Loading...
CAS-39_HALLA GREENS - 495 PIONEER TRAIL FILE 2 OF 2CITY OF CMN>IA3SEN T700 Market Boulevard PO Boz 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952 227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.11 BO Fax: 952.227.1199 Engineering Phone. 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.114g Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1 120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning $ Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227,1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site Www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner DATE: March 13, 2006 0yp SUBJ: Halla Greens - Site Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit Amendment with Variances for the construction of a golf course. Planning Case 05-39 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Site Plan and a Conditional Use Permit Amendment with Variances for the following: The City of Chan hassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A geat place to live, work, and play. WAS PROPOSED Club House 40' x 60' 40'x 66' Outdoor 10' x 60' covered porch 13'4" x 40' screened veranda on seating areas without screening and a 1,413 each end of the building and a sq ft patio 1,000 sq ft patio Maintenance 30' x 60' 68' x 120' with a 24' future building addition Ball washing None Proposed 32' x 24' Ball washing building building Shelter None Proposed 16' x 40' teaching shelter building building. The use was originally approved without a shelter building and as an auxiliary use to the golf course. Lighting Lights attached to the building Parking lot lights Temporary None Proposed Request for a temporary 12' structure octagon building to serve as customer and employee building. Building Wood was used as an exterior Ribbed metal is proposed as the Material material for the utility building exterior material for the (variance maintenance building and ball required) washing building (ribbed metal is not permitted as an exterior finish on a building) Hours of Sunrise to Sunset Request for an amendment to Operation allow 6:00a.m. to I1:00p.m. The conditional use permit criteria limits the hours of operation and maintenance of a golf course from sunrise to sunset. The City of Chan hassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A geat place to live, work, and play. Mr. Todd Gerhardt Halla Greens Planning Case No. 05-39 March 13, 2006 Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED City Council approval requires a majority of City Council present. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 7, 2006 to review the proposed development. The Planning Commission voted 4 to 2 to deny the requested amendments. The summary and verbatim minutes are attached to the staff report. Staff is recommending approval with conditions of some of the requests and denial of the others. The requests and the recommendations are as follows (detailed motions are available on pages 18 through 20 of the staff report): PROPOSED Recommendation Club House 40'x 66' Approval Outdoor seating areas 13'4" x 40' screened veranda on each Approval end of the building and a 1,000 sq ft patio Maintenance building 68' x 120' with a 24' future addition Denial -Maintain the size of the 1,800 square -foot previously approved building Ball washing bldg. 32' x 24' Ball washing building Denial -Combine with the Maintenance building Shelter building 16' x 40' teaching shelter building. Approval The use was originally approved without a shelter building and as an auxiliary use to the golf course. Lighting 25 Foot High Parking lot lights and Approval with the 15 Foot High Isle lights condition not to exceed 15 feet in hei t Temporary structure Request for a temporary 12' octagon Approval with conditions building to serve as customer and employee building until the main buildin is completed. Building Material Ribbed metal is proposed as the Denial (variance required) exterior material for the maintenance building and ball washing building (ribbed metal is not permitted as an exterior finish on a building) Mr. Todd Gerhardt Halla Greens Planning Case No. 05-39 March 13, 2006 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the motions as specified beginning on pages 18 through 20 of the staff report dated February 27, 2006. ATTACHMENT 1. Planning Commission Staff Report. 2. Planning Commission Summary and Verbatim Minutes Dated February 7, 2006. gAplan\2005 planning cases\05-39 halls gne 03-07 site plan amendmenAezecutive summary.doc PROPOSED Recommendation Hours of Operation Request for an amendment to allow Denial 6:00a.m. to I1:00p.m. The conditional use permit criteria limits the hours of operation and maintenance of a golf course from sunrise to sunset. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the motions as specified beginning on pages 18 through 20 of the staff report dated February 27, 2006. ATTACHMENT 1. Planning Commission Staff Report. 2. Planning Commission Summary and Verbatim Minutes Dated February 7, 2006. gAplan\2005 planning cases\05-39 halls gne 03-07 site plan amendmenAezecutive summary.doc a r/ Z U MSI a CITY OF CHANHASSEN STAFF REPORT PC DATE: February 7, 2006 CC DATE: Febmar-y27,2006 March 13, 2006 REVIEW DEADLINE: Waived CASE #: 05-39 BY: Al-Jaff PROPOSAL: Request for a Site Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit Amendment with Variances for the construction of a golf course. LOCATION: Southeast Comer of the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Pioneer Trail. APPLICANT: John Kosmas KK Design 6112 Excelsior Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 55416 (952) 922-3226 iohnna,kkdesim.biz Don Halla Contact Person: Sandy Halla 6601 Mohawk Trail Edina, MN 55439 (952)941-8422 PRESENT ZONING: A-2, Agricultural Estate District 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential -Large Lot (2.5 Acre Minimum) 1/10 Acre Outside of MUSA ACREAGE: 45.99 acres DENSITY: N.A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: A site plan amendment for the expansion of a club house, enlarging a maintenance shed, and adding a golf ball cleaning building. Also requested is a conditional use permit amendment to add lights in the parking lot and the surrounding area. There are other requested amendments to the original conditions relating to items associated with the operation of a golf course as well as variances. Notice of the public hearing has been sent to property owners within 500 feet. Staff is recommending approval of some of the site plan amendments with conditions, approval of the conditional use permit amendments with conditions and denial of the variances. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan amendment. This is a quasi judicial decision. The City has limited discretion in approving or denying conditional use permits, based on whether or not the proposal meets the conditional use permit standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City finds that all the applicable conditional use permit standards are met, the permit must be approved. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. • Location Map Halla Greens (aka Chanhassen Short Course) Site Plan Amendment Planning Case No. 05-39 495 Pioneer Trail City of Chanhassen 14) SUBJECT SITE I a Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 2 of 20 On September 15, 2003, the City Council approved Conditional Use Permit 2003-4 CUP for the construction of a golf course with a club house as shown on plans dated August 25, 2003, with the following conditions: 1. Hours of operation shall be seasonal and limited to sunrise to sunset. 2. No outdoor speaker system shall be permitted (individual pager systems are permissible). 3. No commercial kitchen shall be permitted in the club house. There shall be no cooking equipment permitted on the premises with the exception of a microwave oven, pizza/toaster oven, etc. The intent of this condition is to put the golf course operator on notice. The proposed septic system design does not allow for any cooking grease to be disposed through the system which will cause the system to fail. 4. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit is contingent upon approval of Site Plan Review 2003-7 SPR. 5. Soil tests must be performed at least once a year. Results of all soil testing must be submitted to the City of Chanhassen. In addition, annual reports detailing all applications of fertilizer (including nutrient content for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium; application rate in pounds per acre; date of application; and total quantity of fertilizer applied) must be submitted to the City of Chanhassen. No fertilizer containing phosphorus may be applied unless the soil test results demonstrate a deficiency in phosphorus. 6. No grading, disturbance or dumping shall be permitted in areas designated as bluff or in bluff impact zones. Runoff from cart paths, fairways, greens or tee boxes on Hole 3 shall not be directed into bluff impact zones or bluff areas. 7. On-site grading may not increase the rte or volume of runoff downstream from the site or onto adjacent properties. 8. The applicant shall enter into a conditional use permit with the City. 9. No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety light." The City Council also approved Site Plan Review 2003-7 SPR for the construction of a Club House and a Maintenance Building for a golf course as shown in plans dated August 25, 2003, with conditions. The City approved a 40' x 60' pre -manufactured structure club house with an outdoor patio to be built on the subject site. The main exterior material is cedar siding which is permitted by ordinance. The proposed building is manufactured by Lester Buildings. A porch is proposed at the front portion of the building and a patio is proposed south of the building. Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 3 of 20 The above building is an example of the cedar siding building proposed by the applicant As an accessory use to this establishment, the applicant requested a 30' x 60' maintenance building. The main exterior material is proposed to be cedar siding to match the club house. The conditions of approval for Site Plan Review 2003-7 SPR for the construction of a Club House and a Maintenance Building for a golf course as shown in plans dated August 25, 2003, were as follows: Approval of the Site Plan Review application is contingent upon approval of Conditional Use Permit 2003-4 CUP. 2. All trees to be preserved must be protected by tree protection fencing. Fencing must be installed prior to grading. 3. No vegetation may be removed within the bluff impact zone. 4. The applicant shall provide a pedestrian/bikeway connection to the City's trail system at the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Pioneer Trail. 5. Fire Department Conditions: a. Please contact the Building Official and Fire Marshal to discuss the sprinklering requirements for the clubhouse and storage/maintenance building. b. If a Fire Hydrant is available, a 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Qwest, Excel Energy, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. c. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs and yellow curbing will be required. Please contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of signs and curbs to be painted yellow. d. The builder must comply with Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division regarding maximum allowable size of domestic water on a combination water/sprinkler supply line. This is only if a sprinkler is required. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division Policy #36-1994. e. The builder must comply with the Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division regarding premise identification. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention division Policy #29-1992. f. A post indicator valve will be required on any building that will have a sprinkler system. Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 4 of 20 g. Submit radius turns and dimensions to City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 6. Building Official Conditions: a. Submit a detailed floor plan of the clubhouse so the occupancy classification and fire suppression requirements can be determined. b. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. c. An accessible route must be provided to all facilities on the site. d. Submit a design of the on-site sewage treatment system for review and approval. Two sites must be provided and these sites must be protected from damage prior to beginning any construction activity on the site. The system must comply with the requirements of Minnesota Rules 7080.0600. e. Detailed occupancy related requirements cannot be reviewed until complete plans are submitted. f. The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review, permit procedures and fire suppression options. Engineering Department Conditions: a. Staff recommends that Type I silt fence be used along the northwesterly and southerly property lines. The applicant should be aware that any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. All disturbed areas are required to be restored with seed and mulch within two weeks of grading completion. b. Add the following City of Chanhassen Latest Detail Plates Numbers: 5201, 5203, 5207, 5300, and 3001 c. The applicant is responsible to obtain and comply with all regulators agency permits. d. On the grading plan add a bench mark. 8. The applicant must submit detailed architectural plans for the club house and maintenance building that meet the design ordinance requirement. 9• The applicant shall enter into a Site Plan Agreement and provide financial guarantees to insure compliance with the project. 10. Only one (1) monument sign may be permitted on the site. The total sign area shall not exceed twenty-four (24) square feet of sign display area, nor be more than five (5) feet in height. 11. The applicant is responsible to obtain and comply with a MnDOT and Carver County permit for the new access. 12. Per MnDOT's review memo, dated September 2, 2003, the need for a net along TH 101 will be evaluated upon completion of the golf course. If it is determined that a net is needed, then the applicant will be required to install it. Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 5 of 20 13. A hydrogeologic study shall be completed on the golf course site to show that there will be no impact to the surrounding wells. 14. Comply with all conditions of the Carver County review letter dated 8/29/03. 15. Comply with all conditions of the Mn/DOT review letter dated 8/26/03." LLLLLL-LLU L/ 11 -1 aot,� Proposed— HAL `y-G9rCVul8e — -, �I 14 LOCATION OF PROPOSED GOLF COURSE Construction on the golf course began approximately two years ago. The applicant has reevaluated the design of the club house along with some other accessory buildings. The main function of the golf course will not change but some of the design elements will. This report will address these changes. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is requesting a site plan and a conditional use permit amendment and a variance for the following: Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 6 of 20 The property is zoned A-2. The site has an area of 45.99 acres and currently gains access off of Pioneer Trail. The club house is proposed to be expanded and architecturally enhanced. The main material on the exterior of the building is proposed to be vinyl siding with a simulated cedar texture design. Parking has been constructed along the north portion of the building. The parking lot will be screened from views by a combination of berms and landscaping. The applicant is proposing to add parking lot lights for safety reasons. A number of neighbors have either e-mailed or telephoned staff and expressed their opposition to parking lot lights. The city code allows lights as long as they do not exceed half a foot candle at the property line. Such lights must also be shielded. Sec. 20-1123. Lighting. All commercial, industrial, and multifamily parking lots shall be lighted. Lighting shall use shielded fixtures and be directed away from the public right-of-way and adjacent WAS PROPOSED Club House 40' x 60' 40'x 66' Outdoor seating 10' x 60' covered porch 13'4" x 40' screened veranda on each areas without screening and a 1,413 end of the building and a 1,000 sq ft s ft aliopatio Maintenance 30' x 60' 68' x 120' with a 24' future addition building Ball washing None Proposed 32' x 24' Ball washing building bldg. Shelter building None Proposed 16' x 40' teaching shelter building. The use was originally approved without a shelter building and as an auxiliary use to the golf course. Lighting Lights attached to the building Parking lot lights Temporary Non Proposed Request for a temporary 12' octagon structure building to serve as customer and employee building. Building Material Wood was used as an exterior Ribbed metal is proposed as the exterior (variance material for the utility building material for the maintenance building required) and ball washing building (ribbed metal is not permitted as an exterior finish on a building) Hours of Sunrise to Sunset Request for an amendment to allow Operation 6:00a.m. to 11:00p.m. The conditional use permit criteria limits the hours of operation and maintenance of a golf course from sunrise to sunset. The property is zoned A-2. The site has an area of 45.99 acres and currently gains access off of Pioneer Trail. The club house is proposed to be expanded and architecturally enhanced. The main material on the exterior of the building is proposed to be vinyl siding with a simulated cedar texture design. Parking has been constructed along the north portion of the building. The parking lot will be screened from views by a combination of berms and landscaping. The applicant is proposing to add parking lot lights for safety reasons. A number of neighbors have either e-mailed or telephoned staff and expressed their opposition to parking lot lights. The city code allows lights as long as they do not exceed half a foot candle at the property line. Such lights must also be shielded. Sec. 20-1123. Lighting. All commercial, industrial, and multifamily parking lots shall be lighted. Lighting shall use shielded fixtures and be directed away from the public right-of-way and adjacent Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 7 of 20 residential or agricultural districts. Sufficient fighting shall be provided to illuminate all areas of the parking lot to provide adequate levels of safety. To minimize off-site impact, light levels as measured at the property line shall not exceed one -half -foot candle as measured at the property line. The applicant is proposing a combination of 25 -foot and 15 -foot high poles with a shielded fixture. The original plan showed the trash enclosure located west of the Maintenance Building. The enclosure was proposed to be built of cedar siding, which was the same material as that used on the building. The exterior material is proposed to be changed to ribbed metal. The zoning ordinance prohibits metal to be used as a main material on a building. Staff compared this request against the variance criteria and concluded that we must recommend denial of the use of metal as an exterior material. The original plan was approved with an identification sign. The ordinance allows monument signs not to exceed 24 square feet in area and 5 feet in height. Detailed sign plans shall be submitted for staffs review and approval. The original plan was approved to serve basket food in the club house. This amendment will not change the type of food served in the club house. The applicant is requesting operation hours be extended from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. The original approval limited operations from sunrise to sunset. The City Code limits the operation of a golf course as well as the maintenance to sunrise to sunset. Staff is recommending the hours of operation not change. A liquor license is required to serve beer on the premises. The applicant must submit a request to the City. A public hearing will be scheduled before the City Council when the application for the liquor license is received. Staff regards some of the requests as reasonable and is recommending approval of them, while others do not meet the intent of the ordinance; therefore, staff is recommending denial of them. The requested amendments that staff is recommending approval of include the site plan amendment for the expanded clubhouse, screened patio, lean-to and outdoor patio the- aintenanee building and gelf ball washing .^ build:^^ with conditions. Staff is recommending denial of the variance to allow metal as an exterior material on the maintenance, lean-to, and golf bail washing building, the expansion of the maintenance building and construction of a golf bail washing building. Staff is also recommending denial of the conditional use permit amendment to allow the change in hours of operation beyond sunrise to sunset. CONDITIONAL USE PERNUT Since this golf course was approved, the City adopted standards specific to golf courses and golf driving ranges. The general issuance standards have not changed. Golf courses and golf driving Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 8 of 20 ranges are permitted as a conditional use in the Agricultural Estate District. The following constitutes our findings: GENERAL ISSUANCE STANDARDS 1. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or city. Finding: The proposed use will not create any significant or unexpected impacts with the incorporation of staff's conditions. The use will provide a convenient location for residents in the area to practice an outdoor activity. 2. Will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and the zoning chapter. Finding: The proposed use is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan. 3. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. Finding: The site is surrounded by highly traveled roads. The proposed use is permitted within the district as a conditional use. It will be compatible with the area. The applicant is proposing a landscape buffer around the site to minimize impacts on the residential neighborhoods to the south, west and east. 4. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. Finding: The use will provide a convenience for existing or planned neighboring uses. 5. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. Finding: Public utilities and infrastructure are not available to the site. The site will be served by a well and an Individual Septic Treatment System (ISTS). 6. Will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Finding: The use will not create any excessive requirements for public facilities. 7. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 9 of 20 Finding: This site will not create adverse impacts to persons, property or the general welfare of the area. The proposed use will comply with city ordinances. 8. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. Finding: The site is accessible from Pioneer Trail and lines up with Foxford Road. Both MnDOT and Carver County Public Works have submitted guidelines and recommendations to facilitate the access to the property. As a condition of approval of the original request, the applicant obtained permits from these agencies. 9. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. Finding: The site originally contained nursery stock. Many of the trees were moved. They can be seen along the borders of the property. The use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance 10. Will be aesthetically compatible with the area. Finding: The proposed use will be compatible with the area. 11. Will not depreciate surrounding property values. Finding: The use will not depreciate surrounding property values. 12. Will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in Chapter 20, Article IV of the Chanhassen City Code. Finding: The proposed use will be required to meet the standards specified for golf courses in the Chanhassen City Code Section 20-258. Golf Course a. Hours of operation shall be from sunrise to sunset. Finding: The applicant has requested the hours be extended from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. The use is surrounded by residential neighborhoods and the hours of operation should remain sensitive to the surrounding area. b. Soil must be tested to determine fertilizing requirements. If necessary, the applicant/owner/lessee shall use slow release fertilizers applied at low rates or only as needed, use natural organic fertilizers whenever possible. The use of fertilizers shall be prohibited within the flood plain. Only Phosphorous free fertilizers shall be used. Finding: Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 10 of 20 use peffnit. Since this report was written, staff learned that under State Statute, golf courses are exempt from the phosphorous -free fertilizer requirement. As such, a condition has not been added prohibiting the use of phosphorous. c. The applicant/owner/lessee shall apply pesticides only when needed. Use products that are most effective, target specific, and present the least hazards to people, wildlife, and the environment. Finding: Staff will add this requirement as a condition of approval to the conditional use permit. d. The applicant/owner/lessee shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, i.e. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Army Corps of Engineers and Minnesota Department of Transportation and comply with their conditions of approval. Finding: Staff will add this requirement as a condition of approval to the conditional use permit. e. Annual reports of fertilizer use shall be provided to the city. Finding: This is an existing condition of the conditional use permit. A clubhouse may be permitted on the site. The clubhouse must be shown on the site plan and must comply with all building and zoning requirements. Finding: The applicant has shown a club house on the plans. g. A retail pro shop is permitted within the clubhouse. Retail operations shall not occupy more than 20% of one floor. Retail sales are limited to food, beverages, and golf related items. Finding: Staff will add this requirement as a condition of approval to the conditional use permit. h. All maintenance and other equipment must be kept in a screened storage area. Finding: The applicant is proposing to have all equipment stored in a maintenance shed. i. The golf course must be accessed from a collector or arterial roadway. Finding: The golf course will be accessed off of Pioneer Trail. Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 11 of 20 j. The site design shall minimize golf ball hazards. Finding: The applicant is required to install a net along Highway 101. k. Hours of maintenance operation shall be limited to sunrise to sunset. Finding: Staff will add this requirement as a condition of approval to the conditional use permit. 1. No outside speaker systems shall be allowed without approval from the city council. Finding: This is a requirement of the existing conditional use permit. m. A water consumption and use study must be submitted to the city for review. Finding: A study was submitted with the original application. Based upon the foregoing findings, staff is recommending that the conditional use permit amendment to allow change in hours of operation be denied. Staff is recommending approval of amending the conditional use permit to allow parking light fixtures for safety reasons. GENERAL SITE PLAN/ARCHITECTURE The proposed buildings will be utilized as a club house, maintenance building, and golf ball washing building. The club house will have a total area of 2,640 square feet (66' x 40'). The building is proposed to utilize vinyl siding with a simulated cedar texture design. A screened porch is proposed along each end of the building and a patio along the south. The site plan for the club house is attractive and meets the requirements of the design standards. The building has a residential feel with a pronounced entrance and architectural detail (windows, doors, columns, etc.) The club house is proposed to house a pro shop, office and a cafeteria. This function was approved with the original application and nothing is changing with this request. The maintenance, golf ball washing building, and lean-to are proposed to utilize metal as the exterior material. The city code specifically prohibits the use of metal as the main exterior material on a building. The applicant must change the exterior material to a material permitted by ordinance. The maintenance building is proposed to have an area of 8,160 square feet and the golf ball washing building is proposed to have an area of 768 square feet. The lean-to is a three - sided building with an area of 640 square feet and is proposed to be utilized as a shelter for the practice range. Staff is recommending the size of the maintenance building remain as was originally approved (1,800 square feet) with the golf ball washing building incorporated into the 1,800 square -foot maintenance building. Parking for vehicles is located north of the club house. The majority of the parking lot will be screened either by landscaping or berming. Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 12 of 20 The total hard surface coverage permitted by ordinance is 20%. The applicant is proposing a total hard surface coverage of 2.4%. ARCEUTECTURAL COMPLIANCE Size Portion Placement Entries The building has pronounced entrance that greets visitors and directs them to the front of the building. Articulation The building incorporates adequate detail and has been designed tastefully to fit the setting. The architectural style is unique to the building but will fit in with the surrounding area. The building will provide a variation in style through the use of the vinyl siding, dormer windows, porch and patio. The building is utilizing exterior materials that are permitted by ordinance. The maintenance building is hidden from view but the exterior material on the building must be changed from ribbed metal to another material permitted by ordinance. Staff is recommending the size of the maintenance building not exceed 1,800 square feet and that the golf ball washing building be incorporated into the maintenance building. Lighting Staff is recommending that outdoor lighting be limited to residential type lights attached to the building and parking lot lights be shielded but limited to 15 feet in height. Staff is also recommending that the golf course hours of operation be limited to sunrise to sunset. Signs A detailed sign plan is required. The sign shall meet ordinance requirements (area not to exceed 24 square feet and height not to exceed 5 feet). Material and detail High quality materials - accent material may occupy up to 15 percent of the buildings facade. The club house building will utilize vinyl as the main material. The maintenance buildings are proposing corrugated metal as the main material which is prohibited by ordinance. This building will likely still be used as the surrounding area becomes urbanized with municipal sewer and water. Color The colors chosen for this building are earth tones. The selection is unique to the building but blends in with the surrounding buildings. This is an area agricultural in nature and staff believes that the overall chosen materials and color will fit in with the surrounding area. Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 13 of 20 Height and Roof Design The building is proposed at a height of 27 feet. If the cupola is included, the height is 32 feet. The ordinance allows a maximum height of 35 feet. The porch along the sides of the building and the entire redesign of this building meets the design criteria dealing with pitched elements. Facade transparency All facades viewed by the public contain more than 50 percent windows and doors. All other areas will be landscaped. Site Furnishing The applicant has provided an outdoor seating area; however, the fiuniture has not been shown on the plans. The plans must be modified to show the chairs and tables. Loading areas/refuse area, etc. The trash enclosure is not shown on the plans. The original plans showed the enclosure next to the maintenance building. If there are any changes to this element, is should be shown on the Plans. The exterior material of the trash enclosure must match the proposed building's exterior material. Landscaping The site is fairly level. The landscaping plan will provide a variety of plant materials that are massed where possible. The berms and landscaping materials will be continuous along the Perimeter of the site. The plant materials are repetitious in some locations and variable in others. Proposed plant materials are indigenous to Minnesota. Staff is recommending additional landscaping to meet minimum ordinance requirements. Lot Frontage and Parking location The site is located at the southeast intersection of Pioneer Trail and Great Plains Boulevard. The parking will be screened by becoming and landscaping to meet ordinance requirements. SITE PLAN FINDINGS In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: (1) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (2) Consistency with this division; (3) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 14 of 20 (4) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; (5) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; C. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the comprehensive plan. There are areas that are in violation of the zoning ordinance. These areas will be corrected through the conditions of approval. The site design is compatible with the surrounding developments. It is functional and harmonious with the approved development for this area. Some of the buildings will need to be reduced in size or eliminated (expansion of the maintenance building and the proposed ball washing building). These buildings are entirely out -of -scale and are not needed or suitable for a small golf course. This is a very short nine -hole course (1,583 yards). No similar size golf course in the area has such large buildings for the indicated purposes. For example, the Halla Greens golf course has an area of 45.99 acres. Bluff Creek Golf Course, which lies approximately 1 mile west of the subject site, consists of 228.38 acres and has a 5,600 square -foot maintenance building. The size of the proposed Halla Greens maintenance building is 8,160 square feet (68 x 120) with a 24 -foot future addition. One analysis that can be used is to divide the building square footage into the acreage for comparison purposes. Bluff Creek has a 24.56 maintenance building square footage per acre verses Halla Greens request is for 181.33 square feet of maintenance building per acre. Staff is Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 15 of 20 recommending a 1,800 square -foot maintenance building which translates into 40 square feet of building per acre The requested buildings only make sense for use in conjunction with the nursery and landscaping business owned by the applicant's company on abutting property. These businesses are nonconforming. The buildings would be used to expand nonconforming businesses in violation of the City's zoning ordinance. The City has previously litigated this issue and entered into a stipulation for entry of judgment that details the allowed nonconforming uses. Staff regards the project as a reasonable use of the land. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan amendment for the club house with conditions outlined in the staff report. Staff is also recommending the maintenance building not exceed 1,800 square feet in area with the golf ball washing building incorporated into the maintenance building. MISCELLANEOUS Soil tests should be performed at least once a year. Results of all soil testing should be submitted to the City of Chanhassen. In addition, annual reports detailing all applications of fertilizer (including nutrient content for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium; application rate in pounds Per acre; date of application; and total quantity of fertilizer applied) should be submitted to the City of Chanhassen. No fertilizer containing phosphorus should be applied unless the soil test results demonstrate a deficiency in phosphorus. Also, on-site grading should not increase the rate or volume of runoff downstream from the site or onto adjacent properties. Staff is recommending the request for a temporary 12 -foot octagon building to serve as customer and employee building be approved. The structure will be removed as soon as the club house has received a certificate of occupancy. Staff is recommending that the temporary building be Permitted for a maximum on 12 months or when the certificate of occupancy for the club house has been issued, whichever comes first. Bluff Halla Creek Greens Acreage 228.38 45.99 Maintenance Building 5,600 Sq. 1,800 Sq. Ft. Ft. Building Sq. Ft. per Acre 24.56 40 Halla Greens Requested 24.56 181.33 Maintenance Building Sq. Ft. per Acre The requested buildings only make sense for use in conjunction with the nursery and landscaping business owned by the applicant's company on abutting property. These businesses are nonconforming. The buildings would be used to expand nonconforming businesses in violation of the City's zoning ordinance. The City has previously litigated this issue and entered into a stipulation for entry of judgment that details the allowed nonconforming uses. Staff regards the project as a reasonable use of the land. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan amendment for the club house with conditions outlined in the staff report. Staff is also recommending the maintenance building not exceed 1,800 square feet in area with the golf ball washing building incorporated into the maintenance building. MISCELLANEOUS Soil tests should be performed at least once a year. Results of all soil testing should be submitted to the City of Chanhassen. In addition, annual reports detailing all applications of fertilizer (including nutrient content for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium; application rate in pounds Per acre; date of application; and total quantity of fertilizer applied) should be submitted to the City of Chanhassen. No fertilizer containing phosphorus should be applied unless the soil test results demonstrate a deficiency in phosphorus. Also, on-site grading should not increase the rate or volume of runoff downstream from the site or onto adjacent properties. Staff is recommending the request for a temporary 12 -foot octagon building to serve as customer and employee building be approved. The structure will be removed as soon as the club house has received a certificate of occupancy. Staff is recommending that the temporary building be Permitted for a maximum on 12 months or when the certificate of occupancy for the club house has been issued, whichever comes first. Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 16 of 20 SIGNAGE Section 20-1301 of the sign ordinance allows non-residential use in Agricultural Estate Districts to have only one (1) monument sign on the site. The total sign area shall not exceed twenty-four (24) square feet of sign display area, nor be more than five (5) feet in height. PARIGNG The ordinance requires 20 parking spaces plus 1 space for each 500 square feet of floor area in the principal structure. The total parking spaces required are 25 spaces. The applicant is Proposing 104 parking spaces. BLUFF No grading, disturbance or dumping is permitted in areas designated as bluff or in bluff impact zones. Runoff from cart paths, fairways, greens or tee boxes on Hole 3 should not be directed into bluff impact zones or bluff areas. WETLANDS No wetlands exist on site. LANDSCAPING Minimum requirements for landscaping include 2,860 square feet of landscaped area around the Parking lot, 11 trees for the parking lot, and bufferyard plantings along Pioneer Trail. The applicant's proposed landscape as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table: The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for parking lot landscape plantings. Staff recommends that totals for landscaping be increased in order to meet minimum requirements as shown in the table. Additionally, according to ordinance, parking lots shall be fully screened from the street. This will require berming or more understory trees and shrubs to be planted along the street frontages. Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 2,860 sq. ft. >2,860 sq. ft. Trees/landscape area 11 canopy trees 0 canopy trees 6 islands/peninsulas 6 islands/peninsulas Pioneer Trail 11 canopy trees 108 canopy bufferyard B —1140' 23 understory trees 22 understory (applicant's ldscp is 50' in 23 shrubs 61 shrubs width The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for parking lot landscape plantings. Staff recommends that totals for landscaping be increased in order to meet minimum requirements as shown in the table. Additionally, according to ordinance, parking lots shall be fully screened from the street. This will require berming or more understory trees and shrubs to be planted along the street frontages. Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 17 of 20 COMPLIANCE TABLE — A2 DISTRICT VARIANCE The applicant is requesting several variances including corrugated metal to be used as the exterior material of the maintenance buildings, and allowing the golf course to be open from 6:00 am. to 11:00 p.m. when the ordinance requires hours of operation to be limited to sunrise to sunset. FINDINGS The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts: a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing downward from them meet these criteria. Finding: The literal enforcement of this chapter does not cause an undue hardship. The applicant has reasonable use of the property. The site did receive a conditional use permit to operate as a golf course. Hours of operation of sunrise to sunset are reasonable. The exterior material of the maintenance buildings can be changed to meet ordinance requirements. b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. Finding: The conditions upon which this variance is based are applicable to all properties that lie within the Agricultural Estate District. Ordinance Short Course Total Lot Area 10 Acres 45.99 Acres Lot Frontage 200' 1215' Lot Depth 200' 1170' Lot Coverage 20% 2.4% Total Parking Stalls 25 104 Building Height 1 story 1 story Building Setback N - 50' S - 10' E - 50' W - 10' N-110' S-500' E - 260' W - 270' VARIANCE The applicant is requesting several variances including corrugated metal to be used as the exterior material of the maintenance buildings, and allowing the golf course to be open from 6:00 am. to 11:00 p.m. when the ordinance requires hours of operation to be limited to sunrise to sunset. FINDINGS The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts: a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing downward from them meet these criteria. Finding: The literal enforcement of this chapter does not cause an undue hardship. The applicant has reasonable use of the property. The site did receive a conditional use permit to operate as a golf course. Hours of operation of sunrise to sunset are reasonable. The exterior material of the maintenance buildings can be changed to meet ordinance requirements. b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. Finding: The conditions upon which this variance is based are applicable to all properties that lie within the Agricultural Estate District. Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 18 of 20 c. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. Finding: Extending the hours of operation is based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the subject property. d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship. Finding: The applicant can meet the requirements of the ordinance. The fact that a choice has been made to use exterior materials that are prohibited by ordinance is a self-created hardship. e. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. Finding: The granting of a variance to allow extended hours of operations will disturb the quiet surrounding neighborhoods Traffic, light and noise would be generated during evening hours when residents rightly have the expectation of quietude. f. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Finding: The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following motions: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT "The City Council approve an amendment to Conditional Use Permit 2003-4 CUP — Planning Case 05-39, for the construction of a golf course with a club house as shown in plans dated received January 6, 2006, with the following amendment to condition #9 of the existing conditional use permit and adding conditions 10 and 11: 9. No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety lights which includes parking lot lights and drive aisle lights. The height of the light pole may not exceed 15 feet. All light fixtures must meet ordinance requirements. 10. The applicant/owner/lessee shall apply pesticides only when needed. Use products thal are most effective, target specific, and present the least hazards to people, wildlife, and the environment. Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 19 of 20 11. A retail pro shop is permitted within the clubhouse. Retail operations shall not occupy more than 20% of one floor. Retail sales are limited to food, beverages, and golf -related items. 12. Hours of maintenance operation shall be limited to sunrise to sunset." SITE PLAN REVIEW 'The City Council approve an amendment to Site Plan Review 2003-7 SPR — Planning Case 05- 39, for the construction of a Club House, and a lean-to for a golf course as shown in plans dated received January 6, 2006, and denies the expansion of the Maintenance Building and construction of a golf ball washing building with the following added conditions: 1. Applicant shall increase landscape plantings to meet minimum requirements for parking lot trees. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the City and approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. Applicant shall fully screen parking lots from adjacent roadways through the use of berming or increased landscaping. 3. The applicant must submit detailed architectural plans for the maintenance building, golf ball washing building, mdw lean-to that meet the design ordinance requirement. 4. Comply with all conditions of the MnDOT review letter dated November 23, 2005. 5. The temporary 120 square -foot octagon building is permitted for a maximum of 12 months from the day the City Council approves this application or when the certificate of occupancy for the club house has been issued, whichever comes first. 6. The applicant is responsible for obtaining and complying with MnDOT and Carver County permits and approval on any grading that takes place along the north and west side of the property. 7. All disturbed areas are required to be restored with seed and mulch within two weeks of grading completion. 8. All plans must be signed by a professional civil engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. 9. The golf ball washing building shall be incorporated into the 1,800 square foot maintenance building. 10. The maintenance building may not be used for "Halla Nursery" related items nor exceed 1,800 square feet in area." Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 20 of 20 VARIANCE "The City Council denies Variance — Planning Case 05-39, for corrugated metal to be used as the exterior material of the maintenance and golf ball washing buildings, and denies the golf course to be open from 6:00 am. to 11:00 p.m. based upon the findings in the staff report and the following: 1. The applicant has not demonstrated a hardship. 2. The property owner has reasonable use of the property." ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 2. Application. 3. Revised narrative dated January 6, 2006. 4. E -Mail from David and Sharon Gatto dated December 19, 2005. 5. E -Mail from Bill O'Neil dated December 23, 2005. 6. E -Mail from June Ebrahim dated December 27, 2005. 7. E -Mail from Cindy and Don Deal dated December 27, 2005. 8. E -Mail from Elaine Sievers dated December 29, 2005. 9. E -Mail from Gaye Guyton dated February 5, 2006. 10. E -Mail from Jim Hautman dated February 6, 2006 11. E -Mail from Dave and Judy Walstad dated February 6, 2006. 12. E -Mail from Tom Anderson dated February 7, 2006. 13. Letter dated November 8, 2005, updated December 20, 2005, waiving the 120 days. 14. Letter from MnDOT dated November 23, 2005. 15. Letter from Geneva & Jeff Sorum dated 1/25/06. 16. Plans dated August 26, 2003. 17. Public Hearing notice and property owners list within 500 feet. g:\plan\2005 planning cases\05-39 Balla greens 03-07 site plan amendment\staff report.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION IN RE: Application of Don Halla requesting a Site Plan Amendment, conditional use permit amendment, and variances for a golf course: HALLA GREENS — Planning Case No. 05-39. On March 13, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Don Halla for a conditional use permit amendment, site plan amendment, and variances for the property located at the southeast comer of the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Pioneer Trail. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the applications which was preceded by published and mailed notice and has made recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Agricultural Estate District, A2. 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Residential —Large Lot. 3. The legal description of the property is: The NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 25, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota ("subject property"). 4. On September 15, 2003, the City approved Conditional Use Permit 2003-4 and Site Plan 2003-7 SPR for a golf course on the subject property. The applicant now seeks amendments to the previous approvals as well as variances. 5. The table below summarizes the proposed changes and variances: 123914v05 RNK:103/08/2006 PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED APPROVED Club House 40' x 60' 40'x 66' Outdoor 10' x 60' covered porch 13'4" x 40' screened veranda on seating areas without screening and a 1,413 each end of the building and a sq ft patio 1,000 sq ft patio Maintenance 30' x 60' 68' x 120' with a 24' future building addition Ball washing None Proposed 32' x 24' Ball washing buildin_ building Shelter None Proposed 16' x 40' teaching shelter building building. The use was originally approved without a shelter building and as an auxiliary use to the golf course. 123914v05 RNK:103/08/2006 6. The City Council shall issue such conditional use permit only if it finds that such use at the proposed location: a. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or city. b. Will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and the zoning chapter. c. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. d. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. e. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. Will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. g. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. 123914v05 RNK:rO3/08/2006 PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED APPROVED Ughting Lights attached to the building Parking lot lights Temporary None Proposed Request for a temporary 12' structure octagon building to serve as customer and employee building. Building Wood was used as an exterior Ribbed metal is proposed as the Material material for the utility building exterior material for the (variance maintenance building and ball required) washing building. Ribbed metal is not permitted as an exterior finish on a building. Hours of Sunrise to Sunset Request for an amendment to Operation allow 6:00a.m. to 11:00p.m. (variance The zoning ordinance limits the required) hours of operation and maintenance of a golf course from sunrise to sunset. 6. The City Council shall issue such conditional use permit only if it finds that such use at the proposed location: a. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or city. b. Will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and the zoning chapter. c. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. d. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. e. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. Will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. g. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. 123914v05 RNK:rO3/08/2006 h. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. i. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. j. Will be aesthetically compatible with the area. k. Will not depreciate surrounding property values. 1. Will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in Chapter 20, Article IV of the Chanhassen City Code. 7. In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: a. Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; b. Consistency with this division; c. Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; d. Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; e. Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; 2. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; 3. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and 4. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. 123914x05 1WK:r03/08/2006 f. Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 8. The proposed amendment to the Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan, excluding the variance applications, meet ordinance requirements with the following exceptions: The expansion of the maintenance building and the proposed ball washing building. These buildings are entirely out - of -scale and are not needed or suitable for a small golf course. This is a very short, nine hole course, 1,583 yards. No similar size golf course in the area has such large buildings for the indicated purposes. The buildings only make sense for use in conjunction with the nursery and landscaping business owned by the applicant's company on abutting property. These businesses are nonconforming. The buildings would be used to expand nonconforming businesses in violation of the City's zoning ordinance. The City has previously litigated this issue and entered into a stipulation for entry of judgment that details the allowed nonconforming uses. 9. Bluff Creek Golf Course in Chanhassen has 228.38 acres and 5,600 square foot maintenance building. The Halla Greens golf course has an area of 45.99 acres. The size of the proposed expanded maintenance building on the subject property is 8,160 square feet without the possible future addition for which approval is also requested. Bluff Creek has a 24.56 maintenance building square footage per acre verses the applicant's proposal for 181.33 square feet of maintenance building per acre. 10. The Applicant seeks variances from City Code § 20-258, hours of operation of a golf course, and §§ 20-116B and 20-1065, allowed exterior materials. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts: a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing downward from them meet these criteria. 123914v05 4 RNKA3/08/2006 Bluff Creek Subject Property Acreage 228.38 45.99 Maintenance Building 5,600 Sq. Ft. 1,800 Sq. Ft. (approved) Building Sq. Ft. per Acre 24.56 40 proposed 8,1600 square foot Maintenance Building on Subject Property Sq. Ft. per Acre 181.33 10. The Applicant seeks variances from City Code § 20-258, hours of operation of a golf course, and §§ 20-116B and 20-1065, allowed exterior materials. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts: a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing downward from them meet these criteria. 123914v05 4 RNKA3/08/2006 Finding: The literal enforcement of this chapter does not cause an undue hardship. The applicant has reasonable use of the property. The site has a conditional use permit to operate a golf course. Hours of operation of sunrise to sunset are reasonable. The exterior material of the maintenance buildings can be changed to meet ordinance requirements. b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. Finding: The conditions upon which this variance is based are applicable to all properties that lie within the Agricultural Estate District. c. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. Finding: Extending the hours of operation is based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the subject property. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self- created hardship. Finding: The applicant can meet the requirements of the ordinance. The fact that a choice has been made to use exterior materials that are prohibited by ordinance is a self-created hardship. e. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located Finding: The granting of a variance to allow extended hours of operations will disturb the quiet surrounding neighborhoods Traffic, light and noise would be generated during evening hours when residents rightly have the expectation of quietude. f. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Finding: The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets. 123914v05 KNK:rO3/08/2006 The City Council approves in part and denies in part the site plan and conditional use permit amendments, and denies the variance applications. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 13"' day of March, 2006. ATTEST: CITY OF CHANHASSEN Todd Gerhardt, City Clerk/Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor 123914vO5 RNK:A3/08/2006 1.i r - f 110 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard – P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 – (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Applicant Name and Address: O N Z� E214/VA A,-( Al 3 Contact: 1,1/v,,,7 WA h_ Ai A Phone:a,A-/ /-1 Hdd, Fax: Email: r -Ph- AAIPCO1 WAJ — l0!/G 'tF% 4OX f & Pi9r¢K a AW 554/!0 �r---.,.-Co 1 '--nt J)1 91-1 ZZ, 57-; Conditional Use Permit Interim Use Permit Non -conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development' Rezoning Sign Permits _ Sign Plan Review Site Plan Review* Subdivision* Planning Case No. 6s-35 Owner Name and Address: c r /if] M Al 3 r 11 Contact:'— Phone:ysa-�Zy7-Fy Fax: Email: Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Variance Wetland Alteration Permit Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment X Notification Sign** - $75 + $100 Damage Deposit X Escrow for F U Fees/Attorney Cost*** - $50 CUP/ PACNAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds - $450 Minor SUB 0 TOTAL FEE $ rf7 �p � An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8%" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital cop v in TIFF -Group 4 (*.tif) format. " Applicant to obtain notification sign from City of Chanhassen Public Works at 1591 Park Road and install upon submittal of completed application. $100 damage deposit to be refunded to applicant when sign is returned following City Council approval. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. !CANNED PROJECT NAME: H A L L tJ EE/Y j y��(�j/�OJ� s Lgc7�✓4� LOCATION:q� LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 17r1 AL1 TOTAL ACREAGE: WETLANDS PRESENT: YES NO PRESENT ZONING: REQUESTED ZONIh PRESENT LAND USL v�o,vry i i ivrv: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REASON FOR REQUEST: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to procee th th study. The do uments and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. %/ 0 Signature of Applicant d19— Z v 5 OS Signature of Fee Owner Da SCANNED G:\plan\forms\Development Review Application.DOC Rev. 4/05 n �J January 6, 2006 OFCHANHASSEN RECEIVED Re: Halla Greens (Chanhassen Short Course) 1 0 6 2006 Pioneer Trail (Co. Rd. 14) and Highway 101 (Great Plains Boulevard)-HANHASSENPLANMNGOW Chanhassen, MN Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner City of Chanhassen I have reviewed the previously approved Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review, Case Nos. 2003-7 SPR and 2003-4 CUP, for a Golf Course at the above noted address. Going through the eighteen (18) page document the following items have been determined to needing further review or revision: (Location of original information is noted in the parenthesis). 1. Size and quantity of buildings proposed for the function of the course. (Arch. Compliance data) a. Clubhouse was 40'x 60', with a 10' by 60' covered porch without screening and a patio on the south side of the building. The proposed structure will be a 40'x 66' main building with a 13'-4" x 40'-0" screened in veranda, on each end of the building, overall roofed area will be 92'- 8" x 40'-0". The outside patio will be approximately 1,000 square feet at the southwest comer of the building. b. Maintenance Building was 30'x 60' located east of the clubhouse building. The proposed structure will be a 68'x 120' building remaining on the east side of the clubhouse. The building will be a wood frame structure with vertical prefinished metal rib siding. The lower 48 inch portion of the wall area will be a green color with the balance above a cream color. The building will be positioned such that a 24 foot future addition can be constructed as the need develops. C. Ball washing building was not noted on the original plans. The proposed structure will be a 32'x 24' building, located south east of the Clubhouse and south of the Maintenance Building. It will be a wood frame structure of matching materials and colors to the Maintenance building. d. Teaching shelter was not noted on the original plans. The proposed structure will be 16'x 40' building, located west of the driving range. It will be a wood frame lean -too type structure of matching materials and colors to the Maintenance building. The building will allow an instructor and student(s) practice area protected from the elements. KKO - HALLA GREENS - CUP / SPR UPDATE INFORMATION 1-6-06 1 K K DESIGN 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD. ST.LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 (952) 922 - 3226 0 0 2. Exterior finish of the buildings. (Arch. Compliance data) a. Clubhouse building was originally noted as cedar materials. The proposed building will include vinyl siding, pvc non -maintenance trim boards. The vinyl siding will be a simulated cedar texture design, earth tone color. The trim boards will be white along with the prefinished windows. The roofing material will be asphalt type shingles. b. Maintenance building will remain as a wood frame pole building type construction with metal exterior finish. The colors will again be from the earth tone color pallet, green and cream. C. The Ball washing building will be wood frame and finished similar to the Maintenance building both in materials and colors. d. The Teaching shelter building will be wood frame and finished similar to the Maintenance building and Ball washing building both in materials and colors. 3. Height and roof design of the clubhouse building. (Arch. Compliance data) a. Staff report represents the height to be 12 feet, one story. The building will remain one story, with a small equipment platform at the center of the building. The overall height of the main roof is 27 feet not including the copula. Including the copula it is 32 feet. b. The roof shape was original shown as a single gable roof with a shed roof at the covered porch. The proposed building will consist of a main hip roof over the main building and verandas. The two entry roofs are gables to the north and south. The main roof also includes two shed roof dormers for interior daylight and accent in the gathering area. Shingles will be heavy weight asphalt design. 4. Signs: (SPR 13) Original approval indicates a maximum size of 24 square feet with a 5 foot maximum height. The proposed sign is noted as a 4 foot high by 6 foot wide sign meeting the maximum sign area allowed of 24 square feet. The final copy included on the sign has not been determined at this date. The location is noted adjacent to the entrance drive located on Co. Rd. 14 (Pioneer Trail). The sign will be internally lit. 5. Lighting: (CUP 9) CUP and SPR indicated that the lighting would be limited to residential type lights attached to the building. It also discusses the concept of having the operational hours as sunrise to sunset thus eliminating the need for parking lot and golf course lighting. CUP condition No. 9 states "No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety light". Upon evaluating the operational aspects of the course two issues are raised: 1. for "safety" the parking lot should have lighting for both the customers and employees who arrive before sunrise and leave after KKD - HALLA GREENS - CUP / SPR UPDATE INFORMATION 1-6-06 2 K K DESIGN 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD. ST.LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 (952) 922 - 3226 0 0 sunset. Typically a minimum lighting level that is recommended by the law enforcement groups would be an average1 foot candle at all public walkways etc. It is also recommended for security of the buildings and equipment a minimal light level should be maintained through out the evening hours to reduce vandalism etc. 2. The course currently includes a driving range and in the future a family miniature golf course, both of which require the use of lighting during the evening hours of operation. Therefore, the current restrictions need to be modified to provide for proper safety and operation of the business, thus allowing lighting for the driving range and future miniature golf area. At this time the proposed lighting plan for the parking lot and entrance drive is below the city guidelines of .5 foot candles at the property line with readings ranging from "0" foot candles to .2 foot candles. The maximum proposed is less than 50 percent of the city guidelines. Lighting for the driving range is currently being evaluated and the information should be available shortly. 6. Facade transparency: (Architectural Compliance data) The evaluation comment that states, "All facades viewed by the public must contain more than 50 percent windows". The proposed front (north) elevation contains 25 percent glass windows and doors using the wall area only. If the screened in portion of the verandas are included in the area the percentage changes to 49 percent. Therefore some adjustment needs to be made allowing the slightly lesser percentage. 7. The parking setback from Co. Rd. 14 (Pioneer Trail) to be 50 feet. The proposed curb line is located at 50.2 feet and will be maintained. The original berming and landscaping will be modified to maintain desired drainage required along side Co. Rd. 14. The parking is depressed about 4 feet from the road surface thus eliminating the need to screen headlight glare towards the roadway. For visual enhancement plantings compatible with the soil, snow, salt and drainage conditions will be installed, including wild flowers and water tolerant trees. 8. There is no mention of the Clubhouse being open year around. Since they have the facilities for coffee and sandwiches it makes sense that they have the option to be open all year rather than just the summer period. I request that the language included with the CUP includes the statement that the facility will be open for 12 months, not just seasonal. I also recommend that the reference that they will be open from sunrise to sunset be deleted. The statement should read, "The facility will maintain normal business hours", example 6:00 AM to 11:00 PM. 9. Original application did not include the request for a temporary building facility for daily operations during the period when the main buildings are under construction. Due to the current schedule of construction I request that a facility be allowed to serve as a temporary customer and employee building. The facility would allow customers to pay KKD - HALLA GREENS - CUP / SPR UPDATE INFORMATION 1-6-06 3 K K DESIGN 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD. ST.LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 (952) 922 - 3226 greens fees schedule tee times etc. The structure would be a 12 foot octagon shaped structure constructed of wood framing. It will be a moveable structure without any footings. It will include temporary electric and phone services. Temporary sanitary facilities will be provided for both men and women. Please reference attached data sheet for general information about site and parking data. Thank you, ciut"11 VW1W John Kosmas 952-922-3226 L�esign biz cc: Don Halla @952-445-6557 (Fax) - HALLA GREENS - CUP / SPR UPDATE INFORMATION 1-6-06 4 K K DESIGN 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD. ST.LOIJIS PARK, MN 55416 (952) 922 - 3226 0 HALLA GREENS, LLC. PROPERTY LOCATION: DATA SHEET 0 January 5, 2006 495 PIONEER TRAIL ST. HIGHWAY 101 AND CO. RD. 14 CHANHASSEN,MN LOT AREA: 45.2 ACRES (1,968,912 sf) HARDSURFACE COVERAGE 77,169 SF OR 4 PERCENT OF TOTAL LOT AREA (Bldgs. Parking, Driveways and Paths) PROPOSED BUILDING AREA: CLUBHOUSE BUILDING: VERANDAS AND VESTIBULES MAINTENANCE BUILDING: BALL BUILDING: TEACHING SHELTER: TOTAL PARKING REQUIREMENTS: NUMBER OF STALLS: (Clubhouse — 2,640 sf.) SETBACK: SIGN REQUIREMENTS: SIGN AREA: SIGN SETBACK: 2,640 S.F. 1,501 S.F. 8,160 S.F. 768 S.F. 640 S.F. 13,709 S.F. CITY GUIDELINE 20 STALLS PLUS 1 PER 500 SF. FLOOR AREA = 26 stalls PROPOSED 100 std. sails 4 H/C stalls 104 total stalls 50 FEET FROM R.O.W. 50.2 FEET 24 SQ. FT. 24 SQ. FT. 10 FEET FROM R.O.W. 10 FEET KKD - HALLA GREENS - CUP / SPR UPDATE INFORMATION 1-6-06 5 K K DESIGN 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD. ST.LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 (952) 922 - 3226 • AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: DavidGatto@aol.com Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 5:28 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Cc: sharon.G@prodigy.net; ksasplin@ties2.net; Beverlycerickson@aol.com Subject: Re: Halla Greens; Conditional Use Permit Sharmeen, I authorize for public record that; Page 1 of 1 Sharon and David Gatto are opposed to any lighting of the Halla Green's Facility, other than residential type fixtures on the outside of the building for security purposes. We will be opposed to ANY commercial activity after dark, as that has never been conducted on that property, and never was apparent with the approval and construction of an "Executive Golf Course". I have personally observed the complete installation of underground electric wiring consistent with commercial parking lot lighting on the property in the parking lot along Pioneer Trail. That wiring is in place now without a permit to have lighting. We have to consider why the Owner placed the wiring without prior approval or permit. We also need to consider what the Owner's final intent is. We are opposed to any additional support buildings other than one "club house", to be used ONLY for purposes that support the golf facility. We will oppose additional construction beyond the one clubhouse. We will oppose additional construction because the construction that has apparently been completed may be incorrect with respect to its intended function, and is in violation of the present permits issued. This facility has been under construction for over two years now. They routinely violate the neighborhood with construction noise before 7am and frequently during the entire evening period during the summer months. They have constructed and demolished the two boulder pond retaining structures along Pioneer Trail several times. This activity always did include at least one or more bobcats with backup alarms and other construction noise that disturb our neighborhood. Additionally, I request the City of Chanhassen along with the State of Minnesota inspect the ponds. We understand the ponds are constructed as water retention structures. It can clearly be observed that the lining of the ponds is incomplete and damaged and cannot function in accordance with the intended use as a water retention structure, unless the plastic lining that is in place is in addition to certain clay that would function to control water seepage. If a permit to construct a building is issued to this property owner, I would suggest the City of Chanhassen strictly monitor this owner for construction in accordance with their plans and specifications along with City Ordnances and rules that control the time of construction. David and Sharon Gatto 9631 Foxford Road Chanhassen MN 1/22/2006 Page 1 of 1 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: DavidGatto@aol.com Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 5:28 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Cc: sharon.G@prodigy.net; ksasplin@ties2.net; Beverlycerickson@aol.com Subject: Re: Halla Greens; Conditional Use Permit Sharmeen, I authorize for public record that; Sharon and David Gatto are opposed to any lighting of the Halla Green's Facility, other than residential type fixtures on the outside of the building for security purposes. We will be opposed to ANY commercial activity after dark, as that has never been conducted on that property, and never was apparent with the approval and construction of an "Executive Golf Course". I have personally observed the complete installation of underground electric wiring consistent with commercial parking lot lighting on the property in the parking lot along Pioneer Trail. That wiring is in place now without a permit to have lighting. We have to consider why the Owner placed the wiring without prior approval or permit. We also need to consider what the Owner's final intent is. We are opposed to any additional support buildings other than one "club house", to be used ONLY for purposes that support the golf facility. We will oppose additional construction beyond the one clubhouse. We will oppose additional construction because the construction that has apparently been completed may be incorrect with respect to its intended function, and is in violation of the present permits issued. This facility has been under construction for over two years now. They routinely violate the neighborhood with construction noise before 7am and frequently during the entire evening period during the summer months. They have constructed and demolished the two boulder pond retaining structures along Pioneer Trail several times. This activity always did include at least one or more bobcats with backup alarms and other construction noise that disturb our neighborhood. Additionally, I request the City of Chanhassen along with the State of Minnesota inspect the ponds. We understand the ponds are constructed as water retention structures. It can clearly be observed that the lining of the ponds is incomplete and damaged and cannot function in accordance with the intended use as a water retention structure, unless the plastic lining that is in place is in addition to certain clay that would function to control water seepage. If a permit to construct a building is issued to this property owner, I would suggest the City of Chanhassen strictly monitor this owner for construction in accordance with their plans and specifications along with City Ordnances and rules that control the time of construction. David and Sharon Gatto 9631 Foxford Road Chanhassen MN 3/6/2006 Page 1 of 1 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Bill O'Neill [bill.oneill@williamj.com] Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 8:21 AM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: Halla Sharmeen, I am a Lake Riley Woods Home owner and wanted to let you know that I oppose the changes that Halla is trying to make by adding all of the lighting. 9550 Foxford Road William J. (Bill) O Neill CEO William J. Business Interiors www.williamj.com (952) WILLIAMJ 3/6/2006 Page 1 of 1 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Frorn: June Ebrahim jjunee@ersdigital.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 11:22 AM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: halla Hello Sharmeen, My name is June Ebrahim, I live directly across from the new golf course my property butts up to pioneer trail. I have to say in the beginning we were pretty excited about the golf course going in, however the latest developments is far from exciting and is down right infuritating. my question is why parking lights, its a golf course who can play golf at night. I have alot more to say and i will definetly be @ the meeting on the 3rd. really must work now 3/6/2006 Page 1 of 1 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: CADeal@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 2:31 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: Don Halla We live at 9390 Foxford Road and are writing to oppose Don Halla's parking lights. Cindy and Don Deal 3/6/2006 Page 1 of 1 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Elaine Sievers [elainesievers@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 7:28 PM To: AWaff, Sharmeen Dear Sharmeen, We are writing this letter to express deep concern regarding the Halla golf course construction on Pioneer Trail. We are part of the Lake Riley Woods community and we, along with the other residents, have worked hard to make our community beautiful and safe. It is our understanding that a parking lot with lights is planned on Pioneer Trail. We very much oppose this parking lot with lights, and feel that it is not only a direct violation of the initial agreement with the City of Chanhassen, but it will also most certainly be a blot of ugliness on the neighborhood property and surely not an astute or caring investment in safety for us and for our children. Please take this matter seriously. The City of Chanhassen should indeed be a city that cares first and foremost about the safety and welfare of its citizens. You in the decision-making positions need to guide but also constantly monitor what is happening in our city and correct any infringements on citizen rights. Therefore, we will appreciate your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Harold and Elaine Sievers 9491 Foxford Road Chanhassen, MN 55317 3/6/2006 Page 1 of 3 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Weread4fun@aol.com Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 2:18 PM To: AWaff, Sharmeen Subject: Halla Greens February 4, 2006 To Sharmeen Al-Jaff and the Chanhassen City Council: I am writing with regard to the planning commission's staff report concerning Halla Greens. I live in the white colonial house directly behind Dave and Judy Walstad's home and have owned my land for almost a dozen years. Over these many years, I have seen how disrespectfully Don Halla treats the neighbors on this side of Pioneer Trail and how he creates his own rules to suit his wishes, no matter what we and the City of Chanhassen have to say. Though Halla Nursery's big trucks use the access road in front of our homes many times daily during the growing season, he has never once offered to help repair the ruts left by his heavy machinery. In fact, he has claimed that he has a right not to be responsible, since he was here first. He continues to dump loads of waste from Halla Nursery an average of once a day during the summer into the ravine near Jim and Dorothy Hauptmann's home despite being asked numerous times by the city and the neighbors to stop. Is this legal? Though I was optimistic about the Chanhassen Short Course when it was initially proposed by Ron Saatser and Don Halla, and spoke in favor of it in 2003 at a city council meeting, I am very concerned with the site plan amendments and variances he and John Kosmas have now proposed. Those items and my concerns are listed below. First, in the initial plans that were approved in the fall of 2003, there were four items of profound importance to the neighbors: 1. Hours of operation will be seasonal, limited from sunrise to sunset. 2. No outdoor speaker system is permitted. 3. No commercial kitchen shall be permitted in the clubhouse. 4. No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety lights. 1. I do not believe the hours of operation should be changed from what were initially proposed. They should be limited to seasonal use from sunrise to sunset, and strictly enforced as originally agreed to. The land is zoned for agricultural use, and while running a golf course fits within these guidelines, the extended hours and year-round operation proposed by John Kosmas sound more like a commercial restaurant/business use than an agricultural use of land. 2. I would like to reiterate that there should be no outdoor speaker system. (Halla Nursery already has one of these that we can hear on warm and breezy days.) 3/6/2006 Page 2 of 3 3. The original (2003) intent of not permitting a commercial kitchen was because the primary use of land was as an executive gocourse. Ron Saatser explained his dream of creating the course so that children, teenagers and families could enjoy the game of golf The clubhouse was simply a place to buy a Coke on a hot day or grab a snack or a sandwich. It was not supposed to be a restaurant with screened porches that served as a business in its own right, encouraging people to stay well after their round had finished. If patrons leave at 11 pm, it is reasonable to believe that employees will be cleaning up and closing around midnight. As neighbors, we find this unacceptable because the new amendments and variances Halla and Kosmas have applied for are not minor changes, but major differences in the way the operation would be run. Neither Halla or Kosmas have approached the neighbors (as Ron Saatser did) to gather our input. 4. I strenuously object to any exterior lighting, except one or two lights fastened to the buildings for safety reasons or a maximum of three safety lights, not to exceed fifteen feet tall, no matter how large the Halla Greens parking lot is. Just as granting the extended business hours in the variance will "be considered an annoyance to the neighbors in the early morning and evening hours contrary to the original use permit," so will these lights be considered an annoyance. Not only will they be a source of light pollution and change our views, but this is in direct violation of the initial agreement in 2003. I am also concerned that if you allow Mr. Halla to add lights, he will push to have longer hours. I believe the city needs to be very firm with Mr. Halla regarding this point or we will end up with a lighted parking lot and the additional lights he has mentioned for his driving range and miniature golf course. This is more in line with the look of an amusement park or a car sales lot in front of our homes, rather than the golf course we envisioned! Again, this smacks more of commercial zoning which is not approved for this area rather than the agricultural zoning which is. John Kosmas has already referred to the use of outdoor lights after dark for the benefit of the patrons of the restaurant and, by remaining on all night, to prevent vandalism. This is unacceptable. This has more to do with property protection than safety. Mr. Halla does not have bright lights on during the night at his Nursery, and this is something I have told him repeatedly how much we and the other neighbors appreciate. I understand having a few lights for safety, but if the golf course opens at dawn and closes at dusk, there should be no need for further lighting. Finally, I am concerned about the current gravel road that borders the golf course. This is the road we neighbors use to access our property. We were told in 2003 that this road would not be used by golf course patrons or for maintenance, yet the orange construction fabric meant to be a buffer between the course and the road was removed so heavy machines could access our road during construction. Once again, Mr. Halla pushed past the boundaries set by the City and the good faith agreement we had in going forward with the creation of the golf course. Since Eric Olson has been in charge, this has improved, however, we still have had to spend money to repair our road several times and I had to fix my car's tie rod when it was impaired due to the road's damage from the golf course equipment. This is the road Mr. Halla's nursery trucks use to reach the ravine for dumping. What is to stop him from dumping the waste from his golf course there as well? Since the Halla tree lot no longer exists, I believe there is no valid reason for Halla trucks to utilize this road any more. It is meant to be an easement for my neighbors and me, not a commercial road. If it is within your jurisdiction, I would like you to agree there should be no use of this gravel easement for any Halla business use whatsoever. (As far as we know, the "current business use" is entirely for access to the golf course and to access the ravine for dumping.) Based on Don Halla's years of disregard for the rules and guidelines from the City of 3/6/2006 Page 3 of 3 Chanhassen, pertaining to the dumping and to the original conditional use permit for the golf course— you may know of others—I am very concerned that he will continue to push the limits in every way Possible. Please examine how Halla Nursery has grown over the years and consider the way the Chanhassen Short Course has grown into the proposed extravagant plan for Halla Greens --complete with a miniature golf course, lighted parking lot (with 104 spaces), more outbuildings (with plans for expansion already mentioned), then use all the resources at your disposal to limit Halla Greens impact on the neighbors and the environment. Thank you. Sincerely, Gaye Guyton 10083 Great Plains Blvd 952-445-1034 3/6/2006 Page 1 of 1 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Jimhautman@aol.com Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 11:04 AM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: halla meeting Attachments: ATT37818.txt Sharmeen, My name is Jim Hautman, I live at 11095 great plains blvd., on the southern border of the halla golf course site. Unfortunately I will be unable to attend the meeting tuesday, and was hoping to voice my opinion by email. I live and work at home and see daily the illegal dumping of trash etc. from Halla nursery[ see photos, obtained legally]. the dump site is just feet away from my property and so the trash evetually washes onto my property. Since the start of the golf course it is now also the golf course dump site. I'm afraid next it will also be a restaurant dump. I know you have tried to stop them and I appreciate that. I just want to reaffirm it's continuing, and if there is anything I can do to help you stop it, let me know. I am also opposed to lights at the course, I was assured by Ron Saatzer when he was involved that it would be daylight hours, no lights. Besides there is already a lighted range a mile away. I am opposed to many other things Halla nursary does, but I feel these two have the biggest negative effect on the neighborhood and the environment. Thanks for your time, I hear only good things about you and your work. Jim Hautman 3/6/2006 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Walstad, David P 1DWALSTAD@amfam.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 11:32 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: Halla Greens Comments for 2/7/06 Planning Commission Mtg Sharmeen, My wife and I live at 10071 Great Plains Blvd, which is directly South of the Halla Greens property. I am out of the state and will not be able to attend the 2/7/06 Planning Commission meeting, so I wanted to email you with some comments, questions and concerns over the Halla Greens proposal. Please include this in the written comments for the Planning Commission meeting. We are very concerned and upset over the requests to expand the proposal far beyond what was originally represented and approved, especially when there have been several incidents where prior approvals, permits, and agreements have been violated or ignored. The new proposal from applicants Don Halla and KK Design dated January 6, 2006 differs drastically from the prior proposals from Ron Saatzer and Herfort Norby Golf Course Architects. Is this the same ownership entity as initially proposed? It seems that there are different principals, different designers, and a vastly different operation plan for this property than what was presented in prior meetings. It's hard to see how this is just a site plan and conditional use "amendment". It seems to be an entirely new operation and proposal from different principals. The January 6, 2006 letter from John Kosmas includes several statements under section 5. Lighting that have absolutely nothing to do with lighting or safety issues, and clearly show intent to develop this land far beyond what was represented or approved. Expansion of Operations: The initial requirement was for no exterior lighting. After earlier reviews, the proposal was amended to "No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety light." Now, according to the applicant, it is necessary to light up the parking lot with 27' towers, light up all of the buildings inside and out throughout the evening hours, add a miniature golf course with lights, add lights to the driving range, stay open from 6:00am to 11:00pm, and stay open year round in order to provide safety lights. This is ridiculous, and clearly designed as either property protection or income generation devices. Exterior Lighting: On the surface, it appears reasonable to have parking lot lighting for personal safety, but Bluff Creek golf course has no parking lot lights. If the hours and seasonal nature of the business are not extended, there is no reason to have lights on all night. If the concern is truly for personal safety, and it's deemed necessary to have parking lot lights, they should be put on timers to shut off after the business is closed. We do not support all night lighting solely for personal property protection. If that is a major concert, the applicant should install an alarm system. Miniature Golf Course: John Kosmas makes the statement (not a request) that "The course currently includes a driving range and in the future a family miniature golf course, both of with require the use of lighting during the evening hours of operation." What miniature golf course? The proposal does not "currently" include this and there is to be no "evening hours of operation". A miniature golf course is not a golf course, and is not considered as such by the City's zoning district codes for permitted, accessory or conditional uses. The City website lists miniature golf courses separately as permitted in zoning districts BH -Highway Business or BG -General Business, and conditional in BF -Fringe Business. None of these apply to this property. We are not located in a business district and do not want to tum this area into one. I don't see where the Planning Commission letter dated 2/7/06 specifically addresses this issue. I would like to see the denial of a miniature golf course on this premises in writing in the document. Year Round Operation, Hours of Business: We strongly oppose year round operation. Operation of what? Hardly to sell a few sandwiches and coffee, as the applicant's proposal states. It is not necessary for a golf course to be open year round. We strongly oppose keeping the driving range open year round and lighting it. There is already a business 1 mile south of this property that provides this service to the general public in a area that is appropriately zoned for it. This golf course attained approval by representing it was seasonal use only, as a sunrise to sunset operation. We strongly oppose any expansion of this for either winter use or from 6:OOam to 11:OOam. Please clarify what "sunrise to sunset" means, as we are concerned over the vagueness of the wording. Sunrise and sunset are exact times of day that vary by day. Does this mean that no public is to be on the golf course after sunset, or that they also have to have left the clubhouse? If sunset is 9:30pm, how long after that are people allowed to sit in the outside veranda's? What about hours for mowing, collecting range balls, and other maintenance? The concern is over noise and lighting. I feel that this should be clarified to the applicant and the neighbors. Lighting the Driving Range: Also listed under the "Lighting" section is "Lighting for the driving range is currently being evaluated and the information should be available shortly." Again, they imply that this is already acceptable and assume they can light the driving range and operate year round. There is no reason to light a driving range that is open from sunrise to sunset. Private Road Usage and Easement Rights : The state highway to the west and county road to the north are addressed, but not the private road to the south. This golf course has been under construction for 2 years, and the applicant's have been using the private gravel road that boards the south side of this property on a regular basis during the construction time. This is not part of the Halla Greens property. The people with properties on this road (including myself) have easement rights. I believe this road is on property owned by Tom & Kathleen Gertz and Dave Teich. I would like to clarify in writing first, that there is to be no public access to the golf course via this road, and second, whether the golf course entity has any legal easement rights to use this road for construction or maintenance purposes. Doesn't the golf course entity have to have easement rights to use this road? This is the same road that MN DOT refers to in it's letter dated November 23, 2005, in which they say "If Halla Greens is using the gravel access road, they must apply for a Mn/DOT access permit." Have they applied for a permit? The wear and tear on this gravel road increases dramatically with heavy truck usage, especially in the spring and fall when ground moisture is high. Water Runoff Onto Neighboring Properties: The applicant has added an elevated dirt berm on the south side of the property that abuts the private gravel road. There is no ditch between the birm and the road, and so with this design, water runs off from the birm directly onto the gravel road surface. This was done late in 2005, and my concern is that this will lead to an increase in water on the road surface which results in potholes and increased maintenance costs. This should be corrected, as there shouldn't be additional runoff directed onto the road. Landscaping: The prior proposal included minimum standards and the applicant's proposal for trees and shrubs along the south and east sides of the property (Page 10, Chanhassen Short Course Staff Report, September 2, 2003. The newest documents make no reference to this at all. What happened to them? What is the status of the landscaping plan in this area? Site Plan Map: The site map provided is dated August 2003, and does not show the location of the new buildings or changes to the landscape plans. Where are the training shed and ball washing building to be located? We are well aware that there are acceptable conditional uses of this property, and in the past, we had supported the golf course development as the prior applicant was willing to listen to the neighborhood's concerns and incorporate them into its design. Apparently, this is no longer the case. The tone and content of the applicant's January 6, 2006 proposal makes it clear that they have no concerns over the neighborhood impact or for city zoning and usage requirements. We realize the city and the commissions hear complaints from neighbors on most zoning issues, but we feel strongly that this proposal goes far beyond reasonable use of this property and is detrimental to the neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration. Dave & Judy Walstad 10071 Great Plains Blvd Chanhassen, MN Page 1 of 1 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: thomas anderson [andersonthomase@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 3:12 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: Halla Greens Sharmeen, My name is Tom Anderson. I live in Lake Riley Woods behind David Gatto's house. I am very concerned with the proposed changes that are being added to the conditional use permit for Hala Greens. The change that alarms me the most is the addition of the parking lot lights. The back of my house faces Pioneer Trail and already we have seen dramatic increases in traffic. Parking lot lights across the road would light up the inside of my house and I would have no say in when they went on and off. Please take this into condideration when you are discussing the additions. It seems to me a bit misleading when certain things are agreed upon and then we have to defend ourselves aginst a bunch of additional items. I will be in attendance at this evening's meeting. Sincerely, Tom Anderson Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. 3/6/2006 0 • November 8, 2005 (Updated December 20, 2005 CIN OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED City of Chanhassen DEC 2 0 2005 Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Ptanner 7700 Market Blvd. CHANHASSENPLANNING UEpT P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Halla Greens (Chanhassen Short Course) Pioneer Trail (CSAH 14) and Highway 101 (Great Plains Boulevard) Chanhassen, MN Sharmeen, Based on our conversation earlier I am at this time requesting that the current application submitted to the City of Chanhassen for Halla Greens (Chanhassen Short Course) be tabled and rescheduled for the second meeting in January, 2006. I also understand that this request chanqes the approval period. releasing the city of the 120 day approval limit. Updated documents will be submitted during the third week of December, 2005 Thank you for your help with this project and will be talking to you soon concerning the various topics related to this project. John Kosmas 952-922-3226 ohn(r)kkdesign.biz cc: Don Halla @952-445-6557 (Fax) - HALLA GREENS - CUP / SPR - APPLICATION 1 K K DESIGN 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD. ST.LOIJIS PARK, MN 55416 (952) 922 - 3226 SCANNED Ao Minnesota D^ment of Transportation 0 Metropolitan District Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville MN 55113-3174 November 23, 2005 Ms. Kate Aanenson Community Development Director City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Subject: Halla Greens Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) Review # S 05-103 Southeast quadrant of Trunk Highway (TH) 101 and Pioneer Trail (CSAH 14) Chanhassen/ Carver County TH 101 Mri Control Section # 1009 Dear Ms. Aanenson: The Mn/DOT Metro District has reviewed the -above referenced site plan. The following comments need to be addressed in addition to the comments from our letters dated August 26, 2003, and September 2, 2003 (enclosed). Area Engineer comments: Please provide additional information on the intent of the proposed modifications to the existing gravel driveway, and the use of the existing gravel driveway at the south end of the site plan, off of TH 101. It is not possible to determine from the plans submitted whether the existing gravel driveway has been moved to be located opposite from Halla Nursery Drive, as shown in the 2003 plan. Please provide additional information concerning the location of the gravel driveway. The site plan is not clear on the access point from TH 101. The gravel road appears to have a possible connection to the golf course property. If Halla Greens is using the gravel access road, they must apply for a Mn/DOT access permit. For questions on these points, please call Lynn Clarkowski, Mn/DOT Metro District South Area Engineer, at (651) 634-2103. Right of Way Office comments: We are enclosing a copy of Mn/DOT right of way plat number 10-34 for your information. The developer needs to refer to this plat in site plans and other related drawings, so that Mn/DOT's existing right of way is accurately identified and labeled. The site plan submitted to Mn/DOT appears to show the Mn/DOT right of way as it existed prior to the construction of State Project SP # 1009-14. Mn/DOT's right of way is now one hundred twenty (120) feet wide along TH 101 for a distance. There is also a "sight comer" that has been taken by Mn/DOT via condemnation on the southeast comer of TH 101 and CSAH 14. In addition, please depict Mn/DOT access control with appropriate symbolization. For questions on these points, please call Lee Williams, Mn/DOT Metro District Right of Way Office, at (651) 582-1275 An equal opportunity employer 0 0 Water Resources Engineering comments: A Mn/DOT drainage permit shall be required. A grading plan depicting the correct right- of-way lines is needed. The City or project developer will need to submit before/after hydraulic computations for the 100 year rainfall event verifying that all existing drainage patterns and systems affecting Mn/DOT right of way will be perpetuated. In addition, please submit information documenting the performance of the pond located at the northeast comer of the golf course. Drainage runoff rates to Mn/DOT right of way for the proposed condition must not increase over the existing condition, and drainage patterns must not change. For questions on these points, please call Bryce Fossand, at Mn/DOT Metro District Water Resources Engineering, at (651) 634-2408. Traffic Engineering comments: A Right Tum Lane, on Pioneer Trail, for the new access, should be constructed. This is especially important with the traffic signal at TH 101/Pioneer Trail. For questions on these points, please call Lars hnpola, Mn/DOT Metro District Traffic Engineering, at (651) 634-2379. Design comments: ■ For liability reasons, steps should betaken to insure that errant golf balls do not enter the TH 101 right of way, or the TH 101 driving/tuming lanes. For questions on these points, please call Ken Ljung, Mn/DOT Metro District Design Office at (651) 634-2113. Permits comments: • The berm has been constructed on Mn/DOT right-of-way and needs to be removed. Mn/DOT has had major drainage problems (flooding) on TH 101 due to this berm. A drainage permit is required. Any use of or work within or affecting Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/tecM/utility. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. County State Aid Highway (CSAR comments: As a reminder, CSAH 14 is a County State Aid Highway (CSAR) Route. Any work on a CSAH route must meet State Aid rules and policies. btto://www.dot.state.mn.us/stateaid/ shows or has links to the applicable forms and the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual. ➢ Refer to the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual, Chapter 5-892.200 for information regarding standards and policies. ➢ Please go to bft://www.revisor.Igg.state.nm.ustarule/882 for information regarding State Aid Operations Rules Chapter 8820. ➢ For driveway standards, the designer is directed to refer to the Mn/DOT Road Design Manual (English) Table 5-3.04A and Figure 5-3.04A for guidance and policies. Please contact Jim Deeny in our State Aid section at (651) 582-1389 with any additional questions. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Review Coordinator Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's 30 -day review and response process to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 651-582-1462. Sincerely, 4MX�,- lf�X 14�� Mary McNeff Transportation Planner Enclosures — Mn/DOT right of way plat No. 10-34 Mn/DOT letter dated August 26, 2003 Mn/DOT letter dated September 2, 2003 cc: John Freemyer, Carver County Surveyor Roger Gustafson, Carver County Engineer Kevin Norby, Herfort Norby Golf Course Architects, Eden Prairie, MN 0 * Minnesota Department of Transportation T , Metropolitan Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 August 26, 2003 Sharmeen Al-Jaff Planning Department, City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Chanhassen Short Course, Mn/DOT Review #S03-039 SE Quad of TH 101 and Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, Carver Co. Control Section 1009 The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above referenced site plan. Please address the following issues before any further development: As you may be aware, Mn/DOT has an intersection improvement project at TH 101 and Pioneer Trail scheduled for October 2004. This project will be acquiring right of way from the southeast quadrant of the intersection, which will affect the proposed golf course. In addition a temporary easement will also be needed from approximately 650 feet east and south of the TH 101 and Pioneer Trail intersection. In addition, sheet 3 of the plan set for the golf course shows proposed landscaping in areas where Mn/DOT will need construction easement. These planting should not be installed until after the intersection reconstruction or they should be moved outside of the area Mn/DOT will need for construction easement. Please contact Geoffrey Prelgo Mn/DOT Design Engineer, at (651) 634-2355 with questions regarding this issue. For liability reasons, the city or developer should install netting along TH 101 at the 8°i hole to prevent golf balls from entering the highway. ■ A Mn/DOT Drainage permit is required. Drainage computations for the pond in the northeast comer of the golf course near hole nine must be submitted to determine the off-site drainage entering the construction project. Please contact Martin Korthank, Water Resources Engineer, at (651) 634-2077 with questions regarding this issue. A Mn/DOT Access permit will be required for the new access onto TH 101. Mn/DOT would also recommend that the golf course have an east -bound right tum -lane off of Pioneer Trail. ■ Any use of or work within Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Two Mn/DOT permits will be required for this development. Please direct questions regarding permit applications to Keith VanWagner (651-582-1443) of Mn/DOT's Permits section. ■ Please send a copy of the final plat for Mn/DOT review to the following address: David Torfm Mn/DOT — Metro West Surveys 2055 N. Lilac Drive Golden Valley, MN 55422 Phone: (763) 797-3113 An equal opportunity employer • 0 As a reminder, Pioneer Trail is County State Aid Route 14. Any work on a CSAR route must meet State Aid rules and policies. Also, the County must review any changes to its County State Aid system so that they stay within its system limitations. Please note that CSAH 14 is Carver County's jurisdiction and the County must have the opportunity to review and comment on the development as well. You may obtain additional information regarding State Aid rules and policies in any of the following ways: ➢ http://w«Nw.dotstate.mn.us/stateaid/ shows or has linl� to the applicable forms and the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual. ➢ Refer to the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual, Chapter 5-892.200 for information regarding standards and policies. ➢ Please go to http:/hvww.revisor.lep.state.mn.us/arule/8820/ for information regarding State Aid Operations Rules Chapter 8820. ➢ For driveway standards, the designer is directed to refer to the Mn/DOT Road Design Manual (English) Table 5-3.04A and Figure 5-3.04A for guidance and policies. Driveway widths, other than those recommended, up to 50 feet will be permitted only by special permission of the Commissioner of Transportation or designee. Please contact Jim Deeny in our State Aid section at (651) 582-1389 with any additional questions. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Paul Czech Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats andIwo (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's review and response to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions concerning this review please feel free to contact me at (651) 582- 1378. rigid Gorn Senior Transportation Planner Copy: Roger Gustafson / Carver County Engineer John Freemyer / Carver County Surveyor Ron Saatzer / Owner Herfort NorbyZolf Course Architects Sathre-Berquist, Inc. Blind Copy: Lars Impola David Torfin Jim Deeny Keith VanWagner Ann Braden Lynn Clarkowski Geoffrey Prelgo Martin Korthank Mn/DOT LGL File — Waconia 0 0 Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 September 2, 2003 Kevin Norby Herfort Norby Golf Course Architects 6452 City West Parkway Eden Prairie, MN 55344 SUBJECT: Chanhassen Short Course, Mn/DOT Review #S03-039 Follow up SE Quad of TH 101 and Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, Carver Co. Control Section 1009 Mn/DOT's initial review of this development indicated that a net should be installed for liability reasons, as stated in our August 26, 2003 letter. Mn/DOT was not requiring this as a stipulation of development but instead more a recommendation After further discussion with the developer Mn/DOT would like to review the site upon completion and make a determination at that point whether a net would be warranted or not. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (651 ) 582-1378. Sincerely, Brigid GomteW Senior Transportation Planner Blind Copy: Mn/DOT Division File— CS 1009 Mn/DOT LGL File - Chanhassen An equal opportunity employer rs I 38��WW:W �UUNy�Y�1U W 8Jp W OK ME «aO��nN�n ON}zaNKU In OOL£SZO'SZ Qs OS09Z0'SZ 4172-,O Ob09Z0'SZ w O J 171 City of Chanhassen Planning Commission P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attn: Sharmeen January 25, 2006 Geneva & Jeff Sorum 9900 Deerbrook Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)403-1190 Dear City of Chanhassen Planning Commission: 9 We are writing in support of the Halla Greens Golf Course expansion proposals set before the Planning Commission. Our property is adjacent to the course and we have been able to see firsthand the results of work that has been completed to date. We are impressed with the work that has already been done and support fiuher expansion plans of the buildings, especially in the case where these plans would further enable the business to be successful. We trust the City Planning Commission, Mr. Halla, and his business partner(s) to further plan with appropriate consideration to the effects of our property, the neighborhood and the city as well. Please keep us up to date where you deem our input to be important. Sincerely, Geneva and Jeff Sorum RECEIVE[ JAN 2 7 2006 CITY OF CHANHASSEN --kk I ;may\ a� Ll � 0 � 1A / � � � Ono �mo � � u wo_ ; UW O a £I ��[ 'irLuii n " 3 � - a iE 4 IS ] S r r a r 7 2 £ _ • ! ry G � I I a � 1 la a_ _• n a_ a a; I �i I a s ]__ S _ • a* 3 3 �• 2 a al -I;aNr %;a1 rr13arr S37ra/ _r ]_ r.171 j s; a 1 � s s• a a s 7;; r 7 NSI; % r : a a. I • li r . : ] a a 7 N' 3 : ; : : ] 7 ] ] ] ] . yII fl la r r r i % Sl a.' 1.2 IS 1 7 a]% 3 a x x a x 1] 3 �" • I' g r a_ ] a / i n n n • IS a 7 a a � _ n r r n � N- �p �; 3 3 7 7 r D 3 E� �s ] i a s _ a a a n n a a c�•�Is�N•a 1 aEa a� a � � ,I• 7 s r x a a_ s.r �N.t S s 11 T a i 7 "�• 1 I �a r: a r , r n nn_ a• a e n a_ a • �s a: 7 a a s A N r r a] - �� i 1 Ir s a: a a a a c a r r• = a ;�== Sap IN`JIS34 'N 'N_ SN33219 VIIVH - i 1dWMNN NIIS11.. 90OZ 9 0 NUr \ IVHNVH33l1 � �\ N9SSVHNtlH�ip,U1� p k v I ®$ C a: li/ l l i S I� � 1 Ell o 10 .o ---- --- I o I 0 I - --------1----- 1 1 ------ -: I I I I 1 , I - I HALLA GREENS """ K. K. DESIGN 3 u� a- a� i ar»•..:.� � .vwwK.ly � w19K Di �i 1 ig��I�m I I W � I I I -sl.p -- ©" ®I I YSn -- �! g i4 I , ® e ® ------------ — - —L1 ____ __----_ I I I - --------1----- 1 1 ------ -: I I I I 1 , I - I HALLA GREENS """ K. K. DESIGN 3 u� a- a� - Wi,Mlea iT'Ml tl33Xpe Sfi. b5 - �rN9Is3ax� NCH SN33a9 VIIVH .-._.._..._.._ _..,_.. ._.,. LJ a i 14 G22§ __..J_, SNS 89 ggVH � § § y ¢ |$ i� |? § liu 'Qy,> s 2\og�H`G' 0) ~ `\ ■ |� I .. LL \ IS k} N'JIS30 'N �,�° SN33210 t/llt/H u 0 L ��:.:a __----------------------------------------------- ___\ _____________________________ 1 1 1 1 \ � �k••R8� •. 1 + n 1 I 1 � i + 1 � 1 I \D 1 I 1 - I ay 1 p it 1 _ __ \ i L — — — bt \\ I IOW `\ \ `•�` 1 SW N •\ \ `\ IW .YCb65iiu n R n 1j . R lY +1 •{. r�t n t't�JS it '1 R-rlsl R lw B1CXi[ SiW i]Y' wµ '631(a Ina LYu.3,Y IYiL'� i•:iiC1.wr4 - . LLWwMi 4)pMix Y9.4 (I �8}Ylt a1 YSr' R 4L R}Y8{ w Yw• 3x}S W3WVJX Hn:a:a L •1 n a1 aY n •l •t ri R e'1 el -R ee ti.='.=tl wnry I It 11 It n Il •n rt 1% '{ 11 rl 1 R •g • n n 9vi.ogotl uyientl s•e• m.uu WOvne wtiv Irvvo3f n a't al 'l "t R R 't •1 n M R R h ea. •w'•ov _ _ _ aw. •e?+••v of vl n "1 K It rt •1 R K nan•gen wmuxnll' � � e�i�' •Z ri 11 R n R •1 ={ '1 R a •1 R''{ R n n n n 1 lot __ I '1 ❑ n •Y n R '1 n 4 •1 •'S n M n n n R n ' +Y It +{ -1'1 '1 n R rt R R •l n n n � n R n i v xw l0 n�•'1�•1 �t1 �'t "1 �l 'n,l-•.Cr R • =1 R R R •\ n n n / wn, 3t.W" 1 I� •1 R IS R`'{ h"t_R' f r i ,i -•'{ r `{ ''1 R R n n 1 •{ wlwm n n n n '1 R =1 1 i r� rt"•'h `t11m • Itr1 n 11 ^Ri •t rl •1 �.;>� TI -t\ 1'1 .+Y -r fy !tr L}' n n n R =1 =t =t '1 '{ i R R n •i n rt rt a n •'1 "'It •'t- r`tY �'l 1 111 1•'1 n n n n It rt •l •'1 R r1 " Y1 R i •1 R •'t R 11 'Y 11 nl •1 II rl •1 n n R 't 4 R n K •I rl 3M1 n •wrw 1.a I n n n n n '1 n R l R rt n •i 'l l 1 R R n n= •'t •' l M1 i 4 r\ n '{ n R x •ur'a 1wY n n •1 n K R R •1 n •l R R It R •t "t n 4 R It rt R •t It "1 ''1 =1 4 n •t n R •1 4 R l\ rl q n —In tvry • n n R n n '1 K r1 •T R R aY °t R R rt q R It R n rl n rt •'t R R •i •t R n n •t al rl •\ 't '1 n IN 11 IL ri r1 It a't n ''t It rt rt 't rt It R R R rt •'t •1 ry 13 R n umv• W -e 6ZHd 9 n n n R R K •'1 n 'l n 't R t q •t n a' t 't rl n 't 't '' "t •t •'i n n R R R n R n n n n 'Y ''t n n M1 LY R •t r '' r at R R n "'1 R n W-O"Zud It n R n n R n n •t 1 R rt rt t rt ri 1'S = t rt rl It 'R It It rt rl 't K n n n 11 -3 n 1 R R R n 11 =1 R n It R r t i 4 aM1 R r t at r{ at R R R R •1 R R 11 n n K •Y R R •t rt n n •'i R R It n R R •t R R R R n R r{ R R n a'i K R al Is It •'1 n n n n n n n It •t R R rl R at 11 It R n R It ''l rl =1 n R R R It R n =t Tl R G R R n n n •1 R '{ '1 R W30 ONINNVW N366VHNVHp •t •1 •{ 't R 11 rt 1-1 n n R n ri R n It n •l 11 rt R n n n n R n n It rt rt n n n n rl R rt +1 It n n K n n n 90OZ 9n 0 NVI' •'t It •'1 "1 n •1,, rl •l r ri rl rl R n { Y 7 •'{ R a l \ •1 q rl a { n n R n- n n n •1 n It �'t n .'l R rt a rt R a n n n R n a n n n It n 03A13p3tl Nl66bHNVMp n r1 Y1 It n rl It 't R a{ n n R R n •1 •1 n n at R n n n n n n n n R n n n n •1 jp,ly�p , n R n n n K R n n '1 % 11 R R •t "1 rl • rt rt n n n n It n It R 11 R R n R R R n R R R It m It n n It R R n It R n R n R n n n -A n n R It R =t R rl vl rl t •1 •1 n n n n It R% n 't R I R '1 R 't 11 11 '1 'l R It R 11 13 11 n '1 1 R rl K R '1 R n n n R It !'1 '{ =1 1 R rl •'1 rl n R !'1 n R It n n It R R n n '7 n R n n n R '1 11 11 It n n n R n n n R n n IN R n R R n n n R 'Y •t R rt I l R n n n n R n R n R n n •f n n It n K It n n R R n R n n n It n n n n n n It •{ rt n Y t Y •t s1 •1 rl It 0 9 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on January 26, 2006, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me thiO day o '2006. Notary Pu G � Kardn J. En lh dt, De ty Clerk g KIM T. MEUWISSEN s„ - Notary Public -Minnesota y,y��-� MRIISSIOII EXpIl9^J 6c,eu Eo Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, February 7, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for a Site Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Proposal: Permit Amendment and Variances for the construction of a golf course - HALLA GREENS PlanningFile: 05-39 Applicant: John Kosmas Property Southeast corner of the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard Location: (Highway 101) and Pioneer Trail Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the W What Happens Wthe public hearing through the following steps: at Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff at 952-227-1134 Questions & or e-mail sal*aff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to Comments: submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online at http://206.10.76.6tweblink7 the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as apart of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be Included In the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, February 7, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for a Site Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Proposal: Permit Amendment and Varlances for the construction of a golf course - HALLA GREENS Planning File: 05-39 Applicant: John Kosmas Southeast corner of the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard Property (Highway 101) and Pioneer Trail Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead W What Happens Wthe public hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff at 952-227-1134 Questions & or e-mail saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to Comments: submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online at http://206.10.76.6tweblink7 the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Altera Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciallindustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff Is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. r SRE This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map m a compilation of records, inlonnshon and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant Mat the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that Me GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracWng or any other purpose roguing amcung onasurement of distance or direction or precision in the dep bon of geographic features. d errors or discrepancies are found pease correct 952-227.1107. The mecedng disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Suter. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all clans, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and had harmless the City from any and all claim brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arse out of Me users actress or use of data provided. This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a Opn'pilation of records, inforTabon and data located in varus city, county, state and federal offices and Other sources regarding the area sbo . and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant Mat the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this mop are error tree, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting rreasureirent of distance or direction or precision in the defection of geographic features. H emirs or discrepancies are found pease contact 952.227-1107. The Preceding clisclalmer is p.ded pursuant 10 Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this nap acknowledges that tfa City shall not be liable for any danages, and expressly waives all dams, and agrees to defend, indemnify. and had harniess the City from any ar all dans brought by User, its anployeas or agents. or third parties which arse out of the users access or use of data provided. 0 DONALD E HALLA & SANDRA J CWAYNA HALLA 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA MN 55318-9465 GAYE LYNN GUYTON 10083 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA MN 55318-9466 MAGDY A & JUNE L EBRAHIM 521 PINEVIEW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8697 THOMAS J & KATHLEEN R GERTZ 10001 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA MN 55318-9466 JAMES M HAUTMAN & DOROTHY D HAUTMAN 10095 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA MN 55318-9466 RICHARD S & KATHERINE S ASPLIN 541 PINEVIEW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8697 CARVER COUNTY ROGER A & KIMBERLY A LEE CARVER COUNTY GOVT CTR -ADMIN 600 96TH ST W 600 4TH ST E CHASKA MN 55318-2102 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8601 ANDREW T RIEGERT 620 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8601 JAMES D & JANET M DINGEL 9351 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8685 ROBERT W SCHOEWE 9611 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8689 BOYD S PETERSON 9860 PIONEER CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8696 VIVEK KAUL & SHERYL R EBERT 9875 DELPHINIUM LN CHASKA MN 55318-1176 SHAWN S & NICOLA S SMITH 725 BRAMBLE DR CHASKA MN 55318 - ROBERT FUGUE & KIMBERLY L HEIN-FUGLIE 9370 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8684 DAVID J & SHARON K GATTO 9631 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8689 JOHN & ANNA MAE MAKELA 9860 RASPBERRY HL CHASKA MN 55318-1180 KEN K HOLMBERG & NANCY J ROSSBERG 9885 RASPBERRY HL CHASKA MN 55318-1180 0 DAVID P & JUDY M WALSTAD 10071 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA MN 55318-9466 DAVID R TEICH 1217 MONROE ST S SHAKOPEE MN 55379-2062 ROGER G NOVOTNY 560 PINEVIEW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8697 ROBERT & CHRISTIN E BOECKER 610 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8601 WENDELL & JACQUELINE SCHOTT 9350 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8684 THOMAS E & BRENDA L ANDERSON 9371 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8685 WILLIAM GRATZ 9851 PIONEER CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8696 MICHAEL ROBERT NELSON 9870 PIONEER CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8696 JEFFREY B & CAROL G SORUM 9900 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8551 GERALD F & NANCY G SLOCUM GERALD R JR & SHELLY D COOK WILLIAM J MCNEELY & 9920 DEERBROOK DR 9920 DELPHINIUM LN MITRA BAHARI MCNEELY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8551 CHASKA MN 55318-1177 CHANHASSEN HASSE MN 55 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8551 171 STEPHEN M & NICOLE DRAGOS JEFFREY R & BARBARA C MICHELL 9960 DEERBROOK DR 9961 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8551 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8552 11 Public Hea*ng Notification Ar#a (500 feet) Halla Greens (aka Chanhassen Short Course) Site Plan Amendment Planning Case No. 05-39 495 Pioneer Trail City of Chanhassen ,4) mow,. SUBJECT SITE Planning Commission Summary — February 7, 2006 construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. Temporary street signs shall be installed at each street intersection when construction of new roadways allows passage by vehicles. Pursuant to 2000 Minnesota State Fire Code Section 501.4 g. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. 18. Approval of this site plan is contingent upon approval of the final plat for Gateway North. 19. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement. 20. The building shall comply with the Planned Unit Development building setback requirements." All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: HALLA GREENS (AKA CHANHASSEN SHORT COURSE): REQUEST FOR A SITE PLAINS BOULEVARD (HIGHWAY 101) AND PIONEER TRAIL. APPLICANT: JOHN KOSMAS — PLANNING CASE NO. 05-39: Public Present: Name Address John Kosmas Don Halla Sandy Halla Erik Olson Dennis & Nancy Mills Tom Jessen Tom Anderson Elizabeth Smith Mikkelsen David & Sharon Gatto Steve McMeen Kathy Asplin Magdy & June Ebrahim Tom Gertz Gaye Guyton Judy Walstad KKE Design, 6112 Excelsior Blvd., St. Louis Park 6601 Mohawk Trail, Edina 6601 Mohawk Trail, Edina 9855 Delphinium Lane 9510 Foxford Road 9570 Foxford Road 9371 Foxford Road 9591 Foxford Road 9631 Foxford Road 9391 Foxford Road 541 Pineview Court 521 Pineview Court 10001 Great Plains Blvd. 10083 Great Plains Blvd. 10071 Great Plains Blvd. Planning Commission Summary — February 7, 2006 Sharmeen Al-Jaff presented the staff report on this item. Commissioner Keefe asked for clarification on the light standards in the parking lot, berming, and landscaping. Commissioners Undestad and Larson asked for further clarification on the berming and landscaping. Commissioner Zorn asked for clarification on the gravel road adjacent to this site. Commissioner Papke asked if the ordinance speaks to the possibility of looking at a different type of lighting standard, concern over the size of the maintenance building, hours of the operation, and future lighting of the driving range. Chairman McDonald asked for further clarification of the lighting request and the nature of the application. John Kosmas, representing the applicant addressed the changes being proposed compared to what was previously approved and outlined their application. Commissioner Keefe asked the applicant to elaborate on their lighting request. Commissioner Undestad asked the applicant to comment on the hours of operation. Commissioner Larson asked about the possibility of the applicant requesting a liquor license. Commissioner Papke asked about the long term use on the property. Chairman McDonald asked how this operation would compare with the Chaska Short Course and clarification of building materials. He then opened the public hearing. Boyd Peterson, 9860 Pioneer Circle, the residence directly to the east on the proposed second fairway, expressed concern with the hours of operation, noise, and buffering. David Gatto, 9631 Foxford Road, speaking on behalf of the 37 homeowners in the Lake Riley Woods Homeowners Association stated that the association really encourages the development but did have a few concerns such as when the operation is scheduled to open and completion of the bike trail connection. He requested a copy of the hydro geologic study regarding the impact to the surrounding wells that's referenced on page 5 of 18, condition number 13. He noted concern over the increased intensity of development, the fact that the Bluff Creek Golf Course does not have parking lot lights and that the homeowners association agrees with the City on the denial of the extended hours, and that increased traffic, lighting, noise, and disruptions after dark are going to impair their property values. In summary, they do not agree with the staff recommendation that the City Council approve the amendments to the conditional use permit for parking lot lights and drive aisle lighting. Judy Walstad, 10071 Great Plains Boulevard which is on the south side of the golf course directly behind the private road and directly behind the driving range expressed concern with the noise from lawn mowing, year round use of the property, opposition to lighting of a driving range in the future, and parking lot lighting. In summary noting a request to clarify in writing, so there are no misunderstandings between the applicant and the neighbors, a map site with all the building locations, explanation of the continued landscaping process, definition of sunrise and sunset, when golf patrons are expected to leave the property, including the club house, that the private road not be used for Halla Green purposes, and denial of the miniature golf course and lights on the driving range. Gaye Guyton, 10083 Great Plains Boulevard stated four things of most concerned were that the hours of operation were going to be seasonal and from sunrise to sunset, not prior and later. There was going to be no outdoor speaker system, no commercial kitchen, and no exterior lighting with the exception of safety lights on the building. Also a concern that the applicant has not adhered to the conditions previously placed on the development. Tom Gertz, 10001 Great Plains Boulevard stated he didn't have any qualms that a majority of the proposal falls within the current ordinances and guidelines but noted that consideration should be given to the fact that this development is taking place in a residential neighborhood. He expressed concern with buffering and drainage. Tom Jessen, 9570 Foxford Road, part of the Lake Riley Woods Homeowners. His primary issue was 12 Planning Commission Summary — February 7, 2006 traffic safety and the intersection which is the main entrance to the golf course. Chairman McDonald closed the public hearing. After commission discussion the following motion was made. Papke moved, Zorn seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve an amendment to Conditional Use Permit #2003-4 CUP, Planning Case 05-39 for the construction of a golf course with a club house as shown in plans dated received January 6, 2006, with the following amendment to condition 9 of the existing conditional use permit and the addition of condition 10: 9. No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety lights which includes parking lot lights and drive aisle lights. The height of the light pole may not exceed 4 feet. All light fixtures must meet ordinance requirements. 10. Mowing and customer traffic outside of the allowed hours of operation which is sunrise to sunset is prohibited. Papke and Zorn voted in favor, Undestad, Keefe, McDonald and Larson voted in opposition. The motion failed with a vote of 2 to 4. Papke moved, Zorn seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve an amendment to Site Plan Review #2003-7 SPR, Planning Case 05-39 for the construction of a club house, a maintenance building, a golf ball washing building and a lean-to for a golf course as shown in plans dated received January 6, 2006, with the following added conditions: 1. Applicant shall increase landscape plantings to meet minimum requirements for parking lot trees. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the City prior to City Council approval. 2. Applicant shall fully screen parking lots from adjacent roadways through the use of berming or increased landscaping. 3. The applicant must submit detailed architectural plans for the maintenance building, golf ball washing building and lean-to that meet the design ordinance requirement. 4. Comply with all conditions of the MnDot review letter dated November 23, 2005. 5. The temporary 120 square foot octagon building is permitted for a maximum of 12 months from the day the City Council approves this application, or when the certificate of occupancy for the club house has been issued, whichever comes first. 6. The applicant is responsible for obtaining and complying with MnDot and Carver County permits and approval on any grading that takes place along the north and west side of the property. 13 Planning Commission Summary —February 7, 2006 7. All disturbed areas are required to be restored with seed and mulch within two weeks of grading completion. 8. All plans must be signed by a professional civil engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Papke and Zorn voted in favor, Undestad, Keefe, McDonald and Larson voted in opposition. The motion failed with a vote of 2 to 4. Papke moved, Zorn seconded that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council denies Variance, Planning Case 05-39 for metal to be used as the exterior material of the maintenance and golf ball washing buildings, and denies the variance allowing the golf course to be open from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., based upon the findings in the staff report and the following: I. The applicant has not demonstrated a hardship. 2. The property owner has reasonable use of the property. Papke and Zorn voted in favor, Undestad, Keefe, McDonald and Larson voted in opposition. The motion failed with a vote of 2 to 4. There was confusion with the outcome of the vote. The applicant, John Kosmas, asked to poll the Planning Commission. Chairman McDonald clarified that what the Commission voted against and denied was the motions, which means what is left is the current conditional use permit so the applicant's request to expand his current conditional use permit is denied. APPROVAL OF NUNUTES: Zorn noted the verbatim and summary minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated January 3, 2006 as presented. Acting Chairman McDonald adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 11:45 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim/Kim Meuwissen 14 Os -moi Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 19. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement. 20. The building shall comply with the Planned Unit Development building setback requirements." All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. PLAN AMENDMENT (2003-07). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT (2003-04) AND VARIANCES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A GOLF COURSE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF GREAT PLAINS BOULEVARD (HIGHWAY 101) AND PIONEER TRAIL APPLICANT• JOHN KOSMAS — PLANNING CASE NO. 05-39: Public Present: Name Address John Kosmas Don Halla Sandy Halla Erik Olson Dennis & Nancy Mills Tom Jessen Tom Anderson Elizabeth Smith Mikkelsen David & Sharon Gatto Steve McMeen Kathy Asplin Magdy & June Ebrahim Tom Gertz Gaye Guyton Judy Walstad KKE Design, 6112 Excelsior Blvd., St. Louis Park 6601 Mohawk Trail, Edina 6601 Mohawk Trail, Edina 9855 Delphinium Lane 9510 Foxford Road 9570 Foxford Road 9371 Foxford Road 9591 Foxford Road 9631 Foxford Road 9391 Foxford Road 541 Pineview Court 521 Pineview Court 10001 Great Plains Blvd. 10083 Great Plains Blvd. 10071 Great Plains Blvd. Sharmeen AI-Jaff presented the staff report on this item. McDonald: Okay. Dan? Keefe: Let me start with the lighting. How many light standards are we talking about in the parking lot, do we know? How many light standards? I presume they are on poles and would be cast downward, correct? Al -Jaffa Correct. If you tum to the last page of your staff report... 91 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 Keefe: Is it just the six? Oh, there's over here, too and along the road. Al-Jaff: Correct. There will be three fixtures, now these are the double, -headed ones, the shoebox. There are two fixtures along the driveway and then there is another fixture lighting the way into the storage building. Keefe: Can you orient me just a little bit on what I'm looking at here? Is Pioneer Trail to the top of the page and then 101 is on the left side? Al-Jaff: Way on the left. If you would look at this...here is Highway 101, here is Pioneer, this is the parking lot right here and the light fixtures will be right here. Keefe: So the property line to the east is approximately how far from that parking lot? AI-Jaff: 388 feet. Keefe: And the topography of the land, do we have berms or do we have golf course topography? Often golf courses have some topography to them. A]-Jaff: There isn't substantial topography. Keefe: Okay. So to the east we are not seeing any. How about then to the south? Is there more to the south? A]-Jaff: There is a substantial distance to the south. Again, these are the questions related to the lighting fixtures? Keefe: Yes, more to the lighting and I'm just concerned, I'm particularly thinking of the surrounding neighborhoods and kind of what they would see when the lights are on and if limiting the hours of operation to sunrise to sunset, if we agree to that, would the lighting be allowed beyond that? After that, is there a requirement to tum them off or how would that...? A]-Jaff: We could make it a requirement of the conditional use permit that they be motion lights if they are for safety reasons. That would definitely be an option so they would be turned off but if there was movement in the area then... Keefe: ... they would come on. ...to know that that's lighting for safety reasons. I don't have any problem with that. The question is, are we going to have a beacon of lights sitting out there when nobody's there or, that really... Al-Jaff: It has to meet ordinance requirements which is the downcast, shielded and not-to- exceed'/2-foot candle. Based upon the photometrics that we have received, they meet that requirement. Keefe: It's one thing of the light casting out rather than sort of looking at it and seeing if we can require just the motion after dark. as •,ccA" 42 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 Al-Jaff: That's definitely a requirement. Keefe: So to the east we probably have a view. To the south it's a much greater distance. AI-Jaff: It's a substantial distance. And there is landscaping on this side. Keefe: And north is... Al-Jaff: North, we have a 50 -foot setback from the edge of the parking lot and then you have the right-of-way for Pioneer Trail, which I believe is 80 feet. Fauske: The plan shows 73, but they may not be current. Al-Jaff: 73? So 73 plus 50, over 120. Keefe: Do they have beaming along the north in this plan? A]-Jaff: There is some berming but it's not 15 feet. It will not be 15 feet. Keefe: Any landscaping? A]-Jaff: There is landscaping proposed around the entire site. Keefe: I'm just trying to get a feel for the site as we look at it. Thanks. McDonald: Mark? Undestad: While you're on the lighting. The parking lot, there's some berming on therefor these cars that should be out of there at sunset and the employees or whatever that might be around there as they are coming and going, are the headlights going to be shooting off on everybody or is that bermed up enough on Pioneer Trail, all these stalls that face the north? Al-Jaff: There will be berming along Pioneer Trail. There will also be some landscaping along that area. Undestad: Nothing will shine up onto Pioneer Trail or over the hill into the neighborhood? Al-Jaff: No. McDonald: Debbie? Larson: So we're dropping the lights 10 feet from what they proposed? A]-Jaff: That's what staff is recommending. May I go back to this? What I will do is just focus on this area here. This plan proposes a berm and the berm is approximately 10 feet at the highest 43 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 point and it gradually goes down. Here is the parking lot immediately behind it. You will also notice that there is landscaping along the entire perimeter of the site. There are no changes proposed to the landscaping plan. There are no changes proposed to the grading plan either. (male voice)???: Is that berm in now? Al-Jaff: No. Larson: So the trees are going to be immature for many years yet? Al-Jaff: They have to meet ordinance, 2-1/2 inch caliper but yes, to answer your question, the answer is yes. Larson: Is there any possibility that it could be set to where they would have to put in a fuller - type tree like an evergreen versus a deciduous tree? Just for the sake of the headlights, the shielding of the lights. AI-Jaff: I don't believe that with the berm here you will have an issue with the headlights. That will be a substantial berm out here. Larson: Okay. That's all I have. McDonald: Debbie? Zorn: I'm sure this will come out in some of the public comments but out of the emails that you shared with us, there seems to be this gravel road that I know it's not part of this. Canyou just make a comment on that? AI-Jaff: Absolutely. This is Highway 101. This is the curve in Highway 101. I'm sureyou're all familiar with it. There is a private street that continues back here. The nursery uses this private street. This is a private street. There are private agreements. The City cannot get involved in enforcing who uses this private street. I have explained that to the neighbors and explained that because it's a private street governed by private agreements, we can't get involved. Zorn: Okay. Thanks. McDonald: Kurt? Papke: Is there anything in City Code or ordinance that would prevent us from looking at a different kind of lighting design? I've been in parking lots that have been very tastefully lit with very low lighting posts, four feet or less tall, where it provides you with sufficient light to get to your car without tripping and falling and fording the lock to put your key in and so on. Would there be anything that would prevent the applicant from taking that kind of approach here? Planning Commission Meeting— February 7, 2006 Al-Jaff: I think that they could definitely work with the neighbors. Obviously, this is a great desire the neighbors that they... Papke: But from a City Code perspective is there anything that would prevent that kind of design? Would that go against any of our rules, regulations, guidelines, anything of that sort so the applicant has complete freedom to design something that would be much less intrusive into the surrounding area. Al-Jaff: As long as the fixtures are shielded, they are fine. Papke: Okay. Are there any issues with the increase in the size of the maintenance building? This is four times the size it was before. Al-Jaff: That is something that we talked about in house at length. The materials used to maintain the golf course would be stored in that building. There is no size limit in our ordinance. Papke: Okay. There is mention in the applicant text concerning eventual application for lighting of the driving range, if I read this correctly. What we're approving tonight, would that in any way impact, allow, deny, whatever. is there any consideration to be taken for that aspect of the... Ai-Jaff: The only lights that you are approving are the ones that are in the parking lot and then you have two along the driveway, and then the other two. Papke: Okay. If the applicant were to desire to light the driving range, would they come back to the Planning Commission again or what is the process. Al-Jaff: Yes, especially knowing the nature of the situation and how we want to be sensitive to the neighborhood. Papke: Okay. This is more of a rhetorical question. Is there any consideration taken in City Code or guidelines for lighting in this situation that take into account the ambient lighting conditions in the area? Let me explain myself a little bit. We looked at things, for instance, when the movie theatre in downtown Chanhassen wanted to put a few uplights on the movie theatre. In that case, those sorts of things seem reasonably harmless just because it's in a well - lighted area. There are tons of lights surrounding those structures. This particular application is in an extremely dark area. There are almost no street lights. You can see the lights from the casino at night, it's so dark. Am I correct in assuming there is no allowance in City Code for light pollution in an area like this? Al-Jaff: The way light pollution is addressed in the City Code is requiring the fixtures to be shielded, downcast, not to exceed %z -foot candle. Papke: So your answer is that there is no consideration for surrounding conditions? AI-Jaff: Correct. 45 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 Papke: Okay. How about winter hours? Is there any consideration in this application for year round use? I'm particularly concerned about the driving range. This application is starting to look more and more like the setup down at the base of 101 and 212 where you have a driving range and a golf course and it's lit up at night and yadda, yadda, yadda. Al-Jaff: The hours of operation are sunrise to sunset. This application will be different than what you see down along 212 and 101. They are two different applications. There are specific requirements and things that are permitted on property that abuts Highway 212 or Highway 5 that is not permitted along Highway 101. Miniature golf is not permitted on this site. Papke: Was there mention of miniature golf in the application? Al-Jaff: There was some talk about at some point in the future. There were numerous requests with this application. Papke: So there are no limits to winter hours? Al-Jaff: Sunrise to sunset. Papke: Sunrise to sunset. The only concern I have there is if the lights are on at night and you have snow on the ground, it reflects off the snow so you are going to get more of an issue during the winter as we all know than you do during the summer. I'm assuming then that with a driving range there would be a desire to use that driving range during the hours of operation when there's snow on the ground, yes? Al-Jaff: Yes. Papke: Okay. McDonald: I've got a few questions for you, too. You addressed the one about driving range. On the lights, you say that they have to be shaded so that they downcast. I take it what you're talking about is all around the light would be opaque, I believe, so it's focused down. AI-Jaff: Like a shoebox. Correct. McDonald: On the north side, and again I'm not worried about the east or the west or the south, on the north side there at the property line which is roughly 120,130 -something feet from maybe the light poles or something, that's going to be 1 foot candle? Is that what the ordinance... AI-Jaff: That's going to be less than half a foot candle. McDonald: And we know this why? AI-Jaff: Because they submitted the photometrics and we will hold them to these photometrics. ER Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 McDonald: Now what's the difference between a 15 -foot pole and a 25 -foot pole? What does that do? Al-Jaff: When you bring the light fixture down, two things will happen. The area that's illuminated becomes less so we know that as you get closer to the exterior property lines, your foot candle is substantially less. Also, if you live across the street and you look out, chances are you will be able to see a 25 -foot tall pole a lot easier than a 15 -foot pole. McDonald: And by going to the 15 -foot with the 10 -foot berming, that would help the situation to the north now where I'm talking about where you've got roughly a 10 -foot berm at that north... Al-Jaff: The reason why we chose the 15 -foot is we believe it's a human scale, if you will, a human -scale light fixture. So it's the height of the street lights that we have in downtown versus the shoeboxes that you see along public streets and highways at times. McDonald: Are these going to be halogen lights, or the gas plasma lights, or incandescent lights, or fluorescent lights? What kind of lights are we talking about? Al-Jaff: The City Code, I need to look at it. There is a specific type of light fixture that the applicant would have to use. We have a City Code that governs the type of light fixtures. Bob, if you would kindly ... If there is another question, maybe we can answer it. McDonald: Okay. The other thing that I've got is you state in the report that we are sunrise to sunset and seem pretty much in agreement on that. That's not what I read in the report. The applicant is wanting things, what I read, until 11:00 p.m. at night. Al-Jaff: And staff is recommending denial of that. McDonald: Okay, but what's coming out is there doesn't seem to be a lot of agreement here in some of these areas. I hear the applicant talking about halogen lights. You're saying that there's a City Ordinance requirement that is probably not halogen, it's probably something with a... Generous: Pressure sodium. McDonald: Okay, that's not that much better. So, in some of the points that have been brought up, I guess what my question is how solid is this plan that you're bringing before us because it sounds as though there's still a lot of unknowns here as to what we're looking at. Al-Jaff: The applicant has provided us with a list of amendments. We are recommending that, we believe that what we have before us, what we are recommending approval of, is in compliance with ordinance requirements. Everything else such as landscaping, grading has to comply with the original plan that was approved back in 2003. McDonald: Okay. So for the most part, this is the original plan with certain amendments which are increasing sizes, bringing in the lighting, and those types of things. 47 Planning Commission Meeting —February 7, 2006 Al-Jaff: Increasing size, extending hours of operation, illuminating additional area. McDonald: Okay. Down a road as additional things are added to this, they will have to come back through the Planning Commission again to get approval. Al-Jaff: Correct. McDonald: Okay. That's all the questions I bave at this point. Is the applicant available to present his case? John Kosmas: My name is John Kosmas. I'm representing Halla Greens. I have an architectural office in St. Louis Park. We were sort of latecomers in the project. This project had been before you well before we were involved two or three years ago. We've basically gotten involved to take a look at the previous request that was approved and then to see how that fits with the current needs and some evaluation that has taken place over the last couple of years. The process of getting this building put together has been taking a bit of time. There's a lot of work that has been going in, a lot of hard work. The people have gone in to develop that site and get that into the condition that it is right now and in doing so, also gave them time to look at, okay, how do things fit together in what we see today. We have a very good project. We'd like to enhance that project with the changes that we're requesting. I'll take them kind of in a one by one. The original building size, what was determined was that that needed some enhancement. Just having outdoor spaces, we live in Minnesota, our favorite bird doesn't always want to be around us so we wanted to enclose some portraits, so that was developed. The look of the building was reevaluated. There was an architectural office, Anderson & Associates, who would take a look at it, and the Halla's took a look at the building saying, we'd like something a little nicer. All of a sudden that starts changing the characteristics of the building, the characteristics of the grounds around it, and the requirements that I gave you. Beyond the club house, then the amenities of the other buildings. If you are going to have a driving range, you need a facility that cleans and washes the balls and where you bucket them, I'll use that terminology, where you distribute them, where you handle that process. That should be adjacent to the club house. Unfortunately, that wasn't one of the things that was included in the building. Then the evaluation of the means of maintaining this property that's development. Now you start counting up number of mowers, the number of types of mowers that you need and the vehicles that you needs, and we started placing those inside of a building, all of a sudden we realized, okay, that building has to be bigger if we're going to put everything inside. For the longevity of the equipment and proper maintenance of that equipment, it is better if it's inside. We had the discussion with Sharmeen about putting it outside, build fencing and screening around it. But you're not doing that equipment any good having to go through the rains and such like that. So you look at that as say, okay, let's increase the size of that building. So we got to the building, the various buildings that were involved, and the little teaching shed that's off on the course that Sharmeen noted as a place for when it's inclement weather but you can still do some teaching so that the golf pro that can be helping that person doing the work on the driving range, they're in a shelter. That's the function of that building. It's often referred to as a loafing shed as far as it is concerned when you have horses so it's the same type of structure as that three -sided, open-end, sloped roof, so that when the swing takes place you're not hitting anything as far as the structure 48 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 is concerned. So all of those were kind of looked at. We put it together. Basically the site plan is identical, as Sharmeen was saying. Nothing's really changed. A little massaging here and there to accommodate these different buildings, placing them basically staying in the same spot. The elevations of the building are the same. All of that is still the same. All of the basic grading. There is undulation a bit to all directions from the club house. The club house is sitting up at 916 which is basically a little bit taller than the rest of the site is happening around it. That drops off as you go down to the parking lot and go to the point. That grade drops down approximately six to seven feet. You have an elevation back at the north end of that parking that's at an elevation number 910. The road, Pioneer Trail, is an elevation of 914 so this issue of headlights going right onto the highway, they're basically going into the ground. The cars are not perched in an upward direction while they're doing that. They're actually in a downward slope. Everything is draining in that north direction and then off to the west. All of that was taken into consideration. I'm going to walk through a little bit on the, let's take this section. I'm going to have you do the same thing that Sharmeen had you do. The buildings that we're talking about and the orientation as we talked about, Pioneer Trail is on the north side of the property and hopefully I'll put all of these drawings down so north is always up. We have the club house building, the maintenance building, the accessory building (we're calling it a ball washing building), and the teaching building. That's the physical buildings that are on the property to the south. The course is basically laid out and some of you have probably seen it before as far as the first tee, then picking up second, third, fourth, cutting back to the fifth, crossing over six, seven, eight and nine. It's a nine -hole course. There is some variation of grade that occurs in through here. We're all aware of how 101 drops down so that grade down at the lower corner down in there is considerably lower than the course itself so there is some undulation that is occurring there. The plantings that occur all the way around and through, all of you know that this was basically a nursery, a little growing space that was almost like a little tree farm I'll call it, that was functioning. What they've done is they've basically taken out the trees that are necessary. for the course, leaving the other ones all in place. We talked about buffering around into this whole side of the property is quite heavily done. This is probably, the north side is probably the most open side and that's the side that will have some plantings and such reestablished in that area. They enlarged some berms that occurred over on this side. There is a break in a berm that happens here to allow water infiltration and then there's a slight berm that's happening over in there and, like I said, there are some new plantings that are happening along the south property line. I'll probably have you come back just a little, let's stay in the parking lot. That seems to be a focus tonight. Let's take care of lighting and I'll fill that in a bit. I did say that we were recommending metal halide rather than sodium. My recommendation for that is they get better coverage and more efficient use of lesser lamps and I figured the fewer number of lamps and I figure the fewer number of lamps starts to help with the idea of less intrusion on my eyes. We've tried to do it with a smaller number a bit taller than what's being requested by staff and again, that gives me better coverage so that I don't have the issues of having lights sitting right next to the roadway. I tried purposely not to put any in over here. You have to on the driveway. That's an automatic. You have to do something to identify this from a safety standpoint. I do not want cars pulling in and out of here if it's perfectly pitch black. Now, the ordinance reads half a foot candle. Along this property line, and I know it's very difficult to read the photometrics, the numbers along that property line are basically running 0 to 0.2 all the way across. This comer, right in through here, is where pick up into that O.S. Normally, if I were laying the site out, I would have actually made that about a 1.5 to 2 at an intersection because I 49 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 like that intersection a little brighter but to comply with the ordinance, we've kept it at the 0.5. So you have the 0.5 that's in this area and all of this like I said is either 0 or below. All of the plantings that are here, both the trees and wildflowers and such that are going to go on that berm, will all be there during the summer season. They will not be there in the winter season except for the trees themselves so there will be a little different type of character. But with the berm that's there, which unfortunately there was a grading plan that was developed that did say ten feet there, but there is no way physically to get ten feet of earth change between what the elevation of the highway is and the elevation of the property. We're not going to build a straight up and down retaining wall and put the earth sloping right back down onto the highway or something like that. Basically, it's going to be a four -foot grade change that occurs that does take care of the, so when I talk about headlights in that area, they're basically being taken care of by the berm that's there and the highway that's there. In relationship to how the light then traverses from vehicles through here, it's basically taken care of by the berm and by the plantings. The lighting from, this is my style of a shoebox, that pole with its lights are basically directing the light downward. Now if I take and just pretend it's sitting way over here off to the left, that light that's coming is basically like I said where this property line runs through here, is zero. There is no light coming from that fixture any place past the property line. I'll correct myself. I said zero but it could be 0.2. That is very minimal, it's virtually zero. I even thought about bringing a photometric reader and turning the lights off and leaving something on in the room so you could see what that actually is. It is virtually darkness. You'll get more ambient light coming from around you, houses or whatever else coming from at you when you measure that kind of a light level. The fixtures are shoebox as it's referred to in the trade. It's basically a box that sits like that. The lamp is typically a horizontal lamp because of the shallowness of the fixture, rather than a vertical lamp and the lens is very minimal. It think it's about a half-inch projection below the actual box itself. So it's a downward casting fixture. Its not intended to spread. Many times you'll see parking lot lights that are sitting like that and shining outward but that is not what we're are proposing. We are proposing that they stay in a downward position because we're not trying to light the road. We're not trying to light the neighbors, we're trying to light the parking lot in a nice, safe manner for people when they come and go. So to address that issue of hours of operation, however we handle that, basically what we recommend is the use of a solar time clock so that that time clock keeps up with what type of day we're having and it changes it. It automatically makes a change on that basis. Something that's going to be motion, it takes too long for a reaction, especially in either one, the use of a halogen or metal halide, or the use of a sodium. They all take a certain amount of time to cook before they actually are a lamp so you don't want those cycling on and off in that manner. So the lights will be kept downward. They'll stay away from the neighborhood. The lighting that is being proposed as we were talking about is basically two along the drive and those are 15 -foot poles. Those are a different scale because we're only trying to light a pod of area in that manner. We're not trying to light all the way down into the course and we're not trying to light back on the road. These we do recommend staying at the 25 -foot elevation because again, going back to the question, it allows me to put less in. It's like the question do I put more lower ones in or do I put less with a reasonable height to them. We're not asking for 30 and 40 -foot which you find sometimes in shopping centers. We're talking about staying in that 25 -foot zone. It gives good coverage. It takes care of the areas that we're talking about. We get some wash out of those and we give people lighting to go by. That lighting is basically there for both customers and employees. Not to shied the customer, but I'm more concerned about the employee coming and 50 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 going because that employee has to be able to come safely before the customers come and leave safely after the customers are through so it's more of a matter of taking care of their needs more than the customers' needs. That leads me to the question of hours of operation. We have sunrise/sunset. 'That's when we start playing golf, and that's when we finish playing golf but if I'm working in the golf course, I'm going there before that and I've got to do things to get ready for the golfer and I have to do things to close after the golfer's been there. So when we start talking about these hours, it's like if you're going to be there for golf at 6:00, at sunrise, I should have -been there by 5:00. I should have started mowing green one at that time, have green one clean and ready. Be on green two or three before that fust person tees off. There's a difference in what I consider the operational hours for a customer, and the operational hours for taking care of the facility itself In reverse, the same thing at closing. If I'm coming in at 9:30 or 10:00, as the sun sets in the long hours of the summer, I'm going to then be having to clean up and close after you come in and have a coke or a cup of coffee and a sandwich or whatever until maybe 10, 10:30, 11:00 so I'm going to be leaving at 11:00. So that's our request for looking at the hours actually getting talked about hours. I'd like to see the ordinance; I would have loved to be involved in writing your ordinance. I was listening to your earlier about your differences in ordinances and the car and a half for three bedrooms and such like that. We only had the opportunity once to get involved in writing an ordinance as a user of an ordinance, and it was great because it ended up in my opinion, of course. It worked because it worked for what we saw everybody needing. I would have loved to been involved in writing this one. I understand the sunnse/sunset for the operational hours of the customer, but it has to be different for how you actually run the business. The business has to be earlier, and has to run later and therefore you've got to light it before and after. They'll be off all day and they won't be sitting there burning from 10:00 until 4:00-5:00 in the morning, they'll be off and hopefully everybody's sleeping at that time that's in the neighborhood so it really doesn't make any difference if they are on or off, but they will be off at those kinds of times which appropriately should be. The other lighting that does have to take place is again we have to take customers and clients or golfers back in the balance of the part of the site and so they'll be coming, this is our handicap accessibility and even though we don't see a lot of handicapped golfers, that facility has to still meet those requirements and it will. It does. The driving range at this time is not lit and we have not proposed it to be lit purposely until we see what happens. You have a different facility as I referred to down at the bottom of the hill at 212 and 169 than what we're talking about here. The primary function for this one is the golf and also practicing during the day. It can't run during the winter because the only way you can run, we've done some other winter driving ranges as the one that is down the hill as a net system so they can catch the balls. Those balls come back in through a trough and retrieval system. You can do that in the winter because you're sitting above the snow. In this case we're not proposing anything like that. It's not that type of facility. It's more like you would see like the other golf courses in the area, some of the traditional ones, the Hazeltines, and the Minnekandas and the Interlachens type of thing. They are seasonal. They don't have ball catchers and continuing on through the winter. I'm trying to think if we covered all of those ... we got time, the hours, we got the lighting, the building sizes. What I'd like to do on the building size just to help maybe have you understand that. It looks like we've got a fair amount of room in this building but this is that maintenance building. It gets too light. I'm sorry. I could have darkened it. But basically, the maintenance building has a small office, a little break room for employees, bathroom facilities, a small little storage area that's separated the whole parts department because you have maintain your equipment, and the rest of it then is 51 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 basically vehicle parking and a maintenance area, a little shop area. It's basically there to bring the equipment inside, bring the mowers inside, bring carts inside because there will be carts available for the course. In doing that, then the building gets to be a little bit larger, it gets a little different scale, a different type of building and the economics, and it is partially economics that drive the color, a dark green, evergreen, and a cream color. We'll call it that. At least on my screen that I'm looking at up here turns out to be a little less green. A very moderate, reasonably priced building and efficient building utilizing the same type of building that was proposed before, being a Lester -type building type of facility and I guess I'm one that pushes a little harder as I look around the neighborhood. The property to the east of the golf course has a two -toned brown Lester -type building. I'm going to use their terminology for that. So it felt like it was compatible with that. Looking across to the northwest corner of the property off the corner, there's one, two, three, I think five maintenance -type buildings, Lester -type buildings. There's even one that's a Quonset hut, which is more of a ribbed metal type of a look. In this particular case, we're talking about it being a building that has metal panels that has sort of a board and batten look to them so it's not corrugated. It's not like what we thought up when we were doing typical metal buildings where we had the corrugated metal that we'd screw onto the frame. So, we're looking at it being something that's acceptable in the neighborhood. It becomes sort of a dual question. We're back to codes again. If I were a farm, I could have them. If I had a farm and a residence not any larger than our club house building, it's only a 4,000 square -foot type building. We draw homes that are that large and I have my horse barn. I don't know exactly what the people of the northwest that are across from that other kitty comer do, but there is four buildings on the one parcel and at least two or three on the other, and I think even to the south of us there's a couple of buildings. The metal building, because it's so far off the property and because it seems to be in keeping with the neighborhood, we feel that's an appropriate use. If it were a commercial use, which we're not rezoned as a commercial, we are maintained as an A2 Agricultural property, allowing us to have a golf course on it, it would be a different matter. But it doesn't change zoning. We stay as an ag zoning so therefore I think the ag applications should be applied to the property in its fullest. So therefore the property, the building would actually stay as a metal building rather than changing the materials itself. And that's true for the other two buildings. As Sharmeen indicated, we have changed the appearance to the building. I'm not giving you all of the, I didn't tone at all because it's a fair amount to do, but the building that you saw in that colored photo before was basically almost the same lean-to type of building. We're not proposing that. This is a hand, stick -frame building, and trussed roof adding some character to it. Accentuating entries is what is really what you want to have happen in your neighborhoods. It's residential scale. It's potentially, well I don't know how I would judge it. There are homes that I saw when I drove through the neighborhood to the north that I think are larger scale than this one, different style. We're looking at it more for a little different use than we are trying to put ... but it's basically we're using the same material that Sharmeen was showing you before. The asphalt shingles. The question as to what these materials are. This is a trim material. There's bead board that will occur in part of the entrance. This is a product that's called Azack(?). It's a trim plastic. It sounds cheaper when I use that term. It's a much more elaborate trim than that. It's a permanent material. It doesn't deteriorate. It doesn't fail. It accepts paint. We're basically looking at using the white trim with our siding and these are the trim boards that go around the windows and such like that. 'there will be residential double - hung windows. They're actually what's called a cottage style where the top half portion is smaller than the lower portion so it's being kept in that nice scale of a residence. The use of, in 52 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 this case we ended up developing the clear story glass up on the top, a dormer type of a treatment, to again let some light in from a different direction and add a different character to the building. Currently there are the two screen porches that are on the end. There has been some discussion and it is the same thing relating to if we change the approach. We're going to actually build those screen porches where the foundation is insulated so that if there is a need and a good rationale in the future we may be talking to you again about enclosing one of those so that they can enhance their facility. What did I miss? I'll shut up. You can turn me off. I'll answer questions. McDonald: Okay. I have a question for you. We do have a time limit now. We're obviously not going to make the time limit. Can we run these meetings over or are we... Generous: It's up to the Commission. McDonald: Okay. That's all I wanted to check on, At that point, does anyone, Commissioners, who wants to start asking questions? Go with Kurt. Dan? Keefe: Let me ask you a question. In regards to the, let me get back to the hours of operation and the lighting, if we were to run that to sunrise to sunset, what would that do to the lighting that you're proposing? John Kosmas: It would stay the same. Keefe: It would stay the same even though... John Kosmas: I've got to have the lights on for you to come early to your tee time and I've got to have the lights on for you to leave and I've got to leave the lights on for the employees. Even though, even if you were to say sunset is the theoretical closing time, people are still on the golf course. They're going to come in, they're going to finish, and the employees have to stay and take care of them. That's why I kind of question the use of that, in the ordinance. If I were running a golf course, that's what I'd have to do. Keefe: Now in regards to lighting itself, you reference a couple of golf courses, Minnekanda and Interlachen, where they utilize in their entrances much lower lighting than what you're proposing. John Kosmas: Not that... Keefe: No, but in terms of height? John Kosmas: Minnekanda has their pole lights coming in on their main drive that are up there. Keefe: Yeah, but Interlachen has their... John Kosmas: Interlachen has it's globes. F11 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 Keefe: Yeah, right. You could do that if they're lower. John Kosmas: And I could do that efficiently in the driveway because the driveway, just like the... Keefe: They're not 15 feet high. John Kosmas: They're probably 12 to 15 and they're also greater than 360 -degree lamps. Now they let light, they're typical, old street -light fashion and they emit light in all directions. You get a great deal different efficiency out of a lamp that's doing that and in many cases it's more efficient for the lighting, but it's potentially more objectionable to the viewer. So your use by the ordinance to ask for it to be a shoebox, I think from the standpoint of those that are driving by and going by, I think it's more compatible. But you have to get them up to get them to light. Otherwise, you're putting them at every 15 -foot interval type of thing and that gets to be a lot of lamps. Keefe: What would be, so if we were to go with more lamps, what would be the conceivable minimum height that you could go at? John Kosmas: I don't know where I would put them except for putting them out on the north side of the parking lot and I don't recommend that because then I'm taking and putting more light to an area where I don't want light so I've got to keep the lights where they are. Keefe: What height would you be looking at? John Kosmas: I'd probably work at 20, I'd work with a 20 -foot high and I'd tip them up to make them cover better. If I start bringing them down to 15 and squaring them up, you're going to probably be putting them at every third parking stall. That's 27 -foot spacing. That's a lot. We have nine stalls to park now, so it's much more effective and actually I think softer when you get to the property line. The ambient light that's going off to the sides like I said is virtually zero. McDonald: Okay. Mark? Undestad: I just have a question on your hours of operation. You want to start at sunrise and have your employees come in an hour, an hour and a half, two hours, who knows how early they are going to come. John Kosmas: A reasonable time to come in. Undestad: But I think most golf courses now, aren't they going to first tee times of 7:00 am. rather than the 6:00 a.m. and not having all that? Again, how you can show all that and then you've got residents around there, the trucks come in, the employees come in, the equipment starts rattling. In the summertime people like to sleep with their windows open. I'm seeing more of these that are now, the first tee time is People try to get out there before the club house opens up, but I think 7:00 am. to me is... 54 Planning Commission Meeting – February 7, 2006 John Kosmas: I'm not a golfer all the time. I'm a hacker. I don't get up early to go play golf. You won't see me be the sun riser. But I understand that, what I've learned and understood, that sunrise is the starting time and many people are willing to do that, partly sometimes to get that early tee time to get through this course in an hour, hour and a half, and they're at work at regular times almost. So it doesn't interfere with anybody's day. Undestad: I kind of see that more with golf courses out in the farms yet. They're still, every time you want to get up, come on out and play but I think the things that are, the courses that are in around the cities and things are starting to move that back. John Kosmas: I don't know. I don't have an answer for that because I'm not familiar with it in that respect. Undestad: It minimizes all that early morning noise out there. John Kosmas: The mowers that we're talking about, they're not huge tractors. The mower that works on a green is almost like a hover because it's not trying to maximize what it's throwing around. It doesn't have to be powerful, it's maintaining. That's the mowing that takes place early. The course can be done safely during the day because they'll be in cages but you can't mow while I'm playing golf or while you're playing golf. So you've got to start that before the people get there and sort of stay ahead of them and that's the purpose for that. Undestad: Other than just the sheer numbers, is there any reason why you wouldn't set up your hours with first tee times? John Kosmas: I'll do it as in economics. If I say you can't start playing golf, let's say I lose four tete times in the morning and I do that enough times during the year and we did a little math, I think if we lost, there were four tee times that you would cut off—let me just check my notes because we did do it. The question did come up. If you had three foursomes, because you're basically starting them at that 15-20 minute cycle so you cut off an hour of starting time, you'd lose 12 golfers in the morning. If you did it in the evening and you said okay, because we've got to be gone I've got to take off four starting times. I've got to cut it off a half hour, 45 minutes early. Take away another 12. You have 24 golfers that you've lost in that day and if each golfer intended to spend his green fees of $15 and you do that over the period of days that you're open, it's a $60,000 swing. That's $60,000. It helps take care of everything that you're doing on that course. That's a big number. If I could put it in my pocket, l wouldn't probably be here. So it's a big number when you start saying, let's change that half-hour, 45 minutes. It does make a big difference in the operation. I'm not saying, of course, it's an ideal condition. It's every day. And there's days when you don't even play golf because it's raining so that will throw out those days. Just taking them on that average, that's what makes a difference so it is an important factor for us to try and look at that hour of golfers starting at sunrise and employees starting before that. That's how I guess I would have worded, if I'd rewritten the ordinance. Undestad: Just out of curiosity, how many total golfers do you plan on running through in a day? 55 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 John Kosmas: If you say you can do, oh what would be a good number, a foursome every eight minutes? If you're really on pace, you can do a foursome in eight minutes so if you're open and You really have that many people out there, it's a lot of people. And that's part of the reason for having them start earlier and doing some of the maintenance and cutting those greens because You've got to stay ahead of them. You can't do that while you're open. That type of thing you can't. You can't be on that green. Larson: Okay. Just one quick question. You may or may not know the answer to this. Are they planning on applying for a liquor license? John Kosmas: They're looking for a beer license. Larson: Okay. The reason I ask that is then, the course is open sunrise to sunset. Then you're talking people, they have to be off the course by sunset or do they off they premises by sunset? John Kosmas: I think that's a very good question. Larson: Because if they're going to go and finish up and go have a beer that puts them an hour later maybe? John Kosmas: I think they should be able to do that. Undestad: I think the reason for the sunrise/sunset is the lighting issue. If you don't want the lighting issues then you need to close the place down. Larson: Right. That's what I mean. It puts your lights later. Your lighting issues are later. John Kosmas: I happen to think I should be able to that. I think I should be able to play a good round of golf and I should be able to stop and have a sandwich and a beer or a sandwich and a pop and then leave. But if I go to the literal interpretation, and that's what I guess I've got to ask you to do, is look at that interpretation a little differently, because if I look at the literal interpretation, if sunset that day is at 8:30 it's closed. And there's a lot of light potentially after what we count as sunset. We talked about the sunset on the calendar, on the time clock as one thing, but actual sun's gone is anywhere from 45 minutes to an hour past... Larson: Lake zoning ordinances, like jet skis and small things, have to be off half and hour or an hour, whatever it is, before sunset. I should know that one. So that's what I mean. That might be something that needs to be discussed. That's all I have. John Kosmas: Like I said, I'd have loved to been in writing that ordinance because I would have written it... McDonald: Debbie? Zorn: I'm going to let Kurt go first. W1 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 Papke: What's the designed lifetime of the buildings? How long are you designing these to last? John Kosmas: The club house building? Papke: Yes. John Kosmas: As long as you're residence. It's a long-term building. Papke: Okay. We're also the planning and zoning commission so we do have to take zoning considerations into issue here. So staff, this area is guided Waal residential in 2020? Generous: Large lot. Papke: Large lot. So 2020 comes along and gets rezoned, what happens? John Kosmas: We stay there. Al-Jaff: The applicant needs to make a decision, do they want to continue the golf course use or do they want to change it to a residential use? Papke: But there's nothing that requires them to then stop operation of the golf course? AI-Jaff: It's a conditional use. There is a higher and better use with residential. Papke: But they can continue to operate this golf course until the year 2100, as long as the building doesn't fall over. Al-Jaff: Unless they violate the conditions of.. John Kosmas: My understanding is that you have some interim uses in your ordinances and I think that thought of an interim use would be applied but in this case its not an interim use. Al-Jaff: It's a conditional use. John Kosmas: It's a conditional use under the ag zoning. Papke: So coming back to, I think this issue of hours of operation is going to be crucial here from a city code perspective. In this case, taking into account somebody sitting at the bar having a beer and somebody mowing the greens. What constitutes hours of operation according to our city code? Al-Jaff: Sunrise to sunset. Papke: But what operations, what things can take place during that time period? After sunset... Generous: They cannot maintain. 57 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 Papke: They cannot maintain. That's the way it's currently written? Al-Jaff: Correct. Papke: Do we enforce this? AI-Jaff: We haven't had a problem yet. I've never had a complaint. Papke: I'll make one now. AI-Jaff: Okay. Papke: On Bluff Creek. AI-Jaff: Done. McDonald: Okay. Debbie? Zom: I want to hold my comments or my questions so that we can have the public hearing. Thanks. McDonald: Okay. I have got some questions for you. You talk about economics. Have you compared this course to the Chaska course the way it's run and operated? To me they're comparable. John Kosmas: My understanding is they have, are aware of how the Chaska course operates. McDonald: Do you know what the hours of operation are for that course? John Kosmas: No, I'd have to defer to that. The Chaska course? McDonald: No, the Chaska short course. It's over by Hazeltine. We didn't talk to the par 30 course but we talked to the town course and we're basically running the same as the town course. McDonald: You want to come in early and do the mowing and everything, but how can you do the mowing without light? John Kosmas: The lighting that you need for the level of lighting you need for the greens is strictly on the mower itself. There's no need for broad headlights or beacons of light to do that. McDonald: Okay. You've run through the economic numbers of what it takes to make it work and all such as that but one of the factors I think you need to put into that is that you're in a neighborhood, a residential neighborhood. That's why a lot of people are here today and you're W _.i Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 going to see a lot of pressure coming from us as far as the use of this course. I understand you have to make a profit. I understand you've done your numbers and you know what it's going to take to go through it but the problem that we're going to hold you up to that's a scrutiny that we're looking at on this is you've got to live within that neighborhood and we just don't want a lot of complaints. That's one of the things that we look at. The whole thing about the liquor license and those things. If you come back before us with that, you'll have a hard time getting that through, I'll tell you right now. I guess the reason I say all that is that we do look at this in the context of where it's at and my question is have you looked at that? There's a lot of complaints here. I've got a stack of emails. I've been getting calls constantly about this and what it comes down to is maybe it's a lack of cooperation or listening to your neighbors. The 25 to 15 -foot, it seems to me as though it's a small trade off but it would buy you a lot of good capital. What have you looked at as far as talking to the people within the neighborhoods. Have you held meetings with them? John Kosmas: No, we have not. It was a discussion to do that but there is also the understanding that it has been in front of you before and the neighbors were involved before and so we are basically working with that. McDonald: Okay. I guess the feeling that everybody has while you're back is these seem to be some rather drastic changes. This is not the deal everybody signed up for is kind of the feeling I'm getting from reading through all of this. I understand the issue about the lights but why wouldn't 15 -foot light poles work? John Kosmas: I'm not saying they don't work. I'm not saying that they do not work. They do not work in the configuration we have them set up right now and if 15 -foot is the number that you work with, we're going to have to have more lamps than what we're talking about with the six we're talking about. I don't recommend that. That's where I'm at with it. It doesn't make sense for the use of the property to put more of them around and start moving the lamps closer to someone who doesn't want them. I don't want to put them in your backyard. That's not the purpose. The purpose is to keep them away from you. McDonald: Does part of this come down to the resolution of what does sunrise to sunset mean? John Kosmas: It is some of that, yes. And the safety of the employee leaving and/or coming. I don't want to send an employee out there in any business. I work at a nice little strip center in St. Louis Park and I really like it when that light's on over that door and lighting up that alley when I walk out the back door to go get in my car and I'm not small guy but I feel much better. When that thing's out, I let the landlord know. McDonald: I don't think any of us are saying anything about safety. We all agree with that. think the question comes down to how much lighting do we actually need to achieve that objective. The other question I've got concerns the building materials. Staff seems to have made a point about the ribbed metal. What I heard you talking about, I'm not sure that that's what you're talking about. Is there a difference of opinion there between you and staff or has something changed? 59 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 John Kosmas: I think it's a play on words. The metal building that we're talking about is a metal building that has a simulation of a standing seam and a board and batten type of look where it has a flat panel, a strip, a flat panel, not a corrugate, what I would call a corrugated... so I think it's just a matter of terminology. McDonald: Because when I think of ribbed, as you said, I think of corrugated but that wasn't what you presented. Okay. I have no further questions and I don't mean to be overbearing about all of this but it's just one of these things. There area lot of questions about this coming back that it does appear things have changed from what we initially approved. John Kosmas: Hopefully I've made it obvious that it isn't that drastic of a change what we've done. It's more a clarification of what, I'm not picking on the people that were here before you before, but I think some of it should have been taken care before but I'm willing to carry the message afterwards now to try and get the answers squared away. Because I want these people to live with what's there. I like the building that we're developing. I think it's a good use. Therefore, let's bring it back and let's talk about it. McDonald: Okay. Let's see what everybody has to say and then we'll go from there. John Kosmas: Thank you. McDonald: Thank you. At this point we will open up the public meeting and what I would ask is that you step up to the podium, state your name and address and then address your comments to the Commission and we will try to get everyone in. Yes, sir. Boyd Peterson: Good evening. I'm Boyd Peterson. I live at 9860 Pioneer Circle. I'm the residence directly on the east side of it which puts me right on the second fairway. I'm the fellow with the big brown pole barn that was built in 1985. At that point in time there were farm fields, three nurseries, this and that. There wasn't these fancy buildings that we can do that with so I need to point that out. Other thing is these hours of operation. When those sprinklers go off, my house is probably, you know, 200 feet away. You would not believe how loud those sprinklers are when they're going off and they nm them things unbelievably a lot. As far as lawn mowing, them lawn mowers run a lot and they start damn early in the morning and they seem like they are mowing all the time. Now that's a lot and it's right there. Another problem with, I mean I don't want to make any enemies with the applicant, but it may too late for a lot of that. I've been there since 1987. But the big problem I have and I was hoping there was a little bit of a buffer between my property and the second fairway and the original design of this course was great and happy and everybody that's here was really great and happy about this going. It was a real tame nine -hole course for the public and for the kids, older folks that can only go do nine and be done and a quick deal. I don't think there's anybody here really too stupid to see what's going on here. This is a master plan for bigger things. It's ridiculous. I was hoping for a little more of a buffer. I want to get back to that. I mean the applicant, he's well aware of what I was hoping for and well aware of what was on the original docket. As a matter of fact, I even took care of trees that were planted by myself. I drug 400 feet of hose around for months just so they could take care of the rest of the course. They had enough problems. I wanted this thing to work. Now, what I got is, they're mowing right up to the line fence and what happened to my 40 5Si7 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 yards of weeds? What happened to my buffer? It's not there. I've got a dog. Okay, well keep your dog off of my course. Well, okay but what happened to my three, four feet of weeds for my dog wouldn't see a golfer running across. My dog don't see nobody over there, my dog ain't going to go there. I got four kids. My big concern is where my pole barn is. It's real close to the second tee box and I know damn well this is going to happen because there's a lot of golfers that have a few before they start their round. What's real convenient, and you're all welcome to come over to my place and look around all you want, the back side of my pole bam's a perfect place to walk over and relieve yourself. And I know that's going to happen and that's why I was hoping for a buffer. You're not going to walk through 30 yards of weeds with hopefully thistles. What it's supposed to be isn't happening and I don't want to make enemies with the applicant. That ain't what I'm trying to do. The applicant's well aware of all I really wanted. I got one pole barn with one light and you're all welcome to cover over after this meeting and see what one light does. That's all you need. I got kids running around all the time. I got cars coming and going. Why do you need all these lights. I could talk all night. It's obvious I'm a little frustrated on how it's gone at this point and nobody comes and asks me what would be nice. I thought that was all worked out but it isn't what's happening. I'll let other folks get up. Thank YOU. McDonald: Okay. I have a question for him. Sir, quick question for you. Do you have any concerns with golf balls hitting your pole barn? Boyd Peterson: I'm not a golfer, plain and simple. In talking to golfers and the original guy that was putting this all together, designed this so the balls are all drove nice effectively away from my property. I guess unless you put a pretty heavy hook on and there's been people say that's going to happen so there are going to be balls coming at my house and I'm hoping the first window that gets broke that the golf course takes care of it and puts in one that won't break again for when the next one hits. That was kind of a, in a sense, a verbal thing that was worked out just being a nice neighbor about stuff. I've got beautiful pines that have been there forever that are up there that I'm hoping they'll take care of a lot of that. I took care of a bunch of trees and I'm hoping they'll take care of that, too. I hope that answers your question. McDonald: Thank you. Next, please. David Gatto: Good evening, folks. I'm David Gatto. I live at 9631 Foxford Road. I'm going to represent the entire Lake Riley Woods Homeowners Association. Several members of the board are present tonight. In fact, the President is right there. I've been authorized by the board to speak on the behalf of all 37 families that live across the street and to the north of the golf course. I'll invite any other members of the association that are here tonight and present that do not agree with any of my comments to come forward or speak up and correct me. I want to say first that the association really encourages the development. I'm sorry, I'm going to kind of read this because I prepared these comments and I shared them with some other people and they listened so I've got some things to say but I'm going to read most of it. We encourage the development of the golf course and wish its management a great success with this current business model and as presented and approved in September of 2003. I know that myself and 61 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 several of the residents are eager to use the facility. We've been encouraged by it's positive visual impact. We feel the landscaping that has been completed is an improvement from even the beautiful nursery that was present there before. We know we could have something across the street that's far more detrimental and not as pleasant to view as a golf course so we don't want the Halla's to misconstrue our comments tonight in any way. We have a generally positive impression of the development and look forward to its completion and opening. Our first question to Halla's is when is this thing going to open? One of our concerns is this is going to become a white elephant and never open and that will be an embarrassment to Halla and the neighborhood out there. We want to plant that first question. So we understand it, the Planning Commission now has the discretion in approving or denying the site plan and is limited to whether or not the project complies with zoning ordinances. When we review the September 15`h conditional use permit, we want to acknowledge for the record again, the applicant did accept that City awarded them the permit with no exterior lighting except a safety light on the building, as we understood. Let's talk about safety for a minute, guys. Sharon and Kathy, would You stand up? This is the example of the kind of people that are out in our neighborhood after dark and before sunrise. These two ladies and several other ladies that are nearly identical to these ladies get up before the sun rises and walks around our neighborhood. Walks right down the street. Right down the bike path. Some of them walk entirely around Lake Riley and to my knowledge; we have not had any problems with safety. Now unless that some other kind of folks are brought into the neighborhood by this business, we don't think that there's going to be any Problem with safety and we frankly don't understand all these needs and all this talk about protective of employees before the sun rises and after the sun sets over there, because we think that we've been pretty lucky with what we've got. We've got the following comments. We've got another question. The conditional use permit states the applicant is going to provide a Pedestrian bikeway connection to the City's trail system at the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Pioneer Trail. We want to know, Mr. Chairman, when Halla's going to complete that connection. So far we haven't seen any evidence that they've even begun that. Then also, we want a copy, the Lake Riley Woods Homeowners Association needs a copy of the hydro geologic study that's regarding the impact to the surrounding wells that's referenced on page 5 of 18, condition number 13. I want to comment for the record tonight more about this watering and the irrigation system. I personally observed the watering and specifically during the month of September when we received over 10'/: inches of water. I had to go out and get my newspaper one morning with an umbrella because it was raining so hard, and as I glanced over at the nursery, they were pouring out irrigation water onto that (shag field?) during a heavy rainstorm. You know, all of us neighbors have talked a lot and we're really sensitive to our common water supply and our wells out there and really don't see the need to operate a commercial golf course sprinkler system during heavy rain events. We wonder if the golf course has any sensors integral to their system or can be added to their system that will preclude the system from working, especially during a heavy rain. Now I know that I can override my automatic sprinkler system and I do when it rains or when it gets so wet in here and that usually occurs different times in the summer. We just shut the irrigation system off. So we're wondering if the golf course can do the same for us. We also would like to review the Carver County, the letter dated August 29, 2003 and a MnDOT letter dated 8/26/03. We'd like to look at all this prior to the City Council meeting which this matter is going to be under consideration. The reason I say all that is because I've got some comments in their personally and this applicant has shown time and time again their lack of consideration for what is actually permitted. In other words, the City of Chanhassen 62 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 tells them they are permitted to do and they go about their own business and they do things that are not consistent with the permit. So we feel that would be better if we just go ahead and double check it ourselves, too. We now know the reason for the parking lot lighting. It kind of was a mystery to us but it's clear after we read the application items number 5 and 8, and I think everybody's been alluding to this, that this applicant is really trying to have a future driving range with lights, a future miniature golf range with lights, and some sort of future evening operations that revolve something around maybe coffee and a sandwich shop, maybe more. I mean there's no way we can tell. But its really clear that the applicant desires to kind of step up his business model. I mean, he came here and everybody, as everybody's been saying, was really happy in 2003 that we were going to have a executive golf course and we were all going to be able to use it like Mr. Peterson said during the day, and now we're back here and we're talking about massive buildings, different kinds of uses, all kinds of lights in the parking lot for safety reasons, and we can see that the technique here is to come in and ask for more variances on top of the conditional original intent and permit and we flatly don't like it, obviously. So the facility is only needed to operate between sunset and we really wonder why safety lights are needed during the day like everybody's been talking about. I guess Mr. Papke, you must have read my notes before the meeting because you got most of my, you've already talked about most of my ideas. I was going to talk about, and so I'm not even going to waste too much of this, but I was going to talk about the lighting pollution. I mean, these folks talk about lighting that is downblasted and has so many foot candles and so forth at the property line, but we all know that what really in effect happens is I don't care what color, flat black, those lights are going to reflect off we're going to have light pollution. When it snows, if those lights are on, and these guys want to operate in the winter, its going to reflect off the snow and it's really going to be bright. And it is true, we can see the lights from Mystic Lake in the south end of Chanhassen real clearly. And it is true, I can look to the sky in the south, I can look to the sky in the west, not everybody knows this, but all of our neighbors get together a lot of nights and we try to count the number of satellites we can see fly over the City, the skies and its really nice in that part of Chanhassen still and we just don't want to lose it. So, now I do have a, I got a trump card. I can't believe nobody else has said this tonight. I want to make note that the Bluff Creek Golf Course does not have any parking lot lights. I don't know that everybody understands that. I drove over there today because I was curious and that's kind of what I thought. That seems to be a pretty successfully golf course and one that has never kicked anybody off because of sunset and you can get pretty decent tee times in the morning and I've never felt threatened by any kind of safety. You know, I golf all the time folks and these guys talk about going and doing their maintenance before the golfers get there. That would be pretty hi-fi, because I can't remember too many times when I was the first golfer on the course and I didn't have go ahead and put through the moisture and dew on the golf greens, or I didn't have to wait for the guy to mow off the golf green before I was putting on it. There's a lot of us in here in this room that are golfer and we know the way golf courses work. We agree with the City on the denial of the extended hours, the increased traffic, the lighting, the noise, the disruptions after dark are going to impair our property values. I notice your ordinances are full, your ordinances are full of those words, things that impair property values, things that diminish property values, things that impact Property values. That's the kind of thing where somebody's going to come look at our house if we want to sell it I know that some people in my neighborhood have their houses directly from that golf course for sale right now and that individual told me just tonight that he didn't buy his house next to a parking lot and he doesn't this house next to a parking lot, and I'm sure that the 63 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 people that are going to try to buy this house don't want to buy a house that's next to a parking lot. So it's probably pretty obvious that that's going to diminish the value of that property. The maintenance building, I mean, we don't agree with the increased size of this maintenance building. We're trying to figure out why you need a maintenance building that big for a golf course of this size and I don't think that's been clearly demonstrated even though we've seen lots of diagrams here tonight. A 32 -foot by 24 -foot ball washing building is kind of curious also. I have been to a lot golf courses and the ball washing buildings and the buildings that dispense those golf balls, and I'm talking about the Hazeltine golf course, it isn't any bigger than this little space here between all these desks and Hazeltine golf course uses that and I think that's a pretty good golf course. The Deer Run Golf Course over in Victoria has got just that little building that does the same thing so I guess it's not clear to me what 32 to 24 -foot is going to be used for, in addition to 100 -foot long maintenance buildings. It's kind of interesting. These larger buildings and more buildings on this property are certainly going to impact the visual appearance of the property and again potentially impact our property values. We want to agree, a comment that we agreed with the staff recommendation that all the buildings be consistent with the wood exterior, whatever you approve. I mean the steel exterior skin would certainly be something that we're not used seeing. Mr. Peterson's got some metal buildings over there. I live across the street from him. I can't see them. He's got plenty of trees around them, it was built a long time ago, and it's just not going to be out in a new golf course. Finally, let's talk about non-compliance. I've got a specific one for you. The neighbors have noticed that the underground wiring is indeed presently installed for the lighting of the parking lot. Mr. Chairman, some of our neighbors want to know why we were all subjected to very strict compliance and inspections during construction of our homes; however, this applicant has been allowed to install items while they're clearly inconsistent with his present permit. We just don't understand how that happens. Additionally, they've admitted tonight that the permit says that the berm is going to be 10 -foot high on Pioneer Trail and they simply said, aw gosh we can't do that. I guess we don't understand that attitude. I would have had a hard time telling the inspectors that when I built my house that geez the plan said that I can't have that drain box under my garage but I just can't do that. I want a drain box so I'm going to put it there. That's that tough things for us normal people to understand. So I'm going to do a quick summary here that we do not agree to the staff recommendation to the City Council to approve these amendments to the conditional use permit for parking lot lights and drive aisle lighting. We just don't think they need any lighting. I do agree, Mr. Papke, if you really wanted to come to some sort of agreement, the short path lightings, we would talk about those. That's a great idea and we actually had that idea tonight. We were talking about that over pizza before we came up here. We don't feel the applicant has really shown this facility is different from other facilities engaged in the exact same business. In fact, the business that Bluff Creek is in is enhanced. Bluff Creek is the closer of this golf course, and not an executive golf course and so they're in the same business in Chanhassen and actually directly adjacent to the same property we're talking about. We don't see any real comments or valid documentation from the applicant to support that the lighting after dark will in any way provide a safer environment for the public during the period from sunrise to sunset. We do not agree that the applicant should be given the opportunity to put commercial lighting of any type on the property just because the local ordinances provide them for safety. They were permitted to have lights on their building for safety. That's exactly what Bluff Creek has. Bluff Creek has a very standard double fixture on one end of the building. I noticed that was pointing where all the carts were parked on the side of the building as I drove through there today and that's all M Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 there is. So, I'm sure a lot of other people want to talk; I have just spoken for 37 people, so thank you very much. McDonald: Thank you. Anyone else? Judy Walstad: Hi. My name is Judy Walstad. I live at 10071 Great Plains Boulevard. Our property would be on the south side of the golf course directly behind the, we have a private road, and we are directly behind the driving range. Could I just confirm first of all that you did receive an email from Dave Walstad dated February Oh? McDonald: Yes. Judy Walstad: Alright. Thank you. I would just like to say I do have concerns with the lawn mowing. I guess I didn't realize that they started or considering starting that early. I have to say I was shocked about hearing any winter usage because on page 2 of the 18 -page proposal it says operations shall be seasonal and limited to sunrise and sunset. I've always assumed the golf course was summer, luckily in the spring sometimes and in the fall, but I never heard of it for winter usage. I might just add to my neighbors tothenorth that I haven't met yet, but in a comment with the lighting in the parking lot and cars leaving, I think we should consider that headlights on a car, on a vehicle are not on the ground, they are three to four feet off the ground; therefore, you might be getting some of that headlight projected into your properties. Since we live directly across from the driving range, the range actually butts up to our front yard, my first area of concern is regarding the demand for lights on the driving range, and I guess that's going to be discussed in the future but I would just like to state while I have an opportunity that I'm adamantly against lights on the driving range. I would also be opposed to the proposed future miniature golf course and lights involved in those and the parking lot lights. Also, I didn't know about the lights on the maintenance building that would be right in our path of vision. I would not be comfortable with lights on that building. In addition to the lighting, if the concern if truly for personal safety and not for property protection or to generate income, and it's deemed necessary to have parking lot lights, I feel they should be put of timers to shut off after the business is closed. We do not support all night lighting solely for personal property protection. If that's the major concern we feel the applicant should handle that protection with alarm systems. I am vehemently opposed to extended hours 6 to 11 p.m. and being open year round. I feel that this is an operation that occurs in the prime season of the year and they are running from sunrise to sunset, 7 days of the week already and I feel there should be no extension of these two items. This is not zoned as a business district and we don't want it to become one. I would like to mention during the construction of the golf course a berm was placed directly north of our private road. This was not in line with the original plan and we are concerned that this will cause water to drain onto our road causing pot holes and increased maintenance costs. And I do understand the private road was mentioned earlier tonight. That would need to be handled separately. But I would like to say that that berm was not intended to be there and it was not in compliance with the plan that was proposed to us earlier. The drainage was supposed to go into their drainage ponds. I just wanted to mention that and feel that this needs to be addressed Landscaping: I would like to say I am very pleased with the evergreen trees placed directly across from our driveway and I have faith in the manager and crew upon putting those in. I feel that this project though is still in process regarding the south side of the golf course along the 65 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 Private mad. It is hard to know where they are since they did not go by their original proposal again so I would like in writing what they are doing to complete this project. I wanted to mention there is that driving range they talked about earlier that's one mile south of our property and I would like to comment that it is open year round and what is convenient with that property is there are no residents in the area so I think that is fabulous and there's not any conflict there. In closing, the following is a list of things that should be clarified in writing so there are no misunderstandings between the applicant and the neighbors: A map site with all the building locations. I was really kind of surprised to see the map proposed has two buildings. It does not show, I did see it tonight, but it does not show where all four buildings were to be located. Explanation of continued landscaping process. Definition of sunrise and sunset. Again, what golf patrons, when they're expected to leave the property, including the club house. I would like to have in writing that the private road not be used for Halla Green purposes. That again may need to be handled elsewhere. We would like, if this is possible, to have the intentions for the use of the road, if they plan to do so, in writing. I would like to see denial of the miniature golf course and the lights of the driving range to be in writing also. I think that's it and I thank you very much for your time. McDonald: Thank you very much. Would anyone else like to come up? Gaye Guyton: Good evening. My name is Gaye Guyton and I live right behind Judy Walstad, 10083 Great Plains Boulevard. First of all, I know this evening has gotten so late and you all look so tired so thank you for staying and listening. I'm very concerned about this, and I was one of those optimistic people who was here telling you we were really in favor and excited about this golf course. In 2003 I spoke in favor of it. Ron Saatzer was really good at coming to visit with us neighbors and just running things by and making sure we were all on the same page and we've seen that change. The initial things that you approved in 2003, some of you were here and some were different, were the four things that we're most concerned with. The hours of operation were going to be seasonal and again, hours of operation were going to be from sunrise to sunset, not prior and later. There was going to be no outdoor speaker system, no commercial kitchen, and no exterior lighting with the exception of safety lights on the building. I have been on my property for about a dozen years at this point and I have seen that Mr. Halla has just Pushed and pushed and pushed with so many other things and that's why we brought up the Private road issue. In 2003 there was supposed to be some of that orange construction fabric running between the edge of the golf course and the private road so that none of the heavy equipment would come up and down and that was one of the things that was spelled out on that evening that everything was approved and so, to and behold the orange fabric went up and then they came and they ripped it down so they could use it for the those. The hours being seasonal are now getting pushed. The sunrise to sunset limits have been pushed. We haven't heard yet about an outdoor speaker system and I hope that's not going to happen. The commercial kitchen not being permitted in the club house was so that there would be no long-range, long -hour thing. It was supposed to just be a spot for kids to run in and get a Coke, have a sandwich, it wasn't supposed to be a place for people to stay long after their golf game. There's lots of other golf courses in the area if people would like to do that. They certainly could but this was a different type of golf course that was being proposed at that time and it just seems like it's changed a lot. I'd like to talk just for a minute about the exterior lighting. We had seen in what you all had written that you had said this, "Just as granting the extended business hours in the variance will M Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 be considered an annoyance to the neighbors in the early morning and evening hours contrary to the original use permit, so will these lights be considered a nuisance. I'm not here to quibble with you. If you say we need to have three 15 -foot lights for safety, that's fine. But I'm starting to get very concerned when they say okay and then there's one by the maintenance building that's going to be shining right into Dave and Judy Walstad's area. There's not that much topography there. It's pretty flat. We can right out to Pioneer Trail right now. It's not a nice, rolling area. It's got little dips but it's not rolling. On page 13 in the booklet that you all did you talked about the sound and site buffers and preservation of views and with not only those lights going in, and again keeping those to a minimum. If we need to have three low I can go along with that but those other buildings and other things, it's really going to change that corner. Mr. Halla does not have bright lights on during the night at his nursery. This is something I've told him repeatedly. The nursery's also called in the past to ask are they being good neighbors. That's never happened with the golf course and so one of the things I've had chance to tell the nursery when they've called is how much we appreciate the lights being low or dark at night. That area is so dark that we are some of the people who come out between sunset and sunrise to be able to look at the start, shooting stars, in August where there's all the comets and things going by. It's a really special place so that's an important thing. I thank you for you all to consider. If the golf course opens and dawn and closes at dusk, I also don't understand why it's so important that there be all those lights there anyway. There's no one going to be there. They also have not really complied with the original landscaping plan at this point. There is a gentleman there named Eric Olson and he's been really good about trying to tell us what he's doing but they have been changing things and so again, I don't know if it's just that they're not going to do it and they're just doing what they have with the trees they have, but they were supposed to be on the plan a whole lot of little shrubby plants that were planted right at the end of the driving range. Those have not gone in. They've put in a berm and some nice pine trees but again, they're just changing things that were on the original plan. Also, when the architect's mentioned, kind of haphazardly, that oh well, the club house is only about 4,000 square feet and that's just like the houses that are in the area, there are no houses in our area that have 4,000 square feet on one floor. That's much, much bigger than our area. To come back to the gravel road just for a second, even though it's private, I just am making this point to show that Mr. Halla has over and over the years, as long as I've been there, kind of disregarded the rules of the City and the guidelines from you pertaining to that road and what it was supposed to be used for. Since the Halla trees no longer exist I believe there's no valid reason for the Halla trucks to utilize this road anymore. It's just meant to be an easement and not a commercial road and it was one of the things again in the original use permit or conditional use permit that MnDOT was asking what part that rad had in the plans for the golf course and as far as we knew, the answer was none. At this point they're using it with their heavy equipment that tears up the road and Mr. Hall does not put money into the repair for the road at all. It is our private road. At this point, the current business use for him to use it is for access to the golf course or accessing the ravine for dumping. It has nothing to do with the nursery so if there's anything that you can do within the limits of having the plan and MnDOT looking at that be considered outside the realm of the golf course, we would really appreciate whatever you could do. We're not in favor of year round business. It seems more suited to a commercially zoned area and if that's what Mr. Halla wants there are other areas where he could do that. This is a landscaping and agricultural area with neighborhoods and so we believe that the original conditional use permit that you gave were 67 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 given so well and thoughtfully, that to come back with all those changes now really changes the heart of what the business was. Thank you very much. McDonald: You're welcome. Thank you. Next? Step right up. State your name and address and address your comments to the Commissioners. Tom Gertz: Commissioners, good evening. Good late evening. My name is Tom Gertz. I live at 10001 Great Plains Boulevard. That's on the southwest corner of the property. I'll show you a map of that in a minute. First off I would like to say that I'm very pro business. I'm very pro small business. This expansion into the golf course really means more jobs created. That's a good thing. Everyone's going to get on board with that. I don't have any qualms with the majority of the proposals that fall within the current ordinances and guidelines. I have no issues there. My issues come with some earlier matters and some current ones which I've actually just learned tonight. I think when you choose to develop a golf course in an area surrounded by residential areas, there should be some caveats. There have to be some limitations there versus if it was surrounded by a commercial site. I've done some golfing. I think I've golfed in both kinds of environments and I do see differences in certain rules and regulations that apply. And in all due respect to the applicant speaking earlier, it's easy to make the case, to make it sound reasonable that we need lights for safety, we have employees that are going to come in early. They have to mow the lawns and maintenance has to be done prior to sunrise and afterwards I want to stop and have a beer before I go home. I agree. On the surface that sounds great. The problem again, this is a residential neighborhood. I believe there has to be some kind of noise ordinance in place for the lawn turf people. I believe they can't start blowers and mowers and things before 7:00 a.m. I don't know that specifically but I know that there are guidelines for that. I would think that those probably are a good model to apply to a golf course as well. Let me show you where I live. Right here. I'm definitely the closest adjacent to this property line ... entire golf course. In the first home on the private road, that private road has five property owners and four dwellings on it. I do happen to bear probably the brunt as my adjacent neighbors of the traffic, commercial traffic, this flotilla of commercial vehicles that is building and developing the golf course. On the surface of that, I tolerate that without great problem during the construction phase of this. I understand you have to access your golf course. There's other way but the straightest line and my property lies between the straightest line between two points so they cross the property. He does have a legal easement to do such. I don't know that that transcends into his flotilla of commercial vehicles but during this construction phase it goes both ways. Neighbors have to be neighborly. I do have issue with the fact that there is no effort in putting in maintenance of that road. We as the private property owners have to do it. I understand it's a private issue but I hope that that relationship will get better and not worse because it's been a bone of contention for some time. I'm up here on the backs of other people's speeches so I'll try not to fracture this out, but the crux of the matter for me is operational hours, simple and clear. In warm weather you have your windows open. Ifmowers are running at 5:00, how am I not going wake up? If operation hours are extended into a 10:00, 11:00, 12:00 night, whatever it may be or end up in actually, and I have to listen to pinging golf balls and doors slamming in the parking lot. That's not a NIMBY issue with me. It's a quality of life issue. I get to sleep. If you do a little quick math of a party of four taking off every eight minutes depending on if they all go together or go separately, that can be 50-200 cars within that hour needing to service that area, something like that. It was quick math. Now that's on a prime Ci 1 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 day. That's a lot of doors slamming at 10:00 and 11:00 at night and I am within proximity of that and I will hear that so that's one of my issues on that point. As far the, going back to the original agreement, the vegetative borders, it has not been installed adjacent to my property. Again, I'm the closest one. I have spoke with Eric who's present here tonight and he's been good to work with and per Eric that it's forthcoming, but it still hasn't. There just hasn't been any progress on that point so I just really wanted to go on record to say that that is still an issue for me. I hope that that still comes to fruition, one so that there's just a natural barrier for golfers not to impede upon my property whether they're chasing golf balls and as the other gentleman stated, may be relieving themselves. I think I'm at the fiuthest point from the club house. That would be nice to get that natural barrier in there. Drainage, I would like to go on record additionally saying I want no additional drain tile installed and drained over my property. There was excavation and drain tile installed across my road on my property without my permission. I took issue with that immediately and I don't know the watershed area that's being drained but it's probably several acres, maybe greater. Eric was very responsive to that and he did install a Pipe that runs over my property so it will not erode it and I appreciate that and currently if that holds up that will be fine. If you'd go back to the original agreement you can see that the requirements were for the vegetative barrier and the type of vegetation. I just ask that that be honored or if there's a deviation in that, come talk tome. I'm a pretty easy guy to work with. I think that's my big talking points and I actually know Bluff Creek didn't have lights a while back. Again, lighting in a much lower grade fashion is probably the desirable thing. It is a very dark neighborhood and there is some benefit to that but my biggest issues comes down to extended hours meaning more noise. It's unavoidable. I wish the endeavor well in success to be profitable but again, within the understanding that it's a neighborhood and there has to be some adjustments. Thank you. McDonald: Thank you very much. Next? Tom Jessen: Good evening. My name is Tom Jessen. I live at 9570 Foxford Road. I'm part of the Lake Riley Woods Homeowners. The primary issue I'd like to address is traffic safety and the intersection which is the main entrance to the golf course and it's also the main exit point that I go to every day to work. I'm afraid you're creating an unsafe traffic issue there. Where my home is at now I watch traffic accidents take place on Highway 101 on that sharp curve that goes north of the intersection of the Highway 101 and Pioneer Trail and it's a dangerous situation that's there and also living in the neighborhood for 13 years, I've had trouble adapting to get this hill to leave home every morning and get onto Pioneer Trail and to do it safely. All the people that are exiting that golf course will be facing the same kind of issue. When traffic comes through there it's going 50-55 miles an hour and with the stop lights that's there, they're coming from the west at a high rate of speed. If you don't pull out properly and pick your opening to get out in the traffic stream, it's very likely going to have some accidents in that area and as related to the issue of drinking and late hours, that intersection is going to be even more dangerous. I was surprised that there wasn't a traffic light involved with them. One time going to work pulling out from that intersection I had a car come up from 101 and Pioneer Trail intersection and he didn't like the way I merged onto the traffic and he rode my bumper all the way to Flying Cloud Drive within 10 feet of my car. If you look at the traffic situation there, I'd say that's something that needs to be looked into, especially with after-hours operation or dark operation with cars coming and going there. Thank you. 69 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 McDonald: Thank you. Would anyone else like to come up and address the Commission? Okay. Seeing no one get up, the public meeting is closed and I will bring the meeting back to the Commission for our review and discussion. Who would hire to start or who would like to go last? Papke: I'll go first before I collapse. McDonald: Okay, Kurt? Papke: Okay. I have the honor of driving by this site twice per day on my commute so I've had the opportunity to observe the construction and so one and my kudos to the applicant on the landscaping. It's really spectacular, I think. The plantings, the waterfall, the boulderscape and so on, very very nice and the club house looks very nicely designed. The maintenance building gives me cause for pause. I'm not going to make any allusions or inferences here but just as a data point for the rest of the Commissioners, the last time I remember Mr. Halla making an application to the Planning Commission, it was to build another building in the nursery for raising koi and that was denied so he has a track record of requesting additional building sites so just a data point there, just for the folks that weren't around back at that point. I'm very concerned with the ambient lighting. As was stated by a number of the residents, I live down in this area, it's very dark and it's amazing how much the lighting carries down there so I think we have to be very sensitive to that. The same thing with the noise issues. I live across from Bluff Creek Golf Course and my bedroom faces the golf course and I can very clearly hear them when they fire up the mowers and 5:00 am. or whatever during the summer so it carries for a long way down there. One of my concerns here overall and this is kind of where I was going with the zoning issues, I have a concern that this has grown from what was kind of a mom and pop type operation that was very limited in scope, to something that is now snowballed. When you get into this kind of a situation as a business owner, you make an investment and you want to make it profitable and sometimes in order to do that you need to invest even more and so what I see happening here is I seen fireplaces planned for the club house, I see what looks like almost like a bar situation, the screened -in porches on both sides, the increased maintenance size. It just looks like there's a tremendous investment that's going into this and I just have a concern that we're going to see the applicant back again looking to enhance this site even more to make this more like a commercial site which is why I think some of the comments from the public were. coming from. What was originally kind of a mom and pop outfit in a residential neighborhood is now starting to resemble a commercial enterprise and I just have a concern that we're creeping into something that we didn't earlier anticipate. Last but not least, there were a couple comments about the water supply and the wells and this was a major issue when it came before the Planning Commission last time. There was a lot of concern about the impact on the water supply. I haven't heard anything since then as this being an issue so as far as I'm aware and heard since then that there weren't any legal issues or code issues surrounding this one. Overall, I have a lot of worries but at the end of they day, once again we're looking at what do we approve as a Planning Commission with the proposal in front of us. I think if we can work something with the lighting, if we're very specific and stringent about the hours of operation here, I think it's a reasonably workable proposal but I think we're going to need to nail down a couple of these things to make sure that we don't stray outside the boundaries. 70 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 McDonald: Thank you. Zorn: My comments. This was the first time that I was able to read through this application and not being on the Commission in 2003, I've been struggling to try and understanding what the 2003 proposal was that was accepted at that time and what the changes are and it really seems that there's different levels of, public members here feel that the proposed plan is significantly different while the applicant indicates that it isn't. My observation I feel is that the zoning isn't, does not seem to be matching up what is before us this evening. The increased lights, the lights for safety reasons, the larger buildings, really do suggest a larger operation here. Once these large buildings are in place that will lead to more profitably and that is what is concerning, especially wanting to max out the number of golfers per day. I think that traffic and noise and additional lighting, I think all of that is peripheral to how this conditional use is interpreted. The hours of operation, I think we need to be very strict in considering this area and that operation, meaning that a sprinkler cannot turn on before 7:00 a.m. I'm strict in that way. I live in an area that's under construction right now and no one can start their saws or radios before 7:00 am. I feel like that shouldn't be any different for a business operation in a residential area. Sprinklers, all of that. I guess have some great concerns in changing the materials also relate back to the surrounding cedar was a very nice choice. Moving towards a metal just seems to be less of a fit for the area. I guess I'm struggling a little because this is new to me but I just feel like there are some big concerns and if we can work with the lighting and perhaps, I guess some other aspects but, I would not be for this at this point. McDonald: Okay. Deborah? Larson: Okay. A couple of the issues I want to bring up is one of the first things that the citizens brought up was it's a safe neighborhood so the crime issue to me and safety lights and having to have the 25 -foot poles just doesn't seem completely necessary at this time. I've lived in Chanhassen 21 years and I've seen it go from farms everywhere to pretty much city and everything else going on. However, one thing the neighborhoods have not taken into consideration is that there is growing population happening, quite a lot of it. We've seen a lot of new neighborhoods going in and high-density homes and other things maybe a Iittle be further west to you. That is going to cause more cars, more people, more everything and so that's something you guys need to think about. It is a growing city and that's progress and that's what happens. That's how towns grow. So, both sides of the fence on that one. I really would prefer to see if we're going to do some sort of lighting, I love the idea. In fact, I was thinking about it, Kurt, when you brought up the short ones. Some of the golf courses that we go to up north, that's what they've got. These low things and they illuminate the ground and their non -obtrusive and they do sufficient lighting so I'd like to see maybe some more feedback into that. I'm not happy with what I'm hearing from the citizens about what the original plan was and what the Halla's have been doing since which aren't quite consistent with what they originally planned to do and the fact that the City hasn't seen it our caught it and I think it maybe needs to be scrutinized more. Hours of operation, I think we also need to be very strict on that. I for one also have my windows open in the summertime and I want to go out and scream at the people that start mowing at 5:00 am. I think it's wrong to have the caliber of machines that are going to be out there doing the courses. It's going to be loud. It's going to be a lot and I think that does 71 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 need to be scrutinized. The thing if they do get a liquor license, that's also too to consider. Hours of operation, I think it should be everybody needs to be off the premises at a given time and it needs to be like and hour before sunset or at sunset, something. For the sake of the citizens, it needs to be a safety issue again if people are going to be pounding down a lot of beers afterwards and that could be a growing problem. That's all I have. McDonald: Okay. Mark? Undestad: The only comment I'm going to have here tonight is with all the issues that are going on and it doesn't sound like there was a lot of communications between the applicant and the neighborhood and the changes that have gone on here and kind of the way we're heading here it doesn't look like we're going to be able to resolve these issues on exactly how can we nail down what are these times and issues with hours of operation. What are our lighting options and some of that stuff. We should maybe send them back to kind of look at, bring some more options back as far as lighting and come up with something that makes sense for hours of operation. If you use the sunrise to sunset, it keeps ticking off through the season. 'There just are a lot of issues on this matter that are unresolved right now. McDonald: Okay. Dan? Keefe: I'll try to keep my comments fairly short. I'm disappointed that the applicant hasn't met with the neighbors, particularly given where the previous owner was and then where the site is and the surrounding neighbors. I think they should have made a bigger effort to engage the local residents. I'm concerned with, I'm going to consider it the incrementalism. I kind of look as this as we'll try to continue to try and build this thing and we'll add on, we'll add on, we'll add on to make it a fairly low-cost business site. I'm a business guy and I kind of understand that but I'm concerned just about the location here and the lack of working with the local residents to try and get a proper fit. I'm against the lights. I just don't have enough evidence on the safety issue. I liked the comment on Bluff Creek Golf Course. I'm just not convinced on the need for safety. I think that links in a little bit to the incrementalism and I have a concern there. The conditional use permit I think would be alright but I would want to amend what is stated here on number 9. In regards to the site plan review, I'm generally okay with it. I like the landscaping like Kurt said. I think they're doing a great job there. Generally the site plan, yeah the buildings are bigger but if you look at the alternative to go maybe to residential or something like that, you look at the number of buildings and go well, its a few buildings. So I'm generally okay with the site plan. I'm in agreement with the City in regards to the denial on the variances which would be to not allow the corrugated metal or allow the golf course to be open from 6:00 am. to 11:00 p.m. Essentially we revert back to the other one which is sunrise to sunset as I understand it. Those are my comments. McDonald. Well, I'm not quite sure where to begin. I guess the first thing is that I understand the arguments that the applicant makes as far as the economics. You have to do what you've got to do within your particular business in order to make money. That being said though, as I've said before, a deal is a deal is a deal. We had an applicant in here earlier that wanted to change a deal that had been made as far as the wetlands. We denied it. I see this as creeping commercialism. Everybody agreed in the beginning as to what this was going to be. Both sides 72 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 said that this would work. We can live with it. We can go forward with it and it will he a great addition to the neighborhood. Suddenly, we're all told this wasn't quite it. It needs to change because of these reasons and those reasons and I guess I'm really disappointed because one of the things that seems to work the best when you want to make changes is you will talk to your neighbors and you will get at least as much support as you possibly can so that there is at least a couple that will speak in favor of what you are wanting to do. As I said in the beginning, I've got a pile of emails. I've got a bunch of emails here. Staffs gotten calls. We have been inundated with everybody speaking against this and for a number of reasons. The big thing is, they're afraid this is going to grow into a big retail outlet where food, drink, whatever, you name it is going to expand. I do have concerns is that the next thing is you'll be in here asking for lights for the driving range. That was not in the bargain. The issues of safety, I'm not sure what safety we're talking about. At one time I thought we were talking about individual safety of going back and forth in a darkened lot to get to a car. Well, if that's what it is I agree. That doesn't require 15 or 25 -foot lights. I think you can light a parking lot so that you can safely get back and forth to a vehicle. If you're talking about crime, that's different. Maybe that is the 15 to 25 -foot lights but as has been said, this is not an area with a history of crime. I don't know of any place within Chanhassen right now with a history of crime that it requires that type of scrutiny. Because of that, I have to tell you I can't support any of this and where I am at is that the original permit that was agreed to and bargained with in the beginning, that is the deal and unless there are better reasons than just economic to change this, I could not support it. With that being said, I'm open for a motion from the Commissioners. Papke: I'll get one going here just so we have something to deal with. I make a motion that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the following motions. Conditional Use Permit as stated in the staff report. Condition number 9 I would like to change the height of the light pole may not exceed four feet instead of the 15 feet stated. The motion includes conditions 1-9 as stated in the staff report and then amended as I just mentioned. I would also like to add condition number 10 that the hours of operation will be sunrise to sunset as previously stated and that will include and mowing and customer traffic outside of those hour are prohibited. The second motion is I'd like to make a motion that the City Council denies Variance Planning Case 05-39 and I would like to amend it as stated in the staff report. I'd like to remove the term "corrugated" so it will state "denies variance for metal to be used as the exterior material and I'd like to clarify this to say "and denies variance to allowance of the golf course to be open from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. because I think there's too much ambiguity in the way its stated there so I want to make sure its clear that both of those are being denied. McDonald: Do I have a second? Zorn: Second. McDonald: I have a second. I have a question for the Commission. Do we need to vote on these individually as each one or is this one big? Each one? Just one? Okay. Having said that along with the changes that Kurt has made, all in favor, say aye. Papke: Did you want to ask for any friendly amendments? W Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 McDonald: Does anybody want to ad any friendly amendments? Keefe: Could you restate your number 10 again? Papke: Number 10 is that specifically the hours of operation will remain sunrise to sunset and specifically no mowing nor customer traffic allowed outside of those hours of operation. Undestad: Do we need to put anything in there as far as the seasonal stuff too? What are they doing? How long? Papke: I don't think they're going to mow during the winter. Larson: Yeah, but they wanted to have operations year round so do we want to friendly amend that it's spring through fall? McDonald: In that case, what you're wanting to do is to stick to the original agreement which was hours of operation shall be seasonal and limited to sunrise to sunset. Papke: What's seasonal? If we're going to do that we should state what is seasonal. Larson: Lack of snow and ice? McDonald: Well, that's one of the problems with some of this is, what is seasonal and what is sunrise to sunset? Larson: And when we have that 80 -degree day in November? McDonald: I'm not sure that we as a Planning Commission can define those particular terms. All we can do is say you must adhere to it and if you want clarification that's above our paid rate. Papke: Was there a friendly amendment there Deborah, or not? Larson: Yes. Well, no because it's already there. Zorn: Kurt, could you please repeat your motion so I make certain I vote accurately? Papke: The motion is as stated in the staff report with the following exceptions. The first exception is a change to condition number 9 to limit the height of the light pole to four feet. The second change is to add amendment number 10 which prohibits mowing and customer traffic outside of the allowed hours of operation which is sunrise to sunset, and the third change is to remove corrugated from the denial of the variance so it denies a variance for metal to be used, so this would not be a metal building in any shape or form. Also, make sure that we deny the extension of the golf course hours. 74 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 McDonald: So I think that what you're saying is the course would be open from sunrise to sunset? Papke: Yes. Period. McDonald: Any other amendments or clarifications? Okay. Papke moved, Zorn seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve an amendment to Conditional Use Permit #20034 CUP, Planning Case 05-39 for the construction of a golf course with a club house as shown in plans dated received January 6, 2006, with the following amendment to condition 9 of the existing conditional use permit and the addition of condition 10: 9. No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety lights which includes parking lot lights and drive aisle lights. The height of the light pole may not exceed 4 feet. All light fixtures must meet ordinance requirements. 10. Mowing and customer traffic outside of the allowed hours of operation which is sunrise to sunset is prohibited. Papke and Zorn voted in favor, Undestad, Keefe, McDonald and Larson voted in opposition. The motion failed with a vote of 2 to 4. Papke moved, Zorn seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve an amendment to Site Plan Review #2003-7 SPR, Planning Case 05-39 for the construction of a club house, a maintenance building, a golf ball washing building and a lean-to for a golf course as shown in plans dated received January 6, 2006, with the following added conditions: Applicant shall increase landscape plantings to meet minimum requirements for parking lot trees. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the City prior to City Council approval. 2. Applicant shall fully screen parking lots from adjacent roadways through the use of berming or increased landscaping. The applicant must submit detailed architectural plans for the maintenance building, golf ball washing building and lean-to that meet the design ordinance requirement. 4. Comply with all conditions of the MnDot review letter dated November 23, 2005. The temporary 120 square foot octagon building is permitted for a maximum of 12 months from the day the City Council approves this application, or when the certificate of occupancy for the club house has been issued, whichever comes first. 75 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 6. The applicant is responsible for obtaining and complying with MnDot and Carver County permits and approval on any grading that takes place along the north and west side of the property. 7. All disturbed areas are required to be restored with seed and mulch within two weeks of grading completion. 8. All plans must be signed by a professional civil engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Papke and Zorn voted in favor, Undestad, Keefe, McDonald and Larson voted in opposition. The motion failed with a vote of 2 to 4. Papke moved, Zorn seconded that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council denies Variance, Planning Case 05-39 for metal to be used as the exterior material of the maintenance and golf ball washing buildings, and denies the variance allowing the golf course to be open from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., based upon the findings in the staff report and the following: 1. The applicant has not demonstrated a hardship. 2. The property owner has reasonable use of the property. Papke and Zorn voted in favor, Undestad, Keefe, McDonald and Larson voted in opposition. The motion failed with a vote of 2 to 4. Larson: Wait. Did we say that wrong. McDonald: It doesn't make any difference. The motion fails. Larson: But I wanted a nay. McDonald: The motion fails 4 to 2. Papke: You were either voting for or against my motion. Larson: Right. Okay. I don't know. McDonald: The motion fails 4 to 2. Larson: Okay. I don't think that's what I meant. McDonald: The request for the additions are denied and what we're left with is the current conditional use permit and the applicant will I'm sure... Larson: I'm confused as to... we, Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 McDonald: Well it goes to City Council but what we are doing is forwarding it with a recommendation that the amendments be denied. Generous: That would be the second... Would you have to approve that though? Larson: Did I vote how I wanted to? McDonald: I beg your pardon? Generous: ...move denial of the proposed amendments? McDonald: We are denying the proposed amendments to the conditional use plan as presented to us here. Larson: No. That's not what happened. Generous: No, that would be another... McDonald: Well, even as amended by you... Generous: This was to approve with the changes to the conditions. McDonald: Right. Larson: Okay. Who am I denying? Who did I say yea to? McDonald: You said yea to Kurt's motion which he changed their amendment to allow for the four -foot height and the limitation of hours and the elimination of corrugated and no metal building would be allowed. Larson: Okay. That's what I meant. McDonald: What the Commission voted against and denied was that motion, which means what we're left with is the current conditional use permit so we have denied the applicant's request to expand his current conditional use permit. John Kosmas: That's not the way the recommendation of staff... Larson: See, that's what so confusing... McDonald: We denied staff's recommendation. We voted against it. John Kosmas: No, you modified it. McDonald: Then we voted against his. 77 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 John Kosmas: I heard a 4 to 2 positive. McDonald: No, you heard a 4 to 2 nay. Its 2 positive, 2 against, (correction) 4 against. John Kosmas: I misunderstood the direction that you took. So, the motion was to deny the recommendation of staff? McDonald: Yes. John Kosmas: Even though the motion was positive? McDonald: Even though he amended your motion, we still denied it. John Kosmas: Okay. Can I poll? I would like to know who are, I mean I want just to understand... McDonald: You can poll. I have no problem. Papke: Yea. Zorn; Nay. McDonald: Nay. Larson: Yea. Undestad: Nay. Keefe: Nay. John Kosmas: Okay. That's not what I heard when it was, it was too far back. So now what happens? McDonald: It goes to City Council. City Council can either approve or... Okay. That planning case is over. Next? Do I have a recognition of the minutes? APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Zorn noted the verbatim and summary minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated January 3, 2006 as presented. McDonald: Okay. A reminder, next week on February 13 at 6:00 p.m. we're to meet at the City Council. Acting Chairman McDonald adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 11:45 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director m Prepared by Nann Opheim/Kim Meuwissen 3015 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 Feet Golf Work Start End Watering Course Start Time of Play of Play Time Bluff Creek ` 1/2 hour before Light enough Too dark to overnight 952445-5685 sunrise to see see Mike Chaska Par 30 1/2 hour before Light enough Close when overnight n 952443-3642 sunrise to see last golfer Mark leaves - 10:30p-1 1p Dahlereen 1 g 1/2 hour before sunrise Play till dark overnight 952448-1676, ext #6 sunrise Clubhouse Kieth varies l Op - Midnight Hazeltine 1/2 hour before First light dark overnight 9524484929 sunrise Stonebrooke 1 g fi� 1/2 hr - 45 min sunrise dark overnight 52 A AC AAAI 9524 7Ji-YYJ-'Y before sunrise Dwayne Braemar 17 As soon as there is 6:00am dark overnight 952-826-6799 tight Deer Run 5:15am - 6:00am dark overnight 952443-2351 1 g 5:30am June 2006 Minneapolis -St. Paul, Minnesota Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 V3 Sun Rise: 5:29am Sun Rise: 5:29am Sun Rise: 5:28am Sun Set: 8:51pm Sun Set: 8:52pm Sun Set: 8:53pm Moon Rise: 10:28am Moon Rise: 11:35am Moon Rise: 12:39pm Moon Set: 1:04am Moon Set: 1:27am Moon Set: 1:45am First Qtr. 5:06pm 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Sun Rise: 5:28am Sun Rise: 5:28am Sun Rise: 5:27am Sun Rise: 5:27am Sun Rise: 5:26am Sun Rise: 5:26am Sun Rise: 5:26am Sun Set: 8:54pm Sun Set: 8:55pm Sun Set: 8:55pm Sun Set: 8:56pm Sun Set: 8:57pm Sun Set: 8:57pm Sun Set: 8:58pm Moon Rise: 1:42pm Moon Rise: 2:45pm Moon Rise: 3:50pm Moon Rise: 4:57pm Moon Rise: 6:07pm Moon Rise: 7:21pm Moon Rise: 8:35pm Moon Set: 2:02am Moon Set: 2:17am Moon Set: 2:33am Moon Set: 2:49am Moon Set: 3:09am Moon Set: 3:32am Moon Set: 4:03am 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Sun Rise: 5:26am Sun Rise: 5:26am Sun Rise: 5:25am Sun Rise: 5:25am Sun Rise: 5:25am Sun Rise: 5:25am Sun Rise: 5:25am Sun Set: 8:59pm Sun Set: 8:59pm Sun Set: 9:00pm Sun Set: 9:00pm Sun Set: 9:01 pm Sun Set: 9:01pm Sun Set: 9:02pm Moon Rise: 9:44pm Moon Rise: 10:43pm Moon Rise: 11:30pm Moon Rise: none Moon Rise: 12:06am Moon Rise: 12:34am Moon Rise: 12:57am Moon Set: 4:45am Moon Set: 5:39am Moon Set: 6:47am Moan Set: 8:05am Moon Set: 9:26am Moon Set: 10:47am Moon Set: 12:08pm Full Moon: 12:04pm 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Sun Rise: 5:25am Sun Rise: 5:26am Sun Rise: 5:26am Sun Rise: 5:26am Sun Rise: 5:26am Sun Rise: 5:26am Sun Rise: 5:27am Sun Set: 9:02pm Sun Set: 9:02pm Sun Set: 9:03pm Sun Set: 9:03pm Sun Set: 9:03pm Sun Set: 9:03pm Sun Set: 9:03pm Moon Rise: 1:17am Moon Rise: 1:36am Moon Rise: 1:55am Moon Rise: 2:17am Moon Rise: 2:44am Moon Rise: 3:17am Moon Rise: 3:59am Moon Set: 1:23pm Moon Set: 2:39pm Moon Set: 3:57pm Moon Set: 5:15pm Moon Set: 6:33pm Moon Set: 7:47pm Moon Set: 8:54pm Last Qtr: 8:09am 25 26 27 28 29 30 Sun Rise: 5:27am Sun Rise: 5:27am Sun Rise: 5:28am Sun Rise: 5:28am Sun Rise: 5:29am Sun Rise: 5:29am Sun Set: 9:03pm Sun Set::09 4om Sun Set:9:04 m�� Sun Set: 9:04pm Sun Set: 9:04pm Sun Set: 9:03pm Moon Rise: 4:52am Moon Rise: 5:55am Moon Rlse:7:03am Moon Rise: VTam Moon Rise: 9:21am Moon Rise: 10:26am Moon Set: 9:49pm Moon Set: 10:32pm Moon Set: 11:04pm Moon Set: 11:29pm Moon Set: 11:50pm Moon Set: none New Moon: 10:06am Post -it' Fax Note 7671 Daep $ p7 --of-1, TO 0. From Ai Au-se-Im' Phw A Document No. OFFICE OF THE A 4 410 7 4 COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Fee $ 46.00 Check# 15736 mortified Recorded on 05-12-2006 at 03:00 441074 III 1111111111111111 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA HALLA GREENS- PLANNING CASE NO. 05-39 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #03-04 RESTATED AND AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ❑AMPM V U lll Carl W Hanson, Jr. County Recorder 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants a conditional use permit for the following use: For the construction of a golf course with a club house in an Agricultural Estate District. 2. Property. The permit is for property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as follows: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, Block 2; and Lots 1 and 2, Block 3; Lots 1 and 2 Block 4; Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 5; Outlot A; Together with vacated Columbine Trail, vacated Hibiscus Trail; vacated Periwinkle Trail; and vacated Halla Nursery Drive West; all in the recorded plat of Halla Great Plains Addition, Carver County, Minnesota. 3. Conditions. The Conditional Use Permit 2003-4 CUP — Planning Case 05-39 is issued for the construction of a golf course with a club house as shown in plans dated received January 6, 2006, with the following conditions: a. Hours of operation shall be seasonal and limited to Civil Sunrise to Nautical Sunset. b. No outdoor speaker system shall be permitted (individual pager systems are permissible). c. No commercial kitchen shall be permitted in the club house. There shall be no cooking equipment permitted on the premises with the exception of a microwave oven, pizza/ toaster oven, etc. The intent of this condition is to put the golf course operator on notice. The proposed septic system design does not allow for any cooking grease to be disposed through the system which will cause the system to fail. d. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit is contingent upon approval of Site Plan Review #2003-07 SPR. SCANNED e. Soil tests must be performed at least once a year. Results of all soil testing must be submitted to the City of Chanhassen. In addition, annual reports detailing all applications of fertilizer (including nutrient content for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium; application rate in pounds per acre; date of application; and total quantity of fertilizer applied) must be submitted to the City of Chanhassen. No fertilizer containing phosphorus may be applied unless the soil test results demonstrate a deficiency in phosphorus. f. No grading, disturbance or dumping shall be permitted in areas designated as bluff or in bluff impact zones. Runoff from cart paths, fairways, greens or tee boxes on Hole 3 shall not be directed into bluff impact zones or bluff areas. g. On-site grading may not increase the rate or volume of runoff downstream from the site or onto adjacent properties. h. The applicant shall enter into a conditional use permit with the City. No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety lights which include parking lot lights, soffit lights and drive aisle lights. The height of the light poles in the parking lot and along the entrance driveway (total of five fixtures) may not exceed 15 feet. The remaining light fixtures may not exceed 4 feet in height. All light fixtures must meet ordinance requirements. All lights with the exception of the light located in the center island of the parking lot and the club house soffit lights, shall be shut off one hour after sunset. The applicant/owner/lessee shall apply pesticides only when needed. Use products that are most effective, target specific, and present the least hazards to people, wildlife, and the environment. k. A retail pro shop is permitted within the clubhouse. Retail operations shall not occupy more than 20% of one floor. Retail sales are limited to food, beverages, and golf -related items. 1. Hours of maintenance operation shall be limited to Civil Sunrise to Nautical Sunset. 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. 5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: March 20, 2006 CITY OF CHANHASSEN IINIAA —WI / \g, Mayor (SEAL) Gerhardt, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (sS COUNTY OF CARVER ) 4�h The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisday of A, D(� 2006, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. 4 I, NOTARY ��A��j JWKIMIL MEUWISSEN otblic-Minnesota CoExpires Jan 31, 2010 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 gAplan\2005 planning cases\05-39 halla greens 03-07 site plan amendment\cup agreement.doe sunset. Typically a minimum lighting level that is recommended by the law enforcement groups would be an average1 foot candle at all public walkways etc. It is also recommended for security of the buildings and equipment a minimal light level should be maintained through out the evening hours to reduce vandalism etc. 2. The course currently includes a driving range and in the future a family miniature golf course, both of which require the use of lighting during the evening hours of operation. Therefore, the current restrictions need to be modified to provide for proper safety and operation of the business, thus allowing lighting for the driving range and future miniature golf area. At this time the proposed lighting plan for the parking lot and entrance drive is below the city guidelines of .5 foot candles at the property line with readings ranging from "0" foot candles to .2 foot candles. The maximum proposed is less than 50 percent of the city guidelines. Lighting for the driving range is currently being evaluated and the information should be available shortly. Facade transparency: (Architectural Compliance data) The evaluation comment that states, "All facades viewed by the public must contain more than 50 percent windows". The proposed front (north) elevation contains 25 percent glass windows and doors using the wall area only. If the screened in portion of the verandas are included in the area the percentage changes to 49 percent. Therefore some adjustment needs to be made allowing the slightly lesser percentage. The parking setback from Co. Rd. 14 (Pioneer Trail) to be 50 feet. The proposed curb line is located at 50.2 feet and will be maintained. The original berming and landscaping will be modified to maintain desired drainage required along side Co. Rd. 14. The parking is depressed about 4 feet from the road surface thus eliminating the need to screen headlight glare towards the roadway. For visual enhancement plantings compatible with the soil, snow, salt and drainage conditions will be installed, including wild flowers and water tolerant trees. 8. There is no mention of the Clubhouse being open year around. Since they have the facilities for coffee and sandwiches it makes sense that they have the option to be open all year rather than just the summer period. I request that the language included with the CUP includes the statement that the facility will be open for 12 months, not just seasonal. 1 also recommend that the reference that they will be open from sunrise to sunset be deleted. The statement should read, "The facility will maintain normal business hours", example 6:00 AM to 11:00 PM. 9. Original application did not include the request for a temporary building facility for daily operations during the period when the main buildings are under construction. Due to the current schedule of construction I request that a facility be allowed to serve as a temporary customer and employee building. The facility would allow customers to pay KKD - HALLA GREENS - CUP / SPR UPDATE INFORMATION 1-6-06 3 K K DESIGN 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD. ST.LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 (952) 922 - 3226 Minnesota Dei .Arnent of Transportation Metropolitan District Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville MN 55113-3174 November 23, 2005 Ms. Kate Aanenson Community Development Director City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Subject: Halla Greens Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) Review # S 05-103 Southeast quadrant of Trunk Highway (TH) 101 and Pioneer Trail (CSAH 14) Chanhassen/ Carver County TH 101 Mn/DOT Control Section # 1009 Dear Ms. Aanenson: The Mn/DOT Metro District has reviewed the -above referenced site plan. The following comments need to be addressed in addition to the comments from our letters dated August 26, 2003, and September 2, 2003 (enclosed). Area Engineer comments. Please provide additional information on the intent of the proposed modifications to the existing gravel driveway, and the use of the existing gravel driveway at the south end of the site plan, off of TH 101. It is not possible to determine from the plans submitted whether the existing gravel driveway has been moved to be located opposite from Halla Nursery Drive, as shown in the 2003 plan. Please provide additional information concerning the location of the gravel driveway. The site plan is not clear on the access point from TH 101. The gravel road appears to have a possible connection to the golf course property. If Halla Greens is using the gravel access road, they must apply for a Mn/DOT access permit. For questions on these points, please call Lynn Clarkowski, Mn/DOT Metro District South Area Engineer, at (651) 634-2103. Right of Way Office comments: We are enclosing a copy of Mn/DOT right of way plat number 10-34 for your information. The developer needs to refer to this platin site plans and other related drawings, so that Mn/DOT's existing right of way is accurately identified and labeled. The site plan submitted to Mn/DOT appears to show the Mn/DOT right of way as it existed prior to the construction of State Project SP # 1009-14. Mn/DOT's right of way is now one hundred twenty (120) feet wide along TH 101 for a distance. There is also a "sight comer" that has been taken by Mn/DOT via condemnation on the southeast comer of TH 101 and CSAH 14. In addition, please depict Mn/DOT access control with appropriate symbolization. For questions on these points, please call Lee Williams, Mn/DOT Metro District Right of Way Office, at (651) 582-1275 An equal opportunity employer Water Resources Engineering comments: A Mn/DOT drainage permit shall be required. A grading plan depicting the correct right- of-way lines is needed. The City or project developer will need to submit before/after hydraulic computations for the 100 year rainfall event verifying that all existing drainage patterns and systems affecting Mn/DOT right of way will be perpetuated. In addition, please submit information documenting the performance of the pond located at the northeast comer of the golf course. Drainage runoff rates to Mn/DOT right of way for the proposed condition must not increase over the existing condition, and drainage patterns must not change. For questions on these points, please call Bryce Fossand, at Mn/DOT Metro District Water Resources Engineering, at (651) 634-2408. Traffic Engineering comments: A Right Tum Lane, on Pioneer Trail, for the new access, should be constructed. This is especially important with the traffic signal at TH 10I/Pioneer Trail. For questions on these points, please call Lars Impola, Mn/DOT Metro District Traffic Engineering, at (651)634-2379. Design comments: For liability reasons, steps should be taken to insure that errant golf balls do not enter the TH 101 right of way, or the TH 101 driving/turning lanes. For questions on these points, please call Ken Ljung, Mn/DOT Metro District Design Office at (651) 634-2113. Permits comments: The berm has been constructed on Mn/DOT right-of-way and needs to be removed. Mn/DOT has had major drainage problems (flooding) on TH 101 due to this berm. A drainage permit is required. Any use of or work within or affecting Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/tecsup/utility. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. County State Aid Highway (CSAH) comments: As a reminder, CSAH 14 is a County State Aid Highway (CSAH) Route. Any work on a CSAH route must meet State Aid rules and policies. ➢ http://www.dot.state.mn.us/stateaid/ shows or has links to the applicable forms and the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual. ➢ Refer to the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual, Chapter 5-892.200 for information regarding standards and policies. ➢ Please go to http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/arule/8820/ for information regarding State Aid Operations Rules Chapter 8820. ➢ For driveway standards, the designer is directed to refer to the Mn/DOT Road Design Manual (English) Table 5-3.04A and Figure 5-3.04A for guidance and policies. Please contact Jim Deeny in our State Aid section at (651) 582-1389 with any additional questions. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Review Coordinator Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's 30 -day review and response process to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 651-582-1462. Sincerely, 4 mx�- �4C Mary McNeff Transportation Planner Enclosures — Mn/DOT right of way plat No. 10-34 Mn/DOT letter dated August 26, 2003 Mn/DOT letter dated September 2, 2003 cc: John Freemyer, Carver County Surveyor Roger Gustafson, Carver County Engineer Kevin Norby, Herfort Norby Golf Course Architects, Eden Prairie, MN +m"Exo,i g Minnesota Department of Transportation s E 4+ �� Metropolitan Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road 132 Roseville, MN 55113 August 26, 2003 Sharmeen Al-Jaff Planning Departrnent, City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Chanhassen Short Course, Mn/DOT Review #S03-039 SE Quad of T11 101 and Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, Carver Co. Control Section 1009 The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above referenced site plan. Please address the following issues before any further development As you may be aware, Mn/DOT has an intersection improvement project at TH 101 and Pioneer Trail scheduled for October 2004. This project will be acquiring right of way from the southeast quadrant of the intersection, which will affect the proposed golf course. In addition a temporary easement will also be needed from approximately 650 feet east and south of the TH 101 and Pioneer Trail intersection. In addition, sheet 3 of the plan set for the golf r." *s vhnws p or sal where Mn/DOT will need construction easement These planting should not be installed until after the intersection reconstruction or they should be moved outside of the area Mn/DOT will need for construction easement Please contact Geoffrey Prelgo Mn/DOT Design Engineer, at (651) 634-2355 with questions regarding this issue. • For liability reasons, the city or developer should install netting along TH 101 at the 8°i hole to prevent golf balls from entering the highway. • A Mn/DOT Drainage permit is required. Drainage computations for the pond in the northeast comer of the golf course near hole nine must be submitted to determine the off-site drainage entering the construction project. Please contact Martin Korthank, Water Resources Engineer, at (651) 634-2077 with questions regarding this issue. • A Mn/DOT Access permit will be required for the new access onto TH 101. Mn/DOT would also recommend that the golf course have an east -bound right turn4ane off of Pioneer Trail. • Any use of or work within MrJDOT right of way requires a permit. Two Mn/ -)OT permits will be required for this development. Please direct questions regarding permit applications to Keith VanWagner (651-582-1443) of Mn/DOT's Permits section. • Please send a copy of the final plat for Mn/DOT review to the following address: David Torfm Mn/DOT—Metro West Surveys 2055 N. Lilac Drive Golden Valley, MN 55422 Phone: (763) 797-3113 An equal opportunity employer Asa reminder, Pioneer Trail is County State Aid Route 14. Any work on a CSAH route must meet State Aid rules and policies. Also, the County must review any changes to its County State Aid system so that they stay within its system limitations. Please note that CSAH 14 is Carver County's jurisdiction and the County must have the opportunity to review and comment on the development as well. You may obtain additional information regarding State Aid rules and policies in any of the following ways: ➢ http://wNNw.doLstate.mn.us/stateaid/ shows or has links to the applicable forms and the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual. ➢ Refer to the MnIDOT State Aid Manual, Chapter 5-892.200 for information regarding standards and policies. ➢ Please go to httn:/hvww.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/aruleJ8820/ for information regarding State Aid Operations Rules Chapter 8820. ➢ For driveway standards, the designer is directed to refer to the Mn/DOT Road Design Manual (English) Table 5-3.04A and Figure 5-3.04A for guidance and policies. Driveway widths, other than those recommended, up to 50 feet will be permitted only by special permission of the Commissioner of Transportation or designee. Please contact Jim Deeny in our State Aid section at (651) 582-1389 with any additional questions. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Paul Czech Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 WeSv , oad B ,J . Roseville, Minnesota 55l l3 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2j copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's review and response to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions concerning this review. please feel free to contact me at (651) 582- 1378. Sincerely, rigid Gombol Senior Transportation Planner Copy: Roger Gustafson / Carver County Engineer John Freemyer / Carver County Surveyor Ron Saatzer / Owner Herfort NorbyZolf Course Architects Sathre-Berquist, Inc. Blind Copy: Lars Impola David Torfin Jim Deeny Keith VanWaguer Ann Braden Lynn Clarkowski Geoffrey Prelgo Martin Korthank Mn/DOT LGL File — Waconia AA.Jrl r: -O! _ ... .-.- ... comcmdy JUS -2003 10:25 CARVER COUNTY PUBL I C WKS. November 1, 2005 CARVER COUNTY PARKS 11360 Highway 212 West, P.O. Box 330 Cologne, MN 55322-0330 Phone(952)466-5250 Fax(952)466-5223 www.co.carver.mmus/parks Sharmeen AI-Jaff - Chanhassen Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Halla Greens Request for a Site Plan Amendment Planning Case 05-39 Dear Ms. AI-Jaff: 9524665223 P.02iO3 Department of Public work->, Fax (952) 4!4--:•22'.: The Carver County Public Works Division has reviewed the request for a site plan amendment for Halla Greens as transmitted to our office by your memo dated October 21, 2005. The request is for an expansion and redesign of a club house that will be located on the property. Carver County Pi ihlic Works is not opposed to the clubhouse expancinn hi t wo are concerned about the location of the proposed parking lot for the clubhouse facility. During the reconstruction and traffic signal installation at the CSAH 14 (Pioneer Trail) and TH 101 intersection in 2005, Carver County Public Works became aware of some differences of opinion between Mr. Halla and Carver County Public Works about the location of the south easement line for CSAH 14 (Pioneer Trail) as it was established in 1989. These differences of opinion are a result of some ambiguities of interpretation of the right of way documents that were signed and recorded in 1989 as part of the CSAH 14 reconstruction project. Carver County's road easement is 100 feet wide, centered on the road as it was constructed in 1989. The north line of the easement is the Lake Riley Woods south plat line. The south line off the easement is located 100 feet south of this Lake Riley Woods plat line. In review of Grading Plan Sheet 2 that was submitted as part of this request for an amendment to the development plan, the north edge of the planned parking lot is shown to be located approximately 92 feet from the south plat line of the Lake Riley Woods subdivision. This would appear to indicate that approximately 8 to 10 feet of the north edge of the parking lot will be located within the roadway easement area. The parking lot cannot infringe into the permanent roadway easement. NOV-04-2005 10:25 CARVER COUNTY PUBLIC WKS. 9524665223 P.03iO3 Letter to City of Chanhassen November 1, 2005 Page 2 of 2 If the City of Chanhassen approves the Halla Greens site plan amendment, the Carver County Public Works Division requests that the City include a condition in the amendment requiring that any further improvements or construction related activities that occur on this development be completed outside the CSAH 14 right of way which extends 50 feet south of the centerline of CSAH 14. Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal and this consideration. If there are further questions regarding this letter, please call me at 952-466-5207. Sincerely, William J. Weckman, P.E. Assistant County Engineer Cc: Don Halla Roger Gustafson, County Engineer wsV.\R&B/General Road Maintenance/CSAH/14/Halla-Cahn Let 110105 Page 1 of 1 Al-laff, Sharmeen From: thomas anderson landersonthomase@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 3:12 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: Halla Greens Sharmeen, My name is Tom Anderson. I live in Lake Riley Woods behind David Gatto's house. I am very concerned with the proposed changes that are being added to the conditional use permit for Hala Greens. The change that alarms me the most is the addition of the parking lot lights. The back of my house faces Pioneer Trail and already we have seen dramatic increases in traffic. Parking lot lights across the mad would light up the inside of my house and I would have no say in when.they went on and off. Please take this into condideration when you are discussing the additions. It seems to me a bit misleading when certain things are agreed upon and then we have to defend ourselves aginst a bunch of additional items. I will be in attendance at this evening's meeting. Sincerely, Tom Anderson Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. 2/7/2006 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Walstad, David P [DWALSTAD@amfam.coml Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 11:32 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: Halla Greens Comments for 2/7/06 Planning Commission Mtg Sharmeen, My wife and I live at 10071 Great Plains Blvd, which is directly South of the Halla Greens property. I am out of the state and will not be able to attend the 2/7/06 Planning Commission meeting, so I wanted to email you with some comments, questions and concerns over the Halla Greens proposal. Please include this in the written comments for the Planning Commission meeting. We are very concerned and upset over the requests to expand the proposal far beyond what was originally represented and approved, especially when there have been several incidents where prior approvals, permits, and agreements have been violated or ignored. The new proposal from applicants Don Halla and KK Design dated January 6, 2006 differs drastically from the prior proposals from Ron Saatzer and Herfort Norby Golf Course Architects. Is this the same ownership entity as initially proposed? It seems that there are different principals, different designers, and a vastly different operation plan for this property than what was presented in prior meetings. It's hand to see how this is just a site plan and conditional use "amendment". It seems to be an entirely new operation and proposal from different principals. The January 6, 2006 letter from John Kosmas includes several statements under section 5. Lighting that have absolutely nothing to do with lighting or safety issues, and clearly show intent to develop this land far beyond what was represented or approved. Expansion of Operations: The initial requirement was for no exterior lighting. After earlier reviews, the proposal was amended to "No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety light." Now, according to the applicant, it is necessary to light up the parking lot with 27' towers, light up all of the buildings inside and out throughout the evening hours, add a miniature golf course with lights, add lights to the driving range, stay open from 6:OOam to 11:OOpm, and stay open year round in order to provide safety lights. This is ridiculous, and clearly designed as either property protection or income generation devices. Exterior Lighting: On the surface, it appears reasonable to have parking lot lighting for personal safety, but Bluff Creek golf course has no parking lot lights. If the hours and seasonal nature of the business are not extended, there is no reason to have lights on all night. If the concern is truly for personal safety, and it's deemed necessary to have parking lot lights, they should be put on timers to shut off after the business is closed. We do not support all night lighting solely for personal property protection. If that is a major concern, the applicant should install an alarm system. Miniature Golf Course: John Kosmas makes the statement (not a request) that "The course currently includes a driving range and in the future a family miniature golf course, both of with require the use of lighting during the evening hours of operation." What miniature golf course? The proposal does not "currently" include this and there is to be no "evening hours of operation". A miniature golf course is not a golf course, and is not considered as such by the City's zoning district codes for permitted, accessory or conditional uses. The City website lists miniature golf courses separately as permitted in zoning districts BH -Highway Business or BG -General Business, and conditional in BF -Fringe Business. None of these apply to this property. We are not located in a business district and do not want to turn this area into one. I don't see where the Planning Commission letter dated 2/7/06 specifically addresses this issue. I would like to see the denial of a miniature golf course on this premises in writing in the document. Year Round Operation, Hours of Business: We strongly oppose year round operation. Operation of what? Hardly to sell a few sandwiches and coffee, as the applicant's proposal states. It is not necessary for a golf course to be open year round. We strongly oppose keeping the driving range open year round and lighting it. There is already a business 1 mile south of this property that provides this service to the general public in a area that is appropriately zoned for it. This golf course attained approval by representing it was seasonal use only, as a sunrise to sunset operation. We strongly oppose any expansion of this for either winter use or from 6:OOam to 11:00am. Please clarify what "sunrise to sunset" means, as we are concerned over the vagueness of the wording. Sunrise and sunset are exact times of day that vary by day. Does this mean that no public is to be on the golf course after sunset, or that they also have to have left the clubhouse? If sunset is 9:30pm, how long after that are people allowed to sit in the outside veranda's? What about hours for mowing, collecting range balls, and other maintenance? The concern is over noise and lighting. I feel that this should be clarified to the applicant and the neighbors. Lighting the Driving Range: Also listed under the "Lighting" section is "Lighting for the driving range is currently being evaluated and the information should be available shortly." Again, they imply that this is already acceptable and assume they can light the driving range and operate year round. There is no reason to light a driving range that is open from sunrise to sunset. Private Road Usage and Easement Rights : The state highway to the west and county road to the north are addressed, but not the private road to the south. This golf course has been under construction for 2 years, and the applicant's have been using the private gravel road that boards the south side of this property on a regular basis during the construction time. This is not part of the Halla Greens property. The people with properties on this road (including myself) have easement rights. I believe this road is on property owned by Tom & Kathleen Gertz and Dave Teich. I would like to clarify in writing first, that there is to be no public access to the golf course via this road, and second, whether the golf course entity has any legal easement rights to use this road for construction or maintenance purposes. Doesn't the golf course entity have to have easement rights to use this road? This is the same road that MN DOT refers to in its letter dated November 23, 2005, in which they say "If Halla Greens is using the gravel access road, they must apply for a Mn/DOT access permit." Have they applied for a permit? The wear and tear on this gravel road increases dramatically with heavy truck usage, especially in the spring and fall when ground moisture is high. Water Runoff Onto Neighboring Properties: The applicant has added an elevated dirt berm on the south side of the property that abuts the private gravel road. There is no ditch between the birm and the road, and so with this design, water runs off from the birm directly onto the gravel road surface. This was done late in 2005, and my concern is that this will lead to an increase in water on the road surface which results in potholes and increased maintenance costs. This should be corrected, as there shouldn't be additional runoff directed onto the road. Landscaping: The prior proposal included minimum standards and the applicant's proposal for trees and shrubs along the south and east sides of the property (Page 10, Chanhassen Short Course Staff Report, September 2, 2003. The newest documents make no reference to this at all. What happened to them? What is the status of the landscaping plan in this area? Site Plan Map: The site map provided is dated August 2003, and does not show the location of the new buildings or changes to the landscape plans. Where are the training shed and ball washing building to be located? We are well aware that there are acceptable conditional uses of this property, and in the past, we had supported the golf course development as the prior applicant was willing to listen to the neighborhood's concerns and incorporate them into it's design. Apparently, this is no longer the case. The tone and content of the applicant's January 6, 2006 proposal makes it clear that they have no concerns over the neighborhood impact or for city zoning and usage requirements. We realize the city and the commissions hear complaints from neighbors on most zoning issues, but we feel strongly that this proposal goes far beyond reasonable use of this property and is detrimental to the neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration. Dave & Judy Walstad 10071 Great Plains Blvd Chanhassen, MN Page 1 of 1 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Elizabeth Mikkelsen [elizabeth.mikkelsen@zimmer.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 4:08 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: Halla Golf Course Hi Sharmeen — I live on Foxford Road — close to Pioneer Trail, so we are one of the houses that will be most effected by any major developments at the golf course. Can you answer a few questions for me? 1) Since the land on which the golf course is now situated, was originally slated/proposed as a housing development — what is it zoned? I would not think that zoning for a housing development and zoning for a full service golf course would be identical — but can you tell me if this is so? 2) Why is the city allowing a zoning change if the two zoning ordinances are different? 3) What is a "done deal" at this point? The original, non -lighted course, of course, but what else will be non- negotiable? Have other approvals been made or agreements made with Halla of which the homeowners are unaware? 4) No lights were ever approved — it was to be a day -light course only. Yet, as we watched construction of the course and parking lot, we saw wiring/lighting bases being installed. Why was Halla allowed to complete this activity without discussion/permission? Having a full service, 24/7 type of lighting golf course is way beyond the scope of what was originally proposed. To allow for night use/lighting will ruin the ability of homeowners to use our property to the fullest extent. The noise associated with a late night course, the additional traffic that a lighted course will draw; the light pollution and the inability of homeowners to see their own night sky will truly detract from home values and quality of life. Why must tax -paying residents have to fight to maintain their quality if life and place of residents. We bought property in this neighborhood so that we could have land and a somewhat rural setting close to Chanhassen. Why is a developer being allowed to undertake a major modification in context and intent? Why did City Inspectors not stop these modifications while they were going in versus having the residents have to fight 'after the fact"? If you could shed some light on this subject — I'd really appreciate it. Any or all help you can provide would be great. Thanks so much Elizabeth Smith Mikkelsen 9591 Foxford Road Elizabeth Smith Mikkelsen Director, Clinical Affairs Zimmer Spine 952-830-6306 phone 952-857-5656 fax 952-837-6906 efax elizabeth.mikkelsen@zimmer.corn 2/7/2006 Page 1 of 1 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Jimhautman@aol.com Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 11:04 AM To: Al.laff, Sharmeen Subject: halla meeting Attachments: ATT37818.bd Sharmeen, My name is Jim Hautman, I live at 11095 great plains blvd., on the southern border of the halla golf course site. Unfortunately I will be unable to attend the meeting tuesday, and was hoping to voice my opinion by email. I live and work at home and see daily the illegal dumping of trash etc. from Halla nursery[ see photos, obtained legally]. the dump site is just feet away from my property and so the trash evetually washes onto my property. Since the start of the golf course it is now also the golf course dump site. I'm afraid next it will also be a restaurant dump. I know you have tried to stop them and I appreciate that. I just want to reaffirm it's continuing, and if there is anything I can do to help you stop it, let me know. I am also opposed to lights at the course, I was assured by Ron Saatzer when he was involved that it would be daylight hours, no lights. Besides there is already a lighted range a mile away. I am opposed to many other things Halla nursary does, but I feel these two have the biggest negative effect on the neighborhood and the environment. Thanks for your time, I hear only good things about you and your work. Jim Hautman 2/7/2006 Page 1 of 3 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Weread4fun@aol.com Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 2:18 PM To: A -Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: Halla Greens February 4, 2006 To Sharmeen Al-Jaff and the Chanhassen City Council: I am writing with regard to the planning commission's staff report concerning Halla Greens. I live in the white colonial house directly behind Dave and Judy Walstad's home and have owned my land for almost a dozen years. Over these many years, I have seen how disrespectfully Don Halla treats the neighbors on this side of Pioneer Trail and how he creates his own rules to suit his wishes, no matter what we and the City of Chanhassen have to say. Though Halla Nursery's big trucks use the access road in front of our homes many times daily during the growing season, he has never once offered to help repair the ruts left by his heavy machinery. In fact, he has claimed that he has a right not to be responsible, since he was here first. He continues to dump loads of waste from Halla Nursery an average of once a day during the summer into the ravine near Jim and Dorothy Hauptmann's home despite being asked numerous times by the city and the neighbors to stop. Is this legal? Though I was optimistic about the Chanhassen Short Course when it was initially proposed by Ron Saatser and Don Halla, and spoke in favor of it in 2003 at a city council meeting, I am very concerned with the site plan amendments and variances he and John Kosmas have now proposed. Those items and my concerns are listed below. First, in the initial plans that were approved in the fall of 2003, there were four items of profound importance to the neighbors: 1. Hours of operation will be seasonal, limited from sunrise to sunset. 2. No outdoor speaker system is permitted. 3. No commercial kitchen shall be permitted in the clubhouse. 4. No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety lights. 1. I do not believe the hours of operation should be changed from what were initially proposed. They should be limited to seasonal use from sunrise to sunset, and strictly enforced as originally agreed to. The land is zoned for agricultural use, and while running a golf course fits within these guidelines, the extended hours and year-round operation proposed by John Kosmas sound more like a commercial restaurant/business use than an agricultural use of land. 2. I would like to reiterate that there should be no outdoor speaker system. (Halla Nursery already has one of these that we can hear on warm and breezy days.) 2/7/2006 Page 2 of 3 3. The original (2003) intent of not permitting a commercial kitchen was because the primary use of land was as an executiveo! course. Ron Saatser explained his dream of creating the course so that children, teenagers and families could enjoy the game of golf. The clubhouse was simply a place to buy a Coke on a hot day or grab a snack or a sandwich. It was not supposed to be a restaurant with screened porches that served as a business in its own right, encouraging people to stay well after their round had finished. If patrons leave at 11 pm, it is reasonable to believe that employees will be cleaning up and closing around midnight. As neighbors, we find this unacceptable because the new amendments and variances Halla and Kosmas have applied for are not minor changes, but major differences in the way the operation would be run. Neither Halla or Kosmas have approached the neighbors (as Ron Saatser did) to gather our input. 4. I strenuously object to any exterior lighting, except one or two lights fastened to the buildings for safety reasons or a maximum of three safety lights, not to exceed fifteen feet tall, no matter how large the Halla Greens parking lot is. Just as granting the extended business hours in the variance will "be considered an annoyance to the neighbors in the early morning and evening hours contrary to the original use permit," so will these lights be considered an annoyance. Not only will they be a source of light pollution and change our views, but this is in direct violation of the initial agreement in 2003.1 am also concerned that if you allow Mr. Halla to add lights, he will push to have longer hours. I believe the city needs to be very firm with Mr. Halla regarding this point or we will end up with a lighted parking lot and the additional lights he has mentioned for his driving range and miniature golf course. This is more in line with the look of an amusement park or a car sales lot in front of our homes, rather than the golf course we envisioned! Again, this smacks more of commercial zoning which is not approved for this area rather than the agricultural zoning which is. John Kosmas has already referred to the use of outdoor lights after dark for the benefit of the patrons of the restaurant and, by remaining on all night, to prevent vandalism. This is unacceptable. This has more to do with property protection than safety. Mr. Halla does not have bright lights on daring the night at his Nursery, and this is something I have told him repeatedly how much we and the other neighbors appreciate. I understand having a few lights for safety, but if the golf course opens at dawn and closes at dusk, there should be no need for fiuther lighting. Finally, I am concerned about the current gravel road that borders the golf course. This is the road we neighbors use to access our property. We were told in 2003 that this road would not be used by golf course patrons or for maintenance, yet the orange construction fabric meant to be a buffer between the course and the road was removed so heavy machines could access our road during construction. Once again, Mr. Halla pushed past the boundaries set by the City and the good faith agreement we had in going forward with the creation of the golf course. Since Eric Olson has been in charge, this has improved, however, we still have had to spend money to repair our road several times and I had to fix my car's tie rod when it was impaired due to the road's damage from the golf course equipment. This is the road Mr. Halla's nursery trucks use to reach the ravine for dumping. What is to stop him from dumping the waste from his golf course there as well? Since the Halla tree lot no longer exists, I believe there is no valid reason for Halla trucks to utilize this road any more. It is meant to be an easement for my neighbors and me, not a commercial road. If it is within your jurisdiction, I would like you to agree there should be no use of this gravel easement for any Halla business use whatsoever. (As far as we know, the "current business use" is entirely for access to the golf course and to access the ravine for dumping.) Based on Don Halla's years of disregard for the rules and guidelines from the City of 2/7/2006 Page 3 of 3 Chanhassen, pertaining to the dumping and to the original conditional use permit for the golf course— you may know of others—I am very concerned that he will continue to push the limits in every way possible. Please examine how Halla Nursery has grown over the years and consider the way the Chanhassen Short Course has grown into the proposed extravagant plan for Halla Greens ---complete with a miniature golf course, lighted parking lot (with 104 spaces), more outbuildings (with plans for expansion already mentioned), then use all the resources at your disposal to limit Halla Greens impact on the neighbors and the environment. Thank you. Sincerely, Gaye Guyton 10083 Great Plains Blvd 952-445-1034 2/7/2006 11. Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville MN 55113-3174 February 6, 2006 Sharmeen AI-Jaff City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Halla Greens Mn/DOT Review #S05 -103A SE Quad of TH 101 and Pioneer Trail (CSAR 14) Chanhassen, Carver County Control Section 1009 Dear Ms. AI-Jaff: FEB 0 2006 CITY CF CHVNASSE1V Thank you for the opportunity to review Halla Greens. Mn/DOT's staff has reviewed the site plan and has the following comments: Surface Water Runoff A Mn/DOT drainage permit shall be required. A grading plan depicting the correct Right of Way lines is needed. The City or project developer will need to submit before/after hydraulic computations for the 100 year rainfall event verifying that all existing drainage patterns and systems affecting Mn/DOT right of way will be perpetuated. In addition, please submit information documenting the performance of the pond located at the northwest corner of the golf course (located immediately East of the Hole #9 green). Drainage runoff rates to Mn/DOT right of way for the proposed condition must not increase over the existing condition, and drainage patterns must not change. Please direct questions regarding drainage issues to Bryce Fossand (651-634-2408) of Mn/DOT's Water Resources Engineering Section. Design For liability reasons, steps should be taken to insure that errant golf balls do not enter the TH 101 Right of Way, or the TH 101 driving/turning lanes. For questions on this, please call Ken Ljung (651-634-2113) of Mn/DOT's District Design Office. Permits The berm has been constructed on Mn/DOT Right of Way and needs to be removed. Mn/DOT has had major drainage problems (flooding) on TH 101 due to this berm. As mentioned earlier, a drainage permit is required. Any use of or work within or affecting Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/tecsui)/utility. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. An equal opportunity employer County State Aid Highway (CSAH) Requirements As a reminder, CSAH 14 is a County State Aid Highway (CSAH) Route. Any work on a CSAH route must meet State Aid rules and policies. • http://www.dot.state.mn.us/stateaid/ shows or has links to the applicable forms and the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual. • Refer to the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual, Chapter 5-892.200 for information regarding standards and policies. • Please go to http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/arule/8820/ for information regarding State Aid Operations Rules Chapter 8820. • For driveway standards, the designer is directed to refer to the Mn/DOT Road Design Manual (English) Table 5-3.04A and Figure 5-3.04A for guidance and policies. Please contact Jim Deeny in our State Aid section at (651) 582-1389 with any additional questions. Please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Reviews Coordinator Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's review and response to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions concerning this review please contact me at (651) 634-2083. Sincerely, Jonathan OsrnPlanner rw Transport Enclosures: Mn/DOT letter dated November 23, 2005 Copy: John Freemyer, Carver County Surveyor Roger Gustafson, Carver County Engineer Kevin Norby, Herfort Norby Golf Course Architects, Eden Prairie, MN John Kosmas, K.K. Design, Minneapolis, MN Mn/DOT Review #505-103A 2 2/6/2006 Copies to Mn/DOT Metro Division files: Mn/DOT Division File C.S. 1009 Mn/DOT LGL File - City of Chanhassen Copies distributed via Groupwise: Tod Sherman Cindy Carlsson Buck Craig Soosan Nichols Ken Ljung Bryce Fossand Lynn Clarkowski Ann Braden / Metropolitan Council Roger Gustafson Carver County Engineer 11360 Highway 212 West P.O. Box 300 Cologne, MN 55322-0300 John Freemyer Carver County Surveyor 600 East 4`h Street Chaska, MN 55318 John Kosmas K.K. Design 6112 Excelsior Blvd Minneapolis, MN 55416 Kevin Norby Hefort Norby Golf Course Architects 6452 City West Parkway Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Mn/DOT Review #S05 -103A 3 2/6/2006 BENCHMARK Delivering The Student Experience Technology Training for Business & IT Professionals 0 (t St+oer Cbul?s>`: - Escrow A -'+-O?l CL L2, fby — LC.D 0-7 m VOULxM,E cit �M L2xC3,5A4'j+2,'= 3d' k► _ jbgfj. x 2&S' = /9 9j�C c:r- ILL �I 05.52.3/0003o Cornrnon boy rovV (CV) �rorn mtJooT Pric-e book A-R.EA o -r- E Ekm 3o' -z - - IAF' YaZ. IUB 21oS'x(►s'-t-is' tZ') = ELIEv rK oe. 94/3sU 5575 5 Z31490013 L-�oSIOd. c©ntTY-vL 13LAAlk lAT7�-& kA 3 b I.ItsI V014 Su m �IlAl � 4 �eDSIDtJ COh1s'RU� I103�3a 1S f3Ll I LT 2t SdD'b 0 I0=000 IID°/o=�7,%03 EAST /WEST ELEV. S MAG.L P Al j.1 H-£� EA - BALL BASk YuAt�1( _ PDP tim W A7-A- poP REAR=� .. STEfG Roof Nvu - asw mnl Inu - aml ml°II SOUTH ELEV. SA6L nEsnsNs4Az SAI-/- I FLOOR PLAN SIDE ELEV. Im FRONS E� EV. z� r-1�0= rp3 c:W )ax►o �� SSI N& FLoo A A iI FA c,J,fA R .cc _ STeEL RDOf �- ✓1A/A I-- 5 /DING IEiK - G°DI CpM tAlP �nR. ,nlrr FA P& k, 3 CREEK L10WER5 3 FAIRWA /rx PL M5 1b,Ll 5A)/0 5C)1 -:1 b 5D1 PRODUCT I C a � �.2 TyoLF Y PARTS TAKiAK xnR- I All - PA tl8iGAS PARTS EAST ELEV. T-�— N°ORTO HE LEV. YF TRAClO (8'x10' ROOE2f� )• - ns�uB y o a WI7gE l ING u I — -- ,cXAT1i+ZCR. RAG 19X8 �usH ��er v T vo 1 ti AAA/ 1TRUCK W/ DU P T�RN IUD' , s +GLe3 How6A A� sy Arowf. CAAT5 NAe.H1 4 a SPRA fERT = E/P SATIPt� 0 To" 2 3 Sn R BIujsH ., e o,� S , R FERT LQ SPREAD Rn6 8 ID FERTI JZER ERS FLOOR PLAN N a n� ve- = r- w s o 0 ALL DRAWINGS ON THIS SHEET ARE CONCEPTIONAL TT Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Waters Edge 1500 West County Road &2 Roseville MN 55113-3174 November 23, 2005 Ms. Kate Aanenson Community Development Director City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Subject: Halla Greens Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) Review # S 05-103 Southeast quadrant of Trunk Highway (TH) 101 and Pioneer Trail (CSAH 14) Chanhassen/ Carver County TH 101 Mn/DOT Control Section # 1009 Dear Ms. Aanenson: The Mn/DOT Metro District has reviewed the -above referenced site plan. The following comments need to be addressed in addition to the comments from our letters dated August 26, 2003, and September 2, 2003 (enclosed). Area Engineer comments: • Please provide additional information on the intent of the proposed modifications to the existing gravel driveway, and the use of the existing gravel driveway at the south end of the site plan; off of TH 101. It is not possible to determine from the plans submitted whether the existing gravel driveway has been moved to be located opposite from Halla Nursery Drive, as shown in the 2003 plan. Please provide additional information concerning the location of the gravel driveway. The site plan is not clear on the access point from TH 101. The gravel road appears to have a possible connection to the golf course property. If Halla Greens is using the gravel access road, they must apply for a Mn/DOT access permit. For questions on these points, please call Lynn Clarkowski, Mn/DOT Metro District South Area Engineer, at (651) 634-2103. Right of Way Office comments: We are enclosing a copy of Mn/DOT right of way plat number 10-34 for your information. The developer needs to refer to this plat in site plans and other related drawings, so that Mn/DOT's existing right of way is accurately identified and labeled. The site plan submitted to Mn/DOT appears to show the Mn/DOT right of way as it existed prior to the construction of State Project SP # 1009-14. Mn/DOT's right of way is now one hundred twenty (120) feet wide along TH 101 for a distance. There is also a "sight comer" that has been taken by Mn/DOT via condemnation on the southeast corner of TH 101 and CSAH 14. In addition, please depict Mn/DOT access control with appropriate symbolization. For questions on these points, please call Lee Williams, Mn/DOT Metro District Right of Way Office, at (651) 582-1275 An equal opportunity employer ➢ For driveway standards, the designer is directed to refer to the Mn/DOT Road Design Manual (English) Table 5-3.04A and Figure 5-3.04A for guidance and policies. Please contact Jim Deeny in our State Aid section at (651) 582-1389 with any additional questions. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Review Coordinator Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's 30 -day review and response process to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 651-582-1462. Sincerely, 4� 9;'1(-� Mary McNeff Transportation Planner Enclosures — Mn/DOT right of way plat No. 10-34 Mn/DOT letter dated August 26, 2003 Mn/DOT letter dated September 2, 2003 cc: John Freemyer, Carver County Surveyor Roger Gustafson, Carver County Engineer Kevin Norby, Herfort Norby Golf Course Architects, Eden Prairie, MN Water Resources Engineering comments: A Mn/DOT drainage permit shall be required. A grading plan depicting the correct right- of-way lines is needed. The City or project developer will need to submit before/after hydraulic computations for the 100 year rainfall event verifying that all existing drainage patterns and systems affecting Mn/DOT right of way will be perpetuated. In addition, please submit information documenting the performance of the pond located at the northeast comer of the golf course. Drainage runoff rates to Mn/DOT right of way for the proposed condition must not increase over the existing condition, and drainage patterns must not change. For questions on these points, please call Bryce Fossand, at Mn/DOT Metro District Water Resources Engineering, at (651) 634-2408. Traffic Engineering comments: A Right Tum Lane, on Pioneer Trail, for the new access, should be constructed. This is especially important with the traffic signal at TH 101/Pioneer Trail. For questions on these points, please call Lars Impola, Mn/DOT Metro District Traffic Engineering, at (651)634-2379. Design comments: For liability reasons, steps should be taken to insure that errant golf balls do not enter the TH 101 right of way, or the TH 101 driving/turning lanes. For questions on these points, please call Ken Ljung, Mn/DOT Metro District Design Office at (651) 634-2113. Permits comment.— The omments The berm has been constructed on Mn/DOT right-of-way and needs to be removed. Mn/DOT has had major drainage problems (flooding) on TH 101 due to this berm A drainage permit is required. Any use of or work within or affecting Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/tecsM/utility. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. County State Aid Highway (CSAH) comments: As a reminder, CSAH 14 is a County State Aid Highway (CSAH) Route. Any work on a CSAH route must meet State Aid rules and policies. ➢ http://www.dot.state.nm.us/statcaid/ shows or has links to the applicable forms and the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual. ➢ Refer to the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual, Chapter 5-892.200 for information regarding standards and policies. ➢ Please go to hup://www.revisor.leg.state.nm.us/arale/8820/ for information regarding State Aid Operations Rules Chapter 8820. 4 Minnesota Department of Transportation s C Metropolitan Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road 132 Roseville, MN 55113 August 26, 2003 Sharmeen A]-Jaff Planning Department, City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Chanhassen Short Course, Mn/DOT Review #S03-039 SE Quad of TH 101 and Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, Carver Co. Control Section 1009 The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above referenced site plan. Please address the following issues before any further development- As evelopmentAs you may be aware, Mr"T has an intersection improvement project at TH 101 and Pioneer Trail scheduled for October 2004. This project will be acquiring right of way from the southeast quadrant of the intersection, which will affect the proposed golf course. in addition a temporary easement will also be needed from approximately 650 feet east and south of the TH 101 and Pioneer Trail intersection. L. T _ nud dcv _ uvu, si,cei 3 of the pian sei for the goii course shows proposed landscaping in areas where MwWT will need construction easement These planting should not be installed until after the intersection reconstruction or they should be moved outside of the area Mn/DOT will need for construction casement. Please contact Geoffrey Prelgo Mn/DOT Design Engineer, at (651) 634-2355 with questions regarding this issue. ■ -For liability reasons, the city or developer should ]rrstall netting along TH 101 at the 8°i hole to prevent golf balls from entering the highway. ■ A Mn/DOT Drainage permit is required. Drainage computations for the pond in the northeast comer of the golf course near hole nine must be submitted to determine the off-site drainage entering the construction project. Please contact Martin Korthank, Water Resources Engineer, at (651) 634-2077 with questions regarding this issue. A Mn/DOT Access permit will be required for the new access onto TH 101. Mn/DOT would also recommend that the golf course have an east -bawd right tum -lane off of Pioneer Trail. • Any use of or work within Mn/DOT right of way requires a pemrit. Two Mn/DOT permits will be required for this development. Please direct questions regarding permit applications to Keith VanWagner (651-582-1443) of Mn/DOrs Permits section. ■ Please send a copy of the final plat for Mn/DOT review to the following address: David Torfm Mn/DOT—Metro West Surveys 2055 N. Lilac Drive Golden Valley, MN 55422 Phone: (763) 797-3113 An equal opportunity employer Asa reminder, Pioneer Trail is County State Aid Route 14. Any work on a 6SA1Iroute must meet State Aid rules and policies. Also, the County must review any changes to its County State Aid system so that they stay within its system limitations. Please note that CSAH 14 is Carver County's jurisdiction and the County must have the opportunity to review and comment on the development as well. You may obtain additional information regarding State Aid rules and policies in any of the following ways: ➢ http://vvivw.dot.stite.mn.us/statcaidl shows or has links to the applicable fomu and the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual. ➢ Refer to the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual, Chapter 5-892.200 for information regarding standards and policies. ➢ Please go to htip://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.ustanile/8820/ for information regarding State Aid Operations Rules Chapter 8820. D For driveway standards, the designer is directed to refer to the Mn/DOT Road Design Manual (English) Table 5-3.04A and Figure 5-3.04A for guidance and policies. Driveway widths, other than those recommended, up to 50 feet will be permitted only by special permission of the Commissioner of Transportation or designee. Please contact Jim Deeny in our State Aid section at (651) 582-1389 with any additional questions. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Paul Czech Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require thret (3) complete copies of plats o copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's review and response to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions concerning this review please feel free to contact me at (651) 582- 1378. Sincerely, rigid Gombol Senior Transportation Planner Copy: Roger Gustafson / Carver County Engineer John Freemyer / Carver County Surveyor Ron Saatzer / Owner Herfort Norby.Golf Course Architects Sathre-Berquist, Inc. Blind Copy: Lars lmpola David TorSn Jim Deeny Keith VanWagner Ann Braden Lynn Clarkowski Geoffrey Prelgo Martin Korthank Mn/DOT LGL File — Waconia Q Minnesota Depanment of Transportation 8 Metropolitan Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 September2, 2003 Kevin Norby Herfort Norby Golf Course Architects 6452 City West Parkway Eden Prairie, MN 55344 SUBJECT: Chanhassen Short Course, MVWT Review #S03-039 Follow up SE Quad of TH 101 and Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, Carver Co. Control Section 1009 Mn/DOT's initial review of this development indicated that a net should be installed for liability reasons, as stated in our August 26, 2003 letter. Mn/DOT was not requiring this as a stipulation of development but instead more a recommendation. After further discussion with the developer Mn/DOT would like to review the site upon completion and make a determination at that point whether a net would be warranted or not If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (651 ) 582-1378. Sincerely, C3 Brigid Gom Senior Transportation Planner Bhnd COPY Mn/DOT Division File — CS 1009 Mn/DOT LGL File- Chanhassen M equal opportunity employer City of Chanhassen Planning Commission P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attn: Sharmeen January 25, 2006 Geneva & Jeff Sorum 9900 Deerbrook Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)403-1190 Dear City of Chanhassen Planning Commission: We are writing in support of the Halla Greens Golf Course expansion proposals set before the Planning Commission. Our property is adjacent to the course and we have been able to see firsthand the results of work that has been completed to date. We are impressed with the work that has already been done and support further expansion plans of the buildings, especially in the case where these plans would further enable the business to be successful. '*We trust the City Planning Commission, Mr. Halla, and his business partner(s) to further plan with appropriate consideration to the effects of our property, the neighborhood and the city as well. Please keep us up to date where you deem our input to be important. Sincerely, Geneva and Jeff Sorum RECEIVED JAN 2 7 2006 CIN OF CHANHAS%N vu t•14• LUUJ J•JUrm h P UCO1U11 11U•UJ JU r, 0/J HIM t .r Grading Plan M ❑ Ch onh asaen �"r"r"� Short C Dura e rsurr �u.w uosr� .�� I I I I I Oy^hm av4 �ti 0��� �e+aMn rYnq �� POwr � •���5`i��iiSti \ 1 \\ = `►\\ HIM t .r Grading Plan M ❑ Ch onh asaen �"r"r"� Short C Dura e rsurr �u.w uosr� .�� I I I I I Oy^hm av4 �ti 0��� �e+aMn rYnq �� POwr � •���5`i��iiSti City Council Meeting — March 20, 2006 lighting plan as shown in the staff report. The height of the light pole may not exceed 15 feet. All light fixtures must meet ordinance requirements. All lights with the exception of the light located in the center island of the parking lot and the club house soffit lights, shall be shut off one hour after sunset. 10. The applicant/owner/lessee shall apply pesticides only when needed. Use products that are most effective, target specific, and present the least hazards to people, wildlife, and the environment. 11. A retail pro shop is permitted within the clubhouse. Retail operations shall not occupy more than 20% of one floor. Retail sales are limited to food, beverages, and golf -related items. 12. Hours of maintenance operation shall be limited to Civil Sunrise to Nautical Sunset" All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 3 to 0. "Councilman Peterson moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council approve an amendment to Site Plan Review 2003-7 SPR — Planning Case 05-39, for the construction of a Club House, a Maintenance Building, a golf ball washing building and a lean-to for a golf course as shown in plans dated received January 6, 2006, with the following added conditions: I. Applicant shall increase landscape plantings to meet minimum requirements for parking lot trees. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the City and approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. Applicant shall fully screen parking lots from adjacent roadways through the use of bemring or increased landscaping. 3. The applicant must submit detailed architectural plans for the maintenance building, golf ball washing building, and lean-to that meet the design ordinance requirement. 4. Comply with all conditions of the MnDOT review letter dated November 23, 2005. 5. The temporary 120 square -foot octagon building may remain on the site for a time period not to exceed six month after City Council approval and must be removed within two weeks after a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. The building shall be located in the parking lot. 6. The applicant is responsible for obtaining and complying with MnDOT and Carver County permits and approval on any grading that takes place along the north and west side of the property. 7. All disturbed areas are required to be restored with seed and mulch within two weeks of grading completion. 21 City Council Meeting —March 13, 2006 Councilwoman Tjomhom: Right, you have to go home when you're done golfing. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, you can lounge a little bit but pretty much that's the intent and that's the same condition that ... a curfew that while they're golfing in the winter then it's not intended to be a club house or you know some other type of establishment. That it's really ancillary to the primary use which is the golf. So it's an opportunity to visit. Meet the pro, whatever but it's really intended to be part of the same, not a separate commercial type use. But it's related to golf. And that was the recommendation for not, for denying and not extending the hours. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Right. Mayor Furlong: Any other questions? Councilman Peterson, any questions at this point? Councilman Peterson: You know one of the things Kate was that we were originally intending to put lights on the building. Was the building in a different spot originally so that we were going to off light the parking lot with off the building? I mean I assume it would be because right now it wouldn't really be possible would it? Kate Aanenson: It would be difficult. I mean you could put them in the soffit over the door the way the. Councilman Peterson: But if we did that, the lighting would be more intrusive to the neighbors than it would with down lighting now right? Kate Aanenson: Right. I mean if you put it, if you put in under the soffit here, it would provide lighting just for that door otherwise yeah, you're right. It would be the height of the building at 27 feet, if you put somewhere, could be higher. Councilman Peterson: And you're going to put spots and it's just going to be a glaring thing in the night. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, and those tend to be, that is a nuisance, the calls that we get sometimes when a business goes next door that we have to work to get it shielded and pointed down. And then you might not get the park, or the area for protection that we're talking about before in the parking lot. Councilman Peterson: What kind of discussion did you have with the applicant regarding the maintenance building more than doubling in size? I'm confused by that. I don't know whether you've had any discussions or we can ask the applicant the same thing. Kate Aanenson: Sure. Well I think you know we always try to find that proportionality to say, if this is intended to be related to the golf course, it seems excessive for that size of a course and we kind of looked around to see what other size of maintenance buildings and it just seemed in excess of what you would need for this golf course. So we recommended that it be significantly smaller. 45 RIGHT OF WAY IN SECTION 25 PARCEL OWNER LOCATION . T.H.� AZIMUTH DRAINAGE RRAIIN EASEMENT TEMPORARY EASEMENT EXPIRES ON PEPoUNENT INTEREST 54 FT. (YORE OR.L.SS) 23 ROGER ALAN LEE SW1/4 NW1/4 1176271 5515 Property Lyne 12-01-10FEE o Cast Iron Monument DISTANCES SHOWN TO FEET (66, 80 ETC.) ARE EXACT VALUES. PERMANENT CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS TO Section Line AZIMUTH R/W Parcel Number 3 Quarter Line B32 B33 Access Control Sixteenth Line - - a o Access Opening Property Lyne B3 o Cast Iron Monument OPEN L- a R/W Boundary _ R/W �- Existing D.O.T. R/W Line 88010'12" 21n. x 2 In. D.O.T. Iron Tube with Cap__ And Other Rood R/W 196.70 3/•I" D.O.T. Iron Pin o' Railroa--- N., R.23 Other Iron Monument 3009'35" Private aseR/W -- Pr (vote Easement - - - _ -- - _ Concrete or Stone Monument ° Temporary Easement E__ _ _ _ _ T Ri'W Boundary Corner - Building Removal Easement - B. R, E. A 10 10 DISTANCES SHOWN TO FEET (66, 80 ETC.) ARE EXACT VALUES. PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT FROM TO DISTANCE(FT> AZIMUTH 83 B32 20.00 358010'12" B32 B33 35.00 88010'12" B33 B4 20.00 178010'12" ON PROPERTY LINE CARVER COUNTY COORDINATES X=558482.298 Y=168086,768 NAD 83(1996) HARN L CAST IRON MONUMENT AT QUARTER CORNER CITY SW1/4-NW1/4 PROPERTY L N N 0- a w 2625 T. E. PAR. 211 4 T. E. PAR. 20 N -+ C.S.A.H. 14 R/R m EASEMENT PER ---e. DOC 054584 ---B1 0 _ 831 PARCEL 20 PARCEL 217 ' - -- - - NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHC - 620.00' 89606'41 EASEMENT PER DOC 087073 -- B3Qo R/W C.S.A.H. NO. 14 '60' TREE CONSERVATION EASEMENT ---- PER DOC 0193915 HALLA z J 0 0 J 3 GREAT NW1/4-SWI/4 i V W N C7 N U.1 d U Of Cr Q Q a r W Z MW O� wa ¢. w N M M M m m m- - m BLOCK 1 Q0 �1P BLAINS ADDITION ao 0 N N N� O , B7 I B10 BLOCK 2 Ll 7 SE1/4-NW1/4 rn I I N LAKE X ' Q ,el 4 , , RILEY B61 O Z BLOCK 1 WOODS PLAT BOUNDARY DATA FROM TO DISTANCE(FT) AZIMUTH B1 B2 IN THE 295.93 84052'33" B2 B3 I ' 97.00 88010'12" B3 B4 W., 35.00 88010'12" 84 B5 it 811 196.70 56°25'53" 85 86 N., R.23 495.21 3009'35" B6 B7 OF THE 346.92 357043'17" B7 82206 C 264.87 13°58'49" A 268.46 R 473.02 DEL 32031'05" RT 82208 82209 25, 113.25 89°34'31" 82209 810 C 267.79 198°21'05" A 273.66 R 380.02 DEL 41015'37" LT B10 B11 u 559.92 177'43'17" Bil B12 C 328.92 179020'57" A 328.96 R 5789.62 DEL :015'20" RT 812 B13 165.84 123654'34- B13 814 424.73 89024'21" B14 B15 35.36 179037'27" B15 B16 e 51.35 179'37'27" B16 B17 444.00 269°37'27'• B17 B18 C 29.87 261008147" A 29.88 R 412.03 DEL 4009'17" LT B18 B19 134.92 227055'08" B19' B20 62.19 183001'20° B20 B21 C 435.11 204°01'5011 A 445.01 R 606.84 DEL 42001'00'' RT 821 B2222 190.00 225002'20"' 82222 B2223 120.00' 315002'20" B2223 B24 190:00' 45002'20" 624 B25 C 349.06 24°01'50" A 357.01 R. 486.84' DEL 42°01'.00" LT 825 826 53.55 3001'20" B26 B27 48:22 312°16'15" B27 B28 163.00 269°19'54." 828' B29 40.00' 359019'54" 829 B30 391,92 269°19'54" B30' B31 65.68: 359031'11'' 831 Bi 47.57 359031'117.- ON PROPERTY LINE CARVER COUNTY COORDINATES X=558482.298 Y=168086,768 NAD 83(1996) HARN L CAST IRON MONUMENT AT QUARTER CORNER CITY SW1/4-NW1/4 PROPERTY L N N 0- a w 2625 T. E. PAR. 211 4 T. E. PAR. 20 N -+ C.S.A.H. 14 R/R m EASEMENT PER ---e. DOC 054584 ---B1 0 _ 831 PARCEL 20 PARCEL 217 ' - -- - - NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHC - 620.00' 89606'41 EASEMENT PER DOC 087073 -- B3Qo R/W C.S.A.H. NO. 14 '60' TREE CONSERVATION EASEMENT ---- PER DOC 0193915 HALLA z J 0 0 J 3 GREAT NW1/4-SWI/4 i V W N C7 N U.1 d U Of Cr Q Q a r W Z MW O� wa ¢. w N M M M m m m- - m BLOCK 1 Q0 �1P BLAINS ADDITION ao 0 N N N� O , B7 I B10 BLOCK 2 Ll 7 SE1/4-NW1/4 rn I I N LAKE X ' Q ,el 4 , , RILEY B61 O Z BLOCK 1 WOODS 5 PINEVIEVI COURT 3RD CHANHASSEN Mr1l0oT oRIGStNA-t_. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. I0-34* CONTROL SECTION (( i fr , IN THE 1 ; ` OF THE SOUTHWEST I ' It i 10' TRAIL EASEMENT T.116 N., R.23 W., PER DOC °102577 T. E. PAR. 23 QUARTER OF THE it 811 QUARTER OF SECTION _ J N., R.23 W., '- 20' TRAIL EASEMENT 10 OF THE f- o PER DOCS 053553 & 058790 SECTION 25, T.116 N., R.23 W., IN THE X W 3 OF THE , I ' QUARTER OF SECTION 25, T.116 N., R.23 W.. CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Q I I 11 u I � 23 ACCESS I� C3 .I I V I o11.1 v v I 85 �': e 812 �� Q Al�l it 5 PINEVIEVI COURT 3RD CHANHASSEN Mr1l0oT oRIGStNA-t_. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. I0-34* CONTROL SECTION NO. 1009(101=187)902 IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, T.116 N., R.23 W., IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, T.116 N., R.23 W., IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, T.116 N., R.23 W., IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, T.116 N., R.23 W.. CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA * AMENDS PLAT 10-22 FOR PARCEL 23 ACCESS CONTROL THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION IS HEREBY DESIGNATING THE DEFINITE LOCATION OF TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 101 FROM 1/4 MILE NORTH OF C.S.A.H'. rYQoo 14 TO 1/8 MILE SOUTH OF C.S.A.H. 14 IN THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN as shown on this plat prepared by the State of Minnesota Department of Transportation Is hereby cert If led as the official plat of that portion of sold T.H. 101 within the designated portion of Section 25 and the Commissioner's order therefor, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 160.085, section 1.60.14 subd. 1, section 161°.16 subd. 2, andsection,161.18. It Is further ordered that it is necessary to acquire all trees, shrubs, Crass and herbage within the right of way of said Trunk Highway, and to keep and have the exoluslve aontro of the same. Commisstoner'a Order No. Location Nature of Interest 88516 PLAT 10-34 Definite location, width, access, permanent dreirPe age easement and temporary easement Certified , Carol Mal g Commtss n by harmI_Taheblam ' J Date �� .Director of Program Delivery -Metro District I hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the Laws of the State of Minnesota ) that this plat meets requirements of Minnesota Statutes, are an 160.085, section 160.14 subd. 1, section 161.16 subd. 2, andsection161.18, that paroel ownerships are can described and delineated on the plat, and that the proposed right-of-way boundary Iines are Corr 4ly designated on the plat. Certified by '-= t''"'�0 '-�•- -5� ►57 5/04h= Keith A. Crocker License No. Date Mn/DOT District Office I hereby certify that this plat was surveyed by me or under my direct supervision and that I am duly Lloensed Land Surveyor under the Laws of the State of Mlnnesotcj that all oeasurements are correctly shown on this plat, that.aII monuments have been correctly pIcoed as shown on thIsipIat, that Certificates of Location for the monumented Pubt10 Land Survey corners as shown on this plat are on file in the County Recorders Office f required and r Min ea a Statutes, sect ton 160.15) and/or the County Surveyors Office. Cart tfled by f�o3yS 59....a�.; race S. Wetherbee License No. Date Mn/DOT District Office C ADDITION 2 I 1 E. A , 20' TRAIL EASEMENT PARCEL 23305'- - - - - - PER DOCS 053553 & °58790 EAST -WEST 1/4 L _ m R/W --`- 1285.33' 89°06'41• ------ NOT TANGENT PIONEER TRAIL TO CURVE o -a3,- PARCEL 24: 0, -� 828 ° j Y N E. PAR. 24 'L~ -, Z _ 81 0 ( U 825 cc 1: jla- B20 2 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT a si PER HALLA GREAT Q s Q PLAINS ADDITION- Q 1.4 ti -r T.E. PAR. 25 Ll ]B1 4 B15C.$. A. H. NU. 14 ' - 3399.96269°06'41" 616 - T.E. PAR. 25 CSAH 14 R.•W PER DOC 0107443 ) BLOCK 1 2 PERIWINKLE TRAIL NE1/4-SW1/4 HALLA GREAT PLAINS ADDITION (NOTE: PORTIONS VACATED AS PER DOC •273961) 7 N CAST IRON MONUMENT AT QUARTER CORNER SCALE IN AZIMUTH ORIENTATION AND GRID CONVERSION Plat azimuths are oriented to the County Coordinate System with 0 degrees 0 minutes 0 seconds being "GRID NORTH". Plat distances are ground lengths. SURVEY STANDARDS 1. The plot values, azimuths, and distances are based on the County coordinate system. 2. The boundary monuments shown on this plat have been field checked for location. The standard deviation for the monument position Is 0.10 foot. 3. The county coordinates shown on one monument are based on ties to national control monuments. 4. For details of this survey contact the Surveying Section at the Minnesota Department of Transportations METRO WEST- GOLDEN VALLEY Name of Dlstrrct DOC. NO. �} ES'i�jog OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER I AHER EBY OCERTIF`�ITHAT MINNESOTA IS PLAT HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON MAY tol-4 �, 20o5, AT 3 : t5 ?M IN CAB. NO. - PLAT NO. 10-34 rni'I ITv ocr nonco V.J. 1VVJi1V1-101 /JVL RECEIPT CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED OF 690 CITY CENTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 NO. 77018 PHONE: (952) 937-1900 I� DATE Q I WTA n7 v MIA 114,111M Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Central Region Waters - 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106-6793 Telephone: (651) 772-7910 Fax: (651) 772-7977 September 5, 2003 KevinNorby Herefort Norby Associates 6452 City West ParkwaySCP _ Q 2003 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 CITY OF C' f NHASSEN RE: Water Appropriation Permit Requirements; City of Chanhassen Dear Mr. Norby; I understand that you are in the process of designing or developing a new 9 -hole golf course in the City of Chanhassen. You asked me to explain Department of Natural Resource (DNR) permitting requirements relating to water appropriation for such golf courses, and how we would handle any problems with neighboring private wells. I further understand that irrigation of the golf course would probably be accomplished from a well drilled into the Jordan aquifer. First, let me explain that you must obtain a permit to drill such wells through the Minnesota Department of Health. You would apply for a water appropriation permit from the DNR only when you plan to pump more than 10,000 gallons per day or 1 million gallons per year from such wells. Typically, we need to see a copy of the well log and the test pumping results before we can make decisions on DNR appropriation permits. So far, we have had no significant problems with water use conflicts in the Chanhassen area. No permits have been denied to appropriate from the Jordan aquifer in this area. However, with the rate of growth, such problems are possible in the future. If a water use conflict occurred, golf course irrigation is considered a nonessential use and you would be ordered to cut back or cease pumping if you were affecting any other users. Anyone who thinks his or her water supply is being affected by your appropriation can file a well interference complaint with the DNR. The forms and detailed information on this process can be found at our web site at: http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waterstwaterm2mt section/aDmomiations/interference html If the DNR finds that you are interfering with a neighboring domestic well, you will be required to either restrict your appropriation or to negotiate a reasonable settlement with the domestic well owner. I hope this answers your questions. If not, please contact Area Hydrologist Julie Ekman, at 651-772-7919. Sincerely, Z)C14101 1�� Dale E. Homuth Regional Hydrologist V City of Chanhassen / Julie Elonan, Area Hydrologist DNR Information: 651-296-6157 • 1-888-646-6367 • TTY: 651-296-5484 • 1-800-657-3929 An Equal Opportunity Employer Printed on Recycled Paper Containing a Who Values Diversity 10 Minimum of 20% Post -Consumer Waste SeP-15-03 11:56A NORBY/KAWELL 9529420197 P-03 oceP 1G euua lu:le aUr'SIl?DD ROSENE ANDERLiK 651E ;1311 p.2 �oneatrw. Poarns. MbrIW .w.P A.wUu.a. Irw ra T AffUwslhe Kllon/EOwI PPPerIw11V fmPblrel $onestroo And Bnpbave Ownrtl I{tosene prin.p JF: Onof Mgq.nn, Pf . N•r,ln1 ServNn nF • GlenrR CnuY -F •nonny! t.nunl rt, rC. M1ryA Rnan.rn rr •14.SA Naowl 1•.E. %nderlik be S<Iue GOMWIfOrL KM:Ort l(! /CSe. !. FL • Jcefpn t.A NFMG Pt • N4M 1 k tome[ rY • SWb M fy rl n. [l.n. j a Nonar< Frlpnpnr RNIn A GnrAIV\ FE . gook,, Y PlvlrMr. FF Pltn.nd w r...yr, PF gsriQ J LoNuta. rE. Jl `SSociates Krnx 1 Vwb a,fr Pr • i W K 6<i0, or r Centre,. P nnd..t P.E. • Nah R PMI% Pr . On j Al Be vlaoa, M B A Wdj F YnMAmuvr PF, 1 f . Ary %K nyl7. M .A, . PJLYr PICT M"lfl. P`. • 1 hems. W P.I.rtnn, 2 Enyineels fi Architects "'nel K 9alirb.l" . Ftl10tX 1fnKn, YF • L IMryIY Gr+.cl III. PC . J.arM 1, k'Nuertvn. YR • Ivnapl Mage.ec Ft . fMma. n user Pf cne!nnn I boor. w. • OnI. A r•oan, rr. • Thom. A, frim . Pn Rneeu nern F Pr OI/lees: Sr. P,r.n, s: Cbuf, 1cnl,e.:n nrm 1Pnl...w.. MN • F•IBwwlen. VA • 6ru wu. It j %1t CA111:.vrw POr%Gflr40 CGm $epte bcr 12, 2003 i vin 3. Norby and Associates, Inc. 452 C ity West Parkway den ljrairie, Nhnnesota 55344 1 i gear tic Norby, i We have reviewed your request for information regarding the approval mocess of Minnesota Departinent of Natural Resources (DNR) in regards to the planned imgatiun well fur the Thanh4scn Short Cuurse. T'he following is a summary of the DNR review process and possibileoutcomes of this review process. When water well is planned w withdraw over 10,000 gallons per day (or 1,000,000 gallons er ye ), it meets the DNR's definition of a high capacity well_ 'The DNR controls the •t#ng process for high capacity wells in the State of Minnesota. is a summary of what the DNR investigates when granting this well permit y, what an extensive hydrogeological study would entail. hen a DNR is reviewing a request to install a high capacity well. they generally look for o pcitential adverse impacts that could result from pumping this well_ The fust would be pumpi¢g tntetfcrence with other nearby wells. Pumping interference occurs when the discharge of water is great enough as to cause the water level of the aquifer to be temporarily 1 3wered, in the vicinity of the pumping well. Tf other nearby wells completed in the same quifei have their pumps set near the top of the wwcr table in the aquifer, there is a potential Mal primping des new high-capaeiry well could cause the water level in the nearby well:l to larop blow the pumps, effectively rendering those wells "dry." J possible impact the DNR may investigate is whether pumping from this high - well is affecting any nearby unique natural features, such as wetlands, trout streams, eous fens that art: fed by groundwater. 11 a nearby natural featurt is found to rely On titer m maintain a healthy eco -system, the DNR may determine that a nearby high - well could adversely impam this natural feature. 2335 West Highway 36 P St. Paul, MN 551131 651-636-46001 Fax: 651-636-1311 Sep -15-03 11:56A NORBY/KAWELL 9529420197 aep le eUU3 16:1e BG- -STROO ROSENE ANI)ERLIK Sir 51311 CUFLCIUCI their review. the DNR researches locally available information about the aquifer this case, the Jordan Sandstone). Information is studied regarding historical aquifer water els, any available aquifer pumping tests from nearby wells, and the location of any nearby 1s in the same aquifer. Predictive calculations may he made by the DNR to estimate how :h mwdown" would occur in the aquifer with the proposed well pumping over an .ndc J period. the DNR dors not identify any nearby wells or natural features that wound be impacted by is hicapacity well, they will generally grant the permit for the high-capacity well without y Pur er review. Also, if the DNR does note nearby wells or natural reaiures, but does not edict he new well will have an adverse impact on these features. the DNR will generally ant th well permit. where nearby wells or natural features may be adversely impacted, the DNR usually that the party applying for the well permit conduct a more extensive hydrugeological order to obtain a pumping permit. When requested by the DNR, a hydrogeological study is used to more accurately predict what iri pact a pumping well will have on the surrounding aquifer. While the level of effort i olved to complete this study depends on what the DNR tequests for each unique ci�tum nce, the following is a summary of typical steps involved in conducting a study. )rdei to effectively predict the influence of a high-capacity plumping well, the best tool to clop this prediction is to conduct a pumping test within the atptifer. This test is conducted pun-t{?ing water fturu either an existing nearby high-capacity well or a newly constructed well. During this test pumping, water levels arc measured in the pumping well and any rby vailable tnonirnring wells. These monitoring wells can consist of existing domestic Is. Aisting irrigation wells, existing municipal wells, or newly cunstnrcled wells designed the �urpose of data collation. s of the data collected in this pumping test are used to calculate the yield of the d the measured distance -drawdown caused from the pumping well. This data then Bred into a computer-generated groundwater model or a simUar predictive program : the amount of influence the pumping well will have. This data is then supplied to who ultimately decides if the predicted level of impact from this well is acceptable rosed location, to conduct the data collection and analysis for a typical hydrogeologieal study can tween $15,000-$25,000, depending on what level of effort the DNR requests to the study. This estimate does not include costs involved with drilling a teat well (or tg wells) for use in the pumping test. Typically, a 6 -inch diameter test well can cost while 2 -inch diameter monitoring] wells can cost $10,000 each. P.04 P-3...__._ Sep -15-03 11:56A NORBY/KAWELL 9529420197 P.05 Sep 12 ZUU3 16: 12! BQ'-&TROD ROSEME ANDE=RLiK 651.' 51311 I i p.4 be noted that the completion of the aquifer pumping test and analysis does not that the DNR will ularnarely grant the high Capacity well permit. : DNR makes the ultimate decision on whether to grant a high-capacity well permit, owner is still held rMpunsible for any adverse impacts caused from pumping this L can he proven that a high capacity well is drying out nearby wells or is adversely 9 natural features of interest, the well owner is the responsible party required to either e problem and/or cease pumping from the high capacity well. any further questions, please contact us at (651) 636-4600. W. Poster, Y.1:_ C Principal and Associates, Inc. WN N MEMORANDUM CITY OF SPIE Phone: 952.227.1140 CIIHl1I]f1JSEN To: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager 7700 Market Boulevard e.html Park & Recreation PO Box 147 From: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner Chanhassen, MN 55317 The golf course must obtain a permit to drill such wells through the Minnesota Recreation Center Administration Date: September 12, 2003 Phone: 952.227.1100 1,000,000 gallons per year. Typically, the DNR needs to see a copy of the well Fax: 952.227.1404 Fax: 952.227.1110 Re: Update on Short Course Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 On September 8, 2003, the City Council reviewed and tabled action on this Fax: 952.227.1190 application. Questions were raised regarding the commercial well and its impact Engineering on surrounding property. Staff did some research and the following is our Phone: 952.227.1160 findings: Fax: 952.227.1170 er Senior 52.22 .11 Phone: 952.227.1125 Source: Letter from Dale E. Homuth, DNR Regional Hydrologist and DNR WEB Finance SPIE Phone: 952.227.1140 When a high capacity well is pumping, a portion of the aquifer around it is Fax 952.227.1110 http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/water-mg!i2t section/appropriations/interferenc e.html Park & Recreation water if water levels are lower than well pump. This condition is referred to as Phone: 952.727.1120 "well interference." Most well interference problems tend to be localized and Fax: 952.227.1110 The golf course must obtain a permit to drill such wells through the Minnesota Recreation Center Department of Health. The golf course will also have to apply for a water 2310 Coulter Boulevard appropriation permit from the DNR since they intend to pump more than Phone: 952.227.1400 1,000,000 gallons per year. Typically, the DNR needs to see a copy of the well Fax: 952.227.1404 log and the test pumping results before they make decisions on DNR Planning a appropriation permits. Natural Resources Phone x:952, .27.1110 Fax: 952.227.1110 Anyone who thinks his or her water supply is being affected b the golf course Y PP Y� g Y commercial well appropriation can file a well interference complaint with the Public Works DNR. 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 WELL INTERFERENCE RESOLUTION PROCESS er Senior 52.22 .11 Phone: 952.227.1125 Introduction Fax: 952.227.1110 When a high capacity well is pumping, a portion of the aquifer around it is Web site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us P dewatered in a pattern known as a cone of depression. ression. Wells located within the cone of depression may experience lower water levels and have problems getting water if water levels are lower than well pump. This condition is referred to as "well interference." Most well interference problems tend to be localized and short in duration, but being without water is a major inconvenience and can cause damage to well pumps. Some problems can be resolved by lowering the pump in The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding hails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Todd Gerhardt September 12, 2003 Page 2 the well or installing a new well pump, but in some situations it may be necessary to construct a new water supply well. Minnesota Statutes 103G.261 establish domestic water use as the highest priority of the state's water when supplies are limited. Procedures for resolving well interferences are defined by Minnesota Rules 6115.0730. Domestic well owners and municipal water suppliers that have problems obtaining water and believe the situation is due to the operation of a high capacity well that pumps in excess 10,000 gallons per day or one million gallons per year can submit a well interference complaint to the Department for investigation. However, before the Department will investigate a well interference complaint the well owner must have the well inspected by a licensed well driller to determine if the water supplyproblems are related to the condition of the domestic well. Process 1. Contact your Area Hydrologist (40 kb) to request a Water Well Information and Complaint Questionnaire, or download the questionnaire (200 kb) from this page. 2. Submit the completed Water Well Information and Complaint Questionnaire to the appropriate DNR Regional Office for your county. A licensed well driller is required to complete parts B, C & D of the questionnaire. 3. The Regional Hydrologist will evaluate your complaint and determine whether an investigation is necessary. 4. Some investigations require that an aquifer pumping test be performed. The high capacity well would be pumped and water levels in the domestic well(s) involved in the complaint and possibly other wells in the area are measured to determine the extent of any well interference. 5. Aquifer test data and/or other information will be analyzed and a determination will be made regarding the existence and extent of the interference. 6. If the Department determines a well interference condition exists, the permitee will be required to perform one or more of the following actions within 30 days of notification: a. Request a modification or restriction of the permit in order to provide the affected well owner with an adequate domestic water supply. b. Negotiate a reasonable agreement with the affected domestic well owner(s). c. Request a public hearing. HYDROGEOLOGIC STUDY Engineering staff contacted Jon D. Peterson, with Bolton and Menk, Inc. The following are his comments regarding the hydrogeologic study: Based on my conversation with Teresa on Wednesday, we have developed an estimate for providing a hydrogeologic study for a proposed development. The intent of this study would be to determine the potential impact a new well, constructed in the Jordan aquifer, may have on existing residential wells in the vicinity. This study could be accomplished in one of two ways- Todd Gerhardt September 12, 2003 Page 3 1. A "paper" study could be conducted. This study would involve obtaining existing well records and geologic information in the study area, developing a conceptual hydrogeologic model, and performing an interference analysis. The estimated cost for such a study is $3,000, and the time frame is 24 weeks, depending on availability of existing well data. 2. The "paper" study outlined above could be expanded to include collection of field data for verification of model assumptions. This field data would include monitoring of existing well water levels and pumping rates, and test well pumping data (from the test well for the proposed water supply well). Depending on the size of the final proposed well, the test well could be constructed such that it could then be converted to the final supply well, pending the results of the hydrogeologic study. The estimated cost for such a study is $13,000 (not including test well construction), and the time frame is estimated to be 4-8 weeks. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS OF GOLF COURSE DEVELOPMENT Mr. Rusty Fifield with Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. was directed to perform Fiscal Implications of Golf Course Development. In a memo addressed to Kate Aanenson, Mr. Fifield wrote: This memo discusses the financial implications of development options for the Chanhassen Short Course project. This analysis assumes that the site could be developed with the following options: 1. Four housing units without municipal sanitary sewer and water. 2. Fifty-four housing units with municipal services. 3. Golf course with a club house. The analysis compares the estimated revenues generated from development alternatives in three areas: property taxes, permit fees and utility charges. In addition to the assumptions contained in the table, the analysis relies on the following factors: • City property tax rate: 30%. • Sanitary sewer lateral connection charge: $4,513. • Water lateral connection charge: $4,513. • Sanitary sewer trunk hookup charge: $1,440. • Water trunk hookup charge: $1,876. The housing values reflect the form of development anticipated on this site. The values for the golf course are based on a review of other comparable facilities. It must be noted that the values Todd Gerhardt September 12, 2003 Page 4 for the housing option with municipal services reflects future development. Services are expected to reach this area within ten years. At that future date, the average value per unit and the city's fee structure should be higher. This inflation will make total revenues greater than shown in the table. RECOMMENDATION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT "The City Council approves Conditional Use Permit 2003-4 for the construction of a golf course with a club house as shown in plans dated August 25, 2003, with the following conditions: 1. Hours of operation shall be seasonal and limited to sunrise to sunset. 2. No outdoor speaker system shall be permitted (individual pager systems are permissible). 3. No commercial kitchen shall be permitted in the club house. There shall be no cooking equipment permitted on the premises with the exception of a microwave oven, pizza/toaster oven, etc. The intent of this condition is to put the golf course operator on notice. The proposed septic system design does not allow for any cooking grease to be disposed through the system which will cause the system to fail. 4. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit is contingent upon approval of Site Plan Review 2003-7. 5. Soil tests must be performed at least once a year. Results of all soil testing must be submitted to the City of Chanhassen. In addition, annual reports detailing all applications of fertilizer (including nutrient content for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium; application rate in pounds per acre; date of application; and total quantity of fertilizer applied) must be submitted to the City of Chanhassen. No fertilizer containing phosphorus may be applied unless the soil test results demonstrate a deficiency in phosphorus. 6. No grading, disturbance or dumping shall be permitted in areas designated as bluff or in bluff impact zones. Runoff from cart paths, fairways, greens or tee boxes on Hole 3 shall not be directed into bluff impact zones or bluff areas. 7. On-site grading may not increase the rate or volume of runoff downstream from the site or onto adjacent properties. 8. The applicant shall enter into a conditional use permit with the city. 9. No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety light." SITE PLAN REVIEW Todd Gerhardt September 12, 2003 Page 5 "The City Council approves Site Plan Review 2003-7 for the construction of a Club House and a Maintenance Building for a golf course as shown in plans dated August 25, 2003, with the following conditions: 1. Approval of the Site Plan Review application is contingent upon approval of Conditional Use Permit 2003-4. 2. All trees to be preserved must be protected by tree protection fencing. Fencing must be installed prior to grading. 3. No vegetation may be removed within the bluff impact zone. 4. The applicant shall provide a pedestrian/bikeway connection to the City's trail system at the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Pioneer Trail. 5. Fire Department Conditions: a. Please contact the Building Official and Fire Marshal to discuss the sprinklering requirements for the clubhouse and storagetmaintenance building. b. If a Fire Hydrant is available, a 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Qwest, Excel Energy, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. c. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs and yellow curbing will be required. Please contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of signs and curbs to be painted yellow. d. The builder must comply with Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division regarding maximum allowable size of domestic water on a combination water/sprinkler supply line. This is only if a sprinkler is required. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division Policy #36-1994. e. The builder must comply with the Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division regarding premise identification. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention division Policy #29-1992. L A post indicator valve will be required on any building that will have a sprinkler system. g. Submit radius turns and dimensions to City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 6. Building Official Conditions: a. Submit a detailed floor plan of the clubhouse so the occupancy classification and fire suppression requirements can be determined. b. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. c. An accessible route must be provided to all facilities on the site. Todd Gerhardt September 12, 2003 Page 6 d. Submit a design of the on-site sewage treatment system for review and approval. Two sites must be provided and these sites must be protected from damage prior to beginning any construction activity on the site. The system must comply with the requirements of Minnesota Rules 7080.0600. e. Detailed occupancy related requirements cannot be reviewed until complete plans are submitted. U The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review, permit procedures and fire suppression options. Engineering Department Conditions: a. Staff recommends that Type I silt fence be used along the northwesterly and southerly property lines. The applicant should be aware that any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. All disturbed areas are required to be restored with seed and mulch within two weeks of grading completion. b. Add the following City of Chanhassen Latest Detail Plates Numbers: 5201, 5203, 5207, 5300, and 3001 c. The applicant is responsible to obtain and comply with all regulators agency permits. d. On the grading plan add a bench mark. 8. The applicant must submit detailed architectural plans for the club house and maintenance building that meet the design ordinance requirement. 9. The applicant shall enter into a Site Plan Agreement and provide financial guarantees to insure compliance with the project. 10. Only one (1) monument sign may be permitted on the site. The total sign area shall not exceed twenty-four (24) square feet of sign display area, nor be more than five (5) feet in height. 11. The applicant is responsible to obtain and comply with MnDOT and Carver County permits for the new access. 12. Per MnMT's review memo, dated September 2, 2003, the need for a net along TH 101 will be evaluated upon completion of the golf course. If it is determined that a net is needed, then the applicant will be required to install it. 13. A hydfogeologie study shall be eempleted an the golf eaufse site fe show that thefe will be no impaet te the suffeunding we The applicant shall comply with all DNR Water Appropriation Permit requirements. (The DNR examines a copy of the well log and the test pumping results before they make decisions on DNR appropriation permits.) 14. Comply with all conditions of the Carver County review letter dated 8/29/03. Todd Gerhardt September 12, 2003 Page 7 15. Comply with all conditions of the Mn/DOT review letter dated 8/26/03." ATTACFIMENTS 1. 103G.261 Water allocation priorities. 2. 6115.0730 WELL INTERFERENCE PROBLEMS INVOLVING APPROPRIATION. 3. Memo From Mr. Rusty Fifield dated September 12, 2003. Todd Gerhardt September 12, 2003 Page 8 Minnesota Statutes 2002. Table of Chapters 103G.261 Water allocation priorities. (a) The commissioner shall adopt rules for allocation of waters based on the following priorities for the consumptive appropriation and use of water: (1) first priority, domestic water supply, excluding industrial and commercial uses of municipal water supply, and use for power production that meets the contingency planning provisions of section 103G.285, subdivision 6; (2) second priority, a use of water that involves consumption of less than 10,000 gallons of water per day; (3) third priority, agricultural irrigation, and processing of agricultural products involving consumption in excess of 10,000 gallons per day; (4) fourth priority, power production in excess of the use provided for in the contingency plan developed under section 103G.285, subdivision 6; (5) fifth priority, uses, other than agricultural irrigation, processing of agricultural products, and power production, involving consumption in excess of 10,000 gallons per day; and (6) sixth priority, nonessential uses. (b) For the purposes of this section, "consumption" means water withdrawn from a supply that is lost for immediate further use in the area. (c) Appropriation and use of surface water from streams during periods of flood flows and high water levels must be encouraged subject to consideration of the purposes for use, quantities to be used, and the number of persons appropriating water. (d) Appropriation and use of surface water from lakes of less than 500 acres in surface area must be discouraged. (e) The treatment and reuse of water for nonconsumptive uses shall be encouraged. (f) Diversions of water from the state for use in other states or regions of the United States or Canada must be discouraged. Todd Gerhardt September 12, 2003 Page 9 Minnesota Rules. Table of Chgters 6115.0730 WELL INTERFERENCE PROBLEMS INVOLVING APPROPRIATION. Subpart 1. For new applications. If the commissioner determines that an adequate supply of water is available and that the proposed project is reasonable and practical as determined based on parts 6115.0670 and 6115.0680 to 6115.0720, but that there is a probable interference with public water supply well(s) and private domestic well(s) which may result in reducing the water levels beyond the reach of those wells, the following procedures shall apply: A. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining and providing to the commissioner, available information including depth, diameter, nonpumping and pumping levels, quality, and well construction details for all domestic and public water supply wells located within the area of influence of the proposed appropriation well. B. The commissioner may require aquifer tests or other field tests to be conducted. C. The commissioner shall determine the probable interference with the domestic and public water supply wells based on theoretic computations using available information regarding the aquifer characteristics obtained from aquifer tests and/or from hydrologic studies, and the probable effects of lowering the water levels in the domestic and public water supply wells due to the proposed appropriation in the area. For public supply wells only the probable interference with that portion which is used for domestic water supply is considered. D. The commissioner shall provide the prospective appropriator with an evaluation of the nature and degree of effect of the appropriation on the water levels of the domestic well(s) and public water supply well(s). E. The commissioner shall not issue the permit until the applicant agrees to exercise any of the following options within 30 days after written notification by the commissioner: (1) accept a modification or restriction of the permit application to provide for an adequate domestic water supply; or (2) submit a written agreement signed by the applicant and all parties identified under item C as having probable interference. Such agreement shall outline the measures that will be taken to ensure maintenance of water supplies to such identified parties to the extent that would have existed absent the proposed appropriation. In cases where no agreement can be reached, the commissioner shall implement the settlement procedure identified in item D. Subp. 2. For existing permits. If complaints are made to the commissioner by private domestic well owner(s) or public water supply authority regarding the effects of a water appropriation on the domestic water supplies, the following procedures shall be followed: Todd Gerhardt September 12, 2003 Page 10 A. The commissioner shall provide complaint forms to the parties making the complaint, thereafter referred to as "complainant." B. Upon receipt of the completed complaint forms the commissioner shall notify the permittee, the applicable watershed district, and the soil and water conservation district and any other governmental agency or person who may be affected or has expressed interest in the complaint. C. The commissioner shall investigate and assess the complaint by: (1) Analyzing and evaluating the submitted complaint forms, hydrologic facts and characteristics of the water supply systems involved. (2) Requesting additional facts from the complainant(s) and the permittee when necessary. In order to assure that available data on domestic well(s) are provided, the complainant shall cooperate with the permittee in providing such facts as may be available and allowing the commissioner access to obtain necessary available facts. If the complainant does not cooperate in providing available facts or allowing the commissioner access to the domestic well(s), the commissioner shall dismiss the complaint. (3) Conducting, if necessary, a field investigation. (4) Additional hydrologic tests and evaluation shall be required if hydrologic information is unavailable or inadequate to make a determination of necessary facts in the matter. For irrigation appropriations, the timing and conduct of such tests shall be in accordance with the provision of Minnesota Statutes, section 103G.271, subdivision 3, relating to modifying or restricting appropriation for irrigation. (5) In evaluating the probable influence of the water appropriation on the domestic well(s) and public water supply well(s) the commissioner shall consider whether the domestic well(s) provides a dependable water supply while meeting the appropriate health requirements for the existing use of the affected well. For public water supply wells only the probable interference with that portion which is used for domestic water supply is considered. D. Where adverse effects on the domestic well(s) are substantiated, the commissioner shall notify the permittee of the facts and findings of that complaint evaluation. In the event that the commissioner determines that the domestic water supply is endangered the commissioner shall, pursuant to part 6115.0750, subpart 7, unless a temporary solution is worked out, restrict or cancel the appropriation until such time as a decision has been made by either negotiation, settlement, or hearing. E. The permittee shall within 30 days after written notification by the commissioner take appropriate action by exercising any of the following options: Todd Gerhardt September 12, 2003 Page 11 (1) Requesting the commissioner to modify or restrict the permit in order to provide for an adequate domestic water supply. (2) Negotiating a reasonable agreement with the affected well owner(s). If no agreement is reached, the settlement procedure outlined in subpart 4 shall apply; or (3) Requesting a public hearing. Subp. 3. New domestic wells installed after appropriation permits have been issued. In the event that new domestic wells, exempt from permit requirements, are installed in area of adequate ground water supplies where permits have been issued for appropriation the following shall apply: A. It shall be the responsibility of the prospective new domestic well owner to ensure that the new domestic well will be constructed at adequate depth so that it will provide an adequate domestic water supply which will not be limited by the permitted appropriation. B. Holders of valid permits for appropriation of water in areas where adequate water supplies are available shall not be responsible for well interference problems, involving new domestic wells exempt from permit, when such exempt domestic wells are installed subsequent to authorized appropriation. Subp. 4. Settlement. If the applicant or permittee and the complainant(s) have been unable to negotiate a reasonable agreement pursuant to subparts 1, item E and 2, item E, the following procedure shall be implemented: A. The applicant or permittee shall submit to the complainant a notarized written offer including a statement that the complainant must respond in writing to the commissioner within ten days from the receipt of the offer either accepting the offer or explaining why it is rejected. The offer must be submitted to the complainant with a copy to the commissioner within 40 days after the receipt of the written notification provided in subparts 1, item E and 2, item E, based on the following: (1) If an existing domestic well provides an adequate domestic water supply which meets state health standards, and such well no longer serves as an adequate supply because of the proposed or permitted appropriation in the vicinity the applicant or permittee shall be responsible for all costs necessary to provide an adequate supply with the same quality and quantity as prior to the applicant's or permittee's interference. (2) If an existing well provides an adequate domestic water supply but does not meet state health standards and such well would no longer serve as an adequate supply because of the proposed or permitted appropriation in the vicinity, the applicant or permittee shall be Todd Gerhardt September 12, 2003 Page 12 responsible for that portion of costs of providing an adequate water supply, but shall not be responsible for those costs necessary to bring the domestic well(s) to state health standards. B. The complainant shall, within ten days from the receipt of the notarized written offer, respond to the commissioner in writing either accepting the offer or making argument on why the offer is not reasonable. If no response is received from the complainant, within the time limit, the commissioner shall dismiss the complaint. C. If the offer is not accepted, the commissioner shall make a decision based on the written offer and arguments and available facts, within ten days as follows: (1) that the applicant or permittee has submitted a reasonable offer, the commissioner shall issue or continue the permit involved; (2) that the applicant or permittee has not submitted a reasonable offer, the commissioner, after notice and opportunity for hearing, shall deny, modify, or terminate the permit involved; (3) that there is a need for a public hearing in which case it is ordered. STAT AUTH: MS s 103G.315; 105.415 Current as of 11/13/02 MEMORANDUM Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. To: Kate Aanenson From: Rusty Fifield Subject: Fiscal Implications of Golf Course Development Date: September 12, 2003 This memo discusses the fmancial implications of development options for the Chanhassen Short Course project. This analysis assumes that the site could be developed with the following options: 1. Four housing units without municipal sanitary sewer and water. 2. Fifty-four housing units with municipal services. 3. Golf course with a club house. The analysis compares the estimated revenues generated from development alternatives in three areas: property taxes, permit fees and utility charges. In addition to the assumptions contained in the table, the analysis relies on the following factors: • City property tax rate: 30%. • Sanitary sewer lateral connection charge: $4,513. • Water lateral connection charge: $4,513. • Sanitary sewer trunk hookup charge: $1,440. • Water trunk hookup charge: $1,876. The housing values reflect the form of development anticipated on this site. The values for the golf course are based on a review of other comparable facilities. It must be noted that the values for the housing option with municipal services reflects future development. Services are expected to reach this area within ten years. At that future date, the average value per unit and the city's fee structure should be higher. This inflation will make total revenues greater than shown in the table. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55401-1659 Ph (612) 338-0800 Fx (612) 338-6838 www.hkgi.com Direct (612) 252-7133 Email rusty@hkgi.com UNK WHI LK rdX•0J1-L70-u44J otv 10 U0 lu•on r. uzzw Minnesota Dpartment of Natural Resources septembcr 14, 2003 Kevin Norby Herefort Norby Associates 6452 City West Parkway Eden Prairie, MN 55344 .500 Lafayattc Rmid St. Paul. Mill"moin 55135-40 RE: Water Appropriation Permit Requirements: City of Chanhassen Dear Mr. Norby, It is my understanding that your client is planning to appropriate ground water from a well for irrigation of a nine -hole golf course and the City of Chanhassen Councif is requiring your client to perform a hydrogeologic study to investigate ground water availability and the potential for well interference. A ground water study can be anything from a review of existing information to a detailed analysis of field data, including aquifer testing_ The following explains what the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) will require of your client if they plan to appropriate ground water for irrigation purposes. As Regional Hydrologist, Dale Homuth indicated in his letter to you dated September S. 2003, a Water Appropriation Permit will be required from the DNR if your client plans to pump more than 10,000 gallons per day, or 1 million gallons per year. I would direct your attention to the DNR Waters web site for copies of the application and a general explanation of the application process: htto://www.dnr.state.mn-uslwaters/waterm-qmt section/appropriations/permits html In addition to the general requirements, your client will be required to submita map or air photo showing the locations of all domestic wells within a 1.0 -mile radius and all production wells within a 1.5 -mile radius of the irrigation well. In addition to the map/photo, your client should collect and submit well information for all domestic wells within a one (1) mile radius and all production wells Within a 1..5. mile radius of the well site (a copy of the domestic well information sheet is attached for your covenience). DNR staff has performed a rudimentary search of the Minnesota Geological Survey's County Well Index (MGS-CWI) and have identified 181 domestic wells and six (6) production wells in a nine square mile (3 sections by 3 sections) area centered on the golf course site. Based upon this information it appears that the majority of the domestic wells in the area are completed in glacial sediments or the first.bedrock aquifer, the Prairie du Chien formation. Note that the "County Well Index", generally contains wells. recently constructed and does not contain many wells constructed before 1980. Therefore, it is necessary to visit potential domestic wells in the field and not rely solely on County Well Index. It is my understanding that your client has not yet drilled a well. Given the apparent number of nearby domestic wells completed in the glacial deposits or Prairie du Chien formation, consider drilling the production well into a deeper aquifer system such as the Franconia -Ironton -Galesville (FIG) Sandstone, -It is generally accepted that the FIG is hydraulically disconnected from the overlying Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer system. Pumping from a production well completed in the FIG would not be likely to impact water levels in the domestic wells completed in the overlying DNR Information; 651-296-6157 1-888-646-6367 7PY_ 651-296-5484 • 1-800-657-3929 An Equal Opportunity Empluytr Printed un Recycled Paper Containim, a - Minimum of 104 Post -Consumer waste LANK WH ILK rdX•bJl-L7b-V44J JCF 1J VJ lu•4u r.uD/ur formations (note the MGS-CW I search did identify several wells completed in the Franconia formation). Once your client has submitted the well log for the production well and the above referenced domestic well information, DNR may require aquifer testing of the well. The need for an aquifer test will be based upon the source aquifer to be pumped, the requested pumping rate, and the number, proximity and depths of neighboring wells. The purpose of an aquifer test is to evaluate the potential impacts the appropriation may have on the source aquifer, surrounding wells, and if appropriate, nearby surface water features. DNR would identify any nearby wells that should be monitored during the aquifer test. Generally the permittee or their agent conducts the aquifer test. I have enclosed an example of the aquifer test requirement for your review. Be aware that your client may be required to drill an observation well for use during the aquifer test and any long-term water level monitoring deemed necessary after the test. If you have any questions about the domestic well information or aquifer testing requirements, please contact meat 651-296-0517 or via e-mail at Jay, FrischmanP_dnr.tstate mn us. If you have any questions about the permitting process, please contact Area Hydro 772-7919. logist Julie Ekman at 651- Sincerely, Jay R. Friaohman, P(; Hydrogpologst Ground Water Unit Cc: Brian Rongltsch, Supervl5ol' Jllllo Ekmen; Area Hydrologist Teresa Burgess, City of Chanhassen Chanhassen Short Course September 8, 2003 Page 10 PARKING The ordinance requires 20 parking spaces plus 1 space for each 500 square feet of floor area in the principal structure. The total parking spaces required are 25 spaces. The applicant is proposing 80 parking spaces. BLUFF No grading, disturbance or dumping is permitted in areas designated as bluff or in bluff impact zones. Runoff from cart paths, fairways, greens or tee boxes on Hole 3 should not be directed into bluff impact zones or bluff areas. WETLANDS No wetlands exist on site. LANDSCAPING The applicant has submitted a landscape plan for the golf course. Landscaping requirements include parking lot landscaping and buffer yards along all property lines. Requirements are as follows: Landscape item Required Pm sed Parking lot landscape 3,142 ft.2 landscape area > 3,142 ft. ldscp area Buffer yard B — 30' 13 overstory trees 13 overstory trees width 6 islands/peninsulas 6 islands/peninsulas The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for parking lot landscaping. Landscape item Required Proposed Pioneer Tr. 10 overstory trees 10 overstory trees Buffer yard B — 30' 21 understory trees 21 understory trees width 31 shrubs 31 shrubs East Property Line 7 overstory trees 7 overstory trees Buffer yard B — 30' 15 understory trees 15 understory trees width 22 shrubs 22 shrubs South Property line 28 overstory trees 40 overstory trees Buffer yard B — 30' 55 understory trees 35 understory trees width 83 shrubs 250 shrubs Highway 101 11 overstory trees 11 overstory trees Buffer yard B — 30' 23 understory trees 23 understory trees width 34 shrubs 34 shrubs AUG -20-2003 17:42 FROM: 763-479-2103 Tr*952 402 9663 P.001,001 BERGERSON - CASWELL INC. Commercial • Municipal • Re0dential Geothermal • Irrigation Submersible R Turbine Pumps Envimnimnial Drillers 1°"r• Weil Drilling, Abandonment & Repair Since 1948 Cenllfed Puny hula&n August 20, 2003 CHANHASSAN SHORT COURSE Mr. Ron Saatzer 9450 Fox Ford Road Chaska, MN. 55318 RE: Information on Water Well Construction 0 CHANHASSEN SHORT COURSE Dear Mr. Saatzer; This letter is to confirm my verbal explanation on how water well's interact with each other. Most water is glacial deposited and rain -water that saturates the ground. With the proposed irrigation well at your golf course, it will have a greater demand than a house well or the common well stated above, Your proposed well will be considered high capacity water well, and to with draw the proposed 300 gpm from a water well we have to drill into the bedrock so we do not effect other water wells in the area and were assured the requested 300 gpm. From your message t was lead to believe the Cities planning commission was not aware of the current laws regulating minerals in the State of Minnesota The State Department of Natural Resources regulate v atcr usage. This means to pump year well at rates exceeding i 0,00000 gaBoa& day or 1,000,000 gallons / year requires approval and permitting from the DNR annually. The construction and monitoring of water wells and the associated rules, is performed and regulated by the Minnesota Department of Health, along with a few delegated programs that have been authorized by the Commissioner of Health. This information can be obtained by reviewing the Minnesota Rules Handbook for wells and borings by the MDH. This is part of the Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4725. If the well you install effects the well operation of other existing water wells already in use, you will be responsible and will have to correct the problem. If you have any other questions relating to this well construction project, or if you would like assistance at other meetings, please do not hesitate to give me a call at (763) 479-3121 Sincerely, BERGERSON=CAS,71, INC. Tim D.Berquam Project Engineer J I l5 1"drW/al V., Maple Platn, MN 35339 (763) 479-311! r=(763)479-21,93 Sep -02-03-10:35A NORBI_.:AWELLV 0Minnesota Departmerd of TransportaDon MetropoNtan VMabn Waters Edge 1$00 Wort County Road W Poon le, MN 55113 Septoubm 2, 2003 Kevin Norby Herfort Norby Golf Course Architects 6452 City West Parkway Eden Prairie, MN 55344 SUBJECT: Chanhassen Short Course, MnfDOT Review #503-039 Follow up SE Quad of TH 101 and Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, Carver Co. Control Section 1009 9529,20197 P_01 OD1 Dt - Mn/DOT's initial review of this development indicated that a net should be installcd for liability reasons, as stated in our August 26, 2003 letter. MaIDOT was not requiring this as a stipulation of development but instead more a recommendation. After further discussion with the developer MnWT would like to review the site upon completion and make a determination at that point whether a net would be warranted or not. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (651) 582-1378. Sincerely, Brigid Gomb Senior Transportation Planner An equal opportunity employer TOTAL P.©2 CARVER COUNTY PARKS Department 11360 Highway 212 West, P.O. Box 330 of Cologne, MN 55322-0330 Public Works 952 Phone - ��yy,,,,..��,,,, � � 4665250 Fax(952)466-522') Phone (952) 466-52OU �ouxty Fax(952)466-5223 1855-M5 www.co.carver.mn.us/parks November 1, 2005 Sharmeen AI-Jaff - Chanhassen Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Halla Greens J,� 0 7 Z06 Request for a Site Plan Amendment Planning Case 05-39 Dear Ms. AI-Jaff: The Carver County Public Works Division has reviewed the request for a site plan amendment for Halla Greens as transmitted to our office by your memo dated October 21, 2005. The request is for an expansion and redesign of a club house that will be located on the property. Carver County Public Works is not opposed to the clubhouse expansion but we are concerned about the location of the proposed parking lot for the clubhouse facility. During the reconstruction and traffic signal installation at the CSAH 14 (Pioneer Trail) and TH 101 intersection in 2005, Carver County Public Works became aware of some differences of opinion between Mr. Halla and Carver County Public Works about the location of the south easement line for CSAH 14 (Pioneer Trail) as it was established in 1989. These differences of opinion are a result of some ambiguities of interpretation of the right of way documents that were signed and recorded in 1989 as part of the CSAH 14 reconstruction project. Carver County's road easement is 100 feet wide, centered on the road as it was constructed in 1989. The north line of the easement is the Lake Riley Woods south plat line. The south line off the easement is located 100 feet south of this Lake Riley Woods plat line. In review of Grading Plan Sheet 2 that was submitted as part of this request for an amendment to the development plan, the north edge of the planned parking lot is shown to be located approximately 92 feet from the south plat line of the Lake Riley Woods subdivision. This would appear to indicate that approximately 8 to 10 feet of the north edge of the parking lot will be located within the roadway easement area. The parking lot cannot infringe into the permanent roadway easement. Letter to City of Chanhassen November 1, 2005 Page 2 of 2 If the City of Chanhassen approves the Halla Greens site plan amendment, the Carver County Public Works Division requests that the City include a condition in the amendment requiring that any further improvements or construction related activities that occur on this development be completed outside the CSAH 14 right of way which extends 50 feet south of the centerline of CSAH 14. Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal and this consideration. If there are further questions regarding this letter, please call me at 952-466-5207. Sincerely, William J. Weckman, P.E. Assistant County Engineer Cc: Don Halla Roger Gustafson, County Engineer ws\... \R&B/General Road Maintenance/CSAH/14/Halla-Cahn Let 110105 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 FAX (952) 227-1110 TO: Campbell Knutson, PA 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter 0 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE JOB NO. 4/13/06 05-39 ATTENTION Sue Nelson RE: Document Recording ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Change Order ❑ Pay Request ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 3/20/06 Restated and Amended Conditional Use Permit 03-04 For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return ❑ For review and comment ® THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return ❑ For review and comment ® For Recording ❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO: John Kosmas, K K Design copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints SIGNED:! Kim euwissen (952) 227-1107 SeAN"D if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA HALLA GREENS- PLANNING CASE NO. 05-39 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #03-04 RESTATED AND AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants a conditional use permit for the following use: For the construction of a golf course with a club house in an Agricultural Estate District. 2. Property. The permit is for property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as follows: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, Block 2; and Lots 1 and 2, Block 3; Lots 1 and 2 Block 4; Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 5; Outlot A; Together with vacated Columbine Trail, vacated Hibiscus Trail; vacated Periwinkle Trail; and vacated Halla Nursery Drive West; all in the recorded plat of Halla Great Plains Addition, Carver County, Minnesota. 3. Conditions. The Conditional Use Permit 2003-4 CUP — Planning Case 05-39 is issued for the construction of a golf course with a club house as shown in plans dated received January 6, 2006, with the following conditions: a. Hours of operation shall be seasonal and limited to Civil Sunrise to Nautical Sunset. b. No outdoor speaker system shall be permitted (individual pager systems are permissible). c. No commercial kitchen shall be permitted in the club house. There shall be no cooking equipment permitted on the premises with the exception of a microwave oven, pizza/ toaster oven, etc. The intent of this condition is to put the golf course operator on notice. The proposed septic system design does not allow for any cooking grease to be disposed through the system which will cause the system to fail. d. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit is contingent upon approval of Site Plan Review #2003-07 SPR. e�a� e. Soil tests must be performed at least once a year. Results of all soil testing must be submitted to the City of Chanhassen. In addition, annual reports detailing all applications of fertilizer (including nutrient content for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium; application rate in pounds per acre; date of application; and total quantity of fertilizer applied) must be submitted to the City of Chanhassen. No fertilizer containing phosphorus may be applied unless the soil test results demonstrate a deficiency in phosphorus. L No grading, disturbance or dumping shall be permitted in areas designated as bluff or in bluff impact zones. Runoff from cart paths, fairways, greens or tee boxes on Hole 3 shall not be directed into bluff impact zones or bluff areas. g. On-site grading may not increase the rate or volume of runoff downstream from the site or onto adjacent properties. h. The applicant shall enter into a conditional use permit with the City. No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety lights which include parking lot lights, soffit lights and drive aisle lights. The height of the light poles in the parking lot and along the entrance driveway (total of five fixtures) may not exceed 15 feet. The remaining light fixtures may not exceed 4 feet in height. All light fixtures must meet ordinance requirements. All lights with the exception of the light located in the center island of the parking lot and the club house soffit lights, shall be shut off one hour after sunset. j. The applicant/owner/lessee shall apply pesticides only when needed. Use products that are most effective, target specific, and present the least hazards to people, wildlife, and the environment. k. A retail pro shop is permitted within the clubhouse. Retail operations shall not occupy more than 20% of one floor. Retail sales are limited to food, beverages, and golf -related items. 1. Hours of maintenance operation shall be limited to Civil Sunrise to Nautical Sunset. 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. 5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: March 20, 2006 0 (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (sS COUNTY OF CARVER ) 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN .LI Ig, Mayor Gerhardt, City Manager h The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this�day of �, 2006, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 I#NotarY =MEUWISSENta 2010 9tphn\2005 planing c es\05-39 haHa greens 0347 site plan amendmeotcup agreementdm Building Inspections C` - CITY OF November 15, 2007 CHMNSEN Dear Mr. Halla: 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 You contacted the City to find out if the Club House at Halla Greens can be open when Chanhassen, MN 55317 the golf course is not in use. Finance Mr. Don Halla Administration 6601 Mohawk Trail Phore:952.227.1100 Edina, MN 55439 Fax:952227.1110 house as shown in plans dated received January 6, 2006, with conditions. Condition a. Building Inspections Re: Halla Greens — Planning Case 03-07 Phone: 952.227.1180 The club house can only remain open when the golf course is open. Fax:952.227.1190 Dear Mr. Halla: Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 You contacted the City to find out if the Club House at Halla Greens can be open when Fax: 952.227.1170 the golf course is not in use. Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 On March 20, 2006, the City Council approved an amendment to Conditional Use Permit Fax:952.227.1110 2003-4 CUP — Planning Case 05-39 for the construction of a golf course with a club house as shown in plans dated received January 6, 2006, with conditions. Condition a. Park Recreation Phone::952.221.1120 stated "Hours of operation shall be seasonal and limited to Civil Sunrise to Fax:952227.1110 Nautical Sunset." Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard The club house can only remain open when the golf course is open. Phone: 952227.1401 Fax: 952.227.1404 If you have any questions, please contact me at 952-227-1134 or e-mail at Planning& saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Sincerely, Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 ✓ Fax: 952.227.1310 Sharmeen Al-Jaff Senior Planner Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227. 1110 gAplan\2005 planning casesx05-39 halla greens 03-07 site plan amendmenflclub house operation.doc Web SNe www.achanhassen.mn.us SCANNED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gnat pinto live, work, and play. F e — a ol><$ I olx5 i �aRodS -c 2 � 9 ;h ,h%h aad 1� S•s�sa� al?'�4s'�1 Pk Y 0 3 P, Loud pn044400,ll Jamez ,hi x,9 3 0 � I,asnW 3 e ro 1 � x i olx9 app, 0 3 3 e O- �x F e — a ol><$ I olx5 i �aRodS -c 2 � 9 ;h ,h%h aad 1� S•s�sa� al?'�4s'�1 Pk Y 0 3 P, 2a 1 Dspe,lser FO p lWa+er M GI CW„e. Dai u15pen5e,^ fade. 1 D' x Stein S+orug� �aAge 13a/ Is Flags Rope Qu S kets 8v[ket$ Pcp/w«+er Tee Mar KerS Mats Gerb«3e Ca 2tc... Scale (�o% O C D' Feer Invoice M Invoice No. DATE SHERI000699 10/12/2005 County of Carver RECEIVED P O Box 69 OCT 14 2005 Chaska, MN 55318-0069 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Make checks payable to: TODD GERHARDT, CITY MANAGER Carver County Treasurer CITY OF CHANHASSEN PO BOX 147, 7700 MARKET BLVD CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 Date Description Amount 10/12/2005 THIRD QUARTER POLICE CONTRACT OVERTIME BILLING Object Amount JUNE 27-OCTOPBER 2, 2005. Ol 201 201 0000 5574 PAY PERIOD 14 -JUNE 27 -JULY 10,47.25 HR5 @$42.00 PER HR $1,984.50 PAY PERIOD 15 -JULY 11 -JULY 24, 49.50 HR5 @$42.00 PER HR $2,079.00 PAY PERIOD 16 -JULY 25 -AUG 7, 28.75 HRS @ $42.00 PER HR $1,207.50 PAY PERIOD 17 -AUG 8 -AUG 21, 37 HR5 @ $42.00 PER HR $1,554.00 PAY PERIOD 18 -AUG 22-5EPT 4, 32.75 HR5 @ $42.00 PER HR $1,375.50 PAY PERIOD 19-5EPT 5-5EPT 18, 35.75 HR5 @ $42.00 PER HR $1,501.50 PAY PERIOD 20 SEPT 19 -OCT 2, 54.75 HR5 @ $42.00 PER HR $2,299.50 5GT JIM OL50N 22 HR5 @ $51.32 PER HR $1,129.04 Total $13,130.54 TOTAL $13,130.54 Submitted by: Sheriff Office Dept. Steve Ryski Prepared by 952-361-1265 Phone # Fund Dept Program Service Object Amount Ol 201 201 0000 5574 $13,130.54 Total $13,130.54 Submitted by: Sheriff Office Dept. Steve Ryski Prepared by 952-361-1265 Phone # 0 Z Z_ It Z t� Z Q U7 J d 11 � D Z Q Z Z O / ry - < `J Q V) LL 108'-0" V W J m 12'-0" 84'-0" 12'-0" Q < Z:) O N (n N Y 34'-0" 16'-0" 34'-0" • U I j °o W N (� ~ X N / - W � = N I • U N 2 Q CO Ir oe � I I � I I � j I � h %s" A oom Ao VES IDLE ---—�I----------- �36" ROOF OVERHANG —-------------- ---------- ----- L --- -------- �I II ❑� � ----- ----------------- I-------------- — ------- I ❑ I HDCP. I I AREA I I I I I toco j CASHIER OFFICE o j I I I g 4/1 48" HIGH WALL N I I — —OPT. FLUSH BEAM — GATE I I / /, �I o\\� O J m I j Lj w I < cn I Z SCISS TRUSSES STD. TRUSSES 6 N C. VAC. I 20 1..� I u- 1..` a LOUNGE a j STORAGE v i w I PRO SHOP j a I v z El COFFEE PREP. OOM 5 ❑ + __ — — _o I Z0' SHOP Z Q w 30'-0" 16'-4 1/2" 6'-4 1/ " 17'-9" 4'-9" 8'-9" � Ln \ � _ cn -- I LuQ cn I 1 N J = M H U N M Z of o 2DOORI ❑ i a ATE I II QI =N N .... ....... UEn � I❑ U 4 I MFG. MONO TRUSSES 00 M WAS 11 MEN FAN I 4 AT 2A O.C. 11I El MFG. MONO TRUSSES R W/ 12" RAISED ENDS PAPER � ' � a, TOWEL G.B. I I DISP. AT 24" O.C. STORAGE o w� 12" RAISED ENDS I I o 0I 1 I COOLER D.F. O O O F.D. I I m I v I -- I I I W I a O O � F.D. I to ❑ I 0 O 0 CONFERENCE ROOM j❑ I ---------U ---- — OPT. FLUSH BEAM PAPER ❑ I I I — I TD SP. FAN G.B. OWEL I 5 I I M RECPWASTE to ao WOMEN I I I I j I I I I I I ❑ I I L— — — — — — — — — 3 i VESTIBULE I 1 I MFG. TRUSSES AT 24" O.C., _ z cnI o m a o I I N o o ---------- — — — ----------- MAIN LEVEL `o N - I O p / l / 1/4" = 1'- 0" NORTH �(\ O O v(O �O\ •.Lo z m W \ w Z Z Z U W N a � m J W W Q ^ lL O N Li W 2 li (n 0 Chanhassen, Minnesota SCORECARD Tabulation Box I . Parcel Sae: 45.9954 apes HOLE PAR BLUE WHITE RED 2,400 sf 1 3 153 137 117 22% 2 3 165 150 130 3 3 133 110 95 4 3 160 141 125 5 3 120 105 90 6 4 310 285 261 7 3 138 123 108 8 4 327 307 274 9 3 110 95 80 TOTALS 29 1,616 1,463 1,274 Tabulation Box I . Parcel Sae: 45.9954 apes 2. Gross Floor oma Clubhouse: 1,440 sl SlomgeNanlenamz 2,400 sf 3. Bulli ing Near %: 02% 4. Imoerwous Surface Near %: 2.4% 5, Parking Area %: 22% 6. Pmjecled Number of Empbyees: 6 T Number of Seals: 30 6. Parking Spaces Requced olal. 25 Handicapped: 4 9. Parking Spaces Pmvided' Tocol: 80 Handicapped'. 4 10. Buiding Heights Clubhouse'. 20 Storage Maintenance Building 2P III o I I ti L--rj I SITE PLAN � eo� HeAorl Nolby GolfCoulse Mdlilegs — Sar hr�Be qu sl Inc „ems Q July 18, 2003 _ LN o n o a a caw: nNwua snco...� arrant 9050 FnN.1 Raa4 .nw. s,ewn,. 15n cgOh QngJx6 �m0.�r��w�ti��. CIvO,asseD. Mkresda 55318 ��n WaY�ta. Mua�vM 55317 0 P 19511002-0m Omw pwriasx,aa�ee'r',im`sny or`tl�, P 19521 4]69000 If 0 ms wen aM it,, �ncew regesgneu ima„ de n,e ga0.wtY of Matan-Ib,p Gdl Cowze Np,t¢tls. �� Use of tivz pan man rmme and-1tl war eY rtdim-"uv can coarse n,mte AUG 2 6 2003 quWoa,r III o I I ti L--rj I SITE PLAN � eo� HeAorl Nolby GolfCoulse Mdlilegs — Sar hr�Be qu sl Inc „ems Q July 18, 2003 _ LN o n o a a caw: nNwua snco...� arrant 9050 FnN.1 Raa4 .nw. s,ewn,. 15n cgOh QngJx6 �m0.�r��w�ti��. CIvO,asseD. Mkresda 55318 ��n WaY�ta. Mua�vM 55317 0 P 19511002-0m Omw pwriasx,aa�ee'r',im`sny or`tl�, P 19521 4]69000 If to to to is %.e W DRAT .2 11 2.2 IS Is }. I 4 4.1 4.3 93.1 79 i I.] 9LT } I 3 2 .8 4S as 2.4 IS 93. 93. f 4.] .6 la a .1 IS 2. 3 es by b.0 he am am b.e ba bs to ba bs he Via 1, a.e a.e a.a a.e a.a b.0 by he as b.e is, by ba as as b.a he I. he he a.d a.0 he b.e as bs is b.e IS b b.l ba bm by by he by by be by he he as he by by We by to b.0 to °d.: IS a.: La by by by by Is 1.1 to ba he to by by by by by by a.l a.z b.s is L. !a by IS a.z ba as he a.e he by as by b.l a.l ba ea °e.1 b.l to a: 0.1 9.1 a.: a.l ba ba as 1.1 b.: to to to aj b.: to as ba b.l ba b.l by b.e a.: 9.1 by IS I.0 to ._ is b.> is ba' to by he a.0 b.d b.l 1.1 b.; b.l b.2 a.3 b.3 b.3 a.2 a.2 a.2 a.2 b2 a.t a.3 03 a.3 a.3 a.t b2 b.2 b.t b.2 02 b2 a3 b.3 a.2 b.2 Ll b.i b.l b.l b2 a.3 b.s a.8 I.6 }.0 }.B }3 a b.3 b.l he a.0 he b.0 ba k1 b.2 a3 b.3 %A IS he he is b.4 IS b.5 IS IS a.6 he he he he Is he IS b.5 is a.6 b.] as a.5 bA IS a3 b.3 he b.5 IS by is 2 }.1 2.2 IS he b.2 b.0 b.0 a.0 b.0 01 b.l a.2 a.51 0.> is a.9 8A N.8 1.1 I. 1.1 .] 2.4 }.3 1.9 .8 a.3 �.! a.d a.0 a.0 0.6 0.5 j a T I A LB 1.1 2 a.� .6 .> .] .8 L2 .9 .e .> ,] 9.0 b.1 b.1 b.3 ba a.e bS b. b.$ I. S�IIR q.9 .] 0.] I.2 75 BS ¢. e. i. 40 A a.3 a.9 i.f 1.t a. a. `s i.e 1I jI 9S a.2 4a.8. s ?.4 ib 2.3 }2 .4 7.6 is Is IS in a.5 a.l °0.0 as he v0A A0 b.0 b2 b.4 he IS IS IS L9 I.6 I.1 as 09 he by he IS }.0 L9 I! a.9 b.9 b.9 b.9 by U I 12 }.e IS 12 b.9 is }.3 2.5 3.] 2.a is is LI is a Is b2 b3 b.0 by 1.0 he to %a a2 %A by he I5 }.e }.3 2.a 2.8 i.. 9.2 U 12 1.6 2.5 }.3 }.2 2.3 Is I2 ?.1 I2 I.1 }.1 %A as 2.e is 1.4 i.] }.1 IS ila 2.3 2.4 1s b.9 he b3 %a by b.0 as he b.0 &I to IS ° 2,3 IS 5.> as 2.4 2.] to is IS }.6 %a to is 2.9 2.] Is IS Is }.9 2.6 1.: he 93.] }.4 as 1.0 IS IS IS 9 b.6 b.f aA a.3 b.2 b.1 by by a.0 to 14 11 b3 b.6 is 3.0 b.3 bb +2 1a 15.9 by a.l hl as bla ', I.t 2 }.z 60 *15 by b.e b.; 1.1 e3 in IL s 3.6 is s.l to i 93542 W DRAT .2 11 2.2 IS Is }. I 4 4.1 4.3 93.1 79 i I.] 9LT } I 3 2 .8 4S as 2.4 IS 93. 93. f 4.] .6 la a .1 IS 2. 3 .2 as 4.8 93.6 2.1 :.2 10 b.] b.3 b.2 12 ba LI 9L.t a.l by b.0 a IM %,.B IS }.9 10 aS IS a.3 a2 to 01 a.0 he as 15 12 22 1.1 is 13 $.1 1, he to b.0 b.0 by -ie 3s 1a is I. he b3 %a as by by as as byPR2417-M is ko in 9. he 1, IS 1.6 93.1 1.2 as 1.6 °3a 1 1, 3a 1.5 to Is °.i.2 933 1.2 In IS 1.2 am 13 432 1a 3.9 %A 3.3 is a.6 he &I a.l is a.a am 9.0 ke L S' DIRECT as ki to a a.a is 2.1 2.4 am is 935 2s 2.9 is ?.6 °2.• }.3 la is 1.6 %A Is 1.2 is 1.9 }a W i.1 to Is }2 }.5 p.5 a.2 t1 a.l 9da he a.0 0.0 a.0 as 1.1 a.2 a.4 bs Is I.9 25 5a }a W is 12 L: L is }.4 a2 &1, }2 Is la Le 1.1 Is }s }s }3 }.] ?a $__ b a.4 b2 as b.: by to by he I^s j as a.e b.: b.2 b.! a b. I.I L2 I. Me 9 a �a .! ?.9 .B 1.3 b.9 b.9 1.0 b.9 8. Ij t.,3 }.0 ?.6 ?A a a.4 a2 a.l a.0 i1.0 9-0a °Pa P.P I POLE own I5' �II9 �. Is by 11 b2 a as bs b.] be I.t e. a a ih Ils .9 ] ?a lis �a.s °z.3 °..e � °_ $. a. Ys ?.z Is ins a.2 k1 4s %a %a a.i by a.a as as E%6T. EPL 6�ML% Y OAO l by a.l %a aalb ba .5 .6 0 by 9 I A i t he bb b2 b.l %a by by by he by by .1 to b2 is b.4 IS is by - Is as Is is b.4 ° is, b b. b.s_ °stea.+ bsas a.4 is 0 to i.3 b.9 O b3 b.z b.: ba by by by by ' ELL - P A 'i%Pj SME X?: 2" CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED 'IN 0 6 2006 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT PP244O-M W DRAT own 25' Rem 4T. 2" by by b.0 b.l b.t b.l b.2 b.2 b3 b.3 b1 b2 bt 2 / , as [q�.� .. G2v..::l a. a3 "A2 z 3 ,b3' b2 b3- a.2, e2'�"az �°°r2 "%3 - s he Y.z Is ?b6e a. e.3 b.z as by Is by by by �"� - -ms1ee `@'Purrs` -_ 1 u ++ Is by to b.e es b.: b.t b.: a b. 1 1' b.1 b. i b.t b.l b.l b.l `�ra@.E.� %I- a,2_ S "• -23 -12 fib°= � ba in a.1 a.: to a.: b.l 4a y 6LevP?xN yy ° . I u. he P b.l by by to a b.l 1.1 12 ism ai-, bt�-b3--h!-%o a.l is a2 4z as _ - _ p1 I CLUBHOUSE BUILOING! b a / H es Is bs Is be bs he 11a.3 �s }: 31 h3.4 in- b.s� b.z ba- a.;�a.3�IS-%+-eS Sl L MAIN .'LOOK L05A - - - A .� bs bs P38 Ese:a w w6 s ba bs b.t b.4 11 }2 4: ba ba b.M- a.s bs-as a ba bA ba bs is b.e s b.z b.f - > 1.] }z b2 b bn ba P.s P.LCT .8 b ba bs L bs b.e b.; I bb ] bs 1. b3 b b.s .S }n }Iliuminonce Volues:Fcl o Pb.e a bs ba ba bs t: %A is b.s Ib.s a. as 9,.a }., },� Rveroge =2.23 \Maximum =].0 ba a ba ba ba as .I b.3 b i.e }i.l b. bA 1, as, }.� HORNE MRIN. BUILDING Minimum =0.i r Rn Min Ratm=9.9'0 \ \ s l by Ba b.e 3s l e .._ s S Ma"MIn Po-io=1!.00 a b.3 .0 a 2.: %I }.0 ° i a.6 b.0 ?2 2a is Is he by Am Q a.3 SG4 by 12 Is 2a I.9 IS by by by by IS 1.5 I .o ,«.* b.e bs ��+v,Ppy; b.2%e .L a.s -8 .4 e.> .6 .9 .6 a, bya.a cPs. r M1xr he he In a.2 b2 b.z 2 a3 ey6."sa�yma :SDS it., IS a.e Pa as by by a to b.: 13.1 Wu to fib- 42 'r.2 .$.z by IS by am by he `a� --- a` ae a.e to 'as�As-__ba 12 9aab.e>,s 'a<z /------- = x-_=- J W A W- _ Name (2) 5100 /(4)3100 3500 Jacobsen 72 cushman ball picker cart masey f walk mowers topdresser ,,If art. Spreaders sprayer `dirt pile ✓80/20 pile sand pile fertilizer rack ✓ 2 more utility vehicles Blower / Bobcat aerator ball picker brush hog (4)greens rollers Size 9x9 9x9 6x8 6 x 8 6x8 6x8 7x11 9x9 6x9 5x10 5x10 6x14 5x4 8x5 5x8 7x7 12 x 12 12 x 12 12 x 12 17x4 5x10 5x10 3x8 6x10 4x6 12 x 12 6x8 5x6 Serial # 03502-70109 03502-30421 04353-50457 04353-41042 04351-70193 04350-40167 7795-2067 30788-80978 898652-99003755 G1 IA-J R3 -F4236-20 M -G0703 04052-72266 / r r `'•�J'+`l I� G l.yOJ� , '.' l,� C� � G�; r.�X)Q �,!�;,/.; watertank/trallor 6x10' (2)ball washers 4 x 5 .4x5 J +j1 s parts washer 3 x 4� + cV°� pesticide storage 4 x 4 v gas can storage 4 x 2 oil drum storage 4 x 4 J first aid/safty storage 3 x 2 /irrigation pipe 20' long ✓ irr. Fitting storage drag mats wall space stringtrimmers wall space ✓ variety of shovels, wall space rakes, tampers, etc. misc. storage: teemarkers, flagsticks, rope, stakes, garbage cans, spare tires PaGKS � $oX G5 �lYlo�ioK LJ Gr�m� Prevrrlf�on de.�e��ors � so �� i- �►�I�sf Name (2) 5100 j (4) 3100 3500 J Jacobsen 72 cushman ball picker cart masey f walk mowers topdresser V fart. Spreaders L sprayer `/dirt pile ✓80/20 pile sand pile /fertilizer rack ✓ 2 more utility vehicles Blower Bobcat aerator ball picker brush hog (4)greens rollers Size 9x9 9x9 6x8 6x8 6x8 6x8 7x11 9x9 6x9 5x10 5x10 6x14 5x4 8x5 5x8 7x7 12 x 12 12 x 12 12 x 12 17x4 5x10 5x10 3x8 6x10 4x6 12 x 12 6x8 5 x 6 Serial # 03502-70109 03502-30421 04353-50457 04353-41042 04351-70193 04350-40187 7795-2067 30788-60978 898652-99003755 G1 1 A -J R3 -F4236-20 M -G0703 04052-72266 water tank/trailor 6 x 10 (2)ball washers 4 x 5 4x5 parts washer 3 x 4 Pesticide storage 4 x 4 v gas can storage 4 x 2 oil drum storage 4 x 4 first aid/safty storage 3 x 2 /irrigation pipe 20' long ✓ irr. Fitting storage -/ drag mats wall space stringtrimmers wall space variety of shovels, wall space rakes, tampers, etc. misc. storage: teemarkers, flagsticks, rope, stakes, garbage cans, spare tires Page 1 of 1 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: thomas anderson [andersonthomase@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 3:12 PM To: Al-laff, Sharmeen Subject: Halla Greens Sharmeen, My name is Tom Anderson. I live in Lake Riley Woods behind David Gatto's house. I am very concemed with the proposed changes that are being added to the conditional use permit for Hala Greens. The change that alarms me the most is the addition of the parking lot lights. The back of my house faces Pioneer Trail and already we have seen dramatic increases in traffic. Parking lot lights across the road would light up the inside of my house and I would have no say in when they went on and off. Please take this into condideration when you are discussing the additions. It seems to me a bit misleading when certain things are agreed upon and then we have to defend ourselves aginst a bunch of additional items. I will be in attendance at this evening's meeting. Sincerely, Tom Anderson Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. 2/7/2006 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Walstad, David P [DWALSTAD@amfam.coml Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 11:32 PM To: AIJaff, Sharmeen Subject: Halla Greens Comments for 2/7/06 Planning Commission Mtg Sharmeen, My wife and I live at 10071 Great Plains Blvd, which is directly South of the Halla Greens property. I am out of the state and will not be able to attend the 2/7/06 Planning Commission meeting, so I wanted to email you with some comments, questions and concerns over the Halla Greens proposal. Please include this in the written comments for the Planning Commission meeting. We are very concerned and upset over the requests to expand the proposal far beyond what was originally represented and approved, especially when there have been several incidents where prior approvals, permits, and agreements have been violated or ignored. The new proposal from applicants Don Halla and KK Design dated January 6, 2006 differs drastically from the prior proposals from Ron Saatzer and Herfort Norby Golf Course Architects. Is this the same ownership entity as initially proposed? It seems that there are different principals, different designers, and a vastly different operation plan for this property than what was presented in prior meetings. It's hard to see how this is just a site plan and conditional use "amendment". It seems to be an entirely new operation and proposal from different principals. The January 6, 2006 letter from John Kosmas includes several statements under section 5. Lighting that have absolutely nothing to do with lighting or safety issues, and clearly show intent to develop this land far beyond what was represented or approved. Expansion of Operations: The initial requirement was for no exterior lighting. After earlier reviews, the proposal was amended to "No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety light." Now, according to the applicant, it is necessary to light up the parking lot with 27' towers, light up all of the buildings inside and out throughout the evening hours, add a miniature golf course with lights, add lights to the driving range, stay open from 6:00am to 11:00pm, and stay open year round in order to provide safety lights. This is ridiculous, and clearly designed as either property protection or income generation devices. Exterior Lighting: On the surface, it appears reasonable to have parking lot lighting for personal safety, but Bluff Creek golf course has no parking lot lights. If the hours and seasonal nature of the business are not extended, there is no reason to have lights on all night. If the concern is truly for personal safety, and its deemed necessary to have parking lot lights, they should be put on timers to shut off after the business is closed. We do not support all night lighting solely for personal property protection. If that is a major concern, the applicant should install an alarm system. Miniature Golf Course: John Kosmas makes the statement (not a request) that "The course currently includes a driving range and in the future a family miniature golf course, both of with require the use of lighting during the evening hours of operation." What miniature golf course? The proposal does not "currently" include this and there is to be no "evening hours of operation". A miniature golf course is not a golf course, and is not considered as such by the City's zoning district codes for permitted, accessory or conditional uses. The City website lists miniature golf courses separately as permitted in zoning districts BH -Highway Business or BG -General Business, and conditional in BF -Fringe Business. None of these apply to this property. We are not located in a business district and do not want to turn this area into one. I don't see where the Planning Commission letter dated 2/7/06 specifically addresses this issue. I would like to see the denial of a miniature golf course on this premises in writing in the document. Year Round Operation, Hours of Business: We strongly oppose year round operation. Operation of what? Hardly to sell a few sandwiches and coffee, as the applicant's proposal states. It is not necessary for a golf course to be open year round. We strongly oppose keeping the driving range open year round and lighting it. There is already a business 1 mile south of this property that provides this service to the general public in a area that is appropriately zoned for it. This golf course attained approval by representing it was seasonal use only, as a sunrise to sunset operation. We strongly oppose any expansion of this for either winter use or from 6:OOam to 11:OOam. Please clarify what "sunrise to sunset" means, as we are concerned over the vagueness of the wording. Sunrise and sunset are exact times of day that vary by day. Does this mean that no public is to be on the golf course after sunset, or that they also have to have left the clubhouse? If sunset is 9:30pm, how long after that are people allowed to sit in the outside veranda's? What about hours for mowing, collecting range balls, and other maintenance? The concern is over noise and lighting. I feel that this should be clarified to the applicant and the neighbors. Lighting the Driving Range: Also listed under the "Lighting" section is "Lighting for the driving range is currently being evaluated and the information should be available shortly." Again, they imply that this is already acceptable and assume they can light the driving range and operate year round. There is no reason to light a driving range that is open from sunrise to sunset. Private Road Usage and Easement Rights: The state highway to the west and county road to the north are addressed, but not the private road to the south. This golf course has been under construction for 2 years, and the applicant's have been using the private gravel road that boards the south side of this property on a regular basis during the construction time. This is not part of the Halla Greens property. The people with properties on this road (including myself) have easement rights. I believe this road is on property owned by Tom & Kathleen Gertz and Dave Teich. I would like to clarify in writing first, that there is to be no public access to the golf course via this road, and second, whether the golf course entity has any legal easement rights to use this road for construction or maintenance purposes. Doesn't the golf course entity have to have easement rights to use this road? This is the same road that MN DOT refers to in it's letter dated November 23, 2005, in which they say "If Halla Greens is using the gravel access road, they must apply for a Mn/DOT access permit." Have they applied for a permit? The wear and tear on this gravel road increases dramatically with heavy truck usage, especially in the spring and fall when ground moisture is high. Water Runoff Onto Neighboring Properties: The applicant has added an elevated dirt berm on the south side of the property that abuts the private gravel road. There is no ditch between the birm and the road, and so with this design, water runs off from the birm directly onto the gravel road surface. This was done late in 2005, and my concern is that this will lead to an increase in water on the road surface which results in potholes and increased maintenance costs. This should be corrected, as there shouldn't be additional runoff directed onto the road. Landscaping: The prior proposal included minimum standards and the applicant's proposal for trees and shrubs along the south and east sides of the property (Page 10, Chanhassen Short Course Staff Report, September 2, 2003. The newest documents make no reference to this at all. What happened to them? What is the status of the landscaping plan in this area? Site Plan Map: The site map provided is dated August 2003, and does not show the location of the new buildings or changes to the landscape plans. Where are the training shed and ball washing building to be located? We are well aware that there are acceptable conditional uses of this property, and in the past, we had supported the golf course development as the prior applicant was willing to listen to the neighborhood's concerns and incorporate them into it's design. Apparently, this is no longer the case. The tone and content of the applicant's January 6, 2006 proposal makes it clear that they have no concerns over the neighborhood impact or for city zoning and usage requirements. We realize the city and the commissions hear complaints from neighbors on most zoning issues, but we feel strongly that this proposal goes far beyond reasonable use of this property and is detrimental to the neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration. Dave & Judy Walstad 10071 Great Plains Blvd Chanhassen, MN Page 1 of 1 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Elizabeth Mikkelsen [elizabeth.mikkelsen@zimmer.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 4:08 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: Halla Golf Course Hi Sharmeen — I live on Foxford Road — close to Pioneer Trail, so we are one of the houses that will be most effected by any major developments at the golf course. Can you answer a few questions for me? 1) Since the land on which the golf course is now situated, was originally slated/proposed as a housing development — what is it zoned? I would not think that zoning for a housing development and zoning for a full service golf course would be identical — but can you tell me if this is so? 2) Why is the city allowing a zoning change if the two zoning ordinances are different? 3) What is a "done deal" at this point? The original, non -lighted course, of course, but what else will be non- negotiable? Have other approvals been made or agreements made with Halla of which the homeowners are unaware? 4) No lights were ever approved — it was to be a day -light course only. Yet, as we watched construction of the course and parking lot, we saw wiring/lighting bases being installed. Why was Halla allowed to complete this activity without discussion/permission? Having a full service, 24/7 type of lighting golf course is way beyond the scope of what was originally proposed. To allow for night use/lighting will ruin the ability of homeowners to use our property to the fullest extent. The noise associated with a late night course, the additional traffic that a lighted course will draw; the light pollution and the inability of homeowners to see their own night sky will truly detract from home values and quality of life. Why must tax -paying residents have to fight to maintain their quality if life and place of residents. We bought property in this neighborhood so that we could have land and a somewhat rural setting close to Chanhassen. Why is a developer being allowed to undertake a major modification in context and intent? Why did City Inspectors not stop these modifications while they were going in versus having the residents have to fight'after the fact"? If you could shed some light on this subject — I'd really appreciate it. Any or all help you can provide would be great. Thanks so much Elizabeth Smith Mikkelsen 9591 Foxford Road Elizabeth Smith Mikkelsen Director, Clinical Affairs Zimmer Spine 952-830-6306 phone 952-857-5656 fax 952-837-6906 efax elizabeth.mikkelsen@zimmer.com 2/7/2006 Page I of I AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Jimhautman@aol.com Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 11:04 AM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: halla meeting Attachments: ATT37818.txt Sharmeen, My name is Jim Hautman, I live at 11095 great plains blvd., on the southern border of the halla golf course site. Unfortunately I will be unable to attend the meeting tuesday, and was hoping to voice my opinion by email. I live and work at home and see daily the illegal dumping of trash etc. from Halla nursery[ see photos, obtained legally]. the dump site is just feet away from my property and so the trash evetually washes onto my property. Since the start of the golf course it is now also the golf course dump site. I'm afraid next it will also be a restaurant dump. I know you have tried to stop them and I appreciate that. I just want to reaffirm it's continuing, and if there is anything I can do to help you stop it, let me know. I am also opposed to lights at the course, I was assured by Ron Saatzer when he was involved that it would be daylight hours, no lights. Besides there is already a lighted range a mile away. 1 am opposed to many other things Halla nursary does, but I feel these two have the biggest negative effect on the neighborhood and the environment. Thanks for your time, I hear only good things about you and your work. Jim Hautman 2/7/2006 Page 1 of 3 Al-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Weread4fun@aol.com Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 2:18 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: Halla Greens February 4, 2006 To Sharmeen AI-Jaff and the Chanhassen City Council: I am writing with regard to the planning commission's staff report concerning Halla Greens. I live in the white colonial house directly behind Dave and Judy Walstad's home and have owned my land for almost a dozen years. Over these many years, I have seen how disrespectfully Don Halla treats the neighbors on this side of Pioneer Trail and how he creates his own rules to suit his wishes, no matter what we and the City of Chanhassen have to say. Though Halla Nursery's big trucks use the access road in front of our homes many times daily during the growing season, he has never once offered to help repair the ruts left by his heavy machinery. In fact, he has claimed that he has a right not to be responsible, since he was here first. He continues to dump loads of waste from Halla Nursery an average of once a day during the summer into the ravine near Jim and Dorothy Hauptmann's home despite being asked numerous times by the city and the neighbors to stop. Is this legal? Though I was optimistic about the Chanhassen Short Course when it was initially proposed by Ron Saatser and Don Halla, and spoke in favor of it in 2003 at a city council meeting, I am very concerned with the site plan amendments and variances he and John Kosmas have now proposed. Those items and my concerns are listed below. First, in the initial plans that were approved in the fall of 2003, there were four items of profound importance to the neighbors: 1. Hours of operation will be seasonal, limited from sunrise to sunset. 2. No outdoor speaker system is permitted. 3. No commercial kitchen shall be permitted in the clubhouse. 4. No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety lights. 1. I do not believe the hours of operation should be changed from what were initially proposed. They should be limited to seasonal use from sunrise to sunset, and strictly enforced as originally agreed to. The land is zoned for agricultural use, and while running a golf course fits within these guidelines, the extended hours and year-round operation proposed by John Kosmas sound more like a commercial restaurant/business use than an agricultural use of land. 2. I would like to reiterate that there should be no outdoor speaker system. (Halla Nursery akeady has one of these that we can hear on warn and breezy days.) 2n12006 Page 2 of 3 3. The original (2003) intent of not permitting a commercial kitchen was because the primary use of land was as an executiveof course. Ron Saatser explained his dream of creating the course so that children, teenagers and families could enjoy the game of golf. The clubhouse was simply a place to buy a Coke on a hot day or grab a snack or a sandwich. It was not supposed to be a restaurant with screened porches that served as a business in its own right, encouraging people to stay well after their round had finished. If patrons leave at 11 pm, it is reasonable to believe that employees will be cleaning up and closing around midnight. As neighbors, we find this unacceptable because the new amendments and variances Halla and Kosmas have applied for are not minor changes, but major differences in the way the operation would be nm. Neither Halla or Kosmas have approached the neighbors (as Ron Saatser did) to gather our input. 4. I strenuously object to any exterior lighting, except one or two lights fastened to the buildings for safety reasons or a maximum of three safety lights, not to exceed fifteen feet tall, no matter how large the Halla Greens parking lot is. Just as granting the extended business hours in the variance will "be considered an annoyance to the neighbors in the early morning and evening hours contrary to the original use permit," so will these lights be considered an annoyance. Not only will they be a source of light pollution and change our views, but this is in direct violation of the initial agreement in 2003. I am also concerned that if you allow Mr. Halla to add lights, he will push to have longer hours. I believe the city needs to be very firm with Mr. Halla regarding this point or we will end up with a lighted parking lot and the additional lights he has mentioned for his driving range and miniature golf course. This is more in line with the look of an amusement park or a car sales lot in front of our homes, rather than the golf course we envisioned! Again, this smacks more of commercial zoning which is not approved for this area rather than the agricultural zoning which is. John Kosmas has already referred to the use of outdoor lights after dark for the benefit of the patrons of the restaurant and, by remaining on all night, to prevent vandalism. This is unacceptable. This has more to do with property protection than safety. Mr. Halla does not have bright lights on during the night at his Nursery, and this is something I have told him repeatedly how much we and the other neighbors appreciate. I understand having a few lights for safety, but if the golf course opens at dawn and closes at dusk, there should be no need for further lighting. Finally, I am concerned about the current gravel road that borders the golf course. This is the road we neighbors use to access our property. We were told in 2003 that this road would not be used by golf course patrons or for maintenance, yet the orange construction fabric meant to be a buffer between the course and the road was removed so heavy machines could access our road during construction. Once again, Mr. Halla pushed past the boundaries set by the City and the good faith agreement we had in going forward with the creation of the golf course. Since Eric Olson has been in charge, this has improved, however, we still have had to spend money to repair our road several rimes and I had to fix my car's tie rod when it was impaired due to the road's damage from the golf course equipment. This is the road Mr. Halla's nursery trucks use to reach the ravine for dumping. What is to stop him from dumping the waste from his golf course there as well? Since the Halla tree lot no longer exists, I believe there is no valid reason for Halla trucks to utilize this road any more. It is meant to be an easement for my neighbors and me, not a commercial road. If it is within your jurisdiction, I would like you to agree there should be no use of this gravel easement for any Halla business use whatsoever. (As far as we know, the "current business use" is entirely for access to the golf course and to access the ravine for dumping.) Based on Don Halla's years of disregard for the rules and guidelines from the City of 2/7/2006 Page 3 of 3 Chanhassen, pertaining to the dumping and to the original conditional use permit for the golf course— you may know of others—I am very concerned that he will continue to push the limits in every way possible. Please examine how Halla Nursery has grown over the years and consider the way the Chanhassen Short Course has grown into the proposed extravagant plan for Halla Greens ---complete with a miniature golf course, lighted parking lot (with 104 spaces), more outbuildings (with plans for expansion already mentioned), then use all the resources at your disposal to limit Halla Greens impact on the neighbors and the environment. Thank you. Sincerely, Gaye Guyton 10083 Great Plains Blvd 952-445-1034 2/7/2006 E ,lk6 o D x' re-* Jr 5- G 0 N G n, LL O c J0� Cct�'4 �0 p 4� N is ,5L)4 ��mo= axgm„ C W � I l ✓ � �/. � ( � y Ali ,.y�,�,.'V � : v' ? u N f y u a C C q "x°`S H n` 0�- a a y AA - p 0l cqe hs Clea%n -I,1,, fop cl1esso r �-1, of SpI; F to l Gene c rJZ�1��ujL Cat% Cl/ I5A ME 4R 18 U O n � c m v q L O) C n i Q r t =mmay C a1 N 0 1�/P d' CSf �UoyY xaoQ mE_¢ W m mm 9 tmJ m i m C • " U i✓7 W m mn� Y m m �c �1✓�/i'/`���NrflArv.`i �'S • V C�uiVt� fTa, �� E � UC ql N r��aa m a • c r t =mmay a m�c Ea m•i 1�/P d' CSf �UoyY xaoQ mE_¢ W m m m • G t c i✓7 W m I� m a � C �c �1✓�/i'/`���NrflArv.`i �'S • V C�uiVt� fTa, �� E � UC ql N r��aa c I =�O .kgv 6,0,Ucr4�e- Ca/ 6 1� 5�6 9 X 6D D3 )x bo P✓1 � L► � /Club House L- i4 a� � gt,t,lp WtP i� � � X ( C) b o o Q �' 2 . Maintenance Building — r� 3. Ball Washing Building �z sL1 -71Zx �z �`S�eA5'V l W8 - � V N� „ c - �.p��tna p; - 4. Shelter Building �Q }o C��`'1-� �\� ��" nc,�e cjnwi 5. Temporary Building Z W p 0.Y{eC L,O ' Jlf� �0�e scutr�sc w�owi h 6. Building Materials \/y W -' I 7. Hours of operation &m(-(GO�}'y hd aF♦� s 4,1 No (� \. YDS - 8. Lights II II Ync'� ; r eXis}�'o� c+,A�fovaJ� — oM9l lavte�sc�ce V U C>w"In 15 -\o M"(� qCe-P-'n VV\ 01/\� - _ DJ'�- 1i iC--Y-�� �ex "a 1 t City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard �Chanhassen, MN 55317 W! ry 1 OF (952) 227-1100 Date: January 9, 2006 Air To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department Ktm When P\ease tet�t�o \atno ton9et geed U \\�ished tt Shan you\ . 11-414 By: Sharmeen A]-Jaff, Senior Planner Subject: RALLA GREENS — Request for a Site Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Variances for the construction of ;�.gulf course on property located on the southeast comer of the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard (Highway 101) and Pioneer Trail. Applicant: John Kosmas. Planning Case: 05-39 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on January 6, 2006. The 60 -day review period ends March 7, 2006. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on February 7, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than January 27, 2006. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or Sprint/United) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco To: S h If v N` are. Date: (! or From: Neic J FOR YOUR COMMENTS FOR YOUR INFORMATION J FOR YOUR APPROVAL ❑ NOTE & RETURN J TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ❑ NOTE & FILE J CALL ME ❑ FOR YOUR SIGNATURE J SEE ME ❑ J REPLY & SEND ME COPY ❑ COMMENTS: Nej SJC.,oJ 1114- *h.J T-, r-0 0 Copyright 1969,1970— rel OB Nds, Inc., BronxvNe, N.Y. 10709 V.W. Eimicke Assodates, Inc., BrwIanlle, N.Y. 10708 Tel. (914) 337-1900 • Fax (914) 337-1723 Distribded in Canada sdely by V.W. Eimioke Ltd., Peterborough, Ori Tel. (705) 743-4202 • Fax (705) 743-9994 PRlM IN uu Form OA -4 Date: October 21, 2005 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department By: Sharmeen A]-Jaff, Senior Planner Subject: HALLA GREENS — Request for a Site Plan Amendment for the expansion and redesign of a club house on property located on the southeast comer of the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard (Highway 101) and Pioneer Trail. Planning Case: 05-39 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on October 14, 2005. The 60 -day review period ends December 13, 2005. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on November 15, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than November 4, 2005. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official E Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or SprintiUnited) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco Carver County GIS Mapping Application 14 r r w 1 101 �4 l Xdp CmIed bj Ca CWIMySOS Lagend Nwd Teat US Nigivays Rv HNHky.ays N OkiMap Created on: C- Oxiqltoa,J, 10-21-2005 vMs Carver P.rz.h County k.iv M2 This map was created using Carver County's Geographic Information Systems (GIS), it is a compilation of information and data from various City, County, State, and Federal offices. This map is not a surveyed or legally recorded map and is intended to be used as a reference. Carver County is not responsible for any inaccuracies contained herein. To: Sh�- ^^ �r Date: ) �'� o 6 From: J FOR YOUR COMMENTS FOR YOUR INFORMATION J FOR YOUR APPROVAL ❑ NOTE & RETURN ❑ TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ❑ NOTE & FILE ❑ CALL ME J SEE ME J REPLY & SEND ME COPY COMMENTS ❑ FOR YOUR SIGNATURE A N o \- a ✓i P-*- Jr dU n anCri'MJ Ak 3 -w-e 4rX O Copyright 1%9, 1970- ural Office A &, Inc., Bmnx IW, N.V. 10708 V.W. Eimicke Associates, Inc., Bronwile, N.Y. 10708 Tel. (914) 337-1900 • Fax (914) 337-1723 DisVitoAe in Canada solely by V.W. Eimicke W., Peleiftmugh, Ontario Tel. (70.5) 7a33202 • Fax (705) 7439994 PRINTER IN OSA Form OA -4 Date: January9, 2006 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department Whef\ OS to Ktm�eed ase �et�tro\3 f\o �or0et p\ft�tshed It �� f\ your By: Sharmeen A]-Jaff, Senior Planner Subject: HALLA GREENS — Request for a Site Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Variances for the construction of a golf course on property located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard (Highway 101) and Pioneer Trail. Applicant: John Kosmas. Planning Case: 05-39 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on January 6, 2006. The 60 -day review period ends March 7, 2006. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on February 7, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than January 27, 2006. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official L Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or Sprint/United) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 McDonald: Does anybody want to ad any friendly amendments? Keefe: Could you restate your number 10 again? Papke: Number 10 is that specifically the hours of operation will remain sunrise to sunset and specifically no mowing nor customer traffic allowed outside of those hours of operation. Undestad: Do we need to put anything in there as far as the seasonal stuff too? What are they doing? How long? Papke: I don't think they're going to mow during the winter. Larson: Yeah, but they wanted to have operations year round so do we want to friendly amend that it's spring through fall? McDonald: In that case, what you're wanting to do is to stick to the original agreement which was hours of operation shall be seasonal and limited to sunrise to sunset. Papke: What's seasonal? If we're going to do that we should state what is seasonal. Larson: Lack of snow and ice? McDonald: Well, that's one of the problems with some of this is, what is seasonal and what is sunrise to sunset? Larson: And when we have that 80 -degree day in November? McDonald: I'm not sure that we as a Planning Commission can define those particular terms. All we can do is say you must adhere to it and if you want clarification that's above our paid rate. Papke: Was there a friendly amendment there Deborah, or not? Larson: Yes. Well, no because it's already there. Zom: Kurt, could you please repeat your motion so I make certain I vote accurately? Papke: The motion is as stated in the staff report with the following exceptions. The fust exception is a change to condition number 9 to limit the height of the light pole to four feet. The second change is to add amendment number 10 which prohibits mowing and customer traffic outside of the allowed hours of operation which is sunrise to sunset, and the third change is to remove corrugated from the denial of the variance so it denies a variance for metal to be used, so this would not be a metal building in any shape or form. Also, make sure that we deny the extension of the golf course hours. 74 0 0 OS -39 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 19. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement. 20. The building shall comply with the Planned Unit Development building setback requirements." All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: HALLA GREENS (AKA CHANHASSEN SHORT COURSE): REOUEST FOR A STfE PLAN AMENDMENT (2003-07). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT (2003-04), AND VARIANCES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A GOLF COURSE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF GREAT PLAINS BOULEVARD (HIGHWAY 101) AND PIONEER TRAIL. APPLICANT: JOHN KOSMAS — PLANNING CASE NO. 05-39: Public Present: Name Address John Kosmas Don Halla Sandy Halla Erik Olson Dennis & Nancy Mills Tom Jessen Tom Anderson Elizabeth Smith Mikkelsen David & Sharon Gatto Steve McMeen Kathy Asplin Magdy & June Ebrahim Tom Gertz Gaye Guyton Judy Walstad KKE Design, 6112 Excelsior Blvd., St. Louis Park 6601 Mohawk Trail, Edina 6601 Mohawk Trail, Edina 9855 Delphinium Lane 9510 Foxford Road 9570 Foxford Road 9371 Foxford Road 9591 Foxford Road 9631 Foxford Road 9391 Foxford Road 541 Pineview Court 521 Pineview Court 10001 Great Plains Blvd. 10083 Great Plains Blvd. 10071 Great Plains Blvd. Sharmeen Al -Jeff presented the staff report on this item. McDonald: Okay. Dan? Keefe: Let me start with the lighting. How many light standards are we talking about in the parking lot, do we know? How many light standards? I presume they are on poles and would be cast downward, correct? Al -Jaffa Correct. If you tum to the last page of your staff report... 41 SCARK° • 0. Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 Keefe: Is it just the six? Oh, there's over here, too and along the road. Al-Jaff: Correct. There will be three fixtures, now these are the double -headed ones, the shoebox. There are two fixtures along the driveway and then there is another fixture lighting the way into the storage building. Keefe: Can you orient me just a little bit on what I'm looking at here? Is Pioneer Trail to the top of the page and then 101 is on the left side? AI-Jaff: Way on the left. If you would look at this...here is Highway 101, here is Pioneer, this is the parking lot right here and the light fixtures will be right here. Keefe: So the property line to the east is approximately how far from that parking lot? Al-Jaff: 388 feet. Keefe: And the topography of the land, do we have berms or do we have golf course topography? Often golf courses have some topography to them. Al-Jaff: There isn't substantial topography. Keefe: Okay. So to the east we are not seeing any. How about then to the south? Is there more to the south? A]-Jaff: There is a substantial distance to the south. Again, these are the questions related to the lighting fixtures? Keefe: Yes, more to the lighting and I'm just concerned, I'm particularly thinking of the surrounding neighborhoods and kind of what they would see when the lights are on and if limiting the hours of operation to sunrise to sunset, if we agree to that, would the lighting be allowed beyond that? After that, is there a requirement to turn them off or how would that...? Al-Jaff: We could make it a requirement of the conditional use permit that they be motion lights if they are for safety reasons. That would definitely be an option so they would be turned off but if there was movement in the area then... Keefe: ...they would come on. ...to know that that's lighting for safety reasons. I don't have any problem with that. The question is, are we going to have a beacon of lights sitting out there when nobody's there or, that really... Al-Jaff: It has to meet ordinance requirements which is the downcast, shielded and not -to - exceed Y2 -foot candle. Based upon the photometrics that we have received, they meet that requirement. Keefe: It's one thing of the light casting out rather than sort of looking at it and seeing if we can require just the motion after dark. 42 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 0 Al-Jaff: That's definitely a requirement. Keefe: So to the east we probably have a view. To the south it's a much greater distance. Al-Jaff: It's a substantial distance. And there is landscaping on this side. Keefe: And north is... Al-Jaff: North, we have a 50 -foot setback from the edge of the parking lot and then you have the right-of-way for Pioneer Trail, which I believe is 80 feet. Fauske: The plan shows 73, but they may not be current. Al-Jaff: 73? So 73 plus 50, over 120. Keefe: Do they have berming along the north in this plan? AI-Jaff: There is some berming but it's not 15 feet. It will not be 15 feet. Keefe: Any landscaping? Al-Jaff: There is landscaping proposed around the entire site. Keefe: I'm just trying to get a feel for the site as we look at it. Thanks. McDonald: Mark? Undestad: While you're on the lighting. The parking lot, there's some berming on therefor these cars that should be out of there at sunset and the employees or whatever that might be around there as they are coming and going, are the headlights going to be shooting off on everybody or is that bermed up enough on Pioneer Trail, all these stalls that face the north? Al-Jaff: There will be berming along Pioneer Trail. There will also be some landscaping along that area. Undestad: Nothing will shine up onto Pioneer Trail or over the hill into the neighborhood? Al-Jaff: No. McDonald: Debbie? Larson: So we're dropping the lights 10 feet from what they proposed? Al-Jaff: That's what staff is recommending. May I go back to this? What I will do is just focus on this area here. This plan proposes a berm and the berm is approximately 10 feet at the highest 43 • 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 point and it gradually goes down. Here is the parking lot immediately behind it. You will also notice that there is landscaping along the entire perimeter of the site. There are no changes proposed to the landscaping plan. There are no changes proposed to the grading plan either. (male voice)???: Is that berm in now? AI-Jaff: No. Larson: So the trees are going to be immature for many years yet? AI-Jaff: They have to meet ordinance, 2-1/2 inch caliper but yes, to answer your question, the answer is yes. Larson: Is there any possibility that it could be set to where they would have to put in a fuller - type tree like an evergreen versus a deciduous tree? Just for the sake of the headlights, the shielding of the lights. Al-Jaff: I don't believe that with the berm here you will have an issue with the headlights. That will be a substantial berm out here. Larson: Okay. That's all I have. McDonald: Debbie? Zom: I'm sure this will come out in some of the public comments but out of the emails that you shared with us, there seems to be this gravel road that I know it's not part of this. Can you just make a comment on that? Al-Jaff: Absolutely. This is Highway 101. This is the curve in Highway 101. I'm sure you're all familiar with it. There is a private street that continues back here. The nursery uses this private street. This is a private street. There are private agreements. The City cannot get involved in enforcing who uses this private street. I have explained that to the neighbors and explained that because it's a private street governed by private agreements, we can't get involved. Zom: Okay. Thanks. McDonald: Kurt? Papke: Is there anything in City Code or ordinance that would prevent us from looking at a different kind of lighting design? I've been in parking lots that have been very tastefully lit with very low lighting posts, four feet or less tall, where it provides you with sufficient light to get to your car without tripping and falling and finding the lock to put your key in and so on. Would there be anything that would prevent the applicant from taking that kind of approach here? 44 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 Al-Jaff: I think that they could definitely work with the neighbors. Obviously, this is a great desire the neighbors that they... Papke: But from a City Code perspective is there anything that would prevent that kind of design? Would that go against any of our rules, regulations, guidelines, anything of that sort so the applicant has complete freedom to design something that would be much less intrusive into the surrounding area. Al-Jaff: As long as the fixtures are shielded, they are fine. Papke: Okay. Are there any issues with the increase in the size of the maintenance building? This is four times the size it was before. Al-Jaff: That is something that we talked about in house at length. The materials used to maintain the golf course would be stored in that building. There is no size limit in our ordinance. Papke: Okay. There is mention in the applicant text concerning eventual application for lighting of the driving range, if I read this correctly. What we're approving tonight, would that in any way impact, allow, deny, whatever. Is there any consideration to be taken for that aspect of the... AI-Jaff: The only lights that you are approving are the ones that are in the parking lot and then you have two along the driveway, and then the other two. Papke: Okay. If the applicant were to desire to light the driving range, would they come back to the Planning Commission again or what is the process. Al-Jaff: Yes, especially knowing the nature of the situation and how we want to be sensitive to the neighborhood. Papke: Okay. This is more of a rhetorical question. Is there any consideration taken in City Code or guidelines for lighting in this situation that take into account the ambient lighting conditions in the area? Let me explain myself a little bit. We looked at things, for instance, when the movie theatre in downtown Chanhassen wanted to put a few uplights on the movie theatre. In that case, those sorts of things seem reasonably harmless just because it's in a well - lighted area. There are tons of lights surrounding those structures. This particular application is in an extremely dark area. There are almost no street lights. You can see the lights from the casino at night, it's so dark. Am I correct in assuming there is no allowance in City Code for light pollution in an area like this? Al-Jaff: The way light pollution is addressed in the City Code is requiring the fixtures to be shielded, downcast, not to exceed'/Moot candle. Papke: So your answer is that there is no consideration for surrounding conditions? Al-Jaff: Correct. 45 Planning Commission Meet — February 7, 2006 Papke: Okay. How about winter hours? Is there any consideration in this application for year round use? I'm particularly concerned about the driving range. This application is starting to look more and more like the setup down at the base of 101 and 212 where you have a driving range and a golf course and it's lit up at night and yadda, yadda, yadda. Al-Jaff: The hours of operation are sunrise to sunset. This application will be different than what you see down along 212 and 101. They are two different applications. There are specific requirements and things that are permitted on property that abuts Highway 212 or Highway 5 that is not permitted along Highway 101. Miniature golf is not permitted on this site. Papke: Was there mention of miniature golf in the application? Al-Jaff: There was some talk about at some point in the future. There were numerous requests with this application. Papke: So there are no limits to winter hours? Al-Jaff: Sunrise to sunset. Papke: Sunrise to sunset. The only concern I have there is if the lights are on at night and you have snow on the ground, it reflects off the snow so you are going to get more of an issue during the winter as we all know than you do during the summer. I'm assuming then that with a driving range there would be a desire to use that driving range during the hours of operation when there's snow on the ground, yes? Al-Jaff: Yes. Papke: Okay. McDonald: I've got a few questions for you, too. You addressed the one about driving range. On the lights, you say that they have to be shaded so that they downcast. I take it what you're talking about is all around the light would be opaque, I believe, so it's focused down. Al-Jaff: Like a shoebox. Correct. McDonald: On the north side, and again I'm not worried about the east or the west or the south, on the north side there at the property line which is roughly 120, 130 -something feet from maybe the light poles or something, that's going to be I foot candle? Is that what the ordinance... Al-Jaff: That's going to be less than half a foot candle. McDonald: And we know this why? AI-Jaff: Because they submitted the photometrics and we will hold them to these photometrics. EM 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 McDonald: Now what's the difference between a 15 -foot pole and a 25 -foot pole? What does that do? Al-Jaff: When you bring the light fixture down, two things will happen. The area that's illuminated becomes less so we know that as you get closer to the exterior property lines, your foot candle is substantially less. Also, if you live across the street and you look out, chances are you will be able to see a 25 -foot tall pole a lot easier than a 15 -foot pole. McDonald: And by going to the 15 -foot with the 10 -foot bemung, that would help the situation to the north now where I'm talking about where you've got roughly a 10 -foot berm at that north... Al-Jaff: The reason why we chose the 15 -foot is we believe it's a human scale, if you will, a human -scale light fixture. So it's the height of the street lights that we have in downtown versus the shoeboxes that you see along public streets and highways at times. McDonald: Are these going to be halogen lights, or the gas plasma lights, or incandescent lights, or fluorescent lights? What kind of lights are we talking about? AI-Jaff: The City Code, I need to look at it. There is a specific type of light fixture that the applicant would have to use. We have a City Code that governs the type of light fixtures. Bob, if you would kindly ... If there is another question, maybe we can answer it. McDonald: Okay. The other thing that I've got is you state in the report that we are sunrise to sunset and seem pretty much in agreement on that. That's not what I read in the report. The applicant is wanting things, what I read, until 11:00 p.m. at night. AI-Jaff: And staff is recommending denial of that. McDonald: Okay, but what's coming out is there doesn't seem to be a lot of agreement here in some of these areas. I hear the applicant talking about halogen lights. You're saying that there's a City Ordinance requirement that is probably not halogen, it's probably something with a... Generous: Pressure sodium. McDonald: Okay, that's not that much better. So, in some of the points that have been brought up, I guess what my question is how solid is this plan that you're bringing before us because it sounds as though there's still a lot of unknowns here as to what we're looking at. Al-Jaff: The applicant has provided us with a list of amendments. We are recommending that, we believe that what we have before us, what we are recommending approval of, is in compliance with ordinance requirements. Everything else such as landscaping, grading has to comply with the original plan that was approved back in 2003. McDonald: Okay. So for the most part, this is the original plan with certain amendments which are increasing sizes, bringing in the lighting, and those types of things. 47 C� Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 C Al-Jaff: Increasing size, extending hours of operation, illuminating additional area. McDonald: Okay. Down a road as additional things are added to this, they will have to come back through the Planning Commission again to get approval. AI-Jaff: Correct. McDonald: Okay. That's all the questions I have at this point. Is the applicant available to present his case? John Kosmas: My name is John Kosmas. I'm representing Halla Greens. I have an architectural office in St. Louis Park. We were sort of latecomers in the project. This project had been before you well before we were involved two or three years ago. We've basically gotten involved to take a look at the previous request that was approved and then to see how that fits with the current needs and some evaluation that has taken place over the last couple of years. The process of getting this building put together has been taking a bit of time. There's a lot of work that has been going in, a lot of hard work. The people have gone in to develop that site and get that into the condition that it is right now and in doing so, also gave them time to look at, okay, how do things fit together in what we see today. We have a very good project. We'd like to enhance that project with the changes that we're requesting. I'll take them kind of in a one by one. The original building size, what was determined was that that needed some enhancement. Just having outdoor spaces, we live in Minnesota, our favorite bird doesn't always want to be around us so we wanted to enclose some portraits, so that was developed. The look of the building was reevaluated. There was an architectural office, Anderson & Associates, who would take a look at it, and the Halla's took a look at the building saying, we'd like something a little nicer. All of a sudden that starts changing the characteristics of the building, the characteristics of the grounds around it, and the requirements that I gave you. Beyond the club house, then the amenities of the other buildings. If you are going to have a driving range, you need a facility that cleans and washes the balls and where you bucket them, I'll use that terminology, where you distribute them, where you handle that process. That should be adjacent to the club house. Unfortunately, that wasn't one of the things that was included in the building. Then the evaluation of the means of maintaining this property that's development. Now you start counting up number of mowers, the number of types of mowers that you need and the vehicles that you needs, and we started placing those inside of a building, all of a sudden we realized, okay, that building has to be bigger if we're going to put everything inside. For the longevity of the equipment and proper maintenance of that equipment, it is better if it's inside. We had the discussion with Sharmeen about putting it outside, build fencing and screening around it. But you're not doing that equipment any good having to go through the rains and such like that. So you look at that as say, okay, let's increase the size of that building. So we got to the building, the various buildings that were involved, and the little teaching shed that's off on the course that Sharmeen noted as a place for when it's inclement weather but you can still do some teaching so that the golf pro that can be helping that person doing the work on the driving range, they're in a shelter. That's the function of that building. It's often referred to as a loafing shed as far as it is concerned when you have horses so it's the same type of structure as that three -sided, open-end, sloped roof, so that when the swing takes place you're not hitting anything as far as the structure E3 • r Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 is concerned. So all of those were kind of looked at. We put it together. Basically the site plan is identical, as Sharmeen was saying. Nothing's really changed. A little massaging here and there to accommodate these different buildings, placing them basically staying in the same spot. The elevations of the building are the same. All of that is still the same. All of the basic grading. There is undulation a bit to all directions from the club house. The club house is sitting up at 916 which is basically a little bit taller than the rest of the site is happening around it. That drops off as you go down to the parking lot and go to the point. That grade drops down approximately six to seven feet. You have an elevation back at the north end of that parking that's at an elevation number 910. The road, Pioneer Trail, is an elevation of 914 so this issue of headlights going right onto the highway, they're basically going into the ground. The cars are not perched in an upward direction while they're doing that. They're actually in a downward slope. Everything is draining in that north direction and then off to the west. All of that was taken into consideration. I'm going to walk through a little bit on the, let's take this section. I'm going to have you do the same thing that Sharmeen had you do. The buildings that we're talking about and the orientation as we talked about, Pioneer Trail is on the north side of the property and hopefully I'll put all of these drawings down so north is always up. We have the club house building, the maintenance building, the accessory building (we're calling it a ball washing building), and the teaching building. That's the physical buildings that are on the property to the south. The course is basically laid out and some of you have probably seen it before as far as the first tee, then picking up second, third, fourth, cutting back to the fifth, crossing over six, seven, eight and nine. It's a nine -hole course. There is some variation of grade that occurs in through here. We're all aware of how 101 drops down so that grade down at the lower comer down in there is considerably lower than the course itself so there is some undulation that is occurring there. The plantings that occur all the way around and through, all of you know that this was basically a nursery, a little growing space that was almost like a little tree farm I'll call it, that was functioning. What they've done is they've basically taken out the trees that are necessary for the course, leaving the other ones all in place. We talked about buffering around into this whole side of the property is quite heavily done. This is probably, the north side is probably the most open side and that's the side that will have some plantings and such reestablished in that area. They enlarged some berms that occurred over on this side. There is a break in a berm that happens here to allow water infiltration and then there's a slight berm that's happening over in there and, like I said, there are some new plantings that are happening along the south property line. I'll probably have you come back just a little, let's stay in the parking lot. That seems to be a focus tonight. Let's take care of lighting and I'll fill that in a bit. I did say that we were recommending metal halide rather than sodium. My recommendation for that is they get better coverage and more efficient use of lesser lamps and I figured the fewer number of lamps and I figure the fewer number of lamps starts to help with the idea of less intrusion on my eyes. We've tried to do it with a smaller number a bit taller than what's being requested by staff and again, that gives me better coverage so that I don't have the issues of having lights sitting right next to the roadway. I tried purposely not to put any in over here. You have to on the driveway. That's an automatic. You have to do something to identify this from a safety standpoint. I do not want cars pulling in and out of here if it's perfectly pitch black. Now, the ordinance reads half a foot candle. Along this property line, and I know it's very difficult to read the photometrics, the numbers along that property line are basically running 0 to 0.2 all the way across. This corner, right in through here, is where pick up into that 0.5. Normally, if I were laying the site out, I would have actually made that about a 1.5 to 2 at an intersection because I 49 a 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 like that intersection a little brighter but to comply with the ordinance, we've kept it at the 0.5. So you have the 0.5 that's in this area and all of this like I said is either 0 or below. All of the plantings that are here, both the trees and wildflowers and such that are going to go on that berm, will all be there during the summer season. They will not be there in the winter season except for the trees themselves so there will be a little different type of character. But with the berm that's there, which unfortunately there was a grading plan that was developed that did say ten feet there, but there is no way physically to get ten feet of earth change between what the elevation of the highway is and the elevation of the property. We're not going to build a straight up and down retaining wall and put the earth sloping right back down onto the highway or something like that. Basically, it's going to be a four -foot grade change that occurs that does take care of the, so when I talk about headlights in that area, they're basically being taken care of by the berm that's there and the highway that's there. In relationship to how the light then traverses from vehicles through here, it's basically taken care of by the berm and by the plantings. The lighting from, this is my style of a shoebox, that pole with its lights are basically directing the light downward. Now if I take and just pretend it's sitting way over here off to the left, that light that's coming is basically like I said where this property line runs through here, is zero. There is no light coming from that fixture any place past the property line. I'll correct myself. I said zero but it could be 0.2. That is very minimal, it's virtually zero. I even thought about bringing a photometric reader and turning the lights off and leaving something on in the room so you could see what that actually is. It is virtually darkness. You'll get more ambient light coming from around you, houses or whatever else coming from at you when you measure that kind of a light level. The fixtures are shoebox as it's referred to in the trade. It's basically a box that sits like that. The lamp is typically a horizontal lamp because of the shallowness of the fixture, rather than a vertical lamp and the lens is very minimal. It think it's about a half-inch projection below the actual box itself. So it's a downward casting fixture. Its not intended to spread. Many times you'll see parking lot lights that are sitting like that and shining outward but that is not what we're are proposing. We are proposing that they stay in a downward position because we're not trying to light the road. We're not trying to light the neighbors, we're trying to light the parking lot in a nice, safe manner for people when they come and go. So to address that issue of hours of operation, however we handle that, basically what we recommend is the use of a solar time clock so that that time clock keeps up with what type of day we're having and it changes it. It automatically makes a change on that basis. Something that's going to be motion, it takes too long for a reaction, especially in either one, the use of a halogen or metal halide, or the use of a sodium. They all take a certain amount of time to cook before they actually are a lamp so you don't want those cycling on and off in that manner. So the lights will be kept downward. They'll stay away from the neighborhood. The lighting that is being proposed as we were talking about is basically two along the drive and those are 15 -foot poles. Those are a different scale because we're only trying to light a pod of area in that manner. We're not trying to light all the way down into the course and we're not trying to light back on the road. These we do recommend staying at the 25 -foot elevation because again, going back to the question, it allows me to put less in. It's like the question do I put more lower ones in or do I put less with a reasonable height to them. We're not asking for 30 and 40 -foot which you find sometimes in shopping centers. We're talking about staying in that 25 -foot zone. It gives good coverage. It takes care of the areas that we're talking about. We get some wash out of those and we give people lighting to go by. That lighting is basically there for both customers and employees. Not to shied the customer, but I'm more concerned about the employee coming and 50 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 going because that employee has to be able to come safely before the customers come and leave safely after the customers are through so it's more of a matter of taking care of their needs more than the customers' needs. That leads me to the question of hours of operation. We have sunrise/sunset. That's when we start playing golf, and that's when we finish playing golf but if I'm working in the golf course, I'm going there before that and I've got to do things to get ready for the golfer and I have to do things to close after the golfer's been there. So when we start talking about these hours, it's like if you're going to be there for golf at 6:00, at sunrise, I should have been there by 5:00. 1 should have started mowing green one at that time, have green one clean and ready. Be on green two or three before that first person tees off. There's a difference in what I consider the operational hours for a customer, and the operational hours for taking care of the facility itself. In reverse, the same thing at closing. If I'm coming in at 9:30 or 10:00, as the sun sets in the long hours of the summer, I'm going to then be having to clean up and close after you come in and have a coke or a cup of coffee and a sandwich or whatever until maybe 10, 10:30, 11:00 so I'm going to be leaving at 11:00. So that's our request for looking at the hours actually getting talked about hours. I'd like to see the ordinance; I would have loved to be involved in writing your ordinance. I was listening to your earlier about your differences in ordinances and the car and a half for three bedrooms and such like that. We only had the opportunity once to get involved in writing an ordinance as a user of an ordinance, and it was great because it ended up in my opinion, of course. It worked because it worked for what we saw everybody needing. I would have loved to been involved in writing this one. I understand the sunrise/sunset for the operational hours of the customer, but it has to be different for how you actually run the business. The business has to be earlier, and has to run later and therefore you've got to light it before and after. They'll be off all day and they won't be sitting there burning from 10:00 until 4:00-5:00 in the morning, they'll be off and hopefully everybody's sleeping at that time that's in the neighborhood so it really doesn't make any difference if they are on or off, but they will be off at those kinds of times which appropriately should be. The other lighting that does have to take place is again we have to take customers and clients or golfers back in the balance of the part of the site and so they'll be coming, this is our handicap accessibility and even though we don't see a lot of handicapped golfers, that facility has to still meet those requirements and it will. It does. The driving range at this time is not lit and we have not proposed it to be lit purposely until we see what happens. You have a different facility as I referred to down at the bottom of the hill at 212 and 169 than what we're talking about here. The primary function for this one is the golf and also practicing during the day. It can't run during the winter because the only way you can run, we've done some other winter driving ranges as the one that is down the hill as a net system so they can catch the balls. Those balls come back in through a trough and retrieval system. You can do that in the winter because you're sitting above the snow. In this case we're not proposing anything like that. It's not that type of facility. It's more like you would see like the other golf courses in the area, some of the traditional ones, the Hazeltines, and the Minnekandas and the Interlachens type of thing. They are seasonal. They don't have ball catchers and continuing on through the winter. I'm trying to think if we covered all of those ... we got time, the hours, we got the lighting, the building sizes. What I'd like to do on the building size just to help maybe have you understand that. It looks like we've got a fair amount of room in this building but this is that maintenance building. It gets too light. I'm sorry. I could have darkened it. But basically, the maintenance building has a small office, a little break room for employees, bathroom facilities, a small little storage area that's separated the whole parts department because you have maintain your equipment, and the rest of it then is 51 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 basically vehicle parking and a maintenance area, a little shop area. It's basically there to bring the equipment inside, bring the mowers inside, bring carts inside because there will be carts available for the course. In doing that, then the building gets to be a little bit larger, it gets a little different scale, a different type of building and the economics, and it is partially economics that drive the color, a dark green, evergreen, and a cream color. We'll call it that. At least on my screen that I'm looking at up here turns out to be a little less green. A very moderate, reasonably priced building and efficient building utilizing the same type of building that was proposed before, being a Lester -type building type of facility and I guess I'm one that pushes a little harder as I look around the neighborhood. The property to the east of the golf course has a two -toned brown Lester -type building. I'm going to use their terminology for that. So it felt like it was compatible with that. Looking across to the northwest comer of the property off the comer, there's one, two, three, I think five maintenance -type buildings, Lester -type buildings. There's even one that's a Quonset hut, which is more of a ribbed metal type of a look. In this particular case, we're talking about it being a building that has metal panels that has sort of a board and batten look to them so it's not corrugated. It's not like what we thought up when we were doing typical metal buildings where we had the corrugated metal that we'd screw onto the frame. So, we're looking at it being something that's acceptable in the neighborhood. It becomes sort of a dual question. We're back to codes again. If I were a farm, I could have them. If I had a farm and a residence not any larger than our club house building, it's only a 4,000 square -foot type building. We draw homes that are that large and I have my horse barn. I don't know exactly what the people of the northwest that are across from that other kitty corner do, but there is four buildings on the one parcel and at least two or three on the other, and I think even to the south of us there's a couple of buildings. The metal building, because it's so far off the property and because it seems to be in keeping with the neighborhood, we feel that's an appropriate use. If it were a commercial use, which we're not rezoned as a commercial, we are maintained as an A2 Agricultural property, allowing us to have a golf course on it, it would be a different matter. But it doesn't change zoning. We stay as an ag zoning so therefore I think the ag applications should be applied to the property in its fullest. So therefore the property, the building would actually stay as a metal building rather than changing the materials itself And that's true for the other two buildings. As Sharmeen indicated, we have changed the appearance to the building. I'm not giving you all of the, I didn't tone at all because it's a fair amount to do, but the building that you saw in that colored photo before was basically almost the same lean-to type of building. We're not proposing that. This is a hand, stick -frame building, and trussed roof adding some character to it. Accentuating entries is what is really what you want to have happen in your neighborhoods. It's residential scale. It's potentially, well I don't know how I would judge it. There are homes that I saw when I drove through the neighborhood to the north that I think are larger scale than this one, different style. We're looking at it more for a little different use than we are trying to put ... but it's basically we're using the same material that Sharmeen was showing you before. The asphalt shingles. The question as to what these materials are. This is a trim material. There's bead board that will occur in part of the entrance. This is a product that's called Azack(?). It's a trim plastic. It sounds cheaper when I use that term. It's a much more elaborate trim than that. It's a permanent material. It doesn't deteriorate. It doesn't fail. It accepts paint. We're basically looking at using the white trim with our siding and these are the trim boards that go around the windows and such like that. There will be residential double - hung windows. They're actually what's called a cottage style where the top half portion is smaller than the lower portion so it's being kept in that nice scale of a residence. The use of, in 52 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 this case we ended up developing the clear story glass up on the top, a dormer type of a treatment, to again let some light in from a different direction and add a different character to the building. Currently there are the two screen porches that are on the end. There has been some discussion and it is the same thing relating to if we change the approach. We're going to actually build those screen porches where the foundation is insulated so that if there is a need and a good rationale in the future we may be talking to you again about enclosing one of those so that they can enhance their facility. What did I miss? I'll shut up. You can turn me off. I'll answer questions. McDonald: Okay. I have a question for you. We do have a time limit now. We're obviously not going to make the time limit. Can we run these meetings over or are we... Generous: It's up to the Commission. McDonald: Okay. That's all I wanted to check on. At that point, does anyone, Commissioners, who wants to start asking questions? Go with Kurt. Dan? Keefe: Let me ask you a question. hi regards to the, let me get back to the hours of operation and the lighting, if we were to run that to sunrise to sunset, what would that do to the lighting that you're proposing? John Kosmas: It would stay the same. Keefe: It would stay the same even though... John Kosmas: I've got to have the lights on for you to come early to your tee time and I've got to have the lights on for you to leave and I've got to leave the lights on for the employees. Even though, even if you were to say sunset is the theoretical closing time, people are still on the golf course. They're going to come in, they're going to finish, and the employees have to stay and take care of them. That's why I kind of question the use of that, in the ordinance. If I were running a golf course, that's what I'd have to do. Keefe: Now in regards to lighting itself, you reference a couple of golf courses, Minnekanda and Interlachen, where they utilize in their entrances much lower lighting than what you're proposing. John Kosmas: Not that... Keefe: No, but in terms of height? John Kosmas: Minnekanda has their pole lights coming in on their main drive that are up there. Keefe: Yeah, but Interlachen has their... John Kosmas: Interlachen has it's globes. 53 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 Keefe: Yeah, right. You could do that if they're lower. John Kosmas: And I could do that efficiently in the driveway because the driveway, just like the... Keefe: They're not 15 feet high. John Kosmas: They're probably 12 to 15 and they're also greater than 360 -degree lamps. Now they let light, they're typical, old street -light fashion and they emit light in all directions. You get a great deal different efficiency out of a lamp that's doing that and in many cases it's more efficient for the lighting, but it's potentially more objectionable to the viewer. So your use by the ordinance to ask for it to be a shoebox, I think from the standpoint of those that are driving by and going by, I think it's more compatible. But you have to get them up to get them to light. Otherwise, you're putting them at every 15 -foot interval type of thing and that gets to be a lot of lamps. Keefe: What would be, so if we were to go with more lamps, what would be the conceivable minimum height that you could go at? John Kosmas: I don't know where I would put them except for putting them out on the north side of the parking lot and I don't recommend that because then I'm taking and putting more light to an area where I don't want light so I've got to keep the lights where they are. Keefe: What height would you be looking at? John Kosmas: I'd probably work at 20, I'd work with a 20 -foot high and I'd tip them up to make them cover better. If I start bringing them down to 15 and squaring them up, you're going to probably be putting them at every third parking stall. That's 27 -foot spacing. That's a lot. We have nine stalls to park now, so it's much more effective and actually I think softer when you get to the property line. The ambient light that's going off to the sides like I said is virtually zero. McDonald: Okay. Mark? Undestad: I just have a question on your hours of operation. You want to start at sunrise and have your employees come in an hour, an hour and a half, two hours, who knows how early they are going to come. John Kosmas: A reasonable time to come in. Undestad: But I think most golf courses now, aren't they going to first tee times of 7:00 a.m. rather than the 6:00 a.m. and not having all that? Again, how you can show all that and then you've got residents around there, the trucks come in, the employees come in, the equipment starts rattling. In the summertime people like to sleep with their windows open. I'm seeing more of these that are now, the first tee time is People try to get out there before the club house opens up, but I think 7:00 a.m. to me is... 54 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 • John Kosmas: I'm not a golfer all the time. I'm a hacker. I don't get up early to go play golf. You won't see me be the sun riser. But I understand that, what I've learned and understood, that sunrise is the starting time and many people are willing to do that, partly sometimes to get that early tee time to get through this course in an hour, hour and a half, and they're at work at regular times almost. So it doesn't interfere with anybody's day. Undestad: I kind of see that more with golf courses out in the farms yet. They're still, every time you want to get up, come on out and play but I think the things that are, the courses that are in around the cities and things are starting to move that back. John Kosmas: I don't know. I don't have an answer for that because I'm not familiar with it in that respect. Undestad: It minimizes all that early moming noise out there. John Kosmas: The mowers that we're talking about, they're not huge tractors. The mower that works on a green is almost like a hover because it's not trying to maximize what it's throwing around. It doesn't have to be powerful, it's maintaining. That's the mowing that takes place early. The course can be done safely during the day because they'll be in cages but you can't mow while I'm playing golf or while you're playing golf. So you've got to start that before the people get there and sort of stay ahead of them and that's the purpose for that. Undestad: Other than just the sheer numbers, is there any reason why you wouldn't set up your hours with first tee times? John Kosmas: I'll do it as in economics. If I say you can't start playing golf, let's say I lose four tere times in the morning and I do that enough times during the year and we did a little math, I think if we lost, there were four tee times that you would cut off ...let me just check my notes because we did do it. The question did come up. If you had three foursomes, because you're basically starting them at that 15-20 minute cycle so you cut off an hour of starting time, you'd lose 12 golfers in the morning. If you did it in the evening and you said okay, because we've got to be gone I've got to take off four starting times. I've got to cut it off a half hour, 45 minutes early. Take away another 12. You have 24 golfers that you've lost in that day and if each golfer intended to spend his green fees of $15 and you do that over the period of days that you're open, it's a $60,000 swing. That's $60,000. It helps take care of everything that you're doing on that course. That's a big number. If I could put it in my pocket, I wouldn't probably be here. So it's a big number when you start saying, let's change that half-hour, 45 minutes. It does make a big difference in the operation. I'm not saying, of course, it's an ideal condition. It's every day. And there's days when you don't even play golf because it's raining so that will throw out those days. Just taking them on that average, that's what makes a difference so it is an important factor for us to try and look at that hour of golfers starting at sunrise and employees starting before that. That's how I guess I would have worded, if I'd rewritten the ordinance. Undestad: Just out of curiosity, how many total golfers do you plan on running through in a day? 55 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 John Kosmas: If you say you can do, oh what would be a good number, a foursome every eight minutes? If you're really on pace, you can do a foursome in eight minutes so if you're open and you really have that many people out there, it's a lot of people. And that's part of the reason for having them start earlier and doing some of the maintenance and cutting those greens because you've got to stay ahead of them. You can't do that while you're open. That type of thing you can't. You can't be on that green. Larson: Okay. Just one quick question. You may or may not know the answer to this. Are they planning on applying for a liquor license? John Kosmas: They're looking for a beer license. Larson: Okay. The reason I ask that is then, the course is open sunrise to sunset. Then you're talking people, they have to be off the course by sunset or do they off they premises by sunset? John Kosmas: I think that's a very good question. Larson: Because if they're going to go and finish up and go have a beer that puts them an hour later maybe? John Kosmas: I think they should be able to do that. Undestad: I think the reason for the sunrise/sunset is the lighting issue. If you don't want the lighting issues then you need to close the place down. Larson: Right. That's what I mean. It puts your lights later. Your lighting issues are later. John Kosmas: I happen to think I should be able to that. I think I should be able to play a good round of golf and I should be able to stop and have a sandwich and a beer or a sandwich and a pop and then leave. But if I go to the literal interpretation, and that's what I guess I've got to ask you to do, is look at that interpretation a little differently, because if I look at the literal interpretation, if sunset that day is at 8:30 it's closed. And there's a lot of light potentially after what we count as sunset. We talked about the sunset on the calendar, on the time clock as one thing, but actual sun's gone is anywhere from 45 minutes to an hour past... Larson: Lake zoning ordinances, like jet skis and small things, have to be off half and hour or an hour, whatever it is, before sunset. I should know that one. So that's what I mean. That might be something that needs to be discussed. That's all I have. John Kosmas: Like I said, I'd have loved to been in writing that ordinance because I would have written it... McDonald: Debbie? ZOm: I'm going to let Kurt go first. 56 Planning Commission M• g— February 7, 2006 • Papke: What's the designed lifetime of the buildings? How long are you designing these to last? John Kosmas: The club house building? Papke: Yes. John Kosmas: As long as you're residence. It's a long-term building. Papke: Okay. We're also the planning and zoning commission so we do have to take zoning considerations into issue here. So staff, this area is guided rural residential in 2020? Generous: Large lot. Papke: Large lot. So 2020 comes along and gets rezoned, what happens? John Kosmas: We stay there. Al-Jaff: The applicant needs to make a decision, do they want to continue the golf course use or do they want to change it to a residential use? Papke: But there's nothing that requires them to then stop operation of the golf course? Al-Jaff: It's a conditional use. There is a higher and better use with residential. Papke: But they can continue to operate this golf course until the year 2100, as long as the building doesn't fall over. AI-Jaff: Unless they violate the conditions of.. John Kosmas: My understanding is that you have some interim uses in your ordinances and I think that thought of an interim use would be applied but in this case its not an interim use. Al-Jaff: It's a conditional use. John Kosmas: It's a conditional use under the ag zoning. Papke: So coming back to, I think this issue of hours of operation is going to be crucial here from a city code perspective. In this case, taking into account somebody sitting at the bar having a beer and somebody mowing the greens. What constitutes hours of operation according to our city code? Al-Jaff: Sunrise to sunset. Papke: But what operations, what things can take place during that time period? After sunset... Generous: They cannot maintain. 57 Planning Commission Mee — February 7, 2006 • Papke: They cannot maintain. That's the way it's currently written? Al-Jaff: Correct. Papke: Do we enforce this? Al-Jaff: We haven't had a problem yet. I've never had a complaint. Papke: I'll make one now. Al-Jaff: Okay. Papke: On Bluff Creek. Al-Jaff: Done. McDonald: Okay. Debbie? Zorn: I want to hold my comments or my questions so that we can have the public hearing. Thanks. McDonald: Okay. I have got some questions for you. You talk about economics. Have you compared this course to the Chaska course the way it's run and operated? To me they're comparable. John Kosmas: My understanding is they have, are aware of how the Chaska course operates. McDonald: Do you know what the hours of operation are for that course? John Kosmas: No, I'd have to defer to that. The Chaska course? McDonald: No, the Chaska short course. It's over by Hazeltine. We didn't talk to the par 30 course but we talked to the town course and we're basically running the same as the town course. McDonald: You want to come in early and do the mowing and everything, but how can you do the mowing without light? John Kosmas: The lighting that you need for the level of lighting you need for the greens is strictly on the mower itself. There's no need for broad headlights or beacons of light to do that. McDonald: Okay. You've run through the economic numbers of what it takes to make it work and all such as that but one of the factors I think you need to put into that is that you're in a neighborhood, a residential neighborhood. That's why a lot of people are here today and you're W. 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 going to see a lot of pressure coming from us as far as the use of this course. I understand you have to make a profit. I understand you've done your numbers and you know what it's going to take to go through it but the problem that we're going to hold you up to that's a scrutiny that we're looking at on this is you've got to live within that neighborhood and we just don't want a lot of complaints. 'That's one of the things that we look at. The whole thing about the liquor license and those things. If you come back before us with that, you'll have a hard time getting that through, I'll tell you right now. I guess the reason I say all that is that we do look at this in the context of where it's at and my question is have you looked at that? There's a lot of complaints here. I've got a stack of emails. I've been getting calls constantly about this and what it comes down to is maybe it's a lack of cooperation or listening to your neighbors. The 25 to 15 -foot, it seems to me as though it's a small trade off but it would buy you a lot of good capital. What have you looked at as far as talking to the people within the neighborhoods. Have you held meetings with them? John Kosmas: No, we have not. It was a discussion to do that but there is also the understanding that it has been in front of you before and the neighbors were involved before and so we are basically working with that. McDonald: Okay. I guess the feeling that everybody has while you're back is these seem to be some rather drastic changes. This is not the deal everybody signed up for is kind of the feeling I'm getting from reading through all of this. I understand the issue about the lights but why wouldn't 15 -foot light poles work? John Kosmas: I'm not saying they don't work. I'm not saying that they do not work. They do not work in the configuration we have them set up right now and if 15 -foot is the number that you work with, we're going to have to have more lamps than what we're talking about with the six we're talking about. I don't recommend that. That's where I'm at with it. It doesn't make sense for the use of the property to put more of them around and start moving the lamps closer to someone who doesn't want them. I don't want to put them in your backyard. That's not the purpose. The purpose is to keep them away from you. McDonald: Does part of this come down to the resolution of what does sunrise to sunset mean? John Kosmas: It is some of that, yes. And the safety of the employee leaving and/or coming. ] don't want to send an employee out there in any business. I work at a nice little strip center in St. Louis Park and I really like it when that light's on over that door and lighting up that alley when I walk out the back door to go get in my car and I'm not small guy but I feel much better. When that thing's out, I let the landlord know. McDonald: I don't think any of us are saying anything about safety. We all agree with that. think the question comes down to how much lighting do we actually need to achieve that objective. The other question I've got concerns the building materials. Staff seems to have made a point about the ribbed metal. What I heard you talking about, I'm not sure that that's what you're talking about. Is there a difference of opinion there between you and staff or has something changed? 59 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 John Kosmas: I think it's a play on words. The metal building that we're talking about is a metal building that has a simulation of a standing seam and a board and batten type of look where it has a flat panel, a strip, a flat panel, not a corrugate, what I would call a corrugated... so I think it's just a matter of terminology. McDonald: Because when I think of ribbed, as you said, I think of corrugated but that wasn't what you presented. Okay. I have no further questions and I don't mean to be overbearing about all of this but it's just one of these things. There are a lot of questions about this coming back that it does appear things have changed from what we initially approved. John Kosmas: Hopefully I've made it obvious that it isn't that drastic of a change what we've done. It's more a clarification of what, I'm not picking on the people that were here before you before, but I think some of it should have been taken care before but I'm willing to carry the message afterwards now to try and get the answers squared away. Because I want these people to live with what's there. I like the building that we're developing. I think it's a good use. Therefore, let's bring it back and let's talk about it. McDonald: Okay. Let's see what everybody has to say and then we'll go from there. John Kosmas: Thank you. McDonald: Thank you. At this point we will open up the public meeting and what I would ask is that you step up to the podium, state your name and address and then address your comments to the Commission and we will try to get everyone in. Yes, sir. Boyd Peterson: Good evening. I'm Boyd Peterson. I live at 9860 Pioneer Circle. I'm the residence directly on the east side of it which puts me right on the second fairway. I'm the fellow with the big brown pole barn that was built in 1985. At that point in time there were farm fields, three nurseries, this and that. There wasn't these fancy buildings that we can do that with so I need to point that out. Other thing is these hours of operation. When those sprinklers go off, my house is probably, you know, 200 feet away. You would not believe how loud those sprinklers are when they're going off and they run them things unbelievably a lot. As far as lawn mowing, them lawn mowers run a lot and they start damn early in the morning and they seem like they are mowing all the time. Now that's a lot and it's right there. Another problem with, I mean I don't want to make any enemies with the applicant, but it may too late for a lot of that. I've been there since 1987. But the big problem I have and I was hoping there was a little bit of a buffer between my property and the second fairway and the original design of this course was great and happy and everybody that's here was really great and happy about this going. It was a real tame nine -hole course for the public and for the kids, older folks that can only go do nine and be done and a quick deal. I don't think there's anybody here really too stupid to see what's going on here. This is a master plan for bigger things. It's ridiculous. I was hoping for a little more of a buffer. I want to get back to that. I mean the applicant, he's well aware of what I was hoping for and well aware of what was on the original docket. As a matter of fact, I even took care of trees that were planted by myself. I drug 400 feet of hose around for months just so they could take care of the rest of the course. They had enough problems. I wanted this thing to work. Now, what I got is, they're mowing right up to the line fence and what happened to my 40 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 yards of weeds? What happened to my buffer? It's not there. I've got a dog. Okay, well keep your dog off of my course. Well, okay but what happened to my three, four feet of weeds for my dog wouldn't see a golfer running across. My dog don't see nobody over there, my dog ain't going to go there. I got four kids. My big concern is where my pole barn is. It's real close to the second tee box and I know damn well this is going to happen because there's a lot of golfers that have a few before they start their round. What's real convenient, and you're all welcome to come over to my place and look around all you want, the back side of my pole bam's a perfect place to walk over and relieve yourself. And I know that's going to happen and that's why I was hoping for a buffer. You're not going to walk through 30 yards of weeds with hopefully thistles. What it's supposed to be isn't happening and I don't want to make enemies with the applicant. That ain't what I'm trying to do. The applicant's well aware of all I really wanted. I got one pole barn with one light and you're all welcome to cover over after this meeting and see what one light does. That's all you need. I got kids running around all the time. I got cars coming and going. Why do you need all these lights. I could talk all night. It's obvious I'm a little frustrated on how it's gone at this point and nobody comes and asks me what would be nice. I thought that was all worked out but it isn't what's happening. I'll let other folks get up. Thank You. McDonald: Okay. I have a question for him. Sir, quick question for you. Do you have any concerns with golf balls hitting your pole barn? Boyd Peterson: I'm not a golfer, plain and simple. In talking to golfers and the original guy that was putting this all together, designed this so the balls are all drove nice effectively away from my property. I guess unless you put a pretty heavy hook on and there's been people say that's going to happen so there are going to be balls coming at my house and I'm hoping the first window that gets broke that the golf course takes care of it and puts in one that won't break again for when the next one hits. That was kind of a, in a sense, a verbal thing that was worked out just being a nice neighbor about stuff. I've got beautiful pines that have been there forever that are up there that I'm hoping they'll take care of a lot of that. I took care of a bunch of trees and I'm hoping they'll take care of that, too. I hope that answers your question. McDonald: Thank you. Next, please. David Gatto: Good evening, folks. I'm David Gatto. I live at 9631 Foxford Road. I'm going to represent the entire Lake Riley Woods Homeowners Association. Several members of the board are present tonight. In fact, the President is right there. I've been authorized by the board to speak on the behalf of all 37 families that live across the street and to the north of the golf course. I'll invite any other members of the association that are here tonight and present that do not agree with any of my comments to come forward or speak up and correct me. I want to say first that the association really encourages the development. I'm sorry, I'm going to kind of read this because I prepared these comments and I shared them with some other people and they listened so I've got some things to say but I'm going to read most of it. We encourage the development of the golf course and wish its management a great success with this current business model and as presented and approved in September of 2003. I know that myself and 61 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 several of the residents are eager to use the facility. We've been encouraged by it's positive visual impact. We feel the landscaping that has been completed is an improvement from even the beautiful nursery that was present there before. We know we could have something across the street that's far more detrimental and not as pleasant to view as a golf course so we don't want the Halla's to misconstrue our continents tonight in any way. We have a generally positive impression of the development and look forward to its completion and opening. Our first question to Halla's is when is this thing going to open? One of our concerns is this is going to become a white elephant and never open and that will be an embarrassment to Halla and the neighborhood out there. We want to plant that first question. So we understand it, the Planning Commission now has the discretion in approving or denying the site plan and is limited to whether or not the project complies with zoning ordinances. When we review the September I Sth conditional use permit, we want to acknowledge for the record again, the applicant did accept that City awarded them the permit with no exterior lighting except a safety light on the building, as we understood. Let's talk about safety for a minute, guys. Sharon and Kathy, would you stand up? This is the example of the kind of people that are out in our neighborhood after dark and before sunrise. These two ladies and several other ladies that are nearly identical to these ladies get up before the sun rises and walks around our neighborhood. Walks right down the street. Right down the bike path. Some of them walk entirely around Lake Riley and to my knowledge; we have not had any problems with safety. Now unless that some other kind of folks are brought into the neighborhood by this business, we don't think that there's going to be any problem with safety and we frankly don't understand all these needs and all this talk about protective of employees before the sun rises and after the sun sets over there, because we think that we've been pretty lucky with what we've got. We've got the following comments. We've got another question. The conditional use permit states the applicant is going to provide a pedestrian bikeway connection to the City's trail system at the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Pioneer Trail. We want to know, Mr. Chairman, when Halla's going to complete that connection. So far we haven't seen any evidence that they've even begun that. Then also, we want a copy, the Lake Riley Woods Homeowners Association needs a copy of the hydro geologic study that's regarding the impact to the surrounding wells that's referenced on page 5 of 18, condition number 13. I want to comment for the record tonight more about this watering and the irrigation system. I personally observed the watering and specifically during the month of September when we received over 10'% inches of water. I had to go out and get my newspaper one morning with an umbrella because it was raining so hard, and as I glanced over at the nursery, they were pouring out irrigation water onto that (shag field?) during a heavy rainstorm. You know, all of us neighbors have talked a lot and we're really sensitive to our common water supply and our wells out there and really don't see the need to operate a commercial golf course sprinkler system during heavy rain events. We wonder if the golf course has any sensors integral to their system or can be added to their system that will preclude the system from working, especially during a heavy rain. Now I know that I can override my automatic sprinkler system and I do when it rains or when it gets so wet in here and that usually occurs different times in the summer. We just shut the irrigation system off. So we're wondering if the golf course can do the same for us. We also would like to review the Carver County, the letter dated August 29, 2003 and a MnDOT letter dated 8/26/03. We'd like to look at all this prior to the City Council meeting which this matter is going to be under consideration. The reason I say all that is because I've got some comments in their personally and this applicant has shown time and time again their lack of consideration for what is actually permitted. In other words, the City of Chanhassen 62 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 tells them they are permitted to do and they go about their own business and they do things that are not consistent with the permit. So we feel that would be better if we just go ahead and double check it ourselves, too. We now know the reason for the parking lot lighting. It kind of was a mystery to us but it's clear after we read the application items number 5 and 8, and I think everybody's been alluding to this, that this applicant is really trying to have a future driving range with lights, a future miniature golf range with lights, and some sort of future evening operations that revolve something around maybe coffee and a sandwich shop, maybe more. I mean there's no way we can tell. But its really clear that the applicant desires to kind of step up his business model. I mean, he came here and everybody, as everybody's been saying, was really happy in 2003 that we were going to have a executive golf course and we were all going to be able to use it like Mr. Peterson said during the day, and now we're back here and we're talking about massive buildings, different kinds of uses, all kinds of lights in the parking lot for safety reasons, and we can see that the technique here is to come in and ask for more variances on top of the conditional original intent and permit and we flatly don't like it, obviously. So the facility is only needed to operate between sunset and we really wonder why safety lights are needed during the day like everybody's been talking about. I guess Mr. Papke, you must have read my notes before the meeting because you got most of my, you've already talked about most of my ideas. I was going to talk about, and so I'm not even going to waste too much of this, but I was going to talk about the lighting pollution. I mean, these folks talk about lighting that is downblasted and has so many foot candles and so forth at the property line, but we all know that what really in effect happens is I don't care what color, flat black, those lights are going to reflect off we're going to have light pollution. When it snows, if those lights are on, and these guys want to operate in the winter, its going to reflect off the snow and it's really going to be bright. And it is true, we can see the lights from Mystic Lake in the south end of Chanhassen real clearly. And it is true, I can look to the sky in the south, I can look to the sky in the west, not everybody knows this, but all of our neighbors get together a lot of nights and we try to count the number of satellites we can see fly over the City, the skies and its really nice in that part of Chanhassen still and we just don't want to lose it. So, now I do have a, I got a trump card. I can't believe nobody else has said this tonight. I want to make note that the Bluff Creek Golf Course does not have any parking lot lights. I don't know that everybody understands that. I drove over there today because I was curious and that's kind of what I thought. That seems to be a pretty successfully golf course and one that has never kicked anybody off because of sunset and you can get pretty decent tee times in the morning and I've never felt threatened by any kind of safety. You know, I golf all the time folks and these guys talk about going and doing their maintenance before the golfers get there. That would be pretty hi-fi, because I can't remember too many times when I was the first golfer on the course and I didn't have go ahead and put through the moisture and dew on the golf greens, or I didn't have to wait for the guy to mow off the golf green before I was putting on it. There's a lot of us in here in this room that are golfers and we know the way golf courses work. We agree with the City on the denial of the extended hours, the increased traffic, the lighting, the noise, the disruptions after dark are going to impair our property values. I notice your ordinances are full, your ordinances are full of those words, things that impair property values, things that diminish property values, things that impact property values. That's the kind of thing where somebody's going to come look at our house if we want to sell it. I know that some people in my neighborhood have their houses directly from that golf course for sale right now and that individual told me just tonight that he didn't buy his house next to a parking lot and he doesn't this house next to a parking lot, and I'm sure that the 63 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 people that are going to try to buy this house don't want to buy a house that's next to a parking lot. So it's probably pretty obvious that that's going to diminish the value of that property. The maintenance building, I mean, we don't agree with the increased size of this maintenance building. We're trying to figure out why you need a maintenance building that big for a golf course of this size and I don't think that's been clearly demonstrated even though we've seen lots of diagrams here tonight. A 32 -foot by 24 -foot ball washing building is kind of curious also. I have been to a lot golf courses and the ball washing buildings and the buildings that dispense those golf balls, and I'm talking about the Hazeltine golf course, it isn't any bigger than this little space here between all these desks and Hazeltine golf course uses that and I think that's a pretty good golf course. The Deer Run Golf Course over in Victoria has got just that little building that does the same thing so I guess it's not clear to me what 32 to 24 -foot is going to be used for, in addition to 100 -foot long maintenance buildings. It's kind of interesting. These larger buildings and more buildings on this property are certainly going to impact the visual appearance of the property and again potentially impact our property values. We want to agree, a comment that we agreed with the staff recommendation that all the buildings be consistent with the wood exterior, whatever you approve. I mean the steel exterior skin would certainly be something that we're not used seeing. Mr. Peterson's got some metal buildings over there. I live across the street from him. I can't see them. He's got plenty of trees around them, it was built a long time ago, and it's just not going to be out in a new golf course. Finally, let's talk about non-compliance. I've got a specific one for you. The neighbors have noticed that the underground wiring is indeed presently installed for the lighting of the parking lot. Mr. Chairman, some of our neighbors want to know why we were all subjected to very strict compliance and inspections during construction of our homes; however, this applicant has been allowed to install items while they're clearly inconsistent with his present permit. We just don't understand how that happens. Additionally, they've admitted tonight that the permit says that the berm is going to be I0 -foot high on Pioneer Trail and they simply said, aw gosh we can't do that. I guess we don't understand that attitude. I would have had a hard time telling the inspectors that when I built my house that geez the plan said that I can't have that drain box under my garage but I just can't do that. I want a drain box so I'm going to put it there. That's that tough things for us normal people to understand. So I'm going to do a quick summary here that we do not agree to the staff recommendation to the City Council to approve these amendments to the conditional use permit for parking lot lights and drive aisle lighting. We just don't think they need any lighting. I do agree, Mr. Papke, if you really wanted to come to some sort of agreement, the short path lightings, we would talk about those. That's a great idea and we actually had that idea tonight. We were talking about that over pizza before we carne up here. We don't feel the applicant has really shown this facility is different from other facilities engaged in the exact same business. In fact, the business that Bluff Creek is in is enhanced. Bluff Creek is the closer of this golf course, and not an executive golf course and so they're in the same business in Chanhassen and actually directly adjacent to the same property we're talking about. We don't see any real comments or valid documentation from the applicant to support that the lighting after dark will in any way provide a safer environment for the public during the period from sunrise to sunset. We do not agree that the applicant should be given the opportunity to put commercial lighting of any type on the property just because the local ordinances provide them for safety. They were permitted to have lights on their building for safety. That's exactly what Bluff Creek has. Bluff Creek has a very standard double fixture on one end of the building. I noticed that was pointing where all the carts were parked on the side of the building as I drove through there today and that's all 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 there is. So, I'm sure a lot of other people want to talk; I have just spoken for 37 people, so thank you very much. McDonald: Thank you. Anyone else? Judy Walstad: Hi. My name is Judy Walstad. I live at 10071 Great Plains Boulevard. Our property would be on the south side of the golf course directly behind the, we have a private road, and we are directly behind the driving range. Could I just confirm first of all that you did receive an email from Dave Walstad dated February Oh? McDonald: Yes. Judy Walstad: Alright. Thank you. I would just like to say I do have concerns with the lawn mowing. I guess I didn't realize that they started or considering starting that early. I have to say I was shocked about hearing any winter usage because on page 2 of the 18 -page proposal it says operations shall be seasonal and limited to sunrise and sunset. I've always assumed the golf course was summer, luckily in the spring sometimes and in the fall, but I never heard of it for winter usage. I might just add to my neighbors to the north that I haven't met yet, but in a comment with the lighting in the parking lot and cars leaving, I think we should consider that headlights on a car, on a vehicle are not on the ground, they are three to four feet off the ground; therefore, you might be getting some of that headlight projected into your properties. Since we live directly across from the driving range, the range actually butts up to our front yard, my first area of concern is regarding the demand for lights on the driving range, and I guess that's going to be discussed in the future but I would just like to state while I have an opportunity that I'm adamantly against lights on the driving range. I would also be opposed to the proposed future miniature golf course and lights involved in those and the parking lot lights. Also, I didn't know about the fights on the maintenance building that would be right in our path of vision. I would not be comfortable with lights on that building. In addition to the lighting, if the concern if truly for personal safety and not for property protection or to generate income, and it's deemed necessary to have parking lot lights, I feel they should be put of timers to shut off after the business is closed. We do not support all night lighting solely for personal property protection. If that's the major concern we feel the applicant should handle that protection with alarm systems. I am vehemently opposed to extended hours 6 to 11 p.m. and being open year round. I feel that this is an operation that occurs in the prime season of the year and they are running from sunrise to sunset, 7 days of the week already and I feel there should be no extension of these two items. This is not zoned as a business district and we don't want it to become one. I would like to mention during the construction of the golf course a berm was placed directly north of our private road. This was not in line with the original plan and we are concerned that this will cause water to drain onto our road causing pot holes and increased maintenance costs. And I do understand the private road was mentioned earlier tonight. That would need to be handled separately. But I would like to say that that berm was not intended to be there and it was not in compliance with the plan that was proposed to us earlier. The drainage was supposed to go into their drainage ponds. I just wanted to mention that and feel that this needs to be addressed. Landscaping: I would like to say I am very pleased with the evergreen trees placed directly across from our driveway and I have faith in the manager and crew upon putting those in. I feel that this project though is still in process regarding the south side of the golf course along the Gom 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 private road. It is hard to know where they are since they did not go by their original proposal again so I would like in writing what they are doing to complete this project. I wanted to mention there is that driving range they talked about earlier that's one mile south of our property and I would like to comment that it is open year round and what is convenient with that property is there are no residents in the area so I think that is fabulous and there's not any conflict there. In closing, the following is a list of things that should be clarified in writing so there are no misunderstandings between the applicant and the neighbors: A map site with all the building locations. I was really kind of surprised to see the map proposed has two buildings. It does not show, I did see it tonight, but it does not show where all four buildings were to be located. Explanation of continued landscaping process. Definition of sunrise and sunset. Again, what golf patrons, when they're expected to leave the property, including the club house. I would like to have in writing that the private road not be used for Halla Green purposes. That again may need to be handled elsewhere. We would like, if this is possible, to have the intentions for the use of the road, if they plan to do so, in writing. I would like to see denial of the miniature golf course and the lights of the driving range to be in writing also. I think that's it and I thank you very much for your time. McDonald: Thank you very much. Would anyone else like to come up? Gaye Guyton: Good evening. My name is Gaye Guyton and I live right behind Judy Walstad, 10083 Great Plains Boulevard. First of all, I know this evening has gotten so late and you all look so tired so thank you for staying and listening. I'm very concerned about this, and I was one of those optimistic people who was here telling you we were really in favor and excited about this golf course. In 2003 I spoke in favor of it. Ron Saatzer was really good at coming to visit with us neighbors and just running things by and making sure we were all on the same page and we've seen that change. The initial things that you approved in 2003, some of you were here and some were different, were the four things that we're most concerned with. The hours of operation were going to be seasonal and again, hours of operation were going to be from sunrise to sunset, not prior and later. There was going to be no outdoor speaker system, no commercial kitchen, and no exterior lighting with the exception of safety lights on the building. I have been on my property for about a dozen years at this point and I have seen that Mr. Halla has just pushed and pushed and pushed with so many other things and that's why we brought up the private road issue. hi 2003 there was supposed to be some of that orange construction fabric running between the edge of the golf course and the private road so that none of the heavy equipment would come up and down and that was one of the things that was spelled out on that evening that everything was approved and so, to and behold the orange fabric went up and then they came and they ripped it down so they could use it for the those. The hours being seasonal are now getting pushed. The sunrise to sunset limits have been pushed. We haven't heard yet about an outdoor speaker system and I hope that's not going to happen. The commercial kitchen not being permitted in the club house was so that there would be no long-range, long -hour thing. It was supposed to just be a spot for kids to nun in and get a Coke, have a sandwich, it wasn't supposed to be a place for people to stay long after their golf game. There's lots of other golf courses in the area if people would like to do that. They certainly could but this was a different type of golf course that was being proposed at that time and it just seems like it's changed a lot. I'd like to talk just for a minute about the exterior lighting. We had seen in what you all had written that you had said this, "Just as granting the extended business hours in the variance will 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 be considered an annoyance to the neighbors in the early morning and evening hours contrary to the original use permit, so will these lights be considered a nuisance. I'm not here to quibble with you. If you say we need to have three 15 -foot lights for safety, that's fine. But I'm starting to get very concerned when they say okay and then there's one by the maintenance building that's going to be shining right into Dave and Judy Walstad's area. There's not that much topography there. It's pretty flat. We can right out to Pioneer Trail right now. It's not a nice, rolling area. It's got little dips but it's not rolling. On page 13 in the booklet that you all did you talked about the sound and site buffers and preservation of views and with not only those lights going in, and again keeping those to a minimum. If we need to have three low I can go along with that but those other buildings and other things, it's really going to change that comer. Mr. Halla does not have bright lights on during the night at his nursery. This is something I've told him repeatedly. The nursery's also called in the past to ask are they being good neighbors. That's never happened with the golf course and so one of the things I've had chance to tell the nursery when they've called is how much we appreciate the lights being low or dark at night. That area is so dark that we are some of the people who come out between sunset and sunrise to be able to look at the start, shooting stars, in August where there's all the comets and things going by. It's a really special place so that's an important thing. I thank you for you all to consider. If the golf course opens and dawn and closes at dusk, I also don't understand why it's so important that there be all those lights there anyway. There's no one going to be there. They also have not really complied with the original landscaping plan at this point. There is a gentleman there named Eric Olson and he's been really good about trying to tell us what he's doing but they have been changing things and so again, I don't know if it's just that they're not going to do it and they're just doing what they have with the trees they have, but they were supposed to be on the plan a whole lot of little shrubby plants that were planted right at the end of the driving range. Those have not gone in. They've put in a berm and some nice pine trees but again, they're just changing things that were on the original plan. Also, when the architect's mentioned, kind of haphazardly, that oh well, the club house is only about 4,000 square feet and that's just like the houses that are in the area, there are no houses in our area that have 4,000 square feet on one floor. That's much, much bigger than our area. To come back to the gravel road just for a second, even though it's private, I just am making this point to show that Mr. Halla has over and over the years, as long as I've been there, kind of disregarded the rules of the City and the guidelines from you pertaining to that rad and what it was supposed to be used for. Since the Halla trees no longer exist I believe there's no valid reason for the Halla trucks to utilize this road anymore. It's just meant to bean easement and not a commercial road and it was one of the things again in the original use permit or conditional use permit that MnDOT was asking what part that road had in the plans for the golf course and as far as we knew, the answer was none. At this point they're using it with their heavy equipment that tears up the road and Mr. Hall does not put money into the repair for the road at all. It is our private road. At this point, the current business use for him to use it is for access to the golf course or accessing the ravine for dumping. It has nothing to do with the nursery so if there's anything that you can do within the limits of having the plan and MnDOT looking at that be considered outside the realm of the golf course, we would really appreciate whatever you could do. We're not in favor of year round business. It seems more suited to a commercially zoned area and if that's what Mr. Halla wants there are other areas where he could do that. This is a landscaping and agricultural area with neighborhoods and so we believe that the original conditional use permit that you gave were 67 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 given so well and thoughtfully, that to come back with all those changes now really changes the heart of what the business was. Thank you very much. McDonald: You're welcome. Thank you. Next? Step right up. State your name and address and address your comments to the Commissioners. Tom Gertz: Commissioners, good evening. Good late evening. My name is Tom Gertz. I live at 10001 Great Plains Boulevard. That's on the southwest comer of the property. I'll show you a map of that in a minute. First off I would like to say that I'm very pro business. I'm very pro small business. This expansion into the golf course really means more jobs created. That's a good thing. Everyone's going to get on board with that. I don't have any qualms with the majority of the proposals that fall within the current ordinances and guidelines. I have no issues there. My issues come with some earlier matters and some current ones which I've actually just learned tonight. I think when you choose to develop a golf course in an area surrounded by residential areas, there should be some caveats. There have to be some limitations there versus if it was surrounded by a commercial site. I've done some golfing. I think I've golfed in both kinds of environments and I do see differences in certain rules and regulations that apply. And in all due respect to the applicant speaking earlier, it's easy to make the case, to make it sound reasonable that we need lights for safety, we have employees that are going to come in early. They have to mow the lawns and maintenance has to be done prior to sunrise and afterwards I want to stop and have a beer before I go home. I agree. On the surface that sounds great. The problem again, this is a residential neighborhood. I believe there has to be some kind of noise ordinance in place for the lawn turf people. I believe they can't start blowers and mowers and things before 7:00 am. I don't know that specifically but I know that there are guidelines for that. I would think that those probably are a good model to apply to a golf course as well. Let me show you where I live. Right here. I'm definitely the closest adjacent to this property line ... entire golf course. In the first home on the private road, that private road has five property owners and four dwellings on it. I do happen to bear probably the brunt as my adjacent neighbors of the traffic, commercial traffic, this flotilla of commercial vehicles that is building and developing the golf course. On the surface of that, I tolerate that without great problem during the construction phase of this. I understand you have to access your golf course. There's other way but the straightest line and my property lies between the straightest line between two points so they cross the property. He does have a legal easement to do such. I don't know that that transcends into his flotilla of commercial vehicles but during this construction phase it goes both ways. Neighbors have to be neighborly. I do have issue with the fact that there is no effort in putting in maintenance of that road. We as the private property owners have to do it. I understand it's a private issue but I hope that that relationship will get better and not worse because it's been a bone of contention for some time. I'm up here on the backs of other people's speeches so I'll try not to fracture this out, but the crux of the matter for me is operational hours, simple and clear. In warm weather you have your windows open. If mowers are running at 5:00, how am I not going wake up? If operation hours are extended into a 10:00, 11:00, 12:00 night, whatever it may be or end up in actually, and I have to listen to pinging golf balls and doors slamming in the parking lot. That's not a NIMBY issue with me. It's a quality of life issue. I get to sleep. If you do a little quick math of a party of four taking off every eight minutes depending on if they all go together or go separately, that can be 50-200 cars within that hour needing to service that area, something like that. It was quick math. Now that's on a prime M, Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 • day. That's a lot of doors slamming at 10:00 and 11:00 at night and I am within proximity of that and I will hear that so that's one of my issues on that point. As far the, going back to the original agreement, the vegetative borders, it has not been installed adjacent to my property. Again, I'm the closest one. I have spoke with Eric who's present here tonight and he's been good to work with and per Eric that it's forthcoming, but it still hasn't. There just hasn't been any progress on that point so I just really wanted to go on record to say that that is still an issue for me. I hope that that still comes to fruition, one so that there's just a natural barrier for golfers not to impede upon my property whether they're chasing golf balls and as the other gentleman stated, may be relieving themselves. I think I'm at the furthest point from the club house. That would be nice to get that natural barrier in there. Drainage, I would like to go on record additionally saying I want no additional drain file installed and drained over my property. There was excavation and drain tile installed across my road on my property without my permission. I took issue with that immediately and I don't know the watershed area that's being drained but it's probably several acres, maybe greater. Eric was very responsive to that and he did install a pipe that runs over my property so it will not erode it and I appreciate that and currently if that holds up that will be fine. If you'd go back to the original agreement you can see that the requirements were for the vegetative barrier and the type of vegetation. I just ask that that be honored or if there's a deviation in that, come talk tome. I'm a pretty easy guy to work with. I think that's my big talking points and I actually know Bluff Creek didn't have lights a while back. Again, lighting in a much lower grade fashion is probably the desirable thing. It is a very dark neighborhood and there is some benefit to that but my biggest issues comes down to extended hours meaning more noise. It's unavoidable. I wish the endeavor well in success to be profitable but again, within the understanding that it's a neighborhood and there has to be some adjustments. Thank you. McDonald: Thank you very much. Next? Tom Jessen: Good evening. My name is Tom Jessen. I live at 9570 Foxford Road. I'm part of the Lake Riley Woods Homeowners. The primary issue I'd like to address is traffic safety and the intersection which is the main entrance to the golf course and it's also the main exit point that I go to every day to work. I'm afraid you're creating an unsafe traffic issue there. Where my home is at now I watch traffic accidents take place on Highway 101 on that sharp curve that goes north of the intersection of the Highway 101 and Pioneer Trail and it's a dangerous situation that's there and also living in the neighborhood for 13 years, I've had trouble adapting to get this hill to leave home every morning and get onto Pioneer Trail and to do it safely. All the people that are exiting that golf course will be facing the same kind of issue. When traffic comes through there it's going 50-55 miles an hour and with the stop lights that's there, they're coming from the west at a high rate of speed. If you don't pull out properly and pick your opening to get out in the traffic stream, it's very likely going to have some accidents in that area and as related to the issue of drinking and late hours, that intersection is going to be even more dangerous. I was surprised that there wasn't a traffic light involved with them. One time going to work pulling out from that intersection I had a car come up from 101 and Pioneer Trail intersection and he didn't like the way I merged onto the traffic and he rode my bumper all the way to Flying Cloud Drive within 10 feet of my car. If you look at the traffic situation there, I'd say that's something that needs to be looked into, especially with after-hours operation or dark operation with cars coming and going there. Thank you. K' 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 McDonald: Thank you. Would anyone else like to come up and address the Commission? Okay. Seeing no one get up, the public meeting is closed and I will bring the meeting back to the Commission for our review and discussion. Who would like to start or who would like to go last? Papke: I'll go first before I collapse. McDonald: Okay, Kurt? Papke: Okay. I have the honor of driving by this site twice per day on my commute so I've had the opportunity to observe the construction and so one and my kudos to the applicant on the landscaping. It's really spectacular, I think. The plantings, the waterfall, the boulderscape and so on, very very nice and the club house looks very nicely designed. The maintenance building gives me cause for pause. I'm not going to make any allusions or inferences here but just as a data point for the rest of the Commissioners, the last time I remember Mr. Halla making an application to the Planning Commission, it was to build another building in the nursery for raising koi and that was denied so he has a track record of requesting additional building sites so just a data point there, just for the folks that weren't around back at that point. I'm very concerned with the ambient lighting. As was stated by a number of the residents, I live down in this area, it's very dark and it's amazing how much the lighting carries down there so I think we have to be very sensitive to that. The same thing with the noise issues. I live across from Bluff Creek Golf Course and my bedroom faces the golf course and I can very clearly hear them when they fire up the mowers and 5:00 a.m. or whatever during the summer so it carries for a long way down there. One of my concerns here overall and this is kind of where I was going with the zoning issues, I have a concern that this has grown from what was kind of a mom and pop type operation that was very limited in scope, to something that is now snowballed. When you get into this kind of a situation as a business owner, you make an investment and you want to make it profitable and sometimes in order to do that you need to invest even more and so what I see happening here is I seen fireplaces planned for the club house, I see what looks like almost like a bar situation, the screened -in porches on both sides, the increased maintenance size. It just looks like there's a tremendous investment that's going into this and I just have a concern that we're going to see the applicant back again looking to enhance this site even more to make this more like a commercial site which is why I think some of the comments from the public were coming from. What was originally kind of a mom and pop outfit in a residential neighborhood is now starting to resemble a commercial enterprise and I just have a concern that we're creeping into something that we didn't earlier anticipate. Last but not least, there were a couple comments about the water supply and the wells and this was a major issue when it came before the Planning Commission last time. There was a lot of concern about the impact on the water supply. I haven't heard anything since then as this being an issue so as far as I'm aware and beard since then that there weren't any legal issues or code issues surrounding this one. Overall, I have a lot of worries but at the end of they day, once again we're looking at what do we approve as a Planning Commission with the proposal in front of us. I think if we can work something with the lighting, if we're very specific and stringent about the hours of operation here, I think it's a reasonably workable proposal but I think we're going to need to nail down a couple of these things to make sure that we don't stray outside the boundaries. 70 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 McDonald: Thank you. Zorn: My comments. This was the first time that I was able to read through this application and not being on the Commission in 2003, I've been struggling to try and understanding what the 2003 proposal was that was accepted at that time and what the changes are and it really seems that there's different levels of, public members here feel that the proposed plan is significantly different while the applicant indicates that it isn't. My observation I feel is that the zoning isn't, does not seem to be matching up what is before us this evening. The increased lights, the lights for safety reasons, the larger buildings, really do suggest a larger operation here. Once these large buildings are in place that will lead to more profitably and that is what is concerning, especially wanting to max out the number of golfers per day. I think that traffic and noise and additional lighting, I think all of that is peripheral to how this conditional use is interpreted. The hours of operation, I think we need to be very strict in considering this area and that operation, meaning that a sprinkler cannot tum on before 7:00 a.m. I'm strict in that way. I live in an area that's under construction right now and no one can start their saws or radios before 7:00 a.m. I feel like that shouldn't be any different for a business operation in a residential area. Sprinklers, all of that. I guess have some great concerns in changing the materials also relate back to the surrounding cedar was a very nice choice. Moving towards a metal just seems to be less of a fit for the area. I guess I'm struggling a little because this is new to me but I just feet like there are some big concerns and if we can work with the lighting and perhaps, I guess some other aspects but, I would not be for this at this point. McDonald: Okay. Deborah? Larson: Okay. A couple of the issues I want to bring up is one of the first things that the citizens brought up was it's a safe neighborhood so the crime issue to me and safety lights and having to have the 25 -foot poles just doesn't seem completely necessary at this time. I've lived in Chanhassen 21 years and I've seen it go from farms everywhere to pretty much city and everything else going on. However, one thing the neighborhoods have not taken into consideration is that there is growing population happening, quite a lot of it. We've seen a lot of new neighborhoods going in and high-density homes and other things maybe a little be further west to you. That is going to cause more cars, more people, more everything and so that's something you guys need to think about. It is a growing city and that's progress and that's what happens. That's how towns grow. So, both sides of the fence on that one. I really would prefer to see if we're going to do some sort of lighting, I love the idea. In fact, I was thinking about it, Kurt, when you brought up the short ones. Some of the golf courses that we go to up north, that's what they've got. These low things and they illuminate the ground and their non -obtrusive and they do sufficient lighting so I'd like to see maybe some more feedback into that. I'm not happy with what I'm hearing from the citizens about what the original plan was and what the Halla's have been doing since which aren't quite consistent with what they originally planned to do and the fact that the City hasn't seen it our caught it and I think it maybe needs to be scrutinized more. Hours of operation, I think we also need to be very strict on that. I for one also have my windows open in the summertime and I want to go out and scream at the people that start mowing at 5:00 a.m. I think it's wrong to have the caliber of machines that are going to be out there doing the courses. It's going to be loud. It's going to be a lot and I think that does 71 9 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 need to be scrutinized. The thing if they do get a liquor license, that's also too to consider. Hours of operation, I think it should be everybody needs to be off the premises at a given time and it needs to be like and hour before sunset or at sunset, something. For the sake of the citizens, it needs to be a safety issue again if people are going to be pounding down a lot of beers afterwards and that could be a growing problem. That's all I have. McDonald: Okay. Mark? Undestad: The only comment I'm going to have here tonight is with all the issues that are going on and it doesn't sound like there was a lot of communications between the applicant and the neighborhood and the changes that have gone on here and kind of the way we're heading here it doesn't look like we're going to be able to resolve these issues on exactly how can we nail down what are these times and issues with hours of operation. What are our lighting options and some of that stuff. We should maybe send them back to kind of look at, bring some more options back as far as lighting and come up with something that makes sense for hours of operation. If you use the sunrise to sunset, it keeps ticking off through the season. There just are a lot of issues on this matter that are unresolved right now. McDonald: Okay. Dan? Keefe: I'll try to keep my comments fairly short. I'm disappointed that the applicant hasn't met with the neighbors, particularly given where the previous owner was and then where the site is and the surrounding neighbors. I think they should have made a bigger effort to engage the local residents. I'm concerned with, I'm going to consider it the incrementalism. I kind of look as this as we'll try to continue to try and build this thing and we'll add on, we'll add on, we'll add on to make it a fairly low-cost business site. I'm a business guy and I kind of understand that but I'm concerned just about the location here and the lack of working with the local residents to try and get a proper fit. I'm against the lights. I just don't have enough evidence on the safety issue. I liked the comment on Bluff Creek Golf Course. I'm just not convinced on the need for safety. I think that links in a little bit to the incrementalism and I have a concern there. The conditional use permit I think would be alright but I would want to amend what is stated here on number 9. In regards to the site plan review, I'm generally okay with it. I like the landscaping like Kurt said. I think they're doing a great job there. Generally the site plan, yeah the buildings are bigger but if you look at the alternative to go maybe to residential or something like that, you look at the number of buildings and go well, its a few buildings. So I'm generally okay with the site plan. I'm in agreement with the City in regards to the denial on the variances which would be to not allow the corrugated metal or allow the golf course to be open from 6:00 am. to 11:00 p.m. Essentially we revert back to the other one which is sunrise to sunset as I understand it. Those are my comments. McDonald. Well, I'm not quite sure where to begin. I guess the first thing is that I understand the arguments that the applicant makes as far as the economics. You have to do what you've got to do within your particular business in order to make money. That being said though, as I've said before, a deal is a deal is a deal. We had an applicant in here earlier that wanted to change a deal that had been made as far as the wetlands. We denied it. I see this as creeping commercialism. Everybody agreed in the beginning as to what this was going to be. Both sides 72 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 • said that this would work. We can live with it. We can go forward with it and it will be a great addition to the neighborhood. Suddenly, we're all told this wasn't quite it. It needs to change because of these reasons and those reasons and I guess I'm really disappointed because one of the things that seems to work the best when you want to make changes is you will talk to your neighbors and you will get at least as much support as you possibly can so that there is at least a couple that will speak in favor of what you are wanting to do. As I said in the beginning, I've got a pile of emails. I've got a bunch of emails here. Staff's gotten calls. We have been inundated with everybody speaking against this and for a number of reasons. The big thing is, they're afraid this is going to grow into a big retail outlet where food, drink, whatever, you name it is going to expand. I do have concerns is that the next thing is you'll be in here asking for lights for the driving range. That was not in the bargain. The issues of safety, I'm not sure what safety we're talking about. At one time I thought we were talking about individual safety of going back and forth in a darkened lot to get to a car. Well, if that's what it is I agree. That doesn't require 15 or 25 -foot lights. I think you can light a parking lot so that you can safely get back and forth to a vehicle. If you're talking about crime, that's different. Maybe that is the 15 to 25 -foot lights but as has been said, this is not an area with a history of crime. I don't know of any place within Chanhassen right now with a history of crime that it requires that type of scrutiny. Because of that, I have to tell you I can't support any of this and where I am at is that the original permit that was agreed to and bargained with in the beginning, that is the deal and unless there are better reasons than just economic to change this, I could not support it. With that being said, I'm open for a motion from the Commissioners. Papke: I'll get one going here just so we have something to deal with. I make a motion that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the following motions. Conditional Use Permit as stated in the staff report. Condition number 9 I would like to change the height of the light pole may not exceed four feet instead of the 15 feet stated. The motion includes conditions 1-9 as stated in the staff report and then amended as I just mentioned. I would also like to add condition number 10 that the hours of operation will be sunrise to sunset as previously stated and that will include and mowing and customer traffic outside of those hour are prohibited. The second motion is I'd like to make a motion that the City Council denies Variance Planning Case 05-39 and I would like to amend it as stated in the staff report. I'd like to remove the term "corrugated" so it will state "denies variance for metal to be used as the exterior material and I'd like to clarify this to say "and denies variance to allowance of the golf course to be open from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. because I think there's too much ambiguity in the way its stated there so I want to make sure its clear that both of those are being denied. McDonald: Do I have a second? Zorn: Second. McDonald: I have a second. I have a question for the Commission. Do we need to vote on these individually as each one or is this one big? Each one? Just one? Okay. Having said that along with the changes that Kurt has made, all in favor, say aye. Papke: Did you want to ask for any friendly amendments? 73 0 Planning Commission Meeting— February 7, 2006 McDonald: Does anybody want to ad any friendly amendments? Keefe: Could you restate your number 10 again? Papke: Number 10 is that specifically the hours of operation will remain sunrise to sunset and specifically no mowing nor customer traffic allowed outside of those hours of operation. Undestad: Do we need to put anything in there as far as the seasonal stuff too? What are they doing? How long? Papke: I don't think they're going to mow during the winter. Larson: Yeah, but they wanted to have operations year round so do we want to friendly amend that it's spring through fall? McDonald: In that case, what you're wanting to do is to stick to the original agreement which was hours of operation shall be seasonal and limited to sunrise to sunset. Papke: What's seasonal? If we're going to do that we should state what is seasonal. Larson: Lack of snow and ice? McDonald: Well, that's one of the problems with some of this is, what is seasonal and what is sunrise to sunset? Larson: And when we have that 80 -degree day in November? McDonald: I'm not sure that we as a Planning Commission can define those particular terms. All we can do is say you must adhere to it and if you want clarification that's above our paid rate. Papke: Was there a friendly amendment there Deborah, or not? Larson: Yes. Well, no because it's already there. Zorn: Kurt, could you please repeat your motion so I make certain I vote accurately? Papke: The motion is as stated in the staff report with the following exceptions. The first exception is a change to condition number 9 to limit the height of the light pole to four feet. The second change is to add amendment number 10 which prohibits mowing and customer traffic outside of the allowed hours of operation which is sunrise to sunset, and the third change is to remove corrugated from the denial of the variance so it denies a variance for metal to be used, so this would not be a metal building in any shape or form. Also, make sure that we deny the extension of the golf course hours. 74 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 McDonald: So I think that what you're saying is the course would be open from sunrise to sunset? Papke: Yes. Period. McDonald: Any other amendments or clarifications? Okay. Papke moved, Zorn seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve an amendment to Conditional Use Permit #20034 CUP, Planning Case 05-39 for the construction of a golf course with a club house as shown in plans dated received January 6, 2006, with the following amendment to condition 9 of the existing conditional use permit and the addition of condition 10: 9. No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety lights which includes parking lot lights and drive aisle lights. The height of the light pole may not exceed 4 feet. All light fixtures must meet ordinance requirements. 10. Mowing and customer traffic outside of the allowed hours of operation which is sunrise to sunset is prohibited. Papke and Zorn voted in favor, Undestad, Keefe, McDonald and Larson voted in opposition. The motion failed with a vote of 2 to 4. Papke moved, Zorn seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve an amendment to Site Plan Review #2003-7 SPR, Planning Case 05-39 for the construction of a club house, a maintenance building, a golf ball washing building and a lean-to for a golf course as shown in plans dated received January 6, 2006, with the following added conditions: 1. Applicant shall increase landscape plantings to meet minimum requirements for parking lot trees. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the City prior to City Council approval. 2. Applicant shall fully screen parking lots from adjacent roadways through the use of berming or increased landscaping. 3. The applicant must submit detailed architectural plans for the maintenance building, golf ball washing building and lean-to that meet the design ordinance requirement. 4. Comply with all conditions of the MnDot review letter dated November 23, 2005. 5. The temporary 120 square foot octagon building is permitted for a maximum of 12 months from the day the City Council approves this application, or when the certificate of occupancy for the club house has been issued, whichever comes first. 75 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 6. The applicant is responsible for obtaining and complying with MnDot and Carver County permits and approval on any grading that takes place along the north and west side of the property- All roperty All disturbed areas are required to be restored with seed and mulch within two weeks of grading completion. 8. All plans must be signed by a professional civil engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Papke and Zorn voted in favor, Undestad, Keefe, McDonald and Larson voted in opposition. The motion failed with a vote of 2 to 4. Papke moved, Zorn seconded that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council denies Variance, Planning Case 05-39 for metal to be used as the exterior material of the maintenance and golf ball washing buildings, and denies the variance allolving the golf course to be open from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., based upon the findings in the staff report and the following: 1. The applicant has not demonstrated a hardship. 2. The property owner has reasonable use of the property. Papke and Zorn voted in favor, Undestad, Keefe, McDonald and Larson voted in opposition. The motion failed with a vote of 2 to 4. Larson: Wait. Did we say that wrong. McDonald: It doesn't make any difference. The motion fails. Larson: But I wanted a nay. McDonald: The motion fails 4 to 2. Papke: You were either voting for or against my motion. Larson: Right. Okay. I don't know. McDonald: The motion fails 4 to 2. Larson: Okay. I don't think that's what I meant. McDonald: The request for the additions are denied and what we're left with is the current conditional use permit and the applicant will I'm sure... Larson: I'm confused as to... 76 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 McDonald: Well it goes to City Council but what we are doing is forwarding it with a recommendation that the amendments be denied. Generous: That would be the second... Would you have to approve that though? Larson: Did I vote how I wanted to? McDonald: I beg your pardon? Generous: ... move denial of the proposed amendments? McDonald: We are denying the proposed amendments to the conditional use plan as presented to us here. Larson: No. That's not what happened. Generous: No, that would be another... McDonald: Well, even as amended by you... Generous: This was to approve with the changes to the conditions. McDonald: Right. Larson: Okay. Who am I denying? Who did I say yea to? McDonald: You said yea to Kurt's motion which he changed their amendment to allow for the four -foot height and the limitation of hours and the elimination of corrugated and no metal building would be allowed. Larson: Okay. That's what I meant. McDonald: What the Commission voted against and denied was that motion, which means what we're left with is the current conditional use permit so we have denied the applicant's request to expand his current conditional use permit. John Kosmas: That's not the way the recommendation of staff... Larson: See, that's what so confusing... McDonald: We denied staff's recommendation. We voted against it. John Kosmas: No, you modified it. McDonald: Then we voted against his. 77 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — February 7, 2006 John Kosmas: I heard a 4 to 2 positive. McDonald: No, you heard a 4 to 2 nay. Its 2 positive, 2 against, (correction) 4 against. John Kosmas: I misunderstood the direction that you took. So, the motion was to deny the recommendation of staff? McDonald: Yes. John Kosmas: Even though the motion was positive? McDonald: Even though he amended your motion, we still denied it. John Kosmas: Okay. Can I poll? I would like to know who are, I mean I want just to understand... McDonald: You can poll. I have no problem. Papke: Yea. Zorn; Nay. McDonald: Nay. Larson: Yea. Undestad: Nay. Keefe: Nay. John Kosmas: Okay. That's not what I heard when it was, it was too far back. So now what happens? McDonald: It goes to City Council. City Council can either approve or... Okay. That planning case is over. Next? Do I have a recognition of the minutes? APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Zorn noted the verbatim and summary minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated January 3, 2006 as presented. McDonald: Okay. A reminder, next week on February 13 at 6:00 p.m. we're to meet at the City Council. Acting Chairman McDonald adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 11:45 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director 78 Prepared by Nano Opheim/Kim Meuwissen Impression antibourrage et A skhage rapide www.avery.com/ l� _ 3C' AVERY® 5160® Utilisez le gabarit 51600 1 -800 -GO -AVERY V DONALD E HALLA & SANDRA J CWAYNA HALLA 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA MN 55318-9465 GAYE LYNN GUYTON 10083 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA MN 55318-9466 MAGDY A & JUNE L EBRAHIM 521 PINEVIEW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8697 THOMAS J & KATHLEEN R GERTZ 10001 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA MN 55318-9466 JAMES M HAUTMAN & DOROTHY D HAUTMAN 10095 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA MN 55318-9466 RICHARD S & KATHERINE S ASPLIN 541 PINEVIEW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8697 CARVER COUNTY R A & KIMBERLY A LEE GE CARVER COUNTY GOVT CTR -ADMIN ROGER ETH ST W 600 4TH ST E CHASKA MN 55318-2102 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8601 ANDREW T RIEGERT 620 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8601 JAMES D & JANET M DINGEL 9351 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8685 ROBERT W SCHOEWE 9611 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8689 BOYD S PETERSON 9860 PIONEER CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8696 VIVEK KAUL & SHERYL R EBERT 9875 DELPHINIUM LN CHASKA MN 55318-1176 GERALD F & NANCY G SLOCUM 9920 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8551 SHAWN S & NICOLA S SMITH 725 BRAMBLE DR CHASKA MN 55318 - ROBERT FUGLIE & KIMBERLY L HEIN-FUGLIE 9370 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8684 DAVID J & SHARON K GATTO 9631 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8689 JOHN & ANNA MAE MAKELA 9860 RASPBERRY HL CHASKA MN 55318-1180 KEN K HOLMBERG & NANCY J ROSSBERG 9885 RASPBERRY HL CHASKA MN 55318-1180 GERALD R JR & SHELLY D COOK 9920 DELPHINIUM LN CHASKA MN 55318-1177 DAVID P & JUDY M WALSTAD 10071 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA MN 55318-9466 DAVID R TEICH 1217 MONROE ST S SHAKOPEE MN 55379-2062 ROGER G NOVOTNY 560 PINEVIEW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8697 ROBERT & CHRISTIN E BOECKER 610 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8601 WENDELL & JACQUELINE SCHOTT 9350 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8684 THOMAS E & BRENDA L ANDERSON 9371 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8685 WILLIAM GRATZ 9851 PIONEER CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8696 MICHAEL ROBERT NELSON 9870 PIONEER CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8696 JEFFREY B & CAROL G SORUM 9900 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8551 WILLIAM J MCNEELY & MITRA BAHARI MCNEELY 9940 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8551 ®09L5 ®Jl?J3/�tj A113AV-09-WS-L 009LS 3XVIdIN31 �anv asn worAiane* MMn 6ulyulid awj a6pnwS pue wet Jam and Smudge Free Printing www.avery.com AVERYO 51600 Use Avery® TEMPLATE 51600 1 -800 -GO -AVERY STEPHEN M & NICOLE DRAGOS 9960 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8551 JEFFREY R & BARBARA C MICHELL 9961 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8552 ®091s ® �tl Alfl"-09-008-1 ®091s lljege6 al zaslim worAJanWMAW apldej a6ey�as a la a6eiinogllue uolssaidwl TRANSMITTAL DATE: 1 —6-06 TO: Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner @ City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd. Chanhassen MN 55317 PHONE: 227-1134 FAX: 227-1934 PROJECT: Halla Greens PROJECT NUMBER: 0510 — 06 RE: CUP/SPR for Halla Greens, LLC data and drawings ITEMS INCLUDED: Building plans, site plans, information sheets and data sheet. 1-6-06 Sharmeen, Attached are sixteen copies of the revised CUP / SPR drawings for the Halla Greens, LLC golf course. If you additional copies please contact our office. Also on the subject of the berm, they are identifying grades today and I anticipate that the grading will start on Tuesday the 10th and I will be in asking for a foundation permit on Wednesday. Please call with any questions or comments, Jot CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED JAN 0 6 2006 01*MA&%W p(A "W DEP' From the desk of ... JOHN KOSMAS ARCHITECT K K DESIGN 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 e-mail: john@kkdesign.biz phone: 952.922.3226 fax: 952.922.3231 INVOICE AMOUNT ��INVOICE AMOUNT 75593/910 •<.ws uw... rx< 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD. 12980 CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 612-445-6555 - M CD FIRST STATE BANK OF EDEN PRAIRIE 11800 SINGLETREE _ANE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 553CJ 11.0129806' 1:09100S330: 10 043GL11' .1192 f 6116990 :IS t hOt 0960:1 .IIS 1 1 t 00.11 M _C"b,jo � r -)1q $ �g� STTT 096 -140L -SL 83CS-99E99 NW'318IVCd N303 NOLLY13OSSV IVNOLLVN `NNVS 831111388 SZSZ-9Z6(Z96) Hd LLESS NW'N3SSVHNVHO IIVHl H33N0Id 966 'all `SN33UE) VIIVH OW3W 31 -LL Ol AVd 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 05-39 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, December 6, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Site Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Variances for the construction of a golf course on property located on the southeast corner of Great Plains Blvd. (Highway 101) and Pioneer Trail — HALLA GREENS. Applicant: Don Halla. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner Email: saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1134 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on November 25, 2005) Carver County GIS Mapping Application 14 101 i Mapc hyOnn QS OIro Legend Road Text US Hlghsars MN RigA ,s j:r CSAN Map Created on: Courny Reeds 1 10-31-2005 use.Carve r Panels Count y Aeml Phm 2007 This map was created using Carver County's Geographic Information Systems (GIS), it is a compilation of information and data from various City, County, State, and Federal offices. This map is not a surveyed or legally recorded map and is intended to be used as a reference. Carver County is not responsible for any inaccuracies contained herein. Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) Halla Greens (aka Chanhassen Short Course) Site Plan Amendment Planning Case No. 05-39 495 Pioneer Trail City of Chanhassen 14) �um. SUBJECT SITE HERFORT • NORBY Golf Course Architects November 11, 2005 Sharmeen Al jaff City of Chanhassen 690 City Center Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Chanhassen Short Course Sharmeen, This letter is to inform you that I have been paid in frill by Don Halla for the work which we did in conneef n with the Chanhassen Short Course. If you have any questions please feel free t7call me at (952)942-0266. Thank you. Sincerely, !i�► Kevin Norby, President Herfort Norby Golf Course Architects, LLC. 6452 City West Parkway, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 / (952) 942-0266 November 16, 2005 Don Halla 6601 Mohawk Trail Edina, MN 55439 1:rra:r:��w: WVa—�.�I Dear Mr. Halla: Due to the requested changes to your application which resulted in tabling the item from the November 15, 2005, the city will be unable to complete the review within 60 days of the original submittal (October 14, 2005). This letter is to formally notify you that the City is taking the additional 60 day extension to process this request as permitted under Minnesota Statute 15.99. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 227-1134. Sincerely, Sharmeen Al-Jaff Senior Planner MEMORANDUM TO: Sharrnin AI-Jaff, Senior Planner FROM: Steven Torell, Building Official DATE: November 2, 2005 SUBJ: Review of a request for a site plan amendment for a Golf Course located at the southeast comer of Pioneer Trail and Great Plains Boulevard, Halla Greens. Planning Case: 05-39 I have reviewed the plans for the above project. Following are my comments, which should be included as conditions of approval. 1. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 2. Five accessible parking spaces are required. 3. An accessible route must be provided to all facilities on the site. 4. Detailed occupancy related requirements cannot be reviewed until complete plans are submitted. 5. The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review, permit procedures and fire suppression options. G/safety/st/memos/plan/Halla Greens CITY OF CIIA NSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227 1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone. 952.227.1140 Fax 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Manning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.13110 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 web Site wwwoi.chanhassen.mn. us MEMORANDUM TO: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner FROM: Mak Sweidan, Engineer DATE: October 27, 2005 SUBJ: Revised Site Plan Review for a Golf Course Land Use Review File No. 03-15 Following the review of the Golf Course revised site plans dated October 14, 2005, prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc., the applicant is proposing to increase the size of the club house and the car parking lot, and regrade along the northwesterly and west sides of the parcel. Staff is Fine with the revised grading, the additional surface drainage generated from the hard surface and, the storm pond size is adequate. The applicant should be aware that any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. All disturbed areas are required to be restored with seed and mulch within two weeks of grading completion. As such, I recommend the additional following conditions: 1. The applicant is responsible for obtaining and complying with MnDOT and Carver County permits. 2. On the grading plan: a. Show the Pioneer Trail and Highway 101 center line and right-of-way with dimensions. b. Show the dimension distance from the parking lot to the Pioneer Trail right-of-way. c. Show the northwesterly storm pond outlet control structure and add a detail per City Plate No. 3109. d. Show all the existing utility locations, swales, contour lines and road alignment along the Highway 101 and Pioneer Trail intersection. 3. All plans must be signed by a professional civil engineer registered in the state of Minnesota. c: Paul Oehme, Public Works Director/City Engineer Allyson Morris, Assistant City Engineer Bill Bement, Engineering Technician. gAeng\projects\golf cours6site plan review 2.doc The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A geat place to live, work, and play. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Payee: HALLA NURSERY & HALLA GREENS Date: 11/01/2005 Time: 1:55pm Receipt Number: DW / 6745 Clerk: DANIELLE DVLP REVIEW APP 05-39 ITEM REFERENCE AMOUNT ------------------------------------------- DEVAP DVLP REVIEW APP 05-39 USE & VARIANCE 540.00 SIGN RENT 75.00 RECORDING FEES 50.00 SIGN ESCROW 100.00 --------------- Total: 765.00 Check 12980 Check 1115 Change: THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT! 150.00 615.00 0.00 SCANNED Date: October 21. 2005 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department By: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner Subject: HALLA GREENS — Request for a Site Plan Amendment for the expansion and redesign of a club house on property located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard (Highway 101) and Pioneer Trail. Planning Case: 05-39 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on October 14, 2005. The 60 -day review period ends December 13, 2005. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on November 15, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than November 4, 2005. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services S. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or Sprint/United) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco Carver County GIS Mapping Application r 101 Map Cated'bY Caney s (7S OfreP Legend Fwd reel US HgIv.ys aHi N N csµ q, Map Created on: 10-21-2005 yr a Carver Panels County Iunal 1n 1002 This map was created using Carver County's Geographic Information Systems (GIS), it is a compilation of information and data from various City, County, State, and Federal offices. This map is not a surveyed or legally recorded map and is intended to be used as a reference. Carver County is not responsible for any inaccuracies contained herein. TRANSMITTAL DATE: 10-14-05 TO: Sharmeen AIJaff, Senior Planner @ City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd Chanhassen MN 55317 PHONE: 227-1134 FAX: 227-1934 PROJECT: Halla Greens PROJECT NUMBER: 0510-06 RE: Site plan review application and drawings ITEMS INCLUDED: Building plans and site plans Cover plus 8 pages — Total 9 pages Sharmeen, Attached are the revised site and building plans for the enlarged clubhouse building, maintenance building and accessory building. I will provide you with sixteen full size folded copies on Monday morning. Please attach this information with the application delivered to you directly from Don Halla. Don will also have included the application fee of $150.00. CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED Please call with any questions or comments, John 14 OCTA 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT ��-f1uws(X fV6,Dft � L- gYzxu q?0v Okuueveo QA fato(U19 (ov2tfi-a.- U/l0w l u(p Aub 2 zoPlE5 af7 Coq .g42) From the desk of ... JOHN KOSMAS ARCHITECT K K DESIGN 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 e-mail: john@kkdesign.biz phone: 952.922.3226 fax: 952.922.3231 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on November 23, 2005, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Postponement of Public Hearing for Amendment to Site Plan, Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Karph J. En el ardt, Wputy Clerk Subscribed and swo to before me this,2 day of 12005. T 1 Notaryubli ": KIM T. MEUWISSEN � Notary Publ'�c-Minnesota Z � .,�• My Comm�saion Exq� Jan 31, 2010 CITY OF CHANHASSEN NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING POSTPONEMENT Dear Property Owner: On November 9, 2005, the City of Chanhassen mailed a public hearing POSTPONEMENT notice to you regarding the following proposal: Request for a Site Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Variances for the construction of a golf course — HALLA GREENS The public hearing has been POSTPONED a second time and WILL NOT be held at the December 6, 2005 Planning Commission meeting as scheduled. The item has been tentatively rescheduled for January 3, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. If you have questions regarding this proposal, contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff at 952-227-1134 or by email: sal]aff @ci.chanhassen.mn.us CITY OF CHANHASSEN NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING POSTPONEMENT Dear Property Owner: On November 9, 2005, the City of Chanhassen mailed a public hearing POSTPONEMENT notice to you regarding the following proposal: • Request for a Site Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Variances for the construction of a golf course — HALLA GREENS The public hearing has been POSTPONED a second time and WILL NOT be held at the December 6, 2005 Planning Commission meeting as scheduled. The item has been tentatively rescheduled for January 3, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. If you have questions regarding this proposal, contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff at 952-227-1134 or by email: sal iaff @ci.chanhassen.mn.us DONALD E HALLA & THOMAS J & KATHLEEN R GERTZ DAVID P & JUDY M WALSTAD SANDRA J CWAYNA HALLA 10001 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 10071 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA MN 55318-9465 CHASKA MN 55318-9466 CHASKA MN 55318-9466 GAYE LYNN GUYTON 10083 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA MN 55318-9466 MAGDY A & JUNE L EBRAHIM 521 PINEVIEW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8697 JAMES M HAUTMAN & DOROTHY D HAUTMAN 10095 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA MN 55318-9466 RICHARD S & KATHERINE S ASPLIN 541 PINEVIEW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8697 CARVER COUNTY ROGER A & KIMBERLY A LEE CARVER COUNTY GOVT CTR -ADMIN 600 96TH ST W 600 4TH ST E CHASKA MN 55318-2102 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8601 ANDREW T RIEGERT 620 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8601 JAMES D & JANET M DINGEL 9351 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8685 ROBERT W SCHOEWE 9611 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8689 BOYD S PETERSON 9860 PIONEER CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317.8696 VIVEK KAUL & SHERYL R EBERT 9875 DELPHINIUM LN CHASKA MN 55318-1176 SHAWN S & NICOLA S SMITH 725 BRAMBLE DR CHASKA MN 55318 - ROBERT FUGUE & KIMBERLY L HEIN-FUGLIE 9370 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8684 DAVID J & SHARON K GATTO 9631 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8689 JOHN & ANNA MAE MAKELA 9860 RASPBERRY HL CHASKA MN 55318-1180 KEN K HOLMBERG & NANCY J ROSSBERG 9885 RASPBERRY HL CHASKA MN 55318-1180 DAVID R TEICH 1217 MONROE ST S SHAKOPEE MN 55379-2062 ROGER G NOVOTNY 560 PINEVIEW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8697 ROBERT & CHRISTIN E BOECKER 610 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8601 WENDELL & JACQUELINE SCHOTT 9350 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8684 THOMAS E & BRENDA L ANDERSON 9371 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8685 WILLIAM GRATZ 9851 PIONEER CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8696 MICHAEL ROBERT NELSON 9870 PIONEER CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8696 JEFFREY B & CAROL G SORUM 9900 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8551 GERALD F & NANCY G SLOCUM GERALD R JR & SHELLY D COOK WILLIAM J MCNEELY & 9920 DEERBROOK DR 9920 DELPHINIUM LN MITRA BAHARI MCNEELY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8551 CHASKA MN 55318-1177 CHANHASSEN HASSE MN 55 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8551 STEPHEN M & NICOLE DRAGOS JEFFREY R & BARBARA C MICHELL 9960 DEERBROOK DR 9961 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8551 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8552 Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) Halla Greens (aka Chanhassen Short Course) Site Plan Amendment Planning Case No. 05-39 495 Pioneer Trail City of Chanhassen Q W, eem sveef �m d I� m i7 o PMaMew qtn Pioneer Trail (Hwy 14) 6� s q SUBJECT SITE j ,C ome I CITY OF CIMNSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 MEMORANDUM TO: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner FROM: Mak Sweidan, Engineer (f lFt Parc & Recreation DATE: December 21, 2005 Administration Carver County Permits and approval on any grading that takes place along the Phone: 952227.1100 north and west side of the property. Fax: 952.227110 SUBJ: Revised Site Plan Review for a Golf Course 2310 Coulter Boulevard Land Use Review File No. 03-15 Building Inspections 2. On the grading plan: Phone: 952.227.1180 d. Show all the existing utility locations, swales, contour lines and road Fax: 952.227.1190 alignment along the Highway 101 and Pioneer Trail intersection. Senior Center Following up on the Golf Course revised site plans staff memo dated October 27, Engineering 2005 and the site grading activity that took place by the applicant since that date, P:95221 Fax:952.227.1170 the applicant should be aware that any grading along Hi hwa s 101 and 14 must Web Site not change and/or affect the existing drainage pattern. All disturbed areas are Finance required to be restored with seed and mulch within two weeks of grading Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 completion. As such, staff recommends the following conditions: Parc & Recreation 1. The applicant is responsible for obtaining and complying with MnDOT and P5211 Fax:952.227.1110 Carver County Permits and approval on any grading that takes place along the Phone: 952.227.1130 north and west side of the property. Recreation center right-of-way. 2310 Coulter Boulevard c. Show the northwesterly storm pond outlet control structure and add a Phone: 952.227.1400 2. On the grading plan: Fax: 952.227.1404 d. Show all the existing utility locations, swales, contour lines and road Planning & a. Show the Pioneer Trail and Highway 101 center line and right-of-way Natural Resources with dimensions. Phone: 952.227.1130 b. Show the dimension distance from the parking lot to the Pioneer Trail Fax: 952.227.1110 right-of-way. Public works c. Show the northwesterly storm pond outlet control structure and add a 1591 Park Road detail per City Plate No. 3109. Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 9522271310 d. Show all the existing utility locations, swales, contour lines and road alignment along the Highway 101 and Pioneer Trail intersection. Senior Center Phone:5222711 Fax:52.221.1110 3. All plans must be signed by a professional civil engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Web Site www.achanhassen.mn.os c: Paul Oehme, Public Works Director/City Engineer Alyson Morris, Assistant City Engineer Bill Bement, Engineering Technician. g:\eng\projects\golf coum6updatesite plan review 3.doc The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding [rails, and beautiful parks. A geal place to live, work, and play. 10/20/2005 TUU 12:45 FAX 952 445 6557 HALLA NURSERY INC A TA Amtncen Nursery 6, 1-.6.P, A:woa October 20, 2005 U001/003 !HALL Since 1942 LANDSCAPE DESIGNERS, GROWERS, INSTALLERS INC POND GUILDERS, TREE MOVERS, CARDEN CENTER & GREENHOUSES 10,000 Groat Plains Blvd., Chunks, a/Innesop 55310-9985 LoeaW Bn Hwy. 101, 3 IAIIes SOUth of Hwy. 5 In Chanhaa moon Phone 9624459533 Faz 93240.5{597 To: City of Chanhassan: Sharmeen Al.laff Fax -952-227-1110 Bill Bement Fax -952-227-1170 Steve Torell Fax -952-227-1190 From: Don Halla Halla Nursery, Inc. We are planning on putting in curb on Monday October 24. Plans have previously been sent in. Run off calculations have also been previously sent in. Do we need a permit to put in the curb? Attached are copies of the site plan. "TIME PLACE TO GO FOR PLANTS THAT GROW" YOUR'STATE AND NATIONAL LANDSCAPE AWARD' WINNING NURSERY FOR DESIGNING & PLANTING J COO/ ZOO 8 A U u C+--� oxi AUHSHM MVH L999 266 Z26 %V3 S6-ZT lum SOOZ/OZiOT coo: cooZ EME gS� lL �$ all m�j s6 + / 6:8 �SSi L'R C+� DNI MSUN V'I'IVH LSS9 Stt Z26 %V3 St:ZT aU SOOZ/OZ/OT J � s W I� W IZ d �5 a Qlk 32 Ma W �s8 8m 6� mm W m�j s6 + / 6:8 �SSi L'R C+� DNI MSUN V'I'IVH LSS9 Stt Z26 %V3 St:ZT aU SOOZ/OZ/OT CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on November 9, 2005, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Postponement of Public Hearing for Amendment to Site Plan, Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and swum to before me thisr-t'„ day of k()V'rvvX6l , 2005. Notary Pub c Ka;Zn J. Enge dt, Depitity Clerk I#M=N ISSENinnesota Jan 31, a1f0 SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING POSTPONEMENT Dear Property Owner: On November 3, 2005, the City of Chanhassen mailed a public hearing notice to you regarding the following proposal: • Request for a Site Plan Amendment for the expansion and redesign of a club house — HALLA GREENS The public hearing has been POSTPONED and WILL NOT be held at the November 15, 2005 Planning Commission meeting as originally scheduled. The public hearing has also been amended to read "Request for a Site Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Variances for the construction of a golf course". The item has been tentatively rescheduled for December 6, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. If you have questions regarding this proposal, contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff at 952-227-1134 or by email: saljaffC@ci.chanhassen.mn.us CITY OF CHANHASSEN NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING POSTPONEMENT Dear Property Owner: On November 3, 2005, the City of Chanhassen mailed a public hearing notice to you regarding the following proposal: • Request for a Site Plan Amendment for the expansion and redesign of a club house — HALLA GREENS The public hearing has been POSTPONED and WILL NOT be held at the November 15, 2005 Planning Commission meeting as originally scheduled. The public hearing has also been amended to read "Request for a Site Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Variances for the construction of a golf course". The item has been tentatively rescheduled for December 6, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. If you have questions regarding this proposal, contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff at 952-227-1134 or by email: saliaff(cDci chanhassen mn us This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used ss one. This map is a compilation of records. Information and data located in "nous city. county, state and federal offices and cMer sources regarding Me area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The Gty does not warrant Mat the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are erre free, and Me City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requinng emoting measurement of distance or direction or precision 'rn the depiction of geographic fea ars;. If errors or discrepandes are found pease contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges Mat the City shall not be liable for any damages. and expressly waives all daims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Me City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or Mind parses which arse out of the users access or use of data provided. This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located In Various City, county, State and federal offices and other sources regarding Me area shown. and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant Mat Me Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map am error free, and the City does not represent Mat the GIS Data can be used for naNgabonal, Vacldng m any other purpose requiring emoting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is prodtletl pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges Mat the City shall not be liable for any damages, and a pressly waives all daims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or Mind parties which ansa out of the users access or use of data provided. ROGER A & KIMBERLY A LEE ROBERT & CHRISTIN E BOECKER ANDREW T RIEGERT 600 96TH ST W 610 96TH ST W 620 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8601 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8601 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8601 ROGER G NOVOTNY ROBERT W SCHOEWE THOMAS E & BRENDA L ANDERSON 560 PINEVIEW CT 9611 FOXFORD RD 9371 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8697 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-6689 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8685 ROBERT FUGUE & RICHARD S & KATHERINE S ASPLIN MAGDY A & JUNE L EBRAHIM KIMBERLY L HEIN-FUGLIE 541 PINEVIEW CT 521 PINEVIEW CT 9370 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8697 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8697 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8684 WENDELL & JACQUELINE SCHOTT DAVID J & SHARON K GATTO JAMES D & JANET M DINGEL 9350 FOXFORD RD 9631 FOXFORD RD 9351 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8684 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8689 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8685 DONALD E HALLA & CARVER COUNTY SANDRA J CWAYNA HALLA CARVER COUNTY GOVT CTR -ADMIN JOHN 8 ANNA 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 600 4TH ST E CHA RASPBERRRYY HL MAKELA CHASKA , MN 55318 -9465 CHASKA , MN 55318 -2102 HASKA , MN 553188 -1180 - WILLIAM GRATZ VIVEK KAUL & BOYD S PETERSON SHERYL R EBERT HA PIONEER , M 9875 DELPHINIUM LN CHANHASSEN, PIONEER CIR CHANHASSENMN 55317-6696 CHASKA, MN 55318-1176 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8696 MICHAEL ROBERT NELSON KEN K HOLMBERG & JEFFREY B & CAROL G SORUM 9870 PIONEER CIR NANCY J ROSSBERG 9900 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8696 9885 RASPBERRY HL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 A551 CHASKA . MN 55318 -1180 GERALD R JR & SHELLY D COOK SHAWN S & NICOLA S SMITH DONALD E HALLA ETAL 9920 DELPHINIUM LN 725 BRAMBLE DR 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA , MN 55318 -1177 CHASKA , MN 55318 - CHASKA , MN 55318 -9465 GERALD F & NANCY G SLOCUM JEFFREY R & BARBARA C MICHELL WILLIAM J MCNEELY & 9920 DEERBROOK DR 9961 DEERBROOK DR MITRA BAHARI MCNEELY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8551 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8552 9940 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8551 THOMAS J & KATHLEEN R GERTZ JAMES M HAUTMAN & STEPHEN M & NICOLE DRAGOS 10001 GREAT PLAINS BLVD DOROTHY D HAUTMAN 9960 DEERBROOK DR CHASKA , MN 55318 -9466 10095 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 4551 CHASKA . MN 55318 -9466 DAVID R TEICH DAVID P & JUDY M WALSTAD GAYE LYNN GUYTON 1217 MONROE ST S 10071 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 10083 GREAT PLAINS BLVD SHAKOPEE , MN 55379 -2062 CHASKA, MN 55318 -9466 CHASKA , MN 55318 -9466 1 1,c '3. 006 3:lCPM V K D SIGN No 6148 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 10-18-05 TO: Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner @ City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd P O Box 147 hanhassen MN 55317 PHONE: 952.227-1134 FAX: 952-227.1110 PROJECT: Halla Greens PROJECT NUMBER: 0510 - 06 RE: Application schedule and extension ITEMS INCLUDED: Cover and extension letter 2 Pages Total Sharmeen, Attached is a signed copy of the letter requesting that our application be rescheduled and the request to extend the 60 day approval to 120 days. Please Call with any questions or comments, John YF-J-theskofOSMAS HITECT K K DESIGN 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 e-mail: john@kkdesign.biz phone: 952.922.3226 fax: 952.922.3231 Nov.18- 2085 3:IOPM K K DESIGN No.6148 v, 2/2 November 8, 2005 (Updated November 18 2005) City of Chanhassen Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner 7700 Market Blvd. P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Halla Greens (Chanhassen Short Course) Pioneer Trail (CSAH 14) and Highway 101 (Great Plains Boulevard) Chanhassen, MN Sharmeen, Based on our conversation earlier today I am at this time requesting that the current application submitted to the City of Chanhassen for Halla Greens (Chanhassen Short Course) be tabled and rescheduled for the next available meeting in January, 2006. I also understand that this request changes the approval period from a 60 day requirement to 120 days Updated documents will be submitted during the first week of December, 2005 Thank you for your help with this project and will be talking to you soon concerning the various topics related to this project. Thank o , John Kosmas 952-922-3226 john cDkkdesign.biz cc: Don Halla @952-445-6557 (Fax) KKD - HALLA GREENS - CUP / SPR - TABLE 10.4.05 APPLICATION I K K DESIGN 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD. ST.LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 (952) 922 - 3226 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 05-39 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 7, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for a Site Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Variances for the construction of a golf course on property located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard (Highway 101) and Pioneer Trail — HALLA GREENS. Applicant: John Kosmas. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner Email: saliaMci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1134 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on January 26, 2006) January 6, 2006 Re: Halla Greens (Chanhassen Short Course) Pioneer Trail (Co. Rd. 14) and Highway 101 (Great Plains Boulevard) Chanhassen, MN Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner City of Chanhassen I have reviewed the previously approved Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review, Case Nos. 2003-7 SPR and 2003-4 CUP, for a Golf Course at the above noted address. Going through the eighteen (18) page document the following items have been determined to needing further review or revision: (Location of original information is noted in the parenthesis). 1. Size and quantity of buildings proposed for the function of the course. (Arch. Compliance data) a. Clubhouse was 40'x 60', with a 10' by 60' covered porch without screening and a patio on the south side of the building. The proposed structure will be a 40'x 66' main building with a 13'-4" x 40'-0" screened in veranda, on each end of the building, overall roofed area will be 92'- 8" x 40'-0". The outside patio will be approximately 1,000 square feet at the southwest comer of the building. b. Maintenance Building was 30'x 60' located east of the clubhouse building. The proposed structure will be a 68'x 120' building remaining on the east side of the clubhouse. The building will be a wood frame structure with vertical prefinished metal rib siding. The lower 48 inch portion of the wall area will be a green color with the balance above a cream color. The building will be positioned such that a 24 foot future addition can be constructed as the need develops. C. Ball washing building was not noted on the original plans. The proposed structure will be a 32'x 24' building, located south east of the Clubhouse and south of the Maintenance Building. It will be a wood frame structure of matching materials and colors to the Maintenance building. d. Teaching shelter was not noted on the original plans. The proposed structure will be 16'x 40' building, located west of the driving range. It will be a wood frame lean -too type structure of matching materials and colors to the Maintenance building. The building will allow an instructor and student(s) practice area protected from the elements. - HALLA GREENS - CUP / SPR UPDATE INFORMATION 1-6-06 1 K K DESIGN 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD. ST.LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 (952) 922 - 3226 2. Exterior finish of the buildings. (Arch. Compliance data) a. Clubhouse building was originally noted as cedar materials. The proposed building will include vinyl siding, pvc non -maintenance trim boards. The vinyl siding will be a simulated cedar texture design, earth tone color. The trim boards will be white along with the prefinished windows. The roofing material will be asphalt type shingles. b. Maintenance building will remain as a wood frame pole building type construction with metal exterior finish. The colors will again be from the earth tone color pallet, green and cream. C. The Ball washing building will be wood frame and finished similar to the Maintenance building both in materials and colors. d. The Teaching shelter building will be wood frame and finished similar to the Maintenance building and Ball washing building both in materials and colors. 3. Height and roof design of the clubhouse building. (Arch. Compliance data) a. Staff report represents the height to be 12 feet, one story. The building will remain one story, with a small equipment platform at the center of the building. The overall height of the main roof is 27 feet not including the copula. Including the copula it is 32 feet. b. The roof shape was original shown as a single gable roof with a shed roof at the covered porch. The proposed building will consist of a main hip roof over the main building and verandas. The two entry roofs are gables to the north and south. The main roof also includes two shed roof dormers for interior daylight and accent in the gathering area. Shingles will be heavy weight asphalt design. 4. Signs: (SPR 13) Original approval indicates a maximum size of 24 square feet with a 5 foot maximum height. The proposed sign is noted as a 4 foot high by 6 foot wide sign meeting the maximum sign area allowed of 24 square feet. The final copy included on the sign has not been determined at this date. The location is noted adjacent to the entrance drive located on Co. Rd. 14 (Pioneer Trail). The sign will be internally lit. 5. Lighting: (CUP 9) CUP and SPR indicated that the lighting would be limited to residential type lights attached to the building. It also discusses the concept of having the operational hours as sunrise to sunset thus eliminating the need for parking lot and golf course lighting. CUP condition No. 9 states "No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety light". Upon evaluating the operational aspects of the course two issues are raised: 1. for "safety" the parking lot should have lighting for both the customers and employees who arrive before sunrise and leave after - HALLA GREENS - CUP / SPR UPDATE INFORMATION 1 K K DESIGN 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD. ST.LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 (952) 922 - 3226 sunset. Typically a minimum lighting level that is recommended by the law enforcement groups would be an averagel foot candle at all public walkways etc. It is also recommended for security of the buildings and equipment a minimal light level should be maintained through out the evening hours to reduce vandalism etc. 2. The course currently includes a driving range and in the future a family miniature golf course, both of which require the use of lighting during the evening hours of operation. Therefore, the current restrictions need to be modified to provide for proper safety and operation of the business, thus allowing lighting for the driving range and future miniature golf area. At this time the proposed lighting plan for the parking lot and entrance drive is below the city guidelines of .5 foot candles at the property line with readings ranging from "0" foot candles to .2 foot candles. The maximum proposed is less than 50 percent of the city guidelines. Lighting for the driving range is currently being evaluated and the information should be available shortly. 6. Facade transparency: (Architectural Compliance data) The evaluation comment that states, "All facades viewed by the public must contain more than 50 percent windows". The proposed front (north) elevation contains 25 percent glass windows and doors using the wall area only. If the screened in portion of the verandas are included in the area the percentage changes to 49 percent. Therefore some adjustment needs to be made allowing the slightly lesser percentage. 7. The parking setback from Co. Rd. 14 (Pioneer Trail) to be 50 feet. The proposed curb line is located at 50.2 feet and will be maintained. The original berming and landscaping will be modified to maintain desired drainage required along side Co. Rd. 14. The parking is depressed about 4 feet from the road surface thus eliminating the need to screen headlight glare towards the roadway. For visual enhancement plantings compatible with the soil, snow, salt and drainage conditions will be installed, including wild flowers and water tolerant trees. 8. There is no mention of the Clubhouse being open year around. Since they have the facilities for coffee and sandwiches it makes sense that they have the option to be open all year rather than just the summer period. I request that the language included with the CUP includes the statement that the facility will be open for 12 months, not just seasonal. I also recommend that the reference that they will be open from sunrise to sunset be deleted. The statement should read, "The facility will maintain normal business hours", example 6:00 AM to 11:00 PM. 9. Original application did not include the request for a temporary building facility for daily operations during the period when the main buildings are under construction. Due to the current schedule of construction I request that a facility be allowed to serve as a temporary customer and employee building. The facility would allow customers to pay KKD - HALLA GREENS - CUP / SPR UPDATE INFORMATION 1-6-06 3 K K DESIGN 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD. ST.LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 (952) 922 - 3226 greens fees schedule tee times etc. The structure would be a 12 foot octagon shaped structure constructed of wood framing. It will be a moveable structure without any footings. It will include temporary electric and phone services. Temporary sanitary facilities will be provided for both men and women. Please reference attached data sheet for general information about site and parking data. Thank you, John Kosmas 952-922-3226 john kkdesign.biz cc: Don Halla @952445-6557 (Fax) KKD - HALLA GREENS - CUP / SPR UPDATE INFORMATION 1-6-06 4 K K DESIGN 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD. ST.LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 (952) 922 - 3226 HALLA GREENS, LLC. PROPERTY LOCATION: DATA SHEET January 5, 2006 495 PIONEER TRAIL ST. HIGHWAY 101 AND CO. RD. 14 CHANHASSEN, MN LOT AREA: 45.2 ACRES (1,968,912 sf) HARDSURFACE COVERAGE 77,169 SF OR 4 PERCENT OF TOTAL LOT AREA (Bldgs. Parking, Driveways and Paths) PROPOSED BUILDING AREA: CLUBHOUSE BUILDING: VERANDAS AND VESTIBULES: MAINTENANCE BUILDING: BALL BUILDING: TEACHING SHELTER: TOTAL PARKING REQUIREMENTS: NUMBER OF STALLS: (Clubhouse — 2,640 sf.) SETBACK: SIGN REQUIREMENTS: SIGN AREA: SIGN SETBACK: 2,640 S.F. 1,501 S.F. 8,160 S.F. 768 S.F. 640 S.F. 13,709 S.F. CITY GUIDELINE PROPOSED 20 STALLS PLUS 1 100 std. sails PER 500 SF. FLOOR 4 H/C stalls AREA = 26 stalls 104 total stalls 50 FEET FROM R.O.W. 50.2 FEET 24 SQ. FT. 24 SQ. FT. 10 FEET FROM R.O.W. 10 FEET KKD - HALLA GREENS - CUP / SPR UPDATE INFORMATION 1-6-06 5 K K DESIGN 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD. ST.LOLIIS PARK, MN 55416 (952) 922 - 3226 CITY OF MEMORANDUM CHANIMSEN TO: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner 7790 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 FROM: Mak Sweidan, Engineer Chanhassen, MN 55317 State of Minnesota. Fax: 952 227,1404 DATE: January 24, 2006 Administration c: Paul Oehme, Public Works Director/City Engineer Phone: 9522271100 Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Fax: 952227.1110 SUBJ: Site Plan Amendment Review for a Golf Course Fax: 952,227 1110 Use Review File No. 03-15 Building InspectionsLand g \eng\projects\golf course\site plan amend. review 4.doc Phone: 9522271180 Fax: 952.227.11 go Fax: 952,22 7.1310 Upon review of the Site Plan Amendment dated January 6, 2006, prepared by K. K. Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Design, I recommend the following conditions of approval: Fax: 952.227,1170 Fax: 952.227,1110 1. The applicant is responsible for obtaining and complying with MnDOT and Finance Carver County permits and approval on any grading that takes place along the P 52227.1110 1140 Fax: Fax: 952.227.1 north and west side of the property. Park 6 Recreation 2. All disturbed areas are required to be restored with seed and mulch within two Phase: 952.2271120 Fax: 952.227.1110 weeks of grading completion. Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard 3. All plans must be signed by a professional civil engineer registered in the Phone: 952.2271400 State of Minnesota. Fax: 952 227,1404 Planning g c: Paul Oehme, Public Works Director/City Engineer Natural Resources Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Phone: 952 2271130 Fax: 952,227 1110 Public Wpr g \eng\projects\golf course\site plan amend. review 4.doc 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952,22 7.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227,1110 Web site www ci.chanhassen.mn.us The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. 311 - � zoa� —'° S7EfG RooF b - �nu inu -ami can EAST / WEST ELEV. BA Dd SMAG.L PAS),/ SMELT EA H'i 2.0 ' BALL 6R5kEt VuAT£R pop MAc_d5Nt WATT pop srEP'R A)OoF gnu _ rxw arae REAR ELEV. lea SOUTH ELEV. s(dk I , BALI FLOOR R PLANeN Pic kf ��II STEEG iiDOF do 1//A/A I-- 5 iDIA1c SID�Et ELEV. FRONT�ELEV. •r6 — c,LO R ego ecru - arAn a«n inu _ami can EAST ELEV. r•- a-- NORT�HsELEV. � F vy �b r LE.I v 2 W <2 /cl ES cv) � I 3 CREEN MOWERS 3 FAIRWA OW O �,%�• �"I /� R��. PFP tIGS ERS TRACTO (Bx1o' ���y) O' N o � a� RS MOli�6 I J a VV FERTIUZ R SPREAD R S�►1 N�' FLOOR PLAN c,LO R ego ecru - arAn a«n inu _ami can EAST ELEV. r•- a-- NORT�HsELEV. � F vy �b r LE.I v 2 W <2 /cl ES cv) � I 3 CREEN MOWERS 3 FAIRWA OW O PANTS P,A.m.< SEFVIC AREA W/ BENCH 40'x1 P�N� NE EUEIJ ADAM SLAUS GAS l� . V tt IiKL J ? Bvs it �,%�• �"I /� R��. PFP tIGS ERS TRACTO (Bx1o' ���y) O' N o � a� RS MOli�6 I J a VV FERTIUZ R SPREAD R g P g Hoax ww .w g $ a Q a QUID FERTI ZER SPR ERS YN�,ERVI�ING _ m .. _ .. �T� FEAT/i+LCR a� SRUJEM d LL o ® e / RAG ALL DRAWINGS ON THIS SHEET ARE CONCEPTIONAL 5AA10 501 L- 0401)(L i7X8� 3 Qjj cuSflmC -,r ACT Top iERT SE YFAA G 6 valtxf PRODUCT ORAGE 3 AR 12'x12' TI I ER (j / M^� 1 TRUCK ER W/ DU P Tj;NLER ER S(I1� i -1Tplig -Uh -NT= I7Asa�l MOWS S g 2 GOLF GAAT5 NJGH-r-- = PANTS P,A.m.< SEFVIC AREA W/ BENCH 40'x1 P�N� NE EUEIJ ADAM SLAUS GAS l� . V tt IiKL J ? Bvs it O' N o S RS I R FERTIUZ R SPREAD R $ QUID FERTI ZER SPR ERS _ m .. .. a� FLOOR PLAN d LL o ® ALL DRAWINGS ON THIS SHEET ARE CONCEPTIONAL G EAST ,_/.,WEST ELEV. SSO�� Foo U,jTH ELEV. in l ,JWP � FORt PLAN ILO�— EAST ELEV. \ nlnoTU n ry FRONT ELEV. I T=o•• — PRODUCT ORALE 3 AR 12'x12'y�f IERTIIIZER AREA 24'.!2' FLOOR PLAN I� rr _ OOR PLANeN ALL DRAWINGS ON THIS SHEET ARE CONCEPTIONAL M Z ¢ c LJ 4 Ld a 'ry V � w I z 0 Q a U 4 J :u J = Q i 2 104 ------------- -------- --- ---, I I I I I 1 1 I i �i '113 I I I I I I 1 n n oc�21 I I I, I 1 1 1 I I [S I I I I I 1 1 I a t� { i 1 I I , I F _ , 1 I I 1 � - I I I I I ❑ I i I 0 I 1 E 00 O I i u I I I s I I I I _ I fo , 'e I I C , I I I I 1 1 1 , I � 1 1 I I I ,A , I I I I I , I I , HALLA GREENS AWK. K. DESIGN yl C05 RON— ` p1,iECiVIIAC AM Vl _ i i6E9A 9YkW0 -. YNl Ivn«mm MI CHANHASSEN MINNESOTA w-m-lae vw�'9A �a1]Yr6 W6�3>a3 wNOis3aR'He�� V10S3NNIW — N3SS HNV 3 lMLL N➢NON S6, SN3360 V—nVH�o,m"� mov�im� � . �y� I VF a 9 a °L z o, J= =L_ -L ml 4._D.. 14._0.. 20 _0' �a n 12' -0" -OVERHEAD 4'-0,ONCRETE APRON — 14.-0.. I 32.-0- 68 -0 0.66'-0 r�ItI PRO -NO. 1 -11\1 GRITNS 4'-0" CONCRETE APRON DESIGNED RY �Pn 20 _0' �a n 12' -0" -OVERHEAD 4'-0,ONCRETE APRON — 14.-0.. I 32.-0- 68 -0 0.66'-0 r�ItI PRO -NO. 1 -11\1 GRITNS DESIGNED RY �Pn -I -A PRAWN I" SPL MAINTENANCE BUILDING LANNING [Qf6112 PLS..MINN.DATE to la2Dp5 495 PIONEER TRAIL CHANNHASSEN — MINNESOTA 55416 s zz z m O rri r(1 rC.ffi-, VW. -till ` Illi I I h � I Ii I' I I I F i i I > a Epi / I r < I 20._0.. i%�� '7r K. K. DI -1 NAI_LA GREENS , � � D PESIGNE� BY JPK �/��� naewH er sFE MAINTENANCE BUILDING ARCHITECTURE - PEGHq„+o oni[ tEXCELSIOR 0Ia/2005 49S PIONEER TRAIL CHANNHASSEN — MINNESOTA �Xu' %.T19522922 3226 BLVD eIr'En.MIHa 55Ji6 n z z z m O I'. _ II �� 1 (T1 I I_IJI! J MI 10 -0- D""-0" "-0" OVERHEAD DR. - yFm AD m r C r or i i' n zf a �- s�s I mo 3 c I 14'-0" OVERHEAD DR. L — \ II r• u: PROJ.ND_ DESIGNED BY JPK HALLA GREENS j K. K. DESIGN DRAWN BY SPL BALL WASHING BUILDING ARCHITECTURE - PLANNING DATE : 10, N; 2DD5 495 PIONEER TRAIL CHANNHASSEN - MINNESOTA 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD. MPLS.•MINN. 952-922-3226 55416 ❑ Z «N� ueald 6w5 s..:,y:: mP.,bM�n4peig u a quR�aammmeti6. . ese4xAu�se�1Mo4anrane.brVra/mBaefew. a^�m0 ra•Ww0 no pyp ✓ ��+` � — _— —� "/ >/��`' iii at I t + /41 � � I a � a PIONEER TRAIL ❑ U) I O a AllI i U Pond - !I 1� v �- m ,o CI'4o .+�I OS• o 0 3b rnw wulw� uiOO� 00 Clubhouse -+,»5 Practice Storage - Green IMaint. Bldg. »kms a 6, 6, _—•-=__ .�.I. any s SCANNFD r CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 FAX (952) 227-1110 TO: Campbell Knutson, PA 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter 0 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL JOB 4/26/06 Nelson Document ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Change Order ❑ Pay Request ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 3/20/06 05-39 Restated and Amendment Site Plan Agreement 2003-07 for Halla Greens ❑ FORBIDS DUE For Recording ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return ® For Recording ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO: Don Halla Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner SIGNED: copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints {CANNED If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. E 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT HALLA GREENS- PLANNING CASE NO. 05-39 SITE PLAN REVIEW 2003-07 SPR SPECIAL PROVISIONS RESTATED AND AMENDED SITE PLAN AGREEMENT AGREEMENT dated March 20, 2006, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City"), and DONALD E HALLA & SANDRA J CWAYNA HALLA, (the "Developer"). 1. Request for Site Plan Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan for the construction of a Club House, a Maintenance Building, a golf ball dispensing building and a lean-to for a golf course (referred to in this Permit as the "project"). The land is legally described as: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, Block 2; and Lots 1 and 2, Block 3; Lots 1 and 2 Block 4; Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 5; Outlot A; Together with vacated Columbine Trail, vacated Hibiscus Trail; vacated Periwinkle Trail; and vacated Halla Nursery Drive West; all in the recorded plat of Halla Great Plains Addition, Carver County, Minnesota. 2. Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enters into this Permit and furnishes the security required by it. ,, a L 3. Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Permit, the written terms shall control. The plans are: • Plan A (1) -Site Plan dated July 18, 2003, revised August 25, 2003, prepared by Herfort Boby Golf Course Architects and Sathre-Berquist, Inc., and Key Plan dated January 6, 2006, prepared by K. K. Design. • Plan B (2) -Grading Plan dated July 18, 2003, revised August 25, 2003, prepared by Herfort Boby Golf Course Architects and Sathre-Berquist, Inc. • Plan C (3) -Buffer Yard Planting Plan dated July 18, 2003, revised August 25, 2003, prepared by Herfort Boby Golf Course Architects and Sathre-Berquist, Inc. • Plan D (4)- Club House Site Plan, partial site plan dated January 6, 2006, prepared by K. K. Design. • Plan E (5)- Construction Details dated July 18, 2003, prepared by Herfort Boby Golf Course Architects and Sathre-Berquist, Inc. • Plan F- Site Map/Property Description dated July 18, 2003, prepared by Sathre- Berquist, Inc. • Plan G- Elevations dated August 13, 2003, prepared by Lester. • Plan H- Club House Main Level plan dated January 6, 2006, prepared by K. K. Design. • Plan I- Roof Plan, Reflected Ceiling Plan and Equipment Platform plan dated January 6, 2006, prepared by K. K. Design. • Plan J- Club House detail plan dated January 6, 2006, prepared by K. K. Design. • Plan K- Ball Washing Building, Teaching Shelter, and Maintenance ElevationClub House detail plan dated January 6, 2006 and revised and received on March 14, 2006, prepared by K. K. Design. • Plan L- Existing Plantings along property lines dated January 6, 2006, prepared by K. K. Design. 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by August 15, 2006. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Permit, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or equivalent ("security") for $6,3110 (Landscaping, Grading and Erosion Control). This amount has been calculated at a rate of 110% of the actual value of the improvement. 0 6. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: Don Halla Contact Person: Sandy Halla 6601 Mohawk Trail Edina, MN 55439 (952)941-8422 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Telephone (952) 227-1100. 7. Other Special Conditions. On September 15, 2003, the City Council adopted the following motion: SITE PLAN REVIEW "The City Council approves Site Plan Review 2003-7 for the construction of a Club House and a Maintenance Building for a golf course as shown in plans dated August 25, 2003, and amended Site Plan Review 2003-7 SPR — Planning Case 05-39, for the construction of a Club House, a Maintenance Building, a golf ball washing building and a lean-to for a golf course as shown in plans dated received January 6, 2006, with the following conditions: A. Approval of the Site Plan Review application is contingent upon approval of Conditional Use Permit 2003-4. B. All trees to be preserved must be protected by tree protection fencing. Fencing must be installed prior to grading. C. No vegetation may be removed within the bluff impact zone. D. The applicant shall provide a pedestriantbikeway connection to the City's trail system at the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Pioneer Trail. E. Fire Department Conditions: 1. Contact the Building Official and Fire Marshal to discuss the sprinkling requirements for the clubhouse and storagelmaintenance building. 2. If a Fire Hydrant is available, a 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Qwest, Excel Energy, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. • 0 3. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs and yellow curbing will be required. Please contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of signs and curbs to be painted yellow. 4. The builder must comply with Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division regarding maximum allowable size of domestic water on a combination water/sprinkler supply line. This is only if a sprinkler is required. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division Policy #36-1994. 5. The builder must comply with the Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division regarding premise identification. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention division Policy #29-1992. 6. A post indicator valve will be required on any building that will have a sprinkler system. 7. Submit radius turns and dimensions to City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. F. Building Official Conditions: 1. Submit a detailed floor plan of the clubhouse so the occupancy classification and fire suppression requirements can be determined. 2. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. An accessible route must be provided to all facilities on the site. 4. Submit a design of the on-site sewage treatment system for review and approval. Two sites must be provided and these sites must be protected from damage prior to beginning any construction activity on the site. The system must comply with the requirements of Minnesota Rules 7080.0600. 5. Detailed occupancy related requirements cannot be reviewed until complete plans are submitted. 6. The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review, permit procedures and fire suppression options. G. Engineering Department Conditions: 1. Staff recommends that Type I silt fence be used along the northwesterly and southerly property lines. The applicant should be aware that any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. All disturbed areas are required to be restored with seed and mulch within two weeks of grading completion. 2. Add the following City of Chanhassen Latest Detail Plates Numbers: 5201, 5203, 5207, 5300, and 3001 3. The applicant is responsible to obtain and comply with all regulators agency permits. 4. On the grading plan add a bench mark. H. The applicant must submit detailed architectural plans for the club house and maintenance building that meet the design ordinance requirement. 0 I. The applicant shall enter into a Site Plan Agreement and provide financial guarantees to insure compliance with the project. Only one (1) monument sign may be permitted on the site. The total sign area shall not exceed twenty-four (24) square feet of sign display area, nor be more than five (5) feet in height. K. The applicant is responsible to obtain and comply with MnDOT and Carver County permits for the new access. L. Per MnDOT's review memo dated September 2, 2003, the need for a net along TH 101 will be evaluated upon completion of the golf course. If it is determined that a net is needed, then the applicant will be required to install it. M. The applicant shall comply with all DNR Water Appropriation Purmit requirements. (The DNR examines a copy of the well log and the test pumping results before they make decisions on DNR appropriation permits.) N. Comply with all conditions of the Carver County review letter dated 8/29/03. O. Comply with all conditions of the Mn/DOT review letter dated 8/26/03. P. Applicant shall increase landscape plantings to meet minimum requirements for parking lot trees. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the City and approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. Q. Applicant shall fully screen parking lots from adjacent roadways through the use of berming or increased landscaping. R. The applicant must submit detailed architectural plans for the maintenance building, golf ball washing building, and lean-to that meet the design ordinance requirement. S. Comply with all conditions of the MnDOT review letter dated November 23, 2005. T. 'The temporary 120 square -foot octagon building may remain on the site for a time period not to exceed six month after City Council approval and must be removed within two weeks after a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. The building shall be located in the parking lot. U. The applicant is responsible for obtaining and complying with MnDOT and Carver County permits and approval on any grading that takes place along the north and west side of the property. V. All disturbed areas are required to be restored with seed and mulch within two weeks of grading completion. W. All plans must be signed by a professional civil engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. 5 6 0 X. The golf ball washing and golf ball dispensing building shall not exceed 100 square feet in area. Y. The maintenance building may not be used for "Halla Nursery" related items nor exceed 2,040 square feet in area. The outdoor storage area shall be fully screened by a board on board wooden fence. The height of the fence shall not exceed 6ih feet. Z. The trash enclosure located west of the maintenance building shall be constructed of materials similar to the club house building. AA. No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety lights which include parking lot lights, soffit lights and drive aisle lights. The height of the light poles in the parking lot and along the entrance driveway (total of five fixtures) may not exceed 15 feet. The remaining light fixtures may not exceed 4 feet in height. All light fixtures must meet ordinance requirements. All lights with the exception of the light located in the center island of the parking lot and the club house soffit lights, shall be shut off one hour after sunset." 8. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Permit are attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein. (SEAL) STATE OF NE NNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: ! -W-4- Elln--4 Tom Furlong, MaSr AND: /�"'1 odd Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2 Zlay of �, 2006, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. KAREN J. ENGELHARDT "NOT*Y Notary Public -Minnesota My Commission Explree Jen 31, 2010 0 0 DEVELOPER: BY: Donald E. Halla BY: Sandra I Cwayna 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF tAA4 Cc� I/ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of, 2006 by Donald E. Halla. NOTARY PUBLIC -MINNESOTA NOTARY PUBLIC - - My Commission Ezgres Jan. 31, 2010 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (Ss COUNTY OF//eA/,kJe,,OJ / The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /?day day of ec�. 2006 by Sandra J. Cwayna Halla. ANN M. WALDSCHMIDT NOTARY PUBLIC - _ NOTARY PUBLIC -MINNESOTA My Commission Expres Jan. 31, 2010 vj 0 0 CONSENT Owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Permit, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this —!A day of 47,1, 2006 By STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ``// (ss COUN'T'Y OF /y f t/A/'tP Tq The (foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this —,�Z day of 2006, by ,421J G NOTARY PUB11C City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 lIlIIJIJJIJ! lIIIJJjII!!!!ll..S ✓IIIJJJIJJIJlllllf lJll!!IIl� w 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT EXHIBIT "B" GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk; 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City; 3) the site plan has been recorded with the County Recorder s Office of the County where the project is located; and 4) the City Planner has issued a letter that the foregoing conditions have been satisfied and then the Developer may proceed. 2. Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and groundcover required as a condition of site plan approval that die shall be promptly replaced. 3. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building permits are issued, the erosion control plan (Plan B) shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary groundcover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties W, recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan, schedule, or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developers and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authorize removal of the erosion control measures. 5. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan (Plan C) shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease-free at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer or his contractor(s) shall post maintenance bonds (Miller Davis Company Form No. 1636 or equal) or other security acceptable to the City to secure the warranties at the time of final acceptance. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by it and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses, which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attomeys' fees. 10 B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attomeys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and construction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. 8. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on-site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Permit. 11 0 • D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Permit by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Permit is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Occupancy. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Recording. This Permit shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. I. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. 12 0 0 J. Construction Hours. The normal construction hours under this contract shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the site plan, the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District; 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. M. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers to enter into this Development Contract. 13 N. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning neither the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. gAplan\2005 planning cases\05-39 halla greens 03-07 site plan amendmenAsite plan ageementdoc 14 rhomas J. Campbell Roger N. Knutson rhomas M. Scott Elliott B. Knetsch foci J. Jamnik 4ndrea McDowell Pochler Matthew K. Brokl' fohn F. Kelly Soren M. Mattick Henry A. Schaeffer, III klina Schwartz Craig R. McDowell Marguerite M. McCarron mina M. Brandt s Also Licensed in Wisconsin 1360 Corporate Center Curve Suite 317 • Fagan, MN 55121 i51-452-5000 Fax 651-452-5550 rww.ck-law.com CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Direct Dial: (651) 234-6222 E-mailAddress. snelson(i�ck-law.com August 3, 2006 RE��_9VED Ms. Kim Meuwissen AUG 0 7 2006 Chanhassen City Hall ;ITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 RE: CHANHASSEN - RECORDED Doct1MENTs ➢ Halla Greens —Planning Case No. 05-39 - CUP #03-04 — Restated and Amended Conditional Use Permit - Site Plan Permit — Restated and Amended Site Plan Agreement Dear Kim: Enclosed please find the following documents which have been recorded with Carver County in connection with the Halla Greens planning case: 1) Conditional Use Permit #03-04/Restated and Amended Conditional Use Permit dated March 20, 2006, which was recorded on May 12, 2006 as Abstract Document No. A441074. 2) Site Plan Permit/Restated and Amended Site Plan Agreement dated March 20, 2006, which was recorded on June 9, 2006 as Abstract Document No. A442980. Regards, CAMPBELL KNUTSON Pro e Tonal Association Y: $ san R. Nelson, Legal A istant SRN:ms / Enclosures Engineering Phone: Phane:952227.1180 July 20, 2006 Fax: 952.227.1170 Donald Halla Phone: 952.227.1300 10000 Great Plains Boulevard Finance Phone: 9522271140 Chaska, MN 55318 CITYOF is a wetland or a stormwater pond, I would encourage you to contact the Senior Center Re: fountain/windmill questions CHONSEN 7700 Market Boulevard Dear Mr. Halla, PO Box 147 Again, I am not authorizing you to proceed with the installation of a Chanhassen, MN 55317 This letter is a follow up to our phone conversation on July 20, 2006 Administration requesting additional information on the installation of a fountain within Phone: 952.227 1100 your pond area. You had indicated on the phone that you desire to install a Fax: 952.2271110 windmill near the pond to power the fountain pump. In this letter I will Planning & only reiterate our conversation on the fountain. The windmill is an issue Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 which will need to be handled by the planning department. Please contact Fax: 952.227.1190 Sharmeen Al-Jaff at 952-227-1134 to further discuss the issue. Engineering Phone: Phane:952227.1180 Generali fountains may be installed in stormwater ponds within Y> Y Fax: 952.227.1170 Chanhassen. These basins are utilized basins used for treating stormwater Phone: 952.227.1300 prior to entering priority water bodies. Fountains are not allowed in Finance Phone: 9522271140 Chanhassen wetlands. If you are unsure about whether the body of water Y Y Fax: 952.227.1110 is a wetland or a stormwater pond, I would encourage you to contact the Senior Center City of Chanhassen to verify the basin designation. Park d Recreation Phone: 952227.1120 Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner Fax: 952.227.1110 Again, I am not authorizing you to proceed with the installation of a Recreation Center windmill. You will need to contact Sharmeen Al-Jaff to discuss your 2310 Coulter Boulevard options. Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & CITY OF CHANHASSEN Natural Resources Phone: Fax: 952.227.11100 C/ Public works Donald Asleson, Natural Resource Technician 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 cc: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Senior Center Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner Lori Haak, Water Resources Coordinator Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a craning downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. v o cc a U a` m W � OR aa-a�� s Cl)gA .. f xx 11.• .iciei'i3tl I. . _ �'11WIM ]1N{'Y 1tl/ V)I{ WIM .• Y .YII NISIrV4 - x1 1: uNl N4'NMI 1p1{ yYb{ .V { .K� IKiK{V4 - N i:YWNIe WNltl4 Datl .a nl s an. D>µ! tl 3V IM„nN4 4Npf ��/ •1 ry m y ry •1 ry H ' ry R R •\~vi`MtlNi�Ipw'. � R H R H' R �anuM' '. 1 •1 n al Il R. n n R A 11 R R�• t't R N+1•x.% x,uDw,. l R R' R n n '•1 ry' R n n' H 7 ry n NY•ww xxlew .. Yr• wxxY. eNalflB 'Mtlx 39na19 R t[ [1 I'1 I'S Yl r1 ry kL Y( IL' crx• tle...w' I\. n'R.' n n ry vl..+. m y •1 h R R ry.n R •nnmwn rr<xNN lel l n R •\ '.R n'.R H 1 �1�•\�n�H�R �I �\`1 _n nr R'r R R n h W'ry rt,ry / oxalos ernoxemD �•j R,H 11. w....v �H. R; .!1 R, R R ri h IrG�R`•M1�- � 1 �l'I r+'4yR�t �l R R -•� n R n n' x •u r' R. R •C R n R !T D� rRi rl n n r` BHpy{,�,\'1 -i\1'I +f-/ 'r ly; !l� i! R R n •K H H R R H n n -.x .er .. t.. .'R ry R R R R !T 1 elV R •1 n 1 H rt. ry �ry •f •L�� %ri;n rj H ry {1 11 1 1 Oi 1 1 R ry H rt R R R rt rl S r1 R R. !1 n ry R H'R R R R •t' rl R H R n n 3F I ry H R,ry,K h n •\ R It n n l n� n R n �D' r{ • 1' rl •'� n R R R x .xN} rN1 ry rt n H '1 R !1 •1I •l R n R R n: R R n r{ H n R R •1' It rl' rl R 4 n R n It It R R RR n LONe J R R R 9 n R R R^ I R- R K. 9 It R n el rl rt n R •t R R R rt n n R R R - n R xt n n R. R n . rt ry n ry R R R R H I K 'rt R •t n It H rt n It •t •L 11 K IT It n I1 "i K It n •t R R '\ 11 R R n nrr.r W_tjiZtid' R R 9 R n R'R ry R 7 R 1't K • t r{ •T n f' !' •S n R R 1' R •4 R II R R R n r_Ilr r r K r R'R n n W+O"Zkid .. .. n. R R R R R R M 1' R rt il it I . .n n C T n. •i R •t '' R rt n R R R n.. n R R n R R R h R. !1 n n R K n R S n •i R. t R aT H R R R n H R R R' n It '1 R R R It n. I\ •\ n 11 H •S ry R R ri n g n ry R n H R R •i R rl rt al n. '•i R n H R ❑ n. R rt R R n n R •l rt rl R 9 R R K R n •Y n R +\ 'n 1d�a PVINNY1d N388YHNtMj A ry R R ry n n •I R R n R'..•t I'1 rl. •1 -n .R R rt R ri H.H n ri n n ry ry H rl n It rl R rt ry n ry n R 9001 90NDI' n ir. n n' R R n n n. •i 1 ri n.^ r Litt n ry 1 n n n n n n R H n R n .! R' .n 'R ry ry R al n R R R R N�s8MH3NYH�J iO AdI� - ry-R ry H R •1 n r r[ !1 ri D\ H ry H •\ •\ YR n n rt n n'rt n n ry% H ry K ri n ri ry n R ri R n ri R rl R R n R rt, R R It r rt rt r H R R R R n ri ri 'ri H ry. ri R R !1 R n H H n ri R R H n ri H R n H R ri R, R H n h ry, 4 •R R {1 *t T I' rl •] R R R R n R R R R R R It R m R R R R R Il R R R R R R R R '1 R R '\ '1 R' n rl H H !i R n R R n n H 'R R 9 R. R n n n R n R R R R 'ry .„ R R •1 ry R ry rt R ry R ry .1 R R R _.� ri ri R ry' RR R R ry H n R n n R ry �R R R n It R R n H R n ry R n R K •� ry 7 ry ry r� R_I �1 rt r�H' R •'t r� R ry ry n R TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9- /- D TO: g5PAOZMEE,14 @ C/TY OF CHA4 JNps55&a PROJECT: H14CCA 41ee-GJ I S PROJECTNUMBER: 0510-0,67 RE: ITEMSINCLUDED: gev. (),exQ'),j4G' SHARMeWAI , W LC0e,�D i s -Aff- REvtseD c517 -E- pL/4-� FO2 Z FOLG S 1-ze 60PIE 5 fzeDUGEll So% wtv4 -THE REvr5io4 Z PrREA5 H14HU6H?&-D (YELLO W) Apy QvesrtoNs P66hs6 61414 q-5z-qz2-3zzc� T"tr s s7�RV45' From the desk of... STEVE UDHOLM K K DESIGN 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 phone: 952.922.3226 fax: 952.922.3231 RUUD LIGHTING . b.o M1.a l0 1.+ l.o b.e b.o b.o b.e b.e 1.o b.o b.a b.o to l.a 1.o b.e to 1.o is b.a 1.a 1s bw b.o i.a b.o bs b.a b.a b.a b.o b e b.+ b.a b.a b.e to is is b.a is ba roa 1.0 1.0 l.o bo 1.0 1.r b. 1r bo le 1.0 9.0 L it b.r 1.a 1.e b.r L ------------- - . e 1.r l.a l.o Y.a 1.r b.r it l.e b.a 1.e 1.r ro.a Y.e ro.o Y.a b.e h.a L.r S.r is b.a L 1.a L S.r 1.r ie 5 e L l.0 1.r t.o 1 • 1s D e i.. 5.0 1.+ 1.a 1. \s 1.+ i l.a 1 la is \.+ \.a b.r b.a l.o la Lo ro.a b.e l.a l.o L Ys la 9.a le ro.e l.a to is h.r 1.a 1.o t.o Y.r ro.e 1.+ 1.o Y.e to b.o ro.a M1.e b.a b.o is b.e 1.e D.e a . l.. S. Le i.a a 5s t.a 1.a b.a 1 0 1.r b.o 1.o f.a b.e b n b.a b.a 9.a i. t.a M1.a 9.0 9n b.a b.e l.e M1.a 9.0 le b.o io bs b.a t.e b.e b.e b.e b.o b.e b.e b.r to b . b.o b.o b.o b.. b.x b.z is L ].e 5.+ l.e is 5.a ba b.o 1.0 to f_o l.o b.o bs l.0 1.0 1 0 4a b.e Lr it is is b.a 1.o b.a b.r ro.o i.e ro.o 1.0 1.0 to b.o b.e l0 t a t.o 1.o b.o io 1s bs bn b.� i. b.a b. b.+ to s S.a )s b.. h.a 1.0 1s b.o 1.r t+ l.o l.e i+ L 1.a M1.r bw l.o Yw i.+ 1w 1.o b.e to l.a 1.a t.o 1s b.o l.o l.e ro.r to 1.e 1.r is b.o :.. L t. la L M1.x 1 l.a r S r ].+ to a 1.a Ys Yw b.+ M1.e 1w M1.a Yw S.o r 1s t.a 1s t 1. 9 M1+ r 9.x is : i b 1s r Y_s Ys t b. t a 1.a s L+ ro.+ 1. ]: 5s 4a L S.r 5s la ro.a l.a 1.r Lr is b.a M1. 1. 9 + t.+ 5.z l.a ] .o ].+ s 5.a L+ s b.a Ss 1.0 1.r it 9.o Y.e LAC 2 417 -M & LPR2 417-M 1+ is is D.e Y.e Y.a l.a %A Y.a M1.a b.a %A %A >r %A la Y.e 1.a 1.a l.e 6' DIRECT MOUNT l.a M1.e b.o b.as i+ S.a ) s b z b. i ]. • z b ). 5.a b.o le 5. 1.a iz },a 5.+ S.a l.+ b� 5.+ 1.a 5. 1.a 5s S. 1s }.. 5a + 1.+ 1.a a 5.a is S.a ]s 5.. 1.. l.0 1.. 5.e Y.o . b. 1.. b.a a is 1.a it S• row l.a b.a 1.0 1.r M1.e -.. l+ 0 1.a 5.e 5.r is iz bs 5.r h+ 1.a 1. i.+ Y.a Ss i. 1.a 1.+ + t.a 1.a s 1 • ]+ )a ].z 1.r 1z 1.+ 1.o Lr b.+ + b.a la 1.o r 1.+ 1.r b e 5.a Sw 1w it 5.r L POLE flEIGNI- 15' L ie 9.0 • D. 5. s b_+ t. to l.o ba Lo l.o b.o b.o l.o to ro.e t.o b.o M1.o 1.0 1.a le L 5.e % iw 5a 1. 1.a a %A b.a b %A s 5.+ � s l.x i.o 5s V. b. be i. Lo b.e V. b.o b.e be ba 1a is b.a b. b. 1LOT V,b.. V. V. b.e b.a b.o b.o b.. b.e l.o i.o b.a b.o b.a l.e l.o 1.r a 1. 1.o f.e b. b.a 5. �s 1.a 5.s SA 4. A+ l.e b wmmvee 6LeyF[I Awape-z 16 Womum �o BASE flZ.= I' V. a h. b.o A n n -o.o •• %W'L4n Paeo-o.m b ELEVATION }' 1.o ro 1. t.a Y.o is 9.o De 1.o is a 9.e 9.0 1 b. 5. s ).e + Ss S.a + 1 k.a .a t+ Y.a M1.z i.a b. L+ to !.e ef011gE1%+%RBIYIZ YAO f.e V. 1 a f • 9. b.+ f.e L+ h.a .r .+ 1. .a .r .+ Le 1.r S.a S.a a ] )s ).a 5.a + 1 ].a ).r t.e FUTHG GREEx ix�mnanre vaiunlRl b.o 1.0 ]s ks s 1.e ks 1. ].+ .a b.+ 1a is bs Ys b.a 1 a La 5.a b.a M1.o 1s 1s 1.e W,m, -aae po uRE WONT "AF0 IT R.amum-Tx WI .NOUN iTaro V. unimum oa WILgxG+AOIMiE0:4 ApG ew'Mn R+uo-13e IA41.1n Raeo.3.A ��:i AFG b.a 1.0 b.e 9.e b.e t.a M1.a S.a io Y.r to .r l.e 9.0 .r 1• :.r i.e S.a to S.a a S.x i+ 1+ b.a La S. l.a is b.e 1.o Sw b.o t.r ie ERpIXP5e6ET%NISOSTAMF9 wwos CUST W $Tp,ER REIXIESTEO DESIGN L Y. lw 1.a 1.r L Le 1 r to l.e 1. 1. :.e l.a l.a 1.e a l.r le I, la M1.+ %.o S. t.a b.a %.a %.o is %.o 9.a b.s t.o 1-e lo b -e l.a %.a 1.o 1.o %.+ %.s b_. i_s 1s b.� 5 s 1s i.a + }.a )- ].a i )s .a 1.a 1.a 1.a ro e l.e l.a 1s 1.o b.e MpTM%INL PEOURFO EO111AENi' - ryl. pSeSI5C142 (t5'%1' SQMRE 6TEEL PIXES, $11%ilf IY%Mn V. b.a b.a b.o b.o 1.o b.e 1.e %.o 1.0 V. Vo b it t.e V. %.o I.e b.e b.o V. b.a b.a l.. V. V. V. f.o b.o %.o 1.a l.o b.o V. 1.o %.o %.1 f.a ba 5.+ . i S.a 1+ 5s a 1.a l.a bs V. V. i.. V. b.e 9.e 111-P84SVS M(Is'%rSWARESTEELp ) to V. V. b.o S.a o 1.a 1.o i.a b.o la 1.o b.r a V. b.o le l.a b.a Le i.a b.a S.e l.o V. Y.o 1.a b.. V. N. b.r I.. b.e b.o V. V. %.o V. 1.z tz s.a5.a . bs l.a bs b.o V. V. . V. 'e.e p1Y�9 RRlsE x b.o 1 n b.o b.o 1s 5.+ 5 e 1 o D.o b o L+ i+ 1.e M1.o ie 1 a b.e b.o 1.e b.o b.e bs 5.a b.o b.e i.a S.o io 1.r l.+ 1.s V. 1.s V. 1.0 l.a V. b. 1, V. V. V. 1.o bs b.r la 1.a 1.r is 1.0 9s 1.r 1 V. V. V. le b.e b.o is 1.0 5.r 1.+ is 1s 1.o b.a ie i+ 1.e Y.a la 1r Y.a 1.o ie S.+ L 1.0 voi u ucxT veva %eca�wuio%nws. 1.0 1.r Yw 1. Y.r l.a 1.o b.a �.Y+aN als�w Mlylyda w4+++lw pr}t a� m�YWubI+OIMA �pWam�ellM1VM 7�L:'�F" �y��,.'7 'lL�R:z[Ttc•r�"a•:� �'��Lz:Lff�a, •4-p��®.. 1r:T'mn•r�e7 t .�.. �E�Ic:•iebal?•: C.•: �{{-7CE:41L!iaL3FLaQc:7C.u� �.Y+aN als�w Mlylyda w4+++lw pr}t a� m�YWubI+OIMA �pWam�ellM1VM 4 The industry's largest selection of bag stands for yot I HEAVY DUTY CADDY RACKS Ideal for practice tees at golf course and driving ranges. Made from heavy gauge steel coated with a baked -on high density plastic. Will not tip or bend and can be folded for easy storage. 35"H x 13"W x 22"D . Weight 10% lbs. Ships UPS. #77554 - Heavy Duty Caddy Rack. Green #77556 - Heavy Duty Caddy Rack,Yellow PAR AIDE BAG STAND So simple, and so functional! Two 9" spit into the ground. Powder coated tubular sl Weight. 4lbs. #10100-00 - Bag stand, Black #10100-02 - Bag Stand, Dark Green #10100-99 - Bag Stand, Custom Color. BAG CADDIE From Standard Golf, one of the most economical and easy to use! The sharpened spikes let you step it into place easily. Holds any size bag, from a junior's to a pros. Great for the practice tee and around the clubhouse. Made of'h" steel and finished with a thermosetting polyester coating. Color: Black 7Wo per carton. Weight: 13 lbs. #36800 - Bag Caddie ADIRONDACK BAG STAND Our Nantucket inspired bag stand will make an impressive statement on your tee line. American made of weather resistant recycled plastic partial assembly required. 29"H x 22-W x 20"D. Colors: White and Green. Weight: 24 lbs. #77580 - Adirondack Bag Stand, White #77581 - Adirondack Bag Stand, Green Seepage 114 for matdnngAdirondack Chair! Our new line of bag stands es u sure [o raaice ranges and learning centers. Made to withstand the elem�a is line features 48" PVC coating over 2m rued Y/." round tubing. Expanded metal is also PVC Sp Q. All fasteners are corrosion resistant. Color: Green and B Ships common carrier. l O, #43250 #43260 #43250 - Double Bag Rest, 8' Holds 16 golf bags. 331h"H x 961/."W x 39'12"D. Weight 265 lbs. #43260 - Single Bag Rest, 8' Holds 8 golf bags. 33'12"H x 964."W x 39'/4"D. Weight 150 lbs. #43255 - Double Bag Rest, 6' Holds 12 golf bags. `l()A 33'12 H x 72'1."W x 39"D. X #43265 - Single Bag Rest, 6' Holds 6 golf bags. lit 220 33'h. x 721h"W x 39'/ID. Weight 130 lbs. #43270 - Single Bag Pa Holds 8 golf bags. 33'/r"H x 96'1."W x 39'h" #43275 - Single Bag Re Holds 6 golf bags. 33'/,"H x 72'/PW x 39'/=' Document No. OFFICE OF THE A 4 4 2 98 0 COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Fee $ 46 00 Check#. 15855 certified Recorded on 06-09-2006 at 11:00 �fAME] PM 442980 & 1--111111111111111111111 Carl W. Couou Recorder r CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT HALLA GREENS- PLANNING CASE NO. 05-39 SITE PLAN REVIEW 2003-07 SPR SPECIAL PROVISIONS RESTATED AND AMENDED SITE PLAN AGREEMENT AGREEMENT dated March 20, 2006, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City"), and DONALD E HALLA & SANDRA J CWAYNA HALLA, husband and wife (the "Developer"). 1. Request for Site Plan Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan for the construction of a Club House, a Maintenance Building, a golf ball dispensing building and a lean-to for a golf course (referred to in this Permit as the "project"). The land is legally described as: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, Block 2; and Lots 1 and 2, Block 3; Lots 1 and 2 Block 4; Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 5; Outlot A; Together with vacated Columbine Trail, vacated Hibiscus Trail; vacated Periwinkle Trail; and vacated Halla Nursery Drive West; all in the recorded plat of Halla Great Plains Addition, Carver County, Minnesota. 2. Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enters into this Permit and furnishes the security required by it. /j,4 --15 &,,I -e,& 16&15e.0 SCANT o 3. Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Permit, the written terms shall control. The plans are: • Plan A (1) -Site Plan dated July 18, 2003, revised August 25, 2003, prepared by Herfort Boby Golf Course Architects and Sathre-Berquist, Inc., and Key Plan dated January 6, 2006, prepared by K. K. Design. • Plan B (2) -Grading Plan dated July 18, 2003, revised August 25, 2003, prepared by Herfort Boby Golf Course Architects and Sathre-Berquist, Inc. • Plan C (3) -Buffer Yard Planting Plan dated July 18, 2003, revised August 25, 2003, prepared by Herfort Boby Golf Course Architects and Sathre-Berquist, Inc. • Plan D (4)- Club House Site Plan, partial site plan dated January 6, 2006, prepared by K. K. Design. • Plan E (5)- Construction Details dated July 18, 2003, prepared by Herfort Boby Golf Course Architects and Sathre-Berquist, Inc. • Plan F- Site Map/Property Description dated July 18, 2003, prepared by Sathre- Berquist, Inc. • Plan G- Elevations dated August 13, 2003, prepared by Lester. • Plan H- Club House Main Level plan dated January 6, 2006, prepared by K. K. Design. • Plan I- Roof Plan, Reflected Ceiling Plan and Equipment Platform plan dated January 6, 2006, prepared by K. K. Design. • Plan J- Club House detail plan dated January 6, 2006, prepared by K. K. Design. • Plan K- Ball Washing Building, Teaching Shelter, and Maintenance ElevationClub House detail plan dated January 6, 2006 and revised and received on March 14, 2006, prepared by K. K. Design. • Plan L- Existing Plantings along property lines dated January 6, 2006, prepared by K. K. Design. 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by August 15, 2006. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Permit, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or equivalent ("security") for $6,300 (Landscaping, Grading and Erosion Control). This amount has been calculated at a rate of 110% of the actual value of the improvement. 6. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall he in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: Don Halla Contact Person: Sandy Halla 6601 Mohawk Trail Edina, MN 55439 (952)941-8422 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Telephone (952) 227-1100. 7. Other Special Conditions. On September 15, 2003, the City Council adopted the following motion: SITE PLAN REVIEW "The City Council approves Site Plan Review 2003-7 for the construction of a Club House and a Maintenance Building for a golf course as shown in plans dated August 25, 2003, and amended Site Plan Review 2003-7 SPR — Planning Case 05-39, for the construction of a Club House, a Maintenance Building, a golf ball washing building and a lean-to for a golf course as shown in plans dated received January 6, 2006, with the following conditions: A. Approval of the Site Plan Review application is contingent upon approval of Conditional Use Permit 2003-4. B. All trees to be preserved must be protected by tree protection fencing. Fencing must be installed prior to grading. C. No vegetation may be removed within the bluff impact zone. D. The applicant shall provide a pedestrian/bikeway connection to the City's trail system at the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Pioneer Trail. E. Fire Department Conditions: 1. Contact the Building Official and Fire Marshal to discuss the sprinkling requirements for the clubhouse and storage/maintenance building. 2. If a Fire Hydrant is available, a 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Qwest, Excel Energy, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 3. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs and yellow curbing will be required. Please contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of signs and curbs to be painted yellow. 4. The builder must comply with Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division regarding maximum allowable size of domestic water on a combination water/sprinkler supply line. This is only if a sprinkler is required. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division Policy #36-1994. 5. The builder must comply with the Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division regarding premise identification. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention division Policy #29-1992. 6. A post indicator valve will be required on any building that will have a sprinkler system. 7. Submit radius turns and dimensions to City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. F. Building Official Conditions: 1. Submit a detailed floor plan of the clubhouse so the occupancy classification and fine suppression requirements can be determined. 2. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. An accessible route must be provided to all facilities on the site. 4. Submit a design of the on-site sewage treatment system for review and approval. Two sites must be provided and these sites must be protected from damage prior to beginning any construction activity on the site. The system must comply with the requirements of Minnesota Rules 7080.0600. 5. Detailed occupancy related requirements cannot be reviewed until complete plans are submitted. 6. The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review, permit procedures and fire suppression options. G. Engineering Department Conditions: 1. Staff recommends that Type I silt fence be used along the northwesterly and southerly property lines. The applicant should be aware that any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. All disturbed areas are required to be restored with seed and mulch within two weeks of grading completion. 2. Add the following City of Chanhassen Latest Detail Plates Numbers: 5201, 5203, 5207, 5300, and 3001 3. The applicant is responsible to obtain and comply with all regulators agency permits. 4. On the grading plan add a bench mark. H. The applicant must submit detailed architectural plans for the club house and maintenance building that meet the design ordinance requirement. 4 I. The applicant shall enter into a Site Plan Agreement and provide financial guarantees to insure compliance with the project. J. Only one (1) monument sign may be permitted on the site. The total sign area shall not exceed twenty-four (24) square feet of sign display area, nor be more than five (5) feet in height. K. The applicant is responsible to obtain and comply with NhMT and Carver County permits for the new access. L. Per MnDOT's review memo dated September 2, 2003, the need for a net along TH 101 will be evaluated upon completion of the golf course. If it is determined that a net is needed, then the applicant will be required to install it. M. The applicant shall comply with all DNR Water Appropriation Permit requirements. (The DNR examines a copy of the well log and the test pumping results before they make decisions on DNR appropriation permits.) N. Comply with all conditions of the Carver County review letter dated 8/29/03. O. Comply with all conditions of the Mn/DOT review letter dated 8/26/03. P. Applicant shall increase landscape plantings to meet minimum requirements for parking lot trees. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the City and approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. Q. Applicant shall fully screen parking lots from adjacent roadways through the use of berming or increased landscaping. R. The applicant must submit detailed architectural plans for the maintenance building, golf ball washing building, and lean-to that meet the design ordinance requirement. S. Comply with all conditions of the MnDOT review letter dated November 23, 2005. T. The temporary 120 square -foot octagon building may remain on the site for a time period not to exceed six month after City Council approval and must be removed within two weeks after a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. The building shall be located in the parking lot. U. The applicant is responsible for obtaining and complying with MnDOT and Carver County permits and approval on any grading that takes place along the north and west side of the property. V. All disturbed areas are required to be restored with seed and mulch within two weeks of grading completion. W. All plans must be signed by a professional civil engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. X. The golf ball washing and golf ball dispensing building shall not exceed 100 square feet in area. Y. The maintenance building may not be used for "Halla Nursery" related items nor exceed 2,040 square feet in area. The outdoor storage area shall be fully screened by a board on board wooden fence. The height of the fence shall not exceed 61/2 feet. Z. The trash enclosure located west of the maintenance building shall be constructed of materials similar to the club house building. A.A. No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety lights which include parking lot lights, soffit lights and drive aisle lights. The height of the light poles in the parking lot and along the entrance driveway (total of five fixtures) may not exceed 15 feet. The remaining light fixtures may not exceed 4 feet in height. All light fixtures must meet ordinance requirements. All lights with the exception of the light located in the center island of the parking lot and the club house soffit lights, shall be shut off one hour after sunset." 8. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Permit are attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) Gerhardt, City Manager , Mayor The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Nay of (2006, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. KAREN I ENGELHARDT -'NOT*Y UBLI Notary Public -Minnesota My Commission Expres Jin 31, 2010 0 DEVELOPER: 1. "W-01 A Impow'A"r BY:� Sandra J. Cwayna la STATE OF NIINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF G The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this -L7 day of, 2006 by Donald E. Halla, husband to Sandra J. ^lrJllllrlllJJJJIJII!!!J!!!J! •• 1 1 r rirrr�rrrlill r/!r!!!/!J] Qaa lla. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OFII'eye kjeP�(/ / G The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this < 0 day of, 2006 by Sandra J. Cwayna Balla, wife of Donald E. ANN M. WALDSCHMIDT NOTARY PUBLIC NOTARY PUBLIC -MINNESOTA My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2010 CONSENT Owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Permit, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this —LI day of 2006 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (SS COUNTY OF �r(y E - _ _a The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ZZ day of 2006, byN L !) G a/k/a Don g. Halla, Downer- NOTARY PUBLIC City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 J!!lIIIIlIIlJJIIIfIIIIfIIJ!! 10, ' 1l ✓!! lJ!lJlIJIlIIIIJJ_II IIIIIJ)� CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT EXHIBIT "B" GENERAL CONDITIONS Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk; 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City; 3) the site plan has been recorded with the County Recorder's Office of the County where the project is located; and 4) the City Planner has issued a letter that the foregoing conditions have been satisfied and then the Developer may proceed. Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and groundcover required as a condition of site plan approval that die shall be promptly replaced. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building permits are issued, the erosion control plan (Plan B) shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary groundcover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties W recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan, schedule, or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authorize removal of the erosion control measures. 5. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan (Plan C) shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease-free at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer or his contractor(s) shall post maintenance bonds (Miller Davis Company Form No. 1636 or equal) or other security acceptable to the City to secure the warranties at the time of final acceptance. 7. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by it and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses, which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. 10 B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attomeys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and construction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. 8. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. Liu IM. ,1 -MO A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on-site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Permit. 11 D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Permit by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Permit is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Occupancy. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Recording. This Permit shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. I. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. 12 J. Construction Hours. The normal construction hours under this contract shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the site plan, the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District; 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. M. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers to enter into this Development Contract. 13 N. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning neither the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. giplanr2005 planning cases\05-39 halls greens 03-07 site plan amendmenAsite plan agreementdoc 14 CITY OF CIMUSSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952 227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952,227,1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Part 8 Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 1952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Warks 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.6chanhassen.mn.us • April 6, 2006 Mr. John Kosmas KK Design 6112 Excelsior Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Re: Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 Dear Mr. Kosmas: This letter is to formally notify that on March 20, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council adopted the following motions: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT "The City Council approve an amendment to Conditional Use Permit 2003-4 CUP — Planning Case 05-39, for the construction of a golf course with a club house as shown in plans dated received January 6, 2006, with the following amendment to condition #9 of the existing conditional use permit and adding conditions 10, 11 and 12: 9. No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety lights which include parking lot lights, soffit lights and drive aisle lights. The height of the light poles in the parking lot and along the entrance driveway (total of five fixtures) may not exceed 15 feet. The remaining light fixtures may not exceed 4 feet in height. All light fixtures must meet ordinance requirements. All lights with the exception of the light located in the center island of the parking lot and the club house soffit lights, shall be shut off one hour after sunset. 10. The applicant/owner/lessee shall apply pesticides only when needed. Use products that are most effective, target specific, and present the least hazards to people, wildlife, and the environment. 11. A retail pro shop is permitted within the clubhouse. Retail operations shall not occupy more than 20% of one floor. Retail sales are limited to food, beverages, and golf -related items. 12. Hours of maintenance operation shall be limited to Civil Sunrise to Nautical Sunset." SCANNED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools. a charming downtown, thriving businesses. winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. 0 • Mr. John Kosmas Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 April 6, 2006 Page 2 SITE PLAN REVIEW "The City Council approve an amendment to Site Plan Review 2003-7 SPR — Planning Case 05- 39, for the construction of a Club House, a Maintenance Building, a golf ball washing building and a lean-to for a golf course as shown in plans dated received January 6, 2006, with the following added conditions: Applicant shall increase landscape plantings to meet minimum requirements for parking lot trees. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the City and approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. Applicant shall fully screen parking lots from adjacent roadways through the use of berming or increased landscaping. 3. The applicant must submit detailed architectural plans for the maintenance building, golf ball washing building, and lean-to that meet the design ordinance requirement. 4. Comply with all conditions of the MnDOT review letter dated November 23, 2005. 5. The temporary 120 square -foot octagon building may remain on the site for a time period not to exceed six month after City Council approval and must be removed within two weeks after a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. The building shall be located in the parking lot. 6. The applicant is responsible for obtaining and complying with MnDOT and Carver County permits and approval on any grading that takes place along the north and west side of the property. All disturbed areas are required to be restored with seed and mulch within two weeks of grading completion. 8. All plans must be signed by a professional civil engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. 9. The golf ball washing and golf ball dispensing building shall not exceed 100 square feet in area. 10. The maintenance building may not be used for "Halla Nursery" related items nor exceed 2,040 square feet in area. The outdoor storage area shall be fully screened by a board on board wooden fence. The height of the fence shall not exceed 6'/z feet. 11. The trash enclosure located west of the maintenance building shall be constructed of materials similar to the club house building. Mr. John Kosmas Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 April 6, 2006 Page 3 12. No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety lights which include parking lot lights, soffit lights and drive aisle lights. The height of the light poles in the parking lot and along the entrance driveway (total of five fixtures) may not exceed 15 feet. The remaining light fixtures may not exceed 4 feet in height. All light fixtures must meet ordinance requirements. All lights with the exception of the light located in the center island of the parking lot and the club house soffit lights, shall be shut off one hour after sunset." Enclosed is a Site Plan Agreement for your clients to sign. All signatures must be notarized. A building permit cannot be issued until the Site Plan Agreement has been executed and recorded at Carver County and financial guarantees submitted to the City. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sharmeen AJ-Jaff Senior Planner Enc. g:Nplant2005 planning cases\05-39 halla greens 03-07 site plan anwndnxnt\lena of approval.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT HALLA GREENS- PLANNING CASE NO. 05-39 SITE PLAN REVIEW 2003-07 SPR SPECIAL PROVISIONS RESTATED AND AMENDED SITE PLAN AGREEMENT AGREEMENT dated March 20, 2006, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City"), and DONALD E HALLA & SANDRA J CWAYNA HALLA, (the "Developer"). 1. Request for Site Plan Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan for the construction of a Club House, a Maintenance Building, a golf ball dispensing building and a lean-to for a golf course (referred to in this Permit as the "project'). The land is legally described as: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, Block 2; and Lots 1 and 2, Block 3; Lots I and 2 Block 4; Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 5; Outlot A; Together with vacated Columbine Trail, vacated Hibiscus Trail; vacated Periwinkle Trail; and vacated Halla Nursery Drive West; all in the recorded plat of Halla Great Plains Addition, Carver County, Minnesota. 2. Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enters into this Permit and furnishes the security required by it. 0 P 3. Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Permit, the written terms shall control. The plans are: • Plan A (1) -Site Plan dated July 18, 2003, revised August 25, 2003, prepared by Herfort Boby Golf Course Architects and Sathre-Berquist, Inc., and Key Plan dated January 6, 2006, prepared by K. K. Design. • Plan B (2) -Grading Plan dated July 18, 2003, revised August 25, 2003, prepared by Herfort Boby Golf Course Architects and Sathre-Berquist, Inc. • Plan C (3) -Buffer Yard Planting Plan dated July 18, 2003, revised August 25, 2003, prepared by Herfort Boby Golf Course Architects and Sathre-Berquist, Inc. • Plan D (4)- Club House Site Plan, partial site plan dated January 6, 2006, prepared by K. K. Design. • Plan E (5)- Construction Details dated July 18, 2003, prepared by Herfort Boby Golf Course Architects and Sathre-Berquist, Inc. • Plan F- Site Map/Property Description dated July 18, 2003, prepared by Sathre- Berquist, Inc. • Plan G- Elevations dated August 13, 2003, prepared by Lester. • Plan H- Club House Main Level plan dated January 6, 2006, prepared by K. K. Design. • Plan I- Roof Plan, Reflected Ceiling Plan and Equipment Platform plan dated January 6, 2006, prepared by K. K. Design. • Plan J- Club House detail plan dated January 6, 2006, prepared by K. K. Design. • Plan K- Ball Washing Building, Teaching Shelter, and Maintenance ElevationClub House detail plan dated January 6, 2006 and revised and received on March 14, 2006, prepared by K. K. Design. • Plan U Existing Plantings along property lines dated January 6, 2006, prepared by K. K. Design. 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by August 15, 2006. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Permit, the Developer shall fumish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or equivalent ("security") for $6,300 (Landscaping, Grading and Erosion Control). This amount has been calculated at a rate of 110% of the actual value of the improvement. 0 0 6. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: Don Halla Contact Person: Sandy Halla 6601 Mohawk Trail Edina, MN 55439 (952)941-8422 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Telephone (952) 227-1100. 7. Other Special Conditions. On September 15, 2003, the City Council adopted the following motion: SITE PLAN REVIEW "The City Council approves Site Plan Review 2003-7 for the construction of a Club House and a Maintenance Building for a golf course as shown in plans dated August 25, 2003, and amended Site Plan Review 2003-7 SPR — Planning Case 05-39, for the construction of a Club House, a Maintenance Building, a golf ball washing building and a lean-to for a golf course as shown in plans dated received January 6, 2006, with the following conditions: A. Approval of the Site Plan Review application is contingent upon approval of Conditional Use Permit 2003-4. B. All trees to be preserved must be protected by tree protection fencing. Fencing must be installed prior to grading. C. No vegetation may be removed within the bluff impact zone. D. The applicant shall provide a pedestrian/bikeway connection to the City's trail system at the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Pioneer Trail. E. Fire Department Conditions: 1. Contact the Building Official and Fire Marshal to discuss the sprinkling requirements for the clubhouse and storage/maintenance building. 2. If a Fire Hydrant is available, a 10 -foot clear space must he maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Qwest, Excel Energy, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. • 3. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs and yellow curbing will be required. Please contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of signs and curbs to be painted yellow. 4. The builder must comply with Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division regarding maximum allowable size of domestic water on a combination water/sprinkler supply line. This is only if a sprinkler is required. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division Policy #36-1994. 5. The builder must comply with the Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division regarding premise identification. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention division Policy #29-1992. 6. A post indicator valve will be required on any building that will have a sprinkler system. 7. Submit radius turns and dimensions to City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. F. Building Official Conditions: 1. Submit a detailed floor plan of the clubhouse so the occupancy classification and fire suppression requirements can be determined. 2. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. An accessible route must be provided to all facilities on the site. 4. Submit a design of the on-site sewage treatment system for review and approval. Two sites must be provided and these sites must be protected from damage prior to beginning any construction activity on the site. The system must comply with the requirements of Minnesota Rules 7080.0600. 5. Detailed occupancy related requirements cannot be reviewed until complete plans are submitted. 6. The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review, permit procedures and fire suppression options. G. Engineering Department Conditions: 1. Staff recommends that Type I silt fence be used along the northwesterly and southerly property lines. The applicant should be aware that any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. All disturbed areas are required to be restored with seed and mulch within two weeks of grading completion. 2. Add the following City of Chanhassen Latest Detail Plates Numbers: 5201, 5203, 5207, 5300, and 3001 3. The applicant is responsible to obtain and comply with all regulators agency permits. 4. On the grading plan add a bench mark. H. The applicant must submit detailed architectural plans for the club house and maintenance building that meet the design ordinance requirement. 0 I. The applicant shall enter into a Site Plan Agreement and provide financial guarantees to insure compliance with the project. J. Only one (1) monument sign may be permitted on the site. The total sign area shall not exceed twenty-four (24) square feet of sign display area, nor be more than five (5) feet in height. K. The applicant is responsible to obtain and comply with MnDOT and Carver County permits for the new access. L. Per MnDOT's review memo dated September 2, 2003, the need for a net along TH.161 will be evaluated upon completion of the golf course. If it is determined that a net is needed, then the applicant will be required to install it. M. The applicant shall comply with all DNR Water Appropriation Permit requirements. (The DNR examines a copy of the well log and the test pumping results before they make decisions on DNR appropriation permits.) N. Comply with all conditions of the Carver County review letter dated 8/29/03. O. Comply with all conditions of the Mn/DOT review letter dated 8/26/03. P. Applicant shall increase landscape plantings to meet minimum requirements for parking lot trees. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the City and approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. Q. Applicant shall fully screen parking lots from adjacent roadways through the use of berming or increased landscaping. R. The applicant must submit detailed architectural plans for the maintenance building, golf ball washing building, and lean-to that meet the design ordinance requirement. Comply with all conditions of the MnDOT review letter dated November 23, 2005. T. The temporary 120 square -foot octagon building may remain on the site for a time period not to exceed six month after City Council approval and must be removed within two weeks after a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. The building shall be located in the parking lot. U. The applicant is responsible for obtaining and complying with MnDOT and Carver County permits and approval on any grading that takes place along the north and west side of the property. V. All disturbed areas are required to be restored with seed and mulch within two weeks of grading completion. W. All plans must be signed by a professional civil engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. 61 0 • X. The golf ball washing and golf ball dispensing building shall not exceed 100 square feet in area. Y. The maintenance building may not be used for "Halla Nursery" related items nor exceed 2,040 square feet in area. The outdoor storage area shall be fully screened by a board on board wooden fence. The height of the fence shall not exceed 6'/z feet. Z. The trash enclosure located west of the maintenance building shall be constructed of materials similar to the club house building. AA. No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety lights which include parking lot lights, soffit lights and drive aisle lights. The height of the light poles in the parking lot and along the entrance driveway (total of five fixtures) may not exceed 15 feet. The remaining light fixtures may not exceed 4 feet in height. All light fixtures must meet ordinance requirements. All lights with the exception of the light located in the center island of the parking lot and the club house soffit lights, shall be shut off one hour after sunset." 8. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Permit are attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein. Tom Furlong, Mayor (SEAL) Todd Gerhardt, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this—day of 2006, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. v NOTARY PUBLIC 0 STATE OF MINNESOTA (ss COUNTY OF DEVELOPER: OW II Donald E. Halla Sandra J. Cwayna Halla The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2006 by Donald E. Halla. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2006 by Sandra J. Cwayna Halla. 7 NOTARY PUBLIC 0 0 CONSENT Owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Permit, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this _ day of STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF ) No By Its The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2006, by City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 N NOTARY PUBLIC 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT EXHHBIT "B" GENERAL CONDITIONS • Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk; 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City; 3) the site plan has been recorded with the County Recorders Office of the County where the project is located; and 4) the City Planner has issued a letter that the foregoing conditions have been satisfied and then the Developer may proceed. 2. Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and groundcover required as a condition of site plan approval that die shall be promptly replaced. 3. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building permits are issued, the erosion control plan (Plan B) shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary groundcover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties 0 • recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan, schedule, or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developers and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authorize removal of the erosion control measures. 5. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan (Plan C) shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease-free at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer or his contractor(s) shall post maintenance bonds (Miller Davis Company Form No. 1636 or equal) or other security acceptable to the City to secure the warranties at the time of final acceptance. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees hamiless from claims made by it and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses, which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. 10 0 B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attomeys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and construction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. 8. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 9. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on-site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Permit. 11 0 0 D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Permit by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Permit is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Occupancy. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Recording. This Permit shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. 12 0 • Construction Hours. The normal construction hours under this contract shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the site plan, the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District; Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. M. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall fumish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers to enter into this Development Contract. 13 0 N. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning neither the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. gAplan\2005 planning casest05-39 halls gurus 03-07 site plan amendment\site plan ag rnm tdm 14 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 05-39 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, November 15, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Site Plan Amendment for the expansion and redesign of a club house on property located on the southeast comer of Great Plains Blvd. (Highway 101) and Pioneer Trail — HALLA GREENS. Applicant: Don Halla. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner Email: saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1134 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on November 3, 2005, 2005) Halla Greens March 20, 2006 Page 2 The first option reflects 4 foot high lights. The level of illumination is minimal leaving dark areas within the parking lot. 4 Foot High Light fixture The shaded area is the extent of the illumination. I an The second option shows a mix of 15 foot and 4 foot high light fixtures. This option provides an improved level of illumination. M . 15 Foot High Light fixture .......... ■ IlkI loll A Ih h� Theshaded area is the extent of the illumination. j Staff is recommending all lights with the exception of the light located in the center island of the parking lot be shut off one hour after sunset. Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 you have been contacting staff via phone to get direction on how to design Fax: 952.227.1110 different elements within the "Short Course" site located at 495 Pioneer Trail. Building Inspections The design of the site was completed and finalized at the time of site plan and Phone: 952.227.1180 conditional use permit approval. Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering This letter is intended to explain information needed in order for the City to issue Phone: 952.227.1180 a building permit for improvements proposed at "address of property" Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance • A grading plan consistent with the plans approved by the City Council Phone: 952.227.1140 . A landscaping plan consistent with the plans approved by the City Council Fax 952.227.1110 • A site plan showing the location of all proposed buildings and parking lot Park & Recreation consistent with plans approved by the City Council P:952.211 Fax:952227.1110 • Complete building Plans which include all architectural and structural Recreation Center details including elevations and exterior materials consistent with plans 2310 Coulter Boulevard approved by the City Council Phone: 952.227.1400 • Drainage calculations Fax: 952.227.1404 • Septic System design Planning & Natural Resources Submit two copies of all required plans and information for review by city staff. Phone: 952.227.1130 The plans must be signed by design professionals licensed in Minnesota as Fax: 952.227.1110 required by State law. Public Works 1591 Park Road If the submitted plans are significantly different from those approved by the City P21.1 Fax: 952.227.1310 Council, an amendment will be necessary which will require a Proval by the City Council. Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Sincerely, � fax: 95 1110 webb Site site wxw.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Sharmeen Al-Jaff Steven Torell Mak Sweidan Lori Haak, Senior Planner Building Official Engineer Water Resources Coordinator gAplau\sa\short coursexhalla letter 9-21-05.doc The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gnat place to live, work, and play. September 21, 2005 Don Halla Cl l l OF 10000 Great Plains Boulevard CMNSEN Chaska, MN 55318 7700 Market Boulevard Re: Chanhassen Short Course — File CUP 03-04 PC Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Mr. Halla: Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 you have been contacting staff via phone to get direction on how to design Fax: 952.227.1110 different elements within the "Short Course" site located at 495 Pioneer Trail. Building Inspections The design of the site was completed and finalized at the time of site plan and Phone: 952.227.1180 conditional use permit approval. Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering This letter is intended to explain information needed in order for the City to issue Phone: 952.227.1180 a building permit for improvements proposed at "address of property" Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance • A grading plan consistent with the plans approved by the City Council Phone: 952.227.1140 . A landscaping plan consistent with the plans approved by the City Council Fax 952.227.1110 • A site plan showing the location of all proposed buildings and parking lot Park & Recreation consistent with plans approved by the City Council P:952.211 Fax:952227.1110 • Complete building Plans which include all architectural and structural Recreation Center details including elevations and exterior materials consistent with plans 2310 Coulter Boulevard approved by the City Council Phone: 952.227.1400 • Drainage calculations Fax: 952.227.1404 • Septic System design Planning & Natural Resources Submit two copies of all required plans and information for review by city staff. Phone: 952.227.1130 The plans must be signed by design professionals licensed in Minnesota as Fax: 952.227.1110 required by State law. Public Works 1591 Park Road If the submitted plans are significantly different from those approved by the City P21.1 Fax: 952.227.1310 Council, an amendment will be necessary which will require a Proval by the City Council. Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Sincerely, � fax: 95 1110 webb Site site wxw.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Sharmeen Al-Jaff Steven Torell Mak Sweidan Lori Haak, Senior Planner Building Official Engineer Water Resources Coordinator gAplau\sa\short coursexhalla letter 9-21-05.doc The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gnat place to live, work, and play. T00%1000 3 r F Z tA � a ONI d2HSMIN i � � f SY6 ZSB %V3 WST aU 9009/90%60 G ro9M TF£ le a f o Uf "m WENWff 1e1 9" 11 PARK. STN15 P] PAN. 611115 IS P 1 0 N E E R T R A I L TREES: AT ENTRY DRIVE, ADJACENT TO AND IN PARKING LOT AREA 1B TOTAL 6 PNWNG STNS PRVEM UNEUS, p Fj] = XNGW 11SG'-0" ioa 9 W/ [R x`AT AL L -0' E B .11 In In NEWEEN15 N O�EDHEART PXOPp$m SPOT EUMUNAS EVERGREENS W:w '. TAl rtY E le a f o Uf "m WENWff 1e1 9" 11 PARK. STN15 P] PAN. 611115 IS P 1 0 N E E R T R A I L TREES: AT ENTRY DRIVE, ADJACENT TO AND IN PARKING LOT AREA 1B TOTAL 6 PNWNG STNS I I CLUBHOUSE BUILDING I MIN FLOOR I 9114 815.1 I I wTM 9134 A+ 915.4 L 919.4 + CHIC. PAW _ '. DNE Fleashn EMAG W3 PATI + 919.9 1 8133 - - MT' 91I1_n� .,,WEYJS PATI + 'A' — p Fj] = XNGW 11SG'-0" ioa 9 W/ [R x`AT AL L -0' E B .11 d y _ N O�EDHEART PXOPp$m SPOT EUMUNAS EGImNG rtY E WI11 PUNT'I,.NGSWAU- 3n'• I s 12• 4POST 0 W w � iJSi fhM1� K Sm19' ro xN2 suts vN•amL96 811.3 Dmn .. WPEI 3: ELRB GEIW'FEN T WE. 04. PER lNLGE 4Ydli 9+1.4 MNIl . N,Wm / 4-V39WR Fb= 4-61aFPF rl..f� ¢ 1 CpANIHS RiEPNiED BY 11-`NUGNW V Z 1 FENCE ELEVATION FENCE SECTION 3.Z AND FIE1ll INFgIMAiVM PROAGED WY. .1 GREENS. LLC. _�.`. 55 - 9nA(�WrI,�.G Yvws IGW M4 913.0 —Qu NAi ' l `2 4 Au! N"191 00 A. ]MA '^ " 914.9 BI16 + 913.4 NO.G I I 911 9 6u.o DIRECII000J. I -rlamc 3.49 I SIGN I I CLUBHOUSE BUILDING I MIN FLOOR I 9114 815.1 I I wTM 9134 A+ 915.4 L 919.4 + CHIC. PAW _ '. DNE Fleashn EMAG W3 PATI + 919.9 1 8133 - - MT' 91I1_n� .,,WEYJS PATI + 'A' vast. .. RAGE EMISTK WTIWG qKM \ 1 E U — p Fj] = XNGW 11SG'-0" — b pg E B .11 d y _ N O�EDHEART PXOPp$m SPOT EUMUNAS EGImNG rtY BONLOER ETANNING E WI11 PUNT'I,.NGSWAU- 3n'• I s 12• 4POST 0 W w � iJSi fhM1� vast. .. RAGE EMISTK WTIWG qKM \ 1 E U — LIGXT Po1E G = XNGW 11SG'-0" — ® pg E B .11 d y _ N O�EDHEART PXOPp$m SPOT EUMUNAS N �J" a ? CSSEM ` 0 3n'• I s 12• 4POST 0 W w y� Y K Sm19' ro xN2 suts vN•amL96 ® 2, RECE.4FO SPTR WITS AT SPACE➢ BASES GEIW'FEN T WE. 04. PER lNLGE 4Ydli wREGnauL AGX / F � Fb= rl..f� ¢ 1 CpANIHS RiEPNiED BY ,, IX 'A'AttATA NNWL YN. n' 55391 V Z 1 FENCE ELEVATION FENCE SECTION ulsTlxc oR.E IMAGE SWALE NKAWEM SGN (4W IU- II IED) 21 SF. W:4') ®��T // /� O LILDIXilx1 ,yp�' .;YH3 xuGM I e^ rile /449HHHJddd 0 � QpYJ't 1LS9E'6p'I NCM FLS 0VOA_y{W ® LL Mxxl�T1 1,.zn`:,Lo GrlrPi �e�PWr�"�� V ERIMNCEM'-G" M9 PRCPf111Y uNE Z GRNE ¢ U Q Z f04 La � 0 /, p /sM+'yx` // "6•_G• O 6 ,'b•-0'• I Y U iy / / s 9r/ I �sE ! L� e LW \r EPA KEY PLAN V 00-0 POSTS - 4x4 POST WE - EPR4ICW IX WG ❑OF4INV�LN� A&`WW STORAGE MBUILDING &' ® 60'634'X.20'20' WALL NGT. RN S RAL B - ERW4 FOGMG -6 W.4W Y y W/ ' aPE00' -T al WIDE MATER[AL OPTIONS m PRESSURE TREATED - .40 POSIS .6O REGINGOp - CONmmfl _N CFIlM - NLWINER 2 CP IDUWAIE: NHYL FENDIH I I I VRML I 107Ts AND I OR EQUAL UATEEL SPRO J a mmRa. Box fqi WFTL = V ERIMNCEM'-G" M9 PRCPf111Y uNE Z GRNE ¢ U Q Z f04 La � 0 /, p /sM+'yx` // "6•_G• O 6 ,'b•-0'• I Y U iy / / s 9r/ I �sE ! L� e LW \r EPA KEY PLAN V 00-0 POSTS - 4x4 POST WE - EPR4ICW IX WG ❑OF4INV�LN� A&`WW STORAGE MBUILDING &' ® 60'634'X.20'20' WALL NGT. RN S RAL B - ERW4 FOGMG -6 W.4W Y y W/ ' aPE00' -T al WIDE MATER[AL OPTIONS m PRESSURE TREATED - .40 POSIS .6O REGINGOp - CONmmfl _N CFIlM - NLWINER 2 CP IDUWAIE: NHYL FENDIH I I I VRML I 107Ts AND I OR EQUAL UATEEL SPRO TOW ¢s"'u un ATo I"L I IXlmxc w¢L ® Ewa xms9 ulaxc E.L1L4 SRFI iUY[ W/ BIXMG610 WICx IFM.E M1 FENCED STORAGE AREA alae 120'x68' 8143 _ SYS.CICl1K + 911.9 o SIGN BIA6— J &"n...gts •.._ .. _ . SWF� Ek61 � � HExn ,u._W, +816.0 6•-0" 25'-0" I WI of i ® GREEN MANAGE I '(/-qp'\�• SIGN ELEVATION V/ IM'_1'-V' BALL BUILDING 10'%10' PARTIAL J a 3 = a 0 20 40 60 2 N O�EDHEART PXOPp$m SPOT EUMUNAS N �J" a ? CSSEM ` 0 3n'• I s 12• 4POST 0 W w K Sm19' ro xN2 suts vN•amL96 ® 2, RECE.4FO SPTR WITS AT SPACE➢ BASES GEIW'FEN T WE. 04. PER lNLGE 4Ydli iJ GUILDS F � LJ rl..f� ¢ 1 CpANIHS RiEPNiED BY ,, IX 'A'AttATA NNWL YN. n' 55391 V Z 1 FENCE ELEVATION FENCE SECTION 3.Z AND FIE1ll INFgIMAiVM PROAGED WY. .1 GREENS. LLC. 3.0 TOW ¢s"'u un ATo I"L I IXlmxc w¢L ® Ewa xms9 ulaxc E.L1L4 SRFI iUY[ W/ BIXMG610 WICx IFM.E M1 FENCED STORAGE AREA alae 120'x68' 8143 _ SYS.CICl1K + 911.9 o SIGN BIA6— J &"n...gts •.._ .. _ . SWF� Ek61 � � HExn ,u._W, +816.0 6•-0" 25'-0" I WI of i ® GREEN MANAGE I '(/-qp'\�• SIGN ELEVATION V/ IM'_1'-V' BALL BUILDING 10'%10' PARTIAL J a 3 = a 0 20 40 60 2 49y-0'• iG PXGP. ME TOW ¢s"'u un ATo I"L I IXlmxc w¢L ® Ewa xms9 ulaxc E.L1L4 SRFI iUY[ W/ BIXMG610 WICx IFM.E M1 FENCED STORAGE AREA alae 120'x68' 8143 _ SYS.CICl1K + 911.9 o SIGN BIA6— J &"n...gts •.._ .. _ . SWF� Ek61 � � HExn ,u._W, +816.0 6•-0" 25'-0" I WI of i ® GREEN MANAGE I '(/-qp'\�• SIGN ELEVATION V/ IM'_1'-V' BALL BUILDING 10'%10' PARTIAL SITE PLAN 0 20 40 60 CC w SCALE IN FEET PXOPp$m SPOT EUMUNAS N +® ? WSIMG SPOt NEIS,. 0 MIES: NCM KU.R RV. XIGX K Sm19' ro xN2 suts vN•amL96 ® 2, RECE.4FO SPTR WITS AT SPACE➢ r e W GEIW'FEN T WE. 04. PER lNLGE 4Ydli W 2 .. SITE DATA TAKEN FROM: n CpANIHS RiEPNiED BY ,, IX 'A'AttATA NNWL YN. n' 55391 05C-1]6-ett0 AND FIE1ll INFgIMAiVM PROAGED WY. .1 GREENS. LLC. c Sap -02-03 02:27P NORB-tKAWELL t - 16550 3mefm arta,. Shekwrc. WN 55979 952445.1309 352445-1490(f:=) ftx C -, 1w Tm Kmv- Npvby� 9529420197 P.01 OW.. 17 e.111( From, Brandi. M&z aw Aloe PA9+n 17 Fax 952-942.0197 F] Aw 0942-03 Reg Peru 6 urgent 0 CoM.vKe U .r.. .� i.•.i . c - G For Review �— Plonse Comment C Please Repty C Plea" Ftecyvlo SOP -02-03 02:27P NORBY/KAWELL_w 9529420197 is r•Citr P_02 -- Bohn Wp/! DHIlinq Co, 16350 Baseline Avenua Shakopee, MN 55379 phone: 952-445-4809 Fax 952-445-2439 Pemdatfm Tests, Sbi/ Sadngs __ ..._ For Prrp IMInary Pfawng CREAM 8 K_ GRrd M. Bah DATF PR8PAR6Q• 0811-a.4 LICENSEV 1043 PREPARED MR- _ SAVW PHONE #: FAX R: SITELOCATIONJ-AfP WT2VNi HOMiFOWNWRS. 77, M! .a. II •.I \Y� f PAGCR A ADDITION: LOT BLOCK comm. C anc • T0WNSNIP: Cha aAw T` _ SSBN R. _ 23W S: 23 Sep -02-03 02:27P NORBY/KAWELL JV • L. LfXIJ 1G--�cn„ p�rn� WLLL LM.1LL 11'N Designed Fcr: X No Typo of System: Rock Trench 9529420197 P.03 septic system sne information X Mound rode bed 1 o, X sand area 50 X Chamber Design Criteria: 0 Number of Bedrooms Grinder or Ejector Pump Proposed tY or N) Replacement Gmvelieas Trench AFGrada Presauriced Treatment tied Alternative, Other, Pertvrmance Y Garbage Disposal (Y M N) Septic Tank: 1000gal 1 Y50gal 1500gal 1500gal (2.c) 2000ga1 two compartment Pump Tork: 1000gal 1250gal i 1500gal 2000g� SOOgaI. system Information araviety Row basement level to Septlp tanks and Pump lank pump upio treament mound General COnstruclioo; Diven all surface water MYtrom the dralnfleld area during constnrction Fence oft the drainfield area before permit application. Site Considerations: math Mh Y or N Miscellaneous Info.• N Is this a preliminary design? (more m be done in future) N Has the 100yr flood plain elevalion level been checked? Ia high water elevation mark needed? N fs Septic in well head protection area? N is Septic near private drainage (tile Imes, ditches, culverts, etc.,.) N Any buried utlftes or water lines in the way N Existing Sepdc tank to pump and inspect? N Difficult tank & dralnfisld equipment accessMnrkabnity? N Is there a wetland Setback conoem? (Sec Below) N Have the property lines been marked? N Do we have a survey? N Is water way eaaments marked? N u here a basement lift pump? N Old septic tanks to a pumped b bury? Y Septic tank truck access avalfable? Y Tress to he removed? Y Well over 1008. deep? N Variance needed? Sep -02-03 02:28P NORBY/KAWELL w. ,�cc.,•� -rcri D\FwcLL ur,1411�T� 9529420197 P.04 --44p. 715-- P.4,17-- _ . Mound Design Worksheet (For flows up to 1200 gpd) Adr 4rgles must be entemd, the reef wm be cakuw9d. Estimated 1000 gpd (see 6grae A•1) or mmured =x 1.5 (aakly faCtor) z 0 gpd B. 8EPPC TANK LIQUID VOLUMES Septic tank capacity 3000 !wo tanks g (we Rgum G1) Bedrooms Capacity Garb. Disp. Oil, and Lift 2 or less 0 1126 1 3or4 1000 1500 2000 Sorb 1500 2250 3000 7.8 or D 2000 Annn Anne C, 601-8 (S$e avaNlaribn dale) 1. Depth to restrdrig tayer- 1.2 feet 2. Depth of percolation testi = 1 Inch" 3. Tefte Loam 4. Sc8 loading rate (see Figure DJ3) 0.6 ppkU h1 perocla00n rats 3145 5. % Land Slope e D. ROCK LAYER DIMEN81ONS 1 Mulapy average design flow (A) by 0.8310 obtain required area of rock layer Item A x 0.83= 1000 gpd x 0.83 fcsgpd = 830 ft: 2. Determine rock layer w dih = 0.83 Ralgpd x linear Loading Rate LR) (see LLR chart) 0.63 ft'lgpd x L 12 10.0 ft LLIt Chu} Park Rate LLR < M 1 a=12 >+120 MPI <46 S Length of rock layer - area dNked by width = 830 ft= 1 10 feet= 83.0 feet E. ROCKVOLUME I. Muttiply rook area by rook depth to gat cubic feet of rock 630 X 1 h • 830 RS 2. Divide f? by 27 elydr to get Cubic yards 630 hr 1 27 s 30.7 ye 3. MWbply Gd>jC yards by 1.4 to gat weight of rock in ons; 30.7 yd° X 14 toNyds = 43.0 tons F. A8SORPTION WIDTH 1. Absorption Width equals absnry On ratio (30e Num 0.33) times rock layer wtdtn 2 4 x 10.0 ft 24.0 h Pape 1 of 8 Sep -02-03 02:28P NORBY/KAWELL .+�ti-LtJ•JJ aL•YJf i savm� WDLL VR 1LLa�V 9529420197 P.05 G. MOUND SLOPE WIDTH & LENGTH (Greater than 1%) 1. Downslope absorpton width a absorption width minus rook layer width 24 `feet 10 _ feet= 14 feet 2, Call mound sae UP8LOPE a. Determine depth of dean sand at upsiope edge of rook Isyer t 3 hat minus distance to restricting layer(Ct ) 3 R 1.2 ft' 1.8 Feel b. Mound height at the upalOpe edge Of rod* layer t depth of dean sand for separation (02a) at up3 ope edge plus depth of root layer (11001) to deplh of cover (1 foot) 1.8ft+1ft41ft= 3.8 feet C. Upstope berm multiplier based On land slope (see figure A-34) Soled berm mullilA 3,23 d, Upalope width = berm multiplier(G20 times upslope mound helght(G2b) 3.23 x 3.8 It : 12.3 feel DOWNSLOPE e. Drop in elevation = rock layer width (D2) iimss pefoent landshopepp 100 10 R x 8 % l 100 = 0.6 het f. Downslope mound height = depth Of dean sand for slope difference (02e) at downslope rock edge plus me mound height at the upslope edge of rock layer 12b 060 R + 3.8 R = 4.4 fast 9, Downslope berm multiplier based on percent And slope (see Figure D•34) S,d6 h. Downslope width • downalope mul6pler(G2g) times downslope mound heighl(G2f) 4A x 5.26 = 23.1 feet I Select greater of GI and 02h as bre downslope width use 27.5 feet j. Total mound width Is the sum of upslope (02d) width plus rock layer width (02) plus downsWps width (G2i) 12,3 ft + 10.0 R+ 27.5 A2 49.7 feet k. Total mound length is the sum of upslope width MCI) plus root layer length (D3) plus upsiope 0.4th (02d) 12.3 R + 83 ft + 12.3 R= 108 feet Final dimensions (slope ai ) 60 ft x 108 ft 1 hereby ortfy that I have Completed this work in so:ordande with all applicable ordtnancea, rules end laws (signature) 1043 (iicense 0) Page 2 of 5 Sep -02-03 02:28P NORBY/KAWELL 9529420197 P.06 JLC. c. cDNJJ it^Ix•1'i Wtw� wt1L UC1LLalb------�IIJ.(5,---P.Pd7. „.,__ Groes Section Diagram Landslope > I% slope .;Fctc:.zicsc.IBMI S 6Topiai1 9 ted / /� 1..z NW �P�iol� dthcC�y Am:xr+sati�tnar i oon�vloyetl�.tt�taii `� rtaw Lar+acnu=c, io a e OUL S lengm 6 width ere for sand base dimensions Page 5 of a rue1of1 Sep -02-03 02:28P NORBY I<AWELL w... PUMP SELECTION PROCEDURE All bated rent"&$ must be entered, the rest unit be calculated. 1. DetwiNne pump capacoy,. A. OWly Dietrabution 1. Minimum naW W dscNwp is 10 ppm 2 Mal MUM Suggested diarhmp is 45 mm For other estabaiaammts at least 10% paster then the wea=r wpgY rate, but no faster than the rate at which elfiu" N111 flow, out of the ds(rieution dWoe. B. Ptaaaun 01e4@ution - see p"Wre deelpn Wakaheai 801e0hd Pump Capacity 25.2 ppm 2. Determine head requirements: A. Elevation difference between pump and point of dischaV. 12 fat 9529420197 P-07 I.J. r iJ-- •-^ . [1.' 3. -- B. Sliecial need requm m v ($#a hyun - Speaal Had HagWrements) E =fw C. Ffiction loss 1, Select pipe diameter 7-2-lln 2. Enter F" E-9 with 9pm (1A or B) and pipe diameter (C1) Read friction loss in feat t00 feettrom Figure E -B Friction las■ 1.11 N 100 it of Ops 3. Determine total pipe length from pump ryectarpe to sal system discharge poir;L Estimate by adding Z5 percent to pipe length for fi*Q hue. E t pipe 16%th times 1.25 = total pipe length f 5 ftx1.25. 218.75 W 4. Calculate total hicW IONS DY multiplying fnclton tae (C2) by the equWant pipe ImP (q) and dvxle by 100, FL= 0.73 1V100ft X 218.75 N 1 100 1,8 feet D. Total head requirement is the sum of aleuron diffenxroe (A), special head requirements (B), and toW friction ims (C4). 12 it + 5 it + f.8 it 2 Total Head: 16.6 feet at least 18.5 fat ef ppm lopecial Mildm OMAN 'Wablrtim Oft Pleasure Distribution 5h B -e Friction Loss in Plastic Pipe per 100 It nom nal Flow Rate pipe dameter gpm 1.6' 20 2.47 0.73 0.11 25 3.73 1.11 0.16 30 6.23 1.55 0.23 35 8.88 2.08 0.9 40 8.91 2.84 0.99 46 11,07 3.28 0.48 50 13.48 3.29 0.58 555 4.78 0.7 5D 5,8 0.82 65 5.48 0.95 70 7.44 1.09 I he4by cer8fy that I have OmPleted 5ns work in accordance with all appiicabie ordnencas, tuna and laws. (signature) 1043 (11con88 0) Pace 1 of 1 SQP-02-03 `02:29P NORBY/KAWELL�LL�w OWING CHAMBER SIZING Aw 6mree r.danpn mud h an/ppd, rhe rod Ww ee aa4uh'ed 9529420197N. y J _ _ J P.08 1. Oetennfno Gree A R@d"lmv=.Lxw R z - 0 r?B. Clrchaea � 3,14 z radws 3.14 C. GOI e!f fmm mmufadure c2lb"s Dow$ per AM TRa6 m 7.5 gagom as w6i0 W d sdeme #Won mtwipy Ba ares (1A B a C) times Ra="mm Im ane 4+Ade by 12 inow FFW to ca M* palm per hro. 13urfap 4140x76l 12 0 1` x 7.5 t 1" = 85,0 994an per ire 2. 3 C"ian lspl Bank saline A Oep@RomnaeanalnMp"taunktgaan = 47 m B Total pnz wNne ° oeptR ham Bdtdn a! BO+d pipe h uak 5dtan(3A) x gs'Fn� • 43 in x 36.0 geUn - 15pS.0 ps0ans 4. craaeta pelmabmer pumpR�23 u01ros 0faraer caxnh9 PwnD) PYN and woo heam •2 im0lµ7 x eelo per" ( 16 20) s 36.0 7eun . 610.0 Brum S CsNznehtugdpurrtosAvaams A_ S9lecl pump else far/d 00Bee Der .Calm dow.Bpd fees FFjxeA•iJleas pee tlar: ®aPd I S dOoewmy ' tM goads A.I b4al ed SWW FIM 1n OPO Rude Bediaara6 pan 1 Clasf II Clap m Casa N tJquiO p.f la0t50.9780,11001700.2600.380 825 103 6 5 3 410 300 218 0e 4 600 375 258 AM 5 tss 45p 1 2p4 pis 6 900 525 1 733 :bta 1. 7 1050 600 3:0 II a II 8 1200 1 575 408 :dumro B. Crwiah arsnfi7ak 1%=�R02 �j15 175.0 R 2. Ce*r4m liquid eaame of pipe. 0.17 gobfl (ase Ague E -m 3. 0raio6ed4W11oyx t7j.0 I )x 0.17 gBMS02)- G Tdel pump a4 edmne= apspvd0*SAj-6Wl;ep(5B3) W ift 1 Lmp7A ~ gBdYa Legal Ttmk: so gallas or 100% the dally flow or ANemallm Pumps ulple N P" tJquiO p.f la0t50.9780,11001700.2600.380 T 4 0.660 ISE 010m • 29.8 galea = 155.8 gal 8. owwao Rost awala60n dal/xar(uslnp 8X87 pumpmt Vaunle) Toul pOnpa41 m7luma(50)7 gaMlM(2) 155.8 gal I 35.0 gBYn = 8.6 nQi 7. Caalla \dame kellarta {yplaafiw 2 • S nchea7 Nam d90 Mc^) a pakmp hR • �in x 10.3 gal 55.0 DOM - 70 _ pa 8. 041e40 to ga bn =gam i; 6verpmmv(4).6aft. amgtaut;5C) • pallarr 1"71 630.0 fid . 166,1 gd . 70.0 pr = a66.a 9. Tolyl kekdeah0 klll pXlaa(I)IpedoMn(2) 635.1 peama I 35 a•lrm • b.6 A dm !tl CakOhh reamaeepesitY (Y6% b dq daily Aml Deily 11m x 0.7$ = 830 x0.26 • 6225 oedws hreW 46f1' Out nae mnpl l s anax 0 90ardanw a1M 86 app0cile OnSnenC1.8, ma aW u -189mb-) Omawe a) page 1 of 1 Sop -02-03 02:29P NORE�X,!AV�ELL 9529420197 P.09 Bohn We Drilling Co. 16550 Basefine Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 17 952-445-4809 Gary M. Bohn Lid. #10 Da e: -T- If L_j. L---- -- T Sep -02-03 02:29P NORBY/KAWELL 9529420197 P.10 Soil Boring Log Date; - . c �ect ac 'dn: c6.,,, tie rr� / �.• L�.�ta Twp Client' Address: SOHngs madqA & y: J u N alms up lil6. I Q"" — Surface Elevation Sail type at system depth: tray iop .2,r� 10 2 ... Blocky platy Prisntetic None Slope: % End of boring at —7— feet, Standing water table: yes no Present at feet of depth, hours after boring, Mottled sail; Observed at feet of depth. baring -hole Not present in Observations and comments; Surface Elevation' Soil type at system depth: structure: , siocky Platy Prismatic None Slope: End of boring at feet - Standing water table: yes no Present at feet of depth, hours after boring. Mottled svii: Observbd at _ feet of depth. /off Not present in boring hole 1 Observations and comments: Sep -02-03 02:29P NORBY/KAWELL 9529420197 P-11 Soil Boring Log Date:-- - v Client Tw Address: Borings mad"y: C-tA�� .u. ►mit u akr a.... 10,45 — Borin method: A,,erPtt Probe other8 �- Boring Number 0110 Classi}icatlon s stem: Munsell 01 er Surface Elevation 8odng Number Soil type at system depth: 111HSurface Elevation Soil type at system depth: Depth Texture t .� G/ay /o•r... tructure; Blocky Platy Prismatic None Slope: % End of boring at feet. Standing water table; yes no Present at feet of depth, hours after boring. Mottled soil: Observed at - .J. feet of depth. Not present in boring hole r Observations and comments: up" /oaaM /ram -_-___,_ 44 ;Pr..� Blocky Plaly Slope: 96 End of boring at feet. Standing water table: ye$ no Present at feet of depth, hours after boring. Motued soil; Observed at _ feet of depth. Av Not present In boring hole Observations and comments: Af None Sep -02-03 `02:30P NORBY/!KAWELL 9529420197 P.12 -- --- Soil Boring Log Date:__ Address: Surface Elevation Soil type at system depth: oiructure: Blooky Maty PrIsmetiC Nona slope: 9b End of boring at feet. Standing water table: yes no Present at feet of depth, hours after boring. Mottled soil: Observed at. 2��1 feet of depth. /py/`� Not present in boring hole Observations and comments: uc. Surface Elavatlon' S011 type at system depth. 1 .. I la4"o, l/�w .. .2.s ;kl 7 -- Structure:. Blooky Plely PAsmatlo Non* slope: % End of boring at . 2 feet. Standing water table: yes no Present at feet of depth, hours after boring, Mottled soil: Observed at feet of depth. /0y✓ Not present in boring hole Observations and commen'ts'- 0 Sap -02-03 02:30P NORBY�KAWELL 9529420197 P.13 IN. I1, -f-. 1J-41 .• - --- Company Noma Bohn well Dolling Company License A: 1013 P►MUMon Tut Performed By, Gary Bohn Tested For: Ron $mar Test 14016 LoUflan: Chani Galt course Test Kole k p -1 Method of ecratching sidewall: 2 x 2 w.h reeds Depth at bottom of hole 12 mamas oetepreeoakstarted 72820D3 Depth of Initlaf water fll6ng: 10" above hole bMm Method asad to matntsin f4" of water depth In hole fort hours Data Pere reeding conducled: 7!40/03 Maxlmum depth above halt bottom during test 5 nches Diameter of Hole 6 inches Depth of gravel at betmm: 2 Inches Stared at: 11:15 AM Zito fill Starting at: 9:30 AM 9:40 Ztl - 5 ills .. 0.60 -, .. 68.7 _ _ • fliri.. — . . 10;pt1 20 t f- ---- 5 7118 -- - S - 0.66 -- .._._.__.� 3s.7 B iti 10:20 40 Perco Adan Rata t 357 minutes pet mch 7/31/2003 8:27 PM 1 SOP -02-03 02:30P NORBY/KAWELL_�� 9529420197..,..._ P.14 _- Company Name Barn LYeN D'lIthg Ow LkenaB M: 1043 ParaWallon Test Pedomled BY; Gary Bohn rested For. Ran Saam Test Hole Location! Chanhassen Golf Course Tom Role 0: P-2 Diameter of Hae t 'Wei Method of scratching afdeMall: 2 c 2 vdh nail; Depth at bow at hole t2 inches Data presoak started 7I2gr2003 Depth of inlual water filling. 10" above vole bottom Method used to maintain 12" of wdar depth In hole for 4 ho,n Data pert reading cohduet ml 7"2g 09 Maximum depth above hole bottom during test Depth of gravel at bottom: 2 Inches Stand at: 1115 AM auto fill Starting at: 9:90 AM a riches Mxnrtae Inonea If1CneE Yr1fnU16Pe'Ingh 6 0.76 .. _ �.7 ......... .... _lin. .. _.. 0 s t4 D76 21.7 .. .. 9 Percolation Rate = 2V mim tp per inch 7/31/2003 8:29 PM I Sep -02-03 02:31P NORE.,Y KAWEL_.L._ �. ,. .1.....`_ �_..,. 9529420197 -, P.15 Company Name Bohr Waa DnFln_RCpmpeny * �� Peteoladon Test Pertormed 4: Tested For: Ron Seatxer Teet Hele Loeftoo; Channnwn WCaurn Teti Hole e: P-3 Diameter of Hole g Irrrnet Method of Scratching aldewilk 2 x 2 wfh nark Dopth at bottom of hole ty irdlea Date presoak started Tr26(2009 Depth of Initlaf water filling! 1D' above hole bottom Method used to maintain 72' of voter depth in hole for 6 hours Dale pore reading canduetad: 7rpro3 Meuimum depth above We bottom during tett Depth of gravel at bottom: 2 Wes stared at 11:I56fi auiu 9W Sig ling at: 9,30 AM 0 inches Form latlar Rate- 3:.7 minutespa" 7/31/2003 827 PM Ml10" non08 nS#f)B MlnutfuMeh 9:20 g BAO 20 S 7118.... .. C ... _ 36.7 102 111 s me 0.68 36.7 Bn. 10:10 io -S 7118 08 .... _.vk__ .._.._.. Form latlar Rate- 3:.7 minutespa" 7/31/2003 827 PM Fertilizers for Greens 53,000 Date Company Name # of units 4/5/2006 Specialty 21-0-0-24 5000 lbs. 4 4/13/2006 Renaissance 8-2-6- 4.75 Verdicon 4/19/2006 Specialty PGR 1.25 Gypsom 4/19/2006 Specialty ProQuench Eximo 2.5 4/24/2006 Specialty 17-9-7- 68 3 4/27/2006 Specialty PGR 1.25 4/27/2006 Specialty ProQuench 5 5/2/2006 Verdicon 0-0-50- 4.5 5/5/2006 Specialty 17-9-7- 3.5 5/7/2006 Verdicon Allieviate 2.5 5/22/2006 Verdicon Eximo 25oz 5/30/2006 Verdicon Eximo 25oz 5/30/2006 Turf Supply Aquaduct 2.5 6/1/2006 Turf Supply Eagle 48 oz. 6/1/2006 Turf Supply Pegasus 150oz 6/1/2006 Turf Supply Aquaduct 2.5 6/5/2006 Specialty 17-9-7- 2.75 6/13/2006 Specialty 17-9-7- 2 6/21/2006 Verdicon 0-0-50- 4.5 7/5/2006 Halla Insecticide 1101bs 7/6/2006 Specialty 17-9-7- 2.5 8/3/2006 Verdicon 10-18-22- 3.5 8/18/2006 Turf Supply Eagle 48 oz. 8/18/2006 Turf Supply Pegasus 150 oz. 8/28/2006 Specialty ProQuench 5 gal 8/28/2006 Nutriculture 25-15-10- 25lbs 8/28/2006 Plantex 15-15-18 25lbs 9/22/2006 Specialty 17-9-7 2.5 11/6/2006 Verdicon 10-18-22 200lbs 11/6/2006 Specialty 3-4-5- 250lbs 11/20/2006 Specialty Quali-pro 320oz 11/20/2006 IprodionePro 320oz 11/20/2006 Reinders Par -Flo 640oz Fertilizers for Tees and Fairways and Range Date Company Name # of units 4/4/2006 Belle Plaine 21-0-0-24 5000 lbs. 4/14/2006 Specialty 8-12-6- 113 5/16/2006 Verdicon Eximo 144oz 5/17/2006 Specialty Gypsom 25 ton 6/1/2006 Verdicon Eximo 144oz 6/15/2006 Specialty 17-9-7- 68 6/22/2006 Specialty Trimec Plus 1200 oz 7/24/2006 Verdicon 12-28-12- 110 7/24/2006 Specialty 17-9-7- 11 8/29/2006 tees only Specialty 8-12-6- 3 9/28/2006 Verdicon 24-5-40 71 10/30/2006 Specialty 8-16-6 126 11/3/2006 Specialty Gypsom 6 ton 12/16/2006 Specialty Prodiamine 30lbs Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record t N Category Iw Turf and Omamentals-Pesficede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address Halla Greens 1495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone pax 952-252-2525 952445-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction Y - z Tolal Product Used Location of Application Site Fertilizers Annlied Brand Name Rate % N %P % K - Area Treated Tolal Product Used 5 r.I C -t Applicators Name Applicators License Number c Applicators Signature Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature i Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record, Category E. Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicator's Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952-445-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction % K Area Treated ��-A Location of Application Site C Irttn> Fertilizers ADolied Treated Brand Name Rate % N %P % K Area Treated Total Product Used M" Applicators Name Applicator's License Number Applicators Signature Applicators Name Applicator's License Number Applicator's Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Omamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952-445-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperraamre Wind Speed/Direction % K I 4v� J 6.t - t,� lC - l � Location of Application Site Pesticides Applied Brand Name EPA Reg No. Dosage Used Units Treated Total Product Used Fertilizers Applied Bmnd Name Rate % N %P % K I Area Treated Total Product Used „t< t Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Applicators Name Applicators License Number - Applicators Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record s Category E, Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicator's Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952445-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction y - IN L Area Treated Total Product Used - �: Location of Application Site No. Fertilizers Aoulied Brand Name Rate % N %P % K I Area Treated Total Product Used - �: i [�a Applicators Name ApplicatoesLicense 'Numher )033 ntILLLS Applicators Signature It d Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952445-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction % K Area Treated Total Product Used Location of Application Site Pesticides Applied Brand Name EPA RegNo. Dosage Used Units Treated Total Product Used Fertilizers Applied Brand Naapm, a Rate % N %P % K Area Treated Total Product Used CIL Applicators Name Applicator's License Number t L l 5 Applicators Signature JIIte, V7 , iU Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature g{6 Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record k Category B, Turf and Omamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952-445-6557 Date of Application Time of Applicanton Temperature Wind Speed/Direction % K �I-►L i z -1; Area Treated �) -r0 N Location of Application Site �i%ISS No. Fertilizers Aoolied Brand Name Rate % N %P % K Area Treated Total Product Used - L 'o Lf .,_ I C _ CL6 1 ' w� Applicators Name Applicators License Number 00 Applicators Signature Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Omamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952445-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Speed/Direction % K Area Treated (Wind Location of Application Site Pesticides Annlied Brand Name EPA Reg No. Dosage Used Units Treated Total Product Used Fertilizers Applied Brand Name Rate % N %P % K Area Treated Used '✓ li �c. �ti� FTota]Pmdwt Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature _ Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record y Category E, Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicator's Address Halla Greens 1495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952-445-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction 5- 2 vo. C- t^tv� t �4v` culn� Location of Application Site Pesticides Applied Brand Name EPA ReR No. Dosage Used Units Treated Total Product Used Fertilizers Annlied Brand Name Rate % N %P % K Area Treated Total Product Used - AppBcators Name Applicators License Number )L%) 3 Ct ZU,� Applicators Signature {r�r ` � Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Faz 952-252-2525 952-045 6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction % K Area Treated TdaI Product Used Location of Application Site *Ae,) -)acl : hZh-N1 Pesticides Applied Brand Name EPA Reg No. Dosage Used Units Treated Total Product Used Fertilizers Anolied Brand Name Rate % N %P % K Area Treated TdaI Product Used rY LL Le, 6 16 Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record i Category E, Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address - Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952445-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction % K-'1 55r Location of Application Site 6��1� Pesticides Applied Brand Name EPA Reg No. Dosage Used Units Treated Total Product Used Fertilizers ADolied Brand Name Rate % N %P % K-'1 Area Treated Total Product Used - Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicator's Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record ; Category E, Turf and Omamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicator's Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952445-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction -0(-, lz -/ (00C 6" if ` Location of Application Site Pesticides Aoolied B nd Name EPA Reg No. usage Used Units Treated Total Product Used C, %P (10 txWJ jY Deo V-7 l Total Product Used Fertilizers Aoolied Brand Name Rate % N %P % K Area Treated Total Product Used Applicators Name Applicator's License Number Applicator's Signature Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record j Category E, Turf and Omamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952445-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction % K Area Treated Total Product Used Locaat1tionfn� of Application Site `JAL is G, tI J-L,rytc�r Pesticides Anolied Brand Name EPA Reg No. Dosage Used Units Treated Total Product Used % N %P % K Area Treated Total Product Used Fertilizers Applied Brand Name Rate % N %P % K Area Treated Total Product Used Applicators Name Applicators License Number uj Applicator's Signature Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicator's Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction Location of Application Site r Pesticides Applied Brand Name EPA Reg No. Dosage Used Units Treated Total Product Used F,"ili,,, AnnIird Bmnd Name IRate I°,6 N %P '% K Area Treated To[al Produc[ Used - Applicators Name Applicatoes License Number `A Applicators Signature Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature t Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Omamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952445-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction � Y. ' Z �i Total Product Used Location of Application Site —� �{t rL✓ V—c,sl1 Pesticides Anolied Brand Name EPA Reg No. Dosage Used Units Treated "rotat Product Used t v✓ % N ii I�l � Y. ' Z Area Treated Total Product Used Fertilizers Anolied Brand Name IRate % N %P % K Area Treated Total Product Used Applicators Name Applicators license Number �lz Applicators Signature Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Omamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952-445-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction C. - =] Location of Appliatioo Site r Pestiridre Annl ird LL Brand Name EPA Reg No. Dosage Used Units Treated j7potal Product Used Rale % N %P C. - Fertilizers Aoolied Brand Name Rale % N %P RApplicMatore'sSignature Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicator's Signature �A Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Omamentals-Peslicede and Fertilizer Application Date of Application Rate Time of Application %P Temperature Wind Speed/Direction Area Treated Total Product Used - Location of Application Site 4e ; C, (-i,1 Name Fertilizers Annlicd Brand Name Rate % N %P % K Area Treated Total Product Used - Applicators Name Applicator's License Number Applicators Signature Applicators Name Applicator's License Number Applicatoes Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicator's Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952445-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction 3 t: G Area Treated Total Product Used - ,Location of Application Site Cif f C l,ti ) Pesticides Mulled Brand Name EPA Reg No. Dosage Used Units Treated Total Product Used % N %P % K Area Treated Total Product Used - Fertilizers Aoolied Bmnd Name IRate % N %P % K Area Treated Total Product Used - Applicators Name Applicator's License Number `U -D Applicator's Signature z- Applicators Name Applicator's License Number Applicators Signature Pesticide and Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952-445-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction %K - 45 Total Product Used Location of Application Site Pesticides Applied Brand Name EPA Reg No. Dosage Used Units Treated Total Product Used t -.t ,V, L: %P %K - 45 Total Product Used Fertili7p.m Annlied Brand Name Rate %N %P %K - Area Treated Total Product Used Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Ornamentals-Peslicede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicator's Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952445-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction In-I-C,>(l Area Treated Total Product Used - Location of Application Site 0 k, i � iL yz Pesticides Annlied Brand Name EPA Reg No. Dosage Used Units Treated Tota Product Used %N %P % K Area Treated Total Product Used - Fertilizers Applied Brand Name Rate %N %P % K Area Treated Total Product Used - Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Pesticide Categoq Applicat Halla Telepho 952-252 Date of J Lneat101 brand Name Rate % N '7oP % K -Area Treated To[al Product Used Applicators Name Applicator's License Number Applicator's Signature Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Nam Applicator's Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952445-6557 Date of AppGcalion Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction � - C, Q I - Z f", K,5` �> Location of Application Site L) /-,e e 7 Pesticides Applied Brand Name EPA Reg No. Dosage Used Units Treated Total Product Used Fertilizers Annlied Brand Name Rate % N %P % K Area Treated ITotal Product Used CtYr Applicators Name Applicator's License Number Applicator's Signature Applicators Name Applicator's License Number - Applicator's Signature Pesticide and' Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952.445-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction '90 K `sty. NtL) Location of Application Site -TLe t �C:a.. t— l -t.� Pesticides Applied Brand Name EPA Reg No. Dosage Used Units Treated Total Product Used % N %P '90 K `sty. Total Product Used Fertilizers Applied Brand Name Rate % N %P '90 K Area Treated Total Product Used Applicators Name Applicator's License Number Applicatoes Signature Applicators Name Applicators License Number - Applicator's Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category G, Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 9521145-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction % K i\�....; RAO (ii"L `�• & t��.�✓r16ti' r n f�0(:" Location of Application Site Rate % N %oP % K i\�....; RAO (ii"L `�• & t��.�✓r16ti' r n f�0(:" r/ @11.'•�,t(I -f r ky)�L I lit Used Fertilizers Applied Brand Name Rate % N %oP % K Area Treated Total Product Used Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicator's Signature Applicators Name AppBcator's License Number - Applicators Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Omamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 'Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952-445-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction % K ArcaTreated ITotal Product Used - Location of Application Site Pesticides Applied Brand Name EPA Reg No. Dosage Used Units Treated Total Product Used Fertilizers Applied Brand Name Rate % N %P % K ArcaTreated ITotal Product Used - Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Omamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952445-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction tt Area Treated Total Product Used Location of Application Site i Hue - Pesticides Applied Brand Name EPA Reg No. Dosage Used Units Treated Total Product Used Fertilizers Applied Brand Name Rate % N %P %a K I Area Treated Total Product Used Applicators Name Applicator's License Number Applicators Signature Applicators Name Applicator's License Number Applicators Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952445-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speeed�/D'irection( % K �LI -i LI Area Treated ?-�`� "J/ Location of Applicatiao Site UitrLL 0') Pesticides Applied Band Name EPA Reg No. Dosage Used Units Treated Total Pre -duct Used Fertilizers Applied Brand Name Rate % N %P % K Area Treated Total Product Used Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Date of Application Time of Application % N Temperature Wind Speed/Direction Lp-2ZuLu� Arca Treated ITotal Product Used Location of Application Site Pesticide< Annlird Brand Name EPA ReR No. Dosage Used Units Treated Total Product Used % N %P % K Arca Treated ITotal Product Used Frrtilivrrt Annlird Brand Name IRatc % N %P % K Arca Treated ITotal Product Used Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicator's Signature Applicators Name Applicator's License Number Applicators Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Applieadon Record Category E, Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicator's Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952445-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction % K I jAma Treated Total Product Used Location of Application Site I - S lzc,�(s �- 5 Pesticides Auolied Brand Name EPA Reg No. Dosage Used Units Treated ITotal Product Used % N %P % K I jAma Treated Total Product Used (" C Fertilizers AnOlicd Brand Name Rate % N %P % K I jAma Treated Total Product Used Applicators Name Applicator's License Number Applicator's Signature Applicators Name Applicator's License Number Applicator's Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952445-6557 Dale of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction I �.� t; L�• 1. . Location of Application Site Pesticides Applied Brand Name EPA ReR No. Dosage Used Units Treated Total Product Used % N �>>Z �i� y.SGi� I �.� t; L�• 1. . Fertilizers Applied Brand Name iRate % N %P % K Area Treated Total Product Used Applicators Name Applicators License Number s(I Z c c� Applicators Signature 14 1 4, all, I Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Omamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952-445-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction — lJ l: Area Treated Total Product Used - Location of Application Site Pesticides Applied Brand Name EPA Reg No. Dosage Used Units Treated Total Pralucl Used Ferlili7ers Annlied brand Name I Rate %N %p % K Area Treated Total Product Used - 3 Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Applicators Name Applicator's License Number Applicators Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952145-6557 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Spec"irection 7 -2y -GG, qD qC Total Product Used Location of Application Site I<e E (,'WCC EPA Fertilizers Applied Brand Name Rate % N %P % K I Area Treated Total Product Used Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Applicators Name Applicator's License Number Applicators Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category G, Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction -7- c] a\ Location of Application Site L! c C Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category K Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Date of Application Time of Application Temperalme Wind Speed/Disction L , Location of Application Site t tl L � Pesticides Annlicd Brad Name GPA Reg No. Dosage Used Units Treated Total Product Used r � Fertilizers Annlied Brand Name Rate %N %P %#Applicatoes ted Total Product Used Applicators Name Applicator's License Number e Applicators Name Applicators License Number re Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category B. Turf and Ornamentals -Pesticide and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicator's Address Halla Greens 1495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 952-445-6557 ate of Application Time of Application Te mperature Wind Speed/Dinection U _ r 3 P1,\ -, ;� �; -�0 IV u Location of Application Site C1r , f Applicators Name ApplcatoesLkeoseNumber ApplicatorsSignaWm Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category F- Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction C. Location of Application Site Fertilizers Annlied Rmnd Name lRate `Yo N %P % K jAreaTreated Total Product Used N ,P Applicators Name Applicator's License Number Applicators Signature Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category F, Turf and Omamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Time of Application Applicator's Address Halla Greens `j Z L 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 1952445-6557 Telephone Fax 952-252-2525 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature WindSpeedMirection `j Z L V — Z i I t y� Location of Application Site C1 ,c 16\17 7-7:= venmzers Appueu Brand Name Rate % N %P % K I Area Treated Total Product Used // Name jApphcatoes License Number jApplicatoes Signature Name I Applicator's License Number jApplicatoes Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record -` Category 1; Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature wma bpeeavuecuon -.z �- 0, L5 , C( lPISg -.� Fertilizers Applied Brand Name Rate % N r%P %o =Signat�ure sed Applicators Name Apppll cators License Number Applicators Name cators License NumberApplicators Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category 1~ Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address I Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen MN 55317 (Location of Application Site - I _;ii( y ') k-, � i Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category I~ Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Greens 1495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 DateI of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction Iv -IZ Location of Application Site Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category G Turf and Ornamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction t Location of Application Site Fertilizers Apnlied ❑rand Name I Rate % N '%P %o K Area Treated Total Product Used Applicators Name Applicatoes License Number Applicator's, Signature 't "LA5 Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicator's Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Omamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application rators Name Applicators Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record Category E, Turf and Omamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicator's Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction Location of Application Site Fertilizers Anolied Brand Name VApplicaioes °%P % K � Area Treated Total Product Used Applicators Namese Number Applicaloess Signature _(LSApplicators Namense Number Applicator's Signatm Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record -� Category F, Turf and Omamentals-Pesticede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicator's Address Halla Greens 1495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 )ate of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction ,ocation of Application Site 1)^,�;,v1j �iitx�a 0 Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record 4 Category L', Turf and Omamentals-Pestcede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicator's Address I Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Date of Application Time of Application Temperature Wind Speed/Direction _ocation of Application Site Cc c t�S I IrrjJ 4I-'1'1 �ct<i�- � � I l._ � i�.i Ire, Fertilizers Annlied Brand Name Rate % N '%P 1 91. K Area Treated Total Product Used [Applicators plicators Name ApplicaEors Licease Number Applicatoes/Signature �t1 �t�21�S lf�/�,,ttr�1 � Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature Pesticide anf Fertilizer Application Record 1 Category E, Turf and Ornamentals-Pestcede and Fertilizer Application Applicators Name Applicators Address Halla Greens 495 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Date of Application TimeofApplication Temperature lWindSpeed/Direction �, 1. ,��<n�.-.� �L'•�� Location of Application Site 6':, 1 7 l� , i \ i Pesticides Applied Rmnd Name EPA Reg No- Dosage Used Units Treated ITotal Product Used Fertilizers Applied [Brand Name Ipate %N %P % K I -Area Treated Total Product Used Applicators Name Applicator's License Number Applicators Signature Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature t 11 1 E, Fertilizers Applied [Brand Name Ipate %N %P % K I -Area Treated Total Product Used Applicators Name Applicator's License Number Applicators Signature Applicators Name Applicators License Number Applicators Signature I r ■ > s s a s 2 1 ■ 0Mobile t 1 l: c 9 9 ■ ■■ ■ i ■ S Fg A A rYIWI CIYO IYR-1Ro ICo Mwi YNm-RR ow o .w -WSDRRD FID♦M. AIN2TT. VICINITY MAP PROJECT DATA NiEAXXI IF.NE SPACE El(iF]OOR r.cr SPACE 13 R X u R • 6 P.N^n ANFA' Ot ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ® zowW mmc ■ 1 yZ! �� 1RrA 1 Im..i n rnwrcw. * 3` rnWSE 6 eEPOH wJa Pol f¢! BASlS a BFAR■IQ i-YDBLE 511E AIPo°3 IDDDS GREAT Pwra mw. fJM4W.SW4 W - wTr Dr nwsY. GENERAL NOTES SCOPE OF SUPPLY PROJECT TEAM IAi1tU3E IAucrtuoe iJ-u'-2T.A• 1. 11E CONIPILIOR SNYL SUPF]Nai NO OPECf ML i'DRA 11 CONMILIOR SIY11 NOISY TIE dC■Ffll i OEEI15 NE •THE FI%1LMiD VBIE °F1NFAi6 iM RESPON4Bl111S DF DiiEAEM PM16 M9LVED N MlilflN° T16 PNPIFLT. 16pZ TOS iESI SYOl Alw ATIFMIDL K SIMl1 8E SLLEY COILSOERkD LF60U10, UISME NOf MATIXPNOOF, DR NOT 'THE SIZE �f1C SLOPE Of WqN WLL PRECEDE NK D6L%➢NlJS ilYI11D pl 116 SCOPE Of SIIPRY. EPBD!&1QDimLFB Sldai7TJR 1S •SlIE♦�'e P® yrylylYuptY RE9glJs0E FOR /11 CDbIwLTDN YEAIS. TIETIIOGS. WRIIIN CIAi1NYRf 1MDE PPACIKL i MORK 6 PEAFDIIYED, T-Y0� _ 1ECINDq PROEEgMES MO SEQUENCES its CDMdINTNO R WRL BE ASSUYIED TNT 1)EIE 6 W OBJECRN ro 1HE C/0 VdCESIREAY WNDFSS CORP. DETML DEIAis ME xRrom T° stow THE wD REsar a X RAW LAND SITE CO -LOCATION SITE unm sE Seu STREET im P oDrn= aEsaai 2 TIE COrTRILTOR 9Wi1 NSR TIE JR SIE ro REVEM TIE � 11E�laC� TDOFIU•IIOI6 WY BE INLWOFD AS PAi(f sy Et1■r090D n NSIAIIID A TTFY illwlimm M NSTALIID N °�� W" iB00i stwE of rpN AIO EwSf■F JR saE C0IpT1016 NDId10, Blit ror l■ilE3 ro YEDYAUy DEnwea fa EIOSIM: F1EVAlDIE Arlo TOGTIONS ro R Jaum sial BE Twex r -YORE mNIRrc1Da ars PlARO1N >-WRE COIIIRILIOR F.o+.cur Nvrzs S:RNLE Ara OJETNL COOnoilATl01a NIifIFD BY 1IE CONIPILisi BESdtE CCR6IRIICIpIt i Brs PIATiIYEI T-YO®F WMPMIpf 8R PWw101 igMVW WMWi°IDR CONIRACIdI � wrxa rl rnrvr.� �m 1 lIE LUDRACidi ANLL N]sY ALL EY61N0 CDOrtD16 TEY OILER iimll laatE 5110•N OII TE PIARS lIE OD! INIA %CEL FNERI.Y m< Arp oNEEmor¢ PPoDR ro 519inNO 16 ®. NN � SIMLL NOSY THE ENG■IDI SUDI TINT la�v1 ! B15 PUOFOwI FDVOIIGN LSITTRAOTOR 1YNSILIpt IIIC (POw](ADW) T -YORE FAIIrR/LtDR 1CKXATMNS CAN BE YApE BEFORE PROCEFD■C wml ii01 YOHNPK TUL 06CAFPNICFS, DLNITJLT$ OR DILS90N1 EIa SHLLL BE TRC (PDWDI/RDA) T�IORE CgTIRILIOR ®11 GBND T-YDRE AHEI0ITMION FDiiA W SSi.Y REPORrtn ro IIF EMfJ1FER BETUE PROCDD■L NIII 11E ionic BBU GBNEf T-WRE ilIE11DIf"TOrI B15 CN■Et5 T -WRAF i1P1ESOlUIDN SITE DIRECTIONS THE woRR n. ML meas rim IBSENATara usEo ON TIE OPAMwYs A. TIE coNtRnnoR vEMi PwI1FCf Mi Anes moY QATYCE IRE camowm mNsrRlctlDx STMlONDS c fNE ers UANE15 T -YORE YSDENGTYN AITDlM r -YORE CONOYCIdt WE nRrLnDlrs: CONIPILIOR IMS WESiD16 RFfiARO■D 1H11 FJfnLf YDJwE MIDI WY OLPM OIlIU1G CDMS1wIC1DIL Mw DAWLE TD 11E ENONEDI SHALL R ImIF1ED FOR ClNs1GTD16 BDgE NTEHIA T-W■AE CONM.W'IOR COAX HHF T-Y°BAE WYIPILIM mawvs Em_Itsc fRJY 10 NEW ! F]SW. GO WEST ON FNa fDR S YlE3 TD MwY 212 W NEA' MID FA61■Y L0r61RVClDIA SRUCRSE. OR EDUPYpIf, T-YLBIIE - WHXGPOIE 5 YlFS ro IIF// 101 (GREAT PLAl16 Aw.}. TRH LEFT ONTO I(M' 131 SHML BE YYFDNIFLY REPMFD 311 ■PPIILm ro THE PtmcEIDrp •lIM Mpac CGX UAE T -WRAF CONfIVLiOR JAIPEN GNES r-WSAF MNMICI°R 1ppp wEsr >BM siREEf �I w6f oN HWi 2tz FOR J YIfS ro CR 1: TUd RCHf ND fA WFSf idt SATSACiDN U THE 1DYlff OR YIAS■IQ OWNER, 011 to THE CONfR/LIOR SWiL PROYDE ML MECESSMfr' NDCIOIM AAiFR UBIES T-WSAE OpNIpICIOR UM Dp w6E AIYVWA) r-YO■lF MNMM;Ip1 � � 61°01° � ROAD ON THE 1K �Nr CROMO ORAWNGm RR 60 OANIXs REPRESENTATAE, K THE DOTME Di THE BAgONO, FANTOD, HNCEib OR OTIEA SUPPdff FOR ML EONA T■E SSIID CONIPILIDE 0111Dt rtD6 RELUN■C 1HE SAYE lIM N06E NATER) T -YORE CONTRACTOR CNOI■OO qR ffY1 CGY i-IIOaE WNIRrC10R roam a umEr3DD OnNE 5. THE COIfIRILIs1 SIYLL E OYOISIBIE FOR NO SNML fi. GIY APPRQTD PWlS SMALL R KEPT N A PI/JI BO% MO CAOINRP qR f011 CDA T-YOdF mNipGlgt SOE tlwllp4 WIEIaY.S CONIRIGI°R CONTRACTOR REPTILE OR M]EDY. Nff FNILIT. APROPF)l M NiflSpR SNLLL MDi BE USED N WORKYEN. NL LOISRLCIION SER SIZE DROVA■p WlEAWS CONIPILIOR NNISLIOR NTENIN YOWTNQ PPE ! ARACIaT T-YOSiE WNIRICIM jam. j��� W1FAW5 011 'NOwONIL9V DII MM aMANE WNICl1 SW11 SHM1 RERFLI SNIE NFiMWT10N. 1HE CONIRILIDR SNNl OWL !0 HDIl16 BFTORE CCONQ IPPFM NR« DHE YFM KIFA IIF C0IPIETDN ND rtm YE•IYN " C000 Ld1sOpA ME C01PlE1E SET OF INTD•M 1Eounic WE k BRraET T -YORE FanRrcTDe tTAR611K BROfi "SPF ro TwR) Tti13A` mrllRreTs T_YORE - YNNEIPIXS GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 8000 WEST >•N STREET ACCEPTANCE DF TIE wase NDEA Tris carawer. P1I16 WnN ui aEvmors. ADDDIG AVS C!w<E oaOERs wANAIDE B110cE (ETY+f ro r'wR) T -IDBS C0IIITR/cl0a wWhslOE u1mEA (IDAFtt) T -rose mamielaR stili 433 ON 1HE PRF316E AT /11 1NE5. HESE NE ro BE UiDEIt r1E Eo■i� YN SSISi lwil CRER AIPA R1 •�. 6. IME CONIPICIpI SHALL RFLpE Nl RIlRISN NO WASrE UM Di TE JOB AIPEAPTEIODlf. wAYDi!■E IAOOFA (f01Ef11) T-YOaE WHIP/CIOR fEMOE CONRICIM CONINGI°R W. lOLL fwFE 1-1DO-252-11N1 WiFAWS ON A wAAIR lE56. MA SHML IXFAC6E SIRX,T CUBR0. 0.D1 JCB CLFNIWO 1HRJUG1101/f Fl]WY CCNIWLIOR NIIINL'IOR SIOEROpDD 'RNK CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR . � "nom FNN �� DPa1 corPlDDrI 1Np �0` C0N1""10R C0M1R"C0R 91fiORE C°"'"'G1OR °°"'""1qt ABBREVIATIONS DRAWING INDEX a wDTaE nil Mrws ARE ro R LEsr N A BROdI DEw marDx AT THE EMI o< EADI Gr. CODES AND STANDARDS SRRDIN IW tatnRrcl3R PoiEn DasoNrELT • Enu Boz COIrTRILTOR cOIIIRADTOR ). 11E CONIRILId1 SIMLL SNTAWm TE OATIER'S PROPERTY POWFfl OIS1;VlELf ! YEIEA BOY CONRILIVi CON1RACfp1 YEIER UTATY IIIUIY NN51 ITiCH1ER A AYPFAE 0r1 AYYEEA OUsq CUSIRULIION NO SHWL REPTILE NN aATUDED BILA BIEDir K CiaXR BREWER ILP iNNE(M11MG A1P■M-11 ..... PIMEI.•! Ii➢IUM1pN NA fiIFAK rg16 PImPEaIY K 1)E LNTEIi ro ORIPJYL COrnD1oN OR RTIFA. '� � SWli COYPET WOH 1K UTESf NIOPIED YEIER URIIY UMY C8 G1CN BASN AFF ABO.E iYPf fIDCR A1PNE-Dt ..... SITE RAN EIYION a THE FCLLDMND PUBIYMIDI@ Cl CENTER ME /AI�7//5o IH01E 0N°IND /"iiMD�t ::::: �N MGI�NN /Jm TQYEIt EiEVATION a R SNYL R TIE RESPOMS1l11Y S TIE WIITRALTOR TD 1. At1Y (MIERIGVI SOCEtt FOR TESINO MID W1TAlAlS) CO�NC. Cp�Y'REIE MC Iy ��gt��0�Apif. 1°Caro ALL °°�i1G �� SER NOAw HFRrnI x ra (.WERM.VI mHCRETE RSTiTIIlE) WATER TOWER SITE ROOFTOP SITE mxsr. cararRuclnx DB c■Baxr aRF/JaR SMloMQ OMwA6 011 NOf, Nlp ro PROID.T TEL FRpI MULE THE 1 AM (rLERICAV N51TNE OF SiDl STN0110 - A15 (t) - SfN0110 DEL 2 ! Gd ] EpRt0E1 CABiER ODMAACIOn SIYLL BEN Nl FYPENSES FOR REPAN OR W16RUCfD11) CONIR CONIRILidi CKT CWKAR NAJL'DOIf OF URRES OR OILER PROPERTY DAYAQO) N ♦. AWS (NEwUJI PIF1Lii. SOCEiY) rtDl lIIA16KD M NSTALIID IT IIFY ill■IWSIIEO n NSTNJID M lir. RTAR W CCPPFR RMI ! EifVAlM1N NEMS COIiiItIL•Ibl WIM THE EIQAnW OF IIMC 1 TIBC (NAFDwI BUIONO CODE) BR PIAThSEI TORE CONTRACTOR ROUTOP PIATOl01 T -MORE CUNRKT011 � �N � F�T SVILIA - ATS (1) - SINLVm NP! Ali EgKYFNf LABREf %IN k L HOOT (YiNXE50IA OFPARIIE)!f K TRN6PORIATDN) i. lrE CWIRtLis1 SIWL BE RESPOIE1sE fOR TE COYPIEIE a EEE (i81faTE OF Fl£CrtrYl MO ElF■iPp�lC$ BR PIATFORY FOIAMlION CCNR/CIOR CONIPILTOR ROOFTOP ANTENNA SLID/ATTACNp/f T-Y°FIIF CONIRICI°R OR DOYN WA NAAULT MPFIE(S) SENONO - AH t) - SIML1Rl 511E iPRQ'EYFNf SMIi1Gip16 SECUw1Y U TE 511E wllE TE JOB 6 N PRDQRE6 ANO lMR lIE JOB 6 COIAEIFD PER U.Aa °. MEC (NAIpWl FIECIwI•X Com �) liC (POIIFII/iDLO) i -YORE CCMRACIOR liC (POWEIt/IFILO) T -1100•E DOMRAOIq OGAa �I Y pyA„(� SPIBIMD - MS 1)) - fEIA�A SPECJYNTYM6 1Q ML COr6,RYC1Ylll MDRK SIYIl carEDwl ro THE ase MC to NErA (IM1dL1 EIECIMfK WMFKIUEI6 ASSOMTXYI) su GET T-YOBIF WFIEIIfA>AM B■U U9ET r-T10®F NPIAEIIFMRIN EIEC. E1SIRfK TBs � TRNEfG SARW � - ♦ S (i3 - � E•�sPE611AT016 NL OIfEA DDgURO CODES, NDNG NTH ilE GOIDUsO 11. N6C (IyITpIME ElELilaYi SIiE1Y WIR165X1N) gIs UB■EiS r-YOBIE IYRF]plfATpN BR WNIIS T-WSE YREIENTATpN �K. �E��T �,G WH-MFD SbHLRp - E]5 (t - srNLVN /NIFIBN k COV( DRJIMWIO RES1R1LfNE CODES it OSTM (CCCWAlI01ME SAREIY NO HEALTH/ NYIHSfRAIDN) NOf N CONIRY,T SPDilGlmlE 11 lR (1MOEPWwlD6 IIHMAroRE$ NC.) NIIDMA T -YORE aTI1MC10R M1ID■N i-WRF CONTPILIUE EX6f. fX61N0 PK Il. 11E CONIRACIsf AW .ALL STIBCONAILI016 SNALL LOYPLY fa, IPPIJUAE ILUl CODES uo awxNANC6 Ra FDDiNO PH PNEL SIMONO - EA (1) - SIMIYRO MBON\ COV/ RETMIAIpN PHASE SPE[•1GTDI6 WIM NL LAK CODE REGAKm16 MO SLATE OEPARNEM COW UAE T -YORE CDNIWLIM COAX CAERE T -YORE lX•rtaILiOR G DyIOE M Di NWSTsI REGUTI.1Mlrb MA CNpCII OF NDUSIRVL RIIFFA Gs6 T-YOBAE WIRRILigt .RAPER GBIII T -YORE WNIRILIpI GLLV. FXVMI® RCPT �Ma°HOSE � USNt�(OSIM) REpURFLFNR RDEN ro THE CODES SECIIDX LEGEND UM Dow IIOW NAEEID T�IORE CDIITAILIOR INA (IAT rD6E NWwR) r -WRC CDNIRAOIM ONE. IKK�I�O YEIK y�j � �vM® SRL 12 11E AA�yEnifBif SW11 O8fM1 NO PAY TOR .1M' T41M5, OETIL M11EER °��C � � �Y T -YORE CONTRACTOR °qqN■I° 1015 FOR DaV T -YORE WMRICI°R AOL YETK � TEL Tp SINOVIp - N14 (1) - STMOVO flFLMfX SPELfIGllg6 ®EIW. IXDi56 AVD R6PFLi10N5 NECfSSW! FOR PEIBLWIIAIICF 511E GOI•pL' 11rF1645 COMIWCIDI CONIAM•IM SIZE GR01iirF WIERYLS CONOMCIOR CDRRKTM YN YNMIY YiIN 1RAMSTDIkEl1 NOTES Di TIE WORN AND INCWOE TIOSE N THE COST OFTHE YBa Y6CEDINEDIIS TTP TYPNYL StMOVm -Nis (1) - STANDARD C0r8iwICIDN SPf]xIL51D18 WgIX ro THE OWNER. t DETAIL ANIF)AA ATTMSEIE]TS (IOwpl) T-WRE mxTwciUi MBEIaM Wun"o PPE ! TwfJ¢r T-WSE CONTRACTOR OR.Tas � � °/° qAO cENEIPl NDRs sIEET t wm s w� srMOMm - N]5 (1) - cD COISiRJLT1pN SPFCiY2Onr6 INIE>EM YOIMNO PPE ! BRILIQi T -YORE CONTRACTOR wTOFiro CaV ATGDipRS C0111RILIOR L9111RILIOR PL PLATE 10. f1CIlRED puENS%M5 HAVE PRECEDENCE QDt oPAwic sGIF, $i (EQPT ro TIB) T-WRE CONTRACTOR uCFRRgiO wows DONTRICIOR COFJIWL•tOR RmA REQUIRED W rGTE1PN>OF SiuOND - S15 (1) - STNOND EDIIYNf Pu1fOw1 fa■dllON Mo ORrA pMWiN4 HAN: PRECEODILE U'fll sIAWl EAVELTIDE AImOE SLATE ORAWWOS bRL!( ACCIROLY Oi ALL OWN iAsors N Sf. SSIYAE FEET DRAoro dl WMXSI OwOIWI DETAR WAS DRAAM CGY ATTADEIEIl15 (IONF/l) T -YORE CONIPIL•IOR SIIENoIE NNIRIL1aR CUTIRILIDI Sa STAINES SIEFL 1 p wTnwR YErm nMl, sECTlpat MO oErru TE FRG. TINIE4 SPECi1GILY Wlm. W LIQ( frEREATE UNLESS NOIFD OTERW6E SiANONO -525 S12 - STMOARO EOlslUlf PIAli0R11 SPQAIGIDIS ANY WiFRPLS OFF -SRF OR PEAf1AB1 Nf! ONSiRUL'IDN BIAIIK DDORS DRML R ON SWE ORAwW 5■L SWM STANOND - 5]s 111 - $TNOVO Fg1P1EHf PUIFORY EXIDOON, UIRL 111E ARURIC! Qi DRAWN'. OiEN51DS NAN RFD! FENCE CSEAULTM CONDMCfOR POAFR OtSCON1D.T ! 1ETFR BOLI COMIRILIUI COIARILIOR SPEiS SPECIFIGiX1N5 wAwCIIEE BRIDGE $PECFYV�Igrb NAEED M.VET ILRIML fE1D OAEMId6 =� �R IwLFMaOIRD YdOE COIRRICIOR WNIRICIOR YE1FA UTARY UTR111' m 51EEL la. CON10.lLfs1 SHML NOIiY TE ENC•EDI U NN CUBtET$ SrtAORY CWIRILIOR CURRICIDt SIAIICf. SIRULRIPAL DR D6CREPMOYs wms TIE CONTYCf OODl11fNR VIII A SECTION T.C. LOP OF gX1B THE LONIRILf COCUEEIl15 NO TIE iwlD CUSDDI6 PRDS POAFR 06CaNQT.T k YEIFA Bm( LCNIPACIOR CURRALTOR TAP. TOP OF PANTO � ro EXEClRNO LIE WOPK N OIIFSIDIL St YETG URIIY uruTr 5 LOP 0i STAB SgWVm - Si5 (1) - STNYYJm NtiDiiA No COV( UAE f6fAllAIDN OIIAN'IY. ON M1iLM ONfWAL SECTION WAS DRAW T/ 1� 0< SPELiIGTMW6 BIANf CENOIFS SFLIDN 6 ON SAYE sMWNO g/ BOi1DY K r iAl[ wvm e®loI � Ansrm w n w ai avQ rwie rssT o t T/ID,b m1LD FDR NiQFDSE;—"ii°� HALLA NURSERY z 4AtN CEIANOFS PER IYMIDIm I w N012 Tl5 giMlC IMS N°f BVN P19ID® NO PnP>■i M me n utlr my bc! slp�vYm a TTE sAE PnaDrtr DF r -YORE - YWWEIPIXS ene 1Ml I � A aAr u..n..a PMmimd ESMw eo•o w PAw Al P902 T � LAwET ANo a ifNf ro THE eonRaWD1 FOR THfit W� WP �■ n tn. smY r �� R RILDi >/2o/s PROJECT INFO. &GENERAL NOTES ■ 1 ■ ■Mob 11 e s � a`r. ,vlo N mr�MltoN a • LIE IoW a 1H6 OOwYO TIE BgOMR PR0E4R saw ri ■ As Nairn ro RET1101 rt IRVN RmLLESf ND ACRE6 }IEv R •iL NOf x REPROpICE3. E1TPia TENT On 1Ww.lA� a YAIER >/m/oi DnlmEs SsagD of ow¢TLY as wRarLY, NOR ...r. r 1pOf1 weer Aa w euc 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD. F ®mom PI■AlE oltEA TIVN biDl n s CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA MINNEAPOLIS MARKET F— �•. t'R' •�•••� � •DRE is..w rutin a Y■E Al P902 -Tl 2 s a ] f , HALLA NURSERY I euRnxm •,anrla \ \ o$ c, D _ po51M: PMPfpir lIE — — — — — — — 2\ IcRAvsi NIFA� � \\ Cppy�py �\ 2 FLfE K FATRM. \ J 4 \ N \ 1 Cl,os,ra Tn \ \\\\s\\\\ \X ` Iy \\\ T-YO1lc ,sa-w O � CamTRs I ,� ROV •Doom \ , , 11 \ \ ACCTSS RNp III \ \ I \ \ I ` \ ` ° i IEM 13 OL F�ABb.' 1 _ I I Rua II I I . •� ,E-•• .� I I � ,• ,Bf r\Tc I .I. g� !----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- --------------------- SITE PLAN A C Yl[ t\Y•1 OIIMI m' MfnID n M Y MIIYL mmC OaOr IOC O Ms NwQS I- n,a•°rEaN•rna,AasI• 'a"la"ge' ei "�"' "'s ""' °I"'°"n°°w` °"s°^ HALLA NURSERY 1 7" FOR %%01 R Po °0Y Tnp�p6 ■ T • ■ ■■ Mobile • T¢,E sac6 F}ONR.P,•FAa1,OY TMtiOIiOR®IE " p cr, TIE mW K 116 aaMT■■ wm¢r N• s tExr .My. Eft a M' aw a. ,m a a. s,r. a leaa.we Al P902 SITE PLAN z ows¢ F4A Wga1O "'" WT aan Aaass ro snlTNT R •al Ilpf [E n.aT/ID/O6onrA•sc asrrs[n or ++�- r �f'r I�r n er 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD. usaa FM AM' PURfUSE pnEn TWN nRCll rt s niaastm CFIANHASSEN. MINNESOTA MINNEAPOLIS MARKET°•'•a° ° sem A1P902-C7 2 2 wrr Dale r -mo 0o mlac arm -m oleo om wam-,Doo❑ am ra[o. NMac,w ■IIIIIII11U. 1— r ■ 1 N 0 Al ENLARGED SITE PLAN SF4C Ile - V ' � 6Y YR 6Y®1 LQaIOI ®� .w.wID CM I xl T w,1.Yl a.®C OMwO ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ T � • ■ Mob 11 a MINNEAPOLIS MARKET w1i2 116 wwc nes wl Bm n9aIRD MD a ,xE snE rrtrnurc w )wort - urtrAra�a uwar wo s uxr ro txE aorta)wn tort ntw ag o y xw w 11E IAW Oi T6 artrt•1t:. 111E BdWIwR PM16FS )an routs ro rtanwx n wax rtmu[sr .ro )a•xs TNT rt 1x1 xaf 6E RFAW y aaPFA ItN1 art onssAa'c osrosEn v orucr�x ort rtmunir, xort r�wsm risrost onus r•» wHw rt a °Ii°'' ^"vy owi "'" °"' °" w •a b �n w uWw n9' isi rpwNYen w4 �e 'i i°w.. M' u..�a vra�a�e r+Mww Isar xr a. a xw mee. a �rrx.eee. . �. ytl y r... r_ x•wx 6 HALLA NURSERY Al P902 ENLARGED SITE PLAN 1 7/M4 idt PICIPOYL d OW 2 WILb awrAs vOt uwlam w ®w 0. MILu! .o. )/m/ort a®w F YrtitA .oc )/ID/a6 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD. i CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA wm w .a a ws� Al P902 -C2 2 •xur awo xrw - ns o xe o ww rrtt wm - m o 0 o xxn weom - m o s o um nt •v •noea3 w ! n ! I T-YOdE NIIp2W iMBIC 2MS D I II C ■»B r L r L B T M u0. ! n ! I T-YOdE NIIp2W iMBIC 2MS D I II C ■»B r L r L n AMIFMa u0. T-aSBBE ANIFI•YS MD' _ FACBO 1W Ws L1 (W&UA) CONNECtIOM IDI2111 pl coIDR coo[ I �FlllleE OMIIIM AMIFMIY\5 R IB-0CDr w - � m teS 1 5/r 1161E RFD A2 a 1e-WOr I �FNUS GRREA ANIERY.S D' R4 teS 1 5/e• 0.ND DFD R2 Iw 1 s/C OOlIB1E Rro - � (5) PED t wtm-IB-OmP tw B n Iw 1 3/C YF11O• I FDIURE GRRRn a11F!•NS B2 0- W-dkdi n w In w. w ua..1e. s.e wwwe� '�' ' •^ O 6y Ilam P-. � Fn�•w BrMweI BMAl tw O YM tow 1 s/e• dYD Yf11D11 T� 1W YDNOr0.E m 11FIIME - y Y5 - - (5) YFIIDW Tw p■ m I K xor a: RP•� ffOF MR My" CI IOe3-le�W 2b F B1 taw 1 s/w BWE m law 1 s/B• TRPIL BIDE C! M•Y1B-0Yp 2W O x Im' t 5/e' aGD alL m 1W' 1 5/8• Wta RlE C] FIIIIINE _ _ m _ (3) a DE MINNEAPOLIS MARKET "' ••�' + •61•.6•E arz eeuE AT ctm u...•w.an A1P902-A1 r 2 8 awlY CIInO Ww - 1p D 6 ❑ p6 1R[ 1In\\1{D -16 DMO D IOwI Ie01.1[M - ld D 6 D aY0 d[ IW 11R6A1 A! 2 Y Td T-aosE EgIPISIIf � P1Arzsd1 •/Ed61n1f varcls R 1 A \ SOUTH ELEVATION C2 scue A r arz arta e�tr °" AROV6 w n aE + ijlQar 1 stem EOR PWP� "• a 2 IW"j DOMES M AMUM eN s T-MCBRE 4'-0• IADIIBM FP•! CIO W s lE AMIEMw MD B6CIDr ' AePFA CARIE (iT% I AIIFM1a NM fIMML CARE RF:OIRwMRDS ENLARGED ELEVATION AMIFMa u0. oM•E vat MD' TYPE sFzmR Ws L1 (W&UA) CONNECtIOM IDI2111 pl coIDR coo[ Al R IB-0CDr w O RI Im• 1 S/e• RFD m teS 1 5/r 1161E RFD A2 a 1e-WOr O D' R4 teS 1 5/e• 0.ND DFD R2 Iw 1 s/C OOlIB1E Rro A3 FUIORE (5) PED Bl wtm-IB-OmP tw B n Iw 1 3/C YF11O• n leo• 1 s/e' 1RPIE YD1DM B2 0- W-dkdi n w In w. w ua..1e. s.e wwwe� '�' ' •^ O 6y Ilam P-. � Fn�•w BrMweI BMAl tw O YM tow 1 s/e• dYD Yf11D11 Y2 teC 1 5/I1' OpeF TB10• m 11FIIME - - Y5 - - (5) YFIIDW Tw p■ m I K xor a: RP•� ffOF MR My" CI IOe3-le�W 2b O B1 taw 1 s/w BWE m law 1 s/B• TRPIL BIDE C! M•Y1B-0Yp 2W O x Im' t 5/e' aGD alL m 1W' 1 5/8• Wta RlE C] FIIIIINE _ _ m _ (3) a DE I ! I • idl MORE BadawTMM REfp1 ro srAlntFw oRueM ES4. MDI@ 1. NNIE6a CARIE lfltCita H11E BRM OEIEIB•ED BASED ON 11E5E PIAS GRE LENCIIES LLSIED ARE NMMNIdNTE NO ARE Maf MRBMS m z IDm FOR fABRIGIIOIL DIE m Fm Fa1MDMra ICIIDE AIID•a GRE IFMC116 ROIIBED WY VA!! nYIY LL)MI16 TABLUIFA 2 ALL IOGlO1M Ilm; IJ9O I GRFB m R: CRIME LOOED AT MSE (» t/2' MlE PVC fIFOr1eM1 TIPS A 1CP a 1WE11 (ArID•A IEVEl) a WSE a 1D•FR e AT Brs GBIIEi mrs¢11oM PDM $ 1 ADD•vI=c Gab sIOE InBltE CRd11O MINS aeMR•W a TWEE (s) P m llmt m f➢lFD•3 A TOP W m•FFI (NlIYdFIL W IEYFL) p RO ISCIWYGILY cclBsm ro a Bandl of TD•DE a1E FMD I•nwaclFEr cDIBEnm To BRnIR• Bw. c AT Brs vBBEr wlnxlMM roar. w AnFMMAs FDR ErAI scloR vtui R: sPACEo A NMf IEss TI141 IC -a' APIAf. S A1naa SECTORS swu BE MEASIREB wm TwE xoR1M AS sIu•TI ON TIf 511E PIAIL IwC1ElIL' IORIM 6 2S FAST Ci TRS MBRIIL DDI ANTENNA REQUIREMENTS ENLARGED ELEVATION AMiFMW CWE vet u0. TYPE �� IDB111 Oa C0.di COLE 1 Ws L1 (W&UA) scuE: 1 a -1 ENLARGED ELEVATION scuE: 1 a -1 t/[wIC YY•Y0 1061 O • xonrE: TIBS on••M r1As Mm Rut Puar9BD AID 6 11E 50.E w9PFRIY BP T-MdiF - INFIPgE a IFIlfro ` usE aaY 0- W-dkdi n w In w. w ua..1e. s.e wwwe� '�' ' •^ O 6y Ilam P-. � Fn�•w BrMweI BMAl 6II Trm/a HALLA NURSERY P(102 ANTENNA INFO. &TOWER ELEVATION i • m w R "o0D' • ■■ Mobile Tw p■ m I K xor a: RP•� ffOF MR My" w.- M. Ip2 IIbEY cWEA •� w T/]D/OBasPDSFn tArz 10000 GREAT PONS BLVD, usmrOR Axr PE•PnsE onDM TMVI weal D M FllaaSliO. CWNHASSEN, MINNESOTA MINNEAPOLIS MARKET "' ••�' + •61•.6•E arz eeuE AT ctm u...•w.an A1P902-A1 r 2 awlY CIInO Ww - 1p D 6 ❑ p6 1R[ 1In\\1{D -16 DMO D IOwI Ie01.1[M - ld D 6 D aY0 d[ IW 11R6A1 A! CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on November 3, 2005, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Amendment to Site Plan, Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this3A_ day of , 2005. u V• 1!�� MR.01 1111- KIM I MEUWISSEN Notary Public -Minnesota My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2010 SCANNED Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd. Request for a Site Pian Amendment for the expansion and Proposal: reclesigin of a club house — Halla Greens Planning File: 05-39 Applicant: Don Halla Property Located on the southeast comer of the intersection of Great Plains Location: Boulevard (Highway 101) and Pioneer Trail. A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff at 952-227-1134 Questions & or e-mail saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to Comments: submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online at htta:1/206.10.76.6/woblink7 the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciavindustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersondrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Plannino Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, November 15 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd. Request for a Site Plan Amendment for the expansion and Proposal: redesign of a club house — Halla Greens Plannin File: 05-39 Applicant: Don Halla Property Located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Great Plains Location: Boulevard (Highway 101) and Pioneer Trail. A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the prii If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff at 952-227-1134 Questions & or e-mail saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to Comments: submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online at htta://206.10.76.6/weblink7 the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciallindustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersontrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included In the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Plannina Staff person named on the notification. SUBJECT ulsolalmer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and What sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and! the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational. tracking or any other purpose requiring erecting measurement of distance or direction or precision in Me depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found pease contact 952.227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Sutures §666.03. Subd. 21 (200(3), and Me user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and erWressly waves all darns, and agrees to defend, indamity, and hold harmless the City from any and all blains brought by User, its "Otmes or agents, or third parties which ansa out W the users access or use of data provided. This map is neither a legally recalled map nor a Survey and is trot intended to ce used as one. This map is a compilation W records, information and data located in varus city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding vire area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warant that the Geographic Imorauon System (GIST Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City dors not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, backing or any other purpose requiring emoting measurement of distance or direction or preasion In the depiction of geographic features. 0 errors or discrepancies are found please comact 952-227.1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant In Minnesota Statres §666.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user W this map acknowledges that the City shall net be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claim, and agrees to defend, momirmfy, and hold harmless Me City from any and all dairns brought by User, its employees or agents, or third padres which area out of the users access or use of data provided. Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) Halla Greens (aka Chanhassen Short Course) Site Plan Amendment Planning Case No. 05-39 495 Pioneer Trail City of Chanhassen 14) SUBJECT SITE ROGER A & KIMBERLY A LEE ROBERT & CHRISTIN E BOECKER ANDREW T RIEGERT 600 96TH ST W 610 96TH ST W 620 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8601 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8601 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8601 ROGER G NOVOTNY ROBERT W SCHOEWE THOMAS E & BRENDA L ANDERSON 560 PINEVIEW CT 9611 FOXFORD RD 9371 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8697 CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-8689 CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-8685 ROBERT FUGUE & RICHARD S & KATHERINE S ASPLIN MAGDY A & JUNE L EBRAHIM KIMBERLY L HEIN-FUGLIE 9370 FOXFORD RD 541 PINEVIEW CT 521 PINEVIEW CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8684 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8697 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8697 WENDELL & JACQUELINE SCHOTT DAVID J & SHARON K GATTO JAMES D & JANET M DINGEL 9350 FOXFORD RD 9631 FOXFORD RD 9351 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8684 CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 -8689 CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 -8685 DONALD E HALLA & CARVER COUNTY AKELA N 8 ANNA MAE M SANDRA J CWAYNA HALLA CARVER COUNTY GOVT CTR -ADMIN JOHN ASP 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 600 4TH ST E 9860 RASPBERRY A, BEBE RRY M 55318 -1180 CHASKA , MN 55318 -9465 CHASKA . MN 55318 -2102 WILLIAM GRATZ VIVEK KAUL & BOYD S PETERSON 9851 PIONEER CIR SHERYL R EBERT 9860 PIONEER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8696 9875 DELPHINIUM LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8696 CHASKA , MN 55318 -1176 MICHAEL ROBERT NELSON KEN K HOLMBERG & JEFFREY B & CAROL G SORUM 9870 PIONEER CIR NANCY J ROSSBERG 9900 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8696 9885 RASPBERRY HL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8551 CHASKA , MN 55318 -1180 GERALD R JR & SHELLY D COOK SHAWN S & NICOLA S SMITH DONALD LLA ETAL 9920 DELPHINIUM LN 725 BRAMBLE DR 10000 GRE PLAINS BLVD CHASKA, MN 55318-1177 CHASKA, MN 55318- CHASKA, 55318-9465 GERALD F & NANCY G SLOCUM JEFFREY R & BARBARA C MICHELL WILLIAM J MCNEELY & 9920 DEERBROOK DR 9961 DEERBROOK DR MITRA BAHARI MCNEELY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8551 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8552 9940 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8551 THOMAS J & KATHLEEN R GERTZ JAMES M HAUTMAN & STEPHEN M & NICOLE DRAGOS 10001 GREAT PLAINS BLVD DOROTHY D HAUTMAN 9960 DEERBROOK DR CHASKA , MN 55318 -9466 10095 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8551 CHASKA , MN 55318 -9466 DAVID R TEICH DAVID P & JUDY M WALSTAD GAYE LYNN GUYTON 1217 MONROE ST S 10071 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 10083 GREAT PLAINS BLVD SHAKOPEE , MN 55379 -2062 CHASKA, MN 55318 -9466 CHASKA , MN 55318 -9466 3015 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 Feet Portable Golf Ball Washers Page 1 of 1 Toil Free: MART 760-7 .� [RANGE riving Range Equipment and Supplies Home I About us Products I View Cart I Check Out Contact Us 40 Semi -Automatic Ball Washers Portable Ball Washer This model is an excellent coice for ranges that are busy but do not need the pre-soak feature included with larger washers. The unit cleans up to 20,000 balls per hour. A direct -drive motor simplifies the operation and increases t durability of the washer. The hopper holds up 1,200 balls. The roto -molded polyethylene body is designed to stanc considerabel wear. Finally, the two wheels means you can easily take this unit where you need it. RM 131 $1685.00 Portable ball washer ,is I Products I View Cart I Check Out I Contact Us home : about us : golf range products : shopping cart instructions : view cart : check out ©RangeMart. All rights reserved. http://www.rangemart.conVportable.htm Site maintained by DesignWebMagic 3/16/2006 Golf Work Start End Watering Course Start Time of Play of Play Time Bluff Creek 1/2 hour before Light enough Too dark to overnight 952445-5685 sunrise to see see Mike Chaska Par 30 1/2 hour before Light enough Close when overnight 952 443-3642 sunrise to see last golfer leaves - Mark 10:30p-llp Dahlareen 1/2 hour before sunrise Play till dark overnight 952448-1676, ext #6 sunrise Clubhouse Kiet6 varies lop - Midnight Hazeltine 1/2 hour before First light dark overnight 9524484929 sunrise Stonebrooke 1/2 hr -45 min sunrise dark overnight 9524454442 before sunrise Dwayne Braemar As soon as there is 6:00am dark overnight 952-826-6799 light Deer Run 5:15am- 6:00am dark overnight 952443-2351 5:30arn January 2006 Minneapolis -St. Paul. Minnesota Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3 4 5 06 7 Sun Rise: 7:51 am Sun Rise: 7:51 am Sun Rise: 7:51 am Sun Rise: 7:51am Sun Rise: 7:51 am Sun Rise: 7:51 am Sun Rise: 7:51 am Sun Set: 4:41 pm Sun Set: 4:42pm Sun Set: 4:43pm Sun Set: 4:44pm Sun Set: 4:45pm Sun Set: 4:46pm Sun Set: 4:47pm Moon Rise: 9:39am Moon Rise: 10:12am Moon Rise: 10:39am Moon Rise: 11:01 am Moon Rise: 11:21am Moon Rise: 11:40am Moon Rise: 11:59am Moon Set: 6:33pm Moon Set: 7:58pm Moon Set: 9:21 pm Moon Set: 10:40pm Moon Set: 11:56pm Moon Set: none Moon Set: 1:12am First Qtr. 12:57pm 8 9 10 11 12 13 014 Sun Rise: 7:50am Sun Rise: 7:50am Sun Rise: 7:50am Sun Rise: 7:50am Sun Rise: 7:49am Sun Rise: 7:49am Sun Rise: 7:48am Sun Set: 4:48pm Sun Set: 4:49pm Sun Set: 4:50pm Sun Set: 4:51 pm Sun Set: 4:52pm Sun Set: 4:54pm Sun Set: 4:55pm Moon Rise: 12:22pm Moon Rise: 12:49pm Moon Rise: 1:23pm Moon Rise: 2:06pm Moon Rise: 2:58pm Moon Rise: 3:59pm Moon Rise: 5:05pm Moon Set: 2:27am Moon Set: 3:41 am Moon Set: 4:54am Moon Set: 6:02am Moon Set: 7:02am Moon Set: 7:51 am Moon Set: 8:29am Full Moon: 3:49am 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Sun Rise: 7:48am Sun Rise: 7:47am Sun Rise: 7:47am Sun Rise: 7:46am Sun Rise: 7:45am Sun Rise: 7:45am Sun Rise: 7:44am Sun Set: 4:56pm Sun Set: 4:57pm Sun Set: 4:59pm Sun Set: 5:00pm Sun Set: 5:01 pm Sun Set: 5:03pm Sun Set: 5:04pm Moon Rise: 6:12pm Moon Rise: 7:19pm Moon Rise: 8:23pm Moon Rise: 9:26pm Moon Rise: 10:29pm Moon Rise: 11:33pm Moon Rise: none Moon Set: 8:59am Moon Set: 9:23am Moon Set: 9:42am Moon Set: 9:59am Moon Set: 10:14am Moon Set: 10:30am Moon Set: 10:46am 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Sun Rise: 7:43am Sun Rise: 7:42am Sun Rise: 7:41am Sun Rise: 7:40am Sun Rise: 7:39am Sun Rise: 7:39am Sun Rise: 7:38am Sun Set: 5:05pm Sun Set: 5:07pm Sun Set: 5:08pm Sun Set: 5:09pm Sun Set: 5:11 pm Sun Set: 5:12pm Sun Set: 5:14pm Moon Rise: 12:40am Moon Rise: 1:50am Moon Rise: 3:04am Moon Rise: 4:20am Moon Rise: 5:33am Moon Rise: 6:37am Moon Rise: 7:28am Moon Set: 11:04am Moon Set: 11:27am Moon Set: 11:56am Moon Set: 12:36pm Moon Set: 1:29pm Moon Set: 2:38pm Moon Set: 4:00pm Last Qtr: 9:14am 29 30 31 Sun Rise: 7:36am Sun Rise: 7:35am Sun Rise: 7:34am Sun Set: 5:15pm Sun Set: 5:16pm Sun Set: 5:18pm Moon Rise: 8:07am Moon Rise: 8:38am Moon Rise: 9:02am Moon Set: 5:27pm Moon Set: 6:54pm Moon Set: 8:18pm New Moon: 8:15am February 2006 Minneapolis -St. Paul, Minnesota Sunday N-lunday 'Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3 4 Sun Rise: 7:33am Sun Rise: 7:32am Sun Rise: 7:31am Sun Rise: 7:30am Sun Set: 5:19pm Sun Set: 5:21pm Sun Set: 5:22pm Sun Set: 5:24pm Moon Rise: 9:24am Moon Rise: 9:43am Moon Rise: 10:03am Moon Rise: 10:25am Moon Set: 9:39pm Moon Set: 10:57pm Moon Set: none Moon Set: 12:15am 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Sun Rise: 7:28am Sun Rise: 7:27am Sun Rise: 7:26am Sun Rise: 7:24am Sun Rise: 7:23am Sun Rise: 7:22am Sun Rise: 7:20am Sun Set: 5:25pm Sun Set: 5:26pm Sun Set: 5:28pm Sun Set: 5:29pm Sun Set: 5:31 pm Sun Set: 5:32pm Sun Set: 5:34pm Moon Rise: 10:51 am Moon Rise: 11:23am Moon Rise: 12:03pm Moon Rise: 12:52pm Moon Rise: 1:51pm Moon Rise: 2:55pm Moon Rise: 4:02pm Moon Set: 1:31am Moon Set: 2:46am Moon Set: 3:56am Moon Set: 4:58am Moon Set: 5:49am Moon Set: 6:30am Moon Set: 7:02am First Qtr. 12:29am 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Sun Rise: 7:19am Sun Rise: 7:17am Sun Rise: 7:16am Sun Rise: 7:14am Sun Rise: 7:13am Sun Rise: 7:1 lam Sun Rise: 7:10am Sun Set: 5:35pm Sun Set: 5:36pm Sun Set: 5:38pm Sun Set: 5:39pm Sun Set: 5:41 pm Sun Set: 5:42pm Sun Set: 5:44pm Moon Rise: 5:09pm Moon Rise: 6:14pm Moon Rise: 7:18pm Moon Rise: 8:21pm Moon Rise: 9:25pm Moon Rise: 10:30pm Moon Rise: 11:37pm Moon Set: 7:28am Moon Set: 7:48am Moon Set: 8:05am Moon Set: 8:21 am Moon Set: 8:36am Moon Set: 8:52am Moon Set: 9:09am Full Moon: 10:45pm 19 20 321 22 23 24 25 Sun Rise: 7:08am Sun Rise: 7:07am Sun Rise: 7:05am Sun Rise: 7:03am Sun Rise: 7:02am Sun Rise: 7:00am Sun Rise: 6:58am Sun Set: 5:45pm Sun Set: 5:46pm Sun Set: 5:48pm Sun Set: 5:49pm Sun Set: 5:51pm Sun Set: 5:52pm Sun Set: 5:53pm Moon Rise: none Moon Rise: 12:48am Moon Rise: 2:01am Moon Rise: 3:14am Moon Rise: 4:20am Moon Rise: 5:16am Moon Rise: 5:59a n Moon Set: 9:29am Moon Set: 9:54am Moon Set: 10:28am Moon Set: 11:13am Moon Set: 12:13pm Moon Set: 1:28pm Moon Set: 2:52pm Last Qtr: 1:17am 26 927 28 Sun Rise: 6:57am Sun Rise: 6:55am Sun Rise: 6:53am Sun Set: 5:55pm Sun Set: 5:56pm Sun Set: 5:57pm Moon Rise: 6:33am Moon Rise: 7:00am Moon Rise: 7:23am Moon Set: 4:19pm Moon Set: 5:45pm Moon Set: 7:09pm New Moon: 6:31 pm March 2006 Minna olis-St. Paul, Minnesota Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3 4 Sun Rise: 6:52am Sun Rise: 6:50am Sun Rise: 6:48am Sun Rise: 6:46am Sun Set: 5:59pm Sun Set: 6:00pm Sun Set: 6:01pm Sun Set: 6:03pm Moon Rise: 7:44am Moon Rise: 8:05am Moon Rise: 8:26am Moon Rise: 8:51am Moon Set: 8:32pm Moon Set: 9:53pm Moon Set: 11:12pm Moon Set: none i V6 7 8 9 10 11 Sun Rise: 6:44am Sun Rise: 6:43am Sun Rise: 6:41 am Sun Rise: 6:39am Sun Rise: 6:37am Sun Rise: 6:35am Sun Rise: 6:34am Sun Set: 6:04pm Sun Set: 6:06pm Sun Set: 6:07pm Sun Set: 6:08pm Sun Set: 6:10pm Sun Set: 6:11 pm Sun Set: 6:12pm Moon Rise: 9:21am Moon Rise: 9:59am Moon Rise: 10:46am Moon Rise: 11:43am Moon Rise: 12:46pm Moon Rise: 1:52pm Moon Rise: 2:59pm Moon Set: 12:31am Moon Set: 1:45am Moon Set: 2:51 am Moon Set: 3:47am Moon Set: 4:31am Moon Set: 5:06am Moon Set: 5:33am First Qtr: 2:16pm 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Sun Rise: 6:32am Sun Rise: 6:30am Rise: 6:28am Sun Rise: 6:26am Sun Rise: 6:24am Sun Rise: 6:22am Sun Rise: 6:21 am Sun Set: 6:13pm Sun Set: 6:15pm n Set: 6:16pm [Fulln Sun Set: 6:17pm Sun Set: 6:19pm Sun Set: 6:20pm Sun Set: 6:21 pm Moon Rise: 4:05pm Moon Rise: 5:10pm oon Rise: 6:13pm Moon Rise: 7:17pm Moon Rise: 8:22pm Moon Rise: 9:29pm Moon Rise: 10:38pm Moon Set: 5:54am Moon Set: 6:12am oon Set: 6.29am Moon Set: 6:44am Moon Set: 6:59am Moon Set: 7:16am Moon Set: 7:34am Moon: 5:36pm 19 20 21 322 23 24 25 Sun Rise: 6:19am Sun Rise: 6:17am Sun Rise: 6:15am Sun Rise: 6:13am Sun Rise: 6:1 lam Sun Rise: 6:09am Sun Rise: 6:07am Sun Set: 6:23pm Sun Set: 6:24pm Sun Set: 6:25pm Sun Set: 6:26pm Sun Set: 6:28pm Sun Set: 6:29pm Sun Set: 6:30pm Moon Rise: 11:50pm Moon Rise: none Moon Rise: 1:02am Moon Rise: 2:09am Moon Rise: 3:07am Moon Rise: 3:53am Moon Rise: 4:30am Moon Set: 7:58am Moan Set: 8:28am Moon Set: 9:07am Moon Set: 10:00am Moon Set: 11:06am Moon Set: 12:24pm Moon Set: 1:47pm Last Qtr: 1:11 pm 26 27 28 029 30 31 Sun Rise: 6:06am Sun Rise: 6:04am Sun Rise: 6:02am Sun Rise: 6:00am Sun Rise: 5:58am Sun Rise: 5:56am Sun Set: 6:32pm Sun Set: 6:33pm Sun Set: 6:34pm Sun Set: 6:35pm Sun Set: 6:37pm Sun Set: 6:38pm Moon Rise: 4:58am Moon Rise: 5:22am Moon Rise: 5:44am Moon Rise: 6:04am Moon Rise: 6:26am Moon Rise: 6:49am Moon Set: 3:12pm Moon Set: 4:36pm Moon Set: 5:59pm Moon Set: 7:21pm Moon Set: 8:44pm Moon Set: 10:05pm New Moon: 4:16am April 2006 Minneapolis -St. Paul, Minnesota Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 Sun Rise: 5:54am Sun Set: 6:39pm Moon Rise: 7:18am Moon Set: 11:24pm 2 DST Begins 3 4 V5 6 7 8 Sun Rise: 6:52am Sun Rise: 6:51am Sun Rise: 6:49am Sun Rise: 6:47am Sun Rise: 6:45am Sun Rise: 6:43am Sun Rise: 6:41am Sun Set: 7:40pm Sun Set: 7:42pm Sun Set: 7:43pm Sun Set: 7:44pm Sun Set: 7:45pm Sun Set: 7:47pm Sun Set: 7:48pm Moon Rise: 8:53am Moon Rise: 9:38am Moon Rise: 10:32am Moon Rise: 11:35am Moon Rise: 12:41 pm Moon Rise: 1:49pm Moon Rise: 2:55pm Moon Set: 12:25am Moon Set: 1:37am Moon Set: 2:39am Moon Set: 3:28am Moon Set: 4:07am Moon Set: 4:36am Moon Set: 4:59am First Qtr: 6:01am 9 10 11 12 013 14 15 Sun Rise: 6:40am Sun Rise: 6:38am Sun Rise: 6:36am Sun Rise: 6:34am Sun Rise: 6:32am Sun Rise: 6:31 am Sun Rise: 6:29am Sun Set: 7:49pm Sun Set: 7:51pm Sun Set: 7:52pm Sun Set: 7:53pm Sun Set: 7:54pm Sun Set: 7:56pm Sun Set: 7:57pm Moon Rise: 4:00pm Moon Rise: 5:04pm Moon Rise: 6:07pm Moon Rise: 7:12pm Moon Rise: 8:19pm Moon Rise: 9:28pm Moon Rise: 10:40pm Moon Set: 5:19am Moon Set: 5:35am Moon Set: 5:51am Moon Set: 6:06am Moon Set: 6:22am Moon Set: 6:41 am Moon Set: 7:03am Full Moon: 10:41am 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Sun Rise: 6:27am Sun Rise: 6:25am Sun Rise: 6:24am Sun Rise: 6:22am Sun Rise: 6:20am Sun Rise: 6:19am Sun Rise: 6:17am Sun Set: 7:58pm Sun Set: 7:59pm Sun Set: 8:01pm Sun Set: 8:02pm Sun Set: 8:03pm Sun Set: 8:04pm Sun Set: 8:06pm Moon Rise: 11:53pm Moon Rise: none Moon Rise: 1:02am Moon Rise: 2:02am Moon Rise: 2:52am Moon Rise: 3:30am Moon Rise: 4:00= Moon Set: 7:30am Moon Set: 8:07am Moon Set: 8:55am Moon Set: 9:56am Moon Set: 11:09am Moon Set: 12:28pm Moon Set: 1:50pm Last Qtr: 9:29pm 23 24 25 26 927 28 29 Sun Rise: 6:15am Sun Rise: 6:14am Sun Rise: 6:12am Sun Rise: 6:10am Sun Rise: 6:09am Sun Rise: 6:07am Sun Rise: 6:06am Sun Set: 8:07pm Sun Set: 8:08pm Sun Set: 8:09pm Sun Set: 8:11 pm Sun Set: 8:12pm Sun Set: 8:1 Spm Sun Set: 8:14pm Moon Rise: 4:24am Moon Rise: 4:45am Moon Rise: 5:05am Moon Rise: 5:26am Moon Rise: 5:48am Moon Rise: 6:15am Moon Rise: 6:47am Moon Set: 3:11 pm Moon Set: 4:31 pm Moon Set: 5:52pm Moon Set: 7:13pm Moon Set: 8:35pm Moon Set: 9:57pm Moon Set: 11:14pm New Moon: 1:44pm 30 Sun Rise: 6:04am Sun Set: 8:16pm Moon Rise: 7:28am Moon Set: none May 2006 Minneanolis-St. Paul, Minnesota Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3 04 5 6 Sun Rise: 6:03am Sun Rise: 6:01am Sun Rise: 6:00am Sun Rise: 5:58am Sun Rise: 5:57am Sun Rise: 5:56am Sun Set: 8:17pm Sun Set: 8:18pm Sun Set: 8:19pm Sun Set: 8:21 pm Sun Set: 8:22pm Sun Set: 8:23pm Moon Rise: 8:20am Moon Rise: 9:21am Moon Rise: 10:27am Moon Rise: 11:35am Moon Rise: 12:43pm Moon Rise: 1:48pm Moon Set: 12:23am Moon Set: 1:20am Moon Set: 2:04am Moon Set: 2:37am Moon Set: 3:03am Moon Set: 3:23am First Qtr. 11:14pm 7 8 9 10 11 12 013 Sun Rise: 5:54am Sun Rise: 5:53am Sun Rise: 5:52am Sun Rise: 5:50am Sun Rise: 5:49am Sun Rise: 5:48am Sun Rise: 5:47am Sun Set: 8:24pm Sun Set: 8:26pm Sun Set: 8:27pm Sun Set: 8:28pm Sun Set: 8:29pm Sun Set: 8:30pm Sun Sat: 8:32pm Moon Rise: 2:52pm Moon Rise: 3:55pm Moon Rise: 4:59pm Moon Rise: 6:05pm Moon Rise: 7:14pm Moon Rise: 8:26pm Moon Rise: 9:40pm Moon Set: 3:41 am Moon Set: 3:57M Moon Set: 4:12am Moon Set: 4:28am Moon Set: 4:45am Moon Set: 5:06am Moon Set: 5:32am Full Moon: 12:52am 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Sun Rise: 5:45am Sun Rise: 5:44am Sun Rise: 5:43am Sun Rise: 5:42am Sun Rise: 5:41am Sun Rise: 5:40am Sun Rise: 5:39am Sun Set: 8:33pm Sun Set: 8:34pm Sun Set: 8:35pm Sun Set: 8:36pm Sun Set: 8:37pm Sun Set: 8:38pm Sun Set: 8:40pm Moon Rise: 10:52pm Moon Rise: 11:56pm Moon Rise: none Moon Rise: 12:50am Moon Rise: 1:31am Moon Rise: 2:03am Moon Rise: 2:29am Moon Set: 6:06am Moon Set: 6:51 am Moon Set: 7:50am Moon Set: 9:00am Moon Set: 10:17am Moon Set: 11:37am Moon Set: 12:57pm Last Qtr: 3:21am 21 22 23 24 25 826 27 Sun Rise: 5:38am Sun Rise: 5:37am Sun Rise: 5:36am Sun Rise: 5:35am Sun Rise: 5:34am Sun Rise: 5:34am Sun Rise: 5:33am Sun Set: 8:41pm Sun Set: 8:42pm Sun Set: 8:43pm Sun Set: 8:44pm Sun Set: 8:45pm Sun Set: 8:46pm Sun Set: 8:47pm Moon Rise: 2:51am Moon Rise: 3:10am Moon Rise: 3:30am Moon Rise: 3:50am Moon Rise: 4:14am Moon Rise: 4:43am Moon Rise: 5:20am Moon Set: 2:15pm Moon Set: 3:33pm Moon Set: 4:51 pm Moon Set: 6:11 pm Moon Set: 7:31 pm Moon Set: 8:50pm Moon Set: 10:04pm New Moon: 11:26pm 28 29 30 31 Sun Rise: 5:32am Sun Rise: 5:31am Sun Rise: 5:31am Sun Rise: 5:30am Sun Set: 8:48pm Sun Set: 8:49pm Sun Set: 8:50pm Sun Set: 8:50pm Moon Rise: 6:08am Moon Rise: 7:05am Moon Rise: 8:1 lam Moon Rise: 9:20am Moon Set: 11:07pm Moon Set: 11:57pm Moon Set: none Moon Set: 12:35am June 2006 Minneapolis -St. Paul. Minnesota Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 03 Sun Rise: 5:29am Sun Rise: 5:29am Sun Rise: 5:28am Sun Set: 8:51pm Sun Set: 8:52pm Sun Set: 8:53pm Moon Rise: 10:28am Moon Rise: 11:35am Moon Rise: 12:39pm Moon Set: 1:04am Moon Set: 1:27am Moon Set: 1:45am First Qtr. 5:06pm 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Sun Rise: 5:28am Sun Rise: 5:28am Sun Rise: 5:27am Sun Rise: 5:27am Sun Rise: 5:26am Sun Rise: 5:26am Sun Rise: 5:26am Sun Set: 8:54pm Sun Set: 8:55pm Sun Set: 8:55pm Sun Set: 8:56pm Sun Set: 8:57pm Sun Set: 8:57pm Sun Set: 8:58pm Moon Rise: 1:42pm Moon Rise: 2:45pm Moon Rise: 3:50pm Moon Rise: 4:57pm Moon Rise: 6:07pm Moon Rise: 7:21pm Moon Rise: 8:35pm Moon Set: 2:02am Moon Set: 2:17am Moon Set: 2:33am Moon Set: 2:49am Moon Set: 3:09am Moon Set: 3:32am Moon Set: 4:03am 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Sun Rise: 5:26em Sun Rise: 5:26am Sun Rise: 5:25am Sun Rise: 5:25am Sun Rise: 5:25am Sun Rise: 5:25am Sun Rise: 5:25am Sun Set: 8:59pm Sun Set: 8:59pm Sun Set: 9:00pm Sun Set: 9:00pm Sun Set: 9:01pm Sun Set: 9:01pm Sun Set: 9:02pm Moon Rise: 9:44pm Moon Rise: 10:43pm Moon Rise: 11:30pm Moon Rise: none Moon Rise: 12:06am Moon Rise: 12:34am Moon Rise: 12:57am Moon Set: 4:45am Moon Set: 5:39am Moon Set: 6:47am Moon Set: 8:05am Moon Set: 9:26am Moon Set: 10:47am Moon Set: 12:06pm Full Moon: 12:04pm 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Sun Rise: 5:25am Sun Rise: 5:26am Sun Rise: 5:26am Sun Rise: 5:26am Sun Rise: 5:26am Sun Rise: 5:26am Sun Rise: 5:27am Sun Set: 9:02pm Sun Set: 9:02pm Sun Set: 9:03pm Sun Set: 9:03pm Sun Set: 9:03pm Sun Set: 9:03pm Sun Set: 9:03pm Moon Rise: 1:17am Moon Rise: 1:36am Moon Rise: 1:55am Moon Rise: 2:17am Moon Rise: 2:44am Moon Rise: 3:17am Moon Rise: 3:59am Moon Set: 1:23pm Moon Set: 2:39pm Moon Set: 3:57pm Moon Set: 5:15pm Moon Set: 6:33pm Moon Set: 7:47pm Moon Set: 8:54pm Last Qtr: 8:09am 25 26 27 28 29 30 Sun Rise: 5:27am Sun Rise: 5:27am Sun Rise: 5:28am Sun Rise: 5:28am Sun Rise: 5:29am Sun Rise: 5:29am Sun Set: 9:03pm Sun Set: 9:04pm_ Sun Set: 9:04pm Sun Set: 9:04pm Sun Set: 9:04pm Sun Set: 9:03pm Moon Rise: 4:52am Moon Rise: 5:55am Moon Rise: 7:03am Moon Rise- , Moon Rise: 9i21am Moon Rise: 10:26am Moon Set: 9:49pm Moon Set: 10:32pm Moon Set: 11:04pm Moon Set: 11:29pm Moon Set: 11:50pm Moon Set: none New Moon: 10:06am July 2006 Minneapolis -St. Paul. Minnesota Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 Sun Rise: 5:30am Sun Set: 9:03pm Moon Rise: 11:30am Moon Set: 12:07am 2 03 4 5 6 7 8 Sun Rise: 5:30am Sun Rise: 5:31am Sun Rise: 5:31am Sun Rise: 5:32am Sun Rise: 5:33am Sun Rise: 5:33am Sun Rise: 5:34am Sun Set: 9:03pm Sun Set: 9:03pm Sun Set: 9:03pm Sun Set: 9:02pm Sun Set: 9:02pm Sun Set: 9:02pm Sun Set: 9:01 pm Moon Rise: 12:33pm Moon Rise: 1:36pm Moon Rise: 2:41 pm Moon Rise: 3:49pm Moon Rise: 5:00pm Moon Rise: 6:13pm Moon Rise: 7:25pm Moon Set: 12:22am Moon Set: 12:38am Moon Set: 12:53am Moon Set: 1:1lam Moon Set: 1:32am Moon Set: 2:00am Moon Set: 2:36am First Qtr. 10:37am 9 010 11 12 13 14 15 Sun Rise: 5:35am Sun Rise: 5:36am Sun Rise: 5:36am Sun Rise: 5:37am Sun Rise: 5:38am Sun Rise: 5:39am Sun Rise: 5:40am Sun Set: 9:01 pm Sun Set: 9:00pm Sun Set: 9:00pm Sun Set: 8:59pm Sun Set: 8:59pm Sun Set: 8:58pm Sun Set: 8:57pm Moon Rise: 8:30pm Moon Rise: 9:23pm Moon Rise: 10:04pm Moon Rise: 10:35pm Moon Rise: 11:01 pm Moon Rise: 11:22pm Moon Rise: 11:42pm Moon Set: 3:24am Moon Set: 4:27am Moon Set: 5:43am Moon Set: 7:06am Moon Set: 8:30am Moon Set: 9:52am Moon Set: 11:12am Full Moon: 9:02pm 16 3 17 18 19 20 21 22 Sun Rise: 5:41am Sun Rise: 5:42am Sun Rise: 5:43am Sun Rise: 5:44am Sun Rise: 5:45am Sun Rise: 5:46am Sun Rise: 5:47am Sun Set: 8:57pm Sun Set: 8:56pm Sun Set: 8:55pm Sun Set: 8:54pm Sun Set: 8:53pm Sun Set: 8:53pm Sun Set: 8:52pm Moon Rise: none Moon Rise: 12:02am Moon Rise: 12:22am Moon Rise: 12:47am Moon Rise: 1:17am Moon Rise: 1:55am Moon Rise: 2:44am Moon Set: 12:30pm Moon Set: 1:47pm Moon Set: 3:05pm Moon Set: 4:22pm Moon Set: 5:37pm Moon Set: 6:46pm Moon Set: 7:44pm Last Qtr: 1:13pm 23 024 25 26 27 28 29 Sun Rise: 5:48am Sun Rise: 5:49am Sun Rise: 5:50am Sun Rise: 5:51am Sun Rise: 5:52am Sun Rise: 5:53am Sun Rise: 5:54am Sun Set: 8:51pm Sun Set: 8:50pm Sun Set: 8:49pm Sun Set: 8:48pm Sun Set: 8:47pm Sun Set: 8:45pm Sun Set: 8:44pm Moon Rise: 3:43am Moon Rise: 4:49am Moon Rise: 5:58am Moon Rise: 7:07am Moon Rise: 8:14am Moon Rise: 9:19am Moan Rise: 10:22am Moon Set: 8:30pm Moon Set: 9:05pm Moon Set: 9:32pm Moon Set: 9:54pm Moon Set: 10:12pm Moon Set: 10:28pm Moon Set: 10:43pm New Moon: 10:32pm 30 31 Sun Rise: S:SSam Sun Rise: 5:56am Sun Set: 8:43pm Sun Set: 8:42pm Moon Rise: 11:24am Moon Rise: 12:28pm Moon Set: 10:59pm Moon Set: 11:1Spm August 2006 Minneapolis -St. Paul, Minnesota Sunday Nlonday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 02 3 4 5 Sun Rise: 5:57am Sun Rise: 5:59am Sun Rise: 6:00am Sun Rise: 6:01 am Sun Rise: 6:02am Sun Set: 8:41 pm Sun Set: 8:39pm Sun Set: 8:38pm Sun Set: 8:37pm Sun Set: 8:35pm Moon Rise: 1:34pm Moon Rise: 2:43pm Moon Rise: 3:54pm Moon Rise: 5:06pm Moon Rise: 6:13pm Moon Set: 11:34pm Moon Set: 11:58pm Moon Set: none Moon Set: 12:29am Moon Set: 1:10am First Qtr. 2:46am 6 7 8 09 10 11 12 Sun Rise: 6:03am Sun Rise: 6:04am Sun Rise: 6:06am Sun Rise: 6:07am Sun Rise: 6:06am Sun Rise: 6:09am Sun Rise: 6:10am Sun Set: 8:34pm Sun Set: 8:33pm Sun Set: 8:31 pm Sun Set: 8:30pm Sun Set: 8:28pm Sun Set: 8:27pm Sun Set: 8:25pm Moon Rise: 7:11 pm Moon Rise: 7:57pm Moon Rise: 8:33pm Moon Rise: 9:01 pm Moon Rise: 9:25pm Moon Rise: 9:46pm Moon Rise: 10:06pm Moon Set: 2:06am Moon Set: 3:16am Moon Set: 4:36am Moon Set: 6:02am Moon Set: 7:27am Moon Set: 8:51am Moon Set: 10:12am Full Moon: 4:54am 13 14 315 16 17 18 19 Sun Rise: 6:1 tam Sun Rise: 6:13am Sun Rise: 6:14am Sun Rise: 6:15am Sun Rise: 6:16am Sun Rise: 6:17am Sun Rise: 6:19am Sun Set: 8:24pm Sun Set: 8:22pm Sun Set: 8:21pm Sun Set: 8:19pm Sun Set: 8:18pm Sun Set: 8:16pm Sun Set: 8:14pm Moon Rise: 10:27pm Moon Rise: 10:51 pm Moon Rise: 11:19pm Moon Rise: 11:54pm Moon Rise: none Moon Rise: 12:39am Moon Rise: 1:35am Moon Set: 11:33am Moon Set: 12:53pm Moon Set: 2:12pm Moon Set: 3:29pm Moon Set: 4:40pm Moon Set: 5:41 pm Moon Set: 6:30pm Last Qtr: 7:51pm 20 21 22 023 24 25 26 Sun Rise: 6:20am Sun Rise: 6:21am Sun Rise: 6:22am Sun Rise: 6:23am Sun Rise: 6:25am Sun Rise: 6:26am Sun Rise: 6:27am Sun Set: 8:13pm Sun Set: 8:11 pm Sun Set: 8:09pm Sun Set: 8:08pm Sun Set: 8:06pm Sun Set: 8:04pm Sun Set: 8:02pm Moon Rise: 2:39am Moon Rise: 3:47am Moon Rise: 4:56am Moon Rise: 6:03am Moon Rise: 7:09am Moon Rise: 8:12am Moon Rise: 9:15am Moon Set: 7:07pm Moon Set: 7:36pm Moon Set: 7:59pm Moon Set: 8:18pm Moon Set: 8:35pm Moon Set: 8:50pm Moon Set: 9:05pm New Moon: 1:10pm 27 28 29 30 031 Sun Rise: 6:28am Sun Rise: 6:29am Sun Rise: 6:30am Sun Rise: 6:32am Sun Rise: 6:33am Sun Set: 8:01 pm Sun Set: 7:59pm Sun Set: 7:57pm Sun Set: 7:55pm Sun Set: 7:54pm Moon Rise: 10:18am Moon Rise: 11:23am Moon Rise: 12:30pm Moon Rise: 1:40pm Moon Rise: 2:50pm Moon Set: 9:21pm Moon Set: 9:39pm Moon Set: 10:00pm Moon Set: 10:27pm Moon Set: 11:03pm First Qtr 4:57pm September 2006 Minneapolis -St. Paul, Minnesota Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 Sun Rise: 6:34am Sun Rise: 6:35am Sun Set: 7:52pm Sun Set: 7:50pm Moon Rise: 3:58pm Moon Rise: 4:58pm Moon Set: 11:50pm Moon Set: none 3 4 6 07 8 9 Sun Rise: 6:36am Sun Rise: 6:38am Sun Rise: 6:39am Sun Rise: 6:40am Sun Rise: 6:41am Sun Rise: 6:42am Sun Rise: 6:44am Sun Set: 7:48pm Sun Set: 7:46pm Sun Set: 7:44pm Sun Set: 7:43pm Sun Set: 7:41pm Sun Set: 7:39pm Sun Set: 7:37pm Moon Rise: 5:48pm Moon Rise: 6:28pm Moon Rise: 6:59pm Moon Rise: 7:24pm Moon Rise: 7:47pm Moon Rise: 8:08pm Moon Rise: 8:29pm Moon Set: 12:52am Moon Set: 2:06am Moon Set: 3:28am Moon Set: 4:54am Maon Set: 6:19am Moon Set: 7:43am Moon Set: 9:06am Full Moon: 12:43pm 10 11 12 13 CO 14 15 16 Sun Rise: 6:45am Sun Rise: 6:46am Sun Rise: 6:47am Sun Rise: 6:48am Sun Rise: 6:50am Sun Rise: 6:51 am Sun Rise: 6:52am Sun Set: 7:35pm Sun Set: 7:33pm Sun Set: 7:31pm Sun Set: 7:29pm Sun Set: 7:27pm Sun Set: 7:26pm Sun Set: 7:24pm Moon Rise: 8:52pm Moon Rise: 9:19pm Moon Rise: 9:53pm Moon Rise: 10:36pm Moon Rise: 11:29pm Moon Rise: none Moon Rise: 12:30am Moon Set: 10:29am Moon Set: 11:52am Moon Set: 1:13pm Moon Set: 2:29pm Moon Set: 3:35pm Moon Set: 4:29pm Moon Set: 5:10pm Last Qtr: 5:16am 17 18 19 20 21 922 23 Sun Rise: 6:53am Sun Rise: 6:54am Sun Rise: 6:55am Sun Rise: 6:57am Sun Rise: 6:58am Sun Rise: 6:59am Sun Rise: 7:00am Sun Set: 7:22pm Sun Set: 7:20pm Sun Set: 7:18pm Sun Set: 7:16pm Sun Set: 7:14pm Sun Set: 7:12pm Sun Set: 7:10pm Moon Rise: 1:38am Moon Rise: 2:47am Moon Rise: 3:54am Moon Rise: 5:00am Moon Rise: 6:04am Moon Rise: 7:07am Moon Rise: 8:10am Moon Set: 5:41pm Moon Set: 6:05pm Moon Set: 6:25pm Moon Set: 6:42pm Moon Set: 6:58pm Moon Set: 7:12pm Moon Set: 7:28pm New Moon: 5:46am 24 25 26 27 28 29 030 Sun Rise: 7:02am Sun Rise: 7:03am Sun Rise: 7:04am Sun Rise: 7:05am Sun Rise: 7:06am Sun Rise: 7:08am Sun Rise: 7:09am Sun Set: 7:08pm Sun Set: 7:06pm Sun Set: 7:05pm Sun Set: 7:03pm Sun Set: 7:01pm Sun Set: 6:59pm Sun Set: 6:57pm Moon Rise: 9:14am Moon Rise: 10:21am Moon Rise: 11:29am Moon Rise: 12:39pm Moon Rise: 1:47pm Moon Rise: 2:49pm Moon Rise: 3:41pm Moon Set: 7:45pm Moon Set: 8:05pm Moon Set: 8:30pm Moon Set: 9:02pm Moon Set: 9:44pm Moon Set: 10:39pm Moan Set: 11:46pm First ptc 5:04am October 2006 Minneanolis-St. Paul. Minnesota Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3 4 5 06 7 Sun Rise: 7:10am Sun Rise: 7:11 am Sun Rise: 7:13am Sun Rise: 7:14am Sun Rise: 7:15am Sun Rise: 7:16am Sun Rise: 7:18am Sun Set: 6:55pm Sun Set: 6:53pm Sun Set: 6:51 pm Sun Set: 6:49pm Sun Set: 6:48pm Sun Set: 6:46pm Sun Set: 6:44pm Moon Rise: 4:23pm Moon Rise: 4:57pm Moon Rise: 5:23pm Moon Rise: 5:46pm Moon Rise: 6:07pm Moon Rise: 6:28pm Moon Rise: 6:51 pm Moon Set: none Moon Set: 1:02am Moon Set: 2:23am Moon Set: 3:46am Moon Set: 5:09am Moon Set: 6:33am Moon Set: 7:56am Full Moon: 9:13pm 8 9 10 11 12 313 14 Sun Rise: 7:19am Sun Rise: 7:20am Sun Rise: 7:21am Sun Rise: 7:23am Sun Rise: 7:24am Sun Rise: 7:25am Sun Rise: 7:26am Sun Set: 6:42pm Sun Set: 6:40pm Sun Set: 6:38pm Sun Set: 6:37pm Sun Set: 6:35pm Sun Set: 6:33pm Sun Set: 6:31 pm Moon Rise: 7:17pm Moon Rise: 7:48pm Moon Rise: 8:29pm Moon Rise: 9:19pm Moon Rise: 10:20pm Moon Rise: 11:27pm Moon Rise: none Moon Set: 9:21 am Moon Set: 10:46am Moon Set: 12:08pm Moon Set: 1:21 pm Moon Set: 2:21pm Moon Set: 3:08pm Moon Set: 3:43pm Last Qtr: 6:26pm 15 16 17 18 19 20 021 Sun Rise: 7:28am Sun Rise: 7:29am Sun Rise: 7:30am Sun Rise: 7:32am Sun Rise: 7:33am Sun Rise: 7:34am Sun Rise: 7:36am Sun Set: 6:30pm Sun Set: 6:28pm Sun Set: 6:26pm Sun Set: 6:24pm Sun Set: 6:23pm Sun Set: 6:21pm Sun Set: 6:19pm Moon Rise: 12:37am Moon Rise: 1:45am Moon Rise: 2:51am Moon Rise: 3:56am Moon Rise: 4:59am Moon Rise: 6:01am Moon Rise: 7:05am Moon Set: 4:10pm Moon Set: 4:31 pm Moon Set: 4:49pm Moon Set: 5:05pm Moon Set: 5:20pm Moon Set: 5:35pm Moon Set: 5:52pm New Moon: 11:15pm 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Sun Rise: 7:37am Sun Rise: 7:38am Sun Rise: 7:40am Sun Rise: 7:41am Sun Rise: 7:42am Sun Rise: 7:44am Sun Rise: 7:45am Sun Set: 6:18pm Sun Set: 6:16pm Sun Set: 6:14pm Sun Set: 6:13pm Sun Set: 6:11 pm Sun Set: 6:10pm Sun Set: 6:08pm Moon Rise: 8:1 lam Moon Rise: 9:19am Moon Rise: 10:29am Moon Rise: 11:38am Moon Rise: 12:42pm Moon Rise: 1:37pm Moon Rise: 2:21pm Moon Set: 6:11 pm Moon Set: 6:34pm Moon Set: 7:04pm Moon Set: 7:43pm Moon Set: 8:33pm Moon Set: 9:36pm Moon Set: 10:48pm 30 31 29 DST Ends Sun Rise: 6:48am Sun Rise: 6:49am Sun Rise: 6:46am Sun Set: 5:05pm Sun Set: 5:04pm Sun Set: 5:07pm Moon Rise: 2:24pm Moon Rise: 2:47pm Moon Rise: 1:56pm Moon Set: none Moon Set: 12:24am Moon Set: 11:05pm First Qtr. 3:26pm November 2006 Minneanolis-St. Paul. Minnesota Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3 4 Sun Rise: 6:50am Sun Rise: 6:52am Sun Rise: 6:53am Sun Rise: 6:55am Sun Set: 5:02pm Sun Set: 5:01pm Sun Set: 4:59pm Sun Set: 4:58pm Moon Rise: 3:08pm Moon Rise: 3:28pm Moon Rise: 3:50pm Moon Rise: 4:13pm Moon Set: 1:44am Moon Set: 3:04am Moon Set: 4:25am Moon Set: 5:48am 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Sun Rise: 6:56am Sun Rise: 6:57am Sun Rise: 6:59am Sun Rise: 7:00am Sun Rise: 7:01 am Sun Rise: 7:03am Sun Rise: 7:04am Sun Set: 4:57pm Sun Set: 4:55pm Sun Set: 4:54pm Sun Set: 4:53pm Sun Set: 4:52pm Sun Set: 4:50pm Sun Set: 4:49pm Moon Rise: 4:42pm Moon Rise: 5:19pm Moon Rise: 6:06pm Moon Rise: 7:04pm Moon Rise: 8:11 pm Moon Rise: 9:22pm Moon Rise: 10:32pm Moon Set: 7:13am Moon Set: 8:37am Moon Set: 9:57am Moon Set: 11:05am Moon Set: 12:00pm Moon Set: 12:41 pm Moon Set: 1:11 pm Full Moon: 6:59am 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Sun Rise: 7:06am Sun Rise: 7:07am Sun Rise: 7:08am Sun Rise: 7:10am Sun Rise: 7:1 lam Sun Rise: 7:12am Sun Rise: 7:14am Sun Set: 4:48pm Sun Set: 4:47pm Sun Set: 4:46pm Sun Set: 4:45pm Sun Set: 4:44pm Sun Set: 4:43pm Sun Set: 4:42pm Moon Rise: 11:40pm Moon Rise: none Moon Rise: 12:46am Moon Rise: 1:49am Moon Rise: 2:51 am Moon Rise: 3:54am Moon Rise: 4:59am Moon Set: 1:35pm Moon Set: 1:54pm Moon Set: 2:11 pm Moon Set: 2:26pm Moon Set: 2:42pm Moon Set: 2:58pm Moon Set: 3:16pm Last Qtr: 11:46am 19 920 21 22 23 24 25 Sun Rise: 7:15am Sun Rise: 7:16am Sun Rise: 7:18am Sun Rise: 7:19am Sun Rise: 7:20am Sun Rise: 7:22am Sun Rise: 7:23am Sun Set: 4:41pm Sun Set: 4:40pm Sun Set: 4:39pm Sun Set: 4:38pm Sun Set: 4:38pm Sun Set: 4:37pm Sun Set: 4:36pm Moon Rise: 6:07am Moon Rise: 7:17am Moon Rise: 8:27am Moon Rise: 9:34am Moon Rise: 10:32am Moon Rise: 11:20am Moon Rise: 11:58am Moon Set: 3:38pm Moon Set: 4:06pm Moon Set: 4:42pm Moon Set: 5:29pm Moon Set: 6:29pm Moon Set: 7:39pm Moon Set: 8:55pm New Moon: 4:19pm 26 27 028 29 30 Sun Rise: 7:24am Sun Rise: 7:25am Sun Rise: 7:26am Sun Rise: 7:28am Sun Rise: 7:29am Sun Set: 4:36pm Sun Set: 4:35pm Sun Set: 4:34pm Sun Set: 4:34pm Sun Set: 4:33pm Moon Rise: 12:27pm Moon Rise: 12:52pm Moon Rise: 1:12pm Moon Rise: 1:32pm Moon Rise: 1:52pm Moon Set: 10:13pm Moon Set: 11:31pm Moon Set: none Moon Set: 12:48am Moon Set: 2:05am First Qtr. 12:30am December 2006 Minneanolis-St. Paul, Minnesota Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 Sun Rise: 7:30am Sun Rise: 7:31am Sun Set: 4:33pm Sun Set: 4:33pm Moon Rise: 2:13pm Moon Rise: 2:39pm Moon Set: 3:24am Moon Set: 4:46am 3 04 5 6 7 8 9 Sun Rise: 7:32am Sun Rise: 7:33am Sun Rise: 7:34am Sun Rise: 7:36am Sun Rise: 7:37am Sun Rise: 7:38am Sun Rlse: 7:39am Sun Set: 4:32pm Sun Set: 4:32pm Sun Set: 4:32pm Sun Set: 4:31 pm Sun Set: 4:31 pm Sun Set: 4:31 pm Sun Set: 4:31 pm Moon Rise: 3:11 pm Moon Rise: 3:53pm Moon Rise: 4:46pm Moon Rise: 5:50pm Moon Rise: 7:01pm Moon Rise: 8:14pm Moon Rise: 9:24pm Moon Set: 6:09am Moon Set: 7:30am Moon Set: 8:44am Moon Set: 9:46am Moon Set: 10:33am Moon Set: 11:09am Moon Set: 11:36am Full Moon: 6:25pm 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Sun Rise: 7:39am Sun Rise: 7:40am Rise: 7:41 am Sun Rise: 7:42am Sun Rise: 7:43am Sun Rise: 7:44am Sun Rise: 7:44amSun Set: 4:31pm Sun Set: 4:31pm [Sun n Set: 4:31pm Sun Set: 4:31pm Sun Set: 4:31 pm Sun Set: 4:31pm Sun Set: 4:32pm Moon Rise: 10:32pm Moon Rise: 11:36pm oon Rise: none Moon Rise: 12:39am Moon Rise: 1:42am Moon Rise: 2:46am Moon Rise: 3:52am Moon Set: 11:57am Moon Set: 12:15pm oon Set: 12:31 pm Moon Set: 12:46pm Moon Set: 1:02pm Moon Set: 1:19pm Moon Set: 1:40pm st Qtr: 8:32am 17 18 19 020 21 22 23 Sun Rise: 7:45am Sun Rise: 7:46am Sun Rise: 7:46am Sun Rise: 7:47am Sun Rise: 7:48am Sun Rise: 7:48am Sun Rise: 7:49am Sun Set: 4:32pm Sun Set: 4:32pm Sun Set: 4:33pm Sun Set: 4:33pm Sun Set: 4:33pm Sun Set: 4:34pm Sun Set: 4:34pm Moon Rise: 5:01am Moon Rise: 6:1 lam Moon Rise: 7:20am Moon Rise: 8:23am Moon Rise: 9:16am Moon Rise: 9:58am Moon Rise: 10:31am Moon Set: 2:05pm Moon Set: 2:38pm Moon Set: 3:22pm Moon Set: 4:18pm Moon Set: 5:27pm Moon Set: 6:43pm Moon Set: 8:02pm New Moon: 8:01am 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Sun Rise: 7:49am Sun Rise: 7:49am Sun Rise: 7:50am Sun Rise: 7:50am Sun Rise: 7:50am Sun Rise: 7:51am Sun Rise: 7:51am Sun Set: 4:35pm Sun Set: 4:36pm Sun Set: 4:36pm Sun Set: 4:37pm Sun Set: 4:38pm Sun Set: 4:38pm Sun Set: 4:39pm Moon Rise: 10:57am Moon Rise: 11:18am Moon Rise: 11:38am Moon Rise: 11:57am Moon Rise: 12:18pm Moon Rise: 12:41 pm Moon Rise: 1:09pm Moon Set: 9:21 pm Moon Set: 10:38pm Moon Set: 11:55pm Moon Set: none Moon Set: 1:12am Moon Set: 2:30am Moon Set: 3:50am First Qtr. 8:48am 31 Sun Rise: 7:51 am Sun Set: 4:40pm Moon Rise: 1:46pm Moon Set: 5:10am Ov' Document No. OFFICE OF THE A 4 410 7 4 COUNTY RECORDE R CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Fee:$ 46.00 Check#. 15736 certified Recorded on 05-12-2006 at 03:00 441074 1111111111111111111 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA HALLA GREENS- PLANNING CASE NO. 05-39 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #03-04 RESTATED AND AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DAM PM Carl W. Hanson, Jr. County Recorder 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants a conditional use permit for the following use: For the construction of a golf course with a club house in an Agricultural Estate District. 2. Property. The permit is for property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as follows: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, Block 2; and Lots 1 and 2, Block 3; Lots 1 and 2 Block 4; Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 5; Outlot A; Together with vacated Columbine Trail, vacated Hibiscus Trail; vacated Periwinkle Trail; and vacated Halla Nursery Drive West; all in the recorded plat of Halla Great Plains Addition, Carver County, Minnesota. 3. Conditions. The Conditional Use Permit 2003-4 CUP — Planning Case 05-39 is issued for the construction of a golf course with a club house as shown in plans dated received January 6, 2006, with the following conditions: a. Hours of operation shall be seasonal and limited to Civil Sunrise to Nautical Sunset. b. No outdoor speaker system shall be permitted (individual pager systems are permissible). c. No commercial kitchen shall be permitted in the club house. There shall be no cooking equipment permitted on the premises with the exception of a microwave oven, pizza/ toaster oven, etc. The intent of this condition is to put the golf course operator on notice. The proposed septic system design does not allow for any cooking grease to be disposed through the system which will cause the system to fail. d. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit is contingent upon approval of Site Plan Review #2003-07 SPR. SCANNED e. Soil tests must be performed at least once a year. Results of all soil testing must be submitted to the City of Chanhassen. In addition, annual reports detailing all applications of fertilizer (including nutrient content for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium; application rate in pounds per acre; date of application; and total quantity of fertilizer applied) must be submitted to the City of Chanhassen. No fertilizer containing phosphorus may be applied unless the soil test results demonstrate a deficiency in phosphorus. f. No grading, disturbance or dumping shall be permitted in areas designated as bluff or in bluff impact zones. Runoff from cart paths, fairways, greens or tee boxes on Hole 3 shall not be directed into bluff impact zones or bluff areas. g. On-site grading may not increase the rate or volume of runoff downstream from the site or onto adjacent properties. h. The applicant shall enter into a conditional use permit with the City. i. No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety lights which include parking lot lights, soffit lights and drive aisle lights. The height of the light poles in the parking lot and along the entrance driveway (total of five fixtures) may not exceed 15 feet. The remaining light fixtures may not exceed 4 feet in height. All light fixtures must meet ordinance requirements. All tights with the exception of the light located in the center island of the parking lot and the club house soffit lights, shall be shut off one hour after sunset. j. The applicantlowner/lessee shall apply pesticides only when needed. Use products that are most effective, target specific, and present the least hazards to people, wildlife, and the environment. k. A retail pro shop is permitted within the clubhouse. Retail operations shall not occupy more than 20% of one floor. Retail sales are limited to food, beverages, and golf -related items. 1. Hours of maintenance operation shall be limited to Civil Sunrise to Nautical Sunset. 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. 5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: March 20 2006 CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: 46 tom Furlong, Mayor (SEAL) Gerhardt, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) -jh The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this4Zday of �, 2006, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY =MEUWISSENtaM2010 DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 9:\plan\2005 planning cases\05-39 halls greens 03-07 site plan amendmentkup agreement.dac STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: Request for a Site Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit Amendment with Variances for the construction of a golf course. LOCATION: Southeast Corner of the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Pioneer Trail. APPLICANT: John Kosmas Don Halla 6rqc-. KK Design 6112 Excelsior Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 55416 (952) 922-3226 AnAkkdesign.biz Contact Person: Sandy Halla 6601 Mohawk Trail Edina, MN 55439 (952)941-8422 PRESENT ZONING: A-2, Agricultural Estate District 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential -Large Lot (2.5 Acre Minimum) 1/10 Acre Outside of MUSA ACREAGE: 45.99 acres DENSITY: N.A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: A site plan amendment for the expansion of a club house, enlarging a maintenance shed, and adding a golf ball cleaning building. Also requested is a conditional use permit amendment to add lights in the parking lot and the surrounding area. There are other requested amendments to the original conditions relating to items associated with the operation of a golf course as well as variances. Notice of the public hearing has been sent to property owners within 500 feet. Staff is recommending approval of the site plan and conditional use permit amendments with conditions and denial of the variances. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan amendment. This is a quasi judicial decision. The City has limited discretion in approving or denying conditional use permits, based on whether or not the proposal meets the conditional use permit standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City fords that all the applicable conditional use permit standards are met, the permit must be approved. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. ft"Wo 0 0 Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 2 of 18 BACKGROUND On September 15, 2003, the City Council approved Conditional Use Permit 2003-4 CUP for the construction of a golf course with a club house as shown on plans dated August 25, 2003, with the following conditions: 1. Hours of operation shall be seasonal and limited to sunrise to sunset. 2. No outdoor speaker system shall be permitted (individual pager systems are permissible). 3. No commercial kitchen shall be permitted in the club house. There shall be no cooking equipment permitted on the premises with the exception of a microwave oven, pizza/toaster oven, etc. The intent of this condition is to put the golf course operator on notice. The proposed septic system design does not allow for any cooking grease to be disposed through the system which will cause the system to fail. 4. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit is contingent upon approval of Site Plan Review 2003-7 SPR. 5. Soil tests must be performed at least once a year. Results of all soil testing must be submitted to the City of Chanhassen. In addition, annual reports detailing all applications of fertilizer (including nutrient content for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium; application rate in pounds per acre; date of application; and total quantity of fertilizer applied) must be submitted to the City of Chanhassen. No fertilizer containing phosphorus may be applied unless the soil test results demonstrate a deficiency in phosphorus. 6. No grading, disturbance or dumping shall be permitted in areas designated as bluff or in bluff impact zones. Runoff from cart paths, fairways, greens or tee boxes on Hole 3 shall not be directed into bluff impact zones or bluff areas. 7. On-site grading may not increase the rate or volume of runoff downstream from the site or onto adjacent properties. 8. The applicant shall enter into a conditional use permit with the City. 9. No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety light." The City Council also approved Site Plan Review 2003-7 SPR for the construction of a Club House and a Maintenance Building for a golf course as shown in plans dated August 25, 2003, with conditions. The City approved a 40' x 60' pre -manufactured structure club house with an outdoor patio to be built on the subject site. The main exterior material is cedar siding which is permitted by ordinance. The proposed building is manufactured by Lester Buildings. A porch is proposed at the front portion of the building and a patio is proposed south of the building. 0 0 Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 3 of 18 The above building is an example of the cedar siding building proposed by the applicant As an accessory use to this establishment, the applicant requested a 30' x 60' maintenance building. The main exterior material is proposed to be cedar siding to match the club house. The conditions of approval for Site Plan Review 2003-7 SPR for the construction of a Club House and a Maintenance Building for a golf course as shown in plans dated August 25, 2003, were as follows: Approval of the Site Plan Review application is contingent upon approval of Conditional Use Permit 2003-4 CUP. 2. All trees to be preserved must be protected by tree protection fencing. Fencing must be installed prior to grading. 3. No vegetation may be removed within the bluff impact zone. 4. The applicant shall provide a pedestrian/bikeway connection to the City's trail system at the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Pioneer Trail. 5. Fire Department Conditions: a. Please contact the Building Official and Fire Marshal to discuss the sprinklering requirements for the clubhouse and storage/maintenance building. b. If a Fire Hydrant is available, a 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Qwest, Excel Energy, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. c. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs and yellow curbing will be required. Please contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of signs and curbs to be painted yellow. d. The builder must comply with Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division regarding maximum allowable size of domestic water on a combination water/sprinkler supply line. This is only if a sprinkler is required. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division Policy #36-1994. e. The builder must comply with the Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division regarding premise identification. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention division Policy #29-1992. f. A post indicator valve will be required on any building that will have a sprinkler system. Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 4 of 18 g. Submit radius turns and dimensions to City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 6. Building Official Conditions: a. Submit a detailed floor plan of the clubhouse so the occupancy classification and fire suppression requirements can be determined. b. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. c. An accessible route must be provided to all facilities on the site. d. Submit a design of the on-site sewage treatment system for review and approval. Two sites must be provided and these sites must be protected from damage prior to beginning any construction activity on the site. The system must comply with the requirements of Minnesota Rules 7080.0600. e. Detailed occupancy related requirements cannot be reviewed until complete plans are submitted. f. The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review, permit procedures and fire suppression options. Engineering Department Conditions: a. Staff recommends that Type I silt fence be used along the northwesterly and southerly property lines. The applicant should be aware that any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. All disturbed areas are required to be restored with seed and mulch within two weeks of grading completion. b. Add the following City of Chanhassen Latest Detail Plates Numbers: 5201, 5203, 5207, 5300, and 3001 c. The applicant is responsible to obtain and comply with all regulators agency permits. d. On the grading plan add a bench mark. 8. The applicant must submit detailed architectural plans for the club house and maintenance building that meet the design ordinance requirement. 9. The applicant shall enter into a Site Plan Agreement and provide financial guarantees to insure compliance with the project. 10. Only one (1) monument sign may be permitted on the site. The total sign area shall not exceed twenty-four (24) square feet of sign display area, nor be more than five (5) feet in height. 11. The applicant is responsible to obtain and comply with a MnDOT and Carver County permit for the new access. 12. Per MnDOT's review memo, dated September 2, 2003, the need for a net along TH 101 will be evaluated upon completion of the golf course. If it is determined that a net is needed, then the applicant will be required to install it. 0 0 Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 5 of 18 13. A hydrogeologic study shall be completed on the golf course site to show that there will be no impact to the surrounding wells. 14. Comply with all conditions of the Carver County review letter dated 8/29/03. 15. Comply with all conditions of the Mn/DOT review letter dated 8/26/03." I Proposed— HAL w GglrCou�se — —, T LOCATION OF PROPOSED GOLF COURSE Construction on the golf course began approximately two years ago. The applicant has reevaluated the design of the club house along with some other accessory buildings. The main function of the golf course will not change but some of the design elements will. This report will address these changes. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is requesting a site plan and a conditional use permit amendment and a variance for the following: 0 0 Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 6 of 18 The property is zoned A-2. The site has an area of 45.99 acres and currently gains access off of Pioneer Trail. The club house is proposed to be expanded and architecturally enhanced. The main material on the exterior of the building is proposed to be vinyl siding with a simulated cedar texture design. Parking has been constructed along the north portion of the building. The parking lot will be screened from views by a combination of berms and landscaping. The applicant is proposing to add parking lot lights for safety reasons. A number of neighbors have either e-mailed or telephoned staff and expressed their opposition to parking lot lights. The city code allows lights as long as they do not exceed half a foot candle at the property line. Such lights must also be shielded. The applicant is proposing a combination of 25 -foot and 15 -foot high poles with a shielded fixture. The original plan showed the trash enclosure located west of the Maintenance Building. The enclosure was proposed to be built of cedar siding, which was the same material as that used on the building. The exterior material is proposed to be changed to ribbed metal. The zoning ordinance prohibits metal to be used as a main material on a building. Staff compared this request against the variance criteria and concluded that we must recommend denial of the use of metal as an exterior material. WAS PROPOSED Club House 40' x 60' 40'x 66' Outdoor seating 10' x 60' covered porch 13'4" x 40' screened veranda on each areas without screening and a 1,413 end of the building and a 1,000 sq ft sq ft patio patio Maintenance 30' x 60' 68' x 120' with a 24' future addition building Ball washing None Proposed 32' x 24' Ball washing building bldg. Shelter building None Proposed 16' x 40' teaching shelter building. The use was originally approved without a shelter building and as an auxiliary use to the golf course. Lighting Lights attached to the building Parking lot lights Temporary Non Proposed Request for a temporary 12' octagon structure building to serve as customer and employee building. Building Material Wood was used as an exterior Ribbed metal is proposed as the exterior (variance material for the utility building material for the maintenance building required) and ball washing building (ribbed metal is not permitted as an exterior finish on a buildin ) The property is zoned A-2. The site has an area of 45.99 acres and currently gains access off of Pioneer Trail. The club house is proposed to be expanded and architecturally enhanced. The main material on the exterior of the building is proposed to be vinyl siding with a simulated cedar texture design. Parking has been constructed along the north portion of the building. The parking lot will be screened from views by a combination of berms and landscaping. The applicant is proposing to add parking lot lights for safety reasons. A number of neighbors have either e-mailed or telephoned staff and expressed their opposition to parking lot lights. The city code allows lights as long as they do not exceed half a foot candle at the property line. Such lights must also be shielded. The applicant is proposing a combination of 25 -foot and 15 -foot high poles with a shielded fixture. The original plan showed the trash enclosure located west of the Maintenance Building. The enclosure was proposed to be built of cedar siding, which was the same material as that used on the building. The exterior material is proposed to be changed to ribbed metal. The zoning ordinance prohibits metal to be used as a main material on a building. Staff compared this request against the variance criteria and concluded that we must recommend denial of the use of metal as an exterior material. 0 0 Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 7 of 18 The original plan was approved with an identification sign. The ordinance allows monument signs not to exceed 24 square feet in area and 5 feet in height. Detailed sign plans shall be submitted for staff's review and approval. The original plan was approved to serve basket food in the club house. This amendment will not change the type of food served in the club house. The applicant is requesting operation hours be extended from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. The original approval limited operations from sunrise to sunset. The City Code limits the operation of a golf course as well as the maintenance to sunrise to sunset. Staff is recommending the hours of operation not change. A liquor license is required to serve beer on the premises. The applicant must submit a request to the City. A public hearing will be scheduled before the City Council when the application for the liquor license is received. Staff regards some of the requests as reasonable and is recommending approval of them, while others do not meet the intent of the ordinance; therefore, staff is recommending denial of them. The requested amendments that staff is recommending approval of include the site plan amendment for the expanded clubhouse, screened patio, outdoor patio, the maintenance building and golf ball washing building with conditions. Staff is recommending denial of the variance to allow metal as an exterior material on the maintenance, lean-to, and golf ball washing building. Staff is also recommending denial of the conditional use permit amendment to allow the change in hours of operation beyond sunrise to sunset. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Since this golf course was approved, the City adopted standards specific to golf courses and golf driving ranges. The general issuance standards have not changed. Golf courses and golf driving ranges are permitted as a conditional use in the Agricultural Estate District. The following constitutes our findings: GENERAL ISSUANCE STANDARDS Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or city. Finding: The proposed use will not create any significant or unexpected impacts with the incorporation of staff's conditions. The use will provide a convenient location for residents in the area to practice an outdoor activity. 2. Will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and this chapter. Finding: The proposed use is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 0 0 Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 8 of 18 3. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. Finding: The site is surrounded by highly traveled roads. The proposed use is permitted within the district as a conditional use. It will be compatible with the area. The applicant is proposing a landscape buffer around the site to minimize impacts on the residential neighborhoods to the south, west and east. 4. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. Finding: The use will provide a convenience for existing or planned neighboring uses. 5. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. Finding: Public utilities and infrastructure are not available to the site. The site will be served by a well and an Individual Septic Treatment System (ISTS). 6. Will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Finding: Staff is not aware of any excessive requirements for public facilities. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. Finding: This site will not create adverse impacts to persons, property or the general welfare of the area. The proposed use will comply with city ordinances. 8. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. Finding: The site is accessible from Pioneer Trail and lines up with Foxford Road. Both MnDOT and Carver County Public Works have submitted guidelines and recommendations to facilitate the access to the property. As a condition of approval of the original request, the applicant obtained permits from these agencies. 9. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. Finding: The site originally contained nursery stock. Many of the trees were moved. They can be seen along the borders of the property. Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 9 of 18 10. Will be aesthetically compatible with the area. Finding: The proposed use will be compatible with the area. 11. Will not depreciate surrounding property values. Finding: The use will not depreciate surrounding property values. 12. Will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in this article. Section 20-258. Golf Course a. Hours of operation shall be from sunrise to sunset. Finding: The applicant has requested the hours be extended from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. The use is surrounded by residential neighborhoods and the hours of operation should remain sensitive to the surrounding area. b. Soil must be tested to determine fertilizing requirements. If necessary, the applicant/owner/lessee shall use slow release fertilizers applied at low rates or only as needed, use natural organic fertilizers whenever possible. The use of fertilizers shall be prohibited within the flood plain. Only Phosphorous free fertilizers shall be used. Finding: Staff will add this requirement as a condition of approval to the conditional use permit. c. The applicant/owner/lessee shall apply pesticides only when needed. Use products that are most effective, target specific, and present the least hazards to people, wildlife, and the environment. Finding: Staff will add this requirement as a condition of approval to the conditional use permit. d. The applicant/owner/lessee shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, i.e. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Army Corps of Engineers and Minnesota Department of Transportation and comply with their conditions of approval. Finding: Staff will add this requirement as a condition of approval to the conditional use permit. e. Annual reports of fertilizer use shall be provided to the city. Finding: Staff will add this requirement as a condition of approval to the conditional use permit. Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 10 of 18 f. A clubhouse may be permitted on the site. The clubhouse must be shown on the site plan and must comply with all building and zoning requirements. Finding: The applicant has shown a club house on the plans. g. A retail pro shop is permitted within the clubhouse. Retail operations shall not occupy more than 20% of one floor. Retail sales are limited to food, beverages, and golf related items. Finding: Staff will add this requirement as a condition of approval to the conditional use permit. h. All maintenance and other equipment must be kept in a screened storage area. Finding: The applicant is proposing to have all equipment stored in a maintenance shed. i. The golf course must be accessed from a collector or arterial roadway. Finding: The golf course will be accessed off of Pioneer Trail. j. The site design shall minimize golf ball hazards. Finding: The applicant is required to install a net along Highway 101. k. Hours of maintenance operation shall be limited to sunrise to sunset. Finding: Staff will add this requirement as a condition of approval to the conditional use permit. 1. No outside speaker systems shall be allowed without approval from the city council. Finding: This is a requirement of the existing conditional use permit. m. A water consumption and use study must be submitted to the city for review. Finding: A study was submitted with the original application. Based upon the foregoing findings, staff is recommending that the conditional use permit amendment to allow change in hours of operation be denied. Staff is recommending approval of amending the conditional use permit to allow parking light fixtures for safety reasons. Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 11 of 18 GENERAL SITE PLAN/ARCHITECTURE The proposed buildings will be utilized as a club house, maintenance building, and golf ball washing building. The club house will have a total area of 2,640 square feet (66' x 40'). The building is proposed to utilize vinyl siding with a simulated cedar texture design. A screened porch is proposed along each end of the building and a patio along the south. The site plan for the club house is attractive and meets the requirements of the design standards. The building has a residential feel with a pronounced entrance and architectural detail (windows, doors, columns, etc.) The club house is proposed to house a pro shop, office and a cafeteria. This function was approved with the original application and nothing is changing with this request. The maintenance, golf ball washing building, and lean-to are proposed to utilize metal as the exterior material. The city code specifically prohibits the use of metal as the main exterior material on a building. The applicant must change the exterior material to a material permitted by ordinance. The maintenance building is proposed to have an area of 8,160 square feet and the golf ball washing building is proposed to have an area of 768 square feet. The lean-to is a three sided building with an area of 640 square feet and is proposed to be utilized as a shelter for the practice range. Parking for vehicles is located north of the club house. The majority of the parking lot will be screened either by landscaping or berming. The total hard surface coverage permitted by ordinance is 20%. The applicant is proposing a total hard surface coverage of 2.4%. ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE Size Portion Placement Entries The building has pronounced entrance that greets visitors and directs them to the front of the building. Articulation The building incorporates adequate detail and has been designed tastefully to fit the setting. The architectural style is unique to the building but will fit in with the surrounding area. The building will provide a variation in style through the use of the vinyl siding, dormer windows, porch and patio. The building is utilizing exterior materials that are permitted by ordinance. The maintenance buildings are hidden from views but the exterior material on the building must be changed from ribbed metal to another material permitted by ordinance. Lighting Staff is recommending that outdoor lighting be limited to residential type lights attached to the building and parking lot lights be shielded but limited to 15 feet in height. Staff is also recommending that the golf course hours of operation be limited to sunrise to sunset. Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 12 of 18 Signs A detailed sign plan is required. The sign shall meet ordinance requirements (area not to exceed 24 square feet and height not to exceed 5 feet). Material and detail High quality materials - accent material may occupy up to 15 percent of the buildings fagade. The club house building will utilize vinyl as the main material. The maintenance buildings are proposing corrugated metal as the main material which is prohibited by ordinance. This building will likely still be used as the surrounding area becomes urbanized with municipal sewer and water. Color The colors chosen for this building are earth tones. The selection is unique to the building but blends in with the surrounding buildings. This is an area agricultural in nature and staff believes that the overall chosen materials and color will fit in with the surrounding area. Height and Roof Design The building is proposed at a height of 27 feet. If the cupola is included, the height is 32 feet. The ordinance allows a maximum height of 35 feet. The porch along the sides of the building and the entire redesign of this building meets the design criteria dealing with pitched elements. Facade transparency All facades viewed by the public contain more than 50 percent windows and doors. All other areas will be landscaped. Site Furnishing The applicant has provided an outdoor seating area; however, the furniture has not been shown on the plans. The plans must be modified to show the chairs and tables. Loading areas/refuse area, etc. The trash enclosure is not shown on the plans. The original plans showed the enclosure next to the maintenance building. If there are any changes to this element, is should be shown on the plans. The exterior material of the trash enclosure must match the proposed building's exterior material. Landscaping The site is fairly level. The landscaping plan will provide a variety of plant materials that are massed where possible. The berms and landscaping materials will be continuous along the perimeter of the site. The plant materials are repetitious in some locations and variable in others. Proposed plant materials are indigenous to Minnesota. Staff is recommending additional landscaping to meet minimum ordinance requirements. Lot Frontage and Parking location The site is located at the southeast intersection of Pioneer Trail and Great Plains Boulevard. The parking will be screened by berming and landscaping to meet ordinance requirements. • 0 Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 13 of 18 SUE PLAN FINDINGS In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: (1) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (2) Consistency with this division; (3) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; (4) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; (5) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; C. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the comprehensive plan. There are areas that are in violation of the zoning ordinance. These areas will be corrected through the conditions of approval. The site design is compatible with the surrounding developments. It is functional and harmonious with the approved development for this area. Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 14 of 18 Staff regards the project as a reasonable use of the land. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan with conditions outlined in the staff report. MISCELLANEOUS Soil tests should be performed at least once a year. Results of all soil testing should be submitted to the City of Chanhassen. In addition, annual reports detailing all applications of fertilizer (including nutrient content for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium; application rate in pounds per acre; date of application; and total quantity of fertilizer applied) should be submitted to the City of Chanhassen. No fertilizer containing phosphorus should be applied unless the soil test results demonstrate a deficiency in phosphorus. Also, on-site grading should not increase the rate or volume of runoff downstream from the site or onto adjacent properties. Staff is recommending the request for a temporary 12 -foot octagon building to serve as customer and employee building be approved. The structure will be removed as soon as the club house has received a certificate of occupancy. Staff is recommending that the temporary building be permitted for a maximum on 12 months or when the certificate of occupancy for the club house has been issued, whichever comes first. SIGNAGE Section 20-1301 of the sign ordinance allows non-residential use in Agricultural Estate Districts to have only one (1) monument sign on the site. The total sign area shall not exceed twenty-four (24) square feet of sign display area, nor be more than five (5) feet in height. PARKING The ordinance requires 20 parking spaces plus 1 space for each 500 square feet of floor area in the principal structure. The total parking spaces required are 25 spaces. The applicant is proposing 104 parking spaces. BLUFF No grading, disturbance or dumping is permitted in areas designated as bluff or in bluff impact zones. Runoff from cart paths, fairways, greens or tee boxes on Hole 3 should not be directed into bluff impact zones or bluff areas. WETLANDS No wetlands exist on site. 0 0 Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 15 of 18 LANDSCAPING Minimum requirements for landscaping include 2,860 square feet of landscaped area around the parking lot, 11 trees for the parking lot, and bufferyard plantings along Pioneer Trail. The applicant's proposed landscape as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table: The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for parking lot landscape plantings. Staff recommends that totals for landscaping be increased in order to meet minimum requirements as shown in the table. Additionally, according to ordinance, parking lots shall be fully screened from the street. This will require berming or more understory trees and shrubs to be planted along the street frontages. COMPLIANCE TABLE — A2 DISTRICT Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 2,860 sq. ft. >2,860 sq. ft. Trees/landscape area 11 canopy trees 0 canopy trees Lot Depth 6 islands/peninsulas 6 islands/peninsulas Pioneer Trail 11 canopy trees 108 canopy bufferyard B —1140' 23 understory trees 22 understory (applicant's ldscp is 50' in 23 shrubs 61 shrubs width) N-50' S-10' E - 50' W - 10' N - 110' S - 500' E - 260' W - 270' The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for parking lot landscape plantings. Staff recommends that totals for landscaping be increased in order to meet minimum requirements as shown in the table. Additionally, according to ordinance, parking lots shall be fully screened from the street. This will require berming or more understory trees and shrubs to be planted along the street frontages. COMPLIANCE TABLE — A2 DISTRICT VARIANCE The applicant is requesting several variances including corrugated metal to be used as the exterior material of the maintenance buildings, and allowing the golf course to be open from 6:00 am. to 11:00 p.m. when the ordinance requires hours of operation to be limited to sunrise to sunset. FINDINGS The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts: Ordinance Short Course Total Lot Area 10 Acres 45.99 Acres Lot Frontage 200' 1215' Lot Depth 200' 1170' Lot Coverage 20% 2.4% Total Parking Stalls 25 104 Building Height 1 story 1 story Building Setback N-50' S-10' E - 50' W - 10' N - 110' S - 500' E - 260' W - 270' VARIANCE The applicant is requesting several variances including corrugated metal to be used as the exterior material of the maintenance buildings, and allowing the golf course to be open from 6:00 am. to 11:00 p.m. when the ordinance requires hours of operation to be limited to sunrise to sunset. FINDINGS The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts: i 0 Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 16 of 18 a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing downward from them meet these criteria. Finding: The literal enforcement of this chapter does not cause an undue hardship. The applicant has reasonable use of the property. The site did receive a conditional use permit to operate as a golf course. Hours of operation of sunrise to sunset are reasonable. The exterior material of the maintenance buildings can be changed to meet ordinance requirements. b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. Finding: The conditions upon which this variance is based are applicable to all properties that lie within the Agricultural Estate District. C. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. Finding: Extending the hours of operation will increase the value of the property. d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship. Finding: The applicant can meet the requirements of the ordinance. The fact that a choice has been made to use exterior materials that are prohibited by ordinance is a self-created hardship. The use of the building, while now agricultural, will be surrounded by urbanized land uses as urban services are provided. e. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. Finding: The granting of a variance to allow extended hours of operations may prove to be an annoyance to other land in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. f. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Finding: The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets. 0 0 Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 17 of 18 RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the following motions: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT "The City Council approve an amendment to Conditional Use Permit 2003-4 CUP — Planning Case 05-39, for the construction of a golf course with a club house as shown in plans dated received January 6, 2006, with the following amendment to condition #9 of the existing conditional use Pen -nit: 9. No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety lights which includes parking lot lights and drive isle lights. The height of the light pole may not exceed 15 feet. All light fixtures must meet ordinance requirements." SITE PLAN REVIEW "The City Council approve an amendment to Site Plan Review 2003-7 SPR — Planning Case 05- 39, for the construction of a Club House, a Maintenance Building, a golf ball washing building and a lean-to for a golf course as shown in plans dated received January 6, 2006, with the following added conditions: 1. Applicant shall increase landscape plantings to meet minimum requirements for parking lot trees. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the City prior to city council approval. 2. Applicant shall fully screen parking lots from adjacent roadways through the use of berming or increased landscaping. 3. The applicant must submit detailed architectural plans for the maintenance building, golf ball washing building, and lean-to that meet the design ordinance requirement. 4. Comply with all conditions of the MnDOT review letter dated November 23, 2005. 5. The temporary 120 square -foot octagon building is permitted for a maximum of 12 months from the day the City Council approves this application or when the certificate of occupancy for the club house has been issued, whichever comes first. 6. The applicant is responsible for obtaining and complying with MnDOT and Carver County permits and approval on any grading that takes place along the north and west side of the property- 7. roperty 7. All disturbed areas are required to be restored with seed and mulch within two weeks of grading completion. 8. All plans must be signed by a professional civil engineer registered in the State of Minnesota." Planning Commission Halla Greens — Planning Case No. 05-39 February 7, 2006 Page 18 of 18 VARIANCE "The City Council denies Variance — Planning Case 05-39, for corrugated metal to be used as the exterior material of the maintenance and golf ball washing buildings, and allowing the golf course to be open from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. based upon the findings in the staff report and the following: 1. The applicant has not demonstrated a hardship. 2. The property owner has reasonable use of the property." ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 2. Application. 3. Revised narrative dated January 6, 2006. 4. E -Mail from David and Sharon Gatto dated December 19, 2005. 5. E -Mail from Elaine Sievers dated December 29, 2005. 6. E -Mail from Cindy and Don Deal dated December 27, 2005. 7. E -Mail from June Ebrahim dated December 27, 2005. 8. E -Mail from Bill O'Neil dated December 23, 2005. 9. Letter dated November 8, 2005, updated December 20, 2005, waiving the 120 days. 10. Letter from MnDOT dated November 23, 2005. 11. Letter from Geneva & Jeff Sorum dated 1/25/06. 12. Plans dated August 26, 2003. 13. Public Hearing notice and property owners list within 500 feet. 9:\plan\2005 planning cases\05-39 halls greens 03-07 site plan amendmenAstatrreporuloc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of John Kosmas and Don Halla requesting a Site Plan Amendment and conditional use permit amendment with variances for the construction of a golf course: HALLA GREENS — Planning Case No. 05-39. On February 7, 2006, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of John Kosmas and Don Halla for a conditional use permit with variances and site plan amendment with variances for the property located at the southeast comer of the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and Pioneer Trail. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed conditional use which was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Agricultural Estate District, A2. 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Residential — Large Lot. 3. The legal description of the property is: The NE '/ of the SW '/, of Section 25, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota. 4. The Planning Commission shall recommend a conditional use permit and the City Council shall issue such conditional use permit only if it finds that such use at the proposed location: a. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or city. Finding: The proposed use will not create any significant or unexpected impacts with the incorporation of staff s conditions. The use will provide a convenient location for residents in the area to practice an outdoor activity. b. Will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and the zoning chapter. Finding: The proposed use is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan. c. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. 0 0 Finding: The site is surrounded by highly traveled roads. The proposed use is permitted within the district as a conditional use. It will be compatible with the area. The applicant is proposing a landscape buffer around the site to minimize impacts on the residential neighborhoods to the south, west and east. d. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. Finding: The use will provide a convenience for existing or planned neighboring uses. e. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. Finding: Public utilities and infrastructure are not available to the site. The site will be served by a well and an Individual Septic Treatment System (ISTS). f. Will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Finding: Staff is not aware of any excessive requirements for public facilities. g. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. Finding: This site will not create adverse impacts to persons, property or the general welfare of the area. The proposed use will comply with city ordinances. h. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. Finding: The site is accessible from Pioneer Trail and lines up with Foxford Road. Both MnDOT and Carver County Public Works have submitted guidelines and recommendations to facilitate the access to the property. As a condition of approval of the original request, the applicant obtained permits from these agencies. i. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. Finding: The site originally contained nursery stock. Many of the trees were moved. They can be seen along the borders of the property. Will be aesthetically compatible with the area. Finding: The proposed use will be compatible with the area. • 0 k. Will not depreciate surrounding property values. Finding The use will not depreciate surrounding property values. 1. Will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in Chapter 20, Article IV of the Chanhassen City Code. Finding: The proposed use will be required to meet the standards specified for golf courses in the Chanhassen City Code. 5. In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: a. Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; b. Consistency with this division; c. Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; d. Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; e. Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community, 2. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; 3. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and 4. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. f. Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and L� • those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the comprehensive plan. There are areas that are in violation of the zoning ordinance. These areas will be corrected through the conditions of approval. The site design is compatible with the surrounding developments. It is functional and harmonious with the approved development for this area. 6. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts: a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing downward from them meet these criteria. Finding: The literal enforcement of this chapter does not cause an undue hardship. The applicant has reasonable use of the property. The site did receive a conditional use permit to operate as a golf course. Hours of operation of sunrise to sunset are reasonable. The exterior material of the maintenance buildings can be changed to meet ordinance requirements. b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. Finding: The conditions upon which this variance is based are applicable to all properties that lie within the Agricultural Estate District. c. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. Finding: Extending the hours of operation will increase the value of the property. d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship. Finding: The applicant can meet the requirements of the ordinance. The fact that a choice has been made to use exterior materials that are prohibited by ordinance is a self-created hardship. e. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. Ell Finding: The granting of a variance to allow extended hours of operations may prove to be an annoyance to other land in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. f. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Finding: The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets. 7. The planning report #05-39 dated February 7, 2006, prepared by Sharmeen Al-Jaff, et al, is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the site plan and conditional use permit amendments, but deny the variance requests. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 7th day of February, 2006. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION Its Chairman m Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville MN 55113-3174 November 23, 2005 Ms. Kate Aanenson Community Development Director City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Boz 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Subject: Halla Greens Minnesota Department of Transportation (4n/DO'1) Review # S 05-103 Southeast quadrant of Trunk Highway (M 101 and Pioneer Trail (CSAH 14) Chanhassen/ Carver County TH 101 Mn/DOT Control Section # 1009 Dear Ms. Aanenson: The Mn/DOT Metro District has reviewed the -above referenced site plan. The following comments need to be addressed in addition to the comments from our letters dated August 26, 2003, and September 2, 2003 (enclosed). Area Engineer comments: • Please provide additional information on the intent of the proposed modifications to the existing gravel driveway, and the use of the existing gravel driveway at the south end of the site plan, off of TH 101. It is not possible to determine from the plans submitted whether the existing gravel driveway has been moved to be located opposite from Halla Nursery Drive, as shown in the 2003 plan. Please provide additional information concerning the location of the gravel driveway. The site plan is not clear on the access point from TH 101. The gravel road appears to have a possible connection to the golf course property. If Halla Greens is using the gravel access road, they must apply for a Mn/DOT access permit. For questions on these points, please call Lynn Clarkowski, Mn/DOT Metro District South Area Engineer, at (651) 634-2103. Pight of Way 0j)7Ice comments: We are enclosing a copy of Mn/DOT right of way plat number 10-34 for your information. The developer needs to refer to this plat in site plans and other related drawings, so that Mn/DOT's existing right of way is accurately identified and labeled. The site plan submitted to Mn/DOT appears to show the Mn/DOT right of way as it existed prior to the construction of State Project SP # 1009-14. Mn/DOT's right of way is now one hundred twenty (120) feet wide along TH 101 for a distance. There is also a "sight comer" that has been taken by Mn/DOT via condemnation on the southeast comer of TH 101 and CSAH 14. In addition, please depict Mn/DOT access control with appropriate symbolization. For questions on these points, please call Lee Williams, Mn/DOT Metro District Right of Way Office, at (651) 582-1275 M eaual ooaortunity emdover Water Resources Engineering comments: A Mn/DOT drainage permit shall be required. A grading plan depicting the correct right- of-way lines is needed. The City or project developer will need to submit beforetafter hydraulic computations for the 100 year rainfall event verifying that all existing drainage patterns and systems affecting Mn/DOT right of way will be perpetuated. In addition, please submit information documenting the performance of the pond located at the northeast comer of the golf course. Drainage runoff rates to MWDOT right of way for the proposed condition must not increase over the existing condition, and drainage patterns must not change. For questions on these points, please call Bryce Fossand, at Mn/DOT Metro District Water Resources Engineering, at (651) 634-2408. Traffic Engineering comments: A Right Tum Lane, on Pioneer Trail, for the new access, should be constructed. This is especially important with the traffic signal at TH 101/Pioneer Trail. For questions on these points, please call Lars Impola, Mn/DOT Metro District Traffic Engineering, at (651) 634-2379. Design comments: For liability reasons, steps should be taken to insure that errant golf balls do not enter the TH 101 right of way, or the TH 101 driving/turning lanes. For questions on these points, please call Ken Ljung, Mn/DOT Metro District Design Office at (651) 634-2113. Permits comments: The berm has been constructed on Mn/DOT nghtof-way and needs to be removed. Mn/DOT has had major drainage problems (flooding) on TH 101 due to this berm. A drainage permit is required. Any use of or work within or affecting Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us//utility. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. County State Aid Highway (CSAR) comments: As a reminder, CSAH 14 is a County State Aid Highway (CSAH) Route. Any work on a CSAH route must meet State Aid rules and policies. ➢ ho://www.dot.state.mn.us/stateaid/ shows or has links to the applicable forms and the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual. ➢ Refer to the Mn WT State Aid Manual, Chapter 5-892.200 for information regarding standards and policies. ➢ Please go to bttp://www.revisor.leg.state.nm.us/arul&8820/ for information regarding State Aid Operations Rules Chapter 8820. ➢ For driveway standards, the designer is directed to refer to the Mn/DOT Road Design Manual (English) Table 5-3.04A and Figure 5-3.04A for guidance and policies. Please contact Jim Deeny in our State Aid section at (651) 582-1389 with any additional questions. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Review Coordinator Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mu DOT's 30 -day review and response process to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 651-582-1462. Sincerely, Mary McNeff Transportation Planner Enclosures — MrVMT right of way plat No. 10-34 Mn/DOT letter dated August 26, 2003 Mn/DOT letter dated September 2, 2003 cc: John Freemyer, Carver County Surveyor Roger Gustafson, Carver County Engineer Kevin Norby, Herfort Norby Golf Course Architects, Eden Prairie, MN Blind copy via Groupwise: Tod Sherman Cindy Carlsson Lars Impola Lynn Clarkowski Bryce Fossand Ann Braden Blind copy via Groupwise, continued: Ken Ljung Lee Williams John Isackson Buck Craig Blind file copy to: �Mn/DOT LGL file: Chanhassen/Carver County Mn/DOT Divison file: CS 1009 Roger Gustafson Carver County Engineer 11360 Highway 212 West P.O. Box 300 Cologne, MN 55322-0300 John Fre=yer Carver County Surveyor 600 East 4m Street Chaska, MN 55318 Kevin Norby Hefort Norby Golf Course Architects 6452 City West Parkway Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Stormwater Quality and Quantity Report for CHANHASSEN SHORT COURSE Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared on July 18, 2003 Revised July 28, 2003 October 10, 2005 Prepared for Halla Nursery Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. 150 South Broadway Wayzata, MN 55371 CITY OF RECEIVED SSEN OCT 1 7 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Contact: Daniel L. Schmidt, P.E. (phone) (952) 476-6000 (fax) (952) 476-0104 http://www.sathre.com I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. { ��y 150 SOUTH BROADWAY, WAYZATA, MN 55391 ♦ (952) 476-6000 s Date 10 /O r7S Reg. No. Z6151? Stornmater Qualityand Quantity Management Plan Chanhassen Short Course — Proposed Golf Course Is Chanhassen, Minnesota STORMWATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR CHANHASSEN SHORT COURSE Chanhassen, Minnesota PREPARED FOR Halla Nursery PREPARED BY • Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. 150 South Broadway Wayzata, MN 55391 July 18, 2003 Revised: July 28, 2003 Revised: October 9, 2005 40 Stormwater Quality and Quantity Report for CHANHASSEN SHORT COURSE Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared on July 18, 2003 Revised July 28, 2003 October 10, 2005 Prepared for Halla Nursery Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. 150 South Broadway Wayzata, MN 55371 Contact: Daniel L. Schmidt, P.E. (phone) (952) 476-6000 (fax) (952) 476-0104 http://www.sathre.com I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. N SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 1 150 SOI�Ti;I BROADWAY, WAYZATA, MN 55391 ♦ (952) 476-6000 PV. , J Date /0 /O r7S Reg. No. 2-61Y? Stormwater Quality and Quantity Management Plan Chanhassen Short Course- Proposed Golf Course Chanhassen, Minnesota • STORMWATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR CHANHASSEN SHORT COURSE Chanhassen, Minnesota PREPARED FOR SMG INC. PREPARED BY • Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. 150 South Broadway Wayzata, MN 55391 July 18, 2003 Revised: July 28, 2003 Revised: October 9, 2005 n U • E 0 Stormwater Quality and Quantity Management Plan Chanhassen Short Course — Proposed Golf Course Chanhassen, Minnesota SUO` V, W SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY, WAYZATA, MN 55381 ♦ (612) 476-6000 TABLE OF CONTENTS DRAINAGE DESIGN SUMMARY Introduction Methodology Hydrograph descriptions Summary Introduction Tabulated Routing Summary Outlet Structure Data FIGURES Existing Drainage Map (sleeve) Proposed Drainage Map Plan (sleeve) • • 0 Stornncater Quality and Quantity Management Plan Chanhassen Short Course — Proposed Golf Course Chanhassen, Minnesota INTRODUCTION The parameters of the routing calculations are as follows. Manning's n prairie grass (existing) = .15, Bermuda grass .41, concrete pipe = .013, PVC pipe 0.010 Utilizing the Storage Indication Method Cn = 66 for Rural and Estate Residential as per page 111-3 of City of Chanhassen Surface Water Management Plan Cn = 69 for Golf Courses as per the TR -55 manual The existing drainage areas are shown on page 1 for the Chanhassen Short Course. The existing drainage consists of four different drainage areas. Existing Drainage Area #1 consists of the northeasterly comer of the property that drains to an existing 24" culvert. Existing Drainage Area #2 drains the northwest comer of the property to an existing 18"culvert. Existing Drainage Area #3 consists of the majority of the site and drains to an existing pond and large drainage swale. Drainage area #4 consists of a small area that drains to the southwest. The proposed drainage areas are shown on page 2 for the proposed development. The proposed drainage areas have 4 sub areas that correspond with the four existing drainage areas. The correlation with the existing and proposed drainage areas are shown in the chart below: Proposed Drainage Area #1 Proposed Drainage Area #2,#5 Proposed Drainage Area #3 Proposed Drainage Area #4 Existing Drainage Area #1 Existing Drainage Area #2 Existing Drainage Area #3 Existing Drainage Area #4 The outlet for Pond #1 will be the existing 24" culvert that goes under the existing C.S.A.H. #14 The outlet for Pond #2 will be a 4' diameter outlet structure with 20 feet of 18"RCP that will overflow to the existing 18" culvert at the northwest comer of the site. Pond #3 will not have any outlet other than the proposed irrigation. METHODOLOGY The watersheds in question were modeled using techniques and data found in the following: 1. Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds — Technical Release 55 by the United States Department of Agriculture Soils Conservation Service, June 1986. Curve numbers, Hydrologic Soils Groups, and 24 hr. precipitation values were obtained from this reference in addition to Time of Concentrations. Stormwater Quality and Quantity Management Plan Chanhassen Short Course - Proposed Golf Course 116 Chanhassen, Minnesota 2. AutoCAD Land Development Desktop 2000i by AutoDesk. This program was used to generate runoff hydrographs for watershed areas, to determine discharge/stage/storage characteristics for the NURP ponds, and to perform flood routing and to combine the results of runoff hydrographs. 3. Rational Method pipe sizing based on the method contained in ASCE Manual and Reports of Engineering Practice # 37 — Design and Construction of Sanitary Sewers and Storm Drains, by the American Society of Civil Engineers and the Water Pollution Control Federation, 1970. The Mannings formula was used for determining pipe capacities. r� 16—J 0 Stormater Quality and Quantity Management Plan Chanhassen Short Course — Proposed Golf Coursc Chanhassen, Minnesota Hydrograph Descriptions (see report for details): Hydrograph 1 — Existing Drainage for Existing Drainage Area #1. Hydrograph 2 — Existing Drainage for Existing Drainage Area #2. Hydrograph 3 — Existing Drainage for Existing Drainage Area #3. Hydrograph 4 — Existing Drainage for Existing Drainage Area #4. Hydrograph 5 — Proposed Drainage for Proposed Drainage Area #1. Hydrograph 6 — Hydrograph #5 routed through Pond #1 Hydrograph 7 — Proposed Drainage for Proposed Drainage Area #2. • Hydrograph 8 — Hydrograph # 7 as routed through Pond #2. Hydrograph 9 — Proposed Drainage for Proposed Drainage Area #4. Hydrograph 10 — Proposed Drainage for Proposed Drainage Area #3. Hydrograph 11 — Proposed Road Runoff for Proposed Drainage Area #5. Hydrograph 12 — Combination of Hydrograph #11 and #8. Hydrograph 13 — Hydrograph #12 as routed through the existing 18" Culvert. Stormcater Quality and Quantity Management Plan Chanhassen Short Course — Proposed Golf Course is Chanhassen, Minnesota Summary Storm Water Ouantity Management: The proposed drainage will be restricted to a rate less than the existing condition for 10 and 100 year storm as shown in the following table: 10YEAR Proposed Drainage Area CFS Existing Drainage Area CFS P.D.A. #1 (Pond 9.40 E. D. A. #1 11.29 P.D.A. #2 (Pond 2 Routed) 4.74 E. D. A. #2 7.66 P.D.A. #3 19.70 E. D. A. #3 30.39 P.D.A. #4 2.49 E. D. A. #4 2.46 • 100 YEAR Proposed Drainage Area CFS Existing Drainage Area CFS P.D.A. #1 10.81 E. D. A. #1 24.19 P.D.A.#2(Pond 2 Routed) 13.32 E. D. A. #2 16.63 P.D.A.#3 40.31 E. D. A. #3 65.12 P.D.A. #4 5.10 E. D. A. #4 5.24 Dead Storage Reauirement (NURP) Dead storage was only calculated on Pond #2 for Proposed Drainage Area #2 because this area is the only one with an increase in hardcover. The required "NURP" is 0.57 acre feet. The provided "NURP" is 1.07 acre feet. The mean depth of Pond 2 is 3.87 feet. See calculations in the enclosed NURP Calculations section. 0 Stormwater Quality and Quantity Management Plan Chanhassen Short Course — Proposed Golf Course • Chanhassen, Minnesota Tabulated Routing Summary's 0 Hydrograph Return Period Recap ' vd. Hydrograph Inflow Peak Outflow (cfs) Hydrograph type Hyd(s) description (origin) 1 -Yr 2 -Yr 3 -Yr 5 -Yr 10 -Yr 25 -Yr 50 -Yr 100 -Yr 1 SCS Runoff ---- --- -- ----- ---- 11.29 --- --- 24.19 EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #1 2 SCS Runoff -- --- --- -- --- 7.66 --- -- 16.63 EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #2 3 SCS Runoff -- ---- -- -- --• 30.39 --- 65.12 EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #3 4 SCS Runoff —• ----- --- ---- ----- 2.46 -- 5.28 EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #4 5 SCS Runoff -- ---- --•— -- -- 9.40 ---- •-- 18.90 PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #1 6 Reservoir 5 ---- ---- ---- ---- 4.54 ---- ----- 10.81 POND 1 ROUTED 7 SCS Runoff --- — -- 11.17 ------ 20.96 PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #2 8 Reservoir 7 ----- ----- — ---- 8.34 •----- ---- 13.94 POND 2 ROUTED 9 SCS Runoff -- -- ---- -- ---- 2.49 --- --- 5.10 PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #4 10 SCS Runoff -- ---- --- --- 19.69 ---- --- 40.31 PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #3 11 SCS Runoff ---- --- -- -- -- 2.42 ---- --- 4.59 DRAINAGE AREA #5 12 Combine 8,11 ----- -- 5.79 -- --- 13.32 Discharge to RCP at NW Corner 13 Reservoir 12 ----- ----- 4.74 -- -- 10.97 <no description> Proj. file: STORM 10 12 05.gpw Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM Hydraflow Hydrographs by Inteiisolve Hydrograph Summary Report HydraBow Hydrographs by Intellsolve Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to peak (min) Volume (tuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Maximum storage (cuk) Hydrograph description 1 SCS Runoff 11.29 6 732 50,008 -- ------ --- EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #1 2 SCS Runoff 7.66 6 738 42,305 — ----- --- EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #2 3 SCS Runoff 30.39 6 732 134,597 -- ----- --- EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #3 4 SCS Runoff 2.46 6 732 10,913 -- ---- ---- EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #4 5 SCS Runoff 9.40 6 732 40,356 — --- --- PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #1 6 Reservoir 4.54 6 750 40,335 5 903.91 12,281 POND 1 ROUTED 7 SCS Runoff 11.17 6 756 84,765 — -- PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #2 8 Reservoir 8.34 6 786 84,744 7 907.60 21,875 POND 2 ROUTED 9 SCS Runoff 2.49 6 750 17,361 — -- -- PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #4 10 SCS Runoff 19.69 6 750 137,312 — --- -- PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #3 11 SCS Runoff 2.42 6 744 14,029 — -- DRAINAGE AREA #5 12 Combine 5.79 6 786 72,989 8.11 -- Discharge to RCP at NW Comer 13 Reservoir 4.74 6 810 72,968 12 903.93 12,573 <no description> • STORM 10 U 05.gpw Return Period: 10 Year Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM HydraBow Hydrographs by Intellsolve Hydrograph Summary Report Hydre6ow Hyorographs by Intelisolve Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to peak (min) Volume (euft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Maximum storage (tuft) Hydrograph description 1 SCS Runoff 24.19 6 732 101,069 — -- --- EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #1 2 SCS Runoff 16.63 6 738 85,502 -- --- ---- EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #2 3 SCS Runoff 65.12 6 732 272,028 — -- EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #3 4 SCS Runoff 5.28 6 732 22,056 — -- --- EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #4 5 SCS Runoff 18.90 6 732 78,280 -- -- PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #1 6 Reservoir 10.81 6 744 78,259 5 904.52 22,361 POND 1 ROUTED 7 SCS Runoff 20.96 6 756 154,743 — — PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #2 8 Reservoir 13.94 6 786 154,722 7 908.62 38,082 POND 2 ROUTED 9 SCS Runoff 5.10 6 750 33,675 — — --- PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #4 10 SCS Runoff 40.31 6 750 266,349 -- -- --- PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #3 11 SCS Runoff 4.59 6 744 25,907 — — -- DRAINAGE AREA #5 12 Combine 13.32 6 768 133,559 8.11 --- -- Discharge to RCP at NW Comer 13 Reservoir 10.97 6 798 133,538 12 904.54 22,622 <no descripbon> • i STORM 10 12 05.gpw Return Period: 100 Year Wednesday, Oct 12 2005,6:55 PM Hydre6ow Hyorographs by Intelisolve Stormwater Quality and Quantity Management Plan • Chanhassen Short Course — Proposed Golf Course Chanhassen, Minnesota 10 YEAR HYDROGRAPHS 0 Hydrograph Report Hydrallow Hydrographs by Intelisolve •Hyd. No. 1 EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #1 Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. Storm duration = SCS Runoff = 10 yrs = 11.41 ac = 0.0% = TR55 = 4.20 in = 24 hrs Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs cfs) 11.80 1.41 12.10 10.68 12.40 7.80 12.70 2.70 13.00 1.91 13.30 1.56 •13.60 1.33 13.90 1.16 14.20 1.02 14.50 0.94 14.80 0.89 15.10 0.84 15.40 0.79 15.70 0.74 16.00 0.68 16.30 0.64 16.60 0.61 16.90 0.60 17.20 0.58 ... End Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM Peak discharge = 11.29 cfs Time interval = 6 min Curve number = 66 Hydraulic length = Oft Time of conc. (Tc) = 29.3 min Distribution = Type II Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume = 50,008 cult ( PoPted values - 5% of OV Pont imerval = 3) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve • Hyd. No. 2 EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #2 Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. Storm duration = SCS Runoff = 10 yrs = 9.36 ac = 0.0% = TR55 = 4.20 in = 24 hrs Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs cfs) 11.80 0.68 12.10 5.66 12.40 7.07 12.70 4.44 13.00 1.92 13.30 1.45 •13.60 1.21 13.90 1.05 14.20 0.92 14.50 0.82 14.60 0.77 15.10 0.73 15.40 0.68 15.70 0.64 16.00 0.60 16.30 0.56 16.60 0.53 16.90 0.51 17.20 0.50 17.50 0.48 17.80 0.46 18.10 0.45 18.40 0.43 18.70 0.42 19.00 0.40 19.30 0.38 ..End 0 Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM Peak discharge = 7.66 cfs Time interval = 6 min Curve number = 66 Hydraulic length = Oft Time of conc. (Tc) = 35.8 min Distribution = Type II Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume = 42,305 cuff (Pnnw YeW -5%d Op NN in(e &l=3) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve •Hyd. No. 3 EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #3 Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. Storm duration = SCS Runoff = 10 yrs = 30.71 ac = 5.0% = TR55 = 4.20 in = 24 hrs Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs cfs) 11.80 3.81 12.10 28.75 12.40 20.99 12.70 7.27 13.00 5.14 Shape factor 4.19 •13.30 13.60 3.59 13.90 3.13 14.20 2.75 14.50 2.52 14.80 2.38 15.10 2.25 15.40 2.12 15.70 1.98 16.00 1.84 16.30 1.72 16.60 1.65 16.90 1.60 17.20 1.55 ...End 0 Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM Peak discharge = 30.39 cfs Time interval = 6 min Curve number = 66 Hydraulic length = Oft Time of conc. (Tc) = 25.4 min Distribution = Type II Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume = 134,597 cuR (Nnt0 velum -5%M Op. FIM inl g=3) Hydrograph Report Hydrallow Hydrographs by Intelisolve • Hyd. No. 4 71t.�1ZHI\d=► Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. Storm duration = SCS Runoff = 10 yrs = 2.49 ac = 0.0% = TR55 = 4.20 in = 24 hrs Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs cfs) 11.80 0.31 12.10 2.33 12.40 1.70 12.70 0.59 13.00 0.42 13.30 0.34 .13.60 0.29 13.90 0.25 14.20 0.22 14.50 0.20 14.80 0.19 15.10 0.18 15.40 0.17 15.70 0.16 16.00 0.15 16.30 0.14 16.60 0.13 16.90 0.13 17.20 0.13 ... End is Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM Peak discharge = 2.46 cfs Time interval = 6 min Curve number = 66 Hydraulic length = Oft Time of conc. (Tc) = 26.1 min Distribution = Type II Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume = 10,913 cult r M; valves>-s%d oo. NM,mK - 3) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve •Hyd. No. 5 PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #1 Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. Storm duration = SCS Runoff = 10 yrs = 7.95 ac = 0.0% = TR55 = 4.20 in = 24 hrs Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs cfs) 11.70 0.66 12.00 6.67 12.30 7.96 12.60 3.01 12.90 1.64 13.20 1.28 •13.50 1.08 13.80 0.94 14.10 0.82 14.40 0.74 14.70 0.69 15.00 0.65 15.30 0.62 15.60 0.58 15.90 0.54 16.20 0.50 16.50 0.47 ...End 0 Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM Peak discharge = 9.40 cfs Time interval = 6 min Curve number = 69 Hydraulic length = Oft Time of conc. (Tc) = 25.9 min Distribution = Type II Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume = 40,356 butt ( Printed � - 5%d Op. Pint Interval = 3) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM • Hyd. No. 6 Table �M.d. 1..s1=5%dOP. �rort° . -" Time POND 1 ROUTED Elevation Clv A Civ B Civ C Civ D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 4.54 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 5 Reservoir name = POND 1 Max. Elevation = 903.91 ft Max. Storage = 12,281 cuft Storage Indication method used. OutFlow hydrograph volume = 40,335 tuft Hydrograph Discharge Table �M.d. 1..s1=5%dOP. �rort° . -" Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Civ B Civ C Civ D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.00 6.67 903.26 0.42 -- -- - - ----- ----- - - 0.42 12.30 7.96 903.80 3.55 - -- - ----- ----- ----- - - 3.55 12.60 3.01 903.89 4.38 - --- ----- ----- ----- - 4.38 12.90 1.64 903.76 3.24 -- - ----- ----- ----- - 3.24 13.20 1.28 903.65 2.43 -- - --- - - - - 2.43 13.50 1.08 903.57 1.91 - --- - --- - - - 1.91 13.80 0.94 903.51 1.56 - ---- - - - - - -- 1.56 14.10 0.82 903.47 1.32 -- --- - - ----- ----- ----- 1.32 14.40 0.74 903.43 1.13 -- - - - ----- ----- - 1.13 14.70 0.69 903.40 0.99 - - -- - -- 0.99 •15.00 0.65 903.38 0.90 0.90 15.30 0.62 903.37 0.82 0.82 15.60 0.58 903.35 0.76 -- --- - - - -- - -- 0.76 15.90 0.54 903.34 0.70 -- -- - -- -- 0.70 16.20 0.50 903.32 0.65 -- --- - -- - - - -- 0.65 16.50 0.47 903.31 0.60 - -- - - - 0.60 16.80 0.46 903.30 0.56 - -- -- - - - 0.56 17.10 0.44 903.29 0.54 - - - - 054 17.40 0.43 903.29 0.52 --- --- -- - - - 0.52 17.70 0.42 903.28 0.50 -- - -- - - - 0.50 18.00 0.40 903.27 0.48 -- ---- -- ----- ----- - 0.48 18.30 0.39 903.27 0.46 - - - ----- ----- - 0.46 18.60 0.37 903.26 0.44 -- -- -- - - -- 0.44 18.90 0.36 903.26 0.43 -_ ____ _- - ----- --- 0.43 19.20 0.34 903.25 0.41 -- - -- -- 0.41 19.50 0.33 903.25 0.39 - - - ----- ----- -- 0.39 19.80 0.31 903.24 0.38 -- - --- - - - -- 0.38 20.10 0.30 903.24 0.36 -- - - -- -- - - -- 0.36 20.40 0.29 903.23 0.35 - --- -- - - -- -- 0.35 20.70 0.28 903.23 0.33 - - - - - - - 0.33 21.00 0.28 903.22 0.32 - - - - - - - - 0.32 21.30 0.28 903.22 0.31 - - -- - - - - 0.31 21.60 0.27 903.22 0.30 -- - --- ----- - - 0.30 21.90 0.27 903.22 0.30 -- - - - - - - - 0.30 22.20 0.27 903.21 0.29 - --- -- - - - 0.29 22.50 0.26 903.21 0.29 - -- - - - 0.29 22.80 0.26 903.21 0.28 - -- --- - - - - - 0.28 •23.10 0.26 903.21 0.28 - - -- -- - - - - 0.28 Continues on next page POND 1ROUTED Discharge Table .Hydrograph Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Civ D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hm) cfs ft afs cis cfs cis cis efs cis cis cis cfs 23.40 0.26 903.21 0.27 — — — — — — — — 0.27 23.70 0.25 903.21 0.27 — — — — — — — — 0.27 24.00 0.25 903.21 0.26 — — — — — — — — 0.26 24.30 0.12 903.20 0.25 — — -- -- — — — — 0.25 ... End • Ll Hydrograph Report HydraHow Hydrographs by Intelisolve • Hyd. No. 7 PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #2 Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. Storm duration = SCS Runoff = 10 yrs = 13.15 ac = 0.0% = TR55 = 4.20 in = 24 hrs Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs cfs) 11.70 0.77 12.00 3.67 12.30 8.34 12.60 11.17« 12.90 9.57 13.20 7.26 •13.50 4.63 13.80 2.59 14.10 2.10 14.40 1.79 14.70 1.58 15.00 1.44 15.30 1.33 15.60 1.24 15.90 1.16 16.20 1.09 16.50 1.02 16.80 0.95 17.10 0.91 17.40 0.87 17.70 0.84 18.00 0.82 18.30 0.79 18.60 0.76 18.90 0.73 19.20 0.70 19.50 0.67 19.80 0.64 20.10 0.61 20.40 0.58 20.70 0.56 0... End Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM Peak discharge = 11.17 cfs Time interval = 6 min Curve number = 74 Hydraulic length = Oft Time of conc. (Tc) = 64.8 min Distribution = Type II Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume = 84,765 cult t Nnte va um - 5% of Op. Pont interval = 3) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM Hyd. No. 8 Outflow hydrograph volume = 84,744 tuft Hydrograph Discharge Table POND 2 ROUTED (Ponta values>=5%of Op. %nt interval -3) Time Inflow Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 8.34 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 7 Reservoir name = POND 2 Max. Elevation = 907.60 ft Max. Storage = 21,875 cuft Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume = 84,744 tuft Hydrograph Discharge Table (Ponta values>=5%of Op. %nt interval -3) Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Civ B Civ C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.30 8.34 906.68 4.28 ----- - - 1.09 -- --- - ----- 1.09 12.60 11.17 « 907.29 4.56 ---- - - - 2.85 1.62 ----- -- ----- 4.47 12.90 9.57 907.57 7.97 -- - - 3.44 4.53 --- - ----- 7.97 13.20 7.26 907.59 8.17 -- - - 3.45 4.71 --- - ----- 8.16 13.50 4.63 907.48 6.75 -- --- - 3.31 3.42 --- --- - 6.73 13.80 2.59 907.31 4.73 -- - - - 2.91 1.81 - -- - 4.72 14.10 2.10 907.19 4.28 - ---- -- 2.53 0.86 --- --- ----- 3.39 14.40 1.79 907.11 4.28 - - 2.28 0.39 -- - - 2.67 14.70 1.58 907.05 4.28 - - - 2.11 0.18 - -- ----- 2.29 15.00 1.44 907.01 4.28 - - -- 1.97 0.02 --- --- ----- 2.00 •15.30 1.33 906.96 4.28 - - 1.85 --- ----- ----- ----- 1.85 15.60 1.24 906.92 4.28 - -- -- 1.73 - ----- ----- -- 1.73 15.90 1.16 906.88 4.28 -- - - - 1.62 - --- - --- 1.62 16.20 1.09 906.85 4.28 - --- -- 1.52 - -- - - 1.52 16.50 1.02 906.81 4.28 -- - - 1.42 - - -- - 1.42 16.80 0.95 906.78 4.28 -- -- - 1.34 - - - - 1.34 17.10 0.91 906.75 4.28 -- - - 1.26 - - - - 1.26 17.40 0.87 906.72 4.28 --- - - 1.19 - - -- -- 1.19 17.70 0.84 906.69 4.28 -- - 1.13 - - - 1.13 18.00 0.82 906.67 4.28 --- ----- 1.07 - -- - -- 1.07 18.30 0.79 906.65 4.28 -- - 1.03 --- -- -- -- 1.03 18.60 0.76 906.63 4.28 -- - 0.98 -- - -- - 0.98 18.90 0.73 906.61 4.28 -- - 0.94 - - - - 0.94 19.20 0.70 906.60 4.28 -- - 0.90 --- --- - 0.90 19.50 0.67 906.58 4.28 - - 0.86 -- - - -- 0.86 19.80 0.64 906.56 4.28 -- - 0.83 --- - -- 0.83 20.10 0.61 906.55 4.28 -- - - 0.80 --- -- - - 0.80 20.40 0.58 906.53 4.28 -- --- -- 0.76 --- --- ----- - 0.76 20.70 0.56 906.52 4.28 -- - - 0.73 -- - - -- - 0.73 21.00 0.54 906.51 4.28 -- - - 0.70 --- -- - -- 0.70 21.30 0.53 906.49 4.28 -- - - 0.68 --- - - -- 0.68 21.60 0.53 906.48 4.28 -- --- - 0.65 --- -- - - - 0.65 21.90 0.52 906.47 4.28 -- - 0.63 --- - - - 0.63 22.20 0.52 906.46 4.28 -- - 0.62 -- - - 0.62 22.50 0.51 906.46 4.28 -- - - 0.60--- - - - 0.60 22.80 0.50 906.45 4.28 --- -- - 0.59 -- - ----- ----- 0.59 23.10 0.50 906.44 4.28 -- -- - 0.57 -- -- ----- ----- 0.57 •23.40 0.49 906.44 4.28 -- -- - 0.56 --- - - ----- 0.56 Continues on next page POND 2 ROUTED •Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Civ B Civ C Civ D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D ExHI Outflow (hrs) cfs ft Cfs Cfs cfs Cfs efs cfs cis cis cis Ch 23.70 0.49 906.43 4.28 --- - - 0.55 - - - - 0.55 24.00 0.48 906.42 4.28 - - - 0.54 -- -- - - 0.54 24.30 0.43 906.42 4.28 - - - 0.53 - - - - 0.53 24.60 0.32 906.41 4.28 - - - 0.51 - - - - 0.51 24.90 0.19 906.39 4.28 - - - 0.47 - - - - 0.47 25.20 0.09 906.36 4.28 - - - 0.43 - - - - 0.43 .End U Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve *Hyd. No. 9 PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #4 Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. Storm duration = SCS Runoff = 10 yrs = 3.42 ac = 0.0% = TR55 = 4.20 in = 24 hrs Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs cfs) 11.80 0.20 12.10 1.26 12.40 2.40 12.70 2.23 13.00 1.65 13.30 • 13.60 0.95 0.57 13.90 0.47 14.20 0.40 14.50 0.35 14.80 0.32 15.10 0.30 15.40 0.28 15.70 0.26 16.00 0.25 16.30 0.23 16.60 0.22 16.90 0.20 17.20 0.20 17.50 0.19 17.80 0.18 18.10 0.18 18.40 0.17 18.70 0.17 19.00 0.16 19.30 0.15 19.60 0.15 19.90 0.14 20.20 0.13 20.50 0.13 0 ...End Peak discharge Time interval Curve number Hydraulic length Time of conc. (Tc) Distribution Shape factor Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM = 2.49 cfs = 6 min = 69 = Oft = 57.8 min = Type II = 484 Hydrograph Volume = 17,361 cult (Nmve.0 = 5%pf Op. F m interval = 3) Hydrograph Report Hydralow Hydrographs by In1eli5olve Hyd. No. 10 PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #3 Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. Storm duration = SCS Runoff = 10 yrs = 27.05 ac = 0.0% = TR55 = 4.20 in = 24 hrs Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs cfs) 11.80 1.62 12.10 9.94 12.40 18.98 12.70 17.68 13.00 13.05 0 ...End Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM Peak discharge 7.55 •13.30 13.60 4.55 - 13.90 3.71 14.20 3.19 14.50 2.81 14.80 2.54 15.10 2.36 15.40 2.21 15.70 2.08 16.00 1.95 16.30 1.82 16.60 1.70 16.90 1.62 17.20 1.56 17.50 1.51 17.80 1.46 18.10 1.41 18.40 1.36 18.70 1.31 19.00 1.26 19.30 1.21 19.60 1.16 19.90 1.11 20.20 1.05 20.50 1.01 0 ...End Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM Peak discharge = 19.69 cfs Time interval = 6 min Curve number = 69 Hydraulic length = Oft Time of conc. (Tc) = 50.7 min Distribution = Type II Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume = 137,312 cult (Pnntmva1uw>•5%0(QP. P nonterval=3) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve • Hyd. No. 11 DRAINAGE AREA #5 Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. Storm duration = SCS Runoff = 10 yrs = 2.37 ac = 0.0% = TR55 = 4.20 in = 24 hrs Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs cfs) 11.70 0.18 12.00 1.11 12.30 2.37 12.60 2.02 12.90 1.21 ..End U Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM Peak discharge = 2.42 cfs Time interval 0.54 •13.20 13.50 0.42 13.80 0.35 14.10 0.30 14.40 0.26 14.70 0.24 15.00 0.22 15.30 0.21 15.60 0.20 15.90 0.18 16.20 0.17 16.50 0.16 16.80 0.15 17.10 0.15 17.40 0.14 17.70 0.14 18.00 0.13 18.30 0.13 18.60 0.12 ..End U Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM Peak discharge = 2.42 cfs Time interval = 6 min Curve number = 73 Hydraulic length = Oft Time of conc. (Tc) = 40.3 min Distribution = Type II Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume = 14,029 cult (P ntw"Iun>,5%coop . RMlmene1=3) Hydrograph Report Hydrafiow Hydrographs by IntelisoNe • Hyd. No. 12 Discharge to RCP at NW Corner Hydrograph type = Combine Storm frequency = 10 yrs Inflow hyds. = 8, 11 Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM Peak discharge = 5.79 cfs Time interval = 6 min Hydrograph Volume = 72,989 cult Hydrograph Discharge Table (Pnn1adva1v"-5%of Qp Nnlinle sl=3) Time Hyd. 8 + Hyd. 11 = Outflow (hrs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 12.00 0.22 1.11 1.24 12.30 1.09 2.37 3.02 12.60 4.47 2.02 3.88 12.90 7.97 1.21 5.54 13.20 8.16 0.54 5.71 13.50 6.73 0.42 4.92 13.80 4.72 0.35 3.68 14.10 3.39 0.30 2.81 14.40 2.67 0.26 2.34 14.70 2.29 0.24 2.07 15.00 2.00 0.22 1.89 15.30 1.85 0.21 1.74 15.60 1.73 0.20 1.60 15.90 1.62 0.18 1.48 16.20 1.52 0.17 1.37 16.50 1.42 0.16 1.27 16.80 1.34 0.15 1.18 17.10 1.26 0.15 1.11 17.40 1.19 0.14 1.04 17.70 1.13 0.14 0.99 18.00 1.07 0.13 0.94 18.30 1.03 0.13 0.89 18.60 0.98 0.12 0.85 18.90 0.94 0.12 0.81 19.20 0.90 0.11 0.78 19.50 0.86 0.11 0.74 19.80 0.83 0.10 0.71 20.10 0.80 0.10 0.68 20.40 0.76 0.09 0.65 20.70 0.73 0.09 0.62 21.00 0.70 0.09 0.60 21.30 0.68 0.09 0.58 21.60 0.65 0.09 0.56 21.90 0.63 0.09 0.55 22.20 0.62 0.09 0.53 22.50 0.60 0.09 0.52 22.80 0.59 0.08 0.51 23.10 0.57 0.08 0.50 0 Continues on next page... Discharge to RCP at NW Corner �Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Hyd. 8 + Hyd. 11 = Outflow (hrs) (cam) (S) WS) 23.40 0.56 0.08 0.49 23.70 0.55 0.08 0.48 24.00 0.54 0.08 0.47 24.30 0.53 0.07 0.44 24.60 0.51 0.03 0.40 24.90 0.47 0.01 0.35 25.20 0.43 0.00 0.31 ...End • 0 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Inflow Wednesday, Oct 12 2005. 6:55 PM Hyd. No. 13 (hrs) cfs ft <no description> 12.30 3.02 903.22 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 4.74 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 12 Reservoir name = POND 1 Max. Elevation = 903.93 ft Max. Storage = 12,573 cuft Storage Indication method used. Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Civ A Civ B Clv C Civ D Wr A (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.30 3.02 903.22 0.32 ---- ----- --- ----- 12.60 3.88 903.45 1.21 -- ----- -- - 12.90 5.54 903.67 2.62 - --- -- - 13.20 5.71 903.86 4.10 - -- -- -- 13.50 4.92 903.93 << 4.74 -- --- -- --- 13.80 3.68 903.90 4.47 - -- -- - 14.10 2.81 903.83 3.82 --- - - - 14.40 2.34 903.75 3.21 --- ---- -- - 14.70 2.07 903.69 2.73 --- --•- - -- 15.00 1.89 903.65 2.41 ----- ---- - - 15.30 . 1.74 903.61 2.15 --- ----- -- - 15.60 1.60 903.58 1.95 --- - - - 15.90 1.48 903.55 1.79 -- --- -- -- 16.20 1.37 903.53 1.64 - -- --- 16.50 1.27 903.51 1.52 -- - -- ---- 16.80 1.18 903.49 1.41 -- --- - -- 17.10 1.11 903.47 1.32 -- --- - - 17.40 1.04 903.45 1.24 - --- - -- 17.70 0.99 903.44 1.16 --- --- - 18.00 0.94 903.43 1.10 -- - - - - 18.30 0.89 903.41 1.03 - - ---- 18.60 0.85 903.40 0.98 - - 18.90 0.81 903.39 0.93 - -- --- 19.20 0.78 903.38 0.90 - - - -- 19.50 0.74 903.37 0.86 - - --- 19.80 0.71 903.36 0.82 -- --- - -- 20.10 0.68 903.36 0.79 - -- - - 20.40 0.65 903.35 0.75 ---- - - 20.70 0.62 903.34 0.72 -- - - - 21.00 0.60 903.33 0.69 - -- - - 21.30 0.58 903.33 0.66 - --- - -- 21.60 0.56 903.32 0.64 - - 21.90 0.55 903.31 0.61 - -- --- 22.20 0.53 903.31 0.59 -- - - 22.50 0.52 903.30 0.57 - - ---- --- 22.80 0.51 903.30 0.56 -- -- - 23.10 0.50 903.30 0.54 - - -- - 23.40 0 0.49 903.29 0.53 --- ---- - - Outflow hydrograph volume = 72,968 cuft (f ntm values - 5% of or. Pont irne al = 3) Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs - ----- ----- ----- 0.32 - - ----- ----- - 1.21 -- - - - 2.62 -- - -- 4.10 - ----- ----- - 4.74 « 4.47 - - - -- 3.82 - ----- ----- - 3.21 -- - - - 2.73 -- ----- ----- -- 2.41 - -- -- 2.15 - - - 1.95 -- - - - 1.79 -- -- - 1.64 -- - -- 1.52 - - - -- 1.41 -- -- 1.32 -- - - 1.24 - - -- 1.16 -- -- - -- 1.10 - - - - 1.03 - - -- - 0.98 - - - 0.94 -- --- - 0.89 - -- 0.86 - 0.82 - - -- -- 0.79 - - -- 0.75 _ __-- -- --- 0.72 -- -- - ----- 0.69 -- -- -- - 0.66 - -- -- 0.64 - - -- ----- 0.61 - - - - 0.59 _- - - - 0.57 - -- -- 0.56 - - - -- 0.54 -- - - - 0.53 Continues on next page... <no description> Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation C (hrs) cfs ft Cf 23.70 0.48 903.29 0. 24.00 0.47 903.29 0. 24.30 0.44 903.28 0. ... End L, L iv A Clv B Civ C Civ D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow S cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 52 ---- - - - - - 0.52 51 ---- -- -- - ----- ----- - 0.51 50 --- -- - - - - 0.50 24.60 0.40 903.28 ----- ----- 0. 48 ----- ----- -- - - -- 0.48 24.90 0.35 903.27 0. 46 --- - - - - - - - 0.46 25.20 0.31 903.26 0. 43 - -- - - - ----- ----- - 0.43 25.50 0.28 903.25 0. 40 ---- - _ -_ -_ - ---- __- 0.40 25.80 0.25 903.24 0. 37 --- -- - - - -- - 0.37 26.10 0.22 903.23 0. 34 ----- ----- ---- -- - - -- - 0.34 26.40 0.19 903.22 0. 31 ----- ---- - - - -- -- 0.31 26.70 0.17 903.21 0. 28 --- - - -- - - - 0.28 27.00 0.16 903.20 0 .26 ---- - - - - - - - 0.26 27.30 0.14 903.19 0 .24 ----- -- - - - - - 0.24 L, L Stormwater Quality and Quantity Management Plan • Chanhassen Short Course — Proposed Golf Course Chanhassen, Minnesota 100 YEAR HYDROGRAPHS 0 11 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 1 EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #1 Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. Storm duration = SCS Runoff = 100 yrs = 11.41 ac = 0.0% = TR55 = 6.00 in = 24 hrs Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs cfs) 11.60 1.40 11.90 10.56 12.20 24.19 << 12.50 11.32 12.80 4.40 13.10 13.40 3.24 2.69 13.70 2.31 14.00 2.01 14.30 1.77 14.60 1.64 14.90 1.55 15.20 1.46 15.50 1.37 15.80 1.28 ...End 0 Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM Peak discharge = 24.19 cfs Time interval = 6 min Curve number = 66 Hydraulic length = Oft Time of conc. (Tc) = 29.3 min Distribution = Type II Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume = 101,069 CA (Nn 1vales-5%d Oy. P MiMa l-3) • 0 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 3 EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #3 Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. Storm duration = SCS Runoff = 100 yrs = 30.71 ac = 5.0% = TR55 = 6.00 in = 24 hrs Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs cfs) 11.60 3.77 11.90 28.42 12.20 65.12 << 12.50 30.46 12.80 11.85 13.10 8.73 13.40 7.24 13.70 6.21 14.00 5.40 14.30 4.78 14.60 4.43 14.90 4.18 15.20 3.94 15.50 3.69 15.80 3.44 ...End Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM Peak discharge = 65.12 cfs Time interval = 6 min Curve number = 66 Hydraulic length = Oft Time of conc. (Tc) = 25.4 min Distribution = Type II Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume = 272,028 cuff I PoNed vtlu - 5% of Op. Pant role l = 3) Hydrograph Report Hydratlow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 4 EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #4 Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. Storm duration = SCS Runoff = 100 yrs = 2.49 ac = 0.0% = TR55 = 6.00 in = 24 hrs Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs cfs) 11.60 0.31 11.90 2.30 12.20 5.28 << 12.50 2.47 12.80 0.96 13.10 • 13.40 0.71 0.59 13.70 0.50 14.00 0.44 14.30 0.39 14.60 0.36 14.90 0.34 15.20 0.32 15.50 0.30 15.80 0.28 ...End • Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM Peak discharge = 5.28 cfs Time interval = 6 min Curve number = 66 Hydraulic length = Oft Time of conc. (Tc) = 26.1 min Distribution = Type II Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume = 22,056 cult ( Ponted vabes - 5%d pp. Pont interval . 3) Hydrograph Report Hydrallow Hydrographs by Intelisolve • Hyd. No. 5 PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #1 0 0 Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. Storm duration = SCS Runoff = 100 yrs = 7.95 ac = 0.0% = TR55 = 6.00 in = 24 hrs Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs cfs) 11.50 0.97 11.80 4.18 12.10 18.80 12.40 12.18 12.70 3.81 13.00 2.65 13.30 2.13 13.60 1.81 13.90 1.57 14.20 1.37 14.50 1.25 14.80 1.18 15.10 1.11 15.40 1.04 15.70 0.97 ... End Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM Peak discharge = 18.90 cfs Time interval = 6 min Curve number = 69 Hydraulic length = Oft Time of conc. (Tc) = 25.9 min Distribution = Type II Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume = 76,280 tuft FnNeC va1�05 >= 5%d Op. Pool interval = 3) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM Hyd. No. 6 Table (Pnnte vai es>-5%vfop. Printinte 1-3) Time POND 1ROUTED Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 10.81 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 5 Reservoir name = POND 1 Max. Elevation = 904.52 ft Max. Storage = 22,361 cuft Storage Indication method used. Outflow hydrograph volume = 78,259 cuft Hydrograph Discharge Table (Pnnte vai es>-5%vfop. Printinte 1-3) Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.00 14.51 903.69 2.72 ----- --- ---- ---- ----- --- ----- ----- 2.72 12.30 15.68 904.45 10.00 ---- --- ----- - - - --- ----- 10.00 12.60 5.50 904.45 9.97 ----- -- ---- --- - - - 9.97 12.90 2.93 904.15 6.88 ----- ----- ---- --- - -- - - 6.88 13.20 2.27 903.94 4.76 ----- --- --- -- - - - 4.76 13.50 1.91 903.78 3.41 ----- -- - -- - - - 3.41 13.80 1.64 903.68 2.65 ----- -- --- -- - - - - 2.65 14.10 1.43 903.61 2.17 - - -- - --- -- - - 2.17 14.40 1.28 903.56 1.84 -- -- -- -- --- -- - - 1.84 14.70 1.20 903.52 1.61 -- -- -- --- - - - - 1.61 • 15.00 1.13 903.49 1.44 - - -- --- - - 1.44 15.30 1.06 903.47 1.32 --- -- -- --- _ --- - - 1.32 15.60 0.99 903.45 1.22 -- --- -- -- - -- - - 1.22 15.90 0.92 903.43 1.13 -- - --- - --- - - 1.13 16.20 0.85 903.42 1.05 --- -- -- - - - - - 1.05 16.50 0.81 903.40 0.97 - - - --- -- - -- -- 0.97 16.80 0.78 903.39 0.92 - -- - -- - - - -- 0.92 17.10 0.76 903.38 0.88 - - -- --- - - - - - 0.88 17.40 0.73 903.37 0.84 -- - - --- ---- - - 0.84 17.70 0.71 903.36 0.81 - -- ---- -- - - 0.81 18.00 0.68 903.35 0.78 - - - --- - - - 0.78 18.30 0.66 903.35 0.75 - -- -- - -- - 0.75 18.60 0.63 903.34 0.72 - - - - - - -- - 0.72 18.90 0.61 903.33 0.69 - - - -- - - -- -- 0.69 19.20 0.58 903.33 0.66 - - -- - -- - -- 0.66 19.50 0.55 903.32 0.63 - ---- - - - -- 0.63 19.80 0.53 903.31 0.61 -- - --- - - - - -- 0.61 20.10 0.50 903.31 0.58 - - --- -- - - - - 0.58 20.40 0.48 903.30 0.55 - - - -- --- - - 0.55 End 0 Hydrograph Report Hydrafiow Hydrographs by Intelisolve •Hyd. No. 7 0 PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #2 Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. Storm duration = SCS Runoff = 100 yrs = 13.15 ac = 0.0% = TR55 = 6.00 in = 24 hrs Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs cfs) 11.30 1.13 11.60 1.70 11.90 5.08 12.20 13.49 12.50 20.70 12.80 18.87 13.10 14.62 13.40 9.71 13.70 5.13 14.00 3.74 14.30 3.14 14.60 2.73 14.90 2.45 15.20 2.25 15.50 2.09 15.80 1.96 16.10 1.83 16.40 1.70 16.70 1.59 17.00 1.51 17.30 1.44 17.60 1.39 17.90 1.34 18,20 1.30 18.50 1.25 18.80 1.20 19.10 1.15 19.40 1.10 19.70 1.06 won Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM Peak discharge = 20.96 cfs Time interval = 6 min Curve number = 74 Hydraulic length = Oft Time of conc. (Tc) = 64.8 min Distribution = Type II Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume = 154,743 cuR (Printed values - 5%M dp. PnM interval = 3) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve - 1.09 Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:56 PM . Hyd. No. 8 8.63 -- - Time Inflow POND 2 ROUTED Civ A Civ B Civ C Clv D Wr A (hrs) Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 13.94 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 7 Reservoir name = POND 2 Max. Elevation = 908.62 ft Max. Storage = 38,082 cuft Storage Indication method used. - 1.09 2.64 - Hydrograph Discharge Table 8.63 -- - Time Inflow Elevation Civ A Civ B Civ C Clv D Wr A (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.00 7.79 906.68 4.28 - -- 1.09 12.30 16.32 907.40 5.83 - - 3.15 12.60 20.96 << 908.10 12.02 -- -- 3.40 12.90 17.58 908.52 13.61 - - 3.40 13.20 13.03 908.61 13.94 -- -- 3.40 13.50 8.04 908.41 13.26 -- - -- 3.39 13.80 4.36 907.99 11.53 -- - - 3.40 14.10 3.50 907.56 7.79 -- -- -- 3.42 14.40 2.99 907.34 5.06 - - - 2.99 14.70 2.63 907.23 4.36 - -- -- 2.64 .15.00 2.38 907.16 4.28-- 2.43 15.30 2.19 907.11 - 4.28 2.29 15.60 2.05 907.08 4.28 - - - 2.19 15.90 1.92 907.05 4.28 - - - 2.11 16.20 1.79 907.03 4.28 - - - 2.03 16.50 1.66 907.00 4.28 - - - 1.96 16.80 1.56 906.98 4.28 -- - ----- 1.89 17.10 1.49 906.95 4.28 ----- -- ---- 1.81 17.40 1.43 906.92 4.28 ----- ---- ----- 1.73 17.70 1.37 906.90 4.28 ----- ----- - 1.66 18.00 1.33 906.88 4.28 -- --- 1.60 18.30 1.28 906.85 4.28 -- - --- 1.54 18.60 1.23 906.83 4.28 - - --- 1.48 18.90 1.19 906.81 4.28 - - --- 1.43 19.20 1.14 906.79 4.28 - - ----- 1.38 19.50 1.09 906.77 4.28 - -- - 1.32 19.80 1.04 906.75 4.28 - - --- 1.28 20.10 0.99 906.73 4.28 - - -- 1.23 20.40 0.95 906.71 4.28 - - - 1.18 20.70 0.91 906.69 4.28 -- - -- 1.13 21.00 0.88 906.68 4.28 - - -- 1.09 21.30 0.86 906.66 4.28 --- - -- 1.05 21.60 0.85 906.65 4.28 -- - --- 1.01 21.90 0.84 906.63 4.28 -- -- - 0.98 22.20 0.83 906.62 4.28 - - 0.96 22.50 0.82 906.61 4.28 - - - - 0.93 22.80 0.81 906.60 4.28 ---- - - 0.91 •23.10 0.80 906.60 4.28 ---- ---- --- 0.90 Outflow hydrograph volume = 154,722 cuft ( PonteC valves �= 5%or Op. Rim Intmal = 3) Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfl Outflow cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs ---- - - 1.09 2.64 - - 5.79 8.63 -- - -- 12.02 10.22 -- - - 13.61 10.54 --- - - 13.93 9.87 - - - 13.26 8.13 - - - 11.53 4.36 - --- - 7.78 2.06 -- --- - 5.05 1.13 - - -- 3.77 0.68 --- -- - 3.11 0.41 --- ---- - 2.70 0.27 -- -- - 2.46 0.17 - - 2.28 0.09 -- -- - 2.12 0.01 -- -- - 1.97 -- - - 1.89 - -- - - 1.81 - - -- --- 1.73 - - - - 1.66 - - - - 1.60 - - --- - 1.54 -- - - - 1.48 - - - - 1.43 - -- - - 1.37 - - - - 1.32 - - - - 1.28 - - 1.23 - - ----- ----- 1.18 - - - 1.13 - - - 1.09 - - 1.05 - ----- ----- 1.01 - - - 0.98 - 0.96 -- - 0.93 - - - 0.91 - - - - 0.90 Continues on next page... POND 2 ROUTED • Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Civ A Clv B Civ C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exf-1 Outflow (hrs) cfs ft cfs Cfs Cfs Cfs cfs Cfs cfs Cfs Cfs cfs 23.40 0.79 906.59 4.28 ----- -- 0.88 ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.88 23.70 0.78 906.58 4.28 --- 0.86 -- ---- -- - 0.86 24.00 0.78 906.57 4.28 --- - 0.85 -- - - 0.85 24.30 0.70 906.57 4.28 --- 0.83 -- -- - - 0.83 24.60 0.52 906.55 4.28 --- 0.80 - - -- 0.80 24.90 0.30 906.52 4.28 --- -- -- 0.73 - - - - 0.73 ... End 0 0 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve . Hyd. No. 9 PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #4 Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. Storm duration = SCS Runoff = 100 yrs = 3.42 ac = 0.0% = TR55 = 6.00 in = 24 hrs Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs cfs) 11.50 0.26 11.80 0.69 12.10 2.86 12.40 5.00 12.70 4.47 13.00 3.18 13.30 1.74 13.60 1.02 13.90 0.83 14.20 0.71 14.50 0.62 14.80 0.56 15.10 0.52 15.40 0.48 15.70 0.45 16.00 0.42 16.30 0.39 16.60 0.37 16.90 0.35 17.20 0.34 17.50 0.33 17.80 0.31 18.10 0.30 18.40 0.29 18.70 0.28 19.00 0.27 19.30 0.26 MAMA • Peak discharge Time interval Curve number Hydraulic length Time of conc. (Tc) Distribution Shape factor Wednesday, Oct 12 2005,6:56 PM = 5.10 cfs = 6 min = 69 = Oft = 57.8 min = Type II = 484 Hydrograph Volume = 33,675 tuft (Pnned values >= 5%d QPPnnt in)erva, = 3) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve 0 Hyd. No. 10 PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #3 Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. Storm duration = SCS Runoff = 100 yrs = 27.05 ac = 0.0% = TR55 = 6.00 in = 24 hrs Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs cfs) 11.50 2.05 11.80 5.50 12.10 22.63 12.40 39.58 12.70 35.35 13.00 • 13.30 25.16 13.79 13.60 8.06 13.90 6.53 14.20 5.59 14.50 4.89 14.80 4.42 15.10 4.08 15.40 3.82 15.70 3.59 16.00 3.35 16.30 3.12 16.60 2.92 16.90 2.77 17.20 2.66 17.50 2.57 17.80 2.49 18.10 2.40 18.40 2.31 18.70 2.23 19.00 2.14 19.30 2.05 ...End • Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:56 PM Peak discharge = 40.31 cfs Time interval = 6 min Curve number = 69 Hydraulic length = Oft Time of conc. (Tc) = 50.7 min Distribution = Type II Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume = 266,349 cult (Pnntw values>=5%d op. Pant in al -3) Hydrograph Report Hydranow Hydrographs by Intelisolve 0 Hyd. No. 11 DRAINAGE AREA #5 Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. Storm duration = SCS Runoff = 100 yrs = 2.37 ac = 0.0% = TR55 = 6.00 in = 24 hrs Hydrograph Discharge Table Time - Outflow (hrs cfs) 11.40 0.26 11.70 0.51 12.00 2.31 12.30 4.56 12.60 3.75 •12.90 13.20 2.15 0.93 13.50 0.71 13.80 0.59 14.10 0.50 14.40 0.44 14.70 0.40 15.00 0.37 15.30 0.35 15.60 0.33 15.90 0.31 16.20 0.28 16.50 0.26 16.80 0.25 17.10 0.24 17.40 0.23 ...End • Wednesday, Oct 12 2005. 6:56 PM Peak discharge = 4.59 cfs Time interval = 6 min Curve number = 73 Hydraulic length = Oft Time of conc. (Tc) = 40.3 min Distribution = Type II Shape factor = 484 Hydrogmph Volume = 25,907 tuft I Pnmw values - 5% of op. pont interval = 3) Hydrograph Report Hydrallow Hydrographs by Inlelisolve • Hyd. No. 12 Discharge to RCP at NW Corner Hydrograph type = Combine Storm frequency = 100 yrs Inflow hyds. = 8, 11 Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:56 PM Peak discharge = 13.32 cfs Time interval = 6 min Hydrograph Volume = 133,559 cuff Hydrograph Discharge Table �n"avelu� >=5%of Op. �ntnte"I 3) Time Hyd. 8 + Hyd. 11 = Outflow (hrs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 11.70 0.44 0.51 0.77 12.00 1.09 2.31 2.96 12.30 5.79 4.56 6.90 12.60 12.02 3.75 12.55 12.90 13.61 2.15 13.07 13.20 13.93 0.93 11.72 13.50 13.26 0.71 9.77 13.80 11.53 0.59 6.58 14.10 7.78 0.50 4.59 14.40 5.05 0.44 3.56 14.70 3.77 0.40 2.95 15.00 3.11 0.37 2.62 15.30 2.70 0.35 2.35 15.60 2.46 0.33 2.20 15.90 2.28 0.31 2.07 16.20 2.12 0.28 1.95 16.50 1.97 0.26 1.83 16.80 1.89 0.25 1.73 17.10 1.81 024 1.64 17.40 1.73 0.23 1.56 17.70 1.66 0.23 1.48 18.00 1.60 0.22 1.41 18.30 1.54 0.21 1.35 18.60 1.48 0.20 1.30 18.90 1.43 0.19 1.24 19.20 1.37 0.19 1.19 19.50 1.32 0.18 1.14 19.80 1.28 0.17 1.09 20.10 1.23 0.16 1.05 20.40 1.18 0.15 1.01 20.70 1.13 0.15 0.97 21.00 1.09 0.15 0.93 21.30 1.05 0.14 0.90 21.60 1.01 0.14 0-87 21.90 0.98 0.14 0.85 22.20 0.96 0.14 0.83 22.50 0.93 0.14 0.81 22.80 0.91 0.14 0.79 Continues on next page... Discharge to RCP at NW Corner • Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Hyd.8+ Hyd. 11 = (hrs) (cfs) (cfs) Outflow (cfs) 23.10 0.90 0.14 0.78 23.40 0.88 0.13 0.76 23.70 0.86 0.13 0.75 24.00 0.85 0.13 0.73 24.30 0.83 0.11 0.70 End • • Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:56 PM • Hyd. Time Inflow Elevation No. 13 (hrs) cfs ft <no description> 12.30 6.90 903.55 Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 10.97 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 6 min Inflow hyd. No. = 12 Reservoir name = POND 1 Max. Elevation = 904.54 ft Max. Storage = 22,622 cuft Storage Indication method used. Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Civ B Clv C Clv D Wr A (hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 12.30 6.90 903.55 1.76 ----- --- - - 12.60 12.55 904.04 5.76 ----- -- - -- 12.90 13.07 904.39 9.35 ----- ---- --- 13.20 11.72 904.53 10.84 ---- ---- - - 13.50 9.77 904.53 10.82 --- - - -- 13.80 6.58 904.39 9.40 ----- --- - - 14.10 4.59 904.21 7.43 ----- --- - - 14.40 3.56 904.04 5.79 -- - - 14.70 2.95 903.90 4.48 - -- - - 15.00 2.62 903.81 3.62 - --- - - •15.30 2.35 903.74 3.08 --- 15.60 2.20 903.69 _ T 2.70 -- 15.90 2.07 903.65 2.46 --- -- -- - 16.20 1.95 903.62 2.26 --- -- - -- 16.50 1.83 903.60 2.10 -- -- - - 16.80 1.73 903.58 1.97 -- - - - -- 17.10 1.64 903.56 1.86 --- - -- -- 17.40 1.56 903.55 1.76 --- -- - - - 17.70 1.48 903.53 1.66 --- - - - 18.00 1.41 903.52 1.58 --- ----- - - 18.30 1.35 903.50 1.50 - -- -- 18.60 1.30 903.49 1.44 - -- -- -- 18.90 1.24 903.48 1.38 --- - -- - 19.20 1.19 903.47 1.32 -- -- - - 19.50 1.14 903.46 1.27 - --- - -- 19.80 1.09 903.45 1.22 - - - 20.10 1.05 903.44 1.17 - --- - - 20.40 1.01 903.43 1.12 -- --- -- - 20.70 0.97 903.42 1.07 - --- -- -- 21.00 0.93 903.41 1.03 ---- - -- - 21.30 0.90 903.40 0.99 --- - -- - 21.60 0.87 903.40 0.96 --- - - -- 21.90 0.85 903.39 0.93 --- - - - 22.20 0.83 903.38 0.90 --- - - 22.50 0.81 903.38 0.88 --- ----- ----- 22.80 0.79 903.37 0.86 - ----- ----- ----- 23.10 0.78 903.37 0.84 - --- - �23.40 0.76 903.36 0.82 - -- - Outflow hydrograph volume = 133,538 wft (P,n values -5%d 0, NN interval -3) Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs -- ----- ----- --- 5.76 - - - ----- 9.35 - - ----- ----- - 10.84 - ----- ----- ----- 10.82 - - ----- 9.40 ----- ---- -- --- 7.43 - - - ----- 5.79 - - - 4.48 __- - -- -- 3.62 -- -- - -- 3.08 -- -- - --- 2.70 - - 2.46 - - _-- -- 2.26 - - -- -- 2.10 - - -- - 1.97 ----- ----- - - 1.86 -- - -- - 1.76 -- - - -- 1.66 - --- ----- -- 1.58 - - -- -- 1.50 - - 1.44 - - - 1.38 -- -- - -- 1.32 - -- - - 1.27 - - 1.22 - 1.17 1.12 -- - - ---- 1.07 ---- 1.03 -- -- - -- 0.99 0.96 -- - - - 0.93 -- - - --- 0.90 ----- ----- - - 0.88 - -- _- 0.86 - - - - - 0.84 - - -- 0.82 Continues on next page... mo description> • Hydrograph Discharge Table Time Inflow Elevation CI (hrs) cfs ft Cf 23.70 0.75 903.36 0. 24.00 0.73 903.36 0. 24.30 0.70 903.35 0. 24.60 0.62 903.34 0. 24.90 0.54 903.33 0. 25.20 0.47 903.32 0. 25.50 0.41 903.31 0. ...End • C� Iv A Civ B Civ C Civ D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Outflow S cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs - - ----- 0.80 -- -- - - 0.78 -- -- - - - 0.76 73 ----- ---- - - -- - - - 0.73 64 -- - -- - - - - - 0.69 ----- -- ---- --- ----- ---- ____ 0.64 58 ---- - -- - - -- - 0.58 • C� Stormwater Quality and Quantity Management Plan Chanhassen Short Course — Proposed Golf Course • Chanhassen, Minnesota NURP Data 0 0 Short Course •Chanhassen Location: Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared for SMG INC. Prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. Date: July 18, 2003 Revised: October 5, 2005 Nurp Design Pond 2 P = 2.5 "Storm Aw = 9.15 Acres No. of Houses = 1 Each Ave. House Roof Area = 2400 SF No. of Driveways 1 Each Ave. Driveway Area = 900 SF Length of Street = 62000 LF Width of Street = 1 FT T000logv Area CN Total Hardcover Area = 1.50 Acres 98 Grasscover= 7.65 Acres 69 Hardcover For Fi = 144 Acres (Streets & Drives) CN 74 Fi = 0.16 Impervious Fraction • PerviousCN = 69.21 S = 1000/CN - 10 = 4.45 Maximum Soil Retention (inches) R= PFi+(P-.2S)(P-.2Sx1-Fiy(P+.8S) R = 0.75 Design Storm Runoff(inches) V = RAw/12 = 0.58 Permanent Pool Volume Required (Ac -Ft) Ponding Dead Storage Volume Based on Plan Contours - 10:1 Bench Then 3:1 Slopes Contour Area (sf) Cummulative Storage(cf) (Acre -Feet) 896 Bottom 0 0 Bottom 0.00 898 874 874 0.02 900 2977 2977 0.07 902 5640 11594 0.27 904 8662 25696 0.59 906 NWL 12047 46605 NWL 1.07 (Provided) j Dead Storage/Pond Surface Area = 3.87 0 Stormwater Quality and Quantity Management Plan Chanhassen Short Course — Proposed Golf Course Chanhassen, Minnesota TR55 Worksheets 0 0 TR55 Tc Worksheet Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 1 EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #1 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n -value = 0.150 0.000 0.000 Flow length (ft) = 300.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24 -hr precip. (in) = 2.50 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 2.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 26.70 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 26.70 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 360.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 2.00 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Average velocity (ft/s) = 2.28 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 2.63 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 2.63 Flow •Channel X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n -value = 0.015 0.000 0.000 Velocity (ft/s) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc.............................................................................. 29.30 min • TR55 Tc Worksheet Hydmflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 2 EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #2 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n -value = 0.150 0.000 0.000 Flow length (ft) = 300.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24 -hr precip. (in) = 2.50 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 2.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 26.70 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 26.70 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 1240.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 2.00 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Average velocity (fUs) = 2.28 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 9.06 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 9.06 •Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n -value = 0.015 0.000 0.000 Velocity (ft/s) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc.............................................................................. 35.80 min 0 TR55 Tc Worksheet Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve 10 Hyd. No. 3 EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #3 Description A B C Sheet Flow Manning's n -value = 0.150 0.000 0.000 Flow length (ft) = 300.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24 -hr precip. (in) = 2.50 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 5.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 18.50 + 0.00 + 0.00 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 1490.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 5.00 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Average velocity (ft/s) = 3.61 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 6.88 + 0.00 + 0.00 Flow •Channel X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n -value = 0.015 0.000 0.000 Velocity (ft/s) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 TotalTravel Time, Tc............................................................................ 0 Totals 18.50 0.00 25.40 min TR55 Tc Worksheet Hydraflow Hydrographs by Inteltsolve Hyd. No. 4 EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA #4 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n -value = 0.150 0.000 0.000 Flow length (ft) = 300.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24 -hr precip. (in) = 2.90 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 2.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 24.79 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 24.79 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 212.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 2.60 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Average velocity fts) = 2.60 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 1.36 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 1.36 Flow •Channel X sectional flow area (scift) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n -value = 0.015 0.000 0.000 Velocity (ft/s) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc.............................................................................. 26.10 min 0 TR55 Tc Worksheet HydraFlow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 5 PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #1 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n -value = 0.150 0.000 0.000 Flow length (ft) = 300.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24 -hr precip. (in) = 2.50 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 2.70 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 23.68 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 23.68 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 360.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 2.70 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Average velocity (fUs) = 2.65 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 2.26 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 2.26 Flow •Channel X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n -value = 0.015 0.000 0.000 Velocity (ft/s) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc.............................................................................. 25.90 min 0 TR55 Tc Worksheet HydraFlow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 7 PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #2 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n -value = 0.410 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 300.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24 -hr precip. (in) = 2.50 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 2.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 59.67 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 59.67 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 700.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 2.00 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Paved Paved Average velocity (ft/s) = 2.28 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 5.11 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 5.11 •Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n -value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity (ft/s) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc.............................................................................. 64.80 min 0 TR55 Tc Worksheet Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 9 PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #4 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow = 2.40 0.00 0.00 Manning's n -value = 0.410 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 300.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24 -hr precip. (in) = 2.40 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 2.90 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 52.49 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 52.49 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 800.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 2.40 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Paved Paved Average velocity (ft/s) = 2.50 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 5.33 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 5.33 •Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n -value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity (ft/s) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc.............................................................................. 57.80 min is TR55 Tc Worksheet • Hyd. No. 10 PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA #3 Description Sheet Flow Manning's n -value Flow length (ft) Two-year 24 -hr precip. (in) Land slope (%) Travel Time (min) Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) Watercourse slope (%) Surface description Average velocity (ft/s) Travel Time (min) •Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) Wetted perimeter (ft) Channel slope (%) Manning's n -value Velocity (ft/s) Flow length (ft) • A B C = 0.410 0.011 0.011 = 300.0 0.0 0.0 = 2.50 0.00 0.00 = 4.50 0.00 0.00 = 43.14 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 1630.00 0.00 0.00 = 5.00 0.00 0.00 = Unpaved Paved Paved = 3.61 0.00 0.00 Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Totals = 43.14 = 7.53 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 7.53 = 0.00 0.00 0.00 = 0.00 0.00 0.00 = 0.00 0.00 0.00 = 0.015 0.015 0.015 = 0.00 0.00 0.00 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = TotalTravel Time, Tc.............................................................................. D Ii 50.70 min TR55 Tc Worksheet Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve • Hyd. No. 11 DRAINAGE AREA #5 Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n -value = 0.240 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 300.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24 -hr precip. (in) = 2.50 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 2.67 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 34.65 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 34.65 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 900.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 2.67 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Paved Paved Average velocity (ft/s) = 2.64 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 5.69 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 5.69 Flow •Channel X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n -value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity (ft/s) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Total Travel Time, Tc.............................................................................. 40.30 min 0 Stormwater Quality and Quantity Management Plan Chanhassen Short Course — Proposed Golf Course Chanhassen, Minnesota Outlet Structure Data and Ponding Information 0 0 Pond Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Pond No. 1 - POND 1 • Pond Data Pond storage Is based on known contour areas. Conic method used. Stage / Storage Table Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sgtt) Iner. Storage (tuft) 0.00 903.00 12,935 0 1.00 904.00 14,033 13,479 2.00 905.00 20,000 16,927 Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM Total storage (tuft) 0 13,479 30,406 Culvert I Orifice Structures Storage Elevation Weir Structures tuft ft cis (A] [B] [C] [D] [A] [B] [C] [D] Rise (in) = 24.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Lan (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Span (in) = 24.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest EI. (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. Barrels = 1 0 0 0 Weir CoeH. = 3.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 Invert EI. (ft) = 903.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = - - - -- Length (ft) = 80.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Muhl -Stage = No No No No Slope (%) = 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 904.40 9.46 1.50 21,942 N -Value = .013 .000 .000 .000 11.61 1.70 25,328 904.70 Orit. CoeH. = 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.90 28,713 904.90 14.47 Mufti -Stage = n/a No No No Exflaratlon - 0.000 in/hr (Wet area) TaUmter Elev. = 0.00 ft Stage / Storage / Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation Clv A tuft ft cis •ft 0.00 0 903.00 0.00 0.10 1,348 903.10 0.06 0.20 2,696 903.20 0.25 0.30 4,044 903.30 0.55 0.40 5,392 903.40 0.97 0.50 6,739 903.50 1.48 0.60 8,087 903.60 2.09 0.70 9,435 903.70 2.79 0.80 10,783 903.80 3.57 0.90 12,131 903.90 4.44 1.00 13,479 904.00 5.36 1.10 15,172 904.10 6.32 1.20 16,864 904.20 7.35 1.30 18,557 904.30 8.39 1.40 20,250 904.40 9.46 1.50 21,942 904.50 10.55 1.60 23,835 904.60 11.61 1.70 25,328 904.70 12.64 1.80 27,020 904.80 13.61 1.90 28,713 904.90 14.47 2.00 30,406 905.00 14.30 11 We. 0A"rVo "w"Im" Mw been enelyeed uMer,MM and o of control. CivB CNC CivD WrA Wr8 WrC WrO Eafil Total cfs ds cfs cis cis Cfs Cfs cis cis 0.00 - - - - - - - - 0.06 - - - - - 0.25 0.55 - - - - - - 0.97 - - - - - - - 1.48 - - 2.09 - - - - - - 2.79 - - - - - - - - 3.57 - - - - - - - - 4.44 - - - - - - - - 5.36 - - - - - - - - 6.32 7.35 - - - - - - - 8.39 9.46 - - - - - - 10.55 - - - - - - - - 11.61 - - - - - - - - 12.64 - - - - - - - - 13.61 14.47 - - - - - - 14.30 0 Pond Report Hydrallow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Wednesday, Oct 12 2005, 6:55 PM Pond No. 1 - POND 1 • Pond Data Pond storage is based on known contour areas. Conic method used. Stage / Storage Table Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sqft) Incr. Storage (cuft) Total storage (cult) 0.00 903.00 12,935 0 0 1.00 904.00 14,033 13,479 13,479 2.00 905.00 20,000 16,927 30,406 Culvert I Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] IS] [C] [D] [A] [B] [Cl [D] Rise (In) = 24.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Len (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Span (in) = 24.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest EI. (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. Barrels = 1 0 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 3.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 Invert EI. (ft) = 903.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = - - - Length (ft) = 80.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multi -Stage = No No No No Slope (%) = 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N -Value = .013 .000 .000 .000 Orit. Coen. = 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multi -Stage = n/a No No No Eufiltration a 0.000 INhr (Wet area) Taitwater Elev. = 0.00 ft na.: CL ywvodke Wblo have Dean enelYced antler FIM end oW V canbd. Stage I Storage I Discharge Table Stage Storage Elevation CtvA CNB CIvC CIvD WrA WrB WrC WrD Ezfil Total cult ft cfs Cfs cfs ds cls CIS cfs CIS eft cfa .ft 0.00 0 903.00 0.00 0'00 0.10 1,348 903.10 0.06 - - - - - - - - 0'06 0.20 2,696 903.20 0.25 - - - - - - - - 0.25 0.30 4,044 903.30 0.55 - - - - - - - - 0.55 0.40 5,392 903.40 0.97 - - - - - -- - - 0.97 0.50 6,739 903.50 1.48 - - - - - -- - - 1.48 0.60 8,087 903.60 2.09 - - - - - - - -- 2.09 0.70 9,435 903.70 2.79 - - - - - - - - 2.79 0.80 10,783 903.80 3.57 - - - - - - - - 3.57 0.90 12,131 903.90 4.44 - - - - - - - -- 4.44 1.00 13,479 904.00 5.36 - - --- - - - -- - 5.36 1.10 15,172 904.10 6.32 - - --- - - - -- - 6.32 1.20 16,864 904.20 7,35 - - -- - - - -- - 7.35 1.30 18,557 904.30 8.39 - -- - - -- - - - 8.39 1.40 20,250 904.40 9.46 - - - - - - - - 9.46 1.50 21,942 904.50 10.55 - -- - - - - - - 10.55 1.60 23,635 904.60 11.61 - - - - - - -- - 11.61 1.70 25,328 904.70 12.64 - - - - - - - - 12.64 1.80 27,020 904.80 13.61 - - -- - - -- -- - 13.61 1.90 28,713 904.90 14.47 - - - - - - - - 14.47 2.00 30,406 905.00 14.30 - - - -- - - - -- 14.30 0 -- t_^ EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA k1 1 697,063 sQ.R EXI+G DRAINAGE AREA 02 11,41- 407.W5 1'61acres40],905 9.35 sues Ir ; / I el / EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA k3 1,337,619 sq. R 39.]1 aces _ 1 _ J 1 EXISTING DRANAGE AREA k4 106.326 N.9. 2.49 eam • 1 'N0f958.800 sq. fL ARE---- , 342a r '. 3 42 acreses �f PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA 103ARRsa. 9. 2.37 acres i NOV-04-2005 10:25 CARVER COUNTY PUBLIC WKS. 9524665223 P.01/03 CARVER COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 11360 Hwy. 212 West, PO Box 300, Cologne, MN 55322-0300 Phone: (952) 466-5200 Fax: (952) 466-5223 FAX TRANSMITTAL COVER Fax Number 945d - 7- ii JO Contact Person Sha,: en ern '4 _ ✓/, *r Company Name City OF C/ i rem Sender 6111 akek &La— Descri tion/Comments /lI /X- A No. of Pages (including Cover Sheet): Date Sent: ///,//D Time Sent: If there are any problems with this transmission, please call: 3 I at ( SZ ) y(&(o — 5 Zt)7 Immediately. NOV-04-2005 10:25 CARVER COUNTY PUBLIC WKS. 9524665223 P.02iO3 CARVER COUNTY PARKS Departnicnl 11360 Highway 212 West, P.O. Box 330 of, Cologne, MN 55322-0330 Public Work>. Phone (952) 466-5250 Fax (952) 466-5223 JdfS-2003 www.eu.carver.mn.us/parks November 1, 2005 Sharmeen AI-Jaff - Chanhassen Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Halla Greens Request for a Site Plan Amendment Planning Case 05-39 Dear Ms. AI-Jaff: The Carver County Public Works Division has reviewed the request for a site plan amendment for Halla Greens as transmitted to our office by your memo dated October 21, 2005. The request is for an expansion and redesign of a club house that will be located on the property. Carver County Public Works is not opposed to the clubhouse expansion but we are concerned about the location of the proposed parking lot for the clubhouse facility. During the reconstruction and traffic signal installation at the CSAH 14 (Pioneer Trail) and TH 101 intersection in 2005, Carver County Public Works became aware of some differences of opinion between Mr. Halla and Carver County Public Works about the location of the south easement line for CSAH 14 (Pioneer Trail) as it was established in 1989. These differences of opinion are a result of some ambiguities of interpretation of the right of way documents that were signed and recorded in 1989 as part of the CSAH 14 reconstruction project. Carver County's road easement is 100 feet wide, centered on the road as it was constructed in 1989. The north line of the easement is the Lake Riley Woods south plat line. The south line off the easement is located 100 feet south of this Lake Riley Woods plat line. In review of Grading Plan Sheet 2 that was submitted as part of this request for an amendment to the development plan, the north edge of the planned parking lot is shown to be located approximately 92 feet from the south plat line of the Lake Riley Woods subdivision. This would appear to indicate that approximately 8 to 10 feet of the north edge of the parking lot will be located within the roadway easement area. The parking lot cannot infringe into the permanent roadway easement. NOV-04-2005 10:25 CRRVER COUNTY PUBLIC WKS. 9524665223 P.03iO3 Letter to City of Chanhassen November 1, 2005 Page 2 of 2 If the City of Chanhassen approves the Halla Greens site plan amendment, the Carver County Public Works Division requests that the City include a condition in the amendment requiring that any further improvements or construction related activities that occur on this development be completed outside the CSAH 14 right of way which extends 50 feet south of the centerline of CSAH 14. Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal and this consideration. If there are further questions regarding this letter, please call me at 952-466-5207. Sincerely, William J. Weckman, P.E. Assistant County Engineer Cc: Don Halla Roger Gustafson, County Engineer ws\...\R&B/General Road Maintenance/CSAH/14/Halla-Cahn Let 110105 TOTRL P.03 MoF Date: January 9, 2006 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department P By: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner U7-Yi Subject: HALLA GREENS — Request for a Site Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Variances for the construction of a golf course on property located on the southeast comer of the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard (Highway 10 1) and Pioneer Trail. Applicant: John Kosmas. Planning Case: 05-39 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on January 6, 2006. The 60 -day review period ends March 7, 2006. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on February 7, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than January 27, 2006. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or SprintlUnited) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco SCANNED Carver County GIS Mapping Application Legend Had Ten US IOpMeye yy/ W xiynreys N CSAR cw" Pam Garver Likes Pertele Cc=ty Aenel Pe 2007 Map Created on: 10-21-2005 This map was created using Carver County's Geographic Information Systems (GIS), it is a compilation of information and data from various City, County, State, and Federal offices. This map is not a surveyed or legally recorded map and is intended to be used as a reference. Carver County is not responsible for any inaccuracies contained herein. 0 0 os-_�9 Affidavit of Publication Southwest Suburban Publishing State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) CITY OF CHANHASSEN Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly swom, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized CARVER &TIES IN agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- NOTICE OF PC HEARING lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: PLANNING CASE NO. 05-39 NOTICEISHEREBYGIVENthat (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal the Chanhassen Planning newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable laws, as Commission will hold a public mended. hearingon Tuesday, January3,2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. 7�L Blvd The purpose of is hearing et is was published on the daze or dazes and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is Notice is hereby incorporated as art of this Affidavit. aid notice was cut from the columns of A consider a request fora Site Plan Y rP° P Amendment (2003-07), Conditional the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both UsePetmitAmendment(20a3-04),and inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition Variances for the construction of a and publication of the Notice: golf course on property located on the southeast corner of the abcdefg"khnnopgrstuvwxyz intersection of Great Plains Boulevard (Highway 101) and Pioneer Trail - HALLA GREENS. Applicant Don Halla. y: A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public Laurie A. Hartmann review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested Persons are invited to attend this Subscribed and sworn before me on public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this prop os Stiatmeen A1Jaff, Senior PlarmeEmailr this day of 005 salialliR ' hanh n u_ GWEN M. RADIIENZ Phone: 952.227 1134 n NO1AA1'PU&viraJ OI, on Thursday, ecembe 22, Villager -/�/cmc N/COmmdebn Elia Jn 31, 2010 45 Thursday, December 22, 2005; No. 4583) Notary Public RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $22.00 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $22.00 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $11.18 per column inch SCANNED TRANSMITTAL DATE: 10-18-05 NtOV 2 1 2005 TO: Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner @ City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd. P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 PHONE: 952.227-1134 FAX: 952.227.1110 PROJECT: Halla Greens PROJECT NUMBER: 0510 — 06 RE: Application schedule and extension ITEMS INCLUDED: Cover and extension letter 2 Pages Total Sharmeen, Attached is a signed copy of the letter requesting that our application be rescheduled and the request to extend the 60 day approval to 120 days. Please call with any questions or comments, John YFesk of... OSMAS HITECT K K DESIGN 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 e-mail: john@kkdesign.biz phone: 952.922.3226 fax: 952.922.3231 November 8, 2005 (Updated November 18, 2005) City of Chanhassen Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner 7700 Market Blvd. P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Halla Greens (Chanhassen Short Course) Pioneer Trail (CSAH 14) and Highway 101 (Great Plains Boulevard) Chanhassen, MN Sharmeen, Based on our conversation earlier today I am at this time requesting that the current application submitted to the City of Chanhassen for Halla Greens (Chanhassen Short Course) be tabled and rescheduled for the next available meeting in January, 2006. l also understand that this request changes the approval period from a 60 day requirement to 120 days Updated documents will be submitted during the first week of December, 2005 Thank you for your help with this project and will be talking to you soon concerning the various topics related to this project. Thank vou, JL4 �r_ Y�'A' �% John Kosmas �"" 952-922-3226 Lhn(a)kkdesign biz cc: Don Halla @952-445-6557 (Fax) KKD - HALLA GREENS - CUP / SPR - TABLE 10.4.05 APPLICATION 1 K K DESIGN 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD. ST.LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 (952) 922 - 3226 November 8, 2005 City of Chanhassen Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner 7700 Market Blvd. P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Halla Greens (Chanhassen Short Course) Pioneer Trail (CSAH 14) and Highway 101 (Great Plains Boulevard) Chanhassen, MN Sharmeen, Based on our conversation earlier today I am at this time requesting that the current application submitted to the City of Chanhassen for Halla Greens (Chanhassen Short Course) be tabled and rescheduled for the next available meeting. Prior to that time I will submit additional documents to be considered along with the current information. Thank you for your help with this project and will be talking to you soon concerning the various topics related to this project. Thank you, John Kosmas 952-922-3226 john@kkdesion.biz cc: Don Halla @952-445-6557 (Fax) KKD - HALLA GREENS - CUP / SPR - TABLE 10.4.05 APPLICATION 1 K K DESIGN 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD. ST.LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 (952) 922 - 3226 Lower Minnesota River Watershed District 3 Len Kremer, President Hennepin County Ron Kraemer. Vice President Dakota County Lawrence Samstad, Treasurer Scott County October 31, 2005 Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Halla Greens Dear Sharmeen: Kent Francis, Manager Carver County Edward A. Schlampp, Manager Hennepin County Terry L Schwalbe, Administrator Cell (952) 221-1089 f:� d 0 7 2075 I am attaching a copy of the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District's Project Review Requirements for the city to follow in regards to this project. If you should have any questions after reviewing our requirements, please give me a call At 952-227-1037 or my cell phone at 952-221-1089. Please be advised we are moving Tuesday, November 1, 2005 to new offices: 1600 Bavaria Road, Chaska, MN 55318 Our new phone/fax numbers are as follows: Terry Schwalbe: 952-227-1037 Joan Ellis: 952-227-1038 Fax: 952-227-1039 Please assist by having the city update their records to reflect these changes. Thank you. Sincerely, 0�Schwalbe District dministrator Attachment Scott County Government Center 200 4th Avenue West Shakopee, MN 55379 Phone: (952) 496-8842, Fax: (952) 496-8844 E-mail terrys rtioweriumcom LOWER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT PROJECT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS Who should submit? Local units of government shall submit project proposals to the LMRWD for review and comment whenever the project meets one or more of the following criteria: • The project is a residential development affecting five or more acres of land. • The project is a public/commercial/industrial development affecting one or more acres of land. • The project involves construction or reconstruction of runoff management infrastructure where the contributing watershed is five acres or more. • The project will result in diversion of surface water flows between defined subwatersheds. • The project will change intercommunity flow rates. • The project is located in the Minnesota River floodplain. Submittal requirements Project proposers shall submit to the LMRWD: • A Runoff Management Plan containing: o Property lines and delineation of lands under ownership of the project proposer. o Delineation of on-site subwatersheds and off-site subwatersheds contributing runoff to the site. o Identification of the receiving waterbody, its subwatershed, and the subwatershed's water quality category (from Figures 3-6a through 3-6g and Table 5-6 of the LMRWD Water Management Plan, 1999). o Location, alignment, and elevation of proposed and existing surface water facilities. o Delineation of existing on-site wetlands, shoreland; and/or floodplain areas. Removal or disturbance of streambank or shoreland vegetation should be avoided. The plan shall address how unavoidable disturbances to this vegetation will be mitigated. o Existing and proposed normal, 5 -year (10 -year may be substituted), and 100 -year water elevations. o All inlets to detention basins and wetlands shall be placed at or below the normal water elevation. o Existing and proposed site contour elevations relative to the NGVD, 1929. o Construction plans of all proposed surface water management facilities. o Hydrologic and hydraulic computations completed to design the proposed surface water management facilities. o Provision of outlots or easements for maintenance to detention basins, constructed wetlands, and other surface water management facilities. o Maintenance agreement between developer and local unit of government, which addresses pond inspection and sediment removal and disposal. o Documentation indicating conformance with the existing local water management plan. An Erosion Control Plan that: o Conforms to the MPCA's NPDES General Permit to Discharge Stormwater from Construction Sites. o Incorporates the appropriate best management practices (BMPs) described in the MPCA's 2000 Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas. o Contains sufficient detail to show erosion control methods on individual sites (e.g., silt fence, driveway entrances). o Meets applicable local standards. Design Criteria Runoff Management Plans shall comply with the following criteria: • The peak rate of stormwater runoff from the developed project site shall not exceed the existing peak rate of runoff for the 5 -year (10 -year may be substituted) and 100 -year return frequency critical duration storm events. • Detention basins shall be designed for the 100 -year storm event. • To the extent practical, stormwater runoff from the site after development shall conform to the LMRWD's design considerations according to the subwatershed's water quality category (Level I, II, III, IV, or V; see attached). Note to local units ofgovernment. • Regional facilities are preferred over on-site facilities for surface water management. Where regional facilities that meet LMRWD standards are in place or are planned to be constructed/installed within five years, on-site detention and treatment facilities are not required. • Where regional facilities that meet LMRWD standards are not in place and are not planned to be constructed/installed within five years, local units of government shall do one or more of the following: o Require construction of on-site detention and treatment facilities meeting LMRWD standards. o Require use of other stormwater quality treatment measures, such as in- line treatment devices or infiltration practices. o Collect an appropriate fee from the project proposer for the local unit of government to put towards construction of a future regional facility within the LMRWD. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Levels I and II Water Quality Category • A permanent pool volume below the normal outlet shall be provided which is greater than or equal to the runoff from a 2.5 -inch, 24-hour storm over the entire subwatershed for regional basins, or over the project site for on-site for on-site basins, assuming full development. • The permanent pool mean depth (pond volume/pond surface area) shall be 4-10 feet. • An emergency spillway shall be provided adequate to convey the 100 -year storm event. • Pond side slopes above the normal water level shall be no steeper than 3H:1 V when possible, and preferably flatter. A shelf with a minimum width of 10 feet extending from the normal water level to a depth of 1 foot is recommended to enhance wildlife habitat, reduce potential safety hazards, and improve access for long-term maintenance. • To prevent short-circuiting, the distance between the major inlets and normal outlet shall be maximized. • The 100 -year peak discharge rate for developed conditions shall not exceed the peak rate for existing conditions. • If possible, the outlet should be designed to allow the pond to be drained for maintenance purposes and sediment removal. • Energy dissipation structures shall be provided to prevent erosion at all stormwater inlets into the pond and at the pond outlet. • Skimmer structures shall be provided at pond outlets to remove floatables. Levels 1II, IV, and V Water Quality Category • A permanent pool volume below the normal outlet shall be provided which is greater than or equal to the runoff from a 2.0 -inch, 24-hour storm over the entire subwatershed for regional basins, or over the project site for on-site for on-site basins, assuming full development. • All other requirements (except the first) as listed for the Levels I and II water quality category shall apply. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 05-39 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning commission Will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 7, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the CouncilChambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700Market Blvd. Thepurposeof this hearing is to consider a request fora Site Plan Amendment, Conditional Use PermitAmendmentand Variances for the construction of golf courseon Property located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard (Highway 101) and Pioneer Trail - HALLA GREENS Applicant: John Kosmas. A plan showing the location of the Proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. SharmeenAl- Jaff, Senior Planner Email: saltfMciclhanhassen n a Phone: 952-227a 1134 (Published in the Chanhassen villager on Thursday, January 26, 2006; No. 4599) 0 0 Affidavit of Publication Southwest Suburban Publishing State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. '15 9 9 was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghijkhnnopgrs vwxyz I Laurie A. Hartmann Subscribed and sworn before me on this d Agdayof7�'!"` 2006 GWEN M. RADANZ Es NMAW KMW -10#WA / kqr, don6ginJrL31,2710 Notary Public RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $40.00 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $40.00 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter.._ ........................................... $11.51 per column inch SCANNED Page 1 of 1 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: thomas anderson [andersonthomase@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 3:12 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: Halla Greens Sharmeen, My name is Tom Anderson. I live in Lake Riley Woods behind David Gatto's house. I am very concerned with the proposed changes that are being added to the conditional use permit for Hala Greens. The change that alarms me the most is the addition of the parking lot lights. The back of my house faces Pioneer Trail and already we have seen dramatic increases in traffic. Parking lot lights across the road would light up the inside of my house and I would have no say in when they went on and off. Please take this into condideration when you are discussing the additions. It seems to me a bit misleading when certain things are agreed upon and then we have to defend ourselves aginst a bunch of additional items. I will be in attendance at this evening's meeting. Sincerely, Tom Anderson Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. 2/7/2006 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Walstad, David P [DWALSTAD@amfam.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 11:32 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: Halla Greens Comments for 2/7/06 Planning Commission Mtg Sharmeen, My wife and I live at 10071 Great Plains Blvd, which is directly South of the Halla Greens property. I am out of the state and will not be able to attend the 2/7/06 Planning Commission meeting, so I wanted to email you with some comments, questions and concerns over the Halla Greens proposal. Please include this in the written comments for the Planning Commission meeting. We are very concerned and upset over the requests to expand the proposal far beyond what was originally represented and approved, especially when there have been several incidents where prior approvals, permits, and agreements have been violated or ignored. The new proposal from applicants Don Halla and KK Design dated January 6, 2006 differs drastically from the prior proposals from Ron Saatzer and Herfort Norby Golf Course Architects. Is this the same ownership entity as initially proposed? It seems that there are different principals, different designers, and a vastly different operation plan for this property than what was presented in prior meetings. It's hard to see how this is just a site plan and conditional use "amendment". It seems to be an entirely new operation and proposal from different principals. The January 6, 2006 letter from John Kosmas includes several statements under section 5. Lighting that have absolutely nothing to do with lighting or safety issues, and clearly show intent to develop this land far beyond what was represented or approved. Expansion of Operations: The initial requirement was for no exterior lighting. After earlier reviews, the proposal was amended to "No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety light." Now, according to the applicant, it is necessary to light up the parking lot with 27' towers, light up all of the buildings inside and out throughout the evening hours, add a miniature golf course with lights, add lights to the driving range, stay open from 6:OOam to 11:OOpm, and stay open year round in order to provide safety lights. This is ridiculous, and clearly designed as either property protection or income generation devices. Exterior Lighting: On the surface, it appears reasonable to have parking lot lighting for personal safety, but Bluff Creek golf course has no parking lot lights. If the hours and seasonal nature of the business are not extended, there is no reason to have lights on all night. If the concern is truly for personal safety, and it's deemed necessary to have parking lot lights, they should be put on timers to shut off after the business is closed. We do not support all night lighting solely for personal property protection. If that is a major concern, the applicant should install an alarm system. Miniature Golf Course: John Kosmas makes the statement (not a request) that "The course currently includes a driving range and in the future a family miniature golf course, both of with require the use of lighting during the evening hours of operation." What miniature golf course? The proposal does not "currently" include this and there is to be no "evening hours of operation". A miniature golf course is not a golf course, and is not considered as such by the City's zoning district codes for permitted, accessory or conditional uses. The City website lists miniature golf courses separately as permitted in zoning districts BH -Highway Business or BG -General Business, and conditional in BF -Fringe Business. None of these apply to this property. We are not located in a business district and do not want to tum this area into one. I don't see where the Planning Commission letter dated 2/7/06 specifically addresses this issue. I would like to see the denial of a miniature golf course on this premises in writing in the document. Year Round Operation, Hours of Business: We strongly oppose year round operation. Operation of what? Hardly to sell a few sandwiches and coffee, as the applicant's proposal states. It is not necessary for a golf course to be open year round. We strongly oppose keeping the driving range open year round and lighting it. There is already a business 1 mile south of this Property that provides this service to the general public in a area that is appropriately zoned for it. This golf course attained approval by representing it was seasonal use only, as a sunrise to sunset operation. We strongly Oppose any expansion of this for either winter use or from 6:OOam to 11:OOam. Please clarify what "sunrise to sunset" means, as we are concerned over the vagueness of the wording. Sunrise and sunset are exact times of day that vary by day. Does this mean that no public is to be on the golf course after sunset, or that they also have to have left the clubhouse? If sunset is 9:30pm, how long after that are people allowed to sit in the outside veranda's? What about hours for mowing, collecting range balls, and other maintenance? The concern is over noise and lighting. I feel that this should be clarified to the applicant and the neighbors. Lighting the Driving Range: Also listed under the "Lighting" section is "Lighting for the driving range is currently being evaluated and the information should be available shortly." Again, they imply that this is already acceptable and assume they can light the driving range and operate year round. There is no reason to light a driving range that is open from sunrise to sunset. Private Road Usage and Easement Rights : The state highway to the west and county road to the north are addressed, but not the private road to the south. This golf course has been under construction for 2 years, and the applicant's have been using the private gravel road that boards the south side of this property on a regular basis during the construction time. This is not part of the Halla Greens property. The people with properties on this road (including myself) have easement rights. I believe this road is on property owned by Tom & Kathleen Gertz and Dave Teich. I would like to clarify in writing fust, that there is to be no public access to the golf course via this road, and second, whether the golf course entity has any legal easement rights to use this road for construction or maintenance purposes. Doesn't the golf course entity have to have easement rights to use this road? This is the same road that MN DOT refers to in it's letter dated November 23, 2005, in which they say "If Halla Greens is using the gravel access road, they must apply for a Mn/DOT access permit." Have they applied for a permit? The wear and tear on this gravel road increases dramatically with heavy truck usage, especially in the spring and fall when ground moisture is high. Water Runoff Onto Neighboring Properties: The applicant has added an elevated dirt berm on the south side of the property that abuts the private gravel road. There is no ditch between the birm and the road, and so with this design, water runs off from the birm directly onto the gravel road surface. This was done late in 2005, and my concern is that this will lead to an increase in water on the road surface which results in potholes and increased maintenance costs. This should be corrected, as there shouldn't be additional runoff directed onto the road. Landscaping: The prior proposal included minimum standards and the applicant's proposal for trees and shrubs along the south and east sides of the property (Page 10, Chanhassen Short Course Staff Report, September 2, 2003. The newest documents make no reference to this at all. What happened to them? What is the status of the landscaping plan in this area? Site Plan Map: The site map provided is dated August 2003, and does not show the location of the new buildings or changes to the landscape plans. Where are the training shed and ball washing building to be located? We are well aware that there are acceptable conditional uses of this property, and in the past, we had supported the golf course development as the prior applicant was willing to listen to the neighborhood's concerns and incorporate them into it's design. Apparently, this is no longer the case. The tone and content of the applicant's January 6, 2006 proposal makes it clear that they have no concerns over the neighborhood impact or for city zoning and usage requirements. We realize the city and the commissions hear complaints from neighbors on most zoning issues, but we feel strongly that this proposal goes far beyond reasonable use of this property and is detrimental to the neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration. Dave & Judy Walstad 10071 Great Plains Blvd Chanhassen, MN Page 1 of 1 Al-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Elizabeth Mikkelsen lelizabeth.mikkelsen@zimmer.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 4:08 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: Halla Golf Course Hi Sharmeen — I live on Foxford Road — close to Pioneer Trail, so we are one of the houses that will be most effected by any major developments at the golf course. Can you answer a few questions for me? 11 Since the land on which the golf course is now situated, was originally slated/proposed as a housing development — what is it zoned? I would not think that zoning for a housing development and zoning for a full service golf course would be identical — but can you tell me if this is so? 2) Why is the city allowing a zoning change if the two zoning ordinances are different? 3) What is a "done deal" at this point? The original, non -lighted course, of course, but what else will be non- negotiable? Have other approvals been made or agreements made with Halla of which the homeowners are unaware? 4) No lights were ever approved — it was to be a day -light course only. Yet, as we watched construction of the course and parking lot, we saw wiring/lighting bases being installed. Why was Halla allowed to complete this activity without discussion/permission? Having a full service, 24/7 type of lighting golf course is way beyond the scope of what was originally proposed, To allow for night use/lighting will ruin the ability of homeowners to use our property to the fullest extent. The noise associated with a late night course, the additional traffic that a lighted course will draw; the light pollution and the inability of homeowners to see their own night sky will truly detract from home values and quality of life. Why must tax -paying residents have to fight to maintain their quality if life and place of residents. We bought property in this neighborhood so that we could have land and a somewhat rural setting close to Chanhassen. Why is a developer being allowed to undertake a major modification in context and intent? Why did City Inspectors not stop these modifications while they were going in versus having the residents have to fight 'after the fact"? If you could shed some light on this subject — I'd really appreciate it. Any or all help you can provide would be great. Thanks so much Elizabeth Smith Mikkelsen 9591 Foxford Road Elizabeth Smith Mikkelsen Director, Clinical Affairs Zimmer Spine 952-830-6306 phone 952-857-5656 fax 952-837-6906 efax elizabeth.mikkelsen@zimmer.com 2/7/2006 Page i of 1 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Jimhautman@aol.com Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 11:04 AM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: halla meeting Attachments: ATT37818.txt Sharmeen, My name is Jim Hautman, I live at 11095 great plains blvd., on the southern border of the halla golf course site. Unfortunately I will be unable to attend the meeting tuesday, and was hoping to voice my opinion by email. I live and work at home and see daily the illegal dumping of trash etc. from Halla nursery[ see photos, obtained legally]. the dump site is just feet away from my property and so the trash evetually washes onto my property. Since the start of the golf course it is now also the golf course dump site. I'm afraid next it will also be a restaurant dump. I know you have tried to stop them and I appreciate that. I just want to reaffirm it's continuing, and if there is anything I can do to help you stop it, let me know. 1 am also opposed to lights at the course, I was assured by Ron Saatzer when he was involved that it would be daylight hours, no lights. Besides there is already a lighted range a mile away. I am opposed to many other things Halla nursary does, but I feel these two have the biggest negative effect on the neighborhood and the environment. Thanks for your time, I hear only good things about you and your work. Jim Hautman 2/7/2006 Page 1 of 3 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Weread4fun@aol.com Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 2:18 PM To: AWaff, Sharmeen Subject: Halla Greens February 4, 2006 To Sharmeen AI-Jaff and the Chanhassen City Council: I am writing with regard to the planning commission's staff report concerning Halla Greens. I live in the white colonial house directly behind Dave and Judy Walstad's home and have owned my land for almost a dozen years. Over these many years, I have seen how disrespectfiilly Don Halla treats the neighbors on this side of Pioneer Trail and how he creates his own rules to suit his wishes, no matter what we and the City of Chanhassen have to say. Though Halla Nursery's big trucks use the access road in front of our homes many times daily during the growing season, he has never once offered to help repair the ruts left by his heavy machinery. In fact, he has claimed that he has a right not to be responsible, since he was here first. He continues to dump loads of waste from Halla Nursery an average of once a day during the summer into the ravine near Jim and Dorothy Hauptmann's home despite being asked numerous times by the City and the neighbors to stop. Is this legal? Though I was optimistic about the Chanhassen Short Course when it was initially proposed by Ron Saatser and Don Halla, and spoke in favor of it in 2003 at a city council meeting, I am very concerned with the site plan amendments and variances he and John Kosmas have now proposed. Those items and my concerns are listed below. First, in the initial plans that were approved in the fall of 2003, there were four items of profound importance to the neighbors: 1. Hours of operation will be seasonal, limited from sunrise to sunset. 2. No outdoor speaker system is permitted. 3. No commercial kitchen shall be permitted in the clubhouse. 4. No exterior lighting shall be permitted with the exception of safety lights. 1. I do not believe the hours of operation should be changed from what were initially proposed. They should be limited to seasonal use from sunrise to sunset, and strictly enforced as originally agreed to. The land is zoned for agricultural use, and while running a golf course fits within these guidelines, the extended hours and year-round operation proposed by John Kosmas sound more like a commercial restaurant/business use than an agricultural use of land. 2. I would like to reiterate that there should be no outdoor speaker system. (Halla Nursery already has one of these that we can hear on warm and breezy days.) 2/7/2006 Page 2 of 3 3. The original (2003) intent of not permitting a commercial kitchen was because the primary use of land was as an executiveof course. Ron Saatser explained his dream of creating the course so that children, teenagers and families could enjoy the game of golf. The clubhouse was simply a place to buy a Coke on a hot day or grab a snack or a sandwich. It was not supposed to be a restaurant with screened porches that served as a business in its own right, encouraging people to stay well after their round had finished. If patrons leave at 11 pm, it is reasonable to believe that employees will be cleaning up and closing around midnight. As neighbors, we find this unacceptable because the new amendments and variances Halla and Kosmas have applied for are not minor changes, but major differences in the way the operation would be run. Neither Halla or Kosmas have approached the neighbors (as Ron Saatser did) to gather our input. 4. I strenuously object to any exterior lighting, except one or two lights fastened to the buildings for safety reasons or a maximum of three safety lights, not to exceed fifteen feet tall, no matter how large the Halla Greens parking lot is. Just as granting the extended business hours in the variance will "be considered an annoyance to the neighbors in the early morning and evening hour; contrary to the original use permit," so will these lights be considered an annoyance. Not only will they be a source of light pollution and change our views, but this is in direct violation of the initial agreement in 2003. I am also concerned that if you allow Mr. Halla to add lights, he will push to have longer hours. I believe the city needs to be very firm with Mr. Halla regarding this point or we will end up with a lighted parking lot and the additional lights he has mentioned for his driving range and miniature golf course. This is more in line with the look of an amusement park or a car sales lot in front of our homes, rather than the golf course we envisioned! Again, this smacks more of commercial zoning which is not approved for this area rather than the agricultural zoning which is. John Kosmas has already referred to the use of outdoor lights after dark for the benefit of the patrons of the restaurant and, by remaining on all night, to prevent vandalism. This is unacceptable. This has more to do with property protection than safety. Mr. Halla does not have bright lights on during the night at his Nursery, and this is something I have told him repeatedly how much we and the other neighbors appreciate. I understand having a few lights for safety, but if the golf course opens at dawn and closes at dusk, there should be no need for further lighting. Finally, I am concerned about the current gravel road that borders the golf course. This is the road we neighbors use to access our property. We were told in 2003 that this road would not be used by golf course patrons or for maintenance, yet the orange construction fabric meant to be a buffer between the course and the road was removed so heavy machines could access our road during construction. Once again, Mr. Halla pushed past the boundaries set by the City and the good faith agreement we had in going forward with the creation of the golf course. Since Eric Olson has been in charge, this has improved, however, we still have had to spend money to repair our road several times and I had to fix my car's tie rod when it was impaired due to the road's damage from the golf course equipment. This is the road Mr. Halla's nursery trucks use to reach the ravine for dumping. What is to stop him from dumping the waste from his golf course there as well? Since the Halla tree lot no longer exists, I believe there is no valid reason for Halla trucks to utilize this road any more. It is meant to be an easement for my neighbors and me, not a commercial road. If it is within your jurisdiction, I would like you to agree there should be no use of this gravel easement for any Halla business use whatsoever. (As far as we know, the "current business use" is entirely for access to the golf course and to access the ravine for dumping.) Based on Don Halla's years of disregard for the rules and guidelines from the City of 2/7/2006 Page 3 of 3 Chanhassen, pertaining to the dumping and to the original conditional use permit for the golf course— You may know of others—I am very concerned that he will continue to push the limits in every way Possible. Please examine how Halla Nursery has grown over the years and consider the way the Chanhassen Short Course has grown into the proposed extravagant plan for Halla Greens—complete with a miniature golf course, lighted parking lot (with 104 spaces), more outbuildings (with plans for expansion already mentioned), then use all the resources at your disposal to limit Halla Greens impact on the neighbors and the environment. Thank you. Sincerely, Gaye Guyton 10083 Great Plains Blvd 952-445-1034 2/7/2006 05-35 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 27, 2006 Mayor Furlong called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Furlong, Councilman Lundquist, Councilwoman Tjomhom and Councilman Peterson COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilman Labatt STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Elliott Knetsch, Justin Miller, Paul Oehme and Kate Aanenson PUBLIC PRESENT FOR ALL ITEMS: Janet D. Paulsen Debbie Lloyd Jon Agrimson Kari Nettesheim Jerry McDonald David Jansen PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: 7305 Laredo Drive 7302 Laredo Drive 12397 Jack Pine Trail 9151 Great Plains Boulevard Planning Commission Chanhassen Villager Mayor Furlong: Thank you and good evening to everyone here with us in the council chambers, as well as those watching at home. We're glad you joined us. At this time I'd like to make an announcement regarding our agenda as well as add an item to it, then open it up to the council to add additional items or modify it. First of all, just for point of clarification, if there are people here this evening for the Halla Greens matter, that has been pulled off tonight. We will not be discussing that this evening. We expect that to return at our next meeting, our first meeting in March. So if there are people here for that, we will not be discussing that this evening. Also based upon our work session, the item under work session C, which is the discussion related to the motor vehicles sales tax constitutional amendment. We will be adding that as item 1(m) this evening on our consent agenda. So at this point I would ask if there's any other modifications or changes related to the agenda. If not, with that addition we will proceed. At this point I would like to consider the consent agenda. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman Peterson moved, Councilman Lundquist seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: a. Approval of Minutes: -City Council Work Session Minutes dated February 13, 2006 -City Council Verbatim & Summary Minutes dated February 13, 2006 FAX COVER SHEET Date: Company: 7700 Market Blvd. Attention: O–V\- �' P.D. Box 147 a Chanhassen, MN 55317 Fax Number: 171 — l 13 General Phone: 952-227-1100 Sent By: Administrative Far 952-227-1110 Ridg/Lnspecdons Fax: 952-227-1190 Direct Dial No: Engineering Far 952-227-1170 ParkMecreation Fax: 952-227-1110 Planning Far 952-227-1110 Sending _�5 pages, including cover page. Public Works Far 952-227-1310 Recreation Center Far 952-227-1404 ❑ Please find the information you requested Web Address: www.cEchanhasseminn.us ❑ Please review and call me ❑ Please call to confirm receipt of this fax If you do not receive all pages, or are experiencing other problems in transmission, please call the sender at his or her direct dial number. Cl CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 01/05/2006 12:42:14 PM Receipt No. 0000233 CLERK: danielle PAYEE: Halla Greens LLC GIS list 0 ------------------------------------------------------- GIS List 93.00 Total Cash Check 1140 Change 93.00 0.00 93.00 0.00 ©s -3q SCANNED r City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 My OF (952) 227-1100 MIMI To: Don Halla 6601 Mohawk Trail Edina, MN 55439 Ship To: 11 Invoice SALESPERSON DATE TERMS KT M 11/3/05 upon receipt NOTE: This invoice is in accordance with the Development Review Application submitted to the City by the Addressee shown above (copy attached). Make all checks payable to: City of Chanhassen Please write the following code on your check: Planning Case #05-39 Halla Greens. If you have any questions concerning this invoice, call: (952)-227-1107. THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS! SCANNED O0... Ofy Minnesota Department of Transportation �� Metropolitan District Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville MN 55113-3174 February 6, 2006 Sharmeen AI-Jaff City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Halla Greens Mn/DOT Review #S05 -103A SE Quad of TH 101 and Pioneer Trail (CSAH 14) Chanhassen, Carver County Control Section 1009 Dear Ms. AI-Jaff: REC!Z1V'EL' FEB ') 2006 Cl7y OF CHANHASSEN Thank you for the opportunity to review Halla Greens. Mn/DOT's staff has reviewed the site plan and has the following comments: Surface Water Runoff A Mn/DOT drainage permit shall be required. A grading plan depicting the correct Right of Way lines is needed. The City or project developer will need to submit before/after hydraulic computations for the 100 year rainfall event verifying that all existing drainage patterns and systems affecting Mn/DOT right of way will be perpetuated. In addition, please submit information documenting the performance of the pond located at the northwest corner of the golf course (located immediately East of the Hole #9 green). Drainage runoff rates to Mn/DOT right of way for the proposed condition must not increase over the existing condition, and drainage patterns must not change. Please direct questions regarding drainage issues to Bryce Fossand (651-634-2408) of Mn/DOT's Water Resources Engineering Section. Design For liability reasons, steps should be taken to insure that errant golf balls do not enter the TH 101 Right of Way, or the TH 101 driving/turning lanes. For questions on this, please call Ken Ljung (651-634-2113) of Mn/DOT's District Design Office. Permits The berm has been constructed on Mn/DOT Right of Way and needs to be removed. Mn/DOT has had major drainage problems (flooding) on TH 101 due to this berm. As mentioned earlier, a drainage permit is required. Any use of or work within or affecting Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/tecsur)/utility. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. An equal opportunity employer County State Aid Highway (CSAH) Requirements As a reminder, CSAH 14 is a County State Aid Highway (CSAH) Route. Any work on a CSAH route must meet State Aid rules and policies. • http://www.dot.state.mn.us/stateaid/ shows or has links to the applicable forms and the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual. • Refer to the Mn/DOT State Aid Manual, Chapter 5-892.200 for information regarding standards and policies. • Please go to http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/arule/8820/ for information regarding State Aid Operations Rules Chapter 8820. For driveway standards, the designer is directed to refer to the Mn/DOT Road Design Manual (English) Table 5-3.04A and Figure 5-3.04A for guidance and policies. Please contact Jim Deeny in our State Aid section at (651) 582-1389 with any additional questions. Please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Reviews Coordinator Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's review and response to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions concerning this review please contact me at (651) 634-2083. Sincerely, Jonathan Os and Transportn Planner Enclosures: Mn/DOT letter dated November 23, 2005 Copy: John Freemyer, Carver County Surveyor Roger Gustafson, Carver County Engineer Kevin Norby, Herfort Norby Golf Course Architects, Eden Prairie, MN John Kosmas, K.K. Design, Minneapolis, MN Mn/DOT Review #S05 -103A 2 2/6/2006 Copies to Mn/DOT Metro Division files: Mn/DOT Division File C.S. 1009 Mn/DOT LGL File - City of Chanhassen Copies distributed via Groupwise: Tod Sherman Cindy Carlsson Buck Craig Soosan Nichols Ken Ljung Bryce Fossand Lynn Clarkowski Ann Braden / Metropolitan Council Roger Gustafson Carver County Engineer 11360 Highway 212 West P.O. Box 300 Cologne, MN 55322-0300 John Freemyer Carver County Surveyor 600 East 4`" Street Chaska, MN 55318 John Kosmas K.K. Design 6112 Excelsior Blvd Minneapolis, MN 55416 Kevin Norby Hefort Norby Golf Course Architects 6452 City West Parkway Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Mn/DOT Review #S05 -103A 3 2/6/2006 BENCHMARK • Delivering The Student Experience • Technology Training for Business & IT Professionals �I tLa stjoe1- ('0USL To� Cv)g4145u l e,v ,5 hELD-7 A -T- 30' VD1 = LgL7 k z(o5' = I 9t�CC•T, W ILL 21 05,52,3/0003o Comrnor,\ borfovv(Cv) v -Grorn rnt-4pOT pri[.P hook AZEA of &Fkm =r, J 2b5 x (►s' t is- ' 2') _ SLI RD n( oe 9'i.�s u qtr • � J gi • I J /� i :rte _ r N . EjC P_0yJ AMID FILL_ W< IMAL 3,jap00 _EkCS,OtJ COOTgtj, 1 0373D • its-F3u«T 4SDOOb -t7,23?'DI►o°1o=�7,91,03 -:�S,cw SeZu2tTy RED`S W00 M o a o�0 o _o aJ rn O Chanhassen, Minnesota' SCORECARD HOLE PAR BLUE WHITE RED 1 3 153 137 117 2 3 158 143 123 3 3 122 101 85 4 3 174 160/141 125 5 3 133 120 105 6 4 300 275 255 7 3 145 130 115 8 4 324 304 271 9 3 110 95 80 TOTALS 29 1,619 1,475/1,456 1,270 Tabulation Box 1. Parcel Size: 45.9954 acres 2. Gross Floor Area Clubhouse: 1,440 sf Storage/Maintenance 2,400 sf 3. Building Area %: 0.2% 4. Impervious Surface Area %: 2.4% 5. Parking Area %: 2.2% 6. Projected Number of Employees: 6 7 Number of Seats: 30 8. Parking Spaces Required Total: Handicapped: - 9. Parking Spaces Provided Total: 80 Handicapped: 2 10. Building Heights Clubhouse: 15' Storage Maintenance Building: 20' © This plan and the concepts represented herein are the property of Herfort-Norby Golf Course Architects. Use of this plan shall require priorwritten approval by Herfod-Norby Golf Course Architects. SITE EX. TO CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED JUL 1 8 2003 CHARHASSEN PLANNING DEPT EX. i /Opose f i i Irrigation Well i i/ O �14 Owner: Ron Saker 9450 Foxford Road Ctlanhasseb, Minnesota 55318 P (952) 402-0777 7 Goff Course Architect: Herfort Norbv Golf Course Architects Golf Course Architecture Landscape Architecture Site Planning 6452 City West Parkway / Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 P (952) 942-0266 F (952) 942-0197 EX GRAVEL I� r II Engineer Sathre-Berquist, Inc. 150 South Broadway Wayzata, Minnesota 55347 P (952) 476-6000 Oi aiz 920 >---920 1 — -- Pond - - - i �< n__J� (5 - - -- I age M IMlint. Clubhouse BI g. g70 �� Cl Green Well- �_ F Drinking Water �'- I Pump, House ---- l 1 rrrr� 1 .r —� Septic Site A: 20 50' x 100 Irrigation - ---- EVVAY Revisions: Septic Site B:g2.2 50'x100 — 2 rI�/ X920 f+; -,918 916 i4 V -197[- Pond 97nPond A \ v �e X890 1 � 9 6s„ (1 July 18, 2003 © This plan and the concepts represented herein are I hereby certify that this plan, ition ore ort was prepared by me or under my di R s =slon and that the property of Herfort-Norby Golf Course Architects. I am a duly registered Land ape chaed ender the Use of this plan shall require prior written approval laws of the State f Min esoh,. by Herfort-Norby Golf Course Architects. Signed: '1 t1I Date: Reghtratlon ♦: _%011 EX. BINS � l I 1 EX. ENTRANCE TO REMAIN 1 � r f .r !. Existing j Trees to Remaiµ / 1 Existing s"f Trees to Remain Existing 'J Trees to I ' Remain I ' �, f '9� ' 1 - - I - + Pump /I House / + T- � / r�24: $'e X Existing �W 1976_.1 f -4-1Trees to 1 � Remain II" . 1 C■ GRAVEL 9; NvN -- � NWL: 908.0 916--- 080 6--f080 BOT: 898.5 �.,,...... COnatryCtiOn Entrance Existing Trees to -- Remain IttltHlllllll FIFE: 912.2 1 - Pradl� Green in 914 Practice Septic Range SKe A Pond NWL: 919.0" i HWL: 920.2Septic BOT: 909.0 614: ''., Site 8 g1z, ._ f 4.vs' i922la,, 916, M11ga1ion � �1 r � / -4924)., Existing /i Trees to r i i� Remain i �14 - 924'1. v 924'- DRIVEW Y e arr/ - \ X14*' 916r Existing - Trees to Remain '1 14 NWL: 903.0 HWL: 904.0 BOT: 898.0 pVl 1/ Pond — ) Bluf L ne -- a r77�i t n O O 170 _o N O O ■ aaa� O N O A z N M � cn a � O N '> _ z ro � 6 m � i� I� w CP 7 N N Wz � Q, W •-' 0 r O C) 0 {d N LZ. x N IN V/ IMn Lf1 Cd 3-1 - �D °O 0 = U U drI U w N C N 0 L Nv rn C� v LU `O w O N IL Ln a T CL m O LIF, N Z a' O �D N C: � � 0 o " N Ln 02 o L 0) Ln rn f a L U a 15 0 n C a Vj 4 d �s � cn a � O N '> _ z ro � 6 m � i� I� w CP 7 N N Wz � Q, W •-' r O C) 0 {d N LZ. x IN V/ IMn Lf1 Cd 3-1 - �D °O 0 = U U drI U w N C N 0 L Nv rn C� v LU `O w O N IL Ln a .--r :„BILn'o N '> _ z ro � 6 m � i� I� C � CP 7 N N LU �'r° ��Z �C)'oaLL V) rn C) 0 {d N IN V/ IMn Lf1 L a DU d Z� Za ��,� V) 0 = U U drI U w N C N 0 L Nv rn C� v LU `O w O N IL Ln rn CL m O LIF, N Z a' O �D N C: � � 0 o " N Ln 02 o L 0) Ln rn f a L U Buffer Yard Planting Schedule North Buffer Yard along Pioneer Trail West Buffer Yard Overstory Trees Req'd Prop. x American Linden Tilia americana width) x i5"/o = .I3.tS Adjacent Land Use - Large Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica low density residential 6 m Red Oak Quercus rubra 0 River Birch Betula nigra N Sugar Maple Acer saccharum 4-J E 2 x 5.2 = 10.4 10 10 Understory Trees C Colorado Spruce Picea pungens Scotch Pine Pinus sylvestris C) V) x Flowering Crabapple Malus sp. N a 4x5.2=20.8 1 21 21 Shrubs Black Chokeberry Picea pungens 7 d z Cardinal Dogwood Cornus sericea LL Common Purple Lilac Syringia vulgaris i - 0 6 x 5.2 = 31.2 1 31 31 Type B: 1,300'(length)/100' x .4 (30' width) x 100% = 5.2 Adjacent Land Use - Road East Buffer Yard Overstory Trees Req'd Prop. x American Linden Tilia americana width) x i5"/o = .I3.tS Adjacent Land Use - Large Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica low density residential 6 m Red Oak Quercus rubra 0 River Birch Betula nigra N Sugar Maple Acer saccharum 4-J E 2x3.63=7.26 7 7 Understory Trees C Colorado Spruce Picea pungens Scotch Pine Pinus sylvestris C) V) x Flowering Crabapple Malus sp. N a 4x3.63=14.52 1 15 15 Shrubs Black Chokeberry Picea pungens 7 d z Cardinal Dogwood Cornus sericea LL Common Purple Lilac Syringia vulgaris i - 0 6 x 3.63 = 21.78 1 22 22 Type B: 1,210'(length)/100' x .4 (3U' width) x 15"/o = a.t)3 Adjacent Land Use - Large lot & low density residential South & Southwest Buffer Yard Overstory Trees Req'd Prop. x American Linden Tilia americana width) x i5"/o = .I3.tS Adjacent Land Use - Large Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica low density residential 6 m Red Oak Quercus rubra 0 River Birch Betula nigra N Sugar Maple JAcersaccharuin 4-J E 2 x 13.8 = 27.6 1 28 40 Understory Trees C Colorado Spruce Picea pungens Scotch Pine Pinus sylvestris C) V) x Flowering Crabapple Malus sp. N a 4 x 13.8 = 55.2 Total 55 25 Shrubs Black Chokeberry Picea pungens 7 d z Cardinal Dogwood Conius sericea LL Common Purple Lilac Syringia vulgaris i - 0 6 x 13.8 = 82.8 1 83 250 Type B: 1,800'(length)/100' x .4 (3U' width) x i5"/o = .I3.tS Adjacent Land Use - Large lot & low density residential I hereby 7""' "a' this pian, etlEta. n or sport was prepared by me or under my di R sM:n and that I am a duly registered Lands pe R under the laws of the State Min signed:- yy _--f Date: QL aegistratlon *:-L-?, DI l7 © This plan and the concepts represented herein are the property of Herfort-Norby Golf Course Architects. Use of this plan shall require prior written approval by Herfort-Norby Golf Course Architects. Overstory Trees Req'd Prop. American Linden Tilia americana L: o to o Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica �z (3)�z�� 6 m Red Oak Quercus rubra 0 River Birch Betula nigra N Sugar Maple Acer saccharum 4-J E 2x5.64=11.28 11 11 Understory Trees C Colorado Spruce Picea pungens Scotch Pine Pinus sylvestris C) V) x Flowering Crabapple Malus sp. N a 4 x 5.64 = 22.56 Total 23 23 Shrubs Black Chokeberry Picea pungens 7 d z Cardinal Dogwood Cornus seficea LL Common Purple Lilac Syringia vulgaris i - 0 6 x 5.64 = 33.84 1 1 34 34 Type B- 1,410'(length)/100' x .4 (30' width) x 1U0% = 5.64 1) ,t i Adjacent Land Use - Road Note: Not more than 20% of a single species will be used on the site. `�- I ry, -': _ Existing - Trees to �� T - I LI -4 I Remain ttt } Pond I - f, Existing I, � t 1 1 � Ip I V ._--• 3 Trees to Remain Trees to Remain I _ -� / refer to Sheet 4 ynF Y D / .+� Pump !Ho>use' irrliiurii� ft / Septic r r ( i Site A Irrigation / Pond / Septic Site B 4 � Existing Trees to \ i + Remam \ o sed Existing ', / - -171 ! Trees to /' �1 Existih Gra ai Remain \ eali / A EX. SINS ,j EX. ENTRANCE TO REMAIN \ Existing Trees to Remain �U \ Pond 2 r- Existing Trees to -__ t..._.....,, Remain ``--- -xfYa?gttYyv tTYS4('- ° .......... 1f4f f.1,9Yt PTf1 f'r ) �.yp - IIsIIj sar T1MT}'ffP SMfi F-0f:{f16?iTfi• EX. RAVEL I fn I rn =a M O O L: o to o 0 �z (3)�z�� 6 m p wz 0 C9 N LU N 4-J E �aU- V) C C) °o C) V) x `' N a T A YLr) N Lr) 7 d z ZQv" LL L i - 0 vV dao 0 U`t- N C N 4 � 0 iD U-1 rry /rO'�t v Ln d 00 2 L.r, a�o (U p D =a M O O L: o to o V) �z (3)�z�� 6 m p wz C9 N LU ,--1 4-J E �aU- V) C) °o C) V) x `' N a =a M O O L: o to o ,'?o (3)�z�� 6 m � n n C9 N LU v In (3� M @L �aU- V) r\ C) 0 N A YLr) N Lr) LZLr) d z ZQv" LL L i - 0 vV dao 0 U`t- N C N 4 � iD U-1 rry /rO'�t v Ln d 00 2 L.r, a�o (U p D K N ��2�V, OX C u- N Q O (01 d' m a rn U Clubhouse Planting Schedule Code Common Name Botanical Name Size Notes Quanity Overstory Trees AL American Linden Tilia americana 3" MM on site 2 GA 'Summit' Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Summit' 3" MM on site 4 RO Red Oak Quercus rubrum 3" MM on site 1 SM Red Oak Acer Saccharum 3" MM on site 2 Shrubs AW 'Anthony Waterer Spirea Spirea x bumalda Anthony Waterer' 24" 4' OC 6 CV Compact American Viburnum Viburnum trilobum 36" 2 DN Dwarf Ninebark Physocarpus opufolius 'Nanus' 30" w 6 LP 'Little Princess' Spirea Spirea japonica 'Little Princess' 24" 30C 3 MK 'Miss Kim' Lilac I Syringia patula 'Miss Kim' 36" 4 MW 'Minuet' Wiegela Wiegela Florida 'Minuet' 24" 30C 3 Perennials & Annuals V) X C Tulips - Pink Tulipa sp. Bulb 8" OC 80 AN Wave Petunias - Pink Petunia sp. ea. 8" OC 80 I hereby certify that this plan, ecMk "nor reportwas prepared by me or under my di R s< a un and that I am a duty registered Land ape 4chked under the laws of the "am Min eso[a. Sgned:A Date: - ^k]5 Regishatlan Y: 7.0114 © This plan and the concepts represented herein are the property of Herfort-Norby Golf Course Architects. Use of this plan shall require prior written approval by Herfort-Norby Golf Course Architects. 8' Wi i'tu Cart Path Clubhouse 3 24' x 60' aw 1,440 sf Concrete Patio iQ O Well - Drinking Water Masonry Sign U Cart Staging [ - - J Trash Screen with 5' Fence Insurmountable concrete curb - typical st Tee C)M� a� �IMFo B Lr, l� o (3) _ = "Z�� �m2:VV 0 Lr) Ln LU Ln N 01 01 t T v ru Ln a LL V) H 0 n 01 N O N N LM N Lf1 In L Q -2 2 Z 2 Z a LL O O �_ N O 0 2 U U U w N C N O Lr) N w (D "r O 11' N IO V Ln _T O u a 00 M M n _ 0 Ln n N a'ZO o o V) X C r� C LL N N LA ce C:)1 rn @ U U v a s .. b N a � o C)M� a� �IMFo B Lr, l� o (3) _ = "Z�� �m2:VV Cm0M Lr) Ln LU Ln N 01 01 t T v ru Ln a LL V) H n 01 N O N a t LM N Lf1 In L Q -2 2 Z 2 Z a LL O �_ N O 0 2 U U U w N C N O Lr) N w (D "r O 11' N IO V Ln O u a 00 M M n 0 Ln n N a'ZO o o V) X C O C LL N N LA ce C:)1 rn @ U U Section View ? Wire mesh reinforcement. I Propex "Sill Stop" Fabric or equal geotextile Note: Attach fabric to i fabric - overlap fabric 6" and fasten at 2' wire mesh and support intervals to post. posts with rings or wire -' ties. Fabric anchorage trench - backfill trench with tamped soil. DUe�°n °t Runoff Pi Tamped soil. Undisturbed subgrade. Note: Support post anchorage with 2" x 2" wood or steel fence posts - 5' minimum undisturbed soil. length and 4' on center maximum spacing. 1 Silt Fence Detail V rj NOT TO SCALE i ra (%) W C tP varies 8' Groundcover varies - see planting plan. O 1 f% cross -Slope Minimum :::•>::•:::•;::::::a;: ' e rTopsoil -see specifications for depth 4" ` and composition. Compacted subgrade. 34" crushed limestone aggregate base - Section View compacted to a 4" depth. Bituminous asphalt paving - 21 Z' wearing course (finished depth). 2 Typical Bituminous Paving Detail 5 NOT TO SCALE Plan View \ \ Limits of \ `\ \ \\ ` \ \ min. Disturbance \ \ \ \ - fz min. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ...'�v[CB4r.'.'r.'.'.'.'rr.'.'. \ \ .......... \ \ Sand \ \ \ Bunker 'N IN�7 \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \ E. \ \\ \ \ \\ \ E w `\ � �\ \ Fai ay Sand `\ \\ ` \'\ Bunkers \\\ \\ `\ `\ \\ \\ \\ W z \ U o - -- Green Sod - See Rough Seed Mix with ( l specifications for species. 'Futerra' Erosion Blanket. v � >" (n a Fairway Sod -See � Rough Seed Mix with ',� specifications for species. ` Straw Mulch. 3 Typical Grassing Detail 5 NOT TO SCALE c 3 M o 0 L: -0 Lr) O "—i N oLn�o L Z �0 t0 C Cr r' � Q) Ol o o Ln Ln w L U-) N 0l T L >` u ro OL 11 -1- V) L rn n O N ro N Y Ln N a-' L Ln Ul ru L O V a - Z Q Z¢` N�LL � � � ai V) p L L 0 N O N O 2 U U a O U v— N C N O Ln N � rn O `O IL N Ut Ln rn a 0 M n 0 Lr) N Cr Z I hereby cerhy that this Ian, sp Niratbn CD or re port was © This plan and the concepts represented herein are Z o prepared by me or under y dir superdsion and that the property of Herfort—Norby Golf Course Architects. N 1 am a duly registered and pe ArchxeQ under the C ru O C laws oft tam Minnesota. Use of this plan shall require prior written approval by Herfort—Norby Golf Course Architects. o LL_ no Ln Y OLr) n O signed: _ Cr C d Date: 1� f�Neglstraton R: _.r/I-17 (=j M O 0 N ,-y 7 n m' rr I \ 6=13° 49'26" \\ R=412.46 \ 99.52 IA l rr <' - E) 1 1 -\ I A I /'1 /-\ r\ ^ L_mr\L_ I\IL_L_ I vvVVLI ti �)f\ A I\r\ITI!\NI mil\L/ /'\UVI I IVIV — =13°5015 i\ A I 1 11 n R=412.05 99.51 - -------------------�6 0 I / 27I� � 27 ' I N N o O� n ° STATE HWY. N0. 1101 ROADWAY EASEMENT PER / so� 4 DOC. NO. 122911 L_ T \ � (PER PLAT OF LL � ss 4o so HALLA GREAT P'E_ R 11Y^Y I I' I \'L E PLAINS ADDITION) v /h / J /x \ �O`�� I — n�j 1. �r Lr..: 1 — 1 1 Lin STATE HWY. N0. I 101 ROADWAY I EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 122911 (PER PLAT OF /o tau, HALLA GREAT �. PLAINS ADDITION) I r N89008'00"W 1355.00 I I I n I� r- p11 r -\i %n)nr\r\^ I n Ir- F) I I r-\ i A I n r\ r\ ^ I L _/11 \ L_ I\ I L_ L_ I v v \J \J LJ LJ1r<\ L_ I \IL_L_ 1 vv\_/\/L./.i r)n 1f, A r\r\ITI/\K I J I �IvV 11LJL/I I I\JIv L R, j 41'p . N89044 39 E 1015.45 —� 97 �8 3g 4' 1 1 9 1 3 TR A I f� V J \ I �1 I D 1 Jl i --� 188.81 S89'45'1 8"E NB4020'18"E 468.75 -rC -- n -� w u� 0 O z W F, LO LO ° - 00 �— z� O Iri LO O O O V) v I44WROP■ 100 50 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET NOTES: -A TITLE OPINION WAS NOT FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR NOR WAS A SPECIFIC TITLE SEARCH FOR THE EXISTENCE OR NON-EXISTENCE OF RECORDED OR UNRECORDED EASEMENTS CONDUCTED BY THE SURVEYOR AS PART OF THIS SURVEY. -ZONING A2 AGRICULTURAL -BUILDING SETBACKS STREET 50 FEET SIDE 10 FEET -SITE AREA 2,002,706 sq. ft. 45.97 acres PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: LOTS 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, AND 9, BLOCK 2; LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 3; LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 4; LOTS 1, 2, AND 3, BLOCK 5; OUTLOT A; TOGETHER WITH VACATED COLUMBINE TRAIL, VACATED HIBISCUS TRAIL; VACATED PERIWINKLE TRAIL; AND VACATED HALLA NURSERY DRIVE EAST; ALL IN THE RECORDED PLAT OF HALLA GREAT PLANS ADDITION, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATED THIS 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2003 SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. MINNESOTA LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR LICENSE NO. 24764 REVISIONS BY �r1 U� 0 r V N Lo rn ''^^ Cn M DLo C Loz Q �n V Ce 2Q MW W Q WW I..L Ix Q 11 UU l 0 J L' Co G� ILEI co 11To O ` H oU LL Z CQ G TO 2 0 W rr1n� H Z < Cv 'w/� r ) V, N89008'00"W 1355.00 I I I n I� r- p11 r -\i %n)nr\r\^ I n Ir- F) I I r-\ i A I n r\ r\ ^ I L _/11 \ L_ I\ I L_ L_ I v v \J \J LJ LJ1r<\ L_ I \IL_L_ 1 vv\_/\/L./.i r)n 1f, A r\r\ITI/\K I J I �IvV 11LJL/I I I\JIv L R, j 41'p . N89044 39 E 1015.45 —� 97 �8 3g 4' 1 1 9 1 3 TR A I f� V J \ I �1 I D 1 Jl i --� 188.81 S89'45'1 8"E NB4020'18"E 468.75 -rC -- n -� w u� 0 O z W F, LO LO ° - 00 �— z� O Iri LO O O O V) v I44WROP■ 100 50 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET NOTES: -A TITLE OPINION WAS NOT FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR NOR WAS A SPECIFIC TITLE SEARCH FOR THE EXISTENCE OR NON-EXISTENCE OF RECORDED OR UNRECORDED EASEMENTS CONDUCTED BY THE SURVEYOR AS PART OF THIS SURVEY. -ZONING A2 AGRICULTURAL -BUILDING SETBACKS STREET 50 FEET SIDE 10 FEET -SITE AREA 2,002,706 sq. ft. 45.97 acres PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: LOTS 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, AND 9, BLOCK 2; LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 3; LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 4; LOTS 1, 2, AND 3, BLOCK 5; OUTLOT A; TOGETHER WITH VACATED COLUMBINE TRAIL, VACATED HIBISCUS TRAIL; VACATED PERIWINKLE TRAIL; AND VACATED HALLA NURSERY DRIVE EAST; ALL IN THE RECORDED PLAT OF HALLA GREAT PLANS ADDITION, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATED THIS 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2003 SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. MINNESOTA LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR LICENSE NO. 24764 REVISIONS BY �r1 U� 0 r V N Lo rn ''^^ Cn M DLo C Loz Q �n V Ce 2Q MW W Q WW I..L Ix Q 11 UU l 0 J L' Co G� RS CHECKED GRG DATE 07/18/03 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO. 7810-001 FILE: WA7810-0010WG\BASE 7810-001.DWG SHEET OF SHFFTS co O H oU LL Z CQ G TO 2 0 W rr1n� H Z < Cv 'w/� r ) V, V JJ a Q 2 Z 2 U RS CHECKED GRG DATE 07/18/03 SCALE AS SHOWN JOB NO. 7810-001 FILE: WA7810-0010WG\BASE 7810-001.DWG SHEET OF SHFFTS Buffer Yard Planting Schedule North Buffer Yard along Pioneer Trail West Buffer Yard Overstory Trees Re 'd Prop. American Linden I Tilts americana Green Ash Fraxinuspennsy/vanica Red Oak Quarcus rubra River Birch ItSetula nigra Su ar maple lAcer saccharum 2 x 5.2 =10.4 10 10 Understo Trees Colorado S race icea pungens Scotch Pine Pinus sylvestris FloweringCrabapple Ma/us sp. 4x5.2=20.8 1 21 21 Shrubs Black Cholkeberry IPicea pungens Cardinal Dogwood I Comus sencea Common Purple lilac S nn is vu/ ans I Synngia vulgaris 6 x 5.2 = 31.2 131 31 i ype o: t,-w(iengm)nutr x .4 (atr wxnn) x iw 7b = o.z Adjacent Land Use - Road East Buffer Yard Overstory Trees Re 'd Prop. American Linden I Tilis americana Green Ash ifraxiniLspennstrlvanica Red Oak Quercus rubra River Birch petula nigra Sugar Male JAcer saccharum 2x3.63=7.26 7 7 Unde cry Trees Colorado S race Picea un ns Scotch PinePinus s Ivestns Flowering Crabs le Imalus s . 4x3.63=14.52 1 15 15 Shrubs Black Chokelberry IPicea pungens Cardinal Do wood I Cornus sencea Common Purple Lilac I Synngia vulgaris 6 x 13.8 = 82.8 1 16 x 3.63 = 21.78 1 1 22 22 i ype n: 1,Y1 v(lengtn)n wx .4 (3v wi(Jtn) x (o')b = 3. W Adjacent Land Use - Large lot & low density residential South & Southwest Buffer Yard Overstory Trees Re 'd Prop. American Linden I Tilia americana Green Ashraxinus nns Ivanica Red Oak Quercus rubra River Birch lBetula m re Sugar Maa Acer saccharum 2x13.8=27.6 28 40 Understory Trees ColoradoS nx;e Picea s Scotch Pine Pinus s vestns Flowering Crabapple IMalus s . 4 x 13.8 = 55.2 1Total 23 23 Shrubs Black Choke Picea pungens Cardinal D Comus sencea Common Purple Lilac S rin is vul ans 6 x 13.8 = 82.8 1 83% t ype n: 1,6W(lengtn)ntxr x .4 (3v width) X fb % = 13.8 Adjacent Land Use - Large lot & low density residential 'w'ww7 .� „ �c�w.M dHrM-..vq mrcomramnecn rewm.a...m u�we,s W. minw�.o�xn.n+mwei M �-r+.�h UW Lwm MAiYm. Overs toryTrees Re 'd Pro . American Linden Tilia americana Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Oak Quercus rubra River Birch Betula nigra Sugar Maple Acer saccharum 2x5.64=11.28 11 11 Understory Trees Colorado Spruce Picea pungens Scotch Pine Pinus sylvestns Flowering Crabapple IM81US sp. 4 x 5.64 = 22.56 1Total 23 23 Shrubs Black Chokelberry IPicea pungens Cardinal Dogwood I Cornus sencea Common Purple Ulac 1 S ringia vul ans 6 x 5.64 = 33.84 1 34 1 34 I ype e: 1,41trPengtn)n W x .4 (.xr wxnn) x tuu 76 = o.ov Adjacent Land Use - Road Note: Not more than 20% of a single species will be used on I \, J Clubhouse Planting Schedule Code Cmmmon Nem. Ml m Wme Ase ua.. dexv Ow=ay Taos K Mwdosn lltlm Tft.n de 3 -MA mM. ] Oq '81mm1'hamM Fe.huapnnsyMnb'Swrml' 3- MM mm, 4 RO Red Oa 0. rubum 3•MM melts t SM Rad Oek .4s Ssalvwn 3 -MM mtls 2 AW 3e• 1.00 e CV Compal NnWm NCunm Vbvrwmeb'um M 3 m OM MMek peya0[yppepp�iYIWJ• 3P a LP 'WM RMpe w" Speae /pvtice YEb Rhmas' N' 3'00 3 MK 'M.spm' swft mwk', Oa , 3r 4 MW 'Mr .wew. mv*Mks 'Mfwy' 34- TM 3 Rs d. B Irtsals AN Tllps-PYYc Tulp qi. N® 8'00 30 Waw Paeaisa-PK RVUM. ap. M. B'OC M �B Practice lee 914 pn.ndnw cmwp.r.prwmwa nxN... ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ � ■ ■. '�. '—. im. �m..mww m. waMMawnn ra>q carcm,w MM.w. ..awwae...w uw mna q.n an wwr. aw+u.n.menl mum by move ��WCm� ve Is Ar V 4J F - to 16. - D seam View � Mn mMniFmml I,t NIYYbY MRBIIPPF,tr.o4. P'r. wrr„Y w,w..,abe-Yr�Rr y hYYMry,.ea.DbA,wT %Wsa II.IrY.IY,I, .YYrn Y�,rfNY,.YIY.n.Y V7 Silt Fence Detail Ip S Homo } N N C O U Y, r-osY. Metlen VNw mp.b.e.Y --Iowa n4 rp--pW amA Typical Bituminous Paving Detail g Yorm�cuE Plan M" o�rr Y.irrr. yr.r�rgr� n..rwwa ❑rYi..rwr ❑YsyiWri Tmo , Grassing Detail s ase_ R W s g■��� _ o,-,Mn.�RM.tMt.Y.nptl.M.Ltit.b_ �� « ii. onnM alMRORNa,y a.R mMY,nw.n. ap ��yf � GQ�b{ ru«r.rr Vp N1lM OM MY npI.. pWIMb.n 1y,IM. eYWRMYbN1 WlCoum.mM.tl, A9 � Chanhassen, Minnesota HOLE PAR BLUE WHITE RED 1 3 153 137 117 2 3 158 143 123 3 3 122 101 85 4 3 174 160/141 125 5 3 133 120 105 6 4 300 275 255 7 3 145 130 115 8 4 324 304 271 9 3 110 95 60 TOTALS 29 1.619 1.475/1.456 1,270 Tabulation Box q Kflm-Nmby CSNCo�m MN.L6. ,4w SITE PLAN .,�9;aQ a .. n a July 18, 1 8.5p Fa.IwE flaw CMnp.m95 )40Minn.fm18 A- O P (B521 s03 -0A1 �sx� 11.:'ei'l..`.. ., o524-5? rj -- - --��--J-� MA IWO m �. "T 9113 _ s4tl— E.r P< n � i 0nrpn bYEb iwrsw.+wbn.rasww� ' �' \ � I O u.r+wb a,bwnbbywou..�.um. wwb.pn wrbw.Erw.nwswi � 0 SEP -02-2003 08:33 CARVER COUNTY PUBLIC WKS. 9524665223 P.01iO3 • • CARVER COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 11360 Hwy. 212 West, PO Box 300, Cologne, MN 55322-0300 Phone: (952)466-5200 Fax: (952)466-5223 MA I_I 1J /181§AAIl Fax Number 9f?Z- 227- 1170 Contact Person -5har rn e e 41 -Ta f i _ Company Name /f o C170,17 120,5'fe.-7 Sender Description/Comments ccs ,c/so /x Pc. {n A4 e- No. of Pages (Including Cover Sheet): Date Sent: Time Sent: If there are any problems with this transmission, please call: 1; L at ( ,� ) (oG - �y 2 cu(.) immediately. RECEIPT CITY OF 690 CITY CENTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, VI CHANHASSEN PHONE: 952) 937`190017 No. 77018 RECEIVED OF 'a)�7� DATE VCr V 1 1 1 f1CryJV�ICI'1 MAIN94 -' L' M�_--I goi It VCr V 1 1 1 f1CryJV�ICI'1 . ...aFiASSS,�-1 - 0 2 vvUS ', '0 ®I=1371 SEF 1 2 3i ill . (C8013768 0 + P-60,33 786 8 SEP. '' 2003 CITY Of CHANHASSEN CITY OF SMITH C IONSEN 18614 CLEARVE DR MINNETONKA, MN 55345-6078 5MIT614 5534530384 1502 09/15:09 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND SMITE 7R5HAEMIN NURSER'}' DR CHASKA MN 55310-1128 CHIN RETURN TO SENDER =, _. _:�---.s•-�c �-%!�- <� � id:1,:i,L„ih„:iil,,:iii,.,,:,iL1::IL,:t:i,ai:::i,i,:i CITY OF CAANHA33EN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration September 12, 2003 Phone: 952.227.11 00 Fa: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Dear Resident: Engineering Phone: 952 227.1180 Fax: 952,227.1170 This letter is to notify you that the City Council will be reviewing the "Chanhassen Short Course" located at the southeast comer of the intersection of Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Pioneer Trail and Great Plains Boulevard on Monday evening, September 15, at . P Fax: 952.2271110 5:15 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Boulevard. Park a Recreation Should have any lease feel free to call me at 952-227-1134 or Phone: 952.227.1120 you questions, Y 9 P Fax: 952.227.1110 e—mail at saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Sincerely, Phone: 952.227.1400 , Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning A Natural Resources Sharmeen Al-Jaff Phone: 952.227.1130 Senior Planner Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952227.1300 Fax: 952.727.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952227.1125 - 1 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web She www.ci.chanhassennn.us The City of Chanhassen * A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a chaffing downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A geat place to live, work, and play.