CC Agenda 07-20-1981 (2)-DoY1
AGENDA
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, JULY 20, 1981, 7:30 p.M.
CHANHASSEN MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 690 COULTER DRIVE
CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance)
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
PUBLIC HEARINGS None
APPROVAI OF MINUTES
?9
1. 7:30 p.m City CouncilCity CounciJ.
Minutes da
Minutes da
ed June
ed July
29 , 1.981 .6, 1981.
tt
UNF'INISHED BUSINESS
Commission Minutes.
Fox Chase (Derri.ck Land
PIan Review.
2. 7:45 p.m Development) , Final Development
Council procedures allow for the presentationreguired, the item will be tabled to the nextfor publication and review of items prior to
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
APP ROVAL OF ACCOUNTS
3. 9:00 p,m
NEW BUSINESS
of items. If action isreqular aqenda to aI Iowfinal consideration.
4. 9:15 p.m
Bil-ls dated July 20, 1981.
Final Development and Site plan Review, CSouth of Highway 5 and East of Dakota.
P.T. Corporation,
Preliminary Development and Site plan Review, InstantWeb, Inc., 1041 Powers Btvd.
Concept Plan for Realiqnment ofAvenue Intersection.Highway 101 and Dakota
a Ke rber
(August
Drive, Set Special Assessment Hearing Date,
b. Downtown
17, 1981).
Redeve lopment Project,
5. 1-0:00 p.m
5, 10:30 p.m
7. 11:00 p.m
CONSENT AGENDA
Set Special Meeting Date.
1981 Bonding,
COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
11:30 p.m. - Adjournment
Item *1
MINUTE S
CoNTINUATION OF BoARD OF REVIEW MEETING: Cral g Zinter, Carver County Assessor, and
Lana Larson of the Assessorrs Office r{ere present to respond to questions ralsed duringthe Board of Revle\,, Hearing held June 8, 1981. The Assessorrs Office made thefollowlng recommenda t ions :
25-36-000-0600-000 Maynard Happe. Recommended no change.
25-72-500-0001 thru 0013 sunnyslope Addition. Recomnended no change ln lot values.
25-72-000-0020-000 Sunnyslope Horneowners Assn. Recomlended no adjustment.
2 5-05-000-0181-000 John Ziegler. Recommended no change in classification.
2 5-02-000-00 75-000 James E. Vonlorenz, Recom[ended no adjustment.
2 5-78-000-0012-000 Tro1l's Glen llomeor,ner I s Assn. Recormrended no change.
2 5-78-000-0013-000 Trollts Glen Homeor.mer I s Assn. Reconmended no change.
25- 78 -000-0005-000 Charles Crompton. Recommended an adjustment of value from
114,700 to 113,600.
25-64-000-0001-000 Sunrise liills Homeownerr s Assn. Recornmended no change.
2 5-48-100-0029-000 Outlot A. Hesse Farm 2nd. Recourmended value be adjusted
from 15,000 to 7,500,
25-48-100-0018-000 Roman Roos. Recommended adjustmenr from 209,600 to 192,400,
25-48-100-0031-000 Outlot C, Road. Hesse Farm 2nd. Recomnended property beclassified tax exemp t .
2 5-08-000-0217-000 Eugene Fuss. Recommended no change.
2 5-05-000-0179-000 Charles Lawson. Recomrended no change in clas sif lcati-on,
25-42-O0O-0225-O0O James Cranston. Reconmended a reduction from 42,600 to 34,400,
2 5-4 2-000-0218-000 Janes CransEon. Recournended no change.
2 5-06-000-0184-000 Howard Ha11gren. Recoromended no adjustment ln classificatlon.
2 5-f3-000-0 38 7-000 Norman C. Grant. Recorrnended no adjustment.
2 5-06-000-018 2-000 Recommended no change in classification.
2 5-59-500-0001-000 Edwin Seim. Recommended no change.
2 5-14-000-0406-000 B. C, Burdlck. Recornrnended chassification be changed from
commercial to vacant. 1and.
2 5-01-000-0020-000 Jean Lovetang. Recorunended no change in value.
Councilman Gevlng moved to adjust the Estimated Market Value on parcel 25-36-000-0600
to Land $28,600, Buildings 20,000. Motlon seconded by Acting Mayor Neveaux. The
following voted in favor: Acting l,layor Neveaux and Councilman Gevlng. Councilman
Horn voted no. Motion carried.
Councilman Gevlng moved to leave all the beach lots identified as, 25-72-000-0020,
25-78-000-0013, and 25-64-000-0001' renain as of 1980 estirnated narket vaIue. The
County Assessor rework all beach 1ot figures across the board for valuation in 1982
as proposed by Mr. Zinter. Motion seconded by Acting Mayor Neveaux ' The following
voted in favor: Acting Mayor Neveaux and Councllman Gevlng. Councilman llorn voted
no. Motion carried.
Mayor Hamilton came at t.his point in the meeting.
Councilrnan Horn moved that due to the fact that. the street and utlllties have not been
accepred by the ciEy rhat Lots 1 and 2, 4 through 9 and 12 and 13' Sunnyslope Addilion
be placed at the 1980 estimated market value and Lots 10 and 11 be set at $8'000
each estimated market value. Motion seconded by Councilman Geving. The following
voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councllmen Neveaux, Gevlng, and llorn. No negatl-ve
votes. Motion carried.
-t
l
1
a
SPECIAL CoUNCIL MEETING AND ooNTINUATIoN 0F BoARD oF REvIEw MEETING JUNE 29, 1981
Acting Mayor Neveaux called the neetlng to order wlth the following members presenr:
councllmen Geving and Horn. Mayor Hamil-ton and councilwoman swenson cane laEe.
Council Meering June 29, 1981 -2-
Couneilnan Horn moved that r^rith the exception of propertles fhat have hadinprovements on rhemi i.e' 25-48-100-oo1g, z5-42-ooo-ozrg-000, and 25-06-000-0184,the Council keep all propertles at the 19g0 estimated market value untll thecouncll can get a handle on what the formulars are, what the areas are thathave been covered. and how the equalizatlon works in areas that are physlcallyvalued.
25-05-000-0181 - John Zj:eELer
25-02-000-0075 - James Von]_orenz
25-78-000-0005 - Charles Crompton
25-08-000-0217 - Eugene Fuss
25-05-000-0179 - Charles Lawson
25-02-000-0066 & 25-02-000-0070 - 41 Harvey25-L3-000-0387 - Norman cranr
25-06-000-0182 - Barbara Headla
t'
25-08-000-0195 - Ed Worm
Moti.on seconded by Councllnan Geving, The following voted in favor: MayorHamilton, Councilrnan Neveaux, Geving and Horn. No negatlve votes. Motion carrled.
councilman Gevlng moved to accept the Assessorrs recomendatlons to reduceparcel 25-48-100-0029 to 7,500 and parcer 25-48-100-0018 to 192,400 anJ crassitypareel 25-48-100-0031 ro t.x exempt status. MoEion seconded by councilnanNeveaux. The following voted in favorr *layor Hanilton, councilmen Neveaux,Geving, and Horn. No negative votes. Motiln carried.
Counc1lr,:oman Swenson came al this point in the meeting.
Councilman Geving noved Eo accept the Assessorrs valuation of $34,400 on parcel25-42-000-0225 and leave pareel 25-42-ooo-021g Lrith an estimated market varueof 95,700' Motlon seconded by councilman Neveaux. The following voted 1n favor:Mayor Hamilton, CounciLwoman Swenson, Councilmen Neveaux, Cevingl and iorn. Nonegative votes. MoEion carried.
councilman ceving moved that parcel 25-06-000-01g4 have an estimated marketvalue for land of 23'175 and buildings of 104,400. uotton seconJui-ufio.n. r"r,Neveaux. The following voEed in favor: I,Iayor Hamilton, Councllmen Neveaux,Geving, and Horn. Councilwoman Swenson absiained, Motion carried.
Councilu,n Gevj-ng noved to designate the followlng properiies as agricuLturalclassiflcatlon for 1981 valuatlon:
25-06-000-0182 - Barbara l{eadla
25-05-000-0181 - John Zlegler
25-06-000-0184 - Howard Hall gren
25-05-000-0179 - Charles Lawson
25-02-000-0065 - 41 Harvey
25-02-000-0070 - A1 Harvey
25-08-000-0196 - Ed Worm
The Assessorrs reeornmenda E ions for the following parcels be approved:25-07-000-0188 - Seyrnour Trumble
25-08-000-0216 - Timorhy Fisher
25-08-000-0L99 - Charles LaneMotlon seconded by Mayor HamilEon. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hami.rton,and councllman Gevlng. councilmen Horn and Neveaux voted no, councilwomanSwenson abstained. Motlon failed.
Counci.Lman Horn requesEed that entire Carver County be governed wlth thecriterla as applled i.n Chanhassen for hobby farms.same
t_
Council Meetlng June 29, 1981 -3-
1
r SHoOTING BAN oRDINANCE: Several members of the Ad Hoc Committee as vrell as other
interested persons were present.
Councilwoman Swenson moved to accept the recomtrendatlons of the Ad Hoc Comittee
and incorporati.ng the changes discussed tonighE being:
Sectlon 1.02 (1) Applications for private bow and arrow ranges shal1 be approved
by the Clty Manager after being advertlsed in the ne$rspaper, notificatlon of
adjacent property oumers and approval by the Sherlffrs Department. If there
are objectlons to the proposed range, the applicatlon w111 be presented to the
City Council for act lon .
Section 2.05. Including dog training.
Section 2.O7 (2). A one-year permit Day be issued by the City councll Eo an
or^,ner/lessee of land zoned as agricultural for the slaughter of domestic anlmals.
Section 2.08. l^Ieapon Permits shall be personal to the appllcant, and shall not be
transferable from one person Eo another, or from one style weapon to another,
or from the location for which the subject weapon pernlt was issued, and no
applicant sha11 use the subject weapon for purposes other than those specifically
descrlbed in the permlt therefor.
Section 3.01 (b) That part of the City of Chanhassen bounded by PLoneer Trall on the
north, the qrestern city boundary on the t est, to the Chicago Northwestern Railroad
Tracks on the south, to Bluff Creek Drive heading southeasterly to Hlghway 2L2 and
to Hlghway 101 on the east.
Section 3.01 (g) Establish a separate section for Dog Tralning eliminating the
necessity for a permj.t.
Section 3.01 (f). The plat of The Hesse Farm lying west of State Highlray 101.
Section 8. The City of Chanhassen shal1 send out written notices to adjacent property
owners not less than 10 days prior Eo the conmencenent of Ehe monitored hunting
period.
Motion seconded by Councllman llorn. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton,
Councilwoman Swenson, Councilmen Neveaux ' Geving' and Horn. No negative votes.
Motion carried.
Councilman llorn moved to adjourn. Motion seconded by Councilman Geving. The
following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilron, Councilwoman Swenson, Councilmen Neveaux,
Geving, and Horn. Meeting adjourned at l:00 a.m.
Don Ashworth
City Manager
1
I
Counci.lman Horn moved to close the Board of Review Meetlng. Motion seconded by
Councilman Geving. The following voted in favor: Mayor l{amilton, Councllwoman
slrenson, Councilmen Neveaux, Gevlng, and Horn. No negatlve votes. Hearing closed
at 10:4 5 p. m.
-t
SPECIAL CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MEETING JIJLY 6, 1981
Mayor Hamilton called the neeting to order at 7:30 p.Er. r.rith the following menberspresent: Councilwoman Swenson, Councilmen Horn, Geving, and Neveaux,
AWARD 0F BTDS, 1981 BONDING, D0h't{ToI^IN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT: Bob Sander, Juran and
Moody, presented the bid that was received at the opening earlier ln the day. Thebid was from Bank Northwest as Manager with the First NaEional Bank of Minneapolls
as joint Manager with a net interest rate of LL.42"l.
Councilman Neveaux moved to reject the bid from Bank Northwest at a net interest rateof LL.42% and dlrect Juran and Moody to return the $94,340 good falth check. Further
direct Juran and Moody to continue negotiations over a 30 day period of time to
attempt to come in at a 10.802 net interest rate or lower and report back to the
Councll , Motlon seconded by Councilman Horn. The following voted j-n favor: Mayor
HamilEon, Councilwoman Swenson, Councilmen Neveaux, Geving, and Horn. No negaEive
votes. Motion carried.
AMERICAN LEGION SEWER AND WATER PROJECT PTJBLIC HEARING: Councilwoman Swenson moved
to postpone the public hearing to July 13, 1981, at 7:30 p.n, Motion seconded by
Councj-lman Geving. The following voted in favor: Mayor Hauilton, Councilwoman Swenson,
Councj-1men Neveaux, Geving, and Horn. No negatlve votes. Motion carried.
Don Ashworth
City ManagerT
I
Councilman Geving moved to adjourn. Motion seconded by Councilman l{orn. The
following voted in favor: Mayor Hamilton, Councilwouran Sr{renson, Councilmen Neveaux,
Geving, and Horn. No negatlve votes. Meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.n.
MINUTES OF THE RNGULAR
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION I'IEETING
HELD JLINE 24 , L98I, AT 7: 30 P.!1.
CHANHASSEN CITY HAIL
I"lembers Present:Chairman A. Partridge , J
Ivl. Thompson , H. Noz iska ,
Mark Koeg1er, from Schoel and Ivladson, gavethe City is at with regards to getting the
by I,letro Counc iI.
staff Present:B. Waj.bel, !1. Koegler, and B. Foreman
Review Comprehensj-ve Plan Draft Amendments:
APFNOVED ON!r -i -.]E
Thompson, C. Watson
W. Thompson and L. Conrad.
a review of where
MUSA line approved
-ra
J. Thompson indicated that he agrees with Metro CounciI, Chan-
hassen has not grown to much in the past.
Koegler stated that
they are right next
Eden Prairie is in a
to Chanhassen .
building boom now and
Waibel asked what about all the development that has already
occured with sewer promised. Koegler indicated that the devel-
opments that have been approved wiLl have to occur at a slower
rate than expected.
Koegler explained that Metro council could take estimated sewer
capacity from a city that is not growing as fast as they expected
and give it to Chanhassen. He doubted it they would do it.
Conrad stated that Chanhassen has onLy grown 308 in the
years. 908 of the population cannot afford to get into
with the economy the way it is now. Do we really exPect
much growth? Noziska stated that the economy works on a
and he feels that the housing boom wiII come back.
Iast 10
hous ingthat
pende 1um
Koegler indicated that at the time of submittal of Chanhassen
Comprehensive PIan that the Mayor wilt submit a cover letter to
Chairman weaver and also a plan amendment.
Rev j-ew Victoria Comprehensive Plan:
Noziska suggested that chanhassen get together with other cities
with the same problem and go to talk to lletro Councif together.
Should have some developers come along too who will be affected
by thi.s change.
Partridge stated that Koegler should get a representative from
Metro Council to come to the JuIy l5th meeting.
Watson indicated that she
Hwy #5. Chanhassen wants
does not
it to be
agree with their Plan for
an intermediate arterial.
P lann ing
June 24,
Page 2
Corunissi.on !.{inutes
198r
Conrad asked if Victorial bike paths wj.I1 fine up with ours?stated that Chanhassen doesn't have any bike trails plannedthat area and there are no plans to join them.
Waibelfor
J. Thompson made a motj-on to have staff send a letter to Victoriaincluding the comments from the Planning Report. Second by M.Thompson. AII voted in favor and the motion was ca.rried.
X.ev j-e'\r Proposed Amendments to Carver County Comprehensive Plan:
Waibel indicated that with this
Regional Parks.
plan Chanhassen can use their
Watson stated that Carver County shows Hwy 5 as a minor arterial,
Chanhassen wouLd like to see it as an intermedi-ate.
J. Thompson made a motion, second by M. Thompson to have staff
send, a letter to Carver County and include the co[unents in thePlanning Report and the comrents by the Planning Commission.
A11 voted in favor and the motion was carried.
Sketch Plan Review Continuation, Quady Property, Carver BeachPropertie s Inc.:
)WaibeL read the Planning Report to
Mr. Hess, representative for Quadydo not have a topo for the property
about 3 weeks.
the Planning Commission.
Property, stat.ed that theyyet but j.t wilL be done in
Waibel explained that Lots 25 and 26 are prominant run off areas.waibel suggested that Lots 25 and 26 could have a man made stormholding system put in or the lots could be left as is with no
development and be used as a natural holding pond. Also erosioncontrol will have to be look into.
Waj-bel- suggested t.hat the pedestrian path should be vacat.ed from
were it is now and moved to be next to the road. Then laterthe path could be joined with the paths on Kerber Drive.
Hess indicated that there are sebrer assessments on Lots 25 and 26
and drainage couLd be put in. AIso there is a road access tothem. Hess has a 40r right-of-way on the sketch but it could
be changed to 50' if tha9s what the Colrunissj-on wants.
Watson stated that she feels there are to many proposed Lots for
such a small area. Hess indicated that originally he had pro-
IEed 29 lots now he only has 26 lots.
)
P lann ing
June 24,
Page 3
Conunission Minutes
198r
Hobbs, a neighboring property owner, indicated that he would 1j.keto see the lots about the same size as those i_n the area. He likes
how the proposed road is going to lj-ne up with Lake Lucy Road.
M. Thompson indicated that he would like to see larger lots becausemore of the area around this property is larger lots. He askedif Mr. Hess had talked with any of the neighbors. tlr. Hessindicated that he hadn rt.
Hess explained that because of the cost squeeze there is a trend
coming with smaller lots and larger homes.
M. Thompson indicated that the area has at least 20,000 squarefeet and up, he would like to 18,000 square feet mj-nimum.
Hess stated. that economically he didn't know about fewer 1ots,but he indicated that the area with the 11,700 square foot lots
\,rou1d not look bad because they would be shaded with trees.
Watson stated that she would like to 20,000 square foot lots.
Conrad was concerned about Lots 25 and 26 if they are buildable?
Noziska indicated that Lots 25 and 25 would have to be Iooked
at by the Engineer.
M. Thompson made a motion to al1ow
and 2 more if the south section islack of a second,
16 lots onbuildable.
the north portion
Motion died from
Conrad made a moti-on to allow 18 lots on north section. Seconded
by watson. Conrad, Watson and ,f. Thompson - aye, Partridge,
Noziska, w. Thompson and M. Thompson voted nay. Motion failed.
.I . Thompson made a motion seconded by W. Thompson to a1low 20
lots on the north sectj.on with an outlot. J. Thomspon,
Noziska, Partridge and w. Thompson voted aye and Watson, Conrad
and M. Thompson voted nay. I4otion failed.
Review 208 Water Q uality Manaqement Plan Amendments:
Waibel indicated that the Mayor is going to send a letter
regarding this matter to the Chairman of Ivletro Council.
read the Planning Commission parts of what is going to be
the Ietter.
Wa ibe I
in
I
\
-,\
Mr. Hess indicated that, if Surunit Drive !,rere vacated he couldtake out lot 20 and make the other lots some larger. If theroad were not vacated he would be loosing a lot plus having topay for another road.
The Pl-anning comrnission endorses the letter being sent.
Planning Commission Minutes
,fune 24, 1981
Page 4
Approval of llinutes:
Conrad indicated
the May 27, ]-98L
that the lst paragrap
meeting should read "
the second page of
requirements "
hon
DNR
M. Thompson made a motion seconded by Noziska to accept theminutes of the May 27, t98I meeting noting that this meetingwas very long and a lot of the public didn't identify them-sel-ve it made it hard to take accurate minut.es. A1I votedin favor and the motion was carried.
Watson mad.e a motion seconded by Conradof the June I0, 1981 meeting. Carried.
Thompson abstained.
to
J
Noziska made a mot,ion seconded by W. Thompsonof the June 1, 1981 City Council meeting. AII
and the motion was carried.
accept the minutes
Thompson and M.
to note the minutes
voted in favor
The meeting was adjourned at 12:00 a.m.
CITY OF
TH[NH[SSEN
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ :
Mayor and City Council
Don Ashworth, City Manager
JuIy 20, 1981
Fox Chase (Derrick Land Development), Final Development
PIan Review
On June 1, 1981 the Council considered four alternative approachesfor proceeding with review of the Derrick Development plans:
I. Status - July 2l , L980 PIan Approval. (attached)
II.
I1I. Kathy Schwartz Reportto Such Report.
of May 2 | lggL and Responses
Council action ofaIl conditions setplan requests.
,June
in 1, 1981 was to require the developer,JuIy of 1980 prior to considering any
to meet
amended
Attached find the report of the City Engineer regarding the currentstatus of each of the twenty conditions set in 1980. Based on thatreport, this office believes that the developer has met thoseconditions. The Council should recognize that most of these condi-tions would be placed into specific tanguage within the developmentcontract and that, if an interpretation were required, it would bediscussed as a part of the development contract approval. As thedecision as to trhether the 20 conditions have been met is beingdecided in ad.vance of development contract preparation, the Councilshould review each of the 20 conditions and make a decision as tocompliance or non-compl iance.
690 COULTER DFIVE ' P.O. BOX 147 ' CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
Status Report - Final Development Plan Amendment Request,
Fox Chase Addition, Derrick. (attached)
fV. Kathy Schwartz Report of l4ay 26, ]-9gl.
one condition not incLuded in Juty of 19go is a permit requirement fromthe u.s. corp of Engineers. As.city council actions .urrndt supersedereguirements of the corp of Engineers, any conditions estabrisired bythe corp wouLd be i-n addi"tion to those of the city. (A hearing uy itreCorp has been set for early Auqust. ) As such, tha City Councii's-alternative actions could include:
1). A decision that the previous 20 conditionsor partially been met, in which case:
a) .The Council determines that the developer, through hisown inactj-on, is soIe1y responsible foi not meetinq theconditions and must therefore carryout furr resubmfssiontight of. the. expiration of one year period (althoughthis option is included under slate iaw, it isrecommended that a specific opinion regardi.ng thisspecific development be souqht if this course of actionis de sired )
b). t _ duy time extension of the development plan approvatis agreed to the City and developer to resoive .oiaiti.orr"sti1l unclear (potentially including submj-ssi""-"i tn"U. S. Corp permit).
2') - A decision that the 20 conditions have been met, including:
a). A written statement from the developer acknowledgingthat he recocrnizes conditions set by the Corp "i'n"!:-"_eers supersede and are in addition to those of ttre Ci-ty;or
extension of the development plan approvalby the City and developer so ai to aiiowtime to obtain the Corp of Engineer,s permit;
have not totally
1n
b). A
-
day timeis agreed tothe developer
or
c).I -
d.y time extenslgn of the development. plan approval
-1: ??r:"d to by-rhe City and developui, ar.ing wfrictr timevarlous approvals can be considered (p1ans / spec i fications ,preparation/approval of the developmeit contract, sub_mittal/approval of performance secirrities, etc.); butr-n no case shall the development contract or plat besigned until conditj-ons of the corp of inginelrs f,avebeen met.
Thi-s office and staff recommend2c, from above.that the Council approve alternatj-ve
As the council witl recarr, this entire issue originated as a part ofthe deveropers request to amend. the deveropment plan at or about thefir:!. ?f the year.- rf the Council acrs-to deteririne that oiiginalconditions have not been met, thenrthat decision would tikerrrise alsorequire totar resubmission oi th" pr"p"""a amended plan. However,
if the Council chooses to permit extension, in whatever form,
should also encompass the right of the developer to seek the
to that plan during that same period of time.
such
amendment
I
t C*,
oL
q.l
CITY OF
EHINHISEEN
Don Ashvrorth , City Manager
BilI Monk, City Engineer
July 14, L981
Fox Chase Preliminary PLat Conditions
690 COULTER DBIVE . P.O, BOX ,I47
' CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 5531 7
(612) 937-1900
Both this report and the developers document package are ntunberedto reference a previous staff report (attached) listing the20 conditions of the preliminary plat approvaj, on July 21, 1980,
1. -Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District has issued a gradingpermit with conditions. Watershed correspondence confirmingthis action is attached.
TO:
FROI'I:
DATE:
RE:
-MN DNR has issued a grading and utility permit with conditions.
Confirming correspondence is attached.
-cornments of the SCS originaL report have been used to revisethe grading plan, and SCS engineering staff has assisted thisoffice in reviewing and revising the retention pond desj,gn.
SCS correspondence is attached, but no letter of approval
or disapprovat is inc luded since ScS is an advisory body.
-Although the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers was not listed,
this group does have reguLatory cont,rol of this project as
regards construction within the Type II Wetlands (retentj.on
pond). I have been informed (verbally) by Corp staff that a
public hearing will be held on August 5. Approval, if granted,
could be expected within 25 to 45 days after the hearing.
2. The permit status is listed as Part of condition No. l.
3. The soil conditions in the area below the 900 el-evation
contour are Poor and unsuitable for any tyPe of development
facilities. The location of the pedestrian trail- is detailed
in Condition No. 7 and the conservation easement in Cond-
ition No. 10.
4. At the request of this office, the Petitioner is pl-atting a
temporary cul-de-sac at the construction terminus of Fox Path'
rhii altows the City max imum flexibility as to the design of
the turn-around. The easement outside the permanent 50'
right-of-way would be vacated with the extension of Fox
Path .
5
L2.
This condition states that Fox path be constructed to a widthof 36 feet whil-e all side streets be constructed to a widthof 32 feet. It should be noted that the petitioner and arearesidents have requested a reduction in the proposed streetcross section to conform with other streets in the area.
6
Unless the condition is modified, the constructionwiII reflect the definition stated above.
plans
Park and Recreation Commission mi-nutes of the trail locationreview are attached.
7. The pedestrian easement is proposed to be located over thesanitary sewer which foll-ows the 900 elevation contour acrossLots 3,4,5,6,7,8, and 9 of Block 3. The trail would then beincorporated within the right-of-way of Fox path. Thisalignment allows for a proper base to insure the trail'sstability. The petitioner proposes to provide this easementby legal description instead of on the p1at.
8. Schoe}l & Madson, Inc. shal1 prepare the final constructionplans as well as perform construction inspection and staking.
9. No further conunents reguired.
r0.The Pedestrian trail is discussed in ltem 7. The conservation
easement must be ]egally defined (be1ow the 900 elevationcontour) and incLuded in the development contract.
Compliance trith the conditions of the agency approval.s aslisted in ftem 1 shall be required by the City as well asthe agencies.
The
onealI
the
developer proposes to perform the entire site grading asoperation. This incLudes grading the streets as well asgrading necessary to render the lots buil-dable with
excavatj"on and embankment quantities supplied fromsite.
The developer will be disturbing a J.arge portion of the siteto perform this operation but all areas not needed for thesite grading wiIJ- be left undisturbed in its natural state.
l-4. Degree of engineering and inspection will be assured by thisoffice with the assistance of Schoell & Madson Inc. as the
City's agent. The necessary escrows wil-I be supplied throughthe development contract.
Page 2
11.
13. This condition shall be incorporated into the development
contract.
3Page
16.
t7.
r8.
19.
The plan submitted closely resembles the plan approved onJuly 20, 1980 with 52 lots. Both plans will be availablefor review at the meeting.
Al-1 street ordinances shaLl be met except for the threelocations where the maximum street grade .(7?) is exceeded.This deviation from ordinance was approved as Item 20.
Construction plans wi]1 be reviewed by this office to insurecompliance with City standards and specifications.
Construction plans will be reviewed by thj-s office
compliance with City standards and specifications.not presently proposed to loop the \^ratermain basedfeasibility. The watermain could be looped in thewith the extension of Fox Path.
to insureIt is
on economic
future
Construction plans will be reviewed. by this office to insure
compliance with City standalds and spec if icatj.ons .
20. Refer to Item 16.
SECTION I
Status July 21, 1980 PIan Approval
Attached please find a report from the City Attorney's office which,basically, states that the developer has one year in which to completeconditions set by the City Council. Stated another way, the developer
must meet the conditions of the final development plan approval prior to
asking for preliminary plat approval and he has the one year period oftime, from final development pJ.an approval to complete these conditions
and request preliminary plat approval. In the specific case of Fox
Chase Addition, the developer has until JuIy 21, 1981 to meet theconditions set by the City Council-. Attached please find a listing ofall conditions that were set as a part of the JuIy 21, 1980 approval.Although discussion may have occurred by !4r. Derrick in regards to a
number of the points, basj.cally a majority of the conditions set by theCity Councj-1 have not been met. It should be recognized, however, thatMr. Derrj-ck still has until July 21st, 1981 to complete these conditionsand that some of the conditions relate to work that woulil be necessary
af ter prel.iminary plat approval i,ras given. Theref ore , conilitionsassociated with specific construction plans or the actual constructionitself would typically become a part of the preliminary plat approvaland incorporated into the ilevelopmenL contract but 1ogica1ly would notbe completed prior to prelimi-nary plat approval.
Conditions of A ril 7 1980
Soil Conservation ServiceI'linnesota Department of NaturalRil,ey Purgatory Creek Watershed
Re s ource sDistrict
3
4
2
5
That said approvals be received priorbeing resubmitted to the City Councilplat approval.
That the pedestrian and conservation easement portionof the proposed development must be shown by ti.reappLicant to have such soil- conditions as would allowfor the development of such facilities, and that theapplicantr s soil condition evidence is to be reviewedby the city Engineer.
That the applicant prepare cul-de-sac plans
roadway portion in the vicinity of lot 20,and lot 24, block I. Said plans are to beand approved by the city engineer.
to the matterfor preliminary
for theblock 3
reviewed
5
Paved street surfaccs are to be 36 feet wide andpaved cul-de-sacs are to be 32 feet in diameter.
That the Park..and Recreation Commission reviewalternative trail- locations between pleasant ViewRoad and the conservation easement and is to submita recomrnendation to the City Council_.
t
1.+That the applieant receive approval of theirgrading p1an, drainage plan and erosion control planfrom the
l-
L
L
L
L
L
L
l.
Conditions of
7 The location of the trail is still uncertain atthis time, i.e. whether along ifr"-U.lX l-or linesor abutting the street on th; north end of thedevelopment. In meeting with the paiX anaRecreation Commission, [.he develop".= -froru
statedtheir desire to have ihis decisioir wittne:.a untitgrading is commenced and park and necilationCommissi,oners afforded an opportunii"-ao walk bothpotential locations. .fhis sugge"tioi upp..r= tocreate some problems in prepaiitio., of l- development
::lt::":-J?utlinins two potentiar locition ur..."), -
Dur no other reasonable alternative appears to exist.However, in acceoti lg the finaf aevei5i.u.,t pt.n,it should be clear riar the "rtr"t'liI! i= f.i.rrgaccepted as a conservation area and, is ,u"h, ,ropark credits are being given. Further, that it
:"-ao. the advantag. oi i.tu a.".f"p.r-tl n.,re thed rooc t.raLl_ through the conservation and, hrhethersuch be within thii conservation area or partiallyadjacent to the road, that aerref of"is lgree to gradeand install wood chips for the trl:-i-:-n accordancewirh rhe recommendations of th"-;;;; iia necreati-oncommi-ssion as a part of their """iiir-9."ain9 piu".
As a part of both the East Lotus Lake project andNear l{ountaj.n development proposals, significanidiscussion occurred. in. regira! t"-tf.,u-CitV, s .Uitity
::^::::I: that.pubric impiovements are-de-sisned and-:l:!..!:d to City standards. In conformance withE.nese drscussj.ons, it is recommended that. the devel-operbe required to use the city'" ."gi"".i'-ror pr"fir"riir,-of. plans and specification-s ""a ii-j-"l"king andinspection.
The above conditions are in addition to those outli-nedby the Land use coordinator i" hi;-;";;rrs of July 9il9_11: ?ld the Ensineer,s report "i-5"ry Z__suchor.sregard.Lng those variances approved by-the Citycouncil during preliminary au"Li-1.""t-ilur,' afpii,*,ar,i.e. length of cuL-de-sac! and stieet-grades.
I
I
r\
E
l
I
r
T
F
E
E
I
E
t
o
Conditions of July 9, 1980
10.That a conservat ion
-
e asemen t be established withinthe area below the 900 fool-.i;";;;;" pursuant to theComprehensive plan and that ,itni"-l"ia conservationeJsement, a oedo5llisn_way easem"nt-U. aeaicatel--,^.that is a feet "iau-"itr]-i_";;;.=;; either side forpurposes of maintenalge (tfre ilovJ'wouf,a nullify theproposed 20 foot trail- u"=u.u.,t-iidicated on theproposed preliminary pLat dateJ lo"r-fZ, 1980, withthe undersru"ut"?.!lu:_ah.-;;;;..,irescribea easemenrwould be establiihed upon completion ot a feasibleroute vrithin the conseivation^ ."=".""t I .
11.That the applicant and its contractors, includingnome builders, carry out the constiictron of.r.mprovemenrs and stiuctures in ;;;;;;"r,"u with therequirements set forth lV -tfr."
Riley Purqatorv creek watershed Districtsoil Cons6rvation- service E";i;u;i;" Reportdated June 18, 19BO
(The City Council recommendation is that the approvalsbe obtained before tf.r.i, ,"*ri"v"oi"ai" preliminarypr.at. For sualifi::t+;; F;;;:";; iie nirey pursatorvcreek r,rarershed Disrrict iras. ;i;;; ;""""diriona1approval in their.y"y g, fg s O 7
-"oirlspondence,
however,the soil conservarioi,-s.r"i""l ;;i;;-"" advisorybody, wilI not oiven I sic j-r"&.,-Iipi"r"r. However,r believe such frav b.'=;;i=;i;; If;I;;s" carryinq ourtheir reco:rmendations d;;-;;;; ,.,'o'iII t' tr,"i.,evaluation report) .
12.That extra precautionsexLstLng vegetation maycon s truc tion .
be taken
be kept
so
to that removal ofa minimum during
L..
i:
L
L
L
L
L
L
13.For reasons of soil conditions and slopes, the buildinoplans ror alr residen;;;-;;;;;";i*ri.nin the subjectdeveLopmenr should-b" ;;.'ri;i;;";y":" archirecr orcivi-l- engineer registered in tf,.-itJt" of Minnesota.
,o.1l1a the. applicant. be required to posr sufficienrescrows to assure that. the degree ii' ""q
j."""ii.,; -and inspection is carried ";a';;
-.;:onunended by theRiIcy purqarory creek r+atersheJ DiIiri"t and theSoi l- Conservat-ion Scrvice.
Council approval ofas presentcd on July
15. Submit and receivebascd on the plansuch ro 52 IoLs.
development olan.21, 1980, cfranginq
L
L
lF
3c-
)
r4
F-l
I
r.
t{
Conditions of Julv 7, 1980
tJ
lrE
t:L
IJ
l-
L5
LX
H
tJ
u
L]
Ll
Ll
LJ
=L]
LX
LJ
L,i
16.
17.
18.
19.
20-
a
STREETS.
.1 1r. right-of -rv;.y and street rvidths mee t the ord.inance f orresidential street. Iiowever, it seems. to me that the maintreet through the developnrent rvi1l ultj:nately be a collectortreet---thus a ryider street r^ridth should be considerecl-
.. _ rntersection racii are not sholvn and shouLcl l:e irdicated'-as -20 .feet- Grade on street ,rr1,' exceec]s both the Zla m.:_xi-u:,rand 3ilo within 3O feet of cul-de-s . Vertical curves oncul-de-sacs ,,8,' ( u'p-cer end) and "O,, (at intersectio.r) aie f.=,"than 20 times the a1g=braic difference as recl:ired. by ordinance-nCul-de-sac ,,8" also exceeds the 5OO foot maximum fenltfr- Themethod.of providi ng a ',temporary" cul-de-sac at the louth en<l of,,Ene mal-n street is nct clear and shoul-d be shorvn-
SANITARY sEr'rEft _
WATERT4AIN.
Size of th,e tvatermain is notthe r.rain street and 6-inch on the
"E" is in excess of 5OO feet, weinternally within the develo;:ment
Huron-
DRAT}TAGE 9'OR]<S
is not shoiv-n, I>utsanitary server from
" ( be tr*ee n Lot-s 15cul-de-sacs should
in to the manhol-es -
Size of the proposed sanitary serverassumed to be B-inch- Easement for theexisting manhole to rnani:ole in strcet ',A17, BLock 3) is not shorvn. Manholcs inextended to eli_rninat.c services Circctly
and
b3 L.
Pro^oosed drainage works appear to be adequatetion that the 3o-inch di.scharge pipe at I.5% gradeincreased to 36-inch.
. CONCLUSIONS:
VJe reconmend approval of the plans subject to the itimsspecifical-Iy noted. In terms of street grades, we recommendwaiver of the 7i6 ma:<inum grade limitation in favor of the grpropcsed. The site s j-rnply does not facititate 716 maximum grand we fee.l- the proposed grades are acceptable-
shown - We recommend B-inch';n\,cul-de-sacs- Since cu].-de-sac 'suggest the watermain be looped, or looped to existing reater on
. ... :...., i.._--... ... ;.itIi.' -. i-. ^: : .- ,..: --...'-.:.- r:."'--, r-i -al, ar
-. t"
:, : ' -.ij:1_:'rvith t]- e e)<cep-
shou]-d be ..:..
ades
ades
I
tt
Riley- Purgatory Creclt Watershcd Districl
8950 COUNTY ROAD :,
EDEN PRA IR IE, MINNESOTA 5536'
The District railI require that the cvo teoporary sedimentation basins
to be l-ocated along lhe north-souch roadr,ray bc consrructed at thc
initial stages of grading operat'ions and tesrain functional during
the site grading portion of the project.
May 6, 1980
Mr. Greg Kopishke
I.lesEwood Planning and Engineering
7 415 !.Jayzata Boulevard
Uinneapolis, Ilinnesota 55426
Site Grading for the Sunrise
Beach Development: Chanhassen
Dear Mr. Kopishke 3
The Board of Uanagers of the Riley-Pur8atory Creek Watershed District
has reviewed the plans and Brading and land alteration Pertrit applicaEion
for sj.te grading for the Sunrise Beaeh Developloent in Chanhassen. The
Managers are extrerDely concerned with the steep grades on the developnenE
site and rri1l require a continuous inspection of the proposed erosion con-
trol neasures- to ensure that they are ProPerly oaintained and functional
until the altered areas on the site have been restored. To ensure that
the erosion control- rleasures are properly oai.nEained, the District r,r-ill
require that the developer post a Performance bond or letter of security
in the aoount of 920,000 prior to Ehe coumenceEent of land alteration.
llith the above noEed, the Managers approve of the gradlng and land
alteration permit for site grading on Ehis developuent subject to the
following conditlons:
Re
(
(*
1.. The Distrlct will require that all erosion conErol Eeasures, i.e.,
sraked hay bales reinforced vith snow fence, be instal.led prior to
the coxomencernent of land aLteration and be xoaintai.ned until al1
areas altered on the site have been restored. Once these erosion
conErol measures have been installed, Ehe DiscricErs engineering
advisor must be notj.fied prior to the co@lencement of land altera-
tion. Land alterat.lon cannot begin until a field inspection of
the erosion controL measures has been rnade by rhe District's
engineering advisor.
(--'--llr. Crcg Kopishke
Page 2
)lay 6, I980
Due to the allcration of steep slopes on the site and the potential
of a serlous erosion problen occurring if erosion control $easures
are not properly maintained, the developer nust post a performance
bond or letter of security in the arnount of $20,000 prior to the
conmencemenE of land alteration. This security Eust be subnitted
and approved by the Districtrs legal advisor. If needed, this
performance bond w111 enable the District to restore allered areas
or to install additional erosion control measures to protec! Ehepublic \raters of the District from areas that have not been restored.
AlI areas altered due to slte grading with the exception of the
street ri.ghts-of-way, must be restored r^rlth seed and rnulch and./or
sod within 2 weeks frou the completion of land alterarion or no
later than Seprember f, 1980.
Ihose areas altered with a slope of 3:l or greater t[ust be restoredwith sod or L,ood fiber blanket rrlthin 2 weeks frou the conpleEionof land aLteratLon or no lacer than Septetrber l, 1980,
The areas altered within the street rights-of-way must be resEoredwith seed and mul-ch and./or sod or be hard surfaced by September 15,
1980.
A detailed storD sewer plan oust be suboitted to the District for
revier., and approval. If stonntrater ls to be discharged to Lotus
Lake, an MDNR Chapter 105 Work in Public llacers peroit wilL be
reqriired.
If
contact
you have any questj.ons regarding rhe
us at 920-0655.
District I s coEments, please
Sincere v,
Ro ert
BARR EN
Engineers for the Districc
Approved by th eB ard of }{ana ge rs
RCO/ III
cc: Mr.
Mr.
EY-PURC ERSHED DISTRI CT
3
4
5
Conrad Fi. skne s s
Frederick Richards
Bob lJe ibel
Date:
Secretar
The 100-year flood elevarion of Lotus Lake is 899. The DisEricc
will require Ehat all homes to be constructed adjacent Eo the lake
have oi.nimum basetrent floor elevations 2 feet above this 100-yearflood elevation.
C. Obermeye
')
(
Riley- Purgatory Creeh Watershed Distric'
8950 COUNTY FIOAD t
EDEN PFAIRIE. MINNESOTA 5532
Ref
Ilarch 4 , l9 8I
l{r. Fran Hagen
Ilestwood Planning & Engineering
7 4L5 liayzata Boulevard
l(inneapolis, Ulnnesota 55426
PerBit ExEension Request - Sunrise Beach/
Iox Chase Developuent: Chanhassen
Dear Mr. Hagen 3
The Board of Managers of the Xl1ey-?urgatory Creek l'ratershed Dlstrict
has reviewed the revised plans and request of January 27, 1981 for an extension
of the District's grading aod land alteraEion Pereit for the Sunrise Beach/
Fox Chase DevelopmenE 1n Chanhassen. The llanagers aPProve the PerEit extension
request. until September 15, 1981 subject to the fo11ow1n8 condltj.ons:
All conditions stipulaEed in Ehe DisErlcErs original correspondence
of llay 6, 1980 remaln applieable.
the DisErlct requires that addltional eroslon control Eeasures, 1.e.,
staked hay bales relnforced lrilh snow fence, be lnstalled betlreen Ehe
proposed sedll0entaElon basin and Lotus Lake. These erosion conErol
measures nust remain in place untll 'all altered areas have been
res torcd .
A detailed storn scvrer pLan musE be submitted to the Disrrict for
revicw and approval.
<:i:'
1
2
3
4
t1\
Because of the alteration of steep slopes on lhe site and lhe PotentLal
of a serious erosion problem occurring if erosiou control measures
are not properly maintained, lhe develoPer must Post a performance
bond or letter of security ln Ehe amount of $20,000 prior to the
coEmencement of land alteration. Ttlis security mus! be subEitted
and approved by the Districtrb }egal advisor. If needed, this
perfonoance bond will enable the District to restore alt.ered areas
or to install- addlt.ional erosion control measures to protecE Ehe
public waEers of the District fron areas that. have noE been restored.
Mr, Fran IIagen
Page 2
l,ta rch 4, 1981
AI1 areas altered because of slte gradlng must be resiored wlth seed
and disced rnulch, or sod, or wood fiber blanket, or be hard surfacedwithin 2 weeks after conpletion of land aLleratlon or no later than
September f5, 198I.
A11 alrered areas r"dth a slope of 3:1 or greater Eust be restoredwith sod or wood fiber blanket withln 2 peeks after corDpletlon ofIand al tera tlon.
Ihe Dlstrict must be noti.fled 48 hours prLor to comeocenent of landalteratlon.
If you have any questions regarding the Dj.strictrs coomenls, pleasecall us at 920-0555.
5
6
_SincereIy,
- \ / ,! .t ,-'i'/'. {-t..t/ / :/,., )l? ti \... (-_-( i.rr,,]t I
Robe'r t C. otei-eylr .t /
BARR ENGINEERING CO. .
Engineers for the District
Approved by the Soard of Managers
RII,EY-PIIRGATORY CREEK WATERS DISTRlCT
C.resident
Date:J ///t/
\
("u
RCO/11r
c: Mr. Irederick Rlchards
Mr. Irederick Rahr
Mr. Don Ashworth
t
Riley- Purgatory Creek lVatershed District
agso couNw BoAo *4
EDEN PFIAIRIE. MINNESOTA 55344
June 16, 19 8l
Mr. Curt Laughinghouse
Derrick Land Company
Shelard Tower
llinneapolis, Minnesota 55427
Re: Fox Chase DevelopmenE: Chanhassen
Dear Mr. Laughinghouse:
At the June 3, 1981 Eeeting of the Rl1ey-Purgatory Creek watershed
District, Ehe Board of Managers revi.ewed both alrernates proposed for site
grading and utility installatlon for the Iox Chase Development in Chanhassen.
Previously, the Managers have reviewed and approved site Srading permits for
both of the alternates Proposed for rhis Project. The Districtrs conments
regarding the utility installaEion portlon of the projeet have been forwarded
to the Mj-nnesota Department of NaEural Resources. Regarding Lhe site grading
port.ion of the project, at the June 3 meeting' the Managers reaffirmed their
previous approval for either alternate, and this approval is subject to the
following conditions:
1. Because of the alteration of steeP sloPes on the site and the
potential of a serious erosion problem occurring if erosion
control measures are not ProPerly maintained, the develoPer must
posE a performance bond or letter of security in the amount of
$20,000 prior to comencemenE of land alteration. This securi.ty
musE be submilted and approved by the DistricEts 1ega1 advisor.
If needed, this perforrnance bond will enable the Distri.ct to
restore the areas or to lnsta11 additlonal erosion control measures
Eo protect. the pubJ-ic waters of the Dlstrict from areas that have
not been restored.
Additional eroslon conLrol measures, i.e., staked hay bales reinforced
with snow fence, must be installed beE\^,een the proposed sedioenEation
basin and Lotus Lake. These erosion control measures musE remain
in place until all altered areas have been resEored.
All areas altered because of site grading mus! be restored \^'ith
seed and disced mulch, or sod, or wood fiber blanket, or be hard
surfaced within 2 weeks after completion of land alteration or no
IaEer than September 15, 1981.
2
3
- RECAIVED
JUN r I igar
{ITY OF CHANHASSEN
l1r. Curt Laughinghouse
Page 2
June 16, 1981
A11 altered areas lrith a slope of 3:
r^rith sod or wood fiber blanket withi
land alteraEion.
r Sreater must be restored
weeks after completion of
lo
rt2
The DisEricE must be notlfied 48 hours prior to corunenceuent ofland alteration.
If you have any questions regarding the Distri.cErs comtrents, pleasecall us aE 920-0655.
S incer e1y
C. Oberneyer
c0.
Engineers for the Dis tricr
Approved by the Board of Managers
RILEY-PURGATORY CREEK WATERSIIED DISTRICT
4
RC0 /111
Mr. Frederlck Richards
Mr. Frederlck Rahr
Mr. Bill Monk
/-cC-- -2 cr t t|- - p.." id".,t
C (./tt / YDaEe:
,
t
5ui t.: -i-i9
6' l0 !'r.rncc,lv.,rrrre
i}n r'.a , |ii lr ...S(rLir
Name of App
5()u I ll
t5 t,)5
k t Li.rY- I'u Rc,\',i() i(Y cREIK UAt i:RSltC0 I)]STP,ICT
cr{AD I IC A-;t) DAlliil::o\rINc PiiRMtT
lppl ication for perrni t, pcrrnit, noti f ic.-)tion c,f cornplction
and ccrtification of co;npletIon
licant Derrick L and Company
Addrcss 1770 Shelard To\uer;l'linneapolis, t'lN 55 426 Tclephone 545-215
Narure of liork Gradinq oF a sinqfe family subdivision 27t acres
Iocarion of L'ork lrlest of and ad jacrnt to Lotus Lake
llun i c ip ality hanhassen, l'linnesotaC
Proj
Procedures To Bc Used to Control Erosion and Sedimentation SLraru bale dikes
ected Duration of tlork J months
as ne ces sary durinq construction I seed or sod as necessar f or .ermanent
cover an eros.ron con TO
If addiEional space is needed to provide the lnfornatj.on requested above, attach
the information to this application and in the space below brlefly describe the
aEtacllrnent.s.
(
o{bc)
DateAuthori zed nt
Applicant
liestvood PLanni neeltnQ Comoa&!-Y___
All r.,ork slraIl be conpleted by
na ture of collateral required
15 day of Septenben 19 80. The anount and
s2 0 000
Lhe
is
T)ris permit applicaEion is hereby
tlre lJatershed DistricE Ehis 7
tions contained 1n Ehe aEtached
(!lFni-"r/apJ,roved) by
day of May,
correspondence da red
the Board of }lanagers of
19t0, subJect to rhe condi-' 1'.980-May 7
Th is
11 ty
pernit is permissive only and does noE release the pernlEtee
Ees, Fcde Law r
froo any liabi-
loca1 ordioances -or obligation lmposed by Minnesota St
Board of flanagers
llotice
hcrcLy
of: complction of work auEhorized ;given to fhe Di:itrict on this _ dry
expirarion of gr;rd ing pernic
of ,19
1s
I'ermittee
Inspector
Pernic application received by the Watershed District on the 25 day of Februarv
19so -
7t
Ccrt.tf lcation of tlre satisf;rctory conrplerlon of uork authorlzed is llereby orde on
tlris _ day of _, 79-. :
STATE OTh0h0trs@TA
BOX 32 CENTENNIAI. oFFIcE BUILDING ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55155
!3X llBl
DNR INFORMATION
(612) 296.6r57 F .E NO.__
July 13, 1981
Mr. Roger Derri ck
Demi ck Land Company
1770 Shel ard Tower
Minneapolis, MN 55426
PERMIT APPLICATION 81-6236, FOX CHASE DEVELOPMENT, LOTUS LAKE (#10-6), CARVER CO.
Dear Mr. Derri ck:
Attached is your permit to construct the storm water holding basin andappurtenant h,orks. PIease .note the special provisions of tfie permit.The pennittee is encouraged to minimiie distirrbance of rype ir'weiianasas much as possible duriig the construction-of-in" notai"nb-oaiini. - --
Also, it is my understanding there is some concern over the road ament; however, we would encourage the alignment that would result'I eas t amount of disturbance.
I i gn-
i n the
If you should have further-questions pertain.ing to this matter, pleasecontact Ms, Judy Davidson for assistance at 6ll/Zg6-l5li.
Sincerely,
SION OF ERS
ames F. Cooper,in i strator
Water Devel opment Secti on
J FCIJD: skcc: USCE: Carver Co. St,lCD: Ri I ey-Purgatory Creek l,lSD: City of Chanhassen: Bea Ransfer, C.0.: Lotus Lake file: St. Paul l^laters: Georgette Sosin
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAT RESOURCES
w 70.50
STATE OF MI NNESOTA
DEPABTMENT OF NATURAL E ESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATERS, SOILS ANO IIINERALS
Centenoial Ollice Building, St. Paul, Minnesora, 55101
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF DERRICK LAND COMPANY
lor. PERMIT TO CBANGE THE COURSE, CUR R€NT, OF CROSS SECT ION o, LoXus Lake (#70-6)
Carver county'
PERMIT
lS H EB EBY GRANT ED to Derrick Land com
communications pertarnrng to this p ermit is 1770 Shalard Tower
P.A.No.81-6236
Pursuant to Minna:ota Statutes, ChJpter 105, antj on the basis ol statemenls and
l?lt!rr, maps, and plans submirre'l by lhe appliconr, and olher supporting ddrd, alt of yJhrlh
rnlormalion contained in the perm'i apolication.
arE made a part hereof by referenre. PERMISSION
whose address lor the purposeol r.rrcer and orher
which addre5s is sublect to change by ylritten
hotice trom the permitleo
To
MinneapoTis, Minnesota 554 26
consttuct diked sed.inent and debris basin. storn sewer ouxfall and sanitarg
sewer, alJ. as indjcated in application received Mag 7, lg?7, and gradinq and
erosjon controT pTans and sediment design received Julg 6, 198J. AIJ ltork
sha77 be done in accordance with the Specjal provisions bejow.
PROPERTY OESCRIBEDsST Covetnment Lots 5 and 6; W\ of NW4t Section 7, ?7f6N, R23ll
,or th. purposs ot stotnwater managemenX.Carver COUNTY
Thir p.rmit is grahredsubiect ro rhe following G E NE FIAL and SPECIAL PROVISTONS
G EN ERAL PHOVISIONS
This petmii i. permissive only and shall not release the permirlee from any liat,ility or obligatioo imposed by lv!innesota S:arures, Fede.at
Law or locll ordinances relaling thereto and shall remain in force !ubiect lo 6ll conditiont and limitations now or her€ah€r ;mposad by
lan,,
Thit permil 13 not r$ignablE except wirh iho writren consent ol the Commissioner ot Natural Resources.
Tha Oircclot of the Divaaion o, Walers. Soils and Minerals shall be oorilied at lear! live days in advance of the commeocemenr of rhe
wo.k .uthoriz€d hereunder and shall be notitied ol its compl0tion rrirhin live days therealter. The notice ol perm,r irsued by the
Commiaaione, lhall be kept securely posted io a conspicuous place at th€ 5ite of operations.
No changa lhall be mede, without written permission previously obtained ,rom the Commissioner of N ural Resourcer. in the hydrsutic
dimenlioni, aapaaity or location of any iremr ot wo.k surhorized hereund€r.
Tha parmilloo thall gra6l sccess to the site at all reasonabte rimes during and alter conslauction to authorized rcprcsenlative3 ot tha
Commilsionar ol Nstural R6ourcei lor inspection of the work authorized hereunder
Thia Pormir maY ba larminated by the Commissioner of Natural Rs.ourc6. u/ithout notice, at any aime h6 deemr it nacers..y tor the
consa ation of th! waler aetou/ces of the state. or in the intereat ot public health and weltare, or aor violation o, tny of the proviioni
o, lhi. paririt, unl6ra olherrris€ provided in the Special Provision!.
I
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
SPECIAL PROVISIONS
l. Conatruclion work .uthorized unde. this parmit shatt b0 comploted on or betor.June 30 7982
wtilt6o ,oqua3t to tha Comtni35ionea by the Permitise, stating rho resron therrforo, an ertention of timg mty ba obtainod-
ll. Thr lrcavstion or soil authorized herein shall oot be conatrued to inctud6 rh€ romovat ot orge n;" -31se. DOES NOT APPLY
unless tho srea ,rom which tuch organic metter i3
.rmovad it impswious or ir a€alod by the application of benlonit6 oftoa ?xcavation
. Upon
t ln all ca!€! whora tho doing by lhe permitl€g ot anything aurhorizodbV this permit lhallinvolv6 tho ta king, using,ordamagi.g ofany propelty
tiohtt or int€resl3 o, ony other person or pcrsons, or ol any publicly o!,vned lands or improvements lhereon or interests therain, the
p€rmrtacc. b6lors proceeding therewith, shall obtain the written consent ol all persons, ag€ncies, or authoriti?s concerned, and rhatl
lcquire all properly, aightr and interesrs necessary therefor.
This permir it permassiveonly. No liabilityshall be impos€d upon or incurrcd by lhe Stare of Minnesotaoi any of itsofficers,,geots or employe€s,orficrally q, personally, on accouari ct rhe granting hereof or on account ol any c,amage to any person or prope-ny resulting fiomany aal oI omission ol the permittee or any ol ils agen(s, ernployees, or conaraclors relating lo any matter hereunder. This permit shallnol be construed as .stopping or limiling any legal claims or right ol action ot any person oiher than the state against rhe permr ee, ilslgents, amployes, or contractors, for any darialc or rniurv resulting irom any such acr or omission, or as estopping or tioitrng any tegatclaim or 'lght ol action ot lhe state against the permrltee, its agents, employees, or cont.actors fo, violation oior tiiltrrc to compty wittrlh! provisionr ot !h. permit or applicable provisions o, law.
No marorial6xcavated by aolhorrtv ot this permil.
porlron ol thr bed of said walers which lies below
nor rrralerial lrom any other source. axcept as specified heiein shall be
al tha sita ol thc wo.k ,or the purpde of complyrng w
It shall bc the duty ol the permittee to determine correctly all p€.tinent alevationiirh rhe condition. o, lhii permia. :
Any exlension o, rha 5urlace o, 5aid watDrs tes\rllrng f.om work .uthori.ed by rhi3 permir shall become public warersand te,t open.ndrrnob6lructrd for ujs by the public. ..
lover)
SPEGIAL PROVISIONS
v Rlccapr is hlrehv acknowledg€ ot S DOES NO? AppLy arpayment for .ubrc yardsot scno, gralet
07 rock aod cubic ya.(l! ol muck an(l $ll. riru listin|3ted a.nouot ot maler'al to b€ .F.novryl hsrc0,.q!.
computed al thc rate of ten cenl! per cut ic ya.d tor sand and gravel and two cenr! per cubic yard lor ,nuck and srlt
Pelmitt€e agreet by acaoptance ol lhis peimil ai rhown by commencerflent o, work suthoriaed heaeundor to pay, by certrtred check, bank or
postrl money orde.. .nade payable to rha Stal! Trca5urar and delve{e(l to the Or.ecror, Oiv.rion ot Waters. So;t' and Minerats. Oopartment olN.lural Rcsource3, Ccntennral Ollice Bu 'ldrng. Sl Pau l, [tannasorJ 551Ol, lor ariy mar€rial ren]oved from !he bed of DUbtic war',,rs in e, c€ei o,
thai so etrimated, at the above rale withrn thraly (lrvs att!., conrplerion o, the woTk aurho ?ed iereunder.
VIII. Design and consxruction of the diked sediraent and de.bris basjn
accordance with the requirenents of the Carvet Countg Soij andDistricX.
OATED AT ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA, THIS
sha7l be in
?later Conservation
/3
Gtasses in the odrgt, sedinent and debris ,basin sha"ll .be left in a no-cut, no-nawcondition in order to retard fTow of nutxients and sedinents from the basiD-
x. rhe ditch shown fron t&e outer edge of xhe diked sediment and debris basin tothe open waxer of Lotus Lake shaTl be zeduced to a 3ot length so that vegexationadjacent to xlle l-ake can caxch arg excess sediment resuTting fron the dischargcfron the dixch.
SEE ATTACHED SPECIAL PROVISTONS
i:uscoE
Carvet Countg SWCD
RiTey-PurgaXorq Creek WSD
- Cixg of Chanhassen
Bea Ransfet. C.O.St. Pau.L ry'aters
- Lotus Lake fiTe
Georgette Sosin
DAY OF
.t "9/
s F" Coopex,
DeveTopnent
Adninis
Water Section
ator
IX.
T,/ORK TU TI|E BEDS OF PUBLTC
'IATE
R5
-xJv-
Permittee sha77 notifg the regLonaT
officeE R62 D,^ -F^-
Xo con nence auXhorized work-
?':e use of expTosives in an? of the ,raters of the state ls ptohibixed un-Less tre'Ioca.l state consewatLon officer is notiffed thereof at .zeast 4g houts Ln advar,e -of tlre tine tl:e woEk is to .be dore- (M.5. Section lll-42, Sunalvi'sji U)
Befote constzuction and after conprexion of the project authotized. petmixteesha-Ir .supprg the. regiona-r. hgdtorogist Htxh photographs of t}:e projZix area.
Spolr hateria2 slar-I no| he placed on t}e .beds of pubric araters, attl whetevetpossLble, suclr materia: slou]d rot he placeit aagwhete wixhin arZas subject toilooding-. rn tJ,e event spoi.L rmrst be praced within frood pra:,n ar.i, Decauseareas free tton f7,,iling are Dot readirg avaiTabTe. tne s9i;t snoiii ne placeapa,aTTer to tlre directl on of f,l*,d tio* and/ot spreait ovJr a latge area so asto m!'nlnize ang possibre o.bstruction xo trre passage of flood r*at!rs.
SPECTAL PROVTSIONS
(OnIg t}e num.bered Specjal proyjsjons appTy to Ais perniX)
ri'e pernittee sDa.Ir conp-lg pit} ar..?, tures, tegurations, requitenenxs. or standaadrof tlre lJinnesota po:rution contro-L Agenca and othu, uppli"rll" feder'at, state. or:Jocal agencies.
t! ture rnaintenance excavaxLon of this project shalt not exceed the dinensionsIereln authotLzeil. Priot to connencing ang ntaintenance excavatl.on. pemitteeaha-zl advl66 tlre ,epart flen x of Natuzal gesources of the voTwne ot niterial abe teaoved, the manner ot tenoval, and t}re spoil disposa I slxe(s) iiipor.a.rf t,le conunTssioner of llatura.l. Resources determines *at a fieid iisiectionls necessarg prio! to approving suclr mailtenance wotk, xhe petnixtei siE,rlauDralt a cbeck pagabTe to tire state laeasarer to covet tl:e ictuar cost of theI'nspectl'on, ot s25.00, tthichevet is gueaxet, pursuant to lllnnesota Regarations6 llcAR t l.50oo, Paragraph a. Mainxenance excavatJon shail not be conmenceclunti: perrnittee rs recejpt of the DepatXnenX, s approvaT.
ThLs petnlx iloes nox obvLaxe aag regu.lrernen x tot fedetal assent tron the lt.s.CoEps ot Engineezs, I27O U.S. post Off,jce ani! C.rstr,m gouse? St. pau.Z,, lIr.I SSlOl,.
?errnjtt€e o}atl, seed arr slde stopes riich contribute d&ec-t su,iface ruD,otf , a6tE!p of lanit abuxtlng Dot} sjdes of tl:e iH1dr,h to petnanenx grasses anit leganes,these strlp.s xo be one garil ln erLilth ot to tI16 top ot the spoil baak, whichevetta greatet.
Ang otganlc ,flaterla.Is oE nud wave that nag be tal.sed ot pushed up a.bo"e tl,eexrsting 7a*ebed as a lesu.lt of gEade fl,ll placetnent ahazl be renoved. to t}Jesatisfaction of the DepaEtnent of l\ratural .Resources,
PERi4IT NO- Bt_6)36
DA?E ,u lq lo, 19gj
hgd-zoTogisX aX 296-752i. and. consezvation
ax --laa-<,zcz -' 48 houts ptior to intent
X ITI.
Permlttee -snaL7 nititg the regional hgdrologisl lniediaxelg upon conpTexion ofauthotizeil voIk so that a finaT iaspection can .be conduc_ted.
I,then votk Ls pertorneil bg conttact, the pernittee shaj.j; pEior xo connencenent.of tork. notifg xhe regional hgdroTogist, in wzixlag, the r,ame of the contractol.tle address, phone nunbet and ptojecX forenan tor the'broject.
.. SEE t.tEvl:lli5i, SIDI IOit ADDITIOIAL ffiOVISIONS
-_-x.r--
XII.
YVTT.
xvrr r -
Perriittee shall prep.:re oz requite the conXxacXor to prepate a conptehensiveerosion and sedinent control pTan addressiltg construcxion and. final gL.)de
stabiLization to prevent erosion and sedinenxation inxo pubjic wateEs. suchpTan sha77 incTude, but not be Tinited to bale dikings, tenporarg pond;ng,
temporary and/or permanenx sodding, seeding, nuTching, and netting " Sucrl
pJ.an shal.l be conpTeted prior to conrnencenent of authorized work and sub-nixted to the regional hgdtoTogist for incTusion in pernit fi7e.
Pernittee sita-l-l ensure tiat the contractor has .recejsed and thorougltlg
understands all conditions of this permit.
Pernixxee and conttactor are herebg advised xhat ang violation of the aonditionsof tlis permit constitute a misderneanor, punishabTe bg a fine of gSOO"oO and/or
90 ilags in jai7.
A77 exposed soi-l resuitjng from the auxhorized acxivitg shall. etithin 4g hoursot conpTexion of such wotk, be seeded Hith a nixture of perennial and annualglasses and then rnul.ched with stzaw or simiTar nulch" ?he use of sod as erosion
proXecXion wi77 preclude the ,eed for seeding and nalching pzovided the sod js
insXaTLed brithin the alotted tine period and is stai(ed on slopes steeper thanfour feeX horizontal distance per everg one foot of verXicaj tise.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
County Office Building, llaconia, IUinnesota 5r3BT
June 18, 1981
Mr. Tom Hani.Iton, Mayor
City of Ctranhassen
690 Coutter Drive, P. O. Box 1l+7
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
Dear Mayor H8nli]-ton
I L,as requested. to lrrite you this 1etter by Bill l4onk, Dennis Marhula
and Kurt Laughinghouse during a conference ve had yesteraay, 6/t(/Bt,on "Fox Chase" soil erosion and sed.iment control problens.
The Soil Conservation Service, vorking in the publie interest throughthe Carver Soil and Water Conservation District, does not have B.pprovalor disapproval authority for soil conservation practices that the cityof Chanhassen nay require for lend use developnent plans.
We do, hovever, inventory, evaluate and reviev land use plans and nake
recommendations on general soil conditions, soil erosion hazard.s, sedi-
ment tleLivery and. vater quaLity problems, etc. He can also assist thecity lrith pls.nning and zoning ordinances s.nd. soi]- and water conseryatio!practice standards and specifications to be used. by the eity durin€i land
development. All requests to the district are to be made in r.rriting an<l
addressed to: Larry Johnson, Chairnan, Carver Soil & I^Iater ConservationDistrict, County office Building, Waconia, Minnesota 55387,
If you have any questions, please feel free to ca.11 me at l+l+Z-2511+ t,e-
tween 7:00 A,M. snd L:30 P.M.
Sincerely,
Donald C. Berg
District Conse rva ionist
cc: Bi]1 Monk - Director of Public Notks y'
Kurt Laughinghouse
Dennis Marhula
Larry Johnson - Carver S&WCD
Alfred Fischer - SCS Area Conservationist
_ l:rstin Jeffery - SCS Area EngineerRECEIVFN
JUN I I 1991
{ITY OF CHANHASSEN
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
IIr. Tom Hanilton, I'tayorCity of Chanhas s en
690 Coulter Drive, P. 0. Box 147
Chanhassen, Minnesota 553I7
Dear lvlayor Hani l ton ,
There is sti1l some question as to our approval authorityfor erosion control and sedirnent delivery- to Lotus Lake '
during the development of Fox Chase.
1 Nlark has inforned rne that the design of the sedinentdebris basin will have to neet SCS itandards andcifications.
Justin Jeffery, the SCS area engineer, rvi11 review thelVestrr-ood Engineering sediment basin design to see thatit does neet these specifications and/or-keep the cityinformed as to problems and progress.
The placement and use of the sediment basin in or nearthe wetland adjacent to Lotus Lake will require permits
f rom the U. S. Corps of Engineers and the ltiinnes'ota DNRprior to approval.
233 South Olive
l{aconi a, }'linnesota 5S387
Donald C. BergDistrict Cons er
June 25, 1981
Bi1
and
spe
cc:
io n St
Bill }Jonk - Director of Public lgorksKurt.Laughinghouse
Dennis l,larhul aLarry Johnson - Carver SQltrCDAlfred Fischer - SCS Area ConservationistJustin Jeffery - SCS Area EngineerIile
't
Sincerely,
_1
United States
Oepartment of
Agriculture
Soil
Conservatioo
Service
Roon 301 , Ear Ie 8ro*n Torer
5120 tbrLe lircHn Drlve
Erooti Iyn Centen, ill. 5!1410
To:
EIG{ox-CtBse Developrenb
lrroslorr Corrtrol PIan, Carver CouDby, iltrllii.
Dou BerE, DlsLrlci Corlservatlonlat
CoanLy 0ffice tsulldlrg
233 SouLh Ollve Streel 553ti7
As requested I revielred bhe attached subJeBt plan yesterday wlth t(r. Harhula
ard lf. I.hr6hlngtruse for cospllance slLh So11 ConservaLlon Servlce
design starliards.
SediEenU basin 1 is proposed to be corlstructed prlor to any Bradi.ng.
As the neln road ls constructed sedlr€nt basins 2 ald 3 are to be
oevelopec.
A diversion ls prloposed at area 4 to divert runoff from the road between
Locati-orB 4 ard 5 rDLo the low area at locallon 4. The outfloH fron
area 4 is to be conlrolled by sooe type of slructure. Straw bales are
roL recor rerded as an outleL sbructure. Area 4 13 apparentLy deslgned to
reuuce peak dr,acharEes Lo Lhe Braded area downgtrean, not necessarlly as
a seolrEnt basl,n.
'Ihe di,version at area 7 ls proposed to reduce fIoH over the graded
poruions of the siLe.
The C uru;lrBham Pono at locatLon 5 hag been proposed a3 a nethod of
conLrolliru runoff over Lhe Jraded sectiona d@rnhiu. fl rray be
rEcesstarv Lo l,Jwer this pond probably by pumpin8 to provide adequaLe
si:oraSe. ( IL Bhould be rpled LhaL Lhls pond iqy b€cor,e a hazard Hhen
horires arre consLrucLed luiedlately dourrstrean. )
o Tho Soll ConsorvEtlon S€rvica
l! rn ao5;:cy ol lho
Ocpirtfienl ol Agrlcultur€
scs-As-l
10-79
/-, \
@)
Subject:
- From: Ju:lEin Jel'fery, F€ Englrner
6120 Ear1e tsrosn Drlve
ljrooklyD CenLer, l,{li 55430
o",". July 2, 19!.7
AccordlrB to the co(puLations reviewed there 1s sufflcient storage
pl,aBred Lo sLore t,he entlre runoff froh the 1C0 year- 24 hour sLorn.
Itovided outflob, froxr baslns 1, 2 ard 3 can be adequately conErolled to
provide sufficient detention lloe to al low waterborrre sediren! !o
seLlle out, ihe baslc corcep I appears salisfacLory. I will be r.qeeLir8
wilh lir. I4arhula on JuIy 6, 19Bl to revlew the outflow proposals.
Deperxllnd on available storage aL the siLe, lt rnay be necessary to rerriove
seoinien! periodically fro!, proposed sedimenL basin It2 atfi 3, The poinl
aL whlch LhlB 1s requlned needs to be speclfiea.
The area at location 5 could be subJecL to sufficlenL crosion tc cau3o
6ul,Iy advarrce on the adjacent property. Wlth the sedir€nL baaj.ns ln
place Lhis erosion should rDL Icave the site for the deslgh conCitlons,
buL is of concenn Lo the devel,oper boLh Drorfl a relatlons standpoj.nL and
lhe cos! of repair. Therc ls Ehe possibillty thaL a siorn, sewer inlet
could be lrretalled in the area 5 location whlch woul,d ac! Lo control
guLly advance, although I donrt belleve a flnal decislorr has been rade
ofl Lhis yet.
Arcas rDt graded are proposed go renEln vegetated in the exlstlng condltlon.
sLraw bales ar€ proposed to assis! in vegetailon establishnrenL afier
trading is cc,npleLed. IL ls proposed thaL they will renein ln place
unLll veEetation 1s establlshed. SedlBrenU ba:rln 1 ls propoaed Lo be
permanenE.
Easerenls for the pond a! IocaEion 4 on the adJacent property and Lhe
conslruclion problems Lhat could occur due to pondlng at }ocationg
2 ard 3 were not discussed.
You nuy havc sor€ commenLs to add, but basically Lhe concept arrd data
reviewed Lo date appears to lEet or exceed SolI Congervatlon Service
desj.gn standarcis.
Please see tilat Mr. LauEhlrghouse, Mr. !4arhula, Judy Davidson of DNR lt@
Mr. r{cnk r€caave our comuEnta e! soon aa possible.
JuoLln Jeff'ery
Area E rrijl neer
\./
N\cJ
\\\WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY
July 9, 1981
RE: Fox Chase
Mr. l,lilliam [,lonk, P.Et)ity of Chanhassen
690 C aul Lo Drive
Chanhassen, 14N 55311
ty'e are herein submitting the final details and design computa-tions for the sedimen ta ti on erosion control on the ibove project.I have met severaf ti.mes vith 14r. Justin Jeffery, Area Engineer,Soil Conservation Service; and bet i eve that it has been a!reedthat the final design meets or exceeds the S.C.S. standards f orerosi on,/sedimen ta ti on control.
Dear Mr. Monk:
Item I
I tem I I
I tem IV
The Follouing is a follou-up to Mr. Jefferyts1981, a copy of ruhich is atLached.
We reconfirm that all runoff from a 24 hour, 100year event can be stored on-site ryith no discharge(8.11 aelft runoff v.s. 12.4 ac/fl storage). Ata meeting on 5 July 1981 vith llr. Jeffery, ruerevieued the sedimentation ou tle t design. Thedesign vas based upon the S.C.S. recommended 5day dravdoun. The final details and calculationsfor the outlets are attached.
memo ofl 2 July
The Developer concurs that sedimentation basin I\uill be constructed prior to the site gradingoperation, and basins 2 and 3 rLrill f olloru as g ra-ding progresses to such a stage that lhey can beconstruct.ed.
The lov area at location 4 is not includedstorage calculations, but. is available topeak discharges during and subsequent to tgrading.
1n
reduce
he site
The diversion is intended torunoff from ofisite draining
areas of the site.
reduee the amount of
through the graded
_ RECE T\/Ft?
JUL 1 s rg8r
-CITY OF CHANHASSii(
,a15 WAYZATA EOUt-EVARD. MtNNEAPOL|S, MtNNESOTA 55a26 {a12) SadO!55
I tem III
t
I tem V The 0runer is pursuj.ng the recommendation thatthe Cunningham Pond be .louered to alLoru for tem-porary storage oi runoff from that area.
The design uas based upon the sedimentation qen-eration for the highest 30 day period based uponS.C.S. data. If it appears that sedimentation
accumu lation is exceeding the design, the pondsviII be cleaned out periodi cal ly to accommodatethe design storm (24 hou r - lti0 year ) .
I tem VI
Item \iII It is proposed to stop the site grading a minimumof 100 Feet from the property to minimize theprobability of that occuring; and, as noted in
Lhe memo, storm seuer vll I be extended to thisarea as soon as practical.
I tem VIII- The Developer concurs.
I Lem I X The Developer concurs.
This ruas discussed at the 5 July 1981 meetingvith Mr. Jeffery and it is agreed that any ease-ment/permits/etc. necessary ruould be acquiredprior to using this area as a ponding area. Again,this pond is not needed for the overall erosioncontrol system.
I trust that ruith the information transmitted thatCouncil requirement of S.C.S. revieu and approvalaccomplished. Ifl you have any Further questions,
recommendations, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
I,,E NG&IN ER ING COMPANY
the City
vi ll have
comments,
been
or
D e flarhula,
DM: dg
cc: Don Berg, S.C.S,Justin Jeffery, S.C.S.
Tim Fe11, Corps of EngineersJ. Davidson, D.N.R.K. Laughinghouse
LAND
Mr. tJiIliam l.,lonk, P.July 9, 198I
Page 2
I tem X
AP?LICAIION FOR A DPARITiENI Of IHE AEIIY PERUII
ior u.. ot thi.lorm. ro. F t 1t15-2-l
llt. D'D}!i|-rt ol-lh. &ttrY !.7rnit lroetrri -i. rrrrprir.d h t ction to ol rn. i,y.r -d H-br Acr of t!93. tctio.i a{N ol?' L' t2-5o0 -rd Lct.o.r lo3 ol ?. L. t2-63:1. thorc lrrvr'roqutr; p;,rt !!tlo'iri^c lrucorr.. r'; ;rt i" o. .t{.crirE n.vig.bt.r.t.r. ol llh. Uoilo., tlrl... ti. di.ci'.rg. ol dr.dgod o. till n.r.ri;t irrto rncrr ol d; Unit.d si.i.;, ;J;. rr-r+orr.tr.a of(t.(hrd mal.ri.l ior lta p.rrrpoa. ol dr.rF;ng {t t^l;oca.n w.r.r.. lntonrt.tron Drovid.d in f$lc Form .a3f5 -,tt Uc uEO in avatrr.tingti. Fplicllion lor t D.nnit. lnto?ftnion in th. +rptic.tion ir mcde r mrrtcr oip"tr,i ,.-iJ ir*rO-,iirr,r-,". o, . pu51ic m,*_.Dr'clo&rt ol lf inlont.l;on iaqrcal.d la roluntiry; rrowcvrr, nrc airi raqrr.rira6.rc n.ccaa.ry ih oral.r ro e{rni,"rcrta with th.tsplicrnl trd to.v.lu.t. th. p6rmir eptac.tron, li nrccrsery intorh.rron ir rrcr prrv;aco, tfo lr.iii +pll""ri_ c_nor b. pro_castad rlor c- , pcrhit bG iaauad.
o'c fcl ol otig'|'rr' a,'.w'ngt or 900d rrgro&c'blo copi.r ra;ajt .,how tir-locat,on bd atrrr.crat ol thc proporad acrivrty hu.rb' ltlDctrcd to l''ia gpl'|catioh (tc. ainpl. tk.wi^gs r!d anrcttiarl -rd bc.a.rtihrnrd r" rtr" o,.ri,.i l"'g,"ir hrvrng iuri.drcraonoe.r lh. locttion ol tfi6 pr6963s6 .ctavrty. An rppi,crt,on thrr ia not conpt.rrd in futl iilt Uc trt -.O." --
?
L Appl)cr!'on nunrbcr (to .ss'gh.d by Corpsl 2. Datc
10 June 7987
Dar
a, N6-. tnd tddrcss ol lpttrcrrlt.
Derrick L and CompanyI770 Shel ard lou,er
lli nneapol i s, llN 55A?6
l.l"f,hone no. during businrss hours
\Lt6-7'7(,^./c 6 ) 2t
^/c | |
!ct,vrty, ,ls purpoae rnd r,lrendrd u5e lnt,vete. pubt,c. coh6e,crEt or ol,r.rl ,hct,rd,ng d.sorp_6ny to br araclad On trtts, or p!le or ltost- StrpFro ed ptarlorhs. tt!? typc. Co_!,rsrt,on rrdrDrgcd ot dump.d.nd heans ot convlys^ce. and rhe sourc€ ot d,schar;€ o, Lrt hat.r,rt. llEloct 1a.
l- jll is to be placed in part oI a lype IIof a hous I ng subdivision jncluding roads,
6
5, Nbme, Bdd.as3 and t,rt6 ol Eutho,,rfd tgcnl.
O?sclrbf tn de!R,l tha p,oposed
l.on ol ihr typa ol tthrctures. tl
quontrl,t ol 'lat.?r!ls to ba d!5ct
lddrtronal spsc€ rs n.cd?d, usc
uetland for the corr:tructionutilities, ar,d houses,
A.,C I )
a/c I l
7. Nanlas. add,csse! D^d telephone numhars ol rdtornrnlt flroDertt oh"rs. lrss:?s
City of Chanhassen
75I0 L aredo Drive
Chanhassen, ['lN >5317
(6)Z) 47 4 -8A85
etc.. *lrose prop?rly rr!a sJlorns rhe ,er?rway,
tlD No.
l
S.r,
SIJ l/4 ol
Section,
Subd, v. No.
t lre N
Carver
Slra!1, road or othar d.scrrptrva locatron
Coenty St rr.Z'p Coae
far Art.3$rr Oascriptro.r: llt lnoErl
8. localion rt\cr. proporcd tdivity arrsts or iill ocqrr.
Add..aa:
ENG Fotm l3it5, 1 OCI 77 Edition ol t Apr ra tt ob.ot.r..
Ielephone ho. during bus,na5! hours
'iiiN;:
23
Rg€.
l,/2 of above
County, l'1N
ln or n€ar crty or to lwr
9. Ntr. of w.tc,Bry !t location ol thr acrrv,ty,
L otus Lake
Ju
10. oata .ctrvily ia proflor.d to coirn.nca,
lr a.y portron ol tha sctivily to, *hiafi ruthoriaEtion ra lought now co.nr,lct.,l, tr3ri6r rs "Yc!.'9rva raason! in tha r€rnarl toctront Month a.,d yoe, mc ac
ll.YEs [] *o
t compl6tcd
14inn. DNR FiIl & drainCity of Chan- preliminary
hassenRiley Pu rga - Crading
t ory Creek
lddrtrficatidr No.Oetc ot Application Oat. ol Approvst
Lr!t all approvdla or ccTtrticatro.r3 rcquircd by oth.. lodarat.lron, dischargs!, dcAositr or othar Ectivrria, dolcrib.d i-.ld;i! appl
tal6, srata Or local agencros lo. &iy Strvctures, constatrc_icatron.
age
platting
Hay 6, 1980
ApriI 27, lggIJuIy 2I, I98 0
. tha sctiviry describGd herein or lor any acrivity direc y retated to th. ac!,vrry
x
't 3.
{lt "Ycs" explain in r€marksl
Hat any agency danr6d +provEl to
d.rcrrb6d h...'n)
14. S.marks or addiiionsl inloinarion,
See en c I osed Environmental Assessmen ti.ts former name, Sunrise Beaeh
p repa red for the proj ec t under
Project has had preliminaryPurgatory l,/a te rshed DistrictResources.
City of Chanhassen, t? iley
De pa r tmen t of Natural
AOplr-cerron i! hcrcby mada fo, a p€irnit or parrnrt3 towrln th. IntoTharron conta,6cd rn thrs +|Pticatio6, ,!coatplct.. and sccr..r.. I i".*rc, c.nifi'tf,ai i eos;
4,oA,a-l"on\AJ - p^.c-fro.^erl hr6 lJ-.-.^^,1-
\"j,.l-f r^- d.o.roc.
approvaJ.s From
and Minnesota
and bels9 tha aJ ority to und thr propos€d
gn!tura ot Applicett or Au lho.i cd Agcol
aJthorize th€ acriv;ti!S d63cribcd h 6r6in. I cenafy that t xn ,an,tia,d that to..th. b€sr ot m
r)
:)t"
3)
Ah.t
15.
rtl such Inrorrhdrion rs rrua.6Tiv't,c!.
rh' 4rplrcatian tr',tt ba siga.d b'v tha cDricanr; how.va?, it moy b. srgncd by a duly aJthoiir.d 6gcnt ln'n.d rn rrin sll}""J",T"i,::.ffiil]:i#f'"?;'w;';;";;;:"lL?,io ,n" "e-'t *'i "e,i.,nlio-i,,?,
ji-u*n ."*.",,
18 U. S, C. S.ctio.r lOOt D,ovid.! rh.i: -Who.v.i, in ,ty ,tremrr within th. juTrrdtction ol iry d.gDr!n..rt or locncyol lh' unit'd s'rt" knowrnslv 6d wjlltully rrrririi.. lo,tl".i",;;';'r*. r.p by ..ry r.rd, sdlcnc, o. d.v,c. . met..iar r.cro? ,n'k" .,y r'rtr' trcriridr' o' r"u.tl'r6r sr!trn;; ;;;;;;;;;. o. n,.a..r o. u..r av rirr. *,iring o, (bdrn.nr,H;:l*ffi,,'.-?Hl ?J.t::".:,,,*,1i",,. o. r,r,J,iliIfl-i,'LI -,.v, th., b. rin.d iEr ,rDi. rhi, .10.m{, ortc. Ein b. r!r..t].d r*r, . o;r, i'.Y.fI: oo r.r s-d r pmit sxocrsrins leo witrr rhir +iiiliir..l'n. rpp,opri"r.
Oata activiry ia arprctad io ba cqtI,latad
lasurng Ag6ncy lyp. Alp.oval
!
6i..[[ efuo
+ P^osr6--' c{1r$.o{. PArt ^ d.ilid l-).s-80
.&^^x.t* tDq.?el p[,.-". AdLct ts-Zo-9l
.-
United States l)e;rartnrent of the Intcrior
FlSll ANI) \l'lt.D t-ll:I SIIR\/l('l;
St. Paul Field Office, Ecological Services
538 Federal Euilding and U,S. Courl House
316 Norlh Robert St re et
St. Pau l, Minnssota 55'lO1
Juty 7, 19 81
Members of Clly Councl]
City of Chanhassen
76 10 Laredo Drlve
Chanhassen, Mlnnesota 55317
Dear Councilmenbers:
The U.S. Fish and l{ltdllfe Servlce has been approached by the Lotus
Lake Homeowner I s Assoclatlon and the Hest Pleasant vlew Road Assoclalion
concerning proposed construction activlties and thelr efFects on weLlands
associaLed with Lotus Lake and the lakers water qualiby. The two cltizensl
groups were particuLarly concerned with:
Derrick Land Companyrs proposed houslng development and lhe
associaled placement of a sedlmentation basln ln iretlands,
Lotus Lake Eslatesr houslng congtrucLion, ln and adJacenb
to wetlands, and
the cltyrs proposed park developEent wiih lake access conslructed
ihrough a wetland, and dredgln8 ln Lobus Lake.
The two neighborhood assoclations have requested thaL we provide you
wilh our asaessment of the iEpacts of these and siEilar proposals to
Iocal fish and wildlife resources. That assessnent follows.
The effect of these projects, and others, on wetlands and Lotus Lake's
water quatlLy would be varlable, and would depend on the extent of each
proJectrs disruptlon of exlsLlng land featunes. The greater the dlsLurbance
to the exlsLing natural areas, the greater the posslbill.ty of adverse
environnental effects on Lotus Lake and its assoclaied wetlands.
The lretlands oF concern ln the proposed proJect areas are dooj.nated
by sedges, ruahes, cattall, reed canarygrass, wiJ.Iows and submergenu
on floallng-Ieaved aquatic plants such as pondweed, duckweed, watenlilies'
and bhe Amerlcan loLus. These areas were fornerly referred Lo as Type
2, 3, and 4 wetlands. The wetlands assoclated wiLh the northern end
of Lobus Lake are Lhe last of the wetlands adJacenl to the lake that
have not been drained or fllIed. They provlde fon floodwater storage'
RECE!VED
* JUL-91981
;ITY OF CHANHASSEN
-
TN EI.PI Y NE;LI' IO:
2
fi1lration of nutrients and sediment from runoff and provide breeding,feedlng, and restlng habiLat for water fiit, -"""Sut"0",
and furbeaners.They also provide spawning areas for ft"n ip"oi3" residenL in LotusLake. Lot,us Lake itsetf contripyt"" g"".tii-ii-crr" biorogicar produc_tivi'ty' recreational and aesrhelic q";itv-lni-:.and values of rhe area.
Data are avairable whlch docunent the values or Lotus Lake and its assocl-ated. $retrands. Reports containlng tne"e J.ia-ieconmend how cerLainconstructlon activlt,les can_proceed adJacent to the lake without desbroylngthe arears naturar varues. Ti:ese aata ;;; ;;";il;;.;1;;"-;;;-;; ;;;;;",in the l
riIIE
ill:;"n'u"t"'' survev bv De}I Hosen of rnsrru-
2. Report by the Chanhassen Lake Study Co&&ittee,
3. March 4, 1981, R j.Iey-pur.gatory Creek Watershed Dlstrict Reporl,and the
4. June 13, l98O,-InvenLory and Survey by Carver Soil and WaterConservation Dlstriot -
This
-
ln fornati.on glves support to the varue of a cooprehensive plan
lT 9..y!t and DevelopEent siEitar to ttre one under developDenl by theCibyrs Planning CoEmlssion. The premlses of ttre proposed plan are LhaLdevelopnent should be consistent ,ftn "on""rr^tion ara enhancenent ofsi-gni,ficant natural fealures and aesthetlc amenlties and that a welL_developed conmun ity-supported comprer."."ir"-pi"i can be uLirrzed asa basi-s for declsions on growth. 'We suppor!'tie conmlssi.on r s effortsand. goars regardlng conservation or nauurar reaiu""s, and berleve lhatsuch a plan should be a traJor part of "re"y oiiy," piannlng i." p""j".t"sieilar to those at issue here.
Thank_you fon the opportunlty to present our vielrs. I hope that theyare of assistance to you in. addneislng these specffic ourl,fopr"nt, 'pllpo""f"
and Lhe water resources portlon or tnE piinnin! coomrssron;;-c;;;;l;;";""P1an.
0ciober 9, 1980,
raental Research,
Sincerely,
Richard F. Ber
{,^Ll*
cc: Georgette Sosin
Field 0ffice S
Er^*1
ryl
upenvlsdr
-
-tlt
July I3, l98L
The Honorable Tom Hamilton
Councilwoman pat SwensonCouncilman John Neveaux
Councilman DaIe GevingCouncilman Clark Horn
City of Chanhassen
609 Coulter DriveChanhassen, MN 55317
croachment, alter
and permanent 1yrecover f rom the runof f of normaL rainfcurtail the breeding o f fish and wildl.i
Respect Iy
Because none of our members have the sci ent i fic expertise that isneeded to articulate ^the specific probrems associated with wetJ.ands,we have.:ou9ht help from professional sources and others who havedeaLt with this issue.
Attached to this retter are copies of severar Ietters and documentst,le hope you'I1 fi nd in formativb and use fu1
0ur intent in writing and providing you with this information is toimpress upon you our-sincere bel ie i tnat cnannassen needi anordinanee tha t identifies and protects the wetrands in our-ci.ty.
l,l:.?:f _that .you give every consideration to this request for av{er.J.anos ordrnance. ^rf we may assist or facilitate this process inany way please feel free to cill upon us.
Dea r Council Members:
l: yoy know, our members have been concerned with severalthat have potential for major impaci-on'uotus t_at<e.
Recently, we discovered a common thread that Iinks severalconcerns about the lake to one issue __ the wetlandi. ----
We be 1i eve tha t any enwetlands will seveiely
-1SSUES
of our
ation or Ioss ofimpair the lake'saIIs, andfe native
our existingability toperhaps permanen tlvto the wetlanos.
n Nicola
Lake v
Homeowners AssociationLotus
JEN/p fr
Encl,osures
Russ Larson
Don AshworthBil.I MonkScott l,lartin
cc:
Freshwater Society
2500 Shadywood Road, Box 90
Navarre, Minnesola 55392
(6t2\ 471-8407
Georgette Sosin
Lotus Lake Associatlon
7400 Chanhassen Road
Chanhassen, llinnesota 55 317
letter of Concern to the
Thank you for theof the LoLus Lake area.
Wetl-ands not only act asthey help hold water in periods
storms and flooding.
Chanhassen Clty Councll:
opportunity of addresslng the erater quallty
July 7, 19 81"
conce rns
I have lncluded a copy of our ttShorellne Brochurefi whlch 1s being
l:li+.g n:T. week ro 18,000 peopte in the Lake Mlnneronka area. Thousands more!/r-tr De dlscrlbuted throughout the state by various Lake Assoclations. ThetherE of che Shorellne Brochure ls that th; Last place to manage a 1ake is j.nthe rake. Proper land manager€nt Is crucral to tnatntainlng anl preservlngwater quality.
Biologlst Del Hogen has stated to the ghanhassen city councir thar theirprinary task is to preserve the eretlands in thelr area. Theie wetlands wirr becrucial for providing nutrient adsorption and control of non_point pollutionfrom the deveroped areas already in existence. The trse of weElands for nutrienEabatement near present dereropment is one of the keys to malntaining the waterquality of Lotus Lake. Future deveropr*nt must bE-we ighed against-lts i*pacton the surrormding watershed. After all, the vaLue of lake f.op.rty is directlytied to the quality of rrater in that Lake. Any deveJ-opment r"rhtth dlstroyswetland acreage lessens your line of defense against erosi-on and the runoff ofphosphorus, nitrogen, and other various chemieils and meEar-s which enllnate fromdeveloped areas.
a filtering system for varlous pollurancs buEof heavy rain thus mininrizlng the affects of
water resources hold an inherent value for everyone, some people valuewater for its fish and wildlife, some people value lts irrigation pocentiat, its
l{ember5hrp Organiz.lron o, th€
Freshw.lrer Brologrcal R€s€arch Founddrrun
M{,nrLlrrsh'D.onllrburr,ns.r. r,,r,t, r,,,r..
-2-
lndustrlal cooling potentlal, lts aesthetlc and recreational purposes and
everyone needs safe water to drink. Very often these uses come into playin the sarE resource and the chall"enge ls balancing those uses so societyls besE served and the natural balance ls preserved. The question ls -
"How do we learn to live J.n harmony wlth a resource r,re desperately need to
uset'.
/. -i /;t( -.'-(,
There are many interests in the Lotus Lake area which need fo be
considered in deciding how the lake should be used now and in Ehe future.Itrs impossible to please everyone, but wlth sound management practices andthe basic understanding of the lakets ecology, your chances of malntainlngthe water quality of Lotus Lake are very good. And clean water is a benefltto us all.
Slncerely,
(,.'. i /, /(--:-
rlstine Olsenlus
Coordlnator
C0lCm
-
Ollrce ol
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Phone 448-3435, Ext. 217
CABVER COUNlY COURTHOUSE
600 EAST 4IH
CHASKA, MINNESOTA 5531B
COUNTY OT CAPVN]
Julg 6, 19 81
.rrs. ceo-rgette SOsjn
74O0 Chanhassen Rd.
Chanhassen, MN 553j7
Re..
Dear Ms. Sas in;
Lotas Lake deveTopnentaL pjans
Lotus Lake is a txemendous -resource for the citg and the
IEopLe of Cianiasser. Everg effort, I believe, should. be nade toprotect tltis ,esou-rce. To pxesetve tite hrater qualitg of the lakeis probabTg tie fi-rst objective t}]at siouJd De addressed, In mgjudgnent this objective can be enhanced greatlg bg the preventiZnof sedinentation entering the r-ake duting the periods of consttuctionand Xhe pxeservation of wetJ-ands that act as a fj-I ter sgstem for a-l.linconing surface watet .
However, as I pinted out to gou previouslg, I can onlgspea.k out as a concerned citizen. ?he area is conpJetelg in thejurisdiction of chanhassen Citg and its planninq connission andcixg counciT must ma.ke t}]e decjsions relativb to tiese probl.ems.
Afxer viewing tlle areas and hearing of the developmentaTplans for propetties or and surrou nding t-otui Lake, f feet gourconcerns regarding the inpact of such p-lans on Lotus Lake are wej'ljustified.
In cTosing, f wish to conmend goa and. gour otganization ongour abiTitg to recognize the pxoblems and also gour abilitg toexpress goDr cancetns in an unemotionaT nannet.
Sincerelg gours,
.)uAre
nex ,
untg
(..
erome J,
onmissio
Carver Co
JJA: n7
Alli mut ive ActKtn/ F-quol Opportutity Employer
lst ,ist.
United Stttes I)epirrtnrcnt ol' t hc Intcrior
In r!,LY lf,lfx To
Meobers of ClLy Counc 1I
Clty of Chanhassen
76 10 Laredo Drlve
Chanhassen, Mlnnesola 55317
Dear Councllmembers:
The weElands of concenn ln lhe proposed proJec! areas are domlnaledby sedges, rushes, catLatl , reed cananygrass, wlJ-Iows and submergentor floatlng-Ieaved aquallc plants such as pondweed, duckweed, waierltlles,and the Anerlcan ]oius. These areas were formerly refepred Lo as Type2, l, and Ll wetlands. The wetlands assoclaled wlLh the northern endof LoLus Lake are Lhe IasL of the weLlands adJacen! Lo the Iake !ha!
have not been dralned or filled. They pnovide fon floodwaten storage,
The U.S. Flsh and Wl]dllfe Servlce has been appnoached by the Lot,usLake Hooeolrnents Assoclatlon and the lresL pLeasan! vlew Road AssoclaLlonconcernlng pnoposed conslruclton actlvltles and theln effects on wellandsassoclaled wlth LoLus Lake and the rakers waLer quarlty. The tluo cltlzensrgroups were partlcularly concerned wj.Lh:
1. Derrlck Land Coopanyrs proposed houslng deveLopmen! and LheassoclaLed placemen! of a sedlmenlallon basln ln wetlands,
2. Lotus Lake EsLatesr houslng consLrucLlon, 1n and adJacenL!o wetlands, and
3. the cltyis proposed park deveropoent wrth lake access constructedLhrough a weiland, and dredglng ln Lotus Lake.
The Lwo nelghborhood assoclallons have requesLed lhab we provlde youwlth oun assessment of lhe lmpacts of lhese and slml]ar proposals toJ-ocal fish and wildllfe resources. ThaL assessEenL follow3.
The effec! of these proJects, and others, on Hetlands and Lolus Lake'swat,er quallly would be vaniable, and would depend on the exLent of eachproJecLrs dlsrupLlon ol exlsting rand featunes. The greaten the dlsturbanceto the exlsLing naLural areas, Lhe greater lhe posslblllt,y of adverseenvlnonmenlal effecls on LoLus Lake and lts assoclaLed wetlands.
FISI I ANI) WlLDLll'li SliRVt('tl
St. Paul Field Olfice, Ecological Sorvices538 F6d€ral Bulldlng and U.S. Court House
316 N orth Robort Streol
, St. Paul, Mtnnesota 55101
JuIy 7, 19B l
?
flltnallon of nutnlents and sedlment lrom runoff and provlde br_eedlng,feedlng, and resLlng habltaL ro" ".i""iJrf,""l^ror"o", and furbcarens.They arso pnovlde soawnlng areas fon flsh specles rcaldent in Lol_usLakc. Lorus Lake ri""rr "ont"r;r;;; ;;;ri;"ii ,n" blorostcar nroduc_t1v1ty, recneatlonal and aestheLlc ;;i;;;^lr;"tand values ot rhc area.
Dara are avalrable whlch document the varues of Lotus Lake and 1ts assoel-ated wetLands. Reports conlalnlng tnese Jaia-""commend how cerLalnconstructlon actlvltles can_proceed adJacent to lhe lake lrllhout destroylngil"rili"," natural vaLues. These daEa ina
-."oo*r"nOatlons
can be round
Octoben 9, t9BO,mental Besearch,
I,lanch 4
and the
Jl:lronmenral Survey by De1l Hogen of Inst.ru_
2
3
Reporl by the Chanhassen Lake Study ComrnltLee,
198.l , R11ey-pungatory creek t.Iatenshed Dlstrlc ! ReponL,
Sincenely,
4' June 13, 1980, rnventory and sunvey by canver sorr and i,rat,erConsenvatlon Dlstrlct.
Th!s^lnforBatlon glves suppont to the value of a Comprehenslve pLanfon Growth and Develoomgnt slmllan to tte-one-under devel_opment by t,heCltyrs Plannlng Cornnlsslon. Tno premls""
"i-ri" pnoposed plan arc Ehatdevelopoeni should be aonslsbent wf-tn conse.vatfon anO enhancemenL ofsignlflcant naLural feat,ures and aesthetlc amenllies and Lhat a weLl_developed commun 1!y-s upported comprehensj-ve pl.an can be uLi}lzed asa basls for decrslons on growth. wu "uppo"t't[e coru,lsslonrs effor'sand goals regarding conservation of natural f"utr""s, and believe thatsuch a ptan shouLd be a ma,Jor part oi;;;;; ;;;y," prannlng ror projecLsslmllar to those aL lssue here.
Thank^you for the opportunlLy to present our v1ews. f hoDe lha! thevare or assisrance ro you 1n. iooressins ,,""" "p""iii"-o;;:i";;:;r"llioo""."il:":n" water nesources porLlon or tnJ pi"rn,i[ Corrrssron,s Comprehenslve
Georgetto Sotfn ,-/
t
L
Artw*R,*,
Rlchand F. Berry IFleld Office SupervlsJn
W STATE OF
AOtrS@TA
EPARTMENT OF NATURALtro Region WaXers, 72OO Warner Road, St.RESOURCES
Pau7, MN 5 5106
F,kr No
P|lONt 296-7523
After our neeting on JuLg 6r lggl, Irve further reviewed the wetlandarea and t,he associated projects that we djscussed and. offer the foj'lot/_ing specific contnents :
Ils. ceorgexxe Sosin
7400 Chanhassen Raad
Chanhassen, Minnesota 5Sjj7
RE.. CHANHASSEN IIETLANDS
Dear lrs" sosin..
1) Derrick Lahd conpang--
SoiT and Water ConservaXion District staff (JustinJetfregs) has reviewed and accepted xhe erosion andsedjnent controT pjan developed bg Derrick. The DNRwiLL be issuing xhe pernit to Derrick for xheir projecx.
2 ) The wetTand. TocaXed aX and within Xhe pernanent sedi_ment pond for Derrickts project is predominaXeLg a tgpeII wetTard and ix Ties above the ordinarg high watexeLevation (OHw) ot Lotus Lake. (The OEW is the upperlinit of the DNRrs jurisdiction.) Tqpe II wetland.s,aTthough not under the DNRts jurisdicXion when thegJ-ie above the OHW, do serve a vajuable function foxnutrient entrapnent. There has been research shawingxhat tgpe II wetLands axe nuch nore vajuab|e for nutri_
enX entrapnenX than tgpe III wetTands.
3) Lotus Lake Esxates, OutLet C--
The project area incLudes a tgpe f wetland thatis below the OHW of Lotus Lake and it falis under
xhe pernit jurisdiction of the DNR._ The pronujgatedpermit ru-les generajlg do noX allow fiJTing of pro_tected $reXTands for developmenX. The projecX,s gtadingplans would have to be reviewed to detexnine exacXlqwhat is proposed and to fornuTate a Departnent pasition.
Wixhout specific infornaxion, I can nox connit to a posr_xion regarding the projecx.
4) CoToniaT crove proj ect--
?he wetTand involved ax this site ( located just westof fiighwaq 707) is a tgpe III wetjand " This weXTandhowever, does not fa77 under the DepartnenXt s juris-diction as it js noX shown on the protected i/ate-rsinventorg naps for Carvet Countg.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYEB
Julg 10, 798 7
NS. GEORGETTE SOSTN
JULY 70, 798 7
Page Two
5) EncTosed are tfie pxoXected Waters Inventorg
brochuxe and Xhe appropriate porXions ofCircufaz 39 that nag be infornative.
In cLosing, the DNR reguLates onlg certain Xgpes and sizes of wetLands.BasicaTTg in incorporated areas, the DepartnenX regulates tgpe III, VI ,and V weXTands that are 2, acres and larger. For Carver Countg theseaxeas have been identified on an official protected waters map for carverCountq. lhis nap attd our proglan nag have sone shoxxcomings in that gret_
l-ands of other tgpes or ones that are too snall, or ones XhaX are naX shownon xhe official nap are not xegul_axed bg the Deparxnent. lhese wetfandscettainTg serve valuable pultTic puxposes a::d thejr pzotection can onlq beassu-red through 7oca7 protection nexhod.s. Those nexhods can take the fornof LocaT wetLand ozdinances and/or 7oca7 pubTic invoTvenenx in the revie'r'of projects that inpact tJre resources. The locaL public invoTvenent can be
aE proached either on a ,,when and if gou learn of a project approachrt orthTough foruns such as naturai resources counciis that fornallg review affproposals and cornnent to the pjanning connission or citg councij.
A major factot in the success of ang wetland protection pxogram is thatthe v'texTands have to be shown xo have a tangiile benefit xo the owner andthe general pubfic nusx be nake aware of al"J of the benefits of wetlands
( stornwaxer sxorage, nuXrient entrapnenx I and groundwater recharge, nat justwildTife ) .
rf gou have ang questions or if you desire nore specific infomation regaxd-ing the Depaxtnent, s prograns ox wetLand va-Zues, pTease feel free to contact
SincereTg,
Kent Lokkesnoe
RegionaT HqdroTogist
EncTosure
Wetland Informat 1on
nt facEor de termlnlng
plant and animal
, weE meadows , poEholes,
- they fu
g museums
rn 1s h the
for teachlng
wetland. Ilore
een destroyed.
ts 232 of the
where an abundance of w aler ls the domlnathe nature of solL development and the types of
conrnunLtles llving there (marshes, swamps, bo gs
ver overflow land s)S
Wetla s are cause:
ln Ehe loss of weElands
Prov e na Eura 1 treatment of waEerborne and alrborne
-may recharge groundr,rater drlnklng suppLtes'
-give natural protectlon agalns storms and floods .,r.
produce a hlgh yleld food source for aquaElc anlmals
-o ffer a f 11ter 1ng systern for lakes and streams
-are ou tdoor educatlonal and sclentlftc laborator ies
resources for sclentlfic research and serve as livin
Ehese systems serve
lon acres of freshwa
than one-half the wetland s in the lower 48 states hav
t of about 12 mllllon acres of wetlands (that repre
ter
eb
sen
l-and ln Mlnneso ta)once found Ln MinnesoEa 10 million have aLready
been dralned,
-MinnesoEa ls second
-Wetl-and dralnage helped Minnesota rank 5th 'of
of agricultural products.
only to Ind tana .
the 50 stateg ln the vaLue
57. of aLL commercial flsh specles and at least 50 spec les of mammals are
offlclals
Many cormnunlEles have passed
.;
strlc! I,reElands ord lnances :
seven states elther have state wetland regulatory prog,rams or crlEical
gulatory programs wlth r.retland proEectlon components. WeLlands are
otected through deed restrlctions, covenants, and easements. Tax
ges are offered by federal and state goverfinents to encourage use of
l.ar1he we
proper offlelalshe
ite'r'your vlews to congressman or local1oa
tles that aff
iclpate ln pu
r
ta
u Ppo
I
.emalnlng
emental
survlva
's?
.
.
lon and
f
wetl
rma
nd
n t
o
t
r
e
s
s
t
of1
s
a
r
nd
I n8
o
and
t
ec
r
tI
and
o
ep
sv
e
t
1
1
i
t
n
f
rl
ea
we
h
wr
1c
nd
bl,
a
rt to the proper
t
evlc es.
.::,,
:. of f Ielals,.
From A C ase For Land and I.Iater Use p ollcies bPaul Plannl ng Depar tment ln the l'fa
y Gunnar Isberg of the St.
Ph oto captlons ;ttMetro Area Marshes
y-June 19 74 iss ue ofare fast being fll ,
Ttre H+nnesota Vol unteer.
l-eo and 1os t todevelopment. He re, slopes are cut awa y to flII part of a 40-acre marsh f or anapartmenE compl ex.""In May, con trac t ors began fll1ing thi6 St. paul ma rsh wlthdebrls. Urban sprawl has swallowed up many such areas," And narratlve3
rne
surface and under ground lraters of the s tate are valuable resources whlch mus E
l ne
be preserved for thelr best use, More information ts needed of the rself-cleanlngr,i-capabllity of many of our streams, lake s, wetlands and ground waEerslands and vra ters classlfled as groundwa ter recharge areas must b e protected.Dralnage, dlsposa I and other ma n-made c hanges can severely aIter recharge lands, and pollute the groundwaler system and may cause serLous future problems.','rAcqulsltlon of wlldllfe management are as should be ac cel era Eed 1n ares whereurban or agricuJ-tural development threa tens destructlon of hablt at, especlal lyprirne wetland s areas.tt
From
coordlnat
September "ffi-October I972, Beginnlng on p
by John Skrypek, envlronmental co ntrof
age 31.
e and F1sh. In The Minnesota Volunteer;
.
t' *0"..]llltil"Xil]ll!'i:;iH.::' preservarlon or werlands have emphas lzed thelr
"When connected to lakes and streams rr,lth permanent fish populatlons, wetlands.may also be lmportant flsh spar^m lng areas, especlally for nort hern plke.,,t'In urban areag , \aretlands are provid 1 ng outdoor classroons where stude nts canstudi ecoLogy, 11vln g animals, and organls ms, Wetlands provide o pen space that isa pleasant re11ef ir om the monotory oi "on flnlng urban aieas, wet lands retard therunoff of water from meltlng snow and ral n. In thls rray,these natural ,,s pong es,,.- reduce flood dama ge to dorrnsEream areas.Wetlands also hav e a beneflclal recharg ingeffect on undergr ound, water-bearing forma !lons.rl. I ,r .1....
.: . that:I"":i:#il ro rhese vatues, . r"r.lg.excltins role of lrerrands is emerglng,,-',:...]',.andprotectingl,aterqua1ity,,,
. ._.t:..: wnen vater enters a wetland, therefore, it brlngs along many things. Anong'";' these are sllt. organic matter from J;;;;i", pl-ants aid urri.Lr-rra many different
.
;; " dis"or""d chemical co*pr;;;;-;.;;"ilHii and rocks of rhe surroundins r.ratershed.,,
i';r.' "htren water enters a lretrand, lts rate.of f10w dlmlnlshes due Eo pondlng, and:,'' the reslstance of abundant g.oran" "r-rqlrai" plants. a"-it,"-r]io"rry of waEer' ' is srowed down' its ablliry t; ;;;.;'";i;"and o.her parrlcres rn suspension is',:.: decreased, The oarticles irop ""a,.Ii-".aare ro the bortom _ wht
..,.
bu ,n.hored and s tab ir ir"a -iy'.t,I-rola'"|l.u*"
of aquatlc pr"nr".,ir. they may
' t'some of the dlssolved phosphorus enterlng a,.wetrand becomes physicarry boundto stlE parrlcres and setrres .;'il.-;";;;: :'ji ',porrlons ot trre ptrospnorus andli:;'::: :i[5':;o;":';rl";:fiil;':i;",:i""""i*",'"0 .,,a "-"'gu,,i"irI.,l'g,o,tr, ,r,u..
, , ,. , t', ..-
t
"Mu"h of'the nltroc^- --.fo., ";;;;y-;#=,;';i::;:: .ii!I":"i;:.?* il:";"ll;; ll;:":;""lilliili";""reduce nitrates to gaseious nlErogen "ti"','i" ieleased to'the atmosphere.,,
CITY O F
CE.EANX.f,ASSEN
M INNESOTA
WETLAND CONSERVATION BASTNS
WETLAND TYPES
Meadow
Shallow Ma rsh
Deep Marsh
Open Water llakes & ponds
Wooded Swamp
WATERSHEDS & DRAINAGE
Maior Watershed Boundary
Sub Watershed Boundary
Outlet Stream
Outlet Ditch
Wetland lndex Numbers
lO3l donotes section 3
lo4l d€notes 4th wetland arsa ln sectlon 3*
NOTE: lncludes adjacent marsh vegetation
Lr.,-.*. I
IA
03-o4
r@o' !oo' o'2ooo' 360' :looo
I
I
F---'--ltr
ao. nop ,r.podd: AUGTJST, 1975
Crry ol Cnonhor..., Pl.n^r^c 0.porrh.nl
Sou.c.r Corrrr SollA Wot., Conr.ry6lroh
0i.lrict Stoll April 1978
,:
Shrub Swamp
ffitl
^::
)
.t5 ot-ot
\
\
(
)
)
or
(
\s ./ t4-o6
-i-
I
t4.o7
(-/-
r
r- 03
(
2-08\
llatT\\
\,zP
I
^l
.\-.'
FFt!,bJ !*
.,]
(
E
(
\
I
t\-"
O -O3.- -.
-02 t
I
ffi
)
4
t4-02
l
-o..\
t4-o3
!
t3-06
r3-03
t4 -0I
-r+jot>-
I
(
t
I
\
(4-O9
\92 ,
\-
)
ot
K
l
il\
I
I
r-
A rcgrrlar mccting of the chanhassen park and Recreation conmission was ca1ledto order on Jrrne 2, 19S1 at 7:40 p.m. The follotving nenbers ""r" prur"ia,Phyl lis Popc, Ilary Mucrhauscn, I'ri:hael Lynch, Jack f,rauritz, una io'"-woil"t".
ITINUTUS: ,A motion rvas nade by Jack l,lauritz and seconded by Mary lrluelhausen toapprove the ninutes from the rast meeting as read. r'tt i on' unaniro,r. if-lpp"or" a.
trli nut e s
Park anrl Rccrcation Corunission
Junc 2, 19S I
REVIEhI DEVELOP}IENT PLANS - l"lARK KOEGLER: Markat the meeting t o di s cr.rs s r',ith the Comnission tEstates Park, Lake Susan park and Lake Ann park
maps and one master plan for each area.
PETITION SUB}IITTED TO THE CITY:
re l ocat ion of th e bicycle motor- c
Barn is completed.
El ectrici ty is installed.
KoegLer, Schoell-Madson, was pres en t
he developrnent plans for the Chanhassenareas. The plan is to develop base
Each park area was discussed fully with r'rarkr s aim being to establish priorities,to get the Conrnission's opinion on facility design, whai the active ani passiveactivities should be, and who-rvould be using the park areas. In the next rneetings,plans from Schoell-Madson rvi-ll be submitted for the Park and. Recreation cornmission'srevl erv ,
A petition was subnitted to the City regarding theross tTail from behind the Fire Departrnent-
198i C-'\PITAL II{PROVEI{ENT PROJECTS
the fol lorving park
AND SCHEDULES:The Conrnission was advised of the
areas :
progress towards compl et j-on on
Money scheduled for parking area,
The City will try to resolve the problem at the bottorn of the hill thernselves.Further landscaping sti11 to be d6ne.Sign for this area delayed until park is renamed.
Lake Ann:
En trirncc
Sign for
R i cc -lula rs h Park:
Bal l diamond comp 1c tcd.
lvat cr - no source.
can n01{ bc fi-n i slrcd.
this arca detayed until park is renaned.
I'linncwashta lleights :
(
A notion was made by Jack Mauritz and seconded by Michael Lynch that the park andRecreation commission look for another place for location of trai1, ani check withthe city attorney regarding liability t; the city in response to t;is petition.lulot i on unanimously approved.
Itestern Hl11s:
I'linutes
Park and Recreation Commission
Page Tr,ro
Carver Beach:
Staff rvas directed to go out
have each sign scaled to the
(
Parking area can be done for rnoney allocatcd.
Landscaping 3nd plantation to be done fron the tree farm.
City H311 :
Sti11 in the completion stage.
Grading and plantation to be finished by fall.
Vita Course ordered - to be installed this sunmer _ includeswill be spread out to Lake Ann.
Tennis courts in good shape - no resurfacing necessary.
20 stations whi ch
for bids on the signs for the park areas and toindividual park si ze,
THOIIPS0N DEVELoPMENT: ptans for this developnrent were tenporarily put on holdin order for changes to be made.
P l anning Conmission wants the position of the road changed.Position of theai 1 be chan edt over es t
Plans l.iill go back to the City Council,
A notion was made by Jack Mauritz and seconded by Joe Warneke thatadjourned, Motj.on unaninous ly approved. Meeting was adjourned at
Cthe neeting be
9:30 p. n.
Respectful ly submitted,
Sherma Coombs
I
I
(
CITY OF
EHINH,1SSHffi
690 COULTER DRIVE . P.O. BOX 147 ' CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 553]7
(612) 937-1900
TO:
FROM:
NATF.
SUBJ:
Mayor and City Council
Don Ashworth, City Manager
June 1, 1981
Final Development PIan Review, Fox ChaseLand Company (Revises previously Approved
Addition, Derrick
Development Plan)
The following report has been divided into four sections:
I. Status - JuIy 2L, l9AO plan Approval
If. Status Report - Finat Development plan AmendmentI'ox Chase Addition, Derr j-ck Request,
III.
rv.
Kathy Schwartz Report of May 2, Lggl- and Responses to Such Report
Kathy Schwartz Report of May 26, :-g8L.
The purpose of breaking the report into four distinct sections is toa11ow the city council the gre;test amount of flexibiriiy in determininghow to proceed with this issue. specifically, should th-e council deter-mine_ that tonight's session-shour"d only concentrate on the responses tothe Kathy sch'rartz report of May 2nd. A11 encrosures relati,ve to thatresponse have been accunulated. as a part of Section rrr. shourd thecouncir determine to concentrate onry in terms of $rhat was previouslyapproved, enclosures relative to this are encompassed in seition l. -
Should the Council desire to concentrate on Mrs. Schwartz' report #4,such has been included. However, as this office did not receive thist:p9lt until the day of writing thj-s report to the City Council, nostaf f coments are i-ncluded in this seclion.
This office would recommend that the council proceed with the reviewof this item as an amendment to a previousry -approved finar deveropmentp1an. should thi-s recorunendation Le consid3real rroperuriy, er,.losrrr.=included under secti-on rr are arr incrusive arlowini ror tinar acti.onthis evening.
MEI{ORANDUM
I
\'
;
I
;
I
I
:
J
SECTION I
Statu s July 21, 1980 Plan Approval
Ij
--SECTION I
Status JuIy 21., 1980 PIan Approval
Attached prease find a report from the ci.ty Attorney's office which,basicarly, states that the deveroper has one year i.i which to completeconditions set by the city councir. stated another way, the deveiopermust meet the conditions of the final deveropment plan- approvar pritr toasking for preriminary prat approvar and he has thL or," ylur period oftime, from final deveropment plan approval to complete tirese conditionsand request preriminary plat approvar. rn the specific case of FoxChase Addition, the developer has until JuIy 21, 19g1 to meet theconditions_ set by the city councit. Attached please find a listing ofall conditions that were set as a part of the Juty 21, 19go approvil.Although discussion may have occurred by Mr. Derr-ick in regards to anumber of the points, basically a majority of the conditiois set by thecity council have not been met. rt should be recognized., however, thatMr. Derrick stil1 has until July 2Lst, 1991 to complete ihese conditionsand that some of the conditions rerate to work thal woutd be necessaryafter
.
prel iminary plat approval was given. Therefore, conditionsassociated vrith specific constructi-on plans or the act.uar constructionitself would typicalry become a part oi the preriminary ptii approvarand incorporated into the development contrait but tog-i-citry would notbe completed prior to preliminary plat approval
Conditions of April 7 1980
That the
g rading
from the
applicant receive approval ofplan, drainage plan and erosion
1 theircontrol pLan
Soil Conservation Servi ceMinnesota Department of NaturalRiley Purgatory Creek Watershed
Re s ources
Dis tri ct
2
.1
That said approvalsbeing resubmitted topfat approval.
be received priorthe City Council
to the matterfor preliminary
for theblock 3
re vi ewe d
4
5
That_ the pedestrian and conservation easement portionof the proposed devefopnent must be shown by tireappj-icant to have such soil conditions as wou j.d aIlowfor-the development of such facilities, and that theapplicantr s soil condition evidence is to be reviewedby the City Engineer.
That the applicant prepare cul-de-sac plansroadway portion in the vicinity of 1ot 20,and lot 24, block 1. Said plans are to beand approved by the city engineer.
Paved street surfaces are to be 36 feet wide andpaved cul-de-sacs are to be 32 feet in diameter-
That the Park and Recreation Commi.ssion reviewalternative trail locations betr.reen pleasant ViewRoad and the conservation easement and is to submita recommendation to the City CounciI.
6
Conditions of Julv 7. lg 80 ( i r ems 2 3. an 4)
7 The location of the trai.I is sti11 uncertain atthis time, i.e. whether along the back l-ot linesor abutting the street on the north end of thedevelopment. In meeting with the park andRecreation Commission, the developers have statedtheir desire to have this decision withheld untilgrading is commenced and park and RecreationCommissioners afforded an opportunity to walk bothpotential locations. this iuggestioi appears tocreate some problems in preparation of a- developmentcontract (outlining two potential location "r""!1,
-
but no other reasonable alternative appears to exist.However, in accepting the final develoiment ptan,it should be clear that the outlor "i"'i i" b;i;;'accepted as a conservation area and, as such, n6park credits are being given. Further, that it
i"_to. the advantage oi itre developer to have thets toot trgiJ. through the conservation and, whethersuch be within this conservation area or partiallyadjacent to the road, that developers agree to gradeand install wood chips for the trail in accord.ancevrith the recommendations of the park ind necreationCommission as a part of their overall grading pIan.
As a part of both the East Lotus Lake project andNear Mountain development proposals, significantdiscussion occurred in.regirai to the city,s uUiri-ty
!o ass,jr: that. public impiovements are deiigned and-rnspected to City standards. In conformanci withthese discussions, it is recommended that the developerbe required to use the city's engineei for p."lir"iilrr-of- plans and specification-s and itt staking- anhinspection.
I
9 The above conditions are in addition to those outlinedby the Land Use Coordinator in his reports of July 9and 17, and the Engineer,s report. of iuly 7__suchdisregarding those variances ^approved by-the CityCouncil du-ring preliminary deveiopment !fa" "tpil,".f ,i.e. length of cul-de-saci and stieet grades.
10.That a conservation easement be established withinthe area beLow the 900 foot -"i;";;i",l pursuant to theComprehensive plan and that "itfri"-.a:.a conservationeasement, a pedestrian_way easement be d.di;;t;;"r".,that is I feet wide with i_-i;;-;; either side forpurposes of maintena!9e (the above--would ""iii;y-;;"proposed 20 foot trail easemu"i - iial ".ted. on theproposed preliminary plat dated lf"v :-2, 1980, withthe understanding, tlrai tfre "1""""i1="ribed easementwould be estabti;hed "p""-""*piJtiJn ot a feasibteroute within the conseivation. eis"m""tl.
11'That the applicant and its contractors, includ.inohome builders, carry out the "o.," t.."lio;";i "*r^,,l-mprovements and structures in accora.rr"e with thereguirements set forth by the-- *---'
Riley purgatory Creek Watershed Districtsoil- conservatLon- s.rrri".-i"ui;";i"" Reportdated June 18, 1980
(The City Council recommendation is that the approvalsbe obtained before their revieV"oi-tfr. prelimj.narypfat. For sualification p".;;;";; inu "ir.y
pursatorvcreek warershed Distri.a ;;;-;;;;i j conditionarapproval t" an"t:_y?y 6, tggO', .or.f=ponO.nce, however,the Soil Conservation Service, Uuirri .r, advisorybody, will not oivgn f"i.j-.iln"Iipi"r"r. Ho\^/ever,r be.l-ieve such fray b"';;;i=;;;i ltli"si, carryins ourtheir recornmendarl,ons ah;-;;;; ,ioiIa i,., trr.i.,evaluation report)
12.That extra precautions be taken so that removal of::i::il:.I:serarion may be kept t- a minimum durins
l3.Por reasons "f ""11^::"ditions and slopes, the buildinqplans for a1l residences proposea wiif,in the subjectdeveropmenr should.b" ;;.[i;i;i-ir"i" archirect orcivi-l engineer registered in tf.,u-itut" of Minnesota.
14'That the applicant be required to post sufficientescrows to assure that. the degree 3i- ""9i"""iirrg
-and inspecrion is carried. ""a';;-.;;ommended by theRiley purgatory creek watershed oi=iii.t and theSoiL Conservation Service.
Condi tion.s of July 9, 1980
Council approval ofas presented on JuIy
15. Submit and receivebased on the plan
such to 52 1ots.
development pIan.21, 1980, chingins
Conditions of July 7, L98O
17.
18.
19.
20.
STTTEETS -
i:,.,.. The rigi:t-of-r*ay aoC street ryidths meet the ordinance fora residential street. Iiowever, i,t seems. to me that the main
. street through the d=velopment 1\,iL1 ultimately b= a collectorrstreet---thus a ryider street width should. be considered-
SA].{ITARY SEI.'E11.
.. _ Intersection radii are not sttotvn and shou.r cI l:e ir:dicated'as -20 feet. Grade on street ,,A,, exceed.s both the 7?6 ma-ximt:-nand 3% within 3O feet of cul-de-s . Vertical curves oncul-de-sacs ,,E" (ub-er end.) and ,,p,r (at intersection) are J.ess':than 20 tirnes the al.g=bz'arc difference as rcquired by ordinance_n Cul-de-sac ,,E,' also excead.s the 500 foot maximum :-enltfr. Themethod-of providing a ',temporary,' cu1-de-sac at the 6orlf, enct of
:,.,ah.
*oi. street is not clear and shoufd be shoivn -
Size of the proposed sanitary selverassumed to be B-inch_ Easement for theexisting manhol-e to nanhole in strcet ,,A
17. Block 3) is not shorvn_ Manholcs inextended to e.l-i:ninat'c serr,,ices Circctly
is not shorrn, ):utsanitary server from
" (betrveen Lots l-5cu].-de-sacs shouldinto the manhol_es -
and
be
' '. -:t,
shown- We recommend B-inch';n1cul-de-sacs- Since cu]--de-sacsuggest the watermain be looped
, or looped to existing rrater on
'' .. ,.-..': :-'. . _' ' il?. b'.
' ,.:: , .:-' ' .. ;;1ri,?-;'.:-
-." " . --:-- r):_.':.
.,.,'.:' : : " 3i'""'Pro_Dosed drai.nage works appear to be adequate with t]- e excep_tion that the 3o-inch discharge pipe at 1.5% grade shouLd be .:..- /increased to 36-inch. .. I
WATER.[4AIN-
Size of the iyatermain is notthe main street and 6-inch on thenE" is in excess of 5OO feet, weinternaLly within the deve lopment
Huron.
DR.AI\TAGE I./OR]<S.
COI{CLUSIONS:
; subjecr to th* i;;" '''
specifically noted. In terms of street g.ad"", vre recommend.waiver of the 7% ma-xinum grade rimitatio; in favor of the gradesproposed- The site s i-'npJ-y does not facilitate 7g6 maximurn lradesand wa feeJ- th- proposed grades are accepEable-
16.
,Z
,:
I
2
UPDATED COMI\,IENTS ON ABOVE CONDITIONS
StiII applicable
Covered under plan amendnent proceedings.
The applicant has received Water Shed District approvalon the previ-ous plan. On the current ptan amendment, theWatershd Dist.rict wants to review a Final plat approvedfirst by the City. DNR has revi.ewed and commented onthe plan amendment. It is possible that a DNR permitwill not be necessary.
3
The City Engineer has recommended that the right-of-waybe dedicated to the Westerly property 1ine. The CityEngineer will also review detailed construction plani
when prepared.
6
5
7.
a
10.
11.
L2.
13.
14.
Still applicable. (A changeapplicant . )
has been requested by the
The Park and Recreation Commission wishes to review theplacement of the trail and conservation easements at thetime when grading is taking place. Staff believes thatthis is to Iate and thus recommends the trail and con-servation easement be provided as per the plan amendmentrecomnendations of the Planning Commission and staff.
Reference comment #6 above.
Still- applicable.
Stil1 appl j.cabIe.
StiI1 applicable.
Still applicable.
Stilt appl icable.
StiL1 applicable.
StilI appl j.cable.
Additional additions condj-tj.ons relative to the plan
amendment that are recommended by the planning Corunissionand staff are found j-n the Planning Report of April 17,198I and the Planning Commissj-on minutes of April 22, l9}:- .
Status Report
SECTION II
Final Development Plan Amendment RequestI'ox Chase Addj"tion, Derrick
S tat us Final Development Plan Amendment
Fox Chase Addition, Derrick
Request
On May 4, the City Council considered the recommendation ofCommission and additionally considered public comments. Assubmitted by Kathleen Schwartz was of significant lengthreceived for comments prior to this meeti.ng, theCouncil acteal toon this item to June 1, 1981.
ia-
the Planningreport #3,
and not
table action
After receiving final development plan approval, and recognizing thatvarious conditions must be met within a one year period, Mr. Oeirickapproached the City asking that this final development ptan be amended.His contention was that although final devel_opment plan approval hadbeen given, that changes proposed by himself would be beneiicial toboth the City as weII as himseLf and, therefore, it made no sense toseek approvals from soil conservation service, DNR, watershed District,etc- if an amended pran would be considered by the council. r have notasked the city Attorneyrs office or city planner to verj-fy their carendarsas to when Mr. Derrick, s initial request may have occurred, but it isgenerally believed that such was approximately the first of the year.Derays in his formalizing the reguest for a plan amendment primaiilyrelated to guestions concerning whether the aity wourd cons-ider suci,procedures that would have to be foltowed if an amendment were to beconsidered, and r^rhat affects this amendment vr'ould have on the originar
1pproval. In any case, an initial revieh, did occur at the planning
commission revel wherein the attorney verbarry stated that his prniimi.,aryreview showed that a new pubrj-c hearing wourd be required. Mr. Derrickwithdrew his request for further planning commissiori review. Mr. Derrickthen submitted a letter to the city counail asking the city councir toamend the final deveropment plan. This item was ionside."l by the councilin April at v,/hich time the counci-l noted that they wourd not waive thepubric hearing reguirements and that they would rEquest that ttre planning
commission carryout such a hearing. significant discussion occurred asto whether a1r potential issues would be consid.ered in the pubric hearingprocess or vrhether such public hearing shoutd only address changes in th6plan in comparison the approved ptan of ,Ju1y 2f, 1990.
The Pranning commission did hold a pubric hearing on Aprir 22, rggl .A copy of the minutes of that public hearing are aitached. The minutesappear to reflect a Planning commission recommendation of denial withspecific conditions. However, at the last City Council Meeting, Mr.Michael Thompson did state that it was his beI1ef that the motion reflectedan overall denial unless the various conditions were met. rn essence,he stated that the-E6Ef6n- was to be considered a recommendation of approvalif aL1 of the conditions noted were met.
Should the City Council desire
amended final development planto be resolved and incorporated
amendment approval.
I r,rould recommend that the Council followsthis section in carrying out the review of
summary recommendation from th.is office ofincluded at the end of this report. BringIast packet.
to proceed with considering approving anfor Fox Chase, the following issues needas a part of the final development plan
the procedures set forth inthis item. Additionally, athe issues to be resolved isthe plans as enclosed in your
1. Number of Lots
Developer I s Request dated Apri I 15, 1981:
There has been a great deal of discussion of the number of lots tobe finally platted. We have never conceded that the City has the rightunilateralry to reduce the number of rots i-n the plat berow that whiahis permitted in single family residential zoning. This, r"re felt, was
done. arbitrariry when the prat was approved at the 21 Jury 1990 CouncirMeeting and the number of lots was reduced from 54 to 52. Notincj.dentally, no consideration seemed to have been given to the 69lot units assessments which are pending.
in
we
A11 of the above notwithstanding and in the spirit of cooperationnging this protracted platting matter to a satisfactory cIose,
_prepared to finally plat 52 lots as shov/n on the enclosed proposedif we can come to agreement on the other items discussed heiein.
bri-
areplat,
(April 17, l-981 Report;Report, Section III) :
AIso see May 2, 1981
At any time throughout the review of the subject proposal thisoffice does not reca11 any of the prans showing moie thin i5 units.rt was presumed that the appl-icant had calculated the pending 59 unitassessment into his rand use deveropment proposals and chose to forlowa market that would serve lower density, larger 1ot deveropment. Thisis understandably quarifiable as to when the applicant madl his initiarassessment search on the property.
.In determining the land use density for developments, andespecialry in the case of planned Residential Develolment oi.tricts,there is the need to make certain judgemental decisi-ins inctudingenvj-ronmental concerns, and reasonabla density standard. ThePlanning commission specificarry mentioning environmentar constraintsthe subject property, did, based upon the information avaitable tothem, find the proposal acceptabre at 49 and 52 rots respectably. Atthis time, this office feers that. the Final Deveropment bensity-rerative to the 69 units assessed i-s not germane to the nranningcommission consideration and it is recomrnended that the planningcommission not act to change the gross density estabrished by theCity Council untiL so instructed by the CounciI.
2. Street Width
of
This matter was discussed in our letter of 25 Maxch 19g1 toDon Ashworth. rf this street is constructed at 3Gr width it wirl beone of onry three streets in the city of chanhassen so constructed.REQUEST: Council reduce the street width to 32 feet.
Developer ' s Reque s t dated April 15, 1981:
Schoel l & Madson I s Comments dated May 13, 1981:
following
ccess or
and fee I
o not
blocked
esidenti.al
Concerning the matter of a secondary access. I have thecomments. This applies to the issue of e]-ther .., "*"rgarr"y "a permanent access. I have expressed this view in the pasi,strongly about it as relates t; the typical subdivision. f'abelj.eve there to be a great safety .,"1d to have i "u"""a.ry .The experiences that the City has had where fallen trees hivethe road are unique to areas Iike Carver Beach. The normal r
Planner ' s Comments :
page -2-
subdivision does not have great potential for stormsthe road and thus blocking emergency vehicles. If it
emerqency vehicle (in a typical street section) couldon the lawns around the tree. Downed trees normallyfoliage months so snow should not be a problem.
blowing trees over
d j,d occur, thesimply drive
occur in the
PIease don't misunderstand that Iaccesses. I am not, except in the caseachieve, I believe that to be the case
1) The Carver
2l Additional
3) There are
be used.
Staff had recommended that thePath in order to mitigate the singleproperty. No change is recommended.
am opposed to secondary
where it is difficult toin Fox Chase for these reasons:
be required in
connections.
Beach road system is poor at best.
trees $rould need removal.
grade problems depending on which connection would
4l Additional right-of-way acquisition wouldCarver Beach to make most of the proposed
City En gineer's Conunents dated May 18, 1981:
City Pl"annerrs Comments dated April 1,7 , 1,981 :
35 foot
access
width street for Foxsituation of the subject
- We are advised that the property has pending 69In light of the fact that only 52 units are approved,assessment should be reduced accordingly.
REQUEST: Council reduce the pending assessment to 52
3. Previously Installed AssessmentsDeveloper's Request dated April 15, 1981:
Manager ' s Recommendation: Den y Request
4. Road Alignment
Developerrs Reguest dated April 15, 1981:
This question lrras discussed at lengthAshworth (25 March 1981). By aII measures,of installing the road. The homesites alI
and Less grading and soil correction wouldproperty in this fashion.
REQUEST: Council approve the change j-n the
in our letter to Mr. Donthis is the best method
have a better conf igurationbe necessary to prepare the
unit assessments.this pending
units.
road alignment.
Planner's Comments dated April 17, 1981 and May 2, 7981 :
This is inin the northerly reference to the proposed alignment of Fox path
7/3 of the devel-opment. This office endorses the
Based on safety considerations, Fox path should be wider thanthe normal 28' because of the sweeping curves and steep grades. Evenwith doubte access, the street should be at Least 32' wide. Fox pathis a proposed residential street and excess width is not being required,to make it an eventual collector.
page -3-
proposed change provided said rearignment is constructed to standardsacceptable to the City Engineer.
It is the recollection of this office that the curved streetwas presented as not being of any consequence to the prominent standof pine trees in the northwest portion of the property.
We learned at the staff meeting of 9 April 19gl that by"conservation easement" the city means no stiuctures includi-ng docksare permitted on the lakeshore lots; this vras never previousl! sodefined and it is a groundless and unacceptable limiiation. LotusLake is a Generar Deveropment Lake, arr iiparian lots meet both cityand Department of Naturar Resources (DNR) standards in every respect;only these ten lots will have access to Lotus Lake.REQUEST: council instruct the city attorney not to include in theDevelopment Agreement any extraneous provisions limiting useof riparian lots.
5. Conservation Easement
Developer ' s Request dated April 15, L981:
April 17, 1981 and May 2, t98l:
Managerr s Coftunents dated A
The City, in approval of previous subdivisions and plannedResidential Development Districts, i.e. Lotus Lake Estates, RiceMarsh Manor, and Reichert Addition, have praced conservation easementsprohibj-ting structural alterations to the Iakeshores.
State law does not permit the designation for trail andconservation easements on the finat plat d.ocument. The City hasconsistently estabrished such easement through the deveropmlntcontract. The finar prat document wilr need to have drainage andutirity easements designated in compliance with surdivi s ion'ord inance33 and as per the City Engineer's rlcommendations .
pril 17, 1981 :
Manager' s Comments dated June 1, 1981:
Although the City. Council has generally encouraged developers tocreate a conmon outrot to be used by atl parlies within a subdivision,there is-no requirement for this unier thl ordinance. trre-ptan aspreviously submitted did encornpass a common outrot. The cuirent pJ.andoes not reflect this.
be
ing
._In meeting with the developer, this past week, he stated they wouldwilling to accept the area as recommended by the City pi"""er, includ_trail easements and requirements of such, witt att 6r tn. conditions
Planner ' s Comments dated
As shown in the planning report of July 17, 19gO (item number 2),the.previous approval encompaised specific r6quiremenis'as-wett asoptionaL construction technlques fo-r the traii through th; proposeddevelopment. As resubmitted, a third potential roca[.ion has now beendefined. It is recornnended that."r,y .pprorral be conditioned upon theapplicant resolving this issue with- the- park commission and th;t cityCouncil concurrence and/or modification of any agreement between thedeveloper and Park commission must occur prioi to submission of thepreliminary p1at.
typicarly required in a conservation easement (no firring, clear-cutting,structures, etc,) '.rith the exception that each individuai'Iot beall'owed one dock. Mr. Derrick supports his belief that docks should bealrowed througrh the proposed LakL- sLudy ordinance which arrows onedock for each lot having at least 100' in width on a lake. Typically,the councir would arlow a common beach lot (if the prat were in theform of an outiot versus separate ownership. i.e, East f,otus f,aXe).However, exceptions do exist in plats such- as the Reichert Addition,i.e. three docks were aLlowed foi the 9 lots.
Recogni-zi-ng that the deveJ.oper would be wirling to agree to arrtypical conditions of a conservation easement for th6 area outlined bythe Planner and recognizing conditi-ons of the trair- =y"i",n,-tr.,i=office sees the i.ssue of an individuar dock for each iot having a widthof 100' at the rake, versus a sharing of a dock for every other lotmeeting-the 1.00' requirement, versus one dock for the "rriiru addition,as sole1y a policy decision.
page -4-
Public Im rovemen t s
Deve I oDer sRe uest dated Aoril 15, 1981:
Managerrs Comments dated June 1., 1981:
Th6
action on
7. Access to Pleasant View and Buildin q PermitDeveloper ' s R equest d ated ApriI 15, 198I
. we request the City of Chanhassen install ordinary municipalutility and street improvements in Fox chase. we uirderitand you mustorder a_ feasibility study, accept the feasibility study, ina oraer trrework' Because the city Engineei has arready "o.pitea ih. ,,u."."urydata for feasibility study, in this case thl rea'siu:-iriy -
"trray "..,be ordered, presented and accepted at one meeting. we irave aireadyagreed to pay for the actual drafting and preparition of the documents.hereby wai-ve our right to a public h6aring- at that meeting ind ask thatorder the r'/ork to go--forward upon acceptance of the feasi6irity report.rn discussions with Mr. craig Mertz we-have proposed the assessments beanortized over fifteen years with pa],ment in- tuit due j-n
""r.r, y..r=.REQUEST: Council:
a. Order and accept feasibility study and order a1l publicimprovements.b. Assess arl improvements to Fox chase, with costs divided, among all-J.ots equally. By this request, we waive publichearing of the assessments.c. Assess said public improvement costs over a fifteen yearamortization period with entire amount payable in sevenyears.
We
you
feasibility_study is anticipated to be complete thisJune L5, 198L. Therefore, no action can be taken at for
time.
week
thi-s
Because the majority of the rots have been sord to Lroyd Leirdahl:l I.i-1"_.="!a cenrurv Buirlers rnc. , and in ttrai--rox-cr,rl.-il compriscd9t.:Y9 separate parcers, there wourd normarly be permitted tr,ro residentialbuirding permits. Mr. Lroyd Leircrahr proposes to buird two resid.ences,on the northeasternmos t and southeas teinmost rots or tne piat. Theformer is to be a model for the parade of Homes in augustl the ratter wilrbe a private residence for Mr. Leirdahl . rt is underitood that occupancy
6.
Page -5-
permi ts
REOUE ST :
may be withheld until water and sewer are hooked uD.Council permit two resj_dential structures, moving one permitfrom Lot 11, Vineland, to covernment Lot 5.
Plannerr s Comments dat ed Ap ril 17, 1981 and Mav 2 1981.:
As stated previously, the northeasterly most proposed Iot isproposed to have direct access to pleasant vlew noad. Due to the gradedifferential between this rot and Fox path, this office has no probremswith issuing a building permit after the finat deveropm.nt - pr un approvarhas been given by the City Counci1. As to a building f".m:-i on thesoutheasterly lot (proposed Lot 19, Block 1) I feel it "t " buildingpermit should not be issued untir the city has received. an executeddeveropment contract from the appli.cant that would assure that theschedule of work would proceed in an order that wouta noi fresent an undu*.delay between the time that an occupancy permit would be rlquesteo anathe time in which the road bed would be- stabilized and/or bise courseof asphalt be installed,
rt has been the recommendation of this office that no individualaccess be given onto pleasant View Road for Lot 3 Btock 2 of the plandated Aprir 15, 1981, and that a density transfer ue contempr.I.a" i""the interior of the deveropment. rn ef-fect this would redule thenumber of houses on pleasant View Road to three.
Enq in eerrs Comments dated May 18, 1981:
SLaff has always upheld theaccess to Pleasant View Road fromexj-st as a buildable lot, but siteaccess unsafe.
position that Fox path
this subdivision. Lotdistance restrictions
be the only
J OI UIOCk Z does
make pri-vate
Lot 3, Block 2 could have improved. site distance assuming somegrading and tree removal , -ply" driizeway placement on the east edge ofthe rot. The advantage of the preasani viu, access is irrri-it aiasthe effort of saving the pine tree stand on the subject lot, versusa driveway access from the Southeast.
Schoell & Madson,s Comments dated May 13, 1981:
8. Grading permit
Developer's Reque s t dated April 15, 1981:
We are unsure what constitutes a Chanhassen grading permit onour deveropment. we'.of course, have the Rirey puiqat"iy Er."r. Ivatershed -Permit_ (copy attached).. rn. faci, they have, in er r6ct, -'"ppr"i"a"i";""'- -road alignments -- one in the originai application and th!'second atthe renewar. we wirr obtain the iecessary DNR permits before grading inDNR protected land. Addirionarry, we wiri qr.al o;iy - tlrt-iropu,ty tharis common to both road ar ignmenti ' unir t that issue is settled. I.Je havea firm agreement with. an. eirth moving company, but the favorabre pricewe obtained requires that. the gradini stait in tutay. tr-,u-ei"ai.,g contractoE-wirl suppry the bond required uy the'wiiershed Di-strict tJ ir,"r." againstunwanted erosion damage .REQUEST: Permit to rough grade Fox Chase subject to:a. Terms of watershed permit, including iequired bond;b. Necessary DNR permiL;c. Not. grading area where application for street change has been madeih_r i.^r^r.-i^^!i-_
Citv
1
''i
'1
I
page -6-
Manager I s Recgmmqndation dated June 1, 1981:Deny
9. Othcr Conditions
Planning Commission Recommendations of ApriI 22, 1981?
AII Conditions previously applied and as set forth in Sectj-onI; except where in direct confl-ict with action taken thisevening, in which case the June 1, 1981 condition would apply.
Confirm or Extend Completion of Conditions by July 2L, 1981?
a
b
c
d Other Conditions which appear necessary
Schwartz' report (s) and/or other public as a result of Mrs.
comment ?
This office would recommend approval of the amended FinalPlan on the following conditions (see previous pages foron each of the following and recognize that disagreementvarious staff members) .
Manager I s Summation :
1. Number of Lots: 52
2. Street Width: 36 or 32
Reduction of Assessments: Denv
Road Alignment: Approve recognizing thconditions set by Watershed District, S(as set forth in 10b., below) will
Deve lopmen t
back g roundexists by
3
4 at
.C
ap
approval and.s., D.N.R.,
prv.etc.
5 Conservation Easement: Approve as a condition. Includesresol-ution of traiL issue with Park Commission andprevious conservation / trai I conditions as shown in 10b,below.
6. Pub1ic Improvements - Table to June 15th.
7. Access to Pleasant View and Building permit euestion:
- Approve building permit issuance for NortheasterlymostIot of plat
- No permj.t approved for Lot 19, Block 1, until plat completed.
- Lot 3, Block 2, allowed to access to pleasant View ifsite distances can be achieved
8. Grading Permit: Deny request
9. Other Conditions :
a. Planning Commission recommendations deemed advisabl-eby Council,
b. AII conditions as applied in JuIy of 1980 and as set forthin Section I of this report.
Ipage -7-
c Counc i I
Counc i 1
decision.
decision.d
CITY OF
ffiEflAi{Eflfr$$Hffi
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX ,I47 . CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(6r2) 937-1900
MEMORAND UM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
DP.
I tcm
May 28, 1981
Don Ashworth, city I\,tanager
BiIl Monk, City Engineer
Fox Chase Grading Plan
The grading plan as submitted by the developer is unacceptablebecause of an inadequate cross-section r{herein no provision rsmade for grading the boulevards. A proposed cross-sectj.ondetail, as prepared by this office, is attached for review.The reasons for gradj-ng the entire right-of-way are to controlerosion, provide an area for snow storage, and standardizethe street section throughout the City. I am aware thatthis does increase the area of land disturbed and the numberof trees to be removed, but I recolunend the City Councifnot waive this requirement.
Both the straight and curved alignment plans require ex-tensive grading throughout the plat but especially alongthe western slope where the excavation does reach 20' inisolated areas. The amount of sj-te grading being proposedis not unusual but will requj-re strict attention to the
maintenance and possible expansion of the erosion controls.
In comparj-ng the two plans, the quantity of overall sitegrading required is substantially less on the curved align-ment. fhis is due almost entirely to the reduction of sub-
grade correction necessary because this plan allows for move-
ment of a portion of the roadway and some house pads out of
an area of poor soils. It should be noted that the finalquantity of grading and corresponding area to be disturbedwiII only be determined. when the extent of subgrade excavationis established during the actual grading operation.
The developer's engineer has computed earthwork quantities
for site development. They are as follows:
S tra i ght
Al ionment.
Curved
Al ignment
-*ril*J-
Cornmon Excavation
Subcut Excavation
r30,000
22,000
99,000
r0,000
o
o
.J
,;
(i
!
b
o
+
Elo
(D
E
F
o
o
I'o
=l
@
zo
U)
UJo
F
LJ
UJc(F
U)
z
@Ef
b
h
ciol-
z
-F
II
9 d!
t lo
E @Goo
@
5
o
o-oF
;<
1Lr
6(/,
p>
(D trt
J
E
FFl
6
@El
ozo
o
F
E
o;
6;
Z^
soo
+
o
?
-l
.!'
c
Rilel'- Purgatory Creeli \\'atershed District
8950 COUNTY ROAD :d
EDEN FRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55343
Mr. creg Kopishke
llestL,ood Planning and Engineering
7 415 wayzata Boulevard
Minneapolis, Uinnesota 55426
Re: Site Grading for the Sunrise
Beach DevelopmenE: Chanhassen
Dear Mr. Kopishke;
Ttre Board of Managers of the Riley-Purgatory Creek Iratershed District
has reviewed the plans and grading and land alteration permit application
for sice grading for the Sunrise Beach DevelopEent in Chanhassen. The
Ilanagers are extrerDely concerned with the steep grades on the development
site and u-iII require a conElnuous insPection of the proposed erosion con-
trol neasures to ensure that Ehey are properly maintained and functional
until the aliered areas on the site have been restored' To ensure that
the erosion control Eeasures are proPerly Eaintained, the District will-
require that the developer post a performance bond or letter of security
in the auounE of $20,000 prior to the couDencement of land alteraEion.
lrith the above noted, the l'lanagers approve of the grading and land
alteraEion perroit for site grading on this developrnent subject to the
following condj.tlons:
fhe Distrlct will require that all erosion conErol Eeasures, i.e.,
staked hay bales reinforced \.,ith snow fence, be installed prior to
the co'Emencemen! of land alteration and be oaintained until all
areas alEered on the site have been restored. Once these erosion
control measures have been installed, the Districtrs engineering
advisor must be notified prior to the coEmenceDenE of land altera-
tion. Land alteration cannot begin until a fj.eld insPectj.on of
the erosion control measures has been made by Ehe District rs
engineering advisor.
I
The DisErict will require Ehat the tuo cenporary sedinenEation basins
to be locatcd along the north-south roadvay be constructed at the
initial stages of grading operatlons and renain functional during
the site grading portion of the Project.
llay 6, 19 80
7,"
f-------'7
(-
The areas
lrith seed
t 980.
!lr, Creg Kopishke
Page 2
Yr)' 6, 1980
2 Due to the altcration of steeP slopes on the site and the Potential
of a serlor,rs erosion problern occurrlng if erosion control measures
are not properly maintained, the developer must posE a performance
bond or letter of security in the amounE of $20,000 prior to the
com.mencement of land alteration. This security rDust be submitted
and approved by the Districtrs 1ega1 advisor. If needed, lhis
perforruance bond wlIl enable the District to resEore altered areas
or Eo install additlonal erosion control aeasures Eo protect the
public waters of the District from areas that have not been restored.
AIl areas altered due to slte grading with the exception of the
street rights-of-way, must be restored wi.th seed and mulch and,/or
sod within 2 r.reeks froE the cornpletion of land alteration or no
IaEer than Septernber I, 1980.
Those areas altered with a sl-ope of 3:I or greater must be restored
with sod or wood fiber blanket within 2 weeks from the completion
of land alteration or no later than September I, 1980.
3
(
altered within the street riBhts-of-way uust be restored
and nulch and,/or sod or be hard surfaced by September 15,
A A deEailed storxo sewer plan EusE be subDitted to the District for
review and approval. If stormwater is to be discharged to Lotus
Lake, an MDNR Chapter I05 ilork in ?ublic tJaters Permit. will be
requj"red.
The 100-year flood elevation of l,otus Lake is 899, The District
will require chat all hooes to be construcEed adjacent to the Iake
have ruinimum basement floor elevations 2 feet above this 1.00-year
flood elevation.
you have any questlons regarding the Districtrs comnents, please
us ar 920-0655.
Sin cere
5
If
contact
v,
Ro C. Oberteye
BARR ENGINEERING CO.
Engineers for the Dis t rict
Approved by the B a rd
EK
of Irana ge rs
ERSHED DISTRICT-PI.IRGRCO/ r11
cc: Mr.
Mr.
f'),nConrad Fiskness
Frederick Richards
Bob Weibel
Date:
Secrerary
st ac 3J9
i,1 ,0 irr.rnce Av..,nrre Sorith
lrl ir:a, Ii'i nrrcs6Lit \51,)5
x I I.i:I- PURC,i'i( ) :(Y CRELI: U..'i'l i: RSll I:D l)1 STP. lCT
GRADI C r'c;t) E/,R'iiDlOv INC I,iitwtT
Appl ication for pcrrnlt, perroit, notificifion (,f cornplc!ion
and certific:!tion of cornplc!lon
Name of Applicnt t!ggj4_!aI4_!g!DAny
Ad<lress
Na ture
I770 She 1a rd Toryer llinneapolis,Telephone 546 -ZZj 6I'1N 5r426
of liork Cradinq oF a sinqle famil Y subdivision 27! a IES
Locacion of I'rork !lest of and ad.j acent Lo Lotus Lake
ltunicipality Chanhassen, [linnesota
Proj ec Eed Duration of llo
Procedures To Bc Used to
rk J months
Control Erosion and S edimen ta t -ion StraU bale dikesas necessary durin construcLion;seed or sod as necessat ermanentcover an er os 10n con ro
If additional space is needed to provide the information requested above, attach
the information to this application and in the space below brlefly describe the
at Eaclrrnents.
no(&o
DaEeAuthori zed nt
Applicant
tlestr:rood PIann tllj--q-I9r_..1
received by the l^latershed DisErict on the 25
E9 gl-i-ltg
- !_oiP_e ! r_
day of FebruaryPernit application
1980.
AIl. r.,ork slra11 be courpleted by
nature of collateral req uired
15 day of Septeurber, 19€0. The anounE and
s20,000
the Board of llanagers of
19t0, subject Eo Ehe condi-
May 7, 1'980'
the
is
This permit application is hereby (;-niY'-l /aPJ' roved ) by
the l.toEershad District this .7 day of May '
tions contained ln the attached correspondence dated
This permit is permissive only and does noL release the permlEtee
licy or obligation lmposed by MinnesoEa SE Ees, Fede Lnw r.r
froo any liabi-
locaI ordinances.
Board of llanage rs
llotice
hereby
of: completion of work aurhorized ; expirat.ion of gr:rding perait
given Lo Ehc Dis tric t on lhis _ d.y of _, 19_.
l'ermirtee
is
Ce rt if lca tion of
tlris _ day of
tlre satisfactory conrpletlon of work authorlzed is lrereby oade on
l9_.
Inspector
f or .
Riley- Purgatory Creeli Watershed Districl
trD
8950 COUNTY FIOAC l
EOEN PRAIRIE. MINNESOTA 5534
Ilarch 4, l9 81
Mr. Fran Ilagen
Westwood Planni.ng & Engineerj.ng
7415 Wayzata Boulevard
tl.inneapolis, Ltlnnesota 55426
Re: PenoiE Extenslon Request - Sunrise Beach,/
Iox Chase DevelopmenE: Chanhassen
Dear Mr. Ilagen:
The Board of Managers of the R-lley-Purgatory Creek Watershed DlsErlct
has reviewed the revised plans and request of January 27, l98l for an exEension
of the District's Bradlng and land alteration perrit for the Sunrise Beach/
Iox Chase DevelopmenE ln Chanhassen, The }lanagers approve the pernit extenslon
request unEil Septernber 15, 1981 subject to the follor,rlng condltions:
Because of the alteration of steep slopes on the slte and the potentlal
of a serious erosion problem occurring if erosion control measures
are no! properly [aintained, the developer must post a performanee
bond or letter of security ln the amount of $20,000 prior to the
comrencemenE of land alleration. This security mus! be subuiEted
and approved by the Districtrs il€ga1 advisor. If needed, this
perforroance bond wilJ. enable the District to restore altered areas
or to install additional erosion control measures to protect thepublic waters of the Dlstrict from areas that have noE been reslored.
The DistrlcE requires that addltional erosion control Eeasures, 1.e.,
staked hay bales reinforced with snow fence, be lnstalled betlreen the
proposed sedlmentatlon basin and Lotus Lake. These eroslon control
measures must remain in place until all altered areas have been
res tored.
A detailed storm sever plan must be subnitted to Che Distrlct for
review and approval.
2
(
3
\
]. All conditions st.ipulated in the DistrlcErs orlginal correspondenceof ll,ay 5, 1980 remaln applicable.
4
Mr. Fran Ilagen
Page 2
Ilarch 4, l98l
AIl areas altered because of slte gradlng uust be resEored lrlth seed
and dlsced nrulch, or sod, or wood fiber blanket, or be hard surfaced
withln 2 geeks afLer conpletion of land alt.eration or no laEer than
September f5, I98I .
A11 altered areas lriEh a slope of 3:
with sod or wood fi.ber blanket withl
land alteratlon.
I'rederick Richards
Irederick Rahr
Don Ashuorth
Date :
r greater Dus! be restored
ueeks after completlon of
resident
_, //l ,/
Io
t2
I
6 Ihe District must be notified 48 hours Prior to connencement of land
alteration.
If you have any questions regarding the District's comnents, please
call us at 920-0655.
-Sincerely,-\ . ! ,- -. /\ / /,. ,' t/.,.; -;/ / ,/, -y':,,(. ( (irr,t,,r.1
Robert C. Obermever
BARR TNGINEIRING CO. '
Engineers for the District
Approved by the Board of Managers
RILEY-PURGATORY CREEK IiATERSHID DISTI1ICTRCO/ 111
c: Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
C
(,
-
Page 4
P lanning Commi ss i on Heetinq
lle rr i ck
Reoues ted that the Planning Commiss.i on consjderthe soil condi ti ons in the subject area. The wateris just below the surface in the meadow area.Hrs . Schwartz Dresented a map showi ng the high watertabl es in the past. The nei ghbors aa ked thaa Hr.
Mon k, the Ci t.y Engi neer, ta ke a closer 'l ook at theDroDerty.
6 It was brought up thehave not been noti fi ed
the DNR and the Corp of Engineersand that they should be notifjed.
7 The nei ghbors
reinstated.also req ues ted that the 0ut lot area be
- John Edwards, a neighboring oroperty owner,in the past he felt that the neighboring oropertyhad been i gnored. The plan apor6ved 2 !ears agothen 50 uni ts then 5Z uni ts. Mr. Edwaris statad
i nd icated that
owners reouest
had 49 unitsthat theDroDerty coul d be wei 1 p.1 atted wi thou t destroyi ng the areamgy.be_if 'l ess density. Mr. Edwards also exor6ssid hr's conce.nw'rth t-ox path dead ending into the adjoining oroperty.
,,Mr. 14aibel suggested to the Commission that Fox pathcout0 be made to stop 30 _ 40' from the prooerty line andDut a cul -du-sac on it.
Mr. Jim l.leyer, neighbor,in the subject property. Nr.
I ooked at the soil and it wasbui ldable and that it was not
indicated concern overDerri ck replied that hpossible to make alI oa compl i cated process.
the
e hadf the
Mr. Derri ck in rep)y to the nei ghbors Drevious list ofre0uests indicated that he had tried-to wori< wrtir itre ,"rghuo.r.Mr' -Derrick exprained the he had changed the prui i"o,n sq';"it,to 52 uni ts, removed the outr ot and cfranged tne-roaa. ai t
- ,,.lots are over the l5,0rlO square foot-minimum tot;i;;,;h;reou es t that Fox Path be made smarrer was agreeabr e wi th Derrick.
. _Mr. l.J. Thomoson stated that 2 years ago the feel i ng ofthe Planninq commission was that in" ihe-fuIure ihe-p.opE.ivshould have a second access and also iequested a 36" wi atf.,'in order tha t the road vrourd have i-rui.tv zone before enteringPl easant View Road. At that time ifreie-was a recommendationthat having Fox Path on the east oro o e ity be I ooked jnto.11r. r'J. Thomoson i ndi cated it'ii-i"b*-iii 'ir,,. ."iponr" iio, il,"crov/d that there needs to be more changes and that ihi s j temcannot be recommended to the City Counii,l yet.
lrr. Jim 0rr, from Schoell & l,ladson, indicated that thesecond access will end up cutti ng down some trees and therewill be a g rade Drobt em. Fox paih *it t
-t ur. uUout OO,
-piuifo.,
be fo re enteri ng Pleasant View Road, both views of the roadare reasonable. If Fox path were moved to the eas t, it would
5
soi l
I ots
CITY JF
PLANNING REPORT
DATE: Apri l 17, I98.l
T0: Planning Commission & Staff
FR0l4: Bob Waibel, Cjty Planner
SUBJECT: Final Devel opment Plan
Addi ti on, Derri ck
APPL ICANT: Derri ck Land Company
PLANNING CASE: P-6.l4
The curv i ng of the street named'I /3 of the devel opment.
ffiH'f,rffEflffiffi$Hffi
7610 LAREDO DRIVE ' P.O. BOX 147 O CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
The app li cant has subm i tted the attach ed orooosed final devel-
9pm9nt plan for Fox Chase Revi sed Anri I .l5, l98l for the
!yUt]c Hearing for the Planning Commission Meeting on Aorjl
22., .1981.. The major changes between this and the previously
re v i ewed nl ans are:
Amendment Request, Fox Chase
" Fox Path" in the nonthernI
3
4
The proposal for lot l, Bl ock I and Lot 3
h ave di rect acces s on Pl easant Vi ew Road.
Bl ock 2 to
The remova I of theo0en space.
previously proposed outlot/common
The relocation of the poi nt fromconnect from the i nteri or streettween Lots l2 & l3 of Bl ock I.
where the trai l willto the I akeshore be-
5. The reduction in the number of lots from 54 to 52 asrecommended by the City Counci l.
The fol l owi ng are the comments of thi s offi ce reqardi nq thepoi nts raised in the Apri l I5, I981 I etter from Roqer ijerr j ckto the 14ayor and Counci I . Addi ti onal staff comments to thesepoi nts are i ncl uded in the City Engi neers report.
(
L
2
P-61
Page
n
?
Derri ck
l Number of Iots
A
tt
c
'I
m
T
m
3. Previousl
t.any-time throughout the rev i ew of the sub.ject Droposalhis offi ce does not reca l 1 any of the o'l ans showing morehan 55 uni ts. It was nresumei that the aool i cant 6ada'l culated.the pendino 69 unit assessment .i nto hisand use deve I opmen t Drooos a l s and choie to follow aarket that u/ould serve I ower density, l arger lot develooment,his is understandably oual i fi abl e ai -to
wh en the aooiicaniade his initial assessment search on the Droperty.
In .determi ni ng the Land Use densi tv for devel opments ,and especi a1ly in the case of planned Resi dentiui Oevet-opment Districts, there is the need to make certainjudgemental deci sions i ncl udi nq envi ronmenta.l concerns,and reasonable density standard. The planning Corriiiio,and Cit.y Council in oievious reviews, althouqh notsneci fi cal ly mentioning envi ronmentai constrii nts ofthe.subject property, did, based uoon the informationava'r labte to them, fi nd the orooosa l acceotabl e at 49and 52 I ots resoectably. At this time, this officefeels that the Final DLvel onment Oens iiv rel ati ve iothe 69 units assessed.is not germane to the planning
Commission consideration and it is recommended thai"thePl anning Commjssion not act to change the gross densi tyestablished by the City Counci'l until so iistructea-Uy'the Counci l.
?. Street l,l i dthStaff had re comme nde d that the 36 f ootFox Path in order to mi ti gate the sof the subject oroperty. flo change
ingl
is
vridth street fore a cces s situation
recommended.
I n s t a I I ed A s s e s sments
Th.i s ssue to be discussed wl th thePl anni ng Commission action necessarv
City Counci l.. tloat thi s ti me.
o ropo s ed al ignment of Foxthe devel opment. Thischanqe orovi ded said re-standards acceptabl e to the
4. Road Ali nmentrs ls tn re
5. Conservation Ea
erence to thePath in the northerly l/3 ofoffi ce endorses the -orooosed
al i enment is constructed toCit-v Engineer.
sement
Th
PI
L.l
ha
a'l
vri
th
su
e City, in artnrovaT of nrevious subdivjsions andanned Residential Devel ooment Districts, i.e. Lotuske Estates, Pi ce Marsh Hanor, and Rei chert Addition,ve pl aced conservati on easements prohibiting stiuiitirat '
terations to the lakeshores, The'assistant City Attorney'I I be oresent [,Jednesday eveninq to exnlajn in aLtjite p lacement of conservlti on eaiements as part ofbdi vi sion aoproval s.
P-61
Page
4,
3
De rri ck
Imorovementso be di scussed between Derrick
Counci l. No Planning Commi ssi on
Land Comp a ny and theacti on necessary.
6. Public
T City
7. Buildin
A
p
a
b
h
p
Itf
u
r
s
Permi ts stated oreviously, the northeasterly most pro_osed lot is oroposed to have di rect access to pleasant.iew Road. Due to the grade differential betvreen thjs lotnd Fox Path, this offige !gs no probl ems wi th issuing a -
uilding permit aften the fi nal devel opment pl an approvatas been given by the Cjty Counci 1. As to a'buildingermi t on the s outh ea s terl y 1ot (proposed Lot .l9, Block .l
)feel that a building permit stroutd'noi be issued untilhe City has recei ved an executed deve l opment contractron the applicant that vrould assure thai the schedule ofork would nroceed in an order th at woul d not nresent anndue del ay between the time that an occupancy permi i woul aequested and the time in which the road Ued wolta Uetabi I i zed and/or base course of asohalt be instal led
be
8. Grading Permi t
CoveiEd-- n-T-iTy Engineers commen ts.
As. stated oreviously, one of the ma,ior changes to the developersexhi bi ts has been the remova l of the outlot access: ng the-iitefrom Fox Path. The orevious confi gurati on of the ouit oi shovredit to be travers i ng a wetl and area vrith marqinal attri Oute iorhome ownens associ ati on usage. Additionally mu ch of ttre pro_
oos ed outlot area was to be utilitized for a drai naqe and'sedimentation basin. This office sees no orobl.* *iif,r if,r.removal of said outlot si nce l) it had dubious oual i ti es forthe estab li shment of a common area, 2) the Chanhassen pirk pl anis des i gned to a deq ua te 1y orov i de the recreati ona I needs ofthe community: 3) The City Engineer wil l require the dedicationof oroper uti 1i ty & drainage iasements for the sedimenIation basin.
Another change to the apol i cants exhi bi ts is that the trai leasement from Fox Path to Lotus Lake has been moved to an areabetrveen Lots l2 & I3 of Block l. I find that this is an oven-all i morovemen t to the p'l an in that it traverses areas of soilsmore sui tabl e to de ve loomen t of said trail. The deve I oper hasresponded to the nei ghborhood concern in preservi ng the standof Pine trees on the northwesterl.v most oorti on of the subjectpr0Derty throuqh a proposal to have Lot 3, Bl ock 2 acces s directlyonto Pleasant Vierv Road. lleveloper has indicated that thisconfiquration r.ril I permit the ol acement of residential structuresand dri veways that will minjmize the removal of said trees. Asyou knorv, this orotion of the subject nronert.v has extrenrely poorsight distance characteristjcs on pleasant Vibrv Road. S.i ncLthe preservatjon of th is stand of trees is qui te appropri 61s 16 the
-
P-6.l4,
Page 4
Derri ck
character of the deve I opmen t and
des i gn is paramount, this offi cebe mi ti gated ei ther by a densityport i on of the proposed p1at.
As to the i ssue of secondary access,feels that the previous fi ndi ngs thamarginal benefi t remains vajid.
that subdivision safety
recommends that thi s probl emtransfer of Lot 3 to another
In conversations wi th various property owners near the sub.iectproperty, I have been asked to comment on the extention of'theright of way of Fox Path to the westerly property line, ind thepossibility of secondary access from thL i u b j e c t- ,
"
o p . i ty tothe south.ln discussions with the attorneys oifice, it-wa"s iounato be acceptab'l e to withdraw the dedicatLd rigfrt of way 4O,to 50'from.the western property rine provided that i prinnin"q aireementbe filed at the Carver County p,ecorders office stating'thitthe adjoininq Iots (Lot ZZ, -B1ock 2 and Lot 30, Block"l ) woufawaive any acquisition fees to the City if exteniion oi saiari ght of way i s needed i n the future.
the City En-qineer,t that access would
Bill Monk,
be of
I recommend that the Plannilg Commission recommend that the CityCounci 1 approve the Final Deve I opmen t plan of Oerri ct LindComnany in accordance wi th previ ous City Counci I aoprovi I ofJu Iy 1980 wi th the addi ti onal condi ti on that the density transrerfor Lot 3, Block 2 be incorporated into the Fina'l prat wiit ma.i n-tain ', as best oossible, the integrity of the stand of treesin the northwest portion of the oroier"ty.
l'lanager I s Corun ent s
PubIic Improvemen ts:Mr. Derrickrs letter makes several
A copy of the City Council minutes of April Z (preliminarvDevelopment pl-an Approvar) as wel,1 as ii,iv-zi i;,;;il;;;iopmentPlan Approval) are enclosed.. this office would recommend thatany action on this item include not only the conditio'i -of -tni_"
amended approval, but also the conditioi" ." established forthe original plat in Apri1 and July of I9g0.
requests in regards to a 'betition for public improvements,,,"ordering feasibility study,', "specific method aid years ofassessment", etc. Given the length of this agenda-, this officewould recommend that discussion and action on-these typesof issues be tabled to a future meeting.
Location and Construction of Trail:As shown in the planningreport. of JuIy 17, L9A0 (item number 2) ttre previous approvalencompassed specific requi.rements as welr as optional constructiontechniques for the trail through the proposed development.As resubmitted, a third potentiat location has now been defined.It is recommended that any approval be conditioned upon theapplicant resolving this issue rrith the PIannj-ng Comrnission and
.t, t
-;tha t
any
mu st
City Council concurrence and/or modification ofagreement between the developer and park Commissionoccur prior to submission of the preLiminary plat.
p"
1l
Page 3
Planning Commission
Prvzmus
lleetinq
r,,ls. l^latsonto read that theparking and s omeSix membe rs aye,
made a moti on to amend the oreviousDriving Ran!e shall orovi de l5 of fon s treet oarkingr. Second by Mr.J. Thornpson ooooied.
motion
street
Noziska.
Fi nal Devel oom ent Pl an Amendment Reouest,Fox Chase Addi ti on.
i
I
I
I
Derri ck:
[1r . l,l a i
Commission,
mi tted (see
read the Sta
prev iously i
easement, pu
be1 presented the PIanni ng Renort to the planninglisting the 5 changes froi the orevi ous pl ans su5_P Ianni ng Reoort Apri 1 l7, I q8l ). Hr. Uai bel alsof ts comments on the number of lots, s t reet width,nstal Ied assessments, road al ignment, conservati onbl ic imorovements, bui ldi ng nerii ts and qradi nq oermi ts,
X,
.. 14".. Partridge indicated to the pranninq commission thatthe number of assessments and the Dubr i c imorovem"nir-u..'i-function of the citv councir and that the piunning iorriirionshould let them act on those items.
- .llr. Derri ck, the aool i cant, exolained to thCornmission that if the road was changed he wouldsome.Maple trees and uiould have to s6ave groundto fil1, or if the road was moved it woull makeand les s desi rab le. Mr. Derri ck has reduced his54 units to 52 units.
z, a neighboring nroperty ou,ner.gotten together and met wi th Mr.o u p0n / Dot nts that they wouldning Commi ssi on at this iime:
f'!rsthat theand the
e Planning
h ave to removerather than2 Iots smallerplans f rom
stated
Derri ck
I i keto bri ng
2
3
4
I
. Kath"v Schr,rart
neiohbors hadnei ghbors agree
up to the Plan
They woul d ii ke tand they don't liView Road.
ol at drawi ng wi th 52 units
dens i ty c lose to Pleasant
o see a
ke such
0n the-first pl an Mr. Derri ck had prooosed 3 lotsalong Pleasant View Road novr he is presenting 41ots.The neighbors would like to propose that he ieturnto his first proDosal of 3 I ots al ong pleasant View.
Regardi ng the access to pleasant View Road _ neighborsreoues t that Fox Path be moved to the East oroneityI jne for safety purposes.
the width
wi dth of
It was reoues ted that Mr. Derrick chanqeof Fox Path from 36, to 2g' to match tirePleasant View Road.
Pag'e 5
Pl anni ng Commi ssi on Hi nutesDerrick
create a site probl em to the east.the east is an economi c orobl em.
Not changi nq the road to
road
wi I I
llr. M. Thomp
on 1y ones who are
Bennett property.
proposed Fox Path
brought up to endput a cul-du-sac
wi de for the reasroad. 1"1r. Pl . Thoher concerni ng FoBennett answered
Ms. l atson asked how the o latform wiII I ook, wiII thednop off on both sides? Mr. Orr i ndi cated ihat the ioaddrop off some but the looks w.ill be alr.i ght.
a
Mr
in
_ 1"1r, M.. Thompson indicated that Mr. Derrick has proposed10,8 grade level on Fox Path with a 3% grade on the piatiorm.. Monk qxpl a i ned that there is a maximui 7% grade 1eve1the ordinance. The 7il is for safety in the winter t.ime.
son ask
i n f avMr. t,l
on that
that wthe ro
on i t.
ed 14r. tlaibel if the staff were theor of the deadend street i nto theaibel i ndi cated tha t Mr. Derri ck haday and that only 1ate1y was .it everad 30- 40 ' from the property 1i ne andFox Path was recommended to be 36'that the road is a long sisked Mrs . Bennett if anyone
ending on her property l ine
mpson ax Path
no.
ngl e
had. 1,4
access
approached
r5.
Mr. Frank Kurvers , a property owner, as ked about theout lot and the s ed i ment pond , what is goi ng on wi th this .i tem?Mr. Waibel i ndi cated that the pond is ieq u i red for run off.Mr. Monk expl ai ned that the outl ot is not requi red for drai nagebut the outlot was to be for the property owners in Fox Chasein order that they cou ld alI have use of'the 'l ake. The sedimentpon d is a di fferent thi ng. Mr. Curt Laughinghouseitive for Mr. Derri ck, stated that initiitty tpond was pl anned to be in the outlot. The outl6tfor recreational use. Now the proposal is that thpl aced in the backyard of the lake front lots andhas been disgarded.
a represent-
e sediment
as olanned
pond be
he outl ot
h
et
Mr. Kurvers asked if all of the work on the I ake shorewas going to damage the soil and if there would be any runoff'i nto the I ake. Ms. Watson asked Mr. Derri ck if he understoodthat 20' al ong the I a kes hore was to be des i gnated to the cityfor a Conservati on Easement. Mr. Derr.i ck answered that thiswas the first he knew that the easement was to be a long the'I akeshore. Ms. l^lats on asked why no docks were permitted.Mr. Craig Mertz, the City Attorney, explained that the ConservationEasement fjrst came up when the Park & Recreati on Commissionconsidered the sketch plan on March 20, 1979. They recommendedthe Conservati on Easement and throuqh the develonment processit vras req u i red to have a Conservati on Easement, That wasj ncornorated into the City Counci 1s aoprova I of the olat .i nJuly of .l 980. The Conservati on Easement that aDn li es tothi s communi ty means that you can't di q on the Iake shore orfil1 on the I akeshore, you can't cut the veqitation and youcan't construct structures on the I a keshore, if you can't con-
Paqe 5
Planning Commi ss i on Meeti ng
De rri ck
struct structures that means no docks. Mr. l,laibel indicatedthat on the pl ans the Conservation Easement .i s shown to stirtbetween Lots l2 and l3 and then al ong the I akeshore. Thetltility Easement and the Conservat.ion Easement are in thesame p1ace. Mr. Derri ck i ndi cated tha t he is agai nst theconservation Easement if it prevents the l akeshore home ovrn e rsfrom havi ng docks.
Mr. Derri c k ex
ro ad (Fox Path
I ai ned to
r"iou I d bewould create a lot with'I ot undes i rabl e. Theretaken down and it would
Ms. Nancy 0sborne, aover Fox Path. She feel sbe enough of a run to make
Mr. I,J. Thomoson made
Second by Mr. L. Conrad.
opposed.
the Planning Commission that if themoved to the east nroDerty Iine it2 road si des and that woul d ma ke theare nice trees that woul d have to bemean an extra 100 feet of sewer and road.
prope rty owner, expressed concernthat in the wi nter there will notit up Pleasant Vi ew Road.
p
)
a moti on to close theVote: 6-ayes, 1-nay.
Heari ng.
Thompson
i ng ande up tothat
Thompsonsponsibilitythis
Publ i cMr. M
Mr. Me rtz expl ai ned th at the p lanni ng I tems that thePlanning Commission should discuss and reiommend to the aityCouncil are the street width, Znd access, road al.i gnment, --
number of I ots and the Conservati on Ea semen t, The-rest ireAdmi ni strati on i tems such as bui I di ng oermi ts , previ"rttv installedassessments, gradi ng and publ i c improvements.
l'!r. J Thom
movi ng of landl2' in height.this proces s isstates that asto the peop I e wshould be lookethat he likes a
coul d take outconsideration f
suggested that
wi dth of the rois necessary.
pso
eas
Th
th
the
hodi
co
I ot
n expressed concern of all the ft of Fox Path that is proposed te Planning Commission has been te prob lem of the bui I der but Mr.Planning Commission they have aare going to buy the propertv, a
it'lob
ol d
J.
re
nd
or
the
ad
nto more c a refu l1y. Mr. J. Thompson indicatedmbination of the last two prooosa)s, maybe26 of Exhi bi t A and make tha t for futuiean easement to the south. Mr. J. Thompsonroad be curved more qent ly and the 32,was expressed. The Conservati on Easement
Page 7
P lanni nq Commission l,,linutes
Derri ck
'I &
to
of
l'1r.
ao
52
is it
than
f eel s
be a
i dea
'I ots
Itr. Ladd Conrad indicated that he would l.i ke to see Lots2 of Section 2 ta ken out and make the road access furtherthe east. He likes the i dea of an outl ot to the souththe proposed property until a road access is necessary.Conrad fel t that the cul-du-sac is imoortant and the aor 32' street width is acceotable. He would Iike to seeI ots i nstead of the 54 presented on the fj rst plan.
Mr. H. Nozi ska stated that he is concerned about the Iandbui Idabl e? Also, he fel t that there are to many unitsthere should be comoared to the terrain of the Iind. Hethat 36' street wi dth is reasonabl e because there won,tsecondary access for some time. Mr. Noziska Iikes theof the Conservati on Easement and feel s that the number" ofshoul dn't be more than 52 units.
14s. ldatson i ndi cated that she woul d I i ke to see a secondaryaccess maybe in the south, coul d be us ed as an outlot untilneeded as an access, and fel t that a 28, or 32, street wi dthwas acceotable. Ms. l.latson felt that the road should be movedover to the east not only for the reason tha t the s treet wouldhave better sight but the g rade is better to the eas t. Ms.Hatson is very much in favor or the Conservation Easement andwould Iike to see the outlot back again. l,ls. l,latson expressedconcern for the movement of alI the dirt in the area, who r.ri l lorotect the Iake and what will nrevent the I a kes hore own e rs f romdumoi ng thei r ferti I i zer i nto the lake as eros i on occurs.
Mr.. Mike Thomoson indicated that he woujd like to preservethe meadow and feel s that there are better way s of olanningthis olat. 1,1r. M. Thompson stated that the environmental -
imoact of this area is fair'l y good. This proposal .is not inkeeoing with the oarticular area. Mr. tr,t . ihoinpson expressedhis concern for all the movi ng of d.i rt , demucki ng and fillingand is concerned for the effect on the I ake. He-would liketo see the access moved to the eas t tthe sight is poor. Mr. M. Thomoson dvridth, too wi de, and the grade standatoo steeD of a road. He also i ndi cat
that the r.rhol e I ot wsoil. The muck is t
comoacted and then flots because of the
hilI is to steep andnot like the 36' streetare vi ol ated by havingthat he did not like
e bui I dabl e, f ill it wi th properut and repl aced wi th good soil. thenagain if needed. Have to raise thetabl e and to keep the grades dor.rn.
heid
rds
edthe idea of Lot 3, Bl ock 2 access on to pleasant View Road.He expressed his mj xed feel i nqs about the Conservati on Easement,if a I akeshore owner should be abl e to have a dock or not.Hr. M. Thompson i ndi cated that he does not like the 52 unitswould rather see 35 but 52 have been approved. lt!r. l\4. Thompson
as ked hor,r a lot is made buildable, woul d they have to denruckthe vrhol e 'l ot or just the bu il d.i ng si te? Mr. Derri ck stated
ou I d b
aken o
i 1 I ed
v/ater
Mr. Jim iileyer asked if any building permits could be
i ssued before the Final Pl at aoorova l? Mr. lrertz indicated
"...:Et-
.. - Mr. J-. Thompson stated that wi th 52 I ots and l ooki ng atthe lay of the I and in keepi ng wi th the rura.l a""u in'inis-part of Chanhassen Mr. Derrick could develope thi; i;n;;;.yattractively without al1 the grading by utiiizing-ttre iomUi'nationor clustering.and single famiiy homes. He feeli-'tri.i in.-property would be more desirabie and energy efficieni anJwou ld be a real p lus for Ch anhas sen. Mr, -Lonrad aifea if Ur.Derri ck was beyond the poi nt of chanq.i ng his ptani. -N..
Derri ck s tated th at he has been worki ng-on this pl at for along time and that any other city that"he has woi-t<eJ in f.,isnot had to make thi s many change!. llhen Nr. oerriiI b;r;[;the land he looked at it before and had investigatea;h;; -
could be done with the property. The city has i...rr.J-if,"property as 69 uni ts.
Page 8
Pl anni ng Commi ssi on Mi nutesDerri ck
th at one building permi tno more than that.could be issued as one Iarqe lot but
fee I that the'I ots is qui te an
Ea s emen t and feel s
Commission
Mr, Art Partri dge i nd i cated tha t heremoval of the out l ot and maki ng it intoi mo rovemen t. He is for the Cons6rvati onthat a southerly access is important.
. - Mr. l.I. Thomoson i ndi cated that the planning
shoul d get a consensus on the i tem presented.
Itt. J . Thompson made a moti on to recommendCounci I that Fox Chase access onto pl eaiant Viewmoved to the eas terl y property Iine. Second by6 ayes, Mr. Noziska nay. pasied.
to the City
Road be
Ms. l,latson.
Mr. H. Noziska made a motion that the planning Commissionacce pt the proposal to make a curb cut on to pl easait View-Roaafrom Lot 3, Block 2 as shown on Exhibit A. seionJ uv'w-ir-,o.pron,Itlr. lloziska, Mr. l,. Thompson, Mr. L. Conrad _ ay;, M;. !,la;;;n,Mr. J. Thompson, Mr. M. Thompson, Mr. pirtridge'-'nuv. Fuii.a.
Mr. L. Conrad made a moti on to decrease the p ropos ed roadwidth from 36' to 32,. _Second by I,tr. M. Thompion. -!-_-iv"i,
Mr, Noziska and Mr. J. Thompson l nay. passed:
Mr. H. Nozi s ka made a moti on that the pl anni nq Commissionadopt the street alienrent of Exhiuii A-suujeii t.'il. ii".imotion. ubgyt movi ng the cu rb cut east and no u.."ir.i-f.or- -
any 1 o t s.. d i r e c t 1 y
. o n Pleasant V i er^r Road. seconJ iv-lrr. tiatson.5 ayes, I'1r. Conrad - nay, Mr. J. Thompson sustajned. passed.
Page 9
Planning Commission Mi nutes
Derri ck
11s. I.,la ts on ma
request that the d
wi dth between Lotsaccess. Second byMr. Partri dge, Mr.
de
eve
a motion that the Planninq Commission
I oper dedi cate a right of way 50, in& 27, Block I for possible futur e 2nd. M. Thompson. 5 aye, Mr. Noziska,
Thompson - nay. Passed,
?6
Mr
I^l.
Mr. Conrad made a moti on that we maintain the ConservationEasement' this conservati on Easement will not allow the al ter-ati on of Iakeshore and instalIation of structures includingprivate docks. Second by Mr. Nozi ska. 6 - ayes , Mr. N. iiompsonnay. Passed.
. , l,lf . J. Thompson made a motion that the developer be requiredto dedi cate a trail easement originating on the southerly lineof the plat within the Utility eisement'commensing at tfresoutherly edge of the property and lying northerly to the south'I ine of Lot .l2, Block I according to f xfr iUit A and running
wes te r1y at that Doi nt to tts poi nt of .i ntersecti on of FoiPath as des i gnated in Exhi bi t A trence conti nuing northeriy withthe right of way of Fox Path to i ntersecti on of-pleasanl ViewRoad. Mr. W. Thomoson seconded the moti on. A'l I in favor.
l'1r..J. Thompson made a moti on that the planning
recommend to the City Council that the 0utlot may bei nto the i ndi vi dual properti es is snown
-
i n Exh.i bi t Athey have virtually no utility as an 0utlot. SecondNoziska. All in favor.
Mr, l,l , Thompson made a moti on that the pl annirecommend to the City Council that the Exhibit A.be accepted but the Planning Commissions recommend
ng
(q
dL
Commi ssi on
i ncorporated
since
by Mr.
Commission
-zz-4t )
i ons f or
be
Thompson.
such be subject to the modification previous ly approved.Moti on vlas wi thdrawn.
Mr. Conrad made a motion that a permanent cul-du-sacrecommended on the west end of Fox path. Second by Mr. M5 aye - Mr. t^l . Thompson and Mr, Noziska opposed. -passed.
Mr. tl . ThomDson madepresent to the City Councthe recommendations to thapproved. Second by Mr.
Noziska - aye , 5 - nay.
motion tha t the Planning Commissionapproval of Exhi bi t A to include
sub.i ect property as previouslyziska. Mr. tl . Thompson and ltlr.
i I ed.
ail
e
No
Fa
Mr. J. Thompson rnade a motion that the planninrl Commissjonrecommend to_the City CounciI to reject the proposed planned
devel opment (Exhibit A) based on the previ ous 9 moti ons until!.hey..are.met. Mr. Conrad seconded the motion. 6 in favor14r. ll . ihompson abstJjned. Passed.
CITY COUNCIL TqINUTES - lpril 7, 19gO
REZONING AND SUBDIVIS ION REOUE RTCE LAKE MAIJOR
-4-
AND IUc!1ULLEN PROPERTI HANS E}I KLIi]GELIIUTZES, CONT INUED A motion was ma de by Council manPearson and second ed by Cou ncilman Svrenson to a PProve the 8 residentiallot subdi.vision fo cated off West 86th Street wi th the conditions setforth in the Land U se Coordinator, s report of A 1980, and aspril 1,clarified in the ab ove noted minutes. Motion a pproved. Ayes
REZONING, SUBDTVIS IO N AND PRELIM INARY DEVELOP
Al1.t-
MENT PLAN REVI EW SUNRISEBEACII . DERRICK LAND COMPANY :Roger Derrick and John Shar dl-ow were presentrepre s en t 1ng Derrick Land Com pany. The proposal is a 52 residential Iot.i. - subdivision lying south of pl
,,_ This subdivision has been del.i. to insure that the City reaso.i.r: potential street patterns get
rl. ':- E Subcl.:-Vl-saon -
easant View Road and west of Lotus Lake.ayed during the course of the past.yearnably considered all altern atives forting to and being extended from the proposed
Councilman S$/ensonof Derrick Land
th6 entire
the plat
easement area.
A motionthat the
Company
l-
2
was_made by Counc j.1man
. Geving and seconded by*:.1!ly1"l:n and.preriminary 6"""r"pm."i pranDe approved contingent upon the fo1]owing:
there be a conservation easement alongshore; andthere be a trail along the east I j_ne ofPleasant View Road to the .o.,""rritioi-
Tha t
lake
from-!.-..,
il:l:l:''1:]l:"-ll:^:ored in favor: counciLmen Gevins and swenson. rhe
;i:.--i3it3['?3rl!jiu asainst: Actins Mavor Neveaux ind Councilman peaison.-*.,
:::.:::' ( -'l:iri''. a motion was made by councilman pearson and second.ed by councirman Iji;, Swenson to rezone tie suU i ect-fr"il"" = to p_I and. to aiprove the 52 Lti: 1ot preriminarv. d.evelop*.it-prI"-"i-a"piIt.a'"i"Ir.,J"rE*"twood prannins{*.. n..ri*inary pllt aut"a'afiir-il"rido, iubjec. to-ti,u i;rowins condiiion",
t:,: 1. That the applicant receive approval of their grading;il;i ' p,an, drain;g" p i;"-;;J*eros ion contror. plan from rhe soirl*:r'' con servation -
s eivice ,
"rrru ui.r.,.sota Department of Naturaf*j-'-" Resources and the Riiey eurgatory creek watershed District;*#il. 2. rhar said uppt"""r"-iJ'r".ui,rud i.i;;-I"";;f matter beine:f :.' ]: : resubmitted to the citv councir io. pruii^ii.ry prat approval;;!:,.:':'-,. . 3. That the pedestrian-ur]i
"or,="..ration easement portion of
ii'., , ii;:l,i:*_!:,1;i:*ru::iii*,::,;;:ll":;,i:;;:;j*:li*:".;:., of such facilities, and that the applicant,s soil condition-1):.: evidence is to be ie"iIr.A by rhe City Engineer.:i,., , 4. rhar.the.appri"i"t-!;;;;;" cur_de_sac plans for rhe roadwav:... .. porrion in the vicinitv of 1or ZO, Ufo![ J-."i-f"i-Zai:.'. 31:;o.i;r.!::: or.,= aie to u. .n,i",ea'-uid-upp,o,ed by rhe
-:. 5. paved street surfaccs are to be 36 feet wide and paved::-, cul-de-sacs are to be 32 feet in dianreter.'' 6 ' That the park a"a-n."roution commiss:-orr-r.rrie,, alternativetrail tocarions bcrwecn pleasant View Road .;J t;;'";;_-^"= Iservation easement and is to submit . ,..o.*oia;;;";",J; Ithc Ciry council .rEron Eo
L_-.,.. ltotion approvcd . Ayes _ Al I .
Councj-l }loeting JuIy 2J 1990 -2-
CO]]DITIOTI\L USE PER\IIT LgruS TAKtr ES'IAIES BE\qI IOT AND MIIRANCE SIG..I \/ADT?1!r-r..llt:Inbc-rs of thc Lotus Inke lis tntcs llomcol,tners Associa n are reques trrq aFp ro'ra Ito establish a beach Iot between I"ot. 35, Block 2 and I.ot 9, Block 1. Thel/ areproposing to install a sand blad{et six irches deeo ard also instaLl trao canocracks .
FfNAL DE\,ELPrIEN]I PIAN - FOX CTTASE ADDITION (DM.RTCX IAND COI4PANY) :Johr Shardl-cr^/
@urcilm'en Nevqlr'Ly moved to approve a cordilional use pernri t for a beach rotconditioned upon:1' ttrat the beach lot cor,sist of a sard b1anket., swim area, ard two sj.x capacitycanoe racks as sho,.rn on the site p1an, City Courail D{hi-bit A, a.tJ J"fy 21, 19g0.2. That tle swim area be marked witn a ni-nirm:rn of tl:ree "swirn area,, r,-roy" trrutare in accordance w-ith the Uniform waten ay Marking Systsn.3. That the swjm area be marked b1, tl:e above ancirorei buoys at a reasonabledistance frcm shore.l'tion secorded by co:ncilman ceving. the follolirg voted in favor: r,layorHobbs, councilmerr pearson, Neveaux, Gevirg, ard sveison. No negalive votes.Ilction carried.
The honovzner's association is requeslirg a sign pe'rlit to erect an entrancesign at choctaw circle ard channissen noaa. ihe- proposed sign will not beLiqhted ard will be rnade of r^acod. staff and the sig,r cqmlittee iecraunsraeaap5rroval of a variarce.
@uncirrnan swenson moved to grant a vari-ance for the irtstal_lation of an entrance:igl il the pr:b1ic right-of-way. I,4otion seclrded tryr Councilrran f.r."**. Thefollodrg voted in favor: r4ayor Hobbs, @r:u'rcilmen Fearson, Neveaux, Geving, ardS\denson. I:{o negative votes. l,bLion carried.
.-;',-'
': -:
-a
was present to discuss the proposed p1a t ard answer quesLi-ons.
I-0I r).!JlA, flrl:l'I '1l\t,D AND R.E\II YARD SE'I1I.iCK VARI^NCES IO'IS 19 AND 20
t
,.: i*:.:r councilman Neveaux moled to approve the final develoFnent plan for Fox clase
;T:f:':,_'*:a::."*jst to itsrLs z, :'ana-a oi the City Marager,s reporr dated July 17,i"--.. J-980, and itens 1-5 in the tand use coordirEtor's report of .rLIy 9, I9s0. ircuio.,] . secorded @ co-:ncilman Pearson. The follq.virg voted'in favor, councj-lme.11 pearson,'i:., - : '.Neveau<, Gevirg, ard Svr'enson. Iuayor Hobbs voted no. l,loLion carried..!l!:: -...
corncilman Neveaux noved to approve the final develolment plan based upon tJre' confign:rati-on of 52 r"ots as presented to the city councir aprir z, rsab. MoLionseconded fu councilnraa Gevirg. The follor^rjrg voted in favoi, Councj-lmen pearson,
Nev@ux, Geving, aJd Sverson. I\r,ayor Hobbs votd rp. MoLion carried.
\ARJANCE RIO.!rEST, r.CES 653-558, 683-588, CITBVER BEACH: l,like Sorenson issee<ing t';o Iot h. tr]u n"*a "i-Adjustrnentsard Appeals reccnrnerded a;proval provided tlEt lots be conbined i" p-r""r "n"beirg Lts 653-659 and pe.rcel trvo being Lots 633_6gg.
councirman Ncveau:i moved to accept thc planrLirg rcport of July 16, 1!g0, and tl.reBo.erd of Adjustments ard APpeals reccrmcrrla tion ana tfre Iand ilse ioordinator,smsnorandum of July 11, r9g0, points 1-3. IqoLion secorded by counci Jnn:r Geving.the follcn^rirg votcd in favor: ltayor llobbs, Councilmen pearion, f,feveaui, Cevirg,ard Swe-nson. No negativc votcs. MoLion carriod.
PO I:RED @\Itry Ytzen arc rcrlucs trrg an 8,000 square too t.Iot a-rca taoance,a 25 tcot rcar yard setLlck variance to the Shorclatd I'la rngcflrent Ordirnncc. arri, afront yard variarrcc
j'l: Ron and Sl)cr
be dsnlishc<1.
of 14 fcet in order to build a hcme.lhe erisLing cabin will
.l:.
U ti Y ( }IF
[f,ffihT:ffiffi$ffi;ffii-T
/-
76IO LAREDO DRIVE OP.O. BOX I4T.CHANHASS;N, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 474.8885
l
iI
J
-J
.il
.tl
.I
-it
l
.tl
.ll
IlEllOR\]ilDUI'l
,:..,:-','j.
"- DATE: July 17,/98C
t-:'^.---ro, . city llanager , Don Ashworth
PROM: Land Use Coordinator, Bob l.raibel
'-j..:-'SUBJ: Final Development Plan Review, Fox'- ^L""r*t,
Derrick Land co.
5;..ii3,rarrsrNG GASE: P-G14
Chase Addition
sent to the Planning
final development planip:rAttached please find the planning materials,:-js-Corunission f or their revielr of the subj ect
and. the minutes of that review.
-l;..?s you rvi1l note in the at.tached planning report of JuIy 9, 1980,this office had indicated to the Planning Commission that the
. proposed final development plan for rox Chase showed an increase
Hof 2 lots over what the City CounciL had approrred at their
T*-preliminary d.evelopment pJ.an review. The Planning Commissio:-r,'-i:' as noted in the minutes of JuIy 9, 1980, had discussed this issue,
;i.i. /!l.:i and vo--ed to approve the f inal development plan as propcsed -€A;31though . it is not certain frora the minutes that the specific
bally by the City Dngineer at the Planningis not included in tl-le record, is that thean IB" grravel equiva]-ency for sLreet stand-
.-.. .l .lreason -f or the tr./o negi
_. r'Iots, they (the votesl
. ?.r.i.}l.rd eve l opme n t. :'.: '*Tdon" comr:rent clelivered
. "' Commissio:r r'eview,, vrhi
,ii.ift:, Engineer reconunen
"-^.r, aros .
ver
ch
ative votes rsas th e subsequent addition of tr,rolrere relative to the proposed density of the
-ti; *+::E:=+jpqe+!:: In_reviervins staff , Planning commission, Cir.y''-:.IJngrneer's and Attorney's reports on this itcrn, this of f icc bc1i.:-vcsthe following condiEions shourd adctitionarry be cstabrishecr:
as
he
:*it
" ''.
'st:r,v
-,t /J*ta
tl
i
I
]I
I
1;rrrsion,
I). 55 lots vrerc proposed by the developer cluring skcEch previcrv. Fo).1orving discussion r.rith re I'lannirr<; Cornmisneighborhood, ctc. a revised plan rcflccting 45 lots-r",approved by the pl.rnning Commissj-on at thc preliminary" development. plan hearing. The City Council approved t
H
[*
Pagc' 2
prclininary dcvelopment p1:n:. although staff notcd thatthe dcveloper had incrcascd. the number.of lgts from 49 to52 f orlorving planning co,n isJiJrr"foii.u".orior,. Thcdeveloper norv seeks i.i.".i J"""i;p;;;; pJ,an 16vierv anrrhas increased the number of fots, i"-'ia.
. The. planning comnisapproved this change with tr.ro ,r;nb;r;on the ru"i=-"i"i.nsity_ rhi.- ;Ei;; il::,:8":l:"t1.*1,iX.!_-.-.this overalr process ii tr,ot-tr,"-"."ir.ii_I:"::::i^yllh.pran s tase i.' u.,"- p"i" Li.",."'i=a5;; itT:::T"t;:: r:X[=". "
generar locarion oi roadway -; -;";r;;; open areas, etc. areestablished. After tfris p6int, -tn-u"i.r"foper proceeds .with specific encrineering- informaliof .".og.,izing thathe has corae to a6reernent'with the City rn regards to theseoverall land use issues. r,rUei sfriiis in roar.l a I i a-_-^+_Iot .ines, etc. can occur as . ,.".rlt'oi'.i3llrllr3Xlil".*r".data; however, densiti"" =[""ia-iJi'ie changec] by eii,her the_!llf,:: the applicant- ri tni= ti=uiior"a to occur, .-- _sr-mrt ar to the wav in rvhich it has, what i" tfr"-p"rpoJ tfpreli;:rinary devellpment plan- hearing.- o, .tt"rrpting tocome to agreement as to leve lopmen t'i.s",re s ata hearing sLf,ge. _..The developer should b".;;di;il"IJ i"a""".rhe numbei.__of . ..lots to 52 (4s appears :"ri:.ii"ur"i.--- --- . " ,."'T.1 ,The Location of the trail is stil1 uncertain at this .:time,
=:-_i.e. whether along tfre tacX-fo;-ii";';, abutting the ..:-street on the north end. of the a.v"ioi*"nt. ^In meetinq.with..the park and Recreatio" C"**i="i;;;-;f," developers hav6stated their desire to have trris aecisi";-r;i;;;;i; "Iiir,grading i's commenced and park "-a-n"".""tion commis sior,"r-J!-',,afforded an ooportunity to ru"ff. Uotir-f,otentia.J- l-ocations.-.. _.,This suggestion appears to create some problems in -:-.
5::Hli:i"1"::.?":"1::::rT":"::'::;"iTili:i:g,i-:1, :i; :*l
?]-.:f"::.1::_:!!"1.. ro exisr. n",u".il l"-""""oii,.s.rii",,*..,
:.:3r. deveropment p1an, it should be cLear that the .._.outlot area is beins accepted as u .o"iIli"ii3i .-rE".;a. #11as such, no park credit! are being gir"rr - ,,}"r*r"., ,tiiii
1t l-s to the idvantage of the a"""ioiur to have trr" a -roo r:x:{trail th:ough the conservation area i"a, *h"ti,Jr-=".f:'t!.-H:twithin this conservarion "r"" oi-fi.tiaf:-y adjacJnt. to'tir-*$lIl:dl.lhi.i deveropers asree to s."a" ""d-i";;1i1";;;U-"fi;",::3ror the trail in accordance with the recommencl,atlons df -theil!Park and R'ecrearion commission ". " piit-oi-t-h;i;-;;";lf;:;lgrading plan- , ,_ "]-.:;
As a part of both the East Lorus Lake project and Near ," . *!Mountain dcvelopmenb. proposals, significaiu discussion "-- ,.:.,
::"y.r".c- in regards to tir" ciry r s iuif ity t" "=."i"- . -..t}lat public i*6i"""^""ts are dlsigr.red an-d inspected to-. -:BCity standarcls. In conforrnance ruidr - these discussions, itis recornmended that the developer be required to usethe city's cngineer for preparirion of ;i;;;-";; =!""iri--r.i!cations and aIl staking ind inspection-^
T
ii'
I
;I
i,I
1
,.:
I
,'l
3) .
'Ih.: above con<litions are inLand Use Coordinator in hisEngineer's report of JuIy 7
3?I;"YF$.3V" i|"rlE lvrSB3tf; r3
4).addition to t.hose outlined Uy -tfiefi
rcports of July 9 and 17, and .theial- such disregaiding those variance
.uEri r3.e5:l *',ine z.iE:t';?ls3:.8
",, ;
lr '-
'..
,.-
'.-'--s€o-TT CAR\.,IER ECONOiITC COUTICTL PAR,UER'S I,L\RJ(ET
Bob l,Iaibe ave his comrnents and recon-nenCatio:rs.
:Chairnan Horn the public hearing.
Gayle liolf f ,7608 Great P s BIvd- r+a c oncerttcd about
body , not onIY t he pri est, bei n con ted alou L this arr<l
ooe
the ad.visory
the notice
ofo pening in the carver Co. Her
*.--David Pease, reP resenting t S cott/Econom
,:,': theY had sPokerwith Pat Xnorr of St. Hu tt s
rocedu and respons ibi l ities
ic Council, staLeclChurch. IIe furtherthe ]lconomic Council-
and, I,ialter Thompson seconded to the public
exPlained the P
1,.' to^ Hamilton rno
'"'Jin Th
us e_/.p
urlananrous
son moved,,t request
1y.
tlike Thornpson seconded.subject to Bob lvaibel's
to approve the condconditions. I'Jotion
I on al
car d
|tr4,,
FOX CTLqSE - PINAI DEVELOPTYENT PLAN
-;H.p-Sp,Ifaibel presentea the review and his recommendatiot'rs.
:i".):,I .- l+..'+itli--, I
)
_[
I
ri
-Ii
-ri
-'- hearing.
Fran Heigen iJ.J-ustrated the plan to the colrunission.
#There was d.iscussion on the size, and change of nurdcer of Io-us, gracle
. of approach to PleasanL Vier Road. the right-of -r'r.rys , pedes trian
-3i.,j,way easement, use of trail and the conditions ancl terms of st-aff -
.l*5;i"ia"r Thornpson moverl, Jin Thompson seconded to accepE the proposed
,,-. . Fox Chase pJ-at dated ilay 12, 1980, revised l'LaY 22, l-980, as a f inal
J*.development p].an and. that the comiaents and recottunendations made by
.5*staff ie Lnciuded';- ...
J,'".!:Negative votes: Mike Thonpson and. Art Partridgs, aue to density-..
,*;aiXE..;; ;
-:ii!i,t:,it-<i,..
1n ter.-i;\:_
*-,:_,
' -''l1
CflTY'JF
fitIfi H n5r:H rr cxelrslnH
[r&T#&ll l#,,fLHH,hi ,$]
,,i
i
7610 LABEDO DRIVEoP.O. BOX I4ToCHANHASSEN, l'/INNESOT/r 55317
1612]1 474.e883
-rt !-::,-i
]) .
FROM:
: crrE 'l -
PTANNING REPORT
-.TO:
JuIy 9, 1980
P-lanning Commission and Staff
Land Use Coordinator, Bob tlaibel .
Final Development plan Review, Fox Chase Addition
-.ta<;5..- .APPLICANT: . Derrick Land Company
----'f IaUNING CASE: P-614 i,
:..,!::.:,..!,-:$r-:,sr:. rr :i !:i
': .li'1'6g follorving is this of f ice,. .X=rirr"" to the Assistantletter of June 1?, I9BO and the Ciiy Engine..'. i;I;;. o.,e'a;,r:. - 1980 and the overall action at hand.
City Attorney 'sJuIy 7,
As you have probabry noted, the subject proposal has increased fron
=.-*- _ 5? single family residential lots to 54. this office finds that
I ffj.t!". density proposed fatls within the most restrictive guideri'es- ot the ordj-nances of Chanhassen and that any reduction 'i_n this shoutd.be substantively validated on reasons of Iolal. . phy siography
+i'\;9:-- ..!t-r'r^-,:rl response to the city Engineer's letter of July 7, 19g0, the issues
e*..,*,. council review of Aprir 7 , lggo , r.rhere in the city councir recomn-ended.i 4.ii:!lat. the street surf aces be 36 f eet. wide , ancl the the paved port.io;rot the cul-de-sacs are to be.32 feeE in diarneter- Th.er,only concern- . . that this office iras is that the reconmended roiia6f%f-:;-:"i-;;:;;"i -;;' 61r*.aer.by ordinance 33 is 80 feet.. r recommend.. -that the appr:-cini;i':':;include in their final construction pJ.ans, remediation for thlvertical curves on cu.I-dc-sacs E and D, the temporary cu1-d.e-sac-- :-,;:. -, design plans at the southerly end of the prat, ianiuary servers an<1';' 'j;+ r,ratermains as rccomr.ren<lecl in said engineeirs report rvilh additionalconsrceration for the loop.ing at the end of the tcmporary cul-de-sac-
.. i-:^. fn rcsponse to th(,' Assist:lnt CiLy Attorneyts lcttcr of June 17, 19g0.I reconmend the f ol lorving spccial concli.tions arrcl con s iclet:a tion s f orinclusion into the Ccvclopment, contracL on tlte subjcct proposal:
Th.rt a cons..-'rv;ltion c.rsemen E be csE.rbIishec] rvithinthc arca belo',.r the 900 foot clcvaEion pursuant. to theConprchr:nsivc I,lan and tha E ruithin s.r ic1 conserv.ttio:r
I
Planning Repor t JuIy 9, 19BO
easement, a pedestrian-way easement be dedicateclthat is B feet vride with 1+ foot on either siclefor purposes of maintenance (the above rvouLd nullifwthe proposed 20 foot traiL easement indiclitecl on thlpropose<l prelininary plat dated May 12, 1980, rviththe understanding that the above describecl easement.would be established upon completion of a feasibleroute rvithin t].e conservation easemenL).
That the applicant and its contractors, includino
home builders, carry out the constructj.on of '''' ,-'!
improvements and structures in accordance with therequirements setforth by the Riley purgatory Creek .":.
Watershed District, and the Soil Conservation ServiceEvaluation Report dated June 18, 1980. (The City CounciJ.recommendation is that the approvals be obtained beforetheir review of the preliminary plat. for gua).ificationpurposes, the Riley Purgatory Creek Watershecl Districthas given a conditional approval in their May 5, --.
1980, correspondence, hotrever. the SoiI Conservation .::-Service, being an advisory body, rvill not given such ---., -,
approval - Ho!'rever, I believe such may be satisfied
through carrying out their recomnendations that were ..
noted in their evaluation report) -
-2-
E
E
;
E
b-
l
L
I
,)l
3) - That extra precautions be takenexisting vegetation may be kept
construction.
Z\
E
b
r
tr
,
c
SOto that removal of
a minimum during
,'it-.:.1
For reasons of soil conditions and slopes, the building
plans for al-I residences proposed rvithin the sub ject ...-..deve.]-oPmentshou1dbecertifiedbyanarchitector
civil engineer registered in the State of llinnesota. ..,-.
That the applicant be required to post sufficient
escrows to assure that the degree of engineering
and inspection is carried out as recommended .by the
Riley Purgatory Creek I'Iatershed District and the -'.
Soil- Conservation Service.
s)
..::r.i;".
1
Jj
. -LIAM O SCHOELL
\-FLIS.LE'MAOSON
.rrCK t. vosl.[B
.IAMES R. OFR
ROLO E OAHLIN
I.FRY L HANSCN
JACK E, GILL
e-roNEY B GOnOON
EOOOFE O KEMNA
-HN lV. Ei!:oNo
KENNETH E. AOOLF
TfuILLIAM R ENGELHAROI
IJCE C. SUNOING
-scoIT HAepl
OENNIS \,V SAAPI
NERALD L BACKMAN
iir,.\ '. 4,.-.'. '
--=-{-.
^4.EJi:-.N[::i.rt!!r€-'@P
I
-
SCHOELL a. MADSON,INC-
ENGrN EE t s aruo surrve9ons
(s12,934-760'l . 50 NTNTH
^VENUE
SOTJIH . HOPKINS. ITINNESOTA 5534:l
OFFICES AT HUBON. SOUTH DAKOTA ANO OENION. TEXAS
JulY 7, I98O
Derrick Land CompanY
Sunrise Beach (Fox Chase )
Prelinr-inary PIat Revierv
City of chantrassen
.c/o Ytr. Bob I'7aibe1 , Assistant
city Ivlanager
chanhassen, Minnesota 553L7
. - r.-.,,-Gentlemen:
, ;siiil-'.i- I,Ie herein
. .!t.!:..'::-i:'as to_Ll.ows:
., .. STT{EETS.
transnr-t our p].an
ordinance, for the
review, in
above narcred
of compliance
Results are
.(.-.
te rms
PR,D.
,..-ilj,:i-.. The right-of -rvay 'anC street widihs meet the ordinance f or
aa a residentiil street. Ho\rever, it seems. to me that ttre main
. ;s,..., sireet throuqh the development rvill ultinrately b= a collector
--;.ii:;Jstreet---thu! a rvider street width should be considerecl '*.:
IntersectioaraCiiarenotshorvnandshouldbeirrdic;]ted{€;.a= 2o-ie;t. Grade on street "A" exceeds both the 796 ma-xjrar-un
.-Y*.na 3% within 3o feet of cuI-de-sac ,D't. Vertical curves on'i. cu1-de-sacs ',E', ( ub*:er enC) and "p'' (at intersection) are less
,.?-r'r.' tt.., 2o times ttre algebra'i c dif f erence as reguired by ordinance 'a-iH'c,l1-d"-sac "E" al-so 6xceeds the 5oo foot maximum length- The
method of providing a "temporary" cul-de-sac at the south end of
::--,.;:,.ttre main street is noL clear and should ba shorvn'
SAT.TIT.\RY .SET.IE!{ -
Sizc of the proposed sanitary server is not. shown, but
assumecl to be B-inch- Easernent for th-' sanitary server from
e::isting manhole to ln;-rnhol-e in strcet "A" (beti{een Lot"s '15
1,7, cloJX 3) is not shotvn. Manholcs in cul-de-s'rcs should
extencled to e-I jfiinatc serviccs Cj-rcctly into th.: manholcs -
::i.
.-',!:--;,.
-:aa :
and
be
(
\ qcHoeLL a. MADSot t.,*..(
:'-irr'):hib.i
6:E.
DRAINAGE WOzu<S.
JuIy 7,1980 ,..-,.?|l-
,: - .-,-'1..:iri.
. '. - i-r:n:WATEITT,LAI }I .
Size of the l.ratermain is not shown- We recomnencl g-inch
"" ..;.1;l-the roain street and 6-inch on the cu1-d.e-sacs- Since cul-de-sac :-j.;I'Ex is in excess of 50O feet, we suggest the watermain be looped .'t"
internally within the Cevelop,nent, or looped to ex5.sting rsatei onHuron-
L
E-
l:r
E-:
[-;
-llFrP2
-tEII-r
t
_t
EI
_lEiFi
II=.lt{t
I
E]
I
f-",.!
E,
---t
Proposed drainage
tion that the 3o-inch
increased to 36-inch.
rrorks appear to be adequate
d5.scharge pipe at 1-596 grade
CO}ICLUSIONS:
I{e reco;ruirend ap-croval of the p}ans subject to the itLmsspecifically noted. In terms of street grades, we recommend.waiver of the 776 ma:<imun grade limitation in favor of the grades ..proposed. The site simply does not facilitate 7% maximum grad.esand wa feel the proposed grades are acceptable.1.j:'-
3:r-',+::'
.'.r'r._-'.-;:'.' ,
'a,..--
"i:,,,. ..IROrr:sq
Very truly yours,
SCIIOELL & MADSOI\,IN C I
.
/.,,'1.4.-t-
,C)
Derrick Land Co[t_5a;ryllestuoocl Plannin| & Engineering
City of chanhassen
c/o \1r. Bob l,Iaibel , Assistant
city llanager
Page 2
h'
lLj
-'ai,- . . cc:
l,lay IJ, 1!81
Chanhassen Clty Councll
Chanhassen, Mn.
Dea! Ilayor and. Councll Menbers,
I had the opportunity to walk throu8h the proposed Fox Chase Development
today wlth Fran Callahan and Kurt Laughinghouse, the attorney for
Derrick Land Conpany. After seelng some of the proposed changes in
the sewer Ilne, I feel that 1t 1s necessary for the entlre park
Comrnlssion to see the revised plat agaln before any plans are
accepted, r€6ard lng the placement of the trail.
l{e could dlscuss this at our June 2 meeting.
Sincerely,
)
-- - r','.. l* ' \. ; ''--(-,J )
Phyl1ls Pope
Park Cornnlsslon Chalr
RECEIVED
lilAY t 8 tggt
CITY OT CHANHASSEN
RUSSELf H LAFISON
CFAIG M, MEFITZ
HARVEY E SKAAR
MARK C, MCCULLOUGH
Le.nsox & Mrnrz
ATTORN EYS AT LAW
r9oo FrRSl aANx PLACE WESI
M IN N EAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 554O2
July 14, 19 8I l6r2) .fa3 rSrr
Donald W. Ashworth
chanhassen city Manager
Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Re:Fox Chase Development
Dear Don:
You have requested this office to render an opinion on theauthority of the City Council under Minnesota Statutes S462.358,
Subd. 3(c) to act on the Fox Chase development proposal , which was
approved by the Council in July of 1980 subject to specifiedconditions. A copy of Subdivision 3(c) is attached.
It is our view that the Council
action whi.ch it can take:
has two alternative courses of
The Council can make a determination of whether theJuly, 1980 conditions have been met. If this decision
is in the affirmative, the developer should be
allowed to proceed with his July, 1980 development plan.
If this determination is in the negative, the developer
can be required to resubmit his application and to comply
with the zoning ordinance procedural requireme.lts.
Alternatively, the CounciI, with the agreement of the
developer, may extend the one-year statutory period
within which time extension the developer would be
allowed to comply with the JuIy, 1980 conditions or
submit alternative propo sa1
1 yyo
a
b
RUSSELL H. LARSON
Chanhassen City Attorney
RHL : mep
- RECEIVED
JUL 15 19BI
_CITY OF CHANHASSEN
er tr
a,l44L---
$ 462.358 PLANNINC, ZO.\IN(,
r,I ll,.' | \r',t_i,,, ,,f .1,l,r,,l,ri.to )rgro(,.lr,t{ il\srrri.( l)arforn,irrrce. It thr,.rr',iit,jrlir* r,riti r,,,1,rrif\. rr,,nl. j,l,r,f.!,rr .,. _,, ,;,,;r,:,,i,;;;i"ii.,,,,. ,,,,,,,r,,rrt Iir r ,,,,rrt,lt,{t s.irtr :r,.,,,,1ttt,,i.{,,,,A ",r,,i".,r",1t", r,,"',,iir,il_,,i,,,,, .f,,,f,
l-'irll.]:1.,, fin*il] nt)r,r.o'o,t, un,t ,r,i,,,t,,r,,i,,rl rl,i. rrr'i(irx,liLJ rt,,tr,,rir:,rtf{r c^rtific:rt(! to thrrt I,ff(,ct. ?!ft(,r lirrl:rlrt)rr,![l s!llxlivisioll nrjty Ix, fi]t.{lr'r I. c' rr,lr\ L
SuId. 3c. Effcct ot subdtvtstrIIL,i,,,,'r -;;,r,;^;i',,,'
i,,"."1',lll'" approv'l' I'br ooc Je,' roll'tvlrrs rrrc'
",,u,,i,,,r,..
',i,,,1 ii* 'J;;i,,,i::;,,iil; illi: llllfllii,i,,'lix,i,lllxllll,l,, ,l:1,;:",.,lii.
I'rcr,'.r,:ir,. t)t,rr ,,r,,rfi(i,rt (1,xr.,,1 s,rt, ,,r,r,rl. t" ,,i-,,i],,.i-i;;";;',;,,.",.,,,,,_nr"ul ,tonsirr, t,,t \i2,.. l,,r l,r\o,rr, or rtoaicrit;),rr ,,; p;;;i,,;'ilq,,i."u ,," 1,,."-tlritl'rl ,'f.tlin:lt't'r{,\rrl ;rI,I,Ii;;rti,,r]. t.lll,rcjlftor, l)ursu:rDt lo lts r.,!iul:rt ir)nr,trr'. nrr.riclr)rrlir.\. nrirl. r.\tcn,t !he De.to(t try :rgiocmert *iti, ili,-.ri,rr,rirt,ru"
1i,,,]-.11,,,]'",.r,, rrr.,r,r,Iii,,r,r,. 1,.r,,.,,,,,,,*,','.,,i-,ii,i"ii_',,i"i',"q,,i,.,,,,,.,,,_.,,"rl rn:rt' rr',lllir,. sIIhIIIi-ri,irL,l rr rrr,r," nJ)jllj(,ution rrrrless suhstrurtLtll I)tt)"icltlrldi.ril-r rrrt tryr,srrx,rl Lirs ,,ccrr.lr,rl iri r,rrv,rrrrl,tr,
",ii,,,,,.i, ,,"-ii,,, ,,,,r,,,,,"rll)t)lic:,ti,)r rr(t lh(. sul,(tivi(t,-,r. rvi srffrr ,,,rr*trrrj,,i ii,*,i"i,,i ',io,,,"*"
^*:'.'/'..r,t*,,.1, ,,I rr r,ll,rirrrrr]rt rr) s.l,ruil ^ ,,,,,, ,,1,j,ri",iti,,,i.- i,, ,,, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,\rith r srrt,ti\rri,,u ilrr.trirrx tjtjrnnr\l;u)(l stlrao(l O,,i.if"i,*.,rit, n' nr,,r,,"ip^t it."III.v l,J r.sntUrlolr ,,r 8t,lrr(,rur.xt tlnrr)t tlr{.r.itllrtr rt,fc"ioa tr,'t,eri.iii r,,r s,,,.t,I(ri'irl'r "f tirrr: lorrr|r trrIrn t\\'o x,rr's whi(rr it detcrnrines to be ra.irsornl,rottrr(l ;lt,l)rot'rilltc.
Subd. 4, Restrlction3 oI fllln0 and rccordlng conv6yarcei. Ilr:r nllr.nicllrullty in \!trlctr subdlrlsio rcgl|lirtir)ns urc in f0rcc rrntl hlr!c hc,.nfilr\l or r'r'corrirrl N t)rovi(lr(l in )is scctirnt, tlo coll\.(,J. nct ()t Innll to\r'hiclr. the r.rguLr(.i,,lrs llrc llIIrllc trlo shllll lx) fitt.rl n" .o-"itO, tf thc t[nrl tsrl(.scl ilrtl ill ,thc convolllDcf bJ- lt)r!t(,s ond lxrlrnds or by telerence lo lln trn_rtt't,r{)}',.(j rrgisror(\t t;Lrrl srrr!oy mtr(io:rfk,r i\pril:t1, JfXii .iii"i, ,r,,f,frr.*,fI)Llt IrrrIll(, Ilftrr such rogulittions Ix,c,,rn1 1,1J,.,,11r.,.. ftn tnan*oinf f,.out*tnnrk)es u()t tl)!ly to rr c(,rtIr,Jlrnce lf t,te Illn(l doscrlk\l:
-tlt.\r:rs ,r s,J'ur tc Jr:rrcrl (,f r,,corrl ,\lrril I, lllli or tho (irtc ol [dop on.f srt'itirisi"r r.criutr ors un,tcr [,ur!s iO.r;, i.r,,,lri,,.
-:si,- *i,i"r,.,r,, i" tr*lrlcr', ('r.of thc l(tol)rion of sul)divlst()l .cgui,,ttu,," p,,,*,r,,rri in n i,nn,".,,lor ,rol.tr,r. or
(:.1) rrirs Ilr(. illlrj!ct o( ll \.rittcnslrcll tit|rc. lrgrrctll(tllt to (onvr,y elttcrcd l to prlor to
l:l) \ rr-c u sct)rr(rtc l)rrcll o( not l[ss thdn two lrnd onc-holf acrri In arcnnnd 150 foet lD rri(lth oo Jlrtrunry t, 1g$0, orll) is x sjngl(' lxlrccl of tllntl of Dot ii.ss thlrn fivc acres nnd haylnR tr wldthi,f nol loss thrrn :l(n fl.ot ru(l its colrr.oJ:trnct! (tocs not rosltlt lu rc r !,lslonol tlrr. l)rrro.l lnto t\\'o or nror(, Iots ()1. l)llr(.r,ls, n y ollr, ot wltich ls Ics,r Illfiy. lrcrcs i rlro{ or;ltx) fl.(,t llt $,1(lth.In rrrr5 crrs,' ln \'rlrch (\)nllruulrcc \rrrh rc f,)r'r,Iloing rcstrrclroDs rvlr (,ronta;rn ,.'ccossllt.]. hnr(lshlp nn(l f,llur. to (()nrl,tl.rl(r,s not lnt.rfere \r.lth tIoJrrrtrrs,. (,f ltn srrtxli\.,stol r(,rrrLtrtons, 1lr, l,rrilitrrx ,,,,rt,,ri.iry ,n,il-*nir,r
"rr,.r,c(,rrrtrliiut(.(, l)y l(totrtlon ot rr rosolultou t,r ttrrrt lffrtt nr,,l tl,; ;r;;i',.";;,;., rr"Jllrt,Il ll'.litrd or n,rrrr.rlc'tl. .{tl.}: orr or i,r lrracnt r)f tho owDcr of lnnrl who cor.
'r..w r l(,t or p:lrea,l In \.totrrtio, of rc Irr)!isto,s nt tfrf, *,,t*iirfsfnu s,ufftl,rfllt lr(l I))'). to flr,. llrnlcttnrlitJ t J,(,lrrltr. r,f not tl*r ltn iiiii-in. nn",,r()r r'r l,,rr.rr s" (rjrl..Jr.il. ,\ ll llcllrnllty nlrl (.nJr)ln sllclt cont.o].rncrt or,l],1:t ""r,',.. srrcl, r,crrjrtry l,y :r.ii.it acrion irr rin.y c;ur or corupe;rr lurts-
.lll3;. 1" -ol::':t"n, bv .sellor:. buvor's actlon rol. dsmrqor
^ rx'rlro. ! , r ! \ r , J' l r r i.i n h('\v Irlrr,.r'l 0I Lrnrl \vhiclr,,)r th(! t,ILt for r(hi.h, I|lls nnt Dro-li,'rr,,l]. Irt.x fitorl or r(.(\rr(tr(t, ,.(l \rtrlclr tx p,irt ot ,,. ,roi,il',rl,,"ii,,,,,, o\ul,dl.rl:ir)l to rlrlch r(jol,trlrl rnurlfllrrt r,rtnt,iisl,n n,;;uLruur,s ,.i,i,i.1j, ,loffrrttr(:ir to tlrr iDstruDr(,.r r.rt c.rr'r:-v.rr.t et,rcr: (nl I.",vr.ifrf,i,,
",,'raiir'","rn. r,ytlrr (lc.k (,I rlrr. nrunirit)olity tht! rc sulxlivlstorr reg,,fnrlon";o,iii'npnr).,,,r tl'rL tlx: sub(llrlHirrl trnr tr.cn Ilt,lrroverl by thc 6ovcrnlug f,.rfyl-,r. t,f,nt,
II4
t ra+r.a-rra!*r.,r.PiE i?riir!.i.!!
'
o clrY 0F cdaNhAssir\
CHE CK'
0L2 t59
012 761'
A C O O UN I J P A Y A ] L I PA6E 1
AIICUNI C.I]IIANT
DAT E 07-2 0-d1
PURPOSE
L76 r072,4? CAiVER COUtIIY TRaASU(ER
Ir18d.22 HA(ViYF }R LBERG
REFUNOS } FIE-I (BURSE.
RE F UNSS + RT-i}I8UiSE.
Speclal Assessment Paynent for Chanhas8en l3kee
Duslness Park, relmbursed by Ed Dunn.
speclal Asse6srent refund per Councll ofuutea
7-7-80.
012751 r. ! 1. r.l AoUCHER.r GTRAL0 F.I.C. A. PAYABLE
AN 0 -FE0. INCrJt4a TAX PAYABLE
AN O.III NN iNCOII: TAX PAYASLE
!
I
I
t'
AN0-F.:.(. A. PAYAB!E
ANO-OVEq'I hE, REGULNR
072762
01276s
166. rr0 P0s, MASI: rt
6+3 . 7,+ SIAI E 1R:ASUF.id
POSTA6E
SURTAX PAYABLE
Ari0-0rHER coNS t c0 5is
S A C PAYAELEALZl647.5?3.a4 llil R rAS IE C 6N Ti{u L C0:lt
,t072765 35.60 SCBHIEG r JEAN
0 t2 t66 L20,7n SCrifIE G DENiSE
0Er-B:i I SCf H I.G
AN O-OI HER CONST COS S
SA LA RI ES + I{AGiST TEH
SA LA RI ES } I{,1GiS, I:T,!F.
5A LA RI ES . XAG.z
LZ
0
0
7I
766
9
f .?n
5 80 .77 XOhXAN VI CiOR
I
EC. INcoHr TAX PAYABLE
No-11INr tNCOHS ra X PTYABLE
AN0-P. E,R. A. FAYAB!E
ANC-Hij Y5iS GIi
7haL2 6'STEK;YLV'STER F. I. C. A. PAYABLE
AI.IO.FEJ. lNCCXE TA X PAYIE.S
AN 0- r.ri N h Il,rc0r'1E TAx FAYASLE
0ilJil aH;. C
RI€S + iAG;L
INO-P. E.A. A. PAYAE E
I
I lt-lltrrrrrtlI II tll ?tl
Nel,sletter
I
x
CIt Y 0F C hAN H a! i:r{
CHEC(' A II C U N
ACiOU'{TS PAYABLE OA]5 07.20.01 PAGE 2
iHAN PURPOSE
I
E
472774 566.69 3n0SE hAl.0L0
AN 0- *I rC0NSiN EIIPLUYEqS GaP
ANO. SALAR I iS } HAGESi i5G.
F. I. C. A. Fl'l,1lLE
Alr C- F 80.lhc0rlE I A X F,i
AN D- H.i NIJ INCOIIE TAX PAYAELE
AN O-P. '.R.
A. PAYItsL:
I N O.I{I SC ON S iN EI,IPLOYEiS GF.P
-ai
t
!I
I
3
D
3
A|10-SA-ARI!S r HAGES' R.G,
r51.J1 NI tt1 .l .C. A. F AYAEL E
-F80. iNCoi|E IA x FAY
AN
AN
-HINrr Il,lCoxE TAx PAYAaLE
-P. E.R. A. PAYASLE
nr?772 'r92. ro aF.. H 1'! C
aI C-fiISC0hS;N EHPLUYETS G
AI{3.SA!ARIES } t{AGES r R
'G.
F.I.C.A. PAYASL
AII O. FE O. ihCOhE IAX PAYABLE
AN O.I{I NN IIICO|IE TAX PAYAELE
IhO.P.:.R. A. PAYAgL:
AND- SALAR I:S + HAGES' REG.
C. A. PA YI9LE
AN C- F ED. ]NCOX' TAX 9IYA8.E
a\J-xir r :r{cor{a Tix PaYABLEc-p.E.(.4 A YA8
0 t2713 i.q 5. 1r. Gli ORY
AN C- H: SC OTI SiI{ EI,IPLOYERS GAP
tttl Irrrr{ttll !tlll I
0L277t
l
C:lY 0F ChAIIHASS:I ACL OUT TS P
CHEC(' AflCUNI C!A:XANI
CL277t \3' .7n Hi T CH.LL DOUGLAS
a Y A 8 !: oATE 07-20-61 PA6E 3
PIJRPOSE
AN O. SALARI!S T TAGES, REG.
F. I, C. T. FAYAsL.
AN 0- Fa9. INCr,Hi IAX FAYIBLE
Alr C- l1i NN INC0TE TAX P,r E
ANO.F. E.F.. A. PAYIBT:
AN O.SALARIiS } HAGES, REG.
aL27f5 507.55 3O UC H'F i GERALO F.I.C.A. FAYASLE
AIl O. F'0. INCOIlE IAX PAYABLE
AN O- XI NN IIICOHq TAX PAYABLE
ANO.P. E.R.A. PAYASLg
A(9.SALARI€S } }IA6ES. REG.
3 t2716 tn3.2'. Kcr.BER AII F. I. C. A. EAIA8L:
ANO.FE5. i}ICOIIE TAX PAYAELE
____,_aNo-uN[ I r{conE TAx P!!4-g!_E___ _ANO-'.E.R. A. PAYAELE
ANO-XI SCONSIN EI{PLOYERS GR.P
ANO. SALAR IES } [AG:ST REG
at2?77 -3Z.19 aNGaLHA;(CI KARaN F. I. C.I. FAYABLE
AN O- FEO. INCOIlE
'AX
PAYAELE
AIlC.HINIi INCOHE TAX FAY A8.E
Ari0 -P.4. i. a. FAraSL:
ATIO.HISCONSiN E IlPL OV ERS Gi,P
INO.SNL,lRICS }
"{AG
ES T R:6.
F.I. C. A. PIYAELE
),
.l
I
!
I
l
ttttttttt lll,i tl I t'l
A !271) 33{.oo NAIiCI HERFs(T
lr]Il
t5
E
I'
--E
hd
l.il
Fd-l!
hd
-E
tc
-
CiT Y 0F Ct!AllsAS.l:N a;couxrs PiyaE!E 0Ar€ 07-20-01 PAG!
CU T UKPOSECNECKT a r'l cL A i tt
ANO-FEO. INCOHE TI X PAYABLE
AN O. TI: NN IN COH' TAX PAYAELE
AKO.F. E.R. A. FAIA3L'
AN O.I,IISCON SIX
'}1'LOY'AS
GRP
AH O .SALARIiS }{A6ES r R,: G.
0 Lzt7 9 3+1.2i MEUI{ ISSEN tIARY JEAN F.I.C.A. FAYABLE
A:I O. F€0. INCOI,IE TAX FAYABL
ANO.TiINN :hCiHE TAX PAYAEL
ANO.P.9.R. A. PAYA9L:
AII9-SALARIES + WA6EST R,EG.
012 rE0 5L7.I.o K!: N GEL HU IZ KAY
59E.53 SCHLEN( 6€R AL C
F.O. :NCC|ri TAX PAYABL5
AN O. tl1N N IItCOI,I: IAX PAYAELE
AIIC. F. 5. R. A. PAYA9L;
Ax a- xI SC 0N S:N EllP.0YE^S Gi.P
lli O- SA LAi,I E S + TA6ESr R,EG.
0L276L F.I.C. A. FtYnB!E
Ari c-FE0. ixcor,li TAx PAYAELE
AN O. Hi NIi INCOI'IE IAX PIYNBg
AIi].P.E.R.A. PAYA9TE
ANs.SALARIES } HAGES T R,:G '
J
::
J
I
J
E
OI27S2 523.d3 (AiBELr ROSERI F.I.C.A. FAYABLE
AN D-FEO. INCOS: IAX PAYABLE- ANC-x;Nn INCOXE TAx FAYAgLE
ANO-P. E. R. A. PAYAELE
J
J
{
I
It
I
I
!
{
rrttrtll tlllI I r r I I "l
---D
l.
rl
l
H---HH
hil
_,_l'l
H
Fq
Htr
FI
EI'- 1i{
t-eH
HH
---knH
FI
-€
E__F.t
H
H
,,1
CIIY OF CdANHASSETI A C L
CH:CK' A M C tJ N T C T
J UN T J P A I
AIIIANI
A I L E aArE i7-20-d1 pa6E 5
PURPCS'
ANO.SA!ARI'S + I,IAG:Sr REG.
U12783 505.36 CALLABANIFRAhCIS F.I,C.A. FAYAI]LE
Atl0-FEC. :r,tioh€ rAX PAYABLE
AN O- I,!I N I ItICOIl' TAX PAYABL E
Ak!-P. E. (. A. PAYABL!
ANO.SALARI.S } RA6ES, ,IEG.
0L276 +90 7,5- Ask'l0iIH CUNALC F.I. C. A. FAYAS!E
AN ?- F!4. l NCi,rlE
ANO. HI NII I NCOh'
IAX PAYABL E
TAX PAYAA!E
I
0
!
D
N
N
A
A
AN5- P. E.d. A, PAYAgL!
AN 0- xi SC0IISIN ExP-OYEiS G'tP
AN J. SAlIRJ:S } XAG.ST REG.
a L27 65 t-r9,97 r,ar"R6a00NNarLY .c.t. F:YnaLa
-FE0. i irtoY S I,1 X FA YA
012786 690. q2 sCoI r HAi,rIN
-MINN iI,ICCI'IE TAX PAYA9LE.P...R.A. PAYABLi
AN].SA-qRIiS I XAG ES ' REG.
F.I.C.A. FAYAS!E
AX O -FEO. INCOIl€ TAX PAYAB!E
AN0-rliNN INCU a TAX PAYABLE
AIT O. P. E.R. A. P IYAE L:
A\0. SALAR I 'S
} HAGES ;i eG.
0t2787 3L2.2\ r.E 3i C CA FCRiHNN
,)
i,)
a
i
t-
I r t I I I I I ti I I l t r r r I 'l
--Tl
F.I.C.A' PAYAE!E
.4!!Q:!€0. I rtOcH e IA! PAYABLE
h"l
H
-bi
brl
H
C:IY JF ChAi'rhiiS:1,
cHtcx. a r{GUNT CL )!
ACUOU{TJ PAYAS!E CAIE A7'23'6L PAG' 6
RPO
af.l0- f : Nn :hc0r'ra iA x FAYrB!E
Ali 0 - 3. E..t. ,1 . >AYAAL5
Ah0-rllSCJl{SiN Ercr-'lYiRS 6RP
,1II O. S ALAR I:s + XAGES, it:G.
F. I. C. A. Fi YABL E
A}I O.FiO. INCJXE TAX PiYAS.E
ANo-T:Nh INCOT. TAX PAYAELE
Aiir-F. i.r..
AN0-SA!lRI
A. ;i/A3La
:S + tIAGES' REG.
01a768 ,,{.c{ i i!. Y BE! GUH
?97.9L
1{,.. 0 !
JANi rr{ArS H
Ni (lll:R
SA TARI ES T iiA6EST REG.
jA LAtrl ES + HAGES' TExP.
:!U. N' BA L.FE:S r S:iV:CE
2.52 iN VAL.EY iLECI CU.OP Ui ILIII€S
,t
:
:
.i333.'r0 tio(THERN SIATiS P0HlR C0 UII!I'iES
611.99 NOiiTH iSIERN SELL TiLEPHOIE
'--- 61;562;Eo --cn^vEi. cJUNrv r'iEisuiiER- -----FEas, sERir
BSOTOOI.O,) STAIi BANK OF CiIANHISSEN INYEST!1:NTS FURCHA SE0
d9.95 AiG BEAR 0T HE R i0Ui PnaIT
012801 Lt7L5.7t li:S I{I SCUXSIN
AN B-CONTR,I J. r INS.
012502 15!.?J Ka(diR AiT F.I.C.A. PAYABT-€
0L279i
072796
0L2?9?
180,000 c.D. 15.382, 700,000 c.D. 15.782
Tool Box for 1981 Chev, Plck Up
32J. C 6
'IAF.T
IN TALSH SA LARI;S l HAGESI IETP'
0L2t9?
0 L?19 3
461.50
231.0d
:^r!S T J F
,,ak as: H i;,t it Y
t2.c7
SA LAKI :S } TIA
SA LA R,I AS I HAGLS, TEHP.
t1:79{I
ttttt r r r r'l | | I I i I I I I I
012769
EL?79J
ttz79L
t5
---H
E|q
Eil
EI
tnl
HH
td
hiii
-EH
CIIY OF CflANHASS:N
CHECX+ ANOUNI
A C C O UN I
CL AI A
J PAY A8L€
NT
OAI E C7.?0.81 PAGi
PURPOS5
7
AIIC.FEOT INCCIl. TAX PIYAS.E
AN O.III NN iNCUH' TAX FAYA9LE
AhD-P.€,(.A. FAYABLE
AN0-0ViqTI{:. (EGt/ L A R
01260J
012 80 r
012405
ir63.2r KarrBEri Ail
,30.t7 (0HHAN VI CI0R
F.I.C.A. PAYATITE
AN,- F:0. IiICOII: TAX PAYABLE
AhO-11INN iNCOHE II X PAYAAIE
Atr0-P.E.t,'.A. FAYABLE
ANC.NISCCTISIN ;HO:OY:ris 6P.P
afrc-sALaRI:s l t{A6e5, RE6.
F. I. C. A. FAIAOLE
AN C.FED. INCOt,I: TiX PAYAE-E
AN D. MI NN IIICOH: TAX PAYAELEAitO-P.€.(.4. PAYASLS
Arl0- lil SC 0N S Itr EltP!0YERS GP.F
FE O. INCOHE IAX PAYAAL'
ANO.XINh IhCOTIE IAX PAYAgLE
AhO.P.8.1. A. PAYASL!
ANC.HtSCONSIh :}TP.OYEiS GEP
ar0-sALa11IEs + rAGEs i REE!
I.6+.65 CH/ISIiKSY.VESIE(
AIIO.SALARI'S } IiAG E5, R EG.
01280b 566.89 ik0SE H 4,1,0 i C F, I. C. A. FAYABLE
ah 0-Fal. INc0xE TA x
AN D. HI NN I hCC14 E TA X
FAYASLA
PAYABL E
:
tlt It rtt I
I llll tllIt ti li
d
i4
[n
'd
CIT Y OF CiAItFASJiN A. C C t]N I S P A Y A 8! E
A:IIANT
07-20-d1 PAG! E
R.POSACHECK' A 11 C U N T d L
OAIE
PU
Ai./ D-F. E. i. A. PAYAgL:
a[ 0- xI sc0Ns iN sr,rPL0YERs 6;tP
ANO-SILARi:S + IiAG ES, RiG.
L.j
0128 07 \9?,46 BAaHr 0UqT 1S
012805 qq5.lq _. GRaGoRY lA_E
F,I.C.A. FAYABL€
An0- FED. I COHa
J.
,
TA X PAY
AND-XTIiN INCLHE TAx PAYABLE
ANO.P.E.i.A. PAYABL'
AN D. SALAR I ES } IIAG:Si RE
F. I. C, A. PAYABLE
G.
ANC.F:0. iNCI,ME iAX PAYAS!E
AIi O.Ili NN II\CCHE TAX PAYAB.E
ANO-P,E.K.'I. PAYABLg
AN O.IIl SCCN S IN ' HPL CY ERS 6R,P
AN O. SALARIiS ' XAGES, REG.
c12309 435,7d F. J. C. A. F A YAELE
ANO.FEO. INCOHE TAX PAYASLE
ANO.fiIIiN INCOIIE IA X PAYASLE
AiIC-F. E.R. A. PAYASLE
ANO.SALARIES + HAGES ' R,:G.
' !12d10 t87.55 B OUC HEF. GiRA LO .i.C.A. FAYABTE
INC-FE9. ltrc0HE TAx
AND-l'Irit\ INCotlE TA x
PAYASL:
PAYABLE
ANX.P.E.R.I. F AYABT5
AN O. SALAR ]ES ' HA6EST REG'
.,1
I tl rrttt r tt tll ttIIIt:
\lIrl.'
di
CITY 0F CriANtiAsjah
clEcK. anou
07-20-61 PA65 9
RFOSE
A C C O U]I T S P A Y A A ! i OAIE
NI CsAinANI 2U
'i
012 J1r r32.19 !ll6E! HARJ I KARaN F. I . C.I. FAYAOLE
AIIC.F.O. II{COH: T1 X PAYABLE
A 0- rr t \ Ir{c0H: Tnx PAYAB!€
ll\0-P. 4.:(. A. PAYABT:
2I
:
;
J12d12 325.9d lANCY h',tFiRT
AII C.Ni SCCNS IN
'IIPLOYEqS
6RP
AN O- SALARIE S T xAGES' R:G.
F.I.C.A. FAIAB!E
ANO-FEO. I}ICCI1E TA X PAYAELE
AN0-tll Nfr I tlcur.lf TAx Pl
AN0- F. E. R. A. P!YABu!
AN O- X: SC CNSi N E XP! OY EIS GRP
AN O- SALAi IES } HAGES. RE6.
0 :.2 t13 J.1.21 reu{ I55a{ xARY JiAN F. I. C. A. FAYAE.E
aN c-F40. tNcoHa Tix
AII C. XI IN INCO(E TAX
Alr0-P. €. R. A. PAVABLE
AN O.SALAR i:S t XAGES
PAYAELE
. R,EG.
PAYABLf
0 12 51,.51r..o (L.N G:LHU TZ KAY F' 0. INCCP: IIX PAYAE!'
Ahc-rINfi idc0HE la x pAYAelE
AI{0. P. E.R. A. PAYABL!
AN O.IIi SC CNS II,I EHFLOYEqS 6RP
AN O- SALARIiS } IiAGiS, REG
012o1,5 9 c.5J J!hLali( SERALC F. I. C. A. FAYA9L€
AN O.F'i. I\COXE TAX PAYABL€
ttttr ttr lllI
!I f I lll'I I II
=
CIIY OF CHAIIHiSSEIi iccourirs PAya9La oaTE C7-20-d1 ol6E 10
c HiCK+tt OUN I C ! A;H A NT PURP OSE
AN D. HI NN IITCOHi TAX PAYABLE
AN0-P.E.R.a. PAYABLa
AN0-SALA(IES l HAGEST R;G.
q. r. c. A. F AYAALE
AN O. FED. ihCOHE TAX PTYASLE
Ah 0- Hi Nli I NCJYi ,A x PAYAeLE
AhO-P.E.i,.A.9AYAALi
7 ai5 36 CA.!AHAN FRA NClS
Aft c- SALAR IaS 1 XAGES, R:c.
F. I. C. A. FAYABL€
AtlC-FE0..INCuf'l4 TAx PAY ABL E
AN0-l.lINN INC0llE IAx PAYAgLE
ANO.P. E.R. A. PAYAEL:
F. I. C. A. FAIABLE
AN D. F EO. iNCJh.: TAX PAYABLE
AN O.11i N Ti INCOIl' TAX PAYAELE
Alr0-P.E.<.A. FAYABLE
AN C- fll SCOhSITI E HPr OYE.(i GTP
ANC.SA!ARIiS } IIA6ES, R,EG.
012 31d 907.5{ asHr{oRTHooNAt0
ANO.SALAq,IiS T XAG;S. RE 6.
I
EE
0 12 619 559.97 GEORGE OJ NIISL LY F. I. C. A. FAYAELE
AN D. FE O. I
AN D. HI NN I
ANC.F. E.R.
NCOI{E TAX PAYAELE
NCO!{E TAX PAYAET E
A. PAYASL!
AN D- SALARI iS } HAGES. R:G.
_t
I
!
rtll llll ,t'.llrttllIIttt!
0!2816- - - 52J.83 ]{AiBi!! toBr{l
_t
I
l
.il
c:IY 0F CriANr,lrs:r,aj!0UilIr PilA3rt oAt: !7-20-61 PnG: 11
CH:C(' A iI O U N T C C A: II A'N T P SE
072n2A 69J. '.! 5C0T r ARTIN F. I. C. A. FAYABLE
AX O.F'0. iI{COH! IAX PiIYAELE
AN 0- Hi llN IhCot{E tAX PIYABTE
AH 0 - P. E . R . A . 2 A Y AS L E
AN C- SALARICS } I{AGES ' REG.
L 6i4 .31 ,rI !L iAH f,lutl(F.I. C. A. FAYABLE
AN D-FE0. :flConE Ti X
AN O.II NN iNCCHE TAX
ITIO-P.E.R.A. PAYAAL
PAYASLE
OAYABL E
aIc-xIsc0NSII:]'eL0
ANO- SILAR IES } TAGE
EES GRP
r R:G.
Y
472 32?3L2.2\ RE6E CCA F OREIAN F.I.
AN 9-
-,- _..4N 0:
AN O.
FAYABLE
I NCONE IAX PAYABLE
c. A.
Fto.
xi Nt\NCUH' TAX PAY AEL E
R.A. FAYAEiE
012823
ANO. Ti SCCNSIII E I{PL CYEF.S G',P
AN0-SALA'tILS c HAG aS, R !G.
-
281'5{ saLL.:_:_':1. __ _ i;ilFi3: ii;ii:'r4, qrv!qr.€__-__
ANO.III NN INCOXE IAX PAYAgLE
AI{D.P.E.R.A. PAYABLg
AIIO.SILARI eS ) tAGEST R ic.
191.lb K0HlrA VICI0R FE O. INCO}I. IAX FAYABLA
AN O- III NN I A X OAYABIE
0 1a ,2e
L__
.
.:
I
I I I I tl IIttIttrl rl r I tl
-1;
CIIr 0F CnAiihi5Sah acc0ur{Is P,iYABqE 0atg 07-2c-51 PAG: 12
cx:cx. nHouNI c*/rI{a(I RPO SE
AH0-F.E.i.A. PAlA8r-!
AN0-0VEqTiH:. REGULA'i
n L 2125 11l, b J CHASIcK SYLVcSIiR F. I . C.I. FAYA3LE
AN 0-F--0. lNC!,r: llI PAYABLEL
All0- 11: tr t\ I NCox . TAX EA YAB.E
Atr0 -P. E.5(. A. PAY,13L:
B-CVaRrlYqr RE GULAR
0r?8?6 154.76 SkEHH CUnIIS F. I. C. A. F AYABLE
AN O. F ED. IiTCONE T
ANO. HiNN INclllE I
AND-F. E.R.A. PAYASL:
AN D-OVEqT IHE, REGULAR
i.t
j
:1
I
a
a1?e27 52.7C iiTNEGASC 0
012 826 t.29?.67 SIA IE 8AN( OF CXANHASSE
A1?329 2'16J.31 nir{N CoH{ 0F R.iVil{Ue
012530 37,\i PolIr,lAST:k
J12631
012032
012613 26. '.0 O€L8ERI SCHilI €G
C12d3$ 57.2) rgnHIaG. JiA
N
UTILITI:S
F€ D . INCOtl' ]A X PI Y
III NN lIICOH' TAX PAYASLE
62 KAiHY 9 JORIiSON
PO STA6E
An;ESrH AGES r TEHP
HI SC C OII IRACT SVCS'0t v0:0aD Ci{iCK
€12835 1.7. FiljIsAifj:l
SA LARI
'S
r {AGES, I:XF.
ES. HAGES ' T:
FOSTAGE
0L2a3i)?5.L2 auGShE H.l L.F. ES r S:PViC.
35 2. J.i
72d37 JA i: NALS H
xA(I IN HA L)H
S ALARIES 4 TN G
SA LAnI ES r NIGES r f€xe.51433a
I
llll rlllttrttttlI I
-]}
i
CIIY OF CHANHASS.h ACCOU\T
CHEC(+ AI,IOUNT CLAi{A
0AIE 07-2a-81
PURPOSE
5 P A Y A 8L E
NT
P AGi 13
r
1
,l
I
I
i
012d39
0126110
445.54 ERrisI J F
9..2J SCHHIEG ]'NIS:
SALARIES
SALARIES
r lirAGES.
+ rAGaSr
TEHP.
TEIIF.
0123q1
0 12 3q2
012 dr.3
SA LAiI E5 ' hA6EST IEHP'
FE'ST SERV;CE
P. E. R. A. FAYAELE
AII D-CONTRIg, , RETI R,E.
LA.75 EVALIIiA (LaIN
27 2.AA BkiTT l,{IITA
3I530'67 SIAIETR:ASLJEiR
-2
0L?944
0128r.5
153. j'l ni,,N 60t!,,1 0F RE',,ENUE
244.c7 cRoxN LIF€ INsukAHcE Co
SA L'S
'AX
PAYAB!E
CO NTRI B. , ]NS.
trc12,4,STAIE TR: AS U F.5R F.I.C FAYAB LE
AND.CONIRIB. ' I NS.
,l
0123{7
0128r+o
012 549
UT ILII I..S
UTILIII'S
7.td N0LTH:A.N STAIaS P0{ifr. C0
23.+{ HIIiNEGASC 0
\2.57 rloi\I HHiSI E,tN BELL
1' 195 ' 883.5"CIIEC KJ HR:TT
'N
TE LEPH OI'I E
I
T0TAL CF 91 ChEC(S ToIA! 1't 95'd63.6'.
J
J
J
l
rtt I ll tl I I
,IlllIIIIItIi
Tennls Instructor
t
CITY OF CHAhHASSEt.
CHEC(I AtIOUNT
A C L O UN I5 9 A Y I B L E
CrAItlANI
62.10 A } G CRAFIING
0alE 07-20-e1 paGE
PURPOSE
016 717
6 r.6 718
016 719
016 7 20
AIIO-LANC.PURCHASE } I ItP
Iq AV EL } TRAI}iIhG
FSES, SEavICE
SUFPLI ES T O FFiCE
AIi O-Pi I hYI NG AI{O PUBLISHING Bi,
H;,993. 8{ A0VAnC: AXSU-tNC: AN0 SUFCLI:S, PROSRT{
3i69'.11 EARL F ANJERSEN ' ASSOC SIGNS AII3 SIGNAL S
1J.:O ASSCC CF H:TRC HUNiC
<r75r.38 B,\ t{ INC
Flrst Ald Suppltes
20 SEatlon Vtda Coursel, to be retubursed fron school dlst. 112
5 ' 6 91. 9r.
1C0.0c
175.00
FE ES, SlqVICE
FE ES I SERVIC€
8E (G
'
RSON - CAS IiELL INC
CiiY oF 9Lcor,rINGT0N
8K'HN }1AR Y
AII A F OED CCNST CONTRACTS Repalr8 to west Jr. High WeIl
Aniial Inpormd Servtces ltay
Clesnlng Publlc xotks Bldg. , Jun€
016I ?L
0767 22
o16723
_0 L6t? \
cL67 25
016 72 e
4L6127
c16 724
7L6129
306.6C ERYANAGGRE6AIES
323.'5 BRIAN FOCK PRCCUCTS INC
2i 888.7. 8uS I l€ss FURNITUR€
IIA I hIE NANCE TIA TERI AL S
t.lA INT: NANC: tlAlERI ALS
OFFIC' EOUIPTHENT
56.i9
38.i0
191.9d
CAPITOL SLECT IONICS lNC
car.vER couxlY tgsTr-AcI
CARVER COUNTY IiERALO
RA OI OS
PF.IITI NG ANO PUBLI SHIN6
PR INII NG AND PUBLISHING
Crushed Rock
Agrtcultural I
Pager Batteries 6 Repalr 1 Pa8er, F.D.
0 16 73.1
010731
7L6732
015 7J3
016 73 r.
016 735
72.TA CAKVER COUI{TY IREASURER,
26.9i CE ri IUR I LASORAI0RI:S Ir.l0
1r602.6J CHiN FiR.: RELI.F ASSN
RA OI OS
T,IA INIENII{CE HATERI IL5
SALARI ES T HAGESi REG.
nadlo !,lelat. July, Aug., Sept.
'- Patnt ReEover & Insect Spray
91.00 per nan per flre carl, 4lL - 6/3O
J9.0J CHAN IIR: AN0 AUI0
295.5a CHAN I.ASS5 N AU,O PARIS
J2.50 CHAN HASSEN ELECIRIC
HOIOR FU:L S l LUBRICANTS
SUoPLIES. V:H.iCLgS
ANC.SUPPLiES' EGUIPIH€NI
AN C- HA INTENANC E IIA IERIALS
016 736 SU PPLI ES ' ECUIPTHENT
I
III
t
l': I I I I
CJIY 0F ChA HtSSitl ACC0UritS PAvAaLE
cH€cK. I h o U I I c r- A I rt A N I
0ar€,17-20-01
PURPOSE
PAG' 2
015 737
016733
016 239
016740
016 7r.1,
016142
016 7(l
0 15 71.I.
45.00
5rr1J.50
a2;-
- 423 .6r. - --
25. Cl
CHAN H ASS€ N FAI{ILY
ChANHASSEII FIR: O EFI
CHANHASS: N LA hN + 3P0i.TS
CHAS KA AUTO PAFTS INC
CLE VE LA NC C0I TCN Prio0UCT
COFFEE EiEA( SYSTEYS
COfiII OF T RANSPORIA TI OTI
COIi}IAY FI RE ' SIFETY
FE ES. S€RVICE
SA LARl ES l XA6ESt i,EG.
PhyBlcal Exao. Sally Belauo
Flre Call Pay 4/1 - 6-30
Toro Caa por,ered weed whtpOI H:R
'CUiPM'NT
SUPPLI ES. EOUI 'T tli NT
! I NIENA'{C' HA I€RI ALS
UT IL ]TIES
50 lbs. to$els for metels & ln !rel1 houses
180 lbs. hand towels & 50 lbs. towels
t 0.00
206.95
R5P. } IlAINI. t EOUIPT.
RE P. } IAINT.' EOUIPT.Air taok repalr, 4 flre extlngulshers (I Lake 1:
Ann Park, I ner, park truck, 1 De', duEp truck' tI eueeper) i:.
S18n perult renelral
AN C. SU PPLI EST EOUI CITENI
OL6I\5 ti33.35 C OCROINNTED HANAGE}IENT
0r.67r6
016 7 47
0.70 C0PY €oUI PflE Nl INC
59.50 , oA!E GRE-:N C0
0167{5
,L6 7t 1
016?5c
259.89 OOi,SEY HI NOHORS T EIAL
6I E. 9{) DYIIA HC] IXC
1.200.00 E0',lARDS C0BPAfiY IHa
0t675t
0/6152
0 t5 753
0 16 7tt
0L6755
0lb756
FE!S. COIISULTING
AN O.FEES r S€F.vI CE
PK IIlTI NG INO PUBLISHItic
LA ND-PURC HAS: } IHP
FESSI CONSULTI NG
SU FFLi ES i PRO6RAIT
OT H!R EOUI 211ENT
FlrBt Ald Supplles
Crlnder PuEp for Llft Statton #8
Actd Hydrofluoslllcic, Chlorine'
Hazardous Waste Surcharge
1965 Eonds
266.
'.8
FEaD RtI= C0NTiCL
76t.53 FIO€LlTY BANK I IRUSI CO
CHEIICALS
OE 8r I NIER:ST
AT{C-PAYING A6'NI FEES
Ci 8T i I{T ERE SI
AN 3.PA YI \6 AG:IIT F:gS
---- 37.?t FIXA|CiAL CO(XUIICATICi{S- PRINTIHG ANo PUELISBI G- oilundJrl-
55,8L6.55 FIF.SI NAI O. Bl( SI PIUL 1967 Bonds, Uunlclpal Bldg, Bond6
2t
I
I
FOiic iER H UBER T
FR CNI IER LUNBER
SA LARI.S T NAG.ST TEII9.June Plunblna Inspections
SUPPLIEST OFFICE
..J
II
I
I
eI
aIII
I
3r.0,83
f
hdid------t,l
E
F1
E
II,III
CJIY CF CiiAliHASS:N ACC0UIiIS PAYAS
CHEC(I A x C U N I C L A i r{ A N ?
E 0aI a 07-20-d1 PA6E
PURPOSE
AN O. HA INTENANC' IIA TERIALS
Ar,i 0-SU PPLI ESr EoUIPTXENT
aN 0- sr{ALL T00Ls + E0uIo.
AN0-LA lio - PUFCHA SE o IxP
SU PPLI ES, OFFiCE
n.-'
d:
0L6 757
0L675I
016 75 I
_ .016 760
016 761
SA LARI.S } I{IG:Sr R€G.
UTILIIIES
RE P. } },IAINT.. VEHICLSS
SA LIRI ES + *AGEST REG.
AN O-I.II SC. HITERIALS } SUFPLI
3'7.68 G€N.ERAL OFFICE- PROOUCTS
15C. ')O GEVI NG OILE
11. {J G r-EN r{C0 0- l NCr- E h00 C
35E.66, . e0PXgR GLASS _CCnpANY
2 36.9 0 ron HA rllott
9. OC HANUS IlSCHANI CAL SERVICE
99.26 HoLI EAr S IITI Crisr CRES
r.60.t0 Hot\EY(ELL INC
18. 1O FOF(INS OJOGE
15 !.0 0 CLARK HoAN-- -
0fflce Supplles
2 Truck t{lndshlelds, 2 tractor Cab l{lndolrs
I{ell-Mount Phone ln Copylng Room
July Copier Charges
:
016 ,62
ll16753
HA IN'ENANCE HAIERI ALS
}IO IOR FUELS } LUBATCANTS
TE LEFHCNE
SUPPLI!ST EOUI Pl XENT
SA LARI ES + TAgES' REG
Lt .522.1?
1 i 75L. aL
IOEAL ENTERPR ISES INC
i8l't
AIAFDEC CCNST CONTRACTS
q€NT AL , :O U IPT t{ENT
3L.75 INTERNATiu CIIY
5r.. 62 IiASCA EQUIPI{ENI
SUPPLI:S, OFFICE
SUPPLI:ST EGIJJ P?X!NT
65.1E J}RFAOIATOFCORP
015 765
016766
0 L6 767
01676e
015 759
016 77!
016771
/
01677 2
41677 3
0 L6771
0L67f5
1( r () 32.89 JOHN KLI}I6ELHUTZ
REP. } NAINT.T V'HiCL:S
NgARSED COIiST GONT RI C TS
FE ES. SERVIC€
J
7,992.50 (OHL RUSCH ABSTRACT ANO
98,45 (OKE S H ATHLET:C
T31.O{) LAKE XAY SIGNS INC
SUPPLISSi PPOGRAIT
Abatract Searches for HRA
11 Dozen Tennis BaIl s
SU PP LI ES, VEHICLES Letterlng fo! door of flre truck
RetEbursed froD lnsurance conpany
-5
J
J
Jt
iII!II li
e(
)
Parta for Mo,er
Recore Radlator
tr
IIIIII
CIIY OF CHAKFASS:N
cHEc(. Ar,rCUNl
016 776 1q.0 7
0l67ft 6i41q.9!
c c 0 uir I s F A
C.AIIIANT
LANO €0UIp[i{T INC
LAF,SON } IIERT Z
0!IE 07-20-El PAGa
PURPOSE
SUPPLIES. ECUIP'ItE}II
Y A 8L €
FE ES. SERV:C:
ANO-FEESI CCIlSULTI NG
AN O. LE GAL + FISCAL
OUTSIOi ENGINEER,IN6 FEES
AHAftDa I CCNST CottT RACTS
AH APCE D CCNST CONTRACIS
FINAL PAYIENT, NO RETAINAGE
FINAL PAYI{ENI J NO RETAINAGE
016776
'nL6f7I
0 !6 780
016761
01678?
016 783
0 15 7Ci.
o Le f65
- 0157E6
016707
016 768
0 16 789
9 ,29 6.
23,r52.
?7,r.5B.
1 , 1t6.
2, cr 1.
695.
30
00
c0
00
ec
LAYNE XINN'SOTA CO
JA}IES LEC K COTPANY
JAhES LECK CO I{FAN Y
JANES LEC( COttFANY
JAhAS LEC K cOI{FANY
!ONG LNX€ FORC TRACIOF,
AH ARC: O CONST COIIT RACIS
A XAFlOE O CONST CONIRACIS
SUPPLIES T ECUI PTHE NI
57.50
6C.00
1€ ,5 61. 10
SCOIT TIARIIN
JATiSS T'C HAHON
ETRO TASIA CCNIROL CO}II{
TR Av EL } IRAININ6
TF A VEL r IRAtt'IING
R' I{I TI TC OTHER AGEiCtES
17.50
80.00
59r221.39
I.INt{.:AFOLIS S IAi 'TRIEUNE
,IIIIN REC T PARI( ASSN
I(I NNESOIA VAL LE Y
aullc parts fo
6 other equlp.
Repalr Trlunph 6lde Eo!,er, Hydr
Ford'tiaatdr to iun ganS oouer
1 day wages to attend State r,ire School
Adv. for Park/Street }lalnt. person
1
0r.6790
016 791
o 16792
490,65
8.4.57
22.08
PR III II NG ANO PUBLISHING
FE ES, S€RVICE
AH APCSO CONSl CONTRACTS
LA NO.PURCHASE + IIIP
HO IOR FUELS + LUBi,ICAT{TS
CL EA NI NG + I{ASIE REIIOVAL
016 793
016 794
0L6795
015796
016 ?9 f
Cr..00
1'.4.58
5.05
1r791.95
15 0. 0 3
IIh VALI.€Y ?IHOLESALE INC
}IINN VIC'ORIA CIL CO
CITY CF XINNETRISIA
rO 8I Lg RAOIO
XILLIAE I.iONK
E0B r,tcoFa
I{UELLEP. HN } SONS
NEVEAUX JO HN
RA OI OS
IRIVEL } IRAININ6
sH ALL ICCLS ' €outP.
R.adlo liatnt. July
llovlng Expenses
}IA I ITENATICE }IATERI AL S
SA LARIES + HAGES. RE6.
Blacktop
I
I I
lil
lr:l
-H
III I I I
CIty 0F CrtAr,lxtS!!H
CHECK} A}ICUNI
016 79I 1,26E.99
016799 133.115.9C
0 r.6!0 0 -'456.tu
016 E01 290. t 0
015 60 2 Lie.lc
ICC0UN tS PAIAALE
CLAI ANI
L61.C2 IH' PRiST COI'IFANY
9re50.3a i H REhNER 1SoNS I{C
12.75 REYN O. CS PELDIIiG
1i,5 0 S tr AP- Cl^. T00LS
R.C.C.U. Aprll
Refunding Bonds 1978' Bonds 1971,
Bonds Serles 21976
' Iloplre Fees Hay through 6/17
PocLet Recorder
FlIn alld Processlng
Eonds 1972,
0ar a 07-20-3r
PUFPOSE
FE E5 r SSqViC:
qAGE 5
CI IY CF NEX BKIGHTCN
N H NATAL SANI( OF HPLS
FE ES. S'AViCE
OE 8T INTEPLST
AIJO.FATING AG.NT F!ES
- (TF.L FETE RS ON
EHIL IPS OUSIN ESS SYSTEITS
Ih: FHCTO FAC TORY
_D;
H.-Fi:
-Fd ctrl
SU PPLI ES. O FFI CE
SU F'L]:S T OFFICE
AN D- r,i SC. nl;!RIAL S
Fi ES. S:R Vl C:
REN'ALr !CUIsTI{E!I
SU PP Li ES. PFOGRAM
} SUF)LY
--]
4
016 30 3
01630'.
0 r6 80 9
016806
t,550.87
19.i3
1'r. 50
,,IERS0N-H I LCCX iL aa TR IC
2I lNe Y A0 x:S
PRA IP IE OFFSET FiTINTIIIG
Electrlcal for West Jr. Hlgh l,Jell
Postage Heter Rental 8/81-U/81
Softball cate cards
Parts for l,ell 3 chlorlnator
HAINTaNANCi HATERIALS ?arts-foi well3 -
HI IN T: NANCi UATERI ALS
At]f,. RE 9. + IlAIi.IT., UTILITY
AI{ A.i OE D CO}iST CONIRACTS
7125 3. An
58t .\5
ROEERTS LIIHO INC
s |rl tEstI NG
SUDPLIEST EOUI PI|ti:{T
ANO- PENTAL. EQUIPI I{E NT
PFINTING AND PUBLISHING - Prlntlng Newslelters
OUISIOE ENGIN'SR,ING FEiS
90J.50
18r7t9.32
SAIELLIT'
SCT0ELL +
I NO USTR IES ]NC
HAO SCN
qE N'AL r LANO ' 8LO65.
FEE5, SERV I CE
ANC.OUISIO5 EN6IT{:ERING F'ES
!166t3
0 16 61t
B1.t'. -- SEELYE PLASTICS INC
8Ol).OO RUSSELL SHITH ASScC INC
016 so7
016 8e6
016E1n
0 16 811
!16812
016 A1t
FE€S i CONSULI.I NG
AN'.FEEST SEFVICS
SH ALL ICOLS } EOUIP.
tal
H]
hd
H
II
E
--1j
E4
E]
-+1ts
ti--u
E
IIIIIIIII
CIIY OF CITTNFASSEN ACLOUNIS PAYIgTE
CHEC(. A lt C U N I C i_ A t ft l N I
0AtE 0t-20-41 PaGE 5
PUFPOSE
13. qq
3t 5.95
11.. '{ 0
JII SUEURE AN ACVTRTISER
SIUA iI-HCCPEi, COTFANY
SUBUREAN AUIO ELECTRIC
015 516
t16317
016 618
SU2JLIiS, OFFICE
SUPPLI ESr i0UI PIrtallI
PF INTI NG IND PUELISHING Adv. Psrk/Nalnt. person
Supplies for B1dg. Inspector
Elecrrlcal Tape
016819
016E20
016821
0L6 8?2
016823
016 82 '.
SALARIES. HAG E S. R,EC.
SUPPLI ES! EOUI PT ENI
FEESI SERVICE
OI HER EOUIPI{ENI
{A I NTE NANCE fiA'ERI ALS
FE ES i SERVICE
LlEplres, }{ay 1981
Plcnlc Table6, Park Benches
016 625
01532t
0t6 821
55.?5
2!.2A
1ri9.88
UhIFORIIS UNLI I{1TE O
VILL AGE C HE VR,CLE I
iACO NIA FAR SI"PPLY
SUPPLIEST OFFICE
SU POL: ES. ECUI PTI',I:Iit I
)t
,:l
UtI I FOlHS } CLOTHIN6
AN C.SU P?LI ES. EOUIPTTI'N
ANC.TIINiEIiANCE XA TERIALS
01682E
016E29 139.53 ,ia8:it + TR0SeTH INC
-.taIfiTENANCa HATERIALS 50 neter horns and varlous parts for neters
AN 3. XERCHANOIS E FOR RE.SA!E
2 palr boots, F. D.
Dupllcatlng peper
{. Nl AI- ,
'CUIPTHENT
June charSe and equlpment reooval charge
016832 2q.i1 ZACKS SHALL TCCLS l EoUIP.
0163J0
015 A31
J66.?3
98r.CC
TILCCX F,IPER CCXFANY
XEi(OX COR,POR,A TION
UNIF0RxS r CLofHIN6
-SUPPLIES. OFF:CE
SUPPLI ES' ECUIPTI,I:NI
SUPPLI :ST ECU]PTI'IENT
cutter brushe8 and sweeper broom for street
sweeper
Repal! oanual for loader
0166J3
C 16 83q
016 6 35
016 636
,01.u0 ZAnNotH BaUSH llCR(S INC
30.2J ZI eGLEE INC
1'12...50 l€R0 CFAPERY C0 IhC
7i.IO DAVIES INC
AIIARDEo CoNSI CONIRACIS Drapetles for city Hall 6 l,ebor for 1nstalllng
aod .loving lods tn Llbrary.
REP. l IAINT.iELoG + GNo t{alklray extenslon to refuse erear Clty Ha1l
;
it
j.'i
I
I
I
1 ' 165, 69 '{ATER FRC0UCTS C0
150.00 PATRIClA S r{ENSCN
21.30 IHUR( BOOY } ITPLEHENT
17 6.0! TKI -COUN' Y UTFIRES
!..35 Z. OO IROJAN PLAIGROUNO
'qUIP15.30 TRUE VALUE EUILC!NG CTR
25.00 Tl{:N CIiY r{ATER. CLIxIC
7.J
dc
IItltII
!r I tl I I
IJUi{
IYCUNT CLAITANI
YA3 € 9ATE C7-?0-E1 pAGa
PURPCS
7
CHECK'
016 83 7
0r.6836
016 639
123
T0l rL 0F
LA iiD.PURCHASi + I IIP
SU PPLi EST OFFI CE
8U I LDI NGS } S'RUCTURES
,5.00 iIhI LOAO RaAOY XrX
67.e, IoURLANE IxC
I38. ?' HHE€LEP {AROHARS CO
150 r 3?8.1{ CHECxS xRIIraN
123 CHECKS IoIAL i.6(),JZE.1r.
Curb Blocks, Lake Ann park
Balloons, Strtng & Heltun for open house
Insla11arlon of door handle for door onireat elde of Clty HalI
I
lt-
--Hts
E]
h4
H
-bl
tr__Etl
__#
IIlIIIIIIIII
C ITY OF CH ANH A5 SET.IP.0. RDX 14?_ CIIANHASSEN, !.1H 5531?
s tAND .IRD R AT E s
STORAGE.60- INFACT STORAGE 6.OO
P RIME CUNN 13. 50
N0li-PPlllE C0liH 9.00
- PRIYF; CRU .110
il0ir-PRLr.lE CRU .070
COORDINATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
8401 WAYZATA BLVD. SUITE 3OO
MINN EAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55426
I UVCICE I{U'IBER 4651
DATE JULY 1, 198I
U S AG E FOR JUI.IE 1981
NET 10 DAYS
CRUS
P RI I'I E NON-PR
STAIID ]RD TI}.IESH IRING USAGE
c 0lillEcT
- USER PROJECT STORAGE PRII,IE NON-PR
111
111
300 TI;D l{0
300 TID itO 2
30O ST09AGE
101A1 300
1OO STORAGE
TOIAL STANDARD
,|
3.1 5.5
189
599
2'lt
382
3. 2 5.5
3.2 5.5
0
1133
?88 11 33
?83 1133
TOTAL DUE
22.14
236.55
66.60
325.29
TiJT AL
r22.33
391.52
5 CURREI{T I.'IONTH TOTAL
STATEI{ENI OF ACCOUNT
INUOICE NUI'IBER 45?6 DATED O6l01./1 981
391.52
83 9. r3
A 1-1./2t PER |"l0llTtl CARR'1 IhG CiitRGE ',{ILL AUT0}lATICALLY - r.,hfi ADiTED T0 ACC0iTNTS RECEIVABLE ovER 30 DAYS oLD. ?1pFl,ru .tppaEcrArE youR cooFERATroN.
O.i. U,,tl
{fi-4Am
44'l .62
I
.<
SMI TESTING
5O NINTH AVENUE SOUTH . HOPKINS. MTNNESOTA 55343 . pHONE Office: g 3a,76 O 1
Lab: 938-6722
TO City of Chanhassenc/o ltLr . Bill !,[onk, Engineer
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
o )ER No. 1O84O-T oatc 7/9/8L
B-S OUE UPON RECEIPI OF STAIEMENT
CITY HALL SITE.June I0, I98I. For tests per attached report.
PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN
r
soils Engineer
Mi leage
6
]8 mi.$23. Oo
o. 20
hrs.@
@
$r 38. Oo
3. 60
$l4L5q
,/4
b03'{t-;z
,\n\ utu'Lnt .tO.lu,'s tt old?r.tl h? rub)?.t to a I.ll.t% ,,,onthlr
I INAN( E CITARGE ot on ANNUAL Pl:RC ENIACE RATE oI l6.b
ANALYSIS OF ACCOIJNT
14I.60
oRDER No.1O84O-?
SMI TESTII\IG
-RECEIVFT-]
JUL i 0 1981
Trrv or oHANHAssEll
CHANCE
ORDER
- AIA DOCUMENT C7O1
owNtf
ARCHITECT
CONTRACTOR
TITLD
OTHER
tr
D
Dtr
PROJ ECT:
- (name, address)
City Hall - Library
Chanhassen, Mi nnesota 55317 CHANCE ORDER NUMBER: 3
-l ARCHITECTS PROJECT NO: 1014.2
CONTRACT FOR: Complete Cons tructi o n
1980
- ($ 361.00)
$ 498.00
TO (Contractor)
t-
, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416L _l CoNTRACT DArE: June 3,
_ You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract:
1. Provide single service electric in lieu of dual serv.ice as per contractdocuments. (0wners Req ues t )
2. Provide sound attenuation blankets in walls and ceiiings of rooms #206,212, 226, 227, 228, and 229. (0wners Request)
3. Telephone service conduit credit.
lectrical work at Council Chamber. (0wners
utl ets in cabi net
l ourescent Li ght
end Communication Cabl e
Request)
James Leck Company
4915 l,,lest 35th Street
Sui te #101
5. Additional p'i ugmould a reception counter. (
6. Additional electrical receptacles in Council
7. Extra soffit at Council Chamber.
Owners Req ues t )
pl atform. (0wners Req ues t )
4 Extra e
60
1F
Ext
($ leo. oo )
$ 729.00
144. 00
130.00
196 .00
TOTAL ADD $ 1,146.00
The
Net
- The
The
The
- The
The
,900 . 00
,459 .00
,359 00
, 146.00
,505 . 00
(0
oriBina I Co^lrn(l Sum was
change by previous Change Orders
Conlract Sum prior lo lhis Change Order was . .
Contract sum will be (incrcased) d6xltxId0.'Xx,(Xkr0Srflyby this Change Order
new Contracl 5um including this Changc Order will be
Conlracr Time will be (40(X.)fXHXIfleXXdAXfld{ lunchanged) by
Date of Completion as of the date of Ihis Change Order thcrefore is
Boa rma n Archi tects Inc.James Leck Co a
ARCHTTECT 15 South Fifth Street coNTRACToR Suite #101
$
$
s
5
$
E'J 1
E
543
1
544
Minneapo)is, !1N 5540?
;;;J 5 ls-ttusHstffi bre gt--
Minneapolis, MN 55416
) Days
owNrR P.0. Box # 147@
55137
f
Ad
BY /C
BY
DATT z,/t',t.r r- DATt
-Atl Docuurrt c70t . cHANCt oRDtR . ApRL 1970 tDnroN . AtA@ . o 1970 . rHt
AMtRTCAN lNSTtTU',tt Or AnCHlltCTS, 1715 NtW yORX AVt., N\y, WASHtNCTON, D.C. 20006
DATI
ONt PACT
$
$
$
BY
CHANGE
ORDER
AIA DOCUI\4ENT C701
OWNE(
ARCHITTCT
CONTRACTOR
FIFI D
OTHER
trtrtr
tr
PRO,IECT:
(name, address)
TO (Conl racto r)r
Satei I i te Fi re Stati on
Chanhassen, Mi nnesota 55 317
CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 2
ARCH ITECT'S PROJECT NO: 1014.4
CONTRACT FoR: Compl ete Construction
December 29, 1980
$ 494.64
John Kl i ngel hutz ConstructioJ
P.0. Box #89
Chaska, Minnesota 55318
L -J CONTRACT DATE
You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract:
Supply and install a KEN-30, 30 gai lon electric
water heater in laundry room with complete
connections to laundry tub faucet and washer
connecti ons. (0wners Request )
I
The original Contract Sum was
Net change by previous Change Orders
- The Contract Sum prior to this Change Ordcr was
The Contract Sum will bc (incrcascd) (rtg(Xxi€Xf,Xf)ffhx,fof I Uy tr,is Changc Order
The new Contract 5um including this Changc Ordcr will be
Thc Contract Time will bc XXXOX,({IXflffiXlFXfl) (unchan8cd) by
The Dale of Completion as of thc dnte of this Change Order therefore is
Boarman Arch'i tects Inc,- John- l(Ii-nse-l hqtz CanrL
coNTRACToR P.0. Box #Bg owNrR P,0. Box # 147
Chaska, l,linnesota Addrees Chanhassen, Minnesota025 5',]',] R
$
$
S
$
$
147 ,
72,
1EO
450. 00
448.14
898.14
494.64
392.78
(0
160,
) Days
July 15, 1981
C ity of Chanhassen
ARCtrrTtcl 15 South Fifth Street
;;ff@eroft o nrnercr-Bld g.
Mi nneapol'is, Mi nnesota 5S4
uY
DAT t.
BY
- DATT
- Att oocuxtNt c70r ' cHANCt oRDtR . Ap*(. 1970 tDtTroN . AIA@ . @ 1970 . THt
AMtRICAN tNSTlIUlt Or ArCHrItCrS, 1715 Nt\\'yOR( Avt, NW, WASBINCION, O.C. 20006
DATE z/t
ONt PACI
t7
BY
CHANCE
ORDER_ AIA DOCUI,4TNT C7O1
OWN Ef
ARCHITTCT
CONTRN CTOR
FIELD
OTHER
trtr
L]n
Pub'i ic l^lorks Garage
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 CHANCE ORDER NUMBER: 3
_l ARCHITECT'S PRoJECT No: 1014.3
CONTRACT FOR; Complete Cons tructi on
TO (Contractor)r
James Leck Company
4915 West 35th Street
Sui te #101, Mi nneapol i s, Minnesota 55416L __l CONTRACT DArE: June 3, 1980
You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract:
1
2
Relocate NEMA 15-50R outlet from north wall to the east wall of the
vehicle repajr area. (As per Owners Request)
Complete installation of hot water heater as per Nelson-Rudie Drawings
l4R-1, Dated January 9, 198i. (As per Owner Request)
Power feeders to overhead hoist, hoist power pack and compressor.
TOTAL ADD
s 187.00
$ 382.00
$ 2,041.00
3
The
Net
- The
The
The
- The
The
Mi nnpapol i< - MN__5_!10.2 Mi nneao olis - MN 554'16
BY
$
S
s
$
)
320,0
96,0
416 ,0
2,0
418,0
00.00
51.00
51.00
41.00
92 .00
( 0 ) Days
iltv-pl-ei-o.[X!!lcr1owNtR P.0. Box # 147
Address
55317
BYBY.
- DATE I)ATt
-ArA DoCuMtNr c70l . cHANCt oRDtR . ApRrt 1970 IDlrtoN . AIAO . @ i970 . THt MtRTCAN TNSTTTUIt Ot AI(CHtltCrS, 17Jt NtW yOR{ AVI., NW, WASHTN6Tc)N, D.C. 20@6
DATI z/r/ rt
ONt PACT
a
PROJECT:
- (name, address)
$ i ,472.00
Boarman Archi-tect5, Inc. James Le!! Company
-Ircrrncrr rtcr 15 56uth-Fi fth STiEet ir-rxIx,rcron-$uite' #16t
ffi#S. ;.1$ft$S-+es t-35+Htre.et--
oriSina I Contract 5um was
change by previous Change Ordcrs
Contract Sum prior to this Change Ordcr was .
Contract sum will be (increased) fr,XXXXlefrXXr($0XXX by this Change Order.
new Contrict 5um including this Changc Order will be
Contrict Time will bc 0t H06X( X0ffXt+X)€d (unchangcd) by
Dale of Completion as of thc date of this Change Order tlrcre[orc is
Date
CiTY OF CTIAiiI]ASSE::. MII,;i'IESOTA
ESTII'ATE FOR PAY}]ENT ON CONTP}CT
June 2zi, 1!81 Estinate No. Four For perlod trom 5/21 to 6/2,o1
- Narie and Nature of Project No. 78-l 'ilater Supply ilell llo . 4.
CHANGE ORDERS:
D ar,e ApFroved Additions Deductions
TOTAL ADDITIONS . .
SUts TOTAL.
TCTAL DEDUCTIOIIS.
CONT RACT fuYOUNT TO DA.TE
o
77,rt|.OO
0
77 514. C0
.00
rt7.28
4?,28
TOTAL COMPLETED TO DATE. . . .
}{CTERIALS STORED. .. .SSF
TOTAL CO}IPLETED AND STORED .
LL 5I K,TI,.lI!.]AUI
21
1
0
5
$
s
S
S
s
$
S
Dar:e2
,z , ,017 . 11
TOTAL EAR{ED LESS RETAINAGE
LESS PREVIOL,S PAYIqENTS
57 12 .1
ti> I
E> 1 .
EST.
NO.
:':o.
NO.
NO.
A-['tT 21.att .9O EST. NO
ST. NC
ST. NO
L M'F
-l
MT
II\fT
Al'lOUirT DUE TliIS ESTIM}-TE. .
EST . NO. AI4T
EST. No.-Af,!T
AI',17
TOTAL ESEIT1A rES$ 47,474.BL
9 B C.6
- Payrent reouested
June
this 21 day of
--6--=-1-
Approved atht",- 6
nd recommended
dav of Jo,,-r-
for pavrne
, 19
SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.
OR iienner & Sons, Inc.FROJEET EI,GINEEF
o Je
APPROIED:
Jack T. Vos ler
Adclress: 6J00 Industr,T Ave. ll. ,i
Anoka, )iN.55l0J
r/,,
Approveci by City
day of
Council this Bv:
I'(av o r
I9 Bv
C i ty Ilanage r
Percent completed After this Estimate-t
oRIGINAL CoNTRACT AMoUNT .$ 77 15]4:81
'la-o
Y/--
CO
B
.R.ACI
.y't'l
RUSSDLL SMITH ASSOCIATDS, INC.
Reol Estate Apprabers and. Cou.nselors
\\.I'STVT[iTY BUSNXSS CDNTER
6?0 I\ ENDELSSOITN AYTiM]E NORTII . SUITE TSI
I\IINNEAPOLIS, UINNESOT.\ 5519?
OAAE B I LLEO:June 16, 1981
Ci ty of Chan ha s sen
C/0 Mr. Russell H. Larson, Attorney
1900 First National Bank Building
Mi nneapol i s, Minnesota 55402
INVOIEE NO.:27 91
AMOUNT
In Re:Our File #81104
F. J. Kurvers Property
So. side of West 79th
St. just east of
Great Pl ai ns Blvd.
Chanhassen, Mi nnesota
In Re:Our File #81105
Sorenson Property
SE corner of Great
Pl a ins Bl vd.
and l,les t 79th Street
Chanhassen, Mi nne sota
Professional services of Russell C. Srnith
Payment in full wjthin 30 days will be appreciated.
s400. 00
s400. 00
s800. 00
u{
N*
CIIY OF CHANHASSEN
RECEIVED
J(rN 1 I lg8l
COMMUNIIY DEVETOPMENT DEPT.
4{0-\50 -tsol
a0 4-4300
staLement sent
Mr. Donald w.
City Manager
City HaII
7 510 Laredo
Chanhassen,
to:
Ashhtorth
Drive
Minnesota 553I7
FEL SIAIEMt.I''I 11_ 416I
June 5 ,19 8r
IN ACCOUNY WITH
DoRSEY WINOHORSE HANNAFORD, WHITNEY & HALLADAY
23OO FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
M INNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5540 2
(TNTERNAL REVENUE ACCOUNT NO. 4t-O2233371
lN RE: Tax Increment Bonds City of Chanhassen, Minnesota
(AseparateDisbu'sementstatementisoiwillberenderedforourdisbu'sements,ifany'foryoutaccount.)
To legal services rendered from September 1979 Amount
through JanuarY l9 8l-
including legaI research, conferences
and review of documents concernLng
tax j,ncrement financins' ' '
Plus disbursements
I decl-are under
and correct and
the penalties of l" aw that this account is just
iir"t'"" Part of it has been Paid'
$2s1.2s
I .64
TOtA I $2s9.89
Ame ero the partners p ve name
\(
x**
o
(4(J .50-Ae!
Payment due within l0 days of receiPt of statement'
Disbursements made for your account, for which bills have not yet been received will appear on a later statement'
cl'
COORDINATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
8401 WAYZATA SLVD- SUITE 3OO
IV INN EAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426
!t t: ??
:
i
t'
i
:'
'7'.
T L]1
I
.i-
K
Nh
-\50-4':-
$
(-t
I ,'1r
l\
,+(o
0\
1
/-
I
t_
INVOICE
6J\)-T
MINNEAPOLIS CHEYENNE OENVEF
C ity of Chan hassen
7610 Laredo Dr ive
Chanhassen, l4l\ 55317
ATTN: l4r. Scott Mart in
DATE: lt4ay 31, 1981
JOB tO: 62-8020, 18-8001
RE Engineering,/Planning Services for Downtown Development Project as per
Agreement
Per Diem Services - Phase I Work Task 1.7
Continued Consu ltation concerning overall project, developer negotiation,
economic analysis alternatives. Project schedule stud ies, project team rneeting
and revised tax increment sums. Provide fiscal data for bond issue.
Per iod of May, 1981
Classification
Pr inc ipa I
Assoc i ate
Sr. Profess iona I
Technician
Sa I ary Cost - 52,377.19
00
Hours
54.00
4.00
18.7 5
Fee - $2,377.19 x 2,0 =$4,754 .38
CIIY OF CHANHASSEN
Ji/t\ i 2 lggl
C0r\4MUNiry DEVEL0PMENT
/ 1,,/..2(' 5
-
TOTAL AI,,I]UNT DUE
U
,\
fb
ovr
0K
\0,u\
$4 I54 .38
BATHEF BINGFCISE WOLSFELD. JABVIS GAFONER. NC 2A29 UNIVEFSITY AVE S E ti iTNEAPOL S MN 55414 ProNE 6r2 / 379
E.
/
\
1
I
R
ffi,{
CITY OF CTN}iIIASSEN, I4IIiNESCTA
ESTII'ATE |OIi lAYrrlENT ON CONTPICT
Date July 1, 1981 Es t ir:rate No.
Nane and Nature of
Percent Completed
L for period from 5-27-81 Lo
5€&,€-<./
_6.lq-_81-ty'ora,<:-
Proj ect Colonial Grove at Lotus Lake 2nd Addition :i7z€€.s /ao-o"c
After this Es timate 6[t
ORIGINAL CONTRACT A}.IOUNT
CHANGE ORDERS:
No.Date App roved Fdditions Deductions
TOTAL ADDITIONS . .
SUB TOTAL.
TOTAL DEDUCTIONS.
CONTRACT AMOUNT TO DATE
s
s
)
s
s
$
s
s
S
1L
TOTAI COMPLETED TO DATE....
MATERIALS STORED......
TOTAL COIIPLETED AND STORED.
LESS RETAINAGE 9
TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE. . . .
LESS PREVIOITS PAYMENTS. . . .
93 902.10
3
93 902.10
.10
207
.2
9
9
E) r .
r-JI.
NO.
NO.
NO.
NO.
NO.
AMT
AMT
--fi-.26'm1 ESr. No. L\lr
-Ia:I6T.L< ESr. No.---AMr
EST. NO. AMT
AMr 7i)5q!]12 ESr . No. Al'1r
3
A},17
AYT EST. NO. A}IT
TOTAL MTf-I.'A TES
P ROJE
BY:
B
- Pavm.ent requested
July
this 1st day of .APproved and rec
, -f9--8t . Lhis 7 iav of
ommen ed for pa
SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.
INEEF
m Orr
\:ment
,Le _v/_
Fur./ ao((7*-
C
B I.
IDEAT nJTERPRISES, INC.
TRACTOR
tr-\
Acdress: 151 11 Sunmerhill Drive
Eden Prai.rle, MN lflrl!APP RO\TE D :
Approved by
day
City
of
Council this BY:
l,lav o r
ty trlanager
it-
I9 Bv
l
;
. $ 1li5.LL?.2<
1
AMoUNT DUE THIS ESTIM}.TE. ,$._.__:S.SZZ.N-
a.-
CITY oF CITANHASSEN, Mrl'tNESoTA
Date 6/29/el Esti-mate N*o. I For period from 6/ | /Bt to 6/3Aiat
Name and Neture of ploject
Percent Completed After th
Chanhassen, 1.,1N - Well Pum #J & Boosier Pump #3Cifv of
eh ac I
is Es timate
a ion mD rovernen roJ ec i
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
CHANGE ORDERS:
TOTAL ADDITIONS . . .
SU3 TOTAT.
TOT.AL DEDUCTI ONS . .
CONTR.ACT AMOUNT TO D.A.TE
TCTAL COI\IPLETED TO DATE . . . .
\IATFDT LI q C'F'\DFh
TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED .
LESS RETAIN}.GE
TOTAL EAFI.iED LESS RE
I FCC PREVIOUS PAYMENTS .
N-o .Date Approveil A ddltf orr s Dedu ct i ons
) taq \e
4
q
;
C
s
$
s
S
$
5
cll.58
l,:tA ii
r:t
TAl NAGE z./ ( .., (
EST. NO. I
li..:,,j(.,.'-r,
$ryt5:38 EST.NO. AMT
NO. _-AMT
.A.I{T
AMOUIiT DLTE Ti.l I S ESTIM.P.TE.
NO.
NO.
NO.
reguested this
19 e r
EST. NO.AI',IT
FCTF
EST . NO.
_-AI'17
EST. No.-A},7
r-51 .
.i)1-
A]'IT
TOTAL EETTTIA TESS 9.78 1-58 ( i '/.r,j /. ,, r-
. . . . . - S g-++:=sg-l:-/&
P avnen t
J une
day of .Approved
. this 8rh
and recommended
day of July
for pa..'nent
,19_-81_.
LAYNE 14 I lil{ESCTA ccl.,lPANY SCHOELL & }LqDSON, INC,
CONT RACTOR PRO JECT ENGINEER
ay, D A. Ot--,l'r-*
!av id
Address;
By:P,. 4.o# 4a"^-. Tkachen ko
I ld7 Calilornia St.N
R. Scott Harril:I I
l.'inaeapcl is, l'1ti 55418 APPRO\ED:(a*/o.€rp.)z*{z sz-Approveci
day
Citl,
of
Coun c:,I this By:
Nav or
1 9 Bv
City Manager
le
ESTI!'ATE FOR PAYI.IENT ON COIiTRACT
t00 g
-
. . .S rr,gce.co
CTTY OF C}IANIASSEN, MINNESOTA
ESTII,4ATE TOR PAYI1ENT ON CONTR.ACT
Date Ju ly 3, 1981 Estinate No. 3 For ?eriod from 6-l -81 to 5-30-81
Name and Nature of
Percent Comp Ieted
Project MSAS 194-101-04 Street Davinq..Conc. Curb & Gutrer
After this Estimate z
CHANGE ORDERS:
No.oafe Approved ldditions --DEau cafan s
TOTAL ADDITIONS . .
SUB TOTAL.
TOTAL DEDUCTIONS.
CONTRACT A.NTOUNT TO DATE
TOTAL COMPLETED TO DATE. . . . .
MATERIALS STORED.
TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED . .
$(
s
s
$
s
$
s
s
)o1 qt 7 1n
o
r Ecc DF'f lTr-ilcF
TOTAL EAxr\*ED LESS RETAI
LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS. . . .
E
112 626 1S
AJ.,1T
A}17
AIVIT
AI'lOUliT DUE THIS ESTII\4}-TE. .
Al.lT 32
AMT lOO 358.88 EST. NO
EST. NO
EST. NO
EST.
L)I.
EST.
NO.1 267,47 EST. NO . AMT
-A
MT
T IWTI
-a
MT
NO.
NO.
NO.
NO.
2
EST. NO.A}17
TOTAL ESTf_}.1A TES S
Pavnent reouesteo
JulY
this 3 day of lppr
, -T9- 81 this
oved and recommended
3 Ca,z of July
223 .
for pa,,.rnen+-
. -l-9 81
inza SCHOELL & MADSON, INC.
ONT C
By:
Acd re (3 B;r /7
P ROJECT ENGiNEEF
BY:
Ji Orrm
APPROVED:
.Fq.-d s7s -(?=/(')
ApP r ove c by City
day of
council this Bv:
I'lav o r
f9 Bv
ORIGINAL CONTRACT A-I4OUNT '$ ?5a, )^e7.8o
)\A AA1
)01 a/,1
1r} no7 16
-1
a1 ',ALI
7 { f
CiLy Manager
APPTICATION AND CERTIIICATE FOR PNYA4ENT Al .\ l)( )( utrt ]. I r,a
PROIEC T:
(o.rtrr...rddro.(l CI"u^h.,<r,o,. a,-Ul '+t E,',". 11.Ji",.(t44o rA;nnu*":h\^ R"rL".
Clq,^lu7x^ F4N,
)
\R( ilrr( r hl.rc.qn \"\rf..-[s
.\l('tilt( t'( I,k(),t( I \io lou,4
( oNrR,\( roR: -b\" Kli^5zlh"+1
(.ONTRACT TOR:
ulz<lat
!
TO rown('r)
A I'l't ra ilt t()N t).\Tt tn,,,,, tt,,r,. .. r, Z|
AII\
Cl iANCt ORt)tR SUMrlrARy
5..i<r^ Nx\q F Pi R ra)D rRo,\l tt
ORICINAI- CONTRACT SUM . ,
Net ch.rngc by Change Ordcrs
CONTNACT SUM TO DATI ,.,
5lz't ro G rl
pl)lr(atr,)n r< rnldc Ior p,1y,ni,nt,,t\.lrorrrr br.l,Conlinuation Shcct.AlA Do(umcnt C:02A i. .r
rr ilh)W, rn (()nnrr,li.rn
I tilchr.(l
rl,' ( ()rrtrn(l
The presenl status of the account for thrg Contrict is a, iollo,,v.
1 147-,4q,
IZ )\q'l ,1
-1t4, sct.t,7&_
TOTAI. COMPTTTED & STORTD TO DATTlcolumn C on C7O2A)
RT.TATNAcE -Lo-.- ""or ai n()tcd in ('oltrntn I rrn (;:ll.l.\
T()TAt tARNtD t-tss Rt I
^t
N.1(;r
:al.,543,r3_ ___
Net ( h,rnge
TOTAI.S
h\ ChnoSc O(i...IZ q47
LTSS PRTVIOUS CTRTII ICAITS TOR PAYMTNI
C('KRtNT PAYTTTNT DT]E
t3,l.r4
llt) ',Fer,LL
s lC\,8r;o,s], __
j _ l3rsq1?5
,31
t.\
Counlf o,
il dcr(iA^.(l Conr,acror r,, ,:j.., rhrr rhc \Vork co\,1,. I,dl-h(nt hd( bc,.n ( ,rrptcr.,t ,n i(.orrhn(,.r''r,. thni Jll .rm,1r'rr. 1,.,1e h,.,.,r t,i,,l by h,m !.1,. { r.rt.rrr ar' . id. p.,r Lr, L N I.rt. r(\r:r.d an(l pJr mrr.r- rn(, rhrt rhc (!,r.r,ir l,,.tor.nr .h,".. ti.,c,^
.,,r1 l! rh,,
^fl,tr-rvrth rl,r ( r)n trJr I
,r \\irk t,r \\hirh
'nr\ r(.(t.i\ ed lr.m
LI /1"4'Qo'--d-
s4"-\
i"i, iz 1
q ZI
(r k,lr.,
i
P2ypp'iirrr!l hr.(,rn ,rnrl 1.. ,,(!.,nt.c t),r\,n, rr
II tl
Change Orderr approvedrn pr('\.ious nronths by
Orrnt r -TOrAT
\DDITIONS 9
\L)942,1t,
t)EDU(. t toNS i
-(ub.tqucnt Ch.r nqc Oqlert
\umbct
(dalc)+\
\L
i
]'", r \lr\r (,,r, . .\tit.lir \ /,\ i\ I I,rrt, .., ,.r;,t.1.\!. I l\\ir 1,. nr l. I lr\\i\i, ' ''^lllll '" 'I, t.,l'I t-
12,448 ,lq
J.q,uq
a
-rt SCHOELL A, MAESON. INc.
EN GINEEFIS ANO SU FiVEYOFIS
5O NINTH AVE NU E
TO city of Chanhassenc/o Mr. BilI Monk, City Engineer
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
oRDER No. 10875 oare iluly 7, 1981
BILLS DUE UPON R€CEIPT OF S'ATEMENl
2-man survey party
Surveyor, in office
Inspection
Inspection
@ s4e.50e 27.25
@ 22.62
@ 39.OO
g 824.50
13. 63
531.57
273.OO
PLEASE OEIACH ANO RETURN
$t-s42.1_9-
COLONIAL GROVE
June I - June 30, 1981. Staking and inspection.
T7
,2
23\
7
hrs.hr.hrs.
hrs .
o
oRoER No. 10875
€iCHc]ELL t MAE}EC}N. rNc
_fl sk
tu-t
lr/(/
ATLLS DUE UPON RECEIPT OF STATEN4ENT
@ s23.25@ 23.65
PLEASE DEIACH AND REIURN
$ 116.25
59L.25
352. OO
sL-95_9,L0.
Engineering services in connection with the
preparation of a feasibility study forthe improvement of Lotus Trail.
Draftsman
DraftsmanPrincipal Engineer
5
25I
hrs.
hrs .hrs.
€-q
fisbI
t0l- I
oRDER No. 1
E
.\ny r.:iouni i;C d1r3 or
olaor t, 111 be lubJool
io s 1.,: month:,y
FINANCE CIIARCE at a&
ANFT'AL PERCL\TAGE
RATE ot 13X.ACHOELL 8!. tvlAoelON, rNc.t /r/ rr
SOUTH . HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 . PHONE S3A.76O,I
. .. .'., -'.rouii i ;C Jaya or
,1.:e: ?j,1.]" :a suc.l aoi
to a. Lt" i:onlhli
FI:IANCS CII.AF.Gi aii an.
ANNUAI P3RC;IiT,'.Gi
:L\T: oJ i:ii.
1/t"t €r'*/
SCHOELL & MADSoN, INc.
EN GIN EEFIS ANO SUFIVEYOFS
5O NINTH AVENUE SOUTH . HOPKINS, MTNNESOTA 5S343 . pHONE 938_76O1
TO City of Chanhassen
c,/o yLr. Bitl lvtonk, City Engineer
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
ORDER NO. 8379 OATE ,July 6, 1981
BILLS DUE UPON RECEIPT OF STATEMENT
MSAS IOI Pro i ect
,June I June 30, I98I. Staking and inspection.
2-man survey party
Inspection
Inspection
I nspection
2-man survey party
Inspection
Dra fti ng
Drafting
Draf ting
Dra fti ng
Draf ting
hrs.
hrs.
hrs.
hrs .
$ 266.75
L32.67
972.66
546.OO
PLEAS€ OETACH AND RETU R N
$ I94.OO
90.48
56.94
63.90
885.50
632. 03
712.73
sa^-q35,5.q
41t L
5\
6\
43l4
@ $48.s0
@ 39.00
hrs.
hrs.
hrs.
hrs .
hrs.
hrs.
hrs.
_ oRDER No. 8379
SCHOELL B. MAOEION.TNc.
I]ILLS DUE I.]PON RECTIPT OF STAIEMTNT
$L 9ls,_09
/r
3 47t2-
7 +'L-
4
4
3
3
38\
26Lz
25,i
G) s4B.50
o 18.98
@ 21.30o 23.OO
o 23.85
o 27.95
Any e.nount 30 da,ys o!
olCar \rt 11, to subJoot
!o a li: tronthl,y
FINANCE ClllP,GE at an
AIINUA.L PERCENTAGE
&{i0 of 13X.
onoen no. IO84O
-
C]rY HALL SITE
April I - June 30, 1981. Restake parkj.ng: inspection;
complete the drafting of as-built p1ans.
SCHOELL tl. MAOSON. rNc.
en-|
k ltr
SCHOELL & MADSON, tNc.
ENGINEETiS ANO S U RVEYO FI S
5O N INTH AVENUE SOUTH . HOPKINS. MTNNESOTA 5S349 . pHONE SgA-76o1
TO City of Chanhassenc/o l{.r. BilI Monk, City Engineer
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55 3I7
oerr July 7. I9B1
BILLS DIJE UPON RECEIPI OF STATEMENI
Inspec tion
Inspection
Registered EngineerPrincipal Engineer
24 hrs. @2 hrs. @
21L trrs. @3 hrs. @
onoEn rio. 11163
ACHOELL &. MAOE,ON.TNc.
PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN
I 542.88
78. OO
688.OO
32. OO
sI .440 - 8a
June I - June 30, 1981. Inspection and engineeringin connection with 1rlet I No. 3.
s22.62
39. OO
32. OO
44.oo
a-5 t D>-LII tr,4t
riJj rot
o
l:nru..& PrRCitiT..,c;
R.\IE of 1.3,;.
t/r/ r7
BTLLS DUE UPON AECEIPT OF STAIEIVENT
WELL NO. 4
June 1 - June 30, 1981. InsPection.
PL€ASE OETACH ANU HL I UXT!
Inspection
Inspect j.on
39
4
hrs. @ $22 .62
hrs. @ 39.00
$ 882. r.8
156. OO
$r...q3€..fe
t/r/
- 4t sz-'
//.in7 Srcrrnt 3O dayS ofr)i,-lr. !i.LI br) 3ubJ oog'.J:t i, nonr-h l "FrliA:rc! c;{ARc; rt an.
I}INUA.L FERCENIACE
R.{Te of ]AX.
onorn ruo. lOO96
SCHOELL & MAOSON,TNc.
-7
I 6-3
oRDER No. 11L63
SCHOELL A, MADSON, INc.
ENGINEEFlS ANO SUFIVEYC)trS
50 NINTH AVE NU E SOUTH . HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 . PHONE 93A.76O1
TO city of Chanhassenc/o l{Lr . BiII Monk, City Engineer
Chanhassen. Minnesota 55 3I7
ORDER NO. 11]87 DATE JuIy 6, l98L
rl.n',r 3:o',r:1i:0 Clyo oro1dcr.:tfL be subJ ect
to a .L ^; i,iontl:iy
FIllA"\iCt CUAi!: rt rrr.
ANNUAI PE:iCENTitGE
RAI! of 1?t.
/4 t0)u
Draftsman
EngineerPrincipal Engineer
hrs. @ S23.65hrs. @ 23.85hrs. @ 44.oo
s520.30
95.40
132 . OO
sL!L_L9.
€sz-reu-)
*z rz-L
oRoER No. If187
ACHOELL &. MAOE|ON,TNc
BILLS DUE UPON RECEIPI OF STATEMENT PLEASE DETACH ANO RETURN
April 8, 198I - ,June 2, 1981. Engineering serviceg
in connection with the proposed sanitary sewer
and watermain to serve the Chanhassen American
Legion including work on feasibility study and
preparation of maps and cost estimate.
22
4
3
tfv/ry
7,
- WILLIAM D SCHOELL
CAPLISLE MADSON
JACK T VOSLEH
JAMES A. OFF_ HAROLD E, DAHLIN
LARFIY L HANSON
JACK E. GILL
THEODORE O KEMNA
- JOHN W EMOND
KENNETH E AOOLF
WILLIAM R ENGELHAROT
F. SCOTT HAFRI
- GEBALO L EACKMAN
ilu,u"^
scHoELL * *fJLuif,l:gt
""
ENGTNEERS aNo su".VE'.oRS "'t148s[il
To City of chanhassenc/o Mr. BilI llonk, City Engineer
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
MisceLlaneous engineering services, llay 1, 1981 ,fune 30 , I981 :
c ehens iv P , including revision of same.
]8IL hrs. @ 928.00Engi neer
- -, Work on the preparation of base maps for storm sewer,t,"fi, and sanitary sewer.
t;- llt Draftsman 5 hrs. @ S23.25 $116.2543co Draftsman l7 hrs. @ 23.65 4O2.O5
- i Prepare right-of-way easement description and drawing for
/:fvt'e' easement across the Barnett property in Section 2,'e -t' Township 116, Range 23.
Surveyor 4 hrs. @ S28.60
,V{ M""tlr:g re Near I'lountai
. r4r' xegistered Engineer
- Itleetings, response repo
with Fox Chase. t/Z
Registered Erglneer '2- / 3
t
(612) 938-7601 . 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH . HOPKINS. MINNESOTA s5343
July 6, I98I
95 ,082. O0
518. 30
1L4.40
G
n project.
3 hrs. @ S44.OO
rt and moreieetings in connection
z--t,-z' t-.-- / f- tt.1,-- --* r-l/,n t._-- ,1..n. ?bO - - y' 3c.>33 hrs. @ S44.O0
. ,-.,-/ ylu"ting re Minnetonka. Inc. pro ject.
"'Jn4' a"gi.tered Engineer 4 hrs. @ g44. oo
MiscelLaneous meetings r"ri th Metro Council, IIRA,
LF\S Recreation comnission, etc'
' Engineer 7! hrs. @ S2B.OORegistered Engineer t3 hrs. @ 44.OO
Park and
I32. OO
I ,452.OO
I76. 00
7A2.OA
$q256J-q
Order No. 712O
Total
. -;Jt
E
$21o. OO
572.OO
oF ER No. 10875-T
50 NINTH AVENUE
SMI TESTING
SOUTH. HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343. PHONE Offic€:938-76O'l
Lab: 938-6 7 22
TO City of chanhassenc/o Ylr. Bil]' Monk, city Engineer
chanhassen, Mj.nnesota 5531?
oett ? /a/81
AI-J DUE UPON REC€IPT OF STATEMENI
COLON]AL GROVE.t.or testing services (Tests Nos. 8 through 13) per
attached report.May 20, I98I - June 2, 198I.
PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN
soils Engineer
SoiLs Inspector
Mi Ieage
4l hrs. @ $23.Oo19 hrs. @ L7.6520 mi. @ o.2o
rf rlrr
+15?
_ F?ECEIVEI]
JUL . 9 19BI
vlTY 0F CHANHASSEN
AN amoun, JO doys ot old"r rill b. subict to a I . I 139*, nonhllt
I-INANCE CHAAGE ot a" ANNUAI- PERCENTACE RATE ol l69c
NAI-YSIS OF ACCOUNT
442.85
onorn r.ro. 1o87 5-T
SM] TESTING
91o3. 50
335.35
4.OO
$!32.&
, .,.. /
b05
tl I I I I
PROII,CT:
(name, addretsl
APPLICATION AND CERTITICATE FOR PAYMENT AtA DOCt)ptrNr .io),.1,1 916 66 4 2'
ARcHlrEcr: Boarflan Archi tects lnc.
7.l0 Charnber of Cormerce 8i dg . '
ARCHIT€CT'S PROITCI NO:
Fpls HN 55402
CONTRACIOR: Jatnes Leck Corpany
3033 Excelsior Blvd., l'lpls i'ltl 55416
coNTRAcT foR'Pro3"ct "8" - Public llorks Garage
AppLlcATtoN DATE: 7 /6/81 Appt icATtoN No 12
P€RIOD TROM:s/1/81 ro 6/30i81
ORIGIHAT CONIIACT sUM 320 ,000 .00
.t 96 ,051 . 00
'8"Pub I ic l,,lorks Garage
TO {O\sner)Ci ty of Chanhas sen
Chanhassen, t'ltl 55317
ATl N
CTIANCT OR,DTII SUMIIARY
Chrnf,. otderl aPProvcd
in priviou: monthr bY
Ownar -TOTAL
,..DOlTIONS t DTDUCTIONS 1
t Ch.nteOtde.!Subrequeo
Numbtr Appro!.d
td.rc)
79,215
'I 6 - 8',r6
I OIAt-S
96,05'l
AoDlication i5 made lor Payment, as shown below, in ('rnnectron \ailh th' Contr'ct
Cbirtlnultioo sh*r, AtA Docun"tl G7o2A, r5 ettached
Th? prasent 5titus of the account {or lhi5 Contra(t ir a! followt'
N?t changc by Change Order:
416,osr . oo
1
2
CONTFACT SUM TO D^TI ,
4t6,05r.00
couFt' ot llennePi n
TOIAT COM?T"EIED & STORTD TO DATT
(Column C on G702A)
NETAIN,\GE
-%
or as noled in Column J cn G:02A
TOTAI. TARNTD IISS RETAINACI ,, "
ttss P,qtvlous ctRTlflcATEs foR PAIMtNT
-0-
\et ahar8c by ChanSe Orderr I 416,051.00
t
t
t
!
Ui nnPsota 392 ,899. C0
(,rt,r,r icr P.)nre
pr.vi.,r! CF, i'(.
rh. ()*ne.. rnd I
( oni(!(t.,r ccrriiias !hdl lhc \Ao.l (r)v''rd 5v rl" r '^' pri_
nt rrar bccn (onrDlcl?C ,r acr:ordrnre with thc ( ' ^lr.cr
"if "",.-tt ha'c bctn pa,d b! him Ior worl ioI '\i'i"h
it. ior l.rvment v'ere ilsucd Ird pJYmenlt re(e'r?d l'om
h!! ile (J'rant patment shoran hcrern rr now dur'
23,r52.00
CURF Ei'IT PAYMI NT DUE
8l6th a., o1 Ju 1.y
Hrbrcribed end !{oto lo befotc mc lh'r
Con i, r.J nEs Leck C v Not.ry PUblic:
l.iy Con.mrrii.r .xPire3 I'
JdNrc€ J\
;
tiv.
fhii Ccllrfi
I
te I /g/gl
m-ent thc Contr.ctor it e'\t'lltd !o
::#Sf JtsslerlLc;-:*tj-!t-:__-c=
;.r; " ,h".."r* .1'3P5 gSqqtssioq Erpires Jrn' 23' leqTowNtR
cl Ai{o IItcT
Ll coNrRACtOt
!
tr
,\r(llilecl
rnd i!! ii!'r.oc., prym.at.nd .<tcpt.n(e rrc withoul p
Ata tx).tiM.Nt c7t1 . AFPLICAIIOH ANO CtS,IttlCATt tot PAYMINT 'MAIO{ 1971 tDlI'ON . AIAC
.e,udicc lo .nY rithtr of tht Op1r.r or Con!; !1lor undet tltl. C
I rortolsd
I r vrsled
)2,
II
AFPLICATION AND CERTITICATT
PROJECI:
(name, address)
Ci ty Ha11/Library
IO (C)wner)Ci ty of Chanhassen
Chanhassen, MN 5531 7
CllANCt ORDTR SUM/'IiARY
FOR PAYMENT AtA DoCUivtlt"t r..io?
N?t ch.n8c by Chrngc Orderr . ...
ARCHIT€CT: Boarman Archi tec ti inc
7'!0 Chamber of Co!'rnerce Bldo,. tlpls Ht{ 55402
ARCHIIECT'S PROITCT NO:
CONTPACTOR JanEs Leck Company
3033 Excelsior Blvd., r'lpls Hll 554rf
CONTRACT fOR Projec t "A"City llall/LibrarY
APPUCArlOr.i NO l2APPITCATION DAT[: 7 /6/81
PtRroD rRoM: 5/1 l8l ro 6/3tl8l
ORICII]AT CONTRACT SUM
5,459.00
If,r,)'.t Or 4 P
Application is made for Payment, as:ho$n bslo*', in conar(r:cir ^'ii' thc Contr'cl-
Cbirtingetion Sheel. AIA Do(umcnt G7024, is atta'hed'
Ttrc present status of the accoun! for thit Conlrlcl [ '! f'll':!v'i'
r13l-re flc. iJo
......t
I)80
80
10t16/
11 / 18i
690.00
4 .769. 00 CONTRICT SUM TO DATT
TOTAT COMPTEITD & SIOEID TO DATE
t(:olurnn C on G702.\)
RttAtNACr .---e"
or.r. nDt€C in Column I on Ci02A
TOTAT EARNTD LIS9 REIAIT'JACE . '
ttss PRtvlous ctRnrlc^Tts foR PA)}lENT
CURRTNT PAI'M[ I':I DLIE
E.1 ) :;);'r'i!'_:': " -
-n-
IOTAtS ,459.00N€l (h.n8e by ch.n8. Ord.rs 1af ,l:e,!!
515,t91.001
sr.r" or Hj nnesota colnry or' Hennepi n
rl.. ' n.l.rj,!ned Conlr.clo, (.rlrliet t\.1 lhe Wu'k rove'ed I'r rh'r Anplr'
..r,.i i"r p'"trn"^r hrr be^n (cmpl.t?d rn rcco'drnre w'lh lh" Con!rr(t
L^.,,.""tt ,iri"rl .mounrr h.v? bee{r p.rd bY him lor worl {or $hich
p,.''orr C.rr,t,crres ,or PaYFant $'erG '5tued 'nd
p'Ymcnlt rece':ed irom
ir," r,r,""r. a^d lh,)t ih? cutrenl p.vr.enl rhown hcrern 's now due'
Subrcrrbed lrd two.n lo b.forc me rh't 6th d:Y o' ']r;
Bv .,t
James Lec k p v
7 tb/81
:manl I
15 S.4.lh ffih St€€l
3r-t752
\r! ( o6mri( on arD'res
Cootraalor ir enlillad to orymenl rn the.tfiounl
r(\icE L. o,
.MY.[::f
.,:
/" ^,/n,,,,rlcC
d
I
""'
::tF
a r( flrl C(f
a. \:,TRAcloR
iy
Thr. C.rli .ncc rr. wrlhoul oi"iud!.! to.nY ,rtrl( ot tF! r)*'_r 1'
' "\r '' ot rn,t(.r dr'lt r
In and ilr irlurna?, plymant rhd rc<apl
OEOUCTIONS 3AODITIONS
'Chinte Ord.B aPProved
in prevrorrg monlhs bY
Owncr -TOTAI-
App.o1'ed
{d.ic)
Numbct
Al^ DoauMltll G:l, . AF IIC-AIION AND CERIlfl'-ATt tot PAYMINI- '- MARCH 197t tOlTlCiN '^r16
ttllllllllltl
ATTN:
S.rbsequent Chan3a Order
I
I
CITY. OF
ffiEflffiBfrEflffi$$HhT
pi
P],ANNING REPORT
TO: Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Bob Waibel, City planner
DATE: July J., 1981
SUBJ: PIan Amendment, preljjninary and
Review, CPT Corporation.
PLANNING CASE: 81-3 PTe App
Final Development Pl-an
Pe t iti on
The applicant is requestj.ng the above mentioned subject approvalsfor the construction of a first phase 150,000"square foot light
as sembly-manufacturing plant on an approximate 69.3 acre parcelin the southern half of Chanhassen located in Hennepin County.
Backoround
2
l
3
Community Location: As shown in enclosure l, the subject. pro-perty i.s an approxi-mate 70 acre parcel located in the southernhal-f of the portion of the City of Chanhassen that lies in
Hennepin County .
Existing Zoning: The subject property j-s presently zoned P-3,
Planned Corununity Devefopment District. The property directtywest of the subject property, north of Chanhassen Estates, ispresently zoned C-2, Corunercial District. Chanhassen Estatesis presently zoned R-1, Single Family Residential District.
The lands surrounding the subject property within Eden Prairie
are planned to assume and maintain residential identity.
Utilities: Presently sanitary sewer and mr.rnicipal rvater service
are available to the subject property which is located within
the right of way of the frontage road accessing the subject
property. I{atermain service consists of a 12'
watcrmain and sanitary sewer service consists of a combination
of an 8' and I5r gravity sewer.
4. Comprehensive Plan Proposals:
a Land Use: Pursuant Lo the 1990 Comprehensive PIan Lane Use
(rl-.
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147 . CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937- 1900
July 1, I98I
CPT Corporation
Page 2
Comments
b
map, the subject property is to assume and maintain andindustrial identity.
Transportation: The transportati-on section of the chanhassenComprehensive plan indicates that ultimatelyr tf," i.""t:-
1S"-Igu9 presently accessillgthe property is to BL extenaeato l84th Street at the_eastern boundary- of the pr"p;rar:--In the most recent reviews of the ,r"w itighway ZiZ |rogiamit had been dj.scussed that one of the primar!, finXi fiomsaid new 272 to Chanhassen would possiify le- located inthe vicinity of 184th Street. Thi; is 6ased upon the ulrimareselection of the northerly alternative of propoled 2L2.'---"
Detail analysis of utilities, drainage and transportation arefound in the attached City Engineers report.
The subject property was original-ly zoned p-3 in 1972 for corunerciar,Industrial and residential ltnd ,=i"ge. In 1975, the Citv ofchanhassen subsequenrly approved a dgvel6p;;"4'pi; fii'mu:-tipreresidential, commerciar, and recreational tind uses. on ]tlarch 20,1978 a preliminary development plan was approved for MTS to con_:tryg! a first phase 160,000 square foot oif i-c-elmanutacluiingfacility in a similar fashion to the present CpT proposal. Oneof the conditions of approval was that the east aira i"rest sl-ope ofthe drainage swai-1 located in the southwest corner of the propertybe dedicated for open space.
The city council has schedured a public Hearing for the considerationof placing a portion of the subject property iito a tax increment
3i:.:1:::. r_f adopted, -this would poi"r,ti-rry assisr rhe ciry inEne needed upgrading of the drainage swaLe l0cated in the so-uthwesterncorner of the subject property and the ultimate extension of *.frontage road to 184th Stieet-.
As Previousry stated, the MTS pran amendrnent vras conditioned uponthe dedication of the southwesierly drainage area for opelr spacepurposes. This office feer.s that iuch a d6dication is irot essentialto the open space needs of the city and shourd not be consideredas part. of the required commerc ia17 industrial parf a"aiciiiorr.Although it is not presentry known wrreitrer a pedestrian trair. wourdbe necessary or desirable in the vacinity of ine drainage iwafe,r recorunend thar the cirv obrain the abiiity ro p;;;i;ii-c;nsrructa pedestrj-an facility as part of the current. plai approiral.
The plans submiLted by the developer indicate the extension of thefrontage road to traverse the soulhwesterry corner of the farmstead.Iocatcd near the north central portion of tne property. sincef inal design of this extension iras not been un-derlakei-r as of yet,such can be consid.ered nothing more than concepcual at this point.
((
JuIy 1, I98I
CPT Corporation
Page 3
The same status should be appliedproperty line which is illistratedof the attached p1ans.
along the southerly
"future planning"
to the road
on shcet 4
As shown in the applicants letter of June 19, 1981, g5t of theproposed faciJ.ity will be for manufacturing pu.rposes, and 15?of the facility witl be office. Representativei of Cpthel-d a meeting with residents of Chanhassen Estates and it wasnoted to staff that their primary concern was the impact oftraffic on the j-ntersection of Dakota Avenue and Hwy 5. Furtheranalysis of traffic impact are found in the City Engineers reportand the Westwood Engineering report dated June lG, 199I.
The first phase buildi.ng will be constructed of precast walfpanels colored beige. Gxeat attention has been made to minimizethe visual impact of the building to the Chanhassen Estatesresidents tlrough a curt:rinaticrr of location, setbacks, L6rns, plantjllgsand use of existing vegj-tation. The City of Eden prairie staffhas revieweal the subjed. plan and have rEquested that berms andplantings be continued south of the buj.lding and the parking areato aid j-n screening for the future residential area to the southof CPT phase one.
The applicants landscape pJ-an indicates the intention to reestablj-shnative prairie grasses in the open areas surrounding the buildj-ng.
As the subject property is approached via the frontage road. from
Dakota Avenue, there is a noticable border on the south side ofsaid frontage road consisting of conifers. This office suggeststhat several cgQnifers be planted on the southerly side of the
frontage road as it accesses the subject property to contj-nue -this theme between said existing connifers west of the subjectproperty and those proposed in greater numbers as the frontage
road approaches the entryway to the CPT facility-
The appljgant has schematicalty indicated tentative future expansionof the facility to the north and east of phase one. Both staff
and the applicant agree that due to CPE rapid growt.h, it is
most difficult to speculate in great detail what the overall
nature & form of future expansion may be. Both the staff and
the applj.cant have agreed that future expansion would be subject
to similar plan amendment review and the ability to provide
necessary Public services.
At the time of writj.ng this report, a detailed sign plan was
not available for consideration. As such the applicant wilI be
required to obtain a1I appropriate sign permits through the Sign
Committee and City Council.
The subject proposa] has been submitted to the City Fire MarshaIl
for public safety needs. Although a final response has noc bcen
writtcn as of yct, an initial recontmendation has been made that
the applicant provide fire lancs at, tlle front entry r^ray of thc
building. Thil will result in removal of some parking spaces
in the visitot parking area, however, the number of spaces to be
removed is not yet determinable.
JuIy 1, 1981,
CPT Corporation
Page 4
Rec ommendat ion
I recommend that the pLanning Comrnission recorunendCouncil, approve the plan amendment, preliminary, andelopment plan for phase one of the CiT facility'w:_tfrconditions:
the Cityfinal dev-the following
tr ian
en Sicet the
way
1y
I That the applicant agree that if in the future a pedesway connection is deemed desireable or necessary betweMarsh Lake park and south Highway 5 frontage ro;d, thacity be given the ability to-conitruct said pea"sirainin the vicinity of the dlainage way in the sauthwesterPortion of the property.-,,-/l .-r :- ji ;". Li / !.r r .. !i;tn
2
J
That the exterior 1ighting of the proposed facility be ac_complished brith shielded high presiur6 sodium fixtires.
That the perjreters of .aL1 driving, parking, and maneuveringareas be constructed with a concrete- cttrve. _.,, ,
4 That the berm and landscaping be continued along the south_ern edge of phase one building ind parki.ng as requ6sted byEden Prairie staff provided that thlre is-no advdr"" i*piltupon drainage or future plans for expansion and traffic'c irculation
That the final developmentthe City Engineer regardingutilities.
That the final devel-opment ptan incorporate any additionalrequirements reconmended by the City fire MarshaLl.
That before a building permit is issued that the applicantcertj-fy !" !!g City that any and all necessary pCA iermitsfor the handling and/or stoiage of hazardous -or toxic sub_stances have been obtained.
plan satisfies all- of the concerns oftran sportati-on , drainage, and
6
7
(
CITY.CF
ffi[flffiffi[ilfi$ffiffihT
690 COULTEH DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147 . CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ:
The
CPT
Planning Commission
Bill Monk
July 2, 19 81
CPT
following j.s a review of the
manuf acturing f acility :
engineering aspects of the proposed
Transportation
The -appli-cant proposes- to connect a private drive to the existing frontageroad originating on Dakota Avenue. this creates a single access situationfor an industry estimating 330 day-shift emproyees. 86cause Dakota Ave.is presently the singre access foi approxi*"teiy 130 residentiar lots inchanhassen Estates, the appricant prepared the ittached Traffic rmpactAnalysis. After review of said trattic study, r believe Dakota Avenuecan handre the proposed traffic increase under the folJ.owing conditions:
1). Dakota Ave. bet\,reen T.H, 5 and the frontage road. be restripedto all-ow for 3 traffic .r-anes. Two ranes north6ound (one rane for rightturns and one rane for straight or reft turns) and one lane southbound.
2l . MNDor be requested to change the signar. operati-on so westboundT.H. 5 traffic wishing to turn south on Dakota Ave. may do so on thegreen balr whire yierding to oncomi.ng traffic after thL green arrov,expires.
3). Consideration be given to including a pedestriansignal cycle to serve pedestrian and bicyclL trafficEstates and the dor,rntown area. this couid be buttonthe walk cycle only as reguired-
4). A temporary cul-de-sac shall-frontage road to provide for turnmalntenance.
crosswalk to the
bet\../een Chanhassenactivated to operate
be constructed at the east end of thearound movements and proper wintcr
5)..-No €xpansio.l or addit.ional development of t.he pr:operty shall occuruntil secondary access to T.H. 5 is prividcd (nameli, i.fre lxtensi.onof the frontage road to 184th Street and l8.tth Streai to T.H.5).
-t
t
Sanitary Sewer
Watermain
A 21" sanitaryprovide service to the
sewer l inefacility.along the west property line will
the frontage road shall service the facility.
Storm
DfP waternain in
Sewe r
Because of the scope of the proposed facility, on-site retention of .,.rno,-,is required, As detailed on +L Si"ai"S and-drainage plan, a pondingarea is proposed near the southeait "".iur of the parking rot with acontrorled outlet arl0wing the overfiow to drain to the southeast. with -this pran, cpr ,,rou,d not 6e ar"i"i"g-i"y,addirional ;;;oii-;o rhe exisrir.;sware alons their west propertv rine, -iia-w""ra, -i" i.iiil-u" reducingthe tributary area by. approxim.t":.y o.,u
-(1) acre as a result of the site _gradins. This is de;ir;;le d";-a;'tie conaitio,., or tr.,"-"ii"ti',g svale.Cit), approval of the plan will be conditioned upon WatershedDistrict approval and condi.tions.
gr/lt;,/.c.,.LL-
(
I{INTJIES OF THE REq,IAR
GiANHASSBI PTANNING CCIE,ESSIOI{ MEETING
HED JIILY I , 1981, AT 7:30 P.M.
CIIANHASSEN CITY HALL
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Staff Present:
Plan Anendment ,
Chairman Art Partridge, Carol Watson, LaddConrad, Walter Thompson, and Jim Thompson
Howard Noziska and Mike Thompson
Bob Waibel, Bill l'lonk and Becky Foreman
PreI im j-nary Development Plan Fina l-Deve fopmentP1an, and Site PIan Review, CPT Inc . ,Publ ic Hear j-nc1:
Waibel read the staff report to thereviewed the actions that have beenpast.
Planning Commissj.on. Hetaken on the lot in the
The property owners within 350' were notified of this meetj-ngand no one was present. Dave Sellegren, a representative ofPark Two, stated that they had called a meeting with the neigh-borhood sending out 142 notices and only 9 people came to themeeting. The neighbors main concern was the traffic but thatwas explained to their satisfaction that traffic hrill not beas bad as they thought.
Regarding the vegetation, CPT plans to preserve as many treesas possible. Staff recotnmended that they pl_ant several additionalconifers by the frontage road west of the lroposed building.
CPT indicated that they would do that.
CPT is going to provide 1 parking space per every employee onthe main shift, that should provide for more than they need.They wj-Il have approximately 330 employees on the main shift..
A motion was made by W. Thompson seconded by Watson to closethe public hearing for the reason that CPT has met with the
neighbors prior to this meeting and none of the neighbors cameto the meeting so they must not have any probtems with CPTrsproposal-. AlI voted in favor and the motion was carried.
Conrad asked if the intersections witl be a problem based onfuture growth? Sellergren indicated that the Engineers have
looked into this and they feel that the intersections are builtto handle the growth.
J. Thompson asked if CPT's new buiJ,ding will effect the sewage
capacity that l4etro has set for Chanhassen? BilJ- I4onk, City
Engineer, indicated that this proposal will not put us over the
nunler by Metro Council. 330 employees is the quivalent to
approximately 30 homes.
Sellegren stated that the overland drainage pattern to thesoutheast would be maintained and a retention pond would beconstructed to catch the water from the hard surfaces.
Planning Commission MinutesJuly 8, 1981
Page 2
Watson asked r^rhat types of toxic waste dothey treat it? Sellergren indicated thatbut nothing \"/ill be going into the sewer.for it.
Approva I of Minutes:
Conrad stated that at meetings where
comments the Plannj-ng Commission hastheir names -
J, Thompson made a motion seconded by Watson to move to theapproval of minutes section si.nce the pl_anning Colunission wasahead of schedufe. A11 voted in favor and the motion was carried.
they
they
CPT
have and dovriIl have soldering
has a permit
J. Thompson asked how much land area does the building take up?Sellergren indicated that it wiII be 30t of 22 acres.
Partridge asked what the exterior lighting wi1l, be fike. Waibelindicated that 1t is to be consistenL with Chanhassen's. Thelights vrill be on the building and in the parking 1ots, the lightingis more for security reasons rather than fir adv6rtising.
w. Thompson made a motion seconded by conrad to recorunend to thecity council to approve the plan ameidment and final a."ur"p*""tp1an, phase 1 of CpT with staffs recommendations as listed LnJuly 1, 1981 Planning Report along with Exhibit A dated June 18,1981 with the exception that condition #3 be changea tiom-curveto curb. AIl voted in favor and the motion was cirried.
the public is giving theirto make sute that they state
W. Thompson made a motion, seconded by Conxad to approve themj.nutes of June 17, 1981. Partridge, w. Thompson ind Conradvoted aye, Watson and J. Thompson abstained, motion carried.
A motion was made bythe mi-nut.e s of June
was carried.
watson seconded by W. Thonpson to accept24, 198).. All voted in favor and the motion
Motion made by J. Thompson, seconded by Conrad to note theminutes of the June 15, 1981 City Counc j.I Meetings.
A11 voted in favor and the motion carried.
W, Thompson made a motion seconded by Conrad to note the CityCouncil minutes of June 22 ar.d 24, I98l- AIt voted in favor andthe motion was carried.
CITY OF
EH[NH[SSEI{
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147 . CHANHASSEN, N,IINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
I{EMORAND U}4
TO:
FROM :
DATE:
Don Ashworth, City Manager
Bill Monk, City Engineer
JuIy l-6, 1981
CPT UpdateRE
After reviewing the grading and drainage plans submj.tted by
CPT and then reviewing the condition of the swale along their
west property Iine, I forwarded the attached letter, dated
Juty I, to the watershed District. This letter was intended
to inform the District of my position as they conducted a pre-
Iiminary review. watershed District conunents of the pl-an
are detail-ed in the attached correspondence dated July 7.
An obvious item of contention concerns CPTts liability in regards
to upgrading the existing swale as it crosses the west edge
of their property.
I met with representatives of CPT and watershed District staff
on July 15 to request clarification of the Districtrs position.
They are firm in their belief that CPT is responsible to improve
the svrale as it crosses the site in order to eliminate a1l
sediment runoff from CPT Property. The scope of the required
Jmprovement is questionable but a short-tenn soluti-on may be
acceptable to the District.
Because of the accelerated timetable under which the CPT devel-
opment is proceeding, CPT may wish to submit some type of short
term improvement program to the Watershed District at their
hearing in early August. It appears the only other alter-
nativei available are for the City to oppose the watershed
District's condition, thus jeopordizing the construction starting
date, or to "guarantee" the improvement of the entire swale
between the fiontage road and Rice Marsh Lake. It should be
noted that down stream sections of the swale (south of CPT)
are severely eroded with exposed sections of electrical conduit
and Metro sanitary sewer forcemain.
The City Council is to discuss enlarging tax j-ncrement
distrj.cl No. 2 to include the cPT proPerty at the JuIy 27 meeting'
and improvement of the swale is included in that PIan'
t'.
July 1, 19 81
RE: CPT Development
Dear Mr. Obermeyer:
SincercLy,
;dZ-.,-.-'>z-.,
VIi ] Iiarn i.!onkCit:/ trnginccr
CITY OF
rX,KhTEfffiffiffiffihT
' i, ;. /,.'
'/Jr'-'*
1f ,/rr
a.- I
690 COULTER DBTVE C P.O. BOX ,t47 O CHANHASSEN, I.,4INNESOTA 55317(612) 937-1900
I'1r. Robert C. Obermeyerc/o Barr Engineering
6800 France Avenue Sout.hEdina, MN 55443
B":=y..9 of_the scope of proposed facility, CpT representativesani this off i.ce have agreed that on iite retention of runoffis necessary. As detailed on the itti"i.r.a grading and draj.nagepran, a sonding area is proposed ";;-airu sorrEheast corner of thepar.<ins ror with a contror-lid ourlet ailowing *,"-"rJiiiJi t"dr3 ir to the southeast - with this pr"" , cpr ,outd not re
-'ara:.n:_ng
any additicna.l- runor-f :? tl. existing -wa1e along tir"ir-r".tpnoperty li_ne, and would, in fact, b5 reducing Cf,"-t-;il";;;yarea by approxir,larely one (1) acre as a resuri, .i-tir"-Iitl'grading.
Based on the site gracling_an<l drainage pIan, this office wasl::,:"::::::?..r" ::!uire cpr to i:nfi5ve'rhe dirch as it crois,esLrrerr prcperEy. l-nstead, staff is presently reviewing neihoos toperf orrn the necessary d1!ch "pgr".li-, j-" " " .
ilr-,r.ri"ip.f --i*piJrr..".rt
vri-thia a ta:< increm.it -,listri"i "i-p,luiic rmprovement (assessment,)franeworii. The Citv of Chanhass"r, io"u-ru.Iize the ..rr.i:.ty ofthe probtcm resardiig ttris ex is ei"g-iil i""ge way and its respon_sibility r.o iniriarc -improvcm-ncil' i- f""X "forrlrA--to-;;=;;;g
:l:::,,J?::'.hed r-risrricr sraff t""ira. "-ri"ii-="ii.iI"'ii^ii,:.=
lJil: bt
L,\J / r:i ll...JO r L:t
I
o
Riley- Purgatory Creek Watershed District
89sO COUNTY FIOAO *4
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344
July 7, 19 81 .fI:,^"
or rror,liflro
ctry
Mr. Bill Monk
City of Chanhassen
690 Coulter Drive
Chanhassen, Minneso ta 553t7
Re: CPT DevelopmenE: Chanhassen
Dear IIr. Monk:
The engineering advisors to the Board of Managers of
Creek \.latershed District has reviewed the preliminary plansDistrict for the CPT Development in Chanhassen. Based uponto date regarding this project, the following policies andllatershed DisErict are applicable to Ehis projecE.
the Rlley-Purgarory
submitted to the
information known
crlteria of the
ultimately
the Districr
1.
2.
3.
In accordance with Section E(2) of Ehe Districtts Revlsed Rules andRegulations, a grading and land alteration permit r,rill be requiredfrom the l.Iatershed DisEric! for this projeet. Accompanying thispernit application, a detalled erosion control plan for Ehe entiresiEe outlining how sediment will be controlled both durlng and afterconstruction nust be submiEted to the District for revlew and approval .
A Eradlng plan shor.ring bofh existj.ng and proposed contours musr besubmitted Eo Ehe Dlstrict for review and appioval.
A detailed storm sewer plan outlining ho!, s lorrnr.ra ter w111be handled from the development sj-te musE be submitted tofor review and approval.
The DisErlct is extremely concerned with the ultinate trandling ofstormwater in the drainageway located in part on the west sidc of thesi.tc. Severe erosion i-s occurring in this drainageway resulting insedinentaEion rcaching Rice }hrsh Lake located downstream of the CpTpropcrty, The detailed siorm sewer plans rcquired to be subrnltted,as notcd in paragraph 3 above. must include detailed pLans shotring
how stormwarer runoff in Ehis drainageway will ultimately be lrandled
t h rouglr ttre CPT property.
Likclise, tllc District is also concernc<I wiEh che potential of anerosion problem occurring from the outflor,r dlscharge from the proposed
I ;. Bil1 |Ionk
I'age 2
JuIy 7, l98I
RCo/ul
c: AII I'Ianagers
Mr. Frederick RichardsMr, Tlur Keene
Mr. Jlm Engler
S lncerely ,
Ro rt Obermeyer
B ENGINEERING CO.
Engineers for the Dis tric t
sedimentation basin l.cated southeast of the phase I project. prans andcalculations "l:"i:S rha.r.an. erosion problem wlll not oclur because of theoutflow dlseharge frorn this basin must be lncl-uded ," p".a-.i-ate sitersoverall stormwater plan to be subnitted for revlew ""a.rpf.or.f. Thesedimentation basin must provide sufficient detention t1tre for maEeriar.wirh a parrrcle-size of 0,1 nuo and greater ".;;iil-i; "il#Ii.. .r"o*from a l0-year frequency storm to ,Iaii" o,ra.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on thls development at an earlydate. If you have any questj.ons, ple""" call us at 920_0655.
Bob Waibel
Land Use Coordinator
Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Dear Bob:
L,ttrsox & Iltntz
ATTORNEYS AT LA\^/
r9oo rr.lsi BANx PLACi wE Sr
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
June 8, 19 81
Re: CPT
Very truly you rs,
.U55ELI H L^EI3OX
cr^rc r. .Enra
xaevEY a. s(^^F
M^Fx C. xcCUttou6H
1612, !t3-936t
This is to confirm our telephone conversation of June 5, 19gr. Thisoffice would have no objection to the concept of submitiinq the c?Titem to the council for preliminarv developirent pran-'"fpi"i"r u"afinal deveropment plan approvar- on the sami 1ighl. tr'r!'-p"uii" hearingnotice for the planning commission's public h;;;i;g =iiJ,_rii-i'ei".tuthat both rhe preliminary and the finir aeveropmeni pi""-riir u.revierved.. The city couniil'|s minutes should inaicat! thu.l-trr"y .r"
legommen$i1g borh preliminary plan approval and -tinaf tiin approva.l-.substantiatty, all of the itemi desciitea in secrion fi.oitil fulshould be submitted to. the planning commi-ssion witn trre paci<et forJune 17, 1981_. There is =o*e prec6dent for allowing i aE.,r"fopu, toproceed on the fast-track building system. If the 6ity Co;nci1specifically consents to this in i mLtion . approving th; final deveropmentplan, it wourd nor be-necessary to have tinii engii"uri"g-ai.* ing =on file at the time of the public hearing or at ihe time of City Councilapproval. The developer, ar minimum, shouid be willinj t" iifu "site p,at, architectuial, elevation d.rarving, and basi6 ffooi- pfan.
The-proposed procedure whereby prerirninary approvar and final approvalwould be combined into one proceeding is iigiriy ,"r..rii. --i-.* reJ.yingon your assurance that the supporting materiali being provided by clt-are very complete and wett developed.
2"- )il
CRAIG M.IvlE RT Z
Chanhassen Ci ty -\ttornevAssistant
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
RECEIVED
JUil 919Bl
COMI,IUN ITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
Cl,Lu : ne r
(
L-lrrrtrs, IIor.r.rr-l-.,.', 1).r r-t' tx I-rxlt<;rrur-, l,r.r-r.
I5OO NOEITHWESlERN FINANCIAL CENTEGI
79OO XERXES AVE'TUE SOU-rH
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 5 si43I
TE LEFHON E l6tat 635-3AOO
4f 24 rOS CaNTER
(rNNEAPOtrS. MTNNaSOT^ 554O?
TELEFHON€ I6IE J AJ5.3SOO
}IEMORANDUI"l
TO: CITY OF CHANHASSEN
IRoll: DAVID C
LARKIN ,
DATE: JUNE 19, 1981
SELLERGREN
HOFE}IAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LId.
SIEJECT: CPT CoRPORATIoN DEVELOPIIENT
14.05, 3(2) oF oRDTNANCE 47
INFOfu\IATION TO COMPLY I.II TH SECTIONS
a) cPT corporationrs interest in the property at the berow-ref erenced location isthat of or,rn er under an executed purchase agreement dated l,lay 11, 19g1.
b) CPT Corporation is a locatly based, publicly held corporation engaged in rhebusiness of the research, design and manufacture of worrl processing equipment.
CPTrs corporate headquarters are located in Eden prairie, llinnesota, and its
manufacEuring facilities are locaEed at a flumber of sites EhroughouE themetropolitan area, In 10 years CPT has grown a! a rate better than 50ij com-pounded annuaL1y. This growth has occurred through sares i-n the united states
and international markets. This rapid gro,!,/Eh now requires expansion of t.he
Eden Prairie home office and the bullding of a manufacturing facility in
Chanhassen to consolidate its rnanufacturing operations,
CPT Corporation proposes a light assernbly-manufacturing plant on a 69.3 acreparcel souEh of Highway 5 on the far east side of Chanhassen. The nev manu-faciuring facilities consist of approximately 150,000 square feet of space,
852 ot which will be nanufacturing and 15ij r.rill be office. The facility isinlEially planned to employ 330 people on iEs first shifE (7:30 a.m. ro 4:00 p.n.)
and approximately 50 people on iEs second shift (4:00 p.m. to 12:30 a.m,). This
f i-rst phase of development is projected to accommodate the manufacturing needsof CPT riorporation at this site through 1985. Due to the unpredict.rblc rspidgrolrth of CPT and this induslry, hor.rever, fuEure expansion plans for thisfacility are difficult Eo accurrEcly predicc. The building is proposed to be
locaEed on the site so that thc facility can be expandcd to the easE, away from
the cxisting resid(rntial arca. Parl(ing arcas arc in compliance wiEh ordinlnce
requircments and arc locatcd so ils to be shieldcd from Chanhassen EsteEes end
llighuay 5 by exlsting naEural fearures, berns, J-andscaping and the building.
ror coNNEcrlcuT AvENUE, N. w,
w/rsHrNGroN, o. c. 2003 6
1202r?a3-9396
ATTORNEY5 AI LA\l\]
(
Lrrrrirx. lIor.r.rr,rx. D,rr.r. & Lrxrr<;rtr:-..-. I;rn
Ci ty of Chanhassenllemorandum to
June 19, 1981
Page 2
The adjacent land uses consist of the residentlal area of chanhassen EstatesEo the west, dolrntor.rn to the norEheast, Lyman Lumber to the north, and agri_cultural land Eo the east and south. The site is the location previously
ProPosed for a MTS Systems Corporation facility that was under consideraEj.on forconstruction in 1978. rn anticipation of this development, the siEe vas servedwith public utilities and street and intersectLon system, These public servicesinclude a 12-inch lrater main, sanitary se\ner service, approximately l,2OO feetof 28-foot wide frontage road, widening of Dakota Avenul- and upgraiini of theintersection of Dakota Avenue and Hlghway 5.
The proposed stlucture will be located on the site to preserve the existingvegetation and tree cover' the creek bank and bed to the southwest, and romi.ninize Ehe amount of land alteration so as to conform to natural features.The proposed grading plan balances r.he cut and fill quanriEles on the site. Theproposed vater drainage plan is designed so that. the run-off to the ravine tothe sourh\rrest does noE exceed historical frows, and a run-off to the east andsouth of the site does not exceed the historical rate. A11 run-off from lmper-vious surfaces is directed away from the ravine to a holding pond in Ehe eastr'rith skimmer devices in the outlet structure. The drainage pian will conformto the requirements of the Riley-purgatory watershed Dlst;ict and will have robe approved by the DistricE prior Eo Ehe construction on the site.
The bui.lding proposed would consist of 150,000 square feet of floor area, Itis set back approximatley 275 feet from the wesc property line and approximately350 feet from the south property line. The nearest residential struciure wouldbe located approximarely 400 feet from the building, approximately g00 feet fronthe parliing area and appxoxi,ately 600 feet fron the roading area. The firstfloor elevatlon will be at 936 feeE, the roof at 956 feet, ind the base of rheloadi.ng area at 932 feet, The facility r.riI1 be well screened from lhe residen-tial area to the \.,est aod existing natural vegetation on the L,esE side of theproperty and the construction of berms to the 942 and 94g foot elevation. Theseberms uil1 be landscaped r.'lth substantral coniferous prantings functioning asyear-round screening.
The landscaplng plan proposes to leave ![re existing vegetative cover on the r./estside of the property unaltered. This cover consists of both deciduous and coni-ferous plantings in a variety of sizes and vegetive types. The landscaping planproposes substantlal plantlngs around the perimeter of the site including bochsi.des of the frontage road to the north and the north side of the parliing area.The front area of the bulldlng is proposed to be planted rvith prcirie grasscs.
Tire building itself r.r1-11 bc consEructcd of pre-cast, pre-srressed wal.1 panel lraving
main tcnancc-f ree exterior finish and beige in Eone. The building wilt contain ucafeEeria arca for employees Eo riinimize personncl novenenEs on and off lhe sitcin thc course of a business dav.
i
Lr.rrr<rx, IIol.l.rr,r.x, D_nr r_r- & I_tr.tt<;rrr.:x. T_r,o
Ilemorandurn to Clty of Chanhassen
Junc 19, 1981
Page 3
Traffic movements in and around the subject site have been the subject of anumber of studies since 1978. rn 1978 BRli prepared a traffic access plan forthe area south of Hlghr.ray 5, east of counry Road 17 and west of the city limits.This report included Ehis site r^rith the proposed MTS Corporation facility rhatwas to employ 480 persons ln its initial phase. This site was also the subjectof a feasi.bll1ty study for sewer, water, and fronEage roads prepared by schoell
and Madsen, Inc., ln 1978. Based on the information contained in the 1979studles and findings by the llinnesota DepartrDent of Transportation at theintersection of Dakota Avenue and trunk Highr.Tay 5, the state Highlray Departmenthas widened and provided Eurn lanes at the Dakota-TH 5 intersection. rn 1979the clty \.ridened Dakota Avenue to provide road.way adequate for two northboundlanes i.n anticipation of heavy right turn movement from northbound Dakota
Avenue to eastbound rH 5. At the same rime, the frontage road. to the site wasconstructed. CPT Corporati.oD requested Westwood planning and Engineering(liest\rood) to review these studies in light of the current road iystem anddefinitive projecEions of traffic flows based on specific construction plansfor Ehis site. This report and its findings, dared June 16, I9g1, are includedin the present applicaEion. The westwood study concludes that the developnentcan be accommodated wi-Ehout undue de1ay, congesEi.on, or hazard.
c) No sile development ordinance modlfications are requested. Due to CPT Corporationrspressing need to move into a ner,r facility, the applicati.on is being processed asconcurrent approval of the preliuinary and final development p.l-ans. city staff
and the Assistance City At.torney have approved this process.
d) CPT Corporation intends to begin constructj.on of Ehe facility as soon asrequired approvals are received and occupy the facility on or before February l,1982. Future exPansion of this facility is anEicipated, buE the proposed facilityis designed to serve current estimates of spaee needs aE this site through 19g5.
The future expansion of this facility would be on the east side of the currentproposal, with posslble expansion of office and research space to Ehe north.
The city staff has made it clear that any future expansion on this site would
be predicated on the provision of the necessary pubJ-ic facilities,
I
CPT
North
tlPhase I
E leva tion
IIIII IIIII
a
tfi
t-IaE
a
. ..r.r,t :i-.s\
u
I II
I
tl tt
l€i-i
I *€:.ffiT
{
!'r!
t
\\\\
June 16, I98I
Mr. David Sellergrin
!:l!il, Hoffman, Daly & LindgrenI500 Northryeslern Financial denter7900 Xerxes Avenue Sou thMinneapolis, MN 554j1
Subject: TraFfic Impact
CpT Site
Chanhassen, MN
Dear Mr. SelJ,ergrin:
AnaIysi.s
CPT Corpora tion proposes to eonstruct a I5O, OOO square f ootindustri-ar' buirding on a parcel south of rrr"r-riidi,""v i"iJ""t"abetveen Dakota Avenue and lg4th nrunr"- in the Ci ty oF Chanhassen.This in i LiaL con s truction_ an ti cifrt"" -;:O day shiflt emp.Loveesprus the possibiliry of 50 seconb-"r,iri ;r;r;y;;;. " in"ill""n"tfron taqe coad ryill provide """uu= I;-t;" major highvay systemvie Dako ta Avenue and Trunk H^igfr,raf -S and, in the Future, IB4ihAv enu e and T runk HighUay 5. D;koa: nrJnuu viLl also provideaccess to the north via a connection io trunt -iiehr"v'i0iI
rnuci ty of Eden prairie
^has propo""J-""ru iure connection to thes o u i h e a s t . 9 e n e r a I I y .fo1Io;in; . iin"'irom tne Ig4th Avenue inter_sec tion ryith Trunk Hie!y9y S
-ana connecting to-ie"."pii..i"", tVState-Aid Hishvay l. .Thi; "o;;;"ti;;-ias not been designed andrs not p rogrammed in the Forseeable f ulure
?:.I t n the spring -and summer oF 197g, a traffic acce ss plan vasp repa r ed on b ehal f of the ci ty to "" irra te - tn" - t ".Fri. iii""a ",development in the area south or rrunr. 'iignr;y i'F""r'cirlly ,ign_uay I7 to the east city limits. inal study anticipated up to 1700employees on rhe sire in quesrion "nJ J*,"i;";i;;;ti;;,-lo.merci"l.,and industrial developl?l!. "" p"opo""o-ro"- tn"-"iiv:-'i: :. resurr:l_.!!:-,-"t:dy, a Feasibiriry "i;;;-;;; consrrucrioi-or iuiiciprrserv:.ces uas undertaken by-the_ city. In addition, tt" Iii""""._tion oi Dakota Avenue ano'rrunt-Hi6nr"v 5 uas signarized and chan-ne Iiz ed to accommoda te anticipatea -tra'f
f ic movements.
Your charqe to ty'estrvood planning-& Engineering !/as to revie, theda ta b ase trom these s tudies in -riqh['or .,u iu"""ni-"oIi-=y"t",and more deFinitive projections of -i""ifi"
f lours based on speci Ficconstruction plans For Ihis site.
The specific question to be add res sed inuorves a po r tion of DakotsAvenue b e tveen the in te rsec tion o F
-cFT is Froni"s"-r""i-;ni'tr,uiniersection ryith Trunk Hj.ghu"V i.'iii" road section presently
,ar5 w^ytar^ aou(€vlso, Mlr.n€Apolti ,,in€sor^ !5a2a (!ra 5.6atlt
t.
WESTWOOD pr-ANN|NG & ENGTNEERTNG COMPANY
June
Page
David SeJ. Iergrin15, 1981.,
serves as the only
Ch anh as sen Estates
ade .qu3te capacitytreffie generated
aeces s to approximately 1lO home s inare a and CPT Corporation is concernedis p rovided for resi den ti a1 Lra F Fic asby the industrial development.
the
that
ue 11 as
TRIP GENERATION
E s tima tes of trips generated From the chanhassen Es ta les areaindicate a morning peak hour movement or "pp"oii."IJiv-iri'vehiclesvi th approximately trvo thirds outbound and' one third-iniJuno.Approximately 140 vehicles- are expected during tfre evenine peakhour vith approximatery 65% inbound and i5it o,]to"rnJ.-"ii-,Jse "sti_ma tes are calculated from the Ins ti tu te or rransporiation-Eng:.n"ersTrip Generation l"tanual (Second Edition _ t979). 'T;;;;-;;timates
ecmpate favorably to traffic count information g a t f, e r
"
a
-
i n
- f: Z Zin conjunction uilh the trafFic gignaI ryarrant study conducted byIlnT'D0T and have been increa"ua "iiiniry to refleet a ,,uorst ease,,conciition assuming full developrenI on' each residen ti a] Iot inchanhassen Estates. Distribution of this trafFi" "no"" In"t "pp.o*-inateLv 50!,6 of the trips are oriented to ahd f.;; ah;-;"Ji-on rrunr<Highuay 5; z5;r, to and from the norrh on Dakota nr"nu";'Iii zs:; toand From the vest on Trunk Highr:ray 5.
F
h
d
ot
d
D
i
o
I
U
i
a
-ri
alc
iom
ish
')a
nal
nates.of trip generation f rom !he CpT de ve I opmen t vere alsoul-ateci using the ITE Irip Generation I'tanual.' T o t a i -
O
"
i i i
- i
"
, p "a light industriar deveropment such as Lhis are srionii,er Lhan ior ihe average industrial auve.l.opmuni. - C"ilriri"oy traif ic movemen ts bised on I50,000 ".F.'"r" "utir"t"a-io- o"vehicLes per day. Us j.ng the estimateci day "nt ii -"rpi"Vr."t
)0, the average daily tiip generation is irO6O. p";k;;;;-geneiation is based_ on the higher Figuce ior a ,,vorst ;;;",,ysi:.. Day shiFt employment is -expectJd to produce iaO ,"i,i"f ""nS !l-'u morning rush hour ryith g 5,",! inbound and 1596 "ri;";;;:ng the "y9?i.,g rush hour 255 vehicles are expected uj.th approx-eJ'y tvo thi rcs ou tbound and one thi rd inbound. A secono -![i r t0 empl oy ee s ui.II add approx ima te 1y 40 lrips au ring - lhe "uJninqhour uith BSri inbound and 159i outbound. Artrrouf i ii,"""-i"ip"lIy.occur just pr j.or to the normal rush hour, t h;, n"r"-U"..uded in the p.m. peak hour computaiions for i,,uorst """u;ysr.s.
uil
mati5
ush
SUA
ncl
na.l.
!;:ll:f"0, tr j. p , 9 e n r: r: t i o n - from the proposect CpT development j.ss11!nEry less Lhon the vo I ume estimates f rom the r.97g traflfic studybecause the earlier s tudy cnLicipatcd much h ighe r initicl employ_ncnL and slightl,v conservative Lrip generstl.ori Factors based on an
(
llr. David Sell.ergrin
June 16, 198I
Page )
unknoun land use development. tJith the Iouer employment Droject_ions, the. morning traiFic flov on oar.ot"-nr"nr; i;-a;;i;"Ilo to u"app rox ima te l y 1r5 vehi-cres per hou ! less than th;-";i";;; us eo inpreparing the in te rsec t ion design. Hovever, b ecau se oi t""rri"grouth. on Trunk Highvay 5 and ,ie north Ieg'of Oafoia-nvenue, tneoveral l intersection voLume in 19g2 is estimated L; ;" ; i;; ",than the voLume shoun j,n the I97g report.
Based on zone to zone movements from the L97g report, CpT traFFicis estimated to be distributed uith 4796 to and fio, if," """t onTrunk Highr:r ay 5 i 596 ro and f rom chanhassen Estate s; 25?i, to they::t 91 Trunk Highvay 5; and ZJ% lo the north on Dakota Avenue.This distribution indicates tnat ru tu re ex t ens ion or tnu rrontrgeroad to a connection vith rg4th Avenue virl re,love-a sro"lintia:.amount. of traific From the Dakota nvenuerzirunr. iignrry-!"int"r"""-tion. The city has indicated plans to upgrade the lgath Avenue/Trunk Highvay 5 intersection in conjuncti6n vith otn"" -Jur"lopment
:l.i i" uilling to cooperate trith thi deve1op"" in "ii"n"i". "fthe ficntage road iF additional develofments ryarrani if.r"-"o=t ,fcon s truc ti on. rf tra ffic movements at rhe i n t e r s
"
c I i o n
-
o i '
r * n tHighvav 5 and lB4th Avenue can be ""iury maae tnrouln-coJper"eir"ccnst'ruction by rLin/D0T and the city of appropriate channerization
1::_il!?i".ction improvements, thi; easterly' """""r-lo' fnu-Cplsr.:e urJ.1 gieat.Iy enhance yt:..]i.tV of bhis parcel and, as a sidebenefit, vi11 provide an addi.!ionar access path to and FrornChanhassen Estates.
CONFLICT ANALYSIS
Intersection capaci ly analysis is bas ed on competition for use ofthe. common 3!9? Oy vehi cl ei from ea"i,-"pproach leg. During thepeak hour, i60o seconds are altocated b;[;;;; "".Fii"ii"e"*or"_ments_ through drlver
"pu | !""yf s top and yield si9ns, -o" 'ir"ffi"
siqnals. Thc Transoortation 4""""'."n'goard ci rcJ ra i on i,iqt,r"ycapacity (No. 2r2, January ]eBoi ;ii;u;-fl;; ;;'i"^iio6",!ii"r""per hour to comoete fo! tire common intersection area. A more com-fortable des i 91 qoa 1 of t2oo coniiiltiiq ,ou"ren ts per hour iscornmonJ.y used For intersection analysi"
The aLtached d rauinq s depict the es tima t ed l9B 2 trafflic movemen Lsthrough the interse6tion" of D:ko i; -A;;"ru
ui th Trunk Hi.qhuoy 5and t.'e CPT Froncroe road. during tf,o ro.ning-".a "r""l.O'rr""U houis.l:.:- ,:rL durrng lrie morning rush hour Chonh3ssen Estates tralf j.c:.s piedominan tIy ou tbound and counter_tlou to the "" I ir" t.j Cpf
(
llr. David
June 15,
Page lr
Sellergrin
1981
inbound movemen t. Du ring the evening rush hour,are, again, predominantly -in op pos i tJ alrect:.oni,the eompetition for use of Dakot a Avenue.
tra Ftic rnovementsthus reducing
Installation of the traffic signal at Dako ta Avenue and TrunkHighvay 5 vas uarranred becaus6 oi tn"- heavy movement betueenTrunk Highuay 5 and Dakota Avenue to ana From the north. A cri_tical movement analysis for the interJection inJic;a;; ihatsignaJ. time for Dakota Avenue ,irr coniinue to be based on northleg vorumes even rvi th the additio" .i"cpr tr"iric on-ir.','"-"o,tr,I eg. Additional signaJ. time uill be requirea, hovever, duringthe morning rush hour For 1e Ft- iurning - venicr. es From ues tboundIrunk Highvay 5 to southbound O"t oL" 'ir"nr".
The es t ima ted confticti.ng movements during the morning ru sh hourare 845 eastbound vehiclJs; 25 left_turnirig ,"ni"i""; =""i-Lovehicles from Dakota Avenue for a totai o? giO a;;iii"i;-p;,hour. This conilict -ui11 increase to -i fOO ,
"
n i c i e
"
-
p J
"
-
n L- "after construction oF CpT and, tfrereioie, the vo.Lume to capacityrati-o (v/c) virr increase f ron '77?6 to 9r9,i . This i= "liii-lril.,inthe desirable range of I200 conFtj.cis per hour.
Sinilar ca.l.eulations. For the evening rush hour shov eoniLictsoi 885 vehicles per hour prior to c FT
-
cons truc tion anJ sii- arter,
:::"1^::"i", is ue11 belou the desirabie leveI ofl I200 conf.LictsPL! rruul,
The intersecLion of Dakota Avenue vi th the CpT fron t age roadsho,s a cri'ticar. movement of 295 vehicres during tne rio.ning rrsnhou r and 175 vehicles.during the evening rush hour vhich repre_sents a v/c of 259i, and 15!,i iespectivelf.
anr.1t.!c\rTC
Based on inf,ormal-ion eontained in the 197g studj.es and Findings byllnlD0T at the intersection oF Dakota AJenre and Trunk Highvay 5,the state. highr:ray vas uidenec "na prouio"d vith turn lanes and::p::"t? turn phases ar the rrafiie sisnal. The "ily-JliJ."ouakot.a Avenue to orovide a roadvay vidIlr adequate floi iro-nortn_boun d Ianes in anticipation oi ; -i";;;'ri
gh t _ tu rn movement f romnorihbound Dakota Avenue to eastbound Trurik Hjghvay; S. -f substan_tial portion of L.he costs for ir,"=" irp"ovements uere assesscd LoLhe inCu:trla.L zone properties so that these inprovemen,.s coufdbe cornplctcd prior io generation oF traiflic From thc.sc. sites.Bec cuse oi the se imp rovcmen ts, the addj. LionaL trrific anLicipated
(
i;; "Page
J.:-J.(,,/,glltI
I98II5,
5
by development of CpT,s..1j0r000 s.f . indusLrial plan t, can beaccommoda t ed uithout undue der ay, congestion, or' trazaiol- 'Hor"r"",
_cPT should uork closerv ui th inl'ciiv'.r *.,ainas=en-in-iuretopr"ntof the lB4th Avenue intersecLion ,ii( irunk Highr:ray 5 and uithI'ln/D0T to provide safety reatur""-on Trunt< Highr:ray 5 so Lhat accesscan be extended to lhat intersection "" tni" industrial si te ex_pands in the future.
Sincerely,
IIESTI.JOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING CO14PANY
%.^*#/{)- d.J+-
Kenneth ty'. Anderson.
Vi ce President
Ki/A: dg
P.E.
:-
325/BaO
a7 5/325
P M. PEAK
A M PEAK
!VITHOUT
C P T TRAFFIC
3O/5 ia
40/ 55
305/840
o/o
o/o
AJO SCALE
T.H. 5
945/380
(,
o
e,
trJ2-\(o
ll,<.oF
Y
o
()(,
(l
t)
r.t
()
lo
N
o
ro
\
375/945
r.1
o
o
oo
o/o------>
o!1
|nt:
o
o
o
oF
30/50
840/ 30 5.--_..--_i->5/15 \\
lJ)
a!
ut(t
FIVE PHASE SIGNAL
335/925
3ols J
840/ 3 05
65/45
NO SCAIE
40./55
_ 305/840+-480/995
oo
T.H. 5
955/460
40,/ 170
5/ 10 45/ 1AO
o
oro
to
U)
o
@
o(,
l,
oo(t.
o(o(t
o
L,)
(\l
o(l
lo
a)
Lt.l
-o
=;5o
o
|o
ql
u:
ot
(,
935/355
PgAK q)
(1
rn
ro
ro
WITH
CPT TRAFFIC
- +;l#Jt?"itt'"PEaK HouR
-
3 6i,."or ro lnx */#r
ar
R aF Frc
GaNERATtoN racrons.',
o
|{)
@
235/ 125 ____+
o
o)
o
PM F€AK
Aro\/ cpr
June I7, 1981
Armstrong, Torseth, Skold and Rydeen, Inc.
Arch i tects and Engineers
490,l 0lson Memorial H i ghvray
lli nneapol is, I'linnesota 55422
Re: CPT - Chanhassen Manufacturing Plant
Attn: Li nda Bank
Gent l emen:
Enclosed are tentative road cross section and parking area details for yourreview, They are "tentative" at this stage betause we do not have sufficient soi'l sinformation to determine final des.ign.
The roadrvays, inciudin
truck l oadi ng dock are
area rviII be designed
heavy truck tra ffi c .
equival ents suffi ci ent
Lccation
At Inl et Pipes
(Tabul ations arein cubi c feet per
second )
At Grati ng
(Tabul at ions arein cubic feet per
second)
At 0utlet ( Cumul ati ve )(Tabulations arein cubic feet per
s econd )
stha an
usin
The
to
e entrance road, the west 28, of the park.ing area, thed the east-rvest road north of the employee iarkingg granular equivalent sufficient to support lorv vol ur:leremaining parking areas will be des.igned using granular
support low volume light truck and passenger iai traffic.
Fo1lor'ring is a tabulation of runoff flows calculated for each catch basin:
B
B
B
o
i1
B
B
B
C.
C.
c.
C.
C.
c.
c.
c.
#t
-Jq
"!6
#7
ro
.68
on
.17
?(
cA
2.39 *
) .rE *
6.57 *
1.40
on
o.+/
?E
9.36
lt.7s
2.25
20.57
*Side inlets may be required in final design.
The above calculations r,rere based on the formula Q-AiR with apportionment ofsurfaced areas versus turf areas to determine ,'R". A 2', per hour value of"i" vras used. Final design calculat.ions will employ the i,unit hydrograph
engtneeting -.tandscaDo archttectutc phone 6lZ_SJ6-4303 _ 1,115 north lilac drivo, minneaDotis, mn 55.i22ptanntng - utban toseatch phone 2a6-823-g339 - 9756 n e. tlzoii-[ta-ce
"liri'ino,
wa. glols
WEHF I',4AN
CONS U LTANTS
ASS O CIATED
tNc.
b. ketlh wehtman
roy a- andeGod
iohn o. beryly
tichatd d. lredtund
chatles a. wittenbery
6.72 (Roof Drain)
8. 30
8. 82
9. 36
I 4.00
Arrns tron,
Page Tr.ro
June 17,
Torseth, Skold and Rydeen, Inc.
l98t
method" for determining runoff volumes and rates for both the storm sewersystem and the retention pond:--T!9 storage capacity ror tr.',e-reienfion ponashor'rn, satifies the need for. r20,000 - I30,o0o'cuuii: reet-oi ii...i.l" t.method used in carcurating the needed capaiity vras a graphic solution usingthe Yrjanainen and r,larren-method,',simprL Meiirod for n.tlntion-giiii"oesrgn,,(see "t,tater and Se*er works,,- o.ce*U"i igigi.' Wnun,;ii;;;; b;;;;.;available, as noted above, the ,,unit hydrogiiph method', v,,lii Uu-riea.-
we did not relocate the retention pond because in our opin.ion to do so wouldnot be cost effective. The grading required to construct the pond .isrelatively minor in quantity-and t5 move the pond to ilre souirrLiri iorn..of the property would require either construciion or additionar iio., ,.r."or. continuous erosion problems. .In additon, we have ."-riiirl-ir-iiicutatingeither the ultimate need for additiona.l pond.inq or tfre timing ot j.u.iopr.ntof a major storm setver system for the arLa.- ''
If you have questions regarding the above, please cal.l us.
Si ncere 1y,
I.JEH RI,NC SULTANTS AS CIATED, INC.
B. Keith llehrman
B r,,.r,r/ s k
I
't
---::=1
\_\\
-
\I
F
J
\_
\AS
::
\\
lr
=\
F-
N.$
.(\(\
N\
\
\\
I
s'\
i:,
,:
"':
\JJ'i..; ,r
l:"i
l':' i .,-,,:, ll
':,
j).us
i\
:,
\l
{i
G
=
e
=\
:l't5
l-.-.('
o
-l|l:'
it;\
\
F
N
it
\!
I\
s-
i
J-
'.,:
I
)
1
t
,
1
l
:
:
)j
f
tiIrl;
{
1
-l
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
tc\'-:'.
\
s\ris,{
,s
\\z\s
{J$
*\
R
?
s
\\
N
\,r
s
$)
Ns
{
s
si
\
T}$*
i$.N:\s
\-\
s
$s
*
$'f" +
$*$s
F\ xS
N$$R
$$ l\
\ t l'I)(SPT{
$
s
?
{\
$
$
K\
7{\
s
$
!\I
\
{\
*<
\
\
al\
ts
'
z\t
Nfi
\
s
$
7
\
\
}
s
s -l)
$
)
N
x\
r.-=-'r
) :'i
l:.1
Slr
tr.f\ -i{E.oi\s\ i.
sEl
5
\
n
=\
sF$*
q \(\Ss.r>*{\*
!.\\Nn\
>z\
(Ntr\
sl.-. A \.
' 'ti
I
I
I
I
II
!
. .!),SR il$Z\f..> $5YS=$a \"'i
- u-{ :i - l)-(IPt -lrx'u
F$.st,:sp.r.J ? ;.I)J AlJ o.a - i\- -\a<!.i>sS lzilo.sr iJi\_r 9l . S\\ c\ _: r ls Eir Pr-( sEuS sssx
z.
, li
I
,i
,l
Ir'
\'
:-
rl
u^
Jtme 29, 19 87
I4r. Bob WdbeL, City Plotner
Ci.fu of Chorhassen
690 Cculter D?ioe
P. 0. Boo 147
Atozhassen, MN 55317
,./-zzl,.r,. -,:",,1 i i' 1 l,;,WiLLian C. I{alZbeig ./I4dtager o f Engineering
Gas Operations Di.tsist)an
700 LtnCcn Aue, ll.
t?tnneapoli.s, l.lll 55403
EncLoswc
ilCl: bc
rYf,innegasco
I\l inncsota Gas Contl>any
733 rnarquirtle avonuc. mrnnoa!olrs rnrnresota 5:,:-2
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
DF/^FI\/FT-)
ri,l. 2 1981
c0MMi,iNlT'J DIf LLiJI'lilNT DtPT'
Re: P.topoeed site plot: Phase 1ne of CVI ptoperty(I.H. 5 east of Dokota Aoenuz ) -
Dear i4!. WcLbeL:
This is to adttLse gou that Minnegasco ha a gas nai.n on the north sideof T.H. 5 fron uhich ue c@t ae?ue this ptoposed detselopnent. An aZtermatesou?ce, but possibly note costly to insiall, uould be -fnon otu main on
Dd<ota Arenue aouth of f .H. 5. I on retwming yout commmi,ty Loca;,lon
g'?dphi.c uith tltese nai,ne shoun in rcd.
;'f.e requ.e-st .that -A.ou pass tttis infonntia,t along to the qproprLate oez.sonsinuoloed uith this deoelopnent otd adtt[se then to contoci tte ftinniaasco
South l,letno Region sales office, Loeated at lotktotn Centey in EdiitL(TeL: 831-1858). EeLy contoct uiLL aeswe arple ttne to noke necessdr\!
az,raxgements to se"te the p?operty.
Thotk gou foz, yout, consideration and notificatiort.
Iours tmtly,
Don ]lc,h, c,tur
(
s7)(r
5CITY OF
CHINHISSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE . P.O. BOX 147 ' CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 9s7- 1900
TO:
PLANNING REPORT
FROM:
Don Ashworth, City Manager
Bob WaibeL, City Planner
July 15, 198LDATE :
/r
SUBJ: Site Plan Revj-ew for Proposed Instant Web Eacilities in
Paxk Two, and Preljminary Development plan Review for a
Proposed Block 3 or Park Two
APPLICANT: Instant Web, Inc.
PLANNII.IG CASE: 81-1 Site Plan
This memorandum is written in hopes of avoiding any unnecessary
confusion regarding the action at hand. As you know, due tothe critical nature of the proposed Instant web Facility tothe timing of the Downtown Redevelopment Project, staff has
been working with the developer in an attempt to expidite the
review of the overall Park Two proposal with primary emphasls
on the Instant web site plan. Due to problems in tjming of
developer submittals etc., it was recently realized that a
concurrent consideration of a preliminary development plan for
Park Two and a site plan for the proposed Instant web Facility
was not attainable at this time. As a result, it is the con-
census of the Planning Commj.ssion and staff that the only immed-j-ate City Council action available is the consideration of the
rezoning and site plan for that portion of Park Two east of
County Road #I7. As such, the remainder of this planning report
is an extrapolation of the items of concern discussed by the
Planning Commission and staff pertinent to the proposed fnstant
Web site p1an, For further clarity sake, I have underlined
those parts of the Planning Conmission minutes which deal specifi-
ca1ly with the site plan of Instant Web.
The applicants site plan indicates the proposal to subdivide the
parcel east of County Road *17 into two building sites, one for
Instant Web Inc and another commerc ia1/j.ndustria 1 parcel in the
northwest corner of the subject parcel. Both staff and the
Planning Corunission concur that. the feasibility of the develop-
ability of the parcel in the northwest corner is dependent upon
the ultimate location and sizing of a stormwater holding pond
necessary for the Instant Web sj.te. The ultjrate design of said
The
pond could directly affect the accessability to this prospectiveIot, and as such the possibility of creating said lot should notbe considered until the final design of said pond is determined.
The applicant is proposing to construct an approximate 206,000
square foot of fice /manufacturing/warehouse facility on the
subject property. As shown in the attached site plan, the office
area in the southwesterly most portion of the structure is to
be earth sheltered and the preparation, storage, production
areas are to be above grade.
The applicant's architect report dated .-uly 6, 1981 indicatesprovisj-on of parking spaces in excess of the requi.rement of
the zoning ordinance #47. Under the P-3 District Provisions
of ordinance +47, there are no specified setbacks for the location
of parking areas. Due to excessive right-of-ways and slope
easements along Hj-ghway 5, this office finds no Problem with
the location of the parking area along the northerly property
IJ-ne, however, for obverse reasons, f recomnend that a 25'
parking area setback be maintained along County Rd. 17.
Although the roadway along the northerLy edge of the building
is private, this office has suggested that the applicant
should consider adjustment to the PIan that would minimize
the conflict between traffic egressing from the parking stalls
and the through traffic on the roadway. Since the overall
parking lot does exceed the nr:mber of spaces as required by
ordinance #47, perhaps a phased parking plan could be consid-
ered wherein said spaces along the northerly edge of the building
could be limited and or constructed only if absolutely necessary.
The applicant has indicated that these spaces are to serve the
northerly portion of the building which is proPosed to be leased
for an interim period. A11 parking for the subject faciLity shall
be contained within parking areas so designated.
Applicant has been asvised that necessary arrangements maypotentially need to be made with the gas company for the poss-
ible relocation of a trunk gas main traversing the subject
property .
The architectural treatment of the proposed Instant Web building
will consist prinarily of insulated architectural metal panels
which will be white in tone. The applicant has indicated that
since the proposed buildj-ng wiII be considerably lower than
Highway #5, special design has been incorporated that will-
eliminite meciranical roof-top equipment and minimize any adverse
visual impact of the roof itself.
The applicant has submitted a landscape plan, however,-due-to
"rrr"|- problems, the plan has been shifted approximately 15-20r
to th; iest. raking t-tr:- s into account, there witl be no planting
" i""q -th.- Couniy rlgfrt-of-way as indicated j'n the landscape plan'
Instant Web, Inc.
July 15, 1981
Page 2
Instant Web, Inc.,IuIy 15, 198I
Page 3
The applicant hathe visual impac
on the b qm areaadditionally re1
areas which may
srtosb
oca
con
esponded to suggestions by staff to minimizef the loading bays through extensive landscaping
etvreen said loading bays. The applicant willte some of the }arger plantings in the parkingflict with parking security lighting.
The July 8, 1981 report from the applicants architect states thatfull compLiance hrith section 12.07 of ord.inance #47 will be maderegarding standards for noise, vibration, dust, smoke, odor,glare and waste. Additionally, the applicant will be subject tothe statutory requirements of preparing a hazardous and toxicsubstance inventory and analysis which is to be filed with the
County for possible necessary permits and/or licensing for
any such substances.
Since the applicant has requested for a potential commercial
zon j-ng for portions of Park Two and since Chanhassen is presently
considering an ordinance amendment to permit limited commerciaLfacilitj.es south of Highway #5, a P-3 zoning for the subjectproperty has been recommended.Ihe P-3c lass if ication does permit
"industrial uses compl-ying with the standards of the P-4 PlannedIndustrial Development District". The action of approving
rezoning the subject property to P-3 and the site plan forInstant web wiII permit Instant web to construct the facility as
proposed and grant the City Council a subsequent opportunity
to review the land usage for other potential lots in Park Two
when alI appropriate information from the applicant is available.
Recornmendation :
I recorunend that the City Council approve the rezoning of the
subject property from R-lA, Agricultural Residential- District to
P-3, PLanned Community Development District. Additionally, I
recommend that the City Council approve the site PIan for the
proposed Instant Web facility as shown on the Korsunsky, Krank,
Erickson Architects, Inc. site plan Conunission #79-15-01 with the
following conditions -
1, That the applicant prepare and file a hazardous and toxic
substance inventory and analysis in accordance vrith the
requirements of Minnesota State law.
2. ahat the perimeter of all parking and manuevering areas be
constructed with concrete curb.
3 That all exterior tighting fixtures be shielded utiliz i-rtg
high pressure sodium elements.
That the design in the construction of the proposed
Web facility incorporate the recommendations of the
Engineer as found i.n the July 5' 1981 and July 15,
Engineer Memorandums.
Instant
Cj-tY
1981 City
4
CITY OF
EHINHISSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX ,I47
' CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
I{EMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE :
Don Ashworth, City Manager
BilI Monk, City Engineer
July 16 , 1981
Park Two Site Pfan UpdateRE
At this time, the developer is in the process of revisingthe final drainage and grading plans for the site east of
County Road 17. Although I am involved in the design process,
any s j-te plan approval by the City Council shoul-d be contingent
upon final approval of said plans by this office.
CITY OF
EEIANIIISSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE . P.O. BOX I47 ' CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937- 1e00
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ :
The
T\do
f o l1owi-ngsite plan rs a revlewfor Lot 1,,
of theBlock 3
Planning Commission
Bill Monk, City Engineer
July 5, 1981
Park Thro - Site plan for Lot 1, Bl_ock 3
engJ-neert-ng aspects of the park
Streets
1). Entrance drive to Cin width.R. 17 sha1l be constructed 36 feet
2l . Although the roads and parkingsections shalI be submitted for
3) ' The prqposed entrance road sha1lDetails of the access pJ.an forbecause of problems with grade
Iot are private, crossreview.
also serve LoE 2, Block 3.this smaller Lot are reguiredand location of the ponding area.
Sanitary Sewer
A 10" sanitary sewer exists in c.R. 17 and sharr serve this site.
Watermain
A 18" DIP watermain cxists in C.R. 17 and shall serve the site.
Dra ina ge
The appJ-i"cant has subinitted a drainagc plan that wi.ll adequatery handleall surface runoff crossing the site and generated by the site. Itshould be noted that. portions of the blacli top area lre designed toact rs ir temporary water storage area for the 100 year storm; but thisls noL unusual for a warehouse type facility. Approval of the site
:sEE:-]-:
A private roadway system is proposed to serve the site. Theentrance is to Line-up with park Road and the overall pran shouldbe subject to the following conditions:
Park Two
-2-((
plan should have the following conditions
1). Runoff from the front parking areapiped to the ponding area.
2) . Drainage easementsalong the pipes.
3). Required agency approvalsconstruction.
shall be platted for the ponding area and
for drainage:
shall be collected and
shall be secured prior to any
I.i_tlcr-l/'
\\
\
,---J
o
0
LOrUS
I/_
t
t
-9
I+
C,
LA
',]
I
I
\I1l
SUBJECf
I
E.
--_)
_l
1i
lilt--7'
/
2 6o
"oP
LUC Y
-_]
il
I
T-
$
22
KOBSUNSKY KRANK ERICKSON ARCHITECTS, INC
ZON ING ORD I NANCE REVIEW
C ITY OF C HANHASS EN
lnstant Web, lnc.
Conrn. No.79-l5-01
ARCHITECTS . PLANNERS . INTEBIOR OESGN
July 8, 198t
Re
Zon ing
Permitted Uses
Land lJse
P-3 Planned Cornmuni ty Developrent District
lndustrial Uses (Comply with P-4 Standards)
Bui lding Coverage
Parking Coverage
Landscaped Cove rage
195 ,
201 ,
216,
925
050
177
ft.
f t.
f t.
sq
sq
sq
(31.952)
Bz.79z)
05.262)
Open Space
Performance
Standa rds
Landscaping
S i te Dra inage
Setbacks
Req u i red
See submi ttal
613,tsz sq. ft. (looz)
Type ll I Hour
High Pressure Sodium
Sh ie I ded from Glare
Des i gnated along Riley Creek
as part of Subdivision of Park Two
Full compl iance with ordinance section 1r2.07 fornoise, vibration, dust, smoke and odors, glare,
and was tes
See submittal plan by Landscape designer
plan by Civi I Engineer
No mandatory requi rement
l- I used for reference
30r front yard
25t side and rear yard
Total Site Area
Const ruct ion
Light in9
57O GALAXY ElullDltlc 330 SECONO AVENUE SCXJTH MTNNEAPCLTS. MTNNESOTA 55401 (612)339-4200
ZON ING ORD INANCE REVIEW
C ITY OF CHANHASS EN
PAGE T1./O
P rov ided Fron t
Side
r 80 ft,
135 ft. adj .
60 ft. adj.l0 ft. adj,
to bldg. lot
to H ighway 5to rail road
Parking
Req u i red
l.lanu fact ur i ng
0ff i ce
lJarehousing
P rov i ded
AREA
lns tant l,Jeb
355 spaces shoyrn
SIZE INITIAL
30
F I NAL
50
r5
135 (/1350)
75
No mandatory requi rernent-l used for re fe ren ce
space per emp I oyee
space per 200 sq. ft. gross floor area
space per l.! employees on major shift
Sf
Sf
sf
sf
13,209
6,ooo
5,193
109 ,og4
9
56 (1/1950)
30
Sub-Tota I
Leas ab le
0ffice
P rodu ct ion
r4,578 sf (203)
58,31I sf
73 (t/2oo)
58
133 ,496 sf 125 spaces 275 s p aces
S ub-Tot a I 72,889 st I ll spaces
TOTAL 206,385 sf 2!5 spaces 2fJ sgaces
Recommended reduction to 300 spaces.
0ffice
Prep. Dept.
Emp loyees
Production
(0ve r shlft)
L
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION IIEETING
HELD JIJNE 10, 1981, AT 7:30 P.M.
CHANHASSEN CITY HALL
Members Pre sent:Chairman A.
H. Noziska,
M. Thompson,
B. Waibel, C
I PPROVED ON
Partridge, C. Watson, W. Thompson,
and ],. Conrad.
J. Thompson
Mertz , I,1. Koegler and B . Foreman
j"*44
_l
7
Memlcers Absent :
Staff Present:
\
Rezoninq,Subdivision, and Site Plan Review Request, Park TwoPublic Hearing:
Bob l^laibel, Clty Planner, submit.ted his report to the planning
Commission. WaibeL indicated that there is sewer available forthis property and that the Comprehensive plan shows the subjectproperty to be zoned Industrial. Waibel explaj.ned that part ofthe subject property is in the flood plain and the staff isr.raiting to hear cornments from the DNR and Riley Purgatory Creek
Watershed District. Parts of the building will be earth sheltered.
The applicant has not, submitted a Iandscape plan yet. waibel
recommended to the Planning Commission to continue this Publ-icHearing until aIl the applicants informatj-on has been submitted.
Steve Krenz, a representative for Park Two, indicated that he
had received a letter from the Watershed District stating that
t.hc l,latershed Districf is requesting a I00 foot easement, a
50 foot easement had been proposed but the increase is beingconsidered. Krenz indicated that Block I has an unusual contour,2l- foot difference from one side of Block to other, which createsa drainage probl-em. Also applicant is requesting 2 accessesonto #17. One on the Nl: and one on the S!, applicant is askingfor consideration. Krenz stated that as for emissions there is
none -f or Instant Web, they use a non heat set and no dryer forthe ink so there l-s no em1ss1ons.
Wai-beI indicated thaton #I7, #I7 will be aCity Engineer agrees.
staf f
ma in
access
HW 212
feels no
road when
should be granted
gets bui1t. The
Applicant is requesting to have such things as service stations,
cja::den store , restaraunts in this Industrial Park.
Wai);el indicated that some of the businesses from the downtown
arcr still need places to relocate. Some have requested to be
Iocatcd in this Park -
Krenz rcqucsts that Park Two bc zoned t.o include all the requests.
I'iaibel indicated that the ordinance doesn't allow for that flex-
ability. May have to zone lot by lot but doesn't li.ke spot
zoning. Waibel would feel more comfortable zoning by district.t-
(
Planning Commission Minutes
June 10, 19 8I
Craig Mertz, Assistant City Attorney, explained that they can'tintroduce into the zoning district anything that is not j.n theordinance unless they change the ordinance.
Art Partridge asked if the subject property could be zoned p-4
instead of P-3. Wailcel indicated that P-4 would be more restrictive.Canrt grant use variances, the ord.inance would have to be changed.
Mertz indicated
P-3 and C-3.
that it would be possible to have some lots
Jules Smith, a representat.ive for Park One, indj-cated that zoningby district is a good idea but not for this project, to zonethis area as P-3 and then later rezone again is a lot of extra
unnecessary work.
Krenz indicated that there is a t ijrle factor here. Instant W
o eou o u ng yacer a o the ir
new building fol lhe Pqwqtol?]redevelopment jrqject. The same
who want to buy some of the lots becauseof the redevelopment project.they are also moving because
to the
plai-n.
indicated that they may possibly move the proposed road
west and make the front lots vrider because of the flood
I
=t'laibel stated that if '],ot 2 of Block 3 wants a restaraunt then
all of bl-ock 3 could be zoned P-3. Smith stated that r^rould
limit them because service stations are not allowed in a P-3
area.
Darreil Fortier, the archit,ect for Instant Web, indicated that
it is important for Lot 3, Block 2 to have 2 accessess. Its
desirable to have a convienant access for a restaraunt. If
a rescaraunt would be built on this Iot the access wouldnrt be
noticable from the passing traffic because of the 20' slope.
Motion made by W. Thompson and seconded by C. Watson to continue
this public hearing to the 24th of June. All voted in favor
and the motion was carried.
Fortier ex D lained that Instant l^Jeb bui ldin a2 00 0o_o o S uar
fooc buildin and would be able share an access with L oi:o
ees and the offices are disconnectedTheyM1l have 30 0 e mp ovI
from Lhc main bui l={ils The v plan !o burm
plan Lo drain water to the rear with a small holding pond in
and won't glare on other
considerablv and
the front. The J igh!.inq _wi I I be down
goes s
(uses an the area. The outside of the bui.ldinq wi 1I be madefrom aluminum material and will be white in coLor. T o f
wl-be flat,
Conrad asked what the buildinq will look like from the roadsince it is so low witl the eo Ie as s l-n on the road onle roof? Bob cat that the site wil-l- be
bbeaetoseetwell screened and that the use on Lot 2 w a so help in screening
Frank Beddor, the applicant, indicated that the materials bei"nqused on the roof are much more ex ve than what, tLrey catl ldused but what lbey arq qsing s/ilI look nicer. Beddoris interested in setting off his building, concerned with theloos.
Replat Reguests Lots 15 , L6, L7 , 27 , 28 arld 29, Minnewashta
(
Creek 2nd Addition:
Motion was made by H. Noziska and seconded by W. Thompson to
recommend to the City Council to approve the subject xequest r/rith
the condition that the applicant submit the appropriate hardshell
and mylar documents necessary for recording and that the propertyin question be assessed additional trunk sewer and wat.er unit.sas per the north service area publj-c improvement project. AIIvoted in favor and the motion was carried.
Trunk llighway I01 Realignment Concept St,udy Review:
The 5 alternatives for realigrunent of Highway f01 were presentedto the Planning Commission.
Watson indicated that she like alternate #2
Conrad agrees.
but #5 is more workable.
Noziska Iikeif cost is no
I because of the straightness. Partridge like #2object but if cost is the object then #6.
W. Thompson indicated that he like a combination of #2 and #5.
A votc was taken by thc Planning Commission to
nat.j-vcs were best, liked. #f -0, *2-3 (watson,
#3-0, +4-0, #5-2 (w. Thompson and Ii. Noziska).
see which
Partr idge ,
al ter-
Conrad),
Planning Commission Minutes
June I0, 19 81
Page 3
this use.
A motion was made by Conrad seconded by Watson to close thePublic Hearing. All voted in favor and the motion was carried..
I4ark Koegler from SchoeII and Madson stated that the City Councif
wants to know which alternative the Planning Commission prefers.
Planning Commission MinutesJuIy 8, 19 8I
Page 3
Park Tlvo,Final- Development P1an and Site PIan Review:
Steve Krenz, a representative from park Two, stated that ifthis plan went. along wj_th the city's flood plain and WatershedDistricts then the DNR would approve the plan also.
Partridge explained that aII the proposed uses for park Twodo not fall under the p-3 classification, some are 1isted inthe C-3 catagory. Partidge asked if the property could bezoned C-3? Waibel indicated that maybe the planning Commissioncould amend P-3 to allow service stations. But thai may besetting a preced.ent. p-3 al_lows for industrial with some com-mercial uses but service stations arenrt aIlor"red.
Watson asked if the Planning Commission could zone the lots
ind j.vidual Iy with restrictions?
Frank Beddor, the applicant, indicated that at the last meetingit was the concensus of the ptanning
Conmission that the lots fronting County Road #I7 be spotzoned commerci-al and the back lots zoned for industrial.
Beddor also indicated that he would like to Iocate a commondrive between lots 2 & 3, block 1 with a right turn only and a
common drive for lots 1& 2, bfock 2. Lot 2, block 2 will beIand locked if no access is permitted onto #17.
Russ Larson, City Attorney, suggested that the planning Commj-ssionconsider zoning the commercial lots C-2 instead of C-3 becausethe uses are a little'more restrictive. Servi_ce stations arepermitted as a conditional use under C-2.
Partridge asked Larson if spot zoning is acceptable. Larsonstated that the proposed commercial uses seems to be compatablewith the industrial, uses he feels it would be acceptable.
l,laibel indicated to the PJ.anning Commission that the public Hearing
was published in the paper as a rezoning to p-3, which may have tobe republished.
Watson made a motion seconded by Conrad to reco[unend to theCity Council to rezone the entire parcel to P-3, Planned Com-
munit-y Development District, with the exception of Lots L,2,3,
Block I and Lots | & 2, Block 2 and Lot 2, Block 3 which shal1
bc zoned C-2, Commercial District. Ayes - Watson, Partridge,
t,J. Thompson, Conrad, Nays - J. Thompson. Motion was carried.
J. Thompson indicated that he
uses in an i-ndustrial zone.
was concerned about commercial
waibel indicated that he was concerned about the pedestrian pathto Chanhassen Business park and that no access to ttighway #5 or#I7 should be granted, all accesses should be onto pirX ioia.Lots 2, Block I is land locked, wants to minimize U-turns.
Daryl f'ortier, a park Two representative, indicated that theCounty st.ated that they do not like median breaks any closerHighway #5 than 300' .
Partridge asked if the planning Commi.ssion could require noexit signs onto #17. Waibel stated that they would -probabJ-y be violatedand #17 access should be limited.
Planning Commission Minutes,.IuIy 8, 19 81
Page 4
J. Thompson indicatedonly I lot instead of
that maybe Lot I & 2, Block 2 should be2, then it wouldn't be land locked.
Beddor indicated that if the lots couldn,t have an access ontoCounty Road #17 that would create a hardship for the Iots.
J. Thompson suggested that they eljminate entlances totallyfron *I7. LoL 2, Block 2 coul-d be worked out with a cul-delsacthrough Lot L, Fortier indicated that that would take up quitea bit of the 1and.
A motion was made by J. ?hompson seconded byany curb cuts on County Road #17 except forand L. Conrad voted aye, Watson, W. Thompsonnay. Motion failed.
Conrad t.o not a I lowPark Road. J. Thompson
and Partridge voted
A motion was mad.e by J. Thompson, second. by Watson that Block 1be allowed a right. turn only access located betrreen Lots 2 and 3and curb cut shal1 not be locat.ed closer than 300 feet fromthe intersection. A11 voted i.n favor and the motion was carried.
Fortier indi-cated that LolL 2 Bl-ock 3 has on1 approx iJna t e.I
503 of buildinq ar
W. Thompson made a motion, second by Watson that Lot 2, B1ock 3accept the road pattern drawn in on Exhibit A with I curb cutas a right out onto County Road #I7 and to be not closer than300 feet from the intersection of County Road #I7 and Hwy #5.AII voted in favor and the motion was carried.
I{r. Thompson made a motion to return this site plan toitect for further study on tots I ,2,3,and 4 of Block 2votcd in favor and thc motion was carried.
the arch-. AII
Partridge madc a conunent stating that he would like to note
to Lhc City Council that staff was not given adequate time
for .r complete revicw of proposed site plan and further that
thc Pl;lnning Commission recommendations are in opposition with
the staffrs feelings tha! there be no curb cuts onto County
Road #17.
Planning Commission MinutesJuIy 8, 19 81
Fortier indicated that the Instant Web buildinq is no Ionqera two phase pl-an but one. There is a 25 foot qreen space r.nfront of the parking lot, Fortier submitted a letter t o thgPlannfnqeommlssion dated July 8, 1981.
Conrad made a motion seconded by W. Thompson to reco[unend totheCounc i I va1 of the proposed site 1an of Lo !lrdrainage ,Block 3 with review b the Cit1ihrinL andsc a l-n an en eer 1nto cond l t l-ons ral-se dintheP ann
Staff re ard in rki-n
an a sow con s r-era t J-On
nq Report ated June
and JUI 8, 1981 and the Cit Engineer I s Re ort dated JuI 1981.AII vote avor an e mot Lon hras carr e
Hazardous Waste Site Selection Process Update:
Waibel and Partridge informed the Planning Commission of thelatest statis of Chanhassens involvement j.n the search process.
Meeting was adjourned at 12:00 a m
LCITY OF
EEIfiI{IIASSEI{
I4EMORANDUM
690 COULTER DRIVE . P,O. BOX 147 . CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
TO:
FROM:
DATE :
SUBJ :
The HRA and Planning Commission have reviewed. the concept planreport prepared by Schoell and Madson, Inc. for realignmenl ofthe Highway 101./West 78th Street/Dakota Avenue inters6ction, andhave made the folfowing recornmendations :
HRA
The HRA reviewed the report on May 2L, ]-9g!, and reached a concensusof preference for arternative #5, or some variation thereof. The HRAalso fel-t that traffic signage in the area around this intersection shouldbe improved in order to reduce motorist confusion.
Planning Commission
Staff Recommendation
Pranni-ng and engineering staff (see attached) berieve that arternative#5 represents the most ieasible approach to improving trafficconditions in this area. consequently, we rec6mmend having the city'sconsulting engineer prepare a cost eslimate for constructi6n ofalternative #5.
analyze potential minor. signage, lane striping, etc.)little expense in the immediateis found to be prohibitive.
I" !!9 meantime, the City Engineer wilI
modj-f icati-ons to this intersection (i.ewhich could be completed at relativelyfuture if thc cost of major realig.*"-r.rt
Don Ash$rorth, City Manager
Scott A. Martin, Comnunity Development Director
July 6, 19 81
Concept Plans for Realignment of Highway 101/DakotaAvenue Intersection
-The Pranning corunission 'eviewed the report on June 10, 19g1. Three(3) commissioners favored arternative #2 and two (2) favored alternative#5; arthough both of the preferred arternatives need "o*. .odification.
Don Ashworth
-2-
The City Council should review this matter at their next regularmeeting if time permits
Report Attachments
1
2
3
4
T.H. 101 Realigrunent Study dated May, 1981.City Engineerrs Report of June 4, L987.
HRA Minutes of May 21, l-981.
Planning Commission Minutes of June 10, 1981.
SAM: nh
ffiffiffiffiEIA$F83f,
690 COULTER DBIVE. P.O. BOX 147 ' CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
PLANNING REPORT
FROM :
Planning Commission
BiIl Monk, City Engineer
,fune 4, 1981
101 Realignment Study
DATE :
TO
RE
In reviewing the T.H. 10I Realignment Study, I abandoned myorj-ginaI thought of ,'do nothing" in favor of alternate 5 aidetailed in the report. The advantages of thi-s alignment axeIisted on page 11, but consideration of development in the areaand .its impact on traffic generation through ti:is intersectionis also a serious concern. Industrial d.ev6lopment along thefrontage roads north and south of T.H. 5 as well_ as the d.owntownredevelopment is imminent. Traffic on T.H. 10I will increasebecause of all these improvements and the existing intersectionis not capable of handling any increase. Turning and stackingrestrictions at the existing i-ntersection as welr as poor traific
c j-rculation rend.er j_t margi-na1 at best but it will quickly ,deteriorate to an unsafe situation und.er an increased traificl-oad .
Improvements at this Location will be needed within the nearfuture,and alternate 5 provides for acceptable traffic flowwhile being the best of the alternates in terms of cost ef fect.-iveness.
CITY(JF
HRA lvlinute s
Page 2
RusseII, to auththe required Env
orize BRW to prironmental Asse
Authori-ze pre paration of EAW:Niemeyer moved, seconded bvoceed with the preparation'of
ssment Worksheet (EAW) for theat a cost not to exceed gB,00O,ter from BRW dated May I8, I9BLon carried.
:
, Inc.
nue
ept
Downtor.in Redevelopment pro jectas outfined in the proposal 1etAII voted in favor and the moti
Zoninq Ordinance Rev asaons:special meeting to revierd thecommercial and industrial regOrdi-nance since this will_ 1ikHe rccofiunended that commissioto the proposed zoning distriuses in each district when reThe Cor[nissioner's agreed toat 7:30 p.m. in the City Coun
Concept Plans for Highway lol/Dakota Avenue IntersectionMa;I KGETer, pianilfng Consultant for S"ffipresented a realignment study for Hwy. 1OI at Dakota Aveand !^I. 78th Street. Five (5) different alternative concplans were reviewed and discussed by the Conmissioners.A sixth option, that of sieoly imp-roving traffic signagin the vicinity of the intelsectioi.r, wa= also discusied]
The general- concensus was a preferenceor some variation of this plan.for alternative #5
Martin suggested scheduling aproposed revisions to theulations of the City Zoningcly be a time consurning process.
ners pay paxticular attentionct boundaries and permitted
viewj-ng the draft report.
mcet on Thursday, June 4, 198Icil Chambcrs.
Old Busingss: Mike Sorenson appeared before the HRA to requestsome resoiution to his dil"ema of wanting to develop hisproperty along creat pl-ains BLvd. He h;d waited f6r nearlv2 years while the Downtown Redevelopment project was being'planned to see if something could be worked out with theCity relative to the affect of his proposed liquior storedevelopment on City plans to improve Gieat plajns Blvd.
Niemeyer suggested that staff contact the adjoining propertyol.rner to the east and determine if land acquisition iro* tf,itparty could be worked out. Adding more land area to theSorenson Lot would provj-de for adequate building setbacksoff-street parking, and building site for reasonable develop-ment of this property, in conformance with the overallRedevelopment plan of the City. Staff was directed tonegotiate with the property owner and proceed with appraisals,as necessary, fo}j the purchase of a portion of the property.
(:
((
c
(m1 ,r, qtl)
(,
Planning Commission Minutes
June 10, 19 81
Page 3
USCS
fromrvill
in the area. The
alurninurn materialbe flat.
out.side of the building wilIand will be white in color.be made
The roof
Conrad asked n/hat the building will look likesj-nce j-t is so low will the people passing bybe able to see the roof? Bob indicated that-well screened and that the use on Lot 2 wi1lthis use.
from the roadon the road onlythe site wi 1I bealso help in screening
Frank Beddor, the applicant, indicated that the materials beingused on the roof are. much more.expensive than what they co"ia -
have used but what they are using will look nicer. getdoris interested in setting off his building, concerned with theIooks.
ReolJt Requests , Lots 15,L6, t7 ,27, 28 and 29, Minne$rashtaCreek 2no Addition:
.A. motion rvas made by Conrad seconded by Watson to close thePublrc Hearing. A11 voted in favor and the motion was carried..
Motion was made by.H. Noziska and seconded by W. Thompson torecornmend to the City Council to approve the subject iequest wthe conciition that the applicant submit the appropriate -hardsh
and mylar documents necessary for recording and that the propein question be assessed additional trunk sewer and water irnitsas per the north servi.ce area public j.mprovement project. Allvoted in f avor and the moti.on r^ras carried.
irh
e1I
l'lark Koegler from Schoell and Madson stated that the City Council\^/ants to know which alternative t.he planning CoNnission prefers.
Trunk l.Iighway 101 Realignment Conce pt Study Review:
The 5 alternatives for realignmentto the Planning Commission.
of Highway 101 were presented
I^Jatson indicated that she like aI t.ernate #2Conraci agrees.but #5 is more workable.
Noziska Iike #r because of the strai_ghtness. part.ridge like #2if cosL is no object buL if cost is the object bhen f6.
l^J. Thompson inclicatccl LhaL lic like a conrbination of *2 and *5.
A vot-c ,,{as t.a},:cn bl, th" planning Conunission to see whichnativcs \rere best Iiked. #1-0 , #2-J (r\ratson, partridgo,
ii3-0, +4-0 , #5-2 (t,I. Thonrpson and ti. ttoziska) .
a I ter-
Conrad),
(
-Planning Corunission Minutes
June 10, 19 81
Plannj.ng Commj.ssion feels that alternate #2 is the best but if
cost is a factor then alternate #5, but both alternative need
some chang.j.ng .
ppr vaI of Minutes
A motion made by Watson and Seconded by W. ThomPson to note
the City Council minutes of Aprj.l 6,13,20 and May 4, 11,
and 18, 1981. AII voted in favor and the motion was carried'
Commissioner Pres entation Howard Noz i ska pr j.nc ip les of P assrve
Solar Cons truction:
NoziSkagaveaslidepresentatj.ononPassivesolarconStruction.
AOI ourment
A motion was made by Noziska and seconded by Watson to adjourn'
AI1 voled in favor and the motion was carried'
I..!.-
l,linutes
Chanhassen Housing and Redevleopment Authority Meeting
May 21, 19 81
Chairman Gullickson called the meeting to order atwith the following members present: Commissioners
and Niemeyer. Conmissioner Whitehill was absent.
7:30 p.m.
Bohn, Russel,l , Gullicks
Downtown Redevelo nt Pro ect A reements : Scott Martin,ree developmentExecutive Di rector, explained that aII
agreements for the Downtown Redevelopment Project had been
approved by the City Council on May 18, 1981.
Kraus-Anderson Aqreement: Martin ex plained that the KA
agreement was unch;'ngedfrom that reviewed by the HRA onApril 9, 1981. Crai! l4ertz, Assistant City'attorney, pointedout that neither the KA or Bloomberg agreement requires thedevelopers to maintain the pubtic courtyard being constructedby the HRA as part of the project.
The Comnissj-oner's reviewed his legal opinion of I{ayconcerning funding options for courtyard maintenance,decided to delay any specific action until such costsdetermined during the final design process.
Bloomberg Companies A gr eemen t: Mextz reviewed.
19, 198r
and
are
-)changes in the BC agreement since Last reviewed
No substantial revisions had been agreed to byCouncil s j-nce early Apri1.
several language
by the HRA.the City
Instant Web Agreement:City Attorney Russell Laxson presented
changes made to the fW purchase agreement and lease at thedirection of the City Council. He explai.ned that Animal Fairlease payments would go to Instant Web on a sublease agreement.
Niemeyer moved, seconded by Bohn, to adopt Resolution #81-2approving the Kraus-Anderson and Bloomberg Redeveloper
Agreements and the Instant Web Purchase and Development
Agreement and Lease, as approved by the City Council on
May 19, 1981; and authorizing the Chairman and ExecutiveDirector of the HRA to execute all three (3) agreements on
behalf of the HRA. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
Downtovrn Project Bond Sale: I'lartin briefed the Comnissioners
on the status of the proposed first Bond sale for acquisition of
Instant web and possibly the Huber, Havlik, and Riviera
properties. Updated financiaL models are being prePared in
anticipation of a $4-5.5 million bond sale in mid-July, 1981.
A second bond sale to fr:nd all remaining acquisition, reJ-ocation,
and construction is tentatively scheduled for December or
January (1982) , depending on when Kraus-Anderson present their
financing coNoittment for the project.
)
)
HRA Minutes
Page 2
Authorize pre paration of EAW:
Russe1L , to authorize BRW
Niemeyer moved, seconded byoceed with the preparation ofssment Worksheet (EAW) for theat a cost not to exceed $B,OOO,ter from BRW dated IIay 18, 1981.on carri"ed.
Martin suggested scheduling aproposed revisions to theulations of the City Zoning
ely be a time consuming process.
ners Pay Partj.cular at,tention
ct boundaries and permitted
viewing the draft report.
meet on Thursday, June 4, I98Lcil Chambers.
the required Environmental
OId Business: Mike
some resolution toproperty along crea2 years while the Dplanned to see if s
Zoninq ordinance Revis J.ON S :special meetj-ng to review thecommercial and industrial regOrdinance since this will 1ik
He recommended that commissioto the proposed zoning distri
uses in each district when re
The Cofiunissioner's agreed toat 7:30 p.m. in the City Coun
to pr
As seDowntown Redevel-opment project
as outlined in the proposal letA11 voted in favor and the moti
Sglge4!-!+CIE_j9I_Hi shwav 1 0 I /pakora Avenue rntersecrion :Mark Koegler, Planning , Inc.presented a realignment study for Hwy. 101 at Dakota Avenueand W. 78th Street. Five (Sj aifferent alternative conceptplans were revj,ewed and discussed by the Comnissioners.A sixth option, that- of singly impioving traffic signagein the vicinity of the inteisectioi, *.s also discusied.
The general concensus was a preference for alternative #5or some variation of this plan.
. fotgllon appeared before the HRA to request,his dilema of wanting to develop hist P1ains BIvd. He had waited for nearly
ovmtorlrn Redevelopment project was beingomething could be $rorked out wi.th theCity relative to the affect of his proposed liquior storedevelopment on City plans to improv- Gieat plajns BIvd.
Niemeyer suggested that staff contact the adjoining propertyowner to the east and determine if land acquisition irom ttrltparty could be woxked out. Adding more land area to theSorenson lot vrould provide for adequate building setbacksoff-street parking, and building site for reasonable deveJ,op-ment of this property, in conformance with the overallRedevelopment PIan of the City. Staff $ras directed tonegotiate with the property owner and proceed with appraisals,as necessary, for the purchase of a portion of the property.
)
)
)
HRA Minutes
Page 3
Establish Regular Meetin g Dates:to conduct regular HRA meetings onmonth until further notice, unlessfor their action.
Commissioner Niemeyer made a molionthe April 9, 1981 meeting.
The Commissioner I s agreedthe third Thursday of eachno business was pending
to adopt the minutes of
Chaj-rman Gullickson made an amendnent to the above motion, todelete the motion made by him and the following paragraphon page two of the minutes concerning park I because the motionfailed due to a lack of a second. Niemeyer accepted theamended motion and the motion was seconded by Commissj_onerBohn, Al-1 voted in favor and the motion cariied.
At 11;45 p.m. a moti-on was mad6 by Cornmissioner' Russelland seconded by Bohn to adjourn. A11 voted in favor andthe motion was carried..
Scott A. l4artin
Executive Director
)
r!-
fit
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
CHANHASSEN PI,ANNING COMMfSSION MEETING
HELD JUNE 10, 1981, AT 7:30 p.M.
CHANHASSEN CITY HALL
Members Present:Chairman A.H. Noziska,
M. Thompson,
B. waibel, C
APPROVED ON
Partridge, C. Watson, W. Thompson,
and L. Conrad.
. Thompson
MerLz, M. Koegler and B. Foreman
Members Absent :J
-)
Staff Present:
Rezoninq.Subdivision, and S j-te Plan Review Request, Park T\"roPubIic Hear ing:
Bob Waibel, City Planner, submitted his report to the planning
Commission. Waibel indicated that there is sewer available forthis property and that the Comprehensive plan shows the subjectproperty to be zoned Industrial. Waibel_ explained that part-ofthe subject property is in the flood plain and the staff iswaiting to hear cornments from the DNR and Riley purgatory CreekWatershed District. Parts of the building sri11 be earth sheltered.The applicant has not submitted a landscape plan yet. Waibel
recommended to the Planning Commissj.on to continue this public
Hearing until- all the applicants informatj.on has been submj.tted.
Steve Krenz, a representative for park Two, indicated that hehad received a letter from the Watershed Distri.ct stating thatthe Watershed District is requestj.ng a 100 foot easement, a50 foot easement had been proposed but the increase is beingconsidered. Krenz indicated that Block I has an unusual contour,27 foot difference from one side of Block to other, which createsa drainage problem, Also applicant is requesting 2 accessesonto #17. One on the Nt and one on the S!, applicant is askingfor consideration. Krenz stated that as for emissions there isnone for Instant Web, they use a non heat set and no dryer forthe ink so there is no emissions.
Waibel indicated that staff feels no
on *17, #17 will be a main road whenCity Engineer agrees.
access should be granted
HW 212 gets built. Ihe
Applicant is requesting to have such things as service stations,garden store, restaraunts in this Industrial Park.
waibel indicated that some of the busi-nesses from the downtownarea stilL need places to relocate. Some have requested to belocated in this Park.
Krenz requests that Park Two be zoned to include all the requests.
WaibeI indicated that the ordinance doesn't allow for that flex-
ability. I4ay have to zone lot by lot but doesn't like spot
zoning. Waibel would feel more comfort.able zoning by district.
f
Jules Smith, a representative for park One,by district is a good idea but not for thisthis area as P-3 and then later rezone agaj.nunnecessary work.
indicated that zoningproject, to zoneis a lot of extra
Krenz indicated that there is a time factor here. Instant Webhas to be out of there building by a certain time and into their
new building for the Downtown redevelopment project. The samegoes for the others who want to buy some of the l-ots becausethey are also moving because of the redevelopment project.
Krenz indicated that they mayto the west and make the frontp1ain.
possibly move the proposed roadIots wider because of the flood
)
Wa ibe Iall of
I init
area .
stated that if Lot 2 of Block 3 wants a restaraunt thenblock 3 could be zoned P-3. Smith stated that wouldthem because service stations are not allowed in a p-3
Darrell Fortier, the architect for Instant Web, ind.icated thatit is important for Lot 3, Block 2 to have 2 accessess. Itsdesirable to have a convienant access for a restaraunt,. Ifa restaraunt would be built on this lot the access wouldnrt benoticabl-e from the passing traffic because of the 20t slope.
Motion made by W. Thompson and seconded by C. Watson to continuethis public hearing to the 24th of June. A1I voted in favorand the motion was carried.
Fortier explained that Instant Web j.s building a 200,000 squarefoot building and would be able to share an access vrith Lot 2.
They will have 300 employees and the offices are disconnectedfrom the main building. They plan to burm considerably andplan to drain water to the rear with a smal] holding pond inthe front. The lighting wiII be down and wonrt glare on other
)
Planning Commission l,linutes
June 10, 19 8I
Page 2
Craig Mertz, Assistant City Attorney, explained that they can'tintroduce into the zoning district lnything that is not in theordinance unless they change the ordinance.
Art Partridge asked if the subject property coul-d be zoned p-4instead of P-3. waibel indicated that p-4 wourd be more restrictive.Canrt grant use variances, the ordinance would have to be changed.
Mertz indicated that it would be possible to have some lotsP-3 and C-3.
)
? lann ing
June I0,
Page 3
Corunission Minutes
I9 8I
uses in the area- ?hefrom aluminum materialwill be f1at.
outside of the building willand will be white in co1or.
be made
The roof
Conrad asked what the building wiII look likesince it is so low will the people passing bybe able to see the roof? Bob indicated thatwell screened and that the use on Lot 2 wiltthis use.
from the roadon the road onlythe site will beal-so help in screening
-)
Frank Beddor, the applicant, indicated that the materials beingused on the roof are much more expensive than what they coul-dhave used but what they are using wilt look nicer. getdor
is interested in setting off his building, concerned with theIooks.
Mark Koegler from Schoell and l,ladson stated that the City Councilwants to know which alternative the Planning Corunission prefers.
Replat Re ue st s, Lots 15, 15,L7, 27, 28 and 29, I,lj-nnewashtaCreek 2nd Addition:
A motion was made by Conrad seconded by Watson to close thePublic Hearing. Al-I voted in favor and the motj_on was carrj_ed..
Motion was made by H. Noziska and seeonded by W. Thompson to
recommend to the City Council to approve the subject request withthe condit.ion that the applicant submit the appropriate hardshelland mylar documents necessary for recording and that the propertyin question be assessed addit,ional trunk sewer and water unitsas per the north service area publ_ic jrprovement project. AIIvoted in favor and the motion was carried.
Trunk H j.ghway I0L Realiqnment Concept Stud y Review:
The 5 alternatives for realignment of Highway tOI were presentedto the Planning Commiss ion.
Watson
Conrad
indicated that she like alternate *2
agrees.
but #5 is more workable.
Like #1 because of the straightness. Partridge like #2is no object but if cost is the object then #6.
W. Thompson indicated that he Iike a combination of #2 and #5.
Noziskaif cost
A vote was taken by the Planning Commission tonatives were best Iiked. *1-0, #2-3 (Vlatson,
+3-0, #4-0, *5-2 (W. Thompson and H. Noziska) .
see whi-ch
Partridge,
a I ter-
Conrad),
)
)
Planning Corurission M j.nutes
June 10, 19 81
Page 4
ADDro vaI of Minutes
Planning Corunission feels that alte:nate ;2cost is a factor then alternate *5. but bothsome changing.
A motion made by Watsonthe City Council minutesand 18 , 19 81 . Al- l voted
Commissioner presen
Secondei by W. ThompsonApril 6, L3, 20 and Mayfavor a::d the motion was
is the best but ifalternative need
to note4, ll ,carried.
and
of
in
tation Howard Nc: i.ska Pr inc ip Ie s of PassiveSolar Construction:
Noziska gave a sride presentation c:r passive solar construction.
Adi ourment
A-motion-was made by Noziska and se:onded by Watson to adjourn.AI1 voted in favor and the motion wrs carriEd
)
)
)
CITY OF '7.a
EHINHISEEN
690 COULTER DRIVE . P,O. BOX 147 ' CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
MEMORANDUM
TO:
EROM:
DATE:
SUBJ :
Ivlayor and City Council-
Don Ashworth, City Manager
,ru1y 20, 1981
Kerber Drj-ve, Set Special Assessment HearingDate, (August ?{, 1981")
The above title reflects action required by CounciI.
CITY OF -lb
EHINH*lSSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE . P.O. BOX 147 . CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
I'lEIUORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ :
Mayor and City Council
Don Ashworth, City Manager
JuJ,y 20, 1981
Downtown Redevelopment Project, 198L Bonding, SetSpecial Meeting Date
Assuming the City Councit acts this evening to approve the siteplan for the new Instant web buitding, a definite change will haveoccurred in the overall_ model for bonding the first phase of theDowntown Redevelopment Project, Specifically, the previous modelcontemplated construction, by Instant Web, of 110,000 sq. ft,The building, as presented in the site plan this evening, representsiapproximately 200,000 sq. ft. This factor, again, significanttychanges the previous tax-flow anarysis (even using tha higher interestrate of 11,258 vs the previous estimated interest rate of l-0.9?).
Mr. Beddor has stated his willingness to modify his contract withthe City to ref l-ect and guarantee the construclion of the 200,000sq. ft. facility.
Both this office and the City's f inancj_aL consultant, Bob Sander,believe that the city shourd not speculate on future interest ratesunl-ess revenues are less than required. This r4ras thecase in the previous modeI. However, such is not the case today andthis office would recommend that the city councir set a special meetingdate of Thursday, July 23rd, 5:00 p.m. to receive negotialed bids forthis project. At the present time, a net interest rite of approximatery11.258 is anticipated (down from the 11.4t previously receivEd) . It ispossible that the market will further drop during thl next 30-dayperiod; however, knowing the si,gnificant number of trlunic ipaI,/Cou;ty,/state bonding issues which have been postponed., as the maiket begins todrop, these issues wj,L1 come back into the market and thus keep ihemarket from making any drastic drops. Again, this office cannotrecommend speculating if revenues are avairabre to assure debt retire-ment.
C
,O'*
J! ly l.l, lglj/
t{, /15 fi)o 6ener.l 0b liq.t loo lnr lncrgtlent 8ond., .t _l--eSL_s_ejl9:_l
Itr rl|laled loo ll
0
c
0
L
T
6
Acqursrtton anrl relocat ion oflflst.nr tcti, I n(.
lu/xt! lor earnrst fionc, opttons
dr'd d(qur!iltut! lUr ottur ptuperttes
ln9 r nrer tn9 ft+sl.!rtalturd I terest
l!5udfl!e erpei:es
lJ, !U0,0u0
4 00, U00
?i10, uou
-___9!,-q!!Iotil Eond lstue
oeut Servlce/C.rh flor An.lrsls - T.r lncrunert rlth lnetdn! taeb dr lllluLr{)t)
Stdrt 0ate
(l)
8-l-81
12t (5)(l)(4)
0At t Pll lrit I PAI Coumi tiltlttsT
TOTAL
PT ITC IPAL
ll{1, |nTflit5I
rAPl TAL l2t0
ltrIllrL.;T
IOIAL
IriLtlt tltT
lr L vLtlut s
(b)
t5UU,000
(8)
CtT JIAII YT
cAsI
SUTPTUS
{euLUiul 6
Attr i Lf 5s
cutuxl 5)_
500.000.00
2,11,{t'0.r,0
? t,rl3-ot)
llt,5/n. 'Ju59.1t 4.50
I15,u55.50
I /8,99e.00
/55,l4u.5u
Jlr;/,y54.uu
{5U,5U!. UO
1,829,,/r0. )0
ltt (e)
!8-
d-
a-
8-
8-
U.
B.
8-
8-
t,-
8-
a-
u-
8-
8-
-81
-a2
-81
-lJ4
-d5
-86
-8i
-d8
- ll9
-90
-91
-9i
-94
-95
-91
-98
-99
I 510,{-.i7.50
5r0,4J7 .50
5 r0,4J,/. 50
529,8i5. u0
5?8, /50.00
525,91i'.50
520, J12.50
5I 1 ,8ir5.00
49t ,bt2.5(t
4 ilt, I25.00
452,U12.50
4?t,8./5.U1
J8?,tUJ.00
.ll4.h8;f.50
zl8,4Jt.50
2t0.917.5U
l.J2,llt7.50
J9. r7 5.09
I 510,41/.!u
5.t0, {J/.50
5J),41/.5U
5J9,rJl5.1r0
553, /5!1.00
5t\.9i/.50
595,lI?.50
oJo, u75. u0
bl2,atz.5b
/0r,l15.Uo
/ll.lt./5.0u
uu/,5u1. t 0
8J4,6Ui'. iU
lt/u,4J,/.ru
9!i. tu./.50
llry- J,q4!
I -0-
?/1.898
:lI l,!50
5Jl,I4.l
sElJ,40l
ou9,04l
ol9,lrul
r,,l ,4 54
0I0,o14
ItxlJ.t, t5
9lr),l.i2
l, ul u. Jol
1.0M,952
I, I l.J.40fl
l|,!!t !1_r
150.01$
!!zE !!ta
I ,4LI
l.o4l
I.UJT
l.llr
I .;,1r
I. J1X
l.{llI.!lr
l.5tir
I.bUI
?.utt
?.la,l
5.,UI
-0-
-0-
-0-
5,000
10,00{.)
25,000
5U,000
/5,000
lz5,uu)
t 75.000
?25,AN
? /5, Otro
:r5u, m0
4?5. U00
5t 0, (xX)
ll(I), u00
700,0u)
t ?5, u(xJ
I I . 25I
u .?5
lI.z5
1I.25
ll,25ll.?5
11.25
I i. ?5
Il. ?5
l I.25
1I.25
11.25
6-l
8-I
8-l
1) .25
11.25
11 .25
!L_!!,_q!.!.0 !r!,t-u!ri.!.0 !5rg!91
Qualrfrcarl dfld Ass|npt ion5 uje{, rn
2
l
The--t'r increr&t reuenuc pro.r€ctions us€d in this anarrsra rer€ prcpared b, B*t, lnc., d crrpan, hayrrgcrpertlse ln rating such proJcc ool.
le.ssrned th€ bdtdi iould be sold at dn arerage coupon rate ot ll.?51 or betrer.
l€ h'te llot 'ade any groJEtlon of rnvestaen! lrlc(re r€dltred tr(,r the captraliaed lntereat, conttru.tlo|| lurl(,,ff- th€--rndr..ttd-.nru.t turplqi geoer.rcd e..h ,rdr. lt ruutd s.elll rGdr;nrbte to arsrne ttrai ,,J,- i;r;ri;;ir co.e-getrerdtcd dt U r.te rtll oot, tqrrotc lhe ltndr[tdl frasrr,rtrt; ut tnrs projecr i"o -ii. i.ip*_ii"i
The fininclng contelplaled t! aubJect to thc unqlalttted dpprovrng optolon ot Uund couosel.
Juttnt L t00ut, ln[.
Aftd.er (J le lterr,
!! 1!]llrl
UTBI
:tNvlLt
LUItXA![
lPr{t I lur5
\UKILI,'S
Prll5(uR[[nl
YtAli
Irt vl.iut I
ulYfirL0 8Y
LotrJtlri 5
ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
Letter to Bill Monk dated JuIy 7,Watershed District regarding CpT
1981 f rorn Riley-Purgatory Creek
Letter f rom IvlN Dept. of Trans . toT.H. 5 at Jct. CSAH 17
Bifl l4onk regarding S.P. I0O2
Scott Martinrs letter toPlanning Intern.James Garvey confirming appointment AS
Letter to Don AshworthJuIy 6, 1981
from Moodyrs fnvestors Service dated
Memorandum from Scott Martin toEstates (Outlot B)
Craig Mertz regarding Lotus Lake
Marcy Kurimchakrs fetter to Mayor and Council dated July 15, 1981Letter to I'1r. Will-iam Sando attached.
Letter from Allen Gray dated July 14, 198L to Don Ashworth
Ivlemorandum to Russ Larson from Don Ash$/orth regarding Billings
Itlemorandum from Russ
Referendum
Larson to Don Ashworth regarding Police
Letter dated .Tuly 15, 198I to Don Ashworth from Boarman Architects
Letter to l,layor from Eden Prairie Schools
Letter to Mayor dated July 15, 1981 from Board of Hennepin County
Commissions
Letter to BiIl Monk regarding Kerber Drive
Notice of Special Term Motion, Lovetang vs. Bloomberg
)l-!t/,"itt
Riley- Purgatory Crceli W:rtershed District
8950 COUNTY ROAD $4
EDEN PFIAIRIE. MINNESOTA 55344
l>
r
l1r. BiIl Monk
City of Chanhassen
690 Coulter Drive
Chanhassen, Ifinnesota 553r7
Re: CPT Development: Chanhassen
Dear tIr. Monh:
Likewise, rhe Dis tricr iserosion problem occurring
Ju1-y 7, I9 81
A^-
,,il:,'".
orruo;;:::ructry
The engineering advisors fo the Board of Managers ofCreek Llatershed District has reviewed the prelininary plansDistrict for the CPT Development in Chanhaisen. Base-d'upon
-E-o
daEe regarding this project, the following policies andlJatershed Disrrict are applicable to rhis proiL.t.
In accordance nith Section E(2) of the DisErictrs Revised Rules andRegulations, a grading and land alteration permit will be requiredfrom the l,Jatershed DisEricr for this proiect. Accompanying rhlsPermlt application, a detalled erosion control plan for the enEiresite outlining how sedjment will be controlled ioth during and afterconstruction musE be submitted to lhe DistricE for review and approval .
A grading plan showing both existing and proposed conlours musE besubmitted to rhe Disrricr for review ana ippioval.
the Riley-Purgaro ry
subnitted to the
information knor.-n
criEeria of the
I
2
3 A detailed storm seLrer plan outl-ining how sEormwater rrill ultimatelybe handled from the development site nus! be submitted to the Districtfor review and approval.
The DisErict is extremely concerned rriEh Ehe ultimate handling ofsformlrater in Ehe drainageway located in part on the west sidc of rhesiEe. Severe erosion i.s occurring in this drainagervay resulting insedi-rnentation reaching Rice llarsh Lake located dovusEream of the CpTProperty. rl)e detailed storm se\^rer plans required to be subllitEed,as noted in paragraph 3 above.must include detail-cd plans showing
!o!, storrr{rarer runof! -in chis clraina-gEi-ay wiI u-]--rimare11, be iranJlcdthrough the CPT property. ---'"i'-' r ! -
also concerned rvith the potcnEial of anfrom ttre ouEflow dlscharge fron the proprcsed
+*-
-ffi:F
sedimentation basin l.cated southeast of the phase r project. plans andcalculations showing that an erosion problem will- not oc-cur because of theoutflow dischargc from this basin must be lncluded as p,rt of the sitcrsoverall stornwater plan to be submitted for rcview and approval. ThesedimcnEation b.rsin must provide sufficient detenllon tir. fo, natcrialuith a particlc size of 0.1 mm and grcater carriecl In stomwater runofffrom a l0-year frequency storm to settle out.
Thank you for the opportunj.ty to comnent on this developmcnt at an earLydate. If you have any questions, please call us at 920_0655.
ilr. Bill Uonk
Page 2
July 7, I98l
RCo/ 11r
c: All llanagers
Mr. Frederick RLchards
l'1r. Tlm Keene
I1r. Jlm Engler
S incerely ,
t . Oberneyer
ENGINEERING CO.
Engineers for the Dis trict
$
i$[#u .L1
Minnesota
DoparIll'lL-l'lt of Tritt ts1-r()rtil tiol-I
Di-slrict 52055 No. Lilac Drivc
Golden VallcS', i\'lilll-lcsola 55.122
June 29, 1981
Mr. t,lilliam Monk
City Engj-neer
City of Chanhassen
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, I{innesoEa 55317
(( 2) 545:]7(il
please contacE
. Ka1cz at 545-37 6L
Re s.P. 1002 T.I{.5
At Jct. CSAH 17
If you have any additional questions in regard-to this subject'
our Dj,sErict Liyoot, Research and DevelopmenL Engineer llr' J' S
exL. 150.
re)t lSi
I,l ra or d, P,E
DisErict Engineer
RECEIVED
JUL - 2 1981
CITY OF CHANHASSEN An Eqntl Opporturtitl- EtnPlol'er
"d:it-o
I
a./
Dear I{r. Monk:
ile have reviewed the possibility of a Srade separated crosslng for Ehe above
referenced l-ocatlon and offer the follot+ing coments:
- Funding Presently available to Mn/DOT allows for almost no consErucEion
other than that necessary to maintain and preserve existing trunk highways
and complete the Interstate sysEem. We do not antlciPate a slgnificant
change in funtling levels ln the foreseeable future' I'lhile an inEerchange
may f,e desirable at Ehis location, such a project would have to be managed
ani paid for by others with very little, if any, I'In/DoT Participation'
-weesEimaEethatadiamondinterchangewouldrequireanadditional20'acresof right of way (not including frontage roads)'
- If an interchange were to be constructed, it would be necessary to eliminate
any intermediut. ,cc."s points between TIl 107 and CSAH 17'
- While we do not have any long range upgrading plans for TH 5 in this area
at the Present time' o,ri b."i gueis is that TH 5 will be a four lane
divided roadway vith intersectj"ons at grade in the fuEure'
,1
i
?
690 COULTER DRIVE . P.O, BOX 147 . CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
CITY OF ip.--
ffiEfl&}frElfr$$EBfl ltr,r-l/r)-
.v
July 10, l-981
Mr. ,fames E. Garvey
4504 44th Avenue SouthMinneapolis. MN 55406
Dear Jamie:
This letter is to confirmfor the City of Chanhassen
ef f ectj-ve July 20 , 1981.
your appointment as planning intern
Community Development Department,
As we previousJ.y discussed, your internship will expire on Septem.ber25, 1981, unless mutuall-y extended by the City and lourself,
You will be paid at a rate of $5.00 per hour. However, becausethis is a ljmited, temporary, position, you will not be eligiblefor benefits provided to permanent, fulI-time city employeei.
You will report directly to me during the course of your intern-ship. We will have an opportunity to discuss your specific dutiesand respons ibj-l ities when you report to work on l"londay, .Iu1y 20 ,1981 at 8:00 a.m.
I would Iike to welcome you to the Cityon-the-job experience wiIl be benefj-ciaIof Chanhassen.
Staff. , .I 'm sureto both you and
th is
the City
Sincerely,
ScrsUt TYW;N
Scott A. Martin
Community Devel-opment Director
Don Ashworth, City Manager
Kay xlingelhutz , City Treasurer
SM:bf
MoodyS lnvestors Servrce
Mr. Donald AshworthCity ManagerCity of ChanhassenCity Hall
7 610 Laredo Drive
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55 317
Dear Mr. Ashworth:
ED : v1w
99 Church Street,Ne,, York, N.Y.1OOO7
212 553.0300
)
lJ".^-ri)r,/
CC f
1b.l s!
i^Ie with to inform you that our Rating Cormnittee hasassigned che rating of Baa 1 to the $4,715,000 Chanhassen,Minnesota General Obligetlon, Unlimited Tax Bonds to besold July 6, 198f.
In order that we may mainEain the currency of thisrating over the period of the loan, we will require currentfinancial and other updating information. We will appreciateyour continued cooperation in the future.
Enclosed please find our credit report on the abovereferenced bond sale.
Sincerely yours,
-fLu/* SA^,,2-V.J
cc:Ms. Dianne McGibbon
Juran & Moody, Inc.
114 East 7th StreetSt. Paul , Minnesota 55101
- RECEIVED
JUL 1 0 tggl
XITY OF CHANiIASSii\I
July 6, 1981
Freda Stern Ackerman
Senior Vice Pres ident
O MOOOY'S INVESTORS SERVICE/GENERAL OBLIGATION.SPECIAL TAX
Municipal Grcdit Report
aALE: $4,715,0O0 bonds for bids July 6. plcase see last page for details.
RATING: Baa
CHANBASSEN. IIINNESOTA
Final information on this sale was received
OPINION: The adequate financial cperationsthe already deteriorated debt position whichand future issues now comtemplated.
Tlpe uni t : Ci ty
strl nY: chanhassen is a suburban residentiat conununity located eleven milessouthwest of Minneapolis. Its accessiblity to major trighways, water andsewer facilities has encouraged both commercial and residenlal developmenrsince the mid 1960's. Building permit valuations over the past two yearsending in l98O registered substantisl increases over previous years. Thelocal economy, although expanding, is still Iimited, ;ith many residentscorunut ing to other communities within the metropolitan area for employment.The population is growing and is eharacterized by socio-economic indicatorsabove the state urban level. Debt burden remains above the median, althoughit is down substantialiy from the 13.o percent reported in previous years andis manageable as most of the debt currently outstanding is payable in thefirst instance from special assessments. Bond retirement ii 3tow, as morethan $6.0 million of debt currently outstanding must be refinanced '/sithin thenext trro and one-haIf years, incl.uding $990,0O0 in 1981. Financialoperations continue to be maintained in adequate condition, as evidenced byyear-end general fund cash surpluses and fund balances reported for each ofthe past three years.
Redevelopment plans for the central business district and other areas withinthe city could result in additional bonding of more than $lO.O millioninclusive of this issue but depend upon the outcome of negotiations nowunderway with prospective developers as well as the utltimate success ofearlier phases of the redevelopment program. Tax increment revenue wh.i.ch isexpected to pay 100% of debt service on this and future issues of taxincrement debt are expected to be realized beginning in 19g2. If theincrement revenue is not sufficient as projected, debt service will be paidfrom the tax levy, placing an added strain on general debt service andoperating resources which must already acconunodate added expenses due toref inanc ing requirements.
offset
this
I
June
and
is
30
an expanding economy,
further s tra i ned with
)
Incorporated: 1967
County: Carver /Hennep i n
S!'SA: Minneapol islst Paul
rHIS REPORI IIAY IIOI BE REPROOUCED IN WHOLE OR IN PART IN AIIY FORM OR IIANNER IVHATEV€R.
It 's lurnished by Moodl s.lnvestors Service. lnc. al your request under your subscnption .gre€me^t tor your 6xctusive use. The rntormat,on herern h.s been, ooralneo Ircm sourcos Dolleved to be accurat€ and reliable, bul because ol lhe possibilrty of human and ;echanical €rror ils accuracy or completeness rs nol.,/ Buaranteed.
llggJ-"-TIIC:-"-r" 9?,lions. not.recommend.lrons to buy oi sell, end lherr accuracy rs nor 8u..anteed. A ratrnS shoutd b€ werShed sotery as one ,actor rn anrnveslmenl docrsrcn, and you should mako your own sludy and evalualron ol any issuer whoso a€curfies or debt obitgatro.s you co;sder buyinS or s.[rn8.
1119?1:_9L:9'ry1-"1-Pldtmunicipal bonds and notes, prel€rled stock and comm€.cial paper which ar€ rared by Moody s rnvestors service, tnc.. have. prior rorecsrvrn8 tho r.trng, egr€€d to pay B te€ to Moody's to. the apprais5t and ratinS servac€s. Tie te€ r.nges ,rom t lOb !o t45,OOO.
X@dr'r lny..to.. SGdi../99 Chsrcn Str..r. N.r yort, N.y. I OoO 7/r.t.: (2 r 2 ) Ei 3.O3oo
Debt burden: 9-9!6
Debt per capita: $3.383
% due in l0 years: 40.2J6
Med. fan. income i S13.452
F. V. per capita: $34,273
Avg. annuAl grovth F.V.,
lg77 -l97Bt 25 .7%
July 2, 19 81
G
Year Value( 000 )t977 s22,957t978 22,963
197 9 24 ,8941980 29 . 183l98l 37,868
' After fiscal disparities
Equol lzation rate : 17.5%l'ul I value: $216,571,63.1
Channassen, l, i nnesota
Yea r
-Populat ion----
---percent Change- --
Debt Statement: (as of 6,/1,/81) in OOO:
Bonded debt outstanding $14.662Current offer i ng (7/6/87) 4.215
Gross bonded debt $ 19,382
Unfunded debt
contractural obl igat ions $ 1Ltr
Gross direct debt $19,498
Less : Debt ret irement funds I . 915Direct net debt $t7.s8g
Over lapping debt: Anount ___Lcaruer, county $5.570 22.o 1,225
Chaska. ISD# 112 6,479 3r.8 2,063
Metro Counci I 34,990 .34 r l9Metra Transit 16,500 .36 59Other 77 ,126 var. 327
Overal l net debt $21,376
Cit], State U.S
'Sourccs: U.S. Bureau of Census
Defaul ts: No record fouDd
Due (000)TotalIn 5 years 44,117In 10 years 7 ,797
Security: G.O. ULT. payable in the firstinstance from tax increment revenue.
Structure: Excluding balloon payments ciue1981, 1982 and 1983, principal pavments
essentially decline. B8,lloon pa)'ment s are
to be refinanced prior to maturity.
ari-*
.05
8.4
17 .2
contribution
19 50
1960 244
1970 4 .891
1980 Prelim.6,3l{)
,,aa,
29.1
.1 .5
8.5
1.4
Chanhassen
6.8
14.5
1r.5
Area. sq. mi . : 2i] sq. nri .
Popul at ion density: 275,/sq. mi.
DEBT FACTORS: Debt. burden is well above the nredian, but down sharply from the13.8% reported in 1978. In addition, roughly ZE% of direct net debt ispayable in the first instance from special assessments against benefittedproperties. Debt consi.sts of more than $6.O million of temporary improvementvJhich must be refinanced, within the next two and one-half years'. firlsfinancing excludes the roughly $10.9 million of acldition tax increment bondsalso contemplated for the future. Bond retirement is s1ow.
ln
due
-------Principal Maturl ties1981 S 990 1988 $8801982 4,O97 1989 8701983 2.565 1990 5401984 830 1991 5601985 845 1992 5951986 810 1993 5851987 830 1994 520
(o00)-------
1995 $61O
1996 725
1997 8401998 980
1999 520
2000 190
)
--------Rate of Ret i rement--------Bonds Amount % of
2r.2
40 .2
Ci t ies under 10,000 population
Use of bond proceeds: Proceeds will be used to finance a portion of thepublic redevelopment cost in the city's tax increment district, a portion ofrrhich comprises the central business district. Improvements wilI includeIand aquisitions and relocation of an existing business,
Bonds authorized but unissued: city contemplates further tax incrementfinancing over the next 4 to 12 months, which could total $10.9 miIIion.However, this additional bond is contingent upon the city s success insecuring definitive agreements with developers of a retail. office complex novin the discussion stages prior to December 1, 1981, the city will reflnanceal1 or a portion $990.0O0, balloon payment due December 1, 1991.
Short-term borrorring: None for operating purposes.
)
Trend: Annual borrower.
)
---Debt Rat iosNet PerDebt Capita Median. %F.V. Median.Direcr s2.?8r.5e S ZOA.es 8.1 3.2%Overall 3,382.81 1.032.29 9.9 4.8
Chanhassen, llinnesota
: l2rE per annum.
CounciL/manager form of government, with a mayor and four
Interest rate limits
COVERNYENT FACTORS:
counc i j persons .
Sc'rv i c.: Provision
lie l fare : Counly
Enterpr i ses /Ut i I it ies: lrater & sewer
School s; lndepcndent SchooI DistIicls
Source of information: Offering statement dated .rune 15, 1981 and annualfinancj.al reports for 1980, 1979, and 1978.
Public employees: City employs 21 fu1I-time and 9 part-t j.me persons .
the Minnesota Publ icPensions: AII fu11-time employees are enrolled in
Employees Retirement Assoc i at ion.
FINANCIAL FACTORS: ceneral and debt service funds continue to be maintainedin adequate condition, evidenced by the year-end general fund cash surplusesand fund balances reported for each of the past three years. The special
assessemnt fund reflects a $2.0 million deficit, as of the end of 1980. $1.9million of the deficit relates to the temporary bond issue of 1978, 1979, and
1980, \"hich are carried as a long-term liability. The $2.0 million at theclose of 1980 represents a reduction of more than 50% of the fund defict
reported at December 31,1979. Tax collections continue adequate.
Financial Data (O00) Fiscal Years Ending 12l31-
-Percent Change-Item 1978 7979 1980 t97A-79 1979-80
General revenues
General expend i tures
General debt service
Year-end oper. loans
Year-end cash surpl us
Year-end rece ivabLes
Year-end gen. fund. baI.
$ 681
600
58
None
166
196
$811
720
None
264
28
297
$85 t
842
70
None
277
25
304
19.7%
20.0
24.1
4.9%
16.9
2.8
59.0
3.4
4S .5
-4.9
-10.7
4.5
---------Sources of 1980 Revenue--------
Propert], taxes 52.2%Other 7 ,9
Intergovernmental Rev. 24 -A
------Items as a % of 1980 Reveoue------
Debt service 8. 2tYear-end cash surplus 32.5
-- -- ---- ----Proper ty Tax Data-------- - --
Tax rate, levy and collection: %
Tax Rate' Uncol l ected
Year Per 1,000 Levy(000) as of 12/31/8O
t 978 515.87 358 1.8
1979 17.67 465 3.8
1980 16.47 526 2.9
1981 18.36 649 In process
9%
9%
Property tax base: Realty & Personalty
Exemptions : Homestead,
and equ i pment .
attached machi nery
Assessing agent: County
Reassessment procedures: Every four years.
Basis of assessment: Av. computed a
percentage of market value, but varies with
classes of property.
Year-end current delinquency: 1979: 3
lgao:2
)
--------Items of r980 Expend i ture-------
Publ ic safety 27.O%
Publ ic works 24.2
Community services lO.2
oeneral Government 18.8
chanhassen. H lnnesota
i Overa I I rate. l98l
$lo1.76
per $l,OO0 assessed
llypothetical
valuc home :
cred i t )
----Tax Base Composition ( l98O A'\'' )----
Residential ?3. ?!r Ag. 6'5S
Co,uunerclal / 12 . 3
Indus tr la1
Per capita trade (197? approx' ): Retail $1'568'
Unemployment: The March 1981 area unemployment
for the state.
CoI Iectlng sgent I CountY'
Taxes due: 5/31 and lol31
Penalties: 8% per annum for hooestead'
Rate and levy I imltations: Per capita levy
i,i.i.til"n tit by "tttt the l980/81 per'
capita levy limit is 3187'92'
tax bilI. $50.000 market
S9l I .41 (before homestead
ECONoIIIC FACTORS: Chanhassen is located eleven miles southwest of Minneirpolis
and is primarily a suourban residential comrnunity' It s accessabill!' t"
major highways ana wate.-and ""'"t facilities ha-s etrcouraged commercial ttnd
residential development "ina" an. mid 196O's. Building permit valuations over
lhe past two years enoing in l98o registered strong increases over previous
vears. The popuation g.E*-6v-*"it itan z sg during the previous decade and
i:-:;;.r;;;rir'"J-uv."ii"-ec-onomic indicators above the state urban level.
The city has for a tong-;i;;-teen recognized as a suburban entertainment
center and retains that tradition today as many of its major employers and
i"* puyu." are entertainment oriented'
The city is nov seeking to further capitalize on its position as an
entertainment center by reaevefopin' i large portion of the central
district to accomnodat" u-rru, hoiel-complei and new retail shoping
;;;-;iii..=. Although employment opportunities within the citv are
Tiiii.i, -"itv' s p"o*i*iiv- 1"' tnu'rr*,l'" ci t ies and other metropol itan
communities lnhances the overall economy '
I tem
l,tEdTan f ami 1Y income
*, below Poverty level
% above $ l5 , O0O
Median school Years
% Hhile collar
% government
% manuf ac tur i ng
------- l9?0 Census of
Name of Taxpayer
Popu I at ion- -- -----State/
chanhassen Urban
s13.452 $ll,024
2.A 5.4
41 .7 24 .9
t2.7 12 .4
61.1 55.6
ll.1 15.7
27 .7 22.7
businessfacilitiesstill
State/
Urban
66.3
64.8
1.3
4.1 .0
25. O
$19.500$ lo8
No.
Empl .
525
135
140
55
50
40
state $3,375
rate was 4.?,6 compared t"o 6.2%
l97O Census of Hous i ng
)
--- - - ---- --Largest Taxpayers
A.V.
chanhassen
f o*rne" occupied 69 9
* l-unit structures 83.3
E Negro hd. hseh I d.
bla. before 1939 24.6
s blt. since 1959 45 7
Owner occ. med. vaI. $29'O0O
Median contract rent s 130
Name o f EimD I over
Bloomberg compan les
H,A. GedneyInstant ued, rnc. ( Pr lnt ing )
Chanhassen Center
Pauley's
R i vera
--------- ---Larges t Emp I oyers---- --- ----
Lakeview Hi l ls
Nev Hor i zon
Dorn Bui lders
Font ier Deve I opers
Northern States
M. A. Gedney
Business (OOO)
Apts. $? 19
Land & Houses 699Apts. 637
Entertainment 489
Utility 455Mfg. 451
)
ED
,|
)
CIUNNASSGN, !'INNESOTA
Legal Dame of issuer:
iLDouDt: $4,715, OO0 c.O.
bonds of 1981, Serles A
Sealed blds until: 3:00 p.M. C.D
Addresaed to: Donald W. Ashworth
Laredo Dr. Chandhassen, |tinesota
Dlte ol bond!: August l, 1981
Ar[ual ltaturtttcr (t ltr OOO)1984 a5 1992 52751985 10 1993 3501986 25 1994 4251987 50 l99s 5001988 75 1996 6001989 125 1997 7001990 176 1998 8251991 225 1999 350
I[tcrcst rltc: fn lntegral multiples of
5/lOO of l1f,; maximum rate, I2lf, per annun.
Clll lcaturGt: Beglnnlng 8/V9I at par.
Avrrrgc lltc ot l.aE6: 14.02 yrs.
July 2
Detalls of Bond Sale
City of Chanhassen
Tax Increment tlurpose: Varioua redeveloprnent projects
r 981
G
RATING: Baa 1
.T., ltoNDAY, irut,y 6. 1981
City Manager, City of Chanhassen,
55317.
ltaturity: Ser. 8,/1/84-99
Denonlnatloo: $5, OOO
76rO
Interelt payablc: 8/1/82 and, semiannuallythereafter on 2/L ar.d 8/1
PaylDg agcDt: To be deslgnated by auccessfulbldder
Dellvery: Wlthin 45 days after date of
award .
Es!l! lor arrsrd: Louest net interest cost.
Good faltb: 894,300
Conaul.taots: Juran & iroody, Inc. Salnt paul .
Securlty: c.o
Legal oplnlon
ULT.
Messrs. LeFevere, Lefler, Kennedy, O,Brien & Drawz,Minneapol is .
LltlgatloD:A no-litigation certificate prov ided.
Eistor"iel
DetG of bond saIG: 5/19/80Aroult: 8f,51O,000 Average llfe: 14,Zl
Purcharer: Dane Bosworth , Inc. & First
Net lnterelt cott: 7.5038rtryrs. lroody's inder: 8.00,tr(Baa, I 5/23/AO)Natlonal Bank of St. Paul.
************
).
CITY OF
EIf,AIIIIfi$$E}fi
690 COULTEH DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147 . CHANHASSEN, ttiltNNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
}IEMOPANDUM
Craig Mertz, Assrt. City Attorney
Scott A, Martin, CoNnunity Development Director
JuIy 13, 1981
Lotus l,ake Estates Recreational Beach Lot (Outlot B)
On July 13, 1981, I personally conducted an on-site inspectj_onof the above referenced property and found that no structures,docks, piers, mooring bouys, (except two (2) permitted canoeracks) or watercraft were located upon this property or in theabutting waters of Lotus Lake.
It is my opinion, therefore, that B-T Land Company and LotusLake Estates Homeowners Association has complied with your"Notice of Default" dated June 29, L981, which ordered the removalof all iIIegaI watexcraft and structures from said Outlot Bof Lotus Lake Estates.
A Public Hearing to consj-der the proposed amendment to theLotus Lake Estates Beach Lot Conditional Use permit has tentativelybeen scheduled for August 12, 1981 before the Chanhassen planning
Commission.
Do
Bo
shworLh, City Manageraibel, City Plannerbw
FROM:
DATE :
DTT.
Nli\
July 15, t98l
Mayor Tom l{amil con &
City Council Members
I was rather upset wich Mr. Sando's
statement that he felC "Carver County
had done a good job on site selection".
He
ir
obviously is uninformed and I took
upon myself co inform him.
I also sent a copy to Mr. Charles
Weaver of the Melro Council and asked
that he file lr with his committee
in opposition Eo Site Selections "D"
and "A/B".
Somy to lmpose anot,her one of my
"novels" on you, but I never could
answer a quesEion with a simple "yes"
or "no" either.
L-,t ')'7 tz-t-,ct,L.J
Marcy Kurimchak
July lzr, l'tr.l
----
" j.r,rric), Dist,rlct #16 RepresentaElvel , Juncr I
: ,iir tr,' Bl d6,.'cr,,cts.\ 5iui
^i \: ():
:i r 1. ritcd the JuIy l3ch Chanirassen CiEy Cor-'trrciI m..<:rr nr .,. ition5 nosed by Council mcmbcrs. I fclt 1i1r. rlrrr..)(,\l refl c.r:tion of the apprchcnsions and c(rn.., ri,. .l'.' :,n Charrtr6ssen, but ln the entire mctrojrt;. i r.,,
'j r-
'l
. r\ , , . r'r1:lE <ieal of concern a. chLS r.imc ts orrr., L. (,' - -. ':, .. . r,1 \aste Sanitary Landfill site rieiecrions . .t r:, . i', ;,. .'c :; r . (.CEion process by che variolls counties. j ii. . , , ,_,.(,:. ... .: ,...Eu. t t.haC you felC Carvcr County h;rd <irrne a ,,o.,.1 - r rr,',.s
-*,. .;-. ..i,". ;)r '\'(rs.i. I first became con(.('rned about the rnc(.i ( ' ! j , ,t:t-
",'r:. I |e:: (' L f::iC f t)o criteri a, especially permerbility, r,r,1 t.:rrtr_.cat'Li.. r.:iir'- b1 t.'r,' co.'tnittee so thaC Ehe w('stern f)ortion ol rnc- ,rti. hi,F.'' -.i:L... i.1. .:or pler(.1,.' el iminated from consideracion. We r,,o1-, .. r jl i. ,' , c:\- s':.,.r: .:nci i..dvi sor_\' Ccmmitcc(' rncmbers aE a meeting {)n i,r-u..r.\.. ,,r/? hi:.: il'I: s \':s r)ec;rrrs.(. ih:- \...estern ;lor:Eion Of the Counf y waS cLrn.,icrrrr..,. . iir., a! i.-i.-d " fhis *rs r-i.,ohasLzed ovcr and over ,;rg;ri n at f lr,l rn(].":., iir,,.io'r.\,ei:, .:i!-.Jcl-di ng, ro the 1 9i8 c;ri-ver councy Soil survel, ,rrrbl r r,h(rc '.r'.. ine- S. Depa::En.:nt Jf Agric\ll r i.lre, only 4 small pockets o? :.rct r;r, lil . ci i ,9i brime aB,, cxisced in che wesrern area. Most of tire soil ,,, 5 r;ir as.jZ w'l ch i::i.ersDcrsi ons of #5. Accordinc, to Ehe trrs5-4 t1;r1;i1,,,.-";rlthough :i.c tounci.l must evaluate eac[ sice wich :espcci"cr, <of aSriculture, no agricultural lands may be excludrld i.o, ". ,ti itas a po:enClal site unless dcclared by Che MpC.A as inErinsr.c.., ra51e l-or a iandf irl . " r br'orrght thi s ovcrsight to the actenr i i,r, r..Ca.ver CounEy Commissioners on l.ebru ary 27, i'98l . AlinoLt6tt t: .(:Las ::eviewed ac thelr next i .'eting, no correcEive criteria ir, , r <.r,r r..
All ii.ve of rhe 1ar.dfi1l. si.(:., endecl up in the eastern ;.irE::,, )l r
a j L' mosE hc:rvl ly populated , . (ja arrd Ene one wi th the rrro.sE p(rt r1. rr r .r i
- rrrture devr-'l cpment. Ti.i s - en ..i so has the hcaviest conconr ..ri o :h'ec,r'andiir arro r,ilcer.heri rii iri<tr,. Althorrg,h wc havc becn tolG t,l.;iEes can L;e cor.-l-.!-.'..lEc. ar.i or)c,r;rtcd ;rnd dhc g,rotrnd w:ricr stril 1
- Enis ir dl iir.c , r'n)i- rnrpossible ro belreve in view oi whnt r.'..- cd ir- :..uch sI : .. ) ,. rllo paic few years.O('r'.
- .': cl fhese
. ,-'e- (; ' [he
.,-._r' ) .,_
. rr';. cc: lons are i.n chanhirssen. Sirc ,,D,' i. w, J ,:i)0','. . i,tei cr fccclv across t.he ro;iil l rorr! a propu.., i y .. rir l:lcnc; Jnd in close proximlty f o rire r:6gs1r1\ ior). i:- ., t..,r . .,.i Pari . Prevar-1ing wlnds frorn tr)i $ sit! v,.,r.ilo ,ll r t ,.i - r ,tr.aI .r iQ b:r.i noss areas of Chanhasscn, there-, ,ecr,irr.Ci z!r.l;ie economic develOpment of our comn,rrnity.
RECEIVED
JUL 1 5 tgAt
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
--2--
ltr. ,ii l l ram Sando, DlstrlctIletropolicar, Councll #16 Represcntattva July 14. lgSl
Sitc "D".ol:o^i: poorly_drainedl thc loc;rEton of two watershcd dt.striccsa,il wi:hin 1'000 fccc of a na.ural weir a.<t. Trr; i,ir.r i'"-"".rcnt1y rl)c
;:;:.:i,,i.tish11'proctucEive ".r."iiui"-i".i'.p".".ilr,",'iit,'.,.,raE firowclr
sii(' "i/B' , .s locfltcd on property owncrr by rhc Urriveri;i cy or Lr nn(-,sotar.r50;'"-r.;.:. Thi s is tana lrrit-ir;'" ;;;; ;>urcrrascd by puhl rc <lonaEi.r,.:!.rd f:r'.c'rcs, nor for fururc ranariti-iicbs, buc ," ; i;;;-;rea o1 ri...\.t-l owc-s5, .:r orher p1.1nc1if;-i;-;;;"i*i"" chcrr hardincss racror ,rr1.jtlrci r abi'r r-)' Eo s.,irtre-ine "it i",ii- Iirrpcracurcs of Minncsora. A i:r:td-l.li]" tl: ' -. :.,. i:3p,-:-:), ;rould t:ndoubir:riiy De oi:rrrnrc,Eat ro arrl-ur(.con-,': r^s rnd .r.ncs and wour d. jeo,ardi zo tni " ".iv^ i';;;;;.r"a f trr,c. . .rol r,,,- .irbo::eau;n. Ic has a hi gh"prlpoit r.,rn of seasonal ly h.cr soil .-,.is a f \'t we:1.-'nd. rr is ir"""".'.v-liio"ci"n"rrri";h;;ii;;'.;is ran<r ,,,be us:'j b\' .he ArboreErrm.;ii;;';;e"'tl"o.". or sereit,-""ifiire probr.n,s.I;:n;i:S":;:J.,i... prevailins-;i;a; ;;;, cnrs siie-wouiJ-a,.i fr roward
A::,>::c; iiis:urb.n* factor abouc Ehcse site selections is f, ll,*= r,.e .:r.-,ns-' 1oi'r:'r: cr: c-' t..e so1-id r+aste ,otaii"iu'to the sites would ireces.;, . .,:.r.c.'itr.:. :t;.,' r:cav,v cra.fic on rwo_tane-high;.rr;-"i;;;;)r";i;;ti co,r:e"t".j''iG q; i:iierous and scheduled for even rBau corrgu"tion in"rrre very near: u[u]::. Thcse arc Ehe same roao" uica- uy i',"-".r,";l il";;. in thees r::e:ii 2orcioir of rhe counEy in traniooili"e ii"d."c"-iJ".n" rwo el e-re:r;-,r1' schoors in chanhassen and i; ;f,o crr"!r<i-Iii,oii Eirnius, ,.nicr,-'cisi. jEs or- an eLemenrary schoof , ,-.1,]"io. Hlgh School , a.rd a Seniorii! 5n School .
Ano:her itc'm cf ercaE concern is that boch- sites possess ,,1imiced cover;iacerrai". i woJld assume rhis -ii- i-viry important faccor in anerri-cienclv rn.incained. rancrfiii "itE.'"ti,i"
"Ippiiiir.iy'il.1.,"
.r,o.addiEional cover mareriaf in-itre-iiil, ", or.rt, etc., would have tob-' hauled in by even more.tlucks to chese srtes creatrng even morec'rac-':i.'!1 ^n =^'cs, co and rioii-ci" i"iarirr sires as w6ri ". on.cn-nccEins rcads arrd hiehwiyi.
)Lairy of Ehe .sEaEemenEs. nade by carver councy residents ar .Ehe publi-c
'leec-
in;" on iune 2llrh ouescioned ;ir"l;i;;";s or'.ttre-iii"-J.i."iion proccss byEhe ccun:v' "nu ."riau.r-;r;';.;;'iiIi".u.a by che facr Ehac norre or checonniEEee me':rbers lived bv gnv ;i'riu"uito "ui;";i;"":-'A:';o, rnay also beaware, c)m:nissioner JeromL [-6ri-."fi"!"r,tins-vic;;;i; ,;; bhanhassen de-c' rned rr .''oEe on a resolurion io-J[iJia ano rou6h draft sire selccrionrcpori rron che cornmitcce.--trli i.ri"i.fi.ese,rorii""-iio* iie wescern harfoi che counEy oucnumberea :l:;:-iiir'iiie. castern porELon. He also fetE a' Ererncndous emnhasis' was-puc on che distance
". ";";;;";ounry sice h.orrr dr3r i,35 I,iEA i rfi i ":
I'Xs"5i;3r[s::. rus"$ffi"n:::, il. giuilh";f, :,:nfi3;.
I
t
--3--
r.rir. Iiillinnr Sarrdo.. Dtstrlct #16 ReprescnEaf,lvg
- ML-C ropol i t fln Corutc L I
of thc w;rter ls locaEed ln Carvcr County.
Tlunk you.
c. c.
a
si
I
i
11 qtrestlons very much on the minds of cascern CarverqcnEs nowadaysr and ones which I sincercly hope will bcntense conslderatlon they descrve when thl fliral siie -
s made.
Respectfully.
(-,/ ) l.r t, y .'.1,. .... )2t , /)a t.,.
llrs . Marcy Kuri rnchak7130 Uttca Lane
Chanhassen, Mlnnesota 55317
Mr. Charles Weaver, Chairmaniletropol itan CouncLl
Juty lfi, 1991
Theso are
C-oulrty re
5,i ver: chcseleccion
mk
t'
.j-',.
;
I
I
j
i
I
1
I
I
I
l
J uly 14, I981
Mr. Don Ashworth, ManagerCity of Chanhassen
690 Coulter Drive
P. O. Box 147
Chanhassen, Minnesota 5 531 7
Dear Mr, Ashworth:
Sincerely,
People do ask me about Chanhassen, about its
business and political climates, and I respond
more and more favorably all the time. .I've
experience the political part. the business endI know less about, but cite the interest shownby Dunn E Curry as an act of positive faith.
Your patience with the neophyte, as I was, isexemplary. You have helped me understand theother point of view. Your recent support of allof us who felt inlured by real estate taxes wasrrright up front" and in my iudgement demonstra-ted a real concern for integrity.
Please convey my grateful thanks to the counciland to Mayor Hamilton.
l(
Allen G ray./br
RECPlr.rSgl
JUL 1 5 rSSl
RLL€N GRRV
& COMPRNV.
n?:.r,,=,tg
Puc,:- iieicricnr
-,
CITY OF
ffi$flffiffiEflffi$$ffiffi
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147 . CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900
I{EIV1ORANDUM
TO:
FROI4:
DATE:
SUBJ :
Russ Larson, City Attorney
Don Ash$rort.h, City l,lanager
July J.6, 19 81
Eox Chase (Derrj.ck Land Co.)
You have mistakenly included in the accounts payable listing tothe City, various private obligations. SpeciiicaIly, the F6x Chaseaccount was mistakenly bi11ed for hrork carried out by yourserf inUefqf .f of_ Mrs. Kathy Schwartz. Mrs. Schwartz has be-en repeatedlytold by this office that she has no lega1 authority to enter intocontractuar obligations for the city and that, if ihe desired thatthe City Council receive certain types of information, that thoserequests should be placed through this office. Any such i,nformation,if authorized by myself, was submitted directiy to the CityCouncil . If Mrs. schlrartz felt that an), informatioi was beingsuppressed, she had the right to appeal such decision to the CityCouncil -
Billings, Attorney's Office
Your office has long been aware of the above-stated ru1es.again, I will assume that you wiII delete from your bill thework carried out -by yourself in behalf of Kathy Sctrwartz anaMrs. Schwartz under whatever arrangements were mad,e betrveengf y9r, However, in no case, wiII this office recommend. orin the accounts payable the $413.25 presently charged to the
Enc. - Jufy 5, 1981 (paqe 6), City Attorney Bi11j-ngs
cc: Ms. Kathy Schwartz
As such,
pri,va te
b i11the Lwo
inc I udeCity.
0)L'
],rAf.,(L\,lt-'L\'
'i..
.t:s/chanhassen city council
/ trt1, 6, 19 8I
Page Six
Attend ptanning commission meeting on 6/10 for consideration
Park II proposal and review of proposed covenants:
of
Park II
Fox Chase (Derrick Land Co.)
Mirnewashta Creek 2d Addition
Edwards Subdivision
Telcon from BI^l on 6/L5 te
6/18 of easeloent materiafs
write opinion on same :
nccessity of platting agreement; review
submittcd by developer's attorney and
Preparation for Cit]' Council meeting on 6/Li telcons from Mayor
ttamilton and Kathy Schwartz re developmenti telcon from Dave Sellergren
re development contracti conf on 6/\ w/DWA re final engineering and
aiui""g" pl-an and conf w,/BM re grading requirementsi telcon on 6/l
ii"* e1t rL development pl-an; teicon fiom Councilmember Swenson ot 6/2
re section 14 of ordinance 47; telcon on 6/2 w/DwA and council-member
swenson re final plat approval, telcon from Kathy schwartz re samei
telcon w/Dave Sellergren re sarne, corres to atty Eisenberg and Kathy
'schwartz w,/copies of attyts reports; telcon on 6/4 from Kathy Schwartz
ie pernit autirority of watershed district and corp of engineers; telcon
of Z/rc from K, Schwartz re corp of engineerst permit requirements i
conf on 6/LL w/Jtm Orr and BM re drainage problems on s9bject ProPerty;
revier.,r on 6/ll of corp of engineers "notice of application" i teLcon on
i7l tro^ x. Schwartz- re definition of wetlandi conf on 6/15 w/wayor
Hamilton re status of PIat application and review corres from K. Schwartz
re samei telcon on 6/L'6 from-i<. Schwartz re corp of engineers' definition
of rvetland; tel-con on 6/22 from atty sellergren re assessments for
pii.,,,t. and public road construction and re DNR,/EPA,/Corp of Engineer
i:erraits; telton on 6/24 from K. Schwartz re corp of engineersr Permits:
413. 2s
$ 72. s0
on
65.25
Telcon from tsw re changing restrictive convenants to allow for sale
of <iui:Iexes on a tor+nh6use basis; attend planning commission considera-
Li"" tr proposar on 6/LO; review on 6/L6 of revised covenants for
townirouses and corres to BI'l re same: 39-g0
Colonial Grovc II
Cor1Li1c. GD on 6,/16 rc
measurements of dock;
beactr lot condition;
use permi t:
tal:ing picturcs of prescnt status of ouUlot and
telcon w/D!'Jr\ and GD re need to document prcscnt
corres on 6/24 to SAM re signing of non-conforming
2L.7 5
RUSSELL H. LARSON
trRAIG M. MERTZ
I9OO FIRST NAT'ONAL BANK BIJILDING. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 554ct2. PHONE 512 33S.9565
M E.SEA.EJE I_l
_l
4e / ce-I /&-
f o,n- ? 7-3/
OATE
- /"s
' /?.,'i -'3'. t ,('
A V*l/,st, t p..-r
e].,
A
W
( ,/.
.\P o-/oJ, ".-
/{ ' 7l'
TO
_ATE
^,v/.2
L_-,t q^ 4n,nr*
L/"//*i.,
1- tiar/
4to
e,ee
-"cqs,$
L//,/t ,
/- ,..-\
Ur.;^, /"
"J,--.
La-^
./-, /Z
42"-*
,
_a-{e_.U /o-,
^-,/, / -{
ZL1Y44-'L-
t <-9 t.t 7a "l
,ao Ke f ..rcK
r .!., *,1* s
a A..K)
t,
A
A
571 soa
lo ",t J ".
?-.r'4"-
-4-,< 4/4. ->4-//g ///Z+t-l<z-to-&.,-A44--.t-l.
/y'(/ kkzl --*- L
73/-3/
^J"/
"41,..-lLa7'l/ lct
iJ
SIGNEO
'afu,
,7/a.*,
DAz4--/d DZZ
fit/-..-; /e.-...
"c.e J u,-/--, 4-*4 O^.. ^c>/ *4.,-{-L-.*,
{ft"-4}.r:--yc -ric O,o,nc soqd li( soi 3o5, Donoj i..o! 7l2rl
Aa*
r-a^4t/*,- //
R E-P.L Y
"*-//
4?-L
{/""-
BOARMAN ARCHITECTS INC.
71O Chomber of Commerce Building. 15 Soulh Fifth Streel
Minneopolis, Minnesoto 5UO2, 612 339 -37 52
July 15, 1981
Mn. Don As hworth
City of Cha n ha ssen
P.0. Box #147
Chanhassen, Mi nnesota 5 5317
Dear Don;
As you know we have approved the request for final payments
on the City Hal l/Library and Publ ic Works Garage with the
contingencie that the payment be held until such time that
we give the final release.
With this in mind we would like to make sure that you and the
Council are satisfied and in complete agreement that these
projects have been completed satisfactorily as per the contract
documents. The one year t',arranty remains in effect which will
correct any problems which nny arise in occupying the buildings.
There remains a few punch list items to be corrected and other
contractual obligations which must be satisfied before we can
feel comfortable in releasing the final payment.
Ver truly yours,
Svend Andersen
RECEIVED
JUL 1 6 19BI
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
oto
@
t-c)
O)
N
@
0)coEo
(,
cf)ro(o
.:
.E
E
d
G
o
tr
q)
Eo
E(!
o
oo
(.)
lrJ
OJ
co
. district 272. business services
July 14, i981
Mr. Thomas Hami I ton, l4ayor
City of Chan ha s sen
690 Cou lter Dri ve
P.0. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
REFERENCE: COI1PREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN
Dea r l.'1r . Hami I ton :
Please be advised that Independent School District No.272, Eden Prairie
has reviewed your Comprehensive P'lan and does not find that it signifi-
cantly impacts the school district of Eden Prairie.. Thank you for
keeping us appraised of your municipality's plans.
Sincerely yours ,
EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOLS
/1, - //
,t/ /-(,/;2:.,....,.. 7Merle 0. Garnm t
Di rector of Business Services
l40G : pj
cc: Dr. G. l4cCoy
_ RECEIVED
JUL 16 19BI
-CIIY OI CHANHASSEI'I
a
a
a sG sar!tro E
JOHN E. DENUS PHONE
344 3066
Boano oF HENNEpTN CouNry CorrllrrssroNERS
24oo CovERNMENT CENTER
NTIN NEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 554N7
July l 5, 1981
The llonorable Thomas Hamilton, llayor
Cj ty of C han ha s sen
690 Coul ter Dri ve
P.0. Box 'l47
Chanhassen, Mi nnesota 5531 7
incerel v,
Dear Mayor Hami I ton:
Thank you.for your 'letter_of July gth. I have fon,rarded yourcorrespondence to the full County Board and the CountyAdmin'istrator for their consideration and response.
If I can be of further service, please feel free to contact
me.
?b
ommissioner John E. Derus, Chairman
ennepin County Board of Commissioners
JED: nf
RECEIVED
JUL 1 6 1.,081
CIIY OF CHANHASSEII
FU!S'LL X L^Ft5ON
cF^rG r Ff nYt
xlErvc Y f gx^^P
9AFX C A.CLJLLoUGR
City Engineer
MN 55317
L,rrtsox & II rrrrrz
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
I9OO FIRSI E N( PLACC \T'S.
MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 55402
JuIy 15, 19BI
Kerber Drive (USASStreet Improvement
Assessment Hearing
16ra, Ja! r5ir
Bill Monk
Chanhas senBox 147
Chanhassen
Re
Please call if you have any
101)Project 77-6
You have advised me that it is proposed to hold the above specj.alassessment hearing on August 10, rsar. please ue "avis"J ti.rut ,r,a.,the law (M.s. 429-06r) pubrication and mailing or in"-""iiJL or puurichearing must occur not less than tvro ,."r" prior to ttre-rreiring.
Therefore, the notice must be published in theon JuIy 22, l91]- and mailed to affected propertJuIy 23, 1981. The notice should be deliveredJuly 17th in order to ensure publication on Jul"
Carver Count HeraIdy owners not ater thto the Herald bv Fridy z lnd.
an
ay,
!{e have attached herewith a.copy of the form of Notice of publicHearing on Assessments.- this i-orm siroura be used as it contains therequired
_ s tltylory language. Ive have aiso attacnea a copy--of }4innesotaStatute S429.061 on which-we have underiined certai., ,"i!,r.r,trequirements.
questions.
Very truly yours,
RUSSELL H.
Chanhassen
LARSON
City Attorney
RHL : ner
\.,' cc: Don Ashworth
RECEIVED
JUL I 6 t98l
_EITY
OF OHANHASSEI{
Dear Bill:
cARVIR
NOT I CE OF PUBLIC IIEAR Irr-G ON
NOTICE IS IIE RIJBY GIViJIJ,Ilinnesota, wi Il- meeL on
that thc City Council of the City of Chanhassen,
CITY OF CIIANIINSSI]N
AND IILNNLPlN CC)UIi1'1IiS,I'1 I I,lNDSOTA
ASS ES SI"lENTS
taclock P. M, atin said Cit1z,objections, i
toh ear. cons j-dcr and pass upon all w r1 tten or oral
thef any, to propo s e<l asscssnicn ts in respect of
tlr e cost, of rvhich to tal Icd
The proposed assessment roll is norv on file and open to publicinspection by arl persons intereste(l; in the offiie of tie CityThe entire amount assessed against aiy parcel of land wiII be punless prepaid, in _ equal annual. principal :,nstaiiments:il=.:^:l such insraIIEEiEE-to be colrccritte "i^tr., eu".iii-Lu*u"Lne year re . The first install.ment wiII be pafable with inat the ra t.e-6E-
--t
per annum on tt:e entire assessment fdate of the res6Tu-ElEi-JEvying said assessments to December 3r,and each subsequent instalimeit wilL bc payable with one year,sinterest at such rate on aII unpaicl instilime_nt", "*".pt
'tf,.t ninterest wiLl be charged if the entj-re assessment as to any parpaid at the office of the City Treasurer within 30 days irl* tf.,of adoption of the assessment ro1I. provj-ded, f.ore""i, [i,it tnCouncil reserves the right to perio<licaIIy adjust Uy ,.="iutiont?i:."f interest payable -on unpaid instalimeni= of ip.ci.ii-"r."wiEhin the limits imposed by law.
CIerk.
ayable,
, the
d ur ingterest
rom Lhe
I9
ocel ise datee City
the
s,sments
The general nature of the
was as folLows:
of said improvement
J.ying withii-, tnu portiorr"Iot and bLock or name
The area proposed to be assessed for tc costincludes all Lots, pieces or parcels of Iandof-the City described either i:y subdivision,and tax identification number, as follows:
Notice j.s also given that an owner of assessed property may appealan assessment to the District court. pursuant to ttinnesota 3tut.rt.",Sec. 429,081, by serving.noticc of appeaf upon th; M;yor-oi CityClcrk.of Chanhassen within t.hirty tJbi-aoy, after the adoption of theassessmenr and f iling such notici wirn rirl Di;a;i.r."a.ill",ii.r..,rn t"r,(101 6o"- after servicc upon. tn. U.y", or City C1erk; provided,!?*:"or: that no.appeal miy Ue t"X"i,-ou to rc amount of any assess_ment unless a wrirten objeltion signcd uy tr-ru
-
o ii!" a.a"irlp", ry owneris filed with rhe City-.-lerk prioi to t1.,. asscssment hearing orpresentedtothepresidingofficcratthe}rcaring
I?a:": is furrher given to SENIOR CITIZENS thstatutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.I95, the Ci9i:.1:!i"1, sranr hardsrrip speciii-oIlo"=^ont
:i:?]or"-homestead property owners sixcy_fiveoldgl. Application for defcrred paymcnt of sshall be made on forms prescribcd u!. iiic counavailable at the City H;11 ana wnicil mu=t teClerk not later than
at pursuant to Minnesotaty may, at itspayment deferrals to(651
-
ys.r. of age orpectal assessnlentsty Auditor which arefiled with the Citv, 19
Ioti:e. is further given- that the option to clcfer the payment ofspeciar assessments sharr terminat. onJ aI1 amounts .i.irruiutoa pr,_r=appricable interest sharr becom. auo-upon the occurre";; ;; any ofthe forrowing events: a) ttre deaih oi-rh" ornur; p;;;r;.;-rhat rhespouse is other$rise not eligible for the benefits hereunder; b) tesale' transfer or subdivisi6n of ah; fioputty or any part ti)creof ;c) if rhe propertv should. ror inv-."u!ln-:.o"i it" r.,6*!"i.a; sratus;or d) if for lnv ieason the taxiig a"tf,ority deferring the paymentssharr derermine rhat there wourd 6"-""-'i.,uto'=hi;-a;-;;;rir! i^*uai.reor partial payment.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Dated:City cl-erk
Publish in Carver Count Herald on
SKAAR AND MCCULLOUGH
.\1 r''r,.\) t\ \r l.\s
s aNr Ir Acr \{r\
\lr\\r \r"'r.r: \lr\\r s!'t \ :-,r,,r
H^RVE Y E SXA^'T
M^FK C MCCTJLLOUGH
Timothy D. FuIler, Esq.
I"IORRIS & HARVEY, P.A.
3250 irlesc 66rh Street, Suire 301Minneapolis, MI'l 55435
Also_, yot informed me thaE yourfor her deposirion this Friiiay,
Dear Mr. Fuller:
This is Eo confirm ourTerm moEion in the above entilled matte3:30 p.m. on Jul 29, t981 , at the Carv
conEinuance of the Spec ia1r from 1I:00 on 7/L4/BL toer County Courthouse.
rctzt 313-l5ll
'I ()DArE JuIy 14,
suarrcr l6ygggng
I9 B1
v. Bloomberg, eE
client,
July 17,aC Mr.
Yours
Jean Lovetang, would be
Barry ' s office,present
2:00 p.m
very Eruly,
Harvey E. SkaarHES: dcc: Joseph Thompson, Esq.
Thomas G. Barry, Jr. ,Dennis Moriarty, Esq.
SEephan A. PezaIIa, EsJohn Rice, Esq . [ 79- 1
bcc: l/Ci.ty of Chanhassen
t
E
q
4
3434-06)
sq.
091
RECEIVED
JUL 1 6 1961
CITY OF CHANHASSEI'I
Jr,,t€ 19e 1 cltY 0F CHA\ttSSE{suxY!E.Y rtulcEr .rr0tr -t EvENUS
COLLECTEO
Tq iS x0tll x
COLLECI:9
IO-OA'E
195'17'..7s
5r.. 6 t 25\ t3f 0. E2
9r33t.42 L5 .319.56
2. tc
Jt),i:. 1?rt( 90.0! PERcEtlr 0F Y-a, irrlcEtl )
FE CEnl
'O.DIIE
P:OCEXI
L!SI Y?
UNI0LL:-CtF,
1t!-A.tC:
1Ci G€ NSPAL FUtl0
'.8! (fcc ofF€RqEc 0€BT
BUO6EIEO
lEVENUE
607.2q6.00
5J.32
201
'ISE,1S€
rqEE FUN0 5r,100.003.t?
2C2 FECFiaL c€VEllU: sHARlxG _ _42r?0O.OO2''|9
(Ct sEflEC ExcANSI0N 0 t r1,800.00
2. L0
t t? HAIE: E XEAtSI0i t{0 t
. ?.25\. \3 -.d0
.lr.rc00.(,0.96
!1957.55 ...69
. 11i3Ct.00.f5
11r156.C6
2.
'.!
rr .15 rr, 3l
.78
5.2?c.q91.t5 5,9r . !r
!, ri r3.9r.
!.15
lE,^ft.67
1.az
26.Cl tcifq5.6t
1 . Li '|
52.56 a.36
_51.07 1215"1.8!
l.2r
2s. c 6.1;2,8''1.63
r.4. 5 i ft./s" {6.2.5.6t
."1. 0a
_ Jl.51
e6. c3
- - ____ 26.\\
3f.39
//. f7
/3.2 /
5'i2rE69.t l
56.2r
)
)
-)!!2.67 _.11
,Ji.0.6 9 7/.f?
9
1
5i3(0.16
.q3
r.0 r.ctYy xrLL ) FrRx _8oI_cs __, _ l?r32!.00
2. 13
13r l?:.32\.65
'.[5 CI]Y HALL SCllCS 1q5'000.00
9.5 8
..t 5. Lt \. ??
75 .95
'(lC UIILITY FUND - _372i230.002\t59
,.9 i 13 8. 17
3. 71
r.2 r 13 6. 37
7.9!
r. ?.95 3. 9I
17. 65
,,6 5 ,94 r. , 35
J r.. a1
TCTrL 0Pit A lIr6 FUNSS . _ 1'51 3!990.00 2d3!018.i.J 531,699.8r+.Lz /J.B o 9r?,?c)0.r6
.)
J
)
)
)
!
I i-- -l---l
J
llltlr:liIrtt
CITY SUHIARY
OPERA TING FUICS
1? ,93 5. 3:!
2.4r
-1.7.'!.1L
I .21
-r
t
JUN! !961
CIIY SUxh
0tEeAr JxG Fr,tiEs
8Y RiVINUF SCUTCE
Gafl€o.a L P!,0PEF'Y TAXaS
SEECIAL ASSESI.IENIS
LI C alls:S
o:nnIrS
rINES . FOFF€IIS
iNT.AGCVaENqENIAL F.Ev.
CUFREN I SEPVIC'5
OT H:P FEVS\UE
NCN-FEVSNUF
CIIY 0F CHANHaSSS\SUBHlRY BU0GTT PEPORT .RevEI{UE
EUOGETEO
REVENUE
c0LLEcttc
THIS I{ONI II
coLL:ct€c
IO.DATE
6t+1'16t.00
\?.35 2A 2. Ll \.79
? L.t z
1,523.35
.5tr
t 1592 , \5.3'
29r01!.00
1.92
2t\\4,25
' 06
t9r?55.0i
J.6Z
55.99 0.003.'0 19.J97.28
3. 55
r5r60c.00
1.03
1r5r.5. 00 6 t29 9.9n
1.5s
305r160.00
?0.16
62r95r-1.2?
11. 8rr
!7 6,08 6.00
2 \,91 5q,07J.5r
19. 10
17 1' 139. 8 r.
32.19
72,r.5C.00
\,79 5 .59 ) .56r.sz-?5 t 2t) L,35
10,500.00
.69
(93.00
.tf t 0 r 132.97
1, 91
JUn: t9 l lI 50.00 P€iCENr CF Y:i' :t.It. r,
PEiCgNI
TC-eArE
eaFc:xIL!St Ya
UN:CL'.:CTEO']!-arlcE
)
)
.)
6'000.00.t0
J!.3rr
26.5e
65. r7
:!1. . 6 {.
5 ?,95
24.53
\5. ?t
-11. .7 !
96.5 r.
.rr.6 y'
-s-l7s-
/a4,7 A
Jy'r7
s'f.t 7
t".60
/3.s-d
,to6 ,6 /
r.27rr.11.1'
t r ,51
\).1t.55
9i75B.O)
.91
3e t5 .oZ .7 2!. 71
7.,rc!.t:
2.2)2l,a,fa
?q .6E
-7.2'.!.6i
r.. il
367.!r
)
)
)
)
-)
2 et 9'.0.15
.. I 0 I A L S 1r513r 99 0.00 ?3 3r 0 8E.lr l 511 r 69 9. E'.39.L2 /z.aO 9t2,2-r0.16
l. I I I
-------;-.-I I l t,
)
I
5,507.95- r.9l _
9! 736.0 0
3. 5i.
2r.3 r 760.03
4 0.2!
tttr
Ju[E 19rtt
FuNo 101, GgNEP A L FUNo
G€ \E6! L Fr 0o5pTY rAXaS
J",I CUPF iNI FROFEAIY IAX:!OIl CELINOUENI P'OPE.TI. TAX
3C2O F€IIALII!S } IHfEPESI
cllv 0F clrariHAsssl
Et,OGE T€O
RLiVENUE
COLLECIEO
TH!S HOTIT H
q32i 66 !,00
.00
Og'IIL SUCGET FEPORI .E€V€IUE
COLL E
'1ENTO.OAT€
1?9i 6r.9. !7 - t!7rqq8.69
JUfE 19 61( t0.0C PE TCFrrr 0F yir ar,-loFnl
PE. CL '
PEl:CiIJY
I O.CA 1E LASI YP
UXC0LL:Cl:t
.3 AL AXCE
)
q!3r860.0!
12!00c.00
12r000.00
129r Ct 9.37
. r 0!
.cc
135rC60.82
2;86t.e7
.09
33. C :.
23.9C
27 3 tf71.L)9.1-rt.9tt?.0i!.0^
Js-.6?
/ea zt1c4
sr>ay:11. az
56 .5 r.
36. 07
)
)
J
)
J
J
J
)
J
)
)
)
J
J
J
)
J
:O1AL 6EXEIAL FFOPEEIY IAX€S 2rq.Cr.,,.1!
0'l
srFc:AL AS39SHEITS3t3O CURFsNI
T0r!L LI c€ 'tS: S
tCrlL pEPriIS
2?0.00
2t 6.0Ctr 60 0.00
65 [.00
2q' 65 0.00
900.00q50.00
.00
109,?5
.00
2,r1C.00
.0n
.00
r25.0i
1 , ?C 8.5'1
e? 2.01
15 t997 ,9',t
9t0'0-.:19c.0r
5.0,
1C3.3S
1!0.0[
t 2.?2
.00
?arrtc.c0
52r0i0.00
.0-^
.00 .00
?|t t \.2t 19,105.01
5r39r.95 19r 55 7.26
25.0c /J'e. aA
".
L2
,/. rs'2'r
r''jl
2?
It
a
,
!
7
rr9.r,0:
31.51
/o5.7y' 1.6:5.01
?al
?a,L-t.?7
?iPHIIS
JJ':1 BU!LOI NGIta6 2LUhSl NCt3CI TR:ITCHI NG
33c8 GUN
3 ! l1 SI6rr3320 SiAPL€
'r5r0r0.005!58C.00
?,080.00'' 90.00
:.00.r0
15 C. 00
r.,9!7.9'
e90.0c,0.00
.00
10.00
9!.00
16r351.7$
1,5c9.!:
53 0. !a
60.54
37 .a'2f.\4
26.9C6.6t
6t.90
66.6f
3?,L6
.g,oa
Ja.c/ JJrTr:.zi
I _?
I
.: C IAL SPiCIAL !SSES}IENTS
LIC.N5:S
3?C3 C0G xE NiL320r. CI6rrET:gtA:9 006 cR CAT3??3 3.2 0Fr !N, or{ SALg1226 LIOUOq CN AiIO OFF SALE
32 27 CLU'r AN0 SUN0AY
3 2lr. PUggiSH
trrtlltt tltl I I I I I l,
I
JU'r! 19 r I
ruN0 lc1 GENEqTL ru[0
clIY cF cRA xrssEI
8U]G€TIO
REV€NUE
15,6q0.00
?5C,?80.00
0ErlIL ?UDGit F:; ORI -. gvENUE
( r0.0!. rE?caN' oF
JUXY:I
t9c1
ltr:i:':t
P:.C!Nl P:FCq I
IO-OAT: LAS' Yq
uhatLL ac':!
SILAN'E
FInSS I FCFF:i-Sll.!l IRAFFIC r
3r.0 3 PAP(JN6
3 r. !'r. CO G
3r.C I 0IHgr
13,C!'C.00
It20C.0!
1r490.00
.00
1r36r.0'
.0,
tr2.00.0!
CrlC. vl0Ll II CI
t0taL FItiiS . F01F'ITS
:I5]! GFAHTS, CIXEF
rcraL IxrF a60v€F NxrHTnL R€v.
cu.'1Eh I sl ovIcEs
36!r SALa 0F C0CUx:xrS3esZ uSE I vTaIANCE PLR;riTS
35 !.. 'SSiS.
P0LL SEARCHES36rJ HISC.36e2 FIqa C!LLS
36E9 HJSC, FUELIC S{FT;Yl6l2 cnqx auF. F€as, 0AILY1633 oAt( ACi. FEESr YaAF.LY
'lr) 3 5 xI SC.3636 5€LF-SUtF0?ti[G tq06i.Ar{S
36.!9 XISC PUBL IC r0e(S
CoLLECTE0
rSIS ttotrt H
COL:E CT iD
T0-caTa
7 r606.0:
615 . 15
36.75
1, 5q5. 0 0 6 r25 9.94
3 r. .619. 0 |l.'tr.5.00
.00
50,00t.00
,.r649.01,-
.03
sa.9!
r.3. 9I.
o-2,s"3
"'a-b
i,3r!.0i
tr2cJ,0:7?\.a,,..7i1o.
)
5?.95 r-3.L7 7.rr.0,1.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
J
J
I
)JNTp AG0v:Ft{r'rc-NItL F!Y.
35Ct L0CrL CCViRN. AIC
39 e 2 xsn NAI [r. . CoISIe.l:09 0txl9 sH!.aE IAX r sIATE35T.l GRAIIISI STATE
35 -10 GqAri:S' FEIETAL
15 31 tE0. eEVaHU: STIFING
199i950.0C
6rA00.00
1C,500.00
13,000.0t
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0l!
.00
.04
9, 736. C 0
.74
1ra0c.e:
' lf
9r735.0t
9'23
?1.71 2q.o@ 1q:.ii..!:
17. Jl
65 .36
a s-.da
72.a /
,t,o {
th5rr6l.rl:2r!5r.01
14,5:1.:.11re:C.!'
9r 716.01C!
.0:
r.5. 9I
50.0!
66. J _r
70. ?3
99.C0
150.00
?35.0 0
4q.22
.00
lrlit!.!0
912,0n
.03
1t 7. 9a
30 c. 0c
995. r!35t.12
.0!
66.0:1,i62.0!
1i 126.0?
. 0'l
1i899.0:
L 2. t)l
2l2 .1'
1.J.n'
a,<rra.0-r
97r..c:
!5. L7
51. 3!
+2... 1)
2.r.4
7/. o 3 1rr:1 .t)
.0i
I I I I lll II
..=t'_-
t -
ccc.00
60r.00
1r5C0.00
500.00
2r0.00
.00
7,000.00
2r00c.00
100.c0
1r50t.00
500.09
,)
9.735.00.
.0!r
.00
16'30!.00
lr r 65 0.00
.00
,00
0EtaIL 8U0GEr FEP0qT -REvE UE JU ri:- l9 ! t
cF Y:! :rr!'t!ttI 50.00 Pi'CStl-,
C UFqE}lT 5€RVICES3661 HA Iep CUSTOxEqS3€6r. SaLE OF nETE:.s .
,014L CUcF 5fi I SERVICiS
paq
EUOGETEO
REVENUE
coLLEc?!0 -
THIS IIONIH
COLLECI EO
r0-0Ar€
?3.54
1? 0. ci
P€I:CgNT
l0 -0lt E
PipcErT
LASI Yi
U li: JLr- lC trD
nl-ArjC:
23.5:C.
l2a. !'cF
Jt.06 .53. o y'1Jr29t.rl
42.94 /rL.b6
.?4,36
eIH9P iEV! lU5
38OT INI. EAFNI116S
:rC i3 9UILnI N6 REirlALl
3
J
Aa8
616
€20
INS. RECC V'i IES I R.iH.
SU i.'I I REIAIN!RxIsc.
3C,000.00
.00
.00
35 0.00
380.ll0
tr68?. q6
.0J
.0c.0,.0,
1 2 .869.61
.01
' 0i
'0!79 .61
TCTAL OT H!E qE vEIIUE
xox-F.EvEtiut:
l9E3,igFUrrCS r&EI'l8U(SEtElilS
TOIAL NON.:g V: }1UE
r.i!07.72 6 r 0r.1.57
r2,9\5 .21
1,011.97
1,011.C7
17rl!'.39
.0:lt').f:
22\,t '_--_ 25. ?1 ,
t'2.2\1'66?.r.6
?12.0t
Jo 5.9 ? 17r74.,79
t.c1r,r7cP
1ta1L.?7C,2t2. t0
rOI !L l()T GEIIEqAL FUsO
607,2r.0.00 L55tL7t,.t5 25\r37 0.62 !1.51 Jtr.3 f 5i2rra?.i.
)
J
)
J
)
J
J
)
)
)
J
)
J
J
J
J-
I I tt I lll III
JUNE 1981 ClrY OF cHAil)rlSSSr,t
FUXo- !0t GENEFAL fuit0._ -_
t
21.50
120.00__
JUft! !9rI
8Y IYFE OF EXFENO]'UEE
.Er' S C\ AL SF\VICES
HITEE I ALS } SUFDL:ES
CON'FA CTUA L 5EFVICES
CITITAL OUTL^Y
r€9r s ERvI cn
qi5c. 0I5eu?5r- rr!Nrs
CIIt OF CHAIINASSiN SUHIIARY nU:6 E t t:P041 -gxra OIIUF:S
L x i,END: O
Y!:!f-Tc-3! Ia
.-, - PETCE r{t
:ICUlrSRAICES IC-0A7€
FiCC::rT
L! ST Y"
un::i cue e:e s lr!iaNcE
E XPiNDEO
IHl S I{CN'H
537.r.9C.00
31.93
q 2' 16r.0 323.\2 ?3 2,1r. 6. 3tr
11r.rl.3C'00
6.80
l0'7ca.9rt.9q 5!r717.81
597,05 !. [0
35.r.6
10qrr9'r.0!
,6.25 18 9.:117 , 1a
2A't+5
36ia5C.00 5r 651.0 6
- trlrr
18 r5C 3.91
2.9,
t97r080.r0tt.t1 .00 125 r38 !. J1
t 7. 1.8
196 r 62 0.00
11.00
16r561.1C
9.2 7
1e 1 ,12 4, 75
I r.. 11
)
I
C ITY SUIIHARY
CFEEA II N(. F U I\OS
tJ.19 /a.?/
3-7,r.q.f2
::5r-r'.1.66r1.6',)
t I r? 12.79
31.7 r y'a,73 s07r722.61r?.!1
? J r: 76. r.9
2 .11
63.6? /3e./3 -rra"6.al
i:rr.ri!?5
1C.C1
\7.59 /Z 7J,
t0.s1 53./b
1.66 3.56 0.00 ll0rg7li.16 7 L7 rztl+.9C L2.6,' ,-.f .6 o5.- i r {5 r 1'
)
J
)
,)
)
.J
J
J
)
J
J
)
J
J
I I I ttt tltt I llll
J.J' l3a1( 50.0C 7E:CiNi 0F Y:a- gx:I, Elt
SuCGSr !0
EXEENOITURES
)
J
)
)
JUIIE 1961 CI lY 0F CHANHaSS5r{
FUNO .1OI GEI{EFA( FU}iO
SUllxARY BUcGET REPOq' .EXOENOITURES JUrri
t 50.0,1 FE?cEr:r 0F ta1;:-tr-I?!1,
F! rcEIr pqpcrN IIO.OtIE LASI YC
UN.']C
- ! ric :
1,-r!r7.t(cq
.2t
9UOGETEC
E IPE }'OI
'
UP€S
E XFSR OE ]
tH IS tlotlfH !rPEr{oE0
!EAF-tC-0n ra
00r
!12 .r0xIxisTPrroFs 0FFIcE
!1J FI iiAXCi
! 1r. LE6,L
1T7 CIIY HALL
T 13 ELqC T I CNS
l2r
L22 FIPE o,i€vEN'I0tl + l0ll
L2\ CIVIL CEfEN:E
l26 !NIXTL C0xIF0L
tJl :N6IirEgcJ{6
132 SI.ETTPIIIITENANC:-
1J7 CI IY 6AFAG!
Ir.1 CoHP. SekV. Cox l5S10N
l\2 c0H . 5Ecv. A0rIN.
1r.3 PAR ( XII NTEIlANCE
25t25A.08
2 '6t
1r81J.01t.?6 9r702.1-1
? .53
?2.900.00
?.7 2
er69C,1rt
6.0t
3Et255.2?
9.95
- 30,q0!.00
1.22
3,791.r'
2.63
12,6? 6.6i
16r00c.00
1. 91
1r 8l.5.6I 12.7e J,13
3.33
39,65C,C0t .22
2t669.fa,
1.05
9 'r.l
g. r.62.\'
3. 00 c.00
.32
.00 .00
.0'l
.0a
1,Eei.36
1.29
1 .35 7. 1i
1.16
36. r.2
52.\6
r.1r5rr
7L.42
23.6 r.
r cr.
,0.c2
25,32
{r5 . .6
11.f ?
5r.77
//37
5/"s'o
5a././
./ai2
r'r 73
)2. "2
37e/
Itr€r.r..Z!6.rr
t7,77r.1:
5r216.87
.qJ
lirrli.l"
?.9,]3.3!
_r1r6;t.5q
,:l19:8.8'
2!rr.qt.l,:
L.j7
23r7!1.3..
L.23
l:6.3ir.9?
11r.1q.91
t6it 15,6r.
J
J
)
J
163.38C.00tl .29
61,56F.10
56.67
61.t16. r.1
21.2t
a2! 990.0!
8.79
3r917.12
2,7 2
21iC11. ?!
5. \7
rSre!e.00
\.?9
Ir55J.r.5
?. \f
r.06.00
. Ct
2 ! r 7r.4.0q
5.41
9r150.00.if 200...l0
.1q
61566.7 ?
L.7L
J6r150.00
!.63
?"15.99
L.?5
12 '
r.l 5. 6?
3.23
105r07C.00
19.69
L?r8,.4.tt
6.92
69i686.18
LE.1r.r
2 3,40 0,00
2.4 g
1r685.48
1. 17
11r88 0.t 23.l9
/?.//"
37.48 L/2../r.
30r 76 C.0 0
3, 26
14r7ar.36
3. E3
,..10c.00
.14
?8.00.cl li l.6l
?3,710.00
2.51
2,030.36
1. !.1
10 r9n6.99
2r 16
r.r. E, ??' 7/
3-.7/
i6.34
:6. 31
12r7tJ.a1
r5,Al!,5i
.t-.g. z,/
36. /764r 35 r.00
6.81
5i855.q1t.07 13 r5J6.t E
1..33
I tl ft I I
111 LEGtSLAT:V!
ExC ux ERAri C aS
L5 t, \7 .9',
r23 0ROrgCr IOI S EP VI c!S"
135 STC. LIGHT!I.JG } SIGNALS
c:1.0:
.,:l
3-/.?s' 2r5aJ.2!
.!6
I l, t I I I li
- -169 -.EcrE IirT[-r,i-6CETd3- - - - -ie.T6I;C0- - - - - 6U t?i- - - - Ii'J-fl;-I6- - - -2. 01 .56 1.1q
tr.6 S:LF SUPFOeT; NG F,{OGl Alts 4. 00 0.00
.la?
Jtt..C0,2\
151 PLAlitrI xG C0HfirSSI0{2,96 0. o !
.31
792 PLA NI.II I/ G ACTlINISIRAT:ON 61.61 0.00
G.32
t5, HousIr'lc . ?€0€v. aulH..00
6,52
156 :C0L0GI CAL C0r{(I5sI0N
L57 COrr FACILJT!'5 COrirrrt ..00
.11
.00
5,(3 6. gi.
1,000.00
.11
21.7 I
.02
2t.fL
. rl1
.t,.02
.0:
.01
-f,. tT - -aZ.-o-7- -l a;-.3! ;3'.- - -
2.6 !
..60 ./ 4, ?,/ !.G66.0:
Z.62 Jf2s7 2.ta?.\z
r.3. 28
t.?!
6.lr
?.17
3 r.6, 0 (.
)
)
.00 77.9 3
.c?
7,90r.si
5.49
26'656.-rr.
6.9r
q; A .2_9
.\7
'OTAL GE NEiAL 9t q. E? 0.0 0 1r.3!9r.2.!3 J8q,069.5a (0.6t .//, 27 56;.ri0..2
lllllllllllllllllll)
.lJxE 1961 CIIY 0F C{ANHISSEI
FuHg !0t G:ilER!L -fvxg .__
sulr!!kf gUIrCEI CEp0qI -ErpEI0I tuR€S Jur: t 9 tl( 50.C9 t€. CaNi CF y:!r :(cJc:tt
sxPEtio:0
YENP. TO- OA T'ENCUXEF.ATTC:S
PE,iC€XT
1o-caIE
F a F:C:lt T Ur{E ttUH [rRE0Lrs, Y:r 3!-AXC€
31,609.51__
2 !. r.9
185'662.91,
45.t5
\2.r 2 /d.s{ 2,.c,itt .t7It.76
9r05(.9q
5. 85
36 r 210. 35
9.t.!
r.3.9?-r'2 72
//-z s-
e/rl
)
I
nY IYPE OF :XliNC:rUqE
CERSCTIAL SERVICES
BUC6ETEO
EXP;NOITURES
E XpeNOE0
IHIS I{ON
'H
ql5 r66C.00
4b.22
c?,rq0.00
6.7 3
r.t3r5|.!.00
\2.?t 99'609.33
69. 26
L5' 1665.99r.1. ! 5
e2r180.00
?.35
)
)
'),..
)
HA'ETIALS } SUFPLIgS
ccliTFtcIut,_ sgPvIcEs
C!CI!AL OUlI-AY
xJsc.:JsEUai€H9rtrs
584.53
.41
-at?.9.e5
t.?i
?c5rr75.it.3."9!9.3 7
Lt .22
.00 .00
.52
1r357.15
l7.a2rr.r1
!. r.l
3;.24 1! r97.15C8
' 21'
9r.r. r 82 0.00 143,9r.?.3J 38r.rC59.58 r.0.55 //.7 7 ,Ba,7a0.\2
)
)
J
I
J
tll lllll
T 0 , r L 5 ..
tttttttt I
)
JU\E l9 6l Cltl 0F CHAllri!SSEN
8u0G E I !0gxP:NOIiU9ES
q xPg 0E0
THIS r{0(l }t
9r.t rOaC.00
52.12
1'.r'9q2.!3
79.qb
57,10C.00
3. 39
?t 169.65L.2'
.0( ,
,00
27i010.00
1.6 0
\ t 532.3f
?,52
t1i30[.00
.67
SUHXAF.Y sUNGEI F EPORT .EX2ENOI'UEES JUll: 13!1( 50.0e cF: cE^i 0r Y!-a' arslttct
q5.69
F.OC'NI
LJ ST vir
56i r7i0. r.3
i6.c!
Piic:It
1O-OAI €
u{ i:rtu,. 9ir :D,i-a.tc;
2f,72 J5.2,/
$./
rl.2?\.,1
t''27
! 3, r.9.2i
1!.11 2\ t 15, ,19
.lJ
CI I Y SUHXARY
OPEiAIING F UNOS IEXDqNo!0
V:A!:.-TO-aati:
3ebr069.58
53. r5
:5rE26.6:
2.21
!NCU BT{Af,C:i
2NZ FEO! F AL F€I/:XUs SHARII{G 43i50C.00
2.5 6
r.ll SEHSr axFlNSI0N tlo 1 t0.000.00
1.76
IO1 GENi;,TL FUiIT,
ecl SISt^SE rREE FuxC
'.c 3 HIiCC DEF!RQt0 09€I
!CI. CITY HALL } FARK 9ONCS
LC5 cItY HALL ECrrCS
7C0 UTIL:lY FUIID
10.75
l)
.c2
.,
)
.)
)
_)
J
)
?.
)
5 rt:4t. ZL
.79
26,t52.3r
3.65
4 6.35 0.08
2.t5
1? 8,4e 6,00
7.53
4 L t5?7 .95
5.79
e6. i2 ?/33
19.6!
56.99
13' e3 ld*-r'
-rr2?.C5
a5.2!9.6t
21\.?rb.31
i!'41
.00
73,180.J6
10.?l
3e5,060.00
23.t z
?9 r\?9.6L
16. 3 rr
17C,8!3.67
e3.01
I r 69 3r 56 0.00 180,C7r.16 717.i1/..91
I I
r.2.6i 4L. f b 956, !..5.1:
I I I I III
!0 2 HArE. ExFANSICI NC 1
)
.00
rCTAL ODgqAT IXG FUNOS
l--lIr
I
t
I,
/1ti
fl
I
I
IIo.Q,,N
't
l,lil
;l
t
,l
t
t
I
t-}[
I
.d:
I
I
,
I
\
I
J
\It'I'
)'t
,'t'
I.t{
',t
\
, t)
ft
^
s
\'
\
{
1
.5
\
\I
I
'lri'
I
,t t
It
T
,I
llil
I
T
I \
.t\
A
T
)
\
)I
)
la
I
Iljli
fo
l(r\Jr(+
\
\,t
I
l,
I
II
II
I
(
t0
{'
9:
e9,4
I fA[L
,t'
fi
I
III1
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
-t
l'.
I
r,lt
;:').'
\\)
y3
.-\E,-
t
I
,lI
'l
I
n
I
t\
\
r\
i
\
{
I
,l
\\
!i
:ti
I
I
\
\
/"
\
I
,n
't'I
d'i,
:
l
s.
/