% County CAMPBELL KNUTSON 601-6058-4701 90.50 10/22/2025 MMSW Condemnation 20,408.23 10/22/2025 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 20,408.23 Capital Siding Windows & Roofing 101-1250-3301 120.00 10/22/2025 Permit cancelled - 4137 Red Oak Ln 120.00 10/22/2025 Capital Siding Windows & Roofing 120.00 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1120-1193 69.91 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-7019-4320 1,051.52 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1540-4320 207.71 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1550-4320 227.93 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1600-4320 17.02 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-0000-4320 75.57 10/29/2025 Electric Charges AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 7 of 31 51 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 701-0000-4320 1,301.46 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1540-4320 357.51 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1350-4320 2,970.86 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1350-4320 1,793.92 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-7019-4320 1,774.34 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1120-1193 73.55 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-7019-4320 1,124.85 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-0000-4320 75.25 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 701-0000-4320 776.10 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1550-4320 381.08 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1600-4320 29.18 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-0000-4320 112.80 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1120-1193 121.61 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1550-4320 236.72 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1600-4320 17.81 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1540-4320 217.19 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-7019-4320 617.75 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1550-4320 123.59 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 701-0000-4320 402.56 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-0000-4320 90.01 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1350-4320 2,085.04 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1600-4320 20.78 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-7019-4320 1,311.40 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1350-4320 1,014.55 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1120-1193 41.24 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-0000-4320 30.79 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1540-4320 119.09 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1540-4320 253.29 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 701-0000-4320 765.07 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1350-4320 1,700.77 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 701-0000-4320 909.95 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1600-4320 9.74 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1550-4320 277.37 10/29/2025 Electric Charges CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1120-1193 85.57 10/29/2025 Electric Charges 22,872.45 10/29/2025 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 22,872.45 CDW GOVERNMENT LLC 101-1160-4205 11,464.40 10/22/2025 Cybereason EDR/MDR Annual Renewal AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 8 of 31 52 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 11,464.40 10/22/2025 CDW GOVERNMENT LLC 11,464.40 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1190-4321 120.77 10/22/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1220-4321 104.96 10/22/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1530-4321 68.33 10/22/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1170-4321 411.02 10/22/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 700-7019-4321 37.90 10/22/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1312-4321 85.12 10/22/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 700-0000-4321 32.64 10/22/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 701-0000-4321 46.07 10/22/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1600-4321 22.00 10/22/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1550-4321 37.00 10/22/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 700-7043-4321 85.85 10/22/2025 Gas Charges 1,051.66 10/22/2025 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 1,051.66 CenturyLink 701-0000-4310 32.00 10/22/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CenturyLink 700-0000-4310 32.00 10/22/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CenturyLink 700-7043-4310 64.96 10/22/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges 128.96 10/22/2025 CENTURYLINK 700-0000-4310 15.62 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 101-1350-4310 30.85 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 701-0000-4310 15.62 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 701-0000-4310 6.17 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 700-0000-4310 6.17 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 101-1540-4310 62.06 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 101-1550-4310 30.85 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 700-7019-4310 217.21 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 101-1312-4310 49.36 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 101-1170-4310 159.08 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges 592.99 10/29/2025 AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 9 of 31 53 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description CENTURYLINK 721.95 Chan Three Development Inc 601-6040-4300 1,110.81 10/22/2025 City @ 25% Chan Three Development Inc 601-6140-4300 3,332.43 10/22/2025 County @ 75% Chan Three Development Inc 101-1310-4359 66.65 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 4,509.89 10/22/2025 Chan Three Development Inc 4,509.89 CHARCHIAN SAM 720-0000-2020 7.72 10/22/2025 Refund Check 095464-000, 8795 BELLEVUE COURT CHARCHIAN SAM 700-0000-2020 0.55 10/22/2025 Refund Check 095464-000, 8795 BELLEVUE COURT CHARCHIAN SAM 701-0000-2020 21.96 10/22/2025 Refund Check 095464-000, 8795 BELLEVUE COURT CHARCHIAN SAM 700-0000-2020 100.18 10/22/2025 Refund Check 095464-000, 8795 BELLEVUE COURT 130.41 10/22/2025 CHARCHIAN SAM 130.41 City of Bloomington 720-0000-4323 464.00 10/22/2025 Beach Monitoring 464.00 10/22/2025 City of Bloomington 464.00 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 701-0000-2008 15.30 10/29/2025 October premium Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 700-0000-2008 75.96 10/29/2025 October premium 91.26 10/29/2025 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 91.26 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.101-1120-4110 1,737.72 10/22/2025 Cleaning Supplies 1,737.72 10/22/2025 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.101-1120-4110 232.84 10/29/2025 Cleaning Supplies AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 10 of 31 54 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 232.84 10/29/2025 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC. 1,970.56 Danial Reem 101-1539-4343 302.40 10/22/2025 Zumba Instructor 302.40 10/22/2025 Danial Reem 302.40 DENALI CUSTOM HOMES INC 101-0000-2075 750.00 10/29/2025 Landscape Escrow-7450 Chanhassen Rd. 750.00 10/29/2025 DENALI CUSTOM HOMES INC 750.00 Dingman Custom Homes 101-0000-2073 2,920.00 10/22/2025 Erosion escrow 3870 Glendale Dr #528097 2,920.00 10/22/2025 Dingman Custom Homes 2,920.00 Ditch Witch of Minnesota & Iowa 101-1320-4120 95.84 10/29/2025 fuel filter 95.84 10/29/2025 Ditch Witch of Minnesota & Iowa 95.84 Dorsey and Whitney, LLP 416-0000-4302 12,727.00 10/29/2025 Comm Center Land Acquisition 12,727.00 10/29/2025 Dorsey and Whitney, LLP 12,727.00 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 101-1250-4300 28.21 10/29/2025 PH Notice - Delinquent Code Violations ECM PUBLISHERS INC 700-0000-4336 145.08 10/29/2025 PH Notice - Delinquent Utilities AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 11 of 31 55 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description ECM PUBLISHERS INC 101-1310-4336 285.98 10/29/2025 PH Dogwood Vacation 10.13.25 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 701-0000-4336 145.08 10/29/2025 PH Notice - Delinquent Utilities 604.35 10/29/2025 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 604.35 Edina Heating & Cooling Inc 700-0000-4510 7,785.00 10/29/2025 R&R mini split well#2 Edina Heating & Cooling Inc 101-1550-4510 259.00 10/29/2025 Furnace Repair 7700 Lake Ann Park Dr 8,044.00 10/29/2025 Edina Heating & Cooling Inc 8,044.00 EDINA REALTY TITLE 700-0000-2020 13.95 10/22/2025 Refund Check 014171-000, 1110 DOVE COURT EDINA REALTY TITLE 720-0000-2020 15.84 10/22/2025 Refund Check 014171-000, 1110 DOVE COURT EDINA REALTY TITLE 701-0000-2020 31.61 10/22/2025 Refund Check 014171-000, 1110 DOVE COURT EDINA REALTY TITLE 700-0000-2020 1.12 10/22/2025 Refund Check 014171-000, 1110 DOVE COURT 62.52 10/22/2025 EDINA REALTY TITLE 62.52 Environmental Plant Services, Inc 414-4010-4702 9,500.00 10/29/2025 Hazmat removals - City Hall 9,500.00 10/29/2025 Environmental Plant Services, Inc 9,500.00 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 720-7207-4150 1,244.00 10/22/2025 stormwater ring 1,244.00 10/22/2025 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 1,244.00 Ewasiuk Michael 700-7204-4901 100.00 10/29/2025 Water Wise Rebate- Clothes Washer AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 12 of 31 56 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 100.00 10/29/2025 Ewasiuk Michael 100.00 Federal Signal Corporation 402-4020-4530 7,345.00 10/29/2025 Emergency Siren #9 Control Box replacement 7,345.00 10/29/2025 Federal Signal Corporation 7,345.00 FETSCH KELLY & ALEXANDER 700-0000-2020 755.66 10/22/2025 Refund Check 097947-000, 8572 ALISA COURT FETSCH KELLY & ALEXANDER 720-0000-2020 243.60 10/22/2025 Refund Check 097947-000, 8572 ALISA COURT FETSCH KELLY & ALEXANDER 700-0000-2020 17.26 10/22/2025 Refund Check 097947-000, 8572 ALISA COURT FETSCH KELLY & ALEXANDER 701-0000-2020 479.68 10/22/2025 Refund Check 097947-000, 8572 ALISA COURT 1,496.20 10/22/2025 FETSCH KELLY & ALEXANDER 1,496.20 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE 700-0000-2020 1.06 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102324-000, 6381 OXBOW BEND FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE 700-0000-2020 165.10 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102324-000, 6381 OXBOW BEND FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE 720-0000-2020 14.97 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102324-000, 6381 OXBOW BEND FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE 701-0000-2020 30.97 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102324-000, 6381 OXBOW BEND 212.10 10/22/2025 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE 212.10 Field Environmental Consulting Inc 414-4010-4702 500.00 10/29/2025 Civic Campus Asbestos Abatement 500.00 10/29/2025 Field Environmental Consulting Inc 500.00 Gavin Patrick 101-1125-4381 837.61 10/29/2025 LV Conference AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 13 of 31 57 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 837.61 10/29/2025 Gavin Patrick 837.61 GIL VILLEGAS & TOMI SAWWER KARLEY 701-0000-2020 13.74 10/22/2025 Refund Check 104388-000, 7051 CHAPARRAL LANE GIL VILLEGAS & TOMI SAWWER KARLEY 700-0000-2020 3.21 10/22/2025 Refund Check 104388-000, 7051 CHAPARRAL LANE GIL VILLEGAS & TOMI SAWWER KARLEY 720-0000-2020 6.86 10/22/2025 Refund Check 104388-000, 7051 CHAPARRAL LANE GIL VILLEGAS & TOMI SAWWER KARLEY 700-0000-2020 0.49 10/22/2025 Refund Check 104388-000, 7051 CHAPARRAL LANE 24.30 10/22/2025 GIL VILLEGAS & TOMI SAWWER KARLEY 24.30 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7043-4160 4,044.52 10/22/2025 chemicals west treatment plant 4,044.52 10/22/2025 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7043-4160 3,833.53 10/29/2025 chemicals HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7019-4160 7,764.38 10/29/2025 chemicals supplies 11,597.91 10/29/2025 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 15,642.43 HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 70,755.69 10/22/2025 Health premium-November HealthPartners, Inc.701-0000-2012 3,655.86 10/22/2025 Health premium-November HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2013 4,228.48 10/22/2025 Dental premium-November HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 2,251.26 10/22/2025 Health premium-November HealthPartners, Inc.700-0000-2012 5,537.31 10/22/2025 Health premium-November HealthPartners, Inc.720-0000-2012 1,297.56 10/22/2025 Health premium-November HealthPartners, Inc.700-0000-2013 336.38 10/22/2025 Dental premium-November HealthPartners, Inc.701-0000-2013 288.35 10/22/2025 Dental premium-November HealthPartners, Inc.720-0000-2013 96.08 10/22/2025 Dental premium-November 88,446.97 10/22/2025 HealthPartners, Inc. 88,446.97 AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 14 of 31 58 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description HERNANDEZ JASON & ELIZABETH 700-0000-2020 1.32 10/22/2025 Refund Check 101087-000, 1710 VALLEY RIDGE TR S HERNANDEZ JASON & ELIZABETH 701-0000-2020 49.73 10/22/2025 Refund Check 101087-000, 1710 VALLEY RIDGE TR S HERNANDEZ JASON & ELIZABETH 720-0000-2020 18.63 10/22/2025 Refund Check 101087-000, 1710 VALLEY RIDGE TR S HERNANDEZ JASON & ELIZABETH 700-0000-2020 31.80 10/22/2025 Refund Check 101087-000, 1710 VALLEY RIDGE TR S 101.48 10/22/2025 HERNANDEZ JASON & ELIZABETH 101.48 Hilgers Mike 601-6053-4751 1,009.00 10/29/2025 Driveway Reimbursement 1,009.00 10/29/2025 Hilgers Mike 1,009.00 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 414-4010-4300 4,600.00 10/22/2025 Civic Campus Planning & LA 4,600.00 10/22/2025 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 4,600.00 Hornung Mark 700-7204-4901 100.00 10/29/2025 Water Wise Rebate-Clothes Washer 100.00 10/29/2025 Hornung Mark 100.00 Houston Engineering Inc 101-1310-4359 109.43 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 Houston Engineering Inc 601-6054-4303 7,295.50 10/22/2025 26-01 7,404.93 10/22/2025 Houston Engineering Inc 400-0000-1155 1,403.00 10/29/2025 Audubon Business Park Houston Engineering Inc 400-0000-1155 61.00 10/29/2025 Xcel Service Center Houston Engineering Inc 701-7025-4300 8,107.25 10/29/2025 Lift Station #5 9,571.25 10/29/2025 AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 15 of 31 59 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Houston Engineering Inc 16,976.18 I & S Group, Inc 601-6064-4303 19,617.50 10/22/2025 2026 Lake Dr E Project I & S Group, Inc 101-1310-4359 588.53 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 I & S Group, Inc 601-6064-4303 5,572.50 10/22/2025 professional services I & S Group, Inc 101-1310-4359 83.59 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 I & S Group, Inc 601-6064-4303 12,260.00 10/22/2025 2026 Lake Dr E Project 38,122.12 10/22/2025 I & S Group, Inc 38,122.12 Infosend, Inc 720-1130-4111 294.25 10/29/2025 September Statements Infosend, Inc 700-1130-4111 294.26 10/29/2025 September Statements Infosend, Inc 701-1130-4330 1,039.71 10/29/2025 September Postage Infosend, Inc 701-1130-4111 294.26 10/29/2025 September Statements Infosend, Inc 720-1130-4330 1,039.70 10/29/2025 September Postage Infosend, Inc 700-1130-4330 1,039.71 10/29/2025 September Postage 4,001.89 10/29/2025 Infosend, Inc 4,001.89 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1120-4110 113.87 10/22/2025 Printer Paper Postit Notes Pens 113.87 10/22/2025 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1120-4110 97.84 10/29/2025 Address labels 97.84 10/29/2025 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 211.71 JI Tile LLC 101-0000-2073 500.00 10/29/2025 Erosion escrow 2125 Longacres Dr #695559 500.00 10/29/2025 AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 16 of 31 60 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description JI Tile LLC 500.00 Johnson Eric 700-7204-4901 50.00 10/29/2025 Water Wise Rebate- Irrigation Controller 50.00 10/29/2025 Johnson Eric 50.00 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 101-1140-4302 46.00 10/22/2025 Labor/Employment Matters 46.00 10/22/2025 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 46.00 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 601-6059-4300 16,084.20 10/22/2025 Pleasant View Rd 16,084.20 10/22/2025 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 16,084.20 KonectaUSA LLC 414-4010-4702 91,475.20 10/22/2025 Civic Campus First Responder Radio Repeater 91,475.20 10/22/2025 KonectaUSA LLC 91,475.20 Larson Cathy 700-7204-4901 100.00 10/29/2025 Water Wise Rebate- Clothes Washer 100.00 10/29/2025 Larson Cathy 100.00 Lawson Products, Inc.700-0000-4120 262.32 10/29/2025 Pins/Bolts Lawson Products, Inc.101-1550-4120 262.32 10/29/2025 Pins/Bolts Lawson Products, Inc.101-1320-4120 262.32 10/29/2025 Pins/Bolts AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 17 of 31 61 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 786.96 10/29/2025 Lawson Products, Inc. 786.96 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 101-1120-4370 50.00 10/29/2025 APMP Conference - M Unmacht 50.00 10/29/2025 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 50.00 LEPAGE JASON & LI 700-0000-2020 1.39 10/22/2025 Refund Check 099420-000, 1610 WEST 63RD STREET LEPAGE JASON & LI 701-0000-2020 31.21 10/22/2025 Refund Check 099420-000, 1610 WEST 63RD STREET LEPAGE JASON & LI 700-0000-2020 23.13 10/22/2025 Refund Check 099420-000, 1610 WEST 63RD STREET LEPAGE JASON & LI 720-0000-2020 19.66 10/22/2025 Refund Check 099420-000, 1610 WEST 63RD STREET 75.39 10/22/2025 LEPAGE JASON & LI 75.39 Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P 101-1110-4312 3,333.33 10/22/2025 Lobbying expenses-October 2025 3,333.33 10/22/2025 Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P 3,333.33 LoScalzo Michael 700-7204-4901 50.00 10/29/2025 Water Wise Rebate-Irrigation Controller 50.00 10/29/2025 LoScalzo Michael 50.00 Macqueen Emergency Group 201-0000-4705 1,917.28 10/22/2025 2 ice rescue suits 1,917.28 10/22/2025 AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 18 of 31 62 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Macqueen Emergency Group 1,917.28 Marco Inc 101-1160-4411 735.00 10/22/2025 Copier Lease 735.00 10/22/2025 Marco Inc 735.00 MCDEVITT TY & CLAIRE 700-0000-2020 73.89 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102349-000, 8525 MISSION HILLS LANE 73.89 10/22/2025 MCDEVITT TY & CLAIRE 73.89 MEIER GRETCHEN & JOSEPH 720-0000-2020 2.64 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102595-000, 8945 SOUTHWEST VILLAGE LOOP MEIER GRETCHEN & JOSEPH 700-0000-2020 15.81 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102595-000, 8945 SOUTHWEST VILLAGE LOOP MEIER GRETCHEN & JOSEPH 701-0000-2020 27.98 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102595-000, 8945 SOUTHWEST VILLAGE LOOP MEIER GRETCHEN & JOSEPH 700-0000-2020 0.97 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102595-000, 8945 SOUTHWEST VILLAGE LOOP 47.40 10/22/2025 MEIER GRETCHEN & JOSEPH 47.40 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4260 74.96 10/22/2025 Blades Dusting Brush Car Nozzel MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4510 18.98 10/22/2025 Rib Anc Blu Lexel Clear Caulk MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 700-7019-4120 24.27 10/22/2025 Adapter Tube Braid MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 700-7043-4120 5.18 10/22/2025 Tarp Strap Rubber 19"" MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4120 46.55 10/22/2025 Roller wht Dove Wire Cup Coarse Tote MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4150 78.96 10/22/2025 Stain & Sealter Paint Care Gallon Fee Adhs MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4151 7.59 10/22/2025 Primer PVC MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1320-4240 251.98 10/22/2025 Apron Chaps Wrap Chaps MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1220-4144 39.75 10/22/2025 Grade Stake MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 700-0000-4150 73.56 10/22/2025 Tube Poly Maibox Roughneck Blk Bee & Wasp Killer 621.78 10/22/2025 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 621.78 AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 19 of 31 63 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Mesenbrink Construction and Engineering Inc 101-0000-2021 -125.76 10/22/2025 Sales Tax Mesenbrink Construction and Engineering Inc 101-0000-2076 3,500.00 10/22/2025 Meter Deposit Refund Mesenbrink Construction and Engineering Inc 700-0000-3666 -1,416.96 10/22/2025 Bulk Water 1,957.28 10/22/2025 Mesenbrink Construction and Engineering Inc 1,957.28 Metro Garage Door Company 101-1220-4510 605.00 10/29/2025 over head door repairs Metro Garage Door Company 101-1220-4510 3,032.97 10/29/2025 remove & replace door opener 3,637.97 10/29/2025 Metro Garage Door Company 3,637.97 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 700-0000-2036 131.14 10/29/2025 2025 Unclaimed Property MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 701-0000-2036 127.25 10/29/2025 2025 Unclaimed Property MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 101-0000-2036 1,009.86 10/29/2025 2025 Unclaimed Property MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 720-0000-2036 34.02 10/29/2025 2025 Unclaimed Property 1,302.27 10/29/2025 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 1,302.27 Minnesota Valley Landscape Inc 601-6051-4300 650.20 10/22/2025 Replace Apple Tree from Trail Minnesota Valley Landscape Inc 101-1310-4359 10.00 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 660.20 10/22/2025 Minnesota Valley Landscape Inc 660.20 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 260.45 10/22/2025 Electric Charges MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 121.97 10/22/2025 Electric Charges 382.42 10/22/2025 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 47.65 10/29/2025 Electric Charges MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 147.58 10/29/2025 Electric Charges AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 20 of 31 64 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 195.23 10/29/2025 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 577.65 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 101-1550-4120 23.88 10/22/2025 mower parts MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 101-1550-4120 20.21 10/22/2025 thermostat / ball joint MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 101-1550-4120 95.34 10/22/2025 mower part 139.43 10/22/2025 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 139.43 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1250-4140 36.99 10/22/2025 transmission filter 36.99 10/22/2025 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1320-4120 33.98 10/29/2025 brake fitting NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1320-4120 65.00 10/29/2025 filters / bulbs NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1320-4120 -20.41 10/29/2025 filters NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1550-4120 35.17 10/29/2025 bearing NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1550-4120 109.94 10/29/2025 bearing / flange 223.68 10/29/2025 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 260.67 North American Safety, Inc.700-0000-4240 296.94 10/29/2025 safety vest North American Safety, Inc.701-0000-4240 296.94 10/29/2025 safety vest 593.88 10/29/2025 North American Safety, Inc. 593.88 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 601-6048-4751 540,986.10 10/22/2025 PMP NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 701-6048-4751 54,720.48 10/22/2025 Sanitary NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 700-6048-4751 8,708.79 10/22/2025 Water NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 720-6048-4751 21,047.58 10/22/2025 Storm AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 21 of 31 65 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 625,462.95 10/22/2025 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 625,462.95 Olson Thomas 402-1316-4702 32,000.00 10/29/2025 replacement salt dome cover 32,000.00 10/29/2025 Olson Thomas 32,000.00 Panera LLC 101-0000-2076 7,100.00 10/29/2025 Security Escrow- 531 West 79th Street - #376666 7,100.00 10/29/2025 Panera LLC 7,100.00 PAPEDIS; TRUSTEE OF THE OJARS OJARS 701-0000-2020 1.10 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018535-000, 2101 PINEHURST DRIVE PAPEDIS; TRUSTEE OF THE OJARS OJARS 720-0000-2020 13.67 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018535-000, 2101 PINEHURST DRIVE PAPEDIS; TRUSTEE OF THE OJARS OJARS 700-0000-2020 0.97 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018535-000, 2101 PINEHURST DRIVE PAPEDIS; TRUSTEE OF THE OJARS OJARS 700-0000-2020 67.11 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018535-000, 2101 PINEHURST DRIVE 82.85 10/22/2025 PAPEDIS; TRUSTEE OF THE OJARS OJARS 82.85 PAULSON TYLER 700-0000-2020 18.86 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103636-000, 95 OLYMPIC CIRCLE PAULSON TYLER 700-0000-2020 1.74 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103636-000, 95 OLYMPIC CIRCLE PAULSON TYLER 701-0000-2020 32.73 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103636-000, 95 OLYMPIC CIRCLE PAULSON TYLER 720-0000-2020 24.52 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103636-000, 95 OLYMPIC CIRCLE 77.85 10/22/2025 PAULSON TYLER 77.85 Pinnacle Pest Control 700-0000-4510 290.00 10/22/2025 pest control Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1550-4510 160.00 10/22/2025 pest control Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1530-4510 80.00 10/22/2025 pest control AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 22 of 31 66 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1170-4510 200.00 10/22/2025 pest control 730.00 10/22/2025 Pinnacle Pest Control 730.00 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 700-0000-4140 684.20 10/29/2025 tires 684.20 10/29/2025 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 684.20 PRESTIGE POOLS 101-0000-2073 1,000.00 10/22/2025 Erosion escrow 6681 Galpin Blvd #620048 1,000.00 10/22/2025 PRESTIGE POOLS 1,000.00 Pro-Tree Outdoor Services 101-1425-4572 1,320.00 10/22/2025 Tree Removal ROW hazard trees 1,320.00 10/22/2025 Pro-Tree Outdoor Services 1,320.00 Rademacher Daniel 720-7207-4150 190.00 10/29/2025 removal of beaver in pond 190.00 10/29/2025 Rademacher Daniel 190.00 Reeves Ross 700-7204-4901 100.00 10/29/2025 Water WIse Rebate- Clothes Washer 100.00 10/29/2025 Reeves Ross 100.00 Remington Timothy 601-6053-4751 541.50 10/29/2025 Driveway Reimbursement AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 23 of 31 67 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 541.50 10/29/2025 Remington Timothy 541.50 RESULTS TITLE 700-0000-2020 5.79 10/22/2025 Refund Check 008724-000, 7474 MOCCASIN TRAIL RESULTS TITLE 700-0000-2020 0.61 10/22/2025 Refund Check 008724-000, 7474 MOCCASIN TRAIL RESULTS TITLE 701-0000-2020 4.87 10/22/2025 Refund Check 008724-000, 7474 MOCCASIN TRAIL RESULTS TITLE 720-0000-2020 8.60 10/22/2025 Refund Check 008724-000, 7474 MOCCASIN TRAIL 19.87 10/22/2025 RESULTS TITLE 19.87 ROADKILL ANIMAL CONTROL 101-1320-4300 129.00 10/22/2025 roadkill animal 129.00 10/22/2025 ROADKILL ANIMAL CONTROL 129.00 Ryan Contracting Company 700-6053-4751 362,118.77 10/29/2025 Water-2025 Pavement Rehab Ryan Contracting Company 601-6053-4751 865,602.95 10/29/2025 PMP-2025 Pavement Rehab Ryan Contracting Company 720-6053-4751 276,992.92 10/29/2025 Storm-2025 Pavement Rehab Ryan Contracting Company 701-6053-4751 156,953.15 10/29/2025 Sanitary-2025 Pavement Rehab 1,661,667.79 10/29/2025 Ryan Contracting Company 1,661,667.79 Sazdoff Karen 700-7204-4901 50.00 10/29/2025 Water Wise Rebate- Toilet 50.00 10/29/2025 Sazdoff Karen 50.00 SEH 410-4410-4300 1,744.57 10/29/2025 Lake Ann Park Preserve AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 24 of 31 68 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 1,744.57 10/29/2025 SEH 1,744.57 Shaik Rahamthunnisa 101-1110-4375 165.00 10/22/2025 Nov. 1 open house balloon artist 165.00 10/22/2025 Shaik Rahamthunnisa 165.00 SHREVE DANIEL S.700-0000-2020 3.51 10/22/2025 Refund Check 017782-000, 7595 WALNUT CURVE SHREVE DANIEL S.701-0000-2020 37.54 10/22/2025 Refund Check 017782-000, 7595 WALNUT CURVE SHREVE DANIEL S.720-0000-2020 49.53 10/22/2025 Refund Check 017782-000, 7595 WALNUT CURVE SHREVE DANIEL S.700-0000-2020 20.06 10/22/2025 Refund Check 017782-000, 7595 WALNUT CURVE 110.64 10/22/2025 SHREVE DANIEL S. 110.64 Siegel-Carlson Alexis 701-7060-4901 8,910.00 10/22/2025 PPII Grant Program Reimburse for 411 Highland Dr 8,910.00 10/22/2025 Siegel-Carlson Alexis 8,910.00 Silva Screenprinting & Dist, LLC 101-1520-4130 98.11 10/22/2025 City Council sweatshirts 98.11 10/22/2025 Silva Screenprinting & Dist, LLC 98.11 SM HENTGES & SONS 700-6040-4751 15,314.58 10/29/2025 Water- City @100% SM HENTGES & SONS 601-6140-4751 684,279.82 10/29/2025 County @ 75% SM HENTGES & SONS 701-6040-4751 1,140.01 10/29/2025 Sanitary- City @ 100% SM HENTGES & SONS 601-6040-4751 228,093.27 10/29/2025 City @ 25% AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 25 of 31 69 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 928,827.68 10/29/2025 SM HENTGES & SONS 928,827.68 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 101-1370-4260 16.62 10/29/2025 screw driver 16.62 10/29/2025 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 16.62 Southwest Rental & Sales 101-1320-4410 119.35 10/29/2025 skid loader auger and auger attachment 119.35 10/29/2025 Southwest Rental & Sales 119.35 SPILANE MATTHEW 700-0000-2020 3.44 10/22/2025 Refund Check 099525-000, 509 DEL RIO DRIVE SPILANE MATTHEW 701-0000-2020 6.75 10/22/2025 Refund Check 099525-000, 509 DEL RIO DRIVE SPILANE MATTHEW 700-0000-2020 0.65 10/22/2025 Refund Check 099525-000, 509 DEL RIO DRIVE SPILANE MATTHEW 720-0000-2020 9.25 10/22/2025 Refund Check 099525-000, 509 DEL RIO DRIVE 20.09 10/22/2025 SPILANE MATTHEW 20.09 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 601-6058-4303 254.56 10/22/2025 TH41/MMSW 254.56 10/22/2025 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 254.56 Stericycle, Inc 101-1120-4300 229.00 10/22/2025 Shredding Bin Swap 229.00 10/22/2025 AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 26 of 31 70 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Stericycle, Inc 229.00 STEWART TITLE COMPANY 700-0000-2020 0.99 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102104-000, 721 CONESTOGA TRAIL STEWART TITLE COMPANY 700-0000-2020 19.15 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102104-000, 721 CONESTOGA TRAIL STEWART TITLE COMPANY 701-0000-2020 34.48 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102104-000, 721 CONESTOGA TRAIL STEWART TITLE COMPANY 720-0000-2020 13.94 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102104-000, 721 CONESTOGA TRAIL 68.56 10/22/2025 STEWART TITLE COMPANY 68.56 STONE ARCH TITLE LLC 720-0000-2020 13.78 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103305-000, 7154 ALPHABET STREET STONE ARCH TITLE LLC 700-0000-2020 0.97 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103305-000, 7154 ALPHABET STREET STONE ARCH TITLE LLC 701-0000-2020 10.31 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103305-000, 7154 ALPHABET STREET STONE ARCH TITLE LLC 700-0000-2020 23.38 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103305-000, 7154 ALPHABET STREET 48.44 10/22/2025 STONE ARCH TITLE LLC 48.44 StreetLight Data, Inc 101-1310-4229 6,751.00 10/22/2025 StreetLight Insight Subscription 6,751.00 10/22/2025 StreetLight Data, Inc 6,751.00 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION 101-1220-4510 623.00 10/29/2025 fire alarm monitoring 2025-26 623.00 10/29/2025 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION 623.00 THE TITLE GROUP INC 720-0000-2020 32.90 10/22/2025 Refund Check 096966-000, 1748 VALLEY RIDGE PL THE TITLE GROUP INC 701-0000-2020 37.83 10/22/2025 Refund Check 096966-000, 1748 VALLEY RIDGE PL THE TITLE GROUP INC 700-0000-2020 28.78 10/22/2025 Refund Check 096966-000, 1748 VALLEY RIDGE PL THE TITLE GROUP INC 700-0000-2020 2.33 10/22/2025 Refund Check 096966-000, 1748 VALLEY RIDGE PL AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 27 of 31 71 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 101.84 10/22/2025 THE TITLE GROUP INC 101.84 TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 720-0000-2020 16.58 10/22/2025 Refund Check 104046-000, 910 PENAMINT COURT TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 700-0000-2020 20.20 10/22/2025 Refund Check 104046-000, 910 PENAMINT COURT TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 700-0000-2020 1.18 10/22/2025 Refund Check 104046-000, 910 PENAMINT COURT TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 701-0000-2020 39.70 10/22/2025 Refund Check 104046-000, 910 PENAMINT COURT TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 701-0000-2020 15.37 10/22/2025 Refund Check 098332-000, 2771 CENTURY CIRCLE TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 700-0000-2020 1.11 10/22/2025 Refund Check 098332-000, 2771 CENTURY CIRCLE TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 700-0000-2020 10.31 10/22/2025 Refund Check 098332-000, 2771 CENTURY CIRCLE TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 720-0000-2020 2.04 10/22/2025 Refund Check 098332-000, 2771 CENTURY CIRCLE 106.49 10/22/2025 TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 106.49 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 700-0000-2020 0.51 10/22/2025 Refund Check 095662-000, 512 WEST 76TH STREET TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 701-0000-2020 10.07 10/22/2025 Refund Check 095662-000, 512 WEST 76TH STREET TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 700-0000-2020 8.57 10/22/2025 Refund Check 095662-000, 512 WEST 76TH STREET TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 720-0000-2020 7.21 10/22/2025 Refund Check 095662-000, 512 WEST 76TH STREET 26.36 10/22/2025 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 26.36 TROWBRIDGE ANA & ANTHONY 700-0000-2020 1.15 10/22/2025 Refund Check 098305-000, 6976 PIMA LANE TROWBRIDGE ANA & ANTHONY 700-0000-2020 8.19 10/22/2025 Refund Check 098305-000, 6976 PIMA LANE TROWBRIDGE ANA & ANTHONY 701-0000-2020 16.07 10/22/2025 Refund Check 098305-000, 6976 PIMA LANE TROWBRIDGE ANA & ANTHONY 720-0000-2020 7.71 10/22/2025 Refund Check 098305-000, 6976 PIMA LANE 33.12 10/22/2025 TROWBRIDGE ANA & ANTHONY 33.12 Twin Cities Transport & Recovery, Inc 101-1220-4370 150.00 10/29/2025 car for fire training AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 28 of 31 72 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 150.00 10/29/2025 Twin Cities Transport & Recovery, Inc 150.00 VALLEY-RICH CO INC 700-0000-4550 1,140.00 10/22/2025 repair operating nut VALLEY-RICH CO INC 700-0000-4550 820.00 10/22/2025 repair operating nut 1,960.00 10/22/2025 VALLEY-RICH CO INC 1,960.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 700-0000-4310 95.08 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges VERIZON WIRELESS 701-0000-4310 95.08 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges 190.16 10/29/2025 VERIZON WIRELESS 190.16 WAKEFIELD AMY & ADAM 720-0000-2020 4.26 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018722-000, 6451 DEVONSHIRE DRIVE WAKEFIELD AMY & ADAM 700-0000-2020 0.30 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018722-000, 6451 DEVONSHIRE DRIVE WAKEFIELD AMY & ADAM 701-0000-2020 75.66 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018722-000, 6451 DEVONSHIRE DRIVE WAKEFIELD AMY & ADAM 700-0000-2020 32.30 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018722-000, 6451 DEVONSHIRE DRIVE 112.52 10/22/2025 WAKEFIELD AMY & ADAM 112.52 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 700-0000-2020 4.31 10/22/2025 Refund Check 005692-000, 861 LAKE SUSAN DRIVE WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 700-0000-2020 0.51 10/22/2025 Refund Check 005692-000, 861 LAKE SUSAN DRIVE WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 701-0000-2020 7.63 10/22/2025 Refund Check 005692-000, 861 LAKE SUSAN DRIVE WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 720-0000-2020 7.24 10/22/2025 Refund Check 005692-000, 861 LAKE SUSAN DRIVE 19.69 10/22/2025 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 19.69 WEST TITLE LLC 700-0000-2020 0.71 10/22/2025 Refund Check 101371-000, 8716 NORTH BAY DRIVE AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 29 of 31 73 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description WEST TITLE LLC 700-0000-2020 3.15 10/22/2025 Refund Check 101371-000, 8716 NORTH BAY DRIVE WEST TITLE LLC 701-0000-2020 0.66 10/22/2025 Refund Check 101371-000, 8716 NORTH BAY DRIVE WEST TITLE LLC 720-0000-2020 3.86 10/22/2025 Refund Check 101371-000, 8716 NORTH BAY DRIVE 8.38 10/22/2025 WEST TITLE LLC 8.38 WINKEL CONRAD A.700-0000-2020 21.19 10/22/2025 Refund Check 007134-000, 505 HIGHLAND DRIVE WINKEL CONRAD A.720-0000-2020 21.11 10/22/2025 Refund Check 007134-000, 505 HIGHLAND DRIVE WINKEL CONRAD A.700-0000-2020 1.50 10/22/2025 Refund Check 007134-000, 505 HIGHLAND DRIVE WINKEL CONRAD A.701-0000-2020 28.19 10/22/2025 Refund Check 007134-000, 505 HIGHLAND DRIVE 71.99 10/22/2025 WINKEL CONRAD A. 71.99 WONG ALBERT 700-0000-2020 6.76 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103476-000, 2177 PAISLEY PATH WONG ALBERT 701-0000-2020 10.34 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103476-000, 2177 PAISLEY PATH WONG ALBERT 700-0000-2020 0.90 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103476-000, 2177 PAISLEY PATH WONG ALBERT 720-0000-2020 12.70 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103476-000, 2177 PAISLEY PATH 30.70 10/22/2025 WONG ALBERT 30.70 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 601-6140-4300 31,032.51 10/29/2025 County @ 75% WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 601-6040-4300 10,344.17 10/29/2025 City @ 25% 41,376.68 10/29/2025 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 41,376.68 XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 2,967.09 10/22/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 700-7043-4320 2,649.77 10/22/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 9,352.13 10/22/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1600-4320 21.58 10/22/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 100.05 10/22/2025 Electric Charges AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 30 of 31 74 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 15,090.62 10/22/2025 XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1600-4320 431.70 10/29/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1220-4320 1,020.92 10/29/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 99.84 10/29/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1170-4320 6,762.24 10/29/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1312-4320 798.75 10/29/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1540-4320 840.09 10/29/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 24,523.89 10/29/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1550-4320 -274.53 10/29/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 701-0000-4320 99.84 10/29/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1120-1193 64.60 10/29/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1190-4320 508.20 10/29/2025 Electric Charges 34,875.54 10/29/2025 XCEL ENERGY INC 49,966.16 Zillmer Tree Management LLC 601-6040-4300 4,165.50 10/29/2025 City @ 25% Zillmer Tree Management LLC 601-6060-4300 1,475.00 10/29/2025 PMP @ 59% Zillmer Tree Management LLC 701-6060-4300 200.00 10/29/2025 Sanitary @ 8% Zillmer Tree Management LLC 720-6060-4300 550.00 10/29/2025 Storm @ 22% Zillmer Tree Management LLC 700-6060-4300 275.00 10/29/2025 Water @ 11% Zillmer Tree Management LLC 601-6140-4300 12,496.50 10/29/2025 County @ 75% 19,162.00 10/29/2025 Zillmer Tree Management LLC 19,162.00 4,227,277.53 AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 31 of 31 75 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item 2025 Well Rehabilitation Project File No.ENG 25-11 Item No: D.7 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves a contract with Keys Well Drilling Company for the 2025 Well Rehabilitation project." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY The city typically rehabilitates one or more of its 12 public water supply wells annually. This project includes rehabilitation of Well Numbers 8 & 12. BACKGROUND Routine maintenance of a well is recommended every 8-10 years to keep it reliable and to reach its useful service life. Well #8 was constructed in 1999 and last rehabilitated in 2017. Well #11 was constructed in 2006 but has never been rehabilitated because it went dry in 2009. It was never formally abandoned. It is a fairly shallow well, comparatively speaking, and it was thought to have been drilled into an isolated and hydraulically unconnected portion of the aquifer. After 76 completing an aquifer recharge study, it was determined that it in fact, is connected to the larger aquifer system and just has very limited pumping capacity. The well has been used in recent years with good success, albeit being used sparingly. It makes sense to keep the well active, and therefore a rehabilitation effort makes sense at this time. DISCUSSION The City's standard construction contract is being utilized as the basis of the contract. BUDGET The consultant sent the project to four reputable well drillers, and three of them returned quotes as summarized below: Keys Bergerson Traut Well 8 $ 68,370.00 $ 81,690.00 $ 124,355.00 Well 11 $ 56,020.00 $ 66,031.00 $ 114,705.00 TOTAL $ 124,390.00 $ 147,721.00 $ 239,060.00 Annual well rehabilitation projects are included in the 5-yr Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) as project W-032. The budget for 2025 is $140,000. RECOMMENDATION Staff and the consultant recommend approving the well rehabilitation contract to Keys Well Drilling Company. ATTACHMENTS Award recommendation letter Wells 8 & 11 CIP W-032 Water Supply Overview Map Contractor Verification 77 barr.com P:\Mpls\23 MN\10\23101051 Chanhassen Well 8 and 11 Rehab\WorkFiles\Bidding\Received Bids\Award recommendation letter Wells 8 & 11_FINAL.docxAward recommendation letter Wells 8 & 11_FINAL.docx November 3, 2025 Charles Howley City of Chanhassen Public Works Director/City Engineer 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: City of Chanhassen Rehabilitation of Wells #8 and #11 Dear Mr. Howley: The purpose of this letter is to recommend award of the contract for the City of Chanhassen Well Rehabilitation Projects for Wells #8 and #11, City Project No. 25-11. The work performed under this contract will be standard maintenance and rehabilitation of City Wells #8 and #11. A request for quotes was sent to four contractors on October 15th, 2025: Traut Companies, Keys Well Drilling Company, Bergeson-Caswell Inc. and EH Renner & Sons Inc. Three quotes were received by the October 30th, 2025 deadline, including quotes from: Traut Companies, Bergeson-Caswell Inc., and Keys Well Drilling Company. A summary of the quotes is provided in the table below. Wells 8 & 11 Rehabilitation Quote Comparison Keys Well Drilling Company Bergeson-Caswell Inc. Traut Companies Well 8 Base bid $ 68,370.00 $ 81,690.00 $ 124,355.00 Well 11 Base bid $ 56,020.00 $ 66,031.00 $ 114,705.00 Total Base Bids $ 124,390.00 $ 147,721.00 $ 239,060.00 Barr Engineering recommends the Well Rehabilitation Project Wells #8 and #11 be awarded to Keys Well Drilling Company for a total contract of $124,390. Keys has performed well rehabilitation services for the city in the past and have performed satisfactorily. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to reach out. Sincerely, Brian LeMon, P.E. 78 Water - Annual Well Rehabilitation Overview Request Owner Charlie Howley, PW Director/City Engineer Department Water General Operations Form Type Capital Improvement Request Type Water, Sewer, and Surface Water Improvements Project Number W-032 Description This program annually inspects and performs regular maintenance of the City's wells. Wells are recommended to be serviced every 8 years.  The schedule of rehabilitation is: 2025 - Wells #8 & #11 2026 - Wells #7 & #13 2027 - Well #14 2028 - Well #9 2029 - Well #3 2030 - Well #4 2031 - Well #2 & #15 2032 - Well #10 2033 - Well #12 2034 - Wells #8 & #11 Performing regular maintenance will extend the life of well components, reduce emergency calls, and have a more reliable water supply system. Details Type of Project Improvement 79 Capital Cost Breakdown Capital Cost FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 Construction/Maintenance $140,000 $180,000 $95,000 $95,000 $100,000 $100,000 $239,000 $107,000 Total $140,000 $180,000 $95,000 $95,000 $100,000 $100,000 $239,000 $107,000 Capital Cost FY2025 Budget $140,000 Total Budget (all years) $1.409M Project Total $1.409M Capital Cost by Year Construction/Maintenance 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 $140,000.00 $180,000.00 $95,000.00 $95,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $239,000.00 $107,000.00 $192,000.00 $161,000.00 $0 $60K $120K $180K Capital Cost for Budgeted Years TOTAL $1,409,000.00 Construction/Maintenance (100%)$1,409,000 80 Funding Sources Breakdown Funding Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY20 Utility Fund - Water $140,000 $180,000 $95,000 $95,000 $100,000 $100,000 $239,000 $107,000 $192,000 $161,0 Total $140,000 $180,000 $95,000 $95,000 $100,000 $100,000 $239,000 $107,000 $192,000 $161,0 Funding Sources FY2025 Budget $140,000 Total Budget (all years) $1.409M Project Total $1.409M Funding Sources by Year Utility Fund - Water 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 $140,000.00 $180,000.00 $95,000.00 $95,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $239,000.00 $107,000.00 $192,000.00 $161,000.00 $0 $60K $120K $180K Funding Sources for Budgeted Years TOTAL $1,409,000.00 Utility Fund - Water (100%)$1,409,000.00 81 82 83 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item Approve Permanent Stormwater Ownership and Maintenance Agreement for Avienda Apartments File No.Item No: D.8 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Eric Maass, Community Development Director Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the attached Permanent Stormwater Ownership and Maintenance Agreement for Avienda Apartments with minor modifications as may be approved by the City Attorney." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY The attached stormwater agreement establishes ownership and maintenance responsibilities related to permanent stormwater facilities proposed to be constructed on Lot 1 Block 1 Avienda Apartments, which is the property where the apartment project will be constructed. This agreement does not pertain to the future Avienda regional stormwater pond. This is a standard agreement required of the city for long-term ownership and maintenance of private stormwater infrastructure. Final exhibits will be attached to this agreement prior to it being recorded against the property. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION 84 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Stormwater Maintenance Agreements Avienda Apartments 85 1 237658v3237658v2 STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/ BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE FACILITIES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the ______ day of _____________, 2025, by and between AVIENDA APARTMENTS OWNER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Owner”) and the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”). RECITALS A. The Owner is the owner of certain real property located in Carver County, Minnesota legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Avienda Apartments, Carver County, Minnesota (“Property”); and B. The Owner is proceeding to develop the Property; and C. The final plans for the Avienda Apartments final plat, (“Plans”), which are expressly made a part hereof, as approved or to be approved by the City, provides for detention/retention of stormwater within the confines of the Property; and D. The City and the Owner agree that the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, require that on-site stormwater management/BMP facilities be constructed and maintained on the Property; and E. The City requires that on-site stormwater management/BMP facilities (“Stormwater Facilities”) as shown on the Plans be constructed and adequately maintained by the Owner as a condition of final plat approval; and 86 2 237658v3237658v2 F. The Owner is required to enter into this Agreement as a condition of the Site Plan Agreement and grant to the City a license to enter the Property to inspect and, if necessary, complete work required under the terms of this Agreement. G. The parties acknowledge that the Owner intends to assign this Agreement to a homeowner’s association that will be formed to acquire the common elements, including but not limited to the Stormwater Facilities, and manage the common interest community. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants of the parties set forth herein and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Construction of Stormwater Improvements. Owner shall construct the Stormwater Facilities in accordance with the plans and specifications identified in the Plans or pursuant to any modification of the Plans approved by the City during construction of the Stormwater Facilities as provided in Exhibit A. The Owner shall submit to the City any updates with “as built” for the Stormwater Facilities within 1 year of installation. If Plan modification substantially changes the size, location, or operations and maintenance of the stormwater facility the owner shall provide updated Exhibits to the City. 2. Maintenance of Stormwater Improvements. A. The owner of the Stormwater Facilities from time-to-time, including but not limited to, Owner and its successors and assigns (collectively, but each only during their period of ownership, the “Responsible Party”) shall adequately maintain the Stormwater Facilities in accordance with the Stormwater Maintenance Plan and the City engineering standards for stormwater treatment facilities attached hereto as Exhibit B. This includes all pipes, channels, and other conveyances built to convey stormwater to the facility, as well as all structures, improvements, and vegetation provided to control the quantity and quality of the stormwater. Adequate maintenance is herein defined as good working condition so that these facilities are performing their design functions. B. The Owner will perform the work necessary to keep these Stormwater Facilities in good working order as appropriate. In the event a maintenance schedule for the Stormwater Facilities (including sediment removal) is outlined in Exhibit B, schedule will be followed and comply with all federal, state, and local regulations relating to the disposal of material. 3. Inspection and Reporting. The Responsible Party shall cause the Stormwater Facilities to be inspected and submit an inspection report annually and shall be responsible for the payment of any associated costs. The purpose of the inspection is to assure safe and proper functioning of the facilities. The inspection shall cover the entire facilities, berms, outlet structure, pond areas, access roads, buffers, etc. Deficiencies shall be noted in the inspection report. A storage treatment basin will be considered inadequate if it is not compliant with all requirements of the approved Plan and City engineering standards set forth in Exhibit B. 87 3 237658v3237658v2 4. Operator as Responsible Party. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the City acknowledges and agrees that the Owner’s maintenance, inspection, and reporting obligations with respect to the Stormwater Facilities may be delegated to the “Operator” under that certain Avienda Declaration of Reciprocal Easements and Operating Agreement dated as of December 29, 2022, and recorded in the Office of the Count y Recorder in and for Carver County, Minnesota on December 29, 2022 as Document No. A756037, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Avienda Declaration of Reciprocal Easements and Operating Agreement dated May 21, 2025, and recorded in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Carver County, Minnesota on May 22, 2025 as Document No. A786585, as further amended by that certain Second Amendment to Avienda Declaration of Reciprocal Easements and Operating Agreement dated September 4, 2025, and recorded in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Carver County, Minnesota on September 5, 2025 as Document No. A790584, and as further amended by that certain Third Amendment to Avienda Declaration of Reciprocal Easements and Operating Agreement dated October 24, 2025 and recorded in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Carver County, Minnesota on October 27, 2025 as Document No. A792655 (collectively, the “Declaration”), and that the Operator’s maintenance, inspection, and reporting of the Stormwater Facilities pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Declaration shall be deemed to discharge the Responsible Party’s maintenance, inspection, and reporting obligations with respect to the Stormwater Facilities hereunder provided that such maintenance, inspecting, and reporting by the Operator satisfies the maintenance, inspection, and reporting standards and requirements set forth herein. 5. City Access and Maintenance Rights. A. The Owner hereby grants permission to the City, its authorized agents and employees, to enter upon the Property and to inspect the stormwater management/BMP facilities whenever the City deems necessary. The City shall provide the Responsible Party, its successors and assigns, copies of the inspection findings and a directive to commence with the repairs if necessary (“Inspection Report”). B. In the event the Responsible Party, its successors and assigns, fails to maintain the Stormwater Facilities in good working condition acceptable to the City, and such failure continues for 60 days after the City gives the Responsible Party written notice of such failure, the City may enter upon the Property and take whatever steps necessary, including excavation and the storage of materials and equipment, to correct deficiencies identified in the Inspection Report. The City’s notice shall specifically state which maintenance tasks are to be performed. The City may charge the costs, including assessing the City’s costs to the Responsible Party’s property taxes, t o the Responsible Party. This provision shall not be construed to allow the City to erect any structure of permanent nature outside of the area of the Stormwater Facilities. It is expressly understood and agreed that the City is under no obligation to routinely maintain or repair said Stormwater Facilities, and in no event shall this Agreement be construed to impose any such obligation on the City. In addition, Responsible Party agrees that it is, and will be, solely responsible to address complaints and legal claims brought by any third party with regard to the maintenance and operation and the consequences there from the Stormwater Facilities. The Responsible Party shall defend and hold the City harmless from any such third-party claim, except to the extent of the City’s or its agents’, contractors’ or employees’ negligence or willful misconduct. 88 4 237658v3237658v2 6. Reimbursement of Costs. The Responsible Party shall reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City in the enforcement of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees. 7. Indemnification. This Agreement imposes no liability of any kind whatsoever on the City. The Responsible Party shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officials, employees, agents, contractors, and volunteers against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) arising out of or resulting from the Responsible Party or the Responsible Party’s agents’ or employee’s negligent or intentional acts, or any violation of any safety law, regulation or code in the performance of this Agreement, without regard to any inspection or review made or not made by the City, its officials, employees, agents, contractors, or volunteers, or failure by the City, its officials, employees, agents contractors, or volunteers to take any other prudent precautions. In the event the City, upon the failure of the Responsible Party to comply with any conditions of this Agreement, performs said conditions pursuant to its authority in this Agreement, the Responsible Party shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its employees, agents and representatives from any cost, damage or harm, except to the extent resulting from its or their own negligent acts in the performance of the Responsible Party’s required work under this Agreement. Failure to perform any of the Responsible Party’s required work shall not be considered negligence by the City, its employees, agents or representatives. 8. Notice. All notices required under this Agreement shall either be personally delivered or be sent by certified or registered mail and addressed as follows: To the Owner: Avienda Apartments Owner, LLC 7803 Glenroy Road, Suite 200 Bloomington, MN 55439 Attn: Legal Department To the City: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Attn: City Manager All notices given hereunder shall be deemed given when personally delivered or two business days after being placed in the mail properly addressed as provided herein. 9. Successors/Covenants Run with Property. All duties and obligations of Owner under this Agreement shall also be duties and obligations of Owner’s successors and assigns. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall run with the Property. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] [Signature pages (2) follow] 89 5 237658v3237658v2 PROPERTY OWNER: AVIENDA APARTMENTS OWNER, LLC a Delaware limited liability company By: Avienda Apartments Venture, LLC a Delaware limited liability company Its: Sole Member By: IDP Avienda, LLC a Minnesota limited liability company Its: Managing Member By: _________________________________ Print Name: Anne Behrendt Its: Authorized Signer STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of November, 2025, by Anne Behrendt, as Authorized Signer of IDP Avienda, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, as Managing Member of Avienda Apartments Venture, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as Sole Member of AVIENDA APARTMENTS OWNER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of the entity. Notary Public 90 6 237658v3237658v2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: Elise Ryan, Mayor (SEAL) And: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________, 2025, by Elise Ryan and by Lauire Hokkanen, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 AMP/amt 91 7 237658v3237658v2 EXHIBIT A TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT STORMWATER BMP EXHIBIT 92 8 237658v3237658v2 EXHIBIT B TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Stormwater Facility Operation and Maintenance Plan and Inspection Checklist The Owner, shall be vested with and shall be responsible for conducting an annual inspection of the stormwater facility as depicted in Exhibit B and attached hereto, utilizing the stormwater facility maintenance inspection checklist, attached hereto, and shall make any repairs to the stormwater facility necessary for its intended design and function, as determined by the City’s Water Resources Engineer for the remaining life of the Stormwater Facility. 93 9 237658v3237658v2 94 10 237658v3237658v2 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK & TRUST, a North Dakota banking corporation, which holds a mortgage executed by AVIENDA APARTMENTS OWNER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, mortgagee, in favor of FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK & TRUST, a North Dakota banking corporation, in the original principal amount of $85,000,000.00, dated October 24, 2025, filed October 27, 2025 with the Office of the County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota, as Document No. A792665, on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Stormwater Maintenance Agreement, agrees that the Stormwater Maintenance Agreement shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2025. FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK & TRUST By: _________________________ [print name] Its: ______________________ [title] STATE OF ) )ss. COUNTY OF __________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _________________ day of ______________________________, 2025, by __________________________________________ the ________________________________________ of FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK & TRUST, a North Dakota banking corporation, on behalf of said entity. __________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 651-452-5000 AMP/amt 95 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item Dogwood Right-of-Way Vacation File No.Vacation 25-01 Item No: D.9 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves tabling the Dogwood Road public Right-of-Way vacation item originally presented at the October 13, 2025 City Council meeting to an unspecified future City Council meeting once the applicable agreements between the property owners are completed." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY At the October 13, 2025 City Council meeting, the council tabled the item to November 10, 2025, but there are a number of additional surveying, easement, and property transfer steps still needed to align with the overall vacation process. The ask is to table indefinitely as the timing of completion is not determined and somewhat out of the city's control. Once all of the documents and agreements are in place, staff will bring the vacation request back to a future City Council meeting. BACKGROUND N/A DISCUSSION N/A 96 BUDGET The property owner requesting the vacation is providing a cash escrow to the city to cover the survey and legal expenses incurred by the city for the vacation. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends tabling the item. ATTACHMENTS 97 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item Partial Release of Planned Unit Development Agreement (951 W 78th Street) File No.Item No: D.10 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Eric Maass, Community Development Director Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the partial release of the Planned Unit Development Agreement for property located at 951 W 78th Street." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY At the time of the development of the Target store in downtown Chanhassen, a Planned Unit Development Agreement was established over those properties and the adjacent commercial sites including the property located at 951 W 78th Street. Since that time, the property has had a new PUD Zoning Ordinance adopted, so the resulting PUD Agreement functions solely to what we would today refer to as a "Development Contract." Since all requirements of the development have been completed, staff is recommending that the City Council authorize the partial release of the Planned Unit Development Agreement for the property at 951 W 78th Street. The property at 951 W 78th Street is the former location of the Chanhassen Brewery, and that property has since been listed for sale. This action is an effort towards cleaning up the title work associated with this property. The release of development agreements or development contracts following completion and acceptance of improvements by the city is considered typical; however, this is only completed upon request by a 98 private property owner. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the partial release of the planned unit development agreement as presented. ATTACHMENTS DOCS-#237673-v1-Partial Release of PUD 99 1 (reserved for recording information) PARTIAL RELEASE OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIAL RELEASE OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT granted this ______ day of ________________, 2025, by the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”). WHEREAS, the City and Dayton Hudson Corporation a Minnesota corporation, and B.C. “Jim” Burdick and Brigitte Burdick, husband and wife, entered into a Planned Unit Development Agreement, dated October 26, 1992 and recorded November 17, 1992 with the Office of the County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota as Document No. 142323 (“PUD”); and WHEREAS, the City has been requested to release and discharge the property legally described on Exhibit A (“Property”) from the PUD; WHEREAS, all requirements of the PUD have been met as to the Property and there is no longer a need to have the PUD recorded against the Property. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota: The Property is released and discharged from the PUD. ADOPTED this _____ day of _______________, 2025. [Remainder of the page is intentionally left blank. Signature page is to follow.] 100 2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN (Seal) By ____________________________________ Elise Ryan, Mayor By ____________________________________ Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ____________, 2025, by Elise Ryan and Laurie Hokkanen, respectively the Mayor and the City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ___________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON, Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 AMP/amt 101 3 EXHIBIT A Lot 1, Block 1, Chanhassen Retail Third Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. 102 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item Approve SCALE Hardware and Software Purchase with Computer Integrated Technologies (CIT) File No.Item No: D.11 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Rick Rice, IT Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the purchase of SCALE hardware and software from Computer Integrated Technologies." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY The proposed SCALE hardware and software solution consists of three physical network servers to be located at City Hall and a single physical network server to be located at Public Works for disaster recovery. These servers will host the SCALE Professional Essentials virtual hosting software. All hardware and software are warranted for five years. This is a hyper-converge solution whereby all storage is contained within the network servers, eliminating the need for an external storage array. The proposal includes professional services from CIT for hardware and software installation, including the migration of all existing virtual servers from the VMware to SCALE. Warranty support for both hardware and software is provided directly from SCALE or through CIT who is a SCALE partner. BACKGROUND The city switched from utilizing individual physical network servers to the VMWare virtual server 103 environment in 2007. This allowed for a more cost-effective and efficient method of hosting the city's file servers and system software applications. This system was expanded to include a disaster recovery system which is located at the Public Works facility. There are currently 25 active virtual servers running on the three VMware physical host servers. Physical storage for the VMware environment is hosted on a 40-terabyte storage area network server. Our VMware software and support licenses have been renewed annually. Physical servers and storage for the VMware environment are replaced every 5 years. The physical hardware had been planned for replacement this year. DISCUSSION Broadcom / VMware License Changes VMware was purchased by Broadcom in November 2023. Broadcom changed its software licensing models in 2024 and eliminated the vSphere Enterprise software version, which the city had been using for our production servers. This required upgrading to their Foundation license, which represented a 66% cost increase from $4,319.00 to $7,149.44. Broadcom brought back the vSphere Enterprise license model in 2025, but did not allow license downgrades. The renewal for the Foundation license in 2025 increased by another 75%, from $7,149.44 to $12,544. The city disaster recovery server located at Public Works runs VMware Standard perpetual license. Broadcom eliminated this version as an offering in July of this year. This license is up for renewal this month. We are currently waiting for our Broadcom reseller to see what options we have and the associated costs. Broadcom / VMware Support Changes Broadcom has also made changes to VMware software support. Direct software support is now only available for their Cloud Foundation customers. All other customers are required to go through Partner distributers which was reduced in number from 18,000 to 300. Our primary network support vendor is no longer on the partner list. BUDGET The city budgeted $9,568 for VMWare in 2025 and set aside $165,000 in fund balance at the end of 2024 for new City Hall hardware and software in connection with the move. This quote includes equipment plus a five-year license and software agreement. The total for the five-year license and software is $37,850 and this will be allocated over the five-year term of the agreement. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the purchase of the five-year SCALE Hardware, Software, and Implementation contract at a cost of $144,086.01. ATTACHMENTS SCALE Quote - CIT.pdf SCALE Quote - Scale Computing.pdf 104 SCALE Production Cluster and DR Node Date: 9/25/2025 Prepared For: City Of Chanhassen Commercial Attn Finance Dept Chanhassen, MN 55317 rrice@chanhassenmn.gov 952.227.1111 Prepared By: CIT N/A N/A N/A N/A https://www.citsolutions.net 105 Executive Summary Virtualization Infrastructure Migration to Scale Computing The City of Chanhassen is undertaking a strategic migration from its existing virtualization infrastructure to the Scale Computing HyperCore platform. This transition marks a signicant step toward modernizing IT operations, enhancing system resilience, and simplifying management. Project Overview The current virtualization environment, based on VMware and/or Hyper-V, has served the city well but presents increasing challenges in terms of cost, complexity, and scalability. To address these concerns, the city has selected Scale Computing, a hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) solution that integrates compute, storage, and virtualization into a single, easy-to-manage platform. Key Benets of Scale Computing Simplicity and Ease of Management Scale’s all-in-one architecture eliminates the need for separate storage networks and complex congurations. IT sta can manage the entire environment through a single, intuitive interface, reducing administrative overhead. Cost Eciency Unlike traditional virtualization platforms that often require separate licensing for hypervisors, management tools, and support, Scale Computing oers a consolidated pricing model with no additional hypervisor licensing fees. High Availability and Resilience Built-in redundancy and automated failover ensure continuous availability of critical services. The system is designed to self-heal and recover from hardware failures with minimal intervention. Scalability The platform allows for seamless scaling by simply adding nodes, with no disruption to existing workloads. This exibility supports future growth without the need for major infrastructure overhauls. Edge and Remote Site Optimization Scale Computing is particularly well-suited for distributed environments, oering robust performance in remote or branch locations with limited IT resources. Improved Performance and Reliability With direct integration between the hypervisor and storage layers, Scale reduces latency and improves overall system responsiveness. Conclusion Migrating to Scale Computing positions the City of Chanhassen for long-term success by reducing complexity, lowering costs, and improving the reliability of its IT infrastructure. This move supports the city’s commitment to delivering ecient, uninterrupted services to its residents and departments. Statement of Work 106 Kicko/Meeting Call Congure Scale Cluster (3 Nodes) Unbox and assemble hardware. Congure OOBM networking and licensing for each node. Congure switching VLANs and ports for LAN and BACKPLANE networks. Install hardware into rack and connect to power and networking. Establish node connectivity and congure BACKPLANE networking. Install latest Scale hardware and rmware updates on all nodes. Enable SNMP monitoring on nodes. Complete initial cluster setup and conguration. Congure DR Node Unbox and assemble hardware. Congure OOBM networking and licensing for each node. Congure switching VLANs and ports for LAN and BACKPLANE networks. Install hardware into rack and connect to power and networking. Establish node connectivity and congure BACKPLANE networking. Install latest Scale hardware and rmware updates on all nodes. Enable SNMP monitoring on nodes. Complete initial cluster setup and conguration. Congure replication between Scale clusters. Enable Fleet Manager on all clusters. Customer Considerations Vendor support-ability and compatibility with all applications should be veried with Scale Computing hypervisor before proceeding with application migrations. Sucient power, networking and switch capacity will be required for new cluster to be online at same time as current server environment to allow for successful migration of all workloads. Server Migration (Veeam) Congure Veeam Application for backups/replication. Install Scale Appliance module on Scale cluster. Install Hyper-V/ESXi module on legacy hardware (If required). Create Conversion to VM plan for migration to Scale. Allow VMs to properly backup to prepare for nal migration. Per VM Cutover Process (VM downtime required - after hours recommended): Shutdown legacy VM. Complete nal backup. Run convert to Scale VM process. Power on Scale VM and install Scale Tools (VM reboot required). Congure proper networking on VM. Conrm VM functionality and connectivity. Disable VM from temporary backup plans. Verify all virtual machines have been migrated to Scale and are functioning correctly. Virtual Machine Migration List: CAZAD 107 CFD1 CFS4 CFS5 ChanDC1 CHLSERV CIS1 COMMSERV CPS2 CPS4 CSEC2 CUS1 CUS4 CUS7 CVS2 LF-DMZ SDHISTORIAN SDSCADA SDWIN911 SQL1 Veeam Proxy1 Veeam Proxy3 CHANDC2 CPW2 Server Replication Enable DR replication for following servers: CHANDC1 CAZAD CFS5 CIS1 SQL1 CSEC2 SDHISTORIAN SDSCADA SDWIN911 LF-DMZ Decommission Legacy Hardware Verify all necessary services, functionality and data has been migrated from legacy hardware. Verify any legacy servers or VMs have been removed from backups. Shutdown legacy devices and disconnect from networking and power. Remove from network rack and stage for customer to recycle hardware. Post project QA checklist Project Management 108 CIT will assign a dedicated resource to serve as the Project Manager (“Project Manager”). The Project Manager will be responsible for overseeing the project, coordinating CIT resources, and serving as the primary point of contact for the Customer. Responsibilities will include. Managing project scope, including facilitating and documenting formal change requests. Developing and maintaining the project schedule. Leading regular status meetings with stakeholders, in accordance with the frequency agreed in the Project Plan. Maintaining live project status updates within the Customer Portal, where the Customer may view reports at any time. Performing additional project management activities as dened in this Statement of Work Facilitate a formal project closure, which may include a Project Closure meeting. CIT Change Orders CIT establishes change management procedures to initiate changes to the services identied in the SOW. A change typically occurs when either party encounters any of the following situations during service delivery: Either party identies new requirements not included in the original service’s scope Either party changes the direction and intent of this Service, which requires CIT to rework the services. Small Changes Changes less than 20% of the original scope will be managed informally with email verication by the PM. Large Changes Changes greater than 20% of the original scope will be managed with a formal approval process. Scale Production Cluster Build: Scale DR Node Build: 109 110 Proposal Summary SCALE Production Cluster and DR Node Quote information: Quote #3529585-1-A Prepared on: 9/25/2025 Expires: 10/25/2025 Account Executive: N/A | N/A | N/A https://www.citsolutions.net Prepared for: City Of Chanhassen Commercial Attn Finance Dept PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 Ship to: City Of Chanhassen Commercial Attn Finance Dept PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 One-time costs Optional Description Qty Unit Price Price Including Tax SCALE Production Cluster with Support $102,395.87 N HC3450DF CHASSISXEON SP CPU 10X NVME 1U 3 $24,115.00 $72,345.00 N Scale Computing Intel Xeon Gold (5th Gen) 5515+ Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor Upgrade - 22.50 MB L3 Cache - 64-bit Processing - 4.10 GHz Overclocking Speed - Socket LGA-4677 - 165 W - 16 Threads 6 $0.01 $0.06 N Scale Computing RAM Module - For Server - 16 GB - DDR5- 5600/PC5-44800 DDR5 SDRAM - 5600 MHz - Registered - 288- pin - DIMM 48 $0.01 $0.48 N NVME SSD 3.84TB 2.5 U.3 30 $0.01 $0.30 N INTEL X710-T4L4-PORT 10GBASE-T 3 $0.01 $0.03 N SC HYPERCORE 60 MONTH PROFESSIO ESSENTIALS SOFTWARE AND SUPPORT 1 $20,200.00 $20,200.00 N 5 YRSHW WARRANTY 1 $7,300.00 $7,300.00 N Scale Computing ScaleCare - Premium Install - Service - Technical - Electronic 1 $2,550.00 $2,550.00 DR Node $28,010.14 N HC3450F CHASSISXEON SP CPU 4X NVME 1U 1 $17,310.00 $17,310.00 N Scale Computing Intel Xeon Gold (5th Gen) 5515+ Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor Upgrade - 22.50 MB L3 Cache - 64-bit Processing - 4.10 GHz Overclocking Speed - Socket LGA-4677 - 165 W - 16 Threads 1 $0.01 $0.01 N Scale Computing RAM Module - For Server - 16 GB - DDR5- 5600/PC5-44800 DDR5 SDRAM - 5600 MHz - Registered - 288- pin - DIMM 8 $0.01 $0.08 N Scale Computing 7.68 TB Solid State Drive - 2.5" Internal - U.3 4 $0.01 $0.04 111 Subtotal:$144,086.01 Tax:$0.00 Total:$144,086.01 N INTEL X710-T4L4-PORT 10GBASE-T 1 $0.01 $0.01 N SC//HYPERCORE - 8C-PS 5 YEAR LICENSE AND SOFTWARE 1 $8,600.00 $8,600.00 N 5 YRSHW WARRANTY 1 $1,750.00 $1,750.00 N Scale Computing Node Installation Remote Support - Service - Technical - Electronic 1 $350.00 $350.00 CIT Services $13,680.00 N CIT Project Management 7 $128.00 $896.00 N CIT Services Engineer 32 $188.00 $6,016.00 N CIT Services Engineer (After Hours)24 $282.00 $6,768.00 Scale Promotional Items $0.00 N SC//HYPERCORE ADVANCED TRAINING 1 $0.00 $0.00 N WINDOWS/LINUX SERVERS ONLYPROMO SCALE COMPUTING MOVE 1 $0.00 $0.00 N MARKETNG DISC SOFTWARE SERVICES ADVANCED TRAINING QHAT 1 $0.00 $0.00 N PLATFORM 2026 REGISTRATION SC//PLATFORM ADVANCED TRAINING 1 $0.00 $0.00 Notes: Please note: Items marked with "Y" (Yes) in the optional column are not included in the subtotal, tax, or total calculations. 112 Acceptance and Incorporation by Reference This Proposal, together with the terms and conditions set forth in the Master Services Agreement, Service Attachments and all other agreements identified on Exhibit A (the agreements identied on Exhibit A are hereafter collectively referred to as the “Ancillary Agreements”) is between Computer Integration Technologies, a Minnesota corporation (sometimes referred to as “we,” “us,” “our,” or “Provider”), and the customer identied on the signature block at the end of this Proposal (sometimes referred to as “You,” Your,” or “Client”). Client and Provider expressly agree that the terms and conditions set forth in the Ancillary Agreements are hereby incorporated into this Proposal by reference as if fully set forth herein, regardless of whether Client separately executed any of the Ancillary Agreements.  Notwithstanding that certain provisions of the Ancillary Agreements may not facially appear applicable to every transaction or circumstance governed by this Proposal, each such provision shall be interpreted broadly and in context, and shall apply and control to the extent such provision can reasonably be construed to apply to the rights, obligations, or subject matter hereof. This Proposal shall be effective and shall automatically become a legally binding agreement as of the rst date upon which both Provider and Client have signed below (the “Effective Date”). Provider and Client are sometimes referred to separately as a “Party”, or  collectively as the ”Parties.”  Any capitalized terms in this Proposal not defined herein shall have the meaning provided in any Ancillary Agreement(s) dening such capitalized term.  If there is a direct conflict between this Proposal and any term or condition set forth in any of the Ancillary Agreements, the conicting term or condition in this Proposal shall control.  By signing or accepting this Proposal, Client acknowledges, represents, and warrants to Provider that Client has read and agrees to all terms and conditions set forth in the Ancillary Agreements on the Eective Date. The Parties agree that electronic signatures on this Proposal shall be relied upon and shall bind the Parties to the terms and conditions stated or incorporated by reference herein. Each Party hereby warrants and represents that such Party is authorized to execute this Proposal and perform the undertakings set forth or incorporated herein. This Proposal supersedes all prior negotiations, proposals, orders, agreements and communications between the Parties regarding all matters expressly addressed or within the reasonable scope of this Proposal or the Ancillary Agreements.  Client acknowledges and agrees that Provider may, from time to time, revise the terms and conditions of the Ancillary Agreements, provided that any such revision shall be eective only in accordance with applicable law, including prevailing legal standards for enforceable “clickwrap” or equivalent electronic consent mechanisms. Revised terms or conditions shall become binding and eective upon the earlier of: (a) Client’s continued use of the applicable products or services following reasonably conspicuous notice and opportunity for Client to review the revised term(s) or condition(s); or (b) Client’s armative acceptance of the revised term(s) via a click-through or similar method reasonably designed to conrm assent. Provider shall make revised terms reasonably available for Client review which shall indicate the date of last revision. If Client does not agree to any revised term(s), Client must discontinue use of the aected products or services and may terminate this Proposal only in accordance with termination provisions set forth in the Ancillary Agreements.  Any revision(s) to the terms or conditions of the Ancillary Agreements by Provider shall apply only prospectively, unless otherwise required by applicable law or expressly stated in the revised terms. Client further agrees that the terms of the Ancillary Agreements shall apply not only to the specic transaction described in this Proposal, but also to all other current and future transactions between Client and Provider unless and until such terms are superseded by a subsequently executed Proposal or Ancillary Agreement. Both of the Parties, acting through their respectively authorized officers, agents, or representatives hereby execute this Proposal with the intention of being bound hereby. 113 Exhibit A Click the buttons below to view the linked documents. Master Services Agreement Services Attachment for Managed Services Service Attachment for Access Control Services Service Attachment for Managed Video Surveillance Schedule of Services Data Processing Agreement Schedule of Third-Party Services IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Order Form is agreed to by the parties below and entered into as of the Order Eective Date. City Of Chanhassen Commercial Signature: Name: Date: 114 Quotation Scale Computing 525 S Meridian St Indianapolis, IN 46225 USA Phone: (877) 722-5359 Email: sales@scalecomputing.com Quote #:Q-94511-1 Date:9/23/2025 4:49 PM Expires On:12/31/2025 Scale ID:SC-2507-9373 End User City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 United States matt Kerr 9524069004 mkerr@chanhassenmn.gov Registered Partner:  Scale Computing Distributor:  Scale Computing Scale Computing Representative Phone Email Jacob Springer 812-682-7412 jspringer@scalecomputing.com Production PART #PRODUCT START END QTY MSRP/UNIT PRICE/UNIT TOTAL PRICE CHA-3-1F HC3450DF Chassis 3 $24,291.00 $24,291.00 $72,873.00 HCOS-5-PE SC//HyperCore 60 month Essential Kit Software and Support License Tier: Professional 8/7/2025 8/6/2030 1 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 CPU-3-23 Intel Xeon Gold 5515+6 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 RAM-3-16 16GB DDR5 RDIMM 48 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 NVM-3-1D 3.84TB 2.5" U.3 NVMe SSD 30 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 NIC-3-11 4-ports 25Gb SFP28 OCP 3 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Page 1 of 3 115 PART #PRODUCT START END QTY MSRP/UNIT PRICE/UNIT TOTAL PRICE HW-5 5 Year HW Support for Scale Computing HCI Appliance 8/7/2025 8/6/2030 1 $7,287.30 $7,287.30 $7,287.30 QADVON ScaleCare Quickstart Onsite Installation Services 1 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 Production Total Price:$108,160.30 Group2 PART #PRODUCT START END QTY MSRP/UNIT PRICE/UNIT TOTAL PRICE MPVRR VMware Rip & Replace Partner Promo 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ADTM-PROMO-20 PROMO Scale Computing Move powered by Carbonite Migrate 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 QHAT SC//HyperCore Advanced Training 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 PLTFRM-REG/ QHAT-2026 Admission to Scale Computing Platform 2026 Summit with SC//Platform Advanced Training Service Included 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 QMIG-10 Migration Service 10 Pack 4 $4,750.00 $4,750.00 $19,000.00 Group2 Total Price:$19,000.00 DR PART #PRODUCT START END QTY MSRP/UNIT PRICE/UNIT TOTAL PRICE CHA-3-1E HC3450F Chassis 1 $17,310.00 $17,310.00 $17,310.00 CPU-3-23 Intel Xeon Gold 5515+1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 RAM-3-16 16GB DDR5 RDIMM 8 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 NVM-3-1E 7.68TB 2.5" U.3 NVMe SSD 4 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 NIC-3-11 4-ports 25Gb SFP28 OCP 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 HCOS-S-5-8C-PS SC//HyperCore - 8 core 60 Month license and support software License Tier: Professional Support Level: ScaleCare 1/30/2026 1/29/2031 1 $9,563.00 $9,563.00 $9,563.00 Page 2 of 3 116 PART #PRODUCT START END QTY MSRP/UNIT PRICE/UNIT TOTAL PRICE HW-5 5 Year HW Support for Scale Computing HCI Appliance 1/30/2026 1/29/2031 1 $1,731.00 $1,731.00 $1,731.00 QADVON ScaleCare Quickstart Onsite Installation Services 1 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 DR Total Price:$34,604.00 Customer Total: USD 161,764.30 Order Lead Time Notice Although our standard lead time on build-to-order systems is 4 weeks, please be aware that lead times may be extended due to the availability of components at the time of your order. Once an order is placed, an anticipated ship date based on current knowledge of said availability will be issued. Further communication regarding order timeframes will be issued and ASD from that point forwards, if necessary. Order status can be tracked both through e-mail notifications and by accessing order details in the partner and customer portals. Terms & Conditions Order: End User shall submit written/electronic purchase orders (as specified by SCALE) to approved Reseller or Distributor for SCALE Products. By placing an order for SCALE software/hardware, End User agrees to be bound by the End User Software License Agreement and the ScaleCare Terms and Conditions – available at https://www.scalecomputing.com/eula and https:// www.scalecomputing.com/terms-of-support-and-maintenance. Shipping: SCALE will ship SCALE Products to the address specified on the purchase order. All SCALE Products shall be shipped F.O.B. Origin (SCALE’s shipping point). End User shall be responsible for shipping costs, shipping insurance costs, shipping taxes and shipping surcharges, if applicable. $60 per 1U node / $150 per 2U node will be invoiced for ground shipping in the US. Contact your SCALE Sales Manager for International shipping rates. Price: End User’s price for each unit will be determined based on SCALE’s list price at the time of order. End User is responsible for paying any and all applicable sales and/or use tax to their appropriate revenue agency unless taxes are billed directly by SCALE. Title: Title to hardware will pass to End User upon shipment of the SCALE Products in accordance with order terms above. Returns: All orders are considered final. No returns of sold SCALE Products will be accepted. Discounts offered by Scale Computing are one-time discounts, based on products and services offered in this quote. Discounts are only valid until the expiration date on this quote and will not be carried forward for future orders. Signature: Effective Date: ______/______/______ Name (Print): Title: Please sign and email to po@scalecomputing.com. THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS! Page 3 of 3 117 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item Resolution 2025-XX: Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County for the Mill Street Trail Improvement Project File No.ENG 24-04 Item No: D.12 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves a cooperative agreement with Hennepin County for the CSAH 82 (Mill Street) Trail Improvement Project." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Operational Excellence SUMMARY Hennepin County is planning to construct a new multi-use trail from Holly Lane in Chanhassen to downtown Excelsior in 2026. Since a portion of the project is located in Chanhassen, a cooperative agreement is required between the city and the county. Hennepin County is the lead agency for the project, even though the portion in Chanhassen is in Carver County. BACKGROUND The project page is available from Hennepin County: https://www.hennepin.us/millstreet. Residents can also subscribe to recieve email updates about the project from Hennepin County. DISCUSSION Upon completion of the project, the city will be responsible for future maintenance of the trail, which is 118 typical. BUDGET The city's cost share for the project is currently estimated at $52,819.56. The final amount will be determined after bidding and construction of the project. The project is currently at the 95% design level and is in final review. The funding will come from the Transportation Infrastructure Management (TIM) fund, which is where our annual trail maintenance work is funded from. This project has been planned as part of our 2026 Trail CIP. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approving the cooperative agreement with Hennepin County. ATTACHMENTS Resolution-JPA with Hennepin County-Mill St Trail Cooperative Agreement-Draft 119 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA DATE: November 10, 2025 RESOLUTION NO: 2025-XX____ MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ENTERING INTO A CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR THE HENNEPIN COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 82 (MILL STREET) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, Hennepin County and Chanhassen each has the authority to construct, maintain, repair, and improve public streets within their respective jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County State Aid Highway 82 (CSAH 82), also known as Mill Street, and Carver County State Aid Highway 17 (CSAH 17), also known as Powers Boulevard, are duly dedicated public streets, partially located within the corporate limits of Chanhassen; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to undertake a joint project involving safety improvements, grading, aggregate base, pavement surfacing, curb & gutter, sidewalk, multi-use trail, storm sewer, and other incidentals; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County is the lead agency for the project, including the areas located within Carver County; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County is responsible for all costs associated with the project design and construction except any additional items that may be requested specifically by the City that the County does not deem necessary to carry out the scope of the Project; and WHEREAS, the authority of the Parties to enter into a Construction Cooperative Agreement is provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to enter into a Construction Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County for the purposes of completing the improvements to Hennepin County CSAH 82 and Carver County CSAH 17. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 10th day of November 2025. ATTEST: Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 120 Agreement No. PW 23-55-25 County Project No. 2182300 County State Aid Highway 82 City of Chanhassen County of Hennepin 1 CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT This Agreement is made between the County of Hennepin, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the “County”, and the City of Chanhassen, a body politic and corporate, under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the “City.” The County and the City collectively are referred to as the “Parties.” Recitals The following Recitals are incorporated into this Agreement. 1. The County is leading a multimodal safety improvement project along County State Aid Highway State Aid Highway (CSAH) 82, a/k/a Mill St., from 2nd Street in Excelsior, Hennepin County, to approximately 400 feet south of the Hennepin and Carver County boundary line, along CSAH 17, a/k/a Powers Blvd., in Chanhassen, Carver County. Improvements include construction of a shared use path, ADA upgrades, and various other safety improvements as shown in County Project (CP) 2182300 and as further illustrated in the attached Exhibit B (Project Plan Title Sheet), all of which shall hereinafter be referred to as the “Project”. 2. The Parties have agreed to enter into this Agreement to memorialize the partnership and to outline each party’s ownership and financial responsibilities, maintenance responsibilities, and associated costs for the Project. 3. The Couty has been negotiating to enter into separate agreements with the Cities of Shorewood (PW 24-46-25) and Excelsior (PW 21-27-25) for cost and maintenance responsibilities as part of the Project. 4. The County has entered into a separate Joint Powers Agreement (PW 17-76-25) with Carver County to outline each Party’s ownership, maintenance responsibilities, and authority to acquire real property interests needed for the Project. 5. The County shall be the lead agency in Project designs, engineering, and construction administration, and be responsible for acquiring all necessary right of way and/or other governmental agencies-required permits needed for the Project. 6. The County Engineer has prepared an Engineer’s Estimate of quantities and unit prices for the above described Project, and a copy of the Engineer’s Estimate and an estimated Division of 121 Agreement No. PW 23-55-25 CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300 2 Cost Summary, marked Exhibit A, is attached hereto. 7. The Project will be carried out by the Parties under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 162.17, Subdivision 1, and Section 471.59. Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Term of Agreement, Survival of Terms, and Exhibits. Effective Date. This Agreement is effective as of the date of the final signature. Expiration Date. This Agreement will expire after the date in which all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled. Survival of Terms. Provisions that by their nature are intended to survive the term, cancellation or termination of this Agreement do survive such term, cancellation or termination. Such provisions include but are not limited to: Maintenance Responsibilities, Records/Audits, Indemnification, Insurance, Worker Compensation Claims, Cancellation, Termination, and Minnesota Laws Govern. Exhibits. All exhibits are attached and incorporated into this Agreement. 1.4.1 Exhibit A (Division of Cost Summary) 1.4.2 Exhibit B (Project Plan Title Sheet) 2. Project Construction. Contract Award and Administration. The County or its agents shall prepare the necessary plans, specifications, and proposal; obtain approval of the plans and specifications from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) and the City; advertise for bids for the work and construction; receive and open bids pursuant to the advertisement; enter into a contract with the successful bidder at the unit prices specified in the bid of such bidder; administer the contract; and perform the required engineering and inspection; all in accordance with the plans and specifications set forth below. Plans and Specifications. 2.2.1 Design Work. All design work performed by the County and its agents that is to be incorporated into the bidding documents for the Project shall be prepared 122 Agreement No. PW 23-55-25 CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300 3 and certified by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. All designs which affect County facilities shall conform to MnDOT Design Standards applicable to County State Aid Highways and to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards, and be approved by the County Engineer. All designs which affect City facilities shall conform to the City’s Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. 2.2.2 Plan Numbers (S.A.P.#/S.P.# and S.G.#). The plans and specifications are referenced and identified as S.A.P #027-682-003 and SG-25-M-AT-07 and shall be approved by MnDOT and the Metropolitan Council before Project construction. The City’s project number is 24-04. 2.2.3 Request for Copies of Plans. At the request of the City, the County or its agents shall furnish the City with any working copies of any plans, designs or reports at any time during the Project design process. Construction Supervision and Inspection. The County or its agents will administer the construction contract, and perform all necessary engineering, inspection and testing of all the contract work. All work for the Project shall be completed in compliance with the MnDOT and City approved plans and specifications. The City Engineer or a designated representative shall have the right, as the work progresses, to enter upon the job site to make any inspections deemed necessary and shall cooperate with the County Engineer and staff at their request to the extent necessary but will have no responsibility for the supervision of the work. Plan Changes and Additional Construction. 2.4.1 Plan Changes. The City agrees that the County may make changes in the plans or in the character of the contract construction that are reasonably necessary to cause the construction to be in all things performed and completed in a satisfactory manner. It is further agreed by the City that the County may enter into any change orders or supplemental agreements with the County’s contractor for the performance of any additional construction or construction occasioned by any necessary, advantageous or desirable changes in plans, within the original scope of the Project. 2.4.2 Review Proposed Changes. The City shall have the right to review any proposed changes to the plans and specifications as they relate to the City's cost participation prior to the work being performed, except in emergencies, and in those instances where the proposed changes necessitate a re-engineering of the design and/or specifications, the County shall submit the re-engineered design and/or specifications to the City. The City Engineer or designated representative shall respond to the County’s request for approval to authorize the issuance of any negotiated change orders or supplemental agreements prepared by the County that affect the City's share of the construction cost within a reasonable time frame. Right of Way/Permit. 123 Agreement No. PW 23-55-25 CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300 4 2.5.1 Right of Way Acquisition. The County or its agents shall acquire all additional right of way, permits and/or easements required for the construction of the Project. 2.5.2 Access Rights and Permits. To the extent permitted by law, the City shall transfer, convey, permit, or otherwise allow the use of property rights controlled or maintained by the City, including but not limited to easements or access rights, that may be required by the County for the Project. The Parties understand that any such access rights shall be subject to the City Council approval and will be granted at no cost to the County. Any and all permits required by the City for the Project shall be granted at no cost or expense to the County or its contractors. These permits include but are not limited to the following: obstruction permits, after hours work permits, and permits related to City water and sanitary infrastructure. The County shall also obtain, and comply with, any and all permits and approvals required from other governmental or regulatory agencies to accomplish the Project. 2.5.3 Right of Way Cost. The City shall participate in the right of way cost for the Project as provided herein. The Parties understand and agree that the City’s share of the Project right of way cost is fifty percent (50%) of the total Project right of way cost (“City’s Right of Way Cost”). As further described in Exhibit A, the City’s Right of Way Cost is currently estimated to be $30,845.00 which shall be paid to the County as a part of the City’s total cost participation in the Project. Asbestos. The Project may include the removal of asbestos containing electrical conduit. Only firms licensed to conduct asbestos abatement shall be used for the safe removal of asbestos containing electrical conduit with proper shipping manifest prepared and submitted to appropriate agency. The lead agency in the Project construction shall be responsible for the oversight of the removal of asbestos containing electrical conduit and compliance with the abovementioned specifications. Detours. The Project may require limited detouring of traffic onto the City’s streets. The Parties agree that there will be no compensation to the City for detours onto its streets required to construct the Project. 3. Cost Participation. In addition to the City’s Right of Way Cost for the Project as stated in Subsection 2.5.3, the City shall participate in the Project contract construction costs (“Contract Construction Costs”), associated design engineering fees (“Design Engineering Costs”), and Project construction administration fees (“Construction Engineering Costs”), collectively (“City’s Cost Participation”) as provided herein. Contract Construction Costs and Exhibit A Unit Prices. The City’s Cost Participation shall include the Contract Construction Costs for the Project as set forth in the estimated Division of Cost Summary shown in Exhibit A. It is recognized by the parties that $1,000,000.00 in Active Transportation funds have been awarded for the project by the Metropolitan Council’s Transportation Advisory Board. It is 124 Agreement No. PW 23-55-25 CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300 5 understood by the parties that the $1,000,000.00 in Active Transportation funds will be allocated in such a manner to first reduce the City’s share of the Contract Construction Costs. In the event that Active Transportation Funds are not fully allocated, the remainder of Active Transportation funds are allowed to reduce the County’s share of the Contract Construction Costs. For informational purposes only, the City’s share in Contract Construction Costs is currently estimated to be $68,671.00. The respective proportionate shares of the pro-rata pay items included in Exhibit A shall remain unchanged throughout the life of this Agreement. The Parties each understand and agree that the amount shown in Exhibit A is an estimate of the Contract Construction Costs on the Project and the unit prices set forth in the contract with the successful bidder and the final quantities as measured by the County Engineer's designated representatives shall govern in computing and apportioning the Parties’ total final Contract Construction Costs for the Project. The final quantities as measured by the County Engineer's designated representatives for contract pay items in which the City is participating shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Design Engineering and Construction Engineering Costs. The City’s Cost Participation shall also include reimbursement to the County for the City’s proportionate share of the Design Engineering Costs and Construction Engineering Costs for the Project. The City’s share of the Design Engineering Costs shall be equal to twelve percent (12%) of the total final amount of the City’s share of the Contract Construction Costs for the Project. For informational purposes only, the City’s share in Design Engineering Costs is currently estimated to be $8,241.00. The City’s share of the Construction Engineering Costs shall be equal to ten percent (10%) of the total final amount of the City’s share of the Contract Construction Costs for the Project as specified in Subsection 3.1 above. For informational purposes only, the City’s share in Construction Engineering Costs is currently estimated to be $6,867.00. The Parties understand and agree that the City’s proportionate shares of the Design Engineering and Construction Engineering Costs as listed in Exhibit A are estimated, and the City’s actual proportionate shares will be computed using the total final amount of the City’s share of the Contract Construction Costs for the Project. 4. Payment. Amount Due. The City agrees to pay the City’s Cost Participation amount as described herein. When to Invoice. After an award by the County to the successful bidder on the Project, the County shall invoice the City for ninety five percent (95%) of the City’s Cost Participation for the Project. The City’s Cost Participation shall be based on actual contract unit prices applied to the estimated quantities shown in the plans. Pay to the Order of. Payments shall be made to the County, in the name of the Hennepin County Treasurer, by the City for the full amount due stated on the invoices within forty five (45) days of the invoice date. 125 Agreement No. PW 23-55-25 CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300 6 Where to Send Payment. The payment should include the date, the name of the County’s project manager (Mr. Jay Hill, P.E.), project name and county project number (C.P. 2182300). Payment and supporting documentation should be mailed to the following address: Hennepin County Accounts Receivable Mail Code 131 300 South 6th St Minneapolis, MN 55487 Supplemental Agreement or Change Order. In the event the County Engineer or the County's staff determines the need to amend the construction contract with a supplemental agreement or change order which results in an increase in the contract amount for the Project, the City hereby agrees to remit within forty five (45) days of notification by the County of the change an amount equal to ninety five percent (95%) of the estimated City’s shares as documented in the supplemental agreement or change order. Final Amount Due. The remainder of the City’s shares in the engineering and contract construction costs of the Project, including additional costs resulting from supplemental agreements and change orders, will be due the County upon acceptance by the County’s construction engineer of all the construction work performed by the County’s construction contractor and submittal of the County Engineer's final estimate for the Project to the City. Remaining Balance. Upon final payment to the Project contractor by the County, any amount remaining as a balance in the deposit account will be returned to the City, within 45 days, on a proportionate basis based on the City’s initial deposit amount and the City’s final proportionate share of the Project costs. Likewise, any amount due the County from the City upon final payment by the County shall be paid by the City as its final payment for the construction and engineering costs of the Project within forty five (45) days of receipt of an invoice from the County. 5. The City’s Maintenance Responsibilities. Upon completion of the Project, the City shall provide year-round maintenance at its sole cost as outlined below. Roadways. The City will not be responsible for roadway maintenance of CSAH 17 (Powers Blvd). Sidewalks, Pedestrian Ramps, and Off-street Shared-use Paths/Trails. The City shall own and maintain sidewalks, pedestrian ramps, and off-street shared-use paths/trails located within Chanhassen’s municipal boundary constructed as part of the Project according to City practices at no cost to the County. Maintenance includes but is not limited to repairing faulted or broken panels or surfaces, vegetation control, and snow and ice removal. 126 Agreement No. PW 23-55-25 CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300 7 Storm Sewers. Storm sewers shall not be maintained by the City. See Carver County Agreement (PW 17-76-25) for storm sewer maintenance. 6. The County’s Maintenance Responsibilities. Hennepin County will not be responsible for any maintenance activities within Carver County/Chanhassen. 7. Authorized Representatives. In order to coordinate the services of the County with the activities of the City and vice versa so as to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement, the Hennepin County Highway Engineer or designated representative and the City Engineer or designated representatives shall manage this Agreement on behalf of the County and the City. County of Hennepin: Carla Stueve County Highway Engineer Hennepin County Public Works 1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN 55340 Office: 612-596-0356 Carla.Stueve@hennepin.us City of Chanhassen: Charles Howley Public Works Director/City Engineer 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Office: 952-227-1169 Email: chowley@chanhassenmn.gov 8. Assignment, Amendments, Default, Waiver, Agreement Complete, Cancellation or Termination. Assignment. The City shall not assign, subcontract, transfer or pledge this Agreement and/or the services to be performed hereunder, whether in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the County. Amendments. Any alterations, variations, modifications or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement and signed by the Parties hereto. Default. If the City fails to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement or so fails to administer the work as to endanger the performance of the Agreement, this shall constitute a default. Unless the City's default is excused by the County, the County may upon written notice immediately cancel this Agreement in its entirety. Waiver. The County's failure to insist upon strict performance of any provision or to 127 Agreement No. PW 23-55-25 CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300 8 exercise any right under this Agreement shall not be deemed a relinquishment or waiver of the same, unless consented to in writing. Such consent shall not constitute a general waiver or relinquishment throughout the entire term of the Agreement. Agreement Complete. The entire Agreement between the Parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this Agreement are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement. Cancellation or Termination. This Agreement may be terminated or cancelled by each party by mutual agreement with or without cause by either party upon thirty (30) day written notice. This Agreement shall be terminated or cancelled by any party upon a material breach by the other party. In the event of a termination or cancellation, the Parties will remain responsible for cost participation as provided in this Agreement for obligations incurred up through the effective date of the termination or cancellation, subject to any equitable adjustment that may be required to account for the effects of a breach. 9. Indemnification. The City Indemnifies the County. The City agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers, and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs or expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of the City or the City’s consultant or sub consultant, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable in the performance of the services required by this Agreement, and against all loss by reason of the failure of the City to perform fully, in any respect, all obligations under this Agreement. The City’s liability shall be governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 or other applicable law. The County Indemnifies the City. The County agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers, and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs or expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of the County or the County’s consultant or sub consultant, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable in the performance of the services required by this Agreement, and against all loss by reason of the failure of the County to perform fully, in any respect, all obligations under this Agreement. The County’s liability shall be governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 or other applicable law. 10. Insurance. Each party warrants that it has a purchased insurance or a self-insurance program sufficient to meet its liability obligations and, at a minimum, to meet the maximum liability limits of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466. This provision shall not be construed as a waiver of any immunity from liability under Chapter 466 or any other applicable law. 11. Worker Compensation Claims. 128 Agreement No. PW 23-55-25 CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300 9 City’s Employees. Any and all employees of the City and all other persons engaged by the City in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the City shall not be considered employees of the County, and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workers' Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of the employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of the employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the County. County’s Employees. Any and all employees of the County and all other persons engaged by the County in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the County shall not be considered employees of the City, and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workers' Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of the employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of the employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the City. 12. Records/Audits. The City agrees that the County, the State Auditor or any of their duly authorized representatives at any time during normal business hours, and as often as they may reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt and transcribe any books, documents, papers, records, etc., which are pertinent to the Project and the accounting practices and procedures of the City which involve transactions relating to this Agreement. 13. Nondiscrimination. The provisions of Minnesota Statute Section 181.59 and of any applicable local ordinance relating to civil rights and discrimination and the Affirmative Action Policy statement of Hennepin County shall be considered a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. 14. Counterparts/Electronic Signatures. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original copy of this Agreement and all of which, when taken together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement. The facsimile, email or other electronically delivered signatures of the Parties shall be deemed to constitute original signatures, and facsimile or electronic copies hereof shall be deemed to constitute duplicate originals. 15. Minnesota Laws Govern. The laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all questions and interpretations concerning the validity and construction of this Agreement and the legal relations between the Parties and their performance. The appropriate venue and jurisdiction for any litigation will be those courts located within the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. Litigation, however, in the federal courts involving the Parties will be in the appropriate federal court within the State of Minnesota. (This space left intentionally blank) 129 Agreement No. PW 23-55-25 CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300 10 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers and agree to be bound by the provisions herein set forth. CITY OF CHANHASSEN By:_______________________________ Mayor Date:______________________________ And: ______________________________ City Manager Date:______________________________ COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ATTEST: By: By: __________________________________ Deputy/Clerk of the County Board Chair of its County Board Date: Date: ________________________________ And: ________________________________ County Administrator Date: ________________________________ REVIEWED BY THE COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE: And:_________________________________ Assistant County Administrator, Public Works By: Date:________________________________ Assistant County Attorney Date: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL REVIEWED: By:_________________________________ By: County Highway Engineer County Administrative Clerk Date:________________________________ Date: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL By:_________________________________ Department Director, Transportation Operations Date:________________________________ 130 Agreement No. PW 23-55-25 CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300 11 EXHIBIT A Engineer’s Estimate and Division of Cost Summary 131 Agreement No. PW 23-55-25 CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300 12 EXHIBIT B Project Plan Title Sheet 132 Agreement No. PW 23-55-25 CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300 13 133 Agreement No. PW 23-55-25 CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300 14 134 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item Resolution 2025-XX: Call Public Improvement Hearing for the 2026 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 26-01 File No.ENG Project No. 26-01 CIP No. ST-012 Item No: D.13 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer Reviewed By Charlie Howley SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution calling for a Public Hearing regarding the improvements for the 2026 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 26-01 to be held on November 24, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY Consider calling for a Public Hearing regarding the feasibility of the proposed improvements to be held at the City Council meeting on November 24, 2025. BACKGROUND As part of the overall Pavement Management Program (PMP), the city annually plans to rehabilitate a section or sections of public streets across the city. The five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) identifies the near-term streets to be rehabilitated. The 2026 project includes approximately 2.2 miles of streets for rehabilitation via mill and overlay, full-depth reclamation, and/or total reconstruction. Key dates and items relative to the project: 135 On June 13, 2025, the Engineering Department released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for design and construction services for the 26-01 project. On June 20, 2025, the Engineering Department released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for geotechnical services for the 26-01 project. On July 14, 2025, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with Houston Engineering, Inc. for design and construction services for the project. On July 14, 2025, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with Braun Intertec for geotechnical exploration and engineering services in association with the 26-01 design contract. On November 19, 2025, the Engineering Department will host an Open House meeting with the impacted properties to discuss the project and respond to questions. The project webpage is: https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/government/projects/street-projects/2026-city-pavement-rehabilitation- project DISCUSSION Staff utilized the City's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project limits as shown in the attached 5-year CIP map representing the years 2025 through 2029. The Vasserman neighborhood (mill & overlay) and the Fox Hollow (full reconstruction) were on the CIP. Both neighborhoods have not received major rehabilitation since the original street construction. Only minor maintenance activities such as pothole patching, crack sealing, and sealcoating have been performed in these areas. Schedule Task Date Public Open House/Neighborhood Meeting #1 November 19, 2025 Accept Feasibility Study, Conduct Public (Improvement) Hearing, and Order Project November 24, 2025 Approve Plans and Specifications. Authorize Advertisement for Bids January 12, 2026 Bid Opening February 10, 2026 Call for Public (Assessment) Hearing February 23, 2026 Public Open House/Neighborhood Meeting #2 February 25, 2026 Conduct Public (Assessment) Hearing, Accept Bids, Adopt Assessment Roll, and Award Construction Contract March 9, 2026 Begin Construction May 2026 Substantial Completion Early November 2026 Final Completion June 2027 BUDGET 136 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council call for a Public Hearing regarding the improvements for City Project Number 26-01 to be held during the Council meeting on November 24, 2025, to facilitate receiving public input regarding the feasibility of the project. ATTACHMENTS Resolution - Call Improvement PH for 26-01 5-Year Street Rehabilitation CIP Map 2025-2029 137 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: November 10, 2025 RESOLUTION NO: 2025-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE 2026 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT NO. 26-01 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted July 14, 2025, a feasibility report is currently being prepared by Houston Engineering, Inc. with reference to the above-referenced project, and this report will be received by the Council on November 24, 2025, and WHEREAS, the feasibility report will provide information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council: 1. The Council will receive and accept the feasibility study on November 10, 2025, and consider the improvements of such project in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting properties for a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. 2. A public hearing for the proposed improvements within the 2026 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 26-01 shall be held on November 24, 2025, in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 7:00 PM. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 10th day of November 2025. ATTEST: Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 138 ########################################################################################################################################################################M M M M M Lake Virginia Christmas Lake Lotus Lake Brendan Pond Lake Harrison Kerber Pond Lake Susan Rice Marsh Lake Lake Riley Rice Lake Lake St. Joe Lake Minnewashta Lake Ann Lake Lucy ST18 ST14 ST15 ST17 ST61 Minnewashta Regional Park North Lotus Lake Park Meadow Green Park Lake Ann Park Chanhassen Pond Park Chanhassen Nature Preserve Chanhassen Recreation Center Lake Susan Park Rice Marsh Lake Preserve Power Hill Park Fox Woods Preserve Bandimere Community Park Bluff Creek Golf Course Hesse Farm Park Preserve Lake Susan Preserve City Center Park Raguet Wildlife Management Are MN Valley National Wildlife Re MN Landscape Arboretum Seminary Fen Scientific & Nat* Bluff Creek Preserve Independent School District 11 Independent School District 112 Independent School District 276 Riley Ridge Park Lake Ann Park Preserve SA7 SA101 SA5 SA5 SA41 )212 PowersBlvdLyman Blvd ChanhassenRdA r b o r e t u m Blvd Pioneer Trl A r boretum Blvd GalpinBlvdH w y212Hwy 212Hazeltine BlvdMa r k etBl v dPowers BlvdHwy 7AudubonRdF ly in g C lo u d D r Great Plains BlvdC o R d 1 0 1 ST101 ST101 Date Created: 10/23/2024 Document Path: K:\Departments\Engineering\CIP\2025-2029\CIP_5Year_2025-2029.aprxCreated By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department µ0 3,000 Feet 0 0.5 Mile 5-Year CIP Pavement Management Plan (PMP) - Streets (2025-2029) City of Chanhassen Legend 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Mill & Overlay Full Depth Reclamation ##Reconstruction M Municipal State Aid 139 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item Resolution 2025-XX: Accept Feasibility Study, Conduct Public Improvement Hearing, and Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the 2026 Great Plains Blvd/Lake Dr East Rehabilitation Project No. 26-02 File No.ENG Project No. 26-02 CIP No. ST-012 Item No: G.1 Agenda Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer Reviewed By Charlie Howley SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution accepting the feasibility study, ordering the improvements, and authorizing preparation of plans and specifications for the 2026 Great Plains Blvd/Lake Dr East Rehabilitation Project No. 26-02." Motion Type 4/5 Vote Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY Accept the feasibility study and host the first public hearing for the project, known as the 'Improvement Hearing,' associated with the M.S. 429 special assessment process in order to review the findings of the feasibility study and discuss specific aspects of the project. Follow up the public hearing portion of the agenda item with a decision regarding ordering production of plans and specifications for the project. BACKGROUND As part of the overall Pavement Management Program (PMP), the city annually plans to rehabilitate a section or sections of public streets across the city. The Five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) identifies the near-term streets to be rehabilitated. This 2026 project includes approximately 0.5 mile of 140 city state-aid streets for rehabilitation. Key dates and items relative to the project: On May 16, 2025, the Engineering Department released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for design and construction services for the 26-02 project. On June 20, 2025, the Engineering Department released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for geotechnical services for the 26-02 project. On June 23, 2025, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with I&S Group, Inc. (ISG) for design and construction services for the project. On July 14, 2025, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with Braun Intertec for geotechnical exploration and engineering services in association with the 25-01 design contract. On October 27, 2025, the City Council called for a Public Hearing to be held regarding the proposed improvements on November 10, 2025. On October 30, 2025, the Engineering Department hosted a public Open House meeting at City Hall to discuss the project and respond to questions with the impacted properties. Project information is available on the city's website at: https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/government/projects/street-projects/great-plains-lake-drive-east- rehabilitation-project To subscribe to the city's distribution list in order to receive routine project updates - interested residents and property owners should visit the following link to sign up: https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/i-want-to/subscribe. (There are 462 subscribers as of November 4, 2025.) DISCUSSION Staff utilized the City's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project limits as shown in the attached 5-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) map representing the years 2025 through 2029. This section of Lake Dr E was originally constructed between 1983 and 1987. It was last seal-coated in 2012. Portions of the concrete curbing and sidewalk along the Lake Dr E corridor has not held up well and is in poor condition. A higher percentage of concrete related repairs are warranted in comparison to other full depth reclamation (FDR) projects the city has recently completed. Great Plains Blvd was originally constructed in 1973, last reconstructed in 1991, and last rehabilitated in 2001. It was seal- coated in 2013. ISG was provided the city's asset management and geotechnical information relative to this project to factor into the feasibility analysis to incorporate with the subsequent design. Based on the existing maintenance and rating history, on-site street observations, and the feasibility analysis; Lake Dr E is expected to be rehabilitated via FDR but Great Plains can be rehabilitated via mill & overlay (M&O). A major component of this project is to evaluate the intersection of Great Plains Blvd and Lake Dr E. 141 This intersection currently is a two-way stop controlled intersection with the Great Plains legs being uncontrolled. ISG performed an intersection control evaluation and recommends one of two alternatives to improve the intersection from an operations perspective. The first, and less costly, alternative is to switch the intersection to a four-way stop controlled intersection. The second is to install a mini- roundabout. The mini-roundabout would provide the best overall level of service but at an estimated additional cost of $380,000. As with any street project area which includes rehabilitation there will be spot repair of curb and gutter. This project in particular will include long segments of curb replacement along Lake Dr E. Sidewalk scoping will include diamond grinding misaligned joints that have heaved primarily due to freeze-thaw and replacement of significantly damaged sidewalk panels. Existing pedestrian ramps impacted by the project will be brought into ADA compliance in accordance with the city's ADA transition plan. Pedestrian crosswalk areas will also be checked for conformance with the City's Crosswalk Policy. City public works staff performed a condition assessment on the existing utilities within the project areas. There weren't any significant improvements scoped in relation to the sanitary sewer and watermain networks. The sanitary and storm sewer pipe networks were televised, and the existing structures were evaluated to assess the need for improvements. An "Open House" style meeting was hosted on Thursday, October 30, at City Hall. A summary of the discussions held and feedback received will be incorporated into the presentation at the City Council meeting on November 10. Twenty-seven residents interested in the project attended the open house. Generally the common theme from the meeting was the residents believe there is a need for the project and they were supportive of the project. The vast majority of the residents were from the Marsh Dr/Hidden Ct neighborhoods to the south. Their main concerns was related to assessments and they were happy to learn they would not be assessed with this project. The Great Plains/Lake Dr E intersection was the second most discussed topic. After a detailed discussion took place relative to this intersection the majority of these participants indicated a preference towards installation of a mini- roundabout. The other primary discussion topic was related to pedestrian safety. Only a couple resident surveys have been received to date but they are also generally supportive of the project. Schedule Task Date Approve Plans and Specifications. Authorize Advertisement for Bids January 12, 2026 Bid Opening February 4, 2026 Call for Public (Assessment) Hearing February 9, 2026 Public Open House/Neighborhood Meeting #2 February 11, 2026 Conduct Public (Assessment) Hearing, Accept Bids, Adopt Assessment Roll, and Award Construction Contract February 23, 2026 Begin Construction May 2026 Substantial Completion October 2026 Final Completion June 2027 142 BUDGET This project is included in the 5-year CIP. Funding for the project is proposed to come from the Pavement Management Program (PMP) fund, which includes special assessments to benefiting properties as part of the revenue source. The special assessments will be managed per the City’s Assessment Policy. The Utility Enterprise funds will be utilized to cover the rehabilitation needs specific to each utility. The overall 26-02 project budget approved with the 2025-29 CIP was $950,000 but has been updated in the 2026-30 CIP to $1,400,000. The feasibility study prepared by ISG estimates the cost of the proposed improvements. The table below indicates the estimated cost in comparison to the project budget. Fund Project Budget Estimate (All-Way Stop) Estimate (Mini- Roundabout) PMP (Street)$1,380,000 $1,210,000 $1,592,000 Surface Water (Storm Sewer)$10,000 $57,000 $57,000 Sanitary Sewer $5,000 $17,000 $17,000 Watermain $5,000 $23,000 $23,000 Total $1,400,000 $1,307,000 $1,689,000 The estimated costs include a 10% contingency along with soft (non-construction) costs such as engineering, geotechnical, and testing. The project with the roundabout intersection would be over budget. The preliminary special assessment amounts distributed to the commercial properties along the corridor are indicated in the attached feasibility study. There are not any single-family properties within the project area which will be assessed. Hence, the flat fee portion of the Assessment Policy is not applicable to this project. RECOMMENDATION From an engineering and financing perspective this project is necessary, feasible and cost effective. Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution accepting the feasibility study, ordering the improvements, and authorizing production of plans and specifications for the City Project Number 26- 02. ATTACHMENTS Resolution - Accept Feasibility Study - Conduct PH - Order P&S for 26-02 26-02 Pavement Rehab Feasibility Report CIP Sheet 2026 Streets 5-Year CIP Map - 2025-2029 143 Assessment Policy 2025 Update 144 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: November 10, 2025 RESOLUTION NO: 2025-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION FOR ACCEPTING THE FEASIBILITY STUDY, CONDUCTING A PUBLIC HEARING, AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 2026 LAKE DRIVE EAST REHABILITATION PROJECT NO. 26-02 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted June 23, 2025, a feasibility report has been prepared by ISG with reference to the above-referenced project, and this report is being received by the Council on November 10, 2025, and WHEREAS, the feasibility report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels. WHEREAS, on October 27, 2025, the City Council called for the public hearing to be held on November 10, 2025, for the 2026 Lake Drive East Rehabilitation Project No. 26-02. The project includes street, drainage, and utility system improvements along Great Plains Blvd from TH 5 to Grandview Rd in addition to Lake Dr East from Great Plains to 550’ west of the intersection with Dakota Avenue, included in the 2026 Lake Drive East Rehabilitation Project No. 26-02, and WHEREAS, a minimum of ten (10) days’ mailed noticed and two (2) weeks’ published notice of the Public Hearing was given; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was held thereon the 10th day of November, 2025, in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council: 1. The Council will receive and accept the feasibility study on November 10, 2025, and consider the improvements of such project in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting properties for a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. 2. Such improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible as detailed in the project’s Feasibility Study. 3. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the Council resolution adopted June 23, 2025. 4. The Council authorizes preparation of plans and specifications for the 2026 Lake Drive East Rehabilitation Project No. 26-02. 5. The Council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvement from the proceeds of tax exempt bonds. 145 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 10th day of November, 2025. ATTEST: Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 146 Feasibility Report 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project City Project No. 26-02 November 3, 2025 ISG Project No. 25-33064 For: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd Chanhassen, MN 55317 From: Jake Guzik, PE Civil Engineer ISG 7900 International Dr, Suite 550 Bloomington, MN 55425 612.353.7042 Jake.Guzik@ISGInc.com 147 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com i SIGNATURE SHEET I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that i am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Jacob D. Guzik, PE Civil Engineer Reg. No. 55422 ISG 7900 International Dr, Suite 550 Bloomington, MN 55425 612.353.7042 Jake.Guzik@ISGInc.com 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project (City Project No. 26-02) Chanhassen, MN Engineer's Project Number: 25-33064 Dated this 3 day of November, 2025 148 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project ................................................................................................................................................. i Signature Sheet ......................................................................................................................................................................................... i Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................................................................... ii Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Project Need and Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Proposed Improvements .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Streets .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Storm Sewer .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Sanitary Sewer ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Water Main ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Private Utilities ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Construction Limits and Traffic Control ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Opinion of Probable Cost .......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Construction Cost Summary ................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Discussion.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Financing and Assessments ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Financing Overview ............................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Funding Sources and Allocation ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 Assessment Process and Application .................................................................................................................................................. 7 Schedule ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 11 Public Engagement ................................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Findings and Recommendations .......................................................................................................................................................... 12 Findings ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Recommendation ............................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Appendix A: Opinion of Probable Costs .................................................................................................................................................... A Appendix B: Intersection Control Evaluation ........................................................................................................................................... B 149 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Chanhassen has identified Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard as priority corridors for pavement rehabilit ation under the City’s 2026 Pavement Management Program. The existing pavement conditions —measured by Pavement Condition Index (PCI) values—range from the low 40s along Lake Drive East to the low-to-mid 60s along Great Plains Boulevard. These ratings indicate that while the Lake Drive East pavement has reached the end of its serviceable life, the Great Plains Boulevard pavement remain s in moderately good condition with a sound base structure. To address these varying conditions, the proposed City Project No. 26-02 includes a combination of full-depth reclamation (FDR) and mill and overlay improvements: • Lake Drive East will undergo full-depth reclamation to re-stabilize the pavement structure, improve drainage, and provide a uniform base while maintaining existing curb and gutter. • Great Plains Boulevard, from the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Drive East northward, will receive a 2.0 -inch mill and overlay. This treatment will restore ride quality and surface drainage without full base reconstruction, offering the mo st cost- effective solution for this corridor. Additional project improvements include replacement of non-compliant pedestrian ramps, spot sidewalk reconstruction, select curb and gutter replacement, and installation of new signage and pavement markings in accordance with MUTCD standards. These upgrade s will enhance accessibility, safety, and consistency with City design standards. An Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) was completed in September 2025 for the intersection of Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard. Alternatives considered included maintaining two-way stop control, conversion to all-way stop control, and construction of a mini or single-lane roundabout. The evaluation identified the All-Way Stop Control (AWSC) and Mini-Roundabout as the top two performing options. Both alternatives provide substantial safety improvements (up to 70 percent crash reduction potential ) with minimal construction impacts and no right-of-way acquisition required. The Mini-Roundabout offers slightly improved operational performance and pedestrian safety compared to the all-way stop control, while the All-Way Stop achieves comparable safety benefits at significantly lower cost. Either alternative would meet the City’s operational and safety objectives for this intersection, and both are considered viable improvement options for implementation as part of Project 26 -02. The estimated total project cost is $1,306,800 for the All-Way Stop alternative and $1,688,500 for the mini roundabout alternative, which includes construction, contingency, engineering, and administrative expenses. Funding is proposed through a combination of Ci ty Pavement Management Program (PMP) funds, municipal state aid, and special assessments to benefiting properties in accordance with the City’s adopted assessment policy, which allocates 40 percent of street improvement costs to the adjacent parcels. No right-of-way acquisition is anticipated. Based on the findings contained in this report, the Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard Rehabilitation Project is feas ible, necessary, and cost-effective from an engineering standpoint. The improvements will restore structural condition, enhance pedestrian accessibility, and align with the City’s strategic priorities of asset management and financial sustainability. Construction is anticipated to begin in Summer of 2026, following design authorization and bid award. 150 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 2 PROJECT NEED AND PURPOSE The City of Chanhassen’s Pavement Management Program (PMP) provides a data -driven framework to maintain and extend the life of the City’s street network through timely rehabilitation, reconstruction, and preservation projects. Each year, the City evaluates pavement condition, maintenance history, and coordination opportunities with other infrastructure to prioritize improvements that preserve roadway function and minimize life-cycle cost. Based on the most recent pavement condition inventory and field inspections, Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard were identified as priority corridors for rehabilitation in the 2026 construction program. Together, these streets serve a mix of commercial, institutional, and local access traffic, providing key connectivity between Hidden Valley neighborhood, Highway 5, and the surrounding business park area. Pavement condition ratings reveal a clear difference in structural health between the two corridors: • Lake Drive East exhibits Pavement Condition Index (PCI) values in the low 40s, with widespread fatigue cracking, joint deteri oration, and localized base failures. These conditions signify that the pavement has reached the end of its service life and requir es full-depth reclamation (FDR) to restore structural integrity. • Great Plains Boulevard exhibits PCI values in the low-to-mid 60s, showing surface oxidation and moderate cracking but a stable base. A 2.0-inch mill and overlay will address surface aging while preserving the existing pavement structure. In addition to pavement rehabilitation, several related improvements are needed to meet current City and ADA standards: • Pedestrian Accessibility and Sidewalk Condition: Numerous sidewalk panels throughout the project area show cracking, spalling, or settlement. These panels will be replaced to restore continuity and compliance with ADA cross-slope and surface requirements. • Commercial Driveways: Many existing commercial driveways do not fully meet current City geometric or ADA accessibility standards. These will be reconstructed or regraded to meet City standard driveway apron design and accessible sidewalk transitions. • Curb and Gutter / Drainage: Spot curb and gutter replacement is warranted where settlement or cracking impedes surface draina ge or creates ponding. • Storm Sewer Structures: Several catch basins and manholes include aging or non-standard castings that no longer meet the City’s preferred inlet and maintenance standards. These will be replaced or adjusted to grade to ensure uniformity, improved hydraulic performance, and safer maintenance access. • Gate Valve Boxes: Existing gate valve boxes will be adjusted to final surface grade during construction to maintain accessibi lity and alignment with the finished pavement surface. • Intersection Safety: The intersection of Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard exhibits operational and driver-expectation issues common to two-way stop-controlled intersections. An Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE), see Appendix identified All-Way Stop Control (AWSC) and a Mini-Roundabout as the most effective safety and operational alternatives. In summary, the Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard Rehabilitation Project will restore pavement condition, improve ac cessibility, update drainage and utility appurtenances, and enhance intersection safety. The improvements are necessary, cost -effective, and feasible, consistent with Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 and the City’s long -term asset management objectives. 151 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 3 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The proposed improvements for City Project No. 26-02 – Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard Rehabilitation include pavement rehabilitation, storm sewer structure upgrades, utility adjustments, and intersection safety improvements. The project has be en designed to align with the City’s Pavement Management Program (PMP), accessibility goals, and infrastructure standards. Streets Lake Drive East – Full-Depth Reclamation (FDR) Lake Drive East will be rehabilitated using a full-depth reclamation (FDR) process. Field observations and pavement cores indicate severe cracking, base failures, and structural degradation. Under FDR, the existing bituminous pavement and a portion of the underlying aggregate base will be pulverized, blended, and r e-compacted in place to create a uniform stabilized base. The reclaimed base will then be paved with two new bituminous layers 2” Bituminous Non-Wear Course (SPNWB330C) and 2” Bituminous Wear Course (SPWEA340C). Key benefits of FDR include improved cross-slope, uniform structure, and reduced cost compared to full reconstruction. Curb and gutter will remain in place except where replac ement is required due to settlement, cracking, or drainage deficiencies. A field review of the concrete curb and gutter identified a significant number of sections with damaged lip edges, surface sp alling, or deterioration at the joint. While the extent of deterioration warrants numerous spot replacements, the overall curb condition remains serviceable, with the majority of segments structurally sound and properly aligned. To confirm the most cost-effective approach, we analyzed historical unit bid prices from previous pavement rehabilitation projects for both spot curb replacement and complete curb removal and replacement. This review found that full curb replacement becomes more co st- effective only when spot replacement quantities reach approximately 55 percent or more of the total curb length. The current project anticipates replacing roughly 28 percent of the total curb, making spot replacement the more economical and pra ctical option. Great Plains Boulevard – 2.0-Inch Mill and Overlay From Lake Drive East northward to the project limits, Great Plains Boulevard remains structurally sound but shows surface oxi dation and transverse cracking. A 2.0-inch mill and overlay will remove the oxidized surface and replace it with new bituminous pavement, restoring ride quality and extending service life by 10–15 years. Spot curb replacement will be performed at drainage low points or where settlement exists. Pavement markings and traffic cont rol devices will be reinstalled in accordance with MUTCD standards following paving. Sidewalks and ADA Improvements Numerous sidewalk panels within the project area are cracked, spalled, or settled. These panels will be removed and replaced to eliminate tripping hazards and meet ADA cross-slope requirements. All pedestrian curb ramps will be reconstructed to comply with ADA/PROWAG standards, including proper ramp slopes, detectable warning panels, and landing areas. Commercial Driveways Several commercial driveways along both corridors do not meet current City or ADA standards for grades or sidewalk transition s. These will be reconstructed or regraded to meet the City’s standard driveway apron geometry and provide accessible pedestrian cr ossings across driveway aprons. Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) An Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) was completed at the Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard intersection to asse ss safety and operational performance, see summary table 1. The ICE found that both All-Way Stop Control (AWSC) and a Mini-Roundabout provide substantial crash-reduction potential (up to 70%) with no right-of-way impacts. The mini-roundabout offers slightly better pedestrian safety and operational efficiency, while the AWSC is significantly more cost-effective. Both alternatives are considered feasible for construction, and the preferred option will be determined during final design i n coordination with City Council. 152 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 4 Table 1. MnDOT Intersection Control Evaluation Summary – Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd Evaluation Criteria Existing Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) All-Way Stop Control (AWSC) Mini-Roundabout Single-Lane Roundabout Safety Performance Existing crash rate ≈ 0.30 crashes/MEV (≈ 1.5 crashes/yr); baseline for comparison. Up to 70% Reduction Up to 70% Reduction Up to 40% Reduction Operations (LOS/Delay) LOS B overall; side-street delay > 20 s at peak. LOS A–B overall; balanced control. LOS A overall; minimal queuing. LOS A overall; optimal flow. Traffic Volume Suitability Adequate for current volumes (~7,500 ADT). Within MnDOT AWSC limits (≤ 9,000 ADT). Within mini-roundabout capacity (≤ 10,000 ADT). Within roundabout capacity (≤ 15,000 ADT). Pedestrian / Bicycle Safety Limited gaps; poor visibility. Improved pedestrian yielding; reduced approach speed. Good pedestrian safety; short crossing distances. Excellent; lowest pedestrian exposure. Right-of-Way Impacts None. None. None. Moderate (≈ 20–30 ft widening per corner). Construction Cost (Est.) Minimal (< $5 k). ≈ $15 k (signing + marking). ≈ $350k ≈ $700k–$800k Maintenance / Lifecycle Cost Low. Low. Moderate (curb & plow complexity). Moderate-High (landscaping & snow removal). Implementation Complexity None – existing layout. Removal of traffic lanes, simple signing & marking. Moderate – curb mods & drainage adjustments, reduces impervious surface. High – full reconstruction & stormwater treatment and permitting (increase in impervious) Safety Benefit / Cost Ratio — (baseline) ≈ 5 : 1 (high benefit / low cost) ≈ 2.5 : 1 ≈ 0.6 : 1 153 154 155 156 157 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 5 Pavement Markings and Signage All pavement markings and signage will be replaced to conform to current City and MUTCD standards. Existing regulatory and wa rning signs will be updated to meet reflectivity and mounting requirements. New all-way stop signage and “ALL WAY” plaques will be installed if that intersection alternative is selected. Storm Sewer The existing storm sewer system is generally in good condition; however, several structures and castings are outdated or non -standard. Improvements include: • Replacement of aging catch basin and manhole castings with City-standard frames and lids. • Adjustment of storm structures to match new finished surface elevations following pavement reclamation and overlay. Sanitary Sewer No sanitary sewer improvements are proposed as part of this project. Existing sanitary sewer manholes are located outside the pavement rehabilitation area, and field inspection confirmed that there are no operational issues or deficiencies with the underly ing sanitary sewer main crossing the project corridor. The existing system will remain in place and functional during and after construction. Water Main No new water main construction is anticipated. Existing watermain infrastructure will remain in place and be protected during construction. Minor appurtenance work will include: • Adjustment of existing gate valve boxes to match new pavement elevations. • Replacement of non-standard valve box lids with City-standard components as needed. • Coordination with City staff to confirm valve accessibility and protection during pavement reclamation and overlay operations . Private Utilities Private utilities within the corridor include gas, electric, communications, and fiber optic infrastructure. No relocations a re anticipated; however, coordination will occur with each private utility prior to construction to identify potential conflicts and protect existing infrastructure. Coordination typically includes adjusting structures to grade, installing protective sleeves over shallow conduits, and verif ying clearances during reclamation and milling operations. Street Lighting: The existing roadway lighting system along Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard is owned and maintained by the City of Chanhassen. The lighting infrastructure has exceeded its useful life and consists of direct-bury wire and non-standard fixtures. The City, under a separate contract and in coordination with Xcel Energy, will replace the street lighting infrastructure with a new conduit -fed system and upgraded fixtures to meet current efficiency, maintenance, and illumination standards. This lighting replacement will be designed to complement the pavement rehabilitation project and minimize disruption during construction. Construction Limits and Traffic Control The construction will remain within the existing curb lines and public right-of-way, except for localized sidewalk and ramp reconstruction areas. 158 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 6 Temporary lane closures and staging will be required to maintain business access, and detailed traffic control plans will be developed during final design in coordination with affected property owners. OPINION OF PROBABLE COST The following summarizes the engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost for the proposed improvements associated with City Project No. 26-02 – Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard Rehabilitation. Costs are based on preliminary quantities and recent bid pricing from comparable City and regional projects. A 10 -percent contingency has been added to reflect the design development stage of the project, and non-construction costs such as engineering design, construction administration, materials testing, and administrative expenses are included as a separate line item. Construction Cost Summary Table 2: Construction Cost Summary – All Way Stop Control Option Improvement Category Estimated Construction Cost Streets $913,500 Storm Sewer $15,700 Sanitary Sewer $0 Water Main $5,000 Estimated Construction Subtotal $929,200 Contingency (10%) $92,900 Subtotal – Construction and Contingency $1,022,100 Engineering, Administration, and Testing $284,700 Total Estimated Project Cost ≈ $1,306,800 Table 3: Construction Cost Summary – Mini Roundabout Option Improvement Category Estimated Construction Cost Streets $1,255,500 Storm Sewer $15,700 Sanitary Sewer $0 Water Main $5,000 Estimated Construction Subtotal $1,276,200 Contingency (10%) $127,600 Subtotal – Construction and Contingency $1,404,000 Engineering, Administration, and Testing $284,700 Total Estimated Project Cost ≈ $1,688,500 Discussion The total estimated project cost of approximately $1.69 million represents the combined investment required to complete the proposed street, storm sewer, and utility adjustments. Key cost components include: • Full-Depth Reclamation (Lake Drive East): The largest single cost item, driven primarily by the inclusion of a full 4-inch bituminous pavement section consisting of a 2-inch non-wear course (SPNWB330C) and a 2-inch wear course (SPWEA340C). This treatment fully restores the pavement structure through in-place recycling of existing materials and placement of new bituminous layers, resulting in a long-term structural improvement. • Mill and Overlay (Great Plains Boulevard): Cost-effective preservation treatment addressing surface wear while maintaining the existing base. • Sidewalk and ADA Upgrades: Replacement of deteriorated panels and non -compliant ramps to meet City and federal accessibility standards. 159 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 7 • Storm Sewer and Casting Replacement: Replacement of aging castings and adjustments to grade, providing uniform City -standard components. • Intersection Improvements: Implementation of either All-Way Stop Control (AWSC) or Mini-Roundabout at Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard. Both are feasible within the existing right-of-way; the cost estimate reflects the AWSC configuration. All costs are expressed in anticipated 2026 dollars and include labor, materials, equipment, mobilization, traffic control, turf restoration, and erosion control. Actual construction costs will depend on final design, bidding climate, and material pricing at the time of award. FINANCING AND ASSESSMENTS Financing Overview The estimated total project cost of approximately $1,306,800 will be funded through a combination of the City’s Pavement Management Program Fund (PMP), Municipal State Aid funds, special assessments, and utility enterprise funds for minor water and storm sewer work. Funding Sources and Allocation Funding for City Project 26-02 is proposed to be divided among the following sources: Funding Source Estimated Amount Municipal State Aid $992,420 Special Assessments $675,380 Sanitary - Water $5,000 Surface Water $15,700 Total Estimated Project Cost $1,688,500 Per the City’s assessment practice, 40 percent (40%) of the eligible street improvement costs are proposed to be assessed to benefiting properties, with the remaining costs funded by the City through the PMP and applicable utility enterprise funds. The Cit y’s assessment policy, last updated May 5, 2025, did not materially alter commercial assessment procedures but reaffirmed that each project may requ ire case-by- case review to ensure fairness and proportional benefit among commercial parcels. Assessment Process and Application Overview The City of Chanhassen prepared a special assessment roll for the 2026 Lake Drive East Rehabilitation Project (City Project N o. 26-02) in accordance with the City’s Assessment Policy (May 2025) and Minnesota Statutes § 429.051–.061. Assessments recover a portion of project costs from properties that receive a direct and special benefit from the roadway improvements. The project rehabilitates Lake Drive East between Highway 5 and Great Plains Boulevard, serving an entirely commercial and institutional corrid or. All parcels are non-Type 1 (i.e., not single-family residential), so the City evaluated three potential assessment methodologies to ensure fairness and consistency with past practice: 1. Frontage-Based Assessment 2. Trip-Based Assessment 3. Area-Based Assessment (Past City Practice) Each method is permitted under Minnesota law, but their applicability and equity vary depending on parcel configuration, land use intensity, and access characteristics. Policy Basis Under the City’s policy we calculated assessment under the following assumptions: 160 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 8 • All benefiting parcels—including commercial, institutional, and publicly owned sites—may be assessed if they gain measurable benefit in access, functionality, or market value. • Forty percent (40%) of the eligible street construction cost is designated assessable. • Utility rehabilitation is funded from utility or general funds and are not assessable. • For Type 2 parcels, benefit may be allocated using one of two approved methods: o Trip-Based Method – Assessments proportional to estimated daily vehicle trips derived from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition, adjusted for corridor usage based on the project’s Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE). o Area-Based Method (Historic Practice) – Assessments proportional to parcel area (square footage or acres) within the defined benefit zone, reflecting long-term accessibility and development potential. The final method will be selected by City Council following review of project conditions and equity among benefiting parcels. Frontage-Based Assessment A front-foot method allocates assessments proportionally to each parcel’s linear frontage along the improved roadway. While common for residential neighborhoods, it is less appropriate for this corridor due to: • Irregular and Unequal Frontages: Several parcels have extensive frontage (multi-building or corner sites), while others gain full access through shared driveways or cross-access easements but technically have no direct frontage. • Disconnection Between Frontage and Benefit: Some large parcels with limited access points would be over-assessed, while smaller, high-traffic sites would be under-assessed. • Functional Nature of Benefit: The project’s improvements provide corridor-wide operational and safety benefits, not parcel-specific frontage enhancements. For these reasons, a frontage-based allocation would not proportionally reflect special benefit and is not recommended. Area Based Assessment (Past City Practice) Historically, the City of Chanhassen has assessed commercial and institutional corridors based on land area (square footage o r acres) within the defined benefit zone. Under this method, benefit is presumed to relate to the parcel’s overall development potential, size, and long-term accessibility to the improved corridor. Advantages of the area-based approach include: • Consistency with Past City Practice: Provides continuity with prior assessment rolls for similar commercial corridors. • Predictable and Transparent Allocation: Larger parcels with greater development potential contribute proportionally more, while smaller parcels pay less. • Reduced Reliance on Traffic Data: Suitable where land use intensities are stable and trip data is limited. Considerations include: • Variable Land Use Intensity: Some large parcels generate fewer trips than smaller, high -turnover sites, which may reduce the direct link between use and benefit. • Future Redevelopment: Parcel area may reflect long-term potential rather than current use, which can be viewed as either an advantage or a drawback depending on Council intent. The area-based method remains a defensible and practical option, consistent with past City assessments, and may provide a balanced outcome where frontage and access vary widely. Trip-Based Assessment The trip-generation method allocates benefit according to each parcel’s estimated traffic generation, using data from the ITE Trip Generation Manual (12th Edition) and adjusted for the percentage of trips using Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard. Trip generation estimates were developed using available land use information, ITE reference data, and local engineering judgment. Specific traffic counts were not 161 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 9 collected for individual parcels. Instead, corridor-level traffic volumes were estimated from recent traffic counts at the Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard intersection and historical traffic data from nearby Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boul evard segments. These estimates are intended to represent a reasonable and proportional distribution of use among benefiting parcels for assessment purposes. Calculation: Daily vehicle trips are converted into Residential Equivalent Units (REUs) where one REU = 10 daily trips: 𝑅𝐸𝑈𝑠=(Daily Trips × % of Trips Using Corridor) 10 The total assessable cost is divided by total REUs to determine the assessment rate ($/REU). Assessment Rate and Application The total REUs for all benefiting parcels were summed, and the assessment rate ($ / REU) was established by dividing the tota l assessable cost by the total REUs. Each parcel’s assessment equals: Assessment ($) = Parcel REUs × Rate ($ / REU) For example, a total assessable cost of $675,380 divided by 1,539 REUs yields an assessment rate of $438.99 per REU. A parcel generating 1,000 daily trips (100 REUs) would be assessed approximately $43,899.00. Parcels with shared access or internal driveways would have REUs distributed proportionally based on each parcel’s estimated traffic contribution. Assessment Summary Table Method Basis of Allocation Advantages Considerations/Limitations Frontage-Based Linear Frontage Simple to apply Not equitable for parcels with shared access or no direct frontage Trip-Based Estimated daily vehicle trips Reflects roadway usage and intensity Requires assumptions and engineering judgement Area-Based Parcel Area Consistent with past City practices; simple and transparent May not fully represent traffic intensity Assessment Conclusion Both the Trip-Based and Area-Based allocation methods provide reasonable and legally defensible means of distributing the assessable cost of $675,380 among the benefiting commercial and institutional parcels. Each method has strengths and limitations depending on how closely its underlying metric (traffic generation or land area) aligns with measurable benefit. The Trip-Based method assigns costs according to estimated daily vehicle trips derived from ITE data, adjusted for corridor use. While this method reflects roadway utilization, it introduces variability due to the reliance on generalized trip generation rates and a ssumptions regarding internal traffic patterns. As shown in the preliminary assessment roll, several parcels with low daily trip generation —such as churches or municipal uses—would receive relatively low assessments, while larger retail parcels with higher traffic volumes would bear a significantly higher share of the project cost. The Area-Based method, which has been the City’s historic practice for similar commercial corridors, distributes costs in proportion to parcel size. This approach results in a more consistent and predictable allocation across properties and generally reflects long -term accessibility and development potential. The comparison of methods indicates that the Area-Based assessment yields fewer extreme variations between parcels, particularly for institutional or shared-access sites where frontage or traffic data may not accurately represent benefit. Based on the analysis, both methods meet the statutory requirement that assessments be commensurate with special benefit. However, considering: 162 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 10 • The corridor’s mixed commercial and institutional character; • The presence of shared and indirect access arrangements; and • The City’s historic reliance on area-based assessments for similar projects; it may be appropriate to apply an Area-Based assessment methodology for the final assessment roll. This method provides continuity with past City practice, aligns with the character of the benefiting properties, and results in a more balanced distribution of cost while maintaining defensibility under Minnesota Statutes § 429.051. The final assessment methodology will be determined through coordination with City staff and City Council during the assessment hearing process. Adjustments may be made as part of the final roll to ensure equitable treatment among all benefiting parcels. 163 Lake D ri v e E a s t Minnes o t a Hi g h w a y 5 Great Plains BlvdLake DrivePond Promenade Marsh DrH i d d e n C t Hidden L a n e Lake Drive Main StreetPond Promenade Po n d P r om e n a d e 103 105 104 106 107 109 108 100 101 110 102 112 Silo Buildings LLCPID: 258560020 CHCR LLCPID: 258560010 VOP I LLCPID: 258330030 Lakewinds Natural Foods CooperativePID: 257690010 CH Retail Fund/MPLS Village Shoppes LLC PID: 257650020 CPEC Exchange 39560 & 39561 LLCPID: 253460010 New Horizon Real Estate Dvlmt 6 LLPPID: 253460020 DOC-300 Lake Drive East Mob LLC PID: 255900010 American Legion - ChanhassenPID: 255900020 Bongard's Creameries PID: 253451110 Chanhassen HRAPID: 253451111 Discovery United Methodist ChurchPID: 253451120 111 Charter Bank PID: 257650010 0.94 Acres 1.19 Acres 1.34 Acres 0.75 Acres 0.46 Acres 1.40 Acres 1.34 Acres 0.58 Acres 3.46 Acres 2.11 Acres 4.20 Acres 0.64 Acres 3.56 Acres 114 115 118 116 121 125 123 122 113 117 120 119 124 Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc PID: 258680040 3.96 Acres Pond Promenade Ventures LLCPID: 2578300200.93 Acres Pond Promenade Ventures LLCPID: 257830010 1.78 Acres Wheatstone Restaurant Group PID: 258620010 1.37 Acres Villages on the PondsPID: 258460020 1.40 Acres Suraj Hospitality LLCPID: 258680010 2.14 Acres Mara Sports Marketing LLC PID: 258460010 0.66 Acres Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc PID: 258680030 3.35 Acres PHM/Chanhassen Inc PID: 258380010 5.11 Acres Church of St. HubertPID: 2584400201.88 Acres Store Master Funding VI LLCPID: 2584400100.56 Acres Church of St. HubertPID: 2586800209.28 Acres Church of St. HubertPID: 258680130 1.31 AcresMa r k e t B l v d (C o u n t y R d 1 0 1 ) La k e D r i v e ISGInc.comArchitecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\33000 PROJ\33000-33099\33064 2026 LAKE DRIVE E REHAB PROJEC- CHANHASSEN MN\33064 PRODUCTION FILES\33064 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\CONCEPTS-EXHIBITS\33064 ASSESSMENT ROLL 2.DWG SAVED BY: JAKE.GUZIK CITY PROJECT NO. 26-02 ISG PROJECT NO. 25-33064 2026 Lake Dr Rehabilitation Project Chanhassen, Minnesota - 10/20/2025 Sheet Number 1 of 1 Assessment Exhibit N0 SCALE IN FEET 150 300 LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT AREA PROPERTY NUMBER1XX 164 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project - Preliminary Assessment Roll Trip Based Assessable Street Cost: 675,380.00$ Baseline: 10 trips = 1 REU Rate per REU =284.55$ Property Number P.I.D. Taxpayer Taxpayer Address Property Address Land Use Code (ITE) Assessable Trips REUs Assessment 100 258560020 Silo Buildings LLC 3561 44th St W Minneapolis, MN 55410 420 440 Pond Promenade Multi-tenant Retail 1750 175 49,796.25$ 101 258560010 CHCR LLC PO Box 1038 Mason City, IA 50402 450 Pond Promenade Fast Food w/Drive Thru 1250 125 35,568.75$ 102 257690010 Lakewinds Natural Foods Cooperative 6321 Bury Dr Ste 21 Ste 100 Eden Prairie, MN 55346 435 Pond Promenade Retail Supermarket 2550 255 72,560.25$ 103 253460010 CPEC Exchange 39560 & 39561 LLC 12 Blue Jay Ln N North Oaks, MN 55127 320 380 Lake Dr E Multi-tenant Retail 2150 215 61,178.25$ 104 255900010 Doc-300 Lake Drive East Mob LLC 309 N Water St Ste 500 Milwaukee, WI 53202 300 Lake Dr E Medical Office 1500 150 42,682.50$ 105 253460020 New Horizon Real Estate Dvlmt 6 LLP 3405 Annapolis Ln N #100 Minneapolis, MN 55447 310 Lake Dr E Day Care Center 650 65 18,495.75$ 106 255900020 American Legion - Chanhassen 290 Lake Dr E Chanhassen, MN 55317 290 Lake Dr E Assembly/Restaurant 900 90 25,609.50$ 107 253451110 Bongards' Creameries 250 Lake Dr Chanhassen, MN 55317 250 Lake Dr E Industrial Office 1625 162.5 46,239.38$ 108 253451120 Discovery United Methodist Church 275 Lake Dr E Chanhassen, MN 55317 275 Lake Dr E Church 760 76 21,625.80$ 109 253451111 Chanhassen HRA PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Public Access 150 15 4,268.25$ 110 258330030 VOP I LLC PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Shared Parking Lot 400 40 11,382.00$ 111 257650010 Charter Bank 1010 W Clairemont Ave Eau Claire, WI 54701 455 Pond Promenade Bank 700 70 19,918.50$ 112 257650020 CH Retail Fund/MPLS Village Shoppes LLC 3819 Maple Ave Dallas, TX 75219 460 464 Lake Dr Shopping Center 1000 100 28,455.00$ 113 258680030 Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc. PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Private Road 2000 200 56,910.00$ 114 258680010 Suraj Hospitality LLC 570 Pond Promenade Chanhassen, MN 55317 570 Pond Promenade Hotel 600 60 17,073.00$ 115 258620010 Wheatstone Restaurant Group 600 Market St Ste 230, Chanhassen, MN 55317 530 Pond Promenade Restaurant 550 55 15,650.25$ 116 257830010 Pond Promenade Ventures LLC 705 Marquette Ave S Ste 900, Minneapolis, MN 55402 510 Lake Dr Free Standing Store 850 85 24,186.75$ 117 257830020 Pond Promenade Ventures LLC 705 Marquette Ave S Ste 900, Minneapolis, MN 55402 Private Road/Parking Lot 150 15 4,268.25$ 118 258460010 Mara Sports Marketing LLC 3728 Woodland Cove Pkwy Minnetrista, MN 55331 550 Lake Dr Day Care Center 650 65 18,495.75$ 119 258460020 Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc. PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Private Drive/Storm Detention 50 5 1,422.75$ 120 258680040 Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc. PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Storm Detention Pond 0 0 -$ 121 258380010 PHM/Chanhassen Inc 2845 Hamline Ave N, Roseville, MN 55113 501 Lake Dr Continuing Care Retirement Community 500 50 14,227.50$ 122 258440010 Store Master Funding VI LLC 10050 Crosstown Cir Ste 650 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 421 Lake Dr Commercial Rec Indoor 350 35 9,959.25$ 123 258680020 Church of St. Hubert 8201 Main St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 8201 Main St Church/School 2000 200 56,910.00$ 124 258440020 Church of St. Hubert 8201 Main St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Parking Lot 350 35 9,959.25$ 125 258680130 Church of St. Hubert 8201 Main St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Parking Lot 300 30 8,536.50$ 23735 675,380.00$ 165 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project - Preliminary Assessment Roll Area-Based Assessabl e Street Cost: 675,380.00$ Rate per Acre =13,347.43$ Property Number P.I.D. Taxpayer Taxpayer Address Property Address Assessable Area Assessment Notes 100 258560020 Silo Buildings LLC 3561 44th St W Minneapolis, MN 55410 420 440 Pond Promenade 1.19 15,883.44$ 101 258560010 CHCR LLC PO Box 1038 Mason City, IA 50402 450 Pond Promenade 0.94 12,546.58$ 102 257690010 Lakewinds Natural Foods Cooperative 6321 Bury Dr Ste 21 Ste 100 Eden Prairie, MN 55346 435 Pond Promenade 1.34 17,885.56$ 103 253460010 CPEC Exchange 39560 & 39561 LLC 12 Blue Jay Ln N North Oaks, MN 55127 320 380 Lake Dr E 1.34 17,885.56$ 104 255900010 Doc-300 Lake Drive East Mob LLC 309 N Water St Ste 500 Milwaukee, WI 53202 300 Lake Dr E 3.46 46,182.11$ 105 253460020 New Horizon Real Estate Dvlmt 6 LLP 3405 Annapolis Ln N #100 Minneapolis, MN 55447 310 Lake Dr E 0.58 7,741.51$ 106 255900020 American Legion - Chanhassen 290 Lake Dr E Chanhassen, MN 55317 290 Lake Dr E 2.11 28,163.08$ 107 253451110 Bongards' Creameries 250 Lake Dr Chanhassen, MN 55317 250 Lake Dr E 4.20 56,059.21$ 108 253451120 Discovery United Methodist Church 275 Lake Dr E Chanhassen, MN 55317 275 Lake Dr E 3.56 47,516.85$ 109 253451111 Chanhassen HRA PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 0.64 8,542.36$ 110 258330030 VOP I LLC PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 0.75 10,010.57$ 111 257650010 Charter Bank 1010 W Clairemont Ave Eau Claire, WI 54701 455 Pond Promenade 0.46 6,139.82$ 112 257650020 CH Retail Fund/MPLS Village Shoppes LLC 3819 Maple Ave Dallas, TX 75219 460 464 Lake Dr 1.40 18,686.40$ 113 258680030 Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc. PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 3.35 44,713.89$ 114 258680010 Suraj Hospitality LLC 570 Pond Promenade Chanhassen, MN 55317 570 Pond Promenade 2.14 28,563.50$ 115 258620010 Wheatstone Restaurant Group 600 Market St Ste 230, Chanhassen, MN 55317 530 Pond Promenade 1.37 18,285.98$ 116 257830010 Pond Promenade Ventures LLC 705 Marquette Ave S Ste 900, Minneapolis, MN 55402 510 Lake Dr 1.78 23,758.43$ 117 257830020 Pond Promenade Ventures LLC 705 Marquette Ave S Ste 900, Minneapolis, MN 55402 0.93 12,413.11$ 118 258460010 Mara Sports Marketing LLC 3728 Woodland Cove Pkwy Minnetrista, MN 55331 550 Lake Dr 0.66 8,809.30$ 119 258460020 Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc. PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 0.26 3,470.33$ Private drive & storm pond 120 258680040 Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc. PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 0.00 -$ Detention Pond Not Included in Assessment 121 258380010 PHM/Chanhassen Inc 2845 Hamline Ave N, Roseville, MN 55113 501 Lake Dr 5.11 68,205.37$ 122 258440010 Store Master Funding VI LLC 10050 Crosstown Cir Ste 650 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 421 Lake Dr 0.56 7,474.56$ 123 258680020 Church of St. Hubert 8201 Main St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 8201 Main St 9.28 123,864.15$ 124 258440020 Church of St. Hubert 8201 Main St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 1.88 25,093.17$ 125 258680130 Church of St. Hubert 8201 Main St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 1.31 17,485.13$ 50.6 675,380.00$ 166 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project - Preliminary Assessment Roll Trip-Base vs. Area-Based Assessable Street Cost: 675,380.00$ Property Number P.I.D. Taxpayer Taxpayer Address Property Address Trips Based Area Based Change (Trip vs. Area) 100 258560020 Silo Buildings LLC 3561 44th St W Minneapolis, MN 55410 420 440 Pond Promenade 49,796.25$ 15,883.44$ 33,912.81$ 101 258560010 CHCR LLC PO Box 1038 Mason City, IA 50402 450 Pond Promenade 35,568.75$ 12,546.58$ 23,022.17$ 102 257690010 Lakewinds Natural Foods Cooperative 6321 Bury Dr Ste 21 Ste 100 Eden Prairie, MN 55346 435 Pond Promenade 72,560.25$ 17,885.56$ 54,674.69$ 103 253460010 CPEC Exchange 39560 & 39561 LLC 12 Blue Jay Ln N North Oaks, MN 55127 320 380 Lake Dr E 61,178.25$ 17,885.56$ 43,292.69$ 104 255900010 Doc-300 Lake Drive East Mob LLC 309 N Water St Ste 500 Milwaukee, WI 53202 300 Lake Dr E 42,682.50$ 46,182.11$ (3,499.61)$ 105 253460020 New Horizon Real Estate Dvlmt 6 LLP 3405 Annapolis Ln N #100 Minneapolis, MN 55447 310 Lake Dr E 18,495.75$ 7,741.51$ 10,754.24$ 106 255900020 American Legion - Chanhassen 290 Lake Dr E Chanhassen, MN 55317 290 Lake Dr E 25,609.50$ 28,163.08$ (2,553.58)$ 107 253451110 Bongards' Creameries 250 Lake Dr Chanhassen, MN 55317 250 Lake Dr E 46,239.38$ 56,059.21$ (9,819.83)$ 108 253451120 Discovery United Methodist Church 275 Lake Dr E Chanhassen, MN 55317 275 Lake Dr E 21,625.80$ 47,516.85$ (25,891.05)$ 109 253451111 Chanhassen HRA PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 0 4,268.25$ 8,542.36$ (4,274.11)$ 110 258330030 VOP I LLC PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 0 11,382.00$ 10,010.57$ 1,371.43$ 111 257650010 Charter Bank 1010 W Clairemont Ave Eau Claire, WI 54701 455 Pond Promenade 19,918.50$ 6,139.82$ 13,778.68$ 112 257650020 CH Retail Fund/MPLS Village Shoppes LLC 3819 Maple Ave Dallas, TX 75219 460 464 Lake Dr 28,455.00$ 18,686.40$ 9,768.60$ 113 258680030 Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc. PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 0 56,910.00$ 44,713.89$ 12,196.11$ 114 258680010 Suraj Hospitality LLC 570 Pond Promenade Chanhassen, MN 55317 570 Pond Promenade 17,073.00$ 28,563.50$ (11,490.50)$ 115 258620010 Wheatstone Restaurant Group 600 Market St Ste 230, Chanhassen, MN 55317 530 Pond Promenade 15,650.25$ 18,285.98$ (2,635.73)$ 116 257830010 Pond Promenade Ventures LLC 705 Marquette Ave S Ste 900, Minneapolis, MN 55402 510 Lake Dr 24,186.75$ 23,758.43$ 428.32$ 117 257830020 Pond Promenade Ventures LLC 705 Marquette Ave S Ste 900, Minneapolis, MN 55402 0 4,268.25$ 12,413.11$ (8,144.86)$ 118 258460010 Mara Sports Marketing LLC 3728 Woodland Cove Pkwy Minnetrista, MN 55331 550 Lake Dr 18,495.75$ 8,809.30$ 9,686.45$ 119 258460020 Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc. PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 0 1,422.75$ 3,470.33$ (2,047.58)$ 120 258680040 Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc. PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 0 -$ -$ -$ 121 258380010 PHM/Chanhassen Inc 2845 Hamline Ave N, Roseville, MN 55113 501 Lake Dr 14,227.50$ 68,205.37$ (53,977.87)$ 122 258440010 Store Master Funding VI LLC 10050 Crosstown Cir Ste 650 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 421 Lake Dr 9,959.25$ 7,474.56$ 2,484.69$ 123 258680020 Church of St. Hubert 8201 Main St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 8201 Main St 56,910.00$ 123,864.15$ (66,954.15)$ 124 258440020 Church of St. Hubert 8201 Main St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 0 9,959.25$ 25,093.17$ (15,133.92)$ 125 258680130 Church of St. Hubert 8201 Main St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 0 8,536.50$ 17,485.13$ (8,948.63)$ 675,380.00$ 675,380.00$ 167 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 11 SCHEDULE Milestone Date Accept Feasibility Report; Call Public Hearing October 27, 2025 Neighboorhood Project Open House October 30, 2025 Feasiblity Hearing & Order Project November 10, 2025 City Council Approves Plan & Authorizes Ad for Bid January 12, 2026 Bid Opening February 4, 2026 Call Assessment Hearing February 9, 2026 Neighborhood Meeting February 11, 2026 Assessment Hearing; Award Contract February 23, 2026 Start Construction May 11, 2026 Substantial Completion October 2, 2026 Final Completion June 11, 2027 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT A. Overview Public engagement for the Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard Rehabilitation Project (City Project No. 26-02) included both online and in-person opportunities for residents, business owners, and corridor users to review the proposed improvements and provide feedback. An online survey was posted on the City’s website in advance of the feasibility study to collect initial impressions about roadway condition, intersection operations, pedestrian accessibility, and business access. A public open house was held on October 30, 2025, at the Chanhassen City Hall. More than 25 attendees participated, including adjacent property owners, business representatives, and community members who regularly travel the corridor. City staff and the engineering consultant team presented the preliminary design concepts, discussed the intersection control options identified in the Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE), and gathered public input on priorities and concerns. B. Summary of Feedback Comments from the open house and online survey were generally constructive and supportive of the pavement rehabilitation and ADA improvements. Key themes included: Intersection Safety and Traffic Operations Many respondents expressed concern about the Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard intersection, citing difficulty making left turns, limited visibility, and driver confusion regarding right-of-way. • Several supported an All-Way Stop or Mini-Roundabout to slow traffic and improve safety for both drivers and pedestrians. • One respondent noted that “the intersection is difficult even in a vehicle,” while another said, “a roundabout would slow traffic and enable turns easier.” • A few commenters also mentioned safety at nearby intersections such as Lake Drive East and Marsh Drive, requesting improved crossings or warning flashers. Pedestrian and Bicycle Connectivity Strong support was expressed for improving sidewalks and crossings, particularly near the pedestrian bridge and between Mission Hills, Lakewinds, and Park Nicollet Clinic. • Residents frequently noted gaps in sidewalk continuity, especially along Great Plains Boulevard’s east side and between Grandview Road and Lake Drive East. • One respondent wrote, “It would be nice to have a continuous sidewalk on the east side of Great Plains. Right now, you have to cross twice.” 168 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 12 • Another mentioned that “quick access to nature parks” and better trail linkages would encourage more walking and biking. Drainage and Maintenance Concerns Several participants reported localized drainage issues, including icy conditions and ponding near storm inlets—particularly on the south side of Lake Drive East near Great Plains Boulevard and the east side of the Lakewinds building. Respondents asked that these issues be reviewed and corrected during design. Speed and Access Speed and turning movements along both corridors were mentioned multiple times. • A few residents described visibility challenges when turning from Lake Drive East onto Great Plains Boulevard, and requested intersection lighting or clearer lane markings. • Some residents along Marsh Drive noted concerns about vehicle speeds and pedestrian safety, suggesting that lower speed limits or enhanced crossings be considered near Lake Drive East. Assessments and Communication A few respondents inquired about project funding and assessment methods, expressing interest in how costs would be distributed among benefiting parcels. The City provided information during the open house and noted that final assessments will be determined i n accordance with City policy and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. General Support for the Project Overall sentiment was positive, with multiple participants thanking the City and ISG for hosting the open house and for inclu ding the public early in the design process. Comments such as “Thanks for all your thoughtful work” and “Please complete the project in an efficient and cost -effective manner” reflected general appreciation for the planned improvements. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This feasibility report has been prepared in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 to advise the City Council on the need, feasibility, and cost of improvements to Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard. Findings Necessity: Pavement on Lake Drive East (PCI ≈ 40) and Great Plains Boulevard (PCI ≈ 60) has deteriorated beyond routine maintenance. Reh abilitation is needed to restore pavement structure, ride quality, and drainage. Cost-Effectiveness: Full-depth reclamation on Lake Drive East and a 2-inch mill and overlay on Great Plains Boulevard provide the most economical solution for the existing conditions while preserving curb and base materials. The Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) further demonstrated that both the All-Way Stop Control (AWSC) and Mini-Roundabout alternatives would significantly improve intersection safety, with potential crash reductions of up to 70 percent. However, the AWS C provides nearly equivalent safety benefits at substantially lower cost—approximately $15,000 compared to $350,000 for a Mini-Roundabout—resulting in a higher safety benefit-to-cost ratio (≈ 5:1 vs. 2.5:1). The Mini-Roundabout and All-Way Stop Control each meet the project’s operational and safety objectives. The Mini-Roundabout may improve flow and pedestrian visibility, while the All-Way Stop represents a lower-cost alternative with simpler maintenance requirements. Final selection will be determined through coordination with City staff and Council during design development. 169 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 13 Feasibility: The work can be completed within existing right-of-way with minimal utility conflicts. Storm and water improvements are limited to casting and valve adjustments; no sanitary sewer work is required. Standards and Coordination: All improvements will meet current City design and ADA standards. Street-lighting replacement will occur under a separate City contract coordinated with Xcel Energy. Funding Equity: Project costs will be shared between benefiting property owners and the public in accordance with City policy —approximately 40 % assessed and 60% funded through the City’s Pavement Management Program and utility enterprise funds. Recommendation The proposed Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard Rehabilitation (Project No. 26-02) is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible. It is recommended that the City Council: • Accept this Feasibility Report. • Call for a Public Improvement Hearing under Minn. Stat. § 429.031. 170 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com A APPENDIX A: OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS 171 Cost Estimate Item No.MnDOT No.ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL AMOUNT 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 2 2104.502 REMOVE CASTING EA 6 150.00$ 900.00$ 3 2104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EA 1 500.00$ 500.00$ 4 2104.502 REMOVE CONCRETE MEDIAN LF 350 30.00$ 10,500.00$ 5 2104.503 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER LF 2390 8.00$ 19,120.00$ 6 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE MEDIAN NOSE SY 40 25.00$ 1,000.00$ 7 2104.504 REMOVE SIDEWALK SY 4775 15.00$ 71,625.00$ 8 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 450 20.00$ 9,000.00$ 9 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 770 10.00$ 7,700.00$ 10 2104.518 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALK SF 275 10.00$ 2,750.00$ 11 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON CY 2740 25.00$ 68,500.00$ 12 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TN 320 20.00$ 6,400.00$ 13 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION (P) SY 12775 5.00$ 63,875.00$ 14 2231.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) - DRIVEWAYTON 30 200.00$ 6,000.00$ 15 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 3680 100.00$ 368,000.00$ 16 2504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX - WATER EA 6 800.00$ 4,800.00$ 17 2505.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX - GAS EA 1 800.00$ 800.00$ 18 2506.502 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING EA 4 500.00$ 2,000.00$ 19 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY-STORM EA 6 1,500.00$ 9,000.00$ 20 2506.603 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SPECIAL EA 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 21 2521.518 6" CONCRETE WALK SF 5805 10.00$ 58,050.00$ 22 2521.518 8" CONCRETE WALK SF 2400 15.00$ 36,000.00$ 23 2531.504 8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 670 135.00$ 90,450.00$ 24 2531.504 CONCRETE MEDIAN SY 700 100.00$ 70,000.00$ 25 2531.602 CONCRETE MEDIAN NOSE-SPECIAL EA 3 3,500.00$ 10,500.00$ 26 2531.603 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 3459 40.00$ 138,360.00$ 27 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES SF 140 70.00$ 9,800.00$ 28 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 40,000.00$ 40,000.00$ 29 2564.518 SIGN PANEL SF 168 65.00$ 10,920.00$ 30 2564.602 SIGN PANEL POST EA 28 250.00$ 7,000.00$ 31 2565.602 RIGID PVC LOOP DETECTOR EA 11 1,200.00$ 13,200.00$ 32 2574.507 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW CY 120 75.00$ 9,000.00$ 33 2575.605 TURF ESTABLISHMENT ACRE 0.5 34,000.00$ 17,000.00$ 34 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE MULTI COMP GR IN LF 1135 4.50$ 5,107.50$ 35 2582.503 4" DBLE SOLID LINE MULTI COMP GR IN LF 1635 7.00$ 11,445.00$ 36 2582.518 PAVT MSSG MULTI COMP GR IN SF 120 30.00$ 3,600.00$ 37 2582.518 CROSSWALK MULTI COMP GR IN SF 738 20.00$ 14,760.00$ $1,276,162.50 $127,616.25 Total Construction Cost $1,403,778.75 $284,670.00 $1,688,448.75 Construction Costs 10% Contingency Non-Construction Cost TOTAL PROJECT COST Client Name: CITY OF CHANHASSEN Location: CHANHASSEN, MN Date: 10/21/2025 ISG Project Number: 33064 Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost - Mini-Roundabout + FDR Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com 172 Cost Estimate Item No. MnDOT No.ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL AMOUNT 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 2 2104.502 REMOVE CASTING EA 6 $150.00 $900.00 3 2104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 4 2104.503 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER LF 1860 $8.00 $14,880.00 5 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE MEDIAN NOSE SY 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 6 2104.504 REMOVE SIDEWALK SY 4775 $15.00 $71,625.00 7 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 450 $20.00 $9,000.00 8 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 480 $8.00 $3,840.00 9 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 770 $10.00 $7,700.00 10 2104.518 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALK SF 275 $10.00 $2,750.00 11 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON CY 1030 $25.00 $25,750.00 12 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TN 320 $20.00 $6,400.00 13 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION (P) SY 8825 $7.00 $61,775.00 14 2232.504 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2") SY 3700 $4.00 $14,800.00 15 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) - DRIVEWAY TON 30 $200.00 $6,000.00 16 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 1460 $100.00 $146,000.00 17 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 1110 $100.00 $111,000.00 18 2504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX - WATER EA 6 $800.00 $4,800.00 19 2505.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX - GAS EA 1 $800.00 $800.00 20 2506.502 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING EA 4 $500.00 $2,000.00 21 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY-STORM EA 6 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 22 2506.603 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SPECIAL EA 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 23 2521.518 6" CONCRETE WALK SF 5805 $10.00 $58,050.00 24 2521.518 8" CONCRETE WALK SF 2400 $15.00 $36,000.00 25 2531.504 8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 420 $135.00 $56,700.00 26 2531.602 CONCRETE MEDIAN NOSE-SPECIAL EA 3 $3,500.00 $10,500.00 27 2531.603 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 1675 $40.00 $67,000.00 28 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES SF 140 $70.00 $9,800.00 29 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 30 2564.518 SIGN PANEL SF 168 $65.00 $10,920.00 31 2564.602 SIGN PANEL POST EA 28 $250.00 $7,000.00 32 2565.602 RIGID PVC LOOP DETECTOR EA 11 $1,200.00 $13,200.00 33 2574.507 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW CY 120 $75.00 $9,000.00 34 2575.605 TURF ESTABLISHMENT ACRE 0.65 $34,000.00 $22,100.00 35 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE MULTI COMP GR IN LF 1135 $4.50 $5,107.50 36 2582.503 4" DBLE SOLID LINE MULTI COMP GR IN LF 1635 $7.00 $11,445.00 37 2582.518 PAVT MSSG MULTI COMP GR IN SF 120 $30.00 $3,600.00 38 2582.518 CROSSWALK MULTI COMP GR IN SF 738 $20.00 $14,760.00 $929,202.50 $92,920.25 Total Construction Cost $1,022,122.75 $284,670.00 $1,306,792.75 Construction Costs 10% Contingency Non-Construction Cost TOTAL PROJECT COST Client Name: CITY OF CHANHASSEN Location: CHANHASSEN, MN Date: 10/20/2025 ISG Project Number: 33064 Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost - AWSC & FDR Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com 173 2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com B APPENDIX B: INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION 174 Funding: Local Funds, Municipal State Aid (Chanhassen, MN) Work Identification: Road Rehabilitation I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Corona Woychik, PE, PTOE Lic. No. Date ISG Reviewed: City of Chanhassen Date 09/17/2025 Great Plains Blvd and Lake Dr E Chanhassen, MN for INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION 59049 10/31/2025 175 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 1 Table of Contents Purpose and Need...................................................................................................................... 1 Existing Roadway Characteristics ................................................................................................. 2 Future Roadway Characteristics ................................................................................................... 5 Analysis of Alternatives .............................................................................................................. 8 Summary ............................................................................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Traffic Counts ......................................................................................................... A Appendix B: Illustration of Crashes ............................................................................................. B Appendix C: Warrant Analysis .................................................................................................... C Appendix D: Synchro Capacity Analysis ....................................................................................... D Appendix E: Roundabout Exhibits ............................................................................................... E Appendix F: Intersection Sight Distance ....................................................................................... F Appendix G: Future Approach Lane Queue and LOS ....................................................................... G List of Tables Table 1: Traffic Data from 2025 Traffic Counts ............................................................................... 3 Table 2: Existing Turning Movements from July 2025 Traffic Counts .................................................. 4 Table 3: Historical Average Daily Traffic ........................................................................................ 5 Table 4: 2025 Traffic Volume at Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E (Adjusted Seasonal Variation) ............... 6 Table 5: 2045 Future Traffic Volumes at Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E (0.5% Growth Rate) ................. 7 Table 6: Crash Analysis Summary ................................................................................................ 9 Table 7: Signal Warrant Summary ............................................................................................. 11 Table 8: TWSC, AWSC and Roundabout Level of Service ............................................................... 12 Table 9: Signalized Intersection Level of Service ........................................................................... 12 Table 10: Existing (2025) Capacity Analysis Summary ................................................................... 12 Table 11: Future Year (2045) Capacity Analysis Summary ............................................................. 13 Table 12: Alternative Intersection Control Analysis Summary ......................................................... 16 Table 13: Recommendations (2045) Analysis Summary ................................................................ 17 List of Figures Figure 1: Intersection Location Map .............................................................................................. 1 Figure 2: Great Plains Blvd and Lake Dr E Intersection Geometrics .................................................... 2 Figure 3: Historical Traffic Data .................................................................................................... 6 Figure 4: Traffic Data Sources ..................................................................................................... 7 176 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 1 Figure 1: Intersection Location Map Purpose and Need The City of Chanhassen is undertaking a roadway improvement project to rehabilitate a portion of Lake Drive East and a portion of Great Plains Boulevard totaling approximately 0.5 miles. This corridor lies within a predominantly commercial area, while also serving as a key access route to nearby residential neighborhoods. The project area includes two Municipal State Aid (MSA) streets, both of which are designated as collector roadways. • Lake Drive East between Great Plains Boulevard and Dakota Avenue, and • Great Plains Boulevard between Trunk Highway (TH) 5 and Lake Drive East. The existing roadway infrastructure was originally constructed in the early 1990s. Since then, it has only received routine surface maintenance, including seal coating, and is now showing signs of aging and deterioration. Given the age and condition of the pavement, a pavement rehabilitation project is necessary to restore structural integrity, enhance safety, and support current and future traffic demands. This project also includes an Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) as part of the preliminary design to assess and improve intersection operations and safety within the corridor. The proposed improvements will address both pavement needs and operational efficiencies to ensure the corridor continues to serve its mixed-use environment effectively. 177 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 2 Figure 2: Great Plains Blvd and Lake Dr E Intersection Geometrics Existing Roadway Characteristics Lake Drive East runs for approximately 0.5 miles between Great Plains Boulevard and Dakota Avenue in Chanhassen, serving as a key connector for both residential and commercial areas. Classified by MnDOT as a Major Collector, the roadway features two travel lanes, supporting two -way traffic. Curb and gutter are present on both sides, along with a 5-foot concrete sidewalk on one side. The posted speed limit is 30 mph, and several access points line the corridor, providing direct entry to adjacent properties. Lake Drive East also intersects Marsh Drive and Hidden Court at two-way stop-controlled intersections, with stops signs at both Marsh Drive and Hidden Court. 178 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 3 Table 1: Traffic Data from 2025 Traffic Counts According to MnDOT’s Traffic Mapping Application, this segment of Lake Drive East carries a 2024 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) of 3,295 vehicles. At Lake Drive East’s intersection with Great Plains Boulevard, traffic on Lake Drive East is stop- controlled, while Great Plains Boulevard traffic flows without interruption. A marked pedestrian crosswalk across Great Plains Boulevard accommodates pedestrian demand in this mixed-use area. The segment of Great Plains Boulevard between Minnesota Trunk Highway (TH) 5 and Lake Drive East is classified as a Major Collector and carries heavier traffic volumes. This portion provides critical connectivity to TH 5 and features a more complex roadway configuration, including three 12-foot through lanes, a 12-foot right-turn lane, and an 11-foot left-turn lane. An 8-foot wide raised median is present through part of the intersection area. As of 2024, the AADT on this segment is 7,234 vehicles. Two commercial driveways intersect this stretch; however, one is proposed to be removed as part of the proposed project. TRAFFIC DATA The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and Turning Movement Count (TMC) data were collected on 1st, 2nd and 12th of July 2025 to evaluate the intersection control at Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Drive East. All corresponding traffic count reports are provided in Appendix A. These reports include peak-hour volumes, flow rates, total vehicle volumes, and hourly traffic counts for Weekday AM, Weekday PM, and Saturday peak periods. To ensure the analysis represents typical travel patterns, data was collected on weekdays and a weekend day, avoiding holidays. Tuesday and Wednesday were chosen to reflect regular commuting traffic conditions, while a three -hour count on Saturday was conducted to capture turning movements and weekend recreational or non-work travel demand, supporting the operational analysis. Average Daily Traffic AM Peak Volume PM Peak Volume Great Plains Blvd North of Lake Dr E 4,526 329 413 Lake Dr E East of Great Plains Blvd 2,859 227 261 Great Plains Blvd South of Lake Dr E 6,687 522 383 Business Access West of Great Plains Blvd 4,449 348 583 A 48-hour traffic count revealed distinct peak periods at 8:00 AM, 11:00 AM, 12:00 PM, 4:00 PM, and 6:00 PM, corresponding to commuter and midday travel patterns. Great Plains Boulevard functions as the primary north-south corridor, with traffic volumes south of Lake Drive East exceeding those to the north by more than 1.5 times, despite the southern segment being narrower. Notable traffic also originates from the Business Access west of Great Plains Boulevard and from Lake Drive East, and nearby land uses contribute to increased intersection demand, with PM peak volumes slightly higher than AM peaks across all approaches. With schools in session, St. Hubert Catholic School, located south of Great Plains Boulevard and east of Market Boulevard, will further contribute to this demand. 179 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 4 Table 2: Existing Turning Movements from July 2025 Traffic Counts Consistent with seasonal factors that contribute to traffic variations throughout the year, the recorded ADT volumes were approximately 33% lower than the AADT counts documented in the MnDOT Traffic Mapping Application for Great Plains Boulevard. NB SB EB WB Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT AM PEAK HOUR (8:00 AM – 9:00 AM) 7 81 102 94 48 47 30 4 9 64 13 70 PM PEAK HOUR (4:30 PM – 5:30 PM) 6 125 82 94 111 129 93 11 16 95 27 68 SAT PEAK HOUR (11:30 AM -12:30 PM) 6 120 39 61 67 110 72 19 16 47 24 49 Table 2 summarizes the peak-hour volumes for each approach and illustrates the movements of vehicles at each leg of the intersection. High volumes were observed in the NB through movement, EB left turn, and WB right turn, indicating strong traffic flow towards TH 5 and Great Plains Boulevard. Additionally, a notable number of vehicles approaching from TH 5 make SB right turns, likely serving trips to nearby commercial destinations, including restaurants and retail establishments. Overall, traffic is relatively balanced between the several movements. CRASH DATA Crash data for the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Drive East was collected for the past five years, spanning 2021 through January 2025. During this period, a total of six crashes were reported, involving twelve vehicles. Among these incidents, three were angle-type crashes, two occurred during left- turn maneuvers, and the most recent recorded in June 2025 involved a side swipe collision and illustrations are provided in the Appendix B. The primary causes of crashes at the intersection appear to be failure to yield the right of way, driver distraction, and limited visibility due to sun glare or windshield obstruction. In all the reviewed cases, drivers frequently reported that they “didn’t see the other vehicle,” indicating a common issue of inadequate visual detection. Drivers reactions are as follows, in Case 1, both drivers failed to notice oncoming traffic: in Case 2, the driver turning left did not see the through vehicle; in Case 3, the northbound driver did not see a vehicle already turning left; in Case 4, the southbound driver on Great Plains Boulevard lost control of the vehicle and collided with another; and in Case 5, a distracted driver using an electronic device who failed to yield to northbound traffic on Great Plains Boulevard. These responses suggest that a combination of inattention, or misjudgment, careless operations and environmental conditions like sun glare contributed to the incidents. The crash data analysis indicates that incidents were distributed across various days of the week and occurred at different times of day, showing no consistent pattern related to time or weekday. The crashes were recorded in July (2), December (2), and the remaining two in October and November, suggesting no strong seasonal trend. Of the six crashes, five resulted in property damage only, while one involved a minor injury. Most crashes (five) occurred during clear weather conditions, with only one happening during snowfall. In terms of lighting, four crashes occurred during daylight and two during sunset. The highest proportion of the drivers involved were aged 65–74, followed by those in the 35–54 age group, and most were reported to be in normal physical condition at the time of the incidents. These findings indicate that intersection geometry or design is unlikely to be a major contributing factor. 180 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 5 Table 3: Historical Average Daily Traffic Future Roadway Characteristics In order to establish valid capacity analysis results, it is important to consider any known planned roadway improvements that may occur in the future on the surrounding roadway network. Great Plains Boulevard between Lake Drive E and TH 5 is anticipated to be rehabilitated in 2026. Improvements are not anticipated to increase roadway capacity. Similarly, the roadway improvements included in the Lake Drive E roadway rehabilitation project are also not anticipated to increase roadway capacity. No other roadway projects in the area are planned. To analyze future roadway conditions and project traffic volumes, growth factors were determined based on historical trends and local assumptions. Traffic volumes on Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Drive East in Chanhassen have shown fluctuations over the past two decades rather than grown steadily, and with the area’s low potential for significant redevelopment or residential density changes, future traffic growth is expected to remain minimal. Year AADT Lake Dr E Annual Average Growth Rate (%) Lake Dr E AADT Great Plains Blvd Annual Average Growth Rate (%) Great Plains Blvd 2005 5000 6500 2007 5400 4 6600 1 2009 5600 2 4900 -14 2011 4350 -12 5100 2 2013 3700 -8 10800 46 2015 3850 2 9600 -6 2017 4300 6 6700 -16 2019 4400 1 8400 12 2021 3173 -15 7111 -8 2024 3295 1 7234 0.5 Between 2005 and 2024, Lake Drive East experienced a steady decline in AADT, decreasing from 5,000 vehicles in 2005 to 3,295 in 2024, reflecting a consistent downward trend over nearly two decades. This suggests reduced traffic demand on this corridor. Meanwhile, Great Plains Boulevard showed more variability, with AADT increasing from 6,500 in 2005 to a peak of 10,800 in 2013, followed by a gradual decrease and stabilization around 7,234 vehicles by 2024. These contrasting trends indicate a sustained reduction in traffic volumes on Lake Drive East, while Great Plains Boulevard has experienced fluctuating but more stable traffic levels in recent years as shown in the Table 3. 181 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 6 Table 4: 2025 Traffic Volume at Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E (Adjusted Seasonal Variation) Table 4 presents the traffic counts collected in July 2025 with a seasonal adjustment factor applied to Great Plains Boulevard. The field survey recorded 5,606 vehicles on Great Plains Boulevard and 3,654 vehicles on Lake Drive East and the Business Access approach. When compared to MnDOT’s Traffic Mapping Application data, counts for Great Plains Boulevard were approximately 33% lower than the mapped values. This variation can be attributed to factors such as seasonal traffic fluctuations, day-of- week and time-of-day effects, and local conditions like construction activity or changes in travel demand. NB SB EB WB Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT AM PEAK HOUR (8:00 AM – 9:00 AM) 9 108 136 125 64 62 30 4 9 64 13 70 PM PEAK HOUR (4:30 PM – 5:30 PM) 8 166 109 125 148 172 93 11 16 95 27 68 SATPEAKHOUR (11:30 AM -12:30 PM) 8 160 52 81 89 146 72 19 16 47 24 49 To normalize these differences and better represent annual average daily traffic (AADT), adjustment factor of 1.33 was applied to Great Plains Boulevard approach traffic. These adjustments align short- term count data with annualized volumes reported by MnDOT, striving for consistency and accuracy for subsequent traffic analysis and design considerations. Figure 4 illustrates this comparison between MnDOT’s 2024 data, field traffic counts and adjusted traffic counts. Figure 3: Historical Traffic Data 182 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 7 Table 5: 2045 Future Traffic Volumes at Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E (0.5% Growth Rate) Although Chanhassen continues to experience steady development, recent traffic trends suggest stabilization rather than significant growth in vehicular demand. For Lake Drive East, long-term patterns indicate a decline in traffic volumes over the past decade, signaling minimal future increases. However, likely redevelopment on the northeast quadrant of the intersection could introduce additional traffic to the area. While the scale of the increase depends on the nature of future land uses, these potential trips should be considered in future traffic evaluations and intersection planning. The proposed closure of the existing driveway is expected to redirect existing site traffic to the Lake Drive driveway with minimal impact on overall traffic volumes. A conservative annual growth rate of 0.5% has been applied to both Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard. For Lake Drive East, this accounts for redevelopment on the northeast quadrant of the intersection while reflecting overall traffic stabilization along the corridor. Applying the same rate to Great Plains Boulevard reflects modest anticipated growth while maintaining consistency in the city’s planning approach. This approach aligns with the city’s emphasis on maintaining a balanced, multimodal transportation network and ensures that future traffic projections remain realistic and sustainable. The design horizon considers a 20-year period, targeting the year 2045 as shown in Table 5. NB SB EB WB Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT AM PEAK HOUR (8:00 AM – 9:00 AM) 10 119 150 138 71 69 30 4 9 71 14 77 PM PEAK HOUR (4:30 PM – 5:30 PM) 9 183 120 138 163 190 93 11 16 105 30 75 SAT PEAK HOUR (11:30 AM -12:30 PM) 9 177 57 89 98 161 72 19 16 52 27 54 Figure 4: Traffic Data Sources 183 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 8 Analysis of Alternatives The alternatives evaluated for the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Drive E are: 1. Two-Way Stop Control, the existing intersection control 2. All-Way Stop Control 3. Traffic Signal Control 4. Roundabout Crash, warrant, and capacity analyses are provided for the intersection and the respective intersection control alternative when applicable. 1. Two-Way Stop 2. All-Way Stop 3. Traffic Signal 4. Roundabout 184 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 9 Table 6: Crash Analysis Summary CRASH ANALYSIS The intersection experiences an average daily traffic of about 11,382 entering vehicles, translating to roughly 4.1 million entering vehicles (MEV) per year based on collected data. Crash analysis results, including intersection crash rates by control type from MnDOT’s Traffic Safety Fundamentals Handbook (2015), are shown in Table 6. These rates were applied to the adjusted total entering traffic at the Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Drive East intersection, with the outcomes summarized in the same table. Intersection Control Alternative Intersection Control Type MnDOT Average Crash Rate (Crashes/MEV) * # of Anticipated Crashes at Studied Intersection per Year Existing Two-Way Stop Control MnDOT Average, 0.18 Current Rate at Intersection, 0.3 MnDOT Average, 0.7 Current Rate at Intersection, 1.5 2 All-Way Stop Control 0.35 1.4 3 Traffic Signal Control 0.54 2.2 4 Roundabout 0.3 1.2 *Average Crash Rates are obtained from 2015 MnDOT Traffic Safety Fundamentals Handbook The intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Drive East has experienced a crash rate of 1.5 crashes per year, or 0.3 crashes per MEV, which is about 50% greater than the MnDOT average crash rate of 0.18 for intersections with similar traffic control. This higher than average crash rate suggests safety concerns, possibly related to operational or geometric factors such as limited sight distance, gap acceptance issues, or increased traffic demand. Modifying the intersection type to either all-way stop control or roundabout control can address these concerns. Although crash rates are typically lowest at two-way stop controlled intersections, the crashes that do occur are often angle-type crashes occurring at higher speeds, which can result in higher severity crashes such as major injury and fatal crashes. According to the Highway Safety Manual, introducing stop signs to convert a two-way stop control intersection to all-way stop control can reduce total number of crashes by 70%, with angle-type crashes experiencing the largest reduction, 75%. Converting to a roundabout type intersection would have a similar impact as converting to all-way stop control. According to the Highway Safety Manual, converting from a two-way stop control to a roundabout can reduce the intersection crash rate by about 40%, with injury related crashes experiencing the largest reduction, 80%. WARRANT ANALYSIS A warrant analysis was performed for traffic signal control at the intersection in accordance with the 2024 MnMUTCD. Additionally, a warrant analysis was performed for all-way stop control at the intersection. The traffic data collected in the July 2025 traffic count was adjusted for the effects of seasonality, a growth rate of 0.5% on both Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard and was used to conduct the warrant analyses. Two-Way Stop Control Delay analysis of a two-way stop controlled intersection is required for the multi-way stop control warrant analysis. Generally, two-way stop control is considered the “base” alternative. If a traffic signal, all-way stop, or roundabout are not warranted or justified, then two-way stop control would be justified. 185 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 10 Warrant analyses were conducted to determine the need for left- and right-turn bays at a two-way stop controlled intersection. Using peak hour volumes for the existing and future traffic conditions, the analysis concluded that under Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC), left-turn lanes are warranted to accommodate turning vehicles and minimize delays for through traffic. Turn warrants are provided in Appendix C. However, the potential for long delays in the future highlights the limitations of the existing two-way stop control at this intersection. Given the anticipated future traffic volumes and ongoing restricted sight distance issues, two-way stop control may not be adequate to ensure safe and efficient traffic operations. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct an All-Way Stop Control warrant analysis. All-Way Stop Control A multi-way stop control warrant analysis was conducted for the studied intersection, and it was met based on the forecasted traffic conditions. Although Conditions A and B were not satisfied, the intersection meets the volume and delay criteria, which requires major street traffic volumes of 300 or more vehicles and minor street volumes of 200 or more vehicles during any 8 -hour period on an average day. Additionally, the minor street traffic would need to experience delays of 30 seconds or more per vehicle. In this case, the roadways meet the volume thresholds for both the existing and future conditions. Although the delay threshold is not met in the existing condition, it is met in the future condition, warranting the implementation of all-way stop control. In the future PM scenario, where vehicles might experience greater than a 30 -second delay during peak hours, only eastbound and westbound drivers would be affected. For these drivers, however, installing a multi-way stop control would enhance their experience by reducing average delay. The multi-way stop warrant analysis details are provided in Appendix C for reference. Traffic Signal A traffic signal warrant analysis was conducted for the intersection, utilizing forecasting traffic volumes that were first adjusted to account for seasonal variations and projected growth to the design year of 2045. For Great Plains Boulevard, a minimum of two approach lanes were incorporated in the analysis to accurately reflect the intersection’s operational characteristics. For Lake Drive East and the Business Access, one approach lane was assumed. The evaluation encompassed all nine traffic signal warrants as outlined in the MnMUTCD. Each warrant was systematically assessed to determine its applicability to the intersection’s traffic conditions. Table 7 presents a detailed summary of the warrants, indicating whether each criterion was met, along with pertinent observations and considerations. The complete traffic signal warrant analysis including detailed calculations, assumptions, and data sources are provided in Appendix C. The traffic signal warrant analysis for the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Drive East, projected for 2025, indicates that none of the MUTCD volume-based warrants are satisfied. • The intersection does not meet the minimum thresholds for eight-hour, or four-hour volumes. • Pedestrian volumes were 10 in the AM peak hour and 5 in the PM peak hour, based on the collected turning movements. • Warrants related to coordinated signal systems, crash experience, and roadway network, were not met. Based on the results, installation of a traffic signal is neither warranted nor justified under current or projected conditions. Alternative traffic control strategies should be evaluated to enhance safety and operational efficiency at this intersection. 186 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 11 Table 7: Signal Warrant Summary WARRANT DESCRIPTION MET/ NOT MET (EXISTING) MET/ NOT MET (FUTURE) DESCRIPTION Warrant 1 A - Minimum Vehicular Volume NOT MET NOT MET Traffic volumes below MUTCD thresholds Warrant 1 B - Interruption Continuous Traffic NOT MET NOT MET Major street flow not significantly interrupted Warrant 2 - Four Hour Volumes NOT MET NOT MET Combined approach volumes do not meet criteria Warrant 3 - Peak Hour N/A N/A Area not impacted by generators with significant shift change or special traffic Warrant 4 - Pedestrian Volume NOT MET NOT MET Pedestrian activity is minimal Warrant 5 - School Crossing N/A N/A No school crossing near or at the intersection Warrant 6 - Coordinated Signal System NOT MET NOT MET Nearby signal provides for satisfactory platooning Warrant 7 - Crash Experience NOT MET NOT MET Crash history is below the warrant thresholds Warrant 8 - Roadway Network NOT MET NOT MET Not a critical intersection Warrant 9 – Intersection Near a Grade Crossing N/A N/A No grade crossing within proximity Roundabout There are no current warrants for the installation of roundabouts, and none were analyzed with this study; however, MnDOT currently recommends using either the multi-way stop warrant or traffic signal control warrant criteria for considering roundabouts. Since all-way stop control is warranted at the studied intersection for the future condition, a roundabout is also warranted in the future condition. CAPACITY ANALYSIS Capacity analysis was conducted for all four alternatives under both existing and future conditions. For the existing condition, each alternative was assessed using PM peak hour traffic based on the collected data. For the future condition, each alternative was analyzed using PM peak hour traffic volumes adjusted for seasonal variation and projected to the design year, applying a 0.5% annual growth rate for both the approaches. Synchro version 11 and Highway Capacity Software (HCS) 2025 were used to evaluate the alternatives for the intersection. Intersections are evaluated for Level of Service (LOS) and control delays. There are six LOS ratings, ranging from A to F. LOS A is the highest rating and represents an average vehicular delay of 10 seconds or less. LOS F is the lowest rating and represents average vehicle delays of greater than 80 seconds for signalized intersections and greater than 50 seconds for unsignalized intersections. Delays are represented as seconds per vehicle which are shown in the Tables 8 and 9. 187 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 12 Control Delay Per Vehicle (s) LOS ≤10 A 10 to 15 B 15 to 25 C 25 to 35 D 35 to 50 E >50 F Control Delay Per Vehicle (s) LOS ≤10 A 10 to 20 B 20 to 35 C 35 to 55 D 55 to 80 E >80 F Table 10: Existing (2025) Capacity Analysis Summary Along with evaluating the Level of Service (LOS), maximum queue lengths were analyzed for all four intersection control alternatives, with particular attention to the southbound lanes of Great Plains Boulevard; including the left-turn, thru, and right-turn movements and the eastbound lanes of Lake Dr East. This assessment aimed to ensure that projected vehicle volumes could be accommodated without obstructing traffic flow on TH 5 or the intersecting approaches, and without interfering with access to the adjacent driveway and parking areas along the eastbound leg. Summaries of vehicular queues are provided in Table 10, and detail reports are provided in Appendix D. Tables 10 and 11 summarize the results of the capacity analysis conducted for both existing and future (2045) traffic conditions across four types of traffic control: Traffic Signal, All-Way Stop, Two- Way Stop, and Roundabout. Detailed analysis is provided in Appendix D. PM PEAK HOUR Overall EB WB NB SB Traffic Signal LOS A B B A A Approach Delay 8.6 19.9 17.5 3.5 2.7 Queue 80 125 60 66 All-Way Stop LOS B B B B A Approach Delay 11 11.7 12.6 10.9 10 Queue 48 57 56 56 Two-Way Stop LOS N/A C C N/A N/A Approach Delay N/A 15.9 19.1 N/A N/A Queue 57 77 N/A 38 Roundabout LOS A A A A A Approach Delay 5.3 4.8 5.0 5.2 5.7 Queue 50 51 62 37 *The Traffic Signal alternative was analyzed using Synchro 11 modeling software, Percentile Delay methodology. All- Way Stop and Two-Way Stop were analyzed using Synchro 11 modeling software, HCM 6th Edition delay method. The Roundabout alternative was analyzed using HCS 2025’s Roundabout module. For the existing conditions, all control types demonstrate levels of service (LOS) of C or better. This indicates efficient traffic flow during the PM peak hour for most controls. Table 8: TWSC, AWSC, and Roundabout Level of Service Table 9: Signalized Intersection Level of Service 188 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 13 PM PEAK HOUR Overall EB WB NB SB Traffic Signal LOS A B B A A Approach Delay 8 18.5 18 3.8 3.7 Queue 76 158 84 81 All-Way Stop LOS B B C B B Approach Delay 13.5 13.5 15.8 14.2 12.1 Queue 41 70 68 61 Two-Way Stop LOS N/A C E N/A N/A Approach Delay N/A 24.6 47.3 N/A N/A Queue 59 97 22 53 Roundabout LOS A A A A A Approach Delay 6.8 5.5 5.7 6.7 7.7 Queue 49 55 87 82 *The Traffic Signal alternative was analyzed using Synchro 11 modeling software, Percentile Delay methodology. All-Way Stop and Two-Way Stop were analyzed using Synchro 11 modeling software, HCM 6th Edition delay method. The Roundabout alternative was analyzed using HCS 2025’s Roundabout module. Looking ahead to the future traffic conditions, the LOS varies more significantly, ranging from A to E depending on the control type. Both the Roundabout and Traffic Signal controls continue to perform well, as modeled, maintaining low delays and LOS A and B ratings, which reflects their capability to handle increased traffic volumes efficiently. A note: traffic operations is dependent on selected traffic signal phasing and timings for traffic signal control and selected roundabout diameter for roundabout control. With very small roundabout diameters, roundabouts operate more similarly to all -way stop control. Conversely, the Two-Way Stop control performs the poorest under future traffic demand, with LOS ratings dropping to C and E on side road approaches, indicating more pronounced delays and reduced operational effectiveness. This highlights that Two-Way Stop control may not be suitable long term and would likely lead to congestion, increased delays and crashes if retained. Although the southbound lanes offer a storage length that exceeds the maximum queue length to accommodate peak queues under the future conditions, installing a traffic signal at this intersection is not an ideal solution due to the relatively low expected traffic volumes. Additionally, the proximity of the city boundary and the amount of developed land in this area limits any significant future growth that could lead to traffic demand levels warranting signal control. Given these conditions, the intersection control options under consideration for future conditions are either a roundabout or all-way stop control. A roundabout would require careful design to ensure adequate operations. NCHRP 1043 recommends that private/commercial access points such as driveway on the eastbound should not tie directly into the roundabout, and alternatives should be considered before allowing direct access. However, the traffic volumes using the Business Access are sufficiently high that the approach operates similar to private or public street. If a roundabout is implemented at this location, the center should be placed so that vehicles backing out of parking spaces would not conflict with circulating roundabout traffic. Additionally, space for one to two vehicles should be incorporated so that vehicles attempting to exit the roundabout do not obstruct roundabout traffic while waiting for vehicle to reverse out of a parking space. Table 11: Future Year (2045) Capacity Analysis Summary 189 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 14 RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION Because the existing intersection is already controlled by Two-Way Stop signs, maintaining the current control or converting to All-Way Stop Control would not require acquiring additional right of way. Additionally, per GIS mapping of parcel data for Carver County, it appears there is enough space for traffic signal control equipment if the intersection were to be converted to traffic signal control. A mini-roundabout with a 90-foot inscribed circle diameter can also be accommodated within the existing intersection. If additional right-of-way on the east side to be acquired, a more traditionally-sized single-lane roundabout could also be considered. Showing conceptual layouts of a mini and traditional roundabout Exhibits are attached in the Appendix E. SIGHT DISTANCE Most of the crashes at this intersection are attributed to vision being obscured, followed by failure to yield the right-of-way. This indicates that visibility issues are impacting safety and overall operational performance. Sketches are provided in the Appendix F. At the two-way stop-controlled (TWSC) intersection, a building and trees along the west side of Great Plains Boulevard south of the intersection create visibility constraints for certain turning movements. Otherwise, sightlines are generally adequate. While current traffic volumes are low and impacts are minimal, future conditions with higher traffic could result in additional safety and operational concerns. At an all-way stop-controlled (AWSC) intersection, all vehicles would be required to stop before entering the intersection which can improve overall visibility and safety. Since all approaches are controlled, drivers can observe each approach clearly without significant obstructions in the sight triangles. This reduces uncertainty, and allows drivers to proceed in an orderly manner, leading to smoother operations at the intersection compared to a two-way stop-controlled scenario. For the roundabout alternative, vehicle speeds would be significantly reduced to approximately 15 MPH as drivers approach and navigate through the intersection. This lower operating speed enhances safety by minimizing crash severity and making sight distance requirements less critical compared to a two-way stop control. While a roundabout improves overall visibility and reduces conflict points, it does present some challenges at this location. The adjacent commercial driveway, which currently has perpendicular parking, would require partial removal of private parking to accommodate the roundabout design. Additionally, managing traffic flow from the driveway could be complex, particularly if vehicles attempt to merge into circulating traffic without sufficient gaps. This could lead to potential traffic accumulation or operational issues at peak times. Despite these considerations, the roundabout remains a feasible option for improving safety, provided that access management and parking adjustments are carefully addressed. COST Costs for roundabout construction can vary significantly. For planning purposes, to implement a full -sized roundabout at this intersection the estimated cost would be between $1 to $1.2 million. A substantial portion of this cost comes from tying the north leg into the existing pavement. The existing median will need to be reconstructed due to widening; the pavement along the proposed median alignment could be sawcut, followed by a mill-and-fill on the existing pavement to refresh the surface and match the designed roadway grade. For a mini roundabout, similar work would be required on the north leg, and the estimated cost savings compared to a full-sized roundabout could be approximately $250,000. To implement the All-Way Stop Control, two additional stop signs would need to be installed, as two are already present at the intersection. The estimated cost for adding these two new sign posts is approximately $1000, which is relatively low compared to other intersection control alternatives. Removal of pavement to reduce lanes and provide clarity to drivers navigating the intersection would be an added cost. 190 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 15 To right-size the intersection, several lanes would need to be removed. The southbound approach would need to be converted from a three-lane approach to a two-lane approach: a southbound left- turn only lane and a shared through-right lane. Additionally, the northbound approach would be converted from two approach lanes to a single left-through-right shared approach lane. Infrastructure changes for this geometric reconfiguration would require curb and gutter reconstruction, pavement removal, pedestrian cross walk painting and restoration of the boulevard area. Furthermore, the maintenance cost for an All-Way Stop Control is minimal, typically limited to periodic inspections, sign cleaning, and occasional replacement due to damage or wear. These maintenance activities are part of routine traffic control device upkeep and do not represent a significant ongoing expense for the agency. Lane reduction would reduce the amount of pavement requiring snow removal in the winter months; however, depending on the boulevard materials, increased vegetated surfaces in the boulevard may increase maintenance effort. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST ACCOMMODATIONS Bicycle and pedestrian volumes at the study intersection are generally low but consistent throughout the day, with peak bicycle activity occurring westbound during midday and peak pedestrian activity mainly on the north and west legs. The crosswalk across the north leg and the sidewalk along the east leg effectively support these movement patterns. Both modes were observed at multiple times beyond peak periods, indicating regular non-motorized use. Overall non-motorized volumes were 3 to 4 pedestrians and 1 to 2 bicyclists per hour based on the collected turning movements. Also, it was observed that westbound bicyclists traveling from the east often use the sidewalk and proceed through the intersection, while bicyclists on the other three legs ride on the roadway alongside motor vehicles, highlighting the value of dedicated on-street bicycle accommodations along Lake Drive East to encourage roadway use by bicyclists. MnDOT’s Bicycle Facility Design Manual recommends dedicated bike lanes or protected bike lanes where right-of-way allows, especially on busier or higher-speed roadways. For constrained spaces, shared lane markings can be used. On-street bicycle lanes would be an appropriate treatment for Lake Drive East, and a separated bike path would be appropriate for Great Plains Boulevard. All alternatives should include continuous pedestrian sidewalks to support safe and accessible travel. Although bike lanes are not required for rehabilitation type Minnesota State Aid projects and the decision for inclusion of bike lanes lie with the local jurisdiction. Incorporating dedicated bicycle facilities, particularly westbound, and pedestrian sidewalks in all design alternatives would align with best practices to accommodate all road users in urban environments. CRITERIA FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL MODIFICATION A threshold evaluation was conducted to determine the appropriate year for transitioning the intersection from Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) to All-Way Stop Control (AWSC), based on the projected traffic volume growth, anticipated delay, and MUTCD volume- and delay-based warrants. Based on available traffic data, MnMUTCD AWSC warrant volume criteria is satisfied for both the existing and the future conditions. By modeling the existing and proposed traffic conditions assuming TWSC, MnMUTCD AWSC delay criteria would be satisfied around 2033. 191 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 16 Table 12: Alternative Intersection Control Analysis Summary Summary From the traffic analysis presented in this report, the following table summarizes the findings. Existing Traffic Future Traffic Alternative Crash Analysis Warrant Analysis Capacity Analysis Warrant Analysis Capacity Analysis Sight Distance Cost Two-Way Stop 1 crash per year N/A Acceptable N/A Unacceptable Obstructed $ All-Way Stop 1 crash per year Not Warranted Acceptable Warranted Acceptable Unobstructed $$ Traffic Signal 2 crashes per year Not Warranted Acceptable Not Warranted Acceptable N/A $$$$ Roundabout 1 crash per year Not Warranted Acceptable Warranted Acceptable Unobstructed $$$, Mini Roundabout $$$$, Traditional Roundabout Traffic Signal Installing signalized control at this intersection would improve operations during peak hours; however, the existing and future traffic volumes do not justify the need for a signal. A traffic signal is not warranted and would incur excess initial construction and ongoing maintenance costs. During off-peak hours, when traffic is minimal, vehicles on the minor approach would still be required to stop or wait unnecessarily, resulting in increased delay and reduced efficiency. Roundabout A roundabout generally performs well at this intersection. Although a traditionally sized roundabout would require right-of-way acquisition, an appropriately designed roundabout, with space to provide a buffer between the roundabout’s circulating lane and parked vehicles, is a warranted and feasible solution. Alternatively, a mini-roundabout would likely not require right-of-way acquisition and can be much less costly than a traditionally-sized single lane roundabout. Thoughtful design would still be required for a mini-roundabout to prevent conflicts with the Business Access’s parking area. Stop Control An all-way stop control is a suitable option as it offers levels of service B or better, maximized sight distance, and low maintenance. However, the current roadway configuration would need adjustment. The southbound approach presently includes three lanes: right-turn, through, and left-turn movements. If the configuration remains unchanged, all three vehicles in these lanes would need to stop and determine the order of movement, which can lead to confusion and inefficiency. For this reason, it is generally not ideal to maintain three lanes on one or more approaches at an all -way stop- controlled intersection. Based on the study findings, the intersection can operate efficiently under any control type for the next 8 years. Therefore, there is no immediate need to implement major changes; however, changes may be implemented as part of the upcoming rehabilitation project, if desired. Considering the low anticipated annual traffic growth rate of 0.5%, the existing configuration will be able to accommodate future traffic demand for at least the next 8 years, as determined in threshold criteria, which analyzed the threshold point for capacity improvements. 192 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 17 All-way stop control is recommended at the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Drive East to balance operational efficiency, sight distance needs, safety, right-of-way impacts, and cost. Additionally, all-way stop control is warranted in approximately 8 years. For all-way stop control, reducing the southbound approach to two southbound lanes, a left -turn only lane and a shared through-right lane is recommended. Additionally, reducing the northbound approach to one northbound lane, a single shared left-through-right lane, is recommended. These changes were modeled, and results are summarized in Table 13 and detailed analysis reports are provided in Appendix G. Table 13: Recommendations (2045) Analysis Summary PM PEAK HOUR Overall EB WB NB SB All-Way Stop LOS C B B C C Approach Delay 15.3 12.2 13.8 15.9 18.1 Queue 46 69 88 59 If desired, these changes may be piloted during the spring or early summer for a short period, such as 1-2 months. To pilot these geometric changes prior to permanent implementation, movable concrete barrier or similar barricades may be installed in the existing southbound right-turn lane to close the lane. The northbound approach may be restriped to clearly indicate that the right -lane is not to be used for vehicular travel. A barricade may also be installed if non- compliance is apparent. These pilot measures can be implemented to help convince the travelling public that impacts to adjacent intersections are not anticipated; however, if for any reason the City of Chanhassen chooses to abandon modification to all - way stop control, the temporary measures may be removed. 193 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report- Chanhassen, MN Appendix A Appendix A: Traffic Counts A-1 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS A-2 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC REPORTS 194 Type of peak hour beingreported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume Page 1 of 1 LOCATION: Great Plains Blvd -- Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140001 CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Tue, Jul 1 2025 Peak-Hour: 8:00 AM -- 9:00 AM 189 181 1.1 2.2 Peak 15-Min: 8:00 AM -- 8:15 AM 47 48 94 0 2.1 1.1 67 30 70 147 0 0 1.4 1.4 4 0.92 13 0 0 43 9 64 200 0 0 1.6 0.5 7 81 102 0 3.7 0 121 190 1.7 1.6 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-MinCount Be Period At ginning Great Plains Blvd Left (Northbound) Great Plains Blvd (Southbound) Lake Dr E (Eastbound) Lake Dr E (Westbound) Total Hourl Total Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 0 2 8 0 0 2 8 0 2 2 8 0 1 5 20 0 2 10 14 0 1 10 33 0 8 4 0 0 17 6 4 0 11 9 6 0 22 18 5 0 22 4 5 0 28 13 9 0 6 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 2 0 6 0 9 0 11 6 4 0 18 3 7 0 14 0 11 0 20 2 7 0 37 56 59 107 84 124 259 306 374 8:00 AM 5 31 30 0 19 10 10 0 7 2 6 0 13 3 18 0 154 469 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 1 12 24 0 0 17 22 0 1 21 26 0 24 11 14 0 27 8 9 0 24 19 14 0 8 1 1 0 8 1 1 0 7 0 1 0 16 2 25 0 16 1 18 0 19 7 9 0 139 128 148 501 545 569 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 2 13 19 0 0 16 10 0 21 13 23 0 17 15 14 0 14 3 1 0 11 2 0 0 21 4 20 0 17 1 10 0 154 113 569 543 Peak 15-Min Flowrates Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles HeavyTrucks Buses Pedestrians Bicycles Scooters 20 124 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 40 40 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 28 8 24 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 52 12 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 616 0 8 0 Comments: Report generated on 7/16/2025 12:49 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 195 Type of peak hour beingreported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume Page 1 of 1 LOCATION: Great Plains Blvd -- Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140002 CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Tue, Jul 1 2025 Peak-Hour: 4:30 PM -- 5:30 PM 334 286 0 0.3 Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM 129 111 94 0 0 0 162 93 68 190 0 0 0 0 11 0.92 27 0 0 120 16 95 187 0 0 0 2.1 6 125 82 0 0.8 4.9 222 213 0 2.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-MinCount Be Period At ginning Great Plains Blvd Left (Northbound) Great Plains Blvd (Southbound) Lake Dr E (Eastbound) Lake Dr E (Westbound) Total Hourl Total Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 1 24 19 0 3 24 21 0 1 28 13 0 5 26 20 0 21 24 33 0 27 17 14 0 18 24 23 1 17 32 32 0 13 6 4 0 19 4 6 0 24 3 3 0 17 7 3 0 26 8 20 0 20 3 15 0 28 7 25 0 28 9 14 0 199 173 198 210 780 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 2 21 17 0 2 42 23 0 25 32 39 0 15 20 30 0 17 2 4 0 21 3 1 0 13 4 15 0 29 6 20 0 191 212 772 811 5:00 PM 1 32 21 0 35 30 29 0 24 4 3 0 26 9 18 0 232 845 5:15 PM 1 30 21 0 19 29 31 0 31 2 8 0 27 8 15 0 222 857 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 6:00 PM 6:15 PM 0 30 7 0 2 23 19 0 3 27 13 0 2 18 13 0 18 28 30 0 16 24 32 0 16 25 28 0 18 19 29 1 14 3 2 0 13 4 2 0 17 3 6 0 33 4 5 0 20 2 16 0 14 3 12 0 17 8 13 0 10 3 16 0 170 164 176 171 836 788 732 681 Peak 15-Min Flowrates Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles HeavyTrucks Buses Pedestrians Bicycles Scooters 4 128 84 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 140 120 116 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 16 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 36 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 928 4 0 0 Comments: Report generated on 7/16/2025 12:49 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 196 Type of peak hour beingreported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume Page 1 of 1 LOCATION: Great Plains Blvd -- Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140003 CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Sat, Jul 12 2025 Peak-Hour: 11:30 AM -- 12:30 PM 238 241 0 0.4 Peak 15-Min: 11:45 AM -- 12:00 PM 110 67 61 0 0 0 140 72 49 120 0 1.4 0 0 19 0.98 24 0 0 107 16 47 119 0.9 0 0 0 6 120 39 0 0 0 130 165 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-MinCount Be Period At ginning Great Plains Blvd Left (Northbound) Great Plains Blvd (Southbound) Lake Dr E (Eastbound) Lake Dr E (Westbound) Total Hourl Total Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 0 18 12 0 3 27 16 0 14 22 17 1 10 21 37 0 10 2 2 0 6 1 0 0 16 8 10 0 8 4 15 0 132 148 11:30 AM 2 31 9 0 13 17 29 0 21 4 3 0 11 5 9 0 154 11:45 AM 1 22 8 0 16 21 33 0 14 7 2 0 14 9 13 0 160 594 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 1 40 15 0 2 27 7 0 19 10 23 0 13 19 25 0 17 4 10 0 20 4 1 0 6 4 11 0 16 6 16 0 160 156 622 630 12:30 PM 12:45 PM 1:00 PM 1:15 PM 1:30 PM 1:45 PM 2 24 13 0 2 17 11 0 0 14 11 0 0 21 10 0 0 15 8 0 0 13 6 0 10 11 20 1 16 13 28 0 32 17 36 0 7 14 34 0 17 24 27 0 11 12 23 0 18 7 2 0 22 2 3 0 15 7 4 0 13 2 0 0 23 5 1 0 26 4 2 0 10 4 17 0 9 4 8 0 9 8 13 0 9 5 12 0 8 6 8 0 10 2 11 0 139 135 166 127 142 120 615 590 596 567 570 555 Peak 15-Min Flowrates Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles HeavyTrucks Buses Pedestrians Bicycles Scooters 4 88 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 84 132 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 28 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 36 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 640 0 0 12 Comments: Report generated on 7/16/2025 12:49 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 197 Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data Page 1 of 1 LOCATION: Great Plains Blvd north of Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140004 SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: NB CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 01:00 AM 02:00 AM 03:00 AM 04:00 AM 05:00 AM 06:00 AM 07:00 AM 08:00 AM 09:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 01:00 PM 02:00 PM 03:00 PM 04:00 PM 05:00 PM 06:00 PM 07:00 PM 08:00 PM 09:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 6 7 2 4 2 2 1 1 8 9 12 12 45 59 107 89 124 126 127 123 128 137 145 155 181 158 130 128 147 148 195 184 216 197 213 197 153 148 97 99 54 64 50 41 12 11 9 9 7 3 2 1 9 12 52 98 125 125 133 150 170 129 148 190 207 205 151 98 59 46 12 9 7 3 2 1 9 12 52 98 125 125 133 150 170 129 148 190 207 205 151 98 59 46 12 9 Day Total 2164 2108 2141 2141 %Weekday Average 101.1% 98.5% %Week Average 101.1% 98.5% 100% AMPeak Volume 11:00 AM 11:00 AM 145 155 11:00 AM 150 11:00 AM 150 PMPeak Volume 4:00 PM 4:00 PM 216 197 4:00 PM 207 4:00 PM 207 Comments: Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 198 Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data Page 1 of 1 LOCATION: Great Plains Blvd north of Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140004 SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: NB, SB CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 01:00 AM 02:00 AM 03:00 AM 04:00 AM 05:00 AM 06:00 AM 07:00 AM 08:00 AM 09:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 01:00 PM 02:00 PM 03:00 PM 04:00 PM 05:00 PM 06:00 PM 07:00 PM 08:00 PM 09:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 9 10 5 7 2 4 4 2 12 12 32 27 76 115 214 232 314 275 261 263 284 293 318 340 371 374 297 275 318 324 376 368 416 409 400 404 304 317 234 222 124 154 87 83 24 22 18 11 10 6 3 3 12 30 96 223 295 262 289 329 373 286 321 372 413 402 311 228 139 85 23 15 10 6 3 3 12 30 96 223 295 262 289 329 373 286 321 372 413 402 311 228 139 85 23 15 Day Total 4500 4543 4526 4526 % Weekday Average 99.4% 100.4% % Week Average 99.4% 100.4% 100% AMPeak Volume 11:00 AM 11:00 AM 318 340 11:00 AM 329 11:00 AM 329 PMPeak Volume 4:00 PM 4:00 PM 416 409 4:00 PM 413 4:00 PM 413 Comments: Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 199 Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data Page 1 of 1 LOCATION: Great Plains Blvd north of Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140004 SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: SB CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 01:00 AM 02:00 AM 03:00 AM 04:00 AM 05:00 AM 06:00 AM 07:00 AM 08:00 AM 09:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 01:00 PM 02:00 PM 03:00 PM 04:00 PM 05:00 PM 06:00 PM 07:00 PM 08:00 PM 09:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 3 3 3 3 0 2 3 1 4 3 20 15 31 56 107 143 190 149 134 140 156 156 173 185 190 216 167 147 171 176 181 184 200 212 187 207 151 169 137 123 70 90 37 42 12 11 9 2 3 3 1 2 4 18 44 125 170 137 156 179 203 157 174 183 206 197 160 130 80 40 12 6 3 3 1 2 4 18 44 125 170 137 156 179 203 157 174 183 206 197 160 130 80 40 12 6 Day Total 2336 2435 2390 2390 % Weekday Average 97.7% 101.9% % Week Average 97.7% 101.9% 100% AMPeak Volume 8:00 AM 11:00 AM 190 185 11:00 AM 179 11:00 AM 179 PMPeak Volume 4:00 PM 12:00 PM 200 216 4:00 PM 206 4:00 PM 206 Comments: Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 200 Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data Page 1 of 1 LOCATION: Lake Dr E east of Great Plains Blvd/Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140005 SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 01:00 AM 02:00 AM 03:00 AM 04:00 AM 05:00 AM 06:00 AM 07:00 AM 08:00 AM 09:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 01:00 PM 02:00 PM 03:00 PM 04:00 PM 05:00 PM 06:00 PM 07:00 PM 08:00 PM 09:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 3 2 17 14 17 31 41 37 66 46 85 74 88 87 138 150 167 153 129 113 144 114 115 131 161 131 149 145 140 134 93 103 57 57 46 46 26 8 3 2 0 1 0 1 3 16 24 39 56 80 88 144 160 121 129 123 146 147 137 98 57 46 17 3 0 1 0 1 3 16 24 39 56 80 88 144 160 121 129 123 146 147 137 98 57 46 17 3 Day Total 1687 1579 1636 1636 % Weekday Average 103.1% 96.5% % Week Average 103.1% 96.5% 100% AMPeak Volume 11:00 AM 11:00 AM 138 150 11:00 AM 144 11:00 AM 144 PMPeak Volume 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 167 153 12:00 PM 160 12:00 PM 160 Comments: Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 201 Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data Page 1 of 1 LOCATION: Lake Dr E east of Great Plains Blvd/Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140005 SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 01:00 AM 02:00 AM 03:00 AM 04:00 AM 05:00 AM 06:00 AM 07:00 AM 08:00 AM 09:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 01:00 PM 02:00 PM 03:00 PM 04:00 PM 05:00 PM 06:00 PM 07:00 PM 08:00 PM 09:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 3 1 1 2 0 2 2 0 3 3 17 14 29 42 52 58 110 89 135 124 165 149 218 236 274 247 237 208 246 192 218 217 265 230 260 237 253 242 179 194 112 139 97 99 56 27 12 8 2 2 1 1 3 16 36 55 100 130 157 227 261 223 219 218 248 249 248 187 126 98 42 10 2 2 1 1 3 16 36 55 100 130 157 227 261 223 219 218 248 249 248 187 126 98 42 10 Day Total 2944 2760 2859 2859 % Weekday Average 103% 96.5% % Week Average 103% 96.5% 100% AMPeak Volume 11:00 AM 11:00 AM 218 236 11:00 AM 227 11:00 AM 227 PMPeak Volume 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 274 247 12:00 PM 261 12:00 PM 261 Comments: Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 202 Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data Page 1 of 1 LOCATION: Lake Dr E east of Great Plains Blvd/Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140005 SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 01:00 AM 02:00 AM 03:00 AM 04:00 AM 05:00 AM 06:00 AM 07:00 AM 08:00 AM 09:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 01:00 PM 02:00 PM 03:00 PM 04:00 PM 05:00 PM 06:00 PM 07:00 PM 08:00 PM 09:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 3 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 12 11 11 21 44 43 50 50 77 62 80 86 107 94 108 95 102 78 103 86 104 99 111 92 113 108 86 91 55 82 51 53 30 19 9 6 2 1 1 0 1 0 12 16 44 50 70 83 101 102 90 95 102 102 111 89 69 52 25 8 2 1 1 0 1 0 12 16 44 50 70 83 101 102 90 95 102 102 111 89 69 52 25 8 Day Total 1257 1181 1226 1226 % Weekday Average 102.5% 96.3% % Week Average 102.5% 96.3% 100% AMPeak Volume 11:00 AM 11:00 AM 80 86 11:00 AM 83 11:00 AM 83 PMPeak Volume 6:00 PM 6:00 PM 113 108 6:00 PM 111 6:00 PM 111 Comments: Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 203 Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data Page 1 of 1 LOCATION: Business Access west of Great Plains Blvd/Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140006 SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 01:00 AM 02:00 AM 03:00 AM 04:00 AM 05:00 AM 06:00 AM 07:00 AM 08:00 AM 09:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 01:00 PM 02:00 PM 03:00 PM 04:00 PM 05:00 PM 06:00 PM 07:00 PM 08:00 PM 09:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 7 7 1 1 2 3 0 0 4 3 11 10 40 52 102 95 149 158 135 117 126 145 167 186 184 168 150 131 128 151 183 160 197 196 169 161 131 128 82 85 68 57 55 41 21 13 15 10 7 1 3 0 4 11 46 99 154 126 136 177 176 141 140 172 197 165 130 84 63 48 17 13 7 1 3 0 4 11 46 99 154 126 136 177 176 141 140 172 197 165 130 84 63 48 17 13 Day Total 2127 2078 2110 2110 % Weekday Average 100.8% 98.5% % Week Average 100.8% 98.5% 100% AMPeak Volume 11:00 AM 11:00 AM 167 186 11:00 AM 177 11:00 AM 177 PMPeak Volume 4:00 PM 4:00 PM 197 196 4:00 PM 197 4:00 PM 197 Comments: Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 204 Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data Page 1 of 1 LOCATION: Business Access west of Great Plains Blvd/Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140006 SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 01:00 AM 02:00 AM 03:00 AM 04:00 AM 05:00 AM 06:00 AM 07:00 AM 08:00 AM 09:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 01:00 PM 02:00 PM 03:00 PM 04:00 PM 05:00 PM 06:00 PM 07:00 PM 08:00 PM 09:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12 13 2 3 2 5 2 1 13 8 33 24 96 129 265 264 349 347 271 273 266 295 321 367 398 368 306 295 285 300 354 340 359 362 339 336 264 271 201 173 120 135 101 92 42 36 26 17 13 3 4 2 11 29 113 265 348 272 281 344 383 301 293 347 361 338 268 187 128 97 39 22 13 3 4 2 11 29 113 265 348 272 281 344 383 301 293 347 361 338 268 187 128 97 39 22 Day Total 4427 4454 4449 4449 % Weekday Average 99.5% 100.1% % Week Average 99.5% 100.1% 100% AMPeak Volume 8:00 AM 11:00 AM 349 367 8:00 AM 348 8:00 AM 348 PMPeak Volume 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 398 368 12:00 PM 383 12:00 PM 383 Comments: Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 205 Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data Page 1 of 1 LOCATION: Business Access west of Great Plains Blvd/Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140006 SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 01:00 AM 02:00 AM 03:00 AM 04:00 AM 05:00 AM 06:00 AM 07:00 AM 08:00 AM 09:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 01:00 PM 02:00 PM 03:00 PM 04:00 PM 05:00 PM 06:00 PM 07:00 PM 08:00 PM 09:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 5 6 1 2 0 2 2 1 9 5 22 14 56 77 163 169 200 189 136 156 140 150 154 181 214 200 156 164 157 149 171 180 162 166 170 175 133 143 119 88 52 78 46 51 21 23 11 7 6 2 1 2 7 18 67 166 195 146 145 168 207 160 153 176 164 173 138 104 65 49 22 9 6 2 1 2 7 18 67 166 195 146 145 168 207 160 153 176 164 173 138 104 65 49 22 9 Day Total 2300 2376 2343 2343 % Weekday Average 98.2% 101.4% % Week Average 98.2% 101.4% 100% AMPeak Volume 8:00 AM 8:00 AM 200 189 8:00 AM 195 8:00 AM 195 PMPeak Volume 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 214 200 12:00 PM 207 12:00 PM 207 Comments: Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 206 Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data Page 1 of 1 LOCATION: Lake Dr E south of Business Acc/Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140007 SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: NB CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 01:00 AM 02:00 AM 03:00 AM 04:00 AM 05:00 AM 06:00 AM 07:00 AM 08:00 AM 09:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 01:00 PM 02:00 PM 03:00 PM 04:00 PM 05:00 PM 06:00 PM 07:00 PM 08:00 PM 09:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 3 5 1 3 1 0 3 1 12 11 27 20 66 74 152 130 189 184 204 210 209 221 260 285 334 306 255 255 288 242 274 312 307 279 321 313 264 243 186 181 98 120 81 79 38 18 5 10 4 2 1 2 12 24 70 141 187 207 215 273 320 255 265 293 293 317 254 184 109 80 28 8 4 2 1 2 12 24 70 141 187 207 215 273 320 255 265 293 293 317 254 184 109 80 28 8 Day Total 3578 3502 3544 3544 % Weekday Average 101% 98.8% % Week Average 101% 98.8% 100% AMPeak Volume 11:00 AM 11:00 AM 260 285 11:00 AM 273 11:00 AM 273 PMPeak Volume 12:00 PM 5:00 PM 334 313 12:00 PM 320 12:00 PM 320 Comments: Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 207 Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data Page 1 of 1 LOCATION: Lake Dr E south of Business Acc/Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140007 SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: NB, SB CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 01:00 AM 02:00 AM 03:00 AM 04:00 AM 05:00 AM 06:00 AM 07:00 AM 08:00 AM 09:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 01:00 PM 02:00 PM 03:00 PM 04:00 PM 05:00 PM 06:00 PM 07:00 PM 08:00 PM 09:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 8 8 4 4 2 3 4 1 12 13 34 25 97 100 213 224 371 357 379 374 421 431 503 541 587 579 520 478 529 478 534 559 576 571 577 569 497 466 368 371 226 270 163 156 80 37 20 20 8 4 3 3 13 30 99 219 364 377 426 522 583 499 504 547 574 573 482 370 248 160 59 20 8 4 3 3 13 30 99 219 364 377 426 522 583 499 504 547 574 573 482 370 248 160 59 20 Day Total 6725 6635 6687 6687 % Weekday Average 100.6% 99.2% % Week Average 100.6% 99.2% 100% AMPeak Volume 11:00 AM 11:00 AM 503 541 11:00 AM 522 11:00 AM 522 PMPeak Volume 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 587 579 12:00 PM 583 12:00 PM 583 Comments: Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 208 Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data Page 1 of 1 LOCATION: Lake Dr E south of Business Acc/Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140007 SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: SB CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 01:00 AM 02:00 AM 03:00 AM 04:00 AM 05:00 AM 06:00 AM 07:00 AM 08:00 AM 09:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 01:00 PM 02:00 PM 03:00 PM 04:00 PM 05:00 PM 06:00 PM 07:00 PM 08:00 PM 09:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 5 3 3 1 1 3 1 0 0 2 7 5 31 26 61 94 182 173 175 164 212 210 243 256 253 273 265 223 241 236 260 247 269 292 256 256 233 223 182 190 128 150 82 77 42 19 15 10 4 2 2 1 1 6 29 78 178 170 211 250 263 244 239 254 281 256 228 186 139 80 31 13 4 2 2 1 1 6 29 78 178 170 211 250 263 244 239 254 281 256 228 186 139 80 31 13 Day Total 3147 3133 3146 3146 % Weekday Average 100% 99.6% % Week Average 100% 99.6% 100% AMPeak Volume 11:00 AM 11:00 AM 243 256 11:00 AM 250 11:00 AM 250 PMPeak Volume 4:00 PM 4:00 PM 269 292 4:00 PM 281 4:00 PM 281 Comments: Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 209 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report- Chanhassen, MN Appendix B Appendix B: Illustrations of Crashes 210 Unit 1 was traveling northbound on Great Plains Boulevard with the right of way, approaching the intersection at Lake Drive East. Unit 2 stopped eastbound on Lake Drive East at the stop sign. The driver of Unit 2 did not see Unit 1 and proceeded into the intersection, resulting in a collision. Unit 1 struck Unit 2 within the intersection due to Unit 2 failing to yield the right of way. Unit 1 was exiting a commercial area on the west side of the intersection and initially came to a stop. The driver then proceeded into the intersection and struck the rear driver side of Unit 2, which was traveling northbound on Great Plains Boulevard. The impact caused Unit 2 to spin and collide with the rear wheel and partial fender of Unit 3, which was stopped at the stop sign westbound on Lake Drive East at Great Plains Boulevard. The driver of Unit 1 admitted to being on the phone at the time of the crash. 211 The driver of Unit 1 was traveling southbound on Great Plains Boulevard and attempted to make a left turn onto Lake Drive East to proceed eastbound. Unit 2 was traveling northbound on Great Plains Boulevard. As Unit 1 turned left, a collision occurred with Unit 2. The driver of Unit 1 stated that Unit 2 was not seen prior to initiating the turn. Unit 1 stopped at the stop sign at Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Drive East, intending to turn left (southbound) onto Great Plains Boulevard. Unit 2 was stopped at the stop sign at Pond Promenade and Great Plains Boulevard, intending to travel straight across the intersection onto Lake Drive East. Unit 2 proceeded into the intersection, and Unit 1 entered the intersection at the same time resulted in a collision. According to the statement from the driver of Unit 1, Unit 2 was not seen prior to entering the intersection. 212 Unit 1 was attempting to cross Great Plains Boulevard from Lake Drive East into a private business lot. Unit 1 did not see Unit 2 traveling southbound on Great Plains Boulevard. Unit 2 was unable to stop and struck Unit 1 on the rear passenger-side quarter panel. 213 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report- Chanhassen, MN Appendix C Appendix C: Warrant Analysis C-1 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS C-2 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 214 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Appendix C C-1 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Two-Way Left Turn Warrant Two-Way Right Turn Warrant Multi-Way Stop Warrant Traffic Signal Warrant 215 Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. Opposing Volume (VO), veh/h 2-lane roadway (English) INPUT Variable Value 800 700 Left-turn treatment warranted. 600 500 400 300 200 Left-turn treatment not 100 warranted. 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h 85th percentile speed, mph: 30 Percent of left-turns in advancing volume (VA), %: 28% Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: 334 Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: 207 OUTPUT Variable Value Limiting advancing volume (VA), veh/h: 339 Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: Left-turn treatment NOT warranted. CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Variable Value Average time for making left-turn, s: 3.0 Critical headway, s: 5.0 Average time for left-turn vehicle to clear the advancing lane, s: 1.9 216 Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Roadway geometry: 2-lane roadw ay Variable Value Major-road speed, mph: 30 Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: 334 Right-turn volume, veh/h: 129 OUTPUT Variable Value Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: 3855 Guidance for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway: Do NOT add right-turn bay. 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Right-Turn Volume, veh/h 217 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Multi-Way Stop Warrants Project Name Intersection Control Evaluation Project/File # 25-33064 Scenario Projected 2025 Intersection Information Major Street (N/S Road) Great Plains Boulevard Minor Street (E/W Road) Lake Dr East Analyzed with 2 or more approach lanes Analyzed with 1 Approach Lane Total Approach Volume 5987 vehicles Total Approach Volume 3384 vehicles Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied No high speed or isolated community reduction applied to the Multi-Way Stop Warrant thresholds. Condition A - Traffic Signal Warrant Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Criteria* Traffic Signal Warranted & Justified * Multi-way stop control may be used as an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. Condition B - Crash Experience Condition Satisfied? Not satisfied Required values reached for less than 4 correctable crashes Criteria - Crash Experience 5 or more correctable crashes in 12-month period Condition C - Intersection Volume & Delay Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Required values reached for 9 hours & 17.5 sec. average delay/veh Criteria - Major Street (veh/hr) 300 for any 8 hours of an average day Criteria - Minor Street (total vol-veh, ped, & bikes/hr) 200 for the same 8 hours of an average day Criteria - Delay (average sec/veh) 30 during the highest hour Condition D - Combination Volume, Crash Experience, & Delay Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Required values reached for 12 hours, less than 4 crashes, & 17.5 sec. average delay/veh Criteria - Major Street (veh/hr) 240 for any 8 hours of an average day Criteria - Minor Street (total vol-veh, ped, & bikes/hr) 160 for the same 8 hours of an average day Criteria - Crash Experience 4 or more correctable crashes in 12-month period Criteria - Delay (average sec/veh) 24 during the highest hour 218 Intersection Information Major Street Name Great Plains Boulevard North/South or East/West N/S Speed Limit 35 mph or less # of Approach Lanes 2 or more % of Right Turn Traffic to Include 100% Minor Street Name Lake Dr East # of Approach Lanes 1 % of Right Turn Traffic to Include 100% Isolated Community < 10,000 pop No What Additional Warrants to Consider? Warrant 3, Peak Hour (A - Vol. and Delay) No Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Yes Warrant 5, School Crossing No Warrant 6, Coordinated Signal System Yes Warrant 7, Crash Experience Yes Warrant 8, Roadway Network Yes Warrant 9, Intersection Near a Grade Crossing No All-Way Stop Warrant Yes Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Project Name Intersection Control Evaluation Project/File # 25-33064 Scenario Projected 2025 219 Northbound Volume by Hour Time Left Turns Through Right Turns Peds/Bikes 12 - 1 AM 0 1 2 1 - 2 AM 0 0 1 2 - 3 AM 0 0 1 3 - 4 AM 0 1 2 4 - 5 AM 1 4 7 5 - 6 AM 1 10 16 6 - 7 AM 3 24 39 7 - 8 AM 6 27 75 8 - 9 AM 7 81 102 9 - 10 AM 9 74 121 10 - 11 AM 9 76 124 11 - 12 PM 11 94 154 12 - 1 PM 12 200 122 1 - 2 PM 9 153 93 2 - 3 PM 10 173 105 3 - 4 PM 10 164 100 4 - 5 PM 10 117 73 5 - 6 PM 4 115 68 6 - 7 PM 10 158 96 7 - 8 PM 7 112 68 8 - 9 PM 4 59 36 9 - 10 PM 3 49 30 10 - 11 PM 1 23 14 11 - 12 AM 0 3 2 Total Vehicles (unadjusted) 3,294 0 Southbound Volume by Hour Time Left Turns Through Right Turns Peds/Bikes 12 - 1 AM 2 1 1 1 - 2 AM 2 1 1 2 - 3 AM 1 1 0 3 - 4 AM 1 0 0 4 - 5 AM 2 1 1 5 - 6 AM 8 4 3 6 - 7 AM 29 15 12 7 - 8 AM 83 44 25 4 8 - 9 AM 94 48 47 9 - 10 AM 73 38 30 10 - 11 AM 81 42 33 11 - 12 PM 96 50 39 12 - 1 PM 56 75 85 1 - 2 PM 38 51 58 2 - 3 PM 46 61 69 3 - 4 PM 48 64 72 4 - 5 PM 75 108 124 5 - 6 PM 88 111 122 6 - 7 PM 44 59 66 7 - 8 PM 32 43 48 8 - 9 PM 23 31 35 9 - 10 PM 11 15 16 10 - 11 PM 3 4 4 11 - 12 AM 1 1 1 Total Vehicles (unadjusted) 2,693 4 Eastbound Volume by Hour Time Left Turns Through Right Turns Peds/Bikes 12 - 1 AM 5 1 1 1 - 2 AM 1 0 0 2 - 3 AM 1 0 0 3 - 4 AM 0 0 0 4 - 5 AM 3 1 1 5 - 6 AM 7 2 2 6 - 7 AM 27 7 7 7 - 8 AM 6 5 0 4 8 - 9 AM 30 4 9 9 - 10 AM 90 23 23 10 - 11 AM 84 21 21 11 - 12 PM 111 28 28 12 - 1 PM 138 24 22 1 - 2 PM 112 20 18 2 - 3 PM 96 17 15 3 - 4 PM 137 24 22 4 - 5 PM 79 15 11 5 - 6 PM 82 13 15 6 - 7 PM 98 17 16 7 - 8 PM 61 11 10 8 - 9 PM 51 9 8 9 - 10 PM 41 7 7 10 - 11 PM 16 3 3 11 - 12 AM 11 2 2 Total Vehicles (unadjusted) 1,779 4 Westbound Volume by Hour Time Left Turns Through Right Turns Peds/Bikes 12 - 1 AM 2 0 1 1 - 2 AM 1 0 0 2 - 3 AM 0 0 0 3 - 4 AM 0 0 0 4 - 5 AM 0 0 0 5 - 6 AM 0 0 0 6 - 7 AM 6 1 5 7 - 8 AM 63 11 29 8 - 9 AM 64 13 70 9 - 10 AM 25 5 20 10 - 11 AM 39 7 30 11 - 12 PM 41 8 32 12 - 1 PM 54 14 39 1 - 2 PM 54 14 40 2 - 3 PM 51 13 37 3 - 4 PM 52 13 38 4 - 5 PM 98 26 74 5 - 6 PM 87 22 61 6 - 7 PM 57 15 41 7 - 8 PM 43 11 32 8 - 9 PM 28 7 20 9 - 10 PM 26 7 19 10 - 11 PM 15 4 11 11 - 12 AM 5 1 3 Total Vehicles (unadjusted) 1,605 0 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Great Plains Boulevard (Major Street) Volume Lake Dr East (Minor Street) Volume 220 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Warrants 1 - 3 (Volume Warrants) Figure 4C-1 (Warrant 2) & Figure 4C-3 (Warrant 3) Project Name Intersection Control Evaluation Project/File # 25-33064 Scenario Projected 2025 Intersection Information Major Street (N/S Road) Great Plains Boulevard Minor Street (E/W Road) Lake Dr East Analyzed with 2 or more approach lanes Analyzed with 1 Approach Lane Total Approach Volume 5987 vehicles Total Approach Volume 3384 vehicles Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied No high speed or isolated community reduction applied to the Volume Warrant thresholds. Warrant 1, Eight Hour Vehicular Volume Condition A Condition B Condition A+B* Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Not Satisfied Not Satisfied Required values reached for 0 hours 0 hours 3 (Cond. A) & 0 (Cond. B) Criteria - Major Street (veh/hr) 600 900 480 (Cond. A) & 720 (Cond. B) Criteria - Minor Street (veh/hr) 150 75 120 (Cond. A) & 60 (Cond. B) * Should be applied only after an adequate trial of other alternatives that could cause less delay and inconvenience to traffic has failed to solve the traffic problems. Warrant 2, Four Hour Vehicular Volume Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Required values reached for 0 hours Criteria See Figure Below Warrant 3, Peak Hour Vehicular Volume Condition A Condition B Condition Satisfied? Not Examined Not Satisfied Required values reached for 0 hours Criteria - Total Approach Volume (veh in one hour) See Figure Below Criteria - Minor Street High Side Volume (veh in one hour) Criteria - Minor Street High Side Delay (veh-hrs) 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Major Street Volume (Both Approaches) Warrant 2 Threshold Warrant 3 Threshold Intersection Volumes Minor Street Volume (High Approach Only) Pedestrian Crossing Volume 221 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Warrants 4 to 6 (Pedestrian, School, Coordinated Systems) Figure 4C-5 & Figure 4C-7 (Warrant 4 Four Hour & Peak Hour) Project Name Intersection Control Evaluation Project/File # 25-33064 Scenario Projected 2025 Intersection Information Major Street (N/S Road) Great Plains Boulevard Minor Street (E/W Road) Lake Dr East Analyzed with 2 or more approach lanes Analyzed with 1 Approach Lane Total Approach Volume 5987 vehicles Total Approach Volume 3384 vehicles Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied No high speed or isolated community reduction applied to the Pedestrian Warrant thresholds. Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Condition A - Four Hour Vol. Condition B - Peak Hour Vol. Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Not Satisfied Required values reached for 0 hours 0 hours Criteria - Min. Distance to Nearest Controlled Crossing 300 feet, unless progressive movement not impacted Criteria - Major Street Volume and Crossing Volume See Figure Below 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Major Street Volume (Both Approaches) Warrant 5, School Crossing Condition Satisfied? Not Examined Criteria - School Crossing Data Warrant 6, Coordinated Signal System Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Criteria - Coordinated Signal System - If one-way, the adjacent traffic control signals are too far apart to provide the necessary degree of vehicular platooning. Ped Vol 4-Hour Threshold Ped Vol Peak Hour Threshold Intersection Volumes Pedestrian Crossing Volume 222 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Warrants 7-9 (Crash, Network, Rail Crossing) Figure 4C-10 (Two or More Approach Lanes): Distance D = 70 feet Project Name Intersection Control Evaluation Project/File # 25-33064 Scenario Projected 2025 Intersection Information Major Street (N/S Road) Great Plains Boulevard Minor Street (E/W Road) Lake Dr East Analyzed with 2 or more approach lanes Analyzed with 1 Approach Lane Total Approach Volume 5987 vehicles Total Approach Volume 3384 vehicles Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Reduction applied to Crash and Roadway Network Warrant thresholds due to high speed on Great Plains Boulevard. Warrant 7, Crash Experience Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Required values reached for Alternatives tried, 4 or less correctable crashes, 3 hours (Veh. Vol.), 0 hours (Ped 4-Hour), and 0 hours (Ped Peak Hour) Criteria - Alternatives Adequate trial has failed to reduce the crash frequency Criteria - Reported Crashes (within 12-month period) 5 or more crashes susceptible to correction by a traffic control signal Criteria - Major Street (veh/hr) - Minor Street (veh/hr) From Warrant 1: 480 (Cond. A), 720 (Cond. B) From Warrant 1: 120 (Cond. A), 60 (Cond. B) (Alternative Volume Requirement) Criteria - Pedestrian Volume 80 percent of the Pedestrian Volume Warrant requirements Warrant 8, Roadway Network Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Required values reached for Not an intersection of 2 major routes and satisfies volume/warrant requirements Criteria - Common Intersection of Two Major Routes - Part of the street or highway system, or - Includes rural or suburban highways outside, entering, or traversing a city, or - Appears as or major route on an official plan. Criteria - Existing or Immediately Projected Entering Volume 1,000 or more vehicles per typical peak hour Criteria - Warrants Satisfies Warrants 1, 2, or 3 with 5-year projected volumes (Alternative Requirement) Criteria - Non-normal Business Day 1,000 or more vehicles per hour for any 5 hours Warrant 9, Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Condition Satisfied? Not Examined Required values reached for Criteria - Alternatives Criteria - Max. Distance to Nearest Controlled Crossing Criteria - Major Street Volume and Crossing Volume 200 150 100 50 0 0 100 200 Maj3o0r0Street Volum4e00(Both Approa5c0h0es)- Vehicle6s0p0er Hour 700 800 900 Grade Crossing Threshold Intersection Volume Minor Street, Crossing Approach Equivalent Vehicles per Hour 223 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report- Chanhassen, MN Appendix C C-2 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Two-Way Left Turn Warrant Two-Way Right Turn Warrant Multi-Way Stop Warrant Traffic Signal Warrant 224 Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. Opposing Volume (VO), veh/h 2-lane roadway (English) INPUT Variable Value 800 700 Left-turn treatment warranted. 600 500 400 300 200 Left-turn treatment not 100 warranted. 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h 85th percentile speed, mph: 30 Percent of left-turns in advancing volume (VA), %: 28% Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: 491 Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: 303 OUTPUT Variable Value Limiting advancing volume (VA), veh/h: 305 Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: Left-turn treatment warranted. CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Variable Value Average time for making left-turn, s: 3.0 Critical headway, s: 5.0 Average time for left-turn vehicle to clear the advancing lane, s: 1.9 225 Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Roadway geometry: 2-lane roadw ay Variable Value Major-road speed, mph: 30 Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: 491 Right-turn volume, veh/h: 190 OUTPUT Variable Value Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: 602 Guidance for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway: Do NOT add right-turn bay. 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Right-Turn Volume, veh/h 226 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Multi-Way Stop Warrants Project Name Intersection Control Evaluation Project/File # 25-33064 Scenario Projected 2045 Intersection Information Major Street (N/S Road) Great Plains Boulevard Minor Street (E/W Road) Lake Dr East Analyzed with 2 or more approach lanes Analyzed with 1 Approach Lane Total Approach Volume 8808.39167281362 vehicles Total Approach Volume 3551.5319346833 vehicles Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied No high speed or isolated community reduction applied to the Multi-Way Stop Warrant thresholds. Condition A - Traffic Signal Warrant Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Criteria* Traffic Signal Warranted & Justified * Multi-way stop control may be used as an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. Condition B - Crash Experience Condition Satisfied? Not satisfied Required values reached for less than 4 correctable crashes Criteria - Crash Experience 5 or more correctable crashes in 12-month period Condition C - Intersection Volume & Delay Condition Satisfied? Satisfied Required values reached for 10 hours & 32 sec. average delay/veh Criteria - Major Street (veh/hr) 300 for any 8 hours of an average day Criteria - Minor Street (total vol-veh, ped, & bikes/hr) 200 for the same 8 hours of an average day Criteria - Delay (average sec/veh) 30 during the highest hour Condition D - Combination Volume, Crash Experience, & Delay Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Required values reached for 12 hours, less than 4 crashes, & 32 sec. average delay/veh Criteria - Major Street (veh/hr) 240 for any 8 hours of an average day Criteria - Minor Street (total vol-veh, ped, & bikes/hr) 160 for the same 8 hours of an average day Criteria - Crash Experience 4 or more correctable crashes in 12-month period Criteria - Delay (average sec/veh) 24 during the highest hour 227 Intersection Information Major Street Name Great Plains Boulevard North/South or East/West N/S Speed Limit 35 mph or less # of Approach Lanes 2 or more % of Right Turn Traffic to Include 100% Minor Street Name Lake Dr East # of Approach Lanes 1 % of Right Turn Traffic to Include 100% Isolated Community < 10,000 pop No What Additional Warrants to Consider? Warrant 3, Peak Hour (A - Vol. and Delay) No Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Yes Warrant 5, School Crossing No Warrant 6, Coordinated Signal System Yes Warrant 7, Crash Experience Yes Warrant 8, Roadway Network Yes Warrant 9, Intersection Near a Grade Crossing No All-Way Stop Warrant Yes Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Project Name Intersection Control Evaluation Project/File # 25-33064 Scenario Projected 2045 228 Northbound Volume by Hour Time Left Turns Through Right Turns Peds/Bikes 12 - 1 AM 0 2 3 1 - 2 AM 0 1 1 2 - 3 AM 0 1 1 3 - 4 AM 0 2 3 4 - 5 AM 1 6 10 5 - 6 AM 2 14 24 6 - 7 AM 4 35 58 7 - 8 AM 9 40 110 8 - 9 AM 10 119 150 9 - 10 AM 13 109 178 10 - 11 AM 13 111 182 11 - 12 PM 17 139 227 12 - 1 PM 18 289 184 1 - 2 PM 14 221 140 2 - 3 PM 15 249 159 3 - 4 PM 15 237 151 4 - 5 PM 15 172 107 5 - 6 PM 6 169 110 6 - 7 PM 14 228 145 7 - 8 PM 10 161 102 8 - 9 PM 5 85 54 9 - 10 PM 4 70 45 10 - 11 PM 2 33 21 11 - 12 AM 0 4 3 Total Vehicles (unadjusted) 4,851 0 Southbound Volume by Hour Time Left Turns Through Right Turns Peds/Bikes 12 - 1 AM 2 1 1 1 - 2 AM 2 1 1 2 - 3 AM 2 1 1 3 - 4 AM 1 0 0 4 - 5 AM 2 1 1 5 - 6 AM 11 6 5 6 - 7 AM 43 22 17 7 - 8 AM 122 65 37 8 - 9 AM 138 71 69 4 9 - 10 AM 107 56 43 10 - 11 AM 119 62 48 11 - 12 PM 141 74 57 12 - 1 PM 82 111 124 1 - 2 PM 56 75 85 2 - 3 PM 67 90 101 3 - 4 PM 70 94 106 4 - 5 PM 110 159 182 5 - 6 PM 129 163 179 6 - 7 PM 64 87 97 7 - 8 PM 47 63 71 8 - 9 PM 34 46 52 9 - 10 PM 16 22 24 10 - 11 PM 4 6 6 11 - 12 AM 1 1 1 Total Vehicles (unadjusted) 3,957 4 Eastbound Volume by Hour Time Left Turns Through Right Turns Peds/Bikes 12 - 1 AM 5 1 1 1 - 2 AM 1 0 0 2 - 3 AM 1 0 0 3 - 4 AM 0 0 0 4 - 5 AM 3 1 1 5 - 6 AM 7 2 2 6 - 7 AM 27 7 7 7 - 8 AM 6 5 0 4 8 - 9 AM 30 4 9 9 - 10 AM 90 23 23 10 - 11 AM 84 21 21 11 - 12 PM 111 28 28 12 - 1 PM 123 31 31 1 - 2 PM 100 25 25 2 - 3 PM 85 21 21 3 - 4 PM 122 31 31 4 - 5 PM 79 15 11 5 - 6 PM 82 13 15 6 - 7 PM 98 17 16 7 - 8 PM 61 11 10 8 - 9 PM 51 9 8 9 - 10 PM 41 7 7 10 - 11 PM 16 3 3 11 - 12 AM 11 2 2 Total Vehicles (unadjusted) 1,779 4 Westbound Volume by Hour Time Left Turns Through Right Turns Peds/Bikes 12 - 1 AM 2 0 1 1 - 2 AM 1 0 0 2 - 3 AM 0 0 0 3 - 4 AM 0 0 0 4 - 5 AM 0 0 0 5 - 6 AM 0 0 0 6 - 7 AM 7 1 5 7 - 8 AM 70 12 32 8 - 9 AM 71 14 77 9 - 10 AM 28 5 22 10 - 11 AM 43 8 34 11 - 12 PM 45 8 35 12 - 1 PM 60 11 47 1 - 2 PM 61 11 47 2 - 3 PM 58 11 45 3 - 4 PM 58 11 45 4 - 5 PM 108 29 82 5 - 6 PM 96 24 67 6 - 7 PM 63 16 46 7 - 8 PM 48 12 35 8 - 9 PM 31 8 22 9 - 10 PM 28 7 21 10 - 11 PM 17 4 12 11 - 12 AM 5 1 4 Total Vehicles (unadjusted) 1,773 0 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Great Plains Boulevard (Major Street) Volume Lake Dr East (Minor Street) Volume 229 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Warrants 1 - 3 (Volume Warrants) Figure 4C-1 (Warrant 2) & Figure 4C-3 (Warrant 3) Project Name Intersection Control Evaluation Project/File # 25-33064 Scenario Projected 2045 Intersection Information Major Street (N/S Road) Great Plains Boulevard Minor Street (E/W Road) Lake Dr East Analyzed with 2 or more approach lanes Analyzed with 1 Approach Lane Total Approach Volume 8808.39167281362 vehicles Total Approach Volume 3551.5319346833 vehicles Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied No high speed or isolated community reduction applied to the Volume Warrant thresholds. Warrant 1, Eight Hour Vehicular Volume Condition A Condition B Condition A+B* Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Not Satisfied Not Satisfied Required values reached for 5 hours 0 hours 11 (Cond. A) & 3 (Cond. B) Criteria - Major Street (veh/hr) 600 900 480 (Cond. A) & 720 (Cond. B) Criteria - Minor Street (veh/hr) 150 75 120 (Cond. A) & 60 (Cond. B) * Should be applied only after an adequate trial of other alternatives that could cause less delay and inconvenience to traffic has failed to solve the traffic problems. Warrant 2, Four Hour Vehicular Volume Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Required values reached for 0 hours Criteria See Figure Below Warrant 3, Peak Hour Vehicular Volume Condition A Condition B Condition Satisfied? Not Examined Not Satisfied Required values reached for 0 hours Criteria - Total Approach Volume (veh in one hour) See Figure Below Criteria - Minor Street High Side Volume (veh in one hour) Criteria - Minor Street High Side Delay (veh-hrs) 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Major Street Volume (Both Approaches) Warrant 2 Threshold Warrant 3 Threshold Intersection Volumes Minor Street Volume (High Approach Only) Pedestrian Crossing Volume 230 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Warrants 4 to 6 (Pedestrian, School, Coordinated Systems) Figure 4C-5 & Figure 4C-7 (Warrant 4 Four Hour & Peak Hour) Project Name Intersection Control Evaluation Project/File # 25-33064 Scenario Projected 2045 Intersection Information Major Street (N/S Road) Great Plains Boulevard Minor Street (E/W Road) Lake Dr East Analyzed with 2 or more approach lanes Analyzed with 1 Approach Lane Total Approach Volume 8808.39167281362 vehicles Total Approach Volume 3551.5319346833 vehicles Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied No high speed or isolated community reduction applied to the Pedestrian Warrant thresholds. Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Condition A - Four Hour Vol. Condition B - Peak Hour Vol. Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Not Satisfied Required values reached for 0 hours 0 hours Criteria - Min. Distance to Nearest Controlled Crossing 300 feet, unless progressive movement not impacted Criteria - Major Street Volume and Crossing Volume See Figure Below 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Major Street Volume (Both Approaches) Warrant 5, School Crossing Condition Satisfied? Not Examined Criteria - School Crossing Data Warrant 6, Coordinated Signal System Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Criteria - Coordinated Signal System - If one-way, the adjacent traffic control signals are too far apart to provide the necessary degree of vehicular platooning. Ped Vol 4-Hour Threshold Ped Vol Peak Hour Threshold Intersection Volumes Pedestrian Crossing Volume 231 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Warrants 7-9 (Crash, Network, Rail Crossing) Figure 4C-10 (Two or More Approach Lanes): Distance D = 70 feet Project Name Intersection Control Evaluation Project/File # 25-33064 Scenario Projected 2045 Intersection Information Major Street (N/S Road) Great Plains Boulevard Minor Street (E/W Road) Lake Dr East Analyzed with 2 or more approach lanes Analyzed with 1 Approach Lane Total Approach Volume 8808.39167281362 vehicles Total Approach Volume 3551.5319346833 vehicles Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Reduction applied to Crash and Roadway Network Warrant thresholds due to high speed on Great Plains Boulevard. Warrant 7, Crash Experience Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Required values reached for Alternatives not tried, 4 or less correctable crashes, 11 hours (Veh. Vol.), 0 hours (Ped 4-Hour), and 0 hours (Ped Peak Hour) Criteria - Alternatives Adequate trial has failed to reduce the crash frequency Criteria - Reported Crashes (within 12-month period) 5 or more crashes susceptible to correction by a traffic control signal Criteria - Major Street (veh/hr) - Minor Street (veh/hr) From Warrant 1: 480 (Cond. A), 720 (Cond. B) From Warrant 1: 120 (Cond. A), 60 (Cond. B) (Alternative Volume Requirement) Criteria - Pedestrian Volume 80 percent of the Pedestrian Volume Warrant requirements Warrant 8, Roadway Network Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Required values reached for Not an intersection of 2 major routes, but does not satisfy volume/warrant or alternative volume requirements Criteria - Common Intersection of Two Major Routes - Part of the street or highway system, or - Includes rural or suburban highways outside, entering, or traversing a city, or - Appears as or major route on an official plan. Criteria - Existing or Immediately Projected Entering Volume 1,000 or more vehicles per typical peak hour Criteria - Warrants Satisfies Warrants 1, 2, or 3 with 5-year projected volumes (Alternative Requirement) Criteria - Non-normal Business Day 1,000 or more vehicles per hour for any 5 hours Warrant 9, Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Condition Satisfied? Not Examined Required values reached for Criteria - Alternatives Criteria - Max. Distance to Nearest Controlled Crossing Criteria - Major Street Volume and Crossing Volume 200 150 100 50 0 0 100 200 Maj3o0r0Street Volum4e00(Both Approa5c0h0es) - Vehicle6s0p0er Hour 700 800 900 Grade Crossing Threshold Intersection Volume Minor Street, Crossing Approach Equivalent Vehicles per Hour 232 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report- Chanhassen, MN Appendix D Appendix D: Synchro Capacity Analysis D-1 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS D-2 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 233 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report- Chanhassen, MN Appendix D D-1 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) All-Way Stop Control (AWSC) Traffic Signal Roundabout 234 HCM 6th TWSC 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd 07/21/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 2025 Existing - TWSC Baseline M M Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 93 11 16 95 27 68 6 125 82 94 111 129 Future Vol, veh/h 93 11 16 95 27 68 6 125 82 94 111 129 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - 160 - 80 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 101 12 17 103 29 74 7 136 89 102 121 140 Major/Minor Mi inor1 Major1 ajor2 Conflicting Flow All 564 121 605 660 113 261 0 0 225 0 0 Stage 1 325 - 195 195 - - - - - - - Stage 2 239 - 410 465 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.5 6.2 7.3 6.5 6.9 4.1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 438 936 399 386 925 1315 - - - Stage 1 653 - 794 743 - - - - - - - Stage 2 711 - 623 566 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 403 936 359 355 925 1315 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 403 - 359 355 - - - - - Stage 1 604 - 789 739 - - - - - Stage 2 707 - 554 524 - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15.9 19.1 0.2 2.2 HCM LOS C C HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - - 0.283 0.45 0.075 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - 15.9 19.1 7.9 - - HCM Lane LOS A A - C C A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 1.2 2.3 0.2 - - Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1315 - - 461 459 1356 - - 235 Queuing and Blocking Report Baseline 07/21/2025 SimTraffic Report Page 1 2025 Existing - TWSC Intersection: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd Movement EB WB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L Maximum Queue (ft) 51 68 25 Average Queue (ft) 30 51 13 95th Queue (ft) 57 77 38 Link Distance (ft) 264 710 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 236 HCM 6th AWSC 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd 07/21/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 2025 Existing - AWSC 10:58 am 07/21/2025 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 11 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 93 11 16 95 27 68 6 125 82 94 111 129 Future Vol, veh/h 93 11 16 95 27 68 6 125 82 94 111 129 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 101 12 17 103 29 74 7 136 89 102 121 140 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 3 2 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 3 2 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 3 1 1 HCM Control Delay 11.7 12.6 10.9 10 HCM LOS B B B A Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3 Vol Left, % 9% 0% 78% 50% 100% 0% 0% Vol Thru, % 91% 43% 9% 14% 0% 100% 0% Vol Right, % 0% 57% 13% 36% 0% 0% 100% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 69 145 120 190 94 111 129 LT Vol 6 0 93 95 94 0 0 Through Vol 63 63 11 27 0 111 0 RT Vol 0 82 16 68 0 0 129 Lane Flow Rate 74 157 130 207 102 121 140 Geometry Grp 8 8 7 7 7 7 7 Degree of Util (X) 0.137 0.27 0.244 0.362 0.184 0.201 0.205 Departure Headway (Hd) 6.621 6.188 6.74 6.309 6.493 5.985 5.274 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 540 578 532 570 552 598 679 Service Time 4.38 3.947 4.497 4.059 4.243 3.734 3.023 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.137 0.272 0.244 0.363 0.185 0.202 0.206 HCM Control Delay 10.4 11.2 11.7 12.6 10.7 10.2 9.4 HCM Lane LOS B B B B B B A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 1.1 1 1.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 237 Queuing and Blocking Report SimTraffic Report Page 1 2025 Existing - AWSC 07/21/2025 Intersection: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LT TR L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 44 50 34 52 35 49 45 Average Queue (ft) 27 39 28 36 32 36 34 95th Queue (ft) 48 57 48 56 39 56 49 Link Distance (ft) 264 710 188 188 467 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 80 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 238 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd 07/21/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 2025 Existing - Signal 5:00 pm 07/21/2025 Baseline Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 93 11 16 95 27 68 6 125 82 94 111 129 Future Volume (vph) 93 11 16 95 27 68 6 125 82 94 111 12 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 150 150 150 150 150 160 8 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 120 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.982 0.952 0.942 0.850 Flt Protected 0.963 0.976 0.998 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1797 0 0 1765 0 0 3311 0 1805 1900 1615 Flt Permitted 0.670 0.823 0.950 0.607 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1250 0 0 1489 0 0 3152 0 1153 1900 1615 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Ye Satd. Flow (RTOR) 17 66 89 14 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 315 759 248 576 Travel Time (s) 7.2 17.3 5.6 13.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 5% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 101 12 17 103 29 74 7 136 89 102 121 14 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 130 0 0 206 0 0 232 0 102 121 14 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Righ Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 18 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Righ Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 2 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 2 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+E Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 239 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd 07/21/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 2025 Existing - Signal 5:00 pm 07/21/2025 Baseline Intersection Signal Delay: 8.6 Intersection LOS: A Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (%) 48.0% 48.0% 48.0% 48.0% 52.0% 52.0% 52.0% 52.0% 52.0% Maximum Green (s) 19.5 19.5 19.5 19.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 10.5 10.5 33.4 33.4 33.4 33.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.57 0.11 0.13 0.10 0.12 Control Delay 19.9 17.5 3.5 4.2 3.6 0.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 19.9 17.5 3.5 4.2 3.6 0.8 LOS B B A A A Approach Delay 19.9 17.5 3.5 2.7 Approach LOS B B A A Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Actuated Cycle Length: 50 Offset: 31 (62%), Referenc ed to phase 2:NBTL an d 6:SB TL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 45 Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.57 Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.3% ICU Level of Service A Splits and Phases: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd Analysis Period (min) 15 240 Queuing and Blocking Report Baseline 07/21/2025 SimTraffic Report Page 1 2025 Existing - Signal Intersection: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LT TR L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 64 112 38 52 56 56 40 Average Queue (ft) 43 72 16 28 32 29 20 95th Queue (ft) 80 125 43 60 66 66 50 Link Distance (ft) 264 710 188 188 467 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 80 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 241 Proportion of CAVs, % 0 HCS Roundabouts Report General Information Site Information Analyst Corona Woychik Intersection 1 Agency or Co. ISG E/W Street Name Lake Dr E/Commercial Access Date Performed Analysis Year Time Analyzed 7/21/2025 2025 PM Peak Hour N/S Street Name Analysis Time Period, hrs Peak Hour Factor Great Plains Blvd 0.25 0.94 Project Description Intersection Control Evaluation Jurisdiction City of Chanhassen Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement Number of Lanes (N) U L 0 0 T 1 R 0 U 0 L 0 T R U L T R U T 1 R 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Lane Assignment LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume (V), veh/h 0 93 11 16 0 95 27 68 0 6 125 82 0 94 111 129 Percent Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 Flow Rate (vPCE), pc/h 0 99 12 17 0 101 29 72 0 6 134 92 0 10 118 137 Right-Turn Bypass None None None None Conflicting Lanes 1 1 1 1 Pedestrians Crossing, p/h 0 0 0 0 Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway, s 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (ve), pc/h 128 202 232 355 Entry Volume, veh/h 128 202 226 355 Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h 319 239 211 136 Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h 204 172 305 236 Capacity (cpce), pc/h 997 1081 1113 1201 Capacity (c), veh/h 997 1081 1085 1201 v/c Ratio (x) 0.13 0.19 0.21 0.30 Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass A Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh 4.8 A 5.0 5.2 5.7 Lane LOS A A A A 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) 0.4 0.7 0.8 1.2 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft) 4.8 10.0 17.5 20.4 30.0 Approach Delay, s/veh | LOS 5.0 A 5 A 5. Intersection Delay, s/veh | LOS 5.3 A 242 Queuing and Blocking Report Baseline 07/21/2025 Intersection: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 40 45 54 31 Average Queue (ft) 16 19 22 12 95th Queue (ft) 50 51 62 37 Link Distance (ft) 261 705 168 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2025 Existing - Single Lane Roundabout SimTraffic Report Page 1 243 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report- Chanhassen, MN Appendix D D-2 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) All-Way Stop Control (AWSC) Traffic Signal Roundabout 244 HCM 6th TWSC 2045 Future - TWSC 4:34 pm 07/23/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Stage 1 567 491 - 697 673 - - - - - - - 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd 09/17/2025 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 12.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 93 11 16 105 30 75 9 183 120 138 163 190 Future Vol, veh/h 93 11 16 105 30 75 9 183 120 138 163 190 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - 160 - 80 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 613 826 177 879 968 165 384 0 0 329 0 0 Stage 2 136 349 - 595 684 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - - Stage 1 573 559 - 705 680 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 286 269 - 219 222 - - - - - - - Stage 2 731 630 - 415 397 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 24.6 47.3 0.2 2.3 HCM LOS C E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1186 - - 312 299 1242 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - 0.418 0.763 0.121 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.1 0 - 24.6 47.3 8.3 - - HCM Lane LOS A A - C E A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 2 5.8 0.4 - - Mvmt Flow 101 12 17 114 33 82 10 199 130 150 177 207 Stage 1 477 477 - 284 284 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.3 6.5 6.2 7.3 6.5 6.9 4.1 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.5 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 394 310 871 257 256 857 1186 - - 1242 - - Stage 2 859 637 - 494 452 - - - - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 286 269 871 219 222 857 1186 - - 1242 - - 245 Queuing and Blocking Report 2045 Future - TWSC SimTraffic Report Page 1 09/17/2025 Intersection: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LT TR L R Maximum Queue (ft) 56 91 10 9 44 9 Average Queue (ft) 34 60 3 2 30 2 95th Queue (ft) 59 97 22 11 53 12 Link Distance (ft) 264 710 188 188 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 80 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 246 HCM 6th AWSC 2045 Future - AWSC 4:39 pm 07/23/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd 09/17/2025 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 13.5 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 93 11 16 105 30 75 9 183 120 138 163 190 Future Vol, veh/h 93 11 16 105 30 75 9 183 120 138 163 190 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 101 12 17 114 33 82 10 199 130 150 177 207 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 3 2 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 3 2 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 3 1 1 HCM Control Delay 13.5 15.8 14.2 12.1 HCM LOS B C B B Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3 Vol Left, % 9% 0% 78% 50% 100% 0% 0% Vol Thru, % 91% 43% 9% 14% 0% 100% 0% Vol Right, % 0% 57% 13% 36% 0% 0% 100% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 101 212 120 210 138 163 190 LT Vol 9 0 93 105 138 0 0 Through Vol 92 92 11 30 0 163 0 RT Vol 0 120 16 75 0 0 190 Lane Flow Rate 109 230 130 228 150 177 207 Geometry Grp 8 8 7 7 7 7 7 Degree of Util (X) 0.223 0.442 0.28 0.455 0.294 0.322 0.335 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.35 6.914 7.719 7.169 7.06 6.549 5.834 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 488 520 466 502 512 553 620 Service Time 5.098 4.662 5.468 4.912 4.76 4.249 3.534 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.223 0.442 0.279 0.454 0.293 0.32 0.334 HCM Control Delay 12.2 15.1 13.5 15.8 12.7 12.3 11.4 HCM Lane LOS B C B C B B B HCM 95th-tile Q 0.8 2.2 1.1 2.3 1.2 1.4 1.5 247 Queuing and Blocking Report 2045 Future - AWSC SimTraffic Report Page 1 09/17/2025 Intersection: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LT TR L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 38 63 50 63 49 57 53 Average Queue (ft) 24 48 40 41 36 41 38 95th Queue (ft) 41 70 59 68 51 61 56 Link Distance (ft) 264 710 188 188 467 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 80 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 248 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd 09/17/2025 2045 Future - Signal 4:55 pm 07/23/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 93 11 16 105 30 75 9 183 120 138 163 190 Future Volume (vph) 93 11 16 105 30 75 9 183 120 138 163 190 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 150 150 150 150 150 160 80 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 120 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.982 0.952 0.942 0.850 Flt Protected 0.963 0.976 0.999 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1797 0 0 1765 0 0 3314 0 1805 1900 1615 Flt Permitted 0.653 0.815 0.949 0.548 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1218 0 0 1474 0 0 3148 0 1041 1900 1615 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 17 66 130 207 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 315 759 248 576 Travel Time (s) 7.2 17.3 5.6 13.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 5% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 101 12 17 114 33 82 10 199 130 150 177 207 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 130 0 0 229 0 0 339 0 150 177 207 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 18 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 249 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd 09/17/2025 2045 Future - Signal 4:55 pm 07/23/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (%) 48.0% 48.0% 48.0% 48.0% 52.0% 52.0% 52.0% 52.0% 52.0% Maximum Green (s) 19.5 19.5 19.5 19.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 11.2 11.2 29.8 29.8 29.8 29.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.60 0.18 0.24 0.16 0.20 Control Delay 18.5 18.0 3.8 6.1 4.8 1.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 18.5 18.0 3.8 6.1 4.8 1.0 LOS B B A A A A Approach Delay 18.5 18.0 3.8 3.7 Approach LOS B B A A Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Actuated Cycle Length: 50 Offset: 31 (62%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 45 Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.60 Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.2% ICU Level of Service A Splits and Phases: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd Intersection Signal Delay: 8.0 Intersection LOS: A Analysis Period (min) 15 250 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Great Plains Blvd & Arboretum Blvd 09/17/2025 2045 Future - Signal 4:55 pm 07/23/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 250 800 125 125 800 250 200 20 70 230 100 230 Future Volume (vph) 250 800 125 125 800 250 200 20 70 230 100 230 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 640 0 520 0 140 100 0 60 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 120 180 100 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 3433 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.146 0.148 0.687 0.634 Satd. Flow (perm) 272 3539 1583 276 3539 1583 2483 1863 1583 1181 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 207 272 207 208 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 886 714 576 253 Travel Time (s) 20.1 16.2 13.1 5.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 272 870 136 136 870 272 217 22 76 250 109 250 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 272 870 136 136 870 272 217 22 76 250 109 250 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 36 36 30 30 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 251 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Great Plains Blvd & Arboretum Blvd 09/17/2025 2045 Future - Signal 4:55 pm 07/23/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Natural Cycle: 100 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.5 32.5 32.5 10.5 32.5 32.5 10.5 32.5 32.5 23.5 32.5 32.5 Total Split (s) 11.0 32.9 32.9 10.6 32.5 32.5 10.6 33.0 33.0 23.5 45.9 45.9 Total Split (%) 11.0% 32.9% 32.9% 10.6% 32.5% 32.5% 10.6% 33.0% 33.0% 23.5% 45.9% 45.9% Maximum Green (s) 5.5 27.4 27.4 5.1 27.0 27.0 5.1 27.5 27.5 18.0 40.4 40.4 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 32.9 27.4 27.4 32.1 27.0 27.0 37.0 31.9 31.9 50.7 40.4 40.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.27 0.27 0.32 0.27 0.27 0.37 0.32 0.32 0.51 0.40 0.40 v/c Ratio 1.59 0.90 0.23 0.83 0.91 0.44 0.22 0.04 0.12 0.37 0.14 0.33 Control Delay 315.4 48.4 1.7 62.8 50.3 6.0 13.8 24.2 0.9 15.8 19.6 5.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 315.4 48.4 1.7 62.8 50.3 6.0 13.8 24.2 0.9 15.8 19.6 5.8 LOS F D A E D A B C A B B A Approach Delay 100.2 42.2 11.4 12.4 Approach LOS F D B B Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 100 Offset: 24 (24%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Intersection Signal Delay: 55.5 Intersection LOS: E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: Great Plains Blvd & Arboretum Blvd Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.59 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.1% ICU Level of Service C 252 Queuing and Blocking Report 2045 Future - Signal SimTraffic Report Page 1 09/17/2025 Intersection: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LT TR L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 68 152 59 71 69 61 55 Average Queue (ft) 42 88 27 37 46 31 29 95th Queue (ft) 76 158 66 84 81 75 65 Link Distance (ft) 264 710 188 188 467 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 80 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 253 HCS Roundabouts Report General Information Site Information Analyst Corona Woychik Intersection 1 Agency or Co. ISG E/W Street Name Lake Dr E/Commercial Access Date Performed 7/21/2025 N/S Street Name Great Plains Blvd Analysis Year 2045 Analysis Time Period, hrs 0.25 Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.94 Project Description Intersection Control Evaluation Jurisdiction City of Chanhassen Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Number of Lanes (N) 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Lane Assignment LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume (V), veh/h 0 93 11 16 0 105 30 75 0 9 183 120 0 138 163 190 Percent Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 Flow Rate (vPCE), pc/h 0 99 12 17 0 112 32 80 0 10 197 134 0 147 173 202 Right-Turn Bypass None None None None Conflicting Lanes 1 1 1 1 Pedestrians Crossing, p/h 0 0 0 0 Proportion of CAVs, % 0 Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway, s 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (ve), pc/h 128 224 341 522 Entry Volume, veh/h 128 224 333 522 Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h 432 306 258 154 Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h 293 244 376 302 Capacity (cpce), pc/h 888 1010 1061 1179 Capacity (c), veh/h 888 1010 1035 1179 v/c Ratio (x) 0.14 0.22 0.32 0.44 Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh 5.5 5.7 6.7 7.7 Lane LOS A A A A 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) 0.5 0.8 1.4 2.3 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft) 12.5 20.0 35.7 57.5 Approach Delay, s/veh | LOS 5.5 A 5.7 A 6.7 A 7.7 A Intersection Delay, s/veh | LOS 6.8 A 254 Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd 09/17/2025 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 40 49 77 68 Average Queue (ft) 19 18 39 34 95th Queue (ft) 49 55 87 82 Link Distance (ft) 261 705 168 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2025 Future - Single Lane Roundabout SimTraffic Report Page 1 255 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report- Chanhassen, MN Appendix E Appendix E: Layouts of Roundabout Exhibits EXHIBIT: 90-FOOT INSCRIBED CIRCLE DIAMETER (MINI ROUNDABOUT) EXHIBIT: 120-FOOT INSCRIBED CIRCLE DIAMETER (STANDARD ROUNDABOUT) 256 LAKE DRIVE E REHABILITATION 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com DWG LOCATION: H:\PROPOSALS\CHANHASSEN, MN\GREAT PLANES BLVD ROUNDABOUT.DWG SAVED BY: BARRETT.HUBBARD 90' ICD MINI ROUNDABOUT N Sheet Number X of X 90' ICD LAKE DRIVE EGREAT PLAINS BOULEVARDISG PROJECT NO. 25-33064 CHANHASSEN, MN - 09/15/2025 257 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com DWG LOCATION: H:\PROPOSALS\CHANHASSEN, MN\GREAT PLANES BLVD ROUNDABOUT-120ICD.DWG SAVED BY: BARRETT.HUBBARD 120' ICD ROUNDABOUT N Sheet Number X of X ISG PROJECT NO. 25-33064 CHANHASSEN, MN - 09/15/2025 120' ICD LAKE DRIVE EGREAT PLAINS BOULEVARDLAKE DRIVE E REHABILITATION 258 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report- Chanhassen, MN Appendix F Appendix F: Intersection Sight Distance F-1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SIGHT DISTANCE Sight Triangles at Two-Way Stop Control Intersection- Lake Dr E Sight Triangles at Two-Way Stop Control Intersection- Commercial Driveway F-2 ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL SIGHT DISTANCE Sight Triangle at All-Way Stop Control Intersection 259 0 SCALE IN FEET 69 139 Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\33000 PROJ\33000-33099\33064 2026 LAKE DRIVE E REHAB PROJEC- CHANHASSEN MN\33064 PRODUCTION FILES\33064 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION\INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE_LAKE DR E STOP.DWG SAVED BY: HARITHA.GURRALA GREAT PLAINS BLVD AND LAKE DR E INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE ISG PROJECT NO. 25-33064 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA - --/--/--GREAT PLAINS BLVDLAKE DRIVE ECOMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY CALCULATION NOTES: ·DECISION POINT OFFSET FROM EDGE OF THE MAJOR ROAD TRAVELED WAY = 14.5 FEET ·DESIGN SPEED OF MAJOR ROAD = 30 MPH ·CASE B1 - LEFT TURN FROM THE MINOR ROAD, TIME GAP, SINGLE UNIT TRUCK= 11 S ·CASE B2 - RIGHT FROM THE MINOR ROAD, TIME GAP, SINGLE UNIT TRUCK = 8.5 S MINNE S O T A T R U N K HI G H W A Y 5 DECISION POINT N 375 FT SIGHT DISTANCE REQ'D 507 FT SIGHT DISTANCE REQ'D V1 V3 V2 DECISION SIGHT DISTANCE IS CLEAR (CASE B2) DECISION SIGHT DISTANCE IS CLEAR (CASE B1) 260 0 SCALE IN FEET 69 139 Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\33000 PROJ\33000-33099\33064 2026 LAKE DRIVE E REHAB PROJEC- CHANHASSEN MN\33064 PRODUCTION FILES\33064 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION\INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE_DRIVEWAY STOP.DWG SAVED BY: HARITHA.GURRALA GREAT PLAINS BLVD AND LAKE DR E INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE ISG PROJECT NO. 25-33064 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA - --/--/-- TREES WITHIN SIGHT TRIANGLES (CASE B1) V1 V3 V2 GREAT PLAINS BLVDLAKE DRIVE ECOMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY BUILDING WITHIN SIGHT TRIANGLE (CASE B1) 375 FT SIGHT DISTANCE REQ'D 463 FT SIGHT DISTANCE REQ'D CALCULATION NOTES: ·DECISION POINT OFFSET FROM EDGE OF THE MAJOR ROAD TRAVELED WAY = 14.5 FEET ·DESIGN SPEED OF MAJOR ROAD = 30 MPH ·CASE B1 - LEFT TURN FROM THE MINOR ROAD, TIME GAP, SINGLE UNIT TRUCK= 10.5 S ·CASE B2 - RIGHT FROM THE MINOR ROAD, TIME GAP, SINGLE UNIT TRUCK = 8.5 S MINNE S O T A T R U N K HI G H W A Y 5 DECISION POINT N 261 SIG H T L I N E SIG H T L I N E SIGHT LINESIGHT LINESIGHT L INE SIGHT LINE 0 SCALE IN FEET 70 139 Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\33000 PROJ\33000-33099\33064 2026 LAKE DRIVE E REHAB PROJEC- CHANHASSEN MN\33064 PRODUCTION FILES\33064 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION\INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE_ALL-WAY STOP.DWG SAVED BY: HARITHA.GURRALA GREAT PLAINS BLVD AND LAKE DR E INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE ISG PROJECT NO. 25-33064 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA - --/--/--GREAT PLAINS BLVDLAKE DRIVE ECOMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY NOTES: ·DECISION POINT OFFSET FROM EDGE OF THE MAJOR ROAD TRAVELED WAY = 14.5 FEET MINNE S O T A T R U N K HI G H W A Y 5 SIGHT LINES ARE CLEAR N V1 V2 V3 V4 262 Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report- Chanhassen, MN Appendix G Appendix G: Future Approach Lane Queue & LOS 263 HCM 6th AWSC 2045 Future - AWSC with Recommendations 4:39 pm 07/23/2025 Synchro 11 Report Page 1 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd 09/17/2025 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 15.3 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 93 11 16 105 30 75 9 183 120 138 163 190 Future Vol, veh/h 93 11 16 105 30 75 9 183 120 138 163 190 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 101 12 17 114 33 82 10 199 130 150 177 207 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1 HCM Control Delay 12.2 13.8 15.9 16.4 HCM LOS B B C C Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left, % 3% 78% 50% 100% 0% Vol Thru, % 59% 9% 14% 0% 46% Vol Right, % 38% 13% 36% 0% 54% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 312 120 210 138 353 LT Vol 9 93 105 138 0 Through Vol 183 11 30 0 163 RT Vol 120 16 75 0 190 Lane Flow Rate 339 130 228 150 384 Geometry Grp 5 2 2 7 7 Degree of Util (X) 0.553 0.249 0.407 0.283 0.629 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.875 6.886 6.417 6.794 5.902 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 617 520 562 531 614 Service Time 3.886 4.939 4.46 4.506 3.613 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.549 0.25 0.406 0.282 0.625 HCM Control Delay 15.9 12.2 13.8 12.2 18.1 HCM Lane LOS C B B B C HCM 95th-tile Q 3.4 1 2 1.2 4.4 264 Queuing and Blocking Report 2045 Future - AWSC with Recommendations SimTraffic Report Page 1 09/17/2025 Intersection: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd Movement EB WB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 43 60 73 58 78 Average Queue (ft) 33 47 60 39 61 95th Queue (ft) 46 69 88 59 84 Link Distance (ft) 278 708 189 467 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 265 Streets - Lake Drive East/Great Plains Improvements Overview Request Owner Charlie Howley, PW Director/City Engineer Department Annual Pvmnt Mgmt Contracted Form Type Capital Improvement Request Type Street Construction/Reconstruction Project Number ST-049 Description Project includes the rehabilitation of Lake Drive East from Great Plains Blvd to where the 2018 project began. Details Type of Project Reconstruction Location 266 Capital Cost Breakdown Capital Cost FY2026 Total Engineering $300,000 $300,000 Construction/Maintenance $1,100,000 $1,100,000 Total $1,400,000 $1,400,000 Capital Cost FY2026 Budget $1,400,000 Total Budget (all years) $1.4M Project Total $1.4M Capital Cost by Year Construction/Maintenance Engineering 2026 $1,400,000.00 $0 $400K $800K $1.2M Capital Cost for Budgeted Years TOTAL $1,400,000.00 Construction/Maintenance (79%)$1,100,000.0 Engineering (21%)$300,000.00 267 Funding Sources Breakdown Funding Sources FY2026 Total Streets - PMP Assessments $552,000 $552,000 Utility Fund - Water $5,000 $5,000 Utility Fund - Sewer $5,000 $5,000 Utility Fund - SW Mgmt $10,000 $10,000 Streets - PMP MSA Funds $828,000 $828,000 Total $1,400,000 $1,400,000 Funding Sources FY2026 Budget $1,400,000 Total Budget (all years) $1.4M Project Total $1.4M Funding Sources by Year Streets - PMP Assessments Streets - PMP MSA Funds Utility Fund - Sewer Utility Fund - SW Mgmt Utility Fund - Water 2026 $1,400,000.00 $0 $400K $800K $1.2M Funding Sources for Budgeted Years TOTAL $1,400,000.00 Streets - PMP Assessments (39%)$552,000.00 Streets - PMP MSA Funds (59%)$828,000.00 Utility Fund - Sewer (0%)$5,000.00 Utility Fund - SW Mgmt (1%)$10,000.00 Utility Fund - Water (0%)$5,000.00 268 ########################################################################################################################################################################M M M M M Lake Virginia Christmas Lake Lotus Lake Brendan Pond Lake Harrison Kerber Pond Lake Susan Rice Marsh Lake Lake Riley Rice Lake Lake St. Joe Lake Minnewashta Lake Ann Lake Lucy ST18 ST14 ST15 ST17 ST61 Minnewashta Regional Park North Lotus Lake Park Meadow Green Park Lake Ann Park Chanhassen Pond Park Chanhassen Nature Preserve Chanhassen Recreation Center Lake Susan Park Rice Marsh Lake Preserve Power Hill Park Fox Woods Preserve Bandimere Community Park Bluff Creek Golf Course Hesse Farm Park Preserve Lake Susan Preserve City Center Park Raguet Wildlife Management Are MN Valley National Wildlife Re MN Landscape Arboretum Seminary Fen Scientific & Nat* Bluff Creek Preserve Independent School District 11 Independent School District 112 Independent School District 276 Riley Ridge Park Lake Ann Park Preserve SA7 SA101 SA5 SA5 SA41 )212 PowersBlvdLyman Blvd ChanhassenRdA r b o r e t u m Blvd Pioneer Trl A r boretum Blvd GalpinBlvdH w y212Hwy 212Hazeltine BlvdMa r k etBl v dPowers BlvdHwy 7AudubonRdF ly in g C lo u d D r Great Plains BlvdC o R d 1 0 1 ST101 ST101 Date Created: 10/23/2024 Document Path: K:\Departments\Engineering\CIP\2025-2029\CIP_5Year_2025-2029.aprxCreated By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department µ0 3,000 Feet 0 0.5 Mile 5-Year CIP Pavement Management Plan (PMP) - Streets (2025-2029) City of Chanhassen Legend 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Mill & Overlay Full Depth Reclamation ##Reconstruction M Municipal State Aid 269 Page 1 of 5 CITY OF CHANHASSEN ASSESSMENT POLICY Date of Last City Council Adoption: May 5, 2025 The City of Chanhassen’s Assessment Policy is intended to provide general direction to City Staff and their consultants in preparation of assessment rolls to establish fair and consistent treatment of all properties within the City that are subject to an assessment. This document can also be used to educate and explain to property owners about the Policy. All assessments shall follow the process outlined in Minnesota State Statutes, Chapter 429, which gives the City the legal authority to assess benefiting property for public improvements. The strict interpretation of this Policy may not apply in all circumstances, it is intended to be a guide for a systematic process. The City Council may direct staff to use special consideration and discretion for the assessment methodology on projects. WHICH PROPERTIES ARE TO BE ASSESED Determination about which properties are to be included in the assessment role generally fall into two (2) property types: 1. Type 1: Land use that generates a low level of vehicular traffic, such as low-density residential properties. o These properties shall be included in the assessment role for public street improvements that have their primary driveway access, or that it can be reasonably determined will have a future driveway access, to the street being rehabilitated. This includes property with a shared driveway or private street access to the public street, except where said private street meets applicable criteria to allow for a reduced or no assessment. The policy acknowledges that private streets are not maintained by the City and therefore all costs associated with the maintenance of them are borne by the property legally required to maintain them. Applicable criteria of private streets includes whether the street meets City Code requirements with respect to width, pavement section, and appropriate fire apparatus turn-around. 2. Other land use property types that generate increased levels of vehicular traffic, such as commercial, multi- family, or schools. o These properties shall be included in the assessment role for all adjacent public street improvement projects, regardless of which street their primary driveway takes access from, or the number of driveway access points; unless it can be reasonably determined that the use of the property does not have any traffic impact on the adjacent public street receiving the improvements. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY There are various ways to calculate assessments. The typical methodology is based on the number of parcels, an area, or linear foot calculation. Chanhassen has also developed a policy that utilizes a flat rate, meaning all parcels to be assessed receive the same assessment regardless of any particular property characteristic. • For property type 1 listed above, the properties to be assessed will receive an assessment amount equal to the flat rate for which rehabilitation type the project is utilizing (mill and overlay, full depth reclamation, or reconstruction). The flat rate is established on the City’s Fee Schedule, which is updated and approved by the City Council annually. The flat rate utilized for a project will be the rate that is in effect on the date the assessment role is adopted. • For property type 2 listed above, the City shall use the calculation method that creates a reasonable distribution of assessments across the entire roll. 270 Page 2 of 5 • Where reasonable to do so, when more than one “neighborhood” is contained within the same project, the assessment roll may be calculated per each neighborhood, rather than the total project. This would not apply to property type 1 as they would all receive a flat rate assessment. • Unless otherwise exempt, public property, government land, private associations, schools, churches, and non-profit property uses shall be included in the assessment roll. • Commercial property, and Medium and High-Density Residential property shall be assessed based on a reasonable determination of vehicular traffic generated. • A duplex that is located on a single parcel, shall be considered two units. Generally, when traffic volumes are used as the assessment methodology, a Residential Equivalent Unit (REU) or similar other unit assessment relationship shall be used. NEW CONSTRUCTION: 100% assessed to all benefitting properties. New construction is typically paid for by the development itself and therefore not formally assessed. In some instances, the City will undertake proactive installation of public utilities to unserved areas and then assess the benefiting properties, or establish an improvement district/area with deferred access charges to cover the cost for the added service. In other instances, properties may petition the City directly for the installation of the public improvements in which case 100% of the costs are paid for by the benefiting properties. Assessable Costs Include: • Construction of a new public street, trail and/or sidewalk. • Installation of public water main, storm sewer and/or sanitary sewer system, including appurtenances (structures, valves, hydrants, lift stations, etc.), where it did not previously exist. • Indirect costs (design, legal, and administration fees). Notes: • Oversizing of streets and utilities beyond the city’s standard details, or what is needed for the development itself, are paid for by the city and are typically not assessed. RECONSTRUCTION/REHABILITATION: 40% assessed to all benefitting properties, unless a flat rate methodology is utilized. When determining the rehabilitation method to be used, the following decision matrix shall be used for planning purposes: Question If Yes If No Does the street need to change its intended use; change to meet our current standard (width, thickness, C&G, drainage, etc.); and/or has it met its useful service life (~50 yrs)? Plan for Reconstruction Move to next question Is the pavement condition OCI between 0 and 29? Plan for Reconstruction Move to next question Is the pavement condition OCI between 30 and 59? Plan for FDR Move to next question Is the pavement condition OCI greater than 60? Plan for M&O n/a Notes: • Once a project is under design, an engineering analysis will be undertaken to determine the appropriate rehabilitation method. 271 Page 3 of 5 • Two inches (2”) shall be the standard depth for a mill and overlay unless particular circumstances exist. Under such circumstances, the flat rate will not be adjusted. Assessable Costs Include: • Pavement associated with public streets, trails and/or sidewalks. This includes draintile, geotechnical (soil corrections, etc.), and other improvements needed to support the function of the pavement structure. o In situations where there is no existing trail or sidewalk infrastructure, but such improvements are being added by the project, the costs associated with the addition shall not be assessed unless particular circumstances exist such as when the benefit of the new infrastructure is of primary benefit to the assessable properties only. • Curb and gutter, including curb impacted solely by utility improvements. • Driveway pavement and aprons directly affected by the project work. • Storm Sewer and appurtenances associated with street drainage. • Multi-Modal improvements such as ADA ramps and actuated pedestrian crossings such as Rectangular Rapid- Flashing Beacons (RRFB’s). • Signing and striping. • Retaining walls required within the Right-of-Way. • Tree removal and/or landscaping improvements directly affected by the project work. • Applicable percentage of indirect costs (design, legal, and admin fees). Notes: • If a residential property has access from a collector or otherwise oversized street, the assessment amount shall be based on an equitable formula compared to a typical local roadway, including normalizing to a city standard width, typical street pavement section, typical lot width, and other applicable factors. This normalization does not apply to a flat rate assessment. • Pavement projects on streets that provide direct access to Chanhassen property(s) that are being implemented by an adjacent municipality shall not be assessed to the Chanhassen property(s) unless the adjacent municipality is assessing the benefiting property in their jurisdiction as part of the project. • Replacement, maintenance, or repair of existing public water main, sanitary sewer, and indirect stormwater management infrastructure shall not be assessed. The City will pay 100% of these improvement costs out of the associated enterprise fund. REGULAR MAINTENANCE: Benefiting properties are not assessed. • Activities Include: Pavement patching, pothole filling, crack sealing, chip sealing, sealcoating, sign maintenance, lighting, and pavement markings. PAYMENT OPTIONS • Assessments can be paid in full up-front with no finance charge, otherwise the assessment will be certified to the County and added to annual property taxes with interest. • If elected to add to annual property taxes, the balance can be paid off at any time during the term if requested by the property owner. • Interest will be charged to property owners who choose to not pay their assessments in full by November 15th in the year the special assessment is levied. The interest rate will be equal to the yield on the 7-year Treasury Note on the date the special assessment roll is adopted, plus 1.0%. 272 Page 4 of 5 • Unless approved otherwise by the City Council, the maximum financing term for assessments shall be as follows: o $0-$500 1 year o $501-$2,500 5 years o $2,501-$5,000 8 years o $5,001-$15,000 10 years o $15,001 and above 15 years HARDSHIP ASSESSMENT DEFERAL FOR SENIORS, DISABLED, OR MILITARY PERSONS Minnesota Statute §435.193 allows a statutory city to establish standards and guidelines to defer special assessments. A deferment of a special assessment for a homesteaded property may be granted if: (1) The property is owned by a person 65 years of age or older or retired by virtue of a permanent and total disability* for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments; or (2) The property is owned by a person who is a member of the Minnesota National Guard or other military reserves who is ordered into active military service, as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 190.05, subdivision 5b or 5c, as stated in the person’s military orders, for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. The deferment is not an elimination of the assessment, but rather a temporary pause of paying the assessment until the hardship no longer exists. Interest on deferred assessments shall be subject to and charged at the interest rate set by the City Council on its resolution adopting the special assessment, and such interest shall accrue on said principal until the special assessment is paid in full. The option of the property owner to defer the payment of special assessments shall terminate and all amounts accumulated plus accrued interest (compounded annually) shall become due and payable within sixty (60) days upon the occurrence of any of the following events: (1) The sale, transfer, or subdivision of the property or any part thereof, or the property is in any way conveyed to another person; or (2) The subject property loses its homestead status for any reason; or (3) The death of the owner qualified for deferral status unless a surviving spouse is eligible for benefits hereunder; or (4) If for any reason the City Council determines that there would be no hardship in requiring an immediate or partial payment of the deferred special assessment. To request deferral of a special assessment, the property owner must request a deferment on the form prescribed by the City Clerk within thirty (30) days after the adoption of the improvement assessment by the City Council. The applicant must submit a copy of the federal income tax return from the year prior to the assessment to verify that all sources of income do not exceed the very low-income limits for the Carver County area as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The property must be the applicant’s principal residence and classified on the real estate tax rolls as the applicant’s homestead. City staff will review the application and if the applicant meets the standards and guidelines above, the deferment will be granted. The City Council has the discretion to make the determination that a hardship exists based on exceptional and unusual circumstances not covered by the standards and guidelines where the determination is made in a 273 Page 5 of 5 nondiscriminatory manner and does not give the applicant an unreasonable preference or advantage over other applicants. *Permanent and total disability shall have the same definition for purposes of assessment deferral as is used for social security. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS A Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document addressing the most common questions concerning assessments is attached to this policy and can also be found on the City’s website. 274 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item Lake Minnewashta Slow No Wake Public Hearing File No.N/A Item No: G.2 Agenda Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Prepared By Joe Seidl, Water Resources Engineer Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION The Chanhassen City Council should hold a public hearing to consider modifying the Slow-No- Wake Elevation of Lake Minnewashta and associated City Ordinance modification language to be submitted to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for review. Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Operational Excellence SUMMARY A Citizen Action Request was received by the City on July 14, 2025 requesting a change to the existing Slow-No Wake Elevation (SNW) for Lake Minnewashta. The request is to raise the SNW elevation from the current elevation of 945.0 to the FEMA 100-yr flood elevation of 945.9. The topic was discussed at the City Council work session held on October 13, 2025. The direction from council at that work session was to evaluate raising the SNW elevation to 945.3, and to reduce the waiting time of lifting the no wake restriction down from 3 days to 1 day. Staff has prepared a report giving an overview of the request. A draft ordinance modifying City Code is also attached. A change to the City Code regulating the SNW elevation will need to be submitted to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) for review and approval. If the City Council chooses to move 275 forward with a request to change the code, staff will forward the necessary documents to the DNR for review. If approved by the DNR, the City Council would consider adopting the ordinance at a future city council meeting, ahead of next summer's boating season. BACKGROUND See Report DISCUSSION See Report BUDGET N/A RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS City Code Language Lake Minnewashta Overview Overview: Slow No Wake Minnewashta Ordinance Update Water Level Data Lake Minnewashta County slow-no wake data Slow No-Wake Restrictions 10.23 LakeOwners Survey 276 277 278 Chaska RoadPrairi e Flo w e r BlvdRed Cedar Point Rd Les le e Curve5Gunflint TrailVassermanPlace 2MillCreekLNWashta Bay Ct Highway 41Highover LaneChes Mar DrLandingsCrtHighoverCrtS Linden C ir P a i s le y P a th 1Moccasin Trail C e n t u r y Trail Tristan Dr Water Tower Place 77t h St D artm o u t h D r L a k e H a r r ison Rd 7Dogwood Ave3 Coach Place W hite Oak Lane Wy n s o n g La n eMelodyLaneMaple DrC i r c l e W 78th S t S traw b e r r y L a ne Dogwood Rd4 Autumn Ridge Ct 5 Autumn Ridge Ln 6 Autumn Ridge WayCartwayLane 1 Harvest Lane!Rock Island Ln TanagersPointL a ke Lucy R oad South C e d ar Driv e Stratford RidgeGalpin BlvdTulipCtW 78th Stre e t P ip e w o o d C rt HarrisonHillTrailMinnewashtaParkwayStone CreekCrt H ig h c re s tC irPi n e wo o dCir c l eHa n c o c k P l a c e Tanagers Ln4 Coach Dr F awnHi l l Cou r t !Village Cir ForrestCirW 65th St ForestRidgeCircleFawnHillR d Highover Crt N 3 Corporate Place W 82nd St Oakwood Ridge M a p le w o o d C ir6 Village Place Pinehur s t D rCentury BlvdFir TreeManchesterDriveMeado w Lane 6 4th StState H w y 7 Galpin BlvdLakeri d g e RoadTanadoona Drive StoneCreekRdGalpi n CrtElm TreeS t o n e Cr eek Lane EBentz CtRed O a k L a n e L ongacres D rJoshuaCir Hunt e r Dr HarrisonHillCourt Rogers Ct BridleCreek Circle 3Tri s t an KnollLone Cedar Lan e A mb erw ood Ln Ironwood 6 Pa d d o c k Ln BentBowTrailGreenbriar AveHighover Way 6HazeltineBlvd(Hwy41)Arrowhead Ln 3 State H w y 5 Kings Road !Village Ln Bar b erryCirCentury BoulevardC o u lt e r B lv d Glendale Dr W 62nd St S a n d piperTrailMaje s t ic Way Glend a l e D r W 78th Street Melody Hill Circle 3 Autumn Ridge Avenue A co rn LaneCrestview Dr !Village Crt L a ke Lucy R o a d Leslee C u r v e 2 Coach Lane Hallgren Lane Bent Bow Trai l Fore st AveB rinker StFawn Hill RdR e n a i s s a n c e C o u r t K ir kw o od Ci r 78th S t W Sommer Gate !Century Circle Century Ct. Century Place North M a n or Lukewood Dr Highwood Dr Melo d y Hill Highover DriveHills d al eC rt Red C e d a r Cove Ches M a r F a r m R d Crestview Dr (CSAH 15)Ridgehill RoadWestwood DrArboretumVill ageCircleStone Cree k D rCypressDrivePip e w o o d Cir A rb o retum D riveB o u ld e r R oad12 Ridgevie w WayStratfordLn 2 Maple Shores Dr Hawthorne Va s ser man Trail Century BlvdCrimson Bay RdLand in g s D riveA r b o r e t u m B oulevard Al d e r W a y 1 S h o r e Drive Coulter BlvdLake Harriso n Circle W 82nd St1 Coach Court M in n e w a s hta C o urt W 7 8th StreetArborLane Lym an Blvd (CSAH 1 8 ) Gunflint Tr ail T i m berwood Dr Wash t a Bay R o ad4 Windsor CtW a l nut Cu r v e W hite Oak Lane Maple Cir CountryO aks RdRe d F o x LodgepolePoint4Pipewood LaneNorthwoodCourtHickory R o a d !Arboretum Village Ln, Pl, Crt, & Crv Piper Rid g e L n 5 Brenden CourtOrioleAvePipewood CurveChurch RoadCountryOaksRoadGunflintCourt Ridgeview Point F a wn Hill Rd CrocusCt1StratfordBlvd 82nd Street BenwoodCircle7 Arboretum Village Trl Beacon CourtMeadowCourt H igh o v e r T railCountry Oaks Dr S t one C r e e k Lane W Lon g a c re s D rMi n n ewashtaWo odsDrMurray Hill RoadS o u t h e r n C r t 2 Bridle Creek Tra ilO r chard La n e M a p le w o o d T e rra ceJuniper Ave.Murray Hill Crt 2 Harvest Way 5 Village Street Che st n u tLaneLake Virginia Brendan Pond Lake Harrison Lake St. Joe Lake Minnewashta Minnewashta Regional Park Chanhassen Nature Preserve Chanhassen Recreation Center MN Landscape Arboretum Bluff Creek Preserve Independent School District 11 Independent School District 276 Lake Ann Park Preserve µ0 1,200 Feet 0 0.1 0.2 Mile Lake Minnewashta Overview Map City of Chanhassen Date: 10/9/2025 Path: K:\Departments\Engineering\Lake Minnewashta Watershed\Lake Minnewashta Watershed.aprx - 10/9/2025* Approximate Location Based on LIDAR Data Legend Storm Manholes Storm Inlets Storm Discharge Points 945' (Slow - No Wake Elevation)* 945.9' (100 Year Floodplain Contour)* Storm Culverts Storm Gravity Mains Storm Detention Areas Lake Minnewashta Lakeshed Outlet Channel Public Boat Launch 279 Slow-No-Wake Restriction on Lake Minnewashta I. Introduction This report reviews the history, purpose, and current conditions of Lake Minnewashta’s slow-no wake (SNW) elevation and provides considerations for potential adjustments. Slow-no wake regulations temporarily restrict watercraft speeds when water levels are elevated, requiring boats to operate at the slowest speed necessary (approximately 5 MPH) to maintain steerage and minimize wake. The primary objectives are to protect public safety, reduce shoreline erosion, safeguard docks and private property, and preserve water quality. Lake Minnewashta’s SNW elevation is currently set at 945.0 feet which is 0.5 feet higher than the Ordinary High-Water Level (OHWL) of 944.5 determined by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The SNW elevation was set in 2019 and is based on a 10-year water level analysis, shoreline and erosion review, and public engagement. This benchmark reflects relatively uncommon high-water marks from prolonged wet weather and/or large storm events, and provides a standard that attempts to balance recreation, property protection, and environmental stewardship. During the past two years (2024 and 2025) rainfall events caused the SNW restriction to be placed on area lakes during the 4th of July Holiday. As a result of the untimely nature, City Council and Staf received feedback from residents concerned with the SNW ordinance and triggering elevation. A Citizen Action Request with a proposal to raise the SNW elevation on Lake Minnewashta to the FEMA 100-year Floodplain elevation of 945.9 was submitted on July 14, 2025. II. Lake Minnewashta Overview Lake Minnewashta spans approximately 700 acres with an average depth of 15 feet and a maximum depth near 70 feet. Its shoreline stretches roughly 8.9 miles. The lake supports aquatic plants, fish habitat, and recreational activities. Water quality is generally good, though invasive species such as Eurasian watermilfoil and zebra mussels are present. Localized shoreline erosion has been observed. Shoreline erosion and watershed nutrient loading occasionally afect water clarity. An overview map of the Lake Minnewashta area is included in the appendix for reference. 280 The shoreline features a mix of developed residential areas and natural sections. Lawns, docks, and riprap dominate private property, while public parkland and undeveloped areas retain native vegetation bufers. Recreational use is diverse, centered on Lake Minnewashta Regional Park, which ofers swimming, boating, fishing, trails, and seasonal activities including ice fishing and winter trail use. Boating is popular both from adjacent property owners, but also visitors using the public boat launch. Pleasure boating and other high-wake activities have increased in popularity recently, highlighting the need to balance recreational demand with environmental protection. Lake Minnewashta tends to have longer SNW enforcement periods despite a higher elevation threshold compared to Lotus Lake, which uses the OHWL as a benchmark. This is due to the watershed characteristics. Lake Minnewashta has a larger watershed with less impervious surface and more upland storage compared to Lotus Lake which results in a slower draining system. III. Historical Review The first slow-no wake ordinance in Chanhassen was adopted on July 11, 1983 (Ordinance No. 73), establishing speed restrictions on marked slow-no wake areas. Subsequent amendments addressed evolving community needs, environmental concerns, and regulatory standards. • 2003, Ordinance No. 356: Updated provisions and state law integration. • 2006, Ordinances No. 418 & 419: Refinements for specific lakes including Lotus Lake and Lake Susan. • 2019, Ordinance No. 642: Trigger thresholds updated on Chanhassen Lakes, including Lake Minnewashta set to 945.0 • 2020, Ordinance No. 655: Further alignment with hydrologic benchmarks and DNR approvals. 281 Current slow-no wake elevations for nearby lakes: Lake SNW Elevation Lotus Lake 896.30’ Lake Lucy 957.24’ Lake Minnewashta 945.00’ Lake Susan 882.50’ Changes to SNW thresholds can be made anytime via a formal process, including public hearings, ordinance publishing, and a 120-day review by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). IV. Slow-No Wake Elevation Determination Slow–No Wake elevations are established to protect shorelines, property, and water quality during periods of high water by temporarily restricting boat speeds to minimize wave action. The elevation is determined through analysis of site-specific conditions for each lake or water body, including shoreline characteristics, adjacent land use, vegetation, water level history, and the relationship to nearby infrastructure. Because every lake responds diferently to high-water events, SNW elevations are evaluated individually rather than using a uniform standard across all water bodies. Public input plays a key role in this process. Before a SNW restriction can be adopted or modified, DNR rules require that a public hearing be held to gather feedback from afected property owners, recreational users, and other stakeholders. This input helps local governments and the DNR better understand community perspectives, lake use patterns, and potential impacts before finalizing an ordinance or rule change. Typically, the established SNW elevation falls above the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) - the typical upper limit of natural lake levels - but below the FEMA 1% annual chance flood elevation (commonly referred to as the 100-year floodplain). Setting the restriction within this range ensures that boating limitations are triggered before flooding occurs, providing a balance between recreational access and the protection of shorelines, habitat, and adjacent properties. The 100-year floodplain elevation is established through detailed hydrologic and hydraulic modeling using synthetic storm events based on historical precipitation data. In 282 Chanhassen, a 100-year storm equates to approximately 7.5 inches of rainfall within 24 hours. These events are rare and often result in emergency conditions, including property damage and street flooding. In contrast, SNW elevations are typically set closer to the OHWL - the point along a waterbody where riparian vegetation transitions from aquatic to terrestrial species. Aquatic plants near the OHWL are naturally adapted to withstand periodic submersion and wave action, helping maintain shoreline stability. SNW elevations from nearby lakes were reviewed for comparison. Within nearby Counties, 22 lakes were identified with published SNW, OHWL, and 100-year FEMA Floodplain elevations. The vast majority of these lakes (19 out of 22) have SNW elevations set below the FEMA Floodplain elevation. Most (11 of 22) have SNW elevations established between the OHWL and the 100-year floodplain, while the remaining 8 have SNW elevations at or below the OHWL. Detailed SNW elevation data for area lakes is provided in the appendix. The intent of a SNW restriction is not to prevent flooding, but to reduce wave-related erosion and property damage during temporary periods of elevated water levels while maintaining a fair balance between environmental protection and lake recreation. V. Data Collection and Trends Water levels are continuously monitored by the City and the watershed district using real- time sensors. When data suggests that SNW thresholds may be exceeded, City staf confirm the readings through manual measurements taken from established benchmarks. It is important to note that water level data carries an estimated margin of error of approximately 0.05 feet. This variation can result from instrument or GPS calibration errors, as well as physical and human factors such as wave action and measurement technique. According to the ordinance, the SNW restriction is enacted when the water level exceeds elevation 945.0 feet. In practice, City staf must observe a level of at least 945.05 feet (rounded to 945.1) to confirm this threshold. This margin of error and the use of significant digits were considered in the water level analysis presented in this report. Water level data and SNW restriction frequency of Lake Minnewashta was compared to Lotus Lake, which is the most similar Lake in Chanhassen with respect to recreational use. Graphical depictions of the data are included in the appendix. Analysis of the past 10 years shows: 283 Lake SNW Enforcement Water Level Exceeded Threshold % of Boating Season Restricted Lake Minnewashta 2 times (since 2019) 5 times 10% Lotus Lake 3 times (since 2019) Analysis of the past 20 years shows: 6 times 5% Lake SNW Enforcement Water Level Exceeded Threshold % of Boating Season Restricted Lake Minnewashta 2 times (since 2019) 11 times 12% Lotus Lake 3 times (since 2019) 12 times 4% An analysis of Lake Minnewashta’s SNW elevations over the past 20 years was conducted to estimate how often the restriction would be triggered and what percentage of the boating season it would remain in efect. This analysis assumes that the waiting period to lift the restriction is reduced from three days to 24 hours. As shown in the table below, even small adjustments in the SNW elevation can result in substantial diferences in the frequency and duration of restrictions. Proposed SNW Elevation (ft) Number of SNW Events Number of SNW Days % of Boating Season 945.0 11 322 10% 945.1 10 154 5% 945.2 5 87 3% 945.3 1 61 2% 945.9 1 5 <1% 284 VI. Impacts of Raising the SNW Elevation Raising the SNW elevation could have ecological consequences. These impacts reflect what could happen under certain conditions, but a modest and well-managed rise in lake level would not automatically cause them. 1. Shoreline Erosion Risks o Higher water levels can destabilize shorelines and riparian habitats. o Vegetation critical for sediment stabilization may be submerged, increasing erosion and sedimentation. 2. Habitat and Water Quality Efects o Riparian vegetation subjected to wave action may die, disrupting wildlife habitats along the lake shore. o Loss of riparian vegetation decreases natural filtration, potentially degrading water quality. 3. Sediment and Phosphorus Loading o Disturbance of shoreline sediments can release phosphorus, fueling algal blooms and eutrophication. o Water clarity may decrease, and nutrient cycling may shift, afecting overall lake ecology. Property Owner Impacts Timely SNW enforcement protects docks, riprap, and shorelines, preventing erosion and sediment/nutrient runof that can degrade water quality. Delayed activation or higher thresholds increase the risk of property damage and potential repairs. Conservative SNW thresholds help preserve both environmental and community assets. While raising the SNW elevation would extend recreational opportunities, it can introduce more long-term risks to shoreline stability and aquatic ecosystem health. Alternative measures like shoreline restoration, riparian bufers, and stormwater management may mitigate impacts while maintaining recreational flexibility. VII. Recreational Impacts SNW restrictions afect boating activities like wakeboarding, tubing, and water skiing. Targeted restrictions preserve partial recreational use while minimizing erosion and 285 property damage. Adaptive management approaches—seasonal or temporary adjustments—can balance recreational access with environmental protection. VIII. Resident Outreach City staf conducted an outreach campaign to gather input on the existing SNW elevation for Lake Minnewashta. Engagement eforts included hosting a public open house on October 9th, 2025, to share background information and collect feedback, as well as distributing an online survey targeted to lakeshore property owners to better understand resident perspectives and experiences. To ensure broad community awareness, staf implemented a communications campaign through the City’s website, social media platforms, and mailed notices to afected residents. The information collected through these eforts will help inform City Council’s consideration of whether adjustments to the current SNW elevation are warranted. Analysis of the feedback revealed difering opinions among residents. Some supported raising the triggering elevation or removing the SNW restriction entirely, while others felt the current elevation is appropriate or even too high. Of the 102 surveys and letters received, 70 respondents (69%) favored raising the SNW elevation, while 32 respondents (31%) preferred keeping it the same or lowering it. Among Lake Minnewashta lakeshore property owners specifically, 52 respondents (75%) supported raising the elevation, compared to 17 respondents (25%) who did not. Residents who supported a higher SNW elevation expressed that the current level is too conservative and unnecessarily restricts lake use during Minnesota’s short boating season. They also noted that shoreline impacts from boating activity are minimal compared to natural occurrences such as ice heaves. Conversely, residents who favored maintaining the current elevation emphasized the importance of balancing recreation with environmental protection. Some, particularly those in low-lying areas, reported experiencing shoreline erosion and property damage from wave action during periods of high water. Respondents from the City’s survey expressed broad support for reducing the duration the lake must remain below the SNW elevation before the restriction can be lifted. IX. Regulatory and Legal Framework Minnesota’s SNW ordinance process ensures transparency and compliance: 286 1. Prepare a Water Surface Use Management (WSUM) worksheet and map. 2. Draft a necessity statement explaining reasons for changes. 3. Draft ordinance language specifying boundaries, triggers, enforcement, and penalties. 4. Conduct a public hearing for community input. 5. Submit materials to the DNR for a 120-day review. Approval from the DNR is required before formal adoption. This structured process balances local interests, statewide standards, and environmental protection. X. Options for Council Consideration • Maintain current SNW elevation: Status quo; frequency and duration of restrictions expected to remain similar to what was observed in the past • Lower the elevation: More frequent restrictions, stronger shoreline protection. • Raise the elevation: Fewer restrictions, greater recreational access, increased environmental risk. • Adaptive management: o Reduce the number of consecutive days a lake is lower than the threshold from 3 days to 1 day. o Temporary or seasonal adjustments with periodic review. o Targeted permanent SNW areas in critical areas XI. City Council Work Session The Chanhassen City Council discussed the SNW topic during its work session on October 13, 2025. At that meeting, staf presented information from the draft report and reviewed preliminary survey results. Following the discussion, the City Council expressed that the current SNW elevation for Lake Minnewashta may be overly restrictive and directed staf to prepare a draft ordinance amendment to raise the SNW elevation to 945.3 feet and reduce the waiting period to lift the restriction from 3-days to 24 hours. 287 XII. Discussion The analysis of Lake Minnewashta demonstrates that there is a relatively narrow range of elevations at which a SNW restriction is appropriate. The current (945.0) and proposed (945.3) SNW elevations are near the lower and upper limits of this range respectively, reflecting the need to balance shoreline and property protection with recreational access. There is no exact formula for determining SNW elevations; instead, they are established through site-specific evaluation of factors and public input. Each lake responds diferently to high-water events, requiring an individual assessment rather than a uniform standard. Precision in defining the SNW elevation is critical. Establishing the restriction to the tenth (945.X) decimal place helps account for measurement error, variations in water level readings, and natural fluctuations, ensuring that the restriction is triggered appropriately without being overly conservative or lenient. A proposed elevation of 945.3 feet would rarely be reached (only observed 1 time during the last 20 years) during the historic flooding observed in 2014, making the restriction infrequent and inconsistent with observed patterns on comparable lakes such as Lotus Lake. In contrast, maintaining the current SNW elevation of 945.0 would preserve the status quo which resulted in approximately 12 % of the boating season being restricted when analyzing the last 10 years of data. A small increase to 945.1 feet would reduce the number of restriction days by approximately half which demonstrates how minor adjustments can have a significant efect on restriction duration. Observed damage on Lake Minnewashta during periods of high water underscores the importance of maintaining SNW restrictions at an elevation that protects the shoreline without unnecessarily limiting recreational boating. XIII. Appendices • Historical lake level data • Lake Minnewashta Overview Map • Comparison of SNW thresholds on nearby lakes • Sample ordinance language 288 289 Lake SNW OHWL FEMA SNW-OHW FEMA-SNW Crooked 861.6 862.1 863.4 -0.5 1.8 Waconia 963.1 963.1 963.54 0 0.44 Lotus 896.3 896.3 897.84 0 1.54 Susan 882.5 881.8 885 0.7 2.5 Minnewashta 945 944.5 945.9 0.5 0.9 Lucy 957.24 956.1 957.24 1.14 0 Byllesby 858.2 856.6 860 1.6 1.8 Crystal 934 934.5 934.8 -0.5 0.8 Marion 983.6 983.1 985 0.5 1.4 Bryant Lake 852.6 851.38 853 1.22 0.4 Sarah 981.1 979.9 981 1.2 -0.1 Independence 958.2 957.5 960 0.7 1.8 Medicine 889.4 889.1 890 0.3 0.6 Upper Prior 903.9 903.9 907 0 3.1 Lower Prior 903.9 903.9 907 0 3.1 Spring 912.8 912.8 914 0 1.2 Gervais 860 859.64 863 0.36 3 Long 866.22 864.93 869 1.29 2.78 Island 947 946.76 946 0.24 -1 Minnetonka 929.8 929.41 931.1 0.39 1.3 Cross 935 933.74 940 1.26 5 Elk 962.2 962.2 969 0 6.8 290 Submission DateLives on Lake MinnewashtaHow do you use the lake (boating, fishing, kayaking, waterskiing, wake-boating, etc.)?How would you describe the water quality of Lake Minnewashta?What do you think about the current slow-no-wake elevation, do you feel it is at the right level? What are your thoughts about slow-no-wake restrictions in general? Any other comments?10/13/2025 13:33 yes boating, fishing, kayaking, swimming, viewDeclining this year due to runoff from spring and early summer rains. Minnewashta is a C+ lake as rated by the DNR and it should be higher. Future generations are at risk No wake level doesn't matter without out reasonable boating regulations. No wake level doesn't matter without out reasonable boating regulations. City engineering and Council must engage with LMPA, the true stewards of the lake. The lake is as healthy as it is thanks to LMPA.10/13/2025 4:55I have lived across from the lake for 29 years has always been considered, and continues to be one of the cleanest Lake Waters in the entire greater metro area. I mean, it still In general, I think no wake restrictions would help preserve Shoreline and shallow lake beds.what’s frustrating is that white boat owners think that they have a right to do what they want.10/15/2025 7:07 Fishing, paddle boarding, canoeing, beach use, swimming Average No. Feels it’s too high and is causing shoreline damage.In favor, it needs to be balanced. But not allowing one use of the lake to usurp other activities or the ecosystem as a whole.10/14/2025 18:21 yesPontoon boat, ski boat (not wake surf boat), kayak, paddle board, swimming/floating. We live on the lake.Good, but we have more weed clean-up than we used to. I suspect the large increase in wake surf boats means more, deeper props chopping more vegetation and stirring It should not be set higher. I disagree with comments that it should be changed because it's "arbitrary." There's a logical narrow range. Setting it at flood zone level would be absurd.Sometimes necessary. It appears that no one likes being restricted from anything, ever, but data-based analyses and common sense must prevail for lake quality and the preservation of lakeshore.It's important to maintain no wake restrictions. The currently established level is appropriate. Reducing the 3 days to 1 day is probably misguided due to risk of on-off-on-off, etc. Maybe 2 days.10/14/2025 14:11 yesWe have a pontoon and a small ski boat. We ski, occasionally tow a tube, cruise in the pontoon. We also kayak on either a sit atop or our Hobie pedal kayak, and paddle board.Great water quality for an urban lake, although it seems to be weedier that it used to be. There's so much more wake surfing now, its a lot more work to maintain the beach because of chopped up weedsWhen no-wake was declared both in 2024 and 2025, our level lot was already slightly flooded and wakes lapped up over the riprap and onto our yard. If it's raised, we'll be under water. They're not fun, but are necessary to protect both shorelines and water quality. We respect the science/engineering and don't want to trade short term fun for long-term lake health & property values.10/13/2025 19:24 yes Boating, kayaking, swimming Very good Yes very Important Enforcement of no-wake in recent years has been lacking10/13/2025 14:00 Boating, fishingThe water quality is really good. Clear water and the fish species seem to be healthy.Yes I feel like it is at the right level and do not recommend any changes. If I were in charge I would limit wake surfing to certain hours and areas of the lake.My perception is that people who want the restriction less strict are reacting to the last couple of rainy summers where the elevation for no wake is met. Feels like recency bias.10/12/2025 13:23 yes Boating, fishing, paddle boarding, swimming, water skiing, Good Yes Helps protect shoreline erosion & protect homeowners property 10/11/2025 15:43 yes SailingQuite turbid. I have lived on the lake since 1997 and this year was one of the worst for water qualityI am no fan of Wake boats. They are completely inharmonious with nature. I would make the level more restrictive than it currently is. Not all boaters follow rules and it only takes a They are imperative. If people want to surf, go to the ocean. These boats are incredibly destructive: They erode shoreline, stir the bottom, guzzle gas and transfer invasive species in their ballast tanks.10/11/2025 9:22 yesMy wife and I are both water sports enthusiasts and use the lake very frequently for pontooning, skiing, tubing, swimming, kayaking and just cooling off. For a metro area lake, it is above average but this year, water clarity has degraded from years past perhaps due to high water levels and an increase in the number of surf boats. Both are damagingI believe it is at the right level. At 945.0', the water is above the OHWL and affecting my shore vegetation. Wave action from boats undercuts and erodes my shore. I have lost feet over the yearsI wish we didn't need them but they are necessary to protect the water quality and property of land owners. Going to a one day waiting period will reduce the recreational impact. We have spent thousands of dollars planting a shoreline buffer. If we raise the trigger, we will need to spend thousands more to further harden our shoreline. The wave damage is real.10/8/2025 22:11 yes Pontoon, waterski, swim Good No Not strict enough and not enforced.10/7/2025 19:06 Fishing, boating Poor compared to when I moved to the address shown in Yes It is useful for controlling shoreline erosion thus lake water 10/7/2025 13:50 We use our association beach lot in Minnewashta Heights Fair Yes, slow-no-wake protects the shorelines and the lake water They are good as long as based on sound science10/6/2025 9:27 Kayaking, paddle boarding Clear but sadly because of zebra musclesI definitely appreciate the no wake restrictions as the wake surf boats create immense waves that affect the shoreline even when the boat itself is hundreds of feet away. Slow and no wake restrictions are probably unfair but I think it’s absolutely necessary to restrict wake surfing. This sport is doing so much damage to the lake . Wake surfing is so damaging to the lake and so disruptive to those who like kayaking, paddle boarding that I find it unbelievable that we don’t put the restrictions on them! 10/5/2025 8:39 yes Boating, fishing, kayaking, wakeboarding About rightIt is a good ordinance and protects shorelines and damage to boats tied to docksRules are only good if enforced which does not happen. The is no enforcement on Lake Minnewashta. There should be an ordinance for 10/4/2025 15:14 Mostly fishing, kayaking Acceptable for fishing, kayaking The elevation is good for most uses, but not protective of the lake for wake boats.Think they're an important tool to help protect the shorelines. While they can be inconvenient, it's much worse when all the natural 10/4/2025 15:01 Kayaking and pontooning Weedy I think the current level is fine and should stay the sameI think it’s important to protect lake property from erosion and there should be more patrols when a slow no wake is required.I think there should be more restrictions on how many of the large wake producing boats that are allowed on the lake and more distance from 10/4/2025 14:51 yes Boating, lakeshore beach Excellent Yes, current elevation feels appropriate Good to have to protect shoreline. No wake near shore makes sense. Ability to have a few very specific event exceptions (ie annual waterski 10/3/2025 10:11 yes boating, kayaking, waterskiing, tubing, swimmingThe water is very clear unquiet days. The water is very dirty on days of south winds and/or heavy boat usage, especially on weekends and holidays. for example the Yes, they are at the right level. Please do not change the slow-no-wake restrictions.The current slow-no-wake restrictions only impact wake surf boats for about two weeks. But during the higher water levels the shore line is impacted the most with the waves they produce. 10/1/2025 20:52 yesWe have lakefront property with a beach. We kayak, canoe, swim, and use our pontoon boat on the lake. It is okay but has had a lot more weeds the past few years and does not seem as clear as it was just 5 years ago. I think it is currently at the right level. I think they are important and necessary to preserve shorelines and maintain a healthy habitat for wildlife. I would support an allowance I think it is vital to protect our shorelines from erosion. Distance from shore by wake boats is crucial to help protect shorelines. Preserving 10/1/2025 20:03 Boating, swimming, fishing Average It feels correct. If any change is needed, the lake level elevation could be lowered (not raised) to better protect lake health and reduce shoreline erosion Great! Protects shoreline, aquatic life, and water quality &is safer for non-motorized use. A recent study by the U of M shows large waves hurt overall lake health (long lasting impacts)It seems irresponsible to loosen the requirements for slow no-wake. The level is set to protect the lake. Lake & boats still fun now, just big waves at responsible water levels. Increase enforcement10/1/2025 19:33 fishing, swimming good good I think there appropriate10/1/2025 18:31 Kayak, fishing g, paddleboard Average, could be a lot better. To much run off from yards full of chemicals. And road run off. Needs more natural I dont think it should be any lower. The no wake level is important. I have seen a lot of shoreline erosion over the years They are good and need to be enforced.10/1/2025 17:40 yesI own a home on the lake, we actively use the lake for boating (pontoon), canoeing, kayaking, paddle boarding, and Usually very good. Seemed like it was not quite as clean this year as it's been in the past. Going down hill the last I feel it is the right level. I feel they are very important to enforce. There's been a great deal of debate regarding wake boats. There's no question that these types I'm not against wake boats, everyone deserves to enjoy the lake. But with this type of boat becoming more common, I feel it's even more 10/1/2025 17:20 yes Boating, kayaking B minus At right level I support them for protection of water quality and lakeshore 10/1/2025 17:09 Paddle boarding and swimming Clear and interesting mix of emergent vegetation About right Support them. The lake is much calmer when in place and more 10/1/2025 15:48 paddling/fishing acceptableNo. As a resident whose main lake recreation is paddling, I find these smaller community lakes that allow wake boats are too dangerous and exclude my use.As Chanhassen and the surrounding area grows in population, small lakes should stay inclusive to all. Without slow-no-wake rules, wake boats monopolize them and exclude paddlers and anglers.Do Lotus Lake next! I have association dock access for this lake and it is CONSTANTLY disruptive to paddlers with just a few wake boats - can't get away from them & don't feel safe10/1/2025 15:30 fishing generally acceptable generally acceptableI am in favor of restrictions to ensure the health of our lakes and shorelines. More restrictive restrictions will also ensure the diversity As wake boating increases in popularity, opportunities for other boaters decrease because of the large and dangerous disturbances these 10/1/2025 15:15 boating, Kayaking Average yes Protect the shoreline is a priority 291 10/9/2025 yes Fishing, boating, tubing, water skiing, kayak, paddle boat, jetskiWe have owned property for decades and the water quality has significantly decreased. Still a pretty clean lake but weeds have continued to impact areas more each year.Yes, I (we) agree with the current level and with current 3 day wait.Restrictions are in place to protect the lake and properties on the lake and are necessary.Would like to make sure wake boat restrictions are at 500ft and 20ft depth. Also enforcement for going too close to other recreational types (kayaks, fishing, etc)10/9/2025 yes Boating, kayaking -live on the lake 870' shorelineGood but not great B Grade, weeds have increased, clarity fluctuatesI agree to the 945' activation level, a higher level would begin to go over my shoreline into the yard@ the point. Damage from wakes would definitely increase.They meet the objective of protecting shoreline. I wouldn't recommend lowering it either since it would trigger more distracting from lake use.I think the focus needs to remain on protecting shoreline and not increasing level to reduce events.10/9/2025 yesall of the above! We pontoon, surf, paddleboard & kayak & fish & swim. We have 3 boys and love lake life! 2025 was a poorer water quality than previous years.I think it should remain at current levels--we've had unfortunate timing of slow-no wake the last two summers, but we have to balance the desire to keep beaches/shoreline in It is necessary to balance. I think exceptions could be made for July 4th water ski show & when water falls below the limit- no need to wait 3 day to resume normal lake activities.10/5/2025 16:35 yes boating, fishing, kayaking, waterski, wake board ok mo should be raised to 945.910/13/2025 15:43 yes fishing, skiing, paddle boarding, sea doo mediumnot at right level. too conservative. The larger concern isnt the level. Rather the impact of erosion from wake setter boats. Watch you tube (DNR) videos as to the destruction of raise restriction. Remove Wake Setter Boats at public boat launches. Reduce hours wake setters (homeowners on lake) can be used. they are destroying the wildlife in the lake. I hope Chan is progressive in conservation efforts and putting energies where it is most impactful. We live on lake and cannot enjoy the same activities due to the large wakes created10/13/2025 15:08 yes Everything but surf boarding goodThe highest point in 2025 spring/summer was the peek not needed. Any higher it is needed. So anytime higher than good when needed. NOt that im an expert but I may have one of the the lowest back yard on the lakeonly wake problem causers at levels 6 inches higher than 2025 peak levels are surfing boards with boats. Their goal is ocean waves. 6 10/13/2025 14:13 yespaddle board, swimming, boating, fishing, kayaking, waterskiing, tubing, wake surfing Good, but the zebra muscles are annoying No. I feel it is too low. I would like to see it raised to 945.9Our kids love to water ski and tube and the no wake has disrupted their activities on the water the last two summers. Thank you for your consideration!10/12/2025 20:00 yes Surfing, Stand Up Paddle Boarding, Kayaking, floatingSometimes good - sometimes murky - depends on the time of the seasonAs a homeowner/property - we believe it is acceptable and do not believe it should be raised higher.We are fine with the current slow-no-wake for residents, but that visitors need better awareness.10/12/2025 15:07 yes All the above Great No. It is way to low I think that if the limit is set to a reasonable level it is a good thing. 10/11/2025 9:31 All of the above Excellent It's too low. The limit should be 945.9.It's essentially a summer fun ban on Lake Minnewashta. Please raise the limit to 945.9!It's important to work closely with the Carver County Sheriff regarding any regulations to ensure that they are enforceable.10/10/2025 10:42 yes Boating, fishing, waterskiing One of the best in the seven county metro areaNo, please put it back to 945.9. If we become known as non-recreational lake this may affect property values which in turn can decrease tax revenue for the cityThey were put in place without transparency, without homeowner or other user input. It was put forward by people who have been anti-wake and anti-recreational use of lakeOne of the primary drivers of wake restriction purchased a home which was known to be under the 250 year flood plain,, broad policy is being made to accommodate the concerns of few10/9/2025 16:40 yes Kayak, paddle boarding, boating Ok No, it is too low No wake should only be in effect once over flood stage - levelWe have lived on Lake Minnewashta for over 20 years and find that most boats are respectful of the shoreline and keep distance 10/9/2025 9:16 yes boating, kayaking, waterskiing, wake boarding, wake surfing excellentNO. Raise the level back to 945.9. Not sure why it was changed!Lakes go up and down based on weather. If you live on a lake you take the risk of low and high-water levels. NO restrictions is my vote. Somebody is having swimming events on the lake without a permit. Also, anybody that lives on the lake and is on the city council should not 10/7/2025 10:48 yes Boating, kayaking, waterskiing, wake-boating GoodNo- it is not being enforced at the correct level. With known periods of high rain fall it needs to be adjusted for when it’s I am not opposed to restrictions, however it is not set at the right threshold. If waves are flowing into peoples yards that is a problem The threshold needs to be set at a backed up level not an average of 5 years… we’ve never had so many no wakes before and it’s a very active 10/6/2025 19:38 yes Kayaking, wake-boating, pontoon cruising, swimming GoodNo - the current no-wake level will cancel 75% of our 4th of July weeks. The June rains will always have water level peak June 30 based on the normal June rain cycle. They it always Raise it to a reasonable level. There was no sign of shore erosion at the current no-wake level. We should be proud of our amazing lake property not micro manage it. Many family reunions are July 4.There are normal cycles to the ice in winter and the rain in summer. The ice shift this year caused more damage than any high water years. It is the cost of owning a home on the lake to manage. 10/6/2025 16:43 Boating, wake surfing, paddle boarding Very good I feel it is two low I think they are an important aspect of lake protection.I believe the methodology should be consistent across Chanhassen lakes and set at the 100 year FEMA level, for Lake Minnewashta that is 10/6/2025 9:56 yes Fishing, wakesurfing, wakeboarding GreatIt is too low, and too restrictive. The prime periods of the season are disrupted every year now, for Minnewashta and They make sense in moderation and should be aligned with other lakes as well as with our new normal. Under the new normal, the We have a lot of shoreline. We understand the challenges. That said, we live here to be able to use the lake, and currently we are not able to as 10/6/2025 9:39 yes boating, fishing, kayaking good seems a bit low There has been lots of days with slow no wake July 4th weekend is timeframe that it is most upsetting10/6/2025 9:33 yes boating, fishing, kayaking, and wake-boating Good, clear but weeds are a problemThe limit should be raised to 945.9 feet. There is no negative effect on lake shore property owners (I am one). It's overly restrictive and limits use during peek season No necessary. The change to the lake level threshold a few years ago has lead to this lake being unused during the height of summer. The usage of this lake is very limited for 3/4 of the year. 10/6/2025 8:40 baoting, SUP, canoe Fair No I support raising the elevation to 945.9I do not feel they are necessary. I live on lake Minnewashta. It feels very much like a solution looking for a problem. 10/6/2025 7:36 yes Boating, fishing, kayaking, wake surfing Good No- it is too restrictive When appropriate, they are a positive. However, current restrictions are unreasonable and have significantly impacted summer 10/6/2025 5:42 yes Everything lake relatedGreat in the Spring and degrades with wake setter damage during the summer (churning up bottom) and with warmer waters, as well as lawn fertilizer use around the lake Too low and has resulted in unnecessary restrictions during key lake use and important family traditions/holidays.Not a fan of them, except within Little Minni where the boat launch is located.Minnewashta regional park had an initial restriction on size of motors and number of boats ... not sure how that requirement changed and I'd like to see those restrictions come back. 10/6/2025 5:41 yes I gosh, jetski, Waterski and pontoon. Great No, it is not at the right level. Raise the level and keep the slow no wake if it hits a higher level. Kick wake boats off the lake. Ski boats and pontoons are not the problem. Minnewashta is too small to have 25-30 wake boats going. 10/5/2025 21:27 Fishing, Kayaking, Waterskiing, Wake-boating, Swimming.The water quality of Lake Minnewashta is great, there are no issues with the quality.They are unneccesarily too low. It is not at the right level and needs to be raised at least 6 inches to accommodate reasonable use throughout the summer months.The past few years they have made an unnecessary impact on the community from general enjoyment of the lake to the loss of the waterski show on the 4th of July. The restrictions need to be 10/5/2025 20:31 yes boating, fishing, kayaking, waterskiing, swimming Good, too many weeds No, it is too low. Too many restrictions for little reasons Necessary when avoiding serious property damage10/5/2025 20:07 Boating surfing, jet skiing, paddle boarding Excellent Too low. It should be at the 945.9 ft level They are too restrictive the last couple of years. No10/5/2025 19:34 yes boating, skiing, fishing, SUPing, waterskiing, wake surfing good no, it is too low the depth needs to be increased. two years in a row we haven't been 10/5/2025 19:00 yes Waterskiing Great!No, would like it increased. I have lived on the lake since 1970 and it is clear to me that the water level abs and flows and we must consider new levels.With climate change and weather patterns changing, as a Lakeshore owner and water Skier I think we need to raise the levels so we can all enjoy the lake!!In the past when we’’ve had no wake zone, I see so many drop in voters ignoring the restriction. As a taxpayer and Lakeshore owner, this is very frustrating, so we need to set a new level. 10/5/2025 18:30 Boating, kayaking, paddle boarding Nice, clean No. It should be raised. They are too restrictive. They close down the lake during peak 10/5/2025 18:24 Boating waterskiing fishing Good No. It needs to be raised too restrictive 10/5/2025 17:49 yes boating, fishing, kayaking, waterskiing, wake-boating decent slow/no-wake threshold should be raised to 945.9 feetrestrictions should be be limited to flood levels. excessive regulations limit usefulness of resources and ultimately property 292 10/5/2025 17:41 yes Boating, tubing, wake boating Wonderfully clean water no, it’s too low. Threshold should be higher similar to other lakes in the area.They are necessary one at an inappropriate level to preserve ShorelinePlease consider raising the limit so residence can enjoy for recreational use similar to other lakes well so preserving the shoreline10/5/2025 17:29 yesBoat, jet ski, kayak, canoe, paddle board, water ski, tubing, swimming, fishing Medium. Lots of weeds. Zebra mussel proliferation. I would like to see it slightly higher, so there is less no-wake mid summer. I appreciate having a water level based no wake. I do NOT want a boat-type based restriction, such as distance from shore for wake I appreciate having a water level based no wake. I do NOT want a boat-type based restriction, such as distance from shore for wake boats. 10/5/2025 17:14 Boating Excellent No, threshold is too restrictive Lake Minnewashta doesn't seem busy enough to warrant no wake 10/5/2025 16:55 yes Boating, kayaking, SUP, wake surf & wake board GoodIt needs to be raised. I want the slow/no-wake threshold raised to 945.9 feet (Lake Minnewashta’s base flood level) They are FAR too restrictive.Please raise the level and allow residents to enjoy their lake access again. 10/5/2025 16:36 yes boating, average No, the past two years we have had a lot of rain in the spring and being of summer, And other years the lake has been low beginning of the summer. I feel it should be lower than 945.0it seems the people that have cut their shorelines down are the ones that are complaining.99% of the people that use the lake are considerate and wakeboarders and surfers are out in the middle of the lake and it make minimal in pack on the shoreline.10/5/2025 15:55 Boating surfing fishing wakeboarding jet skiing Good We need to raise the limit We need to raise the limit We chose to live on this lake for the ability to serve. No wake zone is causing people to not want to live around this lake.10/5/2025 15:37 yes Waterskiing Good Current restrictions are too strict10/5/2025 14:22 yes boating, fishing, wake boating, paddle boarding, tubingWe do not have any complaints regarding the quality of the water. The no wake elevation is set too high and I would suggest to raise the threshold to 945.9 feet - Lake Minnewashta's base The no-wake restriction has made the lake unusable for recreation, taking away the core family activities—boating, tubing, 10/5/2025 14:01 yes Fishing, boating, skiing, surfing Good It is too low, it seems we have an extended period of no wake They are unnecessary until very extreme circumstances Please raise the no wake level threshold 10/5/2025 13:57 yesBoating, fishing, kayaking, wake-surfing, wakeboarding, swimming, paddleboarding GoodNo. It is too low and has often inhibited recreation. I am extremely frustrated with it. I disagree with them unless scenarios are extreme (which I have never seen).Please raise Minnewashta's slow-no-wake limit. The 945.9 feet limit (Lake Minnewashta’s base flood level) is sufficient.10/5/2025 13:44Boating fishing kayaking paddleboarding beach swimming ice fishing Very good (minus the zebra mussels)No. There needs to be a scientific standard set which should dictate policy. They are needed to help preserve shoreline in historically high water level events. 10/5/2025 13:31 yes Paddle boarding, kayaking, fishing, boating, swimming Average. Too low. Should be raised to 945.9 feet which is Male Minnewashta’s base flood level. People are focused on their own agenda rather that the community amenity. If your shoreline is eroding, you shouldn’t have cut back the Neighbors are arguing over their personal opinions. The lake is a community amenity- not personal property. 10/5/2025 13:31 yes Kayak, surfing, swimming, boat Decent Need to be higher Do not agree with it Raise the limit so we don’t need restrictions 10/5/2025 13:29 yes Boating, wake boarding, wake surfing GoodThe level is too low. We have been repeatedly impacted by this - friends/family come from out of town and we end up having to go to another lake. Ridiculous. There is a balance between allowing recreation and protecting property. We own 1400 feet of frontage; we know living here means we have to expend time and money to protect our shoreline. So be it.The rights of the few should not be allowed to so unreasonably trump the rights of the many. 10/5/2025 13:26 yes Waterskiing. Paddleboarding ExcellentNo! We’ve lived on the lake for 20 years. It was changed in 2020 with no warning/discussion with any homeowners. We’ve owned three different properties on the lake the only s-They’ve been implemented by a few select people recently who do not represent the majority of homeowners, this will lower our property value as people buy on this lake for recreation Please put it back to where it’s been at 945.910/5/2025 13:15 yes Boating, fishing, kayaking, water sports Great The level is to low, needs to be raised They are appropriate for high levels in general but the threshold now 10/5/2025 13:06 Boating, water sports, swimming Appears clean and healthy It is set at an unreasonable level.It’s unreasonable to have no wake zone the way it’s been enforced the last handful of years. Go away with the restriction Can any lakeshore owner show any lakeshore damage from recent years lake level being what they were and boat traffic?10/5/2025 12:53 yes Boating, fishing, wake surfing Good No. Too low. Should be raised to 945.9 feet. 10/5/2025 12:51 Pontooning, fishing, waterskiing, swimming, SUP/kayak. Above averageThey are overly restrictive in threshold and 3 days clearance without scientific or accurate historical data, more restrictive than surrounding lakes,, have led to frequent and significant They have a role when accurate. The current restrictions impact nearly everyone’s use and enjoyment of the lake, for which they pay a premium, with activity at very specific levels necessary but at current levels impacting a few. 10/5/2025 12:38 yesWe use the lake for fishing, swimming, paddle boarding, kayaking, boating, tubing and surfing Very goodI don’t think it’s at the appropriate level, since we moved into the lake there has been more days of slow no wake compared to other similar lakes in the area. The restrictions for slow no wake do need to exist to proctect the lake shore/environment in appropriate situations 10/5/2025 12:17 yesFishing, swimming, wake boating, kayaking, jet ski, paddle boatd Very goodThe current slow-no-wake level is too low. We’ve lived on the lake for a decade and we have winds blowing at us regularly that create more waves on our beach than boats do.When used at appropriate levels they are beneficial to the lake and people who enjoy using the lake.The level set at 945.9 would be appropriate. It’s a 100 year FEMA approved level that would protect the shoreline during actual flood conditions.10/5/2025 12:02 yes Boating, fishing, kayak, jet ski, water ski, surf, swim Good It’s too low They’re fine - use respect and courtesy of peoples shoreline, docks, 10/5/2025 12:00 yes Boating, water skiing, wake boating, kayaking, paddle boarding, Good No, it should be raised to 945.9 Fine if the water is too high but needs to be a realistic level (ours was No other lake’s stayed closed as long as ours and lake Minnetonka 10/4/2025 14:31 Kayaking I think it’s degraded I think the restriction should increase I support them 10/4/2025 13:31 Boating Decent except for the weeks and zebra muscles I would like it to be raisedI would like the whole lake level to be raised. There are time when I have to pull my boat because of low lake levels. I would like to hear other people’s comments as mine are from my perspective only. 10/3/2025 17:44 yesBoating, Fishing, Paddle boarding, swimming, wake surfing, jet ski, tubing Excellent. Which is why we bought a property on the lake.It is set too low, we have had over 6 times the amount vs surrounding lakes in Chanhassen in the last 2 years They are an important part of environmental stewardship Set the level at the 100 year FEMA LEVEL OF 945.9 feet so the shoreline is protected during flooding conditions and lake users are not limited in 10/1/2025 21:40 boating, swimming, kayaking Fair. The weeds can be bad.No, it is not the right level. It should be higher. The past few years we have had no wake restrictions, while the water level We need them, but they need to be relaxed. When there is a problem, it also seems too long to lift the restriction.Restricting skiing and surfing areas might be helpful to save the shorelines.10/1/2025 19:07Boating, water-skiing, tubing, wake boarding, but we do not have a wake surf boat GreatIt should be tiered based on type of wake. Wake surf boats using ballast should have a lower slow-no-wake restriction. The elevation level should be raised for most but lowered for Valid to protect property and shorelineIt's very hard to find out if the lake has a restriction. We packed up all our boating stuff drove all the way to the lake, only to have the DNR guy tell us. The info isn't posted anywhere.10/1/2025 17:32 yes Boating fishing surfing paddle boarding Fair could have better weed control No I feel it should be higher It limits a lotboat users it’s a public lake and people should be able 10/1/2025 17:17 yes Pontooning. fishing, kayaking, jetskiing OK. Level needs to be higher. Appears to be no scientific evidence behind 945.0. Restrictions should be no wake after 3 consecutive days above level & continue until 1 day below level.Need push notification to notify about no wake when on & off. Also need a link on City website where we can view the daily levels being 10/1/2025 14:18 yesWake surfing, pontoon boating, paddle boarding, swimming, kayaking Good, but too many weedsI think it needs to be raised. It’s too restrictive. I believe there is a proposal to raise to 945.9. I would support that number. I think all boaters should exercise polite and safe boating activities. I would prefer that there were no restrictions at all, but I understand I support the 100 year FEMA level at 945.9. To protect shoreline and allow for reasonable enjoyment for boaters. 10/1/2025 13:21 yesKayaking, paddle boarding, waterskiing, wake surfing, sunset cruising, swimming, fishing, etc. Very good It is set too low. We are running into restrictions every year yet the weather pattern is the same. Meaning it is the norm not They are important. We have reviewed the data and believe the level is set too low. The level should be set to the 100 year FEMA flood level to protect the lake during 10/1/2025 13:08 Recreational watersports, fishing, kayaking, waterski show Water clarity is good and phosphorus is lowNo, the level is set too low. It should match Lake Minnewashta's base flood elevation of 945.9.No-wake restrictions are essentially recreational watersports bans when set below flood levels.Raise the limit to 945.9. If you want to improve water quality, there are far more effective approaches than banning recreational watersports.10/1/2025 13:02 All except wake boating. GoodNo. The level is to low as we have had more no wake restrictions than other lakes around us. They are fine if managed appropriately Raise the limit to the fema documented limit293 10/1/2025 12:58 yesBoating, fishing, swimming, kayaking, skiing, winter activities, wakeboarding Very goodNo. Should be raised to 945.9. The science behind the current limit is minimal. Restrictions on distance from shore should not be in place. Restrictions on water level should be in place but should be raised ln 10/1/2025 10:38 yes Boating, wake boating, waterskiing, fishing Good, would appreciate more weed control No, it should be higher or be removedThis year has shown a dramatic improvement in large boater behavior, with users consistantly using the center of the lake and avoiding high waves on shore. Post a sign at the boat launch to Boaters want to do the right thing, they just need to be informed.10/1/2025 9:57 yesBoating, fishing, paddle boarding, swimming, waterskiing, wake surfing, tubing, boating ExcellentIt is set too low. We have too many slow/no wake days compared to other Chanhassen lakes They are an important element of environmental stewardship Set the level at the 100 year FEMA level of 945.9 feet so the shoreline is protected during flood conditions, and lake users are not limited in their 10/1/2025 9:49 yes Boating, kayaking, waterskiing, wake-boating, sup excellent no. It’s too low. It’s okay when there is risk of actual flooding. That does not occur at the 945 level. We have kived on the lake for over 50 years and 945 is Boaters on Lake Minnewashta are extremely well behaved. Additional restrictions are not needed and no wake trigger levels should be raised 10/9/2025 yes Boating, fishing, kayaking, waterskiing & paddle boardinggenerally good/clean, weedy problem areas, zebra mussels, worry about erosion on point only Would like to see it raised to 945.9 Necessary in places to preserve lakeshoreWould be interested in seeing if there are any outflow opportunities in the north bay10/9/2025 yes Kayaking, paddle board, swim, surf okwould like to see fewer restriction days. Remove 3 days. Raise by an inch or two Sadly take a lot of great family boat days10/9/2025 yes Remove restriction or at least raise to 945.9 Read full Letter sent10/9/2025 yesSwimming, canoeing, kayaking,paddleboarding, boating, tubing & waterskiing-hiking & icefishing in winterour greater family concern for lake health lies in weed overgrowth and continued spread of invasive zebra revisit and medestly increase the current no-wake water level threshold Read full Letter sent 294 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item Third Quarter 2025 Economic Development Activity Report File No.Item No: J.1 Agenda Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Prepared By Sam DiMaggio, Economic Development Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY Staff has compiled the Third Quarter Report, providing a summary of the Economic Development Department’s activities and business-related insights. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION 295 ATTACHMENTS Third Quarter Report 296 2025 Economic Development Activity 3rd Quarter 1 SUMMARY OF FORMAL AND INFORMAL BUSINESS VISITS Q1 Staff has been working with local property owners and developers on the potential growth and expansion of their properties within the City of Chanhassen, helping them maximize the use of their land and buildings. In addition, a growing number of developers have reached out to staff seeking available properties or assistance with sites they already own locally. Recently, staff sent introductory letters to 29 Chanhassen businesses and their corresponding property owners—those with either Chaska or Excelsior mailing addresses—to inform them of the new Local Option Sales Tax that took effect on April 1, 2025. Since this may have been the first point of contact with the city for some recipients, the letters also introduced key departments and resources available to support them. Additionally, staff supported the Engineering Department with business outreach to 50 local businesses in connection with the Market Boulevard project and the outreach meeting held on February 14, 2025. Q2 The businesses visited this quarter consistently expressed a desire to strengthen their visibility and reputation within the community. Many are interested in marketing themselves both to residents and to other businesses, aiming to demonstrate their value as contributors to the local economy and as engaged community partners. They want to be known not only for the products or services they provide, but also for their role in supporting a thriving and connected community. Employers also emphasized the importance of being recognized as “employers of choice.” They want to attract and retain a talented workforce by creating positive work environments, offering competitive opportunities, and maintaining a strong presence in the marketplace. A common theme that emerged was the need for affordable housing options for employees. Business leaders recognize that accessible housing is directly tied to workforce stability, recruitment, and retention, and they see it as a critical factor in sustaining both their business es and the overall economic vitality of Chanhassen. Q3 Staff engaged with several developers who are actively exploring ways to maximize the use of their parcels in alignment with existing Planned Unit Development (PUD) or zoning regulations, while also contributing to the vitality of the city’s commercial districts. We also met with apartment developers to review proposed projects, ensuring compliance with zoning, building, and fire codes, responsiveness to current market conditions, and financial feasibility within their budgets. During these conversations, staff shared potential funding opportunities that could support project implementation. Additionally, developers with Industrial Office Park (IOP) designated parcels expressed concerns about the ongoing lack of demand for light industrial or office space end users. Others with surplus land are considering expansions or repurposing strategies, and many have requested greater flexibility in permitted uses as they evaluate alternative development options. 297 2025 Economic Development Activity 3rd Quarter 2 NEW CHANHASSEN BUSINESSES Cheesecake Funk (2419 MN-7) Drive Coffee Roasters (2915 Water Tower Pl) Hope Breakfast Bar (464 Lake Drive, Suite 100) Jump Start Adventure Park (18812 Lake Dr E) Lean Kitchen CO. (7860 Century Blvd) OG Coffee & Wine Bar (600 Market Street, Suite 110) Pro Nail & Lounge (464 Lake Drive, Suite 110) Xfinity Store by Comcast (464 Lake Drive, Suite 130) BUSINESS VISITS Q1 Dandy Lion Coffee, Hansen Hometech, Kraus Anderson, and Phillips Edison & Company. Q2 Holiday Inn Express & Suites Chanhassen by IHG, Hope House, and IWCO. Q3 Buhl Investors, Jump Start Adventure Park, Xcel Energy, and Xfinity/Comcast. Business Featured in the Local Video Series Q1 The OG Coffee and Wine Bar (Julie Jost) Q2 Federal Package (Melissa Niebes), Na’s Thia Café (Na Monthisane & Christina Kirksey), and Golf Zone (Brian Colvin). Q3 Lakewinds (Renee Winslet), and Campfire MN (Kori Redepenning) SAC PROGRAM BUSINESS UTILIZATION Business Type of Business Total Assessed City Credits Value of Waiver Q1 Driven Coffee Roasters (2915 Water Tower Pl) Light Manufacturing 1 1 $12,080 Q2 Lil Metros Daycare (7580 Quattro Drive) Employee Daycare 1 1 $12,080 Q3 Liora Nails & Spa (500 W. 79th Street, Suite 100) Nail Salon 1 1 $12,080 298 2025 Economic Development Activity 3rd Quarter 3 REQUESTED ASSISTANCE (via email or in-person meeting) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL YTD Business Planning 0 2 0 2 eCommerce 1 0 0 1 Funding (Grants, TIF, etc.) 0 4 0 4 Human Resources 0 2 0 2 Marketing and Sales 3 13 7 23 Market Research 1 0 3 4 Mentoring 1 0 3 4 Non-Profit Issues 0 4 0 4 Property Development 43 65 21 129 Regulatory Compliance 0 4 0 4 Site Location 24 21 9 54 Start-up Assistance 7 3 7 17 Strategic Planning 0 6 0 6 Tax Planning 0 0 1 1 TOTAL 89 124 48 261 MEETING TYPE Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOTAL YTD Businesses 2 3 5 10 Non-Profits & Government 1 1 3 5 Entrepreneurs 1 2 2 5 Brokers/Developers 5 6 3 14 TOTAL INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS 9 12 13 34 299 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item Third Quarter 2025 Communications Update File No.Item No: J.2 Agenda Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Prepared By Patrick Gavin, Communications Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Communications SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Communications Third Quarter Update 300 Chanhassen Communications: Impact Insights Q3 2025 301 Email Newsletters -Total Subscribers: 16,523 (+2.7%from this month, previous year) -Most popular email lists: •"Message from the Mayor" (11,848 subscribers,-3.1%from this month previous year) •"Park and Recreation Programs"(7,015 subscribers,–8%from this month previous year) •Chan-Happenings (6,350 subscribers,+4.2%from this month previous year) -Number of newsletters sent during the quarter: 119 (unchanged from previous quarter). 2 302 Email Newsletters -Top Five Open Rates (% of emails opened): “Proposed Development Projects” (61%) (August 18) "Proposed Development Projects (60%) (September 16) “Proposed Development Projects” (60%) (August 7) "Proposed Development Projects" (56%) (July 24) "Proposed Developments" (54%) (August 18) 3 303 Social Media Q3 2025: Q3 2024: 4 304 Social Media Subscriber Change (compared to previous qtr): Facebook: +279 new followers Instagram: +291new followers Twitter/X: +6 new followers LinkedIn: +43 new followers 5 305 Social Media Top Facebook Performers: 6 306 Social Media Top Facebook Reels Performers: 7 Fire Department Open House Promotional Video: 20,503 views, 170 interactions E-Bike Educational Video:11,128 views, 91 interactions Market Blvd reopen to traffic.8988 views, 66 interactions 307 Social Media Top Instagram Performers: 8 308 Social Media Top Twitter/X Performers: 9 309 Social Media Top YouTube Performers: 10 310 ChanhassenMN.gov Total Active Visitors: 52,460 (-27.16% from Q3 2024) Total Views:172,397(-16.88 from Q3 2024) Total Sessions: 101,329 (-15.75 from Q3 2024) 11 “Active Visitors”: The total number of people who visited our website. Each person is counted once, no matter how many times they visit. “Sessions”: The total visits to our website. Each time someone comes to the site, it starts a new session, even if they’re a returning visitor. “Page Views”: The total number of pages viewed. Every time a page loads, it counts as one view, including repeat views of the same page. 311 ChanhassenMN.gov 12 Top 10 Most Visited Pages 312 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item Discuss Acquisition of PID 25.8680100, a tax-forfeited parcel File No.N/A Item No: K.1 Agenda Section CLOSED SESSION Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION Item #1 Motion to enter a closed session that will involve discussion of bid strategy related to tax-forfeited parcel PID 25.8680100, for which the City is eligible to submit a sealed bid. Item #2 Authorize staff to submit a sealed bid to Carver County for the purchase of tax-forfeited property (PID 25.8680100) adjacent to City-owned land, and approve use of Sewer Utility Fund dollars for the bid and associated closing costs. Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY Carver County notified the City that tax-forfeited parcel PID 25.8680100 is being offered for sale through a private sealed-bid process restricted to adjoining landowners. This approach is required under recent changes to state tax-forfeiture statutes, which no longer allow counties to designate forfeited parcels for conveyance directly to governmental entities prior to public sale. 313 Per the County’s notice: Local governments are no longer automatically eligible to acquire forfeited parcels prior to attempted sale. Counties must attempt sale of qualifying tax-forfeited parcels annually through 2029. The current sale format is a private sealed bid limited to adjoining property owners. Bids are due to Carver County by 9:00 a.m. on November 17, 2025. Because the City owns land directly adjacent to PID 25.8680100, we qualify as an eligible bidder this year. Future eligibility may depend on statutory cycles and ownership status at the time of future offerings. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §13D.05, subd. 3(c), the City Council may meet in closed session to develop or consider offers or counteroffers for the purchase of real property when public discussion would harm the City’s bargaining position. BACKGROUND Parcel 25.8680100 contains multiple existing public improvements, including: City owned sanitary sewer lines and manholes City owned paved multi-use trail MCES sewer interceptor and manhole These facilities represent essential public infrastructure already serving the community. Acquisition of the property would: Protect and secure existing sewer assets and trail facilities Ensure continued access for inspection and maintenance Avoid future conflicts if a third party acquires the parcel Provide flexibility for long-term utility and trail planning DISCUSSION 314 N/A BUDGET The bid amount will be submitted through the private sealed process. Final cost will depend on bid competitiveness. Staff anticipates the cost will be consistent with similar tax-forfeited land valuations. Funding is recommended from the Sewer Utility Fund given the presence of sanitary infrastructure. RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Resolution Parcel Location - 258680100 Parcel Location - 258680100 no aerial 315 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE:____November 10, 2025_________ RESOLUTION NO: ___2025-XX____________ MOTION BY:____________________ SECONDED BY:__________________________ A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF A SEALED BID FOR TAX- FORFEITED PROPERTY (PID 25.8680100) AND APPROVING BID AUTHORITY WHEREAS, Carver County has notified the City of Chanhassen that tax-forfeited parcel PID 25.8680100 is being offered for sale through a private sealed-bid process limited to adjoining landowners pursuant to applicable state statute; and WHEREAS, recent changes to Minnesota statutes require counties to attempt annual sale of eligible tax-forfeited property through 2029, and no longer permit direct conveyance of certain forfeited parcels to governmental agencies prior to attempted sale; and WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen is an adjoining landowner to parcel PID 25.8680100 and therefore eligible to submit a sealed bid during the 2025 offering; and WHEREAS, the subject parcel contains existing City sanitary sewer infrastructure, an established public trail corridor, and the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) interceptor line, making the parcel critical for continued utility access, maintenance, and public use; and WHEREAS, acquisition of the parcel will protect existing public infrastructure, secure long-term trail access, and preserve future operational and planning flexibility; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a closed session pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 13D.05, subd. 3(c), to develop and review confidential bidding strategy for acquisition of the property, and such strategy requires confidentiality to protect the public interest and the City’s negotiating position; and WHEREAS, the sealed bid must be submitted to Carver County by 9:00 a.m. on November 17, 2025, and authorization is required to allow staff to timely act. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council that staff are hereby authorized and directed to submit a sealed bid to Carver County for acquisition of parcel PID 25.8680100; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council authorizes a maximum bid amount as discussed in closed session, and authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute and submit necessary forms and payment instruments consistent with that direction; and 316 2 BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, funding for the acquisition is approved from the Sewer Utility Fund, with the option for Parks and Recreation Fund cost-share to reflect trail interests, and the City Manager is authorized to complete all necessary steps to effectuate the purchase if the City is the successful bidder. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 10th day of November, 2025. ATTEST: ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 317 258680100 Lake Susan Missio n Hills D r Marsh D r M a in S tD a k o t a Ln MayfieldCtMission Hills Ct P o n d P r om e n a d e W 8 6th St MissionHillsLnSinn e n C irL a k e D r T i g u a L nMissionHillsCirGrandviewRdWaters Edge DrLake Susan Park Rice Marsh Lake Preserve GreatPlainsBlvdMa r k e t B lv d ST101 Document Path: K:\Departments\Admin\Parcel Location'\Parcel Location'.aprxDate Created: 11/3/2025 Created By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department µ0 0.06 Mile 0 300 Feet PID 258680100 City of Chanhassen 318 258680100 Lake Susan Missio n Hills D r Marsh D r M a in S tD a k o t a Ln MayfieldCtMission Hills Ct P o n d P r om e n a d e W 8 6th St MissionHillsLnSinn e n C irL a k e D r T i g u a L nMissionHillsCirGrandviewRdWaters Edge DrLake Susan Park Rice Marsh Lake Preserve GreatPlainsBlvdMa r k e t B lv d ST101 Document Path: K:\Departments\Admin\Parcel Location'\Parcel Location'.aprxDate Created: 11/3/2025 Created By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department µ0 0.06 Mile 0 300 Feet PID 258680100 City of Chanhassen 319 City Council Item November 10, 2025 Item Discuss Acquisition of PID 25.8680100, a tax-forfeited parcel File No.N/A Item No: L.1 Agenda Section GENERAL BUSINESS Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION Item #1 Motion to enter a closed session that will involve discussion of bid strategy related to tax-forfeited parcel PID 25.8680100, for which the City is eligible to submit a sealed bid. Item #2 Authorize staff to submit a sealed bid to Carver County for the purchase of tax-forfeited property (PID 25.8680100) adjacent to City-owned land, and approve use of Sewer Utility Fund dollars for the bid and associated closing costs. Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY Carver County notified the City that tax-forfeited parcel PID 25.8680100 is being offered for sale through a private sealed-bid process restricted to adjoining landowners. This approach is required under recent changes to state tax-forfeiture statutes, which no longer allow counties to designate forfeited parcels for conveyance directly to governmental entities prior to public sale. 320 Per the County’s notice: Local governments are no longer automatically eligible to acquire forfeited parcels prior to attempted sale. Counties must attempt sale of qualifying tax-forfeited parcels annually through 2029. The current sale format is a private sealed bid limited to adjoining property owners. Bids are due to Carver County by 9:00 a.m. on November 17, 2025. Because the City owns land directly adjacent to PID 25.8680100, we qualify as an eligible bidder this year. Future eligibility may depend on statutory cycles and ownership status at the time of future offerings. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §13D.05, subd. 3(c), the City Council may meet in closed session to develop or consider offers or counteroffers for the purchase of real property when public discussion would harm the City’s bargaining position. BACKGROUND Parcel 25.8680100 contains multiple existing public improvements, including: City owned sanitary sewer lines and manholes City owned paved multi-use trail MCES sewer interceptor and manhole These facilities represent essential public infrastructure already serving the community. Acquisition of the property would: Protect and secure existing sewer assets and trail facilities Ensure continued access for inspection and maintenance Avoid future conflicts if a third party acquires the parcel Provide flexibility for long-term utility and trail planning DISCUSSION 321 N/A BUDGET The bid amount will be submitted through the private sealed process. Final cost will depend on bid competitiveness. Staff anticipates the cost will be consistent with similar tax-forfeited land valuations. Funding is recommended from the Sewer Utility Fund given the presence of sanitary infrastructure. RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Resolution Parcel Location - 258680100 Parcel Location - 258680100 no aerial 322 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE:____November 10, 2025_________ RESOLUTION NO: ___2025-XX____________ MOTION BY:____________________ SECONDED BY:__________________________ A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF A SEALED BID FOR TAX- FORFEITED PROPERTY (PID 25.8680100) AND APPROVING BID AUTHORITY WHEREAS, Carver County has notified the City of Chanhassen that tax-forfeited parcel PID 25.8680100 is being offered for sale through a private sealed-bid process limited to adjoining landowners pursuant to applicable state statute; and WHEREAS, recent changes to Minnesota statutes require counties to attempt annual sale of eligible tax-forfeited property through 2029, and no longer permit direct conveyance of certain forfeited parcels to governmental agencies prior to attempted sale; and WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen is an adjoining landowner to parcel PID 25.8680100 and therefore eligible to submit a sealed bid during the 2025 offering; and WHEREAS, the subject parcel contains existing City sanitary sewer infrastructure, an established public trail corridor, and the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) interceptor line, making the parcel critical for continued utility access, maintenance, and public use; and WHEREAS, acquisition of the parcel will protect existing public infrastructure, secure long-term trail access, and preserve future operational and planning flexibility; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a closed session pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 13D.05, subd. 3(c), to develop and review confidential bidding strategy for acquisition of the property, and such strategy requires confidentiality to protect the public interest and the City’s negotiating position; and WHEREAS, the sealed bid must be submitted to Carver County by 9:00 a.m. on November 17, 2025, and authorization is required to allow staff to timely act. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council that staff are hereby authorized and directed to submit a sealed bid to Carver County for acquisition of parcel PID 25.8680100; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council authorizes a maximum bid amount as discussed in closed session, and authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute and submit necessary forms and payment instruments consistent with that direction; and 323 2 BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, funding for the acquisition is approved from the Sewer Utility Fund, with the option for Parks and Recreation Fund cost-share to reflect trail interests, and the City Manager is authorized to complete all necessary steps to effectuate the purchase if the City is the successful bidder. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 10th day of November, 2025. ATTEST: ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 324 258680100 Lake Susan Missio n Hills D r Marsh D r M a in S tD a k o t a Ln MayfieldCtMission Hills Ct P o n d P r om e n a d e W 8 6th St MissionHillsLnSinn e n C irL a k e D r T i g u a L nMissionHillsCirGrandviewRdWaters Edge DrLake Susan Park Rice Marsh Lake Preserve GreatPlainsBlvdMa r k e t B lv d ST101 Document Path: K:\Departments\Admin\Parcel Location'\Parcel Location'.aprxDate Created: 11/3/2025 Created By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department µ0 0.06 Mile 0 300 Feet PID 258680100 City of Chanhassen 325 258680100 Lake Susan Missio n Hills D r Marsh D r M a in S tD a k o t a Ln MayfieldCtMission Hills Ct P o n d P r om e n a d e W 8 6th St MissionHillsLnSinn e n C irL a k e D r T i g u a L nMissionHillsCirGrandviewRdWaters Edge DrLake Susan Park Rice Marsh Lake Preserve GreatPlainsBlvdMa r k e t B lv d ST101 Document Path: K:\Departments\Admin\Parcel Location'\Parcel Location'.aprxDate Created: 11/3/2025 Created By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department µ0 0.06 Mile 0 300 Feet PID 258680100 City of Chanhassen 326