Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
09-22-2025City Council Agenda and Packet
A.5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Note: This meeting will be held in the new City Hall and is open to the public. If the City Council does not complete the work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda. Public comment is not allowed at the work session. A.1 Heritage Tree Ordinance Discussion A.2 Market Blvd Improvement Project Update A.3 Accessory Structure Ordinance Discussion A.4 Permitted Burns Ordinance Discussion A.5 Budget Follow-Up Discussion A.6 City Council Roundtable A.7 Future Work Session Schedule B.7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance) C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS C.1 Congratulations on Civic Campus Phase I completion, and welcome to the new Council Chambers C.2 District 112 Referendum - Dr. Erin Rathke, Superintendent of District 112 Schools D.CONSENT AGENDA All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to the council packet for each staff report. AGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2025 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD 1 D.1 Approve City Council Special Work Session Minutes dated September 4, 2025 D.2 Approve City Council Meeting Minutes dated September 8, 2025 D.3 Approve City Council Work Session Minutes dated September 8, 2025 D.4 Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated September 2, 2025 D.5 Receive Environmental Commission Minutes dated July 9, 2025 D.6 Approve Claims Paid dated September 22, 2025 D.7 Minnesota Valley Operation Round Up Grant Award D.8 Firefighting Personal Protective Equipment Donation D.9 Approve Civic Campus Splashpad Purchase with Commercial Recreation Specialist, Inc D.10 Approve entering into agreements with Construction Manager for Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center D.11 Resolution XX-25 Accepting Donation from Level 7 Development, LLC D.12 Resolution 2025-XX; Authorize condemnation of land associated with the southerly extension of Laredo Drive D.13 Resolution 2025-XX: Accept $528.01 Donation from Chaska Community Hockey Association for Community Day Sponsorship D.14 Resolution 2025-XX: Authorize Design and Construction Administration Services Contract for the 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance and the Red Cedar Point Drainage Improvement Projects E.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda). E.1 Kerry Zajicek Citizen Action Request F.FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE G.PUBLIC HEARINGS H.GENERAL BUSINESS H.1 Approve Site Plan for a Memory Care Facility at 1620 Arboretum Blvd (#25-10) H.2 Approve Final Plat of Avienda Apartments (Planning Case 25-08) H.3 Resolution 25-XX: Support for Suburban Transit Providers I.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 2 J.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS K.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION K.1 Correspondence Letter L.ADJOURNMENT GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations. Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required to complete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available at https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior to the meeting. A total of thirty minutes is alloted for Visitor Presentations. Priority is given to Chanhassen residents. An additional thirty minutes may be provided after General Business items are complete at the discretion of the City Council. Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City Council. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson that can summarize the issue. Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. Comments may also be emailed to the City Council at council@chanhassenmn.gov. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be directed to the City Manager. Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Tequila Butcher, 590 West 79th Street in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the public are welcome. 3 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Heritage Tree Ordinance Discussion File No.Item No: A.1 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Jamie Marsh, Environmental Resource Specialist Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION No formal action; discussion only. Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY At a previous City Council roundtable, the mayor and council members expressed interest in renewing the conversation regarding a heritage tree ordinance. Staff has prepared a potential ordinance establishing what constitutes a "Heritage Tree" and potential regulations associated with such trees. City Council will be asked to provide feedback on the following: - A Heritage Tree is typically defined as a tree that measures at least 25" DBH (diameter at breast height) for deciduous trees and 30' height for coniferous trees. - The draft ordinance includes potential regulations around Heritage Trees that could be applicable for subdivisions, individual properties, or both. Staff will provide the following during the work session discussion: - Research from comparable cities and their ordinances relative to heritage trees. - Options for city code amendments to implement potential added regulations for heritage trees. 4 Staff has included a draft redline ordinance for consideration. Staff anticipates updates to the draft ordinance based on feedback from the City Council discussion. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION No formal recommendation; general discussion only. ATTACHMENTS Heritage Shade Tree Redlined Ordinance 5 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. XXX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 AND CHAPTER 20 CHANHASSEN SUBDIVISION CODE AND CITY CODE, DEFINING HERITAGE TREES AND ADDING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS RELATED TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS AND PRESERVATION OF OR REPLACEMENT OF HERITAGE TREES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 7-19(m) of the City Code, City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, is hereby amended to include the following: The building official may require that plans and specifications, required by the Minnesota State Building Code, include a survey of the lot upon which the proposed building or construction is to be done, prepared and attested by a registered surveyor. An original signature is required on the certificate of survey. The survey shall provide the following information unless otherwise approved by the administrative authority: (m) Tree removal, tree preservation, heritage tree preservation and removal and grading plan if required by the development contract or building permit. Section 2. Section 18-61(d)(2) of the City Code, City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, is hereby amended to include the following: (2) Prior to the submittal of development plans, a tree survey of the site shall be prepared by a registered landscape architect, licensed foresters, or other professional approved by the city. The tree survey shall reflect conditions on site at the time of submittal, or shall have been reviewed and updated no more than two years prior to the submittal date. This survey shall include the species, DBH size, condition identified as poor, fair, or good, location of all trees over ten inches in diameter, and any damaged or diseased trees on site. All significant, special, damaged, or diseased trees shall be tagged and identified on the survey. A delineation of the existing canopy coverage area(s), which outline all areas covered by tree canopy, shall be included as part of the survey. Additionally, all damaged and diseased trees shall be cataloged with the nature and extent of any damage or disease specified 6 Section 3. Section 18-61(d)(2)(f) and Section 18-61(d)(2)(h) of the City Code, City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, is hereby added as follows: f. In addition to minimum canopy coverage, if a subdivision proposes to remove Heritage Trees, the applicant will be subject to replacement requirements. Heritage Trees are defined as living deciduous trees that measure at least 25” DHB or living coniferous trees that measure 30’ in height or more. The applicant will be required to replace the equivalent inches at a rate of 1:1” for deciduous and 1:1’ for coniferous trees. These replacement plantings are in addition to and do not count towards plantings associated with adhering to canopy coverage requirements. h. General Exemptions: 1. The following species are not considered Heritage Trees but still need to be listed on a tree survey if over 10” in diameter: ash, aspen, boxelder, cottonwood, elm, mulberry willow, and fruit trees. 2. Any invasive or noxious species, as defined by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture, will not be considered a Heritage Tree. 3. A removal allowance of 25% of heritage tree diameter inches will be given. Any heritage trees in excess of 25% will be subject to the replacement requirements. Section 4. Section 18-61(d)(2)(c) of the City Code, City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, is hereby amended to include the following: c. Priority shall be given to retaining stands of trees and undisturbed wooded lands, as well as heritage trees that measure at least 25” DBH. No more than ten percent of the canopy retention requirement may be met by an individual tree that is not included within a designated woodland area. Section 5. Section 20-1178 of the City Code, City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, is hereby amended to include the following: (d) Heritage Trees shall be defined as living deciduous trees that measure at least 25” in diameter at breast height (DBH) or living coniferous trees that measure 30’ in height or more. (1) Heritage Trees shall not be removed from private property unless approved by the city. a. If Heritage Trees are removed from private property, the property owner will be required to plant the equivalent number of DBH inches removed at a rate of 1 new inches of tree for every 1 inch removed. 7 For example, if two trees each measuring 25” DHB are removed, then a total of 25” DHB of new trees shall be required to be replanted. i. Replacement requirements shall only apply to building permits for new homes and will not apply to existing home additions. ii. If, based on the sole discretion of the designated city forester, there is not adequate space to plant the required number of trees to meet the DBH replacement requirement, then a property owner may pay the tree replacement fee as established by the city’s annual fee schedule. One inch of DBH shall equate to 1 annual fee amount. For example, if it is found that the site cannot support ten DBH replacement inches, then the property owner would be required to pay the tree replacement fee ten times. iii. Heritage trees that are dead/dying and or diseased and pose a threat to public safety or pose a threat to the health of trees in the city and beyond are not subject to replacement requirements. Section 5. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this ___day of _____, 2025, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota ______________________________ ________________________________ Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor (Published in the ____________ on ______________________________) 8 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Market Blvd Improvement Project Update File No.ENG 25-02 Item No: A.2 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY Staff will review an updated layout for a scaled down version of the project as directed by City Council at their August 11, 2025 Work Session. BACKGROUND N/A DISCUSSION Preparing a feasibility study and taking the initial step of ordering the project is needed to keep on schedule for construction in 2026. BUDGET Staff will provide an update on project budget as part of the presentation. 9 RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS MARKET BLVD REHAB OPTION_PROJECT LAYOUT 10 NO PARKINGNO P A R K I N G X X X X XXXXXXXXXXXXNO PARKINGNO PA R K I N G X X X X XXXXXXXXXXXXDOBLOCKDOBLOCKNOTNOTDOBLOCKNOT12' THRU 12' L-THRU 12.5' THRU 4' BLVD 6' WALK 8' MEDIAN 11' L E F T 11' T H R U 12.5' R I G H T 4' B L V D 12' S H A R E D U S E P A T H 11' T H R U 12.5' T H R U 12' LE F T 11' T H R U 12.5' R - T H R U 6' BL V D12' S H A R E D U S E P A T H 12' T H R U 12.5' R - T H R U 12' SHARED U S E P A T H 4' BLVD 12.5' R-TUR N 11' THRU 6' BL V D 12' S H A R E D U S E P A T H 12' S H A R E D U S E P A T H 4' BL V D 12.5 T H R U 12' T H R U 10' M E D I A N 12' T H R U 12' R- T H R U 12' SHARED USE PATH 6' BLVD 13.5' R-THRU 13.5' THRU 13.5' LEFT 12' THRU 12' THRU 2026 CONSTRUCTION YEAR - REHABILITATION MARKET BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS 11 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Accessory Structure Ordinance Discussion File No.Item No: A.3 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Eric Maass, Community Development Director Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION No formal action; discussion only. Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY This discussion continues the one held on September 8. Since then, staff have researched similar cities for their regulations regarding the square footage of accessory building space allowed on residential properties. That comparison table has been attached for reference. Staff will have graphic examples to support the work session discussion. BACKGROUND The city has received a request for an additional agricultural building on land actively used for farming. While the cold storage agricultural building would be exempt from a building permit, it does require a zoning permit and, therefore, compliance with the city's zoning code. Currently, the city code limits the accessory structure space on all residential properties to a total of 1,000 square feet. Staff has prepared a draft ordinance that would allow properties that are zoned Agricultural (A2) and that desire an Agricultural building to be exempt from the total square footage limitation. These buildings would still be required to adhere to applicable standards, including 12 minimum setbacks and impervious lot cover. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS City Zoning Map Accessory Structure Ordinance Reorganization and Ag Structure Exemption Community Comparison - Accessory Structure Ordinance Research 13 Zoning Map September 15, 2025 ± 1 in = 4,333 Ft Legend City Boundary Zoning A2 BF BH BN CBD IOP NE OI PUD PUDR R4 R-8 R12 R-16 RD RLM RR RSF 14 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. XXX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 20-904 of the City Code, City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, is hereby amended as follows: Sec 20-904 Accessory Structures a) A detached accessory structure shall be located in the buildable lot area or required rear yard. No accessory use or structure in any residential district shall be located in any required front, side or rear setback with the following exceptions: 1. In the A2, RR, RSF, RLM and R4 districts the total square footage of all accessory structures shall not exceed 1,000 square feet. In the RSF, RLM and R4 districts these structures may encroach into the rear setback as follows: a. Less than 140 square feet, minimum rear setback is five feet. b. One hundred forty-one to 399 square feet, minimum rear setback is ten feet. c. Four hundred square feet and above, minimum rear setback is 30 feet, except in the RLM district where the minimum rear setback is 25 feet. 2.1.On riparian lots, detached garages and storage buildings may be located in the front or rear yard but must comply with front, side and applicable ordinary high water mark setbacks and may not occupy more than 30 percent of the yard in which it is built. 3.2.Tennis courts and swimming pools may be located in rear yards with a minimum side and rear yard setback of ten feet, but must comply with applicable ordinary high water mark setbacks. b) In the RR, RSF, RLM and R4 districts the total square footage of all accessory structures shall not exceed 1,000 square feet. Agricultural buildings, as defined by Minnesota State Statute, shall be exempt from the 1,000 square feet maximum but shall adhere to all other applicable standards, including but not limited to impervious lot cover and minimum building setbacks. 15 c) In the RR, RSF, RLM and R4 districts the total square footage of all accessory structures shall not exceed 1,000 square feet. 1. On riparian lots, detached garages and storage buildings may be located in the front or rear yard but must comply with front, side and applicable ordinary high water mark setbacks and may not occupy more than 30 percent of the yard in which it is built. d) A detached accessory structure may occupy not more than 30 percent of the area of any rear yard. b)e) For parcels with less than three acres in any residential or agricultural district, no accessory structure or use shall be erected, constructed or commenced prior to the erection, construction or commencement of the principal permitted structure or use, but may be erected or commenced simultaneously. If the principal structure or use is subsequently removed, destroyed or discontinued, the accessory structure or use must be removed or discontinued within 12 months. c)f) Shall comply with the Freedom to Breathe Provision of the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act contained in M.S. §§ 1144.411 to 1144.417. d)g) Docks, which shall comply with section 20-920. e)h) Pursuant to authority granted by M.S. § 462.3593 subdiv. 9, the City of Chanhassen opts-out of the requirements of M.S. § 462.3593. Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this ___day of _______, 2025, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota _____________________________ ________________________________ Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor (Published in the ______________________________ on ______________________________) 16 City Accessory Structure SF Permitted Chanhassen • 1,000 square feet for all accessory structures Eden Prairie • Total ratio of the total square footage of all garages (attached and detached), and all accessory structures, may not exceed 0.075 Minnetonka • R-1: Aggregate of 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, anything exceeding this size is a conditional use permit • R-2: aggregate of 600 square feet of gross floor area. • R-3: Garages excluded; all other accessory structures limited to 120 square feet. Shakopee • No accessory building shall exceed 10% of the lot area or exceed 75% of the square footage of the footprint of the principal dwelling, whichever is less. • The maximum total footprint of accessory structures for lots less than 20 acres in area in the Rural Residential Zone, Sewered Rural Residential Zone and Agricultural Preservation Zone is 2,400 square-feet Wayzata • The total floor area of either an attached garage or a detached garage for a single family detached dwelling shall not exceed 750 square feet of floor area and not exceed the ground coverage of the dwelling. • No accessory building, structure, and/or detached garage or combination thereof for a single-family dwelling shall occupy more than 25 percent of the area of the rear yard. • The total of all accessory buildings shall not exceed 50 percent of the gross floor area of the principal buildings. • Except in the R-1A and R-1 Zoning Districts, no building permit shall be issued for more than one detached or attached private garage for each single-family dwelling. • With the exception of the R-1A and R-1 Zoning Districts, no building permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one accessory building and/or structure. Waconia • Lots 10,500 square feet and smaller = 1,000 square feet combined of accessory structures allowed. • Lots 10,501 to 21,780 square feet (half acre) = 1,200 square feet. • Lots 21,781 square feet to 43,560 square feet (Half acre to one acre) = 1,400 square feet. 17 • Lots 43,561 square feet and larger = 1,600 square feet. • Total maximum hardcover surface of the lot shall not exceed 35 percent. Victoria • Agricultural property allows structures accessory to ag use. • R-1: One private detached garage per separately owned parcel, not to exceed 900 square feet. Accessory storage shed for domestic supplies, not to exceed 900 square feet. Greenhouses not to exceed 900 square feet and not involving retail or wholesale sales. • R-2: One private detached garage per separately owned parcel not to exceed 600 square feet. Accessory storage shed for domestic supplies not to exceed 600 square feet. Greenhouses not to exceed 600 square feet and not involving retail or wholesale sales. Carver • Agricultural: Horticultural uses including structures designed for the storage of products and machinery pertaining and necessary to horticultural operations. Accessory uses customarily incidental to an agricultural permitted use. No size maximum stipulated. • 2.5 Acre + Lots: 800 square feet. Maximum of 2 accessory structures. • R-1: 800 square feet. Maximum of 2 accessory structures. • R-2 800 square feet. Maximum of 2 accessory structures. • R-3: No maximum square footage, but limited to 2 structures. Chaska • Rural Residential: One accessory storage structure in addition to a detached garage on properties whose principal use is single family residential, subject to the following: Maximum size shall be 150 square feet per contiguous acre owned. • Single-family Residential Districts: o No more than two accessory buildings. o One accessory building shall not exceed 768 square feet in floor area on lots of 7,200 square feet in size or greater, or 624 square feet on lots of less than 7,200 square feet in size and shall not exceed 15 feet in height. o A second accessory building shall not exceed 256 square feet in floor area, nor shall exceed 12 feet in height. o No attached garage shall exceed 1000 square feet or 75% of the square footage of the footprint of the principal dwelling, whichever is less. 18 o Attached garages, for the purpose of this section, shall not be counted toward the allowable accessory structures. Excelsior • R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, CC, and MU: o Number. No lot shall contain an attached garage together with a detached garage and a storage shed. A lot may contain two of the three but not all three. o The aggregate footprint or coverage of all garages and accessory buildings shall not exceed 800 square feet. o No detached garage shall exceed 768 square feet in floor area on lots of 12,000 or greater, or 624 square feet on lots of less than 12,000 square feet in size. o No attached garage shall exceed 800 square feet or 75 percent of the square footage of the footprint of the principal dwelling, whichever is less. o Maximum floor area for storage sheds shall be 120 square feet. Plymouth • Except in the case of single- and two-family dwellings, the total amount of detached accessory building space shall not exceed 30 percent of the gross floor area of the principal building(s), except by conditional use permit. • In the FRD and RSF Zoning Districts and for single-family detached dwellings in the RMF Zoning Districts, no detached accessory building shall equal more than 30 percent of the area of the rear yard or contain over 700 square feet in gross floor area, whichever is less. The exception is that in the FRD district, a detached accessory building may exceed 700 square feet in gross floor area upon issuance of a conditional use permit. • In the case of single- and two-family dwellings, the gross floor area of an accessory building shall not exceed the gross floor area of the principal building. • A maximum of two detached accessory buildings shall be allowed per single- or two-family lot, of which not more than one may contain over 200 square feet in gross floor area. Savage • Total square footage of all accessory structure(s) combined can’t exceed 1,000 sq. ft. Attached garage area is included in the total square footage of accessory structure area. • Total accessory structure area cannot exceed the ground floor (or main floor) area of the residence. • Lots less than ½ acre (21,780 sq. ft. or smaller) in size are allowed one accessory structure in addition 19 • to one attached or detached garage but only one detached accessory structure may exceed 120 sq. ft. • Lots ½ acre and larger (more than 21,780 sq. ft.) in size are allowed two accessory structures in addition to an attached or detached garage. Only one detached structure may exceed 120 sq. ft. Shorewood • For single-family and two-family homes, no accessory building, including attached garages, or combination of accessory buildings but excluding docks shall exceed three in number, nor 1,200 square feet in area in the R 1A, R 1B, R 1C, R 2A, R 2B and R 3A Districts, nor 1,000 square feet in area in the R 1D, R 2C, R 3B and R-C Districts, except by conditional use permit as provided for in § 1201.04 of this chapter. • The total area of accessory buildings shall not exceed the floor area of all stories above grade of the principal structure. The City Council may grant an exception for greenhouse with conditions stipulated in code. Prior Lake • The total ground floor area of all detached accessory structures located on a single residential property in the R-1 and R-2 zoning districts shall not exceed 1,000 square feet or 30 percent of the rear yard. • The total ground floor area of all detached accessory structures in the R-3 zoning district shall not exceed 750 square feet or 30 percent of the rear yard. 20 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Permitted Burns Ordinance Discussion File No.Item No: A.4 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Andrew Heger, Fire Chief Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION Staff would like to engage the council in discussion concerning the permitted burning process, which is currently allowed in portions of the community by ordinance. Based upon council feedback, possible ordinance changes would be brought back to a future meeting. Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Operational Excellence SUMMARY BACKGROUND The current City Code stipulates that fires exceeding the dimensions of a standard recreational fire— defined as three feet by three feet—are permitted only if a valid permit has been issued by the fire department. The code further specifies that such permits will be granted exclusively to properties located in rural areas of the city. In practice, this has generally been interpreted to include only those properties situated south of Lyman Boulevard; however, there is no official map or figure delineating the exact properties eligible for a permit. In addition to being located on an eligible property, applicants must satisfy several additional criteria 21 before a permit may be issued. These requirements include the following: The applicant must not have violated the conditions of any previous burn permit. The proposed burn site must be situated on a property identified as eligible to receive a burn permit in Section 9-32. The proposed burn site must be at least 250 feet from any building. There must be no practical alternative method for disposing of the materials, such as off-site hauling, chipping, or composting. Permit issuance has remained relatively low, with four permits granted in 2023, twenty-one in 2024, and fifteen issued year-to-date in 2025. Staff have suspended the issuance of new permits since the end of July, pending further discussion with the City Council. In addition to the permits issued, the fire department has responded to a total of nine incidents this year that were classified as illegal burns. Several of these fires—both permitted and unpermitted—have required significant fire department resources, often due to the fire being left unattended, not fully extinguished, or becoming uncontrollable. One recent incident necessitated a staff callback to assemble the necessary resources and required approximately two hours to contain. This resulted in the city incurring additional costs for staffing needs. The location of this fire posed additional challenges, as it was difficult to access and required specialized equipment. These incidents pose an immense amount of stress on our current staffing model and can pull critical resources away from other needs within the community. The fire department often receives community feedback, particularly regarding concerns about smoke and its impact on health and safety. Larger fires, in particular, tend to produce greater volumes of smoke compared to smaller recreational fires, which can adversely affect neighboring property owners. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends one of the two following options, with the second option being the preference. 1. Amend City Code to specifically identify which properties are eligible for permitted burns in the community. This could be acreage-based, zoning clarification, etc. 2. Eliminate the permitted burns process, unless conducted by a Minnesota DNR approved contractor, across the entirety of the community. Neither of these options will impact a property owner's ability to have a recreational fire on their property. 22 ATTACHMENTS 23 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Budget Follow-Up Discussion File No.Item No: A.5 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Financial Sustainability SUMMARY The purpose of this work session item is to follow up on various budget items that were brought up at the July 28th work session. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION 24 ATTACHMENTS 25 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item City Council Roundtable File No.Item No: A.6 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION None Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY The quarterly roundtable is time for the City Council to discuss items of interest, propose new items for review, and ask general questions of staff/each other. Items with interest from at least two Councilmembers may be scheduled for research by staff, future work sessions, or other action as appropriate. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION Items submitted for possible discussion. The City Council can choose to discuss some or all items. Citizen Action Requests Balakrishna Chintaginjala, AI in agriculture, 4-day workweek 26 Kenneth Anenson, lawn repair (resolved) Allison Kelly, watermain break Items should generally have the support of at least two council members to continue discussion and/or have staff research. BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Roundtable Process Overview 27 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL Roundtable Overviewand Guidelines The quarterly roundtable is scheduled time for the City Council to discuss items of interest, propose new items for review, and ask general questions of staff/each other. Timing: Quarterly, at a work session. Procedure: Councilmembers may submit items for consideration and publication in the council packet by noon on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. Be prepared to give a brief overview of proposed items at the work session. Actions: The City Council should determine the next steps, using the following menu of options: 1. Do nothing at this time 2. Park for discussion during the Strategic Plan update in January 3. Request staff prepare an issue paper (requires two votes of support) 4. Refer to a commission for further consideration (requires two votes of support) 5. Schedule a city council work session (requires three votes of support) CITY OF CHANHASSEN A Community For Life. 28 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Future Work Session Schedule File No.Item No: A.7 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY The City Council is tentatively scheduled to hold the following work sessions: October 13, 2025 Resolve General Fund Budget Items Fire Department Staffing and Facility Update Lake Minnewashta Slow-No Wake lake level Sign Code - projecting sign October 28, 2025 Presentation of Capital Fund Budgets and 2025-2029 CIP Pleasantview Road project November 18, 2025 Presentation of Preliminary 2025 Utility Fund Budgets and 2025-2029 Utility Fund CIP 29 November 25, 2025 Final Review of Proposed 2025 Levy, Budgets, and CIP for all funds Hwy 41 and Lake Lucy LRIP grant application December 15, 2025 Pending items: Sign Code updates Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center planning workshops Elections Lake Ann Park Preserve trail project update BACKGROUND Staff or the City Council may suggest topics for work sessions. Dates are tentative until the meeting agenda is published. Work sessions are typically held at 5:30 p.m. in conjunction with the regular City Council meeting, but may be scheduled for other times as needed. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 30 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Congratulations on Civic Campus Phase I completion, and welcome to the new Council Chambers File No.Item No: C.1 Agenda Section PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY As we hold the first City Council building in this new space, the centerpiece of our new Civic Campus, we observe a proud moment for Chanhassen. Resident feedback told us that the old City Hall (built in 1981) no longer met the needs of our growing community. Today’s opening is not just a replacement—it is a reimagining. This building represents our shared vision for the future and our commitment to serving residents better. The Civic Campus will invigorate downtown, provide gathering spaces, and encourage private investment. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION 31 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 32 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item District 112 Referendum - Dr. Erin Rathke, Superintendent of District 112 Schools File No.Item No: C.2 Agenda Section PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS Prepared By Jenny Potter, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 33 Chanhassen City Council Referendum Presentation 34 Referendum 2025 Chanhassen City Council DR. ERIN RATHKE | SEPTEMBER 22, 2025 district112.org/vote2025 35 Our Community Supports Our Schools 2025 community surveys consistently show that residents and parents believe our students receive high quality education from great teachers. RATE THE QUALITY OF ECCS SCHOOLS AS EXCELLENT OR GOOD 87% AGREE THE COMMUNITY RECEIVES A GOOD VALUE FOR ITS INVESTMENT IN LOCAL SCHOOLS 84% OF FAMILIES SAY THAT THEIR CHILD(REN) RECEIVE A WELL-ROUNDED EDUCATION THAT PREPARES THEM FOR THEIR FUTURE 95% 36 Financial Future RESPONSIBLE STEWARDSHIP OF SCHOOL FUNDS district112.org/vote2025 37 Financial Reality A convergence of factors have lead to expenditures outpacing revenue. FUNDING HASN’T KEPT PACE WITH INFLATION RISING COSTS AND INCREASED SALARY AND BENEFITS HAVE PUT INCREASING PRESSURE ON THE BUDGET BUDGET CUTS, COST CONTAINMENT, AND OTHER WORK TO INCREASE OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY HAVE BROUGHT SOME STABILITY TO THE FUND BALANCE, BUT CONTINUED INSTABILITY AT THE FEDERAL AND STATE LEVEL COUPLED WITH LONG STANDING FUNDING GAPS, HAVE CREATED A SITUATION WHERE EXPENSES CONTINUE TO OUTPACE REVENUE district112.org/vote2025 38 State Funding GENERAL FUND REVENUE SOURCES Changes in state funding for school districts over the last 20+ years has changed the funding needs at the local level. 2002-03 2023-24 39 Student Centered Spending 80¢ of each dollar goes to classrooms, instruction & support of students 40 November Referendum The Board has approved one question to address the need for operating revenue. 10-year levy to increase the general education revenue by $742 PER PUPIL, subject to an annual increase at the rate of inflation. Tax impact on the average homeowner* would be: * $500,000 value home $23 PER MONTH 41 If the operating levy IS APPROVED: Stable funding for a strong future and priorities identified in the district’s strategic plan Sustain academic opportunities and support for all learners through strong classroom instruction, targeted resources, and meaningful enrichment Enhance gifted and talented programming at the elementary level, protect the investment in and growth of advanced academics at the middle level, and invest in additional counseling support at the high school level to address mental health needs and career and college pathways. 42 If the operating levy IS NOT APPROVED: The district would need to cut $6.5 million over four years to maintain an 8% fund balance. Potential cuts could include: ⎻Increased class sizes ⎻Reduction of music offerings, including elimination of 5th grade band ⎻Elimination of kindergarten paraprofessionals ⎻Reduction of media specialists ⎻Reduction of elementary gifted and talented programming ⎻Impacts to staffing supporting high school athletics and activities 43 2025 Tax Impact The tax impact on a $500,000 home - the average home value for the district - would be $23 per month. HOME VALUE COST PER MONTH COST PER YEAR $200,000 $9/month $111/year $350,000 $16/month $194/year $500,000*$23/month $278/year $700,000 $32/month $389/year $1,000,000 $46/month $555/year * Average home value for the district Find your tax impact at district112.org/vote2025 44 Tax Impact Distribution EXAMPLE: $800 TAX LEVY As a growing community, the tax base continues to grow. The actual tax impact historically decreases over time. This is a representation of the distribution of funds within the community and does not depict actual numbers. This example would be $200 per property. This example would be $100 per property 45 How We Would Measure Up 46 Vote on or before November 4, 2025 Vote early in person starting Sept. 19 at the Carver County Government Center Vote early by mail starting Sept. 19, request a ballot at eccs.mn/absenteeballot Vote in person on Nov. 4 at these polling locations: ●Carver City Hall ●Chanhassen Recreation Center ●Chaska Event Center ●Victoria Recreation Center 47 EMAIL ECCSVote@district112.org VISIT district112.org/vote2025 CALL 952-556-6107 Prepared and paid for by Eastern Carver County Schools. This publication is not circulated on behalf of any candidate or ballot question. 48 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Approve City Council Special Work Session Minutes dated September 4, 2025 File No.Item No: D.1 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Jenny Potter, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the City Council Special Work Session Minutes dated September 4, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Chanhassen City Council approve the City Council Special Work Session minutes dated September 4, 2025. 49 ATTACHMENTS City Council Special Work Session minutes dated September 4, 2025 50 1 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES September 4, 2025 Mayor Ryan called the work session to order at 11:30 a.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilmember von Oven, Councilmember Kimber, Councilmember McDonald, Councilmember Schubert COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager; Jerry Ruegemer, Parks Director; Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director; Eric Maass, Community Development Director; Samantha DiMaggio, Economic Development Manager; Jodi Sarles, Recreation Center Manager; Priya Wall, Recreation Manager; Jenny Potter, City Clerk PUBLIC PRESENT: Trace Jacques, BKV; Mike Healy, BKV; Mike Genzrator, BKV; Paul Michell, BKV; Brad Barickman, RJM; and other representatives from BKV, RJM, SFC, and Generator Studios. Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center Representatives from BKV, RJM, SFC, and Generator Studios gave an overview of three options for the Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center. After discussion, the City Council decided option 1 was the plan to move forward with. The City Council noted that staying within budget is a priority. They would also like to have more information on the projected revenue of the community center. Mayor Ryan adjourned the work session at 12:55 p.m. Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen City Manager Prepared by Jenny Potter City Clerk 51 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Approve City Council Meeting Minutes dated September 8, 2025 File No.Item No: D.2 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Jenny Potter, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the City Council Meeting minutes dated September 8, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Chanhassen City Council approve the City Council Meeting minutes dated September 8, 2025. 52 ATTACHMENTS City Council Meeting Minutes dated September 8, 2025 53 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 8, 2025 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilmember McDonald, Councilmember von Oven, and Councilmember Kimber. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilmember Schubert. STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Eric Maass, Community Development Director; Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director; and Jenny Potter, City Clerk. PUBLIC PRESENT: Jeff Wong, 1674 Hemlock Way Erin Wong, 1674 Hemlock Way PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: 1. Teen Volunteer Recognition Mayor Ryan recognized the Teen Volunteers who served in various city-sponsored recreation programs from June through August. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilmember McDonald moved, Councilmember von Oven seconded that the City Council approve the following consent agenda items 1 through 9 pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated August 25, 2025 2. Approve City Council Work Session Minutes dated August 25, 2025 3. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated August 12, 2025 4. Receive Park and Recreation Commission Minutes dated July 22, 2025 5. Receive Commission on Aging Minutes dated June 20, 2025 6. Approve Claims Paid dated September 8, 2025 7. Appoint Youth Commissioner to Environmental Commission 54 City Council Minutes –September 8, 2025 2 8. Award Professional Service Agreement for the 2025 Annual Pavement Inspection and Condition Rating Services 9. Extension of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) previously issued for a contractor’s yard at 1591 Park Road All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. None. PUBLIC HEARINGS. None. GENERAL BUSINESS. 1. Approve the Final Plat and Development Contract for Pioneer Ridge (Planning Case 25-01) Eric Maass, Community Development Director, reviewed the final plat for Pioneer Ridge, addressing the grading and stormwater management concerns and the vehicular sight lines to Bluff Creek Boulevard. He reviewed specific questions received since it had been posted. He stated that the city determined that all deciduous and coniferous trees with a 10-inch DBH caliper or larger needed to be included in the tree survey. He stated that the anticipated construction schedule would be to clear trees, mass grade, and relocate utilities in Fall 2025, apply for a possible model home permit in winter 2025, and start home construction in spring 2026. He commented that the neighbors’ fire pit and trampoline removal needed to be determined between the two private properties, but MnDOT notified adjacent property owners that the encroachments needed to be removed. He stated that the city would approve construction plans and require as-built certification from the Engineer of Record, and require financial securities to ensure projects are built according to approved plans, which helps answer drainage concerns. Mayor Ryan asked what the established warranties were for the project. Mr. Maass answered that the city required the trees to be planted, and they would have a two-year warranty. If they do not survive, they must be replanted. Charlie Howley, City Engineer, answered that public utilities had a two-year warranty. Mayor Ryan stated that residents had concerns with drainage, and she asked what would happen if things resettled and there were drainage issues. She asked if there was a recourse for residents or the city. Mr. Howley answered that issues are often noticed within the construction phase or before the securities are released. He said if things change in five years, the city will investigate the change and take the proper actions. He stated that a property owner needed to get permits to make changes, so the city would know about the changes. He commented that if things generally work right away, they will work in the future. 55 City Council Minutes –September 8, 2025 3 Mayor Ryan asked if the berm was still a part of the project. Mr. Howley answered that there was a berm throughout the northwest property line, but he did not have the grading plan in front of him. Mayor Ryan asked if residents continued to be concerned about the speed and if the traffic team would look at it. She asked how they should proceed with the speed question. Mr. Howley answered that the road met the current speed limit requirements, but Bluff Creek Drive was on their regular speed trailer schedule, so they would keep monitoring the roadway. He stated that they proactively stripped fog lanes on the road. He invited concerned residents to reach out to the traffic safety committee. Mayor Ryan asked that they consider the continuity, since driving through a commercial area, the speed limit was 30 miles per hour, but in the residential area, the speed limit was 35 miles per hour. Mayor Ryan invited residents who had questions to come forward and share them with the City Council. Jeff Wong, 1674 Hemlock Way, asked about the sight-line verification. He asked how the verification was conducted to confirm that the grading was sufficient. Erin Wong, 1674 Hemlock Way, thanked them for paving along Lyman and Powers Boulevard. She asked if they would close the Pioneer Trail walking path and Bluff Creek sidewalk during construction. She stated that people had moved since MnDOT put the land up for sale, so she asked if new residents were informed about moving the encroachments. She stated she wanted to make sure the drainage was completed correctly on Lot 14. Mr. Howley stated that there was a requirement for an as-built survey, so they could complete a desk top analysis of the site line, which they had done to date. He commented that the staff can also go out there if the new private street seems correct. He stated they would have to ask the developer about whether they are closing down the paths. Mr. Maass answered that they might have a better idea of their construction staging, so they could ask the developer. He stated that if properties were turned over since the land was sold, the buyers should be aware that the project was occurring. He commented that they could work with the applicant to send a letter to residents about when they planned to mobilize. Mayor Ryan suggested putting dates in the update letter for those who subscribe to the project page. She asked about the drainage on lot 14. Mr. Howley stated he did not know if the house would look weird if it were shorter, but the units would look identical. He commented that they might see a retaining wall behind lot 14 to allow a swale to get by. He said that since the house was less deep, it would help with drainage. He commented on the trickier drainage part within the outlot, since the swale became tighter and shallower. 56 City Council Minutes –September 8, 2025 4 John Anderson, Brandl Anderson, discussed that the access roads would need to be connected, so there would be a short period of time during which they would be closed, and they would put up signs about the issues. He stated they plan to do the grading and tree removal this fall and wait to close the trails until the spring. He stated that the overhead powerline would happen in 2026, so they would have to do some grading and utility relocation before this time. He stated that the seller should disclose to the buyers about a pending plat, but they can do a neighbor notification about the timing. He discussed Lot 14 drainage and that the pad depths vary, and that they will do a shorter house in the location. He commented that the common area was owned by the Homeowners Association, so there would be a specific point of contact concerning drainage. He said that they had a copy of the development agreement, and the small details were set. Mayor Ryan asked if there were any changes in the development contract. Mr. Maass answered that there were no substantial changes. Councilmember von Oven moved, Councilmember McDonald seconded that the Chanhassen City Council approves the requested final plat and development contract with minor modifications as may be approved by the city attorney for the Pioneer Ridge Subdivision, subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. 2. Resolution 2025-61: Awarding Sale of $10,205,00 GO Tax Abatement and Capital Improvement Bonds, Series 2025B Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director, introduced Nick Anhut from Ehlers to summarize the results of the bond sale. Nick Anhut, a representative from Ehlers, summarized the nine bids received for the authorization of the bonds. He stated that the winning bid was from Hilltop Securities. He stated that there was a good turnout for the bond sale. He summarized the financial impacts, which would deliver $10,344,202 in net proceeds for the project. He reviewed the final action and consideration. Councilmember Kimber moved, Councilmember von Oven seconded that the Chanhassen City Council adopt Resolution 2025-XX Awarding authorizing the issuance and awarding the sale of $10,205,00 General Obligation Tax Abatement and Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Series 2025B and pledging for the security thereof, tax abatements, and levying a tax for the payment thereof. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. 3. Resolution 2025-62: Approving the Preliminary 2025 Tax Levy, Collectible in 2026, and Establishing the Truth-in-Taxation Public Meeting Date 57 City Council Minutes –September 8, 2025 5 Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director, summarized the changes discussed in the City Council work sessions. She noted that the current general fund budget was balanced and that there would be a projected 7.2 percent increase from the Pay 2025 Levy lost month, with the hope of reducing the final levy to 6.9 percent. She reviewed the increases for the 2026 General Fund Budget, including the wages and benefits. She reviewed additional increases, such as the primary and general elections, the sheriff’s contract, contingency, and non-wage/benefit expenditures. She summarized the preliminary 2026 General Fund Budget. She provided an overview of the outlook for the special revenue funds, capital funds, and utility funds. She explained the updated property tax levy projections. She summarized how the levy would impact the taxes for different properties in the city. She compared the proposed levy increases with those of other cities. She reviewed the budget calendar for the City Council regarding the tax levy. Councilmember von Oven asked about the decrease in a particular year of funding for the pavement management program. He asked if the decrease did not indicate a decrease in the number of projects. Ms. Grinnell confirmed that there was adequate funding to do all the projects that were planned. Councilmember von Oven asked if there was danger in losing health insurance because they do not want to give it to us at the price. Ms. Grinnell answered that they were legally obligated to cover the city employees until the end of 2026. Councilmember von Oven moved, Councilmember McDonald seconded that the Chanhassen City Council adopt a Resolution Approving the Preliminary 2025 Tax Levy Collectible in 2026, and Establishing the Truth-in-Taxation Public Meeting Date. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. None. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. None. 1. Second Quarter 2025 Economic Development Activity Report Councilmember Kimber moved, Councilmember von Oven seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen City Manager Prepared by Jenny Potter City Clerk 58 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Approve City Council Work Session Minutes dated September 8, 2025 File No.Item No: D.3 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Jenny Potter, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the City Council Work Session Minutes dated September 8, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Chanhassen City Council approve the City Council Work Session minutes dated September 8, 2025. 59 ATTACHMENTS City Council Work Session Minutes dated September 8, 2025 60 1 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES September 8, 2025 Mayor Ryan called the work session to order at 6:30 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilmember McDonald, Councilmember von Oven, Councilmember Kimber COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilmember Schubert STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager; Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Eric Maas, Planning Director; Patrick Gavin, Communications Manager; Jenny Potter, City Clerk; Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director PUBLIC PRESENT: Presentation of Preliminary 2026 Levy and General Fund Budget Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director, gave a recap of previous work session discussions. Ms. Grinnell presented an updated draft showing balanced revenues and expenditures, with overall spending projected to rise 4.8 percent from 2025. Much of the increase stems from wages and benefits, including a projected 3 percent cost-of-living adjustment, step increases for eligible employees, a new state requirement for paid family leave, and a capped 15 percent rise in health insurance premiums. The Sheriff’s contract and election costs are also expected to grow, with the latter reflecting both a primary and general election year. The City Council reviewed expenditures across major functions, with public safety accounting for the largest share at more than $6.1 million. Revenues are projected to match expenditures at $16.9 million, with property taxes providing the largest portion, and licenses, permits, and service charges also increasing. Ms. Grinnell noted that favorable bond results allowed the projected levy increase to fall from 7.2 percent to 6.9 percent, but the Council ultimately voted to set the preliminary levy at 7.2 percent, expressing the intent to bring it below 7 percent by December when the final levy is adopted. For residents, the average market value of homes rose 4.5 percent for taxes payable in 2026, with a median-valued home of $501,600 expected to see an annual city tax increase of about $75. Commercial properties saw much smaller value growth and therefore less impact. Ms. Grinnell also showed a comparison to other metro-area cities. Chanhassen is near the lower end of proposed levy increases, with only a handful of cities projecting smaller hikes. Discussion also turned to Carver County’s request that Chanhassen offer in-person absentee voting at City Hall beginning in 2026. While the service would improve convenience for residents, the city would need to cover most of the long-term costs through added staffing and election judges. 61 City Council Work Session Minutes – September 8, 2025 2 Councilmembers voiced support for voter access but were cautious about the financial and staffing burdens. Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager, discussed the need to plan for a new fire engine in 2029, pointing to rising costs and long backlogs nationwide. While not part of the 2026 budget, councilmembers emphasized the importance of addressing these capital needs early. The preliminary levy and Truth-in-Taxation hearing will be held on December 15, when the final levy and budget will be set. Discuss Accessory Structure Ordinance for Agricultural Buildings Eric Maas, Planning Director, reviewed a draft ordinance related to accessory structures on agricultural properties, prompted by a request to construct a 5,000-square-foot farm building. Current code limits accessory structures in both residential and agricultural districts to 1,000 square feet, regardless of parcel size. Staff explained that under Minnesota law, agricultural buildings are exempt from building permits but must still comply with zoning standards. The proposed amendment would remove the 1,000-square-foot cap for agricultural buildings in the Agricultural Estate (A2) district, while requiring them to meet all other standards such as setbacks and impervious surface limits. Councilmembers were generally supportive of the proposed amendment for agricultural buildings but voiced an interest in reviewing the size limitation more broadly based on a recent citizen action request submitted to the city. The City Council will revisit the topic at their September 22nd work session. Mayor Ryan adjourned the work session at 6:58 P.M. Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen City Manager Prepared by Jenny Potter City Clerk 62 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated September 2, 2025 File No.Item No: D.4 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Amy Weidman, Senior Admin Support Specialist Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council receives the Planning Commission minutes dated September 2, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 63 Planning Commission minutes dated September 2, 2025 64 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 2, 2025 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Noyes called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Eric Noyes, Steve Jobe, Jeremy Rosengren, Ryan Soller, Mike Olmstead, Dave Grover, and Katie Trevena. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Rachel Arsenault, Associate Planner; Eric Maass, Community Development Director; Rachel Jeske, Planner; and Joe Seidl, Water Resource Engineer. PUBLIC PRESENT: Deena Laugen Pioneer Trail Joy Gora Chanhassen, MN Linda Boerboom 2020 Clover Court Eric Reiners Eden Prairie, MN Logan Stein Plymouth, MN Andrew Altstatt Lakeville, MN C Henson Prior Lake, MN Scot Lacek Chanhassen, MN PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. CONSIDER A VARIANCE FOR A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 3630 HICKORY ROAD (PLANNING CASE #25-13) Rachel Arsenault, Associate Planner, reviewed Planning Case #2025-13 for rebuilding a garage at 3630 Hickory Road. She stated that the location was in the Red Cedar Point Neighborhood and was zoned residential single-family with a low-density residential land use. She noted specific lot attributes, including that it was 0.24 acres, 40 feet wide, bisected by Hickory Road, and was platted in 1913. She noted that the lot size is smaller than what is required by today’s standards. She explained the layout of the proposed garage, which would take the place of the existing garage. The expansion portion beyond what currently exists results in a variance that needs to be approved in order for the garage to be constructed as proposed. She said that the side setbacks were the same as the current setbacks. She reviewed the variance criteria and stated that the proposed garage met the criteria. Commissioner Jobe asked about the ten-foot drop on the topographical and if there would be any special landscaping built into the plan. Mrs. Arsenault answered that topographical changes 65 Planning Commission Minutes – September 2, 2025 2 would be addressed in the building plans, but any structures with the variance would have to meet the setbacks proposed in this variance plan. Chairman Noyes said that the owner is doing what they can reasonably do with the property, so the proposal seems the best way to go about it. Chairman Noyes opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. Chairman Noyes closed the public hearing. Commissioner Jobe moved, Commissioner Rosengren seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves the requested decreased side yard setbacks, subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. 2. CONSIDER A SITE PLAN AND VARIANCE FOR A MEMORY CARE FACILITY AT 1620 ARBORETUM BLV (#25-10) Rachel Jeske, Planner, stated that Planning Case #2025-10 would go before the Planning Commission tonight and the City Council on September 22. She stated that the proposed development location is zoned high-density residential now and in the 2040 Land Use Guidance. She stated that the Moments of Chanhassen project was approved in January 2020, and the Eden Springs proposal was applied for in August 2025. She reviewed the proposed communications, including the proposed development sign placed on the property, an email sent on various dates to the proposed development's email group, postcards sent to neighbors within 500 feet, and a public hearing notice posted in the Sun Sailor. Ms. Jeske summarized the level of city discretion in approving or denying a site plan and noted that it was a quasi-judicial decision. She reviewed the definition of a continuing care facility and the standards required by the city. She noted the proposed architecture and the landscaping and stated that the planting plan did not meet the planting diversity requirements and would need to be updated before final construction plan approval. She commented that the proposed lighting plan meets the standards, and the proposed light pole height was less than 35 feet. She commented that the project requested a variance for the front yard parking setback and the wetland setback. She stated that the applicant proposed 30 parking spaces, including two garage stalls. She reviewed the variance standards and provided additional details about the variance requests. She noted that Riley Creek was located along the northern edge of the site, and that a reasonable solution was to average the buffer around the wetlands and reduce the setback in return. The second variance request was the reduced parking setback, and the applicant noted that they would provide adequate screening to accomplish the intent of the ordinance, but the wetland made it difficult to meet the 25-foot setback in the front of the property. She provided an overview of the utilities and stated that sanitary and water main services were located adjacent to the site. She commented that staff would require the water main to be looped within the site 66 Planning Commission Minutes – September 2, 2025 3 rather than accessing it in two separate locations. She stated the project would be required to connect to the sewer line in the adjacent city right-of-way if an easement is not acquired. Joe Seidl, Water Resources Engineer, stated that the site is currently undeveloped and is similar to an open prairie with a wooded area. He stated that a majority of the site runoff went directly into Riley Creek, and some of the runoff on the southern end of the project made its way to West 78th Street. He stated that there was one jurisdictional wetland onsite near the center of the site, which made development difficult. He stated that it was a managed type two and that the wetland and creek buffer was in poor condition because of debris and buckthorn. He stated that the project would maintain the major flow patterns and that there would be 58,000 square feet of new impervious area. He stated that the project would meet stormwater requirements for abstraction, rate control, and water quality by means of the filtration system and the jellyfish filter system. He commented that a wetland delineation was approved in May 2025, which found that there were 0.08 acres of a type 1/2 wetland adjacent and upgradient to Riley Creek. He stated that due to the site constraints, the applicant proposed placing the building within the wetland building setback. He stated that the proposed plans show a minimum buffer associated with a managed two-wetland classification, and the building and sidewalks were well within the 30-foot setback measured from the buffer edge, which requires a variance. He stated that the wetland delineators go out and determine the wetland line, and the Technical Evaluation Panel reviews the information. He said that the Water Resource department recommends an enhanced buffer reestablishment plan, which meets City Code 20-412, and the plan does have notes to the effect within the plan set. Ms. Jeske said that the site plan meets all the requirements for the site plan review. Commissioner Rosengren asked them to indicate where the back edge of the building would be. Mr. Seidl explained that the back end of the building would sit near a specific contour. Commissioner Jobe asked about City Code and water, and if they would use a retention pond for stormwater management, and if they would require or allow any fencing. He specifically referred to an individual with dementia entering the pond. Mr. Seidl said that it was a filtration basin; it should be dry most of the time, but a fence or other landscaping could be allowed by City Code. Commissioner Soller asked if there were additional requirements that the site would have to meet for the watershed district. Mr. Seidl responded that the site received conditional approval from the watershed district. He said that the watershed district had similar buffer requirements but allowed more averaging. He stated that the watershed district did not have any setback requirements, but the city does, which requires a variance. Commissioner Soller asked if averaging was spelled out in City Code to understand what was allowable, or if it was just best practice. Mr. Seidl answered that it was left to staff discretion, but the watershed district had a stricter methodology for the minimum buffer widths. Commissioner Soller asked if, given the trade-off in exchange for the variance, the city would receive a net benefit with the increased quality of the creek and buffer. Mr. Seidl confirmed this information. He said that they manage the impervious area, so they would balance the building 67 Planning Commission Minutes – September 2, 2025 4 being close to the wetland and the creek by buffering around the wetland. He said that there were areas outside of the wetland buffer, and they would look to them to establish native vegetation. Chairman Noyes asked about removing the buckthorn and construction debris, if there were any long-term maintenance requirements, and how they would be included. Mr. Seidl said it was discussed and outlined in the City Code. He requires that the applicants follow the MnDOT seeding manual, which provides a maintenance plan of three years for planting, prepping, mowing, and weeding until the establishment is complete. He stated it would be up to the owner of the site to maintain the area to meet the standards of the City Code. He said if the commissioners desired more from the applicant to ensure that it was taken care of, it could be added to the maintenance plan. Commissioner Olmstead asked how access management is regulated by the city. Ms. Jeske answered that the city engineer and the subdivision ordinance provides guidance on access management. Commissioner Olmstead asked who made the final decisions. He voiced concerns about two access points on a 40-mile-per-hour road, but it is coming from a controlled intersection with an all-way stop, and MnDOT did not express concerns about the plan. He said he was excited about access management, but he was not excited about the access point one hundred feet from a controlled intersection. Ms. Jeske said that the City Engineer determines the final plan. Commissioner Trevena said that they discussed the conditions outlined in the staff report that they want to be a part of the variance, and when they would see the conditions. She asked about the enhanced buffer and the developer’s responsibility. Ms. Jeske said that by approving the variance with the staff’s proposed conditions, they would apply to the variance approval. Commissioner Rosengren noted that this was reviewed and accepted by the city, but if they discovered anything, they are doing better this time around with the requirements and site review, even though the proposal was similar. Ms. Jeske responded that the variance proposals and the way the staff reviewed them were similar, but the staff previously recommended a five- foot wetland setback, when zero was originally proposed, which the new applicant included with their request. Deena Laugen, the applicant, stated that Eden Springs had a purpose to create a small home-like community in a luxury boutique setting. She stated that many people were hesitant when taking the first step to assisted living or memory care. She said it would be a place people can spend time together, building relationships and a community, and they can tailor the care to the individual. She stated that they would feel like it is the resident’s home, and they just work there. She reviewed the two current types assisted living homes in the market, like large apartments and retrofitted homes. She said that Eden Springs would be a different option and would fit the needed middle. She stated that loneliness was present in the elderly population, and individuals would not be isolated in their rooms. She commented that they were designed to spend the day interacting with everybody. She said that they would have a more favorable resident and 68 Planning Commission Minutes – September 2, 2025 5 caregiver ratio. She expressed excitement in bringing Eden Springs to Chanhassen to allow residents to experience a city for life. Chairman Noyes opened the public hearing. Joy Gora welcomed Deena Laugen to the industry. She wished her the best of luck and noted that there were a lot of rules and requirements. She stated that their industry always had staff shortages. She said that there are 1,900 assisted living homes in Minnesota. She said that people would need to tour multiple places to see the differences. She commented that there are tremendously great individuals in the industry. She said that she would face challenges in Chanhassen. She encouraged that the staff ratio was a quality ratio, so she did not look like a predator in the industry. She thought the location would be a wonderful place to have a dementia unit. She stated that if a dementia client slipped out of the facility, they would likely have a wander guard on the patient. She commented that if they left the facility, they hoped they would receive support from the sheriff’s department to locate the client. Linda Boerboom, 2020 Clover Court, stated that she traveled the frontage road every day. She expressed concerns about dementia with the street out there and if there would be any safeguards put in place to protect the drivers on the road and the residents. She asked if they would need gates or to reduce speed in that area. She expressed concern because they have winters in Minnesota, so there could be ice. She commented that the plot of land was very small. She said she wanted to look at safety. Deena Laugen mentioned on the site plan in the back, there would be gates with locks, along with locks on any exterior door. She stated that there was constant improvement with AI to keep residents safe while maintaining their rights. Chairman Noyes closed the public hearing. Commissioner Olmstead stated as they saw additional development and traffic demand on the roadways, they had an approach to assess the traffic and roadways. He asked about traffic control, such as four-way stops. Ms. Jeske said that all accesses are considered by the engineering team during a development proposal. She said a resident could submit concerns to the traffic safety committee about specific intersections. She stated that there were city-wide initiatives, such as speed limits. She said it was determined on a case-by-case basis. Mr. Seidl commented that there were engineering standards for sightlines and intersections for safe travel on roadways. He said there was traffic counting to see if a roadway could handle the amount of traffic proposed. He stated that the engineering department is looking at these with each development. He commented that they are looking at these things to make sure they do not impede traffic and that residents stay safe. Commissioner Soller stated that as development happens, roadways will get busier. He commented that certain areas of the city meet engineering standards, but not the expectations of residents who want to live in a safe and quiet neighborhood. He wants to understand the process. 69 Planning Commission Minutes – September 2, 2025 6 Commissioner Grover said that there was a large area that was farmland west of the property. He asked about what uses were allowed for the area and if this was compatible with other developments that might occur. Ms. Jeske said that the 2040 comprehensive plan was guided for residential and housing, but it would be dependent on the landowner. She said that the guidance could change in the future. Chairman Noyes commented that they received three emailed public comments about the case. He summarized the first, which thought that the development was too close to Lake Ann Park, another that said the cost of memory care was too high, and the third wanted a golf course. He stated that the Planning Commission had to make sure the site plan and variances met the requirements of the city code. He commented that they were not here to make a judgment on the good or bad of the proposal. Commissioner Soller stated that any project that would have a traffic impact or impact on pedestrians, he asked if they could highlight whether this project would provide a net or neutral benefit to pedestrian access along the road. Ms. Jeske responded that the additions would be two driveways and additional landscaping. She said it was a net neutral benefit to pedestrians. Commissioner Soller clarified that both access points would have a pedestrian crosswalk through the access point. Ms. Jeske confirmed they will likely have crosswalks across them. Commissioner Soller asked if this was a requirement in the City Code. Ms. Jeske answered that it was up to the discretion of the engineering department. Commissioner Rosengren said a similar plan was previously approved. Chairman Noyes asked if they needed to have a written-out condition related to the landscaping maintenance plan. Ms. Jeske answered that the water resources department did a good job with their plans but asked for feedback from Mr. Seidl. Mr. Seidl answered that the watershed district required a buffer management plan, so he thought they would be covered. He did not see an issue with the applicant since they have to work with the watershed district. Commissioner Olmstead moved, Commissioner Rosengren seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission approve the requested variances and recommended approval of the requested site plan for the 42-bed Eden Springs Assisted Living & Memory Care facility, subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0, with Commissioner Jobe abstaining from this item. GENERAL BUSINESS: 1. EXTENSION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) PREVIOUSLY ISSUED FOR A CONTRACTOR’S YARD AT 1591 PARK ROAD 70 Planning Commission Minutes – September 2, 2025 7 Rachel Arsenault, Associate Planner, reviewed Planning Case #2024-09, which is requesting an extension to the conditional use permit for a contractor’s yard at 1591 Park Road. She stated that the new owner purchased the property in the winter and was working through the stormwater management plan to move on to the permit to install stormwater management, gutters, and paving. She stated that the lapse condition was nearing for the conditional use permit and that the staff recommends a one-year extension to the conditional use permit. Commissioner Jobe moved, Commissioner Trevena seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council grant the proposed conditional use permit extension for the contracting yard at 1591 Park Road. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED AUGUST 12, 2025 Commissioner Soller moved, and Commissioner Grover seconded to approve the Chanhassen Planning Commission summary minutes dated August 12, 2025, as presented. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS: None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS: Eric Maass, Community Development Director, stated that the city remains on schedule to move into the new City Hall building, so the September 16 meeting will likely be held in the new City Hall. Chairman Noyes asked about a picture of the Planning Commission in the new meeting. Mr. Maass asked if all were available, and if not, they would target the first meeting in October for a photograph. Commissioner Jobe asked when the city approves a site plan with tree covers and a mature tree was damaged and was likely to die, what would happen. Mr. Maass responded that they require a grading fence and a tree save fence to protect the root area of the tree from grading activities. He said that if grading activities occur outside of where it was supposed to be or the fencing is not installed and trees that were required to be saved are removed, then the development contract stipulates penalties such as replanting at a two-to-one ratio. Commissioner Soller asked if there was an agenda for the September 16 meeting. Mr. Maass confirmed the information. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION: None. OPEN DISCUSSION: None. 71 Planning Commission Minutes – September 2, 2025 8 ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Jobe moved, Commissioner Trevena seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:10 p.m. Submitted by Eric Maass Community Development Director 72 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Receive Environmental Commission Minutes dated July 9, 2025 File No.Item No: D.5 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Amy Weidman, Senior Admin Support Specialist Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council receives Environmental Commission Minutes dated July 9, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Environmental Commission Minutes dated July 9, 2025 73 Chanhassen Environmental Commission (EC) 6:00 pm July 9, 2025 Members Present: Scott Grefe, Leslie Elhadi, Paget Pengelly, Sidney Lindmark, Glenn Stolar Members Absent: Billy Cripe, John Stutzman, Wren Roemer Staff Present: Jamie Marsh, Environmental Resource Specialist Visitors: None Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. Minutes The commissioners reviewed the meeting minutes from the April meeting. Commissioner Stolar moved to approve the April 9, 2025 meeting minutes as written; Commissioner Lindmark seconded. The motion passed 5-0. Discussion Items 1. Environmental Academy Jamie Marsh, Environmental Resource Specialist, confirmed that the Environmental Commission will continue the partnership with Carver County for the 2025 Environmental Academy series. The series will host six events at a mix of indoor and outdoor locations. Camp Fire Minnesota is confirmed for September 11 at 6 p.m. to host one of the six events. Carver County will lead three of the six events, specifically the events related to waste reduction. The Commission discussed topics for the events, including a presentation event at the Arboretum, a biochar demonstration, recycling night, Reuse Minnesota, touring the Environmental Center, and touring the new organics recycling facility, Dakota Prairie Composting. Commissioners thought that when the library is used for the presentation, a varied supply of visual aids would be engaging for the reuse and recycling events. The commissioners discussed new ways to market to specific audiences, while still including a broad audience. They might invite representatives from multi-family housing complexes or youth groups. The Arboretum suggested an event discussing either the recovery of endangered plants from development sites to replant or developing urban climate-resistant trees. The event could be held at the Arboretum and admission would be included. Being held at the Arboretum was agreed to be a good plan as it might increase interest. 74 After discussing the various options and previous events, it was decided that the three events planned by the Environmental Commission would include the trail walk at Camp Fire Minnesota; biochar, either as an outdoor demonstration at Lake Ann or an indoor presentation; and the discussion of recovering plants from development and construction sites, which would be held at the Farm at the Arboretum. The Carver County-led events would include a recycling night in which people can learn about frequently asked questions regarding recycling, a discussion led by Reuse Minnesota, and an organics facility tour at Dakota Prairie. The commission agreed that in 2026, the Arboretum’s urban climate-resistant trees could be revisited as a topic, along with electric cars, or repeat tours that had been done previously. The next steps will be confirming dates, marketing the events, and managing which commissioners can attend which events. The hope is to schedule the Arboretum event for September 4, before the fall colors increase crowds at that location. 2. Educational Topics for Fall Ms. Marsh discussed the Communications team videos on social media. The Environmental Commission has an opportunity to reach out regarding environmental topics. A video showing how to clean a storm drain was suggested as a helpful topic. Erosion control and silt fences on work sites and road work sites could be discussed. The idea to plug trivia night and environmental academy topics in the videos was suggested. Upcoming Items and Events The Commission discussed whether any upcoming events could be used for a table to promote the academy, trivia night, and the Commission itself. Community Day is coming up at the Rec Center, the Farmers’ Market happens on Saturdays, and the summer concert series were all suggested as options. Adjournment Commissioner Lindmark moved to adjourn the meeting. The commission voted 5-0, and the meeting adjourned at 7:03 p.m. Minutes prepared by Amy Weidman, Senior Administrative Support Specialist Minutes Submitted by Jamie Marsh, Environmental Resource Specialist 75 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Approve Claims Paid dated September 22, 2025 File No.Item No: D.6 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Danielle Washburn, Assistant Finance Director Reviewed By Kelly Grinnell SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council Approves Claims Paid dated September 22, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Financial Sustainability SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION The following claims are submitted for review and approval on September 22, 2025: Total Claims $2,073,461.19 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION 76 ATTACHMENTS Payment Summary Payment Detail 77 Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount CENTURYLINK 09/03/2025 0.00 759.88 GoTo Communications Inc 09/03/2025 0.00 2,762.12 IUOE Local #49 09/03/2025 0.00 665.00 MINNESOTA DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 09/03/2025 0.00 50.00 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 09/03/2025 0.00 128.00 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 09/03/2025 0.00 175.50 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/03/2025 0.00 4,342.27 XCEL ENERGY INC 09/03/2025 0.00 13,366.33 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 09/04/2025 0.00 85.02 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 09/04/2025 0.00 1,257.83 Boarman Kroos Vogel Group Inc 09/04/2025 0.00 88,800.37 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 09/04/2025 0.00 3,537.00 Christian & Teresa White 09/04/2025 0.00 250.00 Cintas Corporation No. 2 09/04/2025 0.00 127.62 Classic Home Enchancements 09/04/2025 0.00 500.00 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 09/04/2025 0.00 741.20 CORE & MAIN LP 09/04/2025 0.00 77.84 DISPLAY SALES COMPANY 09/04/2025 0.00 1,008.00 Earl F Andersen Inc 09/04/2025 0.00 191.00 EROSION PRODUCTS LLC 09/04/2025 0.00 240.00 Everlight Solar Construction 09/04/2025 0.00 500.00 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 09/04/2025 0.00 337.12 FASTENAL COMPANY 09/04/2025 0.00 34.52 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 09/04/2025 0.00 4,534.14 GRAYBAR 09/04/2025 0.00 2,900.00 Guard Guys, LLC 09/04/2025 0.00 27.95 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 09/04/2025 0.00 10.00 Heinen Homes Inc 09/04/2025 0.00 250.00 Holt Tour and Charter Inc 09/04/2025 0.00 865.00 Houston Engineering Inc 09/04/2025 0.00 884.50 Ideal Service Inc. 09/04/2025 0.00 4,555.50 IRRIGATION BY DESIGN INC 09/04/2025 0.00 2,197.00 KAYE L BENSON 09/04/2025 0.00 560.00 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 09/04/2025 0.00 57.50 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 09/04/2025 0.00 80,297.85 MIDWEST PLAYSCAPES 09/04/2025 0.00 185.60 MN Solar and More 09/04/2025 0.00 250.00 Mom's Landscaping & Design 09/04/2025 0.00 250.00 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 09/04/2025 0.00 219.45 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 09/04/2025 0.00 136,156.33 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 09/04/2025 0.00 119.72 Paragon Party Ponies LLC 09/04/2025 0.00 600.00 Park Construction Co 09/04/2025 0.00 222,397.38 PATRICK & KATIE BORNBACH 09/04/2025 0.00 500.00 Page 1 of 3 78 Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Peter & Shandra Tollefson 09/04/2025 0.00 500.00 Pioneer Athletics 09/04/2025 0.00 2,692.00 RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 09/04/2025 0.00 23,594.40 Rent N Save Portable Services 09/04/2025 0.00 5,445.45 Ryan Contracting Company 09/04/2025 0.00 1,225,542.46 SCOTT NELSON COACHING INC 09/04/2025 0.00 2,000.00 SEH 09/04/2025 0.00 3,925.08 Shred-N-Go Inc 09/04/2025 0.00 1,550.00 Silva Screenprinting & Dist, LLC 09/04/2025 0.00 61.63 SiteOne Landscape Supply 09/04/2025 0.00 86.03 Sun Life Financial 09/04/2025 0.00 3,872.97 Superior Construction Inc 09/04/2025 0.00 250.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 09/04/2025 0.00 12,685.00 Trinity Construction Services LLC 09/04/2025 0.00 250.00 Val Roder / Olivine Yoga LLC 09/04/2025 0.00 200.00 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 09/04/2025 0.00 213.48 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 09/04/2025 0.00 1,042.78 BCA 09/10/2025 0.00 32.00 Metronet Holdings, LLC 09/10/2025 0.00 162.76 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 09/10/2025 0.00 7,638.88 XCEL ENERGY INC 09/10/2025 0.00 25,363.79 A L Woolhouse Inc 09/11/2025 0.00 500.00 ALERT ALL CORPORATION 09/11/2025 0.00 5,210.00 All Goals Inc 09/11/2025 0.00 4,623.00 Andrew & Karen Malone 09/11/2025 0.00 500.00 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 09/11/2025 0.00 153.50 BOLTON & MENK INC 09/11/2025 0.00 8,556.73 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 09/11/2025 0.00 200.95 Carver County 09/11/2025 0.00 1,450.00 CARVER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 09/11/2025 0.00 206.64 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO 09/11/2025 0.00 587.00 Cintas Corporation No. 2 09/11/2025 0.00 50.03 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 09/11/2025 0.00 135.00 CROWN COLLEGE 09/11/2025 0.00 650.00 CUT ABOVE INC 09/11/2025 0.00 6,000.00 DENALI CUSTOM HOMES INC 09/11/2025 0.00 11,250.00 Driveby Design LLC 09/11/2025 0.00 500.00 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 09/11/2025 0.00 310.31 Empire Solar Group 09/11/2025 0.00 250.00 Enterprise FM Trust 09/11/2025 0.00 35,473.30 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 09/11/2025 0.00 152.32 Glowing Hearth & Home 09/11/2025 0.00 82.00 GONYEA HOMES 09/11/2025 0.00 750.00 Grey Duck Outdoor 09/11/2025 0.00 2,664.84 Health Strategies 09/11/2025 0.00 7,115.00 Heiman, Inc. 09/11/2025 0.00 643.15 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 09/11/2025 0.00 120.99 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 09/11/2025 0.00 772.26 Iron River Construction 09/11/2025 0.00 500.00 Jay Vanbebber 09/11/2025 0.00 250.00 Juli Al-Hilwani 09/11/2025 0.00 431.00 Life Support Innovations LLC 09/11/2025 0.00 11,155.05 M3 Planning Inc 09/11/2025 0.00 25,000.00 Page 2 of 3 79 Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Macqueen Emergency Group 09/11/2025 0.00 12.00 Mark Steine 09/11/2025 0.00 750.00 Metropolitan Area Management Association 09/11/2025 0.00 35.00 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 09/11/2025 0.00 9,840.60 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 09/11/2025 0.00 4,511.65 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 09/11/2025 0.00 10,671.83 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 09/11/2025 0.00 340.00 Murphy Bros Building 09/11/2025 0.00 250.00 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 09/11/2025 0.00 204.69 Patrick Banas 09/11/2025 0.00 500.00 POWERPLAN OIB 09/11/2025 0.00 288.87 Pro-Tree Outdoor Services 09/11/2025 0.00 560.00 Sparkle Pool Service 09/11/2025 0.00 1,000.00 Stericycle, Inc 09/11/2025 0.00 229.00 Survey Supply Inc 09/11/2025 0.00 3,071.52 Sustainable Investment Group LLC 09/11/2025 0.00 7,056.00 Titan Energy Systems 09/11/2025 0.00 4,154.00 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 09/11/2025 0.00 1,490.00 Wild Prairie Homes 09/11/2025 0.00 250.00 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 09/11/2025 0.00 369.71 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 09/11/2025 0.00 6,770.00 Report Total:0.00 2,073,461.19 Page 3 of 3 80 AP Check Detail User: dwashburn@chanhassenmn.gov Printed: 9/16/2025 1:16:05 PM Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description A L Woolhouse Inc 101-0000-2073 500.00 9/11/2025 Erosion Escrow 4020 Glendale Dr #411754 500.00 9/11/2025 A L Woolhouse Inc 500.00 ALERT ALL CORPORATION 101-1220-4144 5,210.00 9/11/2025 Open House Promo Items 5,210.00 9/11/2025 ALERT ALL CORPORATION 5,210.00 Al-Hilwani Juli 101-1530-4347 300.00 9/11/2025 10 - Blackmun Al-Hilwani Juli 101-1539-4343 131.00 9/11/2025 PB 9/6 and 2 Fit For Life classes 431.00 9/11/2025 Al-Hilwani Juli 431.00 All Goals Inc 101-1550-4120 4,623.00 9/11/2025 Soccer goals for Bandimere Park (replacement) 4,623.00 9/11/2025 All Goals Inc 4,623.00 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 101-0000-2008 85.02 9/4/2025 August premium 85.02 9/4/2025 AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 1 of 25 81 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 85.02 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4112 228.16 9/4/2025 Public Works Coffee ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4112 497.61 9/4/2025 City Hall Coffee ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4113 392.00 9/4/2025 Bevi Flavors ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4112 140.06 9/4/2025 Fire Station Coffee 1,257.83 9/4/2025 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4113 153.50 9/11/2025 CO2 Tanks 153.50 9/11/2025 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 1,411.33 Banas Patrick 101-0000-2073 500.00 9/11/2025 Erosion escrow 6881 Chaparral Ln #668968 500.00 9/11/2025 Banas Patrick 500.00 BCA 101-1220-4352 32.00 9/10/2025 Background Investigation 32.00 9/10/2025 BCA 32.00 BENSON KAYE L 101-1539-4343 560.00 9/4/2025 4253.113 Fit for Life 20 classes 560.00 9/4/2025 BENSON KAYE L 560.00 Boarman Kroos Vogel Group Inc 416-0000-4300 76,401.37 9/4/2025 Chan Bluffs A/E Services Boarman Kroos Vogel Group Inc 414-4010-4303 12,399.00 9/4/2025 Civic Campus A/E 88,800.37 9/4/2025 AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 2 of 25 82 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Boarman Kroos Vogel Group Inc 88,800.37 BOLTON & MENK INC 700-6048-4300 1,079.98 9/11/2025 Water @ 13% BOLTON & MENK INC 701-6048-4300 1,079.98 9/11/2025 Sanitary @ 13% BOLTON & MENK INC 601-6048-4300 5,566.02 9/11/2025 PMP @ 67% BOLTON & MENK INC 720-6048-4300 581.52 9/11/2025 Storm @ 7% BOLTON & MENK INC 101-1310-4359 249.23 9/11/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 8,556.73 9/11/2025 BOLTON & MENK INC 8,556.73 BORNBACH PATRICK & KATIE 101-0000-2073 500.00 9/4/2025 Erosion escrow 7070 Redwing Ln #684241 500.00 9/4/2025 BORNBACH PATRICK & KATIE 500.00 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 101-1220-4142 200.95 9/11/2025 Medical supplies-OB kits 200.95 9/11/2025 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 200.95 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 414-4010-4303 3,537.00 9/4/2025 Civic Campus-CMT 3,537.00 9/4/2025 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 3,537.00 Carver County 700-1160-4326 750.00 9/11/2025 Dark Fiber - Utility Locations Carver County 700-1160-4326 700.00 9/11/2025 Dark Fiber & Internet Services 1,450.00 9/11/2025 Carver County 1,450.00 AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 3 of 25 83 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description CARVER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 701-0000-4150 103.32 9/11/2025 locating paint cans CARVER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 700-0000-4150 103.32 9/11/2025 locating paint cans 206.64 9/11/2025 CARVER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 206.64 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO 720-7207-4150 587.00 9/11/2025 concrete for stormwater repair 587.00 9/11/2025 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO 587.00 CENTURYLINK 700-7019-4310 216.44 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 701-0000-4310 6.17 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 701-0000-4310 15.56 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 101-1350-4310 30.85 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 101-1170-4310 75.97 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 101-1160-4325 250.88 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 101-1312-4310 49.36 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 101-1550-4310 30.85 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 700-0000-4310 6.17 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 700-0000-4310 15.57 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CENTURYLINK 101-1540-4310 62.06 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges 759.88 9/3/2025 CENTURYLINK 759.88 Cintas Corporation No. 2 101-1312-4510 127.62 9/4/2025 first aid kits 127.62 9/4/2025 Cintas Corporation No. 2 101-1312-4510 50.03 9/11/2025 safety supplies 50.03 9/11/2025 Cintas Corporation No. 2 177.65 AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 4 of 25 84 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Classic Home Enchancements 101-0000-2073 500.00 9/4/2025 Erosion escrow 7070 Redwing Ln #630412 500.00 9/4/2025 Classic Home Enchancements 500.00 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.101-1160-4211 216.00 9/4/2025 Microsoft M365 G3 Add on Licenses COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.101-1160-4211 525.20 9/4/2025 Datto O365 Backup Service - Sep 741.20 9/4/2025 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.101-1160-4200 135.00 9/11/2025 Annual Aruba IAP Support Renewal 135.00 9/11/2025 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 876.20 CORE & MAIN LP 700-0000-4550 77.84 9/4/2025 supplies for water mains 77.84 9/4/2025 CORE & MAIN LP 77.84 CROWN COLLEGE 101-1220-4370 650.00 9/11/2025 Quarterly EMS Training 650.00 9/11/2025 CROWN COLLEGE 650.00 CUT ABOVE INC 101-1550-4300 6,000.00 9/11/2025 Lake Ann tree removal 6,000.00 9/11/2025 CUT ABOVE INC 6,000.00 DENALI CUSTOM HOMES INC 101-0000-2073 11,250.00 9/11/2025 Erosion escrow 2961 Washta Bay Ct #512170 AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 5 of 25 85 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 11,250.00 9/11/2025 DENALI CUSTOM HOMES INC 11,250.00 DISPLAY SALES COMPANY 101-1550-4120 1,008.00 9/4/2025 Spinner flagpoles for 78th Street (Replacements) 1,008.00 9/4/2025 DISPLAY SALES COMPANY 1,008.00 Driveby Design LLC 101-0000-2073 500.00 9/11/2025 Erosion escrow 7626 Ridgeview Way #691925 500.00 9/11/2025 Driveby Design LLC 500.00 Earl F Andersen Inc 101-1320-4155 191.00 9/4/2025 breakaways for signs 191.00 9/4/2025 Earl F Andersen Inc 191.00 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 101-1120-4336 40.30 9/11/2025 Publication of Ord 749 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 101-1420-4336 40.30 9/11/2025 Public Hearing Notice 2025-13 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 101-1420-4336 44.33 9/11/2025 PH Notice for Eden Springs 2025-10 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 101-1310-4336 185.38 9/11/2025 Vacation PH -Avienda Rowhomes 310.31 9/11/2025 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 310.31 Empire Solar Group 101-0000-2073 250.00 9/11/2025 Erosion escrow 6714 Mulberry Cir #452960 250.00 9/11/2025 AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 6 of 25 86 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Empire Solar Group 250.00 Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-4811 116.38 9/11/2025 303 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR7 Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-4811 106.98 9/11/2025 308 - 24 Chev Silv #27RZHT Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-2317 411.39 9/11/2025 306 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGRB Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 149.36 9/11/2025 602 - 24 Chev Equi #27MF9K Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-2317 411.45 9/11/2025 315 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGTV Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 773.76 9/11/2025 416 - 23 Chev Silv #25XGMC Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-4811 118.37 9/11/2025 306 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGRB Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 78.28 9/11/2025 408 - 22 Chev Silv #25G89X Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 662.43 9/11/2025 204 - 23 Chev Tahoe #25WDVL Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 213.77 9/11/2025 202 - 23 Chev Tahoe #25WDVJ Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 153.17 9/11/2025 502 - 23 Chev Blazer #25XQVB Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-2317 411.45 9/11/2025 314 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGTW Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 173.08 9/11/2025 402 - 23 Chev Silv #25XGMF Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-2317 210.20 9/11/2025 307 - 23 Chev Equinox #262P8K Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-4811 48.01 9/11/2025 307 - 23 Chev Equinox #262P8K Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 762.61 9/11/2025 402 - 23 Chev Silv #25XGMF Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-2317 415.34 9/11/2025 310 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR3 Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-2317 210.20 9/11/2025 307 - 23 Chev Equinox #262P8K Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-4811 119.81 9/11/2025 315 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGTV Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 69.88 9/11/2025 411 - 22 Chev Silv #25G8CL Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 316.29 9/11/2025 404 - 24 GMC Sier #27NDJJ Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 540.59 9/11/2025 801 - 24 Chry Paci #2754MQ Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-4811 48.01 9/11/2025 307 - 23 Chev Equinox #262P8K Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-4811 119.81 9/11/2025 314 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGTW Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 775.60 9/11/2025 419 - 23 Chev Silv #25XGMJ Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 223.28 9/11/2025 203 - 23 Chev Silv #26RPC3 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 57.52 9/11/2025 214 - 22 Chev Silv #25G5D2 Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-4811 33.05 9/11/2025 305 - 22 Chev Silv #25G5QR Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-4811 33.05 9/11/2025 305 - 22 Chev Silv #25G5QR Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 316.36 9/11/2025 410 - 24 GMC Sier #27NDJB Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-2317 410.78 9/11/2025 301 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR8 Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-4811 106.99 9/11/2025 308 - 24 Chev Silv #27RZHT Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 766.21 9/11/2025 130 - 24 GMC Sier #27NF7M Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 475.00 9/11/2025 602 - 24 Chev Equi #27MF9K Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-2317 410.79 9/11/2025 301 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR8 Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-4811 116.38 9/11/2025 303 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR7 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 468.89 9/11/2025 606 - 22 Ford Rang #25G23Z Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-2317 332.23 9/11/2025 305 - 22 Chev Silv #25G5QR Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 566.46 9/11/2025 502 - 23 Chev Blazer #25XQVB Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 283.74 9/11/2025 131 - 24 Chev Silv #27NDJK AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 7 of 25 87 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 625.24 9/11/2025 501 - 23 Chev Silv #26RL44 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 647.91 9/11/2025 214 - 22 Chev Silv #25G5D2 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 777.44 9/11/2025 134 - 23 Chev Silv #25WNKR Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 104.91 9/11/2025 405 - 22 Chev Silv #25G5QQ Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 230.55 9/11/2025 603 - 25 Chev Equi #28CM4H Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 235.52 9/11/2025 501 - 23 Chev Silv #26RL44 Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-2317 411.46 9/11/2025 315 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGTV Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 249.21 9/11/2025 430 - 24 Chry Paci #275N63 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 212.22 9/11/2025 401 - 23 Chev Silv #26RPBZ Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 765.34 9/11/2025 410 - 24 GMC Sier #27NDJB Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-2317 415.35 9/11/2025 310 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR3 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 662.43 9/11/2025 202 - 23 Chev Tahoe #25WDVJ Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 462.25 9/11/2025 001 - 22 Ford Esca #26M3MH Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-2317 411.46 9/11/2025 314 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGTW Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 47.73 9/11/2025 412 - 22 GMC Sier #25H28F Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 159.53 9/11/2025 420 - 23 Chev Silv #25XGMS Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 757.80 9/11/2025 505 - 23 Chev Silv #26RP8Z Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-2317 383.02 9/11/2025 308 - 24 Chev Silv #27RZHT Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 781.48 9/11/2025 201 - 22 GMC Yuko #25MPSN Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 598.30 9/11/2025 430 - 24 Chry Paci #275N63 Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-4811 113.30 9/11/2025 310 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR3 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 159.96 9/11/2025 403 - 23 Chev Silv #25XGMK Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 660.15 9/11/2025 408 - 22 Chev Silv #25G89X Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 69.00 9/11/2025 201 - 22 GMC Yuko #25MPSN Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-2317 412.90 9/11/2025 303 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR7 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 719.62 9/11/2025 203 - 23 Chev Silv #26RPC3 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 89.08 9/11/2025 001 - 22 Ford Esca #26M3MH Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 773.41 9/11/2025 420 - 23 Chev Silv #25XGMS Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-4811 119.82 9/11/2025 314 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGTW Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 507.41 9/11/2025 605 - 22 Ford Rang #25G25M Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 159.98 9/11/2025 419 - 23 Chev Silv #25XGMJ Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-4811 119.82 9/11/2025 315 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGTV Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-4811 118.98 9/11/2025 301 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR8 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 156.78 9/11/2025 134 - 23 Chev Silv #25WNKR Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 213.77 9/11/2025 204 - 23 Chev Tahoe #25WDVL Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 77.27 9/11/2025 606 - 22 Ford Rang #25G23Z Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 74.37 9/11/2025 605 - 22 Ford Rang #25G25M Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 622.80 9/11/2025 603 - 25 Chev Equi #28CM4H Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 765.36 9/11/2025 404 - 24 GMC Sier #27NDJJ Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 252.81 9/11/2025 801 - 24 Chry Paci #2754MQ Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-2317 412.89 9/11/2025 303 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR7 Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-2317 383.01 9/11/2025 308 - 24 Chev Silv #27RZHT Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 159.60 9/11/2025 416 - 23 Chev Silv #25XGMC AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 8 of 25 88 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 553.52 9/11/2025 412 - 22 GMC Sier #25H28F Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 634.37 9/11/2025 405 - 22 Chev Silv #25G5QQ Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 764.19 9/11/2025 401 - 23 Chev Silv #26RPBZ Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 665.36 9/11/2025 411 - 22 Chev Silv #25G8CL Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-2317 411.39 9/11/2025 306 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGRB Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 47.76 9/11/2025 140 - 22 Chev Silv #25G5J6 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 213.68 9/11/2025 505 - 23 Chev Silv #26RP8Z Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 777.45 9/11/2025 132 - 23 Chev Silv #25WNCN Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-4811 113.30 9/11/2025 310 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR3 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 156.79 9/11/2025 132 - 23 Chev Silv #25WNCN Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 311.54 9/11/2025 130 - 24 GMC Sier #27NF7M Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-2317 332.23 9/11/2025 305 - 22 Chev Silv #25G5QR Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-4811 118.38 9/11/2025 306 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGRB Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 719.20 9/11/2025 131 - 24 Chev Silv #27NDJK Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-4811 118.98 9/11/2025 301 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR8 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 775.51 9/11/2025 403 - 23 Chev Silv #25XGMK Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 661.46 9/11/2025 140 - 22 Chev Silv #25G5J6 35,473.30 9/11/2025 Enterprise FM Trust 35,473.30 EROSION PRODUCTS LLC 700-0000-4150 120.00 9/4/2025 erosion control bio log EROSION PRODUCTS LLC 720-7207-4150 120.00 9/4/2025 erosion control bio log 240.00 9/4/2025 EROSION PRODUCTS LLC 240.00 Everlight Solar Construction 101-0000-2073 250.00 9/4/2025 Erosion escrow 6741 Country Oaks Rd #460863 Everlight Solar Construction 101-0000-2073 250.00 9/4/2025 Erosion escrow 1738 Valley Ridge Trl N #461725 500.00 9/4/2025 Everlight Solar Construction 500.00 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 700-0000-4120 337.12 9/4/2025 batteries FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 101-1220-4140 -282.56 9/4/2025 batteries FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 101-1320-4140 282.56 9/4/2025 batteries AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 9 of 25 89 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 337.12 9/4/2025 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 101-1550-4120 70.17 9/11/2025 battery FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 101-1550-4120 82.15 9/11/2025 battery 152.32 9/11/2025 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 489.44 FASTENAL COMPANY 701-0000-4150 34.52 9/4/2025 Lift station 29 supplies 34.52 9/4/2025 FASTENAL COMPANY 34.52 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4250 4,534.14 9/4/2025 Civic Campus Splash Pad Water Meter 4,534.14 9/4/2025 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 4,534.14 Glowing Hearth & Home 101-1250-3305 82.00 9/11/2025 Permit Refund - 6250 Ridge Rd 82.00 9/11/2025 Glowing Hearth & Home 82.00 GONYEA HOMES 101-0000-2075 750.00 9/11/2025 Landscape Escrow-9479 Eagle Ridge Way 750.00 9/11/2025 GONYEA HOMES 750.00 GoTo Communications Inc 700-0000-4310 74.49 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication GoTo Communications Inc 101-1170-4310 2,411.42 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication GoTo Communications Inc 101-1312-4310 150.52 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication GoTo Communications Inc 701-0000-4310 74.49 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 10 of 25 90 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description GoTo Communications Inc 101-1550-4310 51.20 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication 2,762.12 9/3/2025 GoTo Communications Inc 2,762.12 GRAYBAR 101-1350-4120 2,900.00 9/4/2025 new LED street lights 2,900.00 9/4/2025 GRAYBAR 2,900.00 Grey Duck Outdoor 101-1540-3635 2,664.84 9/11/2025 Lake Ann Paddleboard Rental Revenue-2025 2,664.84 9/11/2025 Grey Duck Outdoor 2,664.84 Guard Guys, LLC 101-1120-4352 27.95 9/4/2025 Background Checks 27.95 9/4/2025 Guard Guys, LLC 27.95 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7043-4160 10.00 9/4/2025 1 ton chlorine cylinders 10.00 9/4/2025 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 10.00 Health Strategies 101-1220-4352 476.00 9/11/2025 New hire physical assessment Health Strategies 101-1220-4352 6,639.00 9/11/2025 Annual medical exams 7,115.00 9/11/2025 Health Strategies 7,115.00 AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 11 of 25 91 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Heiman, Inc.101-1550-4120 643.15 9/11/2025 water cannon parts #424 643.15 9/11/2025 Heiman, Inc. 643.15 Heinen Homes Inc 101-0000-2073 250.00 9/4/2025 Erosion escrow 3420 Shore Dr #461822 250.00 9/4/2025 Heinen Homes Inc 250.00 Holt Tour and Charter Inc 101-1560-4349 865.00 9/4/2025 Senior Trip to Ames Theater Brnsvl 865.00 9/4/2025 Holt Tour and Charter Inc 865.00 Houston Engineering Inc 400-0000-1155 793.00 9/4/2025 Audubon Business Park Houston Engineering Inc 400-0000-1155 91.50 9/4/2025 Xcel Service Center 884.50 9/4/2025 Houston Engineering Inc 884.50 Ideal Service Inc.701-0000-4551 2,278.00 9/4/2025 preventative maintenance VFD Ideal Service Inc.700-0000-4550 2,277.50 9/4/2025 preventative maintenance VFD 4,555.50 9/4/2025 Ideal Service Inc. 4,555.50 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1120-4110 120.99 9/11/2025 Tissues and Copy Paper 120.99 9/11/2025 AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 12 of 25 92 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Innovative Office Solutions LLC 120.99 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 101-1250-4210 772.26 9/11/2025 Code books 772.26 9/11/2025 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 772.26 Iron River Construction 101-0000-2073 500.00 9/11/2025 Erosion escrow 7711 Ridgeview Way #675019 500.00 9/11/2025 Iron River Construction 500.00 IRRIGATION BY DESIGN INC 101-1550-4151 2,197.00 9/4/2025 IBD Irrigation repairs 2,197.00 9/4/2025 IRRIGATION BY DESIGN INC 2,197.00 IUOE Local #49 700-0000-2004 135.42 9/3/2025 September dues IUOE Local #49 101-0000-2004 455.00 9/3/2025 September dues IUOE Local #49 701-0000-2004 74.58 9/3/2025 306 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGRB 665.00 9/3/2025 IUOE Local #49 665.00 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 101-1140-4302 57.50 9/4/2025 Labor/Employment Matters 57.50 9/4/2025 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 57.50 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 400-0000-1155 13,520.00 9/4/2025 Avienda Row Homes KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 101-1310-4300 3,496.40 9/4/2025 Intrepid/T-Mobile Support Services KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 101-0000-2076 2,260.45 9/4/2025 GigaPower Support Services AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 13 of 25 93 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 400-0000-1155 1,305.00 9/4/2025 Pleasantview Pointe KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 101-1310-4300 34,528.50 9/4/2025 Comcast Support Services KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 101-1310-4300 25,187.50 9/4/2025 Metronet Support Services 80,297.85 9/4/2025 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 80,297.85 Life Support Innovations LLC 201-0000-4705 11,155.05 9/11/2025 New AED Purchase 11,155.05 9/11/2025 Life Support Innovations LLC 11,155.05 M3 Planning Inc 101-1120-4238 25,000.00 9/11/2025 Annual Licensing 25,000.00 9/11/2025 M3 Planning Inc 25,000.00 Macqueen Emergency Group 101-1220-4530 12.00 9/11/2025 SCBA repair 12.00 9/11/2025 Macqueen Emergency Group 12.00 Malone Andrew & Karen 101-0000-2073 500.00 9/11/2025 Erosion escrow 7399 Moccasin Trl #685545 500.00 9/11/2025 Malone Andrew & Karen 500.00 Metronet Holdings, LLC 101-1190-4310 106.29 9/10/2025 Telephone & Communication Metronet Holdings, LLC 700-7043-4310 56.47 9/10/2025 Telephone & Communications 162.76 9/10/2025 AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 14 of 25 94 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Metronet Holdings, LLC 162.76 Metropolitan Area Management Association 101-1120-4360 35.00 9/11/2025 Matt U - Luncheon Cost 8/28 35.00 9/11/2025 Metropolitan Area Management Association 35.00 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 701-0000-2023 9,940.00 9/11/2025 August 2025 SAC Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 101-1250-3816 -99.40 9/11/2025 August 2025 SAC 9,840.60 9/11/2025 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 9,840.60 MIDWEST PLAYSCAPES 101-1550-4120 185.60 9/4/2025 Playground swing repair parts (restock) 185.60 9/4/2025 MIDWEST PLAYSCAPES 185.60 MINNESOTA DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 101-1600-4130 50.00 9/3/2025 Civic Campus concession stand applicant form fee 50.00 9/3/2025 MINNESOTA DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 50.00 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 101-0000-2022 4,603.77 9/11/2025 August 2025 Surcharge MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 101-1250-3818 -92.12 9/11/2025 August 2025 Surcharge 4,511.65 9/11/2025 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 4,511.65 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 101-1310-4359 108.00 9/11/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 601-6140-4300 2,700.06 9/11/2025 County @ 75% MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 601-6040-4300 900.02 9/11/2025 City @ 25% AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 15 of 25 95 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 101-1310-4359 62.67 9/11/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 601-6140-4300 3,133.33 9/11/2025 County @ 75% MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 601-6040-4300 1,044.44 9/11/2025 City @ 25% MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 601-6040-4300 226.52 9/11/2025 City @ 25% MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 101-1310-4359 13.59 9/11/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 601-6140-4300 679.58 9/11/2025 County @ 75% MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 601-6040-4300 450.90 9/11/2025 City @ 25% MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 601-6140-4300 1,352.72 9/11/2025 County @ 75% 10,671.83 9/11/2025 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 10,671.83 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 101-0000-2037 128.00 9/3/2025 September premium 128.00 9/3/2025 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 128.00 MN Solar and More 101-0000-2073 250.00 9/4/2025 Erosion escrow 7531 Beacon Ct #467810 250.00 9/4/2025 MN Solar and More 250.00 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 131.58 9/3/2025 Electric Charge MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 43.92 9/3/2025 Electric Charge 175.50 9/3/2025 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 223.29 9/10/2025 Electric Charge MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 42.88 9/10/2025 Electric Charge MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 105.51 9/10/2025 Electric Charge MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 55.91 9/10/2025 Electric Charge MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1600-4320 50.69 9/10/2025 Electric Charge MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 5,862.33 9/10/2025 Electric Charge MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 700-0000-4320 167.25 9/10/2025 Electric Charge MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 701-0000-4320 1,131.02 9/10/2025 Electric Charge AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 16 of 25 96 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 7,638.88 9/10/2025 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 7,814.38 Mom's Landscaping & Design 101-0000-2073 250.00 9/4/2025 Erosion escrow 8657 Stonefield Ln #415248 250.00 9/4/2025 Mom's Landscaping & Design 250.00 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 101-1550-4151 340.00 9/11/2025 Irrigation pump Bandimere (repair) 340.00 9/11/2025 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 340.00 Murphy Bros Building 101-0000-2073 250.00 9/11/2025 Erosion escrow 6655 Mulberry Cir #485611 250.00 9/11/2025 Murphy Bros Building 250.00 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1550-4120 34.97 9/4/2025 graffiti remover interior protectant NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1320-4120 141.72 9/4/2025 filters NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 700-0000-4140 22.78 9/4/2025 filters NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1320-4140 19.98 9/4/2025 hose clamps 219.45 9/4/2025 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1550-4120 71.18 9/11/2025 filters NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1320-4120 204.69 9/11/2025 Filters NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1550-4120 -71.18 9/11/2025 Warranty 204.69 9/11/2025 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 424.14 AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 17 of 25 97 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 601-6048-4751 136,156.33 9/4/2025 Crimson Bay Rd 136,156.33 9/4/2025 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 136,156.33 Olivine Yoga LLC Val Roder /101-1560-4343 200.00 9/4/2025 Chair Class 200.00 9/4/2025 Olivine Yoga LLC Val Roder / 200.00 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 700-0000-4140 119.72 9/4/2025 Spark Plug Igntion Coil 119.72 9/4/2025 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 119.72 Paragon Party Ponies LLC 101-1537-4345 600.00 9/4/2025 Barnyard Boogie Petting Zoo 600.00 9/4/2025 Paragon Party Ponies LLC 600.00 Park Construction Co 601-6060-4751 222,397.38 9/4/2025 2024 City Pavement Project 222,397.38 9/4/2025 Park Construction Co 222,397.38 Pioneer Athletics 101-1550-4150 2,692.00 9/4/2025 Athletic Field Striping paint (Restock) 2,692.00 9/4/2025 Pioneer Athletics 2,692.00 POWERPLAN OIB 101-1320-4120 288.87 9/11/2025 belt and tensioner AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 18 of 25 98 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 288.87 9/11/2025 POWERPLAN OIB 288.87 Pro-Tree Outdoor Services 101-1310-4359 10.00 9/11/2025 LC Per MN Statute 471.425 Pro-Tree Outdoor Services 601-6140-4751 412.50 9/11/2025 County @ 75% Pro-Tree Outdoor Services 601-6040-4751 137.50 9/11/2025 City @ 25% 560.00 9/11/2025 Pro-Tree Outdoor Services 560.00 RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 101-1425-4574 23,594.40 9/4/2025 City Wide EAB Treatments 23,594.40 9/4/2025 RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 23,594.40 Rent N Save Portable Services 101-1550-4400 5,445.45 9/4/2025 portable restrooms 5,445.45 9/4/2025 Rent N Save Portable Services 5,445.45 Ryan Contracting Company 701-6053-4751 267,777.16 9/4/2025 Sanitary @ 8% Ryan Contracting Company 720-6053-4751 44,643.35 9/4/2025 Storm @ 22% Ryan Contracting Company 700-6053-4751 625,402.10 9/4/2025 Water @ 10% Ryan Contracting Company 601-6053-4751 287,719.85 9/4/2025 PMP @ 60% 1,225,542.46 9/4/2025 Ryan Contracting Company 1,225,542.46 SCOTT NELSON COACHING INC 101-1120-4371 2,000.00 9/4/2025 Excellence in Communication Training 2,000.00 9/4/2025 AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 19 of 25 99 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description SCOTT NELSON COACHING INC 2,000.00 SEH 410-4410-4300 3,925.08 9/4/2025 Lake Ann Park Preserve 3,925.08 9/4/2025 SEH 3,925.08 Shred-N-Go Inc 101-1425-4300 1,550.00 9/4/2025 Fall Community Shred Event 1,550.00 9/4/2025 Shred-N-Go Inc 1,550.00 Silva Screenprinting & Dist, LLC 101-1600-4130 61.63 9/4/2025 City sweatshirts 61.63 9/4/2025 Silva Screenprinting & Dist, LLC 61.63 SiteOne Landscape Supply 700-0000-4150 86.03 9/4/2025 restoration from water main breaks 86.03 9/4/2025 SiteOne Landscape Supply 86.03 Sparkle Pool Service 101-0000-2073 1,000.00 9/11/2025 Erosion escrow 2308 Boulder Rd #666418 1,000.00 9/11/2025 Sparkle Pool Service 1,000.00 Steine Mark 101-0000-2073 250.00 9/11/2025 Erosion escrow 6865 Nez Perce Dr #384242 Steine Mark 101-0000-2073 500.00 9/11/2025 Erosion escrow 6865 Nez Perce Dr #386242 750.00 9/11/2025 AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 20 of 25 100 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Steine Mark 750.00 Stericycle, Inc 101-1120-4300 229.00 9/11/2025 Shredding bin swap 229.00 9/11/2025 Stericycle, Inc 229.00 Sun Life Financial 700-0000-2037 175.05 9/4/2025 Life Insurance-September Sun Life Financial 101-0000-2037 1,213.95 9/4/2025 Life Insurance-September Sun Life Financial 701-0000-2037 175.05 9/4/2025 Life Insurance-September Sun Life Financial 720-0000-2015 40.59 9/4/2025 305 - 22 Chev Silv #25G5QR Sun Life Financial 101-0000-2015 1,325.15 9/4/2025 LTD premium-September Sun Life Financial 101-0000-2011 675.26 9/4/2025 Life Insurance-September Sun Life Financial 720-0000-2011 20.49 9/4/2025 Life Insurance-September Sun Life Financial 701-0000-2011 30.00 9/4/2025 Life Insurance-September Sun Life Financial 700-0000-2011 48.20 9/4/2025 Life Insurance-September Sun Life Financial 700-0000-2015 98.62 9/4/2025 LTD premium-September Sun Life Financial 701-0000-2015 62.46 9/4/2025 LTD premium-September Sun Life Financial 101-0000-2011 8.15 9/4/2025 Life Insurance-September 3,872.97 9/4/2025 Sun Life Financial 3,872.97 Superior Construction Inc 101-0000-2073 250.00 9/4/2025 Erosion escrow 7541 Beacon Ct #384294 250.00 9/4/2025 Superior Construction Inc 250.00 Survey Supply Inc 701-0000-4150 1,535.76 9/11/2025 locating supplies Survey Supply Inc 700-0000-4150 1,535.76 9/11/2025 locating supplies 3,071.52 9/11/2025 Survey Supply Inc 3,071.52 AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 21 of 25 101 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Sustainable Investment Group LLC 414-4010-4300 7,056.00 9/11/2025 commissioning new City Hall 7,056.00 9/11/2025 Sustainable Investment Group LLC 7,056.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 101-1350-4565 510.00 9/4/2025 street light repair Taylor Electric Company, LLC 414-4010-4300 12,175.00 9/4/2025 Market Blvd Traffic Signal Loop Replacement 12,685.00 9/4/2025 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 12,685.00 Titan Energy Systems 701-7015-4705 4,154.00 9/11/2025 CIP Lift Station #5 4,154.00 9/11/2025 Titan Energy Systems 4,154.00 Tollefson Peter & Shandra 101-0000-2073 500.00 9/4/2025 Erosion escrow 6435 Pleasant View Ln #636238 500.00 9/4/2025 Tollefson Peter & Shandra 500.00 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 101-1550-4300 1,490.00 9/11/2025 Fence repair 1,490.00 9/11/2025 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 1,490.00 Trinity Construction Services LLC 101-0000-2073 250.00 9/4/2025 Erosion escrow 7504 West 77th St #453374 250.00 9/4/2025 Trinity Construction Services LLC 250.00 AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 22 of 25 102 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Vanbebber Jay 101-0000-2073 250.00 9/11/2025 Erosion escrow 6960 Shawnee Ln #445219 250.00 9/11/2025 Vanbebber Jay 250.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1370-4310 101.06 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1320-4310 297.24 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1120-4310 131.79 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1420-4310 173.54 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1170-4310 76.76 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1520-4310 52.17 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1220-4310 660.71 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication VERIZON WIRELESS 700-0000-4310 516.73 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1600-4310 236.64 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1550-4310 428.82 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication VERIZON WIRELESS 720-0000-4310 211.22 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1250-4310 292.00 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication VERIZON WIRELESS 700-0000-4310 95.10 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication VERIZON WIRELESS 701-0000-4310 95.10 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1530-4310 38.38 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication VERIZON WIRELESS 701-0000-4310 376.79 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1160-4310 115.14 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1540-4310 40.01 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1110-4310 40.01 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1310-4310 247.92 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1312-4310 115.14 9/3/2025 Telephone & Communication 4,342.27 9/3/2025 VERIZON WIRELESS 4,342.27 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 101-1550-4300 213.48 9/4/2025 Lake Ann Shop Clean 213.48 9/4/2025 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 213.48 White Christian & Teresa 101-0000-2073 250.00 9/4/2025 Erosion escrow 2231 Hunter Dr #446431 AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 23 of 25 103 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 250.00 9/4/2025 White Christian & Teresa 250.00 Wild Prairie Homes 101-0000-2073 250.00 9/11/2025 6991 Redwing Ln -Receipt #410526 250.00 9/11/2025 Wild Prairie Homes 250.00 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 700-0000-4150 958.15 9/4/2025 water main spoils WM MUELLER & SONS INC 101-1320-4157 84.63 9/4/2025 pothole patching 1,042.78 9/4/2025 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 101-1320-4157 369.71 9/11/2025 asphalt patch 369.71 9/11/2025 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 1,412.49 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 720-0000-4300 990.00 9/11/2025 WCA Support Services WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 700-0000-4300 1,924.00 9/11/2025 Biological Water Treatment Pilot Study WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 101-1311-4306 87.50 9/11/2025 GIS Support Services WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 720-0000-4300 2,748.50 9/11/2025 Water Resources Support Services WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 720-7025-4300 1,020.00 9/11/2025 2023 Pond Maintenance 6,770.00 9/11/2025 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 6,770.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1600-4320 30.18 9/3/2025 Electric Charge XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 111.73 9/3/2025 Electric Charge XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1600-4320 371.88 9/3/2025 Electric Charge XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1550-4320 -92.77 9/3/2025 Electric Charge XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1540-4320 2,192.14 9/3/2025 Electric Charge XCEL ENERGY INC 701-0000-4320 110.50 9/3/2025 Electric Charge XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1170-4320 3,516.61 9/3/2025 Electric Charge AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 24 of 25 104 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1220-4320 1,174.44 9/3/2025 Electric Charge XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1190-4320 717.41 9/3/2025 Electric Charge XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1312-4320 884.06 9/3/2025 Electric Charge XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 110.51 9/3/2025 Electric Charge XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1120-1193 196.62 9/3/2025 Electric Charge XCEL ENERGY INC 700-7019-4320 4,043.02 9/3/2025 Electric Charge 13,366.33 9/3/2025 XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 25,363.79 9/10/2025 Electric Charge 25,363.79 9/10/2025 XCEL ENERGY INC 38,730.12 2,073,461.19 AP - Check Detail (9/16/2025)Page 25 of 25 105 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Minnesota Valley Operation Round Up Grant Award File No.Item No: D.7 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Andrew Heger, Fire Chief Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council Accepts the Minnesota Valley Operation Round Up Grant Award." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Financial Sustainability SUMMARY BACKGROUND The fire department is excited to announce the launch of a new AED Library Program aimed at expanding public access to and use of Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs). To support this life- saving initiative, staff applied for funding through the Minnesota Valley Operation Round Up Grant Program. This program allows Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative customers to round up their monthly electric bills to the nearest dollar, with the collective contributions used to support community projects and initiatives. In late August, staff were notified that the department’s grant application was approved for funding, ensuring the successful launch of the AED Library Program. 106 DISCUSSION BUDGET The grant does not require a local match so there is not an initial financial commitment. Future budget impacts will include a $200 annual software operating license fee. RECOMMENDATION Accept a grant from the Minnesota Valley Operation Round Up program in the amount of $4,200. ATTACHMENTS MVEC ORU award Letter 107 108 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Firefighting Personal Protective Equipment Donation File No.Item No: D.8 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Andrew Heger, Fire Chief Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the donation of surplus firefighting personal protective equipment to the Hand in Hand Organization." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY BACKGROUND Minnesota Statue 471.3459 allows cities to donate surplus equipment to eligible nonprofit organizations which meet the IRS 501(c)(3) requirements. Staff have identified several personal protective items from the fire department which have reached the end of their life under NFPA standards. These standards render the items unusable to the fire department. Staff have identified a local nonprofit organization, Hand in Hand, which collects expired personal protective equipment, other firefighting equipment and humanitarian aid. The organization assists with equipping fire departments in other countries which may have little to nothing for firefighting equipment. When engaging in the donation process, the accepting organization is taking the items "as is" with no 109 Item Quantity Estimated Value Boots 17 $170 Gloves 23 $100 Hoods 29 $50 Turnout jackets 17 $170 Turnout Pants 14 $140 Helmets 20 $200 warranty, guarantee, or representation as to the condition, utility, or usability of the items. The city cannot be held liable for any damages in connection with or arising from the use of the items. The items listed below are all expired and will be donated on behalf of the city, pending city council approval. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Approve donation of the items listed on the staff report to the organization Hand in Hand Organization. ATTACHMENTS Donation Letter 110 111 112 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Approve Civic Campus Splashpad Purchase with Commercial Recreation Specialist, Inc File No.Item No: D.9 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Jerry Ruegemer, Park and Recreation Director Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the recommended quotes to Commercial Recreation Specialist in the amount of $207,563.00 for Splashpad equipment and installation for the new Civic Campus Splashpad." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY The Civic Campus Splashpad is part of the City of Chanhassen’s major Civic Campus redevelopment, designed to create a vibrant, family-friendly, and accessible community space in downtown Chanhassen. The splashpad is located on the Civic Campus, which is at the northeast intersection of West 78th Street and Kerber Boulevard, bordered by Market Boulevard to the east and City Center Park to the north. The site is adjacent to key civic facilities, including the new City Hall, Senior Center, Chanhassen Library, and Fire Station, making it a central and easily accessible destination for residents and visitors alike. This new amenity for the civic space is not only open and playful, but also sculptural and artistic in its design. The City of Chanhassen's first splashpad will be a great addition to the community that will keep families coming back time and time again. BACKGROUND 113 Splash pads are highly valued recreational amenities that offer safe, inclusive, and engaging water play for children and families. They are increasingly prioritized in community planning due to their broad appeal, safety, and ability to foster community engagement. In Chanhassen, a new splashpad is planned for the Civic Campus, with installation targeted for spring 2026, reflecting strong resident demand and alignment with regional trends. Key features of a Vortex splash pad include: Zero-depth water play (no standing water, improved safety) Variety of age-appropriate spray elements and interactive features 8 LED ground sprays can be choreographed and illuminated when splashpad not in use ADA-compliant design, ensuring accessibility for all users Design & Amenities: The design includes the following water features listed below. The splash pad can be tailored to accommodate a wide age range and can be integrated with future park improvements. • (2) Silhouette No-3 • (1) Silhouette No-4 • (2) Bamboo Rain • (1) Coreoplay Rainbow Set (8 LED ground sprays) • (1) Playsafe Drain The Civic Campus system is designed to be a pass-through flow system, meaning the water supply is constant and not recirculated/reused. The advantage of this type of system is that the city wouldn't be required to have staff be certified as pool operators, and the need to test water quality multiple times per day, seven days a week, when the splashpad is in operation. The water collected is designed to drain into the stormwater piping, and water collected will eventually flow into the Market Blvd pond south of the railroad tracks. That pond water will be collected and used as part of the water reuse system that will supply the Civic Campus irrigation and landscaping beds, City Center Park athletic field irrigation, fire station irrigation, and portions of the downtown center island irrigation, etc. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the recommended quotes to Commercial Recreation Specialist, Inc. in the amount of $207,563.00 for Splashpad equipment and installation for the new Civic Campus Splashpad." ATTACHMENTS View 1 View 2 114 View 3 Quote #27703-REV2 City of Chanhassen Civic Complex Splashpad Equipment & Installation Commercail Recreation Specialist Splashpad Equipment Installation Contract.docx 115 9/17/25, 1:52 PM View_1.png (3840×2160) https://legistarweb-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/attachment/attachment/3578085/View_1.png 1/1116 9/17/25, 1:53 PM View_2.png (3840×2160) https://legistarweb-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/attachment/attachment/3578089/View_2.png 1/1117 9/17/25, 1:53 PM View_3.png (2500×1597) https://legistarweb-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/attachment/attachment/3578090/View_3.png 1/1118 Quote Commercial Recreation Specialists 807 Liberty Dr., Ste 101 Verona, WI 53593-9160 Ph: (877) 896-8442 Fx: (608) 848-8782 43-2046045 Page:1 0027703 9/3/2025Quote Date: Quote Number: Bill To : City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Ship To : City of Chanhassen Civic Complex 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 BEST WAY Shipping Method Customer PO Number SEE BELOW Payment Terms Jeff Corniea Sales Rep NameCustomer ID 10/3/2025 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Valid Through Item Unit Cost AmountDescriptionQuantity VO VOR-7774 9,100.004,550.002.00 VO VOR-7776 5,250.005,250.001.00 VO VOR-7730 16,900.008,450.002.00 VO VOR-7061 39,600.0039,600.001.00 VO VOR-109877 4,690.004,690.001.00 VO VOR-0622 3,650.003,650.001.00 VO VOR-102317 240.00240.001.00 VO VOR-13160 5,000.005,000.001.00 VO VOR-1004 1,650.001,650.001.00 /DISCOUNT CA 1,721.60-1,721.60-1.00 VO VOR-8543.0000 30,062.6030,062.601.00 /FREIGHT 2,542.002,542.001.00 Silhouette N°3 Silhouette N°4 Bamboo Rain Coreoplay Rainbow, 8x Lumiflows, EM, PC Lumiflow Power Pack, UL, 120V, AC, 14VAC, 600W, ETH, Max 12 LED, DMX, 30W Activator N°4 Toe Guard Single 4" Assembly for Activator N°4 CoreoPlay Creation Design Fee Playsafe Drain N°4 MN STATE CONTRACT DISCOUNT ON EQUIPMENT, SWIFT #218097 ($86,080 x 2%) Custom WDS ECCC 2.0 Cabinet Manifold, Flow Through Configuration, 1x 2" Inlet Supply Line, 14x 1" Outlet Lines With Solenoid & Ball Valves, MaestroPRO Controller, 24 Out / 12 In, 120VAC, 60Hz, AT&T LTE Cell Module, Includes 1x 2" Pressure Regulator Freight & Packaging Fee NOTE: Does Not Include Early Embeds Continued 119 Quote Commercial Recreation Specialists 807 Liberty Dr., Ste 101 Verona, WI 53593-9160 Ph: (877) 896-8442 Fx: (608) 848-8782 43-2046045 Page:2 0027703 9/3/2025Quote Date: Quote Number: Bill To : City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Ship To : City of Chanhassen Civic Complex 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 BEST WAY Shipping Method Customer PO Number SEE BELOW Payment Terms Jeff Corniea Sales Rep NameCustomer ID 10/3/2025 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Valid Through Item Unit Cost AmountDescriptionQuantity CRS SRV LABOR-SPLASHPAD 90,600.0090,600.001.00Splashpad Installation See Attached Scope of Work CRS SRV LABOR-SPLASHPAD 0.000.001.00Startup & Training INCLUDED CRS SRV LABOR-SPLASHPAD 0.000.001.00Winterization & Training INCLUDED IMPORTANT NOTES: * Above pricing does not include receiving, off-loading, or storage, prior to installation. * Current manufacturing lead time is ~ 10 weeks after receipt of order and all necessary items required for production purposes. * Sales Tax will be added if a Tax-Exempt form, Resale Certificate, or Capitol Improvement form are not provided at the time of purchase. * Freight is based on current quoted rates and is subject to change. Actual freight fees will be reflected on the final invoice. * Equipment pricing is valid for 30 days. * To maintain current pricing, order will need to be delivered by December 20th, 2025. Continued 120 Quote Commercial Recreation Specialists 807 Liberty Dr., Ste 101 Verona, WI 53593-9160 Ph: (877) 896-8442 Fx: (608) 848-8782 43-2046045 Page:3 0027703 9/3/2025Quote Date: Quote Number: Bill To : City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Ship To : City of Chanhassen Civic Complex 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 BEST WAY Shipping Method Customer PO Number SEE BELOW Payment Terms Jeff Corniea Sales Rep NameCustomer ID 10/3/2025 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Valid Through Item Unit Cost AmountDescriptionQuantity TERMS: * EQUIPMENT TO BE INVOICED UPON SHIPMENT – NET 30 DAYS * INSTALLATION TO BE INVOICED UPON SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION – NET 30 DAYS TARIFF DISCLAIMER: We want to keep you informed about potential changes in international trade policies that may result in new tariffs or import duties on certain goods. While these changes are outside our control, they could affect pricing and final invoice amounts. We’re closely monitoring the situation and will notify you of any changes that may impact your order. We appreciate your understanding and continued partnership. Net Order:207,563.00 Freight:0.00 Sales Tax:0.00 207,563.00Order Total: Note: This quote is valid for 30 days. Please review the above information carefully. It defines your order as we understand it. If satisfactory, please sign and date below and fax to 608-848-8782, email back to your sales representative, or send a copy with your deposit to the address above. We will begin processing your order upon receipt of both your DEPOSIT AND APPROVAL SIGNATURE, per the terms indicated on your quote above. Additional surcharges may apply depending on final delivery address, actual delivery requirements and payment method. Please note that a 3% convenience fee may apply to credit card orders. Customer Acceptance: ______________________________________________ Date: _____________ Donna 121 CORPORATE 807 Liberty Dr, Suite 101, Verona, WI 53593 SALES 657A N Michigan Ave, Kennilworth, NJ 07033 PHONE 608.848.8781 | 877.896.8442 FAX 608.848.8782 City of Chanhassen, MN - Civic Complex Splashpad Installation Scope of Work 9/3/25 Scope: •Set and connect Lumiflow drain lines to stubbed main drain system. (Main drain by others.) •Provide concrete foundations for Vortex water features. •Set SafeSwap foundations, SafeSwaps, and embedded water features according to manufacturer’s written instructions. •Provide and install control cabinet and drain down pit. •Provide and install manifold command center and pressure regulator. •Provide and install conduit to Activators and pull Vortex wire to controller. •Provide and install conduit to Lumiflows and pull lighting control wires. •Provide and install pipe material between manifold and water features. •Pressure test fittings and piping. •Provide and Install 3/8” gravel/stone chips around piping. Others to provide fill to final grade 6” below concrete and compact with light compactor prior to concrete. •Install Splashpad in accordance with contract documents (shop drawings, P&E, etc.). •Flush system with water to eliminate any construction debris. •Conduct system test. •Adjust water features’ water flow to required flow rate. •Provide laminated diagram of the manifold chart for the mechanical room. •Provide a start-up and operation training. This is required to happen on the same day/same trip as the installation of the vertical features. •Provide a Winterization training on site after Labor Day of the installation year, but before November 1st of the installation year. Exclusions & Owner/GC Responsibilities: •Receiving, offloading, storage prior to installation, and site security. •Private/Public utility locate required (Unmarked utilities responsibility of Owner/GC). •Staking and elevations provided by general contractor. Example: edge of pad, drains, control points, and benchmarks. •Permits and permitting fees not stated above. •Provide and install water meter and backflow preventer. •Backflow preventer certification. •Deliver/provide all equipment to the site prior to CRS arrival. •Water line plumbed to Control Cabinet and ready to be turned on. •Area inside Splashpad excavated to 24” below final grade. •Any wall penetrations, sleeves, or knockouts. •Concrete forms set to elevations as per civil drawings prior to istallers arrival on-site. •Base material placed by others to fill to final grade 6” below concrete after Splashpad piping completed by CRS. o This should be compacted with a light compactor. o Any damage to pipes during compaction is the responsibility of others and subject to additional charges for Commercial Recreation Specialists to fix. •Concrete preparation and concrete, other than Safeswap footings and foundation of drain pit. •Electrical – site electrical work including power and bonding/grounding of construction rebar and all water features. •Site restoration to include backfill, final grading, removal of spoils, and any seeding or landscaping not stated above. •Removal of debris and packaging material or provide a dumpster for disposal of debris and packaging material. 122 Quote Commercial Recreation Specialists 807 Liberty Dr., Ste 101 Verona, WI 53593-9160 Ph: (877) 896-8442 Fx: (608) 848-8782 43-2046045 Page:4 0027703 9/3/2025Quote Date: Quote Number: Bill To : City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Ship To : City of Chanhassen Civic Complex 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 General Terms and CondiƟons 1.When InstallaƟon or site work is specified in the proposal or quote, site security is not included. The customer is responsible for ensuring security during the project when Commercial RecreaƟon Specialists, Inc. is not present installing the specified system and immediately upon compleƟon of the installaƟon. In the event of vandalism or unexpected damage, Commercial RecreaƟon Specialists, Inc. reserves the right to charge the customer for repairs and/or replacement goods. 2.This proposal or quote may be withdrawn if not accepted within thirty (30) days of its issuance. Commercial RecreaƟon Specialists, Inc. will consider reasonable revisions to this proposal included in the terms of a subcontract provided it accurately incorporates the terms and condiƟons of this proposal. A proposal or quote not accepted within thirty (30) days will be subject to price escalaƟon for InstallaƟon materials, equipment, and freight. Commercial RecreaƟon Specialists, Inc. reserves the right to adjust its quoted price if the terms of a related subcontract increase its costs or add to Commercial RecreaƟon Specialists, Inc.’s administraƟve Ɵme of compliance. 3.When InstallaƟon or site work is specified in the proposal or quote, all work shall be performed according to industry standards. Areas in which Commercial RecreaƟon Specialists, Inc. InstallaƟon Team will be working shall be free and clear of all debris and accessible to any/all equipment necessary to perform the proposed work. Commercial RecreaƟon Specialists, Inc. assumes the site is buildable and has suitable subsurface condiƟons to allow the proposed construcƟon. 4.Unless waived in wriƟng by Commercial RecreaƟon Specialists, Inc., any changes to the scope of work, or the terms and condiƟons of this proposal shall be performed only aŌer execuƟon of a wriƩen change order. 5.Commercial RecreaƟon Specialists, Inc. is not responsible for any delays due to strikes, accidents, weather, acts of God, and/or other delays beyond the control of Commercial RecreaƟon Specialists, Inc. Commercial RecreaƟon Specialists, Inc. is not responsible for any damages due to any of the above or similar causes outside of its control. 6.Commercial RecreaƟon Specialists, Inc. is not responsible for receiving, off-loading, storage, installaƟon, project management or coordinaƟon, piping, anchor bolts, concrete, surfacing, electrical, plumbing, bonding, bonding payment, geotechnical survey work, excavaƟon, removal of exisƟng materials, removal of debris and packaging material, site restoraƟon, permits or permit fees, stamped drawings or Health department approval unless otherwise specified in the above proposal or quote. 7.The Customer is responsible for inspecƟng all deliveries for damage, noƟng any damage on the bill of lading, and noƟfying Commercial RecreaƟon Specialists, Inc. within one (1) day of receiving. 8.If applicable, sales tax has been included and will only be removed upon presentaƟon of a Tax-Exempt form, Resale CerƟficate, or Capitol Improvement form. In the event any asserƟon of tax-exempt status is later denied by a taxing authority, the buyer will be responsible for the unpaid tax and any penalƟes and interest charges. 9.Freight shown is an esƟmate based on current quoted rates and is subject to change. Actual freight costs will be charged at the Ɵme of shipment and will be included on the final invoice. If applicable, the buyer is responsible for customs fees, duƟes, or taxes assessed by any port of entry. 10.When InstallaƟon or site work is specified in the proposal or quote, Commercial RecreaƟon Specialists, Inc. is not responsible for private or public uƟlity charges to locate services unless otherwise specified in the proposal or quote. Private and public uƟlity efforts to locate services need to be completed and marked before Commercial RecreaƟon Specialists, Inc. arrives on site. Commercial RecreaƟon Specialists, Inc. is not responsible for damage to or repair of unmarked uƟliƟes. 11.The Customer is responsible for ensuring the scope of work in the quote or proposal meets all local standards and codes and that all required approvals and permits have been obtained, unless otherwise noted in the quote or proposal. This responsibility also extends to any changes requested. 12.Commercial RecreaƟon Specialists, Inc. warrants all its labor and workmanship under the aƩached proposal’s scope of work for a period of one (1) year from the date of substanƟal compleƟon. 13.Any requested special or custom modificaƟons and/or alteraƟons made to products installed by Commercial RecreaƟon Specialists, Inc. may void and null warranƟes provided by the manufacturer. 14. Our standard payment terms provie a 50% deposit be made at the Ɵme an order is placed. The remaining amount is due when the order is shipped and/or installaƟon is complete. We reserve the opƟon of requiring one or more interim payments of a porƟon of any remaining amount which becomes due in the event of parƟal shipments and/or a staggered installaƟon Ɵmelines (unless separately established by contract or wriƩen agreement) 15. These are our general terms and condiƟons that always apply unless superseded in this document or in another governing contract. 123 216034v1 1 NON-BID CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF GOODS AND SERVICES AGREEMENT made this 22nd day of September, 2025, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Commercial Recreation Specialist, Inc, Wisconsin corporation ("Contractor"). IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the “Contract Documents,” all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Agreement. B. Request for Proposal, dated September 22nd, 2025. C. Contractor’s Quote dated September 22nd, 2025. In the event of a conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts. Contract Document “A” has the first priority and Contract Document “C” has the last priority. 2. CONTRACTOR OBLIGATIONS. The Contractor shall provide the goods, services and perform the work in accordance with the Contract Documents (“Work”). Contractor shall provide all personnel, supervision, services, materials, tools, equipment and supplies and do all things necessary and ancillary thereto specified in the Contract Documents. This contract may be terminated by the City at any time upon discovery by the City that the Contractor or any of its subcontractors has submitted a false statement under oath verifying compliance with any of the minimum criteria set forth in Minn. Stat. §16C.285, Subdivision 3, the Responsible Contractor statute. 3. CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS. A. Contractor has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents and other related data identified in the Contract Documents. B. Contractor is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local Laws and Regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. C. Contractor has given City written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that Contractor has discovered in the Contract Documents, and the written resolution thereof by City is acceptable to Contractor. D. The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work. 124 216034v1 2 4. COMPENSATION. Contractor shall be paid by the City for the goods and services described in Paragraph 2 in accordance with the Quote, but not to exceed $207,563.00 for Splashpad equipment and splashpad installation which is inclusive of reimbursable expenses. The fee shall not be adjusted even if the estimated number of hours to perform a task, or any other estimate, assumption or matter is wrong or exceeded. Payment shall be made periodically after a service has been completed and within thirty-five (35) days of receipt of an invoice. 5. COMPLETION DATE. The Contractor shall complete the Work on or before August 1st, 2026. 6. WARRANTY. The Contractor shall be held responsible for any and all defects in workmanship and materials and upon notification by the City shall immediately replace or repair the defective workmanship and materials without cost to the City. The Contractor warrants that only new unused materials will be used. The Contractor further warrants to the City that all materials and services furnished under the Contract will be in conformance with Contract Documents and that the goods are of merchantable quality and are fit for the use for which they are sold. These warranties are in addition to any manufacturer's standard warranty, and any warranty provided by law. 7. RIGHTS AND REMEDIES. A. The duties and obligations imposed by the Contract Documents, and the rights and remedies available thereunder shall be in addition to, and not a limitation of, any duties, obligations, rights and remedies otherwise imposed or available by law. B. No action, or failure to act, by the City or the Contractor shall constitute a waiver of any right or duty afforded any of them under the Contract, nor shall any such action or failure to act constitute an approval of, or acquiescence in, any breach there under, except as may be specifically agreed in writing. 8. CHANGES TO WORK. Without invalidating the Contract, the City may, at any time, or from time to time, order additions, deletions or revisions in the work provided under this Agreement; these will be authorized by an amendment to the Contract. Upon approval of an amendment, Contractor shall proceed with the work provided under the amendment. Changes in the Contract Price shall be based upon the prices identified in the Quote provided or negotiated between the parties based on similar work provided in the Proposal. 9. UNAUTHORIZED WORK. Additional work performed without authorization of an amendment of this Contract will not entitle Contractor to an increase in the Compensation or an extension of the Contract. 10. DOCUMENTS. The City shall be the owner of all documents, reports, studies, analysis and the like prepared by the Contractor in conjunction with this contract. 11. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services hereunder, Contractor shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provisions of goods and services to be provided. 125 216034v1 3 12. STANDARD OF CARE. Contractor shall exercise the same degrees of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a professional Contractor under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement. City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of Contractor’s services. 13. INDEMNIFICATION. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, and its employees, officials, and agents from and against all claims, actions, damages, losses and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, arising out of Contractor’s negligence or its performance or failure to perform its obligations under this Contract. Contractor’s indemnification obligation shall apply to subcontractor(s), or anyone directly or indirectly employed or hired by Contractor, or anyone for whose acts Contractor may be liable. Contractor agrees this indemnity obligation shall survive the completion or termination of this Contract. 14. INSURANCE. Prior to the start of the project, Contractor shall furnish to the City a certificate of insurance showing proof of the required insurance required under this Paragraph. Contractor shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, such insurance as shall protect Contractor and the City for work covered by the Contract including workers’ compensation claims and property damage, bodily and personal injury which may arise from operations under this Contract, whether such operations are by Contractor or anyone directly or indirectly employed by either of them. The minimum amounts of insurance shall be as follows: Commercial General Liability (or in combination with an umbrella policy) $2,000,000 Each Occurrence $2,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Aggregate $2,000,000 Annual Aggregate The following coverages shall be included: Premises and Operations Bodily Injury and Property Damage Personal and Advertising Injury Blanket Contractual Liability Products and Completed Operations Liability Automobile Liability $2,000,000 Combined Single Limit – Bodily Injury & Property Damage Including Owned, Hired & Non-Owned Automobiles Workers Compensation Workers’ Compensation insurance in accordance with the statutory requirements of the State of Minnesota, including Employer’s Liability with minimum limits are as follows: $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Disease per employee $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Disease aggregate $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Accident The Contractor’s insurance must be “Primary and Non-Contributory”. 126 216034v1 4 All insurance policies (or riders) required by this Contract shall be (i) taken out by and maintained with responsible insurance companies organized under the laws of one of the states of the United States and qualified to do business in the State of Minnesota, (ii) shall name the City, its employees and agents as additional insureds (CGL and umbrella only) by endorsement which shall be filed with the City. A copy of the endorsement must be submitted with the certificate of insurance. Contractor’s policies and Certificate of Insurance shall contain a provision that coverage afforded under the policies shall not be cancelled without at least thirty (30) days’ advanced written notice to the City, or ten (10) days’ notice for non-payment of premium. An Umbrella or Excess Liability insurance policy may be used to supplement Contractor’s policy limits on a follow-form basis to satisfy the full policy limits required by this Contract. 15. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains the Contractor as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. The Contractor is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Contractor shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Contractor shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Contractor's performance under this Agreement. City and Contractor agree that Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Contractor or any of Contractor's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Contractor shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Contractor's own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 16. SUBCONTRACTORS. Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. Contractor shall comply with Minnesota Statute § 471.425. Contractor must pay Subcontractor for all undisputed services provided by Subcontractor within ten days of Contractor’s receipt of payment from City. Contractor must pay interest of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month to Subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to Subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. 17. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, nor any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 18. WAIVER. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 127 216034v1 5 20. CONTROLLING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 21. COPYRIGHT. Contractor shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or patent by reason of the use or adoption of any designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting there from. 22. RECORDS/AUDIT. The Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records of time and expense involved in the performance of services. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 16C.05, Subd. 5, any books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of City and Contractor relevant to the Agreement are subject to examination by City and Contactor, and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor as appropriate. City and Contractor agree to maintain these records for a period of six years from the date of performance of all services covered under this Agreement. 23. MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Contractor must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Contractor pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event Contractor receives a request to release data, Contractor must immediately notify City. City will give Contractor instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Contractor’s officers’, agents’, city’s, partners’, employees’, volunteers’, assignees’ or subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 24. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by City on two (2) days’ written notice delivered to Contractor at the address on file with the City. Upon termination under this provision if there is no fault of the Contractor, the Contractor shall be paid for goods and services rendered and reimbursable expenses until the effective date of termination. If the City terminates the Agreement because the Contractor has failed to perform in accordance with this Agreement, no further payment shall be made to the Contractor, and the City may retain another Contractor to undertake or complete the work identified in this Agreement. 128 216034v1 6 CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: Elise Ryan, Mayor And: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Dated: September 22nd, 2025 By: Jeff Corniea Its: Commercial Recreation Specialists, Inc 129 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Approve entering into agreements with Construction Manager for Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center File No.Item No: D.10 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION Approve entering into the A133 and A201 (AIA Standard documents) with RJM Construction. Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY BACKGROUND The city is using the construction manager at risk model for this project. The CMar process places the construction manager in essentially the same position as a general contractor because the construction manager is responsible for all subcontractors and for the “price, schedule, and workmanship” of the project. The 2023 Minnesota Legislature authorized municipalities to use the Construction Manager at Risk (CMar) process for non-right-of-way construction projects over $175,000, effective Aug. 1, 2023, and to be codified as Minnesota Statutes, section 471.463. In contrast to the CMa process, the CMar guarantees construction of the project for a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) in accordance with the agreed-upon completion schedule, subject to owner- directed changes or changed conditions. The GMP consists of the cost of the construction contracts, a contingency, the CMar’s negotiated fee, and its general conditions costs. 130 The CMar process allows a city to turn over a project to a competitively selected construction manager who is responsible for the work performed by the contractors, which are the CMar’s subcontractors, rather than through contracts directly with the city. The CMar GMP method usually results in less city staff involvement in the construction process and fewer change orders than in the CMa process. The CMar process is nearly identical to the state agency CMar requirements in Minnesota Statutes, section 16C.34. Cities using CMar must follow competitive selection procedures in hiring the CMar and must supervise the CMar’s required subcontractor competitive bidding process. The CMar process is commonly used for large private projects, and state agencies have been able to use it since 2005. In accordance with the solicitation and selection process laid out in MN State Statute 471.463 a request for qualifications (part 1) and request for proposals (part 2) were posted. The city received four RFQ submissions. Three firms were interviewed and their RFP proposals (part 2) evaluated. All three interviewed firms met the minimum requirements and had experience with Community Centers. Firms had a clear understanding and experience with the Construction Manager at Risk approach. This includes assisting throughout the design and bidding process, helping the team with value engineering, budget, estimates, and scheduling. DISCUSSION The documetns are substanitally complete, but final versions of the agreements will be approved by the city attorney prior to execution. BUDGET Conceptual Planning $0 Pre-Construction Services During Schematic Design and Design Development $20,000 Construction Phase Services during Construction Documents and Construction, CMAR Fee, as a Percentage of Cost of Work 1.50% See Page 2 of the attached RFP for full fee worksheet. Although price was not the only factor considered, RJM Construction did provide the lowest overall fee. RECOMMENDATION Based on a review of qualifications and proposals that included an interview, city staff recommend the selection of RJM Construction for construction manager services at the Chanhassen Community Center. ATTACHMENTS CMAR RFQ Chanhassen 3.11.25 RJM-FinalSubmission ChanhassenBluffs CC RFQ RFP 4.11.25 RJM Construction 4-18-25 A201 A133 131 CHANHASSEN BLUFFS COMMUNITY CENTER CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK (CMAR) SERVICES, REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS The City of Chanhassen is seeking qualifications from experienced and qualified firms to provide Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) services for the proposed Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 132 CITY OF CHANHASSEN REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK (CMAR) SERVICES CHANHASSEN BLUFFS COMMUNITY CENTER The City of Chanhassen (the "City") is seeking qualifications from experienced and qualified firms to provide Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) services for the proposed Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center. The CMAR will work with City staff, the selected architectural and engineering (AE) team BKV Group, and key stakeholders to ensure the successful delivery of this significant community project. Generally, the CMAR will be responsible for integrating the design and construction, utilizing the firm’s skills and knowledge of general contracting to contribute to the project's development during the design pre-construction phases. During the construction phase, the CMAR will be responsible for effecting construction of the project within an established Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP), and providing all necessary construction services through trade contractors selected as provided by Minnesota Statutes § 471.463. A. PROJECT BACKGROUND The proposed Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center will be an approximate 300,000- square-foot multi-use facility located at the southeast corner of the Avienda Development in Chanhassen, Minnesota. This community hub will include amenities such as an indoor walking track, field house, two sheets of ice, fitness and community rooms, and an indoor playground. The facility will also accommodate a future aquatic center expansion. The estimated overall project budget is $80 million, and the City aims to complete the project in time to host high school graduation ceremonies in June 2028. B. SCOPE OF SERVICES The City intends to enter into an open book Cost of Work plus fee with a Guaranteed Maximum Price contractual agreement with the selected CMAR. The contract will be negotiated for the construction work required, but the City will retain the option to select a different CMAR after completion of the preconstruction services or if the City of the selected CMAR cannot agree on a GMP. City intends to use the attached modified AIA Document A133-2019 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager at Risk. Any proposed changes to this document must be included with the CMAR’s qualifications submittal to be considered in the final contract. An amended AIA Document A201-2017 General Conditions of the Contract for Construction with added supplementary conditions will also be utilized. 133 The selected CMAR firm will be responsible for PRECONSTRUCTION and CONSTRUCTION services, including but not limited to: PROJECT COST ESTIMATING AND SCHEDULE SUPPORT Provide comparison estimates versus budget for architectural design options, providing direction for the project. Provide detailed cost estimates at the end of each design phase. Provide ongoing cost and schedule analysis during the design phases. Assist with development of preliminary construction schedule and phasing. Scheduling shall be based on applicable equipment lead times and other market factors. PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT Public participation and City collaboration are extremely important parts of this process. CMAR should participate in outreach activities that will focus on various stakeholders, including youth sports associations, School Districts 112 and 276, the Chanhassen City Council, and the general Chanhassen public. Participate in City Council presentations. Attend, present, answer inquiries, and supply information for public meetings, stakeholder interviews, engagement techniques, etc. led by BKV Group and city staff. Provide input and documentation for project website, and other City communications. DESIGN PHASES The CMAR shall actively participate in all design meetings, constructability reviews, periodically provide cost estimates during the design process, and ultimately develop a GMP. More specifically, the CMAR shall provide the following. CMAR to provide recommendations to the AE and City regarding materials, building components and systems, and evaluate building systems, components and materials for long term performance, life cycle cost analysis, and economy. CMAR to provide cost control resources for the AE during the remaining phases of design, which includes reviewing and monitoring the development, and preparation of documents to maintain the project cost within the project budget. CMAR to notify the AE and City of potential cost issues during the development of the drawings and specifications that may have an impact on the cost of the work. Work collaboratively with City and AE to develop alternatives to keep the project estimates within the fixed budget. CMAR to provide formal review and comment, and cost estimates at 100% complete SD documents, and 50% and 100% complete DD documents. Following these 134 reviews and value analysis/engineering efforts, the CMAR shall prepare a GMP based on the AE’s GMP Package at the conclusion of 100% DD. GMP to include pricing of both add and deduct alternates as defined by the AE which will be equal to approximately 5% of the GMP. In addition, CMAR to provide value analysis/engineering ideas in conjunction with preparation of these estimates to conform to the project budget. CMAR to be a resource to the AE as they prepare Construction documents that conform to the agreed upon scope of the work that is included in the GMP. Participation in City Staff and Stakeholder reviews that are separate and in addition to required AHJ reviews by Planning, Engineering, and Building Inspections. CMAR along with AE to coordinate with city planning and zoning for plan reviews at 50% and 100% complete DD documents. CMAR should anticipate multiple bid (likely two) packages from AE. CMAR to develop a strategy for issuing bid packages that facilitate the completion of those packages. Early bid packages may be required for certain building components that are subject to long lead times and/or sub-trades that have a high potential for cost escalation. CONSTRUCTION PLANNING AND SCHEDULING CMAR to work with the City and AE to develop a work plan for design activities in support of the schedule and budget for the project. During the SD phase, the CMAR will further develop the project master schedule including integration of the AE design efforts, preconstruction activities, procurement, construction activities, and work performed by other parties. Ongoing, the CMAR will evaluate all system, components, and materials for constructability, economy, long-term performance for use intended and schedule impacts, and provide recommendations for preferred options consistent with cost and schedule goals. In addition, the CMAR will identify long lead times requiring early bid package s and recommend issue dates for same to meet required completion date. Prior to the conclusion of the CD phase, CMAR will submit information for AE and City to review cost, constructability, sustainability, schedule, and value engineering. City to review, comment and approve. PROJECT MANAGEMENT CMAR to provide competent, experienced full-time staff, including an experienced construction field superintendent and project management team to coordinate the work, maintain the progress of the subcontractors, coordinate with ongoing activities and operations, and provide overall direction to the project during the construction phase. Establish on-site organization and levels of authority to conduct the overall plans of the construction team. 135 Demonstrate elevated levels of effective, proactive project leadership. Work cooperatively and constructively with members of the Project Team to foster positive relationships that support positive outcomes for the team members and the project. CMAR will be contractually obligated not to reassign key staff members to other projects without the City’s prior written consent. The City will have approval rights to any and all new personnel assigned to this project. CMAR will coordinate and lead all pre-construction conferences with bidders and/or subcontractors. CMAR will work with City and AE team in coordinating all RFIs, submittals, inspections, and material testing. CMAR shall coordinate schedules with all of the City’s vendors and consultants for the project. COST MANAGEMENT Implement effective cost management control and tracking procedures to provide the City with the opportunity to make such decisions as required to keep project costs within the fixed budget. Implement and maintain cost control methods with “open book” sharing of cost information. CMAR to inform City of pending cost issues as soon as practical after identifying potential issues. Implement and maintain a current log of pending cost issues impac ting the project budget and review no less than monthly with the City. Provide drawdown and cash flow projections for the project at the end of each design phase and during construction. Work with the City and AE to develop and implement a change management process for the project. SUBCONTRACTOR SELECTION STRATEGY/BIDDERS LIST Bid packages will be developed and include invitation to bid, instructions to bidders, and other forms and supplements needed to convey requirements. City and AE will be involved with bidding process, as appropriate and necessary. The CMAR shall conduct a telephone and correspondence campaign to attempt to increase interest among qualified bidders. COORDINATION MEETINGS DURING CONSTRUCTION CMAR to administer weekly meetings that include appropriate subcontractors, City representatives, and AE representatives to review open issues, schedule work, and resolve pending and upcoming issues. CMAR to prepare a written agenda in advance of each meeting. CMAR to maintain a list of action items with the identification of the 136 responsible party and due dates for each item. CMAR to distribute written meeting minutes and action item list within 48 hours of each meeting. SCHEDULE MANAGEMENT CMAR to prepare and manage a critical path-based project schedule indicating key milestone events, dates, and responsibilities. The schedule shall be submitted to the Project Team for City and AE acceptance as the baseline schedule. Baseline schedule to include design efforts, preconstruction activities, procurement of goods and construction activities. The baseline schedule shall account for City holidays and shall include a representative number of non-work days due to weather. CMAR to provide regular monitoring of the actual progress versus the scheduled progress, identify any variances and prepare a written action plan with an updated schedule and cost impacts to maintain the established completion dates. CMAR to determine the adequacy of the subcontractors’ personnel and equipment and the availability of materials and supplies to meet the schedule. Report status no less than weekly in regular weekly coordination meetings. CMAR to prepare a short-term (3 to 4 week) look-ahead schedule on a weekly basis. Coordinate City-purchased and/or third-party-provided furniture, fixtures, and equipment with the construction of the project. QUALITY MANAGEMENT CMAR to complete a quality/coordination/constructability review of each bid package , and work with City and AE to incorporate applicable comments into the documents, prior to issuing bid documents to subcontractors. Complete construction of the work in strict accordance with the quality requirements established by the contract documents. All testing and independent inspection services required will be secured and paid for by the City. CMAR to cooperate and coordinate with testing and inspection service agencies. CMAR will be responsible for the cost of additional testing due to failed tests. Develop an initial CMAR punch list and issue to subcontractors prior to formal punch list issued by AE. CMAR to ensure completion of CMAR’s initial punch list prior to AE’s punch list walk through. Work cooperatively with the Project team to develop and implement an effective commissioning plan. SAFETY Implement a formal project safety plan. 137 CMAR to designate an on-site safety point of contact who is available 24 hours a day in case of emergency. CMAR to inform City as soon as practical of any non-typical regulatory inspections and/or safety incidents that occur. PROJECT CLOSEOUT Timely submission of electronic operation and maintenance manuals, completed punch lists, coordination of training, as-built field documents, and financial close-out of project. CMAR to actively support and participate in the commissioning. Upon completion of construction the AE and CMAR team will prepare and deliver one set of as-constructed record drawings and specifications in an electronic format acceptable to the City, incorporating revisions made by the AE during the construction phase and field changes noted on the CMAR’s marked-up field set. OTHER Assist City in collaborating with various governing authorities as applicable. Work with the Project Team to develop a communication system that is effective for the participants and meets the schedule requirements of the project. The CMAR will be engaged through a Cost of Work plus Fee with a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) contract. C. SUBMISSION TIMELINE RFQ Solicitation March 13, 2025 RFQ Questions Due March 21, 2025, 3:00 PM RFQ Responses to Questions March 25, 2025 RFQ Responses Due April 4, 2025, 3:00 PM Review of RFQ By Panel Week of April 7, 2025 RFPs sent to Shortlisted Firms April 11, 2025. Interviews April 21, 2025 Selection of CMAR Week of April 21, 2025 Save-the-date, facility tours with AE and staff April 25, 2025 Council Contract Approval May 12, 2025 Start of Services May 2025 D. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS 138 Submissions should succinctly demonstrate the firm's ability to successfully manage a project of this scale. Responses must include the following sections: 1. Cover Letter Firm name, address, contact information Key contact person for the RFQ process Brief statement on why the firm is qualified for this project 2. Firm Overview & Experience Firm history, size, and organizational structure Relevant CMAR experience, including at least five (5) similar projects within the past 10 years Experience working with municipalities and community centers 3. Project Team & Key Personnel Resumes of key personnel, including the proposed Project Manager and Superintendent Summary of roles and responsibilities Experience working together as a team on similar projects 4. Project Approach Understanding of project goals and challenges Approach to cost control, scheduling, and risk management Strategies for engaging stakeholders and ensuring smooth project delivery Innovative approaches to energy efficiency and other long-term operational cost savings 5. References Contact information for at least three (3) municipal clients fo r whom similar work was completed 6. Financial & Legal Standing Confirmation of bonding capacity Disclosure of any litigation or claims history E. EVALUATION CRITERIA 139 Submissions will be evaluated based on the following criteria: Firm Experience & Qualifications (20%) Project Team & Key Personnel (30%) Project Approach & Understanding (40%) Quality & Thoroughness of Submission (10%) F. SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS All responses must be submitted electronically by April 4, 2025, at 3:00 p.m. to: Laurie Hokkanen City Manager lhokkanen@chanhassenmn.gov (952) 227-1119 Late submissions will not be considered. The City reserves the right to reject any or all submissions and to proceed in the best interest of the project. G. DISCLAIMER This RFQ is not a contract or an offer to contract. The City is not responsible for any costs associated with the preparation of responses. The City reserves the right to modify, cancel, or reissue the RFQ at its discretion. 140 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CHANHASSEN BLUFFS COMMUNITY CENTER Request for Qualifications Construction Manager at Risk April 4, 2025 830 Boone Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 CONTACT Brad Barickman Vice President Community 952-837-8614 brad.barickman@rjmconstruction.com 141 830 Boone Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 952-837-8600 RJMConstruction.com April 4, 2025 Laurie Hokkanen City Manager lhokkanen@chanhassenmn.gov 952-227-1119 RE: Construction Management At Risk (CMAR) Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center Dear Laurie, Thank you for considering RJM Construction, LLC for Construction Management Services for the Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center project. We welcome the opportunity to work with your team and BKV Group to bring your vision to fruition for the entire Chanhassen community. At RJM Construction, we are uniquely positioned to exceed the goals set by your project team, drawing on decades of expertise, innovative solutions, and a steadfast commitment to our clients. Our strengths are reflected in the following key areas: MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT EXPERTISE RJM Construction has a long-standing history of successful partnerships with over 50 municipalities. In 2007, we introduced the “hybrid” CM at Risk delivery model with the City of Eden Prairie, a testament to our innovative and solutions-oriented approach. Beyond the physical construction of facilities, we expertly manage state contract purchases, guide city staff through council approvals, and navigate the complexities of CM Advisor and CM at Risk frameworks. This breadth of experience positions RJM as a trusted and dependable partner. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT CHAMPIONS From community centers to ice arenas, senior centers, fitness facilities, parks, aquatics, and municipal administration buildings, RJM’s proposed team has extensive experience in designing and constructing state-of-the-art facilities. We understand the unique challenges municipalities face when there are multiple stakeholders who all deserve to be heard. RJM is well-versed in collaborating on projects with multiple stakeholders and will provide value and equity- based solutions to the team at every milestone. LOCAL PRIDE I, Brad Barickman, Vice President of Community, along with Ted Beckman, President of RJM, am proud to be a long- time resident of Chanhassen. Our deep connection to the community and its residents, coupled with our unwavering support for the facility, positions us as dedicated champions of its vision. We share a strong commitment to the facility’s mission of serving ‘every age, every stage.’ Together, we will lead the entire construction management team in fostering a sense of local pride while helping the community bring its aspirations to life. RJM Construction is prepared to engage immediately to contribute our experience and dedication to this important project. We appreciate the opportunity to work with the City of Chanhassen and are eager to move forward. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 952-837-8614 should you have any questions or require additional information. We look forward to partnering with you to bring this vision to life. Brad Barickman | Vice President Community | 952-837-8614 | brad.barickman@rjmconstruction.com 142 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 3 deliver driven to Our expertise ensures every step of your project vision is achieved. COVER LETTER FIRM OVERVIEW & EXPERIENCE PROJECT TEAM & KEY PERSONNEL PROJECT APPROACH REFERENCES FINANCIAL & LEGAL STANDING SURETY LETTER TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBITS 143 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 4 BUSINESS ORGANIZATION AND HISTORY Since our inception in 1997, RJM Construction LLC has grown into one of Minnesota’s premier contractors, known for our reliability and industry expertise. Headquartered in Golden Valley, Minnesota, and founded by Bob Jossart and Joe Maddy, RJM is now led by seasoned industry veterans President Ted Beckman and CEO/COO Brian Recker, both of whom have been pivotal leaders at RJM for nearly two decades. With an annual construction volume of approximately $250 million, RJM Construction employs 121 people, including office and staff personnel. Our dedicated professionals specialize in community, corporate, healthcare, and multi-housing projects. We offer a comprehensive range of services, including general contracting, construction management, design/build, and preconstruction, all tailored to meet the unique needs of our clients. RJM Construction has effectively delivered various construction contracts for private and public entities and non-profit organizations. We pioneered the Construction Manager at Risk approach with the City of Eden Prairie in 2007 and have since employed this method across several other cities in Minnesota. Combining extensive experience in creating detailed bid packages with innovative strategies, we ensure your projects proceed promptly and efficiently. Our proactive approach and deep expertise enable us to anticipate and overcome challenges, keeping projects on track and aligned with our clients’ vision and goals. Our commitment to client needs drives us to create extraordinary spaces through innovative, tailored, and cost-effective solutions. From preconstruction to project closeout, our meticulous management and unparalleled service ensure that each detail is thoughtfully handled. We are dedicated to nurturing a spirit of collaboration, ensuring that the spaces we create together enable our clients’ businesses and communities to thrive. FIRM OVERVIEW AND EXPERIENCE Ice Facilities 25+ Year Established 1997 Community Centers 20+ Minnesota communities served 50+ 144 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 5 Firm Overview & Experience THE RJM DIFFERENCE There is no substitute for experience when providing construction services. RJM has a deep portfolio of community and ice arena construction projects. We understand how to collaborate with all stakeholders to plan and execute the project requirements effectively. This experience assures the City of Chanhassen that RJM is a reliable, qualified partner. We will work as an extension of your staff, taking care of all construction details-so you can take care of your community. DIVERSE AND GROUNDED EXPERIENCE RJM is dedicated to working with communities and non-profit organizations in constructing community centers, ice arenas, municipal facilities, recreational facilities, public works buildings, higher education facilities, and charter schools. Our community work often comprises 40 percent of our yearly business, with projects ranging from renovations to new buildings, all serving the communities for years to come. RJM’s experience in arena construction ensures finishes in the arena to start/complete sooner than our competitors, resulting in a shorter overall project duration. ICE ARENA & COMMUNITY CENTER EXPERTISE RJM Construction specializes in the construction of ice arena and community centers, having completed over 40 projects in recent years. Ice arenas and community centers are unique facilities that must endure extreme climate fluctuations, particularly in Minnesota’s summer months. Key components require careful consideration, and we can collaborate directly with BKV’s design team to select the most cost effective and durable solutions: • Proper roofing material and insulation to limit condensation • Under-slab vapor barrier selection and placement to prevent concrete curling – equally important for ice arena, gym and artificial turf flooring surfaces • Rink slab and perimeter concrete scope of work assignment • Dehumidification systems and balancing to optimize efficiency and performance • Sequencing refrigeration system repairs and installation to ensure continuous use during the switchover • Analyzing waste-heat utilization for snow-melt and other efficiencies • Selecting and placing rink lighting (sequencing during construction) to ensure competition-level quality and spectator enjoyment 145 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 6 Firm Overview & Experience Ensuring the rink and fieldhouse slabs meets flatness and elevation tolerances is vital for ice-making and the efficiency of refrigeration equipment, and installation of fieldhouse flooring systems. With many ice arenas now serving as multi-purpose facilities, the appearance and finish of the rink floors are more important than ever. RJM has built numerous ice facilities of varying sizes and complexities. Our team knows how to construct an efficient ice arena, understanding the critical compo- nents involved, including a well-sequenced construction schedule and timely mate- rial procurement. We take a proactive approach to successfully guide each project from start to finish. STRENGTHENING THE PROCESS We work as an extension of your staff, analyzing all project details to achieve the best value. We understand there is extensive planning involved in getting a commu- nity project off the ground. Whether your project requires council approvals, public funds, or private investors, RJM Construction will act as your advocate. In tandem with approvals, our construction process includes assembling a project schedule and budget, considering every detail such as design milestones, permitting, and material procurement. Our experience and resources will guide the team to make well-in- formed, timely decisions. RJM takes pride in ownership of every project, managing risk from start to finish. CUSTOMIZED APPROACH RJM Construction is a diverse builder, allowing us to effectively deliver all types of construction contracts for public institutions and non-profit organizations. In addi- tion to traditional general contracting and design-build partnerships, our team has provided construction management services to over 50 local municipalities for more than 25 years. Forward-thinking communities have recognized that construction management offers a better alternative to the traditional design-bid-build method, giving organizations more control and confidence in project decisions. SIMILAR RELEVANT EXPERIENCE At RJM Construction, we prioritize understanding the unique goals and needs of every program. To deepen our insights, our team actively engages with ice arena and fieldhouse environments, learning firsthand what matters most to players, coaches, and fans. This hands-on approach enables us to create facilities that are not only functional but also impactful and meaningful to the communities they serve. Our recent projects with the City of Andover, City of Maple Grove, City of Elk River, and City of Alexandria reflect our expertise in delivering high-quality facilities tai- lored to municipal needs. These experiences have equipped us with the knowledge and skills to consistently provide cost-effective solutions, optimized programming, and streamlined project schedules. For the City of Chanhassen, this expertise translates into a facility designed with durability and quality in mind—capable of withstanding extensive use while serving as a vibrant community asset for years to come. 146 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 7 PROJECT ARCHITECT City of Alexandria Runestone Community Center and Ice Arena JLG Architects City of Eagan Community Center TKDA City of Maple Grove Community Center Expansion JLG Architects City of Andover Community Center and Ice Arena Perkins + Will & JLG Architects City of Bloomington Ice Arena JLG Architects City of Edina Hornets’ Nest Sperides Reiners Architects City of Northfield Ice Arena JLG Architects Treasure Island Center - TRIA Rink & Minnesota Wild Practice Facility Collaborative Design Group Furniture and Things Community Event Center and Ice Arena JLG Architects City of St. Louis Park Recreation Outdoor Center and Ice Arena RSP Architects City of Hopkins Pavilion Ice Arena Floor Replacement and Improvement JLG Architects City of Worthington Community Center BKV Group City of Rogers Ice Arena JLG Architects City of Edina Braemar Outdoor Ice Arena Cuningham City of Shakopee Communtiy Center and Ice Arena JLG Architects City of Shoreview Community Center Addition BWBR City of New Ulm Recreation Center Expansion JLG Architects City of Coon Rapids Ice Arena Perkins + Will Douglas Dayton YMCA at Gaviidae HGA City of Plymouth Ice Center JLG Architects St. Thomas Academy Ice Arena RSP Architects City of Red Wing Ice Arena JLG Architects City of Eden Prairie Community Center and Ice Arena Delano Erickson City of Watertown Prairie Lakes Ice Arena JLG Architects City of Maple Grove Central Park U+B Architecture & Design & Damon Farber NHL Arizona Coyotes Ice Den JLG Architects City of Chaska Community Center Ankeny Kell Architects COMMUNITY EXPERIENCE 147 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 8 PROJECT INFO CLIENT CITY OF MAPLE GROVE PROJECT TYPE COMMUNITY SQUARE FEET 248,000 SF ARCHITECT JLG ARCHITECTS RJM Construction has been appointed as the Construction Manager of the Maple Grove Community Center’s extensive two-phase expansion and renovation. This $110 million project is set to modernize the facility and introduce new amenities, addressing the needs of the growing Maple Grove community. Phase 1 focuses on substantial upgrades to the ice arena, which serves the Osseo Maple Grove Hockey Association (OMGHA), the second-largest youth hockey association in the U.S. Major enhancements include a new lobby entrance, significant renovations to the existing two rinks with updated refrigeration systems, and the addition of a third sheet of ice in a newly constructed, dedicated building that will be integrated with the main rink. The phase also includes creating team rooms, installing one-sided seating, and modernizing restroom finishes and fixtures. Additionally, site improvements will expand parking and upgrade the Lions Pavilion and play area. The first phase is scheduled to be completed and open to the public by October 2025. Phase 2 of the project will include a renovated aquatics area, additional space for senior programs, expanded event and banquet facilities, dedicated arts spaces, a walking track, and infrastructure upgrades such as an updated roof and mechanical systems. MAPLE GROVE COMMUNITY CENTER EXPANSION MAPLE GROVE, MINNESOTA 148 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 9 Back in 2012, Southwest Christian High School’s initial campus had 187 students. Before long, their enrollment grew and so did the need for more athletic space. RJM Construction was hired by Southwest Christian High School (SWCHS) to work alongside BGW Architects to construct a 48,000-square-foot fieldhouse expansion and increase the space for athletic practices and events in all types of weather. This new precast expansion includes a batting cage area that doubles as the required International Code Council (ICC)-500 storm shelter. ICC-500 is known as the governing standard for the design and construction of storm shelters. Three practice basketball courts, a weight room, conference rooms, locker rooms, storage rooms, a concession area, and a sprinting track are also included in the new fieldhouse. PROJECT INFO CLIENT SOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN ACADEMY PROJECT TYPE EDUCATION SQUARE FEET 48,000 SF ARCHITECT BGW ARCHITECTS SOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN ACADEMY CHASKA, MINNESOTA 149 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 10 PROJECT INFO CLIENT CITY OF ELK RIVER PROJECT TYPE COMMUNITY SQUARE FEET 101,000 SF ARCHITECT JLG ARCHITECTS RJM Construction proudly built the Furniture and Things Community Event Center and Ice Arena, a state-of-the-art facility designed to serve the diverse needs of the Elk River community. Key features include two sheets of ice, a walking track, a senior center, community rooms, a turf field house, two new softball fields, a pavilion, a concessions building, and expanded parking. Our team worked closely with JLG Architects to enhance constructability and cost-effectiveness for proposed design changes. RJM Construction’s proactive recommendations significantly contributed to the building’s performance longevity and the durability of exterior spaces. This facility is a vital asset to the community, accommodating a wide range of activities from small gatherings and youth and adult athletics to large-scale events with up to 1,600 attendees. The innovative design and construction of the Furniture and Things Community Event Center and Ice Arena ensure it will be a hub of community engagement and activity for years to come. FURNITURE AND THINGS ICE ARENA ELK RIVER, MINNESOTA 150 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 11 PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY CENTER PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA The City of Plymouth partnered with RJM Construction and HGA Architects to build their newly renovated and expanded 76,000-square-foot community center. Along with numerous amenities, the new facility includes an Event Wing, Education Wing, and an Active Wing to meet the needs and wants of the rapidly-growing community. The facility includes two full-size gymnasiums, a K.U.B.E indoor playground, a new all-season indoor walking track, rooms for various educational and recreational activities, dance and fitness studios, an art gallery, and more. This is an energy-efficient, state- of-the-art design using sustainable materials and technology. From Solatube lighting to quality recycled materials on various components, it demonstrates the innovation and strong collaboration of the entire team. PROJECT INFO CLIENT CITY OF PLYMOUTH PROJECT TYPE COMMUNITY SQUARE FEET 110,000 SF ARCHITECT HGA ARCHITECTS 151 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 12 RJM Construction led the significant renovations and expansion of the Andover Community Center and its sports complex, a two-phase project spanning over 80,000-square-feet. This comprehensive project included the installation of a new sheet of ice, a walking track, offices, meeting spaces, and a multipurpose field house. Additionally, the project featured the construction of a new building entrance and lobby, extensions of the east and west parking lots, and the installation of modern curtain wall systems. The expanded sports complex now boasts two ice arenas, a five- court field house, an indoor aquatic park with two pools, an upper- level fitness center, exercise studios, and a kid’s gymnasium. These enhancements provide the community with a versatile and state-of- the-art facility for a wide range of activities and events. To achieve this, RJM utilized pre-cast concrete, masonry, exposed wood structures, and advanced curtain wall systems, ensuring both durability and aesthetic appeal. The Andover Community Center and Ice Arena now stands as a premier destination for sports, fitness, and recreation, fostering community engagement and activity. CITY OF ANDOVER COMMUNITY CENTER AND EXPANSION ANDOVER, MINNESOTA PROJECT INFO CLIENT CITY OF ANDOVER PROJECT TYPE COMMUNITY SQUARE FEET 210,000 SF ARCHITECT JLG ARCHITECTS PERKINS + WILL 152 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 13 PROJECT INFO CLIENT CITY OF WATERTOWN PROJECT TYPE COMMUNITY SQUARE FEET 94,000 SF ARCHITECT JLG ARCHITECTS After nearly 10 years of discussions and securing a $20 million bond, the City of Watertown engaged RJM Construction and South Dakota-based Crestone Companies to design and construct the 94,000-square-foot Prairie Lakes Ice Arena. The project was carefully planned and executed to meet the community’s needs. Today, the Prairie Lakes Ice Arena hosts state and regional tournaments, featuring two NHL-sized ice rinks with plans to accommodate a potential third rink in the future. The main rink has a seating capacity of 1,523 spectators and has been likened by JLG Architects Senior Principal, Tom Betti, to a scaled-down version of the Xcel Energy Center—home of the Minnesota Wild. The second rink serves as a practice rink with seating for 250 people. The main rink is situated three feet lower than the main floor, offering excellent views of the ice and maximizing space for team rooms. The second floor includes spectator seating, a walking track, and a media box for filming games or hosting DJs during open skate sessions. The arena also features public amenities, including a concession stand, skate rental services, space for a pro shop, and rentable areas for conferences and private parties. It continues to serve as a vibrant community hub, welcoming individuals of all ages. PRAIRIE LAKES ICE ARENA WATERTOWN, SOUTH DAKOTA 153 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 14 PRECONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION BRAD BARICKMAN PROJECT PRINCIPAL KEY Construction Preconstruction BRIAN RECKERBRIAN POGALZ PROJECT EXECUTIVECHIEF ESTIMATOR CHRIS LIEDMAN MEP DIRECTOR KRISTEN JACOBS COMMUNITY OUTREACH KALE FISCHER SAFETY DIRECTOR MIKE JOHNSON DIRECTOR OF QUALITY CONTROL RYAN POTOCNIK PROJECT MANAGER JEFF MAUDER SUPERINTENDENT MONTE HILLEMAN SUSTAINABILITY COORDINATOR | SIG PROJECT TEAM 154 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 15 BRAD BARICKMAN PROJECT PRINCIPAL 952-837-8614 brad.barickman@rjmconstruction.com Brad has been in the construction industry for more than 20 years. With his diverse background, he brings multiple perspectives to the project team, ensuring that we meet and exceed client goals. Brad draws heavily on experience to anticipate project needs and will delegate the proper resources to complete the requirements efficiently. From complex community ground-up facilities and renovation projects, to healthcare and corporate work, his proven dedication to budget control, value analysis, construction sequencing, and disruption avoidance is always evident in the quality of the finished product. As the Vice President of Community, Brad exemplifies leadership, providing strategic direction and management within the respective market sector. He bears ultimate responsibility for establishing profitable projects and upholding a superior level of client satisfaction. While Brad’s highly motivated and task-oriented approach sets a standard for everyone on the team, he is also focused on creating and maintaining long-term relationships with clients, understanding their needs and challenges, and helping them make their project vision come to life. ROLE DESCRIPTION RELEVANT EXPERIENCE REFERENCES PROJECT LOCATION Maple Grove Community Center Maple Grove, MN Northfield Ice Arena Northfield, MN Prairie Lakes Ice Arena Watertown, SD Andover Community Center Expansion Andover, MN Elk River Furniture & Things Community Event Center Elk River, MN Plymouth Community Center Plymouth, MN Southwest Christian High School Fieldhouse Addition Chaska, MN Shakopee Community Center & Ice Shakopee, MN Shoreview Community Center Shoreview, MN Bloomington Ice Garden Bloomington, MN Mr. Chuck Stifter City of Maple Grove 763-494-6000 Mr. Matt Podhradsky City of Chaska 952-448-9200 Ms. Renae Clark City of Bloomington 952-563-8890 Mr. Tom Betti JLG Architects 651-767-3773 Ms. Nancy Blankfard HGA Architects 612-758-4390 Mr. Todd LaVold Leo A. Daly 612-359-4656 AWARDS EDUCATION LEED AP Bachelor of Science Construction Engineering Iowa State University 155 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 16 BRIAN RECKER PROJECT EXECUTIVE 612-919-3538 brian.recker@rjmconstruction.com Brian Recker has been in the commercial construction industry for over 30 years. Throughout his career he has held various positions including project manager, estimator, senior vice president, and his current role as CEO. In his 20+ years with RJM, Brian has managed a variety of municipal projects including community and public works facilities, ice arenas, aquatic facilities, fitness centers, and outdoor spaces, as well as healthcare and corporate work. In his role as Project Executive, Brian will oversee contract administration, manage project budgets, and ensure that the project stays on schedule. His leadership ensures the seamless flow of information across the team, fostering strong team relationships and clear communication. Brian’s proactive approach in maintaining real-time decision-making enhances project efficiency, streamlining day-to-day activities while upholding the highest standards of quality. With his proven track record of managing numerous similar projects to the Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center, Brian is committed to delving exceptional results for this project and ensuring long-term client satisfaction. ROLE DESCRIPTIONEDUCATION Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering University of Minnesota Masters in Business Administration UMN - Carlson School of Management RELEVANT EXPERIENCE PROJECT LOCATION City of Rogers Activity Center and Ice Arena Rogers, MN City of Andover Ice Arena and Community Center Expansion Andover, MN City of Maple Grove Community Center Maple Grove, MN Furniture and Things Community Event Center and Ice Arena Elk River, MN City of St. Louis Park ROC St. Louis Park, MN City of Hopkins Ice Arena Hopkins, MN City of Shakopee Community Center and Ice Arena Shakopee, MN City of Plymouth Community Center Plymouth, MN City of Alexandria Runestone Community Center Alexandria, MN REFERENCES Mr. Cal Portner City of Elk River 763-635-1001 Mr. Chuck Stifter City of Maple Grove 763-494-6501 Mr. Jay Lotthammer (Former) City of Eden Prairie 952-949-8440 Mr. Victor Pechaty Gensler Architects 617-619-5853 Mr. Tom Betti JLG Architects 612-767-3773 Ms. Nancy Blankfard HGA Architects 612-758-4000 156 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 17 RYAN POTOCNIK PROJECT MANAGER II 612-356-9833 ryan.potocnik@rjmconstruction.com ROLE DESCRIPTION RELEVANT EXPERIENCE REFERENCES PROJECT LOCATION Maple Grove Community Center Maple Grove, MN Prairie Lakes Ice Arena Watertown, SD Northfield Ice Arena Northfield, MN Daikin Applied Owatonna Office Upgrades Owatonna, MN Haven Homes Senior Health and Living Maple Plain, MN EDUCATION Ryan brings 11 years of valuable expertise to the project team with his well-rounded history including community and education projects varying in size and complexity. Key Responsibilities: -Plan project workflow including schedule, materials, and workforce -Assist estimating team during preconstruction including final bidding -Proactively reassess project scope based on new information and analysis -Closely monitor schedule, budget, and quality to ensure project vision is achieved -Work with superintendent and consultants to drive efficiencies -Recommend course of action based on client needs and requirements With Ryan’s strong attention to detail, he helps to facilitate the successful delivery of cost, schedule, and quality on every project to which he is assigned. Ryan has worked diligently to hone the necessary skills to handle each project’s unique set of challenges with efficiency and tact, never losing sight of the client’s goals. With a driven personality and client-focused approach, Ryan is a critical part of the team, helping to deliver a successful project, on time and within budget. TRAINING & CERTS OSHA 30 Bachelor of Science Construction Management University of Minnesota Mr. Troy Gray Daikin Applied 954-862-8500 Mr. Mike Van Klei Tegra 651-755-3860 Mr. Heath VonEye City of Watertown 605-882-6202 Mr. Rick Mack JLG Architects 612-746-4260 157 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 18 ROLE DESCRIPTION Jeff has over 25 years of experience in the commercial construction industry. He is knowledgeable in all facets of the job site from site work to final interior finishes. Working in tandem with RJM’s project manager, Jeff is accountable for running the day-to-day operations on the construction site and closely monitoring the project schedule to achieve project success. Jeff will work to keep the entire team informed of the project’s on-site status, and will ensure cost-effective solutions, procedures and methods are upheld at all times. Key Responsibilities: -Direct all field personnel and manage subcontractor activities -Ensure that quality control standards and safety protocols are upheld at all times -Maintain construction schedule and proactively identify and resolve any disruptions -Order materials, schedule inspections as necessary -Maintain regular communications and positive relationships with clients, contractors, vendors, and team members -Maintain an efficient, organized, safe, and clean job site JEFF MAUDER SUPERINTENDENT 952-837-8600 jeff.mauder@rjmconstruction.com RELEVANT EXPERIENCE REFERENCES PROJECT LOCATION Bloomington Ice Garden Bloomington, MN St. Louis Park ROC Ice Arena St. Louis Park, MN Cottage Grove Ice Arena and High School Cottage Grove, MN North Metro Range Regional Public Safety Maple Grove, MN Forest Lake YMCA Forest Lake, MN Twin Cities Orthopedics Waconia Expansion Waconia, MN Twin Cities Orthopedics Stillwater Stillwater, MN Mr. Keith Heimer Twin Cities Orthopedics 651-351-2697 Ms. Joanna Pineda Minnesota Community Care 651-602-7538 Mr. Mark Davis Davis Group 612-341-3242 Mr. Pat Giordana Synergy Architectural Studio 612-383-2701 Mr. Denton Mack Sperides Reiners Architects 952-996-9662 Mr. Matthew Finn LHB 612-338-2029 TRAINING & CERTS OSHA 10, OSHA 30 SWPPP 158 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 19 ROLE DESCRIPTION EXPERIENCE Monte Hilleman serves as the leader of the Climate Investment Solutions department at Sustainable Investment Group (SIG), where he oversees market-based strategies to finance decarbonization efforts. Within SIG, he directs a range of offerings, including Net Zero Proformas and Portfolio analysis, Green Financing tools, and transactions involving Renewable Energy Credits and Carbon Offsets. These initiatives are supported by his extensive knowledge of financial incentives such as the Inflation Reduction Act, Property Assessed Clean Energy Financing (PACE), and various other federal, state, and local green finance incentives. Prior to joining SIG, Hilleman spent almost two decades leading the sustainable development mission of the Saint Paul Port Authority. His exceptional work in this role earned him industry accolades, such as being recognized as the Person of the Year by Brownfield Renewal Magazine and inclusion in the Twin Cities Business Journal’s Forty Under 40 list. During his tenure, he was responsible for managing a portfolio of 21 business centers with over 550 companies and more than 25,000 employees. Simultaneously, he spearheaded the development of new large-scale projects. As the leader of ‘The Heights’ development, Hilleman orchestrated the transformation of a contaminated 112-acre golf course into a Net Zero Energy community. This ambitious project involved comprehensive carbon emissions inventories, circular economy strategies, and social equity initiatives. The development encompassed over 1 million square feet of light industrial space, creating 1,000+ jobs and over 1,000 housing units across various types. Monte managed multiple redevelopment sites concurrently, coordinating multiple consultant teams (design, engineering, legal, construction, etc.). The projects he oversaw encompassed over 200 acres of land and received over $125 million in public sector investment and over $1.5 billion in private investment. Monte’s expertise has led him to become a recurring lecturer for numerous educational and industry associations. Additionally, he holds a license as a MN Commercial Real Estate Broker. MONTE HILLEMAN VICE PRESIDENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESILIENCY, COMPLIANCE & INVESTMENT | SIG 651-338-1039 monteh@sigearth.com EDUCATION Bachelor of Arts Urban Studies - Urban Infrastructure & Ecology University of Minnesota EXPERIENCE 28 Years in Industry 159 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 20 SUPPORT TEAM chris.liedman@rjmconstruction.com CHRIS LIEDMAN MEP DIRECTOR As RJM’s Director of Mechanical Electrical and Plumbing Design and Coordination, Chris will provide MEP expertise from design through occupancy and optimized facility operations. Chris has a reputation for understanding the client’s goals, digging into details and using a collaborative approach to achieve project objectives. He has dedicated his career to expertise in facility infrastructure and systems, optimizing occupant comfort, code compliance, energy efficiency, and total cost of ownership. mike.johnson@rjmconstruction.com MIKE JOHNSON DIRECTOR OF QUALITY CONTROL As Director of Quality Control, Mike is responsible for providing insight and guidance to project teams ensuring that the RJM Construction quality control procedures are in place and all tasks are implemented and carried out. He makes certain that projects are in compliance and processes are upheld through every phase, from start up to close out. His proven leadership, superior work ethic, and detailed execution ensures that quality is at the forefront of every project. kale.fischer@rjmconstruction.com KALE FISCHER SAFETY DIRECTOR As Safety Director, Kale provides oversight directly in relation to the safety aspects of every project. He analyzes the proposed safety plan and offers guidance to the team for continual improvement. Kale leads subcontractors through the RJM safety orientation prior to the start of project work. Combining his hands-on experience with his keen attention to detail and communication skills, Kale ensures that safety is held to the highest standard to ensure project success and client satisfaction. kristen.jacobs@rjmconstruction.com KRISTEN JACOBS COMMUNITY OUTREACH Kristen brings 18 years of communication experience, specializing in engaging with stakeholders to understand their needs, concerns, and aspirations. She has a remarkable ability to establish trust and foster candid conversations, making her a reliable partner in building strong relationships. Kristen has significant expertise in strategy development and execution, combined with marketing experience to drive project promotion and enthusiasm. 160 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 21 PROJECT APPROACH UNDERSTANDING PROJECT GOALS- ADDRESSING CHALLENGES Our team understands the community goal of every age, every stage. Our team understands the programming goals to achieve (2) multi-purpose ice arena spaces, walking/running areas, multiple hard-court spaces, multiple artificial turf spaces, indoor playground, fitness and dance space, locker rooms, and communal spaces. With a broad portfolio in sports and community construction, RJM possesses extensive experience in addressing common challenges and the potential for competing program interests. By employing the strategies outlined below, RJM can effectively tackle the obstacles inherent in constructing sports and community facilities, thus achieving successful project outcomes that benefit the community and stakeholders alike. Comprehensive Planning: Leverage past experience to conduct thorough planning, including feasibility studies and risk assessments, to anticipate potential challenges and develop mitigation strategies. While RJM was not part of the feasibility study and pre-referendum work a new and experienced perspective will ensure all program needs are met. Stakeholder Engagement: Utilize strong communication skills to engage stakeholders at all levels, including local residents, community groups, and government agencies, to build consensus and address concerns proactively. Leverage key members of the RJM Construction team, which are long standing Chanhassen residents. Strategic Partnerships: Work collaboratively with experienced architects at BKV Group, engineers, subcontractors, and suppliers to leverage their expertise and resources in overcoming challenges and optimizing project outcomes. Effective Project Management: Implement robust project management practices to ensure efficient coordination and oversight of all project activities, from design and procurement to construction and operations. Quality Control and Assurance: Prioritize quality control and assurance measures to ensure that construction activities meet or exceed industry standards and project specifications, minimizing rework and delays. “RJM was instrumental in making the Southwest Christian High School athletic complex a success. They showed great early leadership, were easy to work with and delivered on what they sold. I would work with the entire RJM team that worked on this project anytime.” - Josh Felix, AIA BGW Architects 161 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 22 Project Approach Sustainability and Environmental Compliance: Incorporate sustainable construction practices and green building principles into the project to minimize environmental impact and promote long-term sustainability in compliance with applicable regulations and standards. Community Outreach and Engagement: Proactively engage with the local community through outreach initiatives and public meetings to provide updates on project progress and address any concerns or feedback. Continuous Improvement: Foster a culture of continuous improvement within the construction team by encouraging innovation, sharing best practices, and learning from past experiences to optimize project performance. Safety and Health: Prioritize the safety and health of workers, stakeholders, and the surrounding community throughout the construction process by implementing comprehensive safety protocols and enforcing strict adherence to safety regulations and standards. PRECONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN At RJM Construction, our work begins long before a project starts. We design our preconstruction to anticipate challenges and develop efficient solutions to ensure successful project delivery. Our team will add value by creating a feasible project vision, providing solutions to building challenges, and identifying ways to create value for the investment. ENGAGING STAKEHOLDERS-COMMUNICATION City Council Meetings/Workshops: RJM will provide updates to the City Council at every major project milestone. The updates will consist of high-level progress updates through the estimating and pre-construction process. Community Open Houses: RJM will participate in community open houses to promote the project and do it’s part in rallying the community around the project and ensuring every age, at every stage is the primary focus. Project Information Collaboration: RJM leverages Procore, a comprehen- sive project management platform, to ensure successful outcomes for all project stakeholders. A single, collaborative location for all project stakeholders to ac- cess and securely share live project documentation. ESTIMATING TECHNIQUES At the core of RJM’s preconstruction team are six full-time estimators. This team en- sures estimates are accurate and completed on time without the daily distractions of project management. Our team has an extensive database, comprehensive proce- dures, and the experience to produce accurate and timely estimates. RJM’s estimating team utilizes various technological resources to develop a cost model. Materials are quantified with precision in eTakeoff/Dimension and paired with our unit cost database, which is maintained via Sage Estimating. We also rely on virtual building models (BIM) to ensure estimating accuracy. 162 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 23 Project Approach RJM’s cost estimating process is entirely open book. We provide detailed information supporting our numbers in an open forum with the project team. An estimate summa- ry will highlight the major categories of work and associated costs. In addition, RJM provides a detailed estimate, showing all cost categories by the specification section. These resources will allow the team to make educated decisions. As the design pro- gresses, we provide continuous, real-time cost evaluation so that we immediately re- alize the cost impact to design choices. Being proactive in this process saves critical time and cost, helping BKV understand budget impacts before designs are complete. STATE STATUTE CM AT RISK BIDDING REQUIREMENTS CONCEPTUAL PHASE: SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE: DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE: This estimate is completed by reviewing the general project scope and utilizing gross square footage estimates. Key elements such as soil corrections, utilities, and unique features are accounted for as well as the more standard features of the project. At the start, SD estimates are applied to more detailed square footages. At this point, we are beginning to lock in on the overall layout of the building and can start to develop costs based on the desired finish. By the completion of this phase, the estimate will be supported with actual quantities of construction systems. This analysis will save design team resources and allow you to look at multiple scenarios for structure, enclosure, interiors, etc. As the estimate moves through this phase, unit quantities will be available to produce a very detailed estimate. The project’s budget will develop its final details at the end of this phase. This estimate will be fully supported by subcontractor feedback to gain valuable market insight. RJM’S DESIGN PROCESS KEY STEPS: THE RJM DIFFERENCE Our team provides a final estimate at 95% completion of the design. This is different from other construction managers. The intent of this final estimate is to confirm the 95% drawings and specifications align with the budget and that we have 100% subcontractor support to prove it. This final confirmation allows us to accurately track the expected final bid amounts when received. Allowing one last opportunity to make slight adjustments to the plans prior to bidding assures the project will be delivered on budget. RJM’s unique process will bring immediate value to the City of Chanhassen given the current status of the design is near completion. If hired, RJM will recommend this be the first step in the process before finalizing bid documents. RJM’s extensive experience with recreation and community center projects gives us a diverse list of subcontracting partners we can carefully analyze and then tailor the bid and quote packages to meet the City’s needs. 163 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 24 Project Approach As noted previously, RJM Construction pioneered the CM at Risk delivery method with municipalities with the City of Eden Prairie in 2007. In 2023 the state of Minne- sota passed legislation officially declaring CM at Risk a legal procurement method for Minnesota cities. RJM has essentially had a “head start” over the competition over the last 15 plus years, having developed a transparent and equity-based program for bidding that has benefited a number of Minnesota municipalities. It starts with a broad sweep of the market during the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process. This ensures all contractors capable of performing work on your project have an equal op- portunity to become prequalified. After prequalification’s are received the Request for Bid (RFB) is issued to all preapproved contractors. The bids are reviewed with city staff and the design team. Contractors are then selected, and the Guaranteed Maxi- mum Price (GMP) is set with the City Council. CITY COUNCIL OPTIONS The most successful projects are when our team provides the city council with the appropriate number of options. This starts with options during the design phase. The BKV team is hired to maximize program and design, so the project budget will cer- tainly be challenged. However, with an experienced ice arena/community center con- struction team, the project can become a reality within budget by developing options for the stakeholder team’s consideration. Those options can consist of clear commu- nication for timing to accept alternates, allowances to include in the GMP, or stages of completion (shell, finish, complete) for specific areas. A great example is after the design is complete, bid day alternate material selections or scope revisions that can be made after bids are in hand. If the project bids are favorable to the overall budget, items such as future long term scope options can be added back in. If the project bids are unfavorable to the overall budget, items can be eliminated. This is a very import- ant tool and even more so given today’s current market conditions. Our priority is to ensure the city council is never put at risk. As previously mentioned, we’ve developed strategies to procure long-lead material items ahead of finalizing bids for the entire project. For instance, structural steel or precast wall panels can be ordered early, ensuring their availability on-site without delays. This approach requires only a modest financial commitment for engineering and shop drawings. Importantly, the city would not be obligated to purchase the materials themselves, but rather to secure the engineering work and a production slot. This achieves two key benefits: it accelerates the project timeline and helps mitigate additional material cost inflation. TAX-EXEMPT OR TAX REBATE PROCESS RJM has successfully utilized a tax-exempt or tax rebate strategy with other munic- ipalities. If the City of Chanhassen is interested, RJM will solicit separate labor and material bids from select subcontractors to take advantage of tax savings on large material purchases. The bid documents specify that only the lowest combined labor and material bids will be awarded as the lowest combined bid. If approved by the City of Chanhassen, this strategy can save the city in excess of $500,000. 164 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 25 Project Approach VALUE ENGINEERING Value engineering is an essential process during design. We prioritize value engi- neering to enhance project efficiency without compromising quality. By scrutinizing construction plans and methodologies, we identify opportunities for cost savings and performance improvements while maintaining project integrity. RJM’s job is to pro- vide the team with cost-saving ideas available for the team’s review and subsequent implementation. Drawing from similar project experience, our team understands how to reduce costs without sacrificing the building’s function or design intent. RJM believes that the most effective way to increase value is to look for it at every design stage. RJM reviews multiple systems related to foundations, structures, enclosures, roofs, and mechanical and electrical to ensure the most effective installation and the utilization of materials that will last. CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEWS RJM leverages its extensive experience, collaborative approach, and commitment to excellence to provide exceptional constructability reviews. We are dedicated to contributing to the success of our clients’ construction projects by identifying op- portunities for improvement, mitigating risks, and optimizing the overall construc- tion process. RJM’s constructability reviews are continuous during design. We em- phasize early-stage intervention to identify potential challenges and opportunities during the design phase. This proactive approach ensures that potential issues are addressed before they escalate, resulting in cost savings and streamlined project timelines. RJM’s director of quality control also closely reviews design documents at each phase. After this careful review process, RJM may suggest minor design modifi- cations to BKV Group. As an added element of quality risk management, RJM recom- mends a third-party plan/details review for all critical building components, such as waterproofing, roofing, and building envelope systems. PROGRAMMING INPUT Understanding the importance of the big-picture process and the necessity for adaptable spaces within the project design, RJM is committed to collaborating close- ly with the BKV Group design team. Together, we identify various scenarios that ac- commodate flexible and adaptable spaces, leveraging our expertise in construction management to provide valuable insights and recommendations. This collaborative effort ensures the development of versatile layouts that cater to diverse user needs and future adaptability requirements. RJM’s experience in community and recre- ational facilities and multiple stakeholders will provide valuable solutions/options for the design team and city. As an example, we will provide recommendations for space flexibility /adaptability should the facility elect for future expansion. RJM can work hand in hand with the team to lend our experience in working with other programs such as the YMCA, YWCA, and municipalities. RJM’s experience in this forum was in- strumental in moving the City of New Ulm Recreation Center forward. RJM was able to draw on our past experience with the City of Worthington YMCA to help the team develop a “right size” program model that worked for their community. By adopting this forward-thinking approach, we ensure that the project design aligns seam- lessly with the City of Chanhassen’s long-term goals and objectives, fostering a more resilient and adaptable built environment. Historically, our value engineering process has saved 9-13% in value between schematic design and construction documents. 165 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 26 Project Approach RJM SUSTAINABILITY PROGRAM EXPERIENCE AND APPROACH Many paths and resources are available to help meet project goals for sustainability. Our team has considerable experience working with a variety of sustainability pro- grams. While these programs have fluctuated in popularity over the last decade, we continuously promote and practice sustainable initiatives on our projects regardless of designation or requirement. The RJM team is an experienced partner in sustain- able building practices, including Buildings, Benchmarks, & Beyond (B3), LEED, and ILFI Net Zero Energy (NZE). Our team has completed over 20 projects designed with this benchmarking. RJM was an active team member during preconstruction and de- sign for all projects listed below, providing valuable cost and schedule input on sus- tainable materials and systems. In addition to completing a comprehensive review of what design considerations need to be considered to meet the certification program requirements. As with all certification programs, MEP systems and design are critical and often the costliest upfront decisions. RJM’s sustainability consulting partner, Sig Earth will work alongside the BKV Group during the design phase to provide valuable cost payback analysis and constructability input on systems being reviewed. Their un- derstanding of upfront costs and long-term paybacks has proven to streamline deci- sion-making during the design phase. The team brings extensive facilities operations experience and thoroughly understands the importance of controls and function from the end-user’s perspective. Without this well-rounded experience, teams risk making short-sighted decisions that have long-term impacts. Our expertise in under- standing the submittal timeline and historical cost information on sustainable build- ing products and systems will add value and ensure the project remains on schedule from design to closeout. Climate Investment Solutions – With over 20 years of commercial real estate and green financing experience, across hundreds of projects, RJM and SIG can help you find the financial solutions to achieve your climate and sustainability goals. With the deployment of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in 2023, real estate companies and building owners have the opportunity to take advantage of billions of federal dollars and tax benefits flowing through multiple federal departments. Combined with es- tablished programs such as Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) and green bank financing for energy efficiency and renewables and the new incentives coming to the marketplace frequently, private, public, non-profit, and tax-exempt real estate own- ers are leaving money on the table if they do not leverage these resources. The IRA and other green financing mechanisms require a multidisciplinary under- standing of commercial real estate development and financing, sustainable design, carbon transition risk, energy modeling, building operations & maintenance, ESG, green appraisal/valuation, local law compliance, brokerage/leasing, tax equity, tax credit accounting and legal implications, and more – much of which we can provide as a one-stop shop, build a team, and/or plug into and advise your licensed financial and legal professionals, as appropriate. 166 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 27 Project Approach The Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center project can benefit dramatically from the energy tax credits expanded by the Inflation Reduction Act. The Investment Tax Credit (ITC) for geothermal heating/cooling systems and solar photovoltaic systems now benefit tax-exempt ‘taxpayers’ via Elective Pay/Direct Pay. This results in a cash payment (generally 30-50% of eligible energy property costs) from the federal gov- ernment instead of a tax credit. The first Direct Pay checks started to arrive across the United States in 4Q24. And, it appears highly unlikely that these energy tax cred- its, heavily utilized across the energy sector, will be subject to repeal with the new administration. OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY AND SUSTAINABILITY RJM recognizes the paramount importance of operational efficiency and sustainabil- ity in the design and construction of the new Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center. These key drivers are critical for several reasons: Economic Benefits: Operational efficiency and sustainability measures can result in cost savings over the lifetime of the facility. By reducing energy and resource con- sumption, the facility can lower utility bills and operational expenses, leading to long- term economic benefits. Environmental Stewardship: Prioritizing sustainability in construction minimizes the sports complex’s environmental footprint. Implementing green building prac- tices, such as energy-efficient systems and materials, reduces greenhouse gas emis- sions, waste generation, and resource depletion, contributing to environmental con- servation efforts. Social Impact: An operationally efficient and sustainable sports complex enhances the well-being of its users and surrounding communities. Features such as improved indoor air quality, natural lighting, and access to green spaces promote the health and comfort of users, fostering a positive and inclusive recreational environment. Regulatory Compliance: Incorporating sustainability measures ensures compliance with environmental regulations and standards. By adhering to these requirements, the project mitigates regulatory risks and maintains a positive relationship with reg- ulatory authorities, avoiding potential penalties and delays. Community Engagement: Building a sustainable sports complex demonstrates a commitment to community values and sustainability goals. Engaging stakeholders throughout the design and construction process fosters collaboration and transpar- ency, garnering support and buy-in from the local community. Long-Term Viability: Operational efficiency and sustainability measures enhance the long-term viability and resilience of the sports complex. By investing in durable materials, efficient systems, and adaptive design features, the facility can adapt to changing needs, market trends, and environmental conditions, ensuring its continued relevance and functionality for years to come. By prioritizing operational efficiency and sustainability in the construction of the new fieldhouse facility, RJM aims to create a state-of-the-art sports complex that not only meets the needs of its users but also contributes positively to the economic, environ- mental, and social well-being of the school and surrounding community. 167 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 28 Project Approach Our experience in understanding the submittal timeline and historical cost information on sustainable building products and systems will add value and ensure the project remains on schedule from design to closeout. Project Examples • Plymouth Community Center: B-3 • HERO Center: B-3 • Alexandria Community Center: B-3 • North Metro Range: B-3 • TRANE: LEED Gold • Twin Cities Orthopedics: LEED NC • Gold PepsiCo: LEED CI Silver • AON Benfield: LEED-CI Gold • HGA Architects Headquarters: LEED-CI Platinum • Ford Center Renovation: LEED Gold • Xcel Energy Fleet Services Building: LEED Silver • Adelante Healthcare Peoria: LEED Gold • Loose Wiles Building Renovation: LEED Certified • LHB Architects: LEED-CI Platinum • CenterPoint Energy: LEED Silver • District Energy: LEED Gold and under the category of Green Building Design • Hmong College Prep Academy Phase III: LEED Certified • American Family Insurance EP Remodel (aka Regional Headquarters): LEED Silver • Westwood Hills Nature Center: ILFI Net Zero Energy (NZE) MEP COORDINATION zin constructability reviews. RJM’s Director of MEP Design and Coordination, Chris Liedman, will analyze the mechanical and electrical designs. A licensed engineer, Chris fully understands detailed MEP scopes and can guide prefabrication and installation plans. Combined, these unique resources enable the project team to make informed decisions, resulting in the best solution at maximum value. Important to note con- struction managers that lack experience in ice arena and fieldhouse construction will often significantly underestimate the cost of HVAC systems. This misunderstanding will lead owners down an unfortunate path and create significant budget challenges on bid day. With RJM’s experienced MEP staff paired with ice arena construction experience, owners can confidently rely on preliminary estimates. CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT 168 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 29 Project Approach In addition to managing the overall schedule, the RJM project manager is the primary point of contact. They will manage all forms of documentation and information flow during construction. Key responsibilities include contract administration, budget management, and the project schedule. In addition, we will issue meeting minutes, coordinate Request for Information (RFIs), and maintain daily coordination of all on- site construction. We will coordinate subcontractors, material deliveries, and the site labor force to exceed expectations for quality, safety, cost control, and schedule. ON-SITE SUPERVISION RJM’s superintendent will be on site every day during construction. Daily huddles with RJM personnel, subcontractors, and the City’s point person will ensure that all team members are informed of the day’s scope of work, safety reviews, quality assur- ance, and scheduled deliveries. At the RJM weekly progress meetings, RJM’s superintendent will provide the follow- ing: • Current status of the work phasing plan • Confirmation of which areas are impacted by the work • Safety and site logistics confirmation • Three-week look-ahead schedule • Quality assurance and installation reviews SCHEDULE MANAGEMENT As an early adopter of LEAN construction principles, RJM Construction incorporates details gained through recent market experience, constructability reviews, subcon- tractor-provided information regarding critical timelines and material lead times, and critical path milestones to establish a preliminary construction schedule. RJM Construction then conducts pull-planning sessions with the complete subcontractor base to ensure these resources align with the project expectations. These sessions al- low us to validate sequencing, evaluate potential efficiency gains, and establish com- mitments to activity durations and crew sizes to produce a master schedule to meet or improve our initial schedule goals. Once construction begins, we can offer produc- tivity assessments and variance reports to monitor workforce needs, ultimately pro- tecting the project schedule. RJM supports the entire project team by establishing a comprehensive schedule considering all critical milestones - beginning with project development and culminating with an 11-month warranty walk-through. This com- mitment to all project stakeholders ensures realistic expectations within efficient work sequences. RJM’s assigned project manager will review all contracts for sched- uling needs and critical timelines. They will identify long lead-time items and criti- cal path milestones, ensure all are in alignment, and then prepare and issue master schedules. Once construction begins, they will offer analysis and variance reports. At RJM, we incorporate efficient, lean construction principles into the project ap- proach to gain efficiencies and monitor workforce needs, ultimately protecting the project schedule. 169 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 30 Project Approach PROJECT COMMUNICATION RJM will coordinate all project communications: scheduling, attending, participating in, and recording regular meetings. By leading this process, we can better monitor the project’s advancement while keeping important construction milestone dates in mind. Meeting minutes will be distributed to the project team within 48 hours, with team assignments clearly outlined. Additionally, RJM will provide regular updates for the team to share with their extended teams. RJM leverages Procore, a comprehensive project management platform, to ensure successful outcomes for all project stakeholders. Procore’s customizable suite of internal and external applications keeps all stakeholders informed of progress and enables convenient access to project data at all times. Our internal use of Procore’s tools includes tracking all communications and action plan checklists, ensuring all necessary project tasks are completed throughout the project’s lifecycle. Addition- ally, we have integrated quality and safety assessments into Procore, making it a cen- tralized repository for project information. Externally, all project-related documentation is available to necessary team mem- bers, including submittals, Requests for Information (RFI), approved changes, meet- ing minutes, schedules, updated plans and specifications, and correspondences be- tween parties. A submittal register is delivered, which tracks all items incorporated into the project and their lead times and assigns responsibility for reviews. The sub- mittal register also identifies items that may have long lead times, which could impact the schedule, allowing the team to prioritize items to reduce any on-site impacts. Procore’s RFI workflow process is a robust system that allows for submitting and tracking responses across the project lifecycle. Seamless integration extends to the change management tool, submittals, and drawings tools, ensuring precise tracking of all financial impacts associated with RFIs, submittals involving revisions to proposed or specified project elements, and updates to drawings throughout the construction phase. This interconnected approach within the Procore platform enhances efficien- cy, transparency, and accuracy in monitoring and managing the financial aspects of project changes. The drawings tool has an innovative feature that enables RFIs, photos, and field mark- ups to be seamlessly integrated directly into the public project drawing set. The set is maintained in the project document history and serves as reliable cloud storage for critical documents in the future. All meeting agendas, minutes, and supporting documents that are reviewed in week- ly construction meetings are issued and stored long-term in Procore for access by all stakeholders. Even throughout the closeout process, RJM utilizes Procore to track completion and punch lists, identify non-conforming work, and assign responsibility and deadlines for the completion of these items, ensuring all work is completed on time. EXPEDITING WORK OF SUBCONTRACTORS AND MATERIAL SUPPLIERS Maintaining strong and positive relationships with the subcontractor market protects the project’s integrity and keeps everyone working as a team. RJM has been proud to 170 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 31 Project Approach receive the Minnesota Subcontractors Association TOPS Award (Teamwork, Oppor- tunities, and Partnering with Subcontractors) for several years, emphasizing our firm but fair approach. By valuing and maintaining that strong relationship, RJM can solic- it quality partners to bid projects and push the envelope regarding delivery dates or expedited project schedules. RJM has been proud to receive the Minnesota Subcontractors Association TOPs Award (Teamwork, Opportunities, and Partnering with Subcontractors) for several consecutive years, emphasizing our firm but fair approach. COORDINATION OF TRADES AND SUPPORTING DISCIPLINES When working with subcontractors, our philosophy is to be firm but fair, respectful but demanding. The project’s success relies heavily on the success of the subcontrac- tors to complete their work in a quality manner by the schedule. We are committed to providing clear communication and building long-term partnerships with subcon- tractors, just as we are with our clients. CHANGE ORDER PROCESS RJM scrutinizes any change order requests before being presented to the client. We work with subcontractors in the field to develop options for resolution, often elimi- nating the proposed change request. Most changes are avoided by focusing on proac- tive project management and developing alternative solutions with the project team. Should the City of Chanhassen request enhancements to the project, RJM will work with the project team to clarify these requested changes and provide guidance on the most cost-effective way to complete the work. RISK MANAGEMENT Risk management is a crucial aspect to consider whether you are in the midst of a construction project or managing day-to-day business operations. At RJM, we prior- itize project risk management through proactive planning and meticulous attention to key areas. Our approach is designed to ensure that all clients receive the highest level of service, with a focus on the following: Subcontractor prequalification: We maintain a broad base of quality subcontractors and vendors and conduct a thorough review of their qualifications and resources. We select subcontractors based on an equitable combination of price, qualifications, and 171 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 32 Project Approach resources to ensure the success of your project. Quality: Building a project that stays true to your vision requires excellent quality control. We execute a formal review process of materials and installation details, us- ing virtual design and MEP systems expertise to identify and address issues before they become problems. Safety: At RJM, safety is one of our top priorities. We believe that safety, quality, and productivity are all interconnected. That’s why we have a comprehensive program to ensure that we prioritize safety on every project. Insurance: We understand that unforeseen challenges can arise during any project. That’s why we maintain a combination of insurance policies tailored to the needs of both the construction industry and our clients. Ongoing service and maintenance: Our service team provides routine service, pre- ventative maintenance, and everything in between to ensure that your building or space remains in top condition. This proactive approach to the health and quality of your environment helps minimize unforeseen challenges and safeguards your long- term investment. QUALITY CONTROL For the Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center Project, RJM Construction will devel- op a custom quality control plan. We rigorously monitor the quality of materials and installation procedures starting from the design phase. To enhance quality assurance, we recommend a third-party review for critical components. Our team includes a dedicated Director of Quality Control, who focuses on review- ing the project’s critical details and conducting pre-installation conferences with contractors to set quality expectations and best practices. During these meetings, we review approved submittals, analyze systems, and discuss critical work sequenc- ing. These proactive sessions effectively mitigate issues before they arise, ensuring smooth project progression. RJM’s comprehensive quality control process includes daily checklists and stringent contractor selection criteria, ensuring successful project delivery that meets or ex- ceeds client expectations. Led by our Director of Quality Control, Mike Johnson, our team ensures meticulous oversight of project details and adherence to specifications. Pre-installation conferences are pivotal, providing a platform to align expectations with contractors. We review approved submittals, assess mock-up systems, and me- ticulously plan work sequencing to preempt potential issues, ensuring seamless proj- ect execution. We implement comprehensive planning systems and regular executive check-ins to drive project success. This meticulous planning begins in the preconstruction phase, focusing on site logistics, defining work scopes, procuring long-lead materials, and collaborating closely with clients on Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (FFE) and move schedules. Throughout construction, we conduct detailed schedule reviews and task validations to maintain alignment with project requirements. Our systematic approach empha- sizes robust document control, ensuring all design and construction documents are 172 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 33 Project Approach current, accurate, and accessible to all stakeholders. We believe that our comprehensive quality control process, which includes pre-in- stallation conferences, daily checklists, and stringent contractor selection criteria, is essential to delivering a successful project that meets or exceeds our client’s expec- tations. SAFETY PROGRAM Safety is integral to our business. We believe that safety, quality, and productivity are interrelated, and we have adopted a comprehensive program to carry out that philosophy. Our policy is to provide required safety training for all employees, utilize high-performing safety equipment, and set clear expectations and standards for sub- contractors. RJM’s Director of Safety, Kale Fischer , provides leadership and oversight to the safety aspects of every project and will work closely with our project team to develop a site security plan that complies with all temporary egress, fire, and life safe- ty requirements. Our safety manual is segmented and accessible through QR codes posted on-site, providing instant access to information in the field. This approach en- sures that the content is readily available at all times and allows for real-time updates and improvements to our processes. Directives accompanying our toolbox talks are modified to communicate these changes promptly, fostering a dynamic and respon- sive safety communication system within our organization. Ensuring a safe working environment is our utmost priority on every project. Our su- perintendent diligently oversees daily operations, ensuring strict adherence to safe- ty protocols by all contractors. Maintaining an impeccable safety record, free from violations, is paramount to us. On this project, RJM would incorporate a secured site program to ensure employee access is restricted from the construction area and that persons unfamiliar with construction hazards are not exposed to potential threats. Within the construction site, RJM strictly enforces all OSHA requirements, includ- ing, but not limited to, PPE, Lock-out/Tag-out procedures, and temporary fire and life-safety measures. RJM Construction does NOT permit any work on live electri- cal systems. We require all hot work to be coordinated with building management and hot work permits to be obtained before any welding, brazing, or flammable work functions occur. Throughout construction, the RJM superintendent will make daily site safety assessments in conjunction with the project manager, who will complete weekly site safety assessments to ensure that all team members uphold the highest level of safety and security. PUNCH-LIST PROCESS AND CLOSE-OUT RJM efficiently completes punch lists, assembles warranty information, and prompt- ly collects contractual contractor closeout documents. Before the official punch-list with the project team, RJM performs a pre-punch list with our internal team to iden- tify, record, and complete any outstanding items. Additionally, RJM and the City’s project team will conduct a post-occupancy inspection approximately 11 months af- ter completion. FINANCIAL STANDING Please see Exhibit A for confirmation of Bonding Capacity RJM EMR .87 .74 .70 .54 RECENT SAFETY RECOGNITION & AWARDS LECET Safety Driven Contractor Award of Excellence: 2022, 2023, 2024 AGC CHASE Level 3 Projects: 2022, 2023, 2024. RJM has been a CHASE member since 2015, and have had at least 10 Level 3 projects in the last 3 years OSHA Stand Down to Falls: Recognition in 2022, 2023, 2024 Governors Bronze Safety Award: 2024 173 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 34 REFERENCES Consistently RJM demonstrates a high degree of professionalism in all phases of the construction process. RJM staff always provide the City with accurate, well thought out cost estimates, construction timelines and communication models. Alan Madsen City of Maple Grove “CLIENT REFERENCES Chuck Stifter City of Maple Grove 763-494-6000 Jim Dickinson (Former) City of Andover 763-324-4700 Dave Callister City of Plymouth 763-509-5301 Elise Durbin City of Chaska 952-448-9200 Jay Lotthamer (Former) City of Eden Prairie 763-458-9294 Cindy Walsh City of St.Louis Park 952-924-2541 174 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 35 FINANCIAL AND LEGAL STANDING KEY QUALIFICATIONS AND APPROACH LEGAL STANDING RJM has not had any litigation with any project owners or design firms. This is a reflection of RJM’s robust risk management programs and our ability to build relationships with clients by focusing on clear communication and positive outcomes. On rare occasions when conflict has arisen with a client, RJM has avoided litigation through di- rect executive-level negotiations or mediated settlement discussions. RJM’s standard form contract requires that both good faith direct negotiations and mediated settlement discussions take place before litigation is commenced in court or arbitration. 175 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 36 EXHIBIT A Surety Letter 176 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 37 Markel Surety 222 South Riverside Plaza, Suite 2400, Chicago, IL 60606 www.markelsurety.com March 21, 2025 Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd, PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: RJM Construction, LLC – Bonding Capacity Project: Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center Estimated Contract Value: $80,000,000 Dear Ms. Hokkanen: It is our understanding that RJM Construction, LLC, has indicated that certain information on their surety relationship is required as part of your contractor prequalification process. Markel Insurance Company has provided surety credit to RJM Construction, LLC for single projects of $100,000,000 and an aggregate uncompleted backlog of $200,000,000. RJM Construction, LLC currently has sufficient surety bonding capacity to obtain performance and payment bonds for 100% of the value of this project. Markel Insurance Company is rated A (Excellent) with a financial size of XV ($2 Billion or greater) by A.M. Best. Markel Insurance Company is listed on the U.S. Treasury Department’s Listing of Approved Sureties (Department Circular 570) and is authorized to transact business in all 50 states. If RJM Construction, LLC is awarded a contract for the referenced project and requests that we provide the necessary performance and payment bonding, we will be prepared to execute the bonds in 100 percent of the contract value subject to our acceptable review of the contract terms and conditions, bond forms, appropriate contract funding and any other underwriting considerations at the time of the request. Our consideration and issuance of bonds is a matter solely between RJM Construction, LLC and Markel Insurance Company and we assume no liability to third parties or to you by the issuance of this letter. We trust that this information meets with your satisfaction. If there are further questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Markel Insurance Company Kelly Nicole Enghauser Attorney-in-Fact P: 763.302.7197 E: kelly.enghauser@wtwco.com 177 City of Chanhassen RFQ - Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 38 îíïðððç Þ´¿µ»Íò Þ±¸´·¹ô Ó·½¸»´´»Ø¿´¬»®ô Ø»¿¬¸»®Îò Ù±»¼¬»´ô Ò·½±´»Ô¿²¹»®ô Õ»´´§Ò·½±´»Û²¹¸¿«»®ô Ø¿´»§Ðº´«¹ 2310009 îï¬ îï¬ ß«¹«¬ ß«¹«¬îðîì îðîì 178 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK CITY OF CHANHASSEN CHANHASSEN BLUFFS CO MMUNITY CENTER PROJECT April 11, 2025 179 1 P ROJECT OVERVIEW GENERAL INFORMATION The City of Chanhassen (“City”) is seeking proposals via this Request for Proposal (“RFP”) for a Construction Manager at Risk (“CMAR") with a Guaranteed Maximum Price (“GMP”) from qualified short-listed firms selected via a previous qualification’s submittal for construction of the proposed Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center. The selected firm will work with our Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center Project Team, which will be comprised of City staff and stakeholders, BKV Group, and the Sports Facilities Companies, providing programming and preliminary design, concept design, schematic design, design development, construction documents, and construction administration services for the proposed project. The City intends to use a CMAR contract with GMP. The CMAR will provide preconstruction and construction services, including cost and schedule estimating, bidding to subcontractors, and day-to-day construction management. The City and selected contractor shall comply with all requirements of Minnesota State Statute 471.463. QUESTIONS/INQUIRES Questions regarding the process, interpretations, or requirements of this RFP will be answered as they are received (as soon as practical) and can be directed via email to: Laurie Hokkanen – lhokkanen@chanhassenmn.gov Jerry Ruegemer – jruegemer@chanhassenmn.gov Charlie Howley – chowley@chanhassenmn.gov CITY BUDGET AND PROJ ECT GOALS The Community Center investment plan provides for approximately $79.7 million in overall project cost. The city will primarily fund the project using a voter-approved one-half percent (0.5%) local option sales tax increase and property tax levy. The total project budget contemplates $60-$62 million in construction costs. The city is acquiring ~13 acres of land from Level 7 development. $7 million of that acquisition is a project cost, and $2.1 million is being contributed from other sources. The city requires the project to be complete in time to host high school graduation ceremonies in June 2028. SCOPE OF SERVICES This RFP is a subsequent step to the Request For Qualifications (“RFQ”) published on March 13, 2025. All information from the RFQ submission shall be a component of this RFP. The City intends to enter into an open book Cost of Work plus fee with a Guaranteed Maximum Price contractual agreement with the selected CMAR through GMP. The contract will be negotiated for the construction work required but the City will retain the option to select a different CMAR after completion of the preconstruction services or if the City and the selected CMAR cannot agree on a GMP. 180 2 The City intends to use the AIA Document A133-2019 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager at Risk. The City reserves the right to deny modifications to the standard forms of agreement proposed by the CMAR. Please refer to the previous RFQ for the full scope of services. RFP SCHEDULE RFP Responses Due by April 18, 2025 at 8AM Interviews Monday, April 21, 2025 Selection of CMAR Week of April 21, 2025 Council Contract Approval Tentative May 12, 2025 Start of Services May 2025 SUBMISSION REQUIREME NTS Your proposal should include all items indicated under the proposal requirements. Electronic submission only, please. Chanhassen City Hall 7700 Market Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 (Business Hours 8:00-4:30) Electronic Copies to: Laurie Hokkanen – lhokkanen@chanhassenmn.gov Jerry Ruegemer – jruegemer@chanhassenmn.gov Charlie Howley – chowley@chanhassenmn.gov PROPOSAL REQUIREMENT S Review the contract A133 and associated A201 and provide comments. CMAR Fee and GC Worksheet and Questionnaire EVALUATION CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES SELECTION TEAM A city-selected evaluation panel will rate prospective CMAR firms for this work using only objective criteria based on the information obtained from written proposals submitted in responses to the RFQ, this RFP, including the fee spreadsheet and questionnaire, and subsequent interviews. The panel includes a minimum of five city staff from Public Works/Engineering, Parks and Recreation, and Administration. The panel also includes representatives from BKV Group, the project architect. The City of Chanhassen will conduct interviews in person at Chanhassen City Hall on Monday, April 21, 2025, between 9 a.m. and 1 p.m. Each firm invited to respond to the RFP will be interviewed. SELECTION PROCEDURE The evaluation will consist of a matrix of requirements, qualifications, and experience. The following 181 3 criteria will be used in evaluating the submittals received in response to this RFP: Required Component Weight RFQ Response – Qualifications The score from RFQ will carry forward Firm Experience & Qualifications (20%) Project Team & Key Personnel (30%) Project Approach & Understanding (40%) Quality & Thoroughness of Submission (10%) 50% Fee Spreadsheet and Questionnaire Provide rates as indicated in the spreadsheet provided and written responses to the questionnaire. 30% Interviews Interviews will be held in person at Chanhassen City Hall. Interviews will be 60 minutes allowing for 30 minutes of presentation and 30 minutes for questions and answers. 20% CONDITIONS OF REQUES T AND REQUIREMENTS THE FOLLOWING CONDIT IONS APPLY TO THIS R F P : Consideration of a prospective firm’s proposal will be made only if the prospective firm meets all the minimum requirements of this RFP. The City reserves the right to adjust, increase, limit, suspend or rescind the rating based on subsequently learned information. The City reserves the right to award a contract to the firm (or firms) that present the best proposal, and which will best accomplish the desired results for the City. The City reserves the right to withdraw this solicitation for proposals at any time without prior notice. Further, the city makes no representations that any agreement will be awarded to any firm submitting a proposal. The RFP is not a contract and does not in any way bind the City to any obligations. Incomplete, inaccurate, or late proposals shall be eliminated from further consideration. All questions regarding this solicitation should be directed to the city representatives listed in this RFP. Do not attempt to contact other City staff members regarding your submittal or any related submittal. Any changes to the proposal requirements will be issued by addendum. In any event, the City shall not be liable for any pre-contractual expenses incurred by any submission or firm. This shall include pre-contractual expenses such as preparing the Proposal, submitting the Proposal to the City, negotiating with the City on any matter related to the Proposal, or other expenses incurred prior to the date of award for any agreement related to the services herein described. No prior, current, or post-award verbal agreement(s) with any officer, agent, or employees of the City shall affect or modify any terms or modifications of this RFP or any contract or option resulting from this process. The City reserves the right to waive any minor irregularities, informalities, or oversights at its sole discretion. The term “minor” as used herein means any proposer or City irregularities or oversights that does not materially affect or alter the intent and purpose of this RF P and is not in violation of any State of Minnesota or Federal Government rules, laws and regulations that may apply to this procurement. Upon submission, all proposals become the property of the City, which retains the right to use any concept or idea presented in any proposals submitted. Proposers are held legally responsible for their proposals. 182 830 Boone Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 952-837-8600 RJMConstruction.com April 18, 2025 Laurie Hokkanen City Manager lhokkanen@chanhassenmn.gov 952-227-1119 RE: Construction Management At Risk (CMAR) Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center Dear Laurie, Thank you for the opportunity to present RJM Construction, LLC as your trusted partner for Construction Management services on the Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center project. We are excited to collaborate with your team and BKV Group to bring this transformative vision to life, creating a lasting legacy for the Chanhassen community. At RJM, we pride ourselves on our extensive expertise in municipal construction management and innovative problem- solving capabilities. With successful partnerships involving over 50 municipalities and pioneering initiatives like the “hybrid” CMAR delivery model, we have honed the skills necessary to exceed expectations on projects of this scope and significance. Our leadership team, deeply rooted in Chanhassen, brings a unique connection and sense of pride that will ensure this project reflects the community’s vision and aspirations. Enclosed, you will find RJM’s CMAR Fee and General Conditions worksheet, along with our completed questionnaire and draft AIA A133 and A201 contracts for your review. We are fully prepared to contribute our creativity, expertise, and dedication to this important undertaking. We look forward to discussing our proposal in detail and meeting with your team on Monday, April 21st. Should you have any questions or require additional information in the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact me at 952-837-8614. Sincerely, Brad Barickman | Vice President Community | 952-837-8614 | brad.barickman@rjmconstruction.com 183 Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center April 11, 2025 RFP for Construction Manager at Risk Services Construction Manager at Risk Fee Comments Conceptual Planning. CMAR Fee as a fixed amount. (Approx. 1 month duration)$0 1 month, 1 estimate Pre-Construction Services during Schematic Design and Design Development including establishing a GMP. CMAR Fee as a fixed amount. (Approx. 5 month duration) $20,000 5 months, 3 estimates, and GMP Construction Phase Services during Construction Documents and Construction. CMAR Fee, as a Percentage of Cost of the Work (percentage will be converted to fixed fee at time of GMP). Note that multiple bid packages are anticipated. 1.50% CM profit and overhead only $900,000 On a separate attachment, define what is included in CMAR Fee , as opposed to an assumed Cost of Work CMAR Management Staff General Conditions for Option 1 Insurance / Others Comments Full insurance package expressed in dollars per $1,000 of construction costs (Include type and limits of coverage and deductibles), excluding Builder's Risk Insurance. $ 8.90/$1,000 $534,000 Builder’s Risk Coverage expressed in dollars per $1,000 of construction costs (Include type and limits of coverage and deductibles).$ 2.50/$1,000 $150,000 State whether CMAR intends to enroll subcontractors in subcontractor default insurance program and if so the cost of that program (stated as a percentage of the values of the subcontract enrolled). %Open to discussing pros/cons with city and determining if a good fit for this project **Performance Bond, As a Percentage of Cost of the Work % 0.58 $345,595 Small Tools, As a Percentage of General Condition's Field Labor % 1.50 % of general conditions labor Construction Manager At-Risk, Fee and General Conditions Worksheet/Questionnaire On a separate attachment provide unit prices for all Management Staff and associated general condition items beginning at the time of the GMP through project completion. Include home office staff and on-site management, including but not limited to, benefits, cell phone, trucks, and mileage. Do not include project general requirements such as utilities, dumpsters, temporary toilets, safety equipment, hoisting, snow removal, periodic and final clean, etc. as they are intended to be reimbursed as a cost of work item. Identify proposed annual increases for project duration. ** Dual oblige alternate option - if accepted will save the City of Chanhassen approximately $300,000 in bond costs, option currently being utilized by RJM with the City of Maple Grove, City of Northfield, and City of Fridley. Open to discussing further with the City of Chanhassen. 1 of 2 184 Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center April 11, 2025 RFP for Construction Manager at Risk Services Construction Manager At-Risk, Fee and General Conditions Worksheet/Questionnaire On a separate attachment, please comment on the following: 1. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Willingness to forgo CMAR fee on change orders within 5% of GMP. CONFIRMED Acknowledgement that your firm is willing to return buyout savings, reduce construction contingency incrementally during construction rather than at end of project. CONFIRMED Confirmation that your firm will only seek increases in the general conditions and general requirements cost NTEs in connection with change order time extension and/or material increase in scope of the work which requires additional general conditions and general requirements costs as established by CMAR. CONFIRMED Recommended inflation factor to be included within GMP. 2-3% Recommended CMAR Contingency by Design Phase (% of construction cost). SD 8%, DD 6%, PROGRESS CD 4%, GMP 4% Equipment rental rate schedules (owned & 3rd party rentals). Willingness to cap rental costs at no more than purchase price. Willingness to discount from AED rates? SEE ATTACHED Confirmation that your firm will have an open bid/open book policy with the City on all aspects of the project including providing subcontractor buy- out costs vs. line item estimates carried in the GMP. CONFIRMED 2 of 2 185 City of Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center RJM Construction - Construction Manager Fee Proposal April 18, 2025 Preconstruction & Bidding Phase 6 Months Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Project Executive 130 HRS 200.00$ 26,000$ Project Manager 52 HRS 145.00$ 7,540$ Estimator/Sr. Estimator 312 HRS 150.00$ 46,800$ MEP & Sustainability Coordinator 104 HRS 180.00$ 18,720$ Virtual Design 26 HRS 140.00$ 3,640$ Document Quality Control Team 26 HRS 135.45$ 3,522$ Subtotal Preconstruction & Bidding 106,222$ Discounted Pre-Construction Fee 20,000$ Project Reimbursable Expenses 18 Months Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Project Executive 912 HRS 200.00$ included in fee Project Manager 2318 HRS 145.00$ 336,110$ Project Engineer 1543 HRS 115.00$ 177,422$ General Superintendent 152 HRS 155.00$ 23,560$ Superintendent 2888 HRS 140.00$ 404,320$ MEP & Sustainability Coordinator 456 HRS 180.00$ included in fee Safety Director 304 HRS 155.00$ included in fee Project Coordinator 152 HRS 85.00$ 12,920$ Project Accountant 228 HRS 77.00$ included in fee Trucking/Deliveries 152 HRS 98.00$ 14,896$ Truck 3496 HRS 4.50$ 15,732$ Fuel 76 WK 85.00$ 6,460$ Subtotal Reimbursable Expenses 991,420$ 186 General Conditions Costs 18 Months Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Project Technology 76 WK 400.00$ 30,400$ Cell Phone 76 WK 50.00$ 3,800$ Blue Prints 18 MO 50.00$ 878$ Postage & Delivery 18 MO 50.00$ 878$ Office Equipment 18 MO 350.00$ 6,143$ Site Trailer 18 MO 950.00$ 16,674$ Subtotal General Conditions 58,773$ General Liability Insurance General Liability Insurance 1 LS 0.89%534,000$ Builder's Risk Insurance Builder's Risk Insurance 1 LS 0.25%150,000$ Payment/Performance Bond (1-Year Warranty) Payment/Performance Bond 1 LS 0.58%345,595$ Construction Management Fee Proposed Construction Manager Fee 1 LS 1.50%900,000$ CM Fee Based on a Project Value of:60,000,000$ Total Cost of Services 2,999,787$ * The staffing and hours outlined above are an estimate of anticipated services for the noted duration. Once an agreed upon schedule is finalized, the hours may adjust up or down accordingly. 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 AIA® Document A201TM – 2017 General Conditions of the Contract for Construction AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 1 236480v1 ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS: The author of this document has added information needed for its completion. The author may also have revised the text of the original AIA standard form. An Additions and Deletions Report that notes added information as well as revisions to the standard form text is available from the author and should be reviewed. This document has important legal consequences. Consultation with an attorney is encouraged with respect to its completion or modification. For guidance in modifying this document to include supplementary conditions, see AIA Document A503™, Guide for Supplementary Conditions. ELECTRONIC COPYING of any portion of this AIA® Document to another electronic file is prohibited and constitutes a violation of copyright laws as set forth in the footer of this document. for the following PROJECT: (Name and location or address) «Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center » «Hwy 212 & Powers Blvd » « Chanhassen, MN 55317» « » THE OWNER: (Name, legal status and address) «City of Chanhassen » «7700 Market Blvd » «PO Box 147 » «Chanhassen, MN 55317 » THE ARCHITECT: (Name, legal status and address) «BKV Group » «2222 North Second Street » «Long & Kees Bldg, Suite 101 » «Minneapolis, MN 55401 » « » TABLE OF ARTICLES 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 2 OWNER 3 CONTRACTOR 4 ARCHITECT 5 SUBCONTRACTORS 6 CONSTRUCTION BY OWNER OR BY SEPARATE CONTRACTORS 7 CHANGES IN THE WORK 8 TIME 9 PAYMENTS AND COMPLETION 10 PROTECTION OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY 11 INSURANCE AND BONDS 196 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 2 236480v1 12 UNCOVERING AND CORRECTION OF WORK 13 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 14 TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF THE CONTRACT 15 CLAIMS AND DISPUTES 197 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 3 236480v1 INDEX (Topics and numbers in bold are Section headings.) Acceptance of Nonconforming Work 9.6.6, 9.9.3, 12.3 Acceptance of Work 9.6.6, 9.8.2, 9.9.3, 9.10.1, 9.10.3, 12.3 Access to Work 3.16, 6.2.1, 12.1 Accident Prevention 10 Acts and Omissions 3.2, 3.3.2, 3.12.8, 3.18, 4.2.3, 8.3.1, 9.5.1, 10.2.5, 10.2.8, 13.3.2, 14.1, 15.1.2, 15.2 Addenda 1.1.1 Additional Costs, Claims for 3.7.4, 3.7.5, 10.3.2, 15.1.5 Additional Inspections and Testing 9.4.2, 9.8.3, 12.2.1, 13.4 Additional Time, Claims for 3.2.4, 3.7.4, 3.7.5, 3.10.2, 8.3.2, 15.1.6 Administration of the Contract 3.1.3, 4.2, 9.4, 9.5 Advertisement or Invitation to Bid 1.1.1 Aesthetic Effect 4.2.13 Allowances 3.8 Applications for Payment 4.2.5, 7.3.9, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5.1, 9.5.4, 9.6.3, 9.7, 9.10 Approvals 2.1.1, 2.3.1, 2.5, 3.1.3, 3.10.2, 3.12.8, 3.12.9, 3.12.10.1, 4.2.7, 9.3.2, 13.4.1 Arbitration 8.3.1, 15.3.2, 15.4 ARCHITECT 4 Architect, Definition of 4.1.1 Architect, Extent of Authority 2.5, 3.12.7, 4.1.2, 4.2, 5.2, 6.3, 7.1.2, 7.3.4, 7.4, 9.2, 9.3.1, 9.4, 9.5, 9.6.3, 9.8, 9.10.1, 9.10.3, 12.1, 12.2.1, 13.4.1, 13.4.2, 14.2.2, 14.2.4, 15.1.4, 15.2.1 Architect, Limitations of Authority and Responsibility 2.1.1, 3.12.4, 3.12.8, 3.12.10, 4.1.2, 4.2.1, 4.2.2, 4.2.3, 4.2.6, 4.2.7, 4.2.10, 4.2.12, 4.2.13, 5.2.1, 7.4, 9.4.2, 9.5.4, 9.6.4, 15.1.4, 15.2 Architect’s Additional Services and Expenses 2.5, 12.2.1, 13.4.2, 13.4.3, 14.2.4 Architect’s Administration of the Contract 3.1.3, 3.7.4, 15.2, 9.4.1, 9.5 Architect’s Approvals 2.5, 3.1.3, 3.5, 3.10.2, 4.2.7 Architect’s Authority to Reject Work 3.5, 4.2.6, 12.1.2, 12.2.1 Architect’s Copyright 1.1.7, 1.5 Architect’s Decisions 3.7.4, 4.2.6, 4.2.7, 4.2.11, 4.2.12, 4.2.13, 4.2.14, 6.3, 7.3.4, 7.3.9, 8.1.3, 8.3.1, 9.2, 9.4.1, 9.5, 9.8.4, 9.9.1, 13.4.2, 15.2 Architect’s Inspections 3.7.4, 4.2.2, 4.2.9, 9.4.2, 9.8.3, 9.9.2, 9.10.1, 13.4 Architect’s Instructions 3.2.4, 3.3.1, 4.2.6, 4.2.7, 13.4.2 Architect’s Interpretations 4.2.11, 4.2.12 Architect’s Project Representative 4.2.10 Architect’s Relationship with Contractor 1.1.2, 1.5, 2.3.3, 3.1.3, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.3.1, 3.4.2, 3.5, 3.7.4, 3.7.5, 3.9.2, 3.9.3, 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, 3.16, 3.18, 4.1.2, 4.2, 5.2, 6.2.2, 7, 8.3.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 9.7, 9.8, 9.9, 10.2.6, 10.3, 11.3, 12, 13.3.2, 13.4, 15.2 Architect’s Relationship with Subcontractors 1.1.2, 4.2.3, 4.2.4, 4.2.6, 9.6.3, 9.6.4, 11.3 Architect’s Representations 9.4.2, 9.5.1, 9.10.1 Architect’s Site Visits 3.7.4, 4.2.2, 4.2.9, 9.4.2, 9.5.1, 9.9.2, 9.10.1, 13.4 Asbestos 10.3.1 Attorneys’ Fees 3.18.1, 9.6.8, 9.10.2, 10.3.3 Award of Separate Contracts 6.1.1, 6.1.2 Award of Subcontracts and Other Contracts for Portions of the Work 5.2 Basic Definitions 1.1 Bidding Requirements 1.1.1 Binding Dispute Resolution 8.3.1, 9.7, 11.5, 13.1, 15.1.2, 15.1.3, 15.2.1, 15.2.5, 15.2.6.1, 15.3.1, 15.3.2, 15.3.3, 15.4.1 Bonds, Lien 7.3.4.4, 9.6.8, 9.10.2, 9.10.3 Bonds, Performance, and Payment 7.3.4.4, 9.6.7, 9.10.3, 11.1.2, 11.1.3, 11.5 Building Information Models Use and Reliance 1.8 Building Permit 3.7.1 Capitalization 1.3 198 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 4 236480v1 Certificate of Substantial Completion 9.8.3, 9.8.4, 9.8.5 Certificates for Payment 4.2.1, 4.2.5, 4.2.9, 9.3.3, 9.4, 9.5, 9.6.1, 9.6.6, 9.7, 9.10.1, 9.10.3, 14.1.1.3, 14.2.4, 15.1.4 Certificates of Inspection, Testing or Approval 13.4.4 Certificates of Insurance 9.10.2 Change Orders 1.1.1, 3.4.2, 3.7.4, 3.8.2.3, 3.11, 3.12.8, 4.2.8, 5.2.3, 7.1.2, 7.1.3, 7.2, 7.3.2, 7.3.7, 7.3.9, 7.3.10, 8.3.1, 9.3.1.1, 9.10.3, 10.3.2, 11.2, 11.5, 12.1.2 Change Orders, Definition of 7.2.1 CHANGES IN THE WORK 2.2.2, 3.11, 4.2.8, 7, 7.2.1, 7.3.1, 7.4, 8.3.1, 9.3.1.1, 11.5 Claims, Definition of 15.1.1 Claims, Notice of 1.6.2, 15.1.3 CLAIMS AND DISPUTES 3.2.4, 6.1.1, 6.3, 7.3.9, 9.3.3, 9.10.4, 10.3.3, 15, 15.4 Claims and Timely Assertion of Claims 15.4.1 Claims for Additional Cost 3.2.4, 3.3.1, 3.7.4, 7.3.9, 9.5.2, 10.2.5, 10.3.2, 15.1.5 Claims for Additional Time 3.2.4, 3.3.1, 3.7.4, 6.1.1, 8.3.2, 9.5.2, 10.3.2, 15.1.6 Concealed or Unknown Conditions, Claims for 3.7.4 Claims for Damages 3.2.4, 3.18, 8.3.3, 9.5.1, 9.6.7, 10.2.5, 10.3.3, 11.3, 11.3.2, 14.2.4, 15.1.7 Claims Subject to Arbitration 15.4.1 Cleaning Up 3.15, 6.3 Commencement of the Work, Conditions Relating to 2.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.4.1, 3.7.1, 3.10.1, 3.12.6, 5.2.1, 5.2.3, 6.2.2, 8.1.2, 8.2.2, 8.3.1, 11.1, 11.2, 15.1.5 Commencement of the Work, Definition of 8.1.2 Communications 3.9.1, 4.2.4 Completion, Conditions Relating to 3.4.1, 3.11, 3.15, 4.2.2, 4.2.9, 8.2, 9.4.2, 9.8, 9.9.1, 9.10, 12.2, 14.1.2, 15.1.2 COMPLETION, PAYMENTS AND 9 Completion, Substantial 3.10.1, 4.2.9, 8.1.1, 8.1.3, 8.2.3, 9.4.2, 9.8, 9.9.1, 9.10.3, 12.2, 15.1.2 Compliance with Laws 2.3.2, 3.2.3, 3.6, 3.7, 3.12.10, 3.13, 9.6.4, 10.2.2, 13.1, 13.3, 13.4.1, 13.4.2, 13.5, 14.1.1, 14.2.1.3, 15.2.8, 15.4.2, 15.4.3 Concealed or Unknown Conditions 3.7.4, 4.2.8, 8.3.1, 10.3 Conditions of the Contract 1.1.1, 6.1.1, 6.1.4 Consent, Written 3.4.2, 3.14.2, 4.1.2, 9.8.5, 9.9.1, 9.10.2, 9.10.3, 13.2, 15.4.4.2 Consolidation or Joinder 15.4.4 CONSTRUCTION BY OWNER OR BY SEPARATE CONTRACTORS 1.1.4, 6 Construction Change Directive, Definition of 7.3.1 Construction Change Directives 1.1.1, 3.4.2, 3.11, 3.12.8, 4.2.8, 7.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.1.3, 7.3, 9.3.1.1 Construction Schedules, Contractor’s 3.10, 3.11, 3.12.1, 3.12.2, 6.1.3, 15.1.6.2 Contingent Assignment of Subcontracts 5.4, 14.2.2.2 Continuing Contract Performance 15.1.4 Contract, Definition of 1.1.2 CONTRACT, TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF THE 5.4.1.1, 5.4.2, 11.5, 14 Contract Administration 3.1.3, 4, 9.4, 9.5 Contract Award and Execution, Conditions Relating to 3.7.1, 3.10, 5.2, 6.1 Contract Documents, Copies Furnished and Use of 1.5.2, 2.3.6, 5.3 Contract Documents, Definition of 1.1.1 Contract Sum 2.2.2, 2.2.4, 3.7.4, 3.7.5, 3.8, 3.10.2, 5.2.3, 7.3, 7.4, 9.1, 9.2, 9.4.2, 9.5.1.4, 9.6.7, 9.7, 10.3.2, 11.5, 12.1.2, 12.3, 14.2.4, 14.3.2, 15.1.4.2, 15.1.5, 15.2.5 Contract Sum, Definition of 9.1 Contract Time 1.1.4, 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 3.7.4, 3.7.5, 3.10.2, 5.2.3, 6.1.5, 7.2.1.3, 7.3.1, 7.3.5, 7.3.6, 7, 7, 7.3.10, 7.4, 8.1.1, 8.2.1, 8.2.3, 8.3.1, 9.5.1, 9.7, 10.3.2, 12.1.1, 12.1.2, 14.3.2, 15.1.4.2, 15.1.6.1, 15.2.5 Contract Time, Definition of 8.1.1 199 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 5 236480v1 CONTRACTOR 3 Contractor, Definition of 3.1, 6.1.2 Contractor’s Construction and Submittal Schedules 3.10, 3.12.1, 3.12.2, 4.2.3, 6.1.3, 15.1.6.2 Contractor’s Employees 2.2.4, 3.3.2, 3.4.3, 3.8.1, 3.9, 3.18.2, 4.2.3, 4.2.6, 10.2, 10.3, 11.3, 14.1, 14.2.1.1 Contractor’s Liability Insurance 11.1 Contractor’s Relationship with Separate Contractors and Owner’s Forces 3.12.5, 3.14.2, 4.2.4, 6, 11.3, 12.2.4 Contractor’s Relationship with Subcontractors 1.2.2, 2.2.4, 3.3.2, 3.18.1, 3.18.2, 4.2.4, 5, 9.6.2, 9.6.7, 9.10.2, 11.2, 11.3, 11.4 Contractor’s Relationship with the Architect 1.1.2, 1.5, 2.3.3, 3.1.3, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.3.1, 3.4.2, 3.5.1, 3.7.4, 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, 3.16, 3.18, 4.2, 5.2, 6.2.2, 7, 8.3.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 9.7, 9.8, 9.9, 10.2.6, 10.3, 11.3, 12, 13.4, 15.1.3, 15.2.1 Contractor’s Representations 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.5, 3.12.6, 6.2.2, 8.2.1, 9.3.3, 9.8.2 Contractor’s Responsibility for Those Performing the Work 3.3.2, 3.18, 5.3, 6.1.3, 6.2, 9.5.1, 10.2.8 Contractor’s Review of Contract Documents 3.2 Contractor’s Right to Stop the Work 2.2.2, 9.7 Contractor’s Right to Terminate the Contract 14.1 Contractor’s Submittals 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, 4.2.7, 5.2.1, 5.2.3, 9.2, 9.3, 9.8.2, 9.8.3, 9.9.1, 9.10.2, 9.10.3 Contractor’s Superintendent 3.9, 10.2.6 Contractor’s Supervision and Construction Procedures 1.2.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.12.10, 4.2.2, 4.2.7, 6.1.3, 6.2.4, 7.1.3, 7.3.4, 7.3.6, 8.2, 10, 12, 14, 15.1.4 Coordination and Correlation 1.2, 3.2.1, 3.3.1, 3.10, 3.12.6, 6.1.3, 6.2.1 Copies Furnished of Drawings and Specifications 1.5, 2.3.6, 3.11 Copyrights 1.5, 3.17 Correction of Work 2.5, 3.7.3, 9.4.2, 9.8.2, 9.8.3, 9.9.1, 12.1.2, 12.2, 12.3, 15.1.3.1, 15.1.3.2, 15.2.1 Correlation and Intent of the Contract Documents 1.2 Cost, Definition of 7.3.4 Costs 2.5, 3.2.4, 3.7.3, 3.8.2, 3.15.2, 5.4.2, 6.1.1, 6.2.3, 7.3.3.3, 7.3.4, 7.3.8, 7.3.9, 9.10.2, 10.3.2, 10.3.6, 11.2, 12.1.2, 12.2.1, 12.2.4, 13.4, 14 Cutting and Patching 3.14, 6.2.5 Damage to Construction of Owner or Separate Contractors 3.14.2, 6.2.4, 10.2.1.2, 10.2.5, 10.4, 12.2.4 Damage to the Work 3.14.2, 9.9.1, 10.2.1.2, 10.2.5, 10.4, 12.2.4 Damages, Claims for 3.2.4, 3.18, 6.1.1, 8.3.3, 9.5.1, 9.6.7, 10.3.3, 11.3.2, 11.3, 14.2.4, 15.1.7 Damages for Delay 6.2.3, 8.3.3, 9.5.1.6, 9.7, 10.3.2, 14.3.2 Date of Commencement of the Work, Definition of 8.1.2 Date of Substantial Completion, Definition of 8.1.3 Day, Definition of 8.1.4 Decisions of the Architect 3.7.4, 4.2.6, 4.2.7, 4.2.11, 4.2.12, 4.2.13, 6.3, 7.3.4, 7.3.9, 8.1.3, 8.3.1, 9.2, 9.4, 9.5.1, 9.8.4, 9.9.1, 13.4.2, 14.2.2, 14.2.4, 15.1, 15.2 Decisions to Withhold Certification 9.4.1, 9.5, 9.7, 14.1.1.3 Defective or Nonconforming Work, Acceptance, Rejection and Correction of 2.5, 3.5, 4.2.6, 6.2.3, 9.5.1, 9.5.3, 9.6.6, 9.8.2, 9.9.3, 9.10.4, 12.2.1 Definitions 1.1, 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 3.5, 3.12.1, 3.12.2, 3.12.3, 4.1.1, 5.1, 6.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.3.1, 8.1, 9.1, 9.8.1, 15.1.1 Delays and Extensions of Time 3.2, 3.7.4, 5.2.3, 7.2.1, 7.3.1, 7.4, 8.3, 9.5.1, 9.7, 10.3.2, 10.4, 14.3.2, 15.1.6, 15.2.5 Digital Data Use and Transmission 1.7 Disputes 6.3, 7.3.9, 15.1, 15.2 Documents and Samples at the Site 3.11 Drawings, Definition of 1.1.5 Drawings and Specifications, Use and Ownership of 3.11 Effective Date of Insurance 8.2.2 Emergencies 10.4, 14.1.1.2, 15.1.5 200 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 6 236480v1 Employees, Contractor’s 3.3.2, 3.4.3, 3.8.1, 3.9, 3.18.2, 4.2.3, 4.2.6, 10.2, 10.3.3, 11.3, 14.1, 14.2.1.1 Equipment, Labor, or Materials 1.1.3, 1.1.6, 3.4, 3.5, 3.8.2, 3.8.3, 3.12, 3.13, 3.15.1, 4.2.6, 4.2.7, 5.2.1, 6.2.1, 7.3.4, 9.3.2, 9.3.3, 9.5.1.3, 9.10.2, 10.2.1, 10.2.4, 14.2.1.1, 14.2.1.2 Execution and Progress of the Work 1.1.3, 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 2.3.4, 2.3.6, 3.1, 3.3.1, 3.4.1, 3.7.1, 3.10.1, 3.12, 3.14, 4.2, 6.2.2, 7.1.3, 7.3.6, 8.2, 9.5.1, 9.9.1, 10.2, 10.3, 12.1, 12.2, 14.2, 14.3.1, 15.1.4 Extensions of Time 3.2.4, 3.7.4, 5.2.3, 7.2.1, 7.3, 7.4, 9.5.1, 9.7, 10.3.2, 10.4, 14.3, 15.1.6, 15.2.5 Failure of Payment 9.5.1.3, 9.7, 9.10.2, 13.5, 14.1.1.3, 14.2.1.2 Faulty Work (See Defective or Nonconforming Work) Final Completion and Final Payment 4.2.1, 4.2.9, 9.8.2, 9.10, 12.3, 14.2.4, 14.4.3 Financial Arrangements, Owner’s 2.2.1, 13.2.2, 14.1.1.4 GENERAL PROVISIONS 1 Governing Law 13.1 Guarantees (See Warranty) Hazardous Materials and Substances 10.2.4, 10.3 Identification of Subcontractors and Suppliers 5.2.1 Indemnification 3.17, 3.18, 9.6.8, 9.10.2, 10.3.3, 11.3 Information and Services Required of the Owner 2.1.2, 2.2, 2.3, 3.2.2, 3.12.10.1, 6.1.3, 6.1.4, 6.2.5, 9.6.1, 9.9.2, 9.10.3, 10.3.3, 11.2, 13.4.1, 13.4.2, 14.1.1.4, 14.1.4, 15.1.4 Initial Decision 15.2 Initial Decision Maker, Definition of 1.1.8 Initial Decision Maker, Decisions 14.2.4, 15.1.4.2, 15.2.1, 15.2.2, 15.2.3, 15.2.4, 15.2.5 Initial Decision Maker, Extent of Authority 14.2.4, 15.1.4.2, 15.2.1, 15.2.2, 15.2.3, 15.2.4, 15.2.5 Injury or Damage to Person or Property 10.2.8, 10.4 Inspections 3.1.3, 3.3.3, 3.7.1, 4.2.2, 4.2.6, 4.2.9, 9.4.2, 9.8.3, 9.9.2, 9.10.1, 12.2.1, 13.4 Instructions to Bidders 1.1.1 Instructions to the Contractor 3.2.4, 3.3.1, 3.8.1, 5.2.1, 7, 8.2.2, 12, 13.4.2 Instruments of Service, Definition of 1.1.7 Insurance 6.1.1, 7.3.4, 8.2.2, 9.3.2, 9.8.4, 9.9.1, 9.10.2, 10.2.5, 11 Insurance, Notice of Cancellation or Expiration 11.1.4, 11.2.3 Insurance, Contractor’s Liability 11.1 Insurance, Effective Date of 8.2.2, 14.4.2 Insurance, Owner’s Liability 11.2 Insurance, Property 10.2.5, 11.2, 11.4, 11.5 Insurance, Stored Materials 9.3.2 INSURANCE AND BONDS 11 Insurance Companies, Consent to Partial Occupancy 9.9.1 Insured loss, Adjustment and Settlement of 11.5 Intent of the Contract Documents 1.2.1, 4.2.7, 4.2.12, 4.2.13 Interest 13.5 Interpretation 1.1.8, 1.2.3, 1.4, 4.1.1, 5.1, 6.1.2, 15.1.1 Interpretations, Written 4.2.11, 4.2.12 Judgment on Final Award 15.4.2 Labor and Materials, Equipment 1.1.3, 1.1.6, 3.4, 3.5, 3.8.2, 3.8.3, 3.12, 3.13, 3.15.1, 5.2.1, 6.2.1, 7.3.4, 9.3.2, 9.3.3, 9.5.1.3, 9.10.2, 10.2.1, 10.2.4, 14.2.1.1, 14.2.1.2 Labor Disputes 8.3.1 Laws and Regulations 1.5, 2.3.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.6, 3.7, 3.12.10, 3.13, 9.6.4, 9.9.1, 10.2.2, 13.1, 13.3.1, 13.4.2, 13.5, 14, 15.2.8, 15.4 Liens 2.1.2, 9.3.1, 9.3.3, 9.6.8, 9.10.2, 9.10.4, 15.2.8 Limitations, Statutes of 12.2.5, 15.1.2, 15.4.1.1 Limitations of Liability 3.2.2, 3.5, 3.12.10, 3.12.10.1, 3.17, 3.18.1, 4.2.6, 4.2.7, 6.2.2, 9.4.2, 9.6.4, 9.6.7, 9.6.8, 10.2.5, 10.3.3, 11.3, 12.2.5, 13.3.1 Limitations of Time 2.1.2, 2.2, 2.5, 3.2.2, 3.10, 3.11, 3.12.5, 3.15.1, 4.2.7, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4.1, 6.2.4, 7.3, 7.4, 8.2, 9.2, 9.3.1, 9.3.3, 201 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 7 236480v1 9.4.1, 9.5, 9.6, 9.7, 9.8, 9.9, 9.10, 12.2, 13.4, 14, 15, 15.1.2, 15.1.3, 15.1.5 Materials, Hazardous 10.2.4, 10.3 Materials, Labor, Equipment and 1.1.3, 1.1.6, 3.4.1, 3.5, 3.8.2, 3.8.3, 3.12, 3.13, 3.15.1, 5.2.1, 6.2.1, 7.3.4, 9.3.2, 9.3.3, 9.5.1.3, 9.10.2, 10.2.1.2, 10.2.4, 14.2.1.1, 14.2.1.2 Means, Methods, Techniques, Sequences and Procedures of Construction 3.3.1, 3.12.10, 4.2.2, 4.2.7, 9.4.2 Mechanic’s Lien 2.1.2, 9.3.1, 9.3.3, 9.6.8, 9.10.2, 9.10.4, 15.2.8 Mediation 8.3.1, 15.1.3.2, 15.2.1, 15.2.5, 15.2.6, 15.3, 15.4.1, 15.4.1.1 Minor Changes in the Work 1.1.1, 3.4.2, 3.12.8, 4.2.8, 7.1, 7.4 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 13 Modifications, Definition of 1.1.1 Modifications to the Contract 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 2.5, 3.11, 4.1.2, 4.2.1, 5.2.3, 7, 8.3.1, 9.7, 10.3.2 Mutual Responsibility 6.2 Nonconforming Work, Acceptance of 9.6.6, 9.9.3, 12.3 Nonconforming Work, Rejection and Correction of 2.4, 2.5, 3.5, 4.2.6, 6.2.4, 9.5.1, 9.8.2, 9.9.3, 9.10.4, 12.2 Notice 1.6, 1.6.1, 1.6.2, 2.1.2, 2.2.2., 2.2.3, 2.2.4, 2.5, 3.2.4, 3.3.1, 3.7.4, 3.7.5, 3.9.2, 3.12.9, 3.12.10, 5.2.1, 7.4, 8.2.2 9.6.8, 9.7, 9.10.1, 10.2.8, 10.3.2, 11.5, 12.2.2.1, 13.4.1, 13.4.2, 14.1, 14.2.2, 14.4.2, 15.1.3, 15.1.5, 15.1.6, 15.4.1 Notice of Cancellation or Expiration of Insurance 11.1.4, 11.2.3 Notice of Claims 1.6.2, 2.1.2, 3.7.4, 9.6.8, 10.2.8, 15.1.3, 15.1.5, 15.1.6, 15.2.8, 15.3.2, 15.4.1 Notice of Testing and Inspections 13.4.1, 13.4.2 Observations, Contractor’s 3.2, 3.7.4 Occupancy 2.3.1, 9.6.6, 9.8 Orders, Written 1.1.1, 2.4, 3.9.2, 7, 8.2.2, 11.5, 12.1, 12.2.2.1, 13.4.2, 14.3.1 OWNER 2 Owner, Definition of 2.1.1 Owner, Evidence of Financial Arrangements 2.2, 13.2.2, 14.1.1.4 Owner, Information and Services Required of the 2.1.2, 2.2, 2.3, 3.2.2, 3.12.10, 6.1.3, 6.1.4, 6.2.5, 9.3.2, 9.6.1, 9.6.4, 9.9.2, 9.10.3, 10.3.3, 11.2, 13.4.1, 13.4.2, 14.1.1.4, 14.1.4, 15.1.4 Owner’s Authority 1.5, 2.1.1, 2.3.32.4, 2.5, 3.4.2, 3.8.1, 3.12.10, 3.14.2, 4.1.2, 4.2.4, 4.2.9, 5.2.1, 5.2.4, 5.4.1, 6.1, 6.3, 7.2.1, 7.3.1, 8.2.2, 8.3.1, 9.3.2, 9.5.1, 9.6.4, 9.9.1, 9.10.2, 10.3.2, 11.4, 11.5, 12.2.2, 12.3, 13.2.2, 14.3, 14.4, 15.2.7 Owner’s Insurance 11.2 Owner’s Relationship with Subcontractors 1.1.2, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 9.6.4, 9.10.2, 14.2.2 Owner’s Right to Carry Out the Work 2.5, 14.2.2 Owner’s Right to Clean Up 6.3 Owner’s Right to Perform Construction and to Award Separate Contracts 6.1 Owner’s Right to Stop the Work 2.4 Owner’s Right to Suspend the Work 14.3 Owner’s Right to Terminate the Contract 14.2, 14.4 Ownership and Use of Drawings, Specifications and Other Instruments of Service 1.1.1, 1.1.6, 1.1.7, 1.5, 2.3.6, 3.2.2, 3.11, 3.17, 4.2.12, 5.3 Partial Occupancy or Use 9.6.6, 9.9 Patching, Cutting and 3.14, 6.2.5 Patents 3.17 Payment, Applications for 4.2.5, 7.3.9, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 9.6.3, 9.7, 9.8.5, 9.10.1, 14.2.3, 14.2.4, 14.4.3 Payment, Certificates for 4.2.5, 4.2.9, 9.3.3, 9.4, 9.5, 9.6.1, 9.6.6, 9.7, 9.10.1, 9.10.3, 14.1.1.3, 14.2.4 Payment, Failure of 9.5.1.3, 9.7, 9.10.2, 13.5, 14.1.1.3, 14.2.1.2 Payment, Final 4.2.1, 4.2.9, 9.10, 12.3, 14.2.4, 14.4.3 Payment Bond, Performance Bond and 7.3.4.4, 9.6.7, 9.10.3, 11.1.2 Payments, Progress 9.3, 9.6, 9.8.5, 9.10.3, 14.2.3, 15.1.4 202 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 8 236480v1 PAYMENTS AND COMPLETION 9 Payments to Subcontractors 5.4.2, 9.5.1.3, 9.6.2, 9.6.3, 9.6.4, 9.6.7, 14.2.1.2 PCB 10.3.1 Performance Bond and Payment Bond 7.3.4.4, 9.6.7, 9.10.3, 11.1.2 Permits, Fees, Notices and Compliance with Laws 2.3.1, 3.7, 3.13, 7.3.4.4, 10.2.2 PERSONS AND PROPERTY, PROTECTION OF 10 Polychlorinated Biphenyl 10.3.1 Product Data, Definition of 3.12.2 Product Data and Samples, Shop Drawings 3.11, 3.12, 4.2.7 Progress and Completion 4.2.2, 8.2, 9.8, 9.9.1, 14.1.4, 15.1.4 Progress Payments 9.3, 9.6, 9.8.5, 9.10.3, 14.2.3, 15.1.4 Project, Definition of 1.1.4 Project Representatives 4.2.10 Property Insurance 10.2.5, 11.2 Proposal Requirements 1.1.1 PROTECTION OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY 10 Regulations and Laws 1.5, 2.3.2, 3.2.3, 3.6, 3.7, 3.12.10, 3.13, 9.6.4, 9.9.1, 10.2.2, 13.1, 13.3, 13.4.1, 13.4.2, 13.5, 14, 15.2.8, 15.4 Rejection of Work 4.2.6, 12.2.1 Releases and Waivers of Liens 9.3.1, 9.10.2 Representations 3.2.1, 3.5, 3.12.6, 8.2.1, 9.3.3, 9.4.2, 9.5.1, 9.10.1 Representatives 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 3.9, 4.1.1, 4.2.10, 13.2.1 Responsibility for Those Performing the Work 3.3.2, 3.18, 4.2.2, 4.2.3, 5.3, 6.1.3, 6.2, 6.3, 9.5.1, 10 Retainage 9.3.1, 9.6.2, 9.8.5, 9.9.1, 9.10.2, 9.10.3 Review of Contract Documents and Field Conditions by Contractor 3.2, 3.12.7, 6.1.3 Review of Contractor’s Submittals by Owner and Architect 3.10.1, 3.10.2, 3.11, 3.12, 4.2, 5.2, 6.1.3, 9.2, 9.8.2 Review of Shop Drawings, Product Data and Samples by Contractor 3.12 Rights and Remedies 1.1.2, 2.4, 2.5, 3.5, 3.7.4, 3.15.2, 4.2.6, 5.3, 5.4, 6.1, 6.3, 7.3.1, 8.3, 9.5.1, 9.7, 10.2.5, 10.3, 12.2.1, 12.2.2, 12.2.4, 13.3, 14, 15.4 Royalties, Patents and Copyrights 3.17 Rules and Notices for Arbitration 15.4.1 Safety of Persons and Property 10.2, 10.4 Safety Precautions and Programs 3.3.1, 4.2.2, 4.2.7, 5.3, 10.1, 10.2, 10.4 Samples, Definition of 3.12.3 Samples, Shop Drawings, Product Data and 3.11, 3.12, 4.2.7 Samples at the Site, Documents and 3.11 Schedule of Values 9.2, 9.3.1 Schedules, Construction 3.10, 3.12.1, 3.12.2, 6.1.3, 15.1.6.2 Separate Contracts and Contractors 1.1.4, 3.12.5, 3.14.2, 4.2.4, 4.2.7, 6, 8.3.1, 12.1.2 Separate Contractors, Definition of 6.1.1 Shop Drawings, Definition of 3.12.1 Shop Drawings, Product Data and Samples 3.11, 3.12, 4.2.7 Site, Use of 3.13, 6.1.1, 6.2.1 Site Inspections 3.2.2, 3.3.3, 3.7.1, 3.7.4, 4.2, 9.9.2, 9.4.2, 9.10.1, 13.4 Site Visits, Architect’s 3.7.4, 4.2.2, 4.2.9, 9.4.2, 9.5.1, 9.9.2, 9.10.1, 13.4 Special Inspections and Testing 4.2.6, 12.2.1, 13.4 Specifications, Definition of 1.1.6 Specifications 1.1.1, 1.1.6, 1.2.2, 1.5, 3.12.10, 3.17, 4.2.14 Statute of Limitations 15.1.2, 15.4.1.1 Stopping the Work 2.2.2, 2.4, 9.7, 10.3, 14.1 Stored Materials 6.2.1, 9.3.2, 10.2.1.2, 10.2.4 Subcontractor, Definition of 5.1.1 SUBCONTRACTORS 5 203 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 9 236480v1 Subcontractors, Work by 1.2.2, 3.3.2, 3.12.1, 3.18, 4.2.3, 5.2.3, 5.3, 5.4, 9.3.1.2, 9.6.7 Subcontractual Relations 5.3, 5.4, 9.3.1.2, 9.6, 9.10, 10.2.1, 14.1, 14.2.1 Submittals 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, 4.2.7, 5.2.1, 5.2.3, 7.3.4, 9.2, 9.3, 9.8, 9.9.1, 9.10.2, 9.10.3 Submittal Schedule 3.10.2, 3.12.5, 4.2.7 Subrogation, Waivers of 6.1.1, 11.3 Substances, Hazardous 10.3 Substantial Completion 4.2.9, 8.1.1, 8.1.3, 8.2.3, 9.4.2, 9.8, 9.9.1, 9.10.3, 12.2, 15.1.2 Substantial Completion, Definition of 9.8.1 Substitution of Subcontractors 5.2.3, 5.2.4 Substitution of Architect 2.3.3 Substitutions of Materials 3.4.2, 3.5, 7.3.8 Sub-subcontractor, Definition of 5.1.2 Subsurface Conditions 3.7.4 Successors and Assigns 13.2 Superintendent 3.9, 10.2.6 Supervision and Construction Procedures 1.2.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.12.10, 4.2.2, 4.2.7, 6.1.3, 6.2.4, 7.1.3, 7.3.4, 8.2, 8.3.1, 9.4.2, 10, 12, 14, 15.1.4 Suppliers 1.5, 3.12.1, 4.2.4, 4.2.6, 5.2.1, 9.3, 9.4.2, 9.5.4, 9.6, 9.10.5, 14.2.1 Surety 5.4.1.2, 9.6.8, 9.8.5, 9.10.2, 9.10.3, 11.1.2, 14.2.2, 15.2.7 Surety, Consent of 9.8.5, 9.10.2, 9.10.3 Surveys 1.1.7, 2.3.4 Suspension by the Owner for Convenience 14.3 Suspension of the Work 3.7.5, 5.4.2, 14.3 Suspension or Termination of the Contract 5.4.1.1, 14 Taxes 3.6, 3.8.2.1, 7.3.4.4 Termination by the Contractor 14.1, 15.1.7 Termination by the Owner for Cause 5.4.1.1, 14.2, 15.1.7 Termination by the Owner for Convenience 14.4 Termination of the Architect 2.3.3 Termination of the Contractor Employment 14.2.2 TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF THE CONTRACT 14 Tests and Inspections 3.1.3, 3.3.3, 3.7.1, 4.2.2, 4.2.6, 4.2.9, 9.4.2, 9.8.3, 9.9.2, 9.10.1, 10.3.2, 12.2.1, 13.4 TIME 8 Time, Delays and Extensions of 3.2.4, 3.7.4, 5.2.3, 7.2.1, 7.3.1, 7.4, 8.3, 9.5.1, 9.7, 10.3.2, 10.4, 14.3.2, 15.1.6, 15.2.5 Time Limits 2.1.2, 2.2, 2.5, 3.2.2, 3.10, 3.11, 3.12.5, 3.15.1, 4.2, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 6.2.4, 7.3, 7.4, 8.2, 9.2, 9.3.1, 9.3.3, 9.4.1, 9.5, 9.6, 9.7, 9.8, 9.9, 9.10, 12.2, 13.4, 14, 15.1.2, 15.1.3, 15.4 Time Limits on Claims 3.7.4, 10.2.8, 15.1.2, 15.1.3 Title to Work 9.3.2, 9.3.3 UNCOVERING AND CORRECTION OF WORK 12 Uncovering of Work 12.1 Unforeseen Conditions, Concealed or Unknown 3.7.4, 8.3.1, 10.3 Unit Prices 7.3.3.2, 9.1.2 Use of Documents 1.1.1, 1.5, 2.3.6, 3.12.6, 5.3 Use of Site 3.13, 6.1.1, 6.2.1 Values, Schedule of 9.2, 9.3.1 Waiver of Claims by the Architect 13.3.2 Waiver of Claims by the Contractor 9.10.5, 13.3.2, 15.1.7 Waiver of Claims by the Owner 9.9.3, 9.10.3, 9.10.4, 12.2.2.1, 13.3.2, 14.2.4, 15.1.7 Waiver of Consequential Damages 14.2.4, 15.1.7 204 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 10 236480v1 Waiver of Liens 9.3, 9.10.2, 9.10.4 Waivers of Subrogation 6.1.1, 11.3 Warranty 3.5, 4.2.9, 9.3.3, 9.8.4, 9.9.1, 9.10.2, 9.10.4, 12.2.2, 15.1.2 Weather Delays 8.3, 15.1.6.2 Work, Definition of 1.1.3 Written Consent 1.5.2, 3.4.2, 3.7.4, 3.12.8, 3.14.2, 4.1.2, 9.3.2, 9.10.3, 13.2, 13.3.2, 15.4.4.2 Written Interpretations 4.2.11, 4.2.12 Written Orders 1.1.1, 2.4, 3.9, 7, 8.2.2, 12.1, 12.2, 13.4.2, 14.3.1 205 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 11 236480v1 ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS § 1.1 Basic Definitions § 1.1.1 The Contract Documents The Contract Documents are enumerated in the Agreement between the Owner and Contractor (hereinafter the Agreement) and consist of the Agreement, Conditions of the Contract (General, Supplementary and other Conditions), Drawings, Specifications, Addenda issued prior to execution of the Contract, other documents listed in the Agreement, and Modifications issued after execution of the Contract. A Modification is (1) a written amendment to the Contract signed by both parties, (2) a Change Order, (3) a Construction Change Directive, or (4) a written order for a minor change in the Work issued by the Architect. Unless specifically enumerated in the Agreement, the Contract Documents do not include the advertisement or invitation to bid, Instructions to Bidders, sample forms, other information furnished by the Owner in anticipation of receiving bids or proposals, the Contractor’s bid or proposal, or portions of Addenda relating to bidding or proposal requirements. § 1.1.2 The Contract The Contract Documents form the Contract for Construction. The Contract represents the entire and integrated agreement between the parties hereto and supersedes prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral. The Contract may be amended or modified only by a Modification. The Contract Documents shall not be construed to create a contractual relationship of any kind (1) between the Contractor and the Architect or the Architect’s consultants, (2) between the Owner and a Subcontractor or a Sub-subcontractor, (3) between the Owner and the Architect or the Architect’s consultants, or (4) between any persons or entities other than the Owner and the Contractor. § 1.1.3 The Work The term “Work” means the construction and services required by the Contract Documents and includes all other labor, materials, equipment, and services provided or to be provided by the Contractor to fulfill the Contractor’s obligations. The Work may constitute the whole or a part of the Project. § 1.1.4 The Project The Project is the total construction of which the Work performed under the Contract Documents may be the whole or a part and which may include construction by the Owner and by Separate Contractors. § 1.1.5 The Drawings The Drawings are the graphic and pictorial portions of the Contract Documents showing the design, location and dimensions of the Work, generally including plans, elevations, sections, details, schedules, and diagrams. § 1.1.6 The Specifications The Specifications are that portion of the Contract Documents consisting of the written requirements for materials, equipment, systems, standards and workmanship for the Work, and performance of related services. § 1.1.7 Instruments of Service Instruments of Service are representations, in any medium of expression now known or later developed, of the tangible and intangible creative work performed by the Architect and the Architect’s consultants under their respective professional services agreements. Instruments of Service may include, without limitation, studies, surveys, models, sketches, drawings, specifications, and other similar materials. § 1.1.8 Initial Decision Maker The Initial Decision Maker is the person identified in the Agreement to render initial decisions on Claims in accordance with Section 15.2. The Initial Decision Maker shall not show partiality to the Owner or Contractor and shall not be liable for results of interpretations or decisions rendered in good faith. § 1.2 Correlation and Intent of the Contract Documents § 1.2.1 The Contract Documents are to be read and interpreted as a whole. The intent of the Contract Documents is to include all items necessary for the proper execution and completion of the Work and to require Contractor to provide the highest quality and greatest quantity consistent with the Contract Documents. If there are inconsistencies within or among part of the Contract Documents or between the 206 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 12 236480v1 Contract Documents and applicable standards, codes or ordinances, the Contractor shall provide the better quality or greater quantity of Work or comply with the more stringent requirements; either or all in accordance with the Architect’s interpretation. The terms and conditions of this subparagraph 1.2.1 shall not relieve the Contractor of any of its obligations as set forth in Article 3. .1 Before ordering any materials or doing any Work, the Contractor shall verify measurements at the Project site and shall be responsible for the correctness of such measurements. No extra charges or compensation will be allowed on account of differences between actual dimensions and the dimensions indicated on the Drawings. Any difference that may be found shall be submitted to the Architect for resolution before proceeding with the Work. .2 If a minor change in the Work is necessary due to actual field conditions, the Contractor shall submit detailed drawings of such departure to the Architect for approval by the Architect before making the change. The Owner shall not be required to make any adjustment to either the Contract Sum or Contract Time because of any failure by the Contractor to comply with the requirements of this Subparagraph 1.2.1. Actual or alleged conflicts or inconsistencies between the Drawings and Specifications or other Contract Documents shall be brought to the Architect’s and Architect’s attention in writing, prior to performing the affected Work. The Architect’s and Construction Manager’s directions, as communicated through the Architect, shall be followed by the Contractor. § 1.2.1.1 The invalidity of any provision of the Contract Documents shall not invalidate the Contract or its remaining provisions. If it is determined that any provision of the Contract Documents violates any law, or is otherwise invalid or unenforceable, then that provision shall be revised to the extent necessary to make that provision legal and enforceable. In such case the Contract Documents shall be construed, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to give effect to the parties’ intentions and purposes in executing the Contract. § 1.2.2 Organization of the Specifications into divisions, sections and articles, and arrangement of Drawings shall not control the Contractor in dividing the Work among Subcontractors or in establishing the extent of Work to be performed by any trade. § 1.2.3 Unless otherwise stated in the Contract Documents, words that have well-known technical or construction industry meanings are used in the Contract Documents in accordance with such recognized meanings. § 1.3 Capitalization Terms capitalized in these General Conditions include those that are (1) specifically defined, (2) the titles of numbered articles, or (3) the titles of other documents published by the American Institute of Architects. § 1.4 Interpretation In the interest of brevity the Contract Documents frequently omit modifying words such as “all” and “any” and articles such as “the” and “an,” but the fact that a modifier or an article is absent from one statement and appears in another is not intended to affect the interpretation of either statement. § 1.5 Ownership and Use of Drawings, Specifications, and Other Instruments of Service § 1.5.1 The Architect and the Architect’s consultants shall be deemed the authors and owners of their respective Instruments of Service, including the Drawings and Specifications, and retain all common law, statutory, and other reserved rights in their Instruments of Service, including copyrights. The Contractor, Subcontractors, Sub- subcontractors, and suppliers shall not own or claim a copyright in the Instruments of Service. Submittal or distribution to meet official regulatory requirements or for other purposes in connection with the Project is not to be construed as publication in derogation of the Architect’s or Architect’s consultants’ reserved rights. § 1.5.2 The Contractor, Subcontractors, Sub-subcontractors, and suppliers are authorized to use and reproduce the Instruments of Service provided to them, subject to any protocols established pursuant to Sections 1.7 and 1.8, solely 207 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 13 236480v1 and exclusively for execution of the Work. All copies made under this authorization shall bear the copyright notice, if any, shown on the Instruments of Service. The Contractor, Subcontractors, Sub-subcontractors, and suppliers may not use the Instruments of Service on other projects or for additions to the Project outside the scope of the Work without the specific written consent of the Owner, Architect, and the Architect’s consultants. § 1.6 Notice § 1.6.1 Except as otherwise provided in Section 1.6.2, where the Contract Documents require one party to notify or give notice to the other party, such notice shall be provided in writing to the designated representative of the party to whom the notice is addressed and shall be deemed to have been duly served if delivered in person, by mail, by courier, or by electronic transmission if a method for electronic transmission is set forth in the Agreement. § 1.6.2 Notice of Claims as provided in Section 15.1.3 shall be provided in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly served only if delivered to the designated representative of the party to whom the notice is addressed by certified or registered mail, or by courier providing proof of delivery. § 1.7 Digital Data Use and Transmission The parties shall agree upon protocols governing the transmission and use of Instruments of Service or any other information or documentation in digital form. The parties will use AIA Document E203™–2013, Building Information Modeling and Digital Data Exhibit, to establish the protocols for the development, use, transmission, and exchange of digital data. § 1.8 Building Information Models Use and Reliance Any use of, or reliance on, all or a portion of a building information model without agreement to protocols governing the use of, and reliance on, the information contained in the model and without having those protocols set forth in AIA Document E203™–2013, Building Information Modeling and Digital Data Exhibit, and the requisite AIA Document G202™–2013, Project Building Information Modeling Protocol Form, shall be at the using or relying party’s sole risk and without liability to the other party and its contractors or consultants, the authors of, or contributors to, the building information model, and each of their agents and employees. ARTICLE 2 OWNER § 2.1 General § 2.1.1 The Owner is the person or entity identified as such in the Agreement and is referred to throughout the Contract Documents as if singular in number. The Owner shall designate in writing a representative who shall have express authority to bind the Owner with respect to all matters. The term “Owner” means the Owner or the Owner’s authorized representative. § 2.1.2 Work is to proceed as a no-lien Project in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota regarding public projects. Contractor shall provide to the Owner both a Labor and Material Payment Bond and a Performance Bond each in the amount of the Contract Price prior to the commencement of Work as required by Minnesota Statutes 574.26. The Contractor, for itself and for all who claim through the Contractor, acknowledges and agrees: (i) that because it is a public project, no lien shall attach to the real estate on which the Project is located or to any improvements now existing or to be constructed thereon in favor of the Contractor or any Subcontractor, mechanic, journeyman, laborer, material vendor, lessor of tools or equipment or any other party who may furnish work, materials, equipment, services, tools or machinery for the design or construction of improvements on the land. The Contractor shall also provide written notice of the no-lien status of this Project to all of its Subcontractors, material suppliers, equipment lessors and others that provide labor, material, equipment and/or services for the Project. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the Owner and Architect harmless from any suit, lien, damages, losses or expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. § 2.2 [Not Used] 208 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 14 236480v1 § 2.3 Information and Services Required of the Owner § 2.3.1 Except for permits and fees that are the responsibility of the Contractor under the Contract Documents, including those required under Section 3.7.1, the Owner shall secure and pay for necessary approvals, easements, assessments and charges required for construction, use or occupancy of permanent structures or for permanent changes in existing facilities. § 2.3.2 The Owner shall retain an architect lawfully licensed to practice architecture, or an entity lawfully practicing architecture, in the jurisdiction where the Project is located. That person or entity is identified as the Architect in the Agreement and is referred to throughout the Contract Documents as if singular in number. § 2.3.3 If the employment of the Architect terminates, the Owner shall employ a successor whose status under the Contract Documents shall be that of the Architect. § 2.3.4 The Owner shall furnish surveys describing physical characteristics, legal limitations and utility locations for the site of the Project, and a legal description of the site. The Contractor shall be entitled to rely on the accuracy of information furnished by the Owner but shall exercise proper precautions relating to the safe performance of the Work. § 2.3.5 The Owner shall furnish information or services required of the Owner by the Contract Documents with reasonable promptness. The Owner shall also furnish any other information or services under the Owner’s control and relevant to the Contractor’s performance of the Work with reasonable promptness after receiving the Contractor’s written request for such information or services. § 2.3.6 Unless otherwise provided in the Contract Documents, the Owner shall furnish to the Contractor one copy of the Contract Documents for purposes of making reproductions pursuant to Section 1.5.2. § 2.4 Owner’s Right to Stop the Work If the Contractor fails to correct Work that is not in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents as required by Section 12.2 or persistently and willfully fails to carry out Work in accordance with the Contract Documents, and fails within a 10-day period after receipt of written notice from the owners to commence and continue correction of such work, the Owner may issue a written order to the Contractor to stop the Work, or any portion thereof, until the cause for such order has been eliminated; however, the right of the Owner to stop the Work shall not give rise to a duty on the part of the Owner to exercise this right for the benefit of the Contractor or any other person or entity, except to the extent required by Section 6.1.3. § 2.5 Owner’s Right to Carry Out the Work If the Contractor defaults or neglects to carry out the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents and fails within a ten-day period after receipt of notice from the Owner to commence and continue correction of such default or neglect with diligence and promptness, the Owner may, without prejudice to other remedies the Owner may have, correct such default or neglect. Such action by the Owner and amounts charged to the Contractor are both subject to prior approval of the Architect and the Architect may, pursuant to Section 9.5.1, withhold or nullify a Certificate for Payment in whole or in part, to the extent reasonably necessary to reimburse the Owner for the reasonable cost of correcting such deficiencies, including Owner’s expenses and compensation for the Architect’s additional services made necessary by such default, neglect, or failure. If current and future payments are not sufficient to cover such amounts, the Contractor shall pay the difference to the Owner. If the Contractor disagrees with the actions of the Owner or the Architect, or the amounts claimed as costs to the Owner, the Contractor may file a Claim pursuant to Article 15. ARTICLE 3 CONTRACTOR § 3.1 General § 3.1.1 The Contractor is the person or entity identified as such in the Agreement and is referred to throughout the Contract Documents as if singular in number. The Contractor shall be lawfully licensed, if required in the jurisdiction where the Project is located. The Contractor shall designate in writing a representative who shall have sole authority to bind the Contractor with respect to all matters under this Contract. The term “Contractor” means the Contractor or the Contractor’s authorized representative. 209 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 15 236480v1 § 3.1.2 The Contractor shall perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. § 3.1.3 The Contractor shall not be relieved of its obligations to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents either by activities or duties of the Architect in the Architect’s administration of the Contract, or by tests, inspections or approvals required or performed by persons or entities other than the Contractor. § 3.2 Review of Contract Documents and Field Conditions by Contractor § 3.2.1 Execution of the Contract by the Contractor is a representation that the Contractor has visited the site, become generally familiar with local conditions under which the Work is to be performed, and correlated personal observations with requirements of the Contract Documents. § 3.2.2 The Contractor shall, before starting each portion of the Work, review the various Contract Documents relative to that portion of the Work, as well as the information furnished by the Owner pursuant to Section 2.3.4, shall take field measurements of any existing conditions related to that portion of the Work, and shall observe any conditions at the site affecting it. These obligations are for the purpose of facilitating construction by the Contractor and are not for the purpose of discovering errors, omissions, or inconsistencies in the Contract Documents; however, the Contractor shall promptly report to the Architect any errors, inconsistencies or omissions discovered by the Contractor as a request for information in such form as the Architect may require. It is recognized that the Contractor’s review is made in the Contractor’s capacity as a contractor and not as a licensed design professional, unless otherwise specifically provided in the Contract Documents. § 3.2.3 The Contractor is not required to ascertain that the Contract Documents are in accordance with applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, codes, rules and regulations, or lawful orders of public authorities, but the Contractor shall promptly report to the Architect any nonconformity discovered by the Contractor as a request for information in such form as the Architect may require. § 3.2.4 If the Contractor believes that additional cost or time is involved because of clarifications or instructions the Architect issues in response to the Contractor’s notices or requests for information pursuant to Sections 3.2.2 or 3.2.3, the Contractor shall submit Claims as provided in Article 15. If the Contractor fails to perform the obligations of Sections 3.2.2 or 3.2.3, the Contractor shall pay such costs and damages to the Owner, subject to Section 15.1.7, as would have been avoided if the Contractor had performed such obligations. If the Contractor performs those obligations, the Contractor shall not be liable to the Owner or Architect for damages resulting from errors, inconsistencies or omissions in the Contract Documents, for differences between field measurements or conditions and the Contract Documents, or for nonconformities of the Contract Documents to applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, codes, rules and regulations, and lawful orders of public authorities unless the Contractor recognized such error, inconsistency, omission, difference, or nonconformity and knowingly failed to report it. § 3.3 Supervision and Construction Procedures § 3.3.1 The Contractor shall coordinate the Work, using the Contractor’s best skill and attention. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for, and have control over, construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures, and for coordinating all portions of the Work under the Contract. If the Contract Documents give specific instructions concerning construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, the Contractor shall evaluate the jobsite safety thereof and shall be solely responsible for the jobsite safety of such means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures. If the Contractor determines that such means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures may not be safe, the Contractor shall give timely notice to the Owner and Architect, and shall propose alternative means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures. The Architect shall evaluate the proposed alternative solely for conformance with the design intent for the completed construction. Unless the Architect objects to the Contractor’s proposed alternative, the Contractor shall perform the Work using its alternative means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures. Nothing in this paragraph, or in any other portion of these General Conditions, the Agreement, or any of the Contract Documents is meant to nor shall create a duty owed by the Contractor to any person or entity other than the Owner. 210 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 16 236480v1 § 3.3.2 The Contractor shall be responsible to the Owner for acts and omissions of the Contractor’s employees, Subcontractors and their agents and employees, and other persons or entities performing portions of the Work for, or on behalf of, the Contractor or any of its Subcontractors. § 3.3.3 The Contractor shall be responsible for inspection of portions of Work already performed to determine that such portions are in proper condition to receive subsequent Work. § 3.4 Labor and Materials § 3.4.1 Unless otherwise provided in the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall provide and pay for labor, materials, equipment, tools, construction equipment and machinery, water, heat, utilities, transportation, and other facilities and services reasonably necessary for proper execution and completion of the Work, whether temporary or permanent and whether or not incorporated or to be incorporated in the Work. § 3.4.2 The Contractor may make substitutions only with the consent of the Owner, after evaluation by the Architect and in accordance with a Change Order or Construction Change Directive. § 3.4.3 The Contractor shall enforce strict discipline and good order among the Contractor’s employees and other persons carrying out the Work. The Contractor shall not permit employment of unfit persons or persons not properly skilled in tasks assigned to them. § 3.5 Warranty § 3.5.1 The Contractor warrants to the Owner that materials and equipment furnished under the Contract will be of good quality and new unless the Contract Documents require or permit otherwise. The Contractor further warrants that the Work will conform to the requirements of the Contract Documents and will be free from defects, except for those inherent in the quality of the Work or otherwise expressly permitted by the Contract Documents. Work, materials, or equipment not conforming to these requirements may be considered defective. The Contractor’s warranty excludes remedy for damage or defect caused by abuse, alterations to the Work not executed by the Contractor, improper or insufficient maintenance, improper operation, or normal wear and tear and normal usage. If required by the Architect, the Contractor shall furnish satisfactory evidence as to the kind and quality of materials and equipment. Other than the above, the Contractor makes no other warranty, representation, or guarantee, whether express or implied, and such are expressly disclaimed. § 3.5.2 All material, equipment, or other special warranties required by the Contract Documents shall be issued in the name of the Owner, or shall be transferable to the Owner, and shall commence in accordance with Section 9.8.4. § 3.6 Taxes The Contractor shall pay sales, consumer, use and similar taxes for the Work provided by the Contractor that are legally enacted when bids are received or negotiations concluded, whether or not yet effective or merely scheduled to go into effect. § 3.7 Permits, Fees, Notices and Compliance with Laws § 3.7.1 Unless otherwise provided in the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall secure and pay for the building permit as well as for other permits, fees, licenses, and inspections by government agencies necessary for proper execution and completion of the Work. § 3.7.2 The Contractor shall comply with and give notices required by applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, codes, rules and regulations, and lawful orders of public authorities applicable to performance of the Work. § 3.7.3 If the Contractor performs Work knowing it to be contrary to applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, codes, rules and regulations, or lawful orders of public authorities, the Contractor shall assume appropriate responsibility for such Work and shall bear the costs attributable to correction. 211 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 17 236480v1 § 3.7.4 Concealed or Unknown Conditions If the Contractor encounters conditions at the site that are (1) subsurface or otherwise concealed physical conditions that differ materially from those indicated in the Contract Documents or (2) unknown physical conditions of an unusual nature, that differ materially from those ordinarily found to exist and generally recognized as inherent in construction activities of the character provided for in the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall promptly provide notice to the Owner and the Architect before conditions are disturbed and in no event later than 10 days after the first observance of the conditions. The Architect will promptly investigate such conditions and, if the Architect determines that they differ materially and cause an increase or decrease in the Contractor’s cost of, or time required for, performance of any part of the Work, will recommend an equitable adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time, or both. If the Architect determines that the conditions at the site are not materially different from those indicated in the Contract Documents and that no change in the terms of the Contract is justified, the Architect shall promptly notify the Owner and Contractor in writing, stating the reasons. § 3.7.5 If, in the course of the Work, the Contractor encounters human remains or recognizes the existence of burial markers, archaeological sites or wetlands not indicated in the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall immediately suspend any operations that would affect them and shall notify the Owner and Architect. Upon receipt of such notice, the Owner shall promptly take any action necessary to obtain governmental authorization required to resume the operations. The Contractor shall continue to suspend such operations until otherwise instructed by the Owner but shall continue with all other operations that do not affect those remains or features. Requests for adjustments in the Contract Sum and Contract Time arising from the existence of such remains or features may be made as provided in Article 15. § 3.8 Allowances § 3.8.1 The Contractor shall include in the Contract Sum all allowances stated in the Contract Documents. Items covered by allowances shall be supplied for such amounts and by such persons or entities as the Owner may direct, but the Contractor shall not be required to employ persons or entities to whom the Contractor has reasonable objection. § 3.8.2 Unless otherwise provided in the Contract Documents, .1 allowances shall cover the cost to the Contractor of materials and equipment delivered at the site and all required taxes, less applicable trade discounts; .2 Contractor’s costs for unloading and handling at the site, labor, installation costs, overhead, profit, and other expenses contemplated for stated allowance amounts shall be included in the Contract Sum but not in the allowances; and .3 whenever costs are more than or less than allowances, the Contract Sum shall be adjusted accordingly by Change Order. The amount of the Change Order shall reflect (1) the difference between actual costs and the allowances under Section 3.8.2.1 and (2) changes in Contractor’s costs under Section 3.8.2.2. § 3.8.3 Materials and equipment under an allowance shall be selected by the Owner with reasonable promptness. § 3.9 Superintendent The Contractor shall employ a competent superintendent and necessary assistants who shall be in attendance at the Project site during performance of the Work. The superintendent shall represent the Contractor, and communications given to the superintendent shall be as binding as if given to the Contractor. § 3.10 Contractor’s Construction and Submittal Schedules § 3.10.1 The Contractor, promptly after being awarded the Contract, shall submit for the Owner’s and Architect’s information a Contractor’s construction schedule for the Work. The schedule shall contain detail appropriate for the Project, including (1) the date of commencement of the Work, interim schedule milestone dates, and the date of Substantial Completion; (2) an apportionment of the Work by construction activity; and (3) the time required for completion of each portion of the Work. The schedule shall provide for the orderly progression of the Work to completion and shall not exceed time limits current under the Contract Documents. The schedule shall be revised at appropriate intervals as required by the conditions of the Work and Project. 212 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 18 236480v1 § 3.10.2 The Contractor, after being awarded the Contract and thereafter as necessary to maintain a current submittal schedule, shall submit a submittal schedule for the Architect’s approval. The Architect’s approval shall not be unreasonably delayed or withheld. The submittal schedule shall (1) be coordinated with the Contractor’s construction schedule, and (2) allow the Architect reasonable time to review submittals. § 3.10.3 The Contractor shall perform the Work in general accordance with the most recent schedules submitted to the Owner and Architect. § 3.11 Documents and Samples at the Site The Contractor shall make available, at the Project site, the Contract Documents, including Change Orders, Construction Change Directives, and other Modifications, in good order and marked currently to indicate changes and selections made during construction, and the approved Shop Drawings, Product Data, Samples, and similar required submittals. These shall be in electronic form or paper copy, available to the Architect and Owner, and delivered to the Architect for submittal to the Owner upon completion of the Work as a record of the Work as constructed. § 3.12 Shop Drawings, Product Data and Samples § 3.12.1 Shop Drawings are drawings, diagrams, schedules, and other data specially prepared for the Work by the Contractor or a Subcontractor, Sub-subcontractor, manufacturer, supplier, or distributor to illustrate some portion of the Work. § 3.12.2 Product Data are illustrations, standard schedules, performance charts, instructions, brochures, diagrams, and other information furnished by the Contractor to illustrate materials or equipment for some portion of the Work. § 3.12.3 Samples are physical examples that illustrate materials, equipment, or workmanship, and establish standards by which the Work will be judged. § 3.12.4 The Contractor shall review for compliance with the Contract Documents, approve, and submit to the Architect, Shop Drawings, Product Data, Samples, and similar submittals required by the Contract Documents, in accordance with the submittal schedule approved by the Architect or, in the absence of an approved submittal schedule, with reasonable promptness and in such sequence as to cause no delay in the Work or in the activities of the Owner or of Separate Contractors. § 3.12.5 By submitting Shop Drawings, Product Data, Samples, and similar submittals, the Contractor represents to the Owner that the Contractor has (1) reviewed and approved them, (2) determined and verified materials, field measurements and field construction criteria related thereto, or will do so, and (3) checked and coordinated the information contained within such submittals with the requirements of the Work and of the Contract Documents. The Contractor, in making this representation, is relying on the Architect’s having fully coordinated the design drawings. § 3.12.6 The Contractor shall perform no portion of the Work for which the Contract Documents require submittal and review of Shop Drawings, Product Data, Samples, or similar submittals, until the respective submittal has been approved by the Architect. § 3.12.7 The Contractor shall direct specific attention, in writing or on resubmitted Shop Drawings, Product Data, Samples, or similar submittals, to revisions other than those requested by the Architect on previous submittals. In the absence of such notice, the Architect’s approval of a resubmission shall not apply to such revisions. § 3.12.8 The Contractor shall not be required to provide professional services that constitute the practice of architecture or engineering unless such services are specifically required by the Contract Documents for a portion of the Work and are specifically identified in an exhibit to the Contract, or unless the Contractor needs to provide such services in order to carry out the Contractor’s responsibilities for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures. The Contractor shall not be required to provide professional services in violation of applicable law. 213 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 19 236480v1 § 3.12.8.1 If professional design services or certifications by a design professional related to systems, materials, or equipment are specifically required of the Contractor by the Contract Documents, the Owner and the Architect will specify all performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy. The Contractor shall be entitled to rely upon the adequacy and accuracy of the performance and design criteria provided in the Contract Documents. The Contractor shall cause such services or certifications to be provided by an appropriately licensed design professional, whose signature and seal shall appear on all drawings, calculations, specifications, certifications, Shop Drawings, and other submittals prepared by such professional. Shop Drawings, and other submittals related to the Work, designed or certified by such professional, if prepared by others, shall bear such professional’s written approval when submitted to the Architect. The Owner and the Architect shall be entitled to rely upon the adequacy and accuracy of the services, certifications, and approvals performed or provided by such design professionals, provided the Owner and Architect have specified to the Contractor the performance and design criteria that such services must satisfy. Pursuant to this Section 3.12.8, the Architect will review and approve or take other appropriate action on submittals only for the limited purpose of checking for conformance with information given and the design concept expressed in the Contract Documents. § 3.12.8.2 If the Contract Documents require the Contractor’s design professional to certify that the Work has been performed in accordance with the design criteria, the Contractor shall furnish such certifications to the Architect at the time and in the form specified by the Architect. § 3.13 Use of Site The Contractor shall confine operations at the site to areas permitted by applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, codes, rules and regulations, lawful orders of public authorities, and the Contract Documents and shall not unreasonably encumber the site with materials or equipment. § 3.14 Cutting and Patching § 3.14.1 The Contractor shall be responsible for cutting, fitting, or patching required to complete the Work or to make its parts fit together properly. All areas requiring cutting, fitting, or patching shall be restored to the condition existing prior to the cutting, fitting, or patching, unless otherwise required by the Contract Documents. § 3.14.2 The Contractor shall not damage or endanger a portion of the Work or fully or partially completed construction of the Owner or Separate Contractors by cutting, patching, or otherwise altering such construction, or by excavation. The Contractor shall not cut or otherwise alter construction by the Owner or a Separate Contractor except with written consent of the Owner and of the Separate Contractor. Consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. The Contractor shall not unreasonably withhold, from the Owner or a Separate Contractor, its consent to cutting or otherwise altering the Work. § 3.15 Cleaning Up § 3.15.1 The Contractor shall keep the premises free from accumulation of waste materials and rubbish caused by operations under the Contract. At completion of the Work, the Contractor shall remove waste materials, rubbish, the Contractor’s tools, construction equipment, machinery, and surplus materials from and about the Project. § 3.15.2 If the Contractor fails to clean up as provided in the Contract Documents, the Owner may do so and the Owner shall be entitled to reimbursement from the Contractor. § 3.16 Access to Work The Contractor shall provide the Owner and Architect with access to the Work in preparation and progress wherever located. § 3.17 Royalties, Patents and Copyrights The Contractor shall pay all royalties and license fees. The Contractor shall defend suits or claims for infringement of copyrights and patent rights and shall hold the Owner and Architect harmless from loss on account thereof, but shall not be responsible for defense or loss when a particular design, process, or product of a particular manufacturer or manufacturers is required by the Contract Documents, or where the copyright violations are contained in Drawings, Specifications, or other documents prepared by the Owner or Architect. However, if an infringement of a 214 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 20 236480v1 copyright or patent is discovered by, or made known to, the Contractor, the Contractor shall be responsible for the loss unless the information is promptly furnished to the Architect. § 3.18 Indemnification by Contractor § 3.18.1 To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the Owner, including the Owner’s agents and employees, from and against claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees, arising out of or resulting from performance of the Work, but only to the extent caused by the negligent acts or omissions of the Contractor, a Subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, or anyone for whose acts they may be liable, except to the extent such claim, damage, loss, or expense is caused by an act or omission of a party indemnified hereunder. Such obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge, or reduce other rights or obligations of indemnity that would otherwise exist as to a party or person described in this Section 3.18.1. § 3.18.2 The indemnification obligation under Section 3.18.1 shall not be limited by a limitation on amount or type of damages, compensation, or benefits payable by or for the Contractor or a Subcontractor under workers’ compensation acts, disability benefit acts, or other employee benefit acts. § 3.18.3 Indemnification by Owner and Affiliates To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Owner and its affiliates shall indemnify and hold harmless the Contractor, including the Contractor’s agents, employees, Subcontractors, and Consultants from and against claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees, arising out of or resulting from the negligent acts of the Owner and its affiliates, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by them or anyone for whose acts they may be liable, except to the extent such claim, damage, loss, or expense is caused by an act or omission of a party indemnified hereunder. Such obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge, or reduce other rights or obligations of indemnity that would otherwise exist as to a party or person described in this section 3.18.3. ARTICLE 4 ARCHITECT § 4.1 General § 4.1.1 The Architect is the person or entity retained by the Owner pursuant to Section 2.3.2 and identified as such in the Agreement. § 4.1.2 Duties, responsibilities, and limitations of authority of the Architect as set forth in the Contract Documents shall not be restricted, modified, or extended without written consent of the Owner, Contractor, and Architect. Consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. § 4.1.3 Interpretations and decisions of the Architect will be consistent with the intent of, and reasonably inferable from, the Contract Documents and will be in writing or in the form of drawings. When making such interpretations and decisions, the Architect will endeavor to secure faithful performance by Contractor, and will not be liable for results of interpretations or decisions rendered in good faith. § 4.2 Administration of the Contract § 4.2.1 The Architect will provide administration of the Contract as described in the Contract Documents during construction until the date the Architect issues the final Certificate for Payment. The Architect will have authority to act on behalf of the Owner only to the extent provided in the Contract Documents. § 4.2.2 The Architect will visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction, or as otherwise agreed with the Owner, to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and to determine in general if the Work observed is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents. However, the Architect will not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. The Architect will not have control over, charge of, or responsibility for the construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for the safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work, since these are solely the Contractor’s rights and responsibilities under the Contract Documents. § 4.2.3 On the basis of the site visits, the Architect will keep the Owner reasonably informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and promptly report to the Owner (1) known deviations from the 215 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 21 236480v1 Contract Documents, (2) known deviations from the most recent construction schedule submitted by the Contractor, and (3) defects and deficiencies observed in the Work. The Architect will not be responsible for the Contractor’s failure to perform the Work in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. The Architect will not have control over or charge of, and will not be responsible for acts or omissions of, the Contractor, Subcontractors, or their agents or employees, or any other persons or entities performing portions of the Work. § 4.2.4 Communications The Owner and Contractor shall include the Architect in all communications that relate to or affect the Architect’s services or professional responsibilities. The Owner shall promptly notify the Architect of the substance of any direct communications between the Owner and the Contractor otherwise relating to the Project. Communications by and with the Architect’s consultants shall be through the Architect. Communications by and with Subcontractors and suppliers shall be through the Contractor. Communications by and with Separate Contractors shall be through the Owner. The Contract Documents may specify other communication protocols. § 4.2.5 Based on the Architect’s evaluations of the Contractor’s Applications for Payment, the Architect will review and certify the amounts due the Contractor and will issue Certificates for Payment in such amounts. § 4.2.6 The Architect has authority to reject Work that does not conform to the Contract Documents. Whenever the Architect considers it necessary or advisable, the Architect will have authority to require inspection or testing of the Work in accordance with Sections 13.4.2 and 13.4.3, whether or not the Work is fabricated, installed or completed. However, neither this authority of the Architect nor a decision made in good faith either to exercise or not to exercise such authority shall give rise to a duty or responsibility of the Architect to the Contractor, Subcontractors, suppliers, their agents or employees, or other persons or entities performing portions of the Work. § 4.2.7 The Architect will review and approve, or take other appropriate action upon, the Contractor’s submittals such as Shop Drawings, Product Data, and Samples. The Architect’s action will be taken in accordance with the submittal schedule approved by the Architect or, in the absence of an approved submittal schedule, with reasonable promptness as to cause no delay in the Work, or in the activities of the Owner, Contractor, or separate Contractors while allowing sufficient time in the Architect’s professional judgment to permit adequate review. Review of such submittals is not conducted for the purpose of determining the accuracy and completeness of other details such as dimensions and quantities, or for substantiating instructions for installation or performance of equipment or systems, all of which remain the responsibility of the Contractor as required by the Contract Documents. The Architect’s review of the Contractor’s submittals shall not relieve the Contractor of the obligations under Sections 3.3, 3.5, and 3.12. The Architect’s review shall not constitute approval of safety precautions or of any construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures. The Architect’s approval of a specific item shall not indicate approval of an assembly of which the item is a component. § 4.2.8 The Architect will prepare Change Orders and Construction Change Directives. The Architect will investigate and make determinations and recommendations regarding concealed and unknown conditions as provided in Section 3.7.4. § 4.2.9 The Architect will conduct inspections to determine the date or dates of Substantial Completion and the date of final completion; issue Certificates of Substantial Completion pursuant to Section 9.8; receive and forward to the Owner, for the Owner’s review and records, written warranties and related documents required by the Contract and assembled by the Contractor pursuant to Section 9.10; and issue a final Certificate for Payment pursuant to Section 9.10. § 4.2.10 If the Owner and Architect agree, the Architect will provide one or more Project representatives to assist in carrying out the Architect’s responsibilities at the site. The Owner shall notify the Contractor of any change in the duties, responsibilities and limitations of authority of the Project representatives. § 4.2.11 The Architect will interpret and decide matters concerning performance under, and requirements of, the Contract Documents on written request of either the Owner or Contractor. The Architect’s response to such requests will be made in writing within any time limits agreed upon or otherwise with reasonable promptness. 216 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 22 236480v1 § 4.2.12 Interpretations and decisions of the Architect will be consistent with the intent of, and reasonably inferable from, the Contract Documents and will be in writing or in the form of drawings. When making such interpretations and decisions, the Architect will endeavor to secure faithful performance by both Owner and Contractor, will not show partiality to either, and will not be liable for results of interpretations or decisions rendered in good faith. § 4.2.13 The Owner’s decisions on matters relating to aesthetic effect will be final if consistent with the intent expressed in the Contract Documents. § 4.2.14 The Architect will review and respond to requests for information about the Contract Documents. The Architect’s response to such requests will be made in writing within any time limits agreed upon or otherwise with reasonable promptness. If appropriate, the Architect will prepare and issue supplemental Drawings and Specifications in response to the requests for information. ARTICLE 5 SUBCONTRACTORS § 5.1 Definitions § 5.1.1 A Subcontractor is a person or entity who has a direct contract with the Contractor to perform a portion of the Work at the site. The term “Subcontractor” is referred to throughout the Contract Documents as if singular in number and means a Subcontractor or an authorized representative of the Subcontractor. The term “Subcontractor” does not include a Separate Contractor or the subcontractors of a Separate Contractor. § 5.1.2 A Sub-subcontractor is a person or entity who has a direct or indirect contract with a Subcontractor to perform a portion of the Work at the site. The term “Sub-subcontractor” is referred to throughout the Contract Documents as if singular in number and means a Sub-subcontractor or an authorized representative of the Sub- subcontractor. § 5.2 Award of Subcontracts and Other Contracts for Portions of the Work § 5.2.1 Unless otherwise stated in the Contract Documents, the Contractor, as soon as practicable after award of the Contract, shall notify the Owner of the persons or entities proposed for each principal portion of the Work, including those who are to furnish materials or equipment fabricated to a special design. Within 14 days of receipt of the information, the Owner may notify the Contractor whether the Owner (1) has reasonable objection to any such proposed person or entity or (2) requires additional time for review. Failure of the Owner to provide notice within the 14-day period shall constitute notice of no reasonable objection. § 5.2.2 The Contractor shall not contract with a proposed person or entity to whom the Owner has made reasonable and timely objection. The Contractor shall not be required to contract with anyone to whom the Contractor has made reasonable objection. § 5.2.3 If the Owner has reasonable objection to a person or entity proposed by the Contractor, the Contractor shall propose another to whom the Owner has no reasonable objection. If the proposed but rejected Subcontractor was reasonably capable of performing the Work, the Contract Sum and Contract Time shall be increased or decreased by the difference, if any, occasioned by such change, and an appropriate Change Order shall be issued before commencement of the substitute Subcontractor’s Work. However, no increase in the Contract Sum or Contract Time shall be allowed for such change unless the Contractor has acted responsively in submitting names as required. § 5.3 Subcontractual Relations By appropriate written agreement, the Contractor shall require each Subcontractor, to the extent of the Work to be performed by the Subcontractor, to be bound to the Contractor by terms of the Contract Documents, and to assume toward the Contractor all the obligations and responsibilities, including the responsibility for safety of the Subcontractor’s Work that the Contractor, by these Contract Documents, assumes toward the Owner. Each subcontract agreement shall preserve and protect the rights of the Owner under the Contract Documents with respect to the Work to be performed by the Subcontractor so that subcontracting thereof will not prejudice such rights, and shall allow to the Subcontractor, unless specifically provided otherwise in the subcontract agreement, the benefit of all rights, remedies, and redress against the Contractor that the Contractor, by the Contract Documents, has against the Owner. Where appropriate, the Contractor shall require each Subcontractor to enter into similar agreements with Sub-subcontractors. The Contractor shall make available to each proposed Subcontractor copies of the Contract 217 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 23 236480v1 Documents to which the Subcontractor will be bound, ands. Subcontractors will similarly make copies of applicable portions of such documents available to their respective proposed Sub-subcontractors. § 5.4 Contingent Assignment of Subcontracts § 5.4.1 Each subcontract agreement for a portion of the Work is assigned by the Contractor to the Owner, provided that .1 assignment is effective only after termination of the Contract by the Owner for cause pursuant to Section 14.2 and only for those subcontract agreements that the Owner accepts by notifying the Subcontractor and Contractor; and .2 assignment is subject to the prior rights of the surety, if any, obligated under bond relating to the Contract. When the Owner accepts the assignment of a subcontract agreement, the Owner assumes the Contractor’s rights and obligations under the subcontract. § 5.4.2 Upon such assignment, if the Work has been suspended for more than 30 days, the Subcontractor’s compensation shall be equitably adjusted for increases in cost resulting from the suspension. § 5.4.3 Upon assignment to the Owner under this Section 5.4, the Owner may further assign the subcontract to a successor contractor or other entity. If the Owner assigns the subcontract to a successor contractor or other entity, the Owner shall nevertheless remain legally responsible for all of the successor contractor’s obligations under the subcontract. ARTICLE 6 CONSTRUCTION BY OWNER OR BY SEPARATE CONTRACTORS § 6.1 Owner’s Right to Perform Construction and to Award Separate Contracts § 6.1.1 The term “Separate Contractor(s)” shall mean other contractors retained by the Owner under separate agreements. The Owner reserves the right to perform construction or operations related to the Project with the Owner’s own forces, and with Separate Contractors retained under Conditions of the Contract substantially similar to those of this Contract, including those provisions of the Conditions of the Contract related to insurance and waiver of subrogation. § 6.1.2 When separate contracts are awarded for different portions of the Project or other construction or operations on the site, the term “Contractor” in the Contract Documents in each case shall mean the Contractor who executes each separate Owner-Contractor Agreement. § 6.1.3 The Owner shall provide for coordination of the activities of the Owner’s own forces and of each Separate Contractor with the Work of the Contractor, who shall cooperate with them. The Contractor shall participate with any Separate Contractors and the Owner in reviewing their construction schedules when directed to do so. The Contractor shall make any revisions to its construction schedule and Contract Sum deemed necessary after a joint review and mutual agreement. § 6.1.4 Unless otherwise provided in the Contract Documents, when the Owner performs construction or operations related to the Project with the Owner’s own forces or with Separate Contractors, the Owner or its Separate Contractors shall have the same obligations and rights that the Contractor has under the Conditions of the Contract, including, without excluding others, those stated in Article 3, this Article 6, and Articles 10, 11, and 12. § 6.2 Mutual Responsibility § 6.2.1 The Contractor shall afford the Owner and Separate Contractors reasonable opportunity for introduction and storage of their materials and equipment and performance of their activities, and shall connect and coordinate the Contractor’s construction and operations with theirs as required by the Contract Documents. § 6.2.2 If part of the Contractor’s Work depends for proper execution or results upon construction or operations by the Owner or a Separate Contractor, the Contractor shall, prior to proceeding with that portion of the Work, promptly notify the Architect of known discrepancies or defects in the construction or operations by the Owner or Separate Contractor that would render it unsuitable for proper execution and results of the Contractor’s Work. 218 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 24 236480v1 Failure of the Contractor to notify the Architect of apparent discrepancies or defects prior to proceeding with the Work shall constitute an acknowledgment that the Owner’s or Separate Contractor’s completed or partially completed construction is fit and proper to receive the Contractor’s Work. The Contractor shall not be responsible for discrepancies or defects in the construction or operations by the Owner or Separate Contractor that are not then apparent or reasonably discoverable. § 6.2.3 The Contractor shall reimburse the Owner for costs the Owner incurs that are payable to a Separate Contractor because of the Contractor’s delays, improperly timed activities or defective construction. The Owner shall be responsible to the Contractor for costs the Contractor incurs because of a Separate Contractor’s delays, improperly timed activities, damage to the Work or defective construction. § 6.2.4 The Contractor shall promptly remedy damage that the Contractor wrongfully causes to completed or partially completed construction or to property of the Owner or Separate Contractor as provided in Section 10.2.5. § 6.2.5 The Owner and each Separate Contractor shall have the same responsibilities for cutting and patching as are described for the Contractor in Section 3.14. § 6.3 Owner’s Right to Clean Up If a dispute arises among the Contractor, Separate Contractors, and the Owner as to the responsibility under their respective contracts for maintaining the premises and surrounding area free from waste materials and rubbish, the Owner may clean up and the Architect, with twenty-four (24) hours written notice to the Contractor, will allocate the cost among those responsible. ARTICLE 7 CHANGES IN THE WORK § 7.1 General § 7.1.1 Changes in the Work may be accomplished after execution of the Contract, and without invalidating the Contract, by Change Order, Construction Change Directive or order for a minor change in the Work, subject to the limitations stated in this Article 7 and elsewhere in the Contract Documents. § 7.1.2 A Change Order shall be based upon agreement among the Owner, Contractor, and Architect. A Construction Change Directive requires agreement by the Owner and Architect and may or may not be agreed to by the Contractor. An order for a minor change in the Work may be issued by the Architect alone. § 7.1.3 Changes in the Work shall be performed under applicable provisions of the Contract Documents. The Contractor shall proceed promptly with changes in the Work, unless otherwise provided in the Change Order, Construction Change Directive, or order for a minor change in the Work. § 7.2 Change Orders § 7.2.1 A Change Order is a written instrument prepared by the Architect and signed by the Owner, Contractor, and Architect stating their agreement upon all of the following: .1 The change in the Work; .2 The amount of the adjustment, if any, in the Contract Sum; and .3 The extent of the adjustment, if any, in the Contract Time. § 7.3 Construction Change Directives § 7.3.1 A Construction Change Directive is a written order prepared by the Architect and signed by the Owner and Architect, directing a change in the Work and stating a proposed basis for the change prior to agreement on adjustment, if any, in the Contract Sum or Contract Time, or both. The Owner may by Construction Change Directive, without invalidating the Contract, order changes in the Work within the general scope of the Contract consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, the Contract Sum and Contract Time being adjusted accordingly. § 7.3.2 A Construction Change Directive shall be used in the absence of total agreement on the terms of a Change Order. 219 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 25 236480v1 § 7.3.3 The Construction Change Directive shall provide for an adjustment to the Contract Sum. The adjustment shall be based on one of the following methods: .1 Mutual acceptance of a lump sum properly itemized and supported by sufficient substantiating data to permit evaluation; .2 Unit prices stated in the Contract Documents or subsequently agreed upon; .3 Cost to be determined in a manner agreed upon by the parties and a mutually acceptable fixed or percentage fee; or .4 As provided in Section 7.3.4. The Architect’s determination, as specified above, shall not be less than the actual costs expended by the Contractor in performing the changed Work. If the Contractor believes the Architect’s determination is less than its actual costs (incurred or projected) in performing the Work, the Contractor may initiate dispute resolution procedures pursuant to Article 15. § 7.3.4 If the Contractor does not respond promptly or disagrees with the method for adjustment in the Contract Sum, the Architect shall determine the adjustment on the basis of reasonable expenditures and savings of those performing the Work attributable to the change, including, in case of an increase in the Contract Sum, an amount for overhead and profit as set forth in the Agreement, or if no such amount is set forth in the Agreement, a reasonable amount. In such case, and also under Section 7.3.3.3, the Contractor shall keep and present, in such form as the Architect may prescribe, an itemized accounting together with appropriate supporting data. Unless otherwise provided in the Contract Documents, costs for the purposes of this Section 7.3.4 shall be limited to the following: .1 Costs of labor, including applicable payroll taxes, fringe benefits required by agreement or custom, workers’ compensation insurance, and other employee costs approved by the Architect; .2 Costs of materials, supplies, and equipment, including cost of transportation, whether incorporated or consumed; .3 Rental costs of machinery and equipment, exclusive of hand tools, whether rented from the Contractor or others; .4 Costs of premiums for all bonds and insurance, permit fees, and sales, use, or similar taxes, directly related to the change; and .5 Costs of supervision and field office personnel directly attributable to the change. § 7.3.5 If the Contractor disagrees with the adjustment in the Contract Time, the Contractor may make a Claim in accordance with applicable provisions of Article 15. § 7.3.6 Upon receipt of a Construction Change Directive, the Contractor shall promptly proceed with the change in the Work involved and advise the Architect of the Contractor’s agreement or disagreement with the method, if any, provided in the Construction Change Directive for determining the proposed adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. § 7.3.7 A Construction Change Directive signed by the Contractor indicates the Contractor’s agreement therewith, including adjustment in Contract Sum and Contract Time or the method for determining them. Such agreement shall be effective immediately and shall be recorded as a Change Order. § 7.3.8 The amount of credit to be allowed by the Contractor to the Owner for a deletion or change that results in a net decrease in the Contract Sum shall be actual net cost as confirmed by the Architect. When both additions and credits covering related Work or substitutions are involved in a change, the allowance for overhead and profit shall be figured on the basis of net increase, if any, with respect to that change. § 7.3.9 Pending final determination of the total cost of a Construction Change Directive to the Owner, the Contractor may request payment for Work completed under the Construction Change Directive in Applications for Payment. The Architect will make an interim determination for purposes of monthly certification for payment for those costs and certify for payment the amount that the Architect determines, in the Architect’s professional judgment, to be reasonably justified. The Architect’s interim determination of cost shall adjust the Contract Sum on the same basis as a Change Order, subject to the right of either party to disagree and assert a Claim in accordance with Article 15. 220 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 26 236480v1 § 7.3.10 When the Owner and Contractor agree with a determination made by the Architect concerning the adjustments in the Contract Sum and Contract Time, or otherwise reach agreement upon the adjustments, such agreement shall be effective immediately and the Architect will prepare a Change Order. Change Orders may be issued for all or any part of a Construction Change Directive. § 7.4 Minor Changes in the Work The Owner may order minor changes in the Work that are consistent with the intent of the Contract Documents and do not involve an adjustment in the Contract Sum or an extension of the Contract Time. The Owner’s order for minor changes shall be in writing. If the Contractor believes that the proposed minor change in the Work will affect the Contract Sum or Contract Time, the Contractor shall notify the Owner and shall not proceed to implement the change in the Work. If the Contractor performs the Work set forth in the Owner’s order for a minor change without prior notice to the Owner that such change will affect the Contract Sum or Contract Time, the Contractor waives any adjustment to the Contract Sum or extension of the Contract Time, subject to the Contractor’s right to assert a claim for additional costs and/or time pursuant to Article 15. ARTICLE 8 TIME § 8.1 Definitions § 8.1.1 Unless otherwise provided, Contract Time is the period of time, including authorized adjustments, allotted in the Contract Documents for Substantial Completion of the Work. § 8.1.2 The date of commencement of the Work is the date established in the Agreement. § 8.1.3 The date of Substantial Completion is the date as established in Section 9.8. § 8.1.4 The term “day” as used in the Contract Documents shall mean calendar day unless otherwise specifically defined. § 8.2 Progress and Completion § 8.2.1 Time limits stated in the Contract Documents are of the essence of the Contract. § 8.2.2 The Contractor shall not knowingly, except by agreement or instruction of the Owner in writing, commence the Work prior to the effective date of insurance required to be furnished by the Contractor and Owner. § 8.2.3 The Contractor shall proceed expeditiously with adequate forces and shall achieve Substantial Completion within the Contract Time. § 8.3 Delays and Extensions of Time § 8.3.1 If the Contractor is delayed at any time in the commencement or progress of the Work (1) by changes ordered in the Work; (2) by labor disputes, fire, unusual delay in deliveries, unavoidable casualties, epidemics (including COVID-19), adverse governmental actions, adverse weather conditions documented in accordance with Section 15.1.6.2, or other causes beyond the Contractor’s control; (3) by delay authorized by the Owner pending mediation and binding dispute resolution; or (4) by other causes that the Contractor asserts, and the Architect determines, justify delay, then the Contract Time shall be reasonably extended for such reasonable time as the Architect may determine. § 8.3.2 Claims relating to time shall be made in accordance with applicable provisions of Article 15. § 8.3.3 This Section 8.3 does not preclude recovery of damages for delay by either party under other provisions of the Contract Documents. § 8.3.4 Force Majeure § 8.3.4.1 Events of “Force Majeure” shall consist of the following: Acts of God, unusual or severe weather events, acts of war, terrorist acts, riots or other civil unrest, newly announced or enacted governmental restrictions or other acts by governmental bodies (local, national or foreign), including but not limited to the imposition of tariffs or other trade restrictions, labor disputes (excluding disputes with laborers on the Project), labor shortages (including but not 221 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 27 236480v1 limited to the unavailability of qualified and properly trained labor forces), unavoidable material shortages, unusual transportation delays, unusual delays in obtaining necessary permits granted by applicable governmental authority, vandalism, fire, flood, earthquake or other natural disaster or any other casualty loss, or any other events beyond the reasonable control of the Contractor (except those set forth in Section 8.3.1). § 8.3.4.2 If the Contractor is delayed at any time in the commencement or progress of the Work by an event of Force Majeure, the Contractor shall provide written notice to the Owner within a reasonable time after the Contractor first recognizes the occurrence of any event of Force Majeure and has assessed its impact to the Project. In the event of Force Majeure, the Contract Time shall be extended on a day-for-day basis for the entire period of time associated with the event of Force Majeure, and the Contract Sum shall be increased by the amount attributable to the Force Majeure event by Change Order, subject to the Owner’s right to Object, pursue a Claim under Article 15, and a final determination of the Claim. § 8.3.4.3 Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the cumulative amount of all delays due to weather is ______ (___) days or less, the Contractor shall bear its additional expenses and the Owner will bear its extra expenses. The date of Substantial Completion established in this Agreement shall include this initial ______ (___) day period. If the cumulative amount of all delays due to weather exceeds ______ (___) days, the Contract Time shall be extended, and the Contract Sum shall be increased as set forth in Section 8.3.4.2, subject to the Owner’s right to object and pursue a claim under Article 15. § 8.3.4.4 If an unavoidable material shortage or delay in delivery occurs, the Contractor shall have the obligation to use commercially reasonable efforts to substitute the delayed material with material or comparable kind and quality, or to substitute or supplement the delivery method, as the case may be, provided the Contractor obtains the Owner’s prior consent, which shall not unreasonably be withheld. Anything to the contrary herein notwithstanding, if the Contractor substitutes the delayed material or substitutes or supplements the delivery method in accordance with this Section 8.3.4.4, and as a result the unavoidable material shortage or delay in delivery does not cause a delay to the critical path of the Work, then the unavoidable material shortage or delay in the delivery shall not be considered a Force Majeure event; provided, however, that any additional costs incurred by Contractor in avoiding such a delay shall be added to the Contract Sum by Change Order. ARTICLE 9 PAYMENTS AND COMPLETION § 9.1 Contract Sum § 9.1.1 The Contract Sum is stated in the Agreement and, including authorized adjustments, is the total amount payable by the Owner to the Contractor for performance of the Work under the Contract Documents. § 9.1.2 If unit prices are stated in the Contract Documents or subsequently agreed upon, and if quantities originally contemplated are materially changed so that application of such unit prices to the actual quantities causes substantial inequity to the Owner or Contractor, the applicable unit prices shall be equitably adjusted. § 9.2 Schedule of Values Where the Contract is based on a stipulated sum or Guaranteed Maximum Price, the Contractor shall submit a schedule of values to the Architect before the first Application for Payment, allocating the entire Contract Sum to the various portions of the Work. The schedule of values shall be prepared in the form, and supported by the data to substantiate its accuracy, required by the Architect. This schedule, unless objected to by the Architect, shall be used as a basis for reviewing the Contractor’s Applications for Payment. Any changes to the schedule of values shall be submitted to the Architect and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the Architect may require, and unless objected to by the Architect, shall be used as a basis for reviewing the Contractor’s subsequent Applications for Payment. § 9.3 Applications for Payment § 9.3.1 At least ten days before the date established for each progress payment, the Contractor shall submit to the Architect an itemized Application for Payment prepared in accordance with the schedule of values, if required under Section 9.2, for completed portions of the Work. The application shall be notarized, if required, and supported by all data substantiating the Contractor’s right to payment that the Owner or Architect require. 222 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 28 236480v1 § 9.3.1.1 As provided in Section 7.3.9, such applications may include requests for payment on account of changes in the Work that have been properly authorized by Construction Change Directives, or by determinations of the Architect, but not yet included in Change Orders. § 9.3.1.2 Owner shall make 95% progress payments on account of the Contract Price on the basis of Contractor’s Applications for Payment during performance of the Work. Upon final completion of the Work, Owner shall pay the remainder of the Contract Price. Minn. Stat. § 290.92 requires that the City of Chanhassen obtain a Withholding Affidavit for Contractors, Form IC-134, before making final payments to Contractors. This form needs to be submitted by the Contractor to the Minnesota Department of Revenue for approval. The form is used to receive certification from the state that the vendor has complied with the requirement to withhold and remit state withholding taxes for employee salaries paid. § 9.3.2 Unless otherwise provided in the Contract Documents, payments shall be made on account of materials and equipment delivered and suitably stored at the site for subsequent incorporation in the Work. Payment may similarly be made for materials and equipment suitably stored off the site at a location agreed upon in writing. Payment for materials and equipment stored on or off the site shall be conditioned upon compliance by the Contractor with procedures satisfactory to the Owner to establish the Owner’s title to such materials and equipment or otherwise protect the Owner’s interest, and shall include the costs of storage and transportation to the site for such materials and equipment stored off the site. § 9.3.3 The Contractor warrants that title to all Work covered by an Application for Payment will pass to the Owner no later than the time of payment. The Contractor further warrants that upon submittal of an Application for Payment all Work for which Certificates for Payment have been previously issued and payments received from the Owner shall, to the best of the Contractor’s knowledge, information, and belief, be free and clear of liens, claims, security interests, or encumbrances, in favor of the Contractor, Subcontractors, suppliers, or other persons or entities that provided labor, materials, and equipment relating to the Work. § 9.4 Certificates for Payment § 9.4.1 The Architect will, within seven days after receipt of the Contractor’s Application for Payment, either (1) issue to the Owner a Certificate for Payment in the full amount of the Application for Payment, with a copy to the Contractor; or (2) issue to the Owner a Certificate for Payment for such amount as the Architect determines is properly due, and notify the Contractor and Owner of the Architect’s reasons for withholding certification in part as provided in Section 9.5.1; or (3) withhold certification of the entire Application for Payment, and notify the Contractor and Owner of the Architect’s reason for withholding certification in whole as provided in Section 9.5.1. § 9.4.2 The issuance of a Certificate for Payment will constitute a representation by the Architect to the Owner, based on the Architect’s evaluation of the Work and the data in the Application for Payment, that the Work has progressed to the point indicated, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents, and that the Contractor is entitled to payment in the amount certified. The foregoing representations are subject to an evaluation of the Work for conformance with the Contract Documents upon Substantial Completion, to results of subsequent tests and inspections, to correction of minor deviations from the Contract Documents prior to completion, and to specific qualifications expressed by the Architect. However, the issuance of a Certificate for Payment will not be a representation that the Architect has (1) made exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work; (2) reviewed construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures; (3) reviewed copies of requisitions received from Subcontractors and suppliers and other data requested by the Owner to substantiate the Contractor’s right to payment; or (4) made examination to ascertain how or for what purpose the Contractor has used money previously paid on account of the Contract Sum. § 9.5 Decisions to Withhold Certification § 9.5.1 The Architect may withhold a Certificate for Payment in whole or in part, to the extent reasonably necessary to protect the Owner, if in the Architect’s opinion the representations to the Owner required by Section 9.4.2 cannot be made. If the Architect is unable to certify payment in the amount of the Application, the Architect will notify the Contractor and Owner as provided in Section 9.4.1. If the Contractor and Architect cannot agree on a revised amount, the Architect will promptly issue a Certificate for Payment for the amount for which the Architect is able to make such representations to the Owner. The Architect may also withhold a Certificate for Payment to such extent 223 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 29 236480v1 as may be necessary in the Architect’s opinion to protect the Owner from loss for which the Contractor is responsible, including loss resulting from acts and omissions described in Section 3.3.2, because of .1 defective Work not remedied; .2 third party claims filed, unless security acceptable to the Owner is provided by the Contractor; .3 failure of the Contractor to make payments to Subcontractors or suppliers for labor, materials or equipment; .4 damage to the Owner or a Separate Contractor; or .5 persistent failure to carry out the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. § 9.5.2 When either party disputes the Architect’s decision regarding a Certificate for Payment under Section 9.5.1, in whole or in part, that party may submit a Claim in accordance with Article 15. § 9.5.3 If the Architect withholds certification for payment under Section 9.5.1.3, the Owner may, at its option, issue joint checks to the Contractor and to any Subcontractor or materials or equipment suppliers to whom the Contractor failed to make payment for Work properly performed or material of equipment suitably delivered. If the Owner makes payments by joint check, the Owner shall notify the Architect and the Architect will reflect such payment on the next Certificate for Payment. § 9.5.4 If the Architect withholds certification for payment under Section 9.5.1.3, the Owner may, at its sole option, issue joint checks to the Contractor and to any Subcontractor or supplier to whom the Contractor failed to make payment for Work properly performed or material or equipment suitably delivered. If the Owner makes payments by joint check, the Owner shall notify the Architect and the Contractor shall reflect such payment on its next Application for Payment. § 9.6 Progress Payments § 9.6.1 After the Architect has issued a Certificate for Payment, the Owner shall make payment in the manner and within the time provided in the Contract Documents, and shall so notify the Architect. § 9.6.2 Prompt Payment to Subcontractors. In accordance with Minnesota law, the Contractor shall include, in all subcontracts and other agreements with its subcontractors and suppliers, a provision which requires the Contractor to pay any of its subcontractors and suppliers within 10 days of the Contractor’s receipt of payment from the Owner, for undisputed services or supplies provided by the subcontractor or supplier. The provision shall also include the requirement that the Contractor shall pay interest of one and one-half percent (1.5%) per month or any part of a month to the subcontractor or supplier on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor or supplier. The provision shall further provide that the minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10, for an unpaid balance of less than $100, the Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor or supplier, and a subcontractor or supplier who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the Contractor shall be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorneys’ fees, incurred in bringing the action. § 9.6.3 The Owner has the right to request written evidence from the Contractor that the Contractor has properly paid Subcontractors and suppliers amounts paid by the Owner to the Contractor for subcontracted Work. Neither the Owner nor Architect shall have an obligation to pay, or to see to the payment of money to, a Subcontractor or supplier, except as may otherwise be required by law. § 9.6.4 A Certificate for Payment, a progress payment, or partial or entire use or occupancy of the Project by the Owner shall not constitute acceptance of Work not in accordance with the Contract Documents. § 9.6.5 Unless the Contractor provides the Owner with a payment bond in the full penal sum of the Contract Sum, payments received by the Contractor for Work properly performed by Subcontractors or provided by suppliers shall be held by the Contractor for those Subcontractors or suppliers who performed Work or furnished materials, or both, under contract with the Contractor for which payment was made by the Owner. Nothing contained herein shall require money to be placed in a separate account and not commingled with money of the Contractor, create any 224 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 30 236480v1 fiduciary liability or tort liability on the part of the Contractor for breach of trust, or entitle any person or entity to an award of punitive damages against the Contractor for breach of the requirements of this provision. § 9.6.6 Provided the Owner has fulfilled its payment obligations under the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall defend and indemnify the Owner from all loss, liability, damage or expense, including reasonable attorney’s fees and litigation expenses, arising out of any lien claim or other claim for payment by any Subcontractor or supplier of any tier. Upon receipt of notice of a lien claim or other claim for payment, the Owner shall notify the Contractor. If approved by the applicable court, when required, the Contractor may substitute a surety bond for the property against which the lien or other claim for payment has been asserted. § 9.7 Failure of Payment If the Architect does not issue a Certificate for Payment, through no fault of the Contractor, within seven days after receipt of the Contractor’s Application for Payment, or if the Owner does not pay the Contractor within seven days after the date established in the Contract Documents, the amount certified by the Architect , then the Contractor may, upon seven additional days’ notice to the Owner and Architect, stop the Work until payment of the amount owing has been received. The Contract Time shall be extended appropriately and the Contract Sum shall be increased by the amount of the Contractor’s reasonable costs of shutdown, delay and start-up, plus interest as provided for in the Contract Documents. § 9.8 Substantial Completion § 9.8.1 Substantial Completion is the stage in the progress of the Work when the Work or designated portion thereof is sufficiently complete in accordance with the Contract Documents so that the Owner can occupy or utilize the Work for its intended use. § 9.8.2 When the Contractor considers that the Work, or a portion thereof which the Owner agrees to accept separately, is substantially complete, the Contractor shall prepare and submit to the Architect a list of items to be completed or corrected prior to final payment. Failure to include an item on such list does not alter the responsibility of the Contractor to complete all Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. § 9.8.3 Upon receipt of the Contractor’s list, the Architect will make an inspection to determine whether the Work or designated portion thereof is substantially complete. If the Architect’s inspection discloses any item, whether or not included on the Contractor’s list, which is not sufficiently complete in accordance with the Contract Documents so that the Owner can occupy or utilize the Work or designated portion thereof for its intended use, the Contractor shall, before issuance of the Certificate of Substantial Completion, complete or correct such item upon notification by the Architect. In such case, the Contractor shall then submit a request for another inspection by the Architect to determine Substantial Completion. § 9.8.4 When the Work or designated portion thereof is substantially complete, the Architect will prepare a Certificate of Substantial Completion that shall establish the date of Substantial Completion; establish responsibilities of the Owner and Contractor for security, maintenance, heat, utilities, damage to the Work and insurance; and fix the time within which the Contractor shall finish all items on the list accompanying the Certificate. Warranties required by the Contract Documents shall commence on the date of Substantial Completion of the Work or designated portion thereof unless otherwise provided in the Certificate of Substantial Completion. § 9.8.5 The Certificate of Substantial Completion shall be submitted to the Owner and Contractor for their written acceptance of responsibilities assigned to them in the Certificate. Upon such acceptance, and consent of surety if any, the Owner shall make payment of retainage. Such payment shall be adjusted for Work that is incomplete or not in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. § 9.9 Partial Occupancy or Use § 9.9.1 The Owner may occupy or use any completed or partially completed portion of the Work at any stage when such portion is designated by separate agreement with the Contractor, provided such occupancy or use is consented to by the insurer and authorized by public authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. Such partial occupancy or use may commence whether or not the portion is substantially complete, provided the Owner and Contractor have accepted in writing the responsibilities assigned to each of them for payments, retainage, if any, security, 225 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 31 236480v1 maintenance, heat, utilities, damage to the Work and insurance, and have agreed in writing concerning the period for correction of the Work and commencement of warranties required by the Contract Documents. When the Contractor considers a portion substantially complete, the Contractor shall prepare and submit a list to the Architect as provided under Section 9.8.2. Consent of the Contractor to partial occupancy or use shall not be unreasonably withheld. The stage of the progress of the Work shall be determined by written agreement between the Owner and Contractor or, if no agreement is reached, by decision of the Architect. For any partial occupancy or use, the Owner shall reduce retainage proportionately to the Contractor at the time of the partial occupancy or use. § 9.9.2 Immediately prior to such partial occupancy or use, the Owner, Contractor, and Architect shall jointly inspect the area to be occupied or portion of the Work to be used in order to determine and record the condition of the Work. § 9.9.3 Unless otherwise agreed upon, partial occupancy or use of a portion or portions of the Work shall not constitute acceptance of Work not complying with the requirements of the Contract Documents. § 9.10 Final Completion and Final Payment § 9.10.1 Upon receipt of the Contractor’s notice that the Work is ready for final inspection and acceptance and upon receipt of a final Application for Payment, the Architect will promptly make such inspection. When the Architect finds the Work acceptable under the Contract Documents and the Contract fully performed, the Architect will promptly issue a final Certificate for Payment stating that to the best of the Architect’s knowledge, information and belief, and on the basis of the Architect’s on-site visits and inspections, the Work has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents and that the entire balance found to be due the Contractor and noted in the final Certificate is due and payable. The Architect’s final Certificate for Payment will constitute a further representation that conditions listed in Section 9.10.2 as precedent to the Contractor’s being entitled to final payment have been fulfilled. § 9.10.2 Neither final payment nor any remaining retained percentage shall become due until the Contractor submits to the Architect (1) an affidavit that payrolls, bills for materials and equipment, and other indebtedness connected with the Work for which the Owner or the Owner’s property might be responsible or encumbered (less amounts withheld by Owner) have been paid or otherwise satisfied, (2) a certificate evidencing that insurance required by the Contract Documents to remain in force after final payment is currently in effect, (3) a written statement that the Contractor knows of no reason that the insurance will not be renewable to cover the period required by the Contract Documents, (4) consent of surety, if any, to final payment, (5) documentation of any special warranties, such as manufacturers’ warranties or specific Subcontractor warranties, and (6) if required by the Owner, other data establishing payment or satisfaction of obligations, such as receipts and releases and waivers of liens, claims, security interests, or encumbrances arising out of the Contract, to the extent and in such form as may be designated by the Owner. If a Subcontractor refuses to furnish a release or waiver required by the Owner, the Contractor may furnish a bond satisfactory to the Owner to indemnify the Owner against such lien, claim, security interest, or encumbrance. If a lien, claim, security interest, or encumbrance remains unsatisfied after payments are made, the Contractor shall refund to the Owner all money that the Owner may be compelled to pay in discharging the lien, claim, security interest, or encumbrance, including all costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees. § 9.10.3 If, after Substantial Completion of the Work, final completion thereof is materially delayed through no fault of the Contractor or by issuance of Change Orders affecting final completion, and the Architect so confirms, the Owner shall, upon application by the Contractor and certification by the Architect, and without terminating the Contract, make payment of the balance due for that portion of the Work fully completed, corrected, and accepted. If the remaining balance for Work not fully completed or corrected is less than retainage stipulated in the Contract Documents, and if bonds have been furnished, the written consent of the surety to payment of the balance due for that portion of the Work fully completed and accepted shall be submitted by the Contractor to the Architect prior to certification of such payment. Such payment shall be made under terms and conditions governing final payment, except that it shall not constitute a waiver of Claims. § 9.10.4 The making of final payment shall constitute a waiver of Claims by the Owner except those arising from .1 liens, Claims, security interests, or encumbrances arising out of the Contract and unsettled; .2 failure of the Work to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents; 226 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 32 236480v1 .3 terms of special warranties required by the Contract Documents; or .4 audits performed by the Owner, if permitted by the Contract Documents, after final payment. § 9.10.5 Acceptance of final payment by the Contractor, a Subcontractor, or a supplier, shall constitute a waiver of claims by that payee except those previously made in writing and identified by that payee as unsettled at the time of final Application for Payment. ARTICLE 10 PROTECTION OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY § 10.1 Safety Precautions and Programs The Contractor shall be responsible for initiating, maintaining, and supervising all safety precautions and programs in connection with the performance of the Contract. § 10.2 Safety of Persons and Property § 10.2.1 The Contractor shall take reasonable precautions for safety of, and shall provide reasonable protection to prevent damage, injury, or loss to .1 employees on the Work and other persons who may be affected thereby; .2 the Work and materials and equipment to be incorporated therein, whether in storage on or off the site, under care, custody, or control of the Contractor, a Subcontractor, or a Sub-subcontractor; and .3 other property at the site or adjacent thereto, such as trees, shrubs, lawns, walks, pavements, roadways, structures, and utilities not designated for removal, relocation, or replacement in the course of construction. § 10.2.2 The Contractor shall comply with, and give notices required by applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, codes, rules and regulations, and lawful orders of public authorities, bearing on safety of persons or property or their protection from damage, injury, or loss. § 10.2.3 The Contractor shall implement, erect, and maintain, as required by existing conditions and performance of the Contract, reasonable safeguards for safety and protection, including posting danger signs and other warnings against hazards; promulgating safety regulations; and notifying the owners and users of adjacent sites and utilities of the safeguards. § 10.2.4 When use or storage of explosives or other hazardous materials or equipment, or unusual methods are necessary for execution of the Work, the Contractor shall exercise utmost care and carry on such activities under supervision of properly qualified personnel. § 10.2.5 The Contractor shall promptly remedy damage and loss (other than damage or loss insured under property insurance required by the Contract Documents) to property referred to in Sections 10.2.1.2 and 10.2.1.3 caused in whole or in part by the Contractor, a Subcontractor, a Sub-subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them, or by anyone for whose acts they may be liable and for which the Contractor is responsible under Sections 10.2.1.2 and 10.2.1.3. The Contractor may make a Claim for the cost to remedy the damage or loss to the extent such damage or loss is attributable to acts or omissions of the Owner or Architect or anyone directly or indirectly employed by either of them, or by anyone for whose acts either of them may be liable, and not attributable to the fault or negligence of the Contractor. The foregoing obligations of the Contractor are in addition to the Contractor’s obligations under Section 3.18. § 10.2.6 The Contractor shall designate a responsible member of the Contractor’s organization at the site whose duty shall be the prevention of accidents. This person shall be the Contractor’s superintendent unless otherwise designated by the Contractor in writing to the Owner and Architect. § 10.2.7 The Contractor shall not permit any part of the construction or site to be loaded so as to cause damage or create an unsafe condition. § 10.2.8 To the extent that Owner continues to occupy any part of the Project site or adjacent property during construction, Owner shall be responsible for keeping its employees, invitees and other persons under its control out of the Project site. 227 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 33 236480v1 § 10.2.9 Injury or Damage to Person or Property If either party suffers injury or damage to person or property because of an act or omission of the other party, or of others for whose acts such party is legally responsible, notice of the injury or damage, whether or not insured, shall be given to the other party within a reasonable time not exceeding 21 days after discovery. The notice shall provide sufficient detail to enable the other party to investigate the matter. § 10.3 Hazardous Materials and Substances § 10.3.1 The Contractor is responsible for compliance with any requirements included in the Contract Documents regarding hazardous materials or substances. If the Contractor encounters a material or substance, including but not limited to asbestos or polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB), the Contractor shall, upon recognizing the condition, immediately stop Work in the affected area and notify the Owner and Architect of the condition. Nothing in this Section 10.3 or elsewhere in this contract shall be construed as a requirement that the Contractor perform any Work relating to a hazardous substance or material unless expressly required by the Contract Documents. § 10.3.2 Upon receipt of the Contractor’s notice, the Owner shall obtain the services of a licensed laboratory to verify the presence or absence of the material or substance reported by the Contractor and, in the event such material or substance is found to be present, to cause it to be rendered harmless. Unless otherwise required by the Contract Documents, the Owner shall furnish in writing to the Contractor and Architect the names and qualifications of persons or entities who are to perform tests verifying the presence or absence of the material or substance or who are to perform the task of removal or safe containment of the material or substance. The Contractor and the Architect will promptly reply to the Owner in writing stating whether or not either has reasonable objection to the persons or entities proposed by the Owner. If either the Contractor or Architect has an objection to a person or entity proposed by the Owner, the Owner shall propose another to whom the Contractor and the Architect have no reasonable objection. When the material or substance has been rendered harmless, Work in the affected area shall resume upon written agreement of the Owner and Contractor. By Change Order, the Contract Time shall be extended appropriately and the Contract Sum shall be increased by the amount of the Contractor’s reasonable additional costs of shutdown, delay, and start-up. § 10.3.3 To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Owner shall indemnify and hold harmless the Contractor, Subcontractors, Architect, Architect’s consultants, and agents and employees of any of them from and against claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees, arising out of or resulting from performance of the Work in the affected area if in fact the material or substance presents the risk of bodily injury or death as described in Section 10.3.1 and has not been rendered harmless, provided that such claim, damage, loss, or expense is attributable to bodily injury, sickness, disease or death, or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the Work itself), except to the extent that such damage, loss, or expense is due to the fault or negligence of the party seeking indemnity. § 10.3.4 The Owner shall not be responsible under this Section 10.3 for hazardous materials or substances the Contractor brings to the site unless such materials or substances are required by the Contract Documents. The Owner shall be responsible for hazardous materials or substances required by the Contract Documents, except to the extent of the Contractor’s fault or negligence in the use and handling of such materials or substances. § 10.3.5 The Contractor shall reimburse the Owner for the cost and expense the Owner incurs (1) for remediation of hazardous materials or substances the Contractor brings to the site and negligently handles, or (2) where the Contractor fails to perform its obligations under Section 10.3.1, except to the extent that the cost and expense are due to the Owner’s fault or negligence. § 10.3.6 If, without negligence on the part of the Contractor, the Contractor is held liable by a government agency for the cost of remediation of a hazardous material or substance by reason of performing Work as required by the Contract Documents, the Owner shall reimburse the Contractor for all cost and expense thereby incurred, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 228 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 34 236480v1 § 10.4 Emergencies In an emergency affecting safety of persons or property, the Contractor shall act, at the Contractor’s discretion, to prevent threatened damage, injury, or loss. Additional compensation or extension of time claimed by the Contractor on account of an emergency shall be determined as provided in Article 15 and Article 7. ARTICLE 11 INSURANCE AND BONDS § 11.1 Contractor’s Insurance and Bonds § 11.1.1 The Contractor shall purchase and maintain insurance of the types and limits of liability, containing the endorsements, and subject to the terms and conditions, as described in the Agreement or elsewhere in the Contract Documents. The Contractor shall purchase and maintain the required insurance from an insurance company or insurance companies lawfully authorized to issue insurance in the jurisdiction where the Project is located. The Owner, Architect, and Architect’s consultants shall be named as additional insureds under the Contractor’s commercial general liability policy or as otherwise described in the Contract Documents. § 11.1.2 The Contractor shall provide surety bonds of the types, for such penal sums, and subject to such terms and conditions as required by the Contract Documents. The Contractor shall purchase and maintain the required bonds from a company or companies lawfully authorized to issue surety bonds in the jurisdiction where the Project is located. § 11.1.3 Upon the request of any person or entity appearing to be a potential beneficiary of bonds covering payment of obligations arising under the Contract, the Contractor shall promptly furnish a copy of the bonds or shall authorize a copy to be furnished. § 11.1.4 Notice of Cancellation or Expiration of Contractor’s Required Insurance. Within three (3) business days of the date the Contractor becomes aware of an impending or actual cancellation or expiration of any insurance required by the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall provide notice to the Owner of such impending or actual cancellation or expiration. Upon receipt of notice from the Contractor, the Owner shall, unless the lapse in coverage arises from an act or omission of the Owner, have the right to stop the Work until the lapse in coverage has been cured by the procurement of replacement coverage by the Contractor. The furnishing of notice by the Contractor shall not relieve the Contractor of any contractual obligation to provide any required coverage. 229 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 35 236480v1 § 11.2 Owner’s Insurance § 11.2.1 The Owner shall purchase and maintain insurance of the types and limits of liability, containing the endorsements, and subject to the terms and conditions, as described in the Agreement or elsewhere in the Contract Documents. The Owner shall purchase and maintain the required insurance from an insurance company or insurance companies lawfully authorized to issue insurance in the jurisdiction where the Project is located. § 11.2.2 Failure to Purchase Required Property Insurance. If the Owner fails to purchase and maintain the required property insurance, with all of the coverages and in the amounts described in the Agreement or elsewhere in the Contract Documents, the Owner shall inform the Contractor in writing prior to commencement of the Work. Upon receipt of notice from the Owner, the Contractor may delay commencement of the Work and may obtain insurance that will protect the interests of the Contractor, Subcontractors, and Sub-Subcontractors in the Work. When the failure to provide coverage has been cured or resolved, the Contract Sum and Contract Time shall be equitably adjusted. In the event the Owner fails to procure coverage, the Owner waives all rights against the Contractor, Subcontractors, and Sub-subcontractors to the extent the loss to the Owner would have been covered by the insurance to have been procured by the Owner. The cost of the insurance shall be charged to the Owner by a Change Order. If the Owner does not provide written notice, and the Contractor is damaged by the failure or neglect of the Owner to purchase or maintain the required insurance, the Owner shall reimburse the Contractor for all reasonable costs and damages attributable thereto. § 11.2.3 Notice of Cancellation or Expiration of Owner’s Required Property Insurance. Within three (3) business days of the date the Owner becomes aware of an impending or actual cancellation or expiration of any property insurance required by the Contract Documents, the Owner shall provide notice to the Contractor of such impending or actual cancellation or expiration. Unless the lapse in coverage arises from an act or omission of the Contractor: (1) the Contractor, upon receipt of notice from the Owner, shall have the right to stop the Work until the lapse in coverage has been cured by the procurement of replacement coverage by either the Owner or the Contractor; (2) the Contract Time and Contract Sum shall be equitably adjusted; and (3) the Owner waives all rights against the Contractor, Subcontractors, and Sub-subcontractors to the extent any loss to the Owner would have been covered by the insurance had it not expired or been cancelled. If the Contractor purchases replacement coverage, the cost of the insurance shall be charged to the Owner by an appropriate Change Order. The furnishing of notice by the Owner shall not relieve the Owner of any contractual obligation to provide required insurance. § 11.3 Waivers of Subrogation § 11.3.1 The Owner and Contractor waive all rights against (1) each other and any of their subcontractors, sub- subcontractors, agents, and employees, each of the other; (2) the Architect and Architect’s consultants; and (3) Separate Contractors, if any, and any of their subcontractors, sub-subcontractors, agents, and employees, for damages caused by fire, or other causes of loss, to the extent those losses are covered by property insurance required by the Agreement or other property insurance applicable to the Project or to the completed project or structure, or to the property adjacent to the Project site, except such rights as they have to proceeds of such insurance. The Owner or Contractor, as appropriate, shall require similar written waivers in favor of the individuals and entities identified above from the Architect, Architect’s consultants, Separate Contractors, subcontractors, and sub-subcontractors. The policies of insurance purchased and maintained by each person or entity agreeing to waive claims pursuant to this Section 11.3.1 shall not prohibit this waiver of subrogation. This waiver of subrogation shall be effective as to a person or entity (1) even though that person or entity would otherwise have a duty of indemnification, contractual or otherwise, (2) even though that person or entity did not pay the insurance premium directly or indirectly, or (3) whether or not the person or entity had an insurable interest in the damaged property. This Section 11.3.1 is expressly amended to allow Contractor to subrogate against Contractor’s own subcontractors at any tier. § 11.3.2 [Not Used.] § 11.4 Loss of Use, Business Interruption, and Delay in Completion Insurance The Owner, at the Owner’s option, may purchase and maintain insurance that will protect the Owner against loss of use of the Owner’s property, or the inability to conduct normal operations, due to fire or other causes of loss. The Owner waives all rights of action against the Contractor and Architect for loss of use of the Owner’s property, due to fire or other hazards however caused. 230 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 36 236480v1 §11.5 Adjustment and Settlement of Insured Loss § 11.5.1 A loss insured under the property insurance required by the Agreement shall be adjusted by the Owner as fiduciary and made payable to the Owner as fiduciary for the insureds, as their interests may appear, subject to requirements of any applicable mortgagee clause and of Section 11.5.2. The Owner shall pay the Architect and Contractor their just shares of insurance proceeds received by the Owner, and by appropriate agreements the Architect and Contractor shall make payments to their consultants and Subcontractors in similar manner. § 11.5.2 Prior to settlement of an insured loss, the Owner shall notify the Contractor of the terms of the proposed settlement as well as the proposed allocation of the insurance proceeds. The Contractor shall have 14 days from receipt of notice to object to the proposed settlement or allocation of the proceeds. If the Contractor does not object, the Owner shall settle the loss and the Contractor shall be bound by the settlement and allocation. Upon receipt, the Owner shall deposit the insurance proceeds in a separate account and make the appropriate distributions. Thereafter, if no other agreement is made or the Owner does not terminate the Contract for convenience, the Owner and Contractor shall execute a Change Order for reconstruction of the damaged or destroyed Work in the amount allocated for that purpose. If the Contractor timely objects to either the terms of the proposed settlement or the allocation of the proceeds, the Owner may proceed to settle the insured loss, and any dispute between the Owner and Contractor arising out of the settlement or allocation of the proceeds shall be resolved pursuant to Article 15. Pending resolution of any dispute, the Owner may issue a Construction Change Directive for the reconstruction of the damaged or destroyed Work. ARTICLE 12 UNCOVERING AND CORRECTION OF WORK § 12.1 Uncovering of Work § 12.1.1 If a portion of the Work is covered contrary to the Architect’s request or to requirements specifically expressed in the Contract Documents, it must, if requested in writing by the Architect, be uncovered for the Architect’s examination and be replaced at the Contractor’s expense without change in the Contract Time. § 12.1.2 If a portion of the Work has been covered that the Architect has not specifically requested to examine prior to its being covered, the Architect may request to see such Work and it shall be uncovered by the Contractor. If such Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall be entitled to an equitable adjustment to the Contract Sum and Contract Time as may be appropriate. If such Work is not in accordance with the Contract Documents, the costs of uncovering the Work, and the cost of correction, shall be at the Contractor’s expense. § 12.2 Correction of Work § 12.2.1 Before Substantial Completion The Contractor shall promptly correct Work rejected by the Architect or failing to conform to the requirements of the Contract Documents, discovered before Substantial Completion and whether or not fabricated, installed or completed. Costs of correcting such rejected Work, including additional testing and inspections, the cost of uncovering and replacement, and compensation for the Architect’s services and expenses made necessary thereby, shall be at the Contractor’s expense. In addition, the Owner shall promptly remedy damage and loss arising in conjunction with the Project caused in whole or in part by the Architect, their consultants, any engineer hired by the Owner, and/or by any other contractor under contract with the Owner or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any such party, or anyone for whose acts such parties may be liable. § 12.2.2 After Substantial Completion § 12.2.2.1 In addition to the Contractor’s obligations under Section 3.5, if, within one year after the date of Substantial Completion of the Work or designated portion thereof or after the date for commencement of warranties established under Section 9.9.1, or by terms of any applicable special warranty required by the Contract Documents, any of the Work is found to be not in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall correct it promptly after receipt of notice from the Owner to do so, unless the Owner has previously given the Contractor a written acceptance of such condition. The Owner shall give such notice promptly after discovery of the condition. During the one-year period for correction of Work and to make a claim for breach of warranty, if the Owner fails to notify the Contractor and give the Contractor an opportunity to make the correction, the Owner waives the rights to require correction by the Contractor. If the Contractor fails to correct nonconforming Work within a reasonable time during that period after receipt of notice from the Owner or Architect, the Owner may correct it in accordance with Section 2.5. 231 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 37 236480v1 § 12.2.2.2 The one-year period for correction of Work shall be extended with respect to portions of Work first performed after Substantial Completion by the period of time between Substantial Completion and the actual completion of that portion of the Work. § 12.2.2.3 The one-year period for correction of Work shall not be extended by corrective Work performed by the Contractor pursuant to this Section 12.2. § 12.2.3 The Contractor shall remove from the site portions of the Work that are not in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents and are neither corrected by the Contractor nor accepted by the Owner. § 12.3 Acceptance of Nonconforming Work If the Owner prefers to accept Work that is not in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents, the Owner may do so instead of requiring its removal and correction, in which case the Contract Sum will be reduced as appropriate and equitable. Such adjustment shall be effected whether or not final payment has been made. ARTICLE 13 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS § 13.1 Governing Law The Contract shall be governed by the law of the place where the Project is located. § 13.2 Successors and Assigns § 13.2.1 The Owner and Contractor respectively bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives to covenants, agreements, and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. Except as provided in Section 13.2.2, neither party to the Contract shall assign the Contract as a whole without written consent of the other. If either party attempts to make an assignment without such consent, that party shall nevertheless remain legally responsible for all obligations under the Contract. § 13.2.2 The Owner may, without consent of the Contractor, assign the Contract to a lender providing construction financing for the Project, if the lender assumes the Owner’s rights and obligations under the Contract Documents, including those obligations incurred prior to the date of the assignment. The Contractor shall execute all consents reasonably required to facilitate the assignment. § 13.3 Rights and Remedies § 13.3.1 Duties and obligations imposed by the Contract Documents and rights and remedies available thereunder shall be in addition to and not a limitation of duties, obligations, rights, and remedies otherwise imposed or available by law. § 13.3.2 No action or failure to act by the Owner, Architect, or Contractor shall constitute a waiver of a right or duty afforded them under the Contract, nor shall such action or failure to act constitute approval of or acquiescence in a breach thereunder, except as may be specifically agreed upon in writing. § 13.4 Tests and Inspections § 13.4.1 Tests, inspections, and approvals of portions of the Work shall be made as required by the Contract Documents and by applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, codes, rules, and regulations or lawful orders of public authorities. Unless otherwise provided, the Contractor shall make arrangements for such tests, inspections, and approvals with an entity acceptable to the Owner, or with the appropriate public authority, and shall bear all related costs of tests, inspections, and approvals as provided for in the Contract Documents. The Contractor shall give the Architect timely notice of when and where tests and inspections are to be made so that the Architect may be present for such procedures. The Owner shall bear costs of tests, inspections, or approvals that do not become requirements until after bids are received or negotiations concluded. The Owner shall directly arrange and pay for tests, inspections, or approvals where building codes or applicable laws or regulations so require. § 13.4.2 If the Architect, Owner, or public authorities having jurisdiction determine that portions of the Work require additional testing, inspection, or approval not included under Section 13.4.1, the Architect will, upon written authorization from the Owner, instruct the Contractor to make arrangements for such additional testing, inspection, 232 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 38 236480v1 or approval, by an entity acceptable to the Owner, and the Contractor shall give timely notice to the Architect of when and where tests and inspections are to be made so that the Architect may be present for such procedures. Such costs, except as provided in Section 13.4.3, shall be at the Owner’s expense. § 13.4.3 If procedures for testing, inspection, or approval under Sections 13.4.1 and 13.4.2 reveal failure of the portions of the Work to comply with requirements established by the Contract Documents, all costs made necessary by such failure, including those of repeated procedures and compensation for the Architect’s services and expenses, shall be at the Contractor’s expense. § 13.4.4 Required certificates of testing, inspection, or approval shall, unless otherwise required by the Contract Documents, be secured by the Contractor and promptly delivered to the Architect. § 13.4.5 If the Architect is to observe tests, inspections, or approvals required by the Contract Documents, the Architect will do so promptly and, where practicable, at the normal place of testing. § 13.4.6 Tests or inspections conducted pursuant to the Contract Documents shall be made promptly to avoid unreasonable delay in the Work. § 13.5 Interest Payments due and unpaid under the Contract Documents shall bear interest from the date payment is due at the rate the parties agree upon in writing or, in the absence thereof, at the legal rate prevailing from time to time at the place where the Project is located. ARTICLE 14 TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF THE CONTRACT § 14.1 Termination by the Contractor § 14.1.1 The Contractor may terminate the Contract if the Work is stopped for a period of 30 consecutive days through no act or fault of the Contractor, a Subcontractor, a Sub-subcontractor, their agents or employees, or any other persons or entities performing portions of the Work, for any of the following reasons: .1 Issuance of an order of a court or other public authority having jurisdiction that requires all Work to be stopped; .2 An act of government, such as a declaration of national emergency, that requires all Work to be stopped; or .3 Because the Architect has not issued a Certificate for Payment and has not notified the Contractor of the reason for withholding certification as provided in Section 9.4.1, or because the Owner has not made payment on a Certificate for Payment within the time stated in the Contract Documents. § 14.1.2 The Contractor may terminate the Contract if, through no act or fault of the Contractor, a Subcontractor, a Sub-subcontractor, their agents or employees, or any other persons or entities performing portions of the Work, persistent suspensions, delays, or interruptions of the entire Work by the Owner as described in Section 14.3, constitute in the aggregate more than 100 percent of the total number of days scheduled for completion, or 60 days in any 365-day period, whichever is less. § 14.1.3 If one of the reasons described in Section 14.1.1 or 14.1.2 exists, the Contractor may, upon seven days’ notice to the Owner and Architect, terminate the Contract and recover from the Owner payment for Work executed, as well as reasonable overhead and profit on Work not executed, and costs incurred by reason of such termination. § 14.1.4 If the Work is stopped for a period of 60 consecutive days through no act or fault of the Contractor, a Subcontractor, a Sub-subcontractor, or their agents or employees or any other persons or entities performing portions of the Work because the Owner has persistently failed to fulfill the Owner’s obligations under the Contract Documents with respect to matters important to the progress of the Work, the Contractor may, upon seven additional days’ notice to the Owner and the Architect, terminate the Contract and recover from the Owner as provided in Section 14.1.3. 233 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 39 236480v1 § 14.2 Termination by the Owner for Cause § 14.2.1 The Owner may terminate the Contract if the Contractor .1 persistently refuses or fails to supply enough properly skilled workers or proper materials; .2 fails to make payment to Subcontractors or suppliers in accordance with the respective agreements between the Contractor and the Subcontractors or suppliers; .3 persistently disregards applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, codes, rules and regulations, or lawful orders of a public authority; or .4 otherwise is guilty of substantial breach of a provision of the Contract Documents. § 14.2.2 When any of the reasons described in Section 14.2.1 exist, and upon certification by the Architect that sufficient cause exists to justify such action, the Owner may, without prejudice to any other rights or remedies of the Owner and after giving the Contractor and the Contractor’s surety, if any, seven days’ notice, terminate employment of the Contractor and may, subject to any prior rights of the surety: .1 Exclude the Contractor from the site and take possession of all materials, equipment, tools, and construction equipment and machinery thereon owned by the Contractor; .2 Accept assignment of subcontracts pursuant to Section 5.4; and .3 Finish the Work by whatever reasonable method the Owner may deem expedient. Upon written request of the Contractor, the Owner shall furnish to the Contractor a detailed accounting of the costs incurred by the Owner in finishing the Work. § 14.2.3 When the Owner terminates the Contract for one of the reasons stated in Section 14.2.1, the Contractor shall not be entitled to receive further payment until the Work is finished. § 14.2.4 If the unpaid balance of the Contract Sum exceeds costs of finishing the Work, including compensation for the Architect’s services and expenses made necessary thereby, and other damages incurred by the Owner and not expressly waived, such excess shall be paid to the Contractor. If such costs and damages exceed the unpaid balance, the Contractor shall pay the difference to the Owner. The amount to be paid to the Contractor or Owner, as the case may be, shall be certified by the Initial Decision Maker, upon application, and this obligation for payment shall survive termination of the Contract. § 14.3 Suspension by the Owner for Convenience § 14.3.1 The Owner may, without cause, order the Contractor in writing to suspend, delay or interrupt the Work, in whole or in part for such period of time as the Owner may determine. § 14.3.2 The Contract Sum and Contract Time shall be adjusted for increases in the cost and time caused by suspension, delay, or interruption under Section 14.3.1. Adjustment of the Contract Sum shall include profit. No adjustment shall be made to the extent .1 that performance is, was, or would have been, so suspended, delayed, or interrupted, by another cause for which the Contractor is responsible; or .2 that an equitable adjustment is made or denied under another provision of the Contract. § 14.4 Termination by the Owner for Convenience § 14.4.1 The Owner may, at any time, terminate the Contract for the Owner’s convenience and without cause. § 14.4.2 Upon receipt of notice from the Owner of such termination for the Owner’s convenience, the Contractor shall .1 cease operations as directed by the Owner in the notice; .2 take actions necessary, or that the Owner may direct, for the protection and preservation of the Work; and .3 except for Work directed to be performed prior to the effective date of termination stated in the notice, terminate all existing subcontracts and purchase orders and enter into no further subcontracts and purchase orders. § 14.4.3 In case of such termination for the Owner’s convenience, the Owner shall pay the Contractor for Work properly executed up to the date of termination; costs incurred by reason of the termination, including costs 234 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 40 236480v1 attributable to termination of Subcontracts; and reasonable overhead and profit on work not executed. The payments referenced in this paragraph are not the exclusive remedy of the Contractor. Such payments are instead cumulative of any other rights, claims, or entitlements the Contractor may possess, including but not limited to, claims arising out of a breach of the Agreement by the Owner prior to termination for convenience, claims arising from some other provision of the Agreement or these General Conditions, and/or claims arising under common law. ARTICLE 15 CLAIMS AND DISPUTES § 15.1 Claims § 15.1.1 Definition A Claim is a demand or assertion by one of the parties seeking, as a matter of right, payment of money, a change in the Contract Time, or other relief with respect to the terms of the Contract. The term “Claim” also includes other disputes and matters in question between the Owner and Contractor arising out of or relating to the Contract. The responsibility to substantiate Claims shall rest with the party making the Claim. § 15.1.2 Time Limits on Claims The Owner and Contractor shall commence all Claims and causes of action against the other and arising out of or related to the Contract, whether in contract, tort, breach of warranty or otherwise, in accordance with the requirements of the binding dispute resolution method selected in the Agreement and within the period specified by applicable law, but in any case not more than 10 years after the date of Substantial Completion of the Work. The Owner and Contractor waive all Claims and causes of action not commenced in accordance with this Section 15.1.2. § 15.1.3 Notice of Claims § 15.1.3.1 Claims by either the Owner or Contractor, where the condition giving rise to the Claim is first discovered prior to expiration of the period for correction of the Work set forth in Section 12.2.2, shall be initiated by notice to the other party and to the Initial Decision Maker with a copy sent to the Architect, if the Architect is not serving as the Initial Decision Maker. Claims by either party under this Section 15.1.3.1 shall be initiated within 21 days after occurrence of the event giving rise to such Claim or within 21 days after the claimant first recognizes the condition giving rise to the Claim, whichever is later. § 15.1.3.2 Claims by either the Owner or Contractor, where the condition giving rise to the Claim is first discovered after expiration of the period for correction of the Work set forth in Section 12.2.2, shall be initiated by notice to the other party. In such event, no decision by the Initial Decision Maker is required. § 15.1.4 Continuing Contract Performance § 15.1.4.1 Pending final resolution of a Claim, except as otherwise agreed in writing or as provided in Section 9.7 and Article 14, the Contractor shall proceed diligently with performance of the Contract and the Owner shall continue to make payments in accordance with the Contract Documents. § 15.1.4.2 The Contract Sum and Contract Time shall be adjusted in accordance with the Initial Decision Maker’s decision, subject to the right of either party to proceed in accordance with this Article 15. The Architect will issue Certificates for Payment in accordance with the decision of the Initial Decision Maker. § 15.1.5 Claims for Additional Cost If the Contractor wishes to make a Claim for an increase in the Contract Sum, notice as provided in Section 15.1.3 shall be given before proceeding to execute the portion of the Work that is the subject of the Claim. Prior notice is not required for Claims relating to an emergency endangering life or property arising under Section 10.4. § 15.1.6 Claims for Additional Time § 15.1.6.1 If the Contractor wishes to make a Claim for an increase in the Contract Time, notice as provided in Section 15.1.3 shall be given. The Contractor’s Claim shall include an estimate of cost and of probable effect of delay on progress of the Work. In the case of a continuing delay, only one Claim is necessary. § 15.1.6.2 If adverse weather conditions are the basis for a Claim for additional time, such Claim shall be documented by data substantiating that weather conditions were abnormal for the period of time and had an adverse effect on the scheduled construction. 235 AIA Document A201™ – 2017. Copyright © 1911, 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1987, 1997, 2007 and 2017 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 17:32:46 on 05/23/2018 under Order No.0592519708 which expires on 09/21/2018, and is not for resale. User Notes: (1834570617) 41 236480v1 § 15.1.7 Waiver of Claims for Consequential Damages The Contractor and Owner waive Claims against each other for consequential damages arising out of or relating to this Contract. This mutual waiver includes but is not limited to .1 damages incurred by the Owner for rental expenses, for losses of use, income, profit, diminution in value, financing, business and reputation, and for loss of management or employee productivity or of the services of such persons; and .2 damages for losses of financing, business and reputation, and for loss of profit, except anticipated profit arising directly from the Work. This mutual waiver is applicable, without limitation, to all consequential damages due to either party’s termination in accordance with Article 14. Nothing contained in this Section 15.1.7 shall be deemed to preclude assessment of liquidated damages, when applicable, in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. § 15.2 [Not Used.] § 15.3 Mediation § 15.3.1 Claims, disputes, or other matters in controversy arising out of or related to the Contract, except those waived as provided for in Sections 9.10.4, 9.10.5, and 15.1.7, shall be subject to mediation as a condition precedent to binding dispute resolution. § 15.3.2 The parties shall endeavor to resolve their Claims by mediation which, unless the parties mutually agree otherwise, shall be administered by the American Arbitration Association in accordance with its Construction Industry Mediation Procedures in effect on the date of the Agreement. A request for mediation shall be made in writing, delivered to the other party to the Contract, and filed with the person or entity administering the mediation. The request may be made concurrently with the filing of binding dispute resolution proceedings but, in such event, mediation shall proceed in advance of binding dispute resolution proceedings, which shall be stayed pending mediation for a period of 60 days from the date of filing, unless stayed for a longer period by agreement of the parties or court order. If an arbitration is stayed pursuant to this Section 15.3.2, the parties may nonetheless proceed to the selection of the arbitrator(s) and agree upon a schedule for later proceedings. § 15.3.3 The parties shall share the mediator’s fee and any filing fees equally. The mediation shall be held in the place where the Project is located, unless another location is mutually agreed upon. Signed agreements reached in mediation shall be enforceable as settlement agreements in any court having jurisdiction thereof. § 15.4 Arbitration [Not Used.] § 16.1 Data Practices The Contractor must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the Owner pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used maintained, or disseminated by the Contractor pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event the Contractor receives a request to release data, the Contractor must immediately notify the Owner. The Owner will give the Contractor instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the Owner, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Contractor’s officers’, agents’, owners’, partners’, employees’, volunteers’ assignees’ or subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this section shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 236 AIA® Document A133TM – 2019 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager at Risk where the basis of payment is the Cost of the Work Plus a Fee with a Guaranteed Maximum Price AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 1 235737v2 ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS: The author of this document has added information needed for its completion. The author may also have revised the text of the original AIA standard form. An Additions and Deletions Report that notes added information as well as revisions to the standard form text is available from the author and should be reviewed. This document has important legal consequences. Consultation with an attorney is encouraged with respect to its completion or modification. AIA Document A201™–2017, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, is adopted in this document by reference. Do not use with other general conditions unless this document is modified. ELECTRONIC COPYING of any portion of this AIA® Document to another electronic file is prohibited and constitutes a violation of copyright laws as set forth in the footer of this document. AGREEMENT made as of the « » day of « » in the year «Two Thousand Twenty-four » (In words, indicate day, month, and year.) BETWEEN the Owner: (Name, legal status, address, and other information) «City of Chanhassen » «7700 Market Blvd. » «PO Box 147 » «Chanhassen, MN 55317 » and the Construction Manager: (Name, legal status, address, and other information) «RJM Construction, LLC »« » «830 Boone Avenue N. » «Golden Valley, MN 55427 » for the following Project: (Name, location, and detailed description) «Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center » «Hwy 212 & Powers Blvd » «Chanhassen, MN 55317 » « » The Architect: (Name, legal status, address, and other information) «BKV Group » «222 North Second Street » «Long & Kees Bldg, Suite 101 » «Minneapolis, MN 55401 » The Owner and Construction Manager agree as follows. 237 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 2 235737v2 TABLE OF ARTICLES 1 INITIAL INFORMATION 2 GENERAL PROVISIONS 3 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER’S RESPONSIBILITIES 4 OWNER’S RESPONSIBILITIES 5 COMPENSATION AND PAYMENTS FOR PRECONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES 6 COMPENSATION FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES 7 COST OF THE WORK FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE 8 DISCOUNTS, REBATES, AND REFUNDS 9 SUBCONTRACTS AND OTHER AGREEMENTS 10 ACCOUNTING RECORDS 11 PAYMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES 12 DISPUTE RESOLUTION 13 TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION 14 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 15 SCOPE OF THE AGREEMENT EXHIBIT A GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE AMENDMENT EXHIBIT B INSURANCE AND BONDS ARTICLE 1 INITIAL INFORMATION § 1.1 This Agreement is based on the Initial Information set forth in this Section 1.1. (For each item in this section, insert the information or a statement such as “not applicable” or “unknown at time of execution.”) § 1.1.1 The Owner’s program for the Project, as described in Section 4.1.1: (Insert the Owner’s program, identify documentation that establishes the Owner’s program, or state the manner in which the program will be developed.) «New facility with 2 ice rinks, indoor artificial turf field, gym fieldhouse, walking track, indoor playground, fitness, and multi-purpose space. » § 1.1.2 The Project’s physical characteristics: (Identify or describe pertinent information about the Project’s physical characteristics, such as size; location; dimensions; geotechnical reports; site boundaries; topographic surveys; traffic and utility studies; availability of public and private utilities and services; legal description of the site, etc.) «approximately 178,000sf » § 1.1.3 The Owner’s budget for the Guaranteed Maximum Price, as defined in Article 6: 238 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 3 235737v2 (Provide total and, if known, a line item breakdown.) «$80 million total project budget » § 1.1.4 The Owner’s anticipated design and construction milestone dates: .1 Design phase milestone dates, if any: «Bid Documents complete spring 2026 » .2 Construction commencement date: «Summer 2026 » .3 Substantial Completion date or dates: «Spring 2028 » .4 Other milestone dates: « » § 1.1.5 The Owner’s requirements for accelerated or fast-track scheduling, or phased construction, are set forth below: (Identify any requirements for fast-track scheduling or phased construction.) « » § 1.1.6 The Owner’s anticipated Sustainable Objective for the Project: (Identify and describe the Owner’s Sustainable Objective for the Project, if any.) « » § 1.1.6.1 If the Owner identifies a Sustainable Objective, the Owner and Construction Manager shall complete and incorporate AIA Document E234™–2019, Sustainable Projects Exhibit, Construction Manager as Constructor Edition, into this Agreement to define the terms, conditions and services related to the Owner’s Sustainable Objective. If E234– 2019 is incorporated into this agreement, the Owner and Construction Manager shall incorporate the completed E234– 2019 into the agreements with the consultants and contractors performing services or Work in any way associated with the Sustainable Objective. § 1.1.7 Other Project information: (Identify special characteristics or needs of the Project not provided elsewhere.) « » § 1.1.8 The Owner identifies the following representative in accordance with Section 4.2: (List name, address, and other contact information.) «City of Chanhassen » «7700 Market Blvd Chanhassen, MN 55317 » Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager § 1.1.9 The persons or entities, in addition to the Owner’s representative, who are required to review the Construction Manager’s submittals to the Owner are as follows: (List name, address and other contact information.) 239 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 4 235737v2 « » § 1.1.10 The Owner shall retain the following consultants and contractors: (List name, legal status, address, and other contact information.) .1 Geotechnical Engineer: «TBD »« » « » « » « » « » .2 Civil Engineer: « Bolton-Menk »« » « 2638 Shadow Lane » «Suite 200 » «Chaska, MN 55318 » « » .3 Other, if any: (List any other consultants retained by the Owner, such as a Project or Program Manager.) «All other design and engineering disciplines required to fully engineer and design the project. » § 1.1.11 The Architect’s representative: (List name, address, and other contact information.) « » § 1.1.12 The Construction Manager identifies the following representative in accordance with Article 3: (List name, address, and other contact information.) «RJM Construction, LLC » «830 Boone Avenue North » «Golden Valley, MN 55427 » «Brad Barickman, Vice President » § 1.1.13 The Owner’s requirements for the Construction Manager’s staffing plan for Preconstruction Services, as required under Section 3.1.9: (List any Owner-specific requirements to be included in the staffing plan.) « » § 1.1.14 The Owner’s requirements for subcontractor procurement for the performance of the Work: (List any Owner-specific requirements for subcontractor procurement.) « Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and Request for Bids (RFB) » § 1.1.15 Other Initial Information on which this Agreement is based: « » 240 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 5 235737v2 § 1.2 The Owner and Construction Manager may rely on the Initial Information. Both parties, however, recognize that such information may materially change and, in that event, the Owner and the Construction Manager shall appropriately adjust the Project schedule, the Construction Manager’s services, and the Construction Manager’s compensation. The Owner shall adjust the Owner’s budget for the Guaranteed Maximum Price and the Owner’s anticipated design and construction milestones, as necessary, to accommodate material changes in the Initial Information. § 1.3 Neither the Owner’s nor the Construction Manager’s representative shall be changed without ten days’ prior notice to the other party. ARTICLE 2 GENERAL PROVISIONS § 2.1 The Contract Documents The Contract Documents consist of this Agreement, Conditions of the Contract (General, Supplementary and other Conditions), Drawings, Specifications, Addenda issued prior to execution of this Agreement, other documents listed in this Agreement, and Modifications issued after execution of this Agreement, all of which form the Contract and are as fully a part of the Contract as if attached to this Agreement or repeated herein. Upon the Owner’s acceptance of the Construction Manager’s Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal, the Contract Documents will also include the documents described in Section 3.2.3 and identified in the Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment and revisions prepared by the Architect and furnished by the Owner as described in Section 3.2.8. The Contract represents the entire and integrated agreement between the parties hereto and supersedes prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. If anything in the other Contract Documents, other than a Modification, is inconsistent with this Agreement, this Agreement shall govern. An enumeration of the Contract Documents, other than a Modification, appears in Article 15. § 2.2 Relationship of the Parties The Construction Manager accepts the relationship of trust and confidence established by this Agreement and covenants with the Owner to cooperate with the Architect and exercise the Construction Manager’s skill and judgment in furthering the interests of the Owner to furnish efficient construction administration, management services, and supervision; to ensure that the prime contractors and their subcontractors and suppliers provide an adequate supply of workers, equipment and materials. The Construction Manager shall manage the prime contractors to perform the Work in an expeditious and economical manner consistent with the Owner’s interests.. The Owner agrees to furnish or approve, in a timely manner, information required by the Construction Manager and to make payments to the Construction Manager in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. § 2.2.1 Construction Manager is an independent contractor and not an agent of the Owner. Construction Manager shall be liable to the Owner for acts and omissions of Construction Manager and Construction Manager’s Subcontractors and Suppliers of any tier, and their agents, employees and parties in privity of contract with any of them and anyone acting on behalf of any of them, and any other persons performing any of the Work directly or indirectly under contract with Construction Manager. § 2.3 General Conditions § 2.3.1 For the Preconstruction Phase, AIA Document A201™–2017, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction (as modified), shall apply as follows: Section 1.5, Ownership and Use of Documents; Section 1.7, Digital Data Use and Transmission; Section 1.8, Building Information Model Use and Reliance; Section 2.2.4, Confidential Information; Section 3.12.10, Professional Services; Section 10.3, Hazardous Materials; Section 13.1, Governing Law. The term “Contractor” as used in A201–2017 shall mean the Construction Manager. Notwithstanding any language to the contrary in this Agreement or in AIA A201 General Conditions, as modified, the Construction Manager shall not perform any of the Work with its own forces or with affiliated entities. § 2.3.2 For the Construction Phase, the general conditions of the contract shall be as set forth in A201–2017, which document is incorporated herein by reference. The term “Contractor” as used in A201–2017 shall mean the Construction Manager. ARTICLE 3 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER’S RESPONSIBILITIES The Construction Manager’s Preconstruction Phase responsibilities are set forth in Sections 3.1 and 3.2, and in the applicable provisions of A201-2017 referenced in Section 2.3.1. The Construction Manager’s Construction Phase responsibilities are set forth in Section 3.3. The Owner and Construction Manager may agree, in consultation with the 241 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 6 235737v2 Architect, for the Construction Phase to commence prior to completion of the Preconstruction Phase, in which case, both phases will proceed concurrently. The Construction Manager shall identify a representative authorized to act on behalf of the Construction Manager with respect to the Project. § 3.1 Preconstruction Phase § 3.1.1 Extent of Responsibility The Construction Manager shall exercise reasonable care in performing its Preconstruction Services. The Owner and Architect shall be entitled to rely on, and shall not be responsible for, the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of services and information furnished by the Construction Manager. The Construction Manager, however, does not warrant or guarantee estimates and schedules except as may be included as part of the Guaranteed Maximum Price. The Construction Manager is not required to ascertain that the Drawings and Specifications are in accordance with applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, codes, rules and regulations, or lawful orders of public authorities, but the Construction Manager shall promptly report to the Architect and Owner any nonconformity discovered by or made known to the Construction Manager as a request for information in such form as the Architect may require. § 3.1.2 Deleted in its entirety. § 3.1.3 Consultation § 3.1.3.1 The Construction Manager shall schedule and conduct meetings with the Architect and Owner to discuss such matters as procedures, progress, coordination, and scheduling of the Work. § 3.1.3.2 The Construction Manager shall advise the Owner and Architect on proposed site use and improvements, selection of materials, building systems, and equipment. The Construction Manager shall also provide recommendations to the Owner and Architect, consistent with the Project requirements, on constructability; availability of materials and labor; time requirements for procurement, installation and construction; prefabrication; and factors related to construction cost including, but not limited to, costs of alternative designs or materials, preliminary budgets, life-cycle data, and possible cost reductions. The Construction Manager shall consult with the Architect regarding professional services to be provided by the Construction Manager during the Construction Phase. § 3.1.3.3 The Construction Manager shall assist the Owner and Architect in establishing building information modeling and digital data protocols for the Project, using AIA Document E203™–2013, Building Information Modeling and Digital Data Exhibit, to establish the protocols for the development, use, transmission, and exchange of digital data. § 3.1.4 Project Schedule When Project requirements in Section 4.1.1 have been sufficiently identified, the Construction Manager shall prepare and periodically update a Project schedule for the Architect’s review and the Owner’s acceptance. Subject to written disclaimer or qualification from the Owner as to accuracy, the Construction Manager shall obtain the Architect’s approval for the portion of the Project schedule relating to the performance of the Architect’s services. The Project schedule shall coordinate and integrate the Construction Manager’s services, the Architect’s services, other Owner consultants’ services, and the Owner’s responsibilities; and identify items that affect the Project’s timely completion. The updated Project schedule shall include the following: submission of the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal; components of the Work; times of commencement and completion required of each Subcontractor; ordering and delivery of products, including those that must be ordered in advance of construction; and the occupancy requirements of the Owner. § 3.1.5 Phased Construction The Construction Manager, in consultation with the Architect, shall provide recommendations with regard to accelerated or fast-track scheduling, procurement, and sequencing for phased construction. The Construction Manager shall take into consideration cost reductions, cost information, constructability, provisions for temporary facilities, and procurement and construction scheduling issues. § 3.1.6 Cost Estimates § 3.1.6.1 Based on the preliminary design and other design criteria prepared by the Architect, the Construction Manager shall prepare, for the Architect’s review and the Owner’s approval, preliminary estimates of the Cost of the Work or the cost of program requirements using area, volume, or similar conceptual estimating techniques. If the Architect or 242 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 7 235737v2 Construction Manager suggests alternative materials and systems, the Construction Manager shall provide cost evaluations of those alternative materials and systems. § 3.1.6.2 As the Architect progresses with the preparation of the Schematic Design, Design Development and Construction Documents, the Construction Manager shall prepare and update, at appropriate intervals agreed to by the Owner, Construction Manager and Architect, an estimate of the Cost of the Work with increasing detail and refinement. The Construction Manager shall include in the estimate those costs to allow for the further development of the design, price escalation, and market conditions, until such time as the Owner and Construction Manager agree on a Guaranteed Maximum Price for the Work. The estimate shall be provided for the Architect’s review and the Owner’s approval. The Construction Manager shall inform the Owner and Architect in the event that the estimate of the Cost of the Work exceeds the latest approved Project budget, and make recommendations for corrective action. § 3.1.6.3 If the Architect is providing cost estimating services as a Supplemental Service, and a discrepancy exists between the Construction Manager’s cost estimates and the Architect’s cost estimates, the Construction Manager and the Architect shall work together to reconcile the cost estimates. § 3.1.7 As the Architect progresses with the preparation of the Schematic Design, Design Development and Construction Documents, the Construction Manager shall consult with the Owner and Architect and make recommendations regarding constructability and schedules, for the Architect’s review and the Owner’s approval. § 3.1.8 The Construction Manager shall provide recommendations and information to the Owner and Architect regarding equipment, materials, services, and temporary Project facilities. § 3.1.9 The Construction Manager shall provide a staffing plan for Preconstruction Phase services for the Owner’s review and approval. § 3.1.10 If the Owner identified a Sustainable Objective in Article 1, the Construction Manager shall fulfill its Preconstruction Phase responsibilities as required in AIA Document E234™–2019, Sustainable Projects Exhibit, Construction Manager as Constructor Edition, attached to this Agreement. § 3.1.11 Subcontractors and Suppliers § 3.1.11.1 If the Owner has provided requirements for subcontractor procurement in section 1.1.14, the Construction Manager shall provide a subcontracting plan, addressing the Owner’s requirements, for the Owner’s review and approval. All contracts for the Work shall be publicly bid in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.345 and awarded by the Owner. The term “Subcontractors” used in this Agreement and in A201-2017 General Conditions shall mean the prime contractors that have bid for and been awarded contracts by the Owner, subject to assignment by Owner to Construction Manager. § 3.1.11.2 The Construction Manager shall develop bidders’ interest in the Project. § 3.1.11.3 The processes described in Article 9 shall apply if bid packages will be issued during the Preconstruction Phase. § 3.1.11.4 Construction Manager shall coordinate Owner-purchased and/or third party provided equipment with construction of the Project, including but not limited to coordination of mechanical and electrical needs with respect to the location and installation of the equipment and the timing of the delivery of the equipment. Construction Manager shall include deliveries of equipment in the construction schedule and will coordinate the Work to accommodate such deliveries. § 3.1.12 Procurement The Construction Manager shall prepare, for the Architect’s review and the Owner’s acceptance, a procurement schedule for items that must be ordered in advance of construction. The Construction Manager shall expedite and coordinate the ordering and delivery of materials that must be ordered in advance of construction. Upon the establishment of the Guaranteed Maximum Price, the Owner shall assign all contracts for these items to the Construction Manager and the Construction Manager shall thereafter accept responsibility for them. 243 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 8 235737v2 § 3.1.13 Compliance with Laws The Construction Manager shall comply with applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, codes, rules and regulations, and lawful orders of public authorities applicable to its performance under this Contract, and with equal employment opportunity programs, and other programs as may be required by governmental and quasi-governmental authorities. § 3.1.14 Other Preconstruction Services Insert a description of any other Preconstruction Phase services to be provided by the Construction Manager, or reference an exhibit attached to this document (Describe any other Preconstruction Phase services, such as providing cash flow projections, development of a project information management system, early selection or procurement of subcontractors, etc.) « The Construction Manager’s services shall include attendance at meetings with county staff members, county board members, city staff members, building construction officials, and other governmental officials as may be required for the development of the Project. » § 3.2 Guaranteed Maximum Price Proposal § 3.2.1 At a time to be mutually agreed upon by the Owner and the Construction Manager, the Construction Manager shall prepare a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal for the Owner’s and Architect’s review, and the Owner’s acceptance. The Guaranteed Maximum Price in the proposal shall be the sum of the Construction Manager’s estimate of the Cost of the Work, the Construction Manager’s contingency described in Section 3.2.4, and the Construction Manager’s Fee described in Section 6.1.2. § 3.2.2 To the extent that the Contract Documents are anticipated to require further development, the Guaranteed Maximum Price includes the costs attributable to such further development consistent with the Contract Documents and reasonably inferable therefrom. Such further development does not include changes in scope, systems, kinds and quality of materials, finishes, or equipment, all of which, if required, shall be incorporated by Change Order. § 3.2.3 The Construction Manager shall include with the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal a written statement of its basis, which shall include the following: .1 A list of the Drawings and Specifications, including all Addenda thereto, and the Conditions of the Contract; .2 A list of the clarifications and assumptions made by the Construction Manager in the preparation of the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal, including assumptions under Section 3.2.2; .3 A statement of the proposed Guaranteed Maximum Price, including a statement of the estimated Cost of the Work organized by trade categories or systems, including allowances; the Construction Manager’s contingency set forth in Section 3.2.4; and the Construction Manager’s Fee; .4 The anticipated date of Substantial Completion upon which the proposed Guaranteed Maximum Price is based; and .5 A date by which the Owner must accept the Guaranteed Maximum Price. § 3.2.4 In preparing the Construction Manager’s Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal, the Construction Manager shall include a contingency for the Construction Manager’s exclusive use to cover those costs that are included in the Guaranteed Maximum Price but not otherwise allocated to another line item or included in a Change Order. § 3.2.5 The Construction Manager shall meet with the Owner and Architect to review the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal. In the event that the Owner or Architect discover any inconsistencies or inaccuracies in the information presented, they shall promptly notify the Construction Manager, who shall make appropriate adjustments to the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal, its basis, or both. § 3.2.6 If the Owner notifies the Construction Manager that the Owner has accepted the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal in writing before the date specified in the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal, the Guaranteed Maximum 244 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 9 235737v2 Price proposal shall be deemed effective without further acceptance from the Construction Manager. Following acceptance of a Guaranteed Maximum Price, the Owner and Construction Manager shall execute the Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment amending this Agreement, a copy of which the Owner shall provide to the Architect. The Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment shall set forth the agreed upon Guaranteed Maximum Price with the information and assumptions upon which it is based. § 3.2.7 The Construction Manager shall not incur any cost to be reimbursed as part of the Cost of the Work prior to the execution of the Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment, unless the Owner provides prior written authorization for such costs. § 3.2.8 The Owner shall authorize preparation of revisions to the Contract Documents that incorporate the agreed-upon assumptions and clarifications contained in the Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment. The Owner shall promptly furnish such revised Contract Documents to the Construction Manager. The Construction Manager shall notify the Owner and Architect of any inconsistencies between the agreed-upon assumptions and clarifications contained in the Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment and the revised Contract Documents. § 3.2.9 The Construction Manager shall include in the Guaranteed Maximum Price all sales, consumer, use and similar taxes for the Work provided by the Construction Manager that are legally enacted, whether or not yet effective, at the time the Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment is executed. § 3.3 Construction Phase § 3.3.1 General § 3.3.1.1 For purposes of Section 8.1.2 of A201–2017, the date of commencement of the Work shall mean the date of commencement of the Construction Phase. § 3.3.1.2 The Construction Phase shall commence upon the Owner’s execution of the Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment or, prior to acceptance of the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal, by written agreement of the parties and upon receipt of the Building Permit for the Project. The written agreement shall set forth a description of the Work to be performed by the Construction Manager, and any insurance and bond requirements for Work performed prior to execution of the Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment. § 3.3.2 Administration § 3.3.2.1 The Construction Manager shall schedule and conduct meetings to discuss such matters as procedures, progress, coordination, scheduling, and status of the Work. The Construction Manager shall prepare and promptly distribute minutes of the meetings to the Owner and Architect. § 3.3.2.2 Upon the execution of the Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment, the Construction Manager shall prepare and submit to the Owner and Architect a construction schedule for the Work and a submittal schedule in accordance with Section 3.10 of A201–2017. § 3.3.2.3 Monthly Report The Construction Manager shall record the progress of the Project. On a monthly basis, or otherwise as agreed to by the Owner, the Construction Manager shall submit written progress reports to the Owner and Architect, showing percentages of completion and other information required by the Owner. § 3.3.2.4 Daily Logs The Construction Manager shall keep, and make available to the Owner and Architect, a daily log containing a record for each day of weather, portions of the Work in progress, number of workers on site, identification of equipment on site, problems that might affect progress of the work, accidents, injuries, and other information required by the Owner. § 3.3.2.5 Cost Control The Construction Manager shall develop a system of cost control for the Work, including regular monitoring of actual costs for activities in progress and estimates for uncompleted tasks and proposed changes. The Construction Manager shall identify variances between actual and estimated costs and report the variances to the Owner and Architect, and 245 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 10 235737v2 shall provide this information in its monthly reports to the Owner and Architect, in accordance with Section 3.3.2.3 above. ARTICLE 4 OWNER’S RESPONSIBILITIES § 4.1 Information and Services Required of the Owner § 4.1.1 The Owner shall provide information with reasonable promptness, regarding requirements for and limitations on the Project, including a written program which shall set forth the Owner’s objectives, constraints, and criteria, including schedule, space requirements and relationships, flexibility and expandability, special equipment, systems, sustainability and site requirements. § 4.1.2 [Not Used.] § 4.1.3 The Owner shall establish and periodically update the Owner’s budget for the Project, including (1) the budget for the Cost of the Work as defined in Article 7, (2) the Owner’s other costs, and (3) reasonable contingencies related to all of these costs. If the Owner significantly increases or decreases the Owner’s budget for the Cost of the Work, the Owner shall notify the Construction Manager and Architect. The Owner and the Architect, in consultation with the Construction Manager, shall thereafter agree to a corresponding change in the Project’s scope and quality. § 4.1.4 Structural and Environmental Tests, Surveys and Reports. During the Preconstruction Phase, the Owner shall furnish the following information or services with reasonable promptness. The Owner shall also furnish any other information or services under the Owner’s control and relevant to the Construction Manager’s performance of the Work with reasonable promptness after receiving the Construction Manager’s written request for such information or services. The Construction Manager shall be entitled to rely on the accuracy of information and services furnished by the Owner but shall exercise proper precautions relating to the safe performance of the Work. § 4.1.4.1 The Owner shall furnish tests, inspections, and reports, required by law and as otherwise agreed to by the parties, such as structural, mechanical, and chemical tests, tests for air and water pollution, and tests for hazardous materials. § 4.1.4.2 The Owner shall furnish surveys describing physical characteristics, legal limitations and utility locations for the site of the Project, and a written legal description of the site. The surveys and legal information shall include, as applicable, grades and lines of streets, alleys, pavements and adjoining property and structures; designated wetlands; adjacent drainage; rights-of-way, restrictions, easements, encroachments, zoning, deed restrictions, boundaries and contours of the site; locations, dimensions and other necessary data with respect to existing buildings, other improvements and trees; and information concerning available utility services and lines, both public and private, above and below grade, including inverts and depths. All the information on the survey shall be referenced to a Project benchmark. § 4.1.4.3 The Owner, when such services are requested, shall furnish services of geotechnical engineers, which may include test borings, test pits, determinations of soil bearing values, percolation tests, evaluations of hazardous materials, seismic evaluation, ground corrosion tests and resistivity tests, including necessary operations for anticipating subsoil conditions, with written reports and appropriate recommendations. § 4.1.5 During the Construction Phase, the Owner shall furnish information or services required of the Owner by the Contract Documents with reasonable promptness. The Owner shall also furnish any other information or services under the Owner’s control and relevant to the Construction Manager’s performance of the Work with reasonable promptness after receiving the Construction Manager’s written request for such information or services. § 4.1.6 If the Owner identified a Sustainable Objective in Article 1, the Owner shall fulfill its responsibilities as required in AIA Document E234™–2019, Sustainable Projects Exhibit, Construction Manager as Constructor Edition, attached to this Agreement. § 4.2 Owner’s Designated Representative The Owner shall identify a representative authorized to act on behalf of the Owner with respect to the Project. The Owner’s representative shall render decisions promptly and furnish information expeditiously, so as to avoid 246 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 11 235737v2 unreasonable delay in the services or Work of the Construction Manager. Except as otherwise provided in Section 4.2.1 of A201–2017, the Architect does not have such authority. The term “Owner” means the Owner or the Owner’s authorized representative. § 4.2.1 Legal Requirements. The Owner shall furnish all legal, insurance and accounting services, including auditing services, that may be reasonably necessary at any time for the Project to meet the Owner’s needs and interests. § 4.3 Architect The Owner shall retain an Architect to provide services, duties and responsibilities as described in AIA Document B133™–2019, Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect, Construction Manager as Constructor Edition, including any additional services requested by the Construction Manager that are necessary for the Preconstruction and Construction Phase services under this Agreement. The Owner shall provide the Construction Manager with a copy of the scope of services in the executed agreement between the Owner and the Architect, and any further modifications to the Architect’s scope of services in the agreement. ARTICLE 5 COMPENSATION AND PAYMENTS FOR PRECONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES § 5.1 Compensation § 5.1.1 For the Construction Manager’s Preconstruction Phase services described in Sections 3.1 and 3.2, the Owner shall compensate the Construction Manager as follows: (Insert amount of, or basis for, compensation and include a list of reimbursable cost items, as applicable.) «$20,000 lump sum, assumes 5 months of pre-construction per RFQ/RFP directive » § 5.1.2 The hourly billing rates for Preconstruction Phase services of the Construction Manager and the Construction Manager’s Consultants and Subcontractors, if any, are set forth below. (If applicable, attach an exhibit of hourly billing rates or insert them below.) « » Individual or Position Rate Project Executive Project Manager Estimator MEP & Sustainability Coordinator Virtual Design Document Quality Control $200 $145 $150 $180 $140 $135.45 § 5.1.2.1 Hourly billing rates for Preconstruction Phase services include all costs to be paid or incurred by the Construction Manager, as required by law or collective bargaining agreements, for taxes, insurance, contributions, assessments and benefits and, for personnel not covered by collective bargaining agreements, customary benefits such as sick leave, medical and health benefits, holidays, vacations and pensions, and shall remain unchanged unless the parties execute a Modification. § 5.1.3 If the Preconstruction Phase services covered by this Agreement have not been completed within «five» («5» ) months of the date of this Agreement, through no fault of the Construction Manager, the Construction Manager’s compensation for Preconstruction Phase services shall be equitably adjusted. § 5.2 Payments § 5.2.1 Unless otherwise agreed, payments for services shall be made monthly in proportion to services performed. § 5.2.2 Payments are due and payable upon presentation of the Construction Manager’s invoice. Pursuant to the Prompt Payment of Local Government Bills, Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.425 (Prompt Payment Act), amounts unpaid and not subject to a good faith dispute thirty-five (35) days after the invoice date shall bear interest at the rate entered below, 247 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 12 235737v2 or in the absence thereof at the legal rate prevailing from time to time at the principal place of business of the Construction Manager. (Insert rate of monthly or annual interest agreed upon.) «At the legal rate prevailing. » ARTICLE 6 COMPENSATION FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES § 6.1 Contract Sum § 6.1.1 The Owner shall pay the Construction Manager the Contract Sum in current funds for the Construction Manager’s performance of the Contract after execution of the Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment. The Contract Sum is the Cost of the Work as defined in Article 7 plus the Construction Manager’s Fee. § 6.1.2 The Construction Manager’s Fee: (State a lump sum, percentage of Cost of the Work or other provision for determining the Construction Manager’s Fee.) «The Construction Manager’s Fee shall be « one and a half » percent (1.50 » %) of the Cost of the Work. The Construction Manager’s Fee shall be invoiced as a stipulated sum based on the Guaranteed Maximum Price as stated in the Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment. » § 6.1.3 The method of adjustment of the Construction Manager’s Fee for changes in the Work: «For changes in the Work, the Construction Manager’s Fee shall be «three » percent ( « 3 » %) of the increases in the Cost of the Work. There shall be no decrease in the Construction Manager’s fee for deductive change orders. » § 6.1.4 Limitations, if any, on a Subcontractor’s overhead and profit for increases in the cost of its portion of the Work: « » § 6.1.5 Rental rates for Construction Manager-owned equipment shall not exceed « » percent ( « » %) of the standard rental rate paid at the place of the Project.. [If Applicable: Include a schedule of equipment with agreed-upon charges on an hourly, daily, and/or monthly basis - schedule should also include a standard amount or mark-up for minor repairs, fuel oil, and grease] § 6.1.6 Liquidated damages, if any: (Insert terms and conditions for liquidated damages, if any.) « » § 6.1.7 Other: (Insert provisions for bonus, cost savings or other incentives, if any, that might result in a change to the Contract Sum.) « » § 6.2 Guaranteed Maximum Price The Construction Manager guarantees that the Contract Sum shall not exceed the Guaranteed Maximum Price set forth in the Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment, subject to additions and deductions by Change Order as provided in the Contract Documents. In addition to Construction Manager’s Fee, General Conditions and Contingency, the Guaranteed Maximum Price will be determined based upon public bids for prime contracts, which awarded bids will be assigned to Construction Manager for administration pursuant to subcontract agreements to be entered into between Construction Manager and the awarded bidder, as well as the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, A201-2017 as modified. Construction Manager will not self-perform any work under this Agreement. Costs which would cause the Guaranteed Maximum Price to be exceeded shall be paid by the Construction Manager without reimbursement by the Owner. 248 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 13 235737v2 «If the actual Cost of the Work and the Construction Manager’s Fee total less than the Guaranteed Maximum Price, as may be adjusted by Changes to the Work, then the savings will be returned 100% to the Owner. » § 6.3 Changes in the Work § 6.3.1 The Owner may, without invalidating the Contract, order changes in the Work within the general scope of the Contract consisting of additions, deletions or other revisions. The Owner shall issue such changes in writing. The Construction Manager may be entitled to an equitable adjustment in the Contract Time as a result of changes in the Work. § 6.3.1.1 The Architect may order minor changes in the Work as provided in Article 7 of AIA Document A201–2017, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. § 6.3.2 Adjustments to the Guaranteed Maximum Price on account of changes in the Work subsequent to the execution of the Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment may be determined by any of the methods listed in Article 7 of AIA Document A201–2017, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. § 6.3.3 Adjustments to subcontracts awarded on the basis of a stipulated sum shall be determined in accordance with Article 7 of A201–2017, as they refer to “cost” and “fee,” and not by Articles 6 and 7 of this Agreement. Adjustments to subcontracts awarded with the Owner’s prior written consent on the basis of cost plus a fee shall be calculated in accordance with the terms of those subcontracts. § 6.3.4 In calculating adjustments to the Guaranteed Maximum Price, the terms “cost” and “costs” as used in Article 7 of AIA Document A201–2017 shall mean the Cost of the Work as defined in Article 7 of this Agreement and the term “fee” shall mean the Construction Manager’s Fee as defined in Section 6.1.2 of this Agreement. § 6.3.5 If no specific provision is made in Section 6.1.3 for adjustment of the Construction Manager’s Fee in the case of changes in the Work, or if the extent of such changes is such, in the aggregate, that application of the adjustment provisions of Section 6.1.3 will cause substantial inequity to the Owner or Construction Manager, the Construction Manager’s Fee shall be equitably adjusted on the same basis that was used to establish the Fee for the original Work, and the Guaranteed Maximum Price shall be adjusted accordingly. § 6.4 POTENTIALLY TIME AND PRICE-IMPACTED MATERIAL. § 6.4.1 In the event of significant delay or price increase of material, equipment or energy occurring during the performance of the contract through no fault of Contractor or its subcontractors, the contract sum, time of completion or contract requirements shall be equitably adjusted by change order in accordance with the procedures of the contract documents. A change in price of an item of material, equipment, or energy shall be considered significant when the price of an items increases [5]% or more between the date of this Agreement and the date of installation. § 6.4.2 The Owner upon receipt of notice of a significant price increase, shall provide advise Contractor within twenty- four (24) hours of an authorization to proceed with purchase of the specified equipment, building material or materials along with a corresponding increase to the Contract Sum, or of its intent to terminate this Agreement. ARTICLE 7 COST OF THE WORK FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE § 7.1 Costs to Be Reimbursed § 7.1.1 The term Cost of the Work shall mean costs necessarily incurred by the Construction Manager in the proper performance of the Work. The Cost of the Work shall include only the items set forth in Sections 7.1 through 7.7. § 7.1.2 Where, pursuant to the Contract Documents, any cost is subject to the Owner’s prior approval, the Construction Manager shall obtain such approval in writing prior to incurring the cost. § 7.1.3 Costs shall be at rates not higher than the standard rates paid at the place of the Project, except with prior approval of the Owner. 249 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 14 235737v2 § 7.2 Labor Costs § 7.2.1 Wages or salaries of construction workers directly employed by the Construction Manager to perform the construction of the Work at the site or, with the Owner’s prior approval, at off-site workshops. § 7.2.2 Wages or salaries of the Construction Manager’s supervisory and administrative personnel when stationed at the site and performing Work, with the Owner’s prior approval. § 7.2.2.1 Wages or salaries of the Construction Manager’s supervisory and administrative personnel when performing Work and stationed at a location other than the site, but only for that portion of time required for the Work, and limited to the personnel and activities listed below: (Identify the personnel, type of activity and, if applicable, any agreed upon percentage of time to be devoted to the Work.) «Reimbursement rates per hours of service: • Superintendent / General Foreman - $140/hour • Assistant Superintendent / Carpenter Foreman II - $120/hour • Carpenter Foreman - $112/hour • Lead Carpenter - $109/hour • Journeyman Carpenter $103.45/hour • Laborer Foreman $104/hour • General Laborer - $98/hour • Labor Apprentice - $86/hour • Operator - $123/hour • Trucking - $104/hour Rates shall be subject to May 1 annual revisions to the Bargaining Laboring Agreements. Reimbursement rates per hours of service wherever employed in connection with the work as follows: • Project Principal / Vice President / Risk Management - $200.00/hour • Project Executive/Chief Estimator - $200/hour • Sr. Project Manager / MEP - $165.00/hour • Project Manager / Estimator - $145/hour • Scheduler/BIM - $180/hour • Project Engineer / Estimating Engineer - $115/hour • Project Administration / Accounting - $77.00/hour • General Superintendent - $155/hour • Safety Director - $155.00/hour • Quality Control Director - $135.45/hour • General Foreman/Field Superintendent - $140/hour » Rates shall be subject to May 1 annual revisions. § 7.2.3 Wages and salaries of the Construction Manager’s supervisory or administrative personnel engaged at factories, workshops or while traveling, in expediting the production or transportation of materials or equipment required for the Work, but only for that portion of their time required for the Work. § 7.2.4 Costs paid or incurred by the Construction Manager, as required by law or collective bargaining agreements, for taxes, insurance, contributions, assessments and benefits and, for personnel not covered by collective bargaining agreements, customary benefits such as sick leave, medical and health benefits, holidays, vacations and pensions, provided such costs are based on wages and salaries included in the Cost of the Work under Sections 7.2.1 through 7.2.3. § 7.2.5 250 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 15 235737v2 § 7.3 Subcontract Costs Payments made by the Construction Manager to Subcontractors in accordance with the requirements of the subcontracts and this Agreement. Owner payment obligations to Construction Manager, and the Construction Manager payment obligations to subcontractors shall be governed by the Municipal Prompt Payment Act, Minnesota Statutes Section 471.425, specifically including the requirement that the Construction Manager pay subcontractors within ten (10) days of receipt of payment from the Owner. § 7.4 Costs of Materials and Equipment Incorporated in the Completed Construction § 7.4.1 Costs, including transportation and storage at the site, of materials and equipment incorporated, or to be incorporated, in the completed construction. § 7.4.2 Costs of materials described in the preceding Section 7.4.1 in excess of those actually installed to allow for reasonable waste and spoilage. Unused excess materials, if any, shall become the Owner’s property at the completion of the Work or, at the Owner’s option, shall be sold by the Construction Manager. Any amounts realized from such sales shall be credited to the Owner as a deduction from the Cost of the Work. § 7.5 Costs of Other Materials and Equipment, Temporary Facilities and Related Items § 7.5.1 Costs of transportation, storage, installation, dismantling, maintenance, and removal of materials, supplies, temporary facilities, machinery, equipment and hand tools not customarily owned by construction workers that are provided by the Construction Manager at the site and fully consumed in the performance of the Work. Costs of materials, supplies, temporary facilities, machinery, equipment, and tools, that are not fully consumed, shall be based on the cost or value of the item at the time it is first used on the Project site less the value of the item when it is no longer used at the Project site. Costs for items not fully consumed by the Construction Manager shall mean fair market value. § 7.5.2 Rental charges for temporary facilities, machinery, equipment, and hand tools not customarily owned by construction workers that are provided by the Construction Manager at the site, and the costs of transportation, installation, dismantling, minor repairs, and removal of such temporary facilities, machinery, equipment, and hand tools. Rates and quantities of equipment owned by the Construction Manager, or a related party as defined in Section 7.8, shall be subject to the Owner’s prior approval. The total rental cost of any such equipment may not exceed the purchase price of any comparable item. [If applicable: attach a schedule of equipment and associated charges] § 7.5.3 Costs of removal of debris from the site of the Work and its proper and legal disposal. § 7.5.4 Costs of the Construction Manager’s site office, including general office equipment and supplies. § 7.5.5 Costs of materials and equipment suitably stored off the site at a mutually acceptable location, subject to the Owner’s prior approval. § 7.6 Miscellaneous Costs § 7.6.1 Premiums for insurance and bonds required by the Contract Documents. 1. General Liability Insurance rate $8.90/$1,000 revenue. 2. Builders Risk Insurance rate $2.50/$1,000 revenue. 3. Performance Bond rate 0.58% of the GMP amount. 4. Premiums for Subcontractor Bonds or Subcontractor Default Insurance (SDI); Subcontractor Bonds will vary dependent on rates determined by awarded subcontractor. SDI rate is 1.25% of subcontract value. SDI may be substituted for Subcontractor Performance Bonds if it is determined to be more cost effective at the time of GMP. Subcontractor payment bonds will be required regardless. § 7.6.1.1 Costs for self-insurance, for either full or partial amounts of the coverages required by the Contract Documents, with the Owner’s prior approval. 251 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 16 235737v2 § 7.6.1.2 Costs for insurance through a captive insurer owned or controlled by the Construction Manager, with the Owner’s prior approval. § 7.6.2 Sales, use, or similar taxes, imposed by a governmental authority, that are related to the Work and for which the Construction Manager is liable. § 7.6.3 Fees and assessments for the building permit, and for other permits, licenses, and inspections, for which the Construction Manager is required by the Contract Documents to pay. § 7.6.4 Fees of laboratories for tests required by the Contract Documents; except those related to defective or nonconforming Work for which reimbursement is excluded under Article 13 of AIA Document A201–2017 or by other provisions of the Contract Documents, and which do not fall within the scope of Section 7.7.3. § 7.6.5 Royalties and license fees paid for the use of a particular design, process, or product, required by the Contract Documents, but only if approved in advance by Owner in writing. § 7.6.5.1 [Not Used.] § 7.6.6 Costs for communications services, electronic equipment, and software, related to the Work and located at the site, with the Owner’s prior approval. «Technology fee rate is « $8.90per management labor hour. » § 7.6.7 Costs of document reproductions and delivery charges. § 7.6.8 Deposits lost for causes other than the Construction Manager’s negligence or failure to fulfill a specific responsibility in the Contract Documents. § 7.6.9 [Not Used] § 7.6.10 Expenses incurred in accordance with the Construction Manager’s standard written personnel policy for relocation and temporary living allowances of the Construction Manager’s personnel required for the Work, with the Owner’s prior approval. § 7.6.11 That portion of the reasonable expenses of the Construction Manager’s supervisory or administrative personnel incurred while traveling in discharge of duties connected with the Work provided such costs are approved in advance by the Owner in writing. § 7.6.12 Any overtime premium or shift differential expense to be incurred by the Construction Manager for hourly workers shall require Owner’s advance written approval before the incremental cost of the overtime premium or shift differential will be considered a reimbursable cost. If the Construction Manager is required to work overtime as a result of an inexcusable delay or other coordination problems cause by the Construction Manager or anyone the Construction Manager is responsible for, the overtime premium and/or shift differential expense portion of the payroll expense and related labor burden costs will not be reimbursable costs. § 7.7 Other Costs and Emergencies § 7.7.1 Other costs incurred in the performance of the Work, with the Owner’s prior approval. § 7.7.2 Costs incurred in taking action to prevent threatened damage, injury, or loss, in case of an emergency affecting the safety of persons and property, as provided in Article 10 of AIA Document A201–2017. § 7.7.3 Costs of repairing or correcting damaged or nonconforming Work executed by the Construction Manager, Subcontractors, or suppliers, provided that such damaged or nonconforming Work was not caused by the negligence of, or failure to fulfill a specific responsibility by, the Construction Manager, and only to the extent that the cost of repair or correction is not recovered by the Construction Manager from insurance, sureties, Subcontractors, suppliers, or others. 252 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 17 235737v2 § 7.7.4 The costs described in Sections 7.1 through 7.7 shall be included in the Cost of the Work, notwithstanding any provision of AIA Document A201–2017 or other Conditions of the Contract which may require the Construction Manager to pay such costs, unless such costs are excluded by the provisions of Section 7.9. § 7.8 Related Party Transactions § 7.8.1 For purposes of this Section 7.8, the term “related party” shall mean (1) a parent, subsidiary, affiliate, or other entity having common ownership of, or sharing common management with, the Construction Manager; (2) any entity in which any stockholder in, or management employee of, the Construction Manager holds an equity interest in excess of ten percent in the aggregate; (3) any entity which has the right to control the business or affairs of the Construction Manager; or (4) any person, or any member of the immediate family of any person, who has the right to control the business or affairs of the Construction Manager. § 7.8.2 If any of the costs to be reimbursed arise from a transaction between the Construction Manager and a related party, the Construction Manager shall notify the Owner of the specific nature of the contemplated transaction, including the identity of the related party and the anticipated cost to be incurred, before any such transaction is consummated or cost incurred. If the Owner, after such notification, authorizes the proposed transaction in writing, then the cost incurred shall be included as a cost to be reimbursed, and the Construction Manager shall procure the Work, equipment, goods, or service, from the related party, as a Subcontractor, according to the terms of Article 9. If the Owner fails to authorize the transaction in writing, the Construction Manager shall procure the Work, equipment, goods, or service from some person or entity other than a related party according to the terms of Article 9. § 7.9 Costs Not To Be Reimbursed § 7.9.1 The Cost of the Work shall not include the items listed below: .1 Salaries and other compensation of the Construction Manager’s personnel stationed at the Construction Manager’s principal office or offices other than the site office, except as specifically provided in Section 7.2, or as may be provided in Article 14; .2 Bonuses, profit sharing, incentive compensation, and any other discretionary payments, paid to anyone hired by the Construction Manager or paid to any Subcontractor or vendor, unless the Owner has provided prior written approval; .3 Expenses of the Construction Manager’s principal office and offices other than the site office; .4 Overhead and general expenses, except as may be expressly included in Sections 7.1 to 7.7; .5 The Construction Manager’s capital expenses, including interest on the Construction Manager’s capital employed for the Work; .6 Except as provided in Section 7.7.3 of this Agreement, costs due to the negligence of, or failure to fulfill a specific responsibility of the Contract by, the Construction Manager, Subcontractors, and suppliers, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or for whose acts any of them may be liable; .7 Any cost not specifically and expressly described in Sections 7.1 to 7.7; .8 Costs, other than costs included in Change Orders approved by the Owner, that would cause the Guaranteed Maximum Price to be exceeded; .9 Costs for services incurred during the Preconstruction Phase; .10 Legal, mediation, or arbitration costs, however incurred .11 Drug testing for new hires or current employees, incentive or bonus programs (including safety), accounting and EEO and targeted business compliance staff or seminars. .12 Off-site file storage .13 Charges for mobile telephone including air time and data charges .14 Costs for vacation, holiday, sick, and training time for Construction Manager’s supervisory staff ARTICLE 8 DISCOUNTS, REBATES, AND REFUNDS § 8.1 Cash discounts obtained on payments made by the Construction Manager shall accrue to the Owner if (1) before making the payment, the Construction Manager included the amount to be paid, less such discount, in an Application for Payment and received payment from the Owner, or (2) the Owner has deposited funds with the Construction Manager with which to make payments; otherwise, cash discounts shall accrue to the Construction Manager. Trade discounts, rebates, refunds, and amounts received from sales of surplus materials and equipment shall accrue to the Owner, and the Construction Manager shall make provisions so that they can be obtained. 253 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 18 235737v2 § 8.2 Amounts that accrue to the Owner in accordance with the provisions of Section 8.1 shall be credited to the Owner as a deduction from the Cost of the Work. ARTICLE 9 SUBCONTRACTS AND OTHER AGREEMENTS § 9.1 Those portions of the Work that the Construction Manager does not customarily perform with the Construction Manager’s own personnel shall be performed under subcontracts or other appropriate agreements with the Construction Manager. The Owner may designate specific persons from whom, or entities from which, the Construction Manager shall obtain bids. The Construction Manager shall obtain bids from Subcontractors, and from suppliers of materials or equipment fabricated especially for the Work, who are qualified to perform that portion of the Work in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. The Construction Manager shall deliver such bids to the Architect and Owner with an indication as to which bids the Construction Manager intends to accept. The Owner then has the right to review the Construction Manager’s list of proposed subcontractors and suppliers in consultation with the Architect and, subject to Section 9.1.1, to object to any subcontractor or supplier. Any advice of the Architect, or approval or objection by the Owner, shall not relieve the Construction Manager of its responsibility to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. The Construction Manager shall not be required to contract with anyone to whom the Construction Manager has reasonable objection. § 9.1.[Not Used.] § 9.2 Subcontracts or other agreements shall conform to the applicable payment provisions of this Agreement, and shall not be awarded on the basis of cost plus a fee without the Owner’s prior written approval. If a subcontract is awarded on the basis of cost plus a fee, the Construction Manager shall provide in the subcontract for the Owner to receive the same audit rights with regard to the Subcontractor as the Owner receives with regard to the Construction Manager in Article 10. ARTICLE 10 ACCOUNTING RECORDS The Construction Manager shall keep full and detailed records and accounts related to the Cost of the Work, and exercise such controls, as may be necessary for proper financial management under this Contract and to substantiate all costs incurred. Without limiting the preceding sentence, the detailed records must include a record of all sales taxes paid by subcontractors for materials and supplies used in and equipment incorporated into the Project, together with supporting invoices that show the date of the taxable transaction, a description of the materials, supplies, or equipment on which sales tax was paid, the amount of sales tax paid, and the state to which the taxes were paid. The accounting and control systems shall be satisfactory to the Owner. The Owner and the Owner’s auditors shall, during regular business hours and upon reasonable notice, be afforded access to, and shall be permitted to audit and copy, the Construction Manager’s records and accounts, including complete documentation supporting accounting entries, books, job cost reports, correspondence, instructions, drawings, receipts, subcontracts, Subcontractor’s proposals, Subcontractor’s invoices, purchase orders, vouchers, memoranda, and other data relating to this Contract. The Construction Manager shall preserve these records for a period of three years after final payment, or for such longer period as may be required by law. All accounting records shall be maintained by the Construction Manager in accordance with generally accepted accounting procedures, consistently applied. Subcontractors retained by Construction Manager on a “cost-plus” basis with the Owner’s consent shall have the same obligations to retain records and cooperate with audits as required of the Construction Manager under this Section. If any inspection by the Owner or the Owner’s auditors of the Construction Manager’s accounting records reveals an overcharge, the Construction Manager shall promptly refund to the Owner the amount of the overcharge and shall reimburse Owner for its expenses incurred to audit the Construction Manager’s records. ARTICLE 11 PAYMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES § 11.1 Progress Payments § 11.1.1 Based upon Applications for Payment submitted to the Architect by the Construction Manager, and Certificates for Payment issued by the Architect, the Owner shall make progress payments on account of the Contract Sum, to the Construction Manager, as provided below and elsewhere in the Contract Documents. § 11.1.2 The period covered by each Application for Payment shall be one calendar month ending on the last day of the month, or as follows: 254 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 19 235737v2 « » § 11.1.3 Provided that an Application for Payment is received by the Architect not later than the «1st » day of a month, the Owner shall make payment of the amount certified to the Construction Manager not later than the «last » day of the «same » month. If an Application for Payment is received by the Architect after the application date fixed above, payment of the amount certified shall be made by the Owner not later than «thirty » ( «30 » ) days after the Architect receives the Application for Payment. Owner payment obligations to Construction Manager and Construction Manager payment obligation to the prime contractors shall be governed by the Municipal Prompt Payment Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.425, specifically including subdivision 4a requiring the Construction Manager to pay subcontractors within 10-days of receipt of payment. (Federal, state or local laws may require payment within a certain period of time.) § 11.1.4 With each Application for Payment, the Construction Manager shall submit payrolls, petty cash accounts, receipted invoices or invoices with check vouchers attached, and any other evidence required by the Owner or Architect to demonstrate that payments already made by the Construction Manager on account of the Cost of the Work equal or exceed progress payments already received by the Construction Manager, plus payrolls for the period covered by the present Application for Payment, less that portion of the progress payments attributable to the Construction Manager’s Fee. § 11.1.5 Each Application for Payment shall be based on the most recent schedule of values submitted by the Construction Manager in accordance with the Contract Documents. The schedule of values shall allocate the entire Guaranteed Maximum Price among: (1) the various portions of the Work; (2) any contingency for costs that are included in the Guaranteed Maximum Price but not otherwise allocated to another line item or included in a Change Order; and (3) the Construction Manager’s Fee. § 11.1.5.1 The schedule of values shall be prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the Architect may require. The schedule of values shall be used as a basis for reviewing the Construction Manager’s Applications for Payment. § 11.1.5.2 The allocation of the Guaranteed Maximum Price under this Section 11.1.5 shall not constitute a separate guaranteed maximum price for the Cost of the Work of each individual line item in the schedule of values. § 11.1.5.3 When the Construction Manager allocates costs from a contingency to another line item in the schedule of values, the Construction Manager shall submit supporting documentation to the Architect. § 11.1.6 Applications for Payment shall show the percentage of completion of each portion of the Work as of the end of the period covered by the Application for Payment. The percentage of completion shall be the lesser of (1) the percentage of that portion of the Work which has actually been completed, or (2) the percentage obtained by dividing (a) the expense that has actually been incurred by the Construction Manager on account of that portion of the Work and for which the Construction Manager has made payment or intends to make payment prior to the next Application for Payment, by (b) the share of the Guaranteed Maximum Price allocated to that portion of the Work in the schedule of values. § 11.1.7 In accordance with AIA Document A201–2017 and subject to other provisions of the Contract Documents, the amount of each progress payment shall be computed as follows: § 11.1.7.1 The amount of each progress payment shall first include: .1 That portion of the Guaranteed Maximum Price properly allocable to completed Work as determined by multiplying the percentage of completion of each portion of the Work by the share of the Guaranteed Maximum Price allocated to that portion of the Work in the most recent schedule of values; .2 That portion of the Guaranteed Maximum Price properly allocable to materials and equipment delivered and suitably stored at the site for subsequent incorporation in the completed construction or, if approved in writing in advance by the Owner, suitably stored off the site at a location agreed upon in writing; .3 That portion of Construction Change Directives that the Architect determines, in the Architect’s professional judgment, to be reasonably justified; and 255 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 20 235737v2 .4 The Construction Manager’s Fee, computed upon the Cost of the Work described in the preceding Sections 11.1.7.1.1 and 11.1.7.1.2 at the rate stated in Section 6.1.2 or, if the Construction Manager’s Fee is stated as a fixed sum in that Section, an amount that bears the same ratio to that fixed-sum fee as the Cost of the Work included in Sections 11.1.7.1.1 and 11.1.7.1.2 bears to a reasonable estimate of the probable Cost of the Work upon its completion. § 11.1.7.2 The amount of each progress payment shall then be reduced by: .1 The aggregate of any amounts previously paid by the Owner; .2 The amount, if any, for Work that remains uncorrected and for which the Architect has previously withheld a Certificate for Payment as provided in Article 9 of AIA Document A201–2017; .3 Any amount for which the Construction Manager does not intend to pay a Subcontractor or material supplier, unless the Work has been performed by others the Construction Manager intends to pay; .4 For Work performed or defects discovered since the last payment application, any amount for which the Architect may withhold payment, or nullify a Certificate of Payment in whole or in part, as provided in Article 9 of AIA Document A201–2017; .5 The shortfall, if any, indicated by the Construction Manager in the documentation required by Section 11.1.4 to substantiate prior Applications for Payment, or resulting from errors subsequently discovered by the Owner’s auditors in such documentation; and .6 Retainage withheld pursuant to Section 11.1.8. § 11.1.8 Retainage § 11.1.8.1 For each progress payment made prior to Substantial Completion of the Work, the Owner may withhold the following amount, as retainage, from the payment otherwise due: (Insert a percentage or amount to be withheld as retainage from each Application for Payment. The amount of retainage may be limited by governing law.) «Five percent (5%) » The Owner and the Construction Manager must comply with Minnesota Statutes Section 15.72 and Minnesota Statutes Section 337.10 regarding retainage payments. § 11.1.8.1.1 The following items are not subject to retainage: (Insert any items not subject to the withholding of retainage, such as general conditions, insurance, etc.) «None. » § 11.1.8.2 Reduction or limitation of retainage, if any, shall be as follows: (If the retainage established in Section 11.1.8.1 is to be modified prior to Substantial Completion of the entire Work, insert provisions for such modification.) « Retainage shall be reduced to 2.5 percent (2.5%) upon substantial completion. « » § 11.1.8.3 Except as set forth in this Section 11.1.8.3, upon Substantial Completion of the Work, the Construction Manager may submit an Application for Payment that includes the retainage withheld from prior Applications for Payment pursuant to this Section 11.1.8. The Application for Payment submitted at Substantial Completion shall not include retainage as follows: (Insert any other conditions for release of retainage, such as upon completion of the Owner’s audit and reconciliation, upon Substantial Completion.) « » § 11.1.9 If final completion of the Work is materially delayed through no fault of the Construction Manager, the Owner shall pay the Construction Manager any additional amounts in accordance with Article 9 of AIA Document A201–2017. 256 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 21 235737v2 § 11.1.10 Except with the Owner’s prior written approval, the Construction Manager shall not make advance payments to suppliers for materials or equipment which have not been delivered and suitably stored at the site. § 11.1.11 The Owner and the Construction Manager shall agree upon a mutually acceptable procedure for review and approval of payments to Subcontractors, and the percentage of retainage held on Subcontracts, and the Construction Manager shall execute subcontracts in accordance with those agreements. Upon Substantial Completion as defined by Minn. Stat. § 541.051, subd. 1(a), all retainages and other amounts due to Construction Manager shall be paid to Construction Manager in full less one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the reasonable estimated costs of any incomplete Work and unsettled Claims. Such withheld amount shall be paid to Construction Manager monthly as such incomplete Work is completed and Claims are settled in accordance with Minnesota law. § 11.1.12 In taking action on the Construction Manager’s Applications for Payment the Architect shall be entitled to rely on the accuracy and completeness of the information furnished by the Construction Manager, and such action shall not be deemed to be a representation that (1) the Architect has made a detailed examination, audit, or arithmetic verification, of the documentation submitted in accordance with Section 11.1.4 or other supporting data; (2) that the Architect has made exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections; or (3) that the Architect has made examinations to ascertain how or for what purposes the Construction Manager has used amounts previously paid on account of the Contract. Such examinations, audits, and verifications, if required by the Owner, will be performed by the Owner’s auditors acting in the sole interest of the Owner. § 11.2 Final Payment § 11.2.1 Final payment, constituting the entire unpaid balance of the Contract Sum, shall be made by the Owner to the Construction Manager when .1 the Construction Manager has fully performed the Contract, except for the Construction Manager’s responsibility to correct Work as provided in Article 12 of AIA Document A201–2017, and to satisfy other requirements, if any, which extend beyond final payment; .2 the Construction Manager has submitted a final accounting for the Cost of the Work and a final Application for Payment; .3 a final Certificate for Payment has been issued by the Architect in accordance with Section 11.2.2.2. .4 the Construction Manager has submitted as-built drawings required by the Contract Documents; .5 the Construction Manager has submitted all certifications, inspections and testing reports, operations and maintenance manuals, manufacturer, subcontractor and supplier warranties, and other close-out documentation required by the Contract Documents; and .6 the Construction Manager has submitted executed and notarized final releases of claims (including a release of claims against any bond for the Project), on Construction Manager’s own behalf and on behalf of all of its Subcontractors, suppliers and other vendors (of every tier), for all Work performed for the Project;. § 11.2.2 Within 30 days of the Owner’s receipt of the Construction Manager’s final accounting for the Cost of the Work, the Owner shall conduct an audit of the Cost of the Work or notify the Architect that it will not conduct an audit. § 11.2.2.1 If the Owner conducts an audit of the Cost of the Work, the Owner shall, within 10 days after completion of the audit, submit a written report based upon the auditors’ findings to the Architect. § 11.2.2.2 Within seven days after receipt of the written report described in Section 11.2.2.1, or receipt of notice that the Owner will not conduct an audit, and provided that the other conditions of Section 11.2.1 have been met, the Architect will either issue to the Owner a final Certificate for Payment with a copy to the Construction Manager, or notify the Construction Manager and Owner in writing of the Architect’s reasons for withholding a certificate as provided in Article 9 of AIA Document A201–2017. The time periods stated in this Section 11.2.2 supersede those stated in Article 9 of AIA Document A201–2017. The Architect is not responsible for verifying the accuracy of the Construction Manager’s final accounting. § 11.2.2.3 If the Owner’s auditors’ report concludes that the Cost of the Work, as substantiated by the Construction Manager’s final accounting, is less than claimed by the Construction Manager, the Construction Manager shall be 257 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 22 235737v2 entitled to request mediation of the disputed amount without seeking an initial decision pursuant to Article 15 of AIA Document A201–2017. A request for mediation shall be made by the Construction Manager within 30 days after the Construction Manager’s receipt of a copy of the Architect’s final Certificate for Payment. Failure to request mediation within this 30-day period shall result in the substantiated amount reported by the Owner’s auditors becoming binding on the Construction Manager. Pending a final resolution of the disputed amount, the Owner shall pay the Construction Manager the amount certified in the Architect’s final Certificate for Payment. § 11.2.3 The Owner’s final payment to the Construction Manager shall be made no later than 30 days after the issuance of the Architect’s final Certificate for Payment, or as follows: « » § 11.2.3.1 If Construction Manager fails to pay any Subcontractors or suppliers amounts owed under their subcontracts, the Owner shall have the right, but not the obligation, to pay the unpaid Subcontractors and suppliers directly and subtract the amount paid from the Contract Sum. § 11.2.3.2 Owner will at all times have the right to withhold from payment to the Construction Manager such amounts as may be necessary to protect the Owner from damages, costs, and expenses that have or may reasonably result from the Construction Manager’s negligence or breach of the Contract Documents. § 11.2.4 If, subsequent to final payment, and at the Owner’s request, the Construction Manager incurs costs, described in Sections 7.1 through 7.7, and not excluded by Section 7.9, to correct defective or nonconforming Work, the Owner shall reimburse the Construction Manager for such costs, and the Construction Manager’s Fee applicable thereto, on the same basis as if such costs had been incurred prior to final payment, but not in excess of the Guaranteed Maximum Price. If adjustments to the Contract Sum are provided for in Section 6.1.7, the amount of those adjustments shall be recalculated, taking into account any reimbursements made pursuant to this Section 11.2.4 in determining the net amount to be paid by the Owner to the Construction Manager. § 11.3 Interest Payments due and unpaid under the Contract shall bear interest from thirty (30) days after the date payment is due at the rate stated below. (Insert rate of interest agreed upon, if any.) « » % « » One and one-half percent (1.5% per month in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 471.425 Subd. 4. ARTICLE 12 DISPUTE RESOLUTION § 12.1 Initial Decision Maker § 12.1.1 Any Claim between the Owner and Construction Manager shall be resolved in accordance with the provisions set forth in this Article 12 and Article 15 of A201–2017. However, for Claims arising from or relating to the Construction Manager’s Preconstruction Phase services, no decision by the Initial Decision Maker shall be required as a condition precedent to mediation or binding dispute resolution, and Section 12.1.2 of this Agreement shall not apply. § 12.1.2 The Architect will serve as the Initial Decision Maker pursuant to Article 15 of AIA Document A201–2017 for Claims arising from or relating to the Construction Manager’s Construction Phase services, unless the parties appoint below another individual, not a party to the Agreement, to serve as the Initial Decision Maker. (If the parties mutually agree, insert the name, address and other contact information of the Initial Decision Maker, if other than the Architect.) « » « » « » « » § 12.2 Binding Dispute Resolution For any Claim subject to, but not resolved by mediation pursuant to Article 15 of AIA Document A201–2017, the method of binding dispute resolution shall be as follows: 258 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 23 235737v2 (Check the appropriate box.) [ « » ] Arbitration pursuant to Article 15 of AIA Document A201–2017 [ « X » ] Litigation in a court of competent jurisdiction [ « » ] Other: (Specify) « » If the Owner and Construction Manager do not select a method of binding dispute resolution, or do not subsequently agree in writing to a binding dispute resolution method other than litigation, Claims will be resolved by litigation in a court of competent jurisdiction. ARTICLE 13 TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION § 13.1 Termination Prior to Execution of the Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment § 13.1.1 If the Owner and the Construction Manager do not reach an agreement on the Guaranteed Maximum Price, the Owner may terminate this Agreement upon not less than seven days’ written notice to the Construction Manager, and the Construction Manager may terminate this Agreement, upon not less than seven days’ written notice to the Owner. § 13.1.2 In the event of termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 13.1.1, the Construction Manager shall be compensated for Preconstruction Phase services and Work performed prior to receipt of a notice of termination, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. In no event shall the Construction Manager’s compensation under this Section exceed the compensation set forth in Section 5.1. § 13.1.3 Prior to the execution of the Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment, the Owner may terminate this Agreement upon not less than seven days’ written notice to the Construction Manager for the Owner’s convenience and without cause, and the Construction Manager may terminate this Agreement, upon not less than seven days’ written notice to the Owner, for the reasons set forth in Article 14 of A201–2017. § 13.1.4 In the event of termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 13.1.3, the Construction Manager shall be equitably compensated for Preconstruction Phase services and Work performed prior to receipt of a notice of termination. In no event shall the Construction Manager’s compensation under this Section exceed the compensation set forth in Section 5.1. § 13.1.5 If the Owner terminates the Contract pursuant to Section 13.1.3 after the commencement of the Construction Phase but prior to the execution of the Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment, the Owner shall pay to the Construction Manager an amount calculated as follows, which amount shall be in addition to any compensation paid to the Construction Manager under Section 13.1.4: .1 Take the Cost of the Work incurred by the Construction Manager to the date of termination; .2 Add the Construction Manager’s Fee computed upon the Cost of the Work to the date of termination at the rate stated in Section 6.1 or, if the Construction Manager’s Fee is stated as a fixed sum in that Section, an amount that bears the same ratio to that fixed-sum Fee as the Cost of the Work at the time of termination bears to a reasonable estimate of the probable Cost of the Work upon its completion; and .3 Subtract the aggregate of previous payments made by the Owner for Construction Phase services. § 13.1.6 The Owner shall also pay the Construction Manager fair compensation, either by purchase or rental at the election of the Owner, for any equipment owned by the Construction Manager that the Owner elects to retain and that is not otherwise included in the Cost of the Work under Section 13.1.5.1. To the extent that the Owner elects to take legal assignment of subcontracts and purchase orders (including rental agreements), the Construction Manager shall, as a condition of receiving the payments referred to in this Article 13, execute and deliver all such papers and take all such steps, including the legal assignment of such subcontracts and other contractual rights of the Construction Manager, as the Owner may require for the purpose of fully vesting in the Owner the rights and benefits of the Construction Manager under such subcontracts or purchase orders. All Subcontracts, purchase orders and rental agreements entered into by the Construction Manager will contain provisions allowing for assignment to the Owner as described above. 259 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 24 235737v2 § 13.1.6.1 If the Owner accepts assignment of subcontracts, purchase orders or rental agreements as described above, the Owner will reimburse or indemnify the Construction Manager for all costs arising under the subcontract, purchase order or rental agreement, if those costs would have been reimbursable as Cost of the Work if the contract had not been terminated. If the Owner chooses not to accept assignment of any subcontract, purchase order or rental agreement that would have constituted a Cost of the Work had this agreement not been terminated, the Construction Manager will terminate the subcontract, purchase order or rental agreement and the Owner will pay the Construction Manager the costs necessarily incurred by the Construction Manager because of such termination. § 13.2 Termination or Suspension Following Execution of the Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment § 13.2.1 Termination The Contract may be terminated by the Owner or the Construction Manager as provided in Article 14 of AIA Document A201–2017. § 13.2.2 Termination by the Owner for Cause § 13.2.2.1 If the Owner terminates the Contract for cause as provided in Article 14 of AIA Document A201–2017, the amount, if any, to be paid to the Construction Manager under Article 14 of AIA Document A201–2017 shall not cause the Guaranteed Maximum Price to be exceeded, nor shall it exceed an amount calculated as follows: .1 Take the Cost of the Work incurred by the Construction Manager to the date of termination; .2 Add the Construction Manager’s Fee, computed upon the Cost of the Work to the date of termination at the rate stated in Section 6.1 or, if the Construction Manager’ Fee is stated as a fixed sum in that Section, an amount that bears the same ratio to that fixed-sum Fee as the Cost of the Work at the time of termination bears to a reasonable estimate of the probable Cost of the Work upon its completion; .3 Subtract the aggregate of previous payments made by the Owner; and .4 Subtract the costs and damages incurred, or to be incurred, by the Owner under Article 14 of AIA Document A201–2017. § 13.2.2.2 The Owner shall also pay the Construction Manager fair compensation, either by purchase or rental at the election of the Owner, for any equipment owned by the Construction Manager that the Owner elects to retain and that is not otherwise included in the Cost of the Work under Section 13.2.2.1.1. To the extent that the Owner elects to take legal assignment of subcontracts and purchase orders (including rental agreements), the Construction Manager shall, as a condition of receiving the payments referred to in this Article 13, execute and deliver all such papers and take all such steps, including the legal assignment of such subcontracts and other contractual rights of the Construction Manager, as the Owner may require for the purpose of fully vesting in the Owner the rights and benefits of the Construction Manager under such subcontracts or purchase orders. § 13.2.3 Termination by the Owner for Convenience If the Owner terminates the Contract for convenience in accordance with Article 14 of AIA Document A201–2017, then the Owner shall pay the Construction Manager a termination fee as follows: (Insert the amount of or method for determining the fee, if any, payable to the Construction Manager following a termination for the Owner’s convenience.) « » § 13.3 Suspension The Work may be suspended by the Owner as provided in Article 14 of AIA Document A201–2017; in such case, the Guaranteed Maximum Price and Contract Time shall be increased as provided in Article 14 of AIA Document A201– 2017, except that the term “profit” shall be understood to mean the Construction Manager’s Fee as described in Sections 6.1 and 6.3.5 of this Agreement. ARTICLE 14 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS § 14.1 Terms in this Agreement shall have the same meaning as those in A201–2017. Where reference is made in this Agreement to a provision of AIA Document A201–2017 or another Contract Document, the reference refers to that provision as amended or supplemented by other provisions of the Contract Documents. 260 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 25 235737v2 § 14.2 Successors and Assigns § 14.2.1 The Owner and Construction Manager, respectively, bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to covenants, agreements, and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. Except as provided in Section 14.2.2 of this Agreement, and in Section 13.2.2 of A201–2017, neither party to the Contract shall assign the Contract as a whole without written consent of the other. If either party attempts to make an assignment without such consent, that party shall nevertheless remain legally responsible for all obligations under the Contract. § 14.2.2 The Owner may, without consent of the Construction Manager, assign the Contract to a lender providing construction financing for the Project, if the lender assumes the Owner’s rights and obligations under the Contract Documents. The Construction Manager shall execute all consents reasonably required to facilitate the assignment. § 14.3 Insurance and Bonds § 14.3.1 The Construction Manager shall at all times during the term of this Agreement keep in force the following: a. Commercial general liability insurance. b. Professional liability insurance. c. Workers’ compensation insurance as required by Minnesota Statute. d. Builder’s Risk insurance and Builder’s Risk insurance on the Direct Purchase Materials naming the City as the insured or as an additional insured. The insurance required under this section shall be subject to review and approval of the Owner, and shall provide a minimum coverage of $5 million for commercial and builder’s risk, state statutory requirements for workers’ compensation and $5 million for professional liability. The Construction Manager will provide the City with certificates for the above policies, with the City named as an additional insured under the commercial general liability insurance, within sixty (60) days of execution of this Agreement and on or before January 1 each year for any policies that have changed during the previous calendar year. The City shall receive timely notification if any insurance policies required under the provisions of this Agreement are no longer maintained. § 8.2 Indemnification and Insurance. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Construction Manager shall indemnify and hold the Owner and the Owner’s officers and employees harmless from and against damages, losses and judgments, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses recoverable under applicable law, but only to the extent they are caused by the negligent acts, errors, omissions, or intentional misconduct of the Construction Manager, its employees and its consultants in providing the services under this Agreement. For claims that are covered by the Construction Manager’s commercial general liability or automobile liability insurance, the Construction Manager shall also be required to defend the Owner and the Owner’s officers and employees from claims by third parties. The Construction Manager further agrees that in order to protect itself as well as the Owner, under the indemnity provision set forth above, it will at all times during the term of this Agreement keep in force the following insurance coverages and minimum policy limits : 1) Commercial general liability $5 million each occurrence; and $10 million annual aggregate 2) Automobile liability $5 million combined single limit 3) Professional liability $5 million; $10,000,000 annual aggregate 4) Workers’ compensation as required by Minnesota Statute. The Construction Manager shall also carry Employers’ Liability Coverage with minimum limits as follows: • $1,000,000 – Bodily Injury by Disease per employee • $1,000,000 – Bodily Injury by Disease aggregate • $1,000,000 – Bodily Injury by Accident 261 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 26 235737v2 The required coverage may be met by use of umbrella/excess insurance. The Owner shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability and any umbrella policies on a primary and noncontributory basis. The insurance required under this section shall be subject to review and approval of the Owner, and shall meet statutory limits of liability for a City under Minn. Stat. § 466.04, other state statutory requirements, the value of property being insured, and the anticipated level of risk involved with the Project. The Construction Manager will provide the Owner with certificates for the above policies within sixty (60) days of execution of this Agreement and on or before January 1 each year, or the date upon which the policies expire each year, for any policies that have changed during the previous calendar year. The Owner shall receive timely notification if any insurance policies required under the provisions of this Agreement are no longer maintained. To the extent damages are covered by property insurance under a builder’s risk policy, the Owner and Construction Manager waive all rights against each other and against the contractors, consultants, agents and employees of the other for damages, except such rights as they may have to the proceeds of such insurance. The Owner or the Construction Manager, as appropriate, shall require of the contractors, consultants, agents and employees of any of them similar waivers in favor of the other parties enumerated herein. The Construction Manager and Owner waive consequential damages for claims, disputes or other matters in question arising out of or relating to this Agreement. This mutual waiver is applicable, without limitation, to all consequential damages due to either party’s termination of this Agreement. § 14.3.1.6 Other Insurance (List below any other insurance coverage to be provided by the Construction Manager and any applicable limits.) Coverage Limits RJM limits of insurance as per limits of RJM Certificate of Insurance. Excess Umbrella Liability – Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) § 14.3.1.7 Additional Insured Obligations. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Construction Manager shall cause the primary and excess or umbrella polices for Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability to include the Owner as an additional insured for claims caused in whole or in part by the Construction Manager’s negligent acts or omissions. The additional insured coverage shall be primary and non-contributory to any of the Owner’s insurance policies and shall apply to both ongoing and completed operations. § 14.3.1.8 The Construction Manager shall provide certificates of insurance to the Owner that evidence compliance with the requirements in this Section 14.3.1. § 14.3.2 Construction Phase After execution of the Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment, the Owner and the Construction Manager shall purchase and maintain insurance as set forth in AIA Document A133™–2019, Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager as Constructor where the basis of payment is the Cost of the Work Plus a Fee with a Guaranteed Maximum Price, Exhibit B, Insurance and Bonds, and elsewhere in the Contract Documents. § 14.3.2.1 The Construction Manager shall provide bonds as set forth in AIA Document A133™–2019 Exhibit B, and elsewhere in the Contract Documents. § 14.4 Notice in electronic format, pursuant to Article 1 of AIA Document A201–2017, may be given in accordance with AIA Document E203™–2013, Building Information Modeling and Digital Data Exhibit, if completed, or as otherwise set forth below: 262 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 27 235737v2 (If other than in accordance with AIA Document E203–2013, insert requirements for delivering notice in electronic format such as name, title, and email address of the recipient and whether and how the system will be required to generate a read receipt for the transmission.) « » § 14.5 Other provisions: «§ 14.5.1 Non-Discrimination. Construction Manager shall ensure that no person shall on the grounds of race, color, religions, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, handicap, familial status, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any scope of work carried out by Construction Manager or any Subcontractors of any tier. The Construction Manager agrees to be bound by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 181.59, that prohibits certain discriminatory practices and the terms of said section are incorporated into this Agreement. § 14.5.2 The Construction Manager, its Subcontractors and the Owner must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (“MGDPA”), Minnesota Statutes, Ch. 13, as it applies to all data provided by the Owner in accordance with this Contract and as it applies to all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Construction Manager in accordance with this Contract. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by the Construction Manager, its Subcontractors or the Owner. In the event the Construction Manager or its Subcontractors receive a request to release the data referred to in this clause, the Construction Manager must immediately notify the Owner. The Owner will give the Construction Manager instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. § 14.5.3 Pursuant to Minn. Stat., § 16C.05, subd. 5, Construction Manager agrees that the books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices of Construction Manager, that are relevant to the Contract Documents or transaction, are subject to examination by the Owner, the Owner’s auditor, and the state auditor for a minimum of six (6) years. Construction Manager shall maintain such records for a minimum of six (6) years after final payment. § 14.5.4 This Agreement supersedes any prior or contemporaneous representations or agreements, whether written or oral, between the Parties and contains the entire agreement. Any modification or amendment of to this Agreement shall require a written agreement signed by both Parties. In the hiring of employees to perform work under this Agreement, the Contractor shall not discriminate against any person by reason of any characteristic or classification protected by state or federal law. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. All proceedings related to this Agreement shall be venued in Hennepin County, Minnesota ARTICLE 15 SCOPE OF THE AGREEMENT § 15.1 This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the Owner and the Construction Manager and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both Owner and Construction Manager. § 15.2 The following documents comprise the Agreement: .1 AIA Document A133™–2019, Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager at Risk where the basis of payment is the Cost of the Work Plus a Fee with a Guaranteed Maximum Price, as modified. .2 AIA Document A133™-2019, Exhibit A, Guaranteed Maximum Price Amendment, as modified, if executed .3 AIA Document A133™–2019, Exhibit B, Insurance and Bonds, as modified .4 AIA Document A201™–2017, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, as modified .5 AIA Document E203™–2013, Building Information Modeling and Digital Data Exhibit, dated as indicated below: (Insert the date of the E203-2013 incorporated into this Agreement.) « » 263 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 28 235737v2 .6 Other Exhibits: (Check all boxes that apply.) [ « » ] AIA Document E234™–2019, Sustainable Projects Exhibit, Construction Manager as Constructor Edition, dated as indicated below: (Insert the date of the E234-2019 incorporated into this Agreement.) « » [ « » ] Supplementary and other Conditions of the Contract: Document Title Date Pages .7 Other documents, if any, listed below: (List here any additional documents that are intended to form part of the Contract Documents. AIA Document A201–2017 provides that the advertisement or invitation to bid, Instructions to Bidders, sample forms, the Construction Manager’s bid or proposal, portions of Addenda relating to bidding or proposal requirements, and other information furnished by the Owner in anticipation of receiving bids or proposals, are not part of the Contract Documents unless enumerated in this Agreement. Any such documents should be listed here only if intended to be part of the Contract Documents.) « » § 15.3 Other provisions: § 15.3.1 The Contractor shall comply with the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 471.425, subd. 4a, Prompt Payment to Contractor, which is incorporated herein by this reference. § 15.3.2 Disclosure of Information. All information, files, records, memoranda and other data of the Owner which the Owner provides to the Construction Manager of which the Construction Manager becomes aware of in the performance of its duties hereunder (“Owner Information”) shall be deemed by the parties to be the property of the Owner. The Owner may authorize the Construction Manager to disclose the Owner Information to third parties in connection with the performance of its duties hereunder if the data is classified as public, or is otherwise authorized, under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. § 15.3.3 Non-Discrimination. During the performance of this Agreement, the Construction Manager shall not discriminate against any employee or applicants for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, familial status, sexual orientation, status with regard to public assistance, disability or age. The Construction Manager shall post, in places available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this non¬discrimination clause and stating that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment. The Construction Manager shall incorporate the foregoing requirements of this section in all of its subcontracts and will require all of its subcontractors to incorporate’ such requirements in all subcontracts. § 15.3.4 Governing Law This agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year first written above. OWNER (Signature) CONSTRUCTION MANAGER (Signature) 264 AIA Document A133™ – 2019. Copyright © 1991, 2003, 2009, and 2019 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This draft was produced by AIA software at 14:19:06 ET on 02/24/2020 under Order No.6898725545 which expires on 08/08/2020, and is not for resale. User Notes: (959525200) 29 235737v2 « »« » « »« » (Printed name and title) (Printed name and title) 265 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Resolution XX-25 Accepting Donation from Level 7 Development, LLC File No.Item No: D.11 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION Approve Resolution XX-25 Accepting Donation from Level 7 Development, LLC Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY The Gift Agreement, approved by the City Council on May 5, 2025, is attached. The city closed on the purchase of the property for the Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center on September 4, 2025, and received the donation at closing. The gift is tax-deductible for Level 7. The city did not make any commitments to Level 7 related to the donation. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET 266 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution. ATTACHMENTS Resolution for Donation for Land Level 7 Gift Agreement 267 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: September 22, 2025 RESOLUTION NO: 2025-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION FROM LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT, LLC BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL hereby accepts a donation from Level 7 Development, LLC in the amount of $3,901,200.00. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 22nd day of September, 2025. ATTEST: Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 268 269 270 271 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Resolution 2025-XX; Authorize condemnation of land associated with the southerly extension of Laredo Drive File No.ENG 25-02 Item No: D.12 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves a resolution authorizing acquiring temporary and permanent easements over portions of PID number 254460010 associated with the southerly extension of Laredo Drive." Motion Type 2/3 Vote Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY The city is in negotiations with the property owner of 580 Market Boulevard (Market Street Station) to acquire the property needed for the southerly extension of Laredo Drive. This street extension was part of the approved Roers development. The city intends to acquire the propert by Decemember 31, 2025. Once the city acquires the property needed for the street extension by December 31, 2025, then Roers shall design and construct it according to the approved TIF agreement. Condemnation is a back stop for the city should the negotiations with the property owner are not successful in the time needed. BACKGROUND 272 N/A DISCUSSION N/A BUDGET N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approving the resolution authorizing the condemnation of the needed property. ATTACHMENTS Resolution Condemnation of Laredo Parcel Sketch 273 237267v1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE:_____September 22, 2025__________RESOLUTION NO: ___2025-XX___________ MOTION BY:____________________ SECONDED BY:__________________________ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION OF LAND FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chanhassen does hereby determine that it is necessary and for a public use and purpose to acquire permanent and temporary easements over the property legally described on the attached Exhibit “A”, subject to engineering modifications, if any, for purposes in connection with the Laredo Drive Extension Project; and WHEREAS, City staff and consultants have and will continue to work with the property owners to acquire the necessary easements; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that construction timing makes it necessary to acquire the necessary easements as soon as possible in order for the project to proceed in an efficient, cost effective and expeditious manner. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota: 1. That the City Attorney is authorized to commence eminent domain proceedings pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 117 to acquire the necessary permanent and temporary easements over the property identified on the attached Exhibit “A”, subject to engineering modifications, if needed. 2. That the City Attorney is authorized to acquire the necessary property interests pursuant to the “quick take” provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 117.042. 3. That the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute all documents necessary, in the opinion of the City Attorney, to effect the acquisition of the necessary property interests. 4. The City has obtained an appraisal of the property being acquired. The Council authorizes the City Engineer to approve the appraisal and staff to negotiate with the property owner relating to the acquisition of the property and to acquire the property for the appraised value. 274 237267v1 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 22rd day of September, 2025. ATTEST: ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 275 237267v1 EXHIBIT “A” Parcel 1. Lot 1, Block 1, Market Street Station, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Carver County, Minnesota, except that part lying Easterly, Southerly, Easterly and Northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the most southeasterly corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Market Street Station; thence North 00 degrees 08 minutes 32 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the most easterly line of said Lot 1 a distance of 147.78 feet; thence South 89 degrees 53 minutes 01 seconds West a distance of 102.49 feet; thence North 00 degrees 03 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 281.41 feet; thence South 89 degrees 56 minutes 40 seconds West a distance of 0.61 feet; thence North 00 degrees 03 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 1.14 feet; thence South 89 degrees 56 minutes 40 seconds West a distance of 4.10 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 00 degrees 03 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of 1.79 feet; thence North 89 degrees 56 minutes 40 seconds East a distance of 2.62 feet; thence South 00 degrees 03 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of 209.97 feet; thence North 89 degrees 56 minutes 40 seconds East a distance of 2.10 feet more or less to the intersection of the east line of said Lot 1 and said line there terminating, Carver County, Minnesota. Address: 580 Market Street, Chanhassen, MN 55317 PID: 25.4460010 276 NORTHDATE 07/01/2025277 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Resolution 2025-XX: Accept $528.01 Donation from Chaska Community Hockey Association for Community Day Sponsorship File No.Item No: D.13 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Jodi Sarles, Recreation Center Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution accepting a $528.01 donation from Chaska Community Hockey Association for Chanhassen Community Day." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Financial Sustainability SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION 278 ATTACHMENTS Resolution Accepting Donation from Chaska Community Hockey Association for Community Day 279 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: September 22, 2025 RESOLUTION NO: 2025-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION FROM CHASKA COMMUNITY HOCKEY ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY DAY BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby accepts the $528.01 donation from the Chaska Community Hockey Association for Community Day Sponsorship. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that city staff is hereby directed to prepare a letter to Chaska Community Hockey Association thanking them for their contribution. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 22nd day of September 2025. ATTEST: Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 280 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Resolution 2025-XX: Authorize Design and Construction Administration Services Contract for the 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance and the Red Cedar Point Drainage Improvement Projects File No.ENG Project No. 25-14 Item No: D.14 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Joe Seidl, Water Resources Engineer Reviewed By Charlie Howley SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution authorizing a contract with WSB and Associates, Inc. for performing the design and construction administration services for the 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance and Red Cedar Point Drainage Improvement Projects." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY This project is for annual stormwater infrastructure maintenance work. The project consists of nine distinct areas around the city prioritized by city staff using the asset management software Cartegraph. This project also includes two sites located in the Red Cedar Point area where drainage improvements are needed. BACKGROUND In 2020, city staff prepared a stormwater pond maintenance inventory, analysis, and prioritization plan. The city, via the MS4 permit, is obligated to maintain its stormwater management infrastructure. These annual projects, along with annual inspections, are the implementation activities of the permit 281 obligations. The Red Cedar Point drainage improvements are outlined in the City's Capital Improvement Plan and were programmed for 2021, but were not implemented due to competing priorities. Staff is combining this work with the annual Stormwater Pond Improvement project to save on budget and staff time. DISCUSSION The first step of the overall project process is to engage a design consultant as city staff does not have available capacity to perform all of the duties required to deliver the project. Staff developed a Request for Proposals (RFP) and sent it out to four (4) qualified consulting firms. City staff evaluated proposals that were received based on the requirements of the RFP which were based on the following criteria: Completeness of Proposal (20%) Experience of Firm and Personnel (15%) Resources to Complete the Project (15%) Fee (50%). The results of the evaluation and the associated fees are shown on the proposal evaluation form attached to this report. BUDGET This project budget is from CIP Project SWMP-032. The highest scoring proposal indicated a fee of $117,093 (including expenses). Total Project Budget = $525,000. Budget $525,000 Engineering Costs $117,093 Remaining Budget for Construction $407,907 The design and construction administration fee is inline with the project budget. The CIP sheet is attached to this report. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends authorizing a contract with WSB and Associates, Inc for the design and construction administration services for the 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance and the Red Cedar Point Drainage Improvement Projects. The contract is based on the City's standard professional services agreement. ATTACHMENTS Annual Stormwater Pond Project FY 2025 Budget RFP Exhibits 25-014_PROFESSIONAL_SERVICES_AGREEMENT WSB_2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services_Chanhassen 24-15_Pond Improvement Project Proposal Evaluation_Final 2025 Stormwater Pond and Red Cedar Point Drainage Improvement Project _RFP_WSB 282 283 284 285 286 Christmas Lake Lotus Lake Brendan Pond Lake Harrison Kerber Pond Lake Susan Lake Riley Lake Ann Lake Lucy ST18 ST14 ST15 ST17 Minnewashta Regional Park North Lotus Lake Park Meadow Green Park Lake Ann Park Chanhassen Pond Park Chanhassen Nature Preserve Chanhassen Recreation Center Lake Susan Park Rice Marsh Lake Preserve Power Hill Park Fox Woods Preserve Bandimere Community Park Bluff Creek Golf Course Lake Susan Preserve MN Landscape Arboretum Bluff Creek Preserve Independent School District 11 Independent School District 112 Independent School District 276 Riley Ridge Park Lake Ann Park Preserve SA101 SA7 SA41 SA5 SA41 )212 PowersBlvdAudubon RdLyman Blvd Pioneer TrlGalpinBlvd Market Bl vdPowers BlvdGre a tPlainsBlvdST101 LL-P10.7 CL-P1.7 LS-P3.18 Lotus Lake 1-26-1 Lotus Lake 7-1-1 Lake Susan 5-11-1 236 Hickory Road Drainage Improvement Red Cedar Point Drainage Improvement Document Path: K:\Departments\Engineering\Projects\24-15 Pond Improvement Project\24-15 Pond Improvement Project.aprxDate Created: 9/8/2025 Created By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department µ0 0.6 Mile 0 3,800 Feet 2025 Stormwater Pond and Red Cedar Point Drainage Improvement Project City of Chanhassen Legend 2025 Ponds 2025 Project Rivers Lakes Carver County Parks 287 Red Cedar Point Rd 950950 950 950 Red Cedar Point Area 1 - Red Cedar Point Road September 8, 2025 ± 1 in = 50 Ft Legend Parcels Preliminary Two Foot Contours - 2023 Contour_Type Index Intermediate 288 Cedar Cv Hickory Rd 266 950960 950950 950960 950960 960 950950950Red Cedar Point Area 2 - Hickory Road September 8, 2025 ± 1 in = 50 Ft Legend Private Storm Basins Parcels Preliminary Two Foot Contours - 2023 Contour_Type Index Intermediate 289 RedwingLnChaparralLnKerber Blvd PenamintCt NezPerce LL-P10.7 10 0 0 10101000 10 1 0 1000 1 0 0 0 1000101010 1 0 Pond LL-P10.7 Map September 9, 2025 ± 1 in = 100 Ft Legend City Storm BMPs City Storm Manholes City Storm Inlets Catch Basin Manhole Catch Basin Outlet Structure Other City Storm Discharge Points Standard Outlet City Storm Gravity Mains Storm Draintile City Storm Basins Parcels Preliminary Two Foot Contours - 2023 Contour_Type Index Intermediate 290 Stratton Ct Rd D e v o n s h ire D rStrattonCt DevonshireDrLake Lucy Rd CL-P1.7 CL-P1.6 CL-P1.5A 980 9901000 970 980 980 980 980 9909801000Pond CL-P1.7 Map September 9, 2025 ± 1 in = 100 Ft Legend City Storm BMPs City Storm Manholes City Storm Inlets Catch Basin Manhole Catch Basin Outlet Structure City Storm Discharge Points Standard Outlet City Storm Gravity Mains City Storm Basins Parcels Preliminary Two Foot Contours - 2023 Contour_Type Index Intermediate 291 ErieAveErieAveW 77th StFrontierTrl W 77th StErieAve950960970940930980950 960 960950950 960 960Pond Lotus Lake 7-1-1 Map September 9, 2025 ± 1 in = 100 Ft Legend City Storm BMPs City Storm Manholes City Storm Inlets Catch Basin Manhole Catch Basin Outlet Structure City Storm Discharge Points Standard Outlet City Storm Gravity Mains Parcels Preliminary Two Foot Contours - 2023 Contour_Type Index Intermediate 292 Carver Beach Rd Redwi ng L n P e n a m in tL n Carver Beach R PenamintLnPenamintCtLL-P10.710101000 1020 1010100 0 1010 1010101010 0 0 100 0 Pond Lotus Lake 1-26-1 Map September 9, 2025 ± 1 in = 100 Ft Legend City Storm BMPs City Storm Manholes City Storm Inlets Catch Basin Manhole Catch Basin Outlet Structure City Storm Discharge Points Standard Outlet City Storm Gravity Mains Storm Draintile City Storm Basins Parcels Preliminary Two Foot Contours - 2023 Contour_Type Index Intermediate 293 203 900 910890920 930920 900910890 900 890 930900920 920920 90090092 0 920 920 900900Pond Lake Susan 236 Map September 9, 2025 ± 1 in = 150 Ft Legend City Storm Manholes Carver County Storm Manholes City Storm Inlets Catch Basin Manhole Catch Basin Outlet Structure Carver County Storm Inlets Catch Basin Manhole Catch Basin City Storm Discharge Points Outfall Standard Outlet City Storm Gravity Mains Carver County Storm Gravity Mains Storm Draintile City Storm Culverts City Storm Basins Parcels Preliminary Two Foot Contours - 2023 Contour_Type Index Intermediate 294 930 940 9209109509 5 0 920 910 920 9109109 2 0 940920920940 940910 950 Ponds Lake Susan 5-11-1 and LS-P3.18 Map September 9, 2025 ± 1 in = 150 Ft Legend Private Storm Manholes MnDOT Storm Manholes City Storm Inlets Catch Basin Manhole Catch Basin Outlet Structure Private Storm Inlets Catch Basin Manhole Catch Basin Weir MnDOT Storm Inlets Catch Basin Manhole Catch Basin Outlet Structure City Storm Discharge Points Outfall Standard Outlet Private Storm Discharge Points Outfall Standard Outlet MnDOT Storm Discharge Points Standard Outlet City Storm Gravity Mains Private Storm Gravity Mains MnDOT Storm Gravity Mains City Storm Culverts Parcels Preliminary Two Foot Contours - 2023 Contour_Type Index Intermediate 295 1 201749v1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 22nd day of September, 2025, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and WSB and ASSOCIATES, Inc., a Minnesota corporation ("Consultant"). IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The City retains Consultant for the 2025 Stormwater Pond and Red Cedar Point Drainage Improvement Project Design and Construction Administration Services. 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents," all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Professional Services Agreement; B. Request for proposals – email dated September 9, 2025; C. Insurance Certificate; D. Consultant’s September 19, 2025, proposal for the 2025 Stormwater Pond and Red Cedar Point Drainage Improvement Project Design and Construction Administration Services (“Proposal”). In the event of conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts, with Contract Document “A” having the first priority and Contract Document “D” having the last priority. 3. COMPENSATION. Consultant shall be paid by the City for the services described in the Proposal a not to exceed fee of One Hundred Twelve Thousand-Two Hundred and Ninety- Three Dollars ($112,393.00), inclusive of expenses. Services performed directly by Consultant shall be paid at an hourly rate in accordance with the Proposal, subject to the not to exceed fee. The not to exceed fees and expenses shall not be adjusted if the estimated hours to perform a task, the number of required meetings, or any other estimate or assumption is exceeded. Consultant shall bill the City as the work progresses. Payment shall be made by the City within thirty-five (35) days of receipt of an invoice. 4. DOCUMENT OWNERSHIP. All reports, plans, models, diagrams, analyses, and information generated in connection with performance of this Agreement shall be the property of the City. The City may use the information for its purposes. The City acknowledges that all 296 2 201749v1 reports, plans, models, diagrams, analyses, and information generated in connection with performance of this Agreement are created solely for the specific project covered by this Agreement and may not be suitable for reuse on other projects. The City also acknowledges that reuse of the reports, plans, models, diagrams, analyses, and information generated in connection with performance of this Agreement without the written verification or adaptation by Consultant will be done at the City's sole risk and without liability to Consultant. 5. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders, regardless of amount, must be approved in advance and in writing by the City. No payment will be due or made for work done in advance of such approval. 6. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services hereunder, Consultant shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provisions of services to be provided. 7. STANDARD OF CARE. Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a professional consultant under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement. City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of Consultant’s services. 8. INDEMNIFICATION. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees, of and from any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, including costs and attorney's fees, to the extent caused by the Consultant’s negligent performance of the services provided for herein. 9. INSURANCE. Consultant shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect Consultant from claims under the Worker’s Compensation Acts, automobile liability, and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the negligent performance of services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than: Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate Automobile Liability $2,000,000 combined single limit Professional Liability $2,000,000 each claim/aggregate The City shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability policy on a primary and non- contributory basis. Before commencing work, the Consultant shall provide the City a certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverage in a form acceptable to City. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains Consultant as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Consultant shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Consultant shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Consultant’s performance under this 297 3 201749v1 Agreement. City and Consultant agree that Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Consultant shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Consultant’s own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 11. SUBCONTRACTORS. Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. Consultant shall comply with Minnesota Statutes § 471.425. Consultant must pay subcontractors for all undisputed services provided by subcontractors within ten (10) days of Consultant’s receipt of payment from City. Consultant must pay interest of one and five-tenths percent (1.5%) per month or any part of a month to subcontractors on any undisputed amount not paid on time to subcontractors. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) or more is Ten Dollars ($10.00). 12. CONTROLLING LAW/VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Carver County Minnesota. 13. MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Consultant must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event Consultant receives a request to release data, Consultant must immediately notify City. City will give Consultant instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Consultant’s officers’, agents’, city’s, partners’, employees’, volunteers’, assignees’ or subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 14. COPYRIGHT. Consultant shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or software license by reason of the use or adoption of any software, designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting therefrom. 15. PATENTED DEVICES, MATERIALS AND PROCESSES. If the Contract requires, or the Consultant desires, the use of any design, devise, material or process covered by letters, patent or copyright, trademark or trade name, the Consultant shall provide for such use by suitable legal agreement with the patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the City. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, the Consultant shall indemnify and 298 4 201749v1 hold harmless the City from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of an y such patented designed, device, material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in connection with the services agreed to be performed under the Contract, and shall indemnify and defend the City for any costs, liability, expenses and att orney's fees that result from any such infringement. 16. RECORDS. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records of hours worked and expenses involved in the performance of services. 17. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, or any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 18. WAIVER. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 20. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by the City for any reason or for convenience upon written notice to the Consultant. In the event of termination, the City shall be obligated to the Consultant for payment of amounts due and owing including payment for services performed or furnished to the date and time of termination. 21. WAIVER OF CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES. Neither party shall be liable to the other for loss of profits or revenue; loss of use or opportunity; loss of good will; co st of substitute facilities, goods, or services; cost of capital; or for any special, consequential, indirect, punitive, or exemplary damages. 299 5 201749v1 Dated: _______________, 2025. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: _____________________________________________ Elise Ryan, Mayor BY: _____________________________________________ Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Dated: _______________, 2025. WSB and ASSOCIATES, Inc. dba WSB BY: _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ Its _____________________________________________ 300 A PROPOSAL FOR 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services FOR THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN 301 701 XENIA AVE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 | TEL: 763.541.4800 | FAX: 763.541.1700 | WSBENG.COMSeptember 19, 2025 Mr. Joe Seidl, Water Resources Engineer City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services for the City of Chanhassen’s 2025 Stormwater Pond and Red Cedar Point Drainage Improvement Project Design and Construction Administration Services Dear Mr. Seidl, We are pleased to present this proposal for the City of 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Project. Our proposal focuses on our extensive experience assessing and maintaining stormwater ponds over the last 15 years. The WSB team has the knowledge and experience necessary to complete the requested work in a professional, timely, and cost-effective manner. Our project team includes Bill Alms, Project Manager, who has a passion for solving water resource-related problems and over ten years of successful experience managing stormwater BMP maintenance projects. Both Kendra Fallon and Alison Harwood will assist Bill throughout the project. We believe our team of water resources experts is ideally suited to meet your needs based on the following considerations: Pond Assessment and Maintenance Experience | The proposed project team has completed more than 500 pond assessments and hundreds of successful pond maintenance projects, including multiple projects within the City of Chanhassen. We understand the challenges of these types of projects and know to focus our attention on design details such as construction access, clearing and grubbing options, dewatering/deicing challenges, and measurement of dredged material. Understanding the challenges and variability of each unique pond allows us to have a reputation for delivering successful pond maintenance projects. Innovative Water Resources Expertise and Experience | Staff members at WSB have created and implemented unique designs for clients in Minnesota and the upper Midwest. Our designs are always tailored to meet the specific needs and characteristics for each client in a manner that helps them achieve their goals and meet their financial expectations. This experience allows WSB to anticipate and respond to challenges that arise during both project design and during construction. Commitment to Communication | Our project team is committed to listening to your concerns and working with you to develop solutions to meet the City’s unique needs. It is very important to WSB that the City is more than satisfied with the design process and the resulting project implementation. The City and WSB staff have established a long-standing, trusted relationship working collaboratively to solve water resources issues and protect our natural resources. We look forward to contributing to the City’s continued success and thank you for the opportunity to submit our proposal. Please feel free to contact either of us to discuss our next steps together. Sincerely, WSB Bill Alms, PE Earth Evans, PE Project Manager Director of Water Resources 302 Firm Overview | 2Proposal for 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services Forge ahead. WSB is a design and consulting firm specializing in engineering, community planning, environmental, and construction services. Together, our staff improves the way people engage with communities, transportation, infrastructure, energy and our environment. We offer services that seamlessly integrate planning, design and implementation. We share a vision to connect your dreams for tomorrow to the needs of today— the future is ours for the making. Firm Overview 1,500+ STAFF 50+ SERVICE AREAS 50 OFFICES 10 STATES Alternative Project Delivery | Asset Management | Biogas | Bridges & Structures | City Engineering | Community Planning | Constructability Review | Construction Materials Testing & Special Inspection | Contractor Modeling | Drinking Water | Economic Development | Environmental Compliance | Geohazard Risk Management | Geospatial | Geotechnical Engineering | GIS Services | Grants & Funding | Health & Safety Compliance | Intelligent Transportation Systems | Investigation & Remediation | Land Development | Landscape Architecture | Managed Services | Natural Resources | Pavement Management | Pipeline | Project Management & Construction Administration | Public Engagement | Public Works Management | Right of Way | Roadway Design | Smart Cities | Solar | Survey | Sustainability | Technology Solutions | Traffic Engineering | Transit Planning | Transportation Planning | Urban Design | Vibration Monitoring | Visualizations | Water Resources | Water Reuse | Wind 303 701 XENIA AVE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 | TEL: 763.541.4800 | FAX: 763.541.1700 | WSBENG.COMTABLE OF CONTENTS Firm Overview ..................................................2 Statement of Understanding ..........................3 Approach and Methodology ...........................5 Schedule .........................................................12 Firm Information .............................................13 Firm Information - Project Examples .............14 Key Personnel .................................................16 Fee ...................................................................19 References ......................................................21 304 Statement of Understanding | 3Proposal for 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services Statement of Understanding This project involves completing sediment surveys, functional assessments, and construction documents for seven stormwater basins within the City of Chanhassen and two drainage improvements within the Red Cedar Point Area. Basins that have been identified as requiring maintenance, due to a significant degradation in their treatment performance, will require bathymetric surveys to confirm excavation quantities, preparation of plans and bid documents, and construction observation for the recommended maintenance activities in 2025. The work under this scope of services will include five new and two updated feasibility memorandums outlining the sediment sampling results and maintenance recommendations and designing and overseeing construction on an estimated 5 project sites as budget allows. We understand the estimated budget for 2025 Pond Maintenance Project is $525,000. We estimate the construction cost to complete maintenance on all seven basins could range between $585,000 to $935,000 dependent upon sediment testing results to achieve the managed depth listed in SWAMP. The cost for the Red Cedar Point Drainage Improvement options selected would be in addition to these cost. WSB will assess the seven basins identified and utilize our experience to determine the optimized maintenance recommendation to fit within the City’s budget and achieve the greatest cost benefit. 305 Statement of Understanding | 4Proposal for 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services BASIN ID OCI/SWAMP SCORE AREA (AC)ESTIMATED YEARS SINCE CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATED EXCAVATION VOLUME (CY) LL-P10.7 12 0.7 46 1620 CL-P1.7 38 0.5 37 680 LOTUS LAKE 7-1-1 35 0.1 UNKNOWN 330 LOTUS LAKE 1-26-1 50 0.3 46 1110 BASIN 236 83 1.3 32 1050 LAKE SUSAN 5-11-1 23 1.0 45 5820 LS-P3.18 28 1.2 45 6070 * ESTIMATED VOLUMES IN TABLE ARE VOLUMES TO ACHIEVE MANAGED VOLUME AND NOTED AS COMPACT VOLUME. This project will require a team of experts who have extensive experience performing pond assessment and maintenance projects to prevent costly mistakes that can occur throughout the course of the project. This project will also require experience to facilitate a smooth permitting process with environmental permitting agencies. The selected consultant will need experience working with partner local agencies to anticipate questions and issues and be able to communicate effectively and timely to ensure the project’s success with the best outcomes. THE FOLLOWING TABLE OUTLINES KEY ATTRIBUTES OF THE BASINS SELECTED FOR SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT: 306 Approach and Methodology | 5Proposal for 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services Approach and Methodology THESE PROJECT GOALS DEFINE OUR PROCESS AND TASKS: Effective basin assessment techniques and reporting methods, provide more performance-enhancing and cost-effective decision-making capability to our clients. Capitalizing on efficiencies throughout the assessment, design, and construction process allows us to keep design costs low while still providing high-quality results, in a timely manner. Positive relationships with many pond maintenance contractors ensure high expectations of project success and optimal bidding results. 307 Approach and Methodology | 6Proposal for 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services TASK 1: Preparation of Pond Feasibility Memorandums This task includes developing preliminary design memorandums for each of the seven ponds identified for possible maintenance and the two project sites located in the Red Cedar Point area. These memorandums will use information obtained from the City collected bathymetric surveys, WSB verification surveys on the five new basins, sediment testing, as well as information from background data including as-builts, plats, and site visits with the City Staff to help determine the scope of the maintenance to be completed. Red Cedar Point area sites will include topographic survey of the project area boundaries and wetland delineations of any fringe wetlands along Lake Minnewashta and the 2011 Street Reconstruction design information previously completed by WSB. Feasibility Memorandum will include: -Providing a cost-benefit analysis for varying excavation quantities for each pond to maximize the water quality benefit, and rate control and flood protection if applicable. -Identifying any additional pond improvements recommended beyond simply sediment removal (inlet/outlet repair, vegetation removal, etc.) -A sediment sampling summary that will include BaP equivalence calculations for cPAH data, sample location maps, and tabular laboratory data. -Identifying all permitting requirements for each pond including noting if any ponds would require a wetland delineation. -Identifying ideal access location for each of the ponds and construction limits based on plat and easement documents provided by the City. -Maintenance recommendations and schedule updates as necessary. 308 Approach and Methodology | 7Proposal for 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services As part of the feasibility memorandums for the seven basins identified, WSB will complete sediment sampling and analysis on the five basins not previously tested to determine the appropriate sediment disposal methods. Sediment sampling will consist of two representative samples from the area identified for maintenance if that basin is less than one acre, and one sample per acre and per partial acre for basins between one and four acres. The work will be completed in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s (MPCA) Managing Stormwater Sediment Best Management Practice Guidance. The results of the analyses will be compared to the MPCA Tier 1 and Tier 2 Soil Reference Values to provide guidance related to the management and disposal of the dredged materials. Stormwater sediment will be collected and analyzed for the following parameters: -Carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (cPAHs and PAHs) using approved EPA Method 8270. -Copper using approved EPA Method 6010. -RCRA Metals (which includes arsenic) using EPA Method 6010. -We recommend including all RCRA metals in our testing as many landfills require this and it ultimately saves costs if an issue is present. This is also recommended by MPCA staff even though it is not an official requirement. If the City prefers to only test for arsenic, then we will honor that request. -Total Phosphorus. Sample handling and processing will adhere to the MPCA’s Guidance. Decontamination of re-usable sampling tools will be completed between sampling points. Project documentation will include a collection of GIS for sampling locations, total sample depth, and photographs. WSB will use PACE Labs to complete the laboratory analysis of the sediment samples collected. A cost of approximately $429 per sediment sample is anticipated based on the current lab price list. We are assuming a $50/sample expedited fee in order to help achieve the City’s requested schedule. These lab costs will be passed on to the City with no markup. 309 Approach and Methodology | 8Proposal for 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services Based on the five ponds identified for testing, it is estimated that up to ten samples may be required depending on the inspection results. A cost-benefit analysis will be completed using the City’s SWAMP for each of the pond maintenance projects to determine the optimal amount of material to be excavated from each basin to meet the City stormwater management goals. Capitalizing on our experience performing pond assessments and expertise with the City’s SWAMP, we have created an extremely efficient process to perform these analyses. This is a critical step in the maintenance evaluation process to ensure the City’s maintenance dollars are being utilized as effectively as possible. An excavation recommendation will be included for the City’s consideration for each of the seven ponds. The Red Cedar Point neighborhood was reconstructed by WSB in 2011. We are very familiar with the challenging constraints within this neighborhood. A Feasibility Memo will be prepared for the two drainage improvement sites within the Red Cedar Point neighborhood—Red Cedar Point Road and Hickory Road—focused on enhancing stormwater conveyance and water quality treatment. The memo will assess existing conditions, including limited space and minimal vertical separation between the roadway and Lake Minnewashta’s OHWL (less than 2.5 feet), and will evaluate feasible solutions such as filtration swales or vegetated pavement. More complex alternatives, including storm sewer extensions or full roadway reconstruction, are excluded due to cost and permitting constraints. The memorandum will include conceptual options, pollutant reduction potential, cost and permitting considerations, and long-term maintenance recommendations, with special attention to innovative and accessible solutions for Hickory Road. ADDITIONAL SERVICES NOTES: -Due to the accelerated project schedule we assume that all ponds will need to have a detailed bathymetric survey completed within the first week of project authorization. This will provide better data for the pond feasibility memorandums and result in project efficiencies of collecting survey at the time of sediment sampling. It is assumed that LL-P10.7 and CL-P1.7 will not require updated survey or sediment testing from 2024. -WSB has been successful working with the Watershed Districts, WCA LGU, and the Army Corps of engineers in Chanhassen to obtain no-loss exemptions for routine pond maintenance with Wetland Delineations. We have included a detailed topographic survey, wetland delineations of fringe wetlands, and TEP approval for the two Red Cedar Point Areas. -All of the basins appear to be constructed stormwater ponds and not public waters or wetlands. -The two feasibility memos previously completed in 2024 by WSB on basins CL P1.7 and LL P10.7 will be reviewed and updated as needed. DELIVERABLES: SEVEN POND FEASIBILITY MEMORANDUMS, FIVE POND BATHYMETRIC SURVEYS, POND SEDIMENT TESTING SPREADSHEET, RED CEDAR POINT PROJECT AREA TOPO SURVEY, WETLAND DELINEATION, AND FEASIBILITY MEMO. 310 Approach and Methodology | 9Proposal for 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services TASK 2: Preliminary Design, Final Design, and Permitting 2.2 – Final Design and Construction Documents This task includes updating preliminary design construction documents based on input received from project stakeholders and City staff. A final construction cost estimate will be developed to reflect any changes from 60% to 100% design. It is important to note that this task does not include negotiating site access with property owners and obtaining temporary easements or right-of-entry, however, we can assist with this as needed. 2.3 – Permitting WSB will identify all permits needed and will prepare and submit all application materials on behalf of City staff in applying for the necessary permits. This will include all necessary plans, exhibits, descriptions, and calculations. This scope assumes that the two Red Cedar Point project areas will not trigger waterbodies and crossings, work in public waters or wetland impact and replacement permits. If additional permitting is required on the Red Cedar Point project areas by MCWD given that they are beyond the scope of standard pond maintenance, this may delay the bidding schedule included in the proposal. This delay may be mitigated if the City chooses to separate the projects into two separate bid packages and permits. 2.1 – Preliminary Design 60% plans will be developed using pond inspection/ survey data and feasibility report recommendations. As noted in the previous task WSB is planning to completed detailed bathymetric survey for the five new pond maintenance locations and detailed topographic survey and wetland delineation for the two Red Cedar Point areas during the feasibility review due to the accelerated time line. Plans are anticipated to include a cover sheet, notes/details, grading/drainage plan, erosion control, restoration plan, and site access/traffic control for each basin identified. In addition, an updated cost estimate will be developed to verify consistency between the proposed improvements and the City’s budget. This scope assumes the City will facilitate resident communications and mailings. WSB can assist by providing project information summaries and figures. This scope assumes that the two Red Cedar Point project areas will be included among the five sites selected for preliminary design and incorporated into the same bid package as the 2025 pond maintenance projects. Alternatively, the City may choose to separate the Red Cedar Point drainage improvements from the pond maintenance work. If that approach is pursued, WSB will coordinate with the City to determine whether an additional scope is needed to prepare two separate bid packages following completion of the feasibility studies and confirmation of the final scope of work. The following ponds are potentially included: LL-P10.7, CL-P1.7, Lotus Lake 7-1-1, Lotus Lake 1-26-1, Basin 236, Lake Susan 5-11-1, LS-P3.18 and two Red Cedar Point project areas. 311 Approach and Methodology | 10Proposal for 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services TASK 3: Bidding Services This scope assumes the preparation of all necessary bid documents as well as answering questions during the bid process to help facilitate the understanding of construction expectations. It also includes attendance at pre-bid meetings if required, administering the online bid opening via QuestCDN and preparing a bid tabulation and recommendation for contract award. DELIVERABLES: PAY REQUESTS, CHANGE ORDERS (AS NECESSARY), CLOSEOUT DOCUMENTS, PUNCH LISTS, RECORD DRAWINGS (CAD AND PDF) Some of the anticipated potential permits include: -RPBCWD – Erosion Control and Wetland Protection -Six basins are located within RPBCWD being LL-P10.7, Lotus Lake 7-1-1, Lotus Lake 1-26-1, Basin 236, Lake Susan 5-11-1, and LS-P3.18 -MCWD - Erosion Control and Wetlands Buffers -Basin CL-P1.7 and the two Red Cedar Point project areas are located within MCWD. -City ROW Permits (or including in specifications that Contractor is responsible) -WCA No-Loss -Army Corps Permits DELIVERABLES: BID DOCUMENTS DELIVERABLES: 60% PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, PERMIT APPLICATION INFORMATION, 100% PLANS/SPECIFICATIONS TASK 4: Construction Administration WSB will provide on-site construction management during the construction of the proposed maintenance/ improvements. This will include the following activities: • Prepare for and attend pre-construction meetings with the City and Contractor • Perform construction staking • Review and approve any required submittals • Part-time construction observation to oversee construction operations at key points of the project (assume 160 hours) • Attend weekly construction meetings as needed over the construction period • Perform post-construction survey and provide final as-built plans to the City in PDF and CAD format • Prepare quantities, pay requests, change orders, and closeout documents • Attend the final walk-through inspection and prepare punch list 312 Approach and Methodology | 11Proposal for 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services Project Communications Successful project delivery requires strong lines of communication and collaboration, both with the client and with the team members. WSB will hold meetings, as detailed in task 5, to discuss project progress, seek feedback from City staff on proposed approach, and discuss next steps to keep the project moving smoothly though each project milestone. WSB uses several technology methods to allow for the smooth flow of information. We embrace the development and use of new technologies to provide the highest level of communication between the City, WSB, and contractors. Our team is highly trained in our in-house project control software, Deltek, and PowerBI project management tools. These tools are designed to maintain effective client communication, adjust staffing and resources, prepare detailed reports, meet project deadlines, and remain within schedule and budget. TASK 5: Project Management and Meetings Project management will be performed throughout the course of the project by WSB’s Project Manager, Bill Alms. Project management will include attending meetings (developing agendas, preparing handouts/ graphics, and completing minutes as necessary), regular communication with the City and project stakeholders, and management of the staff and budget. This scope assumes the following meetings: • Kickoff meeting with the City • Meeting with City staff to review 60% Preliminary Design Report and site plans • Meeting with City staff to review 100% Final Design Report and site plans • Regular check-in calls/updates with the City Project Manager • Pre-application meetings with RPBCWD and/ or MCWD to confirm permitting requirements (dependent on ponds selected for maintenance projects) 313 Schedule | 12Proposal for 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services Schedule TASK ID | TASK DESCRIPTION 2025 2026 SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR Contract Award - Notice to Proceed 1.0 PREPARATION OF POND FEASIBILITY MEMORANDUMS (9 PONDS) 1.1 Sediment Sample Collection & Reporting 1.2 Bathymetric Survey of Ponds 1.3 Wetland Delination & Topo Survey 1.4 Develop Pond Feasibility Memo 2.0 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, PERMITTING 2.1 Preliminary Design and Engineering Report 2.2 Permitting RPBCWD Erosion Control ( 2-3 Weeks) MCWD 2.2*MCWD or RPBCWD Full Permitting if required* (6-9 weeks) 2.3 Final Design and Engineering Report 3.0 BIDDING 3.1 Bidding Documents and Administration 4.0 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 4.1 Construction Administration and Meetings 4.2 Construction Observation (Part-time) 4.3 Construction Staking 4.4 As-Built Survey & Record Drawings 5.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND MEETINGS 5.1 Kickoff Meeting with City Staff 5.2 60% Plans and Engineering Report Review 5.3 100% Plans and Engineering Report Review 5.4 RPBCWD Pre-Application Meeting B CA ADVERTISE BIDS OPEN BIDS COUNCIL AWARD PRECONSTRUCTION MEETINGABCD D Preliminary Schedule 11/6, 13,& 20 11/25/25 12/8/25 The schedule below has been prepared based on information received from the City and shows the most aggressive schedule. We will work with the City to modify the schedule as necessary to meet their needs. Based on favorable consideration of our proposal, we would immediately schedule a kickoff meeting and sediment sampling (within one week). Ideal conditions for pond excavation projects are typically from January to March depending on the length of the winter season. 314 Firm Information | 13Proposal for 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services Firm Information WSB’s project team is extremely proficient at completing pond assessments and maintenance projects similar to what the City is requesting. Our project team has completed over 500 pond assessments and over 100 successful pond maintenance projects in the last 10 years, including over a dozen projects within the City of Chanhassen. The map below highlights the many areas where the proposed project team has completed pond assessments and pond maintenance projects. Completed pond maintenance projects and assessments METRO AREA EXPERIENCE Completed pond assessments MississippiRiverSt.CroixRi ver M i n n e so t a Rive rC a n n o nRiv e rro wRive rLINO LAKES CICLE PINES WAYZATA STILLWATER NORTH ST. PAUL MAHTOMEDI FRIDLEY APPLE VALLEY BLAINE BROOKLYN CENTER MAPLE GROVE PLYMOUTH HANOVER ST. MICHAEL COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ST. ANTHONY GOLDEN VALLEY ST. LOUIS PARK BLOOMINGTON MINNETRISTA SHOREWOOD CHANHASSEN VICTORIA SHAKOPEE & SMSC BURNSVILLE SAVAGE PRIOR LAKE LAKEVILLE ROSEMOUNT WEST ST. PAUL SOUTH ST. PAUL WOODBURY ROSEVILLE WYOMING CHAMPLIN HUGO 494 694 94 94 35 35 169 10 52 10 212 12 ects and assessments 315 Firm Information - Project Examples | 14Proposal for 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services Chanhassen Pond Maintenance Projects CLIENT: CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROJECT DURATION: 01/2021 - PRESENT WSB has worked with the City of Chanhassen to perform their annual Pond Maintenance and Drainage improvement projects. These project consist of design and construction administrative services for several pond cleanouts and other drainage improvements within the City of Chanhassen. Results from pond bathymetric surveys, sediment sampling, HydroCAD modeling updates and a review of background data are combined to create feasibility memos for five to ten ponds each year and includes work for ravines, rain gardens, and forebay maintenance. Projects include extensive coordination with RPBCWD was required to permit the improvements through the District. Additional wetland permitting is completed each yearin line with WCA and Army Corps of Engineers requirements. WSB leads construction administration on the projects and has a strong history of working through multiple challenges as they arise during construction to keep these projects on track. Frequent communication and documentation with the contractor and the City are required to maintain expectations and deliver a final project outcome all parties are comfortable with. ENGINEERING COST: $70 - 90K ANNUALLY CONSTRUCTION COST: $400 - 650K ANNUALLY Brooklyn Center Pond Maintenance Projects CLIENT: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROJECT DURATION: 09/2016 – PRESENT WSB has worked with the City of Brooklyn Center since 2016 on their annual pond maintenance projects. In 2016, WSB helped the City develop a program that identified a five-year plan that prioritized survey activities and subsequently prioritized maintenance needs. The City then programmed the projects into their CIP. Each year WSB completes bathymetric surveys and pond assessments to determine the extent of each pond maintenance project. Cost benefit analyses are completed to determine the optimal amount of material to be dredged in order to meet the stormwater needs of the City. Pond design memos are completed that outline the cost-benefit analysis as well as identify construction access, clearing and grubbing needs, and permitting requirements. Sediment testing and analysis is completed to determine the appropriate method of disposal. Construction plans and specifications are developed and tailored to meet the unique characteristics of each year’s ponds. WCA coordination, Army Corps permitting, and DNR permitting is completed as required. Construction observation and staking is performed to ensure the construction is consistent with the plans and specifications and that the project achieves the desired outcomes of the City. ENGINEERING COST: $30-45K ANNUALLY CONSTRUCTION COST: $150K-300K ANNUALLY 316 Firm Information - Project Examples | 15Proposal for 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services Burnsville Pond Maintenance Projects CLIENT: CITY OF BURNSVILLE PROJECT DURATION: 06/2013 – PRESENT These projects are completed annually and generally involve the same steps to result in a successful project. Each year the City and WSB review the City’s priority basins to be surveyed. Following the bathymetric surveys, it can then be determined which basins need to be maintained and the extent of maintenance to achieve the stormwater goals of the City. Cost-benefit analyses are completed during the completion of the pond design memos to determine the optimal amount of maintenance/dredging to be completed. In addition, the pond design memos include construction access investigation, clearing and grubbing needs, and permitting requirements. Sediment testing and analysis is completed to determine the appropriate disposal requirements. Construction plans and specifications are developed and tailored to meet the unique characteristics of each years’ ponds. WCA coordination, Army Corps permitting, and DNR permitting is completed as required. Construction observation is performed to ensure the construction is consistent with the plans and specifications and that the project achieves the desired outcomes of the City. ENGINEERING COST: $35-50K ANNUALLY CONSTRUCTION COST: $350K-400K ANNUALLY ALIMAGNET POND FILTER RETROFIT 317 Key Personnel | 16Proposal for 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services Bill Alms, PE PROJECT MANAGER Bill is a project manager in WSB’s Water Resources Group with over 17 years of experience serving clients with their water resources engineering needs. Bill’s experience includes planning, design, and construction management for a wide range of water resource proj-ectsincluding water quality treatment BMPs and erosion stabilization. He has experience with shared green and low impact developments utilizing standard and alternative storm management systems, above and below ground infiltration, filtration and detention systems, and rainwater harvesting and reuse. Bill is currently leading a pond maintenance research project with the University of Minnesota and the Local Road Research Board. Key Personnel At WSB, our project approach begins with establishing a team with expertise gained from experience with similar projects. Team members enjoy working together and collectively tackling the challenges associated with each project. We have provided the proposed structure of the team and capsules for key team members which detail their roles and related experience below. City of Chanhassen Joe Seidl Bill Alms, PE PROJECT MANAGER Kendra Fallon PROJECT ENGINEER Alison Harwood PERMITTING SPECIALIST Sarah Loberg GRADUATE ENGINEER / CAD TECHNICIAN Dan O’Neil FIELD TECHNICIAN 318 Key Personnel | 17Proposal for 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services Kendra Fallon, PE PROJECT ENGINEER Kendra is a Graduate Engineer with over eight year of water resources engineering experience. Kendra has experience with hydrologic and hydraulic modeling and water quality modeling, designing and managing pond restoration projects, storm sewer design, interpreting and reviewing for City stormwater requirements, and writing state and local agency permit applications. She has experience working with a variety of software including HydroCAD, GIS, P8, MIDS Calculator, Civil 3D and all Microsoft Office programs to help meet and exceed clients’ expectations. Alison Harwood PERMITTING SPECIALIST Alison is a certified wetland delineator in Minnesota (No. 1238) and has performed numerous wetland delineations and environmental assessments across Minnesota and the Midwest. Alison has experience completing the permit applications necessary for pond sediment removal, including those to obtain US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permits, Wetland Conservation Act approvals, and Watershed District approvals. She also has obtained DNR Public Waters Permits. Sarah Loberg GRADUATE ENGINEER / CAD TECH Sara is experienced in CAD 3D surface modeling and plan production. She also has experience taking various environmental media samples and analyzing the information. Sarah has been responsible for writing technical reports like Environmental Site Assessments, Limited Site Investigations, wetland delineations, SWPPPs, and final reports. This work included gathering information via fieldwork and surveying, managing and manipulating data, translating data into useful information via AutoCAD, GIS, and Microsoft Office, and creating a report to give to clients. She has experience as an inspector on previous Chanhassen pond maintenance projects as well as other drainage improvement projects. This included coordinating with contractors and project managers to provide quality assurance and ensure standards and specifications were met. Dan O’Neil FIELD TECHNICIAN Dan has over eight years of experience in WSB’s water resources group. He is the field specialist responsible for various types of monitoring, sediment sampling, and pond/BMP surveys. He has completed over 400 pond surveys and assessments and is extremely thorough and takes pride in bringing accurate information from the field to the office. 319 Key Personnel | 18Proposal for 2022 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services Staff Availability and Commitment WSB recognizes that exceeding our clients’ expectations on each and every project is the single most important factor in achieving client satisfaction. Therefore, we place maximum emphasis on understanding the client’s needs, matching the expertise and experience of each team member to the needs of the project, and delivering the project on time and on budget for the scope of services that was proposed. WSB commits that the staff members listed on the organization chart will be available to successfully complete this project. All WSB team members are located here in the Twin Cities metropolitan. Client and stakeholder meetings and coordination efforts will be based from the WSB Golden Valley office location. 320 Fee | 19Proposal for 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services Fee Reimbursable Expenses Task Description 1 Task 1 1.1 Sediment Sample Collection and Reporting (5 Ponds) *2 8 10 $4,800.00 $6,132.00 1.2 Bathymetric Survey of 5 Ponds and Red Cedar Point Topo Survey 4 8 32 12 56 $9,412.00 1.3 Red Cedar Point Wetland Delineation (Level 2) & TEP Approval 6 36 42 $5,340.00 1.4 Develop Pond Feasibility Memos (5 New / 2 Updates)6 8 48 62 $10,850.00 * Lab analytical cost of approximately $480 per sediment sample will be passed on to the City with no mark up. Task 1 Total Estimated Hours and Fee 6 12 6 36 58 40 12 0 170 $4,800.00 $31,734.00 2 Task 2 2.2 Preliminary Design 12 20 50 2 84 $15,228.00 2.3 Final Design 8 14 25 6 53 $9,390.00 2.4 Permitting 8 4 28 4 44 $6,224.00 Task 2 Total Estimated Hours and Fee 20 42 4 28 79 0 0 8 181 $0.00 $30,842.00 3 Task 3 3.1 Bidding Documents and Administration 2 4 8 14 $2,070.00 Task 3 Total Estimated Hours and Fee 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 8 14 $0.00 $2,070.00 4 Construction Services (5 Project Locations)Task 4 4.1 Construction Administration and Meetings 8 12 28 8 56 $9,680.00 4.2 Construction Observation (Part-time)**160 160 $20,160.00 4.3 Construction Staking 6 20 26 $6,472.00 4.4 As-Built Survey & Record Drawings 8 16 24 $5,696.00 `Task 4 Total Estimated Hours and Fee 8 12 0 0 42 160 36 8 266 $0.00 $42,008.00 **This assumes a 6-week construction schedule for sediment excavation of the 5 ponds 5 Project Management and Meetings Task 5 5.1 Kickoff Meeting with the City 1 1 2 $447.00 5.2 60% Plans Review 1 1 2 $447.00 5.3 100% Plans Review 1 1 2 $447.00 5.4 RPBCWD Pre-Application Meeting 1 2 3 $643.00 5.5 MCWD Pre-Application Meeting 1 2 3 $643.00 5.6 On-going Project Management 12 12 $3,012.00 `Task 5 Total Estimated Hours and Fee 17 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 $0.00 $5,639.00 Total Estimated Hours 53 77 10 64 179 200 48 24 655 Average Hourly Billing Rate 251.00 196.00 218.00 112.00 162.00 126.00 275.00 98.00 Total Fee by Labor Classification $13,303.00 $15,092.00 $2,180.00 $7,168.00 $28,998.00 $25,200.00 $13,200.00 $2,352.00 $4,800.00 $112,293.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $112,293.00 CostTotal Hours Sr. Environmental Scientist Alison Harwood 2-Person Survey Crew AdminEnvironmental Scientist Samantha Nielson Estimate of Cost City of Chanhassen 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Project Bidding Services (1 Bid / 5 Project Locations) Construction Documents and Permitting (5 Project Locations) Field Inspector Dan O'Neil Graduate Engineer / CAD Technician Preparation of Pond Feasibility Memorandums Project Manager Project Engineer Kendra FallonBill Alms Sarah Loberg 321 Fee | 20Proposal for 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services 2025 Rate Schedule2025 Rate Schedule WSBENG.COM Billing Rate/Hour PRINCIPAL | ASSOCIATE $195 - $281 SR. PROJECT MANAGER | SR. PROJECT ENGINEER $195 - $251 PROJECT MANAGER $171 - $191 PROJECT ENGINEER | GRADUATE ENGINEER $115 - $190 PROJECT MANAGER ASSISTANT $95 - $155 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN | ENGINEERING SPECIALIST $76 - $189 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT | SR. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT $86 - $182 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST | SR. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST $77 - $180 PLANNER | SR. PLANNER $89 - $188 GIS SPECIALIST | SR. GIS SPECIALIST $86 - $188 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVER $117 - $152 SURVEY Survey Office Technician $136 - $169 Drone Pilot $197 One-Person Crew $197 Two-Person Crew $265 OFFICE TECHNICIAN $67 - $147 Costs associated with word processing, cell phones, reproduction of common correspondence, and mailing are included in the above hourly rates. Vehicle mileage is included in our billing rates [excluding geotechnical and construction materials testing (CMT) service rates]. Mileage can be charged separately, if specifically outlined by contract. | Reimbursable expenses include costs associated with plan, specification, and report reproduction; permit fees; delivery costs; etc. | Multiple rates illustrate the varying levels of experience within each category. | Rate Schedule is adjusted annually. 322 References | 21Proposal for 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance Design and Construction Administration Services BROOKLYN CENTER Lydia Ener Assistant City Engineer 763-339-8625 lener@brooklyncentermn.gov BURNSVILLE Cameron Killmer Engineering Project Manager 952-895-4546 Cameron.Killmer@BurnsvilleMN.gov CHAMPLIN Heather Nelson City Engineer 763-923-7120 hnelson@ci.champlin.mn.us CHANHASSEN Joe Seidl Water Resources Engineer 952-227-1168 jseidl@chanhassenmn.gov CIRCLE PINES Patrick Antonen City Administration 763-231-2605 pantonen@ci.circle-pines.mn.us DUNDAS Duane Meliza Public Works/Building Inspector 507-645-2852 dmeliza@dundas.us LAKEVILLE McKenzie Cafferty Environmental Resources Manager 952-985-4520 mcafferty@lakevillemn.gov MAHTOMEDI Bob Goebel Public Works Director 651-773-9730 bgoebel@ci.mahtomedi.mn.us MAPLE GROVE Derek Asche Water Resources Engineer 763-494-6354 dasche@maplegrovemn.gov PLYMOUTH Ben Scharenbroich Water Resources Supervisor 763-509-5527 bscharenbroich@plymouthmn.gov PRIOR LAKE Nick Monserud Public Works Director/City Engineer 952-447-9834 nmonserud@priorlakemn.gov RICHFIELD Mattias Oddsson Water Resources Engineer 612-861-9797 moddsson@richfieldmn.gov ROSEMOUNT Jane Byron Stormwater Specialist 651-322-2075 Jane.Byron@rosemountmn.gov ROSEVILLE Ryan Johnson Environmental Manager 651-792-7049 ryan.johnson@cityofroseville.com SAVAGE Jesse Carlson Water Resources Manager 952-882-2686 jcarlson@cityofsavage.com ST. LOUIS PARK Erick Francis Water Resources Manager 952-924-2690 EFrancis@stlouisparkmn.gov SOUTH ST. PAUL Kelsey Gelhar City Engineer 651-554-3219 kgelhar@southstpaul.org VICTORIA Brady Lee Public Works Director 612-805-1480 blee@victoriamn.gov In the last two years, WSB’s team has completed bathymetric surveys, feasibility memos and managed pond maintenance projects for the communities and clients listed below. In addition, we have completed 10-year inspection and maintenance prioritization plans for a number of these communities. Previously completed feasibility memos and/or maintenance prioritization plans can be provided if requested. Please reach out to us or the references below for additional information. References 323 2025 Stormwater Pond Maintenance and Red Cedar Point Design & Construction Administration ServicesFirmCompleteness of proposalFirm and Key Personnel ResourcesOverall Score20% 15% 15% 100%(1-10)(1-10)(1-10)(10 pts max)WSB8.57.59.5117,093$ 10.09.3Stantec7.58.09.5119,208$ 9.89.0* WSB Fee adjusted to include expences and match RFP assumption of 5 ponds** Stantec construction hours and fee adjusted down to match RFPFee * ** 50%(1-10)324 September 9, 2025 Bill Alms Water Resources Project Manager WSB 701 Xenia Avenue S Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Re: 2025 Stormwater Pond and Red Cedar Point Drainage Improvement Project Design and Construction Administration Services Request for Proposals Dear Mr. Alms, The City of Chanhassen has approximately 250 publicly maintained stormwater ponds that are used for treatment and storage. We are required to inventory and maintain these ponds per our MS4 permit requirements. Additionally, the Red Cedar Point Area has two specific areas experiencing drainage issues which require attention. As such, the city of Chanhassen is in need of design and construction administration services for our 2025 pond maintenance program and Red Cedar Point area stormwater improvements. Background: Stormwater Ponds The City utilizes a Stormwater Asset Management Program (SWAMP) to inventory, document, and prioritize inspection and maintenance activities, and generate lifecycle estimates for constructed ponds. SWAMP provides a standard rating system to help prioritize maintenance activities. A score is calculated using user provided inputs including construction year, pond area, drainage area, impervious percentage, estimated loading rate, and receiving water body. The score is derived from comparing these variables against Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) pond design standards. In the summer of 2020, City staff conducted comprehensive bathymetric surveys on nearly all 250 of its City owned stormwater ponds. The purpose of these surveys was to ensure that SWAMP had the most recent average depth data as it calculates the SWAMP score for each pond. Beyond just pond depth, the quality and condition of the infrastructure around the pond was evaluated and inputted into our Asset Management Software (Cartegraph), which calculates an Overall Condition Index (OCI) rating of the 325 RFP – City of Chanhassen 2025 Stormwater Pond and Red Cedar Point Improvement Project September 8, 2025 Page 2 pond. City staff then compared the SWAMP score with the OCI score to determine which ponds would be prioritized for maintenance for 2025. Red Cedar Point Area The Red Cedar Point neighborhood, plated in 1912, is an older part of the city with limited stormwater infrastructure, small lots, and narrow rights-of-way. Two specific locations within this area experience persistent drainage issues that the City intends to address through this project: • Area 1 – Red Cedar Point Road: Stormwater from the right-of-way currently discharges directly into Lake Minnewashta without treatment. • Area 2 – Hickory Road: Similar to Area 1, this location conveys a significant volume of untreated surface runoff into Lake Minnewashta. Both areas require grading, improved stormwater conveyance, and water quality treatment strategies to reduce pollutant loading into the lake. Given the limited space and close proximity to the shoreline, filtration-based or raingarden-style practices are preferred. Area 2 presents additional challenges due to site constraints and will likely require an innovative solution that both addresses runoff and ensures long-term accessibility and maintainability by the City. A portion of the site may have to be paved to facilitate access to the stormwater facility and adjacent sanitary sewer system. To evaluate what sort of maintenance activities and/or improvement options would be appropriate for each site, the City requires a Feasibility Memorandum for each pond identified in the RFP and the two projects sites located in the Red Cedar Point area. The Feasibility Memorandum should: • Evaluate and recommend what sort of maintenance and/or improvements would be appropriate for each site, including: o Sediment excavation o Inlet/outlet system configuration or repair o Verification of sizing for Water Quality (WQ), Rate Control and Flood Protection o Erosion repair and/or protection • Investigate background information to provide further detail on maintenance and improvements. • Cost estimating for recommended improvements. • Collect sediment samples in accordance with MPCA guidance to identify material disposal requirements. • Identify permitting requirements necessary for each pond (WCA, Watershed Districts, etc.) o Determine if a wetland delineation is necessary for permitting purposes o Avoid wetland impacts to the greatest extent possible. • Identify construction access needs for each site. Two of the pond sites (LL-P10.7, CL-P1.7) were studied last year. As such the city has pond memos for these sites which can be used and updated for this year’s project. The memos are included in the RFP for reference. 326 RFP – City of Chanhassen 2025 Stormwater Pond and Red Cedar Point Improvement Project September 8, 2025 Page 3 The City would like to perform maintenance on as many project sites annually as budget allows. The estimated budget for 2025 is $525,000, this is full project costs, not just construction costs. Based on SWAMP and OCI scores, City staff has identified the following ponds to be reviewed (see attached map for the locations). The Feasibility Memorandums will be used to develop the overall implementation scope of the program for 2025, and as such, not all ponds noted below may be in the final design/construction project. The consultant shall assume that 5 project sites will require final design and construction administration services. Basin ID OCI/SWAMP Score Area (Ac) LL-P10.7 38.46 0.70 CL-P1.7 48.49 0.52 Lotus Lake 7-1-1 35.35 .08 Lotus Lake 1-26-1 49.53 0.34 Basin 236 82.87 1.34 Lake Susan 5-11-1 22.89 1.02 LS-P3.18 28.05 1.15 Construction is anticipated to start December 2025/January 2026 with restoration work occurring in the spring of 2026. Final project completion is anticipated to be June/July of 2026. To meet the schedule the consultant shall administer the bid opening in mid-November and provide a letter outlining the recommended bid by 12/1/25 to be approved by City Council at the 12/8/25 City Council Meeting. Your firm is invited to submit a proposal to perform the needed Professional Services for the following Tasks. In your proposal, please breakout out each task, per pond (or grouping of ponds if applicable): • Task 1 – Preparation of Pond Feasibility Memorandums • Task 2 – Preliminary Design, Final Design, and Permitting • Task 3 – Bidding • Task 4 – Construction Administration Services shall include: • Preparation of Feasibility memo including site visits, meetings with City staff, review of plats/easements, review of construction access, cost estimating, report preparation including recommended improvements and schedule, and sediment testing. • Perform design services required based on project needs. Services may include but are not limited to preparation of plans and specifications (preliminary and final), detailed survey of the Red Cedar Point Area sites, detailed bathymetric survey of selected ponds to confirm provided data and quantities, coordination with City Public Works and Engineering, including meetings, and preparation and submittal of all permits required from other agencies. 327 RFP – City of Chanhassen 2025 Stormwater Pond and Red Cedar Point Improvement Project September 8, 2025 Page 4 • Bidding services for the project. The City uses online bidding via QuestCDN therefore no in- person bid opening is utilized. • Evaluate all bids received and make a recommendation of award to the City. • Administer pre-construction meeting and weekly construction meetings as necessary. • Review and approve all required submittals. • Prepare and recommend payment for all pay estimates. • Provide construction observation services including construction coordination with City, contractor and impacted residents, final inspection, and certification of completion of the project in accordance with the plans and specifications. Assume 160 hrs of field observation. • Provide final as-built plans including survey of as-built ponds to the City upon completion of the project in PDF and CAD format. All work shall be governed by the City’s Standard Construction Documents, including Standard Specifications and Details. Attendance by the Consultant at public meetings is not needed. Proposal Contents All proposals should contain: • Statement of Understanding – The statement of understanding should restate in the firm’s words the requirements of the project and present a description of services to be provided to successfully complete the project including a project schedule. • Firm Information – Provide a summary of the firm’s experience and qualifications performing this type of work • Key Personnel – Provide a list of the proposed key personnel and their related experience. • Fee – the fee should be broken down by task and should indicate hours, hourly rate, expenses, etc. The design contract will be based on an hourly not-to-exceed amount. Non-relevant marketing materials of the firm need not be included with the proposal. Evaluation Criteria and Selection Procedure Proposals will be evaluated on the following criteria: • Completeness of the proposal including a demonstrated understanding of the requirements of this project, schedule, and the goals of the City. (20%) • Demonstrated experience of the firm and key personnel performing similar projects within the last 5-years. (15%) • Resources of the firm to conduct and complete this project in a satisfactory manner. Specifically, the ability and willingness to commit key personnel and resources. (15%) • Fee. (50%) 328 RFP – City of Chanhassen 2025 Stormwater Pond and Red Cedar Point Improvement Project September 8, 2025 Page 5 The City does not intend to conduct interviews of the proposing firms as part of the evaluation. Proposals should be submitted electronically in PDF format to Joe Seidl, Water Resources Engineer (jseidl@chanhassenmn.gov). The proposal must be received by 4:00 p.m. on September 19th, 2025 for consideration. It is anticipated that the agreement for consultant services will be awarded at the September 22nd 2025 City Council meeting. If you have any questions regarding the proposal, please feel free to contact me at 952-227-1168, jseidl@chanhassenmn.gov. Sincerely, CITY OF CHANHASSEN Joe Seidl, PE (MN) Water Resources Engineer c: Charlie Howley, PE, LEED AP, Public Works Director/City Engineer Ryan Pinkalla, Water Resources Technician Ben Phillips, Engineering Technician 329 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Kerry Zajicek Citizen Action Request File No.Item No: E.1 Agenda Section VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Prepared By Jenny Potter, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Kerry Zajicek Citizen Action Request 330 Complete this form and submit it prior to the City Council meeting date you wish to present your request. The City of Chanhassen invites citizens to submit a request in their native or preferred language. Upon doing so, the city will utilize its resources and do everything in its power to translate the request appropriately. Select City Council Meeting date you would like to attend: 09/22/2025 The Chanhassen City Council meets on the second and fourth Mondays of each month. Printable Meeting Calendar View and/or print this calendar to assist with determining when city council meetings are held in order to make your date selection above. Resident Information * Name Kerry Zajicek * Address 1601 Lyman Blvd Chanhassen MN 55317 * Phone * Email Council Action Requested * Provide a brief description of the action you are requesting from the City Council. I would like the council to consider revising accessory structure size limit (current limit 1000 square feet) on properties that have acreage in all districts (properties larger than 3 or 5 acres). Summary of Information * Provide a narrative of the request including need, costs, timetable, background, etc. bought my property in 2022 - finished with our home build and moved in September 2023. When buying our 5 acre property, we wanted to create a space for a sport court. I have worked with the city for over a year trying to find a place on our property where we could build an outdoor sport court. The only place they would allow it was where there is a current accessory structure (current structure is 950 sq/ft). The current structure is not built in a way to facilitate sports play for my children. I am hoping to tear it down and put up a pole shed for an indoor sport court and storage. In order to make this large enough to have a three point line for a basketball court and to play pickle ball (the two sports our family would use the most) - the shed size would be 1500 sq ft. Talking to builders, this is still a very small sized pole shed. The city has informed me that in my residential district - no accessory buildings can be larger than 1000 sq ft but have not been given a reason. What Happens Next? Immediately upon submission of this form, staff will be notified by email and will provide copies to the City Council prior to the selected meeting date. Contact Questions? Contact City Clerk Jenny Potter at 952-227-1107 or by email. Page | 1 331 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Approve Site Plan for a Memory Care Facility at 1620 Arboretum Blvd (#25- 10) File No.25-10 Item No: H.1 Agenda Section GENERAL BUSINESS Prepared By Rachel Jeske, Planner Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the requested site plan for the 42-bed Eden Springs Assisted Living & Memory Care facility, subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY The Applicant is requesting a site plan approval for a 42-bed memory care project with wetland and parking setback encroachments. BACKGROUND The city has previously received, reviewed, and approved an application for this site, which allowed for the construction of a 48-unit memory care facility. That project was not constructed, and its site plan approvals have since lapsed. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the requested variances necessary for the current Eden Springs project. The requested variances were similar in nature to the variances approved for the prior 48-unit facility. DISCUSSION 332 On September 2, 2025, the Chanhassen Planning Commission approved the requested variances and recommended that the City Council approve the proposed site plan. BUDGET RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends approval of the requested site plan for the construction of the project as proposed subject to updating of plans based on staff review comments. ATTACHMENTS Land Use Application Project Narrative Civil & Landscape Plan Set Architectural Plans Stormwater Report MnDOT Comments Public Comments City Staff Report Findings of Fact Sept 2, 2025 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 333 334 335 Eden Springs – Plan Review Application – Project Narrative 6442 City West Parkway, Suite 300, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Project Summary Eden Springs is a proposed assisted living facility with memory care, located at 1620 Arboretum Boulevard in Chanhassen. At 3.5 acres, this submittal proposes to build two 11,688 square foot custom homes in two phases, each accommodating 21 senior residents, that will be connected by a hallway. These homes will be situated on the property in a way that is inviting to families and a pleasant sight for the community. The property is adjacent to Lake Ann Park and will integrate well into the area with minimal noise or disruption to traffic. Each building represents a Phase of construction, the first starting as soon as possible, and the second following after the first is filled with residents. We believe this project is an excellent opportunity to provide substantial benefits to the City of Chanhassen. By offering an excellent quality of life for seniors, this project can create employment opportunities for locals, and generate reliable tax revenue for the city. Zoning and Code Information Building Code · Assisted Living with Dementia Care, I-2 Condition 1. · Type VA construction. · Sprinklered - Full NFPA 13. · The two buildings will be separated per the MN Building Code requirements with an enclosed hallway, the technical term being a pedestrian walkway. Square Footage of Building 1 and 2: 23,376 square feet Building 1: 11,688 SF Building 2: 11,688 SF Estimated Occupant Load: 150 (75 per building) 100 occupants in institutional sleeping areas 120 gross + 46 occupants in institutional inpatient treatment areas240 gross + 4 occupants in parking garages 200 gross 150 occupants Licensing Code · 2018 NFPA 101 Chapter 18 · An ALFMC license or licenses will be procured from the Minnesota Department of Health. · Two building addresses are required by the state for each building. Zoning Code Number of parking spaces required: 21 parking spaces 336 Eden Springs – Plan Review Application – Project Narrative 6442 City West Parkway, Suite 300, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 1 parking space per every 3 beds in a Continuing Care Facility + the number of employees on the largest shift: 42 beds / 3 = 14 parking spaces + 10 employees = 10 parking spaces 24 parking spaces required. 30 parking spaces provided 2 garage stall parking spaces + 28 surface parking spaces 30 parking spaces provided Projected Number of Employees: 21 These numbers are preliminary estimates, and they will likely change: Morning Shift: 7 Afternoon Shift: 7 Night Shift: 3 Kitchen Staff: 4 Shift change is staggered, with the maximum staff at any one time being 10. List of proposed hazardous materials, use and storage: None Rooftop Equipment: None The mechanical system proposed will be within the interior space of the building, and not visible to view from the road. There likely will be condensing units on grade between the buildings north of the connecting hallway. 337 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION08/13/25CITY SUBMITTAL09/09/25CITY RESUBMITTALPROJECT MANAGERPATRICK SARVERCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 X 702DRAWN BYAM, ZH, WBREVIEWED BYRB,PSPROJECT NUMBER25102EDEN SPRINGS CHANHASSAN, MN LIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LCC 168 PIONEER TRAIL NOX 129, CHASKA, MN 5531858960ANDERS S. MELBYLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.09/09/25Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERC0.0TITLE SHEETEDEN SPRINGSCHANHASSAN, MINNESOTASITE LOCATIONSITE LOCATION MAPNISSUED FOR: CITY RESUBMITTALPROJECT CONTACTSNAME & ADDRESSCONTACTCIVIL ENGINEERCIVIL SITE GROUP5000 GLENWOOD AVEGOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422ANDERS MELBY612-615-0060AMELBY@CIVILSITEGROUP.COMLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTCIVIL SITE GROUP5000 GLENWOOD AVEGOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422PATRICK SARVER612-615-0060PSARVER@CIVILSITEGROUP.COMPROPERTY OWNERARCHITECTFUSION ARHITECTURE ENGINEERING6442 CITY WEST PARKWAYEDEN PRAIRIE, MN, 55344ERIC REINERS952-996-9662EREINERS@FUSION-AE.COMSURVEYORCIVIL SITE GROUP5000 GLENWOOD AVEGOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422RORY SYNSTELIEN612-615-0060 X 712RORY@CIVILSITEGROUP.COMGEOTECHNICALENGINEERHAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES2825 CEDAR AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN, 55407BRETT S. MAKI612-269-4027BMAKI@HAUGOGTS.COMREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRLIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LLC168 PIONEER TRAIL, NO. 129CHASKA, MN, 55318DEENA LAUGEN612-643-1703DEENA@EDENSPRINGSMN.COM1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT"GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITYLOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTORSHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURINGCONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FORTHE SITE MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION.3.ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BYCODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMEDPRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINALCONNECTION OF SERVICES.4.ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK,FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE INPROJECT DOCUMENTS.5.CIVIL SITE GROUP SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER FOR ANYCOSTS ARISING OUT OF THE CLIENTS DECISION TO OBTAIN BIDS ORPROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION BEFORE CIVIL SITE GROUP HAS ISSUEDFINAL, FULLY-APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. THE CLIENTACKNOWLEDGES THAT ALL PRELIMINARY PLANS ARE SUBJECT TOSUBSTANTIAL REVISION UNTIL PLANS ARE FULLY APPROVED AND ALLPERMITS ARE OBTAINED.SHEET INDEXSHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEC0.0TITLE SHEETC1.0REMOVALS PLANC2.0SITE PLANC2.1TURNING MOVEMENT AND WETLANDBUFFER DIAGRAMSC3.0GRADING PLANC4.0UTILITY PLAN - SANITARY & WATERC4.1UTILITY PLAN - STORMC5.0CIVIL DETAILSC5.1CIVIL DETAILSC5.2CIVIL DETAILSC5.3CIVIL DETAILSC5.4CIVIL DETAILSL1.0LANDSCAPE PLANL1.1LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES & DETAILSSW1.0SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONSSW1.1SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSW1.2SWPPP - DETAILSSW1.3SWPPP - NARRATIVESW1.4SWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.5SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS338 Centerline of Creek12" DIP12" DIP12" RCP 12" RCP12" RCP15" RCP24" RCPW 78th St(A Public R/W)AUDUBON ROAD (A Public R/W)Parcel ID: 250100900Address: 1680 W 78th StOwner: Trust for the Benefitof Joy M Gorra C/O Joy MGorra and Doris ButlParcel ID: 250110200Address: 1456 78th StOwner: City of Chanhassen30.0+/-32.0 +/-TRACT ATRACT BPID: 250101105Address: 1620 Arboretum Blvd42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)Centerline of Creek12" DIP12" DIP12" RCP 12" RCP12" RCP15" RCP24" RCPW 78th St(A Public R/W)AUDUBON ROAD (A Public R/W)Parcel ID: 250100900Address: 1680 W 78th StOwner: Trust for the Benefitof Joy M Gorra C/O Joy MGorra and Doris ButlParcel ID: 250110200Address: 1456 78th StOwner: City of Chanhassen30.0+/-32.0 +/-TRACT ATRACT BPID: 250101105Address: 1620 Arboretum Blvd42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSREMOVE EXISTINGTREE AND BALLROOT, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGTREE AND BALLROOT, TYP.EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING PERDETAIL SW1.2/4,TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTER,TYP.EXISTING SIGN TOREMAIN, PROTECTDURINGCONSTRUCTION.RELOCATE SIGN ASNEEDED, CONFIRMWITH SIGN OWNER.PROTECT EX. POWER POLEDURING CONSTRUCTIONRELOCATE / REMOVESIGN, CONFIRM WITHSIGN OWNER.REMOVE EXISTINGPAVEMENT AND BASEMATERIAL FOR UTILITYINSTALLATIONEXISTING BIT. TRAIL TOREMAIN, PROTECTDURING CONSTRUCTIONREMOVE EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTER,TYP.REMOVE EXISTING BIT.TRAIN & BASE MATERIALREMOVE EXISTING BIT.TRAIN & BASE MATERIALREMOVALS PLAN LEGEND:TREE PROTECTIONREMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASEMATERIAL, INCLUDING BIT., CONC., ANDGRAVEL PVMTS.TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDINGROOTS AND STUMPSCOPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION08/13/25CITY SUBMITTAL09/09/25CITY RESUBMITTALPROJECT MANAGERPATRICK SARVERCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 X 702DRAWN BYAM, ZH, WBREVIEWED BYRB,PSPROJECT NUMBER25102EDEN SPRINGS CHANHASSAN, MN LIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LCC 168 PIONEER TRAIL NOX 129, CHASKA, MN 5531858960ANDERS S. MELBYLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.09/09/25Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERC1.0REMOVALS PLANREMOVE CURB AND GUTTER. IF INRIGHT-OF-WAY, COORDINATE WITH LOCALGOVERNING UNIT.REMOVAL NOTES:CITY OF CHANHASSAN REMOVAL NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES.1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONECALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN.3.REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT,STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.4.REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.5.EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THENEAREST JOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS.6.REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND INACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.7.ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AREAPPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS.8.EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUTTHE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT.9.PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDESTAGING, DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THEDRAWINGS.10.MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWNON THE PLAN AND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS. FOR ANY WORK ON ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERPRIOR TO ANY WORK.11.DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BEREPAIRED IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR INACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.12.PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESSOTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.13.SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, ANDTHEFT, DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THECONTRACT. SECURITY MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.14.VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESSDURING NORMAL OPERATING HOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THECONTRACT SHALL CIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BYTHE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.15.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THEMINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THISSHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS ASNEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROADCLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.16.SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTORAND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITIES.17.STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWNON THE DRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.18.ALL EXISTING SITE TRAFFIC/REGULATORY SIGNAGE TO BE INVENTORIED AND IF REMOVED FORCONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RETURNED TO LGU.19.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONECALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5EROSION CONTROL NOTES:CONSTRUCTION LIMITSREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONPROPERTY LINE01" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallROWNER INFORMATIONLIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LLC168 PIONEER TRAIL, NO. 129CHASKA, MN, 55318DEENA LAUGEN612-643-1703DEENA@EDENSPRINGSMN.COMWETLAND DELINEATION LINE339 Centerline of Creek12" DIP12" DIP12" RCP 12" RCP12" RCP15" RCP24" RCPW 78th St(A Public R/W)AUDUBON ROAD (A Public R/W)Parcel ID: 250100900Address: 1680 W 78th StOwner: Trust for the Benefitof Joy M Gorra C/O Joy MGorra and Doris ButlParcel ID: 250110200Address: 1456 78th StOwner: City of Chanhassen30.0+/-32.0 +/-42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)Centerline of Creek12" DIP12" DIP12" RCP 12" RCP12" RCP15" RCP24" RCPW 78th St(A Public R/W)AUDUBON ROAD (A Public R/W)Parcel ID: 250100900Address: 1680 W 78th StOwner: Trust for the Benefitof Joy M Gorra C/O Joy MGorra and Doris ButlParcel ID: 250110200Address: 1456 78th StOwner: City of Chanhassen30.0+/-32.0 +/-42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)25' PKG. STBK. (MIN.)SEE WETLAND BUFFER EXHIBIT ON C2.0 FORREQUIRED AND PROPOSED BUFFER AREASDO NOT ENCROACH ON WETLAND50' BLDG. STBK. (MIN.)NO PARKINGNO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKINGCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSABOVEGROUNDBIO-FILTRATION BASINBOT=951.006" DT. IE=949.00OE=952.50WQL (MPCA)=951.87100-YR HWL=954.52EOF=955.50WETLAND BUFFER = MIN. 20'WATERCOURSE BUFFER = MIN. 30'MINIMUM SETBACK FROM BUFFER = 5'R15.0R15.012126.020.020.0R12.0 R 1 5 . 0 R 1 6 . 0R12.0R15.0R15.0521A34BCD6COUNTER LOBBYFIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTICALSOILEDUTILITY /LAUNDRYSTORAGETOILETMECHDISHROOM /PANTRYJANITORCLEAN LINEN /FLOORMACHINECHARGING109MECHMECHSALON /PODIATRYMED ROOMLIBRARY /CONFERENCE/ SENSORYCLOSETADMINISTRATORTUB ROOM/ TOILETCLEANUTILITY /BREAKROOMMECHVESTIBULEGREATROOMKITCHENREFRIGERATOR3-COMPARTMENTSINKDISHWASHERPANTRY ITEMSFREEZERPANTRY ITEMSPANTRY TALLCABINETCLEAN DISHCARTDIRTY DISHCART SOILED INCLEAN OUTPANTRY CARTPANTRY CARTUNIT 1-CUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-EACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 2-FRUBBISHENCLOSUREUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-D149' - 7 1/2"54' - 2 1/8"5' - 0 5/8"24' - 11 1/4"5' - 0 5/8"60' - 4 7/8"6' - 8"6' - 5 3/4" 27' - 2 1/4" 27' - 1 1/2" 27' - 2 1/4" 2' - 11"6' - 4"PHASE 1PHASE 252' - 10 3/4"12' - 6 3/4"FIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTRICAL26.0R1017.8R1043.8R296.9R50.0R3.0R15.0 R3.0R3.0R12.0R12.0R12.0R12.0R12 . 0 R1 2 . 0 R15.0R41.0R3.0R3.0R3.0R3 . 026.01426.030.0 62.4 98.7 79.9 50. 155.055.010.030.015.026.020.025.0 26.018.0(13) STALLS @ 9'=117.026.0(15) STALLS @ 9'=135.0 18.05.05.05.0 5.04.04.6 10.0HEAVY DUTY BIT.AT TRAIL CROSSINGCONC. DRIVEWAY APRON PERCITY STANDARD DETAIL 5208A,SHEET C5.2MATCH EX. C&GMONUMENT SIGN, FINALLAYOUT AND LOCATION PERSEPARATE SIGN SUBMITTALPROPOSED 100-YR HWLDRAINAGE & FLOWAGEEASEMENTCONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMITPROPOSED DEMOLITION,STAGING AND CLEAN-UPAREAS TO CITY.WETLANDBUFFER,TYP.WETLANDBUFFER,TYP.CONC. DRIVEWAY APRON PERCITY STANDARD DETAIL 5208A,SHEET C5.25X5 CONC.UTILITY PADADA PED. RAMPTRASH ENCLOSURESEE ARCHB612C&G, HVY. DUTY CONC. APRON ATGARAGE DOORS2X2 CONC. UTILITY PAD(S),FINAL NUMBER, LAYOUT, &SIZING PER MECH. PLANSCONC. WALKPVMT., TYP.LIMITED ACCESSGATEEXTERIOR PERGOLA/GAZEBO/TRELLIS SYSTEM,FINAL MAKE, MODEL, COLOR, & LAYOUT PERMANUF. SPECIFICATIONS & SHOP DRAWINGS HVY. DUTY CONC. APRON ATGARAGE DOORS5X5 CONC.UTILITY PADB612 C&GSTRIPEDCROSSWALKADA PARKINGSPACE, INCLUDESIGNAGE &STRIPING, SEEDETAILS, TYP.EXTERIOR PERGOLA/GAZEBO/TRELLIS SYSTEM,FINAL MAKE, MODEL, COLOR, & LAYOUT PERMANUF. SPECIFICATIONS & SHOP DRAWINGSRIBBONCURB,TYP.RIBBON CURBCONC. WALK/PVMT. -SPECIALTY PVMT. , TYP.RETAINING WALLDESIGNED BY OTHERS, TYP.HVY. DUTYPVMT., TYP.TRASHENCLOSURE(SEE ARCH.PLANS)MATCH EX. C&GMATCH EX.BIT. TRAILHEAVY DUTY BIT.AT TRAIL CROSSINGMATCH EX.BIT. TRAILMATCH EX. C&GMATCH EX. C&GMATCH EX.BIT. TRAILMATCH EX.BIT. TRAILLIMITED ACCESSGATEGRADEDSWALE, SEEGRADING FORELEVATIONSGRADED SWALE,SEE GRADING FORELEVATIONSEXTERIOR BENCHES & GARDEN ACCESSORIES,FINAL MAKE, MODEL, COLOR, & LAYOUT PERMANUF. SPECIFICATIONS & SHOP DRAWINGS,TYP.RETAINING WALL85.665.394.4137.7RETAINING WALL9.39.6"ONE-WAY"SIGNAGEMATCH EX. C&GMATCH EX. C&GBITUMINOUS PATCH FORUTILITY INSTALLATION, MATCHEXISTING ROAD SECTION PERCITY STANDARDS(6) "NO PARKING,FIRE LANE" SIGNSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS3 FTTAPERGRADED BERM,SEE GRADING FORELEVATIONSCOPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION08/13/25CITY SUBMITTAL09/09/25CITY RESUBMITTALPROJECT MANAGERPATRICK SARVERCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 X 702DRAWN BYAM, ZH, WBREVIEWED BYRB,PSPROJECT NUMBER25102EDEN SPRINGS CHANHASSAN, MN LIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LCC 168 PIONEER TRAIL NOX 129, CHASKA, MN 5531858960ANDERS S. MELBYLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.09/09/25Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNER SITE LAYOUT NOTES:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENTMARKINGSSIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGSREQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLYPROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANCONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOCITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC SITE NOTES.ACCESSIBILITY ROUTE ARROW (IFAPPLICABLE) DO NOT PAINT.1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHERSTATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURSPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANYUTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIORTO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OFEXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES,BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONSOF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENTOF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NOADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BYTHE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKELAYOUT FOR APPROVAL.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION,INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT.4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICALREPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS.5.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS &ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THEOWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS.6.LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS,BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIORTO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPEARCHITECT.7.CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TOFACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDINGFOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FORREVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOFABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUTNOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS,BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THEOWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLYAPPROVED.9.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDINGAREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS-SEE DETAIL.10.CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ONCENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES.11.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEEDETAIL.12.ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.13.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREASAND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS.14.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS.15.PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESSNOTED OTHERWISE.16.ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP.17.BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAILSHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS.18.ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH ACONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS.19.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO INSTALL ANY SIDEWALK AND CURBING PER DESIGNPLAN. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL CURBS AND SIDEWALKS WILL DRAIN PROPERLY INFIELD CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THE CIVIL ENGINEER 24-HOURSPRIOR TO ANY CURB AND/OR SIDEWALK INSTALLATION TO REVIEW AND INSPECTCURB STAKES. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CURB OR SIDEWALKREPLACEMENT IF THIS PROCEDURE IS NOT FOLLOWED.20.FINISH GRADING FOR HARDSCAPE AREAS IE. PARKING LOTS, CURBS, SIDEWALKSSHALL BE WITHIN 0.05 FEET. ADA AREAS MUST COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS ONPLANS AND ADA REGULATIONS. TOLERANCE WITHIN ADA AREAS IS 0.00 FEET DISCUSSANY DEVIATIONS WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CURB, SIDEWALK AND/OR PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT THATDOES NOT MEET TOLERANCE/ADA REQUIREMENTS.CONCRETE PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) ASSPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK) SEEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATEBASE & CONCRETE DEPTHS, WITHIN ROWSEE CITY DETAIL, WITHIN PRIVATEPROPERTY SEE CSG DETAILOPERATIONAL NOTESSNOW REMOVALALL SNOW SHALL BE STORED ON-SITE OUTSIDEPARKING LOT. WHEN FULL, REMOVAL CO. SHALLREMOVE EXCESS OFF-SITE.TRASH REMOVALTRASH SHALL BE PLACED IN EXTERIOR TRASHAREA AND REMOVED BY COMMERCIAL CO.WEEKLY.DELIVERIESDELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR AT THE FRONT DOORVIA STANDARD COMMERCIAL DELIVERYVEHICLES (UPS, FED-EX, USPS).REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.0SITE PLAN01" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallROWNER INFORMATIONLIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LLC168 PIONEER TRAIL, NO. 129CHASKA, MN, 55318DEENA LAUGEN612-643-1703DEENA@EDENSPRINGSMN.COMBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE). SEEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATEBASE & WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL.SITE PLAN LEGEND:340 W 78th St(A Public R/W)W 78th St(A Public R/W)NO PARKINGNO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKING521A34BCD6COUNTER LOBBYFIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTICALSOILEDUTILITY /LAUNDRYSTORAGETOILETMECHDISHROOM /PANTRYJANITORCLEAN LINEN /FLOORMACHINECHARGING109MECHMECHSALON /PODIATRYMED ROOMLIBRARY /CONFERENCE/ SENSORYCLOSETADMINISTRATORTUB ROOM/ TOILETCLEANUTILITY /BREAKROOMMECHVESTIBULEGREATROOMKITCHENREFRIGERATOR3-COMPARTMENTSINKDISHWASHERPANTRY ITEMSFREEZERPANTRY ITEMSPANTRY TALLCABINETCLEAN DISHCARTDIRTY DISHCART SOILED INCLEAN OUTPANTRY CARTPANTRY CARTUNIT 1-CUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-EACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 2-FRUBBISHENCLOSUREUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-D149' - 7 1/2"54' - 2 1/8"5' - 0 5/8"24' - 11 1/4"5' - 0 5/8"60' - 4 7/8"6' - 8"6' - 5 3/4"27' - 2 1/4"27' - 1 1/2"27' - 2 1/4"2' - 11"6' - 4"PHASE 1PHASE 252' - 10 3/4"12' - 6 3/4"FIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTRICALW 78th St(A Public R/W)W 78th St(A Public R/W)NO PARKING NO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKING521A34BCD6COUNTER LOBBYFIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTICALSOILEDUTILITY /LAUNDRYSTORAGETOILETMECHDISHROOM /PANTRYJANITORCLEAN L INEN /FLOORMACHINECHARGING109 MECHMECHSALON /PODIATRYMED ROOMLIBRARY /CONFERENCE/ SENSORYCLOSETADMINISTRATORTUB ROOM/ TOILETCLEANUTILITY /BREAKROOMMECHVESTIBULEGREATROOMKITCHENREFRIGERATOR3-COMPARTMENTSINKDISHWASHER PANTRY ITEMSFREEZERPANTRY ITEMSPANTRY TALLCABINETCLEAN DISHCARTDIRTY DISH CART SOILED INCLEAN OUT PANTRY CARTPANTRY CARTUNIT 1-CUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-EACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 2-FRUBBISHENCLOSUREUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-D149' - 7 1/2"54' - 2 1/8"5' - 0 5/8"24' - 11 1/4"5' - 0 5/8"60' - 4 7/8"6' - 8"6' - 5 3/4" 27' - 2 1/4" 27' - 1 1/2" 27' - 2 1/4" 2' - 11"6' - 4"PHASE 1PHASE 252' - 10 3/4"12' - 6 3/4"FIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTRICALW 78th St(A Public R/W)W 78th St(A Public R/W)NO PARKINGNO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKING521A34BCD6COUNTER LOBBYFIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTICALSOILEDUTILITY /LAUNDRYSTORAGETOILETMECHDISHROOM /PANTRYJANITORCLEAN LINEN /FLOORMACHINECHARGING109MECHMECHSALON /PODIATRYMED ROOMLIBRARY /CONFERENCE/ SENSORYCLOSETADMINISTRATORTUB ROOM/ TOILETCLEANUTILITY /BREAKROOMMECHVESTIBULEGREATROOMKITCHENREFRIGERATOR3-COMPARTMENTSINKDISHWASHERPANTRY ITEMSFREEZERPANTRY ITEMSPANTRY TALLCABINETCLEAN DISHCARTDIRTY DISHCART SOILED INCLEAN OUTPANTRY CARTPANTRY CARTUNIT 1-CUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-EACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 2-FRUBBISHENCLOSUREUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-D149' - 7 1/2"54' - 2 1/8"5' - 0 5/8"24' - 11 1/4"5' - 0 5/8"60' - 4 7/8"6' - 8"6' - 5 3/4"27' - 2 1/4"27' - 1 1/2"27' - 2 1/4"2' - 11"6' - 4"PHASE 1PHASE 252' - 10 3/4"12' - 6 3/4"FIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTRICAL12" RCP W 78th St42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)12" RCP W 78th St42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)WETLANDNO PARKING NO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKING521A34BCD6COUNTER LOBBYFIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTICALSOILEDUTILITY /LAUNDRYSTORAGETOILETMECHDISHROOM /PANTRYJANITORCLEAN L INEN /FLOORMACHINECHARGING 109 MECHMECHSALON /PODIATRYMED ROOMLIBRARY /CONFERENCE/ SENSORYCLOSETADMINISTRATORTUB ROOM/ TOILETCLEANUTILITY /BREAKROOMMECHVESTIBULEGREATROOMKITCHENREFRIGERATOR3-COMPARTMENTSINKDISHWASHER PANTRY ITEMSFREEZERPANTRY ITEMS PANTRY TALLCABINETCLEAN DISHCARTDIRTY DISH CART SOILED IN CLEAN OUT PANTRY CARTPANTRY CARTUNIT 1-CUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-EACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 2-FRUBBISHENCLOSUREUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-D149' - 7 1/2"54' - 2 1/8"5' - 0 5/8"24' - 11 1/4"5' - 0 5/8"60' - 4 7/8"6' - 8"6' - 5 3/4" 27' - 2 1/4" 27' - 1 1/2" 27' - 2 1/4" 2' - 11"6' - 4"PHASE 1PHASE 252' - 10 3/4"12' - 6 3/4"FIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTRICAL12" RCP W 78th St42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)12" RCP W 78th St42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)WETLANDNO PARKING NO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKING521A34BCD6COUNTER LOBBYFIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTICALSOILEDUTILITY /LAUNDRYSTORAGETOILETMECHDISHROOM /PANTRYJANITORCLEAN L INEN /FLOORMACHINECHARGING 109 MECHMECHSALON /PODIATRYMED ROOMLIBRARY /CONFERENCE/ SENSORYCLOSETADMINISTRATORTUB ROOM/ TOILETCLEANUTILITY /BREAKROOMMECHVESTIBULEGREATROOMKITCHENREFRIGERATOR3-COMPARTMENTSINKDISHWASHER PANTRY ITEMSFREEZERPANTRY ITEMS PANTRY TALLCABINETCLEAN DISHCARTDIRTY DISH CART SOILED IN CLEAN OUT PANTRY CARTPANTRY CARTUNIT 1-CUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-EACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 2-FRUBBISHENCLOSUREUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-D149' - 7 1/2"54' - 2 1/8"5' - 0 5/8"24' - 11 1/4"5' - 0 5/8"60' - 4 7/8"6' - 8"6' - 5 3/4" 27' - 2 1/4" 27' - 1 1/2" 27' - 2 1/4" 2' - 11"6' - 4"PHASE 1PHASE 252' - 10 3/4"12' - 6 3/4"FIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTRICALCOPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION08/13/25CITY SUBMITTAL09/09/25CITY RESUBMITTALPROJECT MANAGERPATRICK SARVERCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 X 702DRAWN BYAM, ZH, WBREVIEWED BYRB,PSPROJECT NUMBER25102EDEN SPRINGS CHANHASSAN, MN LIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LCC 168 PIONEER TRAIL NOX 129, CHASKA, MN 5531858960ANDERS S. MELBYLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.09/09/25Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.1TURNING MOVEMENTAND WETLANDBUFFER DIAGRAMSSEE SHEET C2.0 FORGENERAL SITE NOTES& LEGENDKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR01" = 50'-0"50'-0"25'-0"N1GARBAGE TRUCK DIAGRAM01" = 50'-0"50'-0"25'-0"N2FIRE TRUCK DIAGRAM01" = 50'-0"50'-0"25'-0"N3WB-40 DIAGRAMWETLAND BUFFER EXHIBIT (NO SCALE)EXISTING WETLAND BUFFER EXHIBITPROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER EXHIBIT341 Centerline of Creek12" DIP12" DIP12" RCP 12" RCP12" RCP15" RCP24" RCPW 78th St(A Public R/W)AUDUBON ROAD (A Public R/W)Parcel ID: 250100900Address: 1680 W 78th StOwner: Trust for the Benefitof Joy M Gorra C/O Joy MGorra and Doris ButlParcel ID: 250110200Address: 1456 78th StOwner: City of Chanhassen42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)Centerline of Creek12" DIP12" DIP12" RCP 12" RCP12" RCP15" RCP24" RCPW 78th St(A Public R/W)AUDUBON ROAD (A Public R/W)Parcel ID: 250100900Address: 1680 W 78th StOwner: Trust for the Benefitof Joy M Gorra C/O Joy MGorra and Doris ButlParcel ID: 250110200Address: 1456 78th StOwner: City of Chanhassen42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)SEE WETLAND BUFFER EXHIBIT ON C2.0 FORREQUIRED AND PROPOSED BUFFER AREASDO NOT ENCROACH ON WETLANDNO PARKINGNO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKINGCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSABOVEGROUNDBIO-FILTRATION BASINBOT=951.006" DT. IE=949.00OE=952.50WQL (MPCA)=951.87100-YR HWL=954.52EOF=955.50521A34BCD6COUNTER LOBBYFIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTICALSOILEDUTILITY /LAUNDRYSTORAGETOILETMECHDISHROOM /PANTRYJANITORCLEAN LINEN /FLOORMACHINECHARGING109MECHMECHSALON /PODIATRYMED ROOMLIBRARY /CONFERENCE/ SENSORYCLOSETADMINISTRATORTUB ROOM/ TOILETCLEANUTILITY /BREAKROOMMECHVESTIBULEGREATROOMKITCHENREFRIGERATOR3-COMPARTMENTSINKDISHWASHERPANTRY ITEMSFREEZERPANTRY ITEMSPANTRY TALLCABINETCLEAN DISHCARTDIRTY DISHCART SOILED INCLEAN OUTPANTRY CARTPANTRY CARTUNIT 1-CUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-EACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 2-FRUBBISHENCLOSUREUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-D149' - 7 1/2"54' - 2 1/8"5' - 0 5/8"24' - 11 1/4"5' - 0 5/8"60' - 4 7/8"6' - 8"6' - 5 3/4" 27' - 2 1/4" 27' - 1 1/2" 27' - 2 1/4" 2' - 11"6' - 4"PHASE 1PHASE 252' - 10 3/4"12' - 6 3/4"FIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTRICALCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSSB-8 (968)SB-1 (970)SB-2 (970)SB-3 (973)SB-4 (965)SB-5 (971)SB-6 (959)SB-7 (958)COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION08/13/25CITY SUBMITTAL09/09/25CITY RESUBMITTALPROJECT MANAGERPATRICK SARVERCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 X 702DRAWN BYAM, ZH, WBREVIEWED BYRB,PSPROJECT NUMBER25102EDEN SPRINGS CHANHASSAN, MN LIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LCC 168 PIONEER TRAIL NOX 129, CHASKA, MN 5531858960ANDERS S. MELBYLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.09/09/25Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERC3.0GRADING PLAN1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALGRADING PLAN LEGEND:SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTERSPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURBSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OFSTAIRS/TOP OF STAIRSCITY OF CHANHASSEN GRADING NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES.EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOWLINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)CURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT)EMERGENCY OVERFLOW41.261125891.00 G891.00 TC891.00 BS/TS1137EOF=1135.52TOSPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTING891.00 MEGBGRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTSSEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5EROSION CONTROL NOTES:CONSTRUCTION LIMITSREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION01" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR342 Centerline of Creek12" DIP12" DIP12" RCP 12" RCP12" RCP15" RCP24" RCPW 78th St(A Public R/W)AUDUBON ROAD (A Public R/W)Parcel ID: 250100900Address: 1680 W 78th StOwner: Trust for the Benefitof Joy M Gorra C/O Joy MGorra and Doris ButlParcel ID: 250110200Address: 1456 78th StOwner: City of Chanhassen42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)Centerline of Creek12" DIP12" DIP12" RCP 12" RCP12" RCP15" RCP24" RCPW 78th St(A Public R/W)AUDUBON ROAD (A Public R/W)Parcel ID: 250100900Address: 1680 W 78th StOwner: Trust for the Benefitof Joy M Gorra C/O Joy MGorra and Doris ButlParcel ID: 250110200Address: 1456 78th StOwner: City of Chanhassen42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)WETLANDSEE WETLAND BUFFER EXHIBIT ON C2.0 FORREQUIRED AND PROPOSED BUFFER AREASDO NOT ENCROACH ON WETLANDNO PARKINGNO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKINGCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSABOVEGROUNDBIO-FILTRATION BASINBOT=951.006" DT. IE=949.00OE=952.50WQL (MPCA)=951.87100-YR HWL=954.52EOF=955.50521A34BCD6COUNTER LOBBYFIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTICALSOILEDUTILITY /LAUNDRYSTORAGETOILETMECHDISHROOM /PANTRYJANITORCLEAN LINEN /FLOORMACHINECHARGING109MECHMECHSALON /PODIATRYMED ROOMLIBRARY /CONFERENCE/ SENSORYCLOSETADMINISTRATORTUB ROOM/ TOILETCLEANUTILITY /BREAKROOMMECHVESTIBULEGREATROOMKITCHENREFRIGERATOR3-COMPARTMENTSINKDISHWASHERPANTRY ITEMSFREEZERPANTRY ITEMSPANTRY TALLCABINETCLEAN DISHCARTDIRTY DISHCART SOILED INCLEAN OUTPANTRY CARTPANTRY CARTUNIT 1-CUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-EACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 2-FRUBBISHENCLOSUREUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-D149' - 7 1/2"54' - 2 1/8"5' - 0 5/8"24' - 11 1/4"5' - 0 5/8"60' - 4 7/8"6' - 8"6' - 5 3/4" 27' - 2 1/4" 27' - 1 1/2" 27' - 2 1/4" 2' - 11"6' - 4"PHASE 1PHASE 252' - 10 3/4"12' - 6 3/4"FIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTRICALCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSSTUB SANITARY SEWERTO 5' FROM BUILDINGIE @ STUB=957.39COORD. W/MECH'LSANMH 12RE=96X.XXIE(N)=956.29IE(W)=956.1955 LF 6" PVC SCH 40SANITARY SERVICE @ 2.00%MAKE WET TAPCONNECTION TOEXISTING 12" WATERMAIN, COORD. WITH CITYFIRE DEPARTMENTCONNECTION,COORD. W/MECH'L6" COMBINED DIP WATER SERVICEAND VALVE, STUB TO WITHIN 5'FROM BUILDING, COORD. W/MECH'LGATE VALVE ANDVALVE BOX6" C900 PVCWATERMAIN6" C900 PVCWATERMAIN6" COMBINED DIP WATERSERVICE AND VALVE, STUB TOWITHIN 5' FROM BUILDING,COORD. W/MECH'L22.5° BENDFIRE DEPARTMENTCONNECTION,COORD. W/MECH'L45° BENDS6" CORE DRILL CONNECTION W/ INTRAFLOW INSIDE DROP TO EX.SANITARY INTERCEPTOR MANHOLEEX. RIM=970.08PROP. 6" CORE DRILL=949.87PROP. IE INSIDE DROP BELOW ELBOW=928.20 (0.1' ABOVE EX IE.)POINT ELBOW DOWNSTREAM.SECURE INSIDE DROP WITHIN MANHOLE, ENSURE WATER-TIGHTPENETRATION OF MANHOLE.SANMH 11RE=96X.XXIE(E)=954.87IE(SW)=954.77245 LF 6" PVC SCH 40SANITARY SERVICE @ 2.00%66 LF 6" PVC SCH 40SANITARY SERVICE @ 2.00%HYDRANT, PERCITY STANDARDSHYDRANT, PERCITY STANDARDSHYDRANT, PERCITY STANDARDSGATE VALVEGATE VALVE6"x6" TEE6"x6" TEE6"x6" TEEGATE VALVE45° BENDS45° BENDSCOPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION08/13/25CITY SUBMITTAL09/09/25CITY RESUBMITTALPROJECT MANAGERPATRICK SARVERCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 X 702DRAWN BYAM, ZH, WBREVIEWED BYRB,PSPROJECT NUMBER25102EDEN SPRINGS CHANHASSAN, MN LIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LCC 168 PIONEER TRAIL NOX 129, CHASKA, MN 5531858960ANDERS S. MELBYLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.09/09/25Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNER GENERAL UTILITY NOTES:UTILITY PLAN LEGEND:CITY OF CHANHASSEN UTILITY NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC UTILITY NOTES.CATCH BASINGATE VALVE AND VALVE BOXSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTMANHOLEFES AND RIP RAPCONSTRUCTION LIMITSDRAINTILETRENCH DRAINREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC4.0UTILITY PLAN -SANITARY &WATER01" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHERSTATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURSPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANYUTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIESAND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLIMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THEPLANS.4.CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED ORPLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER.5.PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OFFLARED END SECTION.6.UTILITIES CONNECTIONS ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDINGFOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINALCONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL ANDMECHANICAL PLANS.7.CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALLCATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIMELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS.8.ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.9.HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITYREQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL.10.A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18"VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTHWATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL.11.A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTALSEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.12.ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITYSTANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.13.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED.14.COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THEMECHANICAL DRAWINGS.15.COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIESWITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF.16.ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTSOF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFICCONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHEDPER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFICCONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BELIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALLPUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURESSHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.17.ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADESWHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH.STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTSFOR TRAFFIC LOADING.18.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES.19.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TOUTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY ASTO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES.20.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION ANDSUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK.21.FOR ALL SITES LOCATED IN CLAY SOIL AREAS, DRAIN TILE MUST BE INSTALLED AT ALLLOW POINT CATCH BASINS 25' IN EACH DIRECTION. SEE PLAN AND DETAIL. INSTALLLOW POINT DRAIN TILE PER PLANS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONSAND REQUIREMENTS.22.AN OSHA-APPROVED QUALIFIED PERSON SHOULD REVIEW THE SOIL CLASSIFICATIONPRESENTED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT IN THE FIELD. EXCAVATIONS MUSTCOMPLY WITH CURRENT OSHA REQUIREMENTS IN THE CODE OF FEDERALREGULATIONS PERTAINING TO EXCAVATIONS AND TRENCHES. EXCAVATION SAFETY ISTHE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 343 Centerline of Creek12" DIP12" DIP12" RCP 12" RCP12" RCP15" RCP24" RCPW 78th St(A Public R/W)Parcel ID: 250110200Address: 1456 78th StOwner: City of ChanhassenCenterline of Creek12" DIP12" DIP12" RCP 12" RCP12" RCP15" RCP24" RCPW 78th St(A Public R/W)Parcel ID: 250110200Address: 1456 78th StOwner: City of ChanhassenWETLANDNO PARKINGNO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKINGCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSABOVEGROUND BIO-FILTRATION BASINBOT=951.006" DT. IE=949.00OE=952.50WQL (MPCA)=951.87100-YR HWL=954.52EOF=955.50521A34BCD6COUNTER LOBBYFIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTICALSOILEDUTILITY /LAUNDRYSTORAGETOILETMECHDISHROOM /PANTRYJANITORCLEAN LINEN /FLOORMACHINECHARGING109MECHMECHSALON /PODIATRYMED ROOMLIBRARY /CONFERENCE/ SENSORYCLOSETADMINISTRATORTUB ROOM/ TOILETCLEANUTILITY /BREAKROOMMECHVESTIBULEGREATROOMKITCHENREFRIGERATOR3-COMPARTMENTSINKDISHWASHERPANTRY ITEMSFREEZERPANTRY ITEMSPANTRY TALLCABINETCLEAN DISHCARTDIRTY DISHCART SOILED INCLEAN OUTPANTRY CARTPANTRY CARTUNIT 1-CUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-EACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 2-FRUBBISHENCLOSUREUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-D149' - 7 1/2"54' - 2 1/8"5' - 0 5/8"24' - 11 1/4"5' - 0 5/8"60' - 4 7/8"6' - 8"6' - 5 3/4" 27' - 2 1/4" 27' - 1 1/2" 27' - 2 1/4" 2' - 11"6' - 4"PHASE 1PHASE 252' - 10 3/4"12' - 6 3/4"FIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTRICALCBMH 26RIM=964.82IE=961.32AREADRAIN 25RIM=966.05IE=960.84CBMH 23RIM=965.41IE=960.01CBMH 11RIM=964.44IE=960.00SUMP=956.00INCLUDE SAFLBAFFLE & HOODAREA DRAIN 2RIM=966.28IE=961.20335 LF 6" PVC PERF. DRAIN TILEW/FILTER SOCK @ 0.00%IE=949.00, SEE DETAILAREA DRAIN 4RIM=966.28IE=963.3038 LF 10" HDPESTORM @ 1.0095 LF 12" HDPESTORM @ 0.50%114 LF 12" HDPESTORM @ 0.50%167 LF 15" HDPESTORM @ 0.50%63 LF 15" HDPESTORM @ 4.00%DT C/ODT IE=949.00,TYP.AREA DRAIN 3RIM=964.80IE=962.3075 LF 8" HDPESTORM @ 1.07%CONTECH JELLYFISH FILTER4X6 PEAK DIVERSIONRIM=96X.XXIE IN (N)=958.23IE OUT (SE)=957.73WATER QUALITY RATE=0.27 CFS37 LF 24" HDPESTORM @ 2.00%83 LF 10" HDPESTORM @ 1.07%AREA DRAIN 23BRIM=965.25IE=960.7062 LF 10" HDPESTORM @ 1.00%CLEANOUTRIM=96X.XXIE=962.92CLEANOUTRIM=966.85IE=961.49CLEANOUTRIM=9XX.XXIE=960.32CBMH 1RIM=965.23IE=959.26INCLUDE CONTECHSCICLONE SCX-0427 LF 8" HDPESTORM @ 1.07%53 LF 10" HDPESTORM @ 2.00%7 LF 10" HDPESTORM @ 5.00%AREA DRAIN 23ARIM=965.25IE=960.3617 LF 10" HDPESTORM @ 2.00%50 LF 12" HDPESTORM @ 0.50%FES 3IE=956.00W/ RIPRAP & TRASHGUARD24" OUTLET=958.40OUTLET CONTROLSTRUCTURERIM=955.20IE(S)=952.50IE(N)=947.50IE DT=949.00FES 1IE=945.00W/ RIPRAP &TRASH GUARDCBMH 24RIM=966.42IE=960.59NEENAH R-3205CASTING12" INLET=959.0016 LF 12" HDPESTORM @ 6.25%WATER REUSE IRRIGATIONPUMP CONTROL CABINETMUNICIPAL BACKUP WATER LINE TOIRRIGATION PUMP CONTROL CABINETWATER REUSE PIPE FROM WETWELL TO PUMP CONTROL CABINETINSTALL 4' DEEP WET WELLBELOW THE BOTTOM OF THETANK FOR WATER REUSE PUMPUNDERGROUND STORMWATER REUSE SYSTEM60" DUAL WALL SOLID CMP PIPE37' x 82' FOOTPRINTINCLUDE 12" SIDE & END STONEINCLUDE 6" STONE BASE & COVERTOP STONE=930.80TOP 60" CMP=960.30IE 60" CMP=955.30IE STONE=954.801.1" WQ ELEV=858.51100-YR HWL=960.04SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE 24" OUTLET, WATER LEVELINDICATOR, AND ALL NECESSARY APPURTENANCES.SYSTEM DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE 1.5 ACRESOF LANDSCAPED AREA @ APPROX. 1.1" OFIRRIGATION PER WEEK.12" INLET=958.7517 LF 12" HDPESTORM @ 3.00%31 LF 24" HDPESTORM @ 2.00%CBMH 22RIM=965.50IE=959.17SUMP=955.17INCLUDE CONTECHSCICLONE SCX-0415" INLET=958.6932 LF 15" HDPESTORM @ 1.50%6" OUTLET=958.356 LF 6" HDPESTORM @ 2.00%MH 12RIM=96X.XXIE(N)=957.78IE(NW)=957.25IE(NE)=956.7424 LF 6" HDPESTORM @ 2.00%FES XIE=951.8014 LF 12" HDPESTORM @ 5.00%*SLOPES DOWNFROM OCS TO FES*COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION08/13/25CITY SUBMITTAL09/09/25CITY RESUBMITTALPROJECT MANAGERPATRICK SARVERCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 X 702DRAWN BYAM, ZH, WBREVIEWED BYRB,PSPROJECT NUMBER25102EDEN SPRINGS CHANHASSAN, MN LIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LCC 168 PIONEER TRAIL NOX 129, CHASKA, MN 5531858960ANDERS S. MELBYLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.09/09/25Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERUTILITY PLAN LEGEND:CITY OF CHANHASSEN UTILITY NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC UTILITY NOTES.CATCH BASINGATE VALVE AND VALVE BOXSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTMANHOLEFES AND RIP RAPCONSTRUCTION LIMITSDRAINTILETRENCH DRAINREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC4.0UTILITY PLAN -STORM01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRSEE SHEET C4.0 FOR GENERALUTILITY NOTES344 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION08/13/25CITY SUBMITTAL09/09/25CITY RESUBMITTALPROJECT MANAGERPATRICK SARVERCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 X 702DRAWN BYAM, ZH, WBREVIEWED BYRB,PSPROJECT NUMBER25102EDEN SPRINGS CHANHASSAN, MN LIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LCC 168 PIONEER TRAIL NOX 129, CHASKA, MN 5531858960ANDERS S. MELBYLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.09/09/25Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERC5.0CIVIL DETAILSREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION345 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION08/13/25CITY SUBMITTAL09/09/25CITY RESUBMITTALPROJECT MANAGERPATRICK SARVERCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 X 702DRAWN BYAM, ZH, WBREVIEWED BYRB,PSPROJECT NUMBER25102EDEN SPRINGS CHANHASSAN, MN LIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LCC 168 PIONEER TRAIL NOX 129, CHASKA, MN 5531858960ANDERS S. MELBYLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.09/09/25Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERC5.1CIVIL DETAILSREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION346 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION08/13/25CITY SUBMITTAL09/09/25CITY RESUBMITTALPROJECT MANAGERPATRICK SARVERCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 X 702DRAWN BYAM, ZH, WBREVIEWED BYRB,PSPROJECT NUMBER25102EDEN SPRINGS CHANHASSAN, MN LIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LCC 168 PIONEER TRAIL NOX 129, CHASKA, MN 5531858960ANDERS S. MELBYLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.09/09/25Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERC5.2CIVIL DETAILSREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION347 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION08/13/25CITY SUBMITTAL09/09/25CITY RESUBMITTALPROJECT MANAGERPATRICK SARVERCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 X 702DRAWN BYAM, ZH, WBREVIEWED BYRB,PSPROJECT NUMBER25102EDEN SPRINGS CHANHASSAN, MN LIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LCC 168 PIONEER TRAIL NOX 129, CHASKA, MN 5531858960ANDERS S. MELBYLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.09/09/25Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERC5.3CIVIL DETAILSREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONEXPANSION JOINT SEALANT DETAILSN T SNOTES:1.SEPARATING TAPE OR BACKERMATERIAL REQUIRED TO PREVENT JOINTSEALANT FROM FLOWING INTO SAWCUT,TO SEPARATE NONCOMPATIBLEMATERIALS AND TO PREVENT SEALANTFROM BONDING TO BOTTOM OFRESERVOIR.2.TOP OF SEALANT WILL BE 1/8" TO 1/4"BELOW TOP OF PAVEMENT.W= WIDTH OF SEALANT RESERVOIR1/2" MINIMUN5/8" MAXIMUMEXCEPT FOR 3/4" EXPANSIONJOINTSD= DEPTH OF SEALANT1.0 TO 1.5 TIMES WT= DEPTH OF INTIAL SAWCUT, 1/4 OFTHE SLAB THINKNESS FORPAVEMENT LESS THAN 12"POURED JOINTSEALANTSEPARATING TAPE SEENOTE 1SEE NOTE 2POURED JOINTSEALANTSEE NOTE 2BACKER MATERIAL SEENOTE 1WD TTWDPOURED JOINTSEALANTSEE NOTE 2BACKER MATERIALSEE NOTE 1T WDCOMPACTED CLASS 5AGGREGATE BASE. SEESOIL REPORT FORDEPTH, 6" MIN.EXTERIOR BUILDING WALLCONCRETEPAVEMENTCONCRETEPAVEMENTCONCRETEPAVEMENTCONCRETEPAVEMENTCONCRETEPAVEMENT46" 3'-6" 3'-6" 60"-66" FROM PAVEMENT TO BOTTOM OF SIGNACCESSIBLE SIGN & CHANNEL POST - LOT LOCATIONN T S1'-6"NOTE:1. SIGN SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED.2. BOTTOM OF SIGNS TO BE MOUNTED 60"-66" FROM PARKING GRADE, SEE SIGN POSTINSTALLATION DETAIL3. VERIFY POST PAINT C0LOR WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.14" METAL PLATE WELDED TO BOTTOM OF 6” PIPEGROUT INSIDE OF INNER PIPE ANNULAR SPACE TO 1"FROM TOPADJACENT PVMT. - MATERIALVARIES, SEE PLAN & DETAILSSLOPE TOPOF FOOTINGAWAY FROMBASE, TYP.1" SILICONE RUBBER ORASPHALTIC CAULKINGCOMPOUND6" OUTSIDE DIA. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE PAINT 1COAT ANTI-RUST PRIMER PRIMER3-3/16", 2 LBS./FT., COMMERCIAL GRADE,GALVANIZED STEEL "CHANNEL" STYLE SIGN POSTMETAL SIGN(S) ACCORDING TO MN STATECODE, PROVIDE SHOP DRAWING OF SIGNMODELGALVANIZED STEEL FASTENER (TYP. OF 2), INCLUDEREINFORCING PLATE AT EACH BOLT LOCATION (3"X3")TRIM POST TOBELOW TOP OFSIGN6"14" THICK, COMMERCIAL GRADE THERMOPLASTICPOLYETHYLENE PROTECTIVE SLEEVE, PER IDEALSHIELD OR SIMILAR. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.PROVIDE COLOR SELECTION OPTIONSCUT TOP OF POLYETHYLENE SLEEVE TOACCOMMODATE CHANNEL POST (ON-SITE)COMMERCIAL GRADE CONSPICUITY MARKINGS(TAPE), 3M DIAMOND GRADE SERIES 973, ORSIMILARCOMPACTED AGG., TYP.6" INSIDE DIA. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE PAINT WITHANTI-RUST PRIMERCONC. FOOTING, SONOTUBE® FORM RECOMMENDEDNO PARKING TO BEUSED IN FRONT OFSTRIPED ACCESSAISLE9ACCESSIBLE PARKING PAVEMENT MARKINGN T SNOPARKINGNOTE:1.ADHERE TO ALL STATE & FEDERAL ADASTANDARDS FOR PARKING, PAINT &SIGNAGE.2.VERIFY AND LAYOUT ALL PAINTED FORMS &STRIPING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION3.SEE PLAN FOR ACTUAL PARKING SPACESLAYOUT4.ALL PAINT COLORS MUST CONFORM TOSTATE AND FEDERAL ADA STANDARDSNOPARKINGNOPARKING4" WIDE PAINTED STRIPING, 45°CROSS STRIPE PATTERN AT 2'O.C. AT ACCESS AISLEFACE OF CURBADJ. SIDEWALKACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP.SEE GRADING & DETAILSHANDICAP SIGN, CENTERED AT HEADOF PARKING SPACE AND ACCESSAISLE 2' MIN,. AND 8' MAX. FROM FACEOF CURBHANDICAP PARKING ACCESSAISLE WITH PAINTED 12" HIGHLETTERING OF "NO PARKING"CENTERED TOWARD DRIVEAISLENO PARKING SIGNCENTERED AT HEAD OFSPACE ON CENTER STRIPEHANDICAP PARKING SPACEWITH PAINTEDINTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OFACCESSIBILITY WITHCONTRASTING SQUAREBACKGROUND, CENTEREDTOWARD DRIVE AISLENOTE: FOR REFERENCE ONLY, USESTANDARD ADA PVMT. PAINTTEMPLATE6" RADIUS12" DIAMETER6" LINE WIDTH FOR FIGURE6" LINE WIDTH OUTSIDE BORDER5'-6" SQUARE OVERALL18" RADIUS "WHEEL" SHAPEPAINTED SYMBOL DIAGRAM8'MIN.8'MIN.8'MIN.PER CITY CODE 10HEIGHT VARIES, SEE GRADING PLANRETAINING WALL - SEGMENTAL BLOCKN T SFENCE OR RAILING - INSTALL PER PERMANUF. SPECS. SHOP DRAWINGSREQUIREDTOPSOIL &PLANTINGS, SEEPLAN FORSPECIFIC FINISHEDCONDITIONMODULAR BLOCKRETAINING WALL UNITSAS SPECIFIED (TYP.)GEOGRID REINFORCEMENTAS SPECIFIED-VERIFY LENGTH WITHENGINEER12" WIDE DRAINAGE LAYER95% COMPACTED BACKFILLSOIL IN 6" LIFTS4" DIA. PERF. DRAINTILE W/ SOCK6" MIN. COMPACTEDLEVELING PADIN SITU & COMPACTED SUBGRADELIMIT OF EXCAVATIONNOTES:1.THESE SECTIONS ARE FOR ESTIMATING PURPOSESONLY. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT TO LANDSCAPEARCHITECT CERTIFIED DRAWING BY A MINNESOTAPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ON STAFF WITH RETAININGWALL MANUFACTURER PRIOR TO WALL INSTALLATION.PREPARATION AND CERTIFICATION TO BE PAID FORBY THE CONTRACTOR. SECTION AND ELEVATION OFEACH WALL REQUIRED.2.ALL SOIL PARAMETERS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY AGEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT OR SITE ENGINEERPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IF ACTUAL SITECONDITIONS DIFFER FROM THOSE ASSUMED, NOTIFYMANUFACTURER OF C.M.U. RETAINING WALL 72HOURS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.3.RAILING IS REQUIRED ON RETAINING WALLS INLOCATIONS WHERE DIFFERENCES IN GRADE ONEITHER SIDE OF THE WALL ARE IN EXCESS OF 2.5' ANDARE LOCATED CLOSER THAN 4' TO A WALK, PATH,PARKING AREA, OR DRIVE ACCESS ON THE HIGHSIDE-SEE PLANS.4.COORDINATE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OFRAILING POSTS AND FOOTINGS DURING THEINSTALLATION OF WALL MATERIALS.5.COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF RAIL POSTS ANDFOOTINGS WITH INSTALLATION AND LOCATION OFGEOGRID REINFORCEMENT. AT NO POINTTHROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACTSHALL CONTRACTOR ALTER THE INTEGRITY OF THEGEOGRID OR WALL MATERIALS.6.AIR DRIVE RAILING FOOTINGS AS SPECIFIED AND IN AMANNER TO NOT DISTURB THE WALL GEOGRID ASRECOMMENDED BY THE WALL MANUFACTURER.COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OFRAILING FOOTING WITH WALL MANUFACTURER TOOBSERVE INSTALLATION OF RAILING FOOTINGS.CAP BLOCKIN SITUSUBGRADE.APPROX. 4', SEE MANUF.SPECS. & SHOP DWG.RETAINING WALL SYSTEM, INSTALL PER MANUF. SPECS./INSTRUCT. ADJ. PVMT./FINISH SEE PLANS AND DETAILS "SLEEVE-IT" POST ANCHOR SYSTEM,INSTALL PER MANUF. COORD. W/RETAINING WALL CONTRACTOR.8BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - ALL TYPESN T S"A" WEAR COURSE (MNDOT2360 - SPWEA340B)TACK COAT (MNDOT 2357)"B" BASE COURSE (MNDOT2360 - SPNWB330B)"C" CLASS 5 AGGREGATESUBBASE (MNDOT 3138)COMPACTED SUBGRADE(100% OF STANDARDPROCTOR MAX. DRYDENSITY)PAVEMENT DESIGNTYPEWEAR (A)BASE (B)AGG.(C)NOTE:IF NO DESIGN IS DEFINED IN ABOVE CHART, SEEGEOTECH REPORT FOR FINAL PAVEMENT SECTION.IF DESIGN IS DEFINED IN ABOVE CHART, IT SHOULD BECONSIDERED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TOGEOTECH FOR FINAL PAVEMENT SECTION.1LIGHT DUTY1.5"2.0"9.0"HEAVY DUTY2.0"2.0"12.0"FINISHED GRADENOTES:1.INSTALLATION SHALL BE CERTIFIED AND IN ACCORDANCE TO AN ON-SITE A.C.I. TECHNICIAN AS SPECIFIED.2.SEE GEO-TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GROSS WEIGHT REQUIREMENTS.3.IF NO DESIGN IS DEFINED IN CHART, SEE GEOTECH REPORT FOR FINAL PAVEMENT SECTION.4.IF DESIGN IS DEFINED IN CHART, IT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TO GEOTECH FORFINAL PAVEMENT SECTION.CONCRETE PVMT./WALK/PAD- NO FIBERN T S (PRIVATE PROPERTY)SAW CUT JOINT,SEE DETAIL (TYP.)LIGHT BROOM FINISHPERPENDICULAR TOTRAFFIC"A" CONCRETE ASSPECIFIED"B" CLASS 5 AGGREGATEBASECOMPACTED SUBGRADETHIS OCCURS ONLY WHEREMULCH MEETS EDGE OF WALKLEAVE TOP OF MULCH DOWN1" FROM TOP OF WALKPAVEMENT DESIGNTYPECONC. (A)AGG.(B)CURING:1. APPLY CURING COMPOUNDS IMMEDIATELY UPON FINAL FINISHING OF CONC. SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE WITHMANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTION AND THE SPECIFICATIONS BELOW.2. ALL CONC. SURFACES SHALL HAVE CURING COMPOUNDS ALLIED PER ASTM C-1315. AT 200 S.F. PER GAL.3. ALL CURING COMPOUNDS SHALL BE TYPE 1 (CLEAR) AND CONTAIN ACRYLIC BASED CLASS B RESTRICTED RESIN SOLIDS.JOINT DEPTH T/42WALKS5"6"CONC. PVMT.8"8"DOWELED JOINT BETWEEN TWO PAVEMENTSN T S"D" - DENOTES DOWEL DIAMETER"T" - DENOTES PAVEMENT THICKNESSNOTES:1.EITHER ONE PIECE OR THREADED SPLIT-TYPE DOWELMAY BE USED.2.USE THICKENED EDGE ON NEW PAVEMENT WHENEXISTING PAVEMENT HAS THICKENED EDGE.DRILL & GROUT DOWELEPOXY COATEDDOWEL SCHEDULEDOWEL SIZEDIA.LENGTHSPACING8" OR LESS34"16"12" 0.C.9" - 11"1"16"12" 0.C.12"-15"1-1/4"20"15" O.C.16" OR MORE1-1/2"20"18" O.C.16" OR MORE1-1/2"22"24" O.C."T""T"/2 +/- "D"/2PROPOSED NEW PVMT/CURB OF OTHER CONC STRUCTURE,SEE PLANEXISTING PVMT. OR EXISTING/PROPOSED NEW PVMT./CURBOR OTHER CONC. STRUCTURE, SEE PLAN3N T SB-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER7" 13 1/2"6"FINISHED GRADEFINISHED GRADE3" RADIUS CORNERS1:3 BATTER SLOPE GUTTER 3/4"/1'0.5% SLOPE-CONSTRUCT WITH REVERSESLOPE GUTTER WHERE THE PAVEMENTSLOPES AWAY FROM CURB1/2" RADIUS6"8"12"CLASS 5 AGGREGATE SUB-BASE,COORD. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTDETAIL (6" MIN.)COMPACTED SUB-BASE, EXIST.NATIVE OR PER SOILS REPORTNOTE:1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 10'-0" O.C. +/-2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOIL CONDITIONS1/2" RADIUS57"24"FINISHED GRADENOTES:1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 10'-0" O.C. +/-2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOIL CONDITIONS6"VALLEY GUTTERN T SADJ. PVMT. SECTION, OR OTHER MATERIALS, SEEPLANCAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTERSEE GRADING PLAN FOR LONGITUDINAL SLOPEADJ. PVMT. SECTION, LAWN, BIT.PVMT., OR OTHER MATERIALS,SEE PLANCOMPACTED CLASS 5 AGGREGATEBASE, SEE SOIL REPORT FOR DEPTH,6" MIN.COMPACTED SUB-BASE, NATIVE SOILOR AS PER SOILS REPORTRECOMMENDATIONSFINISHED GRADE12"34"620"FINISHED GRADENOTES:1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 10'-0" O.C. +/-2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOIL CONDITIONS6"6"RIBBON CURBN T SADJ. PVMT. SECTION, OR OTHERMATERIALS, SEE PLANCONTINUOUS SLOPE CONCRETE "CURB"SLOPE ACROSS CURB 34" PER 1'-0"ADJ. PVMT. SECTION, LAWN, BIT. PVMT., OROTHER MATERIALS, SEE PLANCOMPACTED CLASS 5 AGGREGATEBASE, SEE SOIL REPORT FOR DEPTH,6" MIN.COMPACTED SUB-BASE, NATIVE SOILOR AS PER SOILS REPORTRECOMMENDATIONSFINISHED GRADE7"7D 24"3H:1V MAX.BIO-FILTRATION BASIN (RAIN GARDEN - TYP.)N T S1.INSTALL SILT FENCE AND/OR OTHER APPROPRIATE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROLDEVICES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING OR ENTERING THE PRACTICE DURINGCONSTRUCTION.2.ALL DOWN-GRADIENT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S MUST BE IN PLACE BEFOREANY UP-GRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY BEGINS.3.PERFORM CONTINUOUS INSPECTIONS OF EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES.4.INSTALL UTILITIES (WATER, SANITARY SEWER, ELECTRIC, PHONE, FIBER OPTIC, ETC) PRIORTO THE STORMWATER SYSTEM.5.ROUGH GRADE THE SITE. IF BIORETENTION AREAS ARE BEING USED AS TEMPORARYSEDIMENT BASINS, LEAVE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET OF COVER OVER THE PRACTICE TOPROTECT THE UNDERLYING SOILS FROM CLOGGING.6.PERFORM ALL OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS.7.PLANT ALL AREAS AFTER DISTURBANCE.8.CONSTRUCT BIORETENTION DEVICE UPON STABILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGEAREA.9.IMPLEMENT TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES.10.PLANT AND/OR ROCK MULCH BIORETENTION DEVICE.11.REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGEAREA IS ADEQUATELY VEGETATED.GENERAL NOTES1.IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING OR IMMEDIATELYFOLLOWING EXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PRACTICE PRIORTO CONTINUING CONSTRUCTION.2.GRADING OF BIORETENTION DEVICES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LOW-COMPACTIONEARTH-MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF UNDERLYING SOILS.3.ALL SUB MATERIALS BELOW THE SPECIFIED BIORETENTION DEPTH (ELEVATION) SHALL BEUNDISTURBED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.4.SEE UTILITY PLAN / SHOP DRAWINGS FOR SYSTEM LAYOUT.CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCINGADJACENT PVMT.RIBBON CURB OR CURB CUT,SEE SITE AND GRADING PLANSGRASS PRETREATMENT STRIP ORPRETREATMENT STRUCTURE, SEEUTILITY AND LANDSCAPE PLANSUNDISTURBED, UNCOMPACTED IN-SITU SOILNETLESS EROSION BLANKET INBOTTOM OF BASIN. SLIT BLANKET TOALLOW PLANT MATERIAL SURFACE IFPLUG PLANTING IS TO BE USED, SEEGRADING AND LANDSCAPE PLANSMIN. PLANTING MEDIUM DEPTH 24"WITH A WELL BLENDED MIXTURE (BY VOLUME):70% HOMOGENOUS CONSTRUCTION SAND30% ORGANIC COMPOST4"1.5'UNDERDRAIN GRAVEL BLANKET1-1.5" DOUBLE WASHED STONE(NON LIMESTONE OR CONCRETE MATERIAL)NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE (MnDOT 3733, TYPE 1 - HIGHFLOW RATE)AROUND GRAVEL BLANKET - EXTENDING 1.5'FROM SIDES OF UNDERDRAIN PIPE6" PVC PERF. DRAIN TILE PIPEWITH 4 ROWS OF PERFORATIONSON BOTTOM PER MNDOT 3245.LOCATION AS SHOWN ON THEPLANSSEE GRADING PLAN FOR DEPTHPLANT MATERIAL, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSIDE SLOPE TREATMENTS, SEE GRADING OR LANDSCAPE PLANS6-8" CRUSHED ANGULAR RIPRAP IN BOTTOM OF BASINCONSTRUCTION SAND(UNDER ROCK WINDOWONLY)11348 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION08/13/25CITY SUBMITTAL09/09/25CITY RESUBMITTALPROJECT MANAGERPATRICK SARVERCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 X 702DRAWN BYAM, ZH, WBREVIEWED BYRB,PSPROJECT NUMBER25102EDEN SPRINGS CHANHASSAN, MN LIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LCC 168 PIONEER TRAIL NOX 129, CHASKA, MN 5531858960ANDERS S. MELBYLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.09/09/25Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERC5.4CIVIL DETAILSREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONCONCRETE OUTLET STRUCTUREN T S15" HDPE OUTLETELEV=947.5012" HDPE INLETELEV=952.50RIM ELEV=955.20SEE UTILITYPLAN FORSIZEDEPTH VARIES, SEE UTILITY PLANBASES SHALL BE 8"STANDARD PRECAST WITH2" LEAN GROUT, ORPOURED 8" SLABREINFORCED WITH 6"X6"10/10 MESHSTORM SEWER PIPE - SEEUTILITY PLAN FOR LOCATION,INVERT, AND SIZESMIN. 2 AND MAX. 5ADJUSTING RINGS. GROUTBETWEEN RINGS, CASTING,AND ALONG OUTSIDE.METAL SEWER CASTINGREFER TO STRUCTURESCHEDULE FOR TYPE"RIM ELEVATION"PRECAST COVER - 8" THICKPRECAST CONCRETE SECTIONRUBBER GASKET - TYP. AT ALL JOINTSSTORM SEWER PIPE - SEEUTILITY PLAN FOR LOCATION,INVERT, AND SIZES6" DRAIN TILE INLETIE=949.00NOTES:1. NO STRUCTURE SHALL BE ORDERED UNTIL THE ENGINEER APPROVES THE SHOP DRAWING.2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING THE POND OUTLET SKIMMER PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE.ALL DOGHOUSES SHALL BEGROUTED ON INSIDE ANDOUTSIDE. ALL GROUTING SHALLBE NON-SHRINKING CEMENT"W" * WALL CONSTRUCTIONSHALL BE CLASS II PRECASTPIPE, MNDOT STANDARDPLATE NO. 3000L3RIPRAP @ FLARED END SECTIONN T S4114BBAAPLAN1SECTION B-B231SECTION A-A123GRANULAR FILTER BLANKET1.0'RIP RAPTABLE OF QUANTITIESRIPRAP AT RCP OUTLETSCLASS IId50 = 6"CLASS IIId50 = 9"CLASS IVd50 = 12"DIA. OFROUNDPIPE (IN)L (FT)12" DEPTHRIP RAP(CY)6" DEPTHGRANULARFILTER (CY)18" DEPTHRIPRAP (CY)9" DEPTHGRANULARFILTER (CY)24" DEPTHRIPRAP (CY)12" DEPTHGRANULARFILTER (CY)1282.81.44.12.15.52.81582.91.54.42.25.82.918103.92.05.93.07.83.921104.22.16.33.28.44.224125.52.88.34.211.05.527125.82.98.74.411.65.830147.33.710.95.514.57.336169.24.613.86.918.39.2421810.95.516.38.221.710.9482012.96.519.49.725.812.9TABLE OF QUANTITIESRIPRAP AT RCP - A OUTLETS OR BOXES OF EQUIVALENT SPAN WIDTHCLASS IId50 = 6"CLASS IIId50 = 9"CLASS IVd50 = 12"SPAN OFPIPE ARCH(IN)L (FT)12" DEPTHRIP RAP(CY)6" DEPTHGRANULARFILTER (CY)18" DEPTHRIPRAP (CY)9" DEPTHGRANULARFILTER (CY)24" DEPTHRIPRAP (CY)12" DEPTHGRANULARFILTER (CY)22103.92.05.93.07.83.928125.52.88.24.110.95.536147.23.610.85.414.37.243169.24.613.76.918.39.2511810.95.516.38.221.710.9582012.76.419.09.525.412.7NOTES:·PIPE SIZES LARGER THAN THOSE SHOWN REQUIRE A SPECIAL DESIGN.·REQUIREMENTS FOR RIPRAP SIZE AND THICKNESS AND FILTER BLANKET WILL BE DESIGNATED IN THE PLANS.·FOR PIPES GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 30", USE 1.5'.·THE CONTRACTOR, AT HIS OPTION, MAY SUBSTITUTE A GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, MNDOT SPEC. 3733, FOR THE GRANULARFILTER BLANKET UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS. THE FABRIC SHOULD COVER THE AREA OF THE RIPRAPAND EXTEND UNDER THE CULVERT APRON 3 FT.·DIMENSION E IS GIVEN ON MNDOT STANDARD PLATES 3100 AND 3110.2GRANULAR FILTER BLANKETRIP RAP2'1.0'E2'2'2'DIA. ORSPANL1 OUTLET / OVERFLOW STABILIZATIONN T SEARTH DIKE4:1 SIDESLOPESSECTION A-AISOMETRIC VIEW4 FT MIN.TOP WIDTHL = 8 FT.2 FT MIN.6 IN MIN.WEIR CRESTINSTALL ENKAMAT PERMANUF. SPECIFICATIONSEARTH BERMFLOWFLOWF L OW SEE GRADIGN PLAN FORBASIN DEPTHGROUND LINE /BASIN BOTTOMENKAMAT ORAPPROVED ALTERNATEEARTH BERMREFER TO GRADINGPLAN FOR ELEVATIONS2349 Centerline of Creek12" DIP12" DIP12" RCP 12" RCP12" RCPW 78th St(A Public R/W)Parcel ID: 250100900Address: 1680 W 78th StOwner: Trust for the Benefitof Joy M Gorra C/O Joy MGorra and Doris ButlParcel ID: 250110200Address: 1456 78th StOwner: City of Chanhassen42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)Centerline of Creek12" DIP12" DIP12" RCP 12" RCP12" RCPW 78th St(A Public R/W)Parcel ID: 250100900Address: 1680 W 78th StOwner: Trust for the Benefitof Joy M Gorra C/O Joy MGorra and Doris ButlParcel ID: 250110200Address: 1456 78th StOwner: City of Chanhassen42" RCP (Per Rec)42" RCP (Per Rec)25' PKG. STBK. (MIN.)SEE WETLAND BUFFER EXHIBIT ON C2.0 FORREQUIRED AND PROPOSED BUFFER AREASDO NOT ENCROACH ON WETLAND50' BLDG. STBK. (MIN.)NO PARKINGNO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKINGCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS521A34BCD6COUNTER LOBBYFIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTICALSOILEDUTILITY /LAUNDRYSTORAGETOILETMECHDISHROOM /PANTRYJANITORCLEAN LINEN /FLOORMACHINECHARGING109MECHMECHSALON /PODIATRYMED ROOMLIBRARY /CONFERENCE/ SENSORYCLOSETADMINISTRATORTUB ROOM/ TOILETCLEANUTILITY /BREAKROOMMECHVESTIBULEGREATROOMKITCHENREFRIGERATOR3-COMPARTMENTSINKDISHWASHERPANTRY ITEMSFREEZERPANTRY ITEMSPANTRY TALLCABINETCLEAN DISHCARTDIRTY DISHCART SOILED INCLEAN OUTPANTRY CARTPANTRY CARTUNIT 1-CUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-EACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 2-FRUBBISHENCLOSUREUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-D149' - 7 1/2"54' - 2 1/8"5' - 0 5/8"24' - 11 1/4"5' - 0 5/8"60' - 4 7/8"6' - 8"6' - 5 3/4" 27' - 2 1/4" 27' - 1 1/2" 27' - 2 1/4" 2' - 11"6' - 4"PHASE 1PHASE 252' - 10 3/4"12' - 6 3/4"FIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTRICALCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSBUCKTHORN / INVASIVESPECIES REMOVAL1 - PB1 - UP1 - GI6 - BV4 - UP2 - SINO MOW FESCUE GRASSDRY PRAIRIE SEED MIXMULCH, TYP.SEE SECHEDULE3 - SI3 - PP6 - WF6 - WF3 - AO5 - CS2 - BV5 - CS11 - CK8 - AV9 - AV9 - AV9 - CK3 - RA14 - PB215 - PB25 - SM9 - CK11 - AV15 - DC3 - WF3 - WF4 - GD1 - PB1 - PB6 - MS3 - MR3 - BR3 - BR5 - CS11 - HS8 - LR5 - CR5 - CH8 - NW8 - HX9 - RA6 - AV10 - AV7 - NW9 - HX9 - RA6 - HX16 - TT8 - WF17 - HJ225 - DC8 - TT7 - SM7 - SM10 - TTTURF TYP.SYTHETIC TURF OR SODTYP.6 - OV4 - GI1 - GP1 - GP5 - CISUBTOTAL:147SYMBOLCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMEQTYSIZEGROUND COVERSSHREDDED CEDAR MULCH 3" DEEP / SHREDDED CEDAR MULCH4,784 sfMulchSUNNY LAWN MIX / TURF SEED2,891 sfSeed MixMNDOT - SEED MIXESMN SEED MIX #35-221 DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL, / MNDOT - GENERAL RESTORATION SEED MIX14,246 sfSeed MixMN SEED MIX #34-262 WET PRAIRIE / MNDOT - LOWER BASIN SEED MIX2,840 sfSeed MixSHOOTING STAR - SEED MIXESNO MOW FINE FESCUE MIX, SHOOTING STAR EQ / NO MOW SEED MIX17,854 sfSeed MixSPECIALTY SURFACING2,127 sfSynthetic TurfPLANT SCHEDULEL1.0LANDSCAPE PLANCOPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION08/13/25CITY SUBMITTAL09/09/25CITY RESUBMITTALPROJECT MANAGERPATRICK SARVERCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 X 702DRAWN BYAM, ZH, WBREVIEWED BYRB,PSPROJECT NUMBER25102EDEN SPRINGS CHANHASSAN, MN LIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LCC 168 PIONEER TRAIL NOX 129, CHASKA, MN 5531824904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.09/09/25Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNER 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ONLY PLANT MATERIAL FREE OF NEONICOTINOID BASED INSECTICIDES AND/OR TREATMENTS OF ANYKIND, INCLUDING BY NOT LIMITED TO IMIDACLOPRID (CONFIDOR, ADMIRE, GAUCHO, ADVOCATE), THIAMETHOXAM (ACTARA, PLATINUM,CRUISER), CLOTHIANIDIN (PONCHO, DANTOSU, DANTOP), ACETAMIPRID (MOSPILAN, ASSAIL, CHIPCOTRISTAR), THIACLOPRID (CALYPSO),DINOTEFURAN (STARKLE, SAFARI, VENOM), AND NITENPYRAM (CAPSTAR, GUARDIAN).2.CONTRACTOR SHALL CERTIFY, THROUGH SUPPLIERS POLICY STATEMENT OR AFFIDAVIT, THAT NO NEONICOTINOID BASED INSECTICIDESHAVE BEEN USED ON SITE OR DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE GROWING OR STORAGE PLOTS OF THE SUPPLIED PLANT MATERIAL, INCLUDINGTHE PLANTING OF AGRICULTURAL (OR OTHER) SEED TREATED WITH NEONICS..POLLINATOR SAFE PLANT MATERIAL:LANDSCAPE NOTES:PROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUB SYMBOLS - SEEPLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANTSCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESPROPOSED CANOPY TREE SYMBOLS - SEEPLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIESAND PLANTING SIZESLANDSCAPE PLAN LEGEND:EDGING - SHALL BE COMMERCIAL GRADE, 4" DEPTH ALUMINUM,BLACK OR DARK GREEN IN COLOR, INCLUDE ALL CONNECTORS,STAKES, & ALL APPURTENANCES PER MANUF. INSTALL PER MANUF.INSTRUC./SPECS.PLANTING SEASON SCHEDULESEASONCONIFEROUSDECIDUOUSREMARKSSPRING PLANTINGAPRIL 15 - JUNE 15APRIL 15 - JUNE 15FALL PLANTINGAUGUST 21 - SEPTEMBER 30AUGUST 15 - NOVEMBER 15NOTE: ADJUSTMENTS TO PLANTING DATES MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION01" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRMULCH SCHEDULEAREAMULCH TYPEEDGINGFABRICREMARKSTREE RINGS4" DEPTH, SHREDDED CEDARNONOSEE DETAIL SHT. L1.1PLANTING BEDS4" DEPTH, SHREDDED CEDARYESNOMAINT. STRIP AT BUILDING FOUNDATION4" DEPTH, SHREDDED CEDARYESNONATIVE SEED AREASEROSION CONTROL NETTINGNANAEROSION CONTROL NETTING PER MNDOTSPECNOTE: COORDINATE ALL MULCH AND PLANTING BED MATERIAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, PROVIDE SAMPLES AND SHOP DRAWINGS/PHOTOS/DATA SHEETS OF ALLMATERIALS1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.REFERENCE MULCH SCHEDULE FOR MULCH MATERIALS AND LOCATIONS.3.ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED CEDAR MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A MINIMUM OF2" FROM TREE TRUNK.4.IF SHOWN ON PLAN, RANDOM SIZED LIMESTONE BOULDERS COLOR AND SIZE TO COMPLIMENT NEW LANDSCAPING. OWNER TO APPROVE BOULDER SAMPLES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.5.PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE AND DISFIGURATION.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURATION OF ACCEPTANCE PERIOD.6.UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN.7.CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT SHALLBE WARRANTED FOR TWO (2) FULL GROWING SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE.8.ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 6" LAYER TOPSOIL AND SOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS.9.COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORS AND WINDOWS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE IN THE FIELD FINALLOCATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.10.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE.11.REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES.12.SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES.13.PROVIDE SITE WIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLY PROGRAMMABLE AND CAPABLE OF ALTERNATE DATE WATERING. THE SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDEHEAD TO HEAD OR DRIP COVERAGE AND BE CAPABLE OF DELIVERING ONE INCH OF PRECIPITATION PER WEEK. SYSTEM SHALL EXTEND INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE EDGE OFPAVEMENT/BACK OF CURB.14.CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE APPROVAL OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM INCLUDING PRICING FROM OWNER, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.CITY REQUIRED LANDSCAPING:PER ARTICLE XXV. LANDSCAPING & TREE REMOVAL FROM THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN.PROPOSED ZONING: (HD PUD) - HIGH DENSITY PUD DISTRICTSITE AREA:155,251 SFTOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA:57,955 SF (37.3%)TOTAL OPEN SPACE PROPOSED:101,672 SF (62.7%)SCREENING REQUIREMENTS:SCREEN REQ'D ON ALL VISUAL IMPACTS:TRASH ENCLOSURE (PROVIDED)UTILITY PADS (PROVIDED)SCREEN PARKING LOT PERIMETER (PROVIDED)FOUNDATION & AESTHETIC PLANTINGS REQUIRED:LANDSCAPING REQ'D AROUND PERIMETER OF BUILDING FOOTPRINT. (PROVIDED)BUFFER YARD REQUIREMENTS:NORTH BOUNDARY: ADJACENT (RR) / (LL/LD) DISTRICT - BUFFER YARD C REQ'DEXISTING VEGETATION PROVIDED, NO ADDITIONAL SCREENING ADDEDEAST BOUNDARY: ADJACENT (RR) / (LL/LD) DISTRICT - BUFFER YARD C REQ'D10' BUFFER YARD; 2.7 CANOPY TREES, 5.4 UNDERSTORY TREES, 8.1 SHRUBS PER 100 LF135 LF / 100 LF = 1.35; (THE NORTH 65 LF OF BOUNDARY IS EXISTING BUFFER VEGETATION)1.35 X 2.7 CANOPY = 3.65 CANOPY TREES REQ'D (4 PROVIDED)1.35 X 5.4 UNDERSTORY = 7.29 UNDERSTORY REQ'D (9 PROVIDED)1.35 X 8.1 SHRUBS = 10.94 SHRUBS REQ'D (21 PROVIDED)SOUTH BOUNDARY: ADJACENT PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY - BUFFER YARD B REQ'D15' BUFFER YARD; 2 CANOPY TREES, 4 UNDERSTORY TREES, & 6 SHRUBS PER 100 LF360 LF / 100 LF = 3.6;3.6 X 2 CANOPY = 7.2 REQ'D (8 PROVIDED)3.6 X 4 UNDERSTORY = 14.4 REQ'D (15 PROVIDED)3.6 X 6 SHRUBS = 21.6 REQ'D (30 PROVIDED)WEST BOUNDARY: ADJACENT (RR) / (LL/LD) DISTRICT - BUFFER YARD C REQ'D15' BUFFER YARD; 3 CANOPY TREES, 6 UNDERSTORY TREES, 9 SHRUBS PER 100 LF235 / 100 = 2.35;2.35 x 3 CANOPY = 7.05 REQ'D (8 PROVIDED)2.35 X 6 UNDERSTORY = 14.1 REQ'D (15 PROVIDED)2.35 X 9 SHRUBS = 21.15 REQ'D (22 PROVIDED)INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING:8 SF LANDSCAPING AREA REQ'D FOR EACH 100 SF OF PARKING LOT AREA18,070 SF / 100 = 180.07 X 8 = 1,440.56 SF REQ'D INTERIOR LANDSCAPING (2,725 SF PROVIDED)DIVISION 3. - SEC. 20-1179 - LANDSCAPE BUDGETPROJECT VALUE: OVER $4,000,000 = MINIMUM LANDSCAPE VALUE OF 1%(.01 X 4,000,000 = $40,000)OTHER REQUIREMENTS:ALL NEW PLANTING AREAS MUST HAVE AN IRRIGATION SYSTEM INSTALLED. PER SEC. 20-1181.REQUIRED PLANT INSTALL SIZE:DECIDUOUS: MIN. 10' HT., OR 2-1/2" CAL.EVERGREEN: MIN. 6' HT. AND MIN 1-1/2" CAL. FOR UNDERSTORY; MIN. 8' HT. OVERSTORYSHRUBS: DECIDUOUS - 2' MIN. HT.; EVERGREEN - 2' HT. AND 2' DIAMETER350 HYD. & GV PERCITY STANDARDSSYMBOLCODECOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMEQTYCONTTREESAOStanding Ovation™ Serviceberry / Amelanchier alnifolia 'Obelisk'61.5" CAL. B&BBVPrairie Dream® Paper Birch / Betula papyrifera 'Varen'61.5" CAL. B&BBRRoyal Frost Birch / Betula x 'Royal Frost'61.5" CAL. B&BCIThornless Cockspur Hawthorn / Crataegus crus-galli inermis51.5" CAL. B&BGPPrinceton Sentry Maidenhair Tree / Ginkgo biloba 'Princeton Sentry'22.5" CAL. B&BGISkyline® Honey Locust / Gleditsia triacanthos inermis 'Skycole'53.5" CAL. B&BGDKentucky Coffeetree / Gymnocladus dioicus 'Espresso'43.5" CAL. B&BMRRoyal Gem Crabapple / Malus x 'Royal Gem'31.5" CAL. B&BMSSpring Snow Crabapple / Malus x 'Spring Snow'61.5" CAL. B&BOVAmerican Hophornbeam / Ostrya virginiana61.5" CAL. B&BPBBlack Hills Spruce / Picea glauca densata66` HT. B&BPPPrairie Gold® Quaking Aspen / Populus tremuloides 'NE Arb'33.5" CAL. B&BSIIvory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac / Syringa reticulata 'Ivory Silk'51.5" CAL. B&BUPPrinceton American Elm / Ulmus americana 'Princeton'53.5" CAL. B&BSUBTOTAL:68SYMBOLCODECOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMEQTYSIZESHRUBSCHIvory Halo® Tatarian Dogwood / Cornus alba 'Bailhalo'5#5 CONTCRRed Gnome™ Tatarian Dogwood / Cornus alba 'Regnzam'5#5 CONTCSRed Twig Dogwood / Cornus stolonifera23#5 CONTLRKodiak® Orange Diervilla / Diervilla x 'G2X88544'8#5 CONTHSFirefly Nightglow Bush Honeysuckle / Diervilla x splendens 'El Madrigal'12#5 CONTNWWalker's Low Catmint / Nepeta x 'Walker's Low'28#5 CONTPB2Diabolo® Ninebark / Physocarpus opulifolius 'Monlo'29#5 CONTRAFragrant Sumac / Rhus aromatica21#5 CONTSMDwarf Korean Lilac / Syringa meyeri 'Palibin'19#5 CONTTTTaunton's Anglo-Japanese Yew / Taxus x media 'Tauntonii'34#5 CONTTBTechnito® Arborvitae / Thuja occidentalis 'Bail John'5#5 CONTWFShining Sensation™ Weigelia / Weigela florida 'Bokrashine'30#5 CONTSUBTOTAL:219PERENNIALSAVVision in Pink Chinese Astilbe / Astilbe chinensis 'Vision in Pink'57#1 CONTCKKarl Foerster Feather Reed Grass / Calamagrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Foerster'25#1 CONTDCCranberry Ice Dianthus / Dianthus x 'Cranberry Ice'25#1 CONTHXSunday Gloves Daylily / Hemerocallis x 'Sunday Gloves'23#1 CONTHJ2June Hosta / Hosta x 'June'17#1 CONTPLANT SCHEDULEL1.1LANDSCAPE PLANNOTES & DETAILSCOPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION08/13/25CITY SUBMITTAL09/09/25CITY RESUBMITTALPROJECT MANAGERPATRICK SARVERCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 X 702DRAWN BYAM, ZH, WBREVIEWED BYRB,PSPROJECT NUMBER25102EDEN SPRINGS CHANHASSAN, MN LIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LCC 168 PIONEER TRAIL NOX 129, CHASKA, MN 5531824904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.09/09/25Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNER 1.ENTIRE SITE SHALL BE FULLY IRRIGATED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT IRRIGATION SHOPDRAWINGS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.2.PROVIDE SITE WIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLYPROGRAMMABLE AND CAPABLE OF ALTERNATE DATE WATERING. THE SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDE HEADTO HEAD OR DRIP COVERAGE AND BE CAPABLE OF DELIVERING ONE INCH OF PRECIPITATION PERWEEK. SYSTEM SHALL EXTEND INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT/BACKOF CURB.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE APPROVAL OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM INLCUDING PRICINGFROM OWNER, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.4.SEE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IRRIGATION WATER, METER,AND POWER CONNECTIONS.5.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES PRIOR TOANY EXCAVATION/INSTALLATION. ANY DAMAGE TO UNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES SHALLBE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CORRECTINGDAMAGES SHALL BE BORNE ENTIRELY BY THE CONTRACTOR.6.SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE PER LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY STANDARDS ANDSHALL BE PER NATIONAL AND LOCAL CODES. EXACT LOCATION OF SERVICE EQUIPMENT SHALL BECOORDINATED WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR EQUIVALENT AT THE JOB SITE.7.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY FOR THE PROPOSED ELECTRICALSERVICE AND METERING FACILITIES.8.IRRIGATION WATER LINE CONNECTION SIZE IS 1-12" AT BUILDING. VERIFY WITH MECHANICAL PLANS.9.ALL MAIN LINES SHALL BE 18" BELOW FINISHED GRADE.10.ALL LATERAL LINES SHALL BE 12" BELLOW FINISHED GRADE.11.ALL EXPOSED PVC RISERS, IF ANY, SHALL BE GRAY IN COLOR.12.CONTRACTOR SHALL LAY ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT AT 2'-0" BELOW THE FINISHED GRADE OF THETOP OF PAVEMENT. EXTEND SLEEVES TO 2'-0" BEYOND PAVEMENT.13.CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK THE LOCATION OF ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT WITH THE SLEEVINGMATERIAL "ELLED" TO 2'-0" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE AND CAPPED.14.FABRICATE ALL PIPE TO MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATIONS WITH CLEAN AND SQUARE CUT JOINTS.USE QUALITY GRADE PRIMER AND SOLVENT CEMENT FORMULATED FOR INTENDED TYPE OFCONNECTION.15.BACKFILL ALL TRENCHES WITH SOIL FREE OF SHARP OBJECTS AND DEBRIS.16.ALL VALVE BOXES AND COVERS SHALL BE BLACK IN COLOR.17.GROUP VALVE BOXES TOGETHER FOR EASE WHEN SERVICE IS REQUIRED. LOCATE IN PLANT BEDAREAS WHENEVER POSSIBLE.18.IRRIGATION CONTROLLER LOCATION SHALL BE VERIFIED ON-SITE WITH OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.19.CONTROL WIRES: 14 GAUGE DIRECT BURIAL, SOLID COPPER IRRIGATION WIRE. RUN UNDER MAINLINE. USE MOISTURE-PROOF SPLICES AND SPLICE ONLY AT VALVES OR PULL BOXES. RUN SEPARATEHOT AND COMMON WIRE TO EACH VALVE AND ONE (1) SPARE WIRE AND GROUND TO FURTHESTVALVE FROM CONTROLLER. LABEL OR COLOR CODE ALL WIRES.20.AVOID OVER SPRAY ON BUILDINGS, PAVEMENT, WALLS AND ROADWAYS BY INDIVIDUALLY ADJUSTINGRADIUS OR ARC ON SPRINKLER HEADS AND FLOW CONTROL ON AUTOMATIC VALVE.21.ADJUST PRESSURE REGULATING VALVES FOR OPTIMUM PRESSURE ON SITE.22.USE SCREENS ON ALL HEADS.23.A SET OF AS-BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON-SITE AT ALL TIMES IN AN UPDATEDCONDITION.24.ALL PIPE 3" AND OVER SHALL HAVE THRUST BLOCKING AT EACH TURN.25.ALL AUTOMATIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVES WILL HAVE 3" MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVELUNDERNEATH VALVE AND VALVE BOX. GRAVEL SHALL EXTENT 3" BEYOND PERIMETER OF VALVE BOX.26.THERE SHALL BE 3" MINIMUM SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX COVER AND TOP OF VALVESTRUCTURE.IRRIGATION NOTES:REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSEE SHEET L1.0 FOR GENERALLANDSCAPE NOTES & LEGENDKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRTHREE TIMES WIDTHOF ROOTBALLDECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTINGN T SPRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMALTREE SHAPE)THREE 2"X4"X8' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWN WITHTWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER. STAKESSHALL BE PLACED AT 120° TO ONE ANOTHER. WIRE SHALLBE THREADED THROUGH NYLON STRAPPING WITHGROMMETS. ALTERNATE STABILIZING METHODS MAY BEPROPOSED BY CONTRACTOR.TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 1"-2" ABOVEEXISTING GRADEMULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OFPLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH,SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLAN NOTES FORMULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT TRUNKEXISTING GRADECUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL. IFNON-BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELYSLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OFPLANTING BEDBACKFILL AS SPECIFIEDCOMPACT BOTTOM OF PIT, TYP.RULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ONLOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OROVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT1DECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS SHRUB PLANTINGN T SPRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMALSHAPE FOR SPECIES)PLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE ABOVESURROUNDING GRADEROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBALL LOOSENED TOENSURE PROPER BACKFILL-TO-ROOT CONTACTSLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OFPLANTING BEDEXISTING GRADEROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPENOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCHMIN. 2" FROM PLANT TRUNKBACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATIONDO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL.THREE TIMES WIDTHOF ROOTBALLRULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ONLOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OROVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT2DRAWN @ ? sizePERENNIAL BED PLANTINGN T SPLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE ABOVESURROUNDING GRADEROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBALL LOOSENED TOENSURE PROPER BACKFILL-TO-ROOT CONTACTSLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OFPLANTING BEDEXISTING GRADEROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPENOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCHMIN. 2" FROM PLANT STEMBACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATIONDO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL.SIZE VARIESSEE LANDSCAPE PLANMODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LOCATION OF PLANTMATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OR OVERALL PLANTPLACEMENT3FINISHED GRADE3'-0" MIN.DRAWN @ ? sizeAGGREGATE MULCHN T SFACE OF BUILDING/STRUCTURE3" LAYER OF 34" - 1 12" DIA. SMOOTH RIVERROCK. PROVIDE SAMPLE TO LANDSCAPEARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATIONGEOTEXTILE FABRICCOMPACTED SUBGRADE4351 Centerline of Creek12" RCP 12" RCP12" RCP15" RCP24" RCPW 78th St(A Public R/W)AUDUBON ROAD (A Public R/W)Centerline of Creek12" RCP 12" RCP12" RCP15" RCP24" RCPW 78th St(A Public R/W)AUDUBON ROAD (A Public R/W)CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONENTRANCEPERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCHBASINS.INLET PROTECTIONAT EXISTING CATCHBASIN TO REMAIN,TYPINSTALL DOUBLE SILT FENCEALONG EDGE OF WETLANDBUFFER, AS SHOWN, REMOVESEDIMENT WHEN HALFWAYUP FENCEPERIMETER EROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETER EROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION08/13/25CITY SUBMITTAL09/09/25CITY RESUBMITTALPROJECT MANAGERPATRICK SARVERCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 X 702DRAWN BYAM, ZH, WBREVIEWED BYRB,PSPROJECT NUMBER25102EDEN SPRINGS CHANHASSAN, MN LIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LCC 168 PIONEER TRAIL NOX 129, CHASKA, MN 5531858960ANDERS S. MELBYLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.09/09/25Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERSW1.0SWPPP - EXISTINGCONDITIONS1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES.CITY OF CHANHASSAN EROSION CONTROL NOTES:SWPPP LEGEND:EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALINLET PROTECTIONSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDRAINAGE ARROWSILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT1125ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLPRACTICES, AND MEASURES CONTAINED IN THISSWPPP ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS.ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURINGTHE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION.REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN AREAPPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLREPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGEDDURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILLREQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROLPERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.3.SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROLNOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES.4.SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSIONCONTROL NOTES.5.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPPIMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, MAINTENANCE ANDCOMPLIANCE WITH THE PERMIT.SWPPP NOTES:01" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR352 Centerline of CreekW 78th St(A Public R/W)AUDUBON ROAD (A Public R/W)Centerline of CreekW 78th St(A Public R/W)AUDUBON ROAD (A Public R/W)WETLANDSEE WETLAND BUFFER EXHIBIT ON C2.0 FORREQUIRED AND PROPOSED BUFFER AREASDO NOT ENCROACH ON WETLANDNO PARKINGNO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKINGCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSABOVEGROUNDBIO-FILTRATION BASINBOT=951.006" DT. IE=949.00OE=952.50WQL (MPCA)=951.87100-YR HWL=954.52EOF=955.50521A34BCD6COUNTER LOBBYFIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTICALSOILEDUTILITY /LAUNDRYSTORAGETOILETMECHDISHROOM /PANTRYJANITORCLEAN LINEN /FLOORMACHINECHARGING109MECHMECHSALON /PODIATRYMED ROOMLIBRARY /CONFERENCE/ SENSORYCLOSETADMINISTRATORTUB ROOM/ TOILETCLEANUTILITY /BREAKROOMMECHVESTIBULEGREATROOMKITCHENREFRIGERATOR3-COMPARTMENTSINKDISHWASHERPANTRY ITEMSFREEZERPANTRY ITEMSPANTRY TALLCABINETCLEAN DISHCARTDIRTY DISHCART SOILED INCLEAN OUTPANTRY CARTPANTRY CARTUNIT 1-CUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 1-AUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-EACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 1-BACCESSIBLEUNIT 2-FRUBBISHENCLOSUREUNIT 2-DUNIT 2-D149' - 7 1/2"54' - 2 1/8"5' - 0 5/8"24' - 11 1/4"5' - 0 5/8"60' - 4 7/8"6' - 8"6' - 5 3/4" 27' - 2 1/4" 27' - 1 1/2" 27' - 2 1/4" 2' - 11"6' - 4"PHASE 1PHASE 252' - 10 3/4"12' - 6 3/4"FIREPROTECTION/ WATER /ELECTRICALCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONENTRANCEPERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCHBASINS.INLET PROTECTIONAT EXISTING CATCHBASIN TO REMAIN,TYPINSTALL DOUBLE SILT FENCEALONG EDGE OF WETLANDBUFFER, AS SHOWN, REMOVESEDIMENT WHEN HALFWAYUP FENCEINLET PROTECTION ATPROPOSED CATCHBASIN, TYPPERIMETER EROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETER EROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION08/13/25CITY SUBMITTAL09/09/25CITY RESUBMITTALPROJECT MANAGERPATRICK SARVERCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 X 702DRAWN BYAM, ZH, WBREVIEWED BYRB,PSPROJECT NUMBER25102EDEN SPRINGS CHANHASSAN, MN LIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LCC 168 PIONEER TRAIL NOX 129, CHASKA, MN 5531858960ANDERS S. MELBYLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.09/09/25Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERSW1.1SWPPP - PROPOSEDCONDITIONS1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES.CITY OF CHANHASSAN EROSION CONTROL NOTES:SWPPP LEGEND:INLET PROTECTIONSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDRAINAGE ARROW1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMITEROSION CONTROL BLANKET1137REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN AREAPPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLREPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGEDDURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILLREQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROLPERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.3.SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROLNOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES.4.SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSIONCONTROL NOTES.5.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPPIMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, MAINTENANCE ANDCOMPLIANCE WITH THE PERMIT.SWPPP NOTES:ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLPRACTICES, AND MEASURES CONTAINED IN THISSWPPP ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS.ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURINGTHE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION.EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL112501" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR353 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION08/13/25CITY SUBMITTAL09/09/25CITY RESUBMITTALPROJECT MANAGERPATRICK SARVERCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 X 702DRAWN BYAM, ZH, WBREVIEWED BYRB,PSPROJECT NUMBER25102EDEN SPRINGS CHANHASSAN, MN LIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LCC 168 PIONEER TRAIL NOX 129, CHASKA, MN 5531858960ANDERS S. MELBYLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.09/09/25Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERSW1.2SWPPP - DETAILSREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONTYPICAL STAPLE #8GAUGE WIRE1 1/2"10"NOTE:1. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL.EROSION BLANKETN T SPLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEPMATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL.'D' EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTINGBURIED IN SILT TRENCH AND TAMPED.DOUBLE ROW OF STAPLES'C' OVERLAP: BURY UPPEREND OF LOWER STRIP AS IN 'A'AND 'B'. OVERLAP END OF TOPSTRIP 4" AND STAPLE'B' TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL.SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, 10"SPACING, 4" DOWN FROM TRENCH'A' BURY THE TOP END OF THE MATTINGIN A TRENCH 4" OR MORE IN DEPTH'E' OVERFALL1FLOWSEDIMENT BIO-ROLL / COMPOST FILTER LOGN T SNOTE:1. COMPOST FILTER LOGS (BIO ROLLS) SHALL BE FILTREXX EROSION CONTROL SOXX OR APPROVED EQUAL.2. COMPOST FILLER TO BE MADE FROM A COMPOST BLEND 30%-40% GRADE 2 (SPEC 3890) AND 60%-70% PARTIALLYDECOMPOSED WOOD CHIPS, PER MNDOT SPEC 3897.3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE GEOTEXTILE KNITTED MATERIAL WITH MAX. OPENINGS OF 3/8".4. IF MULTIPLE ROLLS NEEDED, OVERLAP BY MIN. 12" AT ENDS AND STAKE.5. SILT SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE IT REACHES 80% OF THE HEIGHT OF THE ROLL OR AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY SITECONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTION.8" MIN.EXISTING GROUND SURFACEWOODEN STAKES 1/2"X2"X16" MIN. PLACED 10' O.C. WHENINSTALLED ON GROUND. IF INSTALLED ON PVMT. PROVIDESANDBAGS BEHIND AND ON TOP AT MIN. 10' O.C.FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIEDFILLER AS SPECIFIEDFILL UPSTREAM BASE EDGEWITH 2" OF DIRT OR COMPOSTTO EMBED ROLL.2354 SW1.3SWPPP - NARRATIVEOWNER INFORMATIONTRAINING SECTION 21PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OFPERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMPERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT TO MEET NPDES PERMITREQUIREMENTS. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THEPROPOSED STORMWATER SYSTEM.AREAS AND QUANTITIES:SWPPP CONTACT PERSONCONTRACTOR:SWPPP INSPECTOR TRAINING:ALL SWPPP INSPECTIONS MUST BE PERFORMED BY APERSON THAT MEETS THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTSOF THE NPDES CONSTRUCTION SITE PERMIT.TRAINING CREDENTIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THECONTRACTOR AND KEPT ON SITE WITH THE SWPPPNOTE: QUANTITIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE FORTHEMSELVES THE EXACT QUANTITIES FOR BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION.SUPPLEMENTARY SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES:THESE NOTES SUPERCEDE ANY GENERAL SWPPP NOTES.THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN 1.0 ACRES SO AN NPDES PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THEMPCA. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES IN THE NPDES PERMIT THROUGHOUTCONSTRUCTION.SWPPP ATTACHMENTS (ONLY APPLICABLE IF SITE IS 1 ACRE OR GREATER):CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE FOLLOWING SWPPP ATTACHMENTS WHICH ARE A PART OF THE OVERALLSWPPP PACKAGE:ATTACHMENT A. CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE - SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENTATTACHMENT B. CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLISTATTACHMENT C. MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMSATTACHMENT D: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.ATTACHMENT E: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH A CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT DISTURBS SITESOIL OR WHO IMPLEMENT A POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURE IDENTIFIED IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTIONPREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGEELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT (DATED AUGUST 1, 2018 # MNR100001) AND ANY LOCAL GOVERNINGAGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION CONCERNING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL.STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTSSWPPPTHE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS REPRESENTED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTIONPLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AND SWPPP NARRATIVE (ATTACHMENT A:CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) FOR ADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP INFORMATION. THE PLANS SHOWLOCATIONS AND TYPES OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLBMP'S. STANDARD DETAILS ARE ATTACHED TO THIS SWPPP DOCUMENT.THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IS AS FOLLOWS:1. INSTALL STABILIZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE2. INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE AROUND SITE3. INSTALL ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND INFILTRATION AREAS4. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT ALL ADJACENT AND DOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS5. CLEAR AND GRUB FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND INSTALL6. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND (SECTION 14)7. CLEAR AND GRUB REMAINDER OF SITE8. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL9. ROUGH GRADING OF SITE10. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES11. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN STORM SEWER AND SERVICES12. INSTALL SILT FENCE / INLET PROTECTION AROUND CB'S13. INSTALL STREET SECTION14. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER15. BITUMINOUS ON STREETS16. FINAL GRADE BOULEVARD, INSTALL SEED AND MULCH17. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASIN / POND18. FINAL GRADE POND / INFILTRATION BASINS (DO NOT COMPACT SOILS IN INFILTRATION AREAS.)19. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED BY EITHER SEED ORSOD/LANDSCAPING, REMOVE SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL.RECORDS RETENTION:THE SWPPP (ORIGINAL OR COPIES) INCLUDING, ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCERECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY THE PERMITTEE WHO HAS OPERATIONALCONTROL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SITE. THE SWPPP CAN BE KEPT IN EITHER THE FIELD OFFICE OR IN AN ON SITEVEHICLE DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS.ALL OWNER(S) MUST KEEP THE SWPPP, ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL RECORDS, ON FILE FOR THREE(3) YEARS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT AS OUTLINED IN SECTION 4. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY RECORDSAFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT.1.THE FINAL SWPPP;2.ANY OTHER STORMWATER RELATED PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT;3.RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION (SEE SECTION 11,INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE);4.ALL PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED, INCLUDINGALL RIGHT OF WAY, CONTRACTS, COVENANTS AND OTHER BINDING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUALMAINTENANCE; AND5.ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATERMANAGEMENT SYSTEMS.SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES:1.THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE PERMITTEE(S) AS IDENTIFIED BY THE NPDES PERMIT.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON-SITE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THEACTIVITIES OF ALL OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTORS.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A PERSON(S) KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OFEROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO OVERSEE ALL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OFBMPS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSON(S) MEETING THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT TOCONDUCT INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS INACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) MUST BE AVAILABLEFOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY MPCA. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDETRAINING DOCUMENTATION FOR THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) AS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. THIS TRAININGDOCUMENTATION SHALL BE RECORDED IN OR WITH THE SWPPP BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION OR ASSOON AS THE PERSONNEL FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. DOCUMENTATION SHALL INCLUDE:4.1.NAMES OF THE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE TRAINED PERSECTION 21 OF THE PERMIT.4.2.DATES OF TRAINING AND NAME OF INSTRUCTOR AND ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING.4.3.CONTENT OF TRAINING COURSE OR WORKSHOP INCLUDING THE NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRAINING.5.FOLLOWING FINAL STABILIZATION AND THE TERMINATION OF COVERAGE FOR THE NPDES PERMIT, THE OWNERIS EXPECTED TO FURNISH LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O & M) OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTSSWPPP AMENDMENTS (SECTION 6):1.ONE OF THE INDIVIDUALS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.A OR ITEM 21.2.B OR ANOTHER QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL MUSTCOMPLETE ALL SWPPP CHANGES. CHANGES INVOLVING THE USE OF A LESS STRINGENT BMP MUST INCLUDE AJUSTIFICATION DESCRIBING HOW THE REPLACEMENT BMP IS EFFECTIVE FOR THE SITE CHARACTERISTICS.2.PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TOCORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN,CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS HAVING A SIGNIFICANTEFFECT ON THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER.3.PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TOCORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER INSPECTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS BYTHE SITE OWNER OR OPERATOR, USEPA OR MPCA OFFICIALS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE INELIMINATING OR SIGNIFICANTLY MINIMIZING THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS ORGROUNDWATER OR THE DISCHARGES ARE CAUSING WATER QUALITY STANDARD EXCEEDANCES (E.G.,NUISANCE CONDITIONS AS DEFINED IN MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) OR THE SWPPP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITHTHE OBJECTIVES OF A USEPA APPROVED TMDL.BMP SELECTION AND INSTALLATION (SECTION 7):1.PERMITTEES MUST SELECT, INSTALL, AND MAINTAIN THE BMPS IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP AND IN THIS PERMITIN AN APPROPRIATE AND FUNCTIONAL MANNER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH RELEVANT MANUFACTURERSPECIFICATIONS AND ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES.EROSION PREVENTION (SECTION 8):1.BEFORE WORK BEGINS, PERMITTEES MUST DELINEATE THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED.2.PERMITTEES MUST MINIMIZE THE NEED FOR DISTURBANCE OF PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT WITH STEEPSLOPES. WHEN STEEP SLOPES MUST BE DISTURBED, PERMITTEES MUST USE TECHNIQUES SUCH AS PHASINGAND STABILIZATION PRACTICES DESIGNED FOR STEEP SLOPES (E.G., SLOPE DRAINING AND TERRACING).3.PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS, INCLUDING STOCKPILES. STABILIZATION MUST BEINITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION WHEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY ORTEMPORARILY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING 14CALENDAR DAYS. STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THECONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON CONSTRUCTED BASECOMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ONTEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEANAGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) BUT PERMITTEES MUSTPROVIDE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF THE STOCKPILE.4.FOR PUBLIC WATERS THAT THE MINNESOTA DNR HAS PROMULGATED "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" DURINGSPECIFIED FISH SPAWNING TIME FRAMES, PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOILAREAS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE WATER'S EDGE, AND THAT DRAIN TO THESE WATERS, WITHIN 24 HOURSDURING THE RESTRICTION PERIOD.5.PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF THE LAST 200 LINEAR FEET OFTEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES OR SWALES THAT DRAIN WATER FROM THE SITE WITHIN 24HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETESTABILIZATION OF REMAINING PORTIONS OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES WITHIN 14CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE AND CONSTRUCTION INTHAT PORTION OF THE DITCH TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES.6.TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEMDURING CONSTRUCTION (WITH PROPERLY DESIGNED ROCK-DITCH CHECKS, BIO ROLLS, SILT DIKES, ETC.) DONOT NEED TO BE STABILIZED. PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THESE AREAS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THEIR USEAS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM CEASES7.PERMITTEES MUST NOT USE MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, POLYACRYLAMIDE OR SIMILAR EROSIONPREVENTION PRACTICES WITHIN ANY PORTION OF THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF A TEMPORARY ORPERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE SECTION WITH A CONTINUOUS SLOPE OF GREATER THAN 2 PERCENT.8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION AT ALL PIPE OUTLETS WITHIN24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER OR PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM.9.PERMITTEES MUST NOT DISTURB MORE LAND (I.E., PHASING) THAN CAN BE EFFECTIVELY INSPECTED ANDMAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 11.SEDIMENT CONTROL (SECTION 9):1.PERMITTEES MUST ESTABLISH SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ON ALL DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETERS OF THE SITEAND DOWNGRADIENT AREAS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TO ANY SURFACE WATER, INCLUDING CURB ANDGUTTER SYSTEMS. PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES UPGRADIENT OF ANY BUFFERZONES. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENTLAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN AND MUST KEEP THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES IN PLACE UNTILTHEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER.2.IF DOWNGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE OVERLOADED, BASED ON FREQUENT FAILURE OR EXCESSIVEMAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLPRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING AND AMEND THE SWPPP TO IDENTIFYTHESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES AS REQUIRED IN ITEM 6.3.3.TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS DESIGNED AS PART OF A SEDIMENTCONTAINMENT SYSTEM (E.G., DITCHES WITH ROCK-CHECK DAMS) REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICESONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITE CONDITIONS.4.A FLOATING SILT CURTAIN PLACED IN THE WATER IS NOT A SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP TO SATISFY ITEM 9.2EXCEPT WHEN WORKING ON A SHORELINE OR BELOW THE WATERLINE. IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT TERMCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (E.G., INSTALLATION OF RIP RAP ALONG THE SHORELINE) IN THAT AREA ISCOMPLETE, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL AN UPLAND PERIMETER CONTROL PRACTICE IF EXPOSED SOILS STILLDRAIN TO A SURFACE WATER.5.PERMITTEES MUST RE-INSTALL ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ADJUSTED OR REMOVED TOACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES,IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. PERMITTEES MUST RE-INSTALL SEDIMENTCONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS NOTCOMPLETE.6.PERMITTEES MUST PROTECT ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS USING APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTIONUNTIL THEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER ON ALL AREAS WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET.7.PERMITTEES MAY REMOVE INLET PROTECTION FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (E.G.STREET FLOODING/FREEZING) IS IDENTIFIED BY THE PERMITTEES OR THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY (E.G.,CITY/COUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER). PERMITTEES MUSTDOCUMENT THE NEED FOR REMOVAL IN THE SWPPP.8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OFSTOCKPILES ON THE DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER.9.PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE STOCKPILES OUTSIDE OF NATURAL BUFFERS OR SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDINGSTORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACEFOR THE STORMWATER. 10. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A VEHICLE TRACKING BMP TO MINIMIZE THE TRACK OUT OF SEDIMENT FROM THECONSTRUCTION SITE OR ONTO PAVED ROADS WITHIN THE SITE. 11. PERMITTEES MUST USE STREET SWEEPING IF VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENTSEDIMENT TRACKING ONTO THE STREET. 12. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 14. 13. IN ANY AREAS OF THE SITE WHERE FINAL VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION WILL OCCUR, PERMITTEES MUSTRESTRICT VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT USE TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION. 14. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE TOPSOIL ON THE SITE, UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 15. PERMITTEES MUST DIRECT DISCHARGES FROM BMPS TO VEGETATED AREAS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 16. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER OR, IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE ON THE SITE,PROVIDE REDUNDANT (DOUBLE) PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS WHEN A SURFACE WATER IS LOCATEDWITHIN 50 FEET OF THE PROJECT'S EARTH DISTURBANCES AND STORMWATER FLOWS TO THE SURFACEWATER. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT LEAST 5 FEET APART UNLESSLIMITED BY LACK OF AVAILABLE SPACE. NATURAL BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIRED ADJACENT TO ROAD DITCHES,JUDICIAL DITCHES, COUNTY DITCHES, STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS, STORM DRAIN INLETS, ANDSEDIMENT BASINS. IF PRESERVING THE BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE, PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE REASONSIN THE SWPPP. SHEET PILING IS A REDUNDANT PERIMETER CONTROL IF INSTALLED IN A MANNER THAT RETAINSALL STORMWATER. 17. PERMITTEES MUST USE POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, OR OTHER SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS INACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES, DOSING SPECIFICATIONS AND SEDIMENT REMOVALDESIGN SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER. THE PERMITTEES MUST USECONVENTIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TO CHEMICAL ADDITION AND MUST DIRECTTREATED STORMWATER TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM FOR FILTRATION OR SETTLEMENT OF THE FLOCPRIOR TO DISCHARGE.DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (SECTION 10):1.PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE TURBID OR SEDIMENT-LADEN WATERS RELATED TO DEWATERING OR BASINDRAINING (E.G., PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE) TO A TEMPORARY ORPERMANENT SEDIMENT BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MAY DEWATER TOSURFACE WATERS IF THEY VISUALLY CHECK TO ENSURE ADEQUATE TREATMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED ANDNUISANCE CONDITIONS (SEE MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) WILL NOT RESULT FROM THE DISCHARGE. IFPERMITTEES CANNOT DISCHARGE THE WATER TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING A SURFACEWATER, PERMITTEES MUST TREAT IT WITH APPROPRIATE BMPS SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOTADVERSELY AFFECT THE SURFACE WATER OR DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES.2.IF PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE WATER CONTAINING OIL OR GREASE, THEY MUST USE AN OIL-WATERSEPARATOR OR SUITABLE FILTRATION DEVICE (E.G., CARTRIDGE FILTERS, ABSORBENTS PADS) PRIOR TODISCHARGE.3.PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING OR BASIN-DRAINING ACTIVITIES IN A MANNERTHAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION OR SCOUR IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS ORINUNDATION OF WETLANDS IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS THAT CAUSES SIGNIFICANTADVERSE IMPACT TO THE WETLAND.4.IF PERMITTEES USE FILTERS WITH BACKWASH WATER, THEY MUST HAUL THE BACKWASH WATER AWAY FORDISPOSAL, RETURN THE BACKWASH WATER TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, ORINCORPORATE THE BACKWASH WATER INTO THE SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION.INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (SECTION 11):1.PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE A TRAINED PERSON, AS IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 21.2.B, WILL INSPECT THE ENTIRECONSTRUCTION SITE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 1/2 INCH IN 24 HOURS.2.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT AND MAINTAIN ALL PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT BMPS.3.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS AND POLLUTIONPREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE INTEGRITY AND EFFECTIVENESS. PERMITTEES MUSTREPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS WITH FUNCTIONAL BMPS BY THE END OF THENEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY UNLESS ANOTHER TIME FRAME IS SPECIFIED IN ITEM 11.5 OR 11.6.PERMITTEES MAY TAKE ADDITIONAL TIME IF FIELD CONDITIONS PREVENT ACCESS TO THE AREA.4.DURING EACH INSPECTION, PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE DITCHESAND CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS BUT NOT CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, FOR EVIDENCE OF EROSION ANDSEDIMENT DEPOSITION. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACEWATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND RESTABILIZE THEAREAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED SOIL. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE REMOVAL ANDSTABILIZATION WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL,REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. PERMITTEES MUST USE ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS TOOBTAIN ACCESS. IF PRECLUDED, REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OFOBTAINING ACCESS. PERMITTEES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE ANDFEDERAL AUTHORITIES AND RECEIVING ANY APPLICABLE PERMITS, PRIOR TO CONDUCTING ANY WORK INSURFACE WATERS.5.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS, STREETS AND CURB AND GUTTERSYSTEMS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT FOR SEDIMENTATION FROM EROSION OR TRACKEDSEDIMENT FROM VEHICLES. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM ALL PAVED SURFACES WITHIN ONE(1) CALENDAR DAY OF DISCOVERY OR, IF APPLICABLE, WITHIN A SHORTER TIME TO AVOID A SAFETY HAZARD TOUSERS OF PUBLIC STREETS.6.PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES WHEN THEYBECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE.7.PERMITTEES MUST DRAIN TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS AND REMOVE THE SEDIMENTWHEN THE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE BASIN REACHES 1/2 THE STORAGE VOLUME.8.PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE THAT AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL PRESENT ON THE SITE (OR AVAILABLE TO THEPROJECT SITE IN THREE (3) CALENDAR DAYS) IS TRAINED IN THE JOB DUTIES DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.B.9.PERMITTEES MAY ADJUST THE INSPECTION SCHEDULE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 11.2 AS FOLLOWS:a. INSPECTIONS OF AREAS WITH PERMANENT COVER CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH, EVEN IFCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUES ON OTHER PORTIONS OF THE SITE; ORb.WHERE SITES HAVE PERMANENT COVER ON ALL EXPOSED SOIL AND NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ISOCCURRING ANYWHERE ON THE SITE, INSPECTIONS CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH AND, AFTER 12MONTHS, MAY BE SUSPENDED COMPLETELY UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY RESUMES. THE MPCA MAYREQUIRE INSPECTIONS TO RESUME IF CONDITIONS WARRANT; ORc.WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS,INSPECTIONS MAY BE SUSPENDED. INSPECTIONS MUST RESUME WITHIN 24 HOURS OF RUNOFF OCCURRING,OR UPON RESUMING CONSTRUCTION, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. 10. PERMITTEES MUST RECORD ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BEINGCONDUCTED AND THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP. THESE RECORDS MUST INCLUDE:a.DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS; ANDb.NAME OF PERSONS CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS; ANDc.ACCURATE FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING THE SPECIFIC LOCATION WHERE CORRECTIVE ACTIONSARE NEEDED; ANDd.CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCEACTIVITIES); ANDe.DATE OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 1/2 INCHES IN 24 HOURS, AND THE AMOUNT OF RAINFALLFOR EACH EVENT. PERMITTEES MUST OBTAIN RAINFALL AMOUNTS BY EITHER A PROPERLY MAINTAINEDRAIN GAUGE INSTALLED ONSITE, A WEATHER STATION THAT IS WITHIN ONE (1) MILE OF YOUR LOCATION, ORA WEATHER REPORTING SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES SITE SPECIFIC RAINFALL DATA FROM RADAR SUMMARIES;ANDf.IF PERMITTEES OBSERVE A DISCHARGE DURING THE INSPECTION, THEY MUST RECORD AND SHOULDPHOTOGRAPH AND DESCRIBE THE LOCATION OF THE DISCHARGE (I.E., COLOR, ODOR, SETTLED ORSUSPENDED SOLIDS, OIL SHEEN, AND OTHER OBVIOUS INDICATORS OF POLLUTANTS); ANDg.ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP PROPOSED AS A RESULT OF THE INSPECTION MUST BE DOCUMENTED ASREQUIRED IN SECTION 6 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS.POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT (SECTION 12):1.PERMITTEES MUST PLACE BUILDING PRODUCTS AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTICSHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TOMINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. PERMITTEES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO COVER OR PROTECT PRODUCTSWHICH ARE EITHER NOT A SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION TO STORMWATER OR ARE DESIGNED TO BE EXPOSEDTO STORMWATER.2.PERMITTEES MUST PLACE PESTICIDES, FERTILIZERS AND TREATMENT CHEMICALS UNDER COVER (E.G.,PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNEDTO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER.3.PERMITTEES MUST STORE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE, (INCLUDING OIL, DIESEL FUEL,GASOLINE, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINT SOLVENTS, PETROLEUM-BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES,ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS) IN SEALED CONTAINERS TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHERDISCHARGE. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MATERIALS MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN.R. CH. 7045 INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AS APPLICABLE.4.PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY STORE, COLLECT AND DISPOSE SOLID WASTE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH.7035.5.PERMITTEES MUST POSITION PORTABLE TOILETS SO THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT TIP OR BE KNOCKEDOVER. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE SANITARY WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7041.6.PERMITTEES MUST TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF SPILLED OR LEAKEDCHEMICALS, INCLUDING FUEL, FROM ANY AREA WHERE CHEMICALS OR FUEL WILL BE LOADED OR UNLOADEDINCLUDING THE USE OF DRIP PANS OR ABSORBENTS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MUST ENSUREADEQUATE SUPPLIES ARE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES TO CLEAN UP DISCHARGED MATERIALS AND THAT ANAPPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD IS AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS. PERMITTEES MUSTREPORT AND CLEAN UP SPILLS IMMEDIATELY AS REQUIRED BY MINN. STAT. 115.061, USING DRY CLEAN UPMEASURES WHERE POSSIBLE.7.PERMITTEES MUST LIMIT VEHICLE EXTERIOR WASHING AND EQUIPMENT TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE.PERMITTEES MUST CONTAIN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA IN A SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER SIMILARLYEFFECTIVE CONTROLS AND MUST DISPOSE WASTE FROM THE WASHING ACTIVITY PROPERLY. PERMITTEESMUST PROPERLY USE AND STORE SOAPS, DETERGENTS, OR SOLVENTS.8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONTAINMENT FOR ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BYWASHOUT OPERATIONS (E.G., CONCRETE, STUCCO, PAINT, FORM RELEASE OILS, CURING COMPOUNDS ANDOTHER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PERMITTEES MUST PREVENTLIQUID AND SOLID WASHOUT WASTES FROM CONTACTING THE GROUND AND MUST DESIGN THE CONTAINMENTSO IT DOES NOT RESULT IN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. PERMITTEES MUSTPROPERLY DISPOSE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA RULES. PERMITTEES MUSTINSTALL A SIGN INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE WASHOUT FACILITY.PERMIT TERMINATION (SECTION 4 AND SECTION 13):1.PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ALL TERMINATION CONDITIONS LISTED IN SECTION 13ARE COMPLETE.2.PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER SELLING OR OTHERWISE LEGALLY TRANSFERRINGTHE ENTIRE SITE, INCLUDING PERMIT RESPONSIBILITY FOR ROADS (E.G., STREET SWEEPING) ANDSTORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE FINAL CLEAN OUT, OR TRANSFERRING PORTIONS OF A SITE TO ANOTHERPARTY. THE PERMITTEES' COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT TERMINATES AT MIDNIGHT ON THE SUBMISSIONDATE OF THE NOT.3.PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND MUST INSTALL PERMANENT COVER OVER ALLAREAS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. VEGETATIVE COVER MUST CONSIST OF A UNIFORM PERENNIALVEGETATION WITH A DENSITY OF 70 PERCENT OF ITS EXPECTED FINAL GROWTH. VEGETATION IS NOTREQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF A SPECIFIC AREA DICTATES NO VEGETATION, SUCH AS IMPERVIOUSSURFACES OR THE BASE OF A SAND FILTER.4.PERMITTEES MUST CLEAN THE PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM OF ANY ACCUMULATEDSEDIMENT AND MUST ENSURE THE SYSTEM MEETS ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 15 THROUGH19 AND IS OPERATING AS DESIGNED.5.PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT.6.PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLBMPS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. PERMITTEES MAY LEAVE BMPS DESIGNED TO DECOMPOSE ON-SITE INPLACE.7.FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ONLY, PERMIT COVERAGE TERMINATES ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS IF THESTRUCTURES ARE FINISHED AND TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION AND DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETERCONTROL IS COMPLETE, THE RESIDENCE SELLS TO THE HOMEOWNER, AND THE PERMITTEE DISTRIBUTES THEMPCA'S "HOMEOWNER FACT SHEET" TO THE HOMEOWNER.8.FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ON AGRICULTURAL LAND (E.G., PIPELINES ACROSS CROPLAND), PERMITTEESMUST RETURN THE DISTURBED LAND TO ITS PRECONSTRUCTION AGRICULTURAL USE PRIOR TO SUBMITTINGTHE NOT.SEED NOTES:ALL SEED MIXES AND APPLICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL.GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS:THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SALVAGE AND PRESERVE EXISTING TOPSOIL NECESSARY FOR FINALSTABILIZATION AND TO ALSO MINIMIZE COMPACTION IN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. IMMEDIATELY BEFORE SEEDINGTHE SOIL SHALL BE TILLED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 INCHES.TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING, MULCHING & BLANKET.SEED·TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 (WINTER WHEAT COVER CROP) FOR WINTER AND 21-111(OATS COVER CROP) FOR SPRING/SUMMER APPLICATIONS. BOTH SEED MIXES SHALL BE APPLIED AT A SEEDINGRATE OF 100 LBS/ACRE.MULCH·IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING, WITHIN 24 HOURS, MNDOT TYPE 1 MULCH SHOULD BE APPLIED TO PROTECTAND ENHANCE SEED GERMINATION. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT 90% COVERAGE (2 TONS PER ACRE OFSTRAW MULCH)SLOPES·3:1 (HORIZ/VERT.) OR FLATTER MUCH SHALL BE COVERED WITH MULCH·SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR DITCH BOTTOMS SHALL BE COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET.·SEE PLAN FOR MORE DETAILED DITCH AND STEEP SLOPE EROSION CONTROL TREATMENTS.REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONLIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LLC168 PIONEER TRAIL, NO. 129CHASKA, MN, 55318DEENA LAUGEN612-643-1703DEENA@EDENSPRINGSMN.COMPROJECT NARRATIVE:PROJECT IS A DEVELOPMENT OF AN OPEN PARCEL INTO A SENIOR LIVING FACILITIY. SITE, GRADING, UTILITY ANDLANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WILL OCCUR.NATIVE BUFFER NARRATIVE:PRESERVING A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER AROUND WATER BODIES IS PROVIDED IN THESEPLANS.INFILTRATION NARRATIVE:INFILTRATION IS NOT PROVIDED AS PART OF THE PROJECTS PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMDUE TO SITE CONSTRAINTS.SOIL CONTAMINATION NARRATIVE:SOILS ONSITE HAVE NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED AS CONTAMINATED.SPECIAL TMDL BMP REQUIREMENTS SITE SPECIFIC (IF REQUIRED):THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN ONE MILE AND DISCHARGES TO RILEY CREEK - RILEY CREEK IS IDENTIFIED AS ANIMPAIRED WATER BODY PER THE MPCA'S 303(D) IMPAIRED WATERS LIST. RILEY CREEK IS IMPAIRED FORNUTRIENT EUTROPHICATION BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS. BECAUSE THIS WATER BODY IS LOCATED WITHIN ONEMILE OF THE SITE, BMPS AS DEFINED IN THE NPDES PERMIT ITEMS 23.9 AND 23.10 APPLY. THESE ARE ASFOLLOWS:1.DURING CONSTRUCTION:A.STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSIONBUT IN NO CASE COMPLETED LATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THATPORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED.B.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 14. MUST BE USED FORCOMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS THAT SERVE AN AREA WITH FIVE (5) OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONETIME.PERMANENT STABILIZATION NOTES SITE SPECIFIC:PERMANENT SEED MIX·FOR THIS PROJECT ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT TO BE SODDED OR LANDSCAPED SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVEPERMANENT SEED MIX.··AREAS IN BUFFERS AND ADJACENT TO OR IN WET AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 (STORMWATERSOUTH AND WEST) AT 35 LBS PER ACRE.··DRY AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 35-221 (DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL) AT 40 LBS PER ACRE.·MAINTENANCE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL.COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION08/13/25CITY SUBMITTAL09/09/25CITY RESUBMITTALPROJECT MANAGERPATRICK SARVERCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 X 702DRAWN BYAM, ZH, WBREVIEWED BYRB,PSPROJECT NUMBER25102EDEN SPRINGS CHANHASSAN, MN LIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LCC 168 PIONEER TRAIL NOX 129, CHASKA, MN 5531858960ANDERS S. MELBYLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.09/09/25Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNER DESIGN ENGINEER: DAVID J. KNAEBLE P.E.TRAINING COURSE: DESIGN OF SWPPPTRAINING ENTITY: UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAINSTRUCTOR: JOHN CHAPMANDATES OF TRAINING COURSE: 8/22/2012- 8/23/2012TOTAL TRAINING HOURS: 12DATE OF RECERTIFICATION: 1/3/2025EXPIRATION: 5/31/2028355 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION08/13/25CITY SUBMITTAL09/09/25CITY RESUBMITTALPROJECT MANAGERPATRICK SARVERCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 X 702DRAWN BYAM, ZH, WBREVIEWED BYRB,PSPROJECT NUMBER25102EDEN SPRINGS CHANHASSAN, MN LIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LCC 168 PIONEER TRAIL NOX 129, CHASKA, MN 5531858960ANDERS S. MELBYLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.09/09/25Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERSW1.4SWPPP - ATTACHMENTSATTACHMENT A: SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENTSOILS INFORMATIONGENERAL SITE INFORMATION (5.1)1. DESCRIBE THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S). INCLUDE THE TIMING FOR INSTALLATION AND PROCEDURES USED TO ESTABLISH ADDITIONALTEMPORARY BMP'S AS NECESSARY. (5.5)THE PROJECT IS PROTECTED BY TWO (W) MAIN BMP'S, SILT FENCE AND INLET PROTECTION DEVICES. THE SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE AND MONITORED AS NECESSARY. INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WILL BEINSTALLED IN ALL CATCH BASINS ON THE SITE AND ANY OFF SITE THAT WILL RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THIS SITE. AS THE PROJECT PROGRESSES ADDITIONAL BMP'S SUCH AS EROSION CONTROL BLANKET MAY BE UTILIZED.2. ATTACH TO THIS SWPPP A TABLE WITH THE ANTICIPATED QUANTITIES FOR THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT FOR ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S (5.7).SEE PAGE SW1.33. ATTACH TO THIS SWPPP A SITE MAP THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING FEATURES (5.9):EXIST AND FINAL GRADES, INCLUDING DIVIDING LINES AND DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR ALL PRE AND POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER RUNOFF DRAINAGE AREAS LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS.LOCATIONS OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES AND SOIL TYPES.·EXISTING AND FINAL GRADES, INCLUDING DIVIDING LINES AND DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR ALL PRE AND POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER RUNOFF DRAINAGE AREAS LOCATED WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS.·LOCATIONS OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED.·LOCATION OF AREAS OF PHASED CONSTRUCTION.·ALL SURFACE WATERS AND EXISTING WETLANDS WITHIN ONE MILE FROM THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES THAT WILL RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE SITE (IDENTIFIABLE ON MAPS SUCH AS USGS 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE MAPS OR EQUIVALENT.WHERE SURFACE WATERS RECEIVING RUNOFF ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WILL NOT FIT ON THE PLAN SHEET, THEY MUST BE IDENTIFIED WITH AN ARROW, INDICATING BOTH DIRECTION AND DISTANCE TO THE SURFACE WATER.·METHODS TO BE USED FOR FINAL STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREA4. WERE STORMWATER MITIGATION MEASURES REQUIRED AS THE RESULT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, OR OTHER REQUIRED LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL REVIEW OF THE PROJECT?NOIF YES, DESCRIBE HOW THESE MEASURES WERE ADDRESSED IN THE SWPPP. (5.16)N/A5. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED IN A KARST AREA SUCH THAT ADDITIONAL MEASURES WOULD BE NECESSARY TO PROJECT DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREAS AS DESCRIBED IN MINN. R. CHAPTERS 7050 AND 7060? NOIF YES, DESCRIBE THE ADDITIONAL MEASURES TO BE USED. (SECTION 23)N/A6. DOES THE SITE DISCHARGE TO A CALCEREOUS FEN LISTED IN MINN. R. 7050.0180, SUBP. 6.B?NOIF YES, A LETTER OF APPROVAL FROM THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO APPLICATION FOR THIS PERMIT.7. DOES THE SITE DISCHARGE TO A WATER THAT IS LISTED AS IMPAIRED FOR THE FOLLOWING POLLUTANT(S) OR STRESSOR(S): PHOSPHORUS, TURBIDITY, DISSOLVED OXYGEN OR BIOTIC IMPAIRMENT? USE THE SPECIAL AND IMPAIRED WATERS SEARCH TOOL AT:WWW.PCA.STATE.MN.US/WATER/STORMWATER/STORMWATER-C.HTMLNOIF NO, SKIP TO TRAININGDOES THE IMPAIRED WATER HAVE AN APPROVED TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS (TMDL) WITH AN APPROVED WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY?N/AIF YES:A. LIST THE RECEIVING WATER, THE AREAS OF THE SITE DISCHARGING TO IT, AND THE POLLUTANT(S) IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL.B. LIST THE BMP'S AND ANY OTHER SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER RELATED IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL.IF THE SITE HAS A DISCHARGE POINT WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE IMPAIRED WATER AND THE WATER FLOWS TO THE IMPAIRED WATER BUT NO SPECIFIC BMPS FOR CONSTRUCTION ARE IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL, THE ADDITIONAL BMPS IN SECTION 23 MUST BE ADDEDTO THE SWPPP AND IMPLEMENTED (15.19). THE ADDITIONAL BMPS ONLY APPLY TO THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT THAT DRAIN TO ONE OF THE IDENTIFIED DISCHARGE POINTS.N/A8. IDENTIFY ADJACENT PUBLIC WATERS WHERE THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) HAS DECLARED “WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS” DURING FISH SPAWNING TIMEFRAMESN/ASELECTION OF A PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SECTION 15)1. WILL THE PROJECT CREATE A NEW CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO ONE ACRE?YESIF YES, A WATER QUALITY VOLUME OF ONE INCH OF RUNOFF FROM THE CUMULATIVE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE (SEE 16.7 OF THE PERMIT) THROUGH INFILTRATION UNLESS PROHIBITED DUE TO ONE OF THE REASONS IN ITEMS 16.4THROUGH 16.21. IF INFILTRATION IS PROHIBITED IDENTIFY OTHER METHOD OF MEETING WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS (E.G., FILTRATION SYSTEM, WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN, REGIONAL PONDING OR EQUIVALENT METHOD2. DESCRIBE WHICH METHOD WILL BE USED TO TREAT RUNOFF FROM THE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CREATED BY THE PROJECT:INCLUDE ALL CALCULATIONS AND DESIGN INFORMATION FOR THE METHOD SELECTED. SEE SECTION 23 OF THE PERMIT FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH EACH METHOD.FILTRATIONCALCULATIONS ARE WITHIN THE SITE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT AND PART OF THIS SWPPP AS ATTACHMENT D.3. IF IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO MEET THE TREATMENT REQUIREMENT FOR THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME, DESCRIBE WHY. THIS CAN INCLUDE PROXIMITY TO BEDROCK OR ROAD PROJECTS WHERE THE LACK OF RIGHT OF WAY PRECLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF ANYPERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. DESCRIBE WHAT OTHER TREATMENT, SUCH AS GRASS SWALES, SMALLER PONDS, OR GRIT CHAMBERS, WILL BE IMPLEMENTED TO TREAT RUNOFF PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS. (15.8)IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO MEET REQUIREMENT FOR WATER QUALITY VOLUME.4. FOR PROJECTS THAT DISCHARGE TO TROUT STREAMS, INCLUDING TRIBUTARIES TO TROUT STREAMS, IDENTIFY METHOD OF INCORPORATING TEMPERATURE CONTROLS INTO THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.N/AEROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES (SECTION 8.1)DESCRIBE THE TYPES OF TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION BMP'S EXPECTED TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON THIS SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION:1. DESCRIBE CONSTRUCTION PHASING, VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES TO MINIMIZE EROSION. DELINEATE AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED (E.G.,WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE, ETC.) BEFORE WORK BEGINS.SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE.2. DESCRIBE METHODS OF TEMPORARILY STABILIZING SOILS AND SOIL STOCKPILES (E.G., MULCHES, HYDRAULIC TACKIFIERS, EROSION BLANKETS, ETC.):TEMPORARY EROSION PROTECTION WILL BE SEED AND MULCH AND EROSION BLANKETS WHERE REQUIRED, WITH PERMANENT COVER BEING EITHER SOD OR LANDSCAPE FEATURES.3. DESCRIBE METHODS OF DISSIPATING VELOCITY ALONG STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS AND AT CHANNEL OUTLETS (E.G., CHECK DAMS, SEDIMENT TRAPS, RIP RAP, ETC.):SOD WILL BE UTILIZED ALONG CHANNELS AND RIP RAP AT CHANNEL.4. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR STABILIZATION OF DITCH AND SWALE WETTED PERIMETERS (NOTE THAT MULCH, HYDRAULIC SOIL TACKIFIERS, HYDROMULCHES, ETC. ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE SOILSTABILIZATION METHODS FOR ANY PART OF A DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE)FINAL STABILIZATION OF SWALES WILL BE SOD5. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR ENERGY DISSIPATION AT PIPE OUTLETS (E.G., RIP RAP, SPLASH PADS, GABIONS, ETC.)RIP RAP WILL BE UTILIZED AT PIPE OUTLETS6. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO PROMOTE INFILTRATION AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL ON THE SITE PRIOR TO OFFSITE DISCHARGE, UNLESS INFEASIBLE (E.G., DIRECT STORMWATER FLOW TO VEGETATED AREAS):EXISTING SOILS ARE NON-CONDUCIVE TO INFILTRATION. NOT PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT.7. FOR DRAINAGE OR DIVERSION DITCHES, DESCRIBE PRACTICES TO STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET OF THE PROPERTY EDGE OR POINT OF DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATER.THE LAST 200 LINEAL FEET MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO SURFACE WATERS AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASEDFOR ALL DISCHARGES TO SPECIAL, IMPAIRED OR “WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS”. ALL OTHER REMAINING PORTIONS OF THE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTERCONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER, PROPERTY EDGE AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT AREA HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED.N/A, NO DITCHES ON SITE8. DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL EROSION PREVENTION MEASURES THAT WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION (E.G., CONSTRUCTION PHASING, MINIMIZING SOIL DISTURBANCE, VEGETATIVE BUFFERS,HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, SLOPE DRAINING/TERRACING, ETC.):OTHER EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO; MINIMIZING SITE EXPOSURE WHEN POSSIBLE.9. IF APPLICABLE, INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN APPENDIX A PART C.3 REGARDING MAINTAINING A 100-FOOT BUFFER ZONE OR INSTALLING REDUNDANT BMPS FOR PORTIONS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TOSPECIAL WATERS).N/A10. IF APPLICABLE, DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL EROSION PREVENTION BMPS TO BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE TO PROTECT PLANNED FILTRATION AREASMINIMIZE SITE EXPOSURE IN AREAS ADJACENT TO FILTRATION AREAS.SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES (SECTION 9.1)DESCRIBE THE METHODS OF SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO BE IMPLEMENTED AT THIS SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT IMPACTS TO SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS1. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROL:SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE SITE2. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SOIL STOCKPILES:SEED AND MULCH AS WELL AS EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS WILL BE UTILIZED AS NECESSARY3. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION:SEE INLET PROTECTION DETAILS4. DESCRIBE METHODS TO MINIMIZE VEHICLE TRACKING AT CONSTRUCTION EXITS AND STREET SWEEPING ACTIVITIES:THE PROJECT WILL UTILIZE A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.5. DESCRIBE METHODS, IF APPLICABLE, ADDITIONAL SEDIMENT CONTROLS (E.G., DIVERSION BERMS) TO BE INSTALLED TO KEEP RUNOFF AWAY FROM PLANNED INFILTRATION AREAS WHEN EXCAVATED PRIOR TO FINALSTABILIZATION OF THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA:SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER GRADING TO PROTECT FILTRATION AREAS.6. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION AND PRESERVE TOP SOIL (UNLESS INFEASIBLE) AT THIS SITE:LIGHT TRACKED EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED, TOPSOIL WILL BE STRIPPED AND STOCKPILED7. DESCRIBE PLANS TO PRESERVE A 50-FOOT NATURAL BUFFER BETWEEN THE PROJECT'S SOIL DISTURBANCE AND A SURFACE WATER OR PLANS FOR REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE:DOUBLE ROW OF SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG WETLAND. PROJECT WILL NOT DISTURB WITHIN 20 FEET OF WETLAND.8. DESCRIBE PLANS FOR USE OF SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS (E.G., POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, ETC.) SEE PART 9.18 OF THE PERMIT:N/A9. IS THE PROJECT REQUIRED TO INSTALL A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN DUE TO 10 OR MORE ACRES DRAINING TO A COMMON LOCATION OR 5 ACRES OR MORE IF THE SITE IS WITHIN 1 MILE OF A SPECIAL ORIMPAIRED WATER?NOIF YES, DESCRIBE (OR ATTACH PLANS ) SHOWING HOW THE BASIN WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 14.PROPOSED FILTRATION BASINS WILL SERVE AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENTS BASINS THAT WILL THEN BE CONVERTED TO PERMANENT FILTRATIONS BASINS.DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (SECTION 10.1)1. WILL THE PROJECT INCLUDE DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING?NOIF YES, DESCRIBE MEASURES TO BE USED TO TREAT/DISPOSE OF TURBID OR SEDIMENT-LADEN WATER AND METHOD TO PREVENT EROSION OR SCOUR OF DISCHARGE POINTS (SEE 10.2 THROUGH 10.5 OF THEPERMIT):N/A 2. WILL THE PROJECT INCLUDE USE OF FILTERS FOR BACKWASH WATER?NOIF YES, DESCRIBE HOW FILTER BACKWASH WATER WILL BE MANAGED ON THE SITE OR PROPERLY DISPOSED (10.6):N/AADDITIONAL BMP'S FOR SPECIAL WATERS AND DISCHARGES TO WETLANDS (SECTION 23.1)1. SPECIAL WATERS. DOES YOUR PROJECT DISCHARGE TO SPECIAL WATERS?NO2. IF PROXIMITY TO BEDROCK OR ROAD PROJECTS WHERE THE LACK OF RIGHT OF WAY PRECLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF ANY OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, THEN OTHERTREATMENT SUCH AS GRASSED SWALES, SMALLER PONDS, OR GRIT CHAMBERS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS. DESCRIBE WHAT OTHER TREATMENT WILL BE PROVIDED.N/A3. DESCRIBE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS FOR EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITH A CONTINUOUS POSITIVE SLOPE TO A SPECIAL WATERS, AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS FOR AREAS THAT DRAIN FIVEOR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONE TIME.N/A4. DESCRIBE THE UNDISTURBED BUFFER ZONE TO BE USED (NOT LESS THAN 100 LINEAR FEET FROM THE SPECIAL WATER).N/A5. DESCRIBE HOW THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WILL ENSURE THAT THE PRE AND POST PROJECT RUNOFF RATE AND VOLUME FROM THE 1, AND 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATIONEVENTS REMAINS THE SAME.N/A6. DESCRIBE HOW THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WILL MINIMIZE ANY INCREASE IN THE TEMPERATURE OF TROUT STREAM RECEIVING WATERS RESULTING IN THE 1, AND 2-YEAR24-HOUR PRECIPITATION EVENTS.N/A7. WETLANDS. DOES YOUR PROJECT DISCHARGE STORMWATER WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS TO A WETLAND (E.G., CONVERSION OF A NATURAL WETLAND TO A STORMWATERPOND)?NOIF YES, DESCRIBE THE WETLAND MITIGATION SEQUENCE THAT WILL BE FOLLOWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 22 OF THE PERMIT.N/AINSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (SECTION 11.1)DESCRIBE PROCEDURES TO ROUTINELY INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE:·ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND·WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS, AND WITHIN (7) DAYS AFTER THATINSPECTIONS MUST INCLUDE STABILIZED AREAS, EROSION PREVENTION,AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S AND INFILTRATION AREAS.INSPECTOR WILL FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED ABOVE AND FILL OUT "ATTACHMENT B - CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLIST"1. DESCRIBE PRACTICES FOR STORAGE OF BUILDING PRODUCTS WITH A POTENTIAL TO LEACH POLLUTANTS TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE TO STORMWATER:ALL BUILDING PRODUCTS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE2. DESCRIBE PRACTICES FOR STORAGE OF PESTICIDES, HERBICIDES, INSECTICIDES, FERTILIZERS, TREATMENT CHEMICAL, AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS:ALL LANDSCAPE TREATMENT CHEMICALS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZED EXPOSURE3. DESCRIBE PRACTICES FOR STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS OR TOXIC WASTE (E.G., OIL, FUEL, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINT SOLVENTS, PETROLEUM-BASED PRODUCTS, WOODPRESERVATIVE, ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS) ACCORDING TO MINN. R. CH. 7045, INCLUDING RESTRICTED ACCESS AND SECONDARY CONTAINMENT:ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS.4. DESCRIBE COLLECTION, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7035:ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND SOLID WASTER WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS5. DESCRIBE MANAGEMENT OF PORTABLE TOILETS TO PREVENT TIPPING AND DISPOSAL OF SANITARY WASTES IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7040:SANITARY AND SEPTIC SERVICES WILL BE PROVIDED TO WORKERS WITH PORTABLE FACILITIES MAINTAINED AS NEEDED BY THE PROVIDER.6. DESCRIBE SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE FOR FUELING AND EQUIPMENT OR VEHICLE MAINTENANCE:EMPLOYEES WILL BE TRAINED IN TECHNIQUES DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE SPILLS. VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CHECKED FOR LEAKS.7. DESCRIBE CONTAINMENT AND DISPOSAL OF VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT WASH WATER AND PROHIBITING ENGINE DEGREASING ON THE SITE:ALL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES SHALL BE WASHED OFF SITE8. DESCRIBE STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF CONCRETE AND OTHER WASHOUT WASTES SO THAT WASTES DO NOT CONTACT THE GROUND:ALL CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL OCCUR OFF SITE.FINAL STABILIZATION (25.22)1. DESCRIBE METHOD OF FINAL STABILIZATION (PERMANENT COVER) OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS:FINAL STABILIZATION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH PAVEMENT, SOD AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS.2. DESCRIBE METHODS USED TO CLEAN ALL STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS AND STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT (25.22):CLEANING OF STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS SHALL BE DONE BY HAND SUCH AS THE USE OF A SHOVEL.3. DESCRIBE METHODS FOR REMOVING ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S:REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S CAN BE DONE BY HAND AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF.REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONPROJECT LOCATIONADDRESS1620 ARBORETUM BLVDCITY/TOWNSHIPCHANHASSENSTATEMNCOUNTYCARVERZIP CODE55317PROJECT SIZE3.65 ACRESLATTITUDE/LONGITUDE OF APPROX.CENTROID OF PROJECT 44.86424 N, -93.56227 WMETHOD OF LAT/LONG COLLECTIONONLINE TOOLPROJECT TYPERESIDENTIALIMPERVIOUS SURFACES (ACRES)EXISTING0.0PROPOSED1.3DIFFERENCE1.3ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION TIMELINESTART05-31-26END10-31-26CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITYSITE DEVELOPMENTSOIL TYPESSILTY CLAY, SANDY LEAN CLAYMAP UNIT SYMBOLMAP UNIT NAMEKBKILKENNY-LESTER LOAMS,2-6% SLOPESKCLESTER-KILKENNY LOAMS,6-12% SLOPESRECEIVING WATER BODIESWATER BODY IDNAME OF WATER BODYWATER BODY TYPESPECIAL WATER (Y/N)IMPAIRED WATER (Y/N)107020012-511RILEY CREEKCREEKNYSITE LOCATION MAP -356 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N2025ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION08/13/25CITY SUBMITTAL09/09/25CITY RESUBMITTALPROJECT MANAGERPATRICK SARVERCONTACT NUMBER612-615-0060 X 702DRAWN BYAM, ZH, WBREVIEWED BYRB,PSPROJECT NUMBER25102EDEN SPRINGS CHANHASSAN, MN LIGHTHOUSE HOMES, LCC 168 PIONEER TRAIL NOX 129, CHASKA, MN 5531858960ANDERS S. MELBYLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.09/09/25Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° LandscapeArchitecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060OWNERSW1.5SWPPP - ATTACHMENTSATTACHMENT C - COMBINEDFACILITY MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE1.ALL STORMWATER RETENTION, DETENTION AND TREATMENT BASINS MUST BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE A YEAR TO DETERMINETHAT BASIN RETENTION AND TREATMENT CHARACTERISTICS ARE ADEQUATE. A STORAGE TREATMENT BASIN WILL BECONSIDERED INADEQUATE IF SEDIMENT HAS DECREASED THE WET STORAGE VOLUME BY 50 PERCENT OR DRY STORAGE VOLUMEBY 25 PERCENT OF ITS ORIGINAL DESIGN VOLUME. BASED ON THIS INSPECTION, IF A STORMWATER BASIN REQUIRES SEDIMENTCLEANOUT, THE BASIN WILL BE RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL DESIGN CONTOURS AND VEGETATED STATE WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THEINSPECTION DATE.2.ALL GRIT CHAMBERS, SUMP CATCH BASINS, SUMP MANHOLES, OUTLET STRUCTURES, CULVERTS, OUTFALL STRUCTURES ANDOTHER STORMWATER FACILITIES FOR WHICH MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED HEREIN MUST BEINSPECTED IN THE SPRING, SUMMER AND FALL OF EACH YEAR. WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE INSPECTION DATE, ALL ACCUMULATEDSEDIMENT AND DEBRIS MUST BE REMOVED SUCH THAT EACH STORMWATER FACILITY OPERATES AS DESIGNED AND PERMITTED.CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS MUST BE KEPT CLEAR OF LITTER AND VEGETATIVE DEBRIS, INFLOW PIPES AND OVERFLOWSPILLWAYS KEPT CLEAR, INLET AREAS KEPT CLEAN, AND UNDESIRABLE VEGETATION REMOVED. EROSION IMPAIRING THE FUNCTIONOR INTEGRITY OF THE FACILITIES, IF ANY, WILL BE CORRECTED, AND ANY STRUCTURAL DAMAGE IMPAIRING OR THREATENING TOIMPAIR THE FUNCTION OF THE FACILITIES MUST BE REPAIRED.3.VOLUME CONTROL FACILITIES AND CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS MUST BE INSPECTED EVERY THREE MONTHS DURING THEOPERATIONAL PERIOD (BETWEEN SPRING SNOWMELT AND FIRST SUBSTANTIAL SNOWFALL) AND MONITORED AFTER RAINFALLEVENTS OF 1 INCH OR MORE TO ENSURE THAT THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS CLEAR OF LITTER AND DEBRIS, INFLOWPIPES AND OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS ARE CLEAR, INLET AREAS ARE CLEAN, UNDESIRABLE VEGETATION IS REMOVED AND THERE IS NOEROSION IMPAIRING OR THREATENING TO IMPAIR THE FUNCTION OF A FACILITY. IF SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATED IN AINFILTRATION FEATURE, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF INSPECTION DEPOSITED SEDIMENTS MUST BE REMOVED, THE INFILTRATION CAPACITYOF THE UNDERLYING SOILS MUST BE RESTORED, AND ANY SURFACE DISTURBANCE MUST BE STABILIZED. INSPECTION MUSTENSURE THAT SEDIMENT TRAPS AND FOREBAYS ARE TRAPPING SEDIMENT AND THAT MORE THAN 50 PERCENT OF THE STORAGEVOLUME REMAINS, THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS STABLE (I.E., NO EROSION IS OBSERVED), AND INLETS ANDOUTLET/OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS ARE IN GOOD CONDITIONS WITH NO EROSION. MAINTENANCE TECHNIQUES USED MUST PROTECTTHE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE PRACTICE BY LIMITING SOIL COMPACTION TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE (E.G., BYUSING LOW-IMPACT EARTH-MOVING EQUIPMENT).4.UNDERGROUND STORAGE CHAMBERS MUST BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE A YEAR TO ENSURE THAT ADEQUATE STORAGECAPACITY REMAINS. CAPACITY WILL BE CONSIDERED INADEQUATE IF SEDIMENT HAS DECREASED THE STORAGE VOLUME BY 50PERCENT OF ITS ORIGINAL DESIGN VOLUME. ACCUMULATED DEBRIS AND SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED, AND INLET AND OUTLETSTRUCTURES WILL BE CLEARED OF ANY FLOW IMPEDIMENTS.ATTACHMENT B: SWPPP INSPECTION FORMATTACHMENT C: MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMNOTE: THIS INSPECTION REPORT DOES NOT ADDRESS ALL ASPECTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (NPDES/SDS)CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT (PERMIT) ISSUED ON AUGUST 1, 2018. THE COMPLETION OF THIS CHECKLIST DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AREIN COMPLIANCE; IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE(S) TO READ AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.FACILITY INFORMATIONSITE NAME: SITE ADDRESS: PERMIT NUMBER:CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE:INSPECTION INFORMATIONINSPECTOR NAME: _______________________ PHONE NUMBER: _________________________ORGANIZATION/COMPANY MAN: _____________________________________________________DATE (MM/DD/YYYY): _____________________TIME: ____________ AM / PMIS THE INSPECTOR CERTIFIED IN SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL AND IS IT DOCUMENTED IN THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)?IS THIS INSPECTION ROUTINE OR IN RESPONSE TO A STORM EVENT:RAINFALL AMOUNT (IF APPLICABLE): ____________IS SITE WITHIN ONE AERIAL MILE OF SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER THAT CAN POTENTIALLY RECEIVE DISCHARGE FROM THE SITE?IF YES, FOLLOW SECTION 23 AND OTHER APPLICABLE PERMIT REQUIREMENTSNOTE: IF N/A IS SELECTED AT ANY TIME, SPECIFY WHY IN THE COMMENT AREA FOR THAT SECTION.EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENT (SECTION 8.1)1.ARE SOILS STABILIZED WHERE NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS OCCURRED FOR 14 DAYS (INCLUDING STOCKPILES)?(7 DAYS WHERE APPLICABLE, OR 24 HOURS DURING MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES [DNR] FISHSPAWNING RESTRICTIONS)2.HAS THE NEED TO DISTURB STEEP SLOPES BEEN MINIMIZED?3.IF STEEP SLOPES ARE DISTURBED, ARE STABILIZATION PRACTICES DESIGNED FOR STEEP SLOPES USED?4.ALL DITCHES/SWALES STABILIZED 200' BACK FROM POINT OF DISCHARGE OR PROPERTY EDGE WITHIN 24 HOURS? (MULCH,HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, OR SIMILAR BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES [BMPS] ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE IN DITCHES/SWALESIF THE SLOPE IS GREATER THAN 2%)ARE APPROPRIATE BMP'S INSTALLED PROTECTING INLETS/OUTLETS?5.DO PIPE OUTLETS HAVE ENERGY DISSIPATION (WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTION)?6.IS CONSTRUCTION PHASING BEING FOLLOWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SWPPP?7.ARE AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MARKED OFF (FLAGS, SIGNS, ETC.)?COMMENTS:SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS (SECTION 9.1)1.ARE PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS INSTALLED PROPERLY ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS?2.ARE APPROPRIATE BMPS INSTALLED PROTECTING INLETS, CATCH BASINS, AND CULVERT INLETS?3.IS A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER PRESERVED AROUND ALL SURFACE WATERS DURING CONSTRUCTION?3.1.IF NO, HAVE REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS BEEN INSTALLED?4.DO ALL ERODIBLE STOCKPILES HAVE PERIMETER CONTROL IN PLACE?5.IS THERE A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN ON SITE, AND IS IT BUILT AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 14 OF THE PERMIT?6.IS SOIL COMPACTION BEING MINIMIZED WHERE NOT DESIGNED FOR COMPACTION?7.IS TOPSOIL BEING PRESERVED UNLESS INFEASIBLE?8.IF CHEMICAL FLOCCULANTS ARE USED, IS THERE A CHEMICAL FLOCCULANT PLAN IN PLACE?COMMENTS:DISCLOSURES:·AFTER DISCOVERY, THE PERMIT REQUIRES MANY OF THE DEFICIENCIES THAT MAY BE FOUND ON SITE BE CORRECTED WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD OF TIME. SEE PERMIT FORMORE DETAILS.·THE PERMITTEE(S) IS/ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BMPS AS WELL ASEROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS UNTIL ANOTHER PERMITTEE HAS OBTAINED COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT ACCORDING TO SECTION 3, OR THEPROJECT HAS MET THE TERMINATION CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT AND A NOTICE OF TERMINATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY.Y N N/AY N N/A7 DAY RAINY NMAINTENANCE AND INSPECTIONS (SECTION 11)1.ARE ALL PREVIOUSLY STABILIZED AREAS MAINTAINING GROUND COVER?2.ARE PERIMETER CONTROLS MAINTAINED AND FUNCTIONING PROPERLY, SEDIMENT REMOVED WHEN ONE-HALF FULL?3.ARE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES MAINTAINED AND ADEQUATELY PROTECTING INLETS?4.ARE THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS BEING MAINTAINED AND FUNCTIONING PROPERLY?5.ARE VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS AT SITE EXISTS IN PLACE AND MAINTAINED AND FUNCTIONING PROPERLY?6.IS ALL TRACKED SEDIMENT BEING REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS?7.HAVE ALL SURFACE WATERS, DITCHES, CONVEYANCES, AND DISCHARGE POINTS BEEN INSPECTED?8.WERE ANY DISCHARGES SEEN DURING THIS INSPECTION (I.E., SEDIMENT, TURBID WATER, OR OTHERWISE)?IF YES, RECORD THE LOCATION OF ALL POINTS OF DISCHARGE. PHOTOGRAPH AND DESCRIBE THE DISCHARGE (SIZE, COLOR, ODOR, FOAM, OIL SHEEN, TIME, ETC.).DESCRIBE HOW THE DISCHARGE WILL BE ADDRESSED. WAS THE DISCHARGE A SEDIMENT DELTA? IF YES, WILL THE DELTA BE RECOVERED WITHIN SEVEN DAYS ANDIN ACCORDANCE WITH ITEM 11.5 OF THE PERMIT?COMMENTS:Y N N/APOLLUTION PREVENTION (SECTION 12)1.ARE ALL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS THAT CAN LEACH POLLUTANTS UNDER COVER OR PROTECTED?2.ARE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS BEING PROPERLY STORED?3.ARE APPROPRIATE BMPS BEING USED TO PREVENT DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH FUELING AND MAINTENANCE OFEQUIPMENT OR VEHICLES?4.ARE ALL SOLID WASTES BEING PROPERLY CONTAINED AND DISPOSED OF?5.IS THERE A CONCRETE/OTHER MATERIAL WASHOUT AREA ON SITE AND IS IT BEING USED?6.IS THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA MARKED WITH A SIGN?7.ARE THE CONCRETE/OTHER MATERIAL WASHOUT AREAS PROPERLY MAINTAINED?COMMENTS:Y N N/AOTHER1.IS A COPY OF THE SWPPP, INSPECTION RECORDS, AND TRAINING DOCUMENTATION LOCATED ON THE CONSTRUCTIONSITE, OR CAN IT BE MADE AVAILABLE WITHIN 72 HOURS?2.HAS THE SWPPP BEEN FOLLOWED AND IMPLEMENTED ON SITE, AND AMENDED AS NEEDED?3.IS ANY DEWATERING OCCURRING ON SITE?IF YES, WHAT BMPS ARE BEING USED TO ENSURE THAT CLEAN WATER IS LEAVING THE SITE AND THE DISCHARGE IS NOTCAUSING EROSION OR SCOUR?4.WILL A PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BE CREATED FOR THIS PROJECT IF REQUIRED AND INACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 15 OF THE PERMIT (IF ADDING AN ACRE OR MORE OF NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACE)?IF YES, DESCRIBE:5.IF INFILTRATION/FILTRATION SYSTEMS ARE BEING CONSTRUCTED, ARE THEY MARKED AND PROTECTED FROMCOMPACTION AND SEDIMENTATION?6.DESCRIPTION OF AREAS OF NON-COMPLIANCE NOTED DURING THE INSPECTION, REQUIRED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, AND RECOMMENDED DATE OF COMPLETION OFCORRECTIVE ACTIONS:7.PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP:8.POTENTIAL AREAS OF FUTURE CONCERN:9.ADDITIONAL COMMENTSY N N/AY NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION357 PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION6442 CITY WEST PARKWAYSUITE 300EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344PH: 952-996-9662WWW.FUSION-AE.COMCOPYRIGHT 2025 FUSION AECSHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: 8/13/2025 2:50:21 PM AA ER 25-039 A000EDEN SPRINGS1620 ARBORETUM BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317TITLE SHEET EDEN SPRINGS 1620 ARBORETUM BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 SHEETSHEET NAME 2025-08-13 CITY SUBMITTALCITY SUBMITTAL A000 TITLE SHEET * A240 ROOF PLAN, MONUMENT SIGN, TRASH ENCLOSURE, EXTERIOR MATERIAL PALETTE * A301 RENDERED ELEVATIONS * RENDERINGS-1 EAST ENTRY DRIVE * RENDERINGS-2 WEST ENTRY DRIVE * RENDERINGS-3 DRIVEWAY * RENDERINGS-4 OTHER VIEWS * ISSUE RECORD #DATE DESCRIPTION 2025-08-13 CITY SUBMITTAL 358 ASPHALT SHINGLESROOF LEGENDSTANDING SEAM METAL ROOFMANUFACTURED STONECORONADO -TEXAS RUBBLE -SUMMER COTTAGEENGINEERED WOOD SIDING -SHAKESSNOWSCAPEENGINEERED WOOD SIDING -SHAKESQUARRY GRAYNATURAL SHADOW ASPHALT SHINGLESPEWTER GRAYSTANDING SEAM METAL ROOFDARK GRAYMANUFACTURED STONE SILLLIGHT GREYENGINEERED WOOD SIDING -TRIMSNOWSCAPE11' - 0" BASEDISPLAY HEIGHT2' - 8" SIGN9' - 0" SIGN DISPLAY WIDTH5' - 0" SIGN TOTAL HEIGHTLIGHTING TYPE: GROUND FLOOD LIGHTTHERE WILL BE A SEPARATE SIGNAGE SUBMITTAL AT A LATER DATE, UPDATING GRAPHICS AND PROVIDING MORE DETAILSPROJECT NO:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION6442 CITY WEST PARKWAYSUITE 300EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344PH: 952-996-9662WWW.FUSION-AE.COMCOPYRIGHT 2025 FUSION AECSHEET TITLE:SHEET NUMBER:8/13/2025 9:52:51 AMAAER25-039A240EDEN SPRINGS1620 ARBORETUM BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317ROOF PLAN,MONUMENT SIGN,TRASH ENCLOSURE,EXTERIOR MATERIALPALETTESCALE:1/2" = 1'-0"A2401MONUMENT SIGNISSUE RECORD#DATE DESCRIPTION2025-08-13 CITY SUBMITTAL 359 FIRST FLOOR 100' -0" MAX ROOF 135' -0" 1 ENGINEERED WOOD SIDING -CEDAR SHAKES -SNOWSCAPE WHITE 6 NATURAL SHADOW ASPHALT SHINGLES - PEWTER GRAY 5 ENGINEERED WOOD SIDING -TRIM - SNOWSCAPE WHITE 2 MANUFACTURED STONE -TEXAS RUBBLE STYLE -SUMMER COTTAGE 3 ENGINEERED WOOD SIDING -CEDAR SHAKES -QUARRY GRAY 4STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING -DARK GRAY 1 2 4 5 6 FIRST FLOOR 100' -0" MAX ROOF 135' -0" 1 ENGINEERED WOOD SIDING -CEDAR SHAKES -SNOWSCAPE WHITE 6 NATURAL SHADOW ASPHALT SHINGLES - PEWTER GRAY 5 ENGINEERED WOOD SIDING -TRIM - SNOWSCAPE WHITE 2 MANUFACTURED STONE -TEXAS RUBBLE STYLE -SUMMER COTTAGE 3 ENGINEERED WOOD SIDING -CEDAR SHAKES -QUARRY GRAY 1 2 3 5 6 FIRST FLOOR 100' -0" MAX ROOF 135' -0" 1 ENGINEERED WOOD SIDING -CEDAR SHAKES -SNOWSCAPE WHITE 6 NATURAL SHADOW ASPHALT SHINGLES - PEWTER GRAY 5 ENGINEERED WOOD SIDING -TRIM - SNOWSCAPE WHITE 2 MANUFACTURED STONE -TEXAS RUBBLE STYLE -SUMMER COTTAGE 3 ENGINEERED WOOD SIDING -CEDAR SHAKES -QUARRY GRAY 4STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING -DARK GRAY 1 4 5 6 FIRST FLOOR 100' -0" MAX ROOF 135' -0" 1 ENGINEERED WOOD SIDING -CEDAR SHAKES -SNOWSCAPE WHITE 6 NATURAL SHADOW ASPHALT SHINGLES - PEWTER GRAY 5 ENGINEERED WOOD SIDING -TRIM - SNOWSCAPE WHITE 2 MANUFACTURED STONE -TEXAS RUBBLE STYLE -SUMMER COTTAGE 3 ENGINEERED WOOD SIDING -CEDAR SHAKES -QUARRY GRAY 4 6 3 FIRST FLOOR 100' -0" MAX ROOF 135' -0" FIRST FLOOR 100' -0" MAX ROOF 135' -0" EXTERIOR MATERIAL LEGEND 1 ENGINEERED WOOD SIDING -CEDAR SHAKES -SNOWSCAPE WHITE 2 MANUFACTURED STONE -TEXAS RUBBLE STYLE -SUMMER COTTAGE 3 ENGINEERED WOOD SIDING -CEDAR SHAKES -QUARRY GRAY 4STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING -DARK GRAY 5 ENGINEERED WOOD SIDING -TRIM - SNOWSCAPE WHITE PERCENTAGE OF ACCENT MATERIAL TOTAL WALL SURFACE SQUARE FOOTAGE: 15,170 SQUARE FEET TOTAL WALL SURFACE OF ENGINEERED WOOD SIDING -CEDAR SHAKES -SNOWSCAPE WHITE : 3,410 SQUARE FEET (22% OF TOTAL WALL SURFACE) TOTAL WALL SURFACE OF MANUFACTURED STONE - CORONADO PRO-LEDGE HURON: 1,582 SQUARE FEET (10% OF TOTAL WALL SURFACE) 6 NATURAL SHADOW ASPHALT SHINGLES - PEWTER GRAY 2 FAUX WINDOW INTO ATTIC SPACE 3 EGRESS DOOR 4 FIXED WINDOWS. WHITE MULLIONS AND MUNTINS 5 ALUMINUM. POWDERCOATED WHITE. 6 DENTIL DETAIL EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES 1 CHIMNEY FOR GREASE HOOD SYSTEM PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION6442 CITY WEST PARKWAYSUITE 300EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344PH: 952-996-9662WWW.FUSION-AE.COMCOPYRIGHT 2025 FUSION AECSHEET TITLE: SHEET NUMBER: 8/13/2025 2:01:16 PM L.S. E.R. 25-039 A301EDEN SPRINGS1620 ARBORETUM BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317RENDERED ELEVATIONS SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"A301 1 SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING 1 SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"A301 3 WEST ELEVATION DORMER OPTION 1 SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"A301 2 NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING 1 SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"A301 4 EAST ELEVATION SCALE:3/32" = 1'-0"A301 5 NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING 1 Copy 1 SCALE:3/32" = 1'-0"A301 6 SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING 1 Copy 1 ISSUE RECORD #DATE DESCRIPTION 2025-08-13 CITY SUBMITTAL 360 FUSION-AE 6442 CITY WEST PARKWAY #300 EDEN PRARIE, MN 55344 952-996-9662EDEN SPRINGS RENDERINGS-1 2025-08-13 EAST ENTRY DRIVE 361 FUSION-AE 6442 CITY WEST PARKWAY #300 EDEN PRARIE, MN 55344 952-996-9662EDEN SPRINGS RENDERINGS-2 2025-08-13 WEST ENTRY DRIVE 362 FUSION-AE 6442 CITY WEST PARKWAY #300 EDEN PRARIE, MN 55344 952-996-9662EDEN SPRINGS RENDERINGS-3 2025-08-13 DRIVEWAY FUSION-AE 6442 CITY WEST PARKWAY #300 EDEN PRARIE, MN 55344 952-996-9662EDEN SPRINGS RENDERINGS-3 2025-08-13 DRIVEWAY 363 FUSION-AE 6442 CITY WEST PARKWAY #300 EDEN PRARIE, MN 55344 952-996-9662EDEN SPRINGS RENDERINGS-4 2025-08-13 OTHER VIEWS 364 Civil Site Group, PC 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley Minnesota 55422 www.CivilSiteGroup.com (612) 615-0060 Stormwater Management Report Owner: Lighthouse Homes, LLC 168 Pioneer Trail, No 129 Chaska, MN 55318 Project: Eden Springs 1620 Arboretum Blvd Chanhassen, MN 55317 Engineer’s Certification: All plans and supporting Documentation contained in this report have been reviewed by me and it is hereby certified that to the best of my knowledge the plans comply with the requirements of the ordinance. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Anders Melby, P.E. Registration Number: 58960 Date: 5/15/2025 365 Civil Site Group, PC 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley Minnesota 55422 www.CivilSiteGroup.com (612) 615-0060 Table of Contents: 1.0 Cover Sheet, Engineer’s Certification 2.0 Summary Analysis / Narrative 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Existing Site Conditions 2.3 Proposed Site Conditions 2.4 Stormwater Requirements – City 2.5 Stormwater Requirements – Watershed District 2.6 Stormwater Requirements – MPCA / NPDES 3.0 Stormwater Calculations 3.1 Proposed Stormwater Management Strategy & Facilities Description 3.2 Rate Control 3.3 Volume Control 3.4 Water Quality 3.5 Buffer Area for Wetland and Creeks 3.6 Wetland Inundation & Bounce 4.0 Conclusions Figures: Figure 1 – Drainage Calculations Summary Table Figure 2 – Existing Conditions Drainage Area Map Figure 3 – Proposed Conditions Drainage Area Map Appendices: HydroCAD Existing Conditions HydroCAD Modeling Proposed Conditions HydroCAD Modeling MIDS Results SHSAM Modeling Memo Geotechnical Report 366 Civil Site Group, PC 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley Minnesota 55422 www.CivilSiteGroup.com (612) 615-0060 2.0 Summary Analysis / Narrative: 2.1 Introduction: This stormwater management report accompanies the Civil Engineering Plans prepared by Civil Site Group for the subject project dated 5/15/2025 and serves as attachment D to the storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP). This report includes a summary of the existing and proposed site conditions, the stormwater requirements of relevant regulatory agencies, and proposed design calculations and data to meet the requirements. 2.2 Existing Site Conditions: Site Description: The existing site is currently an open, grass covered lot with woods and a wetland on the north side. Riley Creek runs adjacent to the northern border. The existing site surface coverage areas are shown in the table below: Existing Soils: A geotechnical evaluation report was completed by Haugo Geotechnical Services dated January 5, 2018. This report determined the soils on site are predominantly Silty Clay topsoil over Sandy Lean Clay (CL). For the purposes of this report, soils have been assumed to have a hydrologic soil group “D” designation. Groundwater: Groundwater encountered in the soil borings at elevations ranging from 946 to 950 feet. 2.3 Proposed Site Conditions: Site Description: The proposed site is a development of the parcel into a single-story senior assisted living facility with parking, landscaping, and aboveground stormwater management. The proposed site surface coverage areas are shown in the table below: Area [SF] CN Value Area [SF] CN Value Area [SF] CN Value EX1A 0 98 16477 84 16477 84 EX1B 0 98 99974 84 99974 84 EX2 0 98 25195 84 25195 84 EX3 1058 98 16142 84 17200 85 Existing Conditions Total AreaImpervious AreaDrainage Area Pervious Area Area [SF] CN Value Area [SF] CN Value Area [SF] CN Value PR1A 303 98 10736 84 11039 84 PR1B 469 98 52449 84 52918 84 PR1C 54737 98 11583 84 66320 96 PR1D 0 98 13349 84 13349 84 PR2 0 98 9022 84 9022 84 PR3 2656 98 3542 84 6198 90 Pervious Area Total Area Proposed Conditions Drainage Area Impervious Area 367 Civil Site Group, PC 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley Minnesota 55422 www.CivilSiteGroup.com (612) 615-0060 2.4 Stormwater Requirements City (Chanhassen) The City of Chanhassen’s stormwater requirements generally conform to the watershed’s regulations. 2.5 Stormwater Requirements Watershed (Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District): Requirement threshold - Projects that alter or remove 5,000 square feet or more of land-surface area or vegetation. Rate Control – Limit peak runoff flow rates to that from existing conditions for all points where stormwater discharge leaves the site for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year frequency storm events using a nested 24-hour rainfall distribution, and a 100-year frequency 10- day snowmelt. Water Quality – Provide: Volume abstraction in accordance per volume control requirements, or Treatment onsite or in the same subwatershed as the land-disturbing activity to the equivalent of: o At least 60% annual removal efficiency for the total phosphorus (TP) from site runoff; o At least 90% annual removal efficiency for total suspended solids (TSS) from site runoff, and o No net increase in TSS or TP loading from the site compared to existing conditions. The onsite abstraction of runoff may be included in demonstrating compliance with the TSS and TP removal requirements. Volume Control – Provide abstraction onsite or in the same subwatershed as the land-disturbing activity of: 1.1 inch from regulated impervious surface, or The volume for the 95th percentile storm-event runoff from the site. Wetland Protection – Bounce and inundation: No activity subject to this rule may alter a site in a manner that alters the bounce in water level, duration of inundation, or change the runout elevation in the subwatershed in which the site is located for any wetland receiving discharge direction from the site beyond the limits specified in Table J.1, which is incorporated into and a part of this rule. Treatment of runoff to wetlands: Discharge from regulated disturbed area to protected wetland must be treated to meet: o Water quality rules highlighted above for discharge to low- or medium-value wetland; o At least 75% annual removal efficiency for TP and at least 90% annual removal efficiency for TSS prior to discharge to a high- or exceptional-value wetland. o 368 Civil Site Group, PC 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley Minnesota 55422 www.CivilSiteGroup.com (612) 615-0060 2.6 Stormwater Requirements - Minnesota Pollution Control Agency – NPDES permit (MPCA): Requirement threshold - A permit is required for projects with a disturbed area over 1 acre in size, Stormwater management is required for a project adding 1-acre of more of NEW impervious surface (reconstructed impervious is not included). Rate Control – No specific regulation, may not degrade downstream facilities. Water Quality – Stormwater water quality treatment volume must be provided equal to 1.0” over all new impervious surfaces (includes all newly constructed impervious surfaces only, re-constructed impervious surfaces are not included). Volume Control – Must consider volume reduction if feasible and not prohibited on site. The required infiltration volume is equal to the water quality volume described above. 3.0 Stormwater Calculations: 3.1 Proposed Stormwater Management Strategy & Facilities Description This project is disturbing approximately 2.8 acres of land. The project will be constructing 1.3 acres of new/reconstructed impervious surfaces. This land disturbance and creation of impervious surfaces will trigger stormwater management requirements from the City of Chanhassen, the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District and the MPCA NPDES permit. The proposed stormwater strategy for this project is directing nearly all of the impervious area to a rainwater reuse system to be used for irrigation for approximately 1.5 acres of pervious area onsite. Water that exceeds the reuse basin retention volume will continue to a biofiltration basin for additional abstraction and treatment before discharging upgradient of Riley Creek. Stormwater treatment is also provided by pervious areas draining west and the extensive wetland and creek buffer area. Proprietary stormwater treatment devices are used prior to reuse basin retention for water quality and pre-treatment prior to reuse, and a proprietary filter is used prior to the biofiltration basin. 3.2 Rate Control Limit peak runoff flow rates to that from existing conditions for all points where stormwater discharge leaves the site for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year frequency storm events using a nested 24-hour rainfall distribution, and a 100-year frequency 10- day snowmelt. Rate control is provided by underground retention within the reuse basin and live storage within the biofiltration basin. This information was derived using HydroCAD stormwater modeling software. The existing and proposed runoff rates are shown in the summary table below. 369 Civil Site Group, PC 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley Minnesota 55422 www.CivilSiteGroup.com (612) 615-0060 In addition, the existing and proposed runoff rates are compared leaving the site in different directions below in order to show no significant change in downgradient hydrology expected. 2-YR [2.87"] 10-YR [4.26"] 100-YR [7.36"] SNOWMELT 1R - EX WETLAND 0.95 1.80 3.46 0.06 2R - RILEY CREEK 5.05 9.59 18.53 0.44 EX2 - WEST PROP. 1.45 2.75 5.28 0.10 EX3 - W 78TH ST. 1.09 2.04 3.86 0.07 TOTAL (REACH) 7.59 14.38 27.67 0.61 2-YR [2.87"] 10-YR [4.26"] 100-YR [7.36"] SNOWMELT 1R - EX WETLAND 0.65 1.22 2.32 0.04 2R - RILEY CREEK 2.88 5.40 14.26 0.31 PR2 - WEST PROP. 0.52 0.99 1.89 0.03 PR3 - W 78TH ST. 0.47 0.78 1.37 0.03 TOTAL (REACH) 3.87 7.17 17.52 0.37 Overall Stormwater Rate Summary 2-Year Event 7.59 3.87 10-Year Event 14.38 7.17 100-Year Event 27.67 17.52 SNOWMELT 0.61 0.37 Drainage Area Existing Conditions Rate (cfs) Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) Existing Rate (cfs)Drainage Area Stormwater Rate Summary 370 Civil Site Group, PC 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley Minnesota 55422 www.CivilSiteGroup.com (612) 615-0060 The proposed runoff rates are less that the existing peak runoff rates – REQUIREMENT SATISFIED 3.3 Volume Control Abstraction of 1.1” of runoff onsite cannot be practicably met due to the tested infiltration rate of 0.00 in/hr creating a restricting condition onsite. The water volume abstraction requirement 3.3a of 0.55” over the impervious area is provided by a stormwater reuse system and within the biofiltration basin. Abstraction volumes were calculated using the MIDS calculator. Stormwater Rate Summary - To Existing Wetland 2-Year Event 0.95 0.65 10-Year Event 1.80 1.22 100-Year Event 3.46 2.32 SNOWMELT 0.06 0.04 Stormwater Rate Summary - To Riley Creek 2-Year Event 5.05 2.88 10-Year Event 9.59 5.40 100-Year Event 18.53 14.26 SNOWMELT 0.44 0.31 Stormwater Rate Summary - To Western Adjacent Prope rty 2-Year Event 1.45 0.52 10-Year Event 2.75 0.99 100-Year Event 5.28 1.89 SNOWMELT 0.10 0.03 Stormwater Rate Summary - To West 78th Street 2-Year Event 1.09 0.47 10-Year Event 2.04 0.78 100-Year Event 3.86 1.37 SNOWMELT 0.07 0.03 Existing Conditions Rate (cfs) Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) Existing Conditions Rate (cfs) Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) Existing Conditions Rate (cfs) Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) Existing Conditions Rate (cfs) Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) 371 Civil Site Group, PC 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley Minnesota 55422 www.CivilSiteGroup.com (612) 615-0060 The proposed volume abstracted by the stormwater reuse system and biofilter does not provide the required abstraction volume of 1.1” over the impervious area due to site restrictions. The proposed BMPs do provide as much abstraction as feasible and achieves abstraction of more than 0.55” over the impervious area as per requirement 3.3a. – VOLUME REQUIREMENT SATISFIED 3.4 Water Quality Water quality requirements are met in a combination of stormwater BMP devices and natural features. TSS and TP removal were estimated in the MIDS calculator. The majority of the imperious area are pretreated by hydrodynamic separators prior to retention and reuse in the underground reuse basin. Water in excess of the reuse retention volume flows into the biofiltration basin and is treated through a minimum of 24” biofiltration Type C Media Mix as prescribed in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. Rain falling on PR2 and PR1 are treated via over land flow; runoff towards the west through managed turf, and water towards the existing wetland and Riley Creek through native vegetation. Hydrodynamic separators were sized based SHSAM software modeling for at least 10% removal, as summarized in the memo appended to this report. The proposed water quality calculations are the result of MIDS modeling and summarized in the table below: The proposed water quality design achieves 90% TSS removal and 60% TP removal which meet or exceed the water quality removal requirements for the project site. – WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENT SATISFIED Stormwater Water Quality and Volume Summary New Impv. Area (sf) Required Volume (cf) Required Volume (cf) 1.1" * New Imp. 0.55" * New Imp. PR1A 303 28 14 PR1B 469 43 21 PR1C 54737 5018 2509 PR1D 0 0 0 PR2 0 0 0 PR3 2656 243 122 TOTAL 58165 5332 2666 Inf. Area (sf) Assoc. Inf. Height (ft) Drawdown Time (h) Filtration Basin 1 4993 3903 1.28 19.19 TOTAL 4993 REUSE/IRRIGATION SYSTEM 2599 BIOFILTER 208 TOTAL 2807 Proposed BMP Area Provided Abstraction Volume (cf) Drawdown Time Calculations (0.8"/Hour) Drainage Area Proposed BMP Area Provided Vol (cf) Required Infiltration Vol. Summary Pollutant Removal Calculations Pollutant Proposed Loading Removed by BMPs Removal Efficiency TSS (lb/yr) 615.2 551.30 90% TP (lb/yr) 3.3864 2.018 60% Pollutant Existing Outflow Proposed Outflow Net Reduction TSS (lb/yr) 175.56 63.90 111.66 TP (lb/yr) 1.4867 1.37 0.12 372 Civil Site Group, PC 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley Minnesota 55422 www.CivilSiteGroup.com (612) 615-0060 3.5 Buffer Area for Wetland The wetland onsite was delineated by Jacobson Environmental, PLLC in a report dated October 17, 2018 and revised December 12, 2018 including a MnRAM assessment. Per RPBCWD Rule D, Appendix D1 the onsite wetland is considered a “Medium value wetland” as it does not meet any higher quality requirements. Therefore the wetland requires a 40-foot average buffer and minimum 20-foot buffer. The buffer minimum is per City of Chanhassen regulations. In addition, Riley Creek requires a 50-foot average buffer with a minimum of 30-feet.As the buffers begin to overlap significantly, the two buffer areas have been combined for calculation purposes with respect to both minimum width requirements. The onsite area footprint is 17,590 sqft and 28,656 sqft for the wetland and creek buffer, respectively. The proposed buffer to be created has an area of 40,175 sqft with a minimum with of 20-feet and a maximum width of 98.7-feet from the creek. The “By Code” and “Proposed Averaged” buffers are depicted on plan sheet C2.1 – WETLAND BUFFER REQUIREMENT SATISFIED 3.6 Wetland Bounce and Inundation Analysis is required to demonstrate the change in bounce of water level, duration of inundation, and change in runout elevation criteria for the wetland. Per communication with the watershed consultant, the wetland was modeled as a rectangular/vee-type channel Reach in HydroCAD. The subwatershed drainage maps are presented following the sitewide existing and proposed drainage maps. RUNOUT ELEVATION: Since no grading will take place at the wetland outlet (the northernmost elevation of the wetland is roughly 951.80,) the runout elevation will not change. INUNDATION PERIOD: Because the wetland has no storage, there is no inundation period for existing or proposed conditions for the 1-year 2-year, or 10-year period events. CHANGE IN BOUNCE: While Table J1 only specifies limits for the 10-year storm, the table below shows the average flow depths for the 2-yr, 10-yr, and 100-yr storm. The depth is maintained or decreased in proposed conditions. 4.0 Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this project meets all State, City and Watershed District stormwater management requirements. Wetland Bounce & Innundation Calculations Medium Value Wetland 2-yr Flow Depth (in) 10-yr Flow Depth (in) 100-yr Flow Depth (in) Existing Conditions 1.41 2.61 5.53 Proposed Conditions 1.41 2.58 5.44 Difference 0.00 -0.03 -0.09 Permissible Limit N/A EXIST. PLUS/MINUS 1' N/A 373 Civil Site Group - Stormwater Calculations Area [SF] CN Value Area [SF] CN Value Area [SF] CN Value EX1A 0 98 16477 84 16477 84 EX1B 0 98 99974 84 99974 84 EX2 0 98 25195 84 25195 84 EX3 1058 98 16142 84 17200 85 Area [SF] CN Value Area [SF] CN Value Area [SF] CN Value PR1A 303 98 10736 84 11039 84 PR1B 469 98 52449 84 52918 84 PR1C 54737 98 11583 84 66320 96 PR1D 0 98 13349 84 13349 84 PR2 0 98 9022 84 9022 84 PR3 2656 98 3542 84 6198 90 Impervious [SF] Impervious [AC] Pervious [SF] Pervious [AC] Total [SF] Total [AC] Existing Site 1058 0.02 157788 3.62 158846 3.65 Proposed Site 58165 1.34 100681 2.31 158846 3.65 2-YR [2.87"] 10-YR [4.26"] 100-YR [7.36"] SNOWMELT 1R - EX WETLAND 0.95 1.80 3.46 0.06 2R - RILEY CREEK 5.05 9.59 18.53 0.44 EX2 - WEST PROP. 1.45 2.75 5.28 0.10 EX3 - W 78TH ST. 1.09 2.04 3.86 0.07 TOTAL (REACH) 7.59 14.38 27.67 0.61 2-YR [2.87"] 10-YR [4.26"] 100-YR [7.36"] SNOWMELT 1R - EX WETLAND 0.65 1.22 2.32 0.04 2R - RILEY CREEK 2.88 5.40 14.26 0.31 PR2 - WEST PROP. 0.52 0.99 1.89 0.03 PR3 - W 78TH ST. 0.47 0.78 1.37 0.03 TOTAL (REACH) 3.87 7.17 17.52 0.37 Overall Stormwater Rate Summary 2-Year Event 7.59 3.87 10-Year Event 14.38 7.17 100-Year Event 27.67 17.52 SNOWMELT 0.61 0.37 Stormwater Rate Summary - To Existing Wetland 2-Year Event 0.95 0.65 10-Year Event 1.80 1.22 100-Year Event 3.46 2.32 SNOWMELT 0.06 0.04 Stormwater Rate Summary - To Riley Creek 2-Year Event 5.05 2.88 10-Year Event 9.59 5.40 100-Year Event 18.53 14.26 SNOWMELT 0.44 0.31 Stormwater Rate Summary - To Western Adjacent Property 2-Year Event 1.45 0.52 10-Year Event 2.75 0.99 100-Year Event 5.28 1.89 SNOWMELT 0.10 0.03 Drainage Area Stormwater Rate Summary Existing Conditions Rate (cfs) Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) Site Area Summary Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) Eden Springs - Chanhassen Pervious Area Total Area Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions Drainage Area Impervious Area Total AreaImpervious AreaDrainage Area Pervious Area Existing Rate (cfs) Drainage Area Existing Conditions Rate (cfs) Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) Existing Conditions Rate (cfs) Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) Existing Conditions Rate (cfs) 374 Stormwater Rate Summary - To West 78th Street 2-Year Event 1.09 0.47 10-Year Event 2.04 0.78 100-Year Event 3.86 1.37 SNOWMELT 0.07 0.03 Stormwater Water Quality and Volume Summary New Impv. Area (sf) Required Volume (cf) Required Volume (cf) 1.1" * New Imp. 0.55" * New Imp. PR1A 303 28 14 PR1B 469 43 21 PR1C 54737 5018 2509 PR1D 0 0 0 PR2 0 0 0 PR3 2656 243 122 TOTAL 58165 5332 2666 Inf. Area (sf) Assoc. Inf. Height (ft) Drawdown Time (h) Filtration Basin 1 4993 3903 1.28 19.19 TOTAL 4993 REUSE/IRRIGATION SYSTEM 2599 BIOFILTER 208 TOTAL 2807 Pollutant Removal Calculations Pollutant Proposed Loading Removed by BMPs Removal Efficiency TSS (lb/yr) 615.2 551.30 90% TP (lb/yr) 3.3864 2.018 60% Pollutant Existing Outflow Proposed Outflow Net Reduction TSS (lb/yr) 175.56 63.90 111.66 TP (lb/yr) 1.4867 1.37 0.12 Wetland Bounce & Innundation Calculations Medium Value Wetland 2-yr Flow Depth (in) 10-yr Flow Depth (in) 100-yr Flow Depth (in) Existing Conditions 1.41 2.61 5.53 Proposed Conditions 1.41 2.58 5.44 Difference 0.00 -0.03 -0.09 Permissible Limit N/A EXIST. PLUS/MINUS 1' N/A Proposed BMP Area Provided Vol (cf) Required Infiltration Vol. Summary Existing Conditions Rate (cfs) Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) Drainage Area Proposed BMP Area Provided Abstraction Volume (cf) Drawdown Time Calculations (0.8"/Hour) 375 12" RCP 12" RCPW 78th St(A Public R/W)Centerline of CreekEX1AEX IMPV = 0 SFEX PERV = 16,477 SFTOTAL = 16,477 SFEX1BEX IMPV = 0 SFEX PERV = 99,974 SFTOTAL = 99,974 SFEX2EX IMPV = 0 SFEX PERV = 25,195 SFTOTAL = 25,195 SFEX3EX IMPV = 1,058 SFEX PERV = 16,142 SFTOTAL = 17,200 SFProject Number:Issue Date:Revision Number:Revision Date:612-615-0060www.CivilSiteGroup.comEDEN SPRINGS251025/15/20251620 ARBORETUM BLVD, CHANHASSEN, MN 55317EXISTING DRAINAGE MAPDA 1..01" = 50'-0"50'-0"25'-0"N1R2R376 12" RCP 12" RCPW 78th St(A Public R/W)Centerline of Creek99'-10 1/2"100'-0"WETLANDNO PARKING NO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKINGDROPOFF ZONENO PARKING99'-10 1/2"100'-0"PR1APR IMPV = 303 SFPR PERV = 10,736 SFTOTAL = 11,039 SFPR1BPR IMPV = 469 SFPR PERV = 52,449 SFTOTAL = 52,918 SFPR1CPR IMPV = 54,737 SFPR PERV = 11,583 SFTOTAL = 66,320 SFPR3PR IMPV = 2,656 SFPR PERV = 3,542 SFTOTAL = 6,198 SFPR1DPR IMPV = 0 SFPR PERV = 13,349 SFTOTAL = 13,349 SFPR2PR IMPV = 0 SFPR PERV = 9,022 SFTOTAL = 9,022 SFProject Number:Issue Date:Revision Number:Revision Date:612-615-0060www.CivilSiteGroup.comEDEN SPRINGS251025/15/20251620 ARBORETUM BLVD, CHANHASSEN, MN 55317PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAPDA 2..01" = 50'-0"50'-0"25'-0"N1P1R2R2P377 EXISTING CONDITIONS EX1A TO WETLAND EX1B TO CREEK EX2 TO WESTERN PROPERTY EX3 TO W 78TH ST 1R EX WETLAND 2R RILEY CREEK Routing Diagram for 25102 EXISTING Prepared by Civil Site Group, Printed 5/14/2025 HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Subcat Reach Pond Link 378 25102 EXISTING Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 2HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Rainfall Events Listing (selected events) Event# Event Name Storm Type Curve Mode 1 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24h r 2 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24h r 3 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100 y 24h r 4 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr 379 25102 EXISTING Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 3HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (all nodes) Area (acres) CN Description (subcatchment-numbers) 0.973 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D (EX2, EX3) 2.673 84 PERVIOUS (EX1A, EX1B) 0.024 98 Paved parking, HSG D (EX3) 3.671 84 TOTAL AREA 380 25102 EXISTING Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 4HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Soil Listing (all nodes) Area (acres) Soil Group Subcatchment Numbers 0.000 HSG A 0.000 HSG B 0.000 HSG C 0.998 HSG D EX2, EX3 2.673 Other EX1A, EX1B 3.671 TOTAL AREA 381 25102 EXISTING Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 5HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG-A (acres) HSG-B (acres) HSG-C (acres) HSG-D (acres) Other (acres) Total (acres) Ground Cover Subcatchment Numbers 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.973 0.000 0.973 50-75% Grass cover, Fair EX2, EX3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.673 2.673 PERVIOUS EX1A, EX1B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.024 0.000 0.024 Paved parking EX3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.998 2.673 3.671 TOTAL AREA 382 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 6HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=16,477 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.41"Subcatchment EX1A: TO WETLAND Tc=6.0 min CN=84 Runoff=0.95 cfs 0.044 af Runoff Area=99,974 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.41"Subcatchment EX1B: TO CREEK Flow Length=326' Tc=11.7 min CN=WQ Runoff=4.41 cfs 0.270 af Runoff Area=25,195 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.41"Subcatchment EX2: TO WESTERN Tc=6.0 min CN=84 Runoff=1.45 cfs 0.068 af Runoff Area=18,258 sf 5.79% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.48"Subcatchment EX3: TO W 78TH ST Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=1.09 cfs 0.052 af Inflow=0.95 cfs 0.044 afReach 1R: EX WETLAND Outflow=0.95 cfs 0.044 af Inflow=5.05 cfs 0.314 afReach 2R: RILEY CREEK Outflow=5.05 cfs 0.314 af Total Runoff Area = 3.671 ac Runoff Volume = 0.434 af Average Runoff Depth = 1.42" 99.34% Pervious = 3.647 ac 0.66% Impervious = 0.024 ac 383 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 7HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX1A: TO WETLAND Runoff = 0.95 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.044 af, Depth= 1.41" Routed to Reach 1R : EX WETLAND Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description * 16,477 84 PERVIOUS 16,477 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX1A: TO WETLAND Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=16,477 sf Runoff Volume=0.044 af Runoff Depth=1.41" Tc=6.0 min CN=84 0.95 cfs 384 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 8HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment EX1A: TO WETLAND Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 15.00 2.54 1.15 0.03 20.00 2.76 1.32 0.01 25.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 30.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 35.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 40.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 45.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 50.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 55.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 60.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 65.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 70.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 75.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 80.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 85.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 90.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 95.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 100.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 105.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 110.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 115.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 120.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 125.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 130.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 135.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 140.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 145.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 150.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 155.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 160.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 165.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 170.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 175.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 180.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 185.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 190.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 195.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 200.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 205.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 210.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 215.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 220.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 225.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 230.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 235.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 240.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 385 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 9HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX1B: TO CREEK Runoff = 4.41 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.270 af, Depth= 1.41" Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description * 0 98 * 99,974 84 PERVIOUS 99,974 Weighted Average 99,974 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 9.1 100 0.0690 0.18 Sheet Flow, SF Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.94" 2.6 226 0.0440 1.47 Shallow Concentrated Flow, SCF Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 11.7 326 Total Subcatchment EX1B: TO CREEK Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)4 3 2 1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=99,974 sf Runoff Volume=0.270 af Runoff Depth=1.41" Flow Length=326' Tc=11.7 min CN=WQ 4.41 cfs 386 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 10HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment EX1B: TO CREEK Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.43 0.00 0.01 15.00 2.54 1.15 0.19 20.00 2.76 1.32 0.05 25.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 30.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 35.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 40.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 45.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 50.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 55.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 60.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 65.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 70.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 75.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 80.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 85.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 90.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 95.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 100.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 105.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 110.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 115.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 120.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 125.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 130.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 135.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 140.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 145.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 150.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 155.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 160.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 165.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 170.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 175.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 180.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 185.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 190.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 195.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 200.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 205.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 210.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 215.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 220.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 225.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 230.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 235.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 240.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 387 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 11HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Runoff = 1.45 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.068 af, Depth= 1.41" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description 25,195 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 25,195 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=25,195 sf Runoff Volume=0.068 af Runoff Depth=1.41" Tc=6.0 min CN=84 1.45 cfs 388 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 12HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment EX2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 15.00 2.54 1.15 0.05 20.00 2.76 1.32 0.01 25.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 30.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 35.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 40.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 45.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 50.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 55.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 60.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 65.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 70.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 75.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 80.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 85.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 90.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 95.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 100.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 105.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 110.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 115.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 120.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 125.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 130.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 135.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 140.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 145.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 150.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 155.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 160.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 165.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 170.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 175.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 180.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 185.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 190.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 195.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 200.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 205.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 210.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 215.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 220.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 225.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 230.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 235.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 240.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 389 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 13HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX3: TO W 78TH ST Runoff = 1.09 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.052 af, Depth= 1.48" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description 1,058 98 Paved parking, HSG D 17,200 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 18,258 Weighted Average 17,200 94.21% Pervious Area 1,058 5.79% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX3: TO W 78TH ST Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=18,258 sf Runoff Volume=0.052 af Runoff Depth=1.48" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 1.09 cfs 390 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 14HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment EX3: TO W 78TH ST Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 15.00 2.54 1.21 0.04 20.00 2.76 1.39 0.01 25.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 30.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 35.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 40.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 45.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 50.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 55.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 60.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 65.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 70.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 75.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 80.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 85.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 90.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 95.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 100.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 105.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 110.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 115.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 120.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 125.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 130.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 135.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 140.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 145.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 150.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 155.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 160.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 165.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 170.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 175.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 180.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 185.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 190.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 195.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 200.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 205.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 210.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 215.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 220.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 225.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 230.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 235.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 240.00 2.87 1.48 0.00 391 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 15HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 1R: EX WETLAND [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.378 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.41" for 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 event Inflow = 0.95 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.044 af Outflow = 0.95 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.044 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 1R: EX WETLAND Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)1 0 Inflow Area=0.378 ac 0.95 cfs 0.95 cfs 392 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 16HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Reach 1R: EX WETLAND Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.03 0.03 20.00 0.01 0.01 25.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 85.00 0.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 105.00 0.00 0.00 110.00 0.00 0.00 115.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0.00 130.00 0.00 0.00 135.00 0.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 0.00 145.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 0.00 155.00 0.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 0.00 165.00 0.00 0.00 170.00 0.00 0.00 175.00 0.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 0.00 185.00 0.00 0.00 190.00 0.00 0.00 195.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 205.00 0.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 0.00 215.00 0.00 0.00 220.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 0.00 0.00 235.00 0.00 0.00 240.00 0.00 0.00 393 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 17HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.673 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.41" for 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 event Inflow = 5.05 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.314 af Outflow = 5.05 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.314 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=2.673 ac 5.05 cfs 5.05 cfs 394 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 18HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.01 0.01 15.00 0.22 0.22 20.00 0.06 0.06 25.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 85.00 0.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 105.00 0.00 0.00 110.00 0.00 0.00 115.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0.00 130.00 0.00 0.00 135.00 0.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 0.00 145.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 0.00 155.00 0.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 0.00 165.00 0.00 0.00 170.00 0.00 0.00 175.00 0.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 0.00 185.00 0.00 0.00 190.00 0.00 0.00 195.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 205.00 0.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 0.00 215.00 0.00 0.00 220.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 0.00 0.00 235.00 0.00 0.00 240.00 0.00 0.00 395 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 19HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=16,477 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.61"Subcatchment EX1A: TO WETLAND Tc=6.0 min CN=84 Runoff=1.80 cfs 0.082 af Runoff Area=99,974 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.61"Subcatchment EX1B: TO CREEK Flow Length=326' Tc=11.7 min CN=WQ Runoff=8.38 cfs 0.499 af Runoff Area=25,195 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.61"Subcatchment EX2: TO WESTERN Tc=6.0 min CN=84 Runoff=2.75 cfs 0.126 af Runoff Area=18,258 sf 5.79% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.69"Subcatchment EX3: TO W 78TH ST Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=2.04 cfs 0.094 af Inflow=1.80 cfs 0.082 afReach 1R: EX WETLAND Outflow=1.80 cfs 0.082 af Inflow=9.59 cfs 0.582 afReach 2R: RILEY CREEK Outflow=9.59 cfs 0.582 af Total Runoff Area = 3.671 ac Runoff Volume = 0.801 af Average Runoff Depth = 2.62" 99.34% Pervious = 3.647 ac 0.66% Impervious = 0.024 ac 396 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 20HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX1A: TO WETLAND Runoff = 1.80 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.082 af, Depth= 2.61" Routed to Reach 1R : EX WETLAND Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Area (sf) CN Description * 16,477 84 PERVIOUS 16,477 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX1A: TO WETLAND Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)2 1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Runoff Area=16,477 sf Runoff Volume=0.082 af Runoff Depth=2.61" Tc=6.0 min CN=84 1.80 cfs 397 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 21HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment EX1A: TO WETLAND Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.55 0.01 0.01 15.00 3.89 2.27 0.06 20.00 4.17 2.52 0.01 25.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 30.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 35.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 40.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 45.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 50.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 55.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 60.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 65.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 70.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 75.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 80.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 85.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 90.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 95.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 100.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 105.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 110.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 115.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 120.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 125.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 130.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 135.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 140.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 145.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 150.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 155.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 160.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 165.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 170.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 175.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 180.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 185.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 190.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 195.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 200.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 205.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 210.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 215.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 220.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 225.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 230.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 235.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 240.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 398 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 22HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX1B: TO CREEK Runoff = 8.38 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.499 af, Depth= 2.61" Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Area (sf) CN Description * 0 98 * 99,974 84 PERVIOUS 99,974 Weighted Average 99,974 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 9.1 100 0.0690 0.18 Sheet Flow, SF Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.94" 2.6 226 0.0440 1.47 Shallow Concentrated Flow, SCF Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 11.7 326 Total Subcatchment EX1B: TO CREEK Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Runoff Area=99,974 sf Runoff Volume=0.499 af Runoff Depth=2.61" Flow Length=326' Tc=11.7 min CN=WQ 8.38 cfs 399 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 23HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment EX1B: TO CREEK Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.55 0.01 0.05 15.00 3.89 2.27 0.34 20.00 4.17 2.52 0.05 25.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 30.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 35.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 40.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 45.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 50.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 55.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 60.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 65.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 70.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 75.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 80.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 85.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 90.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 95.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 100.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 105.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 110.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 115.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 120.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 125.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 130.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 135.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 140.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 145.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 150.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 155.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 160.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 165.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 170.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 175.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 180.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 185.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 190.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 195.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 200.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 205.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 210.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 215.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 220.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 225.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 230.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 235.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 240.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 400 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 24HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Runoff = 2.75 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.126 af, Depth= 2.61" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Area (sf) CN Description 25,195 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 25,195 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)3 2 1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Runoff Area=25,195 sf Runoff Volume=0.126 af Runoff Depth=2.61" Tc=6.0 min CN=84 2.75 cfs 401 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 25HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment EX2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.55 0.01 0.01 15.00 3.89 2.27 0.09 20.00 4.17 2.52 0.01 25.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 30.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 35.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 40.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 45.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 50.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 55.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 60.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 65.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 70.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 75.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 80.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 85.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 90.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 95.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 100.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 105.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 110.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 115.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 120.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 125.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 130.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 135.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 140.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 145.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 150.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 155.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 160.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 165.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 170.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 175.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 180.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 185.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 190.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 195.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 200.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 205.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 210.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 215.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 220.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 225.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 230.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 235.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 240.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 402 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 26HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX3: TO W 78TH ST Runoff = 2.04 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.094 af, Depth= 2.69" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Area (sf) CN Description 1,058 98 Paved parking, HSG D 17,200 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 18,258 Weighted Average 17,200 94.21% Pervious Area 1,058 5.79% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX3: TO W 78TH ST Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)2 1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Runoff Area=18,258 sf Runoff Volume=0.094 af Runoff Depth=2.69" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 2.04 cfs 403 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 27HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment EX3: TO W 78TH ST Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.55 0.02 0.01 15.00 3.89 2.36 0.06 20.00 4.17 2.61 0.01 25.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 30.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 35.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 40.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 45.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 50.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 55.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 60.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 65.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 70.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 75.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 80.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 85.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 90.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 95.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 100.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 105.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 110.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 115.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 120.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 125.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 130.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 135.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 140.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 145.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 150.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 155.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 160.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 165.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 170.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 175.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 180.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 185.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 190.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 195.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 200.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 205.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 210.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 215.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 220.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 225.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 230.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 235.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 240.00 4.27 2.70 0.00 404 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 28HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 1R: EX WETLAND [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.378 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.61" for 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 event Inflow = 1.80 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.082 af Outflow = 1.80 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.082 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 1R: EX WETLAND Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)2 1 0 Inflow Area=0.378 ac 1.80 cfs 1.80 cfs 405 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 29HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Reach 1R: EX WETLAND Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.01 0.01 15.00 0.06 0.06 20.00 0.01 0.01 25.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 85.00 0.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 105.00 0.00 0.00 110.00 0.00 0.00 115.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0.00 130.00 0.00 0.00 135.00 0.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 0.00 145.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 0.00 155.00 0.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 0.00 165.00 0.00 0.00 170.00 0.00 0.00 175.00 0.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 0.00 185.00 0.00 0.00 190.00 0.00 0.00 195.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 205.00 0.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 0.00 215.00 0.00 0.00 220.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 0.00 0.00 235.00 0.00 0.00 240.00 0.00 0.00 406 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 30HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.673 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.61" for 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 event Inflow = 9.59 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.582 af Outflow = 9.59 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.582 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=2.673 ac 9.59 cfs 9.59 cfs 407 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 31HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.06 0.06 15.00 0.40 0.40 20.00 0.06 0.06 25.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 85.00 0.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 105.00 0.00 0.00 110.00 0.00 0.00 115.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0.00 130.00 0.00 0.00 135.00 0.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 0.00 145.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 0.00 155.00 0.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 0.00 165.00 0.00 0.00 170.00 0.00 0.00 175.00 0.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 0.00 185.00 0.00 0.00 190.00 0.00 0.00 195.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 205.00 0.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 0.00 215.00 0.00 0.00 220.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 0.00 0.00 235.00 0.00 0.00 240.00 0.00 0.00 408 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 32HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=16,477 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.53"Subcatchment EX1A: TO WETLAND Tc=6.0 min CN=84 Runoff=3.46 cfs 0.174 af Runoff Area=99,974 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.53"Subcatchment EX1B: TO CREEK Flow Length=326' Tc=11.7 min CN=WQ Runoff=16.19 cfs 1.058 af Runoff Area=25,195 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.53"Subcatchment EX2: TO WESTERN Tc=6.0 min CN=84 Runoff=5.28 cfs 0.267 af Runoff Area=18,258 sf 5.79% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.63"Subcatchment EX3: TO W 78TH ST Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=3.86 cfs 0.196 af Inflow=3.46 cfs 0.174 afReach 1R: EX WETLAND Outflow=3.46 cfs 0.174 af Inflow=18.53 cfs 1.232 afReach 2R: RILEY CREEK Outflow=18.53 cfs 1.232 af Total Runoff Area = 3.671 ac Runoff Volume = 1.695 af Average Runoff Depth = 5.54" 99.34% Pervious = 3.647 ac 0.66% Impervious = 0.024 ac 409 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 33HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX1A: TO WETLAND Runoff = 3.46 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.174 af, Depth= 5.53" Routed to Reach 1R : EX WETLAND Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Area (sf) CN Description * 16,477 84 PERVIOUS 16,477 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX1A: TO WETLAND Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)3 2 1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Runoff Area=16,477 sf Runoff Volume=0.174 af Runoff Depth=5.53" Tc=6.0 min CN=84 3.46 cfs 410 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 34HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment EX1A: TO WETLAND Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.79 0.07 0.04 15.00 6.96 5.11 0.12 20.00 7.29 5.41 0.01 25.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 30.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 35.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 40.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 45.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 50.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 55.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 60.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 65.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 70.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 75.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 80.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 85.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 90.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 95.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 100.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 105.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 110.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 115.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 120.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 125.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 130.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 135.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 140.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 145.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 150.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 155.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 160.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 165.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 170.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 175.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 180.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 185.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 190.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 195.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 200.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 205.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 210.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 215.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 220.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 225.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 230.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 235.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 240.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 411 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 35HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX1B: TO CREEK Runoff = 16.19 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 1.058 af, Depth= 5.53" Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Area (sf) CN Description * 0 98 * 99,974 84 PERVIOUS 99,974 Weighted Average 99,974 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 9.1 100 0.0690 0.18 Sheet Flow, SF Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.94" 2.6 226 0.0440 1.47 Shallow Concentrated Flow, SCF Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 11.7 326 Total Subcatchment EX1B: TO CREEK Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Runoff Area=99,974 sf Runoff Volume=1.058 af Runoff Depth=5.53" Flow Length=326' Tc=11.7 min CN=WQ 16.19 cfs 412 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 36HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment EX1B: TO CREEK Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.79 0.07 0.22 15.00 6.96 5.11 0.75 20.00 7.29 5.41 0.07 25.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 30.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 35.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 40.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 45.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 50.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 55.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 60.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 65.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 70.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 75.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 80.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 85.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 90.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 95.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 100.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 105.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 110.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 115.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 120.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 125.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 130.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 135.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 140.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 145.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 150.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 155.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 160.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 165.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 170.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 175.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 180.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 185.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 190.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 195.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 200.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 205.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 210.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 215.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 220.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 225.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 230.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 235.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 240.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 413 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 37HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Runoff = 5.28 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.267 af, Depth= 5.53" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Area (sf) CN Description 25,195 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 25,195 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)5 4 3 2 1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Runoff Area=25,195 sf Runoff Volume=0.267 af Runoff Depth=5.53" Tc=6.0 min CN=84 5.28 cfs 414 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 38HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment EX2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.79 0.07 0.06 15.00 6.96 5.11 0.19 20.00 7.29 5.41 0.02 25.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 30.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 35.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 40.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 45.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 50.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 55.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 60.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 65.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 70.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 75.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 80.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 85.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 90.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 95.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 100.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 105.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 110.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 115.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 120.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 125.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 130.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 135.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 140.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 145.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 150.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 155.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 160.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 165.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 170.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 175.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 180.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 185.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 190.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 195.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 200.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 205.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 210.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 215.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 220.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 225.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 230.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 235.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 240.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 415 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 39HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX3: TO W 78TH ST Runoff = 3.86 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.196 af, Depth= 5.63" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Area (sf) CN Description 1,058 98 Paved parking, HSG D 17,200 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 18,258 Weighted Average 17,200 94.21% Pervious Area 1,058 5.79% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX3: TO W 78TH ST Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)4 3 2 1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Runoff Area=18,258 sf Runoff Volume=0.196 af Runoff Depth=5.63" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 3.86 cfs 416 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 40HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment EX3: TO W 78TH ST Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.79 0.09 0.05 15.00 6.96 5.22 0.14 20.00 7.29 5.53 0.01 25.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 30.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 35.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 40.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 45.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 50.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 55.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 60.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 65.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 70.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 75.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 80.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 85.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 90.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 95.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 100.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 105.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 110.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 115.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 120.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 125.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 130.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 135.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 140.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 145.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 150.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 155.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 160.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 165.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 170.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 175.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 180.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 185.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 190.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 195.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 200.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 205.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 210.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 215.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 220.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 225.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 230.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 235.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 240.00 7.41 5.65 0.00 417 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 41HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 1R: EX WETLAND [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.378 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.53" for 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 event Inflow = 3.46 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.174 af Outflow = 3.46 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.174 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 1R: EX WETLAND Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=0.378 ac 3.46 cfs 3.46 cfs 418 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 42HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Reach 1R: EX WETLAND Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.04 0.04 15.00 0.12 0.12 20.00 0.01 0.01 25.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 85.00 0.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 105.00 0.00 0.00 110.00 0.00 0.00 115.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0.00 130.00 0.00 0.00 135.00 0.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 0.00 145.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 0.00 155.00 0.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 0.00 165.00 0.00 0.00 170.00 0.00 0.00 175.00 0.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 0.00 185.00 0.00 0.00 190.00 0.00 0.00 195.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 205.00 0.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 0.00 215.00 0.00 0.00 220.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 0.00 0.00 235.00 0.00 0.00 240.00 0.00 0.00 419 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 43HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.673 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.53" for 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 event Inflow = 18.53 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 1.232 af Outflow = 18.53 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 1.232 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=2.673 ac 18.53 cfs 18.53 cfs 420 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 44HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.26 0.26 15.00 0.87 0.87 20.00 0.08 0.08 25.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 85.00 0.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 105.00 0.00 0.00 110.00 0.00 0.00 115.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0.00 130.00 0.00 0.00 135.00 0.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 0.00 145.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 0.00 155.00 0.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 0.00 165.00 0.00 0.00 170.00 0.00 0.00 175.00 0.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 0.00 185.00 0.00 0.00 190.00 0.00 0.00 195.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 205.00 0.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 0.00 215.00 0.00 0.00 220.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 0.00 0.00 235.00 0.00 0.00 240.00 0.00 0.00 421 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 45HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=16,477 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.33"Subcatchment EX1A: TO WETLAND Tc=6.0 min CN=84 Runoff=0.06 cfs 0.168 af Runoff Area=99,974 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.33"Subcatchment EX1B: TO CREEK Flow Length=326' Tc=11.7 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.38 cfs 1.019 af Runoff Area=25,195 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.33"Subcatchment EX2: TO WESTERN Tc=6.0 min CN=84 Runoff=0.10 cfs 0.257 af Runoff Area=18,258 sf 5.79% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.42"Subcatchment EX3: TO W 78TH ST Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.07 cfs 0.189 af Inflow=0.06 cfs 0.168 afReach 1R: EX WETLAND Outflow=0.06 cfs 0.168 af Inflow=0.44 cfs 1.187 afReach 2R: RILEY CREEK Outflow=0.44 cfs 1.187 af Total Runoff Area = 3.671 ac Runoff Volume = 1.633 af Average Runoff Depth = 5.34" 99.34% Pervious = 3.647 ac 0.66% Impervious = 0.024 ac 422 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 46HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX1A: TO WETLAND Runoff = 0.06 cfs @ 121.26 hrs, Volume= 0.168 af, Depth> 5.33" Routed to Reach 1R : EX WETLAND Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20" Area (sf) CN Description * 16,477 84 PERVIOUS 16,477 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX1A: TO WETLAND Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20" Runoff Area=16,477 sf Runoff Volume=0.168 af Runoff Depth>5.33" Tc=6.0 min CN=84 0.06 cfs 423 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 47HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment EX1A: TO WETLAND Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 25.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.56 0.02 0.00 40.00 0.66 0.04 0.00 45.00 0.76 0.06 0.00 50.00 0.86 0.10 0.00 55.00 0.97 0.14 0.00 60.00 1.08 0.19 0.00 65.00 1.19 0.24 0.00 70.00 1.31 0.31 0.01 75.00 1.44 0.38 0.01 80.00 1.57 0.46 0.01 85.00 1.71 0.54 0.01 90.00 1.86 0.65 0.01 95.00 2.03 0.76 0.01 100.00 2.20 0.89 0.01 105.00 2.40 1.04 0.01 110.00 2.65 1.23 0.02 115.00 2.94 1.46 0.02 120.00 3.53 1.96 0.06 125.00 4.27 2.61 0.03 130.00 4.62 2.93 0.02 135.00 4.87 3.15 0.02 140.00 5.06 3.33 0.01 145.00 5.23 3.48 0.01 150.00 5.39 3.63 0.01 155.00 5.53 3.76 0.01 160.00 5.67 3.89 0.01 165.00 5.80 4.01 0.01 170.00 5.92 4.12 0.01 175.00 6.03 4.23 0.01 180.00 6.14 4.33 0.01 185.00 6.25 4.43 0.01 190.00 6.36 4.53 0.01 195.00 6.46 4.63 0.01 200.00 6.55 4.72 0.01 205.00 6.65 4.81 0.01 210.00 6.74 4.89 0.01 215.00 6.82 4.97 0.01 220.00 6.91 5.05 0.01 225.00 6.98 5.13 0.01 230.00 7.06 5.20 0.01 235.00 7.13 5.27 0.01 240.00 7.20 5.33 0.00 424 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 48HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX1B: TO CREEK Runoff = 0.38 cfs @ 121.33 hrs, Volume= 1.019 af, Depth> 5.33" Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20" Area (sf) CN Description * 0 98 * 99,974 84 PERVIOUS 99,974 Weighted Average 99,974 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 9.1 100 0.0690 0.18 Sheet Flow, SF Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.94" 2.6 226 0.0440 1.47 Shallow Concentrated Flow, SCF Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 11.7 326 Total Subcatchment EX1B: TO CREEK Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.42 0.4 0.38 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20" Runoff Area=99,974 sf Runoff Volume=1.019 af Runoff Depth>5.33" Flow Length=326' Tc=11.7 min CN=WQ 0.38 cfs 425 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 49HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment EX1B: TO CREEK Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 25.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.56 0.02 0.01 40.00 0.66 0.04 0.01 45.00 0.76 0.06 0.01 50.00 0.86 0.10 0.02 55.00 0.97 0.14 0.02 60.00 1.08 0.19 0.02 65.00 1.19 0.24 0.03 70.00 1.31 0.31 0.03 75.00 1.44 0.38 0.03 80.00 1.57 0.46 0.04 85.00 1.71 0.54 0.04 90.00 1.86 0.65 0.05 95.00 2.03 0.76 0.06 100.00 2.20 0.89 0.06 105.00 2.40 1.04 0.08 110.00 2.65 1.23 0.09 115.00 2.94 1.46 0.13 120.00 3.53 1.96 0.34 125.00 4.27 2.61 0.20 130.00 4.62 2.93 0.12 135.00 4.87 3.15 0.09 140.00 5.06 3.33 0.08 145.00 5.23 3.48 0.07 150.00 5.39 3.63 0.06 155.00 5.53 3.76 0.06 160.00 5.67 3.89 0.06 165.00 5.80 4.01 0.05 170.00 5.92 4.12 0.05 175.00 6.03 4.23 0.05 180.00 6.14 4.33 0.05 185.00 6.25 4.43 0.05 190.00 6.36 4.53 0.05 195.00 6.46 4.63 0.04 200.00 6.55 4.72 0.04 205.00 6.65 4.81 0.04 210.00 6.74 4.89 0.04 215.00 6.82 4.97 0.04 220.00 6.91 5.05 0.04 225.00 6.98 5.13 0.03 230.00 7.06 5.20 0.03 235.00 7.13 5.27 0.03 240.00 7.20 5.33 0.03 426 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 50HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Runoff = 0.10 cfs @ 121.26 hrs, Volume= 0.257 af, Depth> 5.33" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20" Area (sf) CN Description 25,195 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 25,195 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.105 0.1 0.095 0.09 0.085 0.08 0.075 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20" Runoff Area=25,195 sf Runoff Volume=0.257 af Runoff Depth>5.33" Tc=6.0 min CN=84 0.10 cfs 427 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 51HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment EX2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 25.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.56 0.02 0.00 40.00 0.66 0.04 0.00 45.00 0.76 0.06 0.00 50.00 0.86 0.10 0.00 55.00 0.97 0.14 0.01 60.00 1.08 0.19 0.01 65.00 1.19 0.24 0.01 70.00 1.31 0.31 0.01 75.00 1.44 0.38 0.01 80.00 1.57 0.46 0.01 85.00 1.71 0.54 0.01 90.00 1.86 0.65 0.01 95.00 2.03 0.76 0.01 100.00 2.20 0.89 0.02 105.00 2.40 1.04 0.02 110.00 2.65 1.23 0.02 115.00 2.94 1.46 0.03 120.00 3.53 1.96 0.09 125.00 4.27 2.61 0.05 130.00 4.62 2.93 0.03 135.00 4.87 3.15 0.02 140.00 5.06 3.33 0.02 145.00 5.23 3.48 0.02 150.00 5.39 3.63 0.02 155.00 5.53 3.76 0.02 160.00 5.67 3.89 0.01 165.00 5.80 4.01 0.01 170.00 5.92 4.12 0.01 175.00 6.03 4.23 0.01 180.00 6.14 4.33 0.01 185.00 6.25 4.43 0.01 190.00 6.36 4.53 0.01 195.00 6.46 4.63 0.01 200.00 6.55 4.72 0.01 205.00 6.65 4.81 0.01 210.00 6.74 4.89 0.01 215.00 6.82 4.97 0.01 220.00 6.91 5.05 0.01 225.00 6.98 5.13 0.01 230.00 7.06 5.20 0.01 235.00 7.13 5.27 0.01 240.00 7.20 5.33 0.01 428 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 52HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment EX3: TO W 78TH ST Runoff = 0.07 cfs @ 121.26 hrs, Volume= 0.189 af, Depth> 5.42" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20" Area (sf) CN Description 1,058 98 Paved parking, HSG D 17,200 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 18,258 Weighted Average 17,200 94.21% Pervious Area 1,058 5.79% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX3: TO W 78TH ST Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.075 0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20" Runoff Area=18,258 sf Runoff Volume=0.189 af Runoff Depth>5.42" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 0.07 cfs 429 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 53HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment EX3: TO W 78TH ST Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 25.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.46 0.01 0.00 35.00 0.56 0.02 0.00 40.00 0.66 0.04 0.00 45.00 0.76 0.08 0.00 50.00 0.86 0.11 0.00 55.00 0.97 0.16 0.00 60.00 1.08 0.21 0.00 65.00 1.19 0.27 0.01 70.00 1.31 0.34 0.01 75.00 1.44 0.41 0.01 80.00 1.57 0.50 0.01 85.00 1.71 0.59 0.01 90.00 1.86 0.69 0.01 95.00 2.03 0.81 0.01 100.00 2.20 0.94 0.01 105.00 2.40 1.10 0.01 110.00 2.65 1.30 0.02 115.00 2.94 1.53 0.02 120.00 3.53 2.04 0.06 125.00 4.27 2.70 0.04 130.00 4.62 3.02 0.02 135.00 4.87 3.25 0.02 140.00 5.06 3.43 0.01 145.00 5.23 3.58 0.01 150.00 5.39 3.73 0.01 155.00 5.53 3.86 0.01 160.00 5.67 3.99 0.01 165.00 5.80 4.11 0.01 170.00 5.92 4.23 0.01 175.00 6.03 4.34 0.01 180.00 6.14 4.44 0.01 185.00 6.25 4.54 0.01 190.00 6.36 4.64 0.01 195.00 6.46 4.74 0.01 200.00 6.55 4.83 0.01 205.00 6.65 4.92 0.01 210.00 6.74 5.00 0.01 215.00 6.82 5.08 0.01 220.00 6.91 5.16 0.01 225.00 6.98 5.24 0.01 230.00 7.06 5.31 0.01 235.00 7.13 5.38 0.01 240.00 7.20 5.44 0.00 430 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 54HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 1R: EX WETLAND [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.378 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.33" for MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr event Inflow = 0.06 cfs @ 121.26 hrs, Volume= 0.168 af Outflow = 0.06 cfs @ 121.26 hrs, Volume= 0.168 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 1R: EX WETLAND Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.07 0.065 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 Inflow Area=0.378 ac 0.06 cfs 0.06 cfs 431 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 55HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Reach 1R: EX WETLAND Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 0.01 0.01 75.00 0.01 0.01 80.00 0.01 0.01 85.00 0.01 0.01 90.00 0.01 0.01 95.00 0.01 0.01 100.00 0.01 0.01 105.00 0.01 0.01 110.00 0.02 0.02 115.00 0.02 0.02 120.00 0.06 0.06 125.00 0.03 0.03 130.00 0.02 0.02 135.00 0.02 0.02 140.00 0.01 0.01 145.00 0.01 0.01 150.00 0.01 0.01 155.00 0.01 0.01 160.00 0.01 0.01 165.00 0.01 0.01 170.00 0.01 0.01 175.00 0.01 0.01 180.00 0.01 0.01 185.00 0.01 0.01 190.00 0.01 0.01 195.00 0.01 0.01 200.00 0.01 0.01 205.00 0.01 0.01 210.00 0.01 0.01 215.00 0.01 0.01 220.00 0.01 0.01 225.00 0.01 0.01 230.00 0.01 0.01 235.00 0.01 0.01 240.00 0.00 0.00 432 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 56HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.673 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.33" for MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr event Inflow = 0.44 cfs @ 121.30 hrs, Volume= 1.187 af Outflow = 0.44 cfs @ 121.30 hrs, Volume= 1.187 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.48 0.46 0.44 0.42 0.4 0.38 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 Inflow Area=2.673 ac 0.44 cfs 0.44 cfs 433 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 57HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.01 0.01 40.00 0.01 0.01 45.00 0.02 0.02 50.00 0.02 0.02 55.00 0.02 0.02 60.00 0.03 0.03 65.00 0.03 0.03 70.00 0.04 0.04 75.00 0.04 0.04 80.00 0.04 0.04 85.00 0.05 0.05 90.00 0.06 0.06 95.00 0.07 0.07 100.00 0.07 0.07 105.00 0.09 0.09 110.00 0.11 0.11 115.00 0.15 0.15 120.00 0.40 0.40 125.00 0.24 0.24 130.00 0.14 0.14 135.00 0.11 0.11 140.00 0.09 0.09 145.00 0.08 0.08 150.00 0.08 0.08 155.00 0.07 0.07 160.00 0.07 0.07 165.00 0.06 0.06 170.00 0.06 0.06 175.00 0.06 0.06 180.00 0.05 0.05 185.00 0.05 0.05 190.00 0.05 0.05 195.00 0.05 0.05 200.00 0.05 0.05 205.00 0.05 0.05 210.00 0.04 0.04 215.00 0.04 0.04 220.00 0.04 0.04 225.00 0.04 0.04 230.00 0.04 0.04 235.00 0.04 0.04 240.00 0.03 0.03 434 Table of Contents25102 EXISTING Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Reports 1 Routing Diagram 2 Rainfall Events Listing (selected events) 3 Area Listing (all nodes) 4 Soil Listing (all nodes) 5 Ground Covers (all nodes) 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Event 6 Node Listing 7 Subcat EX1A: TO WETLAND 9 Subcat EX1B: TO CREEK 11 Subcat EX2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY 13 Subcat EX3: TO W 78TH ST 15 Reach 1R: EX WETLAND 17 Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Event 19 Node Listing 20 Subcat EX1A: TO WETLAND 22 Subcat EX1B: TO CREEK 24 Subcat EX2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY 26 Subcat EX3: TO W 78TH ST 28 Reach 1R: EX WETLAND 30 Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Event 32 Node Listing 33 Subcat EX1A: TO WETLAND 35 Subcat EX1B: TO CREEK 37 Subcat EX2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY 39 Subcat EX3: TO W 78TH ST 41 Reach 1R: EX WETLAND 43 Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Event 45 Node Listing 46 Subcat EX1A: TO WETLAND 48 Subcat EX1B: TO CREEK 50 Subcat EX2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY 52 Subcat EX3: TO W 78TH ST 54 Reach 1R: EX WETLAND 56 Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK 435 PROPOSED CONDITIONS PR1A TO WETLAND PR1B TO CREEK PR1C SITE PR1D SITE PR2 TO WESTERN PROPERTY PR3 TO W 78TH ST 1R EX WETLAND 2R RILEY CREEK 1P WATER REUSE STORAGE 2P BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Routing Diagram for 25102 PROPOSED Prepared by Civil Site Group, Printed 5/14/2025 HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Subcat Reach Pond Link 436 25102 PROPOSED Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 2HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Rainfall Events Listing (selected events) Event# Event Name Storm Type Curve Mode 1 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24h r 2 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24h r 3 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100 y 24h r 4 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr 437 25102 PROPOSED Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 3HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (all nodes) Area (acres) CN Description (subcatchment-numbers) 0.207 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D (PR2) 1.624 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D (PR1C, PR1D, PR3) 1.451 84 PERVIOUS (PR1A, PR1B) 0.347 98 Paved parking, HSG D (PR1C, PR3) 0.011 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG D (PR1B) 0.007 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG D (PR1A) 3.647 84 TOTAL AREA 438 25102 PROPOSED Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 4HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Soil Listing (all nodes) Area (acres) Soil Group Subcatchment Numbers 0.000 HSG A 0.000 HSG B 0.000 HSG C 2.196 HSG D PR1A, PR1B, PR1C, PR1D, PR2, PR3 1.451 Other PR1A, PR1B 3.647 TOTAL AREA 439 25102 PROPOSED Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 5HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG-A (acres) HSG-B (acres) HSG-C (acres) HSG-D (acres) Other (acres) Total (acres) Ground Cover Subcatchment Numbers 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.207 0.000 0.207 50-75% Grass cover, Fair PR2 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.624 0.000 1.624 >75% Grass cover, Good PR1C, PR1D, PR3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.451 1.451 PERVIOUS PR1A, PR1B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.347 0.000 0.347 Paved parking PR1C, PR3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.011 0.000 0.011 Unconnected pavement PR1B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.007 0.000 0.007 Unconnected roofs PR1A 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.196 1.451 3.647 TOTAL AREA 440 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 6HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=11,039 sf 2.74% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.44"Subcatchment PR1A: TO WETLAND Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.65 cfs 0.030 af Runoff Area=52,918 sf 0.89% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.42"Subcatchment PR1B: TO CREEK Flow Length=293' Tc=11.5 min CN=WQ Runoff=2.37 cfs 0.144 af Runoff Area=66,320 sf 17.47% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.41"Subcatchment PR1C: SITE Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=3.66 cfs 0.179 af Runoff Area=13,349 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.15"Subcatchment PR1D: SITE Tc=6.0 min CN=80 Runoff=0.62 cfs 0.029 af Runoff Area=9,022 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.41"Subcatchment PR2: TO WESTERN Tc=6.0 min CN=84 Runoff=0.52 cfs 0.024 af Runoff Area=6,198 sf 57.15% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.00"Subcatchment PR3: TO W 78TH ST Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.47 cfs 0.024 af Inflow=0.65 cfs 0.030 afReach 1R: EX WETLAND Outflow=0.65 cfs 0.030 af Inflow=2.88 cfs 0.383 afReach 2R: RILEY CREEK Outflow=2.88 cfs 0.383 af Peak Elev=959.67' Storage=6,087 cf Inflow=3.66 cfs 0.179 afPond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE 24.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=50.0' S=0.0200 '/' Outflow=2.96 cfs 0.179 af Peak Elev=952.65' Storage=5,570 cf Inflow=3.49 cfs 0.209 afPond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Primary=0.17 cfs 0.209 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=0.17 cfs 0.209 af Total Runoff Area = 3.647 ac Runoff Volume = 0.431 af Average Runoff Depth = 1.42" 89.99% Pervious = 3.282 ac 10.01% Impervious = 0.365 ac 441 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 7HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1A: TO WETLAND Runoff = 0.65 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.030 af, Depth= 1.44" Routed to Reach 1R : EX WETLAND Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description * 10,736 84 PERVIOUS 303 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG D 11,039 Weighted Average 10,736 97.26% Pervious Area 303 2.74% Impervious Area 303 100.00% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1A: TO WETLAND Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=11,039 sf Runoff Volume=0.030 af Runoff Depth=1.44" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 0.65 cfs 442 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 8HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR1A: TO WETLAND Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 15.00 2.54 1.15 0.02 20.00 2.76 1.32 0.01 25.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 30.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 35.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 40.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 45.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 50.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 55.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 60.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 65.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 70.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 75.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 80.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 85.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 90.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 95.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 100.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 105.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 110.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 115.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 120.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 125.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 130.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 135.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 140.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 145.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 150.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 155.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 160.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 165.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 170.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 175.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 180.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 185.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 190.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 195.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 200.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 205.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 210.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 215.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 220.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 225.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 230.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 235.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 240.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 443 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 9HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1B: TO CREEK Runoff = 2.37 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.144 af, Depth= 1.42" Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description 469 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG D * 52,449 84 PERVIOUS 52,918 Weighted Average 52,449 99.11% Pervious Area 469 0.89% Impervious Area 469 100.00% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 9.0 100 0.0710 0.19 Sheet Flow, SF Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.94" 2.5 193 0.0660 1.28 Shallow Concentrated Flow, SCF Woodland Kv= 5.0 fps 11.5 293 Total Subcatchment PR1B: TO CREEK Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)2 1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=52,918 sf Runoff Volume=0.144 af Runoff Depth=1.42" Flow Length=293' Tc=11.5 min CN=WQ 2.37 cfs 444 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 10HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR1B: TO CREEK Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.43 0.00 0.01 15.00 2.54 1.15 0.10 20.00 2.76 1.32 0.03 25.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 30.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 35.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 40.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 45.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 50.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 55.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 60.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 65.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 70.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 75.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 80.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 85.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 90.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 95.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 100.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 105.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 110.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 115.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 120.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 125.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 130.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 135.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 140.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 145.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 150.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 155.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 160.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 165.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 170.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 175.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 180.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 185.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 190.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 195.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 200.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 205.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 210.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 215.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 220.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 225.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 230.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 235.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 240.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 445 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 11HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1C: SITE Runoff = 3.66 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.179 af, Depth= 1.41" Routed to Pond 1P : WATER REUSE STORAGE Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description 54,737 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 11,583 98 Paved parking, HSG D 66,320 Weighted Average 54,737 82.53% Pervious Area 11,583 17.47% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1C: SITE Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)4 3 2 1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=66,320 sf Runoff Volume=0.179 af Runoff Depth=1.41" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 3.66 cfs 446 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 12HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR1C: SITE Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.43 0.00 0.03 15.00 2.54 1.09 0.12 20.00 2.76 1.25 0.03 25.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 30.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 35.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 40.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 45.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 50.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 55.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 60.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 65.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 70.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 75.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 80.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 85.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 90.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 95.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 100.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 105.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 110.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 115.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 120.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 125.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 130.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 135.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 140.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 145.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 150.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 155.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 160.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 165.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 170.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 175.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 180.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 185.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 190.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 195.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 200.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 205.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 210.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 215.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 220.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 225.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 230.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 235.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 240.00 2.87 1.34 0.00 447 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 13HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1D: SITE Runoff = 0.62 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.029 af, Depth= 1.15" Routed to Pond 2P : BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description 13,349 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 13,349 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1D: SITE Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=13,349 sf Runoff Volume=0.029 af Runoff Depth=1.15" Tc=6.0 min CN=80 0.62 cfs 448 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 14HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR1D: SITE Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 15.00 2.54 0.92 0.02 20.00 2.76 1.07 0.01 25.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 30.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 35.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 40.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 45.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 50.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 55.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 60.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 65.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 70.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 75.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 80.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 85.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 90.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 95.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 100.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 105.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 110.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 115.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 120.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 125.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 130.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 135.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 140.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 145.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 150.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 155.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 160.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 165.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 170.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 175.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 180.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 185.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 190.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 195.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 200.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 205.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 210.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 215.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 220.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 225.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 230.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 235.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 240.00 2.87 1.15 0.00 449 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 15HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Runoff = 0.52 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.024 af, Depth= 1.41" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description 9,022 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 9,022 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=9,022 sf Runoff Volume=0.024 af Runoff Depth=1.41" Tc=6.0 min CN=84 0.52 cfs 450 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 16HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 15.00 2.54 1.15 0.02 20.00 2.76 1.32 0.00 25.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 30.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 35.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 40.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 45.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 50.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 55.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 60.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 65.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 70.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 75.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 80.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 85.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 90.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 95.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 100.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 105.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 110.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 115.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 120.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 125.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 130.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 135.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 140.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 145.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 150.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 155.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 160.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 165.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 170.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 175.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 180.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 185.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 190.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 195.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 200.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 205.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 210.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 215.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 220.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 225.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 230.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 235.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 240.00 2.87 1.41 0.00 451 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 17HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR3: TO W 78TH ST Runoff = 0.47 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.024 af, Depth= 2.00" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description 2,656 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 3,542 98 Paved parking, HSG D 6,198 Weighted Average 2,656 42.85% Pervious Area 3,542 57.15% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR3: TO W 78TH ST Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.52 0.5 0.48 0.46 0.44 0.42 0.4 0.38 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=6,198 sf Runoff Volume=0.024 af Runoff Depth=2.00" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 0.47 cfs 452 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 18HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR3: TO W 78TH ST Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.43 0.03 0.01 15.00 2.54 1.57 0.01 20.00 2.76 1.76 0.00 25.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 30.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 35.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 40.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 45.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 50.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 55.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 60.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 65.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 70.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 75.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 80.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 85.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 90.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 95.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 100.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 105.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 110.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 115.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 120.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 125.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 130.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 135.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 140.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 145.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 150.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 155.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 160.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 165.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 170.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 175.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 180.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 185.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 190.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 195.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 200.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 205.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 210.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 215.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 220.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 225.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 230.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 235.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 240.00 2.87 1.87 0.00 453 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 19HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 1R: EX WETLAND [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.253 ac, 2.74% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.44" for 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 event Inflow = 0.65 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.030 af Outflow = 0.65 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.030 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 1R: EX WETLAND Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 Inflow Area=0.253 ac 0.65 cfs 0.65 cfs 454 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 20HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Reach 1R: EX WETLAND Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.02 0.02 20.00 0.01 0.01 25.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 85.00 0.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 105.00 0.00 0.00 110.00 0.00 0.00 115.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0.00 130.00 0.00 0.00 135.00 0.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 0.00 145.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 0.00 155.00 0.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 0.00 165.00 0.00 0.00 170.00 0.00 0.00 175.00 0.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 0.00 185.00 0.00 0.00 190.00 0.00 0.00 195.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 205.00 0.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 0.00 215.00 0.00 0.00 220.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 0.00 0.00 235.00 0.00 0.00 240.00 0.00 0.00 455 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 21HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 3.297 ac, 8.60% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.39" for 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 event Inflow = 2.88 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.383 af Outflow = 2.88 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.383 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=3.297 ac 2.88 cfs 2.88 cfs 456 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 22HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.02 0.02 15.00 0.28 0.28 20.00 0.11 0.11 25.00 0.07 0.07 30.00 0.07 0.07 35.00 0.06 0.06 40.00 0.06 0.06 45.00 0.02 0.02 50.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 85.00 0.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 105.00 0.00 0.00 110.00 0.00 0.00 115.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0.00 130.00 0.00 0.00 135.00 0.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 0.00 145.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 0.00 155.00 0.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 0.00 165.00 0.00 0.00 170.00 0.00 0.00 175.00 0.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 0.00 185.00 0.00 0.00 190.00 0.00 0.00 195.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 205.00 0.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 0.00 215.00 0.00 0.00 220.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 0.00 0.00 235.00 0.00 0.00 240.00 0.00 0.00 457 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 23HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE Inflow Area = 1.522 ac, 17.47% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.41" for 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 event Inflow = 3.66 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.179 af Outflow = 2.96 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.179 af, Atten= 19%, Lag= 2.7 min Primary = 2.96 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.179 af Routed to Pond 2P : BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Automatic Starting Elev= 958.95' Surf.Area= 2,354 sf Storage= 5,030 cf Peak Elev= 959.67' @ 12.13 hrs Surf.Area= 2,354 sf Storage= 6,087 cf (1,056 cf above start) Plug-Flow detention time= 333.1 min calculated for 0.064 af (36% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 24.6 min ( 831.8 - 807.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 954.80' 0 cf 32.25'W x 73.00'L x 6.50'H Field A 15,303 cf Overall - 7,139 cf Embedded = 8,163 cf x 0.0% Voids #2A 955.30' 7,139 cf CMP Round 66 x 12 Inside #1 Effective Size= 66.0"W x 66.0"H => 23.76 sf x 20.00'L = 475.2 cf Overall Size= 66.0"W x 66.0"H x 20.00'L 12 Chambers in 4 Rows 30.25' Header x 23.76 sf x 2 = 1,437.4 cf Inside 7,139 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 958.95'24.0" Round Culvert L= 50.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 958.95' / 957.95' S= 0.0200 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 3.14 sf Primary OutFlow Max=2.96 cfs @ 12.13 hrs HW=959.67' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 2.96 cfs @ 2.89 fps) 458 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 24HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = CMP Round 66 (Round Corrugated Metal Pipe) Effective Size= 66.0"W x 66.0"H => 23.76 sf x 20.00'L = 475.2 cf Overall Size= 66.0"W x 66.0"H x 20.00'L 66.0" Wide + 33.0" Spacing = 99.0" C-C Row Spacing 3 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +5.50' Header x 2 = 71.00' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 73.00' Base Length 4 Rows x 66.0" Wide + 33.0" Spacing x 3 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 32.25' Base Width 6.0" Stone Base + 66.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Stone Cover = 6.50' Field Height 12 Chambers x 475.2 cf + 30.25' Header x 23.76 sf x 2 = 7,139.4 cf Chamber Storage 15,302.6 cf Field - 7,139.4 cf Chambers = 8,163.3 cf Stone x 0.0% Voids = 0.0 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage = 7,139.4 cf = 0.164 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 46.7% Overall System Size = 73.00' x 32.25' x 6.50' 12 Chambers 566.8 cy Field 302.3 cy Stone 459 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 25HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=1.522 ac Peak Elev=959.67' Storage=6,087 cf 24.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=50.0' S=0.0200 '/' 3.66 cfs 2.96 cfs Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE Primary Stage-Discharge Discharge (cfs) 1614121086420Elevation (feet)961 960 959 958 957 956 955 Culvert 460 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 26HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (cubic-feet) 7,0006,0005,0004,0003,0002,0001,0000Elevation (feet)961 960 959 958 957 956 955 Starting Elevation Field A CMP Round 66 461 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 27HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Storage (cubic-feet) Elevation (feet) Primary (cfs) 0.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 5.00 0.00 5,054 958.97 0.00 10.00 0.03 5,115 959.00 0.02 15.00 0.12 5,246 959.09 0.12 20.00 0.03 5,142 959.02 0.03 25.00 0.00 5,085 958.98 0.01 30.00 0.00 5,044 958.96 0.00 35.00 0.00 5,037 958.95 0.00 40.00 0.00 5,034 958.95 0.00 45.00 0.00 5,032 958.95 0.00 50.00 0.00 5,031 958.95 0.00 55.00 0.00 5,031 958.95 0.00 60.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 65.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 70.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 75.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 80.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 85.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 90.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 95.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 100.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 105.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 110.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 115.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 120.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 125.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 130.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 135.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 140.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 145.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 150.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 155.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 160.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 165.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 170.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 175.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 180.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 185.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 190.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 195.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 200.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 205.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 210.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 215.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 220.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 225.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 230.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 235.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 240.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 462 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 28HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Inflow Area = 1.829 ac, 14.54% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.37" for 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 event Inflow = 3.49 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.209 af Outflow = 0.17 cfs @ 13.86 hrs, Volume= 0.209 af, Atten= 95%, Lag= 104.1 min Primary = 0.17 cfs @ 13.86 hrs, Volume= 0.209 af Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 952.65' @ 13.86 hrs Surf.Area= 4,018 sf Storage= 5,570 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 702.3 min calculated for 0.209 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 702.3 min ( 1,534.0 - 831.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 951.00' 31,458 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 951.00 2,774 0 0 952.00 3,507 3,141 3,141 953.00 4,299 3,903 7,044 954.00 5,149 4,724 11,768 955.00 6,060 5,605 17,372 956.00 7,028 6,544 23,916 957.00 8,056 7,542 31,458 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 949.00'12.0" Round Culvert L= 90.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 949.00' / 947.96' S= 0.0116 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.015 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 949.00'6.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Device 2 951.00'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #4 Device 1 952.50'12.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #5 Secondary 955.25'10.0' long x 3.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Coef. (English) 2.44 2.58 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.68 2.68 2.72 2.81 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=0.17 cfs @ 13.86 hrs HW=952.65' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Passes 0.17 cfs of 5.27 cfs potential flow) 2=Orifice/Grate (Passes 0.07 cfs of 1.74 cfs potential flow) 3=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.07 cfs) 4=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.09 cfs @ 1.30 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=951.00' (Free Discharge) 5=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 463 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 29HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Inflow Outflow Primary Secondary Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=1.829 ac Peak Elev=952.65' Storage=5,570 cf 3.49 cfs 0.17 cfs 0.17 cfs 0.00 cfs Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Total Primary Secondary Stage-Discharge Discharge (cfs) 65605550454035302520151050Elevation (feet)957 956 955 954 953 952 951 Exfiltration Orifice/Grate Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir 464 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 30HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Surface Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (cubic-feet) 30,00028,00026,00024,00022,00020,00018,00016,00014,00012,00010,0008,0006,0004,0002,0000 Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq-ft) 8,0007,5007,0006,5006,0005,5005,0004,5004,0003,5003,0002,5002,0001,5001,0005000 Elevation (feet)957 956 955 954 953 952 951 Custom Stage Data 465 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 2y 24hr 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Rainfall=2.87" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 31HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Storage (cubic-feet) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) Primary (cfs) Secondary (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 3 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.02 48 951.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 15.00 0.15 5,520 952.63 0.15 0.15 0.00 20.00 0.04 4,965 952.49 0.07 0.07 0.00 25.00 0.01 4,329 952.33 0.07 0.07 0.00 30.00 0.00 3,156 952.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 35.00 0.00 2,033 951.67 0.06 0.06 0.00 40.00 0.00 988 951.34 0.06 0.06 0.00 45.00 0.00 70 951.03 0.02 0.02 0.00 50.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 85.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 105.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 110.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 115.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 130.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 135.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 145.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 155.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 165.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 170.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 175.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 185.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 190.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 195.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 205.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 215.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 220.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 235.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 240.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 466 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 32HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=11,039 sf 2.74% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.65"Subcatchment PR1A: TO WETLAND Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=1.22 cfs 0.056 af Runoff Area=52,918 sf 0.89% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.62"Subcatchment PR1B: TO CREEK Flow Length=293' Tc=11.5 min CN=WQ Runoff=4.49 cfs 0.266 af Runoff Area=66,320 sf 17.47% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.58"Subcatchment PR1C: SITE Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=6.93 cfs 0.327 af Runoff Area=13,349 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.27"Subcatchment PR1D: SITE Tc=6.0 min CN=80 Runoff=1.27 cfs 0.058 af Runoff Area=9,022 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.61"Subcatchment PR2: TO WESTERN Tc=6.0 min CN=84 Runoff=0.99 cfs 0.045 af Runoff Area=6,198 sf 57.15% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.28"Subcatchment PR3: TO W 78TH ST Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.78 cfs 0.039 af Inflow=1.22 cfs 0.056 afReach 1R: EX WETLAND Outflow=1.22 cfs 0.056 af Inflow=5.40 cfs 0.706 afReach 2R: RILEY CREEK Outflow=5.40 cfs 0.706 af Peak Elev=960.03' Storage=6,536 cf Inflow=6.93 cfs 0.327 afPond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE 24.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=50.0' S=0.0200 '/' Outflow=6.16 cfs 0.327 af Peak Elev=953.16' Storage=7,739 cf Inflow=7.31 cfs 0.385 afPond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Primary=1.60 cfs 0.385 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=1.60 cfs 0.385 af Total Runoff Area = 3.647 ac Runoff Volume = 0.790 af Average Runoff Depth = 2.60" 89.99% Pervious = 3.282 ac 10.01% Impervious = 0.365 ac 467 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 33HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1A: TO WETLAND Runoff = 1.22 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.056 af, Depth= 2.65" Routed to Reach 1R : EX WETLAND Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Area (sf) CN Description * 10,736 84 PERVIOUS 303 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG D 11,039 Weighted Average 10,736 97.26% Pervious Area 303 2.74% Impervious Area 303 100.00% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1A: TO WETLAND Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Runoff Area=11,039 sf Runoff Volume=0.056 af Runoff Depth=2.65" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 1.22 cfs 468 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 34HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR1A: TO WETLAND Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.55 0.01 0.01 15.00 3.89 2.27 0.04 20.00 4.17 2.52 0.01 25.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 30.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 35.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 40.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 45.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 50.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 55.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 60.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 65.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 70.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 75.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 80.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 85.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 90.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 95.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 100.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 105.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 110.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 115.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 120.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 125.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 130.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 135.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 140.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 145.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 150.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 155.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 160.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 165.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 170.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 175.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 180.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 185.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 190.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 195.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 200.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 205.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 210.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 215.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 220.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 225.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 230.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 235.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 240.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 469 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 35HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1B: TO CREEK Runoff = 4.49 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.266 af, Depth= 2.62" Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Area (sf) CN Description 469 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG D * 52,449 84 PERVIOUS 52,918 Weighted Average 52,449 99.11% Pervious Area 469 0.89% Impervious Area 469 100.00% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 9.0 100 0.0710 0.19 Sheet Flow, SF Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.94" 2.5 193 0.0660 1.28 Shallow Concentrated Flow, SCF Woodland Kv= 5.0 fps 11.5 293 Total Subcatchment PR1B: TO CREEK Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)5 4 3 2 1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Runoff Area=52,918 sf Runoff Volume=0.266 af Runoff Depth=2.62" Flow Length=293' Tc=11.5 min CN=WQ 4.49 cfs 470 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 36HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR1B: TO CREEK Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.55 0.01 0.03 15.00 3.89 2.27 0.18 20.00 4.17 2.52 0.03 25.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 30.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 35.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 40.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 45.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 50.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 55.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 60.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 65.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 70.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 75.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 80.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 85.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 90.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 95.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 100.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 105.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 110.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 115.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 120.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 125.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 130.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 135.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 140.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 145.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 150.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 155.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 160.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 165.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 170.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 175.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 180.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 185.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 190.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 195.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 200.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 205.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 210.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 215.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 220.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 225.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 230.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 235.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 240.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 471 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 37HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1C: SITE Runoff = 6.93 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.327 af, Depth= 2.58" Routed to Pond 1P : WATER REUSE STORAGE Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Area (sf) CN Description 54,737 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 11,583 98 Paved parking, HSG D 66,320 Weighted Average 54,737 82.53% Pervious Area 11,583 17.47% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1C: SITE Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Runoff Area=66,320 sf Runoff Volume=0.327 af Runoff Depth=2.58" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 6.93 cfs 472 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 38HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR1C: SITE Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.55 0.01 0.05 15.00 3.89 2.19 0.22 20.00 4.17 2.43 0.03 25.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 30.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 35.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 40.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 45.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 50.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 55.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 60.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 65.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 70.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 75.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 80.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 85.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 90.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 95.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 100.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 105.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 110.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 115.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 120.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 125.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 130.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 135.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 140.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 145.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 150.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 155.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 160.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 165.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 170.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 175.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 180.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 185.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 190.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 195.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 200.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 205.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 210.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 215.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 220.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 225.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 230.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 235.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 240.00 4.27 2.52 0.00 473 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 39HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1D: SITE Runoff = 1.27 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.058 af, Depth= 2.27" Routed to Pond 2P : BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Area (sf) CN Description 13,349 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 13,349 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1D: SITE Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Runoff Area=13,349 sf Runoff Volume=0.058 af Runoff Depth=2.27" Tc=6.0 min CN=80 1.27 cfs 474 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 40HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR1D: SITE Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.55 0.00 0.00 15.00 3.89 1.95 0.04 20.00 4.17 2.18 0.01 25.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 30.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 35.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 40.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 45.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 50.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 55.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 60.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 65.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 70.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 75.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 80.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 85.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 90.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 95.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 100.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 105.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 110.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 115.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 120.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 125.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 130.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 135.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 140.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 145.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 150.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 155.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 160.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 165.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 170.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 175.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 180.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 185.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 190.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 195.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 200.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 205.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 210.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 215.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 220.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 225.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 230.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 235.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 240.00 4.27 2.27 0.00 475 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 41HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Runoff = 0.99 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.045 af, Depth= 2.61" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Area (sf) CN Description 9,022 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 9,022 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Runoff Area=9,022 sf Runoff Volume=0.045 af Runoff Depth=2.61" Tc=6.0 min CN=84 0.99 cfs 476 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 42HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.55 0.01 0.01 15.00 3.89 2.27 0.03 20.00 4.17 2.52 0.00 25.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 30.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 35.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 40.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 45.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 50.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 55.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 60.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 65.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 70.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 75.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 80.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 85.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 90.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 95.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 100.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 105.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 110.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 115.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 120.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 125.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 130.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 135.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 140.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 145.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 150.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 155.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 160.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 165.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 170.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 175.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 180.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 185.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 190.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 195.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 200.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 205.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 210.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 215.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 220.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 225.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 230.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 235.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 240.00 4.27 2.61 0.00 477 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 43HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR3: TO W 78TH ST Runoff = 0.78 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.039 af, Depth= 3.28" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Area (sf) CN Description 2,656 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 3,542 98 Paved parking, HSG D 6,198 Weighted Average 2,656 42.85% Pervious Area 3,542 57.15% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR3: TO W 78TH ST Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.85 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Runoff Area=6,198 sf Runoff Volume=0.039 af Runoff Depth=3.28" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 0.78 cfs 478 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 44HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR3: TO W 78TH ST Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.55 0.07 0.01 15.00 3.89 2.81 0.02 20.00 4.17 3.08 0.00 25.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 30.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 35.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 40.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 45.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 50.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 55.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 60.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 65.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 70.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 75.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 80.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 85.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 90.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 95.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 100.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 105.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 110.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 115.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 120.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 125.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 130.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 135.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 140.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 145.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 150.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 155.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 160.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 165.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 170.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 175.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 180.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 185.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 190.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 195.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 200.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 205.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 210.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 215.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 220.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 225.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 230.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 235.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 240.00 4.27 3.18 0.00 479 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 45HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 1R: EX WETLAND [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.253 ac, 2.74% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.65" for 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 event Inflow = 1.22 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.056 af Outflow = 1.22 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.056 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 1R: EX WETLAND Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)1 0 Inflow Area=0.253 ac 1.22 cfs 1.22 cfs 480 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 46HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Reach 1R: EX WETLAND Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.01 0.01 15.00 0.04 0.04 20.00 0.01 0.01 25.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 85.00 0.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 105.00 0.00 0.00 110.00 0.00 0.00 115.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0.00 130.00 0.00 0.00 135.00 0.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 0.00 145.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 0.00 155.00 0.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 0.00 165.00 0.00 0.00 170.00 0.00 0.00 175.00 0.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 0.00 185.00 0.00 0.00 190.00 0.00 0.00 195.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 205.00 0.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 0.00 215.00 0.00 0.00 220.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 0.00 0.00 235.00 0.00 0.00 240.00 0.00 0.00 481 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 47HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 3.297 ac, 8.60% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.57" for 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 event Inflow = 5.40 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.706 af Outflow = 5.40 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.706 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=3.297 ac 5.40 cfs 5.40 cfs 482 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 48HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.06 0.06 15.00 0.52 0.52 20.00 0.11 0.11 25.00 0.07 0.07 30.00 0.07 0.07 35.00 0.06 0.06 40.00 0.06 0.06 45.00 0.04 0.04 50.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 85.00 0.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 105.00 0.00 0.00 110.00 0.00 0.00 115.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0.00 130.00 0.00 0.00 135.00 0.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 0.00 145.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 0.00 155.00 0.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 0.00 165.00 0.00 0.00 170.00 0.00 0.00 175.00 0.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 0.00 185.00 0.00 0.00 190.00 0.00 0.00 195.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 205.00 0.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 0.00 215.00 0.00 0.00 220.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 0.00 0.00 235.00 0.00 0.00 240.00 0.00 0.00 483 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 49HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE Inflow Area = 1.522 ac, 17.47% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.58" for 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 event Inflow = 6.93 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.327 af Outflow = 6.16 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.327 af, Atten= 11%, Lag= 1.9 min Primary = 6.16 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.327 af Routed to Pond 2P : BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Automatic Starting Elev= 958.95' Surf.Area= 2,354 sf Storage= 5,030 cf Peak Elev= 960.03' @ 12.12 hrs Surf.Area= 2,354 sf Storage= 6,536 cf (1,505 cf above start) Plug-Flow detention time= 141.4 min calculated for 0.211 af (65% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 16.9 min ( 800.6 - 783.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 954.80' 0 cf 32.25'W x 73.00'L x 6.50'H Field A 15,303 cf Overall - 7,139 cf Embedded = 8,163 cf x 0.0% Voids #2A 955.30' 7,139 cf CMP Round 66 x 12 Inside #1 Effective Size= 66.0"W x 66.0"H => 23.76 sf x 20.00'L = 475.2 cf Overall Size= 66.0"W x 66.0"H x 20.00'L 12 Chambers in 4 Rows 30.25' Header x 23.76 sf x 2 = 1,437.4 cf Inside 7,139 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 958.95'24.0" Round Culvert L= 50.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 958.95' / 957.95' S= 0.0200 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 3.14 sf Primary OutFlow Max=6.15 cfs @ 12.12 hrs HW=960.03' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 6.15 cfs @ 3.54 fps) 484 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 50HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = CMP Round 66 (Round Corrugated Metal Pipe) Effective Size= 66.0"W x 66.0"H => 23.76 sf x 20.00'L = 475.2 cf Overall Size= 66.0"W x 66.0"H x 20.00'L 66.0" Wide + 33.0" Spacing = 99.0" C-C Row Spacing 3 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +5.50' Header x 2 = 71.00' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 73.00' Base Length 4 Rows x 66.0" Wide + 33.0" Spacing x 3 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 32.25' Base Width 6.0" Stone Base + 66.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Stone Cover = 6.50' Field Height 12 Chambers x 475.2 cf + 30.25' Header x 23.76 sf x 2 = 7,139.4 cf Chamber Storage 15,302.6 cf Field - 7,139.4 cf Chambers = 8,163.3 cf Stone x 0.0% Voids = 0.0 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage = 7,139.4 cf = 0.164 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 46.7% Overall System Size = 73.00' x 32.25' x 6.50' 12 Chambers 566.8 cy Field 302.3 cy Stone 485 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 51HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=1.522 ac Peak Elev=960.03' Storage=6,536 cf 24.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=50.0' S=0.0200 '/' 6.93 cfs 6.16 cfs Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE Primary Stage-Discharge Discharge (cfs) 1614121086420Elevation (feet)961 960 959 958 957 956 955 Culvert 486 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 52HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (cubic-feet) 7,0006,0005,0004,0003,0002,0001,0000Elevation (feet)961 960 959 958 957 956 955 Starting Elevation Field A CMP Round 66 487 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 53HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Storage (cubic-feet) Elevation (feet) Primary (cfs) 0.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 5.00 0.00 5,049 958.96 0.00 10.00 0.05 5,148 959.03 0.04 15.00 0.22 5,318 959.14 0.22 20.00 0.03 5,143 959.02 0.03 25.00 0.00 5,084 958.98 0.01 30.00 0.00 5,044 958.96 0.00 35.00 0.00 5,037 958.95 0.00 40.00 0.00 5,034 958.95 0.00 45.00 0.00 5,032 958.95 0.00 50.00 0.00 5,031 958.95 0.00 55.00 0.00 5,031 958.95 0.00 60.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 65.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 70.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 75.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 80.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 85.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 90.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 95.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 100.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 105.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 110.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 115.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 120.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 125.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 130.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 135.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 140.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 145.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 150.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 155.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 160.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 165.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 170.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 175.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 180.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 185.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 190.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 195.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 200.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 205.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 210.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 215.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 220.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 225.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 230.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 235.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 240.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 488 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 54HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Inflow Area = 1.829 ac, 14.54% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.52" for 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 event Inflow = 7.31 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.385 af Outflow = 1.60 cfs @ 12.54 hrs, Volume= 0.385 af, Atten= 78%, Lag= 25.5 min Primary = 1.60 cfs @ 12.54 hrs, Volume= 0.385 af Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 953.16' @ 12.54 hrs Surf.Area= 4,434 sf Storage= 7,739 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 413.4 min calculated for 0.385 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 413.4 min ( 1,213.6 - 800.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 951.00' 31,458 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 951.00 2,774 0 0 952.00 3,507 3,141 3,141 953.00 4,299 3,903 7,044 954.00 5,149 4,724 11,768 955.00 6,060 5,605 17,372 956.00 7,028 6,544 23,916 957.00 8,056 7,542 31,458 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 949.00'12.0" Round Culvert L= 90.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 949.00' / 947.96' S= 0.0116 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.015 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 949.00'6.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Device 2 951.00'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #4 Device 1 952.50'12.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #5 Secondary 955.25'10.0' long x 3.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Coef. (English) 2.44 2.58 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.68 2.68 2.72 2.81 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=1.60 cfs @ 12.54 hrs HW=953.16' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Passes 1.60 cfs of 5.63 cfs potential flow) 2=Orifice/Grate (Passes 0.08 cfs of 1.87 cfs potential flow) 3=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.08 cfs) 4=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 1.52 cfs @ 2.76 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=951.00' (Free Discharge) 5=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 489 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 55HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Inflow Outflow Primary Secondary Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=1.829 ac Peak Elev=953.16' Storage=7,739 cf 7.31 cfs 1.60 cfs 1.60 cfs 0.00 cfs Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Total Primary Secondary Stage-Discharge Discharge (cfs) 65605550454035302520151050Elevation (feet)957 956 955 954 953 952 951 Exfiltration Orifice/Grate Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir 490 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 56HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Surface Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (cubic-feet) 30,00028,00026,00024,00022,00020,00018,00016,00014,00012,00010,0008,0006,0004,0002,0000 Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq-ft) 8,0007,5007,0006,5006,0005,5005,0004,5004,0003,5003,0002,5002,0001,5001,0005000 Elevation (feet)957 956 955 954 953 952 951 Custom Stage Data 491 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 10y 24hr 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Rainfall=4.27" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 57HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Storage (cubic-feet) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) Primary (cfs) Secondary (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 2 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.04 77 951.03 0.02 0.02 0.00 15.00 0.26 5,906 952.73 0.30 0.30 0.00 20.00 0.04 5,102 952.53 0.08 0.08 0.00 25.00 0.01 4,446 952.36 0.07 0.07 0.00 30.00 0.00 3,265 952.04 0.07 0.07 0.00 35.00 0.00 2,135 951.70 0.06 0.06 0.00 40.00 0.00 1,082 951.37 0.06 0.06 0.00 45.00 0.00 118 951.04 0.04 0.04 0.00 50.00 0.00 1 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 85.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 105.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 110.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 115.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 130.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 135.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 145.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 155.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 165.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 170.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 175.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 185.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 190.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 195.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 205.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 215.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 220.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 235.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 240.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 492 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 58HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=11,039 sf 2.74% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.58"Subcatchment PR1A: TO WETLAND Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=2.32 cfs 0.118 af Runoff Area=52,918 sf 0.89% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.54"Subcatchment PR1B: TO CREEK Flow Length=293' Tc=11.5 min CN=WQ Runoff=8.65 cfs 0.561 af Runoff Area=66,320 sf 17.47% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.44"Subcatchment PR1C: SITE Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=13.48 cfs 0.690 af Runoff Area=13,349 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.07"Subcatchment PR1D: SITE Tc=6.0 min CN=80 Runoff=2.61 cfs 0.130 af Runoff Area=9,022 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.53"Subcatchment PR2: TO WESTERN Tc=6.0 min CN=84 Runoff=1.89 cfs 0.095 af Runoff Area=6,198 sf 57.15% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.27"Subcatchment PR3: TO W 78TH ST Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=1.37 cfs 0.074 af Inflow=2.32 cfs 0.118 afReach 1R: EX WETLAND Outflow=2.32 cfs 0.118 af Inflow=14.26 cfs 1.499 afReach 2R: RILEY CREEK Outflow=14.26 cfs 1.499 af Peak Elev=960.68' Storage=7,103 cf Inflow=13.48 cfs 0.690 afPond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE 24.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=50.0' S=0.0200 '/' Outflow=12.98 cfs 0.690 af Peak Elev=954.48' Storage=14,326 cf Inflow=15.49 cfs 0.820 afPond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Primary=4.70 cfs 0.820 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=4.70 cfs 0.820 af Total Runoff Area = 3.647 ac Runoff Volume = 1.669 af Average Runoff Depth = 5.49" 89.99% Pervious = 3.282 ac 10.01% Impervious = 0.365 ac 493 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 59HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1A: TO WETLAND Runoff = 2.32 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.118 af, Depth= 5.58" Routed to Reach 1R : EX WETLAND Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Area (sf) CN Description * 10,736 84 PERVIOUS 303 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG D 11,039 Weighted Average 10,736 97.26% Pervious Area 303 2.74% Impervious Area 303 100.00% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1A: TO WETLAND Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)2 1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Runoff Area=11,039 sf Runoff Volume=0.118 af Runoff Depth=5.58" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 2.32 cfs 494 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 60HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR1A: TO WETLAND Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.79 0.07 0.03 15.00 6.96 5.11 0.08 20.00 7.29 5.41 0.01 25.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 30.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 35.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 40.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 45.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 50.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 55.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 60.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 65.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 70.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 75.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 80.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 85.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 90.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 95.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 100.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 105.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 110.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 115.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 120.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 125.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 130.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 135.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 140.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 145.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 150.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 155.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 160.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 165.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 170.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 175.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 180.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 185.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 190.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 195.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 200.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 205.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 210.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 215.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 220.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 225.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 230.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 235.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 240.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 495 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 61HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1B: TO CREEK Runoff = 8.65 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.561 af, Depth= 5.54" Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Area (sf) CN Description 469 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG D * 52,449 84 PERVIOUS 52,918 Weighted Average 52,449 99.11% Pervious Area 469 0.89% Impervious Area 469 100.00% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 9.0 100 0.0710 0.19 Sheet Flow, SF Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.94" 2.5 193 0.0660 1.28 Shallow Concentrated Flow, SCF Woodland Kv= 5.0 fps 11.5 293 Total Subcatchment PR1B: TO CREEK Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Runoff Area=52,918 sf Runoff Volume=0.561 af Runoff Depth=5.54" Flow Length=293' Tc=11.5 min CN=WQ 8.65 cfs 496 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 62HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR1B: TO CREEK Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.79 0.07 0.12 15.00 6.96 5.11 0.39 20.00 7.29 5.41 0.04 25.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 30.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 35.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 40.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 45.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 50.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 55.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 60.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 65.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 70.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 75.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 80.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 85.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 90.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 95.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 100.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 105.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 110.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 115.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 120.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 125.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 130.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 135.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 140.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 145.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 150.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 155.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 160.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 165.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 170.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 175.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 180.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 185.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 190.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 195.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 200.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 205.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 210.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 215.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 220.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 225.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 230.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 235.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 240.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 497 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 63HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1C: SITE Runoff = 13.48 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.690 af, Depth= 5.44" Routed to Pond 1P : WATER REUSE STORAGE Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Area (sf) CN Description 54,737 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 11,583 98 Paved parking, HSG D 66,320 Weighted Average 54,737 82.53% Pervious Area 11,583 17.47% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1C: SITE Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Runoff Area=66,320 sf Runoff Volume=0.690 af Runoff Depth=5.44" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 13.48 cfs 498 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 64HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR1C: SITE Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.79 0.06 0.16 15.00 6.96 4.99 0.49 20.00 7.29 5.30 0.04 25.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 30.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 35.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 40.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 45.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 50.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 55.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 60.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 65.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 70.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 75.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 80.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 85.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 90.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 95.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 100.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 105.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 110.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 115.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 120.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 125.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 130.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 135.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 140.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 145.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 150.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 155.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 160.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 165.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 170.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 175.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 180.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 185.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 190.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 195.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 200.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 205.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 210.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 215.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 220.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 225.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 230.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 235.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 240.00 7.41 5.42 0.00 499 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 65HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1D: SITE Runoff = 2.61 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.130 af, Depth= 5.07" Routed to Pond 2P : BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Area (sf) CN Description 13,349 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 13,349 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1D: SITE Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)2 1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Runoff Area=13,349 sf Runoff Volume=0.130 af Runoff Depth=5.07" Tc=6.0 min CN=80 2.61 cfs 500 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 66HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR1D: SITE Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.79 0.03 0.02 15.00 6.96 4.66 0.10 20.00 7.29 4.96 0.01 25.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 30.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 35.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 40.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 45.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 50.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 55.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 60.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 65.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 70.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 75.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 80.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 85.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 90.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 95.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 100.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 105.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 110.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 115.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 120.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 125.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 130.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 135.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 140.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 145.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 150.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 155.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 160.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 165.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 170.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 175.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 180.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 185.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 190.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 195.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 200.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 205.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 210.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 215.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 220.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 225.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 230.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 235.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 240.00 7.41 5.07 0.00 501 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 67HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Runoff = 1.89 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.095 af, Depth= 5.53" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Area (sf) CN Description 9,022 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 9,022 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)2 1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Runoff Area=9,022 sf Runoff Volume=0.095 af Runoff Depth=5.53" Tc=6.0 min CN=84 1.89 cfs 502 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 68HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.79 0.07 0.02 15.00 6.96 5.11 0.07 20.00 7.29 5.41 0.01 25.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 30.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 35.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 40.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 45.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 50.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 55.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 60.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 65.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 70.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 75.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 80.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 85.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 90.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 95.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 100.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 105.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 110.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 115.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 120.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 125.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 130.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 135.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 140.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 145.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 150.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 155.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 160.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 165.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 170.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 175.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 180.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 185.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 190.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 195.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 200.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 205.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 210.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 215.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 220.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 225.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 230.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 235.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 240.00 7.41 5.53 0.00 503 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 69HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR3: TO W 78TH ST Runoff = 1.37 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.074 af, Depth= 6.27" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Area (sf) CN Description 2,656 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 3,542 98 Paved parking, HSG D 6,198 Weighted Average 2,656 42.85% Pervious Area 3,542 57.15% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR3: TO W 78TH ST Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)1 0 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Runoff Area=6,198 sf Runoff Volume=0.074 af Runoff Depth=6.27" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 1.37 cfs 504 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 70HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR3: TO W 78TH ST Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.79 0.19 0.03 15.00 6.96 5.79 0.05 20.00 7.29 6.10 0.00 25.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 30.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 35.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 40.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 45.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 50.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 55.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 60.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 65.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 70.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 75.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 80.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 85.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 90.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 95.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 100.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 105.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 110.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 115.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 120.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 125.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 130.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 135.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 140.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 145.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 150.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 155.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 160.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 165.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 170.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 175.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 180.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 185.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 190.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 195.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 200.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 205.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 210.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 215.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 220.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 225.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 230.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 235.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 240.00 7.41 6.23 0.00 505 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 71HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 1R: EX WETLAND [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.253 ac, 2.74% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.58" for 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 event Inflow = 2.32 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.118 af Outflow = 2.32 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.118 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 1R: EX WETLAND Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)2 1 0 Inflow Area=0.253 ac 2.32 cfs 2.32 cfs 506 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 72HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Reach 1R: EX WETLAND Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.03 0.03 15.00 0.08 0.08 20.00 0.01 0.01 25.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 85.00 0.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 105.00 0.00 0.00 110.00 0.00 0.00 115.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0.00 130.00 0.00 0.00 135.00 0.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 0.00 145.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 0.00 155.00 0.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 0.00 165.00 0.00 0.00 170.00 0.00 0.00 175.00 0.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 0.00 185.00 0.00 0.00 190.00 0.00 0.00 195.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 205.00 0.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 0.00 215.00 0.00 0.00 220.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 0.00 0.00 235.00 0.00 0.00 240.00 0.00 0.00 507 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 73HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 3.297 ac, 8.60% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.46" for 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 event Inflow = 14.26 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 1.499 af Outflow = 14.26 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 1.499 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=3.297 ac 14.26 cfs 14.26 cfs 508 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 74HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.20 0.20 15.00 1.10 1.10 20.00 0.13 0.13 25.00 0.07 0.07 30.00 0.07 0.07 35.00 0.06 0.06 40.00 0.06 0.06 45.00 0.05 0.05 50.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 85.00 0.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 105.00 0.00 0.00 110.00 0.00 0.00 115.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0.00 130.00 0.00 0.00 135.00 0.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 0.00 145.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 0.00 155.00 0.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 0.00 165.00 0.00 0.00 170.00 0.00 0.00 175.00 0.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 0.00 185.00 0.00 0.00 190.00 0.00 0.00 195.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 205.00 0.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 0.00 215.00 0.00 0.00 220.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 0.00 0.00 235.00 0.00 0.00 240.00 0.00 0.00 509 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 75HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE Inflow Area = 1.522 ac, 17.47% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.44" for 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 event Inflow = 13.48 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.690 af Outflow = 12.98 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.690 af, Atten= 4%, Lag= 1.1 min Primary = 12.98 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.690 af Routed to Pond 2P : BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Automatic Starting Elev= 958.95' Surf.Area= 2,354 sf Storage= 5,030 cf Peak Elev= 960.68' @ 12.10 hrs Surf.Area= 2,354 sf Storage= 7,103 cf (2,072 cf above start) Plug-Flow detention time= 74.4 min calculated for 0.575 af (83% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 11.0 min ( 776.2 - 765.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 954.80' 0 cf 32.25'W x 73.00'L x 6.50'H Field A 15,303 cf Overall - 7,139 cf Embedded = 8,163 cf x 0.0% Voids #2A 955.30' 7,139 cf CMP Round 66 x 12 Inside #1 Effective Size= 66.0"W x 66.0"H => 23.76 sf x 20.00'L = 475.2 cf Overall Size= 66.0"W x 66.0"H x 20.00'L 12 Chambers in 4 Rows 30.25' Header x 23.76 sf x 2 = 1,437.4 cf Inside 7,139 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 958.95'24.0" Round Culvert L= 50.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 958.95' / 957.95' S= 0.0200 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 3.14 sf Primary OutFlow Max=12.94 cfs @ 12.10 hrs HW=960.68' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 12.94 cfs @ 4.48 fps) 510 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 76HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = CMP Round 66 (Round Corrugated Metal Pipe) Effective Size= 66.0"W x 66.0"H => 23.76 sf x 20.00'L = 475.2 cf Overall Size= 66.0"W x 66.0"H x 20.00'L 66.0" Wide + 33.0" Spacing = 99.0" C-C Row Spacing 3 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +5.50' Header x 2 = 71.00' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 73.00' Base Length 4 Rows x 66.0" Wide + 33.0" Spacing x 3 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 32.25' Base Width 6.0" Stone Base + 66.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Stone Cover = 6.50' Field Height 12 Chambers x 475.2 cf + 30.25' Header x 23.76 sf x 2 = 7,139.4 cf Chamber Storage 15,302.6 cf Field - 7,139.4 cf Chambers = 8,163.3 cf Stone x 0.0% Voids = 0.0 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage = 7,139.4 cf = 0.164 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 46.7% Overall System Size = 73.00' x 32.25' x 6.50' 12 Chambers 566.8 cy Field 302.3 cy Stone 511 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 77HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=1.522 ac Peak Elev=960.68' Storage=7,103 cf 24.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=50.0' S=0.0200 '/' 13.48 cfs 12.98 cfs Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE Primary Stage-Discharge Discharge (cfs) 1614121086420Elevation (feet)961 960 959 958 957 956 955 Culvert 512 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 78HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (cubic-feet) 7,0006,0005,0004,0003,0002,0001,0000Elevation (feet)961 960 959 958 957 956 955 Starting Elevation Field A CMP Round 66 513 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 79HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Storage (cubic-feet) Elevation (feet) Primary (cfs) 0.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 5.00 0.00 5,058 958.97 0.00 10.00 0.16 5,254 959.09 0.13 15.00 0.49 5,460 959.23 0.49 20.00 0.04 5,161 959.03 0.05 25.00 0.00 5,089 958.99 0.01 30.00 0.00 5,044 958.96 0.00 35.00 0.00 5,037 958.95 0.00 40.00 0.00 5,034 958.95 0.00 45.00 0.00 5,032 958.95 0.00 50.00 0.00 5,031 958.95 0.00 55.00 0.00 5,031 958.95 0.00 60.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 65.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 70.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 75.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 80.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 85.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 90.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 95.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 100.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 105.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 110.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 115.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 120.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 125.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 130.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 135.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 140.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 145.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 150.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 155.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 160.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 165.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 170.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 175.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 180.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 185.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 190.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 195.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 200.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 205.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 210.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 215.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 220.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 225.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 230.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 235.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 240.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 514 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 80HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Inflow Area = 1.829 ac, 14.54% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.38" for 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 event Inflow = 15.49 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.820 af Outflow = 4.70 cfs @ 12.36 hrs, Volume= 0.820 af, Atten= 70%, Lag= 15.5 min Primary = 4.70 cfs @ 12.36 hrs, Volume= 0.820 af Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 954.48' @ 12.36 hrs Surf.Area= 5,583 sf Storage= 14,326 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 223.9 min calculated for 0.820 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 223.9 min ( 999.6 - 775.7 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 951.00' 31,458 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 951.00 2,774 0 0 952.00 3,507 3,141 3,141 953.00 4,299 3,903 7,044 954.00 5,149 4,724 11,768 955.00 6,060 5,605 17,372 956.00 7,028 6,544 23,916 957.00 8,056 7,542 31,458 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 949.00'12.0" Round Culvert L= 90.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 949.00' / 947.96' S= 0.0116 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.015 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 949.00'6.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Device 2 951.00'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #4 Device 1 952.50'12.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #5 Secondary 955.25'10.0' long x 3.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Coef. (English) 2.44 2.58 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.68 2.68 2.72 2.81 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=4.70 cfs @ 12.36 hrs HW=954.48' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Passes 4.70 cfs of 6.45 cfs potential flow) 2=Orifice/Grate (Passes 0.10 cfs of 2.16 cfs potential flow) 3=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.10 cfs) 4=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 4.60 cfs @ 5.85 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=951.00' (Free Discharge) 5=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 515 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 81HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Inflow Outflow Primary Secondary Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=1.829 ac Peak Elev=954.48' Storage=14,326 cf 15.49 cfs 4.70 cfs 4.70 cfs 0.00 cfs Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Total Primary Secondary Stage-Discharge Discharge (cfs) 65605550454035302520151050Elevation (feet)957 956 955 954 953 952 951 Exfiltration Orifice/Grate Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir 516 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 82HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Surface Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (cubic-feet) 30,00028,00026,00024,00022,00020,00018,00016,00014,00012,00010,0008,0006,0004,0002,0000 Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq-ft) 8,0007,5007,0006,5006,0005,5005,0004,5004,0003,5003,0002,5002,0001,5001,0005000 Elevation (feet)957 956 955 954 953 952 951 Custom Stage Data 517 MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 100y 24hr 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Rainfall=7.41" Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 83HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Storage (cubic-feet) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) Primary (cfs) Secondary (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 5 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.15 214 951.08 0.05 0.05 0.00 15.00 0.58 6,481 952.87 0.62 0.62 0.00 20.00 0.05 5,199 952.55 0.09 0.09 0.00 25.00 0.01 4,709 952.43 0.07 0.07 0.00 30.00 0.00 3,514 952.11 0.07 0.07 0.00 35.00 0.00 2,366 951.77 0.06 0.06 0.00 40.00 0.00 1,296 951.44 0.06 0.06 0.00 45.00 0.00 306 951.11 0.05 0.05 0.00 50.00 0.00 2 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 85.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 105.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 110.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 115.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 130.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 135.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 145.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 155.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 165.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 170.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 175.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 185.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 190.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 195.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 205.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 215.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 220.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 235.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 240.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 518 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 84HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-240.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 24001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q Reach routing by Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=11,039 sf 2.74% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.37"Subcatchment PR1A: TO WETLAND Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.04 cfs 0.113 af Runoff Area=52,918 sf 0.89% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.34"Subcatchment PR1B: TO CREEK Flow Length=293' Tc=11.5 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.20 cfs 0.541 af Runoff Area=66,320 sf 17.47% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.24"Subcatchment PR1C: SITE Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.25 cfs 0.665 af Runoff Area=13,349 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>4.88"Subcatchment PR1D: SITE Tc=6.0 min CN=80 Runoff=0.05 cfs 0.125 af Runoff Area=9,022 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.33"Subcatchment PR2: TO WESTERN Tc=6.0 min CN=84 Runoff=0.03 cfs 0.092 af Runoff Area=6,198 sf 57.15% Impervious Runoff Depth>6.07"Subcatchment PR3: TO W 78TH ST Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ Runoff=0.03 cfs 0.072 af Inflow=0.04 cfs 0.113 afReach 1R: EX WETLAND Outflow=0.04 cfs 0.113 af Inflow=0.31 cfs 1.441 afReach 2R: RILEY CREEK Outflow=0.31 cfs 1.441 af Peak Elev=959.15' Storage=5,334 cf Inflow=0.25 cfs 0.665 afPond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE 24.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=50.0' S=0.0200 '/' Outflow=0.24 cfs 0.663 af Peak Elev=952.63' Storage=5,512 cf Inflow=0.29 cfs 0.788 afPond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Primary=0.15 cfs 0.786 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=0.15 cfs 0.786 af Total Runoff Area = 3.647 ac Runoff Volume = 1.608 af Average Runoff Depth = 5.29" 89.99% Pervious = 3.282 ac 10.01% Impervious = 0.365 ac 519 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 85HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1A: TO WETLAND Runoff = 0.04 cfs @ 121.26 hrs, Volume= 0.113 af, Depth> 5.37" Routed to Reach 1R : EX WETLAND Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20" Area (sf) CN Description * 10,736 84 PERVIOUS 303 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG D 11,039 Weighted Average 10,736 97.26% Pervious Area 303 2.74% Impervious Area 303 100.00% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1A: TO WETLAND Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.046 0.044 0.042 0.04 0.038 0.036 0.034 0.032 0.03 0.028 0.026 0.024 0.022 0.02 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002 0 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20" Runoff Area=11,039 sf Runoff Volume=0.113 af Runoff Depth>5.37" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 0.04 cfs 520 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 86HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR1A: TO WETLAND Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 25.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.56 0.02 0.00 40.00 0.66 0.04 0.00 45.00 0.76 0.06 0.00 50.00 0.86 0.10 0.00 55.00 0.97 0.14 0.00 60.00 1.08 0.19 0.00 65.00 1.19 0.24 0.00 70.00 1.31 0.31 0.00 75.00 1.44 0.38 0.00 80.00 1.57 0.46 0.00 85.00 1.71 0.54 0.00 90.00 1.86 0.65 0.01 95.00 2.03 0.76 0.01 100.00 2.20 0.89 0.01 105.00 2.40 1.04 0.01 110.00 2.65 1.23 0.01 115.00 2.94 1.46 0.01 120.00 3.53 1.96 0.04 125.00 4.27 2.61 0.02 130.00 4.62 2.93 0.01 135.00 4.87 3.15 0.01 140.00 5.06 3.33 0.01 145.00 5.23 3.48 0.01 150.00 5.39 3.63 0.01 155.00 5.53 3.76 0.01 160.00 5.67 3.89 0.01 165.00 5.80 4.01 0.01 170.00 5.92 4.12 0.01 175.00 6.03 4.23 0.01 180.00 6.14 4.33 0.01 185.00 6.25 4.43 0.01 190.00 6.36 4.53 0.00 195.00 6.46 4.63 0.00 200.00 6.55 4.72 0.00 205.00 6.65 4.81 0.00 210.00 6.74 4.89 0.00 215.00 6.82 4.97 0.00 220.00 6.91 5.05 0.00 225.00 6.98 5.13 0.00 230.00 7.06 5.20 0.00 235.00 7.13 5.27 0.00 240.00 7.20 5.33 0.00 521 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 87HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1B: TO CREEK Runoff = 0.20 cfs @ 121.30 hrs, Volume= 0.541 af, Depth> 5.34" Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20" Area (sf) CN Description 469 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG D * 52,449 84 PERVIOUS 52,918 Weighted Average 52,449 99.11% Pervious Area 469 0.89% Impervious Area 469 100.00% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 9.0 100 0.0710 0.19 Sheet Flow, SF Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.94" 2.5 193 0.0660 1.28 Shallow Concentrated Flow, SCF Woodland Kv= 5.0 fps 11.5 293 Total Subcatchment PR1B: TO CREEK Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.22 0.21 0.2 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.1 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20" Runoff Area=52,918 sf Runoff Volume=0.541 af Runoff Depth>5.34" Flow Length=293' Tc=11.5 min CN=WQ 0.20 cfs 522 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 88HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR1B: TO CREEK Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 25.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.56 0.02 0.00 40.00 0.66 0.04 0.01 45.00 0.76 0.06 0.01 50.00 0.86 0.10 0.01 55.00 0.97 0.14 0.01 60.00 1.08 0.19 0.01 65.00 1.19 0.24 0.01 70.00 1.31 0.31 0.02 75.00 1.44 0.38 0.02 80.00 1.57 0.46 0.02 85.00 1.71 0.54 0.02 90.00 1.86 0.65 0.03 95.00 2.03 0.76 0.03 100.00 2.20 0.89 0.03 105.00 2.40 1.04 0.04 110.00 2.65 1.23 0.05 115.00 2.94 1.46 0.07 120.00 3.53 1.96 0.18 125.00 4.27 2.61 0.11 130.00 4.62 2.93 0.06 135.00 4.87 3.15 0.05 140.00 5.06 3.33 0.04 145.00 5.23 3.48 0.04 150.00 5.39 3.63 0.03 155.00 5.53 3.76 0.03 160.00 5.67 3.89 0.03 165.00 5.80 4.01 0.03 170.00 5.92 4.12 0.03 175.00 6.03 4.23 0.03 180.00 6.14 4.33 0.02 185.00 6.25 4.43 0.02 190.00 6.36 4.53 0.02 195.00 6.46 4.63 0.02 200.00 6.55 4.72 0.02 205.00 6.65 4.81 0.02 210.00 6.74 4.89 0.02 215.00 6.82 4.97 0.02 220.00 6.91 5.05 0.02 225.00 6.98 5.13 0.02 230.00 7.06 5.20 0.02 235.00 7.13 5.27 0.02 240.00 7.20 5.33 0.01 523 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 89HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1C: SITE Runoff = 0.25 cfs @ 121.26 hrs, Volume= 0.665 af, Depth> 5.24" Routed to Pond 1P : WATER REUSE STORAGE Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20" Area (sf) CN Description 54,737 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 11,583 98 Paved parking, HSG D 66,320 Weighted Average 54,737 82.53% Pervious Area 11,583 17.47% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1C: SITE Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20" Runoff Area=66,320 sf Runoff Volume=0.665 af Runoff Depth>5.24" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 0.25 cfs 524 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 90HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR1C: SITE Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 25.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.56 0.01 0.01 40.00 0.66 0.03 0.01 45.00 0.76 0.05 0.01 50.00 0.86 0.08 0.01 55.00 0.97 0.12 0.01 60.00 1.08 0.17 0.02 65.00 1.19 0.22 0.02 70.00 1.31 0.28 0.02 75.00 1.44 0.34 0.02 80.00 1.57 0.42 0.02 85.00 1.71 0.50 0.03 90.00 1.86 0.60 0.03 95.00 2.03 0.71 0.04 100.00 2.20 0.83 0.04 105.00 2.40 0.98 0.05 110.00 2.65 1.17 0.06 115.00 2.94 1.40 0.08 120.00 3.53 1.88 0.22 125.00 4.27 2.52 0.13 130.00 4.62 2.83 0.08 135.00 4.87 3.05 0.06 140.00 5.06 3.23 0.05 145.00 5.23 3.38 0.04 150.00 5.39 3.53 0.04 155.00 5.53 3.66 0.04 160.00 5.67 3.79 0.04 165.00 5.80 3.91 0.04 170.00 5.92 4.02 0.03 175.00 6.03 4.12 0.03 180.00 6.14 4.23 0.03 185.00 6.25 4.33 0.03 190.00 6.36 4.42 0.03 195.00 6.46 4.52 0.03 200.00 6.55 4.61 0.03 205.00 6.65 4.70 0.03 210.00 6.74 4.78 0.03 215.00 6.82 4.86 0.02 220.00 6.91 4.94 0.02 225.00 6.98 5.01 0.02 230.00 7.06 5.09 0.02 235.00 7.13 5.15 0.02 240.00 7.20 5.22 0.02 525 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 91HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR1D: SITE Runoff = 0.05 cfs @ 121.26 hrs, Volume= 0.125 af, Depth> 4.88" Routed to Pond 2P : BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20" Area (sf) CN Description 13,349 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 13,349 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1D: SITE Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20" Runoff Area=13,349 sf Runoff Volume=0.125 af Runoff Depth>4.88" Tc=6.0 min CN=80 0.05 cfs 526 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 92HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR1D: SITE Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 25.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.56 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.66 0.01 0.00 45.00 0.76 0.02 0.00 50.00 0.86 0.05 0.00 55.00 0.97 0.07 0.00 60.00 1.08 0.11 0.00 65.00 1.19 0.15 0.00 70.00 1.31 0.20 0.00 75.00 1.44 0.26 0.00 80.00 1.57 0.32 0.00 85.00 1.71 0.39 0.00 90.00 1.86 0.48 0.01 95.00 2.03 0.58 0.01 100.00 2.20 0.69 0.01 105.00 2.40 0.82 0.01 110.00 2.65 0.99 0.01 115.00 2.94 1.20 0.02 120.00 3.53 1.66 0.04 125.00 4.27 2.26 0.03 130.00 4.62 2.57 0.02 135.00 4.87 2.78 0.01 140.00 5.06 2.95 0.01 145.00 5.23 3.10 0.01 150.00 5.39 3.23 0.01 155.00 5.53 3.36 0.01 160.00 5.67 3.49 0.01 165.00 5.80 3.60 0.01 170.00 5.92 3.71 0.01 175.00 6.03 3.81 0.01 180.00 6.14 3.91 0.01 185.00 6.25 4.01 0.01 190.00 6.36 4.10 0.01 195.00 6.46 4.20 0.01 200.00 6.55 4.28 0.01 205.00 6.65 4.37 0.01 210.00 6.74 4.45 0.00 215.00 6.82 4.53 0.00 220.00 6.91 4.61 0.00 225.00 6.98 4.68 0.00 230.00 7.06 4.75 0.00 235.00 7.13 4.82 0.00 240.00 7.20 4.88 0.00 527 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 93HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Runoff = 0.03 cfs @ 121.26 hrs, Volume= 0.092 af, Depth> 5.33" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20" Area (sf) CN Description 9,022 84 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG D 9,022 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.038 0.036 0.034 0.032 0.03 0.028 0.026 0.024 0.022 0.02 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002 0 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20" Runoff Area=9,022 sf Runoff Volume=0.092 af Runoff Depth>5.33" Tc=6.0 min CN=84 0.03 cfs 528 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 94HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 25.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.56 0.02 0.00 40.00 0.66 0.04 0.00 45.00 0.76 0.06 0.00 50.00 0.86 0.10 0.00 55.00 0.97 0.14 0.00 60.00 1.08 0.19 0.00 65.00 1.19 0.24 0.00 70.00 1.31 0.31 0.00 75.00 1.44 0.38 0.00 80.00 1.57 0.46 0.00 85.00 1.71 0.54 0.00 90.00 1.86 0.65 0.00 95.00 2.03 0.76 0.01 100.00 2.20 0.89 0.01 105.00 2.40 1.04 0.01 110.00 2.65 1.23 0.01 115.00 2.94 1.46 0.01 120.00 3.53 1.96 0.03 125.00 4.27 2.61 0.02 130.00 4.62 2.93 0.01 135.00 4.87 3.15 0.01 140.00 5.06 3.33 0.01 145.00 5.23 3.48 0.01 150.00 5.39 3.63 0.01 155.00 5.53 3.76 0.01 160.00 5.67 3.89 0.01 165.00 5.80 4.01 0.00 170.00 5.92 4.12 0.00 175.00 6.03 4.23 0.00 180.00 6.14 4.33 0.00 185.00 6.25 4.43 0.00 190.00 6.36 4.53 0.00 195.00 6.46 4.63 0.00 200.00 6.55 4.72 0.00 205.00 6.65 4.81 0.00 210.00 6.74 4.89 0.00 215.00 6.82 4.97 0.00 220.00 6.91 5.05 0.00 225.00 6.98 5.13 0.00 230.00 7.06 5.20 0.00 235.00 7.13 5.27 0.00 240.00 7.20 5.33 0.00 529 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 95HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PR3: TO W 78TH ST Runoff = 0.03 cfs @ 121.26 hrs, Volume= 0.072 af, Depth> 6.07" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-Q, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20" Area (sf) CN Description 2,656 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 3,542 98 Paved parking, HSG D 6,198 Weighted Average 2,656 42.85% Pervious Area 3,542 57.15% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR3: TO W 78TH ST Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.028 0.026 0.024 0.022 0.02 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002 0 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20" Runoff Area=6,198 sf Runoff Volume=0.072 af Runoff Depth>6.07" Tc=6.0 min CN=WQ 0.03 cfs 530 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 96HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment PR3: TO W 78TH ST Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 25.00 0.37 0.02 0.00 30.00 0.46 0.04 0.00 35.00 0.56 0.08 0.00 40.00 0.66 0.12 0.00 45.00 0.76 0.17 0.00 50.00 0.86 0.23 0.00 55.00 0.97 0.30 0.00 60.00 1.08 0.37 0.00 65.00 1.19 0.45 0.00 70.00 1.31 0.54 0.00 75.00 1.44 0.63 0.00 80.00 1.57 0.74 0.00 85.00 1.71 0.85 0.00 90.00 1.86 0.98 0.00 95.00 2.03 1.12 0.00 100.00 2.20 1.26 0.00 105.00 2.40 1.44 0.01 110.00 2.65 1.66 0.01 115.00 2.94 1.93 0.01 120.00 3.53 2.47 0.02 125.00 4.27 3.17 0.01 130.00 4.62 3.51 0.01 135.00 4.87 3.75 0.01 140.00 5.06 3.94 0.00 145.00 5.23 4.10 0.00 150.00 5.39 4.25 0.00 155.00 5.53 4.39 0.00 160.00 5.67 4.53 0.00 165.00 5.80 4.65 0.00 170.00 5.92 4.77 0.00 175.00 6.03 4.88 0.00 180.00 6.14 4.99 0.00 185.00 6.25 5.09 0.00 190.00 6.36 5.19 0.00 195.00 6.46 5.29 0.00 200.00 6.55 5.39 0.00 205.00 6.65 5.48 0.00 210.00 6.74 5.57 0.00 215.00 6.82 5.65 0.00 220.00 6.91 5.73 0.00 225.00 6.98 5.81 0.00 230.00 7.06 5.88 0.00 235.00 7.13 5.95 0.00 240.00 7.20 6.02 0.00 531 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 97HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 1R: EX WETLAND [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.253 ac, 2.74% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.37" for MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr event Inflow = 0.04 cfs @ 121.26 hrs, Volume= 0.113 af Outflow = 0.04 cfs @ 121.26 hrs, Volume= 0.113 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 1R: EX WETLAND Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.046 0.044 0.042 0.04 0.038 0.036 0.034 0.032 0.03 0.028 0.026 0.024 0.022 0.02 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002 0 Inflow Area=0.253 ac 0.04 cfs 0.04 cfs 532 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 98HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Reach 1R: EX WETLAND Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 85.00 0.00 0.00 90.00 0.01 0.01 95.00 0.01 0.01 100.00 0.01 0.01 105.00 0.01 0.01 110.00 0.01 0.01 115.00 0.01 0.01 120.00 0.04 0.04 125.00 0.02 0.02 130.00 0.01 0.01 135.00 0.01 0.01 140.00 0.01 0.01 145.00 0.01 0.01 150.00 0.01 0.01 155.00 0.01 0.01 160.00 0.01 0.01 165.00 0.01 0.01 170.00 0.01 0.01 175.00 0.01 0.01 180.00 0.01 0.01 185.00 0.01 0.01 190.00 0.00 0.00 195.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 205.00 0.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 0.00 215.00 0.00 0.00 220.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 0.00 0.00 235.00 0.00 0.00 240.00 0.00 0.00 533 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 99HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 3.297 ac, 8.60% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.24" for MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr event Inflow = 0.31 cfs @ 121.30 hrs, Volume= 1.441 af Outflow = 0.31 cfs @ 121.30 hrs, Volume= 1.441 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.34 0.32 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 Inflow Area=3.297 ac 0.31 cfs 0.31 cfs 534 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 100HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.01 0.01 35.00 0.01 0.01 40.00 0.01 0.01 45.00 0.02 0.02 50.00 0.02 0.02 55.00 0.03 0.03 60.00 0.03 0.03 65.00 0.04 0.04 70.00 0.04 0.04 75.00 0.05 0.05 80.00 0.05 0.05 85.00 0.06 0.06 90.00 0.07 0.07 95.00 0.08 0.08 100.00 0.08 0.08 105.00 0.10 0.10 110.00 0.11 0.11 115.00 0.14 0.14 120.00 0.29 0.29 125.00 0.28 0.28 130.00 0.18 0.18 135.00 0.14 0.14 140.00 0.12 0.12 145.00 0.11 0.11 150.00 0.11 0.11 155.00 0.11 0.11 160.00 0.10 0.10 165.00 0.10 0.10 170.00 0.10 0.10 175.00 0.09 0.09 180.00 0.09 0.09 185.00 0.09 0.09 190.00 0.09 0.09 195.00 0.08 0.08 200.00 0.08 0.08 205.00 0.06 0.06 210.00 0.05 0.05 215.00 0.05 0.05 220.00 0.05 0.05 225.00 0.05 0.05 230.00 0.05 0.05 235.00 0.04 0.04 240.00 0.04 0.04 535 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 101HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE Inflow Area = 1.522 ac, 17.47% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.24" for MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr event Inflow = 0.25 cfs @ 121.26 hrs, Volume= 0.665 af Outflow = 0.24 cfs @ 121.37 hrs, Volume= 0.663 af, Atten= 1%, Lag= 6.4 min Primary = 0.24 cfs @ 121.37 hrs, Volume= 0.663 af Routed to Pond 2P : BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Automatic Starting Elev= 958.95' Surf.Area= 2,354 sf Storage= 5,030 cf Peak Elev= 959.15' @ 121.37 hrs Surf.Area= 2,354 sf Storage= 5,334 cf (304 cf above start) Plug-Flow detention time= 1,770.8 min calculated for 0.548 af (82% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 31.9 min ( 8,179.0 - 8,147.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 954.80' 0 cf 32.25'W x 73.00'L x 6.50'H Field A 15,303 cf Overall - 7,139 cf Embedded = 8,163 cf x 0.0% Voids #2A 955.30' 7,139 cf CMP Round 66 x 12 Inside #1 Effective Size= 66.0"W x 66.0"H => 23.76 sf x 20.00'L = 475.2 cf Overall Size= 66.0"W x 66.0"H x 20.00'L 12 Chambers in 4 Rows 30.25' Header x 23.76 sf x 2 = 1,437.4 cf Inside 7,139 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 958.95'24.0" Round Culvert L= 50.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 958.95' / 957.95' S= 0.0200 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 3.14 sf Primary OutFlow Max=0.24 cfs @ 121.37 hrs HW=959.15' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.24 cfs @ 1.51 fps) 536 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 102HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = CMP Round 66 (Round Corrugated Metal Pipe) Effective Size= 66.0"W x 66.0"H => 23.76 sf x 20.00'L = 475.2 cf Overall Size= 66.0"W x 66.0"H x 20.00'L 66.0" Wide + 33.0" Spacing = 99.0" C-C Row Spacing 3 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +5.50' Header x 2 = 71.00' Row Length +12.0" End Stone x 2 = 73.00' Base Length 4 Rows x 66.0" Wide + 33.0" Spacing x 3 + 12.0" Side Stone x 2 = 32.25' Base Width 6.0" Stone Base + 66.0" Chamber Height + 6.0" Stone Cover = 6.50' Field Height 12 Chambers x 475.2 cf + 30.25' Header x 23.76 sf x 2 = 7,139.4 cf Chamber Storage 15,302.6 cf Field - 7,139.4 cf Chambers = 8,163.3 cf Stone x 0.0% Voids = 0.0 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage = 7,139.4 cf = 0.164 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 46.7% Overall System Size = 73.00' x 32.25' x 6.50' 12 Chambers 566.8 cy Field 302.3 cy Stone 537 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 103HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 Inflow Area=1.522 ac Peak Elev=959.15' Storage=5,334 cf 24.0" Round Culvert n=0.013 L=50.0' S=0.0200 '/' 0.25 cfs 0.24 cfs Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE Primary Stage-Discharge Discharge (cfs) 1614121086420Elevation (feet)961 960 959 958 957 956 955 Culvert 538 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 104HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (cubic-feet) 7,0006,0005,0004,0003,0002,0001,0000Elevation (feet)961 960 959 958 957 956 955 Starting Elevation Field A CMP Round 66 539 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 105HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Storage (cubic-feet) Elevation (feet) Primary (cfs) 0.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 5.00 0.00 5,030 958.95 0.00 10.00 0.00 5,045 958.96 0.00 15.00 0.00 5,057 958.97 0.00 20.00 0.00 5,062 958.97 0.00 25.00 0.00 5,064 958.97 0.00 30.00 0.00 5,066 958.97 0.00 35.00 0.01 5,071 958.98 0.01 40.00 0.01 5,082 958.98 0.01 45.00 0.01 5,088 958.99 0.01 50.00 0.01 5,093 958.99 0.01 55.00 0.01 5,097 958.99 0.01 60.00 0.02 5,101 959.00 0.02 65.00 0.02 5,106 959.00 0.02 70.00 0.02 5,111 959.00 0.02 75.00 0.02 5,115 959.00 0.02 80.00 0.02 5,121 959.01 0.02 85.00 0.03 5,128 959.01 0.03 90.00 0.03 5,137 959.02 0.03 95.00 0.04 5,146 959.02 0.04 100.00 0.04 5,150 959.03 0.04 105.00 0.05 5,166 959.04 0.05 110.00 0.06 5,179 959.05 0.06 115.00 0.08 5,200 959.06 0.08 120.00 0.22 5,317 959.14 0.22 125.00 0.13 5,256 959.10 0.13 130.00 0.08 5,199 959.06 0.08 135.00 0.06 5,179 959.05 0.06 140.00 0.05 5,168 959.04 0.05 145.00 0.04 5,160 959.03 0.04 150.00 0.04 5,156 959.03 0.04 155.00 0.04 5,153 959.03 0.04 160.00 0.04 5,149 959.03 0.04 165.00 0.04 5,146 959.02 0.04 170.00 0.03 5,141 959.02 0.03 175.00 0.03 5,138 959.02 0.03 180.00 0.03 5,136 959.02 0.03 185.00 0.03 5,135 959.02 0.03 190.00 0.03 5,133 959.02 0.03 195.00 0.03 5,130 959.01 0.03 200.00 0.03 5,128 959.01 0.03 205.00 0.03 5,125 959.01 0.03 210.00 0.03 5,123 959.01 0.03 215.00 0.02 5,121 959.01 0.02 220.00 0.02 5,119 959.01 0.02 225.00 0.02 5,117 959.01 0.02 230.00 0.02 5,115 959.00 0.02 235.00 0.02 5,112 959.00 0.02 240.00 0.02 5,108 959.00 0.02 540 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 106HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Inflow Area = 1.829 ac, 14.54% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.17" for MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr event Inflow = 0.29 cfs @ 121.34 hrs, Volume= 0.788 af Outflow = 0.15 cfs @ 125.33 hrs, Volume= 0.786 af, Atten= 48%, Lag= 239.7 min Primary = 0.15 cfs @ 125.33 hrs, Volume= 0.786 af Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routed to Reach 2R : RILEY CREEK Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-240.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 952.63' @ 125.33 hrs Surf.Area= 4,007 sf Storage= 5,512 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 502.3 min calculated for 0.786 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 489.1 min ( 8,699.7 - 8,210.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 951.00' 31,458 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 951.00 2,774 0 0 952.00 3,507 3,141 3,141 953.00 4,299 3,903 7,044 954.00 5,149 4,724 11,768 955.00 6,060 5,605 17,372 956.00 7,028 6,544 23,916 957.00 8,056 7,542 31,458 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 949.00'12.0" Round Culvert L= 90.0' CMP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 949.00' / 947.96' S= 0.0116 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.015 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 949.00'6.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #3 Device 2 951.00'0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #4 Device 1 952.50'12.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #5 Secondary 955.25'10.0' long x 3.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Coef. (English) 2.44 2.58 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.68 2.68 2.72 2.81 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=0.15 cfs @ 125.33 hrs HW=952.63' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Passes 0.15 cfs of 5.26 cfs potential flow) 2=Orifice/Grate (Passes 0.07 cfs of 1.74 cfs potential flow) 3=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.07 cfs) 4=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.08 cfs @ 1.23 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=951.00' (Free Discharge) 5=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 541 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 107HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Inflow Outflow Primary Secondary Hydrograph Time (hours) 2402302202102001901801701601501401301201101009080706050403020100Flow (cfs)0.32 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 Inflow Area=1.829 ac Peak Elev=952.63' Storage=5,512 cf 0.29 cfs 0.15 cfs 0.15 cfs 0.00 cfs Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Total Primary Secondary Stage-Discharge Discharge (cfs) 65605550454035302520151050Elevation (feet)957 956 955 954 953 952 951 Exfiltration Orifice/Grate Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir 542 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 108HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Surface Storage Stage-Area-Storage Storage (cubic-feet) 30,00028,00026,00024,00022,00020,00018,00016,00014,00012,00010,0008,0006,0004,0002,0000 Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq-ft) 8,0007,5007,0006,5006,0005,5005,0004,5004,0003,5003,0002,5002,0001,5001,0005000 Elevation (feet)957 956 955 954 953 952 951 Custom Stage Data 543 MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Rainfall=7.20"2510 Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group Page 109HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Storage (cubic-feet) Elevation (feet) Outflow (cfs) Primary (cfs) Secondary (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 1 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 8 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 11 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 13 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 14 951.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.01 17 951.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 40.00 0.01 24 951.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 45.00 0.01 33 951.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 50.00 0.01 41 951.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 55.00 0.02 48 951.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 60.00 0.02 56 951.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 65.00 0.02 63 951.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 70.00 0.02 72 951.03 0.02 0.02 0.00 75.00 0.03 80 951.03 0.02 0.02 0.00 80.00 0.03 89 951.03 0.03 0.03 0.00 85.00 0.03 101 951.04 0.03 0.03 0.00 90.00 0.04 116 951.04 0.04 0.04 0.00 95.00 0.04 131 951.05 0.04 0.04 0.00 100.00 0.05 142 951.05 0.04 0.04 0.00 105.00 0.06 197 951.07 0.05 0.05 0.00 110.00 0.07 422 951.15 0.05 0.05 0.00 115.00 0.10 893 951.31 0.06 0.06 0.00 120.00 0.26 2,817 951.91 0.06 0.06 0.00 125.00 0.16 5,507 952.63 0.15 0.15 0.00 130.00 0.09 5,308 952.58 0.11 0.11 0.00 135.00 0.07 5,136 952.54 0.08 0.08 0.00 140.00 0.06 4,941 952.49 0.07 0.07 0.00 145.00 0.05 4,656 952.41 0.07 0.07 0.00 150.00 0.05 4,326 952.33 0.07 0.07 0.00 155.00 0.05 3,967 952.23 0.07 0.07 0.00 160.00 0.04 3,581 952.12 0.07 0.07 0.00 165.00 0.04 3,179 952.01 0.07 0.07 0.00 170.00 0.04 2,761 951.89 0.06 0.06 0.00 175.00 0.04 2,330 951.76 0.06 0.06 0.00 180.00 0.04 1,906 951.63 0.06 0.06 0.00 185.00 0.04 1,500 951.51 0.06 0.06 0.00 190.00 0.04 1,111 951.38 0.06 0.06 0.00 195.00 0.03 729 951.25 0.05 0.05 0.00 200.00 0.03 357 951.13 0.05 0.05 0.00 205.00 0.03 106 951.04 0.03 0.03 0.00 210.00 0.03 97 951.03 0.03 0.03 0.00 215.00 0.03 94 951.03 0.03 0.03 0.00 220.00 0.03 91 951.03 0.03 0.03 0.00 225.00 0.03 87 951.03 0.03 0.03 0.00 230.00 0.03 83 951.03 0.03 0.03 0.00 235.00 0.02 79 951.03 0.02 0.02 0.00 240.00 0.02 73 951.03 0.02 0.02 0.00 544 Table of Contents25102 PROPOSED Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Reports 1 Routing Diagram 2 Rainfall Events Listing (selected events) 3 Area Listing (all nodes) 4 Soil Listing (all nodes) 5 Ground Covers (all nodes) 2-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr2y_S1 Event 6 Node Listing 7 Subcat PR1A: TO WETLAND 9 Subcat PR1B: TO CREEK 11 Subcat PR1C: SITE 13 Subcat PR1D: SITE 15 Subcat PR2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY 17 Subcat PR3: TO W 78TH ST 19 Reach 1R: EX WETLAND 21 Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK 23 Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE 28 Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 10-yr MN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr10y_S1 Event 32 Node Listing 33 Subcat PR1A: TO WETLAND 35 Subcat PR1B: TO CREEK 37 Subcat PR1C: SITE 39 Subcat PR1D: SITE 41 Subcat PR2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY 43 Subcat PR3: TO W 78TH ST 45 Reach 1R: EX WETLAND 47 Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK 49 Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE 54 Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 100-yrMN-RPBCWD_v1_Atlas14_24-hr100y_S1 Event 58 Node Listing 59 Subcat PR1A: TO WETLAND 61 Subcat PR1B: TO CREEK 63 Subcat PR1C: SITE 65 Subcat PR1D: SITE 67 Subcat PR2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY 69 Subcat PR3: TO W 78TH ST 71 Reach 1R: EX WETLAND 73 Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK 75 Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE 80 Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 545 Table of Contents25102 PROPOSED Printed 5/14/2025Prepared by Civil Site Group HydroCAD® 10.20-6a s/n 02202 © 2024 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC MN-RPBCWD_Snowmelt_10d_100_yr Event 84 Node Listing 85 Subcat PR1A: TO WETLAND 87 Subcat PR1B: TO CREEK 89 Subcat PR1C: SITE 91 Subcat PR1D: SITE 93 Subcat PR2: TO WESTERN PROPERTY 95 Subcat PR3: TO W 78TH ST 97 Reach 1R: EX WETLAND 99 Reach 2R: RILEY CREEK 101 Pond 1P: WATER REUSE STORAGE 106 Pond 2P: BIOFILTRATION BASIN 1 546 Project Information Calculator Version:Version 4: July 2020 Project Name:Lighthouse Assisted Living -Chanhassen User Name / Company Name:Anders Melby -Civil Site Group Date:5/14/2025 Project Description:Construction for senior housing building with associated parking, landscaping, and utility improvements. Construction Permit?:No Site Information Retention Requirement (inches):1.1 Site's Zip Code:55317 Annual Rainfall (inches):29.9 Phosphorus EMC (mg/l):0.3 TSS EMC (mg/l):54.5 Total Site Area Land Cover A Soils (acres) B Soils (acres) C Soils (acres) D Soils (acres) Total (acres) Forest/Open Space -Undisturbed, protected forest/open space or reforested land 0 Managed Turf -disturbed, graded for yards or other turf to be mowed/managed 3.62 3.62 Impervious Area (acres).02 Total Area (acres)3.64 Site Areas Routed to BMPs Land Cover A Soils (acres) B Soils (acres) C Soils (acres) D Soils (acres) Total (acres) Forest/Open Space -Undisturbed, protected forest/open space or reforested land 0 Managed Turf -disturbed, graded for yards or other turf to be mowed/managed 3.25 3.25 Impervious Area (acres) Total Area (acres)3.25 547 Summary Information Performance Goal Requirement Performance goal volume retention requirement:80 ft3 Volume removed by BMPs towards performance goal:ft3 Percent volume removed towards performance goal % Annual Volume and Pollutant Load Reductions Post development annual runoff volume 2.0721 acre-ft Annual runoff volume removed by BMPs:0 acre-ft Percent annual runoff volume removed:0 % Post development annual particulate P load:0.9299 lbs Annual particulate P removed by BMPs:0 lbs Post development annual dissolved P load:0.761 lbs Annual dissolved P removed by BMPs:0 lbs Total P removed by BMPs 0 lbs Percent annual total phosphorus removed:0 % Post development annual TSS load:307.2 lbs Annual TSS removed by BMPs:94.5 lbs Percent annual TSS removed:31 % BMP Summary Performance Goal Summary BMP Name BMP Volume Capacity (ft3) Volume Recieved (ft3) Volume Retained (ft3) Volume Outflow (ft3) Percent Retained (%) 0 -Wet swale 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Volume Summary BMP Name Volume From Direct Watershed (acre-ft) Volume From Upstream BMPs (acre-ft) Volume Retained (acre-ft) Volume outflow (acre-ft) Percent Retained (%) 0 -Wet swale 1.822 0 0 1.822 0 Particulate Phosphorus Summary 548 BMP Name Load From Direct Watershed (lbs) Load From Upstream BMPs (lbs) Load Retained (lbs) Outflow Load (lbs) Percent Retained (%) 0 -Wet swale 0.8177 0 0 0.8177 0 Dissolved Phosphorus Summary BMP Name Load From Direct Watershed (lbs) Load From Upstream BMPs (lbs) Load Retained (lbs) Outflow Load (lbs) Percent Retained (%) 0 -Wet swale 0.669 0 0 0.669 0 Total Phosphorus Summary BMP Name Load From Direct Watershed (lbs) Load From Upstream BMPs (lbs) Load Retained (lbs) Outflow Load (lbs) Percent Retained (%) 0 -Wet swale 1.4867 0 0 1.4867 0 TSS Summary BMP Name Load From Direct Watershed (lbs) Load From Upstream BMPs (lbs) Load Retained (lbs) Outflow Load (lbs) Percent Retained (%) 0 -Wet swale 270.1 0 94.54 175.56 35 BMP Schematic 549 550 Project Information Calculator Version:Version 4: July 2020 Project Name:Lighthouse Assisted Living -Chanhassen User Name / Company Name:Anders Melby -Civil Site Group Date:5/14/2025 Project Description:Construction for senior housing building with associated parking, landscaping, and utility improvements. Construction Permit?:No Site Information Retention Requirement (inches):1.1 Site's Zip Code:55317 Annual Rainfall (inches):29.9 Phosphorus EMC (mg/l):0.3 TSS EMC (mg/l):54.5 Total Site Area Land Cover A Soils (acres) B Soils (acres) C Soils (acres) D Soils (acres) Total (acres) Forest/Open Space -Undisturbed, protected forest/open space or reforested land 0 Managed Turf -disturbed, graded for yards or other turf to be mowed/managed 2.31 2.31 Impervious Area (acres)1.34 Total Area (acres)3.65 Site Areas Routed to BMPs Land Cover A Soils (acres) B Soils (acres) C Soils (acres) D Soils (acres) Total (acres) Forest/Open Space -Undisturbed, protected forest/open space or reforested land 0 Managed Turf -disturbed, graded for yards or other turf to be mowed/managed 2.232 2.232 Impervious Area (acres)1.2718 Total Area (acres)3.5038 551 Summary Information Performance Goal Requirement Performance goal volume retention requirement:5351 ft3 Volume removed by BMPs towards performance goal:2843 ft3 Percent volume removed towards performance goal 53 % Annual Volume and Pollutant Load Reductions Post development annual runoff volume 4.1497 acre-ft Annual runoff volume removed by BMPs:0.372 acre-ft Percent annual runoff volume removed:9 % Post development annual particulate P load:1.8624 lbs Annual particulate P removed by BMPs:1.316 lbs Post development annual dissolved P load:1.524 lbs Annual dissolved P removed by BMPs:0.702 lbs Total P removed by BMPs 2.018 lbs Percent annual total phosphorus removed:60 % Post development annual TSS load:615.2 lbs Annual TSS removed by BMPs:551.3 lbs Percent annual TSS removed:90 % BMP Summary Performance Goal Summary BMP Name BMP Volume Capacity (ft3) Volume Recieved (ft3) Volume Retained (ft3) Volume Outflow (ft3) Percent Retained (%) Bioretention basin (with underdrain)208 2408 208 2200 9 Stormwater disconnection (Impervious disconnection) (PR1)36 71 36 35 51 Harvest and re-use/Cistern 2599 5007 2599 2408 52 Wet swale 0 35 0 35 0 Constructed stormwater pond 0 5007 0 5007 0 Sciclone Separator (MH4)0 1062 0 1062 0 Jellyfish Filter 0 2408 0 2408 0 Sciclone Separator (CBMH 12)0 3945 0 3945 0 Annual Volume Summary 552 BMP Name Volume From Direct Watershed (acre-ft) Volume From Upstream BMPs (acre-ft) Volume Retained (acre-ft) Volume outflow (acre-ft) Percent Retained (%) Bioretention basin (with underdrain)0.1716 0.2798 0.0359 0.4155 8 Stormwater disconnection (Impervious disconnection) (PR1)0.9674 0 0.0195 0.9479 2 Harvest and re-use/Cistern 0 0.5964 0.3166 0.2798 53 Wet swale 0 0.9479 0 0.9479 0 Constructed stormwater pond 0 0.5964 0 0.5964 0 Sciclone Separator (MH4)0.5964 0 0 0.5964 0 Jellyfish Filter 0 0.2798 0 0.2798 0 Sciclone Separator (CBMH 12)2.2253 0 0 2.2253 0 Particulate Phosphorus Summary BMP Name Load From Direct Watershed (lbs) Load From Upstream BMPs (lbs) Load Retained (lbs) Outflow Load (lbs) Percent Retained (%) Bioretention basin (with underdrain)0.077 0.1188 0.1598 0.036 82 Stormwater disconnection (Impervious disconnection) (PR1)0.4342 0 0.0088 0.4254 2 Harvest and re-use/Cistern 0 0.5066 0.2689 0.2377 53 Wet swale 0 0.4254 0 0.4254 0 Constructed stormwater pond 0 1.2664 0.7598 0.5066 60 Sciclone Separator (MH4)0.2677 0 0 0.2677 0 Jellyfish Filter 0 0.2377 0.1189 0.1188 50 Sciclone Separator (CBMH 12)0.9987 0 0 0.9987 0 Dissolved Phosphorus Summary BMP Name Load From Direct Watershed (lbs) Load From Upstream BMPs (lbs) Load Retained (lbs) Outflow Load (lbs) Percent Retained (%) Bioretention basin (with underdrain)0.063 0.4861 0.1448 0.4043 26 Stormwater disconnection (Impervious disconnection) (PR1)0.3552 0 0.0072 0.348 2 Harvest and re-use/Cistern 0 1.0361 0.55 0.4861 53 Wet swale 0 0.348 0 0.348 0 Constructed stormwater pond 0 1.0361 0 1.0361 0 Sciclone Separator (MH4)0.219 0 0 0.219 0 Jellyfish Filter 0 0.4861 0 0.4861 0 Sciclone Separator (CBMH 12)0.8171 0 0 0.8171 0 Total Phosphorus Summary 553 BMP Name Load From Direct Watershed (lbs) Load From Upstream BMPs (lbs) Load Retained (lbs) Outflow Load (lbs) Percent Retained (%) Bioretention basin (with underdrain)0.14 0.6049 0.3046 0.4403 54 Stormwater disconnection (Impervious disconnection) (PR1)0.7894 0 0.016 0.7734 2 Harvest and re-use/Cistern 0 1.5427 0.8189 0.7238 53 Wet swale 0 0.7734 0 0.7734 0 Constructed stormwater pond 0 2.3025 0.7598 1.5427 30 Sciclone Separator (MH4)0.4867 0 0 0.4867 0 Jellyfish Filter 0 0.7238 0.1189 0.6049 25 Sciclone Separator (CBMH 12)1.8158 0 0 1.8158 0 TSS Summary BMP Name Load From Direct Watershed (lbs) Load From Upstream BMPs (lbs) Load Retained (lbs) Outflow Load (lbs) Percent Retained (%) Bioretention basin (with underdrain)25.43 12.54 30.98 6.99000000000001 82 Stormwater disconnection (Impervious disconnection) (PR1)143.41 0 98.44 44.97 69 Harvest and re-use/Cistern 0 129.6 68.79 60.81 53 Wet swale 0 44.97 15.74 29.23 35 Constructed stormwater pond 0 324.01 194.41 129.6 60 Sciclone Separator (MH4)88.41 0 32.27 56.14 37 Jellyfish Filter 0 60.81 48.65 12.16 80 Sciclone Separator (CBMH 12)329.89 0 62.02 267.87 19 BMP Schematic 554 555 Civil Site Group, PC • 5000 Glenwood Avenue • Golden Valley • Minnesota • 55422 www.CivilSiteGroup.com • (612) 615-0060 Memorandum FROM: Anders Melby (Civil Site Group) DATE: 5-14-2025 RE: Pretreatment Removal Efficiencies for MH4 & CBMH12 The TSS removal efficiencies of SciClone Hydrodynamic Separators were modeled in the SHSAM software created by Barr Engineering on May 14, 2025. The inputs and resultant removal efficiency for each proposed SciClone are in the table below. The output data can be found in appended to this report. While one model SC-4-V SciClone structure provides the minimum 10% removal required reflected in the project’s proposed MIDS model, two units are specified for the two separate inlets to the underground storage (MH 13 and MH 14). While this will provide additional TSS removal than one single unit as modeled, the units were not modeled separately. SHSAM Input Data MH 4 CBMH 12 BMP Weather Station Weather Dates Particle Size NURP-PSD Area (ac) 0.319 1.203 Impervious (%) 83% 82% Hydraulic Length (ft) 315 650 Average Slope (%) 1% 0.5% CN (pervious) 84 84 Temp (f) Influent Conc (mg/l) Removal (%) 36.5% 18.8% 55 SciClone Golden Valley, MN 1995 - 2007 68 Thank you, Anders Melby, PE Civil Site Group 556 CBMH 12 Name Model Year Output "Removal" Efficiency (%)Annual Load (lbs)Load Removed (lbs)Deposit (in) SciCloneX 4 1995 20 298.1 59.8 0.57 SciCloneX 6 1995 26 298.1 76 0.32 SciCloneX 8 1995 32 298.1 96.4 0.23 SciCloneX 10 1995 36 298.1 108.4 0.17 SciCloneX 4 1996 20 301.3 61.6 0.59 SciCloneX 6 1996 26 301.3 78.2 0.33 SciCloneX 8 1996 33 301.3 98.8 0.24 SciCloneX 10 1996 37 301.3 110.9 0.17 SciCloneX 4 1997 16 366.2 60.6 0.58 SciCloneX 6 1997 21 366.2 77.9 0.33 SciCloneX 8 1997 27 366.2 99.8 0.24 SciCloneX 10 1997 31 366.2 112.9 0.17 SciCloneX 4 1998 19 260.5 50.4 0.48 SciCloneX 6 1998 25 260.5 64.1 0.27 SciCloneX 8 1998 31 260.5 81.3 0.19 SciCloneX 10 1998 35 260.5 91.5 0.14 SciCloneX 4 1999 21 163 33.8 0.32 SciCloneX 6 1999 26 163 42.8 0.18 SciCloneX 8 1999 33 163 54.2 0.13 SciCloneX 10 1999 37 163 60.8 0.09 SciCloneX 4 2000 17 332.2 57.9 0.55 SciCloneX 6 2000 22 332.2 74.2 0.32 SciCloneX 8 2000 28 332.2 94.7 0.23 SciCloneX 10 2000 32 332.2 106.9 0.16 SciCloneX 4 2001 21 261.8 53.9 0.52 SciCloneX 6 2001 26 261.8 68.4 0.29 SciCloneX 8 2001 33 261.8 86.5 0.21 SciCloneX 10 2001 37 261.8 97.2 0.15 SciCloneX 4 2002 18 293.3 54.2 0.52 SciCloneX 6 2002 24 293.3 69.3 0.29 SciCloneX 8 2002 30 293.3 88.2 0.21 SciCloneX 10 2002 34 293.3 99.6 0.15 SciCloneX 4 2003 18 276.3 50.2 0.48 SciCloneX 6 2003 23 276.3 64.1 0.27 SciCloneX 8 2003 30 276.3 81.7 0.2 SciCloneX 10 2003 33 276.3 92.2 0.14 SciCloneX 4 2004 20 263.3 52.1 0.5 SciCloneX 6 2004 25 263.3 66.3 0.28 SciCloneX 8 2004 32 263.3 84.1 0.2 SciCloneX 10 2004 36 263.3 94.7 0.14 SciCloneX 4 2005 18 327.7 57.9 0.55 SciCloneX 6 2005 23 327.7 74.2 0.32 SciCloneX 8 2005 29 327.7 94.6 0.23 SciCloneX 10 2005 33 327.7 107 0.16 SciCloneX 4 2006 19 190.6 35.7 0.34 SciCloneX 6 2006 24 190.6 45.5 0.19 SciCloneX 8 2006 30 190.6 57.8 0.14 SciCloneX 10 2006 34 190.6 65.1 0.1 SciCloneX 4 2007 18 219.5 38.6 0.37 SciCloneX 6 2007 22 219.5 49.4 0.21 SciCloneX 8 2007 29 219.5 63 0.15 SciCloneX 10 2007 32 219.5 71.3 0.11 Name Model Total Load (lbs)Total Load Removed (lbs)Removal Efficiency (%)Model Height (ft)Model Diameter (ft)Pipe Diameter (inches) SciCloneX 4 3554 667 18.8 3.5 4 24 SciCloneX 6 3554 850 23.9 4.8 6 36 SciCloneX 8 3554 1081 30.4 7.5 8 48 SciCloneX 10 3554 1219 34.3 9 10 60 MH 4 Name Model Year Output "Removal" Efficiency (%)Annual Load (lbs)Load Removed (lbs)Deposit (in) SciCloneX 4 1995 39 79.8 31.2 0.3 SciCloneX 6 1995 47 79.8 37.4 0.16 SciCloneX 8 1995 56 79.8 44.4 0.11 SciCloneX 10 1995 60 79.8 48.3 0.07 SciCloneX 4 1996 40 80.6 32.4 0.31 SciCloneX 6 1996 48 80.6 38.8 0.16 SciCloneX 8 1996 57 80.6 45.8 0.11 557 SciCloneX 10 1996 62 80.6 49.8 0.08 SciCloneX 4 1997 32 97.9 31.6 0.3 SciCloneX 6 1997 39 97.9 38.4 0.16 SciCloneX 8 1997 47 97.9 46.4 0.11 SciCloneX 10 1997 52 97.9 51 0.08 SciCloneX 4 1998 38 69.9 26.9 0.26 SciCloneX 6 1998 46 69.9 32.2 0.14 SciCloneX 8 1998 55 69.9 38.3 0.09 SciCloneX 10 1998 60 69.9 41.6 0.06 SciCloneX 4 1999 40 43.6 17.4 0.17 SciCloneX 6 1999 48 43.6 20.8 0.09 SciCloneX 8 1999 57 43.6 24.7 0.06 SciCloneX 10 1999 62 43.6 26.8 0.04 SciCloneX 4 2000 34 88.9 30.6 0.29 SciCloneX 6 2000 42 88.9 37 0.16 SciCloneX 8 2000 50 88.9 44.3 0.11 SciCloneX 10 2000 55 88.9 48.5 0.07 SciCloneX 4 2001 40 70 27.8 0.27 SciCloneX 6 2001 48 70 33.3 0.14 SciCloneX 8 2001 56 70 39.5 0.09 SciCloneX 10 2001 61 70 42.9 0.07 SciCloneX 4 2002 35 78.5 27.7 0.26 SciCloneX 6 2002 43 78.5 33.5 0.14 SciCloneX 8 2002 51 78.5 40.1 0.1 SciCloneX 10 2002 56 78.5 43.9 0.07 SciCloneX 4 2003 34 73.9 25.3 0.24 SciCloneX 6 2003 42 73.9 30.7 0.13 SciCloneX 8 2003 50 73.9 36.8 0.09 SciCloneX 10 2003 54 73.9 40.2 0.06 SciCloneX 4 2004 38 70.4 26.4 0.25 SciCloneX 6 2004 45 70.4 31.8 0.14 SciCloneX 8 2004 54 70.4 37.9 0.09 SciCloneX 10 2004 59 70.4 41.3 0.06 SciCloneX 4 2005 35 87.7 30.6 0.29 SciCloneX 6 2005 42 87.7 37 0.16 SciCloneX 8 2005 50 87.7 44.3 0.11 SciCloneX 10 2005 55 87.7 48.5 0.07 SciCloneX 4 2006 37 51 18.8 0.18 SciCloneX 6 2006 44 51 22.6 0.1 SciCloneX 8 2006 53 51 26.9 0.06 SciCloneX 10 2006 58 51 29.3 0.04 SciCloneX 4 2007 35 58.8 20.7 0.2 SciCloneX 6 2007 43 58.8 25 0.11 SciCloneX 8 2007 51 58.8 30 0.07 SciCloneX 10 2007 56 58.8 32.8 0.05 Name Model Total Load (lbs)Total Load Removed (lbs)Removal Efficiency (%)Model Height (ft)Model Diameter (ft)Pipe Diameter (inches) SciCloneX 4 951 347 36.5 3.5 4 24 SciCloneX 6 951 419 44 4.8 6 36 SciCloneX 8 951 499 52.5 7.5 8 48 SciCloneX 10 951 545 57.3 9 10 60 558 January 5, 2018 Project Number: 17-1039 Mr. Patrick Sarver Civil Site Group, Inc. 4931 W 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 RE: Geotechnical Exploration Report, Proposed Senior Living Facility, 1620 and 1660 Arboretum Boulevard, Chanhassen, Minnesota Dear Mr. Sarver, We have completed the geotechnical exploration report for the proposed senior living facility at 1620 and 1660 Arboretum Boulevard in Chanhassen, Minnesota. A brief summary of our results and recommendations is presented below. The soil borings completed with the building area encountered about 1 foot of vegetation and topsoil along with previously placed Fill that extended to depths ranging from about 12 to 29 feet below the ground surface. The Fill was composed of mostly clayey soils that contained organics, roots and fibers, and pieces of wood and concrete. Below the topsoil and Fill, the borings encountered native clayey soils that extended to the termination depths of the soil borings. The underlying native clays, in our opinion, are generally suitable for foundation support, but portions of the native clays had a soft consistency. The vegetation, topsoil, Fill and soft clay soils are not suitable for foundation support and will need to be removed from within the building and oversize areas and replaced with suitable compacted engineered fill. The deepest deposits of Fill and/or soft native soils (about 29 feet) was encountered on the western portion of the site near boring SB-1 with soil borings elsewhere generally encountering about 12 to 17 feet of Fill and/or soft native soil. Soil corrections extending to about 29 feet may not be cost effective and, if possible, moving the building to the east might result in reduced soil corrections and the associated costs. If the building will include a lower level, removal of a significant portion of the Fill soil would likely be incidental to construction. Specific details regarding our procedures, results and recommendations follow in the attached geotechnical exploration report. 559 Thank you for the opportunity to assist you on this project. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact Paul Gionfriddo at 612-271-8185 or Brett Maki at 612-269-4027. HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC Brett S. Maki, P.E. Paul Gionfriddo, P.E. Project Engineer Senior Engineer 560 G EOTECHNICAL EXPLORAT ION REPORT PROJECT: Proposed Senior Living Facility NW Quadrant of Highway 5 and Audubon Road Chanhassen, Minnesota PREPARED FOR: Civil Site Group, Inc. 4931 W 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 PREPARED BY: Haugo GeoTechnical Services LLC 2825 Cedar Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55407 Haugo GeoTechnical Services Project: 17-1039 January 5, 2018 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Paul Gionfriddo, P.E. Senior Engineer License Number 23093 Expires June 2018 561 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Project Description 1 1.2 Purpose 1 1.3 Site Description 1 1.4 Scope of Services 1 1.5 Documents Provided 2 1.6 Locations and Elevations 2 2.0 FIELD PROCEDURES 2 3.0 RESULTS 3 3.1 Soil Conditions 3 3.2 Groundwater 4 3.3 Laboratory Testing 5 3.4 OSHA Soil Classification 5 4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 4.1 Proposed Construction 5 4.2 Discussion 6 4.3 Foundation Preparation 7 4.4 Dewatering 8 4.5 Retaining Walls 8 4.6 Interior Slabs 9 4.7 Exterior Slabs 10 4.8 Site Grading and Drainage 10 4.9 Utilities 11 4.10 Bituminous Pavements 11 4.11 Materials and Compaction 12 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 12 5.1 Excavation 12 5.2 Observations 13 5.3 Backfill and Fills 13 5.4 Testing 13 5.5 Winter Construction 13 6.0 PROCEDURES 13 6.1 Soil Classification 13 6.2 Groundwater Observations 14 7.0 GENERAL 14 7.1 Subsurface Variations 14 7.2 Review of Design 14 7.3 Groundwater Fluctuations 14 7.4 Use of Report 15 7.5 Level of Care 15 APPENDIX 17 Boring Location Sketch GPS Boring Locations Soil Boring Logs, SB-1 thru SB-8 Descriptive Terminology 562 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description Civil Site Group, Inc. is preparing design and construction documents for a proposed senior living facility on two parcels located at 1620 and 1660 Arboretum Boulevard in Chanhassen MN. The project will also include constructing the associated parking, drive lanes, and underground utilities. Civil Site Group requested a geotechnical exploration to evaluate the suitability of site soil conditions to support the proposed senior living center and provide recommendations for site development. 1.2 Purpose The purpose of this geotechnical exploration was to characterize subsurface soil and groundwater conditions and provide recommendations for foundation design, pavement design and construction of the proposed senior living center. 1.3 Site Description The project site consists of two parcels totaling 3.5 acres and is located at 1620 and 1660 Arboretum Boulevard in Chanhassen, MN. The lot was mostly open, and grass covered, with mature trees along the perimeter of the site. Riley Creek runs along the northern border of the site from nearby Lake Ann, which is about 1000 feet to the north of the site. The ground surface slopes to the north, with elevations at the soil boring locations ranging from about 958 ½ to 972 ½ feet mean sea level (MSL). 1.4 Scope of Services Our services were performed in accordance with the Haugo GeoTechnical Services LLC proposal dated October 31, 2017 and under the terms of our General Conditions. Our scope of services was generally limited to the following tasks: • Completing five (5) standard penetration test borings in the building area, extending to a nominal depth of 30 feet. • Completing three (3) standard penetration test borings in the pavement areas, extending to a nominal depth of 10 feet. One boring was extended to 15 feet due to the presence of existing Fill soils. • Obtaining GPS coordinates and elevations at the soil boring locations. • Visually/manually classifying soil samples recovered from the soil borings. • Performing laboratory tests on select soil samples. • Preparing soil boring logs describing the materials encountered and the results of groundwater level measurements. • Preparing an engineering report describing soil and groundwater conditions, and providing recommendations for foundation and pavement design. 563 2 1.5 Documents Provided We provided with a Surveyor’s Certificate of the property which was prepared by Sunde Land Surveying, LLC and dated December 5, 2005. The Surveyor’s Certificate showed the property boundaries, city street(s) and existing topography. We were also provided a copy of a geotechnical engineering report prepared by STS Consultants dated January 13, 2006. The report presented the results of 10 soil borings taken across the project site. Briefly, the borings generally encountered about 6 to 15 feet of Fill overlying native glacial till deposits. The Fill was reported to contain “mixed organic bands” and possibly pieces of concrete. The report was prepared for construction of a surface parking lot with the potential for a future parking ramp. The report indicated that the soil conditions were generally suitable for support of a surface parking lot but soil corrections or a deep foundation system would be required to support a parking structure. 1.6 Locations and Elevations The soil boring locations were selected by Haugo GeoTechnical Services (HGTS) based on the anticipated construction and site access. The ground surface elevations at the soil boring locations were obtained by HGTS using GPS measuring equipment. The GPS measurements were based on the MN County Coordinate System (Carver County) in US Survey Feet using the GEOID09 (Conus) model. The approximate locations of the soil borings are shown on Figure 1, “Soil Boring Location Sketch,” in the Appendix. The GPS boring locations are shown on Figure 2 in the Appendix. 2.0 FIELD PROCEDURES The standard penetration test borings were performed on December 18th, 19th and 20th, 2017 by HGTS with a rotary drilling rig, using continuous flight augers to advance the boreholes. Representative samples were obtained from the borings, using the split-barrel sampling procedures in general accordance with ASTM Specification D-1586. In the split-barrel sampling procedure, a 2-inch O.D. split-barrel spoon is driven into the ground with a 140- pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampling spoon the last 12 inches of an 18-inch penetration is recorded as the standard penetration resistance value, or "N" value. The results of the standard penetration tests are indicated on the boring log. The samples were sealed in containers and provided to HGTS for testing and soil classification. Soil samples recovered from the borings were classified in general accordance with ASTM 2488, “Description and Identification of Soils (Visual/Manual Procedures). A field log of each boring was prepared by the HGTS drill crew. The logs contain visual classifications of the soil materials encountered during drilling, as well as the driller's interpretation of the subsurface conditions between samples and water observation notes. The final boring logs included with this report represent an interpretation of the field logs and include modifications based on visual/manual method observation of the samples. 564 3 The soil boring logs, general terminology for soil description and identification, and classification of soils for engineering purposes are also included in the appendix. The soil boring logs identify and describe the materials encountered, the relative density or consistency based on the Standard Penetration resistance (N-value, “blows per foot”) and groundwater observations. The strata changes were inferred from the changes in the samples and auger cuttings. The depths shown as changes between strata are only approximate. The changes are likely transitions, variations can occur beyond the location of the boring. 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Soil Conditions Building Borings Soil borings SB-1 through SB-5 were completed within the proposed building footprint. These soil borings encountered about 1 foot of topsoil at the surface that consisted predominantly of silty clay. The topsoil contained some roots and was black to dark brown in color. Below the topsoil the borings encountered Fill materials that extended to depths ranging from about 12 to 29 feet below the ground surface. The Fill consisted of a variety of soil types consisting primarily of sandy lean clay with lesser amounts of silty clay, silty sand and sandy clay. The Fill varied in color from brown to dark brown to grey to black, and contained traces of organics, fibers, roots, wood, gravel and concrete. Below the topsoil and Fill the soil borings generally encountered native alluvial soils and/or glacial till soils that extended to the termination depths of the soil borings. The alluvial soils consisted of lean clay that was grey to mottled brown and grey in color, and portions contained traces of gravel. The penetration resistance values (N-Values), shown as blows per foot (bpf) on the boring logs within the alluvial soils ranged from 2 to 9 bpf. These values indicate the alluvial soils had a soft to rather stiff consistency. The glacial till soils consisted of sandy lean clay that was grey in color and contained traces of gravel. N-Values within the glacial till soils ranged from 9 to 13 bpf. These values indicate the glacial till soils had a rather stiff to stiff consistency. Parking Lot Borings Soil borings SB-6 to SB-8 were completed within the proposed parking areas on the north and east sides of the building. These soil borings encountered about 1 foot of topsoil at the surface that consisted predominantly of silty clay. The topsoil was black to dark brown in color. Borings SB-6 and SB-7 encountered native glacial till soils below the topsoil that extended to the termination depths of the soil borings. The glacial till was composed of sandy lean clay that was brown in color and contained traces of gravel and rust staining. N-Values within the glacial till soils ranged from 6 to 17 bpf. These values indicate the glacial till soils h ad a medium to very stiff consistency. 565 4 Boring SB-8 encountered about 11 feet Fill below the topsoil. The Fill was composed of silty sand and sandy lean clay that was black in color and contained traces of organics, wood and gravel. The topsoil and Fill were underlain by native alluvial soils that extended to the termination depth of the boring. The alluvial soils consisted of lean clay that was mottled brown and grey in color and contained traces of rust staining and gravel. N-Values within the alluvial soils ranged from 6 to 12 bpf. These values indicate the glacial till soils had a medium to rather stiff consistency. 3.2 Groundwater Groundwater was encountered in soil borings SB-1 to SB-5 while drilling and sampling or after removing the augers from the boreholes at depths ranging from 17 to 25 feet below the ground surface, corresponding to an elevation range of 946 to 950 feet MSL. Water levels were measured on the dates as noted on the boring logs and the period of water level observations was relatively short. Given the cohesive nature the Fill, alluvial and glacial till soils encountered, it is likely that insufficient time was available for possible perched groundwater to seep into the bore hole and rise to its hydrostatic level. Groundwater monitoring wells or piezometers would be required to more accurately determine water levels. Seasonal and annual fluctuations in the groundwater levels should be expected. The water level of Riley Creek along the north border of the site ranges between about 946 to 950 feet MSL. Lake Ann is located about 1000 feet to the north of the site. The MN DNR reports the Ordinary High Water Level (OHW) of Lake Ann to be 955.5 feet MSL. 3.3 Laboratory Testing Laboratory moisture content tests and organic content tests were performed on selected samples recovered from the soil borings. Laboratory moisture contents ranged from about 14 to 26 percent. These values indicate that portions of the soils were likely well above their assumed optimum soil moisture contents. Organic contents ranged from about 3 ½ to 7 ½ percent indicating the soils were slightly organic to organic. Results of the laboratory moisture content tests are also shown on the boring logs adjacent to the sample tested. 566 5 Table 1. Summary of Laboratory Tests Boring Number Sample Number Depth (feet) Moisture Content (%)* Organic Content (%)* SB-1 S-25 5 14 3 ½ SB-1 S-26 7 ½ 19 ½ - SB-1 S-28 12 ½ 25 5 SB-1 S-31 20 26 4 ½ SB-2 S-16 7 ½ 18 ½ - SB-3 S-4 7 ½ 15 ½ - SB-4 S-49 5 15 - SB-4 S-50 7 ½ 24 ½ 7 SB-5 S-38 5 17 ½ - SB-6 S-65 5 19 ½ - SB-7 S-60 5 18 - SB-8 S-71 7 ½ 24 ½ 7 ½ *Moisture content and organic content tests were rounded to the nearest ½ percent 3.4 OSHA Soil Classification The soil encountered in the borings consisted predominantly of cohesive (clay) soils consisting of sandy lean clay and silty clay, meeting the ASTM Classifications CL and CL-ML. The site soils will generally be Type B soils under Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. 4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Proposed Construction Based on correspondence with Civil Site Group, we understand that specific plans for the senior living facility have not been finalized. Preliminary plans indicate that the building will likely be a single-story slab on-grade structure but could include a lower level. Specific structural drawings or design information was not available at the time of this report but based on the anticipated construction we assumed the building will include cast in-place concrete or masonry block foundation walls supported on concrete spread footings. Above grade construction is anticipated to include wood framing with a pitched roof and asphalt shingles. Based on these assumptions we anticipate perimeter footing loads on the order of 2 to 3 kips per lineal foot and interior column loads, if any, will be less than 100 kips. We anticipate the main floor will bear at or near existing site grades corresponding to about elevation 970. We further anticipate that soil bearing pressure(s) of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf) will be required for foundation support. We have attempted to describe our understanding of the project. If the proposed loads exceed these values or if the design or location of the proposed building changes, we should be informed. Additional analyses and revised recommendations may be necessary. 567 6 4.2 Discussion The borings completed with the building area (SB-1 to SB-5) encountered about 1 foot of vegetation and topsoil along with previously placed Fill that extended to depths ranging from 12 to 29 feet below the ground surface. Underlying the topsoil and Fill, the borings encountered native alluvial clays and/or glacial till clay soils that extended to the termination depths of the soil borings. The soil conditions encountered in our soil borings were generally consistent with those identified and described in the STS Consultants geotechnical report. The vegetation and topsoil are compressible and not suitable for foundation support and will need to be removed and replaced with suitable compacted engineered fill to provide adequate foundation support. The Fill was composed of a variety of soil types, consisting of sandy lean clay, silty clay, silty sand and clayey sand and contained organics, fibers, wood and concrete. In addition, the Fill varied in color with much of it black in color. Laboratory test results indicated it was slightly organic to organic. Organic soils or soil containing organic materials are generally compressible and poor-quality soil for foundation support. In addition, portions of the alluvial clay soils had a soft to rather soft consistency. The soft clays are also generally compressible and likewise, are poor-quality soil for foundation support. For these reasons we do not recommend supporting the proposed senior living facility on the Fill or soft alluvial clays. The underlying stiffer native alluvial clays and glacial till clay soils, in our opinion, are generally suitable for foundation support. The deepest deposits of Fill and/or soft native soils (about 29 feet) was encountered in soil boring SB-1 with soil borings SB-2 thru SB-5 generally encountering about 12 to 17 feet of Fill and/or soft native soil. Soil corrections extending to about 29 feet may not be cost effective and if possible, moving the building to the east might result in reduced soil corrections and the associated costs. If the building will include a lower level, removal of a significant portion of the Fill and soft native soil would likely be incidental to construction. As noted above much of the Fill was “black” in color and slightly organic to organic and will likely not be suitable for re-use as structural fill. It may be possible to reuse these soil in “green areas” such as landscaping berms. Soil borings SB-6 and SB-7 were completed in the proposed parking areas on the east side of the building. The ground surface in the vicinity of these borings was near elevation 958 ½. We assume the parking lot(s) will match the approximate main floor elevations of the building which is anticipated to be near 971. Because of that we anticipate that about 12 to 13 feet of fill could be required to attain parking lot grades. Groundwater was encountered in the soil borings while drilling and after auger removal from the boreholes at depths ranging from 17 to 29 feet below the ground surface. We anticipate that groundwater will be encountered during deeper soil corrections and anticipate that dewatering will be required. The following sections provide recommendations for supporting the proposed senior living facility on typical frost depth footing following soil corrections. 568 7 4.3 Foundation Preparation Excavations We recommend that all vegetation, topsoil, existing Fill, soft alluvial clays or other unsuitable soils be removed from the proposed building and oversize areas. Table 2 below summarizes the anticipated excavation depths at the soil boring locations. Excavation depths may vary and could be deeper. Table 2. Anticipated Grading Excavation Depths Boring Number Measured Surface Elevation (feet) Anticipated Excavation Depth (feet)* Anticipated Excavation Elevation (feet)* Groundwater Elevation (feet)* SB-1 970.0 29 941 950 SB-2 969.8 13 957 949 ½ SB-3 972.7 17 955 ½ 947 ½ SB-4 964.6 17 947 ½ 947 ½ SB-5 971.0 17 954 946 SB-6 958.7 1 (Parking) 957 ½ NE SB-7 958.3 1 (Parking) 957 ½ NE SB-8 967.9 1 (Parking) 967 NE *Excavation depths and elevations were rounded to the nearest ½ foot. NE = Not Encountered Oversizing In areas where the excavations extend below the proposed footing elevations, the excavation requires oversizing. We recommend the perimeter of the excavation be extended a foot outside the proposed footprint for every foot below footing grade (1H:1V oversizing). The purpose of the oversizing is to provide lateral support of the foundation. Fill Material Additional fill required to attain site grades can consist of any non-organic mineral soil provided it is free of debris or other deleterious materials. As mentioned in the Discussion section, the existing Fill was mostly black in color and slightly organic to organic. The existing Fill will generally not be suitable for re-use as structural fill. It may be possible to reuse these soil in “green areas” such as landscaping berms. If construction is anticipated to occur during the winter months we recommend granular material meeting the ASTM Classification SP or SP-SM for ease in compaction. For backfill/fill within 3 feet of the groundwater table we recommend using granular soil with less than 5 percent passing the number 200 sieve and at least 50 percent retained on the number 40 sieve. Backfilling We recommend that engineered fill placed to establish foundation grades be compacted to a minimum of 98 percent of its standard Proctor density (ASTM D 698). We recommend that engineered fill placed to establish floor slab grades be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its standard Proctor density (ASTM D 698). Granular fill classified as SP or SP-SM should be placed within 65 percent to 105 percent of its optimum moisture content as determined by the standard Proctor. Other fill soils, if any, should be placed within 3 percentage points above and 1 percentage point below its optimum moisture content as determined by the standard Proctor. All fill should be placed in thin lifts 569 8 and be compacted with a large self-propelled vibratory compactor operating in vibratory mode. In areas where fill depths will exceed 10 feet we recommend that compaction levels be increased to minimum of 100 percent of the materials standard Proctor density. Even with the increased compaction levels a construction delay may be appropriate to allow for post construction settlement of the fill mass. Fill and backfill placed on slopes, if any, must be “benched” into the underlying suitable soil to reduce the potential for slip planes to develop between the fill and underlying soil. We recommend “benching” or excavating into the slope at 5 feet vertical intervals to key the fill into the slope. We recommend each bench be a minimum of 10 feet wide. Foundations We recommend the perimeter footings bear a minimum of 42 inches below the exterior grade for frost protection. The interior footings may be placed immediately below the floor slab provided construction does not occur during below freezing weather conditions. Footings in unheated should bear at least 5 feet below grade for frost protection. We anticipate the foundations and floor slabs will bear on compacted engineered fill over native clay soils. With the building pad prepared as recommended it is our opinion the footings can be designed for a net allowable bearing pressure up to 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf). We anticipate total and differential settlement of the foundations will be less than 1 inch and ½ inch, respectively across an approximate 30-foot span. 4.4 Dewatering Groundwater was encountered in the soil borings while drilling and after auger removal from the boreholes at depths ranging from 17 to 29 feet below the ground surface. We anticipate that groundwater will be encountered during deeper soil corrections anticipate that dewatering will be required. Where dewatering is required we recommend the groundwater level be temporarily lowered to a minimum of 2 feet below the lowest anticipated excavation elevation to allow for construction. We recommend that a dewatering contractor be consulted to review the soil boring logs, develop a dewatering plan and evaluate the impact of dewatering on adjacent structures. 4.5 Below Grade Walls We anticipate that the proposed building will be a slab on-grade structure with no below grade or basement levels. However, we understand that building design has not been finalized and the building could include a lower level. Foundation walls or below grade (basement) walls will have lateral loads from the surrounding soil transmitted to them. We recommend general waterproofing of the below grade walls even with the use of free-draining backfill because of the potential cost impacts 570 9 related to seepage after construction. Unless a drainage composite is placed against the backs of the exterior perimeter below-grade walls we recommend that backfill placed within 2 feet of those wall consist of sand having less than 50 percent of the particles by weight passing the #40 sieve and less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing the #200 sieve. We recommend the balance of the backfill for the walls consist of sand however the sand may contain up to 20 percent of the particles by weight passing the #200 sieve. We recommend installing drain tile behind the below grade walls, adjacent to the wall footing and below the slab elevation. Preferably the drain tile should consist of perforated pipe embedded in gravel. A geotextile filter fabric should encase the pipe and gravel. The drain tile should be routed to a storm sewer, sump pump or other suitable disposal site. Active earth pressures can be used to design the below grade walls if the walls are allowed to rotate slightly. If wall rotation cannot be tolerated, then below grade wall design should be based on at-rest earth pressures. We recommend the following soil parameters be used for below grade/retaining wall design, shown in Table 3. These design parameters are based on the assumptions that the walls are drained, there are no surcharge loads within a horizontal distance equal to the height of the wall and the backfill is level. Table 3. Soil Parameters Soil Type Estimated Unit Weight (pcf) Estimated Friction Angle (degrees) At-Rest Pressure (pcf) Active Soil Pressure (pcf) Passive Soil Pressure (pcf) Sand (SP & SP-SM) 125 32 55 35 400 Clays (CL) 135 28 70 50 375 Resistance to lateral earth pressures will be provided by passive resistance against the wall footings and by sliding resistance along the bottom of the wall footings. We recommend a sliding coefficient of 0.35. This value does not include a factor of safety. 4.6 Interior Slabs We anticipate that the floor subgrade will consist of a “sand cushion” over compacted clay fill. For “clean” sand (SP or SP-SM) soils a subgrade modulus (k value) of 200 pounds per square inch of deflection may be used to design the floor. If floor coverings or coatings less permeable than the concrete slab will be used, we recommend that a vapor retarder or vapor barrier be placed immediately beneath the slab. Some contractors prefer to bury the vapor barrier or vapor retarder beneath a layer of sand to reduce curling and shrinkage, but this practice often traps water between the slab and vapor retarder or barrier. Regardless of where the vapor retarder or vapor barrier is placed, we recommend consulting the floor covering manufacturer regarding the appropriate type, use and installation of the vapor retarder or vapor barrier to preserve the warranty. 571 10 We recommend following all state and local building codes in regards to a radon mitigation plan beneath interior slabs. 4.7 Exterior Slabs Portions of the exterior slabs will likely be underlain by silty and clayey soils which are considered moderately frost susceptible. If the silty/clayey soils become saturated and freeze, significant heave may occur. This heave can be a nuisance in front of doors and at other critical grade areas. One way to help reduce the potential for heaving is to remove the frost - susceptible soils below the slabs down to bottom of footing grades, and replace them with non-frost-susceptible backfill consisting of sand having less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing the number 200 sieve. Sand meeting this gradation is likely not available on - site. If this approach is used and the excavation bottoms terminate in non-free draining granular soil we recommend a drain tile be installed along the bottom outer edges of the excavation to collect and remove any water that may accumulate within the sand. The bottom of the excavation should be graded away from the building. If the banks of the excavations to remove the frost-susceptible soils are not sloped, abrupt transitions between the frost-susceptible and non-frost-susceptible backfill will exist along which unfavorable amounts of differential heaving may occur. Such transitions could exist between exterior slabs and sidewalks, between exterior slabs and pavements and along the slabs themselves if the excavations are confined to only the building entrances. To address this issue we recommend sloping the excavations to remove frost-susceptible soils at a minimum 3:1 (horizontal:vertical) gradient. An alternative method of reducing frost heave is to place a minimum of 2 inches of extruded polystyrene foam insulation beneath the slabs and extending it about 4 feet beyond the slabs. The insulation will reduce frost penetration into the underlying soil and reduce heave. Six to 12 inches of granular soil is typically placed over the insulation to protect it during construction. Another alternative for reducing frost heave is to support the slabs on frost depth footings. A void space of at least 4 inches should be provided between the slab and the underlying soil to allow the soil to heave without affecting the slabs. 4.8 Site Grading and Drainage We recommend the site be graded to provide positive run-off away from the proposed building. We recommend landscaped areas be sloped a minimum of 6 inches within 10 feet of the building and slabs be sloped a minimum of 2 inches. In addition , we recommend downspouts with long splash blocks or extensions. We recommend the lowest floor grades be constructed to maintain at least a 4-foot separation between the lowest floor slab and observed groundwater and at least a 2-foot separation between the lowest floor slab and 100 year flood levels of any adjacent surface water features such as wetlands, ponds or creeks. 572 11 4.9 Utilities We anticipate that the utilities will be supported on engineered fill placed following soil corrections or native alluvial and glacial till soils which in our opinion are suitable for pipe support. We recommend removing all topsoil, Fill, very loose/soft or other unsuitable soil, if encountered, beneath utilities prior to placement. We recommend bedding material be thoroughly compacted around the pipes. We recommend trench backfill above the pipes be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent beneath slabs and pavements, the exception being within 3 feet of the proposed pavement subgrade, where 100 percent of standard Proctor density is required. In landscaped areas we recommend a minimum compaction of 90 percent. Groundwater was encountered in the soil borings while drilling and after auger removal from the boreholes at depths ranging from 17 to 29 feet below the ground surface. We do not anticipate that groundwater will be encountered during utility construction and do not anticipate that dewatering will be required. 4.10 Bituminous Pavements We recommend that pavements be designed and constructed in accordance with City of Chanhassen standard plates. The following paragraphs provide general pavement recommendations in the absence of City of Chanhassen standard plates. We anticipate that the parking areas will be used predominantly by automobiles and light trucks with occasional use by heavier vehicles including but not limited to food service delivery trucks and garbage trucks. Based on the assumed traffic types we anticipate that both light duty and heavy duty pavements will be required. Based on the assumed traffic types we estimate the light duty pavements will be subjected to Equivalent Single Axel Loads (ESAL’s) up to 50,000 over a design life of 20 years and heavy duty pavements will be subjected to ESAL’s up to about 75,000 over a 20 year design life. We recommend removing all vegetation, topsoil or other unsuitable materials from beneath the pavement subgrade. We recommend the existing Fill soils be further evaluated during construction. Prior to placing the aggregate base we recommend compacting and proof- rolling the subgrade soil to provide a more uniform surface and to identify soft, weak, loose or unstable areas that may require additional subcuts. As mentioned in the Discussion section, soil borings SB-6 and SB-7 were completed in the proposed parking areas on the east side of the building. The ground surface in the vicinity of these borings was near elevation 958 ½. We assume the parking lot(s) will match the approximate main floor elevations of the building which is anticipated to be near 971. Because of that we anticipate that about 12 to 13 feet of fill will be required to attain parking lot grades. Backfill to attain pavement subgrade elevation can consist of any mineral soil provided it is free of organic material or other deleterious materials. Granular fill classified as SP or SP-SM, if used, should be placed within 65 percent to 105 percent of its optimum moisture content as 573 12 determined by the standard Proctor. Other fill soils should be placed with moisture contents within a range of 1 percentage point below and 3 percentage points above its optimum moisture content. The upper 3 feet of fill and backfill should be compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of its standard Proctor maximum dry density. R-Value testing was beyond the scope of this project. The soil borings generally encountered cohesive soils corresponding to the ASTM Classification of CL which typically have R-Values ranging from 6 to 18. It is our opinion that an R-Value of 12 can be used for pavement design. It should be noted that the pavement sections presented below are not absolutes. Depending on serviceability expectations, material availability, and cost, there will be circumstances under which alternative sections will be more practicable. The placement of a sand subbase to support the pavements could potentially reduce the required pavement sections. For light duty pavements subjected to a maximum of 50,000 ESAL’s and a subgrade R-Value of 12 we recommend a pavement section consisting of a minimum of 3 ½ inches of bituminous over a minimum of 9 inches of MN/DOT Class 5 aggregate base. For medium to heavy duty pavements subjected to a maximum of 75,000 ESAL’s and a subgrade R-Value of 12 we recommend a pavement section consisting of a minimum of 4 inches of bituminous over a minimum of 12 inches of MN/DOT Class 5 aggregate base. 4.11 Materials and Compaction We recommend specifying aggregate base meeting MN/DOT Class 5 aggregate base. We recommend the aggregate base be compacted to 100 percent of its maximum standard Proctor. We recommend that the bituminous pavements be compacted to at least 92 percent of the maximum theoretical density. We recommend specifying concrete that has a minimum 28 day compressive strength of 4,000 psi, and a modulus of rupture of at least 600 psi. We recommend Type I cement meeting the requirements of ASTM C150. We recommend specifying 5 to 7 percent entrained air for exposed concrete to provide resistance to freeze-thaw deterioration. We also recommend using a water/cement ratio of 0.45 or less for concrete exposed to deicers. 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 5.1 Excavation The soil encountered in the borings consisted predominantly of cohesive (clay) soils meeting the ASTM Classifications CL and CL-ML. The site soils will generally be Type B soils under Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. Temporary excavations in Type C soils should be constructed at a minimum of 1 foot horizontal to every 1 foot vertical within excavations. Slopes constructed in this manner may 574 13 still exhibit surface sloughing. If site constraints do not allow the construction of slopes with these dimensions then temporary shoring may be required. 5.2 Observations A geotechnical engineer or qualified engineering technician should observe the excavation subgrade to evaluate if the subgrade soils are similar to those encountered in the borings and adequate to support the proposed construction. 5.3 Backfill and Fills Site soils that will be excavated and reused as backfill and fill appear to be above their assumed optimum moisture content. We anticipate it might be necessary to moisture condition (dry) these soils to achieve the recommended compaction. We recommend that fill and backfill be placed in lifts not exceeding 4 to 12 inches, depending on the size of the compactor and materials used. 5.4 Testing We recommend density tests of backfill and fills placed during construction of the facility. Samples of the proposed materials should be submitted to our laboratory prior to placement for evaluation of their suitability and to determine their optimum moisture content and maximum dry density (Standard Proctor). 5.5 Winter Construction If site grading and construction is anticipated to proceed during cold weather, all snow and ice should be removed from cut and fill areas prior to additional grading and placement of fill. No fill should be placed on frozen soil and no frozen soil should be used as fill or backfill. Concrete delivered to the site should meet the temperature requirements of ASTM and/or ACI. Concrete should not be placed on frozen soil. Concrete should be protected from freezing until the necessary strength is obtained. Frost should not be permitted to penetrate below the footings. 6.0 PROCEDURES 6.1 Soil Classification The drill crew chief visually and manually classified the soils encountered in the boring s in general accordance with ASTM D 2488, “Description and Identification of Soils (Visual- Manual Procedure)”. Soil terminology notes are included in the Appendix. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review of the field classification by a geotechnical engineer. Samples will be retained for a period of 30 days. 575 14 6.2 Groundwater Observations Immediately after taking the final samples in the bottom of the borings, the hole was checked for the presence of groundwater. Again, at the end of the drilling day, the borings were re- checked for the presence of groundwater with the levels and time delay being noted on the boring logs. 7.0 GENERAL 7.1 Subsurface Variations The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based on data obtained from a limited number of soil borings. Variations can occur away from the borings, the nature of which may not become apparent until additional exploration work is completed or construction is conducted. A reevaluation of the recommendations in this report should be made after performing on-site observations during construction to note the characteristics of any variations. The variations may result in additional foundation costs and it is suggested that a contingency be provided for this purpose. It is recommended that we be retained to perform the observation and testing program during construction to evaluate whether the design is as expected, if any design changes have affected the validity of our recommendations, and if our recommendations have been correctly interpreted and implemented in the designs, specifications and construction methods. This will allow correlation of the soil conditions encountered during construction to the soil borings and will provide continuity of professional responsibility. 7.2 Review of Design This report is based on the design of the proposed structures as related to us for preparation of this report. It is recommended that we be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of the design and specifications. With the review we will evaluate whether any changes have affected the validity of the recommendations and whether our recommendations have been correctly interpreted and implemented in the design and specifications. 7.3 Groundwater Fluctuations We made water level measurements in the borings at the times and under the conditions stated on the boring logs. The data was interpreted in the text of this report. The period of observation was relatively short and fluctuations in the groundwater level may occur due to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, spring thaw, drainage, and other seasonal and annual factors not evident at the time the observations were made. Design drawings and specifications and construction planning should recognize the possibility of fluctuations. 576 15 7.4 Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of Civil Site Group, Inc. and their design team to use to design the proposed structures and prepare construction documents. In the absence of our written approval, we make no representation and assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. The data, analysis and recommendations may not be appropriate for other structures or purposes. We recommend that parties contemplating other structures or purposes contact us. 7.5 Level of Care Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC has used the degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised under similar circumstance by members of the profession currently practicing in this locality. No warranty expressed or implied is made. 577 APPENDIX 578 SB-4 SB-5 Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC 2825 Cedar Avenue S. Minneapolis, MN 55407 Figure #: 1 Drawn By: AY Date: 12/16/17 Scale: None Project #: 17-1039 Soil Boring Location Sketch 1620 & 1660 Arboretum Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota Approximate Soil Boring Location SB-6 SB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-7 SB-8 579 Silty Clay, black, moist. (Topsoil) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, dark brown and black, moist. (FILL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, trace Organics, trace Wood, grey and black, moist. (FILL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, trace Organics, trace Wood, black, moist. (FILL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, trace Organics, trace Wood, brown and black, moist. (FILL) Clayey Sand, trace Gravel, trace Organics, with Concrete at 22 1/2 feet, with Wood at 27 1/2 feet, black, wet. (FILL) (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, grey, moist, rather stiff. (Glacial Till) Bottom of borehole at 31.0 feet. AU 23 SS 24 SS 25 SS 26 SS 27 SS 28 SS 29 SS 30 SS 31 SS 32 SS 33 SS 34 SS 35 8-3-4 (7) 4-6-7 (13) 4-3-5 (8) 3-3-5 (8) 3-2-8 (10) 4-4-12 (16) 2-2-4 (6) 1-1-1 (2) 2-3-18 (21) 2-1-2 (3) 4-3-3 (6) 4-4-5 (9) 14 19.5 25 26 NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 970 ft LOGGED BY MS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY JC DATE STARTED 12/19/17 COMPLETED 12/19/17 AT TIME OF DRILLING 20.00 ft / Elev 950.00 ft AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0 5 10 15 20 25 30 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 MOISTURE CONT.(%)NOTESPAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-1 CLIENT Civil Site Group PROJECT NUMBER 17-1039 PROJECT NAME Facility Senior Living PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 1/5/18 13:43 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\17-1039 13625 CREST AVENUE NE.GPJHaugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55407 Telephone: 612-729-2959 580 Silty Clay, black, moist. (Topsoil) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, trace Roots, brown and dark brown, moist. (FILL) Silty Sand, fine to coarse grained, with Gravel, brown, moist. (FILL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown and dark brown, moist. (FILL) Silty Clay, black, moist. (FILL) (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, grey, moist, medium. (Alluvium) (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, rust staining, mottled brown and grey, moist, medium. (Alluvium) (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, grey, moist, rather stiff to stiff. (Glacial Till) Bottom of borehole at 31.0 feet. AU 13 SS 14 SS 15 SS 16 SS 17 SS 18 SS 19 SS 20 SS 21 SS 22 3-3-5 (8) 2-3-4 (7) 2-3-3 (6) 3-11-7 (18) 4-3-3 (6) 3-5-3 (8) 3-5-8 (13) 5-4-6 (10) 3-5-7 (12) 18.5 NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 969.8 ft LOGGED BY MS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY JC DATE STARTED 12/18/17 COMPLETED 12/18/17 AT TIME OF DRILLING 20.00 ft / Elev 949.80 ft AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING 20.40 ft / Elev 949.40 ft with Cave-In Depth of 24 feet HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0 5 10 15 20 25 30 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 MOISTURE CONT.(%)NOTESPAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-2 CLIENT Civil Site Group PROJECT NUMBER 17-1039 PROJECT NAME Facility Senior Living PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 1/5/18 13:43 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\17-1039 13625 CREST AVENUE NE.GPJHaugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55407 Telephone: 612-729-2959 581 Silty Clay, black, moist. (Topsoil) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, trace Organics, brown and black, moist. (FILL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown, moist. (FILL) Clayey Sand, fine to medium grained, with Gravel, trace Wood, dark brown, moist. (FILL) (CL) Lean Clay, trace Gravel, grey, moist to wet, rather soft to medium. (Alluvium) (CL) Lean Clay, trace Gravel, mottled brown and grey, moist to wet, mediuim. (Alluvium) (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown, moist, rather stiff. (Glacial Till) (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, grey, moist, stiff. (Glacial Till) Bottom of borehole at 31.0 feet. AU 1 SS 2 SS 3 SS 4 SS 5 SS 6 SS 7 SS 8 SS 9 SS 10 SS 11 SS 12 2-3-5 (8) 2-3-4 (7) 2-3-6 (9) 3-3-4 (7) 4-5-7 (12) 6-9-10 (19) 2-3-4 (7) 1-2-3 (5) 2-3-3 (6) 3-5-5 (10) 3-6-7 (13) 15.5 NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 972.7 ft LOGGED BY MS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY JC DATE STARTED 12/19/17 COMPLETED 12/19/17 AT TIME OF DRILLING 25.00 ft / Elev 947.70 ft AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered with Cave-In Depth of 7 feet HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0 5 10 15 20 25 30 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 MOISTURE CONT.(%)NOTESPAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-3 CLIENT Civil Site Group PROJECT NUMBER 17-1039 PROJECT NAME Facility Senior Living PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 1/5/18 13:43 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\17-1039 13625 CREST AVENUE NE.GPJHaugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55407 Telephone: 612-729-2959 582 Silty Clay, dark brown, moist. (Topsoil) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown, moist. (FILL) Silty Clay, trace Gravel, black, moist. (FILL) Silty Clay, trace Organics, grey and black, moist. (FILL) (CL) Lean Clay, mottled brown and grey, wet, soft. (Alluvium) (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, grey, moist, rather stiff to stiff. (Glacial Till) Bottom of borehole at 31.0 feet. AU 47 SS 48 SS 49 SS 50 SS 51 SS 52 SS 53 SS 54 SS 55 SS 56 SS 57 3-3-4 (7) 2-3-4 (7) 3-5-5 (10) 2-3-4 (7) 1-1-1 (2) 1-2-2 (4) 3-7-8 (15) 3-5-7 (12) 6-5-8 (13) 3-6-9 (15) 15 24.5 NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 964.6 ft LOGGED BY MS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY JC DATE STARTED 12/20/17 COMPLETED 12/20/17 AT TIME OF DRILLING 17.00 ft / Elev 947.60 ft AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered with Cave-In Depth of 5 feet HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0 5 10 15 20 25 30 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 MOISTURE CONT.(%)NOTESPAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-4 CLIENT Civil Site Group PROJECT NUMBER 17-1039 PROJECT NAME Facility Senior Living PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 1/5/18 13:43 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\17-1039 13625 CREST AVENUE NE.GPJHaugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55407 Telephone: 612-729-2959 583 Silty Clay, black, moist. (Topsoil) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, trace Wood, trace Fibers, brown, moist to wet. (FILL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, trace Fibers, brown and grey, wet. (FILL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, trace Fibers, grey and black, wet. (FILL) Silty Sand, fine to coarse grained, with Gravel, black, wet. (FILL) (CL) Lean Clay, trace Gravel, mottled brown and grey, wet, rather soft to rather stiff. (Alluvium) (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, grey, moist, rather stiff to stiff. (Glacial Till) Bottom of borehole at 31.0 feet. AU 36 SS 37 SS 38 SS 39 SS 40 SS 41 SS 42 SS 43 SS 44 SS 45 SS 46 3-3-5 (8) 3-3-4 (7) 2-2-3 (5) 1-1-2 (3) 2-2-2 (4) 4-6-7 (13) 2-3-2 (5) 2-5-4 (9) 3-6-7 (13) 3-5-7 (12) 17.5 NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 971 ft LOGGED BY MS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY JC DATE STARTED 12/19/17 COMPLETED 12/19/17 AT TIME OF DRILLING 25.00 ft / Elev 946.00 ft AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered with Cave-In Depth of 10 feet HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0 5 10 15 20 25 30 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 MOISTURE CONT.(%)NOTESPAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-5 CLIENT Civil Site Group PROJECT NUMBER 17-1039 PROJECT NAME Facility Senior Living PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 1/5/18 13:43 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\17-1039 13625 CREST AVENUE NE.GPJHaugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55407 Telephone: 612-729-2959 584 Silty Clay, black, moist. (Topsoil) (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, rust staining, brown, moist, medium to stiff. (Glacial Till) Bottom of borehole at 11.0 feet. AU 63 SS 64 SS 65 SS 66 SS 67 2-3-3 (6) 2-3-4 (7) 4-5-6 (11) 4-6-7 (13) 19.5 NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 958.7 ft LOGGED BY MS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY JC DATE STARTED 12/20/17 COMPLETED 12/20/17 AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0 5 10 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 MOISTURE CONT.(%)NOTESPAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-6 CLIENT Civil Site Group PROJECT NUMBER 17-1039 PROJECT NAME Facility Senior Living PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 1/5/18 13:43 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\17-1039 13625 CREST AVENUE NE.GPJHaugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55407 Telephone: 612-729-2959 585 Silty Clay, dark brown, moist. (Topsoil) (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, rust staining, brown, moist, rather stiff to very stiff. (Glacial Till) Bottom of borehole at 11.0 feet. AU 58 SS 59 SS 60 SS 61 SS 62 3-4-6 (10) 2-5-6 (11) 5-8-9 (17) 3-5-5 (10) 18 NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 958.3 ft LOGGED BY MS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY JC DATE STARTED 12/20/17 COMPLETED 12/20/17 AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered with Cave-In Depth of 6 feet HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0 5 10 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 MOISTURE CONT.(%)NOTESPAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-7 CLIENT Civil Site Group PROJECT NUMBER 17-1039 PROJECT NAME Facility Senior Living PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 1/5/18 13:43 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\17-1039 13625 CREST AVENUE NE.GPJHaugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55407 Telephone: 612-729-2959 586 Silty Clay, black, moist. (Topsoil) Silty Sand, fine to medium grained, with Gravel, black, moist. (FILL) Silty Clay, trace Organics, trace Wood, black, moist. (FILL) (CL) Lean Clay, trace Gravel, rust staining, mottled brown and grey, medium to rather stiff. (Alluvium) Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. AU 68 SS 69 SS 70 SS 71 SS 72 SS 73 SS 74 3-6-7 (13) 1-1-2 (3) 2-3-4 (7) 3-2-3 (5) 2-2-4 (6) 3-5-7 (12) 24.5 NOTES GROUND ELEVATION 967.9 ft LOGGED BY MS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: CHECKED BY JC DATE STARTED 12/20/17 COMPLETED 12/20/17 AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered with Cave-In Depth of 3 feet HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches FINES CONTENT (%) 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 PL LLMC DEPTH(ft)0 5 10 15 GRAPHICLOGMATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE TYPENUMBERRECOVERY %(RQD)BLOWCOUNTS(N VALUE) SPT N VALUE 20 40 60 80 MOISTURE CONT.(%)NOTESPAGE 1 OF 1 BORING NUMBER SB-8 CLIENT Civil Site Group PROJECT NUMBER 17-1039 PROJECT NAME Facility Senior Living PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen, MN GEOTECH BH PLOTS - GINT STD US LAB.GDT - 1/5/18 13:43 - C:\USERS\PUBLIC\DOCUMENTS\BENTLEY\GINT\PROJECTS\17-1039 13625 CREST AVENUE NE.GPJHaugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55407 Telephone: 612-729-2959 587 588 Metropolitan District Waters Edge Building 1500 County Road B-2 West Roseville, MN 55113 Page 1 of 3 June 6, 2025 Rachel Jeske, Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota, 55317 SUBJECT: Eden Springs Senior Living MnDOT Review #S25-022 NW quadrant of W 78th St and Audubon Rd Chanhassen, Carver County Dear Rachel Jeske, Thank you for your submittal of site plans for the proposed Eden Springs Senior Living. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has reviewed the documents, received 5/25/2025, and has the following comments: Water Resources A MnDOT drainage permit may be required before development occurs. The permit applicant shall demonstrate that the off-site runoff entering MnDOT drainage system(s) and/or right of way will not increase. The drainage permit application, including the information below, should be submitted online to: https://olpa.dot.state.mn.us/OLPA/. Please upload this letter with the drainage permit application. The following information must be submitted with the drainage permit application: 1. Grading plans, drainage plans, and hydraulic calculations demonstrating that proposed flows to MnDOT right of way remain the same as existing conditions or are reduced. 2. Existing and proposed drainage area maps with flow arrows and labeling that corresponds with the submitted calculations. 3. Hydro CAD model and PDF of output for the 2, 10, and 100-year Atlas 14 storm events. Once a drainage permit application is submitted, a thorough review will be completed and additional information may be requested. Please contact Jason Swenson, Water Resources Engineering, at jason.swenson@state.mn.us or 651-234-7539 with any questions. Noise MnDOT's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often result in complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.0030 states that municipalities having the authority to regulate land use shall take all reasonable measures to prevent the establishment of land use activities, listed in the MPCA's Noise Area Classification (NAC), anywhere that the establishment of the land use would result in immediate violations of established State noise standards. 589 Page 2 of 3 MnDOT policy regarding development adjacent to existing highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures in such developed areas. The project proposer is required to assess the existing noise situation and take the action deemed necessary to minimize the impact to the proposed development from any highway noise. If you have any questions regarding MnDOT's noise policy please contact Natalie Ries in Metro District’s Noise and Air Quality Unit at 651-234-7681 or Natalie.Ries@state.mn.us. Permits Any work that affects MnDOT right of way will require an appropriate permit. All permits are available and must be applied at: https://olpa.dot.state.mn.us/OLPA/. Upload this letter when applying for permits. For questions regarding permit submittal requirements, please contact Buck Craig of MnDOT’s Metro District Permits Section at buck.craig@state.mn.us or 651-775-0405. Review Submittal Options MnDOT’s goal is to complete reviews within 30 calendar days. Review materials received electronically can be processed more rapidly. Do not submit files via a cloud service or SharePoint link. In order of preference, review materials may be submitted as: 1. Email documents and plans to metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us. Attachments may not exceed 20 MB (megabytes) per email. Documents can be zipped as well. If multiple emails are necessary, number each email. 2. Files over 20 MB can also be uploaded to MnDOT’s Web Transfer Client site: https://mft.dot.state.mn.us. Contact metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us, and staff will create a shared folder in which files can be uploaded to. Please send an accompanying email with a narrative for the development. You are welcome to contact me at regina.burstein@state.mn.us with any questions. Sincerely, Regina Burstein Senior Planner 590 Page 3 of 3 Copy sent via email: Jason Swenson, Water Resources Buck Craig, Permits Yuping Wu, Right of Way Tessa Kolan, Traffic Amrish Patel, Transit Natalie Ries, Noise Diane Langenbach, Area Coordinator Mohammad Dehdashti, Design Michael Kowski, Maintenance Molly McCormick, Ped/Bike/ADA Planning Jordan Olson, Surveying Tod Sherman, Planning Cameron Muhic, Planning Scott Shaffer, Planning Joseph Widing, Metropolitan Council 591 From: To:DL Projects Public Comments Subject:NO to proposed memory care facility adjacent to Lake Ann Park Date:Tuesday, September 2, 2025 9:38:59 AM To the members of the Planning Commission: I am writing to voice my opposition to the proposed Memory care development adjacent to Lake Ann Park for the following reasons: - Lake Ann Park is the "central park" of Chanhassen and an important gathering place for our community. The variances proposed to the regulations below will allow this project to encroach on our wetlands, destroy the habitat of wildlife and remove dozens of trees. -Chapter 20, Article 20-VI, Wetland Management District -Chapter 20, Article 20-VII, Shoreland Management District - The construction and traffic in the area caused by the project will be a detriment to the area. Kids and community members use that area for bike riding, walking and exercising. These recreational uses are part of the broad appeal of the area surrounding Lake Ann Park. Please don't start chipping away at this peaceful part of our community. -I could find no information on the track record of the developer to deliver projects of this type. The agenda references a prior proposal that never went forward. Does the development team have the capacity to develop this project and to operate it responsibly? The City has the responsibility to make sure that the memory care facility, if approved, provides high quality care to the residents. If not, Chanhassen will be in the news should the operator be accused of negligence to seniors. Also, does the project have financing commitments? If not, it will stall yet again. -The average cost of memory care in Minnesota is $6500-$7000 per month, and is not covered by Medicare. This is well out of reach of the average resident of Carver County. While there is need for such care, this project will be a money making enterprise. There is nothing wrong with that, but I urge the City to consider requiring a portion of these units to be affordable to those at least 80-100% of area median income. Will they be able to lease these units? Perhaps, to wealthy families from out of our area. -Chanhassen has approved projects nearby that have already taken away from the appeal of the Lake Ann Park area. The industrial/office project on the corner of Route 5 and Audubon destroyed a huge amount of acreage that was home to an abundance of wildlife. I can tell you that the surrounding residents hate it and resent the City's current trend of overdevelopment. We moved here in 2017 as did many others for the open space and controlled development. I urge the commission to vote NO on the proposed development. Sincerely, Heather Lawler, Stone Creek Drive, Chanhassen 592 From: DL Projects Public Comments Subject:Eden Springs Project Proposal Date:Tuesday, May 27, 2025 10:09:36 AM Good morning, I’m emailing my feedback regarding the proposal for the eden springs development project. While I can appreciate the need for senior housing and tax revenue from the development, I have concerns about how close this is to Lake Ann Park. I think the park is an invaluable asset to the community and the nature around it should be preserved for current and future residents. In addition to preserving the natural beauty around the park, I have concerns with the potential increased traffic flow on this commonly biked and walked trail. I hope the city prioritizes the beauty this park brings to the community and denies the application for development. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Charles Boylan 593 From: To:DL Projects Public Comments Subject:No to Eden Spring Senior Living; YES to a Golf Course Date:Tuesday, May 27, 2025 9:34:35 PM Dear Chanhassen City Council, I'm writing to express my strong support for the golf course that was once proposed at 1620 Arboretum Blvd and my concerns about replacing it with a senior living facility While I value our senior residents, a senior facility offers limited tax revenue, places added strain on emergency services, and reduces age diversity and land flexibility. It also misses the opportunity to create a space that benefits the broader community. In contrast, a golf course would boost our local economy through tourism, property value growth, job creation, and tax revenue. It provides outdoor recreation, promotes health and social connection, and preserves green space that enhances our city’s appearance. Golf courses also support environmental benefits and can host events for all ages, making them a vibrant, long-term community asset. I hope the council will prioritize the golf course plan, which I believe better serves the future of our city. Sincerely, Ellen Bastian 7142 Alphabet Street 594 595 Application: Site Plan Review (Planning Case #2025-10) Staff Report Date: September 16, 2025 Drafted By: Rachel Jeske, Planner Joe Seidl, Water Resources Engineer Mackenze Grunig, Project Engineer Planning Commission Review Date: September 2, 2025 City Council Review Date: September 22, 2025 SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The Applicant is requesting site plan approval for a 42-bed memory care project. LOCATION: 1620 Arboretum Blvd PID: 250101105 APPLICANT: Fusion - AE PROPERTY OWNER: Lighthouse Homes, LLC PRESENT ZONING: R-16 2040 LAND USE PLAN: High Density Residential SITE PLAN ACREAGE: 3.5 gross acres, 3.14 net acres SITE PLAN DENSITY: 13.38 Units/Acre PROPOSED MOTION: “The Chanhassen City Council approves the requested site plan for the 42-bed Eden Springs Assisted Living & Memory Care facility subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision.” 596 Page 2 of 15 LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city’s discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with zoning ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the city must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Notice of the public hearing at the Planning Commission was mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article XV, Division 2 “R-16” District Chapter 20, Article 20-XXIII, Division 20-XXIII-9 Design Standards for Multifamily Developments Chapter 20, Article 20-VI, Wetland Management District Chapter 20, Article 20-VII, Shoreland Management District PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The Applicant is proposing the construction of a 42-bed memory care building. The request consists of a site plan approval to facilitate the construction of a continuing care retirement facility (Eden Springs). The site is located north of West 78th Street and west of Lake Ann Park. Access to the site is proposed from West 78th Street. The site is zoned R-16 District. The site plan proposes to construct a 59,130-square-foot memory care facility. This is considered a “continuing care facility” by city code. The total permitted site coverage is 50 percent, and the proposed development has a total hard coverage area of 38.1%. The site contains multiple wetlands, a creek and is within the shoreland overlay district. The Applicant requested a five-foot wetland setback variance and a front yard setback variance. The requested variances were approved by the Planning Commission at their September 2 meeting. Staff is recommending approval of the site plan with conditions as outlined in the staff report. The city has previously received, reviewed, and approved an application for this site which allowed for the construction of 48-unit memory care facility. That project was never built, and those approvals have since lapsed. The prior project also requested the same variances, which were approved as recommended by staff. SITE PLAN REVIEW 597 Page 3 of 15 This building must comply with the Design Standards for the multi-family district and the standards required by city code for a continuing care retirement facility. City Code requires development to have an attractive design and use durable materials. The building has a pronounced entrance, utilizes durable exterior materials, and exhibits articulation. The north and south elevations contain patio areas. The roofline is staggered, well-articulated, and enhances the design of the building. The building materials include lap siding for the main body of the building and cedar shakes and stone accent materials. All elevations have received equal attention. Parking is buffered from views by landscaping. The trash enclosures for the building are also screened from public view. Site coverage may not exceed 50 percent. The total hard surface coverage proposed on the site is 38.1%. The applicant requested two variances pertaining to setbacks. The first variance is a parking setback variance. The City Code requires a minimum 25-foot setback. The applicant is requesting to reduce the setback to 10 feet. The site contains wetlands on the northern portion of the property, restricting the ability to shift the proposed development further north to adhere to the standard minimum front yard parking setback. The proposed use of the property is reasonable however the wetlands and their buffering create a difficulty in the reasonable use of the property and adhering to the typical front yard parking setback on the south side while also meeting wetland protection and buffering requirements on the north side. The impact of the parking and its proximity to the public right of way is adequately addressed through landscape screening. The requested variance was approved by the Planning Commission at their September 2 meeting as recommended by staff. The applicant is also requesting wetland setback variance reducing the required wetland setback to five feet. In return, the applicant is providing a wider buffer in other areas around the wetlands. The requested variance was approved by the Planning Commission at their September 2 meeting as recommended by staff. Per City Code Section 20-965, Continuing care retirement facility, the following applies to continuing care retirement facilities: 1. The facility shall maintain state licensing. 2. The facility shall conform to the requirements of the Minnesota State Building Codes and Fire Codes. 3. The facility shall be connected to municipal services. 4. The facility shall be of residential style and character with a maximum structure height of 35 feet. 5. Parking areas shall be screened from public or private right-of-way and adjacent single- family residential areas. 6. One-third parking space per bed shall be provided with an additional parking space for every employee on the largest single shift. 598 Page 4 of 15 7. The facility shall be located in a medium or high-density district with a gross density not exceeding 16 beds per acre. 8. Access to the site shall be from a collector or arterial street as defined in the comprehensive plan. COMPLIANCE TABLE *In compliance based on an approved reduced parking setback. ** In compliance based on an approved reduced wetland setback variance. Parking City code section 20-965 establishes that the minimum number of parking spaces required to be provided for continuing care retirement facilities is one-third parking space per bed with an additional parking space for every employee on the largest shift . The project shows a total of 42 beds which requires 14 parking spaces in addition to the 10 spaces required for the largest employee shift. Based on the project as proposed, a minimum of 24 parking spaces are required, with no requirement for covered parking. Ordinance Requirements Subject Site Lot Area 129,600 square feet 155,251 square feet Lot Coverage 50% 38.1% Building Height Principal 35’ 35’ Building Setbacks Front yard 50’ 51.7’ Rear yard 50’ + wetland setback of 30’ 95.3’ + 5’** Side yard 50’ 79.8’ /133.9’ Parking Setback All Yards 25’ 25 sides and 10’ Front* Parking Requirements Stalls ⅓ space per bed + 1 space per employee on major shift which translates to 14 + 10 = 24 30 spaces (2 of which are garage stalls) 599 Page 5 of 15 The project proposes a total of 30 parking spaces. There are proposed to be two garage parking stalls and 28 surface parking stalls. Loading, mechanical, and refuse areas Garbage & recycling services shall be located behind screening walls and gates. Most mechanical equipment will be internal to the building and will therefore not require any additional screening. Some mechanical equipment is planned to be located at grade, between the building wings, north of the connecting hallway, and at the south corners of the building. Plans show these mechanical units being screened by landscaping or out of public view. Lighting City code requires that light fixture height shall not exceed 30 feet. Fixtures are shown at a height of 25 feet which adheres to City Code. Lighting on the building faces shall also be restricted to having a total cutoff angle equal to or less than 90 degrees. City code requires that light levels measured at the property lines in multi-family zoning districts shall not exceed one-half-foot candle. The provided photometric plan dated 8/13/25 shows that the light level at the property line does not exceed 0.2 foot candle at the property lines. Signage Plans provided do not depict final signage plan for the site. Signage for the property shall comply with City Code Section 20-1301 and all other applicable regulations to the site. Sign permits shall be applied for and approved at the time of building permit. Landscaping and Tree Preservation The applicant has submitted a plan which includes the removal of some trees as well as buckthorn and other invasive species within the wetland buffer. Sheet C1.0 Removals Plan indicates which trees have been inventoried and what trees are proposed to be removed. The Applicant shall add a table listing each of the inventoried trees on the property. That inventory shall include the tree species, DBH measurement, and current condition listed as either poor, fair, or good. While the project does not include a subdivision, City Code section 18-61 indicates that tree preservation requirements apply to subdivision evaluations as well as site plans. Applicant to provide an analysis for baseline canopy coverage and minimum canopy coverage requirements. A planting plan was provided for all required plantings. The quantity of plantings in all buffer yards and parking lot landscaping areas meets or exceeds the City Code requirements. The current planting plan does not meet planting diversity requirements. Prior to final approval, the plan must be updated so that no more than 10% of the planting is the same species; no more than 20% of the same genus; and no more than 40% from the same family. 600 Page 6 of 15 BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Required architectural standards The proposed development site is in the R-16 zoning district, so the building must meet the design standards for multifamily developments established in City Code Division 20-XXIII-9. Massing and Placement The maximum building height permitted is three stories. The building meets the ordinance requirement. The roofline is staggered, adding articulation to the design of the buildings. The ordinance requires a pitched element on building. Multiple pitched elements are used to break the expanse of the pitched roof to comply with this requirement. Elevations 601 Page 7 of 15 Renderings Materials and Color A variety of materials are proposed for the building, including shake siding, wood lap siding, manufactured stone masonry, and architectural metal roofing. The accent materials exceed the 20% required by code, with 22% of all wall surfaces using cedar shake siding and 10% using a manufactured stone accent material for a total of 32% accent materials used. The colors proposed are neutral including white, gray, black, and tan. It appears that the variation of color complies with the architectural requirements. ACCESS The development fronts on W 78th Street near the intersection of Audubon Road and TH 5 and proposes an access driveway on the far west side of the site that is a full access, and another access on the east side of the site which is restricted as a right-in and right-out. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) was provided with plans for review due to the proximity of Trunk Highway 5 and had comments regarding water resources and noise. A MnDOT drainage permit may be required before development occurs. The applicant must assess the existing noise from the highway and meet any requirements established by the Department of Transportation to minimize the impact on the proposed development. SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN Water service is available off W 78th Street via a 12-inch DIP watermain. The applicant has revised their proposal to show one wet tap on the west side of the property, with the waterline looping within the site. 602 Page 8 of 15 The City’s sanitary sewer network is not available near the subject property, however the “Chanhassen Interceptor” sanitary main owned and operated by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) is directly adjacent to the property. The applicant has revised their proposal to show a gravity sanitary sewer connection to the existing interceptor manhole within the city right-of-way. GRADING & DRAINAGE The project site is located north of W 78th Street, west of Lake Ann Park Drive, and south of Lake Ann. It consists of a single parcel that is currently an open, grass-covered lot with woods and a wetland along its northern edge. Under existing conditions, most of the site drains north to Riley Creek, while a small portion within the right-of-way drains south to W 78th Street. Under the proposed conditions, the site will be mass graded to accommodate a senior assisted living facility with an impervious footprint of approximately 58,000 square feet. Stormwater runoff from the facility will be directed to a water reuse basin and a filtration basin. A small portion of the site within the right-of-way will continue draining to W 78th Street, while the remainder will flow north to Riley Creek. Due to site constraints, the applicant proposes grading up to the minimum wetland buffer. EROSION CONTROL The proposed development will impact one (1) acre of disturbance and will, therefore, be subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disp osal System (NPDES Construction Permit). The applicant has submitted an erosion control plan and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), however revisions and updates to the plans and SWPPP are required to meet the requirements of the NPDES Construction Permit and Sec. 19- 145 of City Code. The location of stockpiles for grading and for topsoil must be noted. The SWPPP will need to be updated as the plans are finalized when the contractor and their sub- contractors are identified and as other conditions change. An approved SWPPP shall be submitted prior to recording the final site plan agreement. All erosion control shall be installed and inspected prior to initiation of site grading activities. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DISTRICTS • Wetland Protection – Must follow wetland protection guidelines due to the proximity to Riley Creek. • Shoreland Management – Is in the shoreland management area for Riley Creek. • Floodplain Overlay – Is minimally impacted by the FEMA AE Flood Zone from 2018. WETLANDS A Notice of Decision of the wetland boundary and type was approved on 5/29/2025. The wetland delineation indicates the wetland is 0.08 acres of a Type 1/2, located adjacent to Riley Creek. While there is no direct impact to the wetlands on -site, the applicant is proposing to 603 Page 9 of 15 encroach into the proposed wetland buffer during construction activities. Additionally, the applicant is requesting wetland buffer averaging and a reduction in wetland buffer setbacks due to site conditions and constraints, such as dynamic topography, wetl and location in relation to site boundaries, and adjacent street frontage treatments. While staff generally agree that the site has inherent constraints due to the location of the wetland and the proposed structure and property lines, the applicant’s proposal is to have a minimum buffering average width of twenty (20) feet coupled with a five (5) foot setback as illustrated below. The proposed plans show a minimum buffer associated with a manage 2 wetland classification but show the building and sidewalks well within the 30-foot setback measured from the buffer edge which required a variance to city code. Building setbacks act to help preserve the wetland buffers and downstream water resources. To offset the adverse impacts anticipated from the close proximity of the building and walkways an enhanced buffer establishment plan is recommended by staff. During the TEP’s site review staff observed that the proposed buffer areas for both the wetland and Riley Creek were degraded and filled with debris and invasive species including buckthorn. As such, the Water Resources Department recommends that the debris and invasive species are removed, and a native vegetation is established to protect the 604 Page 10 of 15 wetland and creek. As such the applicant shall work with staff to update and enhance the buffer establishment plan. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT Article VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required storm water management development standards. Section 19-141 states that “these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features.” These standards include abstraction of runoff and water quality treatment resulting in the removal of 90% total suspended solids (TSS) and 60% total phosphorous (TP). The proposed project is in the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District and therefore subject to the watershed’s rules and regulations. A Stormwater Management Report was submitted for review to confirm all applicable stormwater management requirements are being met. This includes rate control, volume abstraction and water quality requirements among others. All comments on the proposed design from both the city and RPBCWD will need to be addressed. The applicant shall p rovide final versions of all modeling (HydroCAD and MIDS) and Stormwater Management Report to address remaining comments and confirm rate, volume and water quality requirements are met as part of the final site plan submittal. Additionally, conditional approval from the watershed district shall be provided with the final site plan submittal to confirm the design is meeting all applicable stormwater management requirements. The applicant proposes to meet stormwater management requirements through an irrigation system, a biofiltration basin, and a Jellyfish Filter. Runoff will be routed first to the irrigation system, then to the Jellyfish Filter, and finally to the biofiltrat ion basin. The applicant must provide documentation to verify the pollutant removal rates assumed for the Jellyfish Filter. On-site infiltration is not feasible due to “Type D” soils, which are slow -draining and typically have an infiltration rate of about 0.06 in/hr. Site-specific testing confirmed an infiltration rate of 0.0 in/hr, limiting infiltration opportunities. As a result, the site qualifies as “restricted” under RPBCWD rules, reducing the required abstraction from 1.1 inches to 0.55 inches. The applicant modeled abstraction through the irrigation system and biofiltration basin in MIDS, which indicates compliance with the 0.55-inch requirement. The applicant must confirm the proposed irrigation area with a supporting figure. Freeboard requirements are met for the stormwater basins, with at least 1.0 foot of freeboard to be provided at site low points. An operation and maintenance (O&M) plan is required for all private stormwater BMPs. The O&M obligations apply in perpetuity and must be approved by the Water Resources Engineer (or designee) and recorded against the benefiting properties. The site is located within both the FEMA and RPBCWD floodplains. If grading alters floodplain elevations, the applicant must demonstrate compliance with all applicable floodplain regulations, including compensatory storage. SITE PLAN FINDINGS 605 Page 11 of 15 In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: 1. Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the Comprehensive Plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; 2. Consistency with this division; 3. Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; 4. Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; 5. Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. 6. Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the city's design requirements, the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning ordinance due to the setback variance approvals, the design standards, and the site plan review requirements. Staff is recommending approval of the request with conditions. The site design is compatible with the surrounding developments. It is functional and harmonious with the area. 606 Page 12 of 15 The project is a reasonable use of the land. The overall design is sensitive to the city’s image. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan with conditions outlined in the staff report. VARIANCE REQUEST #1 The first variance request is for a reduction in the wetland setback requirements. The site contains multiple wetlands, and Riley Creek is located along the northern edge of the site. A reasonable solution supported by City Code is to average the buffer around the wetlands and reduce the setback in return. Staff is recommending approval of the wetland setback variance. VARIANCE REQUEST #2 The second variance request is for a reduced parking setback. The standard parking setback required by ordinance is 25 feet. The intent of the setback is so that the parking lot can be adequately screened from adjacent properties and public right of way. The applicant is providing adequate screening that will accomplish the intent of the ordinance. Additionally, the north side of the property contains a large wetland complex and associated protections, setbacks, and buffering of those wetlands, which creates a practical difficulty unique to the property that does not make it feasible to shift the proposed building and associated improvements to comply with the typical parking setback requirement. Staff is recommending approval of the parking setback variance. The Planning Commission approved the requested variances as recommended by staff. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the requested site plan for the construction of the project as proposed subject to updating of plans based on staff review comments. APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTS PLANNING: 1. Approval of the site plan applications is contingent upon approval of the variances. Resolved. 2. Applicant shall enter into a Site Plan Agreement. The Site Plan Agreement shall be recorded against the Subject Property. FORESTRY: 1. Provide a complete inventory of all trees being removed. Provide the species by name – in some cases, the words cottonwood, ash, or willow are specific enough. Be specific on the type of elm, locust, maple, spruce, pine, etc. That inventory shall include the tree species, DBH measurement, and current condition listed as either poor, fair, or good. 2. Submittal of an acceptable planting plan that complies with diversity requirements. City code requires species diversity such that no more than 10% of the planting is the same 607 Page 13 of 15 species; no more than 20% of the same genus; and no more than 40% from the same family 3. Provide more detail on the location of tree protection fencing, the type of fence being used, and the species being protected. 4. Project to conform with City Code Section 20-1179 to ensure the minimum landscape value meets the required percentage of the overall project value. 5. Applicant to provide baseline canopy coverage and minimum canopy coverage analysis as outlined by City Code section 18-61. ENGINEERING: 1. The developer shall enter into Encroachment Agreements for private improvements (e.g., retaining walls and monument signage) located within the 10-foot-wide public drainage and utility corridor abutting 78th Street right -of-way prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Any previously recorded easements located within proposed public right -of-way or proposed public drainage and utility easements must be vacated prior to or concurrently with approval of final construction plans. 3. The applicant and their Engineer shall work with City staff in amending the construction plans, dated August 13th, 2025, prepared by Anders Melby with Civil Site Group, to fully satisfy construction plan comments and concerns. Final construction plans will be subject to review and approval by staff prior to the recording of the site plan agreement. 4. All newly constructed streets and sidewalks will be privately owned and maintained. The developer shall provide for review and approval maintenance agreements for these improvements. 5. Construction design elements associated with the street plans such as stationing, curb tables and alignments, centerline grades, and intersection details will be required prior to recording of the site plan agreement. 6. All sanitary sewer mains shall be privately owned and maintained and their connection to the MCES interceptor be permitted through MCES. Approval to connect directly to the MCES interceptor shall be provided to the City prior to recording of the Site Plan Agreement. The applicant will be required to enter into a maintenance agreement with the city for the proposed inside drop within MCES manhole prior to issuance of building permits. 7. City owned utilities shall be covered by a Drainage and Utility Easement which shall be large enough for the owner to own and maintain. 8. The applicant will be required to enter into a Site Plan Agreement with the City and all applicable securities and fees provided prior to the recording of the site plan agreement. 9. It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project (i.e. MCES, Army Corps of Engineers, DNR, MnDOT, Carver County, RPBC Watershed District, Board of Water and Soil Resources, PCA, MDH, MPCA, etc.). Once permits are received, applicant shall provide copies to the City’s engineering office prior to start of construction. 608 Page 14 of 15 10. The developer shall incorporate the latest City Detail Plates and Specifications into the final construction plan submission. Comment resolved. 11. Sidewalks must be a minimum of 5 feet wide, and City trails must match existing width. Comment updated and met. 12. City Standard Detail Plates shall be included in the construction plan set and displayed in a layout format of 2 rows by 4 columns for consistency with City expectations. Comment resolved. 13. Retaining walls shall be privately owned and maintained. Walls four feet in height and greater shall be designed by an engineer. 14. Removal plans shall be updated to include the impacts into W 78th St in order to construct access off the street. Resolved. 15. Applicant shall construct a right-in/right-out at their eastern entrance, including medians, and install applicable signage within W 78th St median. Resolved. 16. The applicant shall loop the watermain within the site, and is only approved to complete one wet-tap on the existing city owned watermain. Resolved. 17. Provide a traffic control plan to construct the connections to 78th Street and the connection to the existing watermain. 18. Final construction plans shall include a color-coded map identifying publicly owned improvements vs privately owned. 19. Sewer service should be directional drilled across W 78th St. Condition added. 20. Provide agreement with MCES to connect into manhole. Condition added. 21. For connection to W 78th St, provide a straight cut across the entire road width. Condition added. WATER RESOURCES: 1. The applicant shall submit documentation demonstrating the removal percentage for the Jellyfish Filter with the final plan submittal. 2. The applicant shall provide an operation and maintenance plan (O&M) for the private stormwater BMPs onsite. The O&M of private stormwater BMPs is required in perpetuity and must be approved by the Water Resources Engineer, or their designee, to be recorded against the benefiting properties, prior to building permits being issued. The O&M agreement shall outline the areas to be irrigated with the reuse system. 3. The applicant shall provide 1.0’ of separation from the emergency overflow routes to the low floor elevation with the final plan submittal. 4. The applicant shall submit storm sewer sizing calculations and catch basin drainage area map with the final plan submittal. 5. The applicant shall secure conditional approval from the watershed district prior to submitting the final plans application to the City. 6. It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project (i.e. MnDNR, Carver County, RPBCWD, Board of Water and Soil Resources, MnDOT, DNR, etc.) prior to the commencement of construction activities. 609 Page 15 of 15 7. The applicant shall confirm in the stormwater management report if there are any FEMA/RPBCWD floodplain impacts or not and update the design and plan to meet all applicable rules. 8. The applicant shall work with staff to update and enhance the buffer establishment plan. An approved buffer enhancement plan shall be required before recording the site plan agreement. BUILDING: 1. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 2. Building plans must be submitted to the Department of Labor and Industry (DOLI) for plan review. 3. After DOLI has completed their plan review a building permit must be obtained from the City of Chanhassen before beginning any construction. 4. The building is required to have automatic fire extinguishing systems. 5. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high, measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. Retaining walls (if present) under four feet in height require a zoning permit. PARKS: 1. A pedestrian connection from the internal site to the trail network on West 78 th Street is required. Comment resolved. FIRE: 1. Due to driveway and parking lot width, No Parking Fire Lane signs will be required throughout. No parking allowed on curbs or anywhere outside of parking spaces. Comment resolved. 2. Will require a full fire alarm with notification system. 3. All egress doors and gates require a hard surface path to the public right of way. Comment resolved. 4. Hydrants required within 100 feet of both FDC locations as well as center of building. Comment updated. 610 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION IN RE: Application of Fusion - AE – Planning Case No. 2025-10, Eden Springs, for Site Plan Review. On September 2, 2025, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Fusion – AE for a Memory Care Facility. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed development, preceded by a published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and approved the requested variances and recommended approval of the requested site plan review based upon the city ordinances in effect at the time. On September 22, 2025, the Chanhassen City Council met at its scheduled meeting to consider the application referenced above and based upon the ordinances currently in place the City Council makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned R-16 District. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential – High Density. 3. The legal description of the property is described in the attached Exhibit A. SITE PLAN REVIEW FINDINGS 1. The Applicant has requested approval of the site plan dated September 9, 2025, prepared by Anders S. Melby. 2. The zoning ordinance directs the City to consider nine possible adverse effects of the proposed site plan. The nine effects and our findings regarding them are: a) Is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted. b) Is consistent with the site plan review requirements. c) Preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas. 611 2 d) Creation of a harmonious relationship of buildings and open spaces with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development. e) Creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: i. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; ii. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; iii. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and iv. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. f) Protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. g) Within the Highway Corridor (HC) districts, consistency with the purpose, intent and standards of the HC districts. h) Within the Bluff Creek Overlay (BCO) district, consistency with the purpose, intent and standards of the BCO district. i) Maintain an acceptable road system level of service. Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the city's design requirements, the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning ordinance, the design standards, and the site plan review requirements. Staff is recommending approval of the request with conditions. The site design is compatible with the surrounding developments. It is functional and harmonious with the area. Approval of this site plan is contingent upon the conditions listed in the staff report #25-10 dated September 16, 2025, prepared by Rachel Jeske et al. 3. The planning report #2025-10 dated September 16, 2025, prepared by Rachel Jeske et al, is incorporated herein. 612 3 DECISION The City Council approves the proposed site plan based on the findings of fact included herein, and subject to the conditions of the staff report. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 22nd day of September, 2025. CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL BY:___________________________________ Its Mayor BY:___________________________________ Its City Manager 613 4 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED That part of Tracts A and B below: Tract A: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the south line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, distance 195.0 feet west of the southeast corner thereof; thence west along said south line a distance of 361.00 feet; thence northerly parallel to the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 593.20 feet; thence deflecting right at an angle of 62 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 150 feet, more or less, to the center line of creek; thence easterly along said centerline to its intersection with a line drawn northerly and parallel with said east line from point of beginning; thence southerly along said parallel line to the point of beginning. Tract B: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the south line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, distance 195.0 feet west of the southeast corner thereof; thence northerly parallel with the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter to its intersection with the centerline of the creek; thence easterly along said centerline of the creek to its intersection with the east line said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence southerly along said east line to the southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence west along said south line to the point of beginning; which lies northerly of the northerly boundary of Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat Numbered 10-09 as the same is on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for said county. 614 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 2, 2025 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Noyes called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Eric Noyes, Steve Jobe, Jeremy Rosengren, Ryan Soller, Mike Olmstead, Dave Grover, and Katie Trevena. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Rachel Arsenault, Associate Planner; Eric Maass, Community Development Director; Rachel Jeske, Planner; and Joe Seidl, Water Resource Engineer. PUBLIC PRESENT: Deena Laugen Pioneer Trail Joy Gora Chanhassen, MN Linda Boerboom 2020 Clover Court Eric Reiners Eden Prairie, MN Logan Stein Plymouth, MN Andrew Altstatt Lakeville, MN C Henson Prior Lake, MN Scot Lacek Chanhassen, MN PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. CONSIDER A VARIANCE FOR A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 3630 HICKORY ROAD (PLANNING CASE #25-13) Rachel Arsenault, Associate Planner, reviewed Planning Case #2025-13 for rebuilding a garage at 3630 Hickory Road. She stated that the location was in the Red Cedar Point Neighborhood and was zoned residential single-family with a low-density residential land use. She noted specific lot attributes, including that it was 0.24 acres, 40 feet wide, bisected by Hickory Road, and was platted in 1913. She noted that the lot size is smaller than what is required by today’s standards. She explained the layout of the proposed garage, which would take the place of the existing garage. The expansion portion beyond what currently exists results in a variance that needs to be approved in order for the garage to be constructed as proposed. She said that the side setbacks were the same as the current setbacks. She reviewed the variance criteria and stated that the proposed garage met the criteria. Commissioner Jobe asked about the ten-foot drop on the topographical and if there would be any special landscaping built into the plan. Mrs. Arsenault answered that topographical changes 615 Planning Commission Minutes – September 2, 2025 2 would be addressed in the building plans, but any structures with the variance would have to meet the setbacks proposed in this variance plan. Chairman Noyes said that the owner is doing what they can reasonably do with the property, so the proposal seems the best way to go about it. Chairman Noyes opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. Chairman Noyes closed the public hearing. Commissioner Jobe moved, Commissioner Rosengren seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves the requested decreased side yard setbacks, subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. 2. CONSIDER A SITE PLAN AND VARIANCE FOR A MEMORY CARE FACILITY AT 1620 ARBORETUM BLV (#25-10) Rachel Jeske, Planner, stated that Planning Case #2025-10 would go before the Planning Commission tonight and the City Council on September 22. She stated that the proposed development location is zoned high-density residential now and in the 2040 Land Use Guidance. She stated that the Moments of Chanhassen project was approved in January 2020, and the Eden Springs proposal was applied for in August 2025. She reviewed the proposed communications, including the proposed development sign placed on the property, an email sent on various dates to the proposed development's email group, postcards sent to neighbors within 500 feet, and a public hearing notice posted in the Sun Sailor. Ms. Jeske summarized the level of city discretion in approving or denying a site plan and noted that it was a quasi-judicial decision. She reviewed the definition of a continuing care facility and the standards required by the city. She noted the proposed architecture and the landscaping and stated that the planting plan did not meet the planting diversity requirements and would need to be updated before final construction plan approval. She commented that the proposed lighting plan meets the standards, and the proposed light pole height was less than 35 feet. She commented that the project requested a variance for the front yard parking setback and the wetland setback. She stated that the applicant proposed 30 parking spaces, including two garage stalls. She reviewed the variance standards and provided additional details about the variance requests. She noted that Riley Creek was located along the northern edge of the site, and that a reasonable solution was to average the buffer around the wetlands and reduce the setback in return. The second variance request was the reduced parking setback, and the applicant noted that they would provide adequate screening to accomplish the intent of the ordinance, but the wetland made it difficult to meet the 25-foot setback in the front of the property. She provided an overview of the utilities and stated that sanitary and water main services were located adjacent to the site. She commented that staff would require the water main to be looped within the site 616 Planning Commission Minutes – September 2, 2025 3 rather than accessing it in two separate locations. She stated the project would be required to connect to the sewer line in the adjacent city right-of-way if an easement is not acquired. Joe Seidl, Water Resources Engineer, stated that the site is currently undeveloped and is similar to an open prairie with a wooded area. He stated that a majority of the site runoff went directly into Riley Creek, and some of the runoff on the southern end of the project made its way to West 78th Street. He stated that there was one jurisdictional wetland onsite near the center of the site, which made development difficult. He stated that it was a managed type two and that the wetland and creek buffer was in poor condition because of debris and buckthorn. He stated that the project would maintain the major flow patterns and that there would be 58,000 square feet of new impervious area. He stated that the project would meet stormwater requirements for abstraction, rate control, and water quality by means of the filtration system and the jellyfish filter system. He commented that a wetland delineation was approved in May 2025, which found that there were 0.08 acres of a type 1/2 wetland adjacent and upgradient to Riley Creek. He stated that due to the site constraints, the applicant proposed placing the building within the wetland building setback. He stated that the proposed plans show a minimum buffer associated with a managed two-wetland classification, and the building and sidewalks were well within the 30-foot setback measured from the buffer edge, which requires a variance. He stated that the wetland delineators go out and determine the wetland line, and the Technical Evaluation Panel reviews the information. He said that the Water Resource department recommends an enhanced buffer reestablishment plan, which meets City Code 20-412, and the plan does have notes to the effect within the plan set. Ms. Jeske said that the site plan meets all the requirements for the site plan review. Commissioner Rosengren asked them to indicate where the back edge of the building would be. Mr. Seidl explained that the back end of the building would sit near a specific contour. Commissioner Jobe asked about City Code and water, and if they would use a retention pond for stormwater management, and if they would require or allow any fencing. He specifically referred to an individual with dementia entering the pond. Mr. Seidl said that it was a filtration basin; it should be dry most of the time, but a fence or other landscaping could be allowed by City Code. Commissioner Soller asked if there were additional requirements that the site would have to meet for the watershed district. Mr. Seidl responded that the site received conditional approval from the watershed district. He said that the watershed district had similar buffer requirements but allowed more averaging. He stated that the watershed district did not have any setback requirements, but the city does, which requires a variance. Commissioner Soller asked if averaging was spelled out in City Code to understand what was allowable, or if it was just best practice. Mr. Seidl answered that it was left to staff discretion, but the watershed district had a stricter methodology for the minimum buffer widths. Commissioner Soller asked if, given the trade-off in exchange for the variance, the city would receive a net benefit with the increased quality of the creek and buffer. Mr. Seidl confirmed this information. He said that they manage the impervious area, so they would balance the building 617 Planning Commission Minutes – September 2, 2025 4 being close to the wetland and the creek by buffering around the wetland. He said that there were areas outside of the wetland buffer, and they would look to them to establish native vegetation. Chairman Noyes asked about removing the buckthorn and construction debris, if there were any long-term maintenance requirements, and how they would be included. Mr. Seidl said it was discussed and outlined in the City Code. He requires that the applicants follow the MnDOT seeding manual, which provides a maintenance plan of three years for planting, prepping, mowing, and weeding until the establishment is complete. He stated it would be up to the owner of the site to maintain the area to meet the standards of the City Code. He said if the commissioners desired more from the applicant to ensure that it was taken care of, it could be added to the maintenance plan. Commissioner Olmstead asked how access management is regulated by the city. Ms. Jeske answered that the city engineer and the subdivision ordinance provides guidance on access management. Commissioner Olmstead asked who made the final decisions. He voiced concerns about two access points on a 40-mile-per-hour road, but it is coming from a controlled intersection with an all-way stop, and MnDOT did not express concerns about the plan. He said he was excited about access management, but he was not excited about the access point one hundred feet from a controlled intersection. Ms. Jeske said that the City Engineer determines the final plan. Commissioner Trevena said that they discussed the conditions outlined in the staff report that they want to be a part of the variance, and when they would see the conditions. She asked about the enhanced buffer and the developer’s responsibility. Ms. Jeske said that by approving the variance with the staff’s proposed conditions, they would apply to the variance approval. Commissioner Rosengren noted that this was reviewed and accepted by the city, but if they discovered anything, they are doing better this time around with the requirements and site review, even though the proposal was similar. Ms. Jeske responded that the variance proposals and the way the staff reviewed them were similar, but the staff previously recommended a five- foot wetland setback, when zero was originally proposed, which the new applicant included with their request. Deena Laugen, the applicant, stated that Eden Springs had a purpose to create a small home-like community in a luxury boutique setting. She stated that many people were hesitant when taking the first step to assisted living or memory care. She said it would be a place people can spend time together, building relationships and a community, and they can tailor the care to the individual. She stated that they would feel like it is the resident’s home, and they just work there. She reviewed the two current types assisted living homes in the market, like large apartments and retrofitted homes. She said that Eden Springs would be a different option and would fit the needed middle. She stated that loneliness was present in the elderly population, and individuals would not be isolated in their rooms. She commented that they were designed to spend the day interacting with everybody. She said that they would have a more favorable resident and 618 Planning Commission Minutes – September 2, 2025 5 caregiver ratio. She expressed excitement in bringing Eden Springs to Chanhassen to allow residents to experience a city for life. Chairman Noyes opened the public hearing. Joy Gora welcomed Deena Laugen to the industry. She wished her the best of luck and noted that there were a lot of rules and requirements. She stated that their industry always had staff shortages. She said that there are 1,900 assisted living homes in Minnesota. She said that people would need to tour multiple places to see the differences. She commented that there are tremendously great individuals in the industry. She said that she would face challenges in Chanhassen. She encouraged that the staff ratio was a quality ratio, so she did not look like a predator in the industry. She thought the location would be a wonderful place to have a dementia unit. She stated that if a dementia client slipped out of the facility, they would likely have a wander guard on the patient. She commented that if they left the facility, they hoped they would receive support from the sheriff’s department to locate the client. Linda Boerboom, 2020 Clover Court, stated that she traveled the frontage road every day. She expressed concerns about dementia with the street out there and if there would be any safeguards put in place to protect the drivers on the road and the residents. She asked if they would need gates or to reduce speed in that area. She expressed concern because they have winters in Minnesota, so there could be ice. She commented that the plot of land was very small. She said she wanted to look at safety. Deena Laugen mentioned on the site plan in the back, there would be gates with locks, along with locks on any exterior door. She stated that there was constant improvement with AI to keep residents safe while maintaining their rights. Chairman Noyes closed the public hearing. Commissioner Olmstead stated as they saw additional development and traffic demand on the roadways, they had an approach to assess the traffic and roadways. He asked about traffic control, such as four-way stops. Ms. Jeske said that all accesses are considered by the engineering team during a development proposal. She said a resident could submit concerns to the traffic safety committee about specific intersections. She stated that there were city-wide initiatives, such as speed limits. She said it was determined on a case-by-case basis. Mr. Seidl commented that there were engineering standards for sightlines and intersections for safe travel on roadways. He said there was traffic counting to see if a roadway could handle the amount of traffic proposed. He stated that the engineering department is looking at these with each development. He commented that they are looking at these things to make sure they do not impede traffic and that residents stay safe. Commissioner Soller stated that as development happens, roadways will get busier. He commented that certain areas of the city meet engineering standards, but not the expectations of residents who want to live in a safe and quiet neighborhood. He wants to understand the process. 619 Planning Commission Minutes – September 2, 2025 6 Commissioner Grover said that there was a large area that was farmland west of the property. He asked about what uses were allowed for the area and if this was compatible with other developments that might occur. Ms. Jeske said that the 2040 comprehensive plan was guided for residential and housing, but it would be dependent on the landowner. She said that the guidance could change in the future. Chairman Noyes commented that they received three emailed public comments about the case. He summarized the first, which thought that the development was too close to Lake Ann Park, another that said the cost of memory care was too high, and the third wanted a golf course. He stated that the Planning Commission had to make sure the site plan and variances met the requirements of the city code. He commented that they were not here to make a judgment on the good or bad of the proposal. Commissioner Soller stated that any project that would have a traffic impact or impact on pedestrians, he asked if they could highlight whether this project would provide a net or neutral benefit to pedestrian access along the road. Ms. Jeske responded that the additions would be two driveways and additional landscaping. She said it was a net neutral benefit to pedestrians. Commissioner Soller clarified that both access points would have a pedestrian crosswalk through the access point. Ms. Jeske confirmed they will likely have crosswalks across them. Commissioner Soller asked if this was a requirement in the City Code. Ms. Jeske answered that it was up to the discretion of the engineering department. Commissioner Rosengren said a similar plan was previously approved. Chairman Noyes asked if they needed to have a written-out condition related to the landscaping maintenance plan. Ms. Jeske answered that the water resources department did a good job with their plans but asked for feedback from Mr. Seidl. Mr. Seidl answered that the watershed district required a buffer management plan, so he thought they would be covered. He did not see an issue with the applicant since they have to work with the watershed district. Commissioner Olmstead moved, Commissioner Rosengren seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission approve the requested variances and recommended approval of the requested site plan for the 42-bed Eden Springs Assisted Living & Memory Care facility, subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0, with Commissioner Jobe abstaining from this item. GENERAL BUSINESS: 1. EXTENSION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) PREVIOUSLY ISSUED FOR A CONTRACTOR’S YARD AT 1591 PARK ROAD 620 Planning Commission Minutes – September 2, 2025 7 Rachel Arsenault, Associate Planner, reviewed Planning Case #2024-09, which is requesting an extension to the conditional use permit for a contractor’s yard at 1591 Park Road. She stated that the new owner purchased the property in the winter and was working through the stormwater management plan to move on to the permit to install stormwater management, gutters, and paving. She stated that the lapse condition was nearing for the conditional use permit and that the staff recommends a one-year extension to the conditional use permit. Commissioner Jobe moved, Commissioner Trevena seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council grant the proposed conditional use permit extension for the contracting yard at 1591 Park Road. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED AUGUST 12, 2025 Commissioner Soller moved, and Commissioner Grover seconded to approve the Chanhassen Planning Commission summary minutes dated August 12, 2025, as presented. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS: None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS: Eric Maass, Community Development Director, stated that the city remains on schedule to move into the new City Hall building, so the September 16 meeting will likely be held in the new City Hall. Chairman Noyes asked about a picture of the Planning Commission in the new meeting. Mr. Maass asked if all were available, and if not, they would target the first meeting in October for a photograph. Commissioner Jobe asked when the city approves a site plan with tree covers and a mature tree was damaged and was likely to die, what would happen. Mr. Maass responded that they require a grading fence and a tree save fence to protect the root area of the tree from grading activities. He said that if grading activities occur outside of where it was supposed to be or the fencing is not installed and trees that were required to be saved are removed, then the development contract stipulates penalties such as replanting at a two-to-one ratio. Commissioner Soller asked if there was an agenda for the September 16 meeting. Mr. Maass confirmed the information. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION: None. OPEN DISCUSSION: None. 621 Planning Commission Minutes – September 2, 2025 8 ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Jobe moved, Commissioner Trevena seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:10 p.m. Submitted by Eric Maass Community Development Director 622 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Approve Final Plat of Avienda Apartments (Planning Case 25-08) File No.Item No: H.2 Agenda Section GENERAL BUSINESS Prepared By Eric Maass, Community Development Director Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the final plat of Avienda Apartments and adopts the attached findings of fact and decision." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY The City Council is asked to approve the Final Plat for Avienda Apartments. The City Council approved the project's Preliminary Plat on June 23. Typically, a request for Development Contract approval is made at the same time as the request for final plat approval. However, the Avienda development is multifaceted, including residential and commercial components. In this instance, a grocery anchor desires to see the Avienda Apartments project formally purchase land within Avienda before the grocer commits to a location within Avienda. The city, in its desire to help facilitate commercial development within Avienda, is considering approval of the Final Plat before the Development Contract in order to facilitate the apartment project proceeding towards its closing date and preparation of associated documentation, including the final plat mylar. City staff anticipates requesting approval of a Development Contract for Avienda Apartments at the October 13 City Council meeting. 623 The proposed Final Plat approval includes a condition that the developer enter into a development contract with the city before recording an approved final plat. BACKGROUND The proposed final plat is consistent with the previously approved preliminary plat and adheres to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) lot standards outlined within the Avienda PUD. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Avienda Apartments final plat and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Decision. ATTACHMENTS Avienda Apartments Final Plat Avienda Apartments Final Plat Findings of Fact and Decision Staff Presentation - Avienda Apartments Final Plat 624 AVIENDA APARTMENTSKNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Level 7 Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following describedproperty situated in the County of Carver, State of Minnesota, to wit:Outlot B, AVIENDA ROWHOMES, Carver County, MinnesotaandThat part of AVIENDA PARKWAY, as dedicated in the plat of AVIENDA, Carver County, Minnesota as vacated as recorded in Doc ________________Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as AVIENDA APARTMENTS and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the easements fordrainage and utility purposes as shown on this plat.In witness whereof said Level 7 Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this_________ day of _______________________, 20____.LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT, LLC_____________________________________________PresidentSTATE OF MINNESOTACOUNTY OF ______________________The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of __________________________________, 20____ by___________________________________, the President of Level 7 Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company.(Sign)_____________________________________________(Print)_____________________________________________Notary Public, _________________ County, MinnesotaMy Commission Expires ________________________I Jerrod Gustavus LeSavage do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyorin the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designatedon this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as definedin Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown andlabeled on this plat.Dated this _________ day of ___________________, 20____._______________________________________________Jerrod Gustavus LeSavage, Licensed Land SurveyorMinnesota License Number 58896STATE OF MINNESOTACOUNTY OF ______________________The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _________ day of _________________________, 20____ by Jerrod Gustavus LeSavage.(Sign)_____________________________________________(Print)_____________________________________________Notary Public, _________________ County, MinnesotaMy Commission Expires _________________________CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTAThis plat of AVIENDA APARTMENTS was approved and accepted by the City Council of Chanhassen, Minnesota at a regular meetingthereof held on this ______ day of ____________________, 20____, and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of MinnesotaStatutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2.CITY COUNCIL OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTABy:____________________________________________ MayorBy:____________________________________________ ClerkCOUNTY SURVEYOR, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTAPursuant to Chapter 395, Minnesota Laws of 1971, this plat has been approved this ______ day of ___________________________,20____.Brian E. Praske, County SurveyorBy: ____________________________________________COUNTY AUDITOR, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTAI hereby certify that taxes payable in _____________ and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat.Dated this ______ day of _________________________, 20____.Crystal Campos, County AuditorBy: ____________________________________________COUNTY RECORDER, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTAI hereby certify that this plat of AVIENDA APARTMENTS was filed this ______ day of ____________________, 20____, at ______o'clock ___. M. as Document No. __________________________.Kaaren Lewis, County RecorderBy: ____________________________________________625 ΔΔΔΔΔΔΔ Δ ΔΔNot Tangent8680 Found IronBroken CapFound IronBroken CapFound IronBroken CapFound Iron1/2" open135 103 91 113SEE DETAIL AEast line of OUTLOT B, AVIENDA ROWHOMESPondPondEdge ofWaterEdge ofWaterWet LandWet LandΔΔΔΔ32.59 49.55107.34S82°25'47"ES00°21'54"W 836.89 S59° 24 '1 8 "W41.37300.31OUTLOT ABLOCK 1LOT 1Drainage and Utility Easement over all of OUTLOT A16.92C. BRG. S27°02'27"EL=12.50R=100.00Δ=7°09'41"N30°37'17"W 26.82N00°35'09"W 26.70N89°59'58"E 125.7927.32186.10S17°27'01"E32.51S72°32'54"W45.59S00°21'54"W18.29S89°38'06"E20.00S00°21'54"W18.29N89°38'06"WS00°21'54"W 412.59 18.29S89°38'06"E20.00S00°21'54"W18.29N89°38'06"W49.13S00°21'54"W21.29S89°38'06"E149.08 S00°21'54"W 21.12S45°21'54"W30.26S00°12'57"E145.04S86°59'44"E10 10 6610.0010101050.18 S00°00'03"E23.64S45°21'54"WS00°21'54"W 378.9519.05S89°38'06"E20.00S00°21'54"W19.05N89°38'06"WS00°21'54"W 328.85 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTDRAINAGE ANDUTILITY EASEMENTDRAINAGE ANDUTILITY EASEMENTDRAINAGE ANDUTILITY EASEMENTDRAINAGE ANDUTILITY EASEMENTDRAINAGE ANDUTILITY EASEMENT20.72S00°46'11"WL=52.42R=100.00Δ=30°02'09"26.52S82°57'10"E10 1010 S89°59'58"W 17.9845.69S22°08'06"E19.70ΔΔΔN89°38'06"W 82.24N00°21'54"E 10.61L=67.59R=60.00Δ=64°32'50"VACATED RIGHT OFWAY PER DOCNO.___________________BLOCK 1LOT 1ΔL=61.31 R=75.0 0 Δ=46°50'0 1" 10 32.59 22.27AVIENDA APARTMENTSDenotes 1/2 inch iron pipe monument foundDenotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron pipe monumentset, or to be set within one year of platting, andmarked by License No. 58896Bearings shown are based upon an east line ofOUTLOT B, AVIENDA ROWHOMES which has anassumed bearing of S00°21'54"W.NORTH0801601 INCH = 80 FEETSCALE IN FEETSec. 23, T. 116, R. 23Vicinity MapNo ScaleNW 1/4SW 1/4SE 1/4NE 1/4SITELyman Blvd.U.S. Hwy. No. 212 C.S.A.H. No. 18Powers Blvd.Detail ARestricted Access per Doc. No. A5034361 INCH = 40 FEET626 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION IN RE: Application of Level 7 Development LLC – Planning Case No. 2025-08, Avienda Apartments. Request for Final Plat Approval for a multi-family residential subdivision for a 412-unit apartment on approximately 11 acres on land identified in Exhibit A. Level 7 Development, LLC (Owner) is the current owner of the land identified in Exhibit A and which has applied for Final Plat approval. Inland Development Partners (Developer) has proposed to purchase the land identified in Exhibit A and proposes to construct a 412-unit apartment building on the same land. On September 22, 2025, the Chanhassen City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Level 7 Development LLC for a multifamily apartment development. The City Council and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The City Council approved the Preliminary Plat for Avienda Apartments with conditions on June 23, 2025. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Commercial uses which includes Regional Lifestyle Planned Unit Developments. 3. The legal description of the property is: (See Exhibit A) 4. SUBDIVISION FINDINGS a) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance. The subdivision as proposed adheres to the city’s zoning ordinances for the RLM and R-8 zoning districts and does not require variances to the citys ordinances. b) The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the City's Comprehensive Plan; The subdivision as proposed complies with the City’s Comprehensive Plan as well as applicable city, county, and regional plans. 627 2 c) The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and stormwater drainage are suitable for the proposed development; The applicant has prepared the necessary engineered drawings and design to establish that the topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and stormwater drainage are suitable for the proposed development. d) The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by the subdivision ordinance; The Applicant has made adequate provisions for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control, and all other improvements required by the subdivision ordinance. e) The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage subject to compliance with the conditions of approval; The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage based on its compliance to the proposed conditions of approval. f) The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; The Applicant has provided the necessary information to support that the proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. g) The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1) Lack of adequate stormwater drainage. 2) Lack of adequate roads. 3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4) Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. The proposed subdivision has adequate stormwater drainage, roads, sanitary sewer systems, and adequate off-site public improvement and support systems. 5. Prior to recording the Avienda Apartments Final Plat, the Developer of the Avienda Apartments project shall enter into a Development Contract with the City. DECISION The City Council adopts the attached findings of fact and decision that the City Council grants Final Plat approval for a multi-family residential subdivision for a 412-unit apartment building. 628 3 ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 22nd day of September, 2025. CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL BY:___________________________________ Its Mayor BY:_ __________________________________ Its City Manager 629 4 EXHIBIT A Outlot D, Avienda 630 City of Chanhassen A Community for Life Planning Case #2025-0 8 Avienda Apartments Applicant –Inland Development Partners & Level 7 Development Requesting Final Plat Approval 631 City of Chanhassen A Community for Life Preliminary Plat •Approved June 23rd •Next Steps •Plan Updates •Final Plat Approval •Development Contract Approval 632 City of Chanhassen A Community for Life Final Plat •Generally consistent with the approved preliminary plat •Shows necessary drainage and utility easement over all of Outlot A for temporary and permanent stormwater ponding •Provides easement over area with public utilities 633 City of Chanhassen A Community for Life Final Plat •Approval recommendation contingent on approval of a Development Contract between Developer and the City. •Final plans reviewed with the Development Contract •Final Plat approval only grants approval to location of proposed property boundaries. 634 City of Chanhassen A Community for Life Final Plat •Anticipated Development Contract request for approval on Oct 13th. •9/22 Final Plat approval gives a 3 week jumpstart on plat production and signature procurement prior to 10/13 Development Contract consideration. •The proposed grocer would like to see a land purchase for the apartment project prior to the grocer agreeing to a lease. •The city is exercising flexibility in the typical process, which would have the Final Plat and Development Contract up for approval concurrently. 635 City of Chanhassen A Community for Life CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION 636 City of Chanhassen A Community for Life Proposed Motion “The Chanhassen City Council approves the Avienda Apartments final plat as proposed and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision.” *The Findings of Fact and Decision include the requirement that the Developer enter into a Development Contract with the City as a condition of approval. 637 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Resolution 25-XX: Support for Suburban Transit Providers File No.Item No: H.3 Agenda Section GENERAL BUSINESS Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt Resolution 25-XX: Support for Suburban Transit Providers and direct staff to share with local legislators Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Operational Excellence SUMMARY The City of Chanhassen has been a member of SouthWest Transit since 1986, when Chaska, Chanhassen, and Eden Prairie made the decision to opt out of the Metropolitan Transit Commission transit system under Minnesota State Statutes. Together, they formed their own transit service, SouthWest Metro Transit, through a joint powers agreement. The attached resolution highlights the importance of maintaining a strong and resilient transit system— one that supports economic vitality, environmental sustainability, and the overall quality of life for our west metro communities and the metropolitan region as a whole. It also reaffirms the critical role of Suburban Transit Providers, including SW Transit, and the governance model that ensures local communities have a direct voice in shaping solutions that reflect evolving demographics and local priorities. With conversations at the Legislature continuing regarding the future of regional transit, this resolution is intended to help ensure that Chanhassen and other communities served by suburban transit providers have the strongest voice possible in future decisions that affect public transit. 638 Similar resolutions have been adopted by the SW Transit Commission and the City of Shakopee, with additional suburban providers and cities considering the same in the coming weeks. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Resolution 639 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: September 22, 2025 RESOLUTION NO: 2025-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: WHEREAS, the Cities of Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, Chaska, Victoria, and Carver are currently served by Southwest Transit, a high-performing, locally governed transit agency; WHEREAS, Southwest Transit has been consistently recognized for its efficiency, innovation, and customer satisfaction, and has successfully adapted service levels and innovations to meet the unique needs of southwest suburban communities; WHEREAS, the opt-out transit model has allowed cities like Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, Chaska, Victoria, and Carver to maintain local oversight, ensuring accountability, flexibility, and a direct connection to the residents who rely on and fund the service; WHEREAS, a proposal under consideration of the Minnesota Legislature aims to eliminate suburban transit agencies and consolidate transit operations under Metro Transit, effectively removing local control and potentially diminishing service quality and responsiveness for suburban communities; WHEREAS, a one-size-fits-all regional model could limit the ability of Southwest Transit to respond to changing demographics, employment patterns, and ridership preferences in communities like Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, Chaska, Victoria, and Carver; WHEREAS, local control is essential for ensuring responsible use of taxpayer dollars, timely innovation, and equitable service tailored to specific community needs; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL: We encourage the Minnesota Legislature, the Governor, and the Metropolitan Council to continue working in partnership with suburban transit communities to preserve and strengthen a transit system that respects local governance, builds on past success, and reflects the diverse needs of the region. Therefore , the City of Chanhassen: - Does not support any proposal to eliminate opt-out transit services, recognizing their essential role in providing responsive, high-quality transportation for our residents - Urges legislation that supports fair and equitable distribution of sales ta x 640 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 22nd day of September 2025. ATTEST: Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 641 City Council Item September 22, 2025 Item Correspondence Letter File No.Item No: K.1 Agenda Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Prepared By Jenny Potter, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND The attached letter was dropped off at City Hall with a note to please include in the council packet. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 642 Letter from Carver County resident 643 644