11-10-2025 City Council Agenda and PacketA.5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION
Note: Unless otherwise noted, work sessions are held in the Training Room in the lower level of
City Hall and are open to the public. If the City Council does not complete the work session items
in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda. Public
comment is not allowed at the work session.
A.1 2026 Utility Fund Budgets, 2026 Utility Rates, and 2026-2030 Utility Fund CIP
A.2 Pleasant View Road Improvement Project
A.3 Sign Code Discussion
A.4 Future Work Session Schedule
B.7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance)
C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS
D.CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will
be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is
desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. City
council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to the council packet for
each staff report.
D.1 Approve City Council Meeting Minutes dated October 27, 2025
D.2 Approve City Council Work Session Minutes dated October 27, 2025.
D.3 Receive Park and Recreation Commission Minutes dated August 26, 2025
D.4 Receive Commission on Aging Minutes dated August 15, 2025
D.5 Receive Commission on Aging Minutes dated September 19, 2025
AGENDA
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2025
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD
1
D.6 Approve Claims Paid dated November 10, 2025
D.7 2025 Well Rehabilitation Project
D.8 Approve Permanent Stormwater Ownership and Maintenance Agreement for Avienda
Apartments
D.9 Dogwood Right-of-Way Vacation
D.10 Partial Release of Planned Unit Development Agreement (951 W 78th Street)
D.11 Approve SCALE Hardware and Software Purchase with Computer Integrated Technologies
(CIT)
D.12 Resolution 2025-XX: Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County for the Mill Street Trail
Improvement Project
D.13 Resolution 2025-XX: Call Public Improvement Hearing for the 2026 City Pavement
Rehabilitation Project No. 26-01
E.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and
submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda).
F.FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE
G.PUBLIC HEARINGS
G.1 Resolution 2025-XX: Accept Feasibility Study, Conduct Public Improvement Hearing, and
Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the 2026 Great Plains Blvd/Lake Dr
East Rehabilitation Project No. 26-02
G.2 Lake Minnewashta Slow No Wake Public Hearing
H.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
I.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
J.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION
J.1 Third Quarter 2025 Economic Development Activity Report
J.2 Third Quarter 2025 Communications Update
K.CLOSED SESSION
K.1 Discuss Acquisition of PID 25.8680100, a tax-forfeited parcel
L.GENERAL BUSINESS
L.1 Discuss Acquisition of PID 25.8680100, a tax-forfeited parcel
2
M.ADJOURNMENT
GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the
Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council.
That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations.
Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is
required to complete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available at
https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers
prior to the meeting.
A total of thirty minutes is alloted for Visitor Presentations. Priority is given to Chanhassen
residents. An additional thirty minutes may be provided after General Business items are
complete at the discretion of the City Council.
Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the
Mayor. When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be
addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is
not a member of the City Council.
If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a
spokesperson that can summarize the issue.
Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the
Mayor. If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. Comments may also be
emailed to the City Council at council@chanhassenmn.gov.
During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in
discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a
thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request.
Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an
individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be
directed to the City Manager.
Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Tequila Butcher, 590 West
79th Street in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the
public are welcome.
3
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item 2026 Utility Fund Budgets, 2026 Utility Rates, and 2026-2030 Utility Fund CIP
File No.Item No: A.1
Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION
Prepared By Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
N/A
Motion Type N/A
Strategic
Priority Financial Sustainability
SUMMARY
Staff will review the 2026 Water, Sewer, and Storm Water Fund budgets, proposed utility fund rates for
2026, and the 2026-2030 Utility Fund Capital Improvement Plan.
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
4
ATTACHMENTS
5
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item Pleasant View Road Improvement Project
File No.ENG 26-03 Item No: A.2
Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION
Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen
SUGGESTED ACTION
N/A - Discussion only
Motion Type N/A
Strategic
Priority Asset Management
SUMMARY
Staff will give an update on the status of the Pleasant View Road Improvement Project
BACKGROUND
Pleasant View Road is currently being shown in our 5-yr CIP as a multi-year project starting in 2027.
The exact scope of the rehabilitation is not currently identified, understanding that the corridor offers
challenges as far as street width, available right of way, steep slopes, and proximity of natural assets
such as trees and Lotus Lake.
There are two main goals at this time:
Pavement rehabilitation
Safety improvements
DISCUSSION
6
There is a public open house scheduled for Tuesday, November 18th at City Hall to explore a host of
topics with the public, and to get a sense of how big of a project should be planned.
BUDGET
There is currently no budget defined for the project due to the limited definition of scope.
RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
7
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item Sign Code Discussion
File No.Item No: A.3
Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION
Prepared By Eric Maass, Community Development Director
Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen
SUGGESTED ACTION
No formal action; general discussion only.
Motion Type N/A
Strategic
Priority Development & Redevelopment
SUMMARY
The 2025 Community Development annual work plan included a review and update of the sign code.
Attached to this case is a memo that staff has prepared outlining the specific areas of the sign ordinance
that staff has flagged as needing to be updated. Staff is seeking feedback from the City Council on these
areas, as well as any other areas of the sign code that the City Council would like to see reviewed.
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
This effort is being conducted with regular staff duties, with assistance from the city attorney's office.
8
RECOMMENDATION
No formal recommendation; general discussion only.
ATTACHMENTS
Sign Ordinance Memo
9
To: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager
Prepared By: Community Development Department
Date: October 7, 2025
Subject: Sign Code Amendments
The 2025 Community Development Department's work plan includes review and potential
updates to the city’s sign ordinance.
BACKGROUND
The current sign ordinance can be found in Article 20-XXVI of the zoning code. The sign
regulations were written in 1995, amended multiple times since, most recently in 2022.
TEXT AMENDMENT SUMMARY
Definitions
Staff is proposing changes to the applicable sign code deflnitions to refiect current sign
design, reorganizing regulations to improve clarity and user experience, and ensuring
conformance with federal law.
Staff proposed revisions to the deflnitions for the following:
1. Clarifying language for readability and application.
2. Removing regulations within deflnitions and properly relocating them into
applicable sign code ordinances.
3. Removing unlawful regulation language or unlawful deflnitions.
Amending for Conformance with Law
The majority of the changes proposed by staff aim to conform with federal law, speciflcally
to ensure that no First Amendment violations occur. Federal case law from the lawsuit
Reed versus Town of Gilbert sets guidance for how a city may regulate signs. Courts
presume that sign ordinances that restrict speech, explicitly or implicitly, are
10
unconstitutional. Staff must review the city sign code to ensure ordinance language does
not refer to the content of the sign and subsequently regulate differently based on said
content.
Examples of potential flrst amendment violations
1. Deflnitions that categorize signage based on content.
2. Noncommercial signage being regulated speciflcally as to whether it is for a
campaign.
3. Community based signage limiting the content that applies for this particular
signage.
4. Garage sale signage regulates based on the content of the signage rather than
temporary residential nature.
5. Employment opportunity signage advertising speciflcally for job recruitment is
regulated separately.
6. Regulating corporate fiags.
Downtown Design Guidelines
The city recently adopted Downtown Design Guidelines which includes recommendations
for signage regulations. The guidelines call for the use of projecting signs within the
downtown area but currently are prohibited by the city’s sign code. Projecting signs were
included in the Downtown Design Guidelines as they are a feature typically found in a
downtown commercial area as they offer visual intrigue in addition to identiflcation value.
Staff proposes the following draft guidelines for projecting signs.
1. Must provide a clearance of 8’ from the adjacent sidewalk or flnished surface.
2. Each building tenant with an individual exterior entrance, may have 1 projecting sign
in addition to a traditional wall sign.
3. Projecting signs located on the flrst fioor shall not exceed 6 square feet.
4. Projecting signs located above the flrst fioor shall not exceed three (3) feet in height
per building story for the building face in which the projecting sign is located.
5. Projecting signs are limited to a projection distance of not more than four (4) feet.
This is measured from edge of building face to outer edge of the projecting sign
furthest from the building face.
Temporary Signs
Staff recommends prohibiting temporary feather fiag signs within the City of Chanhassen.
11
Currently city code requires temporary sign permits for banners, portable signs, infiatable
advertising devices, large fiags, and searchlights. City Staff would like City Council’s
opinion on if these permits should be continued, or if we should allow temporary signs
without permits with the same regulations
In 2025 the city received 8 permits, 2024 had 10 permits, and 2023 had 10 permits.
Approximately 4 of those permits every year are for one business utilizing the same banner
on multiple occasions throughout the year, this is equal to 42% of all the permits from 2023
to 2025. Staff additionally found a pattern of the same parcel with multiple business
comprising of another 14% of all the temporary sign permits from 2023 to 2025.
Based on this information staff is posing the question of if this permit should continue to be
required, or if we should allow this signage without a permit still subject to the same
regulations.
Improve Tangible Application
Through the implementation of the city code in sign permit reviews, there are areas of
needed clariflcation or simpliflcation. These changes will improve the customer
experience, reduce permit review time, and improve consistency in the application of the
city code.
Examples of recommended improvements include the following:
1. Window signage, current code is not easily interpreted and has multiple layers of
regulation rather than a straightforward percentage of window allowed to be
covered in signage.
PROCESS AND TIMELINE
Staff anticipates completing the sign ordinance amendment process prior to the end of the
year.
FEEDBACK REQUESTED
Staff is seeking the City Council’s feedback regarding the proposed amendments,
permitting requirement for temporary signage, and if there are any additional items City
Council would like staff to review as part of this ordinance review.
12
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item Future Work Session Schedule
File No.Item No: A.4
Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION
Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager
Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen
SUGGESTED ACTION
N/A
Motion Type N/A
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
The City Council is tentatively scheduled to hold the following work sessions:
November 24, 2025
Final Review of Proposed 2025 Levy, Budgets, and CIP for all funds
2050 Comp Plan process overview
Lake Ann Park Preserve update
December 15, 2025
City Council Roundtable
BACKGROUND
Staff or the City Council may suggest topics for work sessions. Dates are tentative until the meeting
agenda is published. Work sessions are typically held at 5:30 p.m. in conjunction with the regular City
Council meeting, but may be scheduled for other times as needed.
13
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
14
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item Approve City Council Meeting Minutes dated October 27, 2025
File No.Item No: D.1
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Jenny Potter, City Clerk
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council approves the City Council Meeting minutes dated October 27, 2025."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Chanhassen City Council approve the City Council Meeting minutes dated
October 27, 2025.
15
ATTACHMENTS
City Council Meeting minutes dated October 27, 2025
16
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
OCTOBER 27, 2025
Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of
Allegiance.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilmember McDonald, Councilmember
Schubert, Councilmember von Oven, and Councilmember Kimber.
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: None.
STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Eric Maass, Community Development Director;
Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director; and Jenny
Potter, City Clerk.
PUBLIC PRESENT: None.
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS:
1. Invitation to City Hall Open House on November 1
2. Old National Bank Recognition from the City of Chanhassen
Mayor Ryan recognized Old National Bank for their support during the City Hall construction.
Councilmember McDonald stated that Old National Bank served as a valuable partner to help build the
City Hall.
3. Southern Valley Alliance: Domestic Violence Awareness Month
A representative from Southern Valley Alliance shared updated information related to Southern Valley
Alliance and Domestic Violence Awareness Month.
Councilmember McDonald stated that Southern Valley Alliance was a great organization and provided a
great service while people are working through domestic issues.
CONSENT AGENDA: Councilmember McDonald moved, Councilmember von Oven seconded
that the City Council approve the following consent agenda items 1 through 11 pursuant to the City
Manager’s recommendations:
1. Approve City Council Minutes dated October 13, 2025
2. Approve City Council Work Session Minutes dated October 13, 2025
3. Approve Special City Council Meeting Minutes dated October 20, 2025
17
City Council Minutes – October 27, 2025
2
4. Receive Environmental Commission Minutes dated September 10, 2025
5. Receive Economic Development Commission Minutes
6. Approve Claims Paid dated October 27, 2025
7. Award 2026-2028 4th of July Fireworks Contract
8. Approve an Encroachment Agreement between the City of Chanhassen and the property owner at 824
Lone Eagle Drive
9. Approve a Site Plan Agreement for Eden Springs Assisted Living and Memory Care located at 1620
Arboretum Boulevard
10. Resolution 2025-71: Call for Public Hearing to Order the Great Plains Boulevard/Lake Drive East
Improvement Project
11. Resolution 2025-72: Approve Vacant Land Purchase from Carver County
All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. None.
FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATES. None.
PUBLIC HEARINGS.
1. Resolution 2025-73: Certification of Delinquent Utility Accounts and Code Enforcement
Charges to the County Auditor
Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director, reviewed the process for delinquent utility accounts.
Mayor Ryan opened the public hearing. There were no public comments.
Mayor Ryan closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Schubert moved, Councilmember Kimber seconded that the Chanhassen City
Council adopt a resolution certifying delinquent utility accounts and code enforcement charges to
the County Auditor. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
2. Resolution 2025-74: Accept Feasibility Study, Conduct Public Improvement Hearing, and
Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Market Boulevard Improvement
Project
Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, reviewed the project scope for the Market
Boulevard Improvement Project. He summarized the regional downtown water reuse system, which
supports permitting of multiple City projects. He provided an overview of the public engagement efforts
18
City Council Minutes – October 27, 2025
3
for the project and noted that they received one comment about the entry monument sign. He explained
the project funding summary and stated that the project was 43 percent City-funded and 57 percent
funded by outside sources. He reviewed the preliminary assessment map for the project and stated that
the assessment amounts were determined based on a front footage methodology. He summarized the
schedule and next steps for the project.
Mayor Ryan opened the public hearing. There were no public comments.
Mayor Ryan closed the public hearing.
Councilmember McDonald moved, Councilmember von Oven seconded that the Chanhassen City
Council adopt a Resolution Accepting the feasibility study, ordering the improvements, and
authorizing preparation of plans and specifications for the Market Boulevard Reconstruction
Project. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
GENERAL BUSINESS.
1. Adopt Ordinance 752: Amending Chapter 20 Zoning Regulations for Accessory Structures
Eric Maass, Community Development Director, reviewed the two requests for citizen action forms that
requested the city consider changes to the accessory structures ordinance. He summarized three
alternatives for an agricultural exemption for accessory structures.
Councilmember Kimber asked if there was part of the ordinance that restricts the accessory structure to
having less square footage than the primary structure. Mr. Maass answered that the current ordinance
alternatives did not place a cap on total square footage for an accessory structure based on the principle
structure. He stated that it was based on the zoning designation or the lot area, but they could add a
reference. He commented that they would want to note if it included the habitable place and the garage
space.
Councilmember Kimber said he did not want to define a cap but stated that the accessory structure could
not be larger than the primary structure. Mr. Maass answered that it could be added, but he did not think
an accessory structure would be larger than a primary structure.
Councilmember Kimber suggested that they add a cap.
Mayor Ryan asked if this was from when they were redoing the ordinance about adding onto an existing
structure, or if this was separate.
Councilmember Kimber said that he thought this was separate, as there are larger lots in town with
smaller homes. He asked if they would want to restrict the size of an accessory structure to be smaller
than the primary structure.
Councilmember von Oven said they had a lengthy discussion about additions to buildings, but did not
remember a conversation about an accessory structure.
19
City Council Minutes – October 27, 2025
4
Councilmember McDonald stated he did not want to limit the accessory structure size but wanted it to be
on a case-by-case basis. He stated that there were not many larger lots, so he did not think it would be an
issue.
Councilmember Kimber expressed an interest in Alternative A, as he thought it was clearer.
Councilmember Kimber moved, Councilmember Schubert seconded that the Chanhassen City
Council approves amending Chapter 20 Zoning Regulations for Accessory Structures as outlined
by Alternate A Ordinance. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5
to 0.
COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. None.
ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. None.
CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION.
1. 7331 Hazeltine Blvd Short Term Rental License
Councilmember Schubert moved, Councilmember McDonald seconded to adjourn the meeting. All
voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting
was adjourned at 7:44 p.m.
Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen
City Manager
Prepared by Jenny Potter
City Clerk
20
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item Approve City Council Work Session Minutes dated October 27, 2025.
File No.Item No: D.2
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Jenny Potter, City Clerk
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council approves the City Council Work Session Minutes dated October 27,
2025."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Chanhassen City Council approve the City Council Work Session minutes
dated October 27, 2025.
21
ATTACHMENTS
City Council Work Session minutes dated October 27, 2025
22
1
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
MINUTES
October 27, 2025
Mayor Ryan called the work session to order at 5:30 p.m.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilmember McDonald,
Councilmember von Oven, Councilmember Kimber, Councilmember Schubert
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT: Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Eric Maas, Planning
Director; Patrick Gavin, Communications Manager; Jenny Potter, City Clerk; Kelly Grinnell,
Finance Director
PUBLIC PRESENT:
Presentation of Capital Fund Budgets and 2026–2030 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director, presented details on vehicle and equipment replacements,
facility maintenance, transportation infrastructure, pavement management and park
improvements. This included a projected $1.4 million fund balance for the Vehicle and
Equipment Fund in 2026, a $4.8 million budget for annual street reconstruction, and plans for a
$350,000 levy by 2030 to support future park renovations. Discussion also covered upcoming
playground replacements at Lake Ann Park and Bandimere Community Park, completing the
Lake Ann Park Preserve project and continued reliance on grants and park dedication fees for
park development. Discussion centered on how best to balance ongoing neighborhood park
updates with upcoming major playground projects at Lake Ann and Bandimere Parks.
Highway 7 and Highway 41 Update
Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer, discussed the Highway 5 reconstruction
project beginning in 2026, a planned restriping effort by MnDOT to add dedicated turn lanes at
Longacres and Lake Lucy intersections, and the temporary traffic signal at MMSW. Mr. Howley
also outlined future roundabout projects near the middle school (programmed for 2028) and at
Lake Lucy, which could be constructed together if funding aligns. On Highway 7, the update
clarified the roles of three parallel efforts, a safety coalition, a new transportation management
organization, and MnDOT’s corridor study. All focused on improving safety and traffic flow
through coordinated planning and the upcoming 2029 MnDOT rehabilitation project.
Communications for the Highway 5 project is expected to begin once bids are awarded later this
fall
23
City Council Work Session Minutes – October 27, 2025
2
Mayor Ryan adjourned the work session at 6:50 P.M.
Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen
City Manager
Prepared by Jenny Potter
City Clerk
24
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item Receive Park and Recreation Commission Minutes dated August 26, 2025
File No.Item No: D.3
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Kate Vogt, Admin Support Specialist
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council receives the Park and Recreation Commission minutes dated August
26, 2025."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
25
August 26, 2025 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes
26
CHANHASSEN PARK AND
RECREATION COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
AUGUST 26, 2025
Chair Leisen called the meeting to order at 6:08 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rob Swanson; Kristin Fulkerson; Michael Leisen; Sean Morgan;
Emily Nagel; Kurt Scheppmann; Nora Nashawaty; and Clara Christenson, youth.
MEMBERS ABSENT: None.
STAFF PRESENT: Jerry Ruegemer, Park and Recreation Director; and Priya Wall, Recreation
Manager.
PUBLIC PRESENT: None.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Commissioner Swanson moved, Commissioner Fulkerson
seconded to approve the agenda as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried
unanimously with a vote of 8 to 0.
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: None.
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: None.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
1. Approve Park & Recreation Minutes dated July 22, 2025
Commissioner Fulkerson moved, Commissioner Nashawaty seconded to approve the
minutes of the Park and Recreation Commission meeting dated July 22, 2025 as presented.
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 8 to 0.
GENERAL BUSINESS:
1. Park Renovation Fund & Chanhassen Estates Mini Park Discussion
Jerry Ruegemer, Park and Recreation Director, summarized the different park facilities and staff
throughout Chanhassen. He reviewed the background of the Park Renovation Fund, which is
supported by a dedicated property tax levy and is utilized to replace or repair major park
equipment and infrastructure. He explained that previously, the city used surplus funds at the end
of the year for park renovation.
27
Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – August 26, 2025
2
Chair Leisen asked if there was a budget surplus, if it could still be used for park renovation, or if
the $100,000 is the cap of the funds. Mr. Ruegemer responded that it would be a possibility, but
the city also needs to save for long-term purchases, such as a firetruck.
Commissioner Fulkerson asked if the levy would continue beyond 2029. Mr. Ruegemer
answered that it would likely continue in the future, but he could not guarantee it.
Commissioner Swanson asked about the price increase between 2028 and 2029. Mr. Ruegemer
answered that it was a stepped or tiered percentage, so that the rate would be higher in 2029.
Commissioner Scheppmann asked if the $100,000 and subsequent years were allocated solely for
park renovation, excluding maintenance and capital expenditures. Mr. Ruegemer confirmed this
information.
Commissioner Scheppmann asked if the $180,000 had historically been allocated solely for park
renovation. Mr. Ruegemer answered that the $180,000 was for park renovation.
Mr. Ruegemer reviewed previous park improvements funded by the budget surplus.
Commissioner Morgan asked if the funds were set in stone since they were voted on by the City
Council. Mr. Ruegemer answered that the numbers were projected, but they could change either
way. He said that there was an aging park system that needed attention. He discussed utilizing
the operating budget for smaller projects.
Commissioner Nashawaty asked if they discussed the parks at the truth and taxation meeting.
Mr. Ruegemer said that they had postponed different playground replacements because of other
priorities. He said that there were a number of playgrounds that would need to be replaced over
the next four to five years.
Mr. Ruegemer summarized the improvements planned for the Carver Beach Playground.
Chair Lesisen asked if there was a fence around the baseball diamond. Mr. Ruegemer answered
that there was not, but they do not schedule the baseball field.
Youth Commissioner Christenson asked about parking. Mr. Ruegemer answered that there was
minimal parking at the location.
Mr. Ruegemer discussed the pickleball courts that had cracks and the alternative solution to
repair the courts.
28
Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – August 26, 2025
3
Commissioner Nashawaty asked about the plan to maintain the pickleball courts. Mr. Ruegemer
answered that the city plans to keep the outdoor facilities under city ownership, so they plan to
maintain them.
Mr. Ruegemer reviewed the planned expenses for the park improvements and noted that they
were just under the budget threshold. He discussed the Chanhassen Estates Mini Park to better
understand who utilized the park. He commented that he wanted the Park and Recreation
Commission to look at the existing playground and park to get a better picture of different
considerations.
Chair Leisen thanked him for the well-documented information. He would be curious about low-
cost alternatives for this park.
Commissioner Fulkerson asked if there would be interest in having a community garden there.
Commissioner Morgan asked what the cost would be to put in a modest parking lot. Mr.
Ruegemer responded that it would be more expensive than you would think.
Commissioner Nashawaty asked about easements near the properties to build a sidewalk and
then utilize the street parking.
Chair Leisen said that most neighborhood parks had small parking lots. Mr. Ruegemer answered
that they would not like to seek a model that utilized street parking.
Commissioner Swanson asked if there was an ideal proximity between parks. Mr. Ruegemer
answered about a half-mile.
Commissioner Nagel said if they decommission Chanhassen Estates Mini Park, they should
invest in Rice Marsh Park.
Commissioner Swanson said he had friends in that neighborhood who did not go to Chanhassen
Estates.
Youth Commissioner Christenson said that the park was only appealing to smaller children.
Commissioner Nagel emphasized the importance of pollinator gardens. She asked about the cost
to remove the existing infrastructure. Mr. Ruegemer answered that they would remove the
playground in-house.
Commissioner Fulkerson asked if it would be possible to get a dedicated crosswalk. Mr.
Ruegemer answered that it would be a heavy lift with the Engineering Department because they
do not like mid-block crosswalks.
29
Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – August 26, 2025
4
Commissioner Nashawaty asked about the ash trees. Mr. Ruegemer answered that it could
certainly be a part of the discussion if they are diagnosed as diseased trees.
2. Civic Campus Programming Discussion
Priya Wall, Recreation Manager, reviewed phase two of the Civic Campus Project scheduled for
completion during the summer of 2026.
Chair Leisen asked if there would still be a skating rink. Mr. Ruegemer confirmed this
information, but there would not be formalized hockey rinks.
Ms. Wall reviewed the previous request to focus on three strategic objectives. She noted that the
infrastructure policies were well-set, but they could focus on programming to make downtown a
magnet for community building. She stated that there was not a set budget for programming in
this space, but they could bring the desires into the budget discussion for 2026.
Chair Leisen noted that there were large events on the calendar that they would need to work
around. He asked for a refresher on these events. Ms. Wall reviewed the different community
events from January to December. She discussed additional programming, such as fitness
activities and game groups.
Ms. Wall said that they were larger style events, but not as many smaller events.
Commissioner Morgan expressed thanks for the approach to brainstorming. He asked if budgets
were flat, if there were events that would be better. Mr. Ruegemer answered that they did not
have a lot of money wrapped up in the programming. He thought a new space might attract title
sponsorships for events. He noted that they wanted to engage their business community and get
them involved to keep their costs lower.
Commissioner Nashawaty asked when they were expecting to have the outdoor space done. Mr.
Ruegemer answered that the goal was to have the space done by July 1st, but that is not a
guarantee, so they might need to have an alternative plan for July 4th.
Chair Leisen noted that the movie in the park attracted teenagers, so he asked if a regular movie
night would be beneficial.
Commissioner Fulkerson discussed the Café that occurs at the high school. She suggested a
similar activity.
Ms. Wall said that Supernova, a band made up of Chanhassen high schoolers, was the best-
attended event.
30
Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – August 26, 2025
5
Commissioner Nashawaty asked if one of the August Music Nights could be part of the kick-off
week for the new space. Ms. Wall answered that they hoped to do a kick-off event, and the
concert series would be at Lake Ann Park until that point.
Commissioner Swanson discussed the potential of doing a community day similar to the event at
the Chanhassen Recreation Center.
Youth Commissioner Christenson asked if they could do something with National Night Out,
such as providing free ice cream.
Commissioner Nashawaty asked about using National Night Out to advertise the kick-off week.
Commissioner Morgan said he saw poetry readings at the farmers' market.
Commissioner Swanson asked about partnering with the Renaissance fest. Ms. Wall answered
that they reached out in the past about booth space, so they might be interested.
Commissioner Fulkerson asked about partnering with Carlson’s Llamas.
Commissioner Nashwaty asked about a skating event or pickleball.
Youth Commissioner Christenson asked about collaborating with the library for an event as well.
Commissioner Nagel asked if there was an opportunity to do community art at the space. Ms.
Wall answered that they could explore a small version of community art.
Youth Commissioner Christenson said that graduating seniors can get a tile and paint on it, and
each senior class puts their tiles together. She asked if they could do something similar.
Commissioner Nashawaty asked if they could hang it in the building, or if they could have a
brick that would be donated to help with the costs of items. Mr. Ruegemer said that they had
bricks near the train depot, but it was not an active program.
Commissioner Nashawaty suggested a thumbprint as a leaf on a tree to incorporate a lot of
residents without a lot of footprint.
Commissioner Morgan asked if there were pop-up fitness events that could generate excitement
and be a continuous series. Ms. Wall said that Lifetime partners with Crispin’ Green. She said Fit
for Life might want to do an event.
Commissioner Nashawaty said there was a yoga studio called One Life Yoga that might be
interested in the event.
31
Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – August 26, 2025
6
Chair Leisen suggested smaller events throughout the summer.
Ms. Wall summarized the discussion about the potential for a kick-off week, including a
community art project, a summer movie night, and partnerships with other organizations to
provide smaller events throughout the week.
Commissioner Nashawaty suggested that they could create a subcommittee to plan events.
REPORTS:
Mr. Ruegemer provided an update about the Chanhassen Bluffs Recreation Center. He said they
were reducing the square footage and changing the exterior of the building and the roof design to
help reduce the costs. He said that they would be purchasing an extra three acres for future
considerations. He discussed that the goal was to have it open for Chanhassen High School
Graduation in Spring 2028. He stated that they were looking at ways to better orient the building
to help reduce the grading costs.
Commissioner Fulkerson advocated for a skate school.
Commissioner Morgan said that the restaurant space has evolved. Mr. Ruegemer said that the
restaurant spaces struggle. He said a catering kitchen would be appealing to host events, so they
did not feel like it was negative to lose the restaurant component.
Commissioner Nashawaty said she thought the event space would be popular.
Mr. Ruegemer provided an update on Lake Ann Park Preserve. He said he submitted the report
with the recommendations to the State Historic Preservation Office, and they have a 30-day
review. He said that the plan set was at 80 to 90 percent, so they did not want to redesign, and
they wanted to minimize impact. He discussed various challenges related to the project.
COMMISSION MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS: None.
COMMISSION MEMBER PRESENTATIONS: None.
ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS: None.
ADJOURNMENT:
Commissioner Swanson moved, Commissioner Fulkerson seconded to adjourn the meeting.
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 8 to 0. The Park and
Recreation Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:37 p.m.
Submitted by Jerry Ruegemer
Park and Recreation Director
32
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item Receive Commission on Aging Minutes dated August 15, 2025
File No.Item No: D.4
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Kate Vogt, Admin Support Specialist
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council receives the Commission on Aging Minutes dated August 15, 2025."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
August 15, 2025 Commission on Aging Minutes
33
Chanhassen Commission on Aging, August 15, 2025
The meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. by Commissioner Camarata.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Jim Camarata, Gwen Block, Jane Bender, Janet Dean, Phyllis Mobley, Barbara Solum, Bill
Monn
MEMBERS ABSENT: Beth Mason
GUESTS PRESENT: Linnea Fonnest, Chanhassen Library. Kara Cassidy, Carver County
Health and Human Services, Office of Aging; Linda Kerber, City of Carver resident.
CALL TO ORDER: Jim Camarata, Chair
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
The agenda was reviewed as submitted. Commissioner Block made a motion to approve the
agenda. Commissioner Mobley seconded. All members voted in favor; the motion was carried.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
June 20, 2025, minutes were reviewed. Commissioner Mobley made a motion to approve the
minutes. Commissioner Solum seconded. All members voted in favor; the motion was carried.
GENERAL BUSINESS:
4th of July Recap 4th of July Bingo was a success! Over 600 people participated in the free
Bingo event sponsored by the Commission and hosted by hosted by KDWB's Dave Ryan. Thirty
prize packages were created from the generous gift cards and givc-aways provided by local
businesses and organizations. This year’s fundraising efforts went to Senior Community Services
Tech Assistance Program and raised $1000 in donations.
Fall 55+ Health and Wellness Expo the Fall 55+ Health and Wellness Expo will be held
Wednesday, October 8th at the Chanhassen Recreation Center. This event highlights local
nonprofit programs and organizations and connects seniors with important resources.
Commissioner Check-In on Areas of Interest/Focus Projects –Commissioner Bender is
interested in working on marketing our resources for seniors better to the community, Patrick
Gavin will attend a meeting in September to discuss how City staff can help in that area.
Commissioner Mobley is interested in mental health and wellness; she will work with Mary on
future programs to offer on this topic. Commissioner Dean is interested in working with
Honoring Choices, related to health care directives and how to support seniors in creating them.
Commissioner Monn is interested better educating and connecting people to transportation
options in our community. Commissioners Block and Solum continue to assist as needed with
Senior Center programs and events.
34
Commission Sub-Committee Reports Commissioners Camarata and Mason continue to work
on resource guides and communications with local newspapers and magazines, with Camarata
posting regular articles related to housing issues.
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS:
Chanhassen Senior Center Upcoming Programs Mary shared with the commission that the
Fall Connection is now out, it has all the upcoming programing that is being offered. She
touched on some of that programming, inviting the commissioners to join in. The move in date
for the new Senior Center is to be determined but Mary is prepared to stay at the Recreation
Center through October, or until the new space is available.
Kara Cassidy, Carver County Health and Human Services, Office of Aging Commissioner
Camarata presented on behalf of Kara Cassidy. The annual meeting of Carver County
Commission on Aging will be held on September 5th, from 10 am until 1 pm at the Arboretum.
Chanhassen Library Linnea Fonnest presented on upcoming programming happening at the
Chanhassen Library this fall.
DISCUSSION
Guest Linda Kerber shared that she is gathering information on the possibility of creating a
Commission on Aging in the City of Carver. Commissioners shared resource and contact
information with her for moving forward. Linnea Fonnest discussed the issue of food insecurities
in the senior population. Carver County is working on creating Resource Navigators to help
people find resource information.
ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Mobley made a motion to approve adjournment. Commissioner Dean seconded.
All members voted in favor; the motion was carried. Meeting adjourned at 11:19 am.
Submitted by Mary Blazanin, Senior Center Coordinator
35
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item Receive Commission on Aging Minutes dated September 19, 2025
File No.Item No: D.5
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Kate Vogt, Admin Support Specialist
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council receives the Commission on Aging Minutes dated September 19,
2025."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority N/A
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
36
September 19, 2025 Commission on Aging Minutes
37
Chanhassen Commission on Aging, September 19, 2025
The meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. by Commissioner Camarata.
MEMBERS’ PRESENT:
Jim Camarata, Gwen Block, Jane Bender, Phyllis Mobley, Barbara Solum, Bill Monn, Beth
Mason
MEMBERS ABSENT: Janet Dean,
GUESTS PRESENT: Patrick Gavin, Chanhassen Communications Manager. Linnea Fonnest,
Chanhassen Library. Kara Cassidy, Carver County Health and Human Services, Office of Aging.
CALL TO ORDER: Jim Camarata, Chair
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
The agenda was reviewed, one correction was made related to guest attendance. Commissioner
Mobley made a motion to approve the agenda. Commissioner Mason seconded. All members
voted in favor; the motion was carried.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
August 15, 2025, minutes were reviewed. It was noted that Senior Community Service staff were
unable to attend. Commissioner Block made a motion to approve the minutes. Commissioner
Mobley seconded. All members voted in favor; the motion was carried.
GENERAL BUSINESS:
Commissioner Check-In on Areas of Interest/Focus Projects. Commissioner Bender has been
working with Patrick Gavin to create a way to push communication on senior programming,
working on an inclusive way to share the resources with all seniors, but possibly focusing on 40–
50-year-olds with parents in the community. Patrick shared the current avenues being used by the
City of Chanhassen and was able to share a few suggestions for starting points in reaching that
age group. Patrick will assist in developing a plan with Mary and Commissioner Bender.
Commissioner Mobley reported that her initiative to promote wellness programming will begin
in partnership with the Senior Center after the first of the year, 2026. She is reaching out to
resources to provide presentations and trainings on various issues.
Commissioner Monn discussed his initiative to gather information on the City’s transportation
options for seniors. He will be meeting with one of our council members as well as SW Transit
staff to learn more and will share that information with the Commissioners.
Commissioner Camarata further discussed the idea of putting out a survey to seniors in
Chanhassen.
Fall 55+ Health and Wellness. The Fall 55+ Health and Wellness Expo will be held on
Wednesday, October 8th, from 9:00 a.m. until 12:00 p.m. at the Chanhassen Recreation Center.
38
This event highlights local nonprofit programs and organizations and connects seniors with
important resources. Commissioners volunteered their time to attend and assist that day.
Mayor’s Luncheon. Mary shared details on the Mayor’s Luncheon happening on Tuesday,
October 7, 2025, starting at 11:00 a.m. and ending at 1:00 p.m. Registration is required.
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS:
Kara Cassidy, Carver County Health and Human Services, Office of Aging. Kara thanked
the commission for attending her County wide Senior Commssion event at the Arboretum and
shared that it went well. She also brought along some information on vaccinations, emergency
preparedness initiatives, and shared State and County resource ideas with the commissioners.
Chanhassen Senior Center Upcoming Programs. Mary shared with the commission some of
the upcoming Senior Center programs. There is a lot on the agenda for this fall season, mostly
trips as we transition to the new building, and she sees that it is reaching a very large range of
age groups.
Chanhassen Library. Linnea Fonnest summarized fall programming for the Chanhassen
Library. More information on this can be found in the library brochure.
DISCUSSION
ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Mobley made a motion to approve adjournment. Commissioner Solum seconded.
All members voted in favor; the motion was carried. Meeting adjourned at 11:33 am.
Submitted by Mary Blazanin, Senior Center Coordinator
39
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item Approve Claims Paid dated November 10, 2025
File No.Item No: D.6
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Danielle Washburn, Assistant Finance Director
Reviewed By Kelly Grinnell
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council Approves Claims Paid dated November 10, 2025."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Financial Sustainability
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
The following claims are submitted for review and approval on November 10, 2025:
Total Claims $4,227,277.53
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
40
ATTACHMENTS
Payment Summary
Payment Detail
41
Accounts Payable
Checks by Date - Summary
Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount
A Better Society 10/22/2025
0.00 750.00
ABM Equipment, LLC 10/22/2025
0.00 2,472.62
Across The Street Productions 10/22/2025
0.00 4,709.25
Ador LLC 10/22/2025
0.00 5,100.00
ALBERT WONG 10/22/2025
0.00 30.70
Alexis Siegel-Carlson 10/22/2025
0.00 8,910.00
ALL AMERICAN TITLE 10/22/2025
0.00 107.18
ALL AMERICAN TITLE 10/22/2025
0.00 128.96
American Pressure Inc 10/22/2025
0.00 254.39
AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 10/22/2025
0.00 84.54
AMY & ADAM WAKEFIELD 10/22/2025
0.00 112.52
ANA & ANTHONY TROWBRIDGE 10/22/2025
0.00 33.12
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 10/22/2025
0.00 80.98
Badger State Inspection LLC 10/22/2025
0.00 14,500.00
BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 10/22/2025
0.00 313.75
BOLTON & MENK INC 10/22/2025
0.00 299,696.26
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 10/22/2025
0.00 87,525.54
BROADCAST MUSIC INC 10/22/2025
0.00 428.64
BURNET TITLE 10/22/2025
0.00 52.45
BURNET TITLE 10/22/2025
0.00 124.41
BURNET TITLE 10/22/2025
0.00 54.51
BURNET TITLE 10/22/2025
0.00 65.82
BURNET TITLE 10/22/2025
0.00 23.81
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 10/22/2025
0.00 20,408.23
Capital Siding Windows & Roofing 10/22/2025
0.00 120.00
CDW GOVERNMENT LLC 10/22/2025
0.00 11,464.40
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 10/22/2025
0.00 1,051.66
CenturyLink 10/22/2025
0.00 128.96
Chan Three Development Inc 10/22/2025
0.00 4,509.89
City of Bloomington 10/22/2025
0.00 464.00
CONRAD A. WINKEL 10/22/2025
0.00 71.99
DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC. 10/22/2025
0.00 1,737.72
DANIEL S. SHREVE 10/22/2025
0.00 110.64
Dingman Custom Homes 10/22/2025
0.00 2,920.00
EDINA REALTY TITLE 10/22/2025
0.00 62.52
ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 10/22/2025
0.00 1,244.00
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE 10/22/2025
0.00 212.10
GRETCHEN & JOSEPH MEIER 10/22/2025
0.00 47.40
HAWKINS CHEMICAL 10/22/2025
0.00 4,044.52
HealthPartners, Inc. 10/22/2025
0.00 88,446.97
HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 10/22/2025
0.00 4,600.00
Houston Engineering Inc 10/22/2025
0.00 7,404.93
I & S Group, Inc 10/22/2025
0.00 38,122.12
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 10/22/2025
0.00 113.87
JACK BLY 10/22/2025
0.00 46.23
Page 1 of 3 42
Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount
JASON & ELIZABETH HERNANDEZ 10/22/2025
0.00 101.48
JASON & LI LEPAGE 10/22/2025
0.00 75.39
Juli Al-Hilwani 10/22/2025
0.00 412.50
KARLEY GIL VILLEGAS & TOMI SAWWER 10/22/2025
0.00 24.30
KELLY & ALEXANDER FETSCH 10/22/2025
0.00 1,496.20
KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 10/22/2025
0.00 46.00
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 10/22/2025
0.00 16,084.20
KonectaUSA LLC 10/22/2025
0.00 91,475.20
Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P 10/22/2025
0.00 3,333.33
Macqueen Emergency Group 10/22/2025
0.00 1,917.28
Marco Inc 10/22/2025
0.00 735.00
Marcy Bean 10/22/2025
0.00 1,000.00
MATTHEW SPILANE 10/22/2025
0.00 20.09
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 10/22/2025
0.00 621.78
Mesenbrink Construction and Engineering Inc 10/22/2025
0.00 1,957.28
Minnesota Valley Landscape Inc 10/22/2025
0.00 660.20
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 10/22/2025
0.00 382.42
MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 10/22/2025
0.00 139.43
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 10/22/2025
0.00 36.99
Noah Benscher 10/22/2025
0.00 5,300.00
NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 10/22/2025
0.00 625,462.95
OJARS PAPEDIS; TRUSTEE OF THE OJARS 10/22/2025
0.00 82.85
Pinnacle Pest Control 10/22/2025
0.00 730.00
PRESTIGE POOLS 10/22/2025
0.00 1,000.00
Pro-Tree Outdoor Services 10/22/2025
0.00 1,320.00
Rahamthunnisa Shaik 10/22/2025
0.00 165.00
Reem Danial 10/22/2025
0.00 302.40
RESULTS TITLE 10/22/2025
0.00 19.87
ROADKILL ANIMAL CONTROL 10/22/2025
0.00 129.00
SAM CHARCHIAN 10/22/2025
0.00 130.41
Silva Screenprinting & Dist, LLC 10/22/2025
0.00 98.11
SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 10/22/2025
0.00 254.56
Stericycle, Inc 10/22/2025
0.00 229.00
STEWART TITLE COMPANY 10/22/2025
0.00 68.56
STONE ARCH TITLE LLC 10/22/2025
0.00 48.44
StreetLight Data, Inc 10/22/2025
0.00 6,751.00
THE TITLE GROUP INC 10/22/2025
0.00 101.84
TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 10/22/2025
0.00 28.83
TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 10/22/2025
0.00 77.66
TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 10/22/2025
0.00 26.36
TY & CLAIRE MCDEVITT 10/22/2025
0.00 73.89
TYLER PAULSON 10/22/2025
0.00 77.85
VALLEY-RICH CO INC 10/22/2025
0.00 1,960.00
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 10/22/2025
0.00 19.69
WEST TITLE LLC 10/22/2025
0.00 8.38
XCEL ENERGY INC 10/22/2025
0.00 15,090.62
Across The Street Productions 10/29/2025
0.00 125.00
Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 10/29/2025
0.00 1,571.25
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 10/29/2025
0.00 942.22
Badger State Inspection LLC 10/29/2025
0.00 1,702.50
Bildeaux Services 10/29/2025
0.00 2,100.00
Bohlmann, Inc. 10/29/2025
0.00 123.50
BROADWAY AWARDS 10/29/2025
0.00 33.17
Page 2 of 3 43
Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount
Cathy Larson 10/29/2025
0.00 100.00
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 10/29/2025
0.00 22,872.45
CENTURYLINK 10/29/2025
0.00 592.99
Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 10/29/2025
0.00 91.26
DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC. 10/29/2025
0.00 232.84
Daniel Rademacher 10/29/2025
0.00 190.00
DENALI CUSTOM HOMES INC 10/29/2025
0.00 750.00
Ditch Witch of Minnesota & Iowa 10/29/2025
0.00 95.84
Dorsey and Whitney, LLP 10/29/2025
0.00 12,727.00
ECM PUBLISHERS INC 10/29/2025
0.00 604.35
Edina Heating & Cooling Inc 10/29/2025
0.00 8,044.00
Environmental Plant Services, Inc 10/29/2025
0.00 9,500.00
Eric Johnson 10/29/2025
0.00 50.00
Federal Signal Corporation 10/29/2025
0.00 7,345.00
Field Environmental Consulting Inc 10/29/2025
0.00 500.00
HAWKINS CHEMICAL 10/29/2025
0.00 11,597.91
Houston Engineering Inc 10/29/2025
0.00 9,571.25
Infosend, Inc 10/29/2025
0.00 4,001.89
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 10/29/2025
0.00 97.84
JI Tile LLC 10/29/2025
0.00 500.00
Karen Sazdoff 10/29/2025
0.00 50.00
Lawson Products, Inc. 10/29/2025
0.00 786.96
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 10/29/2025
0.00 50.00
Mark Hornung 10/29/2025
0.00 100.00
Metro Garage Door Company 10/29/2025
0.00 3,637.97
Michael Ewasiuk 10/29/2025
0.00 100.00
Michael LoScalzo 10/29/2025
0.00 50.00
Mike Hilgers 10/29/2025
0.00 1,009.00
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 10/29/2025
0.00 1,302.27
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 10/29/2025
0.00 195.23
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 10/29/2025
0.00 223.68
Nathan Burkett 10/29/2025
0.00 100.00
North American Safety, Inc. 10/29/2025
0.00 593.88
Panera LLC 10/29/2025
0.00 7,100.00
Patrick Gavin 10/29/2025
0.00 837.61
POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 10/29/2025
0.00 684.20
Rachel Arsenault 10/29/2025
0.00 31.64
Ross Reeves 10/29/2025
0.00 100.00
Ryan Contracting Company 10/29/2025
0.00 1,661,667.79
SEH 10/29/2025
0.00 1,744.57
SM HENTGES & SONS 10/29/2025
0.00 928,827.68
SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 10/29/2025
0.00 16.62
Southwest Rental & Sales 10/29/2025
0.00 119.35
SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION 10/29/2025
0.00 623.00
Thomas Olson 10/29/2025
0.00 32,000.00
Timothy Remington 10/29/2025
0.00 541.50
Twin Cities Transport & Recovery, Inc 10/29/2025
0.00 150.00
VERIZON WIRELESS 10/29/2025
0.00 190.16
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 10/29/2025
0.00 41,376.68
XCEL ENERGY INC 10/29/2025
0.00 34,875.54
Zillmer Tree Management LLC 10/29/2025
0.00 19,162.00
Report Total:0.00 4,227,277.53
Page 3 of 3 44
AP
Check Detail
User: dwashburn@chanhassenmn.gov
Printed: 10/31/2025 9:53:03 AM
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Bildeaux Services 700-0000-4370 350.00 10/29/2025 chainsaw safety training
Bildeaux Services 101-1550-4370 700.00 10/29/2025 chainsaw safety training
Bildeaux Services 101-1320-4370 700.00 10/29/2025 chainsaw safety training
Bildeaux Services 701-0000-4370 350.00 10/29/2025 chainsaw safety training
2,100.00 10/29/2025
Bildeaux Services 2,100.00
A Better Society 101-1425-4300 750.00 10/22/2025 Mobile Bike Repair Clinic
750.00 10/22/2025
A Better Society 750.00
ABM Equipment, LLC 101-1550-4530 2,472.62 10/22/2025 garbage truck repair
2,472.62 10/22/2025
ABM Equipment, LLC 2,472.62
Across The Street Productions 101-1220-4370 4,709.25 10/22/2025 Annual Blue Card Subscription for Fire Dept
4,709.25 10/22/2025
Across The Street Productions 101-1220-4360 125.00 10/29/2025 Young Blue Card Subscription
125.00 10/29/2025
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 1 of 31
45
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Across The Street Productions 4,834.25
Ador LLC 101-0000-2073 5,100.00 10/22/2025 Erosion escrow 6681 Galpin Blvd #581794
5,100.00 10/22/2025
Ador LLC 5,100.00
Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 700-0000-4300 785.62 10/29/2025 pw/city hall generator. troubleshooting ls 23
Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 701-0000-4300 785.63 10/29/2025 pw/city hall generator. troubleshooting ls 23
1,571.25 10/29/2025
Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 1,571.25
Al-Hilwani Juli 101-1530-4347 412.50 10/22/2025 Personal Training
412.50 10/22/2025
Al-Hilwani Juli 412.50
ALL AMERICAN TITLE 700-0000-2020 1.69 10/22/2025 Refund Check 011432-000, 6636 BRENDEN COURT
ALL AMERICAN TITLE 700-0000-2020 30.21 10/22/2025 Refund Check 011432-000, 6636 BRENDEN COURT
ALL AMERICAN TITLE 720-0000-2020 23.88 10/22/2025 Refund Check 011432-000, 6636 BRENDEN COURT
ALL AMERICAN TITLE 701-0000-2020 51.40 10/22/2025 Refund Check 011432-000, 6636 BRENDEN COURT
ALL AMERICAN TITLE 700-0000-2020 35.01 10/22/2025 Refund Check 008294-000, 2227 STONE CREEK LANE EAST
ALL AMERICAN TITLE 720-0000-2020 17.91 10/22/2025 Refund Check 008294-000, 2227 STONE CREEK LANE EAST
ALL AMERICAN TITLE 700-0000-2020 1.27 10/22/2025 Refund Check 008294-000, 2227 STONE CREEK LANE EAST
ALL AMERICAN TITLE 701-0000-2020 74.77 10/22/2025 Refund Check 008294-000, 2227 STONE CREEK LANE EAST
236.14 10/22/2025
ALL AMERICAN TITLE 236.14
American Pressure Inc 101-1370-4530 375.72 10/22/2025 pressure washer parts
American Pressure Inc 101-1370-4530 -121.33 10/22/2025 pressure washer parts
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 2 of 31
46
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
254.39 10/22/2025
American Pressure Inc 254.39
AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 101-1550-4120 84.54 10/22/2025 tire
84.54 10/22/2025
AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 84.54
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4112 80.98 10/22/2025 Water Filter (received invoice late)
80.98 10/22/2025
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4112 289.33 10/29/2025 Coffee for City Hall
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4112 335.38 10/29/2025 PW Coffee Order
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4112 317.51 10/29/2025 Fire Coffee Order
942.22 10/29/2025
ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 1,023.20
Arsenault Rachel 101-1420-4381 31.64 10/29/2025 Mileage to/from Campbell Knutson
31.64 10/29/2025
Arsenault Rachel 31.64
Badger State Inspection LLC 700-7019-4550 14,500.00 10/22/2025 Exterior Power Wash -1879 Lake Lucy
14,500.00 10/22/2025
Badger State Inspection LLC 101-1310-4359 202.50 10/29/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425
Badger State Inspection LLC 700-0000-4303 1,500.00 10/29/2025 Additional Trips for Landscaping Review
1,702.50 10/29/2025
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 3 of 31
47
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Badger State Inspection LLC 16,202.50
Bean Marcy 720-0000-4905 1,000.00 10/22/2025 Reimburse for RainGarden @1600 Koehnen Cir E
1,000.00 10/22/2025
Bean Marcy 1,000.00
BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 101-0000-2012 123.75 10/22/2025 Cobra admin/retiree billing
BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 101-1120-4351 70.00 10/22/2025 Cobra qualifying event letters
BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 101-1120-4351 120.00 10/22/2025 Tax Advantage Plan-Oct Nov & Dec
313.75 10/22/2025
BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 313.75
Benscher Noah 414-4010-4703 5,300.00 10/22/2025 Office Chairs
5,300.00 10/22/2025
Benscher Noah 5,300.00
BLY JACK 700-0000-2020 7.59 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103420-000, 6515 GRAY FOX CURVE
BLY JACK 700-0000-2020 1.30 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103420-000, 6515 GRAY FOX CURVE
BLY JACK 701-0000-2020 18.95 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103420-000, 6515 GRAY FOX CURVE
BLY JACK 720-0000-2020 18.39 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103420-000, 6515 GRAY FOX CURVE
46.23 10/22/2025
BLY JACK 46.23
Bohlmann, Inc.101-1550-4300 123.50 10/29/2025 Memorial plaque
123.50 10/29/2025
Bohlmann, Inc. 123.50
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 4 of 31
48
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
BOLTON & MENK INC 101-1310-4359 84.40 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425
BOLTON & MENK INC 700-6048-4300 365.72 10/22/2025 Water @ 13%
BOLTON & MENK INC 601-6048-4300 1,884.88 10/22/2025 PMP @ 67%
BOLTON & MENK INC 601-6053-4303 56,142.00 10/22/2025 PMP @ 60%
BOLTON & MENK INC 720-6048-4300 196.93 10/22/2025 Storm @ 7%
BOLTON & MENK INC 720-6053-4303 20,585.40 10/22/2025 Storm @ 22%
BOLTON & MENK INC 701-6048-4300 3,227.70 10/22/2025 Sanitary @ 13%
BOLTON & MENK INC 601-6053-4303 44,475.90 10/22/2025 PMP @ 60%
BOLTON & MENK INC 701-6053-4303 5,930.12 10/22/2025 Sanitary @ 8%
BOLTON & MENK INC 601-6048-4300 16,635.10 10/22/2025 PMP @ 67%
BOLTON & MENK INC 601-6053-4303 52,610.70 10/22/2025 PMP @ 60%
BOLTON & MENK INC 700-6053-4303 8,768.45 10/22/2025 Water @ 10%
BOLTON & MENK INC 700-6048-4300 3,227.70 10/22/2025 Water @ 13%
BOLTON & MENK INC 720-6048-4300 1,738.00 10/22/2025 Storm @ 7%
BOLTON & MENK INC 720-6053-4303 16,307.83 10/22/2025 Storm @ 22%
BOLTON & MENK INC 700-6053-4303 7,412.65 10/22/2025 Water @ 10%
BOLTON & MENK INC 101-1310-4359 1,315.27 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425
BOLTON & MENK INC 701-6048-4300 1,596.72 10/22/2025 Sanitary @ 13%
BOLTON & MENK INC 720-6048-4300 859.78 10/22/2025 Storm @ 7%
BOLTON & MENK INC 101-1310-4359 184.24 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425
BOLTON & MENK INC 700-6048-4300 1,596.72 10/22/2025 Water @ 13%
BOLTON & MENK INC 601-6048-4300 8,229.28 10/22/2025 PMP @ 67%
BOLTON & MENK INC 101-1310-4359 2,807.10 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425
BOLTON & MENK INC 701-6048-4300 365.72 10/22/2025 Sewer @ 13%
BOLTON & MENK INC 701-6053-4303 7,485.60 10/22/2025 Sanitary @ 8%
BOLTON & MENK INC 700-6053-4303 9,357.00 10/22/2025 Water @ 10%
BOLTON & MENK INC 701-6053-4303 7,014.76 10/22/2025 Sanitary @ 8%
BOLTON & MENK INC 720-6053-4303 19,290.59 10/22/2025 Storm @ 22%
299,696.26 10/22/2025
BOLTON & MENK INC 299,696.26
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 601-6040-4300 2,978.50 10/22/2025 City @ 25%
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 101-1310-4359 357.42 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 601-6140-4300 8,935.50 10/22/2025 County @ 75%
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 101-1310-4359 567.02 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 601-6060-4300 12,600.50 10/22/2025 Construction Materials Testing #24-01
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 101-1310-4359 447.05 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 700-6053-4303 2,032.30 10/22/2025 Water @ 10%
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 601-6053-4303 12,193.80 10/22/2025 PMP @ 60%
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 701-6053-4303 1,625.84 10/22/2025 Sanitary @ 8%
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 5 of 31
49
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 720-6053-4303 4,471.06 10/22/2025 Storm @ 22%
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 601-6048-4303 8,720.00 10/22/2025 Crimson Bay Rd -CMT
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 414-4010-4303 4,517.00 10/22/2025 Civic Campus -CMT
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 601-6040-4300 3,725.37 10/22/2025 City @ 25%
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 601-6140-4300 11,176.13 10/22/2025 County @ 75%
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 601-6053-4303 3,316.00 10/22/2025 25-01 Construction Materials Testing
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 101-1310-4359 99.48 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 601-6064-4303 9,618.30 10/22/2025 #26-01 - Vasserman Ridge & Fox Hollow
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 101-1310-4359 144.27 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425
87,525.54 10/22/2025
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 87,525.54
BROADCAST MUSIC INC 101-1530-4125 428.64 10/22/2025 1yr Music Rights Fee includes timely pay discount
428.64 10/22/2025
BROADCAST MUSIC INC 428.64
BROADWAY AWARDS 101-1120-4110 33.17 10/29/2025 Sam D and Joe S Nametags
33.17 10/29/2025
BROADWAY AWARDS 33.17
Burkett Nathan 700-7204-4901 100.00 10/29/2025 Water Wise Rebate- Dishwasher
100.00 10/29/2025
Burkett Nathan 100.00
BURNET TITLE 720-0000-2020 15.60 10/22/2025 Refund Check 013941-000, 1890 PARTRIDGE CIRCLE
BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 1.11 10/22/2025 Refund Check 013941-000, 1890 PARTRIDGE CIRCLE
BURNET TITLE 701-0000-2020 23.86 10/22/2025 Refund Check 013941-000, 1890 PARTRIDGE CIRCLE
BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 25.25 10/22/2025 Refund Check 013941-000, 1890 PARTRIDGE CIRCLE
BURNET TITLE 720-0000-2020 55.19 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018705-000, 7000 CHAPARRAL LANE
BURNET TITLE 701-0000-2020 66.34 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018705-000, 7000 CHAPARRAL LANE
BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 2.88 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018705-000, 7000 CHAPARRAL LANE
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 6 of 31
50
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
BURNET TITLE 701-0000-2020 14.41 10/22/2025 Refund Check 100744-000, 553 MISSION HILLS DRIVE
BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 1.06 10/22/2025 Refund Check 100744-000, 553 MISSION HILLS DRIVE
BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 5.76 10/22/2025 Refund Check 100744-000, 553 MISSION HILLS DRIVE
BURNET TITLE 720-0000-2020 2.58 10/22/2025 Refund Check 100744-000, 553 MISSION HILLS DRIVE
BURNET TITLE 701-0000-2020 11.78 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103812-000, 9195 EAGLE RIDGE ROAD
BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 0.92 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103812-000, 9195 EAGLE RIDGE ROAD
BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 28.80 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103812-000, 9195 EAGLE RIDGE ROAD
BURNET TITLE 720-0000-2020 13.01 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103812-000, 9195 EAGLE RIDGE ROAD
BURNET TITLE 720-0000-2020 16.52 10/22/2025 Refund Check 097057-000, 8795 NORTH BAY DRIVE
BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 1.17 10/22/2025 Refund Check 097057-000, 8795 NORTH BAY DRIVE
BURNET TITLE 701-0000-2020 22.06 10/22/2025 Refund Check 097057-000, 8795 NORTH BAY DRIVE
BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 12.70 10/22/2025 Refund Check 097057-000, 8795 NORTH BAY DRIVE
321.00 10/22/2025
BURNET TITLE 321.00
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 101-0000-2076 600.00 10/22/2025 Pioneer Ridge Development Escrow
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 101-1140-4302 18,319.09 10/22/2025 Legal Fees-September 2025
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 601-6040-4701 79.66 10/22/2025 Galpin Blvd 25% City
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 101-0000-2076 1,080.00 10/22/2025 Avienda Apartments Escrow
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 601-6140-4701 238.98 10/22/2025 Galpin Blvd 75% County
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 601-6058-4701 90.50 10/22/2025 MMSW Condemnation
20,408.23 10/22/2025
CAMPBELL KNUTSON 20,408.23
Capital Siding Windows & Roofing 101-1250-3301 120.00 10/22/2025 Permit cancelled - 4137 Red Oak Ln
120.00 10/22/2025
Capital Siding Windows & Roofing 120.00
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1120-1193 69.91 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-7019-4320 1,051.52 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1540-4320 207.71 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1550-4320 227.93 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1600-4320 17.02 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-0000-4320 75.57 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 7 of 31
51
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 701-0000-4320 1,301.46 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1540-4320 357.51 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1350-4320 2,970.86 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1350-4320 1,793.92 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-7019-4320 1,774.34 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1120-1193 73.55 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-7019-4320 1,124.85 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-0000-4320 75.25 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 701-0000-4320 776.10 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1550-4320 381.08 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1600-4320 29.18 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-0000-4320 112.80 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1120-1193 121.61 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1550-4320 236.72 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1600-4320 17.81 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1540-4320 217.19 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-7019-4320 617.75 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1550-4320 123.59 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 701-0000-4320 402.56 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-0000-4320 90.01 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1350-4320 2,085.04 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1600-4320 20.78 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-7019-4320 1,311.40 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1350-4320 1,014.55 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1120-1193 41.24 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-0000-4320 30.79 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1540-4320 119.09 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1540-4320 253.29 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 701-0000-4320 765.07 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1350-4320 1,700.77 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 701-0000-4320 909.95 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1600-4320 9.74 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1550-4320 277.37 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1120-1193 85.57 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
22,872.45 10/29/2025
CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 22,872.45
CDW GOVERNMENT LLC 101-1160-4205 11,464.40 10/22/2025 Cybereason EDR/MDR Annual Renewal
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 8 of 31
52
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
11,464.40 10/22/2025
CDW GOVERNMENT LLC 11,464.40
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1190-4321 120.77 10/22/2025 Gas Charges
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1220-4321 104.96 10/22/2025 Gas Charges
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1530-4321 68.33 10/22/2025 Gas Charges
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1170-4321 411.02 10/22/2025 Gas Charges
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 700-7019-4321 37.90 10/22/2025 Gas Charges
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1312-4321 85.12 10/22/2025 Gas Charges
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 700-0000-4321 32.64 10/22/2025 Gas Charges
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 701-0000-4321 46.07 10/22/2025 Gas Charges
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1600-4321 22.00 10/22/2025 Gas Charges
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1550-4321 37.00 10/22/2025 Gas Charges
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 700-7043-4321 85.85 10/22/2025 Gas Charges
1,051.66 10/22/2025
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 1,051.66
CenturyLink 701-0000-4310 32.00 10/22/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges
CenturyLink 700-0000-4310 32.00 10/22/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges
CenturyLink 700-7043-4310 64.96 10/22/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges
128.96 10/22/2025
CENTURYLINK 700-0000-4310 15.62 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges
CENTURYLINK 101-1350-4310 30.85 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges
CENTURYLINK 701-0000-4310 15.62 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges
CENTURYLINK 701-0000-4310 6.17 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges
CENTURYLINK 700-0000-4310 6.17 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges
CENTURYLINK 101-1540-4310 62.06 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges
CENTURYLINK 101-1550-4310 30.85 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges
CENTURYLINK 700-7019-4310 217.21 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges
CENTURYLINK 101-1312-4310 49.36 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges
CENTURYLINK 101-1170-4310 159.08 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges
592.99 10/29/2025
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 9 of 31
53
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
CENTURYLINK 721.95
Chan Three Development Inc 601-6040-4300 1,110.81 10/22/2025 City @ 25%
Chan Three Development Inc 601-6140-4300 3,332.43 10/22/2025 County @ 75%
Chan Three Development Inc 101-1310-4359 66.65 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425
4,509.89 10/22/2025
Chan Three Development Inc 4,509.89
CHARCHIAN SAM 720-0000-2020 7.72 10/22/2025 Refund Check 095464-000, 8795 BELLEVUE COURT
CHARCHIAN SAM 700-0000-2020 0.55 10/22/2025 Refund Check 095464-000, 8795 BELLEVUE COURT
CHARCHIAN SAM 701-0000-2020 21.96 10/22/2025 Refund Check 095464-000, 8795 BELLEVUE COURT
CHARCHIAN SAM 700-0000-2020 100.18 10/22/2025 Refund Check 095464-000, 8795 BELLEVUE COURT
130.41 10/22/2025
CHARCHIAN SAM 130.41
City of Bloomington 720-0000-4323 464.00 10/22/2025 Beach Monitoring
464.00 10/22/2025
City of Bloomington 464.00
Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 701-0000-2008 15.30 10/29/2025 October premium
Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 700-0000-2008 75.96 10/29/2025 October premium
91.26 10/29/2025
Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 91.26
DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.101-1120-4110 1,737.72 10/22/2025 Cleaning Supplies
1,737.72 10/22/2025
DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.101-1120-4110 232.84 10/29/2025 Cleaning Supplies
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 10 of 31
54
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
232.84 10/29/2025
DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC. 1,970.56
Danial Reem 101-1539-4343 302.40 10/22/2025 Zumba Instructor
302.40 10/22/2025
Danial Reem 302.40
DENALI CUSTOM HOMES INC 101-0000-2075 750.00 10/29/2025 Landscape Escrow-7450 Chanhassen Rd.
750.00 10/29/2025
DENALI CUSTOM HOMES INC 750.00
Dingman Custom Homes 101-0000-2073 2,920.00 10/22/2025 Erosion escrow 3870 Glendale Dr #528097
2,920.00 10/22/2025
Dingman Custom Homes 2,920.00
Ditch Witch of Minnesota & Iowa 101-1320-4120 95.84 10/29/2025 fuel filter
95.84 10/29/2025
Ditch Witch of Minnesota & Iowa 95.84
Dorsey and Whitney, LLP 416-0000-4302 12,727.00 10/29/2025 Comm Center Land Acquisition
12,727.00 10/29/2025
Dorsey and Whitney, LLP 12,727.00
ECM PUBLISHERS INC 101-1250-4300 28.21 10/29/2025 PH Notice - Delinquent Code Violations
ECM PUBLISHERS INC 700-0000-4336 145.08 10/29/2025 PH Notice - Delinquent Utilities
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 11 of 31
55
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
ECM PUBLISHERS INC 101-1310-4336 285.98 10/29/2025 PH Dogwood Vacation 10.13.25
ECM PUBLISHERS INC 701-0000-4336 145.08 10/29/2025 PH Notice - Delinquent Utilities
604.35 10/29/2025
ECM PUBLISHERS INC 604.35
Edina Heating & Cooling Inc 700-0000-4510 7,785.00 10/29/2025 R&R mini split well#2
Edina Heating & Cooling Inc 101-1550-4510 259.00 10/29/2025 Furnace Repair 7700 Lake Ann Park Dr
8,044.00 10/29/2025
Edina Heating & Cooling Inc 8,044.00
EDINA REALTY TITLE 700-0000-2020 13.95 10/22/2025 Refund Check 014171-000, 1110 DOVE COURT
EDINA REALTY TITLE 720-0000-2020 15.84 10/22/2025 Refund Check 014171-000, 1110 DOVE COURT
EDINA REALTY TITLE 701-0000-2020 31.61 10/22/2025 Refund Check 014171-000, 1110 DOVE COURT
EDINA REALTY TITLE 700-0000-2020 1.12 10/22/2025 Refund Check 014171-000, 1110 DOVE COURT
62.52 10/22/2025
EDINA REALTY TITLE 62.52
Environmental Plant Services, Inc 414-4010-4702 9,500.00 10/29/2025 Hazmat removals - City Hall
9,500.00 10/29/2025
Environmental Plant Services, Inc 9,500.00
ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 720-7207-4150 1,244.00 10/22/2025 stormwater ring
1,244.00 10/22/2025
ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 1,244.00
Ewasiuk Michael 700-7204-4901 100.00 10/29/2025 Water Wise Rebate- Clothes Washer
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 12 of 31
56
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
100.00 10/29/2025
Ewasiuk Michael 100.00
Federal Signal Corporation 402-4020-4530 7,345.00 10/29/2025 Emergency Siren #9 Control Box replacement
7,345.00 10/29/2025
Federal Signal Corporation 7,345.00
FETSCH KELLY & ALEXANDER 700-0000-2020 755.66 10/22/2025 Refund Check 097947-000, 8572 ALISA COURT
FETSCH KELLY & ALEXANDER 720-0000-2020 243.60 10/22/2025 Refund Check 097947-000, 8572 ALISA COURT
FETSCH KELLY & ALEXANDER 700-0000-2020 17.26 10/22/2025 Refund Check 097947-000, 8572 ALISA COURT
FETSCH KELLY & ALEXANDER 701-0000-2020 479.68 10/22/2025 Refund Check 097947-000, 8572 ALISA COURT
1,496.20 10/22/2025
FETSCH KELLY & ALEXANDER 1,496.20
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE 700-0000-2020 1.06 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102324-000, 6381 OXBOW BEND
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE 700-0000-2020 165.10 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102324-000, 6381 OXBOW BEND
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE 720-0000-2020 14.97 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102324-000, 6381 OXBOW BEND
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE 701-0000-2020 30.97 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102324-000, 6381 OXBOW BEND
212.10 10/22/2025
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE 212.10
Field Environmental Consulting Inc 414-4010-4702 500.00 10/29/2025 Civic Campus Asbestos Abatement
500.00 10/29/2025
Field Environmental Consulting Inc 500.00
Gavin Patrick 101-1125-4381 837.61 10/29/2025 LV Conference
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 13 of 31
57
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
837.61 10/29/2025
Gavin Patrick 837.61
GIL VILLEGAS & TOMI SAWWER KARLEY 701-0000-2020 13.74 10/22/2025 Refund Check 104388-000, 7051 CHAPARRAL LANE
GIL VILLEGAS & TOMI SAWWER KARLEY 700-0000-2020 3.21 10/22/2025 Refund Check 104388-000, 7051 CHAPARRAL LANE
GIL VILLEGAS & TOMI SAWWER KARLEY 720-0000-2020 6.86 10/22/2025 Refund Check 104388-000, 7051 CHAPARRAL LANE
GIL VILLEGAS & TOMI SAWWER KARLEY 700-0000-2020 0.49 10/22/2025 Refund Check 104388-000, 7051 CHAPARRAL LANE
24.30 10/22/2025
GIL VILLEGAS & TOMI SAWWER KARLEY 24.30
HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7043-4160 4,044.52 10/22/2025 chemicals west treatment plant
4,044.52 10/22/2025
HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7043-4160 3,833.53 10/29/2025 chemicals
HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7019-4160 7,764.38 10/29/2025 chemicals supplies
11,597.91 10/29/2025
HAWKINS CHEMICAL 15,642.43
HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 70,755.69 10/22/2025 Health premium-November
HealthPartners, Inc.701-0000-2012 3,655.86 10/22/2025 Health premium-November
HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2013 4,228.48 10/22/2025 Dental premium-November
HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 2,251.26 10/22/2025 Health premium-November
HealthPartners, Inc.700-0000-2012 5,537.31 10/22/2025 Health premium-November
HealthPartners, Inc.720-0000-2012 1,297.56 10/22/2025 Health premium-November
HealthPartners, Inc.700-0000-2013 336.38 10/22/2025 Dental premium-November
HealthPartners, Inc.701-0000-2013 288.35 10/22/2025 Dental premium-November
HealthPartners, Inc.720-0000-2013 96.08 10/22/2025 Dental premium-November
88,446.97 10/22/2025
HealthPartners, Inc. 88,446.97
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 14 of 31
58
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
HERNANDEZ JASON & ELIZABETH 700-0000-2020 1.32 10/22/2025 Refund Check 101087-000, 1710 VALLEY RIDGE TR S
HERNANDEZ JASON & ELIZABETH 701-0000-2020 49.73 10/22/2025 Refund Check 101087-000, 1710 VALLEY RIDGE TR S
HERNANDEZ JASON & ELIZABETH 720-0000-2020 18.63 10/22/2025 Refund Check 101087-000, 1710 VALLEY RIDGE TR S
HERNANDEZ JASON & ELIZABETH 700-0000-2020 31.80 10/22/2025 Refund Check 101087-000, 1710 VALLEY RIDGE TR S
101.48 10/22/2025
HERNANDEZ JASON & ELIZABETH 101.48
Hilgers Mike 601-6053-4751 1,009.00 10/29/2025 Driveway Reimbursement
1,009.00 10/29/2025
Hilgers Mike 1,009.00
HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 414-4010-4300 4,600.00 10/22/2025 Civic Campus Planning & LA
4,600.00 10/22/2025
HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 4,600.00
Hornung Mark 700-7204-4901 100.00 10/29/2025 Water Wise Rebate-Clothes Washer
100.00 10/29/2025
Hornung Mark 100.00
Houston Engineering Inc 101-1310-4359 109.43 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425
Houston Engineering Inc 601-6054-4303 7,295.50 10/22/2025 26-01
7,404.93 10/22/2025
Houston Engineering Inc 400-0000-1155 1,403.00 10/29/2025 Audubon Business Park
Houston Engineering Inc 400-0000-1155 61.00 10/29/2025 Xcel Service Center
Houston Engineering Inc 701-7025-4300 8,107.25 10/29/2025 Lift Station #5
9,571.25 10/29/2025
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 15 of 31
59
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Houston Engineering Inc 16,976.18
I & S Group, Inc 601-6064-4303 19,617.50 10/22/2025 2026 Lake Dr E Project
I & S Group, Inc 101-1310-4359 588.53 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425
I & S Group, Inc 601-6064-4303 5,572.50 10/22/2025 professional services
I & S Group, Inc 101-1310-4359 83.59 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425
I & S Group, Inc 601-6064-4303 12,260.00 10/22/2025 2026 Lake Dr E Project
38,122.12 10/22/2025
I & S Group, Inc 38,122.12
Infosend, Inc 720-1130-4111 294.25 10/29/2025 September Statements
Infosend, Inc 700-1130-4111 294.26 10/29/2025 September Statements
Infosend, Inc 701-1130-4330 1,039.71 10/29/2025 September Postage
Infosend, Inc 701-1130-4111 294.26 10/29/2025 September Statements
Infosend, Inc 720-1130-4330 1,039.70 10/29/2025 September Postage
Infosend, Inc 700-1130-4330 1,039.71 10/29/2025 September Postage
4,001.89 10/29/2025
Infosend, Inc 4,001.89
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1120-4110 113.87 10/22/2025 Printer Paper Postit Notes Pens
113.87 10/22/2025
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1120-4110 97.84 10/29/2025 Address labels
97.84 10/29/2025
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 211.71
JI Tile LLC 101-0000-2073 500.00 10/29/2025 Erosion escrow 2125 Longacres Dr #695559
500.00 10/29/2025
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 16 of 31
60
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
JI Tile LLC 500.00
Johnson Eric 700-7204-4901 50.00 10/29/2025 Water Wise Rebate- Irrigation Controller
50.00 10/29/2025
Johnson Eric 50.00
KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 101-1140-4302 46.00 10/22/2025 Labor/Employment Matters
46.00 10/22/2025
KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 46.00
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 601-6059-4300 16,084.20 10/22/2025 Pleasant View Rd
16,084.20 10/22/2025
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 16,084.20
KonectaUSA LLC 414-4010-4702 91,475.20 10/22/2025 Civic Campus First Responder Radio Repeater
91,475.20 10/22/2025
KonectaUSA LLC 91,475.20
Larson Cathy 700-7204-4901 100.00 10/29/2025 Water Wise Rebate- Clothes Washer
100.00 10/29/2025
Larson Cathy 100.00
Lawson Products, Inc.700-0000-4120 262.32 10/29/2025 Pins/Bolts
Lawson Products, Inc.101-1550-4120 262.32 10/29/2025 Pins/Bolts
Lawson Products, Inc.101-1320-4120 262.32 10/29/2025 Pins/Bolts
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 17 of 31
61
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
786.96 10/29/2025
Lawson Products, Inc. 786.96
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 101-1120-4370 50.00 10/29/2025 APMP Conference - M Unmacht
50.00 10/29/2025
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 50.00
LEPAGE JASON & LI 700-0000-2020 1.39 10/22/2025 Refund Check 099420-000, 1610 WEST 63RD STREET
LEPAGE JASON & LI 701-0000-2020 31.21 10/22/2025 Refund Check 099420-000, 1610 WEST 63RD STREET
LEPAGE JASON & LI 700-0000-2020 23.13 10/22/2025 Refund Check 099420-000, 1610 WEST 63RD STREET
LEPAGE JASON & LI 720-0000-2020 19.66 10/22/2025 Refund Check 099420-000, 1610 WEST 63RD STREET
75.39 10/22/2025
LEPAGE JASON & LI 75.39
Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P 101-1110-4312 3,333.33 10/22/2025 Lobbying expenses-October 2025
3,333.33 10/22/2025
Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P 3,333.33
LoScalzo Michael 700-7204-4901 50.00 10/29/2025 Water Wise Rebate-Irrigation Controller
50.00 10/29/2025
LoScalzo Michael 50.00
Macqueen Emergency Group 201-0000-4705 1,917.28 10/22/2025 2 ice rescue suits
1,917.28 10/22/2025
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 18 of 31
62
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Macqueen Emergency Group 1,917.28
Marco Inc 101-1160-4411 735.00 10/22/2025 Copier Lease
735.00 10/22/2025
Marco Inc 735.00
MCDEVITT TY & CLAIRE 700-0000-2020 73.89 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102349-000, 8525 MISSION HILLS LANE
73.89 10/22/2025
MCDEVITT TY & CLAIRE 73.89
MEIER GRETCHEN & JOSEPH 720-0000-2020 2.64 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102595-000, 8945 SOUTHWEST VILLAGE LOOP
MEIER GRETCHEN & JOSEPH 700-0000-2020 15.81 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102595-000, 8945 SOUTHWEST VILLAGE LOOP
MEIER GRETCHEN & JOSEPH 701-0000-2020 27.98 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102595-000, 8945 SOUTHWEST VILLAGE LOOP
MEIER GRETCHEN & JOSEPH 700-0000-2020 0.97 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102595-000, 8945 SOUTHWEST VILLAGE LOOP
47.40 10/22/2025
MEIER GRETCHEN & JOSEPH 47.40
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4260 74.96 10/22/2025 Blades Dusting Brush Car Nozzel
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4510 18.98 10/22/2025 Rib Anc Blu Lexel Clear Caulk
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 700-7019-4120 24.27 10/22/2025 Adapter Tube Braid
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 700-7043-4120 5.18 10/22/2025 Tarp Strap Rubber 19""
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4120 46.55 10/22/2025 Roller wht Dove Wire Cup Coarse Tote
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4150 78.96 10/22/2025 Stain & Sealter Paint Care Gallon Fee Adhs
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4151 7.59 10/22/2025 Primer PVC
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1320-4240 251.98 10/22/2025 Apron Chaps Wrap Chaps
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1220-4144 39.75 10/22/2025 Grade Stake
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 700-0000-4150 73.56 10/22/2025 Tube Poly Maibox Roughneck Blk Bee & Wasp Killer
621.78 10/22/2025
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 621.78
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 19 of 31
63
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Mesenbrink Construction and Engineering Inc 101-0000-2021 -125.76 10/22/2025 Sales Tax
Mesenbrink Construction and Engineering Inc 101-0000-2076 3,500.00 10/22/2025 Meter Deposit Refund
Mesenbrink Construction and Engineering Inc 700-0000-3666 -1,416.96 10/22/2025 Bulk Water
1,957.28 10/22/2025
Mesenbrink Construction and Engineering Inc 1,957.28
Metro Garage Door Company 101-1220-4510 605.00 10/29/2025 over head door repairs
Metro Garage Door Company 101-1220-4510 3,032.97 10/29/2025 remove & replace door opener
3,637.97 10/29/2025
Metro Garage Door Company 3,637.97
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 700-0000-2036 131.14 10/29/2025 2025 Unclaimed Property
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 701-0000-2036 127.25 10/29/2025 2025 Unclaimed Property
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 101-0000-2036 1,009.86 10/29/2025 2025 Unclaimed Property
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 720-0000-2036 34.02 10/29/2025 2025 Unclaimed Property
1,302.27 10/29/2025
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 1,302.27
Minnesota Valley Landscape Inc 601-6051-4300 650.20 10/22/2025 Replace Apple Tree from Trail
Minnesota Valley Landscape Inc 101-1310-4359 10.00 10/22/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425
660.20 10/22/2025
Minnesota Valley Landscape Inc 660.20
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 260.45 10/22/2025 Electric Charges
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 121.97 10/22/2025 Electric Charges
382.42 10/22/2025
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 47.65 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 147.58 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 20 of 31
64
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
195.23 10/29/2025
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 577.65
MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 101-1550-4120 23.88 10/22/2025 mower parts
MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 101-1550-4120 20.21 10/22/2025 thermostat / ball joint
MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 101-1550-4120 95.34 10/22/2025 mower part
139.43 10/22/2025
MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 139.43
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1250-4140 36.99 10/22/2025 transmission filter
36.99 10/22/2025
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1320-4120 33.98 10/29/2025 brake fitting
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1320-4120 65.00 10/29/2025 filters / bulbs
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1320-4120 -20.41 10/29/2025 filters
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1550-4120 35.17 10/29/2025 bearing
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1550-4120 109.94 10/29/2025 bearing / flange
223.68 10/29/2025
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 260.67
North American Safety, Inc.700-0000-4240 296.94 10/29/2025 safety vest
North American Safety, Inc.701-0000-4240 296.94 10/29/2025 safety vest
593.88 10/29/2025
North American Safety, Inc. 593.88
NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 601-6048-4751 540,986.10 10/22/2025 PMP
NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 701-6048-4751 54,720.48 10/22/2025 Sanitary
NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 700-6048-4751 8,708.79 10/22/2025 Water
NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 720-6048-4751 21,047.58 10/22/2025 Storm
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 21 of 31
65
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
625,462.95 10/22/2025
NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 625,462.95
Olson Thomas 402-1316-4702 32,000.00 10/29/2025 replacement salt dome cover
32,000.00 10/29/2025
Olson Thomas 32,000.00
Panera LLC 101-0000-2076 7,100.00 10/29/2025 Security Escrow- 531 West 79th Street - #376666
7,100.00 10/29/2025
Panera LLC 7,100.00
PAPEDIS; TRUSTEE OF THE OJARS OJARS 701-0000-2020 1.10 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018535-000, 2101 PINEHURST DRIVE
PAPEDIS; TRUSTEE OF THE OJARS OJARS 720-0000-2020 13.67 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018535-000, 2101 PINEHURST DRIVE
PAPEDIS; TRUSTEE OF THE OJARS OJARS 700-0000-2020 0.97 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018535-000, 2101 PINEHURST DRIVE
PAPEDIS; TRUSTEE OF THE OJARS OJARS 700-0000-2020 67.11 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018535-000, 2101 PINEHURST DRIVE
82.85 10/22/2025
PAPEDIS; TRUSTEE OF THE OJARS OJARS 82.85
PAULSON TYLER 700-0000-2020 18.86 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103636-000, 95 OLYMPIC CIRCLE
PAULSON TYLER 700-0000-2020 1.74 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103636-000, 95 OLYMPIC CIRCLE
PAULSON TYLER 701-0000-2020 32.73 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103636-000, 95 OLYMPIC CIRCLE
PAULSON TYLER 720-0000-2020 24.52 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103636-000, 95 OLYMPIC CIRCLE
77.85 10/22/2025
PAULSON TYLER 77.85
Pinnacle Pest Control 700-0000-4510 290.00 10/22/2025 pest control
Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1550-4510 160.00 10/22/2025 pest control
Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1530-4510 80.00 10/22/2025 pest control
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 22 of 31
66
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1170-4510 200.00 10/22/2025 pest control
730.00 10/22/2025
Pinnacle Pest Control 730.00
POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 700-0000-4140 684.20 10/29/2025 tires
684.20 10/29/2025
POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 684.20
PRESTIGE POOLS 101-0000-2073 1,000.00 10/22/2025 Erosion escrow 6681 Galpin Blvd #620048
1,000.00 10/22/2025
PRESTIGE POOLS 1,000.00
Pro-Tree Outdoor Services 101-1425-4572 1,320.00 10/22/2025 Tree Removal ROW hazard trees
1,320.00 10/22/2025
Pro-Tree Outdoor Services 1,320.00
Rademacher Daniel 720-7207-4150 190.00 10/29/2025 removal of beaver in pond
190.00 10/29/2025
Rademacher Daniel 190.00
Reeves Ross 700-7204-4901 100.00 10/29/2025 Water WIse Rebate- Clothes Washer
100.00 10/29/2025
Reeves Ross 100.00
Remington Timothy 601-6053-4751 541.50 10/29/2025 Driveway Reimbursement
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 23 of 31
67
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
541.50 10/29/2025
Remington Timothy 541.50
RESULTS TITLE 700-0000-2020 5.79 10/22/2025 Refund Check 008724-000, 7474 MOCCASIN TRAIL
RESULTS TITLE 700-0000-2020 0.61 10/22/2025 Refund Check 008724-000, 7474 MOCCASIN TRAIL
RESULTS TITLE 701-0000-2020 4.87 10/22/2025 Refund Check 008724-000, 7474 MOCCASIN TRAIL
RESULTS TITLE 720-0000-2020 8.60 10/22/2025 Refund Check 008724-000, 7474 MOCCASIN TRAIL
19.87 10/22/2025
RESULTS TITLE 19.87
ROADKILL ANIMAL CONTROL 101-1320-4300 129.00 10/22/2025 roadkill animal
129.00 10/22/2025
ROADKILL ANIMAL CONTROL 129.00
Ryan Contracting Company 700-6053-4751 362,118.77 10/29/2025 Water-2025 Pavement Rehab
Ryan Contracting Company 601-6053-4751 865,602.95 10/29/2025 PMP-2025 Pavement Rehab
Ryan Contracting Company 720-6053-4751 276,992.92 10/29/2025 Storm-2025 Pavement Rehab
Ryan Contracting Company 701-6053-4751 156,953.15 10/29/2025 Sanitary-2025 Pavement Rehab
1,661,667.79 10/29/2025
Ryan Contracting Company 1,661,667.79
Sazdoff Karen 700-7204-4901 50.00 10/29/2025 Water Wise Rebate- Toilet
50.00 10/29/2025
Sazdoff Karen 50.00
SEH 410-4410-4300 1,744.57 10/29/2025 Lake Ann Park Preserve
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 24 of 31
68
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
1,744.57 10/29/2025
SEH 1,744.57
Shaik Rahamthunnisa 101-1110-4375 165.00 10/22/2025 Nov. 1 open house balloon artist
165.00 10/22/2025
Shaik Rahamthunnisa 165.00
SHREVE DANIEL S.700-0000-2020 3.51 10/22/2025 Refund Check 017782-000, 7595 WALNUT CURVE
SHREVE DANIEL S.701-0000-2020 37.54 10/22/2025 Refund Check 017782-000, 7595 WALNUT CURVE
SHREVE DANIEL S.720-0000-2020 49.53 10/22/2025 Refund Check 017782-000, 7595 WALNUT CURVE
SHREVE DANIEL S.700-0000-2020 20.06 10/22/2025 Refund Check 017782-000, 7595 WALNUT CURVE
110.64 10/22/2025
SHREVE DANIEL S. 110.64
Siegel-Carlson Alexis 701-7060-4901 8,910.00 10/22/2025 PPII Grant Program Reimburse for 411 Highland Dr
8,910.00 10/22/2025
Siegel-Carlson Alexis 8,910.00
Silva Screenprinting & Dist, LLC 101-1520-4130 98.11 10/22/2025 City Council sweatshirts
98.11 10/22/2025
Silva Screenprinting & Dist, LLC 98.11
SM HENTGES & SONS 700-6040-4751 15,314.58 10/29/2025 Water- City @100%
SM HENTGES & SONS 601-6140-4751 684,279.82 10/29/2025 County @ 75%
SM HENTGES & SONS 701-6040-4751 1,140.01 10/29/2025 Sanitary- City @ 100%
SM HENTGES & SONS 601-6040-4751 228,093.27 10/29/2025 City @ 25%
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 25 of 31
69
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
928,827.68 10/29/2025
SM HENTGES & SONS 928,827.68
SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 101-1370-4260 16.62 10/29/2025 screw driver
16.62 10/29/2025
SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 16.62
Southwest Rental & Sales 101-1320-4410 119.35 10/29/2025 skid loader auger and auger attachment
119.35 10/29/2025
Southwest Rental & Sales 119.35
SPILANE MATTHEW 700-0000-2020 3.44 10/22/2025 Refund Check 099525-000, 509 DEL RIO DRIVE
SPILANE MATTHEW 701-0000-2020 6.75 10/22/2025 Refund Check 099525-000, 509 DEL RIO DRIVE
SPILANE MATTHEW 700-0000-2020 0.65 10/22/2025 Refund Check 099525-000, 509 DEL RIO DRIVE
SPILANE MATTHEW 720-0000-2020 9.25 10/22/2025 Refund Check 099525-000, 509 DEL RIO DRIVE
20.09 10/22/2025
SPILANE MATTHEW 20.09
SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 601-6058-4303 254.56 10/22/2025 TH41/MMSW
254.56 10/22/2025
SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 254.56
Stericycle, Inc 101-1120-4300 229.00 10/22/2025 Shredding Bin Swap
229.00 10/22/2025
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 26 of 31
70
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
Stericycle, Inc 229.00
STEWART TITLE COMPANY 700-0000-2020 0.99 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102104-000, 721 CONESTOGA TRAIL
STEWART TITLE COMPANY 700-0000-2020 19.15 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102104-000, 721 CONESTOGA TRAIL
STEWART TITLE COMPANY 701-0000-2020 34.48 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102104-000, 721 CONESTOGA TRAIL
STEWART TITLE COMPANY 720-0000-2020 13.94 10/22/2025 Refund Check 102104-000, 721 CONESTOGA TRAIL
68.56 10/22/2025
STEWART TITLE COMPANY 68.56
STONE ARCH TITLE LLC 720-0000-2020 13.78 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103305-000, 7154 ALPHABET STREET
STONE ARCH TITLE LLC 700-0000-2020 0.97 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103305-000, 7154 ALPHABET STREET
STONE ARCH TITLE LLC 701-0000-2020 10.31 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103305-000, 7154 ALPHABET STREET
STONE ARCH TITLE LLC 700-0000-2020 23.38 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103305-000, 7154 ALPHABET STREET
48.44 10/22/2025
STONE ARCH TITLE LLC 48.44
StreetLight Data, Inc 101-1310-4229 6,751.00 10/22/2025 StreetLight Insight Subscription
6,751.00 10/22/2025
StreetLight Data, Inc 6,751.00
SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION 101-1220-4510 623.00 10/29/2025 fire alarm monitoring 2025-26
623.00 10/29/2025
SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION 623.00
THE TITLE GROUP INC 720-0000-2020 32.90 10/22/2025 Refund Check 096966-000, 1748 VALLEY RIDGE PL
THE TITLE GROUP INC 701-0000-2020 37.83 10/22/2025 Refund Check 096966-000, 1748 VALLEY RIDGE PL
THE TITLE GROUP INC 700-0000-2020 28.78 10/22/2025 Refund Check 096966-000, 1748 VALLEY RIDGE PL
THE TITLE GROUP INC 700-0000-2020 2.33 10/22/2025 Refund Check 096966-000, 1748 VALLEY RIDGE PL
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 27 of 31
71
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
101.84 10/22/2025
THE TITLE GROUP INC 101.84
TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 720-0000-2020 16.58 10/22/2025 Refund Check 104046-000, 910 PENAMINT COURT
TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 700-0000-2020 20.20 10/22/2025 Refund Check 104046-000, 910 PENAMINT COURT
TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 700-0000-2020 1.18 10/22/2025 Refund Check 104046-000, 910 PENAMINT COURT
TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 701-0000-2020 39.70 10/22/2025 Refund Check 104046-000, 910 PENAMINT COURT
TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 701-0000-2020 15.37 10/22/2025 Refund Check 098332-000, 2771 CENTURY CIRCLE
TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 700-0000-2020 1.11 10/22/2025 Refund Check 098332-000, 2771 CENTURY CIRCLE
TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 700-0000-2020 10.31 10/22/2025 Refund Check 098332-000, 2771 CENTURY CIRCLE
TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 720-0000-2020 2.04 10/22/2025 Refund Check 098332-000, 2771 CENTURY CIRCLE
106.49 10/22/2025
TITLE SPECIALISTS INC 106.49
TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 700-0000-2020 0.51 10/22/2025 Refund Check 095662-000, 512 WEST 76TH STREET
TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 701-0000-2020 10.07 10/22/2025 Refund Check 095662-000, 512 WEST 76TH STREET
TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 700-0000-2020 8.57 10/22/2025 Refund Check 095662-000, 512 WEST 76TH STREET
TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 720-0000-2020 7.21 10/22/2025 Refund Check 095662-000, 512 WEST 76TH STREET
26.36 10/22/2025
TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 26.36
TROWBRIDGE ANA & ANTHONY 700-0000-2020 1.15 10/22/2025 Refund Check 098305-000, 6976 PIMA LANE
TROWBRIDGE ANA & ANTHONY 700-0000-2020 8.19 10/22/2025 Refund Check 098305-000, 6976 PIMA LANE
TROWBRIDGE ANA & ANTHONY 701-0000-2020 16.07 10/22/2025 Refund Check 098305-000, 6976 PIMA LANE
TROWBRIDGE ANA & ANTHONY 720-0000-2020 7.71 10/22/2025 Refund Check 098305-000, 6976 PIMA LANE
33.12 10/22/2025
TROWBRIDGE ANA & ANTHONY 33.12
Twin Cities Transport & Recovery, Inc 101-1220-4370 150.00 10/29/2025 car for fire training
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 28 of 31
72
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
150.00 10/29/2025
Twin Cities Transport & Recovery, Inc 150.00
VALLEY-RICH CO INC 700-0000-4550 1,140.00 10/22/2025 repair operating nut
VALLEY-RICH CO INC 700-0000-4550 820.00 10/22/2025 repair operating nut
1,960.00 10/22/2025
VALLEY-RICH CO INC 1,960.00
VERIZON WIRELESS 700-0000-4310 95.08 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges
VERIZON WIRELESS 701-0000-4310 95.08 10/29/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges
190.16 10/29/2025
VERIZON WIRELESS 190.16
WAKEFIELD AMY & ADAM 720-0000-2020 4.26 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018722-000, 6451 DEVONSHIRE DRIVE
WAKEFIELD AMY & ADAM 700-0000-2020 0.30 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018722-000, 6451 DEVONSHIRE DRIVE
WAKEFIELD AMY & ADAM 701-0000-2020 75.66 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018722-000, 6451 DEVONSHIRE DRIVE
WAKEFIELD AMY & ADAM 700-0000-2020 32.30 10/22/2025 Refund Check 018722-000, 6451 DEVONSHIRE DRIVE
112.52 10/22/2025
WAKEFIELD AMY & ADAM 112.52
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 700-0000-2020 4.31 10/22/2025 Refund Check 005692-000, 861 LAKE SUSAN DRIVE
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 700-0000-2020 0.51 10/22/2025 Refund Check 005692-000, 861 LAKE SUSAN DRIVE
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 701-0000-2020 7.63 10/22/2025 Refund Check 005692-000, 861 LAKE SUSAN DRIVE
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 720-0000-2020 7.24 10/22/2025 Refund Check 005692-000, 861 LAKE SUSAN DRIVE
19.69 10/22/2025
WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 19.69
WEST TITLE LLC 700-0000-2020 0.71 10/22/2025 Refund Check 101371-000, 8716 NORTH BAY DRIVE
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 29 of 31
73
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
WEST TITLE LLC 700-0000-2020 3.15 10/22/2025 Refund Check 101371-000, 8716 NORTH BAY DRIVE
WEST TITLE LLC 701-0000-2020 0.66 10/22/2025 Refund Check 101371-000, 8716 NORTH BAY DRIVE
WEST TITLE LLC 720-0000-2020 3.86 10/22/2025 Refund Check 101371-000, 8716 NORTH BAY DRIVE
8.38 10/22/2025
WEST TITLE LLC 8.38
WINKEL CONRAD A.700-0000-2020 21.19 10/22/2025 Refund Check 007134-000, 505 HIGHLAND DRIVE
WINKEL CONRAD A.720-0000-2020 21.11 10/22/2025 Refund Check 007134-000, 505 HIGHLAND DRIVE
WINKEL CONRAD A.700-0000-2020 1.50 10/22/2025 Refund Check 007134-000, 505 HIGHLAND DRIVE
WINKEL CONRAD A.701-0000-2020 28.19 10/22/2025 Refund Check 007134-000, 505 HIGHLAND DRIVE
71.99 10/22/2025
WINKEL CONRAD A. 71.99
WONG ALBERT 700-0000-2020 6.76 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103476-000, 2177 PAISLEY PATH
WONG ALBERT 701-0000-2020 10.34 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103476-000, 2177 PAISLEY PATH
WONG ALBERT 700-0000-2020 0.90 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103476-000, 2177 PAISLEY PATH
WONG ALBERT 720-0000-2020 12.70 10/22/2025 Refund Check 103476-000, 2177 PAISLEY PATH
30.70 10/22/2025
WONG ALBERT 30.70
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 601-6140-4300 31,032.51 10/29/2025 County @ 75%
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 601-6040-4300 10,344.17 10/29/2025 City @ 25%
41,376.68 10/29/2025
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 41,376.68
XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 2,967.09 10/22/2025 Electric Charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 700-7043-4320 2,649.77 10/22/2025 Electric Charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 9,352.13 10/22/2025 Electric Charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1600-4320 21.58 10/22/2025 Electric Charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 100.05 10/22/2025 Electric Charges
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 30 of 31
74
Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description
15,090.62 10/22/2025
XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1600-4320 431.70 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1220-4320 1,020.92 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 99.84 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1170-4320 6,762.24 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1312-4320 798.75 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1540-4320 840.09 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 24,523.89 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1550-4320 -274.53 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 701-0000-4320 99.84 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1120-1193 64.60 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1190-4320 508.20 10/29/2025 Electric Charges
34,875.54 10/29/2025
XCEL ENERGY INC 49,966.16
Zillmer Tree Management LLC 601-6040-4300 4,165.50 10/29/2025 City @ 25%
Zillmer Tree Management LLC 601-6060-4300 1,475.00 10/29/2025 PMP @ 59%
Zillmer Tree Management LLC 701-6060-4300 200.00 10/29/2025 Sanitary @ 8%
Zillmer Tree Management LLC 720-6060-4300 550.00 10/29/2025 Storm @ 22%
Zillmer Tree Management LLC 700-6060-4300 275.00 10/29/2025 Water @ 11%
Zillmer Tree Management LLC 601-6140-4300 12,496.50 10/29/2025 County @ 75%
19,162.00 10/29/2025
Zillmer Tree Management LLC 19,162.00
4,227,277.53
AP - Check Detail (10/31/2025)Page 31 of 31
75
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item 2025 Well Rehabilitation Project
File No.ENG 25-11 Item No: D.7
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council approves a contract with Keys Well Drilling Company for the 2025
Well Rehabilitation project."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Asset Management
SUMMARY
The city typically rehabilitates one or more of its 12 public water supply wells annually.
This project includes rehabilitation of Well Numbers 8 & 12.
BACKGROUND
Routine maintenance of a well is recommended every 8-10 years to keep it reliable and to reach its
useful service life.
Well #8 was constructed in 1999 and last rehabilitated in 2017.
Well #11 was constructed in 2006 but has never been rehabilitated because it went dry in 2009. It was
never formally abandoned. It is a fairly shallow well, comparatively speaking, and it was thought to
have been drilled into an isolated and hydraulically unconnected portion of the aquifer. After
76
completing an aquifer recharge study, it was determined that it in fact, is connected to the larger aquifer
system and just has very limited pumping capacity. The well has been used in recent years with good
success, albeit being used sparingly. It makes sense to keep the well active, and therefore a
rehabilitation effort makes sense at this time.
DISCUSSION
The City's standard construction contract is being utilized as the basis of the contract.
BUDGET
The consultant sent the project to four reputable well drillers, and three of them returned quotes as
summarized below:
Keys Bergerson Traut
Well 8 $ 68,370.00 $ 81,690.00 $ 124,355.00
Well 11 $ 56,020.00 $ 66,031.00 $ 114,705.00
TOTAL $ 124,390.00 $ 147,721.00 $ 239,060.00
Annual well rehabilitation projects are included in the 5-yr Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) as project
W-032. The budget for 2025 is $140,000.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the consultant recommend approving the well rehabilitation contract to Keys Well Drilling
Company.
ATTACHMENTS
Award recommendation letter Wells 8 & 11
CIP W-032
Water Supply Overview Map
Contractor Verification
77
barr.com
P:\Mpls\23 MN\10\23101051 Chanhassen Well 8 and 11 Rehab\WorkFiles\Bidding\Received Bids\Award recommendation letter
Wells 8 & 11_FINAL.docxAward recommendation letter Wells 8 & 11_FINAL.docx
November 3, 2025
Charles Howley
City of Chanhassen
Public Works Director/City Engineer
7700 Market Boulevard
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Re: City of Chanhassen Rehabilitation of Wells #8 and #11
Dear Mr. Howley:
The purpose of this letter is to recommend award of the contract for the City of Chanhassen Well
Rehabilitation Projects for Wells #8 and #11, City Project No. 25-11. The work performed under this
contract will be standard maintenance and rehabilitation of City Wells #8 and #11.
A request for quotes was sent to four contractors on October 15th, 2025: Traut Companies, Keys Well
Drilling Company, Bergeson-Caswell Inc. and EH Renner & Sons Inc. Three quotes were received by the
October 30th, 2025 deadline, including quotes from: Traut Companies, Bergeson-Caswell Inc., and Keys
Well Drilling Company. A summary of the quotes is provided in the table below.
Wells 8 & 11 Rehabilitation Quote Comparison
Keys Well Drilling
Company
Bergeson-Caswell
Inc.
Traut
Companies
Well 8 Base bid $ 68,370.00 $ 81,690.00 $ 124,355.00
Well 11 Base bid $ 56,020.00 $ 66,031.00 $ 114,705.00
Total Base Bids $ 124,390.00 $ 147,721.00 $ 239,060.00
Barr Engineering recommends the Well Rehabilitation Project Wells #8 and #11 be awarded to Keys Well
Drilling Company for a total contract of $124,390. Keys has performed well rehabilitation services for the
city in the past and have performed satisfactorily.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to reach out.
Sincerely,
Brian LeMon, P.E.
78
Water - Annual Well Rehabilitation
Overview
Request Owner Charlie Howley, PW Director/City Engineer
Department Water General Operations
Form Type Capital Improvement
Request Type Water, Sewer, and Surface Water Improvements
Project Number W-032
Description
This program annually inspects and performs regular maintenance of the City's wells. Wells are recommended to be serviced every 8
years. The schedule of rehabilitation is:
2025 - Wells #8 & #11
2026 - Wells #7 & #13
2027 - Well #14
2028 - Well #9
2029 - Well #3
2030 - Well #4
2031 - Well #2 & #15
2032 - Well #10
2033 - Well #12
2034 - Wells #8 & #11
Performing regular maintenance will extend the life of well components, reduce emergency calls, and have a more reliable water supply
system.
Details
Type of Project Improvement
79
Capital Cost Breakdown
Capital Cost FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032
Construction/Maintenance $140,000 $180,000 $95,000 $95,000 $100,000 $100,000 $239,000 $107,000
Total $140,000 $180,000 $95,000 $95,000 $100,000 $100,000 $239,000 $107,000
Capital Cost
FY2025 Budget
$140,000
Total Budget (all years)
$1.409M
Project Total
$1.409M
Capital Cost by Year
Construction/Maintenance
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
$140,000.00
$180,000.00
$95,000.00
$95,000.00
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
$239,000.00
$107,000.00
$192,000.00
$161,000.00
$0 $60K $120K $180K
Capital Cost for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $1,409,000.00
Construction/Maintenance (100%)$1,409,000
80
Funding Sources Breakdown
Funding
Sources FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY20
Utility
Fund -
Water
$140,000 $180,000 $95,000 $95,000 $100,000 $100,000 $239,000 $107,000 $192,000 $161,0
Total $140,000 $180,000 $95,000 $95,000 $100,000 $100,000 $239,000 $107,000 $192,000 $161,0
Funding Sources
FY2025 Budget
$140,000
Total Budget (all years)
$1.409M
Project Total
$1.409M
Funding Sources by Year
Utility Fund - Water
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
$140,000.00
$180,000.00
$95,000.00
$95,000.00
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
$239,000.00
$107,000.00
$192,000.00
$161,000.00
$0 $60K $120K $180K
Funding Sources for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $1,409,000.00
Utility Fund - Water (100%)$1,409,000.00
81
82
83
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item Approve Permanent Stormwater Ownership and Maintenance Agreement for
Avienda Apartments
File No.Item No: D.8
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Eric Maass, Community Development Director
Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council approves the attached Permanent Stormwater Ownership and
Maintenance Agreement for Avienda Apartments with minor modifications as may be approved by
the City Attorney."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Development & Redevelopment
SUMMARY
The attached stormwater agreement establishes ownership and maintenance responsibilities related to
permanent stormwater facilities proposed to be constructed on Lot 1 Block 1 Avienda Apartments,
which is the property where the apartment project will be constructed. This agreement does not pertain
to the future Avienda regional stormwater pond. This is a standard agreement required of the city for
long-term ownership and maintenance of private stormwater infrastructure. Final exhibits will be
attached to this agreement prior to it being recorded against the property.
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
84
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
Stormwater Maintenance Agreements Avienda Apartments
85
1
237658v3237658v2
STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE FACILITIES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the ______ day of _____________,
2025, by and between AVIENDA APARTMENTS OWNER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (the “Owner”) and the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation
(the “City”).
RECITALS
A. The Owner is the owner of certain real property located in Carver County,
Minnesota legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Avienda Apartments, Carver County, Minnesota
(“Property”); and
B. The Owner is proceeding to develop the Property; and
C. The final plans for the Avienda Apartments final plat, (“Plans”), which are
expressly made a part hereof, as approved or to be approved by the City, provides for
detention/retention of stormwater within the confines of the Property; and
D. The City and the Owner agree that the health, safety, and welfare of the residents
of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, require that on-site stormwater management/BMP facilities
be constructed and maintained on the Property; and
E. The City requires that on-site stormwater management/BMP facilities
(“Stormwater Facilities”) as shown on the Plans be constructed and adequately maintained by the
Owner as a condition of final plat approval; and
86
2
237658v3237658v2
F. The Owner is required to enter into this Agreement as a condition of the Site Plan
Agreement and grant to the City a license to enter the Property to inspect and, if necessary, complete
work required under the terms of this Agreement.
G. The parties acknowledge that the Owner intends to assign this Agreement to a
homeowner’s association that will be formed to acquire the common elements, including but not
limited to the Stormwater Facilities, and manage the common interest community.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants of the parties set forth herein
and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties agree as follows:
1. Construction of Stormwater Improvements. Owner shall construct the
Stormwater Facilities in accordance with the plans and specifications identified in the Plans or
pursuant to any modification of the Plans approved by the City during construction of the
Stormwater Facilities as provided in Exhibit A. The Owner shall submit to the City any updates
with “as built” for the Stormwater Facilities within 1 year of installation. If Plan modification
substantially changes the size, location, or operations and maintenance of the stormwater facility
the owner shall provide updated Exhibits to the City.
2. Maintenance of Stormwater Improvements.
A. The owner of the Stormwater Facilities from time-to-time, including but not limited
to, Owner and its successors and assigns (collectively, but each only during their period of
ownership, the “Responsible Party”) shall adequately maintain the Stormwater Facilities in
accordance with the Stormwater Maintenance Plan and the City engineering standards for
stormwater treatment facilities attached hereto as Exhibit B. This includes all pipes, channels, and
other conveyances built to convey stormwater to the facility, as well as all structures,
improvements, and vegetation provided to control the quantity and quality of the stormwater.
Adequate maintenance is herein defined as good working condition so that these facilities are
performing their design functions.
B. The Owner will perform the work necessary to keep these Stormwater Facilities in
good working order as appropriate. In the event a maintenance schedule for the Stormwater
Facilities (including sediment removal) is outlined in Exhibit B, schedule will be followed and
comply with all federal, state, and local regulations relating to the disposal of material.
3. Inspection and Reporting. The Responsible Party shall cause the Stormwater
Facilities to be inspected and submit an inspection report annually and shall be responsible for the
payment of any associated costs. The purpose of the inspection is to assure safe and proper
functioning of the facilities. The inspection shall cover the entire facilities, berms, outlet structure,
pond areas, access roads, buffers, etc. Deficiencies shall be noted in the inspection report. A
storage treatment basin will be considered inadequate if it is not compliant with all requirements
of the approved Plan and City engineering standards set forth in Exhibit B.
87
3
237658v3237658v2
4. Operator as Responsible Party. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to
the contrary, the City acknowledges and agrees that the Owner’s maintenance, inspection, and
reporting obligations with respect to the Stormwater Facilities may be delegated to the “Operator”
under that certain Avienda Declaration of Reciprocal Easements and Operating Agreement dated
as of December 29, 2022, and recorded in the Office of the Count y Recorder in and for Carver
County, Minnesota on December 29, 2022 as Document No. A756037, as amended by that certain
First Amendment to Avienda Declaration of Reciprocal Easements and Operating Agreement
dated May 21, 2025, and recorded in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Carver County,
Minnesota on May 22, 2025 as Document No. A786585, as further amended by that certain Second
Amendment to Avienda Declaration of Reciprocal Easements and Operating Agreement dated
September 4, 2025, and recorded in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Carver County,
Minnesota on September 5, 2025 as Document No. A790584, and as further amended by that
certain Third Amendment to Avienda Declaration of Reciprocal Easements and Operating
Agreement dated October 24, 2025 and recorded in the Office of the County Recorder in and for
Carver County, Minnesota on October 27, 2025 as Document No. A792655 (collectively, the
“Declaration”), and that the Operator’s maintenance, inspection, and reporting of the Stormwater
Facilities pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Declaration shall be deemed to discharge the
Responsible Party’s maintenance, inspection, and reporting obligations with respect to the
Stormwater Facilities hereunder provided that such maintenance, inspecting, and reporting by the
Operator satisfies the maintenance, inspection, and reporting standards and requirements set forth
herein.
5. City Access and Maintenance Rights.
A. The Owner hereby grants permission to the City, its authorized agents and
employees, to enter upon the Property and to inspect the stormwater management/BMP facilities
whenever the City deems necessary. The City shall provide the Responsible Party, its successors
and assigns, copies of the inspection findings and a directive to commence with the repairs if
necessary (“Inspection Report”).
B. In the event the Responsible Party, its successors and assigns, fails to maintain the
Stormwater Facilities in good working condition acceptable to the City, and such failure continues
for 60 days after the City gives the Responsible Party written notice of such failure, the City may
enter upon the Property and take whatever steps necessary, including excavation and the storage
of materials and equipment, to correct deficiencies identified in the Inspection Report. The City’s
notice shall specifically state which maintenance tasks are to be performed. The City may charge
the costs, including assessing the City’s costs to the Responsible Party’s property taxes, t o the
Responsible Party. This provision shall not be construed to allow the City to erect any structure of
permanent nature outside of the area of the Stormwater Facilities. It is expressly understood and
agreed that the City is under no obligation to routinely maintain or repair said Stormwater
Facilities, and in no event shall this Agreement be construed to impose any such obligation on the
City. In addition, Responsible Party agrees that it is, and will be, solely responsible to address
complaints and legal claims brought by any third party with regard to the maintenance and
operation and the consequences there from the Stormwater Facilities. The Responsible Party shall
defend and hold the City harmless from any such third-party claim, except to the extent of the
City’s or its agents’, contractors’ or employees’ negligence or willful misconduct.
88
4
237658v3237658v2
6. Reimbursement of Costs. The Responsible Party shall reimburse the City for all
costs incurred by the City in the enforcement of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, including
court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees.
7. Indemnification. This Agreement imposes no liability of any kind whatsoever on
the City. The Responsible Party shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officials,
employees, agents, contractors, and volunteers against any and all claims, demands, losses,
damages, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) arising out of or resulting from the
Responsible Party or the Responsible Party’s agents’ or employee’s negligent or intentional acts,
or any violation of any safety law, regulation or code in the performance of this Agreement,
without regard to any inspection or review made or not made by the City, its officials, employees,
agents, contractors, or volunteers, or failure by the City, its officials, employees, agents
contractors, or volunteers to take any other prudent precautions. In the event the City, upon the
failure of the Responsible Party to comply with any conditions of this Agreement, performs said
conditions pursuant to its authority in this Agreement, the Responsible Party shall indemnify and
hold harmless the City, its employees, agents and representatives from any cost, damage or harm,
except to the extent resulting from its or their own negligent acts in the performance of the
Responsible Party’s required work under this Agreement. Failure to perform any of the
Responsible Party’s required work shall not be considered negligence by the City, its employees,
agents or representatives.
8. Notice. All notices required under this Agreement shall either be personally
delivered or be sent by certified or registered mail and addressed as follows:
To the Owner: Avienda Apartments Owner, LLC
7803 Glenroy Road, Suite 200
Bloomington, MN 55439
Attn: Legal Department
To the City: City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
Attn: City Manager
All notices given hereunder shall be deemed given when personally delivered or two business days
after being placed in the mail properly addressed as provided herein.
9. Successors/Covenants Run with Property. All duties and obligations of Owner
under this Agreement shall also be duties and obligations of Owner’s successors and assigns. The
terms and conditions of this Agreement shall run with the Property.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
[Signature pages (2) follow]
89
5
237658v3237658v2
PROPERTY OWNER:
AVIENDA APARTMENTS OWNER, LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
By: Avienda Apartments Venture, LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
Its: Sole Member
By: IDP Avienda, LLC
a Minnesota limited liability company
Its: Managing Member
By: _________________________________
Print Name: Anne Behrendt
Its: Authorized Signer
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of November, 2025, by
Anne Behrendt, as Authorized Signer of IDP Avienda, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, as
Managing Member of Avienda Apartments Venture, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as
Sole Member of AVIENDA APARTMENTS OWNER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
on behalf of the entity.
Notary Public
90
6
237658v3237658v2
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
By:
Elise Ryan, Mayor
(SEAL)
And:
Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF CARVER )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________,
2025, by Elise Ryan and by Lauire Hokkanen, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City
of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the
authority granted by its City Council.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
Grand Oak Office Center I
860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (651) 452-5000
AMP/amt
91
7
237658v3237658v2
EXHIBIT A
TO
STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
STORMWATER BMP EXHIBIT
92
8
237658v3237658v2
EXHIBIT B
TO
STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
Stormwater Facility Operation and Maintenance Plan and Inspection Checklist
The Owner, shall be vested with and shall be responsible for conducting an annual inspection of the
stormwater facility as depicted in Exhibit B and attached hereto, utilizing the stormwater facility
maintenance inspection checklist, attached hereto, and shall make any repairs to the stormwater facility
necessary for its intended design and function, as determined by the City’s Water Resources Engineer
for the remaining life of the Stormwater Facility.
93
9
237658v3237658v2
94
10
237658v3237658v2
MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT
TO
STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK & TRUST, a North Dakota banking corporation, which
holds a mortgage executed by AVIENDA APARTMENTS OWNER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company, mortgagee, in favor of FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK & TRUST, a North Dakota
banking corporation, in the original principal amount of $85,000,000.00, dated October 24, 2025, filed
October 27, 2025 with the Office of the County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota, as Document No.
A792665, on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Stormwater
Maintenance Agreement, agrees that the Stormwater Maintenance Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage.
Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2025.
FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK & TRUST
By:
_________________________ [print name]
Its: ______________________ [title]
STATE OF )
)ss.
COUNTY OF __________ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _________________ day of
______________________________, 2025, by __________________________________________
the ________________________________________ of FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK &
TRUST, a North Dakota banking corporation, on behalf of said entity.
__________________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
Grand Oak Office Center I
860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
651-452-5000
AMP/amt
95
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item Dogwood Right-of-Way Vacation
File No.Vacation 25-01 Item No: D.9
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council approves tabling the Dogwood Road public Right-of-Way vacation
item originally presented at the October 13, 2025 City Council meeting to an unspecified future City
Council meeting once the applicable agreements between the property owners are completed."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Development & Redevelopment
SUMMARY
At the October 13, 2025 City Council meeting, the council tabled the item to November 10, 2025, but
there are a number of additional surveying, easement, and property transfer steps still needed to align
with the overall vacation process. The ask is to table indefinitely as the timing of completion is not
determined and somewhat out of the city's control. Once all of the documents and agreements are in
place, staff will bring the vacation request back to a future City Council meeting.
BACKGROUND
N/A
DISCUSSION
N/A
96
BUDGET
The property owner requesting the vacation is providing a cash escrow to the city to cover the survey
and legal expenses incurred by the city for the vacation.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends tabling the item.
ATTACHMENTS
97
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item Partial Release of Planned Unit Development Agreement (951 W 78th Street)
File No.Item No: D.10
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Eric Maass, Community Development Director
Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council approves the partial release of the Planned Unit Development
Agreement for property located at 951 W 78th Street."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Development & Redevelopment
SUMMARY
At the time of the development of the Target store in downtown Chanhassen, a Planned Unit
Development Agreement was established over those properties and the adjacent commercial sites
including the property located at 951 W 78th Street. Since that time, the property has had a new PUD
Zoning Ordinance adopted, so the resulting PUD Agreement functions solely to what we would today
refer to as a "Development Contract." Since all requirements of the development have been completed,
staff is recommending that the City Council authorize the partial release of the Planned Unit
Development Agreement for the property at 951 W 78th Street.
The property at 951 W 78th Street is the former location of the Chanhassen Brewery, and that property
has since been listed for sale. This action is an effort towards cleaning up the title work associated with
this property.
The release of development agreements or development contracts following completion and acceptance
of improvements by the city is considered typical; however, this is only completed upon request by a
98
private property owner.
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the partial release of the planned unit development agreement as
presented.
ATTACHMENTS
DOCS-#237673-v1-Partial Release of PUD
99
1
(reserved for recording information)
PARTIAL RELEASE OF
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
PARTIAL RELEASE OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
granted this ______ day of ________________, 2025, by the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a
Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”).
WHEREAS, the City and Dayton Hudson Corporation a Minnesota corporation, and B.C.
“Jim” Burdick and Brigitte Burdick, husband and wife, entered into a Planned Unit Development
Agreement, dated October 26, 1992 and recorded November 17, 1992 with the Office of the
County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota as Document No. 142323 (“PUD”); and
WHEREAS, the City has been requested to release and discharge the property legally
described on Exhibit A (“Property”) from the PUD;
WHEREAS, all requirements of the PUD have been met as to the Property and there is no
longer a need to have the PUD recorded against the Property.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota:
The Property is released and discharged from the PUD.
ADOPTED this _____ day of _______________, 2025.
[Remainder of the page is intentionally left blank.
Signature page is to follow.]
100
2
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
(Seal)
By ____________________________________
Elise Ryan, Mayor
By ____________________________________
Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF CARVER )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ____________,
2025, by Elise Ryan and Laurie Hokkanen, respectively the Mayor and the City Manager of the
City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and
pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council.
___________________________________
Notary Public
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON,
Professional Association
Grand Oak Office Center I
860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (651) 452-5000
AMP/amt
101
3
EXHIBIT A
Lot 1, Block 1, Chanhassen Retail Third Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver
County, Minnesota.
102
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item Approve SCALE Hardware and Software Purchase with Computer Integrated
Technologies (CIT)
File No.Item No: D.11
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Rick Rice, IT Manager
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council approves the purchase of SCALE hardware and software from
Computer Integrated Technologies."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Asset Management
SUMMARY
The proposed SCALE hardware and software solution consists of three physical network servers to be
located at City Hall and a single physical network server to be located at Public Works for disaster
recovery. These servers will host the SCALE Professional Essentials virtual hosting software. All
hardware and software are warranted for five years. This is a hyper-converge solution whereby all
storage is contained within the network servers, eliminating the need for an external storage array. The
proposal includes professional services from CIT for hardware and software installation, including the
migration of all existing virtual servers from the VMware to SCALE. Warranty support for both
hardware and software is provided directly from SCALE or through CIT who is a SCALE partner.
BACKGROUND
The city switched from utilizing individual physical network servers to the VMWare virtual server
103
environment in 2007. This allowed for a more cost-effective and efficient method of hosting the city's
file servers and system software applications. This system was expanded to include a disaster recovery
system which is located at the Public Works facility. There are currently 25 active virtual servers
running on the three VMware physical host servers. Physical storage for the VMware environment is
hosted on a 40-terabyte storage area network server. Our VMware software and support licenses have
been renewed annually. Physical servers and storage for the VMware environment are replaced every 5
years. The physical hardware had been planned for replacement this year.
DISCUSSION
Broadcom / VMware License Changes
VMware was purchased by Broadcom in November 2023. Broadcom changed its software licensing
models in 2024 and eliminated the vSphere Enterprise software version, which the city had been using
for our production servers. This required upgrading to their Foundation license, which represented a
66% cost increase from $4,319.00 to $7,149.44. Broadcom brought back the vSphere Enterprise license
model in 2025, but did not allow license downgrades. The renewal for the Foundation license in 2025
increased by another 75%, from $7,149.44 to $12,544. The city disaster recovery server located at
Public Works runs VMware Standard perpetual license. Broadcom eliminated this version as an offering
in July of this year. This license is up for renewal this month. We are currently waiting for our
Broadcom reseller to see what options we have and the associated costs.
Broadcom / VMware Support Changes
Broadcom has also made changes to VMware software support. Direct software support is now only
available for their Cloud Foundation customers. All other customers are required to go through Partner
distributers which was reduced in number from 18,000 to 300. Our primary network support vendor is
no longer on the partner list.
BUDGET
The city budgeted $9,568 for VMWare in 2025 and set aside $165,000 in fund balance at the end of
2024 for new City Hall hardware and software in connection with the move. This quote includes
equipment plus a five-year license and software agreement. The total for the five-year license and
software is $37,850 and this will be allocated over the five-year term of the agreement.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the purchase of the five-year SCALE Hardware,
Software, and Implementation contract at a cost of $144,086.01.
ATTACHMENTS
SCALE Quote - CIT.pdf
SCALE Quote - Scale Computing.pdf
104
SCALE Production Cluster and DR Node
Date: 9/25/2025
Prepared For:
City Of Chanhassen Commercial
Attn Finance Dept
Chanhassen, MN 55317
rrice@chanhassenmn.gov
952.227.1111
Prepared By:
CIT
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
https://www.citsolutions.net
105
Executive Summary
Virtualization Infrastructure Migration to Scale Computing
The City of Chanhassen is undertaking a strategic migration from its existing virtualization infrastructure to the Scale
Computing HyperCore platform. This transition marks a signi cant step toward modernizing IT operations,
enhancing system resilience, and simplifying management.
Project Overview
The current virtualization environment, based on VMware and/or Hyper-V, has served the city well but presents
increasing challenges in terms of cost, complexity, and scalability. To address these concerns, the city has
selected Scale Computing, a hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) solution that integrates compute, storage, and
virtualization into a single, easy-to-manage platform.
Key Bene ts of Scale Computing
Simplicity and Ease of Management
Scale’s all-in-one architecture eliminates the need for separate storage networks and complex con gurations. IT
sta can manage the entire environment through a single, intuitive interface, reducing administrative overhead.
Cost E ciency
Unlike traditional virtualization platforms that often require separate licensing for hypervisors, management
tools, and support, Scale Computing o ers a consolidated pricing model with no additional hypervisor licensing
fees.
High Availability and Resilience
Built-in redundancy and automated failover ensure continuous availability of critical services. The system is
designed to self-heal and recover from hardware failures with minimal intervention.
Scalability
The platform allows for seamless scaling by simply adding nodes, with no disruption to existing workloads. This
exibility supports future growth without the need for major infrastructure overhauls.
Edge and Remote Site Optimization
Scale Computing is particularly well-suited for distributed environments, o ering robust performance in remote
or branch locations with limited IT resources.
Improved Performance and Reliability
With direct integration between the hypervisor and storage layers, Scale reduces latency and improves overall
system responsiveness.
Conclusion
Migrating to Scale Computing positions the City of Chanhassen for long-term success by reducing complexity,
lowering costs, and improving the reliability of its IT infrastructure. This move supports the city’s commitment to
delivering e cient, uninterrupted services to its residents and departments.
Statement of Work
106
Kicko /Meeting Call
Con gure Scale Cluster (3 Nodes)
Unbox and assemble hardware.
Con gure OOBM networking and licensing for each node.
Con gure switching VLANs and ports for LAN and BACKPLANE networks.
Install hardware into rack and connect to power and networking.
Establish node connectivity and con gure BACKPLANE networking.
Install latest Scale hardware and rmware updates on all nodes.
Enable SNMP monitoring on nodes.
Complete initial cluster setup and con guration.
Con gure DR Node
Unbox and assemble hardware.
Con gure OOBM networking and licensing for each node.
Con gure switching VLANs and ports for LAN and BACKPLANE networks.
Install hardware into rack and connect to power and networking.
Establish node connectivity and con gure BACKPLANE networking.
Install latest Scale hardware and rmware updates on all nodes.
Enable SNMP monitoring on nodes.
Complete initial cluster setup and con guration.
Con gure replication between Scale clusters.
Enable Fleet Manager on all clusters.
Customer Considerations
Vendor support-ability and compatibility with all applications should be veri ed with Scale Computing
hypervisor before proceeding with application migrations.
Su cient power, networking and switch capacity will be required for new cluster to be online at same time as
current server environment to allow for successful migration of all workloads.
Server Migration (Veeam)
Con gure Veeam Application for backups/replication.
Install Scale Appliance module on Scale cluster.
Install Hyper-V/ESXi module on legacy hardware (If required).
Create Conversion to VM plan for migration to Scale.
Allow VMs to properly backup to prepare for nal migration.
Per VM Cutover Process (VM downtime required - after hours recommended):
Shutdown legacy VM.
Complete nal backup.
Run convert to Scale VM process.
Power on Scale VM and install Scale Tools (VM reboot required).
Con gure proper networking on VM.
Con rm VM functionality and connectivity.
Disable VM from temporary backup plans.
Verify all virtual machines have been migrated to Scale and are functioning correctly.
Virtual Machine Migration List:
CAZAD
107
CFD1
CFS4
CFS5
ChanDC1
CHLSERV
CIS1
COMMSERV
CPS2
CPS4
CSEC2
CUS1
CUS4
CUS7
CVS2
LF-DMZ
SDHISTORIAN
SDSCADA
SDWIN911
SQL1
Veeam Proxy1
Veeam Proxy3
CHANDC2
CPW2
Server Replication
Enable DR replication for following servers:
CHANDC1
CAZAD
CFS5
CIS1
SQL1
CSEC2
SDHISTORIAN
SDSCADA
SDWIN911
LF-DMZ
Decommission Legacy Hardware
Verify all necessary services, functionality and data has been migrated from legacy hardware.
Verify any legacy servers or VMs have been removed from backups.
Shutdown legacy devices and disconnect from networking and power.
Remove from network rack and stage for customer to recycle hardware.
Post project QA checklist
Project Management
108
CIT will assign a dedicated resource to serve as the Project Manager (“Project Manager”). The Project Manager will
be responsible for overseeing the project, coordinating CIT resources, and serving as the primary point of contact
for the Customer. Responsibilities will include.
Managing project scope, including facilitating and documenting formal change requests.
Developing and maintaining the project schedule.
Leading regular status meetings with stakeholders, in accordance with the frequency agreed in the Project
Plan.
Maintaining live project status updates within the Customer Portal, where the Customer may view reports at
any time.
Performing additional project management activities as de ned in this Statement of Work
Facilitate a formal project closure, which may include a Project Closure meeting.
CIT Change Orders
CIT establishes change management procedures to initiate changes to the services identi ed in the SOW.
A change typically occurs when either party encounters any of the following situations during service delivery:
Either party identi es new requirements not included in the original service’s scope
Either party changes the direction and intent of this Service, which requires CIT to rework the services.
Small Changes
Changes less than 20% of the original scope will be managed informally with email veri cation by the PM.
Large Changes
Changes greater than 20% of the original scope will be managed with a formal approval process.
Scale Production Cluster Build:
Scale DR Node Build:
109
110
Proposal Summary
SCALE Production Cluster and DR Node
Quote information:
Quote #3529585-1-A
Prepared on: 9/25/2025
Expires: 10/25/2025
Account Executive: N/A | N/A | N/A https://www.citsolutions.net
Prepared for:
City Of Chanhassen Commercial
Attn Finance Dept PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317
Ship to:
City Of Chanhassen Commercial
Attn Finance Dept PO Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
One-time costs
Optional Description Qty Unit Price
Price
Including
Tax
SCALE Production Cluster with Support $102,395.87
N HC3450DF CHASSISXEON SP CPU 10X NVME 1U 3 $24,115.00 $72,345.00
N
Scale Computing Intel Xeon Gold (5th Gen) 5515+ Octa-core (8
Core) 3.20 GHz Processor Upgrade - 22.50 MB L3 Cache - 64-bit
Processing - 4.10 GHz Overclocking Speed - Socket LGA-4677 -
165 W - 16 Threads
6 $0.01 $0.06
N
Scale Computing RAM Module - For Server - 16 GB - DDR5-
5600/PC5-44800 DDR5 SDRAM - 5600 MHz - Registered - 288-
pin - DIMM
48 $0.01 $0.48
N NVME SSD 3.84TB 2.5 U.3 30 $0.01 $0.30
N INTEL X710-T4L4-PORT 10GBASE-T 3 $0.01 $0.03
N SC HYPERCORE 60 MONTH PROFESSIO ESSENTIALS SOFTWARE
AND SUPPORT 1 $20,200.00 $20,200.00
N 5 YRSHW WARRANTY 1 $7,300.00 $7,300.00
N Scale Computing ScaleCare - Premium Install - Service -
Technical - Electronic 1 $2,550.00 $2,550.00
DR Node $28,010.14
N HC3450F CHASSISXEON SP CPU 4X NVME 1U 1 $17,310.00 $17,310.00
N
Scale Computing Intel Xeon Gold (5th Gen) 5515+ Octa-core (8
Core) 3.20 GHz Processor Upgrade - 22.50 MB L3 Cache - 64-bit
Processing - 4.10 GHz Overclocking Speed - Socket LGA-4677 -
165 W - 16 Threads
1 $0.01 $0.01
N
Scale Computing RAM Module - For Server - 16 GB - DDR5-
5600/PC5-44800 DDR5 SDRAM - 5600 MHz - Registered - 288-
pin - DIMM
8 $0.01 $0.08
N Scale Computing 7.68 TB Solid State Drive - 2.5" Internal - U.3 4 $0.01 $0.04
111
Subtotal:$144,086.01
Tax:$0.00
Total:$144,086.01
N INTEL X710-T4L4-PORT 10GBASE-T 1 $0.01 $0.01
N SC//HYPERCORE - 8C-PS 5 YEAR LICENSE AND SOFTWARE 1 $8,600.00 $8,600.00
N 5 YRSHW WARRANTY 1 $1,750.00 $1,750.00
N Scale Computing Node Installation Remote Support - Service -
Technical - Electronic 1 $350.00 $350.00
CIT Services $13,680.00
N CIT Project Management 7 $128.00 $896.00
N CIT Services Engineer 32 $188.00 $6,016.00
N CIT Services Engineer (After Hours)24 $282.00 $6,768.00
Scale Promotional Items $0.00
N SC//HYPERCORE ADVANCED TRAINING 1 $0.00 $0.00
N WINDOWS/LINUX SERVERS ONLYPROMO SCALE COMPUTING
MOVE 1 $0.00 $0.00
N MARKETNG DISC SOFTWARE SERVICES ADVANCED TRAINING
QHAT 1 $0.00 $0.00
N PLATFORM 2026 REGISTRATION SC//PLATFORM ADVANCED
TRAINING 1 $0.00 $0.00
Notes:
Please note: Items marked with "Y" (Yes) in the optional column are not included in the subtotal, tax, or total calculations.
112
Acceptance and Incorporation by Reference
This Proposal, together with the terms and conditions set forth in the Master Services Agreement, Service Attachments and all other agreements identified
on Exhibit A (the agreements identi ed on Exhibit A are hereafter collectively referred to as the “Ancillary Agreements”) is between Computer Integration
Technologies, a Minnesota corporation (sometimes referred to as “we,” “us,” “our,” or “Provider”), and the customer identi ed on the signature block at the
end of this Proposal (sometimes referred to as “You,” Your,” or “Client”). Client and Provider expressly agree that the terms and conditions set forth in the
Ancillary Agreements are hereby incorporated into this Proposal by reference as if fully set forth herein, regardless of whether Client separately executed
any of the Ancillary Agreements. Notwithstanding that certain provisions of the Ancillary Agreements may not facially appear applicable to every
transaction or circumstance governed by this Proposal, each such provision shall be interpreted broadly and in context, and shall apply and control to the
extent such provision can reasonably be construed to apply to the rights, obligations, or subject matter hereof.
This Proposal shall be effective and shall automatically become a legally binding agreement as of the rst date upon which both Provider and Client have
signed below (the “Effective Date”). Provider and Client are sometimes referred to separately as a “Party”, or collectively as the ”Parties.” Any capitalized
terms in this Proposal not defined herein shall have the meaning provided in any Ancillary Agreement(s) de ning such capitalized term. If there is a direct
conflict between this Proposal and any term or condition set forth in any of the Ancillary Agreements, the con icting term or condition in this Proposal shall
control. By signing or accepting this Proposal, Client acknowledges, represents, and warrants to Provider that Client has read and agrees to all terms and
conditions set forth in the Ancillary Agreements on the E ective Date. The Parties agree that electronic signatures on this Proposal shall be relied upon and
shall bind the Parties to the terms and conditions stated or incorporated by reference herein. Each Party hereby warrants and represents that such Party is
authorized to execute this Proposal and perform the undertakings set forth or incorporated herein. This Proposal supersedes all prior negotiations,
proposals, orders, agreements and communications between the Parties regarding all matters expressly addressed or within the reasonable scope of this
Proposal or the Ancillary Agreements.
Client acknowledges and agrees that Provider may, from time to time, revise the terms and conditions of the Ancillary Agreements, provided that any such
revision shall be e ective only in accordance with applicable law, including prevailing legal standards for enforceable “clickwrap” or equivalent electronic
consent mechanisms. Revised terms or conditions shall become binding and e ective upon the earlier of: (a) Client’s continued use of the applicable
products or services following reasonably conspicuous notice and opportunity for Client to review the revised term(s) or condition(s); or (b) Client’s
a rmative acceptance of the revised term(s) via a click-through or similar method reasonably designed to con rm assent. Provider shall make revised
terms reasonably available for Client review which shall indicate the date of last revision. If Client does not agree to any revised term(s), Client must
discontinue use of the a ected products or services and may terminate this Proposal only in accordance with termination provisions set forth in the
Ancillary Agreements. Any revision(s) to the terms or conditions of the Ancillary Agreements by Provider shall apply only prospectively, unless otherwise
required by applicable law or expressly stated in the revised terms.
Client further agrees that the terms of the Ancillary Agreements shall apply not only to the speci c transaction described in this Proposal, but also to all
other current and future transactions between Client and Provider unless and until such terms are superseded by a subsequently executed Proposal or
Ancillary Agreement.
Both of the Parties, acting through their respectively authorized officers, agents, or representatives hereby execute this Proposal with the intention of being
bound hereby.
113
Exhibit A
Click the buttons below to view the linked documents.
Master Services Agreement Services Attachment for Managed Services Service Attachment for Access Control Services
Service Attachment for Managed Video Surveillance Schedule of Services Data Processing Agreement
Schedule of Third-Party Services
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Order Form is agreed to by the parties below and entered into as of the Order E ective Date.
City Of Chanhassen Commercial
Signature:
Name:
Date:
114
Quotation
Scale Computing
525 S Meridian St
Indianapolis, IN 46225
USA
Phone: (877) 722-5359
Email: sales@scalecomputing.com
Quote #:Q-94511-1
Date:9/23/2025 4:49 PM
Expires On:12/31/2025
Scale ID:SC-2507-9373
End User
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
United States
matt Kerr
9524069004
mkerr@chanhassenmn.gov
Registered Partner:
Scale Computing
Distributor:
Scale Computing
Scale Computing Representative Phone Email
Jacob Springer 812-682-7412 jspringer@scalecomputing.com
Production
PART #PRODUCT START END QTY MSRP/UNIT PRICE/UNIT TOTAL
PRICE
CHA-3-1F HC3450DF Chassis 3 $24,291.00 $24,291.00 $72,873.00
HCOS-5-PE SC//HyperCore 60 month
Essential Kit Software and
Support
License Tier: Professional
8/7/2025 8/6/2030 1 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00
CPU-3-23 Intel Xeon Gold 5515+6 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
RAM-3-16 16GB DDR5 RDIMM 48 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
NVM-3-1D 3.84TB 2.5" U.3 NVMe
SSD
30 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
NIC-3-11 4-ports 25Gb SFP28 OCP 3 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Page 1 of 3
115
PART #PRODUCT START END QTY MSRP/UNIT PRICE/UNIT TOTAL
PRICE
HW-5 5 Year HW Support for
Scale Computing HCI
Appliance
8/7/2025 8/6/2030 1 $7,287.30 $7,287.30 $7,287.30
QADVON ScaleCare Quickstart
Onsite Installation Services
1 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00
Production Total Price:$108,160.30
Group2
PART #PRODUCT START END QTY MSRP/UNIT PRICE/UNIT TOTAL
PRICE
MPVRR VMware Rip & Replace
Partner Promo
1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
ADTM-PROMO-20 PROMO Scale Computing
Move powered by
Carbonite Migrate
1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
QHAT SC//HyperCore Advanced
Training
1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
PLTFRM-REG/
QHAT-2026
Admission to Scale
Computing Platform 2026
Summit with SC//Platform
Advanced Training Service
Included
1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
QMIG-10 Migration Service 10 Pack 4 $4,750.00 $4,750.00 $19,000.00
Group2 Total Price:$19,000.00
DR
PART #PRODUCT START END QTY MSRP/UNIT PRICE/UNIT TOTAL
PRICE
CHA-3-1E HC3450F Chassis 1 $17,310.00 $17,310.00 $17,310.00
CPU-3-23 Intel Xeon Gold 5515+1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
RAM-3-16 16GB DDR5 RDIMM 8 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
NVM-3-1E 7.68TB 2.5" U.3 NVMe
SSD
4 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
NIC-3-11 4-ports 25Gb SFP28 OCP 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
HCOS-S-5-8C-PS SC//HyperCore - 8 core 60
Month license and support
software
License Tier: Professional
Support Level: ScaleCare
1/30/2026 1/29/2031 1 $9,563.00 $9,563.00 $9,563.00
Page 2 of 3
116
PART #PRODUCT START END QTY MSRP/UNIT PRICE/UNIT TOTAL
PRICE
HW-5 5 Year HW Support for
Scale Computing HCI
Appliance
1/30/2026 1/29/2031 1 $1,731.00 $1,731.00 $1,731.00
QADVON ScaleCare Quickstart
Onsite Installation Services
1 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00
DR Total Price:$34,604.00
Customer Total: USD 161,764.30
Order Lead Time Notice
Although our standard lead time on build-to-order systems is 4 weeks, please be aware that lead times may be extended due to the
availability of components at the time of your order. Once an order is placed, an anticipated ship date based on current knowledge of
said availability will be issued. Further communication regarding order timeframes will be issued and ASD from that point forwards, if
necessary. Order status can be tracked both through e-mail notifications and by accessing order details in the partner and customer
portals.
Terms & Conditions
Order: End User shall submit written/electronic purchase orders (as specified by SCALE) to approved Reseller or Distributor for
SCALE Products. By placing an order for SCALE software/hardware, End User agrees to be bound by the End User Software
License Agreement and the ScaleCare Terms and Conditions – available at https://www.scalecomputing.com/eula and https://
www.scalecomputing.com/terms-of-support-and-maintenance.
Shipping: SCALE will ship SCALE Products to the address specified on the purchase order. All SCALE Products shall be shipped
F.O.B. Origin (SCALE’s shipping point). End User shall be responsible for shipping costs, shipping insurance costs, shipping taxes and
shipping surcharges, if applicable. $60 per 1U node / $150 per 2U node will be invoiced for ground shipping in the US. Contact your
SCALE Sales Manager for International shipping rates.
Price: End User’s price for each unit will be determined based on SCALE’s list price at the time of order. End User is responsible for
paying any and all applicable sales and/or use tax to their appropriate revenue agency unless taxes are billed directly by SCALE.
Title: Title to hardware will pass to End User upon shipment of the SCALE Products in accordance with order terms above.
Returns: All orders are considered final. No returns of sold SCALE Products will be accepted.
Discounts offered by Scale Computing are one-time discounts, based on products and services offered in this quote. Discounts are only
valid until the expiration date on this quote and will not be carried forward for future orders.
Signature:
Effective Date:
______/______/______
Name (Print):
Title:
Please sign and email to po@scalecomputing.com.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS!
Page 3 of 3
117
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item Resolution 2025-XX: Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County for the
Mill Street Trail Improvement Project
File No.ENG 24-04 Item No: D.12
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council approves a cooperative agreement with Hennepin County for the
CSAH 82 (Mill Street) Trail Improvement Project."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Operational Excellence
SUMMARY
Hennepin County is planning to construct a new multi-use trail from Holly Lane in Chanhassen to
downtown Excelsior in 2026. Since a portion of the project is located in Chanhassen, a cooperative
agreement is required between the city and the county. Hennepin County is the lead agency for the
project, even though the portion in Chanhassen is in Carver County.
BACKGROUND
The project page is available from Hennepin County: https://www.hennepin.us/millstreet. Residents can
also subscribe to recieve email updates about the project from Hennepin County.
DISCUSSION
Upon completion of the project, the city will be responsible for future maintenance of the trail, which is
118
typical.
BUDGET
The city's cost share for the project is currently estimated at $52,819.56. The final amount will be
determined after bidding and construction of the project. The project is currently at the 95% design
level and is in final review. The funding will come from the Transportation Infrastructure Management
(TIM) fund, which is where our annual trail maintenance work is funded from. This project has been
planned as part of our 2026 Trail CIP.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approving the cooperative agreement with Hennepin County.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution-JPA with Hennepin County-Mill St Trail
Cooperative Agreement-Draft
119
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA
DATE: November 10, 2025 RESOLUTION NO: 2025-XX____
MOTION BY: SECONDED BY:
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ENTERING INTO A CONSTRUCTION
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR THE HENNEPIN
COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 82 (MILL STREET) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, Hennepin County and Chanhassen each has the authority to construct, maintain, repair,
and improve public streets within their respective jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, Hennepin County State Aid Highway 82 (CSAH 82), also known as Mill Street, and
Carver County State Aid Highway 17 (CSAH 17), also known as Powers Boulevard, are duly
dedicated public streets, partially located within the corporate limits of Chanhassen; and
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to undertake a joint project involving safety improvements,
grading, aggregate base, pavement surfacing, curb & gutter, sidewalk, multi-use trail, storm
sewer, and other incidentals; and
WHEREAS, Hennepin County is the lead agency for the project, including the areas located within
Carver County; and
WHEREAS, Hennepin County is responsible for all costs associated with the project design and
construction except any additional items that may be requested specifically by the City that the
County does not deem necessary to carry out the scope of the Project; and
WHEREAS, the authority of the Parties to enter into a Construction Cooperative Agreement is
provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CHANHASSEN CITY
COUNCIL authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to enter into a Construction Cooperative
Agreement with Hennepin County for the purposes of completing the improvements to Hennepin
County CSAH 82 and Carver County CSAH 17.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 10th day of November 2025.
ATTEST:
Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor
YES NO ABSENT
120
Agreement No. PW 23-55-25
County Project No. 2182300
County State Aid Highway 82
City of Chanhassen
County of Hennepin
1
CONSTRUCTION
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made between the County of Hennepin, a body politic and corporate under the
laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the “County”, and the City of
Chanhassen, a body politic and corporate, under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter
referred to as the “City.” The County and the City collectively are referred to as the “Parties.”
Recitals
The following Recitals are incorporated into this Agreement.
1. The County is leading a multimodal safety improvement project along County State Aid
Highway State Aid Highway (CSAH) 82, a/k/a Mill St., from 2nd Street in Excelsior, Hennepin
County, to approximately 400 feet south of the Hennepin and Carver County boundary line,
along CSAH 17, a/k/a Powers Blvd., in Chanhassen, Carver County. Improvements include
construction of a shared use path, ADA upgrades, and various other safety improvements as
shown in County Project (CP) 2182300 and as further illustrated in the attached Exhibit B
(Project Plan Title Sheet), all of which shall hereinafter be referred to as the “Project”.
2. The Parties have agreed to enter into this Agreement to memorialize the partnership and to
outline each party’s ownership and financial responsibilities, maintenance responsibilities, and
associated costs for the Project.
3. The Couty has been negotiating to enter into separate agreements with the Cities of Shorewood
(PW 24-46-25) and Excelsior (PW 21-27-25) for cost and maintenance responsibilities as part
of the Project.
4. The County has entered into a separate Joint Powers Agreement (PW 17-76-25) with Carver
County to outline each Party’s ownership, maintenance responsibilities, and authority to
acquire real property interests needed for the Project.
5. The County shall be the lead agency in Project designs, engineering, and construction
administration, and be responsible for acquiring all necessary right of way and/or other
governmental agencies-required permits needed for the Project.
6. The County Engineer has prepared an Engineer’s Estimate of quantities and unit prices for the
above described Project, and a copy of the Engineer’s Estimate and an estimated Division of
121
Agreement No. PW 23-55-25
CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300
2
Cost Summary, marked Exhibit A, is attached hereto.
7. The Project will be carried out by the Parties under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Section 162.17, Subdivision 1, and Section 471.59.
Agreement
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Term of Agreement, Survival of Terms, and Exhibits.
Effective Date. This Agreement is effective as of the date of the final signature.
Expiration Date. This Agreement will expire after the date in which all obligations
have been satisfactorily fulfilled.
Survival of Terms. Provisions that by their nature are intended to survive the term,
cancellation or termination of this Agreement do survive such term, cancellation or
termination. Such provisions include but are not limited to: Maintenance
Responsibilities, Records/Audits, Indemnification, Insurance, Worker Compensation
Claims, Cancellation, Termination, and Minnesota Laws Govern.
Exhibits. All exhibits are attached and incorporated into this Agreement.
1.4.1 Exhibit A (Division of Cost Summary)
1.4.2 Exhibit B (Project Plan Title Sheet)
2. Project Construction.
Contract Award and Administration. The County or its agents shall prepare the
necessary plans, specifications, and proposal; obtain approval of the plans and
specifications from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) and the
City; advertise for bids for the work and construction; receive and open bids pursuant
to the advertisement; enter into a contract with the successful bidder at the unit prices
specified in the bid of such bidder; administer the contract; and perform the required
engineering and inspection; all in accordance with the plans and specifications set forth
below.
Plans and Specifications.
2.2.1 Design Work. All design work performed by the County and its agents that is
to be incorporated into the bidding documents for the Project shall be prepared
122
Agreement No. PW 23-55-25
CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300
3
and certified by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. All
designs which affect County facilities shall conform to MnDOT Design
Standards applicable to County State Aid Highways and to the requirements of
the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards, and be approved by the
County Engineer. All designs which affect City facilities shall conform to the
City’s Standard Specifications and Detail Plates.
2.2.2 Plan Numbers (S.A.P.#/S.P.# and S.G.#). The plans and specifications are
referenced and identified as S.A.P #027-682-003 and SG-25-M-AT-07 and shall
be approved by MnDOT and the Metropolitan Council before Project
construction. The City’s project number is 24-04.
2.2.3 Request for Copies of Plans. At the request of the City, the County or its agents
shall furnish the City with any working copies of any plans, designs or reports
at any time during the Project design process.
Construction Supervision and Inspection. The County or its agents will administer
the construction contract, and perform all necessary engineering, inspection and testing
of all the contract work. All work for the Project shall be completed in compliance with
the MnDOT and City approved plans and specifications. The City Engineer or a
designated representative shall have the right, as the work progresses, to enter upon the
job site to make any inspections deemed necessary and shall cooperate with the County
Engineer and staff at their request to the extent necessary but will have no responsibility
for the supervision of the work.
Plan Changes and Additional Construction.
2.4.1 Plan Changes. The City agrees that the County may make changes in the plans
or in the character of the contract construction that are reasonably necessary to
cause the construction to be in all things performed and completed in a
satisfactory manner. It is further agreed by the City that the County may enter
into any change orders or supplemental agreements with the County’s contractor
for the performance of any additional construction or construction occasioned
by any necessary, advantageous or desirable changes in plans, within the original
scope of the Project.
2.4.2 Review Proposed Changes. The City shall have the right to review any
proposed changes to the plans and specifications as they relate to the City's cost
participation prior to the work being performed, except in emergencies, and in
those instances where the proposed changes necessitate a re-engineering of the
design and/or specifications, the County shall submit the re-engineered design
and/or specifications to the City. The City Engineer or designated representative
shall respond to the County’s request for approval to authorize the issuance of
any negotiated change orders or supplemental agreements prepared by the
County that affect the City's share of the construction cost within a reasonable
time frame.
Right of Way/Permit.
123
Agreement No. PW 23-55-25
CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300
4
2.5.1 Right of Way Acquisition. The County or its agents shall acquire all additional
right of way, permits and/or easements required for the construction of the
Project.
2.5.2 Access Rights and Permits. To the extent permitted by law, the City shall
transfer, convey, permit, or otherwise allow the use of property rights controlled
or maintained by the City, including but not limited to easements or access
rights, that may be required by the County for the Project. The Parties
understand that any such access rights shall be subject to the City Council
approval and will be granted at no cost to the County. Any and all permits
required by the City for the Project shall be granted at no cost or expense to the
County or its contractors. These permits include but are not limited to the
following: obstruction permits, after hours work permits, and permits related to
City water and sanitary infrastructure. The County shall also obtain, and comply
with, any and all permits and approvals required from other governmental or
regulatory agencies to accomplish the Project.
2.5.3 Right of Way Cost. The City shall participate in the right of way cost for the
Project as provided herein. The Parties understand and agree that the City’s
share of the Project right of way cost is fifty percent (50%) of the total Project
right of way cost (“City’s Right of Way Cost”). As further described in Exhibit
A, the City’s Right of Way Cost is currently estimated to be $30,845.00 which
shall be paid to the County as a part of the City’s total cost participation in the
Project.
Asbestos. The Project may include the removal of asbestos containing electrical
conduit. Only firms licensed to conduct asbestos abatement shall be used for the safe
removal of asbestos containing electrical conduit with proper shipping manifest
prepared and submitted to appropriate agency. The lead agency in the Project
construction shall be responsible for the oversight of the removal of asbestos containing
electrical conduit and compliance with the abovementioned specifications.
Detours. The Project may require limited detouring of traffic onto the City’s streets.
The Parties agree that there will be no compensation to the City for detours onto its
streets required to construct the Project.
3. Cost Participation. In addition to the City’s Right of Way Cost for the Project as stated in
Subsection 2.5.3, the City shall participate in the Project contract construction costs (“Contract
Construction Costs”), associated design engineering fees (“Design Engineering Costs”), and
Project construction administration fees (“Construction Engineering Costs”), collectively
(“City’s Cost Participation”) as provided herein.
Contract Construction Costs and Exhibit A Unit Prices. The City’s Cost
Participation shall include the Contract Construction Costs for the Project as set forth
in the estimated Division of Cost Summary shown in Exhibit A. It is recognized by
the parties that $1,000,000.00 in Active Transportation funds have been awarded for
the project by the Metropolitan Council’s Transportation Advisory Board. It is
124
Agreement No. PW 23-55-25
CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300
5
understood by the parties that the $1,000,000.00 in Active Transportation funds will
be allocated in such a manner to first reduce the City’s share of the Contract
Construction Costs. In the event that Active Transportation Funds are not fully
allocated, the remainder of Active Transportation funds are allowed to reduce the
County’s share of the Contract Construction Costs. For informational purposes only,
the City’s share in Contract Construction Costs is currently estimated to be
$68,671.00. The respective proportionate shares of the pro-rata pay items included in
Exhibit A shall remain unchanged throughout the life of this Agreement. The Parties
each understand and agree that the amount shown in Exhibit A is an estimate of the
Contract Construction Costs on the Project and the unit prices set forth in the contract
with the successful bidder and the final quantities as measured by the County
Engineer's designated representatives shall govern in computing and apportioning the
Parties’ total final Contract Construction Costs for the Project. The final quantities as
measured by the County Engineer's designated representatives for contract pay items
in which the City is participating shall be subject to review and approval by the City
Engineer.
Design Engineering and Construction Engineering Costs. The City’s Cost
Participation shall also include reimbursement to the County for the City’s proportionate
share of the Design Engineering Costs and Construction Engineering Costs for the
Project. The City’s share of the Design Engineering Costs shall be equal to twelve
percent (12%) of the total final amount of the City’s share of the Contract Construction
Costs for the Project. For informational purposes only, the City’s share in Design
Engineering Costs is currently estimated to be $8,241.00. The City’s share of the
Construction Engineering Costs shall be equal to ten percent (10%) of the total final
amount of the City’s share of the Contract Construction Costs for the Project as specified
in Subsection 3.1 above. For informational purposes only, the City’s share in
Construction Engineering Costs is currently estimated to be $6,867.00. The Parties
understand and agree that the City’s proportionate shares of the Design Engineering and
Construction Engineering Costs as listed in Exhibit A are estimated, and the City’s
actual proportionate shares will be computed using the total final amount of the City’s
share of the Contract Construction Costs for the Project.
4. Payment.
Amount Due. The City agrees to pay the City’s Cost Participation amount as described
herein.
When to Invoice. After an award by the County to the successful bidder on the Project,
the County shall invoice the City for ninety five percent (95%) of the City’s Cost
Participation for the Project. The City’s Cost Participation shall be based on actual
contract unit prices applied to the estimated quantities shown in the plans.
Pay to the Order of. Payments shall be made to the County, in the name of the
Hennepin County Treasurer, by the City for the full amount due stated on the invoices
within forty five (45) days of the invoice date.
125
Agreement No. PW 23-55-25
CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300
6
Where to Send Payment. The payment should include the date, the name of the
County’s project manager (Mr. Jay Hill, P.E.), project name and county project number
(C.P. 2182300). Payment and supporting documentation should be mailed to the
following address:
Hennepin County Accounts Receivable
Mail Code 131
300 South 6th St
Minneapolis, MN 55487
Supplemental Agreement or Change Order. In the event the County Engineer or the
County's staff determines the need to amend the construction contract with a
supplemental agreement or change order which results in an increase in the contract
amount for the Project, the City hereby agrees to remit within forty five (45) days of
notification by the County of the change an amount equal to ninety five percent (95%)
of the estimated City’s shares as documented in the supplemental agreement or change
order.
Final Amount Due. The remainder of the City’s shares in the engineering and contract
construction costs of the Project, including additional costs resulting from supplemental
agreements and change orders, will be due the County upon acceptance by the County’s
construction engineer of all the construction work performed by the County’s
construction contractor and submittal of the County Engineer's final estimate for the
Project to the City.
Remaining Balance. Upon final payment to the Project contractor by the County, any
amount remaining as a balance in the deposit account will be returned to the City, within
45 days, on a proportionate basis based on the City’s initial deposit amount and the
City’s final proportionate share of the Project costs. Likewise, any amount due the
County from the City upon final payment by the County shall be paid by the City as its
final payment for the construction and engineering costs of the Project within forty five
(45) days of receipt of an invoice from the County.
5. The City’s Maintenance Responsibilities. Upon completion of the Project, the City shall
provide year-round maintenance at its sole cost as outlined below.
Roadways. The City will not be responsible for roadway maintenance of CSAH 17
(Powers Blvd).
Sidewalks, Pedestrian Ramps, and Off-street Shared-use Paths/Trails. The City
shall own and maintain sidewalks, pedestrian ramps, and off-street shared-use
paths/trails located within Chanhassen’s municipal boundary constructed as part of the
Project according to City practices at no cost to the County. Maintenance includes but
is not limited to repairing faulted or broken panels or surfaces, vegetation control, and
snow and ice removal.
126
Agreement No. PW 23-55-25
CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300
7
Storm Sewers. Storm sewers shall not be maintained by the City. See Carver County
Agreement (PW 17-76-25) for storm sewer maintenance.
6. The County’s Maintenance Responsibilities. Hennepin County will not be responsible for
any maintenance activities within Carver County/Chanhassen.
7. Authorized Representatives. In order to coordinate the services of the County with the
activities of the City and vice versa so as to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement, the
Hennepin County Highway Engineer or designated representative and the City Engineer or
designated representatives shall manage this Agreement on behalf of the County and the City.
County of Hennepin:
Carla Stueve
County Highway Engineer
Hennepin County Public Works
1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN 55340
Office: 612-596-0356
Carla.Stueve@hennepin.us
City of Chanhassen:
Charles Howley
Public Works Director/City Engineer
7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317
Office: 952-227-1169
Email: chowley@chanhassenmn.gov
8. Assignment, Amendments, Default, Waiver, Agreement Complete, Cancellation or
Termination.
Assignment. The City shall not assign, subcontract, transfer or pledge this Agreement
and/or the services to be performed hereunder, whether in whole or in part, without the
prior written consent of the County.
Amendments. Any alterations, variations, modifications or waivers of provisions of
this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an
amendment to this Agreement and signed by the Parties hereto.
Default. If the City fails to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement or so fails
to administer the work as to endanger the performance of the Agreement, this shall
constitute a default. Unless the City's default is excused by the County, the County may
upon written notice immediately cancel this Agreement in its entirety.
Waiver. The County's failure to insist upon strict performance of any provision or to
127
Agreement No. PW 23-55-25
CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300
8
exercise any right under this Agreement shall not be deemed a relinquishment or waiver
of the same, unless consented to in writing. Such consent shall not constitute a general
waiver or relinquishment throughout the entire term of the Agreement.
Agreement Complete. The entire Agreement between the Parties is contained herein
and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the
Parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this Agreement are
incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement.
Cancellation or Termination. This Agreement may be terminated or cancelled by
each party by mutual agreement with or without cause by either party upon thirty (30)
day written notice. This Agreement shall be terminated or cancelled by any party upon
a material breach by the other party. In the event of a termination or cancellation, the
Parties will remain responsible for cost participation as provided in this Agreement for
obligations incurred up through the effective date of the termination or cancellation,
subject to any equitable adjustment that may be required to account for the effects of a
breach.
9. Indemnification.
The City Indemnifies the County. The City agrees to defend, indemnify and hold
harmless the County, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers, and employees from any
liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs or expenses,
including reasonable attorneys’ fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or
omission of the City or the City’s consultant or sub consultant, anyone directly or
indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may
be liable in the performance of the services required by this Agreement, and against all
loss by reason of the failure of the City to perform fully, in any respect, all obligations
under this Agreement. The City’s liability shall be governed by the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 or other applicable law.
The County Indemnifies the City. The County agrees to defend, indemnify and hold
harmless the City, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers, and employees from any
liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs or expenses,
including reasonable attorneys’ fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or
omission of the County or the County’s consultant or sub consultant, anyone directly or
indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may
be liable in the performance of the services required by this Agreement, and against all
loss by reason of the failure of the County to perform fully, in any respect, all obligations
under this Agreement. The County’s liability shall be governed by the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 or other applicable law.
10. Insurance. Each party warrants that it has a purchased insurance or a self-insurance program
sufficient to meet its liability obligations and, at a minimum, to meet the maximum liability
limits of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466. This provision shall not be construed as a waiver of
any immunity from liability under Chapter 466 or any other applicable law.
11. Worker Compensation Claims.
128
Agreement No. PW 23-55-25
CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300
9
City’s Employees. Any and all employees of the City and all other persons engaged by
the City in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to
be performed by the City shall not be considered employees of the County, and any and
all claims that may or might arise under the Workers' Compensation Act or the
Unemployment Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of the employees
while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of
any act or omission on the part of the employees while so engaged on any of the work
or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or
responsibility of the County.
County’s Employees. Any and all employees of the County and all other persons
engaged by the County in the performance of any work or services required or provided
for herein to be performed by the County shall not be considered employees of the City,
and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workers' Compensation Act or
the Unemployment Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of the
employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a
consequence of any act or omission on the part of the employees while so engaged on
any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the
obligation or responsibility of the City.
12. Records/Audits. The City agrees that the County, the State Auditor or any of their duly
authorized representatives at any time during normal business hours, and as often as they may
reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt and
transcribe any books, documents, papers, records, etc., which are pertinent to the Project and
the accounting practices and procedures of the City which involve transactions relating to this
Agreement.
13. Nondiscrimination. The provisions of Minnesota Statute Section 181.59 and of any
applicable local ordinance relating to civil rights and discrimination and the Affirmative Action
Policy statement of Hennepin County shall be considered a part of this Agreement as though
fully set forth herein.
14. Counterparts/Electronic Signatures. This Agreement may be executed in one or more
counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original copy of this Agreement and all of
which, when taken together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement. The
facsimile, email or other electronically delivered signatures of the Parties shall be deemed to
constitute original signatures, and facsimile or electronic copies hereof shall be deemed to
constitute duplicate originals.
15. Minnesota Laws Govern. The laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all questions and
interpretations concerning the validity and construction of this Agreement and the legal
relations between the Parties and their performance. The appropriate venue and jurisdiction
for any litigation will be those courts located within the County of Hennepin, State of
Minnesota. Litigation, however, in the federal courts involving the Parties will be in the
appropriate federal court within the State of Minnesota.
(This space left intentionally blank)
129
Agreement No. PW 23-55-25
CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300
10
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
by their respective duly authorized officers and agree to be bound by the provisions herein set
forth.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
By:_______________________________
Mayor
Date:______________________________
And: ______________________________
City Manager
Date:______________________________
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
ATTEST:
By: By: __________________________________
Deputy/Clerk of the County Board Chair of its County Board
Date: Date: ________________________________
And: ________________________________
County Administrator
Date: ________________________________
REVIEWED BY
THE COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE: And:_________________________________
Assistant County Administrator, Public Works
By: Date:________________________________
Assistant County Attorney
Date:
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
REVIEWED: By:_________________________________
By: County Highway Engineer
County Administrative Clerk Date:________________________________
Date:
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
By:_________________________________
Department Director, Transportation
Operations
Date:________________________________
130
Agreement No. PW 23-55-25
CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300
11
EXHIBIT A
Engineer’s Estimate and Division of Cost Summary
131
Agreement No. PW 23-55-25
CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300
12
EXHIBIT B
Project Plan Title Sheet
132
Agreement No. PW 23-55-25
CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300
13
133
Agreement No. PW 23-55-25
CSAH No. 82; C.P. 2182300
14
134
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item Resolution 2025-XX: Call Public Improvement Hearing for the 2026 City
Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 26-01
File No.ENG Project No. 26-01
CIP No. ST-012 Item No: D.13
Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA
Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer
Reviewed By Charlie Howley
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution calling for a Public Hearing regarding the
improvements for the 2026 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 26-01 to be held on November
24, 2025."
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Asset Management
SUMMARY
Consider calling for a Public Hearing regarding the feasibility of the proposed improvements to be held
at the City Council meeting on November 24, 2025.
BACKGROUND
As part of the overall Pavement Management Program (PMP), the city annually plans to rehabilitate a
section or sections of public streets across the city. The five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
identifies the near-term streets to be rehabilitated. The 2026 project includes approximately 2.2 miles of
streets for rehabilitation via mill and overlay, full-depth reclamation, and/or total reconstruction.
Key dates and items relative to the project:
135
On June 13, 2025, the Engineering Department released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for design and
construction services for the 26-01 project.
On June 20, 2025, the Engineering Department released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for geotechnical
services for the 26-01 project.
On July 14, 2025, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with Houston
Engineering, Inc. for design and construction services for the project.
On July 14, 2025, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with Braun Intertec for
geotechnical exploration and engineering services in association with the 26-01 design contract.
On November 19, 2025, the Engineering Department will host an Open House meeting with the
impacted properties to discuss the project and respond to questions.
The project webpage is:
https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/government/projects/street-projects/2026-city-pavement-rehabilitation-
project
DISCUSSION
Staff utilized the City's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project
limits as shown in the attached 5-year CIP map representing the years 2025 through 2029. The
Vasserman neighborhood (mill & overlay) and the Fox Hollow (full reconstruction) were on the CIP.
Both neighborhoods have not received major rehabilitation since the original street construction. Only
minor maintenance activities such as pothole patching, crack sealing, and sealcoating have been
performed in these areas.
Schedule
Task Date
Public Open House/Neighborhood Meeting #1 November 19, 2025
Accept Feasibility Study, Conduct Public (Improvement) Hearing,
and Order Project November 24, 2025
Approve Plans and Specifications. Authorize Advertisement for Bids January 12, 2026
Bid Opening February 10, 2026
Call for Public (Assessment) Hearing February 23, 2026
Public Open House/Neighborhood Meeting #2 February 25, 2026
Conduct Public (Assessment) Hearing, Accept Bids, Adopt
Assessment Roll, and Award Construction Contract March 9, 2026
Begin Construction May 2026
Substantial Completion Early November 2026
Final Completion June 2027
BUDGET
136
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council call for a Public Hearing regarding the improvements for City
Project Number 26-01 to be held during the Council meeting on November 24, 2025, to facilitate
receiving public input regarding the feasibility of the project.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution - Call Improvement PH for 26-01
5-Year Street Rehabilitation CIP Map 2025-2029
137
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
DATE: November 10, 2025 RESOLUTION NO: 2025-XX
MOTION BY: SECONDED BY:
A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE
2026 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT NO. 26-01
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted July 14, 2025, a feasibility report is
currently being prepared by Houston Engineering, Inc. with reference to the above-referenced project,
and this report will be received by the Council on November 24, 2025, and
WHEREAS, the feasibility report will provide information regarding whether the proposed
project is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in
connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended;
and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council:
1. The Council will receive and accept the feasibility study on November 10, 2025, and consider
the improvements of such project in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting
properties for a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
429.
2. A public hearing for the proposed improvements within the 2026 City Pavement Rehabilitation
Project No. 26-01 shall be held on November 24, 2025, in the Council Chambers of City Hall at
7:00 PM.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 10th day of November 2025.
ATTEST:
Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor
YES NO ABSENT
138
########################################################################################################################################################################M
M
M
M
M
Lake
Virginia
Christmas
Lake
Lotus Lake
Brendan
Pond
Lake
Harrison
Kerber Pond
Lake Susan Rice
Marsh
Lake
Lake Riley
Rice Lake
Lake
St.
Joe
Lake
Minnewashta
Lake Ann
Lake Lucy
ST18
ST14
ST15
ST17
ST61
Minnewashta
Regional Park
North
Lotus
Lake Park
Meadow
Green
Park
Lake Ann Park
Chanhassen
Pond
Park
Chanhassen
Nature
Preserve
Chanhassen
Recreation
Center
Lake
Susan
Park
Rice Marsh
Lake Preserve
Power
Hill Park
Fox
Woods
Preserve
Bandimere
Community
Park
Bluff Creek
Golf Course
Hesse Farm
Park
Preserve
Lake
Susan
Preserve
City
Center
Park
Raguet Wildlife
Management
Are
MN Valley
National Wildlife Re
MN Landscape
Arboretum
Seminary Fen
Scientific
& Nat*
Bluff Creek
Preserve
Independent
School
District 11
Independent
School District
112
Independent School
District
276
Riley
Ridge
Park
Lake Ann Park
Preserve
SA7
SA101
SA5
SA5
SA41
)212 PowersBlvdLyman Blvd ChanhassenRdA r b o r e t u m Blvd
Pioneer Trl
A r boretum Blvd
GalpinBlvdH w y212Hwy 212Hazeltine BlvdMa
r
k
etBl
v
dPowers BlvdHwy 7AudubonRdF ly in g C lo u d D r Great
Plains
BlvdC
o
R
d
1
0
1
ST101
ST101
Date Created: 10/23/2024
Document Path: K:\Departments\Engineering\CIP\2025-2029\CIP_5Year_2025-2029.aprxCreated By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department µ0 3,000
Feet
0 0.5
Mile
5-Year CIP Pavement Management Plan (PMP) - Streets
(2025-2029)
City of Chanhassen
Legend
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
Mill & Overlay
Full Depth Reclamation
##Reconstruction
M Municipal State Aid
139
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item
Resolution 2025-XX: Accept Feasibility Study, Conduct Public Improvement
Hearing, and Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the 2026
Great Plains Blvd/Lake Dr East Rehabilitation Project No. 26-02
File No.ENG Project No. 26-02
CIP No. ST-012 Item No: G.1
Agenda Section PUBLIC HEARINGS
Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer
Reviewed By Charlie Howley
SUGGESTED ACTION
"The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution accepting the feasibility study, ordering the
improvements, and authorizing preparation of plans and specifications for the 2026 Great Plains
Blvd/Lake Dr East Rehabilitation Project No. 26-02."
Motion Type 4/5 Vote
Strategic
Priority Asset Management
SUMMARY
Accept the feasibility study and host the first public hearing for the project, known as the 'Improvement
Hearing,' associated with the M.S. 429 special assessment process in order to review the findings of the
feasibility study and discuss specific aspects of the project. Follow up the public hearing portion of the
agenda item with a decision regarding ordering production of plans and specifications for the project.
BACKGROUND
As part of the overall Pavement Management Program (PMP), the city annually plans to rehabilitate a
section or sections of public streets across the city. The Five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
identifies the near-term streets to be rehabilitated. This 2026 project includes approximately 0.5 mile of
140
city state-aid streets for rehabilitation.
Key dates and items relative to the project:
On May 16, 2025, the Engineering Department released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for design and
construction services for the 26-02 project.
On June 20, 2025, the Engineering Department released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for geotechnical
services for the 26-02 project.
On June 23, 2025, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with I&S Group, Inc.
(ISG) for design and construction services for the project.
On July 14, 2025, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with Braun Intertec for
geotechnical exploration and engineering services in association with the 25-01 design contract.
On October 27, 2025, the City Council called for a Public Hearing to be held regarding the proposed
improvements on November 10, 2025.
On October 30, 2025, the Engineering Department hosted a public Open House meeting at City Hall to
discuss the project and respond to questions with the impacted properties.
Project information is available on the city's website at:
https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/government/projects/street-projects/great-plains-lake-drive-east-
rehabilitation-project
To subscribe to the city's distribution list in order to receive routine project updates - interested
residents and property owners should visit the following link to sign up:
https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/i-want-to/subscribe.
(There are 462 subscribers as of November 4, 2025.)
DISCUSSION
Staff utilized the City's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project
limits as shown in the attached 5-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) map representing the years 2025
through 2029.
This section of Lake Dr E was originally constructed between 1983 and 1987. It was last seal-coated in
2012. Portions of the concrete curbing and sidewalk along the Lake Dr E corridor has not held up well
and is in poor condition. A higher percentage of concrete related repairs are warranted in comparison to
other full depth reclamation (FDR) projects the city has recently completed. Great Plains Blvd was
originally constructed in 1973, last reconstructed in 1991, and last rehabilitated in 2001. It was seal-
coated in 2013.
ISG was provided the city's asset management and geotechnical information relative to this project to
factor into the feasibility analysis to incorporate with the subsequent design. Based on the existing
maintenance and rating history, on-site street observations, and the feasibility analysis; Lake Dr E is
expected to be rehabilitated via FDR but Great Plains can be rehabilitated via mill & overlay (M&O).
A major component of this project is to evaluate the intersection of Great Plains Blvd and Lake Dr E.
141
This intersection currently is a two-way stop controlled intersection with the Great Plains legs being
uncontrolled. ISG performed an intersection control evaluation and recommends one of two alternatives
to improve the intersection from an operations perspective. The first, and less costly, alternative is to
switch the intersection to a four-way stop controlled intersection. The second is to install a mini-
roundabout. The mini-roundabout would provide the best overall level of service but at an estimated
additional cost of $380,000.
As with any street project area which includes rehabilitation there will be spot repair of curb and gutter.
This project in particular will include long segments of curb replacement along Lake Dr E. Sidewalk
scoping will include diamond grinding misaligned joints that have heaved primarily due to freeze-thaw
and replacement of significantly damaged sidewalk panels. Existing pedestrian ramps impacted by the
project will be brought into ADA compliance in accordance with the city's ADA transition plan.
Pedestrian crosswalk areas will also be checked for conformance with the City's Crosswalk Policy.
City public works staff performed a condition assessment on the existing utilities within the project
areas. There weren't any significant improvements scoped in relation to the sanitary sewer and
watermain networks. The sanitary and storm sewer pipe networks were televised, and the existing
structures were evaluated to assess the need for improvements.
An "Open House" style meeting was hosted on Thursday, October 30, at City Hall. A summary of the
discussions held and feedback received will be incorporated into the presentation at the City Council
meeting on November 10. Twenty-seven residents interested in the project attended the open house.
Generally the common theme from the meeting was the residents believe there is a need for the project
and they were supportive of the project. The vast majority of the residents were from the Marsh
Dr/Hidden Ct neighborhoods to the south. Their main concerns was related to assessments and they
were happy to learn they would not be assessed with this project. The Great Plains/Lake Dr E
intersection was the second most discussed topic. After a detailed discussion took place relative to this
intersection the majority of these participants indicated a preference towards installation of a mini-
roundabout. The other primary discussion topic was related to pedestrian safety. Only a couple resident
surveys have been received to date but they are also generally supportive of the project.
Schedule
Task Date
Approve Plans and Specifications. Authorize Advertisement for Bids January 12, 2026
Bid Opening February 4, 2026
Call for Public (Assessment) Hearing February 9, 2026
Public Open House/Neighborhood Meeting #2 February 11, 2026
Conduct Public (Assessment) Hearing, Accept Bids, Adopt
Assessment Roll, and Award Construction Contract February 23, 2026
Begin Construction May 2026
Substantial Completion October 2026
Final Completion June 2027
142
BUDGET
This project is included in the 5-year CIP. Funding for the project is proposed to come from the
Pavement Management Program (PMP) fund, which includes special assessments to benefiting
properties as part of the revenue source. The special assessments will be managed per the City’s
Assessment Policy. The Utility Enterprise funds will be utilized to cover the rehabilitation needs
specific to each utility.
The overall 26-02 project budget approved with the 2025-29 CIP was $950,000 but has been updated in
the 2026-30 CIP to $1,400,000.
The feasibility study prepared by ISG estimates the cost of the proposed improvements. The table below
indicates the estimated cost in comparison to the project budget.
Fund Project Budget
Estimate
(All-Way
Stop)
Estimate
(Mini-
Roundabout)
PMP (Street)$1,380,000 $1,210,000 $1,592,000
Surface Water (Storm Sewer)$10,000 $57,000 $57,000
Sanitary Sewer $5,000 $17,000 $17,000
Watermain $5,000 $23,000 $23,000
Total $1,400,000 $1,307,000 $1,689,000
The estimated costs include a 10% contingency along with soft (non-construction) costs such as
engineering, geotechnical, and testing.
The project with the roundabout intersection would be over budget.
The preliminary special assessment amounts distributed to the commercial properties along the corridor
are indicated in the attached feasibility study. There are not any single-family properties within the
project area which will be assessed. Hence, the flat fee portion of the Assessment Policy is not
applicable to this project.
RECOMMENDATION
From an engineering and financing perspective this project is necessary, feasible and cost effective.
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution accepting the feasibility study, ordering the
improvements, and authorizing production of plans and specifications for the City Project Number 26-
02.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution - Accept Feasibility Study - Conduct PH - Order P&S for 26-02
26-02 Pavement Rehab Feasibility Report
CIP Sheet 2026
Streets 5-Year CIP Map - 2025-2029
143
Assessment Policy 2025 Update
144
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
DATE: November 10, 2025 RESOLUTION NO: 2025-XX
MOTION BY: SECONDED BY:
A RESOLUTION FOR ACCEPTING THE FEASIBILITY STUDY, CONDUCTING A
PUBLIC HEARING, AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
2026 LAKE DRIVE EAST REHABILITATION PROJECT NO. 26-02
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted June 23, 2025, a feasibility report
has been prepared by ISG with reference to the above-referenced project, and this report is being
received by the Council on November 10, 2025, and
WHEREAS, the feasibility report provides information regarding whether the proposed project
is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection
with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a
description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels.
WHEREAS, on October 27, 2025, the City Council called for the public hearing to be held on
November 10, 2025, for the 2026 Lake Drive East Rehabilitation Project No. 26-02. The project
includes street, drainage, and utility system improvements along Great Plains Blvd from TH 5 to
Grandview Rd in addition to Lake Dr East from Great Plains to 550’ west of the intersection with
Dakota Avenue, included in the 2026 Lake Drive East Rehabilitation Project No. 26-02, and
WHEREAS, a minimum of ten (10) days’ mailed noticed and two (2) weeks’ published notice
of the Public Hearing was given; and
WHEREAS, the public hearing was held thereon the 10th day of November, 2025, in the
Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, at which all persons desiring to be
heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council:
1. The Council will receive and accept the feasibility study on November 10, 2025, and consider
the improvements of such project in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting
properties for a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
429.
2. Such improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible as detailed in the project’s
Feasibility Study.
3. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the Council resolution adopted June 23,
2025.
4. The Council authorizes preparation of plans and specifications for the 2026 Lake Drive East
Rehabilitation Project No. 26-02.
5. The Council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvement from
the proceeds of tax exempt bonds. 145
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 10th day of November, 2025.
ATTEST:
Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor
YES NO ABSENT
146
Feasibility Report
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project
City Project No. 26-02
November 3, 2025
ISG Project No. 25-33064
For:
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Blvd
Chanhassen, MN 55317
From:
Jake Guzik, PE
Civil Engineer
ISG
7900 International Dr, Suite 550
Bloomington, MN 55425
612.353.7042
Jake.Guzik@ISGInc.com
147
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com i
SIGNATURE SHEET
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under
my direct supervision and that i am a duly licensed professional engineer
under the laws of the state of Minnesota.
Jacob D. Guzik, PE
Civil Engineer
Reg. No. 55422
ISG
7900 International Dr, Suite 550
Bloomington, MN 55425
612.353.7042
Jake.Guzik@ISGInc.com
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project (City Project No. 26-02)
Chanhassen, MN
Engineer's Project Number: 25-33064
Dated this 3 day of November, 2025
148
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project ................................................................................................................................................. i
Signature Sheet ......................................................................................................................................................................................... i
Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................................................................... ii
Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................................. 1
Project Need and Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2
Proposed Improvements .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Streets .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Storm Sewer .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
Sanitary Sewer ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
Water Main ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 5
Private Utilities ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
Construction Limits and Traffic Control ................................................................................................................................................ 5
Opinion of Probable Cost .......................................................................................................................................................................... 6
Construction Cost Summary ................................................................................................................................................................. 6
Discussion.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 6
Financing and Assessments ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7
Financing Overview ............................................................................................................................................................................... 7
Funding Sources and Allocation ........................................................................................................................................................... 7
Assessment Process and Application .................................................................................................................................................. 7
Schedule ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 11
Public Engagement ................................................................................................................................................................................ 11
Findings and Recommendations .......................................................................................................................................................... 12
Findings ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 12
Recommendation ............................................................................................................................................................................... 13
Appendix A: Opinion of Probable Costs .................................................................................................................................................... A
Appendix B: Intersection Control Evaluation ........................................................................................................................................... B
149
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Chanhassen has identified Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard as priority corridors for pavement rehabilit ation under the
City’s 2026 Pavement Management Program. The existing pavement conditions —measured by Pavement Condition Index (PCI) values—range
from the low 40s along Lake Drive East to the low-to-mid 60s along Great Plains Boulevard. These ratings indicate that while the Lake Drive
East pavement has reached the end of its serviceable life, the Great Plains Boulevard pavement remain s in moderately good condition with a
sound base structure.
To address these varying conditions, the proposed City Project No. 26-02 includes a combination of full-depth reclamation (FDR) and mill and
overlay improvements:
• Lake Drive East will undergo full-depth reclamation to re-stabilize the pavement structure, improve drainage, and provide a uniform
base while maintaining existing curb and gutter.
• Great Plains Boulevard, from the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Drive East northward, will receive a 2.0 -inch mill
and overlay. This treatment will restore ride quality and surface drainage without full base reconstruction, offering the mo st cost-
effective solution for this corridor.
Additional project improvements include replacement of non-compliant pedestrian ramps, spot sidewalk reconstruction, select curb and gutter
replacement, and installation of new signage and pavement markings in accordance with MUTCD standards. These upgrade s will enhance
accessibility, safety, and consistency with City design standards.
An Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) was completed in September 2025 for the intersection of Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard.
Alternatives considered included maintaining two-way stop control, conversion to all-way stop control, and construction of a mini or single-lane
roundabout. The evaluation identified the All-Way Stop Control (AWSC) and Mini-Roundabout as the top two performing options. Both
alternatives provide substantial safety improvements (up to 70 percent crash reduction potential ) with minimal construction impacts and no
right-of-way acquisition required.
The Mini-Roundabout offers slightly improved operational performance and pedestrian safety compared to the all-way stop control, while the
All-Way Stop achieves comparable safety benefits at significantly lower cost. Either alternative would meet the City’s operational and safety
objectives for this intersection, and both are considered viable improvement options for implementation as part of Project 26 -02.
The estimated total project cost is $1,306,800 for the All-Way Stop alternative and $1,688,500 for the mini roundabout alternative, which
includes construction, contingency, engineering, and administrative expenses. Funding is proposed through a combination of Ci ty Pavement
Management Program (PMP) funds, municipal state aid, and special assessments to benefiting properties in accordance with the City’s
adopted assessment policy, which allocates 40 percent of street improvement costs to the adjacent parcels. No right-of-way acquisition is
anticipated.
Based on the findings contained in this report, the Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard Rehabilitation Project is feas ible, necessary,
and cost-effective from an engineering standpoint. The improvements will restore structural condition, enhance pedestrian accessibility, and
align with the City’s strategic priorities of asset management and financial sustainability. Construction is anticipated to begin in Summer of
2026, following design authorization and bid award.
150
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 2
PROJECT NEED AND PURPOSE
The City of Chanhassen’s Pavement Management Program (PMP) provides a data -driven framework to maintain and extend the life of the
City’s street network through timely rehabilitation, reconstruction, and preservation projects. Each year, the City evaluates pavement
condition, maintenance history, and coordination opportunities with other infrastructure to prioritize improvements that preserve roadway
function and minimize life-cycle cost.
Based on the most recent pavement condition inventory and field inspections, Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard were identified as
priority corridors for rehabilitation in the 2026 construction program. Together, these streets serve a mix of commercial, institutional, and local
access traffic, providing key connectivity between Hidden Valley neighborhood, Highway 5, and the surrounding business park area.
Pavement condition ratings reveal a clear difference in structural health between the two corridors:
• Lake Drive East exhibits Pavement Condition Index (PCI) values in the low 40s, with widespread fatigue cracking, joint deteri oration,
and localized base failures. These conditions signify that the pavement has reached the end of its service life and requir es full-depth
reclamation (FDR) to restore structural integrity.
• Great Plains Boulevard exhibits PCI values in the low-to-mid 60s, showing surface oxidation and moderate cracking but a stable
base. A 2.0-inch mill and overlay will address surface aging while preserving the existing pavement structure.
In addition to pavement rehabilitation, several related improvements are needed to meet current City and ADA standards:
• Pedestrian Accessibility and Sidewalk Condition: Numerous sidewalk panels throughout the project area show cracking, spalling, or
settlement. These panels will be replaced to restore continuity and compliance with ADA cross-slope and surface requirements.
• Commercial Driveways: Many existing commercial driveways do not fully meet current City geometric or ADA accessibility standards.
These will be reconstructed or regraded to meet City standard driveway apron design and accessible sidewalk transitions.
• Curb and Gutter / Drainage: Spot curb and gutter replacement is warranted where settlement or cracking impedes surface draina ge
or creates ponding.
• Storm Sewer Structures: Several catch basins and manholes include aging or non-standard castings that no longer meet the City’s
preferred inlet and maintenance standards. These will be replaced or adjusted to grade to ensure uniformity, improved hydraulic
performance, and safer maintenance access.
• Gate Valve Boxes: Existing gate valve boxes will be adjusted to final surface grade during construction to maintain accessibi lity and
alignment with the finished pavement surface.
• Intersection Safety: The intersection of Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard exhibits operational and driver-expectation issues
common to two-way stop-controlled intersections. An Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE), see Appendix identified All-Way Stop
Control (AWSC) and a Mini-Roundabout as the most effective safety and operational alternatives.
In summary, the Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard Rehabilitation Project will restore pavement condition, improve ac cessibility,
update drainage and utility appurtenances, and enhance intersection safety. The improvements are necessary, cost -effective, and feasible,
consistent with Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 and the City’s long -term asset management objectives.
151
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 3
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The proposed improvements for City Project No. 26-02 – Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard Rehabilitation include pavement
rehabilitation, storm sewer structure upgrades, utility adjustments, and intersection safety improvements. The project has be en designed to
align with the City’s Pavement Management Program (PMP), accessibility goals, and infrastructure standards.
Streets
Lake Drive East – Full-Depth Reclamation (FDR)
Lake Drive East will be rehabilitated using a full-depth reclamation (FDR) process. Field observations and pavement cores indicate severe
cracking, base failures, and structural degradation.
Under FDR, the existing bituminous pavement and a portion of the underlying aggregate base will be pulverized, blended, and r e-compacted in
place to create a uniform stabilized base. The reclaimed base will then be paved with two new bituminous layers 2” Bituminous Non-Wear
Course (SPNWB330C) and 2” Bituminous Wear Course (SPWEA340C). Key benefits of FDR include improved cross-slope, uniform structure,
and reduced cost compared to full reconstruction. Curb and gutter will remain in place except where replac ement is required due to
settlement, cracking, or drainage deficiencies.
A field review of the concrete curb and gutter identified a significant number of sections with damaged lip edges, surface sp alling, or
deterioration at the joint. While the extent of deterioration warrants numerous spot replacements, the overall curb condition remains
serviceable, with the majority of segments structurally sound and properly aligned.
To confirm the most cost-effective approach, we analyzed historical unit bid prices from previous pavement rehabilitation projects for both
spot curb replacement and complete curb removal and replacement. This review found that full curb replacement becomes more co st-
effective only when spot replacement quantities reach approximately 55 percent or more of the total curb length. The current project
anticipates replacing roughly 28 percent of the total curb, making spot replacement the more economical and pra ctical option.
Great Plains Boulevard – 2.0-Inch Mill and Overlay
From Lake Drive East northward to the project limits, Great Plains Boulevard remains structurally sound but shows surface oxi dation and
transverse cracking. A 2.0-inch mill and overlay will remove the oxidized surface and replace it with new bituminous pavement, restoring ride
quality and extending service life by 10–15 years.
Spot curb replacement will be performed at drainage low points or where settlement exists. Pavement markings and traffic cont rol devices will
be reinstalled in accordance with MUTCD standards following paving.
Sidewalks and ADA Improvements
Numerous sidewalk panels within the project area are cracked, spalled, or settled. These panels will be removed and replaced to eliminate
tripping hazards and meet ADA cross-slope requirements. All pedestrian curb ramps will be reconstructed to comply with ADA/PROWAG
standards, including proper ramp slopes, detectable warning panels, and landing areas.
Commercial Driveways
Several commercial driveways along both corridors do not meet current City or ADA standards for grades or sidewalk transition s. These will be
reconstructed or regraded to meet the City’s standard driveway apron geometry and provide accessible pedestrian cr ossings across driveway
aprons.
Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE)
An Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) was completed at the Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard intersection to asse ss safety and
operational performance, see summary table 1. The ICE found that both All-Way Stop Control (AWSC) and a Mini-Roundabout provide
substantial crash-reduction potential (up to 70%) with no right-of-way impacts. The mini-roundabout offers slightly better pedestrian safety and
operational efficiency, while the AWSC is significantly more cost-effective.
Both alternatives are considered feasible for construction, and the preferred option will be determined during final design i n coordination with
City Council.
152
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 4
Table 1. MnDOT Intersection Control Evaluation Summary – Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd
Evaluation Criteria Existing Two-Way Stop
Control (TWSC)
All-Way Stop Control
(AWSC)
Mini-Roundabout Single-Lane Roundabout
Safety Performance Existing crash rate ≈ 0.30
crashes/MEV (≈ 1.5
crashes/yr); baseline for
comparison.
Up to 70% Reduction Up to 70% Reduction Up to 40% Reduction
Operations (LOS/Delay) LOS B overall; side-street
delay > 20 s at peak.
LOS A–B overall;
balanced control.
LOS A overall; minimal
queuing.
LOS A overall; optimal flow.
Traffic Volume Suitability Adequate for current
volumes (~7,500 ADT).
Within MnDOT AWSC
limits (≤ 9,000 ADT).
Within mini-roundabout
capacity (≤ 10,000 ADT).
Within roundabout capacity (≤ 15,000 ADT).
Pedestrian / Bicycle Safety Limited gaps; poor
visibility.
Improved pedestrian
yielding; reduced
approach speed.
Good pedestrian safety;
short crossing distances.
Excellent; lowest pedestrian exposure.
Right-of-Way Impacts None. None. None. Moderate (≈ 20–30 ft widening per corner).
Construction Cost (Est.) Minimal (< $5 k). ≈ $15 k (signing +
marking).
≈ $350k ≈ $700k–$800k
Maintenance / Lifecycle
Cost
Low. Low. Moderate (curb & plow
complexity).
Moderate-High (landscaping & snow
removal).
Implementation
Complexity
None – existing layout. Removal of traffic
lanes, simple signing
& marking.
Moderate – curb mods &
drainage adjustments,
reduces impervious
surface.
High – full reconstruction & stormwater
treatment and permitting (increase in
impervious)
Safety Benefit / Cost Ratio — (baseline) ≈ 5 : 1 (high benefit /
low cost)
≈ 2.5 : 1 ≈ 0.6 : 1
153
154
155
156
157
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 5
Pavement Markings and Signage
All pavement markings and signage will be replaced to conform to current City and MUTCD standards. Existing regulatory and wa rning signs
will be updated to meet reflectivity and mounting requirements. New all-way stop signage and “ALL WAY” plaques will be installed if that
intersection alternative is selected.
Storm Sewer
The existing storm sewer system is generally in good condition; however, several structures and castings are outdated or non -standard.
Improvements include:
• Replacement of aging catch basin and manhole castings with City-standard frames and lids.
• Adjustment of storm structures to match new finished surface elevations following pavement reclamation and overlay.
Sanitary Sewer
No sanitary sewer improvements are proposed as part of this project. Existing sanitary sewer manholes are located outside the pavement
rehabilitation area, and field inspection confirmed that there are no operational issues or deficiencies with the underly ing sanitary sewer main
crossing the project corridor. The existing system will remain in place and functional during and after construction.
Water Main
No new water main construction is anticipated. Existing watermain infrastructure will remain in place and be protected during construction.
Minor appurtenance work will include:
• Adjustment of existing gate valve boxes to match new pavement elevations.
• Replacement of non-standard valve box lids with City-standard components as needed.
• Coordination with City staff to confirm valve accessibility and protection during pavement reclamation and overlay operations .
Private Utilities
Private utilities within the corridor include gas, electric, communications, and fiber optic infrastructure. No relocations a re anticipated;
however, coordination will occur with each private utility prior to construction to identify potential conflicts and protect existing infrastructure.
Coordination typically includes adjusting structures to grade, installing protective sleeves over shallow conduits, and verif ying clearances
during reclamation and milling operations.
Street Lighting:
The existing roadway lighting system along Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard is owned and maintained by the City of Chanhassen.
The lighting infrastructure has exceeded its useful life and consists of direct-bury wire and non-standard fixtures. The City, under a separate
contract and in coordination with Xcel Energy, will replace the street lighting infrastructure with a new conduit -fed system and upgraded
fixtures to meet current efficiency, maintenance, and illumination standards. This lighting replacement will be designed to complement the
pavement rehabilitation project and minimize disruption during construction.
Construction Limits and Traffic Control
The construction will remain within the existing curb lines and public right-of-way, except for localized sidewalk and ramp reconstruction areas.
158
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 6
Temporary lane closures and staging will be required to maintain business access, and detailed traffic control plans will be developed during
final design in coordination with affected property owners.
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
The following summarizes the engineer’s opinion of probable construction cost for the proposed improvements associated with City Project
No. 26-02 – Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard Rehabilitation.
Costs are based on preliminary quantities and recent bid pricing from comparable City and regional projects. A 10 -percent contingency has
been added to reflect the design development stage of the project, and non-construction costs such as engineering design, construction
administration, materials testing, and administrative expenses are included as a separate line item.
Construction Cost Summary
Table 2: Construction Cost Summary – All Way Stop Control Option
Improvement Category Estimated Construction Cost
Streets $913,500
Storm Sewer $15,700
Sanitary Sewer $0
Water Main $5,000
Estimated Construction Subtotal $929,200
Contingency (10%) $92,900
Subtotal – Construction and Contingency $1,022,100
Engineering, Administration, and Testing $284,700
Total Estimated Project Cost ≈ $1,306,800
Table 3: Construction Cost Summary – Mini Roundabout Option
Improvement Category Estimated Construction Cost
Streets $1,255,500
Storm Sewer $15,700
Sanitary Sewer $0
Water Main $5,000
Estimated Construction Subtotal $1,276,200
Contingency (10%) $127,600
Subtotal – Construction and Contingency $1,404,000
Engineering, Administration, and Testing $284,700
Total Estimated Project Cost ≈ $1,688,500
Discussion
The total estimated project cost of approximately $1.69 million represents the combined investment required to complete the proposed
street, storm sewer, and utility adjustments.
Key cost components include:
• Full-Depth Reclamation (Lake Drive East): The largest single cost item, driven primarily by the inclusion of a full 4-inch bituminous
pavement section consisting of a 2-inch non-wear course (SPNWB330C) and a 2-inch wear course (SPWEA340C). This treatment
fully restores the pavement structure through in-place recycling of existing materials and placement of new bituminous layers,
resulting in a long-term structural improvement.
• Mill and Overlay (Great Plains Boulevard): Cost-effective preservation treatment addressing surface wear while maintaining the
existing base.
• Sidewalk and ADA Upgrades: Replacement of deteriorated panels and non -compliant ramps to meet City and federal accessibility
standards.
159
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 7
• Storm Sewer and Casting Replacement: Replacement of aging castings and adjustments to grade, providing uniform City -standard
components.
• Intersection Improvements: Implementation of either All-Way Stop Control (AWSC) or Mini-Roundabout at Lake Drive East and Great
Plains Boulevard. Both are feasible within the existing right-of-way; the cost estimate reflects the AWSC configuration.
All costs are expressed in anticipated 2026 dollars and include labor, materials, equipment, mobilization, traffic control, turf restoration, and
erosion control. Actual construction costs will depend on final design, bidding climate, and material pricing at the time of award.
FINANCING AND ASSESSMENTS
Financing Overview
The estimated total project cost of approximately $1,306,800 will be funded through a combination of the City’s Pavement Management
Program Fund (PMP), Municipal State Aid funds, special assessments, and utility enterprise funds for minor water and storm sewer work.
Funding Sources and Allocation
Funding for City Project 26-02 is proposed to be divided among the following sources:
Funding Source Estimated Amount
Municipal State Aid $992,420
Special Assessments $675,380
Sanitary -
Water $5,000
Surface Water $15,700
Total Estimated Project Cost $1,688,500
Per the City’s assessment practice, 40 percent (40%) of the eligible street improvement costs are proposed to be assessed to benefiting
properties, with the remaining costs funded by the City through the PMP and applicable utility enterprise funds. The Cit y’s assessment policy,
last updated May 5, 2025, did not materially alter commercial assessment procedures but reaffirmed that each project may requ ire case-by-
case review to ensure fairness and proportional benefit among commercial parcels.
Assessment Process and Application
Overview
The City of Chanhassen prepared a special assessment roll for the 2026 Lake Drive East Rehabilitation Project (City Project N o. 26-02) in
accordance with the City’s Assessment Policy (May 2025) and Minnesota Statutes § 429.051–.061. Assessments recover a portion of project
costs from properties that receive a direct and special benefit from the roadway improvements. The project rehabilitates Lake Drive East
between Highway 5 and Great Plains Boulevard, serving an entirely commercial and institutional corrid or. All parcels are non-Type 1 (i.e., not
single-family residential), so the City evaluated three potential assessment methodologies to ensure fairness and consistency with past
practice:
1. Frontage-Based Assessment
2. Trip-Based Assessment
3. Area-Based Assessment (Past City Practice)
Each method is permitted under Minnesota law, but their applicability and equity vary depending on parcel configuration, land use intensity,
and access characteristics.
Policy Basis
Under the City’s policy we calculated assessment under the following assumptions:
160
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 8
• All benefiting parcels—including commercial, institutional, and publicly owned sites—may be assessed if they gain measurable benefit
in access, functionality, or market value.
• Forty percent (40%) of the eligible street construction cost is designated assessable.
• Utility rehabilitation is funded from utility or general funds and are not assessable.
• For Type 2 parcels, benefit may be allocated using one of two approved methods:
o Trip-Based Method – Assessments proportional to estimated daily vehicle trips derived from the ITE Trip Generation
Manual, 12th Edition, adjusted for corridor usage based on the project’s Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE).
o Area-Based Method (Historic Practice) – Assessments proportional to parcel area (square footage or acres) within the
defined benefit zone, reflecting long-term accessibility and development potential.
The final method will be selected by City Council following review of project conditions and equity among benefiting parcels.
Frontage-Based Assessment
A front-foot method allocates assessments proportionally to each parcel’s linear frontage along the improved roadway. While common for
residential neighborhoods, it is less appropriate for this corridor due to:
• Irregular and Unequal Frontages: Several parcels have extensive frontage (multi-building or corner sites), while others gain full
access through shared driveways or cross-access easements but technically have no direct frontage.
• Disconnection Between Frontage and Benefit: Some large parcels with limited access points would be over-assessed, while smaller,
high-traffic sites would be under-assessed.
• Functional Nature of Benefit: The project’s improvements provide corridor-wide operational and safety benefits, not parcel-specific
frontage enhancements.
For these reasons, a frontage-based allocation would not proportionally reflect special benefit and is not recommended.
Area Based Assessment (Past City Practice)
Historically, the City of Chanhassen has assessed commercial and institutional corridors based on land area (square footage o r acres) within
the defined benefit zone. Under this method, benefit is presumed to relate to the parcel’s overall development potential, size, and long-term
accessibility to the improved corridor.
Advantages of the area-based approach include:
• Consistency with Past City Practice: Provides continuity with prior assessment rolls for similar commercial corridors.
• Predictable and Transparent Allocation: Larger parcels with greater development potential contribute proportionally more, while
smaller parcels pay less.
• Reduced Reliance on Traffic Data: Suitable where land use intensities are stable and trip data is limited.
Considerations include:
• Variable Land Use Intensity: Some large parcels generate fewer trips than smaller, high -turnover sites, which may reduce the direct
link between use and benefit.
• Future Redevelopment: Parcel area may reflect long-term potential rather than current use, which can be viewed as either an
advantage or a drawback depending on Council intent.
The area-based method remains a defensible and practical option, consistent with past City assessments, and may provide a balanced
outcome where frontage and access vary widely.
Trip-Based Assessment
The trip-generation method allocates benefit according to each parcel’s estimated traffic generation, using data from the ITE Trip Generation
Manual (12th Edition) and adjusted for the percentage of trips using Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard. Trip generation estimates
were developed using available land use information, ITE reference data, and local engineering judgment. Specific traffic counts were not
161
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 9
collected for individual parcels. Instead, corridor-level traffic volumes were estimated from recent traffic counts at the Lake Drive East and
Great Plains Boulevard intersection and historical traffic data from nearby Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boul evard segments. These
estimates are intended to represent a reasonable and proportional distribution of use among benefiting parcels for assessment purposes.
Calculation:
Daily vehicle trips are converted into Residential Equivalent Units (REUs) where one REU = 10 daily trips:
𝑅𝐸𝑈𝑠=(Daily Trips × % of Trips Using Corridor)
10
The total assessable cost is divided by total REUs to determine the assessment rate ($/REU).
Assessment Rate and Application
The total REUs for all benefiting parcels were summed, and the assessment rate ($ / REU) was established by dividing the tota l assessable
cost by the total REUs.
Each parcel’s assessment equals:
Assessment ($) = Parcel REUs × Rate ($ / REU)
For example, a total assessable cost of $675,380 divided by 1,539 REUs yields an assessment rate of $438.99 per REU. A parcel generating
1,000 daily trips (100 REUs) would be assessed approximately $43,899.00. Parcels with shared access or internal driveways would have
REUs distributed proportionally based on each parcel’s estimated traffic contribution.
Assessment Summary Table
Method Basis of Allocation Advantages Considerations/Limitations
Frontage-Based Linear Frontage Simple to apply
Not equitable for parcels with
shared access or no direct
frontage
Trip-Based Estimated daily vehicle trips Reflects roadway usage and
intensity
Requires assumptions and
engineering judgement
Area-Based Parcel Area
Consistent with past City
practices; simple and
transparent
May not fully represent traffic
intensity
Assessment Conclusion
Both the Trip-Based and Area-Based allocation methods provide reasonable and legally defensible means of distributing the assessable cost
of $675,380 among the benefiting commercial and institutional parcels. Each method has strengths and limitations depending on how closely
its underlying metric (traffic generation or land area) aligns with measurable benefit.
The Trip-Based method assigns costs according to estimated daily vehicle trips derived from ITE data, adjusted for corridor use. While this
method reflects roadway utilization, it introduces variability due to the reliance on generalized trip generation rates and a ssumptions regarding
internal traffic patterns. As shown in the preliminary assessment roll, several parcels with low daily trip generation —such as churches or
municipal uses—would receive relatively low assessments, while larger retail parcels with higher traffic volumes would bear a significantly
higher share of the project cost.
The Area-Based method, which has been the City’s historic practice for similar commercial corridors, distributes costs in proportion to parcel
size. This approach results in a more consistent and predictable allocation across properties and generally reflects long -term accessibility and
development potential. The comparison of methods indicates that the Area-Based assessment yields fewer extreme variations between
parcels, particularly for institutional or shared-access sites where frontage or traffic data may not accurately represent benefit.
Based on the analysis, both methods meet the statutory requirement that assessments be commensurate with special benefit. However,
considering:
162
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 10
• The corridor’s mixed commercial and institutional character;
• The presence of shared and indirect access arrangements; and
• The City’s historic reliance on area-based assessments for similar projects;
it may be appropriate to apply an Area-Based assessment methodology for the final assessment roll.
This method provides continuity with past City practice, aligns with the character of the benefiting properties, and results in a more balanced
distribution of cost while maintaining defensibility under Minnesota Statutes § 429.051. The final assessment methodology will be
determined through coordination with City staff and City Council during the assessment hearing process. Adjustments may be made as part of
the final roll to ensure equitable treatment among all benefiting parcels.
163
Lake
D
ri
v
e
E
a
s
t
Minnes
o
t
a
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
5
Great Plains BlvdLake DrivePond Promenade
Marsh DrH
i
d
d
e
n
C
t
Hidden
L
a
n
e
Lake Drive
Main StreetPond Promenade
Po
n
d
P
r
om
e
n
a
d
e
103 105
104
106
107
109
108
100
101
110
102
112
Silo Buildings LLCPID: 258560020
CHCR LLCPID: 258560010
VOP I LLCPID: 258330030
Lakewinds Natural Foods CooperativePID: 257690010
CH Retail Fund/MPLS Village Shoppes LLC
PID: 257650020
CPEC Exchange 39560 & 39561 LLCPID: 253460010
New Horizon Real Estate Dvlmt 6 LLPPID: 253460020
DOC-300 Lake Drive East Mob LLC
PID: 255900010
American Legion - ChanhassenPID: 255900020
Bongard's Creameries
PID: 253451110
Chanhassen HRAPID: 253451111
Discovery United Methodist ChurchPID: 253451120
111
Charter Bank
PID: 257650010
0.94 Acres
1.19 Acres
1.34 Acres
0.75 Acres
0.46 Acres
1.40 Acres
1.34 Acres 0.58 Acres
3.46 Acres
2.11 Acres
4.20 Acres
0.64 Acres
3.56 Acres
114
115
118
116
121
125
123
122
113
117
120
119
124
Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc
PID: 258680040
3.96 Acres
Pond Promenade Ventures LLCPID: 2578300200.93 Acres
Pond Promenade Ventures LLCPID: 257830010
1.78 Acres
Wheatstone Restaurant Group
PID: 258620010 1.37 Acres
Villages on the PondsPID: 258460020
1.40 Acres
Suraj Hospitality LLCPID: 258680010
2.14 Acres
Mara Sports Marketing LLC
PID: 258460010
0.66 Acres
Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc
PID: 258680030
3.35 Acres
PHM/Chanhassen Inc
PID: 258380010
5.11 Acres
Church of St. HubertPID: 2584400201.88 Acres
Store Master Funding VI LLCPID: 2584400100.56 Acres
Church of St. HubertPID: 2586800209.28 Acres
Church of St. HubertPID: 258680130
1.31 AcresMa
r
k
e
t
B
l
v
d
(C
o
u
n
t
y
R
d
1
0
1
)
La
k
e
D
r
i
v
e
ISGInc.comArchitecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning
DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\33000 PROJ\33000-33099\33064 2026 LAKE DRIVE E REHAB PROJEC- CHANHASSEN MN\33064 PRODUCTION FILES\33064 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\CONCEPTS-EXHIBITS\33064 ASSESSMENT ROLL 2.DWG SAVED BY: JAKE.GUZIK
CITY PROJECT NO. 26-02
ISG PROJECT NO. 25-33064
2026 Lake Dr Rehabilitation Project
Chanhassen, Minnesota - 10/20/2025
Sheet Number 1 of 1
Assessment Exhibit
N0
SCALE IN FEET
150 300
LEGEND
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
ASSESSMENT AREA
PROPERTY NUMBER1XX
164
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project - Preliminary Assessment Roll
Trip Based
Assessable
Street Cost:
675,380.00$
Baseline: 10 trips = 1 REU
Rate per REU =284.55$
Property
Number P.I.D. Taxpayer Taxpayer Address Property Address Land Use Code (ITE)
Assessable
Trips REUs Assessment
100 258560020 Silo Buildings LLC 3561 44th St W Minneapolis, MN 55410 420 440 Pond Promenade Multi-tenant Retail 1750 175 49,796.25$
101 258560010 CHCR LLC PO Box 1038 Mason City, IA 50402 450 Pond Promenade Fast Food w/Drive Thru 1250 125 35,568.75$
102 257690010 Lakewinds Natural Foods Cooperative 6321 Bury Dr Ste 21 Ste 100 Eden Prairie, MN 55346 435 Pond Promenade Retail Supermarket 2550 255 72,560.25$
103 253460010 CPEC Exchange 39560 & 39561 LLC 12 Blue Jay Ln N North Oaks, MN 55127 320 380 Lake Dr E Multi-tenant Retail 2150 215 61,178.25$
104 255900010 Doc-300 Lake Drive East Mob LLC 309 N Water St Ste 500 Milwaukee, WI 53202 300 Lake Dr E Medical Office 1500 150 42,682.50$
105 253460020 New Horizon Real Estate Dvlmt 6 LLP 3405 Annapolis Ln N #100 Minneapolis, MN 55447 310 Lake Dr E Day Care Center 650 65 18,495.75$
106 255900020 American Legion - Chanhassen 290 Lake Dr E Chanhassen, MN 55317 290 Lake Dr E Assembly/Restaurant 900 90 25,609.50$
107 253451110 Bongards' Creameries 250 Lake Dr Chanhassen, MN 55317 250 Lake Dr E Industrial Office 1625 162.5 46,239.38$
108 253451120 Discovery United Methodist Church 275 Lake Dr E Chanhassen, MN 55317 275 Lake Dr E Church 760 76 21,625.80$
109 253451111 Chanhassen HRA PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Public Access 150 15 4,268.25$
110 258330030 VOP I LLC PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Shared Parking Lot 400 40 11,382.00$
111 257650010 Charter Bank 1010 W Clairemont Ave Eau Claire, WI 54701 455 Pond Promenade Bank 700 70 19,918.50$
112 257650020 CH Retail Fund/MPLS Village Shoppes LLC 3819 Maple Ave Dallas, TX 75219 460 464 Lake Dr Shopping Center 1000 100 28,455.00$
113 258680030 Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc. PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Private Road 2000 200 56,910.00$
114 258680010 Suraj Hospitality LLC 570 Pond Promenade Chanhassen, MN 55317 570 Pond Promenade Hotel 600 60 17,073.00$
115 258620010 Wheatstone Restaurant Group 600 Market St Ste 230, Chanhassen, MN 55317 530 Pond Promenade Restaurant 550 55 15,650.25$
116 257830010 Pond Promenade Ventures LLC 705 Marquette Ave S Ste 900, Minneapolis, MN 55402 510 Lake Dr Free Standing Store 850 85 24,186.75$
117 257830020 Pond Promenade Ventures LLC 705 Marquette Ave S Ste 900, Minneapolis, MN 55402 Private Road/Parking Lot 150 15 4,268.25$
118 258460010 Mara Sports Marketing LLC 3728 Woodland Cove Pkwy Minnetrista, MN 55331 550 Lake Dr Day Care Center 650 65 18,495.75$
119 258460020 Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc. PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317
Private Drive/Storm
Detention 50 5 1,422.75$
120 258680040 Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc. PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Storm Detention Pond 0 0 -$
121 258380010 PHM/Chanhassen Inc 2845 Hamline Ave N, Roseville, MN 55113 501 Lake Dr
Continuing Care
Retirement Community 500 50 14,227.50$
122 258440010 Store Master Funding VI LLC 10050 Crosstown Cir Ste 650 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 421 Lake Dr Commercial Rec Indoor 350 35 9,959.25$
123 258680020 Church of St. Hubert 8201 Main St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 8201 Main St Church/School 2000 200 56,910.00$
124 258440020 Church of St. Hubert 8201 Main St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Parking Lot 350 35 9,959.25$
125 258680130 Church of St. Hubert 8201 Main St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Parking Lot 300 30 8,536.50$
23735 675,380.00$
165
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project - Preliminary Assessment Roll
Area-Based
Assessabl
e Street
Cost:
675,380.00$
Rate per Acre =13,347.43$
Property
Number P.I.D. Taxpayer Taxpayer Address Property Address
Assessable
Area Assessment Notes
100 258560020 Silo Buildings LLC 3561 44th St W Minneapolis, MN 55410 420 440 Pond Promenade 1.19 15,883.44$
101 258560010 CHCR LLC PO Box 1038 Mason City, IA 50402 450 Pond Promenade 0.94 12,546.58$
102 257690010 Lakewinds Natural Foods Cooperative 6321 Bury Dr Ste 21 Ste 100 Eden Prairie, MN 55346 435 Pond Promenade 1.34 17,885.56$
103 253460010 CPEC Exchange 39560 & 39561 LLC 12 Blue Jay Ln N North Oaks, MN 55127 320 380 Lake Dr E 1.34 17,885.56$
104 255900010 Doc-300 Lake Drive East Mob LLC 309 N Water St Ste 500 Milwaukee, WI 53202 300 Lake Dr E 3.46 46,182.11$
105 253460020 New Horizon Real Estate Dvlmt 6 LLP 3405 Annapolis Ln N #100 Minneapolis, MN 55447 310 Lake Dr E 0.58 7,741.51$
106 255900020 American Legion - Chanhassen 290 Lake Dr E Chanhassen, MN 55317 290 Lake Dr E 2.11 28,163.08$
107 253451110 Bongards' Creameries 250 Lake Dr Chanhassen, MN 55317 250 Lake Dr E 4.20 56,059.21$
108 253451120 Discovery United Methodist Church 275 Lake Dr E Chanhassen, MN 55317 275 Lake Dr E 3.56 47,516.85$
109 253451111 Chanhassen HRA PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 0.64 8,542.36$
110 258330030 VOP I LLC PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 0.75 10,010.57$
111 257650010 Charter Bank 1010 W Clairemont Ave Eau Claire, WI 54701 455 Pond Promenade 0.46 6,139.82$
112 257650020 CH Retail Fund/MPLS Village Shoppes LLC 3819 Maple Ave Dallas, TX 75219 460 464 Lake Dr 1.40 18,686.40$
113 258680030 Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc. PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 3.35 44,713.89$
114 258680010 Suraj Hospitality LLC 570 Pond Promenade Chanhassen, MN 55317 570 Pond Promenade 2.14 28,563.50$
115 258620010 Wheatstone Restaurant Group 600 Market St Ste 230, Chanhassen, MN 55317 530 Pond Promenade 1.37 18,285.98$
116 257830010 Pond Promenade Ventures LLC 705 Marquette Ave S Ste 900, Minneapolis, MN 55402 510 Lake Dr 1.78 23,758.43$
117 257830020 Pond Promenade Ventures LLC 705 Marquette Ave S Ste 900, Minneapolis, MN 55402 0.93 12,413.11$
118 258460010 Mara Sports Marketing LLC 3728 Woodland Cove Pkwy Minnetrista, MN 55331 550 Lake Dr 0.66 8,809.30$
119 258460020 Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc. PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 0.26 3,470.33$ Private drive & storm pond
120 258680040 Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc. PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 0.00 -$
Detention Pond Not Included
in Assessment
121 258380010 PHM/Chanhassen Inc 2845 Hamline Ave N, Roseville, MN 55113 501 Lake Dr 5.11 68,205.37$
122 258440010 Store Master Funding VI LLC 10050 Crosstown Cir Ste 650 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 421 Lake Dr 0.56 7,474.56$
123 258680020 Church of St. Hubert 8201 Main St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 8201 Main St 9.28 123,864.15$
124 258440020 Church of St. Hubert 8201 Main St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 1.88 25,093.17$
125 258680130 Church of St. Hubert 8201 Main St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 1.31 17,485.13$
50.6 675,380.00$
166
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project - Preliminary Assessment Roll
Trip-Base vs. Area-Based
Assessable Street
Cost: 675,380.00$
Property Number P.I.D. Taxpayer Taxpayer Address Property Address
Trips Based Area Based
Change
(Trip vs. Area)
100 258560020 Silo Buildings LLC 3561 44th St W Minneapolis, MN 55410 420 440 Pond Promenade 49,796.25$ 15,883.44$ 33,912.81$
101 258560010 CHCR LLC PO Box 1038 Mason City, IA 50402 450 Pond Promenade 35,568.75$ 12,546.58$ 23,022.17$
102 257690010 Lakewinds Natural Foods Cooperative 6321 Bury Dr Ste 21 Ste 100 Eden Prairie, MN 55346 435 Pond Promenade 72,560.25$ 17,885.56$ 54,674.69$
103 253460010 CPEC Exchange 39560 & 39561 LLC 12 Blue Jay Ln N North Oaks, MN 55127 320 380 Lake Dr E 61,178.25$ 17,885.56$ 43,292.69$
104 255900010 Doc-300 Lake Drive East Mob LLC 309 N Water St Ste 500 Milwaukee, WI 53202 300 Lake Dr E 42,682.50$ 46,182.11$ (3,499.61)$
105 253460020 New Horizon Real Estate Dvlmt 6 LLP 3405 Annapolis Ln N #100 Minneapolis, MN 55447 310 Lake Dr E 18,495.75$ 7,741.51$ 10,754.24$
106 255900020 American Legion - Chanhassen 290 Lake Dr E Chanhassen, MN 55317 290 Lake Dr E 25,609.50$ 28,163.08$ (2,553.58)$
107 253451110 Bongards' Creameries 250 Lake Dr Chanhassen, MN 55317 250 Lake Dr E 46,239.38$ 56,059.21$ (9,819.83)$
108 253451120 Discovery United Methodist Church 275 Lake Dr E Chanhassen, MN 55317 275 Lake Dr E 21,625.80$ 47,516.85$ (25,891.05)$
109 253451111 Chanhassen HRA PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 0 4,268.25$ 8,542.36$ (4,274.11)$
110 258330030 VOP I LLC PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 0 11,382.00$ 10,010.57$ 1,371.43$
111 257650010 Charter Bank 1010 W Clairemont Ave Eau Claire, WI 54701 455 Pond Promenade 19,918.50$ 6,139.82$ 13,778.68$
112 257650020 CH Retail Fund/MPLS Village Shoppes LLC 3819 Maple Ave Dallas, TX 75219 460 464 Lake Dr 28,455.00$ 18,686.40$ 9,768.60$
113 258680030 Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc. PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 0 56,910.00$ 44,713.89$ 12,196.11$
114 258680010 Suraj Hospitality LLC 570 Pond Promenade Chanhassen, MN 55317 570 Pond Promenade 17,073.00$ 28,563.50$ (11,490.50)$
115 258620010 Wheatstone Restaurant Group 600 Market St Ste 230, Chanhassen, MN 55317 530 Pond Promenade 15,650.25$ 18,285.98$ (2,635.73)$
116 257830010 Pond Promenade Ventures LLC 705 Marquette Ave S Ste 900, Minneapolis, MN 55402 510 Lake Dr 24,186.75$ 23,758.43$ 428.32$
117 257830020 Pond Promenade Ventures LLC 705 Marquette Ave S Ste 900, Minneapolis, MN 55402 0 4,268.25$ 12,413.11$ (8,144.86)$
118 258460010 Mara Sports Marketing LLC 3728 Woodland Cove Pkwy Minnetrista, MN 55331 550 Lake Dr 18,495.75$ 8,809.30$ 9,686.45$
119 258460020 Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc. PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 0 1,422.75$ 3,470.33$ (2,047.58)$
120 258680040 Villages on the Ponds Assn Inc. PO Box 404 Chanhassen, MN 55317 0 -$ -$ -$
121 258380010 PHM/Chanhassen Inc 2845 Hamline Ave N, Roseville, MN 55113 501 Lake Dr 14,227.50$ 68,205.37$ (53,977.87)$
122 258440010 Store Master Funding VI LLC 10050 Crosstown Cir Ste 650 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 421 Lake Dr 9,959.25$ 7,474.56$ 2,484.69$
123 258680020 Church of St. Hubert 8201 Main St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 8201 Main St 56,910.00$ 123,864.15$ (66,954.15)$
124 258440020 Church of St. Hubert 8201 Main St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 0 9,959.25$ 25,093.17$ (15,133.92)$
125 258680130 Church of St. Hubert 8201 Main St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 0 8,536.50$ 17,485.13$ (8,948.63)$
675,380.00$ 675,380.00$
167
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 11
SCHEDULE
Milestone Date
Accept Feasibility Report; Call Public Hearing October 27, 2025
Neighboorhood Project Open House October 30, 2025
Feasiblity Hearing & Order Project November 10, 2025
City Council Approves Plan & Authorizes Ad for Bid January 12, 2026
Bid Opening February 4, 2026
Call Assessment Hearing February 9, 2026
Neighborhood Meeting February 11, 2026
Assessment Hearing; Award Contract February 23, 2026
Start Construction May 11, 2026
Substantial Completion October 2, 2026
Final Completion June 11, 2027
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
A. Overview
Public engagement for the Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard Rehabilitation Project (City Project No. 26-02) included both online and
in-person opportunities for residents, business owners, and corridor users to review the proposed improvements and provide feedback.
An online survey was posted on the City’s website in advance of the feasibility study to collect initial impressions about roadway condition,
intersection operations, pedestrian accessibility, and business access.
A public open house was held on October 30, 2025, at the Chanhassen City Hall. More than 25 attendees participated, including adjacent
property owners, business representatives, and community members who regularly travel the corridor. City staff and the engineering
consultant team presented the preliminary design concepts, discussed the intersection control options identified in the Intersection Control
Evaluation (ICE), and gathered public input on priorities and concerns.
B. Summary of Feedback
Comments from the open house and online survey were generally constructive and supportive of the pavement rehabilitation and ADA
improvements. Key themes included:
Intersection Safety and Traffic Operations
Many respondents expressed concern about the Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard intersection, citing difficulty making left turns,
limited visibility, and driver confusion regarding right-of-way.
• Several supported an All-Way Stop or Mini-Roundabout to slow traffic and improve safety for both drivers and pedestrians.
• One respondent noted that “the intersection is difficult even in a vehicle,” while another said, “a roundabout would slow traffic and
enable turns easier.”
• A few commenters also mentioned safety at nearby intersections such as Lake Drive East and Marsh Drive, requesting improved
crossings or warning flashers.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Connectivity
Strong support was expressed for improving sidewalks and crossings, particularly near the pedestrian bridge and between Mission Hills,
Lakewinds, and Park Nicollet Clinic.
• Residents frequently noted gaps in sidewalk continuity, especially along Great Plains Boulevard’s east side and between Grandview
Road and Lake Drive East.
• One respondent wrote, “It would be nice to have a continuous sidewalk on the east side of Great Plains. Right now, you have to cross
twice.”
168
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 12
• Another mentioned that “quick access to nature parks” and better trail linkages would encourage more walking and biking.
Drainage and Maintenance Concerns
Several participants reported localized drainage issues, including icy conditions and ponding near storm inlets—particularly on the south side
of Lake Drive East near Great Plains Boulevard and the east side of the Lakewinds building. Respondents asked that these issues be reviewed
and corrected during design.
Speed and Access
Speed and turning movements along both corridors were mentioned multiple times.
• A few residents described visibility challenges when turning from Lake Drive East onto Great Plains Boulevard, and requested
intersection lighting or clearer lane markings.
• Some residents along Marsh Drive noted concerns about vehicle speeds and pedestrian safety, suggesting that lower speed limits or
enhanced crossings be considered near Lake Drive East.
Assessments and Communication
A few respondents inquired about project funding and assessment methods, expressing interest in how costs would be distributed among
benefiting parcels. The City provided information during the open house and noted that final assessments will be determined i n accordance
with City policy and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429.
General Support for the Project
Overall sentiment was positive, with multiple participants thanking the City and ISG for hosting the open house and for inclu ding the public
early in the design process.
Comments such as “Thanks for all your thoughtful work” and “Please complete the project in an efficient and cost -effective manner” reflected
general appreciation for the planned improvements.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This feasibility report has been prepared in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 to advise the City Council on the need,
feasibility, and cost of improvements to Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard.
Findings
Necessity:
Pavement on Lake Drive East (PCI ≈ 40) and Great Plains Boulevard (PCI ≈ 60) has deteriorated beyond routine maintenance. Reh abilitation is
needed to restore pavement structure, ride quality, and drainage.
Cost-Effectiveness:
Full-depth reclamation on Lake Drive East and a 2-inch mill and overlay on Great Plains Boulevard provide the most economical solution for
the existing conditions while preserving curb and base materials.
The Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) further demonstrated that both the All-Way Stop Control (AWSC) and Mini-Roundabout alternatives
would significantly improve intersection safety, with potential crash reductions of up to 70 percent. However, the AWS C provides nearly
equivalent safety benefits at substantially lower cost—approximately $15,000 compared to $350,000 for a Mini-Roundabout—resulting in a
higher safety benefit-to-cost ratio (≈ 5:1 vs. 2.5:1).
The Mini-Roundabout and All-Way Stop Control each meet the project’s operational and safety objectives. The Mini-Roundabout may improve
flow and pedestrian visibility, while the All-Way Stop represents a lower-cost alternative with simpler maintenance requirements. Final
selection will be determined through coordination with City staff and Council during design development.
169
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com 13
Feasibility:
The work can be completed within existing right-of-way with minimal utility conflicts. Storm and water improvements are limited to casting and
valve adjustments; no sanitary sewer work is required.
Standards and Coordination:
All improvements will meet current City design and ADA standards. Street-lighting replacement will occur under a separate City contract
coordinated with Xcel Energy.
Funding Equity:
Project costs will be shared between benefiting property owners and the public in accordance with City policy —approximately 40 % assessed
and 60% funded through the City’s Pavement Management Program and utility enterprise funds.
Recommendation
The proposed Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard Rehabilitation (Project No. 26-02) is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible.
It is recommended that the City Council:
• Accept this Feasibility Report.
• Call for a Public Improvement Hearing under Minn. Stat. § 429.031.
170
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com A
APPENDIX A: OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS
171
Cost Estimate
Item
No.MnDOT No.ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL AMOUNT
1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$
2 2104.502 REMOVE CASTING EA 6 150.00$ 900.00$
3 2104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EA 1 500.00$ 500.00$
4 2104.502 REMOVE CONCRETE MEDIAN LF 350 30.00$ 10,500.00$
5 2104.503 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER LF 2390 8.00$ 19,120.00$
6 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE MEDIAN NOSE SY 40 25.00$ 1,000.00$
7 2104.504 REMOVE SIDEWALK SY 4775 15.00$ 71,625.00$
8 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 450 20.00$ 9,000.00$
9 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 770 10.00$ 7,700.00$
10 2104.518 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALK SF 275 10.00$ 2,750.00$
11 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON CY 2740 25.00$ 68,500.00$
12 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TN 320 20.00$ 6,400.00$
13 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION (P) SY 12775 5.00$ 63,875.00$
14 2231.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) - DRIVEWAYTON 30 200.00$ 6,000.00$
15 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 3680 100.00$ 368,000.00$
16 2504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX - WATER EA 6 800.00$ 4,800.00$
17 2505.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX - GAS EA 1 800.00$ 800.00$
18 2506.502 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING EA 4 500.00$ 2,000.00$
19 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY-STORM EA 6 1,500.00$ 9,000.00$
20 2506.603 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SPECIAL EA 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$
21 2521.518 6" CONCRETE WALK SF 5805 10.00$ 58,050.00$
22 2521.518 8" CONCRETE WALK SF 2400 15.00$ 36,000.00$
23 2531.504 8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 670 135.00$ 90,450.00$
24 2531.504 CONCRETE MEDIAN SY 700 100.00$ 70,000.00$
25 2531.602 CONCRETE MEDIAN NOSE-SPECIAL EA 3 3,500.00$ 10,500.00$
26 2531.603 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 3459 40.00$ 138,360.00$
27 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES SF 140 70.00$ 9,800.00$
28 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 40,000.00$ 40,000.00$
29 2564.518 SIGN PANEL SF 168 65.00$ 10,920.00$
30 2564.602 SIGN PANEL POST EA 28 250.00$ 7,000.00$
31 2565.602 RIGID PVC LOOP DETECTOR EA 11 1,200.00$ 13,200.00$
32 2574.507 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW CY 120 75.00$ 9,000.00$
33 2575.605 TURF ESTABLISHMENT ACRE 0.5 34,000.00$ 17,000.00$
34 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE MULTI COMP GR IN LF 1135 4.50$ 5,107.50$
35 2582.503 4" DBLE SOLID LINE MULTI COMP GR IN LF 1635 7.00$ 11,445.00$
36 2582.518 PAVT MSSG MULTI COMP GR IN SF 120 30.00$ 3,600.00$
37 2582.518 CROSSWALK MULTI COMP GR IN SF 738 20.00$ 14,760.00$
$1,276,162.50
$127,616.25
Total Construction Cost $1,403,778.75
$284,670.00
$1,688,448.75
Construction Costs
10% Contingency
Non-Construction Cost
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Client Name: CITY OF CHANHASSEN
Location: CHANHASSEN, MN
Date: 10/21/2025
ISG Project Number: 33064
Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost - Mini-Roundabout + FDR
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com 172
Cost Estimate
Item
No.
MnDOT
No.ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
AMOUNT
1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $60,000.00 $60,000.00
2 2104.502 REMOVE CASTING EA 6 $150.00 $900.00
3 2104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00
4 2104.503 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER LF 1860 $8.00 $14,880.00
5 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE MEDIAN NOSE SY 40 $25.00 $1,000.00
6 2104.504 REMOVE SIDEWALK SY 4775 $15.00 $71,625.00
7 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 450 $20.00 $9,000.00
8 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 480 $8.00 $3,840.00
9 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 770 $10.00 $7,700.00
10 2104.518 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALK SF 275 $10.00 $2,750.00
11 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON CY 1030 $25.00 $25,750.00
12 2211.509 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TN 320 $20.00 $6,400.00
13 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION (P) SY 8825 $7.00 $61,775.00
14 2232.504 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2") SY 3700 $4.00 $14,800.00
15 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) - DRIVEWAY TON 30 $200.00 $6,000.00
16 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 1460 $100.00 $146,000.00
17 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 1110 $100.00 $111,000.00
18 2504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX - WATER EA 6 $800.00 $4,800.00
19 2505.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX - GAS EA 1 $800.00 $800.00
20 2506.502 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING EA 4 $500.00 $2,000.00
21 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY-STORM EA 6 $1,500.00 $9,000.00
22 2506.603 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SPECIAL EA 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
23 2521.518 6" CONCRETE WALK SF 5805 $10.00 $58,050.00
24 2521.518 8" CONCRETE WALK SF 2400 $15.00 $36,000.00
25 2531.504 8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 420 $135.00 $56,700.00
26 2531.602 CONCRETE MEDIAN NOSE-SPECIAL EA 3 $3,500.00 $10,500.00
27 2531.603 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 1675 $40.00 $67,000.00
28 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES SF 140 $70.00 $9,800.00
29 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00
30 2564.518 SIGN PANEL SF 168 $65.00 $10,920.00
31 2564.602 SIGN PANEL POST EA 28 $250.00 $7,000.00
32 2565.602 RIGID PVC LOOP DETECTOR EA 11 $1,200.00 $13,200.00
33 2574.507 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW CY 120 $75.00 $9,000.00
34 2575.605 TURF ESTABLISHMENT ACRE 0.65 $34,000.00 $22,100.00
35 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE MULTI COMP GR IN LF 1135 $4.50 $5,107.50
36 2582.503 4" DBLE SOLID LINE MULTI COMP GR IN LF 1635 $7.00 $11,445.00
37 2582.518 PAVT MSSG MULTI COMP GR IN SF 120 $30.00 $3,600.00
38 2582.518 CROSSWALK MULTI COMP GR IN SF 738 $20.00 $14,760.00
$929,202.50
$92,920.25
Total Construction Cost $1,022,122.75
$284,670.00
$1,306,792.75
Construction Costs
10% Contingency
Non-Construction Cost
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Client Name: CITY OF CHANHASSEN
Location: CHANHASSEN, MN
Date: 10/20/2025
ISG Project Number: 33064
Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost - AWSC & FDR
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning ISGInc.com 173
2026 Lake Dr E Rehabilitation Project – Feasibility Report
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning | ISGInc.com B
APPENDIX B: INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION
174
Funding: Local Funds, Municipal State Aid (Chanhassen, MN)
Work Identification: Road Rehabilitation
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am
a duly licensed Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Corona Woychik, PE, PTOE Lic. No. Date
ISG
Reviewed:
City of Chanhassen Date
09/17/2025
Great Plains Blvd and Lake Dr E
Chanhassen, MN
for
INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION
59049 10/31/2025
175
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 1
Table of Contents
Purpose and Need...................................................................................................................... 1
Existing Roadway Characteristics ................................................................................................. 2
Future Roadway Characteristics ................................................................................................... 5
Analysis of Alternatives .............................................................................................................. 8
Summary ............................................................................................................................... 16
Appendix A: Traffic Counts ......................................................................................................... A
Appendix B: Illustration of Crashes ............................................................................................. B
Appendix C: Warrant Analysis .................................................................................................... C
Appendix D: Synchro Capacity Analysis ....................................................................................... D
Appendix E: Roundabout Exhibits ............................................................................................... E
Appendix F: Intersection Sight Distance ....................................................................................... F
Appendix G: Future Approach Lane Queue and LOS ....................................................................... G
List of Tables
Table 1: Traffic Data from 2025 Traffic Counts ............................................................................... 3
Table 2: Existing Turning Movements from July 2025 Traffic Counts .................................................. 4
Table 3: Historical Average Daily Traffic ........................................................................................ 5
Table 4: 2025 Traffic Volume at Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E (Adjusted Seasonal Variation) ............... 6
Table 5: 2045 Future Traffic Volumes at Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E (0.5% Growth Rate) ................. 7
Table 6: Crash Analysis Summary ................................................................................................ 9
Table 7: Signal Warrant Summary ............................................................................................. 11
Table 8: TWSC, AWSC and Roundabout Level of Service ............................................................... 12
Table 9: Signalized Intersection Level of Service ........................................................................... 12
Table 10: Existing (2025) Capacity Analysis Summary ................................................................... 12
Table 11: Future Year (2045) Capacity Analysis Summary ............................................................. 13
Table 12: Alternative Intersection Control Analysis Summary ......................................................... 16
Table 13: Recommendations (2045) Analysis Summary ................................................................ 17
List of Figures
Figure 1: Intersection Location Map .............................................................................................. 1
Figure 2: Great Plains Blvd and Lake Dr E Intersection Geometrics .................................................... 2
Figure 3: Historical Traffic Data .................................................................................................... 6
Figure 4: Traffic Data Sources ..................................................................................................... 7
176
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 1
Figure 1: Intersection Location Map
Purpose and Need
The City of Chanhassen is undertaking a roadway improvement project to rehabilitate a portion of Lake
Drive East and a portion of Great Plains Boulevard totaling approximately 0.5 miles. This corridor lies
within a predominantly commercial area, while also serving as a key access route to nearby residential
neighborhoods.
The project area includes two Municipal State Aid (MSA) streets, both of which are designated as
collector roadways.
• Lake Drive East between Great Plains Boulevard and Dakota Avenue, and
• Great Plains Boulevard between Trunk Highway (TH) 5 and Lake Drive East.
The existing roadway infrastructure was originally constructed in the early 1990s. Since then, it has only
received routine surface maintenance, including seal coating, and is now showing signs of aging and
deterioration. Given the age and condition of the pavement, a pavement rehabilitation project is necessary
to restore structural integrity, enhance safety, and support current and future traffic demands.
This project also includes an Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) as part of the preliminary design to
assess and improve intersection operations and safety within the corridor. The proposed improvements
will address both pavement needs and operational efficiencies to ensure the corridor continues to serve
its mixed-use environment effectively.
177
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 2
Figure 2: Great Plains Blvd and Lake Dr E Intersection Geometrics
Existing Roadway Characteristics
Lake Drive East runs for approximately 0.5 miles between Great Plains Boulevard and Dakota Avenue in
Chanhassen, serving as a key connector for both residential and commercial areas. Classified by MnDOT
as a Major Collector, the roadway features two travel lanes, supporting two -way traffic. Curb and gutter
are present on both sides, along with a 5-foot concrete sidewalk on one side. The posted speed limit is 30
mph, and several access points line the corridor, providing direct entry to adjacent properties. Lake Drive
East also intersects Marsh Drive and Hidden Court at two-way stop-controlled intersections, with stops
signs at both Marsh Drive and Hidden Court.
178
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 3
Table 1: Traffic Data from 2025 Traffic Counts
According to MnDOT’s Traffic Mapping Application, this segment of Lake Drive East carries a 2024 Annual
Average Daily Traffic (AADT) of 3,295 vehicles.
At Lake Drive East’s intersection with Great Plains Boulevard, traffic on Lake Drive East is stop-
controlled, while Great Plains Boulevard traffic flows without interruption. A marked pedestrian crosswalk
across Great Plains Boulevard accommodates pedestrian demand in this mixed-use area.
The segment of Great Plains Boulevard between Minnesota Trunk Highway (TH) 5 and Lake Drive East is
classified as a Major Collector and carries heavier traffic volumes. This portion provides critical
connectivity to TH 5 and features a more complex roadway configuration, including three 12-foot through
lanes, a 12-foot right-turn lane, and an 11-foot left-turn lane. An 8-foot wide raised median is present
through part of the intersection area. As of 2024, the AADT on this segment is 7,234 vehicles. Two
commercial driveways intersect this stretch; however, one is proposed to be removed as part of the
proposed project.
TRAFFIC DATA
The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and Turning Movement Count (TMC) data were collected on 1st, 2nd and
12th of July 2025 to evaluate the intersection control at Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Drive East. All
corresponding traffic count reports are provided in Appendix A.
These reports include peak-hour volumes, flow rates, total vehicle volumes, and hourly traffic counts for
Weekday AM, Weekday PM, and Saturday peak periods. To ensure the analysis represents typical travel
patterns, data was collected on weekdays and a weekend day, avoiding holidays. Tuesday and Wednesday
were chosen to reflect regular commuting traffic conditions, while a three -hour count on Saturday was
conducted to capture turning movements and weekend recreational or non-work travel demand, supporting
the operational analysis.
Average Daily
Traffic
AM Peak Volume
PM Peak Volume
Great Plains Blvd North of Lake
Dr E
4,526 329 413
Lake Dr E East of Great Plains
Blvd 2,859 227 261
Great Plains Blvd South of Lake
Dr E 6,687 522 383
Business Access West of Great
Plains Blvd
4,449
348
583
A 48-hour traffic count revealed distinct peak periods at 8:00 AM, 11:00 AM, 12:00 PM, 4:00 PM, and
6:00 PM, corresponding to commuter and midday travel patterns. Great Plains Boulevard functions as the
primary north-south corridor, with traffic volumes south of Lake Drive East exceeding those to the north
by more than 1.5 times, despite the southern segment being narrower. Notable traffic also originates
from the Business Access west of Great Plains Boulevard and from Lake Drive East, and nearby land uses
contribute to increased intersection demand, with PM peak volumes slightly higher than AM peaks across
all approaches. With schools in session, St. Hubert Catholic School, located south of Great Plains
Boulevard and east of Market Boulevard, will further contribute to this demand.
179
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 4
Table 2: Existing Turning Movements from July 2025 Traffic Counts
Consistent with seasonal factors that contribute to traffic variations throughout the year,
the recorded ADT volumes were approximately 33% lower than the AADT counts documented in the
MnDOT Traffic Mapping Application for Great Plains Boulevard.
NB SB EB WB
Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total
LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT
AM PEAK HOUR
(8:00 AM – 9:00 AM) 7 81 102 94 48 47 30 4 9 64 13 70
PM PEAK HOUR
(4:30 PM – 5:30 PM) 6 125 82 94 111 129 93 11 16 95 27 68
SAT PEAK HOUR
(11:30 AM -12:30 PM) 6 120 39 61 67 110 72 19 16 47 24 49
Table 2 summarizes the peak-hour volumes for each approach and illustrates the movements of vehicles
at each leg of the intersection. High volumes were observed in the NB through movement, EB left turn, and
WB right turn, indicating strong traffic flow towards TH 5 and Great Plains Boulevard. Additionally, a
notable number of vehicles approaching from TH 5 make SB right turns, likely serving trips to nearby
commercial destinations, including restaurants and retail establishments. Overall, traffic is relatively
balanced between the several movements.
CRASH DATA
Crash data for the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Drive East was collected for the past
five years, spanning 2021 through January 2025. During this period, a total of six crashes were reported,
involving twelve vehicles. Among these incidents, three were angle-type crashes, two occurred during left-
turn maneuvers, and the most recent recorded in June 2025 involved a side swipe collision and illustrations
are provided in the Appendix B.
The primary causes of crashes at the intersection appear to be failure to yield the right of way, driver
distraction, and limited visibility due to sun glare or windshield obstruction. In all the reviewed cases,
drivers frequently reported that they “didn’t see the other vehicle,” indicating a common issue of
inadequate visual detection.
Drivers reactions are as follows, in Case 1, both drivers failed to notice oncoming traffic: in Case 2, the
driver turning left did not see the through vehicle; in Case 3, the northbound driver did not see a vehicle
already turning left; in Case 4, the southbound driver on Great Plains Boulevard lost control of the vehicle
and collided with another; and in Case 5, a distracted driver using an electronic device who failed to yield
to northbound traffic on Great Plains Boulevard. These responses suggest that a combination of
inattention, or misjudgment, careless operations and environmental conditions like sun glare contributed
to the incidents.
The crash data analysis indicates that incidents were distributed across various days of the week and
occurred at different times of day, showing no consistent pattern related to time or weekday. The crashes
were recorded in July (2), December (2), and the remaining two in October and November, suggesting no
strong seasonal trend. Of the six crashes, five resulted in property damage only, while one involved a
minor injury. Most crashes (five) occurred during clear weather conditions, with only one happening during
snowfall. In terms of lighting, four crashes occurred during daylight and two during sunset. The highest
proportion of the drivers involved were aged 65–74, followed by those in the 35–54 age group, and most
were reported to be in normal physical condition at the time of the incidents. These findings indicate that
intersection geometry or design is unlikely to be a major contributing factor.
180
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 5
Table 3: Historical Average Daily Traffic
Future Roadway Characteristics
In order to establish valid capacity analysis results, it is important to consider any known planned roadway
improvements that may occur in the future on the surrounding roadway network. Great Plains Boulevard
between Lake Drive E and TH 5 is anticipated to be rehabilitated in 2026.
Improvements are not anticipated to increase roadway capacity. Similarly, the roadway improvements
included in the Lake Drive E roadway rehabilitation project are also not anticipated to increase roadway
capacity. No other roadway projects in the area are planned.
To analyze future roadway conditions and project traffic volumes, growth factors were determined based
on historical trends and local assumptions. Traffic volumes on Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Drive
East in Chanhassen have shown fluctuations over the past two decades rather than grown steadily, and
with the area’s low potential for significant redevelopment or residential density changes, future traffic
growth is expected to remain minimal.
Year
AADT
Lake Dr E
Annual Average
Growth Rate
(%)
Lake Dr E
AADT
Great
Plains Blvd
Annual Average
Growth Rate
(%)
Great Plains Blvd
2005 5000 6500
2007 5400 4 6600 1
2009 5600 2 4900 -14
2011 4350 -12 5100 2
2013 3700 -8 10800 46
2015 3850 2 9600 -6
2017 4300 6 6700 -16
2019 4400 1 8400 12
2021 3173 -15 7111 -8
2024 3295 1 7234 0.5
Between 2005 and 2024, Lake Drive East experienced a steady decline in AADT, decreasing from 5,000
vehicles in 2005 to 3,295 in 2024, reflecting a consistent downward trend over nearly two decades. This
suggests reduced traffic demand on this corridor. Meanwhile, Great Plains Boulevard showed more
variability, with AADT increasing from 6,500 in 2005 to a peak of 10,800 in 2013, followed by a gradual
decrease and stabilization around 7,234 vehicles by 2024. These contrasting trends indicate a sustained
reduction in traffic volumes on Lake Drive East, while Great Plains Boulevard has experienced fluctuating
but more stable traffic levels in recent years as shown in the Table 3.
181
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 6
Table 4: 2025 Traffic Volume at Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E (Adjusted Seasonal Variation)
Table 4 presents the traffic counts collected in July 2025 with a seasonal adjustment factor applied to
Great Plains Boulevard. The field survey recorded 5,606 vehicles on Great Plains Boulevard and 3,654
vehicles on Lake Drive East and the Business Access approach. When compared to MnDOT’s Traffic
Mapping Application data, counts for Great Plains Boulevard were approximately 33% lower than the
mapped values. This variation can be attributed to factors such as seasonal traffic fluctuations, day-of-
week and time-of-day effects, and local conditions like construction activity or changes in travel demand.
NB SB EB WB
Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total
LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT
AM PEAK HOUR
(8:00 AM – 9:00 AM) 9 108 136 125 64 62 30 4 9 64 13 70
PM PEAK HOUR
(4:30 PM – 5:30 PM) 8 166 109 125 148 172 93 11 16 95 27 68
SATPEAKHOUR
(11:30 AM -12:30
PM)
8 160 52 81 89 146 72 19 16 47 24 49
To normalize these differences and better represent annual average daily traffic (AADT), adjustment factor
of 1.33 was applied to Great Plains Boulevard approach traffic. These adjustments align short- term count
data with annualized volumes reported by MnDOT, striving for consistency and accuracy for subsequent
traffic analysis and design considerations. Figure 4 illustrates this comparison between MnDOT’s 2024
data, field traffic counts and adjusted traffic counts.
Figure 3: Historical Traffic Data
182
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 7
Table 5: 2045 Future Traffic Volumes at Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E (0.5% Growth Rate)
Although Chanhassen continues to experience steady development, recent traffic trends suggest
stabilization rather than significant growth in vehicular demand. For Lake Drive East, long-term patterns
indicate a decline in traffic volumes over the past decade, signaling minimal future increases.
However, likely redevelopment on the northeast quadrant of the intersection could introduce additional
traffic to the area. While the scale of the increase depends on the nature of future land uses, these
potential trips should be considered in future traffic evaluations and intersection planning.
The proposed closure of the existing driveway is expected to redirect existing site traffic to the Lake Drive
driveway with minimal impact on overall traffic volumes. A conservative annual growth rate of 0.5% has
been applied to both Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard. For Lake Drive East, this accounts for
redevelopment on the northeast quadrant of the intersection while reflecting overall traffic stabilization
along the corridor. Applying the same rate to Great Plains Boulevard reflects modest anticipated growth
while maintaining consistency in the city’s planning approach. This approach aligns with the city’s
emphasis on maintaining a balanced, multimodal transportation network and ensures that future traffic
projections remain realistic and sustainable. The design horizon considers a 20-year period, targeting the
year 2045 as shown in Table 5.
NB SB EB WB
Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total
LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT LT THRU RT
AM PEAK HOUR
(8:00 AM – 9:00 AM) 10 119 150 138 71 69 30 4 9 71 14 77
PM PEAK HOUR
(4:30 PM – 5:30 PM) 9 183 120 138 163 190 93 11 16 105 30 75
SAT PEAK HOUR
(11:30 AM -12:30 PM) 9 177 57 89 98 161 72 19 16 52 27 54
Figure 4: Traffic Data Sources
183
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 8
Analysis of Alternatives
The alternatives evaluated for the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Drive E are:
1. Two-Way Stop Control, the existing intersection control
2. All-Way Stop Control
3. Traffic Signal Control
4. Roundabout
Crash, warrant, and capacity analyses are provided for the intersection and the respective intersection
control alternative when applicable.
1. Two-Way Stop 2. All-Way Stop
3. Traffic Signal 4. Roundabout
184
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 9
Table 6: Crash Analysis Summary
CRASH ANALYSIS
The intersection experiences an average daily traffic of about 11,382 entering vehicles, translating to
roughly 4.1 million entering vehicles (MEV) per year based on collected data. Crash analysis results,
including intersection crash rates by control type from MnDOT’s Traffic Safety Fundamentals Handbook
(2015), are shown in Table 6. These rates were applied to the adjusted total entering traffic at the
Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Drive East intersection, with the outcomes summarized in the same
table.
Intersection Control
Alternative Intersection Control
Type
MnDOT Average Crash Rate
(Crashes/MEV) *
# of Anticipated Crashes at
Studied Intersection per Year
Existing Two-Way Stop Control MnDOT Average, 0.18
Current Rate at Intersection, 0.3
MnDOT Average, 0.7
Current Rate at Intersection, 1.5
2 All-Way Stop Control 0.35 1.4
3 Traffic Signal Control 0.54 2.2
4 Roundabout 0.3 1.2
*Average Crash Rates are obtained from 2015 MnDOT Traffic Safety Fundamentals Handbook
The intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Drive East has experienced a crash rate of 1.5 crashes
per year, or 0.3 crashes per MEV, which is about 50% greater than the MnDOT average crash rate of 0.18
for intersections with similar traffic control.
This higher than average crash rate suggests safety concerns, possibly related to operational or
geometric factors such as limited sight distance, gap acceptance issues, or increased traffic demand.
Modifying the intersection type to either all-way stop control or roundabout control can address these
concerns. Although crash rates are typically lowest at two-way stop controlled intersections, the crashes
that do occur are often angle-type crashes occurring at higher speeds, which can result in higher
severity crashes such as major injury and fatal crashes. According to the Highway Safety Manual,
introducing stop signs to convert a two-way stop control intersection to all-way stop control can reduce
total number of crashes by 70%, with angle-type crashes experiencing the largest reduction, 75%.
Converting to a roundabout type intersection would have a similar impact as converting to all-way stop
control. According to the Highway Safety Manual, converting from a two-way stop control to a
roundabout can reduce the intersection crash rate by about 40%, with injury related crashes
experiencing the largest reduction, 80%.
WARRANT ANALYSIS
A warrant analysis was performed for traffic signal control at the intersection in accordance with the 2024
MnMUTCD. Additionally, a warrant analysis was performed for all-way stop control at the intersection.
The traffic data collected in the July 2025 traffic count was adjusted for the effects of seasonality, a
growth rate of 0.5% on both Lake Drive East and Great Plains Boulevard and was used to conduct the
warrant analyses.
Two-Way Stop Control
Delay analysis of a two-way stop controlled intersection is required for the multi-way stop control
warrant analysis. Generally, two-way stop control is considered the “base” alternative. If a traffic signal,
all-way stop, or roundabout are not warranted or justified, then two-way stop control would be justified.
185
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 10
Warrant analyses were conducted to determine the need for left- and right-turn bays at a two-way stop
controlled intersection. Using peak hour volumes for the existing and future traffic conditions, the analysis
concluded that under Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC), left-turn lanes are warranted to accommodate
turning vehicles and minimize delays for through traffic. Turn warrants are provided in Appendix C.
However, the potential for long delays in the future highlights the limitations of the existing two-way stop
control at this intersection. Given the anticipated future traffic volumes and ongoing restricted sight
distance issues, two-way stop control may not be adequate to ensure safe and efficient traffic operations.
Therefore, it is necessary to conduct an All-Way Stop Control warrant analysis.
All-Way Stop Control
A multi-way stop control warrant analysis was conducted for the studied intersection, and it was met
based on the forecasted traffic conditions. Although Conditions A and B were not satisfied, the
intersection meets the volume and delay criteria, which requires major street traffic volumes of 300 or
more vehicles and minor street volumes of 200 or more vehicles during any 8 -hour period on an
average day. Additionally, the minor street traffic would need to experience delays of 30 seconds or
more per vehicle. In this case, the roadways meet the volume thresholds for both the existing and
future conditions. Although the delay threshold is not met in the existing condition, it is met in the
future condition, warranting the implementation of all-way stop control.
In the future PM scenario, where vehicles might experience greater than a 30 -second delay during peak
hours, only eastbound and westbound drivers would be affected. For these drivers, however, installing a
multi-way stop control would enhance their experience by reducing average delay.
The multi-way stop warrant analysis details are provided in Appendix C for reference.
Traffic Signal
A traffic signal warrant analysis was conducted for the intersection, utilizing forecasting traffic volumes
that were first adjusted to account for seasonal variations and projected growth to the design year of
2045. For Great Plains Boulevard, a minimum of two approach lanes were incorporated in the analysis to
accurately reflect the intersection’s operational characteristics. For Lake Drive East and the Business
Access, one approach lane was assumed.
The evaluation encompassed all nine traffic signal warrants as outlined in the MnMUTCD. Each warrant was
systematically assessed to determine its applicability to the intersection’s traffic conditions.
Table 7 presents a detailed summary of the warrants, indicating whether each criterion was met, along
with pertinent observations and considerations. The complete traffic signal warrant analysis including
detailed calculations, assumptions, and data sources are provided in Appendix C.
The traffic signal warrant analysis for the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Drive East,
projected for 2025, indicates that none of the MUTCD volume-based warrants are satisfied.
• The intersection does not meet the minimum thresholds for eight-hour, or four-hour volumes.
• Pedestrian volumes were 10 in the AM peak hour and 5 in the PM peak hour, based on the
collected turning movements.
• Warrants related to coordinated signal systems, crash experience, and roadway network, were not
met.
Based on the results, installation of a traffic signal is neither warranted nor justified under current or
projected conditions. Alternative traffic control strategies should be evaluated to enhance safety and
operational efficiency at this intersection.
186
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 11
Table 7: Signal Warrant Summary
WARRANT DESCRIPTION MET/ NOT MET
(EXISTING)
MET/ NOT MET
(FUTURE) DESCRIPTION
Warrant 1 A - Minimum Vehicular
Volume NOT MET NOT MET Traffic volumes below MUTCD thresholds
Warrant 1 B - Interruption
Continuous Traffic NOT MET NOT MET Major street flow not significantly interrupted
Warrant 2 - Four Hour Volumes NOT MET NOT MET Combined approach volumes do not meet criteria
Warrant 3 - Peak Hour N/A N/A Area not impacted by generators with significant
shift change or special traffic
Warrant 4 - Pedestrian Volume NOT MET NOT MET Pedestrian activity is minimal
Warrant 5 - School Crossing N/A N/A No school crossing near or at the intersection
Warrant 6 - Coordinated Signal
System NOT MET NOT MET Nearby signal provides for satisfactory platooning
Warrant 7 - Crash Experience NOT MET NOT MET Crash history is below the warrant thresholds
Warrant 8 - Roadway Network NOT MET NOT MET Not a critical intersection
Warrant 9 – Intersection Near a
Grade Crossing N/A N/A No grade crossing within proximity
Roundabout
There are no current warrants for the installation of roundabouts, and none were analyzed with this
study; however, MnDOT currently recommends using either the multi-way stop warrant or traffic signal
control warrant criteria for considering roundabouts. Since all-way stop control is warranted at the studied
intersection for the future condition, a roundabout is also warranted in the future condition.
CAPACITY ANALYSIS
Capacity analysis was conducted for all four alternatives under both existing and future conditions. For the
existing condition, each alternative was assessed using PM peak hour traffic based on the collected data.
For the future condition, each alternative was analyzed using PM peak hour traffic volumes adjusted for
seasonal variation and projected to the design year, applying a 0.5% annual growth rate for both the
approaches.
Synchro version 11 and Highway Capacity Software (HCS) 2025 were used to evaluate the alternatives
for the intersection. Intersections are evaluated for Level of Service (LOS) and control delays. There are
six LOS ratings, ranging from A to F. LOS A is the highest rating and represents an average vehicular
delay of 10 seconds or less. LOS F is the lowest rating and represents average vehicle delays of greater
than 80 seconds for signalized intersections and greater than 50 seconds for unsignalized intersections.
Delays are represented as seconds per vehicle which are shown in the Tables 8 and 9.
187
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 12
Control Delay Per Vehicle (s) LOS
≤10 A
10 to 15 B
15 to 25 C
25 to 35 D
35 to 50 E
>50 F
Control Delay Per Vehicle (s) LOS
≤10 A
10 to 20 B
20 to 35 C
35 to 55 D
55 to 80 E
>80 F
Table 10: Existing (2025) Capacity Analysis Summary
Along with evaluating the Level of Service (LOS), maximum queue lengths were analyzed for all four
intersection control alternatives, with particular attention to the southbound lanes of Great Plains
Boulevard; including the left-turn, thru, and right-turn movements and the eastbound lanes of Lake Dr
East. This assessment aimed to ensure that projected vehicle volumes could be accommodated without
obstructing traffic flow on TH 5 or the intersecting approaches, and without interfering with access to the
adjacent driveway and parking areas along the eastbound leg. Summaries of vehicular queues are
provided in Table 10, and detail reports are provided in Appendix D.
Tables 10 and 11 summarize the results of the capacity analysis conducted for both existing and future
(2045) traffic conditions across four types of traffic control: Traffic Signal, All-Way Stop, Two- Way Stop,
and Roundabout. Detailed analysis is provided in Appendix D.
PM PEAK HOUR Overall EB WB NB SB
Traffic Signal LOS A B B A A
Approach Delay 8.6 19.9 17.5 3.5 2.7
Queue 80 125 60 66
All-Way Stop LOS B B B B A
Approach Delay 11 11.7 12.6 10.9 10
Queue 48 57 56 56
Two-Way Stop LOS N/A C C N/A N/A
Approach Delay N/A 15.9 19.1 N/A N/A
Queue 57 77 N/A 38
Roundabout LOS A A A A A
Approach Delay 5.3 4.8 5.0 5.2 5.7
Queue 50 51 62 37
*The Traffic Signal alternative was analyzed using Synchro 11 modeling software, Percentile Delay methodology. All-
Way Stop and Two-Way Stop were analyzed using Synchro 11 modeling software, HCM 6th Edition delay method.
The Roundabout alternative was analyzed using HCS 2025’s Roundabout module.
For the existing conditions, all control types demonstrate levels of service (LOS) of C or better. This
indicates efficient traffic flow during the PM peak hour for most controls.
Table 8: TWSC, AWSC, and Roundabout Level of Service Table 9: Signalized Intersection Level of Service
188
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 13
PM PEAK HOUR Overall EB WB NB SB
Traffic Signal LOS A B B A A
Approach Delay 8 18.5 18 3.8 3.7
Queue 76 158 84 81
All-Way Stop LOS B B C B B
Approach Delay 13.5 13.5 15.8 14.2 12.1
Queue 41 70 68 61
Two-Way Stop LOS N/A C E N/A N/A
Approach Delay N/A 24.6 47.3 N/A N/A
Queue 59 97 22 53
Roundabout
LOS A A A A A
Approach Delay 6.8 5.5 5.7 6.7 7.7
Queue 49 55 87 82
*The Traffic Signal alternative was analyzed using Synchro 11 modeling software, Percentile Delay methodology. All-Way
Stop and Two-Way Stop were analyzed using Synchro 11 modeling software, HCM 6th Edition delay method. The
Roundabout alternative was analyzed using HCS 2025’s Roundabout module.
Looking ahead to the future traffic conditions, the LOS varies more significantly, ranging from A to E
depending on the control type. Both the Roundabout and Traffic Signal controls continue to perform
well, as modeled, maintaining low delays and LOS A and B ratings, which reflects their capability to
handle increased traffic volumes efficiently. A note: traffic operations is dependent on selected traffic
signal phasing and timings for traffic signal control and selected roundabout diameter for roundabout
control. With very small roundabout diameters, roundabouts operate more similarly to all -way stop
control.
Conversely, the Two-Way Stop control performs the poorest under future traffic demand, with LOS
ratings dropping to C and E on side road approaches, indicating more pronounced delays and reduced
operational effectiveness. This highlights that Two-Way Stop control may not be suitable long term and
would likely lead to congestion, increased delays and crashes if retained.
Although the southbound lanes offer a storage length that exceeds the maximum queue length to
accommodate peak queues under the future conditions, installing a traffic signal at this intersection is
not an ideal solution due to the relatively low expected traffic volumes. Additionally, the proximity of the
city boundary and the amount of developed land in this area limits any significant future growth that
could lead to traffic demand levels warranting signal control.
Given these conditions, the intersection control options under consideration for future conditions are
either a roundabout or all-way stop control.
A roundabout would require careful design to ensure adequate operations. NCHRP 1043 recommends
that private/commercial access points such as driveway on the eastbound should not tie directly into
the roundabout, and alternatives should be considered before allowing direct access. However, the
traffic volumes using the Business Access are sufficiently high that the approach operates similar to
private or public street.
If a roundabout is implemented at this location, the center should be placed so that vehicles backing
out of parking spaces would not conflict with circulating roundabout traffic. Additionally, space for one
to two vehicles should be incorporated so that vehicles attempting to exit the roundabout do not
obstruct roundabout traffic while waiting for vehicle to reverse out of a parking space.
Table 11: Future Year (2045) Capacity Analysis Summary
189
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 14
RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION
Because the existing intersection is already controlled by Two-Way Stop signs, maintaining the current
control or converting to All-Way Stop Control would not require acquiring additional right of way.
Additionally, per GIS mapping of parcel data for Carver County, it appears there is enough space for
traffic signal control equipment if the intersection were to be converted to traffic signal control.
A mini-roundabout with a 90-foot inscribed circle diameter can also be accommodated within the
existing intersection. If additional right-of-way on the east side to be acquired, a more traditionally-sized
single-lane roundabout could also be considered. Showing conceptual layouts of a mini and traditional
roundabout Exhibits are attached in the Appendix E.
SIGHT DISTANCE
Most of the crashes at this intersection are attributed to vision being obscured, followed by failure to
yield the right-of-way. This indicates that visibility issues are impacting safety and overall operational
performance. Sketches are provided in the Appendix F.
At the two-way stop-controlled (TWSC) intersection, a building and trees along the west side of Great
Plains Boulevard south of the intersection create visibility constraints for certain turning movements.
Otherwise, sightlines are generally adequate. While current traffic volumes are low and impacts are
minimal, future conditions with higher traffic could result in additional safety and operational concerns.
At an all-way stop-controlled (AWSC) intersection, all vehicles would be required to stop before
entering the intersection which can improve overall visibility and safety. Since all approaches are
controlled, drivers can observe each approach clearly without significant obstructions in the sight
triangles. This reduces uncertainty, and allows drivers to proceed in an orderly manner, leading to
smoother operations at the intersection compared to a two-way stop-controlled scenario.
For the roundabout alternative, vehicle speeds would be significantly reduced to approximately 15
MPH as drivers approach and navigate through the intersection. This lower operating speed enhances
safety by minimizing crash severity and making sight distance requirements less critical compared to a
two-way stop control. While a roundabout improves overall visibility and reduces conflict points, it
does present some challenges at this location. The adjacent commercial driveway, which currently has
perpendicular parking, would require partial removal of private parking to accommodate the
roundabout design. Additionally, managing traffic flow from the driveway could be complex,
particularly if vehicles attempt to merge into circulating traffic without sufficient gaps. This could lead
to potential traffic accumulation or operational issues at peak times. Despite these considerations, the
roundabout remains a feasible option for improving safety, provided that access management and
parking adjustments are carefully addressed.
COST
Costs for roundabout construction can vary significantly. For planning purposes, to implement a full -sized
roundabout at this intersection the estimated cost would be between $1 to $1.2 million. A substantial
portion of this cost comes from tying the north leg into the existing pavement. The existing median will need
to be reconstructed due to widening; the pavement along the proposed median alignment could be sawcut,
followed by a mill-and-fill on the existing pavement to refresh the surface and match the designed roadway
grade. For a mini roundabout, similar work would be required on the north leg, and the estimated cost
savings compared to a full-sized roundabout could be approximately $250,000.
To implement the All-Way Stop Control, two additional stop signs would need to be installed, as two are already
present at the intersection. The estimated cost for adding these two new sign posts is approximately $1000,
which is relatively low compared to other intersection control alternatives. Removal of pavement to reduce
lanes and provide clarity to drivers navigating the intersection would be an added cost.
190
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 15
To right-size the intersection, several lanes would need to be removed. The southbound approach would
need to be converted from a three-lane approach to a two-lane approach: a southbound left- turn only
lane and a shared through-right lane. Additionally, the northbound approach would be converted from
two approach lanes to a single left-through-right shared approach lane. Infrastructure changes for this
geometric reconfiguration would require curb and gutter reconstruction, pavement removal, pedestrian
cross walk painting and restoration of the boulevard area.
Furthermore, the maintenance cost for an All-Way Stop Control is minimal, typically limited to periodic
inspections, sign cleaning, and occasional replacement due to damage or wear. These maintenance
activities are part of routine traffic control device upkeep and do not represent a significant ongoing
expense for the agency. Lane reduction would reduce the amount of pavement requiring snow removal in
the winter months; however, depending on the boulevard materials, increased vegetated surfaces in the
boulevard may increase maintenance effort.
PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST ACCOMMODATIONS
Bicycle and pedestrian volumes at the study intersection are generally low but consistent throughout the
day, with peak bicycle activity occurring westbound during midday and peak pedestrian activity mainly
on the north and west legs. The crosswalk across the north leg and the sidewalk along the east leg
effectively support these movement patterns. Both modes were observed at multiple times beyond peak
periods, indicating regular non-motorized use. Overall non-motorized volumes were 3 to 4 pedestrians
and 1 to 2 bicyclists per hour based on the collected turning movements.
Also, it was observed that westbound bicyclists traveling from the east often use the sidewalk and
proceed through the intersection, while bicyclists on the other three legs ride on the roadway alongside
motor vehicles, highlighting the value of dedicated on-street bicycle accommodations along Lake Drive
East to encourage roadway use by bicyclists.
MnDOT’s Bicycle Facility Design Manual recommends dedicated bike lanes or protected bike lanes where
right-of-way allows, especially on busier or higher-speed roadways. For constrained spaces, shared lane
markings can be used. On-street bicycle lanes would be an appropriate treatment for Lake Drive East, and a
separated bike path would be appropriate for Great Plains Boulevard. All alternatives should include continuous
pedestrian sidewalks to support safe and accessible travel. Although bike lanes are not required for
rehabilitation type Minnesota State Aid projects and the decision for inclusion of bike lanes lie with the
local jurisdiction. Incorporating dedicated bicycle facilities, particularly westbound, and pedestrian
sidewalks in all design alternatives would align with best practices to accommodate all road users in
urban environments.
CRITERIA FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL MODIFICATION
A threshold evaluation was conducted to determine the appropriate year for transitioning the
intersection from Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) to All-Way Stop Control (AWSC), based on the projected
traffic volume growth, anticipated delay, and MUTCD volume- and delay-based warrants.
Based on available traffic data, MnMUTCD AWSC warrant volume criteria is satisfied for both the existing
and the future conditions. By modeling the existing and proposed traffic conditions assuming TWSC,
MnMUTCD AWSC delay criteria would be satisfied around 2033.
191
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 16
Table 12: Alternative Intersection Control Analysis Summary
Summary
From the traffic analysis presented in this report, the following table summarizes the findings.
Existing Traffic Future Traffic
Alternative
Crash
Analysis
Warrant
Analysis
Capacity
Analysis
Warrant
Analysis
Capacity
Analysis
Sight
Distance
Cost
Two-Way
Stop
1 crash
per year N/A Acceptable N/A Unacceptable Obstructed $
All-Way
Stop
1 crash
per year Not Warranted Acceptable Warranted Acceptable Unobstructed $$
Traffic
Signal
2 crashes
per year Not Warranted Acceptable Not
Warranted
Acceptable N/A $$$$
Roundabout 1 crash
per year Not Warranted Acceptable Warranted Acceptable Unobstructed $$$, Mini Roundabout
$$$$, Traditional
Roundabout
Traffic Signal
Installing signalized control at this intersection would improve operations during peak hours; however,
the existing and future traffic volumes do not justify the need for a signal. A traffic signal is not
warranted and would incur excess initial construction and ongoing maintenance costs. During off-peak
hours, when traffic is minimal, vehicles on the minor approach would still be required to stop or wait
unnecessarily, resulting in increased delay and reduced efficiency.
Roundabout
A roundabout generally performs well at this intersection. Although a traditionally sized roundabout would
require right-of-way acquisition, an appropriately designed roundabout, with space to provide a buffer
between the roundabout’s circulating lane and parked vehicles, is a warranted and feasible solution.
Alternatively, a mini-roundabout would likely not require right-of-way acquisition and can be much less
costly than a traditionally-sized single lane roundabout. Thoughtful design would still be required for a
mini-roundabout to prevent conflicts with the Business Access’s parking area.
Stop Control
An all-way stop control is a suitable option as it offers levels of service B or better, maximized sight
distance, and low maintenance. However, the current roadway configuration would need adjustment. The
southbound approach presently includes three lanes: right-turn, through, and left-turn movements. If the
configuration remains unchanged, all three vehicles in these lanes would need to stop and determine the
order of movement, which can lead to confusion and inefficiency. For this reason, it is generally not ideal
to maintain three lanes on one or more approaches at an all -way stop- controlled intersection.
Based on the study findings, the intersection can operate efficiently under any control type for the next 8
years. Therefore, there is no immediate need to implement major changes; however, changes may be
implemented as part of the upcoming rehabilitation project, if desired. Considering the low anticipated
annual traffic growth rate of 0.5%, the existing configuration will be able to accommodate future traffic
demand for at least the next 8 years, as determined in threshold criteria, which analyzed the threshold
point for capacity improvements.
192
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Page 17
All-way stop control is recommended at the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Lake Drive
East to balance operational efficiency, sight distance needs, safety, right-of-way impacts, and cost.
Additionally, all-way stop control is warranted in approximately 8 years.
For all-way stop control, reducing the southbound approach to two southbound lanes, a left -turn only
lane and a shared through-right lane is recommended. Additionally, reducing the northbound approach to
one northbound lane, a single shared left-through-right lane, is recommended. These changes were
modeled, and results are summarized in Table 13 and detailed analysis reports are provided in
Appendix G.
Table 13: Recommendations (2045) Analysis Summary
PM PEAK HOUR Overall EB WB NB SB
All-Way Stop LOS C B B C C
Approach Delay 15.3 12.2 13.8 15.9 18.1
Queue 46 69 88 59
If desired, these changes may be piloted during the spring or early summer for a short period, such as 1-2
months. To pilot these geometric changes prior to permanent implementation, movable concrete barrier
or similar barricades may be installed in the existing southbound right-turn lane to close the lane. The
northbound approach may be restriped to clearly indicate that the right -lane is not to be used for
vehicular travel. A barricade may also be installed if non- compliance is apparent. These pilot measures
can be implemented to help convince the travelling public that impacts to adjacent intersections are not
anticipated; however, if for any reason the City of Chanhassen chooses to abandon modification to all -
way stop control, the temporary measures may be removed.
193
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report- Chanhassen, MN Appendix A
Appendix A: Traffic Counts
A-1 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
A-2 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC REPORTS
194
Type of peak hour beingreported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
Page 1 of 1
LOCATION: Great Plains Blvd -- Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140001
CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Tue, Jul 1 2025
Peak-Hour: 8:00 AM -- 9:00 AM
189 181 1.1 2.2
Peak 15-Min: 8:00 AM -- 8:15 AM
47 48 94 0 2.1 1.1
67 30 70 147 0 0 1.4 1.4
4 0.92 13 0 0
43 9 64 200 0 0 1.6 0.5
7 81 102 0 3.7 0
121 190 1.7 1.6
1 0 0 0
0 0
1 0 1 0
0 0
1 0 0 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
15-MinCount
Be Period At ginning
Great Plains Blvd
Left (Northbound) Great Plains Blvd
(Southbound)
Lake Dr E
(Eastbound)
Lake Dr E
(Westbound) Total Hourl Total Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 6:30 AM
6:45 AM
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
7:45 AM
0 2 8 0
0 2 8 0
2 2 8 0
1 5 20 0
2 10 14 0
1 10 33 0
8 4 0 0
17 6 4 0
11 9 6 0
22 18 5 0
22 4 5 0
28 13 9 0
6 1 1 0
1 1 2 0
0 0 0 0
3 5 0 0
2 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
5 0 2 0
6 0 9 0
11 6 4 0
18 3 7 0
14 0 11 0
20 2 7 0
37
56
59
107
84
124
259
306
374
8:00 AM 5 31 30 0 19 10 10 0 7 2 6 0 13 3 18 0 154 469
8:15 AM
8:30 AM
8:45 AM
1 12 24 0
0 17 22 0
1 21 26 0
24 11 14 0
27 8 9 0
24 19 14 0
8 1 1 0
8 1 1 0
7 0 1 0
16 2 25 0
16 1 18 0
19 7 9 0
139
128
148
501
545
569
9:00 AM
9:15 AM
2 13 19 0
0 16 10 0
21 13 23 0
17 15 14 0
14 3 1 0
11 2 0 0
21 4 20 0
17 1 10 0
154
113
569
543
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U
All Vehicles
HeavyTrucks
Buses
Pedestrians
Bicycles
Scooters
20 124 120 0
0 0 0
0
0 0 0
76 40 40 0
0 0 0
4
0 0 0
28 8 24 0
0 0 0
4
0 0 0
52 12 72 0
0 0 0
0
0 0 0
616
0
8
0
Comments:
Report generated on 7/16/2025 12:49 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
195
Type of peak hour beingreported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
Page 1 of 1
LOCATION: Great Plains Blvd -- Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140002
CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Tue, Jul 1 2025
Peak-Hour: 4:30 PM -- 5:30 PM
334 286 0 0.3
Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM
129 111 94 0 0 0
162 93 68 190 0 0 0 0
11 0.92 27 0 0
120 16 95 187 0 0 0 2.1
6 125 82 0 0.8 4.9
222 213 0 2.3
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
15-MinCount
Be Period At ginning
Great Plains Blvd
Left (Northbound) Great Plains Blvd
(Southbound)
Lake Dr E
(Eastbound)
Lake Dr E
(Westbound) Total Hourl Total Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 3:30 PM
3:45 PM
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
1 24 19 0
3 24 21 0
1 28 13 0
5 26 20 0
21 24 33 0
27 17 14 0
18 24 23 1
17 32 32 0
13 6 4 0
19 4 6 0
24 3 3 0
17 7 3 0
26 8 20 0
20 3 15 0
28 7 25 0
28 9 14 0
199
173
198
210
780
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
2 21 17 0
2 42 23 0
25 32 39 0
15 20 30 0
17 2 4 0
21 3 1 0
13 4 15 0
29 6 20 0
191
212
772
811
5:00 PM 1 32 21 0 35 30 29 0 24 4 3 0 26 9 18 0 232 845
5:15 PM 1 30 21 0 19 29 31 0 31 2 8 0 27 8 15 0 222 857
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
6:00 PM
6:15 PM
0 30 7 0
2 23 19 0
3 27 13 0
2 18 13 0
18 28 30 0
16 24 32 0
16 25 28 0
18 19 29 1
14 3 2 0
13 4 2 0
17 3 6 0
33 4 5 0
20 2 16 0
14 3 12 0
17 8 13 0
10 3 16 0
170
164
176
171
836
788
732
681
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U
All Vehicles
HeavyTrucks
Buses
Pedestrians
Bicycles
Scooters
4 128 84 0
0 0 4
0
0 0 0
140 120 116 0
0 0 0
0
0 0 0
96 16 12 0
0 0 0
0
0 0 0
104 36 72 0
0 0 0
0
0 0 0
928
4
0
0
Comments:
Report generated on 7/16/2025 12:49 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
196
Type of peak hour beingreported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
Page 1 of 1
LOCATION: Great Plains Blvd -- Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140003
CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Sat, Jul 12 2025
Peak-Hour: 11:30 AM -- 12:30 PM
238 241 0 0.4
Peak 15-Min: 11:45 AM -- 12:00 PM
110 67 61 0 0 0
140 72 49 120 0 1.4 0 0
19 0.98 24 0 0
107 16 47 119 0.9 0 0 0
6 120 39 0 0 0
130 165 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2
0 1 0 1
0 2
1 0 0 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
15-MinCount
Be Period At ginning
Great Plains Blvd
Left (Northbound) Great Plains Blvd
(Southbound)
Lake Dr E
(Eastbound)
Lake Dr E
(Westbound) Total Hourl Total Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U
11:00 AM
11:15 AM
0 18 12 0
3 27 16 0
14 22 17 1
10 21 37 0
10 2 2 0
6 1 0 0
16 8 10 0
8 4 15 0
132
148
11:30 AM 2 31 9 0 13 17 29 0 21 4 3 0 11 5 9 0 154
11:45 AM 1 22 8 0 16 21 33 0 14 7 2 0 14 9 13 0 160 594
12:00 PM
12:15 PM
1 40 15 0
2 27 7 0
19 10 23 0
13 19 25 0
17 4 10 0
20 4 1 0
6 4 11 0
16 6 16 0
160
156
622
630
12:30 PM
12:45 PM
1:00 PM
1:15 PM
1:30 PM
1:45 PM
2 24 13 0
2 17 11 0
0 14 11 0
0 21 10 0
0 15 8 0
0 13 6 0
10 11 20 1
16 13 28 0
32 17 36 0
7 14 34 0
17 24 27 0
11 12 23 0
18 7 2 0
22 2 3 0
15 7 4 0
13 2 0 0
23 5 1 0
26 4 2 0
10 4 17 0
9 4 8 0
9 8 13 0
9 5 12 0
8 6 8 0
10 2 11 0
139
135
166
127
142
120
615
590
596
567
570
555
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U
All Vehicles
HeavyTrucks
Buses
Pedestrians
Bicycles
Scooters
4 88 32 0
0 0 0
0
0 0 0
64 84 132 0
0 0 0
0
0 0 0
56 28 8 0
0 0 0
0
0 0 0
56 36 52 0
0 0 0
0
0 4 8
640
0
0
12
Comments:
Report generated on 7/16/2025 12:49 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
197
Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data
Page 1 of 1
LOCATION: Great Plains Blvd north of Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140004
SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: NB
CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025
Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25
Average Weekday
Hourly Traffic
Sat Sun Average Week
Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile
12:00 AM
01:00 AM
02:00 AM
03:00 AM
04:00 AM
05:00 AM
06:00 AM
07:00 AM
08:00 AM
09:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
01:00 PM
02:00 PM
03:00 PM
04:00 PM
05:00 PM
06:00 PM
07:00 PM
08:00 PM
09:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
6 7
2 4
2 2
1 1
8 9
12 12
45 59
107 89
124 126
127 123
128 137
145 155
181 158
130 128
147 148
195 184
216 197
213 197
153 148
97 99
54 64
50 41
12 11
9 9
7
3
2
1
9
12
52
98
125
125
133
150
170
129
148
190
207
205
151
98
59
46
12
9
7
3
2
1
9
12
52
98
125
125
133
150
170
129
148
190
207
205
151
98
59
46
12
9
Day Total 2164 2108 2141 2141
%Weekday
Average 101.1% 98.5%
%Week
Average 101.1% 98.5% 100%
AMPeak
Volume
11:00 AM 11:00 AM
145 155
11:00 AM
150
11:00 AM
150
PMPeak
Volume
4:00 PM 4:00 PM
216 197
4:00 PM
207
4:00 PM
207
Comments:
Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net)
198
Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data
Page 1 of 1
LOCATION: Great Plains Blvd north of Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140004
SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: NB, SB
CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025
Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25
Average Weekday
Hourly Traffic
Sat Sun Average Week
Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile
12:00 AM
01:00 AM
02:00 AM
03:00 AM
04:00 AM
05:00 AM
06:00 AM
07:00 AM
08:00 AM
09:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
01:00 PM
02:00 PM
03:00 PM
04:00 PM
05:00 PM
06:00 PM
07:00 PM
08:00 PM
09:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
9 10
5 7
2 4
4 2
12 12
32 27
76 115
214 232
314 275
261 263
284 293
318 340
371 374
297 275
318 324
376 368
416 409
400 404
304 317
234 222
124 154
87 83
24 22
18 11
10
6
3
3
12
30
96
223
295
262
289
329
373
286
321
372
413
402
311
228
139
85
23
15
10
6
3
3
12
30
96
223
295
262
289
329
373
286
321
372
413
402
311
228
139
85
23
15
Day Total 4500 4543 4526 4526
% Weekday
Average 99.4% 100.4%
% Week
Average 99.4% 100.4% 100%
AMPeak
Volume
11:00 AM 11:00 AM
318 340
11:00 AM
329
11:00 AM
329
PMPeak
Volume
4:00 PM 4:00 PM
416 409
4:00 PM
413
4:00 PM
413
Comments:
Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net)
199
Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data
Page 1 of 1
LOCATION: Great Plains Blvd north of Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140004
SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: SB
CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025
Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25
Average Weekday
Hourly Traffic
Sat Sun Average Week
Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile
12:00 AM
01:00 AM
02:00 AM
03:00 AM
04:00 AM
05:00 AM
06:00 AM
07:00 AM
08:00 AM
09:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
01:00 PM
02:00 PM
03:00 PM
04:00 PM
05:00 PM
06:00 PM
07:00 PM
08:00 PM
09:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
3 3
3 3
0 2
3 1
4 3
20 15
31 56
107 143
190 149
134 140
156 156
173 185
190 216
167 147
171 176
181 184
200 212
187 207
151 169
137 123
70 90
37 42
12 11
9 2
3
3
1
2
4
18
44
125
170
137
156
179
203
157
174
183
206
197
160
130
80
40
12
6
3
3
1
2
4
18
44
125
170
137
156
179
203
157
174
183
206
197
160
130
80
40
12
6
Day Total 2336 2435 2390 2390
% Weekday
Average 97.7% 101.9%
% Week
Average 97.7% 101.9% 100%
AMPeak
Volume
8:00 AM 11:00 AM
190 185
11:00 AM
179
11:00 AM
179
PMPeak
Volume
4:00 PM 12:00 PM
200 216
4:00 PM
206
4:00 PM
206
Comments:
Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net)
200
Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data
Page 1 of 1
LOCATION: Lake Dr E east of Great Plains Blvd/Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140005
SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: EB
CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025
Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25
Average Weekday
Hourly Traffic
Sat Sun Average Week
Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile
12:00 AM
01:00 AM
02:00 AM
03:00 AM
04:00 AM
05:00 AM
06:00 AM
07:00 AM
08:00 AM
09:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
01:00 PM
02:00 PM
03:00 PM
04:00 PM
05:00 PM
06:00 PM
07:00 PM
08:00 PM
09:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
0 0
0 1
0 0
2 0
3 2
17 14
17 31
41 37
66 46
85 74
88 87
138 150
167 153
129 113
144 114
115 131
161 131
149 145
140 134
93 103
57 57
46 46
26 8
3 2
0
1
0
1
3
16
24
39
56
80
88
144
160
121
129
123
146
147
137
98
57
46
17
3
0
1
0
1
3
16
24
39
56
80
88
144
160
121
129
123
146
147
137
98
57
46
17
3
Day Total 1687 1579 1636 1636
% Weekday
Average 103.1% 96.5%
% Week
Average 103.1% 96.5% 100%
AMPeak
Volume
11:00 AM 11:00 AM
138 150
11:00 AM
144
11:00 AM
144
PMPeak
Volume
12:00 PM 12:00 PM
167 153
12:00 PM
160
12:00 PM
160
Comments:
Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net)
201
Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data
Page 1 of 1
LOCATION: Lake Dr E east of Great Plains Blvd/Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140005
SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: EB, WB
CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025
Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25
Average Weekday
Hourly Traffic
Sat Sun Average Week
Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile
12:00 AM
01:00 AM
02:00 AM
03:00 AM
04:00 AM
05:00 AM
06:00 AM
07:00 AM
08:00 AM
09:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
01:00 PM
02:00 PM
03:00 PM
04:00 PM
05:00 PM
06:00 PM
07:00 PM
08:00 PM
09:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
3 1
1 2
0 2
2 0
3 3
17 14
29 42
52 58
110 89
135 124
165 149
218 236
274 247
237 208
246 192
218 217
265 230
260 237
253 242
179 194
112 139
97 99
56 27
12 8
2
2
1
1
3
16
36
55
100
130
157
227
261
223
219
218
248
249
248
187
126
98
42
10
2
2
1
1
3
16
36
55
100
130
157
227
261
223
219
218
248
249
248
187
126
98
42
10
Day Total 2944 2760 2859 2859
% Weekday
Average 103% 96.5%
% Week
Average 103% 96.5% 100%
AMPeak
Volume
11:00 AM 11:00 AM
218 236
11:00 AM
227
11:00 AM
227
PMPeak
Volume
12:00 PM 12:00 PM
274 247
12:00 PM
261
12:00 PM
261
Comments:
Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net)
202
Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data
Page 1 of 1
LOCATION: Lake Dr E east of Great Plains Blvd/Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140005
SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: WB
CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025
Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25
Average Weekday
Hourly Traffic
Sat Sun Average Week
Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile
12:00 AM
01:00 AM
02:00 AM
03:00 AM
04:00 AM
05:00 AM
06:00 AM
07:00 AM
08:00 AM
09:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
01:00 PM
02:00 PM
03:00 PM
04:00 PM
05:00 PM
06:00 PM
07:00 PM
08:00 PM
09:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
3 1
1 1
0 2
0 0
0 1
0 0
12 11
11 21
44 43
50 50
77 62
80 86
107 94
108 95
102 78
103 86
104 99
111 92
113 108
86 91
55 82
51 53
30 19
9 6
2
1
1
0
1
0
12
16
44
50
70
83
101
102
90
95
102
102
111
89
69
52
25
8
2
1
1
0
1
0
12
16
44
50
70
83
101
102
90
95
102
102
111
89
69
52
25
8
Day Total 1257 1181 1226 1226
% Weekday
Average 102.5% 96.3%
% Week
Average 102.5% 96.3% 100%
AMPeak
Volume
11:00 AM 11:00 AM
80 86
11:00 AM
83
11:00 AM
83
PMPeak
Volume
6:00 PM 6:00 PM
113 108
6:00 PM
111
6:00 PM
111
Comments:
Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net)
203
Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data
Page 1 of 1
LOCATION: Business Access west of Great Plains Blvd/Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140006
SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: EB
CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025
Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25
Average Weekday
Hourly Traffic
Sat Sun Average Week
Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile
12:00 AM
01:00 AM
02:00 AM
03:00 AM
04:00 AM
05:00 AM
06:00 AM
07:00 AM
08:00 AM
09:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
01:00 PM
02:00 PM
03:00 PM
04:00 PM
05:00 PM
06:00 PM
07:00 PM
08:00 PM
09:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
7 7
1 1
2 3
0 0
4 3
11 10
40 52
102 95
149 158
135 117
126 145
167 186
184 168
150 131
128 151
183 160
197 196
169 161
131 128
82 85
68 57
55 41
21 13
15 10
7
1
3
0
4
11
46
99
154
126
136
177
176
141
140
172
197
165
130
84
63
48
17
13
7
1
3
0
4
11
46
99
154
126
136
177
176
141
140
172
197
165
130
84
63
48
17
13
Day Total 2127 2078 2110 2110
% Weekday
Average 100.8% 98.5%
% Week
Average 100.8% 98.5% 100%
AMPeak
Volume
11:00 AM 11:00 AM
167 186
11:00 AM
177
11:00 AM
177
PMPeak
Volume
4:00 PM 4:00 PM
197 196
4:00 PM
197
4:00 PM
197
Comments:
Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net)
204
Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data
Page 1 of 1
LOCATION: Business Access west of Great Plains Blvd/Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140006
SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: EB, WB
CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025
Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25
Average Weekday
Hourly Traffic
Sat Sun Average Week
Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile
12:00 AM
01:00 AM
02:00 AM
03:00 AM
04:00 AM
05:00 AM
06:00 AM
07:00 AM
08:00 AM
09:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
01:00 PM
02:00 PM
03:00 PM
04:00 PM
05:00 PM
06:00 PM
07:00 PM
08:00 PM
09:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
12 13
2 3
2 5
2 1
13 8
33 24
96 129
265 264
349 347
271 273
266 295
321 367
398 368
306 295
285 300
354 340
359 362
339 336
264 271
201 173
120 135
101 92
42 36
26 17
13
3
4
2
11
29
113
265
348
272
281
344
383
301
293
347
361
338
268
187
128
97
39
22
13
3
4
2
11
29
113
265
348
272
281
344
383
301
293
347
361
338
268
187
128
97
39
22
Day Total 4427 4454 4449 4449
% Weekday
Average 99.5% 100.1%
% Week
Average 99.5% 100.1% 100%
AMPeak
Volume
8:00 AM 11:00 AM
349 367
8:00 AM
348
8:00 AM
348
PMPeak
Volume
12:00 PM 12:00 PM
398 368
12:00 PM
383
12:00 PM
383
Comments:
Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net)
205
Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data
Page 1 of 1
LOCATION: Business Access west of Great Plains Blvd/Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140006
SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: WB
CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025
Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25
Average Weekday
Hourly Traffic
Sat Sun Average Week
Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile
12:00 AM
01:00 AM
02:00 AM
03:00 AM
04:00 AM
05:00 AM
06:00 AM
07:00 AM
08:00 AM
09:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
01:00 PM
02:00 PM
03:00 PM
04:00 PM
05:00 PM
06:00 PM
07:00 PM
08:00 PM
09:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
5 6
1 2
0 2
2 1
9 5
22 14
56 77
163 169
200 189
136 156
140 150
154 181
214 200
156 164
157 149
171 180
162 166
170 175
133 143
119 88
52 78
46 51
21 23
11 7
6
2
1
2
7
18
67
166
195
146
145
168
207
160
153
176
164
173
138
104
65
49
22
9
6
2
1
2
7
18
67
166
195
146
145
168
207
160
153
176
164
173
138
104
65
49
22
9
Day Total 2300 2376 2343 2343
% Weekday
Average 98.2% 101.4%
% Week
Average 98.2% 101.4% 100%
AMPeak
Volume
8:00 AM 8:00 AM
200 189
8:00 AM
195
8:00 AM
195
PMPeak
Volume
12:00 PM 12:00 PM
214 200
12:00 PM
207
12:00 PM
207
Comments:
Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net)
206
Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data
Page 1 of 1
LOCATION: Lake Dr E south of Business Acc/Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140007
SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: NB
CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025
Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25
Average Weekday
Hourly Traffic
Sat Sun Average Week
Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile
12:00 AM
01:00 AM
02:00 AM
03:00 AM
04:00 AM
05:00 AM
06:00 AM
07:00 AM
08:00 AM
09:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
01:00 PM
02:00 PM
03:00 PM
04:00 PM
05:00 PM
06:00 PM
07:00 PM
08:00 PM
09:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
3 5
1 3
1 0
3 1
12 11
27 20
66 74
152 130
189 184
204 210
209 221
260 285
334 306
255 255
288 242
274 312
307 279
321 313
264 243
186 181
98 120
81 79
38 18
5 10
4
2
1
2
12
24
70
141
187
207
215
273
320
255
265
293
293
317
254
184
109
80
28
8
4
2
1
2
12
24
70
141
187
207
215
273
320
255
265
293
293
317
254
184
109
80
28
8
Day Total 3578 3502 3544 3544
% Weekday
Average 101% 98.8%
% Week
Average 101% 98.8% 100%
AMPeak
Volume
11:00 AM 11:00 AM
260 285
11:00 AM
273
11:00 AM
273
PMPeak
Volume
12:00 PM 5:00 PM
334 313
12:00 PM
320
12:00 PM
320
Comments:
Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net)
207
Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data
Page 1 of 1
LOCATION: Lake Dr E south of Business Acc/Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140007
SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: NB, SB
CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025
Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25
Average Weekday
Hourly Traffic
Sat Sun Average Week
Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile
12:00 AM
01:00 AM
02:00 AM
03:00 AM
04:00 AM
05:00 AM
06:00 AM
07:00 AM
08:00 AM
09:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
01:00 PM
02:00 PM
03:00 PM
04:00 PM
05:00 PM
06:00 PM
07:00 PM
08:00 PM
09:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
8 8
4 4
2 3
4 1
12 13
34 25
97 100
213 224
371 357
379 374
421 431
503 541
587 579
520 478
529 478
534 559
576 571
577 569
497 466
368 371
226 270
163 156
80 37
20 20
8
4
3
3
13
30
99
219
364
377
426
522
583
499
504
547
574
573
482
370
248
160
59
20
8
4
3
3
13
30
99
219
364
377
426
522
583
499
504
547
574
573
482
370
248
160
59
20
Day Total 6725 6635 6687 6687
% Weekday
Average 100.6% 99.2%
% Week
Average 100.6% 99.2% 100%
AMPeak
Volume
11:00 AM 11:00 AM
503 541
11:00 AM
522
11:00 AM
522
PMPeak
Volume
12:00 PM 12:00 PM
587 579
12:00 PM
583
12:00 PM
583
Comments:
Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net)
208
Type of report: Midblock Count - Volume Data
Page 1 of 1
LOCATION: Lake Dr E south of Business Acc/Lake Dr E QC JOB #: 17140007
SPECIFIC LOCATION: DIRECTION: SB
CITY/STATE: Chanhassen, MN DATE: Jul 1 2025 - Jul 2 2025
Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
1 Jul 25 2 Jul 25
Average Weekday
Hourly Traffic
Sat Sun Average Week
Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile
12:00 AM
01:00 AM
02:00 AM
03:00 AM
04:00 AM
05:00 AM
06:00 AM
07:00 AM
08:00 AM
09:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
01:00 PM
02:00 PM
03:00 PM
04:00 PM
05:00 PM
06:00 PM
07:00 PM
08:00 PM
09:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM
5 3
3 1
1 3
1 0
0 2
7 5
31 26
61 94
182 173
175 164
212 210
243 256
253 273
265 223
241 236
260 247
269 292
256 256
233 223
182 190
128 150
82 77
42 19
15 10
4
2
2
1
1
6
29
78
178
170
211
250
263
244
239
254
281
256
228
186
139
80
31
13
4
2
2
1
1
6
29
78
178
170
211
250
263
244
239
254
281
256
228
186
139
80
31
13
Day Total 3147 3133 3146 3146
% Weekday
Average 100% 99.6%
% Week
Average 100% 99.6% 100%
AMPeak
Volume
11:00 AM 11:00 AM
243 256
11:00 AM
250
11:00 AM
250
PMPeak
Volume
4:00 PM 4:00 PM
269 292
4:00 PM
281
4:00 PM
281
Comments:
Report generated on 7/9/2025 8:32 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net)
209
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report- Chanhassen, MN Appendix B
Appendix B: Illustrations of Crashes
210
Unit 1 was traveling northbound
on Great Plains Boulevard with the
right of way, approaching the
intersection at Lake Drive East.
Unit 2 stopped eastbound on Lake
Drive East at the stop sign. The
driver of Unit 2 did not see Unit 1
and proceeded into the
intersection, resulting in a
collision. Unit 1 struck Unit 2
within the intersection due to Unit
2 failing to yield the right of way.
Unit 1 was exiting a commercial
area on the west side of the
intersection and initially came to
a stop. The driver then
proceeded into the intersection
and struck the rear driver side of
Unit 2, which was traveling
northbound on Great Plains
Boulevard. The impact caused
Unit 2 to spin and collide with
the rear wheel and partial fender
of Unit 3, which was stopped at
the stop sign westbound on Lake
Drive East at Great Plains
Boulevard. The driver of Unit 1
admitted to being on the phone
at the time of the crash.
211
The driver of Unit 1 was traveling
southbound on Great Plains
Boulevard and attempted to make
a left turn onto Lake Drive East to
proceed eastbound. Unit 2 was
traveling northbound on Great
Plains Boulevard. As Unit 1 turned
left, a collision occurred with Unit
2. The driver of Unit 1 stated that
Unit 2 was not seen prior to
initiating the turn.
Unit 1 stopped at the stop sign at
Great Plains Boulevard and Lake
Drive East, intending to turn left
(southbound) onto Great Plains
Boulevard. Unit 2 was stopped at
the stop sign at Pond Promenade
and Great Plains Boulevard,
intending to travel straight across
the intersection onto Lake Drive
East. Unit 2 proceeded into the
intersection, and Unit 1 entered
the intersection at the same time
resulted in a collision. According
to the statement from the driver
of Unit 1, Unit 2 was not seen
prior to entering the intersection.
212
Unit 1 was attempting to cross
Great Plains Boulevard from Lake
Drive East into a private business
lot. Unit 1 did not see Unit 2
traveling southbound on Great
Plains Boulevard. Unit 2 was
unable to stop and struck Unit 1 on
the rear passenger-side quarter
panel.
213
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report- Chanhassen, MN Appendix C
Appendix C: Warrant Analysis
C-1 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
C-2 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
214
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report – Chanhassen, MN Appendix C
C-1 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
Two-Way Left Turn Warrant
Two-Way Right Turn Warrant
Multi-Way Stop Warrant
Traffic Signal Warrant
215
Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection.
Opposing Volume (VO), veh/h
2-lane roadway (English)
INPUT
Variable Value
800
700 Left-turn treatment warranted.
600
500
400
300
200 Left-turn
treatment not
100 warranted.
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h
85th percentile speed, mph: 30
Percent of left-turns in advancing volume (VA), %: 28%
Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: 334
Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: 207
OUTPUT
Variable Value
Limiting advancing volume (VA), veh/h: 339
Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay:
Left-turn treatment NOT warranted.
CALIBRATION CONSTANTS
Variable Value
Average time for making left-turn, s: 3.0
Critical headway, s: 5.0
Average time for left-turn vehicle to clear the advancing lane, s: 1.9
216
Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection.
INPUT
Roadway geometry: 2-lane roadw ay
Variable Value
Major-road speed, mph: 30
Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: 334
Right-turn volume, veh/h: 129
OUTPUT
Variable Value
Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: 3855
Guidance for determining the need for a major-road
right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway:
Do NOT add right-turn bay.
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Right-Turn Volume, veh/h 217
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
Multi-Way Stop Warrants
Project Name Intersection Control Evaluation
Project/File # 25-33064
Scenario Projected 2025
Intersection Information
Major Street (N/S Road) Great Plains Boulevard Minor Street (E/W Road) Lake Dr East
Analyzed with 2 or more approach lanes Analyzed with 1 Approach Lane
Total Approach Volume 5987 vehicles Total Approach Volume 3384 vehicles
Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings
Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied
No high speed or isolated community reduction applied to the Multi-Way Stop Warrant thresholds.
Condition A - Traffic Signal Warrant
Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied
Criteria* Traffic Signal Warranted & Justified
* Multi-way stop control may be used as an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are
being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.
Condition B - Crash Experience
Condition Satisfied? Not satisfied
Required values reached for less than 4 correctable crashes
Criteria - Crash Experience 5 or more correctable crashes in 12-month period
Condition C - Intersection Volume & Delay
Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied
Required values reached for 9 hours & 17.5 sec. average delay/veh
Criteria - Major Street (veh/hr) 300 for any 8 hours of an average day
Criteria - Minor Street (total vol-veh, ped, & bikes/hr) 200 for the same 8 hours of an average day
Criteria - Delay (average sec/veh) 30 during the highest hour
Condition D - Combination Volume, Crash Experience, & Delay
Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied
Required values reached for 12 hours, less than 4 crashes, & 17.5 sec. average delay/veh
Criteria - Major Street (veh/hr) 240 for any 8 hours of an average day
Criteria - Minor Street (total vol-veh, ped, & bikes/hr) 160 for the same 8 hours of an average day
Criteria - Crash Experience 4 or more correctable crashes in 12-month period
Criteria - Delay (average sec/veh) 24 during the highest hour
218
Intersection Information
Major Street Name Great Plains Boulevard
North/South or East/West N/S
Speed Limit 35 mph or less
# of Approach Lanes 2 or more
% of Right Turn Traffic to Include 100%
Minor Street Name Lake Dr East
# of Approach Lanes 1
% of Right Turn Traffic to Include 100%
Isolated Community < 10,000 pop No
What Additional Warrants to Consider?
Warrant 3, Peak Hour (A - Vol. and Delay) No
Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Yes
Warrant 5, School Crossing No
Warrant 6, Coordinated Signal System Yes
Warrant 7, Crash Experience Yes
Warrant 8, Roadway Network Yes
Warrant 9, Intersection Near a
Grade Crossing No
All-Way Stop Warrant Yes
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
Project Name Intersection Control Evaluation
Project/File # 25-33064
Scenario Projected 2025
219
Northbound Volume by Hour
Time Left Turns Through Right Turns Peds/Bikes
12 - 1 AM 0 1 2
1 - 2 AM 0 0 1
2 - 3 AM 0 0 1
3 - 4 AM 0 1 2
4 - 5 AM 1 4 7
5 - 6 AM 1 10 16
6 - 7 AM 3 24 39
7 - 8 AM 6 27 75
8 - 9 AM 7 81 102
9 - 10 AM 9 74 121
10 - 11 AM 9 76 124
11 - 12 PM 11 94 154
12 - 1 PM 12 200 122
1 - 2 PM 9 153 93
2 - 3 PM 10 173 105
3 - 4 PM 10 164 100
4 - 5 PM 10 117 73
5 - 6 PM 4 115 68
6 - 7 PM 10 158 96
7 - 8 PM 7 112 68
8 - 9 PM 4 59 36
9 - 10 PM 3 49 30
10 - 11 PM 1 23 14
11 - 12 AM 0 3 2
Total Vehicles (unadjusted) 3,294 0
Southbound Volume by Hour
Time Left Turns Through Right Turns Peds/Bikes
12 - 1 AM 2 1 1
1 - 2 AM 2 1 1
2 - 3 AM 1 1 0
3 - 4 AM 1 0 0
4 - 5 AM 2 1 1
5 - 6 AM 8 4 3
6 - 7 AM 29 15 12
7 - 8 AM 83 44 25 4
8 - 9 AM 94 48 47
9 - 10 AM 73 38 30
10 - 11 AM 81 42 33
11 - 12 PM 96 50 39
12 - 1 PM 56 75 85
1 - 2 PM 38 51 58
2 - 3 PM 46 61 69
3 - 4 PM 48 64 72
4 - 5 PM 75 108 124
5 - 6 PM 88 111 122
6 - 7 PM 44 59 66
7 - 8 PM 32 43 48
8 - 9 PM 23 31 35
9 - 10 PM 11 15 16
10 - 11 PM 3 4 4
11 - 12 AM 1 1 1
Total Vehicles (unadjusted) 2,693 4
Eastbound Volume by Hour
Time Left Turns Through Right Turns Peds/Bikes
12 - 1 AM 5 1 1
1 - 2 AM 1 0 0
2 - 3 AM 1 0 0
3 - 4 AM 0 0 0
4 - 5 AM 3 1 1
5 - 6 AM 7 2 2
6 - 7 AM 27 7 7
7 - 8 AM 6 5 0 4
8 - 9 AM 30 4 9
9 - 10 AM 90 23 23
10 - 11 AM 84 21 21
11 - 12 PM 111 28 28
12 - 1 PM 138 24 22
1 - 2 PM 112 20 18
2 - 3 PM 96 17 15
3 - 4 PM 137 24 22
4 - 5 PM 79 15 11
5 - 6 PM 82 13 15
6 - 7 PM 98 17 16
7 - 8 PM 61 11 10
8 - 9 PM 51 9 8
9 - 10 PM 41 7 7
10 - 11 PM 16 3 3
11 - 12 AM 11 2 2
Total Vehicles (unadjusted) 1,779 4
Westbound Volume by Hour
Time Left Turns Through Right Turns Peds/Bikes
12 - 1 AM 2 0 1
1 - 2 AM 1 0 0
2 - 3 AM 0 0 0
3 - 4 AM 0 0 0
4 - 5 AM 0 0 0
5 - 6 AM 0 0 0
6 - 7 AM 6 1 5
7 - 8 AM 63 11 29
8 - 9 AM 64 13 70
9 - 10 AM 25 5 20
10 - 11 AM 39 7 30
11 - 12 PM 41 8 32
12 - 1 PM 54 14 39
1 - 2 PM 54 14 40
2 - 3 PM 51 13 37
3 - 4 PM 52 13 38
4 - 5 PM 98 26 74
5 - 6 PM 87 22 61
6 - 7 PM 57 15 41
7 - 8 PM 43 11 32
8 - 9 PM 28 7 20
9 - 10 PM 26 7 19
10 - 11 PM 15 4 11
11 - 12 AM 5 1 3
Total Vehicles (unadjusted) 1,605 0
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
Great Plains Boulevard (Major Street) Volume
Lake Dr East (Minor Street) Volume
220
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
Warrants 1 - 3 (Volume Warrants)
Figure 4C-1 (Warrant 2) & Figure 4C-3 (Warrant 3)
Project Name Intersection Control Evaluation
Project/File # 25-33064
Scenario Projected 2025
Intersection Information
Major Street (N/S Road) Great Plains Boulevard Minor Street (E/W Road) Lake Dr East
Analyzed with 2 or more approach lanes Analyzed with 1 Approach Lane
Total Approach Volume 5987 vehicles Total Approach Volume 3384 vehicles
Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings
Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied
No high speed or isolated community reduction applied to the Volume Warrant thresholds.
Warrant 1, Eight Hour Vehicular Volume
Condition A Condition B Condition A+B*
Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Not Satisfied Not Satisfied
Required values reached for 0 hours 0 hours 3 (Cond. A) & 0 (Cond. B)
Criteria - Major Street (veh/hr) 600 900 480 (Cond. A) & 720 (Cond. B)
Criteria - Minor Street (veh/hr) 150 75 120 (Cond. A) & 60 (Cond. B)
* Should be applied only after an adequate trial of other alternatives that could cause less delay and inconvenience to
traffic has failed to solve the traffic problems.
Warrant 2, Four Hour Vehicular Volume
Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied
Required values reached for 0 hours
Criteria See Figure Below
Warrant 3, Peak Hour Vehicular Volume
Condition A Condition B
Condition Satisfied? Not Examined Not Satisfied
Required values reached for 0 hours
Criteria - Total Approach Volume (veh in one hour)
See Figure Below Criteria - Minor Street High Side Volume (veh in one hour)
Criteria - Minor Street High Side Delay (veh-hrs)
1,000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Major Street Volume (Both Approaches)
Warrant 2 Threshold Warrant 3 Threshold Intersection Volumes Minor Street Volume (High Approach Only) Pedestrian Crossing Volume 221
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
Warrants 4 to 6 (Pedestrian, School, Coordinated Systems)
Figure 4C-5 & Figure 4C-7 (Warrant 4 Four Hour & Peak Hour)
Project Name Intersection Control Evaluation
Project/File # 25-33064
Scenario Projected 2025
Intersection Information
Major Street (N/S Road) Great Plains Boulevard Minor Street (E/W Road) Lake Dr East
Analyzed with 2 or more approach lanes Analyzed with 1 Approach Lane
Total Approach Volume 5987 vehicles Total Approach Volume 3384 vehicles
Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings
Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied
No high speed or isolated community reduction applied to the Pedestrian Warrant thresholds.
Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume
Condition A - Four Hour Vol. Condition B - Peak Hour Vol.
Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Not Satisfied
Required values reached for 0 hours 0 hours
Criteria - Min. Distance to Nearest Controlled Crossing 300 feet, unless progressive movement not impacted
Criteria - Major Street Volume and Crossing Volume See Figure Below
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Major Street Volume (Both Approaches)
Warrant 5, School Crossing
Condition Satisfied? Not Examined
Criteria - School Crossing Data
Warrant 6, Coordinated Signal System
Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied
Criteria - Coordinated Signal System - If one-way, the adjacent traffic control signals are too far apart to
provide the necessary degree of vehicular platooning.
Ped Vol 4-Hour Threshold Ped Vol Peak Hour Threshold Intersection Volumes Pedestrian Crossing Volume 222
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
Warrants 7-9 (Crash, Network, Rail Crossing)
Figure 4C-10 (Two or More Approach Lanes): Distance D = 70 feet
Project Name Intersection Control Evaluation
Project/File # 25-33064
Scenario Projected 2025
Intersection Information
Major Street (N/S Road) Great Plains Boulevard Minor Street (E/W Road) Lake Dr East
Analyzed with 2 or more approach lanes Analyzed with 1 Approach Lane
Total Approach Volume 5987 vehicles Total Approach Volume 3384 vehicles
Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings
Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied
Reduction applied to Crash and Roadway Network Warrant thresholds due to high speed on Great Plains Boulevard.
Warrant 7, Crash Experience
Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied
Required values reached for Alternatives tried, 4 or less correctable crashes, 3 hours (Veh. Vol.), 0
hours (Ped 4-Hour), and 0 hours (Ped Peak Hour)
Criteria - Alternatives Adequate trial has failed to reduce the crash frequency
Criteria - Reported Crashes (within 12-month period) 5 or more crashes susceptible to correction by a traffic control signal
Criteria - Major Street (veh/hr)
- Minor Street (veh/hr)
From Warrant 1: 480 (Cond. A), 720 (Cond. B)
From Warrant 1: 120 (Cond. A), 60 (Cond. B)
(Alternative Volume Requirement) Criteria - Pedestrian Volume 80 percent of the Pedestrian Volume Warrant requirements
Warrant 8, Roadway Network
Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied
Required values reached for Not an intersection of 2 major routes and satisfies volume/warrant
requirements
Criteria - Common Intersection of Two Major Routes - Part of the street or highway system, or
- Includes rural or suburban highways outside, entering, or traversing
a city, or
- Appears as or major route on an official plan.
Criteria - Existing or Immediately Projected Entering Volume 1,000 or more vehicles per typical peak hour
Criteria - Warrants Satisfies Warrants 1, 2, or 3 with 5-year projected volumes
(Alternative Requirement) Criteria - Non-normal Business Day 1,000 or more vehicles per hour for any 5 hours
Warrant 9, Intersection Near a Grade Crossing
Condition Satisfied? Not Examined
Required values reached for
Criteria - Alternatives
Criteria - Max. Distance to Nearest Controlled Crossing
Criteria - Major Street Volume and Crossing Volume
200
150
100
50
0
0 100 200 Maj3o0r0Street Volum4e00(Both Approa5c0h0es)- Vehicle6s0p0er Hour 700 800 900
Grade Crossing Threshold Intersection Volume Minor Street, Crossing Approach Equivalent Vehicles per Hour 223
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report- Chanhassen, MN Appendix C
C-2 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
Two-Way Left Turn Warrant
Two-Way Right Turn Warrant
Multi-Way Stop Warrant
Traffic Signal Warrant
224
Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection.
Opposing Volume (VO), veh/h
2-lane roadway (English)
INPUT
Variable Value
800
700 Left-turn treatment warranted.
600
500
400
300
200 Left-turn
treatment not
100 warranted.
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h
85th percentile speed, mph: 30
Percent of left-turns in advancing volume (VA), %: 28%
Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: 491
Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: 303
OUTPUT
Variable Value
Limiting advancing volume (VA), veh/h: 305
Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay:
Left-turn treatment warranted.
CALIBRATION CONSTANTS
Variable Value
Average time for making left-turn, s: 3.0
Critical headway, s: 5.0
Average time for left-turn vehicle to clear the advancing lane, s: 1.9
225
Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection.
INPUT
Roadway geometry: 2-lane roadw ay
Variable Value
Major-road speed, mph: 30
Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: 491
Right-turn volume, veh/h: 190
OUTPUT
Variable Value
Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: 602
Guidance for determining the need for a major-road
right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway:
Do NOT add right-turn bay.
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Right-Turn Volume, veh/h 226
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
Multi-Way Stop Warrants
Project Name Intersection Control Evaluation
Project/File # 25-33064
Scenario Projected 2045
Intersection Information
Major Street (N/S Road) Great Plains Boulevard Minor Street (E/W Road) Lake Dr East
Analyzed with 2 or more approach lanes Analyzed with 1 Approach Lane
Total Approach Volume 8808.39167281362 vehicles Total Approach Volume 3551.5319346833 vehicles
Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings
Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied
No high speed or isolated community reduction applied to the Multi-Way Stop Warrant thresholds.
Condition A - Traffic Signal Warrant
Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied
Criteria* Traffic Signal Warranted & Justified
* Multi-way stop control may be used as an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are
being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.
Condition B - Crash Experience
Condition Satisfied? Not satisfied
Required values reached for less than 4 correctable crashes
Criteria - Crash Experience 5 or more correctable crashes in 12-month period
Condition C - Intersection Volume & Delay
Condition Satisfied? Satisfied
Required values reached for 10 hours & 32 sec. average delay/veh
Criteria - Major Street (veh/hr) 300 for any 8 hours of an average day
Criteria - Minor Street (total vol-veh, ped, & bikes/hr) 200 for the same 8 hours of an average day
Criteria - Delay (average sec/veh) 30 during the highest hour
Condition D - Combination Volume, Crash Experience, & Delay
Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied
Required values reached for 12 hours, less than 4 crashes, & 32 sec. average delay/veh
Criteria - Major Street (veh/hr) 240 for any 8 hours of an average day
Criteria - Minor Street (total vol-veh, ped, & bikes/hr) 160 for the same 8 hours of an average day
Criteria - Crash Experience 4 or more correctable crashes in 12-month period
Criteria - Delay (average sec/veh) 24 during the highest hour
227
Intersection Information
Major Street Name Great Plains Boulevard
North/South or East/West N/S
Speed Limit 35 mph or less
# of Approach Lanes 2 or more
% of Right Turn Traffic to Include 100%
Minor Street Name Lake Dr East
# of Approach Lanes 1
% of Right Turn Traffic to Include 100%
Isolated Community < 10,000 pop No
What Additional Warrants to Consider?
Warrant 3, Peak Hour (A - Vol. and Delay) No
Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Yes
Warrant 5, School Crossing No
Warrant 6, Coordinated Signal System Yes
Warrant 7, Crash Experience Yes
Warrant 8, Roadway Network Yes
Warrant 9, Intersection Near a
Grade Crossing No
All-Way Stop Warrant Yes
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
Project Name Intersection Control Evaluation
Project/File # 25-33064
Scenario Projected 2045
228
Northbound Volume by Hour
Time Left Turns Through Right Turns Peds/Bikes
12 - 1 AM 0 2 3
1 - 2 AM 0 1 1
2 - 3 AM 0 1 1
3 - 4 AM 0 2 3
4 - 5 AM 1 6 10
5 - 6 AM 2 14 24
6 - 7 AM 4 35 58
7 - 8 AM 9 40 110
8 - 9 AM 10 119 150
9 - 10 AM 13 109 178
10 - 11 AM 13 111 182
11 - 12 PM 17 139 227
12 - 1 PM 18 289 184
1 - 2 PM 14 221 140
2 - 3 PM 15 249 159
3 - 4 PM 15 237 151
4 - 5 PM 15 172 107
5 - 6 PM 6 169 110
6 - 7 PM 14 228 145
7 - 8 PM 10 161 102
8 - 9 PM 5 85 54
9 - 10 PM 4 70 45
10 - 11 PM 2 33 21
11 - 12 AM 0 4 3
Total Vehicles (unadjusted) 4,851 0
Southbound Volume by Hour
Time Left Turns Through Right Turns Peds/Bikes
12 - 1 AM 2 1 1
1 - 2 AM 2 1 1
2 - 3 AM 2 1 1
3 - 4 AM 1 0 0
4 - 5 AM 2 1 1
5 - 6 AM 11 6 5
6 - 7 AM 43 22 17
7 - 8 AM 122 65 37
8 - 9 AM 138 71 69 4
9 - 10 AM 107 56 43
10 - 11 AM 119 62 48
11 - 12 PM 141 74 57
12 - 1 PM 82 111 124
1 - 2 PM 56 75 85
2 - 3 PM 67 90 101
3 - 4 PM 70 94 106
4 - 5 PM 110 159 182
5 - 6 PM 129 163 179
6 - 7 PM 64 87 97
7 - 8 PM 47 63 71
8 - 9 PM 34 46 52
9 - 10 PM 16 22 24
10 - 11 PM 4 6 6
11 - 12 AM 1 1 1
Total Vehicles (unadjusted) 3,957 4
Eastbound Volume by Hour
Time Left Turns Through Right Turns Peds/Bikes
12 - 1 AM 5 1 1
1 - 2 AM 1 0 0
2 - 3 AM 1 0 0
3 - 4 AM 0 0 0
4 - 5 AM 3 1 1
5 - 6 AM 7 2 2
6 - 7 AM 27 7 7
7 - 8 AM 6 5 0 4
8 - 9 AM 30 4 9
9 - 10 AM 90 23 23
10 - 11 AM 84 21 21
11 - 12 PM 111 28 28
12 - 1 PM 123 31 31
1 - 2 PM 100 25 25
2 - 3 PM 85 21 21
3 - 4 PM 122 31 31
4 - 5 PM 79 15 11
5 - 6 PM 82 13 15
6 - 7 PM 98 17 16
7 - 8 PM 61 11 10
8 - 9 PM 51 9 8
9 - 10 PM 41 7 7
10 - 11 PM 16 3 3
11 - 12 AM 11 2 2
Total Vehicles (unadjusted) 1,779 4
Westbound Volume by Hour
Time Left Turns Through Right Turns Peds/Bikes
12 - 1 AM 2 0 1
1 - 2 AM 1 0 0
2 - 3 AM 0 0 0
3 - 4 AM 0 0 0
4 - 5 AM 0 0 0
5 - 6 AM 0 0 0
6 - 7 AM 7 1 5
7 - 8 AM 70 12 32
8 - 9 AM 71 14 77
9 - 10 AM 28 5 22
10 - 11 AM 43 8 34
11 - 12 PM 45 8 35
12 - 1 PM 60 11 47
1 - 2 PM 61 11 47
2 - 3 PM 58 11 45
3 - 4 PM 58 11 45
4 - 5 PM 108 29 82
5 - 6 PM 96 24 67
6 - 7 PM 63 16 46
7 - 8 PM 48 12 35
8 - 9 PM 31 8 22
9 - 10 PM 28 7 21
10 - 11 PM 17 4 12
11 - 12 AM 5 1 4
Total Vehicles (unadjusted) 1,773 0
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
Great Plains Boulevard (Major Street) Volume
Lake Dr East (Minor Street) Volume
229
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
Warrants 1 - 3 (Volume Warrants)
Figure 4C-1 (Warrant 2) & Figure 4C-3 (Warrant 3)
Project Name Intersection Control Evaluation
Project/File # 25-33064
Scenario Projected 2045
Intersection Information
Major Street (N/S Road) Great Plains Boulevard Minor Street (E/W Road) Lake Dr East
Analyzed with 2 or more approach lanes Analyzed with 1 Approach Lane
Total Approach Volume 8808.39167281362 vehicles Total Approach Volume 3551.5319346833 vehicles
Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings
Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied
No high speed or isolated community reduction applied to the Volume Warrant thresholds.
Warrant 1, Eight Hour Vehicular Volume
Condition A Condition B Condition A+B*
Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Not Satisfied Not Satisfied
Required values reached for 5 hours 0 hours 11 (Cond. A) & 3 (Cond. B)
Criteria - Major Street (veh/hr) 600 900 480 (Cond. A) & 720 (Cond. B)
Criteria - Minor Street (veh/hr) 150 75 120 (Cond. A) & 60 (Cond. B)
* Should be applied only after an adequate trial of other alternatives that could cause less delay and inconvenience to
traffic has failed to solve the traffic problems.
Warrant 2, Four Hour Vehicular Volume
Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied
Required values reached for 0 hours
Criteria See Figure Below
Warrant 3, Peak Hour Vehicular Volume
Condition A Condition B
Condition Satisfied? Not Examined Not Satisfied
Required values reached for 0 hours
Criteria - Total Approach Volume (veh in one hour)
See Figure Below Criteria - Minor Street High Side Volume (veh in one hour)
Criteria - Minor Street High Side Delay (veh-hrs)
1,000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Major Street Volume (Both Approaches)
Warrant 2 Threshold Warrant 3 Threshold Intersection Volumes Minor Street Volume (High Approach Only) Pedestrian Crossing Volume 230
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
Warrants 4 to 6 (Pedestrian, School, Coordinated Systems)
Figure 4C-5 & Figure 4C-7 (Warrant 4 Four Hour & Peak Hour)
Project Name Intersection Control Evaluation
Project/File # 25-33064
Scenario Projected 2045
Intersection Information
Major Street (N/S Road) Great Plains Boulevard Minor Street (E/W Road) Lake Dr East
Analyzed with 2 or more approach lanes Analyzed with 1 Approach Lane
Total Approach Volume 8808.39167281362 vehicles Total Approach Volume 3551.5319346833 vehicles
Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings
Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied
No high speed or isolated community reduction applied to the Pedestrian Warrant thresholds.
Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume
Condition A - Four Hour Vol. Condition B - Peak Hour Vol.
Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Not Satisfied
Required values reached for 0 hours 0 hours
Criteria - Min. Distance to Nearest Controlled Crossing 300 feet, unless progressive movement not impacted
Criteria - Major Street Volume and Crossing Volume See Figure Below
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Major Street Volume (Both Approaches)
Warrant 5, School Crossing
Condition Satisfied? Not Examined
Criteria - School Crossing Data
Warrant 6, Coordinated Signal System
Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied
Criteria - Coordinated Signal System - If one-way, the adjacent traffic control signals are too far apart to
provide the necessary degree of vehicular platooning.
Ped Vol 4-Hour Threshold Ped Vol Peak Hour Threshold Intersection Volumes Pedestrian Crossing Volume 231
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
Warrants 7-9 (Crash, Network, Rail Crossing)
Figure 4C-10 (Two or More Approach Lanes): Distance D = 70 feet
Project Name Intersection Control Evaluation
Project/File # 25-33064
Scenario Projected 2045
Intersection Information
Major Street (N/S Road) Great Plains Boulevard Minor Street (E/W Road) Lake Dr East
Analyzed with 2 or more approach lanes Analyzed with 1 Approach Lane
Total Approach Volume 8808.39167281362 vehicles Total Approach Volume 3551.5319346833 vehicles
Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings Total Ped/Bike Volume 4 crossings
Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied
Reduction applied to Crash and Roadway Network Warrant thresholds due to high speed on Great Plains Boulevard.
Warrant 7, Crash Experience
Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied
Required values reached for Alternatives not tried, 4 or less correctable crashes, 11 hours (Veh.
Vol.), 0 hours (Ped 4-Hour), and 0 hours (Ped Peak Hour)
Criteria - Alternatives Adequate trial has failed to reduce the crash frequency
Criteria - Reported Crashes (within 12-month period) 5 or more crashes susceptible to correction by a traffic control signal
Criteria - Major Street (veh/hr)
- Minor Street (veh/hr)
From Warrant 1: 480 (Cond. A), 720 (Cond. B)
From Warrant 1: 120 (Cond. A), 60 (Cond. B)
(Alternative Volume Requirement) Criteria - Pedestrian Volume 80 percent of the Pedestrian Volume Warrant requirements
Warrant 8, Roadway Network
Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied
Required values reached for Not an intersection of 2 major routes, but does not satisfy
volume/warrant or alternative volume requirements
Criteria - Common Intersection of Two Major Routes - Part of the street or highway system, or
- Includes rural or suburban highways outside, entering, or traversing
a city, or
- Appears as or major route on an official plan.
Criteria - Existing or Immediately Projected Entering Volume 1,000 or more vehicles per typical peak hour
Criteria - Warrants Satisfies Warrants 1, 2, or 3 with 5-year projected volumes
(Alternative Requirement) Criteria - Non-normal Business Day 1,000 or more vehicles per hour for any 5 hours
Warrant 9, Intersection Near a Grade Crossing
Condition Satisfied? Not Examined
Required values reached for
Criteria - Alternatives
Criteria - Max. Distance to Nearest Controlled Crossing
Criteria - Major Street Volume and Crossing Volume
200
150
100
50
0
0 100 200 Maj3o0r0Street Volum4e00(Both Approa5c0h0es) - Vehicle6s0p0er Hour 700 800 900
Grade Crossing Threshold Intersection Volume Minor Street, Crossing Approach Equivalent Vehicles per Hour 232
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report- Chanhassen, MN Appendix D
Appendix D: Synchro Capacity Analysis
D-1 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
D-2 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
233
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report- Chanhassen, MN Appendix D
D-1 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC)
All-Way Stop Control (AWSC)
Traffic Signal
Roundabout
234
HCM 6th TWSC
1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd 07/21/2025
Synchro 11 Report
Page 1
2025 Existing - TWSC Baseline
M M
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 93 11 16 95 27 68 6 125 82 94 111 129
Future Vol, veh/h 93 11 16 95 27 68 6 125 82 94 111 129
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - 160 - 80
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 101 12 17 103 29 74 7 136 89 102 121 140
Major/Minor Mi inor1 Major1 ajor2
Conflicting Flow All 564 121 605 660 113 261 0 0 225 0 0
Stage 1 325 - 195 195 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 239 - 410 465 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.5 6.2 7.3 6.5 6.9 4.1 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 438 936 399 386 925 1315 - - -
Stage 1 653 - 794 743 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 711 - 623 566 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 403 936 359 355 925 1315 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 403 - 359 355 - - - - -
Stage 1 604 - 789 739 - - - - -
Stage 2 707 - 554 524 - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 15.9 19.1 0.2 2.2
HCM LOS C C
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - - 0.283 0.45 0.075 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - 15.9 19.1 7.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A - C C A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 1.2 2.3 0.2 - -
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1315 - - 461 459 1356 - -
235
Queuing and Blocking Report
Baseline 07/21/2025
SimTraffic Report
Page 1
2025 Existing - TWSC
Intersection: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd
Movement EB WB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR L
Maximum Queue (ft) 51 68 25
Average Queue (ft) 30 51 13
95th Queue (ft) 57 77 38
Link Distance (ft) 264 710
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
236
HCM 6th AWSC
1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd 07/21/2025
Synchro 11 Report
Page 1
2025 Existing - AWSC 10:58 am 07/21/2025
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 11
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 93 11 16 95 27 68 6 125 82 94 111 129
Future Vol, veh/h 93 11 16 95 27 68 6 125 82 94 111 129
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 101 12 17 103 29 74 7 136 89 102 121 140
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 3 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 2 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 3 1 1
HCM Control Delay 11.7 12.6 10.9 10
HCM LOS B B B A
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3
Vol Left, % 9% 0% 78% 50% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 91% 43% 9% 14% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 57% 13% 36% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 69 145 120 190 94 111 129
LT Vol 6 0 93 95 94 0 0
Through Vol 63 63 11 27 0 111 0
RT Vol 0 82 16 68 0 0 129
Lane Flow Rate 74 157 130 207 102 121 140
Geometry Grp 8 8 7 7 7 7 7
Degree of Util (X) 0.137 0.27 0.244 0.362 0.184 0.201 0.205
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.621 6.188 6.74 6.309 6.493 5.985 5.274
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 540 578 532 570 552 598 679
Service Time 4.38 3.947 4.497 4.059 4.243 3.734 3.023
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.137 0.272 0.244 0.363 0.185 0.202 0.206
HCM Control Delay 10.4 11.2 11.7 12.6 10.7 10.2 9.4
HCM Lane LOS B B B B B B A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 1.1 1 1.6 0.7 0.7 0.8
237
Queuing and Blocking Report
SimTraffic Report
Page 1
2025 Existing - AWSC
07/21/2025
Intersection: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd
Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LT TR L T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 44 50 34 52 35 49 45
Average Queue (ft) 27 39 28 36 32 36 34
95th Queue (ft) 48 57 48 56 39 56 49
Link Distance (ft) 264 710 188 188 467
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 80
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
238
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd 07/21/2025
Synchro 11 Report
Page 1
2025 Existing - Signal 5:00 pm 07/21/2025 Baseline
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 93 11 16 95 27 68 6 125 82 94 111 129
Future Volume (vph) 93 11 16 95 27 68 6 125 82 94 111 12
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 150 150 150 150 150 150 160 8
Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 120
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.982 0.952 0.942 0.850
Flt Protected 0.963 0.976 0.998 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1797 0 0 1765 0 0 3311 0 1805 1900 1615
Flt Permitted 0.670 0.823 0.950 0.607
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1250 0 0 1489 0 0 3152 0 1153 1900 1615
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Ye
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 17 66 89 14
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 315 759 248 576
Travel Time (s) 7.2 17.3 5.6 13.1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 5% 0% 0% 0%
Adj. Flow (vph) 101 12 17 103 29 74 7 136 89 102 121 14
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 130 0 0 206 0 0 232 0 102 121 14
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Righ
Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 18
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Righ
Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 2
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 2
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+E
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 2 6
239
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd 07/21/2025
Synchro 11 Report
Page 2
2025 Existing - Signal 5:00 pm 07/21/2025 Baseline
Intersection Signal Delay: 8.6 Intersection LOS: A
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5
Total Split (s) 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0
Total Split (%) 48.0% 48.0% 48.0% 48.0% 52.0% 52.0% 52.0% 52.0% 52.0%
Maximum Green (s) 19.5 19.5 19.5 19.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 10.5 10.5 33.4 33.4 33.4 33.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67
v/c Ratio 0.47 0.57 0.11 0.13 0.10 0.12
Control Delay 19.9 17.5 3.5 4.2 3.6 0.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 19.9 17.5 3.5 4.2 3.6 0.8
LOS B B A A A
Approach Delay 19.9 17.5 3.5 2.7
Approach LOS B B A A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 50
Actuated Cycle Length: 50
Offset: 31 (62%), Referenc ed to phase 2:NBTL an d 6:SB TL, Start of Green
Natural Cycle: 45
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.57
Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.3% ICU Level of Service A
Splits and Phases: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd
Analysis Period (min) 15
240
Queuing and Blocking Report
Baseline 07/21/2025
SimTraffic Report
Page 1
2025 Existing - Signal
Intersection: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd
Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LT TR L T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 64 112 38 52 56 56 40
Average Queue (ft) 43 72 16 28 32 29 20
95th Queue (ft) 80 125 43 60 66 66 50
Link Distance (ft) 264 710 188 188 467
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 80
Storage Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
241
Proportion of CAVs, % 0
HCS Roundabouts Report
General Information Site Information
Analyst Corona Woychik Intersection 1
Agency or Co. ISG E/W Street Name Lake Dr E/Commercial Access
Date Performed
Analysis Year
Time Analyzed
7/21/2025
2025
PM Peak Hour
N/S Street Name
Analysis Time Period, hrs
Peak Hour Factor
Great Plains Blvd
0.25
0.94
Project Description Intersection Control
Evaluation
Jurisdiction City of Chanhassen
Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
Approach EB
WB
NB
SB
Movement
Number of Lanes (N)
U L
0 0
T
1
R
0
U
0
L
0
T R U L T R U T
1
R
0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
0
Lane Assignment LTR LTR LTR LTR
Volume (V), veh/h 0 93 11 16 0 95 27 68 0 6 125 82 0 94 111 129
Percent Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0
Flow Rate (vPCE), pc/h 0 99 12 17 0 101 29 72 0 6 134 92 0 10 118 137
Right-Turn Bypass None None None None
Conflicting Lanes 1 1 1 1
Pedestrians Crossing, p/h 0 0 0 0
Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment
Approach EB WB NB SB
Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass
Critical Headway, s 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763
4.9763
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087
Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios
Approach EB WB NB SB
Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass
Entry Flow (ve), pc/h 128 202
232
355
Entry Volume, veh/h 128 202 226 355
Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h 319 239 211 136
Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h 204 172 305 236
Capacity (cpce), pc/h 997 1081 1113 1201
Capacity (c), veh/h 997 1081 1085 1201
v/c Ratio (x) 0.13 0.19 0.21 0.30
Delay and Level of Service
Approach EB WB NB SB
Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass
A
Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh 4.8
A
5.0 5.2 5.7
Lane LOS A A A A
95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) 0.4 0.7 0.8 1.2
95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)
4.8
10.0 17.5 20.4 30.0
Approach Delay, s/veh | LOS 5.0 A 5 A 5.
Intersection Delay, s/veh | LOS 5.3 A 242
Queuing and Blocking Report
Baseline 07/21/2025
Intersection: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 40 45 54 31
Average Queue (ft) 16 19 22 12
95th Queue (ft) 50 51 62 37
Link Distance (ft) 261 705 168 444
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
2025 Existing - Single Lane Roundabout SimTraffic Report
Page 1
243
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report- Chanhassen, MN Appendix D
D-2 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC)
All-Way Stop Control (AWSC)
Traffic Signal
Roundabout
244
HCM 6th TWSC
2045 Future - TWSC 4:34 pm 07/23/2025 Synchro 11 Report
Page 1
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Stage 1 567 491 - 697 673 - - - - - - -
1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd 09/17/2025
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 12.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 93 11 16 105 30 75 9 183 120 138 163 190
Future Vol, veh/h 93 11 16 105 30 75 9 183 120 138 163 190
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - - - - 160 - 80
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
Conflicting Flow All 613 826 177 879 968 165 384 0 0 329 0 0
Stage 2 136 349 - 595 684 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Stage 1 573 559 - 705 680 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 286 269 - 219 222 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 731 630 - 415 397 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 24.6 47.3 0.2 2.3
HCM LOS C E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1186 - - 312 299 1242 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - 0.418 0.763 0.121 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.1 0 - 24.6 47.3 8.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS A A - C E A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 2 5.8 0.4 - -
Mvmt Flow 101 12 17 114 33 82 10 199 130 150 177 207
Stage 1 477 477 - 284 284 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.3 6.5 6.2 7.3 6.5 6.9 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.5 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - - - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 394 310 871 257 256 857 1186 - - 1242 - -
Stage 2 859 637 - 494 452 - - - - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 286 269 871 219 222 857 1186 - - 1242 - -
245
Queuing and Blocking Report
2045 Future - TWSC SimTraffic Report
Page 1
09/17/2025
Intersection: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd
Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LT TR L R
Maximum Queue (ft) 56 91 10 9 44 9
Average Queue (ft) 34 60 3 2 30 2
95th Queue (ft) 59 97 22 11 53 12
Link Distance (ft) 264 710 188 188
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 80
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
246
HCM 6th AWSC
2045 Future - AWSC 4:39 pm 07/23/2025 Synchro 11 Report
Page 1
1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd 09/17/2025
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 13.5
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 93 11 16 105 30 75 9 183 120 138 163 190
Future Vol, veh/h 93 11 16 105 30 75 9 183 120 138 163 190
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 101 12 17 114 33 82 10 199 130 150 177 207
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 1
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 3 2
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 2 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 3 1 1
HCM Control Delay 13.5 15.8 14.2 12.1
HCM LOS B C B B
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3
Vol Left, % 9% 0% 78% 50% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 91% 43% 9% 14% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Right, % 0% 57% 13% 36% 0% 0% 100%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 101 212 120 210 138 163 190
LT Vol 9 0 93 105 138 0 0
Through Vol 92 92 11 30 0 163 0
RT Vol 0 120 16 75 0 0 190
Lane Flow Rate 109 230 130 228 150 177 207
Geometry Grp 8 8 7 7 7 7 7
Degree of Util (X) 0.223 0.442 0.28 0.455 0.294 0.322 0.335
Departure Headway (Hd) 7.35 6.914 7.719 7.169 7.06 6.549 5.834
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 488 520 466 502 512 553 620
Service Time 5.098 4.662 5.468 4.912 4.76 4.249 3.534
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.223 0.442 0.279 0.454 0.293 0.32 0.334
HCM Control Delay 12.2 15.1 13.5 15.8 12.7 12.3 11.4
HCM Lane LOS B C B C B B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.8 2.2 1.1 2.3 1.2 1.4 1.5
247
Queuing and Blocking Report
2045 Future - AWSC SimTraffic Report
Page 1
09/17/2025
Intersection: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd
Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LT TR L T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 38 63 50 63 49 57 53
Average Queue (ft) 24 48 40 41 36 41 38
95th Queue (ft) 41 70 59 68 51 61 56
Link Distance (ft) 264 710 188 188 467
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 80
Storage Blk Time (%) 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
248
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd 09/17/2025
2045 Future - Signal 4:55 pm 07/23/2025 Synchro 11 Report
Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 93 11 16 105 30 75 9 183 120 138 163 190
Future Volume (vph) 93 11 16 105 30 75 9 183 120 138 163 190
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 150 150 150 150 150 150 160 80
Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 120
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.982 0.952 0.942 0.850
Flt Protected 0.963 0.976 0.999 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1797 0 0 1765 0 0 3314 0 1805 1900 1615
Flt Permitted 0.653 0.815 0.949 0.548
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1218 0 0 1474 0 0 3148 0 1041 1900 1615
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 17 66 130 207
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 315 759 248 576
Travel Time (s) 7.2 17.3 5.6 13.1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 5% 0% 0% 0%
Adj. Flow (vph) 101 12 17 114 33 82 10 199 130 150 177 207
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 130 0 0 229 0 0 339 0 150 177 207
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 18
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right
Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm
Protected Phases 4 8 2 6
249
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd 09/17/2025
2045 Future - Signal 4:55 pm 07/23/2025 Synchro 11 Report
Page 2
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 6
Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5
Total Split (s) 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0
Total Split (%) 48.0% 48.0% 48.0% 48.0% 52.0% 52.0% 52.0% 52.0% 52.0%
Maximum Green (s) 19.5 19.5 19.5 19.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5 21.5
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 11.2 11.2 29.8 29.8 29.8 29.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60
v/c Ratio 0.45 0.60 0.18 0.24 0.16 0.20
Control Delay 18.5 18.0 3.8 6.1 4.8 1.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 18.5 18.0 3.8 6.1 4.8 1.0
LOS B B A A A A
Approach Delay 18.5 18.0 3.8 3.7
Approach LOS B B A A
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 50
Actuated Cycle Length: 50
Offset: 31 (62%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green
Natural Cycle: 45
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.60
Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.2% ICU Level of Service A
Splits and Phases: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd
Intersection Signal Delay: 8.0 Intersection LOS: A
Analysis Period (min) 15
250
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
2: Great Plains Blvd & Arboretum Blvd 09/17/2025
2045 Future - Signal 4:55 pm 07/23/2025 Synchro 11 Report
Page 3
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 250 800 125 125 800 250 200 20 70 230 100 230
Future Volume (vph) 250 800 125 125 800 250 200 20 70 230 100 230
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 640 0 520 0 140 100 0 60
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 120 180 100 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 3433 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583
Flt Permitted 0.146 0.148 0.687 0.634
Satd. Flow (perm) 272 3539 1583 276 3539 1583 2483 1863 1583 1181 1863 1583
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 207 272 207 208
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 886 714 576 253
Travel Time (s) 20.1 16.2 13.1 5.8
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Adj. Flow (vph) 272 870 136 136 870 272 217 22 76 250 109 250
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 272 870 136 136 870 272 217 22 76 250 109 250
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 36 36 30 30
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6
251
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
2: Great Plains Blvd & Arboretum Blvd 09/17/2025
2045 Future - Signal 4:55 pm 07/23/2025 Synchro 11 Report
Page 4
Natural Cycle: 100
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 10.0
Minimum Split (s) 10.5 32.5 32.5 10.5 32.5 32.5 10.5 32.5 32.5 23.5 32.5 32.5
Total Split (s) 11.0 32.9 32.9 10.6 32.5 32.5 10.6 33.0 33.0 23.5 45.9 45.9
Total Split (%) 11.0% 32.9% 32.9% 10.6% 32.5% 32.5% 10.6% 33.0% 33.0% 23.5% 45.9% 45.9%
Maximum Green (s) 5.5 27.4 27.4 5.1 27.0 27.0 5.1 27.5 27.5 18.0 40.4 40.4
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None None None None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 32.9 27.4 27.4 32.1 27.0 27.0 37.0 31.9 31.9 50.7 40.4 40.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.27 0.27 0.32 0.27 0.27 0.37 0.32 0.32 0.51 0.40 0.40
v/c Ratio 1.59 0.90 0.23 0.83 0.91 0.44 0.22 0.04 0.12 0.37 0.14 0.33
Control Delay 315.4 48.4 1.7 62.8 50.3 6.0 13.8 24.2 0.9 15.8 19.6 5.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 315.4 48.4 1.7 62.8 50.3 6.0 13.8 24.2 0.9 15.8 19.6 5.8
LOS F D A E D A B C A B B A
Approach Delay 100.2 42.2 11.4 12.4
Approach LOS F D B B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 100
Offset: 24 (24%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Intersection Signal Delay: 55.5 Intersection LOS: E
Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 2: Great Plains Blvd & Arboretum Blvd
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.59
Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.1% ICU Level of Service C
252
Queuing and Blocking Report
2045 Future - Signal SimTraffic Report
Page 1
09/17/2025
Intersection: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd
Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LT TR L T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 68 152 59 71 69 61 55
Average Queue (ft) 42 88 27 37 46 31 29
95th Queue (ft) 76 158 66 84 81 75 65
Link Distance (ft) 264 710 188 188 467
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160 80
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0
253
HCS Roundabouts Report
General Information Site Information
Analyst Corona Woychik Intersection 1
Agency or Co. ISG E/W Street Name Lake Dr E/Commercial Access
Date Performed 7/21/2025 N/S Street Name Great Plains Blvd
Analysis Year 2045 Analysis Time Period, hrs 0.25
Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.94
Project Description Intersection Control
Evaluation
Jurisdiction City of Chanhassen
Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics
Approach EB WB NB SB
Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R
Number of Lanes (N) 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Lane Assignment LTR LTR LTR LTR
Volume (V), veh/h 0 93 11 16 0 105 30 75 0 9 183 120 0 138 163 190
Percent Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0
Flow Rate (vPCE), pc/h 0 99 12 17 0 112 32 80 0 10 197 134 0 147 173 202
Right-Turn Bypass None None None None
Conflicting Lanes 1 1 1 1
Pedestrians Crossing, p/h 0 0 0 0
Proportion of CAVs, % 0
Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment
Approach EB WB NB SB
Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass
Critical Headway, s 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087
Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios
Approach EB WB NB SB
Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass
Entry Flow (ve), pc/h 128 224 341 522
Entry Volume, veh/h 128 224 333 522
Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h 432 306 258 154
Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h 293 244 376 302
Capacity (cpce), pc/h 888 1010 1061 1179
Capacity (c), veh/h 888 1010 1035 1179
v/c Ratio (x) 0.14 0.22 0.32 0.44
Delay and Level of Service
Approach EB WB NB SB
Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass
Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh 5.5 5.7 6.7 7.7
Lane LOS A A A A
95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh) 0.5 0.8 1.4 2.3
95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft) 12.5 20.0 35.7 57.5
Approach Delay, s/veh | LOS 5.5 A 5.7 A 6.7 A 7.7 A
Intersection Delay, s/veh | LOS 6.8 A 254
Queuing and Blocking Report
Intersection: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd
09/17/2025
Movement EB WB NB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR
Maximum Queue (ft) 40 49 77 68
Average Queue (ft) 19 18 39 34
95th Queue (ft) 49 55 87 82
Link Distance (ft) 261 705 168 444
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
2025 Future - Single Lane Roundabout SimTraffic Report
Page 1
255
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report- Chanhassen, MN Appendix E
Appendix E: Layouts of Roundabout Exhibits
EXHIBIT: 90-FOOT INSCRIBED CIRCLE DIAMETER (MINI ROUNDABOUT)
EXHIBIT: 120-FOOT INSCRIBED CIRCLE DIAMETER (STANDARD ROUNDABOUT)
256
LAKE DRIVE E REHABILITATION
0
SCALE IN FEET
20 40
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning
ISGInc.com
DWG LOCATION: H:\PROPOSALS\CHANHASSEN, MN\GREAT PLANES BLVD ROUNDABOUT.DWG SAVED BY: BARRETT.HUBBARD
90' ICD MINI ROUNDABOUT
N
Sheet Number X of X
90' ICD
LAKE DRIVE EGREAT PLAINS BOULEVARDISG PROJECT NO. 25-33064
CHANHASSEN, MN - 09/15/2025
257
0
SCALE IN FEET
20 40
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning
ISGInc.com
DWG LOCATION: H:\PROPOSALS\CHANHASSEN, MN\GREAT PLANES BLVD ROUNDABOUT-120ICD.DWG SAVED BY: BARRETT.HUBBARD
120' ICD ROUNDABOUT
N
Sheet Number X of X
ISG PROJECT NO. 25-33064
CHANHASSEN, MN - 09/15/2025
120' ICD
LAKE DRIVE EGREAT PLAINS BOULEVARDLAKE DRIVE E REHABILITATION
258
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report- Chanhassen, MN Appendix F
Appendix F: Intersection Sight Distance
F-1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SIGHT DISTANCE
Sight Triangles at Two-Way Stop Control Intersection- Lake Dr E
Sight Triangles at Two-Way Stop Control Intersection- Commercial Driveway
F-2 ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL SIGHT DISTANCE
Sight Triangle at All-Way Stop Control Intersection
259
0
SCALE IN FEET
69 139
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning
ISGInc.com
DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\33000 PROJ\33000-33099\33064 2026 LAKE DRIVE E REHAB PROJEC- CHANHASSEN MN\33064 PRODUCTION FILES\33064 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION\INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE_LAKE DR E STOP.DWG SAVED BY: HARITHA.GURRALA
GREAT PLAINS BLVD AND LAKE DR E
INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE
ISG PROJECT NO. 25-33064
CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA - --/--/--GREAT PLAINS BLVDLAKE DRIVE ECOMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY
CALCULATION NOTES:
·DECISION POINT OFFSET FROM EDGE OF THE MAJOR ROAD TRAVELED WAY = 14.5 FEET
·DESIGN SPEED OF MAJOR ROAD = 30 MPH
·CASE B1 - LEFT TURN FROM THE MINOR ROAD, TIME GAP, SINGLE UNIT TRUCK= 11 S
·CASE B2 - RIGHT FROM THE MINOR ROAD, TIME GAP, SINGLE UNIT TRUCK = 8.5 S
MINNE
S
O
T
A
T
R
U
N
K
HI
G
H
W
A
Y
5
DECISION POINT
N
375 FT SIGHT DISTANCE REQ'D
507 FT SIGHT DISTANCE REQ'D
V1
V3
V2
DECISION SIGHT DISTANCE IS CLEAR
(CASE B2)
DECISION SIGHT DISTANCE IS CLEAR
(CASE B1)
260
0
SCALE IN FEET
69 139
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning
ISGInc.com
DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\33000 PROJ\33000-33099\33064 2026 LAKE DRIVE E REHAB PROJEC- CHANHASSEN MN\33064 PRODUCTION FILES\33064 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION\INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE_DRIVEWAY STOP.DWG SAVED BY: HARITHA.GURRALA
GREAT PLAINS BLVD AND LAKE DR E
INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE
ISG PROJECT NO. 25-33064
CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA - --/--/--
TREES WITHIN SIGHT TRIANGLES
(CASE B1)
V1
V3
V2
GREAT PLAINS BLVDLAKE DRIVE ECOMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY
BUILDING WITHIN SIGHT TRIANGLE
(CASE B1)
375 FT SIGHT DISTANCE REQ'D
463 FT SIGHT DISTANCE REQ'D
CALCULATION NOTES:
·DECISION POINT OFFSET FROM EDGE OF THE MAJOR ROAD TRAVELED WAY = 14.5 FEET
·DESIGN SPEED OF MAJOR ROAD = 30 MPH
·CASE B1 - LEFT TURN FROM THE MINOR ROAD, TIME GAP, SINGLE UNIT TRUCK= 10.5 S
·CASE B2 - RIGHT FROM THE MINOR ROAD, TIME GAP, SINGLE UNIT TRUCK = 8.5 S
MINNE
S
O
T
A
T
R
U
N
K
HI
G
H
W
A
Y
5
DECISION POINT
N
261
SIG
H
T
L
I
N
E
SIG
H
T
L
I
N
E
SIGHT LINESIGHT LINESIGHT
L
INE
SIGHT LINE
0
SCALE IN FEET
70 139
Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning
ISGInc.com
DWG LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\33000 PROJ\33000-33099\33064 2026 LAKE DRIVE E REHAB PROJEC- CHANHASSEN MN\33064 PRODUCTION FILES\33064 CIVIL 3D\NON PRODUCTION DWGS\INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION\INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE_ALL-WAY STOP.DWG SAVED BY: HARITHA.GURRALA
GREAT PLAINS BLVD AND LAKE DR E
INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE
ISG PROJECT NO. 25-33064
CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA - --/--/--GREAT PLAINS BLVDLAKE DRIVE ECOMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY
NOTES:
·DECISION POINT OFFSET FROM EDGE OF THE MAJOR ROAD TRAVELED WAY = 14.5 FEET
MINNE
S
O
T
A
T
R
U
N
K
HI
G
H
W
A
Y
5
SIGHT LINES ARE CLEAR
N
V1
V2
V3
V4
262
Great Plains Blvd + Lake Dr E ICE Report- Chanhassen, MN Appendix G
Appendix G: Future Approach Lane Queue & LOS
263
HCM 6th AWSC
2045 Future - AWSC with Recommendations 4:39 pm 07/23/2025 Synchro 11 Report
Page 1
1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd 09/17/2025
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 15.3
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 93 11 16 105 30 75 9 183 120 138 163 190
Future Vol, veh/h 93 11 16 105 30 75 9 183 120 138 163 190
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 101 12 17 114 33 82 10 199 130 150 177 207
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 2 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay 12.2 13.8 15.9 16.4
HCM LOS B B C C
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2
Vol Left, % 3% 78% 50% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 59% 9% 14% 0% 46%
Vol Right, % 38% 13% 36% 0% 54%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 312 120 210 138 353
LT Vol 9 93 105 138 0
Through Vol 183 11 30 0 163
RT Vol 120 16 75 0 190
Lane Flow Rate 339 130 228 150 384
Geometry Grp 5 2 2 7 7
Degree of Util (X) 0.553 0.249 0.407 0.283 0.629
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.875 6.886 6.417 6.794 5.902
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 617 520 562 531 614
Service Time 3.886 4.939 4.46 4.506 3.613
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.549 0.25 0.406 0.282 0.625
HCM Control Delay 15.9 12.2 13.8 12.2 18.1
HCM Lane LOS C B B B C
HCM 95th-tile Q 3.4 1 2 1.2 4.4
264
Queuing and Blocking Report
2045 Future - AWSC with Recommendations SimTraffic Report
Page 1
09/17/2025
Intersection: 1: Commercial Access/Lake Drive E & Great Plains Blvd
Movement EB WB NB SB SB
Directions Served LTR LTR LTR L TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 43 60 73 58 78
Average Queue (ft) 33 47 60 39 61
95th Queue (ft) 46 69 88 59 84
Link Distance (ft) 278 708 189 467
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 160
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
265
Streets - Lake Drive East/Great Plains Improvements
Overview
Request Owner Charlie Howley, PW Director/City Engineer
Department Annual Pvmnt Mgmt Contracted
Form Type Capital Improvement
Request Type Street Construction/Reconstruction
Project Number ST-049
Description
Project includes the rehabilitation of Lake Drive East from Great Plains Blvd to where the 2018 project began.
Details
Type of Project Reconstruction
Location
266
Capital Cost Breakdown
Capital Cost FY2026 Total
Engineering $300,000 $300,000
Construction/Maintenance $1,100,000 $1,100,000
Total $1,400,000 $1,400,000
Capital Cost
FY2026 Budget
$1,400,000
Total Budget (all years)
$1.4M
Project Total
$1.4M
Capital Cost by Year
Construction/Maintenance Engineering
2026 $1,400,000.00
$0 $400K $800K $1.2M
Capital Cost for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $1,400,000.00
Construction/Maintenance (79%)$1,100,000.0
Engineering (21%)$300,000.00
267
Funding Sources Breakdown
Funding Sources FY2026 Total
Streets - PMP Assessments $552,000 $552,000
Utility Fund - Water $5,000 $5,000
Utility Fund - Sewer $5,000 $5,000
Utility Fund - SW Mgmt $10,000 $10,000
Streets - PMP MSA Funds $828,000 $828,000
Total $1,400,000 $1,400,000
Funding Sources
FY2026 Budget
$1,400,000
Total Budget (all years)
$1.4M
Project Total
$1.4M
Funding Sources by Year
Streets - PMP Assessments Streets - PMP MSA Funds
Utility Fund - Sewer Utility Fund - SW Mgmt
Utility Fund - Water
2026 $1,400,000.00
$0 $400K $800K $1.2M
Funding Sources for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $1,400,000.00
Streets - PMP Assessments (39%)$552,000.00
Streets - PMP MSA Funds (59%)$828,000.00
Utility Fund - Sewer (0%)$5,000.00
Utility Fund - SW Mgmt (1%)$10,000.00
Utility Fund - Water (0%)$5,000.00
268
########################################################################################################################################################################M
M
M
M
M
Lake
Virginia
Christmas
Lake
Lotus Lake
Brendan
Pond
Lake
Harrison
Kerber Pond
Lake Susan Rice
Marsh
Lake
Lake Riley
Rice Lake
Lake
St.
Joe
Lake
Minnewashta
Lake Ann
Lake Lucy
ST18
ST14
ST15
ST17
ST61
Minnewashta
Regional Park
North
Lotus
Lake Park
Meadow
Green
Park
Lake Ann Park
Chanhassen
Pond
Park
Chanhassen
Nature
Preserve
Chanhassen
Recreation
Center
Lake
Susan
Park
Rice Marsh
Lake Preserve
Power
Hill Park
Fox
Woods
Preserve
Bandimere
Community
Park
Bluff Creek
Golf Course
Hesse Farm
Park
Preserve
Lake
Susan
Preserve
City
Center
Park
Raguet Wildlife
Management
Are
MN Valley
National Wildlife Re
MN Landscape
Arboretum
Seminary Fen
Scientific
& Nat*
Bluff Creek
Preserve
Independent
School
District 11
Independent
School District
112
Independent School
District
276
Riley
Ridge
Park
Lake Ann Park
Preserve
SA7
SA101
SA5
SA5
SA41
)212 PowersBlvdLyman Blvd ChanhassenRdA r b o r e t u m Blvd
Pioneer Trl
A r boretum Blvd
GalpinBlvdH w y212Hwy 212Hazeltine BlvdMa
r
k
etBl
v
dPowers BlvdHwy 7AudubonRdF ly in g C lo u d D r Great
Plains
BlvdC
o
R
d
1
0
1
ST101
ST101
Date Created: 10/23/2024
Document Path: K:\Departments\Engineering\CIP\2025-2029\CIP_5Year_2025-2029.aprxCreated By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department µ0 3,000
Feet
0 0.5
Mile
5-Year CIP Pavement Management Plan (PMP) - Streets
(2025-2029)
City of Chanhassen
Legend
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
Mill & Overlay
Full Depth Reclamation
##Reconstruction
M Municipal State Aid
269
Page 1 of 5
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
ASSESSMENT POLICY
Date of Last City Council Adoption: May 5, 2025
The City of Chanhassen’s Assessment Policy is intended to provide general direction to City Staff and their
consultants in preparation of assessment rolls to establish fair and consistent treatment of all properties within the
City that are subject to an assessment. This document can also be used to educate and explain to property owners
about the Policy. All assessments shall follow the process outlined in Minnesota State Statutes, Chapter 429, which
gives the City the legal authority to assess benefiting property for public improvements.
The strict interpretation of this Policy may not apply in all circumstances, it is intended to be a guide for a systematic
process. The City Council may direct staff to use special consideration and discretion for the assessment
methodology on projects.
WHICH PROPERTIES ARE TO BE ASSESED
Determination about which properties are to be included in the assessment role generally fall into two (2) property
types:
1. Type 1: Land use that generates a low level of vehicular traffic, such as low-density residential properties.
o These properties shall be included in the assessment role for public street improvements that have
their primary driveway access, or that it can be reasonably determined will have a future driveway
access, to the street being rehabilitated. This includes property with a shared driveway or private
street access to the public street, except where said private street meets applicable criteria to allow
for a reduced or no assessment. The policy acknowledges that private streets are not maintained by
the City and therefore all costs associated with the maintenance of them are borne by the property
legally required to maintain them. Applicable criteria of private streets includes whether the street
meets City Code requirements with respect to width, pavement section, and appropriate fire
apparatus turn-around.
2. Other land use property types that generate increased levels of vehicular traffic, such as commercial, multi-
family, or schools.
o These properties shall be included in the assessment role for all adjacent public street improvement
projects, regardless of which street their primary driveway takes access from, or the number of
driveway access points; unless it can be reasonably determined that the use of the property does
not have any traffic impact on the adjacent public street receiving the improvements.
ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
There are various ways to calculate assessments. The typical methodology is based on the number of parcels, an
area, or linear foot calculation. Chanhassen has also developed a policy that utilizes a flat rate, meaning all parcels to
be assessed receive the same assessment regardless of any particular property characteristic.
• For property type 1 listed above, the properties to be assessed will receive an assessment amount equal to
the flat rate for which rehabilitation type the project is utilizing (mill and overlay, full depth reclamation, or
reconstruction). The flat rate is established on the City’s Fee Schedule, which is updated and approved by
the City Council annually. The flat rate utilized for a project will be the rate that is in effect on the date the
assessment role is adopted.
• For property type 2 listed above, the City shall use the calculation method that creates a reasonable
distribution of assessments across the entire roll.
270
Page 2 of 5
• Where reasonable to do so, when more than one “neighborhood” is contained within the same project,
the assessment roll may be calculated per each neighborhood, rather than the total project. This would not
apply to property type 1 as they would all receive a flat rate assessment.
• Unless otherwise exempt, public property, government land, private associations, schools, churches, and
non-profit property uses shall be included in the assessment roll.
• Commercial property, and Medium and High-Density Residential property shall be assessed based on a
reasonable determination of vehicular traffic generated.
• A duplex that is located on a single parcel, shall be considered two units. Generally, when traffic volumes
are used as the assessment methodology, a Residential Equivalent Unit (REU) or similar other unit
assessment relationship shall be used.
NEW CONSTRUCTION: 100% assessed to all benefitting properties.
New construction is typically paid for by the development itself and therefore not formally assessed. In some
instances, the City will undertake proactive installation of public utilities to unserved areas and then assess the
benefiting properties, or establish an improvement district/area with deferred access charges to cover the cost for
the added service. In other instances, properties may petition the City directly for the installation of the public
improvements in which case 100% of the costs are paid for by the benefiting properties.
Assessable Costs Include:
• Construction of a new public street, trail and/or sidewalk.
• Installation of public water main, storm sewer and/or sanitary sewer system, including appurtenances
(structures, valves, hydrants, lift stations, etc.), where it did not previously exist.
• Indirect costs (design, legal, and administration fees).
Notes:
• Oversizing of streets and utilities beyond the city’s standard details, or what is needed for the development
itself, are paid for by the city and are typically not assessed.
RECONSTRUCTION/REHABILITATION: 40% assessed to all benefitting properties, unless a flat rate methodology is
utilized.
When determining the rehabilitation method to be used, the following decision matrix shall be used for planning
purposes:
Question If Yes If No
Does the street need to change its intended use;
change to meet our current standard (width,
thickness, C&G, drainage, etc.); and/or has it met its
useful service life (~50 yrs)?
Plan for Reconstruction Move to next question
Is the pavement condition OCI between 0 and 29? Plan for Reconstruction Move to next question
Is the pavement condition OCI between 30 and 59? Plan for FDR Move to next question
Is the pavement condition OCI greater than 60? Plan for M&O n/a
Notes:
• Once a project is under design, an engineering analysis will be undertaken to determine the appropriate
rehabilitation method.
271
Page 3 of 5
• Two inches (2”) shall be the standard depth for a mill and overlay unless particular circumstances exist. Under
such circumstances, the flat rate will not be adjusted.
Assessable Costs Include:
• Pavement associated with public streets, trails and/or sidewalks. This includes draintile, geotechnical (soil
corrections, etc.), and other improvements needed to support the function of the pavement structure.
o In situations where there is no existing trail or sidewalk infrastructure, but such improvements are
being added by the project, the costs associated with the addition shall not be assessed unless
particular circumstances exist such as when the benefit of the new infrastructure is of primary
benefit to the assessable properties only.
• Curb and gutter, including curb impacted solely by utility improvements.
• Driveway pavement and aprons directly affected by the project work.
• Storm Sewer and appurtenances associated with street drainage.
• Multi-Modal improvements such as ADA ramps and actuated pedestrian crossings such as Rectangular Rapid-
Flashing Beacons (RRFB’s).
• Signing and striping.
• Retaining walls required within the Right-of-Way.
• Tree removal and/or landscaping improvements directly affected by the project work.
• Applicable percentage of indirect costs (design, legal, and admin fees).
Notes:
• If a residential property has access from a collector or otherwise oversized street, the assessment amount
shall be based on an equitable formula compared to a typical local roadway, including normalizing to a city
standard width, typical street pavement section, typical lot width, and other applicable factors. This
normalization does not apply to a flat rate assessment.
• Pavement projects on streets that provide direct access to Chanhassen property(s) that are being
implemented by an adjacent municipality shall not be assessed to the Chanhassen property(s) unless the
adjacent municipality is assessing the benefiting property in their jurisdiction as part of the project.
• Replacement, maintenance, or repair of existing public water main, sanitary sewer, and indirect stormwater
management infrastructure shall not be assessed. The City will pay 100% of these improvement costs out of
the associated enterprise fund.
REGULAR MAINTENANCE: Benefiting properties are not assessed.
• Activities Include: Pavement patching, pothole filling, crack sealing, chip sealing, sealcoating, sign
maintenance, lighting, and pavement markings.
PAYMENT OPTIONS
• Assessments can be paid in full up-front with no finance charge, otherwise the assessment will be certified to
the County and added to annual property taxes with interest.
• If elected to add to annual property taxes, the balance can be paid off at any time during the term if requested
by the property owner.
• Interest will be charged to property owners who choose to not pay their assessments in full by November 15th
in the year the special assessment is levied. The interest rate will be equal to the yield on the 7-year Treasury
Note on the date the special assessment roll is adopted, plus 1.0%.
272
Page 4 of 5
• Unless approved otherwise by the City Council, the maximum financing term for assessments shall be as
follows:
o $0-$500 1 year
o $501-$2,500 5 years
o $2,501-$5,000 8 years
o $5,001-$15,000 10 years
o $15,001 and above 15 years
HARDSHIP ASSESSMENT DEFERAL FOR SENIORS, DISABLED, OR MILITARY PERSONS
Minnesota Statute §435.193 allows a statutory city to establish standards and guidelines to defer special
assessments. A deferment of a special assessment for a homesteaded property may be granted if:
(1) The property is owned by a person 65 years of age or older or retired by virtue of a permanent and total
disability* for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments; or
(2) The property is owned by a person who is a member of the Minnesota National Guard or other military
reserves who is ordered into active military service, as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 190.05, subdivision
5b or 5c, as stated in the person’s military orders, for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments.
The deferment is not an elimination of the assessment, but rather a temporary pause of paying the assessment until
the hardship no longer exists. Interest on deferred assessments shall be subject to and charged at the interest rate
set by the City Council on its resolution adopting the special assessment, and such interest shall accrue on said
principal until the special assessment is paid in full.
The option of the property owner to defer the payment of special assessments shall terminate and all amounts
accumulated plus accrued interest (compounded annually) shall become due and payable within sixty (60) days upon
the occurrence of any of the following events:
(1) The sale, transfer, or subdivision of the property or any part thereof, or the property is in any way conveyed
to another person; or
(2) The subject property loses its homestead status for any reason; or
(3) The death of the owner qualified for deferral status unless a surviving spouse is eligible for benefits
hereunder; or
(4) If for any reason the City Council determines that there would be no hardship in requiring an immediate or
partial payment of the deferred special assessment.
To request deferral of a special assessment, the property owner must request a deferment on the form prescribed by
the City Clerk within thirty (30) days after the adoption of the improvement assessment by the City Council.
The applicant must submit a copy of the federal income tax return from the year prior to the assessment to verify
that all sources of income do not exceed the very low-income limits for the Carver County area as established by the
Department of Housing and Urban Development.
The property must be the applicant’s principal residence and classified on the real estate tax rolls as the applicant’s
homestead.
City staff will review the application and if the applicant meets the standards and guidelines above, the deferment
will be granted.
The City Council has the discretion to make the determination that a hardship exists based on exceptional and
unusual circumstances not covered by the standards and guidelines where the determination is made in a
273
Page 5 of 5
nondiscriminatory manner and does not give the applicant an unreasonable preference or advantage over other
applicants.
*Permanent and total disability shall have the same definition for purposes of assessment deferral as is used for social security.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
A Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document addressing the most common questions concerning assessments is
attached to this policy and can also be found on the City’s website.
274
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item Lake Minnewashta Slow No Wake Public Hearing
File No.N/A Item No: G.2
Agenda Section PUBLIC HEARINGS
Prepared By Joe Seidl, Water Resources Engineer
Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen
SUGGESTED ACTION
The Chanhassen City Council should hold a public hearing to consider modifying the Slow-No-
Wake Elevation of Lake Minnewashta and associated City Ordinance modification language to be
submitted to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for review.
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Operational Excellence
SUMMARY
A Citizen Action Request was received by the City on July 14, 2025 requesting a change to the existing
Slow-No Wake Elevation (SNW) for Lake Minnewashta. The request is to raise the SNW elevation
from the current elevation of 945.0 to the FEMA 100-yr flood elevation of 945.9.
The topic was discussed at the City Council work session held on October 13, 2025. The direction from
council at that work session was to evaluate raising the SNW elevation to 945.3, and to reduce the
waiting time of lifting the no wake restriction down from 3 days to 1 day. Staff has prepared a report
giving an overview of the request.
A draft ordinance modifying City Code is also attached.
A change to the City Code regulating the SNW elevation will need to be submitted to the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources (DNR) for review and approval. If the City Council chooses to move
275
forward with a request to change the code, staff will forward the necessary documents to the DNR for
review. If approved by the DNR, the City Council would consider adopting the ordinance at a future city
council meeting, ahead of next summer's boating season.
BACKGROUND
See Report
DISCUSSION
See Report
BUDGET
N/A
RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS
City Code Language
Lake Minnewashta Overview
Overview: Slow No Wake Minnewashta Ordinance Update
Water Level Data Lake Minnewashta
County slow-no wake data
Slow No-Wake Restrictions 10.23 LakeOwners Survey
276
277
278
Chaska RoadPrairi
e Flo
w
e
r BlvdRed Cedar Point Rd
Les le e Curve5Gunflint TrailVassermanPlace
2MillCreekLNWashta
Bay Ct
Highway 41Highover LaneChes Mar DrLandingsCrtHighoverCrtS
Linden C ir
P a i s le y P a th
1Moccasin Trail
C e n t u r y Trail
Tristan Dr
Water Tower Place
77t
h St
D artm o u t h D r
L a k e H
a
r
r
ison Rd
7Dogwood Ave3 Coach Place
W hite
Oak Lane
Wy
n
s
o
n
g
La
n
eMelodyLaneMaple DrC i r c l e
W 78th
S
t
S traw b e r r y L a ne
Dogwood Rd4 Autumn Ridge Ct
5 Autumn Ridge Ln
6 Autumn Ridge WayCartwayLane 1 Harvest Lane!Rock Island Ln TanagersPointL a ke Lucy R
oad
South
C
e
d
ar
Driv
e
Stratford RidgeGalpin BlvdTulipCtW 78th Stre e t
P
ip
e
w
o
o
d
C
rt
HarrisonHillTrailMinnewashtaParkwayStone CreekCrt
H ig h c re s tC irPi
n
e
wo
o
dCir
c
l
eHa
n
c
o
c
k
P
l
a
c
e Tanagers Ln4 Coach Dr
F awnHi l l
Cou r t
!Village Cir ForrestCirW 65th St
ForestRidgeCircleFawnHillR d
Highover
Crt N
3
Corporate
Place
W 82nd St
Oakwood
Ridge
M a p le w o o d
C ir6 Village Place
Pinehur s t D rCentury BlvdFir TreeManchesterDriveMeado w
Lane
6 4th StState H w y 7
Galpin BlvdLakeri
d
g
e RoadTanadoona Drive
StoneCreekRdGalpi
n CrtElm TreeS t o n e Cr
eek Lane EBentz CtRed O a k
L a n e
L
ongacres D rJoshuaCir Hunt e r Dr
HarrisonHillCourt
Rogers
Ct
BridleCreek
Circle
3Tri
s
t
an KnollLone Cedar Lan
e
A
mb
erw
ood Ln
Ironwood
6
Pa
d
d
o
c
k
Ln
BentBowTrailGreenbriar AveHighover
Way
6HazeltineBlvd(Hwy41)Arrowhead Ln
3
State
H
w
y
5
Kings Road
!Village Ln
Bar
b
erryCirCentury BoulevardC o u lt e r B lv d
Glendale Dr
W 62nd St
S a n d piperTrailMaje s t ic Way
Glend a l e D r
W 78th Street
Melody Hill
Circle
3 Autumn Ridge Avenue
A co rn
LaneCrestview Dr
!Village Crt
L
a
ke Lucy R o a d
Leslee
C
u
r
v
e
2 Coach Lane
Hallgren Lane
Bent Bow Trai
l
Fore
st
AveB
rinker StFawn Hill RdR e n a i s s a n c e
C o u r t
K ir kw
o
od Ci
r
78th
S
t
W
Sommer
Gate
!Century Circle
Century Ct.
Century Place
North M
a
n
or
Lukewood Dr
Highwood
Dr Melo
d
y Hill
Highover DriveHills
d
al
eC
rt
Red C
e
d
a
r
Cove
Ches
M
a
r
F
a
r
m
R
d
Crestview Dr
(CSAH 15)Ridgehill RoadWestwood DrArboretumVill
ageCircleStone Cree k D rCypressDrivePip
e
w
o
o
d
Cir
A rb o retum
D riveB o u ld e r R oad12
Ridgevie
w
WayStratfordLn
2
Maple Shores
Dr
Hawthorne
Va
s
ser
man Trail
Century BlvdCrimson Bay RdLand in g s D riveA r b o r e t u m B oulevard
Al
d
e
r
W
a
y
1
S h o r e Drive
Coulter BlvdLake Harriso
n Circle
W 82nd St1 Coach Court
M
in
n
e
w
a
s
hta
C
o
urt
W
7
8th StreetArborLane
Lym an Blvd (CSAH
1
8
)
Gunflint
Tr
ail
T i m berwood Dr
Wash
t
a
Bay R o ad4 Windsor CtW a l nut Cu r v e
W hite Oak
Lane
Maple Cir
CountryO aks
RdRe d F o x
LodgepolePoint4Pipewood LaneNorthwoodCourtHickory
R
o
a
d
!Arboretum Village
Ln, Pl, Crt, & Crv
Piper Rid
g
e
L
n
5 Brenden CourtOrioleAvePipewood CurveChurch RoadCountryOaksRoadGunflintCourt
Ridgeview
Point F
a
wn Hill
Rd CrocusCt1StratfordBlvd
82nd Street
BenwoodCircle7 Arboretum Village Trl
Beacon
CourtMeadowCourt H igh o v e r T railCountry Oaks
Dr
S t one C r e e k
Lane W
Lon g a c re s D rMi
n
n
ewashtaWo
odsDrMurray Hill RoadS o u t h e r n
C r t
2
Bridle Creek Tra ilO r chard La n e
M a p le w o o d
T e rra ceJuniper Ave.Murray
Hill Crt
2 Harvest Way
5 Village Street Che
st
n
u
tLaneLake Virginia
Brendan Pond
Lake Harrison
Lake St. Joe
Lake
Minnewashta
Minnewashta
Regional Park
Chanhassen
Nature
Preserve
Chanhassen
Recreation
Center
MN Landscape
Arboretum
Bluff Creek
Preserve
Independent
School
District 11
Independent
School
District 276
Lake Ann Park
Preserve
µ0 1,200
Feet
0 0.1 0.2
Mile
Lake Minnewashta Overview Map
City of Chanhassen
Date: 10/9/2025
Path: K:\Departments\Engineering\Lake Minnewashta Watershed\Lake Minnewashta Watershed.aprx - 10/9/2025* Approximate Location Based on LIDAR Data
Legend
Storm Manholes
Storm Inlets
Storm Discharge Points
945' (Slow - No Wake Elevation)*
945.9' (100 Year Floodplain Contour)*
Storm Culverts
Storm Gravity Mains
Storm Detention Areas
Lake Minnewashta Lakeshed
Outlet Channel
Public Boat Launch
279
Slow-No-Wake Restriction on Lake Minnewashta
I. Introduction
This report reviews the history, purpose, and current conditions of Lake Minnewashta’s
slow-no wake (SNW) elevation and provides considerations for potential adjustments.
Slow-no wake regulations temporarily restrict watercraft speeds when water levels are
elevated, requiring boats to operate at the slowest speed necessary (approximately 5 MPH)
to maintain steerage and minimize wake. The primary objectives are to protect public
safety, reduce shoreline erosion, safeguard docks and private property, and preserve water
quality.
Lake Minnewashta’s SNW elevation is currently set at 945.0 feet which is 0.5 feet higher
than the Ordinary High-Water Level (OHWL) of 944.5 determined by the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The SNW elevation was set in 2019 and is based
on a 10-year water level analysis, shoreline and erosion review, and public engagement.
This benchmark reflects relatively uncommon high-water marks from prolonged wet
weather and/or large storm events, and provides a standard that attempts to balance
recreation, property protection, and environmental stewardship.
During the past two years (2024 and 2025) rainfall events caused the SNW restriction to be
placed on area lakes during the 4th of July Holiday. As a result of the untimely nature, City
Council and Staf received feedback from residents concerned with the SNW ordinance
and triggering elevation. A Citizen Action Request with a proposal to raise the SNW
elevation on Lake Minnewashta to the FEMA 100-year Floodplain elevation of 945.9 was
submitted on July 14, 2025.
II. Lake Minnewashta Overview
Lake Minnewashta spans approximately 700 acres with an average depth of 15 feet and a
maximum depth near 70 feet. Its shoreline stretches roughly 8.9 miles. The lake supports
aquatic plants, fish habitat, and recreational activities. Water quality is generally good,
though invasive species such as Eurasian watermilfoil and zebra mussels are present.
Localized shoreline erosion has been observed. Shoreline erosion and watershed nutrient
loading occasionally afect water clarity. An overview map of the Lake Minnewashta area is
included in the appendix for reference.
280
The shoreline features a mix of developed residential areas and natural sections. Lawns,
docks, and riprap dominate private property, while public parkland and undeveloped areas
retain native vegetation bufers.
Recreational use is diverse, centered on Lake Minnewashta Regional Park, which ofers
swimming, boating, fishing, trails, and seasonal activities including ice fishing and winter
trail use. Boating is popular both from adjacent property owners, but also visitors using the
public boat launch. Pleasure boating and other high-wake activities have increased in
popularity recently, highlighting the need to balance recreational demand with
environmental protection.
Lake Minnewashta tends to have longer SNW enforcement periods despite a higher
elevation threshold compared to Lotus Lake, which uses the OHWL as a benchmark. This
is due to the watershed characteristics. Lake Minnewashta has a larger watershed with
less impervious surface and more upland storage compared to Lotus Lake which results in
a slower draining system.
III. Historical Review
The first slow-no wake ordinance in Chanhassen was adopted on July 11, 1983 (Ordinance
No. 73), establishing speed restrictions on marked slow-no wake areas. Subsequent
amendments addressed evolving community needs, environmental concerns, and
regulatory standards.
• 2003, Ordinance No. 356: Updated provisions and state law integration.
• 2006, Ordinances No. 418 & 419: Refinements for specific lakes including Lotus
Lake and Lake Susan.
• 2019, Ordinance No. 642: Trigger thresholds updated on Chanhassen Lakes,
including Lake Minnewashta set to 945.0
• 2020, Ordinance No. 655: Further alignment with hydrologic benchmarks and DNR
approvals.
281
Current slow-no wake elevations for nearby lakes:
Lake SNW Elevation
Lotus Lake 896.30’
Lake Lucy 957.24’
Lake Minnewashta 945.00’
Lake Susan 882.50’
Changes to SNW thresholds can be made anytime via a formal process, including public
hearings, ordinance publishing, and a 120-day review by the Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources (DNR).
IV. Slow-No Wake Elevation Determination
Slow–No Wake elevations are established to protect shorelines, property, and water quality
during periods of high water by temporarily restricting boat speeds to minimize wave
action. The elevation is determined through analysis of site-specific conditions for each
lake or water body, including shoreline characteristics, adjacent land use, vegetation,
water level history, and the relationship to nearby infrastructure. Because every lake
responds diferently to high-water events, SNW elevations are evaluated individually rather
than using a uniform standard across all water bodies.
Public input plays a key role in this process. Before a SNW restriction can be adopted or
modified, DNR rules require that a public hearing be held to gather feedback from afected
property owners, recreational users, and other stakeholders. This input helps local
governments and the DNR better understand community perspectives, lake use patterns,
and potential impacts before finalizing an ordinance or rule change.
Typically, the established SNW elevation falls above the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL)
- the typical upper limit of natural lake levels - but below the FEMA 1% annual chance flood
elevation (commonly referred to as the 100-year floodplain). Setting the restriction within
this range ensures that boating limitations are triggered before flooding occurs, providing a
balance between recreational access and the protection of shorelines, habitat, and
adjacent properties.
The 100-year floodplain elevation is established through detailed hydrologic and hydraulic
modeling using synthetic storm events based on historical precipitation data. In
282
Chanhassen, a 100-year storm equates to approximately 7.5 inches of rainfall within 24
hours. These events are rare and often result in emergency conditions, including property
damage and street flooding. In contrast, SNW elevations are typically set closer to the
OHWL - the point along a waterbody where riparian vegetation transitions from aquatic to
terrestrial species. Aquatic plants near the OHWL are naturally adapted to withstand
periodic submersion and wave action, helping maintain shoreline stability.
SNW elevations from nearby lakes were reviewed for comparison. Within nearby Counties,
22 lakes were identified with published SNW, OHWL, and 100-year FEMA Floodplain
elevations. The vast majority of these lakes (19 out of 22) have SNW elevations set below
the FEMA Floodplain elevation. Most (11 of 22) have SNW elevations established between
the OHWL and the 100-year floodplain, while the remaining 8 have SNW elevations at or
below the OHWL. Detailed SNW elevation data for area lakes is provided in the appendix.
The intent of a SNW restriction is not to prevent flooding, but to reduce wave-related
erosion and property damage during temporary periods of elevated water levels while
maintaining a fair balance between environmental protection and lake recreation.
V. Data Collection and Trends
Water levels are continuously monitored by the City and the watershed district using real-
time sensors. When data suggests that SNW thresholds may be exceeded, City staf
confirm the readings through manual measurements taken from established benchmarks.
It is important to note that water level data carries an estimated margin of error of
approximately 0.05 feet. This variation can result from instrument or GPS calibration errors,
as well as physical and human factors such as wave action and measurement technique.
According to the ordinance, the SNW restriction is enacted when the water level exceeds
elevation 945.0 feet. In practice, City staf must observe a level of at least 945.05 feet
(rounded to 945.1) to confirm this threshold. This margin of error and the use of significant
digits were considered in the water level analysis presented in this report.
Water level data and SNW restriction frequency of Lake Minnewashta was compared to
Lotus Lake, which is the most similar Lake in Chanhassen with respect to recreational use.
Graphical depictions of the data are included in the appendix.
Analysis of the past 10 years shows:
283
Lake SNW
Enforcement
Water Level Exceeded
Threshold
% of Boating Season
Restricted
Lake
Minnewashta
2 times (since
2019) 5 times 10%
Lotus Lake 3 times (since
2019)
Analysis of the past 20 years shows:
6 times 5%
Lake SNW
Enforcement
Water Level Exceeded
Threshold
% of Boating Season
Restricted
Lake
Minnewashta
2 times (since
2019) 11 times 12%
Lotus Lake 3 times (since
2019) 12 times 4%
An analysis of Lake Minnewashta’s SNW elevations over the past 20 years was conducted
to estimate how often the restriction would be triggered and what percentage of the
boating season it would remain in efect. This analysis assumes that the waiting period to
lift the restriction is reduced from three days to 24 hours. As shown in the table below, even
small adjustments in the SNW elevation can result in substantial diferences in the
frequency and duration of restrictions.
Proposed SNW Elevation
(ft)
Number of SNW
Events
Number of SNW
Days
% of Boating
Season
945.0 11 322 10%
945.1 10 154 5%
945.2 5 87 3%
945.3 1 61 2%
945.9 1 5 <1%
284
VI. Impacts of Raising the SNW Elevation
Raising the SNW elevation could have ecological consequences. These impacts reflect what
could happen under certain conditions, but a modest and well-managed rise in lake level would
not automatically cause them.
1. Shoreline Erosion Risks
o Higher water levels can destabilize shorelines and riparian habitats.
o Vegetation critical for sediment stabilization may be submerged, increasing
erosion and sedimentation.
2. Habitat and Water Quality Efects
o Riparian vegetation subjected to wave action may die, disrupting wildlife
habitats along the lake shore.
o Loss of riparian vegetation decreases natural filtration, potentially degrading
water quality.
3. Sediment and Phosphorus Loading
o Disturbance of shoreline sediments can release phosphorus, fueling algal
blooms and eutrophication.
o Water clarity may decrease, and nutrient cycling may shift, afecting overall
lake ecology.
Property Owner Impacts
Timely SNW enforcement protects docks, riprap, and shorelines, preventing erosion and
sediment/nutrient runof that can degrade water quality. Delayed activation or higher
thresholds increase the risk of property damage and potential repairs. Conservative SNW
thresholds help preserve both environmental and community assets.
While raising the SNW elevation would extend recreational opportunities, it can introduce
more long-term risks to shoreline stability and aquatic ecosystem health. Alternative
measures like shoreline restoration, riparian bufers, and stormwater management may
mitigate impacts while maintaining recreational flexibility.
VII. Recreational Impacts
SNW restrictions afect boating activities like wakeboarding, tubing, and water skiing.
Targeted restrictions preserve partial recreational use while minimizing erosion and
285
property damage. Adaptive management approaches—seasonal or temporary
adjustments—can balance recreational access with environmental protection.
VIII. Resident Outreach
City staf conducted an outreach campaign to gather input on the existing SNW elevation
for Lake Minnewashta. Engagement eforts included hosting a public open house on
October 9th, 2025, to share background information and collect feedback, as well as
distributing an online survey targeted to lakeshore property owners to better understand
resident perspectives and experiences. To ensure broad community awareness, staf
implemented a communications campaign through the City’s website, social media
platforms, and mailed notices to afected residents. The information collected through
these eforts will help inform City Council’s consideration of whether adjustments to the
current SNW elevation are warranted.
Analysis of the feedback revealed difering opinions among residents. Some supported
raising the triggering elevation or removing the SNW restriction entirely, while others felt the
current elevation is appropriate or even too high. Of the 102 surveys and letters received,
70 respondents (69%) favored raising the SNW elevation, while 32 respondents (31%)
preferred keeping it the same or lowering it. Among Lake Minnewashta lakeshore property
owners specifically, 52 respondents (75%) supported raising the elevation, compared to 17
respondents (25%) who did not.
Residents who supported a higher SNW elevation expressed that the current level is too
conservative and unnecessarily restricts lake use during Minnesota’s short boating season.
They also noted that shoreline impacts from boating activity are minimal compared to
natural occurrences such as ice heaves.
Conversely, residents who favored maintaining the current elevation emphasized the
importance of balancing recreation with environmental protection. Some, particularly
those in low-lying areas, reported experiencing shoreline erosion and property damage
from wave action during periods of high water.
Respondents from the City’s survey expressed broad support for reducing the duration the
lake must remain below the SNW elevation before the restriction can be lifted.
IX. Regulatory and Legal Framework
Minnesota’s SNW ordinance process ensures transparency and compliance:
286
1. Prepare a Water Surface Use Management (WSUM) worksheet and map.
2. Draft a necessity statement explaining reasons for changes.
3. Draft ordinance language specifying boundaries, triggers, enforcement, and
penalties.
4. Conduct a public hearing for community input.
5. Submit materials to the DNR for a 120-day review.
Approval from the DNR is required before formal adoption. This structured process
balances local interests, statewide standards, and environmental protection.
X. Options for Council Consideration
• Maintain current SNW elevation: Status quo; frequency and duration of
restrictions expected to remain similar to what was observed in the past
• Lower the elevation: More frequent restrictions, stronger shoreline protection.
• Raise the elevation: Fewer restrictions, greater recreational access, increased
environmental risk.
• Adaptive management:
o Reduce the number of consecutive days a lake is lower than the threshold
from 3 days to 1 day.
o Temporary or seasonal adjustments with periodic review.
o Targeted permanent SNW areas in critical areas
XI. City Council Work Session
The Chanhassen City Council discussed the SNW topic during its work session on October
13, 2025. At that meeting, staf presented information from the draft report and reviewed
preliminary survey results. Following the discussion, the City Council expressed that the
current SNW elevation for Lake Minnewashta may be overly restrictive and directed staf to
prepare a draft ordinance amendment to raise the SNW elevation to 945.3 feet and reduce
the waiting period to lift the restriction from 3-days to 24 hours.
287
XII. Discussion
The analysis of Lake Minnewashta demonstrates that there is a relatively narrow range of
elevations at which a SNW restriction is appropriate. The current (945.0) and proposed
(945.3) SNW elevations are near the lower and upper limits of this range respectively,
reflecting the need to balance shoreline and property protection with recreational access.
There is no exact formula for determining SNW elevations; instead, they are established
through site-specific evaluation of factors and public input. Each lake responds diferently
to high-water events, requiring an individual assessment rather than a uniform standard.
Precision in defining the SNW elevation is critical. Establishing the restriction to the tenth
(945.X) decimal place helps account for measurement error, variations in water level
readings, and natural fluctuations, ensuring that the restriction is triggered appropriately
without being overly conservative or lenient.
A proposed elevation of 945.3 feet would rarely be reached (only observed 1 time during
the last 20 years) during the historic flooding observed in 2014, making the restriction
infrequent and inconsistent with observed patterns on comparable lakes such as Lotus
Lake. In contrast, maintaining the current SNW elevation of 945.0 would preserve the
status quo which resulted in approximately 12 % of the boating season being restricted
when analyzing the last 10 years of data. A small increase to 945.1 feet would reduce the
number of restriction days by approximately half which demonstrates how minor
adjustments can have a significant efect on restriction duration. Observed damage on
Lake Minnewashta during periods of high water underscores the importance of maintaining
SNW restrictions at an elevation that protects the shoreline without unnecessarily limiting
recreational boating.
XIII. Appendices
• Historical lake level data
• Lake Minnewashta Overview Map
• Comparison of SNW thresholds on nearby lakes
• Sample ordinance language
288
289
Lake SNW OHWL FEMA SNW-OHW FEMA-SNW
Crooked 861.6 862.1 863.4 -0.5 1.8
Waconia 963.1 963.1 963.54 0 0.44
Lotus 896.3 896.3 897.84 0 1.54
Susan 882.5 881.8 885 0.7 2.5
Minnewashta 945 944.5 945.9 0.5 0.9
Lucy 957.24 956.1 957.24 1.14 0
Byllesby 858.2 856.6 860 1.6 1.8
Crystal 934 934.5 934.8 -0.5 0.8
Marion 983.6 983.1 985 0.5 1.4
Bryant Lake 852.6 851.38 853 1.22 0.4
Sarah 981.1 979.9 981 1.2 -0.1
Independence 958.2 957.5 960 0.7 1.8
Medicine 889.4 889.1 890 0.3 0.6
Upper Prior 903.9 903.9 907 0 3.1
Lower Prior 903.9 903.9 907 0 3.1
Spring 912.8 912.8 914 0 1.2
Gervais 860 859.64 863 0.36 3
Long 866.22 864.93 869 1.29 2.78
Island 947 946.76 946 0.24 -1
Minnetonka 929.8 929.41 931.1 0.39 1.3
Cross 935 933.74 940 1.26 5
Elk 962.2 962.2 969 0 6.8
290
Submission DateLives on Lake MinnewashtaHow do you use the lake (boating, fishing, kayaking, waterskiing, wake-boating, etc.)?How would you describe the water quality of Lake Minnewashta?What do you think about the current slow-no-wake elevation, do you feel it is at the right level? What are your thoughts about slow-no-wake restrictions in general? Any other comments?10/13/2025 13:33 yes boating, fishing, kayaking, swimming, viewDeclining this year due to runoff from spring and early summer rains. Minnewashta is a C+ lake as rated by the DNR and it should be higher. Future generations are at risk No wake level doesn't matter without out reasonable boating regulations. No wake level doesn't matter without out reasonable boating regulations. City engineering and Council must engage with LMPA, the true stewards of the lake. The lake is as healthy as it is thanks to LMPA.10/13/2025 4:55I have lived across from the lake for 29 years has always been considered, and continues to be one of the cleanest Lake Waters in the entire greater metro area. I mean, it still In general, I think no wake restrictions would help preserve Shoreline and shallow lake beds.what’s frustrating is that white boat owners think that they have a right to do what they want.10/15/2025 7:07 Fishing, paddle boarding, canoeing, beach use, swimming Average No. Feels it’s too high and is causing shoreline damage.In favor, it needs to be balanced. But not allowing one use of the lake to usurp other activities or the ecosystem as a whole.10/14/2025 18:21 yesPontoon boat, ski boat (not wake surf boat), kayak, paddle board, swimming/floating. We live on the lake.Good, but we have more weed clean-up than we used to. I suspect the large increase in wake surf boats means more, deeper props chopping more vegetation and stirring It should not be set higher. I disagree with comments that it should be changed because it's "arbitrary." There's a logical narrow range. Setting it at flood zone level would be absurd.Sometimes necessary. It appears that no one likes being restricted from anything, ever, but data-based analyses and common sense must prevail for lake quality and the preservation of lakeshore.It's important to maintain no wake restrictions. The currently established level is appropriate. Reducing the 3 days to 1 day is probably misguided due to risk of on-off-on-off, etc. Maybe 2 days.10/14/2025 14:11 yesWe have a pontoon and a small ski boat. We ski, occasionally tow a tube, cruise in the pontoon. We also kayak on either a sit atop or our Hobie pedal kayak, and paddle board.Great water quality for an urban lake, although it seems to be weedier that it used to be. There's so much more wake surfing now, its a lot more work to maintain the beach because of chopped up weedsWhen no-wake was declared both in 2024 and 2025, our level lot was already slightly flooded and wakes lapped up over the riprap and onto our yard. If it's raised, we'll be under water. They're not fun, but are necessary to protect both shorelines and water quality. We respect the science/engineering and don't want to trade short term fun for long-term lake health & property values.10/13/2025 19:24 yes Boating, kayaking, swimming Very good Yes very Important Enforcement of no-wake in recent years has been lacking10/13/2025 14:00 Boating, fishingThe water quality is really good. Clear water and the fish species seem to be healthy.Yes I feel like it is at the right level and do not recommend any changes. If I were in charge I would limit wake surfing to certain hours and areas of the lake.My perception is that people who want the restriction less strict are reacting to the last couple of rainy summers where the elevation for no wake is met. Feels like recency bias.10/12/2025 13:23 yes Boating, fishing, paddle boarding, swimming, water skiing, Good Yes Helps protect shoreline erosion & protect homeowners property 10/11/2025 15:43 yes SailingQuite turbid. I have lived on the lake since 1997 and this year was one of the worst for water qualityI am no fan of Wake boats. They are completely inharmonious with nature. I would make the level more restrictive than it currently is. Not all boaters follow rules and it only takes a They are imperative. If people want to surf, go to the ocean. These boats are incredibly destructive: They erode shoreline, stir the bottom, guzzle gas and transfer invasive species in their ballast tanks.10/11/2025 9:22 yesMy wife and I are both water sports enthusiasts and use the lake very frequently for pontooning, skiing, tubing, swimming, kayaking and just cooling off. For a metro area lake, it is above average but this year, water clarity has degraded from years past perhaps due to high water levels and an increase in the number of surf boats. Both are damagingI believe it is at the right level. At 945.0', the water is above the OHWL and affecting my shore vegetation. Wave action from boats undercuts and erodes my shore. I have lost feet over the yearsI wish we didn't need them but they are necessary to protect the water quality and property of land owners. Going to a one day waiting period will reduce the recreational impact. We have spent thousands of dollars planting a shoreline buffer. If we raise the trigger, we will need to spend thousands more to further harden our shoreline. The wave damage is real.10/8/2025 22:11 yes Pontoon, waterski, swim Good No Not strict enough and not enforced.10/7/2025 19:06 Fishing, boating Poor compared to when I moved to the address shown in Yes It is useful for controlling shoreline erosion thus lake water 10/7/2025 13:50 We use our association beach lot in Minnewashta Heights Fair Yes, slow-no-wake protects the shorelines and the lake water They are good as long as based on sound science10/6/2025 9:27 Kayaking, paddle boarding Clear but sadly because of zebra musclesI definitely appreciate the no wake restrictions as the wake surf boats create immense waves that affect the shoreline even when the boat itself is hundreds of feet away. Slow and no wake restrictions are probably unfair but I think it’s absolutely necessary to restrict wake surfing. This sport is doing so much damage to the lake . Wake surfing is so damaging to the lake and so disruptive to those who like kayaking, paddle boarding that I find it unbelievable that we don’t put the restrictions on them! 10/5/2025 8:39 yes Boating, fishing, kayaking, wakeboarding About rightIt is a good ordinance and protects shorelines and damage to boats tied to docksRules are only good if enforced which does not happen. The is no enforcement on Lake Minnewashta. There should be an ordinance for 10/4/2025 15:14 Mostly fishing, kayaking Acceptable for fishing, kayaking The elevation is good for most uses, but not protective of the lake for wake boats.Think they're an important tool to help protect the shorelines. While they can be inconvenient, it's much worse when all the natural 10/4/2025 15:01 Kayaking and pontooning Weedy I think the current level is fine and should stay the sameI think it’s important to protect lake property from erosion and there should be more patrols when a slow no wake is required.I think there should be more restrictions on how many of the large wake producing boats that are allowed on the lake and more distance from 10/4/2025 14:51 yes Boating, lakeshore beach Excellent Yes, current elevation feels appropriate Good to have to protect shoreline. No wake near shore makes sense. Ability to have a few very specific event exceptions (ie annual waterski 10/3/2025 10:11 yes boating, kayaking, waterskiing, tubing, swimmingThe water is very clear unquiet days. The water is very dirty on days of south winds and/or heavy boat usage, especially on weekends and holidays. for example the Yes, they are at the right level. Please do not change the slow-no-wake restrictions.The current slow-no-wake restrictions only impact wake surf boats for about two weeks. But during the higher water levels the shore line is impacted the most with the waves they produce. 10/1/2025 20:52 yesWe have lakefront property with a beach. We kayak, canoe, swim, and use our pontoon boat on the lake. It is okay but has had a lot more weeds the past few years and does not seem as clear as it was just 5 years ago. I think it is currently at the right level. I think they are important and necessary to preserve shorelines and maintain a healthy habitat for wildlife. I would support an allowance I think it is vital to protect our shorelines from erosion. Distance from shore by wake boats is crucial to help protect shorelines. Preserving 10/1/2025 20:03 Boating, swimming, fishing Average It feels correct. If any change is needed, the lake level elevation could be lowered (not raised) to better protect lake health and reduce shoreline erosion Great! Protects shoreline, aquatic life, and water quality &is safer for non-motorized use. A recent study by the U of M shows large waves hurt overall lake health (long lasting impacts)It seems irresponsible to loosen the requirements for slow no-wake. The level is set to protect the lake. Lake & boats still fun now, just big waves at responsible water levels. Increase enforcement10/1/2025 19:33 fishing, swimming good good I think there appropriate10/1/2025 18:31 Kayak, fishing g, paddleboard Average, could be a lot better. To much run off from yards full of chemicals. And road run off. Needs more natural I dont think it should be any lower. The no wake level is important. I have seen a lot of shoreline erosion over the years They are good and need to be enforced.10/1/2025 17:40 yesI own a home on the lake, we actively use the lake for boating (pontoon), canoeing, kayaking, paddle boarding, and Usually very good. Seemed like it was not quite as clean this year as it's been in the past. Going down hill the last I feel it is the right level. I feel they are very important to enforce. There's been a great deal of debate regarding wake boats. There's no question that these types I'm not against wake boats, everyone deserves to enjoy the lake. But with this type of boat becoming more common, I feel it's even more 10/1/2025 17:20 yes Boating, kayaking B minus At right level I support them for protection of water quality and lakeshore 10/1/2025 17:09 Paddle boarding and swimming Clear and interesting mix of emergent vegetation About right Support them. The lake is much calmer when in place and more 10/1/2025 15:48 paddling/fishing acceptableNo. As a resident whose main lake recreation is paddling, I find these smaller community lakes that allow wake boats are too dangerous and exclude my use.As Chanhassen and the surrounding area grows in population, small lakes should stay inclusive to all. Without slow-no-wake rules, wake boats monopolize them and exclude paddlers and anglers.Do Lotus Lake next! I have association dock access for this lake and it is CONSTANTLY disruptive to paddlers with just a few wake boats - can't get away from them & don't feel safe10/1/2025 15:30 fishing generally acceptable generally acceptableI am in favor of restrictions to ensure the health of our lakes and shorelines. More restrictive restrictions will also ensure the diversity As wake boating increases in popularity, opportunities for other boaters decrease because of the large and dangerous disturbances these 10/1/2025 15:15 boating, Kayaking Average yes Protect the shoreline is a priority
291
10/9/2025 yes Fishing, boating, tubing, water skiing, kayak, paddle boat, jetskiWe have owned property for decades and the water quality has significantly decreased. Still a pretty clean lake but weeds have continued to impact areas more each year.Yes, I (we) agree with the current level and with current 3 day wait.Restrictions are in place to protect the lake and properties on the lake and are necessary.Would like to make sure wake boat restrictions are at 500ft and 20ft depth. Also enforcement for going too close to other recreational types (kayaks, fishing, etc)10/9/2025 yes Boating, kayaking -live on the lake 870' shorelineGood but not great B Grade, weeds have increased, clarity fluctuatesI agree to the 945' activation level, a higher level would begin to go over my shoreline into the yard@ the point. Damage from wakes would definitely increase.They meet the objective of protecting shoreline. I wouldn't recommend lowering it either since it would trigger more distracting from lake use.I think the focus needs to remain on protecting shoreline and not increasing level to reduce events.10/9/2025 yesall of the above! We pontoon, surf, paddleboard & kayak & fish & swim. We have 3 boys and love lake life! 2025 was a poorer water quality than previous years.I think it should remain at current levels--we've had unfortunate timing of slow-no wake the last two summers, but we have to balance the desire to keep beaches/shoreline in It is necessary to balance. I think exceptions could be made for July 4th water ski show & when water falls below the limit- no need to wait 3 day to resume normal lake activities.10/5/2025 16:35 yes boating, fishing, kayaking, waterski, wake board ok mo should be raised to 945.910/13/2025 15:43 yes fishing, skiing, paddle boarding, sea doo mediumnot at right level. too conservative. The larger concern isnt the level. Rather the impact of erosion from wake setter boats. Watch you tube (DNR) videos as to the destruction of raise restriction. Remove Wake Setter Boats at public boat launches. Reduce hours wake setters (homeowners on lake) can be used. they are destroying the wildlife in the lake. I hope Chan is progressive in conservation efforts and putting energies where it is most impactful. We live on lake and cannot enjoy the same activities due to the large wakes created10/13/2025 15:08 yes Everything but surf boarding goodThe highest point in 2025 spring/summer was the peek not needed. Any higher it is needed. So anytime higher than good when needed. NOt that im an expert but I may have one of the the lowest back yard on the lakeonly wake problem causers at levels 6 inches higher than 2025 peak levels are surfing boards with boats. Their goal is ocean waves. 6 10/13/2025 14:13 yespaddle board, swimming, boating, fishing, kayaking, waterskiing, tubing, wake surfing Good, but the zebra muscles are annoying No. I feel it is too low. I would like to see it raised to 945.9Our kids love to water ski and tube and the no wake has disrupted their activities on the water the last two summers. Thank you for your consideration!10/12/2025 20:00 yes Surfing, Stand Up Paddle Boarding, Kayaking, floatingSometimes good - sometimes murky - depends on the time of the seasonAs a homeowner/property - we believe it is acceptable and do not believe it should be raised higher.We are fine with the current slow-no-wake for residents, but that visitors need better awareness.10/12/2025 15:07 yes All the above Great No. It is way to low I think that if the limit is set to a reasonable level it is a good thing. 10/11/2025 9:31 All of the above Excellent It's too low. The limit should be 945.9.It's essentially a summer fun ban on Lake Minnewashta. Please raise the limit to 945.9!It's important to work closely with the Carver County Sheriff regarding any regulations to ensure that they are enforceable.10/10/2025 10:42 yes Boating, fishing, waterskiing One of the best in the seven county metro areaNo, please put it back to 945.9. If we become known as non-recreational lake this may affect property values which in turn can decrease tax revenue for the cityThey were put in place without transparency, without homeowner or other user input. It was put forward by people who have been anti-wake and anti-recreational use of lakeOne of the primary drivers of wake restriction purchased a home which was known to be under the 250 year flood plain,, broad policy is being made to accommodate the concerns of few10/9/2025 16:40 yes Kayak, paddle boarding, boating Ok No, it is too low No wake should only be in effect once over flood stage - levelWe have lived on Lake Minnewashta for over 20 years and find that most boats are respectful of the shoreline and keep distance 10/9/2025 9:16 yes boating, kayaking, waterskiing, wake boarding, wake surfing excellentNO. Raise the level back to 945.9. Not sure why it was changed!Lakes go up and down based on weather. If you live on a lake you take the risk of low and high-water levels. NO restrictions is my vote. Somebody is having swimming events on the lake without a permit. Also, anybody that lives on the lake and is on the city council should not 10/7/2025 10:48 yes Boating, kayaking, waterskiing, wake-boating GoodNo- it is not being enforced at the correct level. With known periods of high rain fall it needs to be adjusted for when it’s I am not opposed to restrictions, however it is not set at the right threshold. If waves are flowing into peoples yards that is a problem The threshold needs to be set at a backed up level not an average of 5 years… we’ve never had so many no wakes before and it’s a very active 10/6/2025 19:38 yes Kayaking, wake-boating, pontoon cruising, swimming GoodNo - the current no-wake level will cancel 75% of our 4th of July weeks. The June rains will always have water level peak June 30 based on the normal June rain cycle. They it always Raise it to a reasonable level. There was no sign of shore erosion at the current no-wake level. We should be proud of our amazing lake property not micro manage it. Many family reunions are July 4.There are normal cycles to the ice in winter and the rain in summer. The ice shift this year caused more damage than any high water years. It is the cost of owning a home on the lake to manage. 10/6/2025 16:43 Boating, wake surfing, paddle boarding Very good I feel it is two low I think they are an important aspect of lake protection.I believe the methodology should be consistent across Chanhassen lakes and set at the 100 year FEMA level, for Lake Minnewashta that is 10/6/2025 9:56 yes Fishing, wakesurfing, wakeboarding GreatIt is too low, and too restrictive. The prime periods of the season are disrupted every year now, for Minnewashta and They make sense in moderation and should be aligned with other lakes as well as with our new normal. Under the new normal, the We have a lot of shoreline. We understand the challenges. That said, we live here to be able to use the lake, and currently we are not able to as 10/6/2025 9:39 yes boating, fishing, kayaking good seems a bit low There has been lots of days with slow no wake July 4th weekend is timeframe that it is most upsetting10/6/2025 9:33 yes boating, fishing, kayaking, and wake-boating Good, clear but weeds are a problemThe limit should be raised to 945.9 feet. There is no negative effect on lake shore property owners (I am one). It's overly restrictive and limits use during peek season No necessary. The change to the lake level threshold a few years ago has lead to this lake being unused during the height of summer. The usage of this lake is very limited for 3/4 of the year. 10/6/2025 8:40 baoting, SUP, canoe Fair No I support raising the elevation to 945.9I do not feel they are necessary. I live on lake Minnewashta. It feels very much like a solution looking for a problem. 10/6/2025 7:36 yes Boating, fishing, kayaking, wake surfing Good No- it is too restrictive When appropriate, they are a positive. However, current restrictions are unreasonable and have significantly impacted summer 10/6/2025 5:42 yes Everything lake relatedGreat in the Spring and degrades with wake setter damage during the summer (churning up bottom) and with warmer waters, as well as lawn fertilizer use around the lake Too low and has resulted in unnecessary restrictions during key lake use and important family traditions/holidays.Not a fan of them, except within Little Minni where the boat launch is located.Minnewashta regional park had an initial restriction on size of motors and number of boats ... not sure how that requirement changed and I'd like to see those restrictions come back. 10/6/2025 5:41 yes I gosh, jetski, Waterski and pontoon. Great No, it is not at the right level. Raise the level and keep the slow no wake if it hits a higher level. Kick wake boats off the lake. Ski boats and pontoons are not the problem. Minnewashta is too small to have 25-30 wake boats going. 10/5/2025 21:27 Fishing, Kayaking, Waterskiing, Wake-boating, Swimming.The water quality of Lake Minnewashta is great, there are no issues with the quality.They are unneccesarily too low. It is not at the right level and needs to be raised at least 6 inches to accommodate reasonable use throughout the summer months.The past few years they have made an unnecessary impact on the community from general enjoyment of the lake to the loss of the waterski show on the 4th of July. The restrictions need to be 10/5/2025 20:31 yes boating, fishing, kayaking, waterskiing, swimming Good, too many weeds No, it is too low. Too many restrictions for little reasons Necessary when avoiding serious property damage10/5/2025 20:07 Boating surfing, jet skiing, paddle boarding Excellent Too low. It should be at the 945.9 ft level They are too restrictive the last couple of years. No10/5/2025 19:34 yes boating, skiing, fishing, SUPing, waterskiing, wake surfing good no, it is too low the depth needs to be increased. two years in a row we haven't been 10/5/2025 19:00 yes Waterskiing Great!No, would like it increased. I have lived on the lake since 1970 and it is clear to me that the water level abs and flows and we must consider new levels.With climate change and weather patterns changing, as a Lakeshore owner and water Skier I think we need to raise the levels so we can all enjoy the lake!!In the past when we’’ve had no wake zone, I see so many drop in voters ignoring the restriction. As a taxpayer and Lakeshore owner, this is very frustrating, so we need to set a new level. 10/5/2025 18:30 Boating, kayaking, paddle boarding Nice, clean No. It should be raised. They are too restrictive. They close down the lake during peak 10/5/2025 18:24 Boating waterskiing fishing Good No. It needs to be raised too restrictive 10/5/2025 17:49 yes boating, fishing, kayaking, waterskiing, wake-boating decent slow/no-wake threshold should be raised to 945.9 feetrestrictions should be be limited to flood levels. excessive regulations limit usefulness of resources and ultimately property 292
10/5/2025 17:41 yes Boating, tubing, wake boating Wonderfully clean water no, it’s too low. Threshold should be higher similar to other lakes in the area.They are necessary one at an inappropriate level to preserve ShorelinePlease consider raising the limit so residence can enjoy for recreational use similar to other lakes well so preserving the shoreline10/5/2025 17:29 yesBoat, jet ski, kayak, canoe, paddle board, water ski, tubing, swimming, fishing Medium. Lots of weeds. Zebra mussel proliferation. I would like to see it slightly higher, so there is less no-wake mid summer. I appreciate having a water level based no wake. I do NOT want a boat-type based restriction, such as distance from shore for wake I appreciate having a water level based no wake. I do NOT want a boat-type based restriction, such as distance from shore for wake boats. 10/5/2025 17:14 Boating Excellent No, threshold is too restrictive Lake Minnewashta doesn't seem busy enough to warrant no wake 10/5/2025 16:55 yes Boating, kayaking, SUP, wake surf & wake board GoodIt needs to be raised. I want the slow/no-wake threshold raised to 945.9 feet (Lake Minnewashta’s base flood level) They are FAR too restrictive.Please raise the level and allow residents to enjoy their lake access again. 10/5/2025 16:36 yes boating, average No, the past two years we have had a lot of rain in the spring and being of summer, And other years the lake has been low beginning of the summer. I feel it should be lower than 945.0it seems the people that have cut their shorelines down are the ones that are complaining.99% of the people that use the lake are considerate and wakeboarders and surfers are out in the middle of the lake and it make minimal in pack on the shoreline.10/5/2025 15:55 Boating surfing fishing wakeboarding jet skiing Good We need to raise the limit We need to raise the limit We chose to live on this lake for the ability to serve. No wake zone is causing people to not want to live around this lake.10/5/2025 15:37 yes Waterskiing Good Current restrictions are too strict10/5/2025 14:22 yes boating, fishing, wake boating, paddle boarding, tubingWe do not have any complaints regarding the quality of the water. The no wake elevation is set too high and I would suggest to raise the threshold to 945.9 feet - Lake Minnewashta's base The no-wake restriction has made the lake unusable for recreation, taking away the core family activities—boating, tubing, 10/5/2025 14:01 yes Fishing, boating, skiing, surfing Good It is too low, it seems we have an extended period of no wake They are unnecessary until very extreme circumstances Please raise the no wake level threshold 10/5/2025 13:57 yesBoating, fishing, kayaking, wake-surfing, wakeboarding, swimming, paddleboarding GoodNo. It is too low and has often inhibited recreation. I am extremely frustrated with it. I disagree with them unless scenarios are extreme (which I have never seen).Please raise Minnewashta's slow-no-wake limit. The 945.9 feet limit (Lake Minnewashta’s base flood level) is sufficient.10/5/2025 13:44Boating fishing kayaking paddleboarding beach swimming ice fishing Very good (minus the zebra mussels)No. There needs to be a scientific standard set which should dictate policy. They are needed to help preserve shoreline in historically high water level events. 10/5/2025 13:31 yes Paddle boarding, kayaking, fishing, boating, swimming Average. Too low. Should be raised to 945.9 feet which is Male Minnewashta’s base flood level. People are focused on their own agenda rather that the community amenity. If your shoreline is eroding, you shouldn’t have cut back the Neighbors are arguing over their personal opinions. The lake is a community amenity- not personal property. 10/5/2025 13:31 yes Kayak, surfing, swimming, boat Decent Need to be higher Do not agree with it Raise the limit so we don’t need restrictions 10/5/2025 13:29 yes Boating, wake boarding, wake surfing GoodThe level is too low. We have been repeatedly impacted by this - friends/family come from out of town and we end up having to go to another lake. Ridiculous. There is a balance between allowing recreation and protecting property. We own 1400 feet of frontage; we know living here means we have to expend time and money to protect our shoreline. So be it.The rights of the few should not be allowed to so unreasonably trump the rights of the many. 10/5/2025 13:26 yes Waterskiing. Paddleboarding ExcellentNo! We’ve lived on the lake for 20 years. It was changed in 2020 with no warning/discussion with any homeowners. We’ve owned three different properties on the lake the only s-They’ve been implemented by a few select people recently who do not represent the majority of homeowners, this will lower our property value as people buy on this lake for recreation Please put it back to where it’s been at 945.910/5/2025 13:15 yes Boating, fishing, kayaking, water sports Great The level is to low, needs to be raised They are appropriate for high levels in general but the threshold now 10/5/2025 13:06 Boating, water sports, swimming Appears clean and healthy It is set at an unreasonable level.It’s unreasonable to have no wake zone the way it’s been enforced the last handful of years. Go away with the restriction Can any lakeshore owner show any lakeshore damage from recent years lake level being what they were and boat traffic?10/5/2025 12:53 yes Boating, fishing, wake surfing Good No. Too low. Should be raised to 945.9 feet. 10/5/2025 12:51 Pontooning, fishing, waterskiing, swimming, SUP/kayak. Above averageThey are overly restrictive in threshold and 3 days clearance without scientific or accurate historical data, more restrictive than surrounding lakes,, have led to frequent and significant They have a role when accurate. The current restrictions impact nearly everyone’s use and enjoyment of the lake, for which they pay a premium, with activity at very specific levels necessary but at current levels impacting a few. 10/5/2025 12:38 yesWe use the lake for fishing, swimming, paddle boarding, kayaking, boating, tubing and surfing Very goodI don’t think it’s at the appropriate level, since we moved into the lake there has been more days of slow no wake compared to other similar lakes in the area. The restrictions for slow no wake do need to exist to proctect the lake shore/environment in appropriate situations 10/5/2025 12:17 yesFishing, swimming, wake boating, kayaking, jet ski, paddle boatd Very goodThe current slow-no-wake level is too low. We’ve lived on the lake for a decade and we have winds blowing at us regularly that create more waves on our beach than boats do.When used at appropriate levels they are beneficial to the lake and people who enjoy using the lake.The level set at 945.9 would be appropriate. It’s a 100 year FEMA approved level that would protect the shoreline during actual flood conditions.10/5/2025 12:02 yes Boating, fishing, kayak, jet ski, water ski, surf, swim Good It’s too low They’re fine - use respect and courtesy of peoples shoreline, docks, 10/5/2025 12:00 yes Boating, water skiing, wake boating, kayaking, paddle boarding, Good No, it should be raised to 945.9 Fine if the water is too high but needs to be a realistic level (ours was No other lake’s stayed closed as long as ours and lake Minnetonka 10/4/2025 14:31 Kayaking I think it’s degraded I think the restriction should increase I support them 10/4/2025 13:31 Boating Decent except for the weeks and zebra muscles I would like it to be raisedI would like the whole lake level to be raised. There are time when I have to pull my boat because of low lake levels. I would like to hear other people’s comments as mine are from my perspective only. 10/3/2025 17:44 yesBoating, Fishing, Paddle boarding, swimming, wake surfing, jet ski, tubing Excellent. Which is why we bought a property on the lake.It is set too low, we have had over 6 times the amount vs surrounding lakes in Chanhassen in the last 2 years They are an important part of environmental stewardship Set the level at the 100 year FEMA LEVEL OF 945.9 feet so the shoreline is protected during flooding conditions and lake users are not limited in 10/1/2025 21:40 boating, swimming, kayaking Fair. The weeds can be bad.No, it is not the right level. It should be higher. The past few years we have had no wake restrictions, while the water level We need them, but they need to be relaxed. When there is a problem, it also seems too long to lift the restriction.Restricting skiing and surfing areas might be helpful to save the shorelines.10/1/2025 19:07Boating, water-skiing, tubing, wake boarding, but we do not have a wake surf boat GreatIt should be tiered based on type of wake. Wake surf boats using ballast should have a lower slow-no-wake restriction. The elevation level should be raised for most but lowered for Valid to protect property and shorelineIt's very hard to find out if the lake has a restriction. We packed up all our boating stuff drove all the way to the lake, only to have the DNR guy tell us. The info isn't posted anywhere.10/1/2025 17:32 yes Boating fishing surfing paddle boarding Fair could have better weed control No I feel it should be higher It limits a lotboat users it’s a public lake and people should be able 10/1/2025 17:17 yes Pontooning. fishing, kayaking, jetskiing OK. Level needs to be higher. Appears to be no scientific evidence behind 945.0. Restrictions should be no wake after 3 consecutive days above level & continue until 1 day below level.Need push notification to notify about no wake when on & off. Also need a link on City website where we can view the daily levels being 10/1/2025 14:18 yesWake surfing, pontoon boating, paddle boarding, swimming, kayaking Good, but too many weedsI think it needs to be raised. It’s too restrictive. I believe there is a proposal to raise to 945.9. I would support that number. I think all boaters should exercise polite and safe boating activities. I would prefer that there were no restrictions at all, but I understand I support the 100 year FEMA level at 945.9. To protect shoreline and allow for reasonable enjoyment for boaters. 10/1/2025 13:21 yesKayaking, paddle boarding, waterskiing, wake surfing, sunset cruising, swimming, fishing, etc. Very good It is set too low. We are running into restrictions every year yet the weather pattern is the same. Meaning it is the norm not They are important. We have reviewed the data and believe the level is set too low. The level should be set to the 100 year FEMA flood level to protect the lake during 10/1/2025 13:08 Recreational watersports, fishing, kayaking, waterski show Water clarity is good and phosphorus is lowNo, the level is set too low. It should match Lake Minnewashta's base flood elevation of 945.9.No-wake restrictions are essentially recreational watersports bans when set below flood levels.Raise the limit to 945.9. If you want to improve water quality, there are far more effective approaches than banning recreational watersports.10/1/2025 13:02 All except wake boating. GoodNo. The level is to low as we have had more no wake restrictions than other lakes around us. They are fine if managed appropriately Raise the limit to the fema documented limit293
10/1/2025 12:58 yesBoating, fishing, swimming, kayaking, skiing, winter activities, wakeboarding Very goodNo. Should be raised to 945.9. The science behind the current limit is minimal. Restrictions on distance from shore should not be in place. Restrictions on water level should be in place but should be raised ln 10/1/2025 10:38 yes Boating, wake boating, waterskiing, fishing Good, would appreciate more weed control No, it should be higher or be removedThis year has shown a dramatic improvement in large boater behavior, with users consistantly using the center of the lake and avoiding high waves on shore. Post a sign at the boat launch to Boaters want to do the right thing, they just need to be informed.10/1/2025 9:57 yesBoating, fishing, paddle boarding, swimming, waterskiing, wake surfing, tubing, boating ExcellentIt is set too low. We have too many slow/no wake days compared to other Chanhassen lakes They are an important element of environmental stewardship Set the level at the 100 year FEMA level of 945.9 feet so the shoreline is protected during flood conditions, and lake users are not limited in their 10/1/2025 9:49 yes Boating, kayaking, waterskiing, wake-boating, sup excellent no. It’s too low. It’s okay when there is risk of actual flooding. That does not occur at the 945 level. We have kived on the lake for over 50 years and 945 is Boaters on Lake Minnewashta are extremely well behaved. Additional restrictions are not needed and no wake trigger levels should be raised 10/9/2025 yes Boating, fishing, kayaking, waterskiing & paddle boardinggenerally good/clean, weedy problem areas, zebra mussels, worry about erosion on point only Would like to see it raised to 945.9 Necessary in places to preserve lakeshoreWould be interested in seeing if there are any outflow opportunities in the north bay10/9/2025 yes Kayaking, paddle board, swim, surf okwould like to see fewer restriction days. Remove 3 days. Raise by an inch or two Sadly take a lot of great family boat days10/9/2025 yes Remove restriction or at least raise to 945.9 Read full Letter sent10/9/2025 yesSwimming, canoeing, kayaking,paddleboarding, boating, tubing & waterskiing-hiking & icefishing in winterour greater family concern for lake health lies in weed overgrowth and continued spread of invasive zebra revisit and medestly increase the current no-wake water level threshold Read full Letter sent
294
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item Third Quarter 2025 Economic Development Activity Report
File No.Item No: J.1
Agenda Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION
Prepared By Sam DiMaggio, Economic Development Manager
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
N/A
Motion Type N/A
Strategic
Priority Development & Redevelopment
SUMMARY
Staff has compiled the Third Quarter Report, providing a summary of the Economic Development
Department’s activities and business-related insights.
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
295
ATTACHMENTS
Third Quarter Report
296
2025 Economic
Development Activity
3rd Quarter
1
SUMMARY OF FORMAL AND INFORMAL BUSINESS VISITS
Q1 Staff has been working with local property owners and developers on the potential growth and
expansion of their properties within the City of Chanhassen, helping them maximize the use of their
land and buildings. In addition, a growing number of developers have reached out to staff seeking
available properties or assistance with sites they already own locally. Recently, staff sent
introductory letters to 29 Chanhassen businesses and their corresponding property owners—those
with either Chaska or Excelsior mailing addresses—to inform them of the new Local Option Sales Tax
that took effect on April 1, 2025. Since this may have been the first point of contact with the city for
some recipients, the letters also introduced key departments and resources available to support
them. Additionally, staff supported the Engineering Department with business outreach to 50 local
businesses in connection with the Market Boulevard project and the outreach meeting held on
February 14, 2025.
Q2 The businesses visited this quarter consistently expressed a desire to strengthen their visibility and
reputation within the community. Many are interested in marketing themselves both to residents
and to other businesses, aiming to demonstrate their value as contributors to the local economy and
as engaged community partners. They want to be known not only for the products or services they
provide, but also for their role in supporting a thriving and connected community. Employers also
emphasized the importance of being recognized as “employers of choice.” They want to attract and
retain a talented workforce by creating positive work environments, offering competitive
opportunities, and maintaining a strong presence in the marketplace. A common theme that
emerged was the need for affordable housing options for employees. Business leaders recognize
that accessible housing is directly tied to workforce stability, recruitment, and retention, and they
see it as a critical factor in sustaining both their business es and the overall economic vitality of
Chanhassen.
Q3 Staff engaged with several developers who are actively exploring ways to maximize the use of their
parcels in alignment with existing Planned Unit Development (PUD) or zoning regulations, while also
contributing to the vitality of the city’s commercial districts. We also met with apartment developers
to review proposed projects, ensuring compliance with zoning, building, and fire codes,
responsiveness to current market conditions, and financial feasibility within their budgets. During
these conversations, staff shared potential funding opportunities that could support project
implementation. Additionally, developers with Industrial Office Park (IOP) designated parcels
expressed concerns about the ongoing lack of demand for light industrial or office space end users.
Others with surplus land are considering expansions or repurposing strategies, and many have
requested greater flexibility in permitted uses as they evaluate alternative development options.
297
2025 Economic
Development Activity
3rd Quarter
2
NEW CHANHASSEN BUSINESSES
Cheesecake Funk (2419 MN-7) Drive Coffee Roasters (2915 Water Tower Pl)
Hope Breakfast Bar (464 Lake Drive, Suite 100) Jump Start Adventure Park (18812 Lake Dr E)
Lean Kitchen CO. (7860 Century Blvd) OG Coffee & Wine Bar (600 Market Street, Suite 110)
Pro Nail & Lounge (464 Lake Drive, Suite 110) Xfinity Store by Comcast (464 Lake Drive, Suite 130)
BUSINESS VISITS
Q1 Dandy Lion Coffee, Hansen Hometech, Kraus Anderson, and Phillips Edison & Company.
Q2 Holiday Inn Express & Suites Chanhassen by IHG, Hope House, and IWCO.
Q3 Buhl Investors, Jump Start Adventure Park, Xcel Energy, and Xfinity/Comcast.
Business Featured in the Local Video Series
Q1 The OG Coffee and Wine Bar (Julie Jost)
Q2 Federal Package (Melissa Niebes), Na’s Thia Café (Na Monthisane & Christina Kirksey), and Golf Zone
(Brian Colvin).
Q3 Lakewinds (Renee Winslet), and Campfire MN (Kori Redepenning)
SAC PROGRAM BUSINESS UTILIZATION
Business
Type of Business
Total
Assessed
City
Credits
Value of
Waiver
Q1 Driven Coffee Roasters (2915 Water Tower Pl) Light Manufacturing 1 1 $12,080
Q2 Lil Metros Daycare (7580 Quattro Drive) Employee Daycare 1 1 $12,080
Q3 Liora Nails & Spa (500 W. 79th Street, Suite 100) Nail Salon 1 1 $12,080
298
2025 Economic
Development Activity
3rd Quarter
3
REQUESTED ASSISTANCE
(via email or in-person meeting) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
TOTAL
YTD
Business Planning 0 2 0 2
eCommerce 1 0 0 1
Funding (Grants, TIF, etc.) 0 4 0 4
Human Resources 0 2 0 2
Marketing and Sales 3 13 7 23
Market Research 1 0 3 4
Mentoring 1 0 3 4
Non-Profit Issues 0 4 0 4
Property Development 43 65 21 129
Regulatory Compliance 0 4 0 4
Site Location 24 21 9 54
Start-up Assistance 7 3 7 17
Strategic Planning 0 6 0 6
Tax Planning 0 0 1 1
TOTAL 89 124 48 261
MEETING TYPE
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
TOTAL
YTD
Businesses 2 3 5 10
Non-Profits & Government 1 1 3 5
Entrepreneurs 1 2 2 5
Brokers/Developers 5 6 3 14
TOTAL INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS 9 12 13 34
299
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item Third Quarter 2025 Communications Update
File No.Item No: J.2
Agenda Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION
Prepared By Patrick Gavin, Communications Manager
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
N/A
Motion Type N/A
Strategic
Priority Communications
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
DISCUSSION
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
Communications Third Quarter Update
300
Chanhassen
Communications:
Impact Insights
Q3 2025
301
Email Newsletters
-Total Subscribers: 16,523 (+2.7%from this month, previous year)
-Most popular email lists:
•"Message from the Mayor" (11,848 subscribers,-3.1%from this
month previous year)
•"Park and Recreation Programs"(7,015 subscribers,–8%from this
month previous year)
•Chan-Happenings (6,350 subscribers,+4.2%from this month
previous year)
-Number of newsletters sent during the quarter: 119 (unchanged from
previous quarter).
2 302
Email Newsletters
-Top Five Open Rates (% of emails opened):
“Proposed Development Projects” (61%) (August 18)
"Proposed Development Projects (60%) (September 16)
“Proposed Development Projects” (60%) (August 7)
"Proposed Development Projects" (56%) (July 24)
"Proposed Developments" (54%) (August 18)
3 303
Social Media
Q3 2025:
Q3 2024:
4 304
Social Media
Subscriber Change (compared to previous qtr):
Facebook: +279 new followers
Instagram: +291new followers
Twitter/X: +6 new followers
LinkedIn: +43 new followers
5 305
Social Media
Top Facebook Performers:
6 306
Social Media
Top Facebook Reels Performers:
7
Fire Department Open House Promotional
Video: 20,503 views, 170 interactions
E-Bike Educational Video:11,128 views, 91
interactions
Market Blvd reopen to traffic.8988 views, 66
interactions
307
Social Media
Top Instagram Performers:
8 308
Social Media
Top Twitter/X Performers:
9 309
Social Media
Top YouTube Performers:
10 310
ChanhassenMN.gov
Total Active Visitors: 52,460 (-27.16% from Q3 2024)
Total Views:172,397(-16.88 from Q3 2024)
Total Sessions: 101,329 (-15.75 from Q3 2024)
11
“Active Visitors”: The total number of people who visited our website. Each person is counted once,
no matter how many times they visit.
“Sessions”: The total visits to our website. Each time someone comes to the site, it starts a new
session, even if they’re a returning visitor.
“Page Views”: The total number of pages viewed. Every time a page loads, it counts as one view,
including repeat views of the same page.
311
ChanhassenMN.gov
12
Top 10 Most Visited Pages
312
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item Discuss Acquisition of PID 25.8680100, a tax-forfeited parcel
File No.N/A Item No: K.1
Agenda Section CLOSED SESSION
Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
Item #1
Motion to enter a closed session that will involve discussion of bid strategy related to tax-forfeited
parcel PID 25.8680100, for which the City is eligible to submit a sealed bid.
Item #2
Authorize staff to submit a sealed bid to Carver County for the purchase of tax-forfeited property
(PID 25.8680100) adjacent to City-owned land, and approve use of Sewer Utility Fund dollars for
the bid and associated closing costs.
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Asset Management
SUMMARY
Carver County notified the City that tax-forfeited parcel PID 25.8680100 is being offered for sale
through a private sealed-bid process restricted to adjoining landowners. This approach is required under
recent changes to state tax-forfeiture statutes, which no longer allow counties to designate forfeited
parcels for conveyance directly to governmental entities prior to public sale.
313
Per the County’s notice:
Local governments are no longer automatically eligible to acquire forfeited parcels prior to
attempted sale.
Counties must attempt sale of qualifying tax-forfeited parcels annually through 2029.
The current sale format is a private sealed bid limited to adjoining property owners.
Bids are due to Carver County by 9:00 a.m. on November 17, 2025.
Because the City owns land directly adjacent to PID 25.8680100, we qualify as an eligible bidder this
year. Future eligibility may depend on statutory cycles and ownership status at the time of future
offerings.
Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §13D.05, subd. 3(c), the City Council may meet in closed session to develop or
consider offers or counteroffers for the purchase of real property when public discussion would harm
the City’s bargaining position.
BACKGROUND
Parcel 25.8680100 contains multiple existing public improvements, including:
City owned sanitary sewer lines and manholes
City owned paved multi-use trail
MCES sewer interceptor and manhole
These facilities represent essential public infrastructure already serving the community. Acquisition of
the property would:
Protect and secure existing sewer assets and trail facilities
Ensure continued access for inspection and maintenance
Avoid future conflicts if a third party acquires the parcel
Provide flexibility for long-term utility and trail planning
DISCUSSION
314
N/A
BUDGET
The bid amount will be submitted through the private sealed process. Final cost will depend on bid
competitiveness. Staff anticipates the cost will be consistent with similar tax-forfeited land valuations.
Funding is recommended from the Sewer Utility Fund given the presence of sanitary infrastructure.
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution
Parcel Location - 258680100
Parcel Location - 258680100 no aerial
315
1
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
DATE:____November 10, 2025_________ RESOLUTION NO: ___2025-XX____________
MOTION BY:____________________ SECONDED BY:__________________________
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF A SEALED BID FOR TAX-
FORFEITED PROPERTY (PID 25.8680100) AND APPROVING BID AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, Carver County has notified the City of Chanhassen that tax-forfeited parcel
PID 25.8680100 is being offered for sale through a private sealed-bid process limited to adjoining
landowners pursuant to applicable state statute; and
WHEREAS, recent changes to Minnesota statutes require counties to attempt annual sale of
eligible tax-forfeited property through 2029, and no longer permit direct conveyance of certain
forfeited parcels to governmental agencies prior to attempted sale; and
WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen is an adjoining landowner to parcel PID 25.8680100
and therefore eligible to submit a sealed bid during the 2025 offering; and
WHEREAS, the subject parcel contains existing City sanitary sewer infrastructure, an
established public trail corridor, and the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES)
interceptor line, making the parcel critical for continued utility access, maintenance, and public use;
and
WHEREAS, acquisition of the parcel will protect existing public infrastructure, secure
long-term trail access, and preserve future operational and planning flexibility; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a closed session pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 13D.05, subd.
3(c), to develop and review confidential bidding strategy for acquisition of the property, and such
strategy requires confidentiality to protect the public interest and the City’s negotiating position;
and
WHEREAS, the sealed bid must be submitted to Carver County by 9:00 a.m. on
November 17, 2025, and authorization is required to allow staff to timely act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council that staff
are hereby authorized and directed to submit a sealed bid to Carver County for acquisition of
parcel PID 25.8680100; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council authorizes a maximum bid amount
as discussed in closed session, and authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute and
submit necessary forms and payment instruments consistent with that direction; and
316
2
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, funding for the acquisition is approved from the Sewer
Utility Fund, with the option for Parks and Recreation Fund cost-share to reflect trail
interests, and the City Manager is authorized to complete all necessary steps to effectuate the
purchase if the City is the successful bidder.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 10th day of November, 2025.
ATTEST:
___________________________________ ___________________________________
Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor
YES NO ABSENT
317
258680100
Lake Susan
Missio n Hills
D
r Marsh
D
r
M a in S tD a k o t a Ln
MayfieldCtMission Hills Ct
P
o
n
d
P
r
om
e
n
a
d
e
W
8
6th
St MissionHillsLnSinn e n C irL a k e D r
T
i
g
u
a
L
nMissionHillsCirGrandviewRdWaters Edge DrLake Susan
Park
Rice Marsh
Lake Preserve
GreatPlainsBlvdMa
r
k
e
t
B
lv
d
ST101
Document Path: K:\Departments\Admin\Parcel Location'\Parcel Location'.aprxDate Created: 11/3/2025
Created By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department µ0 0.06
Mile
0 300
Feet
PID 258680100
City of Chanhassen
318
258680100
Lake Susan
Missio n Hills
D
r Marsh
D
r
M a in S tD a k o t a Ln
MayfieldCtMission Hills Ct
P
o
n
d
P
r
om
e
n
a
d
e
W
8
6th
St MissionHillsLnSinn e n C irL a k e D r
T
i
g
u
a
L
nMissionHillsCirGrandviewRdWaters Edge DrLake Susan
Park
Rice Marsh
Lake Preserve
GreatPlainsBlvdMa
r
k
e
t
B
lv
d
ST101
Document Path: K:\Departments\Admin\Parcel Location'\Parcel Location'.aprxDate Created: 11/3/2025
Created By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department µ0 0.06
Mile
0 300
Feet
PID 258680100
City of Chanhassen
319
City Council Item
November 10, 2025
Item Discuss Acquisition of PID 25.8680100, a tax-forfeited parcel
File No.N/A Item No: L.1
Agenda Section GENERAL BUSINESS
Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager
Reviewed By
SUGGESTED ACTION
Item #1
Motion to enter a closed session that will involve discussion of bid strategy related to tax-forfeited
parcel PID 25.8680100, for which the City is eligible to submit a sealed bid.
Item #2
Authorize staff to submit a sealed bid to Carver County for the purchase of tax-forfeited property
(PID 25.8680100) adjacent to City-owned land, and approve use of Sewer Utility Fund dollars for
the bid and associated closing costs.
Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present
Strategic
Priority Asset Management
SUMMARY
Carver County notified the City that tax-forfeited parcel PID 25.8680100 is being offered for sale
through a private sealed-bid process restricted to adjoining landowners. This approach is required under
recent changes to state tax-forfeiture statutes, which no longer allow counties to designate forfeited
parcels for conveyance directly to governmental entities prior to public sale.
320
Per the County’s notice:
Local governments are no longer automatically eligible to acquire forfeited parcels prior to
attempted sale.
Counties must attempt sale of qualifying tax-forfeited parcels annually through 2029.
The current sale format is a private sealed bid limited to adjoining property owners.
Bids are due to Carver County by 9:00 a.m. on November 17, 2025.
Because the City owns land directly adjacent to PID 25.8680100, we qualify as an eligible bidder this
year. Future eligibility may depend on statutory cycles and ownership status at the time of future
offerings.
Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §13D.05, subd. 3(c), the City Council may meet in closed session to develop or
consider offers or counteroffers for the purchase of real property when public discussion would harm
the City’s bargaining position.
BACKGROUND
Parcel 25.8680100 contains multiple existing public improvements, including:
City owned sanitary sewer lines and manholes
City owned paved multi-use trail
MCES sewer interceptor and manhole
These facilities represent essential public infrastructure already serving the community. Acquisition of
the property would:
Protect and secure existing sewer assets and trail facilities
Ensure continued access for inspection and maintenance
Avoid future conflicts if a third party acquires the parcel
Provide flexibility for long-term utility and trail planning
DISCUSSION
321
N/A
BUDGET
The bid amount will be submitted through the private sealed process. Final cost will depend on bid
competitiveness. Staff anticipates the cost will be consistent with similar tax-forfeited land valuations.
Funding is recommended from the Sewer Utility Fund given the presence of sanitary infrastructure.
RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution
Parcel Location - 258680100
Parcel Location - 258680100 no aerial
322
1
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
DATE:____November 10, 2025_________ RESOLUTION NO: ___2025-XX____________
MOTION BY:____________________ SECONDED BY:__________________________
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF A SEALED BID FOR TAX-
FORFEITED PROPERTY (PID 25.8680100) AND APPROVING BID AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, Carver County has notified the City of Chanhassen that tax-forfeited parcel
PID 25.8680100 is being offered for sale through a private sealed-bid process limited to adjoining
landowners pursuant to applicable state statute; and
WHEREAS, recent changes to Minnesota statutes require counties to attempt annual sale of
eligible tax-forfeited property through 2029, and no longer permit direct conveyance of certain
forfeited parcels to governmental agencies prior to attempted sale; and
WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen is an adjoining landowner to parcel PID 25.8680100
and therefore eligible to submit a sealed bid during the 2025 offering; and
WHEREAS, the subject parcel contains existing City sanitary sewer infrastructure, an
established public trail corridor, and the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES)
interceptor line, making the parcel critical for continued utility access, maintenance, and public use;
and
WHEREAS, acquisition of the parcel will protect existing public infrastructure, secure
long-term trail access, and preserve future operational and planning flexibility; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a closed session pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 13D.05, subd.
3(c), to develop and review confidential bidding strategy for acquisition of the property, and such
strategy requires confidentiality to protect the public interest and the City’s negotiating position;
and
WHEREAS, the sealed bid must be submitted to Carver County by 9:00 a.m. on
November 17, 2025, and authorization is required to allow staff to timely act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council that staff
are hereby authorized and directed to submit a sealed bid to Carver County for acquisition of
parcel PID 25.8680100; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council authorizes a maximum bid amount
as discussed in closed session, and authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute and
submit necessary forms and payment instruments consistent with that direction; and
323
2
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, funding for the acquisition is approved from the Sewer
Utility Fund, with the option for Parks and Recreation Fund cost-share to reflect trail
interests, and the City Manager is authorized to complete all necessary steps to effectuate the
purchase if the City is the successful bidder.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 10th day of November, 2025.
ATTEST:
___________________________________ ___________________________________
Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor
YES NO ABSENT
324
258680100
Lake Susan
Missio n Hills
D
r Marsh
D
r
M a in S tD a k o t a Ln
MayfieldCtMission Hills Ct
P
o
n
d
P
r
om
e
n
a
d
e
W
8
6th
St MissionHillsLnSinn e n C irL a k e D r
T
i
g
u
a
L
nMissionHillsCirGrandviewRdWaters Edge DrLake Susan
Park
Rice Marsh
Lake Preserve
GreatPlainsBlvdMa
r
k
e
t
B
lv
d
ST101
Document Path: K:\Departments\Admin\Parcel Location'\Parcel Location'.aprxDate Created: 11/3/2025
Created By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department µ0 0.06
Mile
0 300
Feet
PID 258680100
City of Chanhassen
325
258680100
Lake Susan
Missio n Hills
D
r Marsh
D
r
M a in S tD a k o t a Ln
MayfieldCtMission Hills Ct
P
o
n
d
P
r
om
e
n
a
d
e
W
8
6th
St MissionHillsLnSinn e n C irL a k e D r
T
i
g
u
a
L
nMissionHillsCirGrandviewRdWaters Edge DrLake Susan
Park
Rice Marsh
Lake Preserve
GreatPlainsBlvdMa
r
k
e
t
B
lv
d
ST101
Document Path: K:\Departments\Admin\Parcel Location'\Parcel Location'.aprxDate Created: 11/3/2025
Created By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department µ0 0.06
Mile
0 300
Feet
PID 258680100
City of Chanhassen
326