Loading...
10-13-2025 City Council Agneda and PakcetA.5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Note: Unless otherwise noted, work sessions are held in the Training Room on the main level of the new City Hall and are open to the public. If the City Council does not complete the work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda. Public comment is not allowed at the work session. A.1 Lake Minnewashta Slow-No Wake Elevation A.2 Fire Department Staffing Discussion A.3 Future Work Session Schedule B.7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance) C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS D.CONSENT AGENDA All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to the council packet for each staff report. D.1 Approve City Council Meeting Minutes dated September 22, 2025 D.2 Approve City Council Work Session Minutes dated September 22, 2025. D.3 Approve City Council Special Work Session Minutes dated September 29, 2025 D.4 Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated September 16, 2025 D.5 Approve Claims Paid dated October 13, 2025 D.6 Approve Temporary Liquor License, Hackamore Brewing to host the SW Chamber of AGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2025 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD 1 Commerce Gala D.7 Approve Encroachment Agreement for 8465 Mission Hills Lane D.8 Approve Encroachment Agreement at 6609 Horeshoe Curv D.9 Approve Amendments to Stormwater Management Agreements for Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, of Fox Ridge Estates. (Planning Case 2022-10) D.10 Award Construction Contract for Driveway Improvements at Lake Lucy Ground Storage Reservoir D.11 Approve Partial Release of Development Contract D.12 Approve Development Contract for Avienda Apartments (Planning Case 25-08) D.13 Resolution 2025-XX; Call for Public Hearing to Order the Market Boulevard Improvement Project D.14 Resolution 2025-XX: Highway 5 Improvement Project authorizations E.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda). F.FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE F.1 Quarterly Fire Department Update F.2 Quarterly Law Enforcement Update G.PUBLIC HEARINGS G.1 Resolution #2025-XX, Approve vacating a portion of the public Right-of-Way of Dogwood Road H.GENERAL BUSINESS H.1 Ordinance: XXX Minnewashta Apartments Rezoning and Site Plan Review (Planning Case 25-11) I.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS J.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS K.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION L.ADJOURNMENT GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the 2 Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations. Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required to complete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available at https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior to the meeting. A total of thirty minutes is alloted for Visitor Presentations. Priority is given to Chanhassen residents. An additional thirty minutes may be provided after General Business items are complete at the discretion of the City Council. Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City Council. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson that can summarize the issue. Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. Comments may also be emailed to the City Council at council@chanhassenmn.gov. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be directed to the City Manager. Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Tequila Butcher, 590 West 79th Street in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the public are welcome. 3 City Council Item October 13, 2025 Item Lake Minnewashta Slow-No Wake Elevation File No.N/A Item No: A.1 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION N/A - Discussion only Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Operational Excellence SUMMARY In response to a Citizen Action Request received from a Chanhassen resident back on July 14, 2025, along with numerous other requests on the same topic, the City Council directed staff to look into the existing Slow-No Wake Elevation for Lake Minnewashta. Staff has done some research and has developed options for the City Council to consider. BACKGROUND The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 642 in June 2019 which established the current elevation of 945.00 as the Slow-No Wake threshold for Lake Minnewashta. Staff is hosting a public open house on the topic on Thursday October 9, 2025 at City Hall. DISCUSSION Staff will give the City Council a presentation at the work session which will include: 4 A summary of the request Definitions related to the topic The history around the topic Considerations concerning the topic Process and timeline A summary of the public open house comments held on October 9, 2025. BUDGET N/A RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS Citizen Action Request Slow-No Wake Lake Minnewashta Ordinance Update 2025 Draft Report 5 Complete this form and submit it prior to the City Council meeting date you wish to present your request. The City of Chanhassen invites citizens to submit a request in their native or preferred language. Upon doing so, the city will utilize its resources and do everything in its power to translate the request appropriately. Select City Council Meeting date you would like to attend: 07/14/2025 In 2024, the Chanhassen City Council meets on the second and fourth Mondays of each month. Printable Meeting Calendar View and/or print this calendar to assist with determining when city council meetings are held in order to make your date selection above. Resident Information * Name McKenna Ewen * Address 3850 Glendale Drive Chanhassen MN 55331 * Phone * Email Council Action Requested * Provide a brief description of the action you are requesting from the City Council. On behalf of more than 100 individuals, we are collectively requesting an amendment to raise the no-wake limit on Lake Minnewashta to 945.9 ft. Summary of Information * Provide a narrative of the request including need, costs, timetable, background, etc. Minnewashta’s original no-wake limit was proposed using FEMA’s 100-year flood level. In 2019, the city modified the proposal to use a rounded 10-year average instead of FEMA's Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of 945.9 ft. This amendment restores the ordinance to its original language using an established hydrologic benchmark. This request aligns with federal and state standards. Chanhassen uses this benchmark to establish its no-wake limit on Lake Lucy, which the Minnesota DNR approved in May 2020. The current no-wake limit of 945.0 ft falls within Lake Minnewashta’s typical water-level range. The lake has exceeded its no-wake limit in 17 of the past 25 years. As a result, this ordinance has limited lake use on Lake Minnewashta far more often than other Chanhassen lakes. What Happens Next? Immediately upon submission of this form, staff will be notified by email and will provide copies to the City Council prior to the selected meeting date. Contact Questions? Contact City Clerk Jenny Potter at 952-227-1107 or by email. Page | 1 6 Slow-No-Wake Restriction on Lake Minnewashta I. Introduction This report reviews the history, purpose, and current conditions of Lake Minnewashta’s slow-no wake (SNW) elevation and provides considerations for potential adjustments. Slow-no wake regulations temporarily restrict watercraft speeds when water levels are elevated, requiring boats to operate at the slowest speed necessary (approximately 5 MPH) to maintain steerage and minimize wake. The primary objectives are to protect public safety, reduce shoreline erosion, safeguard docks and private property, and preserve water quality. Lake Minnewashta’s SNW elevation is currently set at 945.0 feet which is 0.5 feet higher than the Ordinary High-Water Level (OHWL). The SNW elevation was set in 2019 and is based on a 10-year water level analysis, shoreline and erosion review, and public engagement. This benchmark reflects relatively uncommon high-water marks from prolonged wet weather and/or large storm events, and provides a practical standard that balances recreation, property protection, and environmental stewardship. During the past two years (2024 and 2025) rainfall events caused the SNW restriction to be placed on area lakes during the 4th of July Holiday. As a result of the untimely nature, City Council and Staff received feedback from residents concerned with the SNW ordinance and triggering elevation. A Citizen Action Request with a proposal to raise the SNW elevation on Lake Minnewashta was submitted on July 14, 2025. II. Lake Minnewashta Overview Lake Minnewashta spans approximately 700 acres with an average depth of 15 feet and a maximum depth near 70 feet. Its shoreline stretches roughly 8.9 miles. The lake supports aquatic plants, fish habitat, and recreational activities. Water quality is generally good, though invasive species such as Eurasian watermilfoil and zebra mussels are present. Localized shoreline erosion has been observed. Shoreline erosion and watershed nutrient loading occasionally affect water clarity. The shoreline features a mix of developed residential areas and natural sections. Lawns, docks, and riprap dominate private property, while public parkland and undeveloped areas retain native vegetation buffers. 7 Recreational use is diverse, centered on Lake Minnewashta Regional Park, which offers swimming, boating, fishing, trails, and seasonal activities including ice fishing and winter trail use. Boating is popular both from adjacent property owners, but also visitors using the public boat launch. Wakeboarding and other high-wake activities have increased in popularity recently, highlighting the need to balance recreational demand with environmental protection. III. Historical Review The first slow-no wake ordinance in Chanhassen was adopted on July 11, 1983 (Ordinance No. 73), establishing speed restrictions on marked slow-no wake areas. Subsequent amendments addressed evolving community needs, environmental concerns, and regulatory standards. • 2003, Ordinance No. 356: Updated provisions and state law integration. • 2006, Ordinances No. 418 & 419: Refinements for specific lakes including Lotus Lake and Lake Susan. • 2019, Ordinance No. 642: Trigger thresholds updated on Chanhassen Lakes, including Lake Minnewashta set to 945.0 • 2020, Ordinance No. 655: Further alignment with hydrologic benchmarks and DNR approvals. Current slow-no wake elevations for nearby lakes: Lake SNW Elevation Lotus Lake 896.30’ Lake Lucy 957.24’ Lake Minnewashta 945.00’ Lake Susan 882.50’ Changes to SNW thresholds can be made anytime via a formal process, including public hearings, ordinance publishing, and a 120-day review by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Water levels are continuously monitored by city and watershed with the use of real-time water level sensors, and SNW restrictions are enforced once thresholds are confirmed by city staff. 8 IV. Slow -No Wake Elevation Determination In Minnesota, SNW elevations are established to protect shorelines, aquatic habitat, and private property. Determination relies on: • Historical water level monitoring (DNR, local lake associations, city programs) • Assessment of shoreline vulnerability, including erosion and flood risks • Input from property owners, environmental experts, and stakeholders Once established, elevations are communicated through posted signage, public alerts, and lake association notices. V. Data and Trends Water level data and SNW restriction frequency of Lake Minnewashta was compared to Lotus Lake, which is the most similar Lake in Chanhassen with respect to recreational use. Analysis of the past 10 years shows: Lake SNW Enforcement Water Level Exceeded Threshold Highest Level Lake Minnewashta 2 times (since 2019) 5 times 945.3’ (June 2024) Lotus Lake 3 times (since 2019) 5 times — Lake Minnewashta tends to have longer SNW enforcement periods despite a higher elevation threshold compared to Lotus Lake, which uses the OHWL as a benchmark. This is due to the watershed characteristics. Lake Minnewashta has a larger watershed with less impervious surface and more upland storage compared to Lotus Lake which results in a slower draining system. Property Owner Impacts: Timely SNW enforcement protects docks, riprap, and shorelines, preventing erosion and sediment/nutrient runoff that degrade water quality. Delayed activation or higher thresholds increase the risk of property damage and costly repairs. Conservative SNW thresholds help preserve both environmental and community assets. 9 VI. Environmental Impacts of Raising the SNW Elevation Raising the SNW elevation above 945.0 feet could have ecological consequences: 1. Shoreline Erosion Risks o Higher water levels can destabilize shorelines and aquatic habitats. o Vegetation critical for sediment stabilization may be submerged, increasing erosion and sedimentation. 2. Aquatic Habitat and Water Quality Effects o Submerged aquatic plants may die, reducing oxygen levels and disrupting fish and invertebrate habitats. o Loss of vegetation decreases natural filtration, potentially degrading water quality. 3. Sediment Resuspension and Phosphorus Loading o Disturbance of lakebed sediments can release phosphorus, fueling algal blooms and eutrophication. o Water clarity may decrease, and nutrient cycling may shift, affecting overall lake ecology. While raising the SNW elevation could extend recreational opportunities, it introduces long-term risks to shoreline stability and aquatic ecosystem health. Alternative measures like shoreline restoration, riparian buffers, and stormwater management may mitigate impacts while maintaining some recreational flexibility. VII. Recreational Impacts SNW restrictions affect boating activities like wakeboarding, tubing, and water skiing. Targeted restrictions preserve partial recreational use while minimizing erosion and property damage. Adaptive management approaches—seasonal or temporary adjustments—can balance recreational access with environmental protection. 10 VIII. Resident Outreach City staff conducted an outreach campaign to gather input on the existing slow-no wake elevation for Lake Minnewashta. Efforts included hosting a public open house to share background information and collect feedback, and distributing an online survey targeted to lakeshore property owners to better understand resident perspectives and experiences. To ensure broad community awareness, staff implemented a communications campaign through the City’s website, social media platforms, and mailed notices to affected residents. The information gathered through these engagement efforts will help inform City Council’s consideration of whether adjustments to the current SNW elevation are warranted. The survey data is still in review, but the general feedback is split evenly between residents who desire to raise the triggering elevation or remove the SNW restriction entirely and those who believe the SNW elevation is set correctly or is too high already. Some residents, especially those in low lying areas, observed erosion and shoreline damage on their properties exacerbated by wave action during periods of high-water levels. The Lake Minnewashta Preservation Alliance (LMPA) conducted their own private survey of its members. The survey results mimicked the city’s in that responses were evenly split between those who supported the current SNW elevation and those who desired it to be raised or eliminated entirely. IX. Regulatory and Legal Framework Minnesota’s SNW ordinance process ensures transparency and compliance: 1. Prepare a Water Surface Use Management (WSUM) worksheet and map. 2. Draft a necessity statement explaining reasons for changes. 3. Draft ordinance language specifying boundaries, triggers, enforcement, and penalties. 4. Conduct a public hearing for community input. 5. Submit materials to the DNR for a 120-day review. Approval from the DNR is required before formal adoption. This structured process balances local interests, statewide standards, and environmental protection. 11 X. Options for Council Consideration • Maintain current SNW elevation: Status quo; balanced protection. • Lower the elevation: More frequent restrictions, stronger shoreline protection. • Raise the elevation: Fewer restrictions, greater recreational access, increased environmental risk. • Adaptive management: o Reduce the number of consecutive days a lake is lower than the threshold from 3 days to 1 day. o Temporary or seasonal adjustments with periodic review. o Targeted permanent SNW areas in critical areas o Targe ted approach on boats that cause the most wake such as wake boats o Increase boating distances from shore to allow wave dissipation XI. Conclusion and Next Steps Lake Minnewashta’s current SNW elevation reflects a balance between recreational use, property protection, and ecological stewardship. Adjusting the threshold involves tradeoffs: greater access versus potential environmental impacts. Recommended next steps include: • Analysis of resident feedback from surveys and open house • Analysis of potential ecological and property impacts with a focus of environmentally sensitive areas • Additional analysis of water level data • Interagency coordination with DNR and watershed authorities XII. Appendices • Historical lake level data • Maps of shoreline vulnerability – In progress • Comparison of SNW thresholds on nearby lakes – In progress 12 • Sample ordinance language – In progress 13 Historical lake level data 14 City Council Item October 13, 2025 Item Fire Department Staffing Discussion File No.Item No: A.2 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Andrew Heger, Fire Chief Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION This will be a continuation of the presentation that was made in May of this year. This topic is an informational presentation only to engage council in discussion staffing and service delivery needs. No formal action is necessary by the council. Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Operational Excellence SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION 15 ATTACHMENTS 16 City Council Item October 13, 2025 Item Future Work Session Schedule File No.Item No: A.3 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY The City Council is tentatively scheduled to hold the following work sessions: October 28, 2025 Presentation of Capital Fund Budgets and 2025-2029 CIP Lake Ann Park Preserve Trail Update November 18, 2025 Presentation of Preliminary 2025 Utility Fund Budgets and 2025-2029 Utility Fund CIP November 25, 2025 Final Review of Proposed 2025 Levy, Budgets, and CIP for all funds Hwy 41 and Lake Lucy LRIP grant application December 15, 2025 City Council Roundtable 17 Pending items: Sign Code updates Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center planning workshops Elections Pleasantview Road project BACKGROUND Staff or the City Council may suggest topics for work sessions. Dates are tentative until the meeting agenda is published. Work sessions are typically held at 5:30 p.m. in conjunction with the regular City Council meeting, but may be scheduled for other times as needed. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 18 City Council Item October 13, 2025 Item Approve City Council Meeting Minutes dated September 22, 2025 File No.Item No: D.1 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Jenny Potter, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the City Council Meeting minutes dated September 22, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Chanhassen City Council approve the City Council Meeting minutes dated September 22, 2025. 19 ATTACHMENTS City Council Meeting Minutes dated September 22, 2025 20 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 22, 2025 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilmember McDonald, Councilmember Schubert, Councilmember von Oven, and Councilmember Kimber. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Eric Maass, Community Development Director; Charlie Howley, Rachel Jeske, Planner; and Jenny Potter, City Clerk. PUBLIC PRESENT: Dr. Erin Rathke Kerry Zajicek, 1601 Lyman Boulevard Deena Laugen PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: 1. Congratulations on Civic Campus Phase 1 Completion, and welcome to the new Council Chambers Mayor Ryan welcomed everyone to the new Civic Campus and expressed excitement for the new space. 2. District 112 Referendum – Dr. Erin Rathke, Superintendent of District 112 Schools Mayor Ryan introduced Dr. Erin Rathke. Dr. Erin Rathke congratulated the city on their new location. She reviewed the financial reality and noted that the funding has not kept pace with inflation. She explained the student-centered spending and noted that instruction and instructional support were essential. She commented that the 10-year levy proposal was to increase the general education revenue by $742 per pupil, subject to an annual increase at the rate of inflation. This would equate to $23 per month for a $500,000 value home. She provided examples that would happen if the operating levy were approved, including an enhanced gifted and talented program, enhanced advanced academics at the middle level, and additional counseling support at the high school. She stated that if the operating levy was not approved, the district would need to cut $6.5 million over four years to maintain an eight percent fund balance. She said that there was a website with a live calculator that could give residents an idea of their direct costs. She explained the tax impact distribution 21 City Council Minutes – September 22, 2025 2 and noted that the tax impact historically decreases over time. She said that the vote was on or before November 4, 2025. Dr. Rathke said that they were doing investments at elementary, middle, and high school, and her other presentation provides additional depth to these changes. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilmember McDonald moved, Councilmember Kimber seconded that the City Council approve the following consent agenda items 1 through 14 pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Special Work Session Minutes dated September 4, 2025 2. Approve City Council Meeting Minutes dated September 8, 2025 3. Approve City Council Work Session Minutes dated September 8, 2025 4. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated September 2, 2025 5. Receive Environmental Commission Minutes dated July 9, 2025 6. Approve Claims Paid dated September 22, 2025 7. Minnesota Valley Operation Round Up Grant Award 8. Firefighting Personal Protective Equipment Donation 9. Approve Civic Campus Splashpad Purchase with Commercial Recreation Specialist, Inc. 10. Approve Entering Into Agreements with Construction Manager for Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 11. Resolution 2025-63: Accepting Donation from Level 7 Development, LLC 12. Resolution 2025-64: Authorize Condemnation of Land Associated with the Southerly Extension of Laredo Drive 13. Resolution 2025-65: Accept $528.01 Donation from Chaska Community Hockey Association for Community Day Sponsorship 14. Resolution 2025-66: Authorize Design and Construction Administration Services Contract for the 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance and the Red Cedar Point Drainage Improvement Projects All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. 22 City Council Minutes – September 22, 2025 3 VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. 1. Kerry Zajicek Citizen Action Request Kerry Zajicek, 1601 Lyman Boulevard, thanked the City Council for the opportunity to speak. He said they bought their five-acre property in 2022 and moved in during 2023. He said that it came with a detached shed, and they hoped to build an outdoor sports court, but the city said no. He said there were not many appropriate places to build a sports court based on a detached structure, driveway, and property line. He asked if he could construct a detached structure that was 1500 feet to allow the indoor sports court to have a three-point line. He explained that the detached structure would take a smaller footprint than the current outbuilding and an outdoor sports court. FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATES. None. PUBLIC HEARINGS. None. GENERAL BUSINESS. 1. Approve Site Plan for a Memory Care Facility at 1620 Arboretum Boulevard (#25-10) Rachel Jeske, Planner, reviewed the development location for the proposed memory care facility. She summarized the definition and the standards for a continuing care facility. She provided an overview of the site plan architecture, landscaping, utilities, and grading and drainage. She explained that the wetland delineation was approved in May 2025 and noted that the Planning Commission approved allowing them to build in the wetland setback. She said that the Water Resources Department recommended an enhanced buffer reestablishment plan. Councilmember von Oven clarified that the max roof height was 35 feet. Ms. Jeske confirmed this information. Mayor Ryan asked about the wetland setback. Ms. Jeske explained that it would be more of a benefit for the buffer to be established, even though the building would be in the setback. Mayor Ryan said that they would reestablish the buffer, and she asked if the wetland was in poor condition. Ms. Jeske answered that the wetland and the creek were in poor condition. She said she was unsure of the specifics, but that the Water Resources Department would work with the applicant, and the applicant would have to do maintenance. Mayor Ryan discussed the potential impact on the park. Ms. Jeske answered that a majority of the tree removal was on the western side and the eastern corner. She said that most trees would be saved, so it was unlikely that there would be major changes to Lake Ann Park. The applicant is also adding an improved landscape buffer. 23 City Council Minutes – September 22, 2025 4 Eric Maass, Community Development Director, clarified that the only impacts would be on private property and not on Lake Ann Park Property. Deena Laugen, a representative for the developer, explained that the goal of Eden Springs was to make the continuing care facility feel like a home. She stated that there were profound benefits to a boutique community. She described the plan to replant the landscape buffer for the wetland. She expressed excitement to be a part of Chanhassen. Councilmember McDonald confirmed that they would have memory care. He asked if they would have different stages, such as assisted living, memory care, and hospice. Ms. Laugen answered that those different options would be available, and there would be security in place for memory care. Councilmember McDonald asked if they were accepting Medicaid payments. Ms. Laugen answered that they would be making cash payments currently. Councilmember McDonald asked if they could transition to Medicaid payments. Ms. Laugen answered that at the current time, they were set up for cash payments but were looking for additional options. Councilmember McDonald asked what would happen if people ran out of money to pay for the living scenario. Ms. Laugen responded that they were considering additional payment options, such as forming a non-profit with different scholarship opportunities. She said they were looking at different ways to serve the residents. Councilmember McDonald said that a lot of older residents would need an option like this, but did not have the finances in place. He hoped that Chanhassen could be for the rich and the poor. Councilmember von Oven moved, Councilmember McDonald seconded that the Chanhassen City Council approves the requested site plan for the 42-bed Eden Springs Assisted Living and Memory care facility, subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. 2. Approve Final Plat for Avienda Apartments (Planning Case 25-08) Eric Maass, Community Development Director, reviewed the final plat for the Avienda Apartments. He stated that the final plat had the necessary drainage and utility easements and provided easement areas for public utilities. He said that the approval recommendation was contingent on approval of a Development Contract between the Developer and the city. He said 24 City Council Minutes – September 22, 2025 5 that a proposed grocer would like to see a land purchase for the apartment project before accepting a lease. Councilmember Schubert moved, Councilmember Kimber seconded that the Chanhassen City Council approves the Avienda Apartments final plat as proposed and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. 3. Resolution 25-67: Support for Suburban Transit Providers Councilmember Kimber expressed the importance of maintaining a strong and resilient transit system. He reaffirmed the crucial role of Suburban Transit Providers, such as SW Transit. He said that it was important for Chanhassen and other communities to be served by suburban transit providers, and they need to have a strong voice in the future. Councilmember McDonald expressed the value of SW Transit and noted that residents could travel to many different locations using the services. He commented that Metro Transit could not support the location well. He said if SW Transit were eliminated, it would leave a large void for residents, especially those who could not afford a vehicle. He stated that the taxpayer dollar goes a long way for SW Transit services. Mayor Ryan said that it was a strong plea, and the city felt strongly about SW Transit. She asked if there was something residents should be aware of at the legislature that caused the resolution. Councilmember McDonald answered that there was a constant battle with transit in the cities. Chanhassen got out of the Metro Transit through special legislation to form its own transit companies. He said that they struggle to get the funding from the Metropolitan Council. He said it was important that the cities send a clear message that others cannot touch the opt-outs. He stated that if they lost the charter, it would create a void in Chanhassen, and Metro Transit could not handle the increased volume. Councilmember Kimber moved, Councilmember McDonald seconded that the Chanhassen City Council adopt Resolution 25-XX: Support for Suburban Transit Providers and direct staff to share with local legislators. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. None. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. 1. Correspondence Letter 25 City Council Minutes – September 22, 2025 6 Councilmember Kimber moved, Councilmember Schubert seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 8:13 p.m. Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen City Manager Prepared by Jenny Potter City Clerk 26 City Council Item October 13, 2025 Item Approve City Council Work Session Minutes dated September 22, 2025. File No.Item No: D.2 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Jenny Potter, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the City Council Work Session Minutes dated September 22, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Chanhassen City Council approve the City Council Work Session minutes dated September 22, 2025. 27 ATTACHMENTS City Council Work Session minutes dated September 22, 2025 28 1 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES September 22, 2025 Mayor Ryan called the work session to order at 5:30 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilmember McDonald, Councilmember von Oven, Councilmember Kimber, Councilmember Schubert COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager; Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Eric Maas, Planning Director; Patrick Gavin, Communications Manager; Jenny Potter, City Clerk; Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director; Jamie Marsh, Environmental Specialist; Andrew Hegar, Fire Chief PUBLIC PRESENT: Heritage Tree Ordinance Discussion Jamie Marsh, Environmental Specialist, gave an overview of a proposed Heritage Tree Ordinance. Ms. Marsh presented a draft ordinance that would define Heritage Trees as deciduous trees at least 25 inches in diameter and coniferous trees at least 30 feet tall, and outlined potential regulations for their preservation, removal, and replacement. The City Council directed staff to narrow their focus at this time on heritage tree protections related to subdivision developments rather than individual private properties. The goal would be to craft recommendations that would modify existing regulations that require developers to account for large, mature trees during new subdivision projects, including increased replacement requirements when heritage trees are removed. This approach will allow the city to balance preservation efforts with growth and development, while deferring any broader regulations for existing private lots. The Council referred the matter to the Planning Commission. Market Blvd Improvement Project Update Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer presented an updated layout for the Market Boulevard Improvements and provided details on the project schedule and budget. The City Council did not reach consensus on how best to move forward. Members weighed the competing goals of easing traffic flow, improving pedestrian safety, and leveraging TIF funding, but several noted that the timing may not be right for a major project. With ongoing construction already affecting downtown, some council members expressed concern that residents may be weary of roadwork and that it could be better to revisit a larger reconstruction when traffic impacts from future downtown development are clearer. The City Council opted against pursuing a full-scale overhaul of Market Boulevard at this time and instead directed staff to plan 29 City Council Work Session Minutes – September 22, 2025 2 a more modest set of improvements. The upgrades would focus on adding an enhanced pedestrian/bicycle path on the east side, repaving the street, traffic signal replacement at 78th Street and Market Boulevard, extending street repaving north of 78th Street (including Chan View), and making improvements at the railroad crossing. Accessory Structure Ordinance Discussion Eric Maas, Planning Director, talked about a resident request to construct an additional agricultural building on actively farmed land, which highlighted limitations in the current code that caps total accessory structure space on residential properties at 1,000 square feet. Staff has researched how comparable cities regulate accessory building size and prepared draft ordinance language that would exempt agricultural properties zoned A2 from the square footage maximum while still requiring compliance with setbacks and lot coverage standards. Mr. Maass recommended that if a broader amendment is pursued, the standard should not be based on a percentage of the principal structure’s gross floor area or the lot area. Instead, a specific total square footage limit should be maintained. After reviewing staff’s findings and draft language, the City Council agreed to move the proposed amendment forward in the process. The draft ordinance will now be sent to the Planning Commission for review. Mayor Ryan recessed the work session at 6:46 P.M. Mayor Ryan reconvened the work session at 8:20 P.M. Permitted Burns Ordinance Discussion Andrew Hegar, Fire Chief, gave an overview of the current ordinance on permitted burns. Under existing code, burn permits are allowed only on rural properties—generally interpreted as those south of Lyman Boulevard—and require applicants to meet strict conditions, such as maintaining distance from buildings and showing no practical disposal alternatives. Chief Heger stated that while only a small number of permits are issued each year, both permitted and unpermitted burns have led to challenging incidents that strain fire department resources and raise resident concerns about smoke and safety. City Council feedback was sought on whether to clarify eligible properties for permits or to eliminate permitted burns altogether, except when managed by a DNR-approved contractor. During the discussion, the City Council directed Chief Heger to draft updated ordinance language that would give the city flexibility to be more restrictive on permitted burns when necessary, while still allowing permits in cases that meet clear safety thresholds and receive fire department approval. 30 City Council Work Session Minutes – September 22, 2025 3 Mayor Ryan adjourned the work session at 9:12 P.M. Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen City Manager Prepared by Jenny Potter City Clerk 31 City Council Item October 13, 2025 Item Approve City Council Special Work Session Minutes dated September 29, 2025 File No.Item No: D.3 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Jenny Potter, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the City Council Special Work Session Minutes dated September 29, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Chanhassen City Council approve the City Council Special Work Session minutes dated September 29, 2025. 32 ATTACHMENTS City Council Special Work Session minutes dated September 29, 2025 33 1 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES September 29, 2025 Mayor Ryan called the work session to order at 11:30 a.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilmember von Oven, Councilmember Kimber, Councilmember McDonald, Councilmember Schubert COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager; Jerry Ruegemer, Parks Director; Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director; Eric Maass, Community Development Director; Jodi Sarles, Recreation Center Manager; Priya Wall, Recreation Manager; Patrick Gavin, Communications Manager; Jenny Potter, City Clerk PUBLIC PRESENT: Jim Arnold, Sports Facilities Companies (SFC); Kevin Schuh, Sports Facilities Companies; Ryan Ferguson, Sports Facilities Companies; Mike Healy, BKV; and other representatives from BKV, and SFC. Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center Representatives from SFC and BKV gave an overview of the projected performance and management of the proposed Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center. Jim Arnold, Sports Facilities Companies, described their process of blending local market research, participation data and comparisons to similar facilities nationwide. Their analysis was built around three main goals: creating a true community asset that enhances quality of life, ensuring programs and amenities are accessible to residents of all ages and developing a financially sustainable model that limits the need for ongoing city subsidy. SFC’s predict that the Community Center will likely run at a loss for the first few years of operation but by the third year it is projected to break even and then in following years will make money. Over time, revenue growth from memberships, ice and court rentals, food and beverage, and community events is expected to outpace expenses, allowing the center to operate sustainably. The City Council considered the question of management. SFC outlined the advantages of outsourcing daily operations to a professional firm, including cost savings, staff training and support, liability coverage, and access to national event booking networks. Under this approach, employees would be hired and managed by SFC but would serve the community as Chanhassen Community Center staff, with the city retaining final authority over budgets, policies and programming decisions. 34 Special City Council Work Session Minutes – September 29, 2025 2 Mayor Ryan adjourned the work session at 1:05 p.m. Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen City Manager Prepared by Jenny Potter City Clerk 35 City Council Item October 13, 2025 Item Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated September 16, 2025 File No.Item No: D.4 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Amy Weidman, Senior Admin Support Specialist Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council receives the Planning Commission minutes dated September 16, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 36 Planning Commission Minutes dated September 16, 2025 37 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 16, 2025 CALL TO ORDER: Chair Noyes called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Eric Noyes, Jeremy Rosengren, Ryan Soller, Mike Olmstead, Dave Grover, and Katie Trevena. MEMBERS ABSENT: Vice Chair Steve Jobe STAFF PRESENT: Rachel Arsenault, Associate Planner; Eric Maass, Community Development Director; Joe Seidl, Waters Resource Engineer; and Mackenze Grunig, Project Engineer. PUBLIC PRESENT: John Dragseth 6480 Oriole Rena Dragseth 2600 Forest Gary Bridge 2449 W 64th Street Josh McKinney Measure Group PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. MINNEWASHTA APARTMENTS REZONING AND SITE PLAN REVIEW (PLANNING CASE 25-11) Eric Maass, Community Development Director, reviewed the communications to date for the site plan. He said the public hearing was sent and published in the newspaper as required. Mr. Maass reviewed the land use designation and the zoning districts allowed within that designation; permitted zoning includes a variety of zoning adjacent to the site. He stated that the city had some level of discretion when considering the rezoning request. He said that the present zoning is single-family residential. He stated that any development of the property would require that it be rezoned so that the zoning designation was consistent with the future land use designation within the city’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. He commented that the requested zoning was R-8, which is an eligible district. There are a number of different land uses in the vicinity, and R-8 is compatible with adjacent land uses. He stated that the project, as proposed, is compatible with the R-8 land ordinance. He said that the proposed project is residential in nature; there are 44 units proposed for this project. The adjacent intersection is planned for a roundabout project to be constructed in 2028. He commented that the city has planned for the density of the utilities. He stated that the staff was supportive of the rezoning request. 38 Planning Commission Minutes – September 16, 2025 2 Rachel Arsenault, Associate Planner, said that the city is limited in approving or denying the proposed site plan request based on whether the proposed site plan meets the standards for the zoning ordinance. She said it was a quasi-judicial decision, and she reviewed the nine standards for the site plan. She stated the building location met all the required setbacks. She said that they proposed 44 required spaces on the surface lots in front of the building, but the proposal includes 88 parking spaces in total. She discussed the temporary trail along Highway 41 until the roundabout construction was complete. There are existing trees on the west side of the property to be preserved. She said that they were proposing to plant sixteen trees. Mrs. Arsenault commented that there might be additional buffering required based on the City Council review. She stated that they proposed eight light posts on the property. The stormwater facilities are to be located to the west, and there was a drainage easement that the city could access after the construction of the roundabout. She discussed access for the project. She commented on the site plan renderings and the architectural elevations. The staff reviewed the building height and the building materials. Mackenze Grunig, Project Engineer, discussed the utility tie-in and fire hydrant relocation. He proceeded to discuss traffic, providing information on the planned roundabout project, the conditioned temporary traffic signal, and trips during peak hours. He spoke about the drainage and utility easement the city will receive, as well as the stormwater facilities the developer is proposing to treat additional city water runoff from the roundabout project. He reviewed the construction schedule for 2026 to 2027. Joe Seidl, Water Resource Engineer, discussed the drainage. He reviewed the existing condition and said there was minimal impervious surface with no existing stormwater facilities. He said that the stormwater flows from east to west, and there is one wetland located on the southwestern portion of the site. He said there was a mix of stormwater in the area of the town, including Trunk Highway 41, and private stormwater facilities connected to the city’s system. He said that the development must meet design requirements for both the city and the watershed district. Mr. Seidl looked more broadly at the area, which was built up in the 1980s and 1990s. He said there was limited existing stormwater treatment. He said that there is a stormwater need for this specific development, the roundabout, and future city stormwater needs that are not currently planned. He said that the proposed pond is oversized for treating stormwater. He said that there was an opportunity for stormwater management, such as a regional stormwater facility. He commented that it was an oversized and centralized area to manage stormwater. It was built to take water from other impervious areas, and it would be a partnership between the city and the developer. The developer would build the pond, and the city would help maintain the stormwater pond. He discussed the stormwater prevention plan and stated that the proposed design maintained the water flow patterns. He said that they were looking to see if the roundabout could utilize some of the system being built. He commented that the Project Engineer was looking for ways to enhance the design, such as lowering the elevation where the basin was constructed. He said that if the facilities were built at a lower elevation, it would allow more flexibility. He commented that they wanted to work with the applicant regarding the stormwater. Mrs. Arsenault stated that after reviewing the site plan criteria as designed by the City Code, it would meet the conditions of approval. 39 Planning Commission Minutes – September 16, 2025 3 Mr. Maass reviewed the summary of the rezoning and site plan requests and stated that the staff recommends the approval of both requests. Josh McKinney, Measure Group, said he wanted to highlight a couple of items. He stated that the site is currently zoned as residential single-family, but rezoning is necessary. He said they were looking at a specific project type, but they would be challenged with the sanitary sewer for the location. He said that absent a lift station, the service area was limited. Mr. McKinney said that they were incorporating a significant interstate construction on Highway 41. He said that they wanted as seamless an installation as possible of the roundabout. Mr. McKinney recognized that the product type would adhere to the maximum building height threshold of 35 feet and would locate the building as far as possible from existing structures. He stated that the site had a lot of typography, so the location of the building would be critical. He commented that they were looking at the home-to-home spacing equivalent to a football field. He said that the building is the 35-foot maximum height, but the actual elevation relative to Highway 41 was only five feet taller than Trouvaille, since the building is proposed at the bottom of the hill. He commented that the roundabout function would be improved in the future, so they were trying to optimize the conditions for 2028. He said they were constructing one full leg of the roundabout, and this would assist with the roundabout construction costs. They were trying to provide service for the project and taking on costs that they could bear. They were taking the leg of the roundabout and the stormwater. He discussed that they reviewed the traffic and the roundabout size. He stated that it was a three-story building that would offer amenities for the residents. He commented that they will use high-quality materials for the project. Chair Noyes asked about the traffic and its effect on existing performance. He said that there was a perception that the existing performance is not great for the way it was set up now. Mr. Grunig answered that the current intersection performance was graded at an F. He said that roundabouts were the safest intersection control. Chair Noyes asked about what was dictating the roundabout construction. He asked if there was any way to change the roundabout construction. Mr. Grunig said that Trunk Highway 5 was scheduled for 2026 and 2027. He stated that Highway 41 (Hazeltine Boulevard) is a detour route for additional traffic construction, so they could not construct the roundabout until 2028. Chair Noyes asked if the detour off Trunk Highway 5 changed the analysis. Mr. Grunig answered that the detour was considered as a part of the analysis. Commissioner Olmstead asked about the probability of the temporary signal, as it is a MnDOT decision. Mr. Grunig said it is yet to be final, but the criteria are met to support the installation. Commissioner Trevena discussed current conditions during peak times on the road, specifically with Middle School traffic. She also expressed concern for the safety of the residents and pedestrians. 40 Planning Commission Minutes – September 16, 2025 4 Chair Noyes mentioned that several residents talked about document access. He asked if that had been resolved. Mr. Maass answered that it has been resolved, and if residents have any trouble accessing documents, they can directly reach out to staff for copies. Commissioner Trevena asked about construction in 2028. Staff responded. Commissioner Olmstead asked about where the stormwater system would go from private to public. Mr. Seidl responded to determining the location of what was public and private based on the stormwater. He discussed the stormwater system. Commissioner Grover asked about traveling through the intersection during the roundabout construction. Mr. Grunig replied that there are standard techniques to use to move traffic through roundabout construction. Commissioner Soller asked about the context of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. He said that this lot seems like an outlier, especially butting up to the adjacent properties. He asked if there was context for this lot, when the rest of the neighborhood was residential, single-family, and public/semi-public. He thought it seemed like a strange piece of land, and he asked why it was guided this way in the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Maass answered that the site was likely guided for medium-density residential due to its proximity to adjacent commercial and institutional properties, as well as adjacency to another medium-density residential development. Commissioner Soller said that, as he was looking at the Highway 41 corridor, he said this looked like the last piece of land where the current zoning was not aligned with the land use guidance in the Comprehensive Plan. He asked for confirmation. Mr. Maass answered that he believed so and that he was not aware of any property that was zoned outside of its guidance other than this property. Commissioner Soller stated that this would be the last development in forested space in this area. He said that this was the final stamp of development in this area. Mr. Maass stated that it was a fair assessment. He said that it was five acres, but much of the acreage was not proposed to be used. Commissioner Trevena stated that the proposal seems mindful of neighbors but asked for more information regarding the additional buffering. Mrs. Arsenault responded that they highlighted areas in purple where there could be additional buffering, and that the Planning Commission could condition a recommendation to include specific buffering requirements in those areas. She said they could have city staff review the specific buffering in the areas. Chair Noyes opened the public hearing. John Dragseth, 6480 Oriole, shared his belief that the Planning Commission should recommend the denial of the application. He said that the 2040 Plan did not say that R-8 was okay, but that R-8, R-4, and R-2 were okay. He said that the staff decided that R-8 was okay, but the Planning Commission and City Council must decide what is the correct zoning. He said that the developer 41 Planning Commission Minutes – September 16, 2025 5 doesn’t have the right to R-8. He said that a lot has happened with traffic in the last month, but there was no resolution. He stated that nobody did a traffic study, and in its previous submission, the city staff said the proposal warrants a complete traffic study. He commented that they did not do a traffic study. He said that they heard new things tonight that were not in the proposal. He discussed the intersection, which was important for cars. He said that Herman Field Park crossing is north of the intersection, so traffic would back up through the pedestrian crossing. He discussed concerns about cars passing and not being aware of kids crossing. He said he did not see the regional pond in the application, but he did see it on pages 10 and 11 of the report. He stated that the report took the pond from 4 acres and added almost 8 acres. He said the pond needed to triple in size, but that they could not vote on the finding and fact that the water would be okay. He stated that the city was trying to please a developer with whom they had worked in the past, and that it did not match the neighborhood. He recommended denial. Gary Bridge, 2449 W 64th Street, said he could not find anywhere where a single-family residential neighborhood is located near an apartment complex of this size. He said that they were discussing building an apartment building in a single-family residential oasis. He commented that there is a discrepancy between how it is zoned and what was in the plan. He said the Avienda apartments have been recommended for approval, so he struggled to see the need for the apartment because of the unique property on which it sits. He said that the lot for the apartment sits above the elevation of the neighborhood, so it would be the beacon on the hill for six months of the year. He commented that there would be a significant impact on the traffic. He thought it was ridiculous to have apartment buildings next to homes of such value. Chair Noyes closed the public hearing. Commissioner Trevena asked for further clarification about the traffic signal and what would happen with the crosswalk. She said that there was a significant issue since there were many cars that assumed people were turning onto Chaska Road. She asked if there are any plans near the crosswalk. Mr. Grunig said that the temporary signal would be timed with the intersection of Trunk Highway 7. He said that they were trying to keep traffic flowing southbound freely. Commissioner Rosengren asked what the foot traffic is like, if children are walking along Highway 41, and where they were going. Commissioner Trevena responded that students met their parents at businesses off Chaska Road. They would cross to get to the other side, since the pickup takes about half an hour, so they would meet elsewhere. She said there were students crossing Highway 41 to avoid the long pick-up time. Commissioner Rosengren asked about the traffic studies. He said that the community had figured out a workaround for the traffic situation. He stated that adding a temporary stoplight would not solve the problem. Mr. Grunig answered that a substantial amount of information had been communicated to the middle school. He discussed cars turning right to help with the traffic. He stated that there are a lot of workarounds being used to help with pick-up, including surrounding neighborhood parking. He said that the city was staying within its scope of influence. Commissioner Rosengren said that people would skirt the rules put in place, and there is potential for an accident. 42 Planning Commission Minutes – September 16, 2025 6 Chair Noyes discussed the creation of the roundabout and the requirement for the temporary traffic signal because of the construction. He asked if there was an order that needed to happen. Mr. Grunig discussed the restoration of Trunk Highway 5. He stated that they recommended a traffic signal regardless of the roundabout because of the Trunk Highway 5 project detouring traffic onto Highway 41. Chair Noyes said that they would still have traffic issues at the site. Commissioner Soller asked about the traffic light. Mr. Grunig responded that during the construction with the improvements, the traffic signal alone would reduce the queue wait time for cars leaving the middle school. Commissioner Soller asked about striping at the intersection and how that changed where pedestrians cross Highway 41. Mr. Grunig answered that striping would occur with engineering standards for the intersection. Commissioner Soller asked about opportunities to add a pedestrian-controlled crossing. Mr. Gruning said that his understanding was that there was an opportunity to have a pedestrian crossing at the intersection. Commissioner Soller said that this seemed like an unsafe area, despite what they did with the project. He asked about the net impact on traffic and safety with the proposed project timeline. He asked if that was in the purview of the Planning Commission. He said that there were specific requirements to be met. Chair Noyes said that the traffic situation was bad, but it was almost two independent things that were going to happen. He said that the roundabout had nothing to do with the apartment complex and would not be built until MnDOT said it could be built. He said that their job was to make a decision based on what was in front of them, not if they thought there was a better use for the property. Commissioner Soller said that the approval was contingent on a temporary light. Mr. Maass confirmed this information. Commissioner Soller asked if they could make it contingent on a light and if they could also make it contingent on the roundabout development. Mr. Maass stated that the roundabout was originally planned for construction this summer, but there was a funding shortfall, and the City Engineer secured funding extensions for construction in 2028. Mr. Maass discussed the roundabout construction. He said that the Highway 5 project needs to be completed first, so the roundabout could not be constructed until 2028. Commissioner Rosengren discussed foot traffic on Highway 41. He said that there are no lights there. Mr. Grunig answered that the roundabout would have four pedestrian crossings and provided details about the crossings. 43 Planning Commission Minutes – September 16, 2025 7 Commissioner Rosengren asked if there was an ability to add signals for pedestrians on the roundabout. Mr. Grunig answered that there was a flashing system that could be utilized. Chair Noyes discussed the additional buffering and pedestrian sight lines. Commissioner Olmstead discussed the assurances from the developer and stated that he liked the idea that the stormwater would be improved. Commissioner Soller discussed the zoning for the Bluff Creek Boulevard Pioneer Trail project. He asked if it was rezoned to R-4 or R-8. Mr. Maass clarified that he referred to Pioneer Ridge, which was rezoned to R-8 and another type. Commissioner Soller said that a decision was made regarding buffering on that project. Mr. Maass answered that there are detached townhomes only in a certain area of that development in order to be more similar to the adjacent single-family homes. Commissioner Soller asked if they had any R-8. Mr. Maass answered that it was the attached townhomes near Pioneer Trail. Commissioner Soller asked about the status of the Pioneer Ridge project. Mr. Maass responded that it had received all entitlements. Chair Noyes asked about specific language regarding the additional buffering with the Minnewashta Apartment. Mr. Maass answered that the areas in purple would have additional buffering requirements for the site. Commissioner Trevena discussed buffering and supported the addition. Commissioner Rosengren discussed that it seemed like an unnecessary burden to add all of these projects at similar times. He stated he did not understand why it needed to happen at the same time, and if the development needed to happen at the same time. Commissioner Trevena said she agreed with the staff report and that the staff pulled everything together well. She said the timing was challenging, and she did not know if they approved of it, but they could incorporate a signal and a crosswalk before they moved forward. Commissioner Olmstead asked about Oriole Avenue and if it would ever extend further south. Mr. Maass answered that it was a platted public right-of-way, but the current development proposal does not show the utilization of that additional right-of-way. Commissioner Soller discussed the discretion of the Planning Commission. He said that they determined that R-8 was appropriate zoning for this property. He commented that in his role, the approval seemed appropriate, but if he were in a different role, he might have different opinions. 44 Planning Commission Minutes – September 16, 2025 8 Chair Noyes said that the intersection would not improve if they denied the Planning Case. He stated that there were a lot of moving parts. Commissioner Trevena asked if there was an opportunity to address the crosswalk. Mr. Grunig said that any change would have to be approved by MnDOT since it was their right-of-way. Commissioner Soller asked if they had to put in additional language for the contingencies. Mr. Maass answered that it was noted by staff, but if they wanted it to be abundantly clear, they could put it in the motion. Mr. Maass stated that the agenda item would go to the City Council on October 13. Commissioner Olmstead moved, Commissioner Grover seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission motions to recommend approval of the proposed rezoning ordinance and site plan review, subject to the conditions of approval, and adopt the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. The motion carried with a vote of 4 to 2. Commissioner Trevena and Commissioner Rosengren voted nay. GENERAL BUSINESS: None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED SEPTEMBER 2, 2025 Commissioner Trevena moved, Commissioner Rosengren seconded to approve the Chanhassen Planning Commission summary minutes dated September 2, 2025, as presented. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6-0. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS: None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ORDAINED DISCUSSION Mr. Maass discussed the possible amendments to the ordinance related to accessory structures at the work session meeting on September 22. A public hearing on a proposed ordinance amendment could be held on the October 7 Planning Commission meeting. Chair Noyes asked for the definition of an agricultural property and if there was a minimum or maximum size. Mr. Maass answered that the minimum size is ten acres, and it must be zoned as agriculture, and the use is agriculture for an agriculture building exemption. Commissioner Rosengren asked about how many properties applied. Mr. Maass answered that he could think of two off the top of his head. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION: 45 Planning Commission Minutes – September 16, 2025 9 Mr. Maass stated that the HVAC is not yet fully operational, so he apologized for the heat in the building. Commissioner Soller asked about the acoustics of the room. He stated it felt like there were a lot of echoes, and it was difficult to hear people. Mr. Maass answered that he knew there was work left to be done in the room, but he did not know the specifics. Chair Noyes suggested a sign to encourage speakers to consider the proximity to the microphone. OPEN DISCUSSION: None. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Rosengren moved, Commissioner Soller seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:57 p.m. Submitted by Eric Maass Community Development Director 46 City Council Item October 13, 2025 Item Approve Claims Paid dated October 13, 2025 File No.Item No: D.5 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Danielle Washburn, Assistant Finance Director Reviewed By Kelly Grinnell SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council Approves Claims Paid dated October 13, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Financial Sustainability SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION The following claims are submitted for review and approval on October 13, 2025: Total Claims $6,010,871.87 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION 47 ATTACHMENTS Payment Summary Payment Detail 48 Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ANDREW & MEGHAN HAASE 09/17/2025 0.00 98.49 ANDREW SCOTT & HEATHER RUDNICKI 09/17/2025 0.00 51.26 BOLD TITLE 09/17/2025 0.00 50.39 BURNET TITLE 09/17/2025 0.00 106.94 C & J REAL ESTATE II 09/17/2025 0.00 73.46 CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT 09/17/2025 0.00 840.59 CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT 09/17/2025 0.00 96.38 Carver County Abstract & Title 09/17/2025 0.00 50.96 CenturyLink 09/17/2025 0.00 64.00 Derrick Bilderbeek & Dyan Padgett 09/17/2025 0.00 249.84 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP LLC 09/17/2025 0.00 79.53 EDINA REALTY TITLE 09/17/2025 0.00 174.03 ESQUIRE TITLE SERVICES 09/17/2025 0.00 15.30 Executive Title Services 09/17/2025 0.00 81.55 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 09/17/2025 0.00 7.24 FLEX TITLE COMPANY LLC 09/17/2025 0.00 63.42 JAMES & BONITA CATON 09/17/2025 0.00 81.86 JUSTIN & NATALIE NICHOLAS 09/17/2025 0.00 51.10 MARC B. LUBKER & STEPHEN ADAMS 09/17/2025 0.00 46.53 Marco Inc 09/17/2025 0.00 275.00 MINNETONKA TITLE 09/17/2025 0.00 100.89 MINNETONKA TITLE 09/17/2025 0.00 84.27 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 09/17/2025 0.00 21,274.00 MNDNR Region 3 Fisheries Office 09/17/2025 0.00 135.00 Nokomis Energy, LLC 09/17/2025 0.00 10,122.22 THE TITLE GROUP INC 09/17/2025 0.00 47.64 Title Mark LLC 09/17/2025 0.00 19.59 Title Mark LLC 09/17/2025 0.00 29.00 Toby Bishop 09/17/2025 0.00 101.54 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 09/17/2025 0.00 28.78 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 09/17/2025 0.00 75.49 Watermark Title Agency 09/17/2025 0.00 9.90 All Energy Solar 09/18/2025 0.00 500.00 ALLIED BLACKTOP 09/18/2025 0.00 177,455.72 ASPEN MILLS 09/18/2025 0.00 143.66 Barr Engineering Company 09/18/2025 0.00 6,998.00 BOLTON & MENK INC 09/18/2025 0.00 51,933.59 CAMPION BARROW & ASSOCIATES 09/18/2025 0.00 465.00 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO 09/18/2025 0.00 587.00 Chad Arlt 09/18/2025 0.00 500.00 Christine Lea Pedretti 09/18/2025 0.00 1,336.40 Christopher Paulson 09/18/2025 0.00 250.00 CNH Architects, Ltd 09/18/2025 0.00 4,464.00 Continua Interiors of Minnesota LLC 09/18/2025 0.00 20,320.90 Page 1 of 5 49 Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC. 09/18/2025 0.00 1,239.69 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 09/18/2025 0.00 177.84 DEM-CON LANDFILL 09/18/2025 0.00 928.53 Edina Heating & Cooling Inc 09/18/2025 0.00 7,985.00 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 09/18/2025 0.00 222.22 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 09/18/2025 0.00 599.94 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 09/18/2025 0.00 2,641.63 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 09/18/2025 0.00 923.40 HealthPartners, Inc. 09/18/2025 0.00 88,190.09 Heritage Shade Tree Consultants, Inc 09/18/2025 0.00 16,462.03 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 09/18/2025 0.00 9,411.97 John Graham 09/18/2025 0.00 150.00 Jon Kamrath Construction 09/18/2025 0.00 500.00 Juli Al-Hilwani 09/18/2025 0.00 600.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 09/18/2025 0.00 70.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 09/18/2025 0.00 115,433.00 Lindstrom Restoration 09/18/2025 0.00 500.00 Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P 09/18/2025 0.00 3,333.33 Macqueen Emergency Group 09/18/2025 0.00 484.30 Mary Froberg 09/18/2025 0.00 250.00 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 09/18/2025 0.00 1,632.16 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 09/18/2025 0.00 241,707.34 MINNESOTA GREEN LANDSCAPING INC 09/18/2025 0.00 500.00 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 09/18/2025 0.00 64.54 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 09/18/2025 0.00 49.28 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 09/18/2025 0.00 51,586.80 NvoicePay 09/18/2025 0.00 780.32 Pedego Electric Bikes Twin Cities 09/18/2025 0.00 900.00 Pinnacle Pest Control 09/18/2025 0.00 1,175.00 POWERPLAN OIB 09/18/2025 0.00 32.94 Premium Waters, Inc 09/18/2025 0.00 4.38 Ryan Contracting Company 09/18/2025 0.00 1,606,874.32 SCOTT NELSON COACHING INC 09/18/2025 0.00 750.00 Senja Inc 09/18/2025 0.00 160.00 SM HENTGES & SONS 09/18/2025 0.00 944,337.45 SMSC Organics Recycling Facility 09/18/2025 0.00 540.32 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 09/18/2025 0.00 9,604.78 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 09/18/2025 0.00 17.74 Tauer Inc 09/18/2025 0.00 250.00 TFORCE FINAL MILE 09/18/2025 0.00 82.08 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 09/18/2025 0.00 1,066.00 Tracey Souvignier 09/18/2025 0.00 37.50 TruGreen Processing Center 09/18/2025 0.00 1,759.00 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 09/18/2025 0.00 1,922.75 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 09/18/2025 0.00 562.34 Wolf River Electric 09/18/2025 0.00 250.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 09/24/2025 0.00 1,223.35 CenturyLink 09/24/2025 0.00 61.79 EMPLOYEE GROUP FUND 09/24/2025 0.00 106.50 Heidi's Freelance Art 09/24/2025 0.00 337.50 Marco Inc 09/24/2025 0.00 735.00 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 09/24/2025 0.00 613.84 NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 09/24/2025 0.00 12,647.29 Page 2 of 5 50 Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Priya Tandon 09/24/2025 0.00 400.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 09/24/2025 0.00 17,910.66 24 Seven Events & Marketing Inc 09/25/2025 0.00 1,800.00 Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 09/25/2025 0.00 641.57 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 09/25/2025 0.00 96.17 ASPEN MILLS 09/25/2025 0.00 1,029.20 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 09/25/2025 0.00 17,210.13 Carver County Parks 09/25/2025 0.00 824.00 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO 09/25/2025 0.00 453.50 College Hunks Hauling Junk & Moving Eden Prairie 09/25/2025 0.00 3,724.44 Earl F Andersen Inc 09/25/2025 0.00 1,238.95 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 09/25/2025 0.00 455.10 FASTENAL COMPANY 09/25/2025 0.00 34.52 Global Equipment Company Inc 09/25/2025 0.00 3,830.10 GONYEA HOMES 09/25/2025 0.00 10,000.00 GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION LLC 09/25/2025 0.00 746.50 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 09/25/2025 0.00 4,600.00 Holton Electric Contractors LLC 09/25/2025 0.00 807.92 Home Depot USA, Inc. 09/25/2025 0.00 120.00 Infosend, Inc 09/25/2025 0.00 3,681.64 Kerry Maus 09/25/2025 0.00 382.50 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 09/25/2025 0.00 10,181.29 LVC Companies Inc 09/25/2025 0.00 1,020.00 Macqueen Emergency Group 09/25/2025 0.00 246.87 Midwest Aqua Care, Inc 09/25/2025 0.00 945.00 North American Safety, Inc. 09/25/2025 0.00 941.96 Nuss Truck & Equipment 09/25/2025 0.00 159,488.22 Ouverson Sewer and Water 09/25/2025 0.00 5,500.00 PATCHIN MESSNER 09/25/2025 0.00 1,000.00 Pella Northland 09/25/2025 0.00 128.70 Pitney Bowes Inc. 09/25/2025 0.00 1,009.00 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 09/25/2025 0.00 2,260.00 Pro-Tree Outdoor Services 09/25/2025 0.00 3,150.00 ROADKILL ANIMAL CONTROL 09/25/2025 0.00 258.00 Sports Facilities Companies LLC 09/25/2025 0.00 30,000.00 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 09/25/2025 0.00 53,162.78 Titan Energy Systems 09/25/2025 0.00 34,536.00 TJ Office Furniture LLC 09/25/2025 0.00 24,400.00 UHL Company Inc 09/25/2025 0.00 1,100.50 Vehicle Response Training LLC 09/25/2025 0.00 2,605.85 WATEROUS COMPANY 09/25/2025 0.00 272.00 WW GRAINGER INC 09/25/2025 0.00 92.46 CENTURYLINK 10/01/2025 0.00 409.66 Doug Ohman 10/01/2025 0.00 350.00 Dylan Lindner 10/01/2025 0.00 65.00 Dylan Lindner 10/01/2025 0.00 85.00 IUOE Local #49 10/01/2025 0.00 665.00 JENNIFER POTTER 10/01/2025 0.00 523.12 Kelly Grinnell 10/01/2025 0.00 129.92 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 10/01/2025 0.00 128.00 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 10/01/2025 0.00 7,698.16 Nokomis Energy, LLC 10/01/2025 0.00 8,171.56 Potentia MN Solar 10/01/2025 0.00 9,967.51 Page 3 of 5 51 Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount VERIZON WIRELESS 10/01/2025 0.00 5,093.50 XCEL ENERGY INC 10/01/2025 0.00 38,084.90 Across The Street Productions 10/02/2025 0.00 485.00 Allegra Print & Imaging 10/02/2025 0.00 101.27 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 10/02/2025 0.00 85.02 American Pressure Inc 10/02/2025 0.00 802.00 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 10/02/2025 0.00 458.74 Amy Herbert 10/02/2025 0.00 150.00 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 10/02/2025 0.00 2,443.52 Architectural Sales of Minnesota Inc 10/02/2025 0.00 133,546.25 ASPEN MILLS 10/02/2025 0.00 596.85 Bauer Built Inc 10/02/2025 0.00 876.58 Boarman Kroos Vogel Group Inc 10/02/2025 0.00 12,026.88 Botanize Inc 10/02/2025 0.00 1,000.00 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 10/02/2025 0.00 405.53 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 10/02/2025 0.00 12,625.50 Carver County Community Development Agency 10/02/2025 0.00 75,000.00 Chappell Central Inc 10/02/2025 0.00 30,424.22 Cheryl Ruby 10/02/2025 0.00 500.00 Cintas Corporation No. 2 10/02/2025 0.00 42.06 City of Bloomington 10/02/2025 0.00 1,328.00 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 10/02/2025 0.00 91.26 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 10/02/2025 0.00 741.20 DAYCO CONCRETE COMPANY 10/02/2025 0.00 23,928.60 Dorsey and Whitney, LLP 10/02/2025 0.00 11,857.00 Ebert Inc 10/02/2025 0.00 37,032.90 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 10/02/2025 0.00 278.07 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 10/02/2025 0.00 4,740.00 Engel Water Testing Inc 10/02/2025 0.00 1,160.00 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 10/02/2025 0.00 483.87 Floors by Beckers, LLC 10/02/2025 0.00 167,904.90 Fobbe Electric Inc 10/02/2025 0.00 5,225.00 GONYEA HOMES 10/02/2025 0.00 10,030.00 Grazzini Brothers & Company 10/02/2025 0.00 24,590.75 GYM WORKS INC 10/02/2025 0.00 512.50 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 10/02/2025 0.00 50.00 Houston Engineering Inc 10/02/2025 0.00 2,379.25 Johnson Fitness & Wellness 10/02/2025 0.00 16,375.00 Juli Al-Hilwani 10/02/2025 0.00 637.50 KELLINGTON CONSTRUCTION 10/02/2025 0.00 376,912.50 Kraus-Anderson Construction Company 10/02/2025 0.00 118,551.40 LAKETOWN ELECTRIC CORPORATION 10/02/2025 0.00 418,342.05 M & M Home Contractors Inc 10/02/2025 0.00 9,900.00 Macqueen Emergency Group 10/02/2025 0.00 12.00 Marco Inc 10/02/2025 0.00 2,184.36 Minnkota Architectural Products Co, Inc 10/02/2025 0.00 116,850.00 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 10/02/2025 0.00 2,001.49 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 10/02/2025 0.00 1,819.34 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 10/02/2025 0.00 253.91 Northern Glass & Glazing Inc 10/02/2025 0.00 175,224.65 Olson Companies, Inc 10/02/2025 0.00 45,372.00 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 10/02/2025 0.00 156.10 POWERPLAN OIB 10/02/2025 0.00 65.88 Page 4 of 5 52 Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 10/02/2025 0.00 1,010.00 Precision Utilities 10/02/2025 0.00 6,558.75 Prime Construction Solutions 10/02/2025 0.00 17,136.67 Ramsey Excavating Company 10/02/2025 0.00 116,367.42 ROTARY CLUB OF CHANHASSEN 10/02/2025 0.00 500.00 SEH 10/02/2025 0.00 1,344.37 Senja Inc 10/02/2025 0.00 230.40 Spectrum Screen Printing Inc 10/02/2025 0.00 1,262.23 Sports Facilities Companies LLC 10/02/2025 0.00 15,000.00 Sun Life Financial 10/02/2025 0.00 3,878.37 Sustainable Investment Group LLC 10/02/2025 0.00 7,056.00 TK Elevator Corporation 10/02/2025 0.00 1,937.02 TWIN CITY HARDWARE 10/02/2025 0.00 82,853.42 Village Green Landscapes 10/02/2025 0.00 500.00 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 10/02/2025 0.00 1,003.72 Report Total:0.00 6,010,871.87 Page 5 of 5 53 AP Check Detail User: dwashburn@chanhassenmn.gov Printed: 10/8/2025 9:23:41 AM Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 24 Seven Events & Marketing Inc 101-1613-4345 1,800.00 9/25/2025 July 3 2026 performance deposit 1,800.00 9/25/2025 24 Seven Events & Marketing Inc 1,800.00 Across The Street Productions 101-1220-4370 485.00 10/2/2025 Nutter Conference Registration 2025 485.00 10/2/2025 Across The Street Productions 485.00 Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 700-0000-4300 320.78 9/25/2025 SCADA generator city hall and pw Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 700-0000-4300 320.79 9/25/2025 SCADA generator city hall and pw 641.57 9/25/2025 Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 641.57 Al-Hilwani Juli 101-1530-4347 300.00 9/18/2025 Personal Training Al-Hilwani Juli 101-1539-4343 300.00 9/18/2025 Pickleball Lessons 600.00 9/18/2025 Al-Hilwani Juli 101-1530-4347 637.50 10/2/2025 Flolid Bode 5 Hebrink 10 637.50 10/2/2025 AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 1 of 41 54 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Al-Hilwani Juli 1,237.50 All Energy Solar 101-0000-2073 250.00 9/18/2025 Erosion escrow 3880 Lone Cedar Ln #417364 All Energy Solar 101-0000-2073 250.00 9/18/2025 Erosion escrow 7520 Chippewa Trl #465007 500.00 9/18/2025 All Energy Solar 500.00 Allegra Print & Imaging 101-1120-4110 101.27 10/2/2025 Trash/Recycling signage for new building 101.27 10/2/2025 Allegra Print & Imaging 101.27 ALLIED BLACKTOP 101-1320-4542 120,505.72 9/18/2025 2025 Sealcoat ALLIED BLACKTOP 420-1310-4710 56,950.00 9/18/2025 2025 Trail Fogseal 177,455.72 9/18/2025 ALLIED BLACKTOP 177,455.72 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 101-0000-2008 85.02 10/2/2025 September premium 85.02 10/2/2025 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 85.02 American Pressure Inc 101-1312-4510 802.00 10/2/2025 pressure washer switch boxes 802.00 10/2/2025 American Pressure Inc 802.00 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 101-1550-4120 374.20 10/2/2025 tires AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 101-1550-4120 84.54 10/2/2025 tire AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 2 of 41 55 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 458.74 10/2/2025 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 458.74 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4110 96.17 9/25/2025 Water Filter 96.17 9/25/2025 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4110 339.66 10/2/2025 Water Filter ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4112 795.00 10/2/2025 Water Block ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4110 83.29 10/2/2025 Water filter ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4112 660.15 10/2/2025 City Hall Coffee ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4112 124.21 10/2/2025 Fire Coffee ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4112 379.03 10/2/2025 PW Coffee Order ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4112 62.18 10/2/2025 Donut Decaf Kcup for Building Dept 2,443.52 10/2/2025 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 2,539.69 Architectural Sales of Minnesota Inc 414-4010-4702 133,546.25 10/2/2025 Pay App #5 Civic Campus 133,546.25 10/2/2025 Architectural Sales of Minnesota Inc 133,546.25 Arlt Chad 101-0000-2073 500.00 9/18/2025 Erosion escrow 1080 Lake Susan Hills Dr #441927 500.00 9/18/2025 Arlt Chad 500.00 ASPEN MILLS 101-1220-4240 143.66 9/18/2025 Duty crew jacket 143.66 9/18/2025 ASPEN MILLS 101-1220-4240 236.35 9/25/2025 Class A uniform alternations and pants ASPEN MILLS 101-1220-4240 792.85 9/25/2025 Class A uniform-Frisbie AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 3 of 41 56 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 1,029.20 9/25/2025 ASPEN MILLS 101-1220-4240 596.85 10/2/2025 New hire uniform 596.85 10/2/2025 ASPEN MILLS 1,769.71 Barr Engineering Company 700-7025-4300 1,996.00 9/18/2025 Well 8 & 11 Rehab Barr Engineering Company 700-7025-4300 5,002.00 9/18/2025 Well 10 & 12 Rehab 6,998.00 9/18/2025 Barr Engineering Company 6,998.00 Bauer Built Inc 101-1320-4140 876.58 10/2/2025 tires 876.58 10/2/2025 Bauer Built Inc 876.58 Bishop Toby 700-0000-2020 0.56 9/17/2025 Refund Check 099504-000, 3850 LONE CEDAR LANE Bishop Toby 701-0000-2020 15.89 9/17/2025 Refund Check 099504-000, 3850 LONE CEDAR LANE Bishop Toby 700-0000-2020 77.16 9/17/2025 Refund Check 099504-000, 3850 LONE CEDAR LANE Bishop Toby 720-0000-2020 7.93 9/17/2025 Refund Check 099504-000, 3850 LONE CEDAR LANE 101.54 9/17/2025 Bishop Toby 101.54 Boarman Kroos Vogel Group Inc 414-4010-4300 12,026.88 10/2/2025 Civic Campus A/E Services 12,026.88 10/2/2025 Boarman Kroos Vogel Group Inc 12,026.88 BOLD TITLE 700-0000-2020 0.94 9/17/2025 Refund Check 099682-000, 7250 SIERRA COURT AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 4 of 41 57 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description BOLD TITLE 720-0000-2020 13.26 9/17/2025 Refund Check 099682-000, 7250 SIERRA COURT BOLD TITLE 701-0000-2020 14.36 9/17/2025 Refund Check 099682-000, 7250 SIERRA COURT BOLD TITLE 700-0000-2020 21.83 9/17/2025 Refund Check 099682-000, 7250 SIERRA COURT 50.39 9/17/2025 BOLD TITLE 50.39 BOLTON & MENK INC 720-6053-4303 11,092.61 9/18/2025 Storm @ 22% BOLTON & MENK INC 700-6053-4303 5,042.10 9/18/2025 Water @ 10% BOLTON & MENK INC 601-6053-4303 30,252.58 9/18/2025 PMP @ 60% BOLTON & MENK INC 701-6053-4303 4,033.67 9/18/2025 Sanitary @ 8% BOLTON & MENK INC 101-1310-4359 1,512.63 9/18/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 51,933.59 9/18/2025 BOLTON & MENK INC 51,933.59 Botanize Inc 101-0000-2073 500.00 10/2/2025 Erosion escrow 7158 Purple Parkway #672305 Botanize Inc 101-0000-2073 500.00 10/2/2025 Erosion escrow 7170 Purple Parkway #672306 1,000.00 10/2/2025 Botanize Inc 1,000.00 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 101-1220-4142 405.53 10/2/2025 Medical supplies-Narcan & airways 405.53 10/2/2025 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 405.53 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 414-4010-4303 4,859.00 10/2/2025 Civic Campus-CMT BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 416-0000-4303 7,766.50 10/2/2025 Chan Bluffs CC -Geotech 12,625.50 10/2/2025 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 12,625.50 AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 5 of 41 58 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 0.11 9/17/2025 Refund Check 020911-000, 7707 VASSERMAN PLACE BURNET TITLE 720-0000-2020 1.52 9/17/2025 Refund Check 020911-000, 7707 VASSERMAN PLACE BURNET TITLE 700-0000-2020 46.47 9/17/2025 Refund Check 020911-000, 7707 VASSERMAN PLACE BURNET TITLE 701-0000-2020 58.84 9/17/2025 Refund Check 020911-000, 7707 VASSERMAN PLACE 106.94 9/17/2025 BURNET TITLE 106.94 C & J REAL ESTATE II 700-0000-2020 1.27 9/17/2025 Refund Check 102262-000, 7925 STONE CREEK DRIVE-130 C & J REAL ESTATE II 700-0000-2020 24.33 9/17/2025 Refund Check 102262-000, 7925 STONE CREEK DRIVE-130 C & J REAL ESTATE II 720-0000-2020 3.46 9/17/2025 Refund Check 102262-000, 7925 STONE CREEK DRIVE-130 C & J REAL ESTATE II 700-0000-2020 2.16 9/17/2025 Refund Check 102262-000, 7925 STONE CREEK DRIVE-130 C & J REAL ESTATE II 701-0000-2020 42.24 9/17/2025 Refund Check 102262-000, 7925 STONE CREEK DRIVE-130 73.46 9/17/2025 C & J REAL ESTATE II 73.46 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 101-0000-2076 230.00 9/25/2025 Pleasant View Pointe city legal fees reimbursable CAMPBELL KNUTSON 101-0000-2076 200.00 9/25/2025 Avienda Rowhomes city legal fees reimbursable CAMPBELL KNUTSON 101-1140-4302 16,780.13 9/25/2025 Legal Fees-August 2025 17,210.13 9/25/2025 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 17,210.13 CAMPION BARROW & ASSOCIATES 101-1220-4352 465.00 9/18/2025 New hire assessment 465.00 9/18/2025 CAMPION BARROW & ASSOCIATES 465.00 CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT 701-0000-2020 2.03 9/17/2025 Refund Check 007376-003, 1000 PARK ROAD-MAIN METER CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT 720-0000-2020 838.56 9/17/2025 Refund Check 007376-003, 1000 PARK ROAD-MAIN METER CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT 700-0000-2020 87.36 9/17/2025 Refund Check 007376-004, 1000 PARK ROAD-SPRINKLER CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT 700-0000-2020 7.75 9/17/2025 Refund Check 007376-004, 1000 PARK ROAD-SPRINKLER CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT 700-0000-2020 1.27 9/17/2025 Refund Check 007376-004, 1000 PARK ROAD-SPRINKLER AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 6 of 41 59 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 936.97 9/17/2025 CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT 936.97 Carver County Abstract & Title 700-0000-2020 1.47 9/17/2025 Refund Check 103742-000, 7647 NICHOLAS WAY Carver County Abstract & Title 701-0000-2020 28.67 9/17/2025 Refund Check 103742-000, 7647 NICHOLAS WAY Carver County Abstract & Title 700-0000-2020 15.46 9/17/2025 Refund Check 103742-000, 7647 NICHOLAS WAY Carver County Abstract & Title 720-0000-2020 5.36 9/17/2025 Refund Check 103742-000, 7647 NICHOLAS WAY 50.96 9/17/2025 Carver County Abstract & Title 50.96 Carver County Community Development Agency 213-0000-4907 75,000.00 10/2/2025 6721 Hopi Road 75,000.00 10/2/2025 Carver County Community Development Agency 75,000.00 Carver County Parks 101-1638-4343 824.00 9/25/2025 Lake Ann Camp archery instruction 824.00 9/25/2025 Carver County Parks 824.00 CATON JAMES & BONITA 701-0000-2020 32.02 9/17/2025 Refund Check 096067-000, 8784 LAKE RILEY DRIVE CATON JAMES & BONITA 720-0000-2020 9.47 9/17/2025 Refund Check 096067-000, 8784 LAKE RILEY DRIVE CATON JAMES & BONITA 700-0000-2020 39.21 9/17/2025 Refund Check 096067-000, 8784 LAKE RILEY DRIVE CATON JAMES & BONITA 700-0000-2020 1.16 9/17/2025 Refund Check 096067-000, 8784 LAKE RILEY DRIVE 81.86 9/17/2025 CATON JAMES & BONITA 81.86 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO 720-7207-4150 587.00 9/18/2025 concrete for stormwater repair AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 7 of 41 60 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 587.00 9/18/2025 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO 701-7025-4751 453.50 9/25/2025 LS#10 concrete for conduit/power disconnect panel 453.50 9/25/2025 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO 1,040.50 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1220-4321 129.43 9/24/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1312-4321 89.85 9/24/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 700-7019-4321 43.29 9/24/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1600-4321 21.91 9/24/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1530-4321 85.28 9/24/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 701-0000-4321 41.91 9/24/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1170-4321 473.50 9/24/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1190-4321 147.18 9/24/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 700-7043-4321 113.46 9/24/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 700-0000-4321 34.25 9/24/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1550-4321 43.29 9/24/2025 Gas Charges 1,223.35 9/24/2025 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 1,223.35 CenturyLink 700-0000-4310 32.00 9/17/2025 Telephone & Communications CenturyLink 701-0000-4310 32.00 9/17/2025 Telephone & Communications 64.00 9/17/2025 CenturyLink 700-7043-4310 61.79 9/24/2025 Telephone & Communications 61.79 9/24/2025 CENTURYLINK 101-1170-4310 159.08 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 101-1540-4310 62.06 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 101-1160-4325 -182.45 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 700-0000-4310 15.57 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 101-1550-4310 30.85 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 700-0000-4310 6.17 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 700-7019-4310 216.43 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 8 of 41 61 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description CENTURYLINK 101-1312-4310 49.36 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 101-1350-4310 30.85 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 701-0000-4310 6.17 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 701-0000-4310 15.57 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges 409.66 10/1/2025 CENTURYLINK 535.45 Chappell Central Inc 414-4010-4702 30,424.22 10/2/2025 Pay App #11 Civic Campus 30,424.22 10/2/2025 Chappell Central Inc 30,424.22 Cintas Corporation No. 2 101-1312-4510 42.06 10/2/2025 first aid kits 42.06 10/2/2025 Cintas Corporation No. 2 42.06 City of Bloomington 720-0000-4323 1,328.00 10/2/2025 Lab Testing Services - Beach monitoring 1,328.00 10/2/2025 City of Bloomington 1,328.00 CNH Architects, Ltd 402-4003-4300 4,464.00 9/18/2025 Fire station space needs analysis 4,464.00 9/18/2025 CNH Architects, Ltd 4,464.00 College Hunks Hauling Junk & Moving Eden Prairie 414-4010-4300 3,724.44 9/25/2025 Moving assistance 3,724.44 9/25/2025 AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 9 of 41 62 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description College Hunks Hauling Junk & Moving Eden Prairie 3,724.44 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 700-0000-2008 75.96 10/2/2025 September premium Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 701-0000-2008 15.30 10/2/2025 September premium 91.26 10/2/2025 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 91.26 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.101-1160-4205 525.20 10/2/2025 O365 Backup Service - Oct COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.101-1160-4205 216.00 10/2/2025 Monthly M365 Licenses 741.20 10/2/2025 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 741.20 Continua Interiors of Minnesota LLC 414-4010-4702 20,320.90 9/18/2025 Furniture 20,320.90 9/18/2025 Continua Interiors of Minnesota LLC 20,320.90 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.101-1120-4110 327.28 9/18/2025 Restroom Supplies DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.101-1120-4110 912.41 9/18/2025 Restroom Supplies 1,239.69 9/18/2025 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC. 1,239.69 DAYCO CONCRETE COMPANY 414-4010-4702 23,928.60 10/2/2025 Pay App #9 Civic Campus 23,928.60 10/2/2025 DAYCO CONCRETE COMPANY 23,928.60 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 101-1370-4260 -21.52 9/18/2025 tools DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 101-1370-4260 99.68 9/18/2025 paint rack AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 10 of 41 63 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 101-1370-4260 99.68 9/18/2025 paint rack 177.84 9/18/2025 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 177.84 DEM-CON LANDFILL 101-1320-4150 928.53 9/18/2025 street sweeping materials 928.53 9/18/2025 DEM-CON LANDFILL 928.53 Dorsey and Whitney, LLP 101-1140-4302 11,857.00 10/2/2025 Legal Fees-Property Acquisition 11,857.00 10/2/2025 Dorsey and Whitney, LLP 11,857.00 Dyan Padgett Derrick Bilderbeek &701-0000-2020 26.64 9/17/2025 Refund Check 017705-000, 6331 SUMMIT CIRCLE Dyan Padgett Derrick Bilderbeek &700-0000-2020 1.06 9/17/2025 Refund Check 017705-000, 6331 SUMMIT CIRCLE Dyan Padgett Derrick Bilderbeek &720-0000-2020 14.93 9/17/2025 Refund Check 017705-000, 6331 SUMMIT CIRCLE Dyan Padgett Derrick Bilderbeek &700-0000-2020 207.21 9/17/2025 Refund Check 017705-000, 6331 SUMMIT CIRCLE 249.84 9/17/2025 Dyan Padgett Derrick Bilderbeek & 249.84 Earl F Andersen Inc 101-1320-4155 1,238.95 9/25/2025 pedestrian signs 1,238.95 9/25/2025 Earl F Andersen Inc 1,238.95 Ebert Inc 414-4010-4702 37,032.90 10/2/2025 Pay App #7 Civic Campus 37,032.90 10/2/2025 AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 11 of 41 64 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Ebert Inc 37,032.90 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 101-1420-4336 40.30 9/25/2025 Public Hearing Notice Minnewashta 2025-11 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 101-1220-4144 414.80 9/25/2025 Ad for Fire Dept Open House 455.10 9/25/2025 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 101-1120-4336 278.07 10/2/2025 Publication of ord 750 278.07 10/2/2025 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 733.17 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP LLC 720-0000-2020 27.04 9/17/2025 Refund Check 104765-000, 8565 ALISA COURT EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP LLC 700-0000-2020 14.46 9/17/2025 Refund Check 104765-000, 8565 ALISA COURT EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP LLC 701-0000-2020 36.11 9/17/2025 Refund Check 104765-000, 8565 ALISA COURT EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP LLC 700-0000-2020 1.92 9/17/2025 Refund Check 104765-000, 8565 ALISA COURT 79.53 9/17/2025 EDGEWATER TITLE GROUP LLC 79.53 Edina Heating & Cooling Inc 700-0000-4510 7,985.00 9/18/2025 Mini Split Installation Lake Susan well house 7,985.00 9/18/2025 Edina Heating & Cooling Inc 7,985.00 EDINA REALTY TITLE 700-0000-2020 86.66 9/17/2025 Refund Check 096467-000, 2323 HARRISON HILL CRT EDINA REALTY TITLE 720-0000-2020 19.81 9/17/2025 Refund Check 096467-000, 2323 HARRISON HILL CRT EDINA REALTY TITLE 700-0000-2020 1.41 9/17/2025 Refund Check 096467-000, 2323 HARRISON HILL CRT EDINA REALTY TITLE 701-0000-2020 66.15 9/17/2025 Refund Check 096467-000, 2323 HARRISON HILL CRT 174.03 9/17/2025 EDINA REALTY TITLE 174.03 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 481-0000-4300 2,172.50 10/2/2025 OSA Reporting - 2024 Reports AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 12 of 41 65 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 482-0000-4300 395.00 10/2/2025 New District - Set up Fee EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 480-0000-4300 2,172.50 10/2/2025 OSA Reporting - 2024 Reports 4,740.00 10/2/2025 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 4,740.00 EMPLOYEE GROUP FUND 101-1110-4372 106.50 9/24/2025 soda for meetings 106.50 9/24/2025 EMPLOYEE GROUP FUND 106.50 Engel Water Testing Inc 700-0000-4300 1,160.00 10/2/2025 water samples 1,160.00 10/2/2025 Engel Water Testing Inc 1,160.00 ESQUIRE TITLE SERVICES 700-0000-2020 4.42 9/17/2025 Refund Check 097309-000, 8949 SOUTHWEST VILLAGE LOOP ESQUIRE TITLE SERVICES 700-0000-2020 0.82 9/17/2025 Refund Check 097309-000, 8949 SOUTHWEST VILLAGE LOOP ESQUIRE TITLE SERVICES 701-0000-2020 7.84 9/17/2025 Refund Check 097309-000, 8949 SOUTHWEST VILLAGE LOOP ESQUIRE TITLE SERVICES 720-0000-2020 2.22 9/17/2025 Refund Check 097309-000, 8949 SOUTHWEST VILLAGE LOOP 15.30 9/17/2025 ESQUIRE TITLE SERVICES 15.30 Executive Title Services 701-0000-2020 37.81 9/17/2025 Refund Check 019000-000, 2331 FAWN HILL COURT Executive Title Services 700-0000-2020 31.61 9/17/2025 Refund Check 019000-000, 2331 FAWN HILL COURT Executive Title Services 700-0000-2020 0.80 9/17/2025 Refund Check 019000-000, 2331 FAWN HILL COURT Executive Title Services 720-0000-2020 11.33 9/17/2025 Refund Check 019000-000, 2331 FAWN HILL COURT 81.55 9/17/2025 Executive Title Services 81.55 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 101-1370-4170 222.22 9/18/2025 DEF fluid AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 13 of 41 66 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 222.22 9/18/2025 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 101-1220-4120 208.87 10/2/2025 batteries FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 700-0000-4140 252.78 10/2/2025 batteries FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 700-0000-4140 22.22 10/2/2025 batteries 483.87 10/2/2025 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 706.09 FASTENAL COMPANY 701-0000-4551 34.52 9/25/2025 Lift station 29 supplies 34.52 9/25/2025 FASTENAL COMPANY 34.52 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 101-1170-4510 599.94 9/18/2025 drinking fountain filters 599.94 9/18/2025 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 599.94 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4550 2,097.06 9/18/2025 gate valve supplies Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4550 544.57 9/18/2025 curb box supplies 2,641.63 9/18/2025 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 2,641.63 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 700-0000-2020 3.40 9/17/2025 Refund Check 104020-000, 722 MAGGIE WAY FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 701-0000-2020 3.08 9/17/2025 Refund Check 104020-000, 722 MAGGIE WAY FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 700-0000-2020 0.16 9/17/2025 Refund Check 104020-000, 722 MAGGIE WAY FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 720-0000-2020 0.60 9/17/2025 Refund Check 104020-000, 722 MAGGIE WAY 7.24 9/17/2025 AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 14 of 41 67 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 7.24 FLEX TITLE COMPANY LLC 700-0000-2020 1.47 9/17/2025 Refund Check 100189-000, 7838 HARVEST LANE FLEX TITLE COMPANY LLC 720-0000-2020 1.79 9/17/2025 Refund Check 100189-000, 7838 HARVEST LANE FLEX TITLE COMPANY LLC 700-0000-2020 18.13 9/17/2025 Refund Check 100189-000, 7838 HARVEST LANE FLEX TITLE COMPANY LLC 701-0000-2020 42.03 9/17/2025 Refund Check 100189-000, 7838 HARVEST LANE 63.42 9/17/2025 FLEX TITLE COMPANY LLC 63.42 Floors by Beckers, LLC 414-4010-4702 167,904.90 10/2/2025 Pay App #2 Civic Campus 167,904.90 10/2/2025 Floors by Beckers, LLC 167,904.90 Fobbe Electric Inc 414-4010-4702 5,225.00 10/2/2025 Pay App #4 Civic Campus 5,225.00 10/2/2025 Fobbe Electric Inc 5,225.00 Froberg Mary 101-0000-2073 250.00 9/18/2025 Erosion escrow 2240 Melody Hill Rd #415289 250.00 9/18/2025 Froberg Mary 250.00 Global Equipment Company Inc 700-0000-4120 1,300.00 9/25/2025 storage racks Global Equipment Company Inc 720-7207-4150 1,230.10 9/25/2025 storage racks Global Equipment Company Inc 101-1370-4120 1,300.00 9/25/2025 storage racks 3,830.10 9/25/2025 Global Equipment Company Inc 3,830.10 AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 15 of 41 68 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description GONYEA HOMES 101-0000-2072 2,500.00 9/25/2025 As Built escrow 9431 Eagle Ridge Way #586855 GONYEA HOMES 101-0000-2072 2,500.00 9/25/2025 As Built escrow 9351 Eagle Ridge #605071 GONYEA HOMES 101-0000-2072 2,500.00 9/25/2025 As Built escrow 9495 Eagle Ridge Rd #632714 GONYEA HOMES 101-0000-2072 2,500.00 9/25/2025 As Built escrow 9367 Eagle Ridge Way #595435 10,000.00 9/25/2025 GONYEA HOMES 101-0000-2073 3,530.00 10/2/2025 Erosion escrow 1824 Lucy Ridge Cir #613812 GONYEA HOMES 101-0000-2073 2,900.00 10/2/2025 Erosion escrow 1910 Della Dr #602119 GONYEA HOMES 101-0000-2073 3,600.00 10/2/2025 Erosion escrow 1934 Della Dr #617670 10,030.00 10/2/2025 GONYEA HOMES 20,030.00 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 700-0000-4300 461.70 9/18/2025 Utility locates GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 701-0000-4300 461.70 9/18/2025 Utility locates 923.40 9/18/2025 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 923.40 Graham John 101-1425-4906 150.00 9/18/2025 Tree Rebate- 2 trees 6935 Highover Dr. 150.00 9/18/2025 Graham John 150.00 Grazzini Brothers & Company 414-4010-4702 24,590.75 10/2/2025 Pay App #7 Civic Campus 24,590.75 10/2/2025 Grazzini Brothers & Company 24,590.75 GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION LLC 101-1540-4130 343.19 9/25/2025 Lake Ann Concessions - Beverage Delivery GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION LLC 101-1540-4130 403.31 9/25/2025 Lake Ann Concessions - Beverage Restock 746.50 9/25/2025 AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 16 of 41 69 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION LLC 746.50 Grinnell Kelly 101-1130-4381 129.92 10/1/2025 Mileage to/from Arrowwood for MNGFOA Conference 129.92 10/1/2025 Grinnell Kelly 129.92 GYM WORKS INC 101-1530-4530 512.50 10/2/2025 Fitness equipment repair 512.50 10/2/2025 GYM WORKS INC 512.50 HAASE ANDREW & MEGHAN 700-0000-2020 28.99 9/17/2025 Refund Check 096422-000, 7602 GREAT PLAINS BLVD HAASE ANDREW & MEGHAN 701-0000-2020 38.57 9/17/2025 Refund Check 096422-000, 7602 GREAT PLAINS BLVD HAASE ANDREW & MEGHAN 720-0000-2020 28.88 9/17/2025 Refund Check 096422-000, 7602 GREAT PLAINS BLVD HAASE ANDREW & MEGHAN 700-0000-2020 2.05 9/17/2025 Refund Check 096422-000, 7602 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 98.49 9/17/2025 HAASE ANDREW & MEGHAN 98.49 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7043-4160 50.00 10/2/2025 1 ton chlorine cylinders 50.00 10/2/2025 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 50.00 HealthPartners, Inc.720-0000-2012 1,297.56 9/18/2025 Health Insurance-October HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 3,548.82 9/18/2025 Health Insurance-October HealthPartners, Inc.700-0000-2012 6,199.07 9/18/2025 Health Insurance-October HealthPartners, Inc.701-0000-2013 312.37 9/18/2025 Dental Insurance-October HealthPartners, Inc.720-0000-2013 96.08 9/18/2025 Dental Insurance-October HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2013 4,036.26 9/18/2025 Dental Insurance-October HealthPartners, Inc.701-0000-2012 4,317.61 9/18/2025 Health Insurance-October HealthPartners, Inc.700-0000-2013 360.40 9/18/2025 Dental Insurance-October HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 67,829.70 9/18/2025 Health Insurance-October AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 17 of 41 70 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2013 192.22 9/18/2025 Dental Insurance-October 88,190.09 9/18/2025 HealthPartners, Inc. 88,190.09 HEATHER RUDNICKI ANDREW SCOTT &700-0000-2020 16.14 9/17/2025 Refund Check 095278-000, 6591 FOXTAIL COURT HEATHER RUDNICKI ANDREW SCOTT &700-0000-2020 0.97 9/17/2025 Refund Check 095278-000, 6591 FOXTAIL COURT HEATHER RUDNICKI ANDREW SCOTT &701-0000-2020 20.42 9/17/2025 Refund Check 095278-000, 6591 FOXTAIL COURT HEATHER RUDNICKI ANDREW SCOTT &720-0000-2020 13.73 9/17/2025 Refund Check 095278-000, 6591 FOXTAIL COURT 51.26 9/17/2025 HEATHER RUDNICKI ANDREW SCOTT & 51.26 Heidi's Freelance Art 101-1220-4144 337.50 9/24/2025 Open house facepainting services 337.50 9/24/2025 Heidi's Freelance Art 337.50 Herbert Amy 101-1425-4906 150.00 10/2/2025 Tree Rebate- 2 trees 2613 Longacres Dr. 150.00 10/2/2025 Herbert Amy 150.00 Heritage Shade Tree Consultants, Inc 101-1310-4359 243.28 9/18/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 Heritage Shade Tree Consultants, Inc 101-1425-4300 14,593.75 9/18/2025 Planning Department Funding Heritage Shade Tree Consultants, Inc 101-1310-4300 1,625.00 9/18/2025 ENG Projects 16,462.03 9/18/2025 Heritage Shade Tree Consultants, Inc 16,462.03 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 414-4010-4300 4,600.00 9/25/2025 Civic Campus Planning & LA AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 18 of 41 71 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 4,600.00 9/25/2025 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 4,600.00 Holton Electric Contractors LLC 700-7019-4120 807.92 9/25/2025 wired new actuator 807.92 9/25/2025 Holton Electric Contractors LLC 807.92 Home Depot USA, Inc.101-1250-3301 120.00 9/25/2025 Duplicate Permit - 3697 Strawberry Ln 120.00 9/25/2025 Home Depot USA, Inc. 120.00 Houston Engineering Inc 701-7015-4303 1,098.25 10/2/2025 Lift Station #5 Rehab Houston Engineering Inc 400-0000-1155 1,281.00 10/2/2025 Audubon Business Park 2,379.25 10/2/2025 Houston Engineering Inc 2,379.25 Infosend, Inc 701-1130-4330 960.30 9/25/2025 August Postage Infosend, Inc 720-1130-4111 266.91 9/25/2025 August Statements Infosend, Inc 720-1130-4330 960.29 9/25/2025 August Postage Infosend, Inc 700-1130-4111 266.92 9/25/2025 August Statements Infosend, Inc 700-1130-4330 960.30 9/25/2025 August Postage Infosend, Inc 701-1130-4111 266.92 9/25/2025 August Statements 3,681.64 9/25/2025 Infosend, Inc 3,681.64 IUOE Local #49 101-0000-2004 455.00 10/1/2025 Union Dues October 2025 IUOE Local #49 701-0000-2004 62.35 10/1/2025 Union Dues October 2025 IUOE Local #49 700-0000-2004 147.65 10/1/2025 Union Dues October 2025 AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 19 of 41 72 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 665.00 10/1/2025 IUOE Local #49 665.00 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 201-0000-4705 8,722.97 9/18/2025 Two sets of structural firefighting gear. JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 201-0000-4705 689.00 9/18/2025 Two pairs structural firefighting boots 9,411.97 9/18/2025 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 9,411.97 Johnson Fitness & Wellness 402-4125-4706 16,375.00 10/2/2025 Replacement Treadmills 16,375.00 10/2/2025 Johnson Fitness & Wellness 16,375.00 Jon Kamrath Construction 101-0000-2073 500.00 9/18/2025 Erosion escrow 2740 Orchard Ln #458729 500.00 9/18/2025 Jon Kamrath Construction 500.00 KELLINGTON CONSTRUCTION 414-4010-4702 376,912.50 10/2/2025 Pay App #10 Civic Campus 376,912.50 10/2/2025 KELLINGTON CONSTRUCTION 376,912.50 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 601-6057-4303 10,181.29 9/25/2025 Market Blvd 10,181.29 9/25/2025 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 10,181.29 Kraus-Anderson Construction Company 414-4010-4702 118,551.40 10/2/2025 Civic Campus CM services AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 20 of 41 73 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 118,551.40 10/2/2025 Kraus-Anderson Construction Company 118,551.40 LAKETOWN ELECTRIC CORPORATION 414-4010-4702 418,342.05 10/2/2025 Pay App #13 Civic Campus 418,342.05 10/2/2025 LAKETOWN ELECTRIC CORPORATION 418,342.05 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 101-1120-4370 70.00 9/18/2025 ICMA Dinner 70.00 9/18/2025 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 70.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 101-1170-4483 57,200.00 9/18/2025 General liability insurance-10002587 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 101-0000-2017 58,233.00 9/18/2025 Work comp premium-40003072 115,433.00 9/18/2025 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 115,433.00 Lindner Dylan 101-1320-4360 65.00 10/1/2025 CDL driver's license Lindner Dylan 101-1320-4300 85.00 10/1/2025 CDL Medical card 150.00 10/1/2025 Lindner Dylan 150.00 Lindstrom Restoration 101-0000-2073 500.00 9/18/2025 Erosion escrow 8080 Stone Creek Dr #427167 500.00 9/18/2025 Lindstrom Restoration 500.00 AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 21 of 41 74 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P 101-1110-4312 3,333.33 9/18/2025 Lobbying expenses-September 3,333.33 9/18/2025 Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P 3,333.33 LVC Companies Inc 101-1170-4229 1,020.00 9/25/2025 Annual Cellular Monitoring-Fire Alarm & UL Cert 1,020.00 9/25/2025 LVC Companies Inc 1,020.00 M & M Home Contractors Inc 101-0000-2073 9,900.00 10/2/2025 Erosion escrow 9900 Deerbrook Dr #612348 9,900.00 10/2/2025 M & M Home Contractors Inc 9,900.00 Macqueen Emergency Group 201-0000-4705 484.30 9/18/2025 Single gas CO monitors for medical bags 484.30 9/18/2025 Macqueen Emergency Group 201-0000-4705 246.87 9/25/2025 Single gas CO monitor 246.87 9/25/2025 Macqueen Emergency Group 101-1220-4530 12.00 10/2/2025 Shipping for SCBA repair 12.00 10/2/2025 Macqueen Emergency Group 743.17 Marco Inc 101-1160-4300 275.00 9/17/2025 Copier Moving Services 275.00 9/17/2025 Marco Inc 101-1160-4411 735.00 9/24/2025 Copier Lease AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 22 of 41 75 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 735.00 9/24/2025 Marco Inc 701-0000-4410 111.00 10/2/2025 Copier Lease Marco Inc 700-0000-4410 111.00 10/2/2025 Copier Lease Marco Inc 101-1170-4410 832.50 10/2/2025 Copier Lease Marco Inc 720-0000-4410 55.50 10/2/2025 Copier Lease Marco Inc 101-1170-4410 1,074.36 10/2/2025 Copier Lease 2,184.36 10/2/2025 Marco Inc 3,194.36 Maus Kerry 101-1539-4343 382.50 9/25/2025 Line Dance Class 382.50 9/25/2025 Maus Kerry 382.50 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4510 31.98 9/18/2025 Bait Station LED 60W 4pk MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4151 25.58 9/18/2025 PVC Cap Pipe Joint MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4260 6.25 9/18/2025 File 3 Pack MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 700-0000-4150 46.95 9/18/2025 Coupling Cable Tie Notebook MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1320-4150 19.98 9/18/2025 Paint Pen MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1320-4260 103.93 9/18/2025 Hygiene Kit Chain Loop Hand Tool MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4150 38.97 9/18/2025 Concrete Mix Fast Set MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1370-4150 31.74 9/18/2025 Painters Tape MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 720-7207-4150 28.71 9/18/2025 Eyebolt Fasteners MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 701-0000-4551 8.99 9/18/2025 Batteries 2pk MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1638-4130 64.95 9/18/2025 Charcl Briq Matchlt MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 700-7043-4150 10.37 9/18/2025 Rubber Tarp Strap MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4120 244.27 9/18/2025 Rope Clip Earmuff Wasp & Hornet Killer Broom MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1220-4142 949.50 9/18/2025 Oil Asorbent 40qt MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 700-0000-4510 19.99 9/18/2025 Paintbrush 1,632.16 9/18/2025 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 1,632.16 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 701-0000-4509 241,707.34 9/18/2025 Wastewater services-October AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 23 of 41 76 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 241,707.34 9/18/2025 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 241,707.34 Midwest Aqua Care, Inc 101-1550-4300 945.00 9/25/2025 Beach weed treatments (Round House) 945.00 9/25/2025 Midwest Aqua Care, Inc 945.00 MINNESOTA GREEN LANDSCAPING INC 101-0000-2073 500.00 9/18/2025 Erosion escrow 1885 Della Dr #698363 500.00 9/18/2025 MINNESOTA GREEN LANDSCAPING INC 500.00 MINNETONKA TITLE 701-0000-2020 38.26 9/17/2025 Refund Check 102840-000, 6360 TETON LANE MINNETONKA TITLE 700-0000-2020 2.03 9/17/2025 Refund Check 102840-000, 6360 TETON LANE MINNETONKA TITLE 720-0000-2020 28.66 9/17/2025 Refund Check 102840-000, 6360 TETON LANE MINNETONKA TITLE 700-0000-2020 15.32 9/17/2025 Refund Check 102840-000, 6360 TETON LANE MINNETONKA TITLE 700-0000-2020 18.17 9/17/2025 Refund Check 013135-000, 6450 MINNEWASHTA PKWY MINNETONKA TITLE 720-0000-2020 34.88 9/17/2025 Refund Check 013135-000, 6450 MINNEWASHTA PKWY MINNETONKA TITLE 701-0000-2020 45.37 9/17/2025 Refund Check 013135-000, 6450 MINNEWASHTA PKWY MINNETONKA TITLE 700-0000-2020 2.47 9/17/2025 Refund Check 013135-000, 6450 MINNEWASHTA PKWY 185.16 9/17/2025 MINNETONKA TITLE 185.16 Minnkota Architectural Products Co, Inc 414-4010-4702 116,850.00 10/2/2025 Pay App #6 Civic Campus 116,850.00 10/2/2025 Minnkota Architectural Products Co, Inc 116,850.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 700-0000-4509 21,274.00 9/17/2025 water supply connection fee AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 24 of 41 77 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 21,274.00 9/17/2025 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 21,274.00 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 601-6140-4300 1,501.12 10/2/2025 Material testing/inspection-County @ 75% MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 601-6040-4300 500.37 10/2/2025 Material testing/inspection-City @ 25% 2,001.49 10/2/2025 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 2,001.49 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 101-0000-2037 128.00 10/1/2025 October premium 128.00 10/1/2025 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 128.00 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 281.28 9/24/2025 Electric Charges MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 130.98 9/24/2025 Electric Charges MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 49.01 9/24/2025 Electric Charges MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 152.57 9/24/2025 Electric Charges 613.84 9/24/2025 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 55.46 10/1/2025 Electric Charges MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 6,021.36 10/1/2025 Electric Charges MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 114.65 10/1/2025 Electric Charges MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 47.82 10/1/2025 Electric Charges MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 247.57 10/1/2025 Electric Charges MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1600-4320 74.97 10/1/2025 Electric Charges MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 700-0000-4320 172.19 10/1/2025 Electric Charges MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 701-0000-4320 964.14 10/1/2025 Electric Charges 7,698.16 10/1/2025 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 8,312.00 MNDNR Region 3 Fisheries Office 101-1611-4345 135.00 9/17/2025 FebFest 2026 fishing contest permit fee AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 25 of 41 78 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 135.00 9/17/2025 MNDNR Region 3 Fisheries Office 135.00 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 101-1550-4120 64.54 9/18/2025 mower parts 64.54 9/18/2025 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 101-1550-4530 1,819.34 10/2/2025 mower repair 1,819.34 10/2/2025 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1,883.88 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1550-4120 49.28 9/18/2025 filters 49.28 9/18/2025 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 700-0000-4120 119.00 10/2/2025 backing plate NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1550-4120 134.91 10/2/2025 filters 253.91 10/2/2025 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 303.19 NICHOLAS JUSTIN & NATALIE 700-0000-2020 1.24 9/17/2025 Refund Check 101307-000, 8755 NORTH BAY DRIVE NICHOLAS JUSTIN & NATALIE 720-0000-2020 8.98 9/17/2025 Refund Check 101307-000, 8755 NORTH BAY DRIVE NICHOLAS JUSTIN & NATALIE 700-0000-2020 17.54 9/17/2025 Refund Check 101307-000, 8755 NORTH BAY DRIVE NICHOLAS JUSTIN & NATALIE 701-0000-2020 23.34 9/17/2025 Refund Check 101307-000, 8755 NORTH BAY DRIVE 51.10 9/17/2025 NICHOLAS JUSTIN & NATALIE 51.10 Nokomis Energy, LLC 700-0000-4320 669.94 9/17/2025 Solar Charge Nokomis Energy, LLC 701-0000-4320 102.87 9/17/2025 Solar Charge Nokomis Energy, LLC 700-7043-4320 6,891.31 9/17/2025 Solar Charge Nokomis Energy, LLC 101-1312-4320 822.93 9/17/2025 Solar Charge AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 26 of 41 79 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Nokomis Energy, LLC 700-7019-4320 1,635.17 9/17/2025 Solar Charge 10,122.22 9/17/2025 Nokomis Energy, LLC 700-0000-4320 562.36 10/1/2025 Electric Charges Nokomis Energy, LLC 701-0000-4320 77.80 10/1/2025 Electric Charges Nokomis Energy, LLC 700-7043-4320 5,555.59 10/1/2025 Electric Charges Nokomis Energy, LLC 101-1312-4320 622.37 10/1/2025 Electric Charges Nokomis Energy, LLC 700-7019-4320 1,353.44 10/1/2025 Electric Charges 8,171.56 10/1/2025 Nokomis Energy, LLC 18,293.78 North American Safety, Inc.101-1320-4240 585.96 9/25/2025 glove t-shirts vest North American Safety, Inc.101-1320-4240 356.00 9/25/2025 raincoats and pants 941.96 9/25/2025 North American Safety, Inc. 941.96 Northern Glass & Glazing Inc 414-4010-4702 175,224.65 10/2/2025 Pay App #5 Civic Campus 175,224.65 10/2/2025 Northern Glass & Glazing Inc 175,224.65 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 701-6051-4300 2,063.47 9/18/2025 Sanitary NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 601-6051-4300 37,658.36 9/18/2025 PMP NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 700-6051-4300 5,674.55 9/18/2025 Water NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 720-6051-4300 6,190.42 9/18/2025 Storm 51,586.80 9/18/2025 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 51,586.80 NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 701-0000-4320 4,374.34 9/24/2025 Solar Charge NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 101-1350-4320 169.24 9/24/2025 Solar Charge NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 700-0000-4320 8,103.71 9/24/2025 Solar Charge AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 27 of 41 80 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 12,647.29 9/24/2025 NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 12,647.29 Nuss Truck & Equipment 400-4152-4704 159,488.22 9/25/2025 #103 Mack tandem axle truck 159,488.22 9/25/2025 Nuss Truck & Equipment 159,488.22 NvoicePay 101-1130-4300 780.32 9/18/2025 payment processing-August 780.32 9/18/2025 NvoicePay 780.32 Ohman Doug 101-1560-4343 350.00 10/1/2025 Doug Ohman speaker 350.00 10/1/2025 Ohman Doug 350.00 Olson Companies, Inc 701-4152-4706 8,507.25 10/2/2025 Trench replacement PW south east bays Olson Companies, Inc 720-4152-4706 8,507.25 10/2/2025 Trench replacement PW south east bays Olson Companies, Inc 700-4152-4706 8,507.25 10/2/2025 Trench replacement PW south east bays Olson Companies, Inc 402-4152-4706 19,850.25 10/2/2025 Trench replacement PW south east bays 45,372.00 10/2/2025 Olson Companies, Inc 45,372.00 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 101-1320-4120 39.74 10/2/2025 Glass Weld Urethane Electr82.79ical Tape O'Reilly Automotive Inc 101-1250-4120 81.13 10/2/2025 Cleaner Tack Cloth O'Reilly Automotive Inc 101-1550-4120 35.23 10/2/2025 Oil 156.10 10/2/2025 AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 28 of 41 81 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description O'Reilly Automotive Inc 156.10 Ouverson Sewer and Water 701-0000-4553 5,500.00 9/25/2025 8020 dakota ave side sewer liner 5,500.00 9/25/2025 Ouverson Sewer and Water 5,500.00 PATCHIN MESSNER 101-1310-4303 1,000.00 9/25/2025 Work on Appraisal 1,000.00 9/25/2025 PATCHIN MESSNER 1,000.00 Paulson Christopher 101-0000-2073 250.00 9/18/2025 Erosion escrow 1641 Anthem Place #419345 250.00 9/18/2025 Paulson Christopher 250.00 Pedego Electric Bikes Twin Cities 101-1539-4343 900.00 9/18/2025 9/22 Ebike ride 900.00 9/18/2025 Pedego Electric Bikes Twin Cities 900.00 Pedretti Christine Lea 101-1539-4343 1,336.40 9/18/2025 Fall Sessions-Yoga/Pilates/Fusion 1,336.40 9/18/2025 Pedretti Christine Lea 1,336.40 Pella Northland 101-0000-2033 128.70 9/25/2025 Duplicate Payment - 1450 W Farm Rd 128.70 9/25/2025 AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 29 of 41 82 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Pella Northland 128.70 Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1190-4510 225.00 9/18/2025 pest control Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1170-4510 250.00 9/18/2025 pest control Pinnacle Pest Control 700-7019-4510 125.00 9/18/2025 pest control Pinnacle Pest Control 700-7043-4510 125.00 9/18/2025 pest control Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1312-4510 250.00 9/18/2025 pest control Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1220-4510 200.00 9/18/2025 pest control 1,175.00 9/18/2025 Pinnacle Pest Control 1,175.00 Pitney Bowes Inc.101-1120-4330 1,009.00 9/25/2025 Postage machine move 1,009.00 9/25/2025 Pitney Bowes Inc. 1,009.00 Potentia MN Solar 101-1190-4320 4,321.92 10/1/2025 Electric Charges Potentia MN Solar 101-1170-4320 3,437.23 10/1/2025 Electric Charges Potentia MN Solar 700-0000-4320 2,208.36 10/1/2025 Electric Charges 9,967.51 10/1/2025 Potentia MN Solar 9,967.51 POTTER JENNIFER 101-1110-4372 44.35 10/1/2025 Water and Pop for Council WS POTTER JENNIFER 101-1120-4110 52.21 10/1/2025 Supplies for Ribbon Cutting POTTER JENNIFER 101-1120-4110 49.65 10/1/2025 Supplies for Ribbon Cutting POTTER JENNIFER 101-1120-4110 376.91 10/1/2025 Storage Bins for City Hall 523.12 10/1/2025 POTTER JENNIFER 523.12 POWERPLAN OIB 101-1250-4120 32.94 9/18/2025 paint AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 30 of 41 83 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 32.94 9/18/2025 POWERPLAN OIB 101-1250-4120 65.88 10/2/2025 locker paint 65.88 10/2/2025 POWERPLAN OIB 98.82 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 101-1425-4574 2,260.00 9/25/2025 PR- Prairie Management 2,260.00 9/25/2025 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 101-1425-4574 1,010.00 10/2/2025 PR- Site Management 1,010.00 10/2/2025 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 3,270.00 Precision Utilities 700-0000-4552 6,558.75 10/2/2025 water main break 161 fox hollow dr 6,558.75 10/2/2025 Precision Utilities 6,558.75 Premium Waters, Inc 101-1550-4120 4.38 9/18/2025 Lake Ann Water 4.38 9/18/2025 Premium Waters, Inc 4.38 Prime Construction Solutions 414-4010-4702 17,136.67 10/2/2025 Pay App #1 Civic Campus 17,136.67 10/2/2025 Prime Construction Solutions 17,136.67 Pro-Tree Outdoor Services 101-1550-4572 3,150.00 9/25/2025 Dead ash trees in ROW AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 31 of 41 84 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 3,150.00 9/25/2025 Pro-Tree Outdoor Services 3,150.00 Ramsey Excavating Company 414-4010-4702 116,367.42 10/2/2025 Pay App #13 Civic Campus 116,367.42 10/2/2025 Ramsey Excavating Company 116,367.42 ROADKILL ANIMAL CONTROL 101-1320-4300 258.00 9/25/2025 roadkill animal removal 258.00 9/25/2025 ROADKILL ANIMAL CONTROL 258.00 ROTARY CLUB OF CHANHASSEN 101-1613-4300 500.00 10/2/2025 City sponsor parade registration fee reimbursement 500.00 10/2/2025 ROTARY CLUB OF CHANHASSEN 500.00 Ruby Cheryl 101-1425-4573 500.00 10/2/2025 Check for tree replacement 500.00 10/2/2025 Ruby Cheryl 500.00 Ryan Contracting Company 700-6053-4751 376,492.60 9/18/2025 Water Ryan Contracting Company 701-6053-4751 49,305.00 9/18/2025 Sanitary Ryan Contracting Company 720-6053-4751 318,708.85 9/18/2025 Storm Ryan Contracting Company 601-6053-4751 862,367.87 9/18/2025 PMP 1,606,874.32 9/18/2025 AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 32 of 41 85 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Ryan Contracting Company 1,606,874.32 SCOTT NELSON COACHING INC 101-1220-4370 750.00 9/18/2025 Quarterly leadership coaching session with officers 750.00 9/18/2025 SCOTT NELSON COACHING INC 750.00 SEH 410-4410-4300 1,344.37 10/2/2025 Lake Ann Park Preserve 1,344.37 10/2/2025 SEH 1,344.37 Senja Inc 101-1539-4343 160.00 9/18/2025 Tai Chi Class 160.00 9/18/2025 Senja Inc 101-1539-4343 230.40 10/2/2025 Tai Chi Instruction 230.40 10/2/2025 Senja Inc 390.40 SM HENTGES & SONS 601-6140-4751 630,022.88 9/18/2025 County @ 75% SM HENTGES & SONS 700-6040-4751 104,306.95 9/18/2025 City @ 100% Water SM HENTGES & SONS 601-6040-4751 210,007.62 9/18/2025 City @ 25% 944,337.45 9/18/2025 SM HENTGES & SONS 944,337.45 SMSC Organics Recycling Facility 101-1320-4158 270.16 9/18/2025 sod/dirt from trail project SMSC Organics Recycling Facility 101-1550-4150 270.16 9/18/2025 sod/dirt from trail project 540.32 9/18/2025 AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 33 of 41 86 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description SMSC Organics Recycling Facility 540.32 Souvignier Tracey 101-1600-4130 37.50 9/18/2025 Paddle Board Yoga Class Payment 37.50 9/18/2025 Souvignier Tracey 37.50 Spectrum Screen Printing Inc 101-1250-4240 1,262.23 10/2/2025 Building dept clothing 1,262.23 10/2/2025 Spectrum Screen Printing Inc 1,262.23 Sports Facilities Companies LLC 416-0000-4300 30,000.00 9/25/2025 Development contract 30,000.00 9/25/2025 Sports Facilities Companies LLC 416-0000-4300 15,000.00 10/2/2025 Development Contract 15,000.00 10/2/2025 Sports Facilities Companies LLC 45,000.00 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 601-6058-4303 9,604.78 9/18/2025 MMSW/TH41 9,604.78 9/18/2025 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 601-6058-4303 53,162.78 9/25/2025 TH41/MMSW Rdbt design services 53,162.78 9/25/2025 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 62,767.56 STEPHEN ADAMS MARC B. LUBKER &700-0000-2020 0.76 9/17/2025 Refund Check 103634-000, 3920 LINDEN CIRCLE STEPHEN ADAMS MARC B. LUBKER &720-0000-2020 10.80 9/17/2025 Refund Check 103634-000, 3920 LINDEN CIRCLE STEPHEN ADAMS MARC B. LUBKER &701-0000-2020 21.61 9/17/2025 Refund Check 103634-000, 3920 LINDEN CIRCLE STEPHEN ADAMS MARC B. LUBKER &700-0000-2020 13.36 9/17/2025 Refund Check 103634-000, 3920 LINDEN CIRCLE AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 34 of 41 87 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 46.53 9/17/2025 STEPHEN ADAMS MARC B. LUBKER & 46.53 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 101-1550-4140 -5.64 9/18/2025 valve SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 700-0000-4140 23.38 9/18/2025 oil pan 17.74 9/18/2025 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 17.74 Sun Life Financial 101-0000-2011 8.15 10/2/2025 Life Insurance-October 2025 Sun Life Financial 101-0000-2015 1,341.01 10/2/2025 LTD-October 2025 Sun Life Financial 700-0000-2011 45.08 10/2/2025 Life Insurance-October 2025 Sun Life Financial 720-0000-2015 40.59 10/2/2025 LTD-October 2025 Sun Life Financial 701-0000-2015 56.30 10/2/2025 LTD-October 2025 Sun Life Financial 101-0000-2011 683.35 10/2/2025 Life Insurance-October 2025 Sun Life Financial 720-0000-2011 20.49 10/2/2025 Life Insurance-October 2025 Sun Life Financial 701-0000-2037 175.05 10/2/2025 Life Insurance-October 2025 Sun Life Financial 101-0000-2037 1,213.95 10/2/2025 Life Insurance-October 2025 Sun Life Financial 700-0000-2015 92.47 10/2/2025 LTD-October 2025 Sun Life Financial 701-0000-2011 26.88 10/2/2025 Life Insurance-October 2025 Sun Life Financial 700-0000-2037 175.05 10/2/2025 Life Insurance-October 2025 3,878.37 10/2/2025 Sun Life Financial 3,878.37 Sustainable Investment Group LLC 414-4010-4300 7,056.00 10/2/2025 Civic Campus building commissioning 7,056.00 10/2/2025 Sustainable Investment Group LLC 7,056.00 Tandon Priya 101-0000-1027 400.00 9/24/2025 Halloween Party change 400.00 9/24/2025 AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 35 of 41 88 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Tandon Priya 400.00 Tauer Inc 101-0000-2073 250.00 9/18/2025 Erosion escrow 2040 Oakwood Ridge #443920 250.00 9/18/2025 Tauer Inc 250.00 TFORCE FINAL MILE 414-4010-4300 82.08 9/18/2025 Courier to CK 82.08 9/18/2025 TFORCE FINAL MILE 82.08 THE TITLE GROUP INC 720-0000-2020 6.30 9/17/2025 Refund Check 006011-001, 8807 LAKE RILEY DRIVE THE TITLE GROUP INC 700-0000-2020 0.70 9/17/2025 Refund Check 006011-001, 8807 LAKE RILEY DRIVE THE TITLE GROUP INC 701-0000-2020 26.19 9/17/2025 Refund Check 006011-001, 8807 LAKE RILEY DRIVE THE TITLE GROUP INC 700-0000-2020 14.45 9/17/2025 Refund Check 006011-001, 8807 LAKE RILEY DRIVE 47.64 9/17/2025 THE TITLE GROUP INC 47.64 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 101-1125-4300 216.00 9/18/2025 Planning Commission Minutes 8.12.25 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 101-1125-4300 212.50 9/18/2025 City Council Meeting Minutes 8/25/25 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 101-1125-4300 212.50 9/18/2025 Minutes for Park & Rec Commission TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 101-1125-4300 212.50 9/18/2025 City Council Minutes TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 101-1125-4300 212.50 9/18/2025 Planning commission minutes 1,066.00 9/18/2025 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 1,066.00 Titan Energy Systems 701-7015-4705 34,536.00 9/25/2025 generator lift station 5 34,536.00 9/25/2025 AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 36 of 41 89 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Titan Energy Systems 34,536.00 Title Mark LLC 700-0000-2020 0.57 9/17/2025 Refund Check 019203-000, 7955 STONE CREEK DRIVE-10 Title Mark LLC 701-0000-2020 10.73 9/17/2025 Refund Check 019203-000, 7955 STONE CREEK DRIVE-10 Title Mark LLC 720-0000-2020 1.55 9/17/2025 Refund Check 019203-000, 7955 STONE CREEK DRIVE-10 Title Mark LLC 700-0000-2020 0.55 9/17/2025 Refund Check 019203-000, 7955 STONE CREEK DRIVE-10 Title Mark LLC 700-0000-2020 6.19 9/17/2025 Refund Check 019203-000, 7955 STONE CREEK DRIVE-10 Title Mark LLC 700-0000-2020 7.05 9/17/2025 Refund Check 103883-000, 707 ROCKBURN ROAD Title Mark LLC 700-0000-2020 0.94 9/17/2025 Refund Check 103883-000, 707 ROCKBURN ROAD Title Mark LLC 720-0000-2020 3.39 9/17/2025 Refund Check 103883-000, 707 ROCKBURN ROAD Title Mark LLC 701-0000-2020 17.62 9/17/2025 Refund Check 103883-000, 707 ROCKBURN ROAD 48.59 9/17/2025 Title Mark LLC 48.59 TJ Office Furniture LLC 414-4010-4703 24,400.00 9/25/2025 Delivery and Installation of Pre-Owned Furniture 24,400.00 9/25/2025 TJ Office Furniture LLC 24,400.00 TK Elevator Corporation 414-4010-4702 1,937.02 10/2/2025 Pay App #4 Civic Campus 1,937.02 10/2/2025 TK Elevator Corporation 1,937.02 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 701-0000-2020 13.95 9/17/2025 Refund Check 007083-000, 420 SANTA FE CIRCLE TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 700-0000-2020 3.41 9/17/2025 Refund Check 007083-000, 420 SANTA FE CIRCLE TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 700-0000-2020 0.76 9/17/2025 Refund Check 007083-000, 420 SANTA FE CIRCLE TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 720-0000-2020 10.66 9/17/2025 Refund Check 007083-000, 420 SANTA FE CIRCLE 28.78 9/17/2025 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 28.78 TruGreen Processing Center 101-1550-4300 1,759.00 9/18/2025 weed control AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 37 of 41 90 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 1,759.00 9/18/2025 TruGreen Processing Center 1,759.00 TWIN CITY HARDWARE 414-4010-4702 82,853.42 10/2/2025 Pay App #6 Civic Campus 82,853.42 10/2/2025 TWIN CITY HARDWARE 82,853.42 UHL Company Inc 101-1190-4510 1,100.50 9/25/2025 service condensing unit 1,100.50 9/25/2025 UHL Company Inc 1,100.50 Vehicle Response Training LLC 101-1220-4370 2,605.85 9/25/2025 EV Training 2,605.85 9/25/2025 Vehicle Response Training LLC 2,605.85 VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1320-4310 297.30 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1120-4310 131.83 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1160-4310 115.20 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1110-4310 40.02 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1520-4310 168.06 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1370-4310 101.12 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1170-4310 76.80 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1600-4310 236.80 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges VERIZON WIRELESS 701-0000-4310 351.88 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges VERIZON WIRELESS 700-0000-4310 490.97 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1220-4310 1,345.76 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1250-4310 292.10 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1312-4310 115.20 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1310-4310 248.02 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1540-4310 40.02 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1420-4310 173.62 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 38 of 41 91 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1530-4310 38.40 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges VERIZON WIRELESS 700-0000-4310 95.08 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges VERIZON WIRELESS 701-0000-4310 95.08 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges VERIZON WIRELESS 720-0000-4310 211.28 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1550-4310 428.96 10/1/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges 5,093.50 10/1/2025 VERIZON WIRELESS 5,093.50 Village Green Landscapes 101-0000-2073 500.00 10/2/2025 Erosion escrow 9527 Eagle Ridge Rd #686110 500.00 10/2/2025 Village Green Landscapes 500.00 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 101-1170-4329 459.03 9/18/2025 Garbage service-September Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 700-0000-4329 18.81 9/18/2025 Garbage service-September Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 101-1190-4329 360.59 9/18/2025 Garbage service-September Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 101-1312-4329 150.53 9/18/2025 Garbage service-September Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 101-1220-4329 117.58 9/18/2025 Garbage service-September Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 101-1550-4329 797.40 9/18/2025 Garbage service-September Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 701-0000-4329 18.81 9/18/2025 Garbage service-September 1,922.75 9/18/2025 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 1,922.75 Watermark Title Agency 701-0000-2020 4.19 9/17/2025 Refund Check 013548-000, 3920 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE Watermark Title Agency 720-0000-2020 5.71 9/17/2025 Refund Check 013548-000, 3920 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 701-0000-2020 46.54 9/17/2025 Refund Check 103827-000, 7625 CENTURY COURT WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 720-0000-2020 3.63 9/17/2025 Refund Check 103827-000, 7625 CENTURY COURT WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 700-0000-2020 1.49 9/17/2025 Refund Check 103827-000, 7625 CENTURY COURT WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 700-0000-2020 23.83 9/17/2025 Refund Check 103827-000, 7625 CENTURY COURT 85.39 9/17/2025 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 85.39 AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 39 of 41 92 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description WATEROUS COMPANY 101-1220-4520 272.00 9/25/2025 Foam sensor replacement E1 272.00 9/25/2025 WATEROUS COMPANY 272.00 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 101-1320-4157 183.82 9/18/2025 pothole patching WM MUELLER & SONS INC 700-0000-4150 378.52 9/18/2025 sand and watermain spoils 562.34 9/18/2025 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 101-1320-4157 1,003.72 10/2/2025 water main patch 1,003.72 10/2/2025 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 1,566.06 Wolf River Electric 101-0000-2073 250.00 9/18/2025 Erosion escrow 740 Bighorn Dr #456582 250.00 9/18/2025 Wolf River Electric 250.00 WW GRAINGER INC 700-7019-4120 92.46 9/25/2025 speed control valve 92.46 9/25/2025 WW GRAINGER INC 92.46 XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 3,148.94 9/24/2025 Electricity Charge XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 10,147.68 9/24/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 700-7019-4320 4,614.04 9/24/2025 Electric Charges 17,910.66 9/24/2025 XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1600-4320 17.07 10/1/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 97.51 10/1/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1550-4320 -303.59 10/1/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 94.19 10/1/2025 Electric Charges AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 40 of 41 93 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1312-4320 753.54 10/1/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1220-4320 1,163.28 10/1/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1120-1193 88.69 10/1/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 700-7043-4320 3,897.46 10/1/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1600-4320 4.52 10/1/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1600-4320 392.67 10/1/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1540-4320 1,535.03 10/1/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 24,026.29 10/1/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1170-4320 5,826.83 10/1/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 701-0000-4320 94.19 10/1/2025 Electric Charges XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1190-4320 397.22 10/1/2025 Electric Charges 38,084.90 10/1/2025 XCEL ENERGY INC 55,995.56 6,010,871.87 AP - Check Detail (10/8/2025)Page 41 of 41 94 City Council Item October 13, 2025 Item Approve Temporary Liquor License, Hackamore Brewing to host the SW Chamber of Commerce Gala File No.Item No: D.6 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Jenny Potter, City Clerk Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the request from Hackamore Brewing for a temporary liquor license to host the SW Chamber of Commerce Gala on November 6, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY Hackamore Brewing has applied for a temporary liquor license to sell intoxicating liquor for the SW Chamber of Commerce Gala. The state allows small brewers to apply for a temporary liquor license to sell intoxicating liquor for a period of one to four days. Hackamore is applying for a one-day license. The Gala will be held at Hackamore Brewing, located at 18651 Lake Drive East in Chanhassen, on November 6, 2025. BACKGROUND Hackamore Brewing has applied for a temporary on-sale liquor license. The application is attached. DISCUSSION 95 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the request from Hackamore Brewing for a temporary liquor license for the SW Chamber of Commerce Gala on November 6, 2025. ATTACHMENTS Temporary Liquor License Application Hackamore Certificate of Insuance 96 97 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURER F : INSURER E : INSURER D : INSURER C : INSURER B : INSURER A : NAIC # NAME: CONTACT A/C, No): FAX E-MAILADDRESS: PRODUCER A/C, No, Ext): PHONE INSURED REVISION NUMBER:CERTIFICATE NUMBER:COVERAGES IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. OTHER: Per accident) Ea accident) N / A SUBR WVD ADDL INSD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. PROPERTY DAMAGE BODILY INJURY (Per accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT AUTOS ONLY AUTOSAUTOSONLY NON-OWNED SCHEDULEDOWNED ANY AUTO AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY Y / N WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? Mandatory in NH) DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below If yes, describe under ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE E.L. EACH ACCIDENT EROTH-STATUTEPER LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY) POLICY EXP( MM/DD/YYYY) POLICYEFFPOLICYNUMBERTYPEOFINSURANCELTRINSR DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) EXCESS LIAB UMBRELLA LIAB $EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE OCCUR CLAIMS-MADE DED RETENTION $ PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG GENERAL AGGREGATE PERSONAL & ADV INJURY MED EXP (Any one person) EACH OCCURRENCE DAMAGE TO RENTED $ PREMISES (Ea occurrence) COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY PRO- JECT LOC CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) CANCELLATION AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ACORD 25 (2016/03) 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. CERTIFICATE HOLDER The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD HIRED AUTOS ONLY 3/4/2025 Miller-Hartwig Insurance PO Box 1177 Lakeville MN 55044 Josh Havlik 952-469-5502 952-469-1881 JHavlik@millerhartwig.com Cincinnati Insurance Co 10677 HACKBRE-01 SFM Mutual Insurance Co11347HackamoreBrewingCoLLC 18651 Lake Dr E Chanhassen MN 55317 407121252 A X 1,000,000 X 500,000 5,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 X Y Y ETD 0658673 7/1/2024 7/1/2025 2,000,000 A 1,000,000 X X ETD 0658673 7/1/2024 7/1/2025 A X X 4,000,000YETD06586737/1/2024Y 7/1/2025 B X189468.201 2/1/2025 2/1/2026 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 A Liquor Liability ETD 0658673 7/1/2024 7/1/2025 occ/agg 1000000/2000000 Brewery and Taproom-18651 Lake Dr E Chanhassen MN 55317 Liquor Liability is continuous until cancelled meaning notice will be given for any cancellation,non-renewal,failure to pick up a renewal,or any other policy interruption.Liquor liability coverage is not location specific and covers any patios and off-premises events provided a valid liquor license is in-force.Additional Insured status,waiver,and primary non-contributory language are extended by endorsement "as required by written contract or agreement"to specified relationships.Forms are available upon request. City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen 55317 98 City Council Item October 13, 2025 Item Approve Encroachment Agreement for 8465 Mission Hills Lane File No.Item No: D.7 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the Encroachment Agreement for 8465 Mission Hills Lane to allow for the installation of a fence." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY A Conservation Easement was recorded against the property at 8465 Mission Hills Lane as part of the original subdivision approval. The easement encumbers the entirety of the property’s rear yard and was established to protect existing vegetation and natural features. BACKGROUND The conservation easement, as written, prohibits any structures—including fences—within its boundaries unless specifically authorized by the City. Unlike the city’s current standard conservation easement language, this easement does not include a defined procedure for amendment. As a result, staff is recommending allowing the fence through an Encroachment Agreement, rather than attempting to amend the easement itself. The property owner has requested approval to install a fence within the conservation easement area to 99 provide for reasonable residential use of their backyard. The proposed fence installation will not require the removal of any trees or disturbance of existing vegetation. Therefore, the request is consistent with the spirit and intent of the conservation easement, which is to preserve the natural character of the area. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Encroachment Agreement to allow construction of a fence within the conservation easement area. The agreement will be drafted by the City Attorney and recorded against the property. The property owner will be responsible for all costs associated with the installation and any future removal or restoration required within the easement area. ATTACHMENTS 8465 MISSION HILLS LN Marsh Glen Plat 100 101 102 103 City Council Item October 13, 2025 Item Approve Encroachment Agreement at 6609 Horeshoe Curv File No.Item No: D.8 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Stacy Osen, Administrative Support Specialist Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the encroachment agreement for property located at 6609 Horseshoe Curv." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY The property owner at 6609 Horsehoe Curv proposes to install a heated driveway and parking pad. A portion of the heating system is proposed to be located within the city's right-of-way, as well as the public drainage and utility easement located on the property. The attached agreement authorizes the property owner to place these private improvements within the public right-of-way and public drainage and utility easement, but removes all future liability of the city related to any potential future damage, maintenance or replacement of the system. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET 104 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the encroachment agreement as presented. ATTACHMENTS 6609 Horseshoe Curv -EA 10.13.25 105 (reserued for recqdins infumatirm) ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this _ day of 2025, by and between the CITY Of CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and BRIAN T. BRI,INER AND ELISE R. BRUNER, AS THE TRUSTEES OF THE RESTATEMENT OF' BRIAN T. BRI.INf,R TRUST AGREEMENT AND ELISE R. BRTTNER AT{D BRIAN T. BRI.INER T. BRI.II\ER, AS THE TRUSTEE OF' THE ELISE R. BRTINER TRUST AGREEMENT ("Owners"). 1. BACKGROTIND. Owners are the fee owner of certain real property located in the City of Chanhassen, County of Carver, State of Minnesota, legally described as follows: Parcel ID No. 250550010 Lot l, Block 1, Alicia Heights, Carver County, Minnesota. Torrens Propeny (Certificate of Title No. $5a8.0) having a street address of 6609 Horseshoe Curve, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 ("Subject Properly"). The City owns easements for right of way and drainage and utility purposes over portions of the Subject Property ("Easement Areas"). Owners desire to install a radiant heat system within the driveway and construct a parking pad on the Subject Property which encroaches on the Easement Areas as depicted on the attached Exhibit "A" ("Improvements"). 106 2. ENCROACHMENT AUTHORIZATION. The City hereby approves the encroachment in its Easement Areas on the Subject Property for the Improvements. Further conditions of encroachment approval are as follows o The Owners shall file for an Encroachment Agreement with the City for any encroachments within public drainage and utilib/ easements. o The City shall have no responsibility to maintain the Improvements located in the Easement Areas. . Owners must maintain the Improvements located on the Subject Property. o Owners are fully responsible and liable for any and all damage caused to the Improvements because of their location in the Easement Areas . Further, Owners agree that the radiant heat system and parking pad shall be constructed consistent with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 3. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNITY. In consideration of being allowed to encroach in the Easement Areas, Owners, for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to indemnifu and hold the City harmless from any damage caused to the Subject Property, including the radiant heat system and parking pad and removal of radiant heat system and parking pad in the Easement Areas, caused in whole or in part by the encroachment into the Easement Areas. 4. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. The City may terminate this Agreement at any time if it is reasonably necessary for the City to occupy the Easement Areas for right of way and/or drainage or utility purposes and the radiant heat system and parking pad are inconsistent with the City's use of the easement. Prior to termination, the City will give the then owner of the Subject Property thirty (30) days advance written notice, except that no notice period will be required in the case of an emergency condition as determined solely by the City and this Agreement may then be terminated immediately. The then owner of Subject Property shall remove that portion of the radiant heat system or parking pad to the extent it impacts the Easement Areas to 107 the effective date of the termination of this Agreement. If the owrler fails to do so, the City may remove the radiant heat system or parking pad to the extent it impacts the Easement Areas and charge the cost of removal back to the owner for reimbursement. 5. RECORDING. This Agreement shall run with the land and shall be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. CITY OF CHANHASSEN (SEAL)Elise Ryan, Mayor And Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF CARVER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day offfi 3'3,1#'.'ff"XI3.:,TlH"*UIlf il,li";",i'i,'JJ:1']#T.lff :i the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC By ) )ss. ) 108 OWNERS: BY 4A Brian T. Bruner as the Trustee of the Restatement of Brian T. Bruner Trust Agreement BY Elise R. Bruner Brian T. Bruner of the Restatement of STATE OF [[z0nrrzso*q, ) couNTY oFc*orrr-ltt The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I O day of )c*av-n- ,2025, by Brian T. Bruner and Elise R Bruner as the Trustees of the Restatement of Brian T. Bruner Trust Agreement. ARY PUBLIC KATLYN M. VOGT Public-MinnesotaNotary aPgJan.31,Commi$ion Erpir€rMy 109 BY Elise R as the Trustee of the Elise R. Bruner Trust Agreement BY ua Brian T. Bruner as the Trustee of the Elise R. Bruner Trust Agreement STATE On [y'.rr,tn",*-so+^- ) COLINTY OFC ^ )ss. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / O day of 0 ca>vz"-r 2A25,by Elise R. Bruner and Brian T. Bruner, as the Trustee of the Elise R Bruner Trust Agreement. DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Pr ofe s si o n al A s s o ci att o n Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eaga.,, Minnesota 55T21 Telephone: 65 1 -452-5000 AMP/amt KATLYN M. VOGT Public-MinnesotaNotaryztnJan.31.Cornltlis3ion Er;iresMys6il1 110 EXHIBIT "A" Page I ! 9loz,il|tl uen mous ,l=.9!/l I6aU JasuB 't. a z.f - - - 6rH Driveway heating elements in ROW and or D&U-at Secondary entrance per accepted varaance ot drain at h( ow iprotection for l1@ tr o noo =o I I 3t: B€YONE -l-,-- ..s a --t Driveway heating elements in ROW and or D&U uJater ar€a I or similar to orseshoe urv N/lain i lS'!2 from rev ts r0n location lomil - noil inecessary I DRAIN a , 111 City Council Item October 13, 2025 Item Approve Amendments to Stormwater Management Agreements for Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, of Fox Ridge Estates. (Planning Case 2022-10) File No.Planning Case 2022-10 Item No: D.9 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Eric Maass, Community Development Director Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION Motion to approve the Stormwater Management Agreement amendments for Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, of Fox Ridge Estates. Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY The Fox Ridge subdivision proposed to utilize individual Best Management Practices (BMPs) to manage stormwater generated by the proposed development. The City approved BMP designs for the project, and the developer has since elected to modify the BMP design, which requires an updating of these agreements such that the design and maintenance plan on record is accurate. The proposed BMP is in the same location as the previously approved BMP's having a net neutral impact on tree removals on site. The modified BMP designs have been reviewed by both the City and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) and approved by staff for construction. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION 112 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the agreement amendments as presented. ATTACHMENTS DOCS-#237367-v1-AMENDMENT_TO_STORMWATER_MAINTENANCE_AGREEMENT_ROHLFSEN DOCS-#237369-v1-AMENDMENT_TO_STORMWATER_MAINTENANCE_AGREEMENT_AHA_RE_LLC DOCS-#237368-v1-AMENDMENT_TO_STORMWATER_MAINTENANCE_AGREEMENT_QUINNELL 113 1 237367v1 AMENDMENT TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/ BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE FACILITIES THIS AMENDMENT TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE FACILITIES (“Amendment”) is made this ____ day of _______________, 2025, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”) and MICHAEL ROHLFSEN and MIMI CHO- ROHLFSEN, spouses married to each other (the “Owners”). RECITALS A. The City and Fox Hill Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, predecessor in interest to the Owners, entered into a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement/Best Management Practice Facilities dated March 13, 2025 and recorded with the Carver County Registrar of Title’s Office on June 6, 2023 as Document No. T227284 (“Agreement”) for the property legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto (“Property”); B. The stormwater Facilities within the Property have been modified and the parties desire to correct exhibits to the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the City and Owners agree as follows: 1. Exhibit B. Exhibit B to the Agreement is amended in its entirety as provided in Exhibit B, attached hereto. 2. Survival of Other Provisions of Agreement. Except as otherwise provided in this Amendment, all other provisions of the Agreement survive and shall be given full force and effect. 114 2 237367v1 3. Recording. This Amendment will be recorded against the Property and will run with the land and bind Owners’ successors and assigns. [Remainder of this page intentionally left blank; signatures set forth on the following two pages] 115 3 237367v1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: ____________________________________ Elise Ryan, Mayor By: ____________________________________ Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ___________, 2025, by Elise Ryan and Laurie Hokkanen, respectively, the Mayor and City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ______________________________________ Notary Public 116 4 237367v1 OWNERS: Michael Rohlfsen Mimi Cho-Rohlfsen STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of ________________, 2025, by Michael Rohlfsen, spouse to Mimi Cho-Rohlfsen. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of ________________, 2025, by Mimi Cho-Rohlfsen, spouse to Michael Rohlfsen. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 AMP/smt 117 5 237367v1 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property Lot 1, Block 1, Fox Ridge Estates, Carver County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof 118 6 237367v1 EXHIBIT B 119 1 237369v1 AMENDMENT TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/ BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE FACILITIES THIS AMENDMENT TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE FACILITIES (“Amendment”) is made this ____ day of _______________, 2025, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”) and AHA RE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Owner”). RECITALS A. The City and Fox Hill Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, predecessor in interest to the Owner, entered into a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement/Best Management Practice Facilities dated March 13, 2025 and recorded with the Carver County Registrar of Title’s Office on June 6, 2023 as Document No. T227285 (“Agreement”) for the property legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto (“Property”); B. The stormwater Facilities within the Property have been modified and the parties desire to correct exhibits to the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the City and Owner agree as follows: 1. Exhibit B. Exhibit B to the Agreement is amended in its entirety as provided in Exhibit B, attached hereto. 2. Survival of Other Provisions of Agreement. Except as otherwise provided in this Amendment, all other provisions of the Agreement survive and shall be given full force and effect. 120 2 237369v1 3. Recording. This Amendment will be recorded against the Property and will run with the land and bind Owner’s successors and assigns. [Remainder of this page intentionally left blank; signatures set forth on the following two pages] 121 3 237369v1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: ____________________________________ Elise Ryan, Mayor By: ____________________________________ Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ___________, 2025, by Elise Ryan and Laurie Hokkanen, respectively, the Mayor and City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ______________________________________ Notary Public 122 4 237369v1 OWNER: AHA RE LLC By: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _______________, 2025, by __________________, the Chief Manager of AHA RE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of said entity. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 AMP/smt 123 5 237369v1 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property Lot 2, Block 1, Fox Ridge Estates, Carver County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof 124 6 237369v1 EXHIBIT B 125 1 237368v1 AMENDMENT TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/ BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE FACILITIES THIS AMENDMENT TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE FACILITIES (“Amendment”) is made this ____ day of _______________, 2025, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”) and ALEXANDRA QUINNELL and ALEX QUINNELL, spouses married to each other (the “Owners”). RECITALS A. The City and Fox Hill Properties, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, predecessor in interest to the Owners, entered into a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement/Best Management Practice Facilities dated March 13, 2025 and recorded with the Carver County Registrar of Title’s Office on June 6, 2023 as Document No. T227286 (“Agreement”) for the property legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto (“Property”); B. The stormwater Facilities within the Property have been modified and the parties desire to correct exhibits to the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the City and Owners agree as follows: 1. Exhibit B. Exhibit B to the Agreement is amended in its entirety as provided in Exhibit B, attached hereto. 2. Survival of Other Provisions of Agreement. Except as otherwise provided in this Amendment, all other provisions of the Agreement survive and shall be given full force and effect. 126 2 237368v1 3. Recording. This Amendment will be recorded against the Property and will run with the land and bind Owners’ successors and assigns. [Remainder of this page intentionally left blank; signatures set forth on the following two pages] 127 3 237368v1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: ____________________________________ Elise Ryan, Mayor By: ____________________________________ Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ___________, 2025, by Elise Ryan and Laurie Hokkanen, respectively, the Mayor and City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ______________________________________ Notary Public 128 4 237368v1 OWNERS: Alexandra Quinnell Alex Quinnell STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of ________________, 2025, by Alexandra Quinnell, spouse to Alex Quinnell. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of ________________, 2025, by Alex Quinnell, spouse to Alexandra Quinnell. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 AMP/smt 129 5 237368v1 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property Lot 3, Block 1, Fox Ridge Estates, Carver County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof 130 6 237368v1 EXHIBIT B 131 City Council Item October 13, 2025 Item Award Construction Contract for Driveway Improvements at Lake Lucy Ground Storage Reservoir File No.PW158 Item No: D.10 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Kate Salihovic, Public Works Support Specialist Reviewed By Charlie Burke SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves a Not-To-Exceed Contract of $55,000 to Kusske Construction Company, LLC for Driveway Improvements at the Lake Lucy Ground Storage Reservoir." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY The driveway to the Lake Lucy Ground Storage Reservoir is at a point where it needs replacement. BACKGROUND The driveway was last paved in 2016. A small parking area for city maintenance vehicles while working at the site is also being added. DISCUSSION The contract is based on the city's standard non-bid contract for goods and services. The work is scheduled to be completed by the end of October. 132 BUDGET The Public Works Department solicited quotes for the work. Four quotes were returned with Kusske Construction being the lowest. Company Quote Kusske Construction $ 48,480.00 Bituminous Roadways $ 54,590.00 GMH Asphalt $ 55,335.01 Northwest Asphalt $ 65,380.00 This project will be paid for under the Water Enterprise Fund, 700-0000-4550 Repair & Maintenance, which has available budget to cover the expense. RECOMMENDATION Kusske Construction has previously successfully performed work for the city on many occasions. Staff recommends awarding a contract to Kusske Construction Company, LLC for the paving work. ATTACHMENTS Contract Quotes 133 1 NON-BID CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF GOODS AND SERVICES AGREEMENT made this 3rd day of October 2025, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and KUSSKE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Corporation ("Contractor"). IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the “Contract Documents,” all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A.This Agreement. B.Request for Quotes, dated September 17th, 2025. C.Contractor’s Quote dated October 1st, 2025. In the event of a conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts. Contract Document “A” has the first priority and Contract Document “C” has the last priority. 2.CONTRACTOR OBLIGATIONS. The Contractor shall provide the goods, services and perform the work in accordance with the Contract Documents (“Work”). Contractor shall provide all personnel, supervision, services, materials, tools, equipment and supplies and do all things necessary and ancillary thereto specified in the Contract Documents. 3.CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS. A.Contractor has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents and other related data identified in the Contract Documents. B.Contractor is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local Laws and Regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. C.Contractor has given City written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that Contractor has discovered in the Contract Documents, and the written resolution thereof by City is acceptable to Contractor. D.The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work. 4.COMPENSATION. Contractor shall be paid by the City for the goods and services described in Paragraph 2 in accordance with the Quote, but not to exceed $ 55,000.00 which is inclusive of reimbursable expenses. The fee shall not be adjusted even if the estimated number of 134 Contract.docx 2 hours to perform a task, or any other estimate, assumption or matter is wrong or exceeded. Payment shall be made periodically after a service has been completed and within thirty-five (35) days of receipt of an invoice. 5.COMPLETION DATE. The Contractor shall complete the Work on or before November 21st, 2025. 6.WARRANTY. The Contractor shall be held responsible for any and all defects in workmanship and materials and upon notification by the City shall immediately replace or repair the defective workmanship and materials without cost to the City. The Contractor warrants that only new unused materials will be used. The Contractor further warrants to the City that all materials and services furnished under the Contract will be in conformance with Contract Documents and that the goods are of merchantable quality and are fit for the use for which they are sold. These warranties are in addition to any manufacturer's standard warranty, and any warranty provided by law. 7.RIGHTS AND REMEDIES. A.The duties and obligations imposed by the Contract Documents, and the rights and remedies available thereunder shall be in addition to, and not a limitation of, any duties, obligations, rights and remedies otherwise imposed or available by law. B.No action, or failure to act, by the City or the Contractor shall constitute a waiver of any right or duty afforded any of them under the Contract, nor shall any such action or failure to act constitute an approval of, or acquiescence in, any breach there under, except as may be specifically agreed in writing. 8.CHANGES TO WORK. Without invalidating the Contract, the City may, at any time, or from time to time, order additions, deletions or revisions in the work provided under this Agreement; these will be authorized by an amendment to the Contract. Upon approval of an amendment, Contractor shall proceed with the work provided under the amendment. Changes in the Contract Price shall be based upon the prices identified in the Quote provided or negotiated between the parties based on similar work provided in the Proposal. 9.UNAUTHORIZED WORK. Additional work performed without authorization of an amendment of this Contract will not entitle Contractor to an increase in the Compensation or an extension of the Contract. 10.DOCUMENTS. The City shall be the owner of all documents, reports, studies, analysis and the like prepared by the Contractor in conjunction with this contract. 11.COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services hereunder, Contractor shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provisions of goods and services to be provided. This contract may be terminated by the City at any time upon discovery by the City that the Contractor or any of its subcontractors has submitted a false statement under oath verifying compliance with any of the minimum criteria set forth in Minn. Stat. §16C.285, Subdivision 3, the Responsible Contractor statute. 135 Contract.docx 3 12.STANDARD OF CARE. Contractor shall exercise the same degrees of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a professional Contractor under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement. City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of Contractor’s services. 13.INDEMNIFICATION. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, and its employees, officials, and agents from and against all claims, actions, damages, losses and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, arising out of Contractor’s negligence or its performance or failure to perform its obligations under this Contract. Contractor’s indemnification obligation shall apply to subcontractor(s), or anyone directly or indirectly employed or hired by Contractor, or anyone for whose acts Contractor may be liable. Contractor agrees this indemnity obligation shall survive the completion or termination of this Contract. 14.INSURANCE. Prior to the start of the project, Contractor shall furnish to the City a certificate of insurance showing proof of the required insurance required under this Paragraph. Contractor shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, such insurance as shall protect Contractor and the City for work covered by the Contract including workers’ compensation claims and property damage, bodily and personal injury which may arise from operations under this Contract, whether such operations are by Contractor or anyone directly or indirectly employed by either of them. The minimum amounts of insurance shall be as follows: Commercial General Liability (or in combination with an umbrella policy) $2,000,000 Each Occurrence $2,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Aggregate $2,000,000 Annual Aggregate The following coverages shall be included: Premises and Operations Bodily Injury and Property Damage Personal and Advertising Injury Blanket Contractual Liability Products and Completed Operations Liability Automobile Liability $2,000,000 Combined Single Limit – Bodily Injury & Property Damage Including Owned, Hired & Non-Owned Automobiles Workers Compensation Workers’ Compensation insurance in accordance with the statutory requirements of the State of Minnesota, including Employer’s Liability with minimum limits are as follows: $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Disease per employee $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Disease aggregate $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Accident 136 Contract.docx 4 The Contractor’s insurance must be “Primary and Non-Contributory”. All insurance policies (or riders) required by this Contract shall be (i) taken out by and maintained with responsible insurance companies organized under the laws of one of the states of the United States and qualified to do business in the State of Minnesota, (ii) shall name the City, its employees and agents as additional insureds (CGL and umbrella only) by endorsement which shall be filed with the City. A copy of the endorsement must be submitted with the certificate of insurance. Contractor’s policies and Certificate of Insurance shall contain a provision that coverage afforded under the policies shall not be cancelled without at least thirty (30) days’ advanced written notice to the City, or ten (10) days’ notice for non-payment of premium. An Umbrella or Excess Liability insurance policy may be used to supplement Contractor’s policy limits on a follow-form basis to satisfy the full policy limits required by this Contract. 15.INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains the Contractor as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. The Contractor is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Contractor shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Contractor shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Contractor's performance under this Agreement. City and Contractor agree that Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Contractor or any of Contractor's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Contractor shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Contractor's own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 16.SUBCONTRACTORS. Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. Contractor shall comply with Minnesota Statute § 471.425. Contractor must pay Subcontractor for all undisputed services provided by Subcontractor within ten days of Contractor’s receipt of payment from City. Contractor must pay interest of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month to Subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to Subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. 17.ASSIGNMENT. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, nor any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 18.WAIVER. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 19.ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 137 Contract.docx 5 20.CONTROLLING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 21.COPYRIGHT. Contractor shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or patent by reason of the use or adoption of any designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting there from. 22.RECORDS/AUDIT. The Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records of time and expense involved in the performance of services. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 16C.05, Subd. 5, any books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of City and Contractor relevant to the Agreement are subject to examination by City and Contactor, and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor as appropriate. City and Contractor agree to maintain these records for a period of six years from the date of performance of all services covered under this Agreement. 23.MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Contractor must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Contractor pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event Contractor receives a request to release data, Contractor must immediately notify City. City will give Contractor instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Contractor’s officers’, agents’, city’s, partners’, employees’, volunteers’, assignees’ or subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 24.TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by City on two (2) days’ written notice delivered to Contractor at the address on file with the City. Upon termination under this provision if there is no fault of the Contractor, the Contractor shall be paid for goods and services rendered and reimbursable expenses until the effective date of termination. If the City terminates the Agreement because the Contractor has failed to perform in accordance with this Agreement, no further payment shall be made to the Contractor, and the City may retain another Contractor to undertake or complete the work identified in this Agreement. 138 Contract.docx 6 Dated:__________________ CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: Elise Ryan, Mayor And: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Dated:__________________ KUSSKE CONTRUCTION COMPANY LLC By: Print Name:_________________________________ Its:________________________________________ 139 140 141 142 143 144 City Council Item October 13, 2025 Item Approve Partial Release of Development Contract File No.25-08 Item No: D.11 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Eric Maass, Community Development Director Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION Motion to approve partial release of development contract as presented. Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY With the approvals of the Avienda Townhomes project, the development contract for that project applied to the townhomes and the outlots within that plat. A portion of that outlot is now being platted for the Avienda Apartments project. As a result, the Avienda Apartments developer has requested that the city grant a partial release of the Avienda Townhomes development contract such that the terms of that contract will not apply to the land platted for the Avienda Apartment project. This is considered a routine action and is common for phased developments. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET 145 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the partial release to the development contract as proposed. ATTACHMENTS Partial Release of Development Contract - Avienda Apartments 146 1 (reserved for recording information) PARTIAL RELEASE OF DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT PARTIAL RELEASE OF DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT granted this ______ day of ________________, 2025, by the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”). WHEREAS, the City and Level 7 Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, have entered into a Development Contract dated May 19, 2025 and recorded May 22, 2025 with the Office of the County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota as Document No. A786580 (“Contract”); and WHEREAS, the City has been requested to release and discharge the property legally described on Exhibit A (“Property”) from the Contract; WHEREAS, all requirements of the Contract have been met as to the Property and there is no longer a need to have the Contract recorded against the Property. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota: The Property is released and discharged from the Contract. ADOPTED this _____ day of _______________, 2025. [Remainder of the page is intentionally left blank. Signature page is to follow.] 147 2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN (Seal) By ____________________________________ Elise Ryan, Mayor By ____________________________________ Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ____________, 2025, by Elise Ryan and Laurie Hokkanen, respectively the Mayor and the City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ___________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON, Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 AMP/amt 148 3 EXHIBIT A Lot 1, Block 1, Avienda Apartments, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. 149 City Council Item October 13, 2025 Item Approve Development Contract for Avienda Apartments (Planning Case 25-08) File No.25-08 Item No: D.12 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Eric Maass, Community Development Director Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "Motion to approve the Development Contract for Avienda Apartments as presented." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY The City Council previously approved the Avienda Apartments site plan, preliminary plat and final plat applications. A condition of the final plat approval was the applicant entering into a development contract with the city. This satisfies that condition. The Development Contract has been reviewed by the City Attorney and found to be acceptable. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET 150 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the development contract as presented. ATTACHMENTS Avienda Apartments Development Contract 151 236689v6 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA AVIENDA APARTMENTS DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) 152 236689v6 TABLE OF CONTENTS SPECIAL PROVISIONS PAGE 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL ............................................................................ SP-1 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL ........................................................................ SP-1 3. DEVELOPMENT PLANS ............................................................................................ SP-1 4. IMPROVEMENTS ........................................................................................................ SP-2 5. OVERALL PLAN AND IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................... SP-2 6. TIME OF PERFORMANCE ......................................................................................... SP-2 7. SECURITY .................................................................................................................... SP-2 8. NOTICE ......................................................................................................................... SP-3 9. OTHER SPECIAL CONDITIONS................................................................................ SP-3 10. GENERAL CONDITIONS ........................................................................................... SP-5 11. PROOF OF PARKING ADDENDUM ......................................................................... SP-6 12. THIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARY ................................................................................. SP-6 GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. RIGHT TO PROCEED ................................................................................................. GC-1 2. PHASED DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................ GC-1 3. PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS ................................................................................ GC-1 4. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS ..................................................................... GC-1 5. IMPROVEMENTS ....................................................................................................... GC-1 6. IRON MONUMENTS .................................................................................................. GC-2 7. LICENSE ...................................................................................................................... GC-2 8. SITE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ......................................................... GC-2 8A. EROSION CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION OF A DWELLING OR OTHER BUILDING ......................................................................................... GC-2 9. CLEAN UP ................................................................................................................... GC-3 10. ACCEPTANCE AND OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS .................................... GC-3 11. INTENTIONALLY DELETED ................................................................................... GC-3 12. PARK DEDICATION .................................................................................................. GC-3 13. LANDSCAPING .......................................................................................................... GC-3 14. WARRANTY ............................................................................................................... GC-4 15. LOT PLANS ................................................................................................................. GC-4 16. EXISTING ASSESSMENTS ....................................................................................... GC-4 17. HOOK-UP CHARGES ................................................................................................. GC-4 18. PUBLIC STREET LIGHTING..................................................................................... GC-4 19. SIGNAGE ..................................................................................................................... GC-5 20. BUILDING PAD .......................................................................................................... GC-5 21. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS ................................................................................ GC-5 22. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT ......................................................................................... GC-6 153 236689v6 22. MISCELLANEOUS A. Construction Trailers ........................................................................................ GC-6 B. Postal Service .................................................................................................... GC-7 C. Third Parties ...................................................................................................... GC-7 D. Breach of Contract ............................................................................................ GC-7 E. Severability ....................................................................................................... GC-7 F. Building Permits ............................................................................................... GC-7 G. Waivers/Amendments ....................................................................................... GC-7 H. Release .............................................................................................................. GC-7 I. Insurance ........................................................................................................... GC-7 J. Remedies ........................................................................................................... GC-8 K. Assignability ..................................................................................................... GC-8 L. Construction Hours ........................................................................................... GC-8 M. Noise Amplification .......................................................................................... GC-8 N. Access ............................................................................................................... GC-8 O. Street Maintenance............................................................................................ GC-8 P. Storm Sewer Maintenance ................................................................................ GC-9 Q. Soil Treatment Systems .................................................................................... GC-9 R. Variances........................................................................................................... GC-9 S. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations ..................................... GC-9 T. Proof of Title ..................................................................................................... GC-9 U. Soil Conditions................................................................................................ GC-10 V. Soil Correction ................................................................................................ GC-10 W. Haul Routes ......................................................................................................... GC-10 X. Development Signs .............................................................................................. GC-10 Y. Construction Plans ............................................................................................... GC-10 Z. As-Built Lot Surveys ........................................................................................... GC-11 154 236689v6 CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) AVIENDA APARTMENTS SPECIAL PROVISIONS DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (the “Contract”) dated October 13, 2025 by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”), and Avienda Apartments Owner, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Developer”). 1. Request for Plat Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for a 412-unit multi-family development, Avienda Apartments (referred to in this Contract as the “Plat”). The land is legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" (referred to in this Contract as the “Property”). 2. Conditions of Plat Approval. The City approved the Plat on September 22, 2025 with approval of such Plat conditional on the Developer entering into and recording this Contract and furnishing the security required by it. The Developer must record the Contract and the Plat with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 120 days after the City Council approves this Contract. 3. Development Plans. The construction of the 412-unit multifamily development and related improvements on the Property is referred to in this Contract as the “Project”. The Project shall be developed in accordance with the plans provided below together with the following plans to be approved by the City for consistency with this Development Contract and City Code: site plan, grading plan, utility plan, SWPPP Plan and Narrative (the “Project Plans”). The Project Plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the Project Plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms of this Contract shall control. The Project Plans are: Plan A: Final Plat, prepared by Landform Professional Services 4. Improvements. The Developer shall install and pay for the following improvements on the Property (collectively, the “Multifamily Improvements”): A. Sanitary Sewer System B. Water System C. Storm Water Drainage System D. Streets E. Concrete Curb and Gutter F. Site Grading/Restoration 155 236689v6 G. Underground Utilities (e.g. gas, electric, telephone, CATV) H. Setting of Lot and Block Monuments I. Surveying and Staking J. Landscaping K. Erosion Control 5. Overall Plans and Improvements. The Project is a part of a larger planned development, which larger development requires improvements on one or more separate parcels not owned by Developer, including the design and construction of a regional stormwater pond and extension of Avienda Parkway, along with improvements on the Property that benefit adjacent parcels, including a stormwater detention pond on the northern portion of the Property (collectively, the “Overall Improvements”). The Overall Improvements shall be constructed in accordance with following plans (the “Overall Improvement Plans”). Although Developer does not own all of the property on which the Overall Improvements are to be constructed, Developer and the City agree that the Overall Improvement shall be constructed and accepted prior to this Project receiving its Certificate of Occupancy. The Overall Improvement Plans shall be submitted by or caused to be submitted by the Developer to the City and the City will review and provide comments to the Overall Improvement Plans in a timely manner following submittal of the Overall Improvement Plans. The City agrees that the Overall Improvement Plans may be prepared and submitted by the third-party owner of the parcels on which the Overall Improvements are to be located or the Developer. • Construction Drawings for the Regional Stormwater Pond Including Stormwater, Grading and SWPPP Plans • Construction Drawings for the Avienda Parkway Extension from the Sunset Trail/Avienda roundabout to the Property 6. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required Multifamily Improvements (except landscaping) by March 31, 2028. Landscaping shall be completed by August 31, 2028. The Overall Improvements must be completed by March 31, 2028 or prior to the Certificate of Occupancy for the Project. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City Engineer for the Overall Improvements or Multifamily Improvements. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 7. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Contract, payment of special assessments, payment of the costs of all public improvements, and construction of all public improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with two letters of credit, each in the form attached hereto, from one or more banks reasonably acceptable to the City, or cash escrow ("security") for Multifamily Improvements in the amount of $1,931,513.50 and for the Overall Improvements in the amount of $1,287,787.48. The amount of the security was calculated as 110% of the following: 156 236689v6 MULTIFAMILY IMPROVEMENTS Site Grading/Erosion Control/Restoration $492,500 Sanitary Sewer $91,100 Watermain $125,480 Storm Sewer, Drainage System, including cleaning and maintenance (underground system + interim condition pond) $223,400 Streets $708,568 Sub-total, Construction Costs $1,641,048 Engineering, surveying, and inspection (7% of construction costs) $114,873.36 Sub-total, Other Costs $114,873.36 TOTAL COST OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS $1,755,921.36 SECURITY AMOUNT (110% of $1,755,921.36 ) $1,931,513.50 OVERALL IMPROVEMENTS Site Grading/Erosion Control/Restoration – NPDES Pond Construction and Fill $19,264 Sanitary Sewer $49,300 Watermain Extension from Avienda Parkway & Sunset Trail to Property $36,700 Storm Sewer, Drainage System, including cleaning and maintenance (offsite RCP pipe connection to regional SW pond, regional pond itself, northern surface pond conversion to chamber system) $948,727 Streets $40,136 Sub-total, Construction Costs $1,094,127 Engineering, surveying, and inspection (7% of construction costs) $76,588.89 Sub-total, Other Costs $76,588.89 TOTAL COST OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS $1,170,715.89 SECURITY AMOUNT (110% of $1,170,715.89) $1,287,787.48 This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the Multifamily Improvements security (“Multifamily Security”). The Multifamily Security shall be subject to the approval of the City. For the Multifamily Improvements, the City may draw down the Multifamily Security, without notice, for any violation of the terms of this Contract. If the required public Multifamily Improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the Multifamily Security is drawn down, the draw shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the city engineer or designee that 157 236689v6 the relevant work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, the City shall reduce the portion of the Multifamily Security attributable to the specific scope of the completed work, but in no case shall the Multifamily Security be reduced to a point less than 10% of the original amount of the Multifamily Security until (1) all Multifamily Improvements have been completed, (2) iron monuments for lot corners have been installed, (3) all financial obligations to the City satisfied (except the financial obligations secured by the Multifamily Security), (4) the required “record” plans of the Multifamily Improvements have been received by the City, (5) a warranty security for the public Multifamily Improvements is provided, and (6) the public Multifamily Improvements are accepted by the City. This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security for the Overall Improvements (“Overall Security”). The Overall Security shall be subject to the approval of the City. If the required public Overall Improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security or prior to March 31, 2028 (subject to any extension granted by the City), the City may draw it down. If the Overall Security is drawn down, the draw shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the city engineer or designee that the relevant work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, the City shall reduce the portion of the Overall Security attributable to the specific scope of the completed work, but in no case shall the Overall Security be reduced to a point less than 10% of the original amount of the Overall Security until (1) all Overall Improvements have been completed, (2) a warranty security for the Overall Improvements is provided, and (2) the public Overall Improvements are accepted by the City. 8. Notice. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand- delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: Jacquel Hajder Avienda Apartments Owner, LLC 7803 Glenroy Rd., Suite 200 Bloomington, MN 55439 Phone: 852-288-2000 Email: jacquel.hajder@dorancompanies.com With a copy to: Avienda Apartments Owner, LLC Attn: Legal Department 7803 Glenroy Rd., Suite 200 Bloomington, MN 55439 Phone: 852-288-2000 Email: legal@dorancompanies.com Email: anne.behrendt@dorancompanies.com 158 236689v6 And: Mark Nordland Level 7 Development, LLC 4600 Kings Point Road Minnetrista, MN 55331 Phone: 612-812-7020 Email: mnordland@nordlandpartners.com Level 7 Development, LLC 4600 Kings Point Road Minnetrista, Minnesota 55344 Attn: Mercedes Rhodes (612) 203-2494 Email: ariusrealestatedevelopment@gmail.com Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 700 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Attn: Larry Wertheim (612) 337-9216 Email: lwertheim@kennedy-graven.com Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall Attn: City Manager 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Telephone (952) 227-1100. 9. Other Special Conditions. A. FEES 1. Prior to release of the plat for recording and prior to scheduling a pre-construction meeting, Developer shall submit to the City $3,309,071.56, for the following City fees: 159 236689v6 *Administration fee (based on estimated construction cost of $2,926,637.25 2.5% for the first $1,000,000, and 1.5% of the remaining $1,926,637.25 of the improvement costs) $53,899.56 GIS fee: 2 parcels @ $31/parcel + $103 for the plat $134 Park Dedication Fee $1,565,600 Surface Water Management Fee $196,350 City Sewer Access Charge (SAC) (412 units at $771 per unit at 30%) $317,652 City Water Access Charge (WAC) (412 units at $2,853 per unit at 30%) $1,175,436 Total $ 3,309,071.56 B. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Department: 1. The Developer shall secure a temporary drainage easement agreement for the discharge of the stormwater into a temporary offsite stormwater management pond within Outlot A, Avienda Apartments (the “Temporary Drainage Easement Agreement”) and a permanent stormwater utility easement over the portion of Outlot A, Avienda Apartments on which the regional stormwater facility will be located for the benefit of Lot 1, Block 1, which, as a Common Utility Line (as defined in the existing Reciprocal Easements and Operating Agreement governing the Project), will be subject to an easement under the existing Reciprocal Easements and Operating Agreement governing the Project and managed by Level 7 Development, LLC, the Operator under that instrument. If the temporary offsite stormwater management pond has not been fully constructed prior to recording the final Plat, the Developer shall secure a temporary construction easement over Outlot A, Avienda Apartments allowing the Developer, or the City, to construct the temporary offsite stormwater management pond. The Developer shall also secure a temporary construction easement over such parcels as is necessary for the construction of the Overall Improvements allowing the Developer, or the City, to construct the Overall Improvements if not otherwise constructed within relevant timeframes; provided, however, that such temporary construction easement may be held in escrow, rather that recorded with the final Plat, provided that it shall be released from escrow and recorded by either the Developer or the City if necessary. 2. The 6-foot wide meandering path along the south, west, and northern portions of the Property shall be encumbered with a public access easement that will be recorded simultaneously with recording of the final Plat. 3. All lighting shall have a total cutoff angle equal to or less than 90 degrees. 160 236689v6 4. The Developer shall construct courtyard improvements in accordance with the Project Plans that specify an impervious cover of 50% or less (excluding those portions of the courtyard where the building podium is located). Forestry Department: 1. The Developer shall install plantings in accordance with the Project Plans and the City ordinance for species diversity as outlined in City Code Section 20-1183, Tree Diversity. No more than ten percent of the trees may be from any one tree species, no more than 20 percent of the trees may be from any one genus, and no more than 30 percent of trees from any one family. Engineering Department 1. The Developer shall enter into an Encroachment Agreement for the monument sign on the north of the property located within the 10-foot wide public drainage and utility corridor abutting Avienda Parkway right-of-way which must be recorded simultaneously with the final Plat. 2. Final construction plans will be subject to review and approval by staff. 3. Except for the meandering path to be publicly dedicated, all newly constructed streets and sidewalks will be privately owned and maintained. The Developer shall provide for review and approval maintenance agreements for these improvements to be recorded simultaneously with the final Plat (which may be included as part of an amendment to the existing Reciprocal Easements and Operating Agreement governing the Project). 4. Construction design elements associated with the street plans such as stationing, curb tables and alignments, centerline grades, and intersection details will be required in final construction plans. 5. It is the Developer’s responsibility to ensure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project (i.e. Army Corps of Engineers, DNR, MnDOT, Carver County, RPBC Watershed District, Board of Water and Soil Resources, PCA, MDH, MPCA, etc.). 6. At all locations where the proposed trail and sidewalk connect to existing pedestrian facilities, such connections must be constructed in order to meet current ADA standards. Pedestrian ramps at all sidewalk and trail street crossings in accordance with ADA and City standards must also be provided in accordance with the Project Plans. Water Resources Department: 1. Temporary stormwater management conditions must be maintained in accordance with the Project Plans for the temporary and permanent management of the onsite stormwater 161 236689v6 pond on the northside of the Property. Interim conditions must be maintained to manage the stormwater discharge rates for the 100-year storm event. 2. The Developer must maintain a temporary offsite stormwater management pond until the permanent regional pond has been constructed in accordance with the Overall Plans approved by the City and record the Temporary Drainage Easement Agreement simultaneously with the recording of the final Plat. 3. An Operations and Maintenance plan and Agreement in a form approved by the City for all proposed private stormwater infrastructure including the inspection frequency, maintenance schedule, and responsible party shall be recorded with the Development Contract and Plat. 4. The overall site has an approved permit by the watershed district that requires individual sites to obtain their own permits. 5. In the event the offsite regional stormwater pond is not approved by the City in the location consistent with the current watershed permit. the Developer shall revise their stormwater plans and permit with the watershed according to the final plan location approved by the City. Building Department: 1. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction. 2. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that the proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code. Additional comments or requirements may be required after building plan review. 4. The building is required to have automatic fire extinguishing systems. 5. The buildings’ proximity to property lines (and other buildings) will have an impact on the code requirements for the proposed buildings, including but not limited to; allowable size, protected openings and fire-resistive construction. These requirements will be addressed when complete building and site plans are submitted. 6. Building plans must include a code analysis that contains the following information: key plan, occupancy group, type of construction, allowable height and area, fire sprinklers, separated or non-separated, fire resistive elements (exterior walls, bearing walls - exterior or interior, shaft, incidental use), occupant load, exits required (common path, travel distance), and minimum plumbing fixture count. 162 236689v6 7. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high, measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. Retaining walls (if present) under four feet in height require a zoning permit. 8. Accessibility will have to be provided to all portions of the Project and a percentage of the units may also be required to be accessible or adaptable in accordance with Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1341. Further information is needed to determine these requirements. 9. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. Fire Department: 1. Balcony sprinklers are not required so long as the balcony structures remain under the required size by fire code and non-combustible materials for balconies and siding are used. Due to lack of courtyard access, stand pipe connections shall be provided near the pool deck for faster hose advancement capability. 2. Due to lack of fire access road on west side and access to pool deck, fire stand pipes must be provided in and around the pool area and rear of building and must be installed by a fire sprinkler designer. 3. First responder radio coverage study required. During construction, a first responder radio coverage test will be required, to be completed by a licensed contractor, in order to provide for a first responder radio signal repeater system. 4. All EV charging stations in underground garages will be required to be placed as close to the garage doors as possible for removal in case of a fire. 10. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Contract are attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein. 11. Proof of Parking Agreement. Developer is constructing a 412-unit multi-family apartment building on the Property. Pursuant to Section 20-1124.5 of the City Zoning Ordinance in and for the City of Chanhassen, 726 parking spaces are required for the Project. The Developer is constructing 633 parking spaces on the Property. The Developer shall enter into a Parking Deferment Agreement with the City and shall provide proof of parking to show that 93 parking stalls can be constructed by the Developer in the future if the need arises. The Parking Deferment Agreement must be recorded simultaneously with the recording of the final Plat. 12. Third-Party Beneficiary. Level 7 Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Level 7”), is constructing all of a portion of the Overall Improvements and is 163 236689v6 providing all or a portion of the security, including the letter(s) of credit, for the Overall Improvements and shall be deemed a third-party beneficiary of this Contract with respect to such Overall Improvements and security, including the letter(s) of credit. Level 7 shall be entitled to enforce all the rights of the Developer under this Contract with respect to the same. The provisions of this Paragraph shall control over any contrary provision contained in this Contract. {The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank. Signature pages to follow.} 164 236689v6 [Signature Page to Development Contract] CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Elise Ryan, Mayor (SEAL) AND: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20__, by Elise Ryan, Mayor, and by Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC 165 236689v6 [Signature Page to Development Contract] AVIENDA APARTMENTS OWNER, LLC BY: Name: Anne T. Behrendt Its: __________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2025, by Anne T. Behrendt, the _________________ of Avienda Apartments Owner, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of the company. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 166 236689v6 CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY Lot 1, Block 1, Avienda Apartments, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. 167 [OFFICIAL BANK LETTERHEAD] 236689v6 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. ___________________ Date: _________________ TO: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $____________, available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. __________, dated ________________, 2025, of First International Bank & Trust"; b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Manager of the City of Chanhassen. c) Be presented for payment at First International Bank & Trust during regular business hours on a business day that is on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 15, 2025, at the following address (or such other address as we may provide you in writing, provided such address is located within Minnesota): First International Bank & Trust 3600 Minnesota Drive, Suite 70 Edina, MN 55435 This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 15 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Chanhassen City Manager that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Chanhassen City Manager, Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. 168 [OFFICIAL BANK LETTERHEAD] 236689v6 We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in strict compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. We shall have no obligation to investigate the underlying transaction and shall honor draws based solely on strict compliance with the terms of this Letter of Credit. We shall not be obligated to make any further payments under this Letter of Credit once the full amount of credit available under this Letter of Credit has been drawn. First International Bank & Trust BY: ____________________________________ Its ______________________________ 169 236689v6 CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) EXHIBIT "B" GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Right to Proceed. Within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this Contract has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, 3) the Plat has been recorded with the County Recorder's Office or Registrar of Title’s Office of the County where the Plat is located, and 4) the City Engineer has issued a letter that the foregoing conditions have been satisfied and then the Developer may proceed. 2. Phased Development. If the plat is a phase of a multiphased preliminary plat, the City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent phases if the Developer has breached this Contract and the breach has not been remedied. Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until Development Contracts for such phases are approved by the City. Park charges and area charges for sewer and water referred to in this Contract are not being imposed on outlots, if any, in the plat that are designated in an approved preliminary plat for future subdivision into lots and blocks. Such charges will be calculated and imposed when the outlots are final platted into lots and blocks. 3. Preliminary Plat Status. If the plat is a phase of a multi-phased preliminary plat, the preliminary plat approval for all phases not final platted shall lapse and be void unless final platted into lots and blocks, not outlots, within two (2) years after preliminary plat approval. 4. Changes in Official Controls. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service area, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 5. Improvements. The improvements specified in the Special Provisions of this Contract shall be installed in accordance with City standards, ordinances, and plans and specifications which have been prepared and signed by a competent registered professional engineer furnished to 170 236689v6 the City and approved by the City Engineer. The Developer shall obtain all necessary permits from the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services and other pertinent agencies before proceeding with construction. The City will, at the Developer's expense, have one or more construction inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The Developer shall also provide a qualified inspector to perform site inspections on a daily basis. Inspector qualifications shall be submitted in writing to the City Engineer. The Developer shall instruct its project engineer/inspector to respond to questions from the City Inspector(s) and to make periodic site visits to satisfy that the construction is being performed to an acceptable level of quality in accordance with the engineer's design. The Developer or its engineer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. 6. Iron Monuments. Before the security for the completion of the utilities in the Multifamily Improvements is released, all monuments must be correctly placed in the ground in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 505.021. The Developer's surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 7. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. 8. Site Erosion and Sediment Control. Before the Property is rough graded, and before any utility construction is commenced or building permits are issued, the City approved erosion and sediment control plan shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion and sediment control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion and sediment control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion and sediment transport. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion and sediment control plan and schedule of supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion and sediment transport at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the Property is in full compliance with the erosion and sediment control requirements. Erosion and sediment control needs to be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored, even if construction has been completed and accepted. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion and sediment control, the City will authorize the removal of the erosion and sediment control, i.e. hay bales and silt fence. The Developer shall remove and dispose of the erosion and sediment control measures. 171 236689v6 8a. Erosion Control During Construction of a Dwelling or Other Building. Before a building permit is issued for construction of a dwelling or other building on the Property, a $500.00 cash escrow or letter of credit per lot shall also be furnished to the City to guarantee compliance with City Code § 7-22. 9. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 10. Acceptance and Ownership of Improvements. Except for streets and utilities identified as private under the terms of this Contract, all other improvements lying within public easements shall become City property upon completion and acceptance by the City of the work and construction required by this Contract. After completion of the public improvements, a representative of the contractor, and a representative of the Developer's engineer will make a final inspection of the work with the City Engineer. Before the City accepts the public improvements, the City Engineer shall be satisfied that all work is satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and the Developer and his engineer shall submit a written statement to the City Engineer certifying that the Project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. The appropriate contractor waivers shall also be provided. Final acceptance of the public improvements shall be by City Council resolution. 11. Intentionally Deleted. 12. Park Dedication. The Developer shall pay full park dedication fees in conjunction with the installation of the Multifamily Improvements. The park dedication fees shall be the current amount in force at the time of final platting pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinances and City Council resolutions. 13. Landscaping. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the City approved landscaping plan. Unless otherwise approved by the City, trees not listed in the City’s approved tree list are prohibited. The minimum tree size shall be two and one-half (2½) inches caliper, either bare root in season, or balled and burlapped. The trees may not be planted in the boulevard (area between curb and property line). In addition to any sod required as a part of the City approved erosion and sediment control plan, the Developer shall sod the boulevard area and all drainage ways on each lot utilizing a minimum of six (6) inches of topsoil as a base. Seed or sod shall also be placed on all disturbed areas of the Property. If these improvements are not in place at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested, a financial guarantee of $750.00 in the form of cash or letter of credit shall be provided to the City. These conditions must then be complied with within two (2) months after the certificate of occupancy issued, except that if the certificate of occupancy is issued between October 1 through May 1 these conditions must be complied with by the following July 1st. Upon expiration of the time period, inspections will be conducted by City staff to verify satisfactory completion of all conditions. City staff will conduct inspections of incomplete items with a $50.00 inspection fee 172 236689v6 deducted from the escrow fund for each inspection. After satisfactory inspection, the financial guarantee shall be returned. If the requirements are not satisfied, the City may use the security to satisfy the requirements. The City may also use the escrowed funds for maintenance of erosion control pursuant to City Code Section 7-22 or to satisfy any other requirements of this Contract or of City ordinances. These requirements supplement, but do not replace, specific landscaping conditions that may have been required by the City Council for project approval. 14. Warranty. The Developer warrants or will obtain a warranty for all improvements required to be constructed under the terms of this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The Developer shall submit either 1) a warranty/maintenance bond for 100% of the cost of the improvement, or 2) a letter of credit for twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount of the original cost of the following improvements: A. The required warranty period for materials and workmanship for the utility contractor installing public sewer and water mains shall be two (2) years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. B. The required warranty period for all work relating to street construction, including concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, materials and equipment shall be subject to two (2) years from the date of final written acceptance. C. The required warranty period for sod, trees, and landscaping is one full growing season following acceptance by the City. 15. Lot Plans. Prior to the issuance of building permits, an acceptable Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control including silt fences, shall be submitted for each lot for review and approval by the City Engineer. Each plan shall assure that drainage is maintained away from buildings and that tree removal is consistent with development plans and City Ordinance. 16. Existing Assessments. Any existing assessments against the Plat will be re-spread against the plat in accordance with City standards. 17. Hook-up Charges. At the time of recording of the Plat, the Developer shall pay 30% of the City Sewer Hook-up charge and 30% of the City Water hook up charge for each lot in the Plat in the amount specified in Special Provision, Paragraph 8, of this Development Contract. The balance of the hook-up charges is collected at the time building permits are issued based on 70% of the rates then in effect, unless a written request is made to assess the costs over a four year term at the rates in effect at time of application. 18. Public Street Lighting. The Developer shall have installed and pay for public street lights in accordance with City standards. The public street lights shall be accepted for City ownership and maintenance at the same time that the public street is accepted for ownership and maintenance if the project includes a public street. A plan shall be submitted for the City Engineer’s approval prior 173 236689v6 to the installation. The Developer shall pay the City a fee of $300.00 for each public street light installed as part of the Development. The fee shall be required only for public street lights and if required shall be paid prior to the City accepting the Improvements. The fee is used by the City for furnishing electricity and maintaining each public street light for twenty (20) months. The Developer shall select Standard Service for the agreement with the Utility. 19. Signage. All street signs, traffic signs, and wetland monumentation required by the City as a part of the Plat shall be furnished and installed by the City at the sole expense of the Developer. 20. Building Pad. The Developer shall promptly furnish the City “as-built” plans indicating the amount, type and limits of fill on the building pad location. 21. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall pay an administrative fee in conjunction with the installation of the Multifamily Improvements and Overall Improvements. This fee is to cover the cost of City Staff time and overhead for items such as review of construction documents, preparation of the Development Contract, monitoring construction progress, processing pay requests, processing security reductions, and final acceptance of improvements. This fee does not cover the City's cost for construction inspections. The fee shall be calculated as follows: i) if the cost of the construction of public Multifamily Improvements and Overall Improvements is less than $500,000, three percent (3%) of construction costs; ii) if the cost of the construction of public Multifamily Improvements and Overall Improvements is between $500,000 and $1,000,000, three percent (3%) of construction costs for the first $500,000 and two percent (2%) of construction costs over $500,000; iii) if the cost of the construction of public Multifamily Improvements and Overall Improvements is over $1,000,000, two and one-half percent (2½%) of construction costs for the first $1,000,000 and one and one-half percent (1½%) of construction costs over $1,000,000. Upon recording the Plat, the Developer shall deposit with the City a fee based upon construction estimates. After construction is completed, the final fee shall be determined based upon actual construction costs. The cost of public Multifamily Improvements and Overall Improvements is defined in paragraph 6 of the Special Provisions. B. In addition to the administrative fee, the Developer shall reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City for providing construction and erosion and sediment control inspections of 174 236689v6 the Property. This cost will be periodically billed directly to the Developer based on the actual progress of the construction. Payment shall be due in accordance with Article 21E of this Contract. C. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from Plat approval and development of the Property. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. D. In addition to the administrative fee, the Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including engineering and attorneys' fees. E. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all Plat development work and construction, including but not limited to the issuance of building permits for lots which the Developer may or may not have sold, until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as, but not limited to, sewer availability charges ("SAC"), City water connection charges, City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees. G. Private Utilities. The Developer shall have installed and pay for the installation of electrical, natural gas, telephone, and cable television service in conjunction with the overall development improvements. These services shall be provided in accordance with each of the respective franchise agreements held with the City. H. The Developer shall pay the City a fee established by City Council resolution, to reimburse the City for the cost of updating the City’s base maps, GIS data base files, and converting the Plat and record drawings into an electronic format. Record drawings must be submitted within four months of final acceptance of public utilities. All digital information submitted to the City shall be in the Carver County Coordinate system. 22. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 175 236689v6 23. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on-site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer as a part of the pre-construction meeting for installation of public improvements. Trailers shall be removed from the Property within thirty (30) days following the acceptance of the public improvements unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Except as provided in Section 12 of the General Conditions of this Contract, third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. The City is not a guarantor of the Developer’s obligations under this Contract. The City shall have no responsibility or liability to lot purchasers or others for the City’s failure to enforce this Contract or for allowing deviations from it. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties. The City may also issue a stop work order halting all Plat development until the breach has been cured and the City has received satisfactory assurance that the breach will not reoccur. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Building Permits. Building permits will not be issued in the Plat until sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer have been installed, tested, and accepted by the City, and the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the site graded and revegetated in accordance with the City approved grading plan. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Release. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Property. After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Contract, at the Developer's request the City Manager will issue a Certificate of Compliance. Prior to the issuance of such a certificate, individual lot owners may make a written request for a certificate applicable to an individual lot allowing a minimum of ten (10) days for processing. 176 236689v6 I. Insurance. Developer shall take out and maintain until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $500,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The certificate may not contain any disclaimer for failure to give the required notice. J. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, expressed or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. K. Assignability. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire Plat, or any part of it. L. Construction Hours. Construction hours, including pick-up and deliveries of material and equipment and the operation of any internal combustion engine, may only occur from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays with no such activity allowed on Sundays or on legal holidays. Contractors must require their subcontractors, agents and suppliers to comply with these requirements and the Contractor is responsible for their failure to do so. Under emergency conditions, this limitation may be waived by the written consent of the City Engineer. If construction occurs outside of the permitted construction hours, the Contractor shall pay the following administrative penalties: First violation $ 500.00 Second violation $ 1,000.00 Third & subsequent violations All site development and construction must cease for seven (7) calendar days M. Noise Amplification. The use of outdoor loudspeakers, bullhorns, intercoms, and similar devices is prohibited in conjunction with the construction of homes, buildings, and the improvements required under this contract. The administrative penalty for violation of construction hours shall also apply to violation of the provisions in this paragraph. 177 236689v6 N. Access. All access to the Property prior to the City accepting the roadway improvements shall be the responsibility of the Developer regardless if the City has issued building permits or occupancy permits for lots within the plat. O. Street Maintenance. The Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until streets within the plat are approved by the City. Warning signs shall be placed by the Developer when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and directing attention to detours. If streets become impassable, the City may order that such streets shall be barricaded and closed. The Developer shall maintain a smooth roadway surface and provide property surface drainage. The Developer may request, in writing, that the City plow snow on the streets prior to final approval of the streets. The City shall have complete discretion to approve or reject the request. The City shall not be responsible for reshaping or damage to the street base or utilities because of snow plowing operations. The provision of City snow plowing service does not constitute final approval of the streets by the City. P. Storm Sewer Maintenance. The Developer shall be responsible for cleaning and maintenance of the storm sewer system (including ponds, pipes, catch basins, culverts and swales) within the Plat. The Developer shall follow all instructions it receives from the City concerning the cleaning and maintenance of the storm sewer system. The Developer's obligations under this paragraph shall end two (2) years after the Multifamily Improvements and Overall Improvements associated with the Plat have been accepted by the City. Twenty percent (20%) of the storm sewer costs, shown under section 6 of the special provisions of this contract, will be held by the City for the duration of the 2-year maintenance period. Q. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the platting process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. R. Variances. By approving the plat, the Developer represents that all lots in the plat are buildable without the need for variances from the City's ordinances. S. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the plat the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District(s); 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. 178 236689v6 T. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers to enter into this Development Contract. U. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. V. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. On lots which have no fill material a soils report from a qualified soils engineer is not required unless the City's building inspection department determines from observation that there may be a soils problem. On lots with fill material that have been mass graded as part of a multi-lot grading project, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City issues a building permit for the lot. On lots with fill material that have been custom graded, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City inspects the foundation for a building on the lot. W. Haul Routes. The Developer, the Developer’s contractors or subcontractors must submit proposed haul routes for the import or export of soil, construction material, construction equipment or construction debris, or any other purpose. All haul routes must be approved by the City Engineer X. Development Signs. The Developer shall post a six foot by eight foot development sign in accordance with City Detail Plate No. 5313 at each entrance to the Project. The sign shall be in place before construction of the required improvements commences and shall be removed when the required Multifamily Improvements are completed, except for the final lift of asphalt on streets. The signs shall contain the following information: project name, name of developer, developer’s telephone number and designated contact person, allowed construction hours. Y. Construction Plans. Upon final plat approval, the Developer shall provide the City with two complete sets of full-size construction plans and four sets of 11”x17” reduced construction plan sets and three sets of specifications. Within four months after the completion of the utility improvements and base course pavement and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with the following: (1) a complete set of reproducible Mylar as-built plans, (2) two complete full-size sets of blue line/paper as-built plans, (3) two complete sets of utility tie sheets, 179 236689v6 (4) location of buried fabric used for soil stabilization, (5) location stationing and swing ties of all utility stubs including draintile cleanouts, (6) bench mark network, (7) digital file of as-built plans in both .dxf & .tif format (the .dxf file must be tied to the current county coordinate system), (8) digital file of utility tie sheets in either .doc or .tif format, and (9) a breakdown of lineal footage of all utilities installed, including the per lineal foot bid price. The Developer is required to submit the final plat in electronic format. Z. As-Built Lot Surveys. An as-built lot survey will be required on all lots prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued. The as-built lot survey must be prepared, signed, and dated by a Registered Land Surveyor. Sod and the bituminous driveways must be installed before the as-built survey is completed. If the weather conditions at the time of the as-built are not conducive to paving the driveway and/or installing sod, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued and the as-built escrow withheld until all work is complete. 180 City Council Item October 13, 2025 Item Resolution 2025-XX; Call for Public Hearing to Order the Market Boulevard Improvement Project File No.ENG 25-02 Item No: D.13 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves a resolution calling for a public hearing to be held at the October 27, 2025 City Council meeting to consider accepting the Feasibility Study and ordering the Market Boulevard Improvement Project." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY Market Boulevard is programmed for rehabilitation in 2026. The preliminary design is underway, and the Feasibility Study is scheduled to be presented to the City Council for acceptance at their meeting on October 27, 2025. BACKGROUND The project layout/scope has been reviewed by the City Council many times over the last 18 months. The proposed scope is a simplified rehabilitation project while incorporating needed work based on adjacent projects, funding, and permitting requirements. DISCUSSION 181 N/A BUDGET N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends calling for the Public Hearing. ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2025-XX - Call Improvement PH for 25-02 Market Blvd 182 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: October 13, 2025 RESOLUTION NO: 2025-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE MARKET BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 25-02 WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the City Council adopted February 27, 2023, a feasibility report is being prepared by Kimley-Horn, Inc. with reference to the above-referenced project, and this report will be received by the City Council on October 27, 2025, and WHEREAS, the feasibility report will provide information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for benefitting parcels. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council that the City Council will receive and consider accepting the feasibility study on October 27, 2025, and consider the improvements of such project in accordance with the report and the assessment of benefitting properties for a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 13th day of October, 2025. ATTEST: Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 183 City Council Item October 13, 2025 Item Resolution 2025-XX: Highway 5 Improvement Project authorizations File No.ENG 25-03 Item No: D.14 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves a resolution authorizing entering into a cooperative agreement with MnDOT, approves a resolution waiving a public hearing as part of the municipal consent process, and approves a Joint Powers Agreement with Carver County, all associated with the Highway 5 Improvement Project." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Operational Excellence SUMMARY The Highway 5 project is currently out for bids, with a planned award to a contractor in December. Construction is scheduled to begin in the spring of 2026. BACKGROUND N/A DISCUSSION As is typical on projects in MnDOT Right of Way, a cooperative agreement is required to be entered into with the local agency which outlines maintenance responsibilities of the improvements. In this case, only the trails being constructed within Chanhassen are part of the city's maintenance 184 responsibilities, which is typically the case. The attached cooperative agreement is a first draft, but MnDOT will require the agreement be fully executed before award of the construction contract. Therefore, the ask is for the City Council to approve that the city will execute the agreement once it is finalized. The final form of the agreement will be detailed out between MnDOT and city staff. Municipal consent is a standard MnDOT process done for MnDOT projects within municipal boundaries that are acquiring right-of-way. For this project, the only right-of-way in Chanhassen being obtained is from the University of Minnesota Arboretum, and said acquisition has already occurred. Therefore, the County is asking the city that the public hearing portion of municipal consent be waived. The Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) is also a standard process when one agency is leading the implementation of a project and is doing work for the other agency. In this case, Carver County is the lead agency for the Highway 5 project and therefore the JPA is between them and the city. The JPA outlines roles, responsibilities, and cost share. Chanhassen's cost share for the Highway 5 project is limited only to a 50/50 split for the pedestrian underpass on Highway 41, just north of West 78th Street. The rest of the entire Highway 5 project is covered by other non-city funding sources. The pedestrian underpass project will be an entirely separate contract from the Highway 5 project, but will be constructed concurrently. It is currently in the final design phase. A separate JPA will be developed with Carver County in the near future for the underpass project. BUDGET Costs associated with the Highway 5 project are included in the city's 5-year Capital Improvement Program. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approving the three items. ATTACHMENTS RESOLUTION 2025-XX Hwy 5 MnDOT Cooperative Agreement RESOLUTION 2025-XX Hwy 5 Municipal Consent Waiver Hwy 5 JPA with Carver County DRAFT - MnDOT 1058994 COOP AGR Carver Co-Victoria-Chanhassen 185 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: October 13, 2025 RESOLUTION NO: 2025-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH MnDOT, CARVER COUNTY, CITY OF VICTORIA, AND CITY OF CHANHASSEN RELATED TO THE RECONSTRUCTION OF TRUNK HIGHWAY 5 (TH 5) AND ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS (SP 1002-124, SP 1008-113, SP 010-596-014) WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation (“MnDOT”), the City of Victoria (“Victoria”), and the City of Chanhassen (“Chanhassen”) are partnering with Carver County (“County”) to reconstruct Trunk Highway 5 (TH 5) and associated infrastructure within the cities of Victoria and Chanhassen (“Project”); and WHEREAS, the Project limits include:  TH 5 from 0.08 Miles East of CSAH 11 to 0.29 Miles East of TH 41  TH 41 from 0.33 Miles South of TH 5 to 0.49 Miles North of TH 5  CSAH 13 from 0.05 Miles North of CSAH 18 to 0.39 Miles South of TH 7 ; and WHEREAS, MnDOT, Carver County, Victoria, and Chanhassen have prepared construction plans and specifications for the Project, and MnDOT has reviewed and approved the Project; and WHEREAS, this Cooperative Agreement (“Agreement”) addresses, among other details, construction and maintenance responsibilities of the infrastructure components; and WHEREAS, separate agreements between Carver County and Victoria and Chanhassen will address cost share for the Project, as outlined in those Joint Powers Agreements; and WHEREAS, the current form of the Cooperative Agreement is a DRAFT with a final version to be developed prior to award of the Project by the County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chanhassen City Council does hereby authorize entering into MnDOT Agreement #1058994 with MnDOT for the purposes stated above and authorizes the Public Works Director to act on the city’s behalf to approve the final form of the Agreement. 186 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute all documents necessary to execute the Agreement. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 13th day of October, 2025. ATTEST: Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 187 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: October 13, 2025 RESOLUTION NO: 2025-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: RESOLUTION WAIVING A PUBLIC HEARING PRIOR TO MUNICIPAL CONSENT FOR THE TRUNK HIGHWAY (TH) 5 PROJECT WHEREAS, Carver County working on behalf of the Minnesota Department of Transportation have prepared a Final Layout for State Project 1002-124 on TH 5, extending from approximately 0.08 Miles East of CSAH 11 to 0.29 Miles East of TH 41, to implement expressway expansion improvements (the “Project”), and now seek municipal consent as outlined in Minnesota Statutes §§ 161.162 to 161.167; and WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen (“City”), Carver County, and the Minnesota Department of Transportation (“MnDOT”) share responsibility for planning and developing a safe and functional multimodal transportation system within their respective jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, and MnDOT have collaborated since 2019, completing the Arboretum Area Transportation Plan in 2021, and have continued to work closely together throughout the development of the Project; and WHEREAS, the Final Layout for the Project is on file at the Carver County Public Works office in Cologne, Minnesota, identified as Layout No. 1C, S.P. 1002-124, from RP 038+01.005 to RP 041+00.297; and WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the Final Layout and determined that it aligns with the jointly developed project and has minimal impact within city limits. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council that the City of Chanhassen agrees to have waived the public hearing component of municipal consent at the request of Carver County and MnDOT; and does not disapprove of the Final Layout for the Project within the corporate limits of the City. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 13th day of October, 2025. ATTEST: Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor 188 YES NO ABSENT 189 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION ON TRUNK HIGHWAY 5 and TRUNK HIGHWAY 41 THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION ON TRUNK HIGHWAY 5 and TRUNK HIGHWAY 41, ("Agreement") shall be in effect from the date of execution and shall continue until the completion of the Project, by and between the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”), and the County of Carver, a governmental and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota ("County") (each sometimes hereinafter called "Party" and both sometimes collectively "Parties"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, each of the Parties has the authority to construct, maintain, repair, and improve public streets within their respective jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, Trunk Highway 5 (TH 5) and Trunk Highway 41 (TH 41) are duly dedicated public streets, partially located within the corporate limits of City; and WHEREAS, Trunk Highway 5 (TH 5) and Trunk Highway 41 (TH 41) are State Highways under the full jurisdiction of the Minnesota Department of Transportation; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to undertake a joint project and cooperate with another to reconstruct a segment of Trunk Highway 5 (TH 5) and Trunk Highway 41 (TH 41) located within the City, including bridge construction, grading, aggregate base, bituminous and concrete surfacing, curb and gutter, sidewalk, storm sewer, utilities, and other incidentals (“Project”), and to share the costs of the Project as herein provided; and WHEREAS, the County has entered into a separate agreement with the City of Victoria concerning areas of the Project outside the corporate limits of City. WHEREAS, the authority of the Parties to enter into this Agreement is provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants of each to the other contained in this Agreement and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto do covenant and agree as follows: ARTICLE I THE AGREEMENT Section 1.01. Purposes. The purpose of this Agreement is to define the rights and obligations of the City and the County with respect to the Project and the sharing of the costs of the Project. Section 1.02. Cooperation. The City and the County shall cooperate and use their best efforts to ensure the most expeditious implementation of the various provisions of this Agreement. 190 Page | 2 The Parties agree in good faith to undertake resolution of disputes, if any, in an equitable and timely manner. The Project will be open to inspection of duly authorized representatives of the Parties at any time during normal business hours and as often as reasonably deemed necessary. Section 1.03. Relationship To Other Contracts. The City and the County acknowledge that the Contract Documents will be entered into by the County on behalf of the Parties with respect to the Project, and that Change Orders or other documents may be entered into by the County on behalf of the Parties, with respect to the Project. This Agreement shall be construed so as to give the fullest effect to its provisions, consistent with the provisions of the other contracts and documents referred to above. Section 1.04. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be for a period commencing on the date hereof and terminating on the date the Project is completed, accepted by the Parties and all amounts owed by one Party to the other have been paid in full. Section 1.05. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct as of the date hereof and constitute a part of this Agreement. Section 1.06 Enabling Authority. Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, authorizes two or more governmental units to jointly exercise any power common to the contracting Parties. ARTICLE II DEFINITIONS Section 2.01. Definitions. In this Agreement the following terms shall have the following meanings unless the context requires otherwise: (a) Agreement: this Agreement, as it may be amended, supplemented, or restated from time to time. (b) Change Order: a work change order to the Contractor approved in writing, which may be electronic, by both Parties hereto and signed by the County Representative on behalf of the Parties authorizing a change in the work included within the Contract Documents and/or an adjustment in the price and/or an adjustment in the construction schedule, issued after execution of the contract for the construction of the Project. (c) City: the City of Chanhassen. (d) City Representative: Charles Howley, PE, Public Works Director/City Engineer (e) City Costs: the direct and indirect costs of City employees performing services on behalf of the Project, and other incidentals. (f) Construction Phase Professional Services Costs: the fees and costs for all professional services performed in Construction Phase Activities for the Project. 191 Page | 3 (g) Contract Documents: drawings; Engineers Estimate; specifications; general and special conditions; addenda, if any; Change Orders; and the construction contract for the Project; approved by the Parties, or their respective representatives. (h) Contractor: the person or entity that is awarded the contract for the construction of the Project. (i) County: Carver County. (j) County Costs: the direct and indirect costs of County employees performing services on behalf of the Project, and other incidentals. (j) County Representative: Lyndon Robjent, P.E., Carver County Engineer. (k) Design Phase Professional Services Costs: the fees and costs for all professional services performed in Design Phase Activities for the Project. (l) Engineers Estimate: the professional engineer’s opinion of probable cost prior to the bidding of the Project, which encompasses all projected costs tabulated for each Party. (m) Project: bridge construction, grading, aggregate base, bituminous and concrete surfacing, curb and gutter, sidewalk, storm sewer, utilities, retaining wall, noise wall and other incidentals. (n) Project Costs: all costs for and associated with the construction of the Project, excluding Design Phase Professional Services Costs, Construction Phase Professional Services Costs, and City/County Costs. (o) Project Location: TH 5 from 80th Street to Century Boulevard, TH 41 from Water Tower Place to north of 78th Street, as generally depicted in Exhibit A. (p) Uncontrollable Circumstances: the occurrence or non-occurrence of acts or events beyond the reasonable control of the Party relying thereon, and not the result of willful or negligent action or inaction of the Party claiming the event as an Uncontrollable Circumstance, that materially adversely affects the performance of the Party claiming the event as an Uncontrollable Circumstance including but not limited to the following: (1) Acts of God, including, but not limited to floods, ice storms, blizzards, tornadoes, landslides, lighting and earthquakes (but not including reasonably anticipated weather conditions for the geographic area), riots insurrections, war or civil disorder affecting the performance of work, blockades, power or other utility failure, and fires or explosions. 192 Page | 4 (2) The adoption of or change in any federal, state, or local laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, permits, or licenses, or changes in the interpretation of such laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, permits, or licenses by a court or public agency having appropriate jurisdiction after the date of the execution of this Agreement. (3) A suspension, termination, interruption, denial, or failure of renewal of any permit, license, consent, authorization, or approval essential to the construction of the Project. (4) Orders and/or judgment of any federal, state, or local court, administrative agency, or governmental body, provided, however, that the contesting in good faith by such Party of any such order and/or judgment shall not constitute or be construed to constitute a willful or negligent action or inaction of such Party. (5) Strikes or other such labor disputes shall not be considered an Uncontrollable Circumstance, unless such strike or labor dispute involves persons with whom the Parties have no employment relationship and the Parties, or either of them, cannot, using best efforts, obtain substitute performance. ARTICLE III ALLOCATION OF DUTIES Section 3.01. Design Phase Activities. Concept and design phase activities, including, but not limited to, field surveys, right of way plats, design, engineering, right of way acquisition, and other matters, shall be completed by the Parties as follows: See attached Exhibit B – Allocation of Duties Section 3.02. Construction Phase Activities. Construction phase activities, including, but not limited to, the bid process, preparation of contract documents, awarding of contract, construction inspection and surveying and other matters, shall be completed by the Parties as follows: See attached Exhibit B – Allocation of Duties Section 3.03. Contract Award. The Contract Documents shall be approved in writing, which may be electronic, by the Parties prior to the solicitation of bids. In accordance with the applicable provisions of Minnesota Statutes, County will cause bids to be received by it for the construction of the Project and, subject to approval by the City if the low responsible bidder is more than the Engineers Estimate for the City’s cost share, shall award the contract for the construction of the Project to the lowest responsible bidder. County will require that the City be added as an additional insured by endorsement to the Contract for the Project. Section 3.04. Project Construction. Subject to Uncontrollable Circumstances, the Parties shall cause the Project to be constructed in accordance with the Contract Documents. The City shall 193 Page | 5 have the right to review and approve of any proposed changes to the plans and specifications as they relate to City’s cost participation prior to the work being performed. Section 3.05. Maintenance Upon Project Completion and Final Acceptance. Highway maintenance shall be completed by the Parties, upon project completion and final acceptance of the Project, as follows: The Parties agree to perform highway maintenance responsibilities that are consistent with the Carver County Cost Participation Policy, Maintenance Section, as shown in Exhibit D, unless superseded by a separate highway maintenance agreement between the Parties. The City will perform all maintenance responsibilities on all streets under the City jurisdiction. ARTICLE IV PROJECT COST SHARING Section 4.01. Allocation. (a) The Project Costs for all items shall be divided between the City and County as follows: See attached Exhibit C – Project Cost Sharing (b) The Design Phase Professional Services Costs for all items shall be divided between the Parties as follows: See attached Exhibit C – Project Cost Sharing (c) The Construction Phase Professional Services Costs for all items shall be divided between the Parties as follows: See attached Exhibit C – Project Cost Sharing (d) All other costs including, but not limited to City/County Costs, shall be allocated between the Parties as follows: See attached Exhibit C – Project Cost Sharing Section 4.02. Payments to Contractor. The County shall make partial progress payments to the Contractor and, upon approval of both Parties hereto, the final payment to the Contractor in accordance with the Contract Documents. The designated City Representative shall have the right to approve of any Change Orders prepared by the County that affect the City’s share of the construction cost. The City further agrees that it will participate in the settlement of any claim from the County's contractor for the Project that involve delays attributable to unreasonable delays in approval by the City for plan or specification changes deemed necessary by the County Engineer or staff. The amount of the City’s participation in any such claim shall be commensurate with the percentage of delay directly attributable to City’s actions. Section 4.03. Adjustments and Reconciliation. To the extent that the actual value of any item included in an invoice cannot be accurately determined at the time of submission of the 194 Page | 6 invoice, such item shall be invoiced on an estimated basis and an adjustment shall be made to reflect the difference between such estimated amount and the actual amount of such item on the next invoice after determination of the actual amount. Prior to final acceptance of the Project, the designated County representative shall provide City with a reconciliation of all costs for the Project and the respective contributions of the Parties for the review and approval of the Parties. Section 4.04. Exclusive Responsibility. All aspects of application for State and Federal Funds and the grant thereof by the State or Federal government, are the exclusive responsibility of the County, including but not limited to the investment, expenditure, and allocation of such funds. It is specifically agreed that any interest on the investment of any such funds is the sole property of the County, to use as the County shall see fit. Section 4.05. Payment to County. The City agrees to reimburse the County for costs incurred, pursuant to Section 4.01. Unless previously deposited as provided herein, the City is responsible to pay these monies to the County within thirty (30) days of being invoiced for costs incurred or services performed. Costs will be invoiced monthly and upon final acceptance of the Project by the Parties, unless an alternate schedule is mutually agreed upon in writing by the authorized representatives of the Parties. Section 4.06. Payment to City. The County agrees to reimburse the City for costs incurred, pursuant to Section 4.01. The County is responsible to pay these monies to the City within thirty (30) days of being invoiced for costs incurred or services performed. Costs will be invoiced monthly and upon final acceptance of the Project by the Parties, unless an alternate schedule is mutually agreed upon in writing by the authorized representatives of the Parties. ARTICLE V GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 5.01. Notices. All notices or communications required or permitted pursuant to this Agreement shall be either hand delivered or mailed to City and County, certified mail, return- receipt requested, at the following address: City: Charles Howley, PE Public Works Director / City Engineer City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 County: Lyndon Robjent, PE County Engineer Carver County Public Works 11360 Hwy 212 West, Suite 1 Cologne, MN 55322 195 Page | 7 Either Party may change its address or authorized representative by written notice delivered to the other Party pursuant to this Section 5.01. Section 5.02. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in more than one counterpart, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which taken together shall be deemed a single instrument. Section 5.03. Survival of Terms, Representations and Warranties. The representations, warranties, covenants, and agreements of the Parties under this Agreement, and the remedies of either Party for the breach of such representations, warranties, covenants, and agreements by the other Party shall survive the execution and termination of this Agreement. The terms of Sections 3.05, 5.14, 5.15, 5.16 and 5.17 shall survive the expiration, termination or withdrawal from this Agreement. Section 5.04. Non-Assignability. Neither the City nor the County shall assign any interest in this Agreement nor shall transfer any interest in the same, whether by subcontract, assignment or novation, without the prior written consent of the other Party. Such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Section 5.05. Alteration. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the Parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this Agreement are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement. Any alteration, variation, modification or waiver of the provisions of the Agreement shall be valid only after it has been reduced to writing and duly signed by all Parties. Section 5.06. Waiver. The waiver of any of the rights and/or remedies arising under the terms of this Agreement on any one occasion by any Party hereto shall not constitute a waiver or any rights and/or remedies in respect to any subsequent breach or default of the terms of this Agreement. The rights and remedies provided or referred to under the terms of this Agreement are cumulative and not mutually exclusive. Section 5.07. Severability. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any paragraph, section, subdivision, sentence, clause or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held to be contrary to law, or contrary to any rule or regulation having the force and effect of law, such decision shall not affect the remaining portions of this Agreement. Section 5.08. Interpretation According to Minnesota Law. The Laws of the State of Minnesota shall apply to this Agreement. Section 5.09. Final Payment. Before final payment is made to the Contractor, the Contractor shall provide a certificate of compliance from the Commissioner of Revenue certifying that the Contractor and any out-of-state subcontractors have complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 290.92. Section 5.10. Headings. The headings to the various sections of this Agreement are 196 Page | 8 inserted only for convenience of reference and are not intended, nor shall they be construed, to modify, define, limit, or expand the intent of the Parties as expressed in this Agreement. Section 5.11. Further Actions. The Parties agree to execute such further documents and take such further actions as may reasonably be required or expedient to carry out the provisions and intentions of this Agreement, or any agreement or document relating hereto or entered into in connection herewith. Section 5.12. Parties in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure solely to the benefit of the Parties hereto and their permitted assigns, and nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to confer upon any other person any rights or remedies of any nature under or by reason of this Agreement. Section 5.13. Employees. It is further agreed that any and all full-time employees of County and all other employees of said County engaged in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the County shall be considered employees of County only and not of City and that any and all claims that may or might arise under Workman’s Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third Parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of County employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of County. It is further agreed that any and all full-time employees of City and all other employees of said City engaged in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by City shall be considered employees of City only and not of County and that any and all claims that may or might arise under Workman’s Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third Parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said City employees which so engaged on any of the work or services to be rendered herein shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of City. Section 5.14. Indemnification. The Parties’ total liability under this Agreement shall be governed by Minn. Statutes, Section 471.59, Subd. 1a. Each Party agrees that it will be responsible for the acts or omissions of its officials, agents, and employees, and the results thereof, in carrying out the terms of this Agreement, to the extent authorized by law and shall not be responsible for the acts/omissions of the other Party and the results thereof. For purposes of determining total liability for damages, the participating governmental units are considered to be a single governmental unit, the total liability of which shall not exceed the limits for a single governmental unit as provided in Minn. Statutes, Section 466.04, Subd. 1. Each Party agrees to defend, hold harmless, and indemnify the other Party, its officials, agents, and employees, from any liability, loss, or damages the other Party may suffer or incur as the result of demands, claims, judgments, or cost arising out of or caused by the indemnifying Party’s negligence in the performance of its respective obligations under this Agreement. This 197 Page | 9 provision shall not be construed nor operate as a waiver of any applicable limitation of liability, defenses, immunities, or exceptions by statute or common law. To the full extent permitted by law, actions by the Parties pursuant to this Agreement are intended to be and shall be construed as a "cooperative activity" and it is the intent of the Parties that they shall be deemed a "single governmental unit" for the purposes of liability, all as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, Subd. la(a); provided further that for purposes of that statute, each Party to this Agreement expressly declines responsibility for the acts or omissions of the other Party. The Parties of this Agreement are not liable for the acts or omissions of the other participants to this Agreement except to the extent to which they have agreed in writing to be responsible for acts or omissions of the other Parties. Section 5.15. Records – Availability and Access A. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 16C.05, Subd. 5, the City agrees that the County, the State Auditor, or any of their duly authorized representatives at any time during normal business hours and as often as they may reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any books, documents, papers, records, etc., which are pertinent to the accounting practices and procedures of the City and involve transactions relating to this Agreement. City agrees to maintain these records for a period of six years from the date of termination of this Agreement. B. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 16C.05, Subd. 5, the County agrees that the City, the State Auditor, or any of their duly authorized representatives at any time during normal business hours and as often as they may reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any books, documents, papers, records, etc., which are pertinent to the accounting practices and procedures of the County and involve transactions relating to this Agreement. County agrees to maintain these records for a period of six years from the date of termination of this Agreement. Section 5.16. Data Practices. Each Party, its employees, agents, owners, partners, and subcontractors agree to abide by the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 and implementing regulations, if applicable, and all other applicable state and federal laws, rules, regulations and orders relating to data privacy or confidentiality, and as any of the same may be amended. Section 5.17. Nondiscrimination. During the performance of this Agreement, the City and the County agree to the following: No person shall, on the grounds of race, color, religion, age, sex, disability, marital status, public assistance status, criminal record, creed or national origin be excluded from full employment right in, participation in, be denied the benefits of or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any and all applicable Federal and State laws against 198 Page | 10 discrimination. Section 5.18. Default and Withdrawal. Default in this Agreement may occur when a Party fails to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement or so fails to administer the work as to endanger the performance of the Agreement. Unless the Party’s default is excused by the non-defaulting Party, the non-defaulting Party may, upon written notice to the defaulting Party representative listed herein, cancel this Agreement in its entirety as indicated below. Any Party may withdraw from this Agreement with or without cause by providing thirty (30) days’ prior written notice to the other Parties herein. Only the governing bodies of the Participating Parties have authority to act pursuant to this provision of the Agreement. Each Party to this agreement reserves the right to withdraw from and cancel this agreement within 30 days from the opening of bids for the project in the event either or both Parties consider any or all bids unsatisfactory; the withdrawal from or cancellation of the agreement to be accomplished by either or both Parties within 30 days of opening of bids by serving a written notice thereof upon the other, unless this right is waived by both Parties in writing. Section 5.19. Third Party. This Agreement does not create any rights, claims or benefits inuring to any person that is not a Party hereto nor create or establish any third Party beneficiary. 199 Page | 11 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, The Parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed. City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Mayor Date: Attest: City Manager Date: County of Carver, Minnesota County Board Chair Date: Attest: County Administrator Date: Approved As To Form: County Attorney Date: 200 UniversityOf MinnesotaLandscape Arboretum Carver ParkReserve MinnewashtaRegionalPark SchutzLake LakeMinnetonka LakeMinnewashtaLakeMinnetonkaRegionalTrail ChurchLakeBoule vard R o l lingAcresR o a d Victoria Dr i veBavar i aRoadGalpinBoulevardÆÿ15 Æÿ18 Æÿ11 Æÿ18 Æÿ43 111 !(7!(7 !(41 !(41 !(5 !(5 Chanhassen Laketown Township Chaska Project Location Map This map was created using a compilation of information and data from various City, County, State, and Federal offices. It is not a surveyed or legally recorded map and is intended to be used as a reference. Carver County is not responsible for any inaccuracies contained herein.1 inch = 4,000 feet Public Works Division11360 Hwy 212, Suite 1Cologne, MN 55322(952) 466-5200Created: 8/30/2024 Project Location End of Project Exhibit A Beginning of Project Victoria A r b o r e tu m Boulevard HazeltineBoulevard201 TRUNK HIGHWAY 5 and TRUNK HIGHWAY 41 Project Exhibit B – Allocation of Duties Design Phase Activities County will complete all concept and design phase activities of the Project and procure necessary Design Phase Professional Services. The County shall notify the City, no later than fourteen (14) days prior to county board action to approve of eminent domain, if the land acquisition for the Project cannot be acquired by direct purchase. City does not object to the County, subject to authorization from its County Board, from acquiring any land that cannot be acquired by direct purchase through the eminent domain process under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 117. Subject to authorization from its County Board, City does not object to the County exercising the power of eminent domain related to the Project in the County’s name. The County shall not exercise the power of eminent domain related to the Project in the City’s name. Construction Phase Activities County will complete all construction phase activities of the Project and procure necessary Construction Phase Professional Services. County shall include the requirement in the contract documents that the City shall solely operate existing City water valves, not the Project Contractor. All City utility testing shall be subject to City review and approval prior to acceptance of the City’s public utilities installed as part of the Project. 202 TRUNK HIGHWAY 5 and TRUNK HIGHWAY 41 Project Exhibit C – Project Cost Sharing The County and City agree that items not specifically covered by this agreement will be cost shared by the parties in accordance with the current version of the Carver County Cost Participation Policy, for a Conventional Project, which is attached hereto as Exhibit D. County and City agree to cost share as follows: Project Costs The County and City agree to cost share Project Costs in accordance with the Carver County Cost Participation Policy (Exhibit D) and augmented by the following: 1. It is mutually agreed by the Parties that the following funding that has been secured will be used to lower the Parties shares in project costs. a. $25,000,000 from the RURAL program for the project b. $20,000,000 in State of Minnesota General Funds for the project c. $10,800,000 from Minnesota Freight Investment Program d. $10,000,000 in Regional Solicitation for Expansion of TH 5 near Rolling Acres Road e. $10,000,000 in PROTECT funds for the TH 5 Causeway area f. $7,000,000 in Regional Solicitation for Modernization of TH 5 and TH 41 intersection g. $7,000,000 in Congressionally Directed Spending for the project h. $5,800,000 MnDOT commitment for TH 5 improvements i. $5,300,000 from states IIJA match program for the project j. $2,000,000 in Regional Solicitation for Pedestrian Overpass near 78th Street in Victoria k. $2,000,000 in Congressionally Directed Spending for TH 5 Preliminary Design l. $1,000,000 in Local Partnership Project (LPP) funds for the TH 5 and TH 41 intersection m. $500,000 MnDOT commitment for preliminary design n. $250,000 from DNR Local Trails Program for the Bavaria Road trail. 2. The Parties agree that Exhibit E is an accurate graphical depiction of the Project cost sharing, which indicates no City costs other than the TH41 Pedestrian Underpass. 3. The City agrees to transfer property or grant easement rights to the County of City owned property needed for the Project at no cost to the County as shown in Exhibit G. 4. The City agrees to pay for all City requested improvements that may be added to the Project during construction, that the County does not deem necessary to carry out the scope of the Project. The Engineers Estimate and any Change Orders will show such City requested improvement costs for City approval. 5. The County pays for standard median design which is plain concrete. If the City requests decorative median, the City shall pay the additional cost above the cost of a standard median. 203 TH 41 Pedestrian Underpass The City and County acknowledge that pedestrian improvements originally proposed at West 78th Street were not supported by the State of Minnesota for inclusion in the Project. In response, the City and County mutually commit to the development of a standalone pedestrian crossing project north of West 78th Street. The standalone project will be designed and delivered in a coordinated manner with the Project, leveraging planned road closures to optimize construction efficiency and minimize public disruption. The standalone project will be developed to ensure independent utility and will be scoped to facilitate a grade-separated pedestrian crossing. The total estimated cost of this standalone project is $2.5 million, based on current conceptual estimates. The City and County agree to share this cost equally (50/50). Specific design, funding, and delivery details will be formalized in a separate agreement or amendment, as appropriate, once further project development has occurred. This commitment is made in good faith and is intended to ensure continued collaboration and alignment with the broader goals of the Highway 5 corridor improvements. Other Costs The County and City agree to cost share Other Costs in accordance with the Carver County Cost Participation Policy (Exhibit D) and augmented by the following: 1. The County and City agree to not bill the other Party for direct and/or indirect internal staff costs for the Project to support the administration of the Project. 204 Exhibit D – Carver County Cost Policy 205 Page 1 of 5 Carver County Highway Cost Participation Policy – Adopted March 19, 2013 CCaarrvveerr CCoouunnttyy DDiivviissiioonn ooff PPuubblliicc WWoorrkkss COST PARTICIPATION POLICY Applicable to Cooperative Highway Projects between Carver County and Municipalities. Adopted by the Carver County Board of Commissioners on February 17, 1998. Amended by the Carver County Board of Commissioners on February 13, 2007, and March 19, 2013. A. Construction Cost Share – Conventional Project (Projects programmed in the County 5-year CIP.) Project Items County Share Municipality Share Note Right of Way By Negotiation By Negotiation 1 Retaining Wall in lieu of right of way Same %age as R/W Same %age as R/W Clearing and Grubbing 100% 0% Grading 100% 0% 2 Aggregate Base and Surfacing 100% 0% 3 Parking Lanes on 4-lane or 6-lane road 0% 100% 4 Storm Sewer and Ponds/Treatment Basins %age of Contributing Flow %age of Contributing Flow 5 Culverts 100% 0% Concrete Sidewalk 0%>5000 Population 50%<5000 Population 100%>5000 Population 50%<5000 Population 6 Concrete Curb and Gutter and Pedestrian Ramps 0%>5000 Population 50%<5000 Population 100%>5000 Population 50%<5000 Population 7 Concrete Median and Median Curb 100% 0% 8 Concrete Driveway Entrances (Apron) 100% 0% 9 Municipal Utility Adjustment or Construction 0% 100% Roundabouts By Leg By Leg Traffic Signals By Leg By Leg 10 Intersection Lighting By Leg By Leg 11 Street Lighting 0% 100% 12 Bridges By Negotiation By Negotiation Trails along county highway 0% Local 50% Linking & Regional 100% Destination 100% Local 50% Linking & Regional 0% Destination 13 Trail Underpass/Overpass 0% Local 50% Linking & Regional 100% Destination 100% Local 50% Linking & Regional 0% Destination 14 Landscaping 25% up to State Aid Limit 75% 15 Aesthetic Treatments 0% 100% 16 Highway Signs 100% 0% Electronic/Specialty Signs By Negotiation By Negotiation Noise Walls By Negotiation By Negotiation 17 Mobilization Pro-rated by const. share Pro-rated by const. share Erosion Control Pro-rated by const. share Pro-rated by const. share Traffic Control Pro-rated by const. share Pro-rated by const. share Engineering Services Pro-rated by const. share Pro-rated by const. share Other items By Negotiation By Negotiation 206 Page 2 of 5 Carver County Highway Cost Participation Policy – Adopted March 19, 2013 CCaarrvveerr CCoouunnttyy DDiivviissiioonn ooff PPuubblliicc WWoorrkkss Conventional Project Notes 1. Fee title and permanent and temporary easements needed for projects on the existing county highway system or newly established or dedicated county highway system including the property needed for storm water treatment basins and wetland mitigation sites. 2. Includes grading and removal items. Applies to county roads and work necessary to tie in existing public street approaches. Enhancements to public streets approaches are the responsibility of the municipality. New public or private street approaches are the responsibility of the municipality. 3. Applies to county roads and work necessary to tie in existing public street approaches. Enha ncements to public streets approaches are the responsibility of the municipality. New public or private street approaches are the responsibility of the municipality. 4. Includes grading, base and surfacing. Applies to county roads and work necessary to tie in existing public street approaches. Enhancements to public streets approaches are the responsibility of the municipality. New public or private street approaches are the responsibility of the municipality. 5. Includes catch basins, manholes, storm sewer pipes, outlet structures, grit chambers, and water quality and rate control ponds/basins. The county share is based on the ratio of contributing flow from the right of way to the total contributing flow. 6. Existing sidewalk impacted by the highway construction will be replaced in kind by the county. 7. Existing curb and gutter and pedestrian ramps impacted by the highway construction will be replaced in kind by the county. 8. The county pays for standard median design which is plain concrete . If a municipality requests decorative median the municipality pays the additional cost above the cost of a standard median. 9. Concrete aprons are installed at locations determined by the county. Driveways beyond the apron are constructed in -kind. 10. Applies to new and replacement traffic signals. Includes all components that make up a permanent warranted traffic control signal system with steel poles and mast arms installed at an intersection of a county highway and public roadway at an approved location by the county. The county pays 0% of a signal system at a private access/road. The municipality pays 100% of the furnishing and maintenance of electrical power to the traffic signal. The cost to modify, update or completely reconstruct the signal system will be shared at the same percentage as the original installation. 11. Designed to light an intersection for traffic safety purposes. Locations will be determined by the county. 12. Decorative type lighting along the roadway. 13. Applies to trails constructed with county road projects only. Stand alone trail projects are handled separately. Locations and descriptions are shown in the Carver County Comprehensive Plan and other related trail plans and policy documents. Applies to all costs associated with trail including but not limited to: grading, drainage, base, surfacing, pedestrian ramps, wetland mitigation due to trail impacts and additional right way needed for the trail. The county will only participate in trails constructed to meet State Aid Rules and Standards. Costs for major rehabilitation or replacement will be shared at the same percentage as the original installation. Townships are exempt from paying for trails. 14. Underpasses spanning 10 feet or more are considered bridges and will be added to the county bridge safety inspectio n program. 15. Landscaping items as approved by the county. State Aid limit is 5% of annual construction allotment. 16. Aesthetic items that do not serve a specific transportation use such as streetscaping, median plantings, decorative railing, ornamental fencing etc. All approved median plantings require irrigation. 17. Additional costs for decorative noise walls will be the responsibility of the requesting agency. 207 Page 3 of 5 Carver County Highway Cost Participation Policy – Adopted March 19, 2013 CCaarrvveerr CCoouunnttyy DDiivviissiioonn ooff PPuubblliicc WWoorrkkss B. Construction Cost Share – Development Driven Project (Projects not programmed in the County 5-year CIP) Project Items County Share Municipality Share Note Right of Way 0% 100% 1 Retaining Wall in lieu of right of way Same %age as R/W Same %age as R/W Clearing and Grubbing 100% 0% Grading 100% for through lane and shoulder (up to 44’ wide). 50% for additional through lanes and median. 100% for county rd. to county rd. turn lanes. 0% for through lane and shoulder (up to 44’ wide). 50% for additional through lanes and median. 100% for city st. to county rd. turn lanes and county rd. to city st. turn lanes 2 Aggregate Base and Surfacing Same as Grading Same as Grading Parking Lanes on 4-lane or 6-lane road 0% 100% 3 Storm Sewer and Ponds/Treatment Basins %age of Contributing Flow %age of Contributing Flow 4 Culverts 100% 0% Concrete Sidewalk 0% 100% Concrete Curb and Gutter and Pedestrian Ramps 0% 100% Concrete Median and Median Curb 50% 50% 5 Concrete Driveway Entrances (Apron) 100% 0% 6 Municipal Utility Adjustment or Construction 0% 100% Roundabouts By Leg if meets warrants by opening. By Leg up to 50% if meets warrants for design year. 0% if does not meet warrants for design year. By Leg if meets warrants by opening. By Leg but no less than 50% if meets warrants for design year. 100% if does not meet warrants for design year. Traffic Signals By Leg if meets warrants by opening. 50% of County Legs if meets warrants for design year. 0% if does not meet warrants for design year. By Leg if meets warrants by opening. 100% of City legs plus 50% of County Legs if meets warrants for design year. 100% if does not meet warrants for design year. 7 Intersection Lighting By Leg By Leg 8 Street Lighting 0% 100% 9 Bridges By Negotiation By Negotiation 208 Page 4 of 5 Carver County Highway Cost Participation Policy – Adopted March 19, 2013 CCaarrvveerr CCoouunnttyy DDiivviissiioonn ooff PPuubblliicc WWoorrkkss Trails along county highway 0% Local 50% Linking & Regional 100% Destination 100% Local 50% Linking & Regional 0% Destination 10 Pedestrian Underpass/Overpass 0% 100% 11 Landscaping 0% 100% 12 Aesthetic Treatments 0% 100% 13 Highway Signs 100% 0% Electronic/Specialty Signs By Negotiation By Negotiation Noise Walls 0% 100% 14 Mobilization Pro-rated by const. share Pro-rated by const. share Erosion Control Pro-rated by const. share Pro-rated by const. share Traffic Control Pro-rated by const. share Pro-rated by const. share Engineering Services Pro-rated by const. share Pro-rated by const. share Other items By Negotiation By Negotiation Development Driven Project Notes 1. Fee title and permanent and temporary easements needed for projects on the existing county highway system or newly established or dedicated county highway system including the property needed for storm water treatment basins and wetland mitigation sites. The cost share for right of way needed outside the boundaries of a development plat will be negotiated. 2. Includes grading and removal items. Enhancements to public streets approaches are the responsibility of the municipality. New public or private street approaches are the responsibility of the municipality. 3. Includes grading, base and surfacing. Applies to county roads and work necessary to tie in exist ing public street approaches. Enhancements to public streets approaches are the responsibility of the municipality. New public or private street approaches are the responsibility of the municipality. 4. Includes catch basins, manholes, storm sewer pipes, outlet structures, grit chambers, and water quality and rate control ponds/basins. The county share is based on the ratio of contributing flow. County share is based on the contributing flow from the right of way less roadway surface areas that the municipality pays for. The municipality share is the contributing flow from outside the right of way plus roadway surface area the municipality pays for. Costs to replace elements of storm sewer systems will be shared at the same percentage as the original installation. 5. The county pays for standard median design which is plain concrete. If a municipality requests decorative median the municipality pays the additional cost above the cost of a standard median. 6. Concrete aprons are installed at locations determined by the county. Driveways beyond the apron are constructed in-kind. 7. Applies to new and replacement traffic signals. Includes all components that make up a permanent warranted traffic control signal system with steel poles and mast arms installed at an intersection of a county highway and public roadway at an approved location by the county. To meet signal warrants, the intersection must meet either the four hour or the eight hour vehicular volume warrant standard. The county pays 0% of a signal system at a private access/road. The municipality pays 100% of the furnishing and maintenance of electrical power to the traffic signal. The cost to modify, update or completely reconstruct the signal system will be shared at the same percentage as the original installation. 8. Designed to light an intersection for traffic safety purposes. Locations will be determined by the county. 9. Decorative type lighting along the roadway. 10. Applies to trails constructed with county road projects only. Locations and descriptions are shown in the Carver County Comprehensive Plan and other related trail plans and policy documents. Costs associated with trail include grading, drainage , base, surfacing, pedestrian ramps, wetland mitigation due to trail impacts and additional right way needed for the trail. The county will only participate in trails constructed to meet State Aid Rules and Standards. Costs for major rehabilitation or replacement will be shared at the same percentage as the original installation. 11. Underpasses spanning 10 feet or more are considered bridges and will be added to the county bridge safety inspection program. 12. Landscaping items as approved by the county. 13. Aesthetic items that do not serve a specific transportation use such as streetscaping, median plantings, decor ative railing, ornamental fencing etc. All approved median plantings require irrigation. 14. Additional costs for decorative noise walls will be the responsibility of the requesting agency. 209 Page 5 of 5 Carver County Highway Cost Participation Policy – Adopted March 19, 2013 CCaarrvveerr CCoouunnttyy DDiivviissiioonn ooff PPuubblliicc WWoorrkkss C. Maintenance - Maintenance of county highways constructed under this policy will be as follows unless specified differently in a separate maintenance agreement. 1. The county is responsible for maintenance of the county highway between curbs or between outside edges of shoulders. This includes but is not limited to snow and ice control, patching, crack sealing, seal coating, pavement rehabilitation, shouldering, striping and sign replacement. In addition, the county is responsible for routine maintenance outside the edge of shoulder and within the right of way of a rural county highway. The county may enter into agreements with municipalities to perform highway maintenance. 2. The municipality is responsible for maintenance of the boulevard, landscaped median, trees, shrubs, irrigation systems, sidewalk, retaining walls, steps, aesthetic treatments, and other urban appurtenances within the right-of- way of an urban county highway. 3. The county is responsible for maintenance of bridges and culverts on the county route. 4. The municipality is responsible for maintenance of its utilities and storm sewer systems including detention/treatment basins. Costs to replace elements of storm sewer systems will be shared at the same percentage as the original installation. 5. The county is responsible for maintaining roundabouts with the exception of island landscaping and aesthetic treatments which are the responsibility of the municipality. 6. Unless stipulated by special agreement, the county will own and is responsible for maintaining traffic signal systems (with the exception of the attached lighting) at county road intersections with local public roadways and private streets. The municipality is responsible for maintaining the signal lighting and the electrical power to the signal system. The cost to modify, update or completely reconstruct the signal system will be shared at the same percentage as the original installation. 7. The municipality is responsible for maintenance of intersection lighting at a county road and local road intersection. The county is responsible for maintenance of intersect ion lighting at a county road and county road intersection. 8. The municipality is responsible for the maintenance of street lights. 9. The municipality is responsible for maintaining trails within the county highway right-of-way. Costs for major rehabilitation or replacement will be shared at the same percentage as the original installation. 10. The municipality is responsible for maintaining pedestrian underpasses and overpasses. 11. The county is responsible for maintaining highway signs. 12. The county is responsible for maintaining electronic/specialty signs. The costs of maintenance will be shared at the same percentage as the original installation. 13. Maintenance of noise walls is the responsibility of the agency paying for the initial installation. 210 Exhibit E – Cost Split Graphics 211 100% COUNTY 100% CITY 67% COUNTY / 33% CITY 50% COUNTY / 50% CITY LEGEND STANDARD CONCRETE 100% CITY FOR ANY COST ABOVE bmi.tbl4:26:06 PMpdf-color.pltcfgdenaki3/4/2025MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM T H 5PKWYMINNEWASHTATS HT77 LONE CEDAR LNTHE PROJECT. ON THE STATE ROAD/TRUNK HIGHWAY 5 PORTIONS OF LOCAL ROAD RECONSTRUCTION TO TOUCHDOWN POINTS 2. COUNTY PAYS 100% OF ROUNDABOUTS AND 100% FUNDS, AND FEDERAL FUNDS. SALES TAX, COUNTY STATE AID, FEDERAL AID, STATE VARIOUS FUNDING SOURCES INCLUDING COUNTY 1. 100% COUNTY AREAS ARE COVERED WITH NOTES: ACCESS ROAD RELOCATED ARBORETUM TH 5 - COST PARTICIPATION SCALE IN FEET0 200 212 100% COUNTY 100% CITY 67% COUNTY / 33% CITY 50% COUNTY / 50% CITY LEGEND STANDARD CONCRETE 100% CITY FOR ANY COST ABOVE bmi.tbl4:26:12 PMpdf-color.pltcfgdenaki3/4/2025MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM TH 5 C RI MS ON B AY R DDRARBORETUMTHE PROJECT. ON THE STATE ROAD/TRUNK HIGHWAY 5 PORTIONS OF LOCAL ROAD RECONSTRUCTION TO TOUCHDOWN POINTS 2. COUNTY PAYS 100% OF ROUNDABOUTS AND 100% FUNDS, AND FEDERAL FUNDS. SALES TAX, COUNTY STATE AID, FEDERAL AID, STATE VARIOUS FUNDING SOURCES INCLUDING COUNTY 1. 100% COUNTY AREAS ARE COVERED WITH NOTES: CITY OF CHANHASSEN SEPARATE PROJECT BY TH 5 - COST PARTICIPATION SCALE IN FEET0 200 213 100% COUNTY 100% CITY 67% COUNTY / 33% CITY 50% COUNTY / 50% CITY LEGEND STANDARD CONCRETE 100% CITY FOR ANY COST ABOVE 2011 adjustment bmi.tbl4:26:20 PMpdf-color.pltcfgdenaki3/4/2025UNDERPASS TH 5 TH 41L P REWOT RETAW CENTURY BLVDBLVDCENTURYTHE PROJECT. ON THE STATE ROAD/TRUNK HIGHWAY 5 PORTIONS OF LOCAL ROAD RECONSTRUCTION TO TOUCHDOWN POINTS 2. COUNTY PAYS 100% OF ROUNDABOUTS AND 100% FUNDS, AND FEDERAL FUNDS. SALES TAX, COUNTY STATE AID, FEDERAL AID, STATE VARIOUS FUNDING SOURCES INCLUDING COUNTY 1. 100% COUNTY AREAS ARE COVERED WITH NOTES: TH 5 - COST PARTICIPATION SCALE IN FEET0 200 Per early discussions with MnDOT, this underpass is eligible for state funds since it is accommodating bikes and peds at the TH 5/41 intersection area. 214 bmi.tbl4:26:26 PMpdf-color.pltcfgdenaki3/4/2025100% COUNTY 100% CITY 67% COUNTY / 33% CITY 50% COUNTY / 50% CITY LEGEND STANDARD CONCRETE 100% CITY FOR ANY COST ABOVE TH 4178TH ST 78TH ST VILLAGE LNARBORETUMTHE PROJECT. ON THE STATE ROAD/TRUNK HIGHWAY 5 PORTIONS OF LOCAL ROAD RECONSTRUCTION TO TOUCHDOWN POINTS 2. COUNTY PAYS 100% OF ROUNDABOUTS AND 100% FUNDS, AND FEDERAL FUNDS. SALES TAX, COUNTY STATE AID, FEDERAL AID, STATE VARIOUS FUNDING SOURCES INCLUDING COUNTY 1. 100% COUNTY AREAS ARE COVERED WITH NOTES: TH 5 - COST PARTICIPATION SCALE IN FEET0 200 215 ????UM30" RCP 18" RCP24" RCP MM M 18" RCP M M M U T bmi.tblH:\CACO\25X139354000\CAD\ORD\CAC0-25X139354000\Figures\cd1008XXX_lo1_skew.dgn10:15:55 AMpdf-color.pltcfgalexanderre8/6/2025PRELIMINARY LAYOUT TH 41 UNDERPASS 100 SCALE IN FEET PROPOSED BRIDGE/BOX CULVERT 14'X10' BOX CULVERT A/L W 78TH ST EB A/L W 78TH ST WB A/L TH 41 TRAIL UNDERPASS 10' TRAIL10' T RAIL 10' TRAILA/L TH 41 TRAIL A/L TH 41 NB A/L TH 41 SB 96 5 9 7 0 9 7 5 98 0 985 990 995 1000975 98 0 97 0 970 975 9 8 0 9 8 5 9 9 0 99099510001000 1005 1010 1010 990 9951000 9 7 5980 97097596096596520'R20'R 75'R85'R 2372.3'R85' R 1000' R 5 0 0'R500'R 1015 54154204 2 5 415420425 510500505LAYOUT LEGEND PED/BIKE PATH EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PARCEL LINES BOULEVARD/GRASS AREA CONSTRUCTION (BY OTHERS) CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 1:2.51:31:2.5 1 :2 .5 1: 4 1.6% 4.8% 4.85%3.3%3.3%2.1%6.1%2.7%5%4 %1:2.5 1:3 2.95%1:34.85%1:41 :2 .5 1:42.7%990'995'1000'985'990'995' 985' 990' 995'995'1000'1005'995'1000'1000'1005'1010'1000'980' 985' 990' 995'980'985'980'985'975'980'975'980'All work associated with the TH 41 Underpass and Trail to be 50% County / 50% City cost 216 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -1- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND CARVER COUNTY AND CITY OF VICTORIA AND CITY OF CHANHASSEN COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT State Project Number: 1002-124 Trunk Highway Number: 5=121 State Project Number: 1008-113 Trunk Highway Number: 41=12 State Project Numbers: 010-596-014, 010-596-016, 010-613-009 241-020-003, 241-090-001 Federal Project Number: STBG-CDS-RSTG-PRO-NHFP-TA 1025(262) Lighting System Feed Points: 10H1, B, F, H Signal System IDs: 1736241, 22474821, 22474822, 22474823 Total Original State Obligation $6,512,172.68 State SRC (LPP) Funds $712,172.68 State Federal and SRC Match Funds $5,800,000.00 Original Amount Encumbered $6,512,172.68 This Agreement is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Transportation (State), Carver County, acting through it's Board of Commissioners (County), the City of Victoria, acting through its City Council (Victoria), and the City of Chanhassen, acting through its City Council (Chanhassen). Recitals 1. The County will perform grading, bituminous surfacing, roundabouts, ADA improvements, retaining and noise walls, signals, TMS, lighting, pedestrian crosswalk flasher system, and Bridges 10X26, 10X27, 10X28, 10X29, 10J61, 10064, and 10065 construction and other associated construction upon, along, and adjacent to Trunk Highway (TH) 5 from 0.08 miles east of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 11 to 0.29 miles east of TH 41, and on TH 41 from 0.33 miles south of TH 5 to 0.49 miles north of TH 5, and on CSAH 13 from 0.05 miles north of CSAH 18 to 0.39 miles south of TH 7 according to County-prepared plans, specifications, and special provisions designated by the County as State Project (SP) 010-596-014, SP 010-596-016, SP 010-613-009, SP 241-020-003, and SP 241-090-001 and by the State as SP 1002-124 (TH 5=121) and SP 1008-113 (TH 41=12) (Project); and 2. The County requests the State participate in the costs of the grading, bituminous surfacing, roundabout, ADA improvements, retaining and noise walls, signals, TMS, and lighting construction, and the State is willing to participate in the costs of said construction; and 3. Agreement 1060279 between the State and the University of Minnesota will address maintenance for Bridges 10X28 and 10X29, storm sewer, and lighting; and 4. Minnesota Statutes § 161.20, subdivision 2 authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to make arrangements with and cooperate with any governmental authority for the purposes of constructing, maintaining, and improving the trunk highway system. 217 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -2- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal Agreement 1. Term of Agreement; Survival of Terms; Plans; Incorporation of Exhibits 1.1. Effective Date. This Agreement will be effective on the date the State obtains all signatures required by Minnesota Statutes § 16C.05, subdivision 2. 1.2. Expiration Date. This Agreement will expire when all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled. 1.3. Survival of Terms. All clauses which impose obligations continuing in their nature and which must survive in order to give effect to their meaning will survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement, including without limitation, the following clauses: 2.4. State Ownership of Improvements; 5. Maintenance by the County; 6. Maintenance by the City 11. Liability; Worker Compensation Claims; Insurance; 14. State Audits; 15. Government Data Practices; 17. Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Venue; and 19. Force Majeure. The terms and conditions set forth in Article 6. Signal Systems and EVP Systems Operation and Maintenance will survive the expiration of this Agreement, but may be terminated by another agreement between the parties. 1.4. Plans, Specifications, and Special Provisions. State Aid-approved County plans, specifications, and special provisions designated by the County as SP 010-596-014, SP 010-596-016, SP 010-613-009, SP 241-020-003, and SP 241-090-001 and by the State as SP 1002-124 (TH 5=121) and SP 1008-113 (TH 41=12) are on file in the office of the County's Engineer and incorporated into this Agreement by reference (Project Plans). 1.5. Exhibits. The Preliminary Schedule "I" is attached and incorporated into this Agreement. Exhibit A - Drainage Ownership and Maintenance, Exhibit B - Retaining Wall Ownership and Maintenance, Exhibit C - Lighting Maintenance, Exhibit D - Landscaping Maintenance, and Exhibit E – Shared Use Path Maintenance are attached and incorporated into this Agreement. 2. Right-of-Way Use 2.1. Limited Right to Occupy. The State grants to the County (and its contractors and consultants) the right to occupy Trunk Highway Right-of-Way as necessary to perform the work described in the Project Plans. This right is limited to the purpose of constructing the Project, and administering such construction, and may be revoked by the State at any time, with or without cause. Cause for revoking this right of occupancy includes, but is not limited to, breaching the terms of this or any other agreement (relevant to this Project) with the State, failing to provide adequate traffic control or other safety measures, failing to perform the construction properly and in a timely manner, and failing to observe applicable environmental laws or terms of applicable permits. The State will have no liability to the County (or its contractors or consultants) for revoking this right of occupancy. 2.2. State Access; Suspension of Work; Remedial Measures. The State's District Engineer or assigned representative retains the right to enter and inspect the Trunk Highway Right-of-Way (including the construction being performed on such right-of-way) at any time and without notice to the County or its contractor. If the State determines (in its sole discretion) that the construction is not being performed in a proper or timely manner, or that environmental laws (or the terms of permits) are not being complied with, or that traffic control or other necessary safety measures are not being properly implemented, then the State may notify and require the County (and its contractors and consultants) to suspend their operations until the County (and its contractors and consultants) take all necessary actions to rectify the situation to the satisfaction of the State. The State will have no liability to the County (or its contractors or consultants) for exercising or failing to exercise its rights under this provision. 2.3. Traffic Control; Worker Safety. While the County (and its contractors and consultants) are occupying the State's Right-of-Way, they must comply with the approved traffic control plan, and with applicable provisions of the Work Zone Field Handbook 218 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -3- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal (http://www.dot.state.mn.us/trafficeng/workzone/index.html). All County, contractor, and consultant personnel occupying the State's Right-of-Way must be provided with required reflective clothing and hats. 2.4. State Ownership of Improvements. The State will retain ownership of its Trunk Highway Right-of-Way, including any improvements made to such right-of-way under this Agreement, unless otherwise noted. The warranties and guarantees made by the County's contractor with respect to such improvements (if any) will flow to the State. The County will assist the State, as necessary, to enforce such warranties and guarantees, and to obtain recovery from the County's consultants, and contractor (including its sureties) for non-performance of contract work, for design errors and omissions, and for defects in materials and workmanship. Upon request of the State, the County will undertake such actions as are reasonably necessary to transfer or assign contract rights to the State and to permit subrogation by the State with respect to claims against the County's consultants and contractors. 2.5. Utility Relocation. The State authorizes the County to issue Notices and Orders for utility relocation in accordance with Minnesota Statutes §161.45 and Minnesota Rules Part 8810.3100 through 8810.3600. 3. Contract Award and Construction 3.1. Bids and Award. The County will receive bids and award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder (or best value proposer), subject to concurrence by the State in that award, according to the Project Plans. The contract construction will be performed according to the Project Plans. 3.2. Bid Documents Furnished by the County. The County will, within seven days of opening bids for the construction contract, submit to the State Aid Agreement Engineer a copy of the low bid and an abstract of all bids together with the County's request for concurrence by the State in the award of the construction contract. The County will not award the construction contract until the State advises the County in writing of its concurrence. 3.3. Rejection of Bids. The County may reject and the State may require the County to reject any or all bids for the construction contract. The party rejecting or requiring the rejection of bids must provide the other party written notice of that rejection or requirement for rejection no later than 30 days after opening bids. Upon the rejection of all bids, a party may request, in writing, that the bidding process be repeated. Upon the other party's written approval of such request, the County will repeat the bidding process in a reasonable period of time, without cost or expense to the State. 3.4. Contract Terms. The County's contract with its construction contractor(s) must include the following terms: A. A clause making the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Transportation, an intended third-party beneficiary of the contract with respect to the portion of work performed on the State's Right-of-Way; and B. A clause requiring the State to be named as an additional insured on any insurance coverage which the contractor is required to provide; and C. A clause stating that any warranties provided by the contractor, for the work performed on the trunk highway, will flow to, and be enforceable by, the State as the owner of such improvements. 3.5. Direction, Supervision, and Inspection of Construction A. The contract construction will be under the direction of the County; however, the County will utilize the services of a registered professional engineer to be furnished by the State for the Trunk Highway- eligible portion of the Project to perform construction engineering in connection with the contract construction at no cost or expense to the County. For the non-Trunk Highway eligible portion of the Project, the State will charge the County for construction engineering services as described in Article 3.6. Provision of such services will not be deemed to make the State a principal or co-principal 219 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -4- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal with respect to liability regarding the contract construction. The County will give the State Aid Agreements Engineer at Roseville five days' notice of its intention to start the contract construction. B. Responsibility for the control of materials for the contract construction will be on the County and its contractor and will be carried out according to Specifications 1601 through and including 1609 in the State's current Standard Specifications for Construction. 3.6. Performance of Construction Engineering. The State will perform construction inspection and material inspection for the Project's Trunk Highway-eligible construction items without cost or expense to the County. The County will perform construction inspection and material inspection for the Project's non-Trunk Highway-eligible construction items without cost or expense to the State. The State will perform surveys and staking for the entire Project and will invoice the County for those services at a rate of 2 percent of the construction cost share for the Project's non-Trunk Highway-eligible construction items. Construction engineering services provided by the State will be in accordance with the Project Plans in the manner currently used by the State and according to the following: A. The State will provide all labor, equipment, and materials necessary to perform the Project's surveys and staking and the construction inspection and materials inspection for the Trunk Highway-eligible portion of the contract. B. The State’s engineer assigned to the contract construction will perform all surveys and staking for the Project, construction inspection and materials inspection for the Trunk Highway-eligible portion of the Project, and associated documentation. C. At regular intervals after the County's contractor has started the construction, the State will prepare partial estimates of construction costs for the Trunk Highway-eligible construction items according to the terms of the construction contract. Immediately after the preparation of each partial estimate, the State's engineer assigned to the contract construction will submit the partial estimate to the County. The State will also prepare the final construction cost data for the Trunk Highway-eligible construction items and submit that final construction cost data to the County. The County will be responsible for making payments to the contractor based on the partial estimates and final cost certified by the State's engineer. D. County and State concurrence must be obtained before the State authorizes change orders that significantly increase their cost. The County will concur with or object to authorization of additional work within a reasonable amount of time of notification by the State that additional work is deemed necessary. E. All changes in the Project Plans and all addenda and change orders must be approved by the State District Engineer's authorized representative. All changes that result in increased costs to the County must be approved by the County in the manner provided for in its Ordinances enacted pursuant thereto. 3.7. Contaminated Soils and Groundwater within the State's Cost Participation Limits A. 24 Hour Notification. The County will notify the State District Engineer's authorized representative a minimum of 24 hours prior to the contractor beginning the excavation and removal of any contaminated soils that have been identified within the Project limits. B. Immediate Notification. The County will notify the State District Engineer's authorized representative immediately upon the contractor encountering contaminated soils and/or groundwater in areas that are within the Project limits. The County will confer with the State as to the handling, disposal, and any other issues related to contaminated materials found on State Right-of-Way or import of materials onto State Right-of-Way. 220 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -5- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal C. Environmental Consultant. The County will provide for an Environmental Consultant to be on site to observe and document the excavation, handling and disposal of contaminated soils that have been identified within the Project limits. If the contractor encounters contaminated materials in areas not previously identified and upon notification by the County to the State, the County hired Environmental Consultant will be provided to collect and analyze soil and/or groundwater samples to determine contaminant levels, work with the landfill for disposal of the soil waste, and provide oversight of any soil and groundwater handling and disposal. The County will not allow the contractor to excavate any contaminated soil unless the Environmental Consultant is present. 3.8. Completion of Construction. The County will cause the contract construction to be started and completed according to the time schedule in the construction contract special provisions. The completion date for the contract construction may be extended, by an exchange of letters between the appropriate County official and the State District Engineer's authorized representative, for unavoidable delays encountered in the performance of the contract construction. 3.9. Plan Changes. The State will not participate in the cost of any contract construction that is in addition to the State participation construction covered under this Agreement unless the following conditions have been met: A. The necessary State funds have been encumbered. B. All changes in the Project Plans and all addenda, change orders, supplemental agreements, and work orders entered into by the County and its contractor for State participation construction are approved in writing by the State District Engineer's authorized representative. 3.10. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. The County will comply and cause its contractor to comply with all Federal, State, and Local laws, and all applicable ordinances and regulations. With respect only to that portion of work performed on the State's Trunk Highway Right-of-Way, the County will not require the contractor to follow local ordinances or to obtain local permits. 4. Right-of-Way; Easements; Permits 4.1. The County will obtain all rights-of-way, easements, construction permits, and any other permits and sanctions that may be required in connection with the local and trunk highway portions of the contract construction. Before payment by the State, the County will furnish the State with certified copies of the documents for rights-of-way and easements, construction permits, and other permits and sanctions required for State participation construction covered under this Agreement. 4.2. The County will convey to the State by quit claim deed, all newly acquired rights needed for the continuing operation and maintenance of the Trunk Highway, if any, upon completion of the Project, at no cost or expense to the State. 4.3. The County will comply with Minnesota Statutes § 216D.04, subdivision 1(a), for identification, notification, design meetings, and depiction of utilities affected by the contract construction. 4.4. Victoria and Chanhassen will each submit to the State's Utility Engineer an original permit application for all utilities owned by the them to be constructed upon and within the Trunk Highway Right-of-Way. Applications for permits will be made on State form "Application for Utility Permit on Trunk Highway Right-of-Way" (Form 2525). 4.5. Victoria and Chanhassen will each submit to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency the plans and specifications for the construction or reconstruction of their respective sanitary sewer facilities to be performed under the construction contract and obtain, under Minnesota Statutes § 115.07 or Minnesota Rules 7001.1030, subpart 2C, either a permit or written waiver from that agency for that construction or reconstruction. Victoria and Chanhassen are advised that under Minnesota Rules 7001.1040, a written 221 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -6- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal application for the permit or waiver must be submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency at least 180 days before the planned date of the sanitary sewer facility construction or reconstruction. 5. Maintenance by the County Upon completion of the Project, the County will provide the following without cost or expense to the State: 5.1. DRAINAGE PROVISIONS ARE IN PROCESS. 5.2. Shared Use Path. The County will provide routine and minor maintenance of the shared use path on State Right-of-Way as shown in Exhibit E. Routine and minor maintenance may include, but are not limited to, snow and ice control/removal, sweeping and debris removal, patching, crack repair, replacement of failing section(s) of pavement, vegetation control, signing, pavement markings, and any other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the shared use path in a safe, usable, and aesthetically acceptable condition as determined by the State's District Maintenance Engineer and all applicable laws including, but not limited to, the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). If the County fails to perform its maintenance services under this Agreement in compliance with applicable laws, the State will provide the County with a notice of non-compliance. Within three business days of sending the notice of non-compliance, the State's District Maintenance Engineer and the County's Engineer will meet to discuss the County 's performance of maintenance and decide upon next steps to remedy any non-compliant performance. If the parties cannot agree upon a remedy, the State may perform such obligation and the County will reimburse the State for the cost thereof, plus 10 percent of such cost for overhead and supervision within 30 days of receipt of the State's invoice. The State and the County agree that full pavement replacement is outside of routine and minor maintenance, and the State and the County will share in the cost of pavement replacement according to the State's Cost Participation and Maintenance Responsibilities with Local Units of Government Manual, as amended or revised. A. Right-of-Way Access. The State authorizes the County to enter upon State Right-of-Way to perform the maintenance activities described in this Article 5. The County must notify and coordinate with the State’s District Maintenance Engineer prior to accessing State Right-of-Way. While the County is occupying the State's Right-of-Way, they must comply with the approved traffic control plan and with the applicable provisions of the Work Zone Field Handbook (http://www.dot.state.mn.us/trafficeng/workzone/index.html). All County personnel occupying the State's Right-of-Way must be provided with required reflective clothing and hats. B. Environmental. The County shall not dispose of any materials regulated by any governmental or regulatory agency onto the ground, or into any body of water, or into any container on the State's Right-of-Way. In the event of spillage of regulated materials, the County shall immediately notify the State’s Authorized Representative in writing and shall provide for cleanup of the spilled material and any materials contaminated by the spillage in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, at the sole expense of the County. 5.3. Additional Drainage. No party to this Agreement will drain any additional drainage volume into the storm sewer facilities constructed under the construction contract that was not included in the drainage for which the storm sewer facilities were designed, without first obtaining written permission to do so from the other party. 6. Maintenance by Victoria Upon completion of the Project, Victoria will provide the following without cost or expense to the State: 6.1. Roundabout on TH 5 at Commercial Avenue A. Roundabout Approaches. Maintenance of Commercial Avenue approaches up to the curb line of the outer circle of the TH 5 roundabout. Maintenance includes, but is not limited to, snow, ice and debris 222 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -7- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal removal, resurfacing, seal coating, and any other maintenance activities according to accepted City maintenance practices. B. Roundabout Circle. Maintenance of the roundabout circle at TH 5 and Commercial Avenue. The State and City will provide for snow, ice and debris removal of the roadway portion of the roundabout circle in conjunction with ongoing maintenance activities of their respective roadway approaches to the roundabout circle. The State will provide for resurfacing, seal coating, and any other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the roadway portion of the roundabout circle in a safe and usable condition. C. Roundabout Lighting. Maintenance of lighting on Feed Point 10H1 (Light System A) at and approaching the TH 5 and Commercial Avenue roundabout, including all legs and within the roundabout, will be shared between the State and Victoria. Victoria will be responsible for the hook up cost and application to secure an adequate power supply to the service pad or pole and will pay all monthly electrical service expenses necessary to operate the lighting facility. Victoria will be responsible for minor maintenance, including but not limited to re-lamping or LED luminaire replacement, repair or replacement of all damaged luminaire glassware, luminaires when damaged or when ballasts fail, photoelectric control on luminaires, and painting of poles and other equipment, if applicable, for the entire system. The State will be responsible for major maintenance, including but not limited to Gopher State One Call (GSOC) locates, knocked down poles including wiring within the poles, damaged poles, pull boxes, underground wire, loose connections, damaged foundations, defective starter boards or drivers, damaged fuse holders, and blown fuses for the entire system. 6.2. Landscaping. Maintenance of trees, shrubs and other plantings in the Trunk Highway Right-of-Way as shown on Exhibit D. Maintenance includes, but is not limited to, maintaining all landscape features (grass, flowers, shrubs, trees, etc.), mowing, watering, weeding, fertilizing, trimming/pruning to ensure the health of the vegetation and that appropriate clear zones and sight lines are maintained, removal of diseased plants/trees, full replacement and/or removal, and any other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the landscaping in a safe, usable, and aesthetically pleasing condition. 6.3. Irrigation System. Maintenance of landscaping and the irrigation system in the TH 5 and Commercial Avenue roundabout, as shown on Exhibit D. Maintenance includes but is not limited to, maintenance, repair and replacement of all irrigation components (point of connection, piping system, electrical system and sprinkler heads (if any)); detection, repair and replacement of broken components; investigation of dry spots, leaving valves, stuck valves and broken risers; completing an annual inspection by a certified professional; full replacement and/or removal and any other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the irrigation system in a usable and aesthetically pleasing condition. The City will be responsible for any and all damages to State property caused by the irrigation system. The City will be responsible for keeping accurate records on the irrigation system and providing locating services within 48-hours notification. The City will be responsible for any damages that result from any errors associated with the locates. The City will be responsible for correcting any damages to the irrigation system, regardless of who caused the damage. Any changes/updates to the irrigation system must be approved by the State. The State must have access to all master shut off valves at all times. The State reserves the right to turn off the water supply at any time and for any reason. 6.4. DRAINAGE PROVISIONS ARE IN PROCESS. 6.5. Municipal Utilities. Maintenance of any municipal-owned utilities construction within the Victoria city limits, without cost or expense to the State. 6.6. Sidewalks. Maintenance of any sidewalk construction, including stamped and colored concrete sidewalk (if any) and pedestrian ramps with the Victoria city limits. Maintenance includes, but is not limited to, snow, ice and debris removal, patching, crack repair, panel replacement, cross-street pedestrian crosswalk 223 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -8- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal markings, vegetation control of boulevards (if any), and any other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the sidewalks in a safe, useable, and aesthetically acceptable condition. 6.7. Shared Use Path. Victoria will provide routine and minor maintenance of the shared use path on State Right-of-Way as shown in Exhibit E. Routine and minor maintenance may include, but are not limited to, snow and ice control/removal, sweeping and debris removal, patching, crack repair, replacement of failing section(s) of pavement, vegetation control, signing, pavement markings, and any other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the shared use path in a safe, usable, and aesthetically acceptable condition as determined by the State's District Maintenance Engineer and all applicable laws including, but not limited to, the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). If Victoria fails to perform its maintenance services under this Agreement in compliance with applicable laws, the State will provide Victoria with a notice of non-compliance. Within three business days of sending the notice of non-compliance, the State's District Maintenance Engineer and Victoria's Engineer will meet to discuss Victoria's performance of maintenance and decide upon next steps to remedy any non-compliant performance. If the parties cannot agree upon a remedy, the State may perform such obligation and Victoria will reimburse the State for the cost thereof, plus 10 percent of such cost for overhead and supervision within 30 days of receipt of the State's invoice. The State and Victoria agree that full pavement replacement is outside of routine and minor maintenance, and the State and Victoria will share in the cost of pavement replacement according to the State's Cost Participation and Maintenance Responsibilities with Local Units of Government Manual, as amended or revised. A. Right-of-Way Access. The State authorizes Victoria to enter upon State Right-of-Way to perform the maintenance activities described in this Article 6. Victoria must notify and coordinate with the State’s District Maintenance Engineer prior to accessing State Right-of-Way. While Victoria is occupying the State's Right-of-Way, they must comply with the approved traffic control plan and with the applicable provisions of the Work Zone Field Handbook (http://www.dot.state.mn.us/trafficeng/workzone/index.html). All Victoria personnel occupying the State's Right-of-Way must be provided with required reflective clothing and hats. B. Environmental. Victoria shall not dispose of any materials regulated by any governmental or regulatory agency onto the ground, or into any body of water, or into any container on the State's Right-of-Way. In the event of spillage of regulated materials, Victoria shall immediately notify the State’s Authorized Representative in writing and shall provide for cleanup of the spilled material and any materials contaminated by the spillage in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, at the sole expense of Victoria. 6.8. Retaining Walls. Maintenance of the following retaining wall construction and associated fencing. Routine maintenance includes graffiti removal and any other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the walls in a safe, usable, and aesthetically acceptable condition. Nonroutine maintenance includes repairs, replacement, and paining necessary for the lifelong integrity of the wall. A. Prefabricated Modular Block (PMB) Retaining Wall A: Victoria will own and provide routine and nonroutine maintenance for PMB Wall A. Victoria will also own and maintain the vinyl coated wire fence on top of the wall. B. Cast in Place (CIP) Retaining Walls C and D: Victoria will own and provide routine and nonroutine maintenance for CIP Walls C and D. Victoria will also own and maintain the vinyl coated wire fence on top of the walls. C. CIP Retaining Walls E and F: Victoria will own and provide routine and nonroutine maintenance for CIP Walls E and F. 224 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -9- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal 6.9. Noise Wall. Maintenance of the non-highway side of Noise Wall A on TH 5 west of Kochia Lane. Maintenance includes vegetation control, graffiti removal on the non-highway side, and any other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the walls in a safe, usable, and aesthetically acceptable condition. 6.10. Pedestrian Trail Bridge 10X27 Under TH 5. Ownership, maintenance, repair, and reconstruction of pedestrian trail Bridge 10X27 (Madelyn underpass) under TH 5. Victoria will perform all maintenance including, but not limited to, snow and ice control/removal, sweeping and debris removal, patching, crack repair, pavement replacement, graffiti removal, signing, pavement markings, wing wall repair and/or replacement, anchor and panel repair, painting, repair or replacement of damaged aesthetic finishes, and any other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the pedestrian trail bridge in a safe, usable, and aesthetically acceptable condition. Victoria will perform required bridge safety inspections of the pedestrian trail bridge and share inspection reports with the State. Victoria will be responsible for inspection, minor and major maintenance, replacement, and any other costs. If the State deems Victoria’s maintenance practices unacceptable, the State shall complete the necessary maintenance and invoice Victoria. Victoria may remove the pedestrian trail bridge in the future provided that the State’s right-of- way is restored to the State’s standards and subject to any Federal Aid reimbursement, all at Victoria's expense. 6.11. Pedestrian Trail Bridge 10065 Over TH 5. The State will share ownership responsibilities for pedestrian trail Bridge 10065 (78th Street overpass) with Victoria. A. Victoria's Responsibilities. Victoria will be listed as the owner of the bridge in the National Bridge Inspection Standards database. Victoria will be responsible for major and minor maintenance for the bridge. Major maintenance includes all structural related maintenance, including expansion joint flushing, deck crack sealing, painting, overlays, redecking and rehabilitation of the bridge, concrete bridge approach panels, and structurally-supported signing on the bridge. Minor maintenance includes all nonstructural maintenance activities on the bridge. Victoria will keep the trail and bridge reasonably clear from ice, snow, litter, and debris and undertake proper and timely cleaning and ice and snow control measures when necessary; and keep the trail free and clear from ice, snow, litter and debris in accordance with ADA standards. Ice, snow, litter, and debris removal will cover the entire bridge width without pushing ice or snow onto any roadway, railroad, multi-use trail or walkway below the bridge. Victoria will be responsible for pavement markings, guardrail on the local trail, graffiti removal that is visible from the local trail, and non-structurally supported signing. Victoria will be responsible for oversize, overweight and special use permits. Future replacement of the bridge will be in accordance with the State's Cost Participation and Maintenance Responsibilities with Local Units of Government Manual, as amended or revised. B. State Responsibilities. The State will perform or contract structural inspections of the bridge and invoice Victoria for the cost of those activities. The State is responsible for the following: Maintenance of all guardrails on TH 5 below the bridge. Maintenance of any roadway signing that is attached to the bridge for the purpose of the roadway traffic on TH 5. Maintenance of all nonornamental fencing on the Trunk Highway Right-of-Way. Maintenance of graffiti removal within the control of access below the bridge. The State will provide emergency response for traffic hits and restitution from insurance companies or private parties who have damaged the bridge. If the costs for repairs cannot be recovered through the restitution process, the State will invoice Victoria for the full cost of the repairs, including costs related to response, engineering, and traffic control related to the damage. The State retains its authority to administer, issue, and regulate access permits, sign advertising permits, drainage permits, flag installation, and permits to install utilities on Trunk Highway Right-of-Way. 6.12. Lighting. Maintenance and ownership of the lighting facilities construction on Feed Points B (Light System B) and H (Light System H), as shown on Exhibit C. Maintenance of electrical lighting systems 225 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -10- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal includes everything within the system, from the point of attachment to the power source or utility, to the last light on the feed point, including but not limited to re-lamping of lighting units or replacing of LED luminaires, repair or replacement of all damaged luminaire glassware, loose connections, luminaires when damaged or when ballasts fail, photoelectric control on luminaires, defective starter boards or drivers, damaged fuse holders, blown fuses, knocked down poles including wiring within the poles, damaged poles, pull boxes, underground wire, damaged foundations, equipment pad, installation of approved splices or replacement of wires, repair or extending of conduit, lighting cabinet maintenance including photoelectric cell, electrical distribution system, Gopher State One Call (GSOC) locates, and painting of poles and other equipment. Victoria will be responsible for the hook up cost and application to secure an adequate power supply to the service pads or poles and will pay all monthly electrical service expenses necessary to operate the lighting facilities. 6.13. Additional Drainage. No party to this Agreement will drain any additional drainage volume into the storm sewer facilities constructed under the construction contract that was not included in the drainage for which the storm sewer facilities were designed, without first obtaining written permission to do so from the other party. 7. Maintenance by Chanhassen Upon completion of the Project, Chanhassen will provide the following without cost or expense to the State: 7.1. DRAINAGE PROVISIONS ARE IN PROCESS. 7.2. Municipal Utilities. Maintenance of any municipal-owned utilities construction within the Chanhassen city limits, without cost or expense to the State. 7.3. Shared Use Path. Chanhassen will provide routine and minor maintenance of the shared use path on State Right-of-Way as shown in Exhibit E. Routine and minor maintenance may include, but are not limited to, snow and ice control/removal, sweeping and debris removal, patching, crack repair, replacement of failing section(s) of pavement, vegetation control, signing, pavement markings, and any other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the shared use path in a safe, usable, and aesthetically acceptable condition as determined by the State's District Maintenance Engineer and all applicable laws including, but not limited to, the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). If Chanhassen fails to perform its maintenance services under this Agreement in compliance with applicable laws, the State will provide Chanhassen with a notice of non-compliance. Within three business days of sending the notice of non-compliance, the State's District Maintenance Engineer and Chanhassen's Engineer will meet to discuss Chanhassen's performance of maintenance and decide upon next steps to remedy any non-compliant performance. If the parties cannot agree upon a remedy, the State may perform such obligation and Chanhassen will reimburse the State for the cost thereof, plus 10 percent of such cost for overhead and supervision within 30 days of receipt of the State's invoice. The State and Chanhassen agree that full pavement replacement is outside of routine and minor maintenance, and the State and Chanhassen will share in the cost of pavement replacement according to the State's Cost Participation and Maintenance Responsibilities with Local Units of Government Manual, as amended or revised. A. Right-of-Way Access. The State authorizes Chanhassen to enter upon State Right-of-Way to perform the maintenance activities described in this Article 7. Chanhassen must notify and coordinate with the State’s District Maintenance Engineer prior to accessing State Right-of-Way. While Chanhassen is occupying the State's Right-of-Way, they must comply with the approved traffic control plan and with the applicable provisions of the Work Zone Field Handbook (http://www.dot.state.mn.us/trafficeng/workzone/index.html). All Chanhassen personnel occupying the State's Right-of-Way must be provided with required reflective clothing and hats. 226 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -11- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal B. Environmental. Chanhassen shall not dispose of any materials regulated by any governmental or regulatory agency onto the ground, or into any body of water, or into any container on the State's Right-of-Way. In the event of spillage of regulated materials, Chanhassen shall immediately notify the State’s Authorized Representative in writing and shall provide for cleanup of the spilled material and any materials contaminated by the spillage in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, at the sole expense of Chanhassen. 7.4. Retaining Walls. Maintenance of the following retaining wall construction and associated fencing. Routine maintenance includes graffiti removal and any other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the walls in a safe, usable, and aesthetically acceptable condition. Nonroutine maintenance includes repairs, replacement, and paining necessary for the lifelong integrity of the wall. A. PMB Retaining Wall C: Chanhassen will provide routine maintenance for PMB Wall C. The State will own the wall and provide nonroutine maintenance for the wall. The State will also own and maintain the vinyl coated wire fence on top of the wall. 7.5. Pedestrian Trail Bridge 10X26 Under TH 5. Ownership, maintenance, repair, and reconstruction of pedestrian trail Bridge 10X26 (TH 5-TH 41 underpass) under TH 5. Chanhassen will perform all maintenance including, but not limited to, snow and ice control/removal, sweeping and debris removal, patching, crack repair, pavement replacement, graffiti removal, signing, pavement markings, wing wall repair and/or replacement, anchor and panel repair, painting, repair or replacement of damaged aesthetic finishes, and any other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the pedestrian trail bridge in a safe, usable, and aesthetically acceptable condition. Chanhassen will perform required bridge safety inspections of the pedestrian trail bridge and share inspection reports with the State. Chanhassen will be responsible for inspection, minor and major maintenance, replacement, and any other costs. If the State deems Chanhassen’s maintenance practices unacceptable, the State shall complete the necessary maintenance and invoice Chanhassen. Chanhassen may remove the pedestrian trail bridge in the future provided that the State’s right-of-way is restored to the State’s standards and subject to any Federal Aid reimbursement, all at Chanhassen's expense. 7.6. Lighting. Maintenance and ownership of the lighting facilities construction on Feed Point F (Light System F), as shown on Exhibit C. Maintenance of electrical lighting systems includes everything within the system, from the point of attachment to the power source or utility, to the last light on the feed point, including but not limited to re-lamping of lighting units or replacing of LED luminaires, repair or replacement of all damaged luminaire glassware, loose connections, luminaires when damaged or when ballasts fail, photoelectric control on luminaires, defective starter boards or drivers, damaged fuse holders, blown fuses, knocked down poles including wiring within the poles, damaged poles, pull boxes, underground wire, damaged foundations, equipment pad, installation of approved splices or replacement of wires, repair or extending of conduit, lighting cabinet maintenance including photoelectric cell, electrical distribution system, Gopher State One Call (GSOC) locates, and painting of poles and other equipment. Chanhassen will be responsible for the hook up cost and application to secure an adequate power supply to the service pad or pole and will pay all monthly electrical service expenses necessary to operate the lighting facility. 7.7. Additional Drainage. No party to this Agreement will drain any additional drainage volume into the storm sewer facilities constructed under the construction contract that was not included in the drainage for which the storm sewer facilities were designed, without first obtaining written permission to do so from the other party. 227 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -12- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal 8. Signal Systems and EVP Systems Operation and Maintenance 8.1. TH 5 and Century Boulevard All operation and maintenance terms, including timing and power provisions, in Traffic Control Signal Agreement No. 80337R, dated August 10, 2000, for the existing traffic control signal on TH 5 at Century Boulevard in Chanhassen (Signal System ID 1736241) will remain in full force and effect. 8.2. TH 5 and CSAH 13 Operation and maintenance responsibilities will be as follows for the Traffic Control Signal System at the intersection of TH 5 and CSAH 13, Signal System ID 22474822 (Signal System B and EVP System B). This Agreement will supersede and terminate the operation and maintenance terms of any previous agreements between the parties for the signal system. A. County Responsibilities i. Power. The County will be responsible for the hook-up cost and application to secure an adequate power supply to the service pad(s) or pole(s) and will pay all monthly electrical service expenses necessary to operate the Signal System and EVP System. ii. Minor Signal System Maintenance. The County will provide for the following, without cost to the State. (a) Maintain the signal pole mounted LED luminaires, including replacing the luminaires when necessary. The LED luminaire must be replaced when it fails or when light levels drop below recommended AASHTO levels for the installation. (b) Replace the Signal System LED indications. Replacing LED indications consists of replacing each LED indication when it reaches end of life per the MnDOT Traffic Engineering Manual or fails or no longer meets Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) standards for light output. (c) Clean the Signal System controller cabinet and service cabinet exteriors. (d) Clean the Signal System and luminaire mast arm extensions. (e) Paint and maintain the cross-street pedestrian crosswalk markings. B. State Responsibilities i. Interconnect; Timing; Other Maintenance. The State will maintain the Interconnect and signing and perform all other Signal System, APS, and signal pole luminaire circuit maintenance without cost to the County. All Signal System timing will be determined by the State, and no changes will be made without the State's approval. ii. EVP System Operation. The EVP System will be installed, operated, maintained, and removed according to the following conditions and requirements: (a) All maintenance of the EVP System must be done by State forces. (b) Emitter units may be installed only on authorized emergency vehicles, as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 169.011, Subdivision 3. Authorized emergency vehicles may use emitter units only when responding to an emergency. The County will provide the State's District Engineer or their designated representative a list of all vehicles with emitter units, if requested by the State. (c) Malfunction of the EVP System must be reported to the State immediately. (d) In the event the EVP System or its components are, in the opinion of the State, being misused or the conditions set forth in Paragraph (b). above are violated, and such misuse or violation continues after the County receives written notice from the State, the State may remove the 228 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -13- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal EVP System. Upon removal of the EVP System pursuant to this Paragraph, all of its parts and components become the property of the State. (e) All timing of the EVP System will be determined by the State. 8.3. TH 5 and Park Drive/Kochia Lane Operation and maintenance responsibilities will be as follows for the Traffic Control Signal System at the intersection of TH 5 and Park Drive/Kochia Lane, Signal System ID 22474821 (Signal System A and EVP System A). A. Victoria Responsibilities i. Power. Victoria will be responsible for the hook-up cost and application to secure an adequate power supply to the service pad(s) or pole(s) and will pay all monthly electrical service expenses necessary to operate the Signal System and EVP System. ii. Minor Signal System Maintenance. Victoria will provide for the following, without cost to the State. (a) Maintain the signal pole mounted LED luminaires, including replacing the luminaires when necessary. The LED luminaire must be replaced when it fails or when light levels drop below recommended AASHTO levels for the installation. (b) Replace the Signal System LED indications. Replacing LED indications consists of replacing each LED indication when it reaches end of life per the MnDOT Traffic Engineering Manual or fails or no longer meets Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) standards for light output. (c) Clean the Signal System controller cabinet and service cabinet exteriors. (d) Clean the Signal System and luminaire mast arm extensions. (e) Paint and maintain the cross-street pedestrian crosswalk markings. B. State Responsibilities i. Interconnect; Timing; Other Maintenance. The State will maintain the Interconnect and signing and perform all other Signal System, APS, and signal pole luminaire circuit maintenance without cost to Victoria. All Signal System timing will be determined by the State, and no changes will be made without the State's approval. ii. EVP System Operation. The EVP System will be installed, operated, maintained, and removed according to the following conditions and requirements: (a) All maintenance of the EVP System must be done by State forces. (b) Emitter units may be installed only on authorized emergency vehicles, as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 169.011, Subdivision 3. Authorized emergency vehicles may use emitter units only when responding to an emergency. Victoria will provide the State's District Engineer or their designated representative a list of all vehicles with emitter units, if requested by the State. (c) Malfunction of the EVP System must be reported to the State immediately. (d) In the event the EVP System or its components are, in the opinion of the State, being misused or the conditions set forth in Paragraph (b). above are violated, and such misuse or violation continues after Victoria receives written notice from the State, the State may remove the EVP System. Upon removal of the EVP System pursuant to this Paragraph, all of its parts and components become the property of the State. (e) All timing of the EVP System will be determined by the State. 229 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -14- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal 8.4. TH 5 and Minnewashta Parkway Operation and maintenance responsibilities will be as follows for the Traffic Control Signal System at the intersection of TH 5 and Minnewashta Parkway, Signal System ID 22474823 (Signal System C and EVP System C). This Agreement will supersede and terminate the operation and maintenance terms of any previous agreements between the parties for the signal system. A. Chanhassen Responsibilities i. Power. Chanhassen will be responsible for the hook-up cost and application to secure an adequate power supply to the service pad(s) or pole(s) and will pay all monthly electrical service expenses necessary to operate the Signal System and EVP System. ii. Minor Signal System Maintenance. Chanhassen will provide for the following, without cost to the State. (a) Maintain the signal pole mounted LED luminaires, including replacing the luminaires when necessary. The LED luminaire must be replaced when it fails or when light levels drop below recommended AASHTO levels for the installation. (b) Replace the Signal System LED indications. Replacing LED indications consists of replacing each LED indication when it reaches end of life per the MnDOT Traffic Engineering Manual or fails or no longer meets Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) standards for light output. (c) Clean the Signal System controller cabinet and service cabinet exteriors. (d) Clean the Signal System and luminaire mast arm extensions. (e) Paint and maintain the cross-street pedestrian crosswalk markings. B. State Responsibilities i. Interconnect; Timing; Other Maintenance. The State will maintain the Interconnect and signing and perform all other Signal System, APS, and signal pole luminaire circuit maintenance without cost to Chanhassen. All Signal System timing will be determined by the State, and no changes will be made without the State's approval. ii. EVP System Operation. The EVP System will be installed, operated, maintained, and removed according to the following conditions and requirements: (a) All maintenance of the EVP System must be done by State forces. (b) Emitter units may be installed only on authorized emergency vehicles, as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 169.011, Subdivision 3. Authorized emergency vehicles may use emitter units only when responding to an emergency. Chanhassen will provide the State's District Engineer or their designated representative a list of all vehicles with emitter units, if requested by the State. (c) Malfunction of the EVP System must be reported to the State immediately. (d) In the event the EVP System or its components are, in the opinion of the State, being misused or the conditions set forth in Paragraph (b). above are violated, and such misuse or violation continues after Chanhassen receives written notice from the State, the State may remove the EVP System. Upon removal of the EVP System pursuant to this Paragraph, all of its parts and components become the property of the State. (e) All timing of the EVP System will be determined by the State. 8.5. Right-of-Way Access. Each party authorizes the other parties to enter upon their respective public right-of-way to perform the maintenance activities described in this Agreement. 230 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -15- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal 9. Basis of State Cost 9.1. Schedule "I". The Preliminary Schedule "I" includes anticipated State participation construction items covered under this Agreement. 9.2. State Participation Construction. The State will participate in the following at the percentages indicated. The construction includes the State's proportionate share of item costs for mobilization, field office, field laboratory, and traffic control. The construction includes, but is not limited to, those construction items tabulated on Sheets 2 through 12 of the Preliminary Schedule “I” and is reflective of the Participation Distribution prepared by the Office of State Aid for Local Transportation. A. 20 Percent will be the State's LPP match to the County Federal Aid STP funds for all of the grading, bituminous surfacing, roundabout, ADA improvements, retaining and noise walls, signals, TMS, and lighting construction up to the capped amount of State LPP funds as described in Article 9.3. B. Once the cap for the State LPP funds has been exceeded, additional County Federal Aid STP funds and their match and County Federal Aid NHPP funds and their match will be applied up to their capped amounts. C. Once those caps have been exceeded, 80 percent will be the State's Federal STP and State match rate of cost participation in said construction up to the capped amount described in Article 9.3. D. Once the available State Federal STP and State match funds have been expended, the County will be 100 percent responsible for the remainder of said construction. 9.3. Capped Funding. The State LPP funds available for this project are capped at $1,000,000.00. The State Federal STP funds available for this project are capped at $4,640,000.00. The State match funds available for this project are capped at $1,160,000.00. 9.4. Addenda, Change Orders, Supplemental Agreements, and Work Orders. The State will share in the costs of construction contract addenda, change orders, supplemental agreements, and work orders that are necessary to complete the State participation construction covered under this Agreement and are approved in writing by the State District Engineer's authorized representative up to the capped amount of available State funds as described in Article 9.3. 9.5. Liquidated Damages. All liquidated damages assessed the County's contractor in connection with the construction contract will result in a credit shared by each party in the same proportion as their total construction cost share covered under this Agreement is to the total contract construction cost before any deduction for liquidated damages. 10. State Cost and Payment by the State 10.1. State Cost. $6,512,172.68 is the State's estimated share of the costs of the contract construction (less State Furnished Materials cost), as shown in the Preliminary Schedule "I." The Preliminary Schedule "I" was prepared using anticipated construction items and estimated quantities and unit prices and may include any credits or lump sum costs. Upon review of the construction contract bid documents described in Article 3.2, the State will decide whether to concur in the County's award of the construction contract and, if so, prepare a Revised Schedule "I" based on construction contract construction items, quantities, and unit prices, which will replace and supersede the Preliminary Schedule "I" as part of this Agreement. 10.2. Conditions of Payment. The State will pay the County the State's total estimated construction cost share as shown in the Revised Schedule "I," after the following conditions have been met: A. Encumbrance by the State of the State's total estimated construction cost share, the construction engineering cost share, and the contingency amount, as shown in the Revised Schedule "I." 231 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -16- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal B. Approval by the State's Land Management Director at Saint Paul of certified documentation, submitted by the County, for all right-of-way and easement acquisitions required for the contract construction. C. Execution of this Agreement and transmittal to the County, including a letter advising of the State's concurrence in the award of the construction contract. D. The State's receipt of a written request from the County for the advancement of funds. The request will include certification by the County that all necessary parties have executed the construction contract. 10.3. Limitations of State Payment; No State Payment to Contractor. The State's participation in the contract construction is limited to the State participation construction shown in Article 9, and the State's participation will not change except by a mutually agreed written amendment to this Agreement. The State's payment obligation extends only to the County. The County's contractor is not intended to be and will not be deemed to be a third party beneficiary of this Agreement. The County's contractor will have no right to receive payment from the State. The State will have no responsibility for claims asserted against the County by the County's contractor. 10.4. Construction Costs Exceeding Encumbered Amount. Whenever it appears the cost of the State participation construction covered under this Agreement is about to exceed the current amount of encumbered State funds, the County will notify the State District Engineer's authorized representative in writing prior to performance of the additional State participation construction. Notification will include an estimate in the amount of additional funds necessary to complete the State participation construction including construction engineering costs and the reason(s) why the current amount encumbered will be exceeded. The State will, upon its approval of the additional State participation construction, encumber the necessary additional funds. That action will have the effect of amending this Agreement so as to include the State's share of the costs of the additional construction. Should the County cause the performance of additional contract construction which would otherwise qualify for State participation construction covered under this Agreement, but for which the State has not previously encumbered funds, that additional contract construction is done at the County's own risk. The County will notify the State District Engineer's authorized representative in writing of the additional State participation construction. Notification will include an estimate in the amount of additional funds necessary to cover the additional State participation construction including construction engineering costs and the reason(s) why the current amount encumbered was exceeded. If the State District Engineer's authorized representative approves the additional State participation construction, the County's claim for compensation along with a request for encumbrance of the necessary additional funds will be submitted to the State's Budget Section for review of compliance with Minnesota Statutes § 16A.15, subdivision 3, but no guarantee is made that the claim will be approved by the State's Budget Section. If the claim for compensation and the request for encumbrance of the necessary additional funds are approved by the State's Budget Section, that action will have the effect of amending this Agreement so as to include the State's share of the costs of the additional construction. 10.5. Records Keeping and Invoicing by the County. The State will provide the County with a Payment Processing Package containing a Modified Schedule "I" form, instructions, and samples of documents for processing final payment of the State participation construction covered under this Agreement. The County will keep records and accounts that enable it to provide the State with the following prior to final payment: A. A copy of the Modified Schedule "I" which includes final quantities of State participation construction. B. Copies of the County contractor's invoice(s) covering all contract construction. 232 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -17- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal C. Copies of the endorsed and canceled County warrant(s) or check(s) paying for final contract construction, or computer documentation of the warrant(s) issued, certified by an appropriate County official that final construction contract payment has been made. D. Copies of all construction contract change orders, supplemental agreements, and work orders. E. A certification form, attached to a copy of the Final Schedule "I," both provided by the State. The certification form will be signed by the County's Engineer in charge of the contract construction attesting to the following: i. Satisfactory performance and completion of all contract construction according to the Project Plans. ii. Acceptance and approval of all materials furnished for the contract construction relative to compliance of those materials to the State's current Standard Specifications for Construction. iii. Full payment by the County to its contractor for all contract construction. F. When requested, copies certified by the County's Engineer, of material sampling reports and material testing results for the materials furnished for the contract construction. G. A copy of the "as built" plan sent to the State Aid Agreements Engineer. H. A formal invoice (original and signed) in the amount due the County as shown in the Final Schedule "I." 10.6. Final Payment by the State. Upon completion of all contract construction, the State will prepare a Final Schedule "I" according to the procedures detailed in the Payment Processing Package and submit a copy to the County. The Final Schedule "I" will be based on final quantities, and include all State participation construction items cost share covered under this Agreement. If the final cost of the State participation construction exceeds the amount of funds advanced by the State, the State will pay the difference to the County without interest up to the capped amount of available State funds. If the final cost of the State participation construction is less than the amount of funds advanced by the State, the County will refund the difference to the State without interest. The State and the County waive claims for any payments or refunds less than $5.00 according to Minnesota Statutes § 15.415. 10.7. State Furnished Materials. The State will furnish the items listed on page 23 of the Preliminary Schedule "I" (State Furnished Materials), according to the Project Plans, to operate the traffic control Signal Systems covered under this Agreement. The County's lump sum share for State Furnished Materials is $143,913.66. The State's lump sum share for State Furnished Materials is $143,913.66. The County's and the State's cost shares for State Furnished Materials will be deducted from the State's total construction cost share as shown in the Schedule "I." 11. Authorized Representatives Each party's Authorized Representative is responsible for administering this Agreement and is authorized to give and receive any notice or demand required or permitted by this Agreement. 11.1. The State's Authorized Representative will be: Name, Title: Malaki Ruranika, Cooperative Agreements Engineer (or successor) Address: 395 John Ireland Boulevard, Mailstop 682, Saint Paul, MN 55155 Telephone: (651) 366-4634 Email: malaki.ruranika@state.mn.us 233 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -18- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal 11.2. The County's Authorized Representative will be: Name, Title: Lyndon Robjent, County Engineer (or successor) Address: 11360 Highway 12 W., Suite 1, Cologne, MN 55322 Telephone: (952) 466-5200 Email: lrobjent@co.carver.mn.us 11.3. Victoria's Authorized Representative will be: Name, Title: Cara Geheren, City Engineer (or successor) Address: 1670 Stieger Lake Lane, MN 55386 Telephone: (651) 316-0942 Email: cara.geheren@bolton-menk.com 11.4. Chanhassen's Authorized Representative will be: Name, Title: Charles Howley, City Engineer (or successor) Address: 7700 Market Boulevard, PO Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone: (952) 227-1169 Email: chowley@chanhassenmn.gov 12. Assignment; Amendments; Waiver; Contract Complete 12.1. Assignment. No party may assign or transfer any rights or obligations under this Agreement without the prior consent of the other parties and a written assignment agreement, executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this Agreement, or their successors in office. The foregoing does not prohibit the County, Victoria, or Chanhassen from contracting with a third-party to perform their respective maintenance responsibilities covered under this Agreement. 12.2. Amendments. Any amendment to this Agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original Agreement, or their successors in office. 12.3. Waiver. If a party fails to enforce any provision of this Agreement, that failure does not waive the provision or the party's right to subsequently enforce it. 12.4. Contract Complete. This Agreement contains all prior negotiations and agreements between the State, the County, Victoria, and Chanhassen. No other understanding regarding this Agreement, whether written or oral, may be used to bind any party. 13. Liability; Worker Compensation Claims; Insurance 13.1. Each party is responsible for its own acts, omissions and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law and will not be responsible for the acts and omissions of others and the results thereof. Minnesota Statutes § 3.736 and other applicable law govern liability of the State. Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 and other applicable law govern liability of the County, Victoria, and Chanhassen. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the County, Victoria, and Chanhassen will indemnify, hold harmless, and defend (to the extent permitted by the Minnesota Attorney General) the State against any claims, causes of actions, damages, costs (including reasonable attorney's fees), and expenses arising in connection with the Project covered by this Agreement, regardless of whether such claims are asserted by the County's, Victoria's, or Chanhassen's contractor(s) or consultant(s) or by a third party because of an act or omission by the County, Victoria, or Chanhassen or their contractor(s) or consultant(s). 13.2. Each party is responsible for its own employees for any claims arising under the Workers Compensation Act. 234 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -19- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal 13.3. The County may require its contractor to carry insurance to cover claims for damages asserted against the County's contractor. 14. Nondiscrimination Provisions of Minnesota Statutes § 181.59 and of any applicable law relating to civil rights and discrimination are considered part of this Agreement. 15. Title VI/Nondiscrimination Assurances The County, Victoria, and Chanhassen agree to comply with all applicable US DOT Standard Title VI/Non- Discrimination Assurances contained in DOT Order No. 1050.2A, and in particular Appendices A and E, which can be found at: https://edocs-public.dot.state.mn.us/edocs_public/DMResultSet/download?docId=11149035. If federal funds are included in this Agreement, the County, Victoria, and Chanhassen will ensure the appendices and solicitation language within the assurances are inserted into contracts as required. The State may conduct a review of the County's, Victoria's, and Chanhassen’s compliance with this provision. The County, Victoria, and Chanhassen must cooperate with the State throughout the review process by supplying all requested information and documentation to the State, making County, Victoria, and Chanhassen staff and officials available for meetings as requested, and correcting any areas of non-compliance as determined by the State. 16. State Audits Under Minnesota Statutes § 16C.05, subdivision 5, the County's, Victoria's, and Chanhassen 's books, records, documents, accounting procedures, and practices relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the State and the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this Agreement. 17. Government Data Practices The County, Victoria, Chanhassen, and the State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to all data provided under this Agreement and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the County, Victoria, and Chanhassen under this Agreement. The civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes §13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by the County, Victoria, Chanhassen, or the State. 18. Telecommunications Certification By signing this Agreement, the County, Victoria, and Chanhassen certify that, consistent with Section 889 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, Pub. L. 115-232 (Aug. 13, 2018), and 2 CFR 200.216, the County, Victoria, and Chanhassen will not use funding covered by this Agreement to procure or obtain, or to extend, renew, or enter into any contract to procure or obtain, any equipment, system, or service that uses “covered telecommunications equipment or services” (as that term is defined in Section 889 of the Act) as a substantial or essential component of any system or as critical technology as part of any system. The County, Victoria, and Chanhassen will include this certification as a flow down clause in any contract related to this Agreement. 19. Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Venue Minnesota law governs the validity, interpretation, and enforcement of this Agreement. Venue for all legal proceedings arising out of this Agreement, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. 20. Termination; Suspension 20.1. By Mutual Agreement. This Agreement may be terminated by mutual agreement of the parties or by the State for insufficient funding as described below. 235 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -20- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal 20.2. Termination for Insufficient Funding. The State may immediately terminate this Agreement if it does not obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source; or if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services covered here. Termination must be by written or fax notice to the County, Victoria, and Chanhassen. The State is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination. However, the County, Victoria, and Chanhassen will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available. The State will not be assessed any penalty if this Agreement is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source, not to appropriate funds. 20.3. Suspension. In the event of a total or partial government shutdown, the State may suspend this Agreement and all work, activities, performance, and payments authorized through this Agreement. Any work performed during a period of suspension will be considered unauthorized work and will be undertaken at the risk of non-payment. 21. Force Majeure No party will be responsible to the other for a failure to perform under this Agreement (or a delay in performance) if such failure or delay is due to a force majeure event. A force majeure event is an event beyond a party's reasonable control, including but not limited to, unusually severe weather, fire, floods, other acts of God, labor disputes, acts of war or terrorism, or public health emergencies. (The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank.) 236 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -21- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal CITY OF VICTORIA The undersigned certify that they have lawfully executed this contract on behalf of the Governmental Unit as required by applicable charter provisions, resolutions, or ordinances. By: DRAFT – DO NOT SIGN Title: Date: By: DRAFT – DO NOT SIGN Title: Date: 237 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -22- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal CITY OF CHANHASSEN The undersigned certify that they have lawfully executed this contract on behalf of the Governmental Unit as required by applicable charter provisions, resolutions, or ordinances. By: DRAFT – DO NOT SIGN Title: Date: By: DRAFT – DO NOT SIGN Title: Date: 238 MnDOT Contract: 1058994 -23- Four-Party City-County Payable Standard with Signal STATE ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION Individual certifies that funds have been encumbered as required by Minnesota Statutes § 16A.15 and 16C.05. Signed: DRAFT – DO NOT SIGN Date: SWIFT Purchase Order: 30008232777 CARVER COUNTY The undersigned certify that they have lawfully executed this contract on behalf of the Governmental Unit as required by applicable charter provisions, resolutions, or ordinances. By: DRAFT – DO NOT SIGN Title: Date: By: DRAFT – DO NOT SIGN Title: Date: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Recommended for Approval: By: DRAFT – DO NOT SIGN (District Engineer) Date: Approved: By: DRAFT – DO NOT SIGN (State Design Engineer) Date: COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION By: DRAFT – DO NOT SIGN (With Delegated Authority) Date: INCLUDE COPY OF RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING ITS EXECUTION. 239 PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE "I" Agreement 1058994Carver County, City of Victoria, and City of ChanhassenSP 1002-124 (TH 5=121), SP 1008-113 (TH 41=12)Preliminary: September 23, 2025SP 010-596-014, SP 010-596-016, SP 010-613-009, SP 241-020-003, SP 241-090-001Federal Project STBG-CDS-RSTG-PRO-NHFP-TA 1025(262)Grading, bituminous surfacing, roundabouts, ADA improvements, retaining and noise walls, signals, TMS, lighting, pedestrian crosswalk flasher system, and Bridges 10X26, 10X27, 10X28, 10X29, !0J61, 10064, and 10065 construction located on TH 5 from 0.08 miles east of CSAH 11 to 0.29 miles east of TH 41 and on TH 41 from 0.33 miles south of TH 5 to 0.49 miles north of TH 5 and on CSAH 13 from 0.05 miles north of CSAH 18 to 0.39 miles south of TH 7to start approximately November 4, 2025 under City contract with ___STATE COST PARTICIPATIONState LPP Match State Federal STP State Match State LPP TOTALS20 Percent (1)(2) 80 Percent20 Percent No Federal AidSP 1002-124, SP 010-596-014 Work Items From Sheet 12 707,172.68 4,640,000.00 1,160,000.00 6,507,172.68SP 1002-124, SP 010-596-014 Haul Salvaged Material From Sheet 13 5,000.00 5,000.00(3) Subtotal6,512,172.68SP 1002-124, SP 010-596-014, SP 010-596-016 Work Items From Sheet 170.00SP 1008-113, SP 010-596-014 Work Items From Sheet 220.00(3) Subtotal6,512,172.68Total State Obligation$6,512,172.68Encumbered Amount$6,512,172.68(1) Matching County Federal STIP funds(2)The capped amount was reduced by the Haul Salvaged Material cost (as detailed on Sheet 13) and $287,827.32 credited for State Furnished Materials (as indicated on Sheet 23).(3) Total State LPP funds available for this project are capped at $1,000,000.00 minus State Furnished Materials cost; total State Federal STP funds available for this projectare capped at $4,640,000.00, and total State Match funds available for this project are capped at $1,160,000.00 as described in Article 9.3 of the Agreement.Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 1 -DRAFTFTRAhting, pedestrian hting, pmiles east of CSAH 11 tmiles east of Ch of CSAH 18 to 0.39 miles h of CSAH 18 to 0TICIPATIONPP MatchState Federal STPState FPercent (1)(2)Percen80 Percent80 707,172.68707,172.64,640,004,64m Sheet 17m Sheet vaged Material cost (as detailed ovaged Material cost (as detailed are capped at $1,000,000.00 miare capped at $1,000,000.00 mich funds available for thisch funds available for FTFTFTAFTAFTAFAFAFAFAFAFAARARARARARARARARARRDRDRDRDRTTTTTTTFTFTFTFTDRDRDRDRDDDDDDDDDD240 1058994(1) 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE LPP FUNDS (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL NHPP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% STATE FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL RURAL, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS(P) = PLAN QUANTITYITEM SP 1002-124, SP 010-596-014 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (1)2011.601 SETTLEMENT MONITORING LUMP SUM 1.00 200,000.00 200,000.002011.601 AS BUILTLUMP SUM 0.60 80,000.00 48,000.002016.601 CONTRACT MANAGEMENT LUMP SUM 0.60 300,000.00 180,000.002016.601 QUALITY MANAGEMENT - THERMAL PROFILING LUMP SUM 0.60 30,000.00 18,000.002016.601 QUALITY MANAGEMENT - INTELLIGENT COMPACTION LUMP SUM 0.60 30,000.00 18,000.002021.501 MOBILIZATIONLUMP SUM 0.46 5,000,000.00 2,300,000.002031.502 FIELD OFFICEEACH 0.46 100,000.00 46,000.002031.502 FIELD LABORATORY EACH 0.46 75,000.00 34,500.002101.502 CLEARINGEACH 682.00 250.00 170,500.002101.502 GRUBBINGEACH 682.00 150.00 102,300.002101.505 CLEARING(P) ACRE 6.20 6,000.00 37,200.002101.505 GRUBBING (P) ACRE 6.20 6,000.00 37,200.002102.503 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL LIN FT 98,400.00 0.85 83,640.002102.518 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL SQ FT 1,776.00 4.50 7,992.002104.502 REMOVE PIPE APRON EACH 79.00 250.00 19,750.002104.502 REMOVE CONCRETE HEADWALL EACH 7.00 150.00 1,050.002104.502 REMOVE CONCRETE NOSE EACH 5.00 1,000.00 5,000.002104.502 REMOVE WOOD POST EACH 4.00 100.00 400.002104.502 REMOVE LIGHTING UNIT EACH 1.00 500.00 500.002104.502 REMOVE GUIDE POST EACH 78.00 50.00 3,900.002104.502 REMOVE UTILITY VAULT EACH 6.00 650.00 3,900.002104.502 REMOVE CASTING EACH 1.00 250.00 250.002104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 35.00 600.00 21,000.002104.502 REMOVE DELINEATOR/MARKER EACH 15.00 30.00 450.002104.502 REMOVE SIGNEACH 120.00 55.00 6,600.002104.502 REMOVE LIGHT FOUNDATION EACH 1.00 380.00 380.002104.502 REMOVE ENERGY ABSORBING TERMINAL EACH 11.00 550.00 6,050.002104.502 SALVAGE SIGNEACH 12.00 55.00 660.002104.503 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 180.00 6.00 1,080.002104.503 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 18,382.00 2.50 45,955.002104.503 REMOVE PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 263.00 4.00 1,052.00Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 2 -DRAFT(P)(P)(P)TERMINALTERMLL DEPTH)LL DEPLL DEPTH)LL DEPTH)TFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFARARARARARADRDRDRDRDRDDDDDAFTSUSUMP SUMMP SUUMP SUMUMP LUMP SUMLUMP SEACHEACHEACHEACHEACHACREACACRELIN FTSQ FTEACEEAEATTTTTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFATTTTTTAFTT241 1058994(1) 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE LPP FUNDS (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL NHPP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% STATE FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL RURAL, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS(P) = PLAN QUANTITYITEM SP 1002-124, SP 010-596-014 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (1)2104.503 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) LIN FT 6,727.00 20.00 134,540.002104.503 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 7,819.00 4.00 31,276.002104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB LIN FT 127.00 4.00 508.002104.503 REMOVE CHAIN LINK FENCE LIN FT 103.00 10.00 1,030.002104.503 REMOVE GUARDRAIL-PLATE BEAM LIN FT 3,700.00 6.50 24,050.002104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE SLAB SQ YD 2.00 120.00 240.002104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 149.00 12.00 1,788.002104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT SQ YD 10,885.00 7.50 81,637.502104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 2,468.00 7.00 17,276.002104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 127,082.00 5.00 635,410.002104.507 REMOVE RIPRAPCU YD 195.00 55.00 10,725.002104.518 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALK SQ FT 66,032.00 1.00 66,032.002104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 29,570.00 1.50 44,355.002104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE MEDIAN SQ FT 17,372.00 2.00 34,744.002106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON (P) CU YD 213,944.00 9.00 1,925,496.002106.507 EXCAVATION - MUCK (P) CU YD 1,393.00 12.00 16,716.002106.507 EXCAVATION - CHANNEL AND POND (P) CU YD 22,142.00 15.00 332,130.002106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV) (P) CU YD 96,996.00 25.00 2,424,900.002106.507 COMMON EMBANKMENT (CV) (P) CU YD 114,270.00 8.00 914,160.002106.602 PIEZOMETEREACH 16.00 5,000.00 80,000.002106.602 CONTROL STAKEEACH 12.00 100.00 1,200.002106.602 SETTLEMENT PLATES EACH25.00 700.00 17,500.002106.604 COLUMN SUPPORTED EMBANKMENT SQ YD 647.00 600.00 388,200.002106.607 EXCAVATION SPECIAL CU YD 1,859.00 20.00 37,180.002108.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE 1 SQ YD 1,232.00 3.00 3,696.002108.604 GEOMEMBRANE SYSTEM SQ YD 9,504.00 45.00 427,680.002108.604 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE 5 SQ YD 10,755.00 3.00 32,265.002108.607 GEOFOAMCU YD 8,983.00 135.00 1,212,705.002118.507 AGGREGATE SURFACING (CV) CLASS 2 CU YD 1,744.00 80.00 139,520.002123.61 TRACTOR MOUNTED BACKHOE HOUR 80.00 250.00 20,000.002123.61 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 8.00 250.00 2,000.00Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 3 -DS 2S 2DRA(PRA(P)RA(P)(P)AF(P)(P)AF(P)AFTTTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFAFAFAARARARARARARARADRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDDDDDDAFTTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFAAFCUCUAFCU YCAFSQ FTAFTFTFTLIN FTLIN FTSQ YDSQ YDSQ YDSQ YDSQ YDSQ YDSQ YDSCU YDCUSQ FTSQ FTTTTTTTTTTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFAFAFAADAFTAFTTTTTTTTTTTTT242 1058994(1) 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE LPP FUNDS (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL NHPP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% STATE FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL RURAL, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS(P) = PLAN QUANTITYITEM SP 1002-124, SP 010-596-014 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (1)2131.506 CALCIUM CHLORIDE SOLUTION GAL 5,000.00 3.00 15,000.002211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 (P) CU YD 45,454.00 40.00 1,818,160.002211.509 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 500.00 35.00 17,500.002232.504 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (1.5") SQ YD 641.00 2.50 1,602.502232.504 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0") SQ YD 1,373.00 3.00 4,119.002301.502 DOWEL BAREACH 36.00 15.00 540.002331.603 JOINT ADHESIVELIN FT 160,779.00 0.60 96,467.402360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,C) TON 1,739.00 115.00 199,985.002360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C) TON 884.00 90.00 79,560.002360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (4,F) TON 2,169.00 110.00 238,590.002360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C) TON 519.00 100.00 51,900.002360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C) TON 7,695.00 100.00 769,500.002360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (4,B) TON 23,173.00 90.00 2,085,570.002360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (4,F) TON 27,043.00 110.00 2,974,730.002401.503 TYPE MOD P-1 BARRIER CONC (3S52) (P) LIN FT 1,006.00 150.00 150,900.002411.507 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE (1G52) (P) CU YD 45.00 800.00 36,000.002411.507 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE (3B52) (P) CU YD 175.00 1,250.00 218,750.002411.507 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE (3G52) (P) CU YD 65.00 1,500.00 97,500.002411.508 REINFORCEMENT BARS (P) POUND 4,620.00 1.65 7,623.002411.508 REINFORCEMENT BARS (EPOXY COATED) (P) POUND 59,320.00 1.75 103,810.002411.601 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION LUMP SUM 0.20 500,000.00 100,000.002411.604REINFORCED SOIL SLOPE (P) SQ YD 605.00 175.00 105,875.002411.618 PREFABRICATED MODULAR BLOCK WALL (P) SQ FT 10,058.00 100.00 1,005,800.002411.618 CONCRETE ABSORPTIVE NOISE WALL (P) SQ FT 19,720.00 105.00 2,070,600.002411.618 * ANTI-GRAFFITI COATING (P) SQ FT 11,879.00 1.50 17,818.502411.618 * ARCHITECTURAL SURFACE FINISH (MULTI COLOR) SQ FT 470.00 5.00 2,350.002411.618 * ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE TEXTURE (CUT STONE) (P) SQ FT 470.00 35.00 16,450.002412.503 6X4 PRECAST CONCRETE BOX CULVERT LIN FT 72.00 1,000.00 72,000.002412.503 14X10 PRECAST CONCRETE BOX CULVERT (P) LIN FT 137.00 1,000.00 137,000.002451.507 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION CLASS U CU YD 5,877.00 30.00 176,310.002451.507 GRANULAR BACKFILL (CV) CU YD 329.00 40.00 13,160.00Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 4 -DLVERTLVERTDRAFT(P)(P)(P)(P)(P)(P)(PLLLSH (MULTI COLOR)SH (MULTI COLOR)EXTURE (CUT STONE)EXTURE (CUT STONE)LVERTLVERTTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFARARARARARADRDRDRDRDRDDDDDAFTYDYDSQ YDSQ YDEACHEACHLIN FTLIN FTTONTONTONTTONTOTONTONTONLIN LCUCUTTTTTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFAAFTTTTTTTT243 1058994(1) 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE LPP FUNDS (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL NHPP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% STATE FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL RURAL, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS(P) = PLAN QUANTITYITEM SP 1002-124, SP 010-596-014 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (1)2451.507 COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE (CV) CU YD 2,619.00 80.00 209,520.002451.507 FINE FILTER AGGREGATE (CV) CU YD 354.00 50.00 17,700.002451.507 FINE AGGREGATE BEDDING (CV) CU YD 2,116.00 40.00 84,640.002451.607 MEDIUM FILTER AGGREGATE (CV) CU YD 2,716.00 65.00 176,540.002451.607 STRUCTURAL BACKFILL CU YD 8,172.00 45.00 367,740.002452.601 STEEL SHEET PILING (TEMPORARY) LUMP SUM 0.30 600,000.00 180,000.002481.601 MEMBRANE WATERPROOFING SYSTEM LUMP SUM 0.25 120,000.00 30,000.002501.502 15" CS PIPE APRON EACH 3.00 525.00 1,575.002501.502 18" CS PIPE APRON EACH 5.00 600.00 3,000.002501.502 24" CS PIPE APRON EACH 1.00 800.00 800.002501.502 12" CAS PIPE APRON EACH 2.00 450.00 900.002501.502 12" RC PIPE APRON EACH 1.00 1,000.00 1,000.002501.502 15" RC PIPE APRON EACH 18.00 1,200.00 21,600.002501.502 18" RC PIPE APRON EACH 11.00 1,500.00 16,500.002501.502 24" RC PIPE APRON EACH 15.00 1,900.00 28,500.002501.502 30" RC PIPE APRON EACH 4.00 2,500.00 10,000.002501.502 36" RC PIPE APRON EACH 9.00 3,500.00 31,500.002501.502 48" RC PIPE APRON EACH 1.00 5,000.00 5,000.002501.502 28" SPAN RC PIPE-ARCH APRON EACH 1.00 2,250.00 2,250.002501.502 44" SPAN RC PIPE-ARCH APRON EACH 2.00 3,500.00 7,000.002501.503 12" CAS PIPE CULVERT LIN FT 34.00 70.00 2,380.002501.503 15" RC PIPE CULVERT DESIGN 3006 CLASS V LIN FT 56.00 95.00 5,320.002501.503 24" RC PIPE CULVERT DESIGN 3006 CLASS IIILIN FT 178.00 125.00 22,250.002501.503 30" RC PIPE CULVERT DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 151.00 150.00 22,650.002501.503 36" RC PIPE CULVERT DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 415.00 175.00 72,625.002501.503 36" RC PIPE CULVERT DESIGN 3006 CLASS IV LIN FT 242.00 175.00 42,350.002501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 15" PIPE APRON EACH 7.00 1,000.00 7,000.002501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 18" PIPE APRON EACH 1.00 1,250.00 1,250.002501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 24" PIPE APRON EACH 6.00 1,500.00 9,000.002501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 30" PIPE APRON EACH 2.00 2,100.00 4,200.002502.503 4" TP PIPE DRAINLIN FT 1,300.00 15.00 19,500.00Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 5 -DRAFTVS IIIASS IIIASS IIICLASS IIICLAS06 CLASS IV06 CLRONRONNNTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFARARARARARADRDRDRDRDRDDDDAFTDDYDYDCU YDCU YDLUMP SUMLUMP SLUMP SUMLUMP SUMEACHEACHEACHEEACHEAEACHEACHEACHEACEEAEATTTTTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFATTTTTTDAFTT244 1058994(1) 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE LPP FUNDS (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL NHPP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% STATE FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL RURAL, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS(P) = PLAN QUANTITYITEM SP 1002-124, SP 010-596-014 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (1)2502.503 8" TP PIPE DRAINLIN FT 491.00 25.00 12,275.002502.503 8" PERF TP PIPE DRAIN (MOD) LIN FT 2,408.00 25.00 60,200.002502.503 4" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 50,035.00 15.00 750,525.002502.602 8" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH 26.00 550.00 14,300.002503.503 15" CS PIPE SEWER LIN FT 479.00 70.00 33,530.002503.503 18" CS PIPE SEWER LIN FT 920.00 100.00 92,000.002503.503 24" CS PIPE SEWER LIN FT 284.00 150.00 42,600.002503.503 28" SPAN RC PIPE-ARCH SEWER CLASS IIIA LIN FT 5.00 250.00 1,250.002503.503 36" SPAN RC PIPE-ARCH SEWER CLASS IIIA LIN FT 118.00 275.00 32,450.002503.503 44" SPAN RC PIPE-ARCH SEWER CLASS IIIA LIN FT 105.00 350.00 36,750.002503.503 12" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V LIN FT 360.00 75.00 27,000.002503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V LIN FT 15,134.00 80.00 1,210,720.002503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 2,939.00 85.00 249,815.002503.503 24" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 3,545.00 100.00 354,500.002503.503 24" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS IV LIN FT 458.00 125.00 57,250.002503.503 30" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 2,279.00 150.00 341,850.002503.503 36" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 554.00 175.00 96,950.002503.503 48" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 70.00 350.00 24,500.002503.503 36" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V-JACKED LIN FT 159.00 1,400.00 222,600.002503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 34.00 3,000.00 102,000.002503.603 PLUG FILL AND ABANDON PIPE SEWER LIN FT 138.00 20.00 2,760.002503.603 36" STEEL CASING PIPE LIN FT 55.00 700.00 38,500.002503.603 10" HDPE PIPE SEWERLIN FT 186.00 75.00 13,950.002503.603 15" HDPE PIPE SEWER LIN FT 209.00 150.00 31,350.002503.603 36" HDPE PIPE SEWER LIN FT 21.00 200.00 4,200.002503.603 60" HDPE PIPE SEWER LIN FT 1,630.00 350.00 570,500.002506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 437.00 1,200.00 524,400.002506.502 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 14.00 800.00 11,200.002506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN G LIN FT 421.00 560.00 235,760.002506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN H LIN FT 27.00 450.00 12,150.002506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SD-48 LIN FT 60.00 750.00 45,000.00Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 6 -DRAFTCHCHLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTLLIN FTLILIN FTLIN FTLIN FTLIN LLILINGNGE DESIGN GE DESIESIGN HESIGN HIGN SDIGN SDTTTTTTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAARARARARARADRDRDRDRDRDDDDDAFTTTTTTTT245 1058994(1) 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE LPP FUNDS (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL NHPP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% STATE FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL RURAL, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS(P) = PLAN QUANTITYITEM SP 1002-124, SP 010-596-014 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (1)2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SD-60 LIN FT 7.00 1,000.00 7,000.002506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020 LIN FT 1,392.00 600.00 835,200.002506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 60-4020 LIN FT 380.00 1,000.00 380,000.002506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 72-4020 LIN FT 45.00 1,200.00 54,000.002506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 84-4020 LIN FT 33.00 1,500.00 49,500.002506.503 RECONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE LIN FT 9.00 1,500.00 13,500.002506.602 CONNECT INTO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 6.00 3,000.00 18,000.002506.602 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 2 EACH 3.00 30,000.00 90,000.002506.602 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 3 EACH 16.00 25,000.00 400,000.002506.602 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 4 EACH 6.00 30,000.00 180,000.002506.602 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 5 EACH 7.00 30,000.00 210,000.002506.602 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 6 EACH 1.00 5,000.00 5,000.002506.602 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 7 EACH 2.00 1,000.00 2,000.002506.602 MANHOLE RISER COVER PLATE EACH 2.00 750.00 1,500.002506.602 CASTING ASSEMBLY SPECIAL 1 EACH 22.00 3,000.00 66,000.002506.603 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 1 LIN FT 25.00 450.00 11,250.002511.504 GEOTEXTILE FILTER TYPE 4 SQ YD 1,995.00 5.00 9,975.002511.504 GEOTEXTILE FILTER TYPE 7 SQ YD 69.00 5.00 345.002511.507 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III CU YD 1,017.00 135.00 137,295.002511.507 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS IV CU YD 138.00 135.00 18,630.002511.507 GRANULAR FILTER CU YD 52.00 55.00 2,860.002521.518 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 148,641.00 6.50 966,166.502521.518 6" CONCRETE WALKSQ FT 5,953.00 10.00 59,530.002521.518 7" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 1,272.00 12.00 15,264.002521.602 DRILL AND GROUT REINF BAR (EPOXY COATED) EACH 606.00 20.00 12,120.002521.618 CONCRETE CURB RAMP WALK SQ FT 9,860.00 16.00 157,760.002531.503 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B412 LIN FT 231.00 30.00 6,930.002531.503 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B424 LIN FT 55,361.00 30.00 1,660,830.002531.503 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B612 LIN FT 503.00 26.00 13,078.002531.503 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B618 LIN FT 1,617.00 24.00 38,808.002531.503 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B624 LIN FT 9,238.00 25.00 230,950.00Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 7 -DRAFTOXY COATED)OXY COATED)DESIGN B412DESIGESIGN B424ESIGNGN B612GN B6N B618N B618624624TFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFARARARARARADRDRDRDRDRDDDDDAFTFTFTLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTEACHEACHEACHEACHEACHEEACHEAEACHEACHEACHEACELILITTTTTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFAAFTTTTTTTT246 1058994(1) 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE LPP FUNDS (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL NHPP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% STATE FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL RURAL, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS(P) = PLAN QUANTITYITEM SP 1002-124, SP 010-596-014 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (1)2531.503 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN D424 LIN FT 432.00 $33.00 14,256.002531.503 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN R424 LIN FT 358.00 35.00 12,530.002531.503 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN S524 LIN FT 738.00 30.00 22,140.002531.504 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 427.00 90.00 38,430.002531.504 8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 691.00 120.00 82,920.002531.603 CONCRETE SILLLIN FT 180.00 20.00 3,600.002531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 852.00 55.00 46,860.002533.503 CONC MED BAR DES SINGLE SLOPE TYPE 42A LIN FT 222.00 150.00 33,300.002533.503 CONC MED BAR DES SGL SLOPE TYPE 42A STEP LIN FT 144.00 300.00 43,200.002533.503 PORTABLE PRECAST CONCRETE BARRIER DESIGN 8337 LIN FT 9,465.00 18.00 170,370.002533.503 PORTABLE PRECAST CONCRETE BARRIER DES 8337-ANCHORED LIN FT 4,790.00 32.00 153,280.002533.503 RELOCATE PORTABLE PRECAST CONCRETE BARRIER DESIGN 8337 LIN FT 3,250.00 18.00 58,500.002533.503 RELOCATE PORTABLE PRECAST CONCRETE BARRIER DES 8337-ANCHORED LIN FT 1,380.00 30.00 41,400.002540.602 MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 16.00 220.00 3,520.002545.501 LIGHTING SYSTEM "A" LUMP SUM 1.00 117,000.00 117,000.002545.501 CONDUIT SYSTEM TYPE 1 LUMP SUM 0.20 100,000.00 20,000.002545.502 LIGHT FOUNDATION DESIGN E MODIFIED EACH 1.00 1,750.00 1,750.002550.502 SERVICE FOUNDATION EACH 1.00 1,500.00 1,500.002550.502 CCTV FOUNDATION EACH 1.00 4,250.00 4,250.002550.502 FIBEROPTIC SPLICE VAULT EACH 2.00 4,100.00 8,200.002550.502 OUTDOOR FIBER SPLICE ENCLOSURE EACH 5.00 1,625.00 8,125.002550.502 CCTV CABINETEACH 1.00 4,000.00 4,000.002550.502 SERVICE CABINETEACH 1.00 3,500.00 3,500.002550.503 1.5" NON-METALLIC CONDUIT LIN FT 15,666.00 4.40 68,930.402550.503 2" NON-METALLIC CONDUIT LIN FT 19.00 8.00 152.002550.503 POWER CABLE 1 CONDUCTOR NO 2 LIN FT 33.00 6.00 198.002550.503 POWER CABLE 3 CONDUCTOR NO 14 LIN FT 150.00 3.00 450.002550.601 REMOVE CABLESLUMP SUM 0.90 11,250.00 10,125.002550.601 TEMPORARY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM LUMP SUM 0.90 10,000.00 9,000.002550.601 FIBER OPTIC CABLE TESTING LUMP SUM 0.90 10,000.00 9,000.002550.602 FIBER OPTIC SPLICE / PATCH PANEL EACH 1.00 5,200.00 5,200.00Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 8 -DRAFTYDYDSQ YDSQ YDLIN FTLIN FTSQ FTSQ FTLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTLLIN FTLILIN FTNCHOREDLIN FTEACHLUMLLULUO 2O 2NO 14NO 14TEMTEMTTTTTTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAARARARARARADRDRDRDRDRDDDDDAFTTTTTTTT247 1058994(1) 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE LPP FUNDS (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL NHPP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% STATE FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL RURAL, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS(P) = PLAN QUANTITYITEM SP 1002-124, SP 010-596-014 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (1)2550.602 FIBER OPTIC PIGTAIL TERMINATION EACH 5.00 1,200.00 6,000.002550.602 FIBER OPTIC CABLE SPLICING EACH 6.00 1,750.00 10,500.002550.602 BURIED CABLE SIGN EACH 72.00 130.00 9,360.002550.602 PULL VAULTEACH 10.00 1,600.00 16,000.002550.602 NON-INTRUSIVE DETECTION HARDWARE EACH 1.00 35,000.00 35,000.002550.603 ARMORED FIBER OPTIC PIGTAIL 6SM LIN FT 1,355.00 1.70 2,303.502550.603 FIBER OPTIC TRUNK CABLE 36SM LIN FT 20,312.00 2.00 40,624.002550.603 1.5" BORED CONDUIT LIN FT 3,817.00 14.00 53,438.002550.603 2" BORED CONDUIT LIN FT 537.00 20.00 10,740.002554.502 ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLY - TYPE 31 EACH 4.00 4,000.00 16,000.002554.502 END TREATMENT-TANGENT TERMINAL EACH 5.00 3,600.00 18,000.002554.503 TRAFFIC BARRIER DESIGN TYPE 31 LIN FT 3,264.00 35.00 114,240.002554.503 TRAFFIC BARRIER DESIGN TRANSITION TYPE 31 LIN FT 37.50 130.00 4,875.002554.603 GUIDE POST TYPE SPECIAL EACH 114.00 140.00 15,960.002554.615 IMPACT ATTENUATOR ASSEMBLY 2.00 44,000.00 88,000.002557.502 ELECTRICAL GROUND EACH 1.00 600.00 600.002557.503 WIRE FENCE DESIGN SPECIAL VINYL COATED (P) LIN FT 1,466.00 150.00 219,900.002557.503 WIRE FENCE DESIGN 72-9322 LIN FT 193.00 40.00 7,720.002563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPERVISOR LUMP SUM 1.00 60,000.00 60,000.002563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 0.46 350,000.00 161,000.002563.601 ALTERNATE PEDESTRIAN ROUTE LUMP SUM 0.30 40,000.00 12,000.002563.602 TRAFFIC CONTROL (SPECIAL) EACH 4.00 1,500.00 6,000.002563.602PORTABLE BARRIER DELINEATOR EACH 755.00 10.00 7,550.002563.602 VEHICLE SPEED FEEDBACK SIGN EACH 4.00 5,500.00 22,000.002563.613 PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN EACH 4.00 5,000.00 20,000.002563.615 TEMPORARY IMPACT ATTENUATOR ASSEMBLY 17.00 3,500.00 59,500.002563.615 RELOCATE TEMPORARY IMPACT ATTENUATOR ASSEMBLY 16.00 1,200.00 19,200.002564.502 INFILTRATION AREA MARKER EACH 20.00 400.00 8,000.002564.602 INSTALL SIGNEACH 12.00 490.00 5,880.002564.602 DELINEATOR/MARKER EACH 9.00 235.00 2,115.002564.602 DELINEATOR/MARKER PANEL EACH 27.00 110.00 2,970.00Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 9 -DRT ATTENUATORT ATTDRTORTORDRE SIGNE SIGNDRA(P)(P)AFTTTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFAFAFAARARARARARARARADRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDDDDDDAFTTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFADAFTAFEAEAAFASSEAAFTCHCHEACHEACHLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTEACHEEACHEALIN FTLIN FTEACHTTTTTTTTTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFAFAFAAAFTTTTTTTTTTTTT248 1058994(1) 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE LPP FUNDS (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL NHPP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% STATE FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL RURAL, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS(P) = PLAN QUANTITYITEM SP 1002-124, SP 010-596-014 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (1)2564.618 SIGNSQ FT 1,846.00 85.00 156,910.002565.501 EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION SYSTEM A LUMP SUM 0.50 9,100.00 4,550.002565.501 EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION SYSTEM B LUMP SUM 0.50 9,400.00 4,700.002565.501 EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION SYSTEM C LUMP SUM 0.50 8,800.00 4,400.002565.501 EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION SYSTEM D LUMP SUM 0.50 9,700.00 4,850.002565.516 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM A SYSTEM 0.50 659,200.00 329,600.002565.516 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM B SYSTEM 0.50 721,300.00 360,650.002565.516 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM C SYSTEM 0.50 643,200.00 321,600.002565.516 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM D SYSTEM 0.50 761,800.00 380,900.002572.503 TEMPORARY FENCE LIN FT 9,507.00 3.00 28,521.002572.503 CLEAN ROOT CUTTING LIN FT 7,764.00 7.00 54,348.002573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LUMP SUM 1.00 25,000.00 25,000.002573.501 EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR LUMP SUM 1.00 40,000.00 40,000.002573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 427.00 190.00 81,130.002573.502 CULVERT END CONTROLS EACH 27.00 200.00 5,400.002573.503 SILT FENCE, TYPE SD LIN FT 1,750.00 35.00 61,250.002573.503 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS LIN FT 21,776.00 2.50 54,440.002573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER LIN FT 2,278.00 3.00 6,834.002574.505 SUBSOILING (P) ACRE 31.00 350.00 10,850.002574.505 SOIL BED PREPARATION (P) ACRE 45.00 230.00 10,350.002574.507 FILTER TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD 2,716.00 60.00 162,960.002574.508 FERTILIZER TYPE 1 POUND 1,967.00 1.00 1,967.002574.508 FERTILIZER TYPE 3 POUND 3,742.00 1.00 3,742.002574.508 FERTILIZER TYPE 4 POUND 214.00 1.50 321.002575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 SQ YD 24,637.00 2.00 49,274.002575.504 ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 10 SQ YD 22,777.00 2.00 45,554.002575.504 ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 25 SQ YD 1,860.00 2.00 3,720.002575.505 SEEDING(P) ACRE 30.00 300.00 9,000.002575.505 DISK ANCHORING (P) ACRE 24.00 100.00 2,400.002575.505 WEED SPRAYINGACRE 15.00 300.00 4,500.002575.506 WEED SPRAY MIXTURE GALLON 2.00 100.00 200.00Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 10 -DRAFTSUSUMP SUMMP SULUMP SUMLUMP SYSTEMSYSTEMSYSTEMSYSTEMSYSTEMMSYSTEMLIN FTLLIN FTLILUMP SUMLUMP SUMEACHEACELILI(PCATEGORY 10CATE CATEGORY 25 CATETTTTTTTTFTFTTFTFTTFTFTTFTFTAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAARARARARARADRDRDRDRDRDDDDDAFTT249 1058994(1) 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE LPP FUNDS (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL NHPP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% STATE FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL RURAL, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS(P) = PLAN QUANTITYITEM SP 1002-124, SP 010-596-014 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (1)2575.509 MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 3 TON 49.00 95.00 4,655.002575.523 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 3 M GALLON 286.00 550.00 157,300.002575.608 SEED SOUTHERN BOULEVARD POUND 591.00 4.50 2,659.502575.608 SEED RESIDENTIAL TURFGRASS POUND 982.00 25.00 24,550.002575.608 SEED WET DITCHPOUND 27.00 25.00 675.002575.608 SEED SOUTHERN SHORTGRASS ROADSIDE POUND 525.00 4.50 2,362.502575.608 SEED SOUTHERN TALLGRASS ROADSIDE POUND 261.00 4.50 1,174.502580.603 PAVEMENT MARKING - LATE SEASON LIN FT 3,000.00 2.00 6,000.002580.618 PAVEMENT MESSAGE - LATE SEASON SQ FT 700.00 10.00 7,000.002581.503 4" REMOVABLE PREFORMED PAVEMENT MARKING TAPE LIN FT 2,000.00 4.00 8,000.002581.503 6" REMOVABLE PREFORMED PAVEMENT MARKING TAPE LIN FT 1,500.00 5.00 7,500.002581.618 REMOVABLE PREFORMED PLASTIC MASK (BLACK) SQ FT 1,500.00 6.50 9,750.002582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT (WR) LIN FT 111,500.00 0.20 22,300.002582.503 6" SOLID LINE PAINT (WR) LIN FT 6,315.00 0.50 3,157.502582.503 24" SOLID LINE PAINT (WR) LIN FT 600.00 10.00 6,000.002582.503 4" BROKEN LINE PAINT (WR) LIN FT 21,500.00 0.20 4,300.002582.503 4" DOTTED LINE PAINT (WR) LIN FT 1,900.00 0.70 1,330.002582.503 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE PAINT (WR) LIN FT 35,500.00 0.65 23,075.002582.503 4" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 3,650.00 2.00 7,300.002582.503 6" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 11,200.00 4.00 44,800.002582.503 10" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 720.00 6.00 4,320.002582.503 24" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 230.00 22.00 5,060.002582.503 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENTLIN FT 2,090.00 1.75 3,657.502582.503 6" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN (WR) LIN FT 59,770.00 1.50 89,655.002582.503 6" DOUBLE SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN (WR) LIN FT 1,220.00 2.00 2,440.002582.503 6" SOLID LINE PREFORM TAPE GROUND IN LIN FT 7,730.00 8.50 65,705.002582.503 10" SOLID LINE PREFORM TAPE GROUND IN LIN FT 5,750.00 13.00 74,750.002582.503 6" BROKEN LINE PREFORM TAPE GROUND IN LIN FT 6,665.00 7.00 46,655.002582.503 24" SOLID LINE PREFORM THERMO GROUND IN LIN FT 1,400.00 28.00 39,200.002582.503 4" DOTTED LINE PREFORM THERMO GROUND IN LIN FT 200.00 5.50 1,100.002582.503 12" DOTTED LINE PREFORM THERMO GROUND IN LIN FT 100.00 23.00 2,300.00Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 11 -DUND INUND INDOUND INOUND INDRAFTENTROUND IN (WR)ROUND IN (WR)MPONENT GROUND IN (WR)MPONENT GROUND IN (WROUND INROUNGROUND INGROUGROUND IN GROUNROUND INROUNTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFARARARARARADRDRDRDRDRDDAFTDDUNDUNDOUNDOUNDPOUNDPOUNDPOUNDPOUNDLIN FTSQ FTLIN FTLLIN FTLISQ FTLIN FTLIN FTLIN LLILITTTTTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFADDDAFTTTTTTTT250 1058994(1) 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE LPP FUNDS (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL NHPP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% STATE FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL RURAL, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS(P) = PLAN QUANTITYITEM SP 1002-124, SP 010-596-014 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (1)2582.518 PAVEMENT MESSAGE PAINT SQ FT 614.00 10.00 6,140.002582.518 PAVEMENT MESSAGE PREFORM THERMOPLASTIC GROUND IN SQ FT 1,251.00 28.00 35,028.002582.518 CROSSWALK PAINT SQ FT 432.00 10.00 4,320.002582.518 CROSSWALK PREFORM THERMOPLASTIC GROUND IN SQ FT 4,320.00 15.50 66,960.00TOTAL 42,528,317.80(1) COUNTY FEDERAL STP FUNDS 3,535,863.4080% COUNTY FEDERAL STP 2,828,690.72 (CAPPED)20% STATE LPP MATCH** 707,172.68 (CAPPED)COUNTY FEDERAL STP FUNDS 10,936,464.3080% COUNTY FEDERAL STP 8,749,171.44 (CAPPED)20% STATE GENERAL MATCH 2,187,292.86 (CAPPED)COUNTY FEDERAL NHPP FUNDS 13,500,000.0080% COUNTY FEDERAL NHPP 10,800,000.00 (CAPPED)20% STATE GENERAL MATCH 2,700,000.00 (CAPPED)STATE FEDERAL STP FUNDS 5,800,000.0080% STATE FEDERAL STP*** 4,640,000.00 (CAPPED)20% STATE MATCH**** 1,160,000.00 (CAPPED)COUNTY FEDERAL RURAL FUNDS 7,282,685.7480% COUNTY FEDERAL RURAL 5,826,148.59 (CAPPED)20% STATE GENERAL 1,456,537.15 (CAPPED)REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS 1,473,304.36*The total of aesthetic items for this Project is within the Project's Aesthetic Budget of $68,000.00 (capped).**Total State LPP funds available for this category: $707,172.68. This includes deduction of the $287,827.32 credit for State Furnished Materials (see Sheet 23).***Total State Federal STP funds available for this category: $4,640,000.00****Total State Match Funds available for this category: $1,160,000.00Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 12 -Dor this category: $1,160,00or this category: $1,160DRailable for this category: $4,640,0ailable for this category: $4DRthis category: $707,172.68. This inthis category: $707,172.68. This inDRect is within the Project's Aesthetic ect is within the Project's AestDRRDRRDERDRDRDRDRDRDDDDDDDDRRDRRA20%RRARRA0% CRRACOUNTY FEDERRARRA20%RRARRA80% STATE FERRAFEDERAL STP FUNAF0% STATE GENERAAF80% COUNTY FEDAFTY FEDERAL NHPP FAFATE GEAFTCOUNTY FEDFTERAL STP FUNDSFTSTATE LPP MFTUNTY FEDERAL STPTFTTP FUTFTFTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAARARARARARARARARARADRDR251 1058994(2) 100% STATE LPP FUNDSITEM SP 1002-124, SP 010-596-014 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (2)2104.601 HAUL SALVAGED MATERIAL LUMP SUM 1.00 5,000.00 5,000.00TOTAL 5,000.00(2)100% STATE LPP* 5,000.00 (CAPPED)*TOTAL STATE LPP FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR THIS CATEGORY: $5,000.00Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 13 -DRAFTTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFARARARARARADRDRDRDRDRAFTTTTTTTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFATTTTTTDDAFTTDD252 1058994(3) 80% COUNTY FEDERAL PROTECT, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL RURAL, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS(P) = PLAN QUANTITYITEM SP 1002-124, SP 010-596-014, SP 010-596-016 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (3)2011.601 AS BUILTLUMP SUM 0.20 80,000.00 16,000.002016.601 CONTRACT MANAGEMENT LUMP SUM 0.20 300,000.00 60,000.002016.601 QUALITY MANAGEMENT - THERMAL PROFILING LUMP SUM 0.20 30,000.00 6,000.002016.601 QUALITY MANAGEMENT - INTELLIGENT COMPACTION LUMP SUM 0.20 30,000.00 6,000.002021.501 MOBILIZATIONLUMP SUM 0.21 5,000,000.00 1,050,000.002031.502 FIELD OFFICEEACH 0.21 100,000.00 21,000.002031.502 FIELD LABORATORY EACH 0.21 75,000.00 15,750.002101.502 CLEARINGEACH 223.00 250.00 55,750.002101.502 GRUBBINGEACH 223.00 150.00 33,450.002101.505 CLEARING(P) ACRE 1.80 6,000.00 10,800.002101.505 GRUBBING(P) ACRE 1.80 6,000.00 10,800.002104.502 REMOVE PIPE APRON EACH 12.00 250.00 3,000.002104.502 REMOVE GUIDE POST EACH 12.00 50.00 600.002104.502 REMOVE DELINEATOR/MARKER EACH 2.00 30.00 60.002104.502 REMOVE SIGNEACH 23.00 55.00 1,265.002104.502 REMOVE ENERGY ABSORBING TERMINAL EACH 1.00 550.00 550.002104.503 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 47.00 2.50 117.502104.503 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) LIN FT 807.00 20.00 16,140.002104.503 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 1,150.00 4.00 4,600.002104.503 REMOVE GUARDRAIL-PLATE BEAM LIN FT 738.00 6.50 4,797.002104.503 REMOVE CATTLE PASS LIN FT 57.00 75.00 4,275.002104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 99.00 7.00 693.002104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 22,980.00 5.00 114,900.002104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE MEDIAN SQ FT 934.00 2.00 1,868.002106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON (P) CU YD 72,115.00 9.00 649,035.002106.507 EXCAVATION - MUCK (P) CU YD 399.00 12.00 4,788.002106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV) (P) CU YD 16,165.00 25.00 404,125.002106.507 COMMON EMBANKMENT (CV) (P) CU YD 23,954.00 8.00 191,632.002106.604 COLUMN SUPPORTED EMBANKMENT SQ YD 12,151.00 600.00 7,290,600.002211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 (P) CU YD 7,022.00 40.00 280,880.002231.604 BITUMINOUS PATCH SPECIAL SQ YD 174.00 50.00 8,700.002301.502 DOWEL BAREACH 300.00 15.00 4,500.002331.603 JOINT ADHESIVELIN FT 44,776.00 0.60 26,865.60Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 14 -DNTNTDRNT (CV)NT (CVDRATTRAFT(P)(P)(P)TFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFARARARARARADRDRDRDRDRDDDDDFT S SMP SUMMP SUEACHEACHEACHEACHEACHEACHEACHACREACREEACHEEACHEACHEACHEACLLTTTTTTTTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFFFFFFFTTTTTTTT253 1058994(3) 80% COUNTY FEDERAL PROTECT, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL RURAL, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS(P) = PLAN QUANTITYITEM SP 1002-124, SP 010-596-014, SP 010-596-016 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (3)2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C) TON 105.00 90.00 9,450.002360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C) TON 89.00 100.00 8,900.002360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (4,B) TON 5,429.00 90.00 488,610.002360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (4,F) TON 7,238.00 110.00 796,180.002401.503 TYPE MOD S (TL-4) BARRIER CONC (3S52) LIN FT 3,178.00 120.00 381,360.002406.504 BRIDGE APPROACH PANELS SQ YD 324.00 350.00 113,400.002406.603 EXPANSION JOINTS; DESIGN E5 LIN FT 146.00 160.00 23,360.002411.507 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE (1G52) (P) CU YD 194.00 800.00 155,200.002411.507 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE (3B52)(P) CU YD 1,113.00 1,250.00 1,391,250.002411.507 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE (3G52) (P) CU YD 174.00 1,500.00 261,000.002411.508 REINFORCEMENT BARS (P) POUND 21,695.00 1.65 35,796.752411.508 REINFORCEMENT BARS (EPOXY COATED) (P) POUND 229,211.00 1.75 401,119.252411.604 REINFORCED SOIL SLOPE (P) SQ YD 3,165.00 175.00 553,875.002411.618 * ANTI-GRAFFITI COATING (P) SQ FT 1,841.00 1.50 2,761.502411.618 * ARCHITECTURAL SURFACE FINISH (MULTI COLOR) SQ FT 1,841.00 5.00 9,205.002411.618 * ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE TEXTURE (ASHLAR STONE) SQ FT 1,841.00 20.00 36,820.002451.507 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION CLASS U CU YD 2,140.00 30.00 64,200.002451.507 GRANULAR BACKFILL (CV) CU YD 42.00 40.00 1,680.002451.507 FINE AGGREGATE BEDDING (CV) CU YD 292.00 40.00 11,680.002451.607 STRUCTURAL BACKFILL CU YD 11,633.00 45.00 523,485.002452.502 C-I-P CONCRETE TEST PILE 105 FT LONG 12" EACH 3.0015,000.00 45,000.002452.503 C-I-P CONCRETE PILING 12" LIN FT 5,035.00 65.00 327,275.002501.502 15" RC PIPE APRONEACH 1.00 1,200.00 1,200.002501.502 24" RC PIPE APRONEACH 6.00 1,900.00 11,400.002501.502 42" RC SAFETY APRON AND GRATE DESIGN 3132 EACH 2.00 4,000.00 8,000.002501.503 24" RC PIPE CULVERT DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 122.00 125.00 15,250.002501.503 42" RC PIPE CULVERT DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 154.00 200.00 30,800.002501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 15" PIPE APRON EACH 1.00 1,000.00 1,000.002501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 24" PIPE APRON EACH 1.00 1,500.00 1,500.002502.503 4" TP PIPE DRAINLIN FT 295.00 15.00 4,425.002502.503 4" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 9,486.00 15.00 142,290.002502.601 DRAINAGE SYSTEM LUMP SUM 0.25 50,000.00 12,500.002503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V LIN FT 3,523.00 80.00 281,840.00Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 15 -DRAFT)(P)(P)(P)(P)(P)(P)(P)P)(P)(P)SIGN 3132SIGN 3132CLASS IIICLASS6 CLASS III6 CLARONRONNNTTTTFTFTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFARARARARARARARARARADRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDDDDDDFTN FTN FTSQ YDSQ YDLIN FTLIN FTCU YDYDCU YDCU YDPOUNDPOUNDPSQ YDSQ FTSQ FTSQ FCCTTTTTTTTFTFTFTFTFTFTFFFFFFFFTTTTTTTT254 1058994(3) 80% COUNTY FEDERAL PROTECT, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL RURAL, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS(P) = PLAN QUANTITYITEM SP 1002-124, SP 010-596-014, SP 010-596-016 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (3)2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 1,585.00 85.00 134,725.002503.503 24" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 1,638.00 100.00 163,800.002506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 114.00 1,200.00 136,800.002506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN G LIN FT 168.00 560.00 94,080.002506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020 LIN FT 346.00 600.00 207,600.002506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 60-4020 LIN FT 8.00 1,000.00 8,000.002506.602 CONNECT INTO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 2.00 3,000.00 6,000.002506.602 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 3 EACH 3.00 25,000.00 75,000.002506.602 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 4 EACH 2.00 30,000.00 60,000.002511.504 GEOTEXTILE FILTER TYPE 4 SQ YD 296.00 5.00 1,480.002511.507 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III CU YD 85.00 135.00 11,475.002521.518 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 197.00 6.50 1,280.502521.518 6" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 14.00 10.00 140.002531.503 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B424 LIN FT 6,219.00 30.00 186,570.002531.503 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN D424 LIN FT 203.00 33.00 6,699.002531.504 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 19.00 90.00 1,710.002533.503 CONC MED BAR DES SINGLE SLOPE TYPE 42A LIN FT 2,073.00 150.00 310,950.002533.503 CONC MED BAR DES SGL SLOPE TYPE 42A STEP LIN FT 2,119.00 300.00 635,700.002533.503 CONC MED BAR DES SGL SLOPE TYPE 42 TRANS LIN FT 20.00 350.00 7,000.002545.501 LIGHTING SYSTEM "D" LUMP SUM 1.00 39,000.00 39,000.002554.502 END TREATMENT-TANGENT TERMINAL EACH 1.00 3,600.00 3,600.002554.503 TRAFFIC BARRIER DESIGN TYPE 31 LIN FT 388.00 35.00 13,580.002554.503 TRAFFIC BARRIER DESIGN TRANSITION TYPE 31LIN FT 37.50 130.00 4,875.002554.603 GUIDE POST TYPE SPECIAL EACH 17.00 140.00 2,380.002557.502 ELECTRICAL GROUND EACH 5.00 600.00 3,000.002557.503 WIRE FENCE DESIGN SPECIAL LIN FT 1,617.00 72.00 116,424.002563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROLLUMP SUM 0.21 350,000.00 73,500.002564.618 SIGNSQ FT 39.00 85.00 3,315.002572.503 TEMPORARY FENCE LIN FT 1,774.00 3.00 5,322.002572.503 CLEAN ROOT CUTTING LIN FT 1,732.00 7.00 12,124.002573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 106.00 190.00 20,140.002573.502 CULVERT END CONTROLS EACH 2.00 200.00 400.002573.503 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS LIN FT 11,461.00 2.50 28,652.50Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 16 -DRAPE 311RAFTTTTTFTFTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFARARARARARARARARARADRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDDDDDDFLLFSQ YFTTTN FTN FTLIN FTLIN FEACHEACHEACHEACHEACHSQ YDCU YDSQ FTSSQ FTLIN FTLIN FTTTTTTTTTFTFTFTFTFTFTFFFFFFFFTTTTTTTT255 1058994(3) 80% COUNTY FEDERAL PROTECT, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), 80% COUNTY FEDERAL RURAL, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS(P) = PLAN QUANTITYITEM SP 1002-124, SP 010-596-014, SP 010-596-016 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (3)2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER LIN FT 600.00 3.00 1,800.002574.505 SUBSOILING (P) ACRE 5.00 350.00 1,750.002574.505 SOIL BED PREPARATION (P) ACRE 8.00 230.00 1,840.002574.508 FERTILIZER TYPE 3POUND 302.00 1.00 302.002574.508 FERTILIZER TYPE 4POUND 68.00 1.50 102.002575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 SQ YD 16,710.00 2.00 33,420.002575.504 ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 10 SQ YD 16,710.00 2.00 33,420.002575.505 SEEDING(P) ACRE 5.00 300.00 1,500.002575.505 DISK ANCHORING (P) ACRE 2.00 100.00 200.002575.505 WEED SPRAYINGACRE 3.00 300.00 900.002575.506 WEED SPRAY MIXTURE GALLON 0.30 100.00 30.002575.509 MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 3 TON 3.00 95.00 285.002575.523 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 3 M GALLON 60.00 550.00 33,000.002575.608 SEED WET DITCHPOUND 11.00 25.00 275.002575.608 SEED SOUTHERN SHORTGRASS ROADSIDE POUND 178.00 4.50 801.002575.608 SEED SOUTHERN TALLGRASS ROADSIDE POUND 44.00 4.50 198.002582.503 6" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 930.00 4.00 3,720.002582.503 6" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN (WR) LIN FT 16,270.00 1.50 24,405.002582.503 10" SOLID LINE PREFORM TAPE GROUND IN LIN FT 600.00 13.00 7,800.002582.503 6" BROKEN LINE PREFORM TAPE GROUND IN LIN FT 2,150.00 7.00 15,050.002582.503 6" DOTTED LINE PREFORM TAPE GROUND IN LIN FT 90.00 7.50 675.00TOTAL 18,988,148.60(3) COUNTY FEDERAL PROTECT FUNDS12,500,000.0080% COUNTY FEDERAL PROTECT 10,000,000.00 (CAPPED)20% STATE GENERAL MATCH 2,500,000.00 (CAPPED)COUNTY FEDERAL RURAL FUNDS 6,353,440.4180% COUNTY FEDERAL RURAL 5,082,752.33 (CAPPED)20% STATE GENERAL MATCH 1,270,688.08 (CAPPED)REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS 134,708.19*THE TOTAL OF AESTHETIC ITEMS FOR THIS PROJECT ARE WITHIN THE PROJECT'S AESTHETIC BUDGET OF $68,000.00 (CAPPED)Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 17 -DPRPRDDDDDDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDR(3)(3)DRAFT)(P)(P)TTTTFTFTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFARARAFLLFPOUFPOUNDFPOUNDFTM GALLONFTTONTFTNDNDUNDUNDSQ YDSQ YDSQ YDSQ YDACREACREACREACREGALLONTTTTTTTTFTFTFTFTFTFTFFFFFFFRARARARARARARADRDRDRDRFTTTTTTTTDRDRDRDRDRDDDD256 1058994(4) 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS(P) = PLAN QUANTITYITEM SP 1008-113, SP 010-596-014 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (4)2011.601 AS BUILTLUMP SUM 0.20 80,000.00 16,000.002016.601 CONTRACT MANAGEMENT LUMP SUM 0.20 300,000.00 60,000.002016.601 QUALITY MANAGEMENT - THERMAL PROFILING LUMP SUM 0.20 30,000.00 6,000.002016.601 QUALITY MANAGEMENT - INTELLIGENT COMPACTION LUMP SUM 0.20 30,000.00 6,000.002021.501 MOBILIZATIONLUMP SUM 0.06 5,000,000.00 300,000.002031.502 FIELD OFFICEEACH 0.06 100,000.00 6,000.002031.502 FIELD LABORATORY EACH 0.06 75,000.00 4,500.002101.502 CLEARINGEACH 38.00 250.00 9,500.002101.502 GRUBBINGEACH 38.00 150.00 5,700.002101.505 CLEARING(P) ACRE 0.90 6,000.00 5,400.002101.505 GRUBBING (P) ACRE 0.90 6,000.00 5,400.002104.502 REMOVE PIPE APRON EACH 15.00 250.00 3,750.002104.502 REMOVE CONCRETE NOSE EACH 3.00 1,000.00 3,000.002104.502 REMOVE GUIDE POST EACH 4.00 50.00 200.002104.502 REMOVE UTILITY VAULT EACH 1.00 650.00 650.002104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 25.00 600.00 15,000.002104.502 REMOVE DELINEATOR/MARKER EACH 4.00 30.00 120.002104.502 REMOVE SIGNEACH 11.00 55.00 605.002104.502 REMOVE ENERGY ABSORBING TERMINAL EACH 4.00 550.00 2,200.002104.502 SALVAGE SIGNEACH 19.00 55.00 1,045.002104.503 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 12.00 6.00 72.002104.503 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 242.00 2.50 605.002104.503 REMOVE PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 234.00 4.00 936.002104.503 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) LIN FT 1,979.00 20.00 39,580.002104.503 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 2,128.00 4.00 8,512.002104.503 REMOVE GUARDRAIL-PLATE BEAM LIN FT 900.00 6.50 5,850.002104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 26,045.00 5.00 130,225.002104.507 REMOVE RIPRAPCU YD 12.00 55.00 660.002104.518 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALK SQ FT 18,945.00 1.00 18,945.002104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 1,981.00 1.50 2,971.502106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON (P) CU YD 47,594.00 9.00 428,346.002106.507 EXCAVATION - CHANNEL AND POND (P) CU YD 23.00 15.00 345.002106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV) (P) CU YD 17,379.00 25.00 434,475.002106.507 COMMON EMBANKMENT (CV) (P) CU YD 5,066.00 8.00 40,528.00Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 18 -DRAH)H)RAFT(P)(P)(P)(P)TFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFARARARARARADRDRDRDRDRAFEEAFTSUSUCHCHEACHEACHEACHEACHEACHEACHACREACREEACHEACHEEACHEACHEACHEACTTTTTTTTTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFAFAFAATTTTTTDDDDDAFTTT257 1058994(4) 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS(P) = PLAN QUANTITYITEM SP 1008-113, SP 010-596-014 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (4)2106.602 CONTROL STAKEEACH 1.00 100.00 100.002106.602 SETTLEMENT PLATES EACH 2.00 700.00 1,400.002118.507 AGGREGATE SURFACING (CV) CLASS 2 CU YD 66.00 80.00 5,280.002123.61 TRACTOR MOUNTED BACKHOE HOUR 20.00 250.00 5,000.002123.61 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 4.00 250.00 1,000.002211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 (P) CU YD 8,512.00 40.00 340,480.002331.603 JOINT ADHESIVELIN FT 34,741.00 0.60 20,844.602360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,C) TON 372.00 115.00 42,780.002360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C) TON 98.00 90.00 8,820.002360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C) TON 83.00 100.00 8,300.002360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (4,B) TON 5,318.00 90.00 478,620.002360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (4,F) TON 7,090.00 110.00 779,900.002451.507 COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE (CV) CU YD 9.00 80.00 720.002451.507 FINE FILTER AGGREGATE (CV) CU YD 3.00 50.00 150.002451.507 FINE AGGREGATE BEDDING (CV) CU YD 55.00 40.00 2,200.002501.502 15" CAS PIPE APRON EACH 2.00 525.00 1,050.002501.502 15" RC PIPE APRON EACH 2.00 1,200.00 2,400.002501.503 15" CAS PIPE CULVERT LIN FT 47.00 80.00 3,760.002502.502 6" PRECAST CONCRETE HEADWALL EACH 1.00 650.00 650.002502.503 4" TP PIPE DRAINLIN FT 285.00 15.00 4,275.002502.503 6" TP PIPE DRAINLIN FT 58.00 30.00 1,740.002502.503 6" PERF TP PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 78.00 25.00 1,950.002502.5034" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 9,339.00 15.00 140,085.002502.602 6" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EACH 1.00 500.00 500.002503.503 12" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V LIN FT 48.00 75.00 3,600.002503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V LIN FT 2,909.00 80.00 232,720.002503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 211.00 85.00 17,935.002503.503 24" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 231.00 100.00 23,100.002503.503 30" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III LIN FT 45.00 150.00 6,750.002503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 3.00 3,000.00 9,000.002506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 60.00 1,200.00 72,000.002506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN G LIN FT 52.00 560.00 29,120.002506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020 LIN FT 212.00 600.00 127,200.002506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 60-4020 LIN FT 13.00 1,000.00 13,000.00Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 19 -DNNDIGN 48IGN 48DESIGN GESIGN GDEWEREWERDR6 CLASS III6 CLADRCLASS IIICLASDRLASS IIILASS IDRSS VSS VDRVDRAFTTTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAARARARARARARARARARADRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDDDAFLLAFEACAFEACHAFCU YDAFTCU YDFTRRYDYDLIN FTLIN FTTONTONTONTONTONTONTONCU YDCTTTTTTTTTTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAADDDDAFTTTTTTTTTTTTTT258 1058994(4) 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS(P) = PLAN QUANTITYITEM SP 1008-113, SP 010-596-014 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (4)2506.602 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 3 EACH 1.00 25,000.00 25,000.002506.603 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 1 LIN FT 14.00 450.00 6,300.002511.504 GEOTEXTILE FILTER TYPE 4 SQ YD 63.00 5.00 315.002511.507 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III CU YD 15.00 135.00 2,025.002521.518 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 19,324.00 6.50 125,606.002521.518 6" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 342.00 10.00 3,420.002521.518 6" CONCRETE WALK-REINFORCED SQ FT 54.00 20.00 1,080.002521.602 DRILL AND GROUT REINF BAR (EPOXY COATED) EACH 79.00 20.00 1,580.002521.618 CONCRETE CURB RAMP WALK SQ FT 1,284.00 16.00 20,544.002531.503 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B424 LIN FT 12,140.00 30.00 364,200.002531.503 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B618 LIN FT 602.00 24.00 14,448.002531.503 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN D424 LIN FT 60.00 33.00 1,980.002531.504 8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQ YD 47.00 120.00 5,640.002531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 135.00 55.00 7,425.002533.503 PORTABLE PRECAST CONCRETE BARRIER DES 8337-ANCHORED LIN FT 150.00 32.00 4,800.002550.502 CABINET FOUNDATION EACH 1.00 2,400.00 2,400.002550.502 OUTDOOR FIBER SPLICE ENCLOSURE EACH 1.00 1,625.00 1,625.002550.502 INSTALL CABINET EACH 1.00 875.00 875.002550.502 SERVICE CABINET EACH 1.00 3,500.00 3,500.002550.503 1.5" NON-METALLIC CONDUIT LIN FT 1,829.00 4.40 8,047.602550.503 2" NON-METALLIC CONDUIT LIN FT 319.00 8.00 2,552.002550.503 POWER CABLE 1 CONDUCTOR NO 2 LIN FT 60.00 6.00 360.002550.601 REMOVE CABLESLUMP SUM 0.10 11,250.00 1,125.002550.601 TEMPORARY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM LUMP SUM 0.10 10,000.00 1,000.002550.601 FIBER OPTIC CABLE TESTING LUMP SUM 0.10 10,000.00 1,000.002550.602 FIBER OPTIC CABLE SPLICING EACH 2.00 1,750.00 3,500.002550.602 BURIED CABLE SIGN EACH 6.00 130.00 780.002550.602 PULL VAULTEACH 3.00 1,600.00 4,800.002550.603 ARMORED FIBER OPTIC PIGTAIL 6SM LIN FT 310.00 1.70 527.002550.603 FIBER OPTIC TRUNK CABLE 36SM LIN FT 2,818.00 2.00 5,636.002554.502 ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLY - TYPE 31 EACH 4.00 4,000.00 16,000.002554.502 END TREATMENT-TANGENT TERMINAL EACH 6.00 3,600.00 21,600.002554.503 TRAFFIC BARRIER DESIGN TYPE 31 LIN FT 2,413.00 35.00 84,455.002554.603 GUIDE POST TYPE SPECIAL EACH 6.00 140.00 840.00Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 20 -DLLDRL 6SML 6SMDRAFTTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFARARARARARADRDRDRDRDRDDAFTFTFTSQ FTSQ FTEACHEACHSQ FTSQ FTLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTSQ YDSQSQ FTLIN FTEACHEACEETTTTTTTTTTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAADDDAFTTTTTTTT259 1058994(4) 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS(P) = PLAN QUANTITYITEM SP 1008-113, SP 010-596-014 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (4)2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 0.06 350,000.00 21,000.002563.601 ALTERNATE PEDESTRIAN ROUTE LUMP SUM 0.20 40,000.00 8,000.002563.602 PORTABLE BARRIER DELINEATOR EACH 6.00 10.00 60.002563.613 PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN EACH 4.00 5,000.00 20,000.002563.615 TEMPORARY IMPACT ATTENUATOR ASSEMBLY 2.00 3,500.00 7,000.002564.602 INSTALL SIGNEACH 19.00 490.00 9,310.002564.602 DELINEATOR/MARKER EACH 6.00 235.00 1,410.002564.602 DELINEATOR/MARKER PANEL EACH 5.00 110.00 550.002564.618 SIGNSQ FT 221.00 85.00 18,785.002565.501 EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION SYSTEM D LUMP SUM 0.50 9,700.00 4,850.002565.516 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM D SYSTEM 0.50 761,800.00 380,900.002572.503 TEMPORARY FENCE LIN FT 1,432.00 3.00 4,296.002572.503 CLEAN ROOT CUTTING LIN FT 1,402.00 7.00 9,814.002573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 40.00 190.00 7,600.002573.503 SILT FENCE, TYPE SD LIN FT 100.00 35.00 3,500.002573.503 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS LIN FT 1,710.00 2.50 4,275.002574.505 SUBSOILING (P) ACRE 3.00 350.00 1,050.002574.505 SOIL BED PREPARATION (P) ACRE 5.00 230.00 1,150.002574.507 FILTER TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD 12.00 60.00 720.002574.508 FERTILIZER TYPE 1 POUND 112.00 1.00 112.002574.508 FERTILIZER TYPE 3 POUND 484.00 1.00 484.002574.508 FERTILIZER TYPE 4 POUND 4.00 1.50 6.002575.504 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 SQ YD 578.00 2.00 1,156.002575.504 ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 10 SQ YD 449.00 2.00 898.002575.504 ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 25 SQ YD 129.00 2.00 258.002575.505 SEEDING(P) ACRE 3.00 300.00 900.002575.505 DISK ANCHORING (P) ACRE 3.00 100.00 300.002575.505 WEED SPRAYINGACRE 2.00 300.00 600.002575.506 WEED SPRAY MIXTURE GALLON 0.20 100.00 20.002575.509 MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 3 TON 5.00 95.00 475.002575.523 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 3 M GALLON 31.00 550.00 17,050.002575.608 SEED SOUTHERN BOULEVARD POUND 69.00 4.50 310.502575.608 SEED RESIDENTIAL TURFGRASS POUND 64.00 25.00 1,600.002575.608 SEED SOUTHERN SHORTGRASS ROADSIDE POUND 103.00 4.50 463.50Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 21 -DRORY 25DRAY 100RAFT(P))(P)(PTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFAAFTMBMBCHCHEACHEACHEACHEACHSQ FTSQ FTLUMP SUMSUMSYSTEMLIN FTLIN FTLEACHLIN FTLIN FTACRAATTTTTTTTTTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAARARARARARADRDRDRDRDRDDDDDAFTTTTTTTT260 1058994(4) 80% COUNTY FEDERAL STP, 20% STATE GENERAL (CAPPED), REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS(P) = PLAN QUANTITYITEM SP 1008-113, SP 010-596-014 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (4)2575.608 SEED SOUTHERN TALLGRASS ROADSIDE POUND 14.00 4.50 63.002582.503 4" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 960.00 2.00 1,920.002582.503 24" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 40.00 22.00 880.002582.503 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT LIN FT 180.00 1.75 315.002582.503 6" SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN (WR) LIN FT 13,390.00 1.50 20,085.002582.503 6" DOUBLE SOLID LINE MULTI-COMPONENT GROUND IN (WR) LIN FT 2,680.00 2.00 5,360.002582.503 6" SOLID LINE PREFORM TAPE GROUND IN LIN FT 4,000.00 8.50 34,000.002582.503 10" SOLID LINE PREFORM TAPE GROUND IN LIN FT 750.00 13.00 9,750.002582.503 6" BROKEN LINE PREFORM TAPE GROUND IN LIN FT 780.00 7.00 5,460.002582.503 6" DOTTED LINE PREFORM TAPE GROUND IN LIN FT 160.00 7.50 1,200.002582.503 10" DOTTED LINE PREFORM TAPE GROUND IN LIN FT 240.00 14.00 3,360.002582.503 24" SOLID LINE PREFORM THERMO GROUND IN LIN FT 610.00 28.00 17,080.002582.518 PAVEMENT MESSAGE PREFORM THERMOPLASTIC GROUND IN SQ FT 363.00 28.00 10,164.002582.518 CROSSWALK PREFORM THERMOPLASTIC GROUND IN SQ FT 300.00 15.50 4,650.00TOTAL 5,337,725.70(4) COUNTY FEDERAL PROTECT FUNDS 5,337,725.7080% COUNTY FEDERAL STP 4,270,180.56 (CAPPED)20% STATE GENERAL MATCH 1,067,545.14 (CAPPED)REMAINDER 100% COUNTY FUNDS 0.00Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 22 -DRARARARAREMAINDER RARARARADRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDDDDDDDRARA20% STATE GERARA% COUNTY FEAFTAFTY FEDERAL PROTECT TTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTAFAFTTTN FTN FTLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTLIN FTSQ FTSQSQ FTTTTTTTTTTTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFTTTTTTTTTTTTTTARARA261 1058994(5) 50% STATE, 50% COUNTY FUNDSITEM SP 1002-124 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COSTNUMBER WORK ITEM (5)TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM A, TH 5 AT PARK DRIVE/KOCHIA LANE, SIGNAL SYSTEM ID 22474821ATC CABINET 350EACH 1.00 58,841.46 58,841.46GRIDSMART VIDEO DETECTION SYSTEM (INCLUDES 1 CAMERA) EACH 1.00 25,354.12 25,354.12ADDITIONAL GRIDSMART CAMERA EACH 1.00 6,539.50 6,539.50PTZ CAMERAEACH 1.00 5,207.36 5,207.36SUBTOTAL 95,942.44TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM B, TH 5 AT CSAH 13, SIGNAL SYSTEM ID 22474822ATC CABINET 350EACH 1.00 58,841.46 58,841.46GRIDSMART VIDEO DETECTION SYSTEM (INCLUDES 1 CAMERA) EACH 1.00 25,354.12 25,354.12ADDITIONAL GRIDSMART CAMERA EACH 1.00 6,539.50 6,539.50PTZ CAMERAEACH 1.00 5,207.36 5,207.36SUBTOTAL 95,942.44TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM C, TH 5 AT MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY, SIGNAL SYSTEM ID 22474823ATC CABINET 350EACH 1.00 58,841.46 58,841.46GRIDSMART VIDEO DETECTION SYSTEM (INCLUDES 1 CAMERA) EACH 1.00 25,354.12 25,354.12ADDITIONAL GRIDSMART CAMERA EACH 1.00 6,539.50 6,539.50PTZ CAMERAEACH 1.00 5,207.36 5,207.36SUBTOTAL 95,942.44TOTAL FOR STATE FURNISHED MATERIALS 287,827.32(5) 50% STATE 143,913.6650% COUNTY 143,913.66STATE CREDIT FOR STATE FURNISHED MATERIALS 287,827.32*** LUMP SUM AMOUNT ***Data is considered Non-public prior to project award under theMinnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13.- 23 -DRRDRR50%DRR(5)(5)5DRAFTCHCHEACHEACHEACHEACHEAY, SIGNAL SYSTEM ID 2247Y, SIGNAL SYSTEM ID 2EECAMERA)TTTTTTTTTTTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFTAFAFAAARARARARATTTTTTRADRDRTDRDRDRAFDDDDD262 Q 263 Q 264 Q 265 Q 266 LIGHTING UNIT TYPE 9-40 LIGHT FOUND ATION D E S. E -� LIGHTING UNIT !BY OTHERS> •"T' LIGHT FOUND A TION !BY OTH E RS> W ALLP ACK ■HANDHOLE NOTE S: LEGEND -•--•-- @ ...L !. LIGHTING WORK SH ALL BE COORDIN ATED B E TWEEN THE GENER AL �e�t��Yt 0�t1[1TY E e56���$Aiss w�aS1���c r?�t1��2Tl�1. 2.LIGHTING UNIT CBY OTHE RS> LOCATIONS AR E APPROXIM ATE AND SH ALL B E VE RIFIE D IN TH E FI E LD. I I I I DIRE CT BURIE D LIGHTING CABLE 4 CONDUCTOR NO. 4 2" NON-METALLIC CONDUIT !UNLE SS NOTE D OTH E RWISE > SERVICE CABINET LIGHTING UNIT NUMBER PERM ANENT GROUND ROD125 OHMS OR LE SS> \ A/L COMMERCIAL AVES 00 .--� t�>r 1'$ DIRECT BURIED LIGHT CABLE IN CONDUIT• 3" NMC 4 I I I I I H 7 0 / / / 01 I I I I I 3" NMC 1·4/C•4 A/L TH 5 -COMMERCIAL AVE ROUNDABOUT l_-----� --------� I I I I -____ J L ____ _ Default 0 50 �---SCALE 100 FEET � Iii\ BOLTON \[V&MENK 12224 NICOLLET AVENUE BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA SS337 Phone: (952) 890-0509 Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com DIRECT BURIED LIGHTING CONDUIT• A/L TH 5 EB (RAB) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED l===�-*--===I PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ENGINEER SIGNATURE 5 Michael S. Larson >---+--+-----I UC. NO. 58850 DATE #SIGNDATEXXX ---------- -------- -�---/-6IRECT BURIED LIGHTINGCABLE IN CONDUIT• / 3" NMC ./ / I oor !·4/C•4 IA\ LIGHT SYST E M A \!:Y FEED POINT !OHi SERVICE CABINET -TYPE LI 120/240 VOLT EQUIPMENT PAD 2" NMC TO SOP 3-I /C•2® SOURCE OF POWER: GROUND MOUNTE D TRANSOFRM E R CMVE C> 2" NMC TO SOP WITH:3-I/C•2 S.P. 1002-124 (THS), S.P. 1008-113 (TH41), S.P. 010-S96-019, S.P. 010-S96-014, AOA S.P. 010-596-016, S.P. 010-596-020, S.A.P. 010-613-009, S.A.P. 241-020-003, S.P. 241-090-001 DRAWN AOA CHECKED MSL TH 5 RECONSTRUCTION LIGHTING PLANS SHEET 746 OF 768 267 SHEET alexma1:23:19 PM4/25/2025pdf-B and W.pltcfg0T4M00197_pen.tblFEETSCALE 500 100 OF DATEBYREV. 12224 NICOLLET AVENUE BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 Phone: (952) 890-0509 Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.comR DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED DATELIC. NO.Default S.P. 010-596-016, S.P. 010-613-009, S.P. 241-020-003, S.P. 241-090-001 S.P. 1002-124, S.P. 1008-113, S.P. 010-596-014, A/L 78TH ST OVERPASS 729 708 LIGHTING PLANS TH 5 RECONSTRUCTION MSL ABM ABM 03/14/202558850 Michael S. Larson SEE BRIDGE PLANS FOR BRIDGE LIGHTING DETAILS.3. AND SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD. LIGHTING UNIT (BY OTHERS) LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE2. ELECTRIC UTILITY COMPANY AS REQUIRED (INCIDENTAL). CONTRACTOR, THE ELECTRICAL SUBCONTRACTOR, AND THE LIGHTING WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED BETWEEN THE GENERAL1. NOTES: 1-1/C#10 INS. GR. 4-1/C#10 HT 1-1/C#10 INS. GR. 2-1/C#10 3-1/C#2 2" NMC TO SOP 120/240 VOLT SERVICE CABINET - TYPE B FEED POINT H LIGHT SYSTEM H 3-1/C#2 2" NMC FROM SOP WITH: (XCEL ENERGY) GROUND MOUNTED TRANSFORMER SOURCE OF POWER: H T VICTORIA, MN 1338 STIEGER LAKE LANE METER ADDRESS: XCEL ENERGY SOURCE OF POWER T H1 12 H 3H 4 H 1 H 2 TH 5 WB� TH 5 EB� STIEGER LAKE LN� 78TH ST� NARCISSUS CT CIRCLEMARIGOLD BRIDGE # 10064 MATCHLINE STA 701+50MATCHLINE STA 716+00LEGEND PERMANENT GROUND ROD (25 OHMS OR LESS) Y XX =LIGHTING UNIT NUMBER 4 CONDUCTOR NO. 4 DIRECT BURIED LIGHTING CABLE (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) 2" NON-METALLIC CONDUIT SERVICE CABINET LIGHT FOUNDATION DES. E LIGHTING UNIT TYPE 9-40 WALLPACK HANDHOLE LIGHT FOUNDATION (BY OTHERS) LIGHTING UNIT (BY OTHERS) HH 6 HH 5 2025705 710 715 705 710 715 3001015 200 290 268 SHEET tombu12:50:33 PM12/18/2024pdf-B and W.pltcfg0T4M00197_pen.tblOF DATEBYREV. 12224 NICOLLET AVENUE BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 Phone: (952) 890-0509 Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.comR DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED DATELIC. NO. S.P. 010-596-016, S.P. 010-596-020, S.A.P. 010-613-009, S.A.P. 241-020-003, S.P. 241-090-001 S.P. 1002-124 (TH5), S.P. 1008-113 (TH41), S.P. 010-596-019, S.P. 010-596-014, Default FEETSCALE 150 30 ENGINEER SIGNATURE 5 (TYPICAL) 1-1/C#10 INS. GR. 2-1/C#10 BETWEEN WALLPACKS SURFACE MOUNTED 1" RSC BN 3-1/C#2 2" NMC TO SOP EQUIPMENT PAD B 120/240 VOLT SERVICE CABINET - TYPE B FEED POINT B LIGHT SYSTEM B 3-1/C#2 2" NMC FROM SOP WITH: (XCEL ENERGY) GROUND MOUNTED TRANSFORMER SOURCE OF POWER: B N 768 748 LIGHTING PLANS TH 5 RECONSTRUCTION MSL AOA AOA #SIGNDATEXXX58850 Michael S. Larson SEE BRIDGE PLANS FOR UNDERPASS LIGHTING DETAILS.3. AND SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD. LIGHTING UNIT (BY OTHERS) LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE2. ELECTRIC UTILITY COMPANY AS REQUIRED (INCIDENTAL). CONTRACTOR, THE ELECTRICAL SUBCONTRACTOR, AND THE LIGHTING WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED BETWEEN THE GENERAL1. NOTES: B 2 B 3 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 B 1 HH1 LEGEND PERMANENT GROUND ROD (25 OHMS OR LESS) Y XX =LIGHTING UNIT NUMBER 4 CONDUCTOR NO. 4 DIRECT BURIED LIGHTING CABLE (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) 2" NON-METALLIC CONDUIT SERVICE CABINET LIGHT FOUNDATION DES. E LIGHTING UNIT TYPE 9-40 WALLPACK HANDHOLE LIGHT FOUNDATION (BY OTHERS) LIGHTING UNIT (BY OTHERS) BRIDGE # 10X27 3 5 40 750 750 269 SHEET tombu12:50:33 PM12/18/2024pdf-B and W.pltcfg0T4M00197_pen.tblOF DATEBYREV. 12224 NICOLLET AVENUE BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 Phone: (952) 890-0509 Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.comR DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED DATELIC. NO. S.P. 010-596-016, S.P. 010-596-020, S.A.P. 010-613-009, S.A.P. 241-020-003, S.P. 241-090-001 S.P. 1002-124 (TH5), S.P. 1008-113 (TH41), S.P. 010-596-019, S.P. 010-596-014, Default FEETSCALE 150 30 ENGINEER SIGNATURE 5 T SEE BRIDGE PLANS FOR UNDERPASS LIGHTING DETAILS.3. AND SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD. LIGHTING UNIT (BY OTHERS) LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE2. ELECTRIC UTILITY COMPANY AS REQUIRED (INCIDENTAL). CONTRACTOR, THE ELECTRICAL SUBCONTRACTOR, AND THE LIGHTING WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED BETWEEN THE GENERAL1. NOTES: 3-1/C#2 2" NMC TO SOP EQUIPMENT PAD C 120/240 VOLT SERVICE CABINET - TYPE B FEED POINT C LIGHT SYSTEM C 3-1/C#2 2" NMC FROM SOP WITH: (XCEL ENERGY) POLE MOUNTED TRANSFORMER SOURCE OF POWER: C O C O (TYPICAL) 1-1/C#10 INS. GR. 2-1/C#10 BETWEEN WALLPACKS SURFACE MOUNTED 1" RSC 768 749 LIGHTING PLANS TH 5 RECONSTRUCTION MSL AOA AOA #SIGNDATEXXX58850 Michael S. Larson SYSTEM. FUTURE FOR (EMPTY) 1.5" NMC SYSTEM. FUTURE FOR (EMPTY) 1.5" NMC C 1 C 3 C 4 C 5 C 6 C 7 C 2 HH2 LEGEND PERMANENT GROUND ROD (25 OHMS OR LESS) Y XX =LIGHTING UNIT NUMBER 4 CONDUCTOR NO. 4 DIRECT BURIED LIGHTING CABLE (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) 2" NON-METALLIC CONDUIT SERVICE CABINET LIGHT FOUNDATION DES. E LIGHTING UNIT TYPE 9-40 WALLPACK HANDHOLE LIGHT FOUNDATION (BY OTHERS) LIGHTING UNIT (BY OTHERS) HH N HH S BRIDGE # 10X29 785 785 270 SHEET tombu12:50:34 PM12/18/2024pdf-B and W.pltcfg0T4M00197_pen.tblFEETSCALE 500 100 OF DATEBYREV. 12224 NICOLLET AVENUE BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 Phone: (952) 890-0509 Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.comR DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED DATELIC. NO. S.P. 010-596-016, S.P. 010-596-020, S.A.P. 010-613-009, S.A.P. 241-020-003, S.P. 241-090-001 S.P. 1002-124 (TH5), S.P. 1008-113 (TH41), S.P. 010-596-019, S.P. 010-596-014, Default ENGINEER SIGNATURE 5 768 750 LIGHTING PLANS TH 5 RECONSTRUCTION MSL AOA AOA #SIGNDATEXXX58850 Michael S. Larson AND SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD. LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE(BY OTHERS)LIGHTING UNIT 2. ELECTRIC UTILITY COMPANY AS REQUIRED (INCIDENTAL). CONTRACTOR, THE ELECTRICAL SUBCONTRACTOR, AND THE LIGHTING WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED BETWEEN THE GENERAL1. NOTES: 3-1/C#2 2" NMC TO SOP EQUIPMENT PAD 120/240 VOLT SERVICE CABINET - TYPE RLF FEED POINT 10H2 LIGHT SYSTEM D 3-1/C#2 2" NMC FROM SOP WITH: (MVEC) GROUND MOUNTED TRANSFORMER SOURCE OF POWER: D X D O H2 1 MATCHLINE STA 835+50MATCHLINE STA 821+50LEGEND PERMANENT GROUND ROD (25 OHMS OR LESS) Y XX =LIGHTING UNIT NUMBER 4 CONDUCTOR NO. 4 DIRECT BURIED LIGHTING CABLE (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) 2" NON-METALLIC CONDUIT SERVICE CABINET LIGHT FOUNDATION DES. E LIGHTING UNIT TYPE 9-40 WALLPACK HANDHOLE LIGHT FOUNDATION (BY OTHERS) LIGHTING UNIT (BY OTHERS) TH 5 WB� TH 5 EB� A/L ARBORETUM DR 830 825 830 835825830 835 271 ? ?? ? SHEET tombu12:50:34 PM12/18/2024pdf-B and W.pltcfg0T4M00197_pen.tblFEETSCALE 500 100 OF DATEBYREV. 12224 NICOLLET AVENUE BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 Phone: (952) 890-0509 Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.comR DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED DATELIC. NO. S.P. 010-596-016, S.P. 010-596-020, S.A.P. 010-613-009, S.A.P. 241-020-003, S.P. 241-090-001 S.P. 1002-124 (TH5), S.P. 1008-113 (TH41), S.P. 010-596-019, S.P. 010-596-014, Default ENGINEER SIGNATURE 5 768 751 LIGHTING PLANS TH 5 RECONSTRUCTION MSL AOA AOA #SIGNDATEXXX58850 Michael S. Larson AND SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD. LIGHTING UNIT (BY OTHERS) LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE2. ELECTRIC UTILITY COMPANY AS REQUIRED (INCIDENTAL). CONTRACTOR, THE ELECTRICAL SUBCONTRACTOR, AND THE LIGHTING WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED BETWEEN THE GENERAL1. NOTES: H2 2 H2 3 MATCHLINE STA 849+00MATCHLINE STA 835+50LEGEND PERMANENT GROUND ROD (25 OHMS OR LESS) Y XX =LIGHTING UNIT NUMBER 4 CONDUCTOR NO. 4 DIRECT BURIED LIGHTING CABLE (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) 2" NON-METALLIC CONDUIT SERVICE CABINET LIGHT FOUNDATION DES. E LIGHTING UNIT TYPE 9-40 WALLPACK HANDHOLE LIGHT FOUNDATION (BY OTHERS) LIGHTING UNIT (BY OTHERS) TH 5 EB� TH 5 WB� 840 845 840 845 272 SHEET tombu12:50:35 PM12/18/2024pdf-B and W.pltcfg0T4M00197_pen.tblOF DATEBYREV. 12224 NICOLLET AVENUE BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 Phone: (952) 890-0509 Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.comR DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED DATELIC. NO. S.P. 010-596-016, S.P. 010-596-020, S.A.P. 010-613-009, S.A.P. 241-020-003, S.P. 241-090-001 S.P. 1002-124 (TH5), S.P. 1008-113 (TH41), S.P. 010-596-019, S.P. 010-596-014, Default FEETSCALE 150 30 ENGINEER SIGNATURE 5 T SEE BRIDE PLANS FOR UNDERPASS LIGHTING DETAILS.3. AND SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD. LIGHTING UNIT (BY OTHERS) LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE2. ELECTRIC UTILITY COMPANY AS REQUIRED (INCIDENTAL). CONTRACTOR, THE ELECTRICAL SUBCONTRACTOR, AND THE LIGHTING WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED BETWEEN THE GENERAL1. NOTES: E Q 3-1/C#2 2" NMC TO SOP EQUIPMENT PAD 120/240 VOLT SERVICE CABINET - TYPE B FEED POINT E LIGHT SYSTEM E 3-1/C#2 2" NMC FROM SOP WITH: (XCEL ENERGY) POLE MOUNTED TRANSFORMER SOURCE OF POWER: E Q 768 752 LIGHTING PLANS TH 5 RECONSTRUCTION MSL AOA AOA #SIGNDATEXXX58850 Michael S. Larson (TYPICAL) 1-1/C#10 INS. GR. 2-1/C#10 BETWEEN WALLPACKS SURFACE MOUNTED 1" RSC E 1 E 2 E 3 E 4 E 5 E 6 HH3 LEGEND PERMANENT GROUND ROD (25 OHMS OR LESS) Y XX =LIGHTING UNIT NUMBER 4 CONDUCTOR NO. 4 DIRECT BURIED LIGHTING CABLE (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) 2" NON-METALLIC CONDUIT SERVICE CABINET LIGHT FOUNDATION DES. E LIGHTING UNIT TYPE 9-40 WALLPACK HANDHOLE LIGHT FOUNDATION (BY OTHERS) LIGHTING UNIT (BY OTHERS) TH 5 WB� TH 5 EB� 125 855 855 273 SHEET tombu12:50:35 PM12/18/2024pdf-B and W.pltcfg0T4M00197_pen.tblOF DATEBYREV. 12224 NICOLLET AVENUE BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 Phone: (952) 890-0509 Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.comR DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED DATELIC. NO. S.P. 010-596-016, S.P. 010-596-020, S.A.P. 010-613-009, S.A.P. 241-020-003, S.P. 241-090-001 S.P. 1002-124 (TH5), S.P. 1008-113 (TH41), S.P. 010-596-019, S.P. 010-596-014, Default FEETSCALE 150 30 ENGINEER SIGNATURE 5 T SEE BRIDGE PLANS FOR UNDERPASS LIGHTING DETAILS.3. AND SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD. LIGHTING UNIT (BY OTHERS) LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE2. ELECTRIC UTILITY COMPANY AS REQUIRED (INCIDENTAL). CONTRACTOR, THE ELECTRICAL SUBCONTRACTOR, AND THE LIGHTING WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED BETWEEN THE GENERAL1. NOTES: 3-1/C#2 2" NMC TO SOP EQUIPMENT PAD 120/240 VOLT SERVICE CABINET - TYPE B FEED POINT F LIGHT SYSTEM F 3-1/C#2 2" NMC FROM SOP WITH: (XCEL ENERGY) POLE MOUNTED TRANSFORMER SOURCE OF POWER: F X XF 768 753 LIGHTING PLANS TH 5 RECONSTRUCTION MSL AOA AOA #SIGNDATEXXX58850 Michael S. Larson (TYPICAL) 1-1/C#10 INS. GR. 2-1/C#10 BETWEEN WALLPACKS SURFACE MOUNTED 1" RSC F 1 F 2 F 3 F 4 F 5 F 6 F 7 F 8 LEGEND PERMANENT GROUND ROD (25 OHMS OR LESS) Y XX =LIGHTING UNIT NUMBER 4 CONDUCTOR NO. 4 DIRECT BURIED LIGHTING CABLE (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) 2" NON-METALLIC CONDUIT SERVICE CABINET LIGHT FOUNDATION DES. E LIGHTING UNIT TYPE 9-40 WALLPACK HANDHOLE LIGHT FOUNDATION (BY OTHERS) LIGHTING UNIT (BY OTHERS) HH4 TH 5 WB� TH 5 EB� 25 870 870 274 AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FTAREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FTPERIMETER 30 FTREM 35 SFAREA 15 SFAREA 2 6 S Q F T PERIME TE R 5 0 FT REM 95 S Q F T AR EA 2 6 S Q F T PE R IME T E R 5 0 F T REM 9 5 SQ FT AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FTAREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT695+00696+00697+0 0 698+00695+00696+00 697+00698+00(180) SS2 (3) AL (184) SS2 (37) RG (41) RG AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FTAREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FT699+00699+00SHEET11:25 AM9/30/24----$PENTBLS$OF DATEBYREV. R DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATELIC. NO. H:\CACO\0T4M00197\CAD\C3D\M00197_L100.dwg S.P. 1002-124, S.P. 1008-113, S.P. 010-596-019, S.P. 010-596-014, S.P. 010-596-016, S.P. 010-596-020, S.P. 010-613-009, S.A.P. 241-020-003, S.P. 241-090-001111 WASHINGTON AVE S MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 Phone: (612) 416-0220 Email: Minneapolis@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com SUITE 650 JOSHUA SHIELDS 50275 02/27/2025 BE/SP BE/SP JS TH 5 RECONSTRUCTION LS24 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS 1 TH 5 / COMMERCIAL AVE ROUNDABOUT ENLARGEMENT SITE LEGEND 4" COLORED CONC. WALK STONE PAVERS (SCREE) SEE LS16 FOR DETAILS PLANTING BED SEE LS15 FOR DETAILS 6" COLORED CONC. WALK DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SEE LS15 FOR DETAILS DECIDUOUS/ORNAMENTAL TREE SEE MNDOT STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS, STANDARD PLAN 5-297.301 SMALL LANDSCAPE BOULDER SEE LS16 FOR DETAILS BENCH/WASTE RECEPTACLE AREA SEE LS15 FOR DETAILS 7" COLORED CONC. WALK LARGE LANDSCAPE BOULDER SEE LS16 FOR DETAILS CLASS II RANDOM RIPRAP SEE LS16 FOR DETAILS FEETSCALE 150 30 R LS04 CO M M E R C I A L A V E (EAS T B O U N D ) COM M E R C I A L A V E (WE S T B O U N D )TH 5 (WESTBOUND)TH 5 (EASTBOUND)TH 5 (EASTBOUND)TH 5 ( W E S T B O U N D) LANDSCAPE PLANTING & LAYOUT PLAN 1 2 TH 5 / COMMERCIAL AVE ROUNDABOUT ENLARGEMENT (NORTH) R TH 5 (WESTBOUND)MATCH LINE - SEE 1/LS04 MATCH LINE - SEE 2/LS04 275 AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FTAREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FTPERIMETER 30 FTREM 35 SFAREA 15 SFAREA 26 S Q F T PERIM ET E R 5 0 F T REM 9 5 S Q F T ARE A 26 SQ F T PER IM E T E R 5 0 FT REM 9 5 S Q F T AREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FTAREA 26 SQ FTPERIMETER 50FTREM 95 SQ FTM 1" SP RS A A A A A A F F F F F F O O OO O O C SP 1" 1" 1" 1" 1" 1" 1" 2" 1"2" 2" 1 9.891" 1 2 7.171" 2 3 10.11" 3 4 8.11" 4 5 7.351"5 6 9.811" 6 SHEET11:25 AM9/30/24----$PENTBLS$OF DATEBYREV. R DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATELIC. NO. H:\CACO\0T4M00197\CAD\C3D\M00197_L300.dwg 111 WASHINGTON AVE S MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 Phone: (612) 416-0220 Email: Minneapolis@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com SUITE 650 JOSHUA SHIELDS 50275 02/27/2025 RK RK JS TH 5 RECONSTRUCTION LS24 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS S.P. 1002-124, S.P. 1008-113, S.P. 010-596-019, S.P. 010-596-014, S.P. 010-596-016, S.P. 010-596-020, S.P. 010-613-009, S.A.P. 241-020-003, S.P. 241-090-001 1 TH 5 / COMMERCIAL AVE ROUNDABOUT ENLARGEMENT FEETSCALE 150 30 R LS18 DRIP IRRIGATION VALVE KIT DRIP ZONE OPERATION INDICATOR DRIP ZONE AIR RELIEF VALVE DRIP ZONE FLUSH VALVE AREA TO RECEIVE DRIPLINE (HATCH DIRECTION VARIES FOR DISTINCTION) QUICK COUPLER VALVE ISOLATION VALVE BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER SURGE PROTECTION RAIN SENSOR WATER METER IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE IRRIGATION MAINLINE PIPE SLEEVE C SP RS M IRRIGATION LEGEND A F O CO M M E R C I A L A V E (EAS T B O U N D ) CO M M E R C I A L A V E (WE S T B O U N D )TH 5 (WESTBOUND)TH 5 (EASTBOUND)TH 5 (EASTBOUND)TH 5 ( W E S T B O U N D) IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLAN 1 276 713+00 714+00 715+00 716+00 717+00 713+00 714+00 715+00 716+00 717+00 (3) QM (1) CS (1) CS (4) BR (3) AG (4) CC SHEET11:25 AM9/30/24----$PENTBLS$OF DATEBYREV. R DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATELIC. NO. H:\CACO\0T4M00197\CAD\C3D\M00197_L100.dwg S.P. 1002-124, S.P. 1008-113, S.P. 010-596-019, S.P. 010-596-014, S.P. 010-596-016, S.P. 010-596-020, S.P. 010-613-009, S.A.P. 241-020-003, S.P. 241-090-001111 WASHINGTON AVE S MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 Phone: (612) 416-0220 Email: Minneapolis@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com SUITE 650 JOSHUA SHIELDS 50275 02/27/2025 BE/SP BE/SP JS TH 5 RECONSTRUCTION LS24 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS R 1 78TH STREET PEDESTRIAN OVERPASS ENLARGEMENT FEETSCALE 250 50 LS05 SITE LEGEND 4" COLORED CONC. WALK STONE PAVERS (SCREE) SEE LS16 FOR DETAILS PLANTING BED SEE LS15 FOR DETAILS 6" COLORED CONC. WALK DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SEE LS15 FOR DETAILS DECIDUOUS/ORNAMENTAL TREE SEE MNDOT STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS, STANDARD PLAN 5-297.301 SMALL LANDSCAPE BOULDER SEE LS16 FOR DETAILS BENCH/WASTE RECEPTACLE AREA SEE LS15 FOR DETAILS 7" COLORED CONC. WALK LARGE LANDSCAPE BOULDER SEE LS16 FOR DETAILS CLASS II RANDOM RIPRAP SEE LS16 FOR DETAILS TH 5 (WESTBOUND) TH 5 (EASTBOUND) LAKE MI N N E T O N K A L R T R E G I O N A L T R A I L 78TH S T LANDSCAPE PLANTING & LAYOUT PLAN 2 277 747+00 748+00 749+00 750+00 751+00 746+00 747+00 748+00 749+00 750+00 751+00 33+00 34 + 0 0 35+003 6 + 0 0 37+ 0 0 38+003 (3) CC (1) AG(1) AG (1) BR (1) BR (1) BR (66) PN (355) PN AREA = 15 S Q ' REM = 4 8 SQ ' PERI M ET ER = 30 ' ARE A = 1 5 SQ 'REM = 48 SQ ' PERIM ET ER = 3 0 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 ' AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 '513+00514+00515+00758+00 759+00 757+00 758+00 759+00 SHEET11:25 AM9/30/24----$PENTBLS$OF DATEBYREV. R DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATELIC. NO. H:\CACO\0T4M00197\CAD\C3D\M00197_L100.dwg S.P. 1002-124, S.P. 1008-113, S.P. 010-596-019, S.P. 010-596-014, S.P. 010-596-016, S.P. 010-596-020, S.P. 010-613-009, S.A.P. 241-020-003, S.P. 241-090-001111 WASHINGTON AVE S MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 Phone: (612) 416-0220 Email: Minneapolis@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com SUITE 650 JOSHUA SHIELDS 50275 02/27/2025 BE/SP BE/SP JS TH 5 RECONSTRUCTION LS24 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS 1 MADELYN CREEK PARK UNDERPASS AREA SITE LEGEND 4" COLORED CONC. WALK STONE PAVERS (SCREE) SEE LS16 FOR DETAILS PLANTING BED SEE LS15 FOR DETAILS 6" COLORED CONC. WALK DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SEE LS15 FOR DETAILS DECIDUOUS/ORNAMENTAL TREE SEE MNDOT STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS, STANDARD PLAN 5-297.301 SMALL LANDSCAPE BOULDER SEE LS16 FOR DETAILS BENCH/WASTE RECEPTACLE AREA SEE LS15 FOR DETAILS 7" COLORED CONC. WALK LARGE LANDSCAPE BOULDER SEE LS16 FOR DETAILS CLASS II RANDOM RIPRAP SEE LS16 FOR DETAILS FEETSCALE 250 50 R LS06 TH 5 (WESTBOUND) TH 5 (EASTBOUND) LANDSCAPE PLANTING & LAYOUT PLAN 3 2 TH 5 / CSAH 13 INTERSECTION R TH 5 (WESTBOUND) TH 5 (EASTBOUND)BAVARIA RD / CSAH 13(NORTHBOUND)BAVARIA RD / CSAH 13(SOUTHBOUND)278 SHEET tombu1:14:54 PM4/25/2025pdf-B and W.pltcfg0T4M00197_pen.tblOF DATEBYREV. 12224 NICOLLET AVENUE BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 Phone: (952) 890-0509 Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.comR DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED DATELIC. NO.H:\CACO\0T4M00197\CAD\ORD\CACO-0T4M00197\plans\Misc\cd1002124_105gel001.dgnDefault FEETSCALE 1500 300 S.P. 010-596-016, S.P. 010-613-009, S.P. 241-020-003, S.P. 241-090-001 S.P. 1002-124, S.P. 1008-113, S.P. 010-596-014,??????FF=974.66 FF=973.36 F ? ? 729 3 GENERAL LAYOUT TH 5 RECONSTRUCTION DMK TWB BAU 03/14/202559444 BENJAMIN A. ULRICH � TH 5 WB � TH 5 EB A/L TH5 - COMMERCIAL AVE ROUNDABOUT A/L COMMERCIAL AVE NB A/L COMMERCIAL AVE SB � STIEGER LAKE LN LRT REGIONAL TRAIL A/L LAKE MINNETONKA 80TH ST COMMERCIAL AVE QUAMOCLIT ST� 80TH ST CARVER COUNTY CITY OF VICTORIA WALL A PMB RETAINING FLASHER SYSTEM A PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK FLASHER SYSTEM B PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK TH 5 WB STA 7 0 1 + 0 0.0 0TH 5 WB (RAB) STA 7 0 0 + 3 5.8 9 =EQUATI ON:TH 5 EB STA 7 0 1 + 0 0.0 0TH 5 EB (RAB) STA 7 0 0 + 6 4.0 0 =EQUATI ON: ADT (2045) = 23,600 ADT (2023) = 14,750 ADT (2045) = 23,600ADT (2023) = 14,750ENKI STORMWATER POND MATCHLI NE STA 7 1 0 + 5 0 A/L TH 5 EB (RAB) A/L TH 5 WB (RAB) BEGIN S.P. 010-596-014 BEGIN S.P. 1002-124 STA 685+35.00 TH 5 EB (RAB) LAYOUT LEGEND INPLACE ROADWAY PROPOSED ROADWAY AREAS OF ENVIORNMENTAL SENSITIVITY SIGNAL SYSTEM A 685 690 695 700100105201 01011685 690 6 9 5 700705710705710200 10 290291 B PLAN SHEET LAYOUT B SIGNING & STRIPING PLANS EROSION CONTROL & TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS DRAINAGE PLANS CONSTRUCTION PLANS REMOVAL PLANS INPLACE TOPOGRAPHY PLANS EXISTING UTILITY PLANS GENERAL SHEET LAYOUT IDENTIFIER A 6766 158157 182181 206205 625/626 627 537 538 430 431 279 ?????? ? ? ?? AC AC MBMB MB ? ? ? ? ? ? 11260979.59EOCN B 11261979.54EOCN 11262979.64EOCN11263979.63EOCN CLS STEIGER LAKE 3 0 0 40040520 25 30 301715720725 730 735 740 715720 725 730 735 740 1520 25 30 35 40 45 50 30291SHEET tombu1:14:55 PM4/25/2025pdf-B and W.pltcfg0T4M00197_pen.tblOF DATEBYREV. 12224 NICOLLET AVENUE BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 Phone: (952) 890-0509 Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.comR DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED DATELIC. NO.H:\CACO\0T4M00197\CAD\ORD\CACO-0T4M00197\plans\Misc\cd1002124_105gel002.dgnDefault FEETSCALE 1500 300 S.P. 010-596-016, S.P. 010-613-009, S.P. 241-020-003, S.P. 241-090-001 S.P. 1002-124, S.P. 1008-113, S.P. 010-596-014, 729 4 GENERAL LAYOUT TH 5 RECONSTRUCTION DMK TWB BAU 03/14/202559444 BENJAMIN A. ULRICH LRT REGIONAL TRAIL A/L LAKE MINNETONKA CARVER COUNTY CITY OF VICTORIA SIGNAL SYSTEM A WALL B (NORTH) CIP RETAINING WALL A (NORTH) CIP RETAINING ADT (2045) = 1,340ADT (2023) = 303ADT (2045) = 23,600 ADT (2023) = 14,750 WALL B (SOUTH) CIP RETAINING WALL A (SOUTH) CIP RETAINING NOISE WALL A MATCHLI NE STA 7 0 1 +5 0 MATCHLINE STA 743+50� TH 5 WB � TH 5 EB � 78TH ST � KOCHIA LN/PARK DR � KOCHIA LN/PARK DRPARK DRKOCHIA LNOVERPASS A/L 78TH ST STA 20+14.09 BEGIN S.P. 010-596-014 BEGIN S.P. 241-090-001 78TH ST OVERPASS - TRAIL NO. 10065 BRIDGE END S.P. 010-596-014 END S.P. 241-090-001 STA 30+00.12 78TH ST OVERPASS - TRAIL (STIEGER) C/L BOAT LAUNCH E C D B V BASIN TRILLIUM FILTRATION BASIN BUCKBEAN FILTRATION BASIN FILTRATION BLAZING STAR PLAN SHEET LAYOUT B SIGNING & STRIPING PLANS EROSION CONTROL & TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS DRAINAGE PLANS CONSTRUCTION PLANS REMOVAL PLANS INPLACE TOPOGRAPHY PLANS EXISTING UTILITY PLANS GENERAL SHEET LAYOUT IDENTIFIER C D E 67 68 69 70 158 159 160 161 182 183 184 185 206 207 208 209 627 628 629 630 538 539 540 541 431 432 433 434 V 86 177 201 225 646 557 450 LAYOUT LEGEND INPLACE ROADWAY PROPOSED ROADWAY AREAS OF ENVIORNMENTAL SENSITIVITY SIGNAL SYSTEM 280 SHEET tombu1:14:57 PM4/25/2025pdf-B and W.pltcfg0T4M00197_pen.tblOF DATEBYREV. 12224 NICOLLET AVENUE BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 Phone: (952) 890-0509 Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.comR DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED DATELIC. NO.H:\CACO\0T4M00197\CAD\ORD\CACO-0T4M00197\plans\Misc\cd1002124_105gel003.dgnDefault FEETSCALE 1500 300 S.P. 010-596-016, S.P. 010-613-009, S.P. 241-020-003, S.P. 241-090-001 S.P. 1002-124, S.P. 1008-113, S.P. 010-596-014,MBMBMBMBMBMBMB MBMBMB MBMB MB MB MB??? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ??? ? ? ? ? 729 5 GENERAL LAYOUT TH 5 RECONSTRUCTION DMK TWB BAU 03/14/202559444 BENJAMIN A. ULRICH LRT REGIONAL TRAIL A/L LAKE MINNETONKA CONNECTION A/L MADELYN UNDERPASS WEST UNDERPASS A/L ARBORETUM NO. 10X29 BRIDGE BOX CULVERT CARVER COUNTY CITY OF VICTORIA SIGNAL SYSTEM B WALL D CIP RETAINING WALL F CIP RETAINING WALL E CIP RETAINING REINFORCED SOIL SLOPE C WALL C CIP RETAINING ADT (2045) = 23,600 ADT (2023) = 14,750 ADT (2045) = 30,400 ADT (2023) = 23,661ADT (2045) = 13,800ADT (2023) = 10,500ADT (2045) = 9,700ADT (2023) = 7,500 MATCHLINE STA 743+50MATCHLINE STA 786+00MATCHLINE STA 499+00 M ATCHLINE STA 526+00 TH 5 WB� TH 5 EB� A/L CSAH 13 SB A/L CSAH 13 NB A/L MADELYN UNDERPASS A/L CSAH 13 NB TRAIL A/L SWITCHBACK A/L CSAH 13 SB 78TH ST APPLEHOUSE ENTRANCE�ENTRANCE REGENTS� SIGNAL SYSTEM B NO. 10X27 BRIDGE BOX CULVERT E H 21261010101550050551051552052541 11500505510515520525745 750 755 760 765 770 775 780 785745750755760765770775780 785 40 55 35 100105BASIN FILTRATION BUTTERFLY WEED WET POND TROUT LILY F S G R W PLAN SHEET LAYOUT SIGNING & STRIPING PLANS EROSION CONTROL & TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS DRAINAGE PLANS CONSTRUCTION PLANS REMOVAL PLANS INPLACE TOPOGRAPHY PLANS EXISTING UTILITY PLANS GENERAL SHEET LAYOUT IDENTIFIER E F G H Q R S W 70 71 72 73 82 83 86 161 162 163 164 172 174 177173 185 186 187 188 196 198 201197 209 210 211 212 220 222 225221 630 631 632 633 642 643 646641 541 542 543 544 552 553 554 557 434 435 436 437 445 446 447 450 81 LAYOUT LEGEND INPLACE ROADWAY PROPOSED ROADWAY AREAS OF ENVIORNMENTAL SENSITIVITY SIGNAL SYSTEM 281 M BM BM BM BM BM BM BMB????? ? SHEET tombu1:14:58 PM4/25/2025pdf-B and W.pltcfg0T4M00197_pen.tblOF DATEBYREV. 12224 NICOLLET AVENUE BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 Phone: (952) 890-0509 Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.comR DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED DATELIC. NO.H:\CACO\0T4M00197\CAD\ORD\CACO-0T4M00197\plans\Misc\cd1002124_105gel004.dgnDefault FEETSCALE 1500 300 S.P. 010-596-016, S.P. 010-613-009, S.P. 241-020-003, S.P. 241-090-001 S.P. 1002-124, S.P. 1008-113, S.P. 010-596-014, 729 6 GENERAL LAYOUT TH 5 RECONSTRUCTION DMK TWB BAU 03/14/202559444 BENJAMIN A. ULRICH NO. 10X16 EX. BRIDGE EX. BOX CULVERT CARVER COUNTY CITY OF VICTORIA CARVER COUNTY CITY OF CHANHASSEN CITY OF CHANHASSENCITY OF VICTORIEASIGNAL SYSTEM C WALL G CIP RETAINING WALL H CIP RETAINING REINFORCED SOIL SLOPE C REINFORCED SOIL SLOPE B REINFORCED SOIL SLOPE A ADT (2045) = 3,800ADT (2023) = 2,150A D T (2045) = 30,400A D T (2023) = 23,661MATCHLINE STA 785+50MATCHLINE STA821+50 TH 5 WB� TH 5 EB� PKWY A/L MINNEWASHTA BEGIN S.P. 010-596-016 STA 806+00.00 TH 5 EB NO. 10064 BRIDGE 790 795 800 805810815820790 795 800 805810815820600605BASIN FILTRATION LADY SLIPPER H I J PLAN SHEET LAYOUT SIGNING & STRIPING PLANS EROSION CONTROL & TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS DRAINAGE PLANS CONSTRUCTION PLANS REMOVAL PLANS INPLACE TOPOGRAPHY PLANS EXISTING UTILITY PLANS GENERAL SHEET LAYOUT IDENTIFIER H I J 73 74 75 164 165 166 188 189 190 212 213 214 633 634 635 544 545 546 437 438 439 LAYOUT LEGEND INPLACE ROADWAY PROPOSED ROADWAY AREAS OF ENVIORNMENTAL SENSITIVITY SIGNAL SYSTEM 282 SHEET tombu1:14:59 PM4/25/2025pdf-B and W.pltcfg0T4M00197_pen.tblOF DATEBYREV. 12224 NICOLLET AVENUE BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 Phone: (952) 890-0509 Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.comR DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED DATELIC. NO.H:\CACO\0T4M00197\CAD\ORD\CACO-0T4M00197\plans\Misc\cd1002124_105gel005.dgnDefault FEETSCALE 1500 300 S.P. 010-596-016, S.P. 010-613-009, S.P. 241-020-003, S.P. 241-090-001 S.P. 1002-124, S.P. 1008-113, S.P. 010-596-014,???? ? ? 86 adjustment 729 7 GENERAL LAYOUT TH 5 RECONSTRUCTION DMK TWB BAU 03/14/202559444 BENJAMIN A. ULRICH CARVER COUNTY CITY OF CHANHASSEN REINFORCED SOIL SLOPE B ADT (2045) = 30,400 ADT (2023) = 23,661MATCHLINE STA 821+50MATCHLINE STA 858+50 TH 5 WB� TH 5 EB� A/L ARBORETUM DR EAST UNDERPASS A/L ARBORETUM UNDERPASS ARBORETUM EAST A/L TH 5 TRAIL AT END S.P. 010-596-016 STA 849+00.00 TH 5 EB NO. 10X28 BRIDGE BOX CULVERT LAYOUT LEGEND INPLACE ROADWAY PROPOSED ROADWAY AREAS OF ENVIORNMENTAL SENSITIVITY SIGNAL SYSTEM 100120 125830825830835 840 845 850 85582583083 5 840 845 850 855 POND BOG ASTER WET K L M PLAN SHEET LAYOUT SIGNING & STRIPING PLANS EROSION CONTROL & TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS DRAINAGE PLANS CONSTRUCTION PLANS REMOVAL PLANS INPLACE TOPOGRAPHY PLANS EXISTING UTILITY PLANS GENERAL SHEET LAYOUT IDENTIFIER K L M 76 77 78 167 168 169 191 192 193 215 216 217 636 637 638 547 548 549 440 441 442 283 ????????????????????? ??????????0 10 1551005385 390 395 400 405 410 4154 2 0 425 385 390 395 400 405 410 4154 2 0 42550050512025 3035860865870875880860865870875880SHEET tombu1:15:00 PM4/25/2025pdf-B and W.pltcfg0T4M00197_pen.tblOF DATEBYREV. 12224 NICOLLET AVENUE BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 Phone: (952) 890-0509 Email: Burnsville@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.comR DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED DATELIC. NO.H:\CACO\0T4M00197\CAD\ORD\CACO-0T4M00197\plans\Misc\cd1002124_105gel006.dgnDefault FEETSCALE 1500 300 S.P. 010-596-016, S.P. 010-613-009, S.P. 241-020-003, S.P. 241-090-001 S.P. 1002-124, S.P. 1008-113, S.P. 010-596-014, 729 8 GENERAL LAYOUT TH 5 RECONSTRUCTION DMK TWB BAU 03/14/202559444 BENJAMIN A. ULRICH CARVER COUNTY CITY OF CHANHASSEN SIGNAL SYSTEM D SIGNAL SYSTEM E REVISE WALL C PMB RETAINING WALL C PMB RETAINING ADT (2045) = 15,300 ADT (2023) = 11,427 ADT (2045) = 30,400ADT (2023) = 23,661ADT (2045) = 30,400ADT (2023) = 23,661ADT (2045) = 19,400 ADT (2023) = 14,315 TH 5 N B STA 430+00.00 (A H ) TH 5 N B STA 427+69.81 (B K ) = EQ U A TION: TH 5 WB STA 872+74.28 (AH) TH 5 WB STA 822+83.16 (BK)= EQUATION: TH 5 EB STA 872+75.26 (AH) TH 5 EB STA 822+33.78 (BK) = EQUATION:ADT (2045) = 29,600ADT (2023) = 28,392MATCHLINE STA 858+50 � TH 5 EB � TH 5 WB A/L TH 41 SB A/L TH 41 NB A/L W 78TH ST EB A/L TH 41 SB NE TRAIL A/L TH5-TH 41 UNDERPASS A/L TH5-TH 41 SE TRAIL A/L TH5-TH 41 CENTURY BLVD A/L TH 41 NB STA 383+20.36 TH 41 NB BEGIN S.P. 010-596-014 BEGIN S.P. 1008-113 NO. 10X22 EX BRIDGE EX BOX CULVERT STA 880+76.37 TH 5 EB END S.P. 010-596-014 END S.P. 1002-124 NO. 10X26 BRIDGE BOX CULVERT A/L W 78TH ST WB A/L TH 41 TRAIL STA 427+52.00 TH 41 NB END S.P. 010-596-014 END S.P. 1008-113 N O Z X Y M PLAN SHEET LAYOUT SIGNING & STRIPING PLANS EROSION CONTROL & TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS DRAINAGE PLANS CONSTRUCTION PLANS REMOVAL PLANS INPLACE TOPOGRAPHY PLANS EXISTING UTILITY PLANS GENERAL SHEET LAYOUT IDENTIFIER M N O X Y Z 78 79 80 87 88 89 169 170 171 178 179 180 193 194 195 202 203 204 217 218 219 226 227 228 638 639 640 647 648 549 550 551 558 559 560 442 443 444 451 452 453 649 LAYOUT LEGEND INPLACE ROADWAY PROPOSED ROADWAY AREAS OF ENVIORNMENTAL SENSITIVITY SIGNAL SYSTEM 284 City Council Item October 13, 2025 Item Quarterly Fire Department Update File No.Item No: F.1 Agenda Section FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE Prepared By Andrew Heger, Fire Chief Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Operational Excellence SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 285 City Council Item October 13, 2025 Item Quarterly Law Enforcement Update File No.Item No: F.2 Agenda Section FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE Prepared By Tyler Stahn, Lieutenant Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Operational Excellence SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 286 City Council Item October 13, 2025 Item Resolution #2025-XX, Approve vacating a portion of the public Right-of-Way of Dogwood Road File No.Vacation 25-01 Item No: G.1 Agenda Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Prepared By Mackenze Grunig, Project Engineer Reviewed By Mackenze Grunig SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves a resolution authorizing the vacation of a portion of the public right-of-way as dedicated in the Plats of Zimmerman Farm 1st Addition and Sunset Hill on Lake Minnewashta." Motion Type 4/5 Vote Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY Vacating a portion of the public right-of-way in order to clean up the excess right of way along Dogwood Rd. Public notice has been completed for the right-of-way vacation consistent with Minnesota Stat. 412.851. This action requires a Public Hearing. This vacation is not contingent on other actions. BACKGROUND 287 N/A DISCUSSION The current Right-of-Way along Dogwood Road does not follow the standard width of 60 feet the City typically has for Right-of-way. In order to continue being consistent, Staff have moved forward with vacating the excess right-of-way along the Southwest side of Dogwood Rd. BUDGET N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the vacation of partial right-of-way. ATTACHMENTS RESOLUTION VACATION OF DOGWOOD ROAD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR VACATION (PAPER) DOGWOOD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR VACATION (MAIL) DOGWOOD 25-0201 VACATION EXHBIT 5-29-25 Sunset Hill 1930 Plat Zimmerman Farms 1st Addition 288 237362v1 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE:_________________________ RESOLUTION NO: 2025-XX_______________ MOTION BY:____________________ SECONDED BY:__________________________ RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION OF DOGWOOD ROAD AS DEDICATED IN THE PLATS OF ZIMMERMAN FARM 1ST ADDITION AND SUNSET HILL ON LAKE MINNEWASHTA WHEREAS, The City of Chanhassen (“City”), is requesting vacation of a portion of Dogwood Road as legally described and depicted in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein (collectively referred to herein as “Easement”); WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 412.851 the City Council of the City of Chanhassen has conducted a hearing preceded by the statutorily required two (2) weeks published and posted notice and mailed notice to the abutting property owners, to consider the vacation of the Easement. WHEREAS, the vacation is necessary to “clean up” excess right of way for adjacent property owners. New right of way and easements are being dedicated where necessary to replace the vacated portions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council: 1. The vacation shall not affect the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling the electric or telephone poles and lines, gas lines, sanitary and storm sewer lines, water pipes, mains, hydrants, and natural drainage areas thereon or thereunder, to continue maintain the same or to enter upon such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereof. 2. The City Clerk shall transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the County Auditor and County Recorder. 289 237362v1 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 13th day of October, 2025. ATTEST: ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 290 237362v1 3 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR EASEMENT VACATION That portion of Dogwood Road dedicated within the Plats of Zimmerman Farm 1st Addition and Sunset Hill on Lake Minnewashta, Carver County, Minnesota, that lies westerly of the following described line: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, THE ARBORS SECOND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof; thence North 13 degrees 25 minutes 57 seconds West, assuming the East line of said Lot 1 bears North 13 degrees 25 minutes 57 seconds West, a distance of 103.92 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1 of said ZIMMERMAN FARM 1ST ADDITION; thence North 13 degrees 25 minutes 57 seconds West, along the West line of said Lot 1, Block 1, ZIMMERMAN FARM 1ST ADDITION and its Northerly extension, a distance of 427.03 feet; thence 141.02 feet Northerly along a tangential curve concave Easterly, having a radius of 400.00 feet, and a central angle of 20 degrees 11 minutes 58 seconds to the Westerly right of way line of Dogwood Road as dedicated on the recorded plat of SUNSET HILL ON LAKE MINNEWASHTA and said line there terminating. 291 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF CHANHASSEN COUNTY OF CARVER AND COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL MEETING October 13, 2025 7:00 p.m. CHANHASSEN CITY HALL 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council for the City of Chanhassen will hold a public hearing on Monday, October 13, 2025, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 412.851 to consider the vacation of the road right of way on that part of Dogwood Road as dedicated on the recorded plats of Sunset Hill on Lake Minnewashta and Zimmerman Farm 1st Addition, Carver County, Minnesota that lies Westerly of the following described line: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, THE ARBORS SECOND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof; thence North 13 degrees 25 minutes 57 seconds West, assuming the East line of said Lot 1 bears North 13 degrees 25 minutes 57 seconds West, a distance of 103.92 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1 of said ZIMMERMAN FARM 1ST ADDITION; thence North 13 degrees 25 minutes 57 seconds West, along the West line of said Lot 1, Block 1, ZIMMERMAN FARM 1ST ADDITION and its Northerly extension, a distance of 427.03 feet; thence 141.02 feet Northerly along a tangential curve concave Easterly, having a radius of 400.00 feet, and a central angle of 20 degrees 11 minutes 58 seconds to the Westerly right of way l ine of Dogwood Road as dedicated on the recorded plat of SUNSET HILL ON LAKE MINNEWASHTA and said line there terminating. and is depicted as follows: 292 All interested parties are encouraged to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. If you have any questions, please contact: Mackenze Grunig, Project Engineer Phone: (952) 227-1165 (Publish in the Sun Sailor on October 2 & 9, 2025) 293 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF CHANHASSEN COUNTY OF CARVER AND COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL MEETING October 13, 2025 7:00 p.m. CHANHASSEN CITY HALL 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council for the City of Chanhassen will hold a public hearing on Monday, October 13, 2025, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 412.851 to consider the vacation of the road right of way on that part of Dogwood Road as dedicated on the recorded plats of Sunset Hill on Lake Minnewashta and Zimmerman Farm 1st Addition, Carver County, Minnesota and depicted as follows: All interested parties are encouraged to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. If you have any questions, please contact: Mackenze Grunig, Project Engineer Phone: (952) 227-1165 294 295 296 297 298 City Council Item October 13, 2025 Item Ordinance: XXX Minnewashta Apartments Rezoning and Site Plan Review (Planning Case 25-11) File No.Planning Case #2025-11 Item No: H.1 Agenda Section GENERAL BUSINESS Prepared By Rachel Arsenault, Associate Planner Reviewed By Eric Maass SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts the attached ordinance rezoning the subject property and approving the site plan for construction of a 44-unit apartment building, subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY The applicant is proposing the rezoning of a 5.6-acre property to construct a 44-unit multi-family apartment building. The city has received approval from MnDOT for the installation of a temporary traffic signal at the intersection of Hwy 41 and Minnetonka Middle School West due to the upcoming Highway 5 reconstruction project. The traffic signal will be in place until a permanent roundabout is constructed in 2028. BACKGROUND This property was platted in 2015 as a part of the Beehive Home 2nd Addition. DISCUSSION 299 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed rezoning and site plan approval, subject to staff report comments. ATTACHMENTS Development Application Narrative Civil Plan Set Architectural Plan Set City Staff Report Findings of Fact City Council Rezoning Ordinance Traffic Memo MnDOT Review Comments Planning Commission Minutes 9-16 Public Comments Minnewashta Apartments 300 301 302 Minnewashta Apartments Submittal Narrative Proposal Headwaters Development is proposing a development of a vacant site (the “Site”) located at 6440 Hazeltine Blvd. The redevelopment will consist of the new construction of a 44-unit apartment complex. As part of the project, we propose to collaborate closely with the Trouvaille Memory Care facility as well as the City of Chanhassen to provide improved stormwater management for areas offsite. Site Location The Site is bordered by Hazeltine Blvd. to the east, Trouvaille Memory Care and a few single family homes to the north, Lake Minnewashta Regional Park on the east, and Herman Field Park on the western boundary. Zoning and Land Use The Site is approximately 5.51 acres. The present zoning is RSF, and the present land use designation has the property guided Residential Medium Density, which allows for 4-8 units per acre. The Residential Medium Density guidance allows for up to 44 units by right. We request a zoning change to the R-8 Zoning designation to facilitate this project. Site Design The design of the Site allows for separation from the existing neighborhood single-family homes. The proposed access to the Site would be from Hazeltine Boulevard. Due to the dynamic nature of the access given the future roundabout proposed for the intersection as well as the forthcoming detours due to the MN-5 project, our traffic consultant will be providing data which demonstrates options for interim and permanent traffic solutions. The Project will adhere to all landscaping requirements, allowing it to blend seamlessly into its surroundings and the existing neighborhood. New stormwater ponding will be constructed on the western portion of the site – the natural low spot. This ponding will serve the Project, as well as treat additional city stormwater from offsite areas which is currently being released untreated into the municipal storm system. Project Description Once completed the Project will contain forty-four (44) total units. 303 2 The newly constructed building, as currently contemplated, will contain a unit mix comprised of 17 one-bedroom units, 22 two-bedroom units, and 5 three-bedroom units. The following tables better illustrate the overall Project unit count and mix. Proposed Building Units Avg. SF One Bedroom Units 17 704 SF Two Bedroom Units 22 1,037 SF Three Bedroom Units 5 1,307 SF Total Units 44 Parking and Amenities Interior flnishes will include hard surface countertops, hard-surface fiooring except for carpet in the bedrooms and quality lighting and plumbing flxtures. Most, if not all, units will have private balconies, and all homes will have in-unit washer/dryers. Once complete each resident will have access to at least one enclosed garage stall. Overall, the project will contain a total of 88 parking stalls, or 2 stalls per unit. Trash will be collected within the building footprint. It will be set out on the designated trash day and the empty containers will be returned to the parking garage after collection. The new building will include shared amenity spaces for all Project residents to enjoy, including a sky lounge, outdoor patio and grilling stations, dog spa, and a pet play area. A connection to the existing city trail system will also be constructed as part of the Project. Architectural Design Exterior materials will be of high quality and durable, consisting of glass, wood or other quality materials as deemed acceptable by the city. The roof will be fiat. Landscaping will meet or exceed the code, and signage will comply with the sign ordinance for residential districts. Sustainability The project will utilize many green building methods during construction and the Project itself will include low fiow plumbing flxtures, low VOC paints, LED lighting where appropriate. 304 3 Financing and Public Benefit The proposed Project will not require direct flnancial assistance from the City of Chanhassen. Being said, we are working diligently with City staff to provide maximum public beneflt, speciflcally utilizing our ability to oversize our stormwater management system to handle offsite runoff currently not being treated at all from neighboring properties. We will be looking to offset the additional costs for providing this infrastructure with potential fee impact fee reductions as appropriate. We will continue working with staff to quantify and flnalize the costs and beneflt. Phasing and Construction Schedule It is anticipated that the project will commence construction Q4 2025. Initial activities will include site clearing, installation of utilities and infrastructure, rough grading and excavation, and then vertical construction. It is anticipated that the entire duration of construction will be approximately fourteen (14) months. Development Method Headwaters intends to develop and own the project upon completion. Based in the Twin- Cities, the principals of Headwaters have a successful track record of development, acquisition, and rehabilitation, of over 5,000 units translating to over $2 billion worth of projects spanning the Midwest, Central Plains, and Mountain West regions of the United States. 305 DescriptionRev.DateMINNEWASHTA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA07.11.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-102PMJM06/13/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Minnewashta MF\CAD\Sheets\COVER SHEET.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PRELIMINARY PLANSCLIENT:ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:ARCHITECT:MINNEWASHTA APARTMENTSSHEET INDEX:FOR:VICINITY MAP- NOT TO SCALEC1.0COVER SHEETMEASURE GROUP - PETE MOREAU, PE (MN)PO BOX 10WAYZATA, MN 55391PH: 612-440-0934EMAIL: PMOREAU@MEASUREGRP.COMMEASURE GROUP - JOSH MCKINNEY, PLA (MN)PO BOX 10WAYZATA, MN 55391PH: 612-440-0934EMAIL: JMCKINNEY@MEASUREGRP.COMHEADWATERS6757 KARMEN AVEALBERTVILLE, MNPH: 612-508-4627EMAIL: RCS@HEADWATERS.BUILDSHEET #SHEET NAMEC1.0COVER SHEETC2.0DEMOLITION PLANC3.0SITE PLANC4.0GRADING PLANC5.0UTILITY PLANC5.1STORM SEWER PLANC6.0PHASE 1 EROSION CONTROLC6.1PHASE 2 EROSION CONTROLC7.0SWPPP NARRATIVEC7.1SWPPP NARRATIVEC8.0CIVIL DETAILS - UTILITY DETAILSC8.1CIVIL DETAILS - STORM SEWER DETAILSC8.2CIVIL DETAILS - ADA DETAILSC8.3CIVIL DETAILS - SITE DETAILSL0.1TREE INVENTORYL1.0LANDSCAPE PLANKAAS WILSON ARCHITECTS - KIM BEHRENS1301 AMERICAN BLVD.BLOOMINTON, MN 55425PH: 612-279-8917EMAIL: KIMB@KAASWILSON.COMSITEMN H W Y 4 1 - H A Z E L T I N E B L V D MINNETONKAMIDDLE SCHOOLMN HWY 7306 MIN N E S O T A H I G H W A Y N O . 4 1 ( H A Z E L T I N E B L V D ) ORIOLE AVENUE OEOEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE G G G G G G G G G G G G||WLWLWL REMOVE SHEDREMOVE STAIRSREMOVE CURBREMOVE & SALVAGEHYDRANT FOR FUTURE USESALVAGE TRASH ENCLOSUREFOR REUSE ON SITEDescriptionRev.DateMINNEWASHTA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA07.11.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-102PMJM06/13/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Minnewashta MF\CAD\Sheets\DEMOLITION PLAN.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC2.0DEMOLITION PLANLEGENDEXISTINGPROPOSEDPROPERTY BOUNDARYLOT LINESETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINEEASEMENTSTANDARD CURB AND GUTTERFENCERETAINING WALLSCALE IN FEET080401.DEMOLITION NOTES ARE NOT COMPREHENSIVE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION TO OBTAIN A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF THE INTENDED SCOPE OF WORK.2. THE DESIGN SHOWN IS BASED ON ENGINEER'S UNDERSTANDING OF EXISTING CONDITIONS.THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED UPON ALTA AND TOPOGRAPHICMAPPING PREPARED BY XXXX DATED XX-XX-XXXX. IF CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPTEXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS WITHOUT EXCEPTION, CONTRACTOR SHALLHAVE MADE, AT OWN EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYORAND SUBMIT IT TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW.3. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSING INALOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES AND IN ACCORDANCE WITHAPPLICABLE CODES, OF ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING,DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC., SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ONTHE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TOSUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PERTHE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND/OR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.4.CLEARING AND GRUBBING: CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROMTHE SITE AND DISPOSING THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLEFOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL.5.. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DISCONNECTION OF UTILITY SERVICES TO EXISTINGBUILDINGS PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OF THE BUILDINGS.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO REMOVALAND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH UTILITYCOMPANIES CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITYCOMPANIES' FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO UTILITY COMPANIES FORSERVICES. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES.7. CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWNON THIS PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM INFORMATION AVAILABLE. ENGINEER ASSUMESNO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE UTILITY MAPPING ACCURACY. PRIOR TO START OF ANYDEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UTILITY COMPANIES 48 HOURS PRIORTO ANY EXCAVATION FOR ON-SITE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES. THE LOCATIONS OFUTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY CALLING MINNESOTA GOPHER STATEONE CALL AT 800-252-1166 OR651-454-0002.8.THE MAPPING LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING, AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TOBE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION, OR AS THE ONLY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ONTHE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANYANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTIONAND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK.UTILITIES DETERMINED TO BE ABANDONED SHALL BE REMOVED IF UNDER THE BUILDINGINCLUDING 10' BEYOND FOUNDATIONS.9.ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC CABLE AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BEREMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY.ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THEUTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE.CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE ROAD RIGHTOF WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION.10.CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES,ENCLOSURES, ETC., TO THE BEST PRACTICES.11.CONTINUOUS ACCESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AT ALLTIMES DURING DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING FACILITIES12.PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLEDAND APPROVED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY.13.CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT SAW-CUT & PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHEREIT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURREDON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR.14.CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING FEATURES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN. DAMAGE TO ANYEXISTING CONDITIONS TO REMAIN WILL BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.15.ABANDON OR REMOVE ALL SANITARY, WATER AND STORM SERVICES PER CITY STANDARDS.COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH CITY. ALL STREET RESTORATION SHALL BE COMPLETED INCOMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL STANDARDS.16.CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT TO THE GOVERNING AUTHORITY A TRAFFICAND/OR PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC PLAN PER CITY/COUNTY/STATE STANDARDS TO BE APPROVEDBY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY.DEMOLITION NOTES307 3 STORYMULTIFAMILY44 UNITSFFE: 1011.00GFE: 1000.33HYDSTORMWATERFILTRATION BASINTOP BERM: 995.00EO: 994.50HWL:994.39BOT:989.00BOT(SAND):985.25WLWLWL DDDPROPOSED PUBLICDRAINAGE, UTILITY ANDROADWAY EASEMENT9ABBAA4522340.0'116.8'8818.0'24.0'18.0'10.0'R10.0'R5.0'R37.0'R63.0'26.0'294.2'11771020.0'MIN N E S O T A H I G H W A Y N O . 4 1 ( H A Z E L T I N E B L V D ) ORIOLE AVENUE 6.0'7R20.0'R76.0'R20.0'11C666726.0'9910111111DescriptionRev.DateMINNEWASHTA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA07.11.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-102PMJM06/13/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Minnewashta MF\CAD\Sheets\SITE PLAN.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC3.0SITE PLANLEGENDDEVELOPMENT SUMMARYKEYNOTESB6-12 CURB & GUTTER1ZONING INFORMATIONCURRENT SITE ZONING:PROPOSED SITE ZONING:SITE DATATOTAL SITE AREA:DENSITYTOTAL UNITS:DENSITY:BUILDING SETBACKSFRONT:SIDE:REAR:PARKINGENCLOSEDEXTERIORTOTALSITE PARKING RATIOPARKING DIMENSIONSSTALL DIMENSIONSDRIVE AISLE WIDTHIMPERVIOUS SURFACEREQUIREDPROPOSEDRSFR-85.60 ACRES20'20'10'44 STALLS44 STALLS88 STALLS44 STALLS44 STALLS88 STALLS2 STALLSPER UNIT2 STALLSPER UNIT19.3%9x18'24'9'x18'24'&26'8 UPA MAX44 UNITS8 UPAADA SIGNAGE & BOLLARDS - SEE CIVIL DETAILS2ADA PARKING STRIPING - SEE CIVIL DETAILS34FLUSH CURB5CONCRETE SIDEWALK67RETAINING WALL WITH FENCE8CURB TAPERMATCH EXISTINGPROPOSEDPROPERTY BOUNDARYSETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINEEASEMENTSTANDARD CURB AND GUTTERHEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONCRETE SIDEWALKHEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENTFENCERETAINING WALL (BY OTHERS)TRAFFIC SIGNLIGHT POLESCALE IN FEET08040ARCHITECTURAL STOOP - COORDINATE WITH STRUCTURALDESIGN BY OTHERSAB116.8'40'294.2'50% MAXCLIGHT POLE WITH FOUNDATIONFIRE LANE - NO PARKING SIGNAGESTOP SIGN9END CONCRETE CURB, START BITUMINOUS EDGE10WETLAND BUFFER SIGNAGE - MCWD REQUIREMENT11308 MIN N E S O T A H I G H W A Y N O . 4 1 ( H A Z E L T I N E B L V D ) ORIOLE AVENUE OEOEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE G G G G G G G G G G G G||3 STORYMULTIFAMILY44 UNITSFFE: 1011.00GFE: 1000.33HYDSTORMWATERFILTRATION BASINTOP BERM: 995.00EO: 994.50HWL:994.39BOT:989.00BOT(SAND):985.25WLWLWL DDDSSSPROPOSED PUBLICDRAINAGE, UTILITY ANDROADWAY EASEMENTLODLODLOD LOD LOD LODLODLOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LODLODL O D L O D L O DLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLO D LO D LO D LO D LO D LO D LO D LO D LO D LO D -1.6%-4 .9% -1.4% -1.7%-1.6%-33.3%-2.3%-2.0%-5.0%-2.4 %-2.0%-2.0%-33.3%-24.4%-33.3%-7.5%-33.5%-27.5%-33.3%-2.2%-7.5%-5.1%-6.5%-10.0%-4.5%-1.5% -2.0%-4.5%-2.5%-33.3%-33.3% 10 1 9 1 0 2 0 10 2 11012101310141015101610171 0 1 8 101910201016 1017 1018 10161017101898498598698798898998798898999098910229959969979989991000100110021003100410051006100710081009 10101011101210071008 1009 1010 101 1 1012 1013 1014 10151001100299699799899910001001 9951017 1018 1010 1011 1011101510 2 1 10101011 985985995995989995989995996982985979990995990980990995980985990995995988989985990995993989995996 9849939919899919961010100810091000 1015101610131014-3 .8%1011.001011.001011.001011.001009.801009.001007.50 TW1001.00 BW1000.23999.83999.801000.101000.001000.001010.501011.001008.951009.501009.651009.651009.901009.901010.001009.701010.001013.101012.901012.501018.901018.501016.351020.30 M.E.1007.70 E.O.1007.501007.601007.201017.201018.501002.40 TW1001.90 BW1000.90 BW1007.00 TW997.00 BW1008.50 TW1012.20 BW1013.20 TW996.50 BW1010.80 TW1010.00 BW1012.00 TW1010.251010.601010.201009.001018.271018.001005.80 TW1004.80 TW1017.001018.371013.901014.001010.601010.801010.701011.701011.801009.721009.551009.45994.50 E.O.1000.101000.001000.001000.001000.001000.101010.501010.001010.001010.501009.901009.901022.101022.101011.001009.201009.801011.301008.901008.751008.401009.601009.001008.661009.101009.051011.001010.921010.60995.00996.00995.00995.00995.00995.00995.00995.00995.00995.00995.00995.00995.001012.001012.201012.001017.501019.301018.60 M.E.10171018-0.6%101710181010.20 E.O.1010.501010.50DescriptionRev.DateMINNEWASHTA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA07.11.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-102PMJM06/13/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Minnewashta MF\CAD\Sheets\GRADING PLAN.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC4.0GRADING PLANLEGENDGRADING NOTES1.LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES ASSHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFYSITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TOEXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELYIF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND.2.CONTRACTORS SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACTLOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE, SLOPED PAVEMENT, EXITPORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS, EXACTBUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS, AND EXACT LOCATIONS ANDNUMBER OF DOWNSPOUTS.3.ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF"STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRENCH EXCAVATION ANDBACKFILL/SURFACE RESTORATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERSASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA.4.ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE SIX INCHES OF TOPSOIL ANDSOD OR SEED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OFGRASS IS OBTAINED. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANTING AND TURFESTABLISHMENT.5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAININGTRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS,DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OFTRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BEAPPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROLDEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS6.ALL SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED TO 3:1 OR FLATTER, UNLESS OTHERWISEINDICATED ON THIS SHEET.7.CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADINGAND PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITH UNIFORM SLOPES BETWEENPOINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS ANDEXISTING GRADES.8.SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE FINISHED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS &GUTTER FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARETO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE.9.SEE SOILS REPORT FOR PAVEMENT THICKNESSES AND HOLD DOWNS.10.CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ANY EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL THAT EXISTSAFTER THE SITE GRADING AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. THECONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL IN A MANNERACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND THE REGULATING AGENCIES.11.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL DESIGNCERTIFIED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER.12.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL RULESINCLUDING THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM(NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.13.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY STRUCTURE OR PAVEMENT, A PROOF ROLL, ATMINIMUM, WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE SUBGRADE. PROOF ROLLING SHALL BEACCOMPLISHED BY MAKING MINIMUM OF 2 COMPLETE PASSES WITHFULLY-LOADED TANDEM-AXLE DUMP TRUCK, OR APPROVED EQUAL, IN EACH OF2 PERPENDICULAR DIRECTIONS WHILE UNDER SUPERVISION AND DIRECTION OFTHE INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY. AREAS OF FAILURE SHALL BEEXCAVATED AND RE-COMPACTED AS SPECIFIED HEREIN.14.EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED BENEATH BUILDINGS AND STREET OR PARKINGAREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED DENSITYMETHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3F1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THEGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.15.EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD, STREETS ORPARKING AREA, SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTSOF THEORDINARY COMPACTION METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3F2.16.ALL SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENTGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVINGUNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THEGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORCOORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THEGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.SCALE IN FEET08040PROPERTY BOUNDARYEXISTING CONTOURPROPOSED CONTOURSETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINEEASEMENTSTANDARD CURB AND GUTTERSTORM SEWERFLARED END SECTIONRETAINING WALLDRAINTILEGRADING LIMITSSPOT ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONEMERGENCY OVERFLOWLODD-1.50%1000.00E.O.SPOT ELEV. LABELSM.E.=MATCH EXISTINGTW=TOP OF WALLBW=BOTTOM OF WALLTC=TOP OF CURB309 MIN N E S O T A H I G H W A Y N O . 4 1 ( H A Z E L T I N E B L V D ) ORIOLE AVENUE OEOEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE G G G G G G G G G G G G||3 STORYMULTIFAMILY44 UNITSFFE: 1011.00GFE: 1000.33HYDSTORMWATERFILTRATION BASINTOP BERM: 995.00EO: 994.50HWL:994.39BOT:989.00BOT(SAND):985.25WLWLWL |||| | ||||| |||||DDDSSSPROPOSED PUBLICDRAINAGE, UTILITY ANDROADWAY EASEMENT150'8" COMBINEDFIRE & DOMESTIC SERVICECOORD. W/ MEP8"X6" TEE6" GAVE VALVEAND HYDRANT8" 45° BEND8" GATE VALVE8" SANITARY SERVICE STUBCOORD. W/ MEPIE=1002.3MH-3RIM: 1009.40INV(S): 1001.4INV(N): 1001.3MH-2RIM: 1012.00INV(S): 998.94INV(E): 998.84MH-1DROP MH*RIM: 1014.00INV(W): 994.6INV(E): 991.10CORE DRILL AND CONNECTTO EXISTING MANHOLE*RIM:1012.00INV(S): 989.82*INV(N): 989.72*CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRMEXISTING INV. AND NOTIFYENGINEER IF A DISCREPANCY EXISTS64 LF -8" PVC @ 2.00%217 LF -8" PVC @ 2.00%44 LF -8" PVC @ 2.00%118 LF -8" PVC @ 2.00%8" 45° BEND8" 45° BEND8" 45° BEND8" 45° BENDCONNECT TO EXISTING(1) 8"X8" TEE(1) 8" GATE VALVEPER CITY STANDARDSEXISTING HYDRANTTO BE RELOCATED8" 45° BEND &8" 22.5° BEND1234DescriptionRev.DateMINNEWASHTA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA07.11.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-102PMJM06/13/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Minnewashta MF\CAD\Sheets\UTILITY PLAN.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC5.0UTILITY PLANLEGENDUTILITY NOTES1.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATIONOF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THEVARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THEINFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THECONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ANDNOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES.2.ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATER MAIN MATERIAL AND INSTALLATIONSSHALL BE PER CITY REQUIREMENTS, MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, AND IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION AS PREPAREDBY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM).3.PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARY FEDERAL,STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSED WORK OR VERIFY WITH THE OWNER ORENGINEER THAT PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMIT FEES SHALL BE THERESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION ANDDIMENSIONS OF DOORWAYS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS,AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTION LOCATIONS.5.ALL PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESPECIFICATIONS OF THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLCOORDINATE THE SERVICE LINE CONSTRUCTION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES.6.CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY CITY PERMITS FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONSAND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. THE CITY SHALL BENOTIFIED 48-HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION OR ANYREQUIRED TESTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE, INTERFERE WITH, CONNECT ANYPIPE OR HOSE TO, OR TAP ANY WATER MAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULYAUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF SCHEDULED ORUNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITYOF THE CONTRACTOR.7.PROVIDE WATER MAIN THRUST RESTRAINTS PER CITY STANDARD REQUIREMENTS.8.PER MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY REQUIREMENTS, A MINIMUM OF 18INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIREDFROM WATERMAIN TO ANY MANHOLE, SEPTIC SYSTEM, CATCH BASIN, SEWER PIPE, OROTHER SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION, MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TOTHE OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.9.UTILITY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE 5' OUTSIDE BUILDING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISESHOWN OR NOTED.10.WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL EITHER BE AWWA C900 PVC WITH DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS ANDRISERS, OR DIP CLASS 52.11.ALL WATER LINES SHALL HAVE 8' MINIMUM COVER (TOP OF PIPE TO FINISH GRADE).INSULATE WATER MAIN IF LESS THAN 8' OF COVER. INSULATION SHALL BE DOWSTYROFOAM HI BRAND 35 OR EQUIVALENT, WITH 4 INCHES OF THICKNESS.12.SANITARY SEWER PIPE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE THAT IS 8" OR GREATER SHALL BEPOLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 26. SCHEDULE 40 MUST BE USED IS THE PIPE IS 6" ORSMALLER. C900 IS REQUIRED FOR DEPTHS GREATER THAN 20 FEET. SANITARY SEWER PIPEWITHIN 5 FEET OF THE BUILDING AND UNDER FOOTINGS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PERASTM D2665. ALL PLASTIC SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE INSTALLED PER D2321. SOLVENTWELD JOINTS MUST INCLUDE USE OF A PRIMER WHICH IS OF A CONTRASTING COLOR TOTHE PIPE AND CEMENT. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE TESTED COMPLIANT TO CURRENTMINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE.13.STORM SEWER PIPE:13.1.HDPE OR POLYPROPYLENE PIPE MAY BE INSTALLED WITH APPROVAL OF LOCALGOVERNING AGENCIES.13.2.HDPE STORM PIPE 4- TO 60-INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OFASTM F2648. FITTINGS SHALL BE PER ASTM F2306 AND INSTALLED PER ASTM D2321.13.3.POLYPROPYLENE STORM PIPE 12- TO 60-INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEETREQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2881. APPROVED FITTINGS SHALL MEET JOINTPERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM D3212. AT PIPE JOINTS, THE SPIGOT SHALLUTILIZE TWO GASKETS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F477. INSTALL INACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321.13.4.PVC STORM SEWER PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PIPE PER ASTM D2665AND INSTALLED PER ASTM D2321.13.5.IF REQUIRED BY AHJ, REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 5 FOR PIPEDIAMETERS 18" AND SMALLER AND CLASS 3 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 21" AND LARGERUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, PER ASTM C76 WITH R-4 GASKETS.14.ALL PORTIONS OF SANITARY & STORM SEWER SYSTEMS, INCLUDING STRUCTURES,LOCATED WITHIN 10-FEET OF A BUILDING AND/OR WATER LINE SHALL BE TESTED INACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4714 AND CURRENT MINNESOTAPLUMBING CODE.PROPOSEDPROPERTY BOUNDARYEASEMENTCURB AND GUTTERWATER MAINHYDRANTGATE VALVESANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERFLARED END SECTION W/ RIP RAP & TRASH GUARDDRAINTILERETAINING WALLGASUNDERGROUND ELECTRICOVERHEAD ELECTRICTELEPHONE/FIBERLIGHT POLE|||GGUEUTSCALE IN FEET08040SUTILITY CROSSING TABLECROSSING #UPPER UTILITY BOTTOMOF PIPELOWER UTILITY TOPOF PIPE1STORM = 1004.52SAN = 1001.372WM = 1003.37SAN = 999.623STORM = 1004.90SAN = 999.214STORM = 1004.16WM = 1000.63DOE310 MIN N E S O T A H I G H W A Y N O . 4 1 ( H A Z E L T I N E B L V D ) ORIOLE AVENUE OEOEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE G G G G G G G G G G G G||3 STORYMULTIFAMILY44 UNITSFFE: 1011.00GFE: 1000.33HYDSTORMWATERFILTRATION BASINTOP BERM: 995.00EO: 994.50HWL:994.39BOT:989.00BOT(SAND):985.25WLWLWL |||||||||||||||DDDSSSPROPOSED PUBLICDRAINAGE, UTILITY ANDROADWAY EASEMENTSTUB FOR FUTURE CONNECTIONINV: 1013.20STMH-101RIM: 971.00INV(E): 965.50INV(SW): 961.00122 LF - 15" HDPE @ 3.30%FES-100INV: 957.00OCS-103 (SEE DETAIL)RIM: 994.00 TO 995.00TOP WEIR WALL: 994.0015" R.C. ORIFICE: 991.00(15") INV(E): 989.50(DT) INV: 985.50INV(W): 981.00FES-104INV: 989.00FES-200INV: 993.00STMH-102RIM: 981.00INV(E): 975.50INV(W): 971.0045 LF - 15" HDPE @ 12.20%45 LF - 15" HDPE @ 12.20%14 LF - 15" HDPE @ -3.50%CB-201RIM: 1003.50(24") INV(E): 995.30(24") INV(W): 995.30SUMP: 992.30STMH-202RIM: 1006.40(12") INV(S): 1003.80(24") INV(E): 1001.00(24") INV(W): 997.00STMH-203RIM: 1015.90(24") INV(E): 1007.30(24") INV(W): 1007.30CB-301RIM: 1007.20(12") INV(N): 1003.90(12") INV(SE): 1003.90SUMP: 1000.90CB-302RIM: 1008.90(12") INV(E): 1004.35(12") INV(NW): 1004.35SUMP: 1001.35STMH-303RIM: 1010.10(12") INV(S): 1004.60(12") INV(W): 1004.60DRAIN BASIN-304RIM: 1009.00(12") INV(N): 1005.00SUMP: 1002.0086 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50%46 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50%91 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50%20 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.50%150 LF - 24" HDPE @ 3.90%160 LF - 24" HDPE @ 3.90%46 LF - 24" HDPE@ 3.80%61 LF - 24" HDPE@ 3.80%CLASS III RIP RAP|||GGUEUTSCALE IN FEET08040SDescriptionRev.DateMINNEWASHTA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA07.11.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-102PMJM06/13/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Minnewashta MF\CAD\Sheets\UTILITY PLAN.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC5.1STORM SEWER PLANLEGENDPROPOSEDPROPERTY BOUNDARYEASEMENTCURB AND GUTTERWATER MAINHYDRANTGATE VALVESANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERFLARED END SECTION W/ RIP RAP & TRASH GUARDDRAINTILERETAINING WALLGASUNDERGROUND ELECTRICOVERHEAD ELECTRICTELEPHONE/FIBERLIGHT POLEDOESTORM SEWER NOTES1.STORM SEWER PIPE:1.1.HDPE OR POLYPROPYLENE PIPE MAY BE INSTALLED WITH APPROVAL OF LOCAL GOVERNINGAGENCIES.1.2.HDPE STORM PIPE 4- TO 60-INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ASTMF2648. FITTINGS SHALL BE PER ASTM F2306 AND INSTALLED PER ASTM D2321.1.3.POLYPROPYLENE STORM PIPE 12- TO 60-INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OFASTM F2881. APPROVED FITTINGS SHALL MEET JOINT PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS OFASTM D3212. AT PIPE JOINTS, THE SPIGOT SHALL UTILIZE TWO GASKETS MEETING THEREQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F477. INSTALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321.1.4.PVC STORM SEWER PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PIPE PER ASTM D2665 ANDINSTALLED PER ASTM D2321.1.5.IF REQUIRED BY AHJ, REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 5 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 18"AND SMALLER AND CLASS 3 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 21" AND LARGER UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED, PER ASTM C76 WITH R-4 GASKETS.FOR GENERAL UTILITY NOTES, SEE SHEET C5.0.311 MIN N E S O T A H I G H W A Y N O . 4 1 ( H A Z E L T I N E B L V D ) ORIOLE AVENUE OEOEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE G G G G G G G G G G G G||STORM BASINTOP BERM: 995.00EO: 994.70HWL:993.68BOT:989.00PER AS-BUILTS,30" RCPIE +/-957.00wetland is 957.00 to 958.0030" RCP@0.46%LODLODLOD LOD LOD LODLODLOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LODLODLO D L O D L O DLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLO D LO D LO D LO D LO D LO D LO D LO D LO D LO DWLWLWL INSTALL ROCK ENTRANCEPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL SILT FENCEPER CIVIL DETAILSDescriptionRev.DateMINNEWASHTA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA07.11.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-102PMJM06/13/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Minnewashta MF\CAD\Sheets\EROSION CONTROL PLANS.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC6.0PHASE 1EROSIONCONTROLLEGENDPROPOSEDPROPERTY BOUNDARYINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOURSETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINEEASEMENTSTANDARD CURB AND GUTTERSTORM SEWERFLARED END SECTIONWATER MAINSANITARY SEWERRETAINING WALLDRAINTILEGRADING LIMITSSPOT ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONEMERGENCY OVERFLOWWALL LABEL|LODSCALE IN FEET08040DEROSION CONTROL NOTES1.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ONRECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTSTAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEINGEXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONSPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OFDISCREPANCIES.2.ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN-PLACEPRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINEDUNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUNDCOVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILTFENCE ON-SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BECONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREMEIMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECTTO EROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAYBALES, ETC.,REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT.3.EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL (ESC): THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUMECOMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLLING ALL SILTATION AND EROSIONOF THE PROJECT AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHATEVER MEANSNECESSARY TO CONTROL THE EROSION AND SILTATION INCLUDING BUT NOTLIMITED TO: CATCH BASIN INSERTS, CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET, AND SILT FENCE. ESC SHALL COMMENCE WITH GRADINGAND CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THEWORK BYTHE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDES ALLIMPLEMENTATION AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITINGOF SILT. THE OWNER MAY DIRECT THE CONTRACTOR'S METHODS AS DEEMEDFIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS. ANY DEPOSITION OF SILT ORMUD ON NEW OR EXISTING PAVEMENT OR IN EXISTING STORM SEWERS ORSWALES SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT. AFFECTED AREAS SHALLBE CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT THE EXPENSE OFTHE CONTRACTOR. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE REMOVEDBY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THE TURF IS ESTABLISHED.4.ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THEEND OF EACH WORKING DAY. A CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUSTBE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTOPUBLIC STREETS.5.PROPOSED PONDS SHALL BE EXCAVATED FIRST AND USED AS TEMPORARYPONDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.6.WHEN INSTALLING END-OF-LINE FLARED END SECTIONS, BRING THE SILT FENCEUP & OVER THE FLARED END SECTIONS & COVER DISTURBED AREAS WITH RIPRAP. THE UPSTREAM FLARED END SECTIONS SHALL HAVE WOOD FIBER BLANKETINSTALLED ON THE DISTURBED SOILS.7.ALL UNPAVED AREAS ALTERED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST BERESTORED WITH SEED AND MULCH, SOD, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR BEHARD SURFACED WITHIN 2 WEEKS OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.8.THE SITE MUST BE STABILIZED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MPCA, NPDES,MNDOT, AND CITY.A. TEMPORARY (GREATER THAN 1-YEAR) SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 22-111AT 30.5-POUNDS PER ACRE.B. TEMPORARY (LESS THAN 1-YEAR) SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112(FALL) OR 21-111 (SPRING/SUMMER) AT 100-POUNDS PER ACREC.INFILTRATION/FILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 34-262 AT14.5-POUNDS PER ACRE.D. POND SLOPES SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 AT 35-POUNDS PER ACRE.E. GENERAL SEEDING SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 25-151 AT 70-POUNDS PERACRE.F. MULCH SHALL BE MNDOT TYPE 1 APPLIED AT 2-TONS PER ACRE.9.FOR AREAS WITH SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER, RESTORATION WITH SOD OREROSION CONTROL BLANKET IS REQUIRED.10.ALL TEMPORARY STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE INSTALLED AROUNDTHEM TO TRAP SEDIMENT.11.ALL PERMANENT PONDS USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS DURINGCONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DREDGED AFTER THE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED TORESTORE THE POND TO THE PROPOSED BOTTOM ELEVATION.12.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL AND STATE RULESINCLUDING THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM(NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.13.THE SITE MUST BE KEPT IN A WELL-DRAINED CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. THECONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TEMPORARY DITCHES, PIPING, OROTHER MEANS REQUIRED TO INSURE PROPER DRAINAGE DURINGCONSTRUCTION. LOW POINTS IN ROADWAYS OR BUILDING PADS MUST BEPROVIDED WITH A POSITIVE OUTFLOW.312 MIN N E S O T A H I G H W A Y N O . 4 1 ( H A Z E L T I N E B L V D ) ORIOLE AVENUE OEOEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE G G G G G G G G G G G G||STORM BASINTOP BERM: 995.00EO: 994.70HWL:993.68BOT:989.00PER AS-BUILTS,30" RCPIE +/-957.00wetland is 957.00 to 958.0030" RCP@0.46%LODLODLOD LOD LOD LODLODLOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LODLODL O D L O D L O DLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLO D LO D LO D LO D LO D LO D LO D LO D LO D LO D -1.6%-4. 9% -1.4% -1.7%-1.6%-33.3%-2.3%-2.0%-5.0%-2.4%-2.0%-2.0%-33.3%-24.4%-33.3%-7.5%-33.5% -27 .5% -33. 3 % -2.2% -7.5 %-5.1%-6.5%-10.0%-4.5% -1.5% -2.0%-4.5%-2.5%-33.3% -33.3% 1019 10 2 0 102 1 1012 1013101410151016101710 1 8 1019 102 0 1016 1017 1018 10 1610171018 984985986987988989987988989990989 10229959969979989991000100110021003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010101110121007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 10151001100299699799899910001001 9951017 1018 1010 1011 101110151021 1010 1011 985985995995989995989995996982985979990995 990980990995980985990995995988989985990995993989995 996 9849939919899919961 0 1 0100810091000 1015101610131014-3 .8%10171018-0.6%101710 1 83 STORYMULTIFAMILY44 UNITSFFE: 1011.00GFE: 1000.33HYDSTORMWATERFILTRATION BASINTOP BERM: 995.00EO: 994.50HWL:994.39BOT:989.00BOT(SAND):985.25WLWLWL DDDPROPOSED PUBLICDRAINAGE, UTILITY ANDROADWAY EASEMENTINSTALL ROCK ENTRANCEPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL INLET PROTECTIONPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL BIOROLLSPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL INLET PROTECTIONPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL INLET PROTECTIONPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL EROSION CONTROLBLANKET PER CIVIL DETAILSDescriptionRev.DateMINNEWASHTA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA07.11.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-102PMJM06/13/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Minnewashta MF\CAD\Sheets\EROSION CONTROL PLANS.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC6.1PHASE 2EROSIONCONTROLLEGENDSCALE IN FEET08040EROSION CONTROL NOTES1.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ONRECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTSTAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEINGEXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONSPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OFDISCREPANCIES.2.ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN-PLACEPRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINEDUNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUNDCOVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILTFENCE ON-SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BECONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREMEIMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECTTO EROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAYBALES, ETC.,REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT.3.EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL (ESC): THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUMECOMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLLING ALL SILTATION AND EROSIONOF THE PROJECT AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHATEVER MEANSNECESSARY TO CONTROL THE EROSION AND SILTATION INCLUDING BUT NOTLIMITED TO: CATCH BASIN INSERTS, CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET, AND SILT FENCE. ESC SHALL COMMENCE WITH GRADINGAND CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THEWORK BYTHE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDES ALLIMPLEMENTATION AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITINGOF SILT. THE OWNER MAY DIRECT THE CONTRACTOR'S METHODS AS DEEMEDFIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS. ANY DEPOSITION OF SILT ORMUD ON NEW OR EXISTING PAVEMENT OR IN EXISTING STORM SEWERS ORSWALES SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT. AFFECTED AREAS SHALLBE CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT THE EXPENSE OFTHE CONTRACTOR. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE REMOVEDBY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THE TURF IS ESTABLISHED.4.ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THEEND OF EACH WORKING DAY. A CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUSTBE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTOPUBLIC STREETS.5.PROPOSED PONDS SHALL BE EXCAVATED FIRST AND USED AS TEMPORARYPONDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.6.WHEN INSTALLING END-OF-LINE FLARED END SECTIONS, BRING THE SILT FENCEUP & OVER THE FLARED END SECTIONS & COVER DISTURBED AREAS WITH RIPRAP. THE UPSTREAM FLARED END SECTIONS SHALL HAVE WOOD FIBER BLANKETINSTALLED ON THE DISTURBED SOILS.7.ALL UNPAVED AREAS ALTERED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST BERESTORED WITH SEED AND MULCH, SOD, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR BEHARD SURFACED WITHIN 2 WEEKS OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.8.THE SITE MUST BE STABILIZED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MPCA, NPDES,MNDOT, AND CITY.A. TEMPORARY (GREATER THAN 1-YEAR) SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 22-111AT 30.5-POUNDS PER ACRE.B. TEMPORARY (LESS THAN 1-YEAR) SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112(FALL) OR 21-111 (SPRING/SUMMER) AT 100-POUNDS PER ACREC.INFILTRATION/FILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 34-262 AT14.5-POUNDS PER ACRE.D. POND SLOPES SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 AT 35-POUNDS PER ACRE.E. GENERAL SEEDING SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 25-151 AT 70-POUNDS PERACRE.F. MULCH SHALL BE MNDOT TYPE 1 APPLIED AT 2-TONS PER ACRE.9.FOR AREAS WITH SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER, RESTORATION WITH SOD OREROSION CONTROL BLANKET IS REQUIRED.10.ALL TEMPORARY STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE INSTALLED AROUNDTHEM TO TRAP SEDIMENT.11.ALL PERMANENT PONDS USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS DURINGCONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DREDGED AFTER THE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED TORESTORE THE POND TO THE PROPOSED BOTTOM ELEVATION.12.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL AND STATE RULESINCLUDING THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM(NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.13.THE SITE MUST BE KEPT IN A WELL-DRAINED CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. THECONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TEMPORARY DITCHES, PIPING, OROTHER MEANS REQUIRED TO INSURE PROPER DRAINAGE DURINGCONSTRUCTION. LOW POINTS IN ROADWAYS OR BUILDING PADS MUST BEPROVIDED WITH A POSITIVE OUTFLOW.PROPERTY BOUNDARYEXISTING CONTOURPROPOSED CONTOURSETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINEEASEMENTSTANDARD CURB AND GUTTERSTORM SEWERFLARED END SECTIONRETAINING WALLDRAINTILEGRADING LIMITSSPOT ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONEMERGENCY OVERFLOWROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETINLET PROTECTIONSILT FENCEBIOROLLLODD-1.50%1000.00E.O.313 DescriptionRev.DateMINNEWASHTA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA07.11.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-102PMJM06/13/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Minnewashta MF\CAD\Sheets\SWPPP NARRATIVE & NOTES.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC7.0SWPPP NARRATIVESWPPP NARRATIVETHE SWPPP IS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES)REGULATIONS AS ESTABLISHED BY THE CLEAN WATER ACT. THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY'S CONSTRUCTIONGENERAL PERMIT MN R100001 (CSGP) (EXPIRATION DATE JULY 31, 2023) PROVIDES A FRAME WORK OF REQUIREMENTS FORCOMPLIANCE TO DISCHARGE STORMWATER FROM A CONSTRUCTION SITE.THE SWPPP IS FOR IMPLEMENTATION BY THE OWNER AND OPERATOR, AS LISTED BELOW, AT SANTA VERA APARTMENTS. THIS REPORTSHALL BE ON THE SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE OWNER MUST ALSO KEEP THIS SWPPP ON FILE FOR THREE YEARSAFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION. THE FOLLOWING ARE OUTLINED IN THIS SWPPP:- CONTROL MEASURES FOR STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PRIOR TO AND DURING CONSTRUCTION- CONTROL MEASURES FOR STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION AFTER CONSTRUCTION- SOURCES OF STORMWATER AND NON-STORMWATER POLLUTION- INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE PROCEDURESTHE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN PREPARED FOR MINNEWASHTA APARTMENTS SHALL BE CONSIDERED PART OF THESWPPP.PROJECT LOCATIONTHIS DOCUMENT PRESENTS A STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) FOR MINNEWASHTA APARTMENTS INCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA. THE SITE IS LOCATED ON 5.60ACRES NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF MN 41 AND MINNETONKA MIDDLESCHOOL-WEST.PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATIONOWNER/DEVELOPER: HEADWATERS DEVELOPMENTOWNER ADDRESS:6757 KARMEN AVENUEALBERTVILLE, MNOWNER EMAIL: RCS@HEADWATERS.BUILDCONTRACTOR: TBDCOMPANY NAME: TBDIDENTIFY PERSONNEL INVOLVED WITH THE PROJECT AND THEIR RELATED NECESSARY TRAINING COMMENSURATE WITH THEIR TASKPRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.SWPPP DESIGNER: MEASURE GROUP, LLCPETER MOREAUPO BOX 10WAYZATA, MN 55391612-440-0934PMOREAU@MEASUREGRP.COMDESIGN OF CONSTRUCTION SWPPP, U OF M 05/31/28SWPPP INSPECTION:TBDBMP INSTALLER:TBDOWNER/OPERATOR RESPONSIBILITIESOWNER·DEVELOPMENT OF SWPPP PRIOR TO APPLICATION/NOI SUBMITTAL.·SUBMIT A COMPLETE AND ACCURATE APPLICATION FORM (NOI)·COMPLIANCE WITH ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT·SWPPP SUBMITTAL FOR 30 DAY REVIEW FOR PROTECT GREATER THAN 50 ACRES & DISCHARGING TO SPECIAL/IMPAIREDWATERS WITHIN 1 MILE OF SITE DISCHARGE.·KEEPING PERMIT COVERAGE UP-TO-DATE (TRANSFER/SUBDIVISION)·SUBMIT NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ALL PERMIT TERMINATION CONDITIONS AS LISTED IN SECTION13 ARE COMPLETE·SUBMIT NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) WITHIN 30 DAYS OF MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF FINAL STABILIZATION·IDENTIFY WHO HAS LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER SYSTEM.·DEVELOP CHAIN OF RESPONSIBILITY WITH ALL OPERATORS TO ENSURE NPDES COMPLIANCE.·IDENTIFY TRAINED PERSONNEL TO DEVELOP THE SWPPP, INSTALL AND MAINTAIN BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, AND OVERSEETHE SWPPP AND CONDUCT INSPECTIONSOPERATOR·COMPLETION OF AN ACCURATE NOI WITH THE OWNER·COMPLIANCE WITH CSGP SECTIONS 3, 4, 6-22, 24 AND ANY APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY INSECTION 23 (MINN. R. 7090)·KEEPING THE PERMIT UP-TO-DATE WITH THE OWNER (PARTIAL, WHOLE, CONTRACTOR, BUILDER, ETC)·COMPLETE AND SIGN APPLICATIONS FOR PERMIT TRANSFER AND MODIFICATION AND NOTICE OF TERMINATION WITH OWNERAS NEEDED.PROJECT DESCRIPTIONTHE SITE IS APPROXIMATELY 5.60 ACRES. CONSTRUCTION WILL CONSIST OF, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO GRADING AND A FILTRATIONBASIN. THE PROPOSED PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL CONSIST OF THE CONSTRUCITON OF A MULTIFAMILY HOUSINGDEVELOPMENT WITH ASSOCIATED BUILDING, PARKING LOT AND UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE.PROJECT AREA = 5.60 ACDISTURBED AREA = 4.54 ACEXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA = 0.03 ACPROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA = 1.15 ACPRE-DEVELOPMENT SITE CONDITIONSSITE IS GENERALLY CONSISTENT WITH TYPE "D" SOILS. THE EXISTING SITE GENERALLY DRAINS FROM NORTHEAST TO THESOUTHWEST.REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT DATED XX/XX/XXXX COMPLETED BY BRAUN INTERTEC.POST-DEVELOPMENT SITE CONDITIONSTHE PROPOSED SITE MAINTAINS THE OVERALL EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS. MOST OF THE SITE DRAINS FROM NORTHEAST TOSOUTHWEST. THE RUNOFF FROM MOST OF THE SITE WILL BE DIRECTED THROUGH STORM SEWER TO THE FILTRATION BASIN.STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN·THE TEMPORARY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN WILL CONSIST OF GUIDELINES SET FORTH IN ITEMS 7 AND 8 OF THE SWPPPNOTES SECTION.·THE PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN WILL CONSIST OF SURFACE DRAINAGE BY CURB AND GUTTER, SWALESAND STORM SEWER PIPE.·THE SITE DRAINAGE WILL BE ROUTED TO PROPOSED STORM SEWER WHICH WILL DISCHARGE TO THE FILTRATION BASIN .·REFER TO THE PROJECT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION REGARDING THE PRE-DEVELOPMENTSITE CONDITIONS, POST-DEVELOPMENT SITE CONDITIONS, AND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS.·THE SITE STORM WATER DETENTION FACILITY WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO MEET OR EXCEED LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERALREQUIREMENTS.·TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S ALONG WITH THE PROCEDURES TO BE USED TOESTABLISHED ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY BMP'S AS NECESSARY FOR SITE CONDITIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE IDENTIFIEDON THE SITE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN PREPARED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROJECT, AND WITHIN THEPROJECT STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN.POTENTIAL STORM WATER POLLUTANTSPOTENTIAL POLLUTANT SOURCES, INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION AND WASTE MATERIALS THAT ARE USED OR STORED AT THE SITE, AREDESCRIBED IN THE SECTION. BY IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE BMPS, THE POTENTIAL POLLUTANT SOURCES ARE NOT REASONABLYEXPECTED TO AFFECT THE STORM WATER DISCHARGES FROM THE SITE.CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, CHEMICALS AND WASTE MATERIALS THAT WILL BE USED OR STORED AT THE SITE:CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCETHE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR SITE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IS AS FOLLOWS:1. INSTALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES (SILT FENCE, BIO-LOGS, ETC.) AND INLET PROTECTION TO EXISTING STRUCTURES ASSHOWN ON PLAN.INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCE AS SHOWN ON PLAN.2. INSTALL STABILIZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.3. CLEAR AND GRUB SITE.4. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL.5. ROUGH GRADE OF SITE.6. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES.7. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND SERVICES.8. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AROUND CATCH BASINS.9. INSTALL STREET SECTION.10. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER.11. INSTALL PAVEMENT.12. INSTALL SMALL UTILITIES (GAS, ELECTRIC, PHONE, CABLE, ETC.)13. FINE GRADE BOULEVARD, LANDSCAPE AREAS, SEED AND MULCH.14. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT.15. FINAL GRADE.16. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED BY EITHER SEED OR SOD AND LANDSCAPING,REMOVE SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL.CONSTRUCTION NOTESIT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT THE CONTRACTOR MAINTAIN A STOCKPILE OF EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND SEDIMENTCONTROL BMP'S ON SITE AT ALL TIMES FOR IMMEDIATE USAGE. IN THE EVENT OF AN ACCIDENTAL SEDIMENT DISCHARGE TOWATERS OF THE STATE, OR ANY DISCHARGE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIAL OF REPORTABLE QUANTITY, CONTACT THE MPCA STATEDUTY OFFICER AT 1-800-422-0798.TIMING OF BMP INSTALLATIONTHE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S SHALL BE INSTALLED TO MINIMIZE EROSION FROM DISTURBED SURFACESAND CAPTURE SEDIMENT ON SITE. THE FOLLOWING LIST DEFINES THE TIMING OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLMEASURES IN SPECIFIC AREAS.PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTIONTHE FOLLOWING EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE SHOWN IN THE PLANS AND SHALL BE IMPLEMENTEDPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION:1. INSTALL SILT FENCE OR OTHER SEDIMENT CONTROL AROUND THE PERIMETER OF AREAS TO BE GRADED AND ALL AREAS WHICH ARENOT TO BE DISTURBED AS SHOWN ON THE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN.2. CONSTRUCT GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AT FIELD ENTRANCES TO THE SITE AS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS.3. INLET PROTECTION IS TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL STORM WATER INLETS WHICH HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO RECEIVE STORM WATERRUNOFF FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE WITHIN 200 FEET OF LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION.4. INSTALL SILT FENCE OR OTHER SEDIMENT CONTROL AROUND ALL TEMPORARY INACTIVE STOCKPILES. ALL SILT FENCES FORSTOCKPILES SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO GRADING CONTRACT IF STOCKPILES ARE PLACED OUTSIDE OF SILT FENCES SHOWN ON THEPLAN.DURING CONSTRUCTIONTHE FOLLOWING EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE SHOWN IN THE PLANS AND SHALL BE IMPLEMENTEDDURING CONSTRUCTION:1. PHASE GRADING WORK TO MINIMIZE THE DURATION THAT ANY DISTURBED SOIL IS EXPOSED.2. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL HAVE TEMPORARY PROTECTION OR PERMANENT COVER OVER EXPOSED SOIL AREAS IF NOT BEINGACTIVELY GRADED AND/OR IF NOT AT FINAL GRADE WITHIN 7 DAYS OF DISTURBANCE ACTIVITY TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLYCEASING. TEMPORARY SEED MIX 22-111, APPLIED AT A RATE OF 30.5 LBS/ACRE, SHALL BE USED PRIOR TO WINTER, IF SITE NOTSODDED.3. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL FOR REPLACEMENT OF 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL OVER TURF AREAS WHEN GRADING IS COMPLETE.4. PLACE A MINIMUM OF 2 TONS/ACRE OF STRAW ON ALL AREAS AFTER REACHING FINAL GRADE WITH TOPSOIL AND ANCHORSTRAW WITH EITHER A STRAIGHT DISK, HYDROMULCH OR POLYMER.5. STABILIZATION OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES THAT DRAIN WATER FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE MUST BEINITIATED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTING THE DRAINAGE DITCH TO ANY CONVEYANCE SYSTEM THAT DISCHARGES TOSURFACE WATERS. THE FIRST 200 LINEAR FEET MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS. THE REMAINING DITCH SHALL BE STABILIZEDWITHIN 7 DAYS.6. INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND ALL TEMPORARY INACTIVE STOCKPILES WHICH ARE NOT PLACED WITHIN EXISTING SILT FENCES OROTHER PERIMETER CONTROLS.7. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION AT PIPE APRON OUTLETS WILL BE PLACED PRIOR TO BUT NO SOONER THAN 7DAYS BEFORE APRON IS INSTALLED. RIPRAP SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDER APRON LIP ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD DETAIL.8. SUFFICIENT PERSONNEL, EQUIPMENT, AND MATERIALS SHALL BE MOBILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A WRITTEN ORDER BY THEOWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE TO CONDUCT CORRECTIVE WORK AND INSTALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL WORK INTHE CASE OF AN EMERGENCY.9. REMOVE ANY SEDIMENT THAT HAS BEEN TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC STREETS AT THE END OF THE DAY OR WITHIN 24 HOURS OFDETECTION, OR MORE FREQUENT AT DIRECTION OF SITE INSPECTOR.10. COLLECT ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS IN DUMPSTERS AND ROLL-OFF BOXES, EMPTY WHEN DEBRIS REACHES TOP OF DUMPSTER11. INSPECT POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES AS SPECIFIED WITHIN SECTION 11 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT.INLET SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP REMOVALIF INLET SEDIMENT CONTROLS (WIMCO TYPE OR EQUAL) BMP'S ARE REMOVED FOR FLOODING / FREEZING CONCERNS UPONREQUEST OF THE MUNICIPALITY, WATERSHED DISTRICT OR OTHER AGENCY, DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THEINSPECTION REPORTS AND THIS SWPPP OR BEAVAILABLE WITHIN 72 HOURS OF REQUEST. DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE A WRITTEN FORM OF CORRESPONDENCE VERIFYING THENEED FOR REMOVAL.UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIESPERMIT TERMINATION CONDITIONS ARE ACHIEVED FOR THE PROJECT WHEN PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL BMP'S ARE APPLIED TOTHE SITE. THE PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL BMP'S MAY BE A COMBINED OF VEGETATIVE AND NON-VEGETATIVE COVER TYPES.ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS TO ACHIEVING FINAL STABILIZATION PERMIT TERMINATION CONDITIONS INCLUDE:1. ALL SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. ALL DISTURBED AREA WITHOUT PERMANENT IMPERMEABLE SURFACES AREVEGETATED FOR FINAL STABILIZATION.2. PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM (IF REQUIRED) IS CONSTRUCTED AND ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT HAS BEENREMOVED FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. CLEAN OUT ALL SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCES AND FROM TEMPORARY SEDIMENTBASINS THAT ARE TO BE USED AS PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BASINS. THE CLEAN OUT OF PERMANENT BASINS MUSTBE SUFFICIENT TO RETURN THE BASIN TO DESIGN CAPACITY.3. THE VEGETATIVE COVER FOR THE SITE IS AT A DENSITY, WITH UNIFORM PERENNIAL COVER OF 70% OF THE EXPECTED FINALGROWTH DENSITY.4. ALL TEMPORARY, SYNTHETIC BMP'S HAVE BEEN REMOVED.PERMANENT VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENTPERMANENT TURF SHALL FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATIONS PER NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS IN THE GRADING AND/OR LANDSCAPEPLAN. SEED THAT IS TO OCCUR AFTER OCTOBER 20TH SHALL CONFORM TO THE MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS FOR DORMANT SEEDING.SWPPP INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL INSPECTIONSCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND ALL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES MUST BE INSPECTED (USING MPCA CONSTRUCTION STORMWATERINSPECTION CHECKLIST OR AN ALTERNATIVE FORM) WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE SCHEDULE BELOW. THE INSPECTOR SHALL BEA PERSON TRAINED AND FAMILIAR WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SWPPP AND THE MPCA MN R100001 PERMIT. ALTERNATES WILLINCLUDE INDIVIDUALS TO BE DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER AND MAY INCLUDE CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL OR OTHER QUALIFIEDINDIVIDUALS AND SHALL BE LISTED IN THE PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATION SECTION OF THIS PLANINSPECTION SCHEDULE:- IF THE SITE IS ACTIVE: INSPECTION NEEDED ONCE EVERY 7 CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A RAINFALL GREATER THAT0.5 INCHES.- INACTIVE AND STABILIZED AREAS: INSPECTION NEEDED ONCE EVERY 30 CALENDAR DAYS.- INACTIVE AREAS WITH FINAL STABILIZATION: INSPECTION NEEDED ONCE EVERY MONTH FOR 12 MONTHS (NOT INCLUDING FROZENCONDITIONS).- SUBJECT TO WINTER/FROZEN CONDITIONS: NOT APPLICABLE/NOT NEEDED IF NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS OCCURRING.SCOPE OF INSPECTION SHALL INCLUDE:1. RECORD DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTION2. NAME OF PERSON(S) CONDUCTING INSPECTION3. FINDINGS OF THE INSPECTION4. LOCATION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS NEEDED5. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (DATE.TIME/BY WHOM)6. DATE AND AMOUNT OF RAINFALL (RAINFALL AMOUNTS TO BE TAKEN FROM AN ONSITE RAIN GAUGE)7. OBSERVED DISCHARGES LOCATIONS8. DESCRIBE DISCHARGE (COLOR, ODOR, FLOATING. SETTLED, SOLIDS, FOAM, OIL SHEEN)9. THE SITE INSPECTOR WILL VISUALLY CHECK A DISCHARGE FROM A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASIN TO ENSUREADEQUATE TREATMENT IS OBTAINED AND DISCHARGE WATER WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE EXCESSIVE SEDIMENT OR OTHER NUISANCECONDITIONS.10. RECORD CHANGES MADE TO THE SWPPP. AMENDMENTS FROM INSPECTIONS NEED TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN 7 DAYS.11. ALL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE DOCUMENTED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER COMPLETING THE FIELD INSPECTION AND AVAILABLE IN PAPEROR ELECTRONIC FORM ON SITE.MAINTENANCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICESTHE OWNER/CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT WATER QUALITYMANAGEMENT BMPS AS WELL AS ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS, FOR THE DURATION OF THECONSTRUCTION WORK AT THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST INSPECT ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPSAND POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE INTEGRITY AND EFFECTIVENESS DURING ALL ROUTINE AND POSTRAINFALL EVENTS. ALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS MUST BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, OR SUPPLEMENTED WITH FUNCTIONAL BMPS BY THEEND OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY, OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS UNLESS ANOTHER TIMEFRAME IS SPECIFIED BELOW.THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES WILL BE USED TO DETERMINE IF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES REQUIREMAINTENANCE, REPAIR, OR REPLACEMENT:1. ALL NON-FUNCTIONAL BMPS - OBSERVED CONDITION; SEDIMENT OVERTOPPING, UNDER WATER, SCOURED ENDS, UNDERMINED,DESTROYED, NON-FUNCTION AS DESIGNED, ETC. - SHALL BE MAINTAINED OR REPLACED BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAYAFTER DISCOVERY OR NOTIFICATION, OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW.2. PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL (SILT FENCE, FIBER LOGS, BERMS, ETC.) - OBSERVED CONDITION TO BE 1/2 FULL OF SEDIMENT,FLATTENED TO 12 HEIGHT, DRIVEN OVER, UNDERMINED, SCOURED, MOVED FOR ACCESS, ETC. - SHALL BE MAINTAINED, REPAIRED ORSUPPLEMENTATION OF PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL SHOULD BE DONE BY THE END OF NEXT BUSINESS DAY OR AD FIELDCONDITIONS ALLOW.3. INLET PROTECTION BMPS, CONVEYANCES, SURFACE WATERS - OBSERVED CONDITION; SEDIMENT DEPOSITION, SEDIMENT DELTASAN ACCUMULATION OF SEDIMENT MATERIAL, DEVICES APPEAR PLUGGED WITH SEDIMENT - REMOVAL/CLEAN OUT OFACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DELTAS TO BE REMOVED WITHIN 7 DAYS, STABILIZE AS NEEDED IF SOILS ARE EXPOSED DURINGREMOVAL/CLEAN OUT.4. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS AND TRAPS/PERMANENT SEDIMENT BASINS - OBSERVED TO HAVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITION ANDACCUMULATION TO 1/2 OF THE STORAGE VOLUME - CLEAN OUT, REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT MATERIAL WITHIN 7 DAYS OFOBSERVATION, OR AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS.5. SITE EXIT LOCATIONS, ROCK EXIT PADS, OTHER ANTI-TRACKING PRACTICES - OBSERVED TO HAVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT INROCK OR OTHER ANTI-TRACKING BMP, TRACKING OF SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE ONTO PAVED SURFACES - TOP DRESS ROCK,MAINTAIN ROCK EXIT OR OTHER ANTI-TRACKING CONTROLS, SCRAP PAVED SURFACES, SWEEP PAVED SURFACES WITHIN 1CALENDAR DAY OF DISCOVERY.6. PAVED SURFACES AND ADJACENT STREETS - OBSERVED TO BE TRACKED WITH SEDIMENT AND SOIL MATERIAL FRO THE SITEHAULING OR ACCESS -SWEEP WITHIN 1 CALENDAR DAY OF DISCOVERY, ADDITIONAL AND/OR MORE FREQUENT SWEEPING MAY BENEEDED TO MAINTAIN PUBLIC SAFETYOR PREVENT WASHING FROM FORECASTED RAINS.7. STREET SWEEPING IS REQUIRED ONE TIME PER WEEK AND AFTER RAINFALL OR MORE FREQUENTLY IF DIRECTED BY CITY ENGINEER.TERMINATION OF COVERAGETHE PROJECT PERMIT MAY BE TERMINATED IN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING SCENARIOS:1. ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE, TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC BMP'S ARE REMOVED, ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROMCONSTRUCTION IS REMOVED, AND PERMANENT COVER HAS BEEN ACHIEVED WITH VEGETATIVE AND/OR NON-VEGETATIVE COVER.THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION FORM FROM THE PCA SHOULD BE COMPLETED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF MEETING THE CONDITIONS ABOVE.UPON MIDNIGHT OF THE POST MARKED DATE, THE PERMIT COVERAGE IS TERMINATED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTIFIED BY THE MPCA.OR:2. WITHIN 30 DAYS OF SELLING OR OTHERWISE LEGALLY TRANSFERRING OWNERSHIP OF THE SITE IN IT'S ENTIRETY (INCLUDING STREETSWEEPING AND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE) FROM THE ORIGINAL OWNER TO ANOTHER PARTY TAKING RESPONSIBILITY OFOWNERSHIP. THE TERMINATION IS EFFECTIVE UPON MIDNIGHT OF THE SUBMISSION DATE OF THE NOT. IF A PORTION OF THE SITE ISTRANSFERRED (I.E. OUTLOTS,LOTS/BLOCKS) THAT PORTION OF THE SITE IS TERMINATED FROM THE ORIGINAL PERMIT COVERAGE ATMIDNIGHT OF THE SUBMISSION DATE. OR:3. PERMIT COVERAGE CAN BE TERMINATED IF ALL OF THE FOLLOWING ARE MET:3.a. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED FOR 90 DAYS; AND3.b. AT LEAST 90% OF THE AREA OF THE ORIGINALLY PROPOSED ACTIVITY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND PERMANENTLY ESTABLISHEDWITH VEGETATION OR NON-VEGETATIVE COVER; AND3.c. WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE, PERMANENT COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED; AND3.d. THE SITE IS COMPLIANT WITH PERMIT SECTIONS 13.3 THROUGH 13.7.4. WHERE THE PROJECT OBTAINED PERMIT COVERAGE BUT NEVER STARTED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY DUE TO CANCELLATION OROTHER REASONS, DOCUMENTATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE MPCA WITH THE NOT FORM AND IS SUBJECT TO MPCA APPROVAL.POTENTIAL POLLUTANTLOCATIONCONTROL MEASUREANTIFREEZEVARIOUSSECONDARY CONTAINMENT/DRIP PANDIESEL FUELVARIOUSSECONDARY CONTAINMENT/DRIP PANFERTILIZERLANDSCAPE CONTRACTORSECONDARY CONTAINMENTGASOLINEIN EQUIPMENT/FUELING AREASECONDARY CONTAINMENT/DRIP PANGLUE/ADHESIVESCONTRACTORSECONDARY CONTAINMENTHYDRAULIC OILCONTRACTORSECONDARY CONTAINMENTPAINTSCONTRACTORSECONDARY CONTAINMENTGREASECONTRACTORSECONDARY CONTAINMENT/DRIP PANSANITARY WASTEPORTABLE BATHROOMSSERVICE PROVIDER TO SECURE UNITS FROM TIPPINGSOIL AMENDMENTSLANDSCAPE CONTRACTORSECONDARY CONTAINMENTCONCRETETRUCK WASHOUTWASHOUT AREACONCRETE/MORTARMOBILE MIXERS.C / WASHOUT AREASWPPP BMP QUANTITIESSILT FENCE 1,721 LFBIO-ROLL 60 LFINLET PROTECTION 6 EACHCULVERT/ FES PROTECTION 3 EACHTEMPORARY SEED MIX (22-111) AS NEEDEDPERMANENT SEED MIX 81,067 SFSOD 18,473 SFEROSION CONTROL BLANKET 4,021 SFROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1 EACHSTREET SWEEPING1 EACH314 DescriptionRev.DateMINNEWASHTA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA07.11.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-102PMJM06/13/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Minnewashta MF\CAD\Sheets\SWPPP NARRATIVE & NOTES.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC7.1SWPPP NOTESLISTED BELOW ARE ADDITIONAL BMP'S THAT MAY BE CONSIDERED FOR USE IF THE BMP'S IDENTIFIED IN THEEROSION CONTROL PLANS PROVE TO BE INSUFFICIENT. PAYMENT FOR THESE BMP'S MAY ONLY BE MADE IFPRIOR APPROVAL FROMAN OWNER HAS BEEN GIVEN.1.IMPORTANT VEGETATION·SAFETY FENCE OR A SIMILAR METHOD OF PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED TO PROTECT IMPORTANTVEGETATION AND PROHIBIT VEHICULAR TRAFFIC.·A SECONDARY SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT FIELD OFFICES, STORED EQUIPMENT (INCLUDINGVEHICLE PARKING), CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL LOCATIONS, AND TOPSOIL OR FILL STOCKPILESINSTALLED WITHIN A 25-FOOT MINIMUM BUFFER OUTSIDE THE DRIP LINE OF TREES.2.DITCH PROTECTION (TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT)·THE LAST 200 FEET OF ANY DITCH CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER SHALL HAVE TEMPORARY ORPERMANENT STABILIZATION MEASURES IN PLACE WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DIRECT CONNECTION TO ASURFACE WATER. DITCHES MAY BE KEPT IN A "SMOOTH" ROUGH GRADED CONDITION IN ORDER TOPROPERLY INSTALL EROSION CONTROL SEEDING, MULCH, MATS AND BLANKETS.·STABILIZATION METHODS FOR DITCH BOTTOM WETTED PERIMETER MAY INCLUDE ONE OF THEFOLLOWING OR COMBINATIONS OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, MATS, RIP-RAP, BIO-ROLLS OR ROCKCHECK DAMS. THE METHOD CHOSEN WILL BE BASED ON AN ANALYSIS OF THE SLOPE AND VELOCITYOF THE RUNOFF. THESE ARE ADDITIONAL BMP'S WHICH MAY BE CONSIDERED FOR USE IF THE BMP'SIDENTIFIED IN THE EROSION CONTROL PLANS PROVE TO BE INSUFFICIENT. PAYMENT FOR THESE BMP'SMAY ONLY BE MADE IF PRIOR APPROVAL FROM AN OWNER HAS BEEN GIVEN.·WHERE DITCH GRADES EXCEED 5%, ROCK CHECK DAMS OR EQUIVALENT BMP SHALL BE INSTALLED.CHECK DAMS TO BE SPACED SO THAT THE CREST OF THE DOWNSTREAM DAM IS AT THE ELEVATION OFTHE TOE OF THE UPSTREAM DAM. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED DUE TOCONTRACTORS METHOD OF SEQUENCING THEIR CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THEGRADING CONTRACT.·ABOVE THE WETTED PERIMETER, THE DITCH WILL BE STABILIZED BY SEEDING AND MULCH AND/OREROSION CONTROL BLANKETS DEPENDING ON SIDE SLOPE STEEPNESS AND LENGTH.·ALL DITCHES WILL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 14 DAYS.3. WORK NEXT TO WETLANDS·PRESERVE A 100' FROM SPECIAL WATERS) NATURAL BUFFER, OR IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE, PROVIDEREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TO DISTURBANCE OF UP-GRADIENT AREAS.·FILL SLOPES ADJACENT TO WETLANDS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED WITHIN 7 DAYS OFCOMPLETION OF WORK. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AS INDICATED ON THE EROSIONCONTROL / GRADING PLAN.4. LONG-STEEP CUT/FILL SLOPES·THERE WILL BE NO UNBROKEN SURFACE SLOPE LENGTHS OF GREATER THAN 75 FEET FOR SLOPES WITHA GRADE OF 3:1 OR STEEPER WITHIN 200 FEET OF SURFACE WATERS. ALL EXPOSED AREAS WITH ACONTINUOUS POSITIVE SLOPE WITHIN 200 FEET OF A SURFACE WATER WILL HAVE A TEMPORARY ORPERMANENT COVER YEAR ROUND. THE EXPOSED SOILS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 14 DAYS·PLANNED SLOPES OF 3:1 (H:V) OR STEEPER AND GREATER THAN 75 FT IN LENGTH WILL BE TEMPORARILYOR PERMANENTLY STABILIZED IN INCREMENTS NOT TO EXCEED 75 FT, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ORDISTURBING A NEW INCREMENT.·LONG SLOPES SHOULD BE BROKEN INTO SHORTER LENGTHS BY INSTALLING STRAW BIOROLLS ININTERLOCKING HERRINGBONES AS SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN. IF TEMPORARY SEEDING ANDMULCH CAN NOT BE USED ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1, THEN THE SLOPE MAY BE COVERED WITHTARPS OR PLASTIC SHEETING. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED DUE TOCONTRACTORS METHOD OF SEQUENCING THEIR CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THEGRADING CONTRACT.·THE SOIL SURFACE ON RE-VEGETATED SLOPES WILL BE ROUGHENED USING ANY APPROPRIATEIMPLEMENT THAT CAN BE SAFELY OPERATED ON THE SLOPE, SUCH AS BULLDOZERS OR DISKS. THEGROOVES SHALL BE CREATED PERPENDICULAR TO THE SLOPE TO HELP ESTABLISH VEGETATIVE COVER,REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITY, INCREASE INFILTRATION, AND PROVIDE FOR SEDIMENT TRAPPING.5.CULVERT INLET/OUTLET PROTECTION·SOD MAY BE PLACED AND ANCHORED AT CULVERT INLETS AS SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN, UNLESSVELOCITIES REQUIRE RIPRAP.·AT LEAST ONE 2-FOOT WIDE STRIP OF SOD OR FIBER BLANKET SHALL BE PLACED ALONG THE EDGES OFCULVERT HEADWALLS AND WINGWALLS AS SHOWN ON THE GRADING AND/OR UTILITY PLANS.·RIPRAP AT PIPE APRON OUTLETS WILL BE PLACED PRIOR TO BUT NO SOONER THAN 7 DAYS BEFOREAPRON IS INSTALLED. RIPRAP SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDER APRON LIP ACCORDING TO THE STANDARDDETAIL.6.STORM SEWER INLET PROTECTION·STORM DRAIN INLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED UNTIL THE DISTURBED AREAS THAT COULD DISCHARGE TOAN INLET HAVE BEEN STABILIZED.·INFRASAFE SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIERS OR APPROVED EQUAL SHALL BE USED WHEN CASTINGS ARENOT IN PLACE AS INDICATED ON THE UTILITY PLAN AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER.·INFRASAFE DEBRIS COLLECTION DEVICE OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT SHALL BE USED WHEN CASTINGSARE IN PLACE AS INDICATED ON THE UTILITY PLAN AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER.·DOCUMENTATION IS NEEDED WITHIN 72 HOURS IF REMOVAL OF PROTECTION BMPS IS NEEDED DUE TOWINTER CONDITIONS OR FLOODING CONCERNS.7.STORM WATER POND OUTLETS·TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION MEASURES SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE STORMWATER POND OUTLETS WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DIRECT CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER.·RIPRAP AT PIPE APRON OUTLETS WILL BE PLACED PRIOR TO APRON INSTALLATION AND SHALL BEINSTALLED UNDER THE APRON LIP.·POND EMERGENCY SPILLWAYS SHALL BE LINED BASED ON THE DESIGN DISCHARGE FLOW VELOCITYAND AS INDICATED ON GRADING AND/OR UTILITY PLANS.8.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS·TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS WILL BE PROVIDED WHERE 10 OR MORE ACRES OF DISTURBED SOILDRAIN TO ACOMMON LOCATION. THE BASIN SIZE IS BASED ON RUNOFF FROM A 2-YEAR, 24 HOURSTORM, FOR EACH ACRE DRAINED TO THE BASIN. AT A MINIMUM, THE BASIN WILL PROVIDE 1800 CUBICFEET OF STORAGE FOR EACH ACRE DRAINED TO THE BASIN.·SEDIMENT BASINS WILL DETAIN WATER LONG ENOUGH TO SETTLE OUT AT LEAST 75 PERCENT OF THESEDIMENT. THE USE OF FLOCS MAY BE NECESSARY. THE DISCHARGE QUALITY SHALL BE EQUAL TO ORBETTER THAN THE RECEIVING WATER. THE TEMPORARY BASIN MAY BE DRAWN DOWN WITH A PUMP TOINCREASE CAPACITY FOR THE NEXT RAIN EVENT. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES REQUIREDDUE TO CONTRACTORS METHOD OF SEQUENCING THEIR CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTALTO THE GRADING CONTRACT.·THE SEDIMENT PONDS WILL BE EXCAVATED TO MAINTAIN THE NECESSARY SEDIMENT CAPACITY ANDCONTAINMENT.··TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FOREBAYS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO CAPTURE SEDIMENT BEFORE IT ENTERSTHE POND, IF·NECESSARY.·THE SEDIMENT PONDS WILL BE MONITORED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE THE SEDIMENT LEVELIN THE POND.·WHEN THE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE TEMPORARY BASIN REACHES ½ FULL (50% OF THESTORAGE VOLUME) THE BASIN SHALL BE DRAINED USING PUMPS AND ENERGY DISSIPATION ANDSEDIMENT REMOVAL SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 72 HOURS OF DISCOVERY OF THE BASIN BEING 1/2FULL OF SEDIMENT, OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS. TEMPORARY EROSIONCONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED DUE TO CONTRACTORS METHOD OF SEQUENCING THEIRCONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT.·TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS WILL HAVE A STABILIZED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW AND CONTAINENERGY DISSIPATION AT BASIN OUTLET.9.DEEP UTILITIES: WATER AND SANITARY/GAS LINE·SILT FENCE OR A SIMILAR TYPE OF PERIMETER CONTROL SHALL BE PLACED DOWN GRADIENT OF THEEXCAVATED SOIL IF WORK IS DONE WITHIN 200 FEET OF WETLANDS OR STREAMS.·DISTURBANCE OF CHANNEL BANKS, WETLANDS, AND IMPORTANT VEGETATION AREAS SHALL BEMINIMIZED TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE.·THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SITE SHALL BE SEEDED WITH A TEMPORARY·SEED MIX AND MULCH AFTER INSTALLATION IF THE SITE WILL BE IDLE FOR 7, 14, OR 21 DAYS DEPENDINGUPON SLOPES OF STEEPER THAN 3:1, 3:1 TO 10:1 AND FLATTER THAN 10:1 RESPECTIVELY.10.STOCKPILES (TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT)·LOCATE STOCKPILES A MINIMUM OF 100 FEET FROM CATCH BASIN INLETS, PONDS, AND SITE DRAINAGEROUTES PERIMETER CONTROLS SUCH AS SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND ALL STOCKPILES IFNOT PLACED WITHIN EXISTING SILT FENCES OR OTHER SEDIMENT CONTROL.·TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH SHALL BE USED TO STABILIZE THE STOCKPILES AND THE STOCKPILESSHALL BE SHAPED TO FACILITATE SEEDING AND MINIMIZE EROSION AND SHALL BE SEEDED WITHIN 7DAYS. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED DUE TO CONTRACTORS METHOD OFSEQUENCING THEIR CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT.·IF TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH CANNOT BE USED, THEN THE STOCKPILES SHALL BE COVERED WITHHYDROMULCH, TARPS OR PLASTIC SHEETING AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER.·IF STOCKPILES MUST BE PLACED WITHIN A CONVEYANCE A TEMPORARY BYPASS SHALL BE INSTALLED(I.E. PVC PIPE) TO ADEQUATELY CONVEY RUNOFF. TEMPORARY BYPASS BMPS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TOTHE CONTRACT UNLESS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY THE OWNER / ENGINEER11.CONSTRUCTION DEWATERING·DURING DEWATERING ACTIVITIES, THE SEDIMENT LADEN WATER CANNOT BE DIRECTLY DISCHARGED TOSURFACE WATERS. OPTIONS FOR REDUCING THE TURBIDITY OF THE WATER INCLUDE:(TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED DUE TO CONTRACTORS METHOD OFSEQUENCING THEIR CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT):1.CONSTRUCT A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP FOR TURBID WATER DISCHARGE.2.USE A PORTABLE SEDIMENT TRAP SYSTEM.3.APPLY NATURAL BASED FLOCCULENT TECHNOLOGY SUCH AS CHITOSAN IN SEDIMENT TRAPS OR ASERIES OF DITCH CHECKS TO CONTAIN SEDIMENT.4.DISCHARGE THROUGH FIBERLOGS OR A ROCK WEEPER INTO A LARGE VEGETATIVE BUFFER AREA.5.PUMP TO A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN.6.ENERGY DISSIPATION WILL BE PROVIDED AT ALL DISCHARGE POINTS.7.DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING ACTIVITIES WILL NOT CAUSE EROSION IN RECEIVING CHANNELS ORADVERSELY IMPACT WETLANDS.8.ALL EROSION CONTROL OR SEDIMENT TRAPS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION DEWATERING SHALL BECONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIRING DEWATERING.12.CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES·A TEMPORARY CRUSHED ROCK OR WOOD CHIP PAD SHALL BE LOCATED WHERE VEHICLES LEAVE THECONSTRUCTION SITE.·THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PAD SHALL BE AT LEAST 50 FEET IN LENGTH.·GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MAY BE PLACED UNDER THE CRUSHED ROCK OR WOOD CHIPS TO PREVENTMIGRATION OF MUD FROM UNDERLYING SOIL INTO THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MATERIAL.·ROCK PADS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF ROCK 1 TO 3 INCHES IN SIZE AND PLACED IN 6 INCH LAYERS.·CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSPECTED AT LEAST EVERY 7 DAYS AND MAINTAINED ASNEEDED.·TRACKED SEDIMENTS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM PAVED SURFACES AT THE END OF EACH DAY USINGPICK-UP TYPE STREET SWEEPER.·IF TRACKING INTO ROADWAY BECOMES PROBLEMATIC THE ENTRANCE PADS SHALL BE LENGTHENED ORANOTHER TECHNIQUE APPLIED. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED DUE TOCONTRACTORS METHOD OF SEQUENCING THEIR CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THEGRADING CONTRACT.·THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE MONITORED CLOSELY DURING WET CONDITIONS. IFTRACKING INTO ADJACENT ROADWAYS OCCURS, THE FREQUENCY OF STREET SWEEPING SHALL BEINCREASED.13.CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT·CONCRETE TRUCKS SHALL UTILIZE THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA SHOWN ON THE PLANS TO WASHAND RINSE THEIR EQUIPMENT PRIOR TO LEAVING THE SITE.·WASHOUT OF CONCRETE MIXER TRUCKS WILL BE PERFORMED IN THE DESIGNATED AREAS ONLY.·WASHOUTS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT CONTAINMENT FOR ALLLIQUID AND CONCRETE WASTE GENERATED BY WASHOUT OPERATIONS.·WASHOUTS SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED ON SITE WITH SIGNAGE BY THE UTILITY CONTRACTOR WITHAPPROVAL FROM OWNER.·WASHOUTS SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 50 FEET FROM DRAINAGE FACILITIES ANDWATERCOURSES.·CONCRETE WASHOUT AREAS WILL HAVE AN IMPERMEABLE LINER TO PREVENT CONCRETE WASHOUTWATER FROM INFILTRATING/CONTACTING WITH SOIL.·IMPERMEABLE LINER INCLUDES 10 MIL POLYLINER OR COMPACTED CLAY LINER.·WASHOUT SYSTEMS CAN BE USED AS ALTERNATE WASHOUT AREAS.14.VEHICLE MAINTENANCE·ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OF VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL OCCUR IN STAGING AREAS ONLY.·VEHICLE WASHING SHOULD BE AVOIDED. IF WASHING IS NECESSARY, RUNOFF FROM THE WASHINGWILL BE CONTAINED AND LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. RUNOFF MUST BE CONTAINED ANDWASTE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF·ENGINE DEGREASING SHALL BE AVOIDED. IF DEGREASING IS NECESSARY, RUNOFF FROM THEOPERATION WILL BE CONTAINED IN A LINED SEDIMENT TRAP AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF AT ATREATMENT FACILITY.·ALL REQUIRED SEDIMENT TRAPS AND CONTAINMENT FACILITIES AND PROPER DISPOSAL OF WASHWATER/DEGREASING AT A TREATMENT FACILITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTIONCONTRACT.15.FUELING·ANY FUEL TANK OR TRUCK STORED ON THE PROJECT SITE SHALL BE PROTECTED BY A SECONDARYCONTAINMENT SYSTEM.·FUELING AREAS SHALL NOT BE WASHED OR RINSED WITH WATER SINCE THIS COULD CAUSE FUEL SPILLSTO BE DISCHARGED INTO STORM WATER SYSTEMS.·ABSORBENT MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON SITE FOR USE IN CLEANING UP SMALL SPILLS.·ALL REQUIRED FUEL CONTAINMENT AND CLEAN-UP MATERIALS AND THE PROPER DISPOSAL OF THEMATERIALS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT.16.HAZARDOUS MATERIALS·HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SHALL BE PROPERLY STORED TO PREVENT VANDALISM OR UNAUTHORIZEDACCESS.·CONTAINMENT UNITS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCALREGULATIONS.·MPCA STORING AND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE FOLLOWED FOR ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE.·NO HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SHOULD BE STORED WITHIN 200 FEET OF AN IDENTIFIED CRITICAL AREA.·ABSORBENT MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE FROM THE CONTRACTOR ON SITE FOR USE IN CLEANINGUP SMALL SPILLS.·IF BUILDING MATERIALS, CHEMICALS, OR GENERAL REFUSE IS BEING USED, STORED, DISPOSED OF, OROTHERWISE MANAGED INAPPROPRIATELY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CORRECT SUCH DEFECTS WITHIN24 HOURS OF DETECTION OR NOTIFICATION.·ALL REQUIRED CONTAINMENT / STORAGE UNITS / ABSORBENT MATERIAL AND REQUIRED DISPOSALSHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT.17.CHEMICAL CONTAINMENT·GASOLINE, OIL, PAINT, SOLVENTS, AND OTHER CHEMICALS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION ARE NOTALLOWED TO CONTACT THE GROUND SURFACE, BE EXPOSED TO GROUNDWATER OR BE RELEASED TOA SURFACE OR GROUNDWATER EXCEPT IN DE MINIMIS QUANTITIES.·ALL PRODUCTS SHALL BE KEPT IN THEIR ORIGINAL CONTAINER, WITH ORIGINAL LABELS STILL ATTACHED,UNLESS THE CONTAINER IS NOT RESEALABLE.·HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STORAGE AREA AT THEEND OF EACH DAY.·AN EFFORT SHOULD BE MADE TO STORE ONLY ENOUGH PRODUCTS TO DO THE REQUIRED JOB.·THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TANKS OR BARRELS TO COLLECT LIQUID BYPRODUCTS THAT POSE APOLLUTION HAZARD.·THE POLLUTANTS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE ON A WEEKLY BASIS AND DISPOSED OF INACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.·ALL SPILLS SHALL BE CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY AFTER DISCOVERY, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEMANUFACTURE'S RECOMMENDED METHODS.·ALL REQUIRED CONTAINMENT / STORAGE UNITS / ABSORBENT MATERIAL AND REQUIRED DISPOSALSHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT·ALL STORAGE AREAS SHALL BE SECURED TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS.18.SOLID WASTE·SOLID WASTE SHALL BE STORED IN APPROPRIATE CONTAINERS AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF ON AREGULAR BASIS.·CONTAINERS SHALL BE COVERED TO PREVENT WIND BLOWING THE WASTE AROUND THE SITE.·MPCA DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS WILL BE FOLLOWED FOR ALL SOLID WASTE.·SOLID WASTE STORAGE CONTAINERS AND PROPER DISPOSAL SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TOTHE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT.19.DUST CONTROL·THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE A VARIETY OF DUST CONTROL INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THEFOLLOWING:·RAPID STABILIZATION METHODS ON SLOPES·WATER ON ROADWAYS AND GRADED AREAS·ALTERNATIVES: IN THE FORM OF VEGETABLE POLYMERS, WATER AND CALCIUM CHLORIDE PETROLEUMEMULSION RESINS, OR ACRYLIC COPOLYMERS MAY ALSO BE USED.·ALL REQUIRED DUST CONTROL SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AS PERSPECIFICATIONS.20.WINTER STABILIZATION·COVER EXPOSED SOILS ON OR AROUND NOV. 15TH AND/OR PRIOR TO TERMINATION OFCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES FOR WINTER·ALL EXPOSED SOILS TO BE COVERED WITH 2 TONS TYPE 1 MULCH·ALL EXPOSED SOILS TO BE SEEDED WITH MNDOT SEED MIX 150·ALL LOW POINTS IN ROADS TO BE ADEQUATELY DRAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NPDES DEWATERINGREQUIREMENTS PART IV. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS. SECTION D. DEWATERING ANDBASIN DRAINING.·PERIMETER SILT FENCE OR OTHER CONTROLS TO BE INSTALLED 3-5 FEET FROM THE BACK OF THE CURBAND OUT OF THE PLOWED SNOW AREA.·PERIMETER CONTROLS AROUND PERMANENT STORMWATER BASINS TO BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED·INLET CONTROLS TO BE REMOVED ACCORDING TO LEGAL REQUIREMENTS WITH DOCUMENTATIONWITHIN 72 HOURS FROM LEGAL AUTHORITY.·IF WORK HAS OCCURRED NEAR OR IN STREAMS OR OTHER SURFACE WATERS, THE EXPOSED SOILSSHALL BE STABILIZED TO PROTECT AGAINST FLOODING AND SPRING RUNOFF TO THE 100-YR FLOODELEVATION.·ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATER BASINS AND SEDIMENT BASINS SHOULD HAVEOUTLETS AND STABILIZED EMERGENCY OVERFLOWS INSTALLED AS PER THE GRADING AND/OR UTILITYPLAN AND AT THE APPROVAL OF THE OWNER.21.NON-STORMWATER DEWATERING·HYDRANT FLUSHING: FLUSHING OF HYDRANTS WILL BE DISCHARGED·THROUGH TEMPORARY PIPES AS NECESSARY, ONTO IMPERVIOUS SURFACES OR TO STABILIZED ARESWITH ENERGY DISSIPATION AT THE DISCHARGE POINT. THE DISCHARGE SHOULD BE COLLECTED BY THESTORM WATER BASINS AND STORM SEWER SYSTEM.·POTABLE WATER DISCHARGE: ALL WATER LINES WILL BE FLUSHED USING HOSES AND DISCHARGEDONTO AN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AND DIRECTED TO THE STORM SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE BYNON-EROSIVE MEANS.22.WORK NEAR OR IN IMPAIRED WATERS·EXPOSED SOILS MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF ACTIVITY TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLYCEASED.·TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN NEEDED WITHIN AREAS 5 ACRE DISTURBANCE WITH COMMON POINT OFDISCHARGE.·IF WORK IS NEAR SPECIAL WATERS REFER TO APPENDIX A OF THE NPDES PERMIT FOR ADDITIONALNOTES AND REQUIREMENTS.·NO UNTREATED DEWATERING WILL TAKE PLACE AND DISCHARGE TO "IMPAIRED WATERS"·SEE PERMIT FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS23.INFILTRATION/FILTRATION AREAS·FENCE OFF AREA PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.·EXCAVATION AREA SHALL TAKE PLACE AFTER CONTRIBUTING AREAS ARE AT FINAL GRADE ANDSTABILIZED.·DO NOT USE HEAVY/WHEELED EQUIPMENT IN FILTRATION AREA.·DIVERSIONS, REDUNDANT SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROLS MUST BE USED TO PROTECT AREA.·ENSURE 8 FT MAINTENANCE ACCESS IS ADEQUATE FOR AREA.·IF GRADING MUST OCCUR IN FILTRATION AREA, LEAVE GRADE 3 FT HIGH TEMPORARILY UNTIL AREA CANBE FINAL GRADED AND STABILIZED315 DescriptionRev.DateMINNEWASHTA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA07.11.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-102PMJM06/13/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Minnewashta MF\CAD\Sheets\CIVIL DETAILS.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC8.0CIVIL DETAILS -UTILITY DETAILS1C8.02C8.03C8.04C8.05C8.06C8.0316 DescriptionRev.DateMINNEWASHTA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA07.11.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-102PMJM06/13/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Minnewashta MF\CAD\Sheets\CIVIL DETAILS.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC8.1CIVIL DETAILS -STORM SEWERDETAILSREVE7001-110-042DWG NO.1 OF 1SHEET1:40SCALEDWG SIZEA3130 VERONA AVEBUFORD, GA 30518PHN (770) 932-2443FAX (770) 932-2490www.nyloplast-us.com8 IN - 36 IN TYPICAL INSTALLATION OPTIONSTITLEPROJECT NO./NAMEMATERIALDATEREVISED BY8-10-00DATEAWADRAWN BYTHIS PRINT DISCLOSES SUBJECT MATTER IN WHICHNYLOPLAST HAS PROPRIETARY RIGHTS. THE RECEIPTOR POSSESSION OF THIS PRINT DOES NOT CONFER,TRANSFER, OR LICENSE THE USE OF THE DESIGN ORTECHNICAL INFORMATION SHOWN HEREINREPRODUCTION OF THIS PRINT OR ANY INFORMATIONCONTAINED HEREIN, OR MANUFACTURE OF ANYARTICLE HEREFROM, FOR THE DISCLOSURE TO OTHERSIS FORBIDDEN, EXCEPT BY SPECIFIC WRITTENPERMISSION FROM NYLOPLAST.11-2-18NMHDUCTILE IRONDO NOT POLLUTE DRAINS TO WATERWAYSNYLOPLASTTSALPOLYNDUCTILEIRONTSALPOLYNDUCTILEIRON DUCTILE IRON DO NOT POLLUTE DRAINS TO WATERWAYS NYLOPLAST WHEN ARE DRAIN BASINS USED?2808AG _ _ X2810AG _ _ X2812AG _ _ X2815AG _ _ X2818AG _ _ X2824AG _ _ X2830AG _ _ X2836AG _ _ XWHEN ARE INLINE DRAINS USED?2708AG _ _ X2710AG _ _ X2712AG _ _ X2715AG _ _ X2718AG _ _ X2724AG _ _ X2730AG _ _ XTYPICAL INSTALLATIONSTYPICAL INSTALLATION OF NYLOPLASTDRAIN BASIN AND INLINE DRAIN1: TO ENTER AN EXISTING LINE USING A TEE & RISER2: AT THE BEGINNING OF A DRAIN LINE USING AN ELBOW & RISERTEEELBOW12" DRAIN BASIN(2) INLET & OUTLETADAPTERS CAN BEPUT ON ANY ANGLE1: TO CHANGE ELEVATION2: TO CHANGE PIPE DIAMETER3: TO CHANGE PIPE TYPE4: FOR SHALLOWAPPLICATIONS5: TO CHANGE DIRECTIONA°RISERDRAIN BASININLINE DRAIN10" INLINE DRAIN10" INLINE DRAIN(3) VARIABLE ELEVATIONWATERTIGHT ADAPTERS AVAILABLEFOR MOST COMMON PLASTIC PIPING SYSTEMS8"6"CORRUGATEDHDPE PIPESMOOTH WALLPVC1 - STRUCTURES & ADAPTERS AVAILABLE IN SIZES 8" - 36"2 - ADAPTERS CAN BE MOUNTED ON ANY ANGLE 0° TO 360°, TO DETERMINE MINIMUM ANGLE BETWEEN ADAPTERS SEE DRAWING NO. 7001-110-0123 - DRAIN BASIN TO BE CUSTOM MANUFACTURED ACCORDING TO PLAN DETAILS RISERS ARE NEEDED FOR BASINS OVER 84" DUE TO SHIPPING RESTRICTIONS SEE DRAWING NO. 7001-110-0654 - REDUCING CONES DOWN TO 30" DIAMETER WILL BE REQUIRED FOR 36" DRAIN BASINS.©2010 NYLOPLAST1C8.12C8.14C8.1REVF7001-110-111DWG NO.1 OF 1SHEET1:25SCALEDWG SIZEA3130 VERONA AVEBUFORD, GA 30518PHN (770) 932-2443FAX (770) 932-2490www.nyloplast-us.comDRAIN BASIN & INLINE DRAIN NON TRAFFIC INSTALLATIONTITLEPROJECT NO./NAMEMATERIALDATEREVISED BY9-30-99DATECJADRAWN BYTHIS PRINT DISCLOSES SUBJECT MATTER IN WHICHNYLOPLAST HAS PROPRIETARY RIGHTS. THE RECEIPTOR POSSESSION OF THIS PRINT DOES NOT CONFER,TRANSFER, OR LICENSE THE USE OF THE DESIGN ORTECHNICAL INFORMATION SHOWN HEREINREPRODUCTION OF THIS PRINT OR ANY INFORMATIONCONTAINED HEREIN, OR MANUFACTURE OF ANYARTICLE HEREFROM, FOR THE DISCLOSURE TO OTHERSIS FORBIDDEN, EXCEPT BY SPECIFIC WRITTENPERMISSION FROM NYLOPLAST.03-11-16NMHDRAIN BASININLINE DRAINTHE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE OR OTHERGRANULAR MATERIAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS I,CLASS II, OR CLASS III MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321.BEDDING & BACKFILL FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BEPLACED & COMPACTED UNIFORMLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321.NON TRAFFIC INSTALLATIONTOP SOILGRATE/COVERTOP SOILGRATE/COVER©2011 NYLOPLAST4" MIN ON 8" - 24"6" MIN ON 30" & 36"THE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE OR OTHERGRANULAR MATERIAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS I,CLASS II, OR CLASS III MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321.BEDDING & BACKFILL FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BEPLACED & COMPACTED UNIFORMLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321.REVD7003-110-057DWG NO.1 OF 1SHEET1:40SCALEDWG SIZEA3130 VERONA AVEBUFORD, GA 30518PHN (770) 932-2443FAX (770) 932-2490www.nyloplast-us.comINLINE DRAIN WITH DOME GRATEQUICK SPEC INSTALLATION DETAILTITLEPROJECT NO./NAMEMATERIALDATEREVISED BY03-25-10DATEEBCDRAWN BY03-15-16NMHMINIMUM PIPE BURIALDEPTH PER PIPEMANUFACTURERRECOMMENDATIONINVERT ACCORDING TOPLANS/TAKE OFFNYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN WITH DOME GRATE8" - 30"1 - 8" - 30" DOME GRATES SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PER ASTM A536 GRADE 70-50-05.2 - DRAINAGE CONNECTION STUB JOINT TIGHTNESS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM D3212 FOR CORRUGATED HDPE (ADS N-12/HANCOR DUAL WALL), N-12 HP, & PVC SEWER (4" - 24").3 - 8" - 30" DOME GRATES HAVE NO LOAD RATING(3) VARIOUS TYPES OF INLET & OUTLET ADAPTERSAVAILABLE: 4" - 30" FOR CORRUGATED HDPE(ADS N-12/HANCOR DUAL WALL, ADS/HANCORSINGLE WALL), N-12 HP, PVC SEWER (EX: SDR 35),PVC DWV (EX: SCH 40), PVC C900/C905,CORRUGATED & RIBBED PVCWATERTIGHT JOINT(CORRUGATED HDPE SHOWN)THIS PRINT DISCLOSES SUBJECT MATTER IN WHICHNYLOPLAST HAS PROPRIETARY RIGHTS. THE RECEIPTOR POSSESSION OF THIS PRINT DOES NOT CONFER,TRANSFER, OR LICENSE THE USE OF THE DESIGN ORTECHNICAL INFORMATION SHOWN HEREINREPRODUCTION OF THIS PRINT OR ANY INFORMATIONCONTAINED HEREIN, OR MANUFACTURE OF ANYARTICLE HEREFROM, FOR THE DISCLOSURE TO OTHERSIS FORBIDDEN, EXCEPT BY SPECIFIC WRITTENPERMISSION FROM NYLOPLAST.©2013 NYLOPLAST(1) INTEGRATED DUCTILE IRONGRATE TO MATCH BASIN O.D.THE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE OR OTHERGRANULAR MATERIAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS I,CLASS II, OR CLASS III MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321.BEDDING & BACKFILL FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BEPLACED & COMPACTED UNIFORMLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321.3C8.11FILTRATION BASIN CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING1.Install appropriate temporary erosion control devices to preventsediment from leaving or entering the practice during construction.2.All down-gradient perimeter sediment control bmp's must be inplace before any up gradient land disturbing activity begins.3.Perform continuous inspections of erosion control practices,especially after each rainfall event.4.Install all utilities (water, sanitary sewer, electric, natural gas,phone, fiber optic, etc) prior to setting final grade of filtration basin.5.Rough grade the site. If filtration areas are being used astemporary sediment basins during construction, leave a minimumof 1 feet of cover over the practice to protect the underlying soilsfrom clogging.6.Complete, stabilize, and vegetate all other site improvements.7.Construct and vegetate basin following stabilization of contributingdrainage area. Ensure that critical elevations, such as underdraininvert, top of media, top of mulch, and invert of overflow structure(if present) are correct.8.Remove temporary erosion control devices after the contributingdrainage area is adequately vegetated.CLEANOUT (TYPICAL)12FILTRATION SECTION(SHALL ADHERE TO MPCA MN STORMWATER GUIDELINES)3" MULCH30" FILTRATION MEDIA(MIX C SUITABLE FOR FILTRATION W/UNDERRAIN)3" CLEAN EMBEDMENT STONE COVER (#57 STONE)6" PERFORATED HDPE OR PVC UNDERDRAIN3" CLEAN EMBEDMENT STONE BEDDING (#57 STONE)TOTAL FILTRATION SECTION DEPTH = 3.75'WATER QUALITY VOLUME (WQV) ELEVATIONTOTAL STORAGE VOLUME ELEVATION994.50991.00989.00985.50TOP OF BASIN BERM995.00EMERGENCY SPILLWAYWQV ELEV.BOTTOM OF BASINUNDERDRAIN OUTLET INV.3.50'2.00'3.50'2=/>3.00'SEPARATION TO BEDROCK OR GROUNDWATER3NON-COMPACTED SUBGRADE (SEE STORMWATER MANUAL FOR SUBGRADE PREP.)3FILTRATION BASIN GENERAL NOTES1.In the event that sediment is introduced into the basin during orimmediately following excavation, this material shall be removedfrom the basin prior to continuing construction.2.See Minnesota Stormwater Manual for material specificationsrecommendations for filtration soil mixes, mulch, etc.3.Design is based on the WQV draining within 48 hours maximum.MAX. 3L:1H SLOPEFILTRATION BASIN WITH UNDERDRAINNOT TO SCALE317 DescriptionRev.DateMINNEWASHTA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA07.11.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-102PMJM06/13/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Minnewashta MF\CAD\Sheets\CIVIL DETAILS.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC8.2CIVIL DETAILS -SITE DETAILS1C8.22C8.23C8.24C8.25C8.26C8.27C8.28C8.2318 DescriptionRev.DateMINNEWASHTA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA07.11.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-102PMJM06/13/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Minnewashta MF\CAD\Sheets\CIVIL DETAILS.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC8.3CIVIL DETAILS -ADA DETAILS1C8.32C8.33C8.34C8.3319 DescriptionRev.DateMINNEWASHTA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA07.11.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-102PMJM06/13/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Minnewashta MF\CAD\Sheets\CIVIL DETAILS.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC8.4CIVIL DETAILS -ADA DETAILSCONTINUED1C8.41C8.43C8.5320 MIN N E S O T A H I G H W A Y N O . 4 1 ( H A Z E L T I N E B L V D ) ORIOLE AVENUE OEOEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE G G G G G G G G G G G G||LODLOD LOD LODLOD LOD LOD LODL O D L O DLODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLO D LO D LO D LO D LO D LO D2597259825992600259625952594 25932591259225902589258625852583258425802581258225792577257825762575DescriptionRev.DateMINNEWASHTA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA07.11.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-102PMJM06/13/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Minnewashta MF\CAD\Sheets\LANDSCAPE PLAN.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalLandscape Architect under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.Sheet:XX.XX.XX53234Joshua J McKinney, PLAN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NL0.1TREE INVENTORYSCALE IN FEET08040LEGENDTREE PROTECTION FENCE DETAILTREE INVENTORYSITE AREA:5.51 ACEXISTING SITE TREE COVERAGE AREA1.58 ACEXISTING SITE TREE COVERAGE PERCENTAGE28.8%BASE LINE TREE COVERAGE (PER TABLE 18-61-2b)20%TREE CANOPY ACREAGE TO REMAIN1.29 ACTREE CANOPY PERCENTAGE TO REMAIN23%NO TREE MITIGATION REQUIREDMAINTAIN EXISTINGGRADE WITH THE TREEPROTECTION FENCEUNLESS OTHERWISEINDICATED ON THEPLANS.2" X 6' STEEL POSTSOR APPROVED EQUAL.5" THICKLAYER OF MULCH.NOTES:1- LOCATE FENCING PER TREEPROTECTION & EROSION CONTROLPLANS.2- NO PRUNING SHALL BE PERFORMEDEXCEPT BY APPROVED ARBORIST.3- NO EQUIPMENT SHALL OPERATEINSIDE THEPROTECTIVE FENCING INCLUDINGDURING FENCEINSTALLATION AND REMOVAL.SECTION VIEWKEEP OUTTREEPROTECTIONAREATREE PROTECTIONFENCE: 48" HIGH DENSITYPOLYETHYLENE FENCINGWITH 3.5" X 1.5"OPENINGS; COLOR-ORANGE. STEEL POSTSINSTALLED AT 8' O.C.TREE PROTECTION FENCE/ LIMITS OF DISTURBANCETREES TO BE REMOVEDLODEXISTING TREE CANOPYTREE CANOPY TO REMAINTREE CANOPY TO BE REMOVEDTAG IDSPECIESDBHSTATUS2575RED PINE14PRESERVE2576SPRUCE18REMOVE2577LOCUST19REMOVE2578ASH13REMOVE2579WT. PINE21REMOVE2580MAPLE14PRESERVE2581BIRCH12PRESERVE2582ASH14PRESERVE2583LOCUST16PRESERVE2584BIRCH18PRESERVE2585ASH27REMOVE2586ASH19REMOVE2587ASH18OFF SITE2588ASH18OFF SITE2589BASSWOOD22REMOVE2590ASH18REMOVE2591ELM21REMOVE2592ASH21REMOVE2593ASH13REMOVE2594CRABAPPLE13REMOVE2595WILLOW18REMOVE2596WILLOW39REMOVE2597ASH26REMOVE2598MAPLE12REMOVE2599MAPLE13REMOVE2600MAPLE14REMOVETREE PRESERVATION CALCULATIONS321 3 STORYMULTIFAMILY44 UNITSFFE: 1011.00GFE: 1000.33HYDSTORMWATERFILTRATION BASINTOP BERM: 995.00EO: 994.50HWL:994.39BOT:989.00BOT(SAND):985.25WLWLWL |||||||||||||||DDDSSSPROPOSED PUBLICDRAINAGE, UTILITY ANDROADWAY EASEMENTMIN N E S O T A H I G H W A Y N O . 4 1 ( H A Z E L T I N E B L V D ) ORIOLE AVENUE OEOEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE G G G G G G G G G G G G||9SX216NX21JC1UA1AF31RA21GT24NX8HP8JC5HP8JC3HP3SX23SX23JC5HP5HX410JC4AC4AF5PA2DescriptionRev.DateMINNEWASHTA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA07.11.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-102PMJM06/13/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Minnewashta MF\CAD\Sheets\LANDSCAPE PLAN.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalLandscape Architect under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.Sheet:XX.XX.XX53234Joshua J McKinney, PLAN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NL1.0LANDSCAPE PLANLANDSCAPE NOTES1.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ONRECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTSTAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEINGEXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONSPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OFDISCREPANCIES.2.ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATER MAIN MATERIAL ANDINSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER CITY REQUIREMENTS, MINNESOTA PLUMBINGCODE, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARDSPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION ANDSANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITYENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA.3.PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARYFEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSED WORK OR VERIFYWITH THE OWNER OR ENGINEER THAT PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMITFEES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISESCALE IN FEET08040LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTSTREES PLANTEDOVERSTORY TREESCONIFEROUS TREESORNAMENTAL TREESTOTAL TREESPARKING LOT PLANTINGAREA REQUIREMENT75416LANDSCAPING REQUIRED:·NO TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR MITIGATION- SEE L0.1·LANDSCAPING MUSE MEET 1% OF PROJECT BUDGET (Sec. 20-1179)·8% MINIMUM PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE AREA (20-1181)8%16.11%SYMBOLCODECOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZETYPEQTYTREESUAAMERICAN ELM / ULMUS AMERICANA `PRINCETON`B & B2.5"CAL1AFSIENNA GLEN MAPLE / ACER FREEMANII `SIENNA GLEN`B & B2.5"CAL5GTSKYLINE HONEY LOCUST / GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS `SKYLINE`B & B2.5"CAL1CONIFERSPA2NORWAY SPRUCE / PICEA ABIESB & B5ORN. TREESACAUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY / AMELANCHIER CANADENSIS `AUTUMN BRILLIANCE`B & B2"CAL4CODECOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZETYPEQTYSHRUBSRA2GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC / RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW`5 GAL31SX2LILAC / SYRINGA X `BLOOMERANG`5 GAL15HPLITTLE LIME HYDRANGEA / HYDRANGEA PANICULATA `JANE`5 GAL21JCMINT JULEP JUNIPER / JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS `MINT JULEP`5 GAL50PERENNIALSHX4PLANTAIN LILY / HOSTA X `GUACAMOLE`1 GAL5NXWALKERS LOW CATMINT / NEPETA X FAASSENII `WALKERS LOW`1 GAL40SYMBOLCODECOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMEQTYGROUND COVERSMS8FORMERLY MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 / MNDOT SEED MIX WET DITCH15,797 SFMS5FORMERLY MNDOT SEED MIX 35-221/36-211 / MNDOT SEED MIX SOUTHERN SHORTGRASS ROADSIDE63,270 SFTSSOD / TURF SOD HIGHLAND SOD24,635 SFPLANT SCHEDULE322 kaas wilson architects Chanhassen ApartmentsPROJECT DATA 1.0 Chanhassen Apartments 7/9/2025 UNIT MIX - GROSS AREA Name Count Unit Gross Area Total Area %Main Floor 1 BR Unit 1-0 14 737 ft² 10,313 ft² 32% Unit 1-1 3 681 ft² 2,043 ft² 7% 17 12,357 ft² 39% 2BR Unit 2-0 11 1,050 ft² 11,546 ft² 25% Unit 2-1 9 1,033 ft² 9,301 ft² 20% Unit 2-2 2 1,032 ft² 2,063 ft² 5% 22 22,910 ft² 50% 3BR Unit 3-0 3 1,300 ft² 3,901 ft² 7% Unit 3-2 2 1,315 ft² 2,629 ft² 5% 5 6,530 ft² 11% Grand total 44 41,797 ft² 100% PARKING Level Type Count Level -1 Parking Garage 44 Level 1 Surface 44 88 GROSS AREA - TOTAL Level Area Level 3 17,829 ft² Level 2 17,829 ft² Level 1 17,829 ft² Level -1 18,143 ft² Grand total 71,630 ft² 1 3D Axon 323 CV C N N N N N N N N N N 9x18 N N N N N N N 9x18 NNNNNNNNNN9x18N N N N N N N N N N N 9x18 N N N N N N N 9x18 H YD1 STORY GARAGE/ 3 STORY RESIDENCES 44 UNITS 1 2 3 HAZELTINE BLVD/HWY 41TO TROUVAILLE MEMORY CARE SUITES 4 44 PARKING STALLS 1 BUILDING ENTRANCE 2 GARAGE ENTRANCE 3 ROOF TOP PATIO 4 STORMWATER RETENTION SITE PLAN KEY kaas wilson architects Chanhassen ApartmentsSITE PLAN 2.0 Chanhassen Apartments 7/9/2025 1/64" = 1'-0"1 SD Site Plan 324 6.11 6.1 2 6.1 3 6.2 1 6.22 6.2 3 44 PARKING STALLS 210 ft² Stair 99 ft² Elev 365 ft² Core 210 ft² Stair 747 ft² Maintenance kaas wilson architects Chanhassen ApartmentsFLOOR PLANS - LEVEL -1 3.0 Chanhassen Apartments 7/9/2025 1" = 30'-0"1 Level -1 325 ENTRY 1,050 ft² Community Room 737 ft² Fitness 1,300 ft² Unit 3-0 1,315 ft² Unit 3-2 1,032 ft² Lobby 1,033 ft² Unit 2-1 1,033 ft² Unit 2-1 737 ft² Unit 1-01,050 ft² Unit 2-0 681 ft² Unit 1-1 737 ft² Unit 1-0 737 ft² Unit 1-0 1,033 ft² Unit 2-11,050 ft² Unit 2-0 1,050 ft² Unit 2-0 737 ft² Unit 1-0 99 ft² Elev 485 ft² Core 6.11 6.1 2 6.1 3 6.2 1 6.22 6.2 3 276 ft² Stair 276 ft² Stair kaas wilson architects Chanhassen ApartmentsFLOOR PLANS - LEVEL 1 3.1 Chanhassen Apartments 7/9/2025 1" = 30'-0"1 Level 1 UNIT MIX - GROSS AREA Name Count Unit Gross Area Total Area %Main Floor 1 BR Unit 1-0 14 737 ft² 10,313 ft² 32% Unit 1-1 3 681 ft² 2,043 ft² 7% 17 12,357 ft² 39% 2BR Unit 2-0 11 1,050 ft² 11,546 ft² 25% Unit 2-1 9 1,033 ft² 9,301 ft² 20% Unit 2-2 2 1,032 ft² 2,063 ft² 5% 22 22,910 ft² 50% 3BR Unit 3-0 3 1,300 ft² 3,901 ft² 7% Unit 3-2 2 1,315 ft² 2,629 ft² 5% 5 6,530 ft² 11% Grand total 44 41,797 ft² 100% GROSS AREA - TOTAL Level Area Level 3 17,829 ft² Level 2 17,829 ft² Level 1 17,829 ft² Level -1 18,143 ft² Grand total 71,630 ft² 326 1,050 ft² Unit 2-0 737 ft² Unit 1-0 1,300 ft² Unit 3-0 1,315 ft² Unit 3-2 1,032 ft² Unit 2-2 1,033 ft² Unit 2-1 1,033 ft² Unit 2-1 1,050 ft² Unit 2-0 681 ft² Unit 1-1 737 ft² Unit 1-0 737 ft² Unit 1-0 1,033 ft² Unit 2-11,050 ft² Unit 2-0 1,050 ft² Unit 2-0 737 ft² Unit 1-0 99 ft² Elev 485 ft² Core 6.11 6.1 2 6.1 3 6.2 1 6.22 6.2 3 276 ft² Stair 276 ft² Stair 737 ft² Unit 1-0 kaas wilson architects Chanhassen ApartmentsFLOOR PLANS - LEVEL 2 3.2 Chanhassen Apartments 7/9/2025 1" = 30'-0"1 Level 2 327 843 ft² Sky Lounge 1,050 ft² Unit 2-0 1,300 ft² Unit 3-0 1,032 ft² Unit 2-2 1,033 ft² Unit 2-1 1,033 ft² Unit 2-1 1,050 ft² Unit 2-0 681 ft² Unit 1-1 1,033 ft² Unit 2-11,050 ft² Unit 2-0 1,050 ft² Unit 2-0 99 ft² Elev 485 ft² Core 6.11 6.1 2 6.1 3 6.2 1 6.22 6.2 3 276 ft² Stair 276 ft² Stair 737 ft² Unit 1-0 737 ft² Unit 1-0 737 ft² Unit 1-0 737 ft² Unit 1-0 472 ft² Rooftop Deck 737 ft² Unit 1-0 kaas wilson architects Chanhassen ApartmentsFLOOR PLANS - LEVEL 3 3.3 Chanhassen Apartments 7/9/2025 1" = 30'-0"1 Level 3 328 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 111'-1 7/8" Level -1 89'-4" Level 3 122'-3 3/4" Truss Brg. 131'-4 7/8" BRICK CFB VERTICAL BOARD & BATTEN ALTERNATING CFB LAP SIDING COLORED ROCKFACE CMU CFB PANEL SIDINGLevel 1 to Top of Roof33'-5 3/4"Level 1 to Top of Parapet34'-4 7/8"Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 111'-1 7/8" Level -1 89'-4" Level 3 122'-3 3/4" Truss Brg. 131'-4 7/8" BRICK CFB VERTICAL BOARD & BATTEN COLORED ROCKFACE CMU Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 111'-1 7/8" Level -1 89'-4" Level 3 122'-3 3/4" Truss Brg. 131'-4 7/8" BRICK CFB VERTICAL BOARD & BATTEN COLORED ROCKFACE CMU ALTERNATING CFB LAP SIDING N kaas wilson architects 7/9/2025 1:58:30 PM Chanhassen ApartmentsEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 6.1 Chanhassen Apartments 1/8" = 1'-0"1 East Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0"2 North End Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0"3 West Elevation 329 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 111'-1 7/8" Level -1 89'-4" Level 3 122'-3 3/4" Truss Brg. 131'-4 7/8" BRICK CFB VERTICAL BOARD & BATTEN ALTERNATING CFB LAP SIDING COLORED ROCKFACE CMU CFB PANEL SIDING Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 111'-1 7/8" Level -1 89'-4" Level 3 122'-3 3/4" Truss Brg. 131'-4 7/8" BRICK CFB VERTICAL BOARD & BATTEN Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 111'-1 7/8" Level -1 89'-4" Level 3 122'-3 3/4" Truss Brg. 131'-4 7/8" BRICK ALTERNATING CFB LAP SIDING CFB VERTICAL BOARD & BATTEN N kaas wilson architects 7/9/2025 1:58:32 PM Chanhassen ApartmentsEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 6.2 Chanhassen Apartments 1/8" = 1'-0"1 South Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0"2 East End Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0"3 North Elevation 330 Application: Rezoning & Site Plan Review. (Planning Case #2025-11) Staff Report Date: October 8, 2025 Drafted By: Rachel Arsenault, Associate Planner Joe Seidl, Water Resources Engineer Mackenze Grunig, Project Engineer Planning Commission Review Date: September 16, 2025 City Council Review Date: October 13, 2025 SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The Applicant is requesting rezoning and site plan review of a 44-unit multi-family apartment project. LOCATION: 6440 Hazeltine Boulevard PID: 250940020 (Subject Property) APPLICANT: Headwaters Development LLC PROPERTY OWNER: Clover Investments LLC PRESENT ZONING: Single-Family Residential 2040 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Medium Density SITE PLAN ACREAGE: 5.6 Acres SITE PLAN DENSITY: 7.8 Units/Acre PROPOSED MOTION: “The Chanhassen City Council approves the requested rezoning, and site plan review for the 44- unit Minnewashta Apartments subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision.” 331 Page 2 of 14 LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city has discretion in approving a rezoning because the city is acting in its legislative or policy-making capacity. A rezoning must be consistent with the city’s Comprehensive Plan. The city’s discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with zoning ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the city must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Notice of the public hearing at Planning Commission was mailed to all property owners within 500 feet which is the minimum required. The city extended the mailed notice beyond the 500 feet minimum and sent notice to 74 property owners in the area. The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on July 30, 2025. This neighborhood meeting was conducted entirely by the Applicant to gather feedback from adjacent property owners prior to the city’s review of the development application. The city sent an email update to the “Proposed Developments” email subscription group regarding the project on July 24, August 7, August 12, August 18 and September 16. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article 20-XXIII, Division 20-XXIII-9 Design Standards for Multifamily Developments City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan and 2040 Future Land Use Map ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DISTRICTS Wetland Protection – Not applicable Bluff Protection – Not applicable Shoreland Management – Not applicable Floodplain Overlay – Not within FEMA Flood Zones 2018 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The Applicant is proposing the rezoning of the property from Single-Family Residential (RSF) to Mixed Medium Density Residential District (R-8), along with a site plan review for a 44-unit multi-family building. BACKGROUND This property was platted in 2015 as a part of the Beehive Home 2nd Addition. Prior to the replatting, this property was used a single-family residence. REZONING REVIEW The Developer proposes to rezone the property from Single-Family Residential (RSF) to Mixed Medium Density Residential District (R-8). This proposed rezoning is in accordance with the 2040 Land Use Comprehensive Plan, which designates this property Residential Medium 332 Page 3 of 14 Density with an allowable net density of 4-8 units/acre. Within the Residential Medium Density land use designation, the following zoning districts are allowed: Mixed Low Density (R-4), Residential Low & Medium Density (RLM), Mixed Medium Density (R-8), and Planned Unit Development Residential (PUD-R). Based on the City of Chanhassen’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan and the 2040 Land Use designation of Residential Medium Density for the subject property, development of the property is required to have a minimum of 22.4 units and a maximum of 44.8 units. Properties adjacent to the Subject Property are guided Public/Semi Public, Office/Medium Density Residential, Residential Low Density, and Parks/Open Space. SITE PLAN REVIEW Parking City Code section 20-1124 establishes the minimum number of parking spaces required to be provided for multifamily housing development projects. Based on the project as proposed, a minimum of 86 parking spaces are required, 44 of which are required to be enclosed garage parking. The project proposes 44 underground garage parking spaces and 44 outdoor parking spaces, for a total of 88 parking spaces. The proposed parking plan meets the minimum requirements established by city code. Unit Type # of Units Parking Required By Unit Type 1 Bedroom 17 21 2 Bedroom or greater 27 54 Required Guest Parking 11 Total Minimum Required: 86 Parking Required Parking Shown Total Enclosed Spaces 44 44 Outdoor Surface Parking Spaces 42 44 Total Parking Spaces Shown 88 Building Height In the zoning district requested, R-8, and the current zoning district, RSF, building height is limited to 35 feet. Building elevations have been provided which show a building height of 34’4 7/8”. City Code defines building height as “the vertical distance between the highest adjoining ground level at the building or ten feet above the lowest ground level, whichever is lower, and the highest point of a flat roof or average height of the highest of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof.” Currently the elevation shows the building height being measured from the ground level at the building. However the lower level has an elevation of 89’4”. Ten feet above 333 Page 4 of 14 the lower floor elevation would be 99’4” which is 6” below the line currently being measured from. The elevation shall also be measured to the highest parapet. The Developer will need to update the elevation measurement to align with city code definition and ensure the building height is below the maximum allowed of 35’0”. Site furnishings The project as proposed shows a sidewalk connection from the building to the neighboring regional park trail as well as future trail on the west side of Hazeltine Blvd. The building will also contain a gym and community room on the first floor with a sky lounge with rooftop deck located on the second floor on the southwest corner of the proposed apartment building Loading, mechanical, and refuse areas Garbage service, recycling service, and mechanical is shown to be located inside the garage. Any rooftop-mounted equipment shall meet the screening requirements of City Code. Lighting The site plan shows 8 light poles dispersed around the parking and drive areas. Fixture height shall not exceed 30 feet. Lighting on the building faces shall also be restricted to having a total cutoff angle equal to or less than 90 degrees. The Developer shall provide shop drawings of the proposed lights, as well as a photometric plan. Signage The plans provided do not depict signage on the site. Signage for the property shall comply with City Code. Sign permits will be required to be applied for and approved at the time of building permit. Hard Surface Coverage The proposed lot coverage for this development is 19.3%, this is below the lot coverage maximum of 50% for the requested zoning district of Mixed Medium Density Residential District (R-8). BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Required Architectural Standards The proposed architecture is consistent with the Division 20-XXIII-9 Design Standards for Multifamily Developments. Massing and Placement The proposed site plan is for one building with two wings aligned to create an L-shaped building. The location of the building is strategically placed to work with the current grade and preserve the natural resources on the property. This is achieved by keeping the building and parking area closer to Hazeltine Boulevard. 334 Page 5 of 14 Additionally, the building is located on the southeastern portion of the site such that the proposed apartment building is as far as is practicable from the adjacent single-family homes along the northwest portion of the proposed development site. The Sky Lounge/Rooftop Deck are shown in the southwest corner of the proposed building which is furthest from adjacent residential properties to mitigate any noise generation . Materials and Color The building proposed contains four main materials, brick, board & batten, lap siding, and colored rockface CMU. The design pulls inspiration from architecture along Hazeltine Boulevard, providing a cohesive and timeless feeling to the area. The color palette uses mute d earth tones including a red/brown brick mix, dark grey vertical board and batten and an off- white lap siding. 3D Rendering and Building Elevations 335 Page 6 of 14 336 Page 7 of 14 LANDSCAPING – TREE COVERAGE The Developer submitted tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations. Total upland area (excl wetlands, bluff) 5.51 acres Baseline canopy coverage 1.58 acres or 28.8% Minimum canopy coverage required 1.37 acres or 25% Proposed tree preservation 1.29 acres or 23% Minimum canopy coverage to be replaced 0.11 acres or 2% The applicant must bring the canopy coverage on site up to the 1.37 acres , which equates to the 25% required. The difference between the required coverage and the remaining coverage is multiplied by 1.2 for total area to be replaced. The total area to be replaced is .13 acres or 5,750 square feet of canopy coverage. One tree is valued at 1.089 square feet of canopy coverage. The landscaping plan proposes planting 16 trees, which equates to 17,424sf or 0.40 acres of canopy coverage. The project as proposed adheres to the tree coverage requirements outlined in city code. The Planning Commission recommended that additional buffer plantings be included in the proposed development along the northern property boundary. Staff has added this as a condition of approval. PARKING LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS Staff have analyzed the site plan and found the requirements in Sec 20-1181 have been satisfied by additional screening on the site. In addition, the applicant is providing the required landscaping withing the vehicular use areas. PROPOSED PLANTING SCHEDULE The Applicant proposed planting 16 trees, 4 of which would be ornamental serviceberry trees. Also shown are 117 shrubs, and 45 perennials. Tree plantings are required to adhere to the city’s planting diversity requirement. PROJECT OVERVIEW – ENGINEERING AND WATER RESOURCES The Applicant is requesting rezoning and site plan review of a 44-unit multi-family apartment project located at 6440 Hazeltine Blvd. Construction plans and Stormwater Reports developed by Measure Group dated June 13, 2025 were reviewed by staff. The proposed design would create ~1.15 acres of new impervious area in the form of an apartment building, parking lots, sidewalks, and streets. Stormwater is proposed to be managed by an above-ground stormwater pond located in the NW corner of the property. GRADING & DRAINAGE The site is located west of Hazeltine Boulevard (Highway 41), directly across the highway from the entrance to Minnetonka Middle School. The property is currently undeveloped, with the only impervious surfaces being a small section of an access drive (serving the adjacent property to the north) and a small shed. 337 Page 8 of 14 In the existing condition most of the site drains to a wetland located on the southwest portion of the property. A small area near the site entrance drains northward to the neighboring property, where runoff is treated by an existing private filtration bas in. This basin currently discharges through the Minnewashta Apartments property before ultimately flowing into the wetland onsite. That discharge pattern will remain unchanged in the proposed development. In the proposed condition stormwater runoff will be directed through a storm sewer system to a new on-site filtration basin. This proposed basin will outlet to the wetland located on the southwest portion of the site which maintains the current drainage pattern. A small portion of the entrance drive will continue to drain northward, consistent with existing conditions. Proposed discharge rates to the north will need to be verified to ensure they do not exceed current rates. There is an opportunity for the developer to partner with the city to construct a regional stormwater treatment facility on the site as part of the development project. In this scenario the applicant would oversize the onsite stormwater management system to provide stormwater treatment for stormwater runoff from the planned TH 41 round -a-bout Project and from city right of way. In return the City would own and maintain the stormwater BMP and could potentially offer financial relief in the form of reduced stormwater development fees. The proposed design shows a regional treatment facility that could treat stormwater from TH 41 however based on the location and elevation it would be difficult to route city stormwater from the north to the proposed system. There appears to be an opportun ity to optimize the design by shifting the regional stormwater BMP down the hill near the existing wetland which could facilitate the treatment of more stormwater from the north. As such the applicant shall work with city staff to improve the design of the stormwater management system onsite. WETLANDS The proposed plans show one (1) wetland onsite located in the southwest corner of the property that was delineated by Kjolhaug Environmental Services on October 25, 2017. The wetland is part of a larger complex that extends onto both regional park and city property. The delineation was approved by the City of Chanhassen in its role as the local governing unit (LGU) that is responsible for administering the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). The Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) made up of representatives from the city, Watershed District, MN Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and Carver County Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) are all part of the WCA process in reviewing wetland applications including types and boundaries. The Wetland type on site was determined to be a shallow marsh. Wetland decisions, including delineations, are only good for 5 -years. As such the applicant will need to complete another delineation to confirm the boundary and type and complete a MnRAM assessment to determine the buffer and setback requirements. The pla ns show that the wetland is located a significant distance from the proposed development therefore the 338 Page 9 of 14 wetland rules will likely not impact the design. A permanent wetland buffer with signs is required and will need to be included in the final plans. The wetland and buffer shall be placed within a drainage and utility easement or outlot. SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN The applicant is proposing the construction of 8” PVC mains for the sanitary sewer and water needs of the Minnewashta Apartment utility plans do indicate that the extension of 8” PVC C900 is planned for. Sanitary sewer mains and water mains will be discussed prior to final plans if they will be publicly owned and maintained or privately owned and maintained. TRAFFIC Staff has reviewed the preliminary traffic memo for the proposed Minnewashta Apartments. While the estimated trip generation is relatively low, approximately one vehicle every three minutes during peak hours. Due to the existing traffic operations of the adjacent intersection staff included the condition that a temporary traffic signal be installed until such time as the permanent roundabout is constructed as the intersection control. MnDOT has approved the temporary traffic signal as the adjacent roadway, Highway 41, is under MnDOT jurisdiction. The Site Plan as proposed, would include the reconstruction of the current access to the Trouvaille Memory Care Suites which is an improvement that was to be completed with the construction of the proposed roundabout at the intersection of Hazeltine Blvd and Minnetonka Middle School West (MMSW) which is the same intersection that this project would route vehicle trips through. Additionally, this project would be responsible for constructing a portion of the future roundabout as well as stormwater management. Each of these improvements reduces the future cost of the MMSW intersection roundabout . EROSION CONTROL The proposed development will create greater than one (1) acre of land disturbance and therefore will be subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimin ation/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). A Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) was included in the preliminary site plan submittal. The SWPPP is a required submittal element for final site plan review along with the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) in accordance with Section 19-145 of City Ordinance. No earth disturbing activities may occur until the SWPPP is formally approved. This SWPPP shall be a standalone document consistent with the NPDES Construction Permit and shall contain all required elements of the permit. The SWPPP will need to be updated as the plans are finalized when the contractor and their sub - contractors are identified and as other conditions change. An updated SWPPP shall be submitted and approved prior to recording the final site plan agreement. All erosion and sediment control BMP’s shall be installed and inspected prior to initiation of site grading activities. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT Article VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required storm water management development standards. Section 19-141 states that “these development standards shall be 339 Page 10 of 14 reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features.” These standards include abstraction of runoff and water quality treatment resulting in the removal of 9 0% total suspended solids (TSS) and 60% total phosphorous (TP). The proposed project is located within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and is therefore subject to the watershed’s rules and regulations. A MCWD permit will be required for final site plan approval. The site is proposing to meet stormwater management requirements through an onsite filtration basin. Soil borings were not provided and are needed to confirm the feasibility of infiltration onsite as noted by the developer. If infiltration is feasible, the design will need to be modified to provide infiltration as required by the NPDES permit and MCWD regulations. Water quality modeling is needed to confirm that the site is in compliance with the City’s water quality treatment requirements (60% TP and 90% TSS removals). As currently proposed, the filtration basin was sized to account for 2.59 acres of impervious (4.89 acres of total drainage) from the future roundabout and Minnetonka Middle School entrance drive but not for any drainage from the north. The basin design should be modified to account for an additional 2.64 acres of impervious (7.52 acres of total drainage) from the north if the design is meant to be a regional treatment facility. Given the elevation of the existing storm sewer at the low point on 64th Street West to route the drainage from the north to the proposed regional basin the location and elevation of the basin will need to be modified. A liner may be required if three feet of separation between the updated basin elevation and groundwater cannot be provided. The city would need to reconstruct the existing 30” storm sewer from the low point along 34th Street West with 36” storm sewer in order to make the connection feasible. The applicant shall work with staff to confirm the size of the regional treatment facility to determine the scale partnership between the city and developer. As outlined in the City’s Surface Water Management Plan adopted in December 2018, the City requires at least 3 feet of freeboard between a building elevation and adjacent ponding features. Freeboard requirements are currently being met to the proposed buil ding but appears not to meet the requirement for the existing homes located to the north. The design would safely route surface away from the existing homes in an emergency, but groundwater interactions would need to be analyzed. As such the applicant shall submit additional information and potentially redesign the pond to meet freeboard requirements. The city also requires at least 1 foot of freeboard between emergency overflows (EOF) and building opening elevations. This is not currently being met between the EOF for the green space low point east of the building. Currently the basin is planned to be a regional stormwater basin sized for offsite City drainage, the basin will be owned and maintained by the city. The proposed basin and maintenance access shall be covered under drainage and utility easement to allow for future maintenance activities. If the regional stormwater design does not work, then the BMP would become private, and an operations and maintenance agreement would be required to ensure the system functions as designed. 340 Page 11 of 14 The applicant shall provide final versions of all modeling (HydroCAD and any water quality models developed) and Stormwater Management Report to address all City and MCWD comments and confirm rate, volume and water quality requirements are met as part of t he final site plan approval. RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission recommends approval of the requested rezoning and site plan for the construction of the project as proposed, subject to updating of plans based on staff review comments. APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTS PLANNING: 1. Developer shall add property line measurements to the site plan. 2. Developer shall update site plan to include all dimensions for driveway access from right-of-way. 3. Developer shall provide details of trash enclosure locations in the building. 4. Developer shall provide utility locations, proposed screening if applicable, and a sight line diagram for any utilities proposed on the roof. 5. A photometric plan shall be provided with the civil plan set. 6. Building elevation measurement to be updated to provide a measurement based on city code definition. Building shall not measure greater than 35’0”. 7. Developer shall provide measurements for parking spaces and drive aisles within the enclosed garage. 8. Developer shall establish additional landscape buffering to buffer adjacent properties to the north. 9. Developer shall deed the area shown as “proposed public drainage, utility and roadway easement area” to the city. FORESTRY 1. Applicant must include the condition of each tree as part of the tree survey. Condition should be noted as “Poor, Fair, or Good” as is standard for forestry field identification. 2. Applicant shall confirm all trees over ten inches in diameter and any damaged or diseased trees on site are included in the inventory. 3. Applicant must include the total square footage of the vehicular use area. 4. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed around existing trees to be saved prior to any construction activities and remain installed until completion. 5. All trees must be planted outside of the city’s right-of-way. 6. Landscaping plan shall meet the minimum buffer yard requirements. ENGINEERING: 1. A temporary traffic signal shall be installed at the adjacent intersection of Hwy 41 and Minnetonka Middle School West until such time that the permanent roundabout is constructed as the intersection control. 341 Page 12 of 14 2. The developer shall enter into Encroachment Agreements for private improvements (e.g., retaining walls and monument signage) located within the 10-foot-wide public drainage and utility corridor abutting the right -of-way prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Any previously recorded easements located within proposed public right -of-way or proposed public drainage and utility easements must be vacated prior to or concurrently with the final site plan. 4. The applicant and their Engineer shall work with City staff in amending the construction plans to fully satisfy construction plan comments and concerns. Final construction plans will be subject to review and approval by staff prior to recording the site plan agreement. 5. Developer shall provide documentation of coordinate with adjacent Trouvaille Property Owner. 6. All newly constructed streets and sidewalks, with the exception to the sidewalk & trail on TH 41 will be privately owned and maintained. The developer shall provide for review and approval maintenance agreements for these improvements, as well as cross access/parking agreements for the shared parking, prior to or concurrently with the recording of the site plan agreement. 7. Construction design elements associated with the street plans such as stationing, curb tables and alignments, centerline grades, and intersection details will be required prior to site plan agreement approval. 8. Pavement removals shall extend to the end of the curb and gutter removals. 9. Developer shall provide a color-coded map identifying what improvements are public and what are private with final site plan. 10. The Developer will be required to enter into a Site Plan Agreement with the City and all applicable securities and fees provided prior to recording of the site plan agreement. 11. It is the Developer’s responsibility to ensure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project (i.e. Army Corps of Engineers, DNR, MnDOT, Carver County, RPBC Watershed District, Board of Water and Soil Resources, PCA, MDH, MPCA, etc.). Applicant shall provide a copy of all permits prior to starting construction. 12. The Developer shall incorporate the latest City Detail Plates and Specifications into the site plan application. 13. Provide sidewalk connection from apartments to TH 41 trail system. 14. City Standard Detail Plates shall be included in the construction plan set and displayed in a layout format of 2 rows by 4 columns for consistency with City expectations. 15. Developer provided a technical memo to address traffic concerns due to the connection to TH 41. Applicant shall provide a traffic study for site plan documents and an operational analysis. 16. Developer shall provide a plan sheet showing access during TH 41 round-a-bout construction. 17. The Developer is connecting into City owned sanitary sewer main. Developer shall clean and televise the downstream pipe and provide that tape to the Project Engineer. 18. The City is in the process of retracting the condemnation of a portion of land shown within the plans. The Developer shall deed an easement to the City over the area shown 342 Page 13 of 14 as “CITY OF CHANHASSEN DRAINAGE, UTILITY, AND TRANSPORTATION EASEMENT” at no cost. WATER RESOURCES: 1. Soil borings must be provided to confirm infeasibility of infiltration onsite. If infiltration is feasible, the design will need to be modified to provide infiltration as required by the NPDES permit and MCWD. A geotechnical report with soil boring analysis shall be provided with all subsequent submittals. 2. If the basin is designed to be a regional facility owned and operated by the city, then the design shall be modified to allow for storm sewer from the north to be routed and treated by the basin onsite in addition to the future Hazeltine Avenue roundabout and Minnetonka Middle School entrance drive already included. A liner may be required if three feet of separation between the updated basin elevation and the groundwater cannot be provided. 3. The proposed regional stormwater basin and proposed maintenance access shall be shown under drainage and utility easement. 4. The developer shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide necessary financial security to guarantee compliance with the terms of the final site plan approval and construction of infrastructure onsite. The site plan agreement shall be recorded concurrently with the site plan agreement. 5. It is the developer’s responsibility to ensure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project (i.e. Carver County, MCWD, Board of Water and Soil Resources, MnDOT, etc.) prior to the commencement of construction activities. 6. The developer shall submit additional information to verify the design meets the freeboard requirement to the stormwater basin. A modification to the basin grading may be needed. 7. The applicant shall provide an updated wetland delineation to verify the current conditions of the site as part of the final plan submittal. The final plans shall include a wetland buffer with permanent signs as outlined by city ordinance. The wetland and buffer shall be placed within an outlot or drainage and utility easement. 8. The developer and their Engineer shall work with City staff in amending the construction plans, dated June 13, 2025 created by Measure Group to fully satisfy construction plan comments and concerns. Final construction plans will be subject to review and approval by staff prior to recording site plan agreement. 9. An Operations and Maintenance plan for all proposed private BMPs including the inspection frequency, maintenance schedule, and responsible party shall be submitted with the site plan. 10. The applicant shall provide updated H&H and water quality modelling to verify that the design meets all applicable design standards including those from MCWD with the final plans submittal. BUILDING: 1. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction. 343 Page 14 of 14 2. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review 4. The building is required to have automatic fire extinguishing systems. 5. Structure proximity to property lines (and other buildings) will have an impact on the code requirements for the proposed buildings, including but not limited to; allowable size, protected openings and fire-resistive construction. These requirements will be addressed when complete building and site plans are submitted. 6. Building plans must include a code analysis that contains the following information: Key Plan, Occupancy group, Type of construction, Allowable height and area, Fire sprinklers, Separated or non-separated, Fire resistive elements (Ext walls, Bearing walls - exterior or interior, Shaft, Incidental use), Occupant load, Exits required (Common path, Travel distance), Minimum plumbing fixture count 7. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high, measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. Retaining walls (if present) under four feet in height require a zoning permit. 8. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. 9. Accessibility will have to be provided to all portions of the development and a percentage of the units may also be required to be accessible or adaptable in accordance with Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1341. FIRE: 1. A turning radius study will need to be completed with the dimensions of our largest fire apparatus (ladder truck) to assure the parking lot will work as an access road and fire apparatus turn around 2. The parking lot will need to maintain a drivable width of 26 feet since it is technically a fire apparatus access road. There are parts showing less than 26 feet. 3. Since there is no access for fire apparatus on all sides of building, balconies will require dry head fire sprinklers to provide a safe area of refuge for residents. 4. All exterior egress doors will require a paved path to the public right of way. Rear of building does not show a path. 5. Standpipes will be required in stairwells and underground garage 6. Full fire sprinkler system and fire alarm systems required. 344 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION IN RE: Application of Headwaters Development LLC, for a rezoning and site plan review. On September 16, 2025, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application for rezoning and site plan review for the construction of a 44- unit multi-family apartment building. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed development which was preceded by a published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and recommended approval of the request subject to staff conditions. On October 13, 2025, the City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the rezoning and site plan review. Based on the rezoning and site plan review applications before the City Council, the City Council makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. On July 11, 2025 the City received a land use application for the property legally described in attachment Exhibit A for the following: A. A rezoning from Single-Family Residential (RSF) to Mixed Medium Density Residential District (R-8). B. A site plan review for the construction of a 44-unit apartment building. 2. The property is currently zoned Single-Family Residential. 3. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan as Residential Medium Density. 4. The R-8 zoning district is an eligible zoning district for the Residential Medium Density land use designation. REZONING FINDINGS 5. The proposed R-8 Mixed Medium Density Residential District meets the required standards for approval: a. The proposed zoning has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan for Residential Medium Density land use areas. b. The proposed zoning is compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. The adjacent properties have a variety of zoning districts including R-8 Mixed Medium Density, RSF Single Family Residential, Rural Residential, and Office/Institutional. The proposed zoning district of R-8 Mixed Medium Density is compatible to the adjacent zoning districts. 345 c. The proposed zoning conforms to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d. The proposed zoning will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. The properties which are zoned as RSF Single Family Residential are located to the north and northwest of the proposed development site. The development proposal sites the 44-unit apartment building in the southeast corner of the site furthest from these properties which maximizes both distance and planting buffer opportunities. Additionally, the project proposes to gain vehicular access from Highway 41 whereas the adjacent single family residential properties gain access off of local roads. Based on both of these facts the proposed rezoning will not tend to or actually depreciate the area e. The proposed zoning can be accommodated with existing and planned public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f. Traffic generation by the proposed use within the zoning district is within the capabilities of the streets serving the property. The proposed density does not on its own warrant an intersection control modification. However, due to the regional impacts of the Highway 5 reconstruction project, a temporary traffic signal will be installed at the adjacent intersection and will remain in place until a permanent roundabout is constructed in 2028. SITE PLAN REVIEW FINDINGS 6. The Applicant has requested approval of the site plan dated July 11, 2025 prepared by Measure Group, LLC. 7. The zoning ordinance directs the City to consider nine possible adverse effects of the proposed site plan. The nine (9) effects and our findings regarding them are: a) Is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted. Finding: The site plan is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, comprehensive plan, and official road mapping. b) Is consistent with the site plan review requirements. Finding: The site plan is consistent with the site plan review requirements. c) Preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas. 346 Finding: The layout of the proposed structure minimizes affects to the natural resources, sites the proposed building the furthest practicable from adjacent single family properties, and the proposed grading is designed in keeping with Hazeltine Boulevard. d) Creation of a harmonious relationship of buildings and open spaces with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development. Finding: The proposed design creates a harmonious relationship between the building and its natural features through strategic placement. e) Creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: i. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; ii. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; iii. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and iv. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. Finding: The proposed site plan does create an internal sense of order for the buildings and uses on the site through the balance of landscaping, material applications, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles. f) Protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: The site plan as proposed does protect adjacent and neighboring properties for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air that could have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. g) Within the Highway Corridor (HC) districts, consistency with the purpose, intent and standards of the HC districts. Finding: The proposed site plan is not within the Highway Corridor District. 347 h) Within the Bluff Creek Overlay (BCO) district, consistency with the purpose, intent and standards of the BCO district. Finding: The proposed site plan is not within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. i) Maintain an acceptable road system level of service. Finding: The proposed development is consistent with anticipated development of the site. That anticipated development of a residential project up to 8 residential units per acre has been incorporated with the traffic analysis associated with planning for the future roundabout construction between this proposed development site and the adjacent Minnetonka Middle School West property. 8. The planning report Planning Case 2025-11, dated October 8, 2025, prepared by Rachel Arsenault, et al, is incorporated herein. DECISION The City Council approves the Rezoning and Site Plan Review subject to the conditions outlined in the staff report. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this _____ day of _____________, 2025. CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL BY:___________________________________ Its Mayor BY:_ __________________________________ Its City Manager 348 EXHIBIT A Lot 2, Block 1, Beehive Home 2nd Addition. 349 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. ___ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY TO MIXED MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-8) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property in attached Exhibit A from Single-Family Residential (RSF) to Mixed Medium Density Residential District (R-8). Section 2. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of October 2025, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor (Published in _________________ on _______, 2025) 350 2 EXHIBIT A Lot 2, Block 1, Beehive Home 2nd Addition 351 www.transportationcollaborative.com July 21, 2025 Josh McKinney, PLA, Principal Measure Group Subject: Minnewashta Apartments Development Traffic Engineering Support Chanhassen, MN INTRODUCTION TC2 has been engaged to provide traffic engineering support for the proposed Minnewashta Apartments development located at 6440 Hazeltine Road (Hwy 41) in the City of Chanhassen. The proposed development is a 44-unit multifamily development with one (1) access planned to Hazeltine Road (Hwy 41) across from Minnetonka Middle School West. The main objective of this support is to identify the expected trip generation of the proposed development and collaborate with City staff / area agencies to understand potential traffic impacts and timelines associated with the proposed development and Hwy 5 detours planned in the next couple years. The following information provides some preliminary information related to the project. PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC REVIEW A trip generation estimate for the proposed development was created using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, which includes trips for typical weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours, as well as daily. The proposed development, based on the average rate using ITE Code 220 (Multifamily Housing – Low Rise), is estimated to generate 18 a.m. peak hour (4 in / 14 out), 22 p.m. peak hour (14 in / 8 out), and 298 daily (149 in / 149 out) trips. Based on this trip generation, the site would generate about one (1) vehicle trip every three (3) minutes during the peak hours. At this level of trip generation, the change in overall intersection operations of the proposed access is anticipated be minimal. NEXT STEPS TC2 will continue to collaborate with City staff and area agencies to review detour-related information provided to help understand potential traffic impacts and timelines associated with the proposed development and Hwy 5 detours. A subsequent memo will be developed in consultation with City staff and area agencies. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, Matt Pacyna, PE (MN, ND, WI) Transportation Collaborative & Consultants, LLC 352 Metropolitan District Waters Edge Building 1500 County Road B2 West Roseville, MN 55113 An equal opportunity employer MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113 August 8, 2025 Rachael Arsenault Associate Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: MnDOT Review # S25-028 Minnewashta Apartments SW Quad MN 41/Hazeltine Blvd & Donahue Drive Chanhassen, Carver County Dear Ms. Arsenault: Thank you for the opportunity to review the plans for the Minnewashta Apartments. MnDOT has reviewed the documents and has the following comments: Surveys: The site plan should be updated. The dimensions should be added, It appears that the site plan is within Lot 2, block 1, Beehive Home 2nd Addition-but without dimensions is it hard to check against MnDOT right-of-way. Questions regarding these comments should be directed to Jordan Olson, MnDOT Surveys, at jordan.olson@state.mn.us or telephone 651-297-1168. Pedestrian/Bicycle: The current plans don’t appear to show any pedestrian access.MnDOT highly encourages the developer to consider how pedestrians can access the apartments from the existing trails along Hazeltine Blvd. For questions regarding these comments, contact Tristan Trejo, Metro Multimodal, at tristan.trejo@state.mn.us. Water Resources: The increase in water will require a drainage permit. Any projects adjacent to MnDOT Right-of- Way or connecting to MnDOT drainage facilities will require a MnDOT drainage permit to ensure that current drainage rates to MnDOT right -of-way will not be increased. The drainage permit 353 MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113 application, including the information below, should be submitted online to: https://dotapp7.dot.state.mn.us/OLPA/. The following information must be submitted with the drainage permit application: 1) A grading plan showing existing and proposed contours. 2) Drainage area maps for the proposed project showing existing and proposed drainage areas. Any off-site areas that drain to the project area should also be included in the drainage area maps. The direction of flow for each drainage area must be indicated by arrows. 3) Drainage computations for pre and post construction conditions during the 2, 10, and 100 year rain events. 4) Time of concentration calculations. 5) An electronic copy of any computer modeling used for the drainage computations. 6) See also the attached Drainage Permits Checklist for more information. Once a drainage permit application is submitted, a thorough review will be completed and additional information may be requested. Please direct questions concerning drainage issues to Jason Swenson, MnDOT Metro Water Resources at (651-234-7539) or Jason.Swenson@state.mn.us. Permits: As mentioned above a drainage permit may be required. Any other use of, or work within or affecting, MnDOT right of way will require a permit. Permits can be applied for at this site: https://olpa.dot.state.mn.us/OLPA/. Please upload a copy of this letter when applying for any permits. Please direct questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig of MnDOT’s Metro Permits Section at 651-775-0405 or Buck.Craig@state.mn.us. Review Submittal Options MnDOT’s goal is to complete reviews within 30 calendar days. Review materials received electronically can be processed more rapidly. Do not submit files via a cloud service or SharePoint link. In order of preference, review materials may be submitted as: 1. Email documents and plans to metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us. Attachments may not exceed 20 MB (megabytes) per email. Documents can be zipped as well. If multiple emails are necessary, number each email. 2. Files over 20 MB can also be uploaded to MnDOT’s Web Transfer Client site: https://mft.dot.state.mn.us. Contact metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us, and staff will create a shared folder in which files can be uploaded. Please send an accompanying email with a narrative for the development. 354 MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113 If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact me at (651) 234 -7797 or Cameron.muhic@state.mn.us. Sincerely, Cameron Muhic Principal Planner Copy sent via E-Mail: Buck Craig, Permits Mohammad Dehdashti, Design Jason Swenson, Water Resources Almin Ramic, Traffic Bryant Ficek, Area Manager Diane Langenbach, Area Engineer Mohamoud Mire, South Area Support Michael Kowski, Maintenance Tristan Trejo, Multimodal Amrish Patel, Transit Douglas Nelson, Right-of-Way Jordan Olson, Surveys Joe Widing, Metropolitan Council 355 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 16, 2025 CALL TO ORDER: Chair Noyes called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Eric Noyes, Jeremy Rosengren, Ryan Soller, Mike Olmstead, Dave Grover, and Katie Trevena. MEMBERS ABSENT: Vice Chair Steve Jobe STAFF PRESENT: Rachel Arsenault, Associate Planner; Eric Maass, Community Development Director; Joe Seidl, Waters Resource Engineer; and Mackenze Grunig, Project Engineer. PUBLIC PRESENT: John Dragseth 6480 Oriole Rena Dragseth 2600 Forest Gary Bridge 2449 W 64th Street Josh McKinney Measure Group PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. MINNEWASHTA APARTMENTS REZONING AND SITE PLAN REVIEW (PLANNING CASE 25-11) Eric Maass, Community Development Director, reviewed the communications to date for the site plan. He said the public hearing was sent and published in the newspaper as required. Mr. Maass reviewed the land use designation and the zoning districts allowed within that designation; permitted zoning includes a variety of zoning adjacent to the site. He stated that the city had some level of discretion when considering the rezoning request. He said that the present zoning is single-family residential. He stated that any development of the property would require that it be rezoned so that the zoning designation was consistent with the future land use designation within the city’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. He commented that the requested zoning was R-8, which is an eligible district. There are a number of different land uses in the vicinity, and R-8 is compatible with adjacent land uses. He stated that the project, as proposed, is compatible with the R-8 land ordinance. He said that the proposed project is residential in nature; there are 44 units proposed for this project. The adjacent intersection is planned for a roundabout project to be constructed in 2028. He commented that the city has planned for the density of the utilities. He stated that the staff was supportive of the rezoning request. 356 Planning Commission Minutes – September 16, 2025 2 Rachel Arsenault, Associate Planner, said that the city is limited in approving or denying the proposed site plan request based on whether the proposed site plan meets the standards for the zoning ordinance. She said it was a quasi-judicial decision, and she reviewed the nine standards for the site plan. She stated the building location met all the required setbacks. She said that they proposed 44 required spaces on the surface lots in front of the building, but the proposal includes 88 parking spaces in total. She discussed the temporary trail along Highway 41 until the roundabout construction was complete. There are existing trees on the west side of the property to be preserved. She said that they were proposing to plant sixteen trees. Mrs. Arsenault commented that there might be additional buffering required based on the City Council review. She stated that they proposed eight light posts on the property. The stormwater facilities are to be located to the west, and there was a drainage easement that the city could access after the construction of the roundabout. She discussed access for the project. She commented on the site plan renderings and the architectural elevations. The staff reviewed the building height and the building materials. Mackenze Grunig, Project Engineer, discussed the utility tie-in and fire hydrant relocation. He proceeded to discuss traffic, providing information on the planned roundabout project, the conditioned temporary traffic signal, and trips during peak hours. He spoke about the drainage and utility easement the city will receive, as well as the stormwater facilities the developer is proposing to treat additional city water runoff from the roundabout project. He reviewed the construction schedule for 2026 to 2027. Joe Seidl, Water Resource Engineer, discussed the drainage. He reviewed the existing condition and said there was minimal impervious surface with no existing stormwater facilities. He said that the stormwater flows from east to west, and there is one wetland located on the southwestern portion of the site. He said there was a mix of stormwater in the area of the town, including Trunk Highway 41, and private stormwater facilities connected to the city’s system. He said that the development must meet design requirements for both the city and the watershed district. Mr. Seidl looked more broadly at the area, which was built up in the 1980s and 1990s. He said there was limited existing stormwater treatment. He said that there is a stormwater need for this specific development, the roundabout, and future city stormwater needs that are not currently planned. He said that the proposed pond is oversized for treating stormwater. He said that there was an opportunity for stormwater management, such as a regional stormwater facility. He commented that it was an oversized and centralized area to manage stormwater. It was built to take water from other impervious areas, and it would be a partnership between the city and the developer. The developer would build the pond, and the city would help maintain the stormwater pond. He discussed the stormwater prevention plan and stated that the proposed design maintained the water flow patterns. He said that they were looking to see if the roundabout could utilize some of the system being built. He commented that the Project Engineer was looking for ways to enhance the design, such as lowering the elevation where the basin was constructed. He said that if the facilities were built at a lower elevation, it would allow more flexibility. He commented that they wanted to work with the applicant regarding the stormwater. Mrs. Arsenault stated that after reviewing the site plan criteria as designed by the City Code, it would meet the conditions of approval. 357 Planning Commission Minutes – September 16, 2025 3 Mr. Maass reviewed the summary of the rezoning and site plan requests and stated that the staff recommends the approval of both requests. Josh McKinney, Measure Group, said he wanted to highlight a couple of items. He stated that the site is currently zoned as residential single-family, but rezoning is necessary. He said they were looking at a specific project type, but they would be challenged with the sanitary sewer for the location. He said that absent a lift station, the service area was limited. Mr. McKinney said that they were incorporating a significant interstate construction on Highway 41. He said that they wanted as seamless an installation as possible of the roundabout. Mr. McKinney recognized that the product type would adhere to the maximum building height threshold of 35 feet and would locate the building as far as possible from existing structures. He stated that the site had a lot of typography, so the location of the building would be critical. He commented that they were looking at the home-to-home spacing equivalent to a football field. He said that the building is the 35-foot maximum height, but the actual elevation relative to Highway 41 was only five feet taller than Trouvaille, since the building is proposed at the bottom of the hill. He commented that the roundabout function would be improved in the future, so they were trying to optimize the conditions for 2028. He said they were constructing one full leg of the roundabout, and this would assist with the roundabout construction costs. They were trying to provide service for the project and taking on costs that they could bear. They were taking the leg of the roundabout and the stormwater. He discussed that they reviewed the traffic and the roundabout size. He stated that it was a three-story building that would offer amenities for the residents. He commented that they will use high-quality materials for the project. Chair Noyes asked about the traffic and its effect on existing performance. He said that there was a perception that the existing performance is not great for the way it was set up now. Mr. Grunig answered that the current intersection performance was graded at an F. He said that roundabouts were the safest intersection control. Chair Noyes asked about what was dictating the roundabout construction. He asked if there was any way to change the roundabout construction. Mr. Grunig said that Trunk Highway 5 was scheduled for 2026 and 2027. He stated that Highway 41 (Hazeltine Boulevard) is a detour route for additional traffic construction, so they could not construct the roundabout until 2028. Chair Noyes asked if the detour off Trunk Highway 5 changed the analysis. Mr. Grunig answered that the detour was considered as a part of the analysis. Commissioner Olmstead asked about the probability of the temporary signal, as it is a MnDOT decision. Mr. Grunig said it is yet to be final, but the criteria are met to support the installation. Commissioner Trevena discussed current conditions during peak times on the road, specifically with Middle School traffic. She also expressed concern for the safety of the residents and pedestrians. 358 Planning Commission Minutes – September 16, 2025 4 Chair Noyes mentioned that several residents talked about document access. He asked if that had been resolved. Mr. Maass answered that it has been resolved, and if residents have any trouble accessing documents, they can directly reach out to staff for copies. Commissioner Trevena asked about construction in 2028. Staff responded. Commissioner Olmstead asked about where the stormwater system would go from private to public. Mr. Seidl responded to determining the location of what was public and private based on the stormwater. He discussed the stormwater system. Commissioner Grover asked about traveling through the intersection during the roundabout construction. Mr. Grunig replied that there are standard techniques to use to move traffic through roundabout construction. Commissioner Soller asked about the context of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. He said that this lot seems like an outlier, especially butting up to the adjacent properties. He asked if there was context for this lot, when the rest of the neighborhood was residential, single-family, and public/semi-public. He thought it seemed like a strange piece of land, and he asked why it was guided this way in the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Maass answered that the site was likely guided for medium-density residential due to its proximity to adjacent commercial and institutional properties, as well as adjacency to another medium-density residential development. Commissioner Soller said that, as he was looking at the Highway 41 corridor, he said this looked like the last piece of land where the current zoning was not aligned with the land use guidance in the Comprehensive Plan. He asked for confirmation. Mr. Maass answered that he believed so and that he was not aware of any property that was zoned outside of its guidance other than this property. Commissioner Soller stated that this would be the last development in forested space in this area. He said that this was the final stamp of development in this area. Mr. Maass stated that it was a fair assessment. He said that it was five acres, but much of the acreage was not proposed to be used. Commissioner Trevena stated that the proposal seems mindful of neighbors but asked for more information regarding the additional buffering. Mrs. Arsenault responded that they highlighted areas in purple where there could be additional buffering, and that the Planning Commission could condition a recommendation to include specific buffering requirements in those areas. She said they could have city staff review the specific buffering in the areas. Chair Noyes opened the public hearing. John Dragseth, 6480 Oriole, shared his belief that the Planning Commission should recommend the denial of the application. He said that the 2040 Plan did not say that R-8 was okay, but that R-8, R-4, and R-2 were okay. He said that the staff decided that R-8 was okay, but the Planning Commission and City Council must decide what is the correct zoning. He said that the developer 359 Planning Commission Minutes – September 16, 2025 5 doesn’t have the right to R-8. He said that a lot has happened with traffic in the last month, but there was no resolution. He stated that nobody did a traffic study, and in its previous submission, the city staff said the proposal warrants a complete traffic study. He commented that they did not do a traffic study. He said that they heard new things tonight that were not in the proposal. He discussed the intersection, which was important for cars. He said that Herman Field Park crossing is north of the intersection, so traffic would back up through the pedestrian crossing. He discussed concerns about cars passing and not being aware of kids crossing. He said he did not see the regional pond in the application, but he did see it on pages 10 and 11 of the report. He stated that the report took the pond from 4 acres and added almost 8 acres. He said the pond needed to triple in size, but that they could not vote on the finding and fact that the water would be okay. He stated that the city was trying to please a developer with whom they had worked in the past, and that it did not match the neighborhood. He recommended denial. Gary Bridge, 2449 W 64th Street, said he could not find anywhere where a single-family residential neighborhood is located near an apartment complex of this size. He said that they were discussing building an apartment building in a single-family residential oasis. He commented that there is a discrepancy between how it is zoned and what was in the plan. He said the Avienda apartments have been recommended for approval, so he struggled to see the need for the apartment because of the unique property on which it sits. He said that the lot for the apartment sits above the elevation of the neighborhood, so it would be the beacon on the hill for six months of the year. He commented that there would be a significant impact on the traffic. He thought it was ridiculous to have apartment buildings next to homes of such value. Chair Noyes closed the public hearing. Commissioner Trevena asked for further clarification about the traffic signal and what would happen with the crosswalk. She said that there was a significant issue since there were many cars that assumed people were turning onto Chaska Road. She asked if there are any plans near the crosswalk. Mr. Grunig said that the temporary signal would be timed with the intersection of Trunk Highway 7. He said that they were trying to keep traffic flowing southbound freely. Commissioner Rosengren asked what the foot traffic is like, if children are walking along Highway 41, and where they were going. Commissioner Trevena responded that students met their parents at businesses off Chaska Road. They would cross to get to the other side, since the pickup takes about half an hour, so they would meet elsewhere. She said there were students crossing Highway 41 to avoid the long pick-up time. Commissioner Rosengren asked about the traffic studies. He said that the community had figured out a workaround for the traffic situation. He stated that adding a temporary stoplight would not solve the problem. Mr. Grunig answered that a substantial amount of information had been communicated to the middle school. He discussed cars turning right to help with the traffic. He stated that there are a lot of workarounds being used to help with pick-up, including surrounding neighborhood parking. He said that the city was staying within its scope of influence. Commissioner Rosengren said that people would skirt the rules put in place, and there is potential for an accident. 360 Planning Commission Minutes – September 16, 2025 6 Chair Noyes discussed the creation of the roundabout and the requirement for the temporary traffic signal because of the construction. He asked if there was an order that needed to happen. Mr. Grunig discussed the restoration of Trunk Highway 5. He stated that they recommended a traffic signal regardless of the roundabout because of the Trunk Highway 5 project detouring traffic onto Highway 41. Chair Noyes said that they would still have traffic issues at the site. Commissioner Soller asked about the traffic light. Mr. Grunig responded that during the construction with the improvements, the traffic signal alone would reduce the queue wait time for cars leaving the middle school. Commissioner Soller asked about striping at the intersection and how that changed where pedestrians cross Highway 41. Mr. Grunig answered that striping would occur with engineering standards for the intersection. Commissioner Soller asked about opportunities to add a pedestrian-controlled crossing. Mr. Gruning said that his understanding was that there was an opportunity to have a pedestrian crossing at the intersection. Commissioner Soller said that this seemed like an unsafe area, despite what they did with the project. He asked about the net impact on traffic and safety with the proposed project timeline. He asked if that was in the purview of the Planning Commission. He said that there were specific requirements to be met. Chair Noyes said that the traffic situation was bad, but it was almost two independent things that were going to happen. He said that the roundabout had nothing to do with the apartment complex and would not be built until MnDOT said it could be built. He said that their job was to make a decision based on what was in front of them, not if they thought there was a better use for the property. Commissioner Soller said that the approval was contingent on a temporary light. Mr. Maass confirmed this information. Commissioner Soller asked if they could make it contingent on a light and if they could also make it contingent on the roundabout development. Mr. Maass stated that the roundabout was originally planned for construction this summer, but there was a funding shortfall, and the City Engineer secured funding extensions for construction in 2028. Mr. Maass discussed the roundabout construction. He said that the Highway 5 project needs to be completed first, so the roundabout could not be constructed until 2028. Commissioner Rosengren discussed foot traffic on Highway 41. He said that there are no lights there. Mr. Grunig answered that the roundabout would have four pedestrian crossings and provided details about the crossings. 361 Planning Commission Minutes – September 16, 2025 7 Commissioner Rosengren asked if there was an ability to add signals for pedestrians on the roundabout. Mr. Grunig answered that there was a flashing system that could be utilized. Chair Noyes discussed the additional buffering and pedestrian sight lines. Commissioner Olmstead discussed the assurances from the developer and stated that he liked the idea that the stormwater would be improved. Commissioner Soller discussed the zoning for the Bluff Creek Boulevard Pioneer Trail project. He asked if it was rezoned to R-4 or R-8. Mr. Maass clarified that he referred to Pioneer Ridge, which was rezoned to R-8 and another type. Commissioner Soller said that a decision was made regarding buffering on that project. Mr. Maass answered that there are detached townhomes only in a certain area of that development in order to be more similar to the adjacent single-family homes. Commissioner Soller asked if they had any R-8. Mr. Maass answered that it was the attached townhomes near Pioneer Trail. Commissioner Soller asked about the status of the Pioneer Ridge project. Mr. Maass responded that it had received all entitlements. Chair Noyes asked about specific language regarding the additional buffering with the Minnewashta Apartment. Mr. Maass answered that the areas in purple would have additional buffering requirements for the site. Commissioner Trevena discussed buffering and supported the addition. Commissioner Rosengren discussed that it seemed like an unnecessary burden to add all of these projects at similar times. He stated he did not understand why it needed to happen at the same time, and if the development needed to happen at the same time. Commissioner Trevena said she agreed with the staff report and that the staff pulled everything together well. She said the timing was challenging, and she did not know if they approved of it, but they could incorporate a signal and a crosswalk before they moved forward. Commissioner Olmstead asked about Oriole Avenue and if it would ever extend further south. Mr. Maass answered that it was a platted public right-of-way, but the current development proposal does not show the utilization of that additional right-of-way. Commissioner Soller discussed the discretion of the Planning Commission. He said that they determined that R-8 was appropriate zoning for this property. He commented that in his role, the approval seemed appropriate, but if he were in a different role, he might have different opinions. 362 Planning Commission Minutes – September 16, 2025 8 Chair Noyes said that the intersection would not improve if they denied the Planning Case. He stated that there were a lot of moving parts. Commissioner Trevena asked if there was an opportunity to address the crosswalk. Mr. Grunig said that any change would have to be approved by MnDOT since it was their right-of-way. Commissioner Soller asked if they had to put in additional language for the contingencies. Mr. Maass answered that it was noted by staff, but if they wanted it to be abundantly clear, they could put it in the motion. Mr. Maass stated that the agenda item would go to the City Council on October 13. Commissioner Olmstead moved, Commissioner Grover seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission motions to recommend approval of the proposed rezoning ordinance and site plan review, subject to the conditions of approval, and adopt the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. The motion carried with a vote of 4 to 2. Commissioner Trevena and Commissioner Rosengren voted nay. GENERAL BUSINESS: None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED SEPTEMBER 2, 2025 Commissioner Trevena moved, Commissioner Rosengren seconded to approve the Chanhassen Planning Commission summary minutes dated September 2, 2025, as presented. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6-0. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS: None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ORDAINED DISCUSSION Mr. Maass discussed the possible amendments to the ordinance related to accessory structures at the work session meeting on September 22. A public hearing on a proposed ordinance amendment could be held on the October 7 Planning Commission meeting. Chair Noyes asked for the definition of an agricultural property and if there was a minimum or maximum size. Mr. Maass answered that the minimum size is ten acres, and it must be zoned as agriculture, and the use is agriculture for an agriculture building exemption. Commissioner Rosengren asked about how many properties applied. Mr. Maass answered that he could think of two off the top of his head. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION: 363 Planning Commission Minutes – September 16, 2025 9 Mr. Maass stated that the HVAC is not yet fully operational, so he apologized for the heat in the building. Commissioner Soller asked about the acoustics of the room. He stated it felt like there were a lot of echoes, and it was difficult to hear people. Mr. Maass answered that he knew there was work left to be done in the room, but he did not know the specifics. Chair Noyes suggested a sign to encourage speakers to consider the proximity to the microphone. OPEN DISCUSSION: None. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Rosengren moved, Commissioner Soller seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:57 p.m. Submitted by Eric Maass Community Development Director 364 From: To:DL Projects Public Comments Subject:Comments/Opposition to Proposed Minnewashta Apartment Building Date:Tuesday, September 16, 2025 2:40:21 PM I am writing to strongly oppose the proposed Minnewashta apartment building at 6440 Hazeltine Boulevard. As a resident of the Melody Hill neighborhood (directly across Hwy 41 from the proposed development site) and a mother to children attending the neighboring middle school MMW, I have experienced the pitfalls of a heavily overcrowded intersection and adjoining streets. Because of the increase in housing options near the proposed site, as well as the recently added nursing home, the streets in this area are incredibly overcrowded and congested. Additionally, access and enrty to the middle school magnifies this problem exponentially. Residents in our neighborhood have continually complained to the city and the police department about the car, foot, and parking traffic in our neighborhood that occurs every day before and after school and any time there is a middle school event. The safety issues are already highly problematic as cars park on the street, and sometimes even blocking the streets and intersections, while waiting for their children. There have been so many close calls of cars almost hitting each other or hitting a child and we all fear that it is only a matter of time before something tragic happens in this area due to the intense congestion we are already seeing. There have been days when it can take up to 10 mintues to gain access to Highway 41 and often cars default to illegal U-turns or entry points onto the busy highway. These are just some of the reasons for the roundabout that was planned at this intersection. That roundabout has since been cancelled so this problem will now continue to increase. The school has an ever increasing enrollement of out of district students that don't ride busses and need to be dropped off by their parents. Additionally, there continues to be additional housing built within the neighborhood. These factors already make this area far too congested- an additional APARTMENT BUILDING would absolutely push these streets and this area over the edge of what is already a highly problematic area. PLEASE do not allow this development to go forward in an area that is already overly congested. It will have dire consequences for the students walking and driving to this school as well as the familiies living in this neighborhood. Thank you, -- Jessica Tobin Ph.D. Education Policy & Administration 365 From: To:DL Projects Public Comments Cc:Arsenault, Rachel Subject:Request to Continue Minnewashta Apartments Hearing (Case 25-11) Date:Tuesday, September 16, 2025 12:51:54 PM Dear Planning Commission, I respectfully request that the September 16 public hearing for the Minnewashta Apartments (Case 25-11) be continued to a later date. When the August 12 hearing was postponed, the City’s notice stated that additional traffic data would be collected and interim traffic solutions identified with MnDOT prior to the rescheduled meeting. To date, no updated traffic study, new analysis, or interim plan has been made available to the public in the project file. Holding the hearing without this information leaves residents and the Commission unable to meaningfully review or comment on the project’s most critical safety issue: school-hour traffic at Hazeltine Boulevard and the Middle School entrance. Respectfully, I ask that the Commission delay action until: The promised additional traffic data is collected and posted, Interim traffic solutions are presented for public review, and Residents are given adequate time to review these materials before a new hearing. Thank you for considering this request to ensure that the review process is transparent and complete. Sincerely, Aleksey Kerbel 366 From: To:DL Projects Public Comments Subject:Proposed Apartments across from MMW Date:Tuesday, August 12, 2025 4:11:50 PM I am not in favor of the proposed apartment project at 6440 Hazeltine Blvd. As a parent of several MMW students, it is already a traffic nightmare to get in and out of MMW all daytime hours. Thank you! Kiirsten Rakers Get Outlook for iOS 367 From: To:DL Projects Public Comments Subject:Public Comment – Minnewashta Apartments 6440 Hazeltine Blvd Date:Tuesday, August 12, 2025 10:37:46 AM Dear Planning Commission Members, I am writing to strongly oppose the proposed Minnewashta Apartments project at 6440 Hazeltine Blvd (Hwy 41), directly next to Minnetonka Middle School West. My primary concern is that a high-turnover, 44-unit apartment complex in this location will bring residents who are far less likely to be long-term, vested members of our community. Our neighborhood is built on relationships, shared investment in schools, parks, and safety, and the stability of property ownership. This project, as proposed, undermines that stability. Aesthetics and neighborhood fit are also a major issue. Placing a large, multi-story rental complex along a prominent stretch of Hwy 41 so close to the school will significantly alter the visual character of the area. It will also set a precedent for more high-density projects on this corridor. The current RSF zoning exists for a reason, and this rezoning to R-8 high-density is not compatible with the surrounding single-family homes, the school, and the senior care facility. Beyond these primary concerns, there are procedural and planning gaps that should prevent approval at this stage: 1. Incomplete and inaccessible public documents – Several pre-application materials have been unavailable online due to “technical errors” since June 11. Minnesota law requires meaningful public access before a hearing. This hearing should be continued until all files are posted and the public has had a full review period. 2. Traffic, parking, and access conflicts – The only access point for the project is directly opposite the middle school driveway at a new roundabout. The traffic memo provided is not a full impact study and fails to assess school drop-off and pick-up congestion, pedestrian safety, and cumulative impacts from current road work detours. The middle school already experiences major congestion at dismissal, with vehicles often lined up along Chaska Road. While this project may not directly increase congestion on Chaska Road itself, it will add significant traffic into the complex’s entrance during peak school times. With only 88 garage stalls for 44 units and limited visitor parking, overflow is likely to 368 spill into nearby lots, including the memory care facility. This increases the potential for conflict between school traffic and apartment traffic at the roundabout and shared approach. 3. Wetland and environmental review – The application acknowledges wetlands on the site, yet no current delineation or functional assessment is provided. The existing wetland decision is from 2017 and is outdated for 2025 permitting. A new delineation and agency concurrence are required before approval. 4. Stormwater and groundwater risks – The stormwater plan relies heavily on a single surface basin with unclear freeboard and discharge point compliance. Geotechnical borings indicate possible groundwater interaction and unstable soils, yet the current geotechnical report is incomplete and lacks seasonal data. Given the lack of complete information, the incompatibility with existing neighborhood character, and the long-term risk to community cohesion, I urge the Planning Commission to deny the rezoning request or at minimum continue the hearing until: All application materials are accessible for public review for the required notice period. A full, independent traffic study is conducted during school-year peak hours. A current wetland delineation, environmental review, and updated geotechnical report are submitted and reviewed. A detailed parking and overflow management plan is provided. Approving a high-density rental complex at this sensitive location without resolving these issues would be premature and contrary to the long-term interests of Chanhassen residents. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Luke Steck 6239 Chaska Rd 369 From: To:DL Projects Public Comments Subject:Minnewashta apartments Date:Tuesday, August 12, 2025 9:08:37 AM Good morning, I’m writing about the proposed Minnewashta Apartment complex across from MMW. This is already a ridiculously congested intersection and the increased traffic will only make it worse and more dangerous. As a Chanhassen resident, this is a very unwelcome development in our community. Regardless of what happens, I hope you’ll also consider replacing the cross walk lights near MMW to be something significantly more noticeable. Those tiny lights that are there now rarely get drivers’ attention early enough- I’ve seen many close calls with e-bikers, bikers walkers trying to cross there. Thanks for your consideration, Melanie Winters Asset 23.png 370 From: To:von Oven, Mark; Kimber, Josh; McDonald, Jerry; Schubert, Haley; Ryan, Elise; DL City Council; DL Projects Public Comments Subject:Proposed 44 unit bldg on HWY 41! Date:Tuesday, August 12, 2025 7:58:07 AM Hello! I am writing as a resident Washta Bay Road on Highway seven just a half mile west of Highway 41. I have major concerns about the proposed four units building going in off of Highway 41 directly across from Minnetonka middle school West. As a mom of four children, three of them which will be in middle school this year this is a horrible idea to build another structure on that 2 lane road that's already traffic ridden. The construction to put in new piping at the end of the school year last year caused major difficulties getting in and out of the school parking lot, it was extremely dangerous for the children to be walking to school as many of them do from surrounding neighborhoods. What usually is approximately a 10 minute round-trip for me to drive them from home drop them at school and get back home was sometimes taking 35 minutes and multiple days at the end of the school year. We were late due to the amount of traffic we faced, trying to turn onto 41 and then off of 41 into the middle school parking lot With a large building being built. I can only imagine there would be many more traffic challenges during the building process. Beyond that on a normal day, driving to middle school or walking to middle school traffic during your typical rush- hour period is increasingly getting worse as 41 is very congested. We cannot handle the traffic of other vehicles coming in and out of a potential shared lot with the memory care facility. School takes up a solid nine months out of the year, so this isn't a small issue for a small bit of time each year. Furthermore, there are plans to shut down a decent portion of Highway five and a lot of that traffic will be pushed on the highway 41 to then go west on Highway seven. This summer there was a substantial accident just outside of the Arboretum on Highway five closing it down during rush-hour in the evening. The time it took me from Highway five and 41 to get down to Highway seven and 41 was 33 minutes, 33 minutes for that short stretch of road. We simply cannot handle the traffic on 41 and on highway seven in the first place as is there's no way those roads and the people around it want to deal with that kind of traffic on a daily basis during the construction process and added traffic, it will bring after. For multiple reasons, I am highly opposed to this building going up. Something needs to be done about these roadways. We were told there would be a roundabout and are now told there won't be because the city doesn't have the budget for it. Trying to add this building so that some investor will give you the money to build that roundabout null and voids the roundabout with the additional traffic. Jessica Dronen 2851 Washta Bay Rd., Excelsior 55331 Sent from my iPhone 371 From: To:DL Projects Public Comments Subject:Public Comment – Minnewashta Apartments 6440 Hazeltine Blvd Date:Tuesday, August 12, 2025 7:46:23 AM Dear Planning Commission Members, I am writing to formally request that no approvals for the proposed Minnewashta Apartments at 6440 Hazeltine Blvd move forward until critical concerns are addressed. This project is directly across from Minnetonka Middle School West and next to a Memory Care facility. The intersection is already congested during school drop-off and pick-up. Adding a 44-unit apartment building with only 88 parking stalls will inevitably lead to overflow parking on nearby private lots and along Hazeltine Blvd, creating safety risks for students and residents. A full independent traffic study that accounts for current detours and real school-year traffic patterns must be completed and made public. The site also contains a wetland. As the stormwater report confirms, altering this wetland will permanently remove its flood control, water quality, and habitat benefits. Once a wetland is disturbed, these protections cannot be restored. The public deserves a transparent and thorough environmental review, not just a developer-funded report. Some pre-application city documents tied to this project, specifically 250522 SD and 25006 Headwaters Chanhassen Apartments 250204 (3), have been posted since June 11 but remain inaccessible online due to a “technical error.” These are supposed to be public records, yet residents have not had the required time to review them. I urge the Planning Commission to delay any approvals until: 1. All project documents are made accessible and residents have adequate time to review them. 2. A traffic study by an independent firm is completed and considers actual school-year traffic. 3. A full environmental review is conducted, with public input, on the wetland impacts and stormwater plan. Given the number of unresolved issues, I do not understand how this proposal has progressed to this stage. I strongly urge the Commission to require these steps before any further action. 372 Sincerely, Aleksey Kerbel, Chanhassen, MN 373 From: To:DL Projects Public Comments Subject:Apartment Complex Date:Monday, August 11, 2025 8:56:02 PM Hello, I won’t be able to attend but I am not in favor of the apartment complex near the middle school. I’m not in favor of the project because it will bring high-density traffic, strain local infrastructure, and change the small-town character of the community. Kind regards, Martim Quayat Sent from my iPhone 374 From: To:DL Projects Public Comments Subject:Minnewashta Apartments Date:Thursday, August 7, 2025 7:25:08 PM I won't be able to attend the public hearing but would like to submit a comment: As someone who lives in Chanhassen near Hwy 41, it's plain to see that this road has become overloaded to the point of being useless and at times dangerous. Any further development along this road- especially an apartment complex- would be irresponsible without first fixing the current traffic situation. -Charlie Marshik 375 From: To:DL Projects Public Comments Subject:NO TO PROPOSAL TO BUILD APARTMENTS ON HWY 41!!!!! Date:Wednesday, August 6, 2025 12:14:52 PM I just saw the sign on Hwy 41 across from the Middle School concerning the proposed building of an apartment complex. I AM TOTALLY AGAINST THIS IDEA!!!! WHO THINKS ADDING MORE TRAFFIC TO AN ALREADY DANGEROUS ROAD WITH CARS TURNING IN TO THE SCHOOL AND KIDS WALKING ACROSS THE HIGHWAY IS A GOOD IDEA????? THIS IS A TERRIBLE IDEA. My daughter's family lives in the cul-du-sac behind that property and adding all of these units will make the neighborhood much busier and unsafe for the young kids. Is this low-income housing? If so, I am completely dumbfounded by this. I never received information on the meetings regarding this project but have added August 12 to my calendar. I will speak out AGAINST THIS INSANE IDEA. Whoever is in charge of this project needs to respond to my concerns and explain the ridiculous proposal. Keep this land OPEN!!!!! Paula Evanich 376 From: Katie Fisher < Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 8:18:57 AM To: von Oven, Mark <mvonoven@chanhassenmn.gov>; Kimber, Josh <jkimber@chanhassenmn.gov>; Ryan, Elise <eryan@chanhassenmn.gov>; McDonald, Jerry <jmcdonald@chanhassenmn.gov>; Schubert, Haley <hschubert@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Opposition to Proposed Apartment Building Adjacent to My Home Dear City of Chanhassen, I hope you're doing well. I'm writing to formally express my opposition to the proposed construction of an apartment building next to my home at 6461 Oriole Ave. While I understand the need for responsible development, I have deep concerns about the potential impact this project wi ll have on our neighborhood and local environment. This type of development raises a number of serious issues, including: • Environmental impact – The construction and long-term operation of a large apartment building could disrupt local ecosystems, reduce green space, and increase pollution and runoff in the area. • Wildlife disruption – The area around my home is home to various species of birds and small wildlife. Increased construction and human activity may displace or endanger these animals. • School crowding – Our local schools are already operating near or at capacity. A large influx of new residents could place additional strain on the school system, affecting class sizes and resource availability. • Increased taxes – New developments often lead to rising property taxes and infrastructure costs, which would unfairly burden current residents. • Quality of life – The increase in traffic, noise, and population density would significantly alter the quiet, residential character of our neighborhood and reduce privacy for nearby homeowners. For all these reasons, I respectfully ask that this project be reconsidered or relocated to a more suitable area. I also ask to be kept informed of any public hearings or meetings regarding this development so I may participate and make my voice heard. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Kathrine Fisher 6461 Oriole Ave, Excelsior, MN 55331 -- Katie Fisher KaJo Inscriptions 377 From: To:DL Projects Public Comments; von Oven, Mark; Kimber, Josh; McDonald, Jerry; Schubert, Haley; Ryan, Elise Subject:Fw: Opposition to Proposed 44-Unit Apartment Development Near School and Residential Area at 6440 Hazeltine Boulevard Date:Tuesday, August 5, 2025 1:17:54 PM Members of the City Council; With the intent to reduce the amount of input to read through, I wanted to share that I concur with all of the concerns/details in the email below. We have resided at this address (2444 W 64th Street) for 22 years and are neighbors of the sender below , We also have concerns about the impact this project will have on our neighborhood and local environment if implemented. The proposed development raises serious concerns as described in the below email. Local ecosystems will be impacted; green space will be reduced and this proposed development would increase environmental pollution and runoff. Displacement and endangerment of wildlife will also be impacted due to increased human presence, consumption & crowding. Local schools are already strained and this will further impact resources and class sizes. Property taxes and infrastructure costs would burden current residents. Traffic, which is already insanely busy and reckless, and the road infrastructure overwhelmed as it is, the proposed location of this development would highly impact the school zone which with vehicle and foot traffic putting our children at (greater) risk when leaving the school grounds. We respectfully request consideration of a more suitable area for the proposed development. Kelly & Wayne Peterson ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Carrie Miller <> Date: Tue, Aug 5, 2025, 10:48 Subject: Opposition to Proposed 44-Unit Apartment Development Near School and Residential Area at 6440 Hazeltine Boulevard To: <projectcomments@chanhassenmn.gov>, <mvonoven@chanhassenmn.gov>, <jkimber@chanhassenmn.gov>, <jmcdonald@chanhassenmn.gov>, <hschubert@chanhassenmn.gov>, <eryan@chanhassenmn.gov> To the Honorable Members of the City Council: I am writing as a concerned resident of 2445 W 64th St, regarding the proposed construction 378 of a 44-unit apartment building near Minnetonka Middle School West, directly adjacent to a heavily trafficked and already dangerous intersection. I respectfully urge you to reconsider or halt this development for the following reasons: 1. Traffic Congestion and Safety Risks The proposed site is located near an intersection that is already known to be busy and hazardous, especially during school drop-off and pick-up hours. The addition of potentially 88 or more vehicles (assuming two per unit) will drastically increase congestion. This poses a serious risk to children walking or biking to school, as well as to school buses and local traffic navigating tight or poorly controlled turns. Traffic at this intersection already exceeds safe levels during peak hours. Emergency vehicle access could also be impeded, compromising public safety. 2. Incompatibility with Rural and Residential Character The proposed development sits directly beside a quiet, single-family residential neighborhood and is entirely out of scale with the area’s rural charm and low-density character. The introduction of high-density housing: Undermines the planning integrity of this neighborhood. Sets a precedent for further high-density development in areas that are not zoned or prepared for it. Disrupts the peaceful quality of life that current residents have invested in and expect to maintain. 3. Environmental and Infrastructure Strain High-density developments place increased strain on local infrastructure, including: Water, sewage, and stormwater management systems, which may not be adequately equipped to support such an influx. Public services, such as waste collection, snow removal, and utility maintenance, which will face new burdens without corresponding funding or expansion. 4. School Capacity and Child Safety Concerns An influx of new residents will likely increase enrollment pressure on nearby schools, which are already operating at capacity. Additionally: Increased vehicle traffic during school hours heightens the risk of accidents. Limited crosswalks, signage, and patrols near the school will not suffice to protect the larger 379 number of children expected in the area. 5. Lack of Community Input Many residents feel this project has moved forward without adequate community engagement or transparency. Large-scale changes to a neighborhood should not be made without thoroughly considering and addressing local voices. We ask that a full traffic impact study, environmental impact assessment, and community hearing be conducted before any approval is granted. Conclusion We are not against responsible development. However, this particular project is inappropriate for the location proposed and would fundamentally alter the safety, character, and livability of our community. We urge the council to: Deny or pause approval of this project. Reevaluate zoning in this area. Require further studies and community consultation. Thank you for your time and dedication to our community. We trust that you will prioritize the safety, integrity, and well-being of the families who live here. Sincerely, Justin and Carrie Miller 2445 W 64th St, Excelsior, MN 55331 On behalf of concerned residents of the local neighborhood near W 64th St and Oriole Ave 380 381 without nearby apartment buildings. That decision was based on past experience. We previously lived in a neighborhood that welcomed apartment complexes with high rent—and I watched that area change dramatically. It became unsafe for kids to play outside. I found children from the apartments having sex in my yard while waiting for the school bus. I witnessed drug use, physical fights, and a sharp rise in theft and car break-ins. My own son was threatened with violence while playing in our front yard. This isn’t speculation, it’s reality. Data clearly shows that higher density and renter-occupied housing is associated with increased rates of property and violent crime. What are the benefits of this apartment complex to our community—especially to our students? There is a well-documented difference between owner-occupied and renter-occupied neighborhoods. Renter-heavy areas tend to have higher turnover, weaker community ties, and less resident investment. This undermines the kind of supervision and neighborhood stability that’s essential for our children’s development. Studies show: Renters are less likely to attend PTA meetings, vote in local elections, or engage in long- term community improvement efforts. Children in owner-occupied homes have higher test scores, better attendance, fewer behavioral problems, and lower dropout and teen birth rates. Owner-occupied neighborhoods tend to have stronger social cohesion, leading to lower crime and better youth behavior outcomes. These aren’t just studies—they reflect the real-world consequences of neighborhood design on families, schools, and child well-being. I have some direct questions that deserve answers: 1. Would you approve an apartment complex in your own backyard? 2. Would you feel comfortable with increased traffic where your own children walk to and from school? 3. What specific actions are you taking to address the additional traffic and safety issues this project will create? This area already experiences heavy traffic during school drop-off and pickup, as well as after- school sports and evening/weekend events. Adding this dense residential complex will only make an already dangerous situation worse for pedestrians and student drivers. I’m extremely disappointed that this project is even being considered and I ask that you revisit this decision with full transparency and a genuine commitment to the long-term safety and character of our community. Please use this land for something that will enhance and not harm our neighborhood. I strongly urge you to say no to renter-occupied apartments and reconsider the location of this building, especially given the safety risks associated with high-turnover, renter-dominated housing near a middle school. Thank you for your time and consideration. 382 Sincerely, Jessica Johnson 2742 Piper Ridge Ln Parent of a student at MMW 383 From: Hokkanen, Laurie <lhokkanen@chanhassenmn.gov> Sent: Monday, August 4, 2025 7:57 AM To: Maass, Eric <emaass@chanhassenmn.gov>; Arsenault, Rachel <rarsenault@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Fwd: Planning Commission Meeting- Aug 12th- Minnewashta Apartments Begin forwarded message: From: Keri Burton Date: August 4, 2025 at 7:40:14 AM CDT To: "von Oven, Mark" <mvonoven@chanhassenmn.gov>, "Kimber, Josh" <jkimber@chanhassenmn.gov>, "McDonald, Jerry" <jmcdonald@chanhassenmn.gov>, "Schubert, Haley" <hschubert@chanhassenmn.gov>, "Ryan, Elise" <eryan@chanhassenmn.gov>, DL City Council <Council@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Re: Planning Commission Meeting- Aug 12th- Minnewashta Apartments Hello Mayor Ryan and Members of the Chanhassen City Council, I wanted to reach out regarding concerns about recently hearing of the possibility of a 44 unit apartment building going in across from MMW. I live in Chanhassen, in Minnewashta Manor, behind North Coop. 384 As a fellow business owner, I am all for businesses and know of the need we have for housing, but as a neighbor to the area, and mom to kids at MMW, I have the following concerns: 1) It is already well known, and well documented, that traffic is a problem in and around MMW, how would adding more traffic to the area help the students to be safer? 2) In an email update from Mayor Ryan on May 23rd it was communicated that the roundabout bid came in higher than expected and there was a funding gap. In the "Neighborhood Open House" hosted by Headwaters Development on July 30th (barely 2 months later) and just 3 days ago, it was communicated to neighbors present that the roundabout would be going in, but not until 2028, and that the roundabout would make the traffic issue better for students. My main question to Headwaters Development- If in fact the roundabout had now been approved, you are going off of subjective study and data that the roundabout would help. Plans can not account for all variables. If you are so confident it will help, build your apartment AFTER the roundabout goes in because the safety of students is at stake. It was communicated to parents that the new parking lot at MMW was going to significantly improve traffic and what, $1.5 million later, how much has been improved? You have a tough job of keeping students safe at MMW with the traffic as it already is....but help me to understand how this apartment, whether the roundabout goes in or not, would help the students to be safer? 3) As a mentioned above, I am all for business! I love growth and I know the need for housing. At that intersection we have 2 groups of vulnerable people, a memory care center and a school with children who walk that road all the time. How will adding an apartment building to this site help both of these groups of people be safer than they already are with the horrible traffic patterns? 4) Headwaters Development stated that based on their research the busy traffic patterns of AM drop off at MMW and afternoon pick up of MMW will not be affected by their building, because the traffic patterns of their residents 385 are different than the school times. Have you ever tried to pick up a student in the spring after track and tennis practice is done? Or tried to get out of the parking lot after Open House, or a choir concert, or some other MMW event where the lot is full? Or when the lot is full due to soccer events and tournaments on the weekends? I appreciate data and research, but it's just that, data on a paper there is no way to feel confident the data is correct and will truly be accurate in keeping students safer? 5) Finally, Headwaters Development, mentioned all the road construction going on around the area in the upcoming years and how traffic would be re- routed to Hwy 41. And with all the construction traffic from the apartment development too in the next 1-2 years, how is this all going to keep students more safe??? You probably don't have a lot of control over the re-routing of construction traffic, but you do have control over the approval of this apartment building. In closing, I propose that at a minimum the approval of this building is postponed for a few years, until as a city council, you are convinced that our students will be safer with the addition of the roundabout that Headwaters Development mentioned has been approved. Thank you, Keri Burton 2701 Piper Ridge Lane, Excelsior 386 1 Arsenault, Rachel From:Josh McKinney <jmckinney@measuregrp.com> Sent:Tuesday, July 22, 2025 2:10 PM To:Arsenault, Rachel; Maass, Eric Subject:Fwd: 6440 Hazeltine apartment complex FYI. Resident communication/response. To help p otect you p vacy M c osoft Offce p evented automatc download of th s pictu e f om the Inte net Josh McKinney, PLA Principal Phone: 612-440-0934 Mobile: 605-310-9766 jmckinney@measuregrp.com ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Kathleen H <> Date: Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 1:58 PM Subject: Re: 6440 Hazeltine apartment complex To: Josh McKinney <jmckinney@measuregrp.com> That all makes sense! I think it’s great to study the worst case scenario—I was surprised how quickly the roundabout project was deferred this year after years of work and studies, etc. Thanks so much for all of your communication and information and good luck moving forward! Kathleen Sent from my iPhone On Jul 22, 2025, at 1:34 PM, Josh McKinney <jmckinney@measuregrp.com> wrote: Kathleen- You're very welcome! The last I had heard, and what the council has heard at a recent work session, is that the grants and state funding are secured (I believe I heard through 2029) and would be 387 2 available for the roundabout project. There may also be other sources of funding that become available between now and then. We believe there will ultimately be a permanent intersection improvement at 41 and the Middle School. Our traffic consultant is studying the "worst case scenario" of a no-build condition and what our impacts are to the road network if no improvements are constructed. The results of that study, in coordination with the City engineering staff, will ultimately determine if the project is feasible without the roundabout. I hope that answered your question, please let me know if you have any others that come up. Thanks, -Josh To help p otect you p vacy M c osoft Offce p evented automatc download of th s pictu e f om the Inte net Josh McKinney, PLA Principal Phone: 612-440-0934 Mobile: 605-310-9766 jmckinney@measuregrp.com On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 1:04 PM Kathleen H <> wrote: Thanks for your reply! I was hoping maybe the addition of an apartment complex would help contribute to a solution in this area. Is the city saying a roundabout is slated for construction in 2028 now? I would be very curious about how they will be funding that since the school funding and grant money they were going to use in addition to their own contribution may or may not be available by that time. I know the grant was set to expire and I’m sure the school has their own process for approving something like that again and new budget constraints. I can always connect with the city if that’s outside of your scope. I’m assuming that the project would move forward with or without the roundabout at that intersection? Thanks again, Kathleen Heimermann Sent from my iPhone 388 3 On Jul 22, 2025, at 11:49 AM, Josh McKinney <jmckinney@measuregrp.com> wrote: Hi Kathleen- Thank you very much for your message. The project team is aware of the challenges with the traffic in that area and have been working with the City to mitigate our impact to the existing condition while planning for the future roundabout, now slated for construction in 2028. To specifically answer your question, our project is proposing to improve the western leg of the future roundabout, along with install ponding which will benefit nearly 5 acres of off-site drainage, including the roundabout and parts of the school. Those two design features, along with some other improvements, will help the City close the funding gap experienced this spring. We understand a traffic issue exists during peak times at the Middle School. A few things to consider:  The peak usage times for the school and peak usage times for our project do not overlap.  The proposed project will not be fully occupied until late spring/summer of 2027 at the earliest.  We would like to construct the project prior to the roundabout completion in 2028 to avoid the potential of damaging the new pavement and curbs with heavy machinery  We can communicate with our residents the traffic constraints through the summer of 2028. While working & living in an area of active construction is not ideal, the overlap of those activities is small relative to the commitment of being a part of the community for the long term.  As mentioned, our project ultimately helps facilitate the roundabout improvements via cost sharing for items otherwise paid for by the money allocated for the roundabout. I am happy to share the meeting materials with you and update you after next Wednesday, along with any sort of consensus that area residents provide if that would be of interest to you. Thanks again for reaching out! Josh 389 4 To help p otect you p ivacy M c osoft Offce p evented au omatc download of this pic u e f om the Inte net Josh McKinney, PLA Principal Phone: 612-440-0934 Mobile: 605-310-9766 jmckinney@measuregrp.com On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 8:51 AM Kathleen H <> wrote: We live in the area of a proposed apartment complex and our children attend the middle school there. Unable to attend the meeting, but wondering if there’s anything you’ll be doing to help contribute to the traffic and pedestrian in that area? A roundabout was suppose to go at that intersection. The chanhassen city council has recently voted not to pursue it because of a funding shortfall after the bid came in. You can read about that here. https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/government/projects/state- highway-projects/th41-minnetonka-middle-school-west-intersection- improvements MNDOT will not allow a traffic light there. It’s nearly impossible to turn out of the middle school already at peak traffic times Even in the summer the traffic down Hwy 41 backs up quite a ways. Will your entrance/exit be Hwy 41? You will have a lot of complaints from your residents in the complex who try to exit. Thanks for any insight you can share on this issue. Kathleen Heimermann Sent from my iPhone 390 1 John A. Dragseth – 6480 Oriole Avenue, Chanhassen, MN 55331 August 9, 2025 Via e-mail @ emaass@chanhassenmn.gov (published contact for Planning Commission) RE: Comments on Proposed Minnewashta Apartments Development Dear Members of the Chanhassen Planning Commission: I own property just off the Northwest corner of the proposed “Minnewashta Apartments” development (“the Development”) that you are scheduled to consider at your August 12 mee/ng. I write because the Development is inconsistent with proper zoning, and Developer’s applica/on contains a fundamental misrepresenta/on. The only proper approach for the Commission/Council is to deny the applica/on and permit the Developer to apply for R-4 zoning. That would provide the Developer with a zoning increase from single-family residen/al (SFR) to R-4, which is fully consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. It would avoid unreasonably and illegally jumping the zoning of the property mul/ple levels (from SFR to R- 8) and would avoid the SuperMax approach the Developer has taken within R-8, which pushes to the maximum (and beyond) every relevant project parameter, i.e., number of units, water use, steepness of slope, structure height, and traffic danger. Just one example (discussed in more detail below) shows a view from behind a 6-foot man facing East and standing at the lot line between Herman Field Park and the SuperMax project, looking up the ~43- foot-high hill at the ~45-foot-high (four-story) West wall of the building: 391 2 The Developer wants you to put this giant beast on a property that is currently zoned single-family residen/al. It is a property that abuts single-family lots that the current owners purchased before the Comprehensive Plan opened any possibility of higher zoning. I and other neighbors do not demand that the property be kept single-family residen/al, but we fairly expect a reasonable middle ground, and there is no legal reason for the Commission to accept the Developer’s SuperMax approach. There are, in contrast, many reasons Developer’s applica/on should be, and must be, rejected under the law. I address par/cular problems with the Developer’s proposal next. Developer Gives Only a False Premise for R-8, so the Commission Cannot Go R-8 An applicant that seeks to obtain a property right from the government, at the expense of others, bears the burden of providing evidence and reasoning for why it should be given such a privilege. Here, Developer’s request is a rezoning from SFR, up mul/ple levels, to R-8. From my review of Developer’s filings with the city, I see a single explana/on, and that is that the Developer asserts it has the “right” to 44 units. Specifically, Developer states, in its “Minnewashta Apartments SubmiEal Narra/ve”: The Residen/al Medium Density guidance allows up to 44 units by right. Developer’s asseron is crically and demonstrably false . And it is the central reason the applica/on must be denied (not merely should be denied). A simple review of the city’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan shows this. Specifically, the Plan explicitly says that the various “Residen/al – Medium Density” areas on the plan map (which is what the map marks the Development property as) can be R-4, RLM, R-8, or PUD-R. It is up to the City Council to iden/fy which of these is proper in each area, not for a Developer to dictate which. Developer can get 44 units only by presen/ng evidence and reasoning that R-8 is the proper zoning, and by the City Council accep/ng that. Developer has provided only its one-sentence asser/on, which is false. Developer has provided no evidence, discussion, or reasoning to get an R-8. The city cannot back-fill evidence or argument for Developer, so the applica/on must be denied because Developer’s only reason is a faulty reason.1 The wording of Developer’s asser/on implies that it could take legal ac/on if it is not given its “right” to a 44-unit SuperMax apartment. Just the opposite. On the current record, the Commission and City Council cannot legally give Developer R-8 zoning, and doing so would open the city to legal liability. I discuss in the next sec/on why R-4 is the only proper choice here for upward re-zoning, but the Commission need not and cannot get there because Developer chose only a terse legally-improper ground for its R-8 SuperMax approach. A semi-judicial administra/ve body like a City Council (or a 1 More generally, to my understanding, a Comprehensive Plan cannot compel anything. It is instead a document that discusses goals, and it is then up to a city council to amend its City Code to codify any goals it deems sufficiently important. See Zoning Guide for Ci/es, at 2-4 (League of Minnesota Ci/es July 26, 2024) (available at hEps://www.lmc.org/wp-content/uploads/documents/Zoning-Guide-for-Ci/es.pdf). Cf. Chanhassen City Code Sec. 20-110. Developer has not cited the Chanhassen City Code on Zoning or provided any reason from that code that it has a “right” to R-8 and 44 units, and its applica/on must be denied as a maEer of law for that reason also. 392 3 Planning Commission suppor/ng a City Council) cannot sua sponte provide evidence and ra/onale for a zoning selec/on that an applicant never provided. R-8 is the Wrong Zoning Even Apart from Developer’s Failure of Proof A neighbor is not required to prove the proper zoning when a Developer fails to do so. But to help the Commission, I’ll try. In par/cular, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan hammers home that R-8 is a wrong zoning for this property:  It Jumps Mul1ple Levels, and Doesn’t Transi1on: The Comprehensive Plan’s “Land Use” sec/on emphasizes: “Transi/ons should be created between different land uses. The more incompa/ble the land uses, the more important the transi/on zone.” A SuperMax R-8 solu/on is not a “transi/on” at all from SFR—it is an at-least-two-step jump in zoning that is surrounded by quieter/lesser uses. Even worse, it is a maximized (SuperMax) use of R-8. It s/cks out; it does not transi/on.  It’s inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s Defini1on for Medium Density Proper1es: In the Comprehensive Plan’s defini/on of “Residen/al—Medium Density” (at page 32), the Plan states: “Medium density areas ae used to create transi/onal zones between [a] low-density residen/al and [b] commercial, office, or high-density residen/al areas.” The Development here is surrounded by (a) single-family on the North and East, (b) single-story school on East, (c) parks on the South and West, and (d) the single-story Trouvaille Memory Care on the North. The Development is a much, much higher-intensity use than any of its neighbors—contrary to the Comprehensive Plan’s requirement that it by a transion between single-family and a higher use.  It’s Unprecedented: I’ve pored over the Chanhassen Zoning map and cannot find another loca/on where SFR jumps to R-8, let alone where an R-8 was created from an exis/ng SFR zoning. Historically, R-8 zoning appears to have been used for single-story senior homes—i.e., the BeeHive/Trouvaille memory care next to the Development and Elysian Senior Homes in the SW part of the city. And even Elysian is single-story, next to apartments rather than SFR, and buffered by lots of trees: And cri/cally, such dense apartment housing is not seen outside the city’s Central Business District. This makes perfect sense from a planning perspec/ve, because zoning types should 393 4 change gradually, such that one level of zoning does not offend its neighbor by being too different.  It Violates the Comprehensive Plan’s Requirement to Maintain the Aesthe1c of Single-Family Areas: In Sec/on 1.7.1 on “Land Use,” the 2040 Comprehensive Plan list the goals of: “Support low-density residen/al development in appropriate areas of the community in such a manner as to maintain the aesthe/c exis/ng single-family areas, and to create new neighborhoods of similar character and quality. Designate sufficient land to provide for a wide spectrum of housing. Adequate land should be set aside for medium and high-density land uses.” Taken together, these goals point to not having this property be mul/ple zoning steps above its residen/al neighbors (R-8), but something that fits with the residen/al (R-4).  It Violates the Comprehensive Plan’s Requirement to “Preserve Natural Slopes,” to the Harm of Neighboring Single-Family Proper1es: Under “Natural Resources” in the Comprehensive Plan, the first policy is to “Preserve natural slopes wherever possible.” Directly contrary to this policy, the SuperMax nature of the Development radically increases slopes in the NW corner of the property to maximum values (33.3%), and that is where private neighbors are located downhill from the Development (which I discuss in more detail below).  It’s An Extreme Change Without Buffer: Sec/on 2.13.1 of the Comprehensive Plan, on “Buffer Yard Concept,” states that buffers should be used between areas of different usage. The SuperMax apartment towers over the Dog Park, and Herman Field Park, and is not buffered at all (see below).  It’s Inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s Transit Goals: The 2040 Comprehensive Plan notes that developments will be reviewed based on their ability to make use of mass transit resources. No one in this apartment building is going to use transit—i.e., Metro Transit’s own map shows it is in a mass transit desert (with the Developed in red/yellow) and mass transit miles away at the very top, very boEom, and very East edge of the map: That simply highlights that a large apartment building is out-of-place in this loca/on, and belongs in or near a commercial/urban area.  It’s Inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s Traffic Plan: The 2040 Comprehensive Plan, in Sec/on 1.7.5 on “Transporta/on,” notes the importance of discouraging development in roadway corridors, especially principal arterials. That is because it’s dangerous for cars to just pull onto a principal arterial. (For example, that is why interstate highways have only long entry ramps.) But highway 41 is one of the few roads in Chanhassen designated as a “principal 394 5 arterial,” see Chanhassen City Code, so indiscriminately adding 44 units that would pull right onto it is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan.  It’s Inconsistent With Site History: When the city council permiEed the next-door memory care facility a decade ago (Bee Hive, née Trouvaille), it re-zoned only that par/cular memory care part of the property. Presumably, it did so to maintain control over what happened on the rest of the property—i.e., to make sure a developer would not take advantage of the higher zoning and then boldly announce that it had a “right” to the super-maximum of 44 units. If the Council had gone R-8 all the way at that /me, perhaps Developer would have the “right” that it now says it does. But the Council did not. Therefore, the Commission and Council should con/nue their careful stewardship of the public good now and require a reasonable proposal, not a SuperMax plan.  It’s Inconsistent with the Larger Context: If you step back and look at the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and zoning map more generally, you’ll see apartments, hotels, commercial, retail and other “higher” uses generally arrayed in the center of the city—along highways 5 and 212. Such heavier development falls as you move away from 5/212—with the excep/on of a handful of senior homes (which really are not “heavy” uses in reality). That is the sort of development that makes sense on this property, and is consistent with the broader plan for the city. The city certainly needs a mix of housing types, but it needs them in the right loca/ons. Indeed, the property is named “Lot 2, Block 1, Beehive Home 2nd Addi/on”—where “Beehive” was the original name of the memory care center, and the first Beehive lot was to have a sister building. That was the plan, and it was a good plan. Something’s changed, and now they are going SuperMax. Congratula/ons to them from a business perspec/ve if they can get away with it, but they shouldn’t get away with it. (I don’t see that they are even having to plant any great number of trees or make any other nod to the neighborhood, and are in fact sneaking in a liEle trail to the Dog Park—which is otherwise fenced and inaccessible for security—to further take advantage without giving anything back.) In sum, Staff told me at the public mee/ng that they had not addressed the issue of whether R-4 or R-8 is the right change in zoning, and the Commission need not and should not reach the issue. But if it does, the evidence in the /mely-filed record reflects only the points above, which all show why R-8 SuperMax is wrong for this loca/on. The SuperMax Project Creates Water Problems for Private and Public Neighbors The SuperMax project violates both city prac/ce and the 2040 Comprehensive Plan in terms of run-off. Specifically, I have been told by city staff that property owners are not allowed to change their land such that they push addi/onal water to a neighbor or block drainage of a neighbor. More importantly, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan states, as its top Policy under its top “Natural Resources” Goal (Sec/on 1.7.3): “Preserve natural slopes wherever possible.” Developer’s plan wholly fails on this requirement because it re-directs substan/al water flow onto neighboring land to the North and Northwest, when that run-off currently goes to the Southwest corner of the lot. For current water flow, Developer’s July 11, 2025, leEer to the Watershed District confirms that all current drainage to the North is only toward the Trouvaille Memory Care Facility, and the remainder is to the Southwest corner of the property—i.e., no run-off occurs to the other neighboring 395 6 proper/es. But as to future flow, a large por/on of run-off will be pushed onto single-family proper/es to the North and Northwest. The first image below shows such flow as red arrows in a satellite view, to beEer see the Development in context with the neighbors. The second image shows the same red flow arrows superimposed over Developer’s topographic map to beEer show the steep slopes. It’s a lot of water. The steeply-sloped storm pond is the main cause of this problem. Its walls rise as much as 20 feet higher than the Northern property border (from 975’ to 995’), and you can see the steepness on the downslope surrounding the pond by how densely-packed the topographic lines are. Those steep walls push run-off to the North and Northwest, directly toward the neighboring proper/es. They do this at an extreme grade of 33.3% (in viola/on of the explicit city requirement to “preserve natural slopes wherever possible”), thus giving that run-off maximum velocity directed to the North and Northwest. That water 396 7 moving North on the side of the pond then redirects the West-flowing water in the swale toward the North as soon as the swale ends, and the combined water pushes onto 2461 W 64th Street and 6480 Oriole Avenue (the property to the Northwest, which I own). The changes in slope also violate Chanhassen City Code Sec. 20-110, which requires “preserva/on of the site in its natural state to the extent prac/cable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed or developing areas.” There are no corresponding super-steep slopes in the neighboring areas, and so this aspect of the Development violates both the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and City Code. I have found nothing in Developer’s applica/on that addresses this problem.2 Developer’s maps simply show one Southwest-facing arrow near the spillway area for the pond, and ignore the Northern part of the topography. It is not a de minimus problem either, because the captured area is significant, and the land con/nues to drop 20 or more ver/cal feet (where the long red arrow points). That is my property. It will be eroded, and will be where all of this run-off eventually pools on 6480 Oriole Ave aVer a hard rain. It is inappropriate, and the law prevents the Commission from allowing it. This problem exists if everything goes perfectly. But there are bigger problems if the pond overflows or fails. Developer’s submission appears to calculate a size for the pond, and I’ve not had /me to review that. But rainfall is becoming more unpredictable with climate change, the 6” depression for a spillway on the Southwest side of the pond won’t keep up in a downpour, and the pond will spill even more run- off toward the neighboring proper/es at 2461 W 64th Street and 6480 Oriole Avenue. I suppose at that point, I could complain to the apartment manager and/or the city—but you know that won’t get me anywhere. And I should not be forced to take on the cost of suing, which will quickly equal the flood- diminished value of my property. Rather, the Commission and the City Council should recognize this proposal as a problem now—taking any of the many routes I’ve provided—and force a reasonable development. I’ve not seen much of anything in Developer’s submission about the design of the pond (as opposed to its sizing). My brief study has raised two par/cular problems there. First, a well-designed stormwater pond—especially one that just dumps over its top edge when it overflows—should have a “forebay” where ini/al seEling can occur. See Minnesota Stormwater Manual Wiki: Design criteria for stormwater ponds (available at hEps://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Design criteria for stormwater ponds ). For the Development, my concern is that a substan/al por/on of the run-off is going to come from a parking lot, where cars sit for days and drip oil and other such fluids. Oil floats, so it will float on the top of the pond. And the pond releases via overflow from its top (where the oil would be floa/ng as a sheen), down into the wetland. I see nothing in the applica/on materials that address this problem. 2 At the public mee/ng, Developer suggested that there was some sort of swale on the downhill side of the pond wall. I don’t think that is accurate, because all the topo numbers where my red arrows cross are descending in height, so straight hill and no swale or trough. 397 8 Second, a pond needs to be surrounded by impermeable material like clay that is not only placed on exis/ng ground, but that extends into and is carefully packed into a “core trench” in exis/ng clay or similar material: “Ponds—Planning, Design, and Construc/on,” USDA, Agriculture Handbook 590, p. 1 (available at hEps://nrcspad.sc.egov.usda.gov/distribu/oncenter/pdf.aspx?productID=115 ). This is par/cularly true for any side of a pond that are on a downhill side of the pond, as is the case here. The use of clay or similar impervious material throughout decreases the chances that the pond will leak through its walls (seepage). And the use of a properly-constructed core trench (e.g., made of clay and surrounded by clay) lessens the chance that the wall of the pond will simply slip over the exis/ng soil due to pressure of the water pushing out and down, and lessens the chance that water will leak through the interface between old and new soil. I don’t see anything in the applica/on about this, and I don’t see core samples having been taken in the loca/on where the cri/cal core trench would need to go. As the owner of land that is 20 feet or more lower than the boEom of the pond and downhill from it, just 20 feet from the Development’s NW corner—and who will bear the brunt of any leakage or failure— this is an important issue to me. I don’t see it addressed in the applica/on. More fundamentally, no one should be allowed to build a retaining pond above another person’s property, where it could flood that property. Applicant avoids this concern by never discussing or even showing 6480 Oriole Avenue, even though it’s about 20 feet from the Development’s NW corner, and severely downhill. Apart from my personal run-off and flooding concerns, there should be a great public concern over this project—especially for lovers of Lake Minnewashta. The run-off for this project is not just directly into some random wetland. Rather, it passes into the wetland’s SE corner then out its nearby SW corner into a stream directly into Lake Minnewashta. 398 9 To me, the fundamental problem is that the pond will pick up oil and other petrochemicals because it is mainly catching water from streets and parking lots. Those chemicals float on top of water, and the pond emp/es over its top edge. So an oily film will wash from the paved areas, will float on top of the pond, will slide down the hill onto the surface of the wetland, and will flow through the stream to the surface of Lake Minnewashta. Developer may have experts, but they don’t address any of that, to my understanding. There is addi/onally the problem of the soon-to-come (or maybe not) pond for the Highway 41 traffic circle. Developer’s plan leaves liEle room or flexibility for that pond, which is years away, and whose design may be affected by any number of seen or unforeseen changes in the coming years. In short, allowing construc/on of a parking lot right up to that pond will handcuff what the city can do in the future. And even if the traffic circle designers are confident that their design is set, they were no doubt equally confident just a few months ago that the traffic circle would be under construc/on right now. This is just another in the long line of reasons that Developer’s applica/on should and must be denied. There is one more detailed, but very important, water problem with the submission. Specifically, the Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) by Braun Intertec is five years old—incredibly out-dated. On this one, I’ll rely on Google AI, which explains that there is no set /me for expira/on of an ESA, but gives 6-18 months as a typical /me frame: 399 10 Even if there is some flexibility in that number, five years is way, way longer than 6-18 months. That is especially so for a property like Developer’s property, which has been vacant land next to a busy highway that whole /me. So there is maximum access for any member of the public to see the land and put pollutants on it. And there is effec/vely no ability for the absent owner to observe such ac/on. Perhaps most cri/cally, I see nothing in the applica/on indica/ng that Braun Intertec (and its E&O carrier) is s/ll willing to stand by the report aVer all this /me. So this is an area (vouching for the 5-year-old ESA) where the Developer is missing an expert, but where an expert is needed. The SuperMax Project is a Four-Story Building That Exceeds Even R-8 Limits Even if Developer gets R-8 re-zoning (and it should plainly not, for all the reasons discussed above), such zoning is limited to buildings whose primary façade is three stories or less. Some/mes the determina/on of a primary façade is easy, and some/mes it is complex. Here, it is complex, and Developer has simply assumed the issue away without ever addressing it. If the primary façade is at any other direc/on than East, the applica/on must be denied because every other façade is plainly 3+ stories (and I don’t think even Developer would dispute that). And even if the primary façade is East-only, the applica/on should be denied because the building is more than 3-stories even from the East. Here is the analysis: Developer picked the proper view of the building when making its rendering, and what you see should be considered the primary façade (excluding the roof and ground, of course): Why is this (the NE façade) the appropriate primary façade?  It provides the most complete and contextual view of the building, which presumably is why Developer picked it.  It views the building from the Northeast (facing SW), and that is the angle that people will view it as they enter the property at its NE corner. It is also the angle Southbound drivers will see from Highway 41 as they look from their vehicles. (Hopefully, drivers only look over at a 45-degree angle and not a 90-degree angle—and Northbound drivers will see liEle of the building because it will be blocked by Minneswastha Park trees and berming.)  This façade shows the longest face of the building, which is the North face. The building is longer and of much greater area (because its average height is greater) when viewed from the North as 400 11 compared to when it is viewed from the East. So the North face is the dominant face in terms of size.  This view shows the door—the parking garage door—that is the most visually-dominant entrance to the building and is where the bulk of the entry will be made into the building. Specifically, every unit in the building will have at least one car because there is no mass transit op/on within miles of the building. Residents with a single car will park that car, naturally, in the protected underground parking, and will use the garage door on the North face to enter and leave the building. Residents with two cars will park their primary car in the garage, and the majority of their trips will be with that primary car through the comfort of the garage and garage door. Even secondary cars and all visitors will enter the parking lots from the North side of the building, while seeing primarily the North face of the building. So the vast majority of the coming/goings will be through the North face of the building. Even arrivals that don’t enter the garage will be aimed at the North face of the building as they arrive, and the East face has just a walk-in entry, though one is hard-pressed even to see that entry when looking at the building, so its role is both secondary in usage and secondary in visual importance. Every relevant factor thus points to a Northeast façade being the proper primary façade of the building, and the building is over 3-stories when measured along that façade. If one insists that only the North face or the East face can be the primary façade, then the right answer is the North face for the reasons just discussed, e.g.: (a) the North face is where the bulk of the coming/going will occur; (b) it is the longest and much-largest face of the building; (c) it has the largest and most visually-dominant entry; and (d) it beEer reflects the other faces of the building because it shows the garage surface and materials that are visible from the surrounding parks, and thus should also be considered relevant façades of the building (even though they are not primary façades). The fact that Highway 41 is toward the East of the building changes nothing, and certainly cannot control the analysis. Specifically, the loca/on of nearby roads is only one factor and is essen/ally a non-factor in the present context. Even if the Commission gives full weight to Highway 41, it is only a single factor and is overcome by all the factors just discussed. The building here is set back far from the highway, and will further be blocked by the collec/on pond for the traffic circle. Moreover, Easter views of the building will be flee/ng at best because there is no sidewalk or other path by which slower movers (like pedestrians and cyclists) will pass that side of the building. In short, this is not a typical house that fronts on a street and sidewalk, but is instead an L-shaped building who greatest size and dominant visual features face North, not East. The proper façade is North, and the building is too tall even for R-8. Even viewed solely from the East, the building exceeds three stories, as shown in red circle-ish area below: 401 12 Even if one were to give Developer R-8 (which would be wrong); even if one allowed Developer to ignore the proper primary and dominant façade (which would be wrong); and even if one were to allow Developer to go SuperMax on all of this (which also would be wrong)—the Commission s/ll does not have power under R-8 zoning to go over three stories, and thus, Developer’s applica/on must be rejected as a maEer of law. Three stories is a hard limit; there is no “close enough.” But regardless of what face is selected as the primary façade, the above exercise shows why this SuperMax approach is the wrong approach. At its extreme edge, it could sneak in as almost a 3-story building, but it is primarily a 4-story building and should be viewed as such whether one considers R-4 or R-8 to be the relevant zoning. And more generally, it’s the wrong building for this site. The SuperMax Project Creates Traffic Dangers You will no doubt hear from others about how dangerous traffic is in this par/cular loca/on of Highway 41. I will try to s/ck with points I don’t an/cipate others to make. For a start, Developer’s single-page from its supposed traffic expert does not move the ball at all—for many reasons. First, it pulls a number from the ITE Trip Genera/on Manual, and although I can’t pay $499 to get a copy of that manual, it appears this was nothing more than a number that pops out of “3- story building with 44 units” lookup—with no more context than that. So the Manual would pop out the same number for people entering/leaving a site by car as (a) a building in ManhaEen with no on-site parking and a subway sta/on next door, (b) a building in a suburb that has only 44 parking spaces instead of 88, or (c) an apartment building in the most rural town you can imagine. Now, I’m not an expert, but super-experts have cri/cized the ITE Manual for lacking such context. For example, well-known UCLA urban planning professor Donald Shoup in Access Magazine centers on ITE data hiding lack of accuracy by presen/ng data with high levels of supposed precision even though it lacks context: ITE’s stamp of authority relieves planners from the obliga/on to think for themselves— the answers are right there in the book. ITE offers a precise number without raising difficult public policy ques/ons, although it does warn, “Users of this report should exercise extreme cau/on when u/lizing data that is based on a small number of studies.” …. To unsophis/cated users, the precise rates look like constants, similar to the boiing 402 13 point of water or the speed of light. Many planners treat parking and trip genera/on like physical laws and the reported rates like scien/fic observa/ons. But parking and trip genera/on are poorly understood phenomena. Shoup, Roughly Right or Precisely Wrong, Access Magazine at 20-25 (Spring 2002). In other words, this is not a simple plug-and-chug issue, as Developer’s submission would imply. Others have noted that much of the ITE data is 20 or more years old, and thus unreliable (especially with lifestyle changes caused by Covid). Moreover, apart from pulling a number and sta/ng the result “is an/cipated to be minimal,” the “expert” does absolutely no analysis. He certainly is able to do an analysis, because he appears to have done so for the Santa Vera Apartments project that you will also review Tuesday night. And in any event, an expert cannot simply say “I’m an expert” and state a conclusion—he must explain himself. Here, he does not men/on the school, does not men/on studying its traffic or anything related to it, does not men/on when the peak traffic /mes from the Development are and how they relate to school peak /mes (or how he determined what each of those peak /mes were), he does not men/on the unique situa/on of an apartment entering onto a 55 mph highway across from a school doing the same, or any other relevant factor. We’re just supposed to take his word. My ul/mate point is that every site is unique, and Developer’s submission ignores the important context of this site. I’ve not seen anyone studying the area recently, and I have a personal exper/se for the area because it is along my regular walking path. Its uniquely dangerous features include:  Cars leaving the Development dump right onto a highway, not a city street. The speed limit is 55 mph for Southbound traffic and effec/vely 55 mph for Northbound traffic, because only a small percent of Northbound vehicles slow to the 45 mph limit. (I oVen check the electronic road-side speed sign on my walks, and typically 6 to 12 cars exceed the limit before even one meets it— i.e., speed compliance is about 10% for Northbound traffic.)  It is a uniquely dangerous area, as the city, parents, and school have recognized—owing to a combina/on of mul/ple problems. The primary problem is traffic coming South from Westbound 7. There are two lanes of traffic turning leV off 7, they get impa/ent at the red arrow, and they come off that turn like NASCAR racers. They are then faced with the problem of merging as they accelerate, and simultaneously dealing with cars going into and out of the Speedy/Caribou/NorthCoop area. So there is speeding, accelera/ng, merging, jostling, and informa/on overload. Way too frequently, they don’t merge at all, and they cruise illegally down the cross-hatched part of the road—and that is today a huge risk to kids in the pedestrian crosswalk. If you approve this plan, a mul/plied risk when entering traffic from the Development will amp the chaos up even further. A secondary problem is that Northbound traffic comes in steaming hot, well over the 45 mph limit.  And I haven’t even added the problem of school traffic yet. As others will tell you, traffic backs up in the Southbound leV turn lane (right in front of the Development) and complicates things for everyone during both pick-up and drop-off and other /mes, and pedestrian traffic is high (and will create issues even aVer the traffic circle is complete).  The traffic has increased greatly since Covid, and its aggression has increased also. For example, a larger number of people prefer to keep driving in the illegal cross-hatched area rather than 403 14 merge before the crosswalk. Adding more complica/on to that area will not help anything, and the complica/on cannot just be waived away whether one is an “expert” or not.  Highway 41 is also a thoroughfare for heavy, mul/-axle dump trucks that pick of gravel and similar products in the pits near the South end of Highway 41, because it is the straightest path for distribu/on and development along highway 7. The same is true of other traffic from Highway 212 going onto Highway 7. Sit at the pedestrian crosswalk for an hour some/me. It’s craaaazy. It is also definitely not enough to say that the problems will be fixed by a round-about. That project is years away, so its uncertainty is a magnitude more than when Staff believed this Spring that it would be a “go,” and wasn’t. Cri/cally, experts and economists expect tariffs to increase infla/on for road construc/on considerably, such that a project years out cannot be viewed with any confidence. For example, the Senior Managing Editor of Roads & Bridges Magazine recently explained how Kansas’ secretary of transporta/on noted, “If tariffs go up, if prices con/nue to go up, if revenues go down, if more money is transferred away, then there are projects that will likely have to be sacrificed.” Gavin Jenkins, “Trump’s Tariffs and the Cost of Construc/on,” Roads & Bridges (Apr. 3, 2025) (available at hEps://www.roadsbridges.com/road-construc/on/news/55279591/trumps-tariffs-and-the-cost-of- construc/on). Similar reports are legion. E.g., Sebas/an Orbando, “Sweeping New Tariffs Put Future Construc/on Jobs at Risk,” Construc/on Dive (Apr. 3, 2025) (available at hEps://www.construc/ondive.com/news/trump-tariffs-construc/on-risk-libera/on-day/744334/ ). So it’s not enough to fill the overage from the recent bidding, but one would need to add substan/ally more to the budget to have any confidence at all. Moreover, the traffic circle will be only a par/al fix that helps cars, but not the young pedestrians we should care most about. If you’ve used a traffic circle like the one by Costco on Highway 41, you’ll know it really smooths vehicle traffic. But you’ll also know that your aEen/on as a driver is filled up with whether cars from the leV will hit you, and whether cars from the right will yield to you. The problem is that you don’t see the pedestrians—who have the right-of-way—at the loca/on where you exit the circle. That’s fine for a circle like the Costco one, where there are few pedestrians. But it’s a problem where there are more pedestrians. A traffic engineer might point out that traffic circles have fewer fatali/es, but if you dig deeper, you learn that is because traffic circles push pedestrians to yield to cars (even though the pedestrians have the right-of-away). But this doesn’t work as well with young pedestrians—especially those on e-bikes—who are less likely to stop when they know the cars are supposed to stop. In any event, a glib answer of “it will be alright when the traffic circle is in,” is no answer at all—but that’s what Developer provides. In sum, Developer is much too flippant about a traffic problem it doesn’t live around and that it has failed to even study—hiding behind a naked asser/on that its addi/on to the problem is too small to maEer. The SuperMax Project Creates Visual Problems for Neighbors The Developer’s submissions lack informa/on about surrounding proper/es that would provide context showing that the SuperMax proposal is wrong for the site visually—both in crea/ng light pollu/on that is 404 15 wholly at odds with the surrounding SFR zoning, and for being much too large and imposing because of how big it is and how it is sited. First, the project will create unreasonable light pollu/on for the houses to the North—light pollu/on that the owners of those houses never expected and that they should not have to endure. For example, the image below shows how these neighbors have a direct line-of-sight (indicated by yellow arrows) out all their back or side windows toward the five parking lot lights (indicated by red dots). These are the back rooms of a house (typically, living room and bedrooms) where one least expects to look out and have bright dots of light burning away: The following image roughly shows how the neighbors will be looking up at the lights, and how fencing will not fix the problem of the parking lot lights: This image also provides a disturbing idea of how badly the SuperMax project will violate their privacy. This is par/cularly troublesome because these houses are on a cul-de-sac and were thus built to be back- yard-oriented. Specifically, cul de sac houses naturally have a wedge shape, and thus a smaller front yard and larger back yard—so focus occurs for the back yard (which will now face a huge apartment building). Imagine si‘ng down any /me aVer 5 p.m. in the Winter to read or watch TV, and mul/ple bright, yellow 405 16 dots are burning back at you through your back windows (perhaps accompanied in the Summer with some boom-boom from the outdoor party deck).3 Staring out at parking lot lights may be okay if you’re staying at a Residence Inn for one night, and it may be funny in Na/onal Lampoon’s Christmas vaca/on… But it’s not okay for people who moved to an edge area of Chanhassen and who reasonably expected something else. The residents of the cul de sac—vo/ng and tax-paying residents of Chanhassen—did not buy into that, were not in any way warned about it, and should not have it thrust on them by the Commission or the City Council. R-8 zoning is not the Developer’s right, and a brightly-lit parking lot is not the Developer’s right. “But….but…the trees will cover for this problem.” Wrong. First, to the extent there are trees between the lights and the houses next door, they are not trees on Developer’s property. As far as I can see, the Northwest side of the Development is naked—because of the holding pond that the SuperMax approach has required. The neighboring residents should not be required to maintain tree cover to address Developer’s light pollu/on. Second, most of the trees in this area are dead or dying ash trees, and the rest are threatened. The building will be there 80 years, but the trees likely will not be. As just one example of tree death, Developer’s plans show major tree canopy coverage along the West border of its property, but I took this picture (from just West of the property’s NW corner—from the NE corner of Herman Field Park) last week, showing that all the actual trees are 100% dead, and all that is leV is low- lying sumac and buckthorn weeds. 3 To the extent Developer tries to focus on the cone of light thrown down by the lights, the point is not that these houses are outside that par/cular cone. Rather, the point is that these residents—who purchased in a single-family residen/al area with single-family residen/al behind them, will now have to see these high, bright lights any /me they look out the backs of their houses. 406 17 Further on the depressing dying tree phenomenon, the Commission members might also be aware that the Minnewashta Dog Park immediately adjacent to the Development had a full crew spends 6 weeks this Spring cu‘ng down and chopping up dead ash and other trees. The trees are thinning to-the- extreme. Third, and perhaps most important, the light pollu/on will occur mostly in the Winter, when darkness predominates, and when the trees have no leaves to block the light pollu/on. Aside from light pollu/on, the SuperMax project will also visually pollute the users of nearby parks— both because of how tall (about 45 feet) and otherwise massive the building is, but also because (a) it is sited high on a hill (about 43 feet tall) that towers over Herman Field Park, and (b) it almost touches the Dog Park trail (about 40 feet away) and towers over it. As for Herman field park, the first image below shows a view from behind a 6-foot adult (you have to strain to see him because the Development is so massive) looking at the West face of the Development from the East edge of Herman Field Park. The second image shows a map view so you can beEer understand where this person is standing and where they are looking: 407 18 This is horrible. Really. How could anyone think it is not? Par/cularly on a lot that has never been zoned higher than single-family residen/al. It calls to mind the enormous mansions of Newport, Rhode Island, except those look nice. It also calls to mind Joseph Welch’s famous ques/on of Senator McCarthy: “Have you no sense of decency?” Developer is not en/tled to R-8, its SuperMax approach abuses the idea of R- 8 zoning, and the Development is simply too massive and urban/commercial of a building for this rural- like se‘ng. The building is just as problema/c when viewed from the Lake Minnewashta Dog Park that sits to the South. For those unfamiliar, that dog park is not just an open area of grass, but a beau/ful meandering nature trail through the woods. And although Developer’s applica/on does not show it, Carver County public records show the dog trail located right by the property line: With the apartment building set back from the South property line by only 40 feet, the following image shows the effect of the building on anyone using the dog park. 408 19 Notably, the apartment’s open party deck towers over the dog park, and will provide visual annoyance to users of the park, and also likely loud music that could disturb both the dogs and their owners. To summarize, the building, again, is massive, and wholly out of context with the area. This is not a downtown Chanhassen dog park; it is, by its feel, a rural dog park, and that is why it is so in demand. I am also not aware if the Minnewashta Regional Park Board has had a chance to understand what Chanhassen is doing 40 feet away. Even if Minnewashta Park has no direct legal say in this construc/on, it certainly seems prudent for the city, as a good municipal neighbor, to give that Park Board a full opportunity to hear from its stakeholders and provide input to the city. The Architectural Style is Inconsistent with the Area, and is Instead Cut-and- Paste from Urban and Commercial Architecture The design of the SuperMax building does not fit with the neighborhood, as the City requires. The neighborhood is a mix of classic styles, with angled/shingled roofs, lap and stucco siding, dormers, and the like. One need merely look next door to the memory care facility to see a building that is large, but that reflects the neighborhood style and is a good neighbor. 409 20 In contrast, Developer’s proposed building is a cut-and-paste of hundreds of other apartment buildings in urban/commercial areas—a style called “MinecraVism” and “Simcityism.” The “style” is a flat-roofed box, with a mélange of randomly earth-tone-colored rectangles. Below are just a few examples from the same architects in commercial/urban areas—though the Commission members have surely seen this same apartment design in many other commercial/urban areas. My point is that, even if you like this style, it is an urban/commercial style, and has not been designed to fit into our area one whit. The Morrison Apartments (by Kaas Wilson) in a commercial district in Rosemount: Axle Apartments (by Kaas Wilson), at a major intersec1on in Fridley: 410 21 The Exchange Apartments (by Kaas Wilson), in a commercial area in New Brighton: Sonder Point (by Kaas Wilson), in a Brooklyn Center office park and commercial district: Chanhassen does not have a high architectural hurdle, but it does require some minimal sensi/vity to the site and surroundings. 411 22 Whatever the design’s merits or demerits, it is urban/commercial and is not adapted to its mostly- residen/al environment. The exis/ng memory care shows proper design; in contrast, the proposed SuperMax building shows inten/onally-blind design. Developer has made no explana/on about how this design fits in any way with the largely-residen/al neighborhood. Conclusion The one-story memory care center next door is a logical use of the land and is what we were told would be the use of the vacant remainder (Beehive phase 2). Developer is trying to change that and maximize its profits by maximizing every parameter of the Development. This is a building in size and design that should be in an urban or commercial area (e.g., in or near the Central Business District and transit)— both as a general maEer and as to how Chanhassen is otherwise arranged. Developer’s effort to push a giant structure in a residen/al area should be rejected and must be rejected. Let them come back with something reasonable, like they had been planning in 2017 and 2020. Best Regards, John Dragseth John Dragseth 412