Loading...
05-05-2025 City Council Agenda and PacketA.5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Note: Unless otherwise noted, work sessions are held in the Fountain Conference Room in the lower level of City Hall and are open to the public. If the City Council does not complete the work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda. Public comment is not allowed at the work session. A.1 Santa Vera Development Proposal Discussion A.2 ROW Ordinance Updates A.3 City Council Roundtable A.4 Future Work Session Schedule B.7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance) C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS D.CONSENT AGENDA All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to the council packet for each staff report. D.1 Approve City Council Meeting Minutes dated April 14, 2025 D.2 Approve City Council Work Session Minutes dated April 14, 2025 D.3 Receive Environmental Commission Minutes dated March 12, 2025 D.4 Approve Claims Paid dated April 28, 2025 D.5 Arbor Day Proclamation AGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, MAY 5, 2025 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD 1 D.6 Award contract for the Pleasant View Road Improvements Planning Study D.7 Approve the Annual Renewal of Laserfiche Software Subscription Municipality Site license. D.8 Award Contract: Commissioning Services for City Hall/Senior Center (Civic Campus project) D.9 Remove No-Parking designation on Kiowa, Iroquois, and Huron Avenues D.10 Fire Station Rooftop HVAC Replacement D.11 Resolution 2025-XX: Call for the Assessment Hearing for the 2025 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 25-01 D.12 Resolution 2025-XX; Revisions to Assessment Policy D.13 Resolution 2025-XX: Approve Application of Hackamore Brewing Company to Dispense Intoxicating Liquor off premises in Lake Ann Park during the 2025 Chanhassen Summer Concert Series D.14 Approve Resolution Rescinding Resolution No. 2025-24 Adopted on March 24, 2025; and Approving the Authorization for the Issuance and Sale of an Amount Not to Exceed $13,185,000 General Obligation Temporary Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2025A. D.15 Resolution 2025-XX: Authorize Vegetation Management Services Contract for 2025 E.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda). F.FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE G.PUBLIC HEARINGS G.1 Resolution 2025-XX: Crimson Bay Rd Improvements Assessment Hearing & Award of Construction Contract H.GENERAL BUSINESS H.1 Consider Preliminary Plat, Site Plan, Rezoning, and Land Disturbance and Tree Removal Contract for Pioneer Ridge Development (Planning Case 25-01) H.2 Approve Purchase Agreement and Gift Agreement to acquire property for Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center I.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS I.1 Report on City Manager's Performance Review J.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS K.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION 2 L.ADJOURNMENT GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations. Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required to complete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available at https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior to the meeting. A total of thirty minutes is alloted for Visitor Presentations. Priority is given to Chanhassen residents. An additional thirty minutes may be provided after General Business items are complete at the discretion of the City Council. Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City Council. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson that can summarize the issue. Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. Comments may also be emailed to the City Council at council@chanhassenmn.gov. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be directed to the City Manager. Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Tequila Butcher, 590 West 79th Street in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the public are welcome. 3 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item Santa Vera Development Proposal Discussion File No.Item No: A.1 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Eric Maass, Community Development Director Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION No action; discussion only Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY As the city has an active land use application before it, the City Council shall not pre-judge the application, but is asked to provide feedback on the discussion areas below. The City Council previously reviewed this proposed development during its work session on February 10. The meeting minutes from that discussion are included below under the "Background" section of this case. Since the City Council last provided feedback on this proposed development the Developer has held a neighborhood meeting to get feedback from residents and has also submitted a formal land use application to the city requesting to amend their Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning designation and for site plan approval for a proposed 59 unit apartment building. The specific request includes amending the underlying zoning district from R-12 to R-16, as well as a 25% density bonus based on an R-16 density designation. The units resulting from the 25% density bonus are proposed to be affordable, but a specific Area Median Income (AMI) threshold for 4 affordability has not been indicated. Based on the neighborhood meeting, city staff are aware of the following general concerns: 1. Understanding of traffic generation 2. Existing on-street parking on Santa Vera Drive from residents utilizing the park/baseball fields 3. Stormwater solutions 4. Tree removals 5. Pet waste 6. A lack of sidewalk on the north side of the property 7. Building height 8. Safety of proposed stormwater ponds in proximity to the school Some in attendance at the open house were supportive of the proposed project and provided the following comments: 1. Happy to hear that units would remain affordable 2. The area is currently an eyesore, and this would be an improvement 3. Concern that neighbors will complain about progress Based upon staff's initial review of the proposal, the city has discretion over the following project elements: 1. Amending the PUD underlying zoning designation from R-12 to R-16. The property is guided as High Density Residential, allowing up to 16 units per acre density. One aspect when considering an application for rezoning is whether or not the proposed rezoning is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as well as if the proposed zoning is compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. The immediately surrounding properties are zoned as follows: North: PUD-R with RSF underlying. South: Office/Institutional (Chanhassen Elementary) East: PUD-R with RSF underlying West: Office/Institutional (Park/Chanhassen Elementary) In addition to immediately adjacent properties, the proposed development site is within walking distance (1/4 mile) to the city's downtown area which features dining. shopping, and employment opportunities. The site is also immediately adjacent to the Chanhassen Elementary School, giving proximity to school, childcare, and employment and the Chanhassen Civic Campus which features many public amenities. 2. A requested Density Bonus of 25%, resulting in an additional 15 units based on an R-16 zoning designation. The city may support this request based on Section 1.7.2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan which lists "The city will continue to encourage the development of affordable housing; the City may increase the permitted net density of a project by 25 percent. The "bonus" units must meet affordable housing criteria as defined by the city. Developers shall be required to enter into an agreement ensuring the affordability of the units." 3. While an application has not been submitted requesting Tax Increment Financing (TIF) assistance, the Property Owner/Developer is actively pursuing funding sources to support the project and maintain affordability within the property, including the existing 18-unit building. 5 3a. Under what conditions would the Council support housing TIF as part of this project? TIF would likely require the affordable units to be affordable at the 60% AMI threshold. 3b. Would the Council be interested in using its Local Affordable Housing Aid (LAHA) allocation towards this project? For 2024, the City of Chanhassen has been certified to receive $126,855.46 in state funding to support affordable housing within the city. 3c. The city was remitted approximately $300,000 in Livable Community Demonstration Account (LCDA) funding from the Metropolitan Council when a previously affordable project was sold, resulting in the public assistance being required to be returned to the city. The $300,000 is required to be in the form of a no-interest loan, repayable to the city after 15 years in a single balloon payment. The city can reinvest that returned LCDA money into a new development project if it meets affordability requirements. To utilize this funding, the affordable units must be at least 60% Area Median Income (AMI). City staff and property owners/developers are seeking feedback from the City Council on the above questions. BACKGROUND February 10 City Council work session meeting minutes excerpt Eric Maass, Community Development Director, introduced Josh McKinney, The Measured Group, and Ryan Sailer, Headwaters Development to discuss the possibility of constructing a second building on an adjacent property located between the current Santa Vera Apartment building and the Chanhassen Elementary School. Prior to preparing more detailed architectural and engineered drawings for the project, the ownership group requested the opportunity to present an initial concept to the City Council to gain more insights into the City Council's thoughts and ideas as it relates to the development of the site, especially as it relates to the nearby civic campus project and City Council's vision for downtown. Mr. Sailer presented new renderings, ideas, and exterior concepts to the council. The site is 3.85 acres and the current zoning designation for the property would allow for up to 62 housing units by right (assuming an R-16 underlying zoning designation). In the city’s 2040 Comprehensive plan, there is a provision to allow a 25% density bonus for sites that incorporate affordable housing. The proposed plan by Mr. McKinney and Mr. Sailer would build 59 multifamily units that would be in addition to the existing 18 multifamily units. The entrance to the future apartment building will be located on Santa Vera Drive, helping to reduce traffic congestion on Laredo during the busy morning drop-off and pick-up times at the nearby elementary school. The proposed apartment building would also feature a shared amenity space with the existing apartment buildings, offering outdoor recreation areas, grill stations, and an outdoor dining area. Many council members said they appreciated the improvements made to this concept plan since the ownership group last presented a potential development concept to the city. They also expressed their preference that the residents of the current 18 multifamily units not be displaced and that the affordability housing be seamlessly integrated into the design of the new proposed building. Some council members noted that the reduced number of housing types from the previous plan was a positive 6 change while others emphasized the importance of architectural sensitivity to ensure the building complements the surrounding neighborhood. They also anticipated hearing from Santa Vera Drive residents regarding the shift in traffic flow and stressed the need to consider safety concerns related to turning onto Kerber. Additionally, they highlighted the role of landscaping in creating a smooth transition between the new development and the nearby single-family homes. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION No recommendation, discussion only. ATTACHMENTS Architectural plans and building elevations Civil Plan Set Traffic Study 7 1BUILDING ENTRANCE2GARAGE ENTRANCE3COMMUNITY PATIO4STORMWATER RETENTIONSITE PLAN KEYEXISTING APARTMENTS (18)EXISTING GARAGESAPARTMENT BUILDING3 STORIES59 UNITS1234SANTA VERA DRIVELAREDO DRIVESARATOGA DRIVECITY CENTERPARKCHANHASSENELEMENTARYDEL RIO DRIVE1" = 80'-0"1SD Site PlanN0kaas wilson architects80'160'4/1/2025 1:05:27 PMSanta Vera ApartmentsCOVER/SITE PLAN2.0Santa Vera ApartmentsPARKINGLevel Type CountLevel -1 Parking -Garage63Level 1 Parking -Surface71134UNIT MIX - GROSS AREAName CountUnit GrossAreaTotal Area %Main Floor1BRUnit 1-1 18 720 ft² 12,958 ft² 31%18 12,958 ft² 31%2BRUnit 2-1 26 1,051 ft² 27,333 ft² 44%Unit 2-4 3 1,182 ft² 3,546 ft² 5%29 30,878 ft² 49%3BRUnit 3-3 12 1,320 ft² 15,841 ft² 20%12 15,841 ft² 20%Grand total 59 59,677 ft² 100%GROSS AREA - TOTALLevel AreaLevel 3 24,009 ft²Level 2 24,009 ft²Level 1 24,009 ft²Level -1 24,387 ft²Grand total 96,414 ft² 8 22,997 ft²Garage210 ft²StairAHUELECMAINT.BIKESWATER210 ft²Stair6.116.126.136.146.156.16PATIO1,051 ft²Unit 2-11,051 ft²Unit 2-1720 ft²Unit 1-11,051 ft²Unit 2-1720 ft²Unit 1-1276 ft²Stair720 ft²Unit 1-11,051 ft²Unit 2-11,051 ft²Unit 2-11,182 ft²Unit 2-41,320 ft²Unit 3-31,320 ft²Unit 3-31,320 ft²Unit 3-31,320 ft²Unit 3-3720 ft²Lobby / Leasing1,051 ft²Community Room276 ft²Stair1,051 ft²Unit 2-11,051 ft²Unit 2-11,051 ft²Unit 2-1720 ft²Unit 1-1324 ft²Restrooms950 ft²Fitness6.116.126.136.146.156.16Nkaas wilson architects4/1/2025 1:05:29 PMSanta Vera ApartmentsFLOOR PLANS - LEVEL -1 & 13.01" = 40'-0"1Level -11" = 40'-0"2Level 19 1,051 ft²Unit 2-11,051 ft²Unit 2-1720 ft²Unit 1-11,051 ft²Unit 2-1720 ft²Unit 1-1276 ft²Stair720 ft²Unit 1-11,051 ft²Unit 2-11,051 ft²Unit 2-11,182 ft²Unit 2-41,320 ft²Unit 3-31,320 ft²Unit 3-31,320 ft²Unit 3-31,320 ft²Unit 3-3720 ft²Unit 1-11,051 ft²Unit 2-1720 ft²Unit 1-1720 ft²Unit 1-1276 ft²Stair1,051 ft²Unit 2-11,051 ft²Unit 2-11,051 ft²Unit 2-1720 ft²Unit 1-16.116.126.136.146.156.161,051 ft²Unit 2-11,051 ft²Unit 2-1720 ft²Unit 1-11,051 ft²Unit 2-1720 ft²Unit 1-1276 ft²Stair720 ft²Unit 1-11,051 ft²Unit 2-11,051 ft²Unit 2-11,182 ft²Unit 2-41,320 ft²Unit 3-31,320 ft²Unit 3-31,320 ft²Unit 3-31,320 ft²Unit 3-3720 ft²Unit 1-11,051 ft²Unit 2-1720 ft²Unit 1-1720 ft²Unit 1-1276 ft²Stair1,051 ft²Unit 2-11,051 ft²Unit 2-11,051 ft²Unit 2-1720 ft²Unit 1-16.116.126.136.146.156.16Nkaas wilson architects4/1/2025 1:05:31 PMSanta Vera ApartmentsFLOOR PLANS - LEVEL 2 & 33.11" = 40'-0"1Level 21" = 40'-0"2Level 310 kaas wilson architectsSanta Vera ApartmentsEXTERIOR MATERIALS6.0EXTERIOR MATERIALSMaterial MarkDescriptionImage4.1 04-CMU-Splitface-Onyx5.0 05-Aluminum-Balcony-Canopy7.1 07-Siding-Lap6Reveal-Smooth-ArcticWhite7.2 07-Siding-Shake-IronGray7.3 07-Siding-Woodtone-Lap-MountainCedarEXTERIOR MATERIALSMaterial MarkDescriptionImage7.4 07-Siding-Trim-Smooth-ArcticWhite7.5 07-Siding-Trim-Smooth-IronGray7.6 07-Shingles-Charcoal8.0 08-Glazing 11 7.27.67.37.17.27.57.35.07.45.08.0Level 1100'-0"Level 2111'-1 7/8"Level -189'-4"Level 3122'-3 3/4"Truss Brg.131'-4 7/8"4.17.37.27.57.17.37.67.25.07.48.07.67.37.27.27.37.14.15.07.58.0Level 1100'-0"Level 2111'-1 7/8"Level -189'-4"Level 3122'-3 3/4"Truss Brg.131'-4 7/8"7.17.27.67.37.47.27.57.38.05.07.37.57.17.67.47.27.35.08.0Level 1100'-0"Level 2111'-1 7/8"Level -189'-4"Level 3122'-3 3/4"Truss Brg.131'-4 7/8"5.07.27.57.67.17.38.0kaas wilson architectsSanta Vera ApartmentsEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS6.11" = 30'-0"1Elevation 1 - a1" = 30'-0"2Elevation 2 - a1" = 30'-0"3Elevation 3 - a1" = 30'-0"4Elevation 4 - a1" = 30'-0"5Elevation 5 - a1" = 30'-0"6Elevation 6 - a 12 DescriptionRev.DateSANTA VERA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04.04.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-100PMJM04/04/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Santa Vera Apartments\CAD\Sheets\COVER SHEET.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PRELIMINARY PLANSCLIENT:ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:ARCHITECT:SANTA VERA APARTMENTSSHEET INDEX:FOR:VICINITY MAP- NOT TO SCALEC1.0COVER SHEETMEASURE GROUP - PETE MOREAU, PEPO BOX 10WAYZATA, MN 55391PH: 612-440-0934EMAIL: PMOREAU@MEASUREGRP.COMMEASURE GROUP - JOSH MCKINNEY, PLAPO BOX 10WAYZATA, MN 55391PH: 612-440-0934EMAIL: JMCKINNEY@MEASUREGRP.COMHEADWATERS6757 KARMEN AVEALBERTVILLE, MNPH: 612-508-4627EMAIL: RCS@HEADWATERS.BUILDSheet NumberSheet TitleC1.0COVER SHEETC2.1DEMOLITION PLANC3.0SITE PLANC4.0GRADING PLANC5.0UTILITY PLANC6.0PHASE 1 EROSION CONTROLC6.1PHASE 2 EROSION CONTROLC7.0SWPPP NARRATIVE & NOTESC7.1SWPPP NARRATIVEC8.0CIVIL DETAILS - UTILITY DETAILSC8.1CIVIL DETAILS - STORM SEWER DETAILSC8.2CIVIL DETAILS - SITE DETAILSC8.3CIVIL DETAILS - ADA DETAILSC8.4CIVIL DETAILS- ADA DETAILS -CONTINUEDL0.1TREE PRESERVATION PLANL1.0LANDSCAPE PLANL2.0LANDSCAPE DETAILSKAAS WILSON ARCHITECTS - KIM BEHRENS1301 AMERICAN BLVD.BLOOMINTON, MN 55425PH: 612-279-8917EMAIL: KIMB@KAASWILSON.COMSITEW 78TH STLAREDO DRIVEKERBER BLVDSANTA VERA DR13 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||UEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUE UE UE UEUE UE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UEUEUE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UE U E UEGGGGGG G G G G GGGGGGGGGGGG GGGGGGGG606050 5050XXXXX X15" RCP 12" RCP12" RCP 15" PVC15" RCP 24" RCP8" METAL8" PVC8" METAL 8" VCP (PER PLAN)GMEMGM2 STORY FRAME & STUCCO MULTI-UNIT BUILDINGAREA = 9103 SFBLDG #611BLDG #6211 Story Frame & Stucco Garage ComplexArea = 4630 SFCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCANTILEVERW O O D SH E DDeck SIGN "STOP"SIGN "STOP"SIGN "NO PARKING"SARATOGA DRIVELAREDO DRIVE SANTAVERA DRIVE PID: 257620020OWNER: SANTA VERA APARTMENTS LLCPID: 257620010OWNER: CHANHASSEN CITYBITUMINOUS TRAIL BITUMINOUS TRAILBITUMINOUS PARKING LOTSIGN "15MPH"1' BLOCKRET. WALL1' BLOCKRET. WALL1' BLOCKRET. WALL4' WOODRET. WALLUNKNOWN UPSTREAMSANITARY LOCATIONTTCHAIN LINKFENCE1' BLOCKRET. WALLCABXSATELLITE DISHCABX10 1010101010101010 10 10 10 101010ROOF OVERHANGROOF OVERHANG12" RCP21" RCP12" PVC1 8 " P V C 8" PVC (PER PLAN) 8" DIP (PER PLAN)6" DIP (PER PLAN)8" DIP (PER PLAN) 8" PVC (PER PLAN)8" CIP (PER PLAN)8" ABS (PER PLAN)8" ABS (PER PLAN)SAN SEWER (PER GSOC)WATER 6" DIP (PER GSOC & PLAN)50 DELRIODRIVE5021" RCPPORTABLESHEDCABXROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)WOODBENCHESFIRE PITCONCRETE STAIRSW/ HANDRAILWOOD MULCHCONCRETE STAIRSW/ HANDRAILCONCRETESTAIRSROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)GRAVEL LOTNO PARKINGDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONCBRE=990.37INV=987.37 NEINV=987.35 SCBRE=990.62CBRE=990.39INV=990.39 NINV=987.36 WCBRE=988.64INV=982.90 NINV=982.87 SINV=984.64 SWCBRE=987.59INV=981.39 NINV=981.43 SINV=983.02 WCBRE=987.33CBRE=987.77INV=981.35 NINV=981.31 SCBRE=987.74INV=981.12 EINV=981.15 SSTSTMHRE=988.19INV=980.55 WINV=? NE/SESUMP=974.87WEIR=982.93NOTCH=980.59STSTMHRE=988.01STSTMHRE=988.04H YDSSSSMHRE=988.50INV=975.88 WINV=975.85 E#111-20" ash#113-10" spruce#114-28" maple#116-60" basswood, multi-stem#117-30" maple#1-boxelder, 3-stem(8,8,8)#2-13" boxelder#5-poplar, 2-stem(15,13)#3-boxelder, 3-stem(8,8,4)#6-poplar, 4-stem(20,20,20,10)#8-13" poplar#22-poplar, 2-stem(20,16)#23-poplar, 2-stem(24,12)#24-poplar, 2-stem(20,20)#25-poplar, 2-stem(10,6)#110-16" pine#109-30" maple#108-22" maple#107-26" maple#106-14" pine#4-boxelder, 4-stem(10,8,6,5)#12-10" boxelder#112-22 maple#105-22" pine#104-15" pine#102-14" pine#101-15" ash#100-14" ash#98-20" spruce#99-18" maple#103-16" pine#97-15" spruce#96-20" mapleCBRE=994.17INV=991.53 SWINV=990.37 EINV=990.35 WSSSSMHRE=995.24CBRE=995.23INV=990.75 ECBRE=994.83CBRE=995.60HHCBRE=995.72INV=992.08 NEINV=991.88 SWCBRE=996.29INV=992.59 NEINV=992.85 SW#86-50" cottonwood#85-20" cottonwood#84-16" boxelder#83-14" boxelder#81-11" boxelder#82-20" crabapple#87-12" maple#88-ash, 2-stem(8,8)#89-22" maple#90 15" maple#91-16" maple#95-48" maple#94-18" maple#93-15" maple#92-15" maple#131-10" red cedar#133-12" cottonwood#132-10" red cedar#79-15" crabapple#80-12" crabapple#78-boxelder, 4-stem(8,8,6,6)#126-11" cottonwood#125-10" elm#124-10" red cedar#123-14" cottonwood#122-10 cottonwood#121-30" cottonwood#120-18" cottonwood#119-10" cottonwood#118-28" maple#26-poplar, 3-stem(20,14,14)#27-20" poplar#28-24" poplar#29-14" poplar#33-11" poplar#32-20" poplar#30-30" poplar#31-poplar, 2-stem(14,14)#7-18" poplar#9-boxelder, 2-stem(10,8)#10-poplar, 2-stem(42,13)#11-35' spruce#16-20" poplar#14-11" boxelder#13-60" cottonwood#15-11" boxelder#20-10" boxelder#19-26" poplar#18-24" poplar#17-24" poplar#37-10" boxelder#35-10" boxelder#36-10" boxelder#34-10" boxelderHYD TNH996.69CSSSSSMHRE=993.60INV=983.83 NEINV=983.86 SW (ORIFICE, NO PIPE)SSSSMHRE=994.50INV=982.01 SWINV=982.60 NWINV=982.08 E#48-10" boxelder#41-10" boxelder#21-boxelder, 3-stem(10,10,10)#38-10" boxelder#39-36" poplar#40-36" poplar#42-10" boxelder#43-14" boxelder#44-16" boxelder#51-11" boxelder#52-10" boxelder#53-12" boxelder#54-11" boxelder#55-10" ash#45-11" boxelder#47-14" boxelder#46-10" boxelder#49-11" boxelder#50-silver maple, 5-stem(12,12,9,6,4)#59-10" maple#60-silver maple, 4-stem(18,16,10,8)#70-26" silver maple#58-10 ash#56-10" ash#57-10" ash#61-basswood, 4-stem(8,8,6,4)#63-12" crabapple#62-10" boxelder#64-14" ash#65-10" ash#66-10" ash#67-12" ash#74-10" boxelder#73-14" boxelder#68-silver maple, 3-stem(8,5,4)#69-16" silver maple#71-15" maple#72-15" maple#75-12" elm#76-14" ashGM#127-12" cottonwood#128-cottonwood, 2-stem(10,8)#129-10" maple#130-15" cottonwood#77-15' red cedarAREA : 167713.25 SF3.85 ACRES8.00N16°56'27"EL=137.87meas.(137.88plat)R=474.00Δ=16°39'56"meas.(16°40'00"plat)N89°43'33"W 78.00N00°16'27"E 513.79N89°11'28"W 174.96N53°31'23"W 254.72N00°20'03"E 252.00 L=219.05R=171.00Δ=73°23'36"47.222 . 5 46.222 . 1 46.222 . 2 70.516 . 1 23.514 . 2 16.522 . 517.214 . 1 23.516 . 1 68.822 . 2 46.222 . 1 1. 0 24 . 0 31.81. 0 8.61. 0 43.24. 0 24.040 . 6 83.624 . 0 83.04. 0 24.08.631.842.61. 0 48.6 99 0 995 1000 1005 989 991 992993 994 996 997 998 999 1001 1002 1003 1004 990995 989989 9919919919929939949969971000100099799799899899999910011001995991 992993994996995996997995 996997998999990 99 5 991992 9939949961005.91005.51005.71005.81001.61001.41001.61001.81001.01001.61001.0998.4998.8999.1999.2999.1998.9998.7998.7 997.8995.6997.2995.0994.6995.2993.4993.2993.1993.5993.8992 . 6 994.4995.7999.0996.9995.8997.0995.3995.699 5 . 7 9 9 4 . 4 994.2993.2992.3993.7994.8995.3995.8996.1995.8996.0995.6994.7994.8994.4993.5993.7991.8992.5994.8995.9992.2991.4993.8996.7997.8997.4995.3997.9995.7991.1991.7993.9995.2995.5996.2996.6997.2997.41000.71001.61003.21002.41001.9996.5995.7993.5992.7992.5991.1991.2990.8990.4993.1991.3990.2989.2990.8990.7990.3990.79 9 2 . 5 993.8991.8989. 4 989.3989.2989.0988.6988.7990.2991.4991.4992.0992.5989.4990.3990.7999.2998.7998.59 9 8 . 5 1001.7 992.6992.8REMOVE & SALVAGEHYDRANT FOR FUTURE USEREMOVE FIREPIT& BENCHESREMOVE DECKREMOVE GRAVELPARKING AREAREMOVE EXISTINGSANITARY MHREMOVEEXISTINGSIDEWALKREMOVE CURB,SIDEWALK FROMTHIS AREASALVAGECASTINGS FORFUTURE CITY USEREMOVERETAINING WALLREMOVE SHEDREMOVEPAVEMENTREMOVESATELLITE DISHSEE TREE PRESERVATIONPLAN ON SHEET L0.1 FORTREE REMOVALSREMOVEPAVEMENT FORFUTURE CBCONFIRM THISLINE EXISTSDescriptionRev.DateSANTA VERA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04.04.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-100PMJM04/04/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Santa Vera Apartments\CAD\Sheets\DEMOLITION PLAN.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC2.1DEMOLITION PLANLEGENDEXISTINGPROPOSEDPROPERTY BOUNDARYLOT LINESETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINEEASEMENTSTANDARD CURB AND GUTTERFENCERETAINING WALLSCALE IN FEET060301.DEMOLITION NOTES ARE NOT COMPREHENSIVE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION TO OBTAIN A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF THE INTENDED SCOPE OF WORK.2. THE DESIGN SHOWN IS BASED ON ENGINEER'S UNDERSTANDING OF EXISTING CONDITIONS.THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED UPON ALTA AND TOPOGRAPHICMAPPING PREPARED BY XXXX DATED XX-XX-XXXX. IF CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPTEXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS WITHOUT EXCEPTION, CONTRACTOR SHALLHAVE MADE, AT OWN EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYORAND SUBMIT IT TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW.3. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSING INALOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES AND IN ACCORDANCE WITHAPPLICABLE CODES, OF ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING,DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC., SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ONTHE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TOSUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PERTHE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND/OR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.4.CLEARING AND GRUBBING: CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROMTHE SITE AND DISPOSING THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLEFOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL.5.. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DISCONNECTION OF UTILITY SERVICES TO EXISTINGBUILDINGS PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OF THE BUILDINGS.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO REMOVALAND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH UTILITYCOMPANIES CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITYCOMPANIES' FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO UTILITY COMPANIES FORSERVICES. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES.7. CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWNON THIS PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM INFORMATION AVAILABLE. ENGINEER ASSUMESNO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE UTILITY MAPPING ACCURACY. PRIOR TO START OF ANYDEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UTILITY COMPANIES 48 HOURS PRIORTO ANY EXCAVATION FOR ON-SITE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES. THE LOCATIONS OFUTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY CALLING MINNESOTA GOPHER STATEONE CALL AT 800-252-1166 OR651-454-0002.8.THE MAPPING LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING, AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TOBE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION, OR AS THE ONLY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ONTHE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANYANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTIONAND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK.UTILITIES DETERMINED TO BE ABANDONED SHALL BE REMOVED IF UNDER THE BUILDINGINCLUDING 10' BEYOND FOUNDATIONS.9.ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC CABLE AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BEREMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY.ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THEUTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE.CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE ROAD RIGHTOF WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION.10.CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES,ENCLOSURES, ETC., TO THE BEST PRACTICES.11.CONTINUOUS ACCESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AT ALLTIMES DURING DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING FACILITIES12.PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLEDAND APPROVED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY.13.CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT SAW-CUT & PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHEREIT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURREDON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR.14.CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING FEATURES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN. DAMAGE TO ANYEXISTING CONDITIONS TO REMAIN WILL BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.15.ABANDON OR REMOVE ALL SANITARY, WATER AND STORM SERVICES PER CITY STANDARDS.COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH CITY. ALL STREET RESTORATION SHALL BE COMPLETED INCOMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL STANDARDS.16.CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT TO THE GOVERNING AUTHORITY A TRAFFICAND/OR PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC PLAN PER CITY/COUNTY/STATE STANDARDS TO BE APPROVEDBY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY.DEMOLITION NOTES14 606050 5050XXXXX XEM2 STORY FRAME & STUCCO MULTI-UNIT BUILDINGAREA = 9103 SFBLDG #611BLDG #6211 Story Frame & Stucco Garage ComplexArea = 4630 SFCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCANTILEVERW O O D SH E D SIGN "STOP"SIGN "STOP"SIGN "NO PARKING"SARATOGA DRIVELAREDO DRIVE SANTAVERA DRIVE PID: 257620020OWNER: SANTA VERA APARTMENTS LLCPID: 257620010OWNER: CHANHASSEN CITYBITUMINOUS TRAIL BITUMINOUS TRAILBITUMINOUS PARKING LOTSIGN "15MPH"1' BLOCKRET. WALL1' BLOCKRET. WALL1' BLOCKRET. WALLTTCHAIN LINKFENCE1' BLOCKRET. WALL10 1010101010101010 10 10 10 101010ROOF OVERHANGROOF OVERHANG50 DELRIODRIVE50 ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)CONCRETE STAIRSW/ HANDRAILWOOD MULCHCONCRETE STAIRSW/ HANDRAILCONCRETESTAIRSROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)Drainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONSSSSSSAREA : 167713.25 SF3.85 ACRES47.222 . 5 46.222 . 1 46.222 . 2 70.516 . 1 23.514 . 2 16.522 . 517.214 . 1 23.516 . 1 68.822 . 2 46.222 . 1 1. 0 24 . 0 31.81. 0 8.61. 0 43.24. 0 24.040 . 6 83.624 . 0 83.04. 0 24.08.631.842.61. 0 48.63 STORYMULTIFAMILY59 UNITSFFE: 1000.00GFE: 989.33HYD DDDINFILTRATIONBASINHWL:992.17BERM:992.00OUT:989.20BOT:988.00BIOFILTRATIONBASINBERM:990.50HWL:989.99LOW RIM:988.50TOP MEDIA:987.0018.0'26.0'36.0'26.0'18.0'R5.0'R10.0'45.5'26.0'20.0'24.0'R30.0'R54.0'9.0'TYP.R15.0'476111CCCA7511294.0'18171719B1215.0'20.0'20.9'148.6'112BB5.0'5.0'C11239.7'849.2'DescriptionRev.DateSANTA VERA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04.04.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-100PMJM04/04/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Santa Vera Apartments\CAD\Sheets\SITE PLAN.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC3.0SITE PLANLEGENDDEVELOPMENT SUMMARYKEYNOTESB6-12 CURB & GUTTER1ZONING INFORMATIONCURRENT SITE ZONING:PROPOSED SITE ZONING:SITE DATATOTAL SITE AREA:DENSITYTOTAL UNITS:DENSITY:BUILDING SETBACKSFRONT:SIDE:REAR:PARKING-EXISTING 1.89/UNITENCLOSEDEXTERIORTOTALPARKING- NEW - 2.25/ UNITENCLOSEDEXTERIORTOTALSITE PARKING RATIOPARKING DIMENSIONSSTALL DIMENSIONSDRIVE AISLE WIDTHIMPERVIOUS SURFACEREQUIREDPROPOSEDPUDPUD3.85 ACRES50'20'20'45.5'20'20'59 STALLS59 STALLS118 STALLS63 STALLS71 STALLS134 STALLS2 STALLSPER UNIT2.25 STALLSPER UNIT65% MAXPER PUD56%9x18'24'9'x18'24'&26'20 UPA MAX77 UNITS20 UPAADA SIGNAGE & BOLLARDS - SEE CIVIL DETAILS2ADA PARKING STRIPING - SEE CIVIL DETAILS3PEDESTRIAN RAMP WITH TRUNCATED DOMES4FLUSH CURB5CONCRETE SIDEWALK6LIGHT POLE WITH FOUNDATION7RETAINING WALL WITH FENCE8CURB TRANSITION- SEE GRADING PLAN9TRENCH DRAIN- SEE UTILITY PLAN10STOP SIGNMATCH EXISTINGPROPOSEDPROPERTY BOUNDARYSETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINEEASEMENTSTANDARD CURB AND GUTTERHEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONCRETE SIDEWALKHEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENTFENCERETAINING WALL (BY OTHERS)TRAFFIC SIGNLIGHT POLESCALE IN FEET06030ARCHITECTURAL STOOP - COORDINATE WITH STRUCTURALDESIGN BY OTHERSABC17 STALLS17 STALLS34 STALLS11SAW CUT PAVEMENT - MEET AND MATCH12GRILL STATION15 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||UEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUE UE UE UEUE UE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UEUEUE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UE U E UEGGGGGG G G G G GGGGGGGGGGGG GGGGGGGGXXXXXX15" RCP 12" RCP12" RCP 15" PVC15" RCP 24" RCP2 STORY FRAME & STUCCO MULTI-UNIT BUILDINGAREA = 9103 SFBLDG #611BLDG #6211 Story Frame & Stucco Garage ComplexArea = 4630 SFCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCANTILEVERW O O D SH E D SIGN "STOP"SIGN "STOP"SIGN "NO PARKING"SARATOGA DRIVELAREDO DRIVE SANTAVERA DRIVE PID: 257620020OWNER: SANTA VERA APARTMENTS LLCPID: 257620010OWNER: CHANHASSEN CITYBITUMINOUS TRAIL BITUMINOUS TRAILBITUMINOUS PARKING LOTSIGN "15MPH"1' BLOCKRET. WALL1' BLOCKRET. WALL1' BLOCKRET. WALLCHAIN LINKFENCE1' BLOCKRET. WALLCABXCABX10 1010101010101010 10 10 10 101010ROOF OVERHANGROOF OVERHANG12" RCP21" RCP12" PVC1 8 " P V C 8" PVC (PER PLAN) 8" DIP (PER PLAN)6" DIP (PER PLAN)8" DIP (PER PLAN) 8" PVC (PER PLAN)8" CIP (PER PLAN)DELRIODRIVE21" RCPCABXROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)CONCRETE STAIRSW/ HANDRAILWOOD MULCHCONCRETE STAIRSW/ HANDRAILCONCRETESTAIRSROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)GRAVEL LOTDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONCBRE=990.37INV=987.37 NEINV=987.35 SCBRE=990.62CBRE=990.39INV=990.39 NINV=987.36 WCBRE=988.64INV=982.90 NINV=982.87 SINV=984.64 SWCBRE=987.59INV=981.39 NINV=981.43 SINV=983.02 WCBRE=987.33CBRE=987.77INV=981.35 NINV=981.31 SCBRE=987.74INV=981.12 EINV=981.15 SSTSTMHRE=988.19INV=980.55 WINV=? NE/SESUMP=974.87WEIR=982.93NOTCH=980.59STSTMHRE=988.01STSTMHRE=988.04H YDSSCBRE=994.17INV=991.53 SWINV=990.37 EINV=990.35 WSSCBRE=995.23INV=990.75 ECBRE=994.83CBRE=995.60HHCBRE=995.72INV=992.08 NEINV=991.88 SWCBRE=996.29INV=992.59 NEINV=992.85 SWSSAREA : 167713.25 SF3.85 ACRES47.222 . 5 46.222 . 1 46.222 . 2 70.516 . 1 23.514 . 2 16.522 . 517.214 . 1 23.516 . 1 68.822 . 2 46.222 . 1 1. 0 24 . 0 31.81. 0 8.61. 0 43.24. 0 24.040 . 6 83.624 . 0 83.04. 0 24.08.631.842.61. 0 48.6 99 0 995 1000 1005 989 991 992993 994 996 997 998 999 1001 1002 1003 1004 990995 989989 9919919919929939949969971000100099799799899899999910011001995991 992993994996995996997995 996997998999990 99 5 991992 9939949961005.91005.51005.71005.81001.61001.41001.61001.81001.01001.61001.0998.4998.8999.1999.2999.1998.9998.7998.7 997.8995.6997.2995.0994.6995.2993.4993.2993.1993.5993.8992 . 6 994.4995.7999.0996.9995.8997.0995.3995.699 5 . 7 9 9 4 . 4 994.2993.2992.3993.7994.8995.3995.8996.1995.8996.0995.6994.7994.8994.4993.5993.7991.8992.5994.8995.9992.2991.4993.8996.7997.8997.4995.3997.9995.7991.1991.7993.9995.2995.5996.2996.6997.2997.41000.71001.61003.21002.41001.9996.5995.7993.5992.7992.5991.1991.2990.8990.4993.1991.3990.2989.2990.8990.7990.3990.79 9 2 . 5 993.8991.8989. 4 989.3989.2989.0988.6988.7990.2991.4991.4992.0992.5989.4990.3990.7999.2998.7998.59 9 8 . 5 1001.7 992.6992.83 STORYMULTIFAMILY59 UNITSFFE: 1000.00GFE: 989.33UE UE UE UE U E UEGGG G GGGGHYD DDDINFILTRATIONBASINHWL:992.17BERM:992.00OUT:989.20BOT:988.00BIOFILTRATIONBASINBERM:990.50HWL:989.99LOW RIM:988.50TOP MEDIA:987.00|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||UEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUE UE UE UEUE UE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UEUEUE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UE U E UEGGGGGG G G G G GGGGGGGGGGGG GGGGGGGGXXXXXX15" RCP 12" RCP12" RCP 15" PVC15" RCP 24" RCP2 STORY FRAME & STUCCO MULTI-UNIT BUILDINGAREA = 9103 SFBLDG #611BLDG #6211 Story Frame & Stucco Garage ComplexArea = 4630 SFCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCANTILEVERW O O D SH E D SIGN "STOP"SIGN "STOP"SIGN "NO PARKING"SARATOGA DRIVELAREDO DRIVE SANTAVERA DRIVE PID: 257620020OWNER: SANTA VERA APARTMENTS LLCPID: 257620010OWNER: CHANHASSEN CITYBITUMINOUS TRAIL BITUMINOUS TRAILBITUMINOUS PARKING LOTSIGN "15MPH"1' BLOCKRET. WALL1' BLOCKRET. WALL1' BLOCKRET. WALLCHAIN LINKFENCE1' BLOCKRET. WALLCABXCABX10 1010101010101010 10 10 10 101010ROOF OVERHANGROOF OVERHANG12" RCP21" RCP12" PVC1 8 " P V C 8" PVC (PER PLAN) 8" DIP (PER PLAN)6" DIP (PER PLAN)8" DIP (PER PLAN) 8" PVC (PER PLAN)8" CIP (PER PLAN)DELRIODRIVE21" RCPCABXROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)CONCRETE STAIRSW/ HANDRAILWOOD MULCHCONCRETE STAIRSW/ HANDRAILCONCRETESTAIRSROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)GRAVEL LOTDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONCBRE=990.37INV=987.37 NEINV=987.35 SCBRE=990.62CBRE=990.39INV=990.39 NINV=987.36 WCBRE=988.64INV=982.90 NINV=982.87 SINV=984.64 SWCBRE=987.59INV=981.39 NINV=981.43 SINV=983.02 WCBRE=987.33CBRE=987.77INV=981.35 NINV=981.31 SCBRE=987.74INV=981.12 EINV=981.15 SSTSTMHRE=988.19INV=980.55 WINV=? NE/SESUMP=974.87WEIR=982.93NOTCH=980.59STSTMHRE=988.01STSTMHRE=988.04H YDSSCBRE=994.17INV=991.53 SWINV=990.37 EINV=990.35 WSSCBRE=995.23INV=990.75 ECBRE=994.83CBRE=995.60HHCBRE=995.72INV=992.08 NEINV=991.88 SWCBRE=996.29INV=992.59 NEINV=992.85 SWSSAREA : 167713.25 SF3.85 ACRES47.222 . 5 46.222 . 1 46.222 . 2 70.516 . 1 23.514 . 2 16.522 . 517.214 . 1 23.516 . 1 68.822 . 2 46.222 . 1 1. 0 24 . 0 31.81. 0 8.61. 0 43.24. 0 24.040 . 6 83.624 . 0 83.04. 0 24.08.631.842.61. 0 48.6 99 0 995 1000 1005 989 991 992993 994 996 997 998 999 1001 1002 1003 1004 990995 989989 9919919919929939949969971000100099799799899899999910011001995991 992993994996995996997995 996997998999990 99 5 991992 9939949961005.91005.51005.71005.81001.61001.41001.61001.81001.01001.61001.0998.4998.8999.1999.2999.1998.9998.7998.7 997.8995.6997.2995.0994.6995.2993.4993.2993.1993.5993.8992 . 6 994.4995.7999.0996.9995.8997.0995.3995.699 5 . 7 9 9 4 . 4 994.2993.2992.3993.7994.8995.3995.8996.1995.8996.0995.6994.7994.8994.4993.5993.7991.8992.5994.8995.9992.2991.4993.8996.7997.8997.4995.3997.9995.7991.1991.7993.9995.2995.5996.2996.6997.2997.41000.71001.61003.21002.41001.9996.5995.7993.5992.7992.5991.1991.2990.8990.4993.1991.3990.2989.2990.8990.7990.3990.79 9 2 . 5 993.8991.8989. 4 989.3989.2989.0988.6988.7990.2991.4991.4992.0992.5989.4990.3990.7999.2998.7998.59 9 8 . 5 1001.7 992.6992.8-3.8%-3.9%-2.9%-2.0%-0.8%-1.8%-1.6% - 3 . 5% -9 . 4 %-1.5%-4.5%-2.5%-30.0%-4.5%-6.4%-33.3%-3.0%-2.5%-4.9%-1.9%-1.7% -1 . 2 %-2.8%-2.5%-3.5%-2.9%-4.5%-1.8%-9.5%-1 . 6 %-2.8%-2.0%-1.8%-1.6% -7 . 3 %-7.0%997-3.3%-3.3%-4.5%-33.3%-5.0%SITE E.O.-30.3%993994995998996999994995996 99 5 9969991000 99 3 99 1 98 9 990 98 4 988 984 999999996997998 990990994 992 9 9 2 990 988 9 9 0 9 8 8 9949989961004.80 M.E.999.20999.28995.80 M.E.996.00 M.E.995.80 M.E.995.30 M.E.995.20 M.E.996.80 M.E.995.60 M.E.996.30 M.E.995.90 M.E.996.00995.93996.40997.00998.10997.50999.38998.56998.50998.80998.20998.90999.72998.90998.90998.60998.60998.90998.90998.90998.90998.10997.85996.05 M.E.996.60 M.E.999.40999.40999.40991.00 M.E.991.50 M.E.991.70 M.E.991.00 M.E.993.32 M.E.993.05 M.E.993.05 M.E.995.00 M.E.998.70 M.E.998.86 M.E.997.51 M.E.999.06999.121000.00999.50999.50999.50990.90989.33990.20 BW998.20 TW997.80989.331000.00999.50999.50998.40998.07997.50998.30999.10999.04999.60998.46998.50999.50999.70994.22994.15995.12995.70993.20993.60993.56999.60999.40998.68996.30996.00998.30998.50998.54998.38997.06997.60996.70997.28996.30993.60995.00995.60989.20989.20995.60994.70 BW995.70 TW993.701001.30 M.E.1000.30 M.E.996.70 M.E.993.50 M.E.995.50 M.E.999.12999.20998.32998.50999.00998.50999.00998.50998.50999.00998.50999.001000.33 M.E.1000.25 M.E.1000.40 M.E.1001.10 M.E.1000.50 M.E.997.50 M.E.990.00 M.E.989.92 M.E.988.70 M.E.988.70988.20 M.E.988.30 M.E.987.70 M.E.989.20 M.E.988.60994.17992.80992.73994.13996.10995.501002.00 TW999.26 BW994.80 BW995.00 BW995.50 BW1000.00 TW1004.50 TW1002.00 TW995.30 TW997.00 TW997.50 TW991.80 BASIN E.O.993990.40990.00 BASIN E.O.993 991 989 99 0 999.00 E.O.993.70 E.O.990.50 E.O.-33.3%990 98 8988984 995.13994.55995.00994.70997.60997.00997.50996.60994995996997998992991990.50990.50990.50990.50999.00 BW999.00 BW1001.00 BWL O DLODLODLODLODLODLOD L O D LODLODLODLODLO D LO D LODLOD LOD LODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLODLOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLOD LODLOD 65'DescriptionRev.DateSANTA VERA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04.04.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-100PMJM04/04/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Santa Vera Apartments\CAD\Sheets\GRADING PLAN.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC4.0GRADING PLANLEGENDGRADING NOTES1.LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES ASSHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFYSITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TOEXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELYIF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND.2.CONTRACTORS SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACTLOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE, SLOPED PAVEMENT, EXITPORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS, EXACTBUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS, AND EXACT LOCATIONS ANDNUMBER OF DOWNSPOUTS.3.ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF"STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRENCH EXCAVATION ANDBACKFILL/SURFACE RESTORATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERSASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA.4.ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE SIX INCHES OF TOPSOIL ANDSOD OR SEED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OFGRASS IS OBTAINED. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANTING AND TURFESTABLISHMENT.5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAININGTRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS,DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OFTRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BEAPPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROLDEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS6.ALL SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED TO 3:1 OR FLATTER, UNLESS OTHERWISEINDICATED ON THIS SHEET.7.CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADINGAND PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITH UNIFORM SLOPES BETWEENPOINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS ANDEXISTING GRADES.8.SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE FINISHED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS &GUTTER FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARETO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE.9.SEE SOILS REPORT FOR PAVEMENT THICKNESSES AND HOLD DOWNS.10.CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ANY EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL THAT EXISTSAFTER THE SITE GRADING AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. THECONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL IN A MANNERACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND THE REGULATING AGENCIES.11.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL DESIGNCERTIFIED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER.12.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL RULESINCLUDING THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM(NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.13.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY STRUCTURE OR PAVEMENT, A PROOF ROLL, ATMINIMUM, WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE SUBGRADE. PROOF ROLLING SHALL BEACCOMPLISHED BY MAKING MINIMUM OF 2 COMPLETE PASSES WITHFULLY-LOADED TANDEM-AXLE DUMP TRUCK, OR APPROVED EQUAL, IN EACH OF2 PERPENDICULAR DIRECTIONS WHILE UNDER SUPERVISION AND DIRECTION OFTHE INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY. AREAS OF FAILURE SHALL BEEXCAVATED AND RE-COMPACTED AS SPECIFIED HEREIN.14.EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED BENEATH BUILDINGS AND STREET OR PARKINGAREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED DENSITYMETHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3F1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THEGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.15.EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD, STREETS ORPARKING AREA, SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTSOF THEORDINARY COMPACTION METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3F2.16.ALL SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENTGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVINGUNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THEGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORCOORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THEGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.SCALE IN FEET06030PROPERTY BOUNDARYEXISTING CONTOURPROPOSED CONTOURSETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINEEASEMENTSTANDARD CURB AND GUTTERSTORM SEWERFLARED END SECTIONRETAINING WALLDRAINTILEGRADING LIMITSSPOT ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONEMERGENCY OVERFLOWLODD-1.50%1000.00E.O.SPOT ELEV. LABELSM.E.=MATCH EXISTINGTW=TOP OF WALLBW=BOTTOM OF WALLTC=TOP OF CURB16 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||UEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUE UE UE UEUE UE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UEUEUE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UE U E UE15" RCP 12" RCP12" RCP 15" PVC15" RCP 24" RCP8" METAL8" PVC8" VCP (PER PLAN)2 STORY FRAME & STUCCO MULTI-UNIT BUILDINGAREA = 9103 SFBLDG #611BLDG #6211 Story Frame & Stucco Garage ComplexArea = 4630 SFCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCANTILEVERW O O D SH E D SARATOGA DRIVELAREDO DRIVE SANTAVERA DRIVEPID: 257620020OWNER: SANTA VERA APARTMENTS LLC1' BLOCKRET. WALL1' BLOCKRET. WALL1' BLOCKRET. WALLUNKNOWN UPSTREAMSANITARY LOCATION1' BLOCKRET. WALL10 10101010101010101010 10 101010ROOF OVERHANGROOF OVERHANG12" RCP15 " R C P 21" RCP12" PVC1 8 " P V C 8" PVC (PER PLAN) 8" DIP (PER PLAN)6" DIP (PER PLAN)8" DIP (PER PLAN) 8" PVC (PER PLAN)8" CIP (PER PLAN)8" ABS (PER PLAN)DELRIODRIVE21" RCPROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)CONCRETE STAIRSW/ HANDRAILWOOD MULCHCONCRETE STAIRSW/ HANDRAILROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)Drainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONCBRE=990.37INV=987.37 NEINV=987.35 SCBRE=990.62CBRE=990.39INV=990.39 NINV=987.36 WCBRE=988.64INV=982.90 NINV=982.87 SINV=984.64 SWCBRE=987.59INV=981.39 NINV=981.43 SINV=983.02 WCBRE=987.33CBRE=987.77INV=981.35 NINV=981.31 SCBRE=987.74INV=981.12 EINV=981.15 SSTSTMHRE=988.19INV=980.55 WINV=? NE/SESUMP=974.87WEIR=982.93NOTCH=980.59STSTMHRE=988.01STSTMHRE=988.04H YDSSMHRE=988.50INV=975.88 WINV=975.85 ERE=994.17INV=991.53 SWINV=990.37 EINV=990.35 WSSMHRE=995.24CBRE=995.23INV=990.75 ECBRE=994.83CBRE=995.60CBRE=995.72INV=992.08 NEINV=991.88 SWCBRE=996.29INV=992.59 NEINV=992.85 SWSSMHRE=994.50INV=982.01 SWINV=982.60 NWINV=982.08 EAREA : 167713.25 SF3.85 ACRES8.00N16°56'27"EL=137.87meas.(137.88plat)R=474.00Δ=16°39'56"meas.(16°40'00"plat)N89°43'33"W 78.00N00°16'27"E 513.79N89°11'28"W 174.96N53°31'23"W 254.72N00°20'03"E 252.00 L=219.05R=171.00Δ=73°23'36"47.222.546.222.1 46.222 . 2 70.516 . 1 23.514 . 2 16.522 . 517.214 . 1 23.516 . 1 68.822 . 2 46.222.11.024 . 0 31.81. 0 8.61. 0 43.24. 0 24.040 . 6 83.624.0 83.04. 0 24.08.631.842.61.048.63 STORYMULTIFAMILY59 UNITSFFE: 1000.00GFE: 989.33|||||||||||HYD|DDDINFILTRATIONBASINHWL:992.17BERM:992.00OUT:989.20BOT:988.00BIOFILTRATIONBASINBERM:990.50HWL:989.99LOW RIM:988.50TOP MEDIA:987.006" -45° BEND6" -45° BEND6" COMBINED FIRE & DOMESTICSERVICE COORD. W/ MEP6"X6" TEEHYDRANT &6" GATE VALVERE-USE SALVAGEDHYDRANT8" SANITARY SERVICESTUBCOORD. W/ MEPIE=983.50CONNECT TO EX. SSMHCORE DRILL 8" SERVICEPER CITY STANDARDSIE=982.60 SWCONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EX.ELEVATION PRIOR TO CONNECTIONAND CONTACT ENGINEER W/ ANYDISCREPANCIES PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION26 LF -8" PVC @ 3.46%216" C900 WATERMAIN84 LF - 12 " H D P E @ 0 . 5 0 %60 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.17%25 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.40%12" FES W/ TRASH GUARDINV.=989.10CONNECT TO EXISTING6" SERVICE PER CITY STANDARDS(2) RAIN GUARDIAN BUNKERSRIM:993.20INV(N):992.20DRAIN BASIN-200RIM:991.90INV:988.90SUMP:986.9REPLACE EXISTING CASTINGSWITH R-3067-V CASTINGOCS-1LOW RIM:988.50TOP WEIR:988.50INV(N):983.30INV(DT):983.3012" FES W/ TRASH GUARDINV. = 989.2034MH-100RIM: 991.00INV(S):983.20INV(E):983.20CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EX. ELEV. PRIOR TOCONNECTION AND CONTACT ENGINEER W/ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION12" FES W/ TRASH GUARDINV. = 988.50DRAIN BASIN-302RIM:998.30INV(N):992.30INV(E):992.30DRAIN BASIN 301RIM: 993.00INV(NW):988.85INV(SE):988.85SUMP:986.8512" FES W/ TRASH GUARD, INV.=988.00176 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.96%53 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.81%53 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.81%53 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.81%INLINE DRAIN-303RIM:998.50INV(N):992.73INV(S):992.73INLINE DRAIN-304RIM:998.50INV(N):993.16INV(S):993.16INLINE DRAIN-305RIM:998.50INV(N):993.60INV(S):993.60DRAIN BASIN-306RIM:998.50INV(E):994.00INV(S):994.00INLINEDRAIN-307RIM:998.50INV(W):994.50DRAIN BASIN 301-ARIM:990.20INV(N):988.20INV(SE):988.2054 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.81%58 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.86%TD-301-BRIM: 989.20INV:988.2060 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.33%12" BACKFLOW PREVENTERMH300RIM:991.50INV(E):988.65INV(NW):985.65UNDERDRAININV:983.586" PERF. HDPE @ 0.25%TRANSITION FROM PERFORATED TO SOLID UNDERDRAINDRAIN BASIN-402RIM:998.80INV(SE):993.805DRAIN BASIN-400RIM:996.80INV(NW):990.30INV(S):990.30INV(SE):990.30136 LF - 12" HDPE @ 2.60%REUSE TANK (40 LF, 48" PP PIPE)LOW RIM:992.00TOP TANK:990.00INV(NW):988.75INV(SE):985.75BOT TANK:985.5072 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.90%5 LF - 12" HDPE @ 2.00%5 LF - 12" HDPE @ 2.00%12" FES W/ TRASH GUARDINV.=988.5072 LF - 12" HDPE @ 2.50%RELOCATE ELECTRICAL AND GASSERVICES IN COORDINATION WITHSERVICE PROVIDERS12" FES W/ TRASH GUARD, INV.=988.0013.14'DescriptionRev.DateSANTA VERA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04.04.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-100PMJM04/04/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Santa Vera Apartments\CAD\Sheets\UTILITY PLAN.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC5.0UTILITY PLANLEGENDUTILITY NOTES1.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OFEXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUSUTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALLNOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTINGCONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OFDISCREPANCIES.2.ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATER MAIN MATERIAL AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BEPER CITY REQUIREMENTS, MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THECURRENT EDITION OF THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION AS PREPARED BY THE CITYENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM).3.PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARY FEDERAL, STATEAND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSED WORK OR VERIFY WITH THE OWNER OR ENGINEER THATPERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMIT FEES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTORUNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND DIMENSIONSOF DOORWAYS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS, AND EXACT BUILDINGUTILITY CONNECTION LOCATIONS.5.ALL PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OFTHE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE SERVICE LINECONSTRUCTION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES.6.CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY CITY PERMITS FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS ANDUTILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. THE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED48-HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION OR ANY REQUIREDTESTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE, INTERFERE WITH, CONNECT ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO,OR TAP ANY WATER MAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THECITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OFSERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.7.PROVIDE WATER MAIN THRUST RESTRAINTS PER CITY STANDARD REQUIREMENTS.8.PER MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY REQUIREMENTS, A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHESOF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FROMWATERMAIN TO ANY MANHOLE, SEPTIC SYSTEM, CATCH BASIN, SEWER PIPE, OR OTHER SOURCEOF CONTAMINATION, MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OFTHE CONTAMINATION SOURCE UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.9.UTILITY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE 5' OUTSIDE BUILDING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWNOR NOTED.10.WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL EITHER BE AWWA C900 PVC WITH DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS AND RISERS,OR DIP CLASS 52.11.ALL WATER LINES SHALL HAVE 8' MINIMUM COVER (TOP OF PIPE TO FINISH GRADE). INSULATEWATER MAIN IF LESS THAN 8' OF COVER. INSULATION SHALL BE DOW STYROFOAM HI BRAND 35OR EQUIVALENT, WITH 4 INCHES OF THICKNESS.12.SANITARY SEWER PIPE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE THAT IS 8" OR GREATER SHALL BEPOLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 26. SCHEDULE 40 MUST BE USED IS THE PIPE IS 6" OR SMALLER.C900 IS REQUIRED FOR DEPTHS GREATER THAN 20 FEET. SANITARY SEWER PIPE WITHIN 5 FEET OFTHE BUILDING AND UNDER FOOTINGS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D2665. ALL PLASTICSANITARY SEWER SHALL BE INSTALLED PER D2321. SOLVENT WELD JOINTS MUST INCLUDE USE OFA PRIMER WHICH IS OF A CONTRASTING COLOR TO THE PIPE AND CEMENT. ALL SANITARY SEWERSHALL BE TESTED COMPLIANT TO CURRENT MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE.13.STORM SEWER PIPE:13.1.HDPE OR POLYPROPYLENE PIPE MAY BE INSTALLED WITH APPROVAL OF LOCAL GOVERNINGAGENCIES.13.2.HDPE STORM PIPE 4- TO 60-INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ASTMF2648. FITTINGS SHALL BE PER ASTM F2306 AND INSTALLED PER ASTM D2321.13.3.POLYPROPYLENE STORM PIPE 12- TO 60-INCHES IN DIAMETER SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OFASTM F2881. APPROVED FITTINGS SHALL MEET JOINT PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS OFASTM D3212. AT PIPE JOINTS, THE SPIGOT SHALL UTILIZE TWO GASKETS MEETING THEREQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F477. INSTALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321.13.4.PVC STORM SEWER PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PIPE PER ASTM D2665 ANDINSTALLED PER ASTM D2321.13.5.IF REQUIRED BY AHJ, REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 5 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 18"AND SMALLER AND CLASS 3 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 21" AND LARGER UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED, PER ASTM C76 WITH R-4 GASKETS.14.ALL PORTIONS OF SANITARY & STORM SEWER SYSTEMS, INCLUDING STRUCTURES, LOCATEDWITHIN 10-FEET OF A BUILDING AND/OR WATER LINE SHALL BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITHMINNESOTA RULES, PART 4714 AND CURRENT MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE.PROPOSEDPROPERTY BOUNDARYEASEMENTCURB AND GUTTERWATER MAINHYDRANTGATE VALVESANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERFLARED END SECTION W/ RIP RAP & TRASH GUARDDRAINTILERETAINING WALLGASUNDERGROUND ELECTRICOVERHEAD ELECTRICTELEPHONE/FIBERLIGHT POLE|||GGUEUTSCALE IN FEET06030SUTILITY CROSSING TABLECROSSING #UPPER UTILITY BOTTOMOF PIPELOWER UTILITY TOPOF PIPE1WM = 989.10SAN = 984.102WM = 985.20SAN = 979.103STORM = 989.16SAN = 977.964STORM = 989.15WM = 982.505STORM = 989.37SAN = 983.50DOE17 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||UEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUE UE UE UEUE UE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UEUEUE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UE U E UEGGGGGG G G G G GGGGGGGGGGGG GGGGGGGGXXXXXX15" RCP 12" RCP12" RCP 15" PVC15" RCP 24" RCP8" METAL8" PVC8" METAL 8" VCP (PER PLAN)2 STORY FRAME & STUCCO MULTI-UNIT BUILDINGAREA = 9103 SFBLDG #611BLDG #6211 Story Frame & Stucco Garage ComplexArea = 4630 SFCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCANTILEVERW O O D SH E DDeck SARATOGA DRIVELAREDO DRIVE SANTAVERA DRIVE PID: 257620020OWNER: SANTA VERA APARTMENTS LLCPID: 257620010OWNER: CHANHASSEN CITYBITUMINOUS TRAIL BITUMINOUS TRAILBITUMINOUS PARKING LOT1' BLOCKRET. WALL1' BLOCKRET. WALL1' BLOCKRET. WALL4' WOODRET. WALLUNKNOWN UPSTREAMSANITARY LOCATIONCHAIN LINKFENCE1' BLOCKRET. WALLCABXSATELLITE DISHCABX10 1010101010101010 10 10 10 101010ROOF OVERHANGROOF OVERHANG12" RCP21" RCP12" PVC1 8 " P V C 8" PVC (PER PLAN) 8" DIP (PER PLAN)6" DIP (PER PLAN)8" DIP (PER PLAN) 8" PVC (PER PLAN)8" CIP (PER PLAN)8" ABS (PER PLAN)8" ABS (PER PLAN)SAN SEWER (PER GSOC)WATER 6" DIP (PER GSOC & PLAN)DELRIODRIVE21" RCPPORTABLESHEDCABXROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)WOODBENCHESFIRE PITCONCRETE STAIRSW/ HANDRAILWOOD MULCHCONCRETE STAIRSW/ HANDRAILCONCRETESTAIRSROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)GRAVEL LOTNO PARKINGDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONCBRE=990.37INV=987.37 NEINV=987.35 SCBRE=990.62CBRE=990.39INV=990.39 NINV=987.36 WCBRE=988.64INV=982.90 NINV=982.87 SINV=984.64 SWCBRE=987.59INV=981.39 NINV=981.43 SINV=983.02 WCBRE=987.33CBRE=987.77INV=981.35 NINV=981.31 SCBRE=987.74INV=981.12 EINV=981.15 SSTSTMHRE=988.19INV=980.55 WINV=? NE/SESUMP=974.87WEIR=982.93NOTCH=980.59STSTMHRE=988.01STSTMHRE=988.04H YDSSSSMHRE=988.50INV=975.88 WINV=975.85 E#111-20" ash#113-10" spruce#114-28" maple#116-60" basswood, multi-stem#117-30" maple#1-boxelder, 3-stem(8,8,8)#2-13" boxelder#5-poplar, 2-stem(15,13)#3-boxelder, 3-stem(8,8,4)#6-poplar, 4-stem(20,20,20,10)#8-13" poplar#22-poplar, 2-stem(20,16)#23-poplar, 2-stem(24,12)#24-poplar, 2-stem(20,20)#25-poplar, 2-stem(10,6)#110-16" pine#109-30" maple#108-22" maple#107-26" maple#106-14" pine#4-boxelder, 4-stem(10,8,6,5)#12-10" boxelder#112-22 maple#105-22" pine#104-15" pine#102-14" pine#101-15" ash#100-14" ash#98-20" spruce#99-18" maple#103-16" pine#97-15" spruce#96-20" mapleCBRE=994.17INV=991.53 SWINV=990.37 EINV=990.35 WSSSSMHRE=995.24CBRE=995.23INV=990.75 ECBRE=994.83CBRE=995.60HHCBRE=995.72INV=992.08 NEINV=991.88 SWCBRE=996.29INV=992.59 NEINV=992.85 SW#86-50" cottonwood#85-20" cottonwood#84-16" boxelder#83-14" boxelder#81-11" boxelder#82-20" crabapple#87-12" maple#88-ash, 2-stem(8,8)#89-22" maple#90 15" maple#91-16" maple#95-48" maple#94-18" maple#93-15" maple#92-15" maple#131-10" red cedar#133-12" cottonwood#132-10" red cedar#79-15" crabapple#80-12" crabapple#78-boxelder, 4-stem(8,8,6,6)#126-11" cottonwood#125-10" elm#124-10" red cedar#123-14" cottonwood#122-10 cottonwood#121-30" cottonwood#120-18" cottonwood#119-10" cottonwood#118-28" maple#26-poplar, 3-stem(20,14,14)#27-20" poplar#28-24" poplar#29-14" poplar#33-11" poplar#32-20" poplar#30-30" poplar#31-poplar, 2-stem(14,14)#7-18" poplar#9-boxelder, 2-stem(10,8)#10-poplar, 2-stem(42,13)#11-35' spruce#16-20" poplar#14-11" boxelder#13-60" cottonwood#15-11" boxelder#20-10" boxelder#19-26" poplar#18-24" poplar#17-24" poplar#37-10" boxelder#35-10" boxelder#36-10" boxelder#34-10" boxelderHYD TNH996.69CSSSSSMHRE=993.60INV=983.83 NEINV=983.86 SW (ORIFICE, NO PIPE)SSSSMHRE=994.50INV=982.01 SWINV=982.60 NWINV=982.08 E#48-10" boxelder#41-10" boxelder#21-boxelder, 3-stem(10,10,10)#38-10" boxelder#39-36" poplar#40-36" poplar#42-10" boxelder#43-14" boxelder#44-16" boxelder#51-11" boxelder#52-10" boxelder#53-12" boxelder#54-11" boxelder#55-10" ash#45-11" boxelder#47-14" boxelder#46-10" boxelder#49-11" boxelder#50-silver maple, 5-stem(12,12,9,6,4)#59-10" maple#60-silver maple, 4-stem(18,16,10,8)#70-26" silver maple#58-10 ash#56-10" ash#57-10" ash#61-basswood, 4-stem(8,8,6,4)#63-12" crabapple#62-10" boxelder#64-14" ash#65-10" ash#66-10" ash#67-12" ash#74-10" boxelder#73-14" boxelder#68-silver maple, 3-stem(8,5,4)#69-16" silver maple#71-15" maple#72-15" maple#75-12" elm#76-14" ash#127-12" cottonwood#128-cottonwood, 2-stem(10,8)#129-10" maple#130-15" cottonwood#77-15' red cedarAREA : 167713.25 SF3.85 ACRES8.00N16°56'27"EL=137.87meas.(137.88plat)R=474.00Δ=16°39'56"meas.(16°40'00"plat)N89°43'33"W 78.00N00°16'27"E 513.79N89°11'28"W 174.96N53°31'23"W 254.72N00°20'03"E 252.00 L=219.05R=171.00Δ=73°23'36"47.222 . 5 46.222 . 1 46.222 . 2 70.516 . 1 23.514 . 2 16.522 . 517.214 . 1 23.516 . 1 68.822 . 2 46.222 . 1 1. 0 24 . 0 31.81. 0 8.61. 0 43.24. 0 24.040 . 6 83.624 . 0 83.04. 0 24.08.631.842.61. 0 48.6 99 0 995 1000 1005 989 991 992993 994 996 997 998 999 1001 1002 1003 1004 990995 989989 9919919919929939949969971000100099799799899899999910011001995991 992993994996995996997995 996997998999990 99 5 991992 993994996 INSTALL SILT FENCEPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL SILT FENCEPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL SILT FENCEPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL SILT FENCEPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL ROCK ENTRANCEPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL INLET PROTECTIONPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL INLET PROTECTIONPER CIVIL DETAILSDescriptionRev.DateSANTA VERA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04.04.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-100PMJM04/04/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Santa Vera Apartments\CAD\Sheets\EROSION CONTROL PLANS.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC6.0PHASE 1EROSIONCONTROLLEGENDPROPOSEDPROPERTY BOUNDARYINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOURSETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINEEASEMENTSTANDARD CURB AND GUTTERSTORM SEWERFLARED END SECTIONWATER MAINSANITARY SEWERRETAINING WALLDRAINTILEGRADING LIMITSSPOT ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONEMERGENCY OVERFLOWWALL LABEL|LODSCALE IN FEET06030DEROSION CONTROL NOTES1.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ONRECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTSTAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEINGEXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONSPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OFDISCREPANCIES.2.ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN-PLACEPRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINEDUNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUNDCOVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILTFENCE ON-SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BECONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREMEIMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECTTO EROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAYBALES, ETC.,REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT.3.EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL (ESC): THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUMECOMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLLING ALL SILTATION AND EROSIONOF THE PROJECT AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHATEVER MEANSNECESSARY TO CONTROL THE EROSION AND SILTATION INCLUDING BUT NOTLIMITED TO: CATCH BASIN INSERTS, CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET, AND SILT FENCE. ESC SHALL COMMENCE WITH GRADINGAND CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THEWORK BYTHE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDES ALLIMPLEMENTATION AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITINGOF SILT. THE OWNER MAY DIRECT THE CONTRACTOR'S METHODS AS DEEMEDFIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS. ANY DEPOSITION OF SILT ORMUD ON NEW OR EXISTING PAVEMENT OR IN EXISTING STORM SEWERS ORSWALES SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT. AFFECTED AREAS SHALLBE CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT THE EXPENSE OFTHE CONTRACTOR. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE REMOVEDBY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THE TURF IS ESTABLISHED.4.ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THEEND OF EACH WORKING DAY. A CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUSTBE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTOPUBLIC STREETS.5.PROPOSED PONDS SHALL BE EXCAVATED FIRST AND USED AS TEMPORARYPONDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.6.WHEN INSTALLING END-OF-LINE FLARED END SECTIONS, BRING THE SILT FENCEUP & OVER THE FLARED END SECTIONS & COVER DISTURBED AREAS WITH RIPRAP. THE UPSTREAM FLARED END SECTIONS SHALL HAVE WOOD FIBER BLANKETINSTALLED ON THE DISTURBED SOILS.7.ALL UNPAVED AREAS ALTERED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST BERESTORED WITH SEED AND MULCH, SOD, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR BEHARD SURFACED WITHIN 2 WEEKS OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.8.THE SITE MUST BE STABILIZED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MPCA, NPDES,MNDOT, AND CITY.A. TEMPORARY (GREATER THAN 1-YEAR) SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 22-111AT 30.5-POUNDS PER ACRE.B. TEMPORARY (LESS THAN 1-YEAR) SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112(FALL) OR 21-111 (SPRING/SUMMER) AT 100-POUNDS PER ACREC.INFILTRATION/FILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 34-262 AT14.5-POUNDS PER ACRE.D. POND SLOPES SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 AT 35-POUNDS PER ACRE.E. GENERAL SEEDING SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 25-151 AT 70-POUNDS PERACRE.F. MULCH SHALL BE MNDOT TYPE 1 APPLIED AT 2-TONS PER ACRE.9.FOR AREAS WITH SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER, RESTORATION WITH SOD OREROSION CONTROL BLANKET IS REQUIRED.10.ALL TEMPORARY STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE INSTALLED AROUNDTHEM TO TRAP SEDIMENT.11.ALL PERMANENT PONDS USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS DURINGCONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DREDGED AFTER THE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED TORESTORE THE POND TO THE PROPOSED BOTTOM ELEVATION.12.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL AND STATE RULESINCLUDING THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM(NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.13.THE SITE MUST BE KEPT IN A WELL-DRAINED CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. THECONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TEMPORARY DITCHES, PIPING, OROTHER MEANS REQUIRED TO INSURE PROPER DRAINAGE DURINGCONSTRUCTION. LOW POINTS IN ROADWAYS OR BUILDING PADS MUST BEPROVIDED WITH A POSITIVE OUTFLOW.18 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||UEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUE UE UE UEUE UE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UEUEUE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UE U E UEGGGGGG G G G GGGG GGGGGGGGG GGGGGGGGXXXXXX15" RCP 12" RCP12" RCP 15" PVC15" RCP 24" RCPSARATOGA DRIVELAREDO DRIVE SANTAVERA DRIVEPID: 257620010OWNER: CHANHASSEN CITYBITUMINOUS TRAILBITUMINOUS TRAILBITUMINOUS PARKING LOTCHAIN LINKCABXCABX10 10101010101010101010 10 10101012" RCP21" RCP12" PVC1 8 " P V C 8" PVC (PER PLAN) 8" DIP (PER PLAN)6" DIP (PER PLAN)8" DIP (PER PLAN) 8" PVC (PER PLAN)8" CIP (PER PLAN)DELRIODRIVE21" RCPCABXROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)WOOD MULCHCONCRETESTAIRSROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)GRAVEL LOTDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONCBRE=990.37INV=987.37 NEINV=987.35 SCBRE=990.62CBRE=990.39INV=990.39 NINV=987.36 WCBRE=988.64INV=982.90 NINV=982.87 SINV=984.64 SWCBRE=987.59INV=981.39 NINV=981.43 SINV=983.02 WCBRE=987.33CBRE=987.77INV=981.35 NINV=981.31 SCBRE=987.74INV=981.12 EINV=981.15 SSTSTMHRE=988.19INV=980.55 WINV=? NE/SESUMP=974.87WEIR=982.93NOTCH=980.59STSTMHRE=988.01STSTMHRE=988.04H YDSSCBRE=994.17INV=991.53 SWINV=990.37 EINV=990.35 WSSCBRE=995.23INV=990.75 ECBRE=994.83CBRE=995.60HHCBRE=995.72INV=992.08 NEINV=991.88 SWCBRE=996.29INV=992.59 NEINV=992.85 SWSS8.00N16°56'27"EL=137.87meas.(137.88plat)R=474.00Δ=16°39'56"meas.(16°40'00"plat)N89°43'33"W 78.00N00°16'27"E 513.79N89°11'28"W 174.96N53°31'23"W 254.72N00°20'03"E 252.00 L=219.05R=171.00Δ=73°23'36" 99 0 995 1000 1005 989 991 992993 994 996 997 998 999 1001 1002 1003 1004 990995 989989 9919919919929939949969971000100099799799899899999910011001995991 992993994996995996997995 996997998999990 995 991992 993994996-3.8%-3.9%-2.9%-2.0%-0.8%-1.8%-1.6%-3. 5% -9 . 4 %-1.5%-4.5%-2.5%-30.0%-4.5%-6.4%-33.3%-3.0%-2.5%-4.9%-1.9%-1.7%-1.2%-2.8%-2.5%-3.5%-2.9%-4.5%-1.8%-9.5%-1.6%-2.8%-2.0%-1.8%-1.6% -7 . 3 %-7.0%997-3.3%-3.3%-4.5%-33.3%-5.0%SITE E.O.-30.3%993994995998996999994995996 99 5 9969991000 99 3 99 1 98 9 990 98 4 988 984 999999996997998990 990994 992 9 9 2 990 988 9 9 0 9 8 8 9949989961004.80 M.E.999.20999.28995.80 M.E.996.00 M.E.995.80 M.E.995.30 M.E.995.20 M.E.996.80 M.E.995.60 M.E.996.30 M.E.995.90 M.E.996.00995.93996.40997.00998.10997.50999.38998.56998.50998.80998.20998.90999.72998.90998.90998.60998.60998.90998.90998.90998.90998.10997.85996.05 M.E.996.60 M.E.999.40999.40999.40991.00 M.E.991.50 M.E.991.70 M.E.991.00 M.E.993.32 M.E.993.05 M.E.993.05 M.E.995.00 M.E.998.70 M.E.998.86 M.E.997.51 M.E.999.06999.121000.00999.50999.50999.50990.90989.33990.20 BW998.20 TW997.80989.331000.00999.50999.50998.40998.07997.50998.30999.10999.04999.60998.46998.50999.50999.70994.22994.15995.12995.70993.20993.60993.56999.60999.40998.68996.30996.00998.30998.50998.54998.38997.06997.60996.70997.28996.30993.60995.00995.60989.20989.20995.60994.70 BW995.70 TW993.701001.30 M.E.1000.30 M.E.996.70 M.E.993.50 M.E.995.50 M.E.999.12999.20998.32998.50999.00998.50999.00998.50998.50999.00998.50999.001000.33 M.E.1000.25 M.E.1000.40 M.E.1001.10 M.E.1000.50 M.E.997.50 M.E.990.00 M.E.989.92 M.E.988.70 M.E.988.70988.20 M.E.988.30 M.E.987.70 M.E.989.20 M.E.988.60994.17992.80992.73994.13996.10995.501002.00 TW999.26 BW994.80 BW995.00 BW995.50 BW1000.00 TW1004.50 TW1002.00 TW995.30 TW997.00 TW997.50 TW991.80 BASIN E.O.993990.40990.00 BASIN E.O.993 991 989 99 0 999.00 E.O.993.70 E.O.990.50 E.O.-33.3%990 98 8988984 995.13994.55995.00994.70997.60997.00997.50996.60994995996997998992991990.50990.50990.50990.50999.00 BW999.00 BW1001.00 BW|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||UEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUE UE UE UEUE UE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UEUEUE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UE U E UEGGGGGG G G G GGGG GGGGGGGGG GGGGGGGGXXXXXX15" RCP 12" RCP12" RCP 15" PVC15" RCP 24" RCPSARATOGA DRIVELAREDO DRIVE SANTAVERA DRIVEPID: 257620010OWNER: CHANHASSEN CITYBITUMINOUS TRAILBITUMINOUS TRAILBITUMINOUS PARKING LOTCHAIN LINKCABXCABX10 10101010101010101010 10 10101012" RCP21" RCP12" PVC1 8 " P V C 8" PVC (PER PLAN) 8" DIP (PER PLAN)6" DIP (PER PLAN)8" DIP (PER PLAN) 8" PVC (PER PLAN)8" CIP (PER PLAN)DELRIODRIVE21" RCPCABXROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)WOOD MULCHCONCRETESTAIRSROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)GRAVEL LOTDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONCBRE=990.37INV=987.37 NEINV=987.35 SCBRE=990.62CBRE=990.39INV=990.39 NINV=987.36 WCBRE=988.64INV=982.90 NINV=982.87 SINV=984.64 SWCBRE=987.59INV=981.39 NINV=981.43 SINV=983.02 WCBRE=987.33CBRE=987.77INV=981.35 NINV=981.31 SCBRE=987.74INV=981.12 EINV=981.15 SSTSTMHRE=988.19INV=980.55 WINV=? NE/SESUMP=974.87WEIR=982.93NOTCH=980.59STSTMHRE=988.01STSTMHRE=988.04H YDSSCBRE=994.17INV=991.53 SWINV=990.37 EINV=990.35 WSSCBRE=995.23INV=990.75 ECBRE=994.83CBRE=995.60HHCBRE=995.72INV=992.08 NEINV=991.88 SWCBRE=996.29INV=992.59 NEINV=992.85 SWSS8.00N16°56'27"EL=137.87meas.(137.88plat)R=474.00Δ=16°39'56"meas.(16°40'00"plat)N89°43'33"W 78.00N00°16'27"E 513.79N89°11'28"W 174.96N53°31'23"W 254.72N00°20'03"E 252.00 L=219.05R=171.00Δ=73°23'36" 99 0 995 1000 1005 989 991 992993 994 996 997 998 999 1001 1002 1003 1004 990995 989989 9919919919929939949969971000100099799799899899999910011001995991 992993994996995996997995 996997998999990 995 991992 9939949963 STORYMULTIFAMILY59 UNITSFFE: 1000.00GFE: 989.33HYD DDDINFILTRATIONBASINHWL:992.17BERM:992.00OUT:989.20BOT:988.00BIOFILTRATIONBASINBERM:990.50HWL:989.99LOW RIM:988.50TOP MEDIA:987.00 INSTALL SILT FENCEPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL SILT FENCEPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL SILT FENCEPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL SILT FENCEPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL ROCK ENTRANCEPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL INLET PROTECTIONPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL INLET PROTECTIONPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL BIO ROLLSPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL INLET PROTECTIONPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL BIO ROLLSPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL BIO ROLLSPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL INLET PROTECTIONPER CIVIL DETAILSINSTALL INLET PROTECTIONPER CIVIL DETAILSDescriptionRev.DateSANTA VERA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04.04.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-100PMJM04/04/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Santa Vera Apartments\CAD\Sheets\EROSION CONTROL PLANS.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC6.1PHASE 2EROSIONCONTROLLEGENDSCALE IN FEET06030EROSION CONTROL NOTES1.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ONRECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTSTAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEINGEXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONSPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OFDISCREPANCIES.2.ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN-PLACEPRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINEDUNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUNDCOVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILTFENCE ON-SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BECONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREMEIMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECTTO EROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAYBALES, ETC.,REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT.3.EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL (ESC): THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUMECOMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLLING ALL SILTATION AND EROSIONOF THE PROJECT AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHATEVER MEANSNECESSARY TO CONTROL THE EROSION AND SILTATION INCLUDING BUT NOTLIMITED TO: CATCH BASIN INSERTS, CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET, AND SILT FENCE. ESC SHALL COMMENCE WITH GRADINGAND CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THEWORK BYTHE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDES ALLIMPLEMENTATION AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITINGOF SILT. THE OWNER MAY DIRECT THE CONTRACTOR'S METHODS AS DEEMEDFIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS. ANY DEPOSITION OF SILT ORMUD ON NEW OR EXISTING PAVEMENT OR IN EXISTING STORM SEWERS ORSWALES SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT. AFFECTED AREAS SHALLBE CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT THE EXPENSE OFTHE CONTRACTOR. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE REMOVEDBY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THE TURF IS ESTABLISHED.4.ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THEEND OF EACH WORKING DAY. A CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUSTBE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTOPUBLIC STREETS.5.PROPOSED PONDS SHALL BE EXCAVATED FIRST AND USED AS TEMPORARYPONDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.6.WHEN INSTALLING END-OF-LINE FLARED END SECTIONS, BRING THE SILT FENCEUP & OVER THE FLARED END SECTIONS & COVER DISTURBED AREAS WITH RIPRAP. THE UPSTREAM FLARED END SECTIONS SHALL HAVE WOOD FIBER BLANKETINSTALLED ON THE DISTURBED SOILS.7.ALL UNPAVED AREAS ALTERED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST BERESTORED WITH SEED AND MULCH, SOD, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR BEHARD SURFACED WITHIN 2 WEEKS OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.8.THE SITE MUST BE STABILIZED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MPCA, NPDES,MNDOT, AND CITY.A. TEMPORARY (GREATER THAN 1-YEAR) SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 22-111AT 30.5-POUNDS PER ACRE.B. TEMPORARY (LESS THAN 1-YEAR) SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112(FALL) OR 21-111 (SPRING/SUMMER) AT 100-POUNDS PER ACREC.INFILTRATION/FILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 34-262 AT14.5-POUNDS PER ACRE.D. POND SLOPES SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 AT 35-POUNDS PER ACRE.E. GENERAL SEEDING SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 25-151 AT 70-POUNDS PERACRE.F. MULCH SHALL BE MNDOT TYPE 1 APPLIED AT 2-TONS PER ACRE.9.FOR AREAS WITH SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER, RESTORATION WITH SOD OREROSION CONTROL BLANKET IS REQUIRED.10.ALL TEMPORARY STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE INSTALLED AROUNDTHEM TO TRAP SEDIMENT.11.ALL PERMANENT PONDS USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS DURINGCONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DREDGED AFTER THE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED TORESTORE THE POND TO THE PROPOSED BOTTOM ELEVATION.12.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL AND STATE RULESINCLUDING THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM(NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.13.THE SITE MUST BE KEPT IN A WELL-DRAINED CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. THECONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TEMPORARY DITCHES, PIPING, OROTHER MEANS REQUIRED TO INSURE PROPER DRAINAGE DURINGCONSTRUCTION. LOW POINTS IN ROADWAYS OR BUILDING PADS MUST BEPROVIDED WITH A POSITIVE OUTFLOW.RPBCWD STANDARD EROSIONCONTROL NOTES1.NATURAL TOPOGRAPHY AND SOIL CONDITIONS MUST BE PROTECTED,INCLUDING RETENTION ONSITE OF NATIVE TOPSOIL TO THE GREATEST EXTENTPOSSIBLE.2.ADDITIONAL MEASURES, SUCH AS HYDRAULIC MULCHING AND OTHERPRACTICES AS SPECIFIED BY THE DISTRICT MUST BE USED ON SLOPES OF 3:1(H:V) OR STEEPER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STABILIZATION.3.FINAL SITE STABILIZATION MEASURES MUST SPECIFY THAT AT LEAST SIX INCHESOF TOPSOIL OR A MINIMUM OF 5% ORGANIC MATTER BE SPREAD ANDINCORPORATED INTO THE UNDERLYING SOIL DURING FINAL SITE TREATMENTWHEREVER TOPSOIL HAS BEEN REMOVED.4.CONSTRUCTION SITE WASTE SUCH AS DISCARDED BUILDING MATERIALS,CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT, CHEMICALS, LITTER AND SANITARY WASTE MUSTBE PROPERLY MANAGED.5.ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BEMAINTAINED UNTIL COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION AND VEGETATION ISESTABLISHED SUFFICIENTLY TO ENSURE STABILITY OF THE SITE, AS DETERMINEDBY THE DISTRICT.6.ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BE REMOVEDUPON FINAL STABILIZATION.7.SOIL SURFACES COMPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REMAININGPERVIOUS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DECOMPACTEDTO ACHIEVE A SOIL COMPACTION TESTING PRESSURE OF LESS THAN 1,400KILOPASCALS OR 200 POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH IN THE UPPER 12 INCHES OFTHE SOIL PROFILE WHILE TAKING CARE TO PROTECT UTILITIES, TREE ROOTS, ANDOTHER EXISTING VEGETATION.8.ALL DISTURBED AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTERLAND-DISTURBING WORK HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED ON APROPERTY THAT DRAINS TO AN IMPAIRED WATER, WITHIN 14 DAYS ELSEWHERE.9.THE PERMITTEE MUST, AT A MINIMUM, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALLDISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIESAND SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES EVERY DAY WORK IS PERFORMED ON THESITE AND AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL LAND-DISTURBINGACTIVITY HAS CEASED.THEREAFTER, THE PERMITTEE MUST PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES AT LEASTWEEKLY UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED. THE PERMITTEE WILLMAINTAIN A LOG OF ACTIVITIES UNDER THIS SECTION FOR INSPECTION BY THEDISTRICT ON REQUEST.PROPERTY BOUNDARYEXISTING CONTOURPROPOSED CONTOURSETBACK LINERIGHT OF WAY LINEEASEMENTSTANDARD CURB AND GUTTERSTORM SEWERFLARED END SECTIONRETAINING WALLDRAINTILEGRADING LIMITSSPOT ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONEMERGENCY OVERFLOWROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETINLET PROTECTIONSILT FENCEBIOROLLLODD-1.50%1000.00E.O.19 DescriptionRev.DateSANTA VERA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04.04.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-100PMJM04/04/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Santa Vera Apartments\CAD\Sheets\SWPPP NARRATIVE & NOTES.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC7.0SWPPP NARRATIVE& NOTESLISTED BELOW ARE ADDITIONAL BMP'S THAT MAY BE CONSIDERED FOR USE IF THE BMP'S IDENTIFIED IN THEEROSION CONTROL PLANS PROVE TO BE INSUFFICIENT. PAYMENT FOR THESE BMP'S MAY ONLY BE MADE IFPRIOR APPROVAL FROMAN OWNER HAS BEEN GIVEN.1.IMPORTANT VEGETATION·SAFETY FENCE OR A SIMILAR METHOD OF PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED TO PROTECT IMPORTANTVEGETATION AND PROHIBIT VEHICULAR TRAFFIC.·A SECONDARY SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT FIELD OFFICES, STORED EQUIPMENT (INCLUDINGVEHICLE PARKING), CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL LOCATIONS, AND TOPSOIL OR FILL STOCKPILESINSTALLED WITHIN A 25-FOOT MINIMUM BUFFER OUTSIDE THE DRIP LINE OF TREES.2.DITCH PROTECTION (TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT)·THE LAST 200 FEET OF ANY DITCH CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER SHALL HAVE TEMPORARY ORPERMANENT STABILIZATION MEASURES IN PLACE WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DIRECT CONNECTION TO ASURFACE WATER. DITCHES MAY BE KEPT IN A "SMOOTH" ROUGH GRADED CONDITION IN ORDER TOPROPERLY INSTALL EROSION CONTROL SEEDING, MULCH, MATS AND BLANKETS.·STABILIZATION METHODS FOR DITCH BOTTOM WETTED PERIMETER MAY INCLUDE ONE OF THEFOLLOWING OR COMBINATIONS OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, MATS, RIP-RAP, BIO-ROLLS OR ROCKCHECK DAMS. THE METHOD CHOSEN WILL BE BASED ON AN ANALYSIS OF THE SLOPE AND VELOCITYOF THE RUNOFF. THESE ARE ADDITIONAL BMP'S WHICH MAY BE CONSIDERED FOR USE IF THE BMP'SIDENTIFIED IN THE EROSION CONTROL PLANS PROVE TO BE INSUFFICIENT. PAYMENT FOR THESE BMP'SMAY ONLY BE MADE IF PRIOR APPROVAL FROM AN OWNER HAS BEEN GIVEN.·WHERE DITCH GRADES EXCEED 5%, ROCK CHECK DAMS OR EQUIVALENT BMP SHALL BE INSTALLED.CHECK DAMS TO BE SPACED SO THAT THE CREST OF THE DOWNSTREAM DAM IS AT THE ELEVATION OFTHE TOE OF THE UPSTREAM DAM. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED DUE TOCONTRACTORS METHOD OF SEQUENCING THEIR CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THEGRADING CONTRACT.·ABOVE THE WETTED PERIMETER, THE DITCH WILL BE STABILIZED BY SEEDING AND MULCH AND/OREROSION CONTROL BLANKETS DEPENDING ON SIDE SLOPE STEEPNESS AND LENGTH.·ALL DITCHES WILL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 14 DAYS.3. WORK NEXT TO WETLANDS·PRESERVE A 100' FROM SPECIAL WATERS) NATURAL BUFFER, OR IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE, PROVIDEREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TO DISTURBANCE OF UP-GRADIENT AREAS.·FILL SLOPES ADJACENT TO WETLANDS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED WITHIN 7 DAYS OFCOMPLETION OF WORK. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AS INDICATED ON THE EROSIONCONTROL / GRADING PLAN.4. LONG-STEEP CUT/FILL SLOPES·THERE WILL BE NO UNBROKEN SURFACE SLOPE LENGTHS OF GREATER THAN 75 FEET FOR SLOPES WITHA GRADE OF 3:1 OR STEEPER WITHIN 200 FEET OF SURFACE WATERS. ALL EXPOSED AREAS WITH ACONTINUOUS POSITIVE SLOPE WITHIN 200 FEET OF A SURFACE WATER WILL HAVE A TEMPORARY ORPERMANENT COVER YEAR ROUND. THE EXPOSED SOILS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 14 DAYS·PLANNED SLOPES OF 3:1 (H:V) OR STEEPER AND GREATER THAN 75 FT IN LENGTH WILL BE TEMPORARILYOR PERMANENTLY STABILIZED IN INCREMENTS NOT TO EXCEED 75 FT, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ORDISTURBING A NEW INCREMENT.·LONG SLOPES SHOULD BE BROKEN INTO SHORTER LENGTHS BY INSTALLING STRAW BIOROLLS ININTERLOCKING HERRINGBONES AS SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN. IF TEMPORARY SEEDING ANDMULCH CAN NOT BE USED ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1, THEN THE SLOPE MAY BE COVERED WITHTARPS OR PLASTIC SHEETING. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED DUE TOCONTRACTORS METHOD OF SEQUENCING THEIR CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THEGRADING CONTRACT.·THE SOIL SURFACE ON RE-VEGETATED SLOPES WILL BE ROUGHENED USING ANY APPROPRIATEIMPLEMENT THAT CAN BE SAFELY OPERATED ON THE SLOPE, SUCH AS BULLDOZERS OR DISKS. THEGROOVES SHALL BE CREATED PERPENDICULAR TO THE SLOPE TO HELP ESTABLISH VEGETATIVE COVER,REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITY, INCREASE INFILTRATION, AND PROVIDE FOR SEDIMENT TRAPPING.5.CULVERT INLET/OUTLET PROTECTION·SOD MAY BE PLACED AND ANCHORED AT CULVERT INLETS AS SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN, UNLESSVELOCITIES REQUIRE RIPRAP.·AT LEAST ONE 2-FOOT WIDE STRIP OF SOD OR FIBER BLANKET SHALL BE PLACED ALONG THE EDGES OFCULVERT HEADWALLS AND WINGWALLS AS SHOWN ON THE GRADING AND/OR UTILITY PLANS.·RIPRAP AT PIPE APRON OUTLETS WILL BE PLACED PRIOR TO BUT NO SOONER THAN 7 DAYS BEFOREAPRON IS INSTALLED. RIPRAP SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDER APRON LIP ACCORDING TO THE STANDARDDETAIL.6.STORM SEWER INLET PROTECTION·STORM DRAIN INLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED UNTIL THE DISTURBED AREAS THAT COULD DISCHARGE TOAN INLET HAVE BEEN STABILIZED.·INFRASAFE SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIERS OR APPROVED EQUAL SHALL BE USED WHEN CASTINGS ARENOT IN PLACE AS INDICATED ON THE UTILITY PLAN AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER.·INFRASAFE DEBRIS COLLECTION DEVICE OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT SHALL BE USED WHEN CASTINGSARE IN PLACE AS INDICATED ON THE UTILITY PLAN AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER.·DOCUMENTATION IS NEEDED WITHIN 72 HOURS IF REMOVAL OF PROTECTION BMPS IS NEEDED DUE TOWINTER CONDITIONS OR FLOODING CONCERNS.7.STORM WATER POND OUTLETS·TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION MEASURES SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE STORMWATER POND OUTLETS WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DIRECT CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER.·RIPRAP AT PIPE APRON OUTLETS WILL BE PLACED PRIOR TO APRON INSTALLATION AND SHALL BEINSTALLED UNDER THE APRON LIP.·POND EMERGENCY SPILLWAYS SHALL BE LINED BASED ON THE DESIGN DISCHARGE FLOW VELOCITYAND AS INDICATED ON GRADING AND/OR UTILITY PLANS.8.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS·TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS WILL BE PROVIDED WHERE 10 OR MORE ACRES OF DISTURBED SOILDRAIN TO ACOMMON LOCATION. THE BASIN SIZE IS BASED ON RUNOFF FROM A 2-YEAR, 24 HOURSTORM, FOR EACH ACRE DRAINED TO THE BASIN. AT A MINIMUM, THE BASIN WILL PROVIDE 1800 CUBICFEET OF STORAGE FOR EACH ACRE DRAINED TO THE BASIN.·SEDIMENT BASINS WILL DETAIN WATER LONG ENOUGH TO SETTLE OUT AT LEAST 75 PERCENT OF THESEDIMENT. THE USE OF FLOCS MAY BE NECESSARY. THE DISCHARGE QUALITY SHALL BE EQUAL TO ORBETTER THAN THE RECEIVING WATER. THE TEMPORARY BASIN MAY BE DRAWN DOWN WITH A PUMP TOINCREASE CAPACITY FOR THE NEXT RAIN EVENT. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES REQUIREDDUE TO CONTRACTORS METHOD OF SEQUENCING THEIR CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTALTO THE GRADING CONTRACT.·THE SEDIMENT PONDS WILL BE EXCAVATED TO MAINTAIN THE NECESSARY SEDIMENT CAPACITY ANDCONTAINMENT.··TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FOREBAYS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO CAPTURE SEDIMENT BEFORE IT ENTERSTHE POND, IF·NECESSARY.·THE SEDIMENT PONDS WILL BE MONITORED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE THE SEDIMENT LEVELIN THE POND.·WHEN THE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE TEMPORARY BASIN REACHES ½ FULL (50% OF THESTORAGE VOLUME) THE BASIN SHALL BE DRAINED USING PUMPS AND ENERGY DISSIPATION ANDSEDIMENT REMOVAL SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 72 HOURS OF DISCOVERY OF THE BASIN BEING 1/2FULL OF SEDIMENT, OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS. TEMPORARY EROSIONCONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED DUE TO CONTRACTORS METHOD OF SEQUENCING THEIRCONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT.·TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS WILL HAVE A STABILIZED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW AND CONTAINENERGY DISSIPATION AT BASIN OUTLET.9.DEEP UTILITIES: WATER AND SANITARY/GAS LINE·SILT FENCE OR A SIMILAR TYPE OF PERIMETER CONTROL SHALL BE PLACED DOWN GRADIENT OF THEEXCAVATED SOIL IF WORK IS DONE WITHIN 200 FEET OF WETLANDS OR STREAMS.·DISTURBANCE OF CHANNEL BANKS, WETLANDS, AND IMPORTANT VEGETATION AREAS SHALL BEMINIMIZED TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE.·THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SITE SHALL BE SEEDED WITH A TEMPORARY·SEED MIX AND MULCH AFTER INSTALLATION IF THE SITE WILL BE IDLE FOR 7, 14, OR 21 DAYS DEPENDINGUPON SLOPES OF STEEPER THAN 3:1, 3:1 TO 10:1 AND FLATTER THAN 10:1 RESPECTIVELY.10.STOCKPILES (TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT)·LOCATE STOCKPILES A MINIMUM OF 100 FEET FROM CATCH BASIN INLETS, PONDS, AND SITE DRAINAGEROUTES PERIMETER CONTROLS SUCH AS SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND ALL STOCKPILES IFNOT PLACED WITHIN EXISTING SILT FENCES OR OTHER SEDIMENT CONTROL.·TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH SHALL BE USED TO STABILIZE THE STOCKPILES AND THE STOCKPILESSHALL BE SHAPED TO FACILITATE SEEDING AND MINIMIZE EROSION AND SHALL BE SEEDED WITHIN 7DAYS. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED DUE TO CONTRACTORS METHOD OFSEQUENCING THEIR CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT.·IF TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH CANNOT BE USED, THEN THE STOCKPILES SHALL BE COVERED WITHHYDROMULCH, TARPS OR PLASTIC SHEETING AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER.·IF STOCKPILES MUST BE PLACED WITHIN A CONVEYANCE A TEMPORARY BYPASS SHALL BE INSTALLED(I.E. PVC PIPE) TO ADEQUATELY CONVEY RUNOFF. TEMPORARY BYPASS BMPS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TOTHE CONTRACT UNLESS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY THE OWNER / ENGINEER11.CONSTRUCTION DEWATERING·DURING DEWATERING ACTIVITIES, THE SEDIMENT LADEN WATER CANNOT BE DIRECTLY DISCHARGED TOSURFACE WATERS. OPTIONS FOR REDUCING THE TURBIDITY OF THE WATER INCLUDE:(TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED DUE TO CONTRACTORS METHOD OFSEQUENCING THEIR CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT):1.CONSTRUCT A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP FOR TURBID WATER DISCHARGE.2.USE A PORTABLE SEDIMENT TRAP SYSTEM.3.APPLY NATURAL BASED FLOCCULENT TECHNOLOGY SUCH AS CHITOSAN IN SEDIMENT TRAPS OR ASERIES OF DITCH CHECKS TO CONTAIN SEDIMENT.4.DISCHARGE THROUGH FIBERLOGS OR A ROCK WEEPER INTO A LARGE VEGETATIVE BUFFER AREA.5.PUMP TO A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN.6.ENERGY DISSIPATION WILL BE PROVIDED AT ALL DISCHARGE POINTS.7.DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING ACTIVITIES WILL NOT CAUSE EROSION IN RECEIVING CHANNELS ORADVERSELY IMPACT WETLANDS.8.ALL EROSION CONTROL OR SEDIMENT TRAPS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION DEWATERING SHALL BECONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIRING DEWATERING.12.CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES·A TEMPORARY CRUSHED ROCK OR WOOD CHIP PAD SHALL BE LOCATED WHERE VEHICLES LEAVE THECONSTRUCTION SITE.·THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PAD SHALL BE AT LEAST 50 FEET IN LENGTH.·GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MAY BE PLACED UNDER THE CRUSHED ROCK OR WOOD CHIPS TO PREVENTMIGRATION OF MUD FROM UNDERLYING SOIL INTO THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MATERIAL.·ROCK PADS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF ROCK 1 TO 3 INCHES IN SIZE AND PLACED IN 6 INCH LAYERS.·CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSPECTED AT LEAST EVERY 7 DAYS AND MAINTAINED ASNEEDED.·TRACKED SEDIMENTS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM PAVED SURFACES AT THE END OF EACH DAY USINGPICK-UP TYPE STREET SWEEPER.·IF TRACKING INTO ROADWAY BECOMES PROBLEMATIC THE ENTRANCE PADS SHALL BE LENGTHENED ORANOTHER TECHNIQUE APPLIED. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED DUE TOCONTRACTORS METHOD OF SEQUENCING THEIR CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THEGRADING CONTRACT.·THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE MONITORED CLOSELY DURING WET CONDITIONS. IFTRACKING INTO ADJACENT ROADWAYS OCCURS, THE FREQUENCY OF STREET SWEEPING SHALL BEINCREASED.13.CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT·CONCRETE TRUCKS SHALL UTILIZE THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA SHOWN ON THE PLANS TO WASHAND RINSE THEIR EQUIPMENT PRIOR TO LEAVING THE SITE.·WASHOUT OF CONCRETE MIXER TRUCKS WILL BE PERFORMED IN THE DESIGNATED AREAS ONLY.·WASHOUTS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT CONTAINMENT FOR ALLLIQUID AND CONCRETE WASTE GENERATED BY WASHOUT OPERATIONS.·WASHOUTS SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED ON SITE WITH SIGNAGE BY THE UTILITY CONTRACTOR WITHAPPROVAL FROM OWNER.·WASHOUTS SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 50 FEET FROM DRAINAGE FACILITIES ANDWATERCOURSES.·CONCRETE WASHOUT AREAS WILL HAVE AN IMPERMEABLE LINER TO PREVENT CONCRETE WASHOUTWATER FROM INFILTRATING/CONTACTING WITH SOIL.·IMPERMEABLE LINER INCLUDES 10 MIL POLYLINER OR COMPACTED CLAY LINER.·WASHOUT SYSTEMS CAN BE USED AS ALTERNATE WASHOUT AREAS.14.VEHICLE MAINTENANCE·ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OF VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL OCCUR IN STAGING AREAS ONLY.·VEHICLE WASHING SHOULD BE AVOIDED. IF WASHING IS NECESSARY, RUNOFF FROM THE WASHINGWILL BE CONTAINED AND LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. RUNOFF MUST BE CONTAINED ANDWASTE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF·ENGINE DEGREASING SHALL BE AVOIDED. IF DEGREASING IS NECESSARY, RUNOFF FROM THEOPERATION WILL BE CONTAINED IN A LINED SEDIMENT TRAP AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF AT ATREATMENT FACILITY.·ALL REQUIRED SEDIMENT TRAPS AND CONTAINMENT FACILITIES AND PROPER DISPOSAL OF WASHWATER/DEGREASING AT A TREATMENT FACILITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTIONCONTRACT.15.FUELING·ANY FUEL TANK OR TRUCK STORED ON THE PROJECT SITE SHALL BE PROTECTED BY A SECONDARYCONTAINMENT SYSTEM.·FUELING AREAS SHALL NOT BE WASHED OR RINSED WITH WATER SINCE THIS COULD CAUSE FUEL SPILLSTO BE DISCHARGED INTO STORM WATER SYSTEMS.·ABSORBENT MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON SITE FOR USE IN CLEANING UP SMALL SPILLS.·ALL REQUIRED FUEL CONTAINMENT AND CLEAN-UP MATERIALS AND THE PROPER DISPOSAL OF THEMATERIALS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT.16.HAZARDOUS MATERIALS·HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SHALL BE PROPERLY STORED TO PREVENT VANDALISM OR UNAUTHORIZEDACCESS.·CONTAINMENT UNITS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCALREGULATIONS.·MPCA STORING AND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE FOLLOWED FOR ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE.·NO HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SHOULD BE STORED WITHIN 200 FEET OF AN IDENTIFIED CRITICAL AREA.·ABSORBENT MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE FROM THE CONTRACTOR ON SITE FOR USE IN CLEANINGUP SMALL SPILLS.·IF BUILDING MATERIALS, CHEMICALS, OR GENERAL REFUSE IS BEING USED, STORED, DISPOSED OF, OROTHERWISE MANAGED INAPPROPRIATELY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CORRECT SUCH DEFECTS WITHIN24 HOURS OF DETECTION OR NOTIFICATION.·ALL REQUIRED CONTAINMENT / STORAGE UNITS / ABSORBENT MATERIAL AND REQUIRED DISPOSALSHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT.17.CHEMICAL CONTAINMENT·GASOLINE, OIL, PAINT, SOLVENTS, AND OTHER CHEMICALS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION ARE NOTALLOWED TO CONTACT THE GROUND SURFACE, BE EXPOSED TO GROUNDWATER OR BE RELEASED TOA SURFACE OR GROUNDWATER EXCEPT IN DE MINIMIS QUANTITIES.·ALL PRODUCTS SHALL BE KEPT IN THEIR ORIGINAL CONTAINER, WITH ORIGINAL LABELS STILL ATTACHED,UNLESS THE CONTAINER IS NOT RESEALABLE.·HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STORAGE AREA AT THEEND OF EACH DAY.·AN EFFORT SHOULD BE MADE TO STORE ONLY ENOUGH PRODUCTS TO DO THE REQUIRED JOB.·THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TANKS OR BARRELS TO COLLECT LIQUID BYPRODUCTS THAT POSE APOLLUTION HAZARD.·THE POLLUTANTS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE ON A WEEKLY BASIS AND DISPOSED OF INACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.·ALL SPILLS SHALL BE CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY AFTER DISCOVERY, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEMANUFACTURE'S RECOMMENDED METHODS.·ALL REQUIRED CONTAINMENT / STORAGE UNITS / ABSORBENT MATERIAL AND REQUIRED DISPOSALSHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT·ALL STORAGE AREAS SHALL BE SECURED TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS.18.SOLID WASTE·SOLID WASTE SHALL BE STORED IN APPROPRIATE CONTAINERS AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF ON AREGULAR BASIS.·CONTAINERS SHALL BE COVERED TO PREVENT WIND BLOWING THE WASTE AROUND THE SITE.·MPCA DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS WILL BE FOLLOWED FOR ALL SOLID WASTE.·SOLID WASTE STORAGE CONTAINERS AND PROPER DISPOSAL SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TOTHE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT.19.DUST CONTROL·THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE A VARIETY OF DUST CONTROL INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THEFOLLOWING:·RAPID STABILIZATION METHODS ON SLOPES·WATER ON ROADWAYS AND GRADED AREAS·ALTERNATIVES: IN THE FORM OF VEGETABLE POLYMERS, WATER AND CALCIUM CHLORIDE PETROLEUMEMULSION RESINS, OR ACRYLIC COPOLYMERS MAY ALSO BE USED.·ALL REQUIRED DUST CONTROL SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AS PERSPECIFICATIONS.20.WINTER STABILIZATION·COVER EXPOSED SOILS ON OR AROUND NOV. 15TH AND/OR PRIOR TO TERMINATION OFCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES FOR WINTER·ALL EXPOSED SOILS TO BE COVERED WITH 2 TONS TYPE 1 MULCH·ALL EXPOSED SOILS TO BE SEEDED WITH MNDOT SEED MIX 150·ALL LOW POINTS IN ROADS TO BE ADEQUATELY DRAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NPDES DEWATERINGREQUIREMENTS PART IV. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS. SECTION D. DEWATERING ANDBASIN DRAINING.·PERIMETER SILT FENCE OR OTHER CONTROLS TO BE INSTALLED 3-5 FEET FROM THE BACK OF THE CURBAND OUT OF THE PLOWED SNOW AREA.·PERIMETER CONTROLS AROUND PERMANENT STORMWATER BASINS TO BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED·INLET CONTROLS TO BE REMOVED ACCORDING TO LEGAL REQUIREMENTS WITH DOCUMENTATIONWITHIN 72 HOURS FROM LEGAL AUTHORITY.·IF WORK HAS OCCURRED NEAR OR IN STREAMS OR OTHER SURFACE WATERS, THE EXPOSED SOILSSHALL BE STABILIZED TO PROTECT AGAINST FLOODING AND SPRING RUNOFF TO THE 100-YR FLOODELEVATION.·ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATER BASINS AND SEDIMENT BASINS SHOULD HAVEOUTLETS AND STABILIZED EMERGENCY OVERFLOWS INSTALLED AS PER THE GRADING AND/OR UTILITYPLAN AND AT THE APPROVAL OF THE OWNER.21.NON-STORMWATER DEWATERING·HYDRANT FLUSHING: FLUSHING OF HYDRANTS WILL BE DISCHARGED·THROUGH TEMPORARY PIPES AS NECESSARY, ONTO IMPERVIOUS SURFACES OR TO STABILIZED ARESWITH ENERGY DISSIPATION AT THE DISCHARGE POINT. THE DISCHARGE SHOULD BE COLLECTED BY THESTORM WATER BASINS AND STORM SEWER SYSTEM.·POTABLE WATER DISCHARGE: ALL WATER LINES WILL BE FLUSHED USING HOSES AND DISCHARGEDONTO AN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AND DIRECTED TO THE STORM SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE BYNON-EROSIVE MEANS.22.WORK NEAR OR IN IMPAIRED WATERS·EXPOSED SOILS MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF ACTIVITY TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLYCEASED.·TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN NEEDED WITHIN AREAS 5 ACRE DISTURBANCE WITH COMMON POINT OFDISCHARGE.·IF WORK IS NEAR SPECIAL WATERS REFER TO APPENDIX A OF THE NPDES PERMIT FOR ADDITIONALNOTES AND REQUIREMENTS.·NO UNTREATED DEWATERING WILL TAKE PLACE AND DISCHARGE TO "IMPAIRED WATERS"·SEE PERMIT FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS23.INFILTRATION/FILTRATION AREAS·FENCE OFF AREA PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.·EXCAVATION AREA SHALL TAKE PLACE AFTER CONTRIBUTING AREAS ARE AT FINAL GRADE ANDSTABILIZED.·DO NOT USE HEAVY/WHEELED EQUIPMENT IN FILTRATION AREA.·DIVERSIONS, REDUNDANT SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROLS MUST BE USED TO PROTECT AREA.·ENSURE 8 FT MAINTENANCE ACCESS IS ADEQUATE FOR AREA.·IF GRADING MUST OCCUR IN FILTRATION AREA, LEAVE GRADE 3 FT HIGH TEMPORARILY UNTIL AREA CANBE FINAL GRADED AND STABILIZED20 DescriptionRev.DateSANTA VERA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04.04.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-100PMJM04/04/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Santa Vera Apartments\CAD\Sheets\SWPPP NARRATIVE & NOTES.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC7.1SWPPP NARRATIVESWPPP NARRATIVETHE SWPPP IS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES)REGULATIONS AS ESTABLISHED BY THE CLEAN WATER ACT. THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY'S CONSTRUCTIONGENERAL PERMIT MN R100001 (CSGP) (EXPIRATION DATE JULY 31, 2023) PROVIDES A FRAME WORK OF REQUIREMENTS FORCOMPLIANCE TO DISCHARGE STORMWATER FROM A CONSTRUCTION SITE.THE SWPPP IS FOR IMPLEMENTATION BY THE OWNER AND OPERATOR, AS LISTED BELOW, AT SANTA VERA APARTMENTS. THIS REPORTSHALL BE ON THE SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE OWNER MUST ALSO KEEP THIS SWPPP ON FILE FOR THREE YEARSAFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION. THE FOLLOWING ARE OUTLINED IN THIS SWPPP:- CONTROL MEASURES FOR STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PRIOR TO AND DURING CONSTRUCTION- CONTROL MEASURES FOR STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION AFTER CONSTRUCTION- SOURCES OF STORMWATER AND NON-STORMWATER POLLUTION- INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE PROCEDURESTHE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN PREPARED FOR SANTA VERA APARTMENTS SHALL BE CONSIDERED PART OF THE SWPPP.PROJECT LOCATIONTHIS DOCUMENT PRESENTS A STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) FOR SANTA VERA APARTMENTS INCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA. THE SITE IS LOCATED ON 3.85 ACRES NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF SANTA VERA DRIVE AND LAREDODRIVE.PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATIONOWNER/DEVELOPER: HEADWATERS DEVELOPMENTOWNER ADDRESS:6757 KARMEN AVENUEALBERTVILLE, MNOWNER EMAIL:RYAN@HEADWATERSDEVELOPMENT.COMCONTRACTOR: TBDCOMPANY NAME: TBDIDENTIFY PERSONNEL INVOLVED WITH THE PROJECT AND THEIR RELATED NECESSARY TRAINING COMMENSURATE WITH THEIR TASKPRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.SWPPP DESIGNER: MEASURE GROUP, LLCPETER MOREAUPO BOX 10WAYZATA, MN 55391612-440-0934PMOREAU@MEASUREGRP.COMDESIGN OF CONSTRUCTION SWPPP, U OF M 05/31/25SWPPP INSPECTION:TBDBMP INSTALLER:TBDOWNER/OPERATOR RESPONSIBILITIESOWNER·DEVELOPMENT OF SWPPP PRIOR TO APPLICATION/NOI SUBMITTAL.·SUBMIT A COMPLETE AND ACCURATE APPLICATION FORM (NOI)·COMPLIANCE WITH ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT·SWPPP SUBMITTAL FOR 30 DAY REVIEW FOR PROTECT GREATER THAN 50 ACRES & DISCHARGING TO SPECIAL/IMPAIREDWATERS WITHIN 1 MILE OF SITE DISCHARGE.·KEEPING PERMIT COVERAGE UP-TO-DATE (TRANSFER/SUBDIVISION)·SUBMIT NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ALL PERMIT TERMINATION CONDITIONS AS LISTED IN SECTION13 ARE COMPLETE·SUBMIT NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) WITHIN 30 DAYS OF MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF FINAL STABILIZATION·IDENTIFY WHO HAS LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER SYSTEM.·DEVELOP CHAIN OF RESPONSIBILITY WITH ALL OPERATORS TO ENSURE NPDES COMPLIANCE.·IDENTIFY TRAINED PERSONNEL TO DEVELOP THE SWPPP, INSTALL AND MAINTAIN BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, AND OVERSEETHE SWPPP AND CONDUCT INSPECTIONSOPERATOR·COMPLETION OF AN ACCURATE NOI WITH THE OWNER·COMPLIANCE WITH CSGP SECTIONS 3, 4, 6-22, 24 AND ANY APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY INSECTION 23 (MINN. R. 7090)·KEEPING THE PERMIT UP-TO-DATE WITH THE OWNER (PARTIAL, WHOLE, CONTRACTOR, BUILDER, ETC)·COMPLETE AND SIGN APPLICATIONS FOR PERMIT TRANSFER AND MODIFICATION AND NOTICE OF TERMINATION WITH OWNERAS NEEDED.PROJECT DESCRIPTIONTHE SITE IS APPROXIMATELY 3.85 ACRES. CONSTRUCTION WILL CONSIST OF, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO GRADING, XXXXX FILTRATIONBASINS. THE PROPOSED PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT WILL CONSIST OF THE CONSTRUCITON OF A MULTIFAMILY HOUSINGDEVELOPMENT WITH ASSOCIATED BUILDING, PARKING LOT AND UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE.PROJECT AREA = 3.85 ACDISTURBED AREA = XX.XX ACEXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA = XX.XX ACPROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA = XX.XX ACPRE-DEVELOPMENT SITE CONDITIONSSITE IS GENERALLY CONSISTENT WITH TYPE "D" SOILS. THE EXISTING SITE GENERALLY DRAINS FROM NORTHWEST TO THESOUTHEAST.REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT DATED XX/XX/XXXX COMPLETED BY BRAUN INTERTEC.POST-DEVELOPMENT SITE CONDITIONSTHE PROPOSED SITE MAINTAINS THE OVERALL EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS. MOST OF THE SITE DRAINS FROM NORTHWEST TOSOUTHEAST. THE RUNOFF FROM MOST OF THE SITE WILL BE DIRECTED THROUGH STORM SEWER TO THE IN/FILTRATION BASINS.STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN·THE TEMPORARY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN WILL CONSIST OF GUIDELINES SET FORTH IN ITEMS 7 AND 8 OF THE SWPPPNOTES SECTION.·THE PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN WILL CONSIST OF SURFACE DRAINAGE BY CURB AND GUTTER, SWALESAND STORM SEWER PIPE.·THE SITE DRAINAGE WILL BE ROUTED TO PROPOSED STORM SEWER WHICH WILL DISCHARGE TO THE FILTRATION BASIN .·REFER TO THE PROJECT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION REGARDING THE PRE-DEVELOPMENTSITE CONDITIONS, POST-DEVELOPMENT SITE CONDITIONS, AND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS.·THE SITE STORM WATER DETENTION FACILITY WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO MEET OR EXCEED LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERALREQUIREMENTS.·TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S ALONG WITH THE PROCEDURES TO BE USED TOESTABLISHED ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY BMP'S AS NECESSARY FOR SITE CONDITIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE IDENTIFIEDON THE SITE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN PREPARED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROJECT, AND WITHIN THEPROJECT STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN.POTENTIAL STORM WATER POLLUTANTSPOTENTIAL POLLUTANT SOURCES, INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION AND WASTE MATERIALS THAT ARE USED OR STORED AT THE SITE, AREDESCRIBED IN THE SECTION. BY IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE BMPS, THE POTENTIAL POLLUTANT SOURCES ARE NOT REASONABLYEXPECTED TO AFFECT THE STORM WATER DISCHARGES FROM THE SITE.CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, CHEMICALS AND WASTE MATERIALS THAT WILL BE USED OR STORED AT THE SITE:CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCETHE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR SITE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IS AS FOLLOWS:1. INSTALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES (SILT FENCE, BIO-LOGS, ETC.) AND INLET PROTECTION TO EXISTING STRUCTURES ASSHOWN ON PLAN.INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCE AS SHOWN ON PLAN.2. INSTALL STABILIZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.3. CLEAR AND GRUB SITE.4. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL.5. ROUGH GRADE OF SITE.6. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES.7. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND SERVICES.8. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AROUND CATCH BASINS.9. INSTALL STREET SECTION.10. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER.11. INSTALL PAVEMENT.12. INSTALL SMALL UTILITIES (GAS, ELECTRIC, PHONE, CABLE, ETC.)13. FINE GRADE BOULEVARD, LANDSCAPE AREAS, SEED AND MULCH.14. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT.15. FINAL GRADE.16. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED BY EITHER SEED OR SOD AND LANDSCAPING,REMOVE SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL.CONSTRUCTION NOTESIT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT THE CONTRACTOR MAINTAIN A STOCKPILE OF EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND SEDIMENTCONTROL BMP'S ON SITE AT ALL TIMES FOR IMMEDIATE USAGE. IN THE EVENT OF AN ACCIDENTAL SEDIMENT DISCHARGE TOWATERS OF THE STATE, OR ANY DISCHARGE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIAL OF REPORTABLE QUANTITY, CONTACT THE MPCA STATEDUTY OFFICER AT 1-800-422-0798.TIMING OF BMP INSTALLATIONTHE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S SHALL BE INSTALLED TO MINIMIZE EROSION FROM DISTURBED SURFACESAND CAPTURE SEDIMENT ON SITE. THE FOLLOWING LIST DEFINES THE TIMING OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLMEASURES IN SPECIFIC AREAS.PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTIONTHE FOLLOWING EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE SHOWN IN THE PLANS AND SHALL BE IMPLEMENTEDPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION:1. INSTALL SILT FENCE OR OTHER SEDIMENT CONTROL AROUND THE PERIMETER OF AREAS TO BE GRADED AND ALL AREAS WHICH ARENOT TO BE DISTURBED AS SHOWN ON THE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN.2. CONSTRUCT GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AT FIELD ENTRANCES TO THE SITE AS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS.3. INLET PROTECTION IS TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL STORM WATER INLETS WHICH HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO RECEIVE STORM WATERRUNOFF FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE WITHIN 200 FEET OF LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION.4. INSTALL SILT FENCE OR OTHER SEDIMENT CONTROL AROUND ALL TEMPORARY INACTIVE STOCKPILES. ALL SILT FENCES FORSTOCKPILES SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO GRADING CONTRACT IF STOCKPILES ARE PLACED OUTSIDE OF SILT FENCES SHOWN ON THEPLAN.DURING CONSTRUCTIONTHE FOLLOWING EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE SHOWN IN THE PLANS AND SHALL BE IMPLEMENTEDDURING CONSTRUCTION:1. PHASE GRADING WORK TO MINIMIZE THE DURATION THAT ANY DISTURBED SOIL IS EXPOSED.2. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL HAVE TEMPORARY PROTECTION OR PERMANENT COVER OVER EXPOSED SOIL AREAS IF NOT BEINGACTIVELY GRADED AND/OR IF NOT AT FINAL GRADE WITHIN 7 DAYS OF DISTURBANCE ACTIVITY TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLYCEASING. TEMPORARY SEED MIX 22-111, APPLIED AT A RATE OF 30.5 LBS/ACRE, SHALL BE USED PRIOR TO WINTER, IF SITE NOTSODDED.3. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL FOR REPLACEMENT OF 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL OVER TURF AREAS WHEN GRADING IS COMPLETE.4. PLACE A MINIMUM OF 2 TONS/ACRE OF STRAW ON ALL AREAS AFTER REACHING FINAL GRADE WITH TOPSOIL AND ANCHORSTRAW WITH EITHER A STRAIGHT DISK, HYDROMULCH OR POLYMER.5. STABILIZATION OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES THAT DRAIN WATER FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE MUST BEINITIATED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTING THE DRAINAGE DITCH TO ANY CONVEYANCE SYSTEM THAT DISCHARGES TOSURFACE WATERS. THE FIRST 200 LINEAR FEET MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS. THE REMAINING DITCH SHALL BE STABILIZEDWITHIN 7 DAYS.6. INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND ALL TEMPORARY INACTIVE STOCKPILES WHICH ARE NOT PLACED WITHIN EXISTING SILT FENCES OROTHER PERIMETER CONTROLS.7. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION AT PIPE APRON OUTLETS WILL BE PLACED PRIOR TO BUT NO SOONER THAN 7DAYS BEFORE APRON IS INSTALLED. RIPRAP SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDER APRON LIP ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD DETAIL.8. SUFFICIENT PERSONNEL, EQUIPMENT, AND MATERIALS SHALL BE MOBILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A WRITTEN ORDER BY THEOWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE TO CONDUCT CORRECTIVE WORK AND INSTALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL WORK INTHE CASE OF AN EMERGENCY.9. REMOVE ANY SEDIMENT THAT HAS BEEN TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC STREETS AT THE END OF THE DAY OR WITHIN 24 HOURS OFDETECTION, OR MORE FREQUENT AT DIRECTION OF SITE INSPECTOR.10. COLLECT ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS IN DUMPSTERS AND ROLL-OFF BOXES, EMPTY WHEN DEBRIS REACHES TOP OF DUMPSTER11. INSPECT POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES AS SPECIFIED WITHIN SECTION 11 OF THE GENERAL PERMIT.INLET SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP REMOVALIF INLET SEDIMENT CONTROLS (WIMCO TYPE OR EQUAL) BMP'S ARE REMOVED FOR FLOODING / FREEZING CONCERNS UPONREQUEST OF THE MUNICIPALITY, WATERSHED DISTRICT OR OTHER AGENCY, DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THEINSPECTION REPORTS AND THIS SWPPP OR BEAVAILABLE WITHIN 72 HOURS OF REQUEST. DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE A WRITTEN FORM OF CORRESPONDENCE VERIFYING THENEED FOR REMOVAL.UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIESPERMIT TERMINATION CONDITIONS ARE ACHIEVED FOR THE PROJECT WHEN PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL BMP'S ARE APPLIED TOTHE SITE. THE PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL BMP'S MAY BE A COMBINED OF VEGETATIVE AND NON-VEGETATIVE COVER TYPES.ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS TO ACHIEVING FINAL STABILIZATION PERMIT TERMINATION CONDITIONS INCLUDE:1. ALL SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. ALL DISTURBED AREA WITHOUT PERMANENT IMPERMEABLE SURFACES AREVEGETATED FOR FINAL STABILIZATION.2. PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM (IF REQUIRED) IS CONSTRUCTED AND ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT HAS BEENREMOVED FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. CLEAN OUT ALL SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCES AND FROM TEMPORARY SEDIMENTBASINS THAT ARE TO BE USED AS PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BASINS. THE CLEAN OUT OF PERMANENT BASINS MUSTBE SUFFICIENT TO RETURN THE BASIN TO DESIGN CAPACITY.3. THE VEGETATIVE COVER FOR THE SITE IS AT A DENSITY, WITH UNIFORM PERENNIAL COVER OF 70% OF THE EXPECTED FINALGROWTH DENSITY.4. ALL TEMPORARY, SYNTHETIC BMP'S HAVE BEEN REMOVED.PERMANENT VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENTPERMANENT TURF SHALL FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATIONS PER NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS IN THE GRADING AND/OR LANDSCAPEPLAN. SEED THAT IS TO OCCUR AFTER OCTOBER 20TH SHALL CONFORM TO THE MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS FOR DORMANT SEEDING.SWPPP INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL INSPECTIONSCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND ALL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES MUST BE INSPECTED (USING MPCA CONSTRUCTION STORMWATERINSPECTION CHECKLIST OR AN ALTERNATIVE FORM) WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE SCHEDULE BELOW. THE INSPECTOR SHALL BEA PERSON TRAINED AND FAMILIAR WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SWPPP AND THE MPCA MN R100001 PERMIT. ALTERNATES WILLINCLUDE INDIVIDUALS TO BE DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER AND MAY INCLUDE CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL OR OTHER QUALIFIEDINDIVIDUALS AND SHALL BE LISTED IN THE PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATION SECTION OF THIS PLANINSPECTION SCHEDULE:- IF THE SITE IS ACTIVE: INSPECTION NEEDED ONCE EVERY 7 CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A RAINFALL GREATER THAT0.5 INCHES.- INACTIVE AND STABILIZED AREAS: INSPECTION NEEDED ONCE EVERY 30 CALENDAR DAYS.- INACTIVE AREAS WITH FINAL STABILIZATION: INSPECTION NEEDED ONCE EVERY MONTH FOR 12 MONTHS (NOT INCLUDING FROZENCONDITIONS).- SUBJECT TO WINTER/FROZEN CONDITIONS: NOT APPLICABLE/NOT NEEDED IF NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS OCCURRING.SCOPE OF INSPECTION SHALL INCLUDE:1. RECORD DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTION2. NAME OF PERSON(S) CONDUCTING INSPECTION3. FINDINGS OF THE INSPECTION4. LOCATION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS NEEDED5. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (DATE.TIME/BY WHOM)6. DATE AND AMOUNT OF RAINFALL (RAINFALL AMOUNTS TO BE TAKEN FROM AN ONSITE RAIN GAUGE)7. OBSERVED DISCHARGES LOCATIONS8. DESCRIBE DISCHARGE (COLOR, ODOR, FLOATING. SETTLED, SOLIDS, FOAM, OIL SHEEN)9. THE SITE INSPECTOR WILL VISUALLY CHECK A DISCHARGE FROM A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASIN TO ENSUREADEQUATE TREATMENT IS OBTAINED AND DISCHARGE WATER WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE EXCESSIVE SEDIMENT OR OTHER NUISANCECONDITIONS.10. RECORD CHANGES MADE TO THE SWPPP. AMENDMENTS FROM INSPECTIONS NEED TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN 7 DAYS.11. ALL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE DOCUMENTED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER COMPLETING THE FIELD INSPECTION AND AVAILABLE IN PAPEROR ELECTRONIC FORM ON SITE.MAINTENANCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICESTHE OWNER/CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT WATER QUALITYMANAGEMENT BMPS AS WELL AS ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS, FOR THE DURATION OF THECONSTRUCTION WORK AT THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST INSPECT ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPSAND POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE INTEGRITY AND EFFECTIVENESS DURING ALL ROUTINE AND POSTRAINFALL EVENTS. ALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS MUST BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, OR SUPPLEMENTED WITH FUNCTIONAL BMPS BY THEEND OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY, OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS UNLESS ANOTHER TIMEFRAME IS SPECIFIED BELOW.THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES WILL BE USED TO DETERMINE IF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES REQUIREMAINTENANCE, REPAIR, OR REPLACEMENT:1. ALL NON-FUNCTIONAL BMPS - OBSERVED CONDITION; SEDIMENT OVERTOPPING, UNDER WATER, SCOURED ENDS, UNDERMINED,DESTROYED, NON-FUNCTION AS DESIGNED, ETC. - SHALL BE MAINTAINED OR REPLACED BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAYAFTER DISCOVERY OR NOTIFICATION, OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW.2. PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL (SILT FENCE, FIBER LOGS, BERMS, ETC.) - OBSERVED CONDITION TO BE 1/2 FULL OF SEDIMENT,FLATTENED TO 12 HEIGHT, DRIVEN OVER, UNDERMINED, SCOURED, MOVED FOR ACCESS, ETC. - SHALL BE MAINTAINED, REPAIRED ORSUPPLEMENTATION OF PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL SHOULD BE DONE BY THE END OF NEXT BUSINESS DAY OR AD FIELDCONDITIONS ALLOW.3. INLET PROTECTION BMPS, CONVEYANCES, SURFACE WATERS - OBSERVED CONDITION; SEDIMENT DEPOSITION, SEDIMENT DELTASAN ACCUMULATION OF SEDIMENT MATERIAL, DEVICES APPEAR PLUGGED WITH SEDIMENT - REMOVAL/CLEAN OUT OFACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DELTAS TO BE REMOVED WITHIN 7 DAYS, STABILIZE AS NEEDED IF SOILS ARE EXPOSED DURINGREMOVAL/CLEAN OUT.4. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS AND TRAPS/PERMANENT SEDIMENT BASINS - OBSERVED TO HAVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITION ANDACCUMULATION TO 1/2 OF THE STORAGE VOLUME - CLEAN OUT, REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT MATERIAL WITHIN 7 DAYS OFOBSERVATION, OR AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS.5. SITE EXIT LOCATIONS, ROCK EXIT PADS, OTHER ANTI-TRACKING PRACTICES - OBSERVED TO HAVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT INROCK OR OTHER ANTI-TRACKING BMP, TRACKING OF SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE ONTO PAVED SURFACES - TOP DRESS ROCK,MAINTAIN ROCK EXIT OR OTHER ANTI-TRACKING CONTROLS, SCRAP PAVED SURFACES, SWEEP PAVED SURFACES WITHIN 1CALENDAR DAY OF DISCOVERY.6. PAVED SURFACES AND ADJACENT STREETS - OBSERVED TO BE TRACKED WITH SEDIMENT AND SOIL MATERIAL FRO THE SITEHAULING OR ACCESS -SWEEP WITHIN 1 CALENDAR DAY OF DISCOVERY, ADDITIONAL AND/OR MORE FREQUENT SWEEPING MAY BENEEDED TO MAINTAIN PUBLIC SAFETYOR PREVENT WASHING FROM FORECASTED RAINS.7. STREET SWEEPING IS REQUIRED ONE TIME PER WEEK AND AFTER RAINFALL OR MORE FREQUENTLY IF DIRECTED BY CITY ENGINEER.TERMINATION OF COVERAGETHE PROJECT PERMIT MAY BE TERMINATED IN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING SCENARIOS:1. ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE, TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC BMP'S ARE REMOVED, ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROMCONSTRUCTION IS REMOVED, AND PERMANENT COVER HAS BEEN ACHIEVED WITH VEGETATIVE AND/OR NON-VEGETATIVE COVER.THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION FORM FROM THE PCA SHOULD BE COMPLETED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF MEETING THE CONDITIONS ABOVE.UPON MIDNIGHT OF THE POST MARKED DATE, THE PERMIT COVERAGE IS TERMINATED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTIFIED BY THE MPCA.OR:2. WITHIN 30 DAYS OF SELLING OR OTHERWISE LEGALLY TRANSFERRING OWNERSHIP OF THE SITE IN IT'S ENTIRETY (INCLUDING STREETSWEEPING AND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE) FROM THE ORIGINAL OWNER TO ANOTHER PARTY TAKING RESPONSIBILITY OFOWNERSHIP. THE TERMINATION IS EFFECTIVE UPON MIDNIGHT OF THE SUBMISSION DATE OF THE NOT. IF A PORTION OF THE SITE ISTRANSFERRED (I.E. OUTLOTS,LOTS/BLOCKS) THAT PORTION OF THE SITE IS TERMINATED FROM THE ORIGINAL PERMIT COVERAGE ATMIDNIGHT OF THE SUBMISSION DATE. OR:3. PERMIT COVERAGE CAN BE TERMINATED IF ALL OF THE FOLLOWING ARE MET:3.a. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED FOR 90 DAYS; AND3.b. AT LEAST 90% OF THE AREA OF THE ORIGINALLY PROPOSED ACTIVITY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND PERMANENTLY ESTABLISHEDWITH VEGETATION OR NON-VEGETATIVE COVER; AND3.c. WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE, PERMANENT COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED; AND3.d. THE SITE IS COMPLIANT WITH PERMIT SECTIONS 13.3 THROUGH 13.7.4. WHERE THE PROJECT OBTAINED PERMIT COVERAGE BUT NEVER STARTED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY DUE TO CANCELLATION OROTHER REASONS, DOCUMENTATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE MPCA WITH THE NOT FORM AND IS SUBJECT TO MPCA APPROVAL.POTENTIAL POLLUTANTLOCATIONCONTROL MEASUREANTIFREEZEVARIOUSSECONDARY CONTAINMENT/DRIP PANDIESEL FUELVARIOUSSECONDARY CONTAINMENT/DRIP PANFERTILIZERLANDSCAPE CONTRACTORSECONDARY CONTAINMENTGASOLINEIN EQUIPMENT/FUELING AREASECONDARY CONTAINMENT/DRIP PANGLUE/ADHESIVESCONTRACTORSECONDARY CONTAINMENTHYDRAULIC OILCONTRACTORSECONDARY CONTAINMENTPAINTSCONTRACTORSECONDARY CONTAINMENTGREASECONTRACTORSECONDARY CONTAINMENT/DRIP PANSANITARY WASTEPORTABLE BATHROOMSSERVICE PROVIDER TO SECURE UNITS FROM TIPPINGSOIL AMENDMENTSLANDSCAPE CONTRACTORSECONDARY CONTAINMENTCONCRETETRUCK WASHOUTWASHOUT AREACONCRETE/MORTARMOBILE MIXERS.C / WASHOUT AREASWPPP BMP QUANTITIESSILT FENCE X,XXX LFBIO-ROLL XXXX LFINLET PROTECTION X EACHCULVERT PROTECTION X EACHTEMPORARY SEED MIX (22-111) XX LBSPERMANENT SEED MIX (25-131) XXX LBSSOD XXXX SFMULCH X TONEROSION CONTROL BLANKET XXXXX SFROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE X EACHSTREET SWEEPINGX EACH21 DescriptionRev.DateSANTA VERA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04.04.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-100PMJM04/04/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Santa Vera Apartments\CAD\Sheets\CIVIL DETAILS.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC8.0CIVIL DETAILS -UTILITY DETAILS1C8.02C8.03C8.04C8.05C8.06C8.07C8.022 DescriptionRev.DateSANTA VERA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04.04.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-100PMJM04/04/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Santa Vera Apartments\CAD\Sheets\CIVIL DETAILS.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC8.1CIVIL DETAILS -STORM SEWERDETAILS1C8.12C8.13C8.14C8.1Size to Project Requirements18" Max Ponding Depth,Draining in Max 48 Hours>/= 30" Bioretention Soilw/ Iron-Enhancements per MPCA (5% min.)Drainage Layer3' Min Depth to Bedrock/Groundwater2" Choker Course2"2"Bioretention PlantsTo OutletNon-Compacted Subgrade#57 Stone, Pipe width + 2" Above and Below PipePerforated PipeSee Stormwater Manual for Subgrade Preparation3" MulchMax 3H:1L Slope, typ.BIO-FILTRATION BASIN CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING1.Install appropriate temporary erosion control devices toprevent sediment from leaving or entering the practice duringconstruction.2.All down-gradient perimeter sediment control bmp's must be inplace before any up gradient land disturbing activity begins.3.Perform continuous inspections of erosion control practices,especially after each rainfall event.4.Install all utilities (water, sanitary sewer, electric, natural gas,phone, fiber optic, etc) prior to setting final grade ofbioretention device.5.Rough grade the site. If bioretention areas are being used astemporary sediment basins during construction, leave aminimum of 1 feet of cover over the practice to protect theunderlying soils from clogging.6.Complete, stabilize, and vegetate all other site improvements.7.Construct and vegetate bioretention device followingstabilization of contributing drainage area. Ensure that criticalelevations, such as underdrain invert, top of media, top ofmulch, and invert of overflow structure (if present) are correct.8.Remove temporary erosion control devices after thecontributing drainage area is adequately vegetated.GENERAL NOTES1.In the event that sediment is introduced into the bmp during or immediately following excavation, this material shall be removedfrom the practice prior to continuing construction.2.See Minnesota Stormwater Manual for subgrade preparation.MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS1.See Minnesota Stormwater Manual for material specifications recommendations for bioretention soil, mulch, underdrains, etc.5C8.1BIOFILTRATION BASIN WITH UNDERDRAIN AT BOTTOMNOT TO SCALECleanout>/= 30" Bioretention Soil w/ Iron-Enhancements per MPCA (5% min.)Solid Pipe3" Mulch2" Choker Course, #8, #78, or #89 StoneTransition from Solid to Perforated PipeOVERFLOW STRUCTURE(SEE DETAIL 4/C8.1)23 DescriptionRev.DateSANTA VERA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04.04.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-100PMJM04/04/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Santa Vera Apartments\CAD\Sheets\CIVIL DETAILS.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC8.2CIVIL DETAILS -STORM SEWERDETAILSREVE7001-110-042DWG NO.1 OF 1SHEET1:40SCALEDWG SIZEA3130 VERONA AVEBUFORD, GA 30518PHN (770) 932-2443FAX (770) 932-2490www.nyloplast-us.com8 IN - 36 IN TYPICAL INSTALLATION OPTIONSTITLEPROJECT NO./NAMEMATERIALDATEREVISED BY8-10-00DATEAWADRAWN BYTHIS PRINT DISCLOSES SUBJECT MATTER IN WHICHNYLOPLAST HAS PROPRIETARY RIGHTS. THE RECEIPTOR POSSESSION OF THIS PRINT DOES NOT CONFER,TRANSFER, OR LICENSE THE USE OF THE DESIGN ORTECHNICAL INFORMATION SHOWN HEREINREPRODUCTION OF THIS PRINT OR ANY INFORMATIONCONTAINED HEREIN, OR MANUFACTURE OF ANYARTICLE HEREFROM, FOR THE DISCLOSURE TO OTHERSIS FORBIDDEN, EXCEPT BY SPECIFIC WRITTENPERMISSION FROM NYLOPLAST.11-2-18NMHDUCTILE IRONDO NOT POLLUTE DRAINS TO WATERWAYSNYLOPLASTTSALPOLYNDUCTILEIRONTSALPOLYNDUCTILEIRON DUCTILE IRON DO NOT POLLUTE DRAINS TO WATERWAYS NYLOPLAST WHEN ARE DRAIN BASINS USED?2808AG _ _ X2810AG _ _ X2812AG _ _ X2815AG _ _ X2818AG _ _ X2824AG _ _ X2830AG _ _ X2836AG _ _ XWHEN ARE INLINE DRAINS USED?2708AG _ _ X2710AG _ _ X2712AG _ _ X2715AG _ _ X2718AG _ _ X2724AG _ _ X2730AG _ _ XTYPICAL INSTALLATIONSTYPICAL INSTALLATION OF NYLOPLASTDRAIN BASIN AND INLINE DRAIN1: TO ENTER AN EXISTING LINE USING A TEE & RISER2: AT THE BEGINNING OF A DRAIN LINE USING AN ELBOW & RISERTEEELBOW12" DRAIN BASIN(2) INLET & OUTLETADAPTERS CAN BEPUT ON ANY ANGLE1: TO CHANGE ELEVATION2: TO CHANGE PIPE DIAMETER3: TO CHANGE PIPE TYPE4: FOR SHALLOWAPPLICATIONS5: TO CHANGE DIRECTIONA°RISERDRAIN BASININLINE DRAIN10" INLINE DRAIN10" INLINE DRAIN(3) VARIABLE ELEVATIONWATERTIGHT ADAPTERS AVAILABLEFOR MOST COMMON PLASTIC PIPING SYSTEMS8"6"CORRUGATEDHDPE PIPESMOOTH WALLPVC1 - STRUCTURES & ADAPTERS AVAILABLE IN SIZES 8" - 36"2 - ADAPTERS CAN BE MOUNTED ON ANY ANGLE 0° TO 360°, TO DETERMINE MINIMUM ANGLE BETWEEN ADAPTERS SEE DRAWING NO. 7001-110-0123 - DRAIN BASIN TO BE CUSTOM MANUFACTURED ACCORDING TO PLAN DETAILS RISERS ARE NEEDED FOR BASINS OVER 84" DUE TO SHIPPING RESTRICTIONS SEE DRAWING NO. 7001-110-0654 - REDUCING CONES DOWN TO 30" DIAMETER WILL BE REQUIRED FOR 36" DRAIN BASINS.©2010 NYLOPLAST1C8.22C8.24C8.2REVF7001-110-111DWG NO.1 OF 1SHEET1:25SCALEDWG SIZEA3130 VERONA AVEBUFORD, GA 30518PHN (770) 932-2443FAX (770) 932-2490www.nyloplast-us.comDRAIN BASIN & INLINE DRAIN NON TRAFFIC INSTALLATIONTITLEPROJECT NO./NAMEMATERIALDATEREVISED BY9-30-99DATECJADRAWN BYTHIS PRINT DISCLOSES SUBJECT MATTER IN WHICHNYLOPLAST HAS PROPRIETARY RIGHTS. THE RECEIPTOR POSSESSION OF THIS PRINT DOES NOT CONFER,TRANSFER, OR LICENSE THE USE OF THE DESIGN ORTECHNICAL INFORMATION SHOWN HEREINREPRODUCTION OF THIS PRINT OR ANY INFORMATIONCONTAINED HEREIN, OR MANUFACTURE OF ANYARTICLE HEREFROM, FOR THE DISCLOSURE TO OTHERSIS FORBIDDEN, EXCEPT BY SPECIFIC WRITTENPERMISSION FROM NYLOPLAST.03-11-16NMHDRAIN BASININLINE DRAINTHE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE OR OTHERGRANULAR MATERIAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS I,CLASS II, OR CLASS III MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321.BEDDING & BACKFILL FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BEPLACED & COMPACTED UNIFORMLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321.NON TRAFFIC INSTALLATIONTOP SOILGRATE/COVERTOP SOILGRATE/COVER©2011 NYLOPLAST4" MIN ON 8" - 24"6" MIN ON 30" & 36"THE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE OR OTHERGRANULAR MATERIAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS I,CLASS II, OR CLASS III MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321.BEDDING & BACKFILL FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BEPLACED & COMPACTED UNIFORMLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321.REVD7003-110-057DWG NO.1 OF 1SHEET1:40SCALEDWG SIZEA3130 VERONA AVEBUFORD, GA 30518PHN (770) 932-2443FAX (770) 932-2490www.nyloplast-us.comINLINE DRAIN WITH DOME GRATEQUICK SPEC INSTALLATION DETAILTITLEPROJECT NO./NAMEMATERIALDATEREVISED BY03-25-10DATEEBCDRAWN BY03-15-16NMHMINIMUM PIPE BURIALDEPTH PER PIPEMANUFACTURERRECOMMENDATIONINVERT ACCORDING TOPLANS/TAKE OFFNYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN WITH DOME GRATE8" - 30"1 - 8" - 30" DOME GRATES SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PER ASTM A536 GRADE 70-50-05.2 - DRAINAGE CONNECTION STUB JOINT TIGHTNESS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM D3212 FOR CORRUGATED HDPE (ADS N-12/HANCOR DUAL WALL), N-12 HP, & PVC SEWER (4" - 24").3 - 8" - 30" DOME GRATES HAVE NO LOAD RATING(3) VARIOUS TYPES OF INLET & OUTLET ADAPTERSAVAILABLE: 4" - 30" FOR CORRUGATED HDPE(ADS N-12/HANCOR DUAL WALL, ADS/HANCORSINGLE WALL), N-12 HP, PVC SEWER (EX: SDR 35),PVC DWV (EX: SCH 40), PVC C900/C905,CORRUGATED & RIBBED PVCWATERTIGHT JOINT(CORRUGATED HDPE SHOWN)THIS PRINT DISCLOSES SUBJECT MATTER IN WHICHNYLOPLAST HAS PROPRIETARY RIGHTS. THE RECEIPTOR POSSESSION OF THIS PRINT DOES NOT CONFER,TRANSFER, OR LICENSE THE USE OF THE DESIGN ORTECHNICAL INFORMATION SHOWN HEREINREPRODUCTION OF THIS PRINT OR ANY INFORMATIONCONTAINED HEREIN, OR MANUFACTURE OF ANYARTICLE HEREFROM, FOR THE DISCLOSURE TO OTHERSIS FORBIDDEN, EXCEPT BY SPECIFIC WRITTENPERMISSION FROM NYLOPLAST.©2013 NYLOPLAST(1) INTEGRATED DUCTILE IRONGRATE TO MATCH BASIN O.D.THE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE OR OTHERGRANULAR MATERIAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS I,CLASS II, OR CLASS III MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321.BEDDING & BACKFILL FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BEPLACED & COMPACTED UNIFORMLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321.3C8.224 DescriptionRev.DateSANTA VERA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04.04.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-100PMJM04/04/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Santa Vera Apartments\CAD\Sheets\CIVIL DETAILS.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC8.3CIVIL DETAILS -SITE DETAILS1C8.32C8.33C8.34C8.35C8.36C8.325 DescriptionRev.DateSANTA VERA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04.04.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-100PMJM04/04/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Santa Vera Apartments\CAD\Sheets\CIVIL DETAILS.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC8.4CIVIL DETAILS -ADA DETAILS1C8.42C8.43C8.44C8.426 DescriptionRev.DateSANTA VERA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04.04.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-100PMJM04/04/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Santa Vera Apartments\CAD\Sheets\CIVIL DETAILS.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:Sheet:XX.XX.XXN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.53735Peter S Moreau, PEC8.5CIVIL DETAILS-ADA DETAILS-CONTINUED1C8.51C8.527 ||||||||||606050 5050XXXXX X8" METAL GMEMGMDeckSIGN "STOP"SIGN "STOP"SIGN "NO PARKING"SARATOGA DRIVELAREDO DRIVE SANTAVERA DRIVEBITUMINOUS TRAIL BITUMINOUS TRAILBITUMINOUS PARKING LOTSIGN "15MPH"4' WOODRET. WALLTTCHAIN LINKFENCECABXSATELLITE DISHCABX10 1010101010101010 10 10 10 101010SAN SEWER (PER GSOC)WATER 6" DIP (PER GSOC & PLAN)50 DELRIODRIVE50 PORTABLESHEDCABXROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)WOODBENCHESFIRE PITWOOD MULCHCONCRETESTAIRSROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)GRAVEL LOTNO PARKINGDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONSTSTSTSS#111-20" ash#113-10" spruce#114-28" maple#116-60" basswood, multi-stem#117-30" maple#1-boxelder, 3-stem(8,8,8)#2-13" boxelder#5-poplar, 2-stem(15,13)#3-boxelder, 3-stem(8,8,4)#6-poplar, 4-stem(20,20,20,10)#8-13" poplar#22-poplar, 2-stem(20,16)#23-poplar, 2-stem(24,12)#24-poplar, 2-stem(20,20)#25-poplar, 2-stem(10,6)#110-16" pine#109-30" maple#108-22" maple#107-26" maple#106-14" pine#4-boxelder, 4-stem(10,8,6,5)#12-10" boxelder#112-22 maple#105-22" pine#104-15" pine#102-14" pine#101-15" ash#100-14" ash#98-20" spruce#99-18" maple#103-16" pine#97-15" spruce#96-20" mapleSSHH#86-50" cottonwood#85-20" cottonwood#84-16" boxelder#83-14" boxelder#81-11" boxelder#82-20" crabapple#87-12" maple#88-ash, 2-stem(8,8)#89-22" maple#90 15" maple#91-16" maple#95-48" maple#94-18" maple#93-15" maple#92-15" maple#131-10" red cedar#133-12" cottonwood#132-10" red cedar#79-15" crabapple#80-12" crabapple#78-boxelder, 4-stem(8,8,6,6)#126-11" cottonwood#125-10" elm#124-10" red cedar#123-14" cottonwood#122-10 cottonwood#121-30" cottonwood#120-18" cottonwood#119-10" cottonwood#118-28" maple#26-poplar, 3-stem(20,14,14)#27-20" poplar#28-24" poplar#29-14" poplar#33-11" poplar#32-20" poplar#30-30" poplar#31-poplar, 2-stem(14,14)#7-18" poplar#9-boxelder, 2-stem(10,8)#10-poplar, 2-stem(42,13)#11-35' spruce#16-20" poplar#14-11" boxelder#13-60" cottonwood#15-11" boxelder#20-10" boxelder#19-26" poplar#18-24" poplar#17-24" poplar#37-10" boxelder#35-10" boxelder#36-10" boxelder#34-10" boxelderHYD TNH996.69CSSSSSMHRE=993.60INV=983.83 NEINV=983.86 SW (ORIFICE, NO PIPE)SS#48-10" boxelder#41-10" boxelder#21-boxelder, 3-stem(10,10,10)#38-10" boxelder#39-36" poplar#40-36" poplar#42-10" boxelder#43-14" boxelder#44-16" boxelder#51-11" boxelder#52-10" boxelder#53-12" boxelder#54-11" boxelder#55-10" ash#45-11" boxelder#47-14" boxelder#46-10" boxelder#49-11" boxelder#50-silver maple, 5-stem(12,12,9,6,4)#59-10" maple#60-silver maple, 4-stem(18,16,10,8)#70-26" silver maple#58-10 ash#56-10" ash#57-10" ash#61-basswood, 4-stem(8,8,6,4)#63-12" crabapple#62-10" boxelder#64-14" ash#65-10" ash#66-10" ash#67-12" ash#74-10" boxelder#73-14" boxelder#68-silver maple, 3-stem(8,5,4)#69-16" silver maple#71-15" maple#72-15" maple#75-12" elm#76-14" ashGM#127-12" cottonwood#128-cottonwood, 2-stem(10,8)#129-10" maple#130-15" cottonwood#77-15' red cedar8.00N16°56'27"EL=137.87meas.(137.88plat)R=474.00Δ=16°39'56"meas.(16°40'00"plat)N89°43'33"W 78.00N00°16'27"E 513.79N89°11'28"W 174.96N53°31'23"W 254.72N00°20'03"E 252.00 L=219.05R=171.00Δ=73°23'36" 99 0 995 1000 1005 989 991 992993 994 996 997 998 999 1001 1002 1003 1004 990995 989989 9919919919929939949969971000100099799799899899999910011001995991 992993994996995996997995 996997998999990 99 5 991992 993994996HYD L O DLODLODLODLODLODLOD L O D LODLODLODLODLO D LO D LO D LOD LOD LOD LODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLODLOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLOD LODLOD DescriptionRev.DateSANTA VERA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04.04.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-100PMJM04/04/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Santa Vera Apartments\CAD\Sheets\TREE PRESERVATION PLAN.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalLandscape Architect under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.Sheet:XX.XX.XX53234Joshua J McKinney, PLAN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NL0.1TREE PRESERVATIONPLAN - TREEINVENTORYTREE IDENTIFICATIONSCALE IN FEET0603028 606050 5050XXXXX XGMEMGMSIGN "STOP"SIGN "STOP"SIGN "NO PARKING"SARATOGA DRIVELAREDO DRIVE SANTAVERA DRIVEPID: 257620010OWNER: CHANHASSEN CITYBITUMINOUS TRAIL BITUMINOUS TRAILBITUMINOUS PARKING LOTSIGN "15MPH"TTCHAIN LINKFENCECABXCABX10 1010101010101010 10 10 10 10101050 DELRIODRIVE50 CABXROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)WOOD MULCHCONCRETESTAIRSROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)GRAVEL LOTDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONSTSTSTSS#111-20" ash#113-10" spruce#114-28" maple#116-60" basswood, multi-stem#117-30" maple#1-boxelder, 3-stem(8,8,8)#2-13" boxelder#5-poplar, 2-stem(15,13)#3-boxelder, 3-stem(8,8,4)#6-poplar, 4-stem(20,20,20,10)#8-13" poplar#22-poplar, 2-stem(20,16)#23-poplar, 2-stem(24,12)#24-poplar, 2-stem(20,20)#25-poplar, 2-stem(10,6)#110-16" pine#109-30" maple#108-22" maple#107-26" maple#106-14" pine#4-boxelder, 4-stem(10,8,6,5)#12-10" boxelder#112-22 maple#105-22" pine#104-15" pine#102-14" pine#101-15" ash#100-14" ash#98-20" spruce#99-18" maple#103-16" pine#97-15" spruce#96-20" mapleSSHH#86-50" cottonwood#85-20" cottonwood#84-16" boxelder#83-14" boxelder#81-11" boxelder#82-20" crabapple#87-12" maple#88-ash, 2-stem(8,8)#89-22" maple#90 15" maple#91-16" maple#95-48" maple#94-18" maple#93-15" maple#92-15" maple#131-10" red cedar#133-12" cottonwood#132-10" red cedar#79-15" crabapple#80-12" crabapple#78-boxelder, 4-stem(8,8,6,6)#126-11" cottonwood#125-10" elm#124-10" red cedar#123-14" cottonwood#122-10 cottonwood#121-30" cottonwood#120-18" cottonwood#119-10" cottonwood#118-28" maple#26-poplar, 3-stem(20,14,14)#27-20" poplar#28-24" poplar#29-14" poplar#33-11" poplar#32-20" poplar#30-30" poplar#31-poplar, 2-stem(14,14)#7-18" poplar#9-boxelder, 2-stem(10,8)#10-poplar, 2-stem(42,13)#11-35' spruce#16-20" poplar#14-11" boxelder#13-60" cottonwood#15-11" boxelder#20-10" boxelder#19-26" poplar#18-24" poplar#17-24" poplar#37-10" boxelder#35-10" boxelder#36-10" boxelder#34-10" boxelderSS#48-10" boxelder#41-10" boxelder#21-boxelder, 3-stem(10,10,10)#38-10" boxelder#39-36" poplar#40-36" poplar#42-10" boxelder#43-14" boxelder#44-16" boxelder#51-11" boxelder#52-10" boxelder#53-12" boxelder#54-11" boxelder#55-10" ash#45-11" boxelder#47-14" boxelder#46-10" boxelder#49-11" boxelder#50-silver maple, 5-stem(12,12,9,6,4)#59-10" maple#60-silver maple, 4-stem(18,16,10,8)#70-26" silver maple#58-10 ash#56-10" ash#57-10" ash#61-basswood, 4-stem(8,8,6,4)#63-12" crabapple#62-10" boxelder#64-14" ash#65-10" ash#66-10" ash#67-12" ash#74-10" boxelder#73-14" boxelder#68-silver maple, 3-stem(8,5,4)#69-16" silver maple#71-15" maple#72-15" maple#75-12" elm#76-14" ashGM#127-12" cottonwood#128-cottonwood, 2-stem(10,8)#129-10" maple#130-15" cottonwood#77-15' red cedar3 STORYMULTIFAMILY59 UNITSFFE: 1000.00GFE: 989.33HYD DDDINFILTRATIONBASINHWL:992.17BERM:992.00OUT:989.20BOT:988.00BIOFILTRATIONBASINBERM:990.50HWL:989.99LOW RIM:988.50TOP MEDIA:987.00L O DLODLODLODLODLODLOD L O D LODLODLODLODLO D LO D LO D LOD LOD LOD LODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLODLOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLOD LODLOD DescriptionRev.DateSANTA VERA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04.04.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-100PMJM04/04/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Santa Vera Apartments\CAD\Sheets\TREE PRESERVATION PLAN.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalLandscape Architect under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.Sheet:XX.XX.XX53234Joshua J McKinney, PLAN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NL0.2TREE PRESERVATIONPLANLEGENDTREE PROTECTION FENCE DETAILSCALE IN FEET06030TREE PRESERVATION CALCULATIONSSITE AREA:3.85 ACEXISTING SITE TREE COVERAGE AREA1.22 ACEXISTING SITE TREE COVERAGE PERCENTAGE31.6%BASE LINE TREE COVERAGE (PER TABLE 18-61-2b)20%TREE CANOPY ACREAGE TO REMAIN.44 ACTREE CANOPY PERCENTAGE TO REMAIN11.43%TOTAL TREES REQUIRED TO MITIGATE FOR TREE LOSS:20% x 3.85 ACRES = .77 ACRES.77 ACRES - .44 ACRES = .33 ACRES (14,375 SF)14,375 x 2 / 1,089 = 26.427 TREES REQUIRED FOR MITIGATIONMAINTAIN EXISTINGGRADE WITH THE TREEPROTECTION FENCEUNLESS OTHERWISEINDICATED ON THEPLANS.2" X 6' STEEL POSTSOR APPROVED EQUAL.5" THICKLAYER OF MULCH.NOTES:1- LOCATE FENCING PER TREEPROTECTION & EROSION CONTROLPLANS.2- NO PRUNING SHALL BE PERFORMEDEXCEPT BY APPROVED ARBORIST.3- NO EQUIPMENT SHALL OPERATEINSIDE THEPROTECTIVE FENCING INCLUDINGDURING FENCEINSTALLATION AND REMOVAL.SECTION VIEWKEEP OUTTREEPROTECTIONAREATREE PROTECTIONFENCE: 48" HIGH DENSITYPOLYETHYLENE FENCINGWITH 3.5" X 1.5"OPENINGS; COLOR-ORANGE. STEEL POSTSINSTALLED AT 8' O.C.TREE PROTECTION FENCE/ LIMITS OF DISTURBANCETREES TO BE REMOVEDLODEXISTING TREE CANOPYTREE CANOPY TO REMAINTREE CANOPY TO BE REMOVED29 UEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUE UE UE UEUE UE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UEUEUE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UE UEUEUEUE UE UE UE UE U E UEGGGGGG G G G GGGG GGGGGGGGG GGGGGGGGXXXXXXGMEMGM2 STORY FRAME & STUCCO MULTI-UNIT BUILDINGAREA = 9103 SFBLDG #611BLDG #6211 Story Frame & Stucco Garage ComplexArea = 4630 SFCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCOVERED ENTRYCANTILEVERW O O D SH E D SIGN "STOP"SIGN "STOP"SIGN "NO PARKING"SARATOGA DRIVELAREDO DRIVE SANTAVERA DRIVEPID: 257620020OWNER: SANTA VERA APARTMENTS LLCPID: 257620010OWNER: CHANHASSEN CITYBITUMINOUS TRAIL BITUMINOUS TRAILBITUMINOUS PARKING LOTSIGN "15MPH"1' BLOCKRET. WALL1' BLOCKRET. WALL1' BLOCKRET. WALLTTCHAIN LINKFENCE1' BLOCKRET. WALLCABXCABX10 10101010101010101010 10 101010ROOF OVERHANGROOF OVERHANGDELRIODRIVECABXROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)CONCRETE STAIRSW/ HANDRAILWOOD MULCHCONCRETE STAIRSW/ HANDRAILCONCRETESTAIRSROCK MULCH (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)GRAVEL LOTDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONDrainage and Utility Easement perSARATOGA 3RD ADDITIONSS#111-20" ash#113-10" spruce#114-28" maple#116-60" basswood, multi-stem#117-30" maple#110-16" pine#109-30" maple#108-22" maple#107-26" maple#106-14" pine#112-22 maple#105-22" pine#104-15" pine#102-14" pine#101-15" ash#100-14" ash#98-20" spruce#99-18" maple#103-16" pine#97-15" spruce#96-20" mapleSSHH#86-50" cottonwood#85-20" cottonwood#84-16" boxelder#83-14" boxelder#87-12" maple#88-ash, 2-stem(8,8)#89-22" maple#90 15" maple#91-16" maple#95-48" maple#92-15" maple#126-11" cottonwood#118-28" maple#7-18" poplar#14-11" boxelder#13-60" cottonwood#15-11" boxelder#20-10" boxelderSS#41-10" boxelder#21-boxelder, 3-stem(10,10,10)#38-10" boxelder#42-10" boxelder#43-14" boxelder#44-16" boxelder#51-11" boxelder#52-10" boxelder#53-12" boxelder#54-11" boxelder#56-10" ash#57-10" ash#61-basswood, 4-stem(8,8,6,4)#63-12" crabapple#62-10" boxelder#64-14" ash#65-10" ash#66-10" ash#67-12" ash#74-10" boxelder#73-14" boxelder#68-silver maple, 3-stem(8,5,4)#71-15" maple#72-15" mapleGM#127-12" cottonwood#128-cottonwood, 2-stem(10,8)#129-10" mapleAREA : 167713.25 SF3.85 ACRES8.00N16°56'27"EL=137.87meas.(137.88plat)R=474.00Δ=16°39'56"meas.(16°40'00"plat)N89°43'33"W 78.00N00°16'27"E 513.79N89°11'28"W 174.96N53°31'23"W 254.72N00°20'03"E 252.00 L=219.05R=171.00Δ=73°23'36"47.222.546.222.1 46.222 . 2 70.516 . 1 23.514 . 2 16.522 . 517.214 . 1 23.516 . 1 68.822 . 2 46.222.11.0 24 . 0 31.81. 0 8.61. 0 43.24. 0 24.040 . 6 83.624.0 83.04. 0 24.08.631.842.61.048.63 STORYMULTIFAMILY59 UNITSFFE: 1000.00GFE: 989.33HYD DDDINFILTRATIONBASINHWL:992.17BERM:992.00OUT:989.20BOT:988.00BIOFILTRATIONBASINBERM:990.50HWL:989.99LOW RIM:988.50TOP MEDIA:987.0030.04" EDGING(TYP.)4" EDGING(TYP.)4" EDGING(TYP.)4" EDGING(TYP.)1AF27QB22AC8PA25QB27WP1AF21AF23AF22AC5BP26SX210SX233CX10SX26SX29HX13HX8SX5HX11SX11HX20HP13HX45SX216CX5HX5AM5HX7JC9HX15JC3SX25SX29HP15HX7SXDescriptionRev.DateSANTA VERA APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04.04.2025CITY SUBMITTALSheet Title:Project #:Drawn By:Checked By:Issue Date:25-100PMJM04/04/2025G:\Shared Drives\Active Projects\Chanhassen\Headwaters Dev - Santa Vera Apartments\CAD\Sheets\LANDSCAPE PLAN.dwgProject Title: HEADWATERS 6757 KARMEN AVENUE ALBERTVILLE, MN Client:Date: Lic. No.:I hereby certify that this plan,specifications or report wasprepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am aduly licensed ProfessionalLandscape Architect under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.Sheet:XX.XX.XX53234Joshua J McKinney, PLAN O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NL1.0LANDSCAPE PLANLANDSCAPE NOTES1.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/ORELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ONRECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTSTAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEINGEXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONSPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OFDISCREPANCIES.2.ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATER MAIN MATERIAL ANDINSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER CITY REQUIREMENTS, MINNESOTA PLUMBINGCODE, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARDSPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION ANDSANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITYENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA.3.PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARYFEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSED WORK OR VERIFYWITH THE OWNER OR ENGINEER THAT PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMITFEES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISESCALE IN FEET0#####LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTSTREES PLANTEDOVERSTORY TREESCONIFEROUS TREESORNAMENTAL TREESTOTAL TREESPARKING LOT PLANTINGAREA REQUIREMENTREQUIREDPROPOSED272115440LANDSCAPING REQUIRED:·27 TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR MITIGATION- SEE L0.1·LANDSCAPING MUSE MEET 1% OF PROJECT BUDGET (Sec. 20-1179)·8% MINIMUM PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE AREA (20-1181)8%9.27%SYMBOLCODECOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZETYPEQTYTREESAF2SIENNA GLEN MAPLE / ACER FREEMANII `SIENNA GLEN`B & B2.5"CAL6QB2SWAMP WHITE OAK / QUERCUS BICOLORB & B2.5"CAL12BP2WHITESPIRE BIRCH / BETULA PAPYRIFERA `WHITESPIRE`B & B2.5"CAL5CONIFERSPA2NORWAY SPRUCE / PICEA ABIESB & B8WPWHITE PINE / PINUS STROBUSB & B7ORN. TREESACAUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY / AMELANCHIER CANADENSIS `AUTUMN BRILLIANCE`B & B2"CAL4CODECOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZETYPEQTYSHRUBSAMAUTUMN MAGIC BLACK CHOKEBERRY / ARONIA MELANOCARPA `AUTUMN MAGIC`5 GAL5SX2LILAC / SYRINGA X `BLOOMERANG`5 GAL45HPLITTLE LIME HYDRANGEA / HYDRANGEA PANICULATA `JANE`5 GAL29JCMINT JULEP JUNIPER / JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS `MINT JULEP`5 GAL22GRASSESCXFEATHER REED GRASS / CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER`1 GAL49PERENNIALSSXAUTUMN FIRE SEDUM / SEDUM X `AUTUMN FIRE`1 GAL26HXBAJA DAYLILY / HEMEROCALLIS X `BAJA`1 GAL72HX4PLANTAIN LILY / HOSTA X `GUACAMOLE`1 GAL13SYMBOLCODECOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMEQTYGROUND COVERSMS8FORMERLY MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 / MNDOT SEED MIX WET DITCH4,706 SFTSSOD / TURF SOD HIGHLAND SOD34,357 SFPLANT SCHEDULE30 DRAFT REPORT www.transportationcollaborative.com To: Josh McKinney, PLA, Principal Measure Group From: Matt Pacyna, PE, Principal Transportation Collaborative & Consultants, LLC Date: April 11, 2025 Subject: Santa Vera Apartments Traffic Study; Chanhassen, MN INTRODUCTION TC2 completed a traffic study for the proposed Santa Vera Apartments development in the City of Chanhassen. The subject site, shown in Figure 1, is generally bound by City Center Park to the west, Saratoga Drive to the north, Laredo Drive to the east, and Chanhassen Elementary School to the south. The proposed development is a 59-unit market-rate apartment, which is immediately south of an existing 18-unit apartment complex. The main objectives of the study are to quantify existing traffic operations within the study area, evaluate potential impacts of the proposed development, and recommend improvements, if necessary, to ensure safe and efficient operations for all users. The following study assumptions, methodology, and findings are offered for consideration. Figure 1 Subject Site Subject Site Laredo Dr Kerber Blvd Del Rio Dr 78th St Powers Blvd (CR 17) 76th St Market Blvd 31 Santa Vera Apartments Traffic Study April 11, 2025 Page 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing conditions were reviewed within the study area to establish current traffic conditions to help determine impacts associated with the proposed development. The evaluation of existing conditions included collecting traffic volumes, observing transportation characteristics, reviewing crash history, and analyzing intersection capacity, which are described in the following sections. Traffic Volumes Vehicular intersection turning movement and pedestrian / bicyclist counts were collected on Wednesday March 26, 2025. The counts were generally collected from 7 to 9 a.m. and 4 to 6 p.m. with 13-hour counts (i.e., 6 a.m. to 7 p.m.) at the Kerber Boulevard / Santa Vera Drive and Laredo Drive / Saratoga Drive intersections. • Kerber Boulevard and Santa Vera Drive • Santa Vera Drive / Saratoga Circle and Saratoga Drive • Laredo Drive and Saratoga Drive • Laredo Drive and Del Rio Drive To illustrate how traffic volumes at study area intersections vary throughout the day, the traffic volume profiles by time-of-day are illustrated in Figure 2. Note that the adjacent Chanhassen Elementary School starts at 7:45 a.m. and ends at 2:15 p.m. Figure 2 Intersection Volume by Time of Day Transportation Characteristics Observations were conducted within the study area to identify various transportation characteristics such as roadway geometry, traffic controls, speed limits, and multimodal facilities. A general overview of key roadways within the study area is as follows: • Kerber Boulevard – a 2-lane undivided major collector roadway with multimodal facilities along both sides of the roadway. The speed limit is 40-mph with a 20-mph school zone speed limit near the elementary school. • Laredo Drive – a 2-lane undivided local roadway with a sidewalk along the west side of the roadway; the speed limit is 30-mph with a 15-mph school zone speed limit near the elementary school. All other study area roadways are 2-lane local roadways with limited multimodal facilities and a 30-mph speed limit. Each study intersection has side-street stop control. Existing geometrics, traffic controls, and volumes within the study area are shown in Figure 3. 0 50 100 150 Intersection VolumeKerber Blvd / Santa Vera Dr Laredo Dr / Saratoga Dr 32 550 550 700 650 1 5 0 300800303,7504, 0 0 0 1,300Figure 3Existing Conditions Santa Vera Apartments Traffic Study Legend AM Peak Hour VolumePM Peak Hour VolumeEstimated ADT VolumeStop Sign XXX(XXX)X,XXX NKerber BlvdSanta V e r a D r Saratoga DrLaredo DrDel Rio Dr 0 (0)0 (0)0 (0) 0 (2)0 (0)16 (12)0 (0)20 (63)2 (9)0 (0)63 (42)1 (2)11 (16)149 (132)5 (3)9 (13)42 (200)4 (21)3 (3)9 (11)12 (13)8 (12)20 (5)12 (11)0 ( 0 ) 2 ( 1 ) 25 (28)1 (3) 24 (26)0 (0)0 ( 0 ) 8 ( 2 ) 4 ( 2 ) 0 ( 0 ) 3 ( 5 ) 17 ( 2 4 )1 (2)1 (1)23 (25)0 (0)3 (0)0 (1) 1 (10)30 (18)8 (19)11 (43) 12 (10)31 (24) 0 (0)3 (2)1 (3)19 (62) 0 (0)61 (42) 1,10033 Santa Vera Apartments Traffic Study April 11, 2025 Page 4 Crash History Five (5) years of crash history were reviewed from 2020 through 2024 using MnDOT’s Crash Mapping Analysis Tool (MnCMAT), which identified two (2) intersection-related crashes within the study area. One (1) crash occurred at the Santa Vera Dr / Chippewa Trail intersection and one (1) at the Laredo Drive / 76th Street intersection. Neither crash resulted in a serious injury. Thus, there does not appear to be any existing safety issues in the study area from a crash frequency or severity perspective. Intersection Capacity Intersection capacity was evaluated using Synchro / SimTraffic Software (version 11), which uses methods outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition. The software is used to develop calibrated models that simulate observed traffic operations, account for peaking characteristics, and identify key metrics such as intersection Level of Service (LOS) and queues. These models incorporate collected traffic, pedestrian, and bicyclist volumes, traffic controls, heavy commercial vehicle activity (i.e., buses and trucks), and driver behavior factors. Level of Service (LOS) quantifies how an intersection is operating. Intersections are graded from LOS A to LOS F, which corresponds to the average delay per vehicle values shown. An overall intersection LOS A though LOS D is generally considered acceptable in the study area. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation, while LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity. For side-street stop-controlled intersections, special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for the level of service of the side-street approach. Traffic operations at an unsignalized intersection with side- street stop control can be described in two ways. First, consideration is given to the overall intersection level of service, which accounts for the total number of vehicles entering the intersection and the capability of the intersection to support the volumes. Second, it is important to consider the delay on the minor approach. Since the mainline does not have to stop, most delay is attributed to the side-street approaches. It is typical of intersections with higher mainline traffic volumes to experience high-levels of delay (i.e., poor levels of service) on the side-street approaches, but an acceptable overall intersection level of service during peak hour conditions. Results of the existing intersection capacity analysis, shown in Table 1, indicate that all study intersections and approaches operate at an acceptable LOS B or better during the typical weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. In addition, peak queues at the study intersections range from about one (1) to two (2) vehicles. Note that there is increased activity for a short-duration (i.e., approximately 15 minutes) near the start / end times associated with the adjacent Chanhassen Elementary School. However, this increased activity does not significantly impact the study intersections or their operations. Thus, there are no significant existing operational issues from an intersection capacity perspective. Level of Service Average Delay / Vehicles Stop, Yield, and Roundabout Intersections Signalized Intersections A < 10 seconds < 10 seconds B 10 to 15 seconds 10 to 20 seconds C 15 to 25 seconds 20 to 35 seconds D 25 to 35 seconds 35 to 55 seconds E 35 to 50 seconds 55 to 80 seconds F > 50 seconds > 80 seconds 34 Santa Vera Apartments Traffic Study April 11, 2025 Page 5 Table 1 Existing Intersection Capacity Study Intersection Traffic Control Level of Service (Delay) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Kerber Boulevard and Santa Vera Drive SSS A / B (12) A / B (12) Santa Vera Drive and West Site Access SSS A / A (9) A / A (9) Santa Vera Drive / Saratoga Circle and Saratoga Drive SSS A / B (10) A / A (9) Laredo Drive and Saratoga Drive SSS A / A (9) A / A (9) Laredo Drive and East Site Access SSS A / A (9) A / A (9) Laredo Drive and Del Rio Drive SSS A / B (10) A / A (9) SSS – Side-Street-Stop PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed development is generally bound by City Center Park to the west, Saratoga Drive to the north, Laredo Drive to the east, and Chanhassen Elementary School to the south. The proposed development is a 59-unit market-rate apartment, which is immediately south of an existing 18-unit apartment complex. If approved, the site would have a total of 77 units (18-existing, 59-proposesd). For study purposes, the project was assumed to be open to residents in the year 2027. Access to the proposed development is planned via the existing driveways along Santa Vera Drive and Laredo Drive that currently provide access to the existing apartments. No new access is planned. Sidewalk connections are planned to the existing City Center Park trail to the west, as well as the sidewalk along the west side of Laredo Drive. 35 Santa Vera Apartments Traffic Study April 11, 2025 Page 6 TRAFFIC FORECASTS Traffic forecasts were developed for year 2028 build conditions, which represents one-year after opening. The traffic forecasts account for general background growth and trip generation from the proposed development. The following information summarizes the traffic forecast development process. Background Growth To account for general background growth in the study area, an annual growth rate of one (1) percent was applied to the existing traffic volumes to develop year 2028 background traffic forecasts. Note that historical ADT volumes within the study area have been steady or decreasing over the last 10+ years. Therefore, the assumed growth rate provides a relatively conservative estimate for analysis purposes. Development Trip Generation A trip generation estimate for the proposed development was created using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, which includes trips for typical weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours, as well as daily. The proposed development, shown in Table 2, is estimated to generate 41 a.m. peak hour (10 in / 31 out), 46 p.m. peak hour (29 in / 17 out), and 454 daily (227 in / 227 out) trips. No modal reductions were applied to provide a more conservative estimate. Note that the average trip rates for a low-rise multi-family residential unit represent 0.4 trips / unit during the a.m. peak hour, 0.51 trips / unit during the p.m. peak hour, and 6.74 trips / unit per day. Table 2 Trip Generation Summary Land Use Type (ITE Code) Size AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily In Out In Out Existing Apartments (220) 18 units 2 5 6 3 122 Proposed: Multifamily Housing: Low-Rise (220) 59 units 10 31 29 17 454 Total Site Trips 77 units 12 36 35 20 576 Site generated trips for the proposed development were distributed throughout the study area using the directional distribution shown in Figure 4, which is based on a combination of existing area travel patterns and engineering judgment. Figure 4 also shows the proposed development site trips at the study intersections. The resultant year 2028 build condition traffic forecasts are illustrated in Figure 5. YEAR 2028 BUILD CONDITIONS To understand impacts associated with the proposed development, a future intersection capacity analysis was completed for year 2028 build conditions. Results of the year 2028 build capacity analysis shown in Table 3 indicate that that all study intersections and approaches will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS B or better during the typical weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Minimal change to intersection delays and queues are expected, which is a result of the relatively low trip generation of the proposed development and the reserve capacity within the adjacent roadway network. Thus, no operational issues are expected as a result of the proposed development from an intersection capacity perspective. 36 Figure 4Site Generated Trips Santa Vera Apartments Traffic Study +2750 (0)0 (0) 0 (0)5 (18)0 (0)0 (0)18 (9)0 (0)60% +175 +45+65+6 52 (4)0 (0)0 (0)2 (4)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (3)0 (0)5 (3)3 (2)5 (3)15% 10% 15% Legend AM Peak Hour Site TripsPM Peak Hour Site TripsADT Site TripsStop SignDirectional Distribution XXX(XXX)+XXX N 0 ( 0 ) 13 ( 8 ) 0 (0)5 (11) 0 (0)0 (0)0 ( 0 ) 0 ( 0 ) 0 ( 0 ) 0 ( 0 ) 0 ( 0 ) 0 ( 0 )0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (1) 0 (0)0 (0)8 (0)0 (0) 0 (0)0 (0) 0 (0)18 (9)5 (18)0 (0) 0 (0)0 (0) 37 740 565 895 715 1 5 5 310825303,9504, 2 0 0 1,600Figure 5Year 2028 Build Conditions Santa Vera Apartments Traffic Study Legend AM Peak Hour VolumePM Peak Hour VolumeEstimated ADT VolumeStop Sign XXX(XXX)X,XXX NKerber BlvdSanta V e r a D r Saratoga DrLaredo DrDel Rio Dr 0 (2)16 (12) 26 (83)2 (9) 83 (52)1 (2)13 (20)154 (136)5 (3)12 (18)43 (206)4 (22)3 (3)10 (14)12 (13)13 (15)24 (7)17 (15)0 ( 0 ) 15 ( 9 ) 26 (29)6 (14) 25 (27)0 (0)0 ( 0 ) 8 ( 2 ) 4 ( 2 ) 0 ( 0 ) 3 ( 5 ) 18 ( 2 5 )1 (2)1 (1)24 (26)0 (0)3 (0)0 (1) 1 (10)31 (19)9 (20)11 (44) 12 (10)32 (24) 0 (0)21 (11)6 (21)20 (64) 0 (0)63 (43) 1,40038 Santa Vera Apartments Traffic Study April 11, 2025 Page 9 Table 3 Existing Intersection Capacity Study Intersection Traffic Control Level of Service (Delay) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Kerber Boulevard and Santa Vera Drive SSS A / B (12) A / B (12) Santa Vera Drive and West Site Access SSS A / B (10) A / A (9) Santa Vera Drive / Saratoga Circle and Saratoga Drive SSS A / B (10) A / A (9) Laredo Drive and Saratoga Drive SSS A / A (9) A / A (9) Laredo Drive and East Site Access SSS A / B (10) A / A (9) Laredo Drive and Del Rio Drive SSS A / B (10) A / A (9) SSS – Side-Street-Stop SITE PLAN CONSIDERATIONS A review of the proposed site plan does not indicate any major issues. However, the following items are offered for further consideration between the City and / or project team. • Locate signage and landscaping to avoid creating any sight distance issues. • Review truck maneuverability to limit potential internal circulation conflicts. • Install appropriate internal traffic controls (i.e., stop signs, etc.) per coordination with City staff. CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings of the study, the following conclusions are offered for consideration. 1) There are no existing intersection crash frequency or severity issues within the study area. 2) All study intersections and approaches operate at an acceptable LOS B or better during the typical weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 3) The proposed development is a 59-unit market-rate apartment, which is immediately south of the existing 18-unit apartment complex. 4) Traffic forecasts were developed for year 2028 build conditions, which includes a one (1) percent annual background growth rate and trip generation from the proposed development; the proposed development is estimated to generate 41 a.m. peak hour (10 in / 31 out), 46 p.m. peak hour (29 in / 17 out), and 454 daily (227 in / 227 out) trips. 5) Results of the year 2028 build capacity analysis indicate that all study intersections and approaches are expected to continue to operate at an acceptable LOS B or better during the typical weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours; no operational issues are expected because of the proposed development from an intersection capacity perspective. 6) No significant site plan related issues were identified, although the items noted above are offered for further consideration by the City and / or project team. 39 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item ROW Ordinance Updates File No.Item No: A.2 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY The purpose of this agenda item is to discuss proposed ordinance amendments to Chapter 17, Article V- Right of Way Management. Chapter 17, Article V is designed to preserve the character and maintain the safety of the city’s right-of-way. It establishes regulations for the placement, maintenance, and use of facilities within public rights-of-way, aiming to minimize unnecessary encumbrances and promote efficient transportation systems. Last year, the city ran into some challenges with contractors working in the right-of-way installing fiber optic internet. Some of these challenges included insufficient restoration, property damage, inconsistent working hours, and poor communication. As such, city staff has explored updating this section of code in response to these challenges. These code updates will be the subject of this work session discussion and are scheduled to be considered for adoption at the May 12, 2025 City Council meeting. BACKGROUND Multiple internet service providers have begun expanding their fiber-optic networks into Chanhassen. 40 Contractors will install fiber-optic cables, which may involve visible work in public rights-of-way and utility easement areas, such as street and sidewalk areas. Although the work is not being done by the city, the contractors have city-issued permits to install the cable in the right of way. Residents can use this interactive map to learn more about active permits near their home: https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/government/projects/fiber-optic-buildout A detailed FAQ is available at the same link. DISCUSSION N/A BUDGET N/A RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS 41 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item City Council Roundtable File No.Item No: A.3 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION None Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY The quarterly roundtable is time for the City Council to discuss items of interest, propose new items for review, and ask general questions of staff/each other. Items with interest from at least two Councilmembers may be scheduled for research by staff, future work sessions, or other action as appropriate. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION 42 ATTACHMENTS Roundtable Overview 43 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL Roundtable Overviewand Guidelines The quarterly roundtable is scheduled time for the City Council to discuss items of interest, propose new items for review, and ask general questions of staff/each other. Timing: Quarterly, at a work session. Procedure: Councilmembers may submit items for consideration and publication in the council packet by noon on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. Be prepared to give a brief overview of proposed items at the work session. Actions: The City Council should determine the next steps, using the following menu of options: 1. Do nothing at this time 2. Park for discussion during the Strategic Plan update in January 3. Request staff prepare an issue paper (requires two votes of support) 4. Refer to a commission for further consideration (requires two votes of support) 5. Schedule a city council work session (requires three votes of support) CITY OF CHANHASSEN A Community For Life. 44 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item Future Work Session Schedule File No.Item No: A.4 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY The City Council is tentatively scheduled to hold the following work sessions: May 12, 2025 Fire Department Update and Staffing Overview May 19, 2025 Audit Results Presentation Hwy 5 JPA Hwy 7 Corridor Study June 9, 2025 Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center Workshop with BKV Pending items: 45 Sign Code updates Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center planning workshops Elections Pleasantview Rd. project planning BACKGROUND Staff or the City Council may suggest topics for work sessions. Dates are tentative until the meeting agenda is published. Work sessions are typically held at 5:30 pm in conjunction with the regular City Council meeting, but may be scheduled for other times as needed. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 46 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item Approve City Council Meeting Minutes dated April 14, 2025 File No.Item No: D.1 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Jenny Potter, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the City Council Meeting minutes dated April 14, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Chanhassen City Council approves the City Council Meeting minutes dated April 14, 2025. 47 ATTACHMENTS City Council Meeting minutes dated April 14, 2025 48 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 14, 2025 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilmember McDonald, Councilmember Schubert, Councilmember von Oven, and Councilmember Kimber. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:None. STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Eric Maass, Community Development Director; Jerry Ruegemer, Parks and Recreation Director; Priya Wall, Recreation Manager; Andrea McDowell-Poehler, City Attorney; and Jenny Potter, City Clerk. PUBLIC PRESENT:None. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: 1. Presentation of Certificates of Appreciation and Maple Leaf Awards to Outgoing Commissioners Mayor Ryan stated that the Commissioners had a great impact on the City Council and voiced appreciation for their service to Chanhassen. Councilmember Schubert read a statement about Park and Recreation Commissioner Dan Eidsmo and his service. Mayor Ryan presented Commissioner Eidsmo a certificate of appreciation. Councilmember Schubert read a statement about Park and Recreation Commissioner Scott Pharis and his service. Mayor Ryan presented Commissioner Pharis a certificate of appreciation. Councilmember Schubert read a statement about Park and Recreation Commissioner Jim Peck. Mayor Ryan presented Commissioner Peck with a Maple Leaf Award. Councilmember Kimber read a statement about Environmental Commissioner Kaisa Buckholz. Mayor Ryan presented Commissioner Buckholz with a certificate of appreciation. 49 City Council Minutes – April 14, 2025 2 Councilmember Kimber read a statement about Kara Cassidy, who served on the Commission on Aging. Mayor Ryan presented Commissioner Cassidy with a certificate of appreciation. Councilmember Kimber read a statement about Ruth Lunde, who served on the Commission on Aging. Mayor Ryan presented Commissioner Lunde with a Maple Leaf Award. Councilmember Kimber read a statement about Bhakti Modi, who served on the Commission on Aging. Mayor Ryan presented Commissioner Modi with a Maple Leaf Award. Councilmember von Oven read a statement about Planning Commissioner Ed Goff. Mayor Ryan presented Commissioner Goff with a certificate of appreciation. Councilmember McDonald read a statement about Economic Development Commissioner Chris Freeman. Mayor Ryan presented Commissioner Freeman with a certificate of appreciation. Councilmember McDonald read a statement about Economic Development Commissioner Stacy Goff. Mayor Ryan presented Commissioner Goff with a certificate of appreciation. 2. Invitation to Easter Egg Candy Hunt Mayor Ryan invited area residents and their friends to the Easter Egg Candy Hunt on April 19th at City Center Park. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilmember McDonald moved, Councilmember Kimber seconded that the City Council approve the following consent agenda items 1 through 22 pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated March 24, 2025 2. Approve City Council Work Session Minutes dated March 24, 2025 3. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated March 18, 2025 50 City Council Minutes – April 14, 2025 3 4. Receive Commission on Aging Minutes dated January 17, 2025 5. Receive Park and Recreation Commission Minutes dated February 25, 2025 6. Receive Economic Development Commission Minutes dated March 11, 2025 7. Approve Claims Paid dated April 14, 2025 8. Award Contract for Repair of Trench Drain at Public Works Building 9. Extending an Agreement to Allow an Auto Repair Garage on Property Zoned PUD, Located at 7914 Kerber Blvd 10. Approve Entering Into Contract with BKV Group for A&E Services for the Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center 11. Award Contract for 2025 Pothole Patching 12. Mediacom Franchise Fee Audit Settlement Agreement 13. Approve Base Bid To Tennis West, LLC for Resurfacing the Chanhassen Recreation Center Pickleball Courts 14. Approve a Memorandum of Understanding with the Rotary Club of Chanhassen for the 2025 4th of July Celebration 15. Approve an Encroachment Agreement between the City of Chanhassen and the property owner at 8607 Flamingo Drive 16. Award Contract for 2025 Pavement Striping 17. Approve Purchase of City Hall and Senior Center Furniture from Continua Interiors 18. Approves Purchases for Annual Lift Station Maintenance 19. Letter of Support for Comcast BEAD grant 20. Resolution 2025-26: Call for Assessment Hearing – Crimson Bay Road Improvement Project 21. Resolution 2025-27: Approve A Year-End Transfers 22. Resolution 2025-28: Approve Interfund Loans for the Fiscal Year 2024 All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. 51 City Council Minutes – April 14, 2025 4 FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATES. 1. Law Enforcement Update Chanhassen Liaison Lieutenant Stahn introduced his background experience in law enforcement. He explained the value of collaborative work and stated he would be available for them. He reviewed the areas of focus for 2025, including law enforcement operations and crime prevention, community engagement and partnerships, and administrative accountability. He reviewed the current process for traffic stops and explained suggestions for improvements from Mayor Ryan. Chanhassen Liaison Lieutenant Stahn introduced his staff. Mayor Ryan thanked Chanhassen Liaison Lieutenant Stahn and other law enforcement officers for the introduction. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS.None. PUBLIC HEARINGS.None. GENERAL BUSINESS. 1. Adopt Ordinance Amending Chapter 1 Definitions and Chapter 20 Section XXX: Lot Requirements and Setbacks for the Residential Low and Medium Density Zoning District Eric Maass, Community Development Director, reviewed the definition of detached townhomes in chapter one. He provided examples of current detached townhomes in Walnut Grove and North Bay and Avienda Townhomes Planned Unit Developments. He explained the differences in the site plans for detached townhomes. He provided a summary of the prior detached townhome setback comparisons and the ordinance proposal language. He noted that they were looking at modifying the single-family dwelling rear yard setback from 25 feet to 30 feet. Mayor Ryan asked about the differences between villas and detached townhomes. Mr. Maass responded that villas and detached townhomes were one and the same. He said that villas were slab-on-grade with no basement, but they operate the same. Mayor Ryan said the product exists in the community today in the Planned Unit Development Concept. She clarified this change was to be consistent across the City rather than for a developer. Mr. Maass answered that there was a development project that would like to use the product, but they did not create a policy for one project. He said there had been detached townhomes in the community for one decade. 52 City Council Minutes – April 14, 2025 5 Mayor Ryan asked about single-family low-density and said there was concern with zoning and putting a product among single-family homes. She asked if the ordinance allowed for this option. Mr. Maass responded that the residential low-medium district allowed for properties that were guided medium-density residential and low-density residential. He said that the land use throttles the density. He did not anticipate detached townhomes in low density because of the financial ramifications. Councilmember von Oven moved, Councilmember McDonald seconded that the Chanhassen City Council adopt an Ordinance Amending Chapter 1, General Provisions of the City Code defining detached townhome dwellings and amending Chapter 20 amending low requirements and setbacks for the residential low and medium density (RLM) zoning district. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS.None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. 1.Receive 2024 Park and Recreation Department Annual Report Jerry Ruegemer, Parks and Recreation Director, introduced Priya Wall. Priya Wall, Recreation Manager, explained the importance of the 2024 Park and Recreation Department Annual Report. She highlighted new events at the Chanhassen Recreation Center. She reviewed the new locations for the Summer Concert Series, the Tree Lighting Ceremony, and the Senior Center. She discussed the park, trail, and facility projects at Lake Ann Park Preserve Boardwalk, the baseball field dugouts, and the lakeside park pavilion. She described the increased communication strategies. She highlighted the different volunteer hours and sponsorship donations for local events. She provided an overview of the activities at the Chanhassen Senior Center. She reviewed participation at the Chanhassen Recreation Center and in the City in 2024. She highlighted the park maintenance completed in 2024. Mayor Ryan thanked Ms. Wall for the thorough report. She stated that it was phenomenal what the Park and Recreation team did in the City. Councilmember Kimber said that the numbers were astonishing, especially with the facilities available. Councilmember Schubert moved, Councilmember Kimber seconded that the Chanhassen City Council receives and approves the 2024 Park and Recreation Annual Report. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. 53 City Council Minutes – April 14, 2025 6 CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. 1. 2025 Q1 Communications Report Councilmember Schubert moved, Councilmember von Oven seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 7:59 p.m. Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen City Manager Prepared by Jenny Potter City Clerk 54 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item Approve City Council Work Session Minutes dated April 14, 2025 File No.Item No: D.2 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Jenny Potter, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the City Council Work Session Minutes dated April 14, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Chanhassen City Council approves the City Council Work Session minutes dated April 14, 2025. 55 ATTACHMENTS City Council Work Session minutes dated April 14, 2025 56 1 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES April 14, 2025 Mayor Ryan called the work session to order at 5:36 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT:Mayor Ryan, Councilmember von Oven, Councilmember Kimber, Councilmember McDonald, Councilmember Schubert COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager; Patrick Gavin, Communications Manager; Jerry Ruegemer, Parks Director; Eric Maass, Community Development Director; George Bender, Assistant City Engineer; Andrew Heger, Fire Chief;Jenny Potter, City Clerk PUBLIC PRESENT: Assessment Policy Updates Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer and George Bender, Assistant City Engineer, discussed the fee schedule and funding impact of a flat rate, noting that while adopting a flat rate would shift some reconstruction project costs to the city, it would not require new revenue and remain manageable within existing fund balances. Mr. Howley explained that the proposed rates would be reviewed annually and adjusted for inflation, with more comprehensive evaluations occurring every few years to ensure accuracy and compliance with state assessment procedures. The City Council agreed to adopt a flat rate of $2,850/unit for mill and overlay projects (regardless of depth utilized), $5,000/unit for full depth reclamation projects, and $9,270/unit for a full reconstruction. Mayor Ryan recessed the work session at 6:58 P.M. Mayor Ryan reconvened the work session at 8:05 P.M. Sports Facilities Company Introduction Jim Arnold from Sports Facilities Companies (SFC) spoke to councilmembers about their services and offerings, which include end-to-end services for planning, developing and managing sports, recreation and community venues. The city has engaged with SFC to develop a detailed financial forecast that outlines the expected revenues, expenses and overall financial sustainability of the future Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center. 57 City Council Work Session Minutes – April 14, 2025 2 Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) - Review Draft Ordinances Eric Maass, Community Development Director, presented a draft ordinance that would allow attached and internal ADUs through an administrative building permit process. The City Council affirmed their support to move the ordinance specific to attached and internal ADUs forward for Planning Commission review and a public hearing. The City Council also reviewed a separate draft ordinance regarding detached ADUs, prompted by previous interest in expanding housing options and recent citizen inquiries. Staff outlined the City Attorney’s recommendation that conditional use permit, not variances, be the appropriate review mechanism for detached ADUs, should the City Council wish to pursue them in A-2, RR or RSF zoning districts. Additionally, the City Council was asked to weigh in on how the city interprets what constitutes a “dwelling unit,” using a recent project example to explore the distinction between wet bars and full kitchens under the zoning code. The City Council expressed its preference that decisions around proposed building projects that have components of a dwelling unit, but not all required components, remain at city staff discretion for the time being, trusting staff to incorporate councilmember concerns into future recommendations. Winter Parking and No Parking Policies Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer, revisited a resident petition requesting the removal of No Parking designations on Kiowa Avenue, Iroquois Avenue and Huron Avenue—part of the 2024 Street Improvement Project (24-01). Originally discussed at the January 13 work session, the No Parking designation was implemented to comply with City Code and the Minnesota State Fire Code, ensuring adequate fire apparatus access on streets with limited width. While roughly two-thirds of directly affected residents supported the petition, staff emphasized that the designation aligns with long-standing safety protocols, especially on streets without sidewalks. Given the broader implications of similar situations across the city, the City Council opted to discuss the matter as part of a potential city-wide policy review. Staff also incorporated feedback from a separate Citizen Action Request related to winter no-parking regulations, allowing both issues to be considered together for consistency and direction. The City Council asked for further time to assess the city’s No Parking designations in order to think more holistically about what changes, if any, should be made to City Code to create the most sensible policy. The council said it would respond soon to the specific resident petition on Kiowa Avenue, Iroquois Avenue and Huron Avenues. Mr. Howley presented the City Council with several different methods to tweak the city’s winter no-parking rules and procedures. The current policy is: On-street parking is prohibited between November 1 and April 1 between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. On-street parking is also prohibited when there are two inches or more of snow on a street, the street is not plowed across its full width, or if the city's Public Works Director determines the street is not safely passable by maintenance and/or emergency vehicles or equipment. Options presented included removing the winter-long blanket parking ban and changing to enforcing parking restrictions any time there’s 1/2 inches of snow until plowing is complete. The 58 City Council Work Session Minutes –April 14,2025 3 intent was to give residents more flexibility for on-street parking during the winter, such as when there is no snow. The City Council expressed their preference to keep the city’s winter parking policy as is with no changes. Mayor Ryan adjourned the work session at 9:43 P.M. Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen City Manager Prepared by Jenny Potter City Clerk 59 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item Receive Environmental Commission Minutes dated March 12, 2025 File No.Item No: D.3 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Amy Weidman, Senior Admin Support Specialist Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council receives Environmental Commission Minutes dated March 12, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 60 Environmental Commission Minutes dated March 12, 2025 61 Chanhassen Environmental Commission (EC) 6:00 pm March 12, 2025 Members Present: Scott Grefe, Leslie Elhadi, Billy Cripe, Paget Pengelly, John Stutzman, Sidney Lindmark Members Absent: Kaisa Buckholz, Wren Roemer Staff Present: Jamie Marsh, Environmental Resource Specialist Visitors: Glenn Stolar Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 6:03 p.m. Minutes Commissioner Elhadi moved to approve the meeting minutes dated January 8, 2025 with clarifying edits; Commissioner Cripe seconded. The minutes were approved with a 6-0 vote. After the minutes were approved, introductions were made to audience member Glenn Stolar, who will be joining the Environmental Commission in April. He shared he used to be on the Park & Recreation Commission and has recently served on the board for the Arboretum. Discussion Items 1. Trivia Night Follow-Up The recent trivia night was held at Hackamore Brewing Company. Ideas for the next event included an additional monitor for viewing the questions and scheduling a different weeknight since Friday is already a busy night. Based on participant feedback the commissioners plan to review the questions as a group for style and difficulty. The commissioners discussed different ideas for sharing the questions and submitting answers. Group meetings and trivia apps could work and help reduce paper, but phones aren’t allowed during trivia events. Attendees enjoyed the options for prizes. Overall, the event was a success. They tentatively decided on the next trivia night in October, with Commissioner Cripe looking into possible dates. The topic will be revisited in June. 2. Environmental Academy The Commissioners discussed the Environmental Academy. Discussion included the possibility of partnering with Carver County and how many sessions to hold. Ms. Marsh will reach out to Camp Fire MN to schedule a nature walk in early September, potentially for the first event of the academy. 62 Commissioners brainstormed more ideas for the series. Ideas included partnering with a county park, winery, or the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum. They discussed learning from a master gardener about developing apple varietals. Within Chanhassen, Lake Ann Park Preserve and the community gardens were proposed as outdoor locations. The Great River Greening project with biochar and controlling invasive species could be a possible topic. Ms. Marsh will reach out to the county to discuss continuing partnering for the Environmental Academy events. The commissioners will revisit the Academy topics to narrow down the ideas and set dates for the events in September and October. The plan is to finalize locations, dates, and topics by the July meeting. 3. Arbor Day Activities The Arbor Day event will be held on Saturday, May 3 at 9 a.m. and the park is tentatively planned for Roundhouse Park. During the event, 22 trees will be planted. The commissioners discussed the various ways the event is advertised. They discussed some other possible places where they could recruit volunteers if needed. They discussed introducing the species and having a frisbee stump toss game and refreshments. The planting depth and method will be taught at the event. 4. July 3rd Trade Fair Planning The Environmental Commissioners are interested in hosting a table again this summer. They agreed that an engaging activity with limited areas of discussion to maximize the impact. The commissioners would like to get a spinning wheel that could be used for an interactive trivia question with prizes, which would be easy to reuse at many events. Prizes could include candy, seed packets, and LED lightbulbs. The table could be used to promote the Environmental Academy. Commission Presentations Commissioner Pengelly discussed a proposed bill at the state level that would remove the pollinator account that provides grants for converting to pollinator yards. Ms. Marsh will look into policy regarding sending a letter to oppose the bill from the commission. If not, commissioners are welcome to send letters as constituents to oppose the bill. Commissioner Lindmark shared that Carver County has issued a PowerPoint to stakeholders about the county programs. Commissioner Grefe attended the Park and Recreation Commission meeting. Great River Greening presented about the biochar program and the invasive species mitigation—in particular buckthorn. It will be a project that lasts over several years. There could be some community events during that time. The commissioners thought this could be an opportunity for the Environmental Academy. Upcoming Items and Events 1. Residential Tree Sale The tree sale opens to Chanhassen residents on March 17. The tree sale will be subsidized by the city this year. The bareroot trees will range from five to ten feet tall, depending on which of the 63 seven available species that tree is. The tree pickup is in May, and she asked for volunteers for those days to help. Commissioner Lindmark will volunteer at the pick-up on Friday, and Commissioner Elhadi will volunteer on Saturday. The commissioners discussed the variety of trees being offered. Adjournment Commissioner Cripe moved to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Elhadi seconded. The motion carried 6-0 and Chair Grefe adjourned at 7:35 p.m. Minutes prepared by Amy Weidman, Senior Administrative Support Specialist Minutes Submitted by Jamie Marsh, Environmental Resource Specialist 64 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item Approve Claims Paid dated April 28, 2025 File No.Item No: D.4 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Danielle Washburn, Assistant Finance Director Reviewed By Kelly Grinnell SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council Approves Claims Paid dated April 28, 2025." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Financial Sustainability SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION The following claims are submitted for review and approval on April 28, 2025: Total Claims $885,393.19 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION 65 ATTACHMENTS Payment Summary Payment Detail 66 Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Acme Electric Motor, Inc 04/10/2025 0.00 249.00 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 04/10/2025 0.00 309.38 ASPEN MILLS 04/10/2025 0.00 149.69 Barr Engineering Company 04/10/2025 0.00 3,920.00 Blackburn Manufacturing Company 04/10/2025 0.00 3,019.60 Carver County 04/10/2025 0.00 17,234.29 Certified Laboratories 04/10/2025 0.00 208.40 CITY OF CHASKA 04/10/2025 0.00 1,637.02 Cleaning Solutions Services 04/10/2025 0.00 1,065.00 CORE & MAIN LP 04/10/2025 0.00 1,702.13 CROWN COLLEGE 04/10/2025 0.00 900.00 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 04/10/2025 0.00 390.91 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC 04/10/2025 0.00 1,197.88 Enterprise FM Trust 04/10/2025 0.00 35,473.30 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 04/10/2025 0.00 563.58 HALLOCK COMPANY 04/10/2025 0.00 54.27 Health Strategies 04/10/2025 0.00 130.00 Holt Tour and Charter Inc 04/10/2025 0.00 850.00 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 04/10/2025 0.00 190.64 Jasper Engineering & Equipment Co 04/10/2025 0.00 3,881.10 Juli Al-Hilwani 04/10/2025 0.00 468.75 KAYE L BENSON 04/10/2025 0.00 560.00 Kerry Maus 04/10/2025 0.00 375.00 Lano Equipment 04/10/2025 0.00 235.27 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 04/10/2025 0.00 425.00 Loch Monster Plumbing, LLC 04/10/2025 0.00 1,823.65 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 04/10/2025 0.00 2,460.15 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 04/10/2025 0.00 1,910.25 New Look Contracting, Inc 04/10/2025 0.00 8,306.04 Pinnacle Pest Control 04/10/2025 0.00 730.00 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 04/10/2025 0.00 76.45 True Plumbing Solutions MN LLC 04/10/2025 0.00 3,140.00 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 04/10/2025 0.00 425.00 United Rentals (North America), Inc. 04/10/2025 0.00 3,960.00 USA BLUE BOOK 04/10/2025 0.00 587.35 WAYTEK INC 04/10/2025 0.00 174.38 William Kenzie 04/10/2025 0.00 2,700.00 WW GRAINGER INC 04/10/2025 0.00 45.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/15/2025 0.00 7,577.94 CenturyLink 04/15/2025 0.00 64.00 Marco Inc 04/15/2025 0.00 1,010.00 Matt Unmacht 04/15/2025 0.00 492.80 Metronet Holdings, LLC 04/15/2025 0.00 162.22 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 04/15/2025 0.00 23.00 Page 1 of 3 67 Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 04/15/2025 0.00 289.53 NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 04/15/2025 0.00 7,780.00 Priya Tandon 04/15/2025 0.00 400.00 ALEX AIR APPARATUS 2 LLC 04/16/2025 0.00 307.00 Allegra Print & Imaging 04/16/2025 0.00 798.00 American Pump Company 04/16/2025 0.00 1,892.31 AMERICAN SOLUTIONS 04/16/2025 0.00 463.96 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 04/16/2025 0.00 1,236.26 BOLTON & MENK INC 04/16/2025 0.00 5,083.00 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 04/16/2025 0.00 281.46 BS & A Software 04/16/2025 0.00 10,560.00 Cady Business Techologies 04/16/2025 0.00 592.69 Cameron Bigsby 04/16/2025 0.00 100.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 04/16/2025 0.00 17,600.85 Carver County 04/16/2025 0.00 415.00 CENTURY FENCE COMPANY 04/16/2025 0.00 5,920.00 Cintas Corporation No. 2 04/16/2025 0.00 109.93 City of Dayton 04/16/2025 0.00 1,400.00 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 04/16/2025 0.00 256.25 DEM-CON LANDFILL 04/16/2025 0.00 1,015.70 Diversified Plumbing and Heating Inc 04/16/2025 0.00 136.00 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 04/16/2025 0.00 40.30 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 04/16/2025 0.00 275.00 Engel Water Testing Inc 04/16/2025 0.00 1,200.00 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 04/16/2025 0.00 595.35 GREEN MEADOWS INC 04/16/2025 0.00 1,710.00 Greystone Construction Co. 04/16/2025 0.00 131,233.76 GS DIRECT INC 04/16/2025 0.00 748.09 HealthPartners, Inc. 04/16/2025 0.00 85,439.53 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 112 04/16/2025 0.00 11,356.41 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 04/16/2025 0.00 162.24 Juli Al-Hilwani 04/16/2025 0.00 162.00 KORTERRA INC 04/16/2025 0.00 2,500.00 Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P 04/16/2025 0.00 3,333.33 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 04/16/2025 0.00 666.18 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 04/16/2025 0.00 241,707.34 Midwest Electric Generator 04/16/2025 0.00 64.00 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 04/16/2025 0.00 786.13 Nuss Truck & Equipment 04/16/2025 0.00 133,640.86 NvoicePay 04/16/2025 0.00 715.64 PRECISE MRM LLC 04/16/2025 0.00 294.00 Premium Waters, Inc 04/16/2025 0.00 4.32 Rent N Save Portable Services 04/16/2025 0.00 1,441.00 Sophia Martin 04/16/2025 0.00 91.00 Sports Facilities Companies LLC 04/16/2025 0.00 15,000.00 Stericycle, Inc 04/16/2025 0.00 296.33 Street Smart Rentals LLC 04/16/2025 0.00 44,424.00 SUSAN & BRIAN VOELKER 04/16/2025 0.00 50.00 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 04/16/2025 0.00 850.00 TSG Server & Storage, Inc 04/16/2025 0.00 3,048.00 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 04/16/2025 0.00 360.00 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 04/16/2025 0.00 1,611.78 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 04/16/2025 0.00 280.00 Page 2 of 3 68 Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 04/16/2025 0.00 33,780.25 WW GRAINGER INC 04/16/2025 0.00 29.97 Report Total:0.00 885,393.19 Page 3 of 3 69 AP Check Detail User: dwashburn@chanhassenmn.gov Printed: 4/18/2025 1:08:58 PM Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Acme Electric Motor, Inc 700-0000-4260 124.50 4/10/2025 tools Acme Electric Motor, Inc 701-0000-4260 124.50 4/10/2025 tools 249.00 4/10/2025 Acme Electric Motor, Inc 249.00 ALEX AIR APPARATUS 2 LLC 101-1220-4530 307.00 4/16/2025 4-Gas Calibration Gas 307.00 4/16/2025 ALEX AIR APPARATUS 2 LLC 307.00 Al-Hilwani Juli 101-1530-4347 468.75 4/10/2025 Flolid 5 Blackmun 10 sessions 468.75 4/10/2025 Al-Hilwani Juli 101-1539-4343 75.00 4/16/2025 Pickleball Lesson Al-Hilwani Juli 101-1530-4347 87.00 4/16/2025 2 Single Sessions - Crain 162.00 4/16/2025 Al-Hilwani Juli 630.75 Allegra Print & Imaging 101-1120-4110 798.00 4/16/2025 Post Card paper 798.00 4/16/2025 AP - Check Detail (4/18/2025)Page 1 of 21 70 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Allegra Print & Imaging 798.00 American Pump Company 700-0000-4550 1,160.45 4/16/2025 supplies for flushing hydrants American Pump Company 700-0000-4550 599.10 4/16/2025 supplies for flushing hydrants American Pump Company 700-0000-4550 132.76 4/16/2025 hydrants supplies 1,892.31 4/16/2025 American Pump Company 1,892.31 AMERICAN SOLUTIONS 101-1120-4110 463.96 4/16/2025 #10 Window Envelopes 463.96 4/16/2025 AMERICAN SOLUTIONS 463.96 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4110 309.38 4/10/2025 Water Filter City Hall 309.38 4/10/2025 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4110 745.97 4/16/2025 Front Desk and Building Dept Coffee ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1120-4110 490.29 4/16/2025 Public Works Coffee 1,236.26 4/16/2025 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 1,545.64 ASPEN MILLS 101-1220-4240 149.69 4/10/2025 Duty pants-D. Anderson 149.69 4/10/2025 ASPEN MILLS 149.69 Barr Engineering Company 700-7025-4300 3,920.00 4/10/2025 Well #10 & 12 Rehab 3,920.00 4/10/2025 AP - Check Detail (4/18/2025)Page 2 of 21 71 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Barr Engineering Company 3,920.00 BENSON KAYE L 101-1539-4343 560.00 4/10/2025 Fit for Life 560.00 4/10/2025 BENSON KAYE L 560.00 Bigsby Cameron 700-7204-4901 100.00 4/16/2025 WaterWise Rebate-Dishwasher 100.00 4/16/2025 Bigsby Cameron 100.00 Blackburn Manufacturing Company 701-0000-4150 1,509.80 4/10/2025 locating paint Blackburn Manufacturing Company 700-0000-4150 1,509.80 4/10/2025 locating paint 3,019.60 4/10/2025 Blackburn Manufacturing Company 3,019.60 BOLTON & MENK INC 701-6048-4300 660.79 4/16/2025 Crimson Bay Road @ 13% BOLTON & MENK INC 700-6048-4300 660.79 4/16/2025 Crimson Bay Road @ 13% BOLTON & MENK INC 601-6048-4300 3,405.61 4/16/2025 Crimson Bay Road @ 67% BOLTON & MENK INC 720-6048-4300 355.81 4/16/2025 Crimson Bay Road @ 7% 5,083.00 4/16/2025 BOLTON & MENK INC 5,083.00 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 101-1220-4142 -167.99 4/16/2025 Return Stabilization Strap BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 101-1220-4142 449.45 4/16/2025 Medical supplies 281.46 4/16/2025 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 281.46 AP - Check Detail (4/18/2025)Page 3 of 21 72 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description BS & A Software 101-1160-4236 10,560.00 4/16/2025 Annual Com Dev SAAS & Cloud Hosting Fee 10,560.00 4/16/2025 BS & A Software 10,560.00 Cady Business Techologies 101-1160-4310 592.69 4/16/2025 Mitel Phone System Maint - April 592.69 4/16/2025 Cady Business Techologies 592.69 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 101-1420-4300 920.00 4/16/2025 Pleasant View Pointe - Legal March 2025 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 101-1140-4302 16,680.85 4/16/2025 Legal Services-March 2025 17,600.85 4/16/2025 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 17,600.85 Carver County 101-1210-4300 1,000.00 4/10/2025 Liquor background checks Carver County 101-1160-4234 14,784.29 4/10/2025 ESRI Software Agreement Renewal Year 3 of 3 Carver County 700-1160-4326 750.00 4/10/2025 Carverlink Dark Fiber Service - Utility Locations Carver County 101-1160-4326 700.00 4/10/2025 CarverLink Internet & Dark Fiber Service 17,234.29 4/10/2025 Carver County 101-1130-4301 415.00 4/16/2025 Information request for audit 415.00 4/16/2025 Carver County 17,649.29 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 700-7019-4321 677.82 4/15/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 701-0000-4321 191.82 4/15/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1600-4321 21.91 4/15/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1220-4321 658.35 4/15/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 700-7043-4321 1,078.33 4/15/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1190-4321 1,848.94 4/15/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 700-0000-4321 254.24 4/15/2025 Gas Charges AP - Check Detail (4/18/2025)Page 4 of 21 73 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1530-4321 249.84 4/15/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1550-4321 398.87 4/15/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1312-4321 1,304.96 4/15/2025 Gas Charges CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1170-4321 892.86 4/15/2025 Gas Charges 7,577.94 4/15/2025 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 7,577.94 CENTURY FENCE COMPANY 101-1550-4300 5,920.00 4/16/2025 101 fence repair 5,920.00 4/16/2025 CENTURY FENCE COMPANY 5,920.00 CenturyLink 700-0000-4310 32.00 4/15/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges CenturyLink 701-0000-4310 32.00 4/15/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges 64.00 4/15/2025 CenturyLink 64.00 Certified Laboratories 101-1370-4170 208.40 4/10/2025 grease 208.40 4/10/2025 Certified Laboratories 208.40 Cintas Corporation No. 2 101-1312-4510 109.93 4/16/2025 first aid kits 109.93 4/16/2025 Cintas Corporation No. 2 109.93 CITY OF CHASKA 101-1560-4349 524.92 4/10/2025 The Drifters Event 3/20/2025 CITY OF CHASKA 101-1560-4342 1,112.10 4/10/2025 The Drifters Event 3/20/2025 AP - Check Detail (4/18/2025)Page 5 of 21 74 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 1,637.02 4/10/2025 CITY OF CHASKA 1,637.02 City of Dayton 101-1220-4370 350.00 4/16/2025 Brandt Auto Ex Class City of Dayton 101-1220-4370 350.00 4/16/2025 Balk Auto Ex Class City of Dayton 101-1220-4370 350.00 4/16/2025 Thoreson Auto Ex Class City of Dayton 101-1220-4370 350.00 4/16/2025 Smith Auto Ex Class 1,400.00 4/16/2025 City of Dayton 1,400.00 Cleaning Solutions Services 101-1190-4511 1,065.00 4/10/2025 Strip & Wax Library Entrance/Restrooms 1,065.00 4/10/2025 Cleaning Solutions Services 1,065.00 CORE & MAIN LP 700-0000-4550 1,203.56 4/10/2025 2"" brass meter flange CORE & MAIN LP 700-0000-4550 498.57 4/10/2025 fire hydrant parts 1,702.13 4/10/2025 CORE & MAIN LP 1,702.13 CROWN COLLEGE 101-1220-4370 900.00 4/10/2025 Quarterly EMS Training 900.00 4/10/2025 CROWN COLLEGE 900.00 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 101-1370-4260 256.25 4/16/2025 battery jump pack 256.25 4/16/2025 AP - Check Detail (4/18/2025)Page 6 of 21 75 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 256.25 DEM-CON LANDFILL 101-1320-4150 779.34 4/16/2025 street sweeping DEM-CON LANDFILL 101-1320-4150 236.36 4/16/2025 street sweeping 1,015.70 4/16/2025 DEM-CON LANDFILL 1,015.70 Diversified Plumbing and Heating Inc 101-1250-3305 136.00 4/16/2025 Duplicate Permit - 7265 Hillsdale Ct 136.00 4/16/2025 Diversified Plumbing and Heating Inc 136.00 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 101-1110-4336 40.30 4/10/2025 Publication of Summary Ord 741 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 601-6048-4300 350.61 4/10/2025 Crimson Bay Rd - Ad for Bids 390.91 4/10/2025 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 101-1420-4336 40.30 4/16/2025 Affidavit of Publication City Code 40.30 4/16/2025 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 431.21 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 481-0000-4300 275.00 4/16/2025 Discussion of eligible uses of funds 275.00 4/16/2025 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 275.00 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC 101-1220-4140 1,197.88 4/10/2025 replace core module for emergency lighting 1,197.88 4/10/2025 AP - Check Detail (4/18/2025)Page 7 of 21 76 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC 1,197.88 Engel Water Testing Inc 700-0000-4300 1,200.00 4/16/2025 water samples 1,200.00 4/16/2025 Engel Water Testing Inc 1,200.00 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 316.21 4/10/2025 131 - 24 Chev Silv #27NDJK Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 737.99 4/10/2025 420 - 23 Chev Silv #25XGMS Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 75.97 4/10/2025 140 - 22 Chev Silv #25G5J6 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 749.11 4/10/2025 201 - 22 GMC Yuko #25MPSN Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 618.00 4/10/2025 214 - 22 Chev Silv #25G5D2 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 444.03 4/10/2025 606 - 22 Ford Rang #25G23Z Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-4811 135.46 4/10/2025 310 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR3 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 195.04 4/10/2025 416 - 23 Chev Silv #25XGMC Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 722.79 4/10/2025 401 - 23 Chev Silv #26RPBZ Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 263.46 4/10/2025 603 - 25 Chev Equi #28CM4H Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-2317 390.24 4/10/2025 303 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR7 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 686.73 4/10/2025 131 - 24 Chev Silv #27NDJK Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-2317 389.58 4/10/2025 301 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR8 Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-2317 389.21 4/10/2025 315 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGTV Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-4811 139.49 4/10/2025 306 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGRB Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 638.24 4/10/2025 411 - 22 Chev Silv #25G8CL Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 727.40 4/10/2025 404 - 24 GMC Sier #27NDJJ Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 179.30 4/10/2025 602 - 24 Chev Equi #27MF9K Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 574.55 4/10/2025 430 - 24 Chry Paci #275N63 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 633.25 4/10/2025 140 - 22 Chev Silv #25G5J6 Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-2317 389.58 4/10/2025 301 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR8 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 632.31 4/10/2025 408 - 22 Chev Silv #25G89X Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 255.28 4/10/2025 505 - 23 Chev Silv #26RP8Z Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-2317 389.22 4/10/2025 315 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGTV Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 724.59 4/10/2025 402 - 23 Chev Silv #25XGMF Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 253.62 4/10/2025 401 - 23 Chev Silv #26RPBZ Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-4811 126.14 4/10/2025 308 - 24 Chev Silv #27RZHT Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-4811 140.19 4/10/2025 301 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR8 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 249.81 4/10/2025 204 - 23 Chev Tahoe #25WDVL Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-2317 200.15 4/10/2025 307 - 23 Chev Equinox #262P8K Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-2317 318.21 4/10/2025 305 - 22 Chev Silv #25G5QR Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-2317 363.85 4/10/2025 308 - 24 Chev Silv #27RZHT Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 445.06 4/10/2025 602 - 24 Chev Equi #27MF9K AP - Check Detail (4/18/2025)Page 8 of 21 77 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 742.56 4/10/2025 132 - 23 Chev Silv #25WNCN Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 101.37 4/10/2025 201 - 22 GMC Yuko #25MPSN Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 350.14 4/10/2025 130 - 24 GMC Sier #27NF7M Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 518.03 4/10/2025 801 - 24 Chry Paci #2754MQ Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 626.39 4/10/2025 204 - 23 Chev Tahoe #25WDVL Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-2317 390.28 4/10/2025 306 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGRB Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 531.10 4/10/2025 412 - 22 GMC Sier #25H28F Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 738.32 4/10/2025 416 - 23 Chev Silv #25XGMC Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 274.25 4/10/2025 501 - 23 Chev Silv #26RL44 Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-4811 140.18 4/10/2025 301 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR8 Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-2317 390.23 4/10/2025 303 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR7 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 600.63 4/10/2025 405 - 22 Chev Silv #25G5QQ Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 264.34 4/10/2025 203 - 23 Chev Silv #26RPC3 Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-4811 47.07 4/10/2025 305 - 22 Chev Silv #25G5QR Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 106.12 4/10/2025 408 - 22 Chev Silv #25G89X Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-4811 47.06 4/10/2025 305 - 22 Chev Silv #25G5QR Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-4811 139.49 4/10/2025 306 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGRB Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 739.99 4/10/2025 403 - 23 Chev Silv #25XGMK Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 70.15 4/10/2025 412 - 22 GMC Sier #25H28F Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-2317 393.19 4/10/2025 310 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR3 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 102.13 4/10/2025 606 - 22 Ford Rang #25G23Z Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-2317 363.86 4/10/2025 308 - 24 Chev Silv #27RZHT Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 211.10 4/10/2025 402 - 23 Chev Silv #25XGMF Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-2317 200.15 4/10/2025 307 - 23 Chev Equinox #262P8K Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 727.37 4/10/2025 410 - 24 GMC Sier #27NDJB Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 138.65 4/10/2025 405 - 22 Chev Silv #25G5QQ Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 589.89 4/10/2025 603 - 25 Chev Equi #28CM4H Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 272.96 4/10/2025 430 - 24 Chry Paci #275N63 Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-4811 142.05 4/10/2025 315 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGTV Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-4811 126.15 4/10/2025 308 - 24 Chev Silv #27RZHT Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 98.56 4/10/2025 605 - 22 Ford Rang #25G25M Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-2317 318.22 4/10/2025 305 - 22 Chev Silv #25G5QR Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-2317 389.22 4/10/2025 314 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGTW Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-4811 139.04 4/10/2025 303 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR7 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 181.89 4/10/2025 502 - 23 Chev Blazer #25XQVB Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 432.69 4/10/2025 001 - 22 Ford Esca #26M3MH Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 87.43 4/10/2025 214 - 22 Chev Silv #25G5D2 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 740.08 4/10/2025 419 - 23 Chev Silv #25XGMJ Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 537.74 4/10/2025 502 - 23 Chev Blazer #25XQVB Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 195.48 4/10/2025 403 - 23 Chev Silv #25XGMK Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-4811 135.45 4/10/2025 310 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR3 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 275.37 4/10/2025 801 - 24 Chry Paci #2754MQ Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 483.22 4/10/2025 605 - 22 Ford Rang #25G25M AP - Check Detail (4/18/2025)Page 9 of 21 78 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-4811 142.06 4/10/2025 314 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGTW Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 194.95 4/10/2025 420 - 23 Chev Silv #25XGMS Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 249.81 4/10/2025 202 - 23 Chev Tahoe #25WDVJ Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-4811 142.05 4/10/2025 314 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGTW Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 678.56 4/10/2025 203 - 23 Chev Silv #26RPC3 Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-2317 390.27 4/10/2025 306 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGRB Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 716.20 4/10/2025 505 - 23 Chev Silv #26RP8Z Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 354.25 4/10/2025 404 - 24 GMC Sier #27NDJJ Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 727.61 4/10/2025 130 - 24 GMC Sier #27NF7M Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-4811 58.06 4/10/2025 307 - 23 Chev Equinox #262P8K Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 586.51 4/10/2025 501 - 23 Chev Silv #26RL44 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 97.00 4/10/2025 411 - 22 Chev Silv #25G8CL Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 191.68 4/10/2025 132 - 23 Chev Silv #25WNCN Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 118.64 4/10/2025 001 - 22 Ford Esca #26M3MH Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-2317 389.21 4/10/2025 314 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGTW Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 354.33 4/10/2025 410 - 24 GMC Sier #27NDJB Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 742.55 4/10/2025 134 - 23 Chev Silv #25WNKR Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-2317 393.19 4/10/2025 310 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR3 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4810 626.39 4/10/2025 202 - 23 Chev Tahoe #25WDVJ Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-4811 58.06 4/10/2025 307 - 23 Chev Equinox #262P8K Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 195.50 4/10/2025 419 - 23 Chev Silv #25XGMJ Enterprise FM Trust 701-0000-4811 142.06 4/10/2025 315 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGTV Enterprise FM Trust 700-0000-4811 139.04 4/10/2025 303 - 24 Chev Silv #27MGR7 Enterprise FM Trust 400-0000-4811 191.67 4/10/2025 134 - 23 Chev Silv #25WNKR 35,473.30 4/10/2025 Enterprise FM Trust 35,473.30 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4550 244.40 4/10/2025 flange kits Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4120 319.18 4/10/2025 valve key 563.58 4/10/2025 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 563.58 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 700-0000-4300 297.68 4/16/2025 Utility locates-March GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 701-0000-4300 297.67 4/16/2025 Utility locates-March 595.35 4/16/2025 AP - Check Detail (4/18/2025)Page 10 of 21 79 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 595.35 GREEN MEADOWS INC 101-1550-1193 855.00 4/16/2025 Snow Plowing GREEN MEADOWS INC 101-1550-1193 855.00 4/16/2025 Snow Plowing 1,710.00 4/16/2025 GREEN MEADOWS INC 1,710.00 Greystone Construction Co.700-1316-4702 26,246.75 4/16/2025 Fuel Canopy Pay App #1 Greystone Construction Co.720-1316-4702 26,246.75 4/16/2025 Fuel Canopy Pay App #1 Greystone Construction Co.402-1316-4702 52,493.51 4/16/2025 Fuel Canopy Pay App #1 Greystone Construction Co.701-1316-4702 26,246.75 4/16/2025 Fuel Canopy Pay App #1 131,233.76 4/16/2025 Greystone Construction Co. 131,233.76 GS DIRECT INC 101-1120-4110 748.09 4/16/2025 Plotter Ink and Paper 748.09 4/16/2025 GS DIRECT INC 748.09 HALLOCK COMPANY 701-0000-4551 54.27 4/10/2025 lift station #28 supplies 54.27 4/10/2025 HALLOCK COMPANY 54.27 Health Strategies 101-1220-4352 130.00 4/10/2025 Medical Exam 130.00 4/10/2025 Health Strategies 130.00 HealthPartners, Inc.701-0000-2013 336.40 4/16/2025 Dental Insurance-May AP - Check Detail (4/18/2025)Page 11 of 21 80 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2013 288.33 4/16/2025 Dental Insurance-May HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 67,550.73 4/16/2025 Health Insurance-May HealthPartners, Inc.701-0000-2012 4,119.74 4/16/2025 Health Insurance-May HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2013 4,132.40 4/16/2025 Dental Insurance-May HealthPartners, Inc.720-0000-2013 96.08 4/16/2025 Dental Insurance-May HealthPartners, Inc.700-0000-2012 6,001.18 4/16/2025 Health Insurance-May HealthPartners, Inc.720-0000-2012 1,297.56 4/16/2025 Health Insurance-May HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 1,232.67 4/16/2025 Health Insurance-May HealthPartners, Inc.700-0000-2013 384.44 4/16/2025 Dental Insurance-May 85,439.53 4/16/2025 HealthPartners, Inc. 85,439.53 Holt Tour and Charter Inc 101-1560-4349 850.00 4/10/2025 Holt Bus to Plymouth Playhouse 850.00 4/10/2025 Holt Tour and Charter Inc 850.00 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 112 101-1530-4320 4,500.65 4/16/2025 Jan-March Electric INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 112 101-1530-4321 5,663.63 4/16/2025 Jan-Mar Natural Gas INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 112 101-1530-4322 1,192.13 4/16/2025 Jan-Mar Sewer/water 11,356.41 4/16/2025 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 112 11,356.41 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1120-4110 118.94 4/10/2025 Paper Envelopes Tape Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1110-4372 71.70 4/10/2025 Bottled Water 190.64 4/10/2025 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1120-4110 162.24 4/16/2025 Pens (for Ben) Batteries Paper 162.24 4/16/2025 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 352.88 AP - Check Detail (4/18/2025)Page 12 of 21 81 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Jasper Engineering & Equipment Co 700-0000-4300 3,881.10 4/10/2025 supports for well 3,881.10 4/10/2025 Jasper Engineering & Equipment Co 3,881.10 Kenzie William 101-1560-4342 2,700.00 4/10/2025 Plymouth Playhouse 37 Postcards dinner theater tickets 2,700.00 4/10/2025 Kenzie William 2,700.00 KORTERRA INC 701-0000-4220 1,250.00 4/16/2025 Utility Locating service KORTERRA INC 700-0000-4220 1,250.00 4/16/2025 Utility Locating service 2,500.00 4/16/2025 KORTERRA INC 2,500.00 Lano Equipment 101-1320-4120 235.27 4/10/2025 filters 235.27 4/10/2025 Lano Equipment 235.27 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 101-1120-4370 425.00 4/10/2025 LMC Annual Conference-Hokkanen 425.00 4/10/2025 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 425.00 Loch Monster Plumbing, LLC 700-0000-4550 1,823.65 4/10/2025 rebuild backflow assembly 1,823.65 4/10/2025 Loch Monster Plumbing, LLC 1,823.65 AP - Check Detail (4/18/2025)Page 13 of 21 82 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P 101-1110-4312 3,333.33 4/16/2025 Lobbying services-April 3,333.33 4/16/2025 Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P 3,333.33 Marco Inc 720-0000-4410 50.50 4/15/2025 Copier Lease Marco Inc 701-0000-4410 101.00 4/15/2025 Copier Lease Marco Inc 700-0000-4410 101.00 4/15/2025 Copier Lease Marco Inc 101-1170-4410 757.50 4/15/2025 Copier Lease 1,010.00 4/15/2025 Marco Inc 1,010.00 Martin Sophia 101-1539-4343 91.00 4/16/2025 Art Class 91.00 4/16/2025 Martin Sophia 91.00 Maus Kerry 101-1539-4343 375.00 4/10/2025 Line Dancing Class 375.00 4/10/2025 Maus Kerry 375.00 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 701-0000-4140 26.00 4/16/2025 Spray Paint MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 700-0000-4120 21.58 4/16/2025 Sharkbite Conn 3/4 Coupling MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 701-0000-4150 20.98 4/16/2025 Cable Tie Map pro gas MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 700-7043-4150 47.96 4/16/2025 Street Elbow Hot Water Nozzle MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1550-4120 252.79 4/16/2025 Hose Torch Bit set sprayer cement MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1320-4150 229.39 4/16/2025 Tape barcode Caution Locks MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 101-1350-4120 12.95 4/16/2025 Fuse Replacement Mini MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 700-0000-4150 54.53 4/16/2025 Cable Tie Map Pro Gas Conduit 666.18 4/16/2025 AP - Check Detail (4/18/2025)Page 14 of 21 83 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 666.18 Metronet Holdings, LLC 700-7043-4310 56.47 4/15/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges Metronet Holdings, LLC 101-1190-4310 105.75 4/15/2025 Telephone & Communication Charges 162.22 4/15/2025 Metronet Holdings, LLC 162.22 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 701-0000-4509 241,707.34 4/16/2025 Wastewater services-May 241,707.34 4/16/2025 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 241,707.34 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 101-1250-3816 -24.85 4/10/2025 March 2025 SAC Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 701-0000-2023 2,485.00 4/10/2025 March 2025 SAC 2,460.15 4/10/2025 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 2,460.15 Midwest Electric Generator 101-1250-3305 64.00 4/16/2025 Permit Refund - 3748 Landings Dr - 2025-00400 64.00 4/16/2025 Midwest Electric Generator 64.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 700-0000-4370 23.00 4/15/2025 Water Operator - Gillen 23.00 4/15/2025 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 23.00 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 101-1250-3818 -38.98 4/10/2025 March 2025 Surcharge MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 101-0000-2022 1,949.23 4/10/2025 March 2025 Surcharge AP - Check Detail (4/18/2025)Page 15 of 21 84 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 1,910.25 4/10/2025 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 1,910.25 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 289.53 4/15/2025 Electric Charges 289.53 4/15/2025 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 289.53 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 101-1550-4120 786.13 4/16/2025 mower parts 786.13 4/16/2025 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 786.13 New Look Contracting, Inc 720-7207-4570 4,153.02 4/10/2025 rec center stormwater/driveway improvement New Look Contracting, Inc 601-6062-4751 4,153.02 4/10/2025 rec center stormwater/driveway improvement 8,306.04 4/10/2025 New Look Contracting, Inc 8,306.04 NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 701-0000-4320 2,725.20 4/15/2025 Electric Charges NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 101-1350-4320 103.86 4/15/2025 Electric Charges NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 700-0000-4320 4,950.94 4/15/2025 Electric Charges 7,780.00 4/15/2025 NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 7,780.00 Nuss Truck & Equipment 400-4108-4704 133,640.86 4/16/2025 2023 CIP - Plow Truck replacement 133,640.86 4/16/2025 AP - Check Detail (4/18/2025)Page 16 of 21 85 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Nuss Truck & Equipment 133,640.86 NvoicePay 101-1130-4300 715.64 4/16/2025 Payment Processing fees-March 2025 715.64 4/16/2025 NvoicePay 715.64 Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1220-4510 40.00 4/10/2025 Pest Control Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1190-4510 40.00 4/10/2025 Pest Control Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1550-4510 240.00 4/10/2025 Pest Control Pinnacle Pest Control 700-0000-4510 210.00 4/10/2025 Pest Control Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1312-4510 40.00 4/10/2025 Pest Control Pinnacle Pest Control 101-1170-4510 80.00 4/10/2025 Pest Control Pinnacle Pest Control 701-0000-4510 80.00 4/10/2025 Pest Control 730.00 4/10/2025 Pinnacle Pest Control 730.00 PRECISE MRM LLC 101-1320-4300 294.00 4/16/2025 AVL for plow trucks 294.00 4/16/2025 PRECISE MRM LLC 294.00 Premium Waters, Inc 101-1550-4120 4.32 4/16/2025 Lake Ann Shop Water 4.32 4/16/2025 Premium Waters, Inc 4.32 Rent N Save Portable Services 101-1550-4400 1,441.00 4/16/2025 Portable restrooms 1,441.00 4/16/2025 AP - Check Detail (4/18/2025)Page 17 of 21 86 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Rent N Save Portable Services 1,441.00 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 101-1190-4510 76.45 4/10/2025 Paint 76.45 4/10/2025 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 76.45 Sports Facilities Companies LLC 416-0000-4300 15,000.00 4/16/2025 Consulting for Bluff Creek Comm Ctr project 15,000.00 4/16/2025 Sports Facilities Companies LLC 15,000.00 Stericycle, Inc 101-1120-4300 296.33 4/16/2025 Shredding bin swap 296.33 4/16/2025 Stericycle, Inc 296.33 Street Smart Rentals LLC 400-0000-4705 44,424.00 4/16/2025 CIP 2 portable message board 44,424.00 4/16/2025 Street Smart Rentals LLC 44,424.00 Tandon Priya 101-0000-1027 400.00 4/15/2025 Easter event change 400.00 4/15/2025 Tandon Priya 400.00 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 101-1125-4300 212.50 4/16/2025 City Council Minutes 3.24.25 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 101-1125-4300 212.50 4/16/2025 Planning Minutes 3.18.25 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 101-1125-4300 212.50 4/16/2025 Planning commission minutes 3.25.25 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 101-1125-4300 212.50 4/16/2025 Planning Commission minutes 4.8.25 AP - Check Detail (4/18/2025)Page 18 of 21 87 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 850.00 4/16/2025 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 850.00 True Plumbing Solutions MN LLC 101-1550-4510 3,140.00 4/10/2025 Lake Susan - Toilet Repair 3,140.00 4/10/2025 True Plumbing Solutions MN LLC 3,140.00 TSG Server & Storage, Inc 101-1160-4205 3,048.00 4/16/2025 Veeam Backup Annual Renewal 3,048.00 4/16/2025 TSG Server & Storage, Inc 3,048.00 TWIN CITY SEED CO.700-0000-4150 213.00 4/10/2025 lawn seed TWIN CITY SEED CO.701-0000-4150 212.00 4/10/2025 lawn seed 425.00 4/10/2025 TWIN CITY SEED CO.700-0000-4150 360.00 4/16/2025 seed starter 360.00 4/16/2025 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 785.00 United Rentals (North America), Inc.101-1320-4370 990.00 4/10/2025 trenching shoring excavation training United Rentals (North America), Inc.701-0000-4370 907.50 4/10/2025 trenching shoring excavation training United Rentals (North America), Inc.700-0000-4370 907.50 4/10/2025 trenching shoring excavation training United Rentals (North America), Inc.101-1550-4370 1,155.00 4/10/2025 trenching shoring excavation training 3,960.00 4/10/2025 United Rentals (North America), Inc. 3,960.00 Unmacht Matt 101-1120-4381 492.80 4/15/2025 Mileage to Milwaukee WI AP - Check Detail (4/18/2025)Page 19 of 21 88 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 492.80 4/15/2025 Unmacht Matt 492.80 USA BLUE BOOK 700-7043-4160 587.35 4/10/2025 fluoride 587.35 4/10/2025 USA BLUE BOOK 587.35 VOELKER SUSAN & BRIAN 700-7204-4901 50.00 4/16/2025 WaterWise Rebate -Toilet 50.00 4/16/2025 VOELKER SUSAN & BRIAN 50.00 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 101-1312-4329 150.53 4/16/2025 Garbage Service-April Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 101-1611-4410 15.27 4/16/2025 FebFest invoice late fee postal service delay Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 101-1220-4329 117.58 4/16/2025 Garbage service-April Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 701-0000-4329 18.81 4/16/2025 Garbage Service-April Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 101-1550-4329 725.40 4/16/2025 Garbage Service-April Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 101-1170-4329 195.78 4/16/2025 Garbage service-April Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 101-1190-4329 369.60 4/16/2025 Garbage service-April Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 700-0000-4329 18.81 4/16/2025 Garbage Service-April 1,611.78 4/16/2025 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 1,611.78 WAYTEK INC 701-0000-4140 174.38 4/10/2025 supplies for new truck 312 174.38 4/10/2025 WAYTEK INC 174.38 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 700-0000-4150 280.00 4/16/2025 spoils AP - Check Detail (4/18/2025)Page 20 of 21 89 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 280.00 4/16/2025 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 280.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 700-0000-4303 606.00 4/16/2025 EWTP Biological Water Treatment Pilot Study WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 720-0000-4300 8,755.00 4/16/2025 2025 Water Resources Support Services WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 416-0000-4303 10,358.00 4/16/2025 Community Center Concept/Plat WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 101-1311-4306 4,663.50 4/16/2025 GIS Support Services WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 720-7025-4300 2,502.50 4/16/2025 2023 Pond Maintenance WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 720-7025-4300 5,243.25 4/16/2025 2024 Pond Maintenance WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 720-0000-4300 1,652.00 4/16/2025 2024 WCA Support Services 33,780.25 4/16/2025 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 33,780.25 WW GRAINGER INC 101-1170-4510 45.00 4/10/2025 Signs 45.00 4/10/2025 WW GRAINGER INC 700-7019-4150 29.97 4/16/2025 heat tape seal kit east plant 29.97 4/16/2025 WW GRAINGER INC 74.97 885,393.19 AP - Check Detail (4/18/2025)Page 21 of 21 90 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item Arbor Day Proclamation File No.Item No: D.5 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Jamie Marsh, Environmental Resource Specialist Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council proclaims May 3, 2025, as Arbor Day and May as Arbor Month." Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Operational Excellence SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Arbor Day Proclamation 2025 91 WHEREAS, Minnesota is at risk to lose millions of ash trees due to emerald ash borer and WHEREAS, A healthy tree canopy decreases temperatures along streets providing cooler spaces in the summertime for recreation and commerce and WHEREAS, About three-quarters of Minnesotans get their drinking water from the forested parts of the state; and WHEREAS, Shade from trees protects people from exposure to the sun’s UV rays and diminishes heat-related illness and WHEREAS, Trees reduce stormwater runoff and act as a filter, preventing sediments and pollutants from washing into waterways, and WHEREAS, Trees capture carbon from the atmosphere and store it in their trunks, roots and soil and WHEREAS, Minnesotans can help build resilient communities One Tree at a Time by planting and caring for trees and by using wood products to store carbon into the future. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Elise Ryan, Mayor of the City of Chanhassen, do hereby proclaim Saturday, May 3, 2025 as ARBOR DAY, and the month of May, 2025 as ARBOR MONTH. ARBOR DAY OFFICE OF THE MAYOR CITY OF CHANHASSENMayor Elise RyanDate: May 5, 2025 92 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item Award contract for the Pleasant View Road Improvements Planning Study File No.ENG 26-03 Item No: D.6 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION The Chanhassen City Council authorizes entering into a contract with Kimley-Horn and Associates to complete a planning study for the future Pleasant View Road Improvements project. Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY Pleasant View Road is in need of rehabilitation. The corridor also needs to be studied to determine what the best fit project consists of. Building off of the recent work completed as part of the federal RAISE grant application, this planning study will help inform the ultimate design and construction. The project is currently identified to begin construction in 2027 and will likely take multiple years to complete due to its length and complexity. BACKGROUND N/A DISCUSSION The Planning Study will include public outreach and communications with the public and City Council to inform the ultimate design layout for the corridor rehabilitation. 93 The contract is based on the city's standard template for professional services. BUDGET Since the ultimate project scope is unknown, a budget is not yet established for the project. After completing this study with Kimley Horn, the city will solicit competetive design proposals for the actual design. Funding for the project will come from the following sources: Municipal State Aid Funds Assessments Pavement Management Program (PMP Fund) Utility Enterprise funds Partnership Grants RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends award of the contract. ATTACHMENTS Pleasant View Road Preliminary Design - Proposal Professional Services Agreement Pleasant View Rd Kimley-Horn 94 kimley-horn.com 11995 Singletree Lane, Suite 225, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 612 315 1272 March 27, 2025 (revised April 11, 2025) Mr. Charles Howley, P.E. Public Works Director City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd, Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE:Proposal for Preliminary Design Services for Pleasant View Road Improvements Dear Mr. Howley, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (“Kimley-Horn”) is pleased to submit this letter proposal (“Proposal”) to the City of Chanhassen (“City”) for preliminary design services for the Pleasant View Road Improvements between Trunk Highway (TH) 101 and Powers Boulevard. The total roadway length of the project is approximately 1.85 Miles. This proposal includes engineering analysis and public engagement to determine the scope of the necessary improvements and the estimated construction costs for these improvements. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The City of Chanhassen is planning for improvements to Pleasant View Road from Powers Boulevard to Trunk Highway 101. The roadway is part of the City’s Municipal State Aid Street (MSAS) system; however, the existing roadway consists of a narrow cross section, with bituminous curb and no storm sewer with several tight horizontal curves combined with a substandard roadway profile which limits the number of vehicles that use the roadway and creates significant safety issues. In addition, the lack of a continuous sidewalk or trail provides no safe space for pedestrians and bicyclists. The City plans to reconstruct the roadway with a wider City standard cross section, improve the horizontal curves and roadway profile, and add a single continuous sidewalk/trail throughout the corridor. We understand the proposed improvements will include the following: · Reconstruction of approximately 9,800 feet of Pleasant View Road between Powers Boulevard and TH 101. · New and/or reconstructed sidewalk/trail along Pleasant View Road on one side. · Retaining walls as necessary to minimize property impacts. · Stormwater improvements including storm sewer and BMPs. · Minor water main (pending further investigation) and sanitary sewer improvements to support the roadway reconstruction. In December 2023, Kimley-Horn prepared a MnDOT Local Road Improvement Program (LRIP) grant application for the improvements to Pleasant View Road. In January 2025, Kimley-Horn also prepared a federal Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) grant application for the project. To further plan and prepare for construction of the Pleasant View Road improvements in 2027, the City has requested Kimley-Horn complete a preliminary design study for the project. 95 Page 2 kimley-horn.com 11995 Singletree Ln Suite 225, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 612 315 1272 SCOPE OF SERVICES Our proposed scope of services for the project is detailed below based on our understanding of the needs of the City. TASK 1 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT 1.1 Project Administration & Coordination Project administration activities will include the following: l Preparation of monthly invoices l Communication with City staff. We have assumed 16 hours of project coordination through preliminary design. General coordination of the project will include scheduling the following meetings: l Project Coordination meetings (up to 6) l Public open house meetings (up to 1) 1.2 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Functions (QA/QC) We will provide QC/QA effort for deliverables and functions throughout the project duration to achieve the delivery of quality products within the agreed upon schedule. 1.3 Project Schedule We will provide a schedule for the project and update it monthly. Task 1 Deliverables: Meeting preparation; monthly schedule updates; coordination of activities with stakeholders, submittal of monthly invoices. TASK 2 – PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT Our team will work closely with City staff to provide a seamless interface between the design and the public and agency involvement process. 2.1 Project Coordination Meetings We will schedule and lead periodic Project Coordination Meetings for the duration of the project. We will prepare agendas and meeting minutes for the project coordination meetings. Up to two Kimley-Horn team members will attend each meeting, depending on the items to be discussed. Based on our proposed schedule, we have assumed six (6) meetings. 2.2 Project Mailings Kimley-Horn will provide the City with a draft newsletter for mailing within four weeks of the open house meeting (up to 1). We have assumed that City staff will mail the final newsletter two weeks prior to the meeting. 96 Page 3 kimley-horn.com 11995 Singletree Ln Suite 225, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 612 315 1272 2.3 Public Open House Meetings Up to three (3) Kimley-Horn team members will attend up to one (1) in-person open house meeting. We will be responsible for preparing all display materials. We have assumed up to three (3) project layouts or design alternatives to be included in the display materials for the open house. We also will provide sign-in sheets, way finding and comment cards. The City will be responsible for arranging meeting locations. Following the meeting, we will document and summarize any comments received. 2.4 City Council Meeting Kimley-Horn will provide meeting materials and attendance as listed below for up to two (2) City Council meeting (or council work session). · Up to three (3) alternative Preliminary Design Layouts · Up to three (3) Engineer Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Task 2 Deliverables: meeting agenda and minutes; materials for meetings (sign-in sheets, comment cards, informational materials, and handouts); comment summary and draft responses; and public open house meeting notices. Cost estimates provided under Task 2 are included in Task 4. TASK 3 – BACKGROUND INFORMATION 3.1 Topographic Survey A Kimley-Horn subconsultant, Egan, Field & Nowak, Inc. (EFN), will provide a topographic survey for the project. Full topographic and utility survey limits will extend to the right-of-way limits of Pleasant View Road. The topographic survey will include the following: l Locate public utilities and record rim elevations (as located by Gopher State One Call/record plans). l Locate 4-inch diameter and larger trees and record diameter and type. l Provide 1.0-foot contours. l Provide base map on Carver County coordinate system showing improvements, contours, right-of-way and easement lines (per recorded plats, County Half Section maps, documents provided by City and available property corners). Kimley-Horn staff will conduct a field review of the project area to confirm the information in the base mapping and as-builts and to identify special project issues/concerns. We will obtain an understanding of the existing private utilities along the corridor through this field review and mapping information obtained through Gopher State One Call. We will review NWI maps to identify existing wetlands within the corridor; however, we have assumed that any field delineation to verify existing wetlands will be performed by others or be completed as a part of final design activities. 97 Page 4 kimley-horn.com 11995 Singletree Ln Suite 225, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 612 315 1272 3.2 Geotechnical Studies Geotechnical exploration and analysis will be performed by Braun Intertec (Braun), as a Kimley-Horn subconsultant, to inform the final design of the proposed improvements. Based on the proposed improvements, Braun has prepared a proposed geotechnical program for the project which will include 2 days of drilling: l 8-10 boring locations at 14.5 feet to 25 feet deep. Boring locations will be determined based on review of existing conditions and location of the proposed improvements. l Groundwater measurements will be recorded if present. Upon completion of the soil borings, Braun will prepare an engineering report that includes the following: l A CAD sketch showing the exploration locations l Logs of the borings describing the materials encountered and presenting the results of our groundwater measurements and laboratory tests. l A summary of the subsurface profile and groundwater conditions. l Discussion identifying the subsurface conditions that will impact design and construction. l Discussion regarding the reuse of on-site materials during construction. l Preliminary recommendations for preparing structure and pavement subgrades, and the selection, placement, and compaction of fill. l Preliminary recommendations for the design of retaining walls, stormwater pond design, and potential utility replacements with an estimated infiltration rate for stormwater BMP design. Braun Intertec will a obtain right-of-way permit with the City prior to beginning fieldwork. Task 3 Deliverables: Topographic survey in AutoCAD and PDF format; geotechnical engineering analysis and report. TASK 4 – PRELIMINARY DESIGN 4.1 Preliminary Traffic Study Kimley-Horn will review traffic operations and safety at up to two (2) intersections to support the preliminary design of Pleasant View Road. This task will involve the following: l Collection of 24-hour turning movement counts at the intersections of Powers Boulevard (CR 17) & Pleasant View Road and Chanhassen Road (TH 101) & Pleasant View Road. l Collection and summarization from the last 5 years of available crash data from MnDOT's crash database. l Analysis of the traffic operations in the existing conditions and future conditions of each intersection. l Initial recommendations regarding the Pleasant View Road approach geometry and intersection traffic control based on a review of the traffic operations and safety. 98 Page 5 kimley-horn.com 11995 Singletree Ln Suite 225, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 612 315 1272 l We will review historic daily traffic volumes from MnDOT and pertinent metrics from streetlight to identify likely percentage of cut-through traffic and vehicle speeds. Findings and recommendations will be summarized in a brief traffic memorandum. 4.2 Roadway Design 4.2.1 Preliminary Layout Alternatives After gathering existing conditions information and conducting the kick-off meeting, we will investigate the proposed roadway, stormwater pond locations and sizing, storm sewer trunkline preliminary design routing, water and sanitary utility grade adjustments, and retaining wall locations and sizing. We will prepare up to three (3) preliminary layouts for the road typical section. In conjunction with our traffic analysis, we will review options for trail crossings and lane configuration/turn lanes throughout the corridor. Upon selection of the preferred alternative layout, we will prepare a final preferred layout in plan and profile. The final preferred layout will include preliminary construction limits and right-of- way/easement needs. We will also prepare a typical section cross section exhibit. 4.2.2 Right of Way Acquisition We will prepare estimated right-of-way and easement areas for the final preliminary design layout. The draft easement roll will assume a standard unit cost for each easement type across the project for the purposes of the preliminary design estimate. The layout and roll will be submitted to the City for review and any comments will be incorporated into the final documents. 4.2.3 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost We will prepare up to three (3) design alternative concept level cost estimates and one of which will be progressed to a preliminary engineer’s OPCC. We will submit a draft OPCC and will provide an updated OPCC following one round of City comments. The OPCC will be prepared using a MnDOT Statement of Estimated Quantities format and show proposed cost splits. 4.2.4 Preliminary Design Report We will prepare a project design report in a memorandum format including the following outline: · Proposed Improvements · Summary of Public Involvement · Opinion of Probable Cost · Proposed Financing Plan · Summary We will submit a draft preliminary design report to City staff for review. After receiving comments and input from City staff, we will finalize the report and submit to the City in electronic (pdf) format. 99 Page 6 kimley-horn.com 11995 Singletree Ln Suite 225, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 612 315 1272 4.3 Conceptual Stormwater Design We will submit a conceptual level stormwater design layout including the grading for the anticipated stormwater facilities (up to 3), stormwater conveyances (profiles), and approximate BMP sizing for the MS4 permit. The OPC of these stormwater facilities and stormwater piping will be including in the overall project cost, under Task 4.2.3. Task 4 Deliverables: Preliminary Design Layouts, Right of way/Easement layout; Cost estimates and Preliminary Design Report. SERVICES NOT INCLUDED The following scope of services are not included: l Watershed Permit l Level 2 Wetland Delineation l Wetland Conservation Act/Section 404 US Army Corps of Engineers Permit l DNR Public Waters Permit l Final design plans and engineering services l Signal Justification Report or Roundabout Justification Report, traffic signal or roundabout intersection geometric design l Construction phase services INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT We shall be entitled to rely on the completeness and accuracy of all information provided by the City. We have assumed that the City will provide the following information for our use: l As-builts l Engineering standards l Stormwater Model (within the project area) l Base mapping and existing conditions information. GIS based information for the purposes of preparing the project base map. l Potential redevelopment – assumed the City will provide information on any potential redevelopment of the land uses in the project area for the purposes of the traffic study. SCHEDULE We will provide our services as expeditiously as practicable to meet a final agreed upon schedule. A preliminary schedule is identified below. Begin Project/Notice to Proceed April 2025 Collect Background Information May-June 2025 Preliminary Design June-August 2025 100 Page 7 kimley-horn.com 11995 Singletree Ln Suite 225, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 612 315 1272 City Council Meeting August 2025 Public Open House September 2025 City Council Meeting October 2025 Draft Preliminary Design Report October-November 2025 Final Preliminary Design Report December 2025 FEE AND BILLING Kimley-Horn will provide the scope of services identified in this Proposal on an hourly labor fee plus expense basis. The following is a summary of the estimated fees and expenses for the tasks identified in the scope of services. Estimated Work Task Amount Task 1 – Project Management $ 7,380 Task 2 – Public and Agency Involvement $ 15,505 Task 3 – Background Information $ 50,710 Task 4 – Preliminary Design $ 88,530 Reimbursable Expenses $ 7,500 Total Estimated Cost $169,625 A detailed spreadsheet identifying the estimated hours and costs for each task is attached for your information. Labor fee will be billed according to our current standard hourly rate schedule. Fees will be invoiced monthly based on the actual services performed and expenses incurred. If you concur with all the foregoing and wish to direct us to proceed with the services, it is our understanding that the City will prepare an agreement for our review and execution. This Proposal will serve as the scope or services, estimated cost, and schedule to be included in the work order. Fees and times stated in this Proposal are valid for sixty (60) days after the date of this letter. We appreciate the opportunity to work with City of Chanhassen on this project. Please contact me if you have questions or you need any additional information. Sincerely, KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Chadd B. Larson, P.E.Michael Kirsch, P.E. Vice President Project Manager Attachments: · Detailed Fee Spreadsheet 101 DETAILED ESTIMATED COST SUMMARY PLEASANT VIEW ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PRELIMINARY DESIGN CHANHASSEN, MN PREPARED BY: KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. TITLE PROJECT PROJECT DESIGN BRAUN SUB-EFN SUB-TOTAL TOTAL PRINCIPAL MANAGER ENGINEER ENGINEER CONSULTANT CONSULTANT COST HOURS 1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT 1.1) Project Administration & Coordination 4 12 $3,320 16 1.2) QA/QC 4 10 $2,950 14 1.3) Project Schedule 0 6 $1,110 6 TOTAL $2,200 $5,180 $7,380 36 2. PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT 2.1) Project Coordination Meetings (up to 6)6 12 $3,870 18 2.2) Project Mailings (up to 1)2 6 $1,270 8 2.3) Public Open House (up to 1)3 6 6 16 $5,385 31 2.4) City Council Meetings (up to 2)4 8 16 $4,980 28 TOTAL $3,575 $5,180 $1,050 $5,700 $15,505 85 3. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 3.1) Topographic Survey 8 10 $30,400 $33,300 18 3.2) Geotechnical Investigation and Report 4 6 $15,770 $17,410 10 TOTAL $0 $740 $1,400 $2,400 $15,770 $30,400 $0 $50,710 28 4. PRELIMINARY DESIGN 4.1) Traffic Study 4 16 18 24 $1,200 $12,010 62 4.2) Roadway Design 4.2.1) Preliminary Layout Alternatives (up to 3)10 30 60 220 $51,800 320 4.2.2) Right-of-Way/Easement Requirements 2 9 30 $6,715 41 4.2.3) Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (up to 3)3 15 30 $8,100 48 4.2.4) Preliminary Design Report 2 10 15 $5,025 27 4.3) Conceptual Stormwater Plan 2 8 6 12 $4,880 28 TOTAL $6,325 $16,280 $17,325 $47,400 $1,200 $88,530 526 PROJECT SUBTOTALS $12,100 $27,380 $19,775 $55,500 $15,770 $30,400 $1,200 $162,125 675 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES $7,500 PROJECT TOTALS $169,625 675 SUB-CONSULTANT EXPENSES EXPENSES 102 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT_Pleasant View Rd_Kimley-Horn PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 28th day of April, 2025, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ("Consultant"). IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The City retains Consultant for preliminary design services for the Pleasant View Road Improvement Project. 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents," all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Professional Services Agreement; B. Insurance Certificate; C. Consultant’s Proposal dated April 11, 2025 (“Proposal”). In the event of conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts, with Contract Document “A” having the first priority and Contract Document “C” having the last priority. 3. COMPENSATION. Consultant shall be paid by the City for the services described in the Proposal a not to exceed fee of One Hundred Sixty-Nine Thousand Six Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars ($169,625.00), inclusive of expenses. Services performed by Consultant shall be paid at an hourly rate in accordance with the Proposal, subject to the not to exceed fee. The not to exceed fees and expenses shall not be adjusted if the estimated hours to perform a task, the number of required meetings, or any other estimate or assumption is exceeded. Consultant shall bill the City as the work progresses. Payment shall be made by the City within thirty-five (35) days of receipt of an invoice. 4. DOCUMENT OWNERSHIP. All reports, plans, models, diagrams, analyses, and information generated in connection with performance of this Agreement shall be the property of the City. The City may use the information for its purposes. Any modifications made by the City to any of the Consultant’s documents, or any use, partial use or reuse of the documents without written authorization or adaptation by the Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk and without liability to the Consultant, and the City shall indemnify, defend and hold the Consultant harmless from all claims, damages, losses and expenses, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees, resulting therefrom. 103457 2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT_Pleasant View Rd_Kimley-Horn 5. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders, regardless of amount, must be approved in advance and in writing by the City. No payment will be due or made for work done in advance of such approval. 6. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services hereunder, Consultant shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provisions of services to be provided. 7. STANDARD OF CARE. Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a professional consultant under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement. City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of Consultant’s services. 8. INDEMNIFICATION. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, and employees, from claims, demands, actions, causes of action, including costs and reasonable attorney's fees, to the extent caused by the negligent performance of the services provided for herein. The Consultant shall not be held liable for the sole negligence of the City. 9. INSURANCE. Consultant shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect Consultant from claims under the Worker’s Compensation Acts, automobile liability, and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than: Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate Automobile Liability $2,000,000 combined single limit Professional Liability $2,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate The City shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability policy on a primary and non- contributory basis. Before commencing work, the Consultant shall provide the City a certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverage in a form acceptable to City. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains Consultant as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Consultant shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Consultant shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Consultant’s performance under this Agreement. City and Consultant agree that Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Consultant shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Consultant’s own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 104458 3 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT_Pleasant View Rd_Kimley-Horn 11. SUBCONTRACTORS. Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. Consultant shall comply with Minnesota Statutes § 471.425. Consultant must pay subcontractors for all undisputed services provided by subcontractors within ten (10) days of Consultant’s receipt of payment from City. Consultant must pay interest of one and five-tenths percent (1.5%) per month or any part of a month to subcontractors on any undisputed amount not paid on time to subcontractors. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) or more is Ten Dollars ($10.00). 12. CONTROLLING LAW/VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Carver County Minnesota. 13. MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Consultant must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event Consultant receives a request to release data, Consultant must immediately notify City. City will give Consultant instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Consultant’s officers’, agents’, city’s, partners’, employees’, volunteers’, assignees’ or subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 14. COPYRIGHT. Consultant shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or software license by reason of the use or adoption of any software, designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting therefrom. 15. PATENTED DEVICES, MATERIALS AND PROCESSES. If the Contract requires, or the Consultant desires, the use of any design, devise, material or process covered by letters, patent or copyright, trademark or trade name, the Consultant shall provide for such use by suitable legal agreement with the patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the City. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of any such patented designed, device, material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in connection with the services agreed to be performed under the Contract, and shall indemnify and defend the City for any costs, liability, expenses and attorney's fees that result from any such infringement. 105459 4 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT_Pleasant View Rd_Kimley-Horn 16. RECORDS. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records of hours worked and expenses involved in the performance of services. 17. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, or any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 18. WAIVER. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 20. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by the City for any reason or for convenience upon written notice to the Consultant. In the event of termination, the City shall be obligated to the Consultant for payment of amounts due and owing including payment for services performed or furnished to the date and time of termination. The Consultant shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon seven days’ notice to the City upon breach by City of any of its obligations under this Agreement. Dated: _______________, 2025. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: _____________________________________________ Elise Ryan, Mayor BY: _____________________________________________ Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Dated: _______________, 2025. KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. BY: _____________________________________________ ____________ Its: __________________ Daniel J. Coyle Vice President April 23 106460 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item Approve the Annual Renewal of Laserfiche Software Subscription Municipality Site license. File No.Item No: D.7 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Rick Rice, IT Manager Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves an invoice from OPG-3 for the annual Laserfiche Software Subscription Municipality Site license." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Operational Excellence SUMMARY Accept and approve invoice from OPG-3 for the annual renewal of Laserfiche Software Subscription Municipality Site license. BACKGROUND The city purchased the Laserfiche document management system in 2002 from Crabtree Companies for the long-term storage of documents required by government retention policies. It has been expanded over the years to include functionality for public viewing of documents, managing records retention, and integrating with other city applications as a central document storage resource. This software license and support services have been renewed annually thru OPG-3, formerly Crabtree Companies. Council approved the upgrade to the Municipality Site Subscription license through OPG-3 in 2023. This added full function client licenses for all staff and access to the full suite of modules including records management. The OPG-3 renewal invoice is attached. A second quote for the renewal was 107 obtained as per the city purchasing policy from Laserfiche direct. The renewal costs from OPG-3 were lower than the quote from Laserfiche. DISCUSSION BUDGET The annual renewal expenditures are funded in account 101-1160-4212. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council accept and approve invoice from OPG-3 for the annual Laserfiche Municipality Site Subscription license and support renewal from OPG-3 in the amount of $38,988.08. ATTACHMENTS Laserfiche Renewal Invoice - OPG Laserfiche Renewal Quote - Laserfiche 108 109 RichardRice From:Connie Webber <cwebber@opg-3.com> Sent:Monday, April 7, 2025 8:56 AM To:Richard Rice Subject:Re: Invoice 8747 from OPG-3 Inc. Attachments:Invoice 8747-CiChanhassen.pdf Thank You Richard for reaching out! Looks attachment failed toload. Here you go. Have agreat week, Connie Webber Connie Webber | OPG-3 Inc. | Finance Administrator 8030 Old Cedar Ave So | Suite #205 | Bloomington, MN 55425-1215 Email: cwebber@opg-3.com Direct: 651.233.5060 | Main: 651.233.5075 x101 From: Richard Rice <rrice@chanhassenmn.gov> Sent: Sunday, April 6, 2025 8:39PM To: Connie Webber <cwebber@opg-3.com> Subject: RE: Invoice 8747 from OPG-3Inc. There was noinvoice attachment tothisemail. Can youresend it? From: Connie Webber <cwebber@opg-3.com> Sent: Friday, April 4, 2025 3:50PM To: Richard Rice <rrice@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Invoice 8747 from OPG-3Inc. Dear Customer AP, Your new Invoice isattached. We appreciate your business and prompt payment. Ifthere isanother party oranAPemail, weshould direct this to, please letusknow. Our “Remit To” Address is: OPG-3Inc.- 8030 Old Cedar Ave So, Suite205 - Bloomington, MN 55425- 1215. Thank You! Connie Webber Connie Webber | OPG-3 Inc.| Finance Administrator 8030 Old Cedar Ave So | Suite #205 | Bloomington, MN 55425-1215 Email: cwebber@opg-3.com 1 110 Direct: 651.233.5060 | Main: 651.233.5075 x101 2 111 3443 Long Beach Blvd Long Beach, CA 90807 Tel: 562-988-1688, Fax: 562-988-1886 Quote Name: 1 year - (renewal) Product Family: Subscription - Business Sales Representative(s): David Di Staulo Cloud Datacenter: United States Support Type: Basic Support Months: 12 Quote Effective From: Apr 08, 2024 Quote Effective To: May 08, 2024 Status: Active Quote Total: $87,210.00 Quote Recurring Total: $90,000.00 Quote Recurring Discount Total: $2,790.00 Customer: City of Chanhassen 7700 MARKET BLVD CHANHASSEN, Minnesota 55317-8363 Subscription Code Product Charge Service Length Quantity List Unit Price Discount Discount Code List Line Total JSENF3B Business Users Subscription - Basic 1 yr 125 $660.00 3.10%NCPA $79,942.50 Tax (TBD)$0.00 Total $79,942.50 Cloud Code Product Charge Service Length Quantity List Unit Price Discount Discount Code List Line Total JSHDSB Direct Share Cloud - Basic 1 yr 1 $7,500.00 3.10%NCPA $7,267.50 JSHDSZB Subscription Direct Share - File Size Cloud - Basic 1 yr 200 Block Pricing $0.00 Tax (TBD)$0.00 Total $7,267.50 Grand Total $87,210.00 Quote total is not final. Final invoice may include tax. Prices are in USD. The prices provided are valid only for the customer noted for 30 days from the date of the quotation, unless a shorter promotional period for any component of the quotation is expressly indicate. Laserfiche shall have no obligation to sell or deliver products or services until a final order number and invoice have been issued. 112 RichardRice From:David Di Staulo <david.distaulo@laserfiche.com> Sent:Wednesday, April 9, 2025 11:17AM To:Richard Rice Cc:Will Talbot Subject:RE: City of Chanhassen Renewal Quote Attachments:1year Renewal.pdf HiRichard Here istherenewal quote foryou. Thanks! David DiStaulo | Solutions Consultant Office: 1.562.988.1688 x194 E-mail: david.distaulo@laserfiche.com Website: www.laserfiche.com Laserfiche RunSmarter WeareaCustomers’ ChoiceintheMay2024 GartnerPeerInsights ‘Voiceof the Customer’: ContentServicesPlatforms Reviews from yourenterprise peers – verified by Gartner Seewhatourusershaveto say Contribute areview today From: Richard Rice <rrice@chanhassenmn.gov> Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 11:05 AM To: David DiStaulo <david.distaulo@laserfiche.com> Subject: City ofChanhassen Renewal Quote Iaminterested ingetting arenewal quoteforourcurrent Subscription Municipality Site, 125-JSENF3B. Wehave renewed withourcurrent local VAR OPG-3forquite awhile butduetoourcity purchasing policy Iamrequired to have asecond quote. Inthepast Ihave requested this from SHI. Canyouprovide thisquote? Richard Rice IT Manager CITY OF CHANHASSEN PH. 952.227.1111 FX. 952.227.1110 1 113 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us ci.chanhassen.mn.us\] facebook.com\] twi?er.com\] 2 114 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item Award Contract: Commissioning Services for City Hall/Senior Center (Civic Campus project) File No.Item No: D.8 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION The City Council approves entering into a contract for Commissioning Services with Sustainable Investment Group (SIG). Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND Building commissioning is a quality assurance process that ensures a new building’s systems are designed, installed, tested, and operating as intended. It’s essentially a systematic check to verify that everything in the building—like heating, cooling, ventilation, lighting, and plumbing—is functioning properly, efficiently, and safely before the facility is fully occupied. The process helps identify and resolve any issues early, reducing costly fixes later and helping extend the life of building systems. In short, commissioning protects the city’s investment by ensuring the building performs as expected, supports energy efficiency, and provides a safe, comfortable environment for users. 115 DISCUSSION BUDGET The cost of the proposal is $35,280, with up to an additional $7,440 in reimbursable expenses. The budget for this item within the Civic Campus project is $50,000. Kraus-Anderson solicited three proposals and recommended awarded the contract to SIG. Other proposals received were from KFI ($56,100) and Dunham ($49,700). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Commissioning Services to Sustainable Investment Group (SIG). ATTACHMENTS SIG Commissioning Services Proposal - Chanhassen Civic Campus Professional Services Agreement 116 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN March 27, 2025 Prepared for: 117 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN TABLE OF CONTENTS QUALIFICATIONS SUMMARY SERVICES PROVIDED Engineering Services Fundamental Commissioning Quality Assurance SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE Professional Licenses The SIG Team Past Experience Anticipated Personnel References CASE STUDIES FINANCIAL AGREEMENT SIG Fee Proposal STATEMENT OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Scope of Services Agreement ABOUT SIG Our Story Mission | Vision | Goal Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Our Services CONTACT Asa Posner, LEED Fellow, LEED AP BD+C, O+M SIG | Vice President of Sales 612.541.7751 asa@sigearth.com 118 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN QUALIFICATIONS SUMMARY ustainable Investment Group, LLC (SIG) appreciates the opportunity to submit our proposal for Commissioning Services for the Chanhassen Civic Campus on behalf of Kraus- Anderson. SIG is a full-service sustainability consulting firm providing sustainability training for individuals, consulting for new construction and existing buildings, and engineering services to support energy and environmental efficiencies. SIG holds extensive experience with all major sustainability and wellness platforms, including LEED, WELL, and Fitwel. We have been recognized as a distinguished leader in the green building movement based on our LEED Proven Provider status. This honor is issued by the USGBC based on excellence in administering LEED projects. SIG will provide Commissioning services as defined within the RFP. We will ensure that the Fundamental Commissioning is achieved and have also provided scope and pricing for Enhanced Commissioning. The following represents SIG’s qualifications for this project: SIG’s engineering department owns the experience and qualifications to act as the Commissioning Agent for Kraus-Anderson at the Chanhassen Civic Campus project. SIG consists of individuals with extensive sustainability backgrounds within the development and construction industry. Our team of professionally credentialed and licensed engineers has performed Commissioning services for over 90 LEED projects comprising of approximately 25M SF. Our project experience includes new and existing Class A Office, Mixed-use, Residential, Industrial, Healthcare, Educational, and Retail. In most cases, we have performed the entire scope of work including LEED Consulting, Commissioning, and Energy Modeling. Overall, SIG has provided sustainability services for over 80 million square feet and has certified over 500 LEED projects collectively. Additionally, SIG has familiarity with both the Architect/MEP Engineer (BKV Group) and General Contractor (Kraus-Anderson), having worked on multiple projects with each firm. We will utilize this prior experience and knowledge to best serve Chanhassen Civic Campus project. s 119 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN RELATED LOCAL PROJECT EXPERIENCE –Specifically related to this project, SIG has the following related and local project experience: Project Name Client Location Size Highland Bridge LEED v4 BD+C Campus Ryan Companies St. Paul, MN 55 acres Marvella at Highland Bridge Senior Living Ryan Companies St. Paul, MN 341,873 sf Marvella at Highland Bridge Senior Living Phase II Ryan Companies St. Paul, MN 213,331 sf The Collection at Highland Bridge Multifamily Ryan Companies St. Paul, MN 199,002 sf 10 West End Ryan Companies St. Louis Park, MN 358,538 sf 7250 France Avenue ESG Architects Edina, MN 124,620 sf Lilia Apartments ESG Architects Lilydale, MN 228,770 sf Beltline Boulevard – Building 1 Sherman Associates St. Louis Park, MN 193,668 sf Beltline Boulevard – Building 3 Sherman Associates St. Louis Park, MN 193,668 sf Landmark Towers BKV Group St. Paul, MN 452,344 sf Lexington Station Apartments Alatus, LLC St. Paul, MN 249,530 sf Brooklyn Center Opportunity Site – MR Multifamily Alatus, LLC Brooklyn Center, MN 250,088 sf The Berkman Alatus, LLC Rochester, MN 424,627 sf 200 Central Alatus, LLC Minneapolis, MN 355,000 sf Von Wald Youth Shelter 180 Degrees Rochester, MN 12,000 sf The Broadway 45 North Group Minneapolis, MN 182,323 sf North Loop Green III Hines Minneapolis, MN 798,000 sf The Dayton’s Project Hightower Initiatives Minneapolis, MN 1.3M sf Baker Center Transwestern Minneapolis, MN 1.262M sf MSP Safety & Security Center Miller Dunwiddie Minneapolis, MN 95,000 sf MSP Terminal 2 Expansion Miller Dunwiddie Minneapolis, MN 144,546 sf Morgan Stanley St. Paul Morgan Stanley St. Paul, MN 10,817 sf Project Enhance St. Paul Port Authority St. Paul, MN 8,015 sf 3M Building 260 BWBR Architects St. Paul, MN 91,180 sf Allina Cambridge Hospital Renovation BWBR Architects Cambridge, MN 195,582 sf Carleton College Student Health & Counseling Building BWBR Architects Northfield, MN 21,187 sf Gustavus Adolphus College Nobel Hall of Science Kraus-Anderson St. Peter, MN 178,686 sf Minnesota Zoo Treetop Trail Snow Kreilich Architects Apple Valley, MN 945,246 sf Pohlad Offices Snow Kreilich Architects Minneapolis, MN 70,000 sf MSP Delta Modernization Michaud Cooley Erickson Minneapolis, MN 246,104 sf The Heights St. Paul Port Authority St. Paul, MN 112 acres Upper Harbor Terminal United Properties Minneapolis, MN 48 acres RBC Gateway JLL Minneapolis, MN 1.2M sf 300 First Avenue North JLL Minneapolis, MN 106,490 sf Fifth Street Towers Zeller Realty Minneapolis, MN 1,170M sf Wells Fargo Plaza City Center Realty Bloomington, MN 494,278 sf Target Field Minnesota Twins Minneapolis, MN 1.127M sf U.S. Bank Stadium MSFA Minneapolis, MN 1.761M sf 120 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN ABOUT SIG – Sustainable Investment Group (SIG) is a full-service sustainability firm providing education, consulting, and engineering solutions across all major sustainability and wellness programs. Recognized as a leader in the green building movement, SIG is a LEED Proven Provider, USGBC Gold Level Member, and ENERGY STAR Partner of the Year – Sustained Excellence. We have provided sustainability solutions for new and existing Class A Office, Mixed- use, Residential, Industrial, Healthcare, Educational, Retail, and Event/Entertainment properties. Our clients enjoy a one-stop solution for all their green initiatives. Our consulting department has experience with LEED, WELL, Fitwel, GreenGlobes, BREEAM, and many other sustainability platforms. Our Engineering department provides ENERGY STAR and city ordinance benchmarking, ASHRAE Level I-III Energy Audits, Fundamental + Enhanced Commissioning (Cx), Retro-Commissioning (RCx), Ongoing Commissioning, and Energy Modeling. We also provide clients with ESG and sustainability strategy including reporting to frameworks such as GRESB, GRI, and CDP, along with portfolio wide energy performance tracking. Finally, our Climate Investment Solutions team helps our clients leverage, stack, and monetize the federally- available dollars from the Inflation Reduction Act, PACE Financing, incentives/rebates, and RECs/carbon offsets. To date, our team of professionally credentialed and licensed consultants and engineers have successfully delivered 500 LEED projects totaling 80M SF, over 160 Energy Studies totaling 70M SF, over 60 Energy Modeling projects totaling over 10M SF, and over 90 Commissioning/Retro-Commissioning projects totaling over 25M SF. SIG supports over $34B in Real Estate Assets and provides Green Building services for 75M sf annually. 121 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN SERVICES PROVIDED Engineering Services Fundamental Commissioning Scope of Work SIG brings vast experience in the design, construction, and commissioning of new buildings. We continually focus on delivering additional value to our clients. At every stage during this project, we will perform Fundamental Commissioning services to make the Chanhassen Civic Campus a successful project. SIG’s scope includes organizing our processes into a phased approach. The following details each phase:  Schematic Design Phase – SIG will review the Owners Project Requirements and Basis of Design documents to verify the owner is well represented in their project goals and intent for the development. Provide commissioning specifications to be incorporated into the master specifications, such that the entire team is aware of their responsibilities when it pertains to commissioning activities.  Design Development Phase – The Design Phase Commissioning Plan will be developed to outline the roles and responsibilities of each team member and set expectations for the commissioning process. SIG will review the drawings to ensure they meet the intent of the OPR, BOD and specification documents that will lead to reduced operating costs through cross-disciplinary coordination.  Construction Phase – Site visits will be performed to verify equipment and systems are installed per the specifications and that everything is coordinated between disciplines for proper access, keeping in mind operations and maintenance. SIG will make sure that long- term efficiency and maintenance of the equipment is top of mind and that the Commissioning Plan is updated with all pertinent information.  Acceptance Phase – SIG will develop pre-functional checklists and witness equipment start-up. SIG will ensure that the systems are functionally tested for optimal performance and per the design documents and sequences of operations. As-built drawings will also be reviewed.  Training & Operations Phase - SIG will offer best practices to the facilities operations team. This service offering will give the on-site team a thorough understanding on how to operate the control system as well as the proper maintenance schedule and techniques. SIG’s Scope of Work is designed to perform all necessary operational items while controlling costs. SIG believes periodic site visits are required to complete the Scope of Work, and necessary to achieve the best possible results for the Chanhassen Civic Campus. As such, SIG’s Scope of Work includes two (2) site visits for construction observation during the project. An additional five (5) man hour days are anticipated for functional performance testing prior to substantial completion. 122 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN Fundamental Commissioning Process Systems to be Commissioned:  1 Indoor Central VAV Air Handler (AHU-1)  1 Rooftop VAV Air Handler  (3) Central boilers providing general space heat and snow-melting  Pumping plants associated with the boilers  (64) VAV boxes with hydronic reheat  hydronic in-slab snow-melt system  General ventilation and exhaust systems  Garage exhaust system.  Split system computer room air conditioning unit.  Mini-split heat pump systems.  (20) Misc cabinet unit heaters and horizontal unit heaters (some electric, some gas, some hydronic)  Perimeter hydronic fin-tube radiation system  HVAC DDC control system  Lighting and daylighting controls  Electrical service and distribution  Domestic hot water heaters, recirculating hot water pumps, and controls  Domestic water softening systems  Sump Pumps 123 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN Design Phase Owner’s Project Requirements / Basis of Design SIG is involved during the Design Phase to review the Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR), a document that will guide the design team to develop the Basis of Design (BOD) and subsequently the design documents. The OPR is the first and most important document during the design process for a building, as it sets expectations for the entire design team. SIG will review the OPR for clarity and completeness. Temperature setpoints, operating schedules, space use requirements and more will be reviewed during this process to ensure the goal of a high- performance building is achieved. It is important to make sure that key requirements for the project are communicated early and effectively. SIG is also available in assisting the owner’s team to develop the OPR if needed. We have developed OPR templates that are available to the team upon request. As the Commissioning Agent (CxA) on the project, SIG will also review the BOD against the OPR. This is the first step in the integrated design process where all disciplines coordinate to establish common goals and identify the Owner’s Project Requirements accurately and precisely in a document that is more detailed and in-depth in describing the high-performance building design. The goal is to produce a BOD that reflects a high-performance building that is safely maintainable, optimized for both energy efficiency and occupant satisfaction, where the staff is both trained and fully capable of sustaining the building’s performance via the required training documentation. Design Commissioning Specifications Commissioning specifications will be developed to adhere to formatting consistent with the architect of record’s specifications and include all required sections and sub-sections per the scope of work. All equipment listed in the scope of work will be included. The commissioning specifications will set the requirements for each Commissioning Team member and will allow for accurate cost estimating at this phase of the project. Design Phase Commissioning Plan Following the OPR/BOD review, SIG will develop the Design Phase Commissioning Plan, which outlines what is to be expected of the Commissioning Team (CxA, Owner, Architect, MEP Engineer of Record (EOR), General Contractor, etc.) and assigns roles and responsibilities. The Cx Plan is a live document and is updated at various stages of the project with current information as the project progresses through the construction and functional verification phases. Samples of pre-functional checklists and functional verification tests are included in the Cx Plan to help guide the contractors. This document is the first deliverable from SIG that identifies key dates and milestones such that commissioning tasks are integrated into the design and construction schedule. 124 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN SIG Issue Resolution Tracking Process SIG utilizes an online issue tracking software to manage issue resolution from design drawing reviews, submittal reviews to construction site visits and functional performance tests. The software allows for designating responsible parties and assigning due dates to address open issues. Issues can be organized in a multitude of ways including priority, responsible party, discipline, etc. Higher priority issues can be tracked first, and issues can be separated and distributed to each commissioning team member as applicable. This method allows for actionable management of issue resolution that improves the efficiency with which issues are addressed. In addition, commissioning team members can be granted access to directly comment on issues online, which allows for direct communication with SIG, saving time on multiple emails and distribution lists. The availability of the software online to all commissioning team members provides for a transparent process that benefits the owner. At each phase of the project, SIG can create easy-to-read reports to document the commissioning process. Design Reviews Design reviews will be performed. These reviews will focus on the OPR, BOD and project specifications that will have been approved by all members of the integrated design team. As a third-party reviewer, SIG will focus on coordinating all disciplines and ensuring their scopes of work are specified and clear. Explicitly, all commissioning requirements will be established and well-communicated throughout the Design and Construction phases such that contractors are prepared for the extra effort required to construct a high-performance building. 125 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN Construction Phase Construction Phase Commissioning Plan A Construction Phase Commissioning Plan (Cx Plan) is developed and shared with the Commissioning Team early in the Construction Phase. This Cx Plan adds to the Design Phase Cx Plan and details roles and responsibilities for site visits, submittal reviews, pre-functional checklists and functional verification tests. A Pre-Commissioning Kickoff Meeting is scheduled to cover the Construction Phase Cx Plan and set expectations for the general contractor and sub- contractors. The commissioning schedule is reviewed with the Commissioning Team such that Cx activities are being scheduled into the master construction schedule. SIG will be available for monthly meetings (or bi-monthly during construction, if needed) in order to be informed about construction progress and verify that the commissioning schedule is on track. As changes are made to the construction schedule, SIG will be flexible and adjust the commissioning schedule with the Commissioning Team as required, always striving to meet the original schedule and where feasible, expedite it. As part of the integrated design process, SIG will assist in coordination of the construction schedule with respect to the Cx tasks to verify all disciplines are communicating throughout. Construction Commissioning Specifications Commissioning specifications may be updated with any new information that is relevant for the construction phase, which was previously omitted. The commissioning specifications will set the requirements for each Commissioning Team member and will allow for accurate cost estimating at this phase of the project. Pre-Functional Checklists Pre-Functional Checklists and Declaration of System Readiness (DSR) will be developed by SIG to ensure equipment is installed per the specifications. SIG will also review the manufacturer pre- start and start-up checklists to ensure they are included in the Pre-Functional Checklists. Pre- Functional Checklists will be collected and reviewed as they are completed by the sub- contractors. Functional verification of equipment will not be scheduled unless all Pre-Functional Checklists have been completed, start-up of equipment has been witnessed by SIG, Test and Balance (TAB) has been completed, and final TAB report has been reviewed. Construction Site Visits Site visits will be scheduled as deemed necessary during initial construction progress. As many site visits as required to deliver the scope of work will be provided. SIG will complete walkthroughs of the construction site and identify issues with installation, equipment access and effectively contribute to the integrated design process to ensure general coordination amongst the disciplines. SIG will provide a Field Report following each construction site visit. 126 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN Construction Phase Master Issues Log Throughout the construction phase, SIG will maintain a Master Issues Log of any problems found during the site visits, utilizing the online tracking software. The log will include a detailed description of the issues, location, reference to the construction document with which there is a discrepancy, recommendation for resolution, a responsible party and supporting on-site images. The responsible parties will have a specified amount of time agreed upon during the Cx Kickoff Meeting (typically one week to 10 days) to respond with a resolution or intended plan of action. Issues will be tracked through the Master Issues Log throughout construction and meetings amongst the construction team (during site visits) will follow as needed to determine course of action and answer any questions that may arise. By the end of the construction phase, all issues will have been resolved with the intent to maintain the goal of a high-performance building. Review of Sequence of Operation (SOO) During the Construction phase, the MEP of record shall provide the Sequence of Operation (SOO) describing in detail how the various building systems are expected to operate. The SOO is the order of events the system undergoes to cycle itself on and off. Knowing how the systems will operate properly aids in determining where to start troubleshooting when the system doesn't operate properly. Where the system varies from its normal sequence is a major clue to any problems. SIG will provide a review of the SOO and comments to be addressed by the EOR team. Based on our previous experience, we find that including the engineering facility team in our SOO reviews and exposing them to the specific operation schemes their building will operate results in a smoother Cx process with respect to functional performance testing, equipment training and overall BMS operation. 127 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN Functional Verification Phase Functional Performance Tests Scripts (FPTs)- Drafts After SIG reviews the SOO, we will create a draft of the Functional Performance Tests scripts. The drafts will include all the necessary steps to test the various systems and will be provided to the EOR team, Controls Contractor and General Contractor for review after the SOO is finalized. SIG’s goal is to have the final FPTs within 4-6 weeks of the testing period, thus giving the Controls Contractor time to review and be familiar with the testing approach. Test and Balance Review The Functional Verification Phase is kicked off with a final check that Pre-Functional Checklists, start-up reports and Test and Balance have been completed and reviewed to meet the requirements of the Contract Documents. All systems and equipment should be 100% ready prior to scheduling functional performance testing. SIG will coordinate with TAB consultant to ensure all issues have been resolved and that the system has been pressure mapped for design and part load conditions. A thorough review of the TAB report will conclude SIG related activities with TAB and will be the precursor to testing. Subsequent to the aforementioned being verified, Functional Verification Tests are scheduled with the relevant sub-contractors (mechanical, controls, electrical, etc.) and all systems within the commissioning scope of work are tested and verified against their respective sequences of operation. As with the SOO, SIG will include the engineering facility team in our testing procedures and ensure that they are integrated with the Cx team to ensure smooth transition of operating knowledge of the building’s system from the contractors. Integrated Testing Process Functional Performance testing of HVAC systems will include a thorough review of equipment setpoints, sensors, written sequences, graphic control screens, alarm points and trending. Initial conditions are recorded in addition to tested conditions, such that they can be used as a reference during the Warranty phase in the future. All systems listed under the Systems to be Commissioned will be verified against design to ensure the goal of a high-performance building. Equipment and systems will be tested individually to verify design intent in preparation for integrated testing. Integrated testing will combine all disciplines and verify major equipment is coordinated and in sequence with one another. Retro-Commissioning Experience SIG’s added experience with 25M+ of Retro-Commissioning work gives us great insight on issues that arise during operation and maintenance of a building. Therefore, our focus during functional testing is not only to fulfil short-term goals of satisfying the sequence of operation, but also to make sure the operation is sustainable and easily understood by the future operators. RCx experience brings to the forefront the concept of balancing building efficiency with occupant comfort. 128 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN Functional Verification Master Issues Log Throughout the functional testing process, SIG will keep a record of all issues, failed tests and re- tests. One (1) retest will be provided as part of normal checkout, with further re-tests being considered outside the normal scope of work. Issues will be tracked in the Master Issues Log. The log will include a detailed description of the issues, associated equipment, reference to the sequence of operation with which there is a discrepancy, recommendation for resolution and a responsible party. The responsible parties will have a specified amount of time agreed upon during the Cx Kickoff Meeting (typically one week) to respond with a resolution or intended plan of action. Issues will be tracked through the Master Issues Log Throughout Functional Verification and meetings amongst the construction team will follow to determine course of action and answer any questions that may arise. By the end of the Functional Verification Phase, it will be the goal to have all open issues resolved in order to achieve the goal of delivering a high-performance building. If there are still open or pending issues, they will be incorporated into the System Re- Commissioning Manual and followed up with during the Warranty Phase. Training Plan Review / Implementation Operator training is very important, and SIG can provide guidance for this process to ensure the most effective turnover of equipment from contractors to the building staff. A detailed plan is developed to train building staff with instructions on how to maintain the equipment and their associated recommended re-testing schedules. Project Deliverables Fundamental Commissioning 1. Basis of Design comments during Design Development and Construction Documents 2. Owner Project Requirements comments during Design Development and Construction Documents 3. Commissioning Specifications at Design Development 4. Commissioning Specifications at Construction Documents 5. Commissioning Program and Procedures Manual 6. Submittal Review comments 7. Commissioning Test Results Reports 8. Issues and benefits log 9. Final Commissioning Report 129 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN Commissioning Software (CxAlloy) SIG recommends having a commissioning-focused OPR meeting involving the Owner, operations team, Design Team, and CxA. During this meeting, the space use requirements, anticipated systems, schedules, setpoints, sequences, and BAS user interface are all fully detailed. This will assist the design team and SIG during the design, design reviews, and functional testing. SIG will utilize a Commissioning software program, CxAlloy, to track every phase of the commissioning process. This includes meetings, design reviews, submittal reviews, site visit reports, construction checklists, issue logs, functional tests, and all other commissioning activities. CxAlloy will be available to BKV Group, Kraus-Anderson, the City of Chanhassen, and other project team members to have a real-time look-in at the project process. Please find sample images of the capabilities of CxAlloy software: CxAlloy Dashboard 130 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN Track Meetings 131 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN Real-Time Issues Log (Sortable) 132 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN Pre-functional Checklists + Functional Tests 133 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN Quality Assurance SIG provides proactive management and increased communication in the form of our Quality Assurance program. Fundamental to our QA program is our tiered approach with multiple checks and balances for advanced service and communication. As an experienced provider, SIG has developed and implemented best practices to effectively manage the commissioning process. SIG has a streamlined schedule of tasks to best move a project from an initial kick-off meeting to engaging the project team to, ultimately, submittal of our final deliverable(s). Within our project schedule, there are recurring onsite/virtual meetings amongst all vested parties. These proven techniques increase communication, simplify the process, and minimize oversights and providing clarity to all sustainability-related items. SIG’s overall project schedule and milestones apply to both the consulting and engineering teams ensuring top quality throughout the term of the project. As a full-service sustainability consultant, SIG provides both consulting and engineering in-house. Therefore, every project we oversee gains a minimum of two (2) members of our senior consulting and engineering staff as a part of the project team. This creates an environment of collaboration and support between team members and produces a greater level of accountability. We have project schedule milestones to work towards as well as internal QA/QC checklists to stay on track. Furthermore, by implementing this management approach, SIG creates a more client friendly program while offering a better performing sustainability partner. Finally, SIG’s corporate staff remains actively engaged in projects from start to finish. Each project manager on both the consulting and engineering team is directly accountable to the top levels of our organization. In fact, on a weekly basis, internal meetings are held to gain an understanding of progress, address challenges, and identify opportunities during the entirety of the commissioning process. 134 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE Professional Licenses SIG is comprised of a consulting, engineering, and ESG department. We perform all services in- house, including Consulting (LEED, WELL, and Fitwel), Commissioning, and Energy Modeling. SIG can complete the entire commissioning program for the Chanhassen Civic Campus project from start to finish. We possess first-hand knowledge of the expectations and methods utilized throughout the design and construction phases. To provide industry-leading expertise, our team maintains a diverse set of professional licenses and credentials. Every SIG employee has at least one credential. Our company’s employees collectively cover the following credentials:  LEED Green Associate  LEED Accredited Professional (AP) o LEED AP BD+C o LEED AP ID+C o LEED AP O+M o LEED AP ND o LEED AP Homes  LEED Fellow  WELL AP  WELL Faculty  WELL Assessor  Fitwel Ambassador  GreenGlobes Professional (GGP)  Living Future Accredited Professional (LFA)  Professional Engineer (PE)  Certified Building Commissioning Professional (CBCP)  Commissioning Process Management Professional (CPMP)  Certified Energy Manager (CEM)  BREEAM In-Use Assessor  TRUE Zero Waste Advisor  ActiveScore Accredited Professional (AP)  Building Energy Modeling Professional (BEMP)  Project Management Professional (PMP)  GRI Certified Sustainability Professional  Certified Passive House Consultant (CPHC)  GRESB Accredited Professional (AP) Additionally, SIG is a LEED Proven Provider, USGBC Gold level member, WELL Enterprise Provider, IWBI Keystone Member, and ENERGY STAR Partner of the Year: Sustained Excellence. We maintain excellent working relationships with all sustainability platform certification bodies and have direct contacts at each of the following: USGBC, GBCI, IWBI, CfAD, and the U.S. EPA. 135 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN The SIG Team 136 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN Past Experience: The following represents an appendix schedule of some current and past projects in which we have performed services in the past 10 years: Project Company GSF Description Location Services Performed River Park Block 14 Hines 320,000 Class-A Office Austin, TX Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning Riverwalk Mixed- Use Development Hines 1.93M Mixed-Use San Diego, CA Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning Linden Logistics Center PGIM 2.43M Industrial Linden, NJ LEED Consulting, Fundamental Commissioning, Energy Modeling MIRA Tower (160 Folsom) Tishman Speyer 441,000 Multifamily San Francisco, CA Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning One Rincon Hill Phase 2 401 Harrison Investor 485,000 Multifamily San Francisco, CA Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning SJSC Towers SJSC Properties 810,500 Multifamily San Jose, CA Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning 260 5th Street & 900 Folsom AGI Capital 527,000 Multifamily San Francisco, CA Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning 923 Folsom Rowe Consulting 139,000 Multifamily San Francisco, CA Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning Axiom Hotel Host Hotels & Resorts 75,000 Hospitality San Francisco, CA Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning Baker Center Transwestern 1.26M Class-A Office Minneapolis, MN LEED Consulting, Fundamental Commissioning, Energy Modeling 2100 K Street Blake Realty 156,000 Class-A Office Washington, D.C. LEED Consulting, Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning, Energy Modeling River West DCT 732,720 Industrial Lithia Springs, GA LEED Consulting, Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning, Energy Modeling North Satellite Business Center DTC 548,464 Industrial Buford, GA LEED Consulting, Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning, Energy Modeling UPS Austin Spinoff Facility KBD Group 276,669 Industrial Round Rock, TX LEED Consulting, Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning, Energy Modeling The Berkman Alatus, LLC 424,627 Mixed-Use Multifamily Rochester, MN LEED Consulting, Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning, Energy Modeling YMCA Atlanta YMCA Atlanta 57,000 Mixed-Use Atlanta, GA Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning, Energy Modeling 75 Howard Paramount Group 330,000 Mixed-Use San Francisco, CA Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning, Energy Modeling Hotel Indigo Chance Partners, LLC 60,000 Hospitality Tuscaloosa, AL LEED Consulting, Fundamental Commissioning, Energy Modeling New Orleans Jazz Market Redmellon Restoration & Development 12,546 Entertainment New Orleans, LA LEED Consulting, Fundamental Commissioning, Energy Modeling The Collection at Highland Bridge Ryan Companies 199,002 Mixed-Use Multifamily St. Paul, MN LEED Consulting, Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning, Energy Modeling Marvella at Highland Bridge Senior Living Ryan Companies 341,873 Senior Living St. Paul, MN LEED Consulting, Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning, Energy Modeling 137 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN 10 West End Ryan Companies 358,538 Class-A Office St. Louis Park, MN LEED Consulting, Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning, Energy Modeling Signia by Hilton at GWCC Gensler 911,400 Hospitality Atlanta, GA Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning Arm Hub Project Arm 143,000 Government San Jose, CA Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning Energy Modeling 3rd Special Forces Building US Army Corps of Engineers 55,000 Government Ft. Bragg, NC Fundamental Commissioning Health Care Benefits Exchange State of California 145,000 Government Sacramento, CA LEED Consulting, Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning The Dayton’s Project Transwestern 1.3M Class-A Office Minneapolis, MN LEED Consulting, Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning Bullis School Discovery Center Blake Realty 69,826 School Potomac, MD LEED Consulting, Fundamental Commissioning, Energy Modeling 60 11th Street RJT+R Architects 353,000 Mixed-Use Multifamily Atlanta, GA LEED Consulting, Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning KIPP Strive Academy KIPP Schools 45,000 School Atlanta, GA Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning, Energy Modeling Wells Fargo – National Wells Fargo 409,641 Office National We have performed commissioning on a national level over 19 projects. PNC Bank – National PNC Bank 100,000+ Bank National We have performed commissioning on a national level over 30 projects. Commercial Interiors Projects Multiple 600,000+ Office National We have performed commissioning on a national level over 60 projects. 138 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN Anticipated Personnel Corporate Oversight Nick Kassanis President LEED Fellow, LEED AP BD+C PE, CBCP (415) 823-3442 nickk@sigearth.com Kim Weiser Senior Vice President of Operations PMP (404) 324-3216 kimw@sigearth.com Local/Regional Contacts Asa Posner Vice President of Sales LEED Fellow LEED AP BD+C, O+M (612) 541-7751 asa@sigearth.com Monte Hilleman Vice President of Environmental Resiliency, Compliance, & Investment Licensed CRE Broker – MN (651) 604-3392 monteh@sigearth.com Commissioning Agents Project Lead Project Support Dylan Gu Energy Consultant LEED AP BD+C PE, WELL AP (347) 371-3724 dylang@sigearth.com Taylor Reeves Associate Energy Consultant (770) 597-8361 taylorr@sigearth.com Project QA/QC Shai Shaul Director of Commissioning LEED AP BD+C PE, CBCP, CEM (415) 309-9226 shais@sigearth.com SIG has a regional office in Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN. In addition to the anticipated team above, SIG will provide support for the Chanhassen Civic Campus project through our regional office. 139 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN References ESG Architects Laura Eder, AIA, LEED AP Partner | Sustainable Design Director Laura.eder@esgarch.com (612) 373-4697 BKV Group Alex Sawka Director of Mechanical Engineering, Partner asawka@bkvgroup.com (612) 373-0703 Ryan Companies Kaitlin Veenstra, NCARB, LEED AP BD+C, WELL AP Associate Director of Architecture - Sustainability Kaitlin.Veenstra@ryancompanies.com (630) 328-1158 Kirksey Architecture Catherine Callaway, AIA, LEED AP BD+C, ID+C Associate VP, Director of Sustainability & Building Performance catherinec@kirksey.com (713) 426-7564 Paramount Group Evin Epstein, LEED Green Associate Senior Vice President, Energy and Sustainability EEpstein@pgre.com (212) 237-3147 Hines Chad Engle VP Corporate Engineering chad.engle@hines.com (713) 966-7616 Bridge CRE Greg Walters Senior Director of Engineering Greg.Walters@bridgeig.com (404) 907-3100 140 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN CASE STUDIES CASE STUDY 1: 10 WEST END – ST. LOUIS PARK, MN Building Information: Owner: Bridge Investment Group Developer: Ryan Companies Architect: Ryan A+E 358,538 SF LEED v4 BD+C: Core & Shell Silver 2021 LEED v4.1 O+M | Arc Gold 2023 WELL v2 Core Gold 2025 10 West End is an 11-story, 360,000 sf Class A speculative office building in the West End business district of St. Louis Park, Minnesota. Developed by Ryan Companies, the building is located just four miles west of downtown Minneapolis with portions of the project extending into the city of Golden Valley. The building is the first speculative Class A office building constructed in over 18 years in the I-394 corridor. Building amenities include an active entrance lobby, progressive creative work environments, rooftop terrace, fitness center, ground-floor bike storage, lockers, showers, and outdoor balconies on every floor with views of downtown Minneapolis and the West End neighborhood. In addition, 10 West End is located adjacent to a new urban park and is close proximity to a wide range of transit options including mass transit and the Cedar Lake bike trail, a major artery of the Tree Rivers Park District regional trail system. The location offers walkable neighborhood amenities including restaurants, shopping, entertainment, multi-family housing, hotels. 10 West End offers flexible and efficient floor plates, best in class technology, and amply parking with an open-air parking deck. Significant native landscaping, walkable open space, and a rainwater cistern and retention/ infiltration are also highlights of the property. The building achieved LEED v4 BD+C: Core & Shell Silver certification in August 2021. SIG provided LEED Consulting, Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning, and Energy Modeling for this project. After being purchased by Bridge Investment Group, the property pursued and achieved LEED v4.1 O+M | Arc certification, upgrading the property to LEED Gold in July 2023. Finally, the building achieved WELL v2 Core Gold certification in March 2025, led by SIG’s WELL Consultants. 141 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN CASE STUDY 2: 333 N. WATER STREET – MILWAUKEE, WI Project Description Name: 333 N. Water Street Size: 360,475 SF Location: Milwaukee, WI Architect: Solomon Cordwell Buenz Owner: Hines Current Status: Construction Phase SIG Personnel LEED PM – Nicholas Rubenstein LEED QA | QC – Greg Patton Commissioning – Shai Shaul 333 N. Water Street is a 31-story, 333-unit luxury multifamily building located in the historic Third Ward district of Milwaukee, WI. The building is 360,475 sf and is the tallest building in the district, serving as a gateway to the area utilizing its central location along the river as well as the historic streetcar line. The building is designed to create a new public access point to Milwaukee’s RiverWalk and provide a connection to the adjacent Public Market. The project also includes approximately 10,000 sf of retail and restaurant space. The building contains units from studio-size to 3-bedrooms and penthouses. Amenities include a fitness center, co-working space, lounge, and outdoor pool deck on the 8th floor. Sustainability and efficiency is a paramount goal of the project. The project is currently in the construction phase and is pursuing LEED Silver certification under the LEED v4 BD+C: New Construction rating system. SIG is providing LEED Consulting and Fundamental Commissioning services for this project. 142 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN CASE STUDY 3: THE BERKMAN – ROCHESTER, MN Project Description Name: The Berkman Size: 424,627 SF Location: Rochester, MN Architect: ESG Architects Owner: Alatus, LLC Current Status: Complete SIG Personnel LEED PM – Asa Posner Commissioning – Jeff Stewart Energy Modeling – Dallas Terry The Berkman is a mixed-use luxury apartment community located at the intersection of 2nd Street NE and 14th Avenue SW at the Gateway District leading into downtown Rochester, MN. The property features 350 market-rate apartment homes, as well as 24,000 sf of commercial (retail/office) space. Early construction activities began in late summer 2017 and the project expects to be complete in mid-2020. The property, designed by Minneapolis’ well-known ESG Architects, acts as a catalyst to further the transformation of the 2nd Street Corridor into a greener, vibrant, pedestrian-friendly “Live-Work-Play” district. The 13-story tower will strategically step-down into rental townhomes which provides a smooth transition into the residential neighborhood South of the site. The Berkman will bring a sophisticated, intelligent living experience second to none. Residents will live a lifestyle that mixes casual comfort with a bit of glamour. With a prime location and abundant amenities, these luxury apartment homes provide upscale elegance in a historic neighborhood setting. On the ground level, the property is envisioned to feature restaurant and retail spaces surrounded by a vibrant pedestrian friendly streetscape along 2nd Street SW. In addition, the 2nd floor will provide additional office and retail spaces. Given its close proximity to St. Mary’s Hospital and situated on a high transit-oriented corridor, the Berkman is expected to attract a large number of tenants employed with Mayo Clinic and will appeal to guests from around the world. The impressive list of community amenities that Berkman will offer its residents include a 3rd story rooftop pool, fire pits, grilling stations, and an indoor sauna. Residents will enjoy unique work-from-home suites and private entertainment spaces. A state of the art 24/7 fitness center promotes healthy living; a heated, 4-season outdoor dog oasis and spa appeals to pet-lovers. The building is named after Daisy Louis Berkman Plummer, who was the wife of legendary Mayo Clinic physician Dr. Henry Plummer. Daisy Berkman ran a small laboratory to test patients' blood in the early days of the Mayo Clinic before marrying Dr. Plummer in 1904. A dedicated pianist, she founded what would evolve into the Rochester Symphony & Chorale Orchestra. She was also known for hosting weekly baked bean dinners on Sunday evenings for the doctors at Mayo Clinic. The project achieved LEED BD+C: New Construction Silver certification in December 2020. SIG provided LEED Consulting, Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning, and Energy Modeling for this project. 143 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN CASE STUDY 4: NORTH LOOP GREEN PHASE III – MINNEAPOLIS, MN Project Description Name: North Loop Green Phase III Size: 1,025,491 SF Location: Minneapolis, MN Architect: ESG Architects Owner: Hines Current Status: Substantially Complete SIG Personnel LEED PM – Asa Posner WELL PM – Bryce Gerritsen North Loop Green is a seven-acre, transit-oriented development on an urban site adjacent to Target Field, the home of the Minnesota Twins and the nexus of Minneapolis’ public transit system. The site is conveniently located within a block of the skyway system and the project consists of residential, office and retail components, as well as associated infrastructure and green space. The first two phases of the project included the Dock Street Flats apartment building and the heavy-timber-framed T3 office building. Phase III of the development includes a 36-story residential tower with 450 rental apartments – 360 of which are market rate and 90 as short-term rental – and a 14-story, 340,000 sf office building. The project will have a new “grand staircase” along with pathways and plazas that will connect it to the Cedar Lake Trail, and a large plaza will be located in front of the two towers that will feather gathering spaces for the community. There is also 15,000 sf of retail space located off the plaza on the ground floor of each building. One unique design feature is the “amenity bridge” that spans between the two buildings on the 17th floor of the residential building and the 14th floor of the office building. Within this bridge will be indoor/outdoor space to house a restaurant and amenity space for both buildings with stunning views of the downtown skyline. The project is currently in the construction phase and is pursuing LEED Silver certification under the LEED v4 BD+C: New Construction rating system. SIG is providing LEED and WELL Consulting services for this project. The entire project is pursuing LEED v4 BD+C: New Construction certification while the office portion is pursuing WELL v2 Core certification. 144 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN CASE STUDY 5: THE DAYTON’S PROJECT – MINNEAPOLIS, MN Project Description Name: The Dayton’s Project Size: 1.3M SF Location: Minneapolis, MN Architect: Gensler Owner: 601 W Cos. Current Status: Complete SIG Personnel LEED PM – Asa Posner Commissioning – Jeff Stewart The Dayton’s Project is a historic redevelopment in downtown Minneapolis, MN. Dayton’s was a department store founded in Minneapolis in 1902 by George Draper Dayton. The company is the parent company of Minneapolis-based Target Corporation. The original structure, built in 1902, was a six-story office building with Goodfellow’s store as the primary tenant. Two additional buildings were added in the 1930s to encompass roughly 1.3 million square feet of office and retail space. The building became the flagship Macy’s department store in downtown Minneapolis until its closing in 2017. The building was acquired by New-York based developer/owner 601W Cos. Partnering with the architect (Gensler), property manager (Transwestern), and General Contractor (Gardner Builders), the historic property is undergoing a $190 million renovation to provide 300,000 square feet of retail space across three levels (lower, street, and skyway) plus 900,000 square feet of shell office space on floors 3 – 14. Much of the retail space will include the Dayton’s Food Hall & Market, a one-of-a-kind experience curated by renowned chef Andrew Zimmern. Given the historic nature of the project, many building elements needed to remain according to historical preservation requirements, which can present a challenge from an energy and water savings perspective. SIG was able to locate several creative areas where additional LEED points could be earned. The project achieved LEED Silver certification under the Core + Shell rating system in May 2023. SIG provided LEED Consulting and Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning for this project. 145 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN CASE STUDY 6: BAKER CENTER – MINNEAPOLIS, MN Project Description Name: Baker Center Size: 1.26M SF Location: Minneapolis, MN Architect: RSP Architects Owner: Transwestern Current Status: Complete SIG Personnel LEED PM – Asa Posner Commissioning – Nick Kassanis Energy Modeling – Dallas Terry Baker Center is a connected four-building office complex located on one city block in downtown Minneapolis, MN. The Investors Building (13 stories), Roanoke Building (12 stories), Baker Building (12 stories), and US Trust Building (14 stories) make up the complex that also includes a covered parking garage and retail space on the ground and second floors. The second floor is connected to the Minneapolis skyway system. Originally started in 1926 and completed in 1968 and totaling 1,262,062 square feet, the project recently underwent a $25 million renovation and repositioning, pursuing LEED Silver certification. Overall, the scope of the construction included exterior storefront replacement and new curtain wall installation for Investors Building, exterior window replacement on floors 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8, first and second floor interior finish modifications, 9th floor restroom finish modifications, elevator lobby finish modifications on the 13th floor, a new fitness center, conference center space, a modified roof deck terrace, and the demolition and conversion to shell space of roughly 500,000 sf of tenant space. SIG provided LEED Consulting, Fundamental & Enhanced Commissioning, and Energy Modeling services for this project. Partnering with the owner/developer (Transwestern), architect (RSP Architects), and general contractors (JE Dunn and Gardner Builders), SIG had the expertise to take on a unique existing-building-to-shell-space renovation after a large tenant vacated nearly 50% of the building. This allowed for the building to pursue LEED certification under the Core & Shell rating system, successfully repositioning it for high-quality tenants in downtown Minneapolis. The project originally planned to pursue the base level of certification (LEED Certified), but SIG was able to work with Transwestern to implement several qualifications in new tenant lease agreements in order to take advantage of energy savings upgrades, which allowed the project to jump a level to LEED Silver. 146 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN CASE STUDY 7: THE COLLECTION AT HIGHLAND BRIDGE – ST. PAUL, MN Project Description Name: The Collection at Highland Bridge Size: 199,002 SF Location: St. Paul, MN Architect: Ryan A+E Owner: Ryan Companies Current Status: Complete SIG Personnel LEED PM – Gabby de la Vera LEED Support – Asa Posner Commissioning – Dallas Terry Energy Modeling – Dallas Terry The Collection at Highland Bridge (Lot 1 Block 3) Multifamily Project is the first market-rate building to be built on the former Ford auto manufacturing campus, now known as Highland Bridge, in St. Paul, Minnesota’s Highland Park neighborhood. The six-story, 199,002 sf mixed-use building contains 230 housing units at Ford Parkway and Cretin Avenue as well as a 51,000 sf grocery store. Within the City of St. Paul, the building is required to meet stringent sustainability standards including LEED Silver certification, Minnesota’s SB2030 Energy Standard, as well as the City of St. Paul’s “St. Paul Overlay”. Overall, the new Highland Bridge neighborhood will feature over 55 acres of public and open space, office and retail space, and residential options including affordable housing, senior living (including another SIG project – Blocks 6 & 7 Senior Living Project), market-rate apartments, single-family, condos, and rowhomes. Gathering spaces throughout the development will attract and engage the community. Iconic features and amenities will create a distinct sense of place, built upon the spirit of St. Paul. The overall site will be built with numerous master plan-level sustainability features including a carbon-free community (provided by Xcel Energy’s nearby hydro-electric plant and the Twin Cities’ largest urban solar array), a district-wide stormwater system that will capture 94% of total suspended solids and improve the capture of phosphorous by 75%, natural and native landscaping, and a minimum of 100 electric vehicle charging stations across the site. The Collection at Highland Bridge project achieved LEED v4 BD+C: New Construction Gold certification in January 2024. SIG provided LEED Consulting, Fundamental Commissioning, and Energy Modeling for this project. 147 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN CASE STUDY 8: MARVELLA AT HIGHLAND BRIDGE SENIOR LIVING – ST. PAUL, MN Project Description Name: Marvella Senior Living Project Size: 341,873 SF Location: St. Paul, MN Architect: Ryan A+E Owner: Ryan Companies Current Status: Complete SIG Personnel LEED PM – Asa Posner Commissioning – Dallas Terry Energy Modeling – Dallas Terry The Marvella Senior Living Project is a 5-story, 340,000 sf senior living facility to be built on the former Ford auto manufacturing campus, now known as Highland Bridge, in St. Paul, Minnesota’s Highland Park neighborhood. The complex is made up of two buildings that are connected via a 2nd story walking bridge over Mount Curve Boulevard. The 194,635 sf Block 6 building contains 143,450 sf of actual residential space, which includes 40 memory care units, 40 assisted living units, and 102 independent living units. The 153,217 sf Block 7 building contains 122,654 sf of actual residential space which is made up entirely of 145 independent living units. Both buildings contain high-class amenity space for residents, including a makerspace, gallery, golf simulator, entertainment rooms, and a pool. Within the City of St. Paul, the building is required to meet stringent sustainability standards including LEED Silver certification, Minnesota’s SB2030 Energy Standard, as well as the City of St. Paul’s “St. Paul Overlay”. Overall, the new Highland Bridge neighborhood will feature over 55 acres of public and open space, office and retail space, and residential options including affordable housing, senior living, market-rate apartments (including another SIG project – The Collection at Highland Bridge), single-family, condos, and rowhomes. Gathering spaces throughout the development will attract and engage the community. Iconic features and amenities will create a distinct sense of place, built upon the spirit of St. Paul. The overall site will be built with numerous master plan-level sustainability features including a carbon-free community (provided by Xcel Energy’s nearby hydro-electric plant and the Twin Cities’ largest urban solar array), a district-wide stormwater system that will capture 94% of total suspended solids and improve the capture of phosphorous by 75%, natural and native landscaping, and a minimum of 100 electric vehicle charging stations across the site. The Marvella Senior Living Project achieved LEED v4 BD+C: New Construction Gold certification in July 2024. SIG provided LEED Consulting, Fundamental and Enhanced Commissioning, and Energy Modeling for this project. 148 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN CASE STUDY 9: SALESFORCE TOWER CHICAGO – CHICAGO, IL Project Description Name: Salesforce Tower Chicago Size: 1.4M SF Location: Chicago, IL Architect: HKS Owner: Hines Current Status: Substantially Complete SIG Personnel LEED PM – Asa Posner WELL PM – Bryce Gerritsen Salesforce Tower Chicago, also known as “Wolf Point South”, is the third phase of the Wolf Point master plan – a three-phase development designed by Pelli Clarke Pelli – located on one of the last remaining riverfront sites in Downtown Chicago. Hines is developing Salesforce Tower Chicago in partnership with longtime landowner, the Joseph P. Kennedy Family. The 1.4M SF, 60-story trophy tower plans to be the most advanced and amenitized office building in Chicago. Amenities will include a club-quality fitness center with locker rooms and showers, a conference center with multiple configurations and capacity sizes, a tenant lounge, and approximately 25,000 SF of commercial retail space. The project is located at the confluence of the three branches of the Chicago River on the premier remaining riverfront site. SIG is providing the LEED v4 BD+C: Core and Shell and WELL v2 Core Consulting for this project, along with tracking the project’s construction carbon footprint using TrueCarbon. The project is tracking LEED and WELL Gold. 149 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN FINANCIAL AGREEMENT SIG Fee Proposal Please find SIG’s proposed pricing for Commissioning. We have included our base scope for Fundamental Commissioning. Commissioning Services Expected Hours Fee Estimated Reimbursables Fundamental Commissioning 196 $35,280 $7,440 *Above pricing is valid for 60 days upon receipt* Burdened Bill Rates Additional work performed outside of the predetermined scope of work above will be subject to the following burdened bill rates: Title ($/hr) Director $250.00 Senior $215.00 Midlevel $200.00 Junior $170.00 Intern $100.00 150 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN STATEMENT OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Scope of Services Agreement SIG’s fees are based in part on the assumed timeline of the project and will be valid for 60 days upon receipt. Please confirm acceptance of the following services as noted above and return to SIG as notice proceed. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. Please contact our office should additional information or further clarification be helpful. Kraus-Anderson Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN Commissioning Services Fundamental Commissioning □ Should Kraus-Anderson wish to proceed with the scope(s) outlined above, please reach out to SIG staff for contract execution procedures. 151 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN ABOUT SIG Our Story SIG was founded on the premise of promoting a better built environment. Initially, SIG was formed to provide education and training for Real Estate professionals seeking LEED credentials (i.e.: LEED Green Associate, LEED AP+, and/or WELL AP). However, through our working knowledge of sustainability programs and relationships developed through our training courses, we were afforded the opportunity to expand our service offerings to full-service Consulting, ESG, and Engineering Services. By offering solutions for all aspects of the green building movement, SIG represents a complete sustainability resource for the design, construction, and Commercial Real Estate industry. In our history, we have developed into a full-service sustainability company with clients across the nation. While we have experienced tremendous growth, our proudest achievement revolves around the relationships we have developed. Currently, we perform sustainability solutions for some of the largest and most reputable Commercial Real Estate and architecture firms. Our clients include SL Green, Paramount Group, JLL, Hines, Morgan Stanley, HOK, HKS, Perkins + Will, Gensler, ESG Architects, JLG Architects, 5G Studio, Studios Architecture, DLR Group, Ryan Companies, House + Robertson, Solomon Cordwell Buenz, BWBR Architects, Kirksey Architecture, Interiors Architects, and Alatus. 152 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN Mission | Vision | Goal 153 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion SIG is fully committed to enhancing diversity, equity, and inclusivity and shares these values with our clients and partners. As a testament to our commitment, SIG pursued and achieved a JUST 2.0 label from the International Living Future Institute (IFLI) in 2021 and recertified in 2023. JUST is a voluntary disclosure and transparency platform that measures the corporate social justice of an organization and provides metrics to help that organization improve social equity and employee engagement. It is effectively a “nutrition label” for socially just and equitable organizations. Organizations are rated on a zero to four scale in the areas of:  Diversity & Inclusion (non-discrimination, gender and ethnic diversity, inclusion)  Equity (pay scale equity, gender pay equity, living wage, family-friendly policies)  Employee Health (occupational safety, mental health and well-being)  Employee Benefits (happiness, benefit programs, continuing education)  Stewardship (responsible investing, volunteering, charitable giving, transparency)  Purchasing & Supply Chain (local control, local sourcing) As part of our JUST label, SIG maintains policies for:  Gender Diversity  Ethnic Diversity  Inclusion  Employee Engagement  Full-Time Employment  Pay Scale Equity  Living Wage  Gender Pay Equity  Physical Health  Well-Being  Health Care  Retirement Provision  Family/Medical Leave  Training/Education  Local Communities  Volunteering  Charitable Giving  Positive Products  Equitable Purchasing 154 SIG Commissioning Services Proposal Chanhassen Civic Campus Chanhassen, MN Our Services SIG is unique in that we support the sustainability movement in three (3) distinct areas: Consulting, Engineering, and Training. Our clients enjoy a one-stop, turn-key resource for all their sustainability needs. Our education programs assist real estate professionals in earning professional credentials such as the LEED Green Associate, LEED AP with specialty, or WELL AP. For buildings and real estate portfolios, we provide consulting services from initial LEED certification/recertification, administer LEED Volume programs, WELL and Fitwel Consulting, and ESG Services. Finally, our engineering department supports our sustainability initiatives by performing ENERGY STAR benchmarking, energy audits, Commissioning (Cx) and Retro- Commissioning (RCx), Energy Modeling and Net-Zero/Decarbonization studies, and outside air testing and calculations. The following image depicts all our services: 155 1 235088v1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (“Agreement” or Contract”) made this ________ day of ___________________, 2025 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN,a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and SUSTAINABLE INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, a Floridalimited liability company ("Consultant"). IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1.SCOPE OF SERVICES. The City retains Consultant to provide commissioning services for the City’s Civic Campus as more fully detailed in the attached Exhibit “A” (“Services Proposal”). The Consultant agrees to perform the services diligently and completely and in accordance with professional standards of conduct and performance. Consultant agrees to complete the Services within the timeline of the project. 2.COMPENSATION. Except for expenses as otherwise provided herein, Consultant shall be paid by the City for the Services a not to exceed fee of Thirty-Five Thousand Two Hundred and Eighty 00/100 Dollars ($35,280.00). The payment shall be paid upon completion of the project within thirty-five days of invoicing. The City will pay to Consultant reimbursable expenses, if any, within thirty-five days of invoicing. Reimbursable expenses will be capped at Seven Thousand Four Hundred and Forty 00/100 Dollars ($7,440). 3.DOCUMENT OWNERSHIP. All reports, plans, models, diagrams, analyses, and information generated in connection with performance of this Agreement shall be the property of the City. The City may use the information for its purposes. 4.CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders, regardless of amount, must be approved in advance and in writing by the City. No payment will be due or made for work done in advance of such approval. 5.COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services hereunder, Consultant shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provisions of services to be provided. 76 STANDARD OF CARE. Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a professional consultant under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement. City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of Consultant’s services. 7.INDEMNIFICATION. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees, of and from any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, 156 2 235088v1 including costs and attorney's fees, arising out of or by reason of the execution or performance of the services provided for herein and further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising hereunder. 8.INSURANCE. Consultant shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect Consultant from claims under the Worker’s Compensation Acts, automobile liability, and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than: Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 annual aggregate Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit Professional Liability $2,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate The City shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability policy on a primary and non-contributory basis. Before commencing work, the Consultant shall provide the City a certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverage in a form acceptable to City. The certificate shall provide that such insurance cannot be cancelled until thirty (30) days after the City has received written notice of the insurer’s intention to cancel this insurance. 9.INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains Consultant as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant is not an employee of the City andis free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Consultant shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Consultant shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Consultant’s performance under this Agreement. City and Consultant agree that Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Consultant shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Consultant’s own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 10.SUBCONTRACTORS. Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. Consultant shall comply with Minnesota Statutes § 471.425. Consultant must pay subcontractors for all undisputed services provided by subcontractors within ten (10) days of Consultant’s receipt of payment from City. Consultant must pay interest of one and five-tenths percent (1.5%) per month or any part of a month to subcontractors on any undisputed amount not paid on time to subcontractors. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) or more is Ten Dollars ($10.00). 157 3 235088v1 11.CONTROLLING LAW/VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Carver County Minnesota. 12.MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Consultant must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event Consultant receives a request to release data, Consultant must immediately notify City. City will give Consultant instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Consultant’s officers’, agents’, city’s, partners’, employees’, volunteers’, assignees’ or subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 13.COPYRIGHT. Consultant shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or software license by reason of the use or adoption of any software, designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting therefrom. 14.PATENTED DEVICES, MATERIALS AND PROCESSES. If the Contract requires, or the Consultant desires, the use of any design, devise, material or process covered by letters, patent or copyright, trademark or trade name, the Consultant shall provide for such use by suitable legal agreement with the patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the City. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of any such patented designed, device, material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in connection with the services agreed to be performed under the Contract, and shall indemnify and defend the City for any costs, liability, expenses and attorney's fees that result from any such infringement. 15.RECORDS. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records of hours worked and expenses involved in the performance of services. 16.ASSIGNMENT. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, or any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 17.WAIVER. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 158 4 235088v1 18.NONDISCRIMINATION. All Contractors and subcontractors employed shall comply with all applicable provisions of all federal, state and municipal laws which prohibit discrimination in employment to members of a protected class and all rules and regulations, promulgated and adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor will include a similar provision in all subcontracts entered into for the performance of this contract. 19.ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 20.NOTICES. All notices, demands or requests required or permitted to be made pursuant to or under this Agreement must be in writing and deemed valid if sent by registered mail, return receipt requested, or delivered by overnight delivery service providing written evidence of delivery, or by hand delivery by a reputable independent courier providing written evidence of delivery, addressed as follows: CITY:City of Chanhassen PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attention: City Manager CONSULTANT:Sustainable Investment Group, LLC Address: Telephone: Attention: Email: Either party may change the designated recipient of notice by so notifying the other party in writing. 21.TERM. This Agreement shall commence as of the Effective Date and shall continue in effect until the completion of the Services unless sooner terminated pursuant to Section 22 (the “Term”). 22.TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by the City for any reason or for convenience upon written notice to the Consultant. In the event of termination, the City shall be obligated to the Consultant for payment of amounts due and owing including payment for services performed or furnished to the date and time of termination. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] [Signature pages to follow] 159 5 235088v1 Dated: _______________, 2025.CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: _____________________________________________ Elise Ryan, Mayor AND:____________________________________________ Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Dated: _______________, 2025.SUSTAINABLE INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC BY: _____________________________________________ Name, Title 160 A-1 235088v1 EXHIBIT “A” Page 1 161 A-2 235088v1 EXHIBIT “A” Page 2 162 A-3 235088v1 EXHIBIT “A” Page 3 163 A-4 235088v1 EXHIBIT “A” Page 4 164 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item Remove No-Parking designation on Kiowa, Iroquois, and Huron Avenues File No.ENG 24-01 Item No: D.9 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council authorizes the removal of the No Parking signs on Kiowa Avenue, Iroquois Avenue, and Huron Avenue that were installed as part of the 2024 Street Improvement project." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Operational Excellence SUMMARY Due to the reconstructed streets being narrower than the typical city standard as part of the 2024 Street Improvement project, no parking signs were installed along one side of the street on Kiowa Ave, Iroquois Ave, and Huron Ave to allow for improved emergency response access. On December 12, 2024, A petition was submitted by some of the adjacent property owners to remove the no parking designation (petition attached). The City Council reviewed the item on two occasions: at their Jan 13, 2025, and April 14, 2025, work sessions. BACKGROUND N/A 165 DISCUSSION There are numerous reasons both for and against the single side no parking designation, and it ultimately comes down to a risk-based policy decision. BUDGET N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff's official recommendation is to leave the no parking signs in place but certainly understand the complexity and nuance of the decision. ATTACHMENTS Lifting of No Parking Petition Map 166 167 168 169 Streets included in the petition 170 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item Fire Station Rooftop HVAC Replacement File No.N/A Item No: D.10 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Councils authorizes a contract with SR Mechanical for the replacement of one of the roof top HVAC units at the Fire Station." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY The project consists of replacing one of the rooftop HVAC units at the Fire Station. The existing unit is original to the building and is beyond its useful service life with no replacement parts available for minor repairs. This unit serves the main kitchen, dining, lounge area of the building. The contract is the city's standard template modified for the specifics of this project. BACKGROUND N/A DISCUSSION N/A 171 BUDGET This replacement is in the 5-Yr Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for 2025 with a budget of $30,000. Multiple quotes were received with the low quote from SR Mechanical of $21,750. They have completed previous work for the city with satisfactory results. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the contract. ATTACHMENTS Contract SR Mechanical Fire Station RTU CIP MBFire-048 172 f878aac7104cbdfe285685363543a9b39e7bbe829b6c756d5c70b92db99 1 NON-BID CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF GOODS AND SERVICES AGREEMENT made this 21st day of April 2025, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and SR mechanical inc. a Minnesota Corporation ("Contractor"). IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the “Contract Documents,” all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Agreement. B. Request for Proposal dated__ May 04, 2024 . C. Contractor’s Quote dated February 27, 2025 . D. Contract start Date April 21, 2025 In the event of a conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts. Contract Document “A” has the first priority and Contract Document “C” has the last priority. 2. CONTRACTOR OBLIGATIONS. The Contractor shall provide the goods, services and perform the work in accordance with the Contract Documents (“Work”). Contractor shall provide all personnel, supervision, services, materials, tools, equipment and supplies and do all things necessary and ancillary thereto specified in the Contract Documents. 3. CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS. A. Contractor has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents and other related data identified in the Contract Documents. B. Contractor is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local Laws and Regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. C. Contractor has given City written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that Contractor has discovered in the Contract Documents, and the written resolution thereof by City is acceptable to Contractor. D. The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work. 4. COMPENSATION. Contractor shall be paid by the City for the goods and services described in Paragraph 2 in accordance with the Quote, but not to exceed $ 21,750 is inclusive of reimbursable expenses. The fee shall not be adjusted even if the estimated number of hours to perform 173 f878aac7104cbdfe285685363543a9b39e7bbe829b6c756d5c70b92db99 2 a task, or any other estimate, assumption or matter is wrong or exceeded. Payment shall be made periodically after a service has been completed and within thirty-five (35) days of receipt of an invoice. 5. COMPLETION DATE. The Contractor shall complete the Work on or before May 20, 2025 . 6. WARRANTY. The Contractor shall be held responsible for any and all defects in workmanship and materials and upon notification by the City shall immediately replace or repair the defective workmanship and materials without cost to the City. The Contractor warrants that only new unused materials will be used. The Contractor further warrants to the City that all materials and services furnished under the Contract will be in conformance with Contract Documents and that the goods are of merchantable quality and are fit for the use for which they are sold. These warranties are in addition to any manufacturer's standard warranty, and any warranty provided by law. 7. RIGHTS AND REMEDIES. A. The duties and obligations imposed by the Contract Documents, and the rights and remedies available thereunder shall be in addition to, and not a limitation of, any duties, obligations, rights and remedies otherwise imposed or available by law. B. No action, or failure to act, by the City or the Contractor shall constitute a waiver of any right or duty afforded any of them under the Contract, nor shall any such action or failure to act constitute an approval of, or acquiescence in, any breach there under, except as may be specifically agreed in writing. 8. CHANGES TO WORK. Without invalidating the Contract, the City may, at any time, or from time to time, order additions, deletions or revisions in the work provided under this Agreement; these will be authorized by an amendment to the Contract. Upon approval of an amendment, Contractor shall proceed with the work provided under the amendment. Changes in the Contract Price shall be based upon the prices identified in the Quote provided or negotiated between the parties based on similar work provided in the Proposal. 9. UNAUTHORIZED WORK. Additional work performed without authorization of an amendment of this Contract will not entitle Contractor to an increase in the Compensation or an extension of the Contract. 10. DOCUMENTS. The City shall be the owner of all documents, reports, studies, analysis and the like prepared by the Contractor in conjunction with this contract. 11. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services hereunder, Contractor shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provisions of goods and services to be provided. 12. STANDARD OF CARE. Contractor shall exercise the same degrees of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a professional Contractor under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is 174 f878aac7104cbdfe285685363543a9b39e7bbe829b6c756d5c70b92db99 3 included in this Agreement. City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of Contractor’s services. 13. INDEMNIFICATION. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, and its employees, officials, and agents from and against all claims, actions, damages, losses and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, arising out of Contractor’s negligence or its performance or failure to perform its obligations under this Contract. Contractor’s indemnification obligation shall apply to subcontractor(s), or anyone directly or indirectly employed or hired by Contractor, or anyone for whose acts Contractor may be liable. Contractor agrees this indemnity obligation shall survive the completion or termination of this Contract. 14. INSURANCE. Prior to the start of the project, Contractor shall furnish to the City a certificate of insurance showing proof of the required insurance required under this Paragraph. Contractor shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, such insurance as shall protect Contractor and the City for work covered by the Contract including workers’ compensation claims and property damage, bodily and personal injury which may arise from operations under this Contract, whether such operations are by Contractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by either of them. The minimum amounts of insurance shall be as follows: Commercial General Liability (or in combination with an umbrella policy) $2,000,000 Each Occurrence $2,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Aggregate $2,000,000 Annual Aggregate The following coverages shall be included: Premises and Operations Bodily Injury and Property Damage Personal and Advertising Injury Blanket Contractual Liability Products and Completed Operations Liability Automobile Liability $2,000,000 Combined Single Limit – Bodily Injury & Property Damage Including Owned, Hired & Non-Owned Automobiles Workers Compensation Workers’ Compensation insurance in accordance with the statutory requirements of the State of Minnesota, including Employer’s Liability with minimum limits are as follows: $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Disease per employee $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Disease aggregate $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Accident The Contractor’s insurance must be “Primary and Non-Contributory”. 175 f878aac7104cbdfe285685363543a9b39e7bbe829b6c756d5c70b92db99 4 All insurance policies (or riders) required by this Contract shall be (i) taken out by and maintained with responsible insurance companies organized under the laws of one of the states of the United States and qualified to do business in the State of Minnesota, (ii) shall name the City, its employees and agents as additional insureds (CGL and umbrella only) by endorsement which shall be filed with the City. A copy of the endorsement must be submitted with the certificate of insurance. Contractor’s policies and Certificate of Insurance shall contain a provision that coverage afforded under the policies shall not be cancelled without at least thirty (30) days’ advanced written notice to the City, or ten (10) days’ notice for non-payment of premium. An Umbrella or Excess Liability insurance policy may be used to supplement Contractor’s policy limits on a follow-form basis to satisfy the full policy limits required by this Contract. 15. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains the Contractor as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. The Contractor is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Contractor shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Contractor shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Contractor's performance under this Agreement. City and Contractor agree that Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Contractor or any of Contractor's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Contractor shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Contractor's own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 16. SUBCONTRACTORS. Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. Contractor shall comply with Minnesota Statute § 471.425. Contractor must pay Subcontractor for all undisputed services provided by Subcontractor within ten days of Contractor’s receipt of payment from City. Contractor must pay interest of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month to Subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to Subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. 17. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, nor any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 18. WAIVER. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 176 f878aac7104cbdfe285685363543a9b39e7bbe829b6c756d5c70b92db99 5 20. CONTROLLING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 21. COPYRIGHT. Contractor shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or patent by reason of the use or adoption of any designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting there from. 22. RECORDS/AUDIT. The Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records of time and expense involved in the performance of services. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 16C.05, Subd. 5, any books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of City and Contractor relevant to the Agreement are subject to examination by City and Contactor, and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor as appropriate. City and Contractor agree to maintain these records for a period of six years from the date of performance of all services covered under this Agreement. 23. MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Contractor must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Contractor pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event Contractor receives a request to release data, Contractor must immediately notify City. City will give Contractor instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Contractor’s officers’, agents’, cities, partners’, employees’, volunteers’, assignees’ or subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 24. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by City on two (2) days’ written notice delivered to Contractor at the address on file with the City. Upon termination under this provision if there is no fault of the Contractor, the Contractor shall be paid for goods and services rendered and reimbursable expenses until the effective date of termination. If the City terminates the Agreement because the Contractor has failed to perform in accordance with this Agreement, no further payment shall be made to the Contractor, and the City may retain another Contractor to undertake or complete the work identified in this Agreement. 177 f878aac7104cbdfe285685363543a9b39e7bbe829b6c756d5c70b92db99 6 Dated: , 2025 CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager And: Elise Ryan, Mayor Dated: _April 23 , 2025 _SR mechanical By: Print Name: _Zach Nolan Its: Service Account Manager 178 Facilities - Fire Station HVAC Replacement Overview Request Owner Charlie Howley, PW Director/City Engineer Department Fire Prevention & Admin Form Type Capital Improvement Request Type Building and Facilities Project Number MBFire-048 Description The project consists of replacing one of the rooftop HVAC units at the Fire Station.  The existing unit is original to the building and is beyond its useful service life with no replacement parts available for minor repairs. Details Type of Project Replacement Location 179 Capital Cost Breakdown Capital Cost FY2025 Total Construction/Maintenance $30,000 $30,000 Total $30,000 $30,000 Capital Cost FY2025 Budget $30,000 Total Budget (all years) $30K Project Total $30K Capital Cost by Year Construction/Maintenance 2025 $30,000.00 $0 $8K $16K $24K Capital Cost for Budgeted Years TOTAL $30,000.00 Construction/Maintenance (100%)$30,000.00 180 Funding Sources Breakdown Funding Sources FY2025 Total Facilities Capital - Fund 402 $30,000 $30,000 Total $30,000 $30,000 Funding Sources FY2025 Budget $30,000 Total Budget (all years) $30K Project Total $30K Funding Sources by Year Facilities Capital - Fund 402 2025 $30,000.00 $0 $8K $16K $24K Funding Sources for Budgeted Years TOTAL $30,000.00 Facilities Capital - Fund 402 (100%)$30,000.0 181 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item Resolution 2025-XX: Call for the Assessment Hearing for the 2025 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 25-01 File No.ENG Project No. 25-01 CIP No. ST-012 Item No: D.11 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer Reviewed By Charlie Howley SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution calling for the Assessment Hearing for the 2025 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 25-01" Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY Call for Assessment Hearing for the 2025 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 25-01 to be held on May 12, 2025. The project has been bid and the next step for the project is for the City Council to host a Public Hearing and subsequently consider awarding the project to a contractor. BACKGROUND As part of the overall Pavement Management Program (PMP), the city annually plans to rehabilitate a section or sections of public streets across the city. The Five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) identifies the near-term streets to be rehabilitated. Key dates and items relative to this project: On June 14, 2024, the Engineering Department released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for design 182 and construction services for the 25-01 project. On July 22, 2024, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with Bolton & Menk for design and construction services for the project. On November 6, 2024, the Engineering Department released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for geotechnical services for the 25-01 project. On December 4, 2024, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with Braun Intertec for geotechnical exploration and engineering services in association with the 25-01 design contract. On January 27, 2025, the City Council called for a Public Hearing to be held regarding the proposed improvements on February 10, 2025. On January 28, 2025, the Engineering Department hosted an Open House meeting at the Public Works facility to discuss the project and respond to questions with the impacted properties. On February 10, 2025, the City Council accepted the feasibility study, conducted a Public Hearing regarding the improvements, and authorized the preparation of Plans and Specifications. On March 10, 2025, the City Council accepted the plans and specifications and authorized the advertisement for bids for the project. On April 11, 2025, Bolton & Menk and the Engineering Department hosted a bid opening. On May 7, 2025, the Engineering Department has scheduled a second public open house for the project at the City's Public Works Facility. Project information is available on the city's website at: https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/government/projects/street-projects/2025-city-pavement-rehabilitation- project There are currently 1,338 email addresses subscribed to receive project updates. To subscribe, residents and property owners should visit: https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/i-want-to/subscribe . DISCUSSION The approved plans and specifications were bid on April 11, 2025. Four responsive bids were received from contractors. The base bids ranged from $8,929,189.50 to $9,184,105.43. The Engineer's Estimate for the base bid was $8,714,999.50. There weren't any alternates bid with this project. The low contractor for the base bid was Ryan Contracting Co. Ryan Contracting has not performed a project for Chanhassen in the recent history that staff can recall. Bolton & Menk has worked with Ryan Contracting on other similar projects in the metro area. SCHEDULE 183 The remaining schedule for the project is as follows: Task Date Conduct Public (Assessment) Hearing and Award Project May 12, 2025 Begin Construction Mid to Late-May 2025 Substantial Completion Early November 2025 Final Completion June 2026 Assessment notices were sent out to all assessable properties per the required MS 429 process on April 24, 2025. The final assessment amounts contained within the notices were either calculated based on the low bid amount or based on the assessment policy revisions that are also being considered for approval at the April 28, 2025 Council meeting. The final assessment amount that was most advantageous to the property owners within each project area was utilized. The primary revision within the Assessment Policy is to implement a flat rate amount associated with each major street rehabilitation method. The proposed assessment amounts for each project area are as follows: Project Area Preliminary Assessment Amount Final Assessment Amount Conestoga Area (FDR)$4,502.00 $4,131.00 Northerly Portion of Frontier Trail (FDR)$7,894.00 $5,000.00 Southerly Portion of Frontier Trail, Del Rio, & Iroquois (Reconstruction) $15,393.00 $9,270.00 BUDGET The project is within the overall budget and the PMP fund is under the budgeted amount. Staff will be analyzing each utility enterprise fund to see if any additional cost savings can be made. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council adopt the Resolution to call for the Assessment Hearing for the 2025 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 25-01. ATTACHMENTS Resolution - Call for Assessment Hearing 25-01 135637 Bid Abstract 184 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: May 5, 2025 RESOLUTION NO:2025-29 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR THE PUBLIC (ASSESSMENT) HEARING FOR THE 2025 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT (CITY PROJECT 25-01) WHEREAS,Minnesota State Statute 429 regarding special assessments for public improvement projects requires City Council to officially set the assessment hearing date for capital improvement projects; and WHEREAS, the 2025 City Pavement Rehabilitation project bids were received on April 11, 2025; and WHEREAS, a public open house has been scheduled on May 7, 2025, ahead of the assessment hearing to review and discuss the proposed project improvements, assessments, and construction activity. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, that: 1.A public hearingshall be held on the 12 th dayof May, 2025, in the Council Chambers at CityHall at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessments and at such time and place all persons owningpropertyaffected bysuch improvements will be given an opportunityto be heard with reference to such assessment. 2.The cityclerk is herebydirected to cause a notice of the public hearingon the proposed assessments to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the public hearing and shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvements. The clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment rolls not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. 3.The owner of any property so assessed may, at anytime prior to certification of the assessment to the countyauditor, paythe whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the Cityof Chanhassen, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid byNovember 21 of the year the assessment is adopted. The propertyowner may at any time thereafter, payto the Cityof Chanhassen the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made.Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 ofthe succeeding year. 185 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 5 th day of May, 2025. ATTEST: Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 186 ABSTRACT OF BIDS* bid amount changed due to found calculation/addition error * bid amount changed due to found calculation/addition error2025 City Pavement RehabilitationCITY PROJECT NO. 25-01City of Chanhassen, MNBMI PROJECT NO. 24X.135637.000BID DATE:4/11/2025TIME:10:00 AM1234ITEM MNDOT APPROX.NO.SPEC NO.ITEMNOTESQUANT.UNITUNIT PRICEAMOUNTUNIT PRICEAMOUNTUNIT PRICEAMOUNTUNIT PRICEAMOUNTUNIT PRICEAMOUNTBASE BID:1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION 1 LUMP SUM $415,000.00 $415,000.00 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 $440,000.00 $440,000.00 $566,288.00 $566,288.00 $299,347.00 $299,347.002 2101.502 CLEARING 337 EACH $375.00 $126,375.00 $100.00 $33,700.00 $375.00 $126,375.00 $104.00 $35,048.00 $100.00 $33,700.003 2101.502 GRUBBING 337 EACH $275.00 $92,675.00 $50.00 $16,850.00 $72.00 $24,264.00 $52.00 $17,524.00 $50.00 $16,850.004 2104.502 REMOVE PIPE APRON (1) 11 EACH $300.00 $3,300.00 $500.00 $5,500.00 $350.00 $3,850.00 $455.90 $5,014.90 $500.00 $5,500.005 2104.502 REMOVE MANHOLE (SANITARY) (1) 1 EACH $650.00 $650.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $768.00 $768.00 $520.00 $520.00 $550.00 $550.006 2104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE (1) 49 EACH $350.00 $17,150.00 $800.00 $39,200.00 $330.00 $16,170.00 $503.42 $24,667.58 $550.00 $26,950.007 2104.502 REMOVE GATE VALVE & BOX (1) 42 EACH $225.00 $9,450.00 $800.00 $33,600.00 $289.00 $12,138.00 $265.20 $11,138.40 $150.00 $6,300.008 2104.502 REMOVE CURB STOP & BOX (1) 117 EACH $75.00 $8,775.00 $150.00 $17,550.00 $285.00 $33,345.00 $159.12 $18,617.04 $50.00 $5,850.009 2104.502 REMOVE HYDRANT (1) 17 EACH $300.00 $5,100.00 $800.00 $13,600.00 $346.00 $5,882.00 $423.28 $7,195.76 $650.00 $11,050.0010 2104.502 REMOVE SIGN (1) 23 EACH $100.00 $2,300.00 $50.00$1,150.00 $28.00 $644.00 $41.60 $956.80 $25.00 $575.0011 2104.502 SALVAGE CASTING 1 EACH $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $100.00 $100.00 $96.00 $96.00 $164.53 $164.53 $250.00 $250.0012 2104.502 SALVAGE HYDRANT 1 EACH $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $850.00 $850.00 $520.00 $520.00 $1,016.08 $1,016.08 $1,400.00 $1,400.0013 2104.502 SALVAGE SIGN 2 EACH $100.00 $200.00 $100.00 $200.00 $277.00 $554.00 $41.60 $83.20 $250.00 $500.0014 2104.502 SALVAGE MAILBOX 115 EACH $150.00 $17,250.00 $150.00 $17,250.00 $110.00 $12,650.00 $78.00 $8,970.00 $150.00 $17,250.0015 2104.502 SALVAGE PILLAR 1 EACH $100.00 $100.00 $500.00 $500.00 $554.00 $554.00 $329.12 $329.12 $250.00 $250.0016 2104.503 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) 685 LIN FT $3.00 $2,055.00 $10.00 $6,850.00 $5.00 $3,425.00 $4.68 $3,205.80 $5.00 $3,425.0017 2104.503 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) 7,040 LIN FT $2.00 $14,080.00 $6.00 $42,240.00 $3.00 $21,120.00 $1.82 $12,812.80 $2.50 $17,600.0018 2104.503 REMOVE WATER MAIN (1) 5,875 LIN FT $7.00 $41,125.00 $8.00 $47,000.00 $9.00 $52,875.00 $5.20 $30,550.00 $6.00 $35,250.0019 2104.503 REMOVE DRAINTILE (1) 220 LIN FT $6.00 $1,320.00$8.00 $1,760.00 $3.50 $770.00 $12.16 $2,675.20 $10.00 $2,200.0020 2104.503 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) (1) 2,325 LIN FT $10.00 $23,250.00 $10.00 $23,250.00 $17.00 $39,525.00 $29.72 $69,099.00 $15.00 $34,875.0021 2104.503 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (SANITARY) (1) 2,505 LIN FT$7.00 $17,535.00 $5.00 $12,525.00 $10.30 $25,801.50 $36.40 $91,182.00 $3.00 $7,515.0022 2104.503 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER (1) 4,910 LIN FT $7.50 $36,825.00 $4.00 $19,640.00 $3.40 $16,694.00 $7.96 $39,083.60 $12.10 $59,411.0023 2104.503 REMOVE RETAINING WALL (1) 10 LIN FT $50.00 $500.00 $30.00 $300.00 $145.00 $1,450.00 $47.67 $476.70 $25.00$250.0024 2104.503 REMOVE WATER SERVICE PIPE (1) 3,175 LIN FT $2.00 $6,350.00 $4.00 $12,700.00 $9.00 $28,575.00 $1.56 $4,953.00 $5.00 $15,875.0025 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (2) 22,630 SQ YD $4.00 $90,520.00 $4.00 $90,520.00 $4.50 $101,835.00 $2.31 $52,275.30 $3.12 $70,605.6026 2104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK (1) 1,500 SQ FT $5.00 $7,500.00 $1.00 $1,500.00 $1.00 $1,500.00 $1.63 $2,445.00 $3.05 $4,575.0027 2104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT (1) 7,880 SQ FT $2.00 $15,760.00 $1.00 $7,880.00 $1.00 $7,880.00 $1.88 $14,814.40 $3.05 $24,034.0028 2104.518 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY/ WALK (1) 23,860 SQ FT $1.50 $35,790.00 $1.00 $23,860.00 $0.70 $16,702.00 $1.01 $24,098.60 $1.52 $36,267.2029 2104.603 ABANDON WATER MAIN 725 LIN FT $10.00 $7,250.00$10.00 $7,250.00 $7.00 $5,075.00 $4.89 $3,545.25 $9.00 $6,525.0030 2104.603 ABANDON STORM SEWER 350 LIN FT $15.00 $5,250.00$12.00 $4,200.00 $38.00 $13,300.00 $19.27 $6,744.50 $12.00 $4,200.0031 2104.608 REMOVE & REPLACE GATE VALVE BOX SECTION (4) 2,200 POUND $10.00 $22,000.00 $5.00 $11,000.00 $9.70 $21,340.00 $4.16 $9,152.00 $6.00 $13,200.0032 2104.618 SALVAGE BRICK PAVERS (1) 1,195 SQ FT $12.00 $14,340.00 $10.00 $11,950.00 $7.00 $8,365.00 $4.49 $5,365.55$2.50 $2,987.5033 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON (P) 23,716 CU YD $14.00 $332,024.00 $20.00 $474,320.00 $18.00 $426,888.00 $19.95 $473,134.20 $29.56 $701,044.9634 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE 1,760 CU YD $22.00 $38,720.00 $15.00 $26,400.00 $20.00 $35,200.00 $21.57 $37,963.20 $31.76 $55,897.6035 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV) (P) 14,050CU YD $24.00 $337,200.00 $30.00 $421,500.00 $22.00 $309,100.00 $23.53 $330,596.50 $26.60 $373,730.0036 2106.507 COMMON EMBANKMENT (CV) (P) 3,673 CU YD $14.00 $51,422.00 $5.00 $18,365.00 $24.00 $88,152.00 $10.86 $39,888.78 $0.01 $36.7337 2106.507 STABILIZING AGGREGATE (CV) 1,760 CU YD $40.00 $70,400.00 $35.00 $61,600.00 $44.00 $77,440.00 $38.15 $67,144.00 $32.75 $57,640.0038 2106.601 RAVINE SITE GRADING & EXCAVATION 1 LUMP SUM $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $37,957.02 $37,957.02 $30,000.00 $30,000.0039 2106.602 POND DEWATERING (16) 3 EACH $10,000.00 $30,000.00 $10,000.00 $30,000.00 $8,000.00 $24,000.00 $0.01 $0.03$5,000.00 $15,000.0040 2112.604 SUBGRADE PREPARATION (P) 21,075 SQ YD $1.50 $31,612.50 $1.00 $21,075.00 $4.00 $84,300.00 $0.81 $17,070.75 $0.01 $210.7541 2118.507 AGGREGATE SURFACING (CV) CLASS 2 40 CU YD $50.00 $2,000.00 $50.00 $2,000.00 $152.00 $6,080.00 $121.11$4,844.40 $66.27 $2,650.8042 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) (3) 130 HOUR$180.00 $23,400.00 $150.00 $19,500.00 $165.00 $21,450.00$199.80 $25,974.00 $200.00 $26,000.0043 2130.523 WATER 140 MGAL $60.00 $8,400.00 $50.00 $7,000.00 $73.00 $10,220.00 $51.45 $7,203.00 $63.08 $8,831.2044 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 (P) 7,025 CU YD$38.00 $266,950.00 $40.00 $281,000.00 $50.50 $354,762.50$17.94 $126,028.50 $47.45 $333,336.2545 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION 21,550 SQ YD $4.00 $86,200.00 $8.00 $172,400.00 $5.50 $118,525.00 $8.41 $181,235.50 $2.85 $61,417.5046 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) 4,625 TON $95.00 $439,375.00 $89.50 $413,937.50 $94.00 $434,750.00 $88.72 $410,330.00 $90.89 $420,366.2547 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C) 4,625TON $80.00 $370,000.00 $81.50 $376,937.50 $85.00 $393,125.00 $82.48 $381,470.00 $81.76 $378,140.0048 2360.603 BITUMINOUS RAMP CURB EDGE 19,300 LIN FT $3.00$57,900.00 $4.25 $82,025.00 $3.60 $69,480.00 $3.15 $60,795.00 $4.25 $82,025.0049 2360.603 MILL OUT BITUMINOUS RAMP CURB EDGE 19,300 LIN FT $3.50 $67,550.00 $1.25 $24,125.00 $2.40 $46,320.00 $1.69 $32,617.00 $0.87 $16,791.0050 EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION (5) 72 HOUR $750.00 $54,000.00 $30.00 $2,160.00 $400.00 $28,800.00 $572.00 $41,184.00 $385.00$27,720.0051 PIPE BEDDING TYPE SPECIAL (9) 150 TON $75.00 $11,250.00$35.00 $5,250.00 $39.00 $5,850.00 $54.08 $8,112.00 $46.00$6,900.0052 2411.604 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL 200 SQ FT $80.00 $16,000.00 $65.00 $13,000.00 $110.00 $22,000.00 $57.46 $11,492.00 $55.25 $11,050.0053 2501.502 15" RC PIPE APRON 3 EACH $1,500.00 $4,500.00 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 $1,344.00 $4,032.00 $1,190.20 $3,570.60 $1,416.00 $4,248.0054 2501.502 21" RC PIPE APRON 1 EACH $1,750.00 $1,750.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,479.00 $1,479.00 $1,320.28 $1,320.28 $1,734.00 $1,734.0055 2501.502 24" RC PIPE APRON 3 EACH $2,250.00 $6,750.00 $2,500.00 $7,500.00 $1,554.00 $4,662.00 $1,524.95 $4,574.85 $2,000.00 $6,000.0056 2501.502 30" RC PIPE APRON 2 EACH $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $1,562.00 $3,124.00 $1,639.31 $3,278.62 $2,344.00 $4,688.0057 2501.502 36" RC PIPE APRON 2 EACH $4,000.00 $8,000.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $2,380.00 $4,760.00 $2,584.67 $5,169.34 $3,017.00 $6,034.0058 2501.502 44" SPAN RC PIPE-ARCH APRON 2 EACH $4,750.00 $9,500.00 $3,500.00 $7,000.00 $2,817.00 $5,634.00 $2,810.07 $5,620.14 $4,021.00 $8,042.00Bolton & Menk, Inc.Ryan Contracting Co.S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc.Valley Paving, Inc.Northwest Asphalt, Inc.Engineer's Estimate187 ABSTRACT OF BIDS* bid amount changed due to found calculation/addition error * bid amount changed due to found calculation/addition error2025 City Pavement RehabilitationCITY PROJECT NO. 25-01City of Chanhassen, MNBMI PROJECT NO. 24X.135637.000BID DATE:4/11/2025TIME:10:00 AM1234ITEM MNDOT APPROX.NO.SPEC NO.ITEMNOTESQUANT.UNITUNIT PRICEAMOUNTUNIT PRICEAMOUNTUNIT PRICEAMOUNTUNIT PRICEAMOUNTUNIT PRICEAMOUNTBolton & Menk, Inc.Ryan Contracting Co.S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc.Valley Paving, Inc.Northwest Asphalt, Inc.Engineer's Estimate59 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 15" PIPE APRON 3 EACH $750.00 $2,250.00 $3,600.00 $10,800.00 $607.00 $1,821.00 $583.69 $1,751.07 $654.00 $1,962.0060 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 21" PIPE APRON 1 EACH $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $800.00 $800.00 $1,024.00 $1,024.00 $983.62 $983.62 $1,016.00 $1,016.0061 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 24" PIPE APRON 3 EACH $1,500.00 $4,500.00 $1,300.00 $3,900.00 $1,358.00 $4,074.00 $1,304.29 $3,912.87 $1,332.00 $3,996.0062 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 30" PIPE APRON 2 EACH $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $1,800.00 $3,600.00 $1,696.00 $3,392.00 $16,268.57 $32,537.14 $1,625.00 $3,250.0063 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 36" PIPE APRON 2 EACH $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $3,100.00 $6,200.00 $2,333.00 $4,666.00 $2,241.08 $4,482.16 $2,205.00 $4,410.0064 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 44" SPAN PIPE APRON 2 EACH $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $2,262.00 $4,524.00$2,172.63 $4,345.26 $2,320.00 $4,640.0065 2502.503 4" PERF TP PIPE DRAIN 12,200 LIN FT $10.00 $122,000.00 $15.00 $183,000.00 $14.00 $170,800.00 $18.16 $221,552.00 $19.25 $234,850.0066 2502.602 4" TP PIPE DRAIN CLEAN OUT 60 EACH $275.00 $16,500.00 $300.00 $18,000.00 $434.00 $26,040.00 $637.89 $38,273.40 $302.00 $18,120.0067 2502.603 44" SPAN RC PIPE-ARCH SEWER CL IIIA 309 LIN FT $250.00 $77,250.00 $275.00 $84,975.00 $218.00 $67,362.00 $247.03 $76,332.27 $330.00 $101,970.0068 2503.503 12" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V 8 LIN FT $100.00 $800.00 $64.00 $512.00 $181.00 $1,448.00 $77.33 $618.64 $126.00 $1,008.0069 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V 2,697 LIN FT $70.00 $188,790.00 $65.00 $175,305.00 $72.00 $194,184.00 $69.20 $186,632.40 $63.00 $169,911.0070 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V 38 LIN FT $85.00 $3,230.00 $72.00 $2,736.00 $129.00 $4,902.00 $80.04 $3,041.52 $108.00 $4,104.0071 2503.503 21" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V 68 LIN FT $90.00 $6,120.00 $80.00 $5,440.00 $95.00 $6,460.00 $114.01 $7,752.68 $117.00 $7,956.0072 2503.503 24" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V 447 LIN FT $105.00 $46,935.00 $100.00 $44,700.00 $104.00 $46,488.00 $102.40 $45,772.80 $111.00 $49,617.0073 2503.503 30" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V 97 LIN FT $175.00 $16,975.00 $200.00 $19,400.00 $169.00 $16,393.00 $182.76 $17,727.72 $172.00 $16,684.0074 2503.503 36" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V 304 LIN FT $350.00 $106,400.00 $260.00 $79,040.00 $210.00 $63,840.00 $216.99 $65,964.96 $209.00 $63,536.0075 2503.601 TEMPORARY SEWER BYPASS 1 LUMP SUM $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $36,600.00 $36,600.00 $41,600.00 $41,600.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.0076 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLES (SAN) 1 EACH $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $3,680.00 $3,680.00$1,040.00 $1,040.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.0077 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER 27 EACH $1,750.00 $47,250.00 $3,000.00 $81,000.00 $1,038.00 $28,026.00 $1,227.17 $33,133.59 $2,000.00 $54,000.0078 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING FORCE MAIN 6 EACH $2,000.00$12,000.00 $5,000.00 $30,000.00 $1,255.00 $7,530.00 $1,560.00 $9,360.00 $3,209.00 $19,254.0079 2503.602 8"X6" WYE 54 EACH $600.00 $32,400.00 $500.00 $27,000.00 $925.00 $49,950.00 $4,037.28 $218,013.12 $1,772.00 $95,688.0080 2503.602 10"X6" WYE 20 EACH $750.00 $15,000.00 $1,000.00 $20,000.00 $1,163.00 $23,260.00 $4,283.76 $85,675.20 $2,002.00 $40,040.0081 2503.602 PROTRUDING TAP TRIMMING (ANY SIZE) 74 EACH $475.00 $35,150.00 $750.00 $55,500.00 $277.00 $20,498.00 $364.00 $26,936.00 $0.01 $0.7482 2503.602 LATERAL REINSTATEMENT (ANY SIZE) 74 EACH $100.00 $7,400.00 $250.00 $18,500.00 $277.00 $20,498.00 $260.00 $19,240.00 $0.01 $0.7483 2503.603 8" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 278 LIN FT $65.00 $18,070.00 $75.00 $20,850.00 $46.00 $12,788.00 $62.40 $17,347.20 $59.00 $16,402.0084 2503.603 6" PVC SANITARY SERVICE PIPE 2,680 LIN FT $40.00 $107,200.00 $45.00 $120,600.00 $38.00 $101,840.00 $59.28 $158,870.40 $69.00 $184,920.0085 2503.603 8" PVC FORCE MAIN 1,100 LIN FT $100.00 $110,000.00 $80.00 $88,000.00 $56.00 $61,600.00 $58.24 $64,064.00 $67.00 $73,700.0086 2503.603 CURED IN PLACE PIPE (CIPP) APPROXIMATELY 8" MEASURE 700 LIN FT $40.00 $28,000.00 $45.00 $31,500.00 $50.00 $35,000.00 $46.80 $32,760.00 $45.00 $31,500.0087 2503.603 CURED IN PLACE PIPE (CIPP) APPROXIMATELY 10" MEASURE 420 LIN FT $45.00 $18,900.00 $57.00 $23,940.00$63.00 $26,460.00 $59.28 $24,897.60 $57.00 $23,940.0088 2503.603 8" CIPP PRESSURE RATED LINING (FORCEMAIN) 875 LIN FT $140.00 $122,500.00 $100.00 $87,500.00 $110.00 $96,250.00 $104.00 $91,000.00 $122.00 $106,750.0089 2503.603 CLEANING & TELEVISING (10) 4,100 LIN FT $6.00$24,600.00 $3.00 $12,300.00 $3.00 $12,300.00 $3.90 $15,990.00 $3.00 $12,300.0090 2503.603 INSTALL TRACER WIRE 1,500 LIN FT $6.00 $9,000.00 $4.00 $6,000.00 $8.00 $12,000.00 $9.36 $14,040.00 $17.00 $25,500.0091 2504.601 TEMPORARY WATER SYSTEM 1 LUMP SUM $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $136,000.00 $136,000.00 $74,874.80 $74,874.80 $48,000.00 $48,000.0092 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN 29 EACH $2,500.00 $72,500.00 $5,000.00 $145,000.00 $1,447.00 $41,963.00$3,068.54 $88,987.66 $2,394.00 $69,426.0093 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE 115 EACH $400.00 $46,000.00 $500.00 $57,500.00 $258.00 $29,670.00 $444.39 $51,104.85 $476.00 $54,740.0094 2504.602 HYDRANT 17 EACH $8,000.00 $136,000.00 $6,500.00 $110,500.00 $7,763.00 $131,971.00 $8,725.60 $148,335.20 $7,549.00 $128,333.0095 2504.602 INSTALL HYDRANT 1 EACH $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $3,515.00 $3,515.00 $3,504.80 $3,504.80$2,154.00 $2,154.0096 2504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX 23 EACH $600.00 $13,800.00 $800.00 $18,400.00 $338.00 $7,774.00 $828.98 $19,066.54 $550.00 $12,650.0097 2504.602 1" CORPORATION STOP 115 EACH $600.00 $69,000.00 $600.00 $69,000.00 $422.00 $48,530.00 $1,278.80 $147,062.00 $584.00 $67,160.0098 2504.602 6" GATE VALVE & BOX 24 EACH $2,600.00 $62,400.00 $3,000.00 $72,000.00 $2,998.00 $71,952.00 $3,581.60 $85,958.40 $2,939.00 $70,536.0099 2504.602 8" GATE VALVE & BOX 30 EACH $3,500.00 $105,000.00 $4,000.00 $120,000.00 $3,858.00 $115,740.00 $4,531.12 $135,933.60 $3,918.00 $117,540.00100 2504.602 10" GATE VALVE & BOX 2 EACH $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $6,000.00 $12,000.00 $5,243.00 $10,486.00 $5,812.40 $11,624.80 $5,429.00 $10,858.00101 2504.602 ADJUST CURB STOP & BOX 13 EACH $250.00 $3,250.00 $500.00 $6,500.00 $244.00 $3,172.00 $447.29 $5,814.77 $50.00 $650.00102 2504.602 1" CURB STOP & BOX 115 EACH $450.00 $51,750.00$600.00 $69,000.00 $558.00 $64,170.00 $659.36 $75,826.40$760.00 $87,400.00103 2504.602 CUT IN 6" GV & BOX (11) 3 EACH $5,000.00 $15,000.00 $7,500.00 $22,500.00 $6,644.00 $19,932.00 $6,594.64 $19,783.92 $5,939.00 $17,817.00104 2504.602 REPAIR CURB STOP (UPPER 24") 11 EACH $300.00$3,300.00 $500.00 $5,500.00 $833.00 $9,163.00 $381.68 $4,198.48 $360.00 $3,960.00105 2504.602 REPLACE CURB STOP VALVE BOX - HYDRO EXCAVATION 11 EACH $3,000.00 $33,000.00 $2,000.00 $22,000.00 $1,624.00 $17,864.00 $2,600.00 $28,600.00 $691.00 $7,601.00106 2504.602 VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENT 13 EACH $3,250.00 $42,250.00 $1,000.00 $13,000.00 $3,889.00 $50,557.00 $3,454.16 $44,904.08 $4,211.00 $54,743.00107 2504.602 MISCELLANEOUS WATERMAIN FITTING BOLT REPLACEMENT 3 EACH $1,500.00 $4,500.00 $2,500.00 $7,500.00 $3,245.00 $9,735.00 $1,040.00 $3,120.00 $3,920.00 $11,760.00108 2504.602 CASTING ASSEMBLY (A-1) 18 EACH $500.00 $9,000.00 $800.00 $14,400.00 $341.00 $6,138.00 $277.80 $5,000.40 $250.00 $4,500.00109 2504.602 TRACER WIRE ACCESS BOX 115 EACH $175.00 $20,125.00 $250.00 $28,750.00 $368.00 $42,320.00 $195.52 $22,484.80 $109.00 $12,535.00110 2504.602 LINING ACCESS PIT (12) 11 EACH $12,000.00 $132,000.00 $2,850.00 $31,350.00 $4,530.00 $49,830.00 $1,040.00 $11,440.00 $5,000.00 $55,000.00111 2504.602 ROBOTIC WATER SERVICE REINSTATEMENTS (13) 35EACH $800.00 $28,000.00 $300.00 $10,500.00 $332.00 $11,620.00 $312.00 $10,920.00 $300.00 $10,500.00112 2504.603 1" TYPE PE PIPE 3,550 LIN FT $30.00 $106,500.00 $35.00 $124,250.00 $29.00 $102,950.00 $28.60 $101,530.00 $47.00 $166,850.00113 2504.603 6" PVC WATERMAIN C900 DR 18 200 LIN FT $65.00 $13,000.00 $58.00 $11,600.00 $84.00 $16,800.00 $68.43 $13,686.00 $61.00 $12,200.00114 2504.603 8" PVC WATERMAIN C900 DR 18 6,305 LIN FT $60.00 $378,300.00 $60.00 $378,300.00 $60.00 $378,300.00 $72.30 $455,851.50 $59.00 $371,995.00115 2504.603 10" PVC WATERMAIN C900 DR 18 40 LIN FT $100.00 $4,000.00 $80.00 $3,200.00 $100.00 $4,000.00 $90.48 $3,619.20 $97.00 $3,880.00116 2504.603 8" CIPP PRESSURE RATED LINING (WATERMAIN) 2,105 LIN FT $140.00 $294,700.00 $125.00 $263,125.00 $133.00 $279,965.00 $130.00 $273,650.00 $120.00 $252,600.00117 2504.604 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION 40 SQ YD $65.00 $2,600.00 $50.00 $2,000.00 $58.00 $2,320.00 $70.72 $2,828.80 $72.00 $2,880.00 188 ABSTRACT OF BIDS* bid amount changed due to found calculation/addition error * bid amount changed due to found calculation/addition error2025 City Pavement RehabilitationCITY PROJECT NO. 25-01City of Chanhassen, MNBMI PROJECT NO. 24X.135637.000BID DATE:4/11/2025TIME:10:00 AM1234ITEM MNDOT APPROX.NO.SPEC NO.ITEMNOTESQUANT.UNITUNIT PRICEAMOUNTUNIT PRICEAMOUNTUNIT PRICEAMOUNTUNIT PRICEAMOUNTUNIT PRICEAMOUNTBolton & Menk, Inc.Ryan Contracting Co.S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc.Valley Paving, Inc.Northwest Asphalt, Inc.Engineer's Estimate118 2504.608 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS 5,418 POUND $10.00 $54,180.00 $15.00 $81,270.00 $21.80 $118,112.40 $15.08 $81,703.44 $18.00 $97,524.00119 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM) 98 EACH $1,250.00 $122,500.00 $1,000.00 $98,000.00 $1,021.00 $100,058.00 $837.10 $82,035.80 $1,070.00 $104,860.00120 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY (SANITARY) 3 EACH $1,250.00 $3,750.00 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 $808.00 $2,424.00 $975.92$2,927.76 $1,570.00 $4,710.00121 2506.502 CHANHASSEN 26" LID 90 EACH $300.00 $27,000.00 $1,000.00 $90,000.00 $395.00 $35,550.00 $361.63 $32,546.70 $357.50 $32,175.00122 2506.502 INSTALL CASTING 1 EACH $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $808.00 $808.00 $469.10 $469.10 $990.00$990.00123 2506.502 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING (STORM) 10 EACH$1,250.00 $12,500.00 $1,000.00 $10,000.00 $392.00 $3,920.00 $458.80 $4,588.00 $1,331.00 $13,310.00124 2506.502 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING (SANITARY) 64EACH $1,250.00 $80,000.00 $1,000.00 $64,000.00 $393.00 $25,152.00 $682.45 $43,676.80 $1,331.00 $85,184.00125 2506.502 SUMP MANHOLE BAFFLE 6 EACH $5,000.00 $30,000.00 $8,000.00 $48,000.00 $5,405.00 $32,430.00 $6,146.12 $36,876.72 $7,400.00 $44,400.00126 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020 56 LIN FT $440.00 $24,640.00 $400.00 $22,400.00 $515.00$28,840.00 $691.24 $38,709.44 $564.00 $31,584.00127 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 60-4020 19 LIN FT $800.00 $14,960.00 $800.00 $14,960.00 $789.00$14,754.30 $960.21 $17,955.93 $516.00 $9,649.20128 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 72-4020 37 LIN FT $1,000.00 $36,700.00 $1,100.00 $40,370.00 $1,075.00 $39,452.50 $1,621.84 $59,521.53 $1,217.00 $44,663.90129 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 108-4020 8 LIN FT $2,500.00 $20,000.00 $1,500.00 $12,000.00 $2,731.00 $21,848.00 $3,779.54 $30,236.32 $2,485.00 $19,880.00130 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 1 - 2'X3' (3101) 4 LIN FT $600.00 $2,280.00 $400.00 $1,520.00 $542.00 $2,059.60 $547.07 $2,078.87 $867.00 $3,294.60131 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 2 - 48-4022 (3102) 306 LIN FT $375.00 $114,637.50 $400.00 $122,280.00 $561.00 $171,497.70 $748.01 $228,666.66$615.00 $188,005.50132 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 3 - 60-4022 (3102) 40 LIN FT $900.00 $35,640.00 $800.00 $31,680.00 $769.00 $30,452.40 $1,006.31 $39,849.88 $811.00 $32,115.60133 2506.503CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 4 - 72-4022 SUMP MH (3110)56 LIN FT $1,250.00 $69,875.00 $800.00 $44,720.00 $867.00$48,465.30 $1,238.34 $69,223.21 $925.00 $51,707.50134 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 5 - OCS 1 EACH $18,000.00 $18,000.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $6,422.00 $6,422.00 $10,262.59 $10,262.59 $6,757.00 $6,757.00135 2506.503 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE (SAN) 27 LIN FT $525.00 $14,385.00 $400.00 $10,960.00 $470.00 $12,878.00 $966.02 $26,468.95 $384.00 $10,521.60136 2506.601 INSTALL GENERATOR AND ATS 1 LUMP SUM $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $110,000.00 $110,000.00 $75,400.00 $75,400.00 $85,000.00 $85,000.00137 2506.602 RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE - PARTIAL 3 EACH $750.00 $2,250.00 $2,000.00 $6,000.00 $2,300.00 $6,900.00 $2,427.84 $7,283.52 $3,150.00 $9,450.00138 2506.602 EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL (SAN) 67 EACH $250.00$16,750.00 $350.00 $23,450.00 $383.00 $25,661.00 $303.98$20,366.66 $190.00 $12,730.00139 2506.602 SUMP SERVICE CONNECTION BOX 61 EACH $400.00 $24,400.00 $350.00 $21,350.00 $1,325.00 $80,825.00 $446.28 $27,223.08 $366.00 $22,326.00140 2506.602 FLARED END MAINTENANCE 1 EACH $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $410.00 $410.00 $1,105.79 $1,105.79 $850.00 $850.00141 2506.602 6" PVC DRAINTILE CLEANOUT 6 EACH $500.00 $3,000.00 $500.00 $3,000.00 $436.00 $2,616.00 $723.72 $4,342.32 $354.00 $2,124.00142 2506.602 RAIN GARDEN PLANTING SYSTEM 3 EACH $2,500.00 $7,500.00 $5,000.00 $15,000.00 $11,084.00 $33,252.00 $1,705.60 $5,116.80 $2,500.00 $7,500.00143 2506.602 RAIN GARDEN SITE GRADING 3 EACH $3,000.00 $9,000.00 $5,000.00 $15,000.00 $3,325.00 $9,975.00 $2,670.32 $8,010.96 $2,500.00 $7,500.00144 2506.603 6" PVC DRAINTILE 120 LIN FT $80.00 $9,600.00$40.00 $4,800.00 $29.00 $3,480.00 $16.47 $1,976.40 $38.00$4,560.00145 2506.618 RAIN GARDEN FILTER MEDIA MIX 90 CU YD $120.00 $10,800.00 $100.00 $9,000.00 $72.00 $6,480.00 $68.06 $6,125.40 $55.00 $4,950.00146 2506.618 INFILTRATION MEDIA MIX 280 CU YD $120.00 $33,600.00 $80.00 $22,400.00 $72.00 $20,160.00 $66.42 $18,597.60 $55.70 $15,596.00147 2506.618 RAIN GARDEN SPLASH BLOCKS 60 SQ FT $80.00 $4,800.00 $80.00 $4,800.00 $110.00 $6,600.00 $59.63 $3,577.80$67.22 $4,033.20148 2511.507 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III 243 CU YD $140.00 $34,020.00 $80.00 $19,440.00 $156.00 $37,908.00 $154.21 $37,473.03 $120.00 $29,160.00149 2521.518 6" CONCRETE WALK/DRIVEWAY (7) 10,440 SQ FT $10.00 $104,400.00 $9.00 $93,960.00 $12.50 $130,500.00 $9.95$103,878.00 $8.84 $92,289.60150 2521.518 8" CONCRETE GENERATOR PAD (7) 100 SQ FT $50.00 $5,000.00 $12.00 $1,200.00 $15.00 $1,500.00 $23.89 $2,389.00 $20.34 $2,034.00151 2521.518 4" BITUMINOUS WALK/DRIVEWAY (7) 25,395 SQ FT $3.50 $88,882.50 $5.00 $126,975.00 $4.90 $124,435.50 $5.78$146,783.10 $18.97 $481,743.15152 2521.602 DRILL & GROUT REINF BAR (EPOXY COATED) 685 EACH $15.00 $10,275.00 $15.00 $10,275.00 $16.00 $10,960.00 $5.25 $3,596.25 $5.00 $3,425.00153 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 12,000 LIN FT $18.00 $216,000.00 $22.00 $264,000.00 $23.30 $279,600.00 $19.57 $234,840.00 $18.63 $223,560.00154 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 OR SURMOUNTABLE (HANDFORMED) 4,360 LIN FT $32.50 $141,700.00 $35.00 $152,600.00 $38.00 $165,680.00 $33.62 $146,583.20 $32.00 $139,520.00155 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES 138 SQ FT $80.00 $11,040.00 $75.00 $10,350.00 $63.00 $8,694.00 $52.53 $7,249.14 $50.00 $6,900.00156 2540.601 TEMPORARY MAIL BOX 1 LUMP SUM $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $8,300.00 $8,300.00 $0.01 $0.01 $8,625.00 $8,625.00157 2540.602 INSTALL MAIL BOX 115 EACH $100.00 $11,500.00 $300.00 $34,500.00 $166.00 $19,090.00 $78.00 $8,970.00 $75.00 $8,625.00158 2540.602 INSTALL PILLAR 1 EACH $300.00 $300.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $554.00 $554.00 $658.16 $658.16 $500.00 $500.00159 2540.618 INSTALL BRICK PAVERS 945 SQ FT $20.00 $18,900.00 $25.00 $23,625.00 $7.00 $6,615.00 $7.01 $6,624.45 $25.00 $23,625.00160 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LUMP SUM $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $11,336.00 $11,336.00 $5,900.00 $5,900.00161 2564.502 INSTALL SIGN 2 EACH $250.00 $500.00 $300.00 $600.00 $1,663.00 $3,326.00 $260.00 $520.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00162 2564.502 OBJECT MARKER 21 EACH $150.00 $3,150.00 $250.00 $5,250.00 $94.00 $1,974.00 $156.00 $3,276.00 $85.00 $1,785.00163 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C 439 SQ FT $75.00 $32,925.00 $60.00 $26,340.00 $69.00 $30,291.00 $67.60 $29,676.40 $62.50 $27,437.50164 2573.501 EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR 1 LUMP SUM $10,000.00$10,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $6,363.60 $6,363.60 $500.00 $500.00165 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION 42 EACH $300.00 $12,600.00 $150.00 $6,300.00 $133.00 $5,586.00 $432.45 $18,162.90 $500.00 $21,000.00166 2573.503 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS 4,720 LIN FT $2.00 $9,440.00 $2.00 $9,440.00 $2.20 $10,384.00 $1.80 $8,496.00 $2.50 $11,800.00167 2573.503 FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN TYPE STILL WATER 260LIN FT $25.00 $6,500.00 $20.00 $5,200.00 $28.00 $7,280.00$15.76 $4,097.60 $17.25 $4,485.00168 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER 6,300 LIN FT $2.50 $15,750.00 $3.00 $18,900.00 $3.50 $22,050.00 $2.82 $17,766.00 $2.50 $15,750.00169 2573.602 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT 12 EACH $1,500.00 $18,000.00 $500.00 $6,000.00 $1,110.00 $13,320.00 $1,583.70 $19,004.40 $1,800.00 $21,600.00170 2574.507 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW 1,761 CU YD $34.00 $59,874.00 $40.00 $70,440.00 $33.50 $58,993.50 $59.65 $105,043.65 $56.16 $98,897.76171 2575.504 SODDING TYPE LAWN (15) 7,560 SQ YD $10.00 $75,600.00 $10.00 $75,600.00 $10.00 $75,600.00 $10.72 $81,043.20 $9.95 $75,222.00172 2574.505 SUBSOILING 8 ACRE $600.00 $4,872.00 $600.00 $4,872.00 $333.00 $2,703.96 $312.00 $2,533.44 $750.00 $6,090.00173 2575.523 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 3 20 MGAL $750.00 $15,000.00 $800.00 $16,000.00 $665.00 $13,300.00 $640.81 $12,816.20 $785.00 $15,700.00174 2574.604ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 20 W/ SEED MIX RESIDENTIAL TURFGRASS8,500 SQ YD $5.00 $42,500.00 $5.00 $42,500.00 $2.20 $18,700.00 $1.80 $15,300.00 $4.65 $39,525.00175 2575.604HYDROMULCH TYPE FIBER BONDED MATRIX W/ SEED MIX RESIDENTIAL TURFGRASS21,730 SQ YD $4.50 $97,785.00 $4.65 $101,044.50 $2.20 $47,806.00 $1.38 $29,987.40 $3.95 $85,833.50176 2575.604 TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT 140 SQ YD $25.00 $3,500.00 $13.00 $1,820.00 $7.00 $980.00 $16.91 $2,367.40 $12.30$1,722.00189 ABSTRACT OF BIDS* bid amount changed due to found calculation/addition error * bid amount changed due to found calculation/addition error2025 City Pavement RehabilitationCITY PROJECT NO. 25-01City of Chanhassen, MNBMI PROJECT NO. 24X.135637.000BID DATE:4/11/2025TIME:10:00 AM1234ITEM MNDOT APPROX.NO.SPEC NO.ITEMNOTESQUANT.UNITUNIT PRICEAMOUNTUNIT PRICEAMOUNTUNIT PRICEAMOUNTUNIT PRICEAMOUNTUNIT PRICEAMOUNTBolton & Menk, Inc.Ryan Contracting Co.S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc.Valley Paving, Inc.Northwest Asphalt, Inc.Engineer's Estimate177 2582.503 24" SOLID LINE MULTI COMP GR IN 300 LIN FT $20.00 $6,000.00 $16.00 $4,800.00 $18.00 $5,400.00 $16.64 $4,992.00 $16.00 $4,800.00178 2582.518 CROSSWALK MULTI COMP GR IN 105 SQ FT $13.00 $1,365.00 $11.00 $1,155.00 $12.00 $1,260.00 $11.44 $1,201.20$11.00 $1,155.00179 LANDSCAPING ALLOWANCE (14) 1 ALLOWANCE $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00$150,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00180 IRRIGATION SYSTEM & ELECTRIC FENCE REPAIR ALLOWANCE (14) 1 ALLOWANCE $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00$150,000.00 $150,000.00BASE BID TOTAL BID: $8,714,999.50 $8,929,189.50 $8,947,085.16 $9,163,896.18 $9,184,105.43NOTES:(P) PLAN QUANTITY(1) ANY SIZE, TYPE, OR THICKNESS(2) NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE MADE FOR VARIATIONS ENCOUNTERED(3) WITH WATER, PICKUP BROOM, AND VACUUM(4) FOR REPLACEMENT OF BROKEN SECTIONS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER(5) TO BE USED AT ENGINEERS DISCRETION AND AS NEEDED(6) TO BE USED ON FITTINGS AS ENCOUNTERED DURING GATE VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENT(7) INCLUDES 6" AGGREGATE BASE CL. 5(8) SHALL CONFORM TO CITY STANDARD DETAIL 5302-A(9) FOR PIPE STRUCUTRAL BEDDING AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER(10) FOR CIPP PIPE ONLY(11) INCLUDES REMOVAL OF ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS AND ALL WORK NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE GATE VALVE INSTALLATION(12) INCLUDES ALL SHORING REQUIRED(13) ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL NOT BE MADE FOR SERVICES MISSED BY ROBOTIC REINSTATEMENT(14) REPAIRS TO IRRIGATION OR DOG FENCE WILL ONLY BE PAID ONCE PER ADDRESS REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF REPAIRS REQUIRED(15) SHALL ONLY BE USED ON PROPERTIES WITH AN EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM(16) FOR PONDS ONLY 190 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item Resolution 2025-XX; Revisions to Assessment Policy File No.N/A Item No: D.12 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution accepting revisions to the City's Assessment Policy." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Financial Sustainability SUMMARY This item is to consider adoption of proposed changes to the City's Assessment Policy. The proposed changes and a clean version are attached to this staff report. BACKGROUND Chanhassen has had an Assessment Policy since 1993. Updates have been made over time with the last update in January 2022. The City Council reviewed suggested revisions to the policy at their 02/10/2025, 03/24/2025, and 04/14/2025 work sessions. Copies of those presentations are attached to this staff report. The suggested changes that were reviewed included the following general items: 1. Minor language updates to provide clarity, additional context, and details 2. Ways to help the cost burden of property owners, including: 191 a. Interest Rate b. Term c. Consideration of a Flat Rate methodology DISCUSSION The City Council supported including a Flat Rate assessment methodology for the various rehabilitation project types beginning with the 2025 Street Improvement Project. Not all projects would utilize the Flat Rate methodology, but the intent is that the vast majority will. The benefits of the Flat Rate methodology include: Creates a known amount that can be communicated and planned for Ease of administering It's fair, equitable, and repeatable Ease of understanding and communicating Accomplishes the 10-yr CIP without additional funding The rates fall within the probable special benefit The inclusion of a Flat Rate methodology requires an update to the adopted Fee Schedule, which is scheduled for the May 12, 2025 City Council meeting. The initial assessments amounts are proposed to be: $2,850/unit for Mill and Overlay $5,000/unit for Full Depth Reclamation $9,270/unit for Reconstruction BUDGET N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Assessment Policy changes. ATTACHMENTS Resolution - Adopt Assessment Policy Changes 2025 Assessment Policy 2025 Update-Tracked Changes Assessment Policy 2025 Update-Clean CURRENT Assessment Policy and FAQ Presentation-20250210 Assessment Policy Updates Presentation-20250324 Assessment Policy Updates Presentation-20250414 Assessment Policy Updates 192 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: May 5 , 2025 RESOLUTION NO:2025-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ADOPTING REVISIONS TO THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY WHEREAS,Minnesota Statute §429 gives authority to cities to levy assessments on private property that receive benefit from public improvement projects; and WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen has had a Special Assessment Policy since 1993; and WHEREAS, the City Council sees a need to update the policy for various reasons, including additional language to provide clarity and to implement strategies to assist with the cost burden on property owners receiving the assessment; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute §435.193 allows a statutory city to establish standards and guidelines to defer special assessments; and WHEREAS, the City Council on July 9, 2007, adopted Resolution No. 2007-42 A Resolution Establishing a Hardship Assessment Deferral for Senior Citizens or Retired and Disabled Persons; and WHEREAS, the City Council would like to rescind Resolution No. 2007-42 and incorporate the standards and guidelines to defer special assessments into the special assessment policy. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, does hereby adopt the attached revised assessment policy. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 5 th day of May 2025. ATTEST: Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 193 Page 1 of 5 CITY OF CHANHASSEN ASSESSMENT POLICY Date of Last City Council Adoption: update May 5, 2025d January 2022 The City of Chanhassen’s Assessment Policy is intended to provide general direction to City Staff and their consultants in preparation of assessment rolls to establishnsure fair and consistent treatment of all properties within the City that are subject to an assessment. This document canwill also be used to educate and explain to property owners about the Policy. All assessments shall follow the process outlined in Minnesota State Statutes, Chapter 429, which gives the City the legal authority to assess benefiting property for public improvements.. The strict interpretation of thisis Policy may not apply in all circumstances,circumstances, it is intended to be a guide for a systematic process. at which time Tthe City Council may direct staff to use special consideration and discretion for thedetermine an alternate assessment methodology on projects. WHICH PROPERTIES ARE TO BE ASSESED Determination about which properties are to be included in the assessment role generally fall into two (2) property types: 1. Type 1: Land use that generates a low level of vehicular traffic, such as low density All benefiting presidential properties. o These properties shall be included in the assessment role for public street improvements that currently have their primary driveway access, or that it can be reasonably determined maywill have a future driveway access, to the street being rehabilitated, to the public street being reconstructed or rehabilitated shall be included in the assessment roll. This includes property with a shared driveway or private street access to the public street, except where said private street meets applicable criteria to allow for a reduced or no assessment. The policy acknowledges that private streets are not maintained by the City and therefore all costs associated with the maintenance of them are borne by the property legally required to maintain them. Applicable criteria of private streets includes whether the private street meets City Code requirements with respect tohas standard street width, pavement section, and appropriate fire apparatus turn-around. 2. Other land use property types that generate increased levels of vehicular traffic, such as commercial, multi- family, or schools. o These properties shall be included in the assessment role for all adjacent public street improvement projects, regardless of which street their primary driveway takes access from, or the number of driveway access points; unless it can be reasonably determined that the use of the property does not have any traffic impact on the adjacent public street receiving the improvements. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY There are various ways to calculate assessments., The typically methodology isdone based on the number of parcels, an area, or linear foot calculation. Chanhassen has also developed a policy that utilizes a flat rate, meaning all parcels to be assessed receive the same assessment regardless of any particular property characteristic.  For property type 1 listed above, the properties to be assessed will receive an assessment amount equal to the flat rate for which rehabilitation type the project is utilizing (mill and overlay, full depth reclamation, or reconstruction). The flat rate is established on the City’s Fee Schedule, which is updated and approved by the City Council annually. The flat rate utilized for a project will be the rate that is in effect on the date the assessment role is adopted.  For property type 2 listed above, tThe City shall use the calculation method that creates a reasonable distribution of assessments across the entire roll. 194 Page 2 of 5  Where reasonable to do so, wWhen more than one “neighborhood” is contained within the same project, the assessment roll mayshall be calculated per each neighborhood, rather than the total project. This would not apply to property type 1 as they would all receive a flat rate assessment.  Unless otherwise exempt, pPublic property, government land, private associations, schools, churches, and non-profit property usess shawill be included in the assessment rollcalculations.  Commercial property, and Medium, and High- Density Residential property shall be assessed based on a reasonable determination of vehicular traffic generated.  A duplex that is located on a single parcel, shall be considered two units. Generally, when traffic volumes are used as the assessment methodology, a Residential Equivalent Unit (REU) or similar other unit assessment relationship shall be used. NEW CONSTRUCTION: 100% assessed to all benefitting properties. New construction is typically paid for by the development itself and therefore not formally assessed. In some instances, the City will undertake proactive installation of public utilities to unserved areas and then assess the benefiting properties, or establish an improvement district/area with deferred access charges to cover the cost for the added service. In other instances, properties may petition the City directly for the installation of the public improvements in which case 100% of the costs are paid for by the benefiting properties. Assessable Costs Include:  Construction of a new public street, trail and/or sidewalk.  Installation of public water main, storm sewer and/or sanitary sewer system, including appurtenances (structures, valves, hydrants, lift stations, etc.), where it did not previously exist.  Indirect costs (design, legal, and administration fees). Notes:  Oversizing of streets and utilities beyond the city’s standard details, or what is needed for the development itself,, are paid for by the cCity and are typically not assessed. RECONSTRUCTION/REHABILITATION: 40% assessed to all benefitting properties, unless a flat rate methodology is utilized. When determining the rehabilitation method to be used, the following decision matrix shall be used for planning purposes: Question If Yes If No Does the street need to change its intended use; change to meet our current standard (width, thickness, C&G, drainage, etc.); and/or has it met its useful service life (~50 yrs)? Plan for Reconstruction Move to next question Is the pavement condition OCI between 0 and 29? Plan for Reconstruction Move to next question Is the pavement condition OCI between 30 and 59? Plan for FDR Move to next question Is the pavement condition OCI greater than 60? Plan for M&O n/a Notes:  Once a project is under design, an engineering analysis will be undertaken to determine the appropriate rehabilitation method.  Two inches (2”) shall be the standard depth for a mill and overlay unless particular circumstances exist. Under such circumstances, the flat rate will not be adjusted. 195 Page 3 of 5 Assessable Costs Include:  Pavement associated with public streets, trails and/or sidewalks. This includes draintile, geotechnical (soil corrections, etc.), and other improvements needed to support the function of the pavement structure. o In situations where there is no existing trail or sidewalk infrastructure, but such improvements are being added by the project, the costs associated with the addition shall not be assessed unless particular circumstances exist such as when the benefit of the new infrastructure is of primary benefit to the assessable properties only.  Curb and gutter, including curb impacted solely by utility improvements.  Driveway pavement and aprons directly affected by the project work.  Storm Sewer and appurtenances associated with street drainage.  Multi-Modal improvements such as ADA ramps and actuated pedestrian crossings such as Rectangular Rapid- Flashing Beacons (RRFB’s).  Signing and stripping.  Retaining walls required within the Right-of-Way.  Tree removal and/or landscaping improvements directly affected by the project work.  Applicable percentage of indirect costs (design, legal, and admin fees). Notes:  Rehabilitation is typically defined as mill and overlay and/or full depth reclamation activities.  If a residential property has accessbenefits from a collector or otherwise oversized street, the assessment amount shall be based on an equitable formula compared to a typical local roadway, including normalizing to a city standard31-foot widthide street, typical street pavement section, typical lot width, and other applicable factors. This normalization does not apply to a flat rate assessment.  Pavement projects on streets that provide direct access to Chanhassen property(s) that are being implemented by an adjacent municipality shall not be assessed to the Chanhassen property(s) unless the adjacent municipality is assessing the benefitting property in their jurisdiction as part of the project.  Replacement, maintenance, or repair of existing public water main, storm sewer and/or sanitary sewer, and indirect stormwater management infrastructure shall not be assessed. The City will pay 100% of these improvement costs out of the associated enterprise fund. REGULAR MAINTENANCE: Benefiting properties are not assessed.  Activities Include: Pavement patching, pothole filling, crack sealing, chip sealing, sealcoating, sign maintenance, lighting, and pavement markingsre-stripping. ASSESSMENT PAYMENT OPTIONS  Assessments can be paid in full up- front with no finance charge, otherwiser the assessment will be certified to the County and added to annual property taxes with interest.  If elected to be added to annual property taxes, the balance can be paid off at any time during the term if later requested by the property owner.  Interest will be charged to property owners who choose to not pay their assessments in full by November 15th in the year the special assessment is levied. The interest rate will be equal to the yield on the 7-year Treasury Note on the date the special assessment roll is adopted, plus 1.0%. The interest rate will be equal to the average interest cost of the City’s most recent bond issue plus 2%. If the City has not issued bonds in the past 196 Page 4 of 5 year, the City will use the current municipal bond index rate for AAA rated issuers at the time the special assessment is approved.  Unless approved otherwise by the City Council, the maximum financing term for assessments shall be as follows: o $0-$500 1 year o $501-$2,500 5 years o $2,501-$5,000 8 years o $5,001-$15,000 and above 10 years o $15,001 and above 15 years HARDSHIP ASSESSMENT DEFERAL FOR SENIORS, DISABLED, OR MILITARY PERSONS Minnesota Statute §435.193 allows a statutory city to establish standards and guidelines to defer special assessments. A deferment of a special assessment for a homesteaded property may be granted if: (1) The property is owned by a person 65 years of age or older or reƟred by virtue of a permanent and total disability* for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments; or (2) The property is owned by a person who is a member of the Minnesota NaƟonal Guard or other military reserves who is ordered into acƟve military service, as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 190.05, subdivision 5b or 5c, as stated in the person’s military orders, for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. The deferment is not an eliminaƟon of the assessment, but rather a temporary pause of paying the assessment unƟl the hardship no longer exists. Interest on deferred assessments shall be subject to and charged at the interest rate set by the City Council on its resoluƟon adopƟng the special assessment, and such interest shall accrue on said principal unƟl the special assessment is paid in full. The opƟon of the property owner to defer the payment of special assessments shall terminate and all amounts accumulated plus accrued interest (compounded annually) shall become due and payable within sixty (60) days upon the occurrence of any of the following events: (1) The sale, transfer, or subdivision of the property or any part thereof, or the property is in any way conveyed to another person; or (2) The subject property loses its homestead status for any reason; or (3) The death of the owner qualified for deferral status unless a surviving spouse is eligible for benefits hereunder; or (4) If for any reason the City Council determines that there would be no hardship in requiring an immediate or parƟal payment of the deferred special assessment. To request deferral of a special assessment, the property owner must request a deferment on the form prescribed by the City Clerk within thirty (30) days aŌer the adopƟon of the improvement assessment by the City Council. The applicant must submit a copy of the federal income tax return from the year prior to the assessment to verify that all sources of income do not exceed the very low-income limits for the Carver County area as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The property must be the applicant’s principal residence and classified on the real estate tax rolls as the applicant’s homestead. City staff will review the applicaƟon and if the applicant meets the standards and guidelines above, the deferment will be granted. The City Council has the discreƟon to make the determinaƟon that a hardship exists based on excepƟonal and unusual circumstances not covered by the standards and guidelines where the determinaƟon is made in a 197 Page 5 of 5 nondiscriminatory manner and does not give the applicant an unreasonable preference or advantage over other applicants. *Permanent and total disability shall have the same definiƟon for purposes of assessment deferral as is used for social security. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AThe City has developed a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document addressing the most common questions concerning assessments. The FAQ document is attached to this policy and can also be found on the City’s websitee.. 198 Page 1 of 5 CITY OF CHANHASSEN ASSESSMENT POLICY Date of Last City Council Adoption: May 5, 2025 The City of Chanhassen’s Assessment Policy is intended to provide general direction to City Staff and their consultants in preparation of assessment rolls to establish fair and consistent treatment of all properties within the City that are subject to an assessment. This document can also be used to educate and explain to property owners about the Policy. All assessments shall follow the process outlined in Minnesota State Statutes, Chapter 429, which gives the City the legal authority to assess benefiting property for public improvements. The strict interpretation of this Policy may not apply in all circumstances, it is intended to be a guide for a systematic process. The City Council may direct staff to use special consideration and discretion for the assessment methodology on projects. WHICH PROPERTIES ARE TO BE ASSESED Determination about which properties are to be included in the assessment role generally fall into two (2) property types: 1. Type 1: Land use that generates a low level of vehicular traffic, such as low-density residential properties. o These properties shall be included in the assessment role for public street improvements that have their primary driveway access, or that it can be reasonably determined will have a future driveway access, to the street being rehabilitated. This includes property with a shared driveway or private street access to the public street, except where said private street meets applicable criteria to allow for a reduced or no assessment. The policy acknowledges that private streets are not maintained by the City and therefore all costs associated with the maintenance of them are borne by the property legally required to maintain them. Applicable criteria of private streets includes whether the street meets City Code requirements with respect to width, pavement section, and appropriate fire apparatus turn-around. 2. Other land use property types that generate increased levels of vehicular traffic, such as commercial, multi- family, or schools. o These properties shall be included in the assessment role for all adjacent public street improvement projects, regardless of which street their primary driveway takes access from, or the number of driveway access points; unless it can be reasonably determined that the use of the property does not have any traffic impact on the adjacent public street receiving the improvements. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY There are various ways to calculate assessments. The typical methodology is based on the number of parcels, an area, or linear foot calculation. Chanhassen has also developed a policy that utilizes a flat rate, meaning all parcels to be assessed receive the same assessment regardless of any particular property characteristic. • For property type 1 listed above, the properties to be assessed will receive an assessment amount equal to the flat rate for which rehabilitation type the project is utilizing (mill and overlay, full depth reclamation, or reconstruction). The flat rate is established on the City’s Fee Schedule, which is updated and approved by the City Council annually. The flat rate utilized for a project will be the rate that is in effect on the date the assessment role is adopted. • For property type 2 listed above, the City shall use the calculation method that creates a reasonable distribution of assessments across the entire roll. 199 Page 2 of 5 • Where reasonable to do so, when more than one “neighborhood” is contained within the same project, the assessment roll may be calculated per each neighborhood, rather than the total project. This would not apply to property type 1 as they would all receive a flat rate assessment. • Unless otherwise exempt, public property, government land, private associations, schools, churches, and non-profit property uses shall be included in the assessment roll. • Commercial property, and Medium and High-Density Residential property shall be assessed based on a reasonable determination of vehicular traffic generated. • A duplex that is located on a single parcel, shall be considered two units. Generally, when traffic volumes are used as the assessment methodology, a Residential Equivalent Unit (REU) or similar other unit assessment relationship shall be used. NEW CONSTRUCTION: 100% assessed to all benefitting properties. New construction is typically paid for by the development itself and therefore not formally assessed. In some instances, the City will undertake proactive installation of public utilities to unserved areas and then assess the benefiting properties, or establish an improvement district/area with deferred access charges to cover the cost for the added service. In other instances, properties may petition the City directly for the installation of the public improvements in which case 100% of the costs are paid for by the benefiting properties. Assessable Costs Include: • Construction of a new public street, trail and/or sidewalk. • Installation of public water main, storm sewer and/or sanitary sewer system, including appurtenances (structures, valves, hydrants, lift stations, etc.), where it did not previously exist. • Indirect costs (design, legal, and administration fees). Notes: • Oversizing of streets and utilities beyond the city’s standard details, or what is needed for the development itself, are paid for by the city and are typically not assessed. RECONSTRUCTION/REHABILITATION: 40% assessed to all benefitting properties, unless a flat rate methodology is utilized. When determining the rehabilitation method to be used, the following decision matrix shall be used for planning purposes: Question If Yes If No Does the street need to change its intended use; change to meet our current standard (width, thickness, C&G, drainage, etc.); and/or has it met its useful service life (~50 yrs)? Plan for Reconstruction Move to next question Is the pavement condition OCI between 0 and 29? Plan for Reconstruction Move to next question Is the pavement condition OCI between 30 and 59? Plan for FDR Move to next question Is the pavement condition OCI greater than 60? Plan for M&O n/a Notes: • Once a project is under design, an engineering analysis will be undertaken to determine the appropriate rehabilitation method. 200 Page 3 of 5 • Two inches (2”) shall be the standard depth for a mill and overlay unless particular circumstances exist. Under such circumstances, the flat rate will not be adjusted. Assessable Costs Include: • Pavement associated with public streets, trails and/or sidewalks. This includes draintile, geotechnical (soil corrections, etc.), and other improvements needed to support the function of the pavement structure. o In situations where there is no existing trail or sidewalk infrastructure, but such improvements are being added by the project, the costs associated with the addition shall not be assessed unless particular circumstances exist such as when the benefit of the new infrastructure is of primary benefit to the assessable properties only. • Curb and gutter, including curb impacted solely by utility improvements. • Driveway pavement and aprons directly affected by the project work. • Storm Sewer and appurtenances associated with street drainage. • Multi-Modal improvements such as ADA ramps and actuated pedestrian crossings such as Rectangular Rapid- Flashing Beacons (RRFB’s). • Signing and striping. • Retaining walls required within the Right-of-Way. • Tree removal and/or landscaping improvements directly affected by the project work. • Applicable percentage of indirect costs (design, legal, and admin fees). Notes: • If a residential property has access from a collector or otherwise oversized street, the assessment amount shall be based on an equitable formula compared to a typical local roadway, including normalizing to a city standard width, typical street pavement section, typical lot width, and other applicable factors. This normalization does not apply to a flat rate assessment. • Pavement projects on streets that provide direct access to Chanhassen property(s) that are being implemented by an adjacent municipality shall not be assessed to the Chanhassen property(s) unless the adjacent municipality is assessing the benefiting property in their jurisdiction as part of the project. • Replacement, maintenance, or repair of existing public water main, sanitary sewer, and indirect stormwater management infrastructure shall not be assessed. The City will pay 100% of these improvement costs out of the associated enterprise fund. REGULAR MAINTENANCE: Benefiting properties are not assessed. • Activities Include: Pavement patching, pothole filling, crack sealing, chip sealing, sealcoating, sign maintenance, lighting, and pavement markings. PAYMENT OPTIONS • Assessments can be paid in full up-front with no finance charge, otherwise the assessment will be certified to the County and added to annual property taxes with interest. • If elected to add to annual property taxes, the balance can be paid off at any time during the term if requested by the property owner. • Interest will be charged to property owners who choose to not pay their assessments in full by November 15th in the year the special assessment is levied. The interest rate will be equal to the yield on the 7-year Treasury Note on the date the special assessment roll is adopted, plus 1.0%. 201 Page 4 of 5 • Unless approved otherwise by the City Council, the maximum financing term for assessments shall be as follows: o $0-$500 1 year o $501-$2,500 5 years o $2,501-$5,000 8 years o $5,001-$15,000 10 years o $15,001 and above 15 years HARDSHIP ASSESSMENT DEFERAL FOR SENIORS, DISABLED, OR MILITARY PERSONS Minnesota Statute §435.193 allows a statutory city to establish standards and guidelines to defer special assessments. A deferment of a special assessment for a homesteaded property may be granted if: (1) The property is owned by a person 65 years of age or older or retired by virtue of a permanent and total disability* for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments; or (2) The property is owned by a person who is a member of the Minnesota National Guard or other military reserves who is ordered into active military service, as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 190.05, subdivision 5b or 5c, as stated in the person’s military orders, for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. The deferment is not an elimination of the assessment, but rather a temporary pause of paying the assessment until the hardship no longer exists. Interest on deferred assessments shall be subject to and charged at the interest rate set by the City Council on its resolution adopting the special assessment, and such interest shall accrue on said principal until the special assessment is paid in full. The option of the property owner to defer the payment of special assessments shall terminate and all amounts accumulated plus accrued interest (compounded annually) shall become due and payable within sixty (60) days upon the occurrence of any of the following events: (1) The sale, transfer, or subdivision of the property or any part thereof, or the property is in any way conveyed to another person; or (2) The subject property loses its homestead status for any reason; or (3) The death of the owner qualified for deferral status unless a surviving spouse is eligible for benefits hereunder; or (4) If for any reason the City Council determines that there would be no hardship in requiring an immediate or partial payment of the deferred special assessment. To request deferral of a special assessment, the property owner must request a deferment on the form prescribed by the City Clerk within thirty (30) days after the adoption of the improvement assessment by the City Council. The applicant must submit a copy of the federal income tax return from the year prior to the assessment to verify that all sources of income do not exceed the very low-income limits for the Carver County area as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The property must be the applicant’s principal residence and classified on the real estate tax rolls as the applicant’s homestead. City staff will review the application and if the applicant meets the standards and guidelines above, the deferment will be granted. The City Council has the discretion to make the determination that a hardship exists based on exceptional and unusual circumstances not covered by the standards and guidelines where the determination is made in a 202 Page 5 of 5 nondiscriminatory manner and does not give the applicant an unreasonable preference or advantage over other applicants. *Permanent and total disability shall have the same definition for purposes of assessment deferral as is used for social security. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS A Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document addressing the most common questions concerning assessments is attached to this policy and can also be found on the City’s website. 203 Page 1 of 2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN ASSESSMENT POLICY Last updated January 2022 The City of Chanhassen’s Assessment Policy is intended to provide general direction to City Staff and their consultants in preparation of assessment rolls to ensure fair and consistent treatment of all properties within the City that are subject to an assessment. This document will also be used to educate and explain to property owners about the Policy. All assessments shall follow the process outlined in Minnesota State Statues, Chapter 429, which gives the City the legal authority to assess property. This Policy may not apply in all circumstances, at which time the City Council may direct staff to determine an alternate assessment methodology. All benefiting properties that currently have access, or may have future access, to the public street being reconstructed or rehabilitated shall be included in the assessment roll. This includes property with a shared driveway or private street access to the public street, except where said private street meets applicable criteria to allow for a reduced or no assessment. Applicable criteria includes whether the private street has standard street width, section, and turn-around. There are various ways to calculate assessments, typically done based on the number of parcels, an area, or linear foot calculation. The City shall use the calculation method that creates a reasonable distribution of assessments across the entire roll. When more than one “neighborhood” is contained within the same project, the assessment shall be calculated per each neighborhood, rather than the total project. Public property, private associations, and non-profits will be included in the calculations. Commercial, Medium, and High Density Residential property shall be assessed based on a reasonable determination of vehicular traffic generated. NEW CONSTRUCTION: 100% assessed to all benefitting properties. New construction is typically paid for by the development itself and therefore not formally assessed. In some instances, the City will undertake proactive installation of public utilities to unserved areas and then assess the benefiting properties for the added service. In other instances properties may petition the City directly for the installation of the public improvement. Assessable Costs Include: • Construction of a new public street, trail and/or sidewalk. • Installation of public water main, storm sewer and/or sanitary sewer system, including appurtenances (structures, valves, hydrants, lift stations, etc.), where it did not previously exist. • Indirect costs (design, legal, and administration fees). Notes: • Oversizing of streets and utilities beyond what is needed for the development itself, are paid for by the City and are typically not assessed. RECONSTRUCTION/REHABILITATION: 40% assessed to all benefitting properties Assessable Costs Include: • Pavement associated with public streets, trails and/or sidewalks. This includes draintile, geotechnical (soil corrections, etc.), and other improvements needed to support the function of the pavement structure. • Curb and gutter, including curb impacted solely by utility improvements. • Driveway pavement directly affected by the project work. • Multi-Modal improvements such as ADA ramps and actuated pedestrian crossings such as Rectangular Rapid- Flashing Beacons (RRFB’s). 204 Page 2 of 2 • Signing and stripping. • Retaining walls required within the Right-of-Way. • Tree removal and/or landscaping improvements directly affected by the project work. • Applicable percentage of indirect costs (design, legal, and admin fees). Notes: • Rehabilitation is typically defined as mill and overlay and/or full depth reclamation activities. • If a residential property benefits from a collector street, the assessment amount shall be based on an equitable formula compared to a typical local roadway, including normalizing to a 31-foot wide street, street section, and other applicable factors. • Pavement projects on streets that provide direct access to Chanhassen property(s) that are being implemented by an adjacent municipality shall not be assessed to the Chanhassen property(s) unless the adjacent municipality is assessing the benefitting property in their jurisdiction as part of the project. • Replacement or repair of existing public water main, storm sewer and/or sanitary sewer shall not be assessed. The City will pay 100% of these improvement costs out of the associated enterprise fund. REGULAR MAINTENANCE: Benefiting properties are not assessed • Activities Include: Pavement patching, pothole filling, crack sealing, chip sealing, sealcoating, and re-stripping. ASSESSMENT PAYMENT OPTIONS • Assessments can be paid in full up front with no charge, or added to annual property taxes with interest. • If elected to be added to annual property taxes, the balance can be paid off at any time during the term if later requested by the property owner. • Interest will be charged to property owners who choose to not pay their assessments in full by November 15th in the year the special assessment is levied. The interest rate will be equal to the average interest cost of the City’s most recent bond issue plus 2%. If the City has not issued bonds in the past year, the City will use the current municipal bond index rate for AAA rated issuers at the time the special assessment is approved. • Unless approved otherwise by the City Council, the maximum financing term for assessments shall be as follows: o $0-$500 1 year o $501-$2,500 5 years o $2,501-$5,000 8 years o $5,001 and above 10 years The City has developed a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document addressing the most common questions concerning assessments. The FAQ document can be found on the City’s website. 205 G:\ENG\Assessments\Assessment FAQ 2022 Update - Clean.docx Page 1 of 2 What are assessments? Assessments are charges to benefiting properties utilized to help finance an improvement project. In Chanhassen and most metro area cities, assessments are used to help finance street reconstruction and rehabilitation projects. These projects are programmed via the Pavement Management Program (PMP). Minnesota State Statutes, Chapter 429, allows the City the authority to assess for projects. Who is assessed for a street improvement project? Owners of property that directly access a public street, or that have a private driveway that has access to a public street, or that have potential future access within the project area are assessed. These properties are determined to be “benefitting properties” and are assessed a cost based on the City’s Assessment Policy. Does the City have an Assessment Policy? Yes. It can be found on the City’s website at this location: https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/432/Assessment-Policy The City started assessing for street improvements in 1993. The Policy was last updated in January 2022. For the construction of a new public streets or public utilities, 100% of the cost is assessed to the benefitting properties. For an improvement project of an existing street, 40% of the cost is assessed to the benefitting properties and the City pays 60% of the street improvement cost. 100% of the public storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water main costs associated with the project are paid by the associated utility enterprise funds and are not included in the cost assessed to the benefitting properties. Why does the City assess for street improvement projects? Why doesn’t the City pay 100% of the project cost? Public streets are part of the City’s Multi-Modal transportation system to provide access to all residents. The City acknowledges the system benefit of a street project by paying 60% of the project cost. Benefitting properties use the roads to get to and from their property on a daily basis, which is why they are assessed 40% of the street project cost. When someone buys a new home in a new subdivision, the cost to construct the new infrastructure was incorporated into the purchase price of the home and property by the Developer and thus was the initial assessment to the property. When is the assessment amount determined? An estimate of the assessment is calculated with the Feasibility Study, which is typically completed six months to a year before a project begins. The final assessment amount is based on the lowest responsible bid amount and is set by City Council at the assessment hearing, CITY OF CHANHASSEN FAQs: ASSESSMENTS 206 G:\ENG\Assessments\Assessment FAQ 2022 Update - Clean.docx Page 2 of 2 which typically occurs in April or May of the construction year. Properties being assessed for the project are notified of the assessment hearing formally by US mail, but the process is also communicated by the City via its website, public open houses, the Chanhassen Connection, social media, and at City Council meetings. What are the payment options for assessments? Please refer to the timeline below for payment options. The City does not accept partial payments of the assessment. Assessment Hearing & final assessment amount is determined and the Assessment Roll is adopted Payments received by this date are not charged interest Payments received by this date are charged the interest that has accrued from the date the Assessment Roll is adopted Annual payments to the assessment are paid with your property taxes. Interest is collected each year based on the outstanding principle owed on the assessment April or May (typically) 90 days after the Assessment Roll is adopted End of the year Term of the assessment* *You can pay off an assessment after it has been certified to your property taxes. The City of Chanhassen Finance Department will calculate the payoff amount, which will include the interest. The Term is based on a tiered amount found in the Policy. Why does the City charge interest on assessments? The City finances the entire project cost until all the assessments have been paid. The interest charged on assessments is the rate the City pays for the bonding (as of the date of the assessment) plus 2%. The interest charged is calculated as simple interest and not a compound interest. Benefitting property owners are encouraged to consult private financial institutions for other ways that can be used to pay off the assessment. This allows the property owner the ability to negotiate the term and interest rates within the competitive market and may have some tax advantages. What does the Franchise Fees Pay for? The Franchise Fees (passed in 2018) help pay for the City’s cost of the project. In lieu of Franchise Fees, the annual property tax levy would have to be adjusted to fund the overall Pavement Management Program (PMP). How can I provide input on the project and the planned improvements? A couple ways: 1. The City and their design consultants typically hold 2 public open houses during the project implementation process. You can attend one or both of these and verbally discuss the project or provide written comments on a comment card at those meetings. 2. Call the City’s Engineering Department at (952) 227-1160 and talk to one of the staff working on the project. 3. E-mail the City’s Engineering Department at Engineering@ci.chanhassen.mn.us and provide your comments or concerns. 207 Assessment Policy Updates City Council Work Session February 10, 2025 208 Agenda This is a follow-up from our City Council Work Session back on June 24, 2024 1.Assessment Policy language updates a)Provide clarification b)Provide additional context and details 2.Ways to help the cost burden a)Interest Rate b)Term c)Consideration of a Flat Rate 209 Assessment Policy Language Updates A redlined version was attached to the staff report. Highlights include: •How assessments are calculated •Additional clarification on what’s included in the calculations o Note: Adding new sidewalks/trails won’t be included in assessable costs •Adding deferment language NOTE: Should there be support for moving to a Flat-Rate, much of the language would need to be revised 210 Ways to help the cost burden Interest Rate Current Assessment Policy states: “The interest rate will be equal to the average interest cost of the City’s most recent bond issue plus 2%. If the City has not issued bonds in the past year, the City will use the current municipal bond index rate for AAA rated issuers at the time the special assessment is approved.” Staff proposal: “The interest rate will be equal to the yield on the 7-year Treasury Note on the date the special assessment roll is adopted, plus 1%.” Exist. 4.5% + 2.0% = 6.5% Prop. 4.6% + 1.0% = 5.6% 211 Ways to help the cost burden Term Add longer terms for higher assessment amounts Amount Existing Term Proposed Term $0-$500 1 year 1 year $501-$2,500 5 years 5 years $2,501-$5,000 8 years 8 years $5,001-$10,000 10 years 10 years $10,001-$50,000 10 years 15 years $50,001 and above 10 years 20 years 212 Ways to help the cost burden – Flat Rate Mill and Overlay •A flat rate (per inch of new pavement) could be used o M&O projects have varying depths of pavement replacement •The rate would initially be set at $1,450/Inch, which is approximately the 20-yr average (adjusted for inflation). o A typical 2” M&O would therefore be $2,900 •The midpoint of the probable special benefit received by a M&O is $4,893 213 Ways to help the cost burden – Flat Rate Full Depth Reclamation •A flat rate could be used •Since an FDR is “Full Depth” and the new pavement section is standard, the existing pavement section doesn’t have a large impact on cost •The proposed rate would initially be set at $3,900, which is approximately the 3-year average (adjusted for inflation) •The midpoint of probable special benefit received by a FDR is $6,438 214 Ways to help the cost burden – Flat Rate Full Reconstruction •A flat rate could be used •Since the pavement section would all be new and consistent, the existing conditions don’t have a large impact on cost •The proposed rate would initially be set at $8,100, which is the average assessment for full reconstruction projects completed since 2004 (adjusted for inflation) •The midpoint of probable special benefit received by a full depth reconstruction with sewer and water replacement is $9,013 215 Ways to help the cost burden – Flat Rate The rates would be adjusted annually with the adoption of the Fee Schedule •The annual adjustment would be tied to a construction inflation indicator •Every 5 years, a more detailed review of costs could be used to reconcile the rates if deemed necessary, including updating the probable special benefit appraisal •The MS 429 process will still be utilized Rehabilitation Type Flat Rate Assessment Mill and Overlay $ 1,450/inch Full Depth Reclamation $ 3,900 Full Reconstruction $ 8,100 216 Ways to help the cost burden - Flat Rate Funding Impact •Has potential risk of shifting more cost to the city’s funding side o It’s difficult to predict with any certainty o For 25-01, estimate is $608,500 in additional city costs (it’s looking to be a high assessment year) o For 20-03, the amount would have been $380,000 in additional city costs o For 22-01, the city would have saved $158,100 o Previous data suggests 56% of the time it would have cost the city more •A reasonable assumption would be to plan for $300,000/year in additional city costs •This amount obviously has an impact to the PMP Fund, but does not jeopardize completing the programmed 10-year projects o The fund balance would remain strong at the end of the 10-year period o Risk for more fluctuation in cash flow and the short-term fund balance 217 Ways to help the cost burden – Flat Rate So, why do this? The Pro’s vastly outweigh the Con’s….and this would dramatically simplify the process Pro’s Con’s It creates a known amount •easier for the residents to plan for Financial risk more often than not would fall on the City It’s far easier to administer •savings on consultant costs and city staff time Only applies to Low-Density Single-Family property •other types will remain formula based (traffic) •the Per Unit amount is known It’s fair, equitable, and repeatable Minor short-term Impact on PMP Fund It’s easier to understand and communicate Public opinion concerning previous assessments The proposed rates fall within the probable special benefit test •reduces risk of being challenged 218 Next Steps/Options 1.Formally adopt a revised Assessment Policy at the February 24, 2025 City Council meeting a)Accept some or all of the proposed edits 2.Formally adopt a revised Fee Schedule at the March 10, 2025 City Council meeting a)If Flat Rate is desired 3.Implement on 2025 projects OR 1. Leave unchanged and proceed with current Assessment Policy 219 Questions/Comments 220 Assessment Policy Updates City Council Work Session March 24, 2025 *Continued from February 10, 2025 221 Agenda A.Answer the questions that Council had on 2/10/25 B.Recap the policy language edits, change in Term, and the change in Interest Rate C.Review the Flat Rate suggestion D.Other situations to consider 222 Things we heard from Council 1.Don’t mix assessment calculation methodologies a)To the extent practicable, this will be the intent 2.Honor last year’s commitment to Chapel Hill and don’t assess them again with 25-01 a)Acknowledged 3.Add an example calculation into the assessment FAQ a)Acknowledged 223 Things we heard from Council 4.Revisit the change in Term internally a)We eliminated the 20-yr term from the proposed schedule adjustment 5.How many anomalies (Ches Mar example) are there in the future? a)There are a few examples in the 10-yr CIP that are solely SF residential •31-01 Longacres FDR (plan on this being an MSA route by then) •31-01 Lake Lucy Ln Recon (Adding Sewer/Water will increase the assessments) 4.Identify the actual impact to the PMP over the 10-yrs if the Flat Rate was implemented a)Part of the Flat Rate discussion 224 Policy Language Updates Highlights include: •Clarification on how assessments are calculated •Additional clarification on what’s included in the calculations o Note: Adding new sidewalks/trails won’t be included in assessable costs •Adding the deferment language NOTE: Should there be support for moving to a Flat Rate, much of the language would need to be revised, which is not included in the Draft redlines 225 Interest Rate Current Assessment Policy states: “The interest rate will be equal to the average interest cost of the City’s most recent bond issue plus 2%. If the City has not issued bonds in the past year, the City will use the current municipal bond index rate for AAA rated issuers at the time the special assessment is approved.” Proposal: “The interest rate will be equal to the yield on the 7-year Treasury Note on the date the special assessment roll is adopted, plus 1%.” Exist. 4.5% + 2.0% = 6.5% Prop. 4.6% + 1.0% = 5.6% 226 Payback Terms Add longer terms for higher assessment amounts Amount Existing Proposed $0-$500 1 year 1 year $501-$2,500 5 years 5 years $2,501-$5,000 8 years 8 years $5,001-$15,000 10 years 10 years $15,001 and higher 10 years 15 years 227 Flat Rate - Mill and Overlay •Potentially switch to a flat rate (per inch of new pavement) o M&O projects have varying depths of pavement replacement •The rate would initially be set at $1,425/Inch o The average of the actual assessment from the last 20-yrs together with the calculated assessments for the future 10-yr CIP (adjusted for inflation @ 3%) is $1,397/Inch o Taking into account the number of parcels (density) of the planned projects, and balancing the assessed cost vs. city cost, the amount needs to be adjusted up from the average rate o A typical 2” M&O would therefore be $2,850/unit in 2025 o Communicated goal posts indicated $2,000 - $4,000/unit (based on historical averages) o The midpoint of a probable special benefit received by a M&O is $4,893/unit ~41.8% higher than the proposed amount 228 Flat Rate - Full Depth Reclamation •Potentially switch to a flat rate •Since an FDR is “Full Depth” and the new pavement section is standard, the existing pavement section doesn’t have a material impact on the cost •The proposed flat rate would initially be set at $5,000/unit o The average of the actual assessment from the last 5-yrs together with the calculated assessments for the future 10-yr CIP (adjusted for inflation @ 3%) is $4,747/unit o Taking into account the number of parcels (density) of the planned projects, and balancing the assessed cost vs. city cost, the amount needs to be adjusted up from the average rate o Communicated goal posts indicated $3,000 - $5,000/unit (based on historical averages) o The midpoint of a probable special benefit received by a FDR is $6,438/unit ~22.7% higher than the proposed amount 229 Flat Rate - Full Reconstruction •Potentially switch to a flat rate •The proposed rate would initially be set at $9,010/unit (capped by the probable special benefit) o The average assessment for full reconstruction projects completed since 2004 (adjusted for inflation) was $8,100/unit o The average assessment for future reconstruction projects over the next 10-yrs (adjusted for inflation @ 3%) is calculated at $16,032/unit Based on the number of parcels (density), this would shift ~$3.47M in costs from assessments to the City (an average of $347k/yr) o Communicated goal posts indicated $8,000 - $10,000/unit (based on historical averages) o The midpoint of a probable special benefit received by a reconstruction project with sewer and water replacement is $9,013/unit 230 Flat Rate - Funding Impact At the 2/10/25 work session, we reported a reasonable assumption would be to plan for $300k per year in shifted city cost burden if we switched to a Flat Rate •For M&O and FDR projects, the flat rate equalizes the cost burden at the end of the 10 years •For Reconstruction projects, the flat rate would mean shifting approximately $347k per year on average from Recon project assessments to a city cost •This is not requested new revenue, it’s leveraging existing fund balance •This amount does not jeopardize completing the programmed 10-year projects with the current funding levels o The ending fund balance after 10 years maintains the minimum level desired by our financial policies o There is a short-term hit in the fund balance due to a heavy reconstruction load the next couple of years 231 Flat Rate – Fee Schedule The Flat Rates would be reviewed annually with the adoption of the Fee Schedule •The annual adjustment would be tied to a construction inflation indicator (3% was used for the cost projections), but since the feasibility studies are typically completed by December, the actual project projections would be known •Every 3 -5 years, a more detailed review of costs would be done to reconcile the rates if deemed necessary, including updating the probable special benefit appraisal •The MS 429 process will still be used Rehabilitation Type Flat Rate Assessment Mill and Overlay $ 1,425/inch Full Depth Reclamation $ 5,000/unit Full Reconstruction $ 9,010/unit 232 So, why do a Flat Rate? Staff feels that the Pro’s outweigh the Con’s Pro’s Con’s It creates a known amount •Easier for the residents to plan for Annual cost shift from assessments to the City •Recon projects only It’s easier to administer •Savings on consultant costs and city staff time Only applies to Single-Family property •Other types will remain formula based •The formula gets simplified however, due to the Flat Rate being known It’s fair, equitable, and repeatable Short-term impact on PMP Fund It’s easier to understand and communicate Public opinion concerning previous assessments •Only a few outliers The 10-yr CIP can still be accomplished with current funding The proposed rates fall within the probable special benefit test 233 Some Other Options Use a Flat Rate for only the M&O and FDR projects as there is minimal cost risk •Recon projects could be calculated project specific *No initial change in city cost burden, but Recon assessments are predicted to be higher than typical. Concern with meeting the special benefit test, and therefore a decision would need to be made to move ahead or have the city cover the cost anyway Other options: •Use a different % for the assessments (direct relationship with city cost burden) •Assess for only certain elements of the project, i.e. pavement and curb (city cost burden would go up) •Do a special benefit appraisal for each project, and cap the assessment at that amount (city cost burden would likely go down, but an added expense ~$8,000) •Raise Franchise Fee (city cost burden would go down) •Eliminate assessments (alternate funding source would be needed) •Alter the 10-yr CIP, focusing on the schedule of the Recon projects (no change in city cost burden) •Alter the 10-yr CIP scope by switching some/all Recon’s to FDR (utilities risk) 234 Some Scenario’s to review Some future project examples that don’t “fit” nicely: •Review the 27-01 project example •Review the 28-01 project example 235 Next Steps A. Provide direction on what aspects of the Policy updates Council would like to move forward with •Staff will formalize the redlined version and could bring to the April 14, 2025 City Council meeting for adoption •If a Flat Rate is supported, Council would also have to formally adopt a revised Fee Schedule B. Pose additional questions for staff to come back at a future work session with more information C. Leave unchanged and proceed with the current Assessment Policy 236 Questions/Comments 237 Assessment Policy Updates City Council Work Session April 14, 2025 *Continued from March 24, 2025 238 Agenda A.Present additional information that the City Council inquired about on 3/24/25 B.Discuss the language updates and/or the Flat Rate consideration 239 Things we heard from Council 1.Generally, the Council seemed interested in pursuing the flat rate model, but more discussion was needed before moving ahead with Policy 2.Have a prescribed methodology for which rehabilitation project type will be used 3.Have a prescribed methodology for what thickness would be used on a Mill and Overlay project •Assuming the position that we assess on a per/inch basis 4.Give an example of a real project 5.Why has the cost of reconstruction projects gone up so much? 240 Rehabilitation Planning Decision Matrix Notes: •The matrix is intended to be used as a guide for development of CIP and for baseline communications •2-in will be the standard depth for all M&O, unless particular circumstances exist •Once design is underway, pavement coring and soil borings are used to verify existing pavement section thicknesses and drainage conditions •Reasonable engineering best practices will be utilized to verify the rehab type for all projects Question If Yes If No Does the street need to change its intended use; change to meet our current standard (width, thickness, C&G, drainage, etc.); and/or has it met its useful service life (~50 yrs)? Plan for Reconstruction Move to next question Is the pavement condition OCI between 0 and 29?Plan for Reconstruction Move to next question Is the pavement condition OCI between 30 and 59?Plan for FDR Move to next question Is the pavement condition OCI greater than 60?Plan for M&O n/a 241 Flat Rate - Mill and Overlay Opt. 1 •Use a flat rate per inch of new pavement o Cost/Inch allows for varying depths of M&O •The rate would initially be set at $1,425/Inch o The average of the actual assessment from the last 20-yrs together with the calculated assessments for the future 10-yr CIP (adjusted for inflation @ 3%) is $1,397/Inch o Taking into account the number of parcels (density) of the planned projects, and balancing the assessed cost vs. city cost, the amount needs to be adjusted up from the average rate o A typical 2” M&O would therefore be $2,850/unit in 2025 o Previously communicated range has been $2,000 - $4,000/unit (based on historical averages) o The midpoint of a probable special benefit received by a M&O is $4,893/unit ~41.8% higher than the proposed amount 242 Flat Rate - Mill and Overlay Opt. 2 •Use a flat rate regardless of depth utilized •The rate would initially be set at $2,850 o Rate was based on the cost analysis for the most common thickness (2”) o This would likely eliminate the use of a full depth M&O technique due to cost vs. an FDR 243 Flat Rate - Full Depth Reclamation •Use a flat rate •Since an FDR is “Full Depth” and the new pavement section is a typical standard, the existing pavement section doesn’t have a material impact on the cost •The proposed flat rate would initially be set at $5,000/unit o The average of the actual assessment from the last 5-yrs together with the calculated assessments for the future 10-yr CIP (adjusted for inflation @ 3%) is $4,506/unit o Taking into account the number of parcels (density) of the planned projects, and balancing the assessed cost vs. city cost, the amount needs to be adjusted up from the average rate o Previously communicated range has been $3,000 - $5,000/unit (based on historical averages) o The midpoint of a probable special benefit received by a FDR is $6,438/unit ~22.7% higher than the proposed amount 244 Flat Rate - Full Reconstruction •Use a flat rate •The proposed rate would initially be set at $9,010/unit (Option 1) o The average assessment for full reconstruction projects completed since 2004 (adjusted for inflation) was $8,097/unit o The average assessment for future reconstruction projects over the next 10-yrs (adjusted for inflation @ 3%) is calculated at $16,168/unit Based on the number of parcels (density), this would shift ~$3.56M in costs from assessments to the City (an average of $356k/yr) o Previously communicated range has been $8,000 - $10,000/unit (based on historical averages) o The midpoint of a probable special benefit received by a reconstruction project with sewer and water replacement is $9,013/unit The high side of the range is $9,270/unit (Option 2) Using this value decreases the 10-yr total cost shift by $115k 245 Flat Rate – Fee Schedule The Flat Rates would be reviewed annually with the adoption of the Fee Schedule •The annual adjustment would be tied to a construction inflation indicator (3% was used for the cost projections), but since the feasibility studies are typically completed by December, the actual project projections should be known •Every 3 -5 years, a more detailed review of costs would be done to reconcile the rates if deemed necessary, including updating the probable special benefit appraisal •The MS 429 process will still be used Rehabilitation Type Flat Rate Assessment Mill and Overlay Option 1 $ 1,425/inch Option 2 $ 2,850/unit Full Depth Reclamation $ 5,000/unit Full Reconstruction Option 1 $ 9,010/unit if using mid-point Option 2 $ 9,270/unit if using high-end 246 Flat Rate - Funding Impact •For M&O and FDR projects, the flat rate would be cost neutral at the end of the 10-year CIP period •For Reconstruction projects, the flat rate would mean shifting approximately $356k per year from assessments to a city cost 2025 Bid results: $472k in PMP Fund savings •This is not requested new revenue, it’s leveraging existing fund balance •This amount does not jeopardize completing the programmed 10-year projects with the current funding levels o The ending fund balance after 10 years maintains the minimum level desired by our financial policies o There is a short-term hit in the fund balance due to a heavy reconstruction load the next couple of years 247 2025 Funding Impact – Real project example 25-01 Bid Results Type Flat Rate Preliminary Final Units PMP Cost shift of assessments to city if using Flat Rate* FDR $5,000/unit $4,502 $7,894 $4,131 $7,608 59 45 $66,089 Recon $9,010/unit $15,393 $16,617 78 $593,346 *Overall PMP Fund cost savings of 25-01 bid = $224,340 Crimson Bay Road was just bid, however this project is one of the unique ones that wouldn’t be proposed for a Flat Rate due to extending public Sewer and Water o The bid results were very favorable •Preliminary Assessment $40,815 •Final Assessment $29,697 Overall PMP Fund cost savings $247,740 248 Reconstruction Cost Increases Why has the cost of Reconstruction projects gone up in comparison to other rehabilitation types? •Contractor risk o Staging, access •Level of effort o Compound interest analogy, the more involved the project, the more things affect expense o More sub-contracted work •We’re not the only city experiencing this 249 Next Steps/Options A. Provide direction on what aspects of the Policy updates the City Council would like to move forward with •Staff will formalize the redlined version and could bring it to the April 28, 2025 City Council meeting for adoption •If a Flat Rate is supported, the Council would also have to formally adopt a revised Fee Schedule B. Pose additional questions for staff to come back at a future work session with more information C. Leave unchanged and proceed with the current Assessment Policy 250 Questions/Comments 251 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item Resolution 2025-XX: Approve Application of Hackamore Brewing Company to Dispense Intoxicating Liquor off premises in Lake Ann Park during the 2025 Chanhassen Summer Concert Series File No.Item No: D.13 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Jenny Potter, City Clerk Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution approving the application of Hackamore Brewing Company to dispense intoxicating liquor off premises in Lake Ann Park during the 2025 Chanhassen Summer Concert Series." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION As part of the 2025 Summer Concert Series, the Parks & Recreation Department has invited Hackamore Brewing Company to sell beer at the 2025 Summer Concert Series events between 6:00-8:00 p.m. in Lake Ann Park on the following Thursdays: June 12 252 June 19 June 26 July 10 July 17 July 24 July 31 August 7 As shown on the attached map, the serving location for the beer would be restricted to the east of the lower parking lot of Lake Ann, with the consumption area restricted to the area shown on the map. Hackamore Brewing Company will need to pay a $50 application fee prior to approval of selling at the 2025 Concert Series. A certificate of insurance for liquor must be provided for the application to be approved. It is attached. BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing Hackamore Brewing Company to sell beer off premises at Lake Ann Park between 6:00-8:00 p.m. during the 2025 Summer Concert Series on the dates outlined in the resolution. ATTACHMENTS Resolution Certificate of Insurance Community Festival Permit Application 2025 Lake Ann Liquor License Map 253 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: May 5, 2024 RESOLUTION NO: 2025-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING HACKAMORE BREWING COMPANY TO DISPENSE INTOXICATING LIQUOR OFF PREMISES IN LAKE ANN PARK DURING THE 2025 CHANHASSEN SUMMER CONCERT SERIES WHEREAS,the City’s Parks & Recreation Department annually hosts a Summer Concert Series during the Summer in Lake Ann Park; and WHEREAS,Chanhassen City Code authorizes the City Council to authorize a holder of a retail on-sale intoxicating liquor license issued by the City to dispense intoxicating liquor off premises at a Community Festival occurring at a park within the City; and WHEREAS,a Community Festival is an event held within the City that has broad community appeal and the objective of promoting a spirit of pride in the City, a sense of community and an atmosphere of celebration for all residents of the City, and which has been organized by or in partnership with the City of Chanhassen; and WHEREAS, the Summer Concert Series is considered a Community Festival; and WHEREAS,the City has invited Hackamore Brewing Company to sell beer at this summer’s concert events; and WHEREAS,Hackamore Brewing Company has submitted an application and paid the required application fee requesting City Council authorization to sell beer at the 2025 Summer Concert Series. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby authorizes Chanhassen Brewing Company to dispense intoxicating liquor off premises at the 2025 Summer Concert Series located in Lake Ann Park between 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. on the following Thursdays in June, July, and August, 2025: June 12 June 19 June 26 July 10 July 17 July 24 July 31 August 7 254 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 5 th day of May, 2025. ATTEST: Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 255 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURER F : INSURER E : INSURER D : INSURER C : INSURER B : INSURER A : NAIC # NAME:CONTACT (A/C, No):FAX E-MAILADDRESS: PRODUCER (A/C, No, Ext):PHONE INSURED REVISION NUMBER:CERTIFICATE NUMBER:COVERAGES IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. OTHER: (Per accident) (Ea accident) $ $ N / A SUBR WVD ADDL INSD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. $ $ $ $PROPERTY DAMAGE BODILY INJURY (Per accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT AUTOS ONLY AUTOSAUTOS ONLY NON-OWNED SCHEDULEDOWNED ANY AUTO AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY Y / N WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory in NH) DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below If yes, describe under ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE $ $ $ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE E.L. EACH ACCIDENT EROTH-STATUTEPER LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY)POLICY EXP(MM/DD/YYYY)POLICY EFFPOLICY NUMBERTYPE OF INSURANCELTRINSR DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) EXCESS LIAB UMBRELLA LIAB $EACH OCCURRENCE $AGGREGATE $ OCCUR CLAIMS-MADE DED RETENTION $ $PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $GENERAL AGGREGATE $PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $MED EXP (Any one person) $EACH OCCURRENCE DAMAGE TO RENTED $PREMISES (Ea occurrence) COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY PRO-JECT LOC CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) CANCELLATION AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ACORD 25 (2016/03) © 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. CERTIFICATE HOLDER The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD HIRED AUTOS ONLY 3/4/2025 Miller-Hartwig Insurance PO Box 1177 Lakeville MN 55044 Josh Havlik 952-469-5502 952-469-1881 JHavlik@millerhartwig.com Cincinnati Insurance Co 10677 HACKBRE-01 SFM Mutual Insurance Co 11347HackamoreBrewingCoLLC 18651 Lake Dr E Chanhassen MN 55317 407121252 A X 1,000,000 X 500,000 5,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 X Y Y ETD 0658673 7/1/2024 7/1/2025 2,000,000 A 1,000,000 X X ETD 0658673 7/1/2024 7/1/2025 A X X 4,000,000YETD06586737/1/2024Y 7/1/2025 B X189468.201 2/1/2025 2/1/2026 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 A Liquor Liability ETD 0658673 7/1/2024 7/1/2025 occ/agg 1000000/2000000 -Brewery and Taproom-18651 Lake Dr E Chanhassen MN 55317 Liquor Liability is continuous until cancelled meaning notice will be given for any cancellation,non-renewal,failure to pick up a renewal,or any other policy interruption.Liquor liability coverage is not location specific and covers any patios and off-premises events provided a valid liquor license is in-force.Additional Insured status,waiver,and primary non-contributory language are extended by endorsement "as required by written contract or agreement"to specified relationships.Forms are available upon request. City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen 55317 256 A Community Festival is an event held within the city that has broad community appeal and the objective of promoting a spirit of pride in the city, a sense of community, and an atrnosphere of celebration for all residents of the city, and which has been organized by or in partnership with the City of Chanhassen. Minn. Stat. 6 340A.404. subd. 4(b) and Chaoter 10. Article IL Division 2. Section 10-19(0) of the Chanhassen Citv Code authorizes the holder of a retail on-sale intoxicating liquor license issued by the City of Chanhassen to appv for a permit to dispense intoxicating liquor off the licensed premises at a Community Festival held within the City. This form shall be submitted by an on-sale licensee seeking approval under the above-cited authority. I(m! This application requires City Council approval and must be submitted at least thirty (30) days prior to the desired City Council date. City Council meetings are held on the second and fourth Monday of every month, APPLICANT INFORMATION * Business Name Hackamore Brewing Company * Business Address 18651 Lake Dr E Sub-Heading * Type of Liquor License Issued On-Sale Brewer Taproom * Applicant Name zac Gleason * Applicant Email zac@hackamorebrewing,com * Applicant Phone Numb€r (763) 381-{384 COMMUilITY EVENT INFORMATION * ilameofEvent Chanhassen Concert Series t Date(s) of Communlty EYent Thursday, June 12th (kickofi event) Thursday, June 19th Thursday, lune 25th Thursday, luly 10th Thursday, July 17th Thursday, July 24th Thursday, luly 31st Thursday, August 7th (weather backup) * Locauon wlrerc Community Eyent wlll be held Lake Anne a Describe the specific locauon where liquor will b€ dlsp€nsed Location: Lake Ann Park (1456 W 78th S0 I believe by the boat launch Optional - Upload a Map or Drawing showing the specific location where liquor will be dispensed **SKIPPED** * List the liquor product(s) that will b€ s€rved Various beers and settrers * Describ€ liquor sales secilrity and how your establishment will detemine If customerc are of legal drinking age ln order to prevent consumption by underage indivaduals Selling draft and canned beer and selEer Optional - Upload additional liquor sales security and prevention of underage consumption information * *SKIPPEDX* * Attach Certificate of Uquor Liability Insurance stating that the liquor liability insurance covers the area of the Event, as required by law Certificate of Liability Insurance.pdf Page | 1 257 Additiona! Informauon you would like to provide (if any) **SKIPPEDt* SIGNATURE By entering your full name ln the Slgnahtre 8ox b€low, you het€by authodze the Clty ot Chanhassen to acccss all soures of lnfomauon whlch may be consulted to ycrlfy the lnformauon provlded above. You atso certlfy that you haye complcted thls appllcatlon tnrthlully and correcty to the best of your lcrowledge. * Signature Box zac Gleason FEE A $50 Pemit Fe€ must be paid as a part of this application prior to permit issuance. Online payment is currentv unavaihble. Mail to or drop off a ched at City Hall during regular business hours: Chanhassen City Hall Attn: City Clerk 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 (r.se PO Box if mailing) Chanhassen. MN 55317 Or pay by credit card at City Hall during regular business hours. Pkase direct questions to the Chanhassen City Clerk by calling 952-227-1 107 or emailing clerk@chanhassenmn.oov. Page | 2 258 Beer Sales LocationLake AnnPark DriveCarver County GIS Document Path: K:\Departments\Parks\Liquor License Map\Liquor License Map.aprxDate Created: 3/12/2025 Created By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department µ0 0.01 Mile 0 90 Feet Lake Ann Park - Approved Liquor Areas Chanhassen Liquor License Map 259 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item Approve Resolution Rescinding Resolution No. 2025-24 Adopted on March 24, 2025; and Approving the Authorization for the Issuance and Sale of an Amount Not to Exceed $13,185,000 General Obligation Temporary Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2025A. File No.Item No: D.14 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the resolution Rescinding Resolution No. 2025-24 Adopted on March 24, 2025; and Approving the Authorization for the Issuance and Sale of an Amount Not to Exceed $13,185,000 General Obligation Temporary Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2025A." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Financial Sustainability SUMMARY City voters authorized a new local option sales tax and the issuance of up to $40 million in general obligation sales tax revenue bonds for the Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center project through a referendum election held on November 5, 2024. The city is currently working on a purchase agreement for the land upon which the Community Center will be built. The city expects to close on the land purchase in the next few months and plans to issue temporary bonds to finance the land purchase, sitework, and design costs. The proposed amount of the bonds is up to $13,185,000, with $13 million allocated for the land purchase and $185,000 allocated for issuance costs, including the underwriter's discount and other costs of issuance. The seller of the land is offering a credit of $300,000 per acre, which may be deducted from 260 the purchase price, or it will be issued as a refund to be used for project costs. The principal amount of the bond issue will ultimately depend on how the per acre credit is given. On February 24, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-19, which authorized the call for the sale of the bonds and established a March 24, 2025, competitive sale date. When the closing date for the land sale was delayed, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-24, which rescinded Resolution No. 2025-19 and established a new sale date of April 28, 2025. Since the March 24 meeting, the closing date was once again pushed back so staff worked with Ehlers to push back the sale date of the bonds to more closely coincide with the land purchase closing date and avoid interest expense. Based on the uncertainty, Ehlers recommends a flexible timing schedule for the bond sale. The attached resolution would rescind Resolution No. 2025-24 and replace it with a new version, that authorizes the same amount but allows additional discretion for staff and the mayor to determine the timing of the bond sale. Basically, it allows that the bond sale can be executed by the Mayor and City Manager on the council’s behalf as long as the bond issue remains within a set of parameters (drafted as an amount up to $13.185 million, not to exceed 6.0% interest rate, and must be closed by October 2025). The intent will be to have the bond sale on June 9, 2025, but this revised authorization will allow staff to setup the appropriate bond sale date once the land purchase and its anticipated closing date are confirmed. The bond sale would not have to align with a council meeting and could be any Monday through Thursday business date as long as the Mayor and City Manager are available to confirm and approve the bids on that same day. The bond sale results would be presented to the City Council at their next meeting and a resolution would be prepared to ratify the terms of the winning proposal. The temporary bonds will be structured for maturity on February 1, 2028, with interest payments due every six months beginning on February 1, 2026. The city will begin receiving local sales tax proceeds after the tax goes into effect on April 1, 2025. The local sales tax proceeds will be used to pay the interest on the bonds. The bonds will have a call option allowing for prepayment without penalty starting August 1, 2026. The city plans to issue permanent financing for the project in 2026 or 2027. At that time, the city will repay the temporary bonds and issue an additional amount to cover all of the construction costs. The attached calendar and presale report provide additional information. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION 261 Approve the Resolution Rescinding Resolution No. 2025-24 Adopted on March 24, 2025; and Approving the Authorization for the Issuance and Sale of an Amount Not to Exceed $13,185,000 General Obligation Temporary Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2025A. ATTACHMENTS Resolution Pre Sale Report Revised 2025 Temp Bond Schedule of Events 262 172421905v1 EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA HELD: MAY 5, 2025 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular or special meeting of the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Carver and Hennepin Counties, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall on May 5, 2025, at 7:00 P.M., for the purpose, in part, of rescinding Resolution No. 2025-24, adopted on March 24, 2025; and approving the authorization for the issuance and sale of an amount not to exceed $13,185,000 General Obligation Temporary Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2025A. The following members were present: and the following were absent: Member ________________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. ______________ RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 2025-24 ADOPTED ON MARCH 24, 2025; AND APPROVING THE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $13,185,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TEMPORARY SALES TAX REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2025A A.WHEREAS, the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota (the "City") has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's, an amount not to exceed $13,185,000, General Obligation Temporary Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2025A (the "Bonds"), to finance the acquisition of land and project costs for the construction of a new Chan Rec Center, which is expected to include an indoor walking track, indoor ice facilities, indoor playground, indoor fieldhouse, and expanded community center amenities, as outlined in the Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center project plan, to be located in the City; and B.WHEREAS, on March 24, 2025, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-24, entitled "Resolution Providing for the Sale of an Amount Not to Exceed $13,185,000 General Obligation Temporary Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2025A" which provided for the sale of the Bonds on April 28, 2025; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, as follows: 1.It has been determined to move the sale of the Bonds from April 28, 2025 to a date to be determined by the City Manager and the City's municipal advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. ("Ehlers"); and 2.The Council desires to proceed with the sale of the Bonds by private negotiation in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9) and proposals to purchase the Bonds will be solicited by Ehlers. 263 172421905v1 2 3.The Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized to approve the sale of the Bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $13,185,000. 4.The Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized to approve the sale of the Bonds with a true interest cost not to exceed 6.00%. 5.Upon approval of the sale of the Bonds by the Mayor and the City Manager, the Council will take action at a regular or special scheduled meeting thereafter to adopt the necessary approving resolutions as prepared by the City's bond counsel. 6.If the Mayor and City Manager have not approved the sale of the bonds and executed the related bond purchase agreement by October 31, 2025, this resolution shall expire. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member _______________________ and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following Council Members voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 264 172421905v1 3 STATE OF MINNESOTA CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES CITY OF CHANHASSEN I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council, duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as the minutes relate to rescinding Resolution No. 2025-24 adopted on May 5, 2025; and approving the authorization for the issuance and sale of an amount not to exceed $13,185,000 General Obligation Temporary Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2025A. WITNESS my hand on May 5, 2025. __________________________________________ City Manager 265 266 267 268 269 • • 270 271 City of Chanhassen, Minnesota $13,185,000 GO Temporary Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2025A Assumes Current Market Non-BQ "AAA" Rates plus 35bps Sources & Uses Dated 04/17/2025 | Delivered 04/17/2025 Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $13,185,000.00 Total Sources $13,185,000.00 Uses Of Funds Total Underwriter's Discount (0.600%)79,110.00 Costs of Issuance 102,000.00 Deposit to Project Construction Fund 13,000,000.00 Rounding Amount 3,890.00 Total Uses $13,185,000.00 Series 2025A GO Temp Sale | SINGLE PURPOSE | 2/18/2025 | 8:30 AM 272 City of Chanhassen, Minnesota $13,185,000 GO Temporary Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2025A Assumes Current Market Non-BQ "AAA" Rates plus 35bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 04/17/2025 ----- 02/01/2026 --317,245.75 317,245.75 317,245.75 08/01/2026 --201,071.25 201,071.25 - 02/01/2027 --201,071.25 201,071.25 402,142.50 08/01/2027 --201,071.25 201,071.25 - 02/01/2028 13,185,000.00 3.050%201,071.25 13,386,071.25 13,587,142.50 Total $13,185,000.00 -$1,121,530.75 $14,306,530.75 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $36,771.50 Average Life 2.789 Years Average Coupon 3.0500000% Net Interest Cost (NIC)3.2651394% True Interest Cost (TIC)3.2726788% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 3.0461139% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)3.5672414% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 3.0500000% Weighted Average Maturity 2.789 Years Series 2025A GO Temp Sale | SINGLE PURPOSE | 2/18/2025 | 8:30 AM 273 Schedule of Events -Temporary Bonds for Community Center Land Acquisition: General Obligation Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Tuesday, April 22, 2025 Updated presale report and revised call for sale resolution submitted for City Council agenda packets Monday, April 28, 2025 Council to consider call for sale resolution establishing a June 9, 2025 bond sale Monday, May 5, 2025 Update to General Certificate information request submitted to City Staff Friday, May 16, 2025 Draft Preliminary Official Statement (POS) circulated to City Staff and Bond Counsel for internal review Friday, May 23, 2025 Rating call to discuss 2025 Temporary Bonds and updated credit analysis; Due Diligence Call to review Bond offering documents Thursday, May 29, 2025 Bond offering documents distributed to the marketplace Thursday, May 29,2025 Draft Bond Award Resolution provided to City Staff from Bond Counsel for inclusion in City Council agenda packets Monday, June 9, 2025 Bond sale -bids received and presented to Council for formal award through adoption of revised Bond Award Resolution By July 3, 2025 Bonds closing; funds wired to City account(s) for acquisition 274 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item Resolution 2025-XX: Authorize Vegetation Management Services Contract for 2025 File No.N/A Item No: D.15 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Joe Seidl, Water Resources Engineer Reviewed By Charlie Howley SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution authorizing a contract with Natural Shores Technologies, Inc. for performing annual Vegetation Management Services." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY This contract is for annual vegetation and maintenance work associated with the city's stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) and water resources. The project consists of multiple areas around the city and the scope includes a mix of vegetation maintenance and restoration. Establishing proper vegetation around stormwater BMPs and water resources is essential to the city's drainage system functionality. The city, via its MS4 permit, is obligated to maintain its stormwater management infrastructure. Staff is continuing to find older BMPs in need of maintenance as databases are updated. The contract is designed to allow flexibility to maintain additional areas as they are identified. Staff received bids from three (3) qualified companies and selected the lowest bidder, Natural Shore Technologies Inc., who has successfully completed similar work for the city in the past. 275 BACKGROUND N/A DISCUSSION N/A BUDGET This project is an operating expense funded by the Surface Water Management Fund. The city received a total of three (3) bids, ranging from $23,395 to $36,283. A copy of the bid comparison spreadsheet is attached. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends award of the contract to the low bidder, Natural Shore Technologies, Inc. ATTACHMENTS Resolution Non-bid Contract for Vegetation Management 2025 Vegetation Management Bids 2025 Vegetation Management Map 2025 2025 RFQ Scope 2025 Chanhassen Maintenance Sites NST Quote 276 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: May 5, 2025 RESOLUTION NO: 2025-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ENTERING INTO A CONTRACT WITH NATURAL SHORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FOR 2025 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT WHEREAS,the city is obligated to maintain publicly-owned stormwater management infrastructure; and WHEREAS,vegetation management is an important part of maintaining stormwater infrastructure; and WHEREAS,the city scoped an annual project and developed a set of contract documents that were sent to qualified contractors and received three competitive bids; and WHEREAS,funding is available in the Surface Water Utility Fund as an annual operational expense. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby authorizes entering into a contract with Natural Shore Technologies, Inc. for the 2025 Vegetation Management Contract. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 5th dayof May, 2025. ATTEST: Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 277 @BCL@F40D264D.docx 1 NON-BID CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF GOODS AND SERVICES AGREEMENT made this 5th day of May 2025, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN,a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Natural Shore Technologies Inc. a Minnesota Corporation ("Contractor"). IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1.CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the “Contract Documents,” all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A.This Agreement. B.Request for Proposal, dated 18th day of March 2025. C.Contractor’s Quote dated 3rd day of April 2025. In the event of a conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts. Contract Document “A” has the first priority and Contract Document “C” has the last priority. 2.CONTRACTOR OBLIGATIONS.The Contractor shall provide the goods, services and perform the work in accordance with the Contract Documents (“Work”). Contractor shall provide all personnel, supervision, services, materials, tools, equipment and supplies and do all things necessary and ancillary thereto specified in the Contract Documents. 3.CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS. A.Contractor has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents and other related data identified in the Contract Documents. B.Contractor is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local Laws and Regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. C.Contractor has given City written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that Contractor has discovered in the Contract Documents, and the written resolution thereof by City is acceptable to Contractor. D.The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work. 4.COMPENSATION. Contractor shall be paid by the City for the goods andservices described in Paragraph 2 in accordance with the Quote, but not to exceed $23,395 which is inclusive of reimbursable expenses. The fee shall not be adjusted even if the estimated number of hours to 278 @BCL@F40D264D.docx 2 perform a task, or any other estimate, assumption or matter is wrong or exceeded. Payment shall be made periodically after a service has been completed and within thirty-five (35) days of receipt of an invoice. 5.COMPLETION DATE. The Contractor shall complete the Work on or before October 31st, 2024. 6.WARRANTY. The Contractor shall be held responsible for any and all defects in workmanship and materials and upon notification by the Cityshall immediately replace or repair the defective workmanship and materials without cost to the City. The Contractorwarrants that only new unused materials will be used. The Contractor further warrants to the City that all materials and services furnished under the Contract will be in conformance with Contract Documents and that the goods are of merchantable quality and are fit for the use for which they are sold. These warranties are in addition to any manufacturer's standard warranty, and any warranty provided by law. 7.RIGHTS AND REMEDIES. A.The duties and obligations imposed by the Contract Documents, and the rights and remedies available thereunder shall be in addition to, and not a limitation of, any duties, obligations, rights and remedies otherwise imposed or available by law. B.No action, or failure to act, by the City or the Contractor shall constitute a waiver of any right or duty afforded any of them under the Contract, nor shall any such action or failure to act constitute an approval of, or acquiescence in, any breach there under, except as may be specifically agreed in writing. 8.CHANGES TO WORK. Without invalidating the Contract, the City may, at any time, or from time to time, order additions, deletions or revisions in the work provided under this Agreement; these will be authorized by an amendment to the Contract. Upon approval of an amendment, Contractor shall proceed with the work provided under the amendment. Changes in the Contract Price shall be based upon the prices identified in the Quote provided or negotiated between the parties based on similar work provided in the Proposal. 9.UNAUTHORIZED WORK. Additional work performed without authorization of an amendment of this Contract will not entitle Contractor to an increase in the Compensation or an extension of the Contract. 10.DOCUMENTS. The City shall be the owner of all documents, reports, studies, analysis and the like prepared by the Contractor in conjunction with this contract. 11.COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services hereunder, Contractor shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provisions of goods and services to be provided. 12.STANDARD OF CARE. Contractor shall exercise the same degrees of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a professional Contractor under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is 279 @BCL@F40D264D.docx 3 included in this Agreement. City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of Contractor’s services. 13.INDEMNIFICATION. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, and its employees, officials, and agents from and against all claims, actions, damages, losses and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, arising out of Contractor’s negligence or its performance or failure to perform its obligations under this Contract. Contractor’s indemnification obligation shall apply to subcontractor(s), or anyone directly or indirectly employed or hired by Contractor, or anyone for whose acts Contractor may be liable. Contractor agrees this indemnity obligation shall survive the completion or termination of this Contract. 14.INSURANCE. Prior to the start of the project, Contractor shall furnish to the City a certificate of insurance showing proof of the required insurance required under this Paragraph. Contractor shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, such insurance as shall protect Contractor and the City for work covered by the Contract including workers’ compensation claims and property damage, bodily and personal injury which may arise from operations under this Contract, whether such operations are by Contractor or anyone directly or indirectly employed by either of them. The minimum amounts of insurance shall be as follows: Commercial General Liability (or in combination with an umbrella policy) $2,000,000 Each Occurrence $2,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Aggregate $2,000,000 Annual Aggregate The following coverages shall be included: Premises and Operations Bodily Injury and Property Damage Personal and Advertising Injury Blanket Contractual Liability Products and Completed Operations Liability Automobile Liability $2,000,000 Combined Single Limit – Bodily Injury & Property Damage Including Owned, Hired & Non-Owned Automobiles Workers Compensation Workers’ Compensation insurance in accordance with the statutory requirements of the State of Minnesota, including Employer’s Liability with minimum limits are as follows: $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Disease per employee $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Disease aggregate $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Accident The Contractor’s insurance must be “Primary and Non-Contributory”. 280 @BCL@F40D264D.docx 4 All insurance policies (or riders) required by this Contract shall be (i) taken out by and maintained with responsible insurance companies organized under the laws of one of the states of the United States and qualified to do business in the State of Minnesota, (ii) shall name the City, its employees and agents as additional insureds (CGL and umbrella only) by endorsement which shall be filed with the City.A copy of the endorsement must be submitted with the certificate of insurance. Contractor’s policies and Certificate of Insurance shall contain a provision that coverage afforded under the policies shall not be cancelled without at least thirty (30) days’ advanced written notice to the City, or ten (10) days’ notice for non-payment of premium. An Umbrella or Excess Liability insurance policy may be used to supplement Contractor’s policy limits on a follow-form basis to satisfy the full policy limits required by this Contract. 15.INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains the Contractor as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. The Contractor is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Contractor shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Contractor shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Contractor's performance under this Agreement. City and Contractor agree that Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Contractor or any of Contractor's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Contractor shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Contractor's own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 16.SUBCONTRACTORS. Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. Contractor shall comply with Minnesota Statute § 471.425. Contractor must pay Subcontractor for all undisputed services provided by Subcontractor within ten days of Contractor’s receipt of payment from City. Contractor must pay interest of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month to Subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to Subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. 17.ASSIGNMENT. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, nor any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 18.WAIVER. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 19.ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 281 @BCL@F40D264D.docx 5 20.CONTROLLING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 21.COPYRIGHT. Contractor shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or patent by reason of the use or adoption of any designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting there from. 22.RECORDS/AUDIT. The Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records of time and expense involved in the performance of services. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 16C.05, Subd. 5, any books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of City and Contractor relevant to the Agreement are subject to examination by City and Contactor, and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor as appropriate. City and Contractor agree to maintain these records for a period of six years from the date of performance of all servicescovered under this Agreement. 23.MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Contractor must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Contractor pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event Contractor receives a request to release data, Contractor must immediately notify City. City will give Contractor instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Contractor’s officers’, agents’, city’s, partners’, employees’, volunteers’, assignees’ or subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 24.TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by City on two (2) days’ written notice delivered to Contractor at the address on file with the City. Upon termination under this provision if there is no fault of the Contractor, the Contractor shall be paid for goods and services rendered and reimbursable expenses until the effective date of termination. If the City terminates the Agreement because the Contractor has failed to perform in accordance with this Agreement, no further payment shall be made to the Contractor, and the City may retain another Contractor to undertake or complete the work identified in this Agreement. 282 @BCL@F40D264D.docx 6 Dated:____________________CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager By: Elise Ryan, Mayor Dated:_____________________________________________________________ By: Print Name:_________________________________ Its:________________________________________ 283 2025 Chanhassen Vegetation Management Quotes Bidder Hourly Rate Total Cost Landbridge Ecological $98.00 $33,987.00 Natural Shore $94.00 $23,395.00 Prairie Restoration $162.50 $36,282.50 all assumed 50 hrs additional 284 Lake Virginia Christmas Lake Lotus Lake Brendan Pond Lake Harrison Kerber Pond Lake Susan Rice Marsh Lake Lake Riley Rice Lake Lake St. Joe Lake Minnewashta Lake Ann Lake Lucy ST18 ST14 ST15 ST17 ST61 Minnewashta Regional Park North Lotus Lake Park Meadow Green Park Lake Ann Park Chanhassen Pond Park Chanhassen Nature Preserve Chanhassen Recreation Center Lake Susan Park Rice Marsh Lake Preserve Bluff Creek Preserve Power Hill Park Fox Woods Preserve Bandimere Community Park Bluff Creek Golf Course Hesse Farm Park Preserve Lake Susan Preserve Raguet Wildlife Management Are MN Valley National Wildlife Re MN Landscape Arboretum Seminary Fen Scientific & Nat* Independent School District 11 Independent School District 112 Independent School District 276 Riley Ridge Park Lake Ann Park Preserve SA7 SA5 SA101SA41 SA5 )212 GreatPlainsBlvdPowers BlvdLyman Blvd Audubon RdPion e e rT rlGalpinBlvdPowersBl vdFly in g C lo u d D r ST101 ST101 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1516 Document Path: K:\Departments\Engineering\WaterResources\Vegetation Management\2025 Vegetation Management.aprxDate Created: 3/11/2025 Created By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department µ0 0.5 Mile 0 3,000 Feet 2025 Stormwater BMP Maintenance / Vegetation Management City of Chanhassen Legend Stormwater BMP Maintenance / Vegetation Management Locations Map ID Location Name 1 Bandimere Park Pond & Raingardens 2 Filtration Basin Hwy 5 3 Lake Susan Butterfly Garden 4 Lake Ann Rain Gardens 5 Lotus Lake Beach 6 Lotus Pond 7 Minnewashta Manor Biofiltration System 8 Minnewashta Heights Park Raingarden 9 Roundhouse Park Raingardens 10 Kerber Park Raingardens & Pond Buffer 11 Orchard Lane Raingarden 12 Sandpiper Trail Filtration Swale 13 Washta Bay Raingarden 14 Timberwood Estates Filtration Basin 15 Lotus Lake Boat Launch Raingarden 16 Laredo Drive Storm Basin 285 2025 Stormwater BMP Maintenance General Notes: • Herbicides used must be registered with the Minnesota Department of Agriculture. • Herbicides must be applied by a licensed Commercial Pesticide Applicator. • Additional work must be approved by City Water Resources Engineer prior to start of work. 1. Bandimere Park Pond and Raingardens (8800sq.ft, 3500sq.ft, 5000sq.ft) • Spring mow or weed whip to 6” height • 2 herbicide applications (late spring and fall) • 3 site weeding visits ( handweed/ weed whip) • Install additional hardwood mulch to parking lot rain garden • Volunteer woody treatment and removal 2. Filtration Basin Hwy 5 (3500sq.ft) • spring mow or weed whip to 6” height • 2 herbicide applications (late spring and fall) • 3 site weeding visits (hand weed/ weed whip) 3. Lake Susan Butterfly Garden (L. Susan North Shoreline) (4500sq.ft &40,000 sq.ft) • Spring mow or weed whip to 6” height • 2 herbicide applications (late spring and fall) • 3 site weeding visits (hand weed/ weed whip) 4. Lake Ann Rain Gardens (4) (2900sq.ft, 1600sq.ft, 2200sq.ft, 4200sq.ft) • Spring mow or weed whip to 6” height • 2 herbicide applications (late spring and fall) • 3 site weeding visits (hand weed/ weed whip) • Remove turfgrass from within raingarden 286 5. Lotus Lake Beach (5700sq.ft) • Spring mow or weed whip to 6” height • 2 herbicide applications (late Spring and fall) • 3 site weeding visits (hand weed/ weed whip) 6. Lotus Pond (3500sq.ft) • Spring mow or weed whip to 6” height • 2 herbicide applications (late sping and fall) • 3 site weeding visits (hand weed/ weed whip) 7. Minnewashta Manor Biofiltration system (4800sq.ft) • Spring mow or weed whip to 6” height • 2 herbicide applications (late spring and fall) • 3 site weeding visits (handweed/ weed whip) • Remove turfgrass from within raingarden • Volunteer woody treatment and removal 8. Minnewashta Heights Park Raingarden (7500sq.ft) • Spring mow or weed whip to 4” height • 2 herbicide applications (late spring and fall) • 3 site weeding visits (hand weed/ weed whip) • Remove turfgrass from within raingarden 9. Roundhouse Park Raingardens (3) (2100sq.ft, 1600sq.ft, 1700sq.ft) • Spring mow or weed whip to 4” height • 2 herbicide applications (late spring and fall) • 3 site weeding visits (hand weed/ weed whip) • Remove turfgrass from within raingardens 10. Kerber Park Pond Buffer (20,000sq.ft) • Spring mow or weed whip to 4” height • 2 herbicide applications (late spring and fall) • 3 site weeding visits (hand weed/ weed whip) • Volunteer woody treatment and removal 287 11. Orchard Lane Raingarden (2100sq.ft) • Herbicide applications (late spring and fall) • 3 site weeding visits • Volunteer woody treatment and removal 12. Sandpiper Trail Filtration Swale • Herbicide applications (late spring and fall) • 3 site weeding visits • Volunteer woody treatment and removal 13. Washta Bay raingarden • Herbicide applications (late spring and fall) • 3 site weeding visits • Volunteer woody treatment and removal 14. Timberwood Estates Filtration basin • Volunteer woody treatment and removal • Herbicide applications (late spring and fall) • Removal of any growth around rip rap aprons 15. Lotus Lake Boat Launch Raingarden • Vegetation newly planted in 2024, verify/maintain navite plant establishment • 2 site weeding visits • Volunteer woody treatment and removal 16. Loredo Drive Storm Basin • Herbicide applications (late spring and fall) • Removal of volunteer trees from BMP bottom • 800sqft brush removal • Removal of 20 trees, sub 5” diameter (as directed by City staff) • 3 site weeding visits 17. Additional spot treatment as directed by City Staff • Herbicide application as needed • Volunteer woody treatment and removal • Work to be completed as directed by City staff at other sites located in the City of Chanhassen • Assume 50 hours for the quote set up as an allowance 288 18. End of year report • A summary report of the sites maintained the work completed at each site • Include recommendations for future maintenance of the site for the 2026 season 289 Dear Ryan, April 3rd, 2025 Thank you for the opportunity to continue working on the City of Chanhassen native planting sites. Please find below a detailed estimate of our maintenance estimates for each site. All estimates are a not to exceed amount. 2025 Chanhassen Stormwater BMP Maintenance Estimate 1. Bandimere Park Pond and Rain Gardens- $1,950 (8800sq.ft, 3500sq.ft, 5000sq.ft) a. Spring mow or weed whip to 6” height b. 2 herbicide applications (late spring and fall) c. 3 site weeding visits (hand weed/ weed-whip) d. Prevent turf grass from entering rain gardens e. Volunteer woody treatment and removal 2. Filtration Basin Hwy 5 (3500sq.ft) - $517 a. Spring mow or weed whip to 6” height b. 2 herbicide applications (late spring and fall) c. 3 site weeding visits (hand weed/ weed-whip) 3. Lake Susan Butterfly Garden (L. Susan North Shoreline)- $1,575 (4500sq.ft &40,000 sq. ft.) a. Spring mow or weed whip to 6” height b. 2 herbicide applications (late spring and fall) c. 3 site weeding visits (hand weed/ weed-whip) 4. Lake Ann Rain Gardens (4) - $2,115 (2900sq.ft, 1600sq.ft, 2200sq.ft, 4200sq.ft) a. Spring mow or weed whip to 6” height b. 2 herbicide applications (late spring and fall) c. 3 site weeding visits (hand weed/ weed-whip) d. Prevent turf grass from entering rain gardens 5. Lotus Lake Beach (5,700 sq. ft.)- 2,045 a. Spring mow or weed whip to 6” height b. 2 herbicide applications (late spring and fall) c. 3 site weeding visits (hand weed/ weed-whip) 6. Lotus pond (3500sq. ft.)- $1,269 a. Spring mow or weed whip to 6” height b. 2 herbicide applications (late spring and fall) c. 3 site weeding visits (hand weed/ weed-whip) d. Clear/monitor outlet 7. Minnewashta Manor Biofiltration System (4800sq.ft)- $846 290 a. Spring mow or weed whip to 6” height b. 2 herbicide applications (late spring and fall) c. 3 site weeding visits (hand weed/ weed-whip) d. Prevent turf grass from entering rain gardens e. Volunteer woody treatment and removal 8. Minnewashta Heights Park Rain Garden (7500sq.ft)- $564 a. herbicide applications (late spring and fall) b. 3 site weeding visits (hand weed/ weed-whip) c. Prevent turf grass from entering rain gardens 9. Roundhouse Park Rain Gardens (3)- 1,128 (2100sq.ft, 1600sq.ft, 1700sq.ft) a. Spring mow or weed whip to 4” height b. 2 herbicide applications (late spring and fall) c. 3 site weeding visits (hand weed/ weed-whip) d. Prevent turf grass from entering rain gardens 10. Kerber Park Pond Buffer- $2,045 (20,000 sq. ft) a. Spring mow or weed whip to 4” height b. 2 herbicide applications (late spring and fall) c. 3 site weeding visits (hand weed/ weed-whip) d. Volunteer woody treatment and removal 11. Orchard Lane Raingarden (2100 sq. ft.) - $658 a. Herbicide applications (late spring and fall) b. 3 site weeding visits c. Remove turfgrass from within raingarden d. Establish approximately 1,000 sq. ft. of turf grass along raingarden 12. Sandpiper Trail Filtration Swale (2000 sq. ft.)- $564 a. Herbicide applications (late spring and fall) b. 3 site weeding visits c. Volunteer woody treatment and removal 13. Washta Bay raingarden (2000 sq. ft.)- $517 a. Herbicide applications (late spring and fall) b. 3 site weeding visits c. Volunteer woody treatment and removal 14. Timberwood Estates Filtration basin (2800 sq. ft.)- $564 a. Volunteer woody treatment and removal b. Herbicide applications (late spring and fall) c. Removal of any growth around rip rap aprons. 291 15. Lotus Lake Boat Launch Rain Garden- $470 a. Verify establishment of vegetation in basin area b. 2 site weeding visits c. Volunteer woody treatment and removals 16. Loredo Drive Storm Basin- $1,468 a. Spring and fall herbicide treatments of herbaceous non-natives b. Removal of volunteer trees from BMP bottom c. 800 sq. ft. brush removal d. Removal of 20 trees, sub-5” diameter (as directed by City Staff) e. 3 site weeding visits 17. Additional spot treatment as directed by City Staff - $4,700 a. Herbicide application as needed b. Volunteer woody treatment and removal c. Work to be completed as directed by City staff at other sites located in the City of Chanhassen d. Assume 50 hours for the quote set up as an allowance 18. End of the season site assessment report for all sites- $400 a. A summary report of the sites maintained the work completed at each site b. Include recommendations for future maintenance of the site for the 2026 season 2025 Stormwater BMP Maintenance Total: Not to Exceed $23,395 Please call or email me with any question regarding this quote. Thank You, Tracy Lawler Maintenance Coordinator 612-220-4178 tracy@naturalshore.com 292 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item Resolution 2025-XX: Crimson Bay Rd Improvements Assessment Hearing & Award of Construction Contract File No.ENG 23-02 Item No: G.1 Agenda Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution accepting the bids and awarding a construction contract to Northwest Asphalt, Inc. for the Crimson Bay Road Improvement Project." "The Chanhassen City Council further adopts a resolution adopting the assessment roll for the Crimson Bay Road Improvement Project." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY Tonight's actions are: 1. Host a public hearing for the project, known as the 'assessment hearing', which is a requirement of the M.S. 429 special assessment process 2. Consider awarding the construction contract The intersection of Crimson Bay Road and State Highway 5 (Arboretum Boulevard) will be permanently closed and removed due to the future Hwy 5 expansion project. Crimson Bay Road is proposed to be extended north to connect with Dogwood Road and West 78th Street. The project also will add storm, sanitary, and water utilities. The current properties on Crimson Bay Road are on well and septic systems. 293 The project layout is attached to this report. This project is part of the overall Arboretum Area Transportation Plan (AATP) approved in 2020. BACKGROUND Project information is available on the city's projects web page located at: www.chanhassenmn.gov/government/projects/street-projects/crimson-bay-road-project DISCUSSION The project, if awarded, is planned to begin construction in mid-May and take approximately 3 months to complete. A public open house was held on Wednesday, April 23, 2025, in the City Council Chambers at City Hall. Five residents representing three properties were in attendance. Discussions mainly revolved around construction, such as schedule, mail, garbage, and access, along with timing of sewer/water hook up. All attendees were in support of the project and had no disputes. Since the project will be connecting Crimson Bay Road to existing Dogwood Road, an addressing issue is created. The city intends to keep the Crimson Bay Road street name, and therefore the three (3) properties on Dogwood Road south of W 78th Street will need to undergo an address change. Street names are under the jurisdiction of the city, however zip codes (the post office where the property is assigned) is not under city control, but rather solely a function of the USPS. This project results in the three Dogwood Road properties on the north end having an Excelsior post office location after the street name change to Crimson Bay Road while the existing Crimson Bay Road properties will continue to have a Chaska post office location. Staff will be asking the City Council on direction whether or not to request the USPS consider a zip code change or not. BUDGET The project was bid on April 1, 2025. A total of eight (8) bids were received ranging from $1,746,219 to $1,991,233. The low bid is ~27% below the Engineer's Estimate (see attached bid tab). The low bidder (Northwest Asphalt, Inc.) has performed many similar projects for the city in the past with acceptable performance. The total project cost is shown in the following table, which is ~22% under budget. The project is included in our 5-yr Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Fund Budget Post Bid Cost PMP $1,680,000 $1,432,260 Surface Water $140,000 $113,372 Sanitary Sewer $560,000 $351,037 Water $320,000 $214,178 Total $2,700,000 $2,110,847 Due to its tie to the Highway 5 project, the city applied for and received a $710k Local Partnership Project (LPP) Grant from MnDOT and was also granted eligibility to use Municipal State Aid (MSA) 294 funds even though not a formal MSA route. Both the LPP and MSA funds are part of the PMP revenue for the project. The project revenue also includes private property assessments. The assessments are based on 40% of the street costs in addition to the Sanitary Sewer and Watermain extensions, as the benefiting properties are all currently on private well and septic systems. There are five (5) properties identified to receive assessments, all of which are part of the original Crimson Bay Road Plat. Lots 2 - 5 will receive one unit assessment each, while Lot 1 will be charged two units, as there are documented plans to subdivide that property in the very near future, and therefore sewer and water stubs will be provided with the project to support this future subdivision and the possibility to construct another house. The University of MN Arboretum property is not being assessed as they are granting both permanent and temporary easements to support the extension of the street. These easements were negotiated with the University as part of the multiple AATP projects. Easements were needed due to the original Crimson Bay Road plat only dedicating half of the needed street right-of-way. The northern most Crimson Bay Road property owner was a non-willing seller and so the street needed to curve onto Arboretum property. The preliminary assessment amount was $40,815.01 per unit. Due to the favorable bid, the final assessment amount went down by ~27% to $29,697.20 per unit. The nature of this project does not align with the recent flat rate assessment methodology/criteria. A special benefit appraisal was completed specifically for this project and the final assessment amount falls within the range of probable benefit. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends awarding the construction contract and adopting the assessment roll. ATTACHMENTS Resolution - Accept Bids and Award Contract CBR Resolution - Adopt Assessment Roll CBR Project Layout Bid Abstract_4-2-2025 Final Assessment Roll_4-2-2025 295 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: May 5, 2025 RESOLUTION NO:2025-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE CRIMSON BAY ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS,pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Crimson Bay Road Improvement Project, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law, and; WHEREAS,Northwest Asphalt, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder with a total bid amount of $1,746,219.00. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED bythe Chanhassen City Council: 1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Northwest Asphalt, Inc. in the name of the City of Chanhassen for the Crimson Bay Road Improvement Project according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 5th day of May2025. ATTEST: Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 296 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: May 5, 2025 RESOLUTION NO:2025-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE CRIMSON BAY ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS,pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvements proposed as part of the Crimson Bay Road Improvement project. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Chanhassen, Minnesota: 1.Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement a minimum amount of the assessment levied against it. 2.If not paid in full ahead of time, the Assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of fifteen (15)years. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2026, and shall bear interest at the rate equal to the yield on the 7-year Treasury Note on the date the special assessment roll is adopted, plus 1%. This assessment will appear on the first property tax statement for 2026. Interest shall be added to the first installment on the entire assessment from November 23, 2025 until December 31, 2026. To each subsequent installment, when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3.The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the city treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the assessment is paid by November 22, 2025; and the owner may, at any time thereafter, pay to the city treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. If the property owner decides not to prepay the assessment before the date given above, the rate of interest that will apply shall be the rate identified in #2 above per year. 4.The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. 297 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 5th day of May, 2025. ATTEST: Jenny Potter, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 298 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l llllll>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>l l l l l l l l l l l l>>>>>>>CCGUUGPGPFCCCCCPPCDPPPPCCECOCCCCFUFUPUCCCCCCCCEEEEEEEEEEEEECCCCCCCC>>>>GGGGl l l l l lGG G G G G G EEEGCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCGECCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCEEEEEEEGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGEEEEEGGGGGGGOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUCOCOCOC-C C-CC-CC-CC-CC-CC-CC-C C-C C-C C-C C-C C-C C-CSS SSWOOD BARRICADEPAVERSDRIVEWAY9 " C M P CONCRETE SPILLWAYPAVERSDRIVEWAY BLOCK RETAINING WALL (MID-LOW CONDITION) FENCE: WIRE FENCE: WIRE FENCE: WIRE FENCE: WIRE 15" CMPBITUMINOUSDRIVEWAYPAVERSDRIVEWAYE-CE-CE-CE-CE-CE-C18" RCP G-CG-CG-CG-CG-CG-CG-CG-CG-CG-CG-CG-CG-CG-CPLANTS/LANDSCAPINGPOSTS W/ CHA INBLOCKING WALK ING PATH18" CMPPAVERS DRIVEWAY PAVERSDRIVEWAYGRAVEL DRIVE W AY (UNDE R CONST.)CONCRETE DRIVEWAYW/ BLOCK RET. WALLPAVERS DRIVEWAY TEMPORA R Y BITUMIN O U S CUL-DE-S A C A R E A TEMPORA R Y BITUMIN O U S CUL-DE-S A C A R E A BITUMIN O U S ROADWA Y CONCRETE SIDEWALKBI TUM INOU SDR IV EWA Y FENCE: WIRE FENCE: WIRE48" CMPG-C G-C G-C G-C G-C G-C G-C G-C G-CG-CG-CG-CG-CG-C G-C G-C G-C G-C G-C G-C G-ClG-C IS PER MAPS PROVIDED BY XCEL ENERGYG-C IS PER MAPS PROVIDED BY XCEL ENERGYG-CBITUMINOUSROADWAY15" CMPINVERT FOR PIPE COULDN'T BE EASILY LOCATED IN FIELDPPPPPCOCOCOCO>>>>>>>>>>>>24" RCPROCK SLAB RETAINING WALL WITHWOOD STRUCTURE AND SIGNSLARGE CONCRETESTORM OVERFLOWSTRUCTUREXXXUUEDGE OF WATER 2022-11-23AVG. ELEV. =997.8 NAVD8827" RCP27" RCPFENCE:BARBED WIRE21" RCPRIP-RAPSTORM PIPE IS ASSUMED BEND TO FIT STORM EASEMENT.BASED ON THE DIRECTION OF THE PIPE AS IT LEAVES THECATCH BASIN AND EXITS THE FLARED END SECTION.NO EVIDENCE OF BEND ON SURFACE.DRAINAGE SWALEE-DE-D E- D E-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-D E - D E- D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-D E-D E-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-D E-D E-DE-DCCCCCCCCCCMN/FOMN/FOMN/FOMN/FOMN/FOMN/FOMN/FOMN/FOMN/FOMN/FOMN/FOMN/FOMN/FOMN/FOMN/FOMN/FOMN/FOEHC-D C-D 73°23'54"'163°23'54"'XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXH:\CHAN\0C1126763\CAD\C3D\FIGR_126763_Open House Board.dwg 10/22/2024 4:27:34 PMR Crimson Bay Road Improvements City of Chanhassen Proposed Layout October 2024 R FEETSCALE 0 50 100 HORZ. REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF MINN N/A PID: 250080110 DARLENE J HANSON 7750 CRIMSON BAY RD PID: 252610011 ROB M & CALI L OLSON 7700 CRIMSON BAY RD PID: 252610010 MARY M HAGEMAN 7660 CRIMSON BAY RD PID: 252610030 ROSE MARIE & JOHN CHARLES MASTRICOLA 7640 CRIMSON BAY RD PID: 252610040 DEREK GEARMAN7590 DOGWOOD RDPID: 250580030JOE BILLER7580 DOGWOOD RDPID: 250580020BRIAN D GARSHELIS7570 DOGWOOD RDPID: 250580010THE ARBORS HOA N/A PID: 250590230 PAUL GREGORY & MARY S SUMNERS 7620 CRIMSON BAY RD PID: 252610050 MELISSA HERBST SCHIENA N/A PID: 252610070 PROPOSED LIFT STATION TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY MN TH 5W 78TH STREETCRIMSON BAY ROAD PROPOSED ROADWAY PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED DRIVEWAY PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED WATERMAIN > >> l l EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING EASEMENT PROPOSED TEMPORARY EASEMENT LEGEND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS CLOSE HIGHWAY 5 ACCESS PROPOSED FENCEXX PROPOSED RETAINING WALL 299 ABSTRACT OF BIDS* bid amount changed due to found calculation/addition error * bid amount changed due to found calculation/addition errorCRIMSON BAY ROAD IMPROVEMENTSP # 1002‐123CITY OF CHANHASSENBMI PROJECT NO. 0C1.126763BID DATE: 4/1/2025TIME: 10:00 AM12345678ITEM MNDOT APPROX.NO. SPEC NO. ITEM NOTES QUANT. UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNTBASE BID1 2011.601 AS BUILT1 LUMP SUM $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $7,150.00 $7,150.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $3,094.00 $3,094.00 $14,175.00 $14,175.00 3,310.00 $3,310.00 2,600.00 $2,600.00 3,090.00 $3,090.00 3,140.00 $3,140.002 2021.501 MOBILIZATION1 LUMP SUM $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $101,000.00 $101,000.00 $80,000.00 $80,000.00 $77,044.00 $77,044.00 $26,463.50 $26,463.50 80,300.00 $80,300.00 94,510.70 $94,510.70 121,900.00 $121,900.00 150,000.00 $150,000.003 2101.502 GRUBBING52 EACH $300.00 $15,600.00 $198.00 $10,296.00 $200.00 $10,400.00 $199.50 $10,374.00 $197.40 $10,264.80 78.00 $4,056.00 190.00 $9,880.00 196.00 $10,192.00 250.00 $13,000.004 2101.505 GRUBBING3 ACRE $50,000.00 $152,500.00 $3,864.00 $11,785.20 $6,000.00 $18,300.00 $3,905.30 $11,911.17 $3,864.00 $11,785.20 5,560.00 $16,958.00 3,700.00 $11,285.00 3,830.00 $11,681.50 3,890.00 $11,864.505 2102.503 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL (1) 994 LIN FT $3.00 $2,982.00 $2.10 $2,087.40 $2.00 $1,988.00 $0.83 $825.02 $1.58 $1,570.52 0.90 $894.60 2.00 $1,988.00 0.83 $825.02 2.10 $2,087.406 2102.602 PAVEMENT MESSAGE REMOVAL (1) 3 EACH $325.00 $975.00 $158.00 $474.00 $200.00 $600.00 $174.72 $524.16 $210.00 $630.00 185.00 $555.00 150.00 $450.00 175.00 $525.00 158.50 $475.507 2104.502 REMOVE PIPE APRON (1) 2 EACH $350.00 $700.00 $357.00 $714.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $105.04 $210.08 $250.00 $500.00 725.00 $1,450.00 220.00 $440.00 105.00 $210.00 250.00 $500.008 2104.502 REMOVE LIGHT UNIT (1) 3 EACH $750.00 $2,250.00 $510.00 $1,530.00 $2,500.00 $7,500.00 $689.80 $2,069.40 $2,625.00 $7,875.00 2,780.00 $8,340.00 1,500.00 $4,500.00 1,560.00 $4,680.00 844.50 $2,533.509 2104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE (1) 5 EACH $725.00 $3,625.00 $445.00 $2,225.00 $1,000.00 $5,000.00 $367.12 $1,835.60 $1,000.00 $5,000.00 810.00 $4,050.00 490.00 $2,450.00 367.00 $1,835.00 605.00 $3,025.0010 2104.502 REMOVE SIGN (1) 6 EACH $100.00 $600.00 $52.50 $315.00 $200.00 $1,200.00 $41.60 $249.60 $52.50 $315.00 45.00 $270.00 50.00 $300.00 41.60 $249.60 60.00 $360.0011 2104.502 SALVAGE HYDRANT & VALVE 1 EACH $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $595.00 $595.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,890.72 $1,890.72 $658.82 $658.82 2,740.00 $2,740.00 860.00 $860.00 1,890.00 $1,890.00 1,310.00 $1,310.0012 2104.503 REMOVE WATERMAIN (1) 40 LIN FT $20.00 $800.00 $14.60 $584.00 $30.00 $1,200.00 $5.20 $208.00 $10.00 $400.00 22.00 $880.00 37.00 $1,480.00 5.20 $208.00 32.00 $1,280.0013 2104.503 REMOVE PIPE SEWER (STORM) (1) 484 LIN FT $25.00 $12,100.00 $13.40 $6,485.60 $15.00 $7,260.00 $30.42 $14,723.28 $15.00 $7,260.00 16.00 $7,744.00 20.00 $9,680.00 30.40 $14,713.60 14.00$6,776.0014 2104.503 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER (1) 2,686 LIN FT $11.00 $29,546.00 $4.10 $11,012.60 $5.00 $13,430.00 $7.20 $19,339.20 $2.00 $5,372.00 5.50 $14,773.00 3.00 $8,058.00 3.15 $8,460.90 4.00 $10,744.0015 2104.503 REMOVE RETAINING WALL (1) 220 LIN FT $30.00 $6,600.00 $6.50 $1,430.00 $25.00 $5,500.00 $12.88 $2,833.60 $15.00 $3,300.00 11.00 $2,420.00 19.00 $4,180.00 9.10 $2,002.00 13.50 $2,970.0016 2104.503 REMOVE FENCE 909 LIN FT $5.00 $4,545.00 $5.00 $4,545.00 $4.00 $3,636.00 $4.16 $3,781.44 $4.20 $3,817.80 4.50 $4,090.50 5.00 $4,545.00 4.15 $3,772.35 10.00 $9,090.0017 2104.503 REMOVE FORCE MAIN 158 LIN FT $5.00 $790.00 $10.20 $1,611.60 $20.00 $3,160.00 $26.00 $4,108.00 $2.00 $316.00 11.00 $1,738.00 11.00 $1,738.00 26.00 $4,108.00 25.00 $3,950.0018 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 449 SQ YD $50.00 $22,450.00 $10.20 $4,579.80 $10.00 $4,490.00 $9.78 $4,391.22 $10.00 $4,490.00 8.50 $3,816.50 8.00 $3,592.00 12.70 $5,702.30 9.20 $4,130.8019 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 295 SQ YD $35.00 $10,325.00 $5.10 $1,504.50 $8.00 $2,360.00 $8.22 $2,424.90 $10.00 $2,950.00 6.00 $1,770.00 5.50 $1,622.50 11.10 $3,274.50 8.60 $2,537.0020 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (2) 4,739 SQ YD $7.50 $35,542.50 $3.85 $18,245.15 $5.00 $23,695.00 $6.35 $30,092.65 $2.98 $14,122.22 6.00 $28,434.00 8.00 $37,912.00 1.45 $6,871.55 6.30 $29,855.7021 2104.602 SALVAGE MAILBOX 3 EACH $100.00 $300.00 $155.00 $465.00 $200.00 $600.00 $52.00 $156.00 $157.50 $472.50 260.00 $780.00 320.00 $960.00 260.00 $780.00 211.00 $633.0022 2104.603 REMOVE WOODEN BARRIER 25 LIN FT $100.00 $2,500.00 $25.50 $637.50 $30.00 $750.00 $26.38 $659.50 $15.75 $393.75 20.00 $500.00 46.00 $1,150.00 103.00 $2,575.00 150.00 $3,750.0023 2104.618 REMOVE BRICK PAVERS 1,979 SQ FT $7.00 $13,853.00 $6.30 $12,467.70 $8.00 $15,832.00 $2.08 $4,116.32 $5.00 $9,895.00 4.00 $7,916.00 3.00 $5,937.00 6.25 $12,368.75 6.30 $12,467.7024 2104.618 SALVAGE BRICK PAVERS 1,983 SQ FT $7.00 $13,881.00 $6.30 $12,492.90 $10.00 $19,830.00 $3.12 $6,186.96 $12.60 $24,985.80 10.00 $19,830.00 3.00 $5,949.00 6.25 $12,393.75 6.30 $12,492.9025 2106.507 EXCAVATION ‐ COMMON 5,482 CU YD $29.00 $158,978.00 $23.55 $129,101.10 $20.00 $109,640.00 $16.90 $92,645.80 $21.92 $120,165.44 29.00 $158,978.00 15.00 $82,230.00 34.80 $190,773.60 40.00 $219,280.0026 2106.507 EXCAVATION ‐ SUBGRADE 154 CU YD $35.00 $5,390.00 $31.25 $4,812.50 $10.00 $1,540.00 $19.57 $3,013.78 $21.92 $3,375.68 43.00 $6,622.00 23.00 $3,542.00 22.40 $3,449.60 25.00 $3,850.0027 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV) 3,079 CU YD $39.00 $120,081.00 $35.50 $109,304.50 $30.00 $92,370.00 $32.37 $99,667.23 $34.70 $106,841.30 25.00 $76,975.00 33.00 $101,607.00 33.00 $101,607.00 38.90 $119,773.1028 2106.507 COMMON EMBANKMENT (CV) 2,010 CU YD $40.00 $80,400.00 $1.00 $2,010.00 $2.00 $4,020.00 $7.55 $15,175.50 $34.70 $69,747.00 7.50 $15,075.00 13.00 $26,130.00 14.20 $28,542.00 12.00 $24,120.0029 2106.507 STABILIZING AGGREGATE (CV) 155 CU YD $62.00 $9,610.00 $77.60 $12,028.00 $35.00 $5,425.00 $29.08 $4,507.40 $82.05 $12,717.75 78.00 $12,090.00 54.00 $8,370.00 57.20 $8,866.00 60.00$9,300.0030 2112.604 SUBGRADE PREPARATION 4,849 SQ YD $3.50 $16,971.50 $1.00 $4,849.00 $1.00 $4,849.00 $0.84 $4,073.16 $1.00 $4,849.00 1.50 $7,273.50 2.00 $9,698.00 0.49 $2,376.01 7.00 $33,943.0031 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) (4) 16 HOUR $175.00 $2,800.00 $195.00 $3,120.00 $150.00 $2,400.00 $200.19 $3,203.04 $183.75 $2,940.00 205.00 $3,280.00 160.00 $2,560.00 192.00 $3,072.00 160.00 $2,560.0032 2123.610 MACHINE TIME (5) 24 HOUR $850.00 $20,400.00 $400.00 $9,600.00 $200.00 $4,800.00 $642.22 $15,413.28 $1,750.00 $42,000.00 385.00 $9,240.00 370.00 $8,880.00 197.00 $4,728.00 600.00 $14,400.0033 2130.523 WATER10 MGAL $47.00 $470.00 $76.50 $765.00 $100.00 $1,000.00 $45.41 $454.10 $50.00 $500.00 140.00 $1,400.00 75.00 $750.00 58.10 $581.00 63.00 $630.0034 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 (6) 1,540 CY YD $47.00 $72,380.00 $50.45 $77,693.00 $45.00 $69,300.00 $30.17 $46,461.80 $48.71 $75,013.40 52.00 $80,080.00 23.00 $35,420.00 49.80 $76,692.0055.70 $85,778.0035 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) 445 TON $100.00 $44,500.00 $96.50 $42,942.50 $82.00 $36,490.00 $109.55 $48,749.75 $86.10 $38,314.50 91.00 $40,495.00 84.00 $37,380.00 102.00 $45,390.00 86.60 $38,537.0036 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C) 445 TON $100.00 $44,500.00 $86.80 $38,626.00 $80.00 $35,600.00 $93.93 $41,798.85 $83.58 $37,193.10 89.00 $39,605.00 81.00 $36,045.00 86.00$38,270.00 84.10 $37,424.5037 2411.618 PREFABRICATED MODULAR BLOCK WALL (11) 2,133 SQ FT $58.00 $123,714.00 $68.10 $145,257.30 $60.00 $127,980.00 $80.36 $171,407.88 $54.60 $116,461.80 58.00 $123,714.00 70.00 $149,310.00 74.80 $159,548.40 63.30 $135,018.9038 2501.502 15" RC PIPE APRON (19) 2 EACH $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $2,330.00 $4,660.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $2,380.56 $4,761.12 $1,958.97 $3,917.94 2,690.00 $5,380.00 2,200.00 $4,400.00 2,380.00 $4,760.00 2,120.00 $4,240.0039 2502.503 4" PVC PIPE DRAIN (7) 2,702 LIN FT $15.00 $40,530.00 $17.00 $45,934.00 $20.00 $54,040.00 $14.52 $39,233.04 $17.82 $48,149.64 15.00 $40,530.00 11.00 $29,722.00 8.15 $22,021.30 15.00 $40,530.0040 2502.602 4" PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT 4 EACH $350.00 $1,400.00 $320.00 $1,280.00 $300.00 $1,200.00 $670.00 $2,680.00 $351.25 $1,405.00 535.00 $2,140.00 350.00 $1,400.00 598.00 $2,392.00 217.00 $868.0041 2503.503 22" SPAN RC PIPE‐ARCH SEWER CLASS IIA 66 LIN FT $100.00 $6,600.00 $153.00 $10,098.00 $180.00 $11,880.00 $155.22 $10,244.52 $120.43 $7,948.38 145.00 $9,570.00 140.00 $9,240.00 155.00 $10,230.00 160.00 $10,560.0042 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V 114 LIN FT $100.00 $11,400.00 $70.65 $8,054.10 $75.00 $8,550.00 $89.96 $10,255.44 $79.28 $9,037.92 89.00 $10,146.00 92.00 $10,488.00 90.00 $10,260.00 82.00 $9,348.0043 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS V 59 LIN FT $130.00 $7,670.00 $80.25 $4,734.75 $85.00 $5,015.00 $94.90 $5,599.10 $83.37 $4,918.83 125.00 $7,375.00 120.00 $7,080.00 94.90 $5,599.10 87.00$5,133.0044 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER 2 EACH $1,300.00 $2,600.00 $1,012.00 $2,024.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $1,914.64 $3,829.28 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 3,490.00 $6,980.00 750.00 $1,500.00 1,910.00 $3,820.00 2,100.00 $4,200.0045 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING FORCE MAIN (16) 1 EACH $1,300.00 $1,300.00 $1,812.00 $1,812.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $3,206.32 $3,206.32 $3,118.83 $3,118.83 2,640.00 $2,640.00 1,300.00 $1,300.00 3,210.00 $3,210.00 3,250.00 $3,250.0046 2503.603 8"X6" PVC WYE6 EACH $1,900.00 $11,400.00 $590.00 $3,540.00 $750.00 $4,500.00 $801.84 $4,811.04 $678.22 $4,069.32 1,150.00 $6,900.00 1,000.00 $6,000.00 802.00 $4,812.00 1,010.00 $6,060.0047 2503.603 8" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 402 LIN FT $85.00 $34,170.00 $61.00 $24,522.00 $75.00 $30,150.00 $92.56 $37,209.12 $67.90 $27,295.80 125.00 $50,250.00 71.00 $28,542.00 92.60 $37,225.20 60.00 $24,120.0048 2503.603 8" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 26 395 LIN FT $175.00 $69,125.00 $96.00 $37,920.00 $100.00 $39,500.00 $135.20 $53,404.00 $84.81 $33,499.95 210.00 $82,950.00 220.00 $86,900.00 135.00 $53,325.00 85.00 $33,575.0049 2503.603 6" PVC SANITARY SERVICE PIPE 322 LIN FT $80.00 $25,760.00 $45.50 $14,651.00 $65.00 $20,930.00 $92.04 $29,636.88 $35.97 $11,582.34 62.00 $19,964.00 70.00 $22,540.00 92.00 $29,624.0048.00 $15,456.0050 2503.603 2.0" HDPE FORCEMAIN (3) 345 LIN FT $85.00 $29,325.00 $39.10 $13,489.50 $60.00 $20,700.00 $41.60 $14,352.00 $49.45 $17,060.25 54.00 $18,630.00 30.00 $10,350.00 41.60 $14,352.0039.00 $13,455.0051 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN 1 EACH $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $1,775.00 $1,775.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,278.32 $10,278.32 $2,899.05 $2,899.05 2,920.00 $2,920.00 1,700.00 $1,700.00 10,300.00 $10,300.00 4,180.00 $4,180.0052 2504.602 HYDRANT (20) 3 EACH $7,600.00 $22,800.00 $7,710.00 $23,130.00 $6,500.00 $19,500.00 $9,184.24 $27,552.72 $7,194.40 $21,583.20 8,460.00 $25,380.00 8,000.00 $24,000.00 9,180.00 $27,540.00 6,990.00 $20,970.0053 2504.602 INSTALL HYDRANT & VALVE (20) 1 EACH $6,600.00 $6,600.00 $1,775.00 $1,775.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $3,150.16 $3,150.16 $2,095.25 $2,095.25 2,330.00 $2,330.00 2,500.00 $2,500.00 3,460.00 $3,460.00 2,410.00 $2,410.0054 2504.602 1" CORPORATION STOP 7 EACH $725.00 $5,075.00 $330.00 $2,310.00 $700.00 $4,900.00 $946.40 $6,624.80 $399.20 $2,794.40 1,200.00 $8,400.00 1,300.00 $9,100.00 946.00 $6,622.00 696.00 $4,872.0055 2504.602 6" GATE VALVE & BOX (20) 3 EACH $2,800.00 $8,400.00 $2,910.00 $8,730.00 $3,500.00 $10,500.00 $3,372.21 $10,116.63 $2,746.55 $8,239.65 3,640.00 $10,920.00 3,600.00 $10,800.00 3,030.00 $9,090.00 2,860.00 $8,580.0056 2504.602 8" GATE VALVE & BOX (20) 2 EACH $4,500.00 $9,000.00 $3,870.00 $7,740.00 $4,500.00 $9,000.00 $4,227.35 $8,454.70 $3,627.83 $7,255.66 4,600.00 $9,200.00 4,700.00$9,400.00 3,880.00 $7,760.00 6,700.00 $13,400.0057 2504.602 12" GATE VALVE & BOX (20) 1 EACH $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,160.00 $6,160.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $6,617.00 $6,617.00 $5,962.20 $5,962.20 9,330.00 $9,330.00 7,600.00$7,600.00 6,270.00 $6,270.00 6,520.00 $6,520.0058 2504.602 1" CURB STOP & BOX (18) 7 EACH $950.00 $6,650.00 $590.00 $4,130.00 $700.00 $4,900.00 $1,170.26 $8,191.82 $812.97 $5,690.79 1,440.00 $10,080.00 1,700.00 $11,900.00 1,200.00 $8,400.00 901.00 $6,307.0059 2504.603 1" TYPE PE PIPE 255 LIN FT $50.00 $12,750.00 $26.00 $6,630.00 $45.00 $11,475.00 $17.94 $4,574.70 $28.43 $7,249.65 47.00 $11,985.00 28.00 $7,140.00 17.90 $4,564.50 37.00$9,435.0060 2504.603 6" PVC WATERMAIN C900 DR 18 39 LIN FT $90.00 $3,510.00 $55.40 $2,160.60 $62.00 $2,418.00 $44.51 $1,735.89 $55.01 $2,145.39 55.00 $2,145.00 82.00 $3,198.00 44.50 $1,735.50 52.00 $2,028.0061 2504.603 8" PVC WATERMAIN C900 DR 18 1,284 LIN FT $95.00 $121,980.00 $51.10 $65,612.40 $65.00 $83,460.00 $59.80 $76,783.20 $60.30 $77,425.20 64.00 $82,176.00 71.00 $91,164.00 59.80 $76,783.20 58.00 $74,472.0062 2504.603 12" PVC WATERMAIN C900 DR 18 110 LIN FT $95.00 $10,450.00 $82.40 $9,064.00 $90.00 $9,900.00 $115.70 $12,727.00 $85.63 $9,419.30 165.00 $18,150.00 100.00 $11,000.00 116.00 $12,760.00 92.00 $10,120.00Minger Construction Co. Inc. Meyer Contracting, Inc.Bolton & Menk, Inc. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. Ryan Contracting Co. Valley Paving, Inc. Northdale Construction Company, Inc.Park Construction Company R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc.300 63 2504.604 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION 11 SQ YD $80.00 $880.00 $64.10 $705.10 $60.00 $660.00 $79.82 $878.02 $62.47 $687.17 57.00 $627.00 82.00 $902.00 79.80 $877.80 49.00 $539.0064 2504.608 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS (17) 1,671 POUND $18.00 $30,078.00 $16.10 $26,903.10 $10.00 $16,710.00 $14.56 $24,329.76 $17.31 $28,925.01 20.00 $33,420.00 24.00 $40,104.00 14.60 $24,396.60 16.00 $26,736.0065 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY 15 EACH $1,000.00 $15,000.00 $1,097.00 $16,455.00 $1,000.00 $15,000.00 $848.34 $12,725.10 $1,439.63 $21,594.45 1,460.00 $21,900.00 1,000.00 $15,000.00 1,120.00 $16,800.00 912.00 $13,680.0066 2506.503 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48‐4020 15 LIN FT $1,000.00 $15,400.00 $446.50 $6,876.10 $370.00 $5,698.00 $474.24 $7,303.30 $341.67 $5,261.72 455.00 $7,007.00 610.00 $9,394.00 474.00 $7,299.60 476.00 $7,330.4067 2506.603 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 1 (12) 12 LIN FT $650.00 $7,800.00 $609.00 $7,308.00 $400.00 $4,800.00 $443.04 $5,316.48 $491.66 $5,899.92 435.00 $5,220.00 690.00 $8,280.00 443.00 $5,316.00595.00 $7,140.0068 2506.603 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 2 (8) (13) 17 LIN FT $900.00 $14,940.00 $772.50 $12,823.50 $500.00 $8,300.00 $616.72 $10,237.55 $616.45 $10,233.07 630.00 $10,458.00 950.00 $15,770.00 617.00 $10,242.20 767.00 $12,732.2069 2506.603 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPECIAL 3 (8) (14) 19 LIN FT $900.00 $16,650.00 $990.00 $18,315.00 $1,000.00 $18,500.00 $1,267.76 $23,453.56 $1,511.08 $27,954.98 1,950.00 $36,075.00 2,000.00 $37,000.00 1,270.00 $23,495.00 1,790.00 $33,115.0070 2506.603 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE (SAN) 61 LIN FT $1,500.00 $90,900.00 $432.50 $26,209.50 $400.00 $24,240.00 $691.58 $41,909.75 $482.95 $29,266.77 535.00 $32,421.00 600.00 $36,360.00 692.00$41,935.20 487.00 $29,512.2071 2506.601 CONSTRUCT LIFT STATION 1 LUMP SUM $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $144,200.00 $144,200.00 $170,000.00 $170,000.00 $193,214.28 $193,214.28 $219,042.05 $219,042.05 185,000.00 $185,000.00 198,200.00 $198,200.00 172,300.00 $172,300.00 163,000.00 $163,000.0072 2506.602 EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL (SAN) 5 EACH $325.00 $1,625.00 $190.00 $950.00 $300.00 $1,500.00 $416.61 $2,083.05 $417.03 $2,085.15 275.00 $1,375.00 370.00 $1,850.00 290.00 $1,450.00 250.00 $1,250.0073 2511.507 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III 18 CU YD $225.00 $4,050.00 $154.00 $2,772.00 $85.00 $1,530.00 $220.48 $3,968.64 $169.90 $3,058.20 115.00 $2,070.00 250.00 $4,500.00 220.00 $3,960.00 140.00 $2,520.0074 2521.618 4" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY (9) 255 SQ FT $8.00 $2,040.00 $13.65 $3,480.75 $20.00 $5,100.00 $9.69 $2,470.95 $17.89 $4,561.95 21.00 $5,355.00 20.00 $5,100.00 10.60 $2,703.00 20.00 $5,100.0075 2531.504 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT (9) 146 SQ YD $165.00 $24,090.00 $99.10 $14,468.60 $100.00 $14,600.00 $105.24 $15,365.04 $77.58 $11,326.68 100.00 $14,600.00 92.00 $13,432.00 67.00 $9,782.00 73.00 $10,658.0076 2531.603 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN SURMOUNTABLE 2,811 LIN FT $20.00 $56,220.00 $21.00 $59,031.00 $24.00 $67,464.00 $19.71 $55,404.81 $18.11 $50,907.21 21.00 $59,031.00 20.00 $56,220.00 18.20 $51,160.2018.20 $51,160.2077 2540.602 INSTALL MAILBOX 3 EACH $175.00 $525.00 $204.00 $612.00 $500.00 $1,500.00 $78.00 $234.00 $315.00 $945.00 355.00 $1,065.00 320.00 $960.00 260.00 $780.00 317.00 $951.0078 2540.618 INSTALL BRICK PAVER (15) 1,983 SQ FT $15.00 $29,745.00 $15.25 $30,240.75 $20.00 $39,660.00 $18.95 $37,577.85 $19.99 $39,640.17 20.00 $39,660.00 21.00 $41,643.00 15.10 $29,943.3018.00 $35,694.0079 2557.502 VEHICULAR GATE‐SPECIAL 1 EACH $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $1,785.00 $1,785.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,768.00 $1,768.00 $1,785.00 $1,785.00 1,890.00 $1,890.00 1,500.00$1,500.00 1,770.00 $1,770.00 1,790.00 $1,790.0080 2557.603 WOVEN WIRE FENCE 863 LIN FT $55.00 $47,465.00 $52.50 $45,307.50 $50.00 $43,150.00 $52.00 $44,876.00 $52.50 $45,307.50 56.00 $48,328.00 43.00 $37,109.00 52.00 $44,876.0053.00 $45,739.0081 2557.603 ORNAMENTAL FENCE DESIGN SPECIAL 223 LIN FT $180.00 $40,140.00 $237.00 $52,851.00 $320.00 $71,360.00 $235.04 $52,413.92 $237.30 $52,917.90 250.00 $55,750.00 230.00 $51,290.00 235.00 $52,405.00 240.00 $53,520.0082 2557.603 TEMPORARY WOVEN WIRE FENCE 863 LIN FT $20.00 $17,260.00 $10.50 $9,061.50 $12.00 $10,356.00 $10.40 $8,975.20 $10.50 $9,061.50 11.00 $9,493.00 48.00 $41,424.00 10.40 $8,975.20 11.00$9,493.0083 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LUMP SUM $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $2,047.00 $2,047.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $3,640.00 $3,640.00 $3,675.00 $3,675.00 3,890.00 $3,890.00 8,000.00 $8,000.00 3,640.00 $3,640.00 3,500.00 $3,500.0084 2564.518 SIGN PANELS TYPE C24SQ FT $65.00 $1,560.00 $94.50 $2,268.00 $100.00 $2,400.00 $119.60 $2,870.40 $105.00 $2,520.00 130.00 $3,120.00 90.00 $2,160.00 120.00 $2,880.00 95.00 $2,280.0085 2571.502 DECIDUOUS TREE 2.5" CAL B&B 5 EACH $750.00 $3,750.00 $625.00 $3,125.00 $800.00 $4,000.00 $618.80 $3,094.00 $703.50 $3,517.50 745.00 $3,725.00 690.00 $3,450.00 1,090.00 $5,450.00 840.00 $4,200.0086 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT 1 LUMP SUM $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $2,040.00 $2,040.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $4,111.20 $4,111.20 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 0.01 $0.01 1,000.00 $1,000.00 0.01 $0.01 3,590.00 $3,590.0087 2573.501 EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR 1 LUMP SUM $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $510.00 $510.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,705.00 $2,705.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 2,970.00 $2,970.00 15,000.00 $15,000.00 2,680.00 $2,680.00 1,500.00 $1,500.0088 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION 11 EACH $250.00 $2,750.00 $306.00 $3,366.00 $150.00 $1,650.00 $126.61 $1,392.71 $250.00 $2,750.00 225.00 $2,475.00 270.00 $2,970.00 87.80 $965.80 202.00 $2,222.0089 2573.503 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS 2,978 LIN FT $2.50 $7,445.00 $3.10 $9,231.80 $2.10 $6,253.80 $2.23 $6,640.94 $2.21 $6,581.38 2.50 $7,445.00 3.50 $10,423.00 2.25 $6,700.50 2.20 $6,551.6090 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER (4) 380 LIN FT $3.75 $1,425.00 $4.10 $1,558.00 $2.75 $1,045.00 $2.92 $1,109.60 $2.89 $1,098.20 3.00 $1,140.00 4.50 $1,710.00 2.90 $1,102.00 3.00 $1,140.0091 2573.602 ROCK DITCH CHECK (4) 10 EACH $450.00 $4,500.00 $153.00 $1,530.00 $250.00 $2,500.00 $364.00 $3,640.00 $367.50 $3,675.00 405.00 $4,050.00 860.00 $8,600.00 762.00 $7,620.00 370.00 $3,700.0092 2574.505 SOIL BED PREPARATION 2 ACRE $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $1,020.00 $2,040.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $504.09 $1,008.18 $498.75 $997.50 530.00 $1,060.00 480.00 $960.00 504.00 $1,008.00 501.00 $1,002.0093 2574.507 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW (CV) 1,396 CU YD $38.00 $53,048.00 $64.15 $89,553.40 $40.00 $55,840.00 $0.01 $13.96 $38.34 $53,522.64 5.00 $6,980.00 30.00 $41,880.00 55.10 $76,919.60 43.00 $60,028.0094 2574.508 FERTILIZER TYPE 3 389 POUND $1.25 $486.25 $0.80 $311.20 $1.00 $389.00 $0.75 $291.75 $0.75 $291.75 0.80 $311.20 0.70 $272.30 0.75 $291.75 0.80 $311.2095 2575.504 SODDING TYPE LAWN 756 SQ YD $30.00 $22,680.00 $9.50 $7,182.00 $9.00 $6,804.00 $9.50 $7,182.00 $9.40 $7,106.40 10.00 $7,560.00 12.00 $9,072.00 9.50 $7,182.00 10.00 $7,560.0096 2575.504 ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 20 1,390 SQ YD $2.75 $3,822.50 $1.85 $2,571.50 $2.00 $2,780.00 $1.86 $2,585.40 $1.84 $2,557.60 2.00 $2,780.00 2.00 $2,780.00 1.85 $2,571.50 1.90 $2,641.0097 2575.508 HYDRAULIC BONDED FIBER MATRIX 5,795 POUND $2.00 $11,590.00 $1.00 $5,795.00 $1.00 $5,795.00 $0.90 $5,215.50 $0.89 $5,157.55 0.95 $5,505.25 0.90 $5,215.50 0.90 $5,215.50 0.90 $5,215.5098 2575.523 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 3 12 MGAL $900.00 $10,800.00 $520.00 $6,240.00 $500.00 $6,000.00 $525.31 $6,303.72 $519.75 $6,237.00 550.00 $6,600.00 500.00 $6,000.00 525.00 $6,300.00 522.00 $6,264.0099 2575.605 SEEDING2 ACRE $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $499.00 $998.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $504.09 $1,008.18 $498.75 $997.50 530.00 $1,060.00 13,600.00 $27,200.00 504.00 $1,008.00 501.00 $1,002.00100 2575.608 SEED TURFGRASS 389 POUND $5.00 $1,945.00 $4.50 $1,750.50 $5.00 $1,945.00 $4.46 $1,734.94 $4.41 $1,715.49 4.50 $1,750.50 4.00 $1,556.00 4.45 $1,731.05 4.40 $1,711.60101 2575.601 LANDSCAPE ALLOWANCE 1 LUMP SUM $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 10,000.00 $10,000.00 10,000.00 $10,000.00102 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE MULI COMP GR IN (WR) 540 LIN FT $4.00 $2,160.00 $3.40 $1,836.00 $2.10 $1,134.00 $3.33 $1,798.20 $3.36 $1,814.40 3.50 $1,890.00 3.00 $1,620.00 3.35 $1,809.00 3.40 $1,836.00103 2582.503 6" SOLID LINE MULTI COMP GR IN (WR) 640 LIN FT $4.00 $2,560.00 $6.30 $4,032.00 $2.80 $1,792.00 $6.24 $3,993.60 $6.30 $4,032.00 6.50 $4,160.00 6.00 $3,840.00 6.25 $4,000.00 6.30 $4,032.00104 2582.503 24" SOLID LINE MULTI COMP GR IN (WR) 100 LIN FT $30.00 $3,000.00 $16.00 $1,600.00 $15.00 $1,500.00 $15.81 $1,581.00 $15.96 $1,596.00 17.00 $1,700.00 15.00 $1,500.00 15.80 $1,580.00 16.10 $1,610.00BASE BID TOTAL BID: $2,397,483.75 $1,746,219.00 $1,759,618.80 $1,762,074.72 $1,813,700.13 $1,899,831.06 $1,908,200.00 $1,936,242.04 $1,991,233.40 301 TOTALPROP. PROPERTY ASSMT STREET ASSMT UTILITY ASSMT NOTESNO. ADDRESS UNIT ASSMT UNIT ASSMT1PAUL GREGORY & MARY SUMMERS7620 CRIMSON BAY RD 252610050 1 $11,904.76 1 $17,792.44 $29,697.202 JOHN & ROSE MASTRICOLA 7640 CRIMSON BAY RD 2526100401 $11,904.76 1 $17,792.44 $29,697.203 MARY HAGEMAN 7660 CRIMSON BAY RD 252610030 1 $11,904.76 1 $17,792.44 $29,697.204 ROB & CALI OLSON 7700 CRIMSON BAY RD 252610010 1 $11,904.76 1 $17,792.44 $29,697.205 DARLENE HANSON 7750 CRIMSION BAY RD 252610011 2 $23,809.52 2 $35,584.88 $59,394.406 REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF MINN 250080110 15 $178,571.43 15 $266,886.59 $445,458.02UMN WILL NOT BE ASSESSED, CITY WILL COVER THESE COSTSAssessment Basis Unit 21 $250,000.00 21 $373,641.23 $623,641.23CRIMSON BAY ROAD IMPROVEMENTSFINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL4/1/2025OWNER P.I.D.STREET ASSESSMENT UTILITY ASSESSMENT 302 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item Consider Preliminary Plat, Site Plan, Rezoning, and Land Disturbance and Tree Removal Contract for Pioneer Ridge Development (Planning Case 25-01) File No.25-01 Item No: H.1 Agenda Section GENERAL BUSINESS Prepared By Eric Maass, Community Development Director Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the rezoning, preliminary plat, and site plan for a townhome development consisting of 40 attached townhomes and 14 detached townhomes, subject to the conditions outlined in the staff report dated April 23, 2024, and approval of the Land Disturbance and Tree Removal Contract for Pioneer Ridge Development." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY The city is asked to consider rezoning property and preliminary plat and site plan approval for a townhome development consisting of 40 attached townhomes and 14 detached townhomes on an 11.75- acre property generally located at the intersection of Bluff Creek Drive and Pioneer Trail. BACKGROUND The Planning Commission considered this application and held a public hearing at their meeting on February 18, 2025. At the time of the February 18 Planning Commission meeting, the proposed development consisted of 60 attached townhomes. Since that meeting, the applicant has modified the development proposal to consist of 40 attached townhomes and 14 detached townhomes based on additional feedback during the public hearing, as well as from the City Council. 303 In addition to the rezoning, preliminary plat, and site plan portions of the case, staff has included a Land Disturbance and Tree Clearing contract for City Council consideration. This is being added so that some tree clearing can be completed on-site prior to considering a final plat approval. The applicant is requesting to remove trees that would be restricted for removal later in the summer based on protections associated with the northern long-eared bat. The City Council approved a similar contract with the Pleasant View Pointe development earlier this year. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested rezoning, preliminary plat, and site plan approval for the Pioneer Ridge subdivision. ATTACHMENTS Complete Civil Plan Set Rendering of Jasmine and Isla Attached Townhomes Rendering of Sophia and Amelia Townhomes City Staff Report - All Departments Findings of Fact and Decision Land Disturbance and Tree Removal Contract February 18, 2025 Planning Commission meeting minutes with public comment emails 304 57.2857.2857.2867.6955.2555.2555.2555.2555.2555.2555.2555.2555.25 5 5 . 2 5 N:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-CV01.DWG PIONEER RIDGE © 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.SHEET INDEXPRELIMINARY PLANSPIONEER RIDGECHANHASSEN, MINNESOTAPREPARED FOR:PIONEER RIDGE, LLC.221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337CONTACT: CHRISTOPHER CONTRERASPHONE: 952-898-0230EMAIL: CCONTRERAS@BRANDLANDERSON.COMSITEVicinity Map(NOT TO SCALE)SHEETSREVISIONDATENO.102/05/2025REVISED SITE PLANALL204/07/2025REVISED SITE PLANALL304/21/2025REVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE4..............FORFORPLAT, SITE, GRADING, EROSIONCONTROL, UTILITIES, LANDSCAPEAND TREE PRESERVATIONPREPARED BY:PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00CONTACT: RYAN BLUHMPhone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPIONEER RIDGECHANHASSEN, MINNESOTAFORFORPLAT, SITE, GRADING, EROSIONCONTROL, UTILITIES, LANDSCAPEAND TREE PRESERVATIONINITIAL SUBMITTAL DATE: 12/13/24SHEET: 1 OF 22PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00Sheet List TableSHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLE1Cover2Existing Conditions3Preliminary Plat4Preliminary Grading Plan5Preliminary Utility Plan6Street Profiles7Details8Details9Details10Details11Details12Details13Details14Details15Overall Tree Preservation16Preliminary Tree Preservation Plan17Preliminary Tree Preservation Plan18Preliminary Tree Preservation Data19Overall Preliminary Landscape Plan20PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN & NOTES21PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN & DETAILS22PHOTOMETRIC PLAN305 93093093 0 930930930 930 930930932932 934928920920920920920 920920920918922920 920920 928926922 9 2 8 9 3 2 9349369 3 8 9409 4 6 944930930920910900890900920 910900 936 948∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆ ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆SSXXPOH POH POH POH POH POH POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHSTOSTOSANSANSANSANSANSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STOSTOWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATSTOPOH POH POH POH POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHSTO STOHH FIBER OPTICFOFOFD. 1/2 INCHOPEN IRON PIPEFD. 1/2 INCH OPENLS #12294FD. 2 INCH MNDT DISCR/W BOUNDARY CORNER B6FD. 1/2 INCH OPENLS #12294FD. 1/2 INCH OPENLS #12294FD. 1/2 INCH OPENLS #12294FD. 1/2 INCHOPEN IRON PIPER/W BOUNDARYCORNER B8FD. 1/2 INCH OPENLS #12294FD. 1/2 INCH OPENLS #12294FD. 1/2 INCH OPENLS #12043R/W BOUNDARY CORNER B9FD. 1/2 INCH OPEN IRON PIPER/W BOUNDARY CORNER B10FD. 1/2 INCH OPEN IRON PIPE;BROKEN CAPR/W BOUNDARY CORNER B11FD. 1/2 INCH OPEN IRON PIPE;BROKEN CAPR/W BOUNDARY CORNER B12P.O.B. LINE 1FD. 2 INCH MNDT DISCR/W BOUNDARY CORNER B13PER MNDT R/W PLAT NO. 10-20E 1/4 COR OF SEC. 27, TWP. 116, RGE. 23 &W 1/4 COR OF SEC. 26, TWP. 116, RGE. 23FD. 4 INCH DISCS. LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OFTHE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 27E. LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OFTHE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 27W. LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OFTHE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 28S. LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OFTHE NW1/4 OF SEC. 28NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARYPER MNDT R/W PLAT NO. 10-20FD. REBAR W/CAPR/W BOUNDARYCORNER B7R/W BOUNDARYCORNER B5LINE 1LINE 1BRICK FIREPITBRICK FIREPITBRICK FIREPITBRICK FIREPITGARDEN AREASWINGSETGARDEN AREAAPPROXIMATEMOW LINEAPPROXIMATEMOW LINEPONDGARDEN AREARE=929.30CAN'T OPENRE=924.43IE=919.73 (E)IE=913.03 (W)RE=924.39IE=920.09 (E)IE=920.29 (NE)RE=900.85IE=896.15 (NE)IE=896.15 (SE)RE=901.83IE=896.43 (SW)RE=899.85IE=895.55 (NW)IE=895.45 (NE)IE=895.45 (SE)RE=903.48IE=900.28 (NW)IE=899.98 (SW)IE=900.28 (NE)RE=904.73IE=899.33 (SE)RE=906.09IE=902.79 (NE)IE=902.79 (SW)RE=910.08IE=906.78 (NE)IE=906.78 (SW)RE=916.64IE=913.24 (SW)RE=908.74RE=909.92RE=923.28IE=919.1824" RCP20" RCP15" RCP12" RCP15" RCP12" RCP 12" RCP 12" RCP12" RCP12" RCP12" RCPPID: 256090450CITY OF CHANHASSENPID: 256090410DEEPAKAGGARWALPID: 256090400REBECCAARMAGOSTPID: 256090390ANDERSSYVERSONPID: 256090380MATTHEWSEVERANCEPID: 256090370DANIEL &NANCY GILMOREPID: 256090360AARON &JENNIFER PIERCEPID: 256090350MATTHEW &HOLLY WILDEPID: 256090340LESLIE & DANAELDERPID: 256090330GLEN & NATANIASCHOENBERGPID: 256090320NATHAN &LINDSEY BUTTONPID: 256090310JOSEPH &JENNIFER FELIUPID: 256090300RUSSELL &MEGHANHOLMESPID: 256090290JOHN &CATHERINESANTINIPID: 256090280KORY & SARAHGROSKREUTZPID: 256090270THOMAS & CASSANDRA KRAUSPID: 253620025CITY OF CHANHASSENPID: 256090460CITY OF CHANHASSENBLUFF CREEK DRIVE(PUBLIC STREET)PIONEER TRAIL(PUBLIC STREET)WIDTH VARIES US H I G H W A Y 2 1 2 (P U B L I C S T R E E T ) WI D T H V A R I E S80R/WCONTROLLED ACCESS SHOWNPER MNDT R/W PLAT NO. 10-2010 FT BITUMINOUSTRAIL 5 FT CONCRETESIDEWALKCONTROLLED ACCESS SHOWNPER MNDT R/W PLAT NO. 10-20N. LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4OF SEC. 28, TWP. 116, RGE. 23CONTROLLED ACCESS PERDEED RESTRICTION12" RCP 15" RCP24" RCPCB=S20°54'41"ECH=323.84∆=079°17'21"R=253.78L=351.20N51°07'03.00"E 253.88 N69°27'12.00"E 464.59 N08°53'48. 0 0 " E 1 7 1 . 8 4 N5 2 ° 5 4 ' 3 3 . 0 0 " E 1 2 6 . 6 3 N00°26'14.75"W 253.73 N00°26'14.75"W 263.81 S80°01'29.00"E 353.71N68°45'55 .00"E 230 .69 S3 0 ° 3 6 ' 5 2 . 0 0 " W 4 3 5 . 0 9 S22 ° 5 7 ' 1 7 . 0 0 " W 1 7 3 . 0 7S87°24'40.00"W 336.72∆=037°35'13"R=852.85L=559.48S46°00'03.00"W 190.46 S88°36'33.09"E66.03N00°26'46.48"W 530.77 N 3 8 ° 0 8 ' 5 3 . 0 0 " E 8 9 0 . 9 3 ∆R/W BOUNDARY CORNER B14PER MNDT R/W PLAT NO. 10/20N:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-EXP01.DWG 222CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04/21/2025RMBRMBEJKPIONEER RIDGEEXISTING CONDITIONS221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337PIONEER RIDGE12/13/24MATT WELINSKI5359604/21/2025PIONEER RIDGE, LLC.PRELIMINARY PLANS© 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com0'801602401" = 80'###### or ##02/05/202504/07/202504/21/2025..REVISED SITE PLANREVISED SITE PLANREVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE..PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTAPROPERTY DESCRIPTIONThe following information was provided by Land Title, Inc., Issuing Agent for First American Title Insurance Company, File Number6872387, which has an effective date of October 25, 2023 at 7:00 am:That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 27, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, and the SouthwestQuarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, shown as Parcel 60 on Minnesota Departmentof Transportation Right of Way Plat Numbered 10-20 and Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-43 asthe same is on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Carver County, Minnesota;Which lies northwesterly, northerly and northeasterly, of Line 1 described below:Line 1:Commencing at Right of Way Boundary Corner B14 as shown on said Plat No. 10-20; thence southwesterly on an azimuth of 218degrees 08 minutes 53 seconds along the boundary of said plat for 890.93 feet to Right of Way Boundary Corner B13 and the point ofbeginning of Line 1 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 210 degrees 36 minutes 52 seconds for 435.09 feet; thence on anazimuth of 202 degrees 57 minutes 17 seconds for 173.07 feet; thence on an azimuth of 267 degrees 24 minutes 40 seconds for336.72 feet; thence deflect to the left on a tangential curve, having a radius of 852.85 feet and a delta angle of 37 degrees 35 minutes13 seconds for 559.48 feet; thence on an azimuth of 226 degrees 00 minutes 03 seconds for 190.46 feet; thence northwesterly for351.20 feet on a non-tangential curve, concave to the northeast, having a radius of 253.78 feet, a delta angle of 79 degrees 17minutes 25 seconds and a chord azimuth of 339 degrees 05 minutes 19 seconds to the northwest boundary of said Plat No. 10-20and there terminating.Subject to the following restriction:No access shall be permitted to Trunk Highway No 212 from the lands herein conveyed.Abstract PropertyGENERAL NOTES1.Bearings of property lines shown hereon are based on the Carver County coordinate system, (NAD 83 - 2011 ControlAdjustment).2.Lengths of lines and distances between features are measured in US-Survey Feet.LEGENDGUY WIREFLARED END SECTIONBEEHIVE CATCH BASINCATCH BASINPOWER POLESIGNSTREET LIGHTSTEEL/WOOD POSTPOWER OVERHEADWATERMAINSTORM SEWERHYDRANTFENCE LINECONTROLLED ACCESSCURB & GUTTERCONCRETE SURFACEBITUMINOUS SURFACEFOUND MONUMENT (SEE LABEL)TREE LINEPOHSTOWAT∆XEASEMENT LINESECTION LINELOT LINEBOUNDARY LINERIGHT-OF-WAY LINETRAFFIC SIGNAL306 12345678910111213141516171812345678910111213141516171819202121123100.0'165.9'50.0'14' 13'123456789101112131457.28 57.28 57.2867.6955.2555.2555.2555.2555.2555.2555.2555.2555.2555.25 19202,368 sf2,368 sf2,886 sf2,738 sf2,738 sf2,368 sf2,368 sf2,738 sf2,738 sf2,368 sf2,368 sf2,368 sf2,738 sf2,738 sf2,368 sf2,738 sf2,368 sf2,368 sf2,738 sf2,738 sf2,368 sf2,738 sf2,368 sf2,738 sf2,368 sf2,368 sf2,738 sf2,738 sf2,368 sf2,738 sf2,368 sf2,738 sf2,368 sf2,368 sf2,738 sf2,738 sf51,872 sf15,105 sf6,244 sf6,244 sf6,244 sf2,738 sf2,368 sf2,368 sf2,738 sf3732323974 3932323774 74 74 74 37323237743732323774 74 74 74373232323774 373232323774 74 74 74 743732377437323774 74 74 199057 57 57 5737323237743732323774747474373232377437323237747474743732323774373232377474747437323237743732323774 74 74 74 37 32 32 3774 37 32 32 37 747474557190 4 0238 3732323774373232377429940122 61 62 9 1 2 7 7923125 5 173 10957 57 57 1091095461616161616244747474R50'R50'OUTLOT A9,555 sf37 11517134140132124120119122127136139 10 3 15 5714337312062311877732067487,910 sf8,174 sf7,910 sf7,598 sf7,665 sf7,150 sf6,906 sf6,860 sf7,011 sf7,362 sf57,133 sf6754545454545454545454 10920 6737 75,591 sf18 0 119 327140 3492OUTLOT B OUTLOT BOUTLOT B OUTLOT C1710 9 2 3874741132 2823 24 90,097 sf17,079 sf37 1139 4346 575192 176727473842930936678143774 392823 24 3840 349143 37 7474 3774 37373774 OUTLOT D∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆ ∆ ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOH POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPIONEER TRA ILBLUFF CREEK DRIVEUS H I G H W A Y 2 1 2215444222124 B-BPOWERLINE & POLESTO BE RE-LOCATED9B LU F F A R E A BLUFF AREAEXPANDED PONDPONDPRIVATE STREETPRIVATE S T R E E T FIRE TRUCKTURN-AROUND"NO PARKING"FIRE TRUCKTURN-AROUND"NO PARKING"20' BUFFERIMPACT ZONE20' BUFFERIMPACT ZONE20 202022NWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWL NWLNWL NWL NWL NWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWL 40.00'24B-B24B-BPRIVATE STREET24B-BPRIVATE STREET40.00'POWERLINE & POLESTO BE RE-LOCATED 53292130342912342,738 sf2,368 sf2,368 sf2,738 sf373732323737323274 74 74 74 74STREET20 20 125 510 STREET16,244 sfSECTION 26 , TOWNSH IP 116 , RANGE 23060120180·EXISTING ZONING:N/A·PROPOSED ZONING:RLM·GROSS SITE AREA:11.75 ACBLUFF AREA:0.72 AC·NET SITE AREA:11.03 AC·DEVELOPMENT SUMMARYMULTI-FAMILY TOWNHOMES:40 HOMESVILLAS14 HOMES·PROJECT DENSITY:GROSS:±4.60 UN/ACNET: ±4.90 UN/ACSITE DEVELOPMENT DATAIMPERVIOUS COVERAGE1.ALL LOT DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST FOOT.2.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.3.STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY.4.DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED. DRAINAGEAND UTILITY EASEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED OVER ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES A.5.STREET WIDTHS ARE SHOWN FROM BACK OF CURB TO BACK OF CURB.DEVELOPMENT NOTESPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEEASEMENT LINECURB AND GUTTERLOT LINEPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELRETAINING WALLEXISTINGPROPOSEDTIP-OUT CURB AND GUTTERSITE LEGENDSITE AREAALLOWABLE COVERAGE255,915 SF511,830 SFTYPICAL MULTI FAMILY LOT DETAILSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-PPP01.DWG 223CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04/21/2025RMBRMBEJKPIONEER RIDGEPRELIMINARY PLAT221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337PIONEER RIDGE12/13/24PIONEER RIDGE, LLC.04/21/202553774NICHOLAS T. MEYER© 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.###### or ##02/05/202504/07/202504/21/2025..REVISED SITE PLANREVISED SITE PLANREVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE..PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00CONTROLLED ACCESS∆MINIMUM LOT AREALOT STANDARDSMINIMUM LOT FRONTAGESETBACKSFRONTBTWN BUILDINGSSIDE CORNER LOTREARSTANDARDMULTI-FAMILYTOWNHOMES1,800 SF30'20'20'20'10'REAR TO PIONEER TRAIL20'IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE50% MAXIMUMPROPOSED COVERAGE182,673 SF (35%)GUEST STALLS REQUIRED: .25/UNIT; 14 STALLS TOTALGUEST STALLS PROVIDED: 21 TOTAL STALLSPARKING PROVISIONSVILLAS5,445 SF55' @ 20' FRT SBK20'5' GARAGE /10' HOUSE20'30'20'TYPICAL VILLALOT NUMBERLOT AREABUILDINGSETBACK LINEDRAINAGE& UTILITYEASEMENTLOT LINEROAD RIGHTOF WAYTYPICAL LOTDIMENSION20'30'10'5'55'55'109' 109' 307 ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆ ∆ ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆BLUFF CREEK DRIVEPIONEER TRA IL HI G H W A Y 2 1 2 TNHELEV=924.149087929.86SSSB-7 EL=929.869097931.51SSSB-2 EL=931.519105931.76SSSB-3 EL=931.759112912.95SSSB-6 EL=912.959122931.76SSSB-4 EL=931.769127928.08SSSB-8 EL=928.089140947.25SSSB-5 EL=947.259176930.46SSSB-1 EL=930.46EX-MHRE = 929.30EX-MHRE = 916.64EX-MHRE = 910.08EX-MHRE = 906.09EX-MHRE = 903.48EX-MHRE = 900.85EX-MHRE = 924.43EX-MHRE = 924.39EX-MHRE = 901.83EX-MHRE = 904.73EX-MHRE = 923.28SEX-MHRE = 937.53SEX-MHRE = 937.43XXX XPOH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHSTOSTOSANSANSANSANSANSANRE=937.53IE=918.83 (E/W)8" PVCRE=937.43IE=918.13 (N/E/W)SAN8" PVCSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATSTOSTOSTOPOH POH POHPOHHH FIBER OPTICFOFOFO 506250655066FM123 456789101112130 1 2 3 4 5FMFMFMEXPANDED EXISTINGPOND 6NWL=927.0EX 100 YR HWL =930.3PR 100 YR HWL=929.4EOF=930.4928.60PATIOGARAGEOLIVIA2-STORYPORCH12345678910111213141516171812345678910111213141516171819202121123STREET ASTREET B123456789101112131457.28 57.28 57.2867.6955.2555.2555.2555.2555.2555.2555.2555.2555.2555.25 PATIOGARAGEOLIVIA2-STORY1920OUTLOT A2OUTLOT B OUTLOT BOUTLOT B OUTLOT COUTLOT D920930914914 916918922924926928932934934 934.5SOG934.5936.3SOG936.3933.0SOG933.0935.3 SOG 935.3 935.6 927.4 WO 927.4 935.0926.8LO930.0936.6928.4LO931.6932.8924.6LO927.8931.6923.4WO923.4934.8926.6WO926.6935.9927.7WO927.7932.1923.9WO923.9929.1920.9LO924.17.9%7.9%8.4%6.8%7.9%7.0%7.0%7.0%7.2%8.7% 5.0%4.1%5.3%3.1%7.8%5.2%5.3%3.3%7.8%5.0%6.1%5.2%4.0%6.3%4.4%7.1%3.2% 4.6% 4.0%7.8%7.6%5.0%7.4%8.8%7.7%7.2%4.2%8.8% 7.2% 7.0% 5.3% 7.9% 6.0% 8.5% 6.9% 6.5% 6.8% 5.7% 3.0% 4.4% 3.5%937.6929.4LO932.6934.9926.7WO926.7935.9927.7WO927.73:13:13:13:14:1 25.0%935.9 SOG 935.9 937.5 SOG 937.5 936.6 928.4 WO 928.4 33.3%932.6924.4WO924.4935.8927.6WO927.6934.5SOG934.5935.4SOG935.4937.3SOG937.3935.8SOG935.8933.3SOG 933.3930.1921.9LO925.1933.1924.9WO924.9 936.9928.7WO928.73:13:13:13:14:1 4:1 4:1920920930930930922922924924926926926928928928932930930928928932 90091092093089890290490690891291491691892292492692893290 2 90 4 906 908 912914 91 6 918 92 2 9 2 4 92 6 9 2 8 9 3 2 9 3 4 9369209209169169189189229229249249269309229229249249269269269289329349 3 6 9 3 83:13:1 NWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWL 9 4 0 9 3 4 9 3 4 9369369 3 8 9 4 2 944 94 4 932 934 93 6 938910920902 9 0 49069089129149 1 6918922924926928932932EXPANDED EXISTINGPOND 6NWL=927.0EX 100 YR HWL =930.4PR 100 YR HWL=929.5EOF=930.435.435.029.431.332.429.734.834.5NWL NWL NWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWL 35.236.035.235.034.534.835.21.1%SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF S F S F SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF SF SFSFSFSFSFSF HP33.5POND 2-REUSENWL=922.5BOTTOM = 913.0100 YR HWL = 925.6EOF=925.6BERM=926.14.6%4:10.8%0 1 2 3 4 5 1.1%35.4930932932932 934934934 936936 920920 920930 914914 916916 918 918922922 922924924924926926926928 9329209209189189229249269289209309149169189229249269289329349109209089129149169189229249263:1 9.0% 8.5% 8.0%936.7SOG936.7933.6SOG933.6931.9SOG(1)932.6934.0925.8LO929.0933.0924.8R933.0933.8925.6LO928.829.3 31.033.234.232.031.730.629.729.328.329.128.831.732.633.534.435.335.734.833.532.331.130.5 34.335.436.534.533.531.732.2HP33.0LP28.6EOF30.8EX EOF22.521:117:110:1EOF20.521.021.021.021.021.019.017.518.533.532.5930940940940932934936938942942 9209129 1 2 9149149169189 2 2 924910920904906908912914916918 922 900 910 896 898902904 906 908 912 914 91691893092492692893293491090490690891291491629.729.031.930.32.0%2.5%2.5%3.1%31.73.0%28.82.0% 2 . 0%2.2%2.0%28.031.231.52.0%30.737.337.330.932.336.036.731.329.936.336.3VALLEYGUTTER (TYP)123 456789101112130 1 2 3 4 53.45%1.71%1.71%2.28%2.28%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.45%2.00%1.25%2.00%2.25%3.91%2.25%Overall LP 0+05.99ELEV 922.52 HP 5+30.29ELEV 935.492.26% 3.39%1.95% 2 .2 6 % 2 .2 6 %SILT FENCE (TYP.)INSTALL HEAVY DUTY SILTFENCE AT NWL OF POND (TYP.)INSTALL HEAVY DUTY SILTFENCE AT NWL OF POND (TYP)26.326.226.0ROCKCONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE (TYP)NWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLROCKCONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE (TYP)SURMOUNTABLECURB & GUTTER (TYP)SURMOUNTABLECURB & GUTTER (TYP)SIGHT LINE30.428.2RELOCATED WATER COURSEINLET PROTECTION (TYP)EROSION CONTROLBLANKET (TYP)DITCH CHECKS (TYP)SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-GDF.DWG 224CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04/21/2025RMBRMBEJKPIONEER RIDGEPRELIMINARY GRADINGPLAN221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337PIONEER RIDGE12/13/244125704/21/2025RYAN BLUHMPIONEER RIDGE, LLC.PRELIMINARY PLANS© 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com0'60'120'180'1" = 60'60'12' or 6'02/05/202504/07/202504/21/2025..REVISED SITE PLANREVISED SITE PLANREVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE..PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00PROPERTY LINEEXISTINGPROPOSEDINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOUREROSION CONTROL LEGENDEROSION CONTROL NOTES982980982980SILT FENCESFSTOSTORM SEWERTPFTREE PROTECTION FENCETREE LINERETAINING WALL (MODULAR BLOCK)GRADING LIMITSGL1.NATURAL TOPOGRAPHY AND SOIL CONDITIONS MUST BE PROTECTED, INCLUDING RETENTIONONSITE OF NATIVE TOPSOIL TO THE GREATEST EXTEND POSSIBLE.2.ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN-PLACE PRIOR TO ANYEXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUNDCOVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON-SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND ORREMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OFEXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TOEROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAY BALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITYSHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT.3.ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OF EACHWORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO DETAILSTO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS.4.REDUNDANT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE NECESSARY WHEN SOIL DISTURBANCE ISWITHIN 50 FEET OF SURFACE WATERS. REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS COULD INCLUDE:4.1.TWO ROWS OF SILT FENCE (SEPARATED BY 8 FEET); OR4.2.SILT FENCE AND A TOPSOIL BERM (STABILIZE BERM WITH MULCH); OR4.3.SILT FENCE AND FIBER LOGS; OR4.4.TOPSOIL BERM AND FIBER LOGS (STABILIZE BERM WITH MULCH).5.REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO DISTURBING WITHIN 50 FEETOF THE SURFACE WATER.6.ADDITIONAL MEASURES, SICH AS HYDRAULIC MULCHING AND OTHER PRACTICES AS SPECIFIEDBY THE DISTRICT MUSTED BE USED ON SLOPES OF 3:1 (H:V) OR STEEPER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATESTABILIZATION.7.FINAL SITE STABILIZATION MEASURES MUST SPECIFY THAT AT LEAST SIX INCHES OF TOPSOILCONTAINING AT LEAST 5% ORGANIC MATTER ORGANIC MATTER BE SPREAD ANDINCORPORATED INTO THE UNDERLYING SOIL DURING FINAL SITE TREATMENT WHEREVERTOPSOIL HAS BEEN REMOVED.8.CONSTRUCTION SITE WASTE SUCH AS DISCARDED BUIDLING MATERIALS, CONCRETE TRUCKWASHOUT, CHEMICALS, LITTER AND SANITARY WASTE BE PROPERLY MANAGED.9.ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BE MAINTAINED UNTILCOMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION NAD VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED SUFFICIENTLY TO ENSURESTABILITY OF THE SITE, AS DETERMINED BY THE DISTRICT.10.ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BE REMOVED UPON FINALSTABILIZATION.11.SOIL SURFACES COMPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTIONAND REMAINING PERVIOUS UPONOCMPLETIONOF CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DECOMPACTED TO ACHIEVE A SOIL COMPACTIONTESTING PRESSURE OF LESS THAN 1,400 KILOPASCALS OR 200 POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH INTHE UPPER 12 INCHES OF THE SOIL PROFILE WHILE TAKING CARE TO PROTECT UTILITIES, TREEROOTS, AND OTHER EXISTING VEGETATION.12.ALL DISTURBED AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 CALENDER DAYS AFTERLAND-DISTURBING WORK HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED ON A PROPERTY THATDRAINS TO AN IMPAIRED WATER, WITHIN 14 DAYS ELSEWHERE.13.THE PERMITTEE MUST ATA MINIMUM, INPSECT, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBEDSURFACES AND ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND SOIL STABILIZATIONMEASURES EVERY DAY WORK IS PERFORMED ON THE SITE AND AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTILLAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. THEREAFTER, THE PERMITTEE MUST PERFORM THERERESPONSIBILITIES AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL VEGATATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED. THE PERMITTEEWILL MAINTAIN A LOG OF ACTIVITIES UNDER THIS.ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETTURF REINFORCEMENT MATPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELSILT FENCE-POST GRADINGPOST-SFHEAVY DUTY SILT FENCEHDSFREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLRSCINLET PROTECTIONEROSION CONTROL CHECKS/BIOROLLSRELOCATED WATER COURSE308 HYD (TYP.)HYD (TYP.)8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0 .51%8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.50%8" PVC SDR 26 @ 1.76%8" PVC SDR 26 @ 2.97% 8" PVC SD R 2 6 @ 2 . 0 8 %NWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWL NWL NWL NWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWL NWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWL PATIOGARAGEOLIVIA2-STORYPORCH12345678910111213141516171812345678910111213141516171819202121123STREET ASTREET B1234567891011121314PATIOGARAGEOLIVIA2-STORY1920OUTLOT A2OUTLOT B OUTLOT BOUTLOT B OUTLOT COUTLOT DHEMLOCK WAYMAYAPPLE PASS S A N SAN SAN SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSSSSSSSSSWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WA T WA TWA TWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆ ∆ ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆BLUFF CREEK DRIVEPIONEER TRA IL HI G H W A Y 2 1 2 EX-MHRE = 929.30EX-MHRE = 916.64EX-MHRE = 910.08EX-MHRE = 906.09EX-MHRE = 903.48EX-MHEX-MHRE = 900.85EX-MHRE = 924.43EX-MHRE = 924.39EX-MHRE = 901.83EX-MHRE = 904.73EX-MHRE = 923.28SEX-MHRE = 937.53SEX-MHRE = 937.43XXXX POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHSTOSTOSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATSTOSTOSTOPOH POH POH POH POHPOHPOHFOFOFO LIFTSTATIONFM123 456789101112130 1 2 3 4 5FMFMFM012312345EX. 15" STMEX. 12" STMEX. 20" STMEX. 12" STMEX. 12" STMEX. 15" STMEX. 12" STMEX. 24" STMEX. TRAIL 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.50%8" PVC SDR 26 @0.46%8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.56%EX. TRAILMHRE=935.94IE=923.50 (8" S)MHRE=932.65IE=915.41 (8" W)MHRE=931.83IE=919.54 (8" S)MHRE=928.52IE=916.59 (8" W)MHRE=935.35IE=914.32 (8" SW)CBMH-104RE=928.89IE=923.06 (18" S)IE=922.96 (18" N)D=5.9CBMH-107RE=928.09IE=925.10 (12" N)D=3.024" FES-1009.2 CU YD CLASS III RIPRAPIE=922.50CBMH-105RE=927.28IE=923.40 (12" W)IE=923.30 (18" N)D=4.0CBMH-106RE=927.33IE=923.35 (12" E)D=4.0STMH-101RE=928.08IE=922.72 (24" W)IE=922.72 (24" NE)D=5.412" FES-864.4 CU YD CLASS III RIPRAPIE=909.97OCS-84RE=924.05IE=920.12 (12" SE)IE=910.10 (12" E)D=14.012" FES-83IE=920.50CBMH-95RE=924.90IE=914.37 (18" E)IE=914.37 (18" W)D=10.518" FES-936.4 CU YD CLASS III RIPRAPIE=913.9018" FESRE=916.33IE=914.50 (18" W)CBMH-109RE=929.37IE=926.40 (12" E)D=3.0CBMH-108RE=932.15IE=924.53 (12" S)IE=925.92 (12" W)IE=923.63 (18" E)D=8.5CBMH-103RE=929.01IE=922.82 (18" S)IE=922.72 (21" N)D=6.3CBMH-102RE=931.84IE=923.45 (18" W)IE=922.33 (21" S)IE=923.05 (24" E)D=13.54.0' SUMP=918.33MHRE=935.86IE=922.90 (8" W)MHRE=928.47IE=912.69 (8" W)MHRE=928.58IE=918.00 (4" E)CBMH-57RE=929.96IE=925.98 (12" NW)D=4.015" FES-614.8 CU YD CLASS III RIPRAPIE=925.50CBMH-91RE=925.08IE=914.26 (18" E)IE=914.26 (18" W)D=14.8CBMH-59RE=929.64IE=925.86 (12" SE)IE=925.76 (15" NW)D=7.94.0' SUMP=921.76MHRE=928.51IE= 912.154" FORCEMAINDIRECTIONALLY DRILLEDIE=916.13CONNECT FORCEMAININTO EX MHMHRE=927.26IE=912.33 (8" N)HYD (TYP.)8" GV (TYP.)12" FES-1194.4 CU YD CLASS III RIPRAPIE=912.00STMH-117RE=915.87IE=912.35 (12" SW)IE=912.35 (12" E)D=3.5STMH-118RE=915.78IE=912.14 (12" W)IE=912.04 (12" E)D=3.7CBMH-115RE=917.35IE=914.44 (12" SW)IE=914.34 (12" NE)D=3.0STMH-116RE=915.85IE=912.90 (12" SW)IE=912.80 (12" NE)D=3.0CBMH-113RE=918.65IE=915.74 (12" W)IE=915.64 (12" E)D=3.0CBMH-110RE=924.16IE=921.20 (12" S)D=3.0CBMH-111RE=924.16IE=921.14 (12" N)IE=921.04 (12" SE)D=3.1STMH-112RE=920.05IE=917.06 (12" NW)IE=916.96 (12" E)D=3.18" DIP WM 8" DIP WM 8" DIP WM18" RCP STRM@0.57%18" RCP STRM@ 0.34%12" R C P S T R M @ 0. 3 0 %EXPANDED EXISTINGPOND 6NWL=927.0EX 100 YR HWL =930.4PR 100 YR HWL=929.7EOF=930.48" DIP WM8" DIP WM8" DIP WM12" RCP STRM @ 0 .30% 21" RCP STRM @ 0.50% 18" RCP S T R M @ 0.50%12" RCP STRM @ 0.30%12" RCP STRM @ 0 .30%12" RCP STRM @1.95%12" RCP STRM @ 0.78%12" RCP STRM @1.65%12" RCP STRM @ 2.80%15" RCPSTRM @0.75%12" RCP STRM@ 0.30% 12" RC P S T R M @ 0 . 5 0 %24" RCP STRM @ 0.41%24 " R C P S T R M @ 0 . 5 1 %12" RCP STRM @ 0.50%18" RCP STRM@0.44%12" RCPSTRM @0.23%18" RCP STRM@0.51%12" RCPSTRM @0.29%POND 2-REUSENWL=922.5BOTTOM = 913.0100 YR HWL = 925.6EOF=925.6BERM=926.112" RCPSTRM @0.30%SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-UTP01.DWG 225CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04/21/2025RMBRMBEJKPIONEER RIDGEPRELIMINARY UTILITYPLAN221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337PIONEER RIDGE12/13/244125704/21/2025RYAN BLUHMPIONEER RIDGE, LLC.PRELIMINARY PLANS© 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com0'60'120'180'1" = 60'60'12' or 6'02/05/202504/07/202504/21/2025..REVISED SITE PLANREVISED SITE PLANREVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE..PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00SANEXISTINGPROPOSEDSTOWATWATOVERALL UTILITY LEGEND1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONSPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANYDIFFERENCES.2.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE 2018 ED.OF THE "STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATERMAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWERAND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION BY THE CITY ENGINEERINGASSOCIATION OF MINN." AND TO THE "STANDARDSPECIFICATION FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION" MINN. DEPT.OF TRANS., 2020 EDITION AND SUPPLEMENTALSPECIFICATIONS SEPTEMBER 2022. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLBE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ALL PROCEDURES AS OUTLINED BYTHE LOCAL AGENCY.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE THE NECESSARY PERMITSFOR ALL WORK OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY LIMITS.4.VERIFY EXISTING INVERT LOCATION & ELEVATION PRIOR TOBEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONECALL" FOR FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO UTILITYINSTALLATION.GENERAL UTILITY NOTESSDTSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINHYDRANTDRAIN TILE309 STREET 29109159209259309359409109159209259309359400+001+002+003+004+005+005+753.39%1.95%2.26%PVI STA = -0+00.00PVI ELEV = 923.98PVI STA = 5+57.54PVI ELEV = 937.26L.P ELEV = 927.98L.P. STA = 1+77.24PVI STA = 2+00.36PVI ELEV = 928.51A.D. = 1.13%K = 40.9846.23' VCPVC = 1+77.24ELEV = 927.98PVT = 2+23.48ELEV = 929.29H.P ELEV = 933.06H.P. STA = 3+41.81PVI STA = 3+25.00PVI ELEV = 932.73A.D. = -1.44%K = 23.3533.63' VCPVC = 3+08.19ELEV = 932.16PVT = 3+41.81ELEV = 933.06STREET 19159209259309359409459509159209259309359409459500+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+0010+0011+0012+0013+0013+503.50%-3.45%2.00%-2.00%1.25%3.91%2.25%-1.71%2.28%PVI STA = 0+05.99PVI ELEV = 922.52 PVI STA = 8+98.87 PVI ELEV = 928.18 PVI STA = 9+21.45 PVI ELEV = 928.63 PVI STA = 9+35.31 PVI ELEV = 928.35 PVI STA = 13+10.00 PVI ELEV = 936.24H.P ELEV = 927.43H.P. STA = 1+54.94PVI STA = 1+29.94PVI ELEV = 926.86A.D. = -1.22%K = 40.9350.00' VCPVC = 1+04.95ELEV = 925.99PVT = 1+54.94ELEV = 927.43 H.P ELEV = 935.49H.P. STA = 5+30.29PVI STA = 5+24.94PVI ELEV = 935.86A.D. = -3.99%K = 18.8075.00' VCPVC = 4+87.44 ELEV = 935.01 PVT = 5+62.44 ELEV = 935.22 H.P ELEV = 931.16H.P. STA = 7+99.94PVI STA = 8+24.94PVI ELEV = 930.73A.D. = -1.74%K = 28.7150.00' VCPVC = 7+99.94 ELEV = 931.16 PVT = 8+49.94 ELEV = 929.87 H.P ELEV = 931.44H.P. STA = 10+24.94PVI STA = 9+99.94PVI ELEV = 930.88A.D. = -1.66%K = 30.0550.00' VCPVC = 9+74.94 ELEV = 929.90 PVT = 10+24.94 ELEV = 931.44 H.P ELEV = 934.56H.P. STA = 11+74.94PVI STA = 11+49.94PVI ELEV = 934.25A.D. = -1.00%K = 49.9250.00' VCPVC = 11+24.94 ELEV = 933.69 PVT = 11+74.94 ELEV = 934.56 SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-DTP01.DWG 226CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04/21/2025RMBRMBEJKPIONEER RIDGESTREET PROFILES221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337PIONEER RIDGE12/13/244125704/21/2025RYAN BLUHMPIONEER RIDGE, LLC.© 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50'10' or 5'02/05/202504/07/202504/21/2025..REVISED SITE PLANREVISED SITE PLANREVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE..PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00310 SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-DTP01.DWG 227CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04/21/2025RMBRMBEJKPIONEER RIDGEDETAILS221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337PIONEER RIDGE12/13/244125704/21/2025RYAN BLUHMPIONEER RIDGE, LLC.© 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### or ##02/05/202504/07/202504/21/2025..REVISED SITE PLANREVISED SITE PLANREVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE..PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00311 SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-DTP01.DWG 228CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04/21/2025RMBRMBEJKPIONEER RIDGEDETAILS221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337PIONEER RIDGE12/13/244125704/21/2025RYAN BLUHMPIONEER RIDGE, LLC.© 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### or ##02/05/202504/07/202504/21/2025..REVISED SITE PLANREVISED SITE PLANREVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE..PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00312 SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-DTP01.DWG 229CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04/21/2025RMBRMBEJKPIONEER RIDGEDETAILS221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337PIONEER RIDGE12/13/244125704/21/2025RYAN BLUHMPIONEER RIDGE, LLC.© 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### or ##02/05/202504/07/202504/21/2025..REVISED SITE PLANREVISED SITE PLANREVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE..PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00313 SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-DTP01.DWG 2210CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04/21/2025RMBRMBEJKPIONEER RIDGEDETAILS221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337PIONEER RIDGE12/13/244125704/21/2025RYAN BLUHMPIONEER RIDGE, LLC.© 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### or ##02/05/202504/07/202504/21/2025..REVISED SITE PLANREVISED SITE PLANREVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE..PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00314 SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-DTP01.DWG 2211CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04/21/2025RMBRMBEJKPIONEER RIDGEDETAILS221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337PIONEER RIDGE12/13/244125704/21/2025RYAN BLUHMPIONEER RIDGE, LLC.© 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### or ##02/05/202504/07/202504/21/2025..REVISED SITE PLANREVISED SITE PLANREVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE..PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00315 SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-DTP01.DWG 2212CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04/21/2025RMBRMBEJKPIONEER RIDGEDETAILS221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337PIONEER RIDGE12/13/244125704/21/2025RYAN BLUHMPIONEER RIDGE, LLC.© 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### or ##02/05/202504/07/202504/21/2025..REVISED SITE PLANREVISED SITE PLANREVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE..PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00316 SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-DTP01.DWG 2213CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04/21/2025RMBRMBEJKPIONEER RIDGEDETAILS221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337PIONEER RIDGE12/13/244125704/21/2025RYAN BLUHMPIONEER RIDGE, LLC.© 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### or ##02/05/202504/07/202504/21/2025..REVISED SITE PLANREVISED SITE PLANREVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE..PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00928.5921.5912.15906.15907.0908.0909.0910.0911.0317 SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-DTP01.DWG 2214CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04/21/2025RMBRMBEJKPIONEER RIDGEDETAILS221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337PIONEER RIDGE12/13/244125704/21/2025RYAN BLUHMPIONEER RIDGE, LLC.© 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### or ##02/05/202504/07/202504/21/2025..REVISED SITE PLANREVISED SITE PLANREVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE..PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.007.3'7.3'6" TOPSOIL, SEED,& MULCH OR SODVARIES LAST REVISED:08/15/17TYPICAL LOTGD25AINDICATES A CUSTOM HOUSE PAD WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETELY GRADED OR PREPAREDTO PROPOSED GRADE. ELEVATIONS AND HOUSE STYLES SHOWN ARE ENGINEERS SUGGESTEDDESIGN FOR CUSTOM LOTS AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE DEVELOPER.G980.6989.6 99980.0 983.0WO989.2 991.0983.0DRIVEWAY LOT CORNER ELEVATIONCUSTOMSOG = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT.WO = FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT, GRADED FOR 8.4' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND GRADE AT THE WALKOUT TO FRONT GROUND AT GARAGE DOOR.R = RAMBLER, GRADED FOR 7.7' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR.R(1) = RAMBLER, GRADED FOR 7.0' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR.LO = FULL BASEMENT LOOKOUT GRADED FOR 5.0' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND GRADE AT THE LOOKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.DRAINAGE ARROWLOT NUMBERMINIMUM BASEMENTFLOOR ELEVATIONREAR GROUND GRADE ATWALKOUT/LOOKOUT (0.7'BELOW BASEMENT FLOORELEVATION FOR WALKOUT)FRONT GROUND GRADEAT GARAGE DOORNOTE:1.THE NUMBER IN THE PARENTHESIS INDICATES THE NUMBER OF BLOCKS THAT THE GARAGE IS DROPPED. EACH BLOCK=8".ROW TOWNHOMES SLAB ON GRADE (SOG)ROW TOWNHOMES LOOK-OUT (LO)ROW TOWNHOMES WALK-OUT (WO)ENGINEERED FILLENGINEERED FILLSUITABLE BEARING SOIL (TYP.)ENGINEERED FILL1:1SETBACKGARAGE FLOOR EL.1.20' TO SUBGRADE0.8'4:1 MAX3.0% MINN.T.S.1: 1SUITABLE BEARING SOIL (TYP.)0.5' TOPSOIL1:1FINISHED GRADE AFTER HOUSEFINISHED GRADE FOR PADSLAB ON GRADE VILLA (SOG) 55' Wide Lots10'HOLD DOWNLIMITSPAD HOLD DOWN = 0.70'VARIESCL ROADWAY8'R.O.W17'3'30'30'10'0.4'FINISH GRADEGROUND @BACK OF HOUSEOVER SIZING 12' MIN - 17'MAX3'OVER SIZING 5.3%4:1 MAX20'318 ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆ ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆SSXXPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOH POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHSTOSTOSANSANSANSANSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STOWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATSTOPOH POHPOHPOHPOHSTO STOHHFOFONWLNWLNWLNWLN W LNWLNWLNWLNWL NWL NWL NWL NWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF S F SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF SFSFSFSFEX EOF22.5FMFMFM04/21/202553774NICHOLAS T. MEYERSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-TPP01.DWG 2215CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04/21/2025RMBRMBEJKPIONEER RIDGEOVERALL TREEPRESERVATION221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337PIONEER RIDGE12/13/24PIONEER RIDGE, LLC.© 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.###### or ##02/05/202504/07/202504/21/2025..REVISED SITE PLANREVISED SITE PLANREVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE..PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00DENOTES EXISTING CONIFEROUSTREE TO REMAINDENOTES EXISTING DECIDUOUSTREE TO REMAINDENOTES EXISTING CONIFEROUSTREE TO BE REMOVEDDENOTES EXISTING DECIDUOUSTREE TO BE REMOVEDDENOTES SILT FENCE /GRADING &DISTURBANCE LIMITSFTREE PRESERVATION REGULATIONSTREE PRESERVATION CALULATIONSLEGEND" T " POST OR EQUAL6' MAX.ORANGE MESH CONSTRUCTION FENCELOCATION AS SHOWN ON PLAN. MAINTAINMAXIMUM DISTANCE FROM TRUNK POSSIBLE.ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCESTAKED EVERY 6'1. PRUNING WILL BE DONE BY PROFESSIONALS DURING APPROPRIATE PRUNING SEASON.2.NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS, OPERATION OF MACHINERY, OR DEVELOPMENT OF ANY SORT WILL OCCURWITHIN THE FENCE-LINE WITHOUT APPROVAL IN WRITING FROM THE CITY.3.SITE GRADING TO BE DONE ONLY AFTER PROTECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN, CITY HAS APPROVEDFENCING LOCATIONS, AND ALL CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN BRIEFED ON TREE PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES.LAST REVISED:05/28/15TREE PROTECTIONTP08NOTES:PLANELEVATIONDRIPLINE6' METAL FENCE POST. STAKE EVERY 6'MAXIMUM.TREE PROTECTION DETAILPRELIMINARYPLANS0'80'160'240'1" = 80'BASE LINE CANOPY COVERAGE PER ACRECOMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATIONCOMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL / INSTITUTIONALHIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIALMEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIALLOW DENSITY RESIDENTIALLARGE LOT RESIDENTIAL80%-100%28%35%40%55%68%60%-79%25%30%35%46%56%40%-59%20%25%30%35%43%20%-39%14%20%25%30%35%19% OR LESS10%15%20%25%25%(2)PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF DEVELOPMENT PLANS, A TREE SURVEY OF THE SITE SHALL BE PREPARED BY A REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,LICENSED FORESTER, OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL APPROVED BY THE CITY. THE TREE SURVEY SHALL REFLECT CONDITIONS ON SITE AT THE TIME OFSUBMITTAL, OR SHALL HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND UPDATED NO MORE THAN TWO YEARS PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL DATE. THIS SURVEY SHALLINCLUDE THE SPECIES, DBH SIZE, CONDITION, LOCATION OF ALL TREES OVER TEN INCHES IN DIAMETER AND ANY DAMAGED OR DISEASED TREESON SITE. ALL SIGNIFICANT SPECIAL, DAMAGED OR DISEASED TREES SHALL BE TAGGED AND IDENTIFIED BY NUMBER ON THE SURVEY. ADELINEATION OF THE EXISTING CANOPY COVERAGE AREA(S) WHICH OUTLINES ALL AREAS COVERED BY TREE CANOPY SHALL BE INCLUDED ASPART OF THE SURVEY. ADDITIONALLY, ALL DAMAGED AND DISEASED TREES SHALL BE CATALOGED WITH THE NATURE AND EXTENT OF ANYDAMAGE OR DISEASE SPECIFIED.a.BASED ON THIS SURVEY AND EITHER SITE OBSERVATION AND MEASUREMENT OR A CURRENT AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH (TAKEN WITHIN ONE YEAROF THE DATE OF PLAN SUBMITTAL) INTERPRETATION, THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE CALCULATED:1) BASE LINE CANOPY COVERAGE2) MINIMUM CANOPY COVERAGE REQUIREMENTSb.THE FOLLOWING TABLE SHALL BE USED TO DETERMINE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF CANOPY COVERAGE THAT MUST BE MAINTAINED ORPROVIDED ON-SITE AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT. IT SHALL REPRESENT THE MINIMUM CANOPY COVERAGE, CONSISTING OF EXISTING TREECANOPY AND/OR ADDITIONAL TREES REQUIRED FOR THE SITE. EXISTING WETLAND AREAS, BLUFF AREAS, AND DEDICATED PARK LANDLOCATED ON SITE SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM THE CALCULATION OF SITE AREA IN THE DETERMINATION OF SITE COVERAGE. IF A FORESTED ISTO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY FOR PARK LAND, THEN THIS AREA SHALL NOTE BE INCLUDED IN THE BASE LINE CANOPY COVERAGE AREACALCULATION NOR SHALL IT COUNT TOWARDS THE MINIMUM CANOPY COVERAGE FOR THE SITE.BASE LINE CANOPY COVERAGE IS THE CANOPY COVERAGE EXISTING AT THE TIME THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION IS FILED WITH THE CITY. MINIMUMCANOPY COVERAGE IS DETERMINED BY USING THE MATRIX.d. FOR DEVELOPMENTS THAT DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM CANOPY COVERAGE, THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO DEVELOP AFORESTATION PLAN TO BRING THE TOTAL CANOPY COVERAGE UP TO THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT. WHERE EXISTING WOODLANDS AREREMOVED OR THERE IS A LOSS OF TREES THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE USED TO MEET THE CANOPY COVERAGE RETENTION REQUIREMENT, THEDEVELOPER SHALL DEVELOP A WOODLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN. THE REPLACEMENT PLAN MUST DESIGNATE AN AREA AT LEAST ONE ANDTWO-TENTHS (1.2) TIMES THE REMOVED CANOPY COVERAGE AREA THAT SHALL BE PLANTED WITH REPLACEMENT TREES FOR THOSE REMOVED.THESE PLANS SHALL LOCATE ADDITIONAL TREES EITHER AS A CONTINUATION OF EXISTING STANDS OF TREES THAT ARE TO BE PRESERVED ORCREATE NEW STANDS OF TREES IN DESIRABLE LOCATIONS SUCH AS ALONG ROADWAY CORRIDORS, ON THE NORTH AND WEST PERIMETERSOF THE DEVELOPMENT, IN COMMON OPEN AREAS, OR ADJACENT TO PARK FACILITIES.e. THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA SHALL BE FOLLOWED IN ESTABLISHING MINIMUM CANOPY COVERAGE:1) WHEN PLANTING TREES, ONE TREE SHALL BE DEEMED TO PROVIDE 1,089 SQUARE FEET OF REQUIRED CANOPY COVERAGE;2) TREES MUST BE FROM THE APPROVED LIST OF DESIRABLE SPECIES (PREFERENCE GIVEN FOR TREES DESIGNATED AS NATIVE);3) NO MORE THAN TEN PERCENT OF THE TREES MAY BE FROM ANY ONE TREE SPECIES, NO MORE THAN 20 PERCENT OF THE TREES MAY BEFROM ANY ONE GENUS, AND NO MORE THAN 30 PERCENT OF TREES FROM ANY ONE FAMILY;4) OVERSTORY TREES SHALL BE AT LEAST 212-INCH CALIPER AND UNDERSTORY TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 112-INCH CALIPER;5) CONIFER TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF SIX FEET IN HEIGHT;6) PLANT MATERIALS USED FOR THE REFORESTATION SHALL BE OF A SIMILAR SPECIES AS VEGETATION FOUND ON-SITE;7) TREES SHALL BE USED THAT APPROPRIATE TO THE SOIL CONDITIONS FOUND ONSITE;8) TREES SHALL BE FROM CERTIFIED NURSERY STOCK AS DEFINED AND CONTROLLED BY M.S. §˜§˜ 18.44 THROUGH 18.61, THE PLANT PESTACT; AND9) NOT LESS THAN 75 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL TREES REQUIRED SHALL BE OVERSTORY SPECIES.BLUFF AREA DEDUCTIONTREE CANOPYTREE CANOPY SAVED319 ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆ ∆ ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆SXXXX POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHSTOSTOSTOSANSANSANSANSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STOSTOSTOWATWATWAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATSTOSTOSTOHHFOFOFONWLNWL NWL NWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWL SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF SF SF SFFMFMFMFMFM500150025003500450055006500750085009501050115013501250145015501650175018501950205021502250235024502550265027 50285029503050315190519151925193519451955196519751985199SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-TPP01.DWG 2216CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04/21/2025RMBRMBEJKPIONEER RIDGEPRELIMINARY TREEPRESERVATION PLAN221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337PIONEER RIDGE12/13/24PIONEER RIDGE, LLC.04/21/202553774NICHOLAS T. MEYER© 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.###### or ##02/05/202504/07/202504/21/2025..REVISED SITE PLANREVISED SITE PLANREVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE..PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00PRELIMINARYPLANS0'50'100'150'1" = 50'DENOTES EXISTING CONIFEROUSTREE TO REMAINDENOTES EXISTING DECIDUOUSTREE TO REMAINDENOTES EXISTING CONIFEROUSTREE TO BE REMOVEDDENOTES EXISTING DECIDUOUSTREE TO BE REMOVEDDENOTES SILT FENCE /GRADING &DISTURBANCE LIMITSFLEGENDBLUFF AREA DEDUCTIONTREE CANOPYTREE CANOPY SAVED320 ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆ ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆∆X XPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOH POHSTOWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWL NWL NWLSFSFSFSFSF SF SF SF SF SF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF SF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFEX EOF22.550165022502350245025502650275028502950305031503250335034503550365037503850395040504150425043504450455046504750485049505050515052505350545055505650575058505950605061506250635064506550665067506850695070507150725073507450755076507750785079508050815082508350845085508650875088508950905091509250935094509550965097509850995100510151025103510451055106510751085109511051115112511351145115511651175118511951205121512251235124512551265127512851295130513151325133513451355136513751385139514051415142514351445145514651475148514951505151515251535154515551565157515851595160516151625163516451655166516751685169517051715172517351745175517651775178517951805181518251835184518551865187518851895190519151925193519451955196519751985199SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-TPP01.DWG 2217CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04/21/2025RMBRMBEJKPIONEER RIDGEPRELIMINARY TREEPRESERVATION PLAN221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337PIONEER RIDGE12/13/24PIONEER RIDGE, LLC.04/21/202553774NICHOLAS T. MEYER© 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.###### or ##02/05/202504/07/202504/21/2025..REVISED SITE PLANREVISED SITE PLANREVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE..PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00PRELIMINARYPLANS0'50'100'150'1" = 50'DENOTES EXISTING CONIFEROUSTREE TO REMAINDENOTES EXISTING DECIDUOUSTREE TO REMAINDENOTES EXISTING CONIFEROUSTREE TO BE REMOVEDDENOTES EXISTING DECIDUOUSTREE TO BE REMOVEDDENOTES SILT FENCE /GRADING &DISTURBANCE LIMITSFLEGENDBLUFF AREA DEDUCTIONTREE CANOPYTREE CANOPY SAVED321 SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-TPP01.DWG 2218CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04/21/2025RMBRMBEJKPIONEER RIDGEPRELIMINARY TREEPRESERVATION DATA221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337PIONEER RIDGE12/13/24PIONEER RIDGE, LLC.04/21/202553774NICHOLAS T. MEYER© 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.###### or ##02/05/202504/07/202504/21/2025..REVISED SITE PLANREVISED SITE PLANREVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE..PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00PRELIMINARYPLANSTREE PRESERVATION DATA322 ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆SSXXPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOH POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHSTOSTOSANSANSANSANSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STOWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATSTOPOH POHPOHSTO STOHHFOFOEX EOF22.5FMFMFM12345678910111213141516171812345678910111213141516171819202121123STREET ASTREET B12345678910111213141920OUTLOT A2OUTLOT B OUTLOT BOUTLOT B OUTLOT COUTLOT DCODECOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZEROOTSPACING O.C.MATURE SIZEDECIDUOUS TREES - 79AGGAUTUMN GOLD MAIDENHAIR TREE / GINKGO BILOBA 'AUTUMN GOLD'2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 50` W 30`HAKCOMMON HACKBERRY / CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 50`-75` W 50`KDCDECAF® KENTUCKY COFFEETREE / GYMNOCLADUS DIOICA 'MCKBRANCHED'2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 50` W 40`FFMFALL FIESTA® SUGAR MAPLE / ACER SACCHARUM 'BAILSTA'2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 50`-75` W 50`FYLFRONTYARD® AMERICAN LINDEN / TILIA AMERICANA 'BAILYARD'2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 60`-70` W 30`-40`NOCNORTHERN CATALPA / CATALPA SPECIOSA2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 40`-60` W 20`-40`PREPRINCETON AMERICAN ELM / ULMUS AMERICANA 'PRINCETON'2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 60`-80` W 40`-60`REORED OAK / QUERCUS RUBRA2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 50`-70` W 40`-50`RSMRED SUNSET® MAPLE / ACER RUBRUM 'FRANKSRED'2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 45` W 35`RIBRIVER BIRCH / BETULA NIGRA2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 50`-75` W 50`SGMSIENNA GLEN® MAPLE / ACER X FREEMANII 'SIENNA'2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 40`-50` W 35`-40`SKHSKYLINE® HONEY LOCUST / GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS 'SKYCOLE'2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 50` W 30`-35`SWOSWAMP WHITE OAK / QUERCUS BICOLOR2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 50`-60` W 60`-80`EVERGREEN TREES - 146BHSBLACK HILLS SPRUCE / PICEA GLAUCA DENSATA6` HT.B&BAS SHOWNH 35`-45` W 20`-25`COFCONCOLOR FIR / ABIES CONCOLOR6` HT.B&BAS SHOWNH 40`-50` W 15`-30`NRPNORWAY PINE / PINUS RESINOSA6` HT.B&BAS SHOWNH 50`-80` W 30`-40`NOSNORWAY SPRUCE / PICEA ABIES6` HT.B&BAS SHOWNH 50`-70` W 25`-30`POPPONDEROSA PINE / PINUS PONDEROSA6` HT.B&BAS SHOWNH 60`-80` W 25`-30`QYT3841716243335519202120196ORNAMENTAL TREES - 3STCSHOWTIME™ CRABAPPLE / MALUS X 'SHOTIZAM'2.0" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 15`-20` W 12`-15`3FIBBALSAM FIR / ABIES BALSAMEA6` HT.B&BAS SHOWNPIWWHITE PINE / PINUS STROBUS6` HT.B&BAS SHOWNARBTECHNY ARBORVITAE / THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 'TECHNY'6` HT.B&BAS SHOWN112115H 40`-65` W 15`-25`H 40'-60' W 20`-40`H 30`-35' W 10`-15`SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-PLP01.DWG 2219CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04/21/2025RMBRMBEJKPIONEER RIDGEOVERALL PRELIMINARYLANDSCAPE PLAN221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337PIONEER RIDGE12/13/24PIONEER RIDGE, LLC.04/21/202553774NICHOLAS T. MEYER© 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.###### or ##02/05/202504/07/202504/21/2025..REVISED SITE PLANREVISED SITE PLANREVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE..PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULELANDSCAPE PROVISIONS & REQUIREMENTSPRELIMINARYPLANS0'80'160'240'1" = 80'ABBREVIATIONS: B&B = BALLED AND BURLAPPED CAL. = CALIPER HT. = HEIGHT MIN. =MINIMUM O.C. = ON CENTER SP. = SPREAD QTY .= QUANTITY CONT. = CONTAINERNOTE: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. GROUNDCOVER LEGENDSTORMWATER NATIVESEED MIX 33-261(0.21 AC)EVERGREENTREEDECIDUOUSOVERSTORYSTREET TREEORNAMENTALTREEDECIDUOUSOVERSTORYTREEPLANT LEGENDGENERAL NOTES* ALL STREET BOULEVARDS TO BE SODDED.* ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDEDUNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.* ALL ROW DISTURBANCE TO BE SEEDED SOUTHERN SHORTGRASS ROADSIDE SEED MIX35-2211.TREE LOCATIONS AND SPACING ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON CONSTRUCTED PARKINGLOT, SIDEWALK, AND UTILITY LOCATIONS.2.PARKING LOT TREES SHALL BE PLANTED 5' FROM BACK OF CURB IN A LOCATION THAT DOESNOT INTERFERE WITH CURBSTOPS OR INDIVIDUAL SEWER & WATER CONNECTIONS.3.STREET TREES (ON THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY) SHALL BE PLANTED MIN 11' FROM BACK OFCURB OR SIDEWALK IN A LOCATION THAT DOES NOT INTERFERE WITH INDIVIDUAL SEWER,WATER CONNECTIONS, AND EASEMENTS.3.STREET TREES (ON THE PRIVATE RIGHT OF WAY) SHALL BE PLANTED MIN 9' FROM BACK OFCURB OR SIDEWALK IN A LOCATION THAT DOES NOT INTERFERE WITH INDIVIDUAL SEWER,WATER CONNECTIONS, AND EASEMENTS.4.NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEENCOMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.5.DECIDUOUS TREES SHOULD BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 5' OFF ANY UTILITY PIPE ANDCONIFEROUS TREES TREES SHOULD BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 15' OFF ANY UTILITY PIPE.6.NO TREE SHOULD BE LOCATED WITHIN 10' OF A HYDRANT OR 15' FROM A STREETLIGHT.7.NO DECIDUOUS TREE WITHIN 5' OF A SIDEWALK OR TRAIL AND NO CONIFEROUS TREESWITHIN 15' OF A PROPOSED SIDEWALK OR TRAIL.EXISTINGCONIFEROUS TREETO REMAINEXISTINGDECIDUOUS TREETO REMAIN323 ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆ ∆ ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆SXXXX POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POH POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHSTOSTOSTOSANSANSANSANSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STOSTOSTOWATWATWAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATSTOSTOSTOHHFOFOFOFMFMFMFMFMSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-PLP01.DWG 2220CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04/21/2025RMBRMBEJKPIONEER RIDGEPRELIMINARYLANDSCAPE PLAN &NOTES221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337PIONEER RIDGE12/13/24PIONEER RIDGE, LLC.04/21/202553774NICHOLAS T. MEYER© 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.###### or ##02/05/202504/07/202504/21/2025..REVISED SITE PLANREVISED SITE PLANREVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE..PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00PRELIMINARYPLANS0'50'100'150'1" = 50'1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TOVERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTSOR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL.2.ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS.3.NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEENCOMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.4.ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSIONOF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR.5.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THEGUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTENACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONEYEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING.6.ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADESHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS:ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES.ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING.CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTHRATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3.7.PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOSTCURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED.8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES.9.PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-INMATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY.10.PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THETOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWNTO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOTCOLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.11.OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAKAPART PEAT POTS.12.PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POORBRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES.13.WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST.14.STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONEYEAR.15.THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIORTO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEEDOF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS.16.BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECTTOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGERTHAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE.MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE,SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS.17.MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUBPLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. SHREDDEDHARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL ANDORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TOBE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND COLORED RED, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCHTO BE BUFF LIMESTONE, 1 1/2" TO 3" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL.ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUALWITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TOINSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE).18.EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY-VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGINGOR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES ANDSTAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEADAT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKSFOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TOCREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, ORRAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCHEXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE).19.ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PARKING LOTISLANDS TO BE SODDED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AROUND ALL TREES ANDSHRUBS. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OFLAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE.SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MN/DOTSPECIFICATIONS. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN.20.PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BEDESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOPDRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATIONSYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMALPROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRSTYEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR.ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THEGENERAL CONTRACTOR.21.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANTIS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDEWATER FOR CONTRACTOR.22.REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREASADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION.23.REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER.24.RAIN GARDEN NOTE: PROVIDE AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AT RAIN GARDENAREA SIDE SLOPES AFTER ALL PLANTING HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. BLANKET TO BE ONE SEASONGEOJUTE, MN/DOT CATEGORY 2 (STRAW 1S, WOOD FIBER 1S), OR APPROVED EQUAL. BLANKETTO BE OVERLAPPED BY 4" AND ANCHORED BY SOD STAPLES. PLACE BLANKET PERPENDICULARTO THE SLOPE. TRENCH IN EDGES OF BLANKET AREA TO PREVENT UNDER MINING. PROVIDESILT FENCE AT TOP OF SLOPE AS NEEDED. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO MATCH OTHERPROJECT PLANTING MULCH. PLACE 4" DEPTH OF MULCH AT ALL PLANTING AND EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET AREA (NO FILTER FABRIC). SEE RAIN GARDEN DETAIL FOR FURTHERINFORMATION. RAIN GARDEN TO PROVIDE PROPER INFILTRATION AND DRAINAGEREQUIREMENTS PER ENGINEERS APPROVAL.PLANTING NOTESEVERGREENTREEDECIDUOUSOVERSTORYSTREET TREEORNAMENTALTREEDECIDUOUSOVERSTORYTREEPLANT LEGENDEXISTINGCONIFEROUS TREETO REMAINEXISTINGDECIDUOUS TREETO REMAINGROUNDCOVER LEGENDSTORMWATER NATIVESEED MIX 33-261(0.7 AC)* ALL STREET BOULEVARDS TO BE SODDED.* ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDEDUNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.* ALL ROW DISTURBANCE TO BE SEEDED SOUTHERN SHORTGRASS ROADSIDE SEED MIX35-221324 ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆ ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆∆X XPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOH POHSTOWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHEX EOF22.504/21/202553774NICHOLAS T. MEYERSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-PLP01.DWG 2221CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04/21/2025RMBRMBEJKPIONEER RIDGEPRELIMINARYLANDSCAPE PLAN &DETAILS221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337PIONEER RIDGE12/13/24PIONEER RIDGE, LLC.© 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.###### or ##02/05/202504/07/202504/21/2025..REVISED SITE PLANREVISED SITE PLANREVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE..PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00PRELIMINARYPLANS0'50'100'150'1" = 50'PLANTING DETAILLAST REVISED:10/19/18DECIDUOUS TREEPLANTINGLA28N.T.S.SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOILOR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHINGTREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHEDSITE GRADE.REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FORNURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE.ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEARFINISHED GROUNDLINE.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE.BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILLSOIL.FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN.PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVERPLANT PITS - DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK.TREE WRAP MATERIAL FROM GROUNDLINEUPWARD TO FIRST BRANCHES, AS REQUIRED.PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES.PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER.GUYING AND STAKING, AS REQUIRED, FORONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS ANDCONIFEROUS TREES:TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.)OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OFSTAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND.STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINEDWOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATORPOSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANTAROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL.SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONGPOLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP.2XBALLDIAMETERSET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOILOR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHINGTREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITHFINISHED SITE GRADE.REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FORNURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE.ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEARFINISHED GROUNDLINE.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE.BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIEDBACKFILL SOIL.FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN.PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVERPLANT PITS - DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK.PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES.PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER.GUYING AND STAKING, AS REQUIRED, FORONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS ANDCONIFEROUS TREES:TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.)OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OFSTAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND.STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINEDWOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATORPOSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANTAROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL.SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONGPOLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP.2XBALLDIAMETERLAST REVISED:10/19/18EVERGREEN TREEPLANTINGLA29N.T.S.EVERGREENTREEDECIDUOUSOVERSTORYSTREET TREEORNAMENTALTREEDECIDUOUSOVERSTORYTREEPLANT LEGENDEXISTINGCONIFEROUS TREETO REMAINEXISTINGDECIDUOUS TREETO REMAINGROUNDCOVER LEGENDSTORMWATER NATIVESEED MIX 33-261(0.7 AC)* ALL STREET BOULEVARDS TO BE SODDED.* ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDEDUNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.* ALL ROW DISTURBANCE TO BE SEEDED SOUTHERN SHORTGRASS ROADSIDE SEED MIX35-221325 BLUFF CREEK DRIVEPIONEER TRA IL HI G H W A Y 2 1 2 STOSTOSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOPATIOGARAGEOLIVIA2-STORYPORCH12345678910111213141516171812345678910111213141516171819202121123STREET ASTREET B123456789101112131457.28 57.28 57.2867.6955.2555.2555.2555.2555.2555.2555.2555.2555.2555.25 PATIOGARAGEOLIVIA2-STORY1920OUTLOT A2OUTLOT B OUTLOT BOUTLOT B OUTLOT COUTLOT D31.5NWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWL NWL NWL NWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWLNWL0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.20.20.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.61.21.40.80.60.50.30.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.43.92.21.50.80.40.30.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.02.21.00.20.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.04.82.00.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.11.40.40.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.60.50.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.90.60.20.00.00.00.00.00.00.20.50.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.20.30.00.00.10.10.10.20.00.10.10.00.00.10.10.20.30.00.00.10.10.10.20.40.71.30.00.00.00.10.20.51.12.12.00.00.00.00.10.10.41.63.92.52.40.00.00.00.00.10.41.01.11.41.00.50.20.10.00.00.00.20.30.40.50.40.30.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.10.20.20.20.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.20.20.20.40.60.50.30.20.20.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.40.71.42.62.90.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.20.40.60.91.22.92.61.10.80.60.30.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.20.30.50.60.91.90.10.20.30.40.81.62.92.12.52.71.40.70.40.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.30.20.40.71.30.70.40.20.00.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.00.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.10.20.20.10.00.00.00.10.30.30.20.10.40.60.10.61.10.20.72.10.31.42.50.31.94.7ROADWAY CALCULATIONLALALALALALASHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0050930.00\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM PLANS\0050930C-LL01.DWG 2222CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA04/21/2025RMBRMBEJKPIONEER RIDGEPHOTOMETRIC PLAN221 RIVER RIDGE CIRCLE SBURNSVILLE, MN 55337PIONEER RIDGE12/13/244125704/21/2025RYAN BLUHMPIONEER RIDGE, LLC.PRELIMINARY PLANS© 2025 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com0'60'120'180'1" = 60'60'12' or 6'02/05/202504/07/202504/21/2025..REVISED SITE PLANREVISED SITE PLANREVISED GRADING ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE..PROJECT NUMBER: 0050930.00EXISTINGPROPOSEDCURB AND GUTTERPHOTOMETRIC LEGEND1.0 FOOT CANDLE ISOLINE0.5 FOOT CANDLE ISOLINE0.1 FOOT CANDLE ISOLINEPOLE MOUNT LIGHT FIXTURE326 327 328 Application: Requesting Preliminary Plat, Site Plan, and Rezoning (Planning Case #2025-01) Staff Report Date: April 23, 2025 Drafted By: Eric Maass, Community Development Director Joe Seidl, Water Resources Engineer Mackenze Grunig, Project Engineer Don Nutter, Fire Marshall Manuel Jordan, Forestry Consultant Planning Commission Review Date: February 18, 2025 City Council Review Date: April 21, 2025 SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The Applicant is requesting a preliminary plat, site plan, and rezoning approval to subdivide the property located generally at the intersection of Pioneer Trail and Bluff Creek Drive into 40 townhomes, which are grouped in structures of three, four, or five townhomes and 14 detached townhomes for a total of 54 homes. The remaining two lots consist of common area surrounding the townhomes as well as private stormwater ponds which would be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. The Planning Commission is requested to review the preliminary plat and rezoning proposals. LOCATION: Unassigned property address PID: 25.0270010 PROPOSED MOTION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation recommending approval of the requested rezoning of the property as outlined by staff and recommending preliminary plat and site plan approval for a townhome development consisting of 40 attached townhomes and 14 detached townhomes subject to the conditions included in the staff report dated April 23, 2025. 329 Page 2 of 25 APPLICANT: Pioneer Ridge LLC “Applicant” PROPERTY OWNER: Pioneer Ridge LLC PRESENT ZONING: Unassigned - Right of way 2040 LAND USE PLAN: Residential – Medium Density (4.1 – 8.0 units/net acre) ACREAGE: 11.75 Acres (gross). 11.03 Acres (net) DENSITY: 4.60 units/acre (gross). 4.90 units/acre (net) LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city’s discretion in approving or denying a rezoning is based on whether the requested zoning district is an eligible zoning district based on the land use designation for the property as identified by the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The requested rezoning must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. This is a legislative decision. The city’s discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the city must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The city’s discretion in approving or denying a Site Plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the city must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT The Applicant held a neighborhood meeting on January 14th, 2024. This neighborhood meeting was attended by approximately 30 attendees. As part of the event, attendees were asked to share what they were hoping to learn about, what they were nervous about, and what they were happy to have learned about from attending the open house. Attendees hoped to learn about… the proposed exterior design of the homes, drainage plans, project timeline, openness to amending plans, options for privacy, parking, and construction traffic. Primary concerns of attendees included… proximity of townhomes to existing homes, loss of previously undeveloped land, wildlife, and lack of buffer between the proposed homes and existing homes. 330 Page 3 of 25 Attendees were happy to learn that… the townhomes are not 3 stories in height, and that nothing is final and that the development team was open to changes. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet as well as all property owners within the Pioneer Pass neighborhood. This same mailing list was used for mailing invitations for the neighborhood meeting held by the Applicant. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivision, Chapter 20, Article X, “A-2” Agricultural Estate District Chapter 20, Article XIV-1, “RLM” Residential Low and Medium Density District Chapter 20, Article XXIV-2, “R-8” Mixed Medium Density Residential District Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The project is proposed to be located on land that was formerly right-of-way, which had been acquired by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). MnDOT sold the land at auction, and the subsequent owner of the property is the Applicant. The Applicant is proposing the subdivision of 11.75 acres of property which is guided for Medium Density Residential into 54 homes consisting of 40 attached townhomes and 14 detached townhomes, referred to as “villas” as well as 4 outlots consisting of roadways, stormwater infrastructure, and open space to be preserved. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DISTRICTS • Wetland Protection – Two incidental wetlands on the property. • Bluff Protection – There are two bluff areas in the northeast corner of the property. • Shoreland Management – Not within a shoreland management district. • Floodplain Overlay – Not within a floodplain overlay district. 331 Page 4 of 25 LAND USE DESIGNATION The property is assigned as both Residential Medium Density and Office designations by the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. This dual designation affords the property greater flexibility because it is eligible for either Residential Medium Density zoning districts or zoning districts identified as eligible under the “office” designation by the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Residential Medium Density properties must be developed at a density of between 4 to 8 housing units per net acre. In reviewing the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the Subject Property held the same land use designation then. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan was adopted in November 2008. REQUEST FOR REZONING APPROVAL When considering land use applications to rezone a property, the City must adopt findings of fact in support or in denial of such an application. A rezoning request is considered a legislative action by the city. Therefore, the City has discretion in approving or denying a rezoning ordinance, but the decision of the City must include findings of fact. The city utilizes the following standards when considering applications for rezoning. a) The proposed rezoning is/is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. b) The proposed zoning will/will not be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. c) The proposed zoning does/does not conform to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed zoning will/will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed zoning can/can not be accommodated with existing and planned public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use within the zoning district is/is not within the capabilities of the streets serving the property. LAND USE – ZONING CONSISTENCY The following zoning districts are consistent with “Residential Medium Density” land use: “R-4” Mixed Low Density Residential, “RLM” Residential Low Medium Density Residential, “R-8” Mixed Medium Density Residential, and “PUD-R” Planned Unit Development Residential. The following is a summary of the proposed rezoning for the site: • Lots 1-14, Block 1 rezoned to “RLM” • Lots 1-21, Block 3 rezoned to “R-8” • Lots 1-21, Block 2 rezoned to “R-8” • Outlot A – rezoned to “A2” • Outlot B – rezoned to “R-8” 332 Page 5 of 25 • Outlot C – rezoned to “A2” • Outlot D – rezoned to “A2” The RLM district is intended to provide for single-family attached or detached residential development on land guided residential-low or medium density in the city's Comprehensive Plan. The "RLM" District is intended to be used where large areas of upland will be preserved or created as permanent open space to balance the higher lot coverage permitted on individual lots. The R-8 district is intended to provide for single-family attached and multifamily residential development at a maximum net density of eight dwelling units per acre. The A-2 district is intended to provide for the preservation of rural character while respecting development patterns by allowing single-family residential development. “Public and private parks and open space” are permitted use within the A2 district. SURROUNDING ZONING Direction Zoning Designation North Residential Low and Medium Density Residential(RLM) South Right of way (Pioneer Trail / CSAH 14) 333 Page 6 of 25 West Right of way/open space (Bluff Creek Drive) East Right of way/open space (Hwy 212) Upon review of the rezoning request, staff makes the following findings of fact: a) The proposed rezoning is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The requested rezoning of the property to a mixture of RLM, R-8, and Parks – Open Space are consistent with the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan which guides the area for Medium Density Residential with a minimum density of 4.1 units per acre and a maximum density of 8.0 units per acre. b) The proposed zoning will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. The immediately adjacent properties are primarily right of way and open space with low density residential to the north and medium density residential designation of surrounding developments. The proposed rezonings are compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. c) The proposed zoning does conform to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed zoning designations are consistent and comply with the performance standards within the city’s zoning ordinance. d) The proposed zoning will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. The proposed housing zoning designations are consistent and comparable to surrounding housing zoning designations and therefore will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed zoning can be accommodated with existing and planned public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. The proposed development has analyzed existing public services and there is adequate capacity to serve the proposed zoning designations and which will not overburden the city’s service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use within the zoning district is within the capabilities of the streets serving the property. 334 Page 7 of 25 The City has reviewed a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) and the proposed development and zoning designations are within the capabilities of the streets serving the property. REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL - SUBDIVISION REVIEW When considering land use applications to subdivide a property, the City must adopt findings of fact in support or in denial of such an application. An application for subdivision is considered a quasi-judicial action and the City's discretion in approving or denying the subdivision application is based on whether or not the proposed subdivision is consistent with the City’s ordinances. The City utilizes the following standards when considering applications for subdivisions. a) The proposed subdivision is/is not consistent with the zoning ordinance. b) The proposed subdivision is/is not consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the City's Comprehensive Plan; c) The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and stormwater drainage are/are not suitable for the proposed development; d) The proposed subdivision does/does not make adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by the subdivision ordinance; e) The proposed subdivision will/will not cause significant environmental damage subject to compliance with the conditions of approval; f) The proposed subdivision will/will not conflict with easements of record; g) The proposed subdivision is/is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1) Lack of adequate stormwater drainage. 2) Lack of adequate roads. 3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4) Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. The Applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval to subdivide the property at and around Bluff Creek Dr & Pioneer Trl in the NE corner. Staff reviewed construction plans developed by 335 Page 8 of 25 Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated February 5, 2025, and updated April 7, 2025 and updated April 21, 2025. The plans provided show construction of a private street, private lift station, and sanitary sewer, 14 detached townhomes and 40 attached townhomes, public water main, and an addition to the existing publicly owned storm sewer pond. Lot Area Compliance Tables: Detached Townhomes (RLM) Required (minimum) Proposed Lot Area 5,445 sf (average) 7,345 sf (average) Lot Frontage 30 feet 54 feet Lot Depth 100 feet 109 feet As currently proposed, all lots meet the minimum lot area, lot width, and lot depths required by their proposed zoning designations. Outlot A is shown for purposes of expanding an existing publicly owned stormwater pond and will be required to be deeded to the city for the continued purposes of stormwater management. Outlot B is shown for the proposed private roadways, which will serve as access to the proposed attached and detached townhomes and guest parking spaces. The city will not maintain private roadways or private guest parking spaces. Outlot C consists of bluff areas and shall be dedicated to the city for the purposes of preservation. Outlot C will be required to be deeded to the city at the time of final plat. Once owned by the city, Outlot C will be used solely for the purposes of preservation and open space. Outlot D is partially within the Bluff Creek Overlay District and the city has goals related to preservation at the time of subdivision. This outlot will be required to be deeded to the city at the time of final plat. Once owned by the city, Outlot D will be used solely for the purpose of preservation and open space. STREETS AND INTERSECTIONS The project proposes a series of private roads. City Code section 18-57(b) outlines the required minimum width of right-of-way and minimum roadway pavement width for new development. Multifamily projects with a density equal to or greater than 4 units per acre have a required Attached Townhomes (R-8) Required (minimum) Proposed Lot Area 1,800 sf 2,368 Lot Frontage 30 feet 32 feet Lot Depth 60 feet 74 feet 336 Page 9 of 25 right-of-way minimum width of 40’ and a minimum pavement width of 24’. The project proposes a right-of-way width of 40’ and a pavement width of 24’ and, as a result, adheres to city code requirements. The project proposes an access point onto Bluff Creek Drive and an access point onto Pioneer Trail. Access onto Pioneer Trail is determined by Carver County, as it is under the jurisdiction of Carver County. Carver County Public Works issued a staff report for the proposed development and those comments have been included with this report. Based on the Traffic Impact Analysis, the existing hill on the southwest side of the proposed development is required to be graded back to improve sight lines for traffic seeking to turn south onto Bluff Creek Drive. The Traffic Impact Analysis found the following: • All intersections were anticipated to operate within acceptable levels of service in the AM and PM peak hours. • Left and right turn storage bays are anticipated to have adequate storage for the full buildout scenario. • Grading the exiting hill back from the roadway is required to provide the necessary sight distance for the left turn from minor road or for the right turn from the minor road. WETLANDS On May 6, 2024, Westwood Professional Services submitted a wetland delineation and joint permit application. The City of Chanhassen, in its role as the local governing unit (LGU) overseeing the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), approved the delineation. The Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP), which includes representatives from the city, Watershed District, MN Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and Carver County Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD), is responsible for reviewing wetland applications, including wetland types and boundaries, as part of the WCA process. The delineation identified two small wetlands and one watercourse onsite. The Applicant provided documentation showing that these water resources were created by grading activities related to nearby developments and roadway projects. After reviewing the application and grading plans, the TEP concluded that the wetlands were incidental and not subject to WCA or city regulation. Both wetlands were linked to ditched areas excavated to manage stormwater runoff. The project plans show the watercourse being realigned to facilitate the roadway construction and to reduce steep slopes which have resulted in the severe erosion of the natural channel. GRADING & DRAINAGE The project site is located north of Pioneer Trail, east of Bluff Creek Drive, and south of Hemlock Way. It is currently undeveloped, primarily consisting of open prairie, with more forested areas to the east around the bluffs. There is an existing stormwater basin within a city-owned outlot along Bluff Creek Drive. The site is bordered to the north by single-family residences, to the east by bluffs and Bluff Creek, and to the south by County and MNDOT Right of Way. The existing 337 Page 10 of 25 stormwater basin collects drainage from the development to the north and portions of the site. About half of the site drains to the northeast down the bluff, with runoff ultimately flowing into Bluff Creek. The southern portion of the site drains under Pioneer Trail through a 24” culvert or into a swale at the southwest corner of the site, at the intersection of Pioneer Trail and Bluff Creek Drive. Under the proposed plan, the site would be mass graded to allow for the construction of roads, utilities, and homes. The proposed drainage patterns will be similar to existing conditions. The northeastern portion of the site will continue to flow down the bluff toward Bluff Creek. The majority of the homes and roadways will drain to a water reuse pond located at the northeast corner, which will outlet down the bluff to Bluff Creek. A small portion of the roadway and homes will drain into an expanded version of the existing stormwater basin along Bluff Creek Drive. Runoff from the southeast corner of the site will be captured by an 18” reinforced concrete pipe, which will outlet into the existing 24” pipe that carries stormwater south. Overflow from the 18” pipe will flow southwest toward the intersection of Pioneer Trail and Bluff Creek Drive where it drains to County Right of Way. The proposed design will change how stormwater exits the site, particularly through the stormwater reuse pond outlet in the northeast. This pond and outlet will collect and convey stormwater in a more concentrated flow when compared to current conditions. Located at the top of the bluff, the concentrated flow combined with the steep, unstable bluff areas may cause erosion issues. Therefore, the applicant must develop a better solution to address this, such as routing the pond outlet through a storm sewer that conveys stormwater down the bluff. Additionally, the proposed design increases runoff rates at the southwest corner of the site, near the intersection of Pioneer Trail and Bluff Creek Drive. The runoff rate from the site cannot exceed current conditions, as such the Applicant must revise the design. Additional storage in the swale could help slow down the water leaving the site. The Applicant must resubmit a design with the final plat that ensures discharge rates match or are below those of existing conditions. Since the project alters how stormwater is discharged to the County and MNDOT Right of Way, the Applicant must obtain all necessary permits from Carver County and MNDOT. Conditional approval from all permitting agencies must be provided with the final plat application. The proposed design includes a drainage ditch along the northern edge of the property to direct runoff to two BMPs located on the east and west sides. The ditch is set at a 2% slope, the typical minimum needed to ensure proper drainage in turfgrass areas. However, it appears to compete for space with screening trees, which increases the likelihood of root intrusion and flow obstruction. This could result in nuisance drainage issues, such as consistently wet yards— particularly on Lots 13 and 14, where space near the watercourse is especially limited. While the applicant’s revised design shows some improvement, it still poses a higher risk of drainage problems. Therefore, the applicant must continue to work with staff to further improve drainage in the ditched areas along the northern portion of the property. 338 Page 11 of 25 EROSION CONTROL The proposed development will impact one (1) acre of disturbance and will, therefore, be subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). A Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) was included in the preliminary plat submittal. The SWPPP is a required submittal element for final plat review along with the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) in accordance with Section 19- 145 of City Ordinance. No earth disturbing activities may occur until an approved SWPPP is developed. This SWPPP shall be a standalone document consistent with the NPDES Construction Permit and shall contain all required elements of the permit. The SWPPP will need to be updated as the plans are finalized, when the contractor and their sub-contractors are identified and as other conditions change. An approved SWPPP shall be submitted prior to recording the final plat. All erosion control shall be installed and inspected prior to initiation of site grading activities. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT Article VII, Chapter 19 of the City Code outlines the stormwater management development standards. Section 19-141 specifies that "these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions, and water management features." These standards include runoff abstraction and water quality treatment, requiring the removal of 90% of total suspended solids (TSS) and 60% of total phosphorus (TP). The proposed project is located within the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) and is subject to its rules and regulations. A RPBCWD permit will be required for final plat approval. A Stormwater Management Report, dated August 16, 2024, was submitted for review to confirm that all stormwater management requirements, including rate control, volume abstraction, and water quality, are being met. The proposed site plans include a stormwater pond and an associated water reuse system for irrigating the green spaces within the development. Additionally, the Applicant proposes to enlarge the existing city-owned stormwater wet pond onsite. The Applicant submitted a permit application to the watershed district at the same time as the city's preliminary plat application. Design modifications are necessary to comply with all applicable rules. Therefore, the Applicant must provide conditional approval from the watershed district as part of the final plat application. Additionally, the Applicant must submit final versions of all modeling (HydroCAD and MIDS) and the updated Stormwater Management Report to address outstanding comments and confirm that rate, volume, and water quality requirements are met before the final site plan approval. The outlet for the stormwater reuse pond is located at the top of the bluff. The Applicant should extend the outlet with storm sewer further down the bluff to a less erosion-prone area. The proposed water reuse basin must also allow for maintenance access to the pond inlets and outlet, and an operation and maintenance agreement must be in place. The Applicant is 339 Page 12 of 25 required to collaborate with staff to optimize the stormwater design, addressing concerns related to future maintenance and erosion. The design includes two proposed best management practices (BMPs) located on private property. The reuse pond BMP, situated on the northeast side of the site, is intended solely to treat stormwater from private property. Therefore, it should be privately owned and maintained. The expanded BMP pond, on the other hand, will manage both public and private stormwater. To clarify future maintenance responsibilities, it is recommended that the expanded pond be separated from the public pond. The stormwater design is still being finalized, and there may be adjustments to the BMPs on site, including changes in number, size, or type, to meet stormwater regulations. As a result, the Applicant will work with staff to optimize the stormwater design and determine the ownership of the stormwater management facilities for the development. The stormwater infrastructure for the development will be privately owned and maintained. A maintenance plan for any proposed best management practices (BMPs) will be required. The plan should include a maintenance schedule, identify the responsible party, and describe how the system will be cleaned as needed. The Applicant must submit a stormwater operations and maintenance plan as part of the final plat submittal. Additionally, the Applicant will be required to enter into a stormwater agreement with the city for any privately owned stormwater infrastructure onsite. LANDSCAPING The applicant for the Pioneer Ridge development submitted tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations. Total upland area (excl wetlands, bluff) 11.03 acres Baseline canopy coverage 29% or 3.22 Minimum canopy coverage required 25% or 2.76 acres Proposed tree preservation 9% or 1.02 acres The developer does not meet minimum canopy coverage for the site; therefore the applicant must bring the canopy coverage on site up to the 25% minimum. The difference between the required coverage and the remaining coverage is multiplied by 1.2 for total area to be replaced. One tree is valued at 1,089 SF. Minimum required 2.76 acres Less canopy preserved 1.02 acres Minimum canopy coverage to be replaced 1.74 acres Multiplied by 1.2 2.09 acres or 91,040.4 sf Divided by 1089sf =Total number of trees to be planted: 84 trees 340 Page 13 of 25 The applicant has submitted a landscape plan showing a total of 228 trees to be planted in the development. Proposed Deciduous trees 79 trees Proposed Evergreen trees 146 trees Proposed Ornamental trees 3 trees Bufferyard ‘B’ as defined in City Code Chapter 20-1176, plantings are required between the development and Bluff Creek Dr. as well as Pioneer Trail. Bufferyard ‘B,’ as defined in City Code Chapter 20-1176, plantings is also required between the proposed development and the Pioneer Pass development to the north as the development site is guided for Medium Density Residential and the adjacent property to the north is guided as Low Density Residential. Required plantings / landscape area Proposed Bufferyard Plantings Bufferyard B – West prop. line, 351’ 15’ multiplier 7 Overstory trees 14 Understory trees 21 Shrubs 10 evergreens (overstory) 5 deciduous (overstory) 0 understory trees shown 0 shrubs shown Bufferyard B - South prop. Line, - 1,086’ 25’ multiplier 13 Overstory Trees 26 Understory trees 39 Shrubs 44 evergreens (overstory) 20 deciduous (overstory) 0 understory trees shown 0 shrubs shown Bufferyard B - East prop line- 349’ 15’ multiplier 7 Overstory Trees 14 Understory trees 21 Shrubs 14 evergreens (overstory) 6 deciduous (overstory) 0 understory trees shown 0 shrubs shown Bufferyard B - North prop. Line- 1016’ 20’ multiplier 16 Overstory trees 33 Understory trees 49 Shrubs 71 evergreens (overstory) 6 deciduous (overstory) 0 understory trees shown 0 shrubs shown In total, 260 buffer plantings (43 overstory trees, 87 understory trees, and 130 shrubs) would be required. The applicant is showing 176 overstory trees, 0 understory trees, and 0 shrubs. The buffer plantings are intended to provide a visual buffer between two developed areas. The proposed use of extensive evergreens (pines, spruces, and firs) combined with complementary deciduous trees provides a significant visual buffer greater than the minimum buffer outlined above. Due to the unique nature of this development, staff assessment is that 341 Page 14 of 25 the proposed extensive overstory tree plantings are a suitable alternative to the lack of understory plantings, as they focus on neighborhood screening concerns. Staff recommends planting in between the overstory tree plantings along the property perimeters to accomplish the required shrub plantings so that as the evergreen and deciduous trees get taller, there will be a lower level of visual buffering. Applicant to update the landscaping plan to provide buffer plantings (shrubs) along the western property line. The applicant shall indicate plant codes on the plan to correlate to specific quantities for each species to ensure that the landscape plan meets the city’s requirements for species diversity. As updates are made to the landscaping plan, the Applicant is to be mindful of the city’s tree species diversity requirements. No more than 10% of the trees may be from any one tree species, no more than 20% of the trees may be from any one genus, and no more than 30% from any one family. Based on the plans submitted and staff’s analysis of the proposed site plan and its conformance to City ordinances, staff makes the following findings: a) The proposed site plan is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted. b) The proposed site plan is consistent with the site plan review requirements. c) The proposed site plan preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas. d) The proposed site plan creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development. e) The proposed site plan creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1) An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; 2) The amount and location of open space and landscaping; 3) Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and 342 Page 15 of 25 4) Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. f) The proposed site plan protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provisions for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air, and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations that may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. g) The proposed site plan maintains an acceptable road system level of service. SUBDIVISION REVIEW FINDINGS Based on the plans submitted and staff’s analysis of the proposed subdivision and its conformance to City ordinances, staff makes the following findings: a) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance. The subdivision as proposed adheres to the city’s zoning ordinances for the RLM and R-8 zoning districts and does not require variances to the city’s ordinances. b) The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans, including but not limited to the City's Comprehensive Plan; The subdivision as proposed complies with the City’s Comprehensive Plan as well as applicable city, county, and regional plans. c) The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and stormwater drainage are suitable for the proposed development; The applicant has prepared the necessary engineered drawings and design to establish that the topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and stormwater drainage are suitable for the proposed development. d) The proposed subdivision does make adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by the subdivision ordinance; The Applicant has made adequate provisions for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by the subdivision ordinance. 343 Page 16 of 25 e) The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage subject to compliance with the conditions of approval; The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage based on its compliance to the proposed conditions of approval. f) The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; The Applicant has provided the necessary information to support that the proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. g) The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1) Lack of adequate stormwater drainage. 2) Lack of adequate roads. 3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4) Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. The proposed subdivision has adequate stormwater drainage, roads, sanitary sewer systems, and adequate off-site public improvement and support systems. REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW – ZONING COMPLIANCE The Applicant is requesting site plan approval for a multifamily residential development consisting of 40 attached townhomes, 14 detached townhomes, and private roadways. Below is an analysis of setbacks and height restrictions applicable to the proposed development based on the two proposed zoning designations. Detached Townhomes (RLM) Building Setback Required (minimum) Proposed Front yard 20 feet 20 feet Side yard building separation 15 feet (10’ garage side, 5’ house side) 15 feet Rear yard 30 feet 30 feet Building height Three stories / 35 feet < 35 feet 344 Page 17 of 25 Attached Townhomes (R-8) Building Setback Required Proposed Front yard 20 feet 21 feet Front yard (corner) 20 feet 40 feet Side yard building separation 20 feet (not applicable to common walls in multifamily dwelling units) 21 feet Side yard 20 feet 42 feet Building height Three stories / 35 feet < 35 feet As shown, the detached and attached townhomes adhere to the applicable minimum setbacks and height restrictions based on the proposed zoning designations. SIGNAGE Project or neighborhood signage, if incorporated into the development, will require separate permitting. OVERHEAD POWERLINE UTILITY The Applicant is proposing to relocate the existing overhead powerlines. The Applicant will coordinate the powerline relocation with Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative. PARKING The plan set shows 21 guest parking spaces. City Code requires at least 1 guest parking space for every four dwelling units for multifamily residential developments. Based on the 40 attached townhomes and 14 detached townhomes, 14 guest parking spaces are required. The 21 proposed parking spaces exceed the minimum required by city code and are appropriately placed throughout the proposed development ARCHITECTURE The City establishes design standards for multifamily developments which are outlined in City Code Division 20-XXIII-9 Design Standards for Multifamily Developments. Section 20-1088 describes the requirements for architectural style. 1. It states that “Architectural style shall not be restricted. Evaluation of the appearance of a project shall be based on the quality of its design and in relationship to its surroundings, guided by the provisions of this section. Site characteristics to be evaluated for this purpose include building and landscaping, colors, textures, shapes, massing of rhythms of building components and detail, height of roof line, setback and orientation. Designs that are incompatible with their surroundings or intentionally bizarre or exotic are not acceptable. 345 Page 18 of 25 2. Monotony of design, both within projects and between adjacent projects and its surroundings, is prohibited. Variation in detail, form, and siting shall provide visual interest. Site characteristics that may be used for this purpose include building and landscaping, colors, textures, shapes, massing of rhythms of building components and detail, height of roof line, setback and orientation. 3. All building shall have a minimum of 20 percent of accent material. Accent material may include brick, stone cut face block or shakes. The use of any EFIS shall not be on the first story of any building or one story in height. Sophia and Amelia attached townhomes – 44% accent materials on end units and 38% accent materials on interior units based on the front elevation. Applicant to update to include full surface area of the structures. Jasmine and Isla attached townhomes – 48% accent materials on end units and 62% accent materials on interior units based on the front elevation. Applicant to update to include full surface area of the structures. The Applicant has provided a series of renderings of possible detached townhomes to be built on the property. The detached nature allows for greater flexibility between individual homes. The detached townhomes are required to adhere to the 20% accent material requirement as the attached townhomes. Compliance of 20% accent material of the detached townhomes will be verified at the time of building permit application, as a result of the individual design being flexible compared to the attached townhomes, which have specific units proposed, and those elevations and materials have been reviewed as part of the current land use application. - Remainder of page left intentionally blank - 346 Page 19 of 25 Proposed Attached Townhomes – “Amelia and Sophia” Amelia and Sophia Units - Architectural Rendering Front Elevation Side Elevations Rear Elevation 347 Page 20 of 25 Proposed Attached Townhomes – “Isla and Jasmine” Isla and Jasmine Units - Architectural Rendering Front Elevations Side Elevations Rear Elevations 348 Page 21 of 25 Proposed Potential Detached Townhome Renderings 349 Page 22 of 25 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the requested site plan subject to the conditions outlined by staff listed below. STAFF REVIEW CONDITIONS PLANNING: 1. Architectural drawings for the attached townhomes provided accent material percentages based on the front elevation only. City code states “all buildings shall have a minimum of 20 percent of accent material”. Applicant to update the figure to show that accent materials meet the 20 percent material threshold for the whole building. 2. Applicant to ensure the rear of attached townhomes have variation in material treatment as the rear elevations are visible to the public right of way. 3. Staff will review the building elevations of detached townhomes at the building permit to ensure conformance with the 20% accent material requirement. Accent material may include brick, stone cut face block, or shakes. 4. Outlots A, C, and D, Pioneer Ridge, shall be deeded to the City of Chanhassen. FORESTRY 1. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed around existing trees to be saved prior to any construction activities and remain installed until completion. Do not use a silt fence to delineate tree preservation 2. All trees shall be planted outside of the street right-of-way. 3. The applicant shall indicate plant codes on the plan to correlate to specific quantities for each species to ensure that the landscape plan meets the city’s requirements for species diversity. No more than 10% of the trees may be from any one tree species, no more than 20% of the trees may be from any one genus, and no more than 30% from any one family. 4. Applicant must include the condition of each tree as part of the tree survey. 5. Update the landscape plan to incorporate shrub planting in between the overstory tree plantings along the property perimeters to accomplish the required shrub plantings. 6. Update the landscaping plan to provide buffer planting (49 shrubs) along the western property line. ENGINEERING: 1. The developer shall enter into Encroachment Agreements for all private improvements located within public drainage and utility easements or the public right-of-way, as approved by the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Any previously recorded easements located within the proposed public right-of-way or proposed public drainage and utility easements must be vacated prior to or concurrently with the final plat. 350 Page 23 of 25 3. The developer and their engineer must amend the construction plans to fully address staff comments and concerns. Final construction plans are subject to review and approval by staff prior to the recording of the final plat. 4. Final plans shall include the 2025 City Standard Details and Specifications. 5. Provide a drainage and utility easement over drainage swales where applicable. 6. Any retaining walls associated with this project shall be privately owned or maintained by the Homeowners Association (HOA). 7. Based on the Traffic Impact Analysis, the existing hill on the southwest corner of the proposed development should be graded back to improve sight lines. Revise final plans accordingly. 8. Label the proposed lift station as privately owned. 9. The grading around Lot 1 does not tie into the existing 930’ contour. Revise accordingly. 10. Detail plates shall be formatted as two rows by four columns per page. Pedestrian ramps shall be formatted as two rows by two columns to improve readability. 11. Streetlights shall be owned and maintained by Xcel Energy. Provide the agreement for documentation when complete. Luminaires shall meet City standards. 12. The developer shall verify sight distance triangles. 13. The applicant shall provide a schedule for necessary private utility relocations. 14. Final plans shall show removals and design for connection to the existing sanitary sewer. 15. All publicly owned and maintained utilities shall be located within a designated Drainage and Utility Easement, which must be clearly identified and shown on the final plats. WATER RESOURCES: 1. The developer shall enter into a development contract with the City and provide necessary financial security to guarantee compliance with the terms of subdivision approval and construction of infrastructure onsite. 2. It is the developer’s responsibility to ensure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project (i.e. Carver County, MCWD, Board of Water and Soil Resources, MnDOT, etc.) prior to the commencement of construction activities. 3. The developer and their Engineer shall work with City staff in amending the construction plans, dated December 13, 2025 prepared by Westwood Professional Services., to fully satisfy construction plan comments and concerns. Final construction plans will be subject to review and approval by staff prior to recording final plat. 4. The applicant shall secure condition approval from the watershed district prior to submitting the final plat application to the City. Verification of conditional approval shall be provided with the final plat application. 5. The applicant shall secure condition approval from the MnDOT and Caver County prior to submitting the final plat application to the City. Verification of conditional approval shall be provided with the final plat application. 6. The revised design shall address staff’s concerns with the northern drainage ditch, concentrated drainage down the bluff, and the discharge rates leaving the site. A memo describing the ultimate design solution may be required as determined by the City Engineer. 351 Page 24 of 25 7. The applicant shall enter into an operations and maintenance agreement with the city for all privately owned stormwater infrastructure onsite. A draft maintenance plan shall be submitted with the final plat application. An HOA shall be created for the purpose of maintaining the stormwater infrastructure onsite. BUILDING: 1. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. 2. Building permits must be obtained before beginning any construction. 3. Private retaining walls, if present, more than four feet high, measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. Retaining walls, if present, under four feet in height require a zoning permit. 4. A building permit must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site. 5. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. FIRE: 1. All private roads shall be signed as “No Parking” at any time and apply to both sides of the private roads. The same shall apply to fire apparatus turn arounds, they too shall be signed as no parking. CARVER COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS: 1. Peak stormwater discharge to the southwest existing storm sewer is shown as increasing from 7.6 cfs to 10.7 cfs. This increase should be mitigated to match the existing condition as closely as possible. 2. The catch basin on CSAH 14must be relocated to the curb line. 3. We strongly prefer the storm sewer be located in the right-of-way to minimize disturbances to private property in the event of maintenance. 4. Plans must incorporate the existing trail north of CSAH 14. ADA accessibility must be maintained, including across the proposed access. 5. Plans must include a typical cross-section of CSAH 14. 6. Plans must include cross-sections demonstrating how the proposed new pavement will tie into the existing cross slope. Cross sections must include dimensions, curb type, and material specifications to match the existing pavement. 7. Plan must include pavement striping and marking changes and any additional signage required. 8. Please provide turning movements for the largest expected vehicle, to be determined by the City of Chanhassen. 9. Right turn lane tape should be 1:15, with the shift of the trail to the north matched to maintain separation. 352 Page 25 of 25 10. Curb widening for the right turn lane should behind at the bridge approach panel for consistency with other County projects. 11. The traffic island controlling right-in/right-out to the development should be replaced with a center median on CSAH 14. Please direct the applicant to Carver County Public Works staff to discuss design specifics. 12. This project will require grading and access permits from Carver County. 353 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION IN RE: Application of Brandl Anderson Homes – Planning Case No. 2025-01, Pioneer Ridge. Request to Rezone existing Right Of Wayto R-8 Mixed Medium Density Residential District (R-8), Residential Low and Medium Density (RLM), and A-2 Agricultural Estate District (A-2)Subdivision and Site Plan Approval for a multi-family residential subdivision for 40 attached townhomes and 14 detached townhomes. On February 18, 2025, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Brandl Anderson Homes for a multifamily residential development. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed development, preceded by a published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently identified as right of way. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential–Medium Density uses. 3. The legal description of the property is: (See Exhibit A) 4. REZONING FINDINGS a) The proposed rezoning is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The requested rezoning of the property to a mixture of RLM, R-8, and Parks – Open Space are consistent with the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan which guides the area for Medium Density Residential with a minimum density of 4.1 units per acre and a maximum density of 8.0 units per acre. b) The proposed zoning will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. The immediately adjacent properties are primarily right of way and open space with low density residential to the north and medium density residential designation of surrounding developments. The proposed rezonings are compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. c) The proposed zoning does conform to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. 354 2 The proposed zoning designations are consistent and comply with the performance standards within the city’s zoning ordinance. d) The proposed zoning will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. The proposed housing zoning designations are consistent and comparable to surrounding housing zoning designations and therefore will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed zoning can be accommodated with existing and planned public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. The proposed development has analyzed existing public services and there is adequate capacity to serve the proposed zoning designations and which will not overburden the city’s service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use within the zoning district is within the capabilities of the streets serving the property. The City has reviewed a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) and the proposed development and zoning designations are within the capabilities of the streets serving the property. 5.SUBDIVISION FINDINGS a) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance. The subdivision as proposed adheres to the city’s zoning ordinances for the RLM and R-8 zoning districts and does not require variances to the citys ordinances. b) The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the City's Comprehensive Plan; The subdivision as proposed complies with the City’s Comprehensive Plan as well as applicable city, county, and regional plans. c) The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and stormwater drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Theapplicant has prepared the necessary engineered drawings and design to establish that the topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and stormwater drainage are suitable for the proposed development. 355 3 d) The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by the subdivision ordinance; The Applicant has made adequate provisions for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by the subdivision ordinance. e) The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage subject to compliance with the conditions of approval; The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage based on its compliance to the proposed conditions of approval. f) The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; The Applicant has provided the necessary information to support that the proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. g) The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1) Lack of adequate stormwater drainage. 2) Lack of adequate roads. 3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4) Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. The proposed subdivision has adequate stormwater drainage, roads, sanitary sewer systems, and adequate off-site public improvement and support systems. 6.SITE PLAN FINDINGS a) Is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted. b) Is consistent with the site plan review requirements. c) Preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas. d) Creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development. e) Creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 356 4 a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. f) Protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. g) Maintains an acceptable road system level of service. 7. The planning report #2025-01 dated April 23, 2025, prepared by Eric Maass, et al, is incorporated herein. DECISION The City Council adopts the attached findings of fact and recommendation that the City Council approve an Ordinance rezoning portions of the subject property to Mixed Medium Density Residential District (R-8), Residential Low and Medium Density District (RLM), and Agricultural Estate District (A-2) as shown in Exhibit B and grants Preliminary Plat and Site Plan approval for a multi-family residential subdivision for 40 attached townhomes and 14 detached townhome. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this _____ day of _____________, 202_. CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL BY:___________________________________ Its Mayor BY:_ __________________________________ Its City Manager 357 5 EXHIBIT A That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 27, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, shown as Parcel 60 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat Numbered 10-20 and Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10- 43 as the same is on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Carver County, Minnesota; Which lies northwesterly, northerly and northeasterly, of Line 1 described below: Line 1: Commencing at Right of Way Boundary Corner B14 as shown on said Plat No. 10-20; thence southwesterly on an azimuth of 218 degrees 08 minutes 53 seconds along the boundary of said plat for 890.93 feet to Right of Way Boundary Corner B13 and the point of beginning of Line 1 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 210 degrees 36 minutes 52 seconds for 435.09 feet; thence on an azimuth of 202 degrees 57 minutes 17 seconds for 173.07 feet; thence on an azimuth of 267 degrees 24 minutes 40 seconds for 336.72 feet; thence deflect to the left on a tangential curve, having a radius of 852.85 feet and a delta angle of 37 degrees 35 minutes 13 seconds for 559.48 feet; thence on an azimuth of 226 degrees 00 minutes 03 seconds for 190.46 feet; thence northwesterly for 351.20 feet on a non-tangential curve, concave to the northeast, having a radius of 253.78 feet, a delta angle of 79 degrees 17 minutes 25 seconds and a chord azimuth of 339 degrees 05 minutes 19 seconds to the northwest boundary of said Plat No. 10-20 and there terminating. Subject to the following restriction: No access shall be permitted to Trunk Highway No 212 from the lands herein conveyed. Abstract Property 358 6 EXHIBIT B 359 1 225440v7 LAND DISTURBANCE AND TREE REMOVAL AUTHORIZATION LAND DISTURBANCE AUTHORIZATION dated ______ _, 20__, issued by the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), to __________________, a Minnesota corporation (the "Developer"). 1.Request for Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for PIONEER RIDGE (referred to in this Contract as the "plat"). The land is situated in the County of Carver, State of Minnesota, on the land legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (“Property”). 2.Conditions of Approval. The plat has received preliminary plat approval and the Public Works Director hereby approves the proposed Land Disturbance and tree removal activity on the Property on condition that the Developer abides by the terms of this agreement as well as furnishes the security required by it subject to the following conditions: A. Land Disturbance activities shall be in compliance with tree removal and erosion control plans identified under Paragraph 3 of this Agreement which shall include the following: mobilization, tree clearing and grubbing, stabilization of exposed soils, perimeter sediment controls around the disturbed areas; and B. If applicable, Developer shall obtain all necessary permits from roadway authorities for mobilization to the Property. 3.Plans. The Property shall be disturbed and tree removals completed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this authorization. Plan A - Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and Schedule dated _______ __, 2025, revised ________ ___, 2025 prepared by __________________. Plan B - Tree Inventory, Removal and Land Disturbance Plan dated _______ __, 2025, revised _______ __, 2025 prepared by ____________________. 360 2 225440v7 4.Time of Performance. The Developer shall complete the tree removal, Land Disturbance and stabilization activities by June 1, 2025. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5.Erosion and Sediment Control. Plan A shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion and sediment control requirements as they deem necessary. All areas disturbed by the Land Disturbance and tree removal operations shall be stabilized forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion and sediment control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City or the MPCA, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to mitigate erosion and control sediment on site. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within thirty (30) days, the City may draw down the letter of credit or cash escrow to pay any costs. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the property is in full compliance with the erosion and sediment control requirements. Street sweeping shall be required as necessary to address any vehicle tracking onto public roads. Stump grubbing and further Land Disturbance operations may not proceed until erosion and sediment control BMPs are in place. City Code chapter 19-145 Erosion And Sediment Control states that an Earthwork Permit is required for land disturbance that is equal to or greater than 5,000 square feet. The developer is required to adhere to City of Chanhassen Erosion and Sediment Control regulations with the tree clearing operations. Inspection records shall be submitted to the City Engineer not less than every two weeks. 6.Clean up. The Developer shall promptly clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 7.Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this authorization, the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash escrow in the total amount of $_______. The security shall be released upon the earlier of: (i) the date the Land Disturbance and tree removal work set forth in the Land Disturbance and tree removal plan is complete and the site is stabilized in conformance with the NPDES General Stormwater Permit (vegetation uniformly established to 70% or better of the intended density) and the approved Plans; or (ii) the plat and accompanying development contract have been recorded and the security provided as required under the development contract has been received by the City which also covers the work contemplated under this Agreement. 361 3 225440v7 8.Responsibility for Costs. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the Land Disturbance and/or erosion and sediment control, including but not limited to legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the permit, the preparation of this permit, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting the Land Disturbance and erosion control. The City will deduct costs incurred by the City from the posted cash escrow outlined in Section 8. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by it and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from permit approval and work done in conjunction with it. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorney's fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this permit, including engineering, site inspections, and attorney's fees by a reduction of the cash escrow. D. In the event that the cash escrow funds are fully diminished, the Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all work and construction. 9.Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than 48 hours in advance. This authorization is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 10.Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Developer agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, and its employees, officials, and agents from and against all claims, actions, damages, losses and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, arising out of Developer’s negligence or its performance or failure to perform its obligations under this Agreement. Developer’s indemnification obligation shall apply to Developer’s general contractor, subcontractor(s), or anyone directly or indirectly employed or hired by Developer, or anyone for whose acts Developer may be liable. Developer agrees this indemnity obligation shall survive the completion or termination of this Agreement. 11.Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement. 362 4 225440v7 12.License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with this Agreement. 13.Acknowledgment. Developer acknowledges that approval of a Land Disturbance and tree removal activities for the Property under the terms of this Agreement does not constitute a guarantee by the City of any future subdivision approvals and that Developer grades the Property at its own risk. 14.Laws. Developer shall comply with all federal, state and local laws in connection with the Land Disturbance and excavation work on the Property and shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits for such work. 15.Termination of Prior Land Disturbance Approvals. This Agreement shall terminate all prior Land Disturbance approvals by the City for the Property. 16.Recording. The Developer agrees that the terms of this Land Disturbance and Tree Removal Development Authorization Agreement shall be a covenant running with the Property. The Developer agrees that the City shall have the right to record a copy of this Agreement with the Carver County Recorder to give notice to future purchasers and owners. 17.Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: ____________________________________., Attn: _____________,_________________________________. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: City of Chanhassen, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317. 363 5 225440v7 CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: _______________________________ Elise Ryan,, Mayor And: ______________________________ Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OFCARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________, 2025, by Elise Ryan and Laurie Hokkanen, respectively the Mayor and City Manager, of the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on its behalf. _________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC 364 6 225440v7 DEVELOPER: _______________________. BY: _________________________________ Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF _________) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of _____________________, 2025, by ___________________________________________ the ____________________________________ of ____________________., a ______________ corporation, on its behalf. _________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL,KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 AMP/smt 365 7 225440v7 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO LAND DISTURBANCE and tree removal AUTHORIZATION Pioneer Ridge LLC, fee owner of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Land Disturbance and Tree RemovalAuthorization, affirms and consents to the provisions thereof and agrees to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by it. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2025. Pioneer Ridge LLC By _________________________ [print name] Its ______________________ [title] STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF __________) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of _____________________, 2025, by _____________________________________________, the ______________________________________________ of Pioneer Ridge LLC, a _________________________________, on behalf of said entity. ________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 651-452-5000 AMP/smt 366 8 225440v7 EXHIBIT A TO LAND DISTURBANCE AUTHORIZATION AGREEMENT Legal Description PID #250270010 That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 27, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, shown as Parcel 60 on Minnesota Department of TransportationRight of Way Plat Numbered 10-20 and Minnesota Department of Transportation right of Way Plat No. 10-43 as the same is on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Carver County, Minnesota; Which lies northwesterly, northerly and northeasterly, of Line 1 described below: Line 1: Commencing at Right of Way Boundary Corner B14 as shown on said Plat No. 10-20; thence southwesterly on an azimuth of 218 degrees 08 minutes 53 seconds along the boundary of said plat for 890.93 feet to Right of Way Boundary Corner B13 and the point of beginning of Line 1 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 210 degrees 36 minutes 52 seconds for 435.09 feet; thence on an azimuth of 202 degrees 57 minutes 17 seconds for 173.07 feet; thence on an azimuth of 267 degrees 24 minutes 40 seconds for 336.72 feet; thence deflect to the left on a tangential curve, having a radius of 852.85 feet and a delta angle of 37 degrees 35 minutes 13 seconds for 559.48 feet; thence on an azimuth of 26 degrees 00 minutes 03 seconds for 190.46 feet; thence northwesterly for 351.20 feet on a non-tangential curve, concave to the northeast, having a radius of 253.78 feet, a delta angle of 79 degrees 17 minutes 25 seconds and a chord azimuth of 339 degrees 05 minutes 19 seconds to the northwest boundary of said Plat No. 10-20 and there terminating. 367 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 18, 2025 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Noyes called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Eric Noyes, Edward Goff, Steve Jobe, Jeremy Rosengren, Perry Schwartz, and Ryan Soller. MEMBERS ABSENT: Katie Trevena. STAFF PRESENT: Rachel Jeske, Planner; Eric Maass, Community Development Director; Mackenze Grunig, Project Engineer; Joe Seidl, Water Resource Engineer. PUBLIC PRESENT: Russell Holmes 1635 Hemlock Way Erin Wong 1674 Hemlock Way Geoff Wong 1674 Hemlock Way Ryan Bauer 1675 Mayapple Pass Lindsey Button 1655 Hemlock Way Glen Shoenberg 1665 Hemlock Way Natania Schoenberg 1665 Hemlcok Way Holly Wilde 1685 Hemlock Way Kristie Habermaier 1664 Hemlock Way Jeff Habermaier 1664 Hemlock Way Jason Besler 1704 Hemlock Way David Grover 2565 Highcrest Court Maureen Homa 1545 Hemlock Way Ted Homa 1545 Hemlock Way Nataraja Nallathamby 1661 Mayapple Pass Christina Graese Brandl Anderson Christopher Contreras Brandl Anderson Nancy Gilmore 1705 Hemlock Way Dan Gilmore 1705 Hemlock Way John Anderson Brandl Anderson Becky Fluegge 1671 Mayapple Pass Holly Hanson 1725 Hemlock Way Kristyn Vickman 1535 Hemlock Way Christopher Juulke 1778 Marigold Court John Santini 1625 Hemlock Way Cathy Santini 1625 Hemlock Way 368 Planning Commission Minutes – February 18, 2025 2 PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Consider an Ordinance Rezoning Property from Right-of-Way to R-8 Mixed Medium Density Residential District and Request for Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Approval for a 60 Unit Townhome Development (Planning Case #2025-01) Eric Maass, Community Development Director, introduced Mackenze Grunig who is the new Project Engineer. Mr. Maass introduced the project with a rendered site plan of the initial proposal, which includes 60 attached townhomes. Mr. Maass said that the city requests applicants to hold neighborhood meetings, which was done with this project. At the meeting, attendees were asked to write down feedback on small pieces of paper. Mr. Maass presented slides to review what residents were hoping to learn about during the neighborhood meeting. After the neighborhood meeting, the residents were able to share what they were still nervous about in regards to the project and what they were happy to learn. Mr. Maass said that the property is currently designed by the city’s comprehensive plan for Medium Density Residential development. He explained that municipalities are required to update their Comprehensive Plan every ten years based on different factors involving growth forecasts provided by the Metropolitan Council. The Comprehensive Plan is reviewed by the Planning Commission, adopted by the City Council, and approved by the Metropolitan Council. The current Comprehensive Plan in effect is the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. He stated that both the 2030 and 2040 Comprehensive Plans gave the site a mixed land use designation of office or residential medium density of four to eight units per acre. Mr. Maass said that the plan did not have a zoning designation, since it was MnDOT right-of-way for transportation projects before MnDOT deemed it as excess and put it up for public auction. Mr. Maass stated they received questions about areas where attached townhomes were backing up to single-family detached homes. Mr. Maass provided examples of similar layouts in Chanhassen, including Mission Homes Townhomes, Powers Place Townhomes, Lake Susan Townhomes, and Prairie Creek Townhomes. Mr. Maass reviewed public feedback about the development, including concerns about the shared boundary with the Pioneer Pass neighborhood to the north. Mr. Maass said that the plans were updated to provide more buffering through the new street becoming a private street which reduced the right of way requirement from 60 feet to 40 feet. He stated that there is now a proposed 80 to 105 feet distance between the detached rear of the single-family homes and the rear of the townhomes. Mr. Maass reviewed the two different product types proposed and said that the applicant needs to provide at least 20 percent of accent material to meet the required threshold outlined in city code. Additionally, Mr. Maass said that there needs to be more variety for architectural differences. He said that if the area is deemed to be critical bat habitat that any tree removal would need to take place prior to April 14, unless the site was reviewed by a qualified inspector and the area not deemed suitable bat habitat. Timelines regarding bat habitat are established by the United States Fish and Wildlife. Mr. Maass showed the original landscaping proposal. He said an additional 84 trees would need to be planted to offset the tree removals. The landscaping plan proposed 217 369 Planning Commission Minutes – February 18, 2025 3 trees. There would need to be plant diversity to meet the city’s plant diversity requirements. Mr. Maass said that this information was added to the plan. Mackenze Grunig, Project Engineer reviewed the proposed street layout, public and private utility plans, as well as proposed location of parking spaces provided in the development. Joe Seidl, Water Resource Engineer, said that the wetland delineation was completed in May 2024. The technical evaluation panel and the City of Chanhassen reviewed and approved the delineation. He stated that two small wetlands were determined to be incidental and created from other roadway projects. Since the wetlands were created incidentally, they can be graded and filled without penalty. Mr. Seidl said that there was one watercourse located in the project. He stated that permitting requirements for the water course required the city, Watershed District, and possibly the Army Corps of Engineers. He reviewed the existing conditions, such as the large hill in the middle of the site. He said that the water runoff on the east side of the site would go down to Bluff Creek, areas to the northwest would drain to the city-owned and maintained wet pond, and drainage to the southwest would drain to the existing drainage ditch system. Mr. Seidl said that there would be more volume created by the storm sewers, which could be mitigated through stormwater best management practices. Mr. Seidl proposed two options for the plan, including a stormwater wet pond reuse system that would capture stormwater and be used to irrigate the site. Mr. Seidl said that the applicant would need to complete additional permitting to ensure they meet regulations. He stated there was a stormwater wet pond located on the northeast of the site to meet water quality and rate control. He said that there would be buffers for the watercourse to meet additional rules and regulations. Mr. Seidl noted that the applicant proposed to outlet the storm sewer down the water course. The water course is highly eroded, so there were concerns that it would be exasperated if it were to take more water. Mr. Seidl said that the city will work with the Watershed and the applicant on the design. He stated an additional concern was at the southwest corner of the site, where there might be a need for some grading or water best management practices to ensure that there will not be excess water. He stated that the stormwater best management practices would be private and need to be maintained by the developer and the Homeowners Association. Mr. Seidl stated that there were standard engineering conditions to implement to address concerns. Mr. Seidl reviewed a concern discussed at the open house about drainage and flooding issues associated with the city-owned wet pond and the adjacent ditch. He reviewed previous aerial photos, which showed water saturation and that there could be potential for subsurface water interactions; the area is encompassed by a drainage and utility easement. The wet pond is on a city-owned outlot and the drainage and utility easement exists in portions of the backyard of the development to the north. He stated that when a development goes through and if there is an area that is known to be wet, the city would include a drainage and utility easement. He commented that a new development could not dump a lot of water there to make the situation worse. Mr. Seidl reviewed hydraulic and hydrological modeling to understand the drainage and reviewed stormwater events. He had a conversation with the developer’s engineer to highlight the concern and mitigate the problem in the final design to make sure the situation would not worsen. Chairman Noyes invited the developer forward to answer questions. 370 Planning Commission Minutes – February 18, 2025 4 John Anderson, Project Manager for Brandl Anderson, stated that Brandl Anderson purchased the site from MnDOT at public auction. He reviewed the original anticipated plan. He commented that they held a public meeting a few weeks ago and afterward adjusted the plan set to address neighborhood concerns. The adjustments included moving from a public street layout to a private street layout to push the units adjacent to the neighborhood further south for a larger setback and to plant trees for a buffer along the property line. He stated that the water would not touch neighbors’ property, but instead go into the swale which would drain the water west to the pond. He said that they would increase the pond size, which would increase the overall level and help things from a drainage standpoint. Their engineers were trying to figure out how to best address stormwater issues at the watercourse. The existing drainage channel might need upgrades, which would be addressed in the final plan. He stated that the site meets all the required zoning requirements. He commented that the existing power line on the site would be relocated to the very south property line. He said that they received comments from the watershed district. He commented that they wanted to start work on grading, streets, and utilities in the spring, and start house construction in the late summer. Commissioner Schwartz asked about the Homeowners Association’s responsibilities of maintaining the stormwater ponds. Mr. Anderson said that there was a maintenance agreement that would require the Homeowners Association to maintain the pond. He said this typically includes requirements that the ponding does not fill up with sediment and that appropriate vegetation is planted. The Homeowners Association would also be responsible for maintaining the private streets. Commissioner Schwartz asked about marketing terms they planned to use to describe the wetland and the pond. Mr. Anderson answered that the two wetlands on site will not exist when the project is complete since they were deemed incidental. He said that they would describe the stormwater pond as a best management practice. Chairman Noyes asked for a description of the swale. He asked if it presented an elevation change and if it provided an optical or physical buffering between the development to the north and the proposed development. Mr. Anderson answered that the swale would be grass or sodded and could be mowed. He said the elevation change would be less than two feet from the normal landscape to the swale. He stated it would not create a buffer and it would be approximately twenty feet from the property line. He said that the trees would be the buffer. Commissioner Jobe questioned the design and if they accounted for a 50-year flood or 100-year flood with water run-offs. Mr. Anderson said that he did not know the answer and asked Mr. Seidl. Mr. Seidl answered that the standard regulations when designing stormwater best management practice would be two-year, ten-year, and 100-year storm events. He said that there were accepted models that differed based on your location and how much water they conveyed. He provided an example of a 100-year event in Chanhassen, which would be 7.5 inches of stormwater in 24 hours, and how the stormwater runs over that period. He explained that the calculations are standard wastewater engineering and they utilize data from Atlas 14. He said 371 Planning Commission Minutes – February 18, 2025 5 that the stormwater system would be designed for a 10-year event and best management practices would be designed for a 100-year event. Chairman Noyes stated that he reviewed 517 pages regarding the proposal. He said there was a huge concern about traffic. He requested information about the findings of the traffic study and how it might mitigate resident concerns. Mr. Anderson answered that the study found that Bluff Creek Drive and Pioneer Trail can handle the additional traffic loads. He stated that a comment was that the southwest corner of the site has a hillside, so they would need to regrade this so people can see traffic coming down the hill. Mr. Grunig clarified that the access proposed onto Pioneer Trail would be a right-in and right-out access only which would reduce the conflicts of the possible traffic issues. He said there was adequate capacity on Pioneer Trail and Bluff Creek Boulevard to support the homes. Commissioner Schwartz asked if the additional traffic generated by the 60 homes had been looked into with regard to adding to the existing traffic from the neighborhood to the north. Mr. Grunig answered that Bluff Creek Boulevard was designed to support the growth of additional developments. Commissioner Schwartz asked if there was a way to objectively identify the discrepancy between what he said and the comments from the neighbors about the safety issues with additional traffic regarding the development. Mr. Grunig answered that he would have to discuss the information with the Engineering Department to understand the best response. Mr. Maass said that Bluff Creek Boulevard and Pioneer Trail were collector streets. He said that collector streets are designed to absorb traffic flows from neighborhoods as cities utilize the land use plan. He said that as they anticipated growth, roads needed to be built to support the growth. He said that Bluff Creek Boulevard was built to accommodate the anticipated traffic generated as land was developed in accordance with the city’s Comprehensive Plan land use designations. Commissioner Schwartz said that the neighbors to the north said that there are current safety issues regarding traffic in the neighborhood and that this development would add additional safety issues. Although Bluff Creek Boulevard is a collector road, the residents believe there are current traffic safety issues before the added development. The development could increase the issues. He asked how to resolve the discrepancies between the complaints and the information provided. Mr. Maass responded that the applicant would need to address the grading of the hill to help with the visibility to help with safety. He stated that the perception of a safety concern is not the same as a traffic study which uses accepted engineering standards to identify safety issues that require mitigation. Commissioner Soller asked if there were any changes to prevent left turns out of the neighborhood onto Pioneer Trail. Mr. Anderson answered that there was a median in the center of Pioneer Trail to help with this concern. 372 Planning Commission Minutes – February 18, 2025 6 Commissioner Soller asked if it was a single-stop sign for exiting traffic but remained a through- road for north and south traffic on Bluff Creek Boulevard. Mr. Anderson confirmed this information. Mr. Anderson noted that there was a private overhead streetlight proposed at that intersection for nighttime driving and lighting purposes. Chairman Noyes asked if the wet pond expansion would be a city pond. Mr. Seidl answered that this decision was not sorted out. He explained that when you mix public and private stormwater it becomes public. The pond expansion would benefit residents. Commissioner Rosengren asked if there was a necessity for a fence or a barrier for road noise on the east side of the development since it appeared to be close to 212. Mr. Maass said that they sent the plans for MnDOT for review, but a barrier was unnecessary. Commissioner Rosengren asked if there would be new trees planted on the east side that might help with the noise. Mr. Maass confirmed this information. Commissioner Schwartz asked how the city would implement their maintenance easement if the plans were private. Mr. Seidl answered that if the ponds were private, the city would not have an easement over them. He said that they would have a stormwater operations agreement that gave similar rights as an easement to inspect best management practices, but the city would not need to have an easement over it. Mr. Seidl said the city found that maintaining easements over a stormwater infrastructure made it complicated to figure out how they would be maintained. There is a standard template agreement that explains how the best management practices would be maintained. He stated that he spent a lot of time reviewing and making comments because he wanted to make sure that a future person in the water resources engineer role would understand what the city owns and maintains and what the private owner owns and maintains. Commissioner Schwartz asked if they anticipated a check and balance or an oversight on the maintenance of these ponds. Mr. Seidl answered that there were requirements with the permitting from the MPCA. The permitting process requires a program that checks in on private best management practices. He stated that the city is working on collecting data and building out a database. He commented that the general idea is in the future, the city would be auditing and doing inspections. He said that the inspection form that is standard with the agreement requires that the private owner completes an inspection every year and submits it to the city. Mr. Seidl said that he would link these inspections to the database and it would be clear what properties were not completing the inspections and the city would follow up. Commissioner Schwartz asked if there would be penalties. Mr. Seidl confirmed this information. Commissioner Schwartz provided an example of how his Homeowners Association has had many boards come and go, so the current board has no idea about their responsibilities for the maintenance of the stormwater pond. He stated that the developer sold homes with a water feature rather than a stormwater maintenance pond, and sold the houses for $10,000 more. He 373 Planning Commission Minutes – February 18, 2025 7 said that residents feel confused and angry when muck appears on the stormwater ponds every year. Mr. Seidl said he would be happy to discuss this situation with him and answer questions about the maintenance of the stormwater feature in his development. Commissioner Schwartz thanked Mr. Seidl for the offer. Commissioner Goff said that the street moved from a public street to a private street, so there would be responsibilities for snow removal. He asked if any other services were impacted, such as fire. Mr. Maass said that since the width of the street was reduced, there would be no street parking to ensure that there would be access for emergency service vehicles in the event of an emergency. He explained that the north corner and the eastern corner have turnarounds that the fire department reviewed. He stated that there is a twenty-foot front yard setback in the driveways to allow for parking. Commissioner Jobe asked how much public parking was available per unit. Mr. Maass answered that the city requires one guest parking stall for every four units. He stated that since there were 60 units, the City Code would require 15 parking stalls. Chairman Noyes asked if there was a plan to revisit the visitor parking stalls since it was centralized. Mr. Maass answered that the city recommended that the applicant move some of the parking to the corner so it would be more accessible to other units. Commissioner Soller clarified the zoning changes. He said that the Comprehensive Plan had guided the future of this lot for many years. He said that the Comprehensive Plan sets things in motion, but there might be flexibility in terms of what it allows. He stated that R8 was one permissible re-zoning outcome, but asked if other potential zoning outcomes were allowed within the available zones. Mr. Maass answered that the Comprehensive Plan establishes a range that densities had to fall within. He explained that the Residential Medium Zoning District requires between four and eight units an acre. He said the Comprehensive Plan identifies four zoning districts – RLM, R8, PUDR within the Residential Medium Zoning District. He said that the R8 was one of the zoning districts allowed. Commissioner Soller asked if the city was led by the interests of the land developer if it fell within the Comprehensive Plan requirements. He wanted to understand the confines of the Comprehensive Plan and submitted proposals. Mr. Maass answered that the Comprehensive Plan shows the zoning district options. Once the zoning district is selected based on which zoning districts are eligible, there are minimum standards that need to be met with the zoning district. Chairman Noyes asked if the bike path and sidewalks were being maintained in the plan. Mr. Maass answered that they were in the city’s right-of-way and being maintained. Commissioner Soller asked if the green area was zoned A2. Mr. Maass answered that the land was owned by the city and was a part of the Bluff Creek Overlay District. He stated it had an A2 zoning designation. 374 Planning Commission Minutes – February 18, 2025 8 Commissioner Soller asked if the other gray areas to the east were part of the MnDOT right-of- way. Mr. Maass confirmed that information. Commissioner Schwartz asked if the other parcels owned by MnDOT in the immediate vicinity could be sold. Mr. Maass said it was his understanding that those parcels were not intended to be sold. The other areas were not seen as developable with the interchanges and heavily wooded areas. Commissioner Soller said he wanted to understand the structure and the process behind the decision. He asked whether there were additional options or if it was a well-designed plan. Mr. Maass said that the project as proposed did not request variances, and it meets the land use parameters and zoning standards. He stated that the city staff prepared findings of fact related to the subdivision and site plan for approval. If the Planning Commission or City Council finds that there is a finding of fact that is inaccurate, they could provide concern. He commented that city staff work hard to ensure accurate findings of fact. Chairman Noyes indicated that there were sixteen letters from the public. Some of the letters were submitted before the changes to the site plan. He reviewed the themes of the letters, including tree removal, parking and traffic, potential declining traffic values, erosion, flooding, lack of a buffer, and removal of green space. He stated there would be a five-minute limit per person. He requested that they state their name and address and speak clearly in the microphone. He requested if the agreement is the same as one previously mentioned, to state the similarity rather than giving detailed information. He said if the information was new, it could be shared. Chairman Noyes opened the public hearing. Geoff Wong, 1674 Hemlock Way, voiced appreciation to the Mayor for answering questions to understand the on-site concerns. He said he understood that growth was needed, but was concerned with how it was being done. He discussed the erosion concerns and echoed agreement on the comments from the commissioner. He said that there were a lot of kids in the neighborhood, so he had safety concerns. He stated that there was a huge park to the west of the neighborhood that was utilized by the kids for recreational needs, so the collector road is frequently occupied and crossed. He stated that the traffic was a concern since Avienda was brought to light. He commented that there were concerns about emergency services being able to access the road. He asked if taxpayer money is used to improve the current infrastructure to support this type of neighborhood. He said that the infrastructure or the strain on the city would be impacted, especially if additional neighborhoods like this come up. He suggested a Comprehensive Risk Assessment Plan for the commissioners to understand the uncertainty about who was responsible for different aspects of the drainage. He said a mitigation plan should be fully understood before the site plan was approved. He asked how the 2040 Comprehensive Plan aligned with the city. He commented that Chanhassen was voted as one of the most desirable cities to live in and there was a reason for that, so it would be important to consider what was best for the neighborhood. 375 Planning Commission Minutes – February 18, 2025 9 Erin Wong, 1674 Hemlock Way, voiced appreciation for the changes to the setback in some areas by Brandl Anderson. She said she did not see changes to the setback on the east side, so some homes are still pretty tight along the property. She proposed a solution to consider single- family homes against the existing single-family homes and then keeping the rest of the property of townhomes. She said that the road would be the buffer and it would be similar to the current neighborhood. She suggested they could also consider duplexes. She said these options would help keep greenspace and the feel of the neighborhood and mitigate the issues of reduced property values. She said that two neighbors moved and had to accept offers of $20,000 to $30,000 less than if the townhomes were not going to be placed in the backyard. She reiterated the traffic concerns by adding 60 townhomes and potentially 120 more cars. She often sees near- misses and has to wait often to cross the street when she is walking her dog. She commented that the trees would take twenty to thirty years for the trees to grow to provide a buffer to the townhomes. Lindsey Button, 1655 Hemlock Way, said that her property line sits approximately 20 feet from the back patio of the 290-foot proposed two-story multi-family housing structure. She commented that the structure was very different from the existing single-family homes. She said it was different to share backyard space with one family than with six families. She thanked Brandl Anderson for listening to their concerns and putting evergreens to create a buffer. She said that there was limited space and the townhouse residents could likely reach out from their patio and touch the evergreens. She commented that trees were too close and did not align with the Comprehensive Plan, which required transitions between different land uses. She said when these natural features were absent, the land use plan allowed for buffer yards with increased setbacks with landscaping and berms to improve the separation of incompatible uses. She said that there should be an orderly setback that makes sense and provided an example of the Lake Susan Development that provided 100 feet of separation between the low-density houses and medium-density houses. She asked for the same consideration when considering the development of their property. She reiterated the concerns of Erin Wong with the traffic. She commented that the road was icy and snowy in the winter and coming down the hill was dangerous, so it was a huge risk for young drivers. She said there was poor visibility on Hemlock Drive which provided additional risks for drivers. She voiced concerns about the influx of traffic with Avienda. She appreciated the discussion of the medium-density designation for the land and reviewed what the Comprehensive Plan stated. She said it would make more sense to be R4 rather than R8 when backing up to single-family homes. She commented that the land was 11.75 acres and 2.5 acres would be road and infrastructure and 2.5 acres would not be developed. She said there would be 10 dwellings per acre which far exceeded the amount allowed by R8 development. She requested to reconsider if it made sense to put 10 houses on one acre behind low-density homes. She requested that the land be redesignated to R4 to provide continuity with the other neighborhoods, provide a sense of order, and decrease traffic concerns to keep kids safe. Kristie Habermaier, 1664 Hemlock Way, stated that she was the original owner of her house and moved in in 2011. She said that she understood the need for growth in the community, but did not believe the current Pioneer Ridge proposal did not match the best interests of the neighborhood or the city. She voiced agreement with the previously stated safety concerns. She discussed the entrance added to Bluff Creek Drive. She said the hill prevented visibility, but the 376 Planning Commission Minutes – February 18, 2025 10 trees also did. She commented that there was ice which provided concerns. She stated she was worried about the intersection with the newly licensed drivers and newly permitted drivers in the driveway. She commented that her daughter has an easier time pulling out of the driveway at nighttime since you can see headlights. She thought that the traffic would get worse, especially with the completion of Avienda. She said her house shares a backyard with Becky’s house on Mayapple. She appreciated that they measured her strip of Hemlock and Mayapple, but those were single-family house homes backing up to each other, not townhouses. She commented that the City of Chanhassen was voted as one of the best places to raise a family. She explained that her neighborhood acted as her village as she helped raise a family and was a tight-knit group. She commented that a few neighbors moved because of the development and other families were planning to do the same if the current proposal went through. She voiced devastation about the idea of the neighborhood being ripped apart. She said that a developer told her at a meeting that it could be worse and the townhouses could be three stories, but that did not make her feel better. She voiced appreciation that they listened to concerns and made some changes but expressed the need to consider other options such as what Lindsey Button mentioned. She asked that they reconsider the street that enters and exits on Bluff Creek Drive. She encouraged the Planning Commission to consider their own houses and neighborhoods and if this would be something that they would want. Tedd Homa, 1545 Hemlock Way, commented that his house did not back up to the proposed development. He shared the same concerns already mentioned by other neighbors. He also expressed concerns about safety westbound on Pioneer Trail, which was 50 miles per hour over the overpass. He said that the roads were not in good shape, and you could not be in the right- hand lane without sliding. He worried about increased accidents on Pioneer Trail which would be terrifying for new neighbors. He commented that he would be blocked from turning left on Hemlock Way. He said it would be necessary to consider the proposed traffic from the south to go to the industrial areas, especially the Avienda Group. Cathy Santini, 1625 Hemlock Way, said that she had three traffic questions and issues directed to the city. She asked as you are heading northbound on Bluff Creek Drive, if there would be a right-hand turn lane. She also asked if there would be a left-hand turn lane for southbound traffic. She thought a turn lane would be helpful for the traffic coming through the neighborhood. She discussed the iciness when coming south on Bluff Creek Drive and asked for the city to keep an eye on the intersection to see if it needed to be regraded. There has been a lot of snow and ice that gathered there in the past. She stated there were lights in four directions as you were headed eastbound on Pioneer Trail at the intersection. But if you were headed eastbound, you only get a yellow flashing arrow for turning and there is no green arrow. She suggested a green arrow to have the right-of-way would be helpful. Russell Holmes, 1635 Hemlock Way, commented that his property was in front of the water course. He agreed with the concerns discussed by his neighbors. He agreed with Cathy’s comments about adding turning lanes for traffic. He said that Bluff Creek has unregulated crosswalks and traffic circles, so increased traffic flow puts additional risks. He said Pioneer Trail had traffic lights, but Bluff Creek did not even though they were classified in similar ways. He thanked the Planning Commission for looking at the plan and their concerns regarding traffic and drainage. He stated he heard a lot about water drainage to the west. He said the watercourse 377 Planning Commission Minutes – February 18, 2025 11 was horrendous with the erosion and the debris. He voiced concerns about relying on it as a major point of drainage but figuring out the details after the plan was approved. He asked who would maintain the watercourse long term and the agreements with the city to ensure it remains an open drainage site. He appreciates that the developer listened to concerns and added trees as a buffer, but the trees would be small for many years. Mr. Holmes suggested that the northern perimeter should also have trees so that those on the edge of the property would receive the benefit of privacy from the development. He said that the two outlots to the property should become a part of city land to ensure that they remain green space in the future. Glen Shoenberg, 1665 Hemlock Way, said that Chanhassen has had a lot of well-planned growth, but he did not think that this project was well-planned. He commented that the road came out on a hill, which made it difficult to make a left turn onto the development from the north if there was ice on the road. He said that there was a crosswalk further north up the hill to the park, but not everyone utilizes the crosswalk and choose to cross at Hemlock Way. He commented that kids do not understand the risks of crossing the road. He stated that there were sixteen guest parking spaces and no street parking, which was not enough. There was no street parking on Bluff Creek Drive or Pioneer Trail, so he voiced concerns about parking on Hemlock Way and people crossing through his backyard. He voiced concerns about safety such as trespassing. He said that people choose Chanhassen for the thoughtfulness of neighborhood design and green spaces. There was a lack of green, open space in this design. He commented that Chanhassen needed to maintain green space and environmental health and that the proposed development introduces a metropolitan atmosphere. He stated that other townhomes in Chanhassen have increased buffer spaces. He said that the 2040 Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan supports low-density residential development in appropriate areas of the community in such areas that maintain the aesthetic of single-family homes and to create new neighborhoods with similar quality. He said that the plan also requires increased buffer areas for neighborhoods of different densities. He commented that the city needed to ensure the landowner abides by these requirements and urged alternate solutions for the development of the land. He believes that the property met the zoning requirements but not the land-use goals in the Comprehensive Plan. Nancy Gilmore, 1705 Hemlock Way, said that her house backs up to the development. She agreed with the statements from her neighbors. She said today as she pulled onto Bluff Creek, she almost got into a car accident. She stated that the through traffic from Pioneer Trail to Avienda was ridiculous. She said it was difficult to cross the road to the park. She stated that the buffer of small trees would not make a difference. She said that they need to consider respect for the residents who have lived there for years. Christopher Juulke, 1778 Marigold Court, agreed with the statements shared tonight by other residents. He reiterated the safety concern and said that there were no places where the cars stop between the stoplight and the roundabout further down, so cars increase their speed while driving. He asked for additional ideas to slow the traffic and provide safe-crossing for children. Jason Besler, 1704 Hemlock Way, said the development did not directly impact his property. He stated that there were a lot of unanswered questions, so he encouraged the Planning Commission to call a time-out and hold additional discussions. 378 Planning Commission Minutes – February 18, 2025 12 Glen Shoenberg, 1665 Hemlock Way, spoke again. He said that the traffic proposal said that the grading won’t meet the recommended sight lines for the proposal. Chairman Noyes closed the public hearing. Chairman Noyes said that there were a lot of comments about the traffic study and residents provided valid comments. He recognized that both of the roads were collector roads and he asked what options there were on the roads as it related to safety, such as turn lanes or roundabouts. Mr. Grunig answered that turn lanes were not a part of the project right now, and it was not recommended based on the traffic study. Chairman Noyes asked how to separate the facts from fiction as it relates to traffic and whether there were actions that the city could take to improve the situation. He asked how they were evaluated and implemented. Mr. Grunig said he would love to hear about the safety concerns specifically from residents as he is the chair of the Traffic Safety Committee and can request more enforcement. He stated that Bluff Creek Boulevard was a collector road and is designed to receive a lot of traffic. He commented that there were different ways that the city could decrease speed or improve pedestrian safety. Chairman Noyes said it would be important to review the options based on concerns. Commissioner Schwartz commented on the high usage rates of the adjacent Pioneer Pass Park and said it was an everyday issue to have difficulties crossing the street to get to the park. He asked how someone doing a traffic study could not see these issues, unless they were not accurate. Mr. Maass answered that the traffic study did not make the lived experiences untrue, but the traffic study is a science-based engineering approach to analyze the roadway capacity and design solutions. He commented that proper grading can solve the sight distance issue. The analysis did not require turn lanes, but the neighbors expressed concerns about traffic issues on Bluff Creek Boulevard. He said that these traffic issues could be brought to the city’s Traffic Safety Committee for review. He said there were additional pedestrian safety issues that could be improved by the city that the city could improve when necessary. These improvements are not connected to the development or within the boundaries of the proposed plat. Commissioner Schwartz reiterated if residents follow up with Mr. Grunig, they can be sure that there concerns about traffic on Bluff Creek Boulevard are heard. Mr. Maass answered that he took extensive notes and would take the information to the Traffic Safety Committee to discuss additional improvements. Chairman Noyes asked if potential pedestrian improvements within the road would be a parallel or a serial process to the review of this project. He asked if they could put a hold on the project until the road improvements were made. Mr. Maass answered that the two projects would be separate and were not applicable to the rezoning or the site plan. Commissioner Jobe said if the setback was set, but people were asking to reduce the size of the housing unit or the angle, the Planning Commission could only put it as a request. Mr. Maass answered that they could make it a request but not a requirement. 379 Planning Commission Minutes – February 18, 2025 13 Commissioner Schwartz clarified that changing the configuration of the development, such as switching to single-family houses, would be outside of the Planning Commission’s role. Mr. Maass confirmed this information unless there were amendments to the Comprehensive Plan or a request by the property owner for a switch in which of the eligible zoning districts was being pursued. Chairman Noyes asked if they were providing feedback about zoning. Mr. Maass said they were providing recommendations on the rezoning, preliminary plat, and site plan. Commissioner Schwartz clarified that the plan meets the criteria, so the discretion to approve or not approve is based on whether it meets the criteria. He commented that since it meets the criteria, they have no choice but to confirm. Mr. Maass confirmed this information. Commissioner Soller asked about the exit onto Bluff Creek Drive and if it was required based on the flow of traffic and how people should enter and exit the new neighborhood, or if it was based on how the developers wanted to plan the neighborhood to meet market demand. He asked if there was an alternative to consider no exit onto Bluff Creek Drive since there were concerns about traffic on Bluff Creek Drive. Mr. Maass answered that access to Bluff Creek and Pioneer Trail was a recommendation of city staff. There was a limitation for cul-de-sacs of 750 feet for purposed of public safety. Anything in excess of 750 feet would require a variance and it was unclear if city staff would support such a request. Commissioner Soller clarified that the exits and entrances were for public safety. Mr. Maass answered that the recommendations for exits and entrances were a right-in and right-out on Pioneer Trail and access to Bluff Creek Boulevard. Commissioner Jobe asked if there was a 100-year flood and if areas were public, the city would service it, but if it was private, the Homeowner’s Association would be responsible. He asked about the triangle point and whether it could be made into public land for a playground or a nature preserve. Mr. Maass responded that the city would own a portion of the land for preservation excluding the pond and the best management practice area. Mr. Seidl voiced appreciation for the stance expressed for the plans to be fully figured out with no questions. He said the stormwater design was complicated and there were a lot of moving parts. He looks through developments through a specific lens to determine whether the plans are far along enough so that he can address reasonable concerns. He said during a preliminary plat review; he is conditioning things that need to be done before a final plat review. The designation of the water feature depends on the final design and if it would be considered private or public. He would not let things move forward from a stormwater perspective unless there were engineering solutions for any possible issues. Commissioner Schwartz asked if a Homeowners Association would be required to maintain a vegetative buffer around the ponds. Mr. Seidl answered that the City Code did not require a buffer around stormwater management features. He said that the wet ponds would not require a 380 Planning Commission Minutes – February 18, 2025 14 native buffer, but there were rules and regulations on watercourses that the applicant would need to sort through. Commissioner Soller said that an unanswered question was about the language brought up when planning developments in the Comprehensive Plan, especially with the transition from one zone to another zone. He said that the plan felt slightly in contradiction to the language of the Comprehensive Plan about transitions from one zone to the next. Mr. Maass said that the Pioneer Pass neighborhood was zoned residential low-medium or RLM. He stated that the Comprehensive Plan looked to segmentally organize land use and that medium density residential adjacent to low density residential is an appropriate land use adjacency. He said that an example of an incompatible adjacent land use designation would be heavy industrial. He said that the modified proposal was aligned with the distances of the homes in the area, but recognized the differences between spacing with townhomes and single-family homes. He commented that the buffering area was appropriate and based on city code. Commissioner Jobe asked about privacy and separation. Mr. Maass answered that both evergreen and decisions trees were proposed for buffering and would be six-foot at installation and should grow one to two feet per year. He commented a six-foot tree was less susceptible to various issues when transplanted than larger trees. Commissioner Rosengren said he reviewed the Carver County Community Development Agency’s Housing Marke Study which was recently reviewed by the City Council. He said that the report stated that Chanhassen has a nine-month supply of land to build new houses. He said that the median cost to build a new house in Chanhassen was $800,000 and that 90 percent of the people who work in Chanhassen do not live in Chanhassen. He asked where houses would fit in Chanhassen to meet Carver County expectations. He stated that the concerns were valid and needed to be heard by the city staff, but they would need to consider how to provide different types of housing options for individuals who will move to Chanhassen in the future. He stated it was less of a concern about the zoning and whether it fit into the Comprehensive Plan, but there was a need to adapt and grow as a community while also properly addressing resident concerns. Commissioner Soller stated he questioned whether the City Code made appropriate requirements and whether the design was considered when two different zones were next to each other. He asked if the City Code considered transitions between different districts. Mr. Maass answered that the city had buffer yard requirements and design guidelines for multi-family housing. Commissioner Soller asked if the buffers and setbacks required in an R8 do not change based on the zone it is next to. Mr. Maass indicated that city code outlines the buffering requirements based on adjacent land use. Commissioner Soller said maybe the idea was unheard of in City Planning. Mr. Maass said that the downtown zoning district required a high-density residential adjacent to detached single- family homes, the rear yard setback must match the setback for single-family homes even though it is zoned for downtown designation. He explained that the downtown designation and detached single-family designation were opposite ends of the zoning ordinance in terms of density. He stated that the city could add one between R8 and RLM, but it is not in the City Code today so it 381 Planning Commission Minutes – February 18, 2025 15 could not consider that as a variable applicable to the project. He stated that R8 and RLM zoning districts were similar to each other, so it might not be appropriate to mandate the same rear yard setback. He stated that they were not far off from meeting the comparison. Commissioner Schwartz said that Chanhassen has developed the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance appropriately which could be built on in the future. Chairman Noyes said he was not sold on the traffic study. He had trust in the city and that they would investigate issues and consider resolutions. He understood that people had concerns about erosion. He said that he was confident between Mr. Seidl’s team, the developer, and the DNR, the concerns with erosion and water would be addressed. He stated that the builder proposed an adequate buffer. He said that the buffer was not the issue, but that residents did not want townhomes in the area. He stated that the decrease of property values was not because they were townhomes, but because of the loss of green space in the backyard. He commented that the green space would go away no matter how the land was developed. He said that there needed to be further discussions about traffic and it would need to be a parallel process. They would not stop the project because of the traffic. He wanted the City Council to know that there were concerns with the set-up of the roads and there were some solutions that could mitigate the traffic and safety concerns expressed. He said that collector roads were designed to have a lot of traffic on them, but high-volume streets could still be made safer and fit the needs of residents. Commissioner Schwartz asked if the property values go down because the green space was being developed and if the property value differences would be offset since the townhomes would be fairly expensive. Chairman Noyes answered that he was not sure, but it was a good question. Commissioner Soller said that the City Council would need to review the concerns since they have a wider purview. He encouraged them not to stigmatize individuals moving into the townhomes. People tend to treat the neighborhood as their own and treat it respectfully. Chairman Noyes commented that the residents in the townhomes would have common goals of safety for their families. Commissioner Schwartz asked if they wanted the City Council to see their concerns and if they should change the motion or provide comments. Mr. Maass responded that he took copious notes from the meeting tonight and there would be no need to amend the motion. He said that the comments from the public meeting and the meeting minutes would be provided to the City Council. The concerns had been noted and would be addressed at the City Council. Chairman Noyes said the Planning Commission’s job is to make sure the proposals met the land use and zoning designations. The Planning Commission was a recommending body based on those factors. He wanted residents to understand that the commission could not vote no to a project just because of other merits. Commissioner Jobe moved, Commissioner Schwartz seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the requested rezoning of the property to R-8 Mixed Medium Density Residential District and recommending 382 Planning Commission Minutes – February 18, 2025 16 preliminary plat and site plan approval for a 60-unit townhome development subject to the conditions included in the staff report dated February 12, 2025. The motion carried with a vote of 5 to 1 (Noyes voted Nay) GENERAL BUSINESS: APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED JANUARY 21, 2025 Commissioner Goff moved, Commissioner Jobe seconded to approve the Chanhassen Planning Commission summary minutes dated January 21, 2025, as presented. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS: None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS: Eric Maass, Community Development Director, updated the Commissioners, noting the City Council interviewed architecture firms for the Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center and would make the decision tomorrow. They would then notify the selected firm to move forward. Chairman Noyes asked if anything changed on Avienda. Mr. Maass responded that they were identifying the acreage that the city would buy and platting it out to leave useable outlots on either side for a future hotel. He said he had no other pending applications within Avienda to share at that time. Commissioner Schwartz asked when demolition of the hotel downtown would commence. Mr. Maass answered that the site owners received approval from the Watershed District with conditions. They are working on those conditions for final approval from the Watershed District until they move forward. There were a few things that needed to be done before taking down the building, but the building would be demolished into itself and then debris cleared. He stated that the cinema demolition would take a month and then they would move forward to the hotel. Commissioner Jobe asked if there are any changes planned for the transit facility. Mr. Maass said he was not aware of any changes to the transit facility. Commissioner Soller asked if there was a specific date for the removal of the cinema so residents could pay final respects. Mr. Maass answered they made the public aware of the project via communication channels several times, but they do not have a specific date, but it is likely soon. Commissioner Schwartz suggested sharing the demolition date with the local media and the museum to capture the last hurrah of the mural and structures. Mr. Maass responded that the Historical Society already removed items from the hotel and High Timber Lounge. 383 Planning Commission Minutes – February 18, 2025 17 Commissioner Schwartz suggested that the Paisley Park museum could do photography for historical purposes of the mural. Chairman Noyes asked if there were any agenda items for the next meeting on March 4. Mr. Maass responded that the Comprehensive Plan allows for density bonuses for the development of affordable housing. The attorney said that there needs to be specific parameters in the code for this to be utilized. The City Council would discuss this in their work session and then the Planning Commission would review the rough draft and provide feedback. Commissioner Soller asked about the current state of the cannabis ordinance. Mr. Maass said that it was on the City Council agenda for Monday evening on February 24. The City Council was discussing buffering of cannabis, alcohol, and tobacco sales from residential treatment facilities and schools. The City Attorney recommended having a baseline ordinance in place. Commissioner Schwartz asked about the Civic Campus construction. Mr. Maass responded that city staff were on the second floor of the new building for a tour, and it was moving along well. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION: None. OPEN DISCUSSION: None. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Schwartz moved, Commissioner Soller seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Submitted by Eric Maass Community Development Director 384 From: Laurie Ambrose Sent: Monday, January 27, 2025 9:11 PM To: McDonald, Jerry <jmcdonald@chanhassenmn.gov>; Schubert, Haley <hschubert@chanhassenmn.gov>; von Oven, Mark <mvonoven@chanhassenmn.gov>; Kimber, Josh <jkimber@chanhassenmn.gov> Cc: Maass, Eric <emaass@chanhassenmn.gov>; Ryan, Elise <eryan@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Concerns about Pioneer Ridge Development Dear Jerry, Haley, Mark, and Josh, I hope this letter flnds you well. I am writing to express my concerns about the proposed construction of Pioneer Ridge in Chanhassen. While I appreciate the city’s dedication to providing diverse housing options, I believe that this development confiicts with Chanhassen’s vision and poses signiflcant challenges to the community, environment, and overall character of the area. The City of Chanhassen’s Comprehensive Plan sets a clear vision for maintaining low- density residential developments in appropriate areas. It emphasizes preserving the aesthetic of existing single-family homes and creating new neighborhoods of similar character and quality. Squeezing these townhouses in right next to existing single family housing neighborhood would contradict this vision and introducing medium-density housing that is incompatible with the surrounding area disrupts the community’s established identity. As I understand it, the city also highlights the importance of creating transition zones between land uses, “using natural features or buffer zones with increased setbacks, landscaping, and berming.” No such transition is planned for this project, further highlighting its inconsistency with the city’s stated goals. I can’t imagine the view the people who back up to this area would have and the detriment it would bring to the value of the homes in the Pioneer Pass neighborhood. It is hard to understand why the city would approve a re-zoning request that would immediately decrease the value and enjoyment of the homes of several Chanhassen residents who have been homeowners in the community for over a decade. One of the most troubling aspects of the proposed development is its environmental impact. The site in question currently serves as a sanctuary for wildlife, including deer, pheasants, foxes, turkeys, and coyotes. This area is a vital corridor for wildlife, with animals frequently seen crossing the land in the mornings and evenings. Destroying this habitat would not only displace these species but also erode the natural beauty that Chanhassen 385 has committed to preserving. The Comprehensive Plan explicitly states that housing developments should respect the natural environment and strive to preserve wooded areas, existing vegetation, and wildlife habitats. Proceeding with this project would directly violate those principles. Especially when you take into consideration that Avienda and the newly approved community center have/will displace wildlife from a large space on the immediate other side of this area. Traffic concerns also cannot be overlooked. New developments should avoid funneling high traffic volumes through residential neighborhoods. The addition of an R-8 medium- density development alongside Avienda and a new community center will undoubtedly increase traffic through the existing neighborhood and next to Pioneer Pass Park, posing safety risks to the many children who enjoy this area. As a resident of Pioneer Pass, it is already mind-blowing to see how hard it is to safely cross the road from the park to Mayapple Pass as drivers consistently pay no attention to pedestrians and drive well above the speed limit. I know we both have goals to maintain the community’s character and preserve its natural assets. Allowing this project to proceed would set a troubling precedent that undermines the very principles guiding Chanhassen’s growth and development. In light of these concerns, I urge you to reconsider approving this development or the re- zoning of this land. It is essential to prioritize projects that align with the city’s long-term vision and respect the environment, wildlife, and character of existing neighborhoods. I trust that the City of Chanhassen will honor the commitments outlined in its Comprehensive Plan and seek alternative locations or solutions that better serve the community as a whole. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I appreciate all you do as a representative of the members of our community! Sincerely, Laurie Ambrose - 1515 Hemlock Way, Chanhassen Laurie Ambrose 386 From: Nathan Button < Sent: Friday, January 24, 2025 4:19 PM To: Maass, Eric <emaass@chanhassenmn.gov>; Ryan, Elise <eryan@chanhassenmn.gov>; von Oven, Mark <mvonoven@chanhassenmn.gov>; Kimber, Josh <jkimber@chanhassenmn.gov>; McDonald, Jerry <jmcdonald@chanhassenmn.gov>; Schubert, Haley <hschubert@chanhassenmn.gov>; lisa@lisaforcarvercounty.com <lisa@lisaforcarvercounty.com> Subject: Pioneer Pass Chanhassen City Council – I live in Pioneer Pass neighborhood near the proposed new development, and would like to express my deep concerns about this project as it’s currently laid out. Currently, the back of our house overlooks a beautiful, wooded area, which would be eliminated by this project. Although I hate to lose my view, this is not my biggest concern. Moving into this house, we understood that the land behind us could one day be developed, and I work for Caterpillar, so I understand the need for development and progress. However, when we moved here (about 1.5 years ago), we chose Chanhassen after hearing so many great things about the town and seeing how well the town has been planned and the care that’s been taken to maintain the feel and atmosphere. We’re originally from Iowa, but have lived in many places around the world in the past 20 years, and one thing we really appreciate about the Midwest is the intention that goes into city planning. For instance, in many parts of the South, zoning appropriately isn’t the priority that it is in the Midwest, and the look and feel of many towns there suffer as a result. Moving here and exploring Chanhassen, it was apparent that this is not the case here. Although there are medium and even higher density areas in town (which is important), there are appropriate transitions between them which helps the town feel organized and maintains the value of the properties. In fact, in our own area of town, we have medium density housing across the park from us, but due to the park and the road the transition is reasonable and maintains an organized feel to the area. That leads into one of the serious concerns we have about this new planned proposal. Without any reasonable transition between them, this project would build medium density housing within a very short space from our house (nearest building will be 25 feet from our property line). This will lead to exactly the kind of disorganized feel that I 387 described in other parts of the country and will certainly have a detrimental impact on our property values. I understand and believe that part of your job as the city council is to help grow this community, including a variety of housing types, but I also believe it’s a part of your responsibility to protect the property of the current residents. I don’t object to building on this land, but I do think it should be consistent with the current zoning since there is no natural transition between them (like a road, park, or some distance with forest). Secondly, the proposed project includes the construction of a new road that will fiow onto Bluff Creek Drive between Hemlock and Pioneer Trail. The position of this road is on a hill at a curve not far from a busy intersection. A quick drive up Bluff Creek would make it apparent that this is an unsafe place for a new intersection. Additionally, the number of proposed homes in this development will add signiflcant traffic to an already busy residential road with a lot of children in the neighborhood. Again, I’m not opposed to developing this land (though I’d love to see it stay undeveloped), but I would request that this land be zoned to something consistent with the adjacent zoning. Obviously, this will beneflt your constituents in my neighborhood, but I believe it beneflts the town as a whole. It maintains the sense of order and planning that currently exists and will help give confldence to other current and future residents that the city works to protect the community that they are investing in. Regards, Nate Button 388 From: Lindsey Button Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2025 6:53 AM To: lisa@lisaforcarvercounty.com <lisa@lisaforcarvercounty.com>; Maass, Eric <emaass@chanhassenmn.gov>; Ryan, Elise <eryan@chanhassenmn.gov>; von Oven, Mark <mvonoven@chanhassenmn.gov>; Kimber, Josh <jkimber@chanhassenmn.gov>; McDonald, Jerry <jmcdonald@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Pioneer Ridge Proposed Development Dear Elise, Jerry, Haley, Mark, Josh and Eric, My name is Lindsey Button. I am a resident of Chanhassen and I live at 1655 Hemlock Way in the Pioneer Pass neighborhood. I am writing to you today to seek your help regarding a proposed development project that will occur within 20 feet of my backyard as well as many of my neighbors on our street. Our family moved to Chanhassen from out of state. We looked at many different towns in the area and settled on Chanhassen due to its’ national recognition as a great place to live. We have school aged children who have beneflted greatly from the excellent schools in Chanhassen. We appreciate many things about Chanhassen whether it be the small town feel, the vast network of parks and trails, the focus on preserving natural habitat, and we resonate with Chanhassen’s vision to be a community for life, a place we can call home and enjoy living in. When we heard about the development plans of Brandl Anderson to build Pioneer Ridge, a medium density development consisting of 60 homes on 11 acres of land, we were very concerned. This proposal is concerning for many reasons, which I will identify below. The City of Chanhassen’s comprehensive plan lays out in, great detail, the vision going forward for the city. It states, “Chanhassen desires to support low density residential developments in appropriate areas of the community in such a manner as to maintain the aesthetic of the existing single family homes and to create new neighborhoods of similar character and quality. The proposed plan of Pioneer Ridge is an R-8 medium density housing plan with a proposed 60 homes in multi-dwelling structures. The site map and initial layout plans indicate that there would only be a distance of 20 feet in some areas from current residents property line and the physical structure of the buildings. This does not meet the City of Chanhassen’s 389 stated vision of “maintaining aesthetics of the existing single family homes” nor “create new neighborhoods of similar character and quality.” The City of Chanhassen’s comprehensive plan also states that, “Transitions should be created between different land uses. The more incompatible the land uses, the more important the transition zones. Natural features should be used to create transitions between incompatible uses. When these natural features are absent the Land Use Plan supports the creation of buffer yards with increased set backs containing landscaping and berming to improve the separation of incompatible uses. The Pioneer Ridge proposal does not have a transition zone between the two vastly different zoned neighborhoods, nor is there a natural feature, berm, or landscaping indicated on the current plans. The city has made it clear that there must be extra space between the buildings or another natural feature to maintain the aesthetic of the already existing single family homes. The ordinance states 20 feet set back but given the fact that these are two completely different Zones-R-8 vs R-4, it would beneflt both neighborhoods to have a larger transition space with landscaping to create privacy for both neighborhoods. Chanhassen’s comprehensive plan also states that development should be planned to avoid running high traffic volumes through residential neighborhoods. Bluff Creek Drive runs along the west side of Pioneer Pass (my neighborhood), a park, and many more houses before it reaches Audubon Rd. With an addition of 60 new homes, this would drastically increase the amount of traffic on Bluff Creek. The access road to the neighborhood is also concerning as it would intersect with Bluff Creek, an already busy road with many blind corners. This particular access road would come out on a hill, where visibility of oncoming cars would make it difficult to safely turn in and out of the development. With the park across the street, children from the neighborhood frequently cross at the cross walks to get to the park. With signiflcantly increased traffic, there would be increased risk to children and families. My flnal concern is environmental. I have always appreciated how Chanhassen has worked hard to create green space, preserve trees and habitats and maintained clean lakes and creeks. The city’s comprehensive plan states, “Housing development will respect the natural environment of the community while striving to accommodate needs of variety of housing types.” “Chanhassen is committed to increasing the overall tree cover of Chanhassen.” “Chanhassen will preserve wooded areas and natural habitat, existing vegetation, and plant communities wherever possible.” 390 Chanhassen’s commitment to preserving our green spaces and natural habitat does not seem in line with what the developershave planned. They plan to eliminate hundreds of trees of many varieties. They will also destroy the natural habitat for an enormous amount of wildlife that reside in this land, turkeys, foxes, owls, deer, just to name a few that I have seen. Whenever vegetation is destroyed, there is always an environmental problem of soil erosion and sedimentation which the city has stated they will work to minimize throughout Chanhassen. The land is on a hill and all of the erosion will fiow downstream to the creeks and lakes adjacent to the proposed development which will be harmful to both the environment as well as wildlife. I understand this is a lot, but our concerns are also many. Please understand we are not opposed to the city’s vision for development and providing homes of various price points and types for the many types of people who choose Chanhassen as their home. We have two main goals. 1)Approve the proposed development land for an R-4 Low Density Zoning (not R-8) which allows (according to City of Chanhassen Land Use) 1.2-4 units per acre. This would create more space to make a suitable transition spacebetween neighborhoods that would maintain the aesthetic of the current neighborhood, while also allowing opportunities for development of smaller multi family dwellings, and which would lessen the environmental and traffic impact. 2)We invite you to come see the proposed land and see flrsthand how the houses, neighborhood, and environment will be affected by the proposed R-8 development. We would warmly invite you at a time that is convenient for you to visit our neighborhood. I know many of us would really appreciate meeting you and showing you why we love Pioneer Pass and Chanhassen. I can be reached by my email: r or cell: ) to arrange a meeting. I thank you kindly for your time and appreciate your service to our city. I look forward to meeting with you at your convenience. Best Regards, Lindsey Button 391 From: segroskreutz Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2025 5:13 PM To: Maass, Eric <emaass@chanhassenmn.gov>; Ryan, Elise <eryan@chanhassenmn.gov>; von Oven, Mark <mvonoven@chanhassenmn.gov>; Kimber, Josh <jkimber@chanhassenmn.gov>; McDonald, Jerry <jmcdonald@chanhassenmn.gov>; Schubert, Haley <hschubert@chanhassenmn.gov>; lisa@LisaforCarverCounty.com <lisa@LisaforCarverCounty.com> Subject: Pioneer Ridge Proposal I'm writing to express my concern about the proposed Pioneer Ridge development. You are seriously and negatively impacting the values of all homes in this neighborhood by adding rows of townhomes only 25 ft off the existing property lines. This is a family neighborhood where children run free. Property lines are blurred; especially in the backyard area. By adding this much new housing, safety will be a huge factor. There will be extra vehicles on the road and increased cars parked on the streets. Speaking of safety, there is already a blind curve on Bluff Creek. It is near an area where children cross the street to access the park. I fear that by adding more cars, especially with the Avienda development down the road, this will only get worse. And adding a driveway to access the new neighborhood off of Bluff Creek will only increase an already icy intersection. This is also a neighborhood full of wildlife. The location of the new housing will seriously alter the natural landscape. I understand that houses will be built no matter what the neighborhood thinks, but we hope you at least reconsider the placement and size of this development. Sincerely, Sarah Groskreutz 1615 Hemlock Way 392 From: Kristi Habermaier Sent: Monday, January 20, 2025 3:01 PM To: Ryan, Elise <eryan@chanhassenmn.gov>; Schubert, Haley <hschubert@chanhassenmn.gov>; Kimber, Josh <jkimber@chanhassenmn.gov>; McDonald, Jerry <jmcdonald@chanhassenmn.gov>; Maass, Eric <emaass@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Pioneer Ridge Development Hello, My name is Kristi Habermaier. I have been a resident of Pioneer Pass in Chanhassen since 2011. I am writing in regards to the Pioneer Ridge development proposal. I was not able to make the info session last week at the Rec Center due to my work schedule. My husband attended as well as many of my neighbors. After talking with my husband and neighbors, I have some concerns about the proposal. I understand the land has been sold to a developer and it's zoned for residential. However, I do not believe this proposal is in our neighborhood's best interest (or the city's for that matter). My main concern is safety. I have major concerns about adding an entry/exit point to the new development onto Bluff Creek Drive between Pioneer Trail and Hemlock Way. Bluff Creek Drive has seen way more traffic over the past few years than it used to, and it'll only increase once the Avienda construction area is complete. It can be quite difficult to take a left or right onto Bluff Creek from Hemlock as it is now. Many cars drive way too fast past the park and up the hill as well. Visibility is reduced due to the hill and also the trees planted along Bluff Creek. This intersection already scares me. I have a new teen driver and I worry about her being able to safely turn onto Bluff Creek. This is especially tough M- F in the morning hours and later afternoon/evening when kids and parents are commuting to/from school and work. There are also several bus stops on Bluff Creek. The hill heading up Bluff Creek also can get quite icy in the winter. I worry about cars trying to pull into/out of the new development in the winter. My house doesn't back up against the new development. I am on the opposite side of the street. I feel for my neighbors who will have a house that backs up to the townhouses. I don't understand why we need to pack in so many townhouses in such a small area other than to just make money. My neighbor was told by one of the developers, "It could be worse." Yes, it could be worse. I am happy three story townhouses aren't being built, but that doesn't make me feel better. Are there any other single family home developments in 393 Chanhassen where single families (ranging from 500-700k) have townhouses that close in their backyard? It's not fair, and it's dropping home values. The plans I saw have minimal trees between the flrst row of townhouses and most of the Hemlock houses. Why can't we build less townhomes and give our residents on Hemlock the privacy they deserve? The city of Chanhassen has been celebrated as one of the best places to raise a family. I absolutely love living in Chanhassen, but every time I think about this new development it saddens me. It takes a village to raise a family, and my neighborhood in Pioneer Pass is my village. My neighbors are my family, especially the strip of Hemlock being affected. They've helped raise my kids (and continue to do so). We are a tight-knit group. One family, pillars of the neighborhood and original owners, have already sold their house and moved in November due to this new development. I know several more families planning to do the same thing if this proposal goes through. It's devastating and overwhelming to think about my neighborhood (my family) being ripped apart. The message I got from my neighbors who attended last week's information session was that the city "doesn't care." Again, I recognize this land has been sold and will be developed. I ask that you don't accept this current proposal. There needs to be less townhouses with more space between the houses that back up to the townhouses. The entry/exit points into the townhouse area need to be relooked at for safety. Adding a street that enters/exits onto Bluff Creek is not safe. Concerned homeowner, Kristi Habermaier 1664 Hemlock Way Original owner since 2011 394 From: Aaron Pierce Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 8:17 AM To: Maass, Eric <emaass@chanhassenmn.gov>; Ryan, Elise <eryan@chanhassenmn.gov>; von Oven, Mark <mvonoven@chanhassenmn.gov>; Kimber, Josh <jkimber@chanhassenmn.gov>; McDonald, Jerry <jmcdonald@chanhassenmn.gov>; Schubert, Haley <hschubert@chanhassenmn.gov>; lisa@lisaforcarvercounty.com <lisa@LisaforCarverCounty.com> Subject: Concerns regarding Pioneer Ridge development Dear All, I hope you are having a great week. My name is Aaron Pierce and my family and I live on 1695 Hemlock Way. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the Pioneer Ridge Development proposal in Chanhassen, MN. While I understand that development is essential for the growth of our city, I have several concerns about this speciflc proposal: Safety: •The plan to build 60 townhomes in a small area adjacent to existing single-family homes raises signiflcant safety concerns. •Increased traffic: The hill on Bluff Creek between Pioneer Trail and Hemlock Way is already busy and has a blind curve. Adding another intersection to this tight area (that also gets very icy in the winter) would be a huge hazard. •With the new Avienda development traffic also using Bluff Creek as an exit/entrance, there needs to be a much more thorough traffic study done. •Adding potentially 120 additional cars daily will signiflcantly increase the risk of accidents, both vehicular and pedestrian as there is a park across Bluff Creek from the Pioneer Pass neighborhood that sees many children and adults crossing daily. Parking: •There are already parking issues in the townhomes adjacent to Pioneer Pass, with insufficient parking spaces leading to many cars being parked on the street. •There is a potential for townhome residents and guests to park on Hemlock Way and walk through yards to access their homes. Land Erosion and Flooding: 395 •This is already a problem in Pioneer Pass, with homes along the ridge experiencing erosion. •Water runoff from the new townhomes could exacerbate fiooding issues for existing single-family homes. Impact on Existing Home Values: •The proximity of townhome structures to existing single-family homes could negatively impact property values. •The current proposal of 3 story townhomes backing directly up to single family homes has signiflcant implications for property values. •The removal of trees that currently serve as a buffer between the townhomes and existing homes would further diminish the neighborhood's aesthetic appeal. I recognize that the land has been sold and will be developed, which is beneflcial for Chanhassen's growth. However, it is crucial to consider the impact on existing residents and maintain the character of our neighborhood. I propose that the development be modifled to include single-family homes or detached villas instead of rows of townhomes. This change would better align with the beauty and feel of our existing neighborhood. We would like to arrange a meeting with the developer, city council, city planner, and residents of Pioneer Pass neighborhood to discuss these concerns and explore possible alternatives. It would be helpful for the city representatives to see the site in person to really explain and demonstrate our concerns. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerly, Aaron Pierce 396 From: Emily Newman Sent: Monday, December 9, 2024 10:05 PM To: lisa@lisaforcarvercounty.com <lisa@lisaforcarvercounty.com>; Schubert, Haley <hschubert@chanhassenmn.gov>; McDonald, Jerry <jmcdonald@chanhassenmn.gov>; Kimber, Josh <jkimber@chanhassenmn.gov>; von Oven, Mark <mvonoven@chanhassenmn.gov>; Ryan, Elise <eryan@chanhassenmn.gov>; Maass, Eric <emaass@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Concerns Regarding Pioneer Ridge Development Proposal Dear City/County Officials, I hope you’re having a great Friday! My name is Emily Newman, and I live on Hemlock Way. I’m writing to share my concerns about the proposed Pioneer Ridge Development. While I understand the importance of growth, I have several issues with this plan: Safety Concerns: • Traffic & Accessibility: Adding 60 townhomes near existing single-family homes could increase traffic and create safety risks. The hill on Bluff Creek between Pioneer Trail and Hemlock Way is already busy and has a blind curve. Adding another intersection in this area, especially one that’s icy in winter, could be dangerous. • Increased Traffic: With the nearby Avienda development also adding traffic to Bluff Creek, the area could see up to 120 more cars daily. This could increase the risk of accidents, especially with a park across Bluff Creek where children and pedestrians cross regularly. • Traffic Study: I recommend a more thorough traffic study to assess the safety impacts. Removing the Bluff Creek entrance from the development could help alleviate some of these issues. Parking Issues: • There is already a parking shortage in the townhomes near Pioneer Pass, and many cars are parked on the street. If more people park on Hemlock Way and walk through yards to access their homes, it could disrupt the neighborhood. Environmental Concerns: 397 • Erosion & Flooding: Erosion is already an issue for homes along the ridge in Pioneer Pass. Runoff from the new townhomes could worsen fiooding problems for nearby homes. • Tree Removal: The removal of trees that currently serve as a buffer between the proposed development and existing homes could increase erosion and affect the neighborhood’s visual appeal. Impact on Property Values: • The proposed three-story townhomes backing directly onto single-family homes could lower property values and change the neighborhood’s character. • Losing trees and green space would further detract from the beauty of the area and likely harm property values. Proposed Solution: While I understand the need for development, I believe a better solution would be to replace the townhomes with single-family homes or detached villas. This would better match the character of the neighborhood. Request for a Meeting: I would appreciate the opportunity to meet with the developer, city council members, city planners, and other concerned residents to discuss these issues further. A site visit by city representatives would be helpful to better understand and address these concerns. Thank you for your time. I look forward to hearing from you and working together to flnd a solution that beneflts everyone. Sincerely, Emily Newman 398 From: Heather Wendt Sent: Sunday, December 8, 2024 10:00 AM To: Maass, Eric <emaass@chanhassenmn.gov>; Ryan, Elise <eryan@chanhassenmn.gov>; von Oven, Mark <mvonoven@chanhassenmn.gov>; Kimber, Josh <jkimber@chanhassenmn.gov>; McDonald, Jerry <jmcdonald@chanhassenmn.gov>; Schubert, Haley <hschubert@chanhassenmn.gov>; lisa@lisaforcarvercounty.com <lisa@lisaforcarvercounty.com> Subject: Pioneer Ridge Development Concerns Dear All, My name is Heather Wendt, and I live on Marigold Court in Chanhassen. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the Pioneer Ridge Development proposal. While I understand that development is essential for the growth of our city, I have several concerns about this speciflc proposal: Safety: • The plan to build 60 townhomes in a small area adjacent to existing single-family homes raises signiflcant safety concerns. • Increased traffic: The hill on Bluff Creek between Pioneer Trail and Hemlock Way is already busy and has a blind curve. Adding another intersection to this tight area (that also gets very icy in the winter) would be a huge hazard. • With the new Avienda development traffic also using Bluff Creek as an exit/entrance, there needs to be a much more thorough traffic study done. • Adding potentially 120 additional cars daily will signiflcantly increase the risk of accidents, both vehicular and pedestrian as there is a park across Bluff Creek from the Pioneer Pass neighborhood that sees many children and adults crossing daily. Parking: • There are already parking issues in the townhomes adjacent to Pioneer Pass, with insufficient parking spaces leading to many cars being parked on the street. • There is a potential for townhome residents and guests to park on Hemlock Way and walk through yards to access their homes. Land Erosion and Flooding: 399 • This is already a problem in Pioneer Pass, with homes along the ridge experiencing erosion. • Water runoff from the new townhomes could exacerbate fiooding issues for existing single-family homes. Impact on Existing Home Values: • The proximity of townhome structures to existing single-family homes could negatively impact property values. • The current proposal of 3 story townhomes backing directly up to single family homes has signiflcant implications for property values. • The removal of trees that currently serve as a buffer between the townhomes and existing homes would further diminish the neighborhood's aesthetic appeal. I recognize that the land has been sold and will be developed, which is beneflcial for Chanhassen's growth. However, it is crucial to consider the impact on existing residents and maintain the character of our neighborhood. I propose that the development be modifled to include single-family homes or detached villas instead of rows of townhomes. This change would better align with the beauty and feel of our existing neighborhood. We would like to arrange a meeting with the developer, city council, city planner, and residents of Pioneer Pass neighborhood to discuss these concerns and explore possible alternatives. It would be helpful for the city representatives to see the site in person to really explain and demonstrate our concerns. Regards, Heather Wendt 400 From: Kristyn Vickman Sent: Friday, December 6, 2024 11:38:59 AM To: Ryan, Elise <eryan@chanhassenmn.gov>; von Oven, Mark <mvonoven@chanhassenmn.gov>; Kimber, Josh <jkimber@chanhassenmn.gov>; McDonald, Jerry <jmcdonald@chanhassenmn.gov>; Schubert, Haley <hschubert@chanhassenmn.gov>; lisa@lisaforcarvercounty.com <lisa@lisaforcarvercounty.com> Subject: Pioneer Ridge Development Hello, My name is Kristyn Vickman, and I live on Hemlock Way in Chanhassen. I am writing to express my concerns regarding the Pioneer Ridge Development proposal in Chanhassen (adjacent to my neighborhood). While I understand that development is essential for the growth of our city, I have several concerns about this speciflc proposal: Safety: • The plan to build 60 townhomes in a small area adjacent to existing single-family homes raises signiflcant safety concerns. • Increased traffic: The hill on Bluff Creek between Pioneer Trail and Hemlock Way is already busy and has a blind curve. Adding another intersection to this tight area (that also gets very icy in the winter) would be a huge hazard. • With the new Avienda development traffic also using Bluff Creek as an exit/entrance, there needs to be a much more thorough traffic study done. • Adding potentially 120 additional cars daily will signiflcantly increase the risk of accidents, both vehicular and pedestrian as there is a park across Bluff Creek from the Pioneer Pass neighborhood that sees many children and adults crossing daily. Impact on Existing Home Values: • The proximity of townhome structures to existing single-family homes could negatively impact property values. • The current proposal of 3 story townhomes backing directly up to single family 401 homes has signiflcant implications for property values. • The removal of trees that currently serve as a buffer between the townhomes and existing homes would further diminish the neighborhood's aesthetic appeal. • The proposed set-backs for the townhomes to the single family homes are far too short. The existing homes deserve to have a larger buffer in addition to landscaping between the developments. Land Erosion and Flooding: • This is already a problem in Pioneer Pass, with homes along the ridge experiencing erosion. • Water runoff from the new townhomes could exacerbate fiooding issues for existing single-family homes. I recognize that the land has been sold and will be developed, which is beneflcial for Chanhassen's growth. However, it is crucial to consider the impact on existing residents and maintain the character of our neighborhood. We would like to arrange a meeting with the developer, city council, city planner, and residents of Pioneer Pass neighborhood to discuss these concerns and explore possible alternatives. It would be helpful for the city representatives to see the site in person to really explain and demonstrate our concerns. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Kristyn Vickman Realtor® I Edina Realty 612.227.0009 402 From: Katie Newman Sent: Friday, December 6, 2024 10:31 AM To: lisa@LisaforCarverCounty.com <lisa@LisaforCarverCounty.com>; Schubert, Haley <hschubert@chanhassenmn.gov>; McDonald, Jerry <jmcdonald@chanhassenmn.gov>; Kimber, Josh <jkimber@chanhassenmn.gov>; von Oven, Mark <mvonoven@chanhassenmn.gov>; Ryan, Elise <eryan@chanhassenmn.gov>; Maass, Eric <emaass@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Concerns Regarding Pioneer Ridge Development Proposal Dear City & County Officials, Happy Friday! My name is Katie Newman, and I am a resident of Hemlock Way. My family and I moved here from Eden Prairie in 2022 and have fallen in love with the Chanhassen community. I am reaching out today to share my concerns about the proposed Pioneer Ridge Development in Chanhassen. While I understand that growth and development are important for our city’s progress, I have several speciflc concerns regarding this proposal: Safety Concerns: • Traffic and Accessibility: The plan to add 60 townhomes near existing single-family homes raises signiflcant safety issues. The hill on Bluff Creek, between Pioneer Trail and Hemlock Way, already experiences heavy traffic and has a blind curve. Introducing another intersection in this area—especially one that tends to get icy in the winter—could create a dangerous situation. • Increased Traffic Volume: The nearby Avienda development is expected to increase traffic on Bluff Creek, which already serves as a primary route for local residents. With up to 120 additional cars daily, the risk of accidents, both vehicular and pedestrian, could increase, particularly with a park across Bluff Creek that is frequented by children and pedestrians. • Traffic Study: Given the anticipated increase in traffic, I believe a more thorough traffic study should be conducted to ensure safety for all. I see many of these 403 issues resolving with the elimination of the Bluff Creek entrance to the planned development. Parking Issues: • Current Parking Shortage: The townhomes adjacent to Pioneer Pass are already experiencing parking challenges, with many vehicles being parked on the street due to a lack of available spaces. • Impact on Hemlock Way: There is concern that future residents and guests may park on Hemlock Way and walk through yards to access their homes, further disrupting the neighborhood. Environmental Concerns: • Land Erosion and Flooding: Erosion is already an issue in Pioneer Pass, particularly for homes along the ridge. The water runoff from new townhomes could worsen fiooding problems for existing homes in the area. • Environmental Impact: The removal of trees that currently act as a buffer between the proposed development and existing homes may exacerbate both erosion and visual disruption. Impact on Property Values: • Proximity of Townhomes: The proposed three-story townhomes backing directly onto single-family homes could negatively affect property values. The development’s height and density may also alter the neighborhood’s aesthetic appeal and overall character. • Loss of Green Space: The loss of trees, which currently provide a natural buffer, could further detract from the beauty of the neighborhood and potentially diminish property values. Proposed Solution: While I recognize the value of development for the city’s growth, it is important to balance this with the needs and concerns of current residents. I would like to propose an alternative to the current development plan—one that includes single-family homes or detached villas rather than rows of townhomes. This change would better align with the character and aesthetic of the surrounding area. 404 Request for Meeting: I would appreciate the opportunity to meet with the developer, city council members, city planners, and other concerned residents to discuss these issues in more detail. It would be incredibly helpful for city representatives to visit the site in person so they can better understand and address the concerns raised by the community. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response and to the possibility of working together to flnd a solution that beneflts everyone. Sincerely, Katie Newman 405 From: Katie Newman Sent: Friday, January 17, 2025 10:01 PM To: lisa@LisaforCarverCounty.com <lisa@LisaforCarverCounty.com>; Schubert, Haley <hschubert@chanhassenmn.gov>; McDonald, Jerry <jmcdonald@chanhassenmn.gov>; Kimber, Josh <jkimber@chanhassenmn.gov>; von Oven, Mark <mvonoven@chanhassenmn.gov>; Ryan, Elise <eryan@chanhassenmn.gov>; Maass, Eric <emaass@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Re: Concerns Regarding Pioneer Ridge Development Proposal Hi all - I got the opportunity to attend the meeting held by Brandl on Tuesday and it raised some new concerns we’d like you all to note: 1. they mentioned having to move the current sidewalk along Pioneer to make room for their development. This sidewalk is already quite close to the road and moving it even closer is bound to pose some safety risks. 2. Removing all but one existing trees between the proposed development and the current Pioneer Pass neighborhood is eliminating all sense of privacy. 3. Entrance off Bluff Creek to new development poses safety risks. They stated they did “traffic studies” but didn’t elaborate on how they will ensure safety. This road gets extremely slippery in the winter and with it being a blind curve, I am highly concerned for auto accidents as well as pedestrian safety. 4. The Pioneer Pass city park is already overwhelmed with traffic and adding another 120+ residence will further overwhelm this resource. 5. I understand this is land that will be developed on but it is sad to see a wildlife sanctuary get destroyed by this. There are many, many animals that use this space and we will be destroying their homes. I appreciate you hearing my concerns and look forward to continuing the conversation. Katie Newman From: Katie Newman < Sent: Friday, December 6, 2024 10:31:37 AM To: lisa@LisaforCarverCounty.com <lisa@LisaforCarverCounty.com>; hschubert@chanhassenmn.gov <hschubert@chanhassenmn.gov>; jmcdonald@chanhassenmn.gov <jmcdonald@chanhassenmn.gov>; jkimber@chanhassenmn.gov <jkimber@chanhassenmn.gov>; 406 mvonoven@chanhassenmn.gov <mvonoven@chanhassenmn.gov>; eryan@chanhassenmn.gov <eryan@chanhassenmn.gov>; emaass@chanhassenmn.gov <emaass@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Concerns Regarding Pioneer Ridge Development Proposal Dear City & County Officials, Happy Friday! My name is Katie Newman, and I am a resident of Hemlock Way. My family and I moved here from Eden Prairie in 2022 and have fallen in love with the Chanhassen community. I am reaching out today to share my concerns about the proposed Pioneer Ridge Development in Chanhassen. While I understand that growth and development are important for our city’s progress, I have several speciflc concerns regarding this proposal: Safety Concerns: • Traffic and Accessibility: The plan to add 60 townhomes near existing single-family homes raises signiflcant safety issues. The hill on Bluff Creek, between Pioneer Trail and Hemlock Way, already experiences heavy traffic and has a blind curve. Introducing another intersection in this area—especially one that tends to get icy in the winter—could create a dangerous situation. • Increased Traffic Volume: The nearby Avienda development is expected to increase traffic on Bluff Creek, which already serves as a primary route for local residents. With up to 120 additional cars daily, the risk of accidents, both vehicular and pedestrian, could increase, particularly with a park across Bluff Creek that is frequented by children and pedestrians. • Traffic Study: Given the anticipated increase in traffic, I believe a more thorough traffic study should be conducted to ensure safety for all. I see many of these issues resolving with the elimination of the Bluff Creek entrance to the planned development. Parking Issues: 407 • Current Parking Shortage: The townhomes adjacent to Pioneer Pass are already experiencing parking challenges, with many vehicles being parked on the street due to a lack of available spaces. • Impact on Hemlock Way: There is concern that future residents and guests may park on Hemlock Way and walk through yards to access their homes, further disrupting the neighborhood. Environmental Concerns: • Land Erosion and Flooding: Erosion is already an issue in Pioneer Pass, particularly for homes along the ridge. The water runoff from new townhomes could worsen fiooding problems for existing homes in the area. • Environmental Impact: The removal of trees that currently act as a buffer between the proposed development and existing homes may exacerbate both erosion and visual disruption. Impact on Property Values: • Proximity of Townhomes: The proposed three-story townhomes backing directly onto single-family homes could negatively affect property values. The development’s height and density may also alter the neighborhood’s aesthetic appeal and overall character. • Loss of Green Space: The loss of trees, which currently provide a natural buffer, could further detract from the beauty of the neighborhood and potentially diminish property values. Proposed Solution: While I recognize the value of development for the city’s growth, it is important to balance this with the needs and concerns of current residents. I would like to propose an alternative to the current development plan—one that includes single-family homes or detached villas rather than rows of townhomes. This change would better align with the character and aesthetic of the surrounding area. Request for Meeting: I would appreciate the opportunity to meet with the developer, city council members, city planners, and other concerned residents to discuss these issues in more detail. It would be 408 incredibly helpful for city representatives to visit the site in person so they can better understand and address the concerns raised by the community. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response and to the possibility of working together to flnd a solution that beneflts everyone. Sincerely, Katie Newman 409 From: Wong, Erin < Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2025 10:51 AM To: Maass, Eric <emaass@chanhassenmn.gov>; Ryan, Elise <eryan@chanhassenmn.gov> Cc: Hokkanen, Laurie <lhokkanen@chanhassenmn.gov>; Howley, Charles <chowley@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: RE: {External} Re: {External} Re: Pioneer Ridge Good Morning Eric and Elise, I hope you have/had a wonderful long weekend! I’m following up on this email chain as I attended the Brandl Anderson open house on Tuesday which I really appreciated them having, but I sense there is little room for community input or proposed changes (although I did appreciate Eric Maass providing the opportunity to list what we are concerned about and am hopeful the city will take our concerns into consideration). I am not happy with the current proposal and would appreciate your consideration of my concerns: When we voiced our concerns with how close the buildings will be to existing single family homes and asked if they could consider putting single family homes there, they said that it’s the city’s requirement they need to meet and wouldn’t be able to meet it if they moved the proposed rows of townhomes further from existing single family homes, and they deflnitely could not do single family homes and meet the requirement. From what I understand, this was zoned this way in 2020, but I don’t recall residents being made aware of this. Per your response below, they just need to have 4 homes per acre, but they pointed at the city requirement to say they couldn’t do it. They also said they could have packed even more homes in and they didn’t (which felt very dismissive of our concerns as if we should be happy with the current proposal as it could have been worse). •Is this truly a city requirement that Chanhassen is required to hold fast to, or is this something that could be revised? I also asked if there were any examples of rows of town homes built directly behind existing single family homes as I have been looking as I drive through Chanhassen, Chaska, and Eden Prairie and I haven’t seen any. They flrst said, there are townhomes everywhere in the city, this is no different, but I pointed out that I haven’t seen any single-family homes with townhomes in their back yard. They were unable to provide me with any examples. I am concerned that this will decrease home values signiflcantly, ruin the look and feel of our 410 neighborhood, increase traffic signiflcantly, have the potential for visitors to park on our street (Hemlock Way) and walk through yards to get to the townhomes, and increase accidents (along with all the other concerns I have also voiced). I also asked how many renters will be allowed and they said 1 per building which means they could potentially have 25% renters. Renters are not permanent residents and typically do not care for their property the same as someone who owns their property, so I have concerns with this as well (I have personal experience with this from when I lived in a townhome for 7 years as well as my mom’s current experience in her townhome in Chanhassen as she has a rental unit next door. Her association actually dropped the number of allowed renters due to issues). •MAIN ASK: I would appreciate it if a representative from the City Council, or either of you would be willing to meet myself and potentially other neighbors to view the proposed development location in the next couple weeks so that we can show you our concerns visually and in person. How would I go about scheduling this? I assume the city council meeting will be too late to discuss concerns so I would appreciate if this could be scheduled before that meeting. Some other questions I have: •How will the citizens of Chanhassen know our concerns are being addressed? •What avenues of input do we have? •Would a petition be necessary in order to be heard? •Could we consider a similar zoning to the neighborhood off Pioneer Trail in Eden Prairie that faces Lake Riley? This is also a small sliver of land and has two rows of single family homes with plenty of room between. This could keep with the look and feel of this neighborhood and reduce the chance of lowered home values. I hope you have a wonderful day and thank you for your consideration. Kind Regards, Erin 411 Merry Christmas and Happy Holiday to you and your families. Nancy and I live on Hemlock Way in Pioneer Pass. We are writing to express our concern regarding the Pioneer Ridge Development proposal in Chanhassen, MN. We understand the property has been sold to Brandl Anderson and a new townhouse development is proposed to be built soon. The Pioneer Pass homeowners, and especially those that butt up against the new development property, knew one day, this beautiful piece of land that buffers Pioneer Pass and Pioner Trail would be utilized. Our hope would be a peaceful new single row of similar single-family homes, not 60 townhouses in a small, condensed area. We decided to purchase our home on Hemlock Way in 2013 because of the spectacular view, the extended back yard (albeit state owned) and the peacefulness that my wife and I needed entering our senior years. We’ve enjoyed seeing the wildlife living, moving, and growing over the last 11 years and especially enjoy seeing the deer at dusk and dawn most days. While we understand that development is essential for the growth of our city, we have several concerns about this specific proposal: 1) We understand there is already a plan to build 60 townhomes. We’ve seen the layout, and quite frankly, feel the design is extraordinarily aggressive based on the space between Pioneer Trail and the homes on Hemlock Way. Have you walked the property? 60 townhomes, approximately 180 people, and approximately 120 cars plus traffic crammed in that small area? These townhomes would have to be small and the road(s) would be tight. Congestion and all of the negative factors that come with it will be visibly and audibly concerning to both new residents and the existing homeowners. 2) Smaller townhomes crammed in a tight corner would bring on unnecessary implications to the existing Pioneer Pass homeowners, including but not limited to reduced property values. We assume the developers are not concerned with this but feel the State, County, and City of Chanhassen would have substantial concern. None of the existing homeowners are in favor of any type of reduction of home values especially when this could be avoided by an upgrade from unwanted townhomes to similar single-family homes. 3) Under the existing proposed development, the townhomes are way too close to the houses they back up against. Forcing two rows of townhouses in that small area in order to maximize profits is foolish and unwelcome. A single row of single-family homes would not have the same negative aesthetic affect. An easement of at least 25 feet should be considered between the existing property line and the new property line. There are mature trees on the land now. The Developer wants to replace them with 3’ trees bordering the property lines. A berm or larger trees should be considered. 412 4) Adding 60 small unwanted townhomes and 120 cars, trucks, and SUV’s will introduce traffic not only in that small, condensed area but will add traffic concerns to an already dangerous intersection entering the neighborhood on the Bluff Creek side. Blind spots due to hills and curves will provide higher potential for vehicle and pedestrian accidents. 5) Not only would we project 120 cars to be in constant motion throughout the day and night, but visitor parking would complicate matters even more. More traffic, more noise, more safety issues. Additionally, there are more potential safety concerns between 60 crammed townhomes and the existing Pioneer Pass homeowners. If you have not walked the area, I encourage you to do so. It’s a beautiful piece of property that aligns Pioneer Trail to include wildlife and children’s activity in both the winter and the summer. The residents of Pioneer Pass can accept this loss, but this is an extremely tough pill to swallow hearing that this great piece of land will be replaced by 60 townhomes and 120 people. This letter, and I am sure many more, recognize that this development is crucial to the City of Chanhassen’s growth. No argument. However, utilizing this space for rows of unwanted townhomes doesn’t seem to be the best choice here. A single row of similar single-family homes with similar values would be beneficial to the city and the current taxpaying residence of Pioneer Pass. In summary, we hope the City and this committee would consider the negative impact for this development: increased safety issues, lower values of existing homes, preservation of existing mature trees, distance between the proper lines, and the impact on wildlife. This proposed development has already caused some families to list their homes and to sell due to the issues pointed out above. Please reconsider the effect of an abundance of townhomes versus a row of similar single-family homes. Thank you for your consideration. Dan & Nancy Gilmore 1705 Hemlock Way 413 From: Chanhassen Website Team <webmaster@Chanhassenmn.gov> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 6:08 PM To: Maass, Eric <emaass@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Concerns with development at Pioneer Pass and Bluff Creek Blvd Message submitted from the <Chanhassen, MN> website. Site Visitor Name: Zhexin Zhang Site Visitor Email: Hi Eric, I'd like to raise my concerns about the density of the townhouse development at Pioneer Pass and Bluff Creek Blvd. With a high density development, I am concerned about the traffic along Bluff Creek Blvd, as well as the sight lines for safe turning in and out of the proposed development due to significant gradient of the street. Also, Bluff Creek Blvd is already a busy street so limiting additional traffic will be beneficial for existing residents in the area. This is especial important considering the children foot traffic for crossing the street to Pioneer Pass Park. Thank you for reading and if this could please be passed on to the Planning Commission and City Council, it will be much appreciated. Best, Zhexin 414 From: Glen Schoenberg Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 3:13 PM To: Ryan, Elise <eryan@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Proposed Pioneer Ridge Development Dear Mayor Ryan, Thank you for coming out to the proposed development site on February 6th! My name is Glen Schoenberg, and I have been a proud resident of Chanhassen since 2011, residing at 1665 Hemlock Way. I am writing to express my deep concerns regarding the proposed development of Pioneer Ridge. For nearly 14 years, my family and I have cherished our life in Chanhassen. My oldest boys, who were just two years old when we moved here, are now sixteen and sophomores at Chanhassen High School. My youngest son, born here, is nine years old and a fourth grader at Bluff Creek Elementary. We have loved living in Chanhassen for many reasons, but none more important than the strong sense of community and neighborhood feeling that deflnes our city. I have several concerns about the proposed development, and I would like to address three of them here. 1. Safety Concerns: The proposed road leading to Bluff Creek Drive and the lack of parking in the development raise signiflcant safety issues. The road connecting this development to Bluff Creek Drive is on a hill and curve with limited sight lines, which become extremely slippery during winter. The traffic study conflrms that even with excavation and grading, the recommended sight lines for an intersection cannot be achieved. The Hemlock Way intersection, which is closest to this proposed road, already has limited sight lines due to curves, making it dangerous. This new intersection would be in an even worse position. Additionally, the limited visitor parking spaces in this proposed development will lead to illegal parking on the development streets and overfiow parking in the Pioneer Pass neighborhood, congesting the intersection and creating a more dangerous situation for children crossing the road to go to the park. The lack of parking may also result in Pioneer Ridge residents and visitors parking further down Hemlock Way from the intersection at Bluff Creek Drive and then cutting through yards to access the townhouse development. With my 30 years of experience in the physical security industry that including my military background and certiflcation as a Physical Security Professional through ASIS 415 International, I can attest that this scenario poses a signiflcant safety and security risk for existing residents. 2. Lack of Green Space: Chanhassen residents have chosen this city for its thoughtful neighborhood design and incorporated green spaces. The proposed development of 60 townhouses on this narrow piece of land, which includes undevelopable areas, lacks any signiflcant green space. Over the years, Chanhassen has seen a signiflcant increase in applications for zoning permits for new infrastructure. This rampant growth is pushing nature out and reducing the open spaces that our community holds dear. According to respected urban planners, cities should retain a balance between architecture and green spaces to maintain environmental health and residents' quality of life (Johnsen, 2018). 3. Impact on Neighborhood Character: Building a townhouse development so close to a single-family neighborhood disrupts the quaint environment and introduces a metropolitan atmosphere, I would have parts of six dwelling looking into my property, with an average of six dwellings looking into two properties in the back along the property lines. While I understand that this land will be developed, I am opposed to building a townhouse development here without a reasonable transition from the existing single-family neighborhood. I have not found any examples of such a development in Chanhassen. Even the developer admitted during the neighborhood meeting that they have never seen or done a townhouse development so close to a single-family neighborhood. One of the qualities that attracted us to Chanhassen when we moved here from the Washington DC area was the city's quality layout of residential areas. Chanhassen has set a precedent for preserving neighborhood appeal and ensuring respectable transitions between different types of neighborhood densities. This proposed development contradicts every neighborhood in Chanhassen and sets a dangerous new precedent for future development. Chanhassen’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan supports the standard we are used to, speciflcally in Land Use section 1.7.1, Goal 1, which states, “Support low-density residential development in appropriate areas of the community in such a manner as to maintain the aesthetic of existing single-family areas, and to create new neighborhoods of similar character and quality.” The plan also calls for transitions and buffer yards with increased setbacks between neighborhoods of different densities. This proposed development directly contradicts both statements. I have heard it stated that since this area is guided for medium density in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the landowner has the right to build what they want. I challenge that statement, as the 2040 Comprehensive Plan has confiicting statements about the la nd's 416 use between the Land Guide and Land Use Goals. The Comprehensive Plan states that it is designed to serve as a guide for local decision-making and is a fiexible tool that can be adapted to new policies to attain stated goals. With these concerns in mind, and the recent announcement of the Met Council scaling back on density requirements, I urge you to consider alternate solutions for the development of this land. A couple of options could be: • Amend the 2040 Comprehensive Plan to designate this area for low-density housing that would integrate into the existing neighborhood and uphold the precedent Chanhassen has set over the years. • Change the design from townhomes to duplexes or small lot single family homes that would better transition from the existing neighborhood to this development. • Reduce the number of houses being built to increase the transition area and create a respectable buffer between neighborhoods, even if that means granting the developer an exemption to the zoning requirements. • At minimum: o There needs to be a 6-foot berm with evergreen trees along the border between the neighborhoods to create a year-round buffer to help alleviate drainage from the proposed development into the existing properties and help with noise and light pollution. o Remove the Northern most set of 6 townhomes that have the closest setback from the existing houses to create additional green space, parking spaces and room for a respectable buffer. As a citizen of Chanhassen, I implore the city council not to approve the pending zoning permit application for new construction. This decision will help preserve natural elements, ensure our green spaces are protected, and maintain our city's character rather than transforming it into a concrete jungle. Thank you for taking the time to read my letter. Sincerely, Glen Schoenberg 417 From: Matt Wilde Sent: Friday, February 14, 2025 3:18 PM To: Maass, Eric <emaass@chanhassenmn.gov>; Ryan, Elise <eryan@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Re: Pioneer Ridge Development Concerns Mayor Ryan - Thank you again for coming out to our neighborhood to walk the proposed property a few weeks back. Hope you warmed up by now… I’m unable to attend the upcoming planning meeting because of work travel, but wanted to re-emphasize my main concerns. I included my original e-mail below that goes into greater detail, but here’s my biggest concerns: 1. Lack of distance and transition from existing single-family homes. (My home is the closest of all homes, even with the updated setback). 2. The developer purchased a very small parcel of land, especially when considering the slopes that make the majority of space unusable. While I understand the need for the developer to be profltable, it should not happen at the expense of existing homeowners. Under the current plan, that’s exactly what is happening. 3. I have signiflcant concerns around the future drainage issues. We already have water issues because of the clay soil and that problem will only be increased with an additional 60 homes and roads. For years, we tried to put in a pool in our yard but was not approved by the city because of non-permeable surface concerns. Now, the city is allowing acres of buildings. I worry about the repercussions of this building on both my home and yard and how that will be handled in the future if there are issues. Lastly, I’m not sure how the calculation is made, but the developer purchased 12 acres of land, but not all of that purchased land is usable, or even included on the updated plan. (A large portion of the land they bought is on top of the hill to the easy of the proposal) Those 60 homes are put on a very small portion of the 12 acres, making the density higher than stated. As you drive up and down Pioneer Trail throughout all of Chanhassen, there are trees, wetlands, and prairie from Eden Prairie all the way to Chaska. This will be the one place on Pioneer Trail that has higher density homes. 418 I appreciate your attention to an important matter, both for current neighbors, but also the precedent this sets on future Chanhassen growth. Thanks Matt Wilde 1685 Hemlock Way On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 11:16 AM Matt Wilde < > wrote: To all interested parties - I’m writing with concerns about the proposed development of Pioneer Ridge, as a direct neighbor. Many of my neighbors have sent a list of concerns that has been drafted cooperatively, so I won’t re-send those, although I share the same concerns. I want to highlight a few of my biggest concerns about the proposed development: • Proximity to existing homes and related issues: The proposal by Brandl Anderson places a signiflcant amount of medium density homes directly behind existing low- density homes with no buffer. Other developments in Carver County have included some sort of buffer, whether it be trees, berms or other natural transitions. Examples include a berm with tall trees that was built in the Avienda border, maintaining trees and more space in the new development on Audubon in Chaska and many others. Section 1.7.2 of the Chanhassen 2040 plan cites “The city will promote the mixing of housing densities…. Such mixed densities must provide appropriate transitions for existing development. • Flooding concerns: When Pioneer Pass was built, the backyards on the south side of the development were essentially swamps. Additional drainage was added after the project (by the developer) was completed but when heavy rains occur, backyards are wet for extended periods. In addition, the area that is being developed is often plagued by water, even from the lightest rains. There has been signiflcant settling and I worry that not only will the additional homes and changed drainage will cause additional impacts to my property, but also impacts to the newly developed structures. When asking Brandl Anderson about the issue during the open house, they essentially said that if the development results in additional fiooding, we will need to work with the City. 419 • Destruction of property value: No matter what, this development will result in lower property values. When my home was purchased, I paid a premium for the unobstructed view. Construction of structures in such close proximity to existing developments, speciflcally with the planned height, will considerably decrease property value. • Traffic: There is so much growth in the area, between Avienda, the proposed development to the south of Pioneer Trail, and the future light commercial on Pioneer Trail, that putting two new entrances to the neighborhood combined with this new traffic is likely to cause congestion and backup issues. • Tree removal: The property that is being developed has signiflcant amounts of mature trees that will need to be removed. These trees provide shade (another goal of the Chanhassen 2040 plan) as well as habitats for bald eagles, owls and many other birds. The proposed trees that are to be conserved are entirely on non- buildable portions of the property. Instead of just bringing up issues, I want to propose some ideas to help with the issues: • Instituting a solution to follow the 2040 Plan of providing transitions for existing developments. This could include berms, trees or other separation ideas. • Larger set back from the existing neighborhood to help protect property values and simultaneously maintain/create more of a buffer between development types through existing trees that would no longer be removed and new features to separate housing. • Pushing the development closer to Pioneer Trail to alleviate the overlapping of the existing and proposed development. • Measuring the density requirements only using the true buildable space on this property. • Decreasing the number of units and only putting homes on the southside of the proposed road parallel to Pioneer Trail. • Imposing size restrictions of the new homes, speciflcally height of new homes. Brandl Anderson bought a parcel of land that is extremely small in terms of buildable space. The lack of buildable space on this land results in concentration into one area to meet the zoning requirements. I understand the need for them to be profltable in this 420 development, but the profltability should not be at the expense of current residents, both in quality of their property or real value decreases. I am aware that Chanhassen will continue to grow and that it can beneflt all residents, I’d ask the City Leadership to consider some of the issues that have been brought up both in this message and in the broader Pioneer Pass communications from the community. Would be happy to discuss or expand on any of these issues. Appreciate your attention to an important issue. Matt Wilde 421 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item Approve Purchase Agreement and Gift Agreement to acquire property for Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center File No.Item No: H.2 Agenda Section GENERAL BUSINESS Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen authorizes entering into a Purchase Agreement for the Sale of the real property consisting of a portion of Outlot E, Avienda Townhomes, Carver County, Minnesota, located in Chanhassen, MN and Gift Agreement with Level 7 Development for land to build the Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY The City of Chanhassen is building a new community center. The project is fully described here: https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/government/projects/chanhassen-bluffs-community-center Construction on the facility is expected to begin in the Spring of 2026, with completion of the facility by May 2028. The city will acquire 13.1 acres in the Avienda development at Powers and Hwy 212 to build the facility. The property is a portion of PID 25-0960440, which is currently an Outlot. BACKGROUND The city is represented by Jay Lindgren of Dorsey and Whitney on this matter. 422 The City Council met in closed session on November 25, 2024 and January 27, 2025 to consider the terms of the land acquisition. The city entered into a letter of intent and Gift Agreement that is consistent with this PA on March 10, 2025. The property is currently being platted. The preliminary plat will be considered by public hearing at the Planning Commission on May6, 2025 and by the City Council on May 12, 2025. The project page is: https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/departments/community-development/planning/proposed- development-projects/chanhassen-bluffs The city will also acquire the future stormwater pond in the southwest corner of what is currently Outlot E, approximately 1.8 acres, for a cost of zero dollars ($0). DISCUSSION BUDGET The Purchase Agreement calls for $70,000 in escrow funds to be deposited with the seller. The escrow funds will be applied to the purchase amount. The purchase will be funded (net, after gift) with $2.1M in fund balance (cash on hand) and approximately $7.1M (plus closing and other administrative costs) in bonds to be repaid with the proceeds of the local option sales tax that goes into effect on April 1, 2025 and was approved by Chanhassen voters at the November election. The city will also be responsible for paying the prorated property taxes for the property from the date of closing through December 31, 2025. The property will be tax-exempt thereafter. The intent is to close on the property in late June or early July. The city intends to issue approximately $13.185M in temporary bonds to fund the land acquisition and early soft costs such as design services. The city is advised on the bond sale by Ehlers Public Finance Advisors and represented by TAFT Law. More information on the bond issuance process is available on this agenda under the item titled, "Approve Resolution Rescinding Resolution No. 2025-24 Adopted on March 24, 2025; and Approving the Authorization for the Issuance and Sale of an Amount Not to Exceed $13,185,000 General Obligation Temporary Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2025A." RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends authorizing the City of Chanhassen to enter into the Purchase Agreement. ATTACHMENTS Purchase Agreement Letter of Intent City of Chanhassen and Level 7 Gift Agreement 423 1010843.v2 PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT This PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made as of _____________, 2025, (the “Effective Date”) by and between Level 7 Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Seller”), and the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Buyer”). For and in consideration of this Agreement, of the mutual undertakings contained herein, and of other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby mutually acknowledged by the parties hereto, Seller and Buyer agree as follows: 1.Sale of Property. Seller agrees to sell to Buyer, and Buyer agrees to buy from Seller, that certain real property containing approximately 13 acres of land, located in the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, and approximately outlined on Exhibit A-1 attached hereto, together with all improvements thereon and easements and rights benefiting or appurtenant thereto (the “Property”). The Property comprises a portion of Outlot E, Avienda Townhomes, Carver County, Minnesota (“Outlot E”). Outlot E is an approximately 22.79 acre parcel of property owned by Seller and is depicted on Exhibit A-2 attached hereto. It is acknowledged that Outlot E must be replatted for the Property to constitute a separate legal parcel, and that the exact boundaries and size of the Property will be as set forth on the Replat (as defined in Section 5 below). 2.Purchase Price and Manner of Payment. The total purchase price (the “Purchase Price”) to be paid for the Property is $1,000,000 per gross acre, subject to any prorations or adjustments set forth in this Agreement. The Property is approximately 13 acres, but the final acreage of the Property shall be determined by the Replat prior to Closing, and the Purchase Price shall be set in accordance with the actual acreage. 2.1 The Purchase Price is payable as follows: 2.1.1 $70,000.00 as earnest money (together with interest accruing thereon, the “Earnest Money”) shall be deposited by Buyer in escrow with First American Title Insurance Company, 121 South 8th Street, Suite 1250, Minneapolis MN 55402, Attn: Nicole Haapala (“Title Company”) within five (5) Business Days following the Effective Date and held pursuant to the terms of the Escrow Agreement in the form attached hereto at Exhibit B and this Agreement. The Earnest Money shall be appliable to the Purchase Price at Closing; and 2.1.2 The balance of the Purchase Price, after application of the Earnest Money and subject to any prorations and adjustments set forth in this Agreement, in cash or by wire transfer of funds on the Closing Date. 2.2 Cash Contribution by Seller to Buyer. At Closing, Seller shall make a cash charitable contribution to the Buyer in the amount of Three Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($300,000.00) per acre (the “Seller’s Cash Contribution”) to assist with the cost of acquiring the Property and for design and construction of the corresponding project to be constructed by Buyer on the Property, as further set forth in that certain Gift Agreement between Seller and Buyer dated as of the date hereof. 424 -2- 1010843.v2 3.Due Diligence Period.For purposes of this Agreement, the “Due Diligence Period” shall be the period commencing on the Effective Date and terminating on the date which is ninety (90) days after the Effective Date. 3.1 Access and Inspection; Tenant Interviews. Buyer and Buyer’s agents shall have access to the Property at all times prior to the Closing for the purpose of Buyer’s investigation and testing of the same. Buyer shall pay all costs and expenses of such investigation and testing, shall repair any damage to the Property to the extent caused by such investigation and testing, and shall hold Seller and the Property harmless from all costs and liabilities to the extent such costs and liabilities are caused by Buyer’s investigation and testing of the Property; provided, however, that Buyer shall have no liability or indemnity obligation with respect to any release or any condition of the Property that are merely discovered by Buyer. Prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer must be satisfied in its sole discretion with the condition and all other aspects of the Property and the results of all tests and investigations performed by Buyer or on Buyer’s behalf. 3.2 Document Review. Seller shall deliver to Buyer copies of all diligence items listed in Exhibit C to the extent in Seller’s possession or control (collectively, the “Due Diligence Materials”) within ten (10) Business Days after the execution of this Agreement (the “Delivery Deadline”). If Seller has not delivered all Due Diligence Materials to Buyer by the Delivery Deadline, then the Due Diligence Period shall be extended on a day for day basis until the Document Delivery Date (as hereinafter defined). The date that Seller notifies Buyer that Seller has delivered all of the Due Diligence Materials to Buyer shall be deemed the “Document Delivery Date” unless, within two (2) Business Days after such Seller notice to Buyer, Buyer delivers to Seller a written objection to Seller’s notice containing a detailed itemizing of the Due Diligence Materials that Buyer claims that Seller has not delivered to Buyer. Prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer must be satisfied in its sole discretion with the condition and all other aspects of the Due Diligence Materials. 4.Title Examination. 4.1 Seller’s Title Evidence. Seller shall deliver to Buyer, within ten(10)Business Days after the Effective Date: (a) a commitment for an ALTA 2006 Form Owner’s Policy of Title Insurance insuring title to the Property in the amount of the Purchase Price, issued by the Title Company (the “Title Commitment”); (b) legible copies of all documents cited, raised as exceptions or noted in the Title Commitment (the “Title Documents”); and (c) Seller’s most recent ALTA Survey of the Property (or the larger parcel containing the Property) (the “Existing Survey”). Buyer may obtain, at its cost and expense, an updated survey of the Property prepared by a registered land surveyor in form acceptable to Buyer (the “Updated Survey”). The Title Commitment, the Title Documents, and the Existing Survey are collectively referred to herein as the “Title Evidence”. 4.2 Buyer’s Objections. Within thirty (30) days after receiving the last of the Title Evidence, Buyer will notify Seller of any objections to the form and/or contents of the Title Evidence (“Objections”). Any matter shown on such Title Evidence and not objected to 425 -3- 1010843.v2 by Buyer shall be a “Permitted Encumbrance” hereunder. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, in no event shall the term “Permitted Encumbrances” include mortgages, security interests, financing encumbrances, tax liens, judgment, mechanics’ liens or other monetary liens (collectively, the “Monetary Liens”), and all Monetary Liens shall be satisfied by Seller in full at or prior to the Closing Date regardless of whether objected to by Buyer. Seller will have seven (7) days after receipt of the Objections to elect in writing to cure the Objections or decline to cure the Objections. Seller’s failure to respond to the Objections in writing within such timeframe shall be deemed an election by Seller not to cure the Objections. If Seller does not agree to cure all Objections then, within five (5) days of receipt of Seller’s written notice or deemed election not to cure all Objections, Buyer may either, prior to expiration of the Due Diligence Period, (i) by written notice to Seller, elect to terminate this Agreement in which event the Earnest Money shall be refunded to Buyer and the parties shall have no further rights or obligations under this Agreement except only those which expressly survive termination, or (ii) waive said Objections and proceed to Closing at which time any waived Objections shall be “Permitted Encumbrances”. Notwithstanding any term herein apparently to the contrary, (i) if any update to the Title Evidence (including, without limitation any Updated Survey) discloses any new matter and Buyer issues Objections thereto, then Seller shall cure such Objections to Buyer’s satisfaction prior to Closing, and (ii) if Seller elects to cure any Objections and fails to complete such cure within the time agreed to by Seller (but in any event prior to the Closing Date), such failure shall be a default by Seller under this Agreement. 5.Replat of Property. It is acknowledged that the Property comprises a portion of Outlot E and is not currently a separate legal lot. Seller agrees that Buyer may proceed to apply for and pursue all requisite municipal approvals for the filing of a replat establishing the Property as a separate legal lot (the “Replat”) provided, however, that Buyer’s responsibility for attaining municipal approvals does not constitute a waiver of Buyer’s statutory or procedural requirements as a Minnesota city regarding such approvals. Buyer shall submit the preliminary Replat and all updates and revisions thereto to Seller for Seller’s review and approval prior to submitting the same, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. Seller shall cooperate with Buyer in the execution and delivery of such applications or consents as may be reasonably necessary to complete the Replat. Seller shall reimburse Buyer for all costs incurred by Buyer in connection with the Replat, including without limitation the cost of preparing and recording the Replat; provided, however, Buyer shall be responsible for all park dedication fees, trunk charges, sewer availability charges, water availability charges, surface water fees, building permits, city plan review fees and other governmental fees (other than in connection with the Replat) required for Buyer’s intended use of the Property, if any. The Replat shall include such dedicated access and utility easements, benefitting the Property and over, under and/or across Outlot E at locations mutually acceptable to Buyer and Seller, as are reasonably necessary for Buyer’s contemplated development of the Property as a community center and sports facility (the “Access and Utility Easements”). If the Access and Utility Easements are not dedicated on the Replat as contemplated above, then, provided such Access and Utility Easements are acceptable to Buyer, Seller shall grant said easements to Buyer pursuant to the Updated REOA (defined in Section 6 below). 426 -4- 1010843.v2 6.REOA. The Property is currently subject to the recorded Avienda Declaration of Reciprocal Easements and Operating Agreement dated December 29, 2022, and recorded December 29, 2022, as Document No. A756037 (the “Existing REOA”) governing that certain project owned by Seller commonly referred to as “Avienda.” Within fifteen (15) Business Days following the Effective Date, Seller will prepare either (a) a draft amendment to the Existing REOA, or (b) a new declaration of reciprocal easements and operating agreement in substitution of the Existing REOA applicable to the Property (said amendment to the Existing REOA or new declaration shall be referred to as the “Updated REOA”), governing access, parking, and utilities and establishing certain other rights and obligations between the Property and the rest of Avienda. The Updated REOA, as agreed upon by Buyer and Seller, within the commercially reasonable discretion of each, will be recorded at Closing. In the event the parties are unable to agree, in the reasonable discretion of each, upon the Updated REOA within the Due Diligence Period, either party will have the right to terminate this Agreement by written notice to the other party and the Title Company. Upon such termination, all Earnest Money will be refunded to Buyer and neither party will have any further rights or obligations regarding this Agreement, except those which expressly survive termination. 7.Contingencies. If any Contingency (as defined below) has not been satisfied on or before the expiration of the Due Diligence Period (or such other date as expressly set forth herein), then this Agreement may be terminated by written notice from Buyer to Seller; provided that with respect to any Contingency to be satisfied at Closing, Buyer shall have the right at its sole discretion to adjourn the Closing Date as necessary to allow for satisfaction of any unfulfilled Closing Contingency. Upon termination, all Earnest Money will be refunded to Buyer and neither party will have any further rights or obligations regarding this Agreement, except those which expressly survive termination. All the Contingencies are specifically for the benefit of Buyer, and Buyer has the right to waive any Contingency by written notice to Seller. The obligations of Buyer under this Agreement are contingent upon each of the following (each, a “Contingency, and collectively, the “Contingencies”): 7.1 Representations and Warranties; No defaults. The representations and warranties of Seller contained in this Agreement must be true on the Effective Date and on the Closing Date. Seller shall not be in default as of the Closing Date. 7.2 Deed. Seller shall be prepared to deliver the Deed (as defined in Section 8.1.1 below) transferring fee simple title to the Property to Buyer on the Closing Date, subject only to the Permitted Encumbrances. 7.3 Replat. At or before the Closing, Seller shall have recorded the Replat in the property records of Carver County, Minnesota or delivered the Replat into escrow with the Title Company for recording at Closing. 7.4 Updated REOA. By the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer and Seller shall have agreed upon the final form of the Updated REOA. 7.5 Due Diligence. By the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, Buyer must be satisfied in its sole discretion with the condition and all other aspects of (a) the Property 427 -5- 1010843.v2 and the results of all tests and investigations performed by it or on its behalf, and (b) the Due Diligence Materials. 7.6 Title. Title shall have been found acceptable, or been made acceptable, in accordance with the requirements and terms of Section 4. 8.Closing; Closing Documents. The closing of the purchase and sale contemplated by this Agreement (the “Closing”) shall be made through escrow deliveries to the Title Company, and shall occur on the date (the “Closing Date”) that is thirty (30) days after the expiration of the Due Diligence Period; provided, however, if Buyer delivers written notice of its waiver of the Due Diligence Period prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, then the Closing Date shall occur fifteen (15) days following the delivery of said notice. 8.1 Seller’s Closing Documents. On the Closing Date, Seller shall execute and deliver to Buyer the following (collectively, “Seller’s Closing Documents”), all in form and content reasonably satisfactory to Buyer: 8.1.1 Deed. A Limited Warranty Deed conveying good, insurable and marketable title to the Property to Buyer, free and clear of all encumbrances, except only the Permitted Encumbrances, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D (the “Deed”). 8.1.2 Replat. If not previously recorded, the final Replat for recording in the property records of Carver County, Minnesota. 8.1.3 Updated REOA. If not previously recorded, the Updated REOA for recording in the property records of Carver County, Minnesota. 8.1.4 Bringdown Certificate. A certificate certifying that Seller’s representations and warranties contained in this Agreement are true as of the Closing Date. 8.1.5 Authority Documents. A good standing certificate for Seller and resolutions from Seller, verifying that (A) Seller is properly authorized to convey the Property to Buyer in accordance with this Agreement, and (B) Seller’s business entity is currently active and in good standing in the state of its creation, and (C) Seller is authorized to conduct business in the state in which the Property is located. 8.1.6 FIRPTA. A non-foreign affidavit, properly executed, containing such information as is required by Internal Revenue Code Section 1445(b)(2) and its regulations. 8.1.7 Well Certificate. A Certificate signed by Seller warranting that there are no “Wells” on the Property within the meaning of Minn. Stat. § 103I or if there are “Wells”, a Well Certificate in the form required by law. 8.1.8 Storage Tanks. If the Property contains or contained a storage tank, an affidavit with respect thereto, as required by Minn. Stat. § 116.48. 428 -6- 1010843.v2 8.1.9 Seller’s Affidavit. A standard affidavit duly executed by Seller that on the Closing Date, there are no outstanding unsatisfied judgments, tax liens or bankruptcies against or involving Seller or the Property; that there has been no skill, labor or material furnished to the Property at the request of Seller for which payment has not been made and that there are no unrecorded interests in the Property known to Seller and including other information as may be reasonably required by the Title Company. 8.1.10 Closing Statement. A Settlement Statement prepared by Title Company consistent with the provisions of the Agreement. 8.1.11 Other Documents. All other documents reasonably necessary to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. 8.1.12 Seller’s Cash Contribution.Funds in the amount of the Seller’s Cash Contribution, in cash, by wire transfer of immediately available funds, in escrow with the Title Company, payable to Buyer. 8.2 Buyer’s Closing Documents. On the Closing Date, Buyer will execute and deliver to Seller the following (collectively, “Buyer’s Closing Documents”): 8.2.1 Purchase Price. Funds in the amount of the Purchase Price as increased or decreased by prorations or adjustments set forth in this Agreement, in cash, by wire transfer of immediately available funds, in escrow with the Title Company. 8.2.2 Updated REOA. If not previously recorded, Buyer’s counterpart to the Updated REOA. 8.2.3 Closing Statement. A Settlement Statement prepared by Title Company consistent with the provisions of the Agreement. 8.2.4 Other Documents. All other documents reasonably necessary to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. 8.3 Possession. At Closing, Seller shall deliver exclusive possession of the Property to Buyer on the Closing Date subject only to the rights of tenants under the Leases. 9.Prorations; Closing Costs. Seller and Buyer agree to the following prorations and allocations of costs: 9.1 Title Insurance and Closing Fee. Seller will pay the cost of the Title Commitment. Buyer will pay the premium for the Owner’s Policy of Title Insurance to be obtained by Buyer and any the cost of any endorsements thereto (except those which Seller agrees to obtain as part of Seller’s curative undertakings pursuant to Section 4.2). Seller and Buyer will each pay one-half of any closing fee and escrow fee or charge imposed by the Title Company. 9.2 Deed Tax. Seller shall pay all State Deed Tax payable in connection with the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. 429 -7- 1010843.v2 9.3 Recording Costs. Buyer will pay the cost of recording the Deed. Seller will pay the cost of recording all Seller’s Closing Documents (except the Deed) to the extent required to be recorded by this Agreement, including without limitation, the Replat and the Updated REOA, and any other documents necessary to place record title in the condition warranted by Seller under this Agreement. 9.4 Real Estate Taxes and Special Assessments. All real estate taxes (“Taxes”) and special assessments (“Assessments”) payable in the years prior to the year in which the Closing occurs shall be paid by Seller. All levied or pending Assessments shall be paid in full by Seller at Closing. Taxes due and payable in the year in which Closing occurs shall be prorated to the Closing Date based upon a calendar year, with Seller paying all prorated amounts applicable to the portion of such year prior to the Closing Date, and Buyer shall be responsible for prorated amounts applicable to the portion of such year on and after the Closing Date. 9.5 Attorneys’ Fees. Each of the parties hereto will pay its own attorneys’ fees (except that in the event either party brings an action to enforce this Agreement then the prevailing party shall have the right to collect from the other party the prevailing party’s attorneys’ fees incurred in enforcing this Agreement). 10.Operation Prior to Closing. From the Effective Date to the Closing Date (the “Executory Period”), Seller shall operate and maintain the Property in the ordinary course in accordance with prudent, reasonable standards. Seller shall execute no contracts, leases or other agreements regarding the Property during the Executory Period without the prior written consent of Buyer, which consent may be withheld by Buyer in its sole discretion. Seller shall promptly notify Buyer in writing of any other matters affecting the Property or title thereto, including without limitation, delivering to Buyer a copy of any notice, consent, waiver, request or other communication Seller receives with respect to any of the Property. 11.Representations and Warranties by Seller. Seller will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Buyer, its successors and assigns, from and against any and all claims, actions, damages, liability and expense, including attorneys’ fees, which may be asserted against, imposed upon, or incurred by Buyer, it successors or assigns, arising from related to, or caused by Seller’s breach of any of the below representations and warranties, whether such breach is discovered before or after the Closing, and such obligations shall survive Closing. Except as herein expressly stated, Buyer is purchasing the Property based upon its own investigation and inquiry and is not relying on any representation of Seller or other person and is agreeing to accept and purchase the Property “as is, where is” subject to the conditions of examination herein set forth and the express warranties herein contained. Seller represents and warrants to Buyer as follows: 11.1 Authority. Seller is duly organized, qualified, and in good standing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and has the requisite power and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement and each of Seller’s Closing Documents; such documents have been duly authorized by all necessary action; such documents are valid and binding obligations of Seller, and are enforceable in accordance with their terms. The individuals signing this Agreement and the Seller’s Closing Documents on behalf of Seller are authorized to sign the same on behalf of Seller and bind Seller. The execution, delivery and 430 -8- 1010843.v2 performance of this Agreement by Seller does not (i) require the consent, approval or waiver of any right by any third party which has not been obtained by Seller, or (ii) conflict with or will result in the breach of any agreement to which Seller is bound. 11.2 Noncontravention. Neither the execution nor delivery of this Agreement by Seller nor its performance will conflict with or result in a violation or breach of any law, regulation, order, writ, or injunction of any court or governmental agency applicable to Seller or to the Property, or of any term, condition, or any indenture or other contract or agreement to which Seller is a party, or cause a default thereunder, or result in the creation or imposition of any lien, charge, or encumbrance of any nature whatsoever on the Property pursuant to the terms of any such agreement. 11.3 Contracts. There are no contracts (including, but not limited to, maintenance, repair, operation, use, management, license, franchise, service, use, occupancy, provider, equipment, maintenance or other contracts) which shall be binding upon Buyer or bind or affect any part of the Property after the Closing. 11.4 Due Diligence Materials. To the best of Seller’s actual knowledge, the copies of the Due Diligence Materials provided to Buyer are true, correct and complete in all material respects and Seller has no knowledge that any information contained therein is inaccurate. 11.5 Operations. Seller has received no notice of actual or threatened special assessments or reassessments of the Property. The Property is in compliance with all applicable codes, ordinances, zoning and governmental permits and requirements, and all necessary permits have been obtained and are in full force and effect and no default exists thereunder. 11.6 Environmental Laws. To the best of Seller’s knowledge, the Property is in compliance with all applicable Environmental Laws (as defined below), and no toxic or hazardous substances or wastes, pollutants or contaminants (including, without limitation, asbestos, urea formaldehyde, the group of organic compounds known as polychlorinated biphenyls, toxic mold, petroleum products including gasoline, fuel oil, crude oil and various constituents of such products, and any hazardous substance as defined in any Environmental Law (collectively, “Hazardous Substances”) have been generated, treated, stored, transferred from, released or disposed of, or otherwise placed, deposited in or located on the Property in violation of any Environmental Law or in a manner that would require remediation, removal or response actions under any Environmental Law, nor has any activity been undertaken on the Property that would cause or contribute to the Property becoming a treatment, storage or disposal facility within the meaning of any Environmental Law. The term “Environmental Law” shall mean any and all federal, state and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, regulations, rules, policies, consent decrees, judicial orders, administrative orders or other requirements relating to the environment or to human health or safety associated with the environment, all as amended or modified from time to time. To the best of Seller’s knowledge, there has been no discharge, release or threatened release of Hazardous Substances from the Property, and there are no Hazardous Substances or conditions in or on the Property that may support a claim or cause of action under any Environmental Law. 431 -9- 1010843.v2 11.7 FIRPTA. Seller is not a “foreign person”, “foreign partnership”, “foreign trust” or “foreign estate”, as those terms are defined in Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code. 11.8 Proceedings. There is no action, litigation, investigation, condemnation or proceeding of any kind pending or, to the best knowledge of Seller, threatened against Seller or any portion of the Property. There are no pending tax appeals with respect to the Property. 11.9 Wells. Seller certifies and warrants that the Seller does not know of any “Wells” on the described Property within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes § 103I. This representation is intended to satisfy the requirements of that Statute. 11.10 Methamphetamine. To the best knowledge of Seller, no methamphetamine production has occurred on the Property. This representation is intended to satisfy the requirements of Minnesota Statutes § 152.0275 Subd. 2(m). 11.11 Storage Tanks. To the best knowledge of Seller after due inquiry, no aboveground or underground tanks are located in or about the Property, or have been located under, in or about the Property or have subsequently been removed or filled. 11.12 Sewage Treatment System Disclosure. For the purposes of satisfying any applicable requirements of Minn. Stat. § 115.55, Seller discloses and certifies that: a)No sewage is generated on the Property; and b)Seller has no knowledge of the existence of a “subsurface sewage treatment system” (as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 115.55, Subd. 1(h)) on the Property. 11.13 Solvency. Seller has not (i) made a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, (ii) filed any voluntary petition in bankruptcy or suffered the filing of any involuntary petition by Seller’s creditors, (iii) suffered the appointment of a receiver to take possession of all, or substantially all, of Seller’s assets, (iv) suffered the attachment or other judicial seizure of all, or substantially all, of Seller’s assets, (v) admitted in writing its inability to pay its debts as they come due, or (vi) made an offer of settlement, extension or composition to its creditors generally. 12.Casualty; Condemnation. If all or any part of the Property is materially damaged by fire, casualty, the elements or any other cause before the Closing, Seller shall immediately give notice to Buyer, and Buyer shall have the right to terminate this Agreement and receive back the Earnest Money by giving Seller written notice thereof within thirty (30) days after Buyer’s receipt of Seller’s notice, and Closing shall be adjourned at Buyer’s option as necessary for Buyer to make its election. If Buyer shall fail to give notice of termination within such thirty-day period, then the parties hereto shall proceed to Closing, and Seller shall assign to Buyer all rights to insurance proceeds resulting from such event. If the Property is not materially damaged prior to Closing, Seller shall restore the Property before Closing to a condition reasonably similar to that which existed prior to such damage. If eminent domain proceedings are threatened or commenced against all or any part of the Property, Seller shall immediately give notice to Buyer, and Buyer 432 -10- 1010843.v2 shall have the right to terminate this Agreement and receive back the Earnest Money by giving Seller written notice thereof within thirty (30) days after Buyer’s receipt of Seller’s notice, and Closing shall be adjourned at Buyer’s option as necessary for Buyer to make its election. If Buyer shall fail to give notice of termination within such thirty-day period, then the parties hereto shall proceed to Closing, and Seller shall assign to Buyer all rights to appear in and receive any award from such proceedings. In the event any awards are made prior to Closing, Seller shall place such awards in escrow with the Title Company, which will release such awards to Buyer upon Closing or to Seller upon termination of this Agreement. 13.Broker. Seller and Buyer represent and warrant to each other that they have dealt with no brokers, finders or the like in connection with this transaction. Each of Buyer and Seller agree to indemnify and hold the other harmless from all claims, damages, costs or expenses of or for any other such fees or commissions resulting from their actions or agreements regarding the execution or performance of this Agreement, and will pay all costs of defending any action or lawsuit brought to recover any such fees or commissions incurred by the other party, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. 14.Notices. All notices and notifications required or permitted under this Agreement to be sent from one party to the other must be in writing and personally delivered, sent by (a) a nationally recognized private carrier of overnight mail (e.g., Federal Express), (b) United States certified mail, return receipt requested and postage prepaid or (c) email, provided that a copy of such notice is also sent via overnight delivery service within two (2) Business Days of the transmission. All notices shall be delivered to the applicable addresses as set forth below, or at such other addresses as the parties may designate by written notice from time to time given at least five (5) days in advance of the effective date of such change. If to Buyer:City of Chanhassen, Minnesota 7700 Market Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attn: Laurie Hokkanen Email: lhokkanen@chanhassenmn.gov With a copy to:Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Attn: Jay Lindgren and Will Elliott Email: Lindgren.jay@dorsey.com Elliott.will@dorsey.com If to Seller:Level 7 Development, LLC 4600 Kings Point Road Minnetrista MN 55331 Attn: Mercedes Rhoads Email: ariusrealestatedevelopment@gmail.com With a copy to:Mark Nordland 200 Southdale Center 433 -11- 1010843.v2 Edina, MN 55435 Email: mnordland@nordlandpartners.com And with a copy to:Larry M. Wertheim Kennedy & Graven, Chtd. 700 5th Street Towers 150 So. 5th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Email: lwertheim@kennedy-graven.com 15.Remedies. 15.1 If Buyer defaults under this Agreement, and fails to cure such default within ten (10) days of Seller’s written notice of default, then Seller shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, and upon such termination Seller will retain the Earnest Money as liquidated damages, time being of the essence of this Agreement, and upon such termination neither party shall have any further rights or obligations under this Agreement except only those which expressly survive termination. Seller’s termination of this Agreement and retention of the Earnest Money is Seller’s sole and exclusive remedy in the event of a Buyer default under this Agreement. 15.2 If Seller defaults under this Agreement, and fails to cure such default within ten (10) days of Buyer’s written notice of default (provided that Seller shall have no such cure period if Seller’s default is due to Seller’s failure to close on the Closing Date), then Buyer shall have the right to either (i) terminate this Agreement, recover the Earnest Money, and receive reimbursement from Seller of Buyer’s damages and out of pocket expenses incurred in connection with this transaction, and upon such termination neither party shall have any further rights or obligations under this Agreement except only those which expressly survive termination; or (ii) seek specific performance of this Agreement by commencing suit therefor within three (3) months after the date of Buyer’s notice to Seller of default; provided, however that if the remedy of specific performance is unavailable, Buyer shall have all remedies at law and in equity. 16.Confidentiality; Exclusivity. Buyer and Seller agree that the terms of this Agreement, as well as the identity of the parties to the transactions contemplated hereby, and all information concerning the Property will be kept in confidence by Buyer and Seller prior to the Closing, and thereafter, if the Closing fails to occur for any reason, except as maybe required under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13). After the occurrence of the Closing, Buyer and Seller may disclose that the transactions contemplated hereby have occurred and that the Property has been sold, but will not disclose the Purchase Price, except to actual or prospective lenders, investors, shareholders, analysts, consultants and governmental agencies. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing contained herein will be construed so as to prohibit Seller or Buyer from making (a) a disclosure to officers, employees and those agents, contractors or vendors or potential assignees that need to know in order to assist Buyer or Seller in the transaction contemplated by this Agreement, (b) any disclosure required by law, including 434 -12- 1010843.v2 any such disclosure required by any federal, state or local governmental agency or court of competent jurisdiction, or (c) any disclosure which is reasonably necessary to protect any such party’s interest in any action, suit or proceeding brought by or against such party and relating to the Property or the subject matter of this Agreement. Neither Seller nor its agents shall directly or indirectly market the Property for sale or make, accept, negotiate or otherwise pursue any other offers for the sale of the Property or any interest in the Property while this Agreement remains in effect. The terms and conditions of this Section 16 shall survive Closing. 17.Miscellaneous. The paragraph headings or captions appearing in this Agreement are for convenience only, are not a part of this Agreement, and are not to be considered in interpreting this Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete agreement between the parties hereto and supersedes any prior oral or written agreements between the parties regarding the Property. There are no verbal agreements that change this Agreement, and no waiver, amendment or modification of any of its terms will be effective unless in a writing executed by both of the parties hereto. This Agreement binds and benefits the parties hereto and their successors and permitted assigns. This Agreement has been made under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and such laws will control its interpretation. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of which are considered one and the same Agreement notwithstanding that all parties hereto have not signed the same counterpart. Signatures of this Agreement which are transmitted electronically, including by facsimile, DocuSign or PDF attachment to electronic mail, are valid for all purposes. Any references in this Agreement to time for performance of obligations or elapsed time shall mean consecutive calendar days, months, or years, as applicable, unless otherwise explicitly indicated herein. In the event that the day on which Buyer or Seller is required to take any action under the terms of this Agreement is not a Business Day, such action shall be taken on the next succeeding Business Day. For purposes of this Agreement the term “Business Day” shall mean all calendar days except for Saturdays, Sundaysand nationally observed holidays. [The balance of this page has been left blank intentionally.] 435 -17- 1010843.v2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller and Buyer have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. BUYER: CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota municipal corporation By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: SELLER: LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company By: Name: Bahram Akradi Title: President 436 A-1 1010843.v2 EXHIBIT A-1 Depiction of Property 437 A-2 1010843.v2 EXHIBIT A-2 Depiction of Outlot E 438 B-1 1010843.v2 EXHIBIT B Escrow Agreement ESCROW AGREEMENT Level 7 Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Seller”), and the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Buyer”), have entered into that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement dated , 2025 (the “Purchase Agreement”) to which Purchase Agreement this Escrow Agreement is attached as an Exhibit. The parties have requested First American Title Insurance Company (“Escrow Agent”) to hold an initial earnest money deposit of $70,000.00 (such amount together with interest earned thereon, the “Earnest Money”), in escrow and to disburse or apply such Earnest Money at the Closing in accordance with the Purchase Agreement. Escrow Agent agrees to hold the Earnest Money in accordance with the terms of the Purchase Agreement and disburse the same strictly in accordance with such terms. Escrow Agent shall invest the Earnest Money in such interest-bearing accounts or instruments at the direction of Buyer. Interest shall be considered a part of the Earnest Money for all purposes under the Purchase Agreement and this Escrow Agreement. Escrow Agent shall have no responsibility for any decision concerning performance or effectiveness of the Purchase Agreement or to resolve any disputes concerning the Purchase Agreement. Escrow Agent shall be responsible only to act in accordance with the Purchase Agreement or the joint and mutual direction of both Seller and Buyer, or in lieu thereof, the direction of a court of competent jurisdiction. Seller and Buyer undertake to hold Escrow Agent harmless from all claims for damages arising out of this Escrow Agreement and do hereby agree to indemnify Escrow Agent for all costs and expenses in connection with this escrow, including court costs and attorneys’ fees, except for Escrow Agent’s failure to account for the funds held hereunder, or acting in conflict with the terms hereof. [Remainder of this page intentionally left blank] 439 B-2 1010843.v2 NOW THEREFORE, Escrow Agent, Seller and Buyer have executed this Escrow Agreement concerning the Earnest Money. ESCROW AGENT: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By:_______________________________________ Name:_____________________________________ Title:______________________________________ SELLER: Level 7 Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company By: ______________________________________ Name: Bahram Akradi Title: President BUYER: City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation By:_______________________________________ Name:_____________________________________ Title:______________________________________ By:_______________________________________ Name:_____________________________________ Title:______________________________________ 440 C-1 1010843.v2 EXHIBIT C Due Diligence Materials 1.A copy of the existing REOA; 2.A copy of the Existing Survey and owner’s or lender’s policy of title insurance; 3.All originals and copies of the as-built blueprints, drawings, site plans, engineering and architectural plans and specifications, as-built plans and specifications, land use and zoning materials for the Property; 4.Copies of all service and maintenance contracts, equipment leases and other contracts that relate to the Property; 5.Copies of all permits, licenses, and trade names; all warranties and guaranties relating to the Property; and all business records, including management, leasing, real estate taxes, assessments, insurance, rents, maintenance, repairs, capital improvements and services; 6.Copies of all environmental reports (including any existing Phase I or Phase II reports, inspection reports, audits, compliance documentation, permits, closure letters, no-action letters, no-association letters, and other environmental documents and records) pertaining to the Property or any activities or operations at any time on the Property and copies of all records concerning the presence, location and quantity of mold, fungal growth or Hazardous Substances, asbestos-containing materials and presumed asbestos-containing materials at or affecting the Property; 7.All utility bills for the prior six (6) months; 8.Real estate tax bills for the prior three (3) years; and 9.Copies of any notices of violations of any federal, state, municipal or other health, fire, building, zoning, safety, environmental protection or other applicable codes, laws, rules, regulations or ordinances related or applying to the Property. 441 D-1 1010843.v2 EXHIBIT D Form of Deed (Top 3 inches reserved for recording data) LIMITED WARRANTY DEED STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $Dated: ________ __, 2025 eCRV No. FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Level 7 Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Grantor”), hereby conveys and quitclaims to the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Grantee”), real estate in Carver County, Minnesota, described on Exhibit A attached hereto, together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto. This Limited Warranty Deed conveys after-acquired title. Grantor warrants that Grantor has not done or suffered anything to encumber the property, EXCEPT only as set forth on Exhibit B attached hereto (the “Permitted Encumbrances”). ____ Grantor certifies that Grantor does not know of any wells on the described real estate. ____ A well disclosure certificate accompanies this Deed. ____ Grantor is familiar with the real estate described in this instrument and Grantor certifies that the status and number of wells on the described real estate have not changed since the last previously filed well disclosure certificate. ____ Check here if part or all of the real estate is registered (Torrens) (Signature follows on next page) 442 D-2 1010843.v2 GRANTOR: LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company By: _____________________________ Name: Bahram Akradi Title: President STATE OF _________________) ) ss. COUNTY OF ________________ ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________, 2025, by Bahram Akradi as President of LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of said limited liability company. (Stamp) (Signature of notarial officer) Title (and Rank): My commission expires: (month/day/year) THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP (WE) 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Tax Statements for the real estate described in this instrument should be sent to and after recording return to: 443 1010843.v2 EXHIBIT A Legal Description to Limited Warranty Deed 444 1010843.v2 EXHIBIT B Permitted Encumbrances to Limited Warranty Deed 445 998927.v2 4911-3155-1752\6 February 18, 2025 Level 7 Development, LLC Attention Bahram Akradi, President RE: Letter of Intent for Proposed Purchase and Sale of the real property consisting of a portion of Outlot E, Avienda Townhomes, Carver County, Minnesota, located in Chanhassen, MN Dear Mr. Akradi, This letter of intent outlines the general terms and conditions upon which the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota (“Buyer”) desires to negotiate with Level 7 Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Seller”), for the purchase and sale of that certain real property described in Paragraph 1 below Property”). Except for the items set forth in Section B below, (a) this letter does not constitute a binding agreement or contract; and (b) neither Buyer nor Seller will be bound to purchase and sell the Property unless both Buyer and Seller execute a binding purchase and sale contract for the Property (“Purchase Agreement”). The purpose of this letter is to summarize discussions concerning the purchase and sale as well as the development of the Property and to set forth a basis upon which the parties, together with their respective attorneys, may proceed to draft and negotiate toward the execution of a definitive and binding Purchase Agreement. It is understood that either party may terminate negotiation of the Purchase Agreement at any time and for any reason (or no reason). A. Based on the foregoing understanding, the parties desire to negotiate a Purchase Agreement with the following terms and conditions: 1. The Property The Property consists of a portion of Outlot E, Avienda Townhome, Carver County, Minnesota, and is approximately depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and is comprised, collectively, of the 10.01 acres crosshatched in blue and the adjacent 3 acres crosshatched in red. 2. Purchase Price The Purchase Price for the Property will be $1,000,000 per gross acre, in cash at Closing. The Property is approximately 13 acres (Outlot E is approximately 22.79 acres), but the final acreage of the Property shall be determined by the Replat (as defined below) prior to Closing, and the Purchase Price shall be set in accordance with the actual acreage. 3. Seller Contribution Notwithstanding the Purchase Price set forth above, Seller wishes to provide a contribution to Buyer to assist with the cost of acquiring the Property and for design and construction of the corresponding project to be constructed by Buyer on the Property, which such contribution shall be in the form of a $300,000 per acre tax-deductible gift applied at Closing. Seller and Buyer shall enter into a separate Gift Agreement simultaneously Docusign Envelope ID: B1DC11BD-8E33-4D60-9BF5-59B50B594D4B 446 998927.v2 4911-3155-1752\6 with the Purchase Agreement setting forth the terms and conditions of the gift. 4. Earnest Money Buyer will place $70,000 (“Earnest Money”) into an interest bearing escrow account to be held by First American Title Insurance Company, 121 South Eighth Street, Suite 1250, Minneapolis MN 55402 (“Title Company”), as escrowee, within three (3) business days following execution of the Purchase Agreement. The Earnest Money, plus any interest earned, will be applied to the Purchase Price at Closing. 5. Seller Documents Within ten (10) business days following the execution of the Purchase Agreement, Seller will deliver to Buyer the documents set forth on Exhibit B. 6. Due Diligence Period Buyer will have a ninety (90) day due diligence period from the date the Purchase Agreement is fully executed the “Due Diligence Period”) to review all matters pertaining to the Property, including, without limitation, the conditions of an environmental audit, and availability of financing. Seller will cooperate with Buyer and its representatives during this Inspection Period and permit such access to the Property as Buyer reasonably requests. The Purchase Agreement shall terminate, and the Earnest Money will be refunded to Buyer in the event Buyer gives written notice to Seller that the results of Buyer's examinations and investigations undertaken during the Inspection Period are unsatisfactory to Buyer in Buyer's sole discretion, provided that such written notice is received by Seller on or before the expiration of the Due Diligence Period. 7. Title and Survey No later than ten (10) business days after the date of the Purchase Agreement, Seller will provide Buyer with any existing ALTA survey of the Property and a title commitment for the Property issued by the Title Company the “Title Commitment”), together with copies of all recorded documents evidencing the exceptions to title that are described in Schedule B of the Title Commitment. Buyer may obtain at Closing at Buyer’s cost an ALTA Owner’s Title Insurance Policy issued by the Title Company, together with such endorsements desired by Buyer. Upon Buyer’s written request, within forty-five 45) days after receipt of the Title Commitment, Seller shall provide to Buyer an updated ALTA survey of the Property (the "Updated Survey"). Buyer shall have ten 10) business days following receipt of the Title Commitment and the Updated Survey (or existing survey, if no Updated Survey is ordered) to raise any objections to the condition of title of the Property. Except for Docusign Envelope ID: B1DC11BD-8E33-4D60-9BF5-59B50B594D4B 447 998927.v2 4911-3155-1752\6 monetary liens, all matters identified in the Title Commitment and the Updated Survey which are not objected to by Buyer during such period shall be deemed approved. 8. REOA The Property is currently subject to the recorded Avienda Declaration of Reciprocal Easements and Operating Agreement (the “Existing REOA”). Following execution of the Purchase Agreement, the parties shall either negotiate a new reciprocal easements and operating agreement (the “New REOA”) between the Property and the remainder of Avienda or an amendment to the Existing REOA addressing the Property in a form acceptable to Buyer. It shall be a condition of Buyer’s obligation to close under the Agreement that either (a) Seller shall release the Property from the Existing REOA, and Seller and Buyer shall have entered into the New REOA or (b) Seller shall have amended the Existing REOA in a form acceptable to Buyer. 9. Replat The parties understand and acknowledge that Outlot E must be replatted prior to Closing approximately as depicted on Exhibit A (the “Replat”). Seller shall, at its expense, coordinate the Replat of Outlot E, and Buyer shall reasonably cooperate with the Replat process to the extent required and at no out-of-pocket cost to Buyer, except that Buyer shall be responsible for all park dedication fees, all trunk charges, all sewer availability charges, all water availability charges, surface water fee, building permits, city plan review fee, building permits, and other governmental fees for Buyer’s intended use of the Property, if any. The Replat and all other governmental approvals and permits for the Property shall be consistent with the Seller’s planned development of the remainder of Avienda, which shall include, without limitation, the obligation of Buyer to provide sufficient parking on the Property for Buyer’s intended use. Buyer shall have the right to review and approve the Replat as it pertains to the Property, and Seller shall not seek final governmental approval of the Replat prior to receipt of Buyer’s written approval. Buyer’s obligation to close will be conditioned upon approval of such Replat by all applicable governmental authorities and the recording of the applicable Replat documents at, or prior to, Closing. 10. Closing The purchase of the Property will close (“Closing”) the earlier of (i) thirty (30) days following the expiration of the Due Diligence Period and (ii) fifteen (15) days following Buyer’s notice to Seller of Buyer’s written waiver of the Due Diligence Period. If Buyer fails to close on the purchase of the Property in accordance with Docusign Envelope ID: B1DC11BD-8E33-4D60-9BF5-59B50B594D4B 448 998927.v2 4911-3155-1752\6 the terms of the Purchase Agreement, Seller shall be entitled to retain the Earnest Money, and all interest earned thereon, as liquidated damages and as its sole and exclusive remedy. 11. Property Condition Buyer agrees that it will be purchasing the Property “As- Is” and “with all faults,” with no warranty by Seller of any kind, expressed or implied, except as provided in the Purchase Agreement. 12. Representations and Warranties Buyer and Seller shall provide customary representations, warranties, and covenants to each other regarding their respective entity status, authority to perform under the Purchase Agreement, conditions of the Property and maintenance of the Property between execution of the Purchase Agreement and Closing, and other matters, as may be agreed by Buyer and Seller. 13. Broker Commission Buyer and Seller each represent that no real estate broker was in any way involved in this transaction. Seller will indemnify Buyer against any losses, claims, damages, costs, expenses and liability, which Buyer may incur which arise from any entity claiming a brokerage commission in connection alleged representation of Seller in this transaction. Buyer will indemnify Seller against any losses, claims, damages, costs, expenses and liability, which Seller may incur which arise from any entity claiming a brokerage commission in connection alleged representation of Buyer in this transaction. 14. Closing Costs Seller shall pay the following Closing Costs: (i) the cost of the Title Commitment, (ii) Seller’s legal fees, (iii) one- half (1/2) of the Title Company’s closing fee, if any, and iv) all transfer tax imposed by the State in connection with the sale. Buyer shall pay the following Closing Costs: (i) Buyer’s legal fees, (ii) the premium for the Title Policy and the cost of all endorsements to the Title Policy, (iii) one-half 1/2) of the Title Company’s closing fee, if any, (iv) the cost to record the Special Warranty Deed conveying title to the Property to Buyer at Closing. B. The following terms of this letter of intent are binding on Buyer and Seller: 1. Exclusive Negotiating Period Seller agrees that for the period commencing upon the mutual execution of this letter of intent and continuing until the earlier to occur of (i) the mutual execution and delivery of the Purchase Agreement and (ii) sixty (60) days thereafter, and for as long thereafter as the Purchase Docusign Envelope ID: B1DC11BD-8E33-4D60-9BF5-59B50B594D4B 449 998927.v2 4911-3155-1752\6 Agreement remains in effect, (1) Seller will neither (a) promote the sale of the Property to, or solicit offers to purchase the Property from, other parties, nor (b) discuss or negotiate with other parties regarding any unsolicited offers received from such other parties, and (2) Buyer will not discuss or negotiate with other partis regarding a sports facility/community center to be owned or leased to the Buyer on any land other than the Property. 2. Non-Disclosure & Confidentiality Buyer and Seller agree that the terms described herein, and the existence of the letter of intent are highly confidential. Accordingly, Buyer and Seller will keep confidential all such terms and the fact of the existence of this letter of intent, except as required under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13). Notwithstanding the foregoing, Buyer and Seller have the right to disclose the monetary terms of this letter (i) to their respective advisors and consultants and potential equity partners and lenders, provided such advisors, consultants, partners and lenders agree to maintain confidentiality as provided above, and/or (ii) unless compelled by a court or governmental authority to do so. Buyer and Seller further agree that no information concerning this transaction will be conveyed, shared, discussed, released, published or made public in any way, with any person or organization of any kind without the prior written consent of both Buyer and Seller. Buyer and Seller will endeavor to negotiate and execute a Purchase Agreement within sixty (60) days after signing this letter of intent. If you desire to proceed to negotiate a Purchase Agreement based upon the foregoing understandings, please sign this letter in the place provided below and return it to Buyer. Upon receipt of the signed electronic copy of this letter from Seller, Buyer’s counsel will prepare an initial draft of the Purchase Agreement. Signature Page Follows] Docusign Envelope ID: B1DC11BD-8E33-4D60-9BF5-59B50B594D4B 450 4911-3155-1752\6 BUYER: The City of Chanhassen, Minnesota By: Name: Elise Ryan Title: Mayor_______________________________ Date: _______________________________ By: Name: Laurie Hokkanen Title: City Manager Date: _______________________________ ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO: SELLER: Level 7 Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company By: Name: Bahram Akradi___________________________ Title: President Date: Docusign Envelope ID: B1DC11BD-8E33-4D60-9BF5-59B50B594D4B 2/18/2025 2/19/2025 2/19/2025 451 4911-3155-1752\6 EXHIBIT A Depiction of the Property Docusign Envelope ID: B1DC11BD-8E33-4D60-9BF5-59B50B594D4B 452 4911-3155-1752\6 EXHIBIT B Seller Documents A. Seller’s existing title insurance policy, including all exception documents (including the REOA) and the most recent survey of the Property; B. Any preliminary plats, final plats, plans, permits, applications, drawings, or specification related to the development or proposed development of the Property. C. Copies of all leases (including any agricultural or residential leases), contracts, service contracts, warranties, reports or other agreements that affect the Property and other materials related to Seller’s ownership or operation of the Property; D. All geological studies and reports, soil reports, grading plans, environmental studies and reports Phase 1 and Phase 2), property insurance policies and claims history, contracts with consultants and contractors that have provided labor or services related to the Property, and other documents and reports regarding the physical condition of the Property; and E. All other documents in Seller’s possession or control and related to the Property. Docusign Envelope ID: B1DC11BD-8E33-4D60-9BF5-59B50B594D4B 453 4923-4016-6664\3 GIFT AGREEMENT This GIFT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is entered into effective as of February 18, 2025, by and between Level 7 Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Level 7”) and City of Chanhassen, Minnesota (the “City”) (each a “Party” and collectively, the “Parties”). RECITALS A. Level 7 and the City are parties to that certain [Purchase and Sale Agreement], dated as of the date hereof (the “Purchase Agreement”), for the purchase and sale of certain real property located in Chanhassen, Minnesota, as further described in the Purchase Agreement (the “Property”). B. The City intends to acquire the Property for the purpose of developing that certain project known as the “Chanhassen Bluffs Community Center” (the “Project”). C. Level 7 desires to contribute to the development of the Project by granting a gift to the City. Said gift shall be given in the form of a purchase price credit applied towards the purchase price payable by the City pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein and other valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, each Party hereby agrees as follows: 1. Gift. Level 7 hereby pledges to make a gift to the City in the form of a tax-deductible purchase price credit applied towards the purchase price payable by the City pursuant to the Purchase Agreement (the “Gift”). The value of the Gift shall be $300,000 per acre of the Property. The Property is estimated to be approximately 13 acres, but the final acreage of the Property shall be determined in accordance with the Purchase Agreement, and, accordingly, the final amount of the Gift shall be set in accordance with the actual acreage of the Property. The Parties acknowledge receipt of valuable consideration from this Agreement resulting from the City’s intended public use of the Property and the benefits the Project creates for the remainder of the Avienda project. 2. Execution in Counterparts and Electronic Signatures. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, which when so executed shall constitute one and the same agreement or direction. Copies (whether facsimile, electronically reproduced, photostatic or otherwise) of signatures to this Agreement shall be deemed to be originals and may be relied on to the same extent as the originals. 3. Governing Law; Consent to Jurisdiction and Venue. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Minnesota without giving effect to the conflict of laws principles thereof. In the event that any party hereto commences a lawsuit or other proceeding relating to or arising from this Agreement, the Parties agree that the Minnesota State Courts, District Court of Carver County, Minnesota , shall have the sole and exclusive jurisdiction over any such proceeding. The parties acknowledge and agree that the District Court of Carver County shall be the proper venue for any such lawsuit or judicial proceeding and the Parties waive any objection to such venue. Signature Page Follows] Docusign Envelope ID: B1DC11BD-8E33-4D60-9BF5-59B50B594D4B 454 2 4923-4016-6664\3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date first above written. CITY: The City of Chanhassen, Minnesota By: Name: Elise Ryan Title: Mayor ___________________________ By: Name: Laurie Hokkanen Title: City Manager LEVEL 7: Level 7 Development LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company By: Name: Bahram Akradi__________________________ Title: President SIGNATURE PAGE TO GIFT AGREEMENT] Docusign Envelope ID: B1DC11BD-8E33-4D60-9BF5-59B50B594D4B 455 City Council Item May 5, 2025 Item Report on City Manager's Performance Review File No.Item No: I.1 Agenda Section COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION Mayor Ryan will give verbal report from the annual performance review that was held in closed session on March 24, 2025. Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 456 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT_Pleasant View Rd_Kimley-Horn PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 28th day of April, 2025, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ("Consultant"). IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The City retains Consultant for preliminary design services for the Pleasant View Road Improvement Project. 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents," all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Professional Services Agreement; B. Insurance Certificate; C. Consultant’s Proposal dated April 11, 2025 (“Proposal”). In the event of conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts, with Contract Document “A” having the first priority and Contract Document “C” having the last priority. 3. COMPENSATION. Consultant shall be paid by the City for the services described in the Proposal a not to exceed fee of One Hundred Sixty-Nine Thousand Six Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars ($169,625.00), inclusive of expenses. Services performed by Consultant shall be paid at an hourly rate in accordance with the Proposal, subject to the not to exceed fee. The not to exceed fees and expenses shall not be adjusted if the estimated hours to perform a task, the number of required meetings, or any other estimate or assumption is exceeded. Consultant shall bill the City as the work progresses. Payment shall be made by the City within thirty-five (35) days of receipt of an invoice. 4. DOCUMENT OWNERSHIP. All reports, plans, models, diagrams, analyses, and information generated in connection with performance of this Agreement shall be the property of the City. The City may use the information for its purposes. Any modifications made by the City to any of the Consultant’s documents, or any use, partial use or reuse of the documents without written authorization or adaptation by the Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk and without liability to the Consultant, and the City shall indemnify, defend and hold the Consultant harmless from all claims, damages, losses and expenses, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees, resulting therefrom. 103457 2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT_Pleasant View Rd_Kimley-Horn 5. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders, regardless of amount, must be approved in advance and in writing by the City. No payment will be due or made for work done in advance of such approval. 6. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services hereunder, Consultant shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provisions of services to be provided. 7. STANDARD OF CARE. Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a professional consultant under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement. City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of Consultant’s services. 8. INDEMNIFICATION. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, and employees, from claims, demands, actions, causes of action, including costs and reasonable attorney's fees, to the extent caused by the negligent performance of the services provided for herein. The Consultant shall not be held liable for the sole negligence of the City. 9. INSURANCE. Consultant shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect Consultant from claims under the Worker’s Compensation Acts, automobile liability, and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than: Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate Automobile Liability $2,000,000 combined single limit Professional Liability $2,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate The City shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability policy on a primary and non- contributory basis. Before commencing work, the Consultant shall provide the City a certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverage in a form acceptable to City. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains Consultant as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Consultant shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Consultant shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Consultant’s performance under this Agreement. City and Consultant agree that Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Consultant shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Consultant’s own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 104458 3 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT_Pleasant View Rd_Kimley-Horn 11. SUBCONTRACTORS. Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. Consultant shall comply with Minnesota Statutes § 471.425. Consultant must pay subcontractors for all undisputed services provided by subcontractors within ten (10) days of Consultant’s receipt of payment from City. Consultant must pay interest of one and five-tenths percent (1.5%) per month or any part of a month to subcontractors on any undisputed amount not paid on time to subcontractors. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) or more is Ten Dollars ($10.00). 12. CONTROLLING LAW/VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Carver County Minnesota. 13. MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Consultant must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event Consultant receives a request to release data, Consultant must immediately notify City. City will give Consultant instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Consultant’s officers’, agents’, city’s, partners’, employees’, volunteers’, assignees’ or subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 14. COPYRIGHT. Consultant shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or software license by reason of the use or adoption of any software, designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting therefrom. 15. PATENTED DEVICES, MATERIALS AND PROCESSES. If the Contract requires, or the Consultant desires, the use of any design, devise, material or process covered by letters, patent or copyright, trademark or trade name, the Consultant shall provide for such use by suitable legal agreement with the patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the City. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of any such patented designed, device, material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in connection with the services agreed to be performed under the Contract, and shall indemnify and defend the City for any costs, liability, expenses and attorney's fees that result from any such infringement. 105459 4 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT_Pleasant View Rd_Kimley-Horn 16. RECORDS. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records of hours worked and expenses involved in the performance of services. 17. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, or any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 18. WAIVER. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 20. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by the City for any reason or for convenience upon written notice to the Consultant. In the event of termination, the City shall be obligated to the Consultant for payment of amounts due and owing including payment for services performed or furnished to the date and time of termination. The Consultant shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon seven days’ notice to the City upon breach by City of any of its obligations under this Agreement. Dated: _______________, 2025. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: _____________________________________________ Elise Ryan, Mayor BY: _____________________________________________ Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Dated: _______________, 2025. KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. BY: _____________________________________________ ____________ Its: __________________ Daniel J. Coyle Vice President April 23 106460