The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-37_STONEFIELD% t c. Building Inspections Phone: 952 227.1180 MEMORANDUM Fax: 952.227.1190 TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager CITYOF FROM: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner C>IMNSEN Family Residential, RSF, and a public right-of-way variance to allow a 50 -foot right - d of -way, Stonefaeld. DATE: January 9, 2006 7700 Market Boulevard ACTION REQUIRED Parc A Recreation PO Box 147 SUBJ: Request for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A-2, to Chanhassen, MN 55317 Single Family Residential, RSF; Subdivision review for 30 Lots, Administration 2310 Coulter Boulevard 1 Outlot and public right-of-way with Variances Phone: 952.227.1100 STONEFIELD — Planning Case 05-37 Fax: 952.227.1110 the proposed development. The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to approve the Building Inspections Phone: 952 227.1180 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval to subdivide 17.63 acres into Phone: 952.227.1160 30 Lots and 1 Outlot, rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A-2, to Single Fax: 952.227.1170 Family Residential, RSF, and a public right-of-way variance to allow a 50 -foot right - Finance of -way, Stonefaeld. Phone: 952.227.1140 council before the new ordinance becomes effective (published in the City's Fax: 952.227.1110 ACTION REQUIRED Parc A Recreation final plat assuming the final plat is approved within one year of preliminary plat Phone: 952.227.1120 City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council present. Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952227.1404 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 6, 2005 to review the proposed development. The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to approve the Planning A proposed development. The summary and verbatim minutes are item 2a of the City Natural Resources Phone: 95Z.227.1130 Council packet. p - Fax: 952.227 1110 The second ordinance amendment is a setback change and will be applied at the time the applicant submits a building permit. The plans must meet this requirement. The ordinance amendment deals with a 20 -foot setback from a gas line easement. This setback must be met. The applicant submitted designs for a home with a side -loaded three -car garage. The home will fit on the lot abutting the gas line easement and maintain the proposed 20 -foot setback (see details on pages 4 and 5 of the staff report). OQMMp The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. ORDINANCE AMMENDMENTS AFFECTING THIS SUBDIVISION Public works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1308 The City Council will be reviewing ordinance amendments that will impact this Fax: 952.227.1310 subdivision. The first ordinance deals with requiring lots to maintain a 90 -foot Senior center frontage at the front property line. If the preliminary plat is approved by the city Phone: 952.227.1125 council before the new ordinance becomes effective (published in the City's Fax: 952.227.1110 Official Newspaper), the old ordinance would control subsequent approval of the Web site final plat assuming the final plat is approved within one year of preliminary plat www.6chanhassen.mmus approval. M.S. 462.358 solid. 3c. This criteria applies to subdivisions. The second ordinance amendment is a setback change and will be applied at the time the applicant submits a building permit. The plans must meet this requirement. The ordinance amendment deals with a 20 -foot setback from a gas line easement. This setback must be met. The applicant submitted designs for a home with a side -loaded three -car garage. The home will fit on the lot abutting the gas line easement and maintain the proposed 20 -foot setback (see details on pages 4 and 5 of the staff report). OQMMp The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Mr. Todd Gerhardt Stonefield — Planning Case 05-37 January 9, 2006 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the motion approving the rezoning, and preliminary plat with a variance as specified in the staff report dated December 6, 2005. ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff Report dated March 15, 2005. gAplant2005 planning cases(05-37 stoneField (goers property)\executive summary.doc 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN STAFF REPORT PC DATE: December 6, 2005 CC DATE: January 12, 2005 REVIEW DEADLINE: February 13, 2006 CASE #: 05-37 BY: Al-Jaff PROPOSAL: Request for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A-2, to Single Family Residential, RSF; Subdivision review for 30 Lots, 1 Outlot and public right-of-way with Variances — STONEFIELD LOCATION: 1601 Lyman Boulevard APPLICANT: Plowshares Development, Inc. William and Vicky Goers 1851 Lake Drive West, Suite 550 1601 Lyman Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Contact: Nathan Franzen Contact: William Goers 952-361-0832 952-448-6593 Nathan.franzen@plowsharesdevelopment.com PRESENT ZONING: A-2, Agricultural Estate District 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential -Low Density (Net Density 1.2 - 4.0 units per acre) ACREAGE: 17.63 Acres DENSITY: Gross 1.7 Units/Ac Net 2.08 Units/Ac SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Rezoning of 17.63 acres of property zoned A-2, Rural Residential, to RSF, Residential Single Family and Preliminary Plat to Subdivide 17.63 Acres into 30 single-family lots and I outlot, Stonefield. Staff is recommending approval with conditions. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving a rezoning because the City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A rezoning must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 2 PROPOSAIASUMMARY The applicant is proposing to subdivide 17.63 acres into 30 single-family lots and 1 outlot. The property is zoned A-2, Agricultural Estate District, and the proposal calls for rezoning it to RSF, Residential Single Family. The site is located north of Lyman Boulevard and is bisected by Osprey Lane. Access to the site is proposed via a cul-de-sac off of Osprey Lane. All lots are proposed to be served via the cul- de-sac with the exception of two lots which will be served via Osprey Lane. The average lot size is 20,920 square feet with a resulting gross density of 1.7 units per acre and a net density of 2.08 units per acre. All of the proposed lots meet the minimum area, width, and depth requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff has been working with the applicant for several months. The plans have gone through revisions to improve the overall development (height of retaining walls, depth of lots, size of usable back yards, etc.). Staff was invited by the developer to visit a development in the City of Eden Prairie that had a similar topography to the subject site. One of the main concerns staff had was the livability of the backyards of these lots. As can be seen on the photo to the right, the developer provided a flat area (approximately 10 feet wide) followed by a retaining wall and a steep grade. The development in Chanhassen will have a minimum of 20 feet of flat back yard area which will allow for a larger usable area. Staff also noticed that all the homes had a three car garage. This was a concern that staff shared with the applicant. The applicant submitted some floor plans for potential houses on the lots in this subdiaision that � i Il fit on with no variances. the lots Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 3 Williams Pipeline runs through this development. This is a high pressure pipe line. It is located within a 50 -foot wide easement; however, the pipe is not centered within the easement. The buildable area on Lot 3, Block 4 is located 35 feet from the pipeline, while Lot 4, Block 4 is located 15 feet from the pipeline. Staff requested the applicant increase the side yard setback on Lot 4, Block 4, and provide a larger separation between the pipeline and any future home. The applicant increased the easement along the side property line to allow for a 25 -foot setback from the actual pipeline. Staff contacted the pipeline company regarding this issue and was informed that the additional setback was encouraged. Also, staff advised the applicant to hold a neighborhood meeting to inform any interested neighbors of the proposed development. The applicant held the meeting on November 8, 2005. There is one outlot proposed on the site. This outlot will contain the pipe line, storm pond and a trail. The site consists of two parcels owned by the same person. The developer is replatting the most northerly parcel and a portion of the southerly parcel. These two parcels are being assembled into one tract of land, and then subdivided. A wetland occupies the easterly portion of the site. The site has some mature trees. The proposed development is well designed and consistent with ordinance requirements. Staff is recommending approval with conditions outlined in the staff report. The applicant is proposing to rezone the property from A-2, Agricultural Estate District, to RSF, Residential Single Family. The areas to the north and east are zoned Planned Unit Development - Residential. The area to the south and west is zoned Agricultural Estate District. All the surrounding property is guided Residential Low Density. The 2020 Land Use Plan shows this area designated for development as Low Density Residential, 1.2 - 4.0 units per acre. Appropriate zoning for this land use is RSF, R4 or PUD -R. The applicant's proposal has a gross density of 1.7 units per acre and 2.08 units per acre net after the streets and wetlands are taken out. This area is in the WSA. Staff is recommending that this area be rezoned to RSF and finds that the rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. PRELIMINARY PLAT The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 17.63 -acre site into 30 single-family lots. The density of the proposed subdivision is 1.7 units per acre gross and 2.08 units per acre net after removing the roads and wetlands. All the lots exceed the minimum 15,000 square feet of area, with an average lot size of 20,920 square feet. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 4 All of the proposed lots meet the minimum width and depth requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. There is one outlot proposed on the site. This outlot will contain a sidewalk, storm pond and an existing pipe line. Lots 5 through 10, Block 3, abut a wetland. The ordinance requires all structures to maintain a 40 - foot setback from the outside edge of a wetland buffer strip. The ordinance also requires a buffer zone in addition to the wetland setback. A wetland buffer 16.5 feet in width must be maintained around the wetland. ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS AFFECTING THIS SUBDIVISION The Planning Commission and City Council will be reviewing ordinance amendments that will impact this subdivision. The first ordinance deals with requiring lots to maintain a 90 - foot frontage at the front property line. If the preliminary plat is approved by the city council before the new ordinance becomes effective (published in the City's Official Newspaper), the old ordinance would control subsequent approval of the final plat, assuming the final plat is approved within one year of preliminary plat approval. M.S. 462.358 subd. 3c. This criteria applies to subdivisions. The second ordinance amendment is a setback change and is applied at the time the applicant submits a building permit. The plans must meet this requirement. The ordinance amendment deals with a 20 -foot setback from a gas line easement. This setback must be met. The applicant submitted designs for a home with a side -loaded three - car ara a The 21g j \\\\15, 123 sfD�t� oq Of YOo of ;> g% \ �'pn1geg9.73'�� 29 b. I l 14 71,ZOSj 213.769 L-- '\� I I n \L 1 -Lp0 ea nil ` aasz --- 507042'10 144.75 Block 4 g F, . home will fit on the lot abutting the gas line easement and maintain the proposed 20 -foot setback. Lots 1 and 2, Block 4 have been revised to provide additional width and area to Lot 3. The buildable pad area with the 20 -foot setback on Lot 3 will be 71.6 feet at the front setback and 49.4 feet at the rear of the 60 -foot deep pad. We believe this is an adequate building area. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 5 The lot line between Lots 3 and 4, Block 2 has been revised to be radial with the front right- of-way in order to increase the width of the buildable area at the front setback. The proposed buildable pad has been increased in depth to 90 feet in order to have a side - loaded home constructed on this lot. A sketch of a lot fit including the driveway has been attached. The impervious percentage for the attached lot fit is 22% with a deck included (which would permit a patio). The storm sewer between Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 is proposed to be removed and replaced on the lot line in order to increase the buildable pad area of Lot 2. The existing storm sewer easement would be vacated with final plat and a 20 -foot easement would be proposed En \ o \ \ Lot 4, V 00 Block 2 i w 1 4. -- — — centered between the lots. The buildable pad width of Lot 2 would increase to 60.9 from 50.6 feet at the front setback and 68.0 from 57.8 feet at the rear of the pad. Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. WETLANDS Six aglurban wetlands exist on-site. Westwood Professional Services, Inc. delineated the wetlands in August 2005. Wetland A is a 1,182 square foot Type 1 wetland located along the northeast side of the property. The wetland is dominated by reed canary grass. Because this wetland is incidental, all impacts are exempt. Wetland B is a 6,530 square foot Type 3 wetland located in the north central portion of the property. The wetland is dominated by reed canary grass, smartweed, box elder and sandbar willow. This basin was constructed with the Shenandoah Ridge subdivision to the west as a temporary storm water pond. Because this wetland is incidental, all impacts are exempt. 1 � Block 1 1 t t s^ t ;N t t / 1� 6 � r V 0 Wetland B is a 6,530 square foot Type 3 wetland located in the north central portion of the property. The wetland is dominated by reed canary grass, smartweed, box elder and sandbar willow. This basin was constructed with the Shenandoah Ridge subdivision to the west as a temporary storm water pond. Because this wetland is incidental, all impacts are exempt. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 6 Wetland C is a 40,915 square foot Type 6 wetland located in the central portion of the property. The wetland is dominated by spotted touch-me-not and sandbar willow. Because this wetland is incidental, all impacts are exempt. Wetland D is a 1,098 square foot wetland located in the southeast corner of the property. The wetland is a riverine basin with limited vegetation. The applicant is proposing no impact to this basin. Wetland E is a 9,995 square foot Type 2 wetland located along the eastern border of the property. The wetland is dominated by reed canary grass and river bulrush. Because this wetland is incidental, all impacts are exempt. Wetland F is a 901 square foot Type 1 wetland located in the northeast portion of the property. The wetland is dominated by reed canary grass and black willow. Because this wetland is incidental, all impacts are exempt. On September 23, 2005, City staff conducted an on-site review of the wetland delineation with the delineator. The wetland boundary shown on the plans is consistent with staff findings and staff agrees with the delineator's suggestion that Wetlands A, B, C, E and F are incidental and therefore exempt. On October 12, 2005, staff issued an incidental wetland exemption for Wetlands A, B, C, E and F. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) must be maintained around Wetland D. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures must maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. GRADING. DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL The site area is about 17.60 acres and has tree cover over approximately 4.69 acres (27%) of the parcel with a variety of grade changes. The site elevations range from a high of 970± to a low of 912±. These severe elevation differences make it challenging to both develop and minimize grading on this site. The plans propose to grade about 80% of the site for 30 new house pads, a proposed street and enlarging an existing stormwater pond. The proposed grading will prepare the site for full basement and walk -out type house pads. Retaining walls are proposed throughout the site due to the severe elevation differences and to create the house pads. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. Retaining walls within drainage and utility easements must be minimized; however, staff understands that this may not be feasible; therefore, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. Storm Water Management There is an existing regional pond in the northeast portion of this site. The regional pond (BC - P4. 10) presently receives storm water from the Lake Susan Hills development. Recent Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 7 calculations by the City have indicated that the subwatershed for the pond is larger than anticipated. The temporary pond in the northern portion of the site was constructed with the Shenandoah Ridge development to the west. This pond will be eliminated in order to provide access to the Stonefield site from the north. The storm water from this subwatershed must be accommodated in the regional pond. In addition, the streets and many of the backyards in the proposed development drain to this regional pond. The pond must be enlarged, or additional ponding must be constructed, to accommodate the pond's existing subwatershed, the storm water from the temporary pond and the proposed development. Outlot A contains a high-pressure pipeline that will limit the expansion of the existing pond and may force the construction of an additional pond downstream. The existing site drainage is encompassed within almost one drainage area. Under existing conditions, the site drains from the north and west sides to the east to an existing wetland along the southeast side of the property line. Under developed conditions, the applicant is proposing to capture all of the street drainage, all of the front yard drainage, and some rear yard drainage from the interior lots. This stormwater will be conveyed via storm sewer to an existing pond in the northeast corner of the site for treatment. The existing stormwater pond was designed to treat much of the site drainage areas adjacent to the parcel from the north and northeast sides. Since the applicant is proposing to enlarge the existing stormwater pond to accommodate the additional drainage generated from the proposed site, the enlargement must be designed to City standards and coordinated and approved by the City's Water Resources Coordinator. Drainage calculations for the site have been submitted and some changes must be made. The applicant is required to meet the existing site peak runoff rates for 10 -year and 100 -year, 24-hour storm events. Storm sewer sizing calculations with drainage map must be submitted at the time of final plat application. The storm sewer must be sized for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. In order to ensure that all necessary subwatersheds are accommodated by the regional pond expansion and/or downstream ponding, the City has hired a consultant to design the storm water retention and treatment facilities in this area. The applicant must work with the City's consultant to accommodate regional and site-specific storm water needs. Additional land in the rear yards of proposed Lots 1-8, Block 3 may be required for storm water infrastructure. There is existing draintile that flows north to south along the eastern property line. The approximate location and extent of tile should be shown on the plans. The applicant should provide details as to whether the file line will be removed, abandoned in place or remain. If the tile is to remain, the flow from the tile should be accommodated in the design of the storm water management plan. Wetland D is the beginning of a ravine -type system that flows south-southwest through the Goers property (1601 Lyman Boulevard). The ravine has very steep slopes and is highly unstable. The applicant must provide rate control and storm water treatment to reduce off-site impacts. To provide a low -gradient means for controlling rate and volume, the applicant should consider cooperating with the City to construct a wetland in the rear portions of any number of Lots 1-8, Block 3. In the event that the applicant is interested in pursuing wetland construction for banking purposes, this planning should be integrated with the City's consultant's storm water infrastructure planning. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 8 Erosion and Sediment Control Due to steep grades, especially in the southern portion of the site, and historic problems with erosion on this property and properties downstream, erosion and sediment control are of great importance on this site. The proposed retaining walls are of concern to staff due to their height and the potential for downslope erosion and drainage issues. In order to reduce the height of the walls and blend the site into adjacent development, staff recommends platting Lots 8-12, Block 3 and Lots 11-12, Block 4 as one outlot to be subdivided in the future when the parcel to the west develops. At a minimum, Lots 8-12, Block 3 should be custom graded to minimize exposed soils and maximize tree preservation. The existing outlet structure of Pond A is failing. The structure should be removed and replaced in accordance with the City's standard detail. The use of the shredded wood should be considered. The shredded wood could be used as immediate temporary cover after the trees are removed and prior to grading. They could be used as a temporary site exit pad if installed at 100 feet long and minimum of 8 inches thick. The portion of the silt fence that runs from the pipeline easement through Lot 7, Block 3 should be moved upslope to the west by 30 to 60 feet to more clearly define the grading limits. The area of property between the silt fence and the gully and property line should be seeded and mulched to control weeds and get a desirable cover crop in areas that were recently farmed. A temporary basin is necessary in the vicinity of Lots 6 and 7, Block 3. The temporary sediment basin must be installed prior to disturbing upslope area. A temporary perforated riser and stable emergency overflow (EOF) for the basin is needed; details must be included in the plan. The basin should be properly sized for the watershed area, according to NPDES requirements (i.e. The basins must provide storage below the outlet pipe for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2 year, 24 hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shall the basin provide less than 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe from each acre drained to the basin). There are small swales visible in the wooded area that illustrated the erosive concerns of this area especially when it is cleared. If possible, a diversion should be constructed to get the water to the temporary basin in Lot 7, Block 3. A small sediment trap and rock weeper should be considered as an altemative/additional perimeter control in the wooded area should the type 2 silt fence not be enough to protect the stream/waterway. Chanhassen type 2 silt fence is needed for the perimeter of the site up to Lot 10, Block 3. From there, type I would be acceptable. Silt fence should be shown on the plans around Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. Curbside inlet controls are needed; Wimco type or ESS type (or approved similar protection) inlet controls must be used. Curbside inlet protection is needed for existing inlets adjacent to the site exit on Osprey Lane. Adjustment of the proposed rear yard catch basin protection is needed. Wimco type, ESS type or equal must be used. The proposed silt fence is not adequate without additional rock around Chanhassen type 1 silt fence. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 9 The plans should be revised to show energy dissipation for the flared end section on Lot 7, Block 3. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. The applicant should be aware that any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. Surface Water Management Fees Water Quality Fees Because of the impervious surface associated with this development, the water quality fees for this proposed development are based on single-family residential development rates of $1,028/acre. Based on the proposed developed area of approximately 17.21 acres, the water quality fees associated with this project are $18,811. Water Quantity Fees The SWMP has established a connection charge for the different land uses based on an average citywide rate for the installation of water quantity systems. This cost includes land acquisition, proposed SWMP culverts, open channels, and storm water ponding areas for runoff storage. Single- family residential developments have a connection charge of $2,545 per developable acre. This results in a water quantity fee of approximately $46,553 for the proposed development. SWMP Credits This project proposes the expansion of one NURP pond. The applicant will be credited for 50% of the water quality connection charge where NURP basins are provided to treat runoff from the site. This will be determined upon review of the ponding and storm sewer calculations. Credits may also be applied to the applicant's SWMP fees for the provision of outlet structures. The Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 10 applicant will not be assessed for areas that are dedicated outlots. No credit will be given for temporary pond areas. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $65,364. Easements Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) should be provided over all existing wetlands, storm water infrastructure and storm water ponds. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood level. UTILITIES Municipal water service is available to the site from Osprey Lane and sewer is available at the Bluebill Trail and Osprey Lane intersection. The water and sewer mains will be extended south from Osprey Lane to serve the site and stubbed at the southwest corner of the parcel for future extension to the west. Due to the topography of the site and the elevation of the existing sanitary sewer, the site cannot be served by a gravity sanitary sewer system; therefore, a lift station is proposed between Lot 4, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 3. The lift station is not identified on the Trunk Sanitary Sewer System map, or in the capital improvement plan; therefore, the developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and installation of the lift station and forcemain. The lift station and forcemain must meet the City's minimum requirements. The developer is responsible for any additional work required to install the lift station and forcemain including, but not limited to, dewatering costs, grading, subgrade correction and signal tests. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,955.00 per unit for watermain, and the SAC fee is $1,525.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Upon completion and final acceptance of the utility improvements, the City will own and maintain these utilities. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. The developer must obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health and Carver County. Once the executed development contract, securities, fees and permits have been Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 11 submitted, a preconstruction meeting must be held before grading and/or utility construction can begin. STREETS The plans show Osprey Lane within two right-of-way widths, 50 -feet and 60 -feet. The plans propose one full access to the site off of Osprey Lane from the north. The proposed public street complies with the minimum required right-of-way and pavement width. A temporary 90 -foot diameter cul-de-sac turnaround for emergency vehicles is proposed at the southwest end of the proposed street and a "dead-end road" sign will be required. PARK DEDICATION PARKS The property is situated directly west of and shares a common border with Power Hill park. This neighborhood park was developed in approximately 1990 and features a large sliding hill, basketball court, playground, small park shelter and limited off-street parking. A significant elevation change exists between the top of Power Hill Park and the location proposed for the new homes in Stonefield. This will be a deterrent for some residents of the new subdivision as they attempt to visit the park. No additional parkland acquisition or dedication is recommended as a condition of this subdivision request. TRAILS Many neighborhoods adjoining Power Hill Park gain access to the park from neighborhood trail connectors. The applicant has included such a connector in their submittal. The proposed location for the trail connector, within Outlot A, is acceptable to staff. TREE PRESERVATION/LANDSCAPING Tree canopy calculations have been submitted for the Stonefield development. They are as follows: Total upland area (excluding wetlands) 17.60 ac. Baseline canopy coverage 27% or 4.69 ac. Minimum canopy coverage allowed 30% or 5.28 ac. Proposed tree preservation 7% or 1.25 ac. The applicant does not meet minimum canopy coverage allowed; therefore, the difference between the baseline and proposed tree preservation is multiplied by 1.2 to calculate the required replacement plantings. Difference in canopy coverage (4.69-im) 149,846 SF or 3.44 ac. Multiplier 1.2 Total replacement 179,815 SF Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 12 Total number of trees to be planted 165 trees The applicant also needs to make up the difference between the existing canopy coverage (4.69 ac) and the required canopy coverage (5.28 ac). Difference in canopy coverage 25,700 SF or .59 ac Number of trees to be planted 24 Total number of trees required 189 The applicant has proposed a total of 189 trees - 77 overstory trees, 32 ornamentals and 80 evergreens in their landscape plan. No bufferyards are required. The land uses of neighboring properties are similar. The applicant exceeds the recommended 105' of tree removal for wooded lots. Even with the use of extensive retaining walls, the amount of tree removal in the wooded area of the property exceeds minimum ordinance requirements. However, it is less than what could potentially be removed without the use of retaining walls. Staff recommends that alternatives to the proposed plan be thoroughly researched by the applicant. Possible solutions would include larger lots on the southern end, different home styles that are more sensitive to the topography and custom graded lots. COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE - RSF DISTRICT Setbacks: front, side, Wetland Frontage (ft) Depth rear, wetland buffer Buffer (sq. setback (ft) Code 15,000 90 125 30, 10, 30, 40 16.5 Block 1 Lot 1 16,324 91.44 220.28 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 2 15,264 90.00 178.81 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Block 2 Lot 1 (Corner 15,200 92.37, 127.07 136.08 30/30, 10/10, N/A, N/A N/A Lot) Lot 2 15,123 99.01 153.03 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 3 17,128 91.36 192.17 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 4 21,167 75.61 @ Front Lot Line 177.98 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 93.83 @ Setback Line Block 3 Lot 1 35,876 88.26 @ Front Lot Line 307.47 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 95.26 @ Setback Line Lot 2 25,931 90.00 290.72 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 3 23,568 98.15 293.11 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 4 23,995 90.79 296.75 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 13 @ Meets 90 foot width at the building setback line. na — Not Applicable Area Depth Setbacks: front, side, Wetland Frontage (ft) rear, wetland buffer Buffer (sq setback (ft) Code 15,000 90 125 30, 10, 30, 40 16.5 Lot 5 26,253 90.00 291.70 30, 10, 30, 40 16.5 Lot 6 25,506 90.00 283.40 30, 10, N/A, 40 16.5 Lot 7 25,700 89.01 @ Front Lot Line 275.10 30, 10, N/A, 40 16.5 90 @ Setback Line Lot 8 25,348 78.51 @ Front Lot Line 223.39 30, 10, N/A, 40 16.5 90 @ Setback Line Lot 9 21,983 78.51 @ Front Lot Line 211.41 30, 10, 30, 40 16.5 90 @ Setback Line Lot 10 34,207 78.51 @ Front Lot Line 24200 30, 10, 30, 40 16.5 90 @ Setback Line Lot 11 23,343 78.51 @ Front Lot Line 213.95 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 90 @ Setback Line Lot 12 17,596 86.61 @ Front Lot Line 189.81 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 94.29 @ Setback Line Block 4 Lot 1 „ (Corner 96.2 4 90 30/30, 10/10, N/A, N/A N/A Lot) 15,104 127.88 Lot 2 616 94 U 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 15 92,09 17' Lot 3 �5 14:7 69 3 43 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 2 13 21 Lot 4 23,769 130.07 223.37 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 5 18,727 90.00 208.08 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 6 18,180 86.25 @ Front Lot Line 187.04 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 90.12 @ Setback Line Lot 7 16,924 85.9 @ Front Lot Line 174.45 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 90.13 @ Setback Line Lot 8 16,450 87.93 @ Front Lot Line 175.54 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 90.10 @ Setback Line Lot 9 16,498 90.00 183.31 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 10 17,245 90.00 191.61 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 11 17,754 98.14 198.57 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 12 20,608 223.85 198.57 30, 10/10, N/A, N/A N/A Outlot A 42,831 Right -of- 97,138 way TOTAL 627,606 @ Meets 90 foot width at the building setback line. na — Not Applicable Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 14 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; Finding: The subdivision meets all the requirements of the RSF, Residential Single Family District. 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the subdivision ordinance. 3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; Finding: The proposed subdivision is served by adequate urban infrastructure. 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Finding: The proposed subdivision will cause some environmental damage. However, the proposed subdivision contains adequate open areas to accommodate house pads. 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. The one area of concern to staff is the lots abutting the gas pipeline. The applicant is providing an additional 10 foot side yard setback on Lot 4, Block 4 (the lot with the closest house pad to the pipeline) to increase the setback from the actual pipeline. Staff is recommending the applicant get a permit from Williams Pipeline prior to construction. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: a. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. b. Lack of adequate roads. C. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 15 d. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision will have access to public utilities and streets. Sec. 18-22. Variances. The City Council may grant a variance from the regulations contained in this chapter as part of the plat approval process following a finding that all of the following conditions exist: The hardship is not a mere inconvenience 2. The hardship is caused by the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions of the land; 3. The condition or conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally applicable to other property; 4. The granting of a variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of this chapter, the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. Finding: The applicant is requesting a right-of-way variance. The ordinance requires a 60 -foot right-of-way width. The westerly portion of Osprey Lane is 60 feet while the easterly portion is 50 feet. This variance will allow the proposed road to meet existing right-of-way conditions. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the following motions: "The Plamiing Geffffriissi City Council feeeffffnefids appfeval approves Planning Case #05-37 for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A-2, to Single Family Residential, for the Stonefield Subdivision, as shown on plan stamped `Received November 18, 2005'." PRELIMINARY PLAT "The Plawiifig GewAaiss City Council feeewAnends approval e approves the preliminary plat for Subdivision Case #05-37 for Stonefield for 30 lots and 1 outlot with a right-of-way width variance, as shown on the plans stamped `Received November 18, 2005' and as revised in the staff report, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will be required to meet the existing site runoff rates for 10 -year and 100 -year, 24-hour storm events. The proposed enlargement of the existing stormwater pond must be designed to meet the City's minimum standards and coordinated and approved by the City Water Resources Coordinator. 2. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations and a full-size drainage map must be submitted with the final plat for staff Stonef field Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 16 review and approval. 3. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood level. 4. Staff recommends that Type II silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, be used adjacent to the existing wetland, existing creek area, and around the proposed pond. In addition, tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. Erosion control blankets are recommended for all of the steep 3:1 slopes with an elevation change of eight feet or more. 5. All plans must be signed by a registered Civil Engineer in the State of Minnesota. 6. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health, Carver County and the Williams Pipe Line Company. 7. The developer must obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. 8. On the utility plan: a. Show all the proposed storm sewer pipe type, size and class. b. Show the sanitary sewer pipe slope and class. c. Show watermain pipe class (C900). d. Add a storm sewer schedule. e. Show the existing storm sewer between Lots 1 & 2, Block I within the center of the 20 - foot utility easement. L Show the stormwater manholes rim and invert elevations. g. Add a note to remove the temporary pond outlet control structure. h. The last street -accessible storm manhole discharging to the stormwater pond must be manhole with sump. i. Add a note: any connection to an existing structure must be core drilled. j. Extend the storm sewer farther to the south along the proposed street. k. Remove Lots 7 and 8 backyard storm sewer and add a storm sewer along the property line between Lots 4 and 5 and between Lots 8 and 9 block 4. 9. On the grading plan: a. Show Type II silt fence adjacent to wetland, pond, creeks, etc. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Use class 5 storm sewer in the roadway; revise the note under general grading and drainage notes accordingly. d. Extend the swale between Lots 1 and 2, Block 4 farther to the east. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 17 10. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. In addition, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. 11. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,955.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,525.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees will be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. 12. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 13. Any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. 14. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. 15. The developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and construction of the lift station and forcemain and any associated costs. 16. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 17. Add a "dead-end road" sign at the cul-de-sac. 18. On the plat, show all existing and proposed street names. 19. Add City Detail Plate Nos. 1001, 1002, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1009, 2001, 2101, 2109, 2110, 2201, 2204, 3101, 3102, 3104, 3106, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5200, 5203, 5204, 5206, 5214, 5215, 5216, 5217, 5221, 5232, 5234, 5240, 5241, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A and 5313. 20. Show the street lights and a stop sign on the plans. 21. Submit public utility plans and profile for staff review. 22. City Forester's Conditions: a. A minimum of two overstory trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 18 b. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. c. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. d. Tree preservation on site shall be according to tree preservation plans dated 10/14/05. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 23. In the absence of parkland dedication, it is recommended that Stonefield pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final platting. At today's rate, these fees would total $120,000 (30 lots x $4,000). Additionally, the applicant is required to construct the neighborhood asphalt trail connector to the property line as depicted on their preliminary plan submittals. 24. Water Resource Coordinator's Conditions: a. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetland D. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. b. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. c. The applicant shall work with the City's consultant to accommodate regional and site- specific storm water needs. d. The approximate location and extent of drain tile shall be shown on the plans. The applicant shall provide details as to whether the tile line will be removed, abandoned in place or remain. If the tile is to remain, the flow from the tile shall be accommodated in the design of the storm water management plan. e. The applicant shall provide rate control and storm water treatment to reduce off-site impacts. To provide a low -gradient means for controlling rate and volume, the applicant shall consider cooperating with the City to construct a wetland in the rear portions of any number of Lots 1-8, Block 3. In the event that the applicant is interested in pursuing wetland construction for banking purposes, this planning shall be integrated with the City's consultant's storm water infrastructure planning. f. Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) shall be provided over all existing wetlands, storm water infrastructure and storm water ponds. g. The developer asserts that, due to the steep grade in the southern portion of the property, custom grading would not save any additional trees. In addition, the developer maintains that the slope of the road and the location of the retaining wall make custom grading lots Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 19 impractical. If the developer demonstrates to the satisfaction of staff that custom grading for their typical house pad would not result in additional significant tree preservation, mass grading of this area may be approved. h. The existing outlet structure of Pond A shall be removed and replaced in accordance with the City's standard detail. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) shall be provided for the pond. i. The portion of the silt fence that runs from the pipeline easement through Lot 7, Block 3 shall be moved upslope to the west by 30 to 60 feet to more clearly define the grading limits. The area of property between the silt fence and the gully and property line shall be seeded and mulched to control weeds and get a desirable cover crop in areas that were recently farmed. j. A temporary basin shall be constructed in the vicinity of Lots 6 and 7, Block 3. The temporary sediment basin shall be installed prior to disturbing upslope area. A temporary perforated riser and stable emergency overflow (EOF) for the basin shall be installed; details shall be included in the plan. The basin shall be properly sized for the watershed area, according to NPDES requirements (i.e. The basins must provide storage below the outlet pipe for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2 -year, 24-hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shall the basin provide less than 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe from each acre drained to the basin). k. Chanhassen Type 2 silt fence shall be provided for the perimeter of the site up to Lot 10, Block 3. From there, Type 1 may be used. Silt fence shall be shown on the plans around Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. Curbside inlet controls are needed; Wimco type or ESS type (or approved similar protection) inlet controls shall be used. Curbside inlet protection shall be provided for existing inlets adjacent to the site exit on Osprey Lane. City standard inlet protection details 5302 and 5302A shall be included in the plans. The proposed rear yard catch basin protection shall be revised; Wimco type, ESS type or equal must be used. The proposed silt fence shall be installed with additional rock around Chanhassen type 1 silt fence. m. The plans shall be revised to show energy dissipation for the flared end section on Lot 7, Block 3. n. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Tie of SloW Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 20 These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. o. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. p. In order to fund the maintenance and expansion of the BC -P4.10 storm water pond and construction of additional capacity, the costs will be allocated among the benefiting properties. The total cost of materials and construction will be divided by the number of acres in the resulting subwatershed. The City will be responsible for the acres contributing from land already developed, park land and land to be developed in the future (e.g., the Bongard parcel). The developer will be responsible for the acres contributing from their development. If, for any reason, the regional storm water facility is not constructed, the developer will be responsible for providing storm water quality and quantity management on the subject property and paying Surface Water Management connection charges in accordance with City Code. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $65,364. q. In conjunction with the BC -P4.10 storm water ponding project, land in addition to the land shown in Outlot A may be required. At this time, the estimated amount of land is approximately 0.5 acres. The developer and the City will seek to agree upon the terms of the use of land for ponding should additional land be required. The developer, if required, shall provide additional land for ponding. 25. Fire Marshall Conditions: a. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be either removed from site or chipped. b. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. c. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. d. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 21 that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. e. Fire hydrant spacing is acceptable. I. Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 26. Building Official Conditions: a. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. b. Demolition permits must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site. c. The developer must submit a list of proposed street names for review and approval prior to final plat of the property. d. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. e. Separate sewer and water services must be provided each lot. f. Existing wells and on-site sewage treatment systems on the site must be abandoned in accordance with State Law and City Code. 27. The retaining walls shall be maintained by a Homeowners Association. 28. The City shall not be responsible for maintenance of storm water infrastructure on Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block 3. 29. In the event that the regional pond project is not constructed, the applicant has proposed the installation of a second outlet structure on Pond A. In that event, the existing outlet structure that is failing must also be replaced. The cost of a new outlet structure to replace the existing failing structure would be borne by the City, but the replacement would be done by the applicant." ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Affidavit of Mailing and Public Hearing Notice. 4. Potential footprints for houses to be built within the Stonefield Subdivision. 5. Letter from the developer extending the deadline to complete this application to 120 days. 6. Preliminary plat dated "Received November 18, 2005'. 7. Sketch of lot line revision between Lots 3 and 4, Block 2 with house footprint. 8. Sketch showing placement of storm sewer on the lot line between Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Stonefield Subdivision #05-37 On December 6, 2005, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of a Preliminary Plat to Subdivide 17.63 acres into 30 single- family lots and 1 outlot with Variances, Stonefield. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed development which was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The property is currently zoned A-2, Agricultural Estate District. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential — Low Density (1.2 — 4.0 units per net acre). 3. The legal description of the property is attached as Exhibit A. 4. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse effects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) effects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; b) The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the City's comprehensive plan; C) The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d) The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; e) The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; f) The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and g) The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. 2. Lack of adequate roads. 3. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. 5. Variances. The City Council may grant a variance from the regulations contained in this chapter as part of the plat approval process following a finding that all of the following conditions exist: a) The hardship is not a mere inconvenience. b) The hardship is caused by the particular physical surroundings, shape or typographical conditions of the land. c) The conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally applicable to other property. d) The granting of the variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of this chapter, the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. 6. The planning report #05-35 SUB/Planning Case 05-35, dated December 6, 2005, prepared by Sharmeen Al-Jaff, et al, is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat with variances. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 6`s day of December, 2005. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION M Uli Sacchet, Chairman EXHIBIT A That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the following described line and its northerly and southerly extensions; Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 04 minutes 49 seconds West, bearing assumed, along the South line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 790.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 1 degree 57 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of 460.00 feet; thence North 18 degrees 32 minutes 33 seconds East, a distance of 330.00 feet; thence North 52 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 638.57 feet; thence North 1 degree 57 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of 150.59 feet to a point on the North line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter distant 156.07 feet Easterly of the Northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter as measured along said North line and there terminating. M co That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, described as follows, to -wit: The north 375.00 feet lying Westerly of the following described line, to -wit: Beginning at a point in the North line of said Southwest Quarter of Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) distant 849.31 feet West of the Northeast comer thereof, thence Southwesterly deflecting 64 degrees 42 minutes 04 seconds from West to South from said North line, a distance of 163.19 feet; thence Southerly deflecting to the left 32 degrees 35 minutes 37 seconds a distance of 125.62 feet; thence Southwesterly deflecting to the right 22 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds a distance of 302.23 feet; thence Southerly to the northwest comer of the East 290.75 feet of the West 484.2 feet of the South 539.7 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) as measured along the West and East lines of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4); thence South parallel with the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter to the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) and there terminating, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota. Outlot A, Shenandoah Ridge, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota. gAptan\2005 planning cases\05-37 stonefield (goers pmperty)Tiindings of factdoc PLEASE PRINT CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317—(952)227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Planning Case N0.6 A.p�pplicant Name and Address: �✓ lG lr S arcs Iry-/o�7y en i, I Ac-, Owner Name and/Nddres : )r'aJyt ` to' � r 51 I k e t7.,'ve (( rso o f L a Linn a t 11 55 3 17 4 ho rL1 n/ �Wlq Contact: /(/� �%�irt F)'Qr)zcrl Contact: is 0erJ Phone: Email na -' ab .2 Fax: !?52 Oil a A 2ch C& -.�6/-0/3 A/ca✓Sk rr Phone: Y 9-6,5-13 Fax: Email: d«� om Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Interim Use Permit Non -conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development' Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Site Plan Review' Subdivision' i,_ �.. _.. Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Variance Wetland Alteration Permit Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment _,K_ Notification Sign" -$75+$100 Damage Deposit X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost' - $ P/SPR/VAC/VARIWAPIMetes & Bounds -$450MinorS�_ r-, 1 Nlu}. 250 TOTAL FEE $. �;l73J 'Pd LKi If003 An additional tee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be Invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. ' Twenty-six (26) full-size f2lsLed copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8W X 11' reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 ('.tif) format. Applicant to obtain notification sign from City of Chanhassen Public Works at 1591 Park Road and install upon submittal of completed application. $100 damage deposit to be refunded to applicant when sign is returned following City Council approval. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application 1-75 PROJECTNAME: 540r1e-r11&_1d LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec q �fa� f Apr TOTAL ACREAGE:� 7, A 7j 4 - WETLANDS WETLANDS PRESENT: RYES NO PRESENTZONING:I.(hGr / REQUESTED PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: FC pC "r lc A h4 i` REASON FOR REQUEST: PMYIoJi we- (!?a j7leh �— This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and 1 am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owners Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. 1 will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. /b -1Z - ZwS Signature omppllcant Date 16 ) 1SLS1,u _�� 10 - CZ.- ZOD S Signature of Fee Owner Date Gaplan%forms0evelopment Review Applioetion.DOC Rev. 4/05 suA 'ED os -37 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly swom, on oath deposes that she is and was on November 9, 2005, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of POSTPONEMENT of Public Hearing for Stonefield — Planning Case No. 0537 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and swopi to before me this 3:t day of 2005. < AA, Notary Public Z Me �a `' KIM T. MEUWISSEN a i� Notary Public -Minnesota A1Y Commission Expires Jan 31, Zp10 SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING POSTPONEMENT Dear Property Owner: On November 3, 2005, the City of Chanhassen mailed a public hearing notice to you regarding the following proposal: • Request for Rezoning and Subdivision with Variances on property located at 1601 Lyman Boulevard — STONEFIELD. The public hearing has been POSTPONED and WILL NOT be held at the November 15, 2005 Planning Commission meeting as originally scheduled. The public hearing has been tentatively rescheduled for December 6, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. If you have questions regarding this proposal, contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff at 952-227-1134 or by email: saliaff anci.chanhassen.mn.us. CITY OF CHANHASSEN NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING POSTPONEMENT Dear Property Owner: On November 3, 2005, the City of Chanhassen mailed a public hearing notice to you regarding the following proposal: • Request for Rezoning and Subdivision with Variances on property located at 1601 Lyman Boulevard — STONEFIELD. The public hearing has been POSTPONED and WILL NOT be held at the November 15, 2005 Planning Commission meeting as originally scheduled. The public hearing has been tentatively rescheduled for December 6, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. If you have questions regarding this proposal, contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff at 952-227-1134 or by email: saliaff(a)ci.chanhassen.m This map is rather a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as are. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county. state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used fa reference purposes only. The City does not wamant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the Gty does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for nwogational. bedding or any other purpose requiring ea acting measurement of distance or direction or precach in Me depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is protide! pursuant to lfinnesom Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000). and Me user of this map acknowledges that Ne City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend. Indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arse out of the user's access or use at data pmWded. This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in yanws city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes may, The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, traddng or any other purpose r umng exacting measurement of distance or direction or precisim in Me depictim of geographic features. If emas or disaepncies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is pmNded pursuant to fSnnesota Statutes §466.03. Sub!. 21 (2000), and Me user at this map acknoMeciges that the Gty shall not be liable for any damages, antl eapressty waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnity, and hold harmless the Gty from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arse not of the users access or use of data provided. DONNA J BURT DONNA R RICHARDSON DORSEY & DORSEY 1550 BLUEBILL TRL 1551 HERON DR 1551 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8569 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8531 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9403 ROBERT G & JAN E CHATMAS 1552 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8569 WILLIAM T & SHARON E ANDERSON 1561 HERON DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8531 DANIEL J & TONI M GAGNON 1564 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8570 SHAWN & SUSAN MALEK-ZADEGAN 1568 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8570 PAUL L & TONI M COLEMAN 1571 HERON DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8531 TIMOTHY J BLANCHARD & DEBORAH J BLANCHARD 1559 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8571 MICHAEL NOTHOM & LORI BUDIN 1561 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8571 CHARLES E JR & PATRICIA HANSEN TODD R FOSSOM & 1561 LYMAN BLVD ANNETTE M SNYDER-FOSSUM CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9403 1563 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8571 STEVEN C & MARY BETH HARTWIG 1565 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8571 WILLIAM J & ANN M DALHOFF 1569 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8571 MARK J & CARMEN H EDMAN 1572 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8570 STEVEN A & ROSALYN MASTERSON JULIE ANN GRUBER & 1574 BLUEBILL TRL DAVID M LISS CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8570 1576 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8570 SANDRA J KOPF 1578 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8570 WILLIAM J & VICKY L GOERS 1601 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9402 JAMES A & DIANE W BOCK 1581 HERON DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8531 GAYLE O & LOIS J DEGLER TRUSTEES OF TRUSTS 1630 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9402 MICHAEL R & NANCY C BAXTER 1566 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8570 RODNEY W & THERESE C CUMMINGS 1570 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8570 JAMES W TYLER & JOANN BRADY TYLER 1573 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8571 BRIAN A & TEGWIN A ROME 1577 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8571 CHRISTOPHER T ACKERMAN & JERRY M COLBY 1591 HERON DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8531 JAY A & BETH A BENSON 8532 OSPREY LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8562 PHU V TRINH & ROBERT JAMES HARRIMAN THOMAS A & MARY C PEREMSKY LAN M LUONG 8551 ALISA CT 8551 OSPREY LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9371 CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9371 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8564 CHA TERRY D & LINDA C DAHL JOSEPH HALSTEAD & LETITIA LATS LINDSAY & 8552 OSPREY LN LIZA RATHMANNER HOLLY S WARTNICK CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8563 8559 ALISA CT 8560 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9371 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9371 GREGORY J VALENTY & MARCELINE W VALENTY 8562 OSPREY LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8563 FELICIMO P NAVALES JR 8572 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9371 KEVIN J & JENNIFER J GREER 8582 OSPREY LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8563 RAY F & TERESA R VANSTRAATEN 8601 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9373 CHRISTOPHER MATT AMACK & JULIE A INGERSOLL 8633 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9373 ROBERT D & DEBRA L REMKE 8648 FLAMINGO DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8558 JOEL J & KATHLEEN R BODIN 8655 FLAMINGO DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8559 JIM O & CAROL VONGKAYSONE 8664 ALISA LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9377 BRYAN M O'KEEFFE & KIM A CHRISTENSEN 8565 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9371 PATRICK J & KATHERINE THIELEN 8572 OSPREY LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8563 SETH T NELSON & AMYLJOHNSON 8584 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9371 JUAN BERENGUER SR KATHLEEN M KRUPICKA 8616 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9373 MARK L & KARLYN K LANTZ 8642 FLAMINGO DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8558 PAUL A & PEGGY D BONK 8649 ALISA LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9377 PAUL N & SUSAN R HERBY 8660 FLAMINGO DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8558 DAVID G & ANA R PORATH 8665 ALISA LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9377 GARY W & PATRICIA L HARMON 8571 OSPREY LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8564 ANDREW J & TAMMY A HAKANSON 8581 OSPREY LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8564 JON A EVENSON 8600 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9373 JEFFREY M ASHENBRENNER & EMILY ASHENBRENNER 8617 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9373 STEPHEN M & RHONDA K PRIEM 8647 FLAMINGO DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8559 THOMAS R & BETH K NAVARA 8652 FLAMINGO DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8558 JOHN W & SHARON K HARDEL 8663 FLAMINGO DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8559 CRAIG J & JOAN C RENIER 8668 FLAMINGO DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8558 DANIEL C & MELANIE A MERTES THOMAS GARY DREWISKE TIMOTHY M KLEIN & 8671 FLAMINGO DR 8676 FLAMINGO DR STEPHANIE A DAUGHERTY KLEIN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8559 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8558 CHANHASSEN FLAMINGO DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8559 LONNIE L & SHERYL R KOSTER THOMAS M & CARRIE DAVID W & JEAN M HESS 8680 ALISA LN CHRISTENSEN 8682 FLAMINGO DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9377 8681 ALISA LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8558 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9377 MATTHEW E & NANCY S LIPINSKI 8690 FLAMINGO DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8558 J DAVID FEIL 8719 OSPREY LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8565 DANIEL J & CARLEEN M WIERSMA 8750 SUNSET TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9136 CYNTHIA F BONGARD,TRUSTEE & JAMES A BERNARDS,TRUSTEE 8831 AUDUBON RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9407 TUOI VAN TRAN & VEN THI TO 8900 SUNSET TRL CHANHASSEN MN CRAIG M MERTZ PO BOX 216 CHANHASSEN MN KEVIN A & ANNE G ROHE 8696 FLAMINGO DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8558 NATHAN P & TONYA R STIER 8721 OSPREY LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8566 MARK K & TRACY A UNDESTAD 8800 SUNSET TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9137 DANA W & SUSAN M MULLER 8850 SUNSET TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9137 TIMOTHY C BOYCE & TANA I ERICKSON 8941 AUDUBON RD 55317-9100 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8412 JASON J KOENIG & LAURIE ANN MADISON 55317-216 8632 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9373 JEFFREY S & BETH M FLISS 8710 OSPREY LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8568 PATRICK WALSH & MEREDITH E SANDSTROM 8731 AUDUBON RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8411 ROSEANNE M BOYUM 8805 SUNSET TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9404 RONALD W & CAROL M ENTINGER 8851 AUDUBON RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9407 JEFFREY S & LEE ANN FRANZ 8950 SUNSET TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9100 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly swom, on oath deposes that she is and was on November 3, 2005, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Stonetield — Planning Case No. 0537 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Enge�ydt, Dep!Clerk R9 Subscribed and swom to before me this -3r-j day of hi,>to m k4P r , 2005. Notary Pub Nn A KIM T. MEUWISSEN Notary Public -Minnesota My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2010 SCavr-0 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Rezoning and Subdivision with Variances on Proposal: property located at 1601 Lyman Boulevard—STONEFIELD Planning File: 05-37 Applicant: Plowshares Development, LLC Property 1601 Lyman Boulevard Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff at 952-227-1134 Questions & or e-mail saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to Comments: submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online at http://206.10.76.6twoblInk7 the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any Interested party Is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciaUndustnal. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard, Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Plannino Stall person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting n—•— O Tl--. IT,.•....1...• N..ve•..her IC 9nnr. �+7-nn n m This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state ant federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrent that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this mm are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measummunt of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. I errors or discrepancies are found please cordact 952-22]-110]. The preceding disclarner is provided pursuant to Minnesota Stables §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000). and the user of this map atony edges that the City shall not De liable for any damage% and expressly waives all darts, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmoset Me City from any and all china brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which anse out of Met users access or use of data provided This rtap is neither a legally recorded rrap nor a survey ant is not intendetl to be used ss we This map Is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding Me area shorn, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Infooretion System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error Ire%, ant the CM does not represent that the GIS Data can be used lot navigational. tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting mu summent of distance or direction or precision in Me depiction of geographic features. g enors or discrepancies are found please contact 952.227-1101. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this mp acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any barrages, and evressly waives all clams, and agrees to defend, Indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all china brought by User, its employees or agents, of Mind parties which ansa out of the users access or use of data provided DONNA R RICHARDSON CHRISTOPHER T ACKERMAN & DONNA J BURT 1551 HERON OR JERRY M COLBY 1550 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8531 1591 HERON DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8569 CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 48531 ROBERT G & JAN E CHATMAS JAMES A & DIANE W BOCK WILLIAM T & SHARON E ANDERSON 1552 BLUEBILL TRL 1581 HERON DR 1561 HERON DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8569 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8531 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8531 PAUL L & TONI M COLEMAN JAY A & BETH A BENSON PHU V TRINH & 1571 HERON DR 8532 OSPREY LN LAN M LUONG CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8531 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8562 8548 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 -9371 LATS LINDSAY 8 HOLLY THOMAS A & MARY C PEREMSKY TERRY D & LINDA C DAHL HOLLY S WAflTNICK 8551 OSPREY LN 8552 OSPREY LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9371 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8564 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -&563 CHA FELICIMO P NAVALES JR TIMOTHY J BLANCHARD & GREGORY J VALENTY & 8572 ALISA CT DEBORAH J BLANCHARD MARCELINE W VALENTY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9371 1559 BLUEBILL TRL 8562 OSPREY LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8571 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8563 CRAIG M MERTZ BRYAN M O'KEEFFE & MICHAEL NOTHOM & PO BOX 216 KIM A CHRISTENSEN LORI BUDIN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -0216 8565 ALISA CT 1561 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 -9371 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8571 ROBERT JAMES HARRIMAN SETH T NELSON & PATRICK J & KATHERINE THIELEN 8551 ALISA CT AMY L JOHNSON 8572 OSPREY LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9371 8584 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8563 CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 -9371 JOSEPH HALSTEAD & TODD R FOSSOM & LIZA RATHMANNER GARY W & PATRICIA L HARMON ANNETTE M SNYDER-FOSSUM 8559 ALISA CT 8571 OSPREY LN 1563 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9371 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8564 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8571 KEVIN J & JENNIFER J GREER ANDREW J & TAMMY A HAKANSON JON A EVENSON 8582 OSPREY LN 8581 OSPREY LN 8600 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8563 CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-8564 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9373 STEVEN C & MARY BETH HARTWIG DANIEL J & TONI M GAGNON RAY F & TERESA R VANSTRAATEN 1565 BLUEBILL TRL 1564 BLUEBILL TRL 8601 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8571 CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-8570 CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-9373 JEFFREY S & BETH M FLISS BRIAN A & TEGWIN A ROME JAMES W TYLER & 8710 OSPREY LN 1577 BLUEBILL TRL JOANN BRADY TYLER CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8568 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8571 1573 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -8571 JUAN BERENGUER SR WILLIAM J & ANN M DALHOFF MICHAEL R & NANCY C BAXTER KATHLEEN M KRUPICICKA 1569 BLUEBILL TRL 1566 BLUEBILL TRL CHA NHASSEN , MN 55317 -9373 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8571 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8570 HA JEFFREY M ASHENBRENNER & SANDRA J KOPF JASON J KOENIG & EMILY ASHENBRENNER 1578 BLUEBILL TRL LAURIE ANN MADISON 8617 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN , MN 55317-8570 8632 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9373 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9373 SHAWN & SUSAN MALEK-ZADEGAN CHRISTOPHER MATT AMACK & JULIE ANN GRUBER & 1568 BLUEBILL TRL JULIE A INGERSOLL DAVID M LISS CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8570 8633 ALISA CT 1576 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9373 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8570 MARK L & KARLYN K LANTZ WILLIAM J & VICKY L GOERS RODNEY W & THERESE C CUMMINGS 8642 FLAMINGO DR 1601 LYMAN BLVD 1570 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8558 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9402 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8570 STEVEN A & ROSALYN MASTERSON MARK J & CARMEN H EDMAN NATHAN P & TONYA R STIER 1574 BLUEBILL TRL 1572 BLUEBILLTRL 8721 OSPREY LN CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8570 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8570 CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -8566 ROBERT D & DEBRA L REMKE J DAVID FEIL PAUL A & PEGGY D BONK 8648 FLAMINGO DR 8719 OSPREY LN 8649 ALISA LN CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8558 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8565 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9377 THOMAS R & BETH K NAVARA STEPHEN M & RHONDA K PRIEM DAVID G & ANA R PORATH 8652 FLAMINGO DR 8647 FLAMINGO DR 8665 ALISA LN CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8558 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8.559 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9377 JIM 0 & CAROL VONGKAYSONE JOEL J & KATHLEEN R BODIN PAUL N & SUSAN R HERBY 8664 ALISA LN 8655 FLAMINGO DR 8660 FLAMINGO DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9377 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -6559 CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -8558 THOMAS M & CARRIE CHRISTENSEN LONNIE L & SHERYL R KOSTER JOHN W & SHARON K HARDEL 8681 ALISA LN 8680 ALISA LN 8663 FLAMINGO DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9377 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9377 CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -8559 CRAIG J & JOAN C RENIER 8668 FLAMINGO DR CYNTHIA F BONGARD,TRUSTEE & JAMES A BERNARDS,TRUSTEE DANIEL C & MELANIE A MERTES CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -8558 8831 AUDUBON RD 8671 FLAMINGO DR , CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9407 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317-8559 TIMOTHY M KLEIN & , 55317 -8412 STEPHANIE A DAUGHERTY KLEIN THOMAS GARY DREWISKE DAVID W & JEAN M HESS 8679 FLAMINGO DR 8676 FLAMINGO DR 8682 FLAMINGO DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8559 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8558 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8558 MATTHEW E & NANCY S LIPINSKI PATRICK WALSH & KEVIN A & ANNE G ROHE 8690 FLAMINGO DR MEREDITH E SANDSTROM 8696 FLAMINGO DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8558 8731 AUDUBON RD CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8558 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8411 DANIEL J & CARLEEN M WIERSMA ROSEANNE M BOYUM MARK K & TRACY A UNDESTAD 8750 SUNSET TRL 8805 SUNSET TRL 8800 SUNSET TRL CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9136 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9404 CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9137 RONALD W & CAROL M ENTINGER DANA W & SUSAN M MULLER TIMOTHY C BOYCE & 8851 AUDUBON RD 8850 SUNSET TRL TANA 1 ERICKSON CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9407 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9137 8941AU AUDUBON RDCHANH , 55317 -8412 TUOI VAN IRAN & T0 CHARLES E JR & PATRICIA HANSEN JEFFREY S & LEE ANN FRANZ 090 890ET TRL SUNSET 1561 LYMAN BLVD 8950 SUNSET TRL CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9100 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9403 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9100 GAYLE O & LOIS J DEGLER TRUSTEES OF TRUSTS DORSEY & DORSEY 1630 LYMAN BLVD 1551 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9402 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9403 Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) STONEFIELD Rezoning & Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-37 1601 Lyman Boulevard City of Chanhassen ( �0. � � IYY4dM OhOho m N e e c mi 3 0 a � I- 1 TW SUBJECT SITE n 81 m, - Lyman BNEIC R. 181 Ly man BNd (C. .18 Q� ,*,.W 1-aw N! M.W..T. �s M 6I 'XCf I � I' I I I I I ovltM I, I I.I I I I.I r II A I Ill A ___� •}_------- `d L, =J I.I I. I fur rsc 19'JOM _ ,..... - i � I I I II I � I I sur 1 I I._______ __ 1 I 1 U.pyUvnTen — --- I I II f RAW ___ ---- -.—_—r— �:wr..acc' sm8. SUIT' II ', a�a I � 6 -1 ---- # --- �e 1 -VZ- y i a _ --------------------- ��.a. IIv02R II i � Ta• OIN�I'G �� I I �•PP& � I fT T f! IR`1f 11.Q"RfllN w - Orf w�aF�mwi IC ------71 anw'nm I • I I fMvtl fY /' OCG190d 7 I . ` i i I ' I •RY RPI `I I \ m I 2 • MN fO t t I I mmom -41 i t - }------------Me Q I I �„a 1I - m•, T w�aF�mwi leaa•wwiaroneo•o r epT IL QCu Yr�ms F.Y mnL a r.ve 1 1 1 1 II II I M 1 nseeeu w'•oc. 1 1 1 Y N 1 YI Y eeuwroMsvnsa, Mw, I••/Q/Q 1 1 1 1 II q I Y 1 1 1 II II 1 A rsLvwee aeLc J1 M.NA. /IQIO I IlbllWMl , I/Y. I'W-L O MPROOM u3 f b .v a.,• � 9eILGVe w" fLq'1t 1teYf.11. T' OL. 10.14iL�i (ro l 7 r Y y STOOP F0YF.1'ER — � � yNpy Ir•reveo ___ f � _ amore vac Qowa ai,^nc esnart ___ a.asn. w^o w^reae nears. us'aL. c s^ `ac. alm Im•vaeeo�wc. wn.l. ___ M14 Yf'Cm Nit/MNL! Ib nClea ___ qr L rac. rellrrc. R.I. PATH FIX. Pwm/ e e M -- OFFICE aeawsc w'•o<. --- a b r•voueorac ve.. s••ranc. aeo --_ I gala ^.er•rarc. ni le••.e•Ioee.nc. _ I nw+e vaenalaelnnaloe ___ sln••wc. avrLmn 0 ovrel ne saw as o rnn aic•r aI 9Rf 3 i ::: i iii meerENt n_AN 1...a —1, KROISSz y� o wvnrxr, me rte. • �. n+..•+.TrW a r_ • yga�Ya,toc��i Y-� pA�rtnT[ wwT fY MAIN MOOR _ K R O I S S�� 1�Ts7'.'��'C UPPER FLOOR � vvr 0 M - O Mm � V wiii "aa�.a�e frnw I in n. n w. rt. �J( ONO 1I' moi... W .{■�lp LiMI �M UPPER FLOOR � vvr e ]9+E i m � � pEVELVPMFM.INC. ��l��TC�.Y O I � V wiii "aa�.a�e frnw I in n. n w. rt. �J( e ]9+E i m � � pEVELVPMFM.INC. ��l��TC�.Y ROOT KNTS AS ACO'D INSULATON Bhi S; MIN. 1' AIRS -ACE WALL WCTWN �ISOM VAMR SNIELD ALL ARp1ND Yl9JN1I DMRCNI W 'AY RL fUldly OppJ6 EN MIIY' N/11 9D IpRY FIdR WfBICIU 6 M! 09R1MUFi KROISS;�"�� OEVELOPMENi. 11VC. fylw L V O . �. �.�.�.�. IiiR X1.1.1.1.1. us a .1.1.1.1.1.. ;,;,.;:•r AftIM € 7 �evrn.aeRn.,w aurrt g 3 l [ ottE 111 r .qo�w j �y i 4 \ J, 1 +� MNG 1 ME w caw + � 4 I I II I I �evrn.aeRn.,w aurrt g 3 I n2 OEGRLI'JM 1 c _ L y -216 `VW • rS.s p.. ` I Yci I I , I �. J roa�erasnsao v f1:4 !-II ron.� •s.+e November 23, 2005 Sharmeen AI-Jaff City of Chanhassen 6900 City Center Dr. P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Shartneen, PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT, LLC nr- nCCEIIVED NOV 2 8 2005 CI Y0F0ANHASSEN Plowshares Development would like to grant the City of Chanhassen an additional 60 days for the preliminary plat application for Stonefield, with the understanding that the Planning Commission hearing will take place on December 6h, 2005. We would also request that the City Council hearing stay on schedule and by placed on the December 12d' agenda. Regards, Nathan Franzen Plowshares Development 1851 Lake Dave W, Suite 550 Chanhassen, MN 55317 952-361-0832(Office) 952-361-0833 (Fax) 612-270-2020 (Mobile) a -,x v.plowsharesdevelopment.com in the business of buying, selling, and developing land phone 952.361.0832 fax 952.361.0833 1851 Lake Drive West, Suite 550 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 www.plowsharesdevelopmentcom Preliminary Plans for Stonefield Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared for: Plowshares Development, Inc 1851 Lake Drive West Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Contact Nathan Franzen Phone: 952-361-0832 Fa)c 952-361-0833 Prepared by, ".,..'estovootl Rofeisi� ®Savkes, Inc. Project Number: 20051114.00 cmlxc awn... em, n CITY RECEIVED SSEN NOV 1 8 2005 CliANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Vicinity Map u.l 1. u..1 M Pnn ImmwI fine 1 10 A—d Pa GX aomm.nY ptl1 L ] Y 2 11/15/0 ia+..a P. ar cmm.n. w ui NOT POR CONSTRUCTION Preliminary Plans b OUYr. m.. . . .an M qm 0 Dwaofm iM rwr •r w sw.rl p.rw J ««xr•J Ori J W L hw.. rM MT 4 W. Nr.w r.rrt ..w mm� n.l.r.www"arw«r..."awJwrrJ....rn w+.x «Jrr.w..rr rwi"J ". ww (p rp JM rrA «�+�w rte+. +J w r «J r «war ye•.r eSr �r�� w��wJwuh.ar�ir gJ�-1/.I wrr xw a«�+R r L • aJ« �r «r J.�w.rr rwJ wrnu erAX arz M ac cru a'u5� rr=eoo-iv-na c«eplu,,,ssen \ a•Ysxt a /� �� \ \ \ \ \ I I I \\\ \\ r I I I e r , � / .tel • / / • � / 1% • w...m... m a r L • aJ« �r «r J.�w.rr rwJ wrnu erAX arz M ac cru a'u5� rr=eoo-iv-na c«eplu,,,ssen \ a•Ysxt a /� �� \ \ \ \ 1% • w...m... m a —� 1 7 _. ,F...me„m • oms mo a —.r_ .«,.. 4 .at • • 11 w.r "r ... • r r • .�.N m.m. u. e • m B ns saa —rn— " X x r L • aJ« �r «r J.�w.rr rwJ wrnu erAX arz M ac cru a'u5� rr=eoo-iv-na c«eplu,,,ssen \ a•Ysxt a /� �� \ \ \ \ •A.eer•mandeabeSeNmYc I tee_^= Pl°w°hiiim De &Tment I= Stonefield 1% P 1 7 11 \� •-- sw I` •A.eer•mandeabeSeNmYc I tee_^= Pl°w°hiiim De &Tment I= Stonefield II I 4 curtore I, � -------- aeanr i i Onnkpr"d DWA nrAm.� nw� am..r re.�t as ay. e u.r te. n.yrNN t,et wVYit -uttu•w -uo�u -ur -awua.. -MFM! -tt�MW -wrr - aawtn rw w. FF. -srF -wtr lhandLd (NrW s.u.. a+w♦....r .wNOT FOR CONSMUCTION Plowsham Development, Inc n a �m ne wnum .. a sun Stanfield rt •IOJ! MI.mE Inti'au SNa Mc C. 4 Xa.. ✓a. JI}K GWP VAX ONE CNL —____-- I I •1 � otN � i I I I If \ \S%� '\�• � I — I 1 (:i � w / '� Y/{ ^♦ `♦ 1 I 1 I i l A i i I I I I I I 1 \ _ '' \ qt ♦ \ 1 I 1 Ir rl II I; 11 11 f________ 0 N \ `\`♦ N`\ `\�N 1 1 j/ �/ 11 11 11 11 11 I I 1 x+�\ � m 11i \\ j `t-__ ""' Jli, /i i ii II I. li /i �•N9 �>: ♦ I I _ . l♦ \ _ r .S II II r/ is `♦ �W� I Om i \1\/ ♦ ♦\` '� ____Ji I 11 wN iIt-___'J L_ L --"'J /i/ I I III \ �wf ; '�` ` ♦`♦ ' ' L ------J L- :: ♦ I �. \\ ; Y ms`s I ♦> f : r II ]f•__ !a1 — p ♦ \ \ II /I /1 i I� r 11 1; i i ii '� V( � � N` �` i i i ;; i � I� III II 1 1 '; ♦`♦ `` `I _ \ I I I li li I 1 II I; 11 -Jj \� 11 ♦ \ \ I I/ If 1 1 jl i 1 . w`^.N, `♦ � f `\ `b% i l i ri �e __ I L-___- � �• 1 ____ ` I JT _ a LL -• Nam Genal Utility NOttl _ J r—� i r—� i r --I � I I I I . na DeIN.Dlel wu .NNr.L �mle re.wa Nel ro mwwlclm , Np lyl.. M D.Y O MI. MEIDItB . ,1[ OIINID1Yl «N, I®'.{ x I.®.IN IAIr. q. 1LL .aN NM I j I j ^ I n I I .vu wa aoa lttl4.RNM1 NMM1A1O1r DORM � I I r1 I � D.m uxnNw m � DDDUNnm .m rs ne.ver. >�,m ---1---�---L—_J I I I .n<rm axn.aL�t.l.um NM.r aaD n.vms x nimtl0 . J I C]Ir61CY Nuu ry N. on ..-..r eeNne¢Nx N.w m N� w.rNl. ro —.— tDn.11 — - - � J — wuwl .w luau rva — om •YL mN etw wtw�a.a,wm Dnas wm w.p..n..K ,D .n�K --� v.D mew. ntm D. ala• v .roN� N.w — «— nuN — — � 'iw �Nm'nr""urla«"`�t meNlN..uwNN m.6°a°aul ro ra ItF d, n rlic'4°li `N'd.m luluiumm Ipmu� rai r'i.m YNM WD mIM6lY[NnN1ATil YO tWfYM1'YYCt .MD tWW {.pl 0 V �m �N •�nuoum wsurw °/a.�.a'r`r m�mNe1°".ro°rr Iw oor ar vri NOT FOR CON9MUCEION ®rolml a mm mwntlD w aNrolr .oeolDDu. mt aalmnw NwL n `-• „""•", °� ualnm m rwn NL mamlm u wlurm sr INe Ine•L .Dolcr. news ... s e. n v+.eNood RdrswlNSm*eahc eT :'7.'r'� cw�...�tr _ "'—"' Stonefield Protlmt Plowshares Development/ Inc u:ty Prnyi n GOPHQ, STAX OK w.n,wndMAcv:. ssmrces, mc. "Plowshares Development, Inc. Stonefield 7Y. Pr.nc ti. I „� `........`6..Y. I �=` -_-� " I'"`•®•••�"r— I y _ I fl,,, PIPE LINE STREET A ® Nor FOR CONMUCrION Plowshares Development, Inc Stonefield rcwe TYPICAL LOCAL gpwT SSG7'!ON (W HACK TO BAM am ro .un wr. na ww�cr nox..0 wcnM. W Mrn M ran ouereiws M rl r{rwrw E*xMa�O[A NOT PDR CONSPRUCrM "�d PWwsham Dev t Iiu Stonefield au In x... xw. w.xs „t 'iium s u rsi MIM 110 OMW TYPICAL LOCAL gpwT SSG7'!ON (W HACK TO BAM am ro .un wr. na ww�cr nox..0 wcnM. W Mrn M ran ouereiws M rl r{rwrw E*xMa�O[A NOT PDR CONSPRUCrM "�d PWwsham Dev t Iiu Stonefield au In x... xw. w.xs �; OR PLAN OR TLAN pro R� OIO �INB� P4l I�� 'aA�Cp• '1C\I 6P� gf. �i �; OR PLAN OR TLAN 2 \ 15,264 sf \ I 7 6, 324 s f 95,200 sf I I \I. \ \X\ a CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 03/02/2006 12:19:56 PM Receipt No. 0000643 CLERK: danielle PAYEE: Plowshares Development Inc 1851 Lake Drive West Suite 550 Chanhassen MN 55317 Final plat-Stonefield 05-37 ------------------------------------------------------- Use & Variance 250.00 Total Cash Check 5511 Change 250.00 0.00 250.00 0.00 SCANNED 05-31 From:H.T.P.O. INC. 952 829 7806 12/09/2005 11:42 #035 P.002/002 :\ 14 .. \ E 11, pdti o j / \ �` ✓' o i _� :;� Ili 91 If It I it ME Al 41- ; : i (i,,' %� l tlj' t' I A --7 E Engineering • Surveying Landscape Architecture MEMORANDUM To: Lori Haak From Charles J. Howley Re: Stonefield Date: December 5, 2005 Ms. Haak, It is our recommendation that any Iots in the proposed Stonefield residential development that borders the City owned stormwater pond, located in Outlot D of Lake Susan Hills West 4u Addition, have a minimum finished floor elevation of 924.3. This elevation gives 3 -feet of flooding protection from the e)dsting 100 -year high water level (HWL) for the pond. The Stonefield development proposes to expand the aforementioned pond due to the elimination of upstream ponds, and it is further recommended that the proposed HWL not be less than the existing in order to maximize storage volume. Please feel free to call to discuss the matter further if need be. Sincere y, Charles J. Howley, P. . 7510 Market Place Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone; 952.829-0700 Fax:952-829.7806 Data Smce(s): Acnals Expnxs (2002), Met Council, Digital Soil Swvey-C.mer County (2004). Legend — Property Boundary Hydric Soils Approximate Wetland Boundaries Map Document: (P:\20051114\gis120051114soi101A.mxd) 8/17/2005 — 1:02:04 PM Feet 0 200 400 Goers Property wWestwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drtve Chanhassen, Minnesota Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952-937-5150 N A Soils Mapping EXHIBIT 3 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. W 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Phone: 952/937-5150 Fax: 952/937-5822 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 28, 2005 Ref: 20051114 TO: Ms. Lori Haak, City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd, PO Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mr. Joe Yanta, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District 190 5s' Street East, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1638U cue Mr. Greg Graczyk, Carver Soil and Water Conservation District 1 SEp shy t�t1RSSEN 219 East Frontage Road, Waconia, MN 55387 C CC: Mr. Nathan Franzen, Plowshares Development 1851 Lake Drive West, Suite 550, Chanhassen MN 55317 Mr. Chris Moehrl, Westwood Professional Services, Inc. FROM: Ms. Genevieve Bolling, Environmental Scientist J2&/1 !�% RE: Request for Certificate of Exemption from the City of Chanhassen and a Letter of No Jurisdiction from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for the Goers Property located in the NW 1/4 of Section 23, T116N, R23W, City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota We are writing to request a Certificate of Exemption under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act of 1991, as amended (WCA), from the City of Chanhassen and a Letter of No Jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act (Section 404) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). We understand that the City of Chanhassen is the Local Government Unit (LGU) responsible for administering the WCA and that the St. Paul District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers administers Section 404 in this area. Evidence presented in this report shows that Wetlands A, B, C, E, and F are isolated, incidental wetlands that were not created solely for the purpose to create wetland, and thus are exempt from WCA and Corps jurisdiction. Following the narrative, the Certificate of Exemption documents the applicability of this exemption to these areas. Site Location and Wetland Characteristics The Goers Property is located in the NW '/4 of Section 23, TI 16N, R23W, City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota (Exhibit 1). The property is bordered by residential development to the north, undeveloped forested land to the south, and private residences and agricultural fields to the east and west. The site consists of wetland, a wooded ravine, soybean fields, and forested upland. Valley Ridge Trail North intersects the property at the northern end. Memorandum — Request for Wetland Certificate of Exemption and Corps Letter of No Jurisdiction September 28, 2005 Paae 2 The site was assessed for wetlands on August 18, 2005. Historic conditions prior to development were not known at the time of the delineation. As a result, six areas were unassumingly delineated as jurisdictional wetland (Wetlands A -F, Exhibit 4) despite site disturbance and alteration. Site disturbance such as steep side slopes, a buried A horizon, and a young stand of sandbar willows associated with Wetland A, B, C, E, and F are most likely a result of the construction of Valley Ridge Trail North and single-family development. Despite wetland conditions, the land owner (Mr. Bill Goers) states that everything was dry and farmable before the construction of Valley Ridge Trail North and the on-site holding pond, even during the years of high precipitation (September, 2005). Mapping No NWI wetlands are mapped on the property (Exhibit 2). The soil survey of Carver County indicates Hamel loam Kilkenny -Lester loams (2 to 6 percent slopes), Lester -Kilkenny loam s (2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded; 18 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded), and Terril loam (6 to 12 percent slopes) are mapped within the Goers Property (Exhibit 3). Hamel loam is listed as hydric soil (Hydric Soils of Minnesota, revised December, 1995). All other soils are indicative of uplands. Hamel loam corresponds to the majority of Wetlands A, B and C, and E. Wetland F corresponds to Terril loam. Aerial Photography and Wetland Review The following table illustrates the site morphology from 1936 through 2003, as depicted in available aerial photography, summarizing site development and wetland signatures. Precipitation data available from WETS is included to highlight whether the months prior to the date of the aerial photograph are considered dry, wet, or normal. The earliest precipitation data available from WETS is 1979. Year Source Precipi- tatioW General Site Development Wetland Characteristics 1937 HIG N/A Farmsteads, Audobon Road No wetland signatures 1940 HIG N/A Farmsteads, Audobon Road No wetland signatures 1951 HIG N/A Farmsteads, Audobon Road, Lyman Road No wetland signatures 1957 HIG N/A Farmsteads, Audobon Road, Lyman Road No wetland signatures 1%3 HIG N/A Farmsteads, Audobon Road, Lyman Road No wetland signatures 1970 HIG N/A Farmsteads, Audobon Road, Lyman Road No wetland signatures 1979 HIG Normal Farmsteads, Audobon Road, Lyman Road No wetland signatures 1985 FSA Dry Farmsteads, Audobon Road, Lyman Blvd No wetland signatures 1986 FSA Wet Farmsteads, Audobon Road, Lyman Blvd Obstruction of clouds 1987 FSA Dry Farmsteads, Audobon Road, Lyman Blvd No wetland signatures 1988 FSA Normal Farmsteads, Audobon Road, Lyman Blvd No wetland si tures 1989 N/A Dry N/A N/A 1990 N/A Wet N/A N/A 1991 HIG/ FSA Wet Residential development has begun; Off- site Pond constructed HIG/FSA: No wetland signatures 1992 FSA Dry Increased development Drainage from Off-site Pond is apparent, which corresponds to Wetland E 1993 FSA Wet Increased development 1994 FSA Dry Osprey Road constructed 1995 FSA Normal Pond 1(Welland B constructed Disturbance around Pond 1 is R Westwood Professional Services, Inc. (952) 937-5150 Memorandum — Request for Wetland Certificate of Exemption and Corps Letter of No Jurisdiction September 28, 2005 Paae 3 1997 HIG/ Dry Additional development not apparent Wetland C; Wetland FSA signatures correspond to Wetlands B and E 1998 FSA Normal Additional development not apparent 1999 FSA Normal Additional development not apparent 2000 FSA Normal Additional development not apparent 2001 N/A Normal N/A N/A 2002 Aerial Wet Additional development not apparent Wetland signatures Express correspond to Wetlands B, C and E 2003 HIG/ Wet Additional development not apparent Wetland signatures USDA 1 correspond to Wetlands B, C and E 'HIG: Historical Information Gatherers ZFSA: Farm Service Agency slides obtained from the NRCS Carver County Once (Available upon request) Aerial photography in 1937 depicts Audobon Road, farmsteads, and plowed fields. Construction of Lyman Road is depicted in 1951. No wetland signatures corresponding to Wetland A, B, C, E, or F are apparent from 1937 to 1991. Development of the site is first depicted in 1991 aerial photography, including construction of Pond 2. Aerial photography in 1992 depicts drainage from Pond 2 to the Goers Property, which corresponds to Wetland E. Construction of Pond 1 and surrounding disturbance is apparent in 1995 aerial photography, which corresponds to Wetland B and Wetland C. Wetland A Based on aerial photography and the existing soil profile and side slopes, Wetland A was not historically wetland. Although hydric indicators are present in the upper 12 inches, Wetland A's soil profile exhibits a buried A -horizon. Historic aerial photography reviewed does not depict a wetland signature corresponding to Wetland A, thus suggesting that the hydric indicators are recent. Steep slide slopes, most likely absent prior to development, divert drainage to Wetland A. Based on aerial photography and the existing soil profile and side slopes, Wetland A was created from upland. Wetland B Based on aerial photography and existing conditions, Wetland B was not historically wetland. According to the City, Wetland B was created as a holding pond in association with the adjacent residential development. The pond is depicted in the 1995 aerial photography. Prior to 1995, no wetland signature is apparent. Based on aerial photography and existing conditions, Wetland B was created from upland. Wetland C Based on historic aerial photography and existing conditions, Wetland C was not historically wetland. A large culvert pipe allows drainage from the holding pond to the north (Wetland B) to Wetland C. Neither a wetland signature nor the existing stand of willows are depicted in aerial photography prior to 1995. Based on historic aerial photography and existing conditions, Wetland C was created from upland. Wetland E Based on historic aerial photography, Wetland E was not historically wetland. Construction of an off-site holding pond to the northeast is first depicted in 1991 aerial photography. Drainage from the holding pond to the Goers Property is depicted in 1992 aerial photography, which corresponds to Wetland E. No wetland signature was depicted in the location corresponding to Wetland E prior to the construction of the off-site holding pond. Based on historic aerial photography, Wetland E was created from upland. W Westwood Professional Services, Inc. (952) 937-5150 Memorandum — Request for Wetland Certificate of Exemption and Corps Letter of No Jurisdiction September 28, 2005 Paqe 4 Wetland F Based on existing conditions and soil mapping, Wetland F was not historically wetland. Soils are mapped as Terril loam, which is an upland soil. The soil profile exhibits a coarse soil texture and an unpenetratable soil layer at 11 inches. Based on the soil profile, surrounding steep side slopes at the south end, and sloping manicured lawns surrounding the north end, the area has likely been altered by excavation and fill activities. In the delineation report, soils were identified as hydric under the assumption that they are frequently ponded for long duration or very long duration during the growing season, a criteria reflecting soils that are likely to meet the definition of hydric soils (htto://soils.usda.gov/usOydric/criteria.htmi . In the absence of the Valley Ridge Trail North embankment to the south, runoff would have most likely continued to drain south. Based on existing conditions and soil mapping, Wetland F was created from upland. WCA Exemption Certification The Applicant submits that Wetlands A, B, C, E, and F are exempt from regulation under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. The exemption that applies to basins created for purposes other than wetland creation is set forth in Minnesota Rules Part 8420.0122, Subp. 5 (Incidental wetlands), which states: A replacement plan for wetlands is not required for activities in a wetland created solely as a result of: A. beaver dam construction; B. blockage of culverts through roadways maintained by a public or private entity; C. actions by public or private entities that were taken for a purpose other than creating the wetland; or D. any combination of items A to C. Wetlands may be drained, excavated, or filled if the landowner can show that the wetland was created solely by actions, the purpose of which was not to create the wetland. Based on the evidence described in the previous, Wetlands A, B, C, E, and F were created by "actopns by public or private entities that were taken for a purpose other than creating the wetland." Aerial photography does not depict wetland prior to 1991 in the corresponding areas. According to the current land owner, the property has always been dry enough to farm prior to the construction of the holding pond (Wetland B) and Valley Ridge Trail North. Although Wetlands A, B, C, E, and F meet all three jurisdictional wetland criteria, these conditions were not created solely for the purpose of wetland creation. The Applicant submits that Wetlands A, B, C, E, and F were unintentionally created as a result of grading for surrounding residential development, and from receiving stormwater runoff from surrounding development. Corps of Engineers No Jurisdiction Determination Summary The Applicant submits that Wetlands A, B, C, E, and F are not Waters of the U.S. under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. A decision signed by the United States Supreme Court on January 9, 2001 restricted the Corps of Engineers' authority to regulate isolated wetlands under the Federal Clean Water Act. Currently, Wetlands A, B, C, E, and F are not adjacent to or tributaries to navigable waters of the U.S. Although the Hamel loam soil mapping unit that corresponds to Wetlands A, B, C, and E shows contiguity with Lake Susan, a historic surface water connection is unlikely based on the distance and route of hydric W Westwood Professional Services, Inc. (952) 937-5150 Memorandum — Request for Wetland Certificate of Exemption and Corps Letter of No Jurisdiction September 28, 2005 Paae 5 soils between the Goers Property and Lake Susan. The Applicant submits that Wetlands A, B, C, E, and F are not Waters of the U.S., and are non jurisdictional under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. Conclusion This memo and attachments document that Wetlands A, B, C, E, and F were created for purposes other than wetland creation, and are isolated from navigable waters for purposes of Section 404 regulation. These wetlands were not historically wetland, and were incidentally created as a result of soil disturbance and alteration of surrounding landscape. Westwood is requesting a Certificate of Exemption from the City of Chanhassen and a Letter of No Jurisdiction from the U.S. Army Cors of Engineers for Wetlands A. B, C. E and F located within the project area. If you have questions regarding this memo or require additional information, please call me at (952) 906-7488. W Westwood Professional Services, Inc. (952) 937-5150 APPLICANT AND PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION lopment. LLC LGU:City of Chanhassen Xs) of Applicant Project Location: 1/4 1/4NW S23 TI 161123 Lake Drive West, Suite 550 UTM Coordinates: X Y t Address CountyNameJNumber: Carver/10 hassen. MN 55317 Minor Watershed Name/Number:Mmnesota (ShakopeeU33 State, Zip Code Size of entire wetland:N/A acres Wetland type: Circular 39 N/A ; NWIN/A 361-0832 (952)361-0833 Check one: ® < 50%, ❑ 50% - 80%, or ❑ > 80% ,hone (Day) (Evening) Check one: ❑ Agricultural land ®Non-ag. land PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION cribe the nature and purpose ofthe proposed project: The applicant proposes a single family residential development in of Chanhassen. The proposed development may require fill of exempt Wetlands A, B, C, E and F, located at the north of the parcel. (attach additional pages if needed) will The wetland activity at the above site qualifies for the following under the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) (check one): F ►ON No Loss Determination (attach plans) Exemption # 5 (Incidental Wetlands) (per MN Rule Chapter 8420.0122) (Note: Applicant is responsible for submitting the proof necessary to show qualification for the exemption claimed.) Description of Exemption Claimed: Subp. 5. (Incidental wetlands) states that a replacement olan for wetlands is not reouired for activities in wetland areas created solely as a result of actions by public or private entities that were taken for a purpose other than creating the wetland. This exemption applies to Wetlands A. B. C, E. and F, which were created as a result of soil disturbance and artificial drainage from surrounding development and not for the pgWse of creating wetland. Page] of 3 Goers_exempt_fonn.dm (A012003) APPLICANT SIGNATURE The information provided for this determination is truthful and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I ensure that, in draining, excavating, or filling the subject wetland under an exemption noted above; appropriate erosion control measures will be taken to prevent sedimentation of the water; the drain, excavation, or fill will not block fish passage; and the drain, excavation, or fill activity will be conducted in compliance with all other applicable federal, state, and local requirements; including best management practices and water resource protection requirements established under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 103 =2V-0; (Signature ofApplicant) (Date) Page 2 of 3 Goers_exempt_forrn.doc (April 2003) Note: This approval is not effective until the signatures below are complete. No work should begin until the 30 -day appeal window has lapsed, or, in the event of an appeal, until the appeal has been finalized LGU USE ONLY k.) LGU has received adequate documentation for claim of No -Loss or Exemption, and approves this certificate as c /abovy 10 11 In SThis certificate expires (Date) (L Official igaatute) (Date) 1 ➢ If this certificate applies to 8420.0122, Subp. 1 or Subp. 2B, then Item B below shall be completed and signed by the LGU. ➢ If not, the LGU shall write "Not Applicable" in signature block below and the certificate is complete. LGU has received evidence of recording of Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Impacted Wetland Under Agricultural Exemption (BWSR Form B): /bT P�PPL.Ic_Ac6ts., (County where recorded) (Date recorded) Official (Document # assigned by recorder) *APPROVAL OF THIS CERTIFICATE ONLYAPPLIES TO THE WCA. Permitsfromlocal, state, andfederalagencies may be required. Check with the appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. The Combined Project Application form can be used for this purpose. Notice of the above decision must be mailed to the following parties within 10 working days of the decision: 1. Landowner/Applicant 2. Members of the Technical Evaluation Panel 3. Watershed District or Watershed Management Organization (If Applicable) 4. Department of Natural Resources Regional Office 5. DNR Wetlands Coordinator @ Ecological Services Section 500 Lafayette Road, Box 25 St. Paul, MN 55155 6. Corps of Engineers Project Manager @ Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District ATTN: CO -R, 190 Fifth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101-1638 7. Members of the public who have requested to receive notice. Page 3 of 3 Goers_ exempt_fonn.doc (April 2003) 0 2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. / 7 t _- \ s ` � \C\ \ :Tann i e m goo I(.. 1 ` IO 1 !r k \., i �:...� \ 1 f /�'fv >t X y.. ,} °� ' II: La AtP \ -Us nn j Data Source(s): USGS/MnDNR DRG (Shakopee. Revised 1993). Legend = Approximate Property Boundary Map Document: (P:\20051114\gis\20051114drgOtA.mxd) 9/14/2005 — 12:48:51 PM wWestwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952-937-5150 0 2,000 Goers Property Chanhassen, Minnesota N Feet 4,000 Site Location and USGS Topography EXHIBIT 1 �• 'I j 1 ` IO 1 !r k \., i �:...� \ 1 f /�'fv >t X y.. ,} °� ' II: La AtP \ -Us nn j Data Source(s): USGS/MnDNR DRG (Shakopee. Revised 1993). Legend = Approximate Property Boundary Map Document: (P:\20051114\gis\20051114drgOtA.mxd) 9/14/2005 — 12:48:51 PM wWestwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952-937-5150 0 2,000 Goers Property Chanhassen, Minnesota N Feet 4,000 Site Location and USGS Topography EXHIBIT 1 c 2005 West oo Professional Services, Inc. Data Source(s): Aerials Express (2002), USFWS NW I (1989). Legend OApproximate Property Boundary NWI Wetlands Map Document. (P:\20051114\gis\20051114nwi01 A.mxd) 8117/2005 -- 12:56:11 PM wWestwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952-937-5150 Feet 0 200 400 Goers Propert National Wetlands r y Inventory Mapping Chanhassen, Minnesota EXHIBIT 2 ® 2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Data Source(s): Aerials Express (2002). Mel Council. Digital Soil Survey -Carver County (2(x)4). N Legend Feet 9 0 200 400 Approximate Property Boundary _ Hydric Soil Map Document: (P:120051114\gis120051114soi101A.mxd) 8/17/2005 -- 1:02:04 PM wWestwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 957-937-5150 Goers Property Chanhassen, Minnesota Soils Mapping C 2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Data Source(s): USDA FSA APFO, DOQ (2003), WPS (2005). Legend QApproximate Property Boundary Wetland Within Property Delineated Wetland Map Document: (P:\20051114\gis\20051114wtIdOt A.mxd) 9/13/2005 -- 12:44:41 PM WWestwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952-937-5150 Goers Property Chanhassen, Minnesota Fee 600 Wetland Boundary Map EXHIBIT 4 T` r I ' A� . s r .. L NlG � \ f; T o F I C, f 711 \TI(V """'"'"''"` Goers Property Chanhassen, Minnesota 1937 HIG Project Number: MAF -2472 Client Project Number: 20051114 Approximate Scale 1:6000(1"=500'1 VIP .F f �! _• ` ! ♦' "°ftaw— ; /1 „. I CI I Ll I ftll0.�:11,r/ Goers Property Chanhassen, Minnesota 1940 r' Y% HIG Project Number: MAF -2472 Client Project Number: 20051114 Approximate Scale 1:6000[1 "=500'] I t -;amp llll�- HiG H ISTORICAL INFORMATION 'ATHFRf Rf.IN( Goers Property Chanhassen, Minnesota 1951 r' '76 r� HIG Project Number: MAF -2472 Client Project Number: 20051114 Approximate Scale 1:6000[1"=500') � t f - . r > r • . a g, i -' < 1 « ^^ a : - �> EJ 2 �� __ Goers Property De@ee,Uw_s a 1957 r« r ¥ < ` ` _ m Number: _R»@2 Client _E_mmm«a Approximate Scal.,morn®mm r ARA % 41P 0% •s w i One � �� * • ` lva .A' AL _. HI / , T 11 R r • I.\fit R 11%TI ON Goers Property Chanhassen, Minnesota 1963 HID Project Number: MAF -2472 Client Project Number: 200511 14 Approximate Scale 1:6000[1"=500') 04 w 4 w !. �. k w ~ OL N ��! u }(jC /� " • • i. roa.,nav Goers Property Chanhassen, Minnesota 1970 "rte...^�• HIG Project Number: MAF -2472 Client Project Number: 20051114 • • •♦ ' 2;_.y � !�'-.fes+� • •, is. • ` r ,� y If w !. �. k w ~ OL N ��! u }(jC /� " • • i. roa.,nav Goers Property Chanhassen, Minnesota 1970 r' N rtf HIG Project Number: MAF -2472 Client Project Number: 20051114 Approximate Scale 1:6000(1"=500'1 0.00.4 � 5 r d J ll 7 _ VJs. f Rs NiG F * • n c. INFORM\TION °A`"I""''N` Goers Property Chanhassen, Minnesota 1979 r' '7y C HIG Project Number: KAAF-2472 Client Project Number: 20051114 Approximate Scale 1:6000(1"=500'] 1 TlG Goers Property Chanhassen, Minnesota 1984 HIG Project Number: MAF -2472 Client Project Number: 200511 14 1, 1 . T u akc , 1 1\FORMT1ON "1111"` IJ"` Approximate Scale 1:6000(1"=500') r ` 3 =f Hl� /•� i. ro v.uno: Goers Property Chanhassen, Minnesota 1991 ^' HIGProject Number : MAF -2472 Client Project Number: 20051114 Approximate Scale 1 6000 (1 "=500') it r. VE- All, All" r i r �,. + F �- P F t"? rf r :!¢ 7 .� k. N1C H I. T O R I c A L I NFOR N ATION O A10 ERE R',INC Goers Property Chanhassen, Minnesota 1997 ^' r< HIG Project Number: MAF -2472 Client Project Number. 20051114 Approximate Scale 1:6000[1"=500'] rFdP' Jj 4m; 40!� Jw c 1 +c'if 1 fig. lk OA �Jt - N v . lw,71I r n`JR Name and address of local government unit:City of Chanhassen The undersigned certifies on October 12 , 2005 , he/she mailed copies of the attached Notice of Wetland Conservation Act Decision to the addressees listed thereon by depositing the same in the United States Mail in the City of Chanhassen County of Carver and State of Minnesota, properly enveloped with prepaid first class postage. Signature Natural Resource Technician Title Page 1 of 1 Goers Cert Mail Notice Decision 10/12/2005 Date (April 2003) Name and Address of Local Government Unit: City of Chanhassen, 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Name of Applicant: Mr. Nathan Franzen, Plowshares Project Name: Goers Property Application Number: Type of Application (check one): ® Exemption Decision ❑ No Loss Decision ❑ Replacement Plan Decision ❑ Banking Plan Decision ❑ Wetland Type/Boundary Decision Date of Decision: 10/12/05 Check One: ® Approved ❑ Approved with conditions (see note on page 2 regarding use of wetland banking credits) ❑ Denied Summary of Project/Decision (indicate exemption number per MN Rule 8420.0122, if applicable): The applicant is Proposing a single family residential development in the City of Chanhassen. The proposed development may require fill of exempt Wetlands A, B, C. E and F, located at the northern end of the parcel. See attached findings and conclusions for details of decision. List of Addressees: Landowner: Mike Goers 1601 Lyman Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Members of Technical Evaluation Panel: Greg Graczyk, Carver Soil and Water Conservation District Brad Wozney, Board of Water and Soil Resources Watershed District or Watershed Management Organization (If Applicable): Bob Obermeyer, Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District -Page 1 of 2 Goers Exemption Notice of Decision 10/12/05 Department of Natural Resources Regional Office (select a ro riate office): DNR TEP Representative (if different than above) Julie Ekman, DNR Hydrologist NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southem Region: Regional Director Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. ErnL Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. NE Div. Ecol. Services Div. Ecol. Services Div. Ecol. Services Bemidji, MN 5660] 1201 E. Hwy. 2 1200 Warner Road 261 Hwy. 15 South Grand Rapids, MN 55744 St. Paul MN 55106 New Ulm, MN 56073 Corp of Engineers Project Manager @ Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District ATTN: CO -R, 190 Fifth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101-1638 Individual members of the public who requested a copy, summary only Gen Bolling, Westwood Professional Services Mr. Nathan Franzen, Plowshares Development You are hereby notified that the decision of the Local Government Unit on the above - referenced application was made on the date stated above. A copy of the Local Government Unit's Findings and Conclusions is attached. Pursuant to Minn. R. 8420.0250 any appeal of the decision must be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal to the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice. NOTE: Approval of Wetland Replacement Plan Applications involving the use of wetland banking credits is conditional upon withdrawal of the appropriate credits from the state wetland bank. No wetland impacts may commence until the applicant receives a copy of the fully signed and executed "Application for Withdrawal of Wetland Credits," signed by the BWSR wetland bank administrator certifying that the wetland bank credits have been debited. THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT Signature Da Don Asleson, Natural Resource Technician Name and Title - Page 2 of 2 Goers Exemption Notice of Decision 10/12/05 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard • P.O. Box 147 • Chanhassen, MN 55317 Name of Applicant: Mr. Nathan Franzen, Plowshares Development. Project Location: NW 1/4 of Section 23 Township 116N Range 23 W Type of Application (check one): ❑ Delineation Decision ❑x Exemption Decision ❑ No Loss Decision ❑ Replacement Plan Decision ❑ Banking Plan Decision Date of Decision: October, 12 2005 Findings and Conclusions 1. After review of the Wetland delineation completed by Westwood Professional Services dated September 14 2005. The City of Chanhassen agrees with the applicant that wetlands A, B, C, E and F are incidental wetlands that were not created solely for the purpose of creating wetland and are therefore exempt from WCA jurisdiction. The decision is based off of review of FSA and HIG photographs from 1937- present, Wets precipitation data from 1979 to present and the wetland delineation report dated September 14, 2005. Wetland characteristics appeared in wetlands A, B, C, E and F after development to the north and east of the Goers property had been established. 2. Wedand A did not appear during the air photo review until after the development to the north was created. This wetland is therefore incidental and does not have WCA jurisdiction. 3. Wetland B was created as a temporary ponding basin with the development to the north and was not intended to be permanent, created wetland. This wetland does not appear on aerial photos until around 1996 and coincides with the development to the north. Wetland B therefore is an incidental basin and does not have WCA jurisdiction. 4. Wetland C during the photo review does not appear until the installation of the temporary ponding "Wetland B". The outlet of wetland B was verified by staff to be directly discharging into Wetland C. Wetland B was not created solely for the purpose of creating wetland and is incidental to the infrastructure for the development to the north. Air photo review supports that a wetland did not exist prior to the installation of Wetland B; Therefore Wetland C is an incidental basin and is not within WCA jurisdiction. 5. Wetland E does not appear on historical photos. Wetland E is most likely the result of an undersized storm water pond with a failing outlet to the Northeast. The additional hydrology from the infrastructure to the north coincides with the formation of wetland E. Due to the unintentional creation of wetland this wetland is incidental to the development to the north and therefore exempt from WCA jurisdiction. 6. Wetland F does not appear on any air photos prior to the adjacent development and appears to be incidental due to the grading of the development to the north. This wetland is therefore exempt from WCA jurisdiction. CITY OF CHANHASSEN Title: Natural Resource Technician Date: 10/12/2005 SV;W FEE WORKSHEET DATE November 4, 2005 PLANNING CASE 05-37 PROJECT Stonefield Site Area in Acres 17.63 Outlot A (0.42) Assessable area 17.21 ZONING CLASSIFICATION Low Density Residential WATER QUALITY WATER QUANTITY FEES Rate per Acre Acres Total S 1,093.00 17.21 $ 18,810.53 Rate per Acre Acres Total $ 2,705.00 17.21 $ 46,553.05 CREDITS ITEM UNIT QUANTITY 50% UNIT TOTAL PRICE Storm water pond acre 0.5 $ 1,093.00 $ - Outlet structure each $ 2,500.00 $ - 1 MW FEE $ 65,363.58 SWW CREDITS $ - TOTAL SWMP FEE $ 65,363.58 ® 2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Data Source(s): USDA FSA APFO. DOQ (2003). WPS (2005). Legend Wetland Within Property = Approximate Property Boundary Delineated Wetland Approximate Transect Location - Hydric Soil Map Document: (P:\20051114\gis\20051114wtIdOl A.mxd) 9/13/2005 -- 12:44:41 PM WWestwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952-937-5150 0 300 Property Chanhassen, Minnesota Feet 600 Wetland Boundary Map EXHIBIT 4 La i3 ` Ll- Westwood Professional Services, Inc. WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM (ROUTINE DETERMINATION METHOD) Project Name/Job No.: Goers Property/20051114 Date: August 18, 2005 Investigator(s): Westwood Prof. Services - Genevieve Boding City/Twsp. Chanhassen Wetland Identification: Wetland A County & State Caver/MN Transect Sample Point: Flag Al # of Flags: Al -A7 Circium arvense H VEGETATION SAMPLE POINT wet side O Upside ❑ NIA ❑ Common Name Dominants a20percent) SCientifiC Name Stratum % Cover Ind. Status Reed cana rass Phalaris arundinacea H 100 FACW- % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 100 Remarks: Overall Dominant Vegetation/Community: Reed canary grass /Type 1 - Temporarily Flooded basin SAMPLE POINT Wet side ❑ UD side 0 NIA ❑ Common Name Dominants >_ 20 percent Scientific Name Stratum % Cover Ind. Status Smooth brome Broutus inermis H 80 UPL Box elder Acrene-gundo T 50 FACW- Canada thistle Circium arvense H 20 UPL Flattened Vegetation Undetermined - Explain: Drama a Pattems Remarks: below toe of slope % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 33 Remarks: Overall Dominant Ve etation/Communi : See plants listed above/Wooded upland SAMPLE POINT HYDROLOGY Wet side rxl Un side Fl NIA Fl Primary Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators 2 required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels X Yes Saturated, Depth (in) Water -Stained Leaves No Water in borehole, Depth (in) >27 X Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test X Assumed - Explain: two Drift Lines X Topographic Position secondary indicators Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: Flattened Vegetation Undetermined - Explain: Drama a Pattems Remarks: below toe of slope SAMPLE POINT Wet side ❑ Uo side N NIA ❑ PrimaryHydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators 2 required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels Yes Saturated, Depth (in) - 7 Water -Stained Leaves X No: Water in borehole, Depth (in) >74 Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test Assumed - Explain: Drift Lines Topographic Position Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: Flattened Vegetation Undetermined - Explain: Drainage Patterns Remarks: above toe of slope; soils very dry 1 'Dor dere e dem sineeq Dry ( rlo6ji 4 w� sods sol �-Fc Westwood Professional Services, Inc. WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM (ROUTINE DETERMINATION METHOD) Project Name: Goers Property Job No.: 20051114 Wetland Identification: Wetland A Transect Sample Point: Flag Al SOILS Mineral Hydric Soil Colors= Matrix with a Value a 4 and a Chroma of <_ 2 in mottled soils or < 1 in unmottled soils. Soil colors measured directly below the A -horizon within the soil profile. Moist Soil Matrix Munsell Color Mottle Abundance = Few (Q% of exposed surface), Common (2-20% of exposed surface), Many (>20% of exposed surface). Mottle Contrast (matrix to redox) = Faint (closely related hues and chromas), Distinct (differ by 1 to 2 hues and several units in chrome and value), Prominent (vary several units in hue, value, and chrome). Al AL Histosol A9,10.1-2 cm Muck S6. Stripped Matrix F5. Thick Dark Surface A2. Histic Epipedon Sl. Sandy Mucky Material Fl. Loamy Mucky Material F6. Redox Dark Surface A3. Black Histic S3. Mucky Peat/Peat F2. Loamy Gleyed Matrix 177. Depleted Dark Surface A4. Hydrogen Sulfide S4. Sandy Gleyed Matrix F3. Depleted Matrix F8. Redox Depressions A5. Stratified Layers S5. Sandy Redox F4. Depleted Below Dark Surface Field Indicators of H tlric Sails (Midwest Re ion USDA, March 1998. A=all soils, S =sen soils, F =loam & cla a soils SAMPLE POINT Wetside X Up ❑ NIA ❑ Mapped Soil Type Hamel loam 'ide Depth inches Horizon Moist Soil Matrix Munsell Color Moist Mottle Matrix Munsell Color Mottle Abundance/Contrast Texture 0-13 Al 10YR 311 5Y 5/4 Distinct/Common Silt loam 13-22 Al/B 16Y11 3/1 None X Silty clay loam 22-27 B 10YR 3H SYR 314 Distinct/Common Silt loam 27+ A2 10YR 2/1 None N/A Silt clay loam Hydric Soil? X_ Yes No Undetermined Remarks: Meets F6 SAMPLE POINT wet side ❑ Up ❑x NIA ❑ Mapped Soil Type Hamel loam side Depth Horizon inches Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast 0-14 A 10YR 3/2 Sand loam ❑ Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes Hydric Soil? Yes X_ No Undetermined Remarks: soils are disturbed; 10YR 3/2 was the dominant matrix WETLAND DETERMINATION SAMPLE POINT Wet side X Upside ❑ NIA ❑ Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Is the area a wetland? X Yes No Remarks: Distance from Wetland Edge 5 ft. N/A 'Has the area been altered sufficiently 'Has the area been altered sufficiently to render the presence of Hydrophytic Ve etation, Wetland Hydrology, or Hydric Soils not applicable? JAMIFLt YUINI Wet side LJ Upside p9 N/A LJ Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Is the area a wetland? Yes X No Remarks: Distance from Wetland Edge 5 ft. N/A 'Has the area been altered sufficiently to render the presence of Hydrophytic Vegetation, Wetland Hydrology, or Hydric Soils not applica WETLAND BOUNDARY REMARKS The wetland boundary was flagged at the edge of the reed canary grass and/or toe of slope. 2 Revised 06117102 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM (ROUTINE DETERMINATION METHOD) Project Name/Job No.: Goers Property/20051114 Date: August 18, 2005 Investigator(s): Westwood Prof. Services - Genevieve Bolling City/Twsp. Chanhassen Wetland Identification: Wetland B County & State Caver/MN Transect Sample Point: Flag B1 # of Flags: BI -1313 Phalarir arundinacea H VEGETATION SAMPLE POINT Wetside [q Upside ❑ NIA ❑ Common Name Dominants >_ 20percent) Scientific Name Kentucky bluegrass % Cover -TOBL Boxelder Sand bar willow Salix exi a T 50 X Water in borehole, Depth (in) 3 Box elder Acer ne ndo T 50 Assumed - Reed cana ass Phalarir arundinacea H 20 Other - Explain: Smanweed Pol onum s . H 20 Drainage Patterns Pu le loosestrife L thrum salicaria H 20 Flattened Vegetation Undetermined - Explain: Drainage Patterns Remarks: above toe of slope; soils very dry % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 100 Remarks: Overall Dominant Ve etation/Communi en water with cattail frin e/I' e 3 - Shallow marsh SAMPLE POINT Wet side ❑ Up side O NIA ❑ Common Name(Dominants >:20 percent Scientific Name Stratum % Cover Ind. Status Kentucky bluegrass Poo pratensis H 100 FAC- AGBox Boxelder Acernegundo T 100 FAWC- X Saturated, Depth (in) 0 Water -Stained Leaves No X Water in borehole, Depth (in) 3 X_ Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Saturated, Depth (in) Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test Assumed - Drift Lines X Topographic Position Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 100 Remarks: Overall Dominant Ve etation/Coinatuni : See plants listed above/Wooded upland SAMPLE POINT HYDROLOGY Wet side Fxl Un side rl NIA rl Primary HydroloAy Indicatory Secondary Hydrology Indicators 2required) Wetland Hydrolo Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels X Yes X Saturated, Depth (in) 0 Water -Stained Leaves No X Water in borehole, Depth (in) 3 X_ Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Saturated, Depth (in) Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test Assumed - Drift Lines X Topographic Position Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: Flattened Vegetation Assumed - Explain: Undetermined - Explain: Drainage Patterns Remarks: .7AnIrLt rVIN I wet side LJ up side LxJ NIA Li Primary Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators 2 required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels Yes Saturated, Depth (in) Water -Stained Leaves X No: Water in borehole, Depth (in) >15 Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test Assumed - Explain: Drift Lines Topographic Position Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: Flattened Vegetation Undetermined - Explain: Drainage Patterns Remarks: above toe of slope; soils very dry 1 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM (ROUTINE DETERMINATION METHOD) Project Name: Goers Property Job No.: 20051114 Wetland Identification: Wetland B Transect Sample Point: Flag BI SOILS Mineral Hydric Soil Colors = Matrix with a Value a 4 and a Chroma of < 2 in mottled soils or < 1 in unmottled soils. Soil colors measured directly below the A -horizon within the soil profile. Moist Mottle Matrix Mottle Munsell Color Abundance/Contrast Texture Mottle Abundance = Few (<2% of exposed surface), Common (2-20% of exposed surface), Many (>20% of exposed surface). Mottle Contrast (matrix to redox) = Faint (closely related hues and chromas), Distinct (differ by 1 to 2 hues and several units in chroma and value), Prominent (vary several units In hue, value, and chroma). Yes Al. Histosol A9,10.1-2 cm Muck S6. Stripped Matrix F5. Thick Dark Surface A2. Histic Epipedon Sl. Sandy Mucky Material Fl. Loamy Mucky Material F6. Redox Dark Surface A3. Black Histic S3. Mucky Peat/Peat F2. Loamy Gleyed Matrix F7. Depleted Dark Surface A4. Hydrogen Sulfide S4. Sandy Gleyed Matrix F3. Depleted Matrix F8. Redox Depressions A5. Stratified Layers S5. Sandy Redox F4. Depleted Below Dark Surface Field Indicators of Hydric Soils (Midwest Region) USDA. March 1998. A= all soils, S = sanq soils, F = loamy & clayey soils SAMPLE POINT wet side O nP ❑ N/A E]d MappeSoil Type Hamel loam Depth inches Horizon Moist Soil Matrix Munsell Color Moist Mottle Matrix Mottle Munsell Color Abundance/Contrast Texture 0-6 A 10YR 2/1 None Mucky peat W X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Hydric Soil? X Yes No Undetermined Remarks: Meets F1 Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ ' SAMPLE POINT Wet side ❑ Up O N/A ❑ Mapped Soil Type Hamel loam side Horizon Matrix Color Munsell Moist Mottle Colors Mottle Texture Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast A 10YR 2/1 None Sil claoil? W X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Undetermined : no mottles in upper 12" Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ WETLAND DETERMINATION SAMPLE POINT Wet side ® Upside ❑ WA ❑ Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Is the area a wetland? X Yes No Remarks: Distance from Wetland Edge 5 ft. N/A 'Has the area been altered sufficient) to render the preserwe of Hydrophytic Ve etation, Wetland H ricology, or Hydric Soils nota livable? AAMYLt YUINI Wet side LJ Upside L+J N/A LJ Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Is the area a wetland? Yes X No Remarks: Distance from Wetland Edge 5 ft. N/A 'Has the area been altered sufficiently to render the presence of Hydrophytic Ve etation, Wetland Hydrology, or Hydric Soils not applica WETLAND BOUNDARY REMARKS The wetland boundary was flagged at the toe of slope. 2 Revised 06/17/02 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM (ROUTINE DETERMINATION METHOD) Project Name/Job No.: Goers Property/20051114 Date: August 18, 2005 Investigator(s): Westwood Prof. Services—Genevieve Bolting Citylrwsp. Chanhassen Wetland Identification: Wetland C County & State Caver/MN Transect Sample Point: Flag Cl # of Flags: Cl -C20 X Topographic Position indicators VEGETATION SAMPLE POINT Wet side rxl Un side ❑ N/A ❑ Common Name Dominants a 20percent) Scientific Name Stratum- % Cover - Ind. Status Spotted touch-me-not Impatiens ca renis H 90 FAC%�r Sandbar willow Salix exigua S/T 100 OBL Saturated, Depth (in) >36 Water -Stained Leaves No Water in borehole, Depth (in) )( Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Saturated, Depth (in) Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test X_ Assumed — two secondary Drift Lines X Topographic Position indicators Va of Dominants FAC or wetter: 100 Remarks: Overall Dominant Vegetation/Community: See plants listed abovelr e 6 — Shrub swam SAMPLE POINT Wetside ❑ Up side 9 NIA ❑ Common Name Dominants_ 20percent) Scientific Name Stratum % Cover Ind. Status Kentucky bluegrass Poa pralensis H 100 FAC - Box elder Acernegundo T 100 FAWC- Saturated, Depth (in) >36 Water -Stained Leaves No Water in borehole, Depth (in) )( Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Saturated, Depth (in) Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test X_ Assumed — two secondary Drift Lines X Topographic Position indicators Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 100 Remarks: Overall Dominant Ve etation/Communi : See plants listed above/Wooded upland SAMPLE POINT HYDROLOGY Wet side O Un side ❑ N/A ❑ Primary Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators 2 required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels X_ Yes Saturated, Depth (in) >36 Water -Stained Leaves No Water in borehole, Depth (in) )( Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Saturated, Depth (in) Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test X_ Assumed — two secondary Drift Lines X Topographic Position indicators Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: Flattened Vegetation Assumed - Explain: Undetermined - Explain: Drainage Patterns Remarks: below toe of slope 1 �v= Primary Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators 2 required Wetland Hydrology Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels Yes Saturated, Depth (in) Water -Stained Leaves X No: Water in borehole, Depth (in) >15 Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test Assumed - Explain: Drift Lines Topographic Position Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: Flattened Vegetation Undetermined - Explain: Drainage Patterns Remarks: above toe of slope; soils very dry 1 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM (ROUTINE DETERMINATION METHOD) Project Name: Goers Property Job No.: 20051114 Wetland Identification: NNetland C Transect Sample Point: Flag CI SOILS Mineral Hydric Soil Colors = Matrix with a Value i 4 and a Chroma of <_ 2 in mottled soils or <_ 1 in unmottled soils. Soil colors measured directly below the A -horizon within the soil profile. Moist Soil Matrix Munsell Color Mottle Abundance = Few (<2% of exposed surface), Common (2-20% of exposed surface), Many (>20% of exposed surface). Mottle Contrast (matrix to redox) = Faint (closely related hues and chromas), Distinct (differ by 1 to 2 hues and several units in chroma and value), Prominent (vary several units in hue, value, and chroma). Al Al. Histosol A9,10. 1-2 cm Muck S6. Stripped Matrix F5. Thick Dark Surface A2. Histic Epipedon Sl. Sandy Mucky Material Fl. Loamy Mucky Material F6. Redox Dark Surface A3. Black Histic S3. Mucky Peat/Peat F2. Loamy Gleyed Matrix F?. Depleted Dark Surface A4. Hydrogen Sulfide S4. Sandy Gleyed Matrix F3. Depleted Matrix F8. Redox Depressions A5. Stratified Layers S5. Sandy Redox F4. Depleted Below Dark Surface Field Indicators of ric Soils Midwest R ion USDA. March 1998. A =all soils, 5 = san soils, F =loam 8 cla soils SAMPLE POINT Wet side I] Up ❑ NIA ❑ Mapped Soil Type Terril loam side Depth inches Horizon Moist Soil Matrix Munsell Color Moist Mottle Matrix Munsell Color Mottle Abundance/Contrast Texture 0-19 Al 10YR 3/1 10YR 3/4 Common/Faint Silt loam 19-26 Al10YR 3/1 10YR 3/3 Common/Faint Silt loam 26-36 A2 10YR 211 None Yes Mucky loam Hydric Soil? X_ Yes No Undetermined ft. N/A Remarks: Meets F6 to render the oresence of Hvdronhvtic Vegetation. Wetland Hvdroloov. or Hvddc Soils not aoDlica N/A SAMPLE POINT Wet side ❑ _i? ® NIA ❑ Mapped Soil Type Terrill loam Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture inches Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast 0-15 A Mixed Fill Hydric Soil? Yes X No Undetermined Remarks: No mottlin ; Soils are highly disturbed WETLAND DETERMINATION SAMPLE POINT Wet side ® Upside ❑ N/A ❑ Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' /s the area a wetland? X Yes No Remarks: Distance from Wetland Edge 5 ft. N/A `Has the area been altered sufficiently to render the oresence of Hvdronhvtic Vegetation. Wetland Hvdroloov. or Hvddc Soils not aoDlica SAMPLE POINT Wet side ❑ Upside 19 NIA ❑ Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes` Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Is the area a wetland? Yes X No Remarks: Distance from Wetland Edge 5 ft. N/A 'Has the area been altered sufficiently to render the presence of Hydrophyfic Vegetation, Wetland Hydrology, or Hydric Soils notapplicable? WETLAND BOUNDARY REMARKS The wetland boundary was Flagged at the edge of dominant hydrophytic vegetation. 2 Revised 06/17/02 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM (ROUTINE DETERMINATION METHOD) Project Name/Job No.: Goers Property/20051114 Date: August 18, 2005 Investigator(s): Westwood Prof. Services - Genevieve Bolling City/Twsp. Chanhassen Wetland Identification: Wetland D County & State Caver/NtN Transect Sample Point: Flag Dl # of Flags: D1 -D19; Dal-Da21 X Topographic Position VEGETATION SAMPLE POINT Wetside Q Upside ❑ NIA ❑ Common NameDominants>_ 20percent) Scientific Name Stratum I % Cover Ind. Status % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 0 Remarks: Overall Dominant Ve etation/Communi : Sandy channel, devoid of vegetation/ R4UBA - Temporarily flooded riverine s stem SAMPLE POINT wet side ❑ Upside © NIA ❑ Common Name Dominants >_ 20 percent Scient�C Name Stratum % Cover Ind. Status Su ar maple Acer saccharum T 100 FACU Common buckthorn , Rhamnus cathartica S 100 FAC-, Saturated, Depth (in) Water -Stained Leaves No Water in borehole, Depth (in) Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test Assumed - Drift Lines X Topographic Position Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 0 Remarks: Overall Dominant Vegetation/Community: See plants listed above/Wooded slopes HYDROLOGY SAMPLE POINT Wetside 0 Upside ❑ NIA ❑ Primary Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators 2 required) Wetland Hydrology Present? X Inundated, Depth (in) 1 Oxidized Root Channels X 1 es Saturated, Depth (in) Water -Stained Leaves No Water in borehole, Depth (in) Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test Assumed - Drift Lines X Topographic Position Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: Flattened Vegetation Undetermined - Explain: Drainage Patterns Remarks: below toe of slope SAMPLE POINT wet side ❑ Upside O N/A ❑ Primary Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators 2 required) Wetland Hydrology 'Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels Yes Saturated, Depth (in) Water -Stained Leaves X No: Water in borehole, Depth (in) >12 Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test Assumed - Explain: Drift Lines Topographic Position Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: Flattened Vegetation Undetermined - Explain: Drainage Patterns Remarks: above toe of slope; soils very dry 1 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM (ROUTINE DETERMINATION METHOD) Project Name: Goers Property Job No.: 20051114 Wetland Identification: Wetland D Transect Sample Point: Flag Dl SOILS Mineral Hydric Soil Colors = Matrix with a Value 2 4 and a Chroma of 5 2 in mottled soils or <_ 1 in unmottled soils. Soil colors measured directly below the A -horizon within the soil profile. Mottle Abundance = Few (<2% of exposed surface), Common (2-20% of exposed surface), Many (>20% of exposed surface). Mottle Contrast (matrix to redox) = Faint (closely related hues and chromas), Distinct (differ by 1 to 2 hues and several units in chroma and value), Prominent (vary several units in hue, value, and chroma). Al. Histosol A9,10.1-2 cm Muck S6. Stripped Matrix F5. Thick Dark Surface A2. Histic Epipedon SI. Sandy Mucky Matcrial Fl. Loamy Mucky Material F6. Redox Dark Surface A3. Black Histic S3. Mucky Peat/Peat F2. Loamy Gleyed Matrix F7. Depleted Dark Surface A4. Hydrogen Sulfide S4. Sandy Gleyed Matrix F3. Depleted Matrix F8. Redox Depressions A5. Stratified Layers S5. Sandy Redox F4. Depleted Below Dark Surface Field Indicators of Hydric Soils Midwest Region) USDA, March 1998. (A = all soils, S = sandy soils, F = loamy 8 clayey soils SAMPLE POINT wet side O Up ❑ N/A ❑ Mapped Soil Type Kilkenny -Lester loam side Depth Moist Soil Matrix Moist Mottle Matrix Mottle inches Horizon Texture Munsell Color Munsell Color Abundance/Contrast Hydric Soil? X Yes No Undetermined Remarks: Channel filled with sediment, no sample taken, assumed to flood for the required duration SAMPLE POINT wet side ❑ Up ❑x N/A ❑ Mapped Soil Type Kilkenny -Lester loam side Depth Horizon inches Matrix Color Munsell Moist Mottle Colors Mottle Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Texture 0-12 A 10YR 3/2 None Sandy loam Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes` Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes Hydric Soil? Yes X No Undetermined Remarks: No mottling in upper 12 inches No SAMPLE POINT Wet side ❑ WETLAND DETERMINATION SAMPLE POINT wet side ® Up side ❑ N/A ❑ Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes` Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Is the area a wetland? X Yes No Remarks: Distance from Wetland Edge 5 ft. N/A 'Has the area been altered sufficiently to render the presence of HvdrODhvtic Vegetation, Wetland Hvdroloqv. or Hydric Soils not applicable? SAMPLE POINT Wet side ❑ Upside 0 N/A ❑ Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes` Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Is the area a wetland? Yes X No Remarks: Distance from Wetland Edge 5 ft. N/A 'Has the area been altered sufficient!y to render the presence of Hydrophytic Ve elation, Wetland Hydrology, or Hydric Soils notapplicable? WETLAND BOUNDARY REMARKS The wetland boundary was flagged at the toe of slope. 2 Revised 06/17/02 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM (ROUTINE DETERMINATION METHOD) Project Name/Job No.: Goers Property/20051114 Date: August 18, 2005 Investigator(s): Westwood Prof. Services - Genevieve Bolling Citylrwsp. Chanhassen Wetland Identification: Wetland E County & State Caver/MN Transect Sample Point: Flag EI # of Flags: El -E20 X Topographic Position .. % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 0 VEGETATION SAMPLE POINT Wet side O Upside ❑ N/A ❑ Common Name(Dominants >:20percent) Scientific Name Stratum % Cover Ind. Status Reed canary grass Phalaris artindinacea I I so FA( %l- Riaer bulrush Scirpus fluviatilis H 20 OBL X Yes Saturated, Depth (in) >22 Water -Stained Leaves No Water in borehole, Depth (in) Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test,/, X_ Assumed - two secondary Drift Lines X Topographic Position .. % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 0 Remarks: Overall Dominant Vegetation/Community: Reed canary grass. River bulrush/ Type 2 - R'et meadow SAMPLE POINT Wetside ❑ Upside O N/A ❑ Common Name(Dominants >-2o percent) ScientiTicName Stratum %Cover Ind. Status Soy beans Glycine maxima li 50 UPL Bare soil 30 % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 0 Remarks: Overall Dominant Ve etation/Communi : Planted soy beans HYDROLOGY SAMPLE POINT Wet side rxl U. side Fl N/A Fl Primary Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators 2 required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels X Yes Saturated, Depth (in) >22 Water -Stained Leaves No Water in borehole, Depth (in) Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test,/, X_ Assumed - two secondary Drift Lines X Topographic Position .. indicators Sediment Deposits X Other - Explain: FlattenVegetation Undetermined - Explain: Drainage= Remarks: below toe of slope; dominant plants are wetter than FACW SAMPLE POINT Wet side ❑ Up side 0 N/A ❑ Primary Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators 2 required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels Yes Saturated, Depth (in) Water -Stained Leaves X No: Water in borehole, Depth (in) >20 Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test Assumed - Explain: Drift Lines Topographic Position Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: Flattened Vegetation Undetermined - Explain: Drainage Patterns Remarks: above toe of slope; soils very dry 1 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM (ROUTINE DETERMINATION METHOD) Project Name: Goers Property Job No.: 20051114 Wetland Idenfification: Wetland E Transect Sample Point: Flag E13 SOILS Mineral Hydric Soil Colors= Matrix with a Value a 4 and a Chroma of S2 in mottled soils or <_ 1 in unmottled soils. Soil colors measured directly below the A -horizon within the soil profile. Moist Mottle Matrix Munsell Color Mottle Abundance = Few (<2% of exposed surface), Common (2-20% of exposed surface), Many (>20% of exposed surface). Mottle Contrast (matrix to redox) = Faint (closely related hues and chromas), Distinct (differ by 1 to 2 hues and several units in chrome and value), Prominent (vary several units in hue, value, and chrome). Common/Distinct Silt loam Al. Histosol A9,10.1-2 cm Muck S6. Stripped Matrix F5. Thick Dark Surface A2. Histic Epipedon S1. Sandy Mucky Material FI. Loamy Mucky Material F6. Redox Dark Surface A3. Black Histic S3. Mucky Peat/Peat F2. Loamy Gleyed Matrix F7. Depleted Dark Surface A4. Hydrogen Sulfide S4. Sandy Gleyed Matrix 173. Depleted Matrix F8. Redox Depressions A5. Stratified Layers S5. Sandy Redox F4. Depleted Below Dark Surface Field Indicators of H dric Soils Midwest R ion USDA, March 1998. (A = all soils, S = sandy soils, F = loamL& cla a soils SAMPLE POINT Wetside 0 c �p [I NIA ❑ Mapped Soil Type Hamel loam Depth inches Horizon Moist Soil Matr x Munsell Color Moist Mottle Matrix Munsell Color Mottle Abundance/Contrast Texture 0-19 A 10YR 3/1 10YR 3/4 Common/Distinct Silt loam 19-22 B 5Y 5/2 10YR 5/6 Silt Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No Hydric Soil? X Yes No Undetermined X Remarks: Meets F6 No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ - SAMPLE POINT Wet side ❑s'uape I+@ NIA ❑ Mapped Sofl Type Hamel loam Depth Horizon inches Matrix Color Munsell Moist Mottle Colors Munsell; Moist Mottle Texture Abundance/Contrast 0-12 Al 10YR 2/1 10YR 3/4 Few/Distinct Silty clay loam 12-20 A2 10YR 2/1 None Clay loam Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No Hydric Soil? X Yes No Undetermined X Remarks: Meets F6 No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes* WETLAND DETERMINATION SAMPLE POINT Wet side ® Upside ❑ N/A ❑ Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes* Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes* Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes* Is the area a wetland? X Yes No Remarks: Distance from Wetland Edge 5 ft. N/A *Has the area been altered sufficient) to render the presence of Hydrophytic Ve etation, Welland Hydrology, or H ric Soils notapplicable? WETLAND BOUNDARY REMARKS The wetland boundary was Flagged at edge of dominant hydrophytic vegetation. 2 Revised 06/17102 Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes* Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes* Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes* Is the area a wetland? Yes X_ No Remarks: Distance from Wetland Edge 5 ft. N/A *Has the area been altered sufficiently to render the presence of Hydrophytic Vegetation Wetland Hydrology, or Hydric Soils not applica WETLAND BOUNDARY REMARKS The wetland boundary was Flagged at edge of dominant hydrophytic vegetation. 2 Revised 06/17102 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM (ROUTINE DETERMINATION METHOD) Project Name/Job No.: Goers Property/20051114 Date: August 18, 2005 Investigator(s): Westwood Prof. Services — Genevieve Bolling Cityf rwsp. Chanhassen Wetland Identification: Wetland F County & State Caver/MN Transect Sample Point: Flag F1 # of Flags: Fl -F9 X Topographic Position VEGETATION SAMPLE POINT wet side 0 Uoside ❑ NIA ❑ Common Name Dominants_ 20 erwnt Scientific Name Stratum % Cover Ind. Status Black willow Salic nigra T 100 OBL % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 100 1 Remarks: Reed canary grass Swale discharges into excavated basin Overall Dominant Vegetation/Community: Reed canary ass, black willow: Type 1 — Seasonally flooded basin SAMPLE POINT wee side ❑ un side rxl NIA F1 Common Name (Dominants 2:20 percent Scientific Name Stratum % Cover Ind. Status Kentucky blue grass Poe pratensis H 00 FAC- % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 0 Remarks: Overall Dominant Vegetation/Community: East: manicuried lawn; West: overgrown area dominated by sumac, box elder, sweet clover, smooth brome, and Canada golden rod HYDROLOGY SAMPLE POINT wet side © UD side ❑ NIA ❑ -Primary Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators 2 required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels X Yes X Saturated, Depth (in) 5 Water -Stained Leaves No X Water in borehole, Depth (in) 2 Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test Assumed - Explain: Drift Lines X Topographic Position Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: Flattened Vegetation Undetermined - Explain: Drainage Patterns Remarks: below toe of slope SAMPLE POINT wet side ❑ UD side O NIA ❑ Primary Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators 2 required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels Yes Saturated, Depth (in) >15 Water -Stained Leaves X No: Water in borehole, Depth (in) Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test Assumed - Explain: Drift Lines Topographic Position Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: Flattened Vegetation Undetermined - Explain: Drainage Patterns Remarks: above toe of slope 1 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM (ROUTINE DETERMINATION METHOD) Project Name: Goers Property Job No.: 20051114 Wetland Identification: Wetland F Transect Sample Point: Flag F1 SOILS Mineral Hydric Soil Colors = Matrix with a Value >_ 4 and a Chrome of <- 2 in mottled soils or <- 1 in unmerited soils. Soil colors measured directly below the A -horizon within the soil profile. 0-11 A Mottle Abundance = Few (<2% of exposed surface), Common (2-20% of exposed surface), Many (>20% of exposed surface). Mottle Contrast (matrix to retloxl = Faint (closely related hues and chromas), Distinct (differ by 1 to 2 hues and several units in chrome and value), Prominent (vary several units in hue, value, and chrome). Hydric Soil? X Al. Histosol A9,10.1-2 cm Muck S6. Stripped Matrix F5. Thick Dark Surface A2. Histic Epipedon Sl. Sandy Mucky Material Fl. Loamy Mucky Material F6. Redox Dark Surface A3. Black Histic S3. Mucky Peat/Peat F2. Loamy Gleyed Matrix F7. Depleted Dark Surface A4. Hydrogen Sulfide S4. Sandy Gleyed Matrix F3. Depleted Matrix F8. Redox Depressions A5. Stratified Layers S5. Sandy Redox F4. Depleted Below Dark Surface Field Indicators of Hydric Soils Midwest Region) USDA, March 1998. A= all soils, S = sandy soils, F = loamy 8 clayey soils SAMPLE POINT wet side O Up ❑ N/A ❑ Mapped Soil Type Terril loam side Depth i inches Hi Moist Soil Matrix Moist Mottle Matrix Mottle Texture Munsell Color Munsell Color Abundance/Contrast 0-11 A 10YR 3/1 None Sandy sediment ❑ Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes Hydric Soil? X Yes No Undetermined Remarks: Assumed to pond for the required duration SAMPLE POINT Wetside ❑ Up © NIA ❑ Mapped Soil Type Terril loam side Depth Horizon inches Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast 0-15 A 10YR3/2 Sandy laom ❑ Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes Hydric Soil? Yes X No Undetermined Remarks: X WETLAND DETERMINATION SAMPLE POINT Wet side ® Up side ❑ N/A ❑ Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Is the area a wetland? X Yes No Remarks: Distance from Wetland Edge 5 ft. N/A 'Has the area been altered sufficient) to render the presence of Hydrophyfic Vegetation, Wedand Hydrology, or Hydric Soils not applicable? JAfill YUIN I Wet side U Upside U N/A U Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Wetland Hydrology Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No Does an Atypical Situation Exist? ❑ Yes' Is the area a wetland? X_ Yes No Remarks: Distance from Wetland Edge 5 ft. N/A 'Has the area been altered sufficient) to render the presence of Hydrophytic Ve etation, Wetland Hydrology, or Hydric Soils not applicable? WETLAND BOUNDARY REMARKS The wetland boundary was flagged at the toe of slope. 2 Revised 06'17102 S TONEFIEL D KNOW ALL MEN BY 774ESE PRESENTS: That Plowshares Development, Inc., a Minnesota corporation„ fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Carver, State of Minnesota, to wit: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the following described line and its northerly and southerly extensions; Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 89 degrees 04 minutes 49 seconds West, bearing assumed, along the South line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 790.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 1 degree 57 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of 460.00 feet; thence North 18 degrees 32 minutes 33 seconds East, a distance of 330.00 feet; thence North 52 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 638.57 feet; thence North 1 degree 57 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of 150.59 feet to a point on the North line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter distant 156.07 feet Easterly of the Northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter as measured along said North line and there terminating. AND That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, described as follows, to—wit: The north 375.00 feet lying Westerly of the following described line, to—wit: Beginning at a point in the North line of said Southwest Quarter of Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) distant 849.31 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof- thence Southwesterly deflecting 64 degrees 42 minutes 04 seconds from West to South from said North line, a distance of 163.19 feet; thence Southerly deflecting to the left 32 degrees 35 minutes 37 seconds a distance of 125.62 feet; thence Southwesterly deflecting to the right 22 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds a distance of 302.23 feet; thence Southerly to the northwest corner of the East 290.75 feet of the West 484.2 feet of the South 539.7 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) as measured along the West and East lines of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4); thence South parallel with the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter to the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) and there terminating, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota. URN Outlot A, Shenandoah Ridge, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota. Abstract. Have caused the same to be surveyed and plotted as STONEFIELD and do hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use forever the lane and street and also dedicates the easements for drainage and utility purposes as shown on the plat. In witness whereof said Plowshares Development, Inc., a Minnesota corporation has caused these presents to be signed by Todd M. Simning its President this day c, , 200 . PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT, INC. is Todd M. Simning, President ST47E OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200 by Todd M. Simning the President of Plowshares Development, Inc., a Minnesota corporation on behalf of the company. By Notary Public County, Minnesota I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as STONEFIELD; that this plat is a correct representation of the survey, that all distances are correctly shown on the plat in feet and hundredths of a foot, that all monuments will be correctly placed in the ground as shown, in accordance to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.02, Subd. 1; that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on the plot; and that there ore no wetlands as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.02, Subd. 1 or public highways to be designated other than as shown. Craig W. Morse, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 23021 STA 7E OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this day of 20. by Craig W. Morse, Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 23021. By Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA This plat of STONEFIELD was approved and accepted by the City Council of Chanhassen, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 20. and is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. All monuments will be set as specified by the City Council and as stated this plat, according to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.02, Subd. 1. 01 Mayor CITY COUNCIL OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA M Clerk COUNTY SURVEYOR, Carver County, Minnesota Pursuant to Chapter 395, Minnesota Laws of 1971, this plat has been appr,.ved this COUNTY AUDITOR, Carver County, Minnesota day of John E. Freemyer, Carver County Surveyor 20 I hereby certify that there are no delinquent taxes for a// years prior to for land described on this plat and transfer entered. Dated this day of 20 By Mark Lundgren, Carver County Auditor COUNTY 7REASURER, Carver County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the taxes payable for the year 20 for land described on this plat as STONEFIELD have been paid on this day of . 20 COUNTY RECORDER, Carver County, Minnesota I hereby certify that this plot of STONEFIELD was filed this at o'clock .M. as Document No. us M Tom Kerber, Carver County Treasurer day of 20 Carl W. Hanson Jr., Carver County Recorder CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAR 0 1 2006 CHANHASM- PLANNING DEPT Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Sheet 1 of 3 sheets r&.rl i EWWR S TONEFIEL D CA DOC. NO. 40 0 40 80 120 \ J ; Scale in feet \V�\�J\ ° The West line of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County is �-` v `. Ary. 1 L_ `, assumed to bear N 00°0732" E. I -\J \ / �soa %\\ //11 3 y�i/_- �T (-/`'�-1)AV/ o Denotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron monument I J �\�� // b� j � L �l / `t /% X7/1 set and marked by License No. 23021 �<� rY \ k I �y0 // \\`I� Easement for Williams Pipeline , / I �4-/// �/� A / \ i( Company per Book 38, SATS., Pg. 490 �-// Denotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron monument � \` \ pry. 1 , ....N00°07 36 E 460.00.... found and marked as shown IV I \ < J ti 1 15._001 130.47 N I AA V OUMOTA 1 i 73.49 5698 N, I I 1 N0000736" 292.15 N I I1 1 139.28 62.64 60.22 N Drainage and Utility Easements are shown thus: 2 138 J \ 3O3?`7R�. . 04 I i I `:c Drainage &Utility I� 5 �<. J J N1 1017'53"W 9807 1 Easement (0 Drainage & Utility'S06-i �� ` L2.5.00 - o' -25.0 I(1 III 3 p� I III N�b 0 e 10 Easement x 2_ i_ Drainage & Utility 10Easement,0. 109- N 1.0.1 L 10 / / II I I (No Scale) Being 5 feet in width, unless otherwise indicated,�\ ky / o \ I 3 1 I aCO and adjoining lot lines, and 10 feet in width and ph \ �- I I / / 2 �' 3 adjoining right-of-way lines as shown on the plat. 3 0 00 3 'o \ \ I-25.0 �<1 �%B'02" i Easement& Utility \ \� \j10 j0 12 4 �1 L 02 Lk55.05 Q��3 �" )"'p I� \ Z\\ 94 \\ 2 0.. /. ��1 1 1 " 900 e I I I W p �1 i 9 5°52'05" L=28 1.19 R--35 _ �n / I V 0 5_00I Np2E / I 'S9"LI--35.00-- 1�8 15 5 ,'7-�\ V O d=9477'33"L=90.79 18%5'25" L=101.9.7 c lm 9k o\ / " 138.65 ( r- o I o U N N. line of the NW 1/4 \ C' �� \ / `[`I y \ \ / 16 \ qo 9, 33 L��j I ----! 25.00 ��28 )a �o - s3•• 1 N Z of the NW i/4 of Sec. 23 L / V�`\ ent \� p�2 / / I--25.0 I ' /� g "� �9 - B9 R�00.00 - �JlIC Q e p5e(0 30 / \ / I -20.00-1 { �'l ` 0p m N bti O 6 0\ / I \ \ o . / _9025"L_78o ° i a 60 ter, Drainage Utilit I l l f 4=7°48'43" L�5.90 , L=44.06 N00 06 14 E 150.39 \ yh' A \ oI' 1 Q1 13g O \ 9 ys-I 1 I l L1=4470'25" o \ �1� / \21 • � / 22 6 53 � ,o `o Easement I 1 � 1 / � I 38ay I/v op1� oV•^ \ N ^/ / / I I j Drainage & Utility / ry I ^O R Easement 2 \ ` 0 ryh o / \ \ 20.00-{ 1 1 4 ,� r�/ I //57 �N\lc,./ 6 I I o w I mo\Voa\ \\ \ \ 51 16=4 96'.. 6:..II1....••'• o -- -1I h// // `r�e;L=2622 600 oAt&NDot 3 _I I ' i i i i inae%/5�oo h L Sscm2500Esern"Ep 202.510 5°4950 °30llG` 45.29 3 V 106 64 J...... C'0 8 N05 95 73 >- N m \ \ \ tet: j I o 00 wn O o Val, � v Drainage & Utility \ �: mA\ - D 90✓ Drainage & U iht}� / , co - Easement Y1 ? I ` o Z rn Z,+ �� \ 6' / Easement I i / I S00 07'32"W \ o \\ \ oh\ 3 I io o `Drainage &Utility °j I o w _Found Iron Pipe h / I\ I 41.92 _ �o s 2 > 35.00 Easement I o \ ( LS 13057 \ I 1 / 73 '� o N ': m ` / 1 I o 15_00 i h / h `� 11 I NW. car. of the L > 30 30 o N 50 I i o -j / / �-Drainage &Utility-� o / NW 1/4 of the NW - 7j6 ) Easement �� o 114 of Sec. 23 239.08 30.84 30.62 \ \ 7 I _ _ - - 4.00 81.05 i 60.03 80.92 92.65 i 111.30 i 109.74 i N00007'321E 300.58 ----- �1-�' .130.75 535.67 75 l l r -n / A n l n n A l 1 1 i,-'----,, ) 04210'W 144. ..... N00007'32'E 2200.52 .... / I �7 I v/ -i / v L/ v/ -I F7 1 ,,- 7 L- . - NO CJ I n /. r- n l r- T � � I L=20.00 =--- `I J \ l \ l v 2 L-_ 1 330.001 / &=3°2819n R= i�- ll� I \-Found Iron Pipe I C.B.=N80°33'39'E I ') `> I Westwood Professional Services, Inc. ChocF `) of 3 chm}c S TONEFIEL D 40 0 40 80 120 Scale in feet -- ;/-�_ -- SE. COR. NW.--' -NE. COR. SW. 1/4 OF THE NW. I 1/4 OF THE NW. 1/4 SEC. 23 1/4 SEC. 23 0 m l A/ - F- ^ I ,- A A/ I l l/ / I A/ r_- ^ T /1 T -I I A Fl rl I -T- A I o f L_/ -I /\ L_ .� U .� /-1 / V F 7/ L_ L_ ._: V V L_ ..: l `r I1- 7 /-I LJ U l I I U l V ....N00°07'36"E 460.00.... 329.53 \ 90.38 90.38 �\ 32.47 -' ;\/4 \ 50.43 i It : 98.34 - I 3 w u� U) n it \ O \`- Drainage & Utility Easement �\ 3 rn O z , O i Z l/ V/ V %7/L_L_� ;z w N I i t I I m N \� �eF � I 4 i1 Z I V � _Drainage & Utility_ ---------------- 125-62 p3. i ' Ncroi I I I k115.24. n I \ Easement °0749"W m 115.2 rq 7 O E 10 Oki r J •...o a I I I ii N 202 190_ A �ph�O _Drainage &Utility ' n Easement 1 I I o ti o / I �N26o I I L I hti X33 :4 oop 9g o 10 --------------------------- n \moo -+ - - 375.00 ------------------------------- % I I I I �%��_ i W I I I ;A _ I1 I ____ I_ _ / �Q= I�� L 81.65 1\ i 4=20010'15"4 B5j \�' N O P\ 90.00 �` \2y 62 J N I 90.00 o II I ?o 90 is r � 2n�j8 C Z I o o N05_0831 W 275.1 I s' i °� �''•. 21 o W 15 �o � m�lw M too 0 1 51.33 4=16°27119" 90.00 s 4 00 0'25 R=630.00 90.00 10 10 q s \ o L�14.06 43.87 10 10\0 P ^ �i / < 1 j �i U- Drainage & Utility I I Drainage & Utility�j'I I m o Qui, \$ D I l i Easement Easement I I I 3 V rI/ N9 I j7562 o, 2� 12 "W�. 77.798 ^ N�°3i r �... m l 170 1p L N05°08'31" 0 88.651 I W f2�. VJ I °08'31'W 90.00 _t 10 00 J. -L N05 _- r N o \ i I L N05°08'31 "W 80. _ I l a 1 Easement ` romoge z I N m 2 cn m �\y 1 D \0 12 V i N � I co rn „„ IZ 'J I ? I �1III V� Drainage & Utility Easement 30 30 I 1 10 a rn �' `� 0 2 I Drainage & Utility - - - - o II -J `� z I" -.1r -Easement ,W W. line of the SW 1/4 of W. fine of the NW 1/4 � / o r•- ` l I ° o n N the NW 1/4 of Sec. 23 I r rat the NW 1/4 �� -/ J o M\ J M I i/ of Sec. 23 I I \\\�� o i l o a M "^� I /- 163.72 1 100.33 / _' 90.38 ! 90.38 l 80.16 ` / 131.02 3000 2 30.00 ! ! 4R 5: 716.00 ..... N00007'32"E 2200.52 .... A l F- 1 4 /1 r- ^ r -/-N I rj T- '1 7� L PLA T FILE NO. C.R. DOC. NOR Drainage and Utility Easements are shown thus: I I -J 5 I I~ 5 I I 10 10 I (No Scale) I Being 5 feet in width, unless otherwise indicated, and adjoining lot lines, and 10 feet in width and adjoining right-of-way lines as shown on the plat. The West line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County is assumed to bear N 0000732" E. o Denotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron monument set and marked by License No. 23021 • Denotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron monument found and marked as shown N00°0732"E 948.85 I Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Sheet 3 of 3 sheets C' \ V - � > fs� < (` W. LINE OF THE E. 290.75 FEET --� �\ OF 7HE THE W. 484.20 FEET SW. LIJ 1/4 OF THE NW. 1/4 SEC. 23 i \ 131 I LI II C � I r NW. CORNER OF THE E 290.75 - < -� 539.74 S00°0732"W 4- FEET OF THE THE W. 484.20 FEET 3 C SW. 1/4 OF THE NW. 1/4 SEC. 23 00 O \ Pfd I LIJ W W tility \ a L , J C� N00°0732"E 948.85 I Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Sheet 3 of 3 sheets Carver County GIS Mapping Application �1now- •R7 �ilfh� ::r�` / - •��rii �� • G� �lM 17 ��/l,�ti1► r��o Hap Cxvted by CanetCwNYs-G1S Le�eml Rand Tett us ngm ay, 14/Rglvays N cumMap Created on: Cwty Raads 10-21-2005 via. Carver Parts County A nal PI 290: This map was created using Carver County's Geographic Information Systems (GIS), it is a compilation of information and data from various City, County, State, and Federal offices. This map is not a surveyed or legally recorded map and is intended to be used as a reference. Carver County is L --j not responsible for any inaccuracies contained herein. My OF Date: October 21. 2005 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department By: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner Subject: STONEFIELD — Request for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A-2, to Single Family Residential, RSF; Subdivision review for 30 Lots, 1 Outlot and public right-of-way with Variances; on property located at 1601 Lyman Boulevard. Applicant: Plowshares Development, LLC. Planning Case: 05-37 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on October 14, 2005. The 60day review period ends December 13, 2005. - In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on November 15, 2005 at 7:00 p.m in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than November 4, 2005. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or Sprint(United) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco Zl � 1 1 Engineering -Surveying ;1 Landscape Architecture 1 lJ BillTo: City of Chanhassen Attention: Lori Haak 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Project: 05-144 P4-10 Regional Pond RECEIVED MAY 0 9 2007 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Manager: Charles Howley Professional Services for the Period: 04/01/2007 to 04/30/2007 Professional Services - Site Inspection of Culvert Technician IV Engineer III Professional Services Totals Invoice Invoice Number: 16142 Invoice Date: May 07, 2007 Net 30 Days 1.5% Interest per month on past due accounts. Contract Maximum: Previous Billings Against Maximum: Current Billings Against Maximum: Balance After This Invoice: Hours 3.00 0.50 Total Project Invoice Amount Total: $33,500.00 $24,413.00 $331.00 $8,756.00 Rate Amount 93.00 279.00 104.00 52.00 $331.00 00 $331.00 �(,✓ Aged Receivables: Current 31-60 Days 61-90 Days 91-120 Days > 120 Days $331.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Finance Charges will apply to past due balances. 7510 Market Place Drive . Eden Prairie, MN 55344 . 952-829-0700 . FAX 952-829-7806 Hansen Thorp Pellinen Olson, Inc. 4 CITY OF 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952 227.1180 Fax: 952.2271190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax 952227 1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952127.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952127.1400 Fax: 952227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952221.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Cerner Phone: 952227.1125 Fax: 952 227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us September 26, 2006 William Goers 1601 Lyman Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Review of Calculations from StonefieldlBC-P4.10 Regional Pond Dear Bill: Thank you for your letter of September 7, 2006 that outlined your concerns with the modeling that was completed by the City's consultant HTPO as they designed the regional ponding system near Power Hill Park. The City and HTPO have reviewed your letter and would like to take this opportunity to respond to your concerns. Generally, there are four points addressed by your letter. Below please find a summary of each point, as well as a brief response that combines HTPO's comments with the City's perspective. 1. Concern: Calculations/Modeling The calculations and modeling appear solid. Shorter concentration times could have been used. Response: Noted. Because times of concentration of 60 minutes were used in both the pre and post -ponding scenarios, the model will still show the same relative reductions in peak runoff rates.. 2. Concern: Predevelopment Conditions The calculations did not compare proposed conditions to predevelopment conditions. The ponding that was existing on-site prior to the BC -P4.10 project caused some serious erosion issues. Response: The upstream development (Lake Susan Hills) was required to meet the City's water quality and water quantity standards. It was designed to meet preexisting runoff rates. Because the upstream development was required to provide rate control to meet preexisting runoff rates, modeling predevelopment rates at this time is unnecessary. The majority of the erosion issues downstream from the preexisting ponding were a result of the failing outlet structure and headcutting, exacerbated by the preexisting drain tile. 3. Concern: Sharp Peak in Hydrograph The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Bill Goers September 26, 2006 Page 2 of 3 The modeling results show significant, short -duration spikes in runoff rates. Additionally, it appears that the ponding has cut off the low flow conditions that existed prior to the most recent regional ponding project. Prior to any upstream development being proposed, the Carver Soil and Water Conservation District suggested a 12" pipe as an outlet for the check dam system that was recommended to control rate from the regional ponds upstream. The current outlets of the system are larger than 12". Response: Runoff hydrographs typically are depicted in a fashion that shows a sudden increase and a sudden decrease in runoff. It is an anomaly that results as part of the modeling process. It does not necessarily reflect actual discharge conditions, but rather the highest rate of discharge. The reason for the absence of low flows is not due to the regional ponding system, but rather because the drain tiles that collected groundwater from the low, farmed areas were removed in conjunction with the BC -P4.10 project and the Stonefield development. The 12" outlet that was recommended by the SWCD was not incorporated into approved plans. Those plans also included a 3.4' increase in the height of the berm, which would not have been feasible due to constraints in the width of that ponding area. The regional ponding scenario that was designed and built is adequate to reduce peak runoff rates from 99.1 cubic feet per second in the post -development, functioning outlet structure scenario to 72.2 cubic feet per second in the current scenario. The downstream reduction in rate should appear even greater since the failure of the outlet structure would have resulted in peak discharges greater than 99.1 cubic feet per second. 4. Concern: Unarmored Creek Bed The narrower, existing creek bed may experience erosion due to the width of the flow path tributary to it. Response: The creek, as a natural drainageway in a shaded area, is eroding in the present condition and has always experienced some erosion. Because the runoff rates are controlled by upstream ponding and further mitigated by the rock check dams, the upstream improvements will not increase the threat of erosion. Any erosion down -gradient of the new north property line is the responsibility of the property owner. The Carver Soil and Water Conservation District provides technical, and sometimes financial, assistance to individual property owners experiencing erosion on their properties. Please contact District Manager Mike Wanous at 952.442.5101 for more information. (� Bill Goers September 26, 2006 Page 3 of 3 Please feel free to contact me at 952.227.1135 or lhaak@ci.chanhassen.mn.us if you have additional questions. Regards, CITY O,F, C'cH}ANHHASSEENN Zlon Haak Water Resources Coordinator cc: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Charlie Howley, HTPO July 10, 2006 Re: Stonefield, April Storm File 2005 -1114 -CO Dear Lori: X JUL 12 2006 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Westwood Professional Services 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, AIN 553" MAIN 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5822 Fall III 1-888-937-5150 EMAIL wps®westtEvoodpsoom .viesteroodps.cam I reviewed the site conditions in regards to storm attenuation (volume of storm water storage available) just prior to the April storm event and compared it to the ultimate proposed conditions. In the ultimate design conditions, ponds P4.IOb & c will have combined attenuation storage of 8.0± acre -ft and two 30" culverts for an outlet. During the construction conditions of early April pond P4.1 Ob had not been expanded and pond P4.10c had not been constructed. However, a temporary basin with a stabilized overflow and outlet structure was in place along with a large borrow pit located upstream of the temporary pond. During the early April storm event the discharge from the existing outlet of pond P4.1 Ob was conveyed to the temporary basin and the borrow pit was at such a location that the discharge from the borrow pit was controlled by the temporary basin. The combined storage of the temporary basin, borrow pit and Pond P4. l Ob is estimated to be 13.5± Acre -ft. The site discharge and offsite drainage was controlled by the temporary outlet consisting of a rock riser and a 12" outlet pipe. Due to the fact that the temporary basin was correctly installed with a 12" outlet and the offsite water from Pond P4.1 Ob was being conveyed to the temporary pond in conjunction with the borrow pit, It is my opinion that the storm water was in fact reduced in peak discharge to less than the ultimate design would have been during the early April storm. I have attached a picture of the temporary outlet taken shortly after the storm event. If you have any questions, or would like to discuss this matter in more detail feel free to give me a call. TWIN CITIESWETRO 51 CLOUD BRAINERD Lori Haak Water Resources Coordinator City of Chanhassen yd 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Stonefield, April Storm File 2005 -1114 -CO Dear Lori: X JUL 12 2006 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Westwood Professional Services 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, AIN 553" MAIN 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5822 Fall III 1-888-937-5150 EMAIL wps®westtEvoodpsoom .viesteroodps.cam I reviewed the site conditions in regards to storm attenuation (volume of storm water storage available) just prior to the April storm event and compared it to the ultimate proposed conditions. In the ultimate design conditions, ponds P4.IOb & c will have combined attenuation storage of 8.0± acre -ft and two 30" culverts for an outlet. During the construction conditions of early April pond P4.1 Ob had not been expanded and pond P4.10c had not been constructed. However, a temporary basin with a stabilized overflow and outlet structure was in place along with a large borrow pit located upstream of the temporary pond. During the early April storm event the discharge from the existing outlet of pond P4.1 Ob was conveyed to the temporary basin and the borrow pit was at such a location that the discharge from the borrow pit was controlled by the temporary basin. The combined storage of the temporary basin, borrow pit and Pond P4. l Ob is estimated to be 13.5± Acre -ft. The site discharge and offsite drainage was controlled by the temporary outlet consisting of a rock riser and a 12" outlet pipe. Due to the fact that the temporary basin was correctly installed with a 12" outlet and the offsite water from Pond P4.1 Ob was being conveyed to the temporary pond in conjunction with the borrow pit, It is my opinion that the storm water was in fact reduced in peak discharge to less than the ultimate design would have been during the early April storm. I have attached a picture of the temporary outlet taken shortly after the storm event. If you have any questions, or would like to discuss this matter in more detail feel free to give me a call. TWIN CITIESWETRO 51 CLOUD BRAINERD -G: July 10, 2006 Page 2 ". Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Westwood WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Curtis Neft, PE Project Engineer planning > engineering > surveying a . � • .{. r t � � _ t in. �.Y �+ y �'eF S �{ � -l� •� �.��% � E .wn•�."1 ^' r �Y` yl�_' . w_ l" N 3 f. t i r• a r • +�"s •�,4�s J �"` 31�-4 �r 1pl: s y�". •^ ll��f.'ri•i f '�- ,�� 4'� i' t• -t, w ^ se.- r.l'� _ •vf•`1 �. r. �'Y�� :!` `*� .i \I��x,t .tQ_. ♦ ,. 'R��1 l '��' � J .a 44, lto �p a ,.. .3 Y . t � � '� ' .., .tti�•��y- q1�,, Y � r • .w- a �t ..s I� .''^se'r E tiTC ` >C � 4 F rr Y �!�^ • y • � .Ls'S _ , 1 ,. .. .S{:• fry . 4? • .yam• •. 4 ice• �Y� r �r / fdp'y�,r �' �•` r �. •F� 3> �,wr•;Ok... .r.�,_� r _s �nCZ', �r ;/� ♦ � ! I `yY Y' ' �% ' � w � \. �F� � "'F WY1 � � .(.) ! r' / r� ={ sex 'L J f� I yy w✓ f6�'Jdn .sem �/{;- ; - • .�. .' .�`�� Y'- � ! _ ., r.. 'js� r ir, y-. r. CITY OF 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952 2271110 Building Inspections Phone: 952,227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Part A Recreation Phone: 952227.1120 Fac 952.227.1110 Recreation Cenbx 2310 Cougar Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952227.1404 Planning d Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fac 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Ceder Phone: 952727.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site wwwAchanhassen.nm.us MEMORANDUM TO: Paul Oehme, City Engineer/Dir. of Public Works Vr CD. FROM: Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer t3 DATE: June 26, 2006 SUBJ: Approve Addendum to Stonefield Development Contract Project No. 06-07 The developer of Stonefield will be installing storm sewer that is designed to convey post -development runoff from the property to the west. The cost to oversize the storm sewer is e '�mbursement.through the Storm Water 8Fund. The oversizing co s ,8.2an s based 6fthe con ct is bid price. -72049 When the property to the west is final platted, the d r will reimburse the City $8,868.26 for the storm sewer oversizing costs; ;i i� Staff Attachment: 4.44 4B I P =ax.^ t. s xim`s... �0 . "tt /fir The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A geat place to live, work, and play. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ADDENDUM "A" TO STONEFIELD DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT SPECIAL PROVISIONS AGREEMENT 2006, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT, INC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Developer"). 1. BACKGROUND. The City and Developer entered into a development contract for the STONEF' ELL plat dated April 10, 2006, recorded May 17, 2006 as Document No. A441353 with the Carver County Recorder's office (the "Development Contract"). The Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect as specifically modified by this Addendum. 2. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. In addition to the terms and conditions outlined in paragraph 8 of the development contract, the following special condition shall apply to Stonefreld: A. The City will reimburse the Developer $8,868.26 for storm sewer oversizing. 125s4ovol SRN:06/15l2006 3. RECORDING. The Development Contract and this Addendum "A" shall be recorded against all lots, blocks, and outlots in Stonefield. IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Addendum "A" was executed by the parties the day and year first above written. (SEAL) CITY OF CHANHASSEN M Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Todd Gerhardt, City Manager PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT, LLC "W Todd M. Simning, President 125840v01 2 SRN:061152006 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2006, by Thomas A. Furlong and by Todd Gerhardt, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2006, by Todd Simning, the Chief Manager of Ploweshares Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public O UY 1 . Campbell Knutson, P.A. 317 Eagandale Office Cneter 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 SRN 125840vol SRN:06/152006 Unit Total Description Unit Quantity Price Price STORM SEWER (With Future) 21" RC Pipe, Class TV (all depths) L.F. 220 $30.25 $6,655.00 24" RC Pipe, Class III (all depths) L.F. 325 $32.50 $10,562.50 30" RC Pipe, Class III (all depths) L.F. 65 $47.50 $3,087.50 42" RC Pipe, Class III (all depths) L.F. 185 $92.00 $17,020.00 48" Diameter CBMH/STMH (0-8' Depth) EACH 3 $1,750.00 $5,250.00 54" Diameter CBMH/STMH (0-8' Depth) EACH 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 66" Diameter CBMH/STMH (0-8' Depth) EACH 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 72" Diameter CBMH/STMH (0-8' Depth) EACH 1 $3,200.00 $3,200.00 Extra Depth 72" Diameter Manhole V.F. 3.5 $150.00 $525.00 42" RC Flared End Section w/frash guard EACH 1 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 Class 3 Rip Rap (Type Limestone, incl. filter fabric) C.Y. 30.5 $90.00 $2,745.00 Granular Filter Material C.Y. 15 $12.00 $180.00 Subtotal Storm Sewer STORM SEWER (Without Future) 18" RC Pipe, Class V (all depths) 21" RC Pipe, Class IV (all depths) 24" RC Pipe, Class III (all depths) 36" RC Pipe, Class III (all depths) 48" Diameter CBMH/STMH (0.8' Depth) 60" Diameter CBMH/STMH (0-8' Depth) 66" Diameter CBMH/STMH (0-8' Depth) Extra Depth 66" Diameter Manhole 36" RC Flared End Section w/frash guard Class 3 Rip Rap (Type Limestone, incl. filter fabric) Granular Filter Material Subtotal Storm Sewer Net Upsizing Costs $57,125.00 L.F. 220 $27.50 $6,050.00 L.F. 325 $30.25 $9,831.25 L.F. 65 $32.50 $2,112.50 L.F. 185 $68.00 $12,580.00 EACH 4 $1,750.00 $7,000.00 EACH 1 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 EACH 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 V.F. 3.5 $78.57 $275.00 EACH 1 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 C.Y. 23 $90.00 $2,070.00 C.Y. 11.5 $12.00 $138.00 Page 1 $48,256.75 $8,868.26 �f.lJ:oul ruf<i�,_ Sho. n in /fed. R p Stonefield�Overau F".`ii=:�T Plowshares Develo ment, Inc. ,, i �% Unit Total Description Unit Quantity Price Price STORM SEWER (With Future) 21" RC Pipe, Class IV (all depths) L.F. 220 $30.25 $6,655.00 24" RC Pipe, Class III (all depths) L.F. 325 $32.50 $10,562.50 30" RC Pipe, Class III (all depths) L.F. 65 $47.50 $3,087.50 42" RC Pipe, Class III (all depths) L.F. 185 $92.00 $17,020.00 48" Diameter CBMH/STMH (0-8' Depth) EACH 3 $1,750.00 $5,250.00 54" Diameter CBMH/STMH (0-8' Depth) EACH 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 66" Diameter CBMH/STMH (0-8' Depth) EACH 1 $3,000.00 53,000.00 72" Diameter CBMH/STMH (0-8' Depth) EACH 1 $3,200.00 $3,200.00 Extra Depth 72" Diameter Manhole V.F. 3.5 $150.00 $525.00 42" RC Flared End Section w/Trash guard EACH 1 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 Class 3 Rip Rap (Type Limestone, incl. filter fabric) C.Y. 30.5 $90.00 $2,745.00 Granular Filter Material C.Y. 15 $12.00 $180.00 Subtotal Storm Sewer $57,125.00 STORM SEWER (Without Future) 18" RC Pipe, Class V (all depths) L.F. 220 $27.50 $6,050.00 21" RC Pipe, Class IV (all depths) L.F. 325 $30.25 $9,831.25 24" RC Pipe, Class III (all depths) L.F. 65 $32.50 $2,112.50 36" RC Pipe, Class III (all depths) L.F. 185 $68.00 $12,580.00 48" Diameter CBMH/STMH (0-8' Depth) EACH 4 $1,750.00 $7,000.00 60" Diameter CBMH/STMH (0-8' Depth) EACH 1 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 66" Diameter CBMH/STMH (0-8' Depth) EACH 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 Extra Depth 66" Diameter Manhole V.F. 3.5 $78.57 $275.00 36" RC Flared End Section wiTrash guard EACH 1 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 Class 3 Rip Rap (Type Limestone, incl. filter fabric) C.Y. 23 $90.00 $2,070.00 Granular Filter Material C.Y. 11.5 $12.00 $138.00 Subtotal Storm Sewer $48,256.75 Net Upsizing Costs $8,868.26 Page 1 W-6001 rcait.te. shown .n R12a, - ../ - 1 . 2 ` �' P Stonefield R_t Plowshazes ]Development, Inc. Engineering May 17, 2006 CITY OF the failure of the culvert: CIIANIIASSEN William and Vicky Goers Fax: 952.227.1110 1601 Lyman Boulevard 7700 Markel Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 PO Bax 147 On April 6, 2006, the City of Chanhassen received approximately 1.28 inches of Chanhassen, MN 55317 driveway slopes back were not sufficient to keep water from piping Fax 952.227.1310 Nathan Franzen Administration Plowshares Development, LLC PFax:952..27.11100 Fax 952.227.1110 1851 Lake Drive West Fax: 952.227.1110 Suite 550 Building Inspections Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: 952.227.1180 the driveway culvert. Fax: 952.227.1190 culvert also may have contributed to piping of water along the sides of the Engineering Re: Failure and Replacement of Driveway Culvert at 1601 Lyman Boulevard Phone: 952.227.11 60 the failure of the culvert: Fax: 952.227.1170 Fax: 952.227.1110 Dear Bill, Vicky and Nathan: Finance installed. When the sediment was removed from the downstream end, the Phone: 952.227.1140 On April 6, 2006, the City of Chanhassen received approximately 1.28 inches of Fax: 952 227.1110 driveway slopes back were not sufficient to keep water from piping Fax 952.227.1310 rain. As a result of this rain, the culvert at the above address, which carries runoff Pads & Recreation from the upstream watershed (including the Stonefield development), was Phone: 952.227.1120 undermined. The undermining of the culvert caused a portion of the driveway to Fax: 952.227.1110 wash out, making the home at the above address inaccessible. In addition, the Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard drainageway experienced significant erosion both upstream and downstream of Phone: 952.227.1400 the driveway culvert. Fax: 952.227.1404 culvert also may have contributed to piping of water along the sides of the The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. In the opinion of the City, there were three significant factors that contributed to Planning a Natural Resources the failure of the culvert: Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 1. The culvert under the driveway was an old culvert that was not properly Public Works installed. When the sediment was removed from the downstream end, the 1591 Park Road material around the culvert and the wooden wing walls holding the Phone: 952.227.1300 driveway slopes back were not sufficient to keep water from piping Fax 952.227.1310 around the culvert and eventually compromising the integrity of the Senior Center driveway surface. Phone: 952.227.1125 2. The drainageway downstream of the culvert was cleaned by the City's Fax: 952.227.1110 contractor in the Fall of 2005. The disturbed areas were not stable on web SRO April 6 and therefore were not suitable to convey the amount of runoff www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us coming from upstream. The lack of sediment near the bottom of the culvert also may have contributed to piping of water along the sides of the culvert. 3. The development taking place upstream of the culvert (Stonefreld) had not yet constructed, expanded or maintained the storm water ponds necessary to manage the nearly 100 acres that flowed through the drainageway. The The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. runoff was diverted into a temporary sediment basin; however, the basin was only sized to accommodate runoff from 5.5 acres. The overloaded capacity of the temporary sediment basin is evident in the photographs taken by City staff on April 7 that show a significant amount of sediment being transported to the Goers culvert. There may have also been some debris that blocked the culvert during the storm, causing water to back up upstream of the culvert. This would have contributed to the bank sloughing that occurred upstream of the driveway culvert. On April 7, 2006, City crews temporarily repaired the driveway so that the Goers would have the use of their driveway; however, this fix is inadequate. The City received a quote from Kusske Construction for the replacement of the existing culvert with a 48" culvert with flared end sections, the stabilization of the downstream end of the culvert with rip rap, the stabilization of the upstream and downstream channel areas with blanket and seed, the removal of soil chunks upstream of the culvert, final grading and stabilization of the site and blactopping the driveway as needed. The cost for this work is estimated to be $15,000. The City is proposing a 33.3% cost share between the City, the Goers and Plowshares to remedy this situation. Please submit a check for $5,000 to the City at your earliest convenience so the work can begin as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please contact me at 952.227.1135. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, CITY OF CHANHASSEN Lori Haak Water Resources Coordinator SWMP FEE WORKSHEET DATE March 17, 2006 PLANNING CASE 05-37 PROJECT Stonefield Site Area in Acres 17.63 Outlot A (Pond) (1.32) Assessable area 16.31 ZONING CLASSIFICATION WATER QUALITY 1Y/.VYDI&41smzY11B1 FEES Low Density Residential Rate per Acre Acres Total $ 1,600.00 16.31 $ 26,096.00 Rate per Acre Acres Total ;y ;7�1t]YAy $ 2,900.00 16.31 $ 47,299.00 ITEM UNIT QUANTITY 50% UNIT TOTAL PRICE Storm water pond acre 17.62 0.5 $ 1,600.00 $14,096.00 Outlet structure each 0 $ 2,500.00 $ - $ 14,096.00 SWMP FEE $ 73,395.00 SWMP CREDrFS $ 14,096.00 TOTAL SWMP FEE I $ 59,299.00 March 16, 2006 Mak Sweidan Engineer City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Stonefield File 2005 -1114 -CO Dear Mr. Sweidan: The following is a list of response comments to the draft DC and the Administration Fees: If a response is not given for an item it is assumed that we are in agreement. PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT, INC. is misspelled and misrepresented as a limited liability company. Plowshares Development, Inc. is a Minnesota corporation. Under Special Provisions, item 5, the completion date for all improvements should be modified to allow for the placement of wear course by August 1, 2007. Good point - we'll have to talk to Paul about modifying this so that everything EXCEPT the wear course must be installed by Nov. Under Item 6, the engineering, surveying, and inspection fees are 56,000. a total cost of public improvements and security should be updated accordm y. This security should be 7% of public improvements. $967,738.06 x 0.07 = $67,741.66 (Mak- please verify that my calculations are correct). This number is higher than Nathan's estimate because we collect security for payment of our inspectors. 7% is standard. Under Item 7, Plowshares is misspelled. CA S9. Under Item 8 Zq9 A, #2, by our calculations the SWMP f $`49;EE3. Please confirm. I will check on this and get back to you. Under Item 8, A, #4, it should be clearly written that the connection charges will be paid by the builder. "Lateral sanitary sewer and water connection charges are paid at building permit issuance. " Good point. We should draft some language to that effect and get Roger to look at. V March 17, 2006 Page 2 Under Item 8, A #6, Please provide us with information detailing what collector roadway our project is impacting and what specific improvement our fees are going to be used for. Under Item 8, G, #2, this requirement should be removed. The temporary cul-de-sac will become a high point when the property to the west develops hindering a stub at this location unwarranted. Under Item 8, G #4, due to the already existing hardship to Lot 4 from the 20' easement setback, Plowshares Development, Inc. does not wish to have a storm sewer in this location along with a utility easement. The 20' setback is for structures only and this space will be occupied with landscaping and a driveway (this was verified with staff prior to the adoption of the setback ordinance). We feel the current location of the storm sewer between lots 3 & 4 is adequate and provides access for future maintenance. Under Item 8, H, #2, Westwood Professional Services, Inc. would like the City of Chanhassen to review there policy on storm sewer within a roadway and consider using the MnDOT Concrete Pipe Load Tables. The use of Class 5 for shallow storm sewer within a residential roadway is not warranted for storm sewer larger than 18". This change would have to be in our Standard Specs and detail plates, which we've just finished updating. We'd need to talk with Paul about the logistics of changing our spec this late in the game, or approving something that doesn't meet our current spec. Under Item 8, O, The sign at the end of the cul-de-sac should state that the cul-de-sac is temporary and the roadway will be extended in the future. Under Item 8, R, #1, Wetland D has been removed by the City of Chanhassen. We request that all signage, buffer and setback requirements be removed. Ze,1, Se+h r cc A4;4ra,, 4414 + Thi��ndition should hP - - -- Under Item 8, R, #2, this requirement should be removed. This structure will be removed with the construction of the new pond system and Item 8, T, #8 states "In the event that the regional pond project is not constructed, the applicant has proposed the installation of a second outlet structure to Pond A. In that event, the existing outlet structure that is failing must also be replaced. The cost of a new outlet structure to replace the existing failing structure would be borne by the City, but the replacement would be done by the applicant." few C vJ, �,� • F There appears to be some confusion here. Item 8, R, #2 should bevemened sine th e wetland will be impacted under a deminimis exemption from the Wetland Conservation Act. Item 8, R, #3 should also be removed because it is redundant. March 17, 2006 Page 3 Under Item, 8, R, #5, this requirement should be revised. Silt fence should not be placed around Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. The area adjacent to block 1 is up gradient and would not benefit from the installation of silt fence. On the contrary, silt fence would channel any water coming from the adjacent properties and cause additional erosion. We propose boundary staking be placed to depict the property boundary. Also, a temporary inlet with sediment control is proposed on the current SWPPP. This is fine. Z"� wt Under Item 8, T, #2, this item sho be removed because there are no existing structures on site. Under Item 8, T, #5, this it hould be removed because there are not existing wells oVL or on-site sewage trea systems. 0� Under Item 8, T, #10, this item should be revised to allow a closure starting May 1, 2006. Plowshares Development is willing to conduct a neighborhood meeting; however, we do not feel it is justified as we have already had a neighborhood meeting in which we informed the residents that the road would be closed for a period of time. It would be our preference to send out a detailed mailing to all residents within 500' reminding them of the road closure. Paul needs to okay this. Please contact me if you have any questions. �f,/ 6N 4%C( Gl�y Sincerely, 1� ��' 5 wtw WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Curtis NeB, PE Project Engineer PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT, INC. Nathan Franzen Project Manager :-:5�6ne-G,e (1 F�,?al Play- /L�C- 1�� 43 mak (311,/06) �ed o�'o„ �b 1 N3,000iD56, 00D o l Zn r� CS -1,�relj9 kvo 4- ,-a� SwMP ices �59,2�9 W,(( too e baru- ",(. C61"1- 300' 61"1 300' � ;� l�efwe�� CEs p1-pfeA- y I: ate, W�I.300 C70 AGREEMENT FOR STORM WATER FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS 2006, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Minnesota corporation (the "Developer"). Statement of Facts A. The city has conditionally approved a preliminary plat for Stonefield (the "plat"). Developer is in the process of seeking final plat approval. The land being platted is legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" and is hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property". This Agreement is entered into pursuant to M.S. 462.358. B. The City currently operates and maintains (i) two storm water ponds on a 122936v05 RN%:toM 2006 parcel of real property adjacent to the Subject Property (the "On -Site Ponds") (a site plan showing the existing On -Site Ponds is attached as Exhibit `B"), and (ii) one storm water pond on a parcel of real property several blocks away from the Subject Property (the "North Pond") (a site plan showing the existing North Pond is attached as Exhibit "C'). The CHAMSroNEFrELn (Plowshares Development, LLC) On -Site Ponds and North Pond shall collectively be defined as the "Ponds". C. The City has determined that: (i) the existing On -Site Ponds need to be dredged and improved; and (ii) the North Pond needs to be dredged, as soon as possible. The City has also determined that a shared pond in the approximate location of the On -Site Ponds and partially located on the Subject Property will effectively serve the City's and Stonefield's stone water retention needs. D. To that end, the City has caused certain storm water retention pond improvement plans to be prepared for the On -Site Ponds. Such plans have been incorporated with the plans for Stonefield and the resulting site plan is attached hereto as Exhibit "D". E. In order to complete the grading of Stonefield and the On -Site Ponds improvements in a cost effective and timely manner, Developer has agreed to perform the Pond improvements and dredging in conjunction with its grading of Stonefield, and City has agreed to reimburse Developer for engineering and survey expenses ("Expenses") not to exceed $9,750, plus construction costs, incurred by Developer, as follows: (i) 87.7% of the On -Site Ponds improvement costs and Expenses, and (ii) 100% of the North Pond dredging costs and Expenses. Now therefore, in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged the parties hereto agree as follows: 122936v05 2 CHAMSroNEt7ELo RNK:`02/21/2006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) Early Grading/Improvement Approval. The City hereby authorizes entry onto the City's property by Developer and its contractors to construct the storm water facilities improvements contemplated herein (i) within Stonefield, (ii) within the City's adjacent land, and (iii) within the City's land upon which the North Pond is located, to complete the improvements and dredging contemplated in this agreement, in conjunction with the early grading of Stonefield, prior to final plat approval of Stonefield; provided that the Developer enter into this Agreement, abide by its terms, and furnish the security required by it. 2. Plans. The storm water facilities shall be constructed by the Developer on the Subject Property and adjacent property in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Agreement. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Agreement, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A - Grading and Erosion Control Plan Plan B - Plans and Specifications for Storm Water Facilities to be furnished by the City No work can occur outside of the areas indicated on the plans without modifying this Agreement or obtaining a separate grading permit. Prior to commencing work, the Developer must submit a bid(s) for such work to the city for city approval. 3. Erosion Control. Prior to initiating site grading, erosion control shall be implemented by the Developer according to the grading, drainage, and erosion control plan A and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded as soon as weather permits. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Transportation's seeding specification to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be 122936v05 3 CHAN:STONERFLo RNK:i02/21/2006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City shall (except in emergencies) notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten (10) days, the City may draw down the letter of credit to pay any costs. The cost allocation set forth in paragraph 10(D) shall apply to the requirements of this paragraph. 4. Term. The storm water facilities improvements to the On -Site Ponds must be constructed and completed between March 1, 2006 and April 1, 2006. The dredging of the North Pond must be completed between March 1, 2006 and June 15, 2006. Both of the foregoing deadlines are subject to extensions caused by the City and other force majeure events and matters beyond Developer's control 5. Clean up. The Developer shall promptly clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. City Engineering Administration and Construction Observation. Subject to cost allocation and reimbursement as contemplated in Section 10(D) below, the Developer shall pay a fee for in-house engineering administration. City engineering administration will include monitoring of construction, observation and consultation with Developer and Developer's engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, project monitoring during the warranty period, and processing of requests for reduction in security. Fees for this service shall be approximately $10,637, which is three percent (3%) of the estimated construction costs. The Developer shall pay 12.3% of this fee in cash at the time of approval of 12293605 4 CHAN:STorEFteLo RNK:r02/21/2006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) this Agreement. Subject to cost allocation and reimbursement pursuant to Section 10(D) below, the Developer shall pay for construction observation performed by the City's in-house engineering staff or consulting engineer. Construction observation shall include part or full time inspection of proposed public utilities and will be billed on hourly rates estimated to be seven percent (7%) of the construction costs, such fee shall be subject to cost allocation and reimbursement pursuant to Section 10(D) below. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, the Developer shall famish the City with a cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit, in the form attached hereto, from Developer's bank (Lakeland Construction Finance, LLC) ("security") for approximately $43,613, which is 12.3% of the estimated project cost. The City may draw down the security, with 3 business days advance notice, for any violation of the terms of this Contract or if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the completion of the On -Site Ponds improvement work. If the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to pay Developer's share of the cost to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof reasonably satisfactory to the City that (i) On -Site Ponds improvement work has been completed, (ii) financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, (iii) the required "as constructed" plans have been received by the City, (iv) a one year warranty security is provided, and (v) the public improvements are accepted by the City Council (which acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), the security shall be released to Developer. The City standard specifications for utilities and street construction outline procedures for security reductions. In addition, to guarantee completion of the additional grading of the Subject Property (not related to the On -Site Ponds), Developer shall furnish City with a cash escrow or 122936vO5 Cj CHAN:STONEFIELD RNK:t02/21/2006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) irrevocable letter of credit in the form attached hereto, from a bank (the "additional security") for $Z"1320•61an amount equivalent to 110% of estimated cost of such additional grading. With City approval (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), the additional security may be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (901/6) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the amounts certified by Developer's engineer shall be retained by City until all of the additional grading has been completed. 8. Insurance. During the period that such work is being performed, the Developer shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to construction of the public improvements. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given thirty (30) days advance written notice of any changes to or the cancellation of the insurance. The certificate may not contain any disclaimer for failure to give the required notice. 9. Acknowledgement. Although this Agreement is entered into pursuant to M.S. 462.358, the Developer acknowledges that approval of the work under this Agreement does not constitute a guarantee by the City of any future subdivision approvals and that, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Developer performs the work on the Subject Property at its own risk. 122936v05 6 CHAN:SToNEFmp RNK:ro2/212006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) 10. Responsibility for Costs. A. Subject to cost allocation and reimbursement pursuant to Section 10(D) below, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the work to be performed hereunder, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of this Agreement, the preparation of this Agreement, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting the grading and erosion control. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from Developer's or its contractors' negligence or willful misconduct and for work done in conjunction with this Agreement which is not in compliance with the approved Plans (as amended). The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorney's fees. C. The defaulting party shall reimburse the non -defaulting party for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Agreement, including engineering and attorney's fees. D. The City will reimburse the Developer for: (i) 87.7% of the cost of constructing the On -Site Ponds storm water facilities and improvement; and (ii) 100% of the cost of dredging the North Pond. The Developer shall provide the City with an itemized billing. The Developer shall be solely responsible for any grading performed within the Subject Property that is not required in connection the On -Site Ponds improvements. E. The City shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the Developer for obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If such amount is 12293605 7 CHAN:SroNFFiFLD RNK-r02/21/2006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) not paid in full within such 30 day period, interest shall accrue at the rate of 10% per annum on any overdue amounts, until paid in full with interest. F. The Developer and the Developer's engineer shall have no liability or responsibility for the design of the storm water facilities, and once the work contemplated herein is completed and as -built plans are approved by the City, Developer shall have no liability or responsibility (except for its construction warranty contemplated in Section 7 above) for or in connection with the storm water facilities. 11. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for 12.3% of any expense so incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than 48 hours in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a court order for permission to enter the land. (SEAL) CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: AND odd Gerhardt, City Manager/Clerk DEVELOPER: PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT, INC. BY: Its: President 122936v05 8 CHAN:STONMELD RNK:102/21/2006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this .3M1, -day of / , 2006, by Thomas A. Furlong and by Todd Gerhardt, respectively the Mayor and City Manager/Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority gran(ed by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) 1VORE'".491M, nt EN J. EN6ELHARDT ry Public -Minnesota ( ss. mlealon Ezplre, Jin 31, 2010 COUNTY OFCQ,rY�GY ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this � day of jA&rc-tom , 2006, by Todd M. Simning, the President of Plowshares Development, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. IQIISTAIIAAIENOVAGt %g��, II., f tpTAflYRJBUC-ttPAlACK G(, 1n cwa�s�a+owtslatznm NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNuTsoN Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 RNK 1060555.2 122936v05 g CHAN:STONEFlEtn RNKA2/21/2006 (Plowshares Developmrnt, LLC) EXHIBIT "A" Leeal Description of Subiect Property 122936v05 10 CHANSTONEFlELD RNKc102/21/2006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) Site Plan of Eaistine On -Site Ponds 122936x05 11 CHAN:SroNmELD RNKr02/21/2006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) EXHIBIT "C" Site Plan of Existing North Pond 122936v05 12 CHANSTONEFIRD RNK:t02/21/2006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) s♦ l_�. i I Site Plan of Stonefield and New On -Site Ponds 122936vO5 13 CHANSroNmuD RNK:rO2/21/2006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. _ Date: TO: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. dated 2006, of (Name of Bank) b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Manager of the City of Chanhassen; c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2 ; and d) Certify that notice was provided to (Name of Developer) as required under that certain Agreement for Storm Water Facilities Improvements dated 2006, or that such notice was not required thereunder. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Chanhassen City Manager that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Chanhassen City Manager, Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 317, Chanhassen, MN 55317, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 500. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. Am Its 122936x05 14 CHAN:SToNe.F1rLD RNK:f02/212006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) :rom:H.T.P.O. INC. p Engineering -Surveying 1 Landscape Architecture t �1 12/09/2005 11:42 #035 P.001/002 FAX COVER SHEET bate: December 9, 2005 To: Lori Haak Company: City of Chanhassen From: Charlie Howley Re: P4.10 Regional Pond Number of Pages (Including Cover Sheet). Comments: Here You go Lorl. Copy: 7510 Market Place Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952-828-0700 Fax: 952.829.7806 Project No.: 05-144 Fax No: 952.227.1935 Phone No.: Fax No: 952 829,7806 Phone No.: 952.829.0700 F, Signed: Charlie Howley �'rom:H.T.P.O. INC. 952 829 7806 12/09/2005 11:42 #035 P.002/002 =n 0 0 N 0 w x N N / 0 L i a w 3 Ld w 0 0 0 M U W 0 o- 0 Z a i 02005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. I?rell0 for • Stonefi*eld Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared for: Plowshares Development, Inc. 1851 Lake Drive West Chanhassen, Minnesota Contact: Nathan Franzen Phone: 952-361-0832 Fax 952-361-0833 Prepared by: 55317 . Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952-937.5150 Fax- 952-937-5822 Project Number: 20051114.00 Contact: Curtis R. Neft, PE Vicinity Map (Not to Sccle) NO DATE INDEX SHEETS SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION Revised Per City Comments (CRN) 1 COVER 11/15/05 Revised Per City Comments (WRW) 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT 4 PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 5 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 6 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN AND DETAILS 7 PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 8 PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 9 PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION INVENTORY PLAN 10 PRELIMINARY STREET PROFILES 11 PRELIMINARY TYPICAL SECTION & DETAILS Vicinity Map (Not to Sccle) NO DATE REVISION SHEETS 1 10/20/05 Revised Per City Comments (CRN) 1, 3 & 4 2 11/15/05 Revised Per City Comments (WRW) ALL CITY RECEIVEDSSEN Nov 1 8 2005 CHANHASSEN PUNNING DEPT NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Preliminary Plans for Stonefield Chanhassen, Minnesota Date: 10/14/05 Sheet 1 of 11 F. q U f ON ru N 0 0 N 11 0 0 rn at •a 0 inL� X .. 0 0 N i rn i In 0 0 N 02005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. before Denotes /ran Monument set HoursCali 48 S Property� �SCro GOPHER TATE ONE CALL ' �w� • Denotes Iron Monument Found Twin City Area 651-454-0002 �7�I1�J That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, Q Denotes Cost Iron Monument Found Mn. Toil Free 1-800-252-1166 lying westerly of the following described line and its northerly and southerly extensions, • Commencing at the Southeast comer of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence South 89 degrees 04 minutes 49 seconds West, bearing assumed, along the South line a BUSH/SHRUB STREET LITE ❑r TELEPHONE BOX —Paw— POKER OVERHEAD of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 790.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; CONIFEROUS TREE GUY w1RE TELEPHONE MANHOLE —Pum POKER UNDERGROUNDV/(�/ Ma8P AwrbHaMd thence North 1 degree 57 minutes 27 seconds West, o distance of 460.00 feet; thence North 18 degrees 32 minutes 33 seconds East, o distance of 330.00 feet, • thence North 52 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 638.57 feet, thence North 1 degree 57 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of 150.59 DECIDUOUS TREE a POKER POLE feet to a point on the North line of sold Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter EEKI TRAFFIC CONTROL BOX —sAN— SANITARY SEWER distant 156.07 feet Easterly of the Northwest comer of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter as measured along said North line ILI WETLA/VD ❑Q ELECTRIC BOX and there terminating. ® HAND HOLE —sro— STORM SEWER AND 0 STEELIKI POST ELECTRIC METER # TRAFFIC UGHT —TaH— TELEPHONE OVERHEAD fiat part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, described as follows to -wit: The SIGN-7RAFRC/OTHER ELECTRIC MANHOLE ca GATE VALVE —ruc— TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND north 375.00 feet lying Westerly of the following described line, to -wit: Beginning at a point in the North line of said Southwest Quarter of o s SIGN-TRAFFIC/OTHER ® ELECTRIC TOWER HYDRANT —xAT— WATERMA/N Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) distant 849.31 feet West of the Northeast comer thereof, thence Southwesterly deflecting 64 01 60, 120' 180' degrees 42 minutes 04 seconds from West to South from said North line, a distance of 163.19 feet; thence Southerly deflecting to the left O MAIL BOX ®s SANITARY MANHOLE j47 WATER METERFENCE UNE 32 degrees 35 minutes 37 seconds a distance of 125.62 feet, thence Southwesterly deflecting to the right 22 degrees 58 minutes 52 —'— seconds a distance of 302.23 feet; thence Southerfy to the northwest comer of the East 290.75 feet of the West 484.2 feet of the South HANDICAPPED STALL Q SEWER CLEANOUT ❑s CURB STOP BOX zxrax.r DECIDUOUS TREE UNE 539.7 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) as measured along the West and East lines of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4); thence South parallel with the West line of said Southwest Quarter of p PERC TEST ® BEEHIVE CATCH BASIN ® WATER MANHOLE CONIFEROUS TREE UNE the Northwest Quarter to the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) and there terminating, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota. uw MONITORING HELL ® CATCH BASIN WELL CURB & GUTTER 3 AND ® CABLE TV BOX ® FLARED END SEC77ON —crv— CABLE TV p� WINDMILL 2 2 Outiot A, Shenandoah Ridge, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the County Recorder, Carver County, j�c GAS METER ® STORM MANHOLE —cA� GAS UNE BITUMINOUS SURFACE Minnesota. Abstract. CONCRETE SURFACE GRAVEL SURFACE I I Alr'r- ^I I -A / I /// I til IArr-^T ATI I A r)rl/TIIIA/ 41F. YVL. I `t/r7 rd 'k3o 00 f ( r0 07'36 E 46 1$ I 35 1 151 W \ / 491\s1e 1 ;` �✓ 914 I I I WETLAND ® 9 ?6 I i Ww l 916 `r1� iQ. I �/ / ` f C•JSJ` ry �� I `1 I as / 922 5 "5- -fir t 924 y�°5 "' X / N I I 1 / / `\ 92 e+ 925 ✓ ✓ 9932 0 — — 1001, i m < 9 U0 19 /I `I..ygT 5y1/�ryrL \�4 I I / l// '��+N Q.`\ / \ \ • 3 / I I / / -GAS LIN s?R / 6 A� / \ \. /.� , 9► INDICA 4Ja�. fr 3 W o 'tea IO Zis \ TEMPORARY \ \ ` J / / 5 0 2 \ 4 t P. PONING `9�a? \ 932 \ \\ N o EASEDMENT 926 92$ 9 g32 n D gk`L A g j41 n O,jo o T a 934,_ — — — _ \ / I I I t�y� 911, ` vi t ——-----/ I`/ t 24'14"E 2 0 \ SIP1-q, I I ® / _ _ _ 9R- Lo W. LINE` 774E L`__PERMANENT DRA/NA AND U77LI1Y fASEME '` I I I d / Z I SW. 1/4 0 E PER DOC. 169284. - A ®p T I J ' /( / h� i\ .ter 1 S NW. 1 4 SEC. 3 \ l E £AND U77U NO 92S I 19�i' _.n✓' �� / In \N\ 6�2 — I I /9J'� '32"934 N X— N&P,Q7'.52'Ej 300. / 1 `" /"9 942 / } / 946 1. w I \ l v u v C / LZ�IDT,748 38 11000, 09 g1 z _ s e - �- I :• g _ 9 _ / \ I I 942 ~ / //�'--.,9 //95k Jg60r �. j/// (�� X I I I 4ea OAA / L-2 20051114EXF01..DWG Data, 10/14/05 simet 2 op 11 I eoy R" mr om s pnpmw y m. mae my Aa.Idaorr Prepared fog. • Westwood Professional Services Inc. M" ft am d, '"�° Cb~ CINM Plowshares Development, Inc. Stone iet g 7599 Anagram Drive1000C ^_ t Eden Prairie, MN 55344 cwg W. mmon 19D 18rj`j LIK14- EMIM WedtJ suite 590 COIIdltlOriB Phone: 952-937-5150 Fax: 952-1 Vale; 10/14M Lima No, 2M Yaawd tilfdaut CMnliaomn, bftrle80ta R%% Chanhnsml , hChnewta F- 0 U f a Ln N R1 N fH 02005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. I I I I I I I /I I / 1 Tr0 �h a c- \ / 7 I— I I' 15,123 s \ L O�wQ 15,200 sf > �S00006'14"W 150.56 M ------ 507°42'10 t 1-r R X30.00 = 1 - 1,6=3°28'19" Chd. , ,rg. =N80°331390E \ ir-A IA AI ren Ai i I \ I I L�r7L7-I vr-II vL/Vr, r7l I I \I LIV(� Development Data Total Site Area 17.631 as Zoning Standards (Minimums) Existing Zoning Rural - Lot Width ®Setback 90 ft. (100 ft. on Private Rd.) Proposed Zoning RSF - Lot Depth 125 ft. Proposed Land Use Low Density, Residential - Lot Area 15,000 sq. ft. Street Dedication 2.23-+ ac. - Average Lot Area 21,741± sq.ft. Total Proposed Lots 30 - Front Yard Setback 30 ft. Overall Site Density (Gross) 1.7ft Jots/ac. - Side Yard Setback 10 ft. Street dimensions listed reference back of curb. - Rear Yard Setback 30 ft. - Wetland Buffer 16.5 ft. All streets to have curb and gutter as per City standards. - Structure Setback from Buffer 40 ft. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided as required - ROW Width 60 ft. by the City. - Road Width 31 ft. Back -to -Back / / / / A/ q T l I A n it l -rl /-)A l \ `r r7 rI L1 L/I l IV/V Typical Lot (Varies) Street o N,, 90 n o F- o -------o -� 51 1 15 Drainage & 190.00 -,1 Utility Easement I Dimension at Setback I' I NJ 10 I I 15,000± S.F. II 5L— o-------oma---� 0 90 0 (No Scale) Setback Line (See Development Data) Lot Dimension Lot Number Approx. Lot Area Setback Dimension ,., w .,, ,.� .. .�.,•..,, SW COR. NW. 114 OF THE NW. 114 SEC. 23 That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the following described line and its northerly and southerly extensions; Commencing at the Southeast comer of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, • thence South 89 degrees 04 minutes 49 seconds West, bearing assumed, along the South line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 790.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described, • thence North 1 degree 57 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of 460.00 feet; thence North 18 degrees 32 minutes 33 seconds East, a distance of 330.00 feet; thence North 52 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 638.57 feet; thence North 1 degree 57 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of 150.59 feet to a point on the North line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter distant 156.07 feet Easterly of the Northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter as measured along said North line and there terminating. AND That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, described as follows, to -wit: The north 375.00 feet Eying Westerly of the following described line, to -wit: Beginning at a point in the North line of said Southwest Quarter of Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) distant 849.31 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof, • thence Southwesterly deflecting 64 degrees 42 minutes 04 seconds from West to South from said North line, a distance of 163.19 feet; thence Southerly deflecting to the left 32 degrees 35 minutes 37 seconds a distance of 125.62 feet; thence Southwesterly deflecting to the right 22 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds a distance of 302.23 feet; thence Southerly to the northwest corner of the East 290.75 feet of the West 484.2 feet of the South 539.7 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) as measured along the West and East lines of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 114); thence South parallel with the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter to the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) and there terminating, according to the plot thereof on file or of record in the office of the County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota. AND Outlot A, Shenandoah Ridge, according to the plot thereof on file or of record in the office of the County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota. Abstract. W Westwood FYofeW"l %rAa % Inc I �7 �+4 14 rm 0- — I I I M n m' n my R"Wom Crow Prepared fog. 7699 "ram 0&% &vd v4wrvi oe and &9 t = • duly Homed LAND RM"WOR Prairie, --da the 4w, of the Rale of > 10/20/0.5 8"' Pte City m. la (CRN) Plowshares Development, Inc. 11/15/05 LOT CONFIGURATION/ STREET LAYOUT Cbecko& MH PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952.937.5922 DMWZC TIE) TOIL FREE 140"373150 C'rdg W. Morse Romeo Duffles bs/dase 1851 Lake Drive West, Suite 550 WestmMod www.westwoodpLcom Dabs: 11/15/05 Ii®ee No. 23021 I Chanhassen, Sfinnesota 55317 Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 I I ' 111 � J ✓JJ '7160 p - W. LINL Oh IHt / _TEMPORARY ROAD SW. 1/4 OF THE NW. 1/4 SEC, 23 EASEMENT 1 TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC WITH 90.0' DIAMETER Plowshares�shesDeevvelopment, Inc. Nathan Franzen 1851 Lake Drive West Suite 550 Chanhassen, MN. 55317 Phone: (952) 361-0832 Fax: (952) 361-0833 Contacts: Nothon Franzen NOTE The lot dimensions and areas on this plan are approximate. Refer to the Final Plat and supporting data for exact lot dimensions anc areas. it 1'�Z►.tiI:��i ~iii/a �iC Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN. 55344 Phone: (952) 937-5150 Fox: (952) 937-5822 Contact: Curtis Neft FOR CONSTRUCTION Stonef geld 01 60' 120' 180' L-2 2005114PPFOI.DWG Date 10/14/05 sheft 3 oa 11 Preliminary Plat Ln 0 0 (U n 0 m 3 O) C OJ V X X (U N L7 z W d W / L, 3 a / W Ll 0 w M (n U U W 0 0 D_ z z a J 11 U ®2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. / / / \ / \ \ \ m I a 7--- �R DROPOSED WETLAND 3UFFER (TYP) .� .92 6' \ �s \ •9/8 "4 V24,00 W- 0LQe Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 ®SLA ro GENERAL GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES: EROSION CONTROL NOTES: a ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISHED SURFACE/GUTTER e ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN—PLACE a THE SITE MUST BE STABAUZED WITH A 50B SEED MIX k TYPE I GRADES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. DENOTES SOIL BORING x 856.3 DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL MULCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2575 UNLESS OTHERWISE • REFER TO THE SITE PLAN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITE 1 DENOTES SILT FENCE DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERFLOW VIABLE TURF OR GROUND COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE NOTED. DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. I E.O.F. ON—SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED . ALL TEMPORARY STOCKPILES MUST HAVESILT FENCE PLACED • THE CONTRACTOR SHAVERIFY THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING DENOTES HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE ELEVATION INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE LL AROUND THEM TO TRAP SEDIMENT. AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO EROSION CONTROL. UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITH THE OWNERS AND FIELD—VERIFY f` —9 0 DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS + + TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAY BALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE • THE SITE SHALL BE STABAUZED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF FINAL GRADE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE DENOTES EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. COMPLETION. ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN. X980- - DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS + + (MNDOT 3885, CATAGORY 3, WOOD FIBER 2S.) a ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END • ALL PERMANENT PONDS USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS DURING a ALL RCP FOR STORM SEWER SHALL BE CLASS III UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER OF EACH WORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DREDGED AFTER THE SITE HAS BEEN a ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL RULES. ACCORDING TO DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS. STABILIZED TO RESTORE TO THE PROPOSED BOTTOM ELEVATION. a POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE STE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES. DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER a PROPOSED PONDS SHALL BE EXCAVATED FIRST & BE USED AS a ALL EXPOSED SOILS NOT TO BE GRADED FOR: a ALL RETAINING WALLS TO BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCMA � 01 60 120 180 iwvv� DENOTES EXISTING TREE LINE TEMPORARY PONDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. PERFERATED OUTLETS 7 DAYS (2 3:1 SLOPES), 14 DAYS (10:1 TO 3:1), OR STANDARDS 1 SHALL BE PROVIDED. 21 DAYS (10:1 OR FLATTER) SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED. a TOPSOIL RESPREAD SHALL BE 0.5' ON PADS AND 0.5' ON OTHER GREEN AR S r1r1r1rW� DENOTES APPROXIMATE TREE REMOVAL LIMITS L -z 20051114col=01.Dwc NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Date: 10/14/05 sheft 4 OF 11 11 , .d , 6 k of 61 �n me L � m, ,�` CAN for Stonef Held � . dkea . eee � 1.m a a>,I, Ilamsed I%OFMUMAL PTellmul Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 68 km �, d,am.ee. 10/20/05 ReNeed Pe CkY Cam lt8 (CRN) Plov�shaies Devel®pnient, Inc. e 11/15/05 Revised Par City Comment (WR'A� al'lC1i0& ��( 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 °' Grading, Drainage & Phone: 952-937-5150 Fax: 952.937-5622 Ctilltia R. N�tr P.13 ]Paoad li� �� DS'IVB W�� 511�� .SJ� Dda 'W5105 �.. No. 40% °swft b''� , Minnesota 593 7 I ism, bfinnesoft Erosion Control Plan U U o_ co M ro 0 LO 0 0 N U7 0 3 CT m v x x N N .11 z w w i LO3 M w ra 0 w i c� U w M a M z a J U ®2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. OUTLOT A �1 ' 42,831 4f c I J 1 11 0-) / 2 \ 4- 2 -\ W IY W / 1-1 ' \ \ a -7---I—�I\\+ i00 C� N � W W .,. MH -10 MH -11 \ \\ IMINV=9 3.70 Ln +/ \ \ RIM=927.90 \ \ 11 =914.8 \ \ \d Was REMOVE EXISTING +' CORM SEWER MH -4 .k RIM=93.4 J INV=9191 I MH -14 3 RIM=938.3 INV=925.8 L— — — — — — — Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952-937.5150 Fax: 952-937-5822 31 tIM=932.20 \ INV=918.90 / / \ \\ 2 11 F-- ;i�wN I I I 11 Wryw I I I � , I w •r I I F____1 I hereby =dfy da " pim w I I 'by m = wda m, Revislum If wpavW= and *d I as a ddy liomaad PEOEMMONAL MGM= =da the lawn of the Stafa of l8ansof► 1 11A5/05 RWnd Pa qty Canmanta Yik Curtis R. NeB, PS Data 11/15/05 Liaeou Na "I% f NORMAL WATER LEVEL WARNING / HIGH—PRESSURE PIPEUNE(S) / EXCAVATION AND/OR CONSTRUCTION PROHIBITED / WITHOUT COMPLIANCE WITH STATE ONE—CALL, AND / WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM / MAGELLAN PIPELINE COMPANY. EXISTING PROPOSED WETLAND WETLAND (TYP) BUFFER (TYP) PROPOSED 40' WETLAND \ BUFFER SETBACK (TYP) \ \ -- I rRIM LS -0926.40 /! // I I 4A I II 5 INV=913.08 ! 1 3 I I I MH -02 RIM=927.40 INV=913.40 MH -03 I I RIM=930.50 I I / INV=917.40 MH—OA T � 5 ! /! /! 6 I I ! 1 ! 1 I L ---JI L------- L--- A --J DRAINAGE AND UTILITY / a EASEMENT (TYP) J Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 --- I I I I I I \ <' MH -08 I I I RIM=950.10 % I I II I I I I _ I INV=937.0 1 12 g 10 I \ N I "r General Utility Notes • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY DIFFERENCES. • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE THE NECESSARY PERMITS FOR ALL WORK OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY LIMITS. • SEE ARCH. PLAN FOR EXACT BLDG. LOCATION. SEE SITE PLAN FOR LAYOUT DIMENSIONS. SERVICE ENTRY LOCATIONS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE ARCHITECT. • VERIFY EXISTING INVERT LOC. & ELEV. PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. • THE WATER SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MIN. OF 8.0 FT. OF COVER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE CITY AS—BUILT CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO CHECK LOCATION AND MATERIAL TYPE. • ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 3 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR FOR U11UTY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO UTILITY INSTALLATION. • UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST. TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE 1999 ED. OF THE "STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION BY THE CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF MINN." AND TO THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION" MINN. DEPT. OF TRANS., SEPTEMBER 5, 2000 INCLUDING THE CURRENT ADDENDUM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ALL PROCEDURES AS OUTLINED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY. AIM Chariot CRM V=W= All[ Ragged Unwlaa y/daW Prepared for. Plowshares Development, 1851 Lake Drive West, Suite 550 Qlar11188sm, M7I1 m to 5531% IMA 12 I \ MH -09 RIM=957.80 INV -944.7 I I 1 L ---------17r- LL-------- STUB -15 IE.=944.5 EASING SANITARY SEWER — <1 — — WATER I _. .r. HYD. W/VALVE v STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER —4— WATER 4— WATER 1 HYD. W/VALVE 0+ STORM SEWER — N — NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Inc. I Stonefield Chanhassen, 1V1�LlIteaOta AA O�- 0' 60' 120' 180' L-2 20051114UTP01.DWG Date 10/14/05 sheet 5 of 11 Pmlimimu U ' 'ty Plan /_ \ \ \ \ ate/ \ \ \ I I 6 I I \ \ — � � � • � � � I 7 — — — 1I II II n / \ II II I MH -O5 I R M 941.60 I / INV=928.50 / RIM=937.801 L - - - - / IQ \ MH -07 \ \ 8"P RIM=945.80 INV=932.70 --- I I I I I I \ <' MH -08 I I I RIM=950.10 % I I II I I I I _ I INV=937.0 1 12 g 10 I \ N I "r General Utility Notes • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY DIFFERENCES. • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE THE NECESSARY PERMITS FOR ALL WORK OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY LIMITS. • SEE ARCH. PLAN FOR EXACT BLDG. LOCATION. SEE SITE PLAN FOR LAYOUT DIMENSIONS. SERVICE ENTRY LOCATIONS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE ARCHITECT. • VERIFY EXISTING INVERT LOC. & ELEV. PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. • THE WATER SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MIN. OF 8.0 FT. OF COVER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE CITY AS—BUILT CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO CHECK LOCATION AND MATERIAL TYPE. • ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 3 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR FOR U11UTY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO UTILITY INSTALLATION. • UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST. TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE 1999 ED. OF THE "STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION BY THE CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF MINN." AND TO THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION" MINN. DEPT. OF TRANS., SEPTEMBER 5, 2000 INCLUDING THE CURRENT ADDENDUM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ALL PROCEDURES AS OUTLINED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY. AIM Chariot CRM V=W= All[ Ragged Unwlaa y/daW Prepared for. Plowshares Development, 1851 Lake Drive West, Suite 550 Qlar11188sm, M7I1 m to 5531% IMA 12 I \ MH -09 RIM=957.80 INV -944.7 I I 1 L ---------17r- LL-------- STUB -15 IE.=944.5 EASING SANITARY SEWER — <1 — — WATER I _. .r. HYD. W/VALVE v STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER —4— WATER 4— WATER 1 HYD. W/VALVE 0+ STORM SEWER — N — NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Inc. I Stonefield Chanhassen, 1V1�LlIteaOta AA O�- 0' 60' 120' 180' L-2 20051114UTP01.DWG Date 10/14/05 sheet 5 of 11 Pmlimimu U ' 'ty Plan o2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. digging:Call 48 Hours before � 1 MAE _. 11• :11 R• 1 • / PKV w IN1 ,• :!`�� . �� E+�1► � . 1 x �R _ ar �,. Y • �. � •may n d --�_,• - ,ter . i +r1�I6c.,� V tMll1.,+,,�,.�,�,�:te.��, RprFrom) jr Al o`.c�ae..ee �a611. ,��''.I R►p"�,r'//�' WAW - VOW)! .�—. a A POW PM FM L u�rVIO ,` ,`,. pt '/ ,� . 7 / �•- .7 ., ��,. - ,' -_. - +.—� t " �. s � � , i ii► r � _st, �' ` '\'. _` �Iil. _, �1,, . \... G , �j• _ _ ,`` ,\ j� -T .i -- _ -- r �r s/►�� yrs<� - �,�1/ �►, f6r �`�.� \ -� /I�..�►. �_• �r'�v • . . �l• .. I �'-- . �Ir.. ,��i�.. �•'I •\• „Lim-+�it's,•'�•-;+�\ -1r•.,'4'/! �'� `.i 5 � L. • -/i' :_ �\t', ., . , ��`�--��-^� �� .��,...p�.� � '�i 1,•`i�—v,�•. �, r � r � \� �i ��/ ` , a,,' c ',��„"n�'�.w � \ ° �.� � �//U�►- �i��A� ., ri\�l +'r��i.„ � �. ,( �� -�,�":► �...� fir-- ♦c �� 0 K LJr _ . � I WWI Or M'00� ` � .ice^--•�� '\!�� `�� •� ��a5 � � �-��/�:� .��"" `-00 � � I��fL� �� f�l� �� 1�\1".►� i �r. MdMm�- 0000 OEM �-.�. '•y� _ -,,rte' - �� tl=, �' F#•. _.� :�•s,Q�AL I�t{ ty _,/ . •-1{y/�/ �I �aE'w:� .��I�...iY� ■ �� tL',, _�.� '*"' -y'� .. '�� i_ac-.�11r,�ti_:�� r._,.. Vis. U _'�+•�L'.i�+•'� ._.� • PPM .... ._ ... yr 1A M 11 r Mir- Stonefield 111111 Iff i 1712"1 r rut • 0 2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: Q0 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 I, ` Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 \ 1 ' LA 0 I U I f6 42)8 42, 8 I I ZL6 I I I I I '/7- I' 17- 1v 117 L6 —40 Oo 9 J oticZ6/ /i 9 �o /. 918 1I I 2? I / 111 11. -20--- ^.. / '�4• / /i' ` 9Z6 I I /x \ � / \ G'—F 9 6 G / / / 8Z6 \ (yid ro y 96 _ I _G_ 9000 l I I G \� l 100, s2 14 I - \-,J I o - -- 99.54 _ 1 G — 932 1 CO•— g0 13 --_J L— — — — — — ——J I I - r 36 00 18 N / W \/051 = o I— ° — r� �-93p _ 930 I — +- / r _ 'MB l e _r / r m G 7057/ (0 No O 90 00 / l 92a78 � \ I ICD— X7049 �" ' , 9286 7047 / \ 922 aX /\ KB ....- 7 / 7= 6 _16/ \ 9,.J4 , 't"+ /' 7OfJJ \ \\ 92277 923.09 7 K9 11101 022.87 LB 7 9ox fe 94v4z Cir TREE REM LIMI ` BOX 24 C0' t 92 . 703a 7 M1B 7 I � 16719 76117 UA5.p 18173 939.44 941.57 1611 / 94239 Eu 10 gar JZXis 761 6 Bar 14 / I X X 216115 16114 I 76112 16/10p�_ �, / I ✓'' �+�,},_— �• ( / / / ` 940. 38X 18 09.64 5 � 2�aP. ® I I �!` \ / '' ""0 '� '1-014iF/ _U.� ,/! �// 0' 40' 80, 120' d / a L-2 20051114TPP01.DWG z Date: 10/14/05 sht 7 of 11 I hmeby cK t[y 9M thk phn .m. I I I by m. w ands my Prepan dM rOM Und and I = a dvy Ermtmd LANOBGIB > Olobash >� - ��!'_'"' Stone led Tree Preservation . Westwood Professional Services, Inc. ,IaatQPaCI m,� e,e tm,. �,� auk d t� 11/15/05 RSNeien, P. Cny Camm�nts tet, � ]UK Plowshares Development, Inc. Plan 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 g J Hank � � 1$$'1 Lake Dflve West, Fite MI) Phone: 952-937-5150 Fax: 952-937-5822 Dms 11/15/05 Llose No. 1164M Mewl ftLdds b innesata 55319 Chanhumexi, Minnesota 10 l ?lowshares Develonment. Inc. I a-Luncricic 02005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Tree Preservation Data -low Density Readientw Gross Site Area Net Site Area Wetlands Steep slopes Gross Canopy Cover Net Canopy Wetlands Steep slopes Baseline Canopy Cover (4.69 Ac / 17.60 Ac = 27%) Total Required Canopy (30%) (17.35 X .30 = 5.28 Ac.) Canopy Needed (5.28 Ac - 4.69 Ac = .59 Ac.) Canopy Removed (3.44 Ac. to grading limit line) Replacement Required (.59 Ac X 1.0 Ac = .59 Ac. Canopy required above existing) (3.44 Ac X 1.2 Ac = 4.13 Ac. Canopy Removed) Total Replacement Required (4.13 Ac. + .59 Ac. = 4.72 Ac.) Required Trees (4.72 Ac. x 43,560 SF = 205,603 SF / 1089) Landscape Trees Provided Tree Protection Detail Phn n 0 0 N in in 0 17.63 +/-Ac. 17.60 Ac. .03 Ac. .00 Ac. 4.71 Ac. 4.69 Ac. .02 Ac. .00 Ac. 27% 5.28 Ac. .59 Ac. 3.44 Ac. .59 Ac. 4.13 Ac. 4.72 Ac. 189 Trees 189 Trees 1 1 ruining will be done by professionals during appropriate pruning season. 2.No storage of materials, Orange Mesh Construction operation of machinery, or Fence Location as shown development of any sort will - on plan occur within the fence -line Stake every 6' maximum. without approval In writing from the City. 'ost or Equal Construction Staked Every 6' 3.Site grading to be done only after protective measures have been taken, city has approved fencing locations, and all contractors have been briefed on tree preservation techniques. ID# Species Saved/Removed Cal. In. Notes 7031 Black Willow Removed 7 7151 7032 Black Willow Removed 6 7152 7033 Black Willow Removed 7 7153 7034 Black Willow Removed 6 7154 7035 Black Willow Removed 18 X 7036 Black Willow Removed 8 7156 7037 Black Willow Removed 6 7157 7038 Black Willow Removed 12 X 7039 Black Willow Removed 7 7159 7040 Black Willow Removed 7 9067 90681 7041 Black Willow Removed 7 9069 7042 Black Willow Removed 14 X 7043 Black Willow Removed 6 9071 7044 Black Willow Removed 6 9072 7045 Black Willow Removed 7 9075 7046 Black Willow Removed 6 9076 7047 Black Willow Removed 7 9077 7048 Black Willow Removed 6 9078 7049 Black Willow Removed -6- 9079 7050 Lo 5 Black Willow Removed 7 9080 7051 Black Willow Removed 9 9081 7052 Black Willow Removed 7 9082 7053 Black Willow Removed 8 X 7054 Black Willow Removed 7 9084 7055 _ Black Willow Removed 17 9085 7056 Bleck Willow Removee 20 W 7057 Black Willow Removed 9 9087 7061 Black Willow Removed 23 X 7073 Box Elder Saved 35 X 7074 Box Elder Saved 13 90901 7075 American Elm Saved 12 9091 7076 American Elm Saved 8 9092 7077 American Elm Saved 7 9093 7078 Amedcan Elm Saved 10 9094 7079 American Elm Saved 6 9095 7080 American Elm Saved 10 9096 7081 American Elm Saved 8 9097 Bur Oak Elder Saved 8 9098 American Elm Elder Saved 7 9099 Green/White Ash can Elm Savedcan 9208 9100 Box Elder Elm F Saved 6 9101 Box Elder can Elm Saved 22 9102 Sugar Maple ut Hickory Saved 10 9103 American Elm can Elm Saved 8 9104 7092 American Elm Saved 7 9105 7093 Box Elder Saved 6 9106 7094 Eastern Red Cedar Removed 6 9107 --- 9108 7095 American Elm Saved 32 X 7096 American Elm Saved 9 9110 7097 Box Elder Saved 11 9111 7091? American Elm Saved 9 9112 70991 Box Elder Saved 10 9113 7100 American Elm Saved 8 9114 7101 1 American Elm Removed 7 9115 7102 ` American Elm Removed 8 9116 71031 American Elm Removed 9 9117 Sugar Maple Elder Removed 6 9118 Sugar Maple asswood Removed 8 9119 !710V4Box erican Elm Savedasswood 9231 9120 Sugar Maple Removed Saved 26 9121 Bur Oak asswood Saved 11 91221 American Elm asswood Removed 17 X 71ox Elder Saved 9 9124 9125 71131 Box Elder Removed 8 9126 7114 Bittemut Hickory Removed 13 9127 7115 Basswood Removed 7 9128 7116 Basswood Removed 7 9129 7117 Basswood Removed 10 9130 7118 Basswood Removed 6 9131 7119 Sugar Maple Removed 8 9132 71201 Box Elder Removed 17 9133 7121 Sugar Maple Removed 6 9134 7122 Sugar Maple Removed 6 91351 7123 Sugar Maple Removed 6 9136 7124 Sugar Maple Removed 7 9137 7125 Sugar Maple Removed 6 9138 7126 Sugar Maple Removed 8 9139 7127 American Elm Removed 6 9140 7128 Sugar Maple Removed 25 X 7129 Red Oak Removed 12 9142 7130 Sugar Maple Removed 6 9143 7131 American Elm Removed 13 9144 7132 Sugar Maple Removed 7 9145 7133 Sugar Maple Removed 12 X 7134 Sugar Maple Removed 23 X 7135T Sugar Maple Removed 12 X 71361 Sugar Maple Removed 6 9149 7137 Sugar Maple Removed 6 9150 71381 Sugar Maple Removed 6 9151 71391 Sugar Maple Removed 6 9152 7140 Box Elder Removed 11 9153 7141 Box Elder Removed 8 9154 7142 Basswood Removed 7 9155 7143 Sugar Maple Removed 7 9156 7144 Basswood Removed 6 American Elm 7145 Bittemut Hickory Removed 8 Box Elder 7146 Box Elder Removed 6 Sugar Maple 7147 Basswood Removed 6 171481 Box Elder Removed 10 ID# 7149 Species Box Elder Saved/Removed Removed Cal. In. I Notes - 10 1 7150 Sugar Maple Removed 7 ( 7151 Sugar Maple - Removed -8 _ I 7152 Sugar Maple Removed 7 7 7153 Sugar Maple Removed 7 9166 7154 Sugar Maple Removed 7 9171 7155 Sugar Maple Saved 8 9172 7156 Sugar Maple Saved 8 91731 7157 Sugar Maple Saved 8 9174 7158 Box Elder Removed 9 91751 7159 Sugar Maple Saved 9 9178 j 9067 90681 Eastern Red Cedar American Elm Removed Removed 10 6 9179 9069 Bur OakRemoved ---Removed 6 9180 9070 Bur Oak 13 _ 13 9181 9071 Bur Oak Removed 7 9182 9072 Bur Oak Removed 11 9183 9075 Sugar Maple Removed 17 X 9076 Sugar Maple Removed 7 D 9077 Sugar Maple Removed 8 9186 9078 Sugar Maple Removed 7 9187 9079 Sugar Maple Removed 8 9188 9080 Sugar Maple Removed 9 9189 9081 Sugar Maple Removed 6 9190 9082 Sugar Maple Removed 8 9191 90831 Sugar Maple Removed 8_ 9192 9084 Sugar Maple 9 P - R m e oved _ 6 9193 9085 American Elm Removed 10 9194 9086 Sugar Maple Removed 6 9195 9087 Sugar Maple Removed 7 9196 9088 Sugar Maple Removed 6 9197 9089 Sugar Maple Removed 7 9198 90901 Sugar Maple Removed 7 9199 9091 Sugar Maple Removed 6 9200 9092 Sugar Maple Removed 7 9201 9093 Sugar Maple Removed 9 9202 9094 Sugar Maple Removed 7 9203 9095 Sugar Maple 7 6 9204 9096 Bur Oak -Removed Removed 9 9205 9097 Bur Oak Removed 8 9206 9098 American Elm Removed 8 9207 9099 Green/White Ash Removed 7 9208 9100 Box Elder Removed 6 9212 9101 Box Elder Removed 12 9214 9102 Sugar Maple Removed 9 9215 9103 American Elm Removed 11 9216 9104 American Elm Removed 9 9217 9105 Sugar Maple Removed 8 9218 9106 American Elm Removed 11 9219 9107 --- 9108 Sugar Maple -------------------- American Elm Removed ------F -e - -------- Removed 8 ------- 9 --- 9109 Red Oak Removed 14 9221 9110 Sugar Maple Removed 6 9222 9111 Red Oak Removed 15 9223 9112 Red Oak Removed 8 9224 9113 Sugar Maple Removed 7 9225 9114 American Elm Removed 9 9226 9115 Sugar Maple Removed 8 92271 9116 Siberian Elm Removed 8 9228 9117 Sugar Maple Removed 6 9229 9118 Sugar Maple Removed 6 9230 9119 Sugar Maple Removed7 Removed 9231 9120 Sugar Maple Removed _ 10 X 9121 Bur Oak Removed 6 9233 91221 American Elm Removed 12 9234 9123 American Elm Removed 11 9235 9124 9125 American Elm Sugar Maple Removed Removed 6 7 9236 9126 Sugar Maple Removed 8 9237 9127 Sugar Maple Removed 11 X 9128 Bur Oak Removed 10 9239 9129 Bur Oak Removed 9 9240 9130 Sugar Maple Removed 10 9241 9131 Sugar Maple Removed 8 9242 9132 Sugar Maple Removed 10 9243 9133 Sugar Maple Removed 6 9244 9134 Sugar Maple Removed 7 10215 91351 Box Elder Removed 7 10216 9136 Box Elder Removed 7 102171 9137 Box Elder Removed 7 1_021'i§j 9138 Sugar Maple Removed 6 102191 9139 Sugar Maple Removed 6 10220 9140 Rock Red Elm Removed 8 10221 9141 Sugar Maple Removed 8 102221 9142 GreenlWhite Ash Removed 9 10223 9143 Green/White Ash Removed 11 10224, 9144 Sugar Maple Removed 8 10225 9145 Sugar Maple Removed 8 10226 9146 Sugar Maple Removed 8 10227, 9147 Sugar Maple Removed 7 10 9148 Sugar Maple Removed 6 102291 9149 Sugar Maple Removed 7 10230 9150 Sugar Maple Removed 7 10231 9151 Sugar Maple Removed 7 10232 9152 Sugar Maple Removed 7 10233 9153 Box Elder I Removed 10 10234 9154 Red Oak Removed 21 10235 9155 1 Amen can Elm Removed 13 10236 9156 Cottonwood Removed 15 10237 ID # l Species_ A 9157? merican Elm Saved/Removed Removed Cal. In. 11 Notes 91621 Cottonwood Removed 24 7 6'16-31 American Elm Removed 21 X 9164 American Elm Removed 6 7 9165 American Elm Removed 12 _ 9166 American Elm Removed 9 Removed 9171 American Elm Removed 12 Removed 9172 American Elm Removed 1 Removed 91731 American Elm Removed 12 Removed 9174 American Elm Removed 7 Saved 91751 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Removed 9178 j Sugar Maple Removed 8 X 9179 Green/White Ash Removed 11 Removed 9180 Green/White Ash Removed 13 Removed 9181 Sugar Maple Removed 6 _ Removed 9182 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Removed 9183 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Removed 91841 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Saved 9185 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Saved 9186 Sugar Maple Removed 8 Saved 9187 American Elm Removed - 9 Saved 9188 Sugar Maple Removed 10 Saved 9189 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Saved 9190 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Saved 9191 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Saved 9192 Sugar Maple Removed_ 7 Saved 9193 Sugar Maple R Removed 7 Saved 9194 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Saved 9195 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Saved 9196 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Saved 9197 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Saved 9198 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Saved 9199 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Saved 9200 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Removed 9201 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Removed 9202 Sugar Maple Removed 8 Removed 9203 Eastern Red Cedar Removed 7 Removed 9204 American Elm Removed 9 Removed Removed 9205 American Elm Removed 10 Removed 9206 American Elm Removed 8 Removed 9207 Red Oak Removed 7 Removed 9208 American Elm Removed 6 Removed 9212 Eastern Red Cedar Removed 8 X 9214 American Elm Removed 6 Removed 9215 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Removed 9216 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Removed 9217 Sugar Maple Removed 8 Removed 9218 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Removed 9219 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Removed 9220 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Removed 9221 Sugar Maple Removed 9 Removed 9222 Sugar Maple Removed 8 Removed 9223 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Removed 9224 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Removed 9225 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Removed 9226 Sugar Maple Removed 37 S 92271 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Removed 9228 Sugar Maple Removed 8 Removed 9229 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Removed 9230 Sugar Maple Removed 8 Removed 9231 Green/White Ash Removed 13 Removed 9232 Green/White Ash Removed 8 Removed 9233 American Elm Removed 11 Removed 9234 American Elm Removed 12 D 9235 Green/White Ash Removed 9 Removed 9236 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Removed 9237 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Removed 9238 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Removed 9239 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Removed 9240 Sugar Maple Removed 32 S 9241 Sugar Maple Removed 1 7 Removed 9242 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Removed 9243 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Removed 9244 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Removed 10215 Sugar Maple Removed 9 10423 10216 Sugar Maple Removed 7 __Removed - Removed 102171 Basswood Removed 10 Removed 1_021'i§j Bitternut Hickory Removed 9 Removed 102191 Sugar Maple Removed 8 Removed 10220 Sugar Maple Removed 8 Removed 10221 Box Elder Removed 10 Removed 102221 Sugar Maple Removed 7_ Removed 10223 Sugar Maple _ Removed 6 Removed 10224, Sugar Maple Removed 6 Removed 10225 Sugar Maple Removed 9 Removed 10226 Sugar Maple Removed 8 Removed 10227, Sugar Maple Removed 6 Removed 10 Sugar Maple Removed 9 Removed 102291 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Removed 10230 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Removed 10231 Box Elder Saved 7 Removed 10232 American Elm Removed 17 X 10233 American Elm Removed 7 Removed 10234 Box Elder Removed 15 Removed 10235 American Elm Saved 6 Removed 10236 American Elm Saved 9 Removed 10237 American Elm Saved 7 Removed 10238 Box Elder Saved 11 Removed 10239 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Removed ID # Species Saved/Removed Cal. In. Notes 10240 Sugar Maple _ Saved 7 102416 Box Elder Saved 6 10243 Bitternut Hickory Removed 7 10244 Bitternut Hickory Removed 7 10245 Bitternut Hickory Removed 7 10246 Green/White Ash Removed 11 102471 Sugar Maple Removed 15 X 10248 Sugar Maple Removed 6 10249 Bitternut Hickory Saved 9 10250 Sugar Maple Removed 10 D 10251 Sugar Maple Removed 6 10252 Sugar Maple Removed 7 10253 American Elm Removed 9 102541 -Sugar-Maple Sugar Maple _ Removed 6 102551 Box Elder Removed 15 10358 10256 Sugar Maple Removed 6 10359 10257 Sugar Maple Saved 7 10360 10258 Box Elder Saved 9 10361 ? 10259 Sugar Maple Saved 8 10362 10260 Sugar Maple Saved 8 10363; American Elm 10364 American Elm 10261 Box Elder Saved 7 Box Elder 102621 Sugar Maple Saved 8 American Elm 102631 Box Elder Saved 8 American Elm 10264 Sugar Maple Saved 8 American Elm 10265 Sugar Maple Saved 8 American Elm 10266 Box Elder Saved 11 Green/White Ash Saved Box Elder der Saved 10 Green/White Ash 10268 Sugar Maple Saved 7 American Elm 10269 Red Oak Saved 15 Sugar Maple 10270 Sugar Maple Saved 6 American Elm 10271 Sugar Maple Saved 6 American Elm 10272 Box Elder Saved 10 American Elm 10273 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Green/White Ash_ 10274 Sugar Maple Removed 10 Siberian Elm 10275 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Green/White Ash 10276 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Box Elder Removed Removed Removed 10381 .. 10278 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Box Elder 10279 Box Elder Removed 9 Green/White Ash 10280 Sugar Maple Removed 8 Green/White Ash 10281 Ironwood Removed 11 -- Box Elder 10282 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Sugar Maple 10283 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Sugar Maple 10284 Sugar Maple Removed 10389 Basswood 10285 Sugar Maple Removed _7 7 Sugar Maple 10289 Green/White Ash Removed 24 American Elm 102901 Sugar Maple Removed 8 American Elm 10291 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Sugar Maple 10292 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Green/White Ash 10293 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Basswood 10294 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Green/White Ash 10295 Sugar Maple Removed 7 Maple 10296 Sugar Maple Removed 6 _ en/White Ash 10297 GreenlWhite Ash Removed 10 Green/White Ash 10298 Sugar Maple Removed 41 D 10299 Sugar Maple Removed 38 D 10300 Box Elder Removed 6 Sugar Mapie 10301 Box Elder Removed 11 Sugar Maple GreenlWhite Ash 10302 Red Oak Removed 28 X 10303 American Elm Removed 9 Saved 10304 Red Oak Removed 8 Saved Saved 10305 American Elm Removed 6 Saved 103061 American Elm Removed 6 Saved 10308 American Elm Removed 6 Removed_ 10309 American Elm Removed 9 Saved 10310 Box Elder Removed 8 Removed 10311 Box Elder Removed 21 X 10312 American Elm Removed 8 Removed 10313 American Elm Removed 16 Saved 103141 American Elm Removed 7 Removed 103151 American Elm Removed 6 Removed 10316 American Elm Removed 6 Removed 10317 Box Elder Removed 11 Removed 10318 American Elm 10423 8 Removed 10319 American Elm __Removed - Removed 8 Removed 10320 Box Elder Removed 11 Removed 10321 Green/White Ash Removed 10 Saved 10322 American Elm Removed 7 Saved 10323 American Elm Removed 6 Saved 10324 Box Elder Removed 8 Saved 10325 Box Elder Removed 8 Saved 10326 Box Elder Removed 7 Saved 10327 Box Elder Removed 7 Saved 10328 GreenlWhite Ash Removed 8 Saved 10329 Green/White Ash Removed 10 Saved 10330 Green/White Ash Removed 11 _ Saved 1 10331 American Elm Removed 14 Saved 10332 Green/White Ash Removed 7- - Saved Removed 10333 American Elm Removed 9 Saved 10334 American Elm Removed 9 Removed 10335 Green/White Ash Removed 12 Removed Removed 10336 American Elm Removed 11 10337 American Elm Removed 11 10338 GreenlWhite Ash Removed 10 10339 Siberian Elm Removed 11 10340 American Elm Removed 7 10341 Green/White Ash Removed 11 10342f_ American Elm Removed 11 ID# Species Saved/Removed Cal. In. Notes 10343 Green/White Ash Removed 10 10344 American Elm Removed 6 L!2345 American Elm Removed 8 10346 Green/White Ash Removed 10 10347 American Elm Removed 7_ 10348 Green/White Ash Saved -� 20 10349 American Elm Saved 15 10350 American Elm Saved 10 10351 Box Elder Saved 8 10352 Box Elder Saved 17 D 10353 Box Elder Saved 13 10354 Box Elder Saved 7 10355 American Elm Saved 11 10356 G_reen/WhiteAsh Saved 9 -i-0-35-7 American Elm Saved 6 9 10358 American Elm Saved 6 29 10359 American Elm Saved 12 7 10360 American Elm Saved 11 12 10361 ? American Elm Saved 7 6 10362 American Elm Saved 7 8 10363; American Elm 10364 American Elm Saved _ Saved _ 9 8 X 10365 Box Elder Saved 17 X 10366 American Elm Saved 9 Saved Saved 10367 American Elm Saved 13 Saved 10368] American Elm Saved 10 Removed 103691 American Elm Saved 9 Saved 103701 Green/White Ash Saved 15 X 10371 Green/White Ash Saved _ _ - 6 Saved 103721 American Elm Saved 6 Removed 10373 Sugar Maple Removed 6 Removed 10374 American Elm Removed 8 Removed 10375 American Elm Removed 7 Removed 10376 American Elm Removed 7 Removed 10377 Green/White Ash_ Saved 12 Removed 10378 Siberian Elm _ - Removed 12 6 Removed 10379 Green/White Ash Removed American Elm Removed 10380' Box Elder Removed Removed Removed 10381 American Elm Removed Removed 10382 Box Elder Removed Removed 10384 Green/White Ash Removed Removed 10385 Green/White Ash Saved M22 Removed 10386 -- Box Elder Saved 10387 Sugar Maple Saved 10388 Sugar Maple Saved 10389 Basswood Saved 103901 Sugar Maple Saved 6 3782 103911 American Elm Saved 7 10392 American Elm Saved 10 10393 Sugar Maple - Saved 6 10394 Green/White Ash Saved 10 10395 Basswood Saved 7 10396 Green/White Ash Saved 9 10397Sugar Maple Saved 6 10398 -Gr _ en/White Ash Saved 8 10399 Green/White Ash Saved 10 10400 - Sugar Maple Saved - 6 10401 10402 Box Elder GreenlWhite Ash Saved Removed 8 15 -1_0403_ Sugar Mapie Saved 6 10404 104051 Sugar Maple GreenlWhite Ash Removed Saved 8 14 10406 GreenlWhite Ash 10407 Bitternut Hickory Saved Saved 10 6 104081 Sugar Maple Saved 7 10409 10410 Sugar Maple Ironwood Saved Saved 6 8 10411 Sugar Maple Saved 7 10412 Sugar Maple Saved 8 104133 Sugar Maple Removed_ 8 11044114_3 Sugar Maple Saved �7 104151 Green/White Ash Removed 8 104161 Green/White Ash Removed 7 104171 GreenlWhite Ash Removed 6 10418 Green/White Ash Saved 10 10419 GreenlWhite Ash Removed 8 104201Sugar Maple Removed 8 10421 _ Sugar Maple Removed 7 10422 Green/White Ash Removed 17 10423 Red Oak Removed 8 10424i GreenlWhite Ash Removed 11 10425 Sugar Maple Removed 7 10426 Sugar Maple Saved 7 10427 Sugar Maple Saved 6 10428 Sugar Maple Saved 7 104293 Sugar Maple Saved 7 10430' Sugar Maple Saved 16 X 104311 Green/White Ash Saved 12 104321 GreenlWhite Ash Saved 8 10433 GreenlWhite Ash Saved 8 10434 Sugar Maple Saved 9 10435 _ Sugar Maple _ Saved 1 6 10436 Ironwood Saved 8 10437 10438 Sugar Maple Sugar Maple - Saved Removed 7 6 10439 Sugar Maple Saved 8 104401 Sugar Maple- Removed 8 10441 10442 Sugar Maple -Sugar Maple Removed Removed 8 6 ID# 10443 Species Sugar Maple Saved/Removed Removed Cal. In. 8 Notes 10444 Sugar Maple Removed 7 10445 Sugar Maple Removed 6 10446 Sugar Maple Removed 7 104471 Sugar Maple Removed 7 104481 Sugar Maple Removed 7 10449 Sugar Maple Removed 9 10450 Sugar Maple Removed 7 10451 Sugar Maple Removed 7 10452 Sugar Maple Removed 6 10453 American Elm Removed 6 D 10454 Sugar Maple Removed 6 10455 Sugar Maple Removed 6 10456 Sugar Maple Removed 22 10457 Sugar Maple Removed 25 10458 Green/White Ash Removed 9 10459 Sugar Maple Saved 29 10460 Sugar Maple Removed 7 10461 Green/White Ash Saved 12 10462 Sugar Maple Saved 6 10463 Green/White Ash Saved 8 10464 Basswood Saved 8 104656 Red Oak Saved 12 10466 10467 Red Oak Ironwood Saved Saved 9 6 10468 Red Oak Saved 30 S 10469 Bitternut Hickory Removed 6 10470 Bitternut Hickory Saved 10 10471 Red Oak Removed 10 10472 Ironwood Saved 11 X 10473 Red Oak Removed 11 10474 Sugar Maple Removed 6 16110 Box Elder Removed 23 X 16111 Box Elder Removed 14 16112 Box Elder Removed 35 16114 Box Elder Removed 19 16115 Box Elder 6 Removed 36 X 16116 American Elm Removed 11 16117 16119 Box Elder American Elm Removed Removed 32 10 X 16120 Box Elder Removed 24 16121 Box Elder Removed 18 161511 Black Willow Removed 17 X 161731 Box Elder Removed 18 , Total Trees (Cal. In.) 5098 Total Cal. In. Removed 3782 Total Cal. In. SavedA3 1316 Notes: X = Split Tree D = Diseased/Damaged Tree S = Specimen Tree Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 L-2 20051114TPP03.DWG »ate 10/14/05 Smelt 9 of 11 I boft a rMy "" plm wr porn" by ra a uedr my "b°° `q""°° n°' = ` °'m°" °°` Stone a Tree Preservation . Westwood Professional Services, Inc. ,,�,.= ae"dr 612 r.,., of the crate at Ylmml► 11/15/03 Rwl..d Per City aammanb (wRxq � Plowshares Develop�ient, Inc. Invento Plan 7599 Anagram Drive awdd& Eden Prairie, MN 55344 $dwad X hock Ddmrm JIM 1851 bake Drive Wests Suite 550 Phone: 952-937-5150 Fax: 952-937-5822 Dda 1VU105 noxa No. 16454 1 1 eaaad Dswln_bda"Is I ilu esoft SW I Chanhassm A inueeatd U ®2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. DATUM ELEV 915.00 0 N LO m DATUM ELEV 910.00 L.P. ELEV = 931.19 L.P. STA = 6+91.13 PVI STA = 6+65 PVI ELEV = 925.00 A.D. = 15.38 K = 21.45 DATUM ELEV 905.00 OSPREYL.P. STA ELEV 13+ 4 1 8 Q�1 STA = 13+00 PVI ELEV = 927.93 A.D. = 2.30 K = 43.50 nnnnne•rn r. .r�nn ♦nr PIPE LINE PVI STA = 20+00 PVI ELEV = 932.10 A.D. = 6.31 K = 41.23 260.00' VC I AM Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952.937-5150 Fax: 9S2-937-5922 I hereby entity that thb phm mu prepped by me or -der my Radalama dhed supervision and that I an a duty Hemeed FROMMONAL ING MM ®da the 1n of the State of Mooasoht. 1 11/15/05 Raviabns Par City Comments (MRW) Catch IL Neft, PS Dam "M105 Unnne No. 44198 S T REE T A NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0' 50' 100' 150' Dadxw& CRN Qtadilk ON Diawm WRW Record Dnwma y/ddo Prepared for. Plowshares Development, Inc. 1851 Lake Drive West, Suite 550 Chani usm, Mhumota 55317 Stonefield Chan eaam, Ifimseota L-2 20051114DTP02.DWG Date 10/14/05 Sheet 10 OF 11 Street Profile Plan L) U x IL W (n n M M 0 Ln 0 0 N 11N ..r C) O H U W O n d F-1 Z Q J U Local Governmental Unit CITY OF CHANHASSEN Prepared for WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT Goers Property NW 1/4 of Section 23, T1 16N, R23W Chanhassen, Minnesota SEPTEMBER 2005 City of Chanhassen Ms. Lori Haak 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Hugo, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1135 Fax: (952) 227-19359 Mr. Nathan Franzen Plowshares Development, LLC P ,1851 Lake Drive West, Suite 550 DEVELOPMENT,".. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 361-0832 Fax: (952) 361-0833 Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. W7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie. MN 55344 Phone: (952) 937-5150 Fax: (952) 937-5822 Project No.: 20051114..00 WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT Goers Property City of Chanhassen, Minnesota September 14, 2005 CONTENTS WETLAND DELINEATION NARRATIVE • Wetland Delineation Results • Wetland Delineation Summary Table • Wetland Classification Systems Table EXHIBITS 1. Site Location and USGS Topography 2. National Wetlands Inventory Mapping 3. Soils Mapping 4. Wetland Boundary Map WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORMS REPORT PURPOSE This delineation report and the attached exhibits and data forms constitute the wetland delineation report for the site referenced above. This delineation report provides the required documentation for wetland boundary determinations in conformance with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act of 1991. Westwood requests that the City of Chanhassen as the Local Governmental Unit (LGU)provide written confirmation that the delineated wetland boundaries shown on the attached Wetland Boundary Mao are acceptable for local administration of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The site is located in the NW V4 of Section 23, T116N, R23W, City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota (Exhibit 1). The site is bordered by residential development to the north, undeveloped forested land to the south, private residences and agricultural fields to the east and west. The site consists of wetland; a seasonally flooded, steep, wooded ravine; soybean fields; and forested upland. WETLAND DELINEATION METHODOLOGY Westwood delineated and flagged a total of six wetlands throughout the site on August 18, 2005. Wetlands were delineated using the level two routine determination method set forth in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, Waterways Experiment Station, 1987), in which sampling transects were established in representative transition zones of identi tied wetlands. Transects consisted of one sampling point in upland and one point in wetland. Soils, vegetation, and hydrology information were recorded for each point on data forms, which a, the back of this report. Species dominance for vegetation measurements was based on the : _ Westwood Professional Services, Inc. (952) 937-5150 Wetland Delineation Report — Gores Property September 14, 2005 Page 2 or basal coverage visually estimated within a 30 -foot radius for the tree and shrub layers and a five-foot radius for the herbaceous layer within the community type sampled. Wetlands were classified according to Wetlands of the United States (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Circular 39; Shaw and Fredine; 197 1) and Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (FWS/OBS Publication 79/31; Coward et. al. 1979) (see the Classification Systems Table at the end of this narrative). Common names for vegetation identified in this report and on the attached data forms generally correspond with the nomenclature used in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: North Central (Region 3) (USFWS, Reed, 1988) and/or Vascular Plants of Minnesota (University of Minnesota, Ownbey and Morley, 1991). Prior to delineating wetland boundaries in the field, Westwood reviewed National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) mapping (1989) (Exhibit 2), the Soil Survey of Carver County, Minnesota (1980) and the Digital Soil Survey — Carver County Metropolitan Council, 1998 (Exhibit 3), and the DNR Public Waters and Wetlands Inventory PWI for Carver County (Minnesota DNR, 1985). The wetland boundaries were marked using pink "wetland delineation" pin flags, and located using professional surveying methods. The location of the wetlands are shown on the attached Wetland Boundary Map (Exhibit 4). RESULTS Mapping No NWI wetlands are mapped on the property. The soil survey of Carver County indicates that the soils listed below are mapped on the Goers Property (Exhibit 3). The Hamel Loam complex is listed as hydric soil (Hydric Soils of Minnesota, revised December, 1995). All other soils are indicative of uplands. Soil Number Soil Name Hydric? HM Hamel Loam Yes KB Kilkenny -Lester Loams, 2-6 % slopes No KB2 Lester -Kilkenny Loams, 2-6 % slopes, eroded No KD Lester -Kilkenny Loams, 12-18 % slopes No KE2 Lester -Kilkenny Loams, 18-25 % slopes, eroded No N133 Lester -Kilkenny Clay Loams, 12-18 % slopes, severely eroded No NE3 Lester -Kilkenny Clay Loams, 18-25 % slopes, severely eroded No TC Terril Loam, 0-6 % slopes No The DNR Public Waters and Wetlands Inventory for Carver County (Minnesota DNR, 1985) indicates that no DNR Public Waters, Wetlands, or Watercourses exist within the Goers site. Wetland Descriptions Westwood delineated six wetlands totaling 6,0671 square feet (1.39 acres) within the property boundary (two Type 1, one Type 2, one Type 3, and one Type 6 wetlands, and one riverine system). The six delineated wetlands (Wetland A through F) are depicted on the attached Wetland Boundary Map and are described in the following Wetland Summary Table. Detailed data collected at the sample points for these wetlands are provided in the attached data forms. Westwood Professional Services, Inc. (952) 937-5150 Wetland Delineation Report — Gores Property September 14, 2005 Page 3 CONCLUSIONS Westwood delineated and flagged six wetlands (Wetlands A, B, C, D, E, and F) totaling 60,671 square feet (1.39 acres) within the project area. Westwood found NWI to be inconsistent with field observations. More wetlands were delineated on the site than are depicted on NWI mapping (see Exhibits 2 and 4). Westwood requests that the City of Chanhassen as the Local Govemmental Unit (LGU), provided written confirmation that the delineated wetland boundaries shown on the attached Wetland Boundary Map are acceptable for local administration of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act This property is privately owned This request for wetland boundary confirmation does not constitute permission to access the property without contacting Westwood Professional Services Inc or Westwood's Client Please call me at (952) 906-7495 if you have questions or reauire additional information. Sincerely, WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC Z,c Z Thomas Nickel Environmental Scientist Westwood Professional Services, Inc. (952) 937-5150 Wetland Delineation Report — Gores Property September 14, 2005 Page 4 Wetland Delineation Summary Table Hydric NWI Dominant Vegetation Hydrology Depth Munsell Soil Wetland Classification Soils? Wetland? (t 20%cover) (inches) Colors (Saturation/Static Water) Matrix, Mottles I.D. Size (S.F.) Circular 39 Cowardin Mapped?/ Observed? Yes/No Wetland Upland Wetland Upland Wetland Upland A 1,182 Type 1 PEMA Yes/Yes No Reed canary grass Smooth brome, box elder, >27/>27 >14/>14 A:10YR3/1, A: 10YR3/2, Canada thistle 5Y514 none Reed canary grass, B 6,580 Type 3 PEMH Yes/Yes No smartweed, purple Kentucky bluegrass, box 0/3 >15h15 A:10YR2/1, A: 10YR211, loosestrife, box elder, elder none none sand bar willow C 40,915 Type 6 PSSC Yes/Yes No Spotted touch-me-not, Kentucky bluegrass, box >361>36 >15/>15 A:10YR3/t, Highly disturbed sandbar willow elder 10YR3/1 soils D 1,098 N/A R4UBA No/Yes No No vegetation present Sugar maple, common inundated/ >12/>12 Creek bed A: 10YR3/2, buckthorn 1 none E 9,995 Type 2 PEMB Yes/Yes No Reed canary grass, Soy beans >22/>22 >20/>20 A:10YR3/1, A: 10 river bulrush 10YR3/4 10YR3/4 F 901 Typal PEMH No/Yes No Reed canary grass, Kentucky bluegrass >5/>9 >15/>15 A:10YR3/1, A: 10YR3/2, black willow none none Remarks: The upland soil adjacent to Wetland C is highly disturbed and exhibits a variety of colors; therefore a matrix color was not identifiable. Total 60,671 Wetland D is a highly channelized creek system with steep banks and flowing water. Due to the presence of standing water in creek, no soil profile 1.39 acres was conducted and flags were place at the toe of slope. Wetland size and classification represents wetlands located within the property boundary, which differ somewhat from the classifications of wetlands shown on NWI mapping. 1 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. (952) 937-5150 W Westwood Professional Services, Inc. WETLAND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS Cowardin Wetland Classification System Source: Wetlands and Dee water Habi[ats o%the United States (FWS/OBS Publication 79/31; Cowardin et. al. 1979). System Symbol Subsystems - System Specific Classes Symbology Sample Lacustrine L (1) Limnetic 2 Littoral RB, UB, AB, OW, RS, US, EM, SYMBOLOGY EXAMPLE SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM /CLASS L2EM2F SUBCLASS. WATER REGIME UPLAND (NON -WETLAND) ° nzowH (LINEAR DEEPWATER HABITAT) represents upland areas. but may include p - unclassified photo i ded wetlands such as man -modified areas. non photo identifiable areas and/or unintentional omissions Palustrine P None RB, UB, AB, US, ML, EM, SS, FO, OW Riverine R (1) Tidal Lower (2) Perennial Upper (3) Perennial (4) Intermittent 5 Unknown Perennial RB, UB, SB, AB, RS, US, EM, OW Classes Type Special Modifiers Water R291mes Rock Bottom RB b - beaver d - Partially drained ditched f - Farmed h - diked/impounded r - artificial substrate s - spoil x - excavated A - Temporarily flooded B - Saturated C - Seasonally flooded D - Seasonally flooded/well drained E - Seasonally saturated F - Semi -permanently flooded G - Intermittently exposed H - Permanently flooded J - Intermittently flooded K - Artificially flooded Unconsolidated Bottom UB Streambed SB Aquatic Bed AB Rocky Shore RS Unconsolidated Shore Us Emergent EM Open Water OW Moss Lichen ML Scrub Shrub $$ Forested FO Circular 39 Wetland Classification System Source: Wetlands of the United States U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Circular 39; Shaw and Fredine, 1971 Type and Definition I I I Approximate Cowardin :Equivalents Type 1: Seasonally flooded basin PEMA, PFOA, PUS Type 2: Wet meadow PEMB Type 3: Shallow marsh PEMC, PEMF, PSSH, PUBA, PUBIC Type 4: Deep marsh L2ABF, L2EMF, L2EMG L2US, PABF, PABG PEMG, PEMH PUBB PUBF Type 5: Shallow open water L1, L2ABG, L2ABH, L2EMA, L2EMB, L2EMH, L2RS, L2UB, PABH, PUBG, PUBH Type 6: Shrub swamp PSSA, PSSC, PSSF, PSSG, PSS1, PSSS, PSS6B T e 7: Wooded swam PF01, PFO5, PFO6B, PFOC, PFOF T e 8: Bo PFO2, PFO4, PFO7B, PSS2, PSS3, PSS4, PSS7B Westwood Professional Services, Inc. (952) 937-5150 EXHIBITS /_1►1C DATA FORMS C 2005 Westwood Professional Service., Inc. Lata Source(s): USGS/MnDNR DRG (Shakopee, Revised 1993). Legend = Approximate Property Boundary Map Document (P.\20051114\gis\20051114drgOIA.mxd) 9/14/2005 -- 12:48:51 PM wWestwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952-937-5150 0 2,000 Goers Property Chanhassen, Minnesota N Feet 4,000 )k Site Location and USGS Topography EXHIBIT I 92W5 Westwood Pmfewiwal Services, Im. Data Source(s): Aerials Express (2002), USFWS NWl (1989). Legend Approximate Property Boundary _ NWI Wetlands Map Document: (P:\20051114\gis\20051114nwi01A.mxd) 8/17/2005 -- 12:56:11 PM WWestwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952-937-5150 0 200 Goers Property Chanhassen, Minnesota N =j Feet 400 National Wetlands Inventory Mapping EXHIBIT 2 ® 2005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Lata Source(s): Aerials Express (2002), Met Council, Digital Soil Survey -Carver County (2004). N Le end Feet A 9 o zoo aoo Approximate Property Boundary _ Hydric Soils Map Document: (P:\200511141gis120051114soilOt A.mxd) 8/17/2005 -- 1:02:04 PM WNhstfmod Profesienal Services, Inc 7599 Anagnm Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55341 952-937-51511 Goers Property Chanhassen, Minnesota Soils Mapping EXHIBIT 3 02005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Data Smce(s): USDA FSA APFO, DOQ (7003), WPS (2005). Legend 0 Approximate Property Boundary Delineated Wetland Wetland Within Property Map Document:(P120051114kji5\20051114wbd01A.rnxd) 9/13/2005 -- 12:44:41 PM wWestwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952-937-5150 0 200 Goers Property Chanhassen, Minnesota =3 Feet 400 Wetland Boundary Map EXHIBIT 4 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM (ROUTINE DETERMINATION METHOD) Project Name/Job No.: Goers Property/20051114 Date: August 18, 2005 Investigator(s): _ Westwood Prof. Services — Genevieve Bolling City/Twsp. Chanhassen Wetland Identification: Wetland A County & State Caver/MN Transect Sample Point: Flag Al # of Flags: Al -A7 VEGETATION SAMPLE POINT Wet side n un <ide n NIA n Common Name Dominants 2:20 percent) Scientific Name Stratum % Cover Intl. Status Reed canary grass Phalan anindinacea H 100 FACW+ % Cover Ind. Status Smooth brome Bromus inermis H so UPL Box elder Acre negundo T 50 FACW- Canada thistle Circium arvense Oof Dominants FAC or wetter. 100 Remarks: Overall Dominant Ve etation/Communi : Reed canary ass /Type I —Temporarily flooded basin SAMPLE POINT W., aiA. rl 11. aid. M. NIA t1 mon Name Dominants 2:20 percent)Scientific Name Stratum % Cover Ind. Status Smooth brome Bromus inermis H so UPL Box elder Acre negundo T 50 FACW- Canada thistle Circium arvense H 20 UPL Flattened Vegetation Undetermined - Explain: Draina a Patterns Remarks: below toe of slope % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 33 Remarks: Overall Dominant Vegetation/Community: See plants listed above/Wooded upland SAMPLE POINT HYDROLOGY Wet side ❑x Un side ❑ NIA ❑ PrIni Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators 2 required) Welland Hydrology Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels X Yes Saturated, Depth (in) Water -Stained Leaves No Water in borehole, Depth (in) >27 X Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test X Assumed - Explain: two Drift Lines X Topographic Position secondary indicators Sediment Deposits Other- Explain: Flattened Vegetation Undetermined - Explain: Draina a Patterns Remarks: below toe of slope SAMPLE POINT W., aid. n Nn aid. n NIA n Primary Hydrol!2U Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators 2 required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels Yes Saturated, Depth (in) Water -Stained Leaves X No: Water in borehole, Depth (in) >114 Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test Assumed - Explain: Drift Lines Topographic Position Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: Flattened Vegetation Undetermined - Explain: Draina a Patterns Remarks: above toe of slope; soils very dry 1 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM (ROUTINE DETERMINATION METHOD) Project Name/Job No.: Goers Property/20051114 Date: August 18, 2005 Investigator(s): Westwood Prof. Services — Genevieve BoWmg Citylrwsp. Chanhassen Wetland Identification: Wetland B County & State Caver/MN Transect Sample Point: Flag Bl # of Flags: Bl -B13 VEGETATION SAMPLE POINT Wm mdn rail ii., ..de n NrA n Common Name Dominants 2 20percent) Scientific Name Stratum % Cover Ind. Status Sand bar willow Salix mgua T 50 OBL Box elder Acernegundo T 50 FACW- Reed canary grass Phalaris amndinacm H 20 FACW+ Smartweed Polygonum s . H 20 OBL Purple loosestrife L thrum salicaria H 20 OBL % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 100 Remarks: Overall Dominant Vegetation/Community: en water with cattail frin e/T3 —Shallow marsh SAMPI F POINT We.a:de n ..._ n k11A n Common Name Dominardst20 rcent HYDROLOGY SAMPLE POINT Wet side &l u.. ade n Nle n Primary Hydrology Indicators Sciendflc Name Stratum %Cover Ind. Status Kentucky bluegrass Poa pratewis H loo FAC - Box elder Acer ne ndo T too FAWC- X Saturated, Depth (in) 0 Water -Stained Leaves No X Water in borehole, Depth (in) 3 X Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test Assumed - Drift Lines X_ Topographic Position Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 100 Remarks: Overall Dominant Vegetation/Community: See plants listed above/Wooded upland HYDROLOGY SAMPLE POINT Wet side &l u.. ade n Nle n Primary Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators 2 required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels X Yes X Saturated, Depth (in) 0 Water -Stained Leaves No X Water in borehole, Depth (in) 3 X Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test Assumed - Drift Lines X_ Topographic Position Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: Flattened Vegetation Undetermined - Explain: Drainage Pattems Remarks: 1 11 SAMPLE POINT Wet side Fl Uoslde W NIA rl Primary Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hvdrofogy Indicators 2required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels Yes Saturated, Depth (in) Water -Stained Leaves X No: Water in borehole, Depth (in) >15 Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neural Test Assumed - Explain: Drift Lines Topographic Position Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: Flattened Vegetation Undetermined- Explain: Drainme patterns Remarks: above toe of slope; soils very dry 1 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM (ROUTINE DETERMINATION METHOD) Project Name/Job No.: goers Property/20051114 Date: August 18, 2005 Investigator(s): Westwood Prof. Services – Genevieve Bolting Cityrrwsp. Chanhassen Wetland Identification: Wetland C County & State Caver/MN Transect Sample Point: Flag C1 # of Flags: Cl -C20 VEGETATION SAMPLE POINT Wet side O upside ❑ MIA ❑ Common Name 113orninants t 20percent) Scientifk Name Stratum % Cover Ind. Status Spotted touch-me-not Impatiens ca ensis H 90 FACW Sandbar willow Salix exi.zua SST 100 OBL Saturated, Depth (in) >36 Water -Stained Leaves - No Water in borehole, Depth (in) X Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test X_ Assumed — two secondary Drift Lines X Topographic Position indicators % of Dominants FAC or wetter. 100 Remarks: Overall Dominant Vegetation/Community: See tants listed above/Type 6 — Shrub swam SAMPLE POINT W.t.1d. rl 11n eJA. n ure n HYDROLOGY SAMPLE POINT W., .id. IEt n...d. n uon n Primaty HydrologyHydrolqgy Indicators Common Name(Dominants 22opercent) Scientific Name Stratum %Cover Ind. Status Wetland Hydrology Present? Kentucky bluegrass Poo pratemis H 100 FAC - Oxidized Root Channels Box elder Acer negundo T 100 FAWC- Saturated, Depth (in) >36 Water -Stained Leaves - No Water in borehole, Depth (in) X Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test X_ Assumed — two secondary Drift Lines X Topographic Position indicators Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 100 Remarks: Overall Dominant Ve e[ation/Communi :See plants listed abovelWooded upland HYDROLOGY SAMPLE POINT W., .id. IEt n...d. n uon n Primaty HydrologyHydrolqgy Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators 2 required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels X_ Yes Saturated, Depth (in) >36 Water -Stained Leaves - No Water in borehole, Depth (in) X Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test X_ Assumed — two secondary Drift Lines X Topographic Position indicators Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: Flattened Vegetation Undetermined - Explain: Drainage nems Remarks: below toe of slope —11 SAMPLE POINT W.t.td. n u,..cd. W ute n Primary Hydroloay Indicators Secondary Hydralogy Indicators 2 required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels Yes Saturated, Depth (in) Water -Stained Leaves X No: Water in borehole, Depth (in) >15 Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test Assumed - Explain: Drift Lines Topographic Position Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: Flattened Vegetation Undetermined - Explain. Drain a Patterns Remarks: above toe of slope; soils very dry 1 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM (ROUTINE DETERMINATION METHOD) Project Name/Job No.: Goers Property/20051114 Date:August 18, 2005 Investigator(s): Westwood Prof. Services–Genevieve Bolling CityTTwsp. Chanhassen Wetland identification: Wetland D County & State Caver/MN Transect Sample Point: Flag D1 # of Flags: Dl -D19; Dal-Da21 X Topographic Position % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 0 VEGETATION SAMPLE POINT wet.M. n 1.—.4. n .tA n Common Name Dominants>_ 20 rcent Scientific Name Stratum %Cover Ind. Status Sugar male Acersacchamm T 100 FACU Common buckthorn Rhamnus cathartica S 100 FAC- Saturated, Depth (in) Water -Stained Leaves No Water in borehole, Depth (in) Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Other- Explain: Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neural Test Assumed – Drift Lines X Topographic Position % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 0 Remarks: Overall Dominant VSetation/Communi : See plants listed above/Wooded slo Undetermined - Explain: Drainage Patterns Remarks: below toe of slope % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 0 Remarks: Overall Dominant Vegetation/Community: Sandy channel, devoid of vegetation/ R4UBA —Temporarily flooded riverim s stem SAMPLE POINT Wneelde n 11—:.- n n Common Name Dominantst20 rcent Sc/entificName Stratum %Cover Ind. Status Sugar male Acersacchamm T 100 FACU Common buckthorn Rhamnus cathartica S 100 FAC- Saturated, Depth (in) Water -Stained Leaves No Water in borehole, Depth (in) Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Other- Explain: Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neural Test Assumed – Drift Lines X Topographic Position % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 0 Remarks: Overall Dominant VSetation/Communi : See plants listed above/Wooded slo HYDROLOGY SAMPI F POINT Primary Hydroloov Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators 2 required) Wetland Hydrology Present? X Inundated, Depth (in) 1 Oxidized Root Channels X_ Yes Saturated, Depth (in) Water -Stained Leaves No Water in borehole, Depth (in) Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Other- Explain: Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neural Test Assumed – Drift Lines X Topographic Position Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: Flattened Vegetation Undetermined - Explain: Drainage Patterns Remarks: below toe of slope 1 11 POINT Wetside ❑ Upside O NIA ❑ Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels Saturated, Depth (in) Water -Stained Leaves Water in borehole, Depth (in) >12 Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test Drift Lines Topographic Position Sediment Deposits Other- Explain: Flattened Vegetation Drain a Patterns Remarks: above toe of slope; soils 1 X No: Assumed - Explain: Undetermined - Explain: Westwood Professional Services, Inc. WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM (ROUTINE DETERMINATION METHOD) Project Name/Job No.: Goers Property/20051114 Date: August Investigator(s): Westwood Prof. Services—Genevieve Bolling City/Twsp. Chanhs Wetland Identification: Wetland E County & State Caver/f Transect Sample Point: Flag El # of Flags: E1 -E20 VEGETATION SAMPLE POINT wetside &l un Side n MIA n Common Name Dominants;' 20 rcent Sclentifle Name Stratum % Cover Ind. Status Reed canary grass Phalaris amndinacea H SO FAC RT_ River bulrush Scir uviatilis H 20 OBI. Bare soil 30 Saturated, Depth (in) >22 Water -Stained Leaves No Water in borehole, Depth (in) Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test X_ Assumed — two secondary Drift Lines X Topographic Position % of Dominants FAC or wetter. a Remarks: Overall Dominant Ve etation/Communi : Reed can s. River bulmsh/ T 2 — Wet meadow SAMPLF POINT w -.-.w., n n 1 HYDROLOGY SAMPLE POINT wee qid. rxl u„ mid. n MIA n Prima Hydrology Indicators Common Name Dominants 2 20percent) SclenHflc Name Stratum % Cover Ind. Status Wetland Hydrology Present? Soy beans Glycine maxima H 50 UPL Oxidized Root Channels Bare soil 30 Saturated, Depth (in) >22 Water -Stained Leaves No Water in borehole, Depth (in) Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test X_ Assumed — two secondary Drift Lines X Topographic Position indicators Sediment Deposits X Other - Explain: % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 0 Remarks: Overall Dominant Vegetation/Community: Planted soy beans HYDROLOGY SAMPLE POINT wee qid. rxl u„ mid. n MIA n Prima Hydrology Indicators SecondaryHydroio Indicators 2 required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels X_ Yes Saturated, Depth (in) >22 Water -Stained Leaves No Water in borehole, Depth (in) Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test X_ Assumed — two secondary Drift Lines X Topographic Position indicators Sediment Deposits X Other - Explain: Flattened Vegetation Undetermined - Explain: Drainage Patterns Remarks: below toe of slope; dominant plants are wetter than FACW SAMPLE POINT wet std. F1 un mid. n MIA n Primary Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators 2 required) Wetland H rology Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels Yes Saturated, Depth (in) Water -Stained Leaves X No: Water in borehole, Depth (in) >20 Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test Assumed - Explain: Drift Lines Topographic Position Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: Flattened Vegetation Undetermined - Explain: Draina a Patterns Remarks: above toe of slope; soils very dry 1 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM (ROUTINE DETERMINATION METHOD) Project Name/Job No.: Goers Property/20051114 Date: August 18, 2005 Investigator(s): Westwood Prof. Services — Genevieve Bolling Cityfrwsp. Chanhassen Wetland Identification: Wetland F County & State Caver/MN Transect Sample Point: Flag Fl # of Flags: FI -F9 Water Marks, Height (in) VEGETATION SAMPLE POINT wet side 9 Upside ❑ N/A ❑ Common Name Dominants 2:20 rce2 SclenNlic Name Stratum %Cover Ind. Status Black willow Salix nigra T 100 OBL % of Dominants FAC or wetter: 100 Remarks: Reed canary grass swale discharges into excavated basin Overall Dominant Vegetation/Community. Reed canary grass, black willow: T I — Seasonally flooded basin SAMPLE POINT Wet side Fl ti. id. rxl NIA rl Common Name Dominants i 20 rcentSclendf7c Name Stratum % Cover Ind. Status Kentucky blue grass Poe pratensis H 90 FAC- Wetland Hydrology Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels X_ Yes X Saturated, Depth (in) 5 Water -Stained Leaves No X Water in borehole, Depth (in) 9 Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test % of Dominants FAC or wetter. 0 Remarks: Overall Dominant Vegetation/Community: brome, and Canada goldert rod East: manicuried lawn; West: overgrown area dominated by sumac, box elder, sweet clover, smooth HYDROLOGY SAMPLE POINT wet side © Uoside Fl N/A r-1 Primary Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators 2 required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels X_ Yes X Saturated, Depth (in) 5 Water -Stained Leaves No X Water in borehole, Depth (in) 9 Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test Assumed - Explain: Drift Lines X Topographic Position Sediment Deposits Other - Explain: Flattened Vegetation Undetermined - Explain: Drainage Patterns Remarks: below toe of slope SAMPLE POINT wet side ❑ up side O NIA ❑ Primary Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators 2 required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Inundated, Depth (in) Oxidized Root Channels Yes Saturated, Depth (in) >15 Water -Stained Leaves X_ No: Water in borehole, Depth (in) Mapped Hydric Soil, Depression Water Marks, Height (in) FAC -Neutral Test Assumed - Explain: Drift Lines Topographic Position Sediment Deposits Other- Explain: Flattened Vegetation I Undetermined - Explain: Drainage Patterns Remarks: above toe of slope 1 Westwood Professional Services, Inc PLANNING •ENGINEERING SURVEYING ". TRANSMITTAL 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 951-937-5150 Fax: 952-937-5822 Toll free: 1-888-937-5150 E-mail: wps@westwoodps.com Date: September 14, 2005 TWIN CITIESM1ET00 ST. CLOUD To: Lori Haak 13"INERD City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 rnC RECEIVED Chanhassen, MN 55317 SEP 15 2005 From: Genevieve Bolling CITY OF CHANHASSEN Regarding: Goers Property Proj. No.: 20051114.00 Items: No Description 1 Goers Property Wetland Delineation Report Purpose: For your approval Remarks: Westwood requests that the City of Chanhassen as the Local Governmental Unit (LGU) provide written confirmation that the delineated wetland boundaries shown on the attached Wetland Boundary Map are acceptable for local administration of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Gen Delivery: Mail Copy to: Mr. Nathan Franzen, Plowshares Development, LLC Mr. Chris Moehd, Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Designing the Frture Today -since 1972 Non -Scannable Item 10/ N /v5_ Folder Number Folder Name �oPLL �C- Job Number 2S22� Box Number DO � 3 X1.1 v '• eT a�f o :ap!1 CITY OF CWVYNASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952227.1190 Engineering Plane: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Cooper Boulevard Phone: 952.227.14W Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning 6 Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Plane: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952n7.1 110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us April 14, 2006 Mr. Nathan Franzen Plowshares Development, Inc. 1851 Lake Drive West, Suite 550 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Nathan: This letter is to formally notify you that on April 10, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council adopted the following motion: "The City Council grants final plat approval of Planning Case #05-37 for Stonefield for 30 lots and 1 outlot with a right-of-way width variance, as shown on the plans stamped `Received March 1, 2006', subject to the following conditions: The proposed enlargement of the existing stormwater pond must be designed to meet the City's minimum standards and coordinated and approved by the City Water Resources Coordinator. 2. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations have been submitted for staff's review and some minor revisions are still needed. 3. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood level. 4. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health, Carver County and the Williams Pipe Line Company. 5. The developer must obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. 6. On the utility plan: a. Add a note: All water services must be (1 ") Type K copper. b. Extend the storm sewer further to the south along the proposed Stonfield Lane to the end of the temporary cul-de-sac. c. All backyard catch basins must be built per City Detail Plate No. 3103. d. Add a catch basin at the north east comer of Lot 1, Block 4 along Osprey Lane or proposed Stonfield Lane. scmNeo The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. 0 0 Plowshares Development, Inc. Stonefield April 14, 2006 Page 2 7. On the grading plan: 3 a a. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registere and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. In ac encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a The underlying property has not been assessed sewer or water improveme and watermain hook-up fees are collectable with building permit issuance at me rates in effect at the time of application. The 2006 trunk hook-up charge is $1,575.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,625.00 per unit. The party applying for the permit is responsible for payments of these hook-up charges, or the fees can be specially assessed against the parcel. 10. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 11. Any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. 12. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. . 13. The developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and construction of the lift station and forcemain and any associated costs. 14. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 15. Revise the plans to show street lights every 300 feet, a stop sign at the street intersection and a sign at the cul-de-sac. The sign at the cul-de-sac shall read: "Temporary cul-de-sac. This roadway will be extended in the future." 16. City Forester's Conditions: a. A minimum of two overstory trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. b. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. c. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. e,«Aoa 0 0 Plowshares Development, Inc. Stonefield April 14, 2006 Page 3 d. Tree preservation on site shall be according to tree preservation plans dated 10/14/05. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 17. In the absence of parkland dedication, it is recommended that Stonefield pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final platting. At today's rate, these fees would total $174,000 (30 lots x $5,800). Additionally, the applicant is required to construct the neighborhood asphalt trail connector to the property line as depicted on their preliminary plan submittals. 18. Water Resource Coordinator's Conditions: a. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetland D on Lots 8-10, Block 3. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs on Lots 8-10, Block 3 under the direction of City staff before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. b. All structures on Lots 8-10, Block 3 shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. c. A temporary basin shall be constructed in the vicinity of Lots 6 and 7, Block 3. The temporary sediment basin shall be installed prior to disturbing upslope area. A temporary perforated riser and stable emergency overflow (EOF) for the basin shall be installed; details shall be included in the plan. The basin shall be properly sized for the watershed area, according to NPDES requirements (i.e. The basins must provide storage below the outlet pipe for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2 -year, 24-hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shall the basin provide less than 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe from each acre drained to the basin). d. Curbside inlet controls are needed; Wimco type or ESS type (or approved similar protection) inlet controls shall be used. Curbside inlet protection shall be provided for existing inlets adjacent to the site exit on Osprey Lane. City standard inlet protection details 5302 and 5302A shall be included in the plans. The proposed rear yard catch basin protection shall be revised; Wimco type, ESS type or equal must be used. The proposed silt fence shall be installed with additional rock around Chanhassen type 1 silt fence. e. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Tvce of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days 0 0 Plowshares Development, Inc. Stonefield April 14, 2006 Page 4 These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. f. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. g. The developer shall abide by the agreement for Storm Water Facilities Improvements dated March 1, 2006, executed by the developer and the City of Chanhassen. The total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is $59,299. 19. Fire Marshall Conditions: a. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be either removed from site or chipped. b. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. c. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. d. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. e. Fire hydrant spacing is acceptable. 20. Building Official Conditions: a. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. b. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. c. Separate sewer and water services must be provided to each lot. 21. The retaining walls shall be maintained by a Homeowners Association. 0 0 Plowshares Development, Inc. Stonefield April 14, 2006 Page 5 22. The City shall not be responsible for maintenance of storm water infrastructure on Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block 3. 23. In the event that the regional pond project is not constructed, the applicant has proposed the installation of a second outlet structure on Pond A. In that event, the existing outlet structure that is failing must also be replaced. The cost of a new outlet structure to replace the existing failing structure would be bome by the City, but the replacement would be done by the applicant. 24. The developer shall pay the $22,380.00 Arterial Collector Fee. 25. Approval of the final plat is contingent upon approval of final construction plans/specifications for the project along with the developer entering into a development contract with the City and supplying the necessary financial security and fees. 26. Due to the amount of fill required to reconstruct the section of Osprey Lane that abuts the Stonefield development, Osprey Lane must be closed to traffic for a period of time this summer. The City authorizes the closure of Osprey Lane from May 1, 2006 until July 31, 2006. The developer must notify in writing all properties within 500 feet of the development to inform the residents of the upcoming closure, the detour route and why the closure is necessary by April 17, 2006. "Road Closed" and detour signs must be posted a minimum of 10 days before the closure. Requests to extend the time of closure must be submitted in writing to the City Engineer for consideration. 27. The frontage on Lot 2, Block 1, shall be corrected to reflect 90 feet." Two mylar copies of the final plat should be submitted to our office for signatures, along with a signed development contract (copy enclosed) and all required financial securities. Two 1"=200' scale mylar reductions of the final plat, and digital file of final plat in both .dxf & .tif format (the Axf file must be tied to the current county coordinate system) should also be submitted. Also, all easements must be signed and submitted to the City prior to recording. If you have any questions, please call me at (952) 227-1134 or e-mail me at saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincerely, J Sharmeen Al-Jaff Senior Planner c: Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Jerry Mohn, Acting Building Official Enclosure: Development Contract pplan\2005 planning cases\05-37 stonefield (goers property)Viinal plat letter of appmo Ldoc 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA STONEFIELD DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) 0 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS SPECIAL PROVISIONS PAGE 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL............................................................................SP-1 RIGHT TO PROCEED .................................................................................................GC-1 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL........................................................................SP-1 2. 3. DEVELOPMENT PLANS............................................................................................SP-1 4. IMPROVEMENTS........................................................................................................SP-2 PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS................................................................................GC-1 5. TIME OF PERFORMANCE.........................................................................................SP-2 4. 6. SECURrI Y....................................................................................................................SP-2 7. NOTICE.........................................................................................................................SP-3 IMPRO VEMIIdTS....................................................................................................... 8. OTHER SPECIAL CONDITIONS................................................................................SP-3 6. 9. GENERAL CONDMONS............................................................................................SP-8 GENERAL . CONDMONS 1. RIGHT TO PROCEED .................................................................................................GC-1 2. PHASED DEVELOPMENT.........................................................................................GC-1 3. PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS................................................................................GC-1 4. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS......................................................................GC-1 5. IMPRO VEMIIdTS....................................................................................................... GC -1 6. IRON MONUMENTS..................................................................................................GC-2 7. LICENSE......................................................................................................................GC-2 8. SITE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL.........................................................GC-2 8A. EROSION CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION OF A DWELLING OR OTHER BUILDING...................................................................................GC-2 9. CLEAN UP...................................................................................................................GC-3 10. ACCEPTANCE AND OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS....................................GC-3 11. CLAIMS........................................................................................................................GC-3 12. PARK DEDICATION..................................................................................................GC-3 13. LANDSCAPING..........................................................................................................GC-3 14. WARRANTY...............................................................................................................GC-4 15. LOT PLANS.................................................................................................................GC-4 16. EXISTING ASSESSMENTS.......................................................................................GC-4 17. HOOK-UP CHARGES.................................................................................................GC-4 18. PUBLIC STREET LIGHTING.....................................................................................GC-4 19. SIGNAGE.....................................................................................................................GC-5 20. HOUSEPADS..............................................................................................................GC-5 21. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS.................................................................................GC-5 22. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT.........................................................................................GC-6 22. MISCELLANEOUS A. Construction Trailers........................................................................................GC-6 B. Postal Service....................................................................................................GC-7 C. Third Parties......................................................................................................GC-7 D. Breach of Contract............................................................................................GC-7 i E. Severability.......................................................................................................GC-7 F. Building Permits...............................................................................................GC-7 G. Waivers/Amendments.......................................................................................GC-7 H. Release..............................................................................................................GC-7 I. Insurance........................................................................................................... GC -7 J. Remedies...........................................................................................................GC-8 K. Assignability.....................................................................................................GC-8 L. Construction Hours...........................................................................................GC-8 M. Noise Amplification..........................................................................................GC-8 N. Access...............................................................................................................GC-8 O. Street Maintenance............................................................................................GC-8 P. Storm Sewer Maintenance................................................................................GC-9 Q. Soil Treatment Systems....................................................................................GC-9 R. Variances...........................................................................................................GC-9 S. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations......................................GC-9 T. Proof of Title.....................................................................................................GC-9 U. Soil Conditions.................................................................................................GC-9 V. Soil Correction................................................................................................GC-10 W. Haul Routes.........................................................................................................GC-10 X. Development Signs..............................................................................................GC-10 Y. Construction Plans...............................................................................................GC-10 Z. As -Built Lot Surveys...........................................................................................GC-10 ii 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) STONEFIELD SPECIAL PROVISIONS AGREEMENT dated April 10, 2006 by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and, PLOWESHARES DEVELOPMENT, INC., a limited liability company (the 'Developer"). 1. Request for Plat Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for Stonefield (referred to in this Contract as the "plat'). The land is legally described on the attached Exhibit "A". 2. Conditions of Plat Approval. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the plat with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 30 days after the City Council approves the plat. 3. Development Plans. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. With the exception of Plan A, the plans may be prepared, subject to City approval, after entering the Contract, but before commencement of any work in the plat. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A: Final plat approved April 10, 2006, prepared by Westwood Professional Services. Plan B: Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan dated February 7, 2006, prepared by Westwood Professional Services. Plan C: Plans and Specifications for Improvements dated March 1, 2006, prepared by Westwood Professional Services. Plan D: Landscape Plan dated March 1, 2006, prepared by Westwood Professional Services. SP -1 0 0 4. Improvements. The Developer shall install and pay for the following: A. Sanitary Sewer System B. Water System C. Storm Water Drainage System D. Streets E. Concrete Curb and Gutter F. Street Lights G. Site Grading/Restoration H. Underground Utilities (e.g. gas, electric, telephone, CATV) I. Setting of Lot and Block Monuments J. Surveying and Staking K. Landscaping L. Erosion Control 5. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required improvements by November 15, 2006 except the Street Wear Course layer will be installed by November 15, 2007. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City Engineer. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 6. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Contract, payment of special assessments, payment of the costs of all public improvements, and construction of all public improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit in the form attached hereto, from a bank acceptable to the City, or cash escrow ("security") for $981,805.21. The amount of the security was calculated as of the following: Site Grading/ Erosion control /Restoration (already collected LOC) $ 216,339.61 Sanitary Sewer $ 213,793.60 Watermain $ 88,634.00 Storm Sewer, Drainage System, including cleaning and maintenance $ 160.505.00 Streets $ 288.465.85 Street lights and signs $ 11.000.00 Engineering, surveying, and inspection $ 56.000.00 Landscaping $ 54,484.50 TOTAL COST OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS $1,089,22256 AMOUNT OF SECURITY CALCULATED AS (110% TOTAL) $1,198,144.82 AMOUNT COLLECTED - $216,339.61 NET CASH ESCROW $981,805.21 SP -2 0 0 This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The security shall be subject to the approval of the City. The City may draw down the security, without notice, for any violation of the terms of this Contract. If the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the draw shall be used to cure the default. With City approval, the security may be reduced from time to time as financial obligations are paid, but in no case shall the security be reduced to a point less than 10% of the original amount until (1) all improvements have been completed, (2) iron monuments for lot corners have been installed, (3) all financial obligations to the City satisfied, (4) the required "record" plans have been received by the City, (5) a warranty security is provided, and (6) the public improvements are accepted by the City. 7. Notice. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: Todd Simning PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT INC. 1851 lake Drive West Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: 952-361-0832 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. & Other Special Conditions. A. SECURITIES AND FEES 1. A $981,805.21 letter of credit or escrow for the developer -installed improvements, the $282,930.76 cash administration fee and the fully -executed development contract must be submitted and shall be submitted prior to scheduling a pre -construction meeting. 2. The applicant shall pay the total of $59,299.00 SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording. 3. $216,339.61 is the developer's estimate for the Site Grading/ Erosion Control/Restoration which has been already collected with the regional storm water pond letter of credit. B. The proposed enlargement of the existing stormwater pond must be designed to meet the City's minimum standards and coordinated and approved by the City Water Resources Coordinator. SP -3 0 0 C. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations have been submitted for staff's review and some minor revisions are still needed. D. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood level. E. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health, Carver County and the Williams Pipe Line Company. F. The developer must obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. G. On the utility plan: 1. Add a note: All water services must be (1 ") Type K copper. 2. Extend the storm sewer further to the south along the proposed Stonefield Lane to the end of the temporary cul-de-sac. 3. All backyard catch basins must be built per City Detail Plate No. 3103. 4. Add a catch basin at the north east corner of Lot 1, Block 4 along Osprey Lane or proposed Stonefield Lane. H. On the grading plan, show the benchmark used for the site survey. I. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. In addition, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. J. The underlying property has not been assessed sewer or water hookup fees. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees are collectible with building permit issuance at the rates in effect at time of application. The 2006 trunk hookup charge is $1,575.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,625.00 per unit. The party applying for the permit is responsible for payment of these hookup charges, or the fees can be specially assessed against the parcel. K. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. SPA L. Any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. M. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. . N. The developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and construction of the lift station and forcemain and any associated costs. O. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. P. Revise the plans to show street lights every 300 feet, a stop sign at the street intersection and a sign at the cul-de-sac. The sign at the cul-de-sac shall read: "Femporary cul-de-sac. This roadway will be extended in the future." Q. City Forester's Conditions: 1. A minimum of two overstory trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. 2. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. 3. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. 4. Tree preservation on site shall be according to tree preservation plans dated 10/14/05. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. R. In the absence of parkland dedication, it is recommended that Stonefield pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final platting. At today's rate, these fees would total $174,000 (30 lots x $5,800). Additionally, the applicant is required to construct the neighborhood asphalt trail connector to the property line as depicted on their preliminary plan submittals. S. Water Resource Coordinator's Conditions: 1. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetland D on Lots 8-10, Block 3. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install SP -5 wetland buffer edge signs on Lots 8-10, Block 3 under the direction of City staff before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. 2. All structures on Lots 8-10, Block 3 shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. 3. A temporary basin shall be constructed in the vicinity of Lots 6 and 7, Block 3. The temporary sediment basin shall be installed prior to disturbing upslope area. A temporary perforated riser and stable emergency overflow (EOF) for the basin shall be installed; details shall be included in the plan. The basin shall be properly sized for the watershed area, according to NPDES requirements (i.e. The basins must provide storage below the outlet pipe for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2 -year, 24-hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shall the basin provide less than 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe from each acre drained to the basin). 4. Curbside inlet controls are needed; Wimco type or ESS type (or approved similar protection) inlet controls shall be used. Curbside inlet protection shall be provided for existing inlets adjacent to the site exit on Osprey Lane. City standard inlet protection details 5302 and 5302A shall be included in the plans. The proposed rear yard catch basin protection shall be revised; Wimco type, ESS type or equal must be used. The proposed silt fence shall be installed with additional rock around Chanhassen type 1 silt fence. 5. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: ape of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 6. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. T. Fire Marshall Conditions: 1. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be either removed from site or chipped. gZ61 0 0 2. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. 3. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. 4. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 5. Fire hydrant spacing is acceptable. U. Building Official Conditions: 1. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. 2. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. 3. Separate sewer and water services must be provided to each lot. V. The retaining walls shall be maintained by a Homeowners Association. W. The City shall not be responsible for maintenance of storm water infrastructure on Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block 3. X. In the event that the regional pond project is not constructed, the applicant has proposed the installation of a second outlet structure on Pond A. In that event, the existing outlet structure that is failing must also be replaced. The cost of a new outlet structure to replace the existing failing structure would be home by the City, but the replacement would be done by the applicant. Y. On September 29, 2005, City Council approved the Arterial Collector Fee. The proceeds of this will fund the construction of Arterial Collectors within the City. The developer has negotiated a $2,000/acre rate for this project, therefore the fee is: 11.19 acres developable area x $2,000/acre = $22,380.00. SP -7 Z. Approval of the final plat is contingent upon approval of final construction planstspecifications for the project along with the developer entering into a development contract with the City and supplying the necessary financial security and fees. AA. Due to the amount of fill required to reconstruct the section of Osprey Lane that abuts the Stonefield development, Osprey Lane must be closed to traffic for a period of time this summer. The City authorizes the closure of Osprey Lane from May 1, 2006 until July 31, 2006. The developer must notify in writing all properties within 500 feet of the development to inform the residents of the upcoming closure, the detour route and why the closure is necessary by April 17, 2006. "Road Closed" and detour signs must be posted a minimum of 10 days before the closure. Requests to extend the time of closure must be submitted in writing to the City Engineer for consideration. BB. The frontage on Lot 2, Block 1, shall be corrected to reflect 90 feet." 9. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Contract are attached as Exhibit 'B" and incorporated herein. am. CITY OF CHANHASSEN In (SEAL) Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Todd Gerhardt, City Manager PLOWESHARES DEVELOPMENT, INC. F -W STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) Todd Simning, President The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 2006, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2006, by Todd Simning, President of PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT INC. on behalf of the company. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 0 EXHIBIT "All TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the following described line and its northerly and southerly extensions; Commencing at the Southeast comer of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 04 minutes 49 seconds West, bearing assumed, along the South line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 790.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 1 degree 57 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of 460.00 feet; thence North 18 degrees 32 minutes 33 seconds East, a distance of 330.00 feet; thence North 52 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 638.57 feet; thence North I degree 57 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of 150.59 feet to a point on the North line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter distant 156.07 feet Easterly of the Northwest comer of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter as measured along said North line and there terminating. Vi 111 That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, described as follows, to -wit: The north 375.00 feet lying Westerly of the following described lice, to -wit: Beginning at a point in the North line of said Southwest Quarter of Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) distant 849.31 feet West of the Northeast corer thereof; thence Southwesterly deflecting 64 degrees 42 minutes 04 seconds from West to South from said North line, a distance of 163.19 feet; thence Southerly deflecting to the left 32 degrees 35 minutes 37 seconds a distance of 125.62 feet; thence Southwesterly deflecting to the right 22 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds a distance of 302.23 feet; thence Southerly to the northwest comer of the East 290.75 feet of the West 484.2 feet of the South 539.7 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) as measured along the West and East lines of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4); thence South parallel with the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter to the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) and there terminating, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota. Outlot A, Shenandoah Ridge, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota. Abstract. SP -10 0 9 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this day of 20_. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20_, by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 0 0 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. _ Date: TO: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Sir or Madam We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ , available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. dated 2L--, of (Name of Bank) , b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Manager of the City of Chanhassen. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2 This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Chanhassen City Manager that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Chanhassen City Manager, Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 500. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. Fn Its 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) EXHIBIT "B" LPID11:101 I 1 1 1 1. Right to Proceed. Within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, 3) the plat has been recorded with the County Recorders Office or Registrar of Title's Office of the County where the plat is located, and 4) the City Engineer has issued a letter that the foregoing conditions have been satisfied and then the Developer may proceed. 2. Phased Development. If the plat is a phase of a multiphased preliminary plat, the City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent phases if the Developer has breached this Contract and the breach has not been remedied. Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until Development Contracts for such phases are approved by the City. Park charges and area charges for sewer and water referred to in this Contract are not being imposed on outlots, if any, in the plat that are designated in an approved preliminary plat for future subdivision into lots and blocks. Such charges will be calculated and imposed when the outlots are final platted into lots and blocks. 3. Preliminary Plat Status. If the plat is a phase of a multi -phased preliminary plat, the preliminary plat approval for all phases not final platted shall lapse and be void unless final platted into lots and blocks, not outlots, within two (2) years after preliminary plat approval. 4. Changes in Official Controls. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service area, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 5. Improvements. The improvements specified in the Special Provisions of this Contract shall be installed in accordance with City standards, ordinances, and plans and specifications which have been prepared and signed by a competent registered professional GC -1 0 0 engineer furnished to the City and approved by the City Engineer. The Developer shall obtain all necessary permits from the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services and other pertinent agencies before proceeding with construction. The City will, at the Developers expense, have one or more construction inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The Developer shall also provide a qualified inspector to perform site inspections on a daily basis. Inspector qualifications shall be submitted in writing to the City Engineer. The Developer shall instruct its project engineer/inspector to respond to questions from the City Inspector(s) and to make periodic site visits to satisfy that the construction is being performed to an acceptable level of quality in accordance with the engineer's design. The Developer or his engineer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. 6. Iron Monuments. Before the security for the completion of utilities is released, all monuments must be correctly placed in the ground in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 505.02, Subd. 1. The Developer's surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 7. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. S. Site Erosion and Sediment Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any utility construction is commenced or building permits are issued, the erosion and sediment control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion and sediment control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion and sediment control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion and sediment transport. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion and sediment control plan and schedule of supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion and sediment transport at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developers and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the plat is in full compliance with the erosion and sediment control requirements. Erosion and sediment control needs to be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored, even if construction has been completed and accepted. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion and sediment control, the City will authorize the removal of the erosion and sediment control, i.e. hay bales and silt fence. The Developer shall remove and dispose of the erosion and sediment control measures. GC -2 0 0 8a. Erosion Control During Construction of a Dwelling or Other Building. Before a building permit is issued for construction of a dwelling or other building on a lot, a $500.00 cash escrow or letter of credit per lot shall also be famished to the City to guarantee compliance with City Code § 7-22. 9. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 10. Acceptance and Ownership of Improvements. Upon completion and acceptance by the City of the work and construction required by this Contract, the improvements lying within public easements shall become City property. After completion of the improvements, a representative of the contractor, and a representative of the Developer's engineer will make a final inspection of the work with the City Engineer. Before the City accepts the improvements, the City Engineer shall be satisfied that all work is satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and the Developer and his engineer shall submit a written statement to the City Engineer certifying that the project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. The appropriate contractor waivers shall also be provided. Final acceptance of the public improvements shall be by City Council resolution. 11. Claims. In the event that the City receives claims from laborers, materialmen, or others that work required by this Contract has been performed, the sums due them have not been paid, and the laborers, materialmen, or others are seeking payment out of the financial guarantees posted with the City, and if the claims are not resolved at least ninety (90) days before the security required by this Contract will expire, the Developer hereby authorizes the City to commence an Interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22, Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts, to draw upon the letters of credit in an amount up to 125% of the claim(s) and deposit the funds in compliance with the Rule, and upon such deposit, the Developer shall release, discharge, and dismiss the City from any further proceedings as it pertains to the letters of credit deposited with the District Court, except that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine attomeys' fees. 12. Park Dedication. The Developer shall pay full park dedication fees in conjunction with the installation of the plat improvements. The park dedication fees shall be the current amount in force at the time of final platting pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinances and City Council resolutions. 13. Landscaping. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with Plan D. Unless otherwise approved by the City, trees not listed in the City's approved tree list are prohibited. The minimum tree size shall be two and one-half (21h) inches caliper, either bare root in season, or balled and burlapped. The trees may not be planted in the boulevard (area between curb and property line). In addition to any sod required as a part of the erosion and sediment control plan, Plan B, the Developer or lot purchaser shall sod the boulevard area and all drainage ways on each lot utilizing a minimum of four (4) inches of topsoil as a base. Seed or sod shall also be placed on all disturbed areas of the lot. If these improvements are not in place at the time a certificate of GC -3 0 occupancy is requested, a financial guarantee of $750.00 in the form of cash or letter of credit shall be provided to the City. These conditions must then be complied with within two (2) months after the certificate of occupancy issued, except that if the certificate of occupancy is issued between October 1 through May 1 these conditions must be complied with by the following July 1st. Upon expiration of the time period, inspections will be conducted by City staff to verify satisfactory completion of all conditions. City staff will conduct inspections of incomplete items with a $50.00 inspection fee deducted from the escrow fund for each inspection. After satisfactory inspection, the financial guarantee shall be returned. If the requirements are not satisfied, the City may use the security to satisfy the requirements. The City may also use the escrowed funds for maintenance of erosion control pursuant to City Code Section 7-22 or to satisfy any other requirements of this Contract or of City ordinances. These requirements supplement, but do not replace, specific landscaping conditions that may have been required by the City Council for project approval. 14. Warranty. The Developer wan -ants all improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The Developer shall submit either 1) a warranty/maintenance bond for 100% of the cost of the improvement, or 2) a letter of credit for twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount of the original cost of the improvements. A. The required warranty period for materials and workmanship for the utility contractor installing public sewer and water mains shall be two (2) years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. B. The required warranty period for all work relating to street construction, including concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, materials and equipment shall be subject to two (2) years from the date of final written acceptance. C. The required warranty period for sod, trees, and landscaping is one full growing season following acceptance by the City. 15. Lot Plans. Prior to the issuance of building permits, an acceptable Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control including silt fences, and Tree Removal Plan shall be submitted for each lot for review and approval by the City Engineer. Each plan shall assure that drainage is maintained away from buildings and that tree removal is consistent with development plans and City Ordinance. 16. Existing Assessments. Any existing assessments against the plat will be re -spread against the plat in accordance with City standards. 17. Hook-up Charges. The Developer also acknowledges overall sanitary sewer and water trunk availability to the site and the hook-up charges established by the City as reasonable compensation for oversizing costs previously incurred, as well as, long-term maintenance. Said hook-up charges are collectible at time of building permit unless a written request is made to assess GC -4 0 0 the costs over a four year term at the rates in effect at time of application. If paid with the building permit, the party applying for the building permit is responsible for payment of these fees. 18. Public Street Lighting. The Developer shall have installed and pay for public street lights in accordance with City standards. The public street lights shall be accepted for City ownership and maintenance at the same time that the public street is accepted for ownership and maintenance. A plan shall be submitted for the City Engineers approval prior to the installation. Before the City signs the final plat, the Developer shall pay the City a fee of $300.00 for each street light installed in the plat. The fee shall be used by the City for furnishing electricity and maintaining each public street light for twenty (20) months. 19. Signage. All street signs, traffic signs, and wetland monumentation required by the City as a part of the plat shall be furnished and installed by the City at the sole expense of the Developer. 20. House Pads. The Developer shall promptly fumish the City "as -built" plans indicating the amount, type and limits of fill on any house pad location. 21. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall pay an administrative fee in conjunction with the installation of the plat improvements. This fee is to cover the cost of City Staff time and overhead for items such as review of construction documents, preparation of the Development Contract, monitoring construction progress, processing pay requests, processing security reductions, and final acceptance of improvements. This fee does not cover the City's cost for construction inspections. The fee shall be calculated as follows: i) If the cost of the construction of public improvements is less than $500,000, three percent (3%) of construction costs; If the cost of the construction of public improvements is between $500,000 and $1,000,000, three percent (3%) of construction costs for the first $500,000 and two percent (2%) of construction costs over $500,000; If the cost of the construction of public improvements is over $1,000,000, two and one-half percent (21/2%) of construction costs for the first $1,000,000 and one and one-half percent (llh%) of construction costs over $1,000,000. Before the City signs the final plat, the Developer shall deposit with the City a fee based upon construction estimates. After construction is completed, the final fee shall be determined based upon actual construction costs. The cost of public improvements is defined in paragraph 6 of the Special Provisions. GC -5 0 0 B. In addition to the administrative fee, the Developer shall reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City for providing construction and erosion and sediment control inspections. This cost will be periodically billed directly to the Developer based on the actual progress of the construction. Payment shall be due in accordance with Article 21E of this Agreement. C. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attomeys' fees. D. In addition to the administrative fee, the Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including engineering and attomeys' fees. E. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and construction, including but not limited to the issuance of building permits for lots which the Developer may or may not have sold, until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as, but not limited to, sewer availability charges ("SAC"), City water connection charges, City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees. G. Private Utilities. The Developer shall have installed and pay for the installation of electrical, natural gas, telephone, and cable television service in conjunction with the overall development improvements. These services shall be provided in accordance with each of the respective franchise agreements held with the City. H. The developer shall pay the City a fee established by City Council resolution, to reimburse the City for the cost of updating the City's base maps, GIS data base files, and converting the plat and record drawings into an electronic format. Record drawings must be submitted within four months of final acceptance of public utilities. All digital information submitted to the City shall be in the Carver County Coordinate system. 22. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for GC -6 0 0 permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 23. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on-site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer as a part of the pre -construction meeting for installation of public improvements. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the acceptance of the public improvements unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. The City is not a guarantor of the Developer's obligations under this Contract. The City shall have no responsibility or liability to lot purchasers or others for the City's failure to enforce this Contract or for allowing deviations from it. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties. The City may also issue a stop work order halting all plat development until the breach has been cured and the City has received satisfactory assurance that the breach will not reoccur. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Building Permits. Building permits will not be issued in the plat until sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer have been installed, tested, and accepted by the City, and the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the site graded and revegetated in accordance with Plan B of the development plans. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Release. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Contract, at the Developers request the City Manager will issue a Certificate of Compliance. Prior to the issuance of such a certificate, individual lot owners may make as written request for a certificate applicable to an individual lot allowing a minimum of ten (10) days for processing. GC -7 0 0 I. Insurance. Developer shall take out and maintain until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $500,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The certificate may not contain any disclaimer for failure to give the required notice. J. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, expressed or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. K. Assi agn bility. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it. L. Construction Hours. Construction hours for required improvements under this contract shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Under emergency conditions, this limitation may be waived by the consent of the City Engineer. Any approved work performed after dark shall be adequately illuminated. If construction occurs outside of the permitted construction hours, the Developer shall pay the following administrative penalties: First violation Second violation Third & subsequent violations $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 All site development and construction must cease for seven (7) calendar days M. Noise Amplification. The use of outdoor loudspeakers, bullhoms, intercoms, and similar devices is prohibited in conjunction with the construction of homes, buildings, and the improvements required under this contract. The administrative penalty for violation of construction hours shall also apply to violation of the provisions in this paragraph. N. Access. All access to the plat prior to the City accepting the roadway improvements shall be the responsibility of the Developer regardless if the City has issued building Permits or occupancy permits for lots within the plat. 0 0 O. Street Maintenance. The Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until streets within the plat are accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed by the Developer when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and directing attention to detours. If streets become impassable, the City may order that such streets shall be barricaded and closed. The Developer shall maintain a smooth roadway surface and provide proper surface drainage. The Developer may request, in writing, that the City plow snow on the streets prior to final acceptance of the streets. The City shall have complete discretion to approve or reject the request. The City shall not be responsible for reshaping or damage to the street base or utilities because of snow plowing operations. The provision of City snow plowing service does not constitute final acceptance of the streets by the City. P. Storm Sewer Maintenance. The Developer shall be responsible for cleaning and maintenance of the storm sewer system (including ponds, pipes, catch basins, culverts and swales) within the plat and the adjacent off-site storm sewer system that receives storm water from the plat. The Developer shall follow all instructions it receives from the City concerning the cleaning and maintenance of the storm sewer system. The Developer's obligations under this paragraph shall end two (2) years after the public street and storm drainage improvements in the plat have been accepted by the City. Twenty percent (20%) of the storm sewer costs, shown under section 6 of the special provisions of this contract, will be held by the City for the duration of the 2 -year maintenance period. Q. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are fust provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the platting process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. R. Variances. By approving the plat, the Developer represents that all lots in the plat are buildable without the need for variances from the City's ordinances. S. Compliance with Laws. Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the plat the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District(s); 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. Csi�9 0 0 T. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers to enter into this Development Contract. U. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. V. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. On lots which have no fill material a soils report from a qualified soils engineer is not required unless the City's building inspection department determines from observation that there may be a soils problem. On lots with fill material that have been mass graded as part of a multi -lot grading project, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City issues a building permit for the lot. On lots with fill material that have been custom graded, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City inspects the foundation for a building on the lot. W. Haul Routes. The Developer, the Developer's contractors or subcontractors must submit proposed haul routes for the import or export of soil, construction material, construction equipment or construction debris, or any other purpose. All haul routes must be approved by the City Engineer X. Development Signs. The Developer shall post a six foot by eight foot development sign in accordance with City Detail Plate No. 5313 at each entrance to the project. The sign shall be in place before construction of the required improvements commences and shall be removed when the required improvements are completed, except for the final lift of asphalt on streets. The signs shall contain the following information: project name, name of developer, developer's telephone number and designated contact person, allowed construction hours. Y. Construction Plans_ Upon final plat approval, the developer shall provide the City with two complete sets of full-size construction plans and four sets of 11"x17" reduced construction plan sets and three sets of specifications. Within four months after the completion of the utility improvements and base course pavement and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with the following: (1) a complete set of reproducible Mylar as -built plans, (2) two complete full-size sets of blue linelpaper as -built plans, (3) two complete sets of utility tie sheets, (4) location of buried fabric used for soil stabilization, (5) location stationing and swing ties of all utility stubs including draintile cleanouts, (6) bench mark network, (7) digital GC -10 0 0 file of as -built plans in both Axf & .tif format (the .dxf file must be tied to the current county coordinate system), (8) digital file of utility tie sheets in either .doc or .tif format, and (9) a breakdown of lineal footage of all utilities installed, including the per lineal foot bid price. The Developer is required to submit the final plat in electronic format. Z. As -Built Lot Surveys. An as -built lot survey will be required on all lots prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued. The as -built lot survey must be prepared, signed, and dated by a Registered Land Surveyor. Sod and the bituminous driveways must be installed before the as -built survey is completed. If the weather conditions at the time of the as -built are not conducive to paving the driveway and/or installing sod, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued and the as -built escrow withheld until all work is complete. Rev. 12/27/05 • • os - 3"1 City Council Meeting — April 10, 2006 Lundquist moved, Tjornhom seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: a. Approval of Minutes: -City Council Summary and Verbatim Minutes dated March 13, 2006 -City Council Work Session Minutes dated March 20, 2006 -City Council Summary and Verbatim Minutes dated March 20, 2006 b. Resolution #2006-23: 2005 MUSA Improvements, Bid Package #2, Project 06-05: Approve Plans & Specifications, Authorize Ad for Bids. C. Longacres Stormwater Pond Improvements, Project 06-09 & Lyman Boulevard Sewer Repairs, Project 06-08: Approve Consultant Contract. d. Stonefield, 1601 Lyman Boulevard, Applicant Plowshares: 1) Final Plat Approval as amended by staff. 2) Approve Plans & Specifications, Development Contract, Project 06-07 as amended. e. Gateway North, Northwest Intersection of the Future Alignment of Highways 101 and 212, Applicant Sand Companies: 1) Final Plat Approval. 2) Approve Plans & Specifications, Development Contract, Project 06-10. f. Resolution #2006-24: East Water Treatment Plant, Project 04-08-4: Approve Quote with CenturyTel for Fiber Optic Installation. g. Lake Susan Park Playground Poured -in -Place Resilient Surfacing Project: Award of Bid. h. 2006 Fireworks Contract: Award of Bid. j. Christensen Subdivision, 6710 Golden Court, Applicant Robert Christensen: Final Plat Approval. k. Resolution #2006-25: 2006 Street Improvement Project 06-01: Approve Resolution Deleting the Koehnen Street Improvements. Resolution #2006-26: Surface Water Management Plan: Approve Budget Modification No. 2. in. Resolution #2006-27: Hidden Creek, Project 02-09: Accept Streets & Storm Sewer Improvements. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. 3 VP MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager CITY OF FROM: Sharmeen A]-Jaff, Senior Planner CHMMSEN E► DATE: April 10, 2006 7160 Market Boulevard PO Boz 147 SUBJ: Stonefield Final Plat Approval, Plowshares Chanhassen, MN 55317 Planning Case #05-37 Administration Phone. 952.227.11DO Fax 952.227.1110 PROPOSAL SUMMARY Building Inspections Phone: 9522271180 The developer is requesting final plat approval to subdivide 17.63 acres into 30 Fax 952 227,1190 single-family lots and 1 outlot for Stonefield. The City has approved the Engineering development contract for the storm water pond and it is under construction. Phone. 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227 1170 ACTION REQUIRED Finance Phone 952.2271140 City Council approval requires a majority of City Council present. Fax 952.2271110 Park 8 Recreation BACKGROUND Phone. 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 On January 9, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council adopted the following: Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard REZQNING Phone: 952227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 "The City Council approves Planning Case #05-37 for Rezoning from Agricultural Planning 8 Natural Resources Estate District, A-2, to Single Family Residential, for the Stonefield Subdivision, as Phone: 952.227.1130 shown on plan stamped `Received November 18, 2005." Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works PRRT.TMiNARYPLAT 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 "The City Council approves the preliminary plat for Subdivision Case #05-37 for Fax: 9522271310 Stonefield for 30 lots and 1 outiot with a right-of-way width variance, as shown on Senior Center the plans stamped `Received November 18, 2005' and as revised in the staff report, Phone: 952.227.1125 subject to the following conditions: Fax: 952.227.1110 Web She 1. The applicant will be required to meet the existing site runoff rates for 10 -year www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us and 100 -year, 24-hour storm events. The proposed enlargement of the existing stormwater pond must be designed to meet the City's minimum standards and coordinated and approved by the City Water Resources Coordinator. Finding: This condition has been partially met. The condition will read "The proposed enlargement of the existing stormwater pond must be designed to meet the City's minimum standards and coordinated and approved by the City Water Resources Coordinator." SCAWNS The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and deal parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Stonefield — Planning Case No. 05-37 April 10, 2006 Page 2 2. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations and a full-size drainage map must be submitted with the final plat for staff review and approval. Finding: This condition has been revised to read "The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations have been submitted for staffs review. Some minor revisions are still required." 3. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood level. Finding: This condition still applies. 4. Staff recommends that Type II silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, be used adjacent to the existing wetland, existing creek area, and around the proposed pond. In addition, tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. Erosion control blankets are recommended for all of the steep 3:1 slopes with an elevation change of eight feet or more. Finding: This condition has been met. 5. All plans must be signed by a registered Civil Engineer in the State of Minnesota. . Finding: This condition has been met. 6. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health, Carver County and the Williams Pipe Line Company. . Finding: This condition still applies. 7. The developer must obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. . Finding: This condition still applies. 8. On the utility plan: a. Show all the proposed storm sewer pipe type, size and class. Finding: This condition has been met. b. Show the sanitary sewer pipe slope and class. Finding: This condition has been met. c. Show watermain pipe class (C900). Finding: This condition has been met. Stonefield — Planning Case No. 05-37 April 10, 2006 Page 3 d. Add a storm sewer schedule. Finding: This condition has been met. e. Show the existing storm sewer between Lots 1 & 2, Block 1 within the center of the 20 - foot utility easement. Finding: This condition has been met. f. Show the stormwater manholes rim and invert elevations. Finding: This condition has been met. g. Add a note to remove the temporary pond outlet control structure. Finding: This condition has been met. h. The last street -accessible storm manhole discharging to the stormwater pond must be manhole with sump. Finding: This condition has been met. i. Add a note: any connection to an existing structure must be core drilled. Finding: This condition has been met. j. Extend the storm sewer farther to the south along the proposed street. Finding: This condition has been modified to read "Extend the storm sewer farther to the south along the proposed Stonefield Lane to the end of the temporary cul-de- sac:' k. Remove Lots 7 and 8 backyard storm sewer and add a storm sewer along the property line between Lots 4 and 5 and between Lots 8 and 9 block 4. Finding: This condition has been met. 9. On the grading plan: a. Show Type II silt fence adjacent to wetland, pond, creeks, etc. Finding: This condition has been met. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. Finding: This condition still applies. c. Use class 5 storm sewer in the roadway; revise the note under general grading and drainage notes accordingly. Finding: This condition has been met. d. Extend the swale between Lots 1 and 2, Block 4 farther to the east. Finding: This condition has been met. 10. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. In addition, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. . Finding: This condition still applies. 11. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,955.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,525.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees will be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. Stonefield — Planning Case No. 05-37 April 10, 2006 Page 4 Finding: This condition has been revised to read "The underlying property has not been assessed sewer or water improvements. Sanitary sewer and watermain hook-up fees are collectable with building permit issuance at the rates in effect at the time of application. The 2006 trunk hook-up charge is $1,575.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,625.00 per unit. The party applying for the permit is responsible for payments of these hook-up charges, or the fees can be specially assessed against the parcel." 12. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. . Finding: This condition still applies. 13. Any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. . Finding: This condition still applies. 14. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes.. Finding: This condition still applies. 15. The developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and construction of the lift station and forcemain and any associated costs. . Finding: This condition still applies. 16. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. . Finding: This condition still applies. 17. Add a "dead-end road" sign at the cul-de-sac. Finding: This condition still applies but has been modified to read `Revise the plans to show street lights every 300 feet, a stop sign at the street intersection and a sign at the cul-de-sac. The sign at the cul-de-sac shall read: "Temporary cul-de-sac. This roadway will be extended in the future." 18. On the plat, show all existing and proposed street names. . Finding: This condition has been met. Stonefield - Planning Case No. 05-37 April 10, 2006 Page 5 19. Add City Detail Plate Nos. 1001, 1002, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1009, 2001, 2101, 2109, 2110, 2201, 2204, 3101, 3102, 3104, 3106, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5200, 5203, 5204, 5206, 5214, 5215, 5216, 5217, 5221, 5232, 5234, 5240, 5241, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A and 5313. . Finding: This condition has been met. 20. Show the street lights and a stop sign on the plans. Finding: This condition still applies but has been modified to read "Show the street lights at 300 foot intervals and a stop sign on the plans." 21. Submit public utility plans and profile for staff review. . Finding: This condition has been met. 22. City Forester's Conditions: a. A minimum of two overstory trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. b. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. c. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. d. Tree preservation on site shall be according to tree preservation plans dated 10/14/05. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. Finding: This condition still applies. 23. In the absence of parkland dedication, it is recommended that Stonefield pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final platting. At today's rate, these fees would total $120,000 (30 lots x $4,000). Additionally, the applicant is required to construct the neighborhood asphalt trail connector to the property line as depicted on their preliminary plan submittals. Finding: This condition still applies but has been modified to read "In the absence of parkland dedication, it is recommended that Stonefield pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final platting. At today's rate, these fees would total $174,000 (30 lots x $5,800). Additionally, the applicant is required to construct the neighborhood asphalt trail connector to the property line as depicted on their preliminary plan submittals." 24. Water Resource Coordinator's Conditions: Stonefield — Planning Case No. 05-37 April 10, 2006 Page 6 a. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetland D. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. Finding: This condition still applies but has been modified to read: "A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetland D on Lots 8-10, Block 3. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs on Lots 8-10, Block 3 under the direction of City staff before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign." b. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. Finding: This condition still applies but has been modified to read: "All structures on Lots 8-10, Block 3 shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge c. The applicant shall work with the City's consultant to accommodate regional and site- specific storm water needs. Finding: This condition has been met. d. The approximate location and extent of drain tile shall be shown on the plans. The applicant shall provide details as to whether the tile line will be removed, abandoned in place or remain. If the tile is to remain, the flow from the tile shall be accommodated in the design of the storm water management plan. Finding: This condition has been met. e. The applicant shall provide rate control and storm water treatment to reduce off-site impacts. To provide a low -gradient means for controlling rate and volume, the applicant shall consider cooperating with the City to construct a wetland in the rear portions of any number of Lots 1-8, Block 3. In the event that the applicant is interested in pursuing wetland construction for banking purposes, this planning shall be integrated with the City's consultant's storm water infrastructure planning. Finding: This condition no longer applies. f. Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) shall be provided over all existing wetlands, storm water infrastructure and storm water ponds. Finding: This condition has been met. g. The developer asserts that, due to the steep grade in the southern portion of the property, custom grading would not save any additional trees. In addition, the developer maintains Stonefield — Planning Case No. 05-37 April 10, 2006 Page 7 that the slope of the road and the location of the retaining wall make custom grading lots impractical. If the developer demonstrates to the satisfaction of staff that custom grading for their typical house pad would not result in additional significant tree preservation, mass grading of this area may be approved. Finding: This condition has been met. h. The existing outlet structure of Pond A shall be removed and replaced in accordance with the City's standard detail. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) shall be provided for the pond. Finding: This condition can be removed because it is redundant. The portion of the silt fence that runs from the pipeline easement through Lot 7, Block 3 shall be moved upslope to the west by 30 to 60 feet to more clearly define the grading limits. The area of property between the silt fence and the gully and property line shall be seeded and mulched to control weeds and get a desirable cover crop in areas that were recently farmed. Finding: This condition has been met. A temporary basin shall be constructed in the vicinity of Lots 6 and 7, Block 3. The temporary sediment basin shall be installed prior to disturbing upslope area. A temporary perforated riser and stable emergency overflow (EOF) for the basin shall be installed; details shall be included in the plan. The basin shall be properly sized for the watershed area, according to NPDES requirements (i.e. The basins must provide storage below the outlet pipe for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2 -year, 24-hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shall the basin provide less than 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe from each acre drained to the basin). Finding: This condition still applies. k. Chanhassen Type 2 silt fence shall be provided for the perimeter of the site up to Lot 10, Block 3. From there, Type 1 may be used. Silt fence shall be shown on the plans around Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. Finding: This condition no longer applies. 1. Curbside inlet controls are needed; Wimco type or ESS type (or approved similar protection) inlet controls shall be used. Curbside inlet protection shall be provided for existing inlets adjacent to the site exit on Osprey Lane. City standard inlet protection details 5302 and 5302A shall be included in the plans. The proposed rear yard catch basin protection shall be revised; Wimco type, ESS type or equal must be used. The proposed silt fence shall be installed with additional rock around Chanhassen type 1 silt fence. Stonefield — Planning Case No. 05-37 April 10, 2006 Page 8 Finding: This condition still applies. in. The plans shall be revised to show energy dissipation for the flared end section on Lot 7, Block 3. Finding: This condition has been met. n. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: TyW of Slone Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Finding: This condition still applies. o. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. Finding: This condition still applies. p. In order to fund the maintenance and expansion of the BC -P4.10 storm water pond and construction of additional capacity, the costs will be allocated among the benefiting properties. The total cost of materials and construction will be divided by the number of acres in the resulting subwatershed. The City will be responsible for the acres contributing from land already developed, park land and land to be developed in the future (e.g., the Bongard parcel). The developer will be responsible for the acres contributing from their development. If, for any reason, the regional storm water facility is not constructed, the developer will be responsible for providing storm water quality and quantity management on the subject property and paying Surface Water Management connection charges in accordance with City Code. At this time, the estimated total SWAP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $65,364. Finding: This condition has been revised to read "The developer shall abide by the agreement for Storm Water Facilities Improvements dated March 1, 2006, executed by the developer and the City of Chanhassen. The total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of Irma] plat recording is $59,299." Stonefield — Planning Case No. 05-37 April 10, 2006 Page 9 q. In conjunction with the BC -P4.10 storm water ponding project, land in addition to the land shown in Outlot A may be required. At this time, the estimated amount of land is approximately 0.5 acres. The developer and the City will seek to agree upon the terms of the use of land for ponding should additional land be required. The developer, if required, shall provide additional land for ponding. Finding: This condition has been met. 25. Fire Marshall Conditions: a. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be either removed from site or chipped. Finding: This condition still applies. b. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. Finding: This condition still applies. c. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. Finding: This condition still applies. d. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. Finding: This condition still applies. e. Fire hydrant spacing is acceptable. Finding: This condition still applies. f. Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. Finding: This condition has been met. Stonefield — Planning Case No. 05-37 April 10, 2006 Page 10 26. Building Official Conditions: a. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. Finding: This condition still applies. b. Demolition permits must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site. Finding: This condition does not apply. There are no structures on the site. c. The developer must submit a list of proposed street names for review and approval prior to final plat of the property. Finding: This condition has been met. d. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. Finding: This condition still applies. e. Separate sewer and water services must be provided to each lot. Finding: This condition still applies. f. Existing wells and on-site sewage treatment systems on the site must be abandoned in accordance with State Law and City Code. Finding: This condition does not apply. There are no existing wells or on-site treatment systems on the site. 27. The retaining walls shall be maintained by a Homeowners Association. . Finding: This condition still applies. 28. The City shall not be responsible for maintenance of storm water infrastructure on Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block 3. Finding: This condition still applies. 29. In the event that the regional pond project is not constructed, the applicant has proposed the installation of a second outlet structure on Pond A. In that event, the existing outlet structure that is failing must also be replaced. The cost of a new outlet structure to replace the existing failing structure would be borne by the City, but the replacement would be done by the applicant." Finding: This condition still applies. Stonefield — Planning Case No. 05-37 April 10, 2006 Page 11 FINAL PLAT The applicant is proposing to subdivide 17.63 Acres into 30 single-family lots and 1 outlot. The density of the proposed subdivision is 1.7 units per acre gross and 2.08 units per acre net after removing the roads and wetlands. All the lots exceed the minimum 15,000 square feet of area, with an average lot size of 20,939 square feet. The site is zoned Residential Single Family District (RSF). All of the proposed lots meet the minimum width and depth requirements of the RSF Zoning Ordinance. There is one outlot proposed on the site. This outlot will contain a sidewalk, storm pond and an existing pipe line. Lots 8 through 10, Block 3, abut a wetland. The ordinance requires all structures to maintain a 40 - foot setback from the outside edge of a wetland buffer strip. The ordinance also requires a buffer zone in addition to the wetland setback. A wetland buffer 16.5 feet in width must be maintained around the wetland. There is a numerical error on the plat for Lot 2, Block 1. The plat reflects a 89.74 foot frontage when the actual measurement is 90 feet. Staff added a condition requiring correction of the error on the plat. Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL The site area is about 17.60 acres and has tree cover over approximately 4.69 acres (27%) of the parcel with a variety of grade changes. The site elevations range from a high of 970± to a low of 912±. These severe elevation differences make it challenging to both develop and minimize grading on this site. The plans propose to grade about 80% of the site for 30 new house pads, a proposed street and enlarging an existing stormwater pond. The proposed grading will prepare the site for full basement and walk -out type house pads. Retaining walls are proposed throughout the site due to the severe elevation differences and to create the house pads. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. Retaining walls within drainage and utility easements must be minimized, however, staff understands that this may not be feasible; therefore, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. The existing site drainage is encompassed within almost one drainage area. Under existing conditions, the site drains from the north and west sides to the east to an existing wetland along the southeast side of the property line. Under developed conditions, the applicant is proposing to capture all of the street drainage, all of the front yard drainage, and some rear yard drainage from the lots on the west side interior lots. This stormwater will be conveyed via storm sewer to an existing pond in the northeast corner of the site for treatment. Stonefield — Planning Case No. 05-37 April 10, 2006 Page 12 The existing stormwater pond was designed to treat much of the site drainage areas adjacent to the parcel from the north and northeast sides. Since the applicant is proposing to enlarge the existing stormwater pond to accommodate the additional drainage generated from the proposed site, the enlargement must be designed to City standards and coordinated and approved by the City's Water Resources Coordinator. Drainage and storm sewer sizing calculations for the site have been submitted and some changes must be made. The applicant is required to meet the existing site peak runoff rates for the 10 - year and 100 -year, 24-hour storm events. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood level. Proposed erosion control must be developed in accordance with the MPCA's best management practices. Staff recommends that Type II silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, to be used adjacent to the existing wetland, existing creek area, and around the pond. In addition, tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. Erosion control blankets are required for all 3:1 slopes with an elevation change of eight feet or more. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. The applicant should be aware that any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. UTIIdTIES Municipal water service is available to the site from Osprey Lane and sewer is available at the Bluebill Trail and Osprey Lane intersection. The water and sewer mains will be extended south from Osprey Lane to serve the site and stubbed at the southwest corner of the parcel for future extension to the west. Due to the topography of the site and the elevation of the existing sanitary sewer, the site can not be served by a gravity sanitary sewer system, therefore, a lift station is proposed between Lot 4, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 3. The lift station is not identified on the Trunk Sanitary Sewer System map, or in the capital improvement plan, therefore, the developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and installation of the lift station and forcemain. The lift station and forcemain must meet the City's minimum requirements. The developer is responsible for any additional work required to install the lift station and forcemain, including, but not limited to dewatering costs, grading, subgrade correction and signal tests. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2006 trunk hookup charge is $1,575.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,625.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Upon completion and final acceptance of the utility improvements, the City will own and maintain these utilities. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial Stonefield — Planning Case No. 05-37 April 10, 2006 Page 13 security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. The developer must obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health and Carver County, Williams Pipe Line Company. Once the executed development contract, securities, fees and permits have been submitted, a preconstruction meeting must be held before grading and/or utility construction can begin. STREETS The proposed development lies east of Audubon Road and north of Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18), A -Minor Expander Arterials as identified on SRF Consulting Group Inc.'s Functional Classification Map, On September 29, 2005, City Council approved the Arterial Collector Fee which is $2,400/developable acre for residential development. All new developments along the Lyman Boulevard corridor are subject to this fee. The proceeds of this fee will fund the reconstruction of Lyman Boulevard between Audubon Road and Powers Boulevard. The Arterial Collector Fee is calculated as follows: 11.19 acres developable area x $2,400/acre = $26,856.00 The plans show Osprey Lane within two right-of-ways, 50 -foot and 60 -foot wide to match the existing right-of-way widths to the east and west. The developer proposes to raise the portion of Osprey Lane that abuts Stonefield by 2 feet to provide a safer vertical curve. The plans propose one full access to the site off of Osprey Lane from the north. The proposed public street complies with the minimum required right-of-way and pavement width. A temporary 90 -foot diameter cul-de-sac turnaround for emergency vehicles is proposed at the southwest end of the proposed street and a "Dead End Road" sign will be required. Surface Water Management Fees The developer is cooperating with the City of Chanhassen to maintain and improve the regional storm water facilities on the Stonefield site and on the adjacent Power Hill Park property. The developer and the City have entered into a separate agreement that outlines the parameters of this cooperative effort. The developer is required to abide by the Agreement for Storm Water Facilities Improvements (March 1, 2006), executed by the developer and the City of Chanhassen. Water Quality Fees Because of the impervious surface associated with this development, the water quality fees for this proposed development are based on single-family residential development rates of $1,600/acre. Stonefield — Planning Case No. 05-37 April 10, 2006 Page 14 Based on the proposed developed area of approximately 16.31 acres, the water quality fees associated with this project are $26,096. Water Quantity Fees The SWMP has established a connection charge for the different land uses based on an average citywide rate for the installation of water quantity systems. This cost includes land acquisition, proposed SWMP culverts, open channels, and storm water ponding areas for runoff storage. Single- family residential developments have a connection charge of $2,900 per developable acre. This results in a water quantity fee of approximately $47,299 for the proposed development. SWMP Credits Because the applicant is providing storm water quality treatment for runoff from the proposed subdivision in conjunction with the regional ponding project, the applicant is eligible for a water quality credit of $14,096. The total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $59,299. PARK DEDICATION PARKS The property is situated directly west of and shares a common border with Power Hill park. This neighborhood park was developed in approximately 1990 and features a large sliding hill, basketball court, playground, small park shelter and limited off-street parking. A significant elevation change exists between the top of Power Hill Park and the location proposed for the new homes in Stonefield. This will be a deterrent for some residents of the new subdivision as they attempt to visit the park. No additional parkland acquisition or dedication is recommended as a condition of this subdivision request. Full park fees in lieu TRAILS Many neighborhoods adjoining Power Hill Park gain access to the park from neighborhood trail connectors. The applicant has included such a connector in their submittal. The proposed location for the trail connector, within Outlot A, is acceptable to staff. TREE PRESERVATION/LANDSCAPING Tree canopy calculations have been submitted for the Stonefield development. They are as follows: Total upland area (excluding wetlands) 17.60 ac. Baseline canopy coverage 27% or 4.69 ac. Minimum canopy coverage allowed 30% or 5.28 ac. Proposed tree preservation 7% or 1.25 ac. Stonefield — Planning Case No. 05-37 April 10, 2006 Page 15 The applicant does not meet minimum canopy coverage allowed; therefore, the difference between the baseline and proposed tree preservation is multiplied by 1.2 to calculate the required replacement plantings. Difference in canopy coverage (4.69-1.25) 149,846 SF or 3.44 ac. Multiplier 1.2 Total replacement 179,815 SF Total number of trees to be planted 165 trees The applicant also needs to make up the difference between the existing canopy coverage (4.69 ac) and the required canopy coverage (5.28 ac). Difference in canopy coverage 25,700 SF or S9 ac Number of trees to be planted 24 Total number of trees required 189 The applicant has proposed a total of 189 trees - 77 overstory trees, 32 ornamentals and 80 evergreens in their landscape plan. No bufferyards are required. The land uses of neighboring properties are similar. The applicant exceeds the recommended 105' of tree removal for wooded lots. Even with the use of extensive retaining walls, the amount of tree removal in the wooded area of the property exceeds minimum ordinance requirements. However, it is less than what could potentially be removed without the use of retaining walls. Staff recommends that alternatives to the proposed plan be thoroughly researched by the applicant. Possible solutions would include larger lots on the southern end, different home styles that are more sensitive to the topography and custom graded lots. COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE - RSF DISTRICT Setbacks: front, side, Wetland Area Frontage (ft) Depth rear, wetland buffer Buffer (sq. ft.) (ft) setback (ft) Code 15,000 90 125 30, 10, 30, 40 16.5 Block 1 Lot 1 16,324 91.44 220.8 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 2 15,264 90.00 179.25 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Block 2 Lot 1 (Corner 15,200 92.37, 127.07 136.07 30/30, 10/10, N/A, N/A N/A Lot) Lot 2 15,123 99.01 153.03 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 3 19,952 81.94 @ Front Lot Line 170.07 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 90.00 @ Setback Line Stonefield — Planning Case No. 05-37 April 10, 2006 Page 16 --[(sq. Setbacks: front, side, Wetland ea Frontage (ft) Depth rear, wetland buffer Buffer . setback (ft) Code 15,000 90 125 30, 10, 30, 40 16.5 Lot 4 18,937 85.02 @ Front Lot Line 165.95 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 95.23 @ Setback Line Block 3 Lot 1 35,876 88.26 @ Front Lot Line 227.99 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 95.26 @ Setback Line Lot 2 25,931 90.00 250.51 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 3 23,568 105.48 266.44 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 4 23,995 104.33 296.75 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 5 26,253 90.00 291.70 30, 10, 30, 40 16.5 Lot 6 25,506 90.00 283.40 30, 10, N/A, 40 16.5 Lot 7 25,700 89.01 @ Front Lot Line 274.87 30, 10, N/A, 40 16.5 90 @ Setback Line Lot 8 25,348 78.51 @ Front Lot Line 225.21 30, 10, N/A, 40 16.5 90 @ Setback Line Lot 9 21,983 78.51 @ Front Lot Line 212.18 30, 10, 30, 40 16.5 90 @ Setback Line Lot 10 34,207 78.51 @ Front Lot Line 244.11 30, 10, 30, 40 16.5 90 @ Setback Line Lot 11 23,343 78.51 @ Front Lot Line 209.80 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 90 @ Setback Line Lot 12 17,596 86.74@ Front Lot Line 169.77 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 94.29 @ Setback Line Block 4 Lot 1 (Corner 15,104 96.22 127.88 30/30, 10/10, N/A, N/A N/A Lot) Lot 2 15,616 92.09 174.36 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 3 21,205 138.65 213.43 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 4 23,769 130.07 223.37 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 5 18,727 90.00 208.08 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 6 18,180 86.25 @ Front Lot Line 187.04 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 90.12 @ Setback Line Lot 7 16,924 85.9 @ Front Lot Line 174.45 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 90.13 @ Setback Line Lot 8 16,450 87.93 @ Front Lot Line 175.57 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 90.10 @ Setback Line Lot 9 16,498 90.00 183.31 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 10 17,245 90.00 191.61 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 11 17,754 98.14 196.50 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 12 20,608 261.54 197.23 30, 10/10, N/A, N/A N/A Outlot A 57,521 Right -of- 97,580 Stonefield — Planning Case No. 05-37 April 10, 2006 Page 17 @ Meets 90 foot width at the building setback line. na — Not Applicable RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following motion: "The City Council grants final plat approval of Planning Case #05-37 for Stonefield for 30 lots and 1 outlot with a right-of-way width variance, as shown on the plans stamped `Received March 1, 2006', subject to the following conditions: The proposed enlargement of the existing stormwater pond must be designed to meet the City's minimum standards and coordinated and approved by the City Water Resources Coordinator. 2. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations have been submitted for staffs review and some minor revisions are still needed. 3. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood level. 4. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health, Carver County and the Williams Pipe Line Company. 5. The developer must obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. 6. On the utility plan: a. Add a note: All water services must be (1") Type K copper. b. Extend the storm sewer further to the south along the proposed Stonfield Lane to the end of the temporary cul-de-sac. c. All backyard catch basins must be built per City Detail Plate No. 3103. d. Add a catch basin at the north east comer of Lot 1, Block 4 along Osprey Lane or proposed Stonfield Lane. Setbacks: front, side, Wetland t. Frontage (ft) D(ef jh rear, wetland buffer Buffer (sq setback (ft) Code 15,000 90 125 30, 10, 30, 40 16.5 way TOTAL 628,186 @ Meets 90 foot width at the building setback line. na — Not Applicable RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following motion: "The City Council grants final plat approval of Planning Case #05-37 for Stonefield for 30 lots and 1 outlot with a right-of-way width variance, as shown on the plans stamped `Received March 1, 2006', subject to the following conditions: The proposed enlargement of the existing stormwater pond must be designed to meet the City's minimum standards and coordinated and approved by the City Water Resources Coordinator. 2. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations have been submitted for staffs review and some minor revisions are still needed. 3. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood level. 4. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health, Carver County and the Williams Pipe Line Company. 5. The developer must obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. 6. On the utility plan: a. Add a note: All water services must be (1") Type K copper. b. Extend the storm sewer further to the south along the proposed Stonfield Lane to the end of the temporary cul-de-sac. c. All backyard catch basins must be built per City Detail Plate No. 3103. d. Add a catch basin at the north east comer of Lot 1, Block 4 along Osprey Lane or proposed Stonfield Lane. Stonefield — Planning Case No. 05-37 April 10, 2006 Page 18 7. On the grading plan: a. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. 8. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. In addition, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. 9. The underlying property has not been assessed sewer or water improvements. Sanitary sewer and watermain hook-up fees are collectable with building permit issuance at the rates in effect at the time of application. The 2006 trunk hook-up charge is $1,575.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,625.00 per unit. The party applying for the permit is responsible for payments of these hook-up charges, or the fees can be specially assessed against the parcel. 10. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 11. Any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. 12. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. . 13. The developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and construction of the lift station and forcemain and any associated costs. 14. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 15. Revise the plans to show street lights every 300 feet, a stop sign at the street intersection and a sign at the cul-de-sac. The sign at the cul-de-sac shall read: "Temporary cul-de-sac. This roadway will be extended in the future." 16. City Forester's Conditions: a. A minimum of two overstory trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. b. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. c. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. Stonefield — Planning Case No. 05-37 April 10, 2006 Page 19 d. Tree preservation on site shall be according to tree preservation plans dated 10/14/05. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 17. In the absence of parkland dedication, it is recommended that Stonefield pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final platting. At today's rate, these fees would total $174,000 (30 lots x $5,800). Additionally, the applicant is required to construct the neighborhood asphalt trail connector to the property line as depicted on their preliminary plan submittals. 18. Water Resource Coordinator's Conditions: a. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetland D on Lots 8-10, Block 3. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs on Lots 8-10, Block 3 under the direction of City staff before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. b. All structures on Lots 8-10, Block 3 shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. c. A temporary basin shall be constructed in the vicinity of Lots 6 and 7, Block 3. The temporary sediment basin shall be installed prior to disturbing upslope area. A temporary perforated riser and stable emergency overflow (EOF) for the basin shall be installed; details shall be included in the plan. The basin shall be properly sized for the watershed area, according to NPDES requirements (i.e. The basins must provide storage below the outlet pipe for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2 -year, 24-hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shall the basin provide less than 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe from each acre drained to the basin). d. Curbside inlet controls are needed; Wimco type or ESS type (or approved similar protection) inlet controls shall be used. Curbside inlet protection shall be provided for existing inlets adjacent to the site exit on Osprey Lane. City standard inlet protection details 5302 and 5302A shall be included in the plans. The proposed rear yard catch basin protection shall be revised; Wimco type, ESS type or equal must be used. The proposed silt fence shall be installed with additional rock around Chanhassen type 1 silt fence. e. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days Stonefield — Planning Case No. 05-37 April 10, 2006 Page 20 These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. f. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. g. The developer shall abide by the agreement for Storm Water Facilities Improvements dated March 1, 2006, executed by the developer and the City of Chanhassen. The total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is $59,299. 19. Fire Marshall Conditions: a. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be either removed from site or chipped. b. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. c. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. d. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. e. Fire hydrant spacing is acceptable. 20. Building Official Conditions: a. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. b. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. c. Separate sewer and water services must be provided to each lot. 21. The retaining walls shall be maintained by a Homeowners Association. Stonefield — Planning Case No. 05-37 April 10, 2006 Page 21 22. The City shall not be responsible for maintenance of storm water infrastructure on Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block 3. 23. In the event that the regional pond project is not constructed, the applicant has proposed the installation of a second outlet structure on Pond A. In that event, the existing outlet structure that is failing must also be replaced. The cost of a new outlet structure to replace the existing failing structure would be home by the City, but the replacement would be done by the applicant. 24. The developer shall pay the $26,856.00 Arterial Collector Fee. 25. Approval of the final plat is contingent upon approval of final construction plans/specifications for the project along with the developer entering into a development contract with the City and supplying the necessary financial security and fees. 26. Due to the amount of fill required to reconstruct the section of Osprey Lane that abuts the Stonefield development, Osprey Lane must be closed to traffic for a period of time this summer. The City authorizes the closure of Osprey Lane from May 1, 2006 until July 31, 2006. The developer must notify in writing all properties within 500 feet of the development to inform the residents of the upcoming closure, the detour route and why the closure is necessary by April 17, 2006. "Road Closed" and detour signs must be posted a minimum of 10 days before the closure. Requests to extend the time of closure must be submitted in writing to the City Engineer for consideration. 27. The frontage on Lot 2, Block 1, shall be corrected to reflect 90 feet." ATTACHN ENTS 1. Agreement for Storm Water Facilities Improvements. 2. Final Plat. g:\plan\2005 planning cases\05-37 stmefield (goers pmperty)Tinal platAm AGREEMENT FOR STORM WATER FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT dated , 2006, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Minnesota corporation (the "Developer"). Statement of Facts A. The city has conditionally approved a preliminary plat for Stonefield (the "plat"). Developer is in the process of seeking final plat approval. The land being platted is legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" and is hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property". This Agreement is entered into pursuant to M.S. 462.358. B. The City currently operates and maintains (i) two storm water ponds on a parcel of real property adjacent to the Subject Property (the "On -Site Ponds') (a site plan showing the existing On -Site Ponds is attached as Exhibit `B"), and (ii) one storm water pond on a parcel of real property several blocks away from the Subject Property (the "North Pond") (a site plan showing the existing North Pond is attached as Exhibit "C'). The 122936v05 1 CHAMSToNEFiELD RNK:102/21/2006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) On -Site Ponds and North Pond shall collectively be defined as the "Ponds". C. The City has determined that: (i) the existing On -Site Ponds need to be dredged and improved; and (ii) the North Pond needs to be dredged, as soon as possible. The City has also determined that a shared pond in the approximate location of the On -Site Ponds and partially located on the Subject Property will effectively serve the City's and Stonefield's storm water retention needs. D. To that end, the City has caused certain storm water retention pond improvement plans to be prepared for the On -Site Ponds. Such plans have been incorporated with the plans for Stonefield and the resulting site plan is attached hereto as Exhibit "D". E. In order to complete the grading of Stonefield and the On -Site Ponds improvements in a cost effective and timely manner, Developer has agreed to perform the Pond improvements and dredging in conjunction with its grading of Stonefield, and City has agreed to reimburse Developer for engineering and survey expenses ("Expenses") not to exceed $9,750, plus construction costs, incurred by Developer, as follows: (i) 87.7% of the On -Site Ponds improvement costs and Expenses, and (ii) 100% of the North Pond dredging costs and Expenses. Now therefore, in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged the parties hereto agree as follows: 122936v05 2 CHAN:SroNEFIELD RNK:r02/21/2006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) 1. Early Grading/Improvement Approval. The City hereby authorizes entry onto the City's property by Developer and its contractors to construct the storm water facilities improvements contemplated herein (i) within Stonefield, (ii) within the City's adjacent land, and (iii) within the City's land upon which the North Pond is located, to complete the improvements and dredging contemplated in this agreement, in conjunction with the early grading of Stonefield, prior to final plat approval of Stonefield; provided that the Developer enter into this Agreement, abide by its terms, and furnish the security required by it. 2. Plans. The storm water facilities shall be constructed by the Developer on the Subject Property and adjacent property in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Agreement. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Agreement, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A - Grading and Erosion Control Plan Plan B - Plans and Specifications for Storm Water Facilities to be famished by the City No work can occur outside of the areas indicated on the plans without modifying this Agreement or obtaining a separate grading permit. Prior to commencing work, the Developer must submit a bid(s) for such work to the city for city approval. 3. Erosion Control. Prior to initiating site grading, erosion control shall be implemented by the Developer according to the grading, drainage, and erosion control plan A and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded as soon as weather permits. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Transportation's seeding specification to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be 122936v05 3 CHAN:SroxFrin.D RNK:102/212006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City shall (except in emergencies) notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten (10) days, the City may draw down the letter of credit to pay any costs. The cost allocation set forth in paragraph 10(D) shall apply to the requirements of this paragraph. 4. Term. The storm water facilities improvements to the On -Site Ponds must be constructed and completed between March 1, 2006 and April 1, 2006. The dredging of the North Pond must be completed between March 1, 2006 and June 15, 2006. Both of the foregoing deadlines are subject to extensions caused by the City and other force majeure events and matters beyond Developer's control 5. Clean up. The Developer shall promptly clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. City Engineering Administration and Construction Observation. Subject to cost allocation and reimbursement as contemplated in Section 10(D) below, the Developer shall pay a fee for in-house engineering administration. City engineering administration will include monitoring of construction, observation and consultation with Developer and Developer's engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for fmal inspection and acceptance, project monitoring during the warranty period, and processing of requests for reduction in security. Fees for this service shall be approximately $10,637, which is three percent (3%) of the estimated construction costs. The Developer shall pay 12.3% of this fee in cash at the time of approval of 122936v05 4 CHAN:STONmELD RNK:ro2/21 /2006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) this Agreement. Subject to cost allocation and reimbursement pursuant to Section 10(D) below, the Developer shall pay for construction observation performed by the City's in-house engineering staff or consulting engineer. Construction observation shall include part or full time inspection of proposed public utilities and will be billed on hourly rates estimated to be seven percent (71/6) of the construction costs, such fee shall be subject to cost allocation and reimbursement pursuant to Section 10(D) below. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, the Developer shall famish the City with a cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit, in the form attached hereto, from Developer's bank (Lakeland Construction Finance, LLC) ("security") for approximately $43,613, which is 12.3% of the estimated project cost. The City may draw down the security, with 3 business days advance notice, for any violation of the terms of this Contract or if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the completion of the On -Site Ponds improvement work. If the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to pay Developer's share of the cost to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof reasonably satisfactory to the City that (i) On -Site Ponds improvement work has been completed, (ii) financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, (iii) the required "as constructed" plans have been received by the City, (iv) a one year warranty security is provided, and (v) the public improvements are accepted by the City Council (which acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), the security shall be released to Developer. The City standard specifications for utilities and street construction outline procedures for security reductions. In addition, to guarantee completion of the additional grading of the Subject Property (not related to the On -Site Ponds), Developer shall famish City with a cash escrow or 122936x05 5 CHAMSTONEFtEtn RNK:102/212006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) irrevocable letter of credit in the form attached hereto, from a bank (the "additional security") for $Z5920.6 an amount equivalent to 110% of estimated cost of such additional grading. With City approval (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), the additional security may be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the amounts certified by Developer's engineer shall be retained by City until all of the additional grading has been completed. 8. Insurance. During the period that such work is being performed, the Developer shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to construction of the public improvements. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given thirty (30) days advance written notice of any changes to or the cancellation of the insurance. The certificate may not contain any disclaimer for failure to give the required notice. 9. Acknowledgement. Although this Agreement is entered into pursuant to M.S. 462.358, the Developer acknowledges that approval of the work under this Agreement does not constitute a guarantee by the City of any future subdivision approvals and that, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Developer performs the work on the Subject Property at its own risk. 122936v05 6 CHAN:STorEFrn.D RNK:A2/212006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) 10. Responsibility for Costs. A. Subject to cost allocation and reimbursement pursuant to Section 10(D) below, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the work to be performed hereunder, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of this Agreement, the preparation of this Agreement, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting the grading and erosion control. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from Developer's or its contractors' negligence or willful misconduct and for work done in conjunction with this Agreement which is not in compliance with the approved Plans (as amended). The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorney's fees. C. The defaulting party shall reimburse the non -defaulting party for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Agreement, including engineering and attorney's fees. D. The City will reimburse the Developer for: (i) 87.7% of the cost of constructing the On -Site Ponds storm water facilities and improvement; and (ii) 100% of the cost of dredging the North Pond. The Developer shall provide the City with an itemized billing. The Developer shall be solely responsible for any grading performed within the Subject Property that is not required in connection the On -Site Ponds improvements. E. The City shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the Developer for obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If such amount is 12293605 7 CHAN:SroNEFiE f) RNK:r02/21/2006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) not paid in full within such 30 day period, interest shall accrue at the rate of 10% per annum on any overdue amounts, until paid in full with interest. F. The Developer and the Developer's engineer shall have no liability or responsibility for the design of the storm water facilities, and once the work contemplated herein is completed and as -built plans are approved by the City, Developer shall have no liability or responsibility (except for its construction warranty contemplated in Section 7 above) for or in connection with the storm water facilities. 11. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for 12.3% of any expense so incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than 48 hours in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a court order for permission to enter the land. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY:� A — s ZAFong, M or(SEAL) /, ANDv 'rfodd Gerhardt, City Manager/Clerk DEVELOPER: PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT, INC. BY: —cam V"` �" �+\ Its: President 12293605 8 CHAN:STONEflELD RNK:r02/21/2006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _?At -day of �, 2006, by Thomas A. Furlong and by Todd Gerhardt, respectively the Mayor and City Manager/Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA)KAREN J. ENGELHARDT Notary Public -Minnesota ( Ss. UR��oaw mleabn Explrw Jin 31,2010 COUNTY OF rV�IN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I ' day of �A•rQk , 2006, by Todd M. Summing, the President of Plowshares Development, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. JWKflRYNB C-1ANNACK NOTARY Pl1BL1C-ACrAlESOTA WOOAUASSION EPIF1S 1J1"2am NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651)452-5000 RNK 1060555.2 122936vO5 9 CHAMSTONEFIELD RNK:t02/21/2006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description of Subject Property 122936vO5 10 CHAN:SToNuruD RNK:rO2/21/2006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) EXHIBIT "B" Site Plan of Existing On -Site Ponds 122936x05 11 CHAN:SroNEFIFLD RNK:r02/21/2006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) 122936v05 RNK:r02/21/2006 EXHIBIT "C" Site Plan of Eaistina North Pond 12 CHAN:StornFian (Plowsbues Development, LLC) EXHIBIT "D" Site Plan of Stonefield and New On -Site Ponds 122936vO5 13 CHAN:STONEFIELD RNK-rO2/21/2006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. _ Date: TO: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. dated 2006, of (Name of Bank) b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Manager of the City of Chanhassen; c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2 ; and d) Certify that notice was provided to (Name of Developer) as required under that certain Agreement for Storm Water Facilities Improvements dated 2006, or that such notice was not required thereunder. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Chanhassen City Manager that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Chanhassen City Manager, Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 317, Chanhassen, MN 55317, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 500. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. BY: Its 122936x05 14 CHAN:STONEFIELD RNK:r02/21/2006 (Plowshares Development, LLC) S TONEF/ELD %.gW.VL YM BY DIflY MES(N 19 I.I FOW.ew 0•wpnml. M, a YNn•«b toryvolkn.. M v'•w of Ine lylo✓Bq oew0x plpvly • uv • • unty vl [bwSlat nel Nbnu.tq . 1 MNneataa.... I tt.,Y./%aananll.. ., � 12mO liouwlMNY r.61m]kn.: L�wnmm� Ia tLl.. Sx5[u IR.M llAl -11111 oIvI pwnN v/ mit Nvinmf Wwlw .l . Nw M1xel Wnlw: I mm SwIM1 B9 E.pw. U. miwlm 19 nmrle Xi.L o.wM1 e+umN. qnp M. SeuM h. vl.vitl NSMxeI polo l./ IM Nwfn«afnGywfn.. pi.lnx / l➢J Ctl Mf fv f e/ Wgnnnp .I IM IM Iv b M.vAµ Mn« Mvfn p.pr�. 5) m.nulu Zl ..m+vM1 tlNlmx ./ KO W M fMIf wM IR mNrilxM1NmI(l .vqO. uf.. w. lssMZ lm«I vl 1Slb...MrnMe, I;XYIs�'e MN.wMM<.39.rMx3pr.woMn m.l v.l.xb Npw-d.Mv.tnf. m.N.1/m.«wb 1.17 J1 Mpmm11. 0AlM1.m1 m MII*WNwmWm... l W1-1 r5&Oi MFnwl vt/.Mxo.JsIJ .m Mvfn x m.cvM ww.p .de Nwm 1m. me In•y .+n alma ANp IKr awl .I M Swln.xf dwln .I M MM...I ynlx al ]uIM ZS l.mn0 II Rmyr ZS x.v [Nn ram MI lybp M In/y .r rn. M..bp M e a.9nnbp .r . R�1 x M .wrasin .I pmin fsw i/1 .r Nw r/I/ m mr e1].Jrtl/�MMI e/ M Nwen.®I ewnn M.r../'� eme salt weeMrMameriq ¢. .eA un •] mlwln 01 ..rnA Iron W.1 1.1 ]aM /ren .MG NwM M... mWm« ./ 16119 Mh, Mon SwfxMY xRefli9 I. Ms /1 Jt xp v JS mMx. ]) .uwM.. N.Imu .I ISf RZ MI: M lnlY xll.elAq b . x1911 ]] Mpm b mbuln 51 na.+h v fmrMv(I /hfvl ]N )J MI; M xNs,vwMe.YI y�1.wMp MIM aIIM vl IM.Counl R��Lw l L fM Z Mr N M s .1 M.1.,1-, vlMMWw(Sw 1/1 .1 NW r/I) xw.1110 « .1mSnMl .I M tv-1 Wln (sl 114 .1 1/11 MnSwlaelc. .1 w.ml M. 4-I Prwln 1. 1M S.v n11. r (1. 1/ 10 vl 1� rw/I) m0 Mr Mp mwMp Iv n. pbl I.InM m Y N Y INp yIbf A. 91nmubM Rpp., ttewYNp fa In. "I loop/ m IM w .I 1.1, Me .Mx v/ Me Lon fY RcwW. Lmn Comlp [MxS M. .-. f. I,. -w .0.1(.. M 51MT(ISLOM. M 1,.,. 11 m.. 11 f[ M.1. Imo M.uM .- M. mv .m...M m « *.- II. oIlll I avMap .1, awao.x ...Mu.l m 111,1.1 ..ryxe .nnxl.me pv..5wx aww.nn4 M . ubnx. _ <..e.tl mx. arxnl, ro .. YSnM ay rrB9wuB(s aneaMYwc we Ry IWp N. ShmMP Rup«f SIAK IWYBQB1A sawn M M• arul(uf ./ p.Mw« OUMPH� [.• p NM..wla vrywolknYm /R.1mI of M •w^Gv^%�J AY TMJ M ShnAp By NOI.V] Mwk. Cxnf% MHnmM I Iwwr <nrny M.e I n.w w/.wlee mtl y.fntl m.;71. ..ewM.e v. m^ al.( o. smvsncln: m Iro. po(u a <w..n /w..mrmlm a fM .urw% Invl mY Malme.. a'. <n'rv<IIY xxn n del X x v.Jxln../ v Mf. M.ItW mwiunnN mX E. m+x(IY daW P M. P'Kn. x .Iwm, he va.wn 1. Mh+xol. Stvrul.4 Sxtkn ]OT OP. Nov. I' M.! IM .olb. Gwn. Y Ihx n. <w/.[fly xelptptM oMw MmLe M Mol w. w. m «Ym.. « MIM.O h M.1ox«f. RaINM p«Ilm 50.5.02 SiOI. I n pWk n.'pnwN 1. a. 6vp w Yw.. 1.., N . I.-. Na SMli AAW IF Wd5J1I coven M T. lavpbp Swwlo'. LNfPtol. .w xnnvWvawa MIw. m. MY � WY M XI . vY CMp w MVM Lmv Swrp'. NMuvty Lknf Na LL1/. N.ISY MbK C.vn 1Y NNmwfs MY C'aTM.MM [q CMWMB4IA MM[AZA Ilrb pbl vI SIMY ay vw epprewL m0 mplq EY M. It CauM9 vI Clunbum. NMwv10 vl a /pulmo fQWfM IMm/ MN Mk _ 0[y of 2O� m. k Ir y tIa n« MM (M1e pam SW vl MPnvxla SlafulM S<IM SOS p4 SOG. 3 IP mmwnml. MI M xl « q«IM..y 1M My Gw.p w. vv .fv1eE Mlv *It «evM$ fv YMnsla SIVWfM YvIM ]OS W. SW. I. on CYY.SQ a CIMNM9SD{ 9NiRIrA Py LCYMry £W1f1M. I- C-" M:.v.-I,I w„oml 1. mvvl« ]ps NmnuvM 1.- .l 1911 MM "If Xa Mn ipow. MM .1 a/ JOS H« G IS.NnNI. GM CwrrtY 9Nxp CpNn AM M. L no w.. T' M /a. pb 1. M' IM. .Ma9.tl ver IM pbf W bo..M .nlYq C.Ip IY.I. III�I�Y .I» I IQ J ey M.+ IUX.4M ebw L.Imer Awn> MNIr A(RFISR, Calver fuw.1% N mGy <nlily WI Ms fv+u pv]IXJa Imo M. pw 1p_ W MM N.nAM q'r NY pbl m SIMOYIO Raw bn MMm MI._WY .I )lI_. Ion .... Lsw C.0 M1epRYw NMryICC'OAi !R Caw Cxntn M mt, wMY ewlllY Mol Inh M., ./ sIMPIKIO - M. lnX fvY .I 2L� vl vtla@ M a. Ommnt Nq By Lbi N XTeI i.. Lbw LomIY Ruwan Westwood I PSofWonel SenkA.. Inc sn«I I oI ] mxl. J VI BBM•e9 I i pooAll;saM I ••I..Y°"'••� II r� T: Iwaii a e'I,ezer-o / `6l, •I I�� •n _r;^ In �.//r -.nl I _:.`.`v!r_/ _ ___t onrot,�/v v.^,nlvn�-,ii- � l •\-1.:.w.w m,.. ..z. I mm/�! as mu s« \ _ _� 1 u a -a - -- 1"".�,: '\ \\>a I I'' \pig Y to ; krc WWI 3.rtBa.wn r ma J n�'�i•I �I�� / 4w ^ t. \ er \>a :� \\ � I pw I � usvlrra.o v>"•1. r .:� � b i ``y Ie , �t 8 Irw� I I r`_ms\ aJ lfa _.ifyu.mw+ .. i I � I I / / _'•�'- .vomit' 'o I--�—\x1o�� n\\ mu.'+`.'v\\ / r�7 � I 71 b" / /y� i � I I \ / 1'� . v� vlw+ w rw of v� ••wr lw ewwCm vw° -- lrm wn -- i Ir--- off----- L—_ --J L------i''LJ j � I ,rj`'" nmwoe G+B+nw ww..y I I x I nmv I "'w'BBr la 4.oay.... �' 1 �� r I n.v-wr, w. w. yr •vo .. � .'•'i �.�, v tf /�- v` ,� wT�\, \i� �,�i ) ry r. 7 I 1,..,,�,'..,:°`Y..' wt' r'iv'es°r vi � Iw o O. jw+a//rte 6MW"G<I eV/wn1 •A/ YZ W1m51 /1/ IvuY1MY eW wl<T 1/M VI�^N Wl I<.wl 1WI1 eW •oa 710o dd 073/.43N01 S 'ON �i� 1 r7di S TONEF/EL D r0 p b IO Ses'° Yi ICO ♦� .I ma x° . '' 12'M tlR S. IVN I " K�r IrA41 riu11 ..l. r^ -_1 •1TNnn lrl nnl Vrp ITI`i qy AI RI x'rarl�'+�rrW ....Aw°AraA•e beA.aA... � 1 1 tP t� 1� A}A!J i G"Mep WV1MY Cwnrnl. en Non IMn.' 11 J Ls II ppFip Rp"f-°I-wy Ihm w Non m Nv pbr. . xnmwr amv °1 snrwx zx Iemnpn ,14Rnw ]; Gv� f my L o.,,r« r/p nN °, ,. xN w. •rro•xmmr o.,.m rn NN er Ix nN .m mmmrme /emG e'N mmie0 w Ncm C) c'�mroru— 7 Trri.��°. [ A� I f:) Uj bA U WeStWond flrofwsioml Smkn Int »wl 1 oI 1 N.vr ♦� .I x'rarl�'+�rrW rz>. � 1 1 tP t� 1� G"Mep WV1MY Cwnrnl. en Non IMn.' 11 J Ls II ppFip Rp"f-°I-wy Ihm w Non m Nv pbr. . xnmwr amv °1 snrwx zx Iemnpn ,14Rnw ]; Gv� f my L o.,,r« r/p nN °, ,. xN w. •rro•xmmr o.,.m rn NN er Ix nN .m mmmrme /emG e'N mmie0 w Ncm C) c'�mroru— 7 Trri.��°. [ A� I f:) Uj bA U WeStWond flrofwsioml Smkn Int »wl 1 oI 1 N.vr CITY OF 7700 Markel Boulevard PO Boz 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone. 952 227,1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.221.1404 Planning 8 Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 0 February 16, 2006 Mr. Nathan Franzen Plowshares Development, Inc. 1851 Lake Drive West, Suite 550 Chanhassen, MN 55317 40 Re: Development Notification Sign Escrow Refund Stonefield - Planning Case 05-37 Dear Mr. Franzen, Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $100 which represents a refund of the development notification sign escrow for the above -referenced project. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 952-227-1107 or by email at kmeuwisscn@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincerely, y Kim T. Meuwissen Planning Secretary KTM:ms Enclosure SCANNED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A greal place to live, work, and play. Vendor: PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT LLC Check Date: 02/16/2006 Vendor No: PloDev Vendor Acct No: Check Amount: $100.00 Invoice Number Date Description Invoice Amount DW6718 02/09/2006 Sign escrow 100.00 CITY CHANHASSEN M&1 MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK 128353 7700 MARKET BLVD., P.O. BOX 147 riiersio CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1140 Pay: ***One hundred dollars and Zero cents Date Amount 02/16/2006 $100.00 To the order of: PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT LLC (( ATTN: TODD SIMMING t 1851 LAKE DRIVE WEST #550 h CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 /day 0121335311' 1:09 100 1 1 5 71: 00257,11 7 7 3 1 211' J. :ITY OF CHANHASSEN • • '700 MARKET BLVD !HANHASSEN MN 55317 payee: PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT LLC )ate: 10/24/2005 Time: 2:57pm teceipt Number: DW / 6718 :lerk: DANIELLE iTONFIELD 05-37 ITEM REFERENCE AMOUNT ------------------------------------------- )EVAP STONFIELD 05-37 USE & VARIANCE 1,610.00 SIGN RENT 75.00 RECORDING FEES 450.00 REZONING 5 00 SIGN ESCROW 100.00 Total: --------------- 2,735.00 heck 11003 2,735.00 Change: --------------- 0.00 YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT! February 9, 2006 Please return the $100 sign escrow for this project. Please give the check to Kim for mailing. It Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director F- F g —__r�\ < I I— I I I I _ L — — J arasr.v rwaE \ I �� .•d.... mipF INY w w YY tWmr puLw) nmmy z..xe - x (rw x.:.rmm x+l v.+riv - .r Mm• Lme W. rb _ r3M1V 4x. n—I s r5.msx m bNmaxa LeM1 �+e Plowshares Development, Inc dPNER STATE ONE GAL � Preliminary Put TRANSMITTAL W Westwood Date: October 24, 2005 To: Sharmin AIJaff City of Chanhassen 6900 City Center Dr. P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 From: Curt Neft Regarding: Stonefield Proj. No.: 2005-1114 w.a..Rood Pmreaslm 7699 AW am Drive Eden Raine. MN 553" MUN 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5822 Teu FREE 14I88-937-5150 EMAIL Wp5�WM1'ACOIIRS.RN11 wx .*Vtwoodps.mm CITY OF CH RECE VEyASSEN OCT 2 4ZO CIygNHgN �SSFP10, CPT Items: No Description 16 Full Size Plan Revisions 1 11x17 1 &1/2x11 Purpose: Other (see remarks) Remarks: Please find the attached revised Preliminary plans for the Stonefield Development The electronic tiff files will be sent to you via email. It is our intention to submit without variances. If you do discover any variances please contact me at your earliest convenience at 952-906-7405. Thank you Delivery: Hand Deliver Copy to: Nathan Fanzen TWIN CITIESMIETRO ST. CLOUD RHAINERD tCAMNBp TRANSMITTAL Westwood Protessiorwl Services 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie. MN $5344 MAI. 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5822 TOLL rFrr 1-688-937-5150 EMAIL wps®.etwocdPzcom www.weslwoodps.mm Westwood Date: October 14, 2005 To: Sharmin AI-Jaff City of Chanhassen 6900 City Center Dr. P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 From: Curt Neft Regarding: Stonefield Preliminary Plat Proj. No.: 2005 -1114 -CO Items: No Description 26 full size preliminary plans (folded) 1 11x17 & 8/1/2x11 preliminary plan set 1 application w/application fee check 1 CD with tiff and pdf files of preliminary plan set 2 Drainage reports Purpose: Other (see remarks) Remarks: Please find the attached preliminary submittal for the Stonefield Development. If you have any questions or need additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 952-906-7405 Thank you Delivery: Hand Deliver Copy to: Nathan Frazen (2 full size, 11 x1 7 and application w/check) TWIN CITIESMETHO ST. CLOUD MAINEND CCAS, N FC Preliminary Plans Stonef field Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared for: Plowshares Developement, LLC. 1851 Lake Drive West Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Contact: Nathan Franzen Phone: 952-361-0832 Fax: 952-361-0833 Preporna by: ". Westwood Professional Services, Inc. n.n..uuunx w: mur.w. Project Number: 20051114.00 Co�laclCu,n. R, W1. VE CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED OCT 2 4 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Vicinity Map rm asn sev®ott v�Es 1D/xo(C� a.w.e v. Cary L 3 . NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Preliminary Plans I., Smnefleld cr..n., ui__ y I Y.s rav SCANNED Piip"D"W"brl 17 PM a• rya m. rwmw.r w.+. aw m. ".m.r o..r..r nµ as n.�ms "a •..S.M �w°i"'m _ Awam"„,w as -M °nw� a„a.0 i. ",Y'"Sn ."a"; 1 ".`."a° w. MP/[ ri 5 i% A dr/.eMS //%mwrv�w , Vmr +x mvep ro IM y°r mm, m M a., w"0" M.M sl m. Gw,Y Am"..r Cm"r95tan�n "",w,. ..,.,e., m."m+. w m. ".r d".., m ". , a w."e",.. aw a m. ,,.,. •"... ["_ wwr" OOW tl [,ar+ur m madww —t O ¢mwrs m p .m u[ ® aur5 [uu,am a _..... •� r 411H IAO. rxs O B www" —.•--. .ww ma • a wsr m "rtm wv ¢ m„rm wrr —� manr ouwen T av,-mru•q O ru[ ".mna w urw —.r ,q Rr ® mvu uw � en,rra[ +�.° mm1/x rvw (j ry w • n () E& GOPHER STATE ONE CALL rn ra�Ynnwr°em ui-w YWO map n LwHpHAe3EN I r w I Plowshares Development, LLC >n rr wa.. wr, wren \ —44\1\\\\ \ V Stonefield r 1 o n OCaNHeo I I 1 i I I 1 � i I •8 4,1 I � A — J m0.0e'lA'w 100.M DevskPp Aph 12 MrAA <w.na trmr Wxo la+' 3}b x. JO Maga MV(wW t1M Wa% xM amm�w. i la nlxw• eM N aM .a v�mly Iv nen rvr0 n r M NU' Nnlai i I� w.mna M N px�a•/ s muM Dy lnviPLu. n.0emi w my cvw.nouw, [v.« [min Ixxmie. v yr a Plowshares Development, LLC si's� .w Na aa. MnA eWl... CITY OF CHANHASSEN )F CHANHAP' RECEIVED RECEIVES OCT 2 4 2005 OCT CHANHASSEN PLANNI4 VPT CHANH' Stonefield CW 4 Xw• CCPNER STALE MONEE CALL N. m 1= eel w-aooee >rdimwry plat SCANNED MiM NO U womb ," MT 0 War Np !`- .�"1.__...�iii�bl�--� 1 � � � .,.III ■ Mor FOR C0NMUJW01V Plowshares Development, LLC. CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED OCT 2 4 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT _.- o u. WAUW w { 011 Stonefield e d min.*r Gr�ding, D ainW k &odon Control n.n s .NA, \ II IIS �_// \\ \ \ ��\ 1 I -11 IR> Q I'1 1 Q III 7 ANENR NA 1.1 L-.., (—, J I I T Imm • NNE SSEND ND I.A.nwS NERR ,o �D RIDES,a VqN / tlm. RR .Ra,.... REEN TS PER .0 wD.R RLYINNE ` t� L - — � `�- ... STYE .xi ED R mo10c'a,u°O1iED TYSRD R Mi ali'vl'�u-sll' rtR.Aw I 1"owTNEAATEESENASEELRAL,ENNAE. .SEE LREATIRE ER, u.rt.., .s _ iv wu1A,: EN �mn°tllol. r u .01 .10.1 r of I I NA. i µSo TONS' rzawiahS uw .111. a1.1u A DD."n . NDARNA I � / I 1 I , I MsiuuL. Ey 1111 cIl'E..' .c .".,A, l a uI.E..1m ro me / STANDENEYEA.. IL . uaaww EANTHE CAR cwsmucnwr uiTMi ml'inD`.cmn 0NiLL 0 RLWA2D ro rdlDw Nl MaEDURES �s DDNNED iv W LCGL ASEI. n 1< WRW / LLC. I I ^ I I I s .NA, \ II IIS �_// \\ \ \ ��\ 1 I -11 IR> Q I'1 1 Q III 7 ANENR NA 1.1 L-.., (—, J I I T Imm • NNE SSEND ND I.A.nwS NERR ,o �D RIDES,a VqN DSE, a ruri S tlm. RR .Ra,.... REEN TS PER .0 wD.R RLYINNE ` t� L - — � `�- ... STYE .xi ED R mo10c'a,u°O1iED TYSRD R Mi ali'vl'�u-sll' rtR.Aw I 1"owTNEAATEESENASEELRAL,ENNAE. .SEE LREATIRE ER, u.rt.., .s ALLRRR .R, ,Ne,m.�RnRL.R iv wu1A,: EN �mn°tllol. r u .01 .10.1 r of I NA. i µSo TONS' rzawiahS uw .111. a1.1u A DD."n . NDARNA TO 'STANDARD SANITARY SEAYI RT AND STSEA4 ES ar.n 1P MsiuuL. Ey 1111 cIl'E..' .c .".,A, l a uI.E..1m ro me STANDENEYEA.. IL . uaaww EANTHE CAR cwsmucnwr uiTMi ml'inD`.cmn 0NiLL 0 RLWA2D ro rdlDw Nl MaEDURES �s DDNNED iv W LCGL ASEI. n 1< I LLC. I I ^ I I I I I —J s .NA, \ II IIS �_// \\ \ \ ��\ 1 I -11 IR> Q I'1 1 Q III 7 ANENR NA 1.1 L-.., (—, J General UtWty Notes NNE SSEND ND I.A.nwS NERR ,o �D RIDES,a DSE, a ruri S tlm. RR .Ra,.... REEN TS PER .0 wD.R RLYINNE ar w noun. • SELL m A, ADE °u".wol,"rzc. •o.. ... STYE .xi ED R mo10c'a,u°O1iED TYSRD . wNr. IwSnN. n,.,Ae Lm . ar.. rRaR ro .Ns a0s0uen01. Mi ali'vl'�u-sll' rtR.Aw �a=.0 1"owTNEAATEESENASEELRAL,ENNAE. .SEE LREATIRE ER, u.rt.., .s ALLRRR .R, ,Ne,m.�RnRL.R iv wu1A,: EN �mn°tllol. r u .01 .10.1 r of DL1uR'..I > AD iws"."�:+Iw NA. i µSo TONS' rzawiahS uw .111. a1.1u A DD."n . NDARNA TO 'STANDARD SANITARY SEAYI RT AND STSEA4 ES ar.n 1P MsiuuL. Ey 1111 cIl'E..' .c .".,A, l a uI.E..1m ro me STANDENEYEA.. IL . uaaww EANTHE CAR cwsmucnwr uiTMi ml'inD`.cmn 0NiLL 0 RLWA2D ro rdlDw Nl MaEDURES �s DDNNED iv W LCGL ASEI. n 1< Plowshares Development, LLC. LLL 1J• M.• M•R. MY . a...... tll=..,eu Rtlo 13 CJ 0 xwn "N"' "NEI GOPHER STATE ONE CALL `,*iai'r,`..`i _°eao-zw 11-°0°zes PBS@ RATER —I— NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Stonefield II Aft. � lonuos1'�.Won PreRznlnny Utmty PLn SCANNED I "� W..N,,.d ft�." kI __ _ ' I .r"^ ' Plowshares Development, LLC ww 1494L! r �'o D Stonefield �.D ovn v v .rvv / xn5•.•e w $ ry�yvpn pl M [em a M IIIeY 'All Will M M NW W lI.Il"Ll Cpvnvp1 roh wF +-' -- wrEl! e e EA_ Vic%: :e.o AL, IS Wcry ..nM) M . 111 A.. ] m....) . rr llIl (l 1. X A. ax A.) a+ ] M «M..wn.n� «�IARl Me•u,sw s-zil v/wee) ri . many. r. N Ty« T. Pretvytion D tyll m� Nb� �N..NWe a.nny 1 ] Aerv.,e a—� ! erss 1w w..rwonan Yssa%Sxv,es.Inc. I :.."�"' +VNrs +1w P• ..I — u 1. EIII k;1.1. 1 LIZ an J uw uP NW , roh wF +-' -- w h]• . ]�w w w >o i ii. Nalar. quµ LE.Aw vrn All J' i w�u.a. fib W W y u. I LEA BE. All L w Y F.nue" T ILI I. a M ✓— s 1 ] Aerv.,e a—� ! erss 1w w..rwonan Yssa%Sxv,es.Inc. I :.."�"' +VNrs +1w P• ..I — u 1. EIII k;1.1. 1N aieui uw uP , +-' -- w . ]�w i ii. Nalar. quµ LE.Aw vrn {ILL � i w�u.a. fib W W y u. LEA BE. All L w Y F.nue" T �g I. a M ✓— s flIffil 1 ] Aerv.,e a—� ! erss 1w w..rwonan Yssa%Sxv,es.Inc. I :.."�"' +VNrs +1w ", ' Plowshares Development, LLC Stonefield Tm PreaQvetion A� «'• Inventory Plus SCANNED P• ..I — u 1. EIII Hn 1N aieui uw uP , 1 -- w . ]�w ii. Nalar. quµ LE.Aw {ILL ]b W W y u. LEA BE. All I Y F.nue" T ^nn ", ' Plowshares Development, LLC Stonefield Tm PreaQvetion A� «'• Inventory Plus SCANNED v q' Hn -r.M 0 Lim W , 1 -- :. mn « ]�w ii. Nalar. LE.Aw {ILL ]b LEA BE. All I Y F.nue" T ^nn I. a M ✓— s flIffil _ 11 LAIIAE IF G N _if A w n•n Ad Sy iLA o « Al Amr__ - swwN'�a• All 22 Alli �mn� Li , rir . newnv EL, a w. a , �. LEE r ", ' Plowshares Development, LLC Stonefield Tm PreaQvetion A� «'• Inventory Plus SCANNED v Hn -r.M 0 Lim W 1 ii. Nalar. ]b Y F.nue" T ^nn I. a M ✓— flIffil IF _if A n•n Ad Sy Fnnd o « • Amr__ swwN'�a• C ux s LEE r ..EIIIII aw r G HM STATE: ONE CALL n nN ea enN. esal.- r y.. A w ..�....� . ..ne.a o� s.w uw. yyr ", ' Plowshares Development, LLC Stonefield Tm PreaQvetion A� «'• Inventory Plus SCANNED STREET A Nor FOR CONSTRUCTION W"M Plowshares Development, Lm Stonefie d P� t Profue 1M We PIS. W. ed Mm�T WMEN Eua a m. uw w aw Dawm.° rNn n°w a.v. nsar ur ,w.w.r... SiiI1GCE�- I us cows I TYPICAL LOCAL STRBBT SHCTION (3r BACK TO HAM °afA 70 PLAN VEEEEE FCP DNNEEWsICX4NFEW EXACT VDEW.EN IOCATO ILA rewa ovm.. Nq m NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION "^ kowsham Development, LLC Stonefield en Ei Dlwl..,ri o.E� sew v srr C ER STAn ME CI w.. mnaias ren �o. a . PrellminerY Grading Details SCANNED A.C. a.. r°ew.rnww mu' °tl Mm�T WMEN Eua a m. uw w aw Dawm.° rNn n°w a.v. nsar ur ,w.w.r... SiiI1GCE�- I us cows I TYPICAL LOCAL STRBBT SHCTION (3r BACK TO HAM °afA 70 PLAN VEEEEE FCP DNNEEWsICX4NFEW EXACT VDEW.EN IOCATO ILA rewa ovm.. Nq m NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION "^ kowsham Development, LLC Stonefield en Ei Dlwl..,ri o.E� sew v srr C ER STAn ME CI w.. mnaias ren �o. a . PrellminerY Grading Details SCANNED Date: October 21, 2005 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planting Department By: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner Subject: STONEFIELD — Request for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A-2, to Single Family Residential, RSF; Subdivision review for 30 Lots, 1 Outiot and public right-of-way with Variances; on property located at 1601 Lyman Boulevard. Applicant: Plowshares Development, LLC. Planning Case: 05-37 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on October 14, 2005. The 60 -day review period ends December 13, 2005. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on November 15, 2005 at 7:00 p.m in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than November 4, 2005. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services S. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or SprintfUnited) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco se"Wo Carver County GIS Mapping Application 1Ple ��+�►ter :ter*n �%ti1► - r■�t�`d M Xap 1. �cnd Raad Teat US HigMays 0 HigMays N ts,H Map Created on: County R4 10-21-2005 utasCarver Panels County ,enal Pt 2047 This map was created using Carver County's Geographic Information Systems (GIS), it is a compilation of information and data from various City, County, State, and Federal offices. This map is not a surveyed or legally recorded map and is intended to be used as a reference. Carver County is not responsible for any inaccuracies contained herein. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Payee: PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT LLC Date: 10/24/2005 Time: 2:57pm Receipt Number: DW / 6718 Clerk: DANIELLE STONFIELD 05-37 ITEM REFERENCE AMOUNT ------------------------------------------- DEVAP STONFIELD 05-37 USE & VARIANCE 1,610.00 SIGN RENT 75.00 RECORDING FEES 450.00 REZONING 500.00 SIGN ESCROW 100.00 --------------- Total: 2,735.00 Check 11003 2,735.00 --------------- Change: 0.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT! SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 05-37 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, November 15, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Rezoning and Subdivision with Variances on property located at 1601 Lyman Boulevard — STONEhIELD. Applicant: Plowshares Development, LLC. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner Email: saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1134 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on November 3, 2005) NCMNnD Prepared for: Prepared by: PRELIMINARY STORM WATER RUNOFF CALCULATIONS Stonefield Chanhassen, MN Plowshares Development, LLC. 1851 Lake Drive West, Suite 550 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone (952) 937-5150, Fax (952) 937-5822 October 14, 2005 Project # 2005-1114.00 SCANNED SUMMARY The attached storm water runoff and ponding calculations are based on Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) and The Soil Conservation Service Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Method incorporated into the software program Hydraflow by Intelisolve, version 7.10. An existing pond located on the east property boundary was expanded into the project to provide additional flood and treatment storage to provide both rate control and quality control for the proposed development. The goal for rate control on this project was not to exceed existing discharge rates for the 10 and 100 -year events. The goal for quality control was to obtain a phosphorus removal efficiency of 60% or greater for the storm water contributed by the property by using "PONDNET" by William Walker. SITE CONDITIONS The site consists of Type "B" soils, and curve numbers were obtained from "Technical Release 55: Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds." A curve number of 55 was used for the existing condition of woods, 70 for existing residential, 78 for crops, 98 for impervious surfaces, 61 for maintained grass and 74 for farmstead. For the proposed conditions a curve number of 72 was used for residential single-family development. Refer to attachments for existing and proposed drainage areas. ROUTING Under existing conditions, 94.85 acres of existing development drains to an existing storm water pond system ultimately discharging to a ravine located along the southeast boundary of the site. Another 3.64 acres of existing development and open area drains to an existing temporary pond discharging to the ravine and the remaining 26.28 acres surface drains directly to the existing ravine. Under post -development conditions, 96.78 acres of existing development and 21.49 acres of diverted offsite drainage and proposed development drain to an existing storm water pond system expanded for the proposed development and discharged to the existing ravine. The remaining 6.55 acres of rear yard area surface drains directly to the ravine. RATE CONTROL An evaluation was made for both the pre -development and post -development peak runoff rates for the entire site. By diverting 23.42 additional acres of drainage to the storm water pond system and installing an additional 33" outlet to the expanded pond the peak runoff rates were within rate control requirements. The following is a table summarizing pre -development and post -development peak runoff rates for the 10 -year, and 100 -year storms: PEAK RUNOFF RATES Pre -Development Post -Development Drainage 10 yr 100 yr 10 yr 100 yr cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs Existing Temporary 4.61 7.76 -- Pond Existing Pond System 43.64 116.08 49.14 108.10 Surface Drainage 27.16 55.53 4.81 11.07 Directly to Ravine Peak Discharge to 50.77 135.36 50.40 110.97 Ravine 'The peak discharge to ravine flows were determined by combining all the discharge hydrographs into a reach to account for time lag differences. * WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. (952) 937-5150 SUMMARY The following is a table summarizing the rate control pond system: Pond Drainage NWL Dead 100 -yr Live 100 -yr 100 -yr Overflow Area (feet) Storage HWL Storage Inflow Discharge Elevation (acrel (acre-feet) (feet) (acre-feet) (cfs) (cfs) (feet) Existing 94.85 917.0 2.70 920.1 4.50 136.42 116.08 918.8 Pond Proposed 118.27 917.0 5.15 920.9 7.05 163.15 108.10 921.0 Pond WATER QUALITY The PONDNET model was used to determine the phosphorus removal efficiency of the proposed pond. The added pond phosphorus loading is 55.2 lbs/yr and the increase in removal is 44.4 lbs/yr providing a removal efficiency for the proposed development of 80.4% I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Curtis R. Neft, P.E. License. No. 44198 /awq / 05 Date * WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. (952) 937-5150 .2005 WW..o 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 M I Westwood Rofessiorul Services, Inc. I'N nf/LLS �.. 441l4 .- ....,tip I -NOS• _... owe Prtpasel �' Plowshares Development, LLC 1651 I.Ee rh;.e w� — menb� Mlmmn 5630 MM Cdl b N. before dlggnq: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Tv My ergo 651-454-0002 W. TO Free 1-800-252-1166 0' 200 400' 600' Ism 10/14/05 sbc 1 of 2 StonefieldI Pre -Developed Drainage Areas 02005 We twc E Profend So ces. Inc. Call � H.. before fpgNg: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 5 n 600' wzo«c P i DA -2 DA -1 TEMP DRA AGE EXI TING DEVE OPMENT 2P DA 5 P-7 EXISTING TEM POND DA -4 POST EXISTING EXISTI G POND DEV LOPMENT PROPOSED GEO PROPERTY DA -3 EXISTING GOERS 3P PROPERTY , PROPOSE POND PRE COMBINED is PROPOSED GOER REAR YARDS 2R POST COMBINED Drainage Diagram for 05-10-14 Sulxa Reacnon Link Prepared by {enter your company name here} 10/14/2005 HydroCADO 7.10 s/n 002351 © 2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 05-10-14 Type 1124 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Page 2 Subcatchment DA -1: EXISTING DEVELOPMENT Runoff = 67.77 cfs @ 12.69 hrs, Volume= 10.205 af, Depth> 1.29" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" Area (ac) CN Description 85.260 70 1/2 acre lots, 25% imp, HSG B 7.510 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 2.080 98 Paved roads w/curbs & sewers 94.850 70 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Description 61.8 1,600 0.0100 0.4 Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment DA -2: TEMP DRAINAGE Runoff = 8.82 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.441 af, Depth> 1.45" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" Area (ac) CN Description 2.380 70 1/2 acre lots, 25% imp, HSG B 0.770 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.490 98 Paved roads w/curbs & sewers 3.640 72 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity iin) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) 9.8 455 0.0480 0.8 Description Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment DA -3: EXISTING GOERS PROPERTY Runoff = 27.16 cfs @ 12.32 hrs, Volume= 2.730 af, Depth> 1.25" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" Area (ac) CN Description 1.030 70 1/2 acre lots, 25% imp, HSG B 5.210 74 Farmsteads, HSG B 6.210 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 10.570 78 Row crops, straight row, Good, HSG B 3.260 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 26.280 69 Weighted Average 05-10-14 eared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. )CAD& 7.10 s/n 002351 @ 2005 HydroCAD Software Solutio Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 34.3 1,650 0.0360 Inflow Area = 124.770 ac, Inflow = 50.77 cfs @ Outflow = 50.77 cfs @ 0.8 Lag/CN Method, Type 11 24 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" Page 3 Reach 1R: PRE COMBINED Inflow Depth > 1.18" for 10 -year event 13.12 hrs, Volume= 12.219 of 13.12 hrs, Volume= 12.219 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt-- 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 923.78'@ 12.14 hrs Surf.Area= 5,374 sf Storage= 5,122 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 31.1 min calculated for 0.426 of (97% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 19.4 min ( 823.6 - 804.3 ) _Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 922.50' 13,250 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic�isted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 922.50 2,600 0 0 925.00 8,000 13,250 13,250 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 922.50' 18.0" x 65.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 922.25' S= 0.0038'P Cc= 0.900 n=0.013 #2 Primary 924.60' 4.0' long x 3.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Coef. (English) 2.44 2.58 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.68 2.68 2.72 2.81 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=4.58 cfs @ 12.14 hrs HW=923.78' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 4.58 cfs @ 3.8 fps) L 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) Pond 2P: EXISTING TEMP POND Inflow Area = 3.640 ac, Inflow Depth > 1.45" for 10 -year event Inflow = 8.82 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.441 of Outflow = 4.61 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.427 af, Atten= 48%, Lag= 7.3 min Primary = 4.61 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.427 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt-- 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 923.78'@ 12.14 hrs Surf.Area= 5,374 sf Storage= 5,122 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 31.1 min calculated for 0.426 of (97% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 19.4 min ( 823.6 - 804.3 ) _Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 922.50' 13,250 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic�isted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 922.50 2,600 0 0 925.00 8,000 13,250 13,250 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 922.50' 18.0" x 65.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 922.25' S= 0.0038'P Cc= 0.900 n=0.013 #2 Primary 924.60' 4.0' long x 3.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Coef. (English) 2.44 2.58 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.68 2.68 2.72 2.81 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=4.58 cfs @ 12.14 hrs HW=923.78' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 4.58 cfs @ 3.8 fps) L 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) 05-10-14 Type 1124 -hr 10 year Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Page 4 HydroCAD& 7.10 s/n 002351 @ 2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/14/2005 Pond P-1: EXISTING POND Inflow Area = 94.850 ac, Inflow Depth > 1.29" for 10 -year event Inflow = 67.77 cfs @ 12.69 hrs, Volume= 10.205 of Outflow = 43.64 cfs @ 13.16 hrs, Volume= 9.062 af, Atten= 36%, Lag= 28.0 min Primary = 43.64 cfs @ 13.16 hrs, Volume= 9.062 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 919.30'@ 13.16 hrs Surf.Area= 71,736 sf Storage= 138,832 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 85.4 min calculated for 9.062 of (89% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 52.0 min ( 898.9 - 846.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 917.00' 363,450 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic�isted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 917.00 50,400 0 0 918.00 58,420 54,410 54,410 920.00 78,950 137,370 191,780 922.00 92,720 171,670 363,450 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 916.96' 48.0" x 17.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 916.89' S=0.0041? Cc= 0.900 n=0.013 #2 Primary 918.83' 20.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 Primary OutFlow Max=43.59 cfs @ 13.16 hrs HW=919.30' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 27.22 cfs @ 5.1 fps) L 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir(Weir Controls 16.37 cfs @ 1.8 fps) 05-10-14 Type 1124 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Page 5 HydroCAD® 7.10 s/n 002351 @ 2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/14/2005 Subcatchment DA -1: EXISTING DEVELOPMENT Runoff = 136.42 cfs @ 12.67 hrs, Volume= 19.886 af, Depth> 2.52" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN Description 85.260 70 1/2 acre lots, 25% imp, HSG B 7.510 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 2.080 98 Paved roads w/curbs & sewers 94.850 70 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 61.8 1,600 0.0100 0.4 Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment DA -2: TEMP DRAINAGE Runoff = 16.64 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.835 af, Depth> 2.75" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN Description 2.380 70 1/2 acre lots, 25% imp, HSG B 0.770 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.490 98 Paved roads w/curbs & sewers 3.640 72 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 9.8 455 0.0480 0.8 Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment DA -3: EXISTING GOERS PROPERTY Runoff = 55.53 cfs @ 12.31 hrs, Volume= 5.382 af, Depth> 2.46" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN Description 1.030 70 1/2 acre lots, 25% imp, HSG B 5.210 74 Farmsteads, HSG B 6.210 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 10.570 78 Row crops, straight row, Good, HSG B 3.260 61 >75% Grass cover. Good. HSG B 26.280 69 Weighted Average 05-10-14 Type// 24 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Page 6 HydroCAD@ 7.10 s/n 002351 © 2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/14/2005 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (fUft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 34.3 1,650 0.0360 0.8 Lag/CN Method, Reach 1R: PRE COMBINED Inflow Area = 124.770 aq Inflow Depth > 2.36" for 100 -year event Inflow = 135.36 cfs @ 12.87 hrs, Volume= 24.576 of Outflow = 135.36 cfs @ 12.87 hrs, Volume= 24.576 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Pond 2P: EXISTING TEMP POND Inflow Area = 3.640 aq Inflow Depth > 2.75" for 100 -year event Inflow = 16.64 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.835 of Outflow = 7.76 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.817 af, Atten= 53%, Lag= 8.1 min Primary = 7.76 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.817 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 924.55'@ 12.15 hrs Surf.Area= 7,037 sf Storage= 9,897 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 26.7 min calculated for 0.817 of (98% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 18.3 min ( 809.2 - 790.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 922.50' 13,250 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)_isted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 922.50 2,600 0 0 925.00 8,000 13,250 13,250 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 922.50' 18.0" x 65.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 922.25' S=0.00387' Cc= 0.900 n=0.013 #2 Primary 924.60' 4.0' long x 3.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Coef. (English) 2.44 2.58 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.68 2.68 2.72 2.81 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=7.75 cfs @ 12.15 hrs HW=924.55' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 7.75 cfs @ 4.4 fps) L 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) 05-10-14 Type 1124 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Page 7 HydroCAD® 7.10 s/n 002351 © 2005 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/14/2005 Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 920.05'@ 12.92 hrs Surf.Area= 79,301 sf Storage= 195,820 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 57.9 min calculated for 18.316 of (92% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 34.0 min ( 868.1 - 834.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Pond P-1: EXISTING POND Inflow Area = 94.850 ac, Inflow Depth > 2.52" for 100 -year event Inflow = 136.42 cfs @ 12.67 hrs, Volume= 19.886 of Outflow = 116.08 cfs @ 12.92 hrs, Volume= 18.377 af, Atten= 15%, Lag= 15.1 min Primary = 116.08 cfs @ 12.92 hrs, Volume= 18.377 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 920.05'@ 12.92 hrs Surf.Area= 79,301 sf Storage= 195,820 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 57.9 min calculated for 18.316 of (92% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 34.0 min ( 868.1 - 834.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 917.00' 363,450d Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)_isted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 917.00 50,400 0 0 918.00 58,420 54,410 54,410 920.00 78,950 137,370 191,780 922.00 92,720 171,670 363,450 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 916.96' 48.0" x 17.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 916.89' S= 0.0041 'P Cc= 0.900 n=0.013 #2 Primary 918.83' 20.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 Primary OutFlow Max=115.86 cfs @ 12.92 hrs HW=920.05' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 44.28 cfs @ 5.9 fps) 2= Rectangular Weir(Weir Controls 71.58 cfs @ 2.9 fps) 05-10-14 Type Il 24 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Page 8 Subcatchment 1S: PROPOSED REAR YARDS Runoff = 4.81 cfs @ 12.35 hrs, Volume= 0.521 af, Depth> 0.95" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" Area (ac) CN Description 0.600 98 Paved parking & roofs 3.330 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 2.620 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B 6.550 64 Weighted Average Tc Length Capacity Description 35.1 800 0.0140 0.4 Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment DA -4: PROPOSED PROPERTY Runoff = 26.85 cfs @ 12.27 hrs, Volume= 2.463 af, Depth> 1.38" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" Area (ac) CN Descriotion 14.070 72 1/3 acre lots, 30% imp, HSG B 5.210 74 Farmsteads, HSG B 2.210 61 >75% Grass cover. Good. HSG B 21.490 71 Weighted Average Tc Length Description 30.6 1,450 0.0330 0.8 Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment DA -5: POST EXISTING DEVELOPMENT Runoff = 69.15 cfs @ 12.69 hrs, Volume= 10.413 af, Depth> 1.29" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" Area (ac) CN Description 85.260 70 1/2 acre lots, 25% imp, HSG B 2.580 98 Paved parking & roofs 8.940 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 96.780 70 Weighted Average 05-10-14 Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. HydroCAD@ 7.10 s/n 002351 @ 2005 HVdroCAD Software Solutio Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 61.8 1,600 0.0100 0.4 Lag1CN Method, Type 1124 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" Page 9 Reach 2R: POST COMBINED Inflow Area = 124.820 aq Inflow Depth > 1.18" for 10 -year event Inflow = 50.40 cfs @ 13.15 hrs, Volume= 12.230 of Outflow = 50.40 cfs @ 13.15 hrs, Volume= 12.230 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 919.34'@ 13.16 hrs Surf.Area= 80,024 sf Storage= 170,715 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 75.0 min calculated for 11.709 of (91% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 46.7 min ( 888.8 - 842.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description Pond 3P: PROPOSED POND Inflow Area = 118.270 aq Inflow Depth > 1.31" for 10 -year event Inflow = 80.96 cfs @ 12.60 hrs, Volume= 12.876 of Outflow = 49.14 cfs @ 13.16 hrs, Volume= 11.709 af, Atten= 39%, Lag= 33.6 min Primary = 49.14 cfs @ 13.16 hrs, Volume= 11.709 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 919.34'@ 13.16 hrs Surf.Area= 80,024 sf Storage= 170,715 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 75.0 min calculated for 11.709 of (91% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 46.7 min ( 888.8 - 842.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 917.00' 315,586d Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)-isted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 917.00 67,595 0 0 918.00 71,131 69,363 69,363 920.00 84,394 155,525 224,888 921.00 97,001 90,698 315,586 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 917.00' 48.0" x 17.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 916.89' S= 0.0065'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.013 #2 Primary 921.00' 20.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #3 Primary 917.00' 33.0" x 15.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 916.90' S= 0.0067 'P Cc= 0.900 n=0.013 PrimaryOutFlow Max=49.12 cfs @ 13.16 hrs HW=919.34' (Free Discharge) � 1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 28.12 cfs @ 5.3 fps) 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) 3=Culvert (Barrel Controls 21.00 cfs @ 5.2 fps) 05-10-14 Type fl 24 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Page 10 Subcatchment 1S: PROPOSED REAR YARDS Runoff = 11.07 cfs @ 12.32 hrs, Volume= 1.108 af, Depth> 2.03" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN Description 0.600 98 Paved parking & roofs 3.330 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 2.620 60_ Woods, Fair, HSG B 6.550 64 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity min) (feet) (fUft) (ft/sec) 35.1 800 0.0140 0.4 Description Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment DA -4: PROPOSED PROPERTY Runoff = 52.74 cfs @ 12.26 hrs, Volume= 4.727 af, Depth> 2.64" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN Descriotion 14.070 72 1/3 acre lots, 30% imp, HSG B 5.210 74 Farmsteads, HSG B 2.210 61 >75% Grass cover. Good. HSG B 21.490 71 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Description 30.6 1,450 0.0330 0.8 Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment DA -5: POST EXISTING DEVELOPMENT Runoff = 139.19 cfs @ 12.67 hrs, Volume= 20.291 af, Depth> 2.52" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN Descriotion 85.260 70 1/2 acre lots, 25% imp, HSG B 2.580 98 Paved parking & roofs 8.940 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 96.780 70 Weighted Average 05-10-14 Type// 24 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00' Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Page 11 HvdroCADO 7.10 s/n 002351 @ 2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/14/2005 Tc min) Length (feet) Slope (ft/ft) Velocity (ft/sec) 61.8 1,600 0.0100 0.4 Description Lag/CN Method, Reach 2R: POST Inflow Area = 124.820 ac, Inflow Depth > 2.37" for 100 -year event Inflow = 110.97 cfs @ 13.04 hrs, Volume= 24.606 of Outflow = 110.97 cfs @ 13.04 hrs, Volume= 24.606 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Pond 3P: PROPOSED POND Inflow Area = 118.270 ac, Inflow Depth > 2.54" for 100 -year event Inflow = 163.15 cfs @ 12.57 hrs, Volume= 25.017 of Outflow = 108.10 cfs @ 13.06 hrs, Volume= 23.498 af, Atten= 34%, Lag= 29.5 min Primary = 108.10 cfs @ 13.06 hrs, Volume= 23.498 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 920.91'@ 13.06 hrs Surf.Area= 95,887 sf Storage= 307,065 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 59.9 min calculated for 23.420 of (94% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 40.0 min ( 869.3 - 829.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 917.00' 315,586 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic�isted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 917.00 67,595 0 0 918.00 71,131 69,363 69,363 920.00 84,394 155,525 224,888 921.00 97,001 90,698 315,586 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 917.00' 48.0" x 17.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 916.89' S= 0.0065'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.013 #2 Primary 921.00' 20.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #3 Primary 917.00' 33.0" x 15.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 916.90' S= 0.0067/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.013 PrimaryOutFlow Max=108.06 cfs @ 13.06 hrs HW=920.91' (Free Discharge) � 1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 66.04 cfs @ 6.7 fps) 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) 3=Culvert (Barrel Controls 42.02 cfs @ 7.1 fps) PROJECT TITLE: PROJECT NO.: DESIGNED BY: DESIGNED DATE: Stonefield 2005-1014.00 Curtis Neft October 14. 2005 Existing Storm Water Pond System Station Contour Distance Feet Sq. Ft. Area Ac. Area Ac -ft Storage Comm. Stora e 914 28,657.00 0.66 2 1.63 1.63 916 42,727.00 0.98 1 1.07 2.70 917 50,400.00 1.16 1 1.25 3.94 918 58,420.00 1.34 2 3.14 7.09 920 78,950.00 1.81 2 3.94 11.02 922 92,720.00 2.13 TOTAL 1 11.02 12.39 Proposed Storm Water Pond Svstem Station Contour Distance Feet Sq. Ft. Area Ac. Area Ac -ft Storage Comm. Stora e 912 15,691.00 0.36 2 1.36 1.36 914 46,134.00 1.06 2 2.36 3.72 916 56,959.00 1.31 1 1.43 5.15 917 67,595.00 1.55 1 1.59 6.74 918 71,131.00 1.63 2 3.57 10.31 920 84,394.00 1.94 1 2.08 12.39 921 97,001.00 2.23 TOTAL 12.39 PONDNET 2.1 W. Walker March 1989 INPUT VARIABLES.... case labels watershed area runoff coefficient pond surface area pond mean depth upstream pond p load upstream pond outflow OUTPUT VARIABLES FLOW AND PHOSPHORUS ROUTING IN POND NETWORKS Press ALT -G for Graphs TITLE-> UNITS acres acres feet lbs/yr ac-ft/yr outflow p load lbs/yr outflow volume ac-fUyr outflow p conc ppb pond removal % total removal % ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS period length yrs period precipitation inches runoff total p ppb runoff ortho p/total p ac-ft/yr relative decay rate lbs/yr unit runoff in/yr unit export lbs/ac-y POND WATER BUDGETS runoff ac-ft/yr upstream pond ac-ft/yr total inflow ac-fUyr outflow ac-ft/yr POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS Existing Pond 94.85 0.4 1.16 2.32 0 0 runoff lbs/yr upstream pond lbs/yr total inflow lbs/yr net sedimentation lbs/yr outflow lbs/yr HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS pond volume acre -ft vlawmo pond volume acre -ft relative volume inches residence time years residence time days overflow rate ft/yr inflow phos conc ppb outflow phos conc ppb p reaction rate 1-rp 114.75 126.47 333.84 48.64 48.64 0.5 20 650 0.3 1 16 2.36 126.47 0.00 126.47 126.47 223.44 0.00 223.44 108.69 114.75 2.69 7.90 0.85 0.02 7.77 109.02 650.03 333.84 1.84 0.51 Proposed Pond 118.27 0.4 1.55 3.24 0 0 125.56 157.69 292.96 54.93 54.93 0.5 20 650 0.3 1 16 2.36 157.69 0.00 157.69 157.69 276.61 0.00 278.61 153.05 125.56 5.02 9.86 1.27 0.03 11.62 101.74 650.03 292.96 2.70 0.45 CIIIOF MEMORANDUM CgANgASSEN TO: Sharmeen AL -Jaff, Senior Planner 7700 Market Boulevard FROM: Mak Sweidan, Engineer PO Boz 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 DATE: November 7, 2005 Administration Phone: 952.227 1100 SUBJ: Preliminary Plat Review of Stonefield Fax: 952.227.1110 Land Use Review File No. 05-11 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Upon review of the plans submitted by Westwood, Inc., dated October 10, 2005, I Engineering offer the following comments and recommendations: Phone: 952 227.1160 Fax: 952.2271170 GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL Finance Phone: 952.227 1140 The site area is about 17.60 acres and has tree cover over approximately 4.69 Fax 952.227 1110 acres (27%) of the parcel with a variety of grade changes. The site elevations Park & Recreation range from a high of 970± to a low of 912±. These severe elevation differences Phone 952.227.1120 make it challenging to both develop and minimize grading on this site. The plans Fax: 952.227.1118 propose to grade about 80% of the site for 30 new house pads, a proposed street Recreation Center and enlarging an existing stormwater pond. The proposed grading will prepare 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 the site for full basement and walk -out type house pads. Retaining walls are Fax: 952.227.1404 proposed throughout the site due to the severe elevation differences and to create the house pads. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a Planning a Natural Resources registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must Phone: 952.2271130 be obtained. Retaining walls within drainage and utility easements must be Fax: 952.227.1110 minimized, however, staff understands that this may not be feasible, therefore, Public works encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public 1591 Park Road easement. Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1318 The existing site drainage is encompassed within almost one drainage area. Senior Center Under existing conditions, the site drains from the north and west sides to the east Phone: 9522271125 to an existing wetland along the southeast side of the property line. Under Fax 952.227 1110 developed conditions, the applicant is proposing to capture all of the street Web site drainage, all of the frontyard drainage, and some rearyard drainage from the www.ci.chanhassen.mo.us interior lots. This stormwater will be conveyed via storm sewer to an existing pond in the northeast comer of the site for treatment. The existing stormwater pond was designed to treat much of the site drainage areas adjacent to the parcel from the north and northeast sides. Since the applicant is proposing to enlarge the existing stormwater pond to accommodate the additional drainage generated from the proposed site, the enlargement must be designed to City standards and coordinated and approved by the City's Water Resources Coordinator. The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Sharmeen AI-7aff November 7, 2005 Page 2 Drainage calculations for the site have been submitted and some changes must be made. The applicant is required to meet the existing site peak runoff rates for the 10 -year and 100 -year, 24-hour storm events. Storm sewer sizing calculations with drainage map must be submitted at the time of final plat application. The storm sewer must be sized for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 - year flood level. Proposed erosion control must be developed in accordance with the MPCA's best management practices. Staff recommends that Type H silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, to be used adjacent to the existing wetland, existing creek area, and around the pond. In addition, tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. Erosion control blankets are required for all 3:1 slopes with an elevation change of eight feet or more. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. The applicant should be aware that any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. UTILITIES Municipal water service is available to the site from Osprey Lane and sewer is available at the Bluebill Trail and Osprey Lane intersection. The water and sewer mains will be extended south from Osprey Lane to serve the site and stubbed at the southwest comer of the parcel for future extension to the west. Due to the topography of the site and the elevation of the existing sanitary sewer, the site can not be served by a gravity sanitary sewer system, therefore, a lift station is proposed between Lot 4, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 3. The lift station is not identified on the Trunk Sanitary Sewer System map, or in the capital improvement plan, therefore, the developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and installation of the lift station and force -main. The lift station and forcemain must meet the City's minimum requirements. The developer is responsible for any additional work required to install the lift station and forcemain, including, but not limited to dewatering costs, grading, subgrade correction and signal tests. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,955.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,525.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. Sharmeen Al-Jaff November 7, 2005 Page 3 All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Upon completion and final acceptance of the utility improvements, the City will own and maintain these utilities. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. The developer must obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health and Carver County. Once the executed development contract, securities, fees and permits have been submitted, a preconstruction meeting must be held before grading and/or utility construction can begin. STREETS The plans show Osprey Lane within two right-of-ways, 50 -foot and 60 -foot wide, so that the property lines are a consistent distance from the back of the curb. The plans propose one full access to the site off of Osprey Lane from the north. The proposed public street complies with the minimum required right-of-way and pavement width. A temporary cul-de-sac turnaround for emergency vehicles will be required at the southwest end of the proposed street along with a "dead end road" sign. The temporary cul-de-sac must be minimum 91 -foot diameter to facilitate the turning movement of emergency vehicles. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The applicant will be required to meet the existing site runoff rates for 10 -year and 100 -year, 24-hour storm events. The proposed enlargement of the existing stormwater pond must be designed to meet the City's minimum standards and coordinated and approved by the City Water Resources Coordinator. 2. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations and a full size drainage map must be submitted with the final plat for staff review and approval. Sharmeen Al-Jaff November 7, 2005 Page 4 3. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood level. 4. Staff recommends that Type II silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, be used adjacent to the existing wetland, existing creek area, and around the proposed pond. In addition, tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. Erosion control blankets are recommended for all of the steep 3:1 slopes with an elevation change of eight feet or more. All plans must be signed by a registered Civil Engineer in the State of Minnesota. 6. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health, Carver County and the Williams Pipe Line Company. 7. The developer must obtain a written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. 8. On the utility plan: a. Show all the proposed storm sewer pipe type, size and class. b. Show the sanitary sewer pipe slope and class. c. Show watermain pipe class (C900). d. Add a storm sewer schedule. e. Show the existing storm sewer between Lots 1 & 2, Block 1 within the center of the 20 -foot utility easement. L Connect the existing apron east of Lot 2, Blockl to the proposed catch basin. g. Show the stormwater manholes rim and invert elevations. h. Add a note to remove the temporary pond outlet control structure. i. The last street accessible storm manhole discharging to the stormwater pond must be manhole with sump. j. Add a note: any connection to an existing structure must be core drilled. 9. On the grading plan: a. Show silt fence Type II adjacent to wetland, pond, creeks, etc. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Use class 5 storm sewer in the roadway; revise the note under general grading and drainage notes accordingly. d. Extend the swale between Lots 1 & 2, Block 4 further to the east. Sharmeen Al-Jaff November 7, 2005 Page 5 10. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. In addition, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. 11. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,955.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,525.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. 12. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 13. Any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. 14. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. 15. The developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and construction of the lift station and forcemain and any associated costs. 16. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 17. A 91 -foot diameter cul-de-sac turnaround for emergency vehicles will be required at the southwest end of the proposed street along with a "dead end road" sign. 18. On the plat, show all existing and proposed street names. 19. Add City Detail Plate Nos. 1001, 1002, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1009, 2001, 2 10 1, 2109, 2110, 2201, 2204, 3101, 3102, 3104, 3106, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5200, 5203, 5204, 5206, 5214, 5215, 5216, 5217, 5221, 5232, 5234, 5240, 5241, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A and 5313. 20. Show the street lights and a stop sign on the plans. Sharmeen Al-Jaff November 7, 2005 Page 6 21. Submit public utility plans and profile for staff review. 22. Show a taper between the 50 -foot and 60 -foot right-of-way for Osprey Lane and revise the property lines in consistent distance from the back of the curb accordingly. C: Paul Oehme, Public Works Director/City Engineer Alyson Moms, Assistant City Engineer gAeng\projects\stonefieI ftpr.doc 60' HOUSE PAD DATUM ELEV \ 902.00 GROUP Quick Section SECTION LOT 8, BLOCK 3 60' HOUSE PAD DATUM ELEV 906.00 GROUP Quick Section SECTION LOT 9, BLOCK 3 60' HOUSE PAD DATUM ELEV 900.00 GROUP Quick Section SECTION LOT 10, BLOCK 3 60' HOUSE PAD DATUM ELEV 936.00 GROUP Quick Section SECTION LOT 11, BLOCK 3 60' HOUSE PAD DATUM ELEV - 942.00 GROUP Quick Section SECTION LOT 12, BLOCK 3 lq�lli& I . 1 .9 ji 54 Ak Is -Oft 40 J LL Aw +.. 7.7 R p •'K t. wa, . Ys` Y, Vf J' 4 4W I J1. w 6 ��•au y�+y I�� p �i ``}�� j I e �t ia�,. K �yi-'1 N �rl 4�y �- 6d W f \'. L �S L, f � ;L• � � y■ t+ .� r' I i II _: F- i �::� ,�� . ,�YL-1-'� �. Af##CS" 3•M — WARRANTY DEED (Top 3 inches Reserved for Recording Data) Mlller/Davls Co. O St. Paul, MN 851-042.1958 Individual(s) to Corporation, Partnership or Limited Liability Company Miumota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks (6/1/97) DEED TAX DUE: $_— S, 011 D. (1L Date: _-- April Z I , 2o06 FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, William J. (;pare andyjcky L_ (;cers hushandand Wilk_.. _ . _. ----- — (marital stanM)— Grantor, hereby conveys and warrants to Plowshares_Develnpment Inc - Grantee, a _____ corporation — under the laws of the State of Minnesota real property in Cam ec _ County, Minnesota, described as follows: See Exhibit A attached hereto together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto, subject to the following exceptions: — _— S=,EKhjbiL&attachedhereio _ _--- — eck box if applicable: The Seller certifies that the seller does not know of any wells on the described real property. A well disclosure certificate accompanies this document. ❑ I am familiar with the property described in this instrument and I certify that the status and number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last previously certificate. �filed Hdisclosure dwwell �� William J. oars t��— Affix Deed Tax Stamp Herej STATE OFMyfNESOTA Vicky L. Goers - —i COUNTY OF.( --Cr u f{ -- This instrument was acknowledged before me on_. In ' 21 2006 PM by William J. (finers and Vicky L. Goem husband and wife NOTARIAL STAW OR SRAL(OR O'1'aER TITLE Oa RAMQ1 ,/ ON"MU ;TAWPUErt IC OR OTHER OFFICIAL SANDRA LYNN GLIEDEN Notary Public -Minnesota Check here if part or all of the land is Registered (Torrens) My Commiwlon Expires Jan 31, 2008 Tax Statements for the real property describeIs Instrument should be sent to (include name and add�sss of Grantee): Plowshares Development, Inc. TRa WMUalErrr WAS DRAFTED SY(NAaa AND ADDREas1: 1851 Lake Drive West, Suite 550 Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 1500 Wells Fargo Plaza 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55431 (952) 835-3800 (TPA) COPYING OF THIS FORM PROMINTED. ____— WARNING: UNAtITNORIZED City Clerk's Certification Pursuant to M.S. 272.162 The undersigned hereby certifies: (Check one of the following:) That City subdivision regulations do not apply to this instrument. That the subdivision of land affected by this instrument has been approved by the governing body of the City of Chanhassen. That municipal restrictions on the filing and recording of this instrument have been waived by a resolution of the governing body of the City of Chanhassen. That this instrument does not comply with municipal subdivision restrictions and the affected land and its assessed valuation should not be divided by the County Auditor. q Dated:2- , �O By Depu CChanhassen CityClerk Printed Name: [�r(hdj/� / w m A That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the following described line and its northerly and southerly extensions; Commencing at the Southeast comer of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 04 minutes 49 seconds West, bearing assumed, along the South line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 790.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 1 degree 57 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of 460.00 feet; thence North 18 degrees 32 minutes 33 seconds East, a distance of 330.00 feet; thence North 52 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 638.57 feet; thence North I degree 57 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of 150.59 feet to a point on the North line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter distant 156.07 feet Easterly of the Northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter as measured along said North line and there terminating. AND That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, described as follows, to -wit: The north 375.00 feet lying Westerly of the following described line, to -wit: Beginning at a point in the North line of said Southwest Quarter of Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) distant 849.31 feet West of the Northeast comer thereof; thence Southwesterly deflecting 64 degrees 42 minutes 04 seconds from West to South from said North line, a distance of 163.19 feet; thence Southerly deflecting to the left 32 degrees 35 minutes 37 seconds a distance of 125.62 feet; thence Southwesterly deflecting to the right 22 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds a distance of 302.23 feet; thence Southerly to the northwest corner of the East 290.75 feet of the West 484.2 feet of the South 539.7 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) as measured along the West and East lines of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4); thence South parallel with the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter to the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) and there terminating, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota. O►17 Outlot A, Shenandoah Ridge, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota. Abstract. Exhibit B Permitted Encumbrances: Right -of -Way Agreement recorded as Document No. 86516; Special Warranty Deed recorded as Document No. 110063; Partial Release of Right -of -Way recorded in Book 38 Satisfactions, Page 490; Agreement recorded as Document No. 73656. 2. Permanent Easement recorded as Document No. 169284 Development Contract filed as Document No. 166772 (Outlot A, Shenandoah Ridge) 1064948,1 Preliminary Plans for Stonef field Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared for. Plowshares Development, Inc. 1851 Lake Drive West Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Contact: Nathan Franzen Phone: 952-361-0832 Fax 952-361-0833 Prepared by: ". Westwood professional Sevion, Inc. .i eur.� .m.oarae. Project Number: 20051114.00 .,mon. o,nn n. Nen, Pr CITY FECEIVEDSSEN NOV 1 8 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT o No Vicinity Map rn an uvsar amn r e..we Pr a ca.o.n. u a . : 11 n a a.m.e Pa ar C—wt. M xx ui NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Preliminary Plans Smnefwd Prop"Dmoaan y�!rr.�M ernes •.r part.Mm•wxrr Osr. pt�rw+.lr� Ire xnrn. ry.p a.r v. n Wx�r �. m�nMo N/I �iNw �h•[�a�.�•��swnn �rM�!l rvuwi.�iu M��rt usrmm�n_.r xam� .rri.�tvmm��m1•�� o[sl.y NxW wem rim m�x uY run..r ala m•wrn._r avl. cr...�yvp m�ippt m• r.n M w x. sa•.r uar. w m xm._r o.r..r a.re.:a [..r.w ,r s..w..Jmmw ultimrts WM•wrt 4ceN car µ•.nv.r.ple.�n N�!xn�nu nRl�p ei' n L w.re 1�1��r_ Jr r.�� nriMmlm � Immix carry w� eiro M^ u�..�s _� �u 1. rn• ••mr6 • /Iss J vr[ rrr s� » n an[ n• mm� rs� I/• r• ��I/•J - �� n�• � •rJ arxwx p.I.�e 1/•.�r�•F rr.ra ppm• .r mvry ,� r ln.sr yr p e w rase n ln• .m• ar m• .axev xvrM 1/1 wunrmvr /•I ca um r.�m•ia •y ...�. A.r.rr. er,. _..r, r... nr r1._r _ ...r r.m..r m.m..r w ter. •...._. �.. �...r. LECBV Q usyD•,u C arvr urt � rtunn ry �.� m,r a,wiuo • m.ow. ,..r ., a.R O nrJ.rw....u. _...-. .ee.ummw ® umr. w. a mw ® s.ne wrmw uvw.m m a2� w A rue wJ —•.— JIam ertnMmrwr m ruse rem 8 nrurt la. __.- ms.r auMn - wn.mc net. O 112M1K Yw4J .a urt.eu —f Iowa umroo•u s uwv m uru. vrr.v. � _m rem i— reyw tl M' I]0' IOY ! r,win•v [rur 63 ae•uwvzr m aw.mx .�. rtmwe „rt ue � _ m me' n�..ra[w tir oa VY� NJ i ,r AKi SL; H7f.f..J 4D? =1770,V / \ H vi SEN YYalwooYSedm,Ylr. .r.,.r 1: ..�- Plowshares Development, Inc J \ l — L IWI� Unum x a v Stonefield H-i-dns con&tjm SCANNED I f �--------I O(/20TA 1 I / v6 / �\ 1 •I 2 n.rn / Vic.'¢• , .�,..,,.., I, CeV binsM Data IIS 7)ptdLal evw" awy el..a.s aM�M1 ,ai ma s a - xm. rwe smwr ..AKESJ^r.t: HIUS :vFs. sna,t ^.mnm z� I I wr I Plowshares Development, Inc Stonefield ._ w,..a. w...% ,aM SCANNEC nar.. o�.r ao �YfawJ eu.4n. IIS 7)ptdLal evw" awy el..a.s aM�M1 ,ai ma s a - xm. rwe smwr ..AKESJ^r.t: HIUS :vFs. sna,t ^.mnm z� I I wr I Plowshares Development, Inc Stonefield ._ w,..a. w...% ,aM SCANNEC ., MO�?*N' ��`��, f .,::t,/j,=/_?-}Ila// `��Y'�},s.s3<��•�`/Yb _b ��s.• '�♦i�r,'S„�_;*e �// J �\� .� � - � 9 I , , d;� Ups � • Y ate• 11�.�_�.�h.�'�_..z��,��./��.d.��V_�i ,al�:.•r�,'��..��.ua��i_G:�t .��.L.�,I�I�iM.�r, sacs ,`t.��3►\\ CFNiA�I lyt.MNC Y 11N11N.IS NMIiC �� eater vyMa 1rf • nPVO•D IOt NN.AM N•.nq mnmr an uo PPs arcs rr aw �® IiCIS W ¢na16�0EmX.Y VYLYY wu'n�`un•rq_mm ® � viocwm o�u w�w'�%y$�� o-YJ�� wb � (N'OOr ]Yt. GLKO1,a M1i1 S) ��nw Ym mwr swan rum nr®�.r w•s�u nu a no <7� Na SSW GFOI m b reap �� PI eu o W' N �V ivvw� Osrn uNE wn'r® mmFr my anm PnaP nun 0e�a.urMwa®clam inawwNYaws PMW4 WIR RrPR i.a iii. NOT FOR CONSR r . I—r-rHMEE _' _ Powaharea Development, Inc Stonefieldm�C� ICo n Plan SCANNED // /� GOPHER 9TA19 ONE CI11 i i i'"iarrM NI -wan CLOUTA I i----- 1 V -, ;;--------)f. f ♦`` `_-_ b __ -__J i ;; 11 ii �)/^\AS Md t°imq / / \`\ �♦ 11 11 W.r W"«i"L - i « \ I h �wI , � �♦\ ♦ � L______J it R � P\`♦ \ i__ i� ii ,i i / I�"---fir-'—rl I 1 , 1 111 1 \` ;1 %� l� i i 1 li i ii `♦ I I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1; 1 1 11 ; 1 I I ♦ J ';I 1j1 1 1\ _ 11111 � �1 11 ,% ,; , I Ji 1 I N.N I rzm� I w m w I I General Utllity Nota ,�, I I I I I� I I I � ,_i I • YMW w°aidrv�'0"M B n d s�.na...B. A m.�.�c,ax I I 1 t I � I • a M.a.Yll. W NmLE M xEad...dY,. ry .I..W. a,®E � ---1---J__—L--J I r'—i � L—_ �Na d,.Y aNlla: A N aY�11pIm:,X M �Y.naAYi DN,1.N. .wvrEraE W.on we Wod. rWa Aia..o axsRwnvl. 1�m _ J _ . M wld aExa dXL N WN.W6.a . YW a.D ri. d mIAL M F1i51W0 eMMIIR suu .W.. M an.s-WM1i a.NmFlla vw A o«a — J _ I EXxiu rz walla .xB Y.IOtl4 RR —a— dMFYR m —�— W.l[Fr Y-1— Yq �1— xL • flOYmrYE MYINC.Ni W[N OM.Y><xYRD. A Y/vmur --� Xm wllr —�F �C .v •sones edrz M uu• ra �iaYvnwuMnrnaAYlYmWnuumL slay —w— W1WNm —w— CaYaN IM m. a M Si.MMO u11D125 YECr1c Snq,s iaYrXWnIEP r' 1 NLLSS DMAIN>Q XOR➢. .1LL W INA ca51. IEONM1AN.IT A S11 • YYx .ND F IW[ WBiY1.BCw' uN .—I1 YMEF N,O 5[ y 0 yE ME OM1 MGx[[Fw0 .ssO�.na CL.'.A nx0 I M[ 'SIWDYD rnuna .a 711X.. Wxx. of NOT FOR CONSfRUCf10N N.RNED f.'Itlp AL PRO n LL d i.•�w+5i _ NT AOOcNQUU IIEOIWm ,D RY1M Yl .FDCD'J FSE15xWAnIx�NO By ME IWKA.¢Nry �� a o n I Imp 5aiM n I' �`� '� I "'� °"�"— - Plowshares Dev 1 n , Stonefield Prc lmi ury op e t Inc e am utwh Pial ...e er—ae—aom I's' I '� `�"r Plowshares Development, Inc Stonefield TM r .nom SCANNED PIPE LINE =w M DEV M10 I STREET A m w«1,veea ws�V I.ss` -_ I,,�.�s-�� — — I ` s I Plowshares Development, Inc. m.w v.m Nor FM ooNeraUMM Stonefield 1w w:71'77 ftaft P P�oaO -p AIME Wn[ W OATXl�ga nW aYoA, A. XO1L �uIRRX MtlO�M _ ��ARAT r�py M.ea P11 JN IN y y a rw a e. u �yariaamm .e 1W Westwood RW�i=WSmkex hc. IF�C� I W. I TYPICAL LOCAL STRM SBCnON (31' BACK TO BACK) X[r[X 1O KAN S FET FM V N furs EXACT Xw.LL% lounW 4, GOPHER STALE OIE GLL w-.a-amz FAR A— W o I Plowshares Development, Inc NOT FOR CONSTRUMON Stonefield �.. wnum ... ••n o• u Carver County GIS Mapping Application mows 11 ^'1, �7 � t1hFWowl ► PW 17 Nap Geared by C, a Qs 7A-g.d ROM ral UShbom, W KOIRU a 1W CBM Map Created on: CWq Roo& �10-31-2005 "k., Carver P."I' County Mnal PhM 7007 This map was created using Carver County's Geographic Information Systems (GIS), it is a compilation of information and data from various City, County, State, and Federal offices. This map is not a suryeyed or legally recorded map and is intended to be used as a reference. Carver County is not responsible for any inaccuracies contained herein. SCANNED This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not Intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and fedenel offices and other sources regarding the area shorn, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant Nat the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this maP are arm, free. and the City does not represent thal the GIS Data can be used for navigational, hacking Or my other Purpose requiring eructing measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. ti errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1101. The precedng disclaimer is pnpv tied pursuant to Mmlesota Stalules §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and this user of "a map ad cmiedges Nat the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly vmives all claim, and agrees to defend. indemnify, and b0dYik Wf� �y1rh.¢`�Cltykw an3yu9�0.4�.q�k�d'aims brought by User, its employees or agents, or Hind pareeajAbci(easq'o$td m4j sks yftid base of data provided. `c a 0. 3 a CITY OF CHANHASSNnIm/ 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us re;cis F6^E"'a NOV I calx VIVEK KAUL & SHERYL R EBERT 9875 DELPHINIUM LN CHASKA . MN 55318 -1176 Iilllllll111111111III IifIIII IIII III IIIIII III IIIIIifIIIIIfill 11 CITY OF CHANHASSEN NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING POSTPONEMENT Dear Property Owner: On November 3, 2005, the City of Chanhassen mailed a public hearing notice to you regarding the following proposal: • Request for a Site Plan Amendment for the expansion and redesign of a club house — HALLA GREENS The public hearing has been POSTPONED and WILL NOT be held at the November 15, 2005 Planning Commission meeting as originally scheduled. The public hearing has also been amended to read "Request for a Site Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Variances for the construction of a golf course". The item has been tentatively rescheduled for December b, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. If you have questions regarding this proposal, contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff at 952-227-1134 or by email: saliaff(a)ci.chanhassen.mn.us QQD I� iiii ii'i 1II{'11�I I11 tI iI (p X141 s le'n�Olrro esus 4a!W�saykdWTP m'sl�Be to sSa.Col T r!-Li3sPgw'Sna9 4u!ep Ile We Am wal /4.0 a41 s Pmq Pp4 Pue'AI!u, U"P.pp .1.6e Pue'sulep IT mryem 1 RISSaIQRd pm 'sq() L p Am .1 aW!l a9 pu IIeW f4.to aW Ie41 seBpapM"M dau ewl p Jew 841 l fl 69%- LlE6 NW ' N3SStlHNtlH'J pue (oDoZ) 1Z'p9n5'co -99v4 wmuis of iuumrt pepmud sI 1auieps➢ Bupamd 941 '[alt-LR-ZSB L'ieWop eseaM Purrol ere sapuedapsiP io voua N'sawleal oi4deiBoaB p uoppltlep e4I HO OONIWVIj 0999 u! WSpd+d w uoq-'ro1!p to e.n .,P io wewwnwau 15,U Ka euwnba esodUA 1a4p A. m Bur,; 4 13(]HVH N NOHVHS B M NHOf '10MMBNEe wl Pasn eq uea wea Ste e4I Ie4I lu sa , wu seop N!a e4I pm 'ewl wm wu dew S, I emd ud of Paso elea (SIE)) WeTAS uomuu pl olWwBue'J e4119W wetter. lou seop /413 e41 �� 'App sas d e...Paso a, Paq M s! Pue 'wo45 ¢cm eW Bu9mBet saw,ps ie4w P. saps q. pa pm ems'Aw1wa'Apo srouen u, pepwol eMp pug uoTxwQlw,'spup j p MplAuw a $! dau Z s, y auo se pasn eq of pepualul wu si pm Aamm a wu dew pep om AIIe6eI a Ie4 eu S, dew sPLL N3SSVHI\IVHO i0 A110 soot f o AON M F,�� G1 ' \ sn-m-uassequep-p-mm e L 1E59 elosouuiyll 'Uassequugo LK xo8'0'd pienaino8 19A7eW DOLL 1111 K Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: I Tuesday, November 15, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: 1 City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Rezoning and Subdivision with Variances on 'rot.asal: prcperty located at 1601 Lym4n Bo vard — STONEFIELD Plannin ,File: 05-37 Applicant: Plowshares Development, LLC Property 1601 Lyman Boulevard Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff at 952-227-1134 Questions & or e-mail saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to Comments: submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online at _h_ttp://206.10.76.6/weblink7 the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure; • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Placaing Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercialrndustdal. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersontrepresentative Is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff Is also available to review the project with any Interested person(a). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be Included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be Included In the report, please contact the Plannina Staff person named on the notification. CITY OF CHANHASSEN STAFF REPORT ,.. PC DATE: December 6, 2005 F6 CC DATE: January 12, 2005 REVIEW DEADLINE: February 13, 2006 CASE #: 05-37 BY: Al-Jaff PROPOSAL: Request for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A-2, to Single Family Residential, RSF; Subdivision review for 30 Lots, 1 Outlot and public right-of-way with Variances — STONEFIELD LOCATION: 1601 Lyman Boulevard APPLICANT: Plowshares Development, Inc. William and Vicky Goers 1851 Lake Drive West, Suite 550 1601 Lyman Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Contact: Nathan Franzen Contact: William Goers 952-361-0832 952-448-6593 Nathan.fi-anzen(a plowsharesdevelonment.com PRESENT ZONING: A-2, Agricultural Estate District 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential -Low Density (Net Density 1.2 - 4.0 units per acre) ACREAGE: 17.63 Acres DENSITY: Gross 1.7 Units/Ac Net 2.08 Units/Ac SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Rezoning of 17.63 acres of property zoned A-2, Rural Residential, to RSF, Residential Single Family and Preliminary Plat to Subdivide 17.63 Acres into 30 single-family lots and 1 outlot, Stonefield. Staff is recommending approval with conditions. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving a rezoning because the City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A rezoning must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan Location Map STONEFIELD Rezoning & Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-37 1601 Lyman Boulevard City of Chanhassen SCANNED �wn4P RM Lake Onve / n0. a N.r 0 j a °o• a W. a 4 MI Y�eM I r,a awn SUBJECT i iq� SITE i a-. 0 a o., — --Lyman SNE (C.R. 18) L man Blvd (C.R. 1 SCANNED Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 2 PROPOSAUSUMMARY The applicant is proposing to subdivide 17.63 acres into 30 single-family lots and 1 outlot. The property is zoned A-2, Agricultural Estate District, and the proposal calls for rezoning it to RSF, Residential Single Family. The site is located north of Lyman Boulevard and is bisected by Osprey Lane. Access to the site is proposed via a cul-de-sac off of Osprey Lane. All lots are proposed to be served via the cul- de-sac with the exception of two lots which will be served via Osprey Lane. The average lot size is 20,920 square feet with a resulting gross density of 1.7 units per acre and a net density of 2.08 units per acre. All of the proposed lots meet the minimum area, width, and depth IIIIZ4� requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff has been i, working with the applicant for z several months. The plans have gone through revisions to improve the overall development (height of retaining walls, depth of lots, size of usable back yards, etc.). Staff was invited by the developer to visit a development in the City of Eden Prairie that had a similar topography to the subject site. One of the main concerns staff had was the livability of the backyards of these lots. As can be seen on the photo to the right, the developer provided a flat area (approximately 10 feet wide) followed by a retaining wall and a steep grade. The development in Chanhassen will have a minimum of 20 feet of flat back yard area which will allow for a larger usable area. Staff also noticed that all the homes had a three car garage. This was a concern that staff shared with the applicant. The applicant submitted some floor plans for potential houses on the lots in this subdivision that will fit on the lots with no variances. Stonefreld Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 3 Williams Pipeline runs through this development. This is a high pressure pipe line. It is located within a 50 -foot wide easement; however, the pipe is not centered within the easement. The buildable area on Lot 3, Block 4 is located 35 feet from the pipeline, while Lot 4, Block 4 is located 15 feet from the pipeline. Staff requested the applicant increase the side yard setback on Lot 4, Block 4, and provide a larger separation between the pipeline and any future home. The applicant increased the easement along the side property line to allow for a 25 -foot setback from the actual pipeline. Staff contacted the pipeline company regarding this issue and was informed that the additional setback was encouraged. Also, staff advised the applicant to hold a neighborhood meeting to inform any interested neighbors of the proposed development. The applicant held the meeting on November 8, 2005. There is one outlot proposed on the site. This outlot will contain the pipe line, storm pond and a trail. The site consists of two parcels owned by the same person. The developer is replatting the most northerly parcel and a portion of the southerly parcel. These two parcels are being assembled into one tract of land, and then subdivided. A wetland occupies the easterly portion of the site. The site has some mature trees. The proposed development is well designed and consistent with ordinance requirements. Staff is recommending approval with conditions outlined in the staff report. REZONING The applicant is proposing to rezone the property from A-2, Agricultural Estate District, to RSF, Residential Single Family. The areas to the north and east are zoned Planned Unit Development - Residential. The area to the south and west is zoned Agricultural Estate District. All the surrounding property is guided Residential Low Density. The 2020 Land Use Plan shows this area designated for development as Low Density Residential, 1.2 - 4.0 units per acre. Appropriate zoning for this land use is RSF, R4 or PUD -R. The applicant's proposal has a gross density of 1.7 units per acre and 2.08 units per acre net after the streets and wetlands are taken out. This area is in the MUSA. Staff is recommending that this area be rezoned to RSF and finds that the rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. PRELIMINARY PLAT The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 17.63 -acre site into 30 single-family lots. The density of the proposed subdivision is 1.7 units per acre gross and 2.08 units per acre net after removing the roads and wetlands. All the lots exceed the minimum 15,000 square feet of area, with an average lot size of 20,920 square feet. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 4 All of the proposed lots meet the minimum width and depth requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. There is one outlot proposed on the site. This outlot will contain a sidewalk, storm pond and an existing pipe line. Lots 5 through 10, Block 3, abut a wetland. The ordinance requires all structures to maintain a 40 - foot setback from the outside edge of a wetland buffer strip. The ordinance also requires a buffer zone in addition to the wetland setback. A wetland buffer 16.5 feet in width must be maintained around the wetland. Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. WETLANDS Six ag/urban wetlands exist on-site. Westwood Professional Services, Inc. delineated the wetlands in August 2005. Wetland A is a 1,182 square foot Type 1 wetland located along the northeast side of the property. The wetland is dominated by reed canary grass. Because this wetland is incidental, all impacts are exempt. Wetland B is a 6,530 square foot Type 3 wetland located in the north central portion of the property. The wetland is dominated by reed canary grass, smartweed, box elder and sandbar willow. This basin was constructed with the Shenandoah Ridge subdivision to the west as a temporary storm water pond. Because this wetland is incidental, all impacts are exempt. Wetland C is a 40,915 square foot Type 6 wetland located in the central portion of the property. The wetland is dominated by spotted touch-me-not and sandbar willow. Because this wetland is incidental, all impacts are exempt. Wetland D is a 1,098 square foot wetland located in the southeast corner of the property. The wetland is a riverine basin with limited vegetation. The applicant is proposing no impact to this basin. Wetland E is a 9,995 square foot Type 2 wetland located along the eastern border of the property. The wetland is dominated by reed canary grass and river bulrush. Because this wetland is incidental, all impacts are exempt. Wetland F is a 901 square foot Type 1 wetland located in the northeast portion of the property. The wetland is dominated by reed canary grass and black willow. Because this wetland is incidental, all impacts are exempt. On September 23, 2005, City staff conducted an on-site review of the wetland delineation with the delineator. The wetland boundary shown on the plans is consistent with staff findings and staff agrees with the delineator's suggestion that Wetlands A, B, C, E and F are incidental and therefore exempt. On October 12, 2005, staff issued an incidental wetland exemption for Wetlands A, B, C, E and F. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 5 A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) must be maintained around Wetland D. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures must maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL The site area is about 17.60 acres and has tree cover over approximately 4.69 acres (27%) of the parcel with a variety of grade changes. The site elevations range from a high of 970± to a low of 912±. These severe elevation differences make it challenging to both develop and minimize grading on this site. The plans propose to grade about 80% of the site for 30 new house pads, a proposed street and enlarging an existing stormwater pond. The proposed grading will prepare the site for full basement and walk -out type house pads. Retaining walls are proposed throughout the site due to the severe elevation differences and to create the house pads. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. Retaining walls within drainage and utility easements must be minimized; however, staff understands that this may not be feasible; therefore, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. Storm Water Management There is an existing regional pond in the northeast portion of this site. The regional pond (BC - P4.10) presently receives storm water from the Lake Susan Hills development. Recent calculations by the City have indicated that the subwatershed for the pond is larger than anticipated. The temporary pond in the northern portion of the site was constructed with the Shenandoah Ridge development to the west. This pond will be eliminated in order to provide access to the Stonefreld site from the north. The storm water from this subwatershed must be accommodated in the regional pond. In addition, the streets and many of the backyards in the proposed development drain to this regional pond. The pond must be enlarged, or additional ponding must be constructed, to accommodate the pond's existing subwatershed, the storm water from the temporary pond and the proposed development. Outlot A contains a high-pressure pipeline that will limit the expansion of the existing pond and may force the construction of an additional pond downstream. The existing site drainage is encompassed within almost one drainage area. Under existing conditions, the site drains from the north and west sides to the east to an existing wetland along the southeast side of the property line. Under developed conditions, the applicant is proposing to capture all of the street drainage, all of the front yard drainage, and some rear yard drainage from the interior lots. This stormwater will be conveyed via storm sewer to an existing pond in the northeast comer of the site for treatment. The existing stormwater pond was designed to treat much of the site drainage areas adjacent to the parcel from the north and northeast sides. Since the applicant is proposing to enlarge the existing stormwater pond to accommodate the additional drainage generated from the proposed site, the enlargement must be designed to City standards and coordinated and approved by the City's Water Resources Coordinator. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 6 Drainage calculations for the site have been submitted and some changes must be made. The applicant is required to meet the existing site peak runoff rates for 10 -year and 100 -year, 24-hour storm events. Storm sewer sizing calculations with drainage map must be submitted at the time of final plat application. The storm sewer must be sized for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. In order to ensure that all necessary subwatersheds are accommodated by the regional pond expansion and/or downstream ponding, the City has hired a consultant to design the storm water retention and treatment facilities in this area. The applicant must work with the City's consultant to accommodate regional and site-specific storm water needs. Additional land in the rear yards of proposed Lots 1-8, Block 3 may be required for storm water infrastructure. There is existing draintile that flows north to south along the eastern property line. The approximate location and extent of tile should be shown on the plans. The applicant should provide details as to whether the file line will be removed, abandoned in place or remain. If the file is to remain, the flow from the tile should be accommodated in the design of the storm water management plan. Wetland D is the beginning of a ravine -type system that flows south-southwest through the Goers property (1601 Lyman Boulevard). The ravine has very steep slopes and is highly unstable. The applicant must provide rate control and storm water treatment to reduce off-site impacts. To provide a low -gradient means for controlling rate and volume, the applicant should consider cooperating with the City to construct a wetland in the rear portions of any number of Lots 1-8, Block 3. In the event that the applicant is interested in pursuing wetland construction for banking purposes, this planning should be integrated with the City's consultant's storm water infrastructure planning. Erosion and Sediment Control Due to steep grades, especially in the southern portion of the site, and historic problems with erosion on this property and properties downstream, erosion and sediment control are of great importance on this site. The proposed retaining walls are of concern to staff due to their height and the potential for downslope erosion and drainage issues. In order to reduce the height of the walls and blend the site into adjacent development, staff recommends platting Lots 8-12, Block 3 and Lots 11-12, Block 4 as one outlot to be subdivided in the future when the parcel to the west develops. At a minimum, Lots 8-12, Block 3 should be custom graded to minimize exposed soils and maximize tree preservation. The existing outlet structure of Pond A is failing. The structure should be removed and replaced in accordance with the City's standard detail. The use of the shredded wood should be considered. The shredded wood could be used as immediate temporary cover after the trees are removed and prior to grading. They could be used as a temporary site exit pad if installed at 100 feet long and minimum of 8 inches thick. The portion of the silt fence that runs from the pipeline easement through Lot 7, Block 3 should be moved upslope to the west by 30 to 60 feet to more clearly define the grading limits. The area Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 7 of property between the silt fence and the gully and property line should be seeded and mulched to control weeds and get a desirable cover crop in areas that were recently farmed. A temporary basin is necessary in the vicinity of Lots 6 and 7, Block 3. The temporary sediment basin must be installed prior to disturbing upslope area. A temporary perforated riser and stable emergency overflow (EOF) for the basin is needed; details must be included in the plan. The basin should be properly sized for the watershed area, according to NPDES requirements (i.e. The basins must provide storage below the outlet pipe for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2 year, 24 hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shall the basin provide less than 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe from each acre drained to the basin). There are small swales visible in the wooded area that illustrated the erosive concerns of this area especially when it is cleared. If possible, a diversion should be constructed to get the water to the temporary basin in Lot 7, Block 3. A small sediment trap and rock weeper should be considered as an alternativeladditional perimeter control in the wooded area should the type 2 silt fence not be enough to protect the stream/waterway. Chanhassen type 2 silt fence is needed for the perimeter of the site up to Lot 10, Block 3. From there, type 1 would be acceptable. Silt fence should be shown on the plans around Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. Curbside inlet controls are needed; Wimco type or ESS type (or approved similar protection) inlet controls must be used. Curbside inlet protection is needed for existing inlets adjacent to the site exit on Osprey Lane. Adjustment of the proposed rear yard catch basin protection is needed. Wimco type, ESS type or equal must be used. The proposed silt fence is not adequate without additional rock around Chanhassen type 1 silt fence. The plans should be revised to show energy dissipation for the flared end section on Lot 7, Block 3. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of SloW Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 8 Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. The applicant should be aware that any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. Surface Water Management Fees Water Quality Fees Because of the impervious surface associated with this development, the water quality fees for this proposed development are based on single-family residential development rates of $1,028/acre. Based on the proposed developed area of approximately 17.21 acres, the water quality fees associated with this project are $18,811. Water Quantity Fees The SWMP has established a connection charge for the different land uses based on an average citywide rate for the installation of water quantity systems. This cost includes land acquisition, proposed SWMP culverts, open channels, and storm water ponding areas for runoff storage. Single- family residential developments have a connection charge of $2,545 per developable acre. This results in a water quantity fee of approximately $46,553 for the proposed development. SWMP Credits This project proposes the expansion of one NURP pond. The applicant will be credited for 50% of the water quality connection charge where NURP basins are provided to treat runoff from the site. This will be determined upon review of the ponding and storm sewer calculations. Credits may also be applied to the applicant's SWMP fees for the provision of outlet structures. The applicant will not be assessed for areas that are dedicated outlots. No credit will be given for temporary pond areas. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $65,364. Easements Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) should be provided over all existing wetlands, storm water infrastructure and storm water ponds. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood level. UTILITIES Municipal water service is available to the site from Osprey Lane and sewer is available at the Bluebill Trail and Osprey Lane intersection. The water and sewer mains will be extended south from Osprey Lane to serve the site and stubbed at the southwest corner of the parcel for future extension to the west. Due to the topography of the site and the elevation of the existing sanitary sewer, the site cannot be served by a gravity sanitary sewer system; therefore, a lift station is proposed between Lot 4, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 3. The lift station is not identified on the Trunk Sanitary Sewer System map, or in the capital improvement plan; therefore, the developer Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 9 is responsible for 100% of the cost and installation of the lift station and forcemain. The lift station and forcemain must meet the City's minimum requirements. The developer is responsible for any additional work required to install the lift station and forcemain including, but not limited to, dewatering costs, grading, subgrade correction and signal tests. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,955.00 per unit for watermain, and the SAC fee is $1,525.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Upon completion and final acceptance of the utility improvements, the City will own and maintain these utilities. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. The developer must. obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health and Carver County. Once the executed development contract, securities, fees and permits have been submitted, a preconstruction meeting must be held before grading and/or utility construction can begin. STREETS The plans show Osprey Lane within two right-of-way widths, 50 -feet and 60 -feet. The plans propose one full access to the site off of Osprey Lane from the north. The proposed public street complies with the minimum required right-of-way and pavement width. A temporary 90 -foot diameter cul-de-sac turnaround for emergency vehicles is proposed at the southwest end of the proposed street and a "dead-end road" sign will be required. PARK DEDICATION PARKS The property is situated directly west of and shares a common border with Power Hill park. This neighborhood park was developed in approximately 1990 and features a large sliding hill, basketball court, playground, small park shelter and limited off-street parking. A significant elevation change exists between the top of Power Hill Park and the location proposed for the new homes in Stonefield. This will be a deterrent for some residents of the new Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 10 subdivision as they attempt to visit the park. No additional parkland acquisition or dedication is recommended as a condition of this subdivision request. TRAILS Many neighborhoods adjoining Power Hill Park gain access to the park from neighborhood trail connectors. The applicant has included such a connector in their submittal. The proposed location for the trail connector, within Outlot A, is acceptable to staff. TREE PRESERVATION/LANDSCAPING Tree canopy calculations have been submitted for the Stonefield development. They are as follows: Total upland area (excluding wetlands) 17.60 ac. Baseline canopy coverage 27% or 4.69 ac. Minimum canopy coverage allowed 30% or 5.28 ac. Proposed tree preservation 7% or 1.25 ac. The applicant does not meet minimum canopy coverage allowed; therefore, the difference between the baseline and proposed tree preservation is multiplied by 1.2 to calculate the required replacement plantings. Difference in canopy coverage (4.69-1z5) 149,846 SF or 3.44 ac. Multiplier 1.2 Total replacement 179,815 SF Total number of trees to be planted 165 trees The applicant also needs to make up the difference between the existing canopy coverage (4.69 ac) and the required canopy coverage (5.28 ac). Difference in canopy coverage 25,700 SF or .59 ac Number of trees to be planted 24 Total number of trees required 189 The applicant has proposed a total of 189 trees - 77 overstory trees, 32 ornamentals and 80 evergreens in their landscape plan. No bufferyards are required. The land uses of neighboring properties are similar. The applicant exceeds the recommended 105' of tree removal for wooded lots. Even with the use of extensive retaining walls, the amount of tree removal in the wooded area of the property exceeds minimum ordinance requirements. However, it is less than what could potentially be removed without the use of retaining walls. Staff recommends that alternatives to the proposed plan be thoroughly researched by the applicant. Possible solutions would include larger lots on Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 11 the southern end, different home styles that are more sensitive to the topography and custom graded lots. COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE - RSF DISTRICT Setbacks: front, side, Wetland fG) Frontage (ft) Def �h rear, wetland buffer Buffer (s9 setback (ft) Code 15,000 90 125 30, 10, 30, 40 16.5 Block 1 Lot 1 16,324 91.44 220.28 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 2 15,264 90.00 178.81 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Block 2 Lot 1 (Corner 15,200 92.37, 127.07 136.08 30/30, 10/10, N/A, N/A N/A Lot) Lot 2 15,123 99.01 153.03 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 3 17,128 91.36 192.17 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 4 21,167 75.61 @ Front Lot Line 177.98 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 93.83 @ Setback Line Block 3 Lot 1 35,876 88.26 @ Front Lot Line 307.47 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 95.26 @ Setback Line Lot 2 25,931 90.00 290.72 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 3 23,568 98.15 293.11 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 4 23,995 90.79 296.75 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 5 26,253 90.00 291.70 30, 10, 30, 40 16.5 Lot 6 25,506 90.00 283.40 30, 10, N/A, 40 16.5 Lot 7 25,700 89.01 @ Front Lot Line 275.10 30, 10, N/A, 40 16.5 90 @ Setback Line Lot 8 25,348 78.51 @ Front Lot Line 223.39 30, 10, N/A, 40 16.5 90 @ Setback Line Lot 9 21,983 78.51 @ Front Lot Line 211.41 30, 10, 30, 40 16.5 90 @ Setback Line Lot 10 34,207 78.51 @ Front Lot Line 242.00 30, 10, 30, 40 16.5 90 @ Setback Line Lot 11 23,343 78.51 @ Front Lot Line 213.95 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 90 @ Setback Line Lot 12 17,596 86.61 @ Front Lot Line 189.81 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 94.29 @ Setback Line Block 4 Lot 1 (Corner 17,729 96.2, 125.05 134.90 30/30, 10/10, N/A, N/A N/A Lot) Lot 2 15,131 1 93.01 185.58 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 3 19,079 1 137.68 217.40 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 12 @ Meets 90 foot width at the building setback line. na — Not Applicable SUBDIVISION - FINDINGS The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; Finding: The subdivision meets all the requirements of the RSF, Residential Single Family District. 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the subdivision ordinance. 3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; Setbacks: front, side, Wetland Area Frontage (ft) Depth rear, wetland buffer Buffer (s q' ) (ft) setback (ft) Code 15,000 90 125 30, 10, 30, 40 16.5 Lot 4 23,769 130.07 223.37 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 5 18,727 90.00 208.08 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 6 18,180 86.25 @ Front Lot Line 187.04 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 90.12 @ Setback Line Lot 7 16,924 85.9 @ Front Lot Line 174.45 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 90.13 @ Setback Line Lot 8 16,450 87.93 @ Front Lot Line 175.54 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 90.10 @ Setback Line Lot 9 16,498 90.00 183.31 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 10 17,245 90.00 191.61 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 11 17,754 98.14 198.57 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 12 20,608 223.85 198.57 30, 10/10, N/A, N/A N/A Outlot A 42,831 Right -of- 97,138 way TOTAL 627,606 @ Meets 90 foot width at the building setback line. na — Not Applicable SUBDIVISION - FINDINGS The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; Finding: The subdivision meets all the requirements of the RSF, Residential Single Family District. 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the subdivision ordinance. 3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 13 Finding: The proposed subdivision is served by adequate urban infrastructure. 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Finding: The proposed subdivision will cause some environmental damage. However, the proposed subdivision contains adequate open areas to accommodate house pads. 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. The one area of concern to staff is the lots abutting the gas pipeline. The applicant is providing an additional 10 foot side yard setback on Lot 4, Block 4 (the lot with the closest house pad to the pipeline) to increase the setback from the actual pipeline. Staff is recommending the applicant get a permit from Williams Pipeline prior to construction. 7. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: a. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. b. Lack of adequate roads. C. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. d. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision will have access to public utilities and streets. See. 18-22. Variances. The City Council may grant a variance from the regulations contained in this chapter as part of the plat approval process following a finding that all of the following conditions exist: 1. The hardship is not a mere inconvenience 2. The hardship is caused by the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions of the land; 3. The condition or conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally applicable to other property; 4. The granting of a variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of this chapter, the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. Finding: The applicant is requesting a right-of-way variance. The ordinance requires a 60 -foot right-of-way width. The westerly portion of Osprey Lane is 60 feet while the easterly portion is 50 feet. This variance will allow the proposed road to meet existing right-of-way conditions. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 14 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the following motions: REZONING "The Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case #05-37 for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A-2, to Single Family Residential, for the Stonefield Subdivision, as shown on plan stamped `Received November 18, 2005'." PRELIMINARY PLAT "The Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat for Subdivision Case #05- 37 for Stonefield for 30 lots and 1 outlot with a right-of-way width variance, as shown on the plans stamped `Received November 18, 2005', subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will be required to meet the existing site runoff rates for 10 -year and 100 -year, 24-hour storm events. The proposed enlargement of the existing stormwater pond must be designed to meet the City's minimum standards and coordinated and approved by the City Water Resources Coordinator. 2. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations and a full-size drainage map must be submitted with the final plat for staff review and approval. 3. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood level. 4. Staff recommends that Type II silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, be used adjacent to the existing wetland, existing creek area, and around the proposed pond. In addition, tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. Erosion control blankets are recommended for all of the steep 3:1 slopes with an elevation change of eight feet or more. 5. All plans must be signed by a registered Civil Engineer in the State of Minnesota. 6. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health, Carver County and the Williams Pipe Line Company. The developer must obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 15 8. On the utility plan: a. Show all the proposed storm sewer pipe type, size and class. b. Show the sanitary sewer pipe slope and class. c. Show watermain pipe class (C900). d. Add a storm sewer schedule. e. Show the existing storm sewer between Lots 1 & 2, Block 1 within the center of the 20 - foot utility easement. L Show the stormwater manholes rim and invert elevations. g. Add a note to remove the temporary pond outlet control structure. h. The last street -accessible storm manhole discharging to the stormwater pond must be manhole with sump. i. Add a note: any connection to an existing structure must be core drilled. j. Extend the storm sewer farther to the south along the proposed street. k. Remove Lots 7 and 8 backyard storm sewer and add a storm sewer along the property line between Lots 4 and 5 and between Lots 8 and 9 block 4. 9. On the grading plan: a. Show Type H silt fence adjacent to wetland, pond, creeks, etc. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Use class 5 storm sewer in the roadway; revise the note under general grading and drainage notes accordingly. d. Extend the Swale between Lots 1 and 2, Block 4 farther to the east. 10. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. In addition, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. 11. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,955.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,525.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. 12. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 13. Any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. 14. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. 15. The developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and construction of the lift station and forcemain and any associated costs. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 16 16. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 17. Add a "dead-end road" sign at the cul-de-sac. 18. On the plat, show all existing and proposed street names. 19. Add City Detail Plate Nos. 1001, 1002, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1009, 2001, 2101, 2109, 2110, 2201, 2204, 3101, 3102, 3104, 3106, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5200, 5203, 5204, 5206, 5214, 5215, 5216, 5217, 5221, 5232, 5234, 5240, 5241, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A and 5313. 20. Show the street lights and a stop sign on the plans. 21. Submit public utility plans and profile for staff review. 22. City Forester's Conditions: a. A minimum of two overstory trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. b. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. c. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. d. Tree preservation on site shall be according to tree preservation plans dated 10/14/05. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 23. In the absence of parkland dedication, it is recommended that Stonefield pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final platting. At today's rate, these fees would total $120,000 (30 lots x $4,000). Additionally, the applicant is required to construct the neighborhood asphalt trail connector to the property line as depicted on their preliminary plan submittals. 24. Water Resource Coordinator's Conditions: a. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetland D. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. b. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 17 c. The applicant shall work with the City's consultant to accommodate regional and site- specific storm water needs. d. The approximate location and extent of drain tile shall be shown on the plans. The applicant shall provide details as to whether the tile line will be removed, abandoned in place or remain. If the tile is to remain, the flow from the tile shall be accommodated in the design of the storm water management plan. e. The applicant shall provide rate control and storm water treatment to reduce off-site impacts. To provide a low -gradient means for controlling rate and volume, the applicant shall consider cooperating with the City to construct a wetland in the rear portions of any number of Lots 1-8, Block 3. In the event that the applicant is interested in pursuing wetland construction for banking purposes, this planning shall be integrated with the City's consultant's storm water infrastructure planning. f. Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) shall be provided over all existing wetlands, storm water infrastructure and storm water ponds. g. Lots 8-12, Block 3 shall be custom graded to minimize exposed soils and maximize tree preservation. h. The existing outlet structure of Pond A shall be removed and replaced in accordance with the City's standard detail. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) shall be provided for the pond. i. The portion of the silt fence that runs from the pipeline easement through Lot 7, Block 3 shall be moved upslope to the west by 30 to 60 feet to more clearly define the grading limits. The area of property between the silt fence and the gully and property line shall be seeded and mulched to control weeds and get a desirable cover crop in areas that were recently farmed. j. A temporary basin shall be constructed in the vicinity of Lots 6 and 7, Block 3. The temporary sediment basin shall be installed prior to disturbing upslope area. A temporary perforated riser and stable emergency overflow (EOF) for the basin shall be installed; details shall be included in the plan. The basin shall be properly sized for the watershed area, according to NPDES requirements (i.e. The basins must provide storage below the outlet pipe for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2 -year, 24-hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shall the basin provide less than 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe from each acre drained to the basin). k. Chanhassen Type 2 silt fence shall be provided for the perimeter of the site up to Lot 10, Block 3. From there, Type 1 may be used. Silt fence shall be shown on the plans around Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 18 Curbside inlet controls are needed; Wimco type or ESS type (or approved similar protection) inlet controls shall be used. Curbside inlet protection shall be provided for existing inlets adjacent to the site exit on Osprey Lane. City standard inlet protection details 5302 and 5302A shall be included in the plans. The proposed rear yard catch basin protection shall be revised; Wimco type, ESS type or equal must be used. The proposed silt fence shall be installed with additional rock around Chanhassen type 1 silt fence. m. The plans shall be revised to show energy dissipation for the flared end section on Lot 7, Block 3. n. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. o. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. p. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $65,364. 25. Fire Marshall Conditions: a. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be either removed from site or chipped. b. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. c. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 19 d. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. e. Fire hydrant spacing is acceptable. L Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. g. A cul-de-sac shall be designed into the end of the new proposed roads by lot 12. Dimensions should be 90 -foot in diameter. Submit details to Chanhassen City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 26. Building Official Conditions: a. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. b. Demolition permits must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site. c. The developer must submit a list of proposed street names for review and approval prior to final plat of the property. d. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. e. Separate sewer and water services must be provided each lot. E Existing wells and on-site sewage treatment systems on the site must be abandoned in accordance with State Law and City Code. 27. The retaining walls shall be maintained by a Homeowners Association." ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Affidavit of Mailing and Public Hearing Notice. 4. Potential footprints for houses to be built within the Stonefield Subdivision. 5. Letter from the developer extending the deadline to complete this application to 120 days. 6. Preliminary plat dated "Received November 18, 2005". g:tplan\2005 planning cases\05-37 stonefield (goers propeny)\staff reporuloc City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 OF (952) 227-1100 ER To: Nathan Franzen Plowshares Development, Inc. 1851 Lake Drive West Chanhassen, MN 55317 Ship To: Invoice SALESPERSON DATE TERMS KTM 11/3/05 upon receipt NOTE: This invoice is in accordance with the Development Review Application submitted to the City by the Addressee shown above (copy attached). Make all checks payable to: City of Chanhassen Please write the following code on your check: Planning Case #05-37 - Stonefield. If you have any questions concerning this invoice, call: (952)-227-1107. THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS! {CANNED DONNA R RICHARDSON CHRISTOPHER T ACKERMAN & DONNA J BURT 1551 HERON DR JERRY M COLBY 1550 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8531 1591 HERON DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8569 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8531 ROBERT G & JAN E CHATMAS JAMES A & DIANE W BOCK WILLIAM T & SHARON E ANDERSON 1552 BLUEBILL TRL 1581 HERON DR 1561 HERON DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8569 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317.8531 CHANHASSEN, MN 56317-8531 PAUL L & TONI M COLEMAN JAY A & BETH A BENSON PHU V TRINH & 1571 HERON DR 8532 OSPREY LN LAN M LUONG CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8531 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8562 8548 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 -9371 HOLLY CAIS LINDSAY & THOMAS A & MARY C PEREMSKY TERRY D & LINDA C DAHL B560HOLLY ALISA WARTNICK 8551 OSPREY LN 8552 OSPREY LN CHAHASCT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8564 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8563 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9371 FELICIMO P NAVALES JR TIMOTHY J BLANCHARD & GREGORY J VALENTY & 8572 ALISA CT DEBORAH J BLANCHARD MARCELINE W VALENTY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9371 1559 BLUEBILL TRL 8562 OSPREY LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8571 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8563 CRAIG M MERTZ BRYAN M O'KEEFFE & MICHAEL NOTHOM & PO BOX 216 KIM A CHRISTENSEN LORI BUDIN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -0216 8565 ALISA CT 1561 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9371 CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-8571 ROBERT JAMES HARRIMAN SETH T NELSON & PATRICK J & KATHERINE THIELEN 8551 ALISA CT AMY L JOHNSON 8572 OSPREY LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9371 8584 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8563 CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 -9371 JOSEPH HALSTEAD 8 GARY W 8 PATRICIA L HARMON TODD R FOSSOM & LIZA RATHMANNER ANNETTE M SNYDER-FOSSUM 8559 ALISA CT 8571 OSPREY LN 1563 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9371 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8564 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8571 KEVIN J & JENNIFER J GREER ANDREW J & TAMMY A HAKANSON JON A EVENSON 8582 OSPREY LN 8581 OSPREY LN 8600 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8563 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8564 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9373 STEVEN C & MARY BETH HARTWIG DANIEL J & TONI M GAGNON RAY F & TERESA R VANSTRAATEN 1565 BLUEBILL TRL 1564 BLUEBILL TRL 8601 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8571 CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-8570 CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-9373 JEFFREY S & BETH M FLISS BRIAN A & TEGWIN A ROME JAMES W TYLER & 8710 OSPREY LN 1577 BLUEBILL TRL JOANN BRADY TYLER CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8568 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8571 1573 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8571 JUAN BERENGUER SR KATHLEEN M KRUPiCICKA WILLIAM J & ANN M DALHOFF MICHAEL R & NANCY C BAXTER CT 1569 BLUEBILL TRL 1566 BLUEBILL TRL CHA CHANHASSEN, , MN 55317 -9373 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8571 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8570 JEFFREY M ASHENBRENNER & SANDRA J KOPF JASON J KOENIG & EMILY ASHENBRENNER 1578 BLUEBILL TRL LAURIE ANN MADISON 8617 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8570 8632 ALISA CT CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9373 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9373 SHAWN & SUSAN MALEK-ZADEGAN CHRISTOPHER MATT AMACK & JULIE ANN GRUBER & 1568 BLUEBILL TRL JULIE A INGERSOLL DAVID M LISS CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8570 8633 ALISA CT 1576 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9373 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8570 MARK L & KARLYN K LANTZ WILLIAM J & VICKY L GOERS RODNEY W & THERESE C CUMMINGS 8642 FLAMINGO DR 1601 LYMAN BLVD 1570 BLUEBILL TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8558 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9402 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8570 STEVEN A & ROSALYN MASTERSON MARK J & CARMEN H EDMAN NATHAN P & TONYA R STIER 1574 BLUEBILL TRL 1572 BLUEBILL TRL 8721 OSPREY LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8570 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8570 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8566 ROBERT D & DEBRA L REMKE J DAVID FEIL PAUL A & PEGGY D BONK 8648 FLAMINGO DR 8719 OSPREY LN 8649 ALISA LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8558 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8565 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9377 THOMAS R & BETH K NAVARA STEPHEN M & RHONDA K PRIEM DAVID G & ANA R PORATH B652 FLAMINGO DR 8847 FLAMINGO DR 8665 ALISA LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8558 CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -8559 CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 -9377 JIM O & CAROL VONGKAYSONE JOEL J & KATHLEEN R BODIN PAUL N & SUSAN R HERBY 8664 ALISA LN 8655 FLAMINGO DR 8660 FLAMINGO DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9377 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8559 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -8558 THOMAS M & CARRIE CHRISTENSEN LONNIE L & SHERYL R KOSTER JOHN W & SHARON K HARDEL 8681 ALISA LN 8680 ALISA LN 8663 FLAMINGO DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9377 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -9377 CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 -8559 CRAIG J & JOAN C RENIER CYNTHIA F BONGARD,TRUSTEE & DANIEL C & MELANIE A MERTES 8668 FLAMINGO DR JAMES A BERNARDS,TRUSTEE 8671 FLAMINGO DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8558 8831 AUDUBON RD CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8559 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9407 TIMOTHY M DA & A STEPHANIE A DATHOMAS GARY DREWISKE DAVID W & JEAN M HESS UGHERTY KLEIN 8676 FLAMINGO DR 8682 FLAMINGO DR CHA NHASSEN . MN 55317 -8.559 FLAMINGO CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8558 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -85% HA MATTHEW E & NANCY S LIPINSKI PATRICK WALSH & KEVIN A & ANNE G ROHE 8690 FLAMINGO DR MEREDITH E SANDSTROM 8696 FLAMINGO DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8558 8731 AUDUBON RD CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8558 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8411 DANIEL J & CARLEEN M W IERSMA ROSEANNE M BOYUM MARK K & TRACY A UNDESTAD 8750 SUNSET TRL 8805 SUNSET TRL 8800 SUNSET TRL CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9136 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9404 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9137 RONALD W & CAROL M ENTINGER DANA W & SUSAN M MULLER TIMOTHY C BOYCE & 8851 AUDUBON RD 8850 SUNSET TRL TANA I ERICKSON CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9407 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9137 8941 AUDUBON RD CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8412 TUOI VAN IRAN & CHARLES E JR & PATRICIA HANSEN JEFFREY S & LEE ANN FRANZ 890 T 1561 LYMAN BLVD 8950 SUNSET TRL CHANHASSEN, 8900 SUNSET CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9403 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9100 MN 55317 -9100 M GAYLE O & LOIS J DEGLER RSEY & DORSEY TRUSTEES OF TRUSTS DODOLYMAN BLVD 1630 LYMAN BLVD 1551 C CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9402 HANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9403 Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) STONEFIELD Rezoning & Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-37 1601 Lyman Boulevard City of Chanhassen �a w.aa m r i I OI ! - a I r.r a,n SUBJECT ^^"�°•" J SITE m y. O Lyman Bhd IC. R. 19) L man Blvd (C. 8 Q� PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT, LLC City of Chanhassen Date Type Reference 11/3/2005 Bill 11/1/2005 Original Amt. Balance Due Discount 237.00 237.00 Check Amount 11031 Payment 237.00 237.00 Chanhassen Bank - G Planning Case #05-37 - Stonefield 237.00 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Payee: PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT LLC Date: 11/10/2005 Time: 10:58am Receipt Number: DW / 6779 Clerk: DANIELLE GIS LIST 05-37 STONEFIELD ITEM REFERENCE AMOUNT ------------------------------------------- GIS GIS LIST 05-37 STONEFIELD GIS LIST 237.00 --------------- Total: 237.00 Check 11031 237.00 --------------- Change: 0.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT! SCANNED Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 15 8. On the utility plan: a. Show all the proposed storm sewer pipe type, size and class. b. Show the sanitary sewer pipe slope and class. c. Show watermain pipe class (C900). d. Add a storm sewer schedule. e. Show the existing storm sewer between Lots I & 2, Block 1 within the center of the 20 - foot utility easement. f. Show the stormwater manholes rim and invert elevations. g. Add a note to remove the temporary pond outlet control structure. h. The last street -accessible storm manhole discharging to the stormwater pond must be manhole with sump. i. Add a note: any connection to an existing structure must be core drilled. j. Extend the storm sewer farther to the south along the proposed street. k. Remove Lots 7 and 8 backyard storm sewer and add a storm sewer along the property line between Lots 4 and 5 and between Lots 8 and 9 block 4. 9. On the grading plan: a. Show Type II silt fence adjacent to wetland, pond, creeks, etc. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Use class 5 storm sewer in the roadway; revise the note under general grading and drainage notes accordingly. d. Extend the swale between Lots 1 and 2, Block 4 farther to the east. 10. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City s Building Department must be obtained. In addition, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. 11. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,955.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,525.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may will be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. 12. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 13. Any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. 14. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. 15. The developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and construction of the lift station and forcemain and any associated costs. Stonefreld Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 16 16. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 17. Add a "dead-end road" sign at the cul-de-sac. 18. On the plat, show all existing and proposed street names. 19. Add City Detail Plate Nos. 1001, 1002, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1009, 2001, 2101, 2109, 2110, 2201, 2204, 3101, 3102, 3104, 3106, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5200, 5203, 5204, 5206, 5214, 5215, 5216, 5217, 5221, 5232, 5234, 5240, 5241, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A and 5313. 20. Show the street lights and a stop sign on the plans. 21. Submit public utility plans and profile for staff review. 22. City Forester's Conditions: a. A minimum of two overstory trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. b. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. c. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. d. Tree preservation on site shall be according to tree preservation plans dated 10/14/05. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 23. In the absence of parkland dedication, it is recommended that Stonefield pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final platting. At today's rate, these fees would total $120,000 (30 lots x $4,000). Additionally, the applicant is required to construct the neighborhood asphalt trail connector to the property line as depicted on their preliminary plan submittals. 24. Water Resource Coordinator's Conditions: a. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetland D. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. b. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 17 c. The applicant shall work with the City's consultant to accommodate regional and site- specific storm water needs. d. The approximate location and extent of drain tile shall be shown on the plans. The applicant shall provide details as to whether the file line will be removed, abandoned in place or remain. If the rile is to remain, the flow from the file shall be accommodated in the design of the storm water management plan. e. The applicant shall provide rate control and storm water treatment to reduce off-site impacts. To provide a low -gradient means for controlling rate and volume, the applicant shall consider cooperating with the City to construct a wetland in the rear portions of any number of Lots 1-8, Block 3. In the event that the applicant is interested in pursuing wetland construction for banking purposes, this planning shall be integrated with the City's consultant's storm water infrastructure planning. f. Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) shall be provided over all existing wetlands, storm water infrastructure and storm water ponds. g• Lots 9 12, Bleek 3 shall be eustem gfaded to Fitipimize exposed soils and maxifnize tFee presewatien. The developer asserts that, due to the steep grade in the southern portion of the property, custom grading would not save any additional trees. In addition, the developer maintains that the slope of the road and the location of the retaining wall make custom grading lots impractical. If the developer demonstrates to the satisfaction of staff that custom grading for their typical house pad would not result in additional significant tree preservation, mass grading of this area may be approved. h. The existing outlet structure of Pond A shall be removed and replaced in accordance with the City's standard detail. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) shall be provided for the pond. i. The portion of the silt fence that runs from the pipeline easement through Lot 7, Block 3 shall be moved upslope to the west by 30 to 60 feet to more clearly define the grading limits. The area of property between the silt fence and the gully and property line shall be seeded and mulched to control weeds and get a desirable cover crop in areas that were recently farmed. j. A temporary basin shall be constructed in the vicinity of Lots 6 and 7, Block 3. The temporary sediment basin shall be installed prior to disturbing upslope area. A temporary perforated riser and stable emergency overflow (EOF) for the basin shall be installed; details shall be included in the plan. The basin shall be properly sized for the watershed area, according to NPDES requirements (i.e. The basins must provide storage below the outlet pipe for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2 -year, 24-hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shall the basin provide less than 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe from each acre drained to the basin). Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 18 k. Chanhassen Type 2 silt fence shall be provided for the perimeter of the site up to Lot 10, Block 3. From there, Type 1 may be used. Silt fence shall be shown on the plans around Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. Curbside inlet controls are needed; Wimco type or ESS type (or approved similar protection) inlet controls shall be used. Curbside inlet protection shall be provided for existing inlets adjacent to the site exit on Osprey Lane. City standard inlet protection details 5302 and 5302A shall be included in the plans. The proposed rear yard catch basin protection shall be revised; Wimco type, ESS type or equal must be used. The proposed silt fence shall be installed with additional rock around Chanhassen type 1 silt fence. m. The plans shall be revised to show energy dissipation for the flared end section on Lot 7, Block 3. n. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time flames: Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. o. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. p. In order to fund the maintenance and expansion of the BC -P4.10 storm water pond and construction of additional capacity, the costs will be allocated among the benefiting properties. The total cost of materials and construction will be divided by the number of acres in the resulting subwatershed. The City will be responsible for the acres contributing from land already developed, park land and land to be developed in the future (e.g., the Bongard parcel). The developer will be responsible for the acres contributing from their development. If, for any reason, the regional storm water facility is not constructed, the developer will be responsible for providing storm water quality and quantity management on the subject property and paying Surface Water Management connection charges in accordance with City Code. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $65,364. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 19 q. In conjunction with the BC -P4.10 storm water ponding project, land in addition to the land shown in Outlot A may be required. At this time, the estimated amount of land is approximately 0.5 acres. The developer and the City will seek to agree upon the terms of the use of land for ponding should additional land be required. The developer, if required, shall provide additional land for ponding. 25. Fire Marshall Conditions: a. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be either removed from site or chipped. b. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. c. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. d. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. e. Fire hydrant spacing is acceptable. f. Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 26. Building Official Conditions: a. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. b. Demolition permits must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site. c. The developer must submit a list of proposed street names for review and approval prior to final plat of the property. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 20 d. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. e. Separate sewer and water services must be provided each lot. f. Existing wells and on-site sewage treatment systems on the site must be abandoned in accordance with State Law and City Code. 27. The retaining walls shall be maintained by a Homeowners Association. 28. The City shall not be responsible for maintenance of storm water infrastructure on Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block 3." ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Affidavit of Mailing and Public Hearing Notice. 4. Potential footprints for houses to be built within the Stonefield Subdivision. 5. Letter from the developer extending the deadline to complete this application to 120 days. 6. Preliminary plat dated "Received November 18, 2005". g:\plan\2005 planning cam\05-37 stonefield (Boas pmpertY)\Staff report.doc Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 15 8. On the utility plan: a. Show all the proposed storm sewer pipe type, size and class. b. Show the sanitary sewer pipe slope and class. c. Show watermain pipe class (C900). d. Add a storm sewer schedule. e. Show the existing storm sewer between Lots 1 & 2, Block 1 within the center of the 20 - foot utility easement. f. Show the stormwater manholes rim and invert elevations. g. Add a note to remove the temporary pond outlet control structure. It. The last street -accessible storm manhole discharging to the stormwater pond must be manhole with sump. i. Add a note: any connection to an existing structure must be core drilled. j. Extend the storm sewer farther to the south along the proposed street. k. Remove Lots 7 and 8 backyard storm sewer and add a storm sewer along the property line between Lots 4 and 5 and between Lots 8 and 9 block 4. 9. On the grading plan: a. Show Type II silt fence adjacent to wetland, pond, creeks, etc. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Use class 5 storm sewer in the roadway; revise the note under general grading and drainage notes accordingly. d. Extend the swale between Lots 1 and 2, Block 4 farther to the east. 10. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. In addition, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. 11. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2005 hunk hookup charge is $1,458.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,955.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,525.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may will be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. 12. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 13. Any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. 14. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. 15. The developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and construction of the lift station and forcemain and any associated costs. r Stonefleld Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 16 16. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 17. Add a "dead-end road" sign at the cul-de-sac. 18. On the plat, show all existing and proposed street names. 19. Add City Detail Plate Nos. 1001, 1002, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1009, 2001, 2101, 2109, 2110, 2201, 2204, 3101, 3102, 3104, 3106, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5200, 5203, 5204, 5206, 5214, 5215, 5216, 5217, 5221, 5232, 5234, 5240, 5241, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A and 5313. 20. Show the street lights and a stop sign on the plans. 21. Submit public utility plans and profile for staff review. 22. City Forester's Conditions: a. A minimum of two overstory trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. b. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. c. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. d. Tree preservation on site shall be according to tree preservation plans dated 10/14/05. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 23. In the absence of parkland dedication, it is recommended that Stonefield pay fiill park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final platting. At today's rate, these fees would total $120,000 (30 lots x $4,000). Additionally, the applicant is required to construct the neighborhood asphalt trail connector to the property line as depicted on their preliminary plan submittals. 24. Water Resource Coordinator's Conditions: a. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetland D. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. b. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. V. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 17 c. The applicant shall work with the City's consultant to accommodate regional and site- specific storm water needs. d. The approximate location and extent of drain tile shall be shown on the plans. The applicant shall provide details as to whether the tile line will be removed, abandoned in place or remain. If the tile is to remain, the flow from the tile shall be accommodated in the design of the storm water management plan. e. The applicant shall provide rate control and storm water treatment to reduce off-site impacts. To provide a low -gradient means for controlling rate and volume, the applicant shall consider cooperating with the City to construct a wetland in the rear portions of any number of Lots 1-8, Block 3. In the event that the applicant is interested in pursuing wetland construction for banking purposes, this planning shall be integrated with the City's consultant's storm water infrastructure planning. f. Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) shall be provided over all existing wetlands, storm water infrastructure and storm water ponds. g• Lots 9 12, Block 3 shall be eustam gFaded to niinimim expesed soils and maximize tFee preseF�,Mieri. The developer asserts that, due to the steep grade in the southern portion of the property, custom grading would not save any additional trees. In addition, the developer maintains that the slope of the road and the location of the retaining wall make custom grading lots impractical. If the developer demonstrates to the satisfaction of staff that custom grading for their typical house pad would not result in additional significant tree preservation, mass grading of this area may be approved. h. The existing outlet structure of Pond A shall be removed and replaced in accordance with the City's standard detail. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) shall be provided for the pond. i. The portion of the silt fence that runs from the pipeline easement through Lot 7, Block 3 shall be moved upslope to the west by 30 to 60 feet to more clearly define the grading limits. The area of property between the silt fence and the gully and property line shall be seeded and mulched to control weeds and get a desirable cover crop in areas that were recently farmed. j. A temporary basin shall be constructed in the vicinity of Lots 6 and 7, Block 3. The temporary sediment basin shall be installed prior to disturbing upslope area. A temporary perforated riser and stable emergency overflow (EOF) for the basin shall be installed; details shall be included in the plan. The basin shall be properly sized for the watershed area, according to NPDES requirements (i.e. The basins must provide storage below the outlet pipe for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2 -year, 24-hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shall the basin provide less than 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe from each acre drained to the basin). V, Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 18 k. Chanhassen Type 2 silt fence shall be provided for the perimeter of the site up to Lot 10, Block 3. From there, Type 1 may be used. Silt fence shall be shown on the plans around Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. 1. Curbside inlet controls are needed; Wimco type or ESS type (or approved similar protection) inlet controls shall be used. Curbside inlet protection shall be provided for existing inlets adjacent to the site exit on Osprey Lane. City standard inlet protection details 5302 and 5302A shall be included in the plans. The proposed rear yard catch basin protection shall be revised; Wimco type, ESS type or equal must be used. The proposed silt fence shall be installed with additional rock around Chanhassen type 1 silt fence. m. The plans shall be revised to show energy dissipation for the flared end section on Lot 7, Block 3. n. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slove Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. o. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. p. In order to fund the maintenance and expansion of the BC -P4.10 storm water pond and construction of additional capacity, the costs will be allocated among the benefiting properties. The total cost of materials and construction will be divided by the number of acres in the resulting subwatershed. The City will be responsible for the acres contributing from land already developed, park land and land to be developed in the future (e.g., the Bongard parcel). The developer will be responsible for the acres contributing from their development. If, for any reason, the regional storm water facility is not constructed, the developer will be responsible for providing storm water quality and quantity management on the subject property and paying Surface Water Management connection charges in accordance with City Code. At this time, the estimated total SV;W fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $65,364. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 19 q. In conjunction with the BC -P4.10 storm water ponding project, land in addition to the land shown in Outlot A may be required. At this time, the estimated amount of land is approximately 0.5 acres. The developer and the City will seek to agree upon the terms of the use of land for ponding should additional land be required. The developer, if required, shall provide additional land for ponding. 25. Fire Marshall Conditions: a. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be either removed from site or chipped. b. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. c. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. d. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. e. Fire hydrant spacing is acceptable. f. Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 26. Building Official Conditions: a. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. b. Demolition permits must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site. c. The developer must submit a list of proposed street names for review and approval prior to final plat of the property. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 20 d. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. e. Separate sewer and water services must be provided each lot. f. Existing wells and on-site sewage treatment systems on the site must be abandoned in accordance with State Law and City Code. 27. The retaining walls shall be maintained by a Homeowners Association. 28. The City shall not be responsible for maintenance of storm water infrastructure on Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block K' ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Affidavit of Mailing and Public Hearing Notice. 4. Potential footprints for houses to be built within the Stonefield Subdivision. 5. Letter from the developer extending the deadline to complete this application to 120 days. 6. Preliminary plat dated "Received November 18, 2005". gAplan\2005 planning cases\05-37 stonefield (Baas pmperty)\staff reportAm Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 15 8. On the utility plan: a. Show all the proposed storm sewer pipe type, size and class. b. Show the sanitary sewer pipe slope and class. c. Show watermain pipe class (C900). d. Add a storm sewer schedule. e. Show the existing storm sewer between Lots I & 2, Block 1 within the center of the 20 - foot utility easement. f. Show the stormwater manholes rim and invert elevations. g. Add a note to remove the temporary pond outlet control structure. h. The last street -accessible storm manhole discharging to the stormwater pond must be manhole with sump. i. Add a note: any connection to an existing structure must be core drilled. j. Extend the storm sewer farther to the south along the proposed street. k. Remove Lots 7 and 8 backyard storm sewer and add a storm sewer along the property line between Lots 4 and 5 and between Lots 8 and 9 block 4. 9. On the grading plan: a. Show Type II silt fence adjacent to wetland, pond, creeks, etc. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Use class 5 storm sewer in the roadway; revise the note under general grading and drainage notes accordingly. d. Extend the swale between Lots 1 and 2, Block 4 farther to the east. 10. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. In addition, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. 11. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,955.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,525.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may will be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. 12. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 13. Any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. 14. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. 15. The developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and construction of the lift station and forcemain and any associated costs. 14 Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 16 16. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 17. Add a "dead-end road" sign at the cul-de-sac. 18. On the plat, show all existing and proposed street names. 19. Add City Detail Plate Nos. 1001, 1002, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1009, 2001, 2101, 2109, 2110, 2201, 2204, 3101, 3102, 3104, 3106, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5200, 5203, 5204, 5206, 5214, 5215, 5216, 5217, 5221, 5232, 5234, 5240, 5241, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A and 5313. 20. Show the street lights and a stop sign on the plans. 21. Submit public utility plans and profile for staff review. 22. City Forester's Conditions: a. A minimum of two overstory trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. b. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. c. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. d. Tree preservation on site shall be according to tree preservation plans dated 10/14/05. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 23. In the absence of parkland dedication, it is recommended that Stonefield pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final platting. At today's rate, these fees would total $120,000 (30 lots x $4,000). Additionally, the applicant is required to construct the neighborhood asphalt trail connector to the property line as depicted on their preliminary plan submittals. 24. Water Resource Coordinator's Conditions: a. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetland D. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. b. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. IS Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 17 c. The applicant shall work with the City's consultant to accommodate regional and site- specific storm water needs. d. The approximate location and extent of drain tile shall be shown on the plans. The applicant shall provide details as to whether the tile line will be removed, abandoned in place or remain. If the tile is to remain, the flow from the tile shall be accommodated in the design of the storm water management plan. e. The applicant shall provide rate control and storm water treatment to reduce off-site impacts. To provide a low -gradient means for controlling rate and volume, the applicant shall consider cooperating with the City to construct a wetland in the rear portions of any number of Lots 1-8, Block 3. In the event that the applicant is interested in pursuing wetland construction for banking purposes, this planning shall be integrated with the City's consultant's storm water infrastructure planning. f. Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) shall be provided over all existing wetlands, storm water infrastructure and storm water ponds. g• Lots 9 12, Week 3 shall be eastem gFaded to minimize e*pesed soils and mMimiZA tr-as preservatien. The developer asserts that, due to the steep grade in the southern portion of the property, custom grading would not save any additional trees. In addition, the developer maintains that the slope of the road and the location of the retaining wall make custom grading lots impractical. If the developer demonstrates to the satisfaction of staff that custom grading for their typical house pad would not result in additional significant tree preservation, mass grading of this area may be approved. h. The existing outlet structure of Pond A shall be removed and replaced in accordance with the City's standard detail. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) shall be provided for the pond. The portion of the silt fence that runs from the pipeline easement through Lot 7, Block 3 shall be moved upslope to the west by 30 to 60 feet to more clearly define the grading limits. The area of property between the silt fence and the gully and property line shall be seeded and mulched to control weeds and get a desirable cover crop in areas that were recently farmed. j. A temporary basin shall be constructed in the vicinity of Lots 6 and 7, Block 3. The temporary sediment basin shall be installed prior to disturbing upslope area. A temporary perforated riser and stable emergency overflow (EOF) for the basin shall be installed; details shall be included in the plan. The basin shall be properly sized for the watershed area, according to NPDES requirements (i.e. The basins must provide storage below the outlet pipe for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2 -year, 24-hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shall the basin provide less than 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe from each acre drained to the basin). 10 Stonefteld Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 18 k. Chanhassen Type 2 silt fence shall be provided for the perimeter of the site up to Lot 10, Block 3. From there, Type 1 maybe used. Silt fence shall be shown on the plans around Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. Curbside inlet controls are needed; Wimco type or ESS type (or approved similar protection) inlet controls shall be used. Curbside inlet protection shall be provided for existing inlets adjacent to the site exit on Osprey Lane. City standard inlet protection details 5302 and 5302A shall be included in the plans. The proposed rear yard catch basin protection shall be revised; Wimco type, ESS type or equal must be used. The proposed silt fence shall be installed with additional rock around Chanhassen type 1 silt fence. in. The plans shall be revised to show energy dissipation for the flared end section on Lot 7, Block 3. n. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: 1)w of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. o. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. p. In order to fund the maintenance and expansion of the BC -P4.10 storm water pond and construction of additional capacity, the costs will be allocated among the benefiting properties. The total cost of materials and construction will be divided by the number of acres in the resulting subwatershed. The City will be responsible for the acres contributing from land already developed, park land and land to be developed in the future (e.g., the Bongard parcel). The developer will be responsible for the acres contributing from their development. If, for any reason, the regional storm water facility is not constructed, the developer will be responsible for providing storm water quality and quantity management on the subject property and paying Surface Water Management connection charges in accordance with City Code. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $65,364. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 19 q. In conjunction with the BC -P4.10 storm water ponding project, land in addition to the land shown in Outlot A may be required. At this time, the estimated amount of land is approximately 0.5 acres. The developer and the City will seek to agree upon the terms of the use of land for ponding should additional land be required. The developer, if required, shall provide additional land for ponding. 25. Fire Marshall Conditions: a. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be either removed from site or chipped. b. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. c. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. d. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. e. Fire hydrant spacing is acceptable. f. Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. g. A on! do sm sWl be designed inte Rhe, and- of Vhe now "esed reads by let 12. DifRoRsionq shot 'd he W foot in diameteF Submit details to Chanhassen City Engineer and GhapAmssen Fire Marshal for- review aPA approval. 26. Building Official Conditions: a. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. b. Demolition permits must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site. c. The developer must submit a list of proposed street names for review and approval prior to final plat of the property. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 20 d. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. e. Separate sewer and water services must be provided each lot. f. Existing wells and on-site sewage treatment systems on the site must be abandoned in accordance with State Law and City Code. 27. The retaining walls shall be maintained by a Homeowners Association. 28. The City shall not be responsible for maintenance of storm water infrastructure on Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block K' ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Affidavit of Mailing and Public Hearing Notice. 4. Potential footprints for houses to be built within the Stonefield Subdivision. 5. Letter from the developer extending the deadline to complete this application to 120 days. 6. Preliminary plat dated "Received November 18, 2005". g:\plan\2005 planning casm\05-37 stonefield (goers pmperty)\staff report.doc ps Stonefreld Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 15 8. On the utility plan: a. Show all the proposed storm sewer pipe type, size and class. In. Show the sanitary sewer pipe slope and class. c. Show watermain pipe class (C900). d. Add a storm sewer schedule. e. Show the existing storm sewer between Lots 1 & 2, Block 1 within the center of the 20 - foot utility easement. f. Show the stormwater manholes rim and invert elevations. g. Add a note to remove the temporary pond outlet control structure. In. The last street -accessible storm manhole discharging to the stormwater pond must be manhole with sump. i. Add a note: any connection to an existing structure must be core drilled. j. Extend the storm sewer farther to the south along the proposed street. k. Remove Lots 7 and 8 backyard storm sewer and add a storm sewer along the property line between Lots 4 and 5 and between Lots 8 and 9 block 4. 9. On the grading plan: a. Show Type II silt fence adjacent to wetland, pond, creeks, etc. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Use class 5 storm sewer in the roadway; revise the note under general grading and drainage notes accordingly. d. Extend the swale between Lots 1 and 2, Block 4 farther to the east. 10. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. In addition, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. 11. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,955.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,525.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may will be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. 12. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 13. Any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. 14. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. 15. The developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and construction of the lift station and forcemain and any associated costs. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 16 16. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 17. Add a "dead-end road" sign at the cul-de-sac. 18. On the plat, show all existing and proposed street names. 19. Add City Detail Plate Nos. 1001, 1002, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1009, 2001, 2101, 2109, 2110, 2201, 2204, 3101, 3102, 3104, 3106, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5200, 5203, 5204, 5206, 5214, 5215, 5216, 5217, 5221, 5232, 5234, 5240, 5241, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A and 5313. 20. Show the street lights and a stop sign on the plans. 21. Submit public utility plans and profile for staff review. 22. City Forester's Conditions: a. A minimum of two overstory trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. b. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. c. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. d. Tree preservation on site shall be according to tree preservation plans dated 10/14/05. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 23. In the absence of parkland dedication, it is recommended that Stonefield pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final platting. At today's rate, these fees would total $120,000 (30 lots x $4,000). Additionally, the applicant is required to construct the neighborhood asphalt trail connector to the property line as depicted on their preliminary plan submittals. 24. Water Resource Coordinator's Conditions: a. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetland D. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. b. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. VP Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 17 c. The applicant shall work with the City's consultant to accommodate regional and site- specific storm water needs. d. The approximate location and extent of drain tile shall be shown on the plans. The applicant shall provide details as to whether the file line will be removed, abandoned in place or remain. If the file is to remain, the flow from the file shall be accommodated in the design of the storm water management plan. e. The applicant shall provide rate control and storm water treatment to reduce off-site impacts. To provide a low -gradient means for controlling rate and volume, the applicant shall consider cooperating with the City to construct a wetland in the rear portions of any number of Lots 1-8, Block 3. In the event that the applicant is interested in pursuing wetland construction for banking purposes, this planning shall be integrated with the City's consultant's storm water infrastructure planning. f. Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) shall be provided over all existing wetlands, storm water infrastructure and storm water ponds. g• Lots 8 12, Bleek 3 shall be eustem graded to minimize exposed soils and maximi;,R tfee presen,atien. The developer asserts that, due to the steep grade in the southern portion of the property, custom grading would not save any additional trees. In addition, the developer maintains that the slope of the road and the location of the retaining wall make custom grading lots impractical. If the developer demonstrates to the satisfaction of staff that custom grading for their typical house pad would not result in additional significant tree preservation, mass grading of this area may be approved. h. The existing outlet structure of Pond A shall be removed and replaced in accordance with the City's standard detail. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) shall be provided for the pond. The portion of the silt fence that runs from the pipeline easement through Lot 7, Block 3 shall be moved upslope to the west by 30 to 60 feet to more clearly define the grading limits. The area of property between the silt fence and the gully and property line shall be seeded and mulched to control weeds and get a desirable cover crop in areas that were recently farmed. j. A temporary basin shall be constructed in the vicinity of Lots 6 and 7, Block 3. The temporary sediment basin shall be installed prior to disturbing upslope area. A temporary perforated riser and stable emergency overflow (EOF) for the basin shall be installed; details shall be included in the plan. The basin shall be properly sized for the watershed area, according to NPDES requirements (i.e. The basins must provide storage below the outlet pipe for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2 -year, 24-hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shall the basin provide less than 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe from each acre drained to the basin). Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 18 k. Chanhassen Type 2 silt fence shall be provided for the perimeter of the site up to Lot 10, Block 3. From there, Type 1 maybe used. Silt fence shall be shown on the plans around Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. Curbside inlet controls are needed; Wimco type or ESS type (or approved similar protection) inlet controls shall be used. Curbside inlet protection shall be provided for existing inlets adjacent to the site exit on Osprey Lane. City standard inlet protection details 5302 and 5302A shall be included in the plans. The proposed rear yard catch basin protection shall be revised; Wimco type, ESS type or equal must be used. The proposed silt fence shall be installed with additional rock around Chanhassen type 1 silt fence. m. The plans shall be revised to show energy dissipation for the flared end section on Lot 7, Block 3. n. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slone Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. o. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. p. In order to fund the maintenance and expansion of the BC -P4.10 storm water pond and construction of additional capacity, the costs will be allocated among the benefiting properties. The total cost of materials and construction will be divided by the number of acres in the resulting subwatershed. The City will be responsible for the acres contributing from land already developed, park land and land to be developed in the future (e.g., the Bongard parcel). The developer will be responsible for the acres contributing from their development. If, for any reason, the regional storm water facility is not constructed, the developer will be responsible for providing storm water quality and quantity management on the subject property and paying Surface Water Management connection charges in accordance with City Code. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $65,364. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 19 q. In conjunction with the BC -P4.10 storm water ponding project, land in addition to the land shown in Outlot A may be required. At this time, the estimated amount of land is approximately 0.5 acres. The developer and the City will seek to agree upon the terms of the use of land for ponding should additional land be required. The developer, if required, shall provide additional land for ponding. 25. Fire Marshall Conditions: a. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be either removed from site or chipped. b. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. c. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. d. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. e. Fire hydrant spacing is acceptable. f. Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 26. Building Official Conditions: a. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. b. Demolition permits must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site. c. The developer must submit a list of proposed street names for review and approval prior to final plat of the property. Stonefteld Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 20 d. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. e. Separate sewer and water services must be provided each lot. f. Existing wells and on-site sewage treatment systems on the site must be abandoned in accordance with State Law and City Code. 27. The retaining walls shall be maintained by a Homeowners Association. 28. The City shall not be responsible for maintenance of storm water infrastructure on Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block K' ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Affidavit of Mailing and Public Hearing Notice. 4. Potential footprints for houses to be built within the Stonefield Subdivision. 5. Letter from the developer extending the deadline to complete this application to 120 days. 6. Preliminary plat dated "Received November 18, 2005". g:\plan\2005 planning cwm\05-37 stonefield (goers pmperty)\staff report.doc Location Map STONEFIELD Rezoning & Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-37 1601 Lyman Boulevard City of Chanhassen SCANNED for: PRELIMINARY STORM WATER RUNOFF CALCULATIONS Stonefield Chanhassen, MN Plowshares Development, LLC. 1851 Lake Drive West, Suite 550 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone (952) 937-5150, Fax (952) 937-5822 October 14, 2005 Project # 2005-1114.00 SUMMARY The attached storm water runoff and ponding calculations are based on Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) and The Soil Conservation Service Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Method incorporated into the software program Hydraflow by Intelisolve, version 7.10. An existing pond located on the east property boundary was expanded into the project to provide additional flood and treatment storage to provide both rate control and quality control for the proposed development. The goal for rate control on this project was not to exceed existing discharge rates for the 10 and 100 -year events. The goal for quality control was to obtain a phosphorus removal efficiency of 60% or greater for the storm water contributed by the property by using "PONDNET" by William Walker. SITE CONDITIONS The site consists of Type "B" soils, and curve numbers were obtained from "Technical Release 55: Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds." A curve number of 55 was used for the existing condition of woods, 70 for existing residential, 78 for crops, 98 for impervious surfaces, 61 for maintained grass and 74 for farmstead. For the proposed conditions a curve number of 72 was used for residential single-family development. Refer to attachments for existing and proposed drainage areas. ROUTING Under existing conditions, 94.85 acres of existing development drains to an existing storm water pond system ultimately discharging to a ravine located along the southeast boundary of the site. Another 3.64 acres of existing development and open area drains to an existing temporary pond discharging to the ravine and the remaining 26.28 acres surface drains directly to the existing ravine. Under post -development conditions, 96.78 acres of existing development and 21.49 acres of diverted offsite drainage and proposed development drain to an existing storm water pond system expanded for the proposed development and discharged to the existing ravine. The remaining 6.55 acres of rear yard area surface drains directly to the ravine. RATE CONTROL An evaluation was made for both the pre -development and post -development peak runoff rates for the entire site. By diverting 23.42 additional acres of drainage to the storm water pond system and installing an additional 33" outlet to the expanded pond the peak runoff rates were within rate control requirements. The following is a table summarizing pre -development and post -development peak runoff rates for the 10 -year, and 100 -year storms: PEAK RUNOFF RATES Pre -Development Post -Development Drainage 10 yr 100 yr 10 yr 100 yr cfs cfs cfs cfs Existing Temporary 4.61 7.76 -- Pond Existing Pond System 43.64 116.08 49.14 108.10 Surface Drainage 27.16 55.53 4.81 11.07 Directly to Ravine Peak Discharge to 50.77 135.36 50.40 110.97 Ravine 'The peak discharge to ravine flows were determined by combining all the discharge hydrographs into a reach to account for time lag differences. * WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. (952) 937-5150 SUMMARY The following is a table summarizing the rate control pond system: Pond Drainage NWL Dead 100 -yr Live 100 -yr 100 -yr Overflow Area (feet) Storage HWL Storage Inflow Discharge Elevation acre acre-feet feet acre-feet) (cfs) (cfs) eet Existing 94.85 917.0 2.70 920.1 4.50 136.42 116.08 918.8 Pond Proposed 118.27 917.0 5.15 920.9 7.05 163.15 108.10 921.0 Pond 1 WATER QUALITY The PONDNET model was used to determine the phosphorus removal efficiency of the proposed pond. The added pond phosphorus loading is 55.2 lbs/yr and the increase in removal is 44.4 lbs/yr providing a removal efficiency for the proposed development of 80.4% I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Curtis R. Neft, P.E. License. No. 44198 /61//0i / 425 Date * WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. (952) 937-5150 02005 WmtwooE PrOlessimol Sm Cim. Inc Westwood Professional Services, k. I eW ==.—.= ceM n.ne, ew ss)u dLL t� IM.:3Dl11-1150 Fac fsl-f))Stll OY �1�� IIFF� 1� It � �_J�rte—�—F—�� or m I ilepSsW !� m Plowshares Development, LLC r. m 5r 1>_r F.wr 1651 Lkc Once W W CI1011A0031,0/fi1111cm,�t 553)7 Cd1 48 Hcw, before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL T.in City Arm 651-454-0002 Nn. Tdl Free 1 -IM -252-1166 i �I 1 0 2110' ♦W 600' i -x xmsnllo)vin oAc rale 10/14/05 1 w 2 Stonefield Pre -Developed Drainage Areas Cal a Hwrs cefwe digging. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (DA -2 TEMP DRt, EXIS" EXIS P PRE COMBINED `Subcat ,Reach 4,n Link PROPOSE POND 1S PROPOSED GOER REAR YARDS 2R;. POST COMBINED DA -5 POST EXISTING DA -4 DEV LOPMENT PROPOSED GEO PROPERTY 3P PROPOSE POND 1S PROPOSED GOER REAR YARDS 2R;. POST COMBINED 05-10-14 Type// 24 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Page 2 10 s/n 002351 n 2005 Hv(1m(:An SnffwnrA Snlufinns I I C 1 n/1 d/900.ri Subcatchment DA -1: EXISTING DEVELOPMENT Runoff = 67.77 cfs @ 12.69 hrs, Volume= 10.205 af, Depth> 1.29" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" Area (ac) CN Description 85.260 70 1/2 acre lots, 25% imp, HSG B 7.510 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 2.080 98 Paved roads w/curbs & sewers 94.850 70 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 61.8 1,600 0.0100 0.4 Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment DA -2: TEMP DRAINAGE Runoff = 8.82 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.441 af, Depth> 1.45" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" Area (ac) CN Description 2.380 70 1/2 acre lots, 25% imp, HSG B 0.770 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.490 98 Paved roads w/curbs & sewers 3.640 72 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 9.8 455 0.0480 0.8 Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment DA -3: EXISTING GOERS PROPERTY Runoff = 27.16 cfs @ 12.32 hrs, Volume= 2.730 af, Depth> 1.25' Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" Area (ac) CN Description 1.030 70 1/2 acre lots, 25% imp, HSG B 5.210 74 Farmsteads, HSG B 6.210 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 10.570 78 Row crops, straight row, Good, HSG B 3.260 61 >75% Grass cover. Good. HSG B 26.280 69 Weighted Average 05-10-14 Type 1124 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Page 3 HydroCAD@ 7.10 s/n 002351 @ 2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/14/2005 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 34.3 1,650 0.0360 Inflow Area = 124.770 ac, Inflow = 50.77 cfs @ Outflow = 50.77 cfs @ 0.8 Lag/CN Method, Reach 1R: PRE COMBINED Inflow Depth > 1.18" for 10 -year event 13.12 hrs, Volume= 12.219 of 13.12 hrs, Volume= 12.219 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 923.78'@ 12.14 hrs Surf.Area= 5,374 sf Storage= 5,122 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 31.1 min calculated for 0.426 of (97% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 19.4 min ( 823.6 - 804.3) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 922.50' 13,250 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic�isted below(Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 922.50 2,600 0 0 925.00 8,000 13,250 13,250 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 922.50' 18.0" x 65.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 922.25' S= 0.0038'P Cc= 0.900 n=0.013 #2 Primary 924.60' 4.0' long x 3.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Coef. (English) 2.44 2.58 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.68 2.68 2.72 2.81 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=4.58 cfs @ 12.14 hrs HW=923.78' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 4.58 cfs @ 3.8 fps) L 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) Pond 2P: EXISTING TEMP POND Inflow Area = 3.640 ac, Inflow Depth > 1.45" for 10 -year event Inflow = 8.82 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.441 of Outflow = 4.61 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.427 af, Atten= 48%, Lag= 7.3 min Primary = 4.61 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.427 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 923.78'@ 12.14 hrs Surf.Area= 5,374 sf Storage= 5,122 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 31.1 min calculated for 0.426 of (97% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 19.4 min ( 823.6 - 804.3) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 922.50' 13,250 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic�isted below(Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 922.50 2,600 0 0 925.00 8,000 13,250 13,250 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 922.50' 18.0" x 65.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 922.25' S= 0.0038'P Cc= 0.900 n=0.013 #2 Primary 924.60' 4.0' long x 3.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Coef. (English) 2.44 2.58 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.68 2.68 2.72 2.81 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=4.58 cfs @ 12.14 hrs HW=923.78' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 4.58 cfs @ 3.8 fps) L 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) 05-10-14 Type// 24 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Page 4 Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 919.30'@ 13.16 hrs Surf.Area= 71,736 sf Storage= 138,832 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 85.4 min calculated for 9.062 of (89% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 52.0 min ( 898.9 - 846.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Pond P-1: EXISTING POND Inflow Area = 94.850 ac, Inflow Depth > 1.29" for 10 -year event Inflow = 67.77 cfs @ 12.69 hrs, Volume= 10.205 of Outflow = 43.64 cfs @ 13.16 hrs, Volume= 9.062 af, Atten= 36%, Lag= 28.0 min Primary = 43.64 cfs @ 13.16 hrs, Volume= 9.062 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 919.30'@ 13.16 hrs Surf.Area= 71,736 sf Storage= 138,832 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 85.4 min calculated for 9.062 of (89% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 52.0 min ( 898.9 - 846.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 917.00' 363,450 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)_isted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 917.00 50,400 0 0 918.00 58,420 54,410 54,410 920.00 78,950 137,370 191,780 922.00 92,720 171,670 363,450 _Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 916.96' 48.0" x 17.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 916.89' S= 0.0041 'P Cc= 0.900 n=0.013 #2 Primary 918.83' 20.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 Primary OutFlow Max=43.59 cfs @ 13.16 hrs HW=919.30' (Free Discharge) �1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 27.22 cfs @ 5.1 fps) 2=13road-Crested Rectangular Weir(Weir Controls 16.37 cfs @ 1.8 fps) 05-10-14 Type 1124 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Page 5 HydroCAD® 7.10 s/n 002351 © 2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/14/2005 Subcatchment DA -1: EXISTING DEVELOPMENT Runoff = 136.42 cfs @ 12.67 hrs, Volume= 19.886 at, Depth> 2.52' Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN Description 85.260 70 1/2 acre lots, 25% imp, HSG B 7.510 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 2.080 98 Paved roads w/curbs & sewers 94.850 70 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) 61.8 1,600 0.0100 0.4 Description Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment DA -2: TEMP DRAINAGE Runoff = 16.64 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.835 af, Depth> 2.75" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN Descriotion 2.380 70 1/2 acre lots, 25% imp, HSG B 0.770 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.490 98 Paved roads w/curbs & sewers 3.640 72 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft1ft) (fUsec) (cfs) 9.8 455 0.0480 0.8 Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment DA -3: EXISTING GOERS PROPERTY Runoff = 55.53 cfs @ 12.31 hrs, Volume= 5.382 af, Depth> 2.46" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN Description 1.030 70 1/2 acre lots, 25% imp, HSG B 5.210 74 Farmsteads, HSG B 6.210 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 10.570 78 Row crops, straight row, Good, HSG B 3.260 61 >75% Grass cover. Good. HSG B 26.280 69 Weighted Average 05-10-14 Type 11 24 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Page 6 Tc (min) Length (feet) Slope (fUft) Velocity Capacity Description (ft/sec) (cfs) 34.3 1,650 0.0360 0.8 Lag/CN Method, Reach 1R: PRE COMBINED Inflow Area = 124.770 ac, Inflow Depth > 2.36" for 100 -year event Inflow = 135.36 cfs @ 12.87 hrs, Volume= 24.576 of Outflow = 135.36 cfs @ 12.87 hrs, Volume= 24.576 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Pond 2P: EXISTING TEMP POND Inflow Area = 3.640 ac, Inflow Depth > 2.75" for 100 -year event Inflow = 16.64 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.835 of Outflow = 7.76 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.817 af, Atten= 53%, Lag= 8.1 min Primary = 7.76 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.817 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 924.55'@ 12.15 hrs Surf.Area= 7,037 sf Storage= 9,897 cf Plug -Flow detention time=26.7 min calculated for 0.817 of (98% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 18.3 min ( 809.2 - 790.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 922.50' 13,250 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismaticyisted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 922.50 2,600 0 0 925.00 8,000 13,250 13,250 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 922.50' 18.0" x 65.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 922.25' S= 0.0038'P Cc= 0.900 n=0.013 #2 Primary 924.60' 4.0' long x 3.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Coef. (English) 2.44 2.58 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.68 2.68 2.72 2.81 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=7.75 cfs @ 12.15 hrs HW=924.55' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 7.75 cfs @ 4.4 fps) L 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) 05-10-14 Type 11 24 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Page 7 HydroCAD® 7.10 s/n 002351 © 2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/14/2005 Pond P-1: EXISTING POND Inflow Area = 94.850 ac, Inflow Depth > 2.52" for 100 -year event Inflow = 136.42 cfs @ 12.67 hrs, Volume= 19.886 of Outflow = 116.08 cfs @ 12.92 hrs, Volume= 18.377 af, Atten= 15%, Lag= 15.1 min Primary = 116.08 cfs @ 12.92 hrs, Volume= 18.377 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 920.05'@ 12.92 hrs Surf.Area= 79,301 sf Storage= 195,820 cf Plug -Flow detention time=57.9 min calculated for 18.316 of (92% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 34.0 min ( 868.1 - 834.1 ) Volume Invert Avail Storage Storage Description #1 917.00' 363,450 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic�isted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 917.00 50,400 0 0 918.00 58,420 54,410 54,410 920.00 78,950 137,370 191,780 922.00 92,720 171,670 363,450 _Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 916.96' 48.0" x 17.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 916.89' S= 0.0041 'P Cc= 0.900 n=0.013 #2 Primary 918.83' 20.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 Primary OutFlow Max=115.86 cfs @ 12.92 hrs HW=920.05' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 44.28 cfs @ 5.9 fps) L 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir(Weir Controls 71.58 cfs @ 2.9 fps) 05-10-14 Type// 24 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Page 8 HydroCAD® 7.10 s/n 002351 © 2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/14/2005 Subcatchment 1S: PROPOSED REAR YARDS Runoff = 4.81 cfs @ 12.35 hrs, Volume= 0.521 af, Depth> 0.95' Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" Area (ac) CN Description 0.600 98 Paved parking & roofs 3.330 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 2.620 60 Woods, Fair HSG B 6.550 64 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fUsec) 35.1 800 0.0140 0.4 Description Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment DA -4: PROPOSED PROPERTY Runoff = 26.85 cfs @ 12.27 hrs, Volume= 2.463 af, Depth> 1.38" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" Area (ac) CN Description 14.070 72 1/3 acre lots, 30% imp, HSG B 5.210 74 Farmsteads, HSG B 2.210 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 21.490 71 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f /sec) 30.6 1,450 0.0330 0.8 Description Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment DA -5: POST EXISTING DEVELOPMENT Runoff = 69.15 cfs @ 12.69 hrs, Volume= 10.413 af, Depth> 1.29" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" Area (ac) CN Description 85.260 70 1/2 acre lots, 25% imp, HSG B 2.580 98 Paved parking & roofs 8.940 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 96.780 70 Weighted Average 05-10-14 Type// 24 -hr 10 -year Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Page 9 HydroCAD® 7.10 s/n 002351 @ 2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/14/2005 Tc min) Length (feet) Slope (ft/ft) 61.8 1,600 0.0100 Description 0.4 Lag/CN Method, Reach 2R: POST COMBINED Inflow Area = 124.820 ac, Inflow Depth > 1.18" for 10 -year event Inflow = 50.40 cfs @ 13.15 hrs, Volume= 12.230 of Outflow = 50.40 cfs @ 13.15 hrs, Volume= 12.230 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 919.34'@ 13.16 hrs Surf.Area= 80,024 sf Storage= 170,715 cf Plug -Flow detention time=75.0 min calculated for 11.709 of (91% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 46.7 min ( 888.8 - 842.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description Pond 3P: PROPOSED POND Inflow Area = 118.270 ac, Inflow Depth > 1.31" for 10 -year event Inflow = 80.96 cfs @ 12.60 hrs, Volume= 12.876 of Outflow = 49.14 cfs @ 13.16 hrs, Volume= 11.709 af, Atten= 39%, Lag= 33.6 min Primary = 49.14 cfs @ 13.16 hrs, Volume= 11.709 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 919.34'@ 13.16 hrs Surf.Area= 80,024 sf Storage= 170,715 cf Plug -Flow detention time=75.0 min calculated for 11.709 of (91% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 46.7 min ( 888.8 - 842.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 917.00' 315,586 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) isted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 917.00 67,595 0 0 918.00 71,131 69,363 69,363 920.00 84,394 155,525 224,888 921.00 97,001 90,698 315,586 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 917.00' 48.0" x 17.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 916.89' S=0.00657' Cc= 0.900 n=0.013 #2 Primary 921.00' 20.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #3 Primary 917.00' 33.0" x 15.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 916.90' S= 0.0067/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.013 Primary OutFlow Max=49.12 cfs @ 13.16 hrs HW=919.34' (Free Discharge) � 1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 28.12 cfs @ 5.3 fps) 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) 3=Culvert (Barrel Controls 21.00 cfs @ 5.2 fps) 05-10-14 Type 1124 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Page 10 HydroCAD® 7.10 s/n 002351 © 2005 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/14/2005 Subcatchment 1S: PROPOSED REAR YARDS Runoff = 11.07 cfs @ 12.32 hrs, Volume= 1.108 af, Depth> 2.03" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN Description 0.600 98 Paved parking & roofs 3.330 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 2.620 60 Woods, Fair, HSG B 6.550 64 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f /sec) 35.1 800 0.0140 0.4 Description Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment DA -4: PROPOSED PROPERTY Runoff = 52.74 cfs @ 12.26 hrs, Volume= 4.727 af, Depth> 2.64" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN Description 14.070 72 1/3 acre lots, 30% imp, HSG B 5.210 74 Farmsteads, HSG B 2.210 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 21.490 71 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Description 30.6 1,450 0.0330 0.8 Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment DA -5: POST EXISTING DEVELOPMENT Runoff = 139.19 cfs @ 12.67 hrs, Volume= 20.291 af, Depth> 2.52" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN DescriDtlon 85.260 70 1/2 acre lots, 25% imp, HSG B 2.580 98 Paved parking & roofs 8.940 61 >75% Grass cover. Good. HSG B 96.780 70 Weighted Average 05-10-14 Type Il 24 -hr 100 -year Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Page 11 HydroCADO 7.10 s/n 002351 @ 2005 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 10/14/2005 Tc min) Length (feet) Slope (ft/ft) Velocity (ft/sec) 61.8 1,600 0.0100 0.4 Description Lag/CN Method, Reach 2R: POST COMBINED Inflow Area = 124.820 aq Inflow Depth > 2.37" for 100 -year event Inflow = 110.97 cfs @ 13.04 hrs, Volume= 24.606 of Outflow = 110.97 cfs @ 13.04 hrs, Volume= 24.606 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Pond 3P: PROPOSED POND Inflow Area = 118.270 aq Inflow Depth > 2.54" for 100 -year event Inflow = 163.15 cfs @ 12.57 hrs, Volume= 25.017 of Outflow = 108.10 cfs @ 13.06 hrs, Volume= 23.498 af, Atten= 34%, Lag= 29.5 min Primary = 108.10 cfs @ 13.06 hrs, Volume= 23.498 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 920.91'@ 13.06 hrs Surf.Area= 95,887 sf Storage= 307,065 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 59.9 min calculated for 23.420 of (94% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 40.0 min ( 869.3 - 829.3 ) _Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 917.00' 315,586 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismaticyisted below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 917.00 67,595 0 0 918.00 71,131 69,363 69,363 920.00 84,394 155,525 224,888 921.00 97,001 90,698 315,586 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 917.00' 48.0" x 17.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 916.89' S=0.0065'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.013 #2 Primary 921.00' 20.0' long x 5.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.34 2.50 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.67 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 2.79 2.88 #3 Primary 917.00' 33.0" x 15.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 916.90' S= 0.0067'P Cc= 0.900 n=0.013 Primary OutFlow Max=108.06 cfs @ 13.06 hrs HW=920.91' (Free Discharge) -1 =Culvert (Barrel Controls 66.04 cfs @ 6.7 fps) 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs) 3=Culvert (Barrel Controls 42.02 cfs @ 7.1 fps) PROJECT TITLE: PROJECT NO.: DESIGNED BY: DESIGNED DATE: Stonefield 2005-1014.00 Curtis Neft October 14. 2005 Existine Storm Water Pond Svstem Station Contour Distance Feet Sq. Ft. Area Ac. Area Ac -ft Storage Cumm. Storage 914 28,657.00 0.66 2 1.63 1.63 916 42,727.00 0.98 1 1.07 2.70 917 50,400.00 1.16 1 1.25 3.94 918 58,420.00 1.34 2 3.14 7.09 920 78,950.00 1.81 2 3.94 11.02 922 92,720.00 2.13 TOTAL 1 11.02 12.39 Proposed Storm Water Pond Svstem Station Contour Distance Feet Sq. Ft. Area Ac. Area Ac -ft Storage Cumm. Stora e 912 15,691.00 0.36 2 1.36 1.36 914 46,134.00 1.06 2 2.36 3.72 916 56,959.00 1.31 1 1.43 5.15 917 67,595.00 1.55 1 1.59 6.74 918 71,131.00 1.63 2 3.57 10.31 920 84,394.00 1.94 1 2.08 12.39 921 97,001.00 2.23 TOTAL 12.39 PONDNET 2.1 W. Walker March 1989 INPUT VARIABLES.... case labels watershed area runoff coefficient pond surface area pond mean depth upstream pond p load upstream pond outflow OUTPUT VARIABLES FLOW AND PHOSPHORUS ROUTING IN POND NETWORKS Press ALT -G for Graphs TITLE--> UNITS acres acres feet lbs/yr ac-ft/yr outflow p load lbs/yr outflow volume ac-ft/yr outflow p conc ppb pond removal % total removal % ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS period length yrs period precipitation inches runoff total p ppb runoff ortho p/total p ac-ft/yr relative decay rate lbs/yr unit runoff in/yr unit export Ibslac-y POND WATER BUDGETS runoff ac-ft/yr upstream pond ac -f lyr total inflow ac-ft/yr outflow ac-ft/yr POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS runoff lbs/yr upstream pond lbs/yr total inflow lbs/yr net sedimentation lbs/yr outflow lbs/yr HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS pond volume acre -ft vlawmo pond volume acre -ft relative volume inches residence time years residence time days overflow rate ft/yr inflow phos conc ppb outflow phos conc ppb p reaction rate 1-rp Existing Pond 94.85 0.4 1.16 2.32 0 0 114.75 126.47 333.84 48.64 48.64 0.5 20 650 0.3 1 16 2.36 126.47 0.00 126.47 126.47 223.44 0.00 223.44 108.69 114.75 2.69 7.90 0.85 0.02 7.77 109.02 650.03 333.84 1.84 0.51 Proposed Pond 118.27 0.4 1.55 3.24 0 0 125.56 157.69 292.96 54.93 54.93 0.5 20 650 0.3 1 16 2.36 157.69 0.00 157.69 157.69 278.61 0.00 278.61 153.05 125.56 5.02 9.86 1.27 0.03 11.62 101.74 650.03 292.96 2.70 0.45 fj 'f 3 %7 ?2B of z{,re7 sf Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) STONEFIELD Rezoning & Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-37 1601 Lyman Boulevard City of Chanhassen I j bm6 e of a z - a I i v � � i *- SUBJECT SITE n V.' ml / NI - a Ly an BNtl(C. 8 e� 0 Qt SCF:'.'..0 E 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 05-37 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, December 6, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Rezoning and Subdivision with Variances on property located at 1601 Lyman Boulevard — STONEFIELD. Applicant: Plowshares Development, LLC. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Sharmeen A]-Jaff, Senior Planner Email: saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1134 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on November 25, 2005) SCANNED PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT, LLC City of Chanhassen Preliminary Plat Application 10/12/2005 11003 2,735.00 05-2-) Chanhassen Bank - G 2,735.00 Stonefteld Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 15 8. On the utility plan: a. Show all the proposed storm sewer pipe type, size and class. b. Show the sanitary sewer pipe slope and class. c. Show watermain pipe class (C900). d. Add a storm sewer schedule. e. Show the existing storm sewer between Lots 1 & 2, Block 1 within the center of the 20 - foot utility easement. f. Show the stormwater manholes rim and invert elevations. g. Add a note to remove the temporary pond outlet control structure. h. The last street -accessible storm manhole discharging to the stormwater pond must be manhole with sump. i. Add a note: any connection to an existing structure must be core drilled. j. Extend the storm sewer farther to the south along the proposed street. k. Remove Lots 7 and 8 backyard storm sewer and add a storm sewer along the property line between Lots 4 and 5 and between Lots 8 and 9 block 4. 9. On the grading plan: a. Show Type II silt fence adjacent to wetland, pond, creeks, etc. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Use class 5 storm sewer in the roadway; revise the note under general grading and drainage notes accordingly. d. Extend the swale between Lots I and 2, Block 4 farther to the east. 10. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. In addition, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. 11. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,955.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,525.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may will be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. 12. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 13. Any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. 14. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. 15. The developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and construction of the lift station and forcemain and any associated costs. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 16 16. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 17. Add a "dead-end road" sign at the cul-de-sac. 18. On the plat, show all existing and proposed street names. 19. Add City Detail Plate Nos. 1001, 1002, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1009, 2001, 2101, 2109, 2110, 2201, 2204, 3101, 3102, 3104, 3106, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5200, 5203, 5204, 5206, 5214, 5215, 5216, 5217, 5221, 5232, 5234, 5240, 5241, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A and 5313. 20. Show the street lights and a stop sign on the plans. 21. Submit public utility plans and profile for staff review. 22. City Forester's Conditions: a. A minimum of two overstory trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. b. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. c. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. d. Tree preservation on site shall be according to tree preservation plans dated 10/14/05. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 23. In the absence of parkland dedication, it is recommended that Stonefield pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final platting. At today's rate, these fees would total $120,000 (30 lots x $4,000). Additionally, the applicant is required to construct the neighborhood asphalt trail connector to the property line as depicted on their preliminary plan submittals. 24. Water Resource Coordinator's Conditions: a. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetland D. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. b. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 45-37 December 6, 2005 Page 17 c. The applicant shall work with the City's consultant to accommodate regional and site- specific storm water needs. d. The approximate location and extent of drain tile shall be shown on the plans. The applicant shall provide details as to whether the tile line will be removed, abandoned in place or remain. If the tile is to remain, the flow from the tile shall be accommodated in the design of the storm water management plan. e. The applicant shall provide rate control and storm water treatment to reduce off-site impacts. To provide a low -gradient means for controlling rate and volume, the applicant shall consider cooperating with the City to construct a wetland in the rear portions of any number of Lots 1-8, Block 3. In the event that the applicant is interested in pursuing wetland construction for banking purposes, this planning shall be integrated with the City's consultant's storm water infrastructure planning. f. Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) shall be provided over all existing wetlands, storm water infrastructure and storm water ponds. g• Lots 8 12,13jeek 3 shall be eastain graded to rainimize wipesed soils and faa*imize tree preset=�,etion. The developer asserts that, due to the steep grade in the southern portion of the property, custom grading would not save any additional trees. In addition, the developer maintains that the slope of the road and the location of the retaining wall make custom grading lots impractical. If the developer demonstrates to the satisfaction of staff that custom grading for their typical house pad would not result in additional significant tree preservation, mass grading of this area may be approved. In. The existing outlet structure of Pond A shall be removed and replaced in accordance with the City's standard detail. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) shall be provided for the pond. i. The portion of the silt fence that runs from the pipeline easement through Lot 7, Block 3 shall be moved upslope to the west by 30 to 60 feet to more clearly define the grading limits. The area of property between the silt fence and the gully and property line shall be seeded and mulched to control weeds and get a desirable cover crop in areas that were recently farmed. j. A temporary basin shall be constructed in the vicinity of Lots 6 and 7, Block 3. The temporary sediment basin shall be installed prior to disturbing upslope area. A temporary perforated riser and stable emergency overflow (EOF) for the basin shall be installed; details shall be included in the plan. The basin shall be properly sized for the watershed area, according to NPDES requirements (i.e. The basins must provide storage below the outlet pipe for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2 -year, 24-hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shall the basin provide less than 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe from each acre drained to the basin). Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 18 k. Chanhassen Type 2 silt fence shall be provided for the perimeter of the site up to Lot 10, Block 3. From there, Type 1 maybe used. Silt fence shall be shown on the plans around Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. 1. Curbside inlet controls are needed; Wimco type or ESS type (or approved similar protection) inlet controls shall be used. Curbside inlet protection shall be provided for existing inlets adjacent to the site exit on Osprey Lane. City standard inlet protection details 5302 and 5302A shall be included in the plans. The proposed rear yard catch basin protection shall be revised; Wimco type, ESS type or equal must be used. The proposed silt fence shall be installed with additional rock around Chanhassen type 1 silt fence. m. The plans shall be revised to show energy dissipation for the flared end section on Lot 7, Block 3. n. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slone Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. o. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. p. In order to fund the maintenance and expansion of the BC -P4.10 storm water pond and construction of additional capacity, the costs will be allocated among the benefiting properties. The total cost of materials and construction will be divided by the number of acres in the resulting subwatershed. The City will be responsible for the acres contributing from land already developed, park land and land to be developed in the future (e.g., the Bongard parcel). The developer will be responsible for the acres contributing from their development. If, for any reason, the regional storm water facility is not constructed, the developer will be responsible for providing storm water quality and quantity management on the subject property and paying Surface Water Management connection charges in accordance with City Code. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $65,364. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 19 q. In conjunction with the BC -P4.10 storm water ponding project, land in addition to the land shown in Outlot A may be required. At this time, the estimated amount of land is approximately 0.5 acres. The developer and the City will seek to agree upon the terms of the use of land for ponding should additional land be required. The developer, if required, shall provide additional land for ponding. 25. Fire Marshall Conditions: a. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be either removed from site or chipped. b. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. c. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. d. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. e. Fire hydrant spacing is acceptable. f. Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 26. Building Official Conditions: a. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. b. Demolition permits must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site. c. The developer must submit a list of proposed street names for review and approval prior to final plat of the property. Stonefield Addition Planning Case No. 05-37 December 6, 2005 Page 20 d. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. e. Separate sewer and water services must be provided each lot. f. Existing wells and on-site sewage treatment systems on the site must be abandoned in accordance with State Law and City Code. 27. The retaining walls shall be maintained by a Homeowners Association. 28. The City shall not be responsible for maintenance of storm water infrastructure on Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block K' ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Affidavit of Mailing and Public Hearing Notice. 4. Potential footprints for houses to be built within the Stonefield Subdivision 5. Letter from the developer extending the deadline to complete this application to 120 days. 6. Preliminary plat dated "Received November 18, 2005". &: planX2005 planning cases\JD5-37 stonefield (goers pmperty)\sMff repolUm 02005 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 IAC ^A Ar /Il I I / °�� / 0 3p �- 1,c v DIY nIL-L / CO ^ 1ry// \ 779'90 VY/L_..: lr rl L/Lll lrllllVl \ \ ti.tX I g WX \ Lo 7o �. \ W 00 k Qao /1 o I I J I 73,2 S00°07' 6"WOso OUTLOT A1 13 d o I 1( O 17.92 55.56 56.98 38 C 90 3 ; 34 \ 98. I IgQ '� _`' I 7' \�F�O - - - - - 42,238 sf I'Q, r of to T I _ _ _ _ _ _ EXISTING \ y) p t 1 DRAINAGE AND U77LITY I W 2 C I / l r U N WETLAND (TYP� I EASEMENT OVER ALL I � W � I I / / 1 \ w \i cN S01041'12"W \ f � (� J / OF OUTLOT A Q a m I / / / / I I I cn �'- 44.79 13s.o01 4 I I 35,86 sf I I I I II II \ / II \\ \ \® 70 Z---�• I \07 A s /� I I \ N W W oi% �. ` 79 • ° / \ g 25 I h / / 2 / / I I I 1 I I I I \' -. i' I\ -SPO �►� �� / „ / ,, h1 �I I / h / 5 NI I J I \ �Nh �o� ? 9 / 7 25, 931 sf l I I I I ^ 15:24 03 ¢_W \ �'\ 10 I �/ vl I til I m % h � ^ e c° J / 2,, 10 18,937 sf o I l l q O v 25,506 sf w o I / \ y \ N I / / '� / v ^ I I cn I I I I 25, 700 sf �/ N / 25, 348 sf �• - Ty F A 0 /PROPOSED WE \ \ p� I �/ Zi 26,253 sf I I �1 I \ N� o / J` v o N k0� \ I I I / / rn v,1 I 11 \^ e I \ m q%vq k / l 23,568 sf N1 1 23,995 sf �1 I ore n<i c h �X 19,952 sf I / I I I I I I I -- I -- --- n 9 �j 3 / / I I I I off' N� k1 �`lg BUFFER (T1P.) / / I I I I i �. 4fFti k 1 21,983 sf t' - h k/ \y� t<i J / \ \ 23 I o� 9528 PROPOSED 40' WETLAND o 95• BUFFER SETBACK (TYP. � •/ ) t' \\ \ °4911 -�a'. �a=s_03s2" / l ga / l I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 / l/\ 10 90°° 101o\0�g502 OU. )F2 J l °p / l I I 1 I I I I I so.00 _ l T/ \ 1'19 .. a 28.,4 L I I W I I 90.00 p=1°53'23" I I / \ 34,207 sf / I \ 15,123 sf o, \ = I I 90.00 I I / \ \ 9 2.- \ X12 ZA ....:...., 9 . �3? 99_54 cn 7.36-=-\ L - -2 �1� \ \ �� o 0o J n( I I I J L - - - - - T7e. , " J / / / 2'0 q d� 08 81.65 �" / 3 8X159_' - J L - n=9°07'33" O2w 8 9 5 \ L----- - 1 \ � �.....:..; . 90.79 .00 ° _ / , I BS7\�\ nl 275.19 I >. 10 / 19$89 R=600.00 0 1 1m - 1 505 3?Q <\,\ / /moi 2$ Mµn.1� 11!! lm \ i 0'1/ 33 i�/ -�--- , r�� _ g=18 59'33" _ Rg \'\ / / �Uo 15,200 sf > ,24°a9 I s000 I \ 8 / / \ i h tLai \ 773 - / � � \ 51.33 _, 4'� .. s o / / \ V) c! - 228 I "I" � I 3� - - , �, _ 90.00 r - 46.57'=�� '\s, \ �n y � 0251 ,DAr� i I 10` �� I I I / l ga ��-?B.Sg-� 23,3 sf��\ O S00°06'14W ;150.56 \ \ D, 13 '01 , °01 / 'I I ao I a,,° _ 43.87 \ g'J / 11 10 I / l 1028^ -I T 4= 80 .90 - � 4°4_06 - -� r I 1 I 95.32 \ \ v / \ O b I - 48'43" D=4 00'25" \\ W II so 00 I I so.00 \ \ �o �� \\ ? w W 00 101 9 92• i� 70 I // // I 1 1 1 I I 99.72- cp 15,264 sf o\\. \+ / //^\ �° I h ' - - \\ 125 po / \ \ N 3 N I I �/ / / / 7 I I 11 11 w\ \ _ _ _ 827. 0 31 \ \ au o '14"E 220.00 o D ✓ ' \ \ d �\ 21,205 �f I 213, 9 sf N/ / 5 / ° 76,924 sf I I 1 I 1 I 7 10 -I I 175• 208.11 N / \ l•-'"`/ 1 / 18, 727 sf / 6 i -- 202.51: I. -001 n .1 \ \ u - - ° N \ \ _ - - - - - 1 'O 10,608 sf \ 202.51 :- o v D� \ L 0 I 18, 180 sf 1010 v o 1 3 -� I , \�� o '\ ?\\ \ 15,616 sf\101 �� I ^ I / / / / ___J.......L----- \ D 17,754 sf N I 1 1 ah �1 1 �2 PERMANENT ' \ L _ _ J..L _ _ _ _ _ _ �..L.- - - - I l 1 45 sf o h W \ 17,596 sf / oC4 - �_ m 4 16,450 sf m 16,498 sf m m 72 I o o^ I v 'a DRAINAGE AND o\ �• ' . I I ¢i I I I _ N / 0 16, 324 sf c'•' o \ i 1 ro -� '� v �' W 3 3 U71L/TY EASELIENT �� \ a \ ro I I °� i rn o +I +. rn I °' W W m \� �` w \ i I O ^ `--DRAINAGE AND -- -0- �' o, ? co- (/1 PER DOC. N9. �v a \ 15, 104 sf \ I o o ° \ /I 169284. \a' o \ \ i I I LO h 'o UTILITY EASEMENT \\ 2 of I� \ (( I LI_ __^__ \ _ L 239.08 - 14 - - X714.00 1.05 60.03 1 80.92 92.65 / 111.30 109.74 1 \\ 100.33 1 90.38 1 / 90.38 / 80.16 1 J 137.02 - - - J M L L 163.72 ,-48.57 -. S00 °07'32" 300.58 _ _ - - - - o ' 7 " 144 75 725.53 S00 °07'32 "W 1251.67 _ w. L/NE OF THE / \ 20.00 �- - - t' $07° 421 E SW. COR. NW. � SW. 1/4 OF THE - TEMPORARY ROAD R=330.00 114 SEC. 2 J W. EASEMENT / NW. 1/4 SEC. 23 1 1,6=3028'19" Property TEMPORARY Chd. 8rg.=N80°33'39 CUL-DE-SA C WITH 90.0' DIAMETER r r r-n I A n r n � That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section A I \ \ I r7,-_, vr-1I vL,/ r7l L1I �i,r- 1 lL7\7L I Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the following described line and its northerly and southerly extensions; Commencing at the Southeast comer of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 04 minutes 49 seconds West, bearing assumed, along the South line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 790.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described,- thence North 1 degree 57 /�/ minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of 460.00 feet; thence North 18 degrees 32 Deve%pment Date Typical Lot' (Varies) minutes 33 seconds East, a distance of 330.00 feet; thence North 52 degrees 00 �� NOTE: V) minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 638.57 feet; thence North 1 degree 57 h owsares Development, PlDlment Inc. The lot dimensions and areas on this plan minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of 150.59 feet to a point on the North line of sold Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter distant 156.07 feet Easterly of Nathan Franzen are approximate. Refer to the Final Plat and a Tota/ Site Area 17.63.* ac. Zoning Standards (Minimums) 1851 Lake Drive West supporting data for exact lot dimensions an the Northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter as pp 9 measured aloe said North line and there terminatio Suite 550 areas. N Existing Zoning Rural - Lot Width ® Setback 90 ft. (100 ft. on Private Rd.) Street 9 9 Chanhassen, MN. 55317 Cu al Proposed Zoning RSF - Lot Depth 125 ft. AND Phone: (952) 361-0832 Ln Proposed Land Use Low Density, Residential - Lot Area 15,000 sq. ft. �_ _ _ 9_0 N That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Fax: (952) 361-0833 Street Dedication 2.231 ac. _ M Contacts: Nathan Franzen N Average Lot Area 21,741E sq.ft. 5r- o o Township 116, Range 23, described as follows, to-wit: The north 375.00 feet lying Westerly of the following described line, to-wit: Beginning at a point in the North 11 i Total Proposed Lots 30 - Front Yard Setback 30 ft. - 5 Drainage & line of said Southwest Quarter of Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) distant 90.00 Utility Easement 849.31 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof, • thence Southwesterly deflecting Overall Site Denalty (Gross) 1.701 /otS�aC. -Side Yard Setback 10 ft. 1 t 64 degrees 42 minutes 04 seconds from West to South from sold North line, a PL4AAE/e�v+Jr�V�/�r� distance of 16319 feet; thence Southerly deflecting to the left 32 degrees 35 �� Street dimensions listed reference bock of curb. - Rear Yard Setback 30 ft. I Setback Line minutes 37 seconds a distance of 125.62 feet; thence Southwesterly deflecting to Westwood Professional Services, Inc. a - Wetland Buffer 16.5 ft. Dimension (See Development Data) the right 22 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds a distance of 302.23 feet; thence 7599 Anagram Drive All streets to have curb and gutter as per City standards. at Setback Southerly to the northwest corner of the East 290.75 feet of the West 484.2 feet Eden Prairie, MN. 55344 - Structure Setback from Buffer 40 ft. I of the South 539.7 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW Phone: (952) 937-5150 I 10 IN Lot Dimension Drainage and utility easements shall be provided as required - ROW Width 60 ft. 1/4 of NW 1/4) as measured along the West and East lines of said Southwest Fax: (952) 937-5822 by the City. 15,0001 S.F. Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4); thence South parallel with Contact: Curtis Neff U-) - Road Width 31 ft. Back-to-Back Lot Number the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter to the South line CD I I of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) and there Cd I terminating, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Q 1PJ i Approx. Lot Area County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota. 3 I5 0' I AND 60' 120' 180' a i 51 0 o Setback NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION L - n - - - - - - - "- - Dimension Outlot A, Shenandoah Ridge, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in o o L-2 2005114PPFOI.DWG o gD the office of the County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota. 0 N (No scale) Abstract. Date 10/14/05 sheet 3 oP 11 . W/fllwom Prof"donal SWAM, by- I hereby cavy tLrt ems plan w.e prepued by nu w under my Prepil for 7699 Anagram Drive dbe ' md ther I = a �y 6®rd LAND 1�aV Stonef field Eden Prairie, MN SS344 •mer � Is" of dw BIW Of MinnNOWL 10/20/05 Rev5 LOTised Per City Comments (CRN) SNE -` ,�2aJ3731 \ 12/15/05 LOT CONFIGURATIONNFIGURAMON/ STREET LAYOUT � � Plowshares Development, Ince Piet �' TOLL FREE l-eee-937-5150 aaig W. Morse 1851 Lake Drive Well Suite 550 vjwhvow wormwattwoodp.00m Data 14/15/05 Licaae No. 23021 ltemed Daawlaa b./saes , Minnesota 55317 C118n118S6e21, M1nILeBOt8 10/16/2005 TUB 12:15 PAX 952 937 5622 Westwood Prof. Ser. u,�vc iwcc � R6057'tf d q o C-0 June 11, 2005 Brent Hislop, 11 pages including cover ®001/011 Yiitt FSl Per our conversation of yesterday I am sending you the following; ♦ A temporary easement (5.pages) when I granted the city an easement to use part of my land for a ponding area. ♦ A permanent easement (3 pages) where 1 gave the city easement to put Osprey land across my property ♦ A totter from Dave Hempel regarding lot sizes, road widths and the outlot deeded to toe. ♦ A sketch from Dave, showing the same, At the time of the negotiations, the above were all packaged together and were contingent on each other. 'Though I don't have recorded copies, I trust they were recorded, If not, I have sufficient information to show there was fraudulent intent — as the agreement all along is very clear and spelled out on a number of documents, Call if questions. Bill Goers :� 10/18/2005 TUE 12:16 PAX 952 937 5822 Westwood Prof. Ser. 2002/011 ..��n •ci uac u hIAUL 02 CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCO__ a FUCHS, P.A Mar 7',94 16:27 No.007 P.03 TRIS AGRSZXM made this _ day of , 1994, by and between WILLIAM J. GOERS sad VICXY L. GOERS, husband and wife, hereinafter referred to as "Grantors", and the CITY 07 CRARRABSIN, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as "City"). RITMEOBETRI The Grantors, in consideration of one Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration to them in hand paid by the City, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, do hereby grant unto the City, its successors and assigns, a temporary easement for public storm water ponding purposes, over, on, across, under, and through the land situated in the County of Carver, State of Minnesota, an legally doscribed on the attached Exhibit "A". TO RAVE AND TO BOLD the same, unto the City, its successors and assigns, commencing upon execution of this agreement and terminating at such time permanent storm water ponding easements are defined and conveyed to the City as provided herein. The temporary easement granted herein shall also include the right of ingress to and egress from the temporary easement premises, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, repairing, and maintaining the property of the City, at the will of the City, its successors and assigns; it being the intention of the parties hereto that the Grantors hereby grant the uses herein specified without divesting themselves of the right to use and enjoy the mWM m W1.. 6r r LO/16/2005 TUE 12:16 FAX 952 937 5822 Westwood Prof. Ser. CAMPBELL, KNU?SON. SCO-- & FUCHS, P.A v Mar 12003/011 rHvc n.1 94 16:28 No.007 P.04 above described temporary easement premises, subject only to the right of the City to use the same for the purposes herein expressed. It is understood by the Grantors that once permanent storm water ponding easements have been defined and conveyed to the City which serve to accommodate storm water runoff from the proposed Shenandoah Ridge plat, a certified copy of a City resolution terminating the above described temporary easement, appropriately filed of record, shall be conclusive evidence of the termination of this temporary easement. It is further understood by the Grantors that the City shall not be responsible for any restoration costs, replacement coats, or damages resulting from the construction or abandonment of the easement premises. It in further understood that vegetation may be removed and that excavation may occur on the easement premises. The City will perform maintenance as needed to the easement premises to maintain the function or the temporary storm water pond until this easement is terminated. The City will be responsible for restoring all disturbed areas resulting from @aid maintenance activities with geed. The above named Grantors, for themselves, their successors, heirs, and assigns do covenant with the City, its successors and assigns, that they are well seized in fee title of the above described temporary easement promisee and that they have the sole right to grant and convey this temporary easement to the City. IN T88TIX0XY WHUSCY, the Grantors hereto have signed this agreement the day and year first above written. 17436 'W AIM 2 cNYI Ml1.Moo..+ IP'/ MM OOUf iWY.iwai 10/18/2005 TUE 12:17 FAX 952 937 5822 Westwood Prof. Ser. CAMPBELL. KNUTSON. SCO- 8 FUCHS. P.A t v Mar STATE OF MINNESOTA as. COUNTY OF .5ev# GRANT0it9 0004/011 rAut U4 94 16:29 No.007 P.05 WILLIAM J. VICKV L. GOERS ^- CITY OP CRAWRANSBN BY, AND Donald J. C m al, Mayor on As worth, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this .a1 day of 4 -.l1 , 1994, by William J. Goers and Vicky L. Goers, husban and d wits. JOYCE L KASVEOCTANT PMVN port COWN" w oowI"M cirraa ► ►r6 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( Be. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1994, by Donald J. Chmiel and by Don As wor h, the Mayor and y Manager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY; Carpbsll, Knutson, Scott i Fuohs, D.A. 1380 Corporate Center Curve, Suite 0317 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 (617) 452-5000 1243/ a 4.a, ., ewN. NfrwDsu. gym, 10/18/2005 TUB 12:17 PAX 952 937 5822 Westwood Prof. Ser. 128I8IS' "A" 2005/011 . .. ..... .rte_.. oo Te=Qrarry Storm Meter Ponding Easeuent: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the centerline of Osprey Lane as dedicated in the plat of LAKE SUSAN HILLS WEST 9TH ADDITION, on file in said Carver County, and the southwest line of said LAKE SUSAN HILLS WEST STH ADDITION; thence South 500 351 36' West, along the southwest extension of said centerline, a distance of 25.00 feet to the point of begin- ning; thence South 390 24' 24" East, a distance of 210.00 feat; thence South 500 351 36" West, a distance of 180.00 feet; thence North 390 24' 24" West, a distance of 210.00 feet; thence North 504 35' 36" East, a distance of 180.00 feet to the point of beginning. 12436 : ov.w i... Goin •anr.iu r' 10/18/2005 TUE 12:17 FAX 952 937 5822 Westwood Prof. Ser. �iw¢iuca or o ie•a L '02'33"E 13.09 2 G EASEMENT EXHIBIT ®006/011 I'Abh. Ub Cir ♦ l"_••" a - _ 1 Y' - Sovth ' line of SW 1/4 of Sac. 14 -NarlA {line of N/✓14 of see. 2! p _- _ •1 vw Diriw �� ..9� ; •i of / (•apflr//nC of r'� �' 4 a ( A � i .' 9M A y�� iIYyI41(L �nL O%L.v�SiI A IAN; \ US &W7r en+ Ao01"GOV r 1 f� a \ ca4 -- RvmO EA3EME/VT 'tir n �1 1 � B/L( OMMS PROPEk7'y anis /!ne n/ NVR# ofNv%k. !nb Ib, : dE4I 0 Hoolf/PM' MIA Sulo: I".Ie' Dxt•� !/ii/f! 10/18/2005 TUE 12:18 FAX 952 937 5822 Westwood Prof. Ser. 0007/011 _.....__... __....—. GAM 07 PER7lufEN2 EasEDlIIt7T WILLIAM J. OOEAs and vzcxy L. OOE'As, husband and wife, hereinafter referred to as "Grantors", in consideration of one Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, do hereby grant unto the CITY OF CRAMBORN, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the state of Minnesota, the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City", its successors and assigns, forever, a permanent easement for public street, drainage, and utility purposes over, across, on, under, and through land situated within the County of Carver, State of Minnesota, as described on the attached Exhibit "A". INCLUr)TNG the rights of the City, its contractors,. agents, servants, and assigns, to enter upon the easement premises at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair, and maintain said public street, drainage, and utility systems over, across, on, under, and through the easement premises, together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain, pave, and excavate the easement premises, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth, and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said public street, drainage, and utility systems. The above named Grantors, for themselves, their successors, heirs, and assigns do covenant with the City, its successors and assigns, that they are well seized in fee title of the above 12059 cw�. wont 01,141" n" ADIM i . 1. m 10/18/2005 TUE 12:18 FAX 952 937 5822 Westwood Prof. Ser. IUKt by 2008/011 PAGE 66 described easement premises and that they have the sole right to grant and convey the easement to the City. IN TESTIXONY WIRRIOF, the Grantors hereto have signed this agreement this Zl!,+ day of A 1� � , 1994. T ORMITORA t WILLIAM J. GOERS Lin VICKY W. GOERS STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )es. COUNTY OF 5-k-tt- The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this .21°Y day of, 1994; by William J. Goers and Vicky L. Goers, husban and wife. DRAFTED BY: Campbell, Knutson, Scott & Fuchs, P.A. 1380 Corporate Center Curve, Suite 0317 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 (612) 452-5000 12459 CH,vcaa.H m .Mf Qw4m 2 '...Wfm nw.4 ..1d JOYCE 1 Eii L AIF MrX MDT eoorr ooumr 0 NOTARY PUBLIC WE QCmIaLm m ►1M DRAFTED BY: Campbell, Knutson, Scott & Fuchs, P.A. 1380 Corporate Center Curve, Suite 0317 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 (612) 452-5000 12459 CH,vcaa.H m .Mf Qw4m 2 '...Wfm nw.4 ..1d . Ser. 0009/011 UYUTAGIumC nr PaGE 09 That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter Of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23 Nest, Carver County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the following described line and its northerly and southerly extensions: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence south 89e 04' 49" West, bearing assumed, along the south line Of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 790.00 fest to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North Ole 57' 27" West a distance of 460.00 feet; thence North 18. 32' 33" East a distance of 330.00 feet; thence North 52e DO' 00" West a distance of 638.57 feet; thence North Ole 57' 27" West l distance o1 150.59 feet to a point on the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter distant 156.07 feet es■terly of the northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter as measured along maid north line end there terminating. That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, Carver county, Minnesota, which lies within a strip of land 50.00 feet in width, the centerline i■ described an fcllowu Beginning at the point of Intersection of the centerline of Osprey Lane as dedicated in the plat of LME SUSAN HILLS WEST 8TH ADDITION, on file in Said Carver County and the southwest line of maid LAXI SUSAN HILLS NEST 8TH ADDITION; thence South 501 35. 36" Nest, along the southwest extension of said centerline, a distance of 72.93 feet and there terminating. Also that part of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, which lies within a strip of land 60.00 feet in width, the centarline is described as follows: Beginning at the point Of termination of the above described strip of land; thence southwest a distance of 130.91 foot along a curve concave to the northwest, tangent to the above described centerline, a central angle of 250 00. 04", and a radius of 300.00 feet to the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and there terminating. Said stripe of land are to extend by their lull width from said southwest line of LAKE SUSAN HILLS WEST 8Ta ADDITION to said West line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter. That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Seotion 23, Town.hip 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, which lies within a strip of land 20.00 feat in width, the centerline of which Is described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the said Northwest Quarter; thence North 89. 25. 16" East, along the North line of said Northwest Quarter, a distance of 71.06 feet to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence south 51 29' 34" East a distance o1 220.00 feet and there terminating. 1259 c".rwwrw.,, .w, ovlem n.woow raw, w..el 10/18/2005 TUE 12:19 FAX 952 937 5822 Westwood Prof. Ser. UYUNtIUKt CF' March 29, 1994 CITY of CHANHASSEN 2010/011 PAGE 10 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1000 6 FAX (61 2) 937-5739 Mr. and Mrs. William Goers 1601 Lyman Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Lots Sizes - Sbenandoah Ridge Project No. 93.20 Phar Mr, and Mrs. Coors: This letter is a follow-up to my telephone conversation wi minimum lot sizes which are applicable to his property if lk current zoning regulations. Mr. Ooers on Friday, March 25, 1994 regarding the hould subdivide into single-family lots under today's In conjunction with the subdivision of Shenandoah Rirl%4thn xrpal your property to connect to Lake Susan Hills West 89VAdditiA. acquisition, it is my understanding that the developer Shenandii to give you sufficient frontage on Osprey Lane for oft 90 -foot wi for a 60400t wide street to be extended south [YU spicy Lane, it will bo necessary Cllr lbe develupel lu wuvcy.Nproximately 15 the necessary front footage to comply with tbtint zoning rept future street extension. It appears, based on It Construction draw enough to subdivide to meet the current yd�lstions of two (, 90 I hope this letter addresses your free to contact me. Sincerely, CITY OF ,- David C. Hempel Assistant City Engineer DCH:ktm n.Trey Lane is proposed to be extended throuah As a part of the negotiations for the casement h Ridge will convey a portion of his subdivision single-family lots and sufficient rightof-way used on the construction drawings, it appears i4t of frontage along Osprey Lane to give you lidons and still have enough right-of-way for a in�` the lot lying north of Osprey Lane is large f ,o 3vidc lots for a single-family development, regarding subdividing your par"I. If you have any questions, please feel c: Charles Folch, City Engineer Kate Aanenson, Planning director 10/18/2005 TUE 12:19 FAX 952 937 5822 Westwood Prof. Ser. 0011/011 12 Q LOT SPLIT DATA 8x / IAINACE I iecvcur— W 11 AIr"I Southline of SW 1/4 of Sec, 14 w r x4s `7 I1:7 4-p oze, ix, � jtv, . Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Web Site: http//www.rileypurgatorybluffcreek.org December 7, 2005 Mr. Nathan Franzen Plowshares Development LLC 1851 Lake Drive West, #550 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Permit #2005-35: Stonefield: Chanhassen Dear Mr. Franzen: Legal Advisor: Krebsbach & Haik 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4320 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612 333-7400 Fax: 612 333-6959 Engineering Advisor: Bart Engineering 4700 West 77th Street Minneapolis, MN 55435 952 832-2600 Fax: 952 832-2601 The Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District received your land grading and alteration plans and signed permit application on October 25, 2005. The District is required to approve, deny, or extend your permit within 60 days of receipt of the completed application. The District has reviewed the permit and determined that the application is incomplete. The District requires the following information to complete your application: The project must receive Planning Commission and City Council approval prior to the District taking action on the permit application. The District cannot act on the permit until your application is complete. Your application will be considered complete and formally received, upon receipt of the information required by the District's Engineering Advisor. The application will be presented to the Board of Managers at their regularly scheduled meeting on the first Wednesday of each month. The District will act accordingly within 60 days of the completed application. If you have any questions about the required information, please call the District's Engineer, Robert Obermeyer, at 952-832-2857. Sincerely, bert C. Obermeyer / ' c: Paul Haik Howard Peterson Lori Haak Curt Neft ::0DMIANPCD0CS%D0CS VA65 88\1 Board of Managers Howard Peterson Mark Dillon Conrad Fiskness Philip Wright Erin Ahola Page 1 of 3 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Nathan Franzen [nathan.franzen@plowsharesdevelopment.com] Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 5:29 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Cc: 'Curtis Neft' Subject: Stonefield Comments Sharmeen, Below are the comments from our engineer (and few from myself) on Stonefield that I would like to go over prior to the PC meeting. I will have Curt send in an official letter from Westwood so that the City can respond line by line so that we are in agreement for the PC meeting on Tuesday. N From: Curtis Neft[mailto:curtis.neft@westwoodps.com] Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 9:26 AM To: Nathan Franzen Subject: RE: Chanhassen Meeting - FRIDAY Here are my comments on the list of conditions: 1. No Comments 2. No Comments 3. No Comments 4. No Comments 5. No Comments 6. No Comments 7. No Comments 8. Should be revised to "On the final utility plans:" e. The existing storm sewer may be undersized and could be installed in the center of the easement or on the lot line which would increase the buildable area of the lots, or the existing easement can be vacated and plated over the existing pipe alignment (this will result in decreasing the buildable area of lot 1 which is already a concern). My experience tells me that the 12" existing pipe will not be acceptable once we add a rear yard catchbasin. k. I am not clear on what this comments is. I would like verbal clarification from staff. 9. Should be revised to "On the final grading plans:" 10. No Comments 11. Please amend the last sentence to: "Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees will be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit." 12/5/2005 Page 2 of 3 12. No Comments 13. We will have to work with adjacent homeowners and acquire temporary construction easements and do some replanting. 14. No Comments 15. It should be added that any future developments served by the lift station will be responsible for reimbursement to Plowshares Development, Inc. for their portion of SAC units serviced by the liftstation. Plowshares is not asking for any upfront credit, but an agreement should be in place for future reimbursement if and when future development needs service from the liftstation. 16. No Comments 17. Typically the city has required a sign stated that road will be connected in the future. 18. No Comments 19. Has the city revised any details plates from the Pinehurst Development? 20. No Comments 21. Reference to final plans should be made so it does not look like we have made an incomplete submittal for preliminary plat. 22. No Comments 23. No Comments 24. d. The existing draintile is not on any record and field efforts to determine the location of the draintile have not been successful. I believe this draintile will more than likely be removed with the construction of the City's ponding plan. I recommend the location of the tile be addressed with a construction note stating that the tile shall be field verified and or removed during construction. g. It is not practical to have custom graded lots for several reasons. A retaining wall is proposed along the tree removal limit. This wall defines the removal of the trees and any attempts for a custom grading will only increase construction costs and the potential for drainage issues and no additional trees will be saved. Cross sections of these lots can be provided to further support and collaborate this point. Custom grading only works when the grading required to build the homes is minimal. h. We anticipate incorporating the design of the ponding improvements by the City's consultant into our construction plans and building the proposed ponding system with our development. Plowshares Development and Westwood agree that the costs of the improvements should be prorated based on drainage area and Plowshares Development should receive credit from the city accordingly for all storm water related infrastructure improvements. i. I disagree with this comment because the silt fence should be extended beyond the grading limit to provide silt containment during landscaping and home building. The majority of the site is bean field and will need to be sodded and landscaped. The silt fence should be placed at the limit of the landscaping as to avoid removing and replacing silt fence during each phase of construction. k. It will be difficult to install silt fence and do the necessary grading and landscaping work for the lots 1 and 2, block 1 because the surrounding area is up gradient from the construction area. I propose we install tree protection fence and perimeter staking. A temporary grading easement will be acquired from the adjacent home owner to the east for grading and landscaping work. A temporary inlet with sediment control would be more 12/5/2005 Page 3 of 3 appropriate and effective than silt fence for this area. p. The fees need to be recalculated for the new net area. 25. g. The 90' diameter cul-de-sac is currently shown on the plan. What details need to be submitted for review and approval? 26. b. This should be removed as a condition because no structures are present on the project. f. Existing wells and sewage treatment systems are not present on the project, so this note should be removed as a condition. 27. No Comments Let me know if you need to add to or have any questions. Nathan Franzen Plowshares Development 1851 Lake Drive W, Suite 550 Chanhassen, MN 55317 952-361-0832 (Office) 952-361-0833 (Fax) 612-270-2020 (Mobile) wwwTplowsharesdeveloi)ment.com 12/5/2005 Page I of 1 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Nathan Franzen [nathan.franzen@plowsharesdevelopment.com] Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 9:37 AM To: 'Nathan Franzen'; Haak, Lori Cc: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen; 'Curtis Neff Subject: RE: Stonefield Attachments: Revised Outlot.pdf ]Lori, I forgot to attach the draft plat for the area needed for the City pond. Please see the attached. 101 From: Nathan Franzen [mailto:nathan.franzen@plowsharesdevelopment.com] Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 4:42 PM To: 'Ihaak@ci.chanhassen.mn.us' Cc: (saljaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us); 'Curtis Neft'; 'Todd M. Simning' Subject: Stonefield Lori, Per our discussion today, I have calculated the value of the land based upon what it would save us in park fees if we were to dedicate it for park We have estimated the amount of area that Charlie is asking for the City pond and believe it to be about .45 acres. If it ends up being less we can just adjust the credit using the formula. Park Fees = 30*3 =90/75 = 1.2 acres would be required for park dedication. .45/1.2 = 37% Park Fees: $6977*30 = $209,310. $209,310 *.37 = $77,444 W Nathan Franzen Plowshares Development 1851 Lake Drive W, Suite 550 Chanhassen, MN 55317 952-361-0832 (Office) 952-361-0833 (Fax) 612-270-2020 (Mobile) wwwTplowshgmsdevelopment.com 12/5/2005 December 5, 2005 Page 2 Agree 1� Have any of the city details been updated or revised since the Pinehurst Development? If so, please supply a copy and t4e equired fee to n Westwood Professional Services, Inc 0 � I 1 Agree Mb '"I 2'. We request the conditions be revised to make reference to final plans. 21- Agree 3 2 Agree d. The existing draintile is not any record with the city or county and field efforts to determine the location of the draintile have not been successful. I believe this file will more than likely be removed with the construction of the City's ponding plan. I recommend the location of the file be addressed with a construction note stating that the draintile shall be field verified and or removed during construction. g. It is not practical to have custom graded lots for several reasons. A retaining wall is proposed along the tree removal limit. This wall defines the removal of the trees and any attempts for custom grading will not save any additional trees. Custom grading works when the amount of grading required to build the streets and houses is minimal which is not the case with this development. h. We anticipate incorporating the design ofIffe ponding design by the City's consultant into our construction plans and building the proposed improvements with our development. Plowshares Development, Inc. anticipates credit and or reimbursement for a prorated portion of the infrastructure improvements based on contributing drainage area. We would request that some language be added to the conditions for approval indicating that Plowshares will only be responsible for their prorated share of the project. i. I disagree with this comment because the silt fence should be extended beyond the mass grading limit to provide erosion control during home building and landscaping. The majority of the site is currently bean field and will need to be sodded and landscaped. The silt fence should be placed at the limit of the landscaping to avoid removing and replacing silt fence during each phase of construction. k. It will be difficult to install silt fence and do the necessary grading and landscaping work for lots 1 and 2, block 1 because the surrounding area is up gradient from the proposed construction. I propose we install tree protection fence and perimeter staking. A temporary inlet with sediment control would be more effective than silt fence for this area. p. The fees should be recalculated based on the new net area. g. The 90' diameter cul-de-sac is currently shown on the plan. Please request in detail the additional information required for review and approval. �q0 agti W January 5, 2006 Kate Aanenson City of Chanhassen 6900 City Center Dr. P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Stonefield Dear Kate: W7�1^1 jd 966 Ref: 2005 -1114 -CO After review of the conditions for Preliminary Plat from the staff report for December 6, 2005, Plowshares Development, Inc. and Westwood Professional Services, Inc. have the following response comments: PRELIbIINARY PLAT 1. Agree 2. Agree 3. Agree 4. Agree 5. Agree 6. Agree 7. Agree 8. Agree, with clarification e. The existing storm sewer will be removed and replace in the center of the proposed easement centered between Lots 1 & 2, Block 1. The existing easement will be vacated at time of final plat. 9. Agree 10. Agree 11. Agree 12. Agree 13. Agree 14. Agree 15. Agree 16. Agree 17. The cul-de-sac is temporary and will be connected to Audubon road at a future date. Should a sign be posted stating the future connection to Audubon road in place of the "Dead-end road?" Also, should a "NO OUTLET" sign be placed at Osprey instead of a "DEAD END" sign at the cul-de-sac? 18. Agree 19. Have any of the city details been updated or revised since the Pinehurst Development? If so, please supply a copy and the required fee to Westwood Professional Services, Inc. January 5, 2006 Page 2 20. Agree 21. Agree 22. Agree 23. Agree 24. Agree, with the following clarification d. The existing draintile is not any record with the city or county and field efforts to determine the location of the draintile have not been successful. I believe this tile will more than likely be removed with the construction of the City's ponding plan. I recommend the location of the tile be addressed with a construction note stating that the draintile shall be field verified and or removed during construction. g. We have meet with engineering staff to further discuss the option of custom grading and all agreed that due to the steep grades custom grading would not be practical and additional trees would not be saved. In addition, having Plowshares Development perform the work during the development process will allow the retain wall maintenance to be placed within the overall Stonegate association. Thus, if any repairs would ever need to be made, the association would have collected funds versus leaving any repairs to an individual homeowner. h. We anticipate incorporating the ponding design by the City's consultant into our construction plans and building the proposed improvements with our development. Plowshares Development, Inc. anticipates 100% credit and or reimbursement for the improvements to the existing outlet structure. From our meeting on January 4, 2006, Lori Haak was going to be drafting language to that affect. We would also request language be added to the conditions for approval indicating that Plowshares will only be responsible for their prorated share of the storm water improvements based on contributing drainage area. i. I disagree with this comment because the silt fence should be extended beyond the mass grading limit to provide erosion control during home building and landscaping. The majority of the site is currently bean field and will need to be sodded and landscaped. The silt fence should be placed at the limit of the landscaping to avoid removing and replacing silt fence during each phase of construction. k. It will be difficult to install silt fence and do the necessary grading and landscaping work for lots 1 and 2, block 1 because the surrounding area is up gradient from the proposed construction. I propose we install tree protection fence and perimeter staking. A temporary inlet with sediment control would be more effective than silt fence for this area. CITY OF CIIANIIASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation. Phone. 952 227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone. 952 227,1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web she www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Sharmeen AL-Jaff, Senior Planner FROM: Mak Sweidan, Engineer DATE: November 30, 2005 SUBJ: Preliminary Plat Review of Stonefield Land Use Review File No. 05-11 Upon review of the plans submitted by Westwood, Inc., dated October 14, 2005, I offer the following comments and recommendations: GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL The site area is about 17.60 acres and has tree cover over approximately 4.69 acres (27%) of the parcel with a variety of grade changes. The site elevations range from a high of 970± to a low of 912±. These severe elevation differences make it challenging to both develop and minimize grading on this site. The plans propose to grade about 80% of the site for 30 new house pads, a proposed street and enlarging an existing stormwater pond. The proposed grading will prepare the site for full basement and walk -out type house pads. Retaining walls are proposed throughout the site due to the severe elevation differences and to create the house pads. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. Retaining walls within drainage and utility easements must be minimized, however, staff understands that this may not be feasible, therefore, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. The existing site drainage is encompassed within almost one drainage area. Under existing conditions, the site drains from the north and west sides to the east to an existing wetland along the southeast side of the property line. Under developed conditions, the applicant is proposing to capture all of the street drainage, all of the frontyard drainage, and some rearyard drainage from the interior lots. This stormwater will be conveyed via storm sewer to an existing pond in the northeast corner of the site for treatment. The existing stormwater pond was designed to treat much of the site drainage areas adjacent to the parcel from the north and northeast sides. Since the applicant is proposing to enlarge the existing stormwater pond to accommodate the additional drainage generated from the proposed site, the enlargement must be designed to City standards and coordinated and approved by the City's Water Resources Coordinator. The City of Chanhassen e A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gnat place to live, work, and play. Sharmeen Al-Jaff November 30, 2005 Page 2 Drainage calculations for the site have been submitted and some changes must be made. The applicant is required to meet the existing site peak runoff rates for the 10 -year and 100 -year, 24-hour storm events. Storm sewer sizing calculations with drainage map must be submitted at the time of final plat application. The storm sewer must be sized for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 - year flood level. Proposed erosion control must be developed in accordance with the WCA's best management practices. Staff recommends that Type II silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, to be used adjacent to the existing wetland, existing creek area, and around the pond. In addition, tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. Erosion control blankets are required for all 3:1 slopes with an elevation change of eight feet or more. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. The applicant should be aware that any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. UTILITIES Municipal water service is available to the site from Osprey Lane and sewer is available at the Bluebill Trail and Osprey Lane intersection. The water and sewer mains will be extended south from Osprey Lane to serve the site and stubbed at the southwest corner of the parcel for future extension to the west. Due to the topography of the site and the elevation of the existing sanitary sewer, the site can not be served by a gravity sanitary sewer system, therefore, a lift station is proposed between Lot 4, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 3. The lift station is not identified on the Trunk Sanitary Sewer System map, or in the capital improvement plan, therefore, the developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and installation of the lift station and force -main. The lift station and forcemain must meet the City's minimum requirements. The developer is responsible for any additional work required to install the lift station and foreemain, including, but not limited to dewatering costs, grading, subgrade correction and signal tests. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,955.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,525.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Upon Sharmeen Al-Jaff November 30, 2005 Page 3 completion and final acceptance of the utility improvements, the City will own and maintain these utilities. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. The developer must obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health and Carver County. Once the executed development contract, securities, fees and permits have been submitted, a preconstruction meeting must be held before grading and/or utility construction can begin. STREETS The plans show Osprey Lane within two right-of-ways, 50 -foot and 60 -foot wide. The plans propose one full access to the site off of Osprey Lane from the north. The proposed public street complies with the minimum required right-of-way and pavement width. A temporary 90 -ft diameter cul-de-sac turnaround for emergency vehicles is proposed at the southwest end of the proposed street and a "dead end road" sign will be required. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The applicant will be required to meet the existing site runoff rates for 10 -year and 100 -year, 24-hour storm events. The proposed enlargement of the existing stormwater pond must be designed to meet the City's minimum standards and coordinated and approved by the City Water Resources Coordinator. 2. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations and a full size drainage map must be submitted with the final plat for staff review and approval. 3. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood level. 4. Staff recommends that Type II silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, be used adjacent to the existing wetland, existing creek area, and around the proposed Sharmeen Al-Jaff November 30, 2005 Page 4 pond. In addition, tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. Erosion control blankets are recommended for all of the steep 3:1 slopes with an elevation change of eight feet or more. 5. All plans must be signed by a registered Civil Engineer in the State of Minnesota. 6. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health, Carver County and the Williams Pipe Line Company. 7. The developer must obtain a written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. 8. On the utility plan: a. Show all the proposed storm sewer pipe type, size and class. b. Show the sanitary sewer pipe slope and class. c. Show watermain pipe class (C900). d. Add a storm sewer schedule. e. Show the existing storm sewer between Lots 1 & 2, Block 1 within the center of the 20 -foot utility easement. f. Show the stormwater manholes rim and invert elevations. g. Add a note to remove the temporary pond outlet control structure. h. The last street accessible storm manhole discharging to the stormwater pond must be manhole with sump. i. Add a note: any connection to an existing structure must be core drilled. j. Extend the storm sewer further to the south along the proposed street. k. Remove lots 7 & 8 back -yard storm sewer and add a storm sewer along the property line between lots 4 & 5 and between lots 8 & 9 block 4. 9. On the grading plan: a. Show silt fence Type II adjacent to wetland, pond, creeks, etc. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Use class 5 storm sewer in the roadway; revise the note under general grading and drainage notes accordingly. d. Extend the swale between Lots 1 & 2, Block 4 further to the east. 10. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. In addition, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. Sharmeen Al-Jaff November 30, 2005 Page 5 11. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,955.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,525.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. 12. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 13. Any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. 14. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. 15. The developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and construction of the lift station and forcemain and any associated costs. 16. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 17. Add a "dead end road" sign at the cul-de-sac. 18. On the plat, show all existing and proposed street names. 19. Add City Detail Plate Nos. 1001, 1002, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1009, 2001, 2101, 2109, 2110, 2201, 2204, 3101, 3102, 3104, 3106, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5200, 5203, 5204, 5206, 5214, 5215, 5216, 5217, 5221, 5232, 5234, 5240, 5241, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A and 5313. 20. Show the street lights and a stop sign on the plans. 21. Submit public utility plans and profile for staff review. c: Paul Oehme, Public Works Director/City Engineer Alyson Moms, Assistant City Engineer g:\eng\projecu\stonefield\ppr.doc TRANSMITTAL W Westwood Date: November 18, 2005 To: Sharmin AI-Jaff City of Chanhassen 6900 City Center Dr. P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 From: Curt Neft Regarding: Stonefield Proj. No.: 20051114 -CO Items: No Description 16 FULL-SIZE PLANS 1 11X17 PLAN 1 8-1/2 X 11 PLAN Purpose: Other (see remarks) Remarks: Please find the attached preliminary submittal. Electronic copies of the plans in PDF and TIFF format will be forwarded to you via email. If you have any questions or need additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 952-906-7405 Thank you Westwood Aofessbr 7699 Anagram Drive Eden PURev. MN 55346 MAIN 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5822 TOLL FREE 1-888-937-5150 "Ali wP5®WfSN.COCpS.CIXE1 www.XvestwoodR.mm CIN OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED NOV 1 8 2005 CHANHASSEN PANNING DEPT Delivery: Mail Copy to: Nathan Franzen �CAMNm TWIN CITIESIMETRO ST. CLOUD BRAINEND 0 MEMORANDUM CITYOF TO: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner CHONSEN 7700 Market Boulevard FROM: Todd Hoffman, Park & Recreation Director PO Boz 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 DATE: October 27, 2005 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 SUBJ: Park & Trail Conditions of Approval; Stonefield Subdivision Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227,1180 I have reviewed the application by Plowshares Development for a proposed Fax 952227,1190 30 lot subdivision referred to as Stonefield. Staff is very familiar with this property as it borders Power Hill Park and is home to a drainageway that has Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 experienced significant erosion in recent years. Fax: 952.227.1170 this subdivision request. Finance PARKS Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 The property is situated directly west of and shares a common border with Power Hill park. This neighborhood park was developed in approximately 1990 Park 8 Recreation Phone: 952,227,1120 and features a large sliding hill, basketball court, playground, small park shelter Fax: 952.227.1110 and limited off-street parking. Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard A significant elevation change exists between the top of Power Hill Park and the Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.14N location proposed for the new homes in Stonefield. This will be a deterrent for P � some residents of the new subdivision as they attempt to visit the park. No Planning & additional parkland acquisition or dedication is recommended as a condition of Natural Resources this subdivision request. Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 TRAILS Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Many neighborhoods adjoining Power Hill Park gain access to the park from Fax: 952.227.1310 neighborhood trail connectors. The applicant has included such a connector in their submittal. The proposed location for the trail connector, within Outlot A, Senior 9 222711 Phone: 9522271125 is acceptable to staff. P Fax 952 227.1110 RECOMMENDED PARK AND TRAIL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us In the absence of parkland dedication, it is recommended that Stonefield pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final platting. At today's rate, these fees would total $120,000 (30 lots x $4,000). Additionally, the applicant be required to construct the neighborhood asphalt trail connector to the property line as depicted on their preliminary plan submittals. The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. MEMORANDUM TO: Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner FROM: Steven Torell, Building Official`3� DATE: November 2, 2005 SUBJ: Review of proposed subdivision: Stonefield Planning Case: 05-37 I have reviewed the plans for the above subdivision and have the following conditions and comments: 1. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. 2. Demolition permits must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site. 3. The developer must submit a list of proposed street names for review and approval prior to final plat of the property. 4. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. 5. Separate sewer and water services must be provided each lot. 6. Existing wells and on-site sewage treatment systems on the site must be abandoned in accordance with State Law and City Code. G/safety/st/memos/plan/Stonefield CITY OF MUSfi11 MEMORANDUM 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 TO: Sharmin Al-Jaff, Senior Planner Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 ne: 52.227.11 FROM: Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal Fax: 952.227.1110 must be either removed from site or chipped. Phone: 952.227.1130 DATE: October 25, 2005 Building Inspections 2, Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 SUBJ: Stonefield, request for re -zoning from agricultural estate 1591 Park Road district, A-2 to single family residential, RSF, subdivision Engineering review for 30 lots, one outlot and public right of way with Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 variances on property located at 1601 Lyman Boulevard. Senior center Applicant is Plowshares Development, LLC. Finance Section 503.2.3. P5211 Fax:952.227.1110 Planning Case: 05-37 Park & Recreation I have reviewed theabove rezoning request. In order to comply with the Chanhassen Phone: 952.227.1120 Fire D artment/Fire Prevention Division, I have the followingfire code or city Fax: 952.227,1110 � Recreation Center ordinance/policy requirements. The plan review is based upon the available 2310 Coulter Boulevard information submitted at this time. If additional plans or changes are submitted the Phone: 952.227.1400 appropriate code or policy items will be addressed. Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & 1. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs Natural Resources must be either removed from site or chipped. Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 2, Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be Public Warks installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and 1591 Park Road during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of PFax::52. 27.13100 Fax: 952.227.1310 protection are provided. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and P P aPP � maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so Senior center as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Phone: 952.227.1125 Section 503.2.3. Fax: 952 227.1110 Web site 3. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once www.ci,chanhassen.mn.us construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. 4. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes. quality schools. a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Sharmin Al-Jaff October 25, 2005 Page 2 5. Fire hydrant spacing is acceptable. 6. Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 7. A cul-de-sac shall be designed into the end of the new proposed roads by lot 12. Dimensions should be 90 -foot in diameter. Submit details to Chanhassen City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. g:�safety\rnI\plrevs05-37 • • Planning Commission Meeting — December 6, 2005 PUBLIC HEARING: STONEFIELD: REOUEST FOR REZONING FROM AGRICULTURAL ESTATE DISTRICT, A2 TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, RSF, SUBDIVISION REVIEW FOR 30 LOTS,1 OUTLOT AND PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH VARIANCES ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1601 LYMAN BOULEVARD, APPLICANT PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT, LLC, PLANNING CASE NO. 05-37. Public Present: Name Address Dave Hess Rick Dorsey 8682 Flamingo Drive 1551 Lyman Boulevard Sharmeen Al-Jaff presented the staff report on this item. Papke: I'll start. Between the amendments to the city code we changed tonight and the huge number of conditions in here, I don't think I followed how we're handling the minimum 90 foot. We just amended the city, the ordinances tonight to go from a 90 foot lot width at frontage, correct? Al-Jaff: Correct, Papke: And there are lots in the proposal here that do not meet that, correct? Al-Jaff: Correct. Papke: And point me to the condition that makes these lots satisfy that or is there no such condition right now? Al-Jaff: There's no such condition right now. At the time when final plat appears before the city, if they meet current ordinance requirements. Papke: Then there's no issue. AI-Jaff: Then there is no issue. If the ordinances that you adopted were approved by the City Council and published, then that becomes the new ordinance that they need to meet, and the final plat would have to be adjusted accordingly. Papke: Just to minimize confusion, would there be any legal issues if we just added a condition to stipulate 90 foot lot widths tonight so that we don't have to re -visit this or what are. A]-Jaff: Your, the ordinance today. Papke: Yes, we have to. We have to follow the ordinance. 40 SCANNED 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — December 6, 2005 Al -Jaffa Correct. Papke: Dang. That makes it very confusing. Al -Jaffa The setback from the pipeline is a zoning setback. That is something that they would need to comply with, whether everything gets approved today or a month from now. They would have to comply with that. Papke: I just have one other, it's probably pretty trivial question. On page 6 there was a mention of use of shredded wood should be considered. Okay. For what and again I didn't see anything in the conditions to stipulate that. I mean it's a nice wishful thinking statement but what do we do with that? What are you really proposing there? But then it starts talking about site exit pads so are we talking, what are we actually considering the shredded wood for use on? You know over what areas? You know I understand it's erosion control but where are you proposing to put it and where is it enforced within the conditions? Or is it not? Are you just suggesting that that's something we should chat about? Al -Jaffa Just a suggestion. And it's over ... and I will make sure that I work with Lori Haak, our Water Resource Coordinator to clarify this further before it get to City Council. Papke: Okay. Zorn: Sharmeen, I've got a question in regards to the wetland. There are 6 that are identified. Can you just remind me and everyone here this evening what incidental refers to. 5 of the 6 are considered incidental and are exempt. Al -Jaffa Those are man made ponds. For instance there is an existing pond right now in this area. That's a storm pond. It's man made. Therefore it does not, it's exempt. Zorn: Okay, so if someone thinks that it's not a true wetland, even though it likely looks like a nice prairie wetland right now that ... protected. Al -Jaffa Often when you look at ditches along highways you'll see cattails in them. Zom: Okay. McDonald: Dan. Keefe: Keeping on the water theme. Can you just sort of describe, I mean we've got a lot of steep grades on this property. You even indicate in your report historical problems with erosion on this property. Can you just kind of give us an overview of how the water flows and what the water management plan is. Before I get into specifics I'd like to kind of. Al -Jaffa Sure. One of the problems that we have encountered deals with water and erosion problems in this area. One of the projects that are currently being undertaken by the city and going back to our Water Resource Coordinator, Lori Haak, she is working to try and expand this c 41 Planning Commission Meeting — December 6, 2005 • pond. Stabilize grades. Minimize erosion. Currently, if you ... there is a valley in this area. With the grading of this site, all of these grades will be changed and water redirected to flow into, this will become a regional pond. Keefe: Even the southern end? Al-Jaff: The southern end. Keefe: Where we've got real steep grades. Al-Jaff: The southern end will be maintained to the west. There is a swale that's being created along the southern portion of the site. And it should maintain the natural drainage pattern. Keefe: Currently the properties to the east, are they large lot or are they commercial or what is it? Al-Jaff: Property to the west? Keefe: East ... and then to the west is, is it ag to the west side? Al-Jaff: We have city park out here. And then, well you have large lot in this area. Keefe: Okay, so in terms of where we're directing the water to get out, to drain off this property, it's going to be going into the large pond that is going to be expanded potentially to the northeast? AI-Jaff: Majority of the water will be draining in that direction. Keefe: Then on the southern end it drains into, will drain into the adjacent property or where does that go? A]-Jaff: It will be, there is a ditch that is being created, a swale that's being created. Keefe: In terms of the runoff. Undestad: Does that take it down to that storm drain down here? That private storm? Al-Jaff: Can the engineer answer the question regarding the drainage pattern? Kurt: ...how well it comes through. What we're looking at here is the drainage map. There is 6 �/2 acres of drainage that will sheet flow into this existing swale that is the discharge for this, the pond up here. This water coming from the west and a majority of the hard surface will be redirected to the pond. Just a, give you something to compare that to, what is happening now and to get a feel for some of the issues and some of the drainage problems they've been experiencing. Currently this is a farm field and there is 26, 23 acres approximately that just sheet 42 Planning Commission M•ng — December 6, 2005 • flows into this same swale that we are now taking down 6'/z acres. Greatly reducing the rate of erosion through that ravine and giving a mechanism for controlling that discharge rate. Keefe: So you're saying the water flows from the west property through this property to the pond. So how does your grading work? Undestad: How does the water get to the pond? Back to that creek. Keefe: Yeah. Kurt: This area is higher than our development and there are rear yard catch basins going along these lots to collect the drainage. Take it into the street storm sewer. And there's a low point in the road over here. This is coming up to match back into the existing grades. This starting to shed some light on it a little. Undestad: Then the lots on the other side. Keefe: Do they all slope, the lots on the east side. Kurt: The lots on this side, you know we are putting the rear yard drainage and some of the house drainage along the Swale and it's going to be private storm sewer and simply discharge at the base of the slope so that it doesn't pick up a lot of momentum and pick up sediment. Keefe: And then the lots north of that. Kurt: These are just going to be sheet flowing, almost exactly as they are now. ...it will be maintained lawn versus a crop which is sometimes better. Keefe: Okay. Undestad: Is that pond then, does that get piped? Kurt: This pond apparently discharges. Undestad: Into that field at the bottom of the plat there. Kurt: And it flows over, through here and makes a new ravine and eventually gets to a culvert underlying. McDonald: Where are these private pipes that you were talking about that were not going to be maintained? Kurt: Right here in these rear yards. There's just one catch basin here. That's our man hole ... here. 43 Planning Commission Meeting — December 6, 2005 • Keefe: I guess in terms of comfort level the city has with, you know I mean just given the issues we've had with water this summer and the steep grades associated with this particular piece of property and how comfortable are we with the solution. That we aren't going to create issues when the property to the west develops. It doesn't look like, it looks like the west is even higher. It looks like the west flows into this property more than, because from my understanding is the property to the west is going to develop at some point single family more than likely. Al -Jaffa The storm pond would have to be sized to accommodate all of the water. And there is an expansion of the storm pond proposed. Engineering department were working with 100 year calc's. Drainage calc's. Keefe: So, we just have to meet the standards associated, alright. Thank you. Undestad: Wait a minute while we've got the engineer up there. One more question on the retaining walls that you show on there. The by others. Is that something that again, I mean I know that you have a comment in here that the custom grading doesn't make sense. The walls that you're going to propose on there, these have been lowered I understand from where they used to be and those may be kind of exhausted all options on even trying to get those down even smaller or. Kurt: Maximum wall height was originally 20 feet. Typically be graded in for a lot and we were able to lower that to a maximum height of 10 or 11 feet. We shifted this road connection point over 20 feet. Because of this hill here we had to come up and tie into existing grades and make sure that this connection would work in the future to extend this. By moving this over 20 feet, we were able to lower that 4 feet and make it, it will be a little more of a similar transition to extend this road over to Audubon. And because we're working with some custom builders of homes, we have some privileges to do a garage low which means the garage is going to low side and they just have to kind of do it, it just needs a little more attention. It's not going to be any sort of big drainage issue. And then staff brought down another 3 feet or so and then we pulled the wall in slightly and end up with our results going from 20 feet max height down to 11. Undestad: So when you moved that road that way, is that what moved the line? Or was it keeping 5 acres to the south? Kurt: Well our grades are being pinned by where we had to tie because we were, this is the maximum allowed grade. Slightly under, 6.9. I believe you guys allow 7 is your typical maximum so by moving that down it just shifted the whole road down and then by moving the garage to the lower side of the lot, shifting the house down with that. We also extended the basement from a 9 foot to a 10 foot and taken some liberties with a custom builder again that we can try to reduce some of those walls. Undestad. And the walls are boulder walls out there that they're proposing? Kurt: Yes. Undestad: Okay. U Planning Commission Meeting — December 6, 2005 • McDonald: I have a couple questions for you. The pond and Lot 3, I'm not quite sure I understand that. Are you saying that, at that point if the pond is extended, does that put restrictions on Lot 3 that it's not usable anymore? Al-Jaff: If I said Lot 3, then I mis-spoke. It should be Block 3. McDonald: Block 3. Al-Jaff: And this is Block 3. This entire area. The back of these lots can accommodate ponding. McDonald: Okay. So it's Block 3 Al-Jaff: Yes. McDonald: All the lots in Block 3 will get ponding. Okay, then the other question I've got, we planned for a connection to the west property. What about a connection to the south property? What's going to happen with that? Is that developable? Al -Jaffa It really isn't developable. It has extremely steep grades, bluffs. It's in the Bluff Creek Overlay District. There are too many issues... McDonald: Okay, so we don't have to worry about somebody coming in at some point and wanting an access into that. Generous: They could come from Audubon or Lyman. McDonald: But it's highly unlikely because of the land. Al-Jaff: That's what we believe. That it is highly unlikely. McDonald: Okay. That's all the questions I had. Anyone else? Would the applicant like to come forward and add anything else that we haven't already discussed? Nathan Franzen: Sure. Good evening Commissioners. My name is Nathan Franzen with Plowshares Development. We got into a few of the comments already but this is our fourth project since 2000 in Chanhassen and we're very pleased to be back servicing a new neighborhood. I just want to tell you a few of the general comments about the neighborhood that we find very attractive and appealing is just the good balance of the different types of lots. We have 17 walkouts, 2 lookouts and 11 full basements. We also have a nice variety of larger lots that can accommodate a pool or large play structures. We also have some that are wooded for people to have less lawn if they choose to. So overall for us it's a great project. We're talking to 3 custom builders. We're about 95% there getting our contracts done. I'd let you know who those are as soon as I'm able to. They are approximating their home prices, the lot and home prices to be starting in approximately the 550 range and going up to somewhere in the 900 range. 45 Planning Commission Meeting — December 6, 2005 Their typical home will be a 4 to 5 bedroom, 3 car, 2,500 square feet. You're pretty standard Chanhassen home that you see lately. And just, I want to go over a couple things that we've been working on with staff. This is our second submission. Our first submission we pulled, due to two staff concerns and that was primarily the retaining walls that we talked about, and the other one's the livability of the lots themselves. Staff had concerns that we didn't have enough rear, flat rear yard and we, and in conjunction with the, looking at the retaining wall issue we made sure that every lot had 20 feet of useable rear yard space. We also, I hope you all understand what happened with the retaining wall. It was a very teeter tottering effect between saving trees and reducing the height of the walls. If you have more questions about that, we can certainly get into that. We also did hold a neighborhood meeting. We had about 30 people attend. My opinion of what the neighborhood concerns primarily consisted upon some, there are some existing trees along this edge and along this edge. Between the proposed lots and existing lots. The neighbors had concern about those. Unfortunately most of those are going to be removed because of drainage creating some swales along property lines. We did commit to planting as many trees as possible. I think if you look at our landscape plan you'll see that we've taken as much liberty with the trees along the existing development so that we can buffer our proposed lots with the existing lots. And lastly on the ponding issue, I've been working directly with Lori on the pond and the city's consultant has been working directly with Kurt and we don't anticipate any problems incorporating a larger regional solution into the design of our project. And if you have any questions about that, any more specific we can get into it but that is the gist of my comments. If you have any questions. Keefe: I've got a couple questions. You know just looking at the tree inventory, I mean you guys are taking out a lot of trees. Even in the report it talks about that you exceed the recommended number. Can you speak to what you guy's strategy was in regards to that? Nathan Franzen: Sure. The existing property as proposed actually doesn't even meet your ordinance because it is mostly a farm field. So even if we came in with 0 removal we'd still be below ordinance and we'd be penalized in planting above and beyond. So I just want to start out there so that's where we started from. And the majority of the tree loss does happen on the southern end of the site where we're trying to make that road connection and it has always been our desire to save as many trees as possible and that's why we came in with such large retaining walls at fust, with the 20 foot walls which are very expensive for us to construct. But we feel it's worth building because it allows people to be closer to the trees and we saved more trees doing it that way. Working with staff we were able to come to a compromise which, you know there's always the age old question between engineers and trees and which is more important. The steep grades, the higher retaining walls, so this really went back and forth but I'm actually pretty happy with how it turned out because our tree line loss from our first proposal, which had a 20 foot wall, is almost in the same location and we were able to achieve that through what Kurt described in shifting the road slightly to the south. I guess the long and short of the question is, I think we've done it as best as we can on this site and that, I guess that's my comment. Keefe: The other question is in, I think it was mentioned a trail connector I think through Outlot A. Can you kind of direct me? Nathan Franzen: It's the blue line. Cbl Planning Commission Meeting — December 6, 2005 Keefe: Okay, to take you over to the park. And is there a sidewalk along the road or is there just? Nathan Franzen: There's a sidewalk on one side, yeah. Keefe: That's all I have. McDonald: Okay. Kurt, you have anything? Deborah? Mark? Undestad: I just had a couple quick ones here. Kind of goes back to that drainage and that pond and stuff. It's all at the bottom of that Power Hill Park over there. There's an outlet that doesn't really show on my utility plan here but there's an outlet out of that pond that comes out by. Nathan Franzen: You're talking about this outlet? Undestad: Yes. And that just surface drains along the back field there? Nathan Franzen: Correct, it currently does. As this is proposed, that's what happened, but in working with Lori, the city has already hired the consultant to accommodate some additional plans and some of the ideas the consultant is looking at is adding a second pond in this location and then actually doing a wetland bank for that water to even slow the water down. The big problem is that there's too much water going too fast through that ravine and when it gets down to the bottom it's totally washing out. Undestad: So if you leave it at the bottom of that field where it's washing out it's. Nathan Franzen: Correct. Undestad: Right now you can slide down there and it disappears. Nathan Franzen: It's somewhat of a safety hazard I know for people sliding. And the solution Undestad: Is that going to change then when you do this? Nathan Franzen: Yes. When the city project that's being, basically what's happening is the city's coming in to fix the greater issue. It just so happens that we are developing at the same time so we're going to piggy back and work together when we have our SAD equipment out there, we'll be fixing it but the answer is, yes. We'll be addressing that, the start of that ravine, the water that flows into that ravine. Slowing it all down. Providing more storage. It's a big regional fix. Undestad: The other thing looking on your tree preservation plan back there, I noticed that about half of the trees that you're saving back there are the box elder and the elm trees, which all those big maples disappeared and the elm trees are hanging around which pretty much you can count those every year on how fast they die out and tip over back there. 47 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — December 6, 2005 Nathan Franzen: Yeah and unfortunately since the tree survey was taken we even lost a few of the big maples to the wind storm but it's, again I think we've done is the best we can to accommodate saving as many trees as possible. Undestad: And that, Sharmeen you made a comment that all this was taken into the entire site. If no trees were cut down they still wouldn't. Al -Jaffa They would still need to do a replacement. A reforestation and that's what the reforestation ordinance looks for is to take farm fields and. Undestad: Put trees in them. AI -Jaffa Put trees in them. Undestad: Right. But the farm field part wouldn't have changed anyway. It's the wooded area on the other side that's kind of getting tore up in there. Okay. McDonald: Okay, is that it? Okay, at this point we have no further questions and this is a public meeting. I will throw it open to the floor. Anyone wishing to come forward to make comments, please do so. Just state your name and address and address the commission. Dave Hess: My name is Dave Hess. I live at 8682 Flamingo Drive. My property is against Power Hill Park. Four lots down a hill from the entrance to the park so I get a first hand view of the overland flooding that occurs when we have intense rainfall out there. It's a river and it goes into that gully and it erodes and it's a problem right now that needs to be fixed. I have to trust that the engineers will figure out a way to fix the drainage there. But I don't know that I'd want to own one of those lots down in that valley either once it gets developed but that's an engineering situation that I don't want to get into but just a couple of things that I wanted to talk about is Power Hill Park as you know is a sledding hill and the sledders go onto this private property now I believe and they sled all the way up to where that washed out area is. Now it sounds as though they're proposing a drainage pond right where these sledders will be going and has there been talk about safety issues with sledders going onto this pond or is there a berm proposed that will stop the sledders or a wall that they can smash into or what, it hasn't been addressed yet tonight. I assume it's been addressed but... Al -Jaffa There will be, actually one of Commissioner Undestad asked the same question a few days ago and there will be a combination of plantings as well as a berm. Undestad: They want to try to slow you down with short grass, tall grass and tallest grass but again I mean that kind of came before potential pond down at the bottom of the hill too so I'm not sure where that was laid out in there. Dave Hess: Okay. My primary concern I guess is the steep grade. I think Dan has addressed that in his comments so. It's a difficult site with some hydraulic issues and some erosion problems. I have to trust that it's being looked into. Thank you. M Planning Commission Meeting — December 6, 2005 • McDonald: Thank you. Anyone else? Rick Dorsey: My name is Rick Dorsey. Property at 1551 Lyman Boulevard. I want to ask a question related to that drainage. The engineer suggested that the water flow eventually goes to underneath Lyman. Where is that? Can you tell me that. Nathan Franzen: It goes under Audubon. Rick Dorsey: So how does it get, can you show me on here, on the bigger map, the flow of the water. Undestad: Degler's. Goes down Degler's driveway. Kurt: It snakes down through the woods. Under the driveway back along this and then dissipates into this... Rick Dorsey: Then just another quick question in the subdivision where the southern part is being separated off. Are there any issues in doing that now with future plans to redevelop Lyman Boulevard as far as access points? That kind of thing. I'm aware they're trying to get rid of access points because they want to take mine so I just want to find out you know what, how that parcel fits into the whole thing too. Thank you. McDonald: I think that was the question that I asked where you assured no development. Al -Jaffa No development down in that area. Rick Dorsey: There's a house there now. Al -Jaffa Correct, but there is no additional proposed homes in that area and everything should stay status quo. McDonald: Anyone else? Okay, seeing no one else, we'll close the public meeting and I'll bring it back up to the commissioners for comments. Start with Mark this time. Undestad: Well, I think I got most of my questions answered in there. I guess you know still the draining issues around there are still, they finally answered it enough. Both on the bottom of the sliding hill and what washes into that creek down there. It all leads down to Lyman. Again I did talk with parks about, you know the bottom of the hill with how to control the sledders down there. There is a chunk of that creek, that ravine right now that just drops straight down in a hole and it's a fun place to hide for those... If we dump all this water into there and again surface drain it right across there, is there going to be a real problem down there once that starts going in. If we put another pond in down there, now we've got everybody sliding down a hill into a pond, which isn't bad in January when it's froze up but if it was a November snowfall, they're going to be sending them right down into a thin layer of ice in there. I think that's something that still needs to be looked at down there as far as drainage does. The overall plan, the design of the plan MO Planning Commission Meeting December 6, 2005 • I think is, they did a good job. He came back and changed retaining walls, explained all that and, yeah I think just still a little bit of an engineering to work on there. That's it. McDonald: Dan. Keefe: Yeah, this is what, the fourth, I think the fourth development Plowshares has come in and I think they really work well with the city and I commend them for really putting some effort in and working with the city to try to address the issues. I too am very concerned about the water and anything they can do to minimize the runoff, particularly in light of what we've experienced this past summer. Over design is probably the operative word now just because we're finding out that water, especially if we are getting heavier rain, more rains and you know 100 year events on a frequent basis. We need to start anticipating that. In addition to that I would like them to take another look at the, the trees that they're cutting to see if they might save you know a few extra, especially the more significant trees. I know you guys have really gone through and done a nice job of inventory but take another look at it and see if you might be able to save a couple more if at all possible so. Otherwise I think it's generally a good plan. McDonald: Deborah. Zorn: I think it is a, it looks to be a good plan this far as well and it's nice to see some variety in the home plans that you also included. On the tree note that Dan just mentioned, staff, you recommend on the bottom of page 10 for alternatives to be researched by the applicant and I didn't see that as part of the recommendations listed as one of the additional items so I guess I would be open to moving that perhaps to an amendment. And I guess I share some of the same drainage concerns as well. Those are my two comments. Papke: Nothing to add. McDonald: Nothing to add. I guess the only comment I've got is that, as I understand the way all this is now draining, it looks as though we're fixing a problem here but what about downstream and the whole southern half of all this property? I guess I would feel better with a total comprehensive plan but what are we going to do with this water? The sledding hill is a big issue. A potential liability that we really don't want to get into. I mean as you point out a November snow, there's a pond down there, that, you've got to stop people from getting on the ice and I know that that's a continual problem. It's probably just as much of a hazard down there now but with the ravine and everything but I think that's got to be tied in as part of the solution to all of this. I'm a little hesitant, I realize we can't hold it up because of lack of a comprehensive plan and I guess I will trust staff and the developer to work together in that area but I think you've got a problem with the water and I don't see a solution. I really don't. I see it for this property but there's property downstream. There's other impact of a city park. There's more than just this development and I think you can't just look at fixing things here and everything else takes care of itself. So I think that needs to be looked at a little bit better so that we do solve the problems but other than that, with what's going on and you know we get this thing developed, yeah. You've done a good job. You've come forward with some good housing plans and some good I think marketable inventory for the city so I'm pleased with all of that. 50 Planning Commission Meeting — December 6, 2005 The custom homes and those things will probably add a lot to those lots to the south. I guess that's all I've got to say on this. I'm done so can I get a motion. Keefe: I'll make a motion that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case number 05-37 for rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A2 to Single Family Residential for the Stonefield Subdivision as shown on plans stamped "Received November 18, 2005", and the Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat for Subdivision Case number 05-37 for Stonefield for 30 lots and 1 outlot with a right-of-way width variance as shown on the plans stamped "Received November 18, 2005", subject to conditions 1 through 27. McDonald: Do I have a second? Papke: Second. Keefe moved, Papke seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case #05-37 for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A2 to Single Family Residential for the Stonefield Subdivision as shown on the plans stamped "Received November 18, 2005". All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5to0. Keefe moved, Papke seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat for Subdivision Case #05-37 for Stonefield for 30 lots and 1 outlot with a right-of-way width variance, as shown on the plans stamped `Received November 18, 2005', subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will be required to meet the existing site runoff rates for 10 -year and 100 -year, 24-hour storm events. The proposed enlargement of the existing stormwater pond must be designed to meet the City's minimum standards and coordinated and approved by the City Water Resources Coordinator. 2. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations and a full-size drainage map must be submitted with the final plat for staff review and approval. 3. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood level. 4. Staff recommends that Type II silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, be used adjacent to the existing wetland, existing creek area, and around the proposed pond. In addition, tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. Erosion control blankets are recommended for all of the steep 3:1 slopes with an elevation change of eight feet or more. 5. All plans must be signed by a registered Civil Engineer in the State of Minnesota. 51 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — December 6, 2005 6. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health, Carver County and the Williams Pipe Line Company. 7. The developer must obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. 8. On the utility plan: a. Show all the proposed storm sewer pipe type, size and class. b. Show the sanitary sewer pipe slope and class. c. Show watermain pipe class (C900). d. Add a storm sewer schedule. e. Show the existing storm sewer between Lots 1 & 2, Block 1 within the center of the 20 - foot utility easement. f. Show the stormwater manholes rim and invert elevations. g. Add a note to remove the temporary pond outlet control structure. h. The last street -accessible storm manhole discharging to the stormwater pond must be manhole with sump. i. Add a note: any connection to an existing structure must be core drilled. j. Extend the storm sewer farther to the south along the proposed street. I Remove Lots 7 and 8 backyard storm sewer and add a storm sewer along the property line between Lots 4 and 5 and between Lots 8 and 9 block 4. 9. On the grading plan: a. Show Type II silt fence adjacent to wetland, pond, creeks, etc. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Use class 5 storm sewer in the roadway; revise the note under general grading and drainage notes accordingly. d. Extend the swale between Lots 1 and 2, Block 4 farther to the east. 10. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. In addition, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. 11. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,955.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,525.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees M be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. 52 Planning Commission Meng - December 6, 2005 12. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 13. Any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. 14. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. 15. The developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and construction of the lift station and forcemain and any associated costs. 16. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 17. Add a "dead-end road" sign at the cul-de-sac. 18. On the plat, show all existing and proposed street names. 19. Add City Detail Plate Nos. 1001, 1002, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1009, 2001, 2101, 2109, 2110, 2201, 2204, 3101, 3102, 3104, 3106, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5200, 5203, 5204, 5206, 5214, 5215, 5216, 5217, 5221, 5232, 5234, 5240, 5241, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A and 5313. 20. Show the street lights and a stop sign on the plans. 21. Submit public utility plans and profile for staff review. 22. City Forester's Conditions: a. A minimum of two overstory trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. b. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. c. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. d. Tree preservation on site shall be according to tree preservation plans dated 10/14/05. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 23. In the absence of parkland dedication, it is recommended that Stonefield pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final platting. At today's rate, these fees would total $120,000 (30 lots x $4,000). Additionally, the applicant is required to construct the 53 Planning Commission Meetinnf— December 6, 2005 0 neighborhood asphalt trail connector to the property line as depicted on their preliminary plan submittals. 24. Water Resource Coordinator's Conditions: a. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetland D. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. b. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. c. The applicant shall work with the City's consultant to accommodate regional and site- specific storm water needs. d. The approximate location and extent of drain tile shall be shown on the plans. The applicant shall provide details as to whether the tile line will be removed, abandoned in place or remain. If the tile is to remain, the flow from the tile shall be accommodated in the design of the storm water management plan. e. The applicant shall provide rate control and storm water treatment to reduce off-site impacts. To provide a low -gradient means for controlling rate and volume, the applicant shall consider cooperating with the City to construct a wetland in the rear portions of any number of Lots 1-8, Block 3. In the event that the applicant is interested in pursuing wetland construction for banking purposes, this planning shall be integrated with the City's consultant's storm water infrastructure planning. L Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) shall be provided over all existing wetlands, storm water infrastructure and storm water ponds. g. lie eve's pef dss"ert§ 'at, nY"o i steep grade in'tlie`southern portion of the property, custom grading would not save any additional trees. In addition, the developer maintains that the slope of the road and the location of the retaining walk make custom grading lots impractical. If the developer demonstrates to the satisfaction of staff that custom grading for their typical house pad would not result_ in additional sieant tree preservation, mass gra€of this area may be approved. h. The existing outlet structure of Pond A shall be removed and replaced in accordance with the City's standard detail. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) shall be provided for the pond. i. The portion of the silt fence that runs from the pipeline easement through Lot 7, Block 3 shall be moved upslope to the west by 30 to 60 feet to more clearly define the grading limits. The area of property between the silt fence and the gully and property line shall 54 Planning Commission M•ng — December 6, 2005 be seeded and mulched to control weeds and get a desirable cover crop in areas that were recently farmed. A temporary basin shall be constructed in the vicinity of Lots 6 and 7, Block 3. The temporary sediment basin shall be installed prior to disturbing upslope area. A temporary perforated riser and stable emergency overflow (EOF) for the basin shall be installed; details shall be included in the plan. The basin shall be properly sized for the watershed area, according to NPDES requirements (i.e. The basins must provide storage below the outlet pipe for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2 -year, 24-hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shall the basin provide less than 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe from each acre drained to the basin). k. Chanhassen Type 2 silt fence shall be provided for the perimeter of the site up to Lot 10, Block 3. From there, Type 1 may be used. Silt fence shall be shown on the plans around Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. 1. Curbside inlet controls are needed; Wimco type or ESS type (or approved similar protection) inlet controls shall be used. Curbside inlet protection shall be provided for existing inlets adjacent to the site exit on Osprey Lane. City standard inlet protection details 5302 and 5302A shall be included in the plans. The proposed rear yard catch basin protection shall be revised; Wimco type, ESS type or equal must be used. The proposed silt fence shall be installed with additional rock around Chanhassen type 1 silt fence. m. The plans shall be revised to show energy dissipation for the flared end section on Lot 7, Block 3. n. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Tyne of Slone Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. o. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. 55 Planning Commission Meeting — December 6, 200 p. In order to fund the maintenance and expansion of the BC -P4.10 storm water pond and construction of additional capacity, the costs will be allocated among the benefiting properties. The total cost of materials and construction will be divided by the number of acres in the resulting subwatershed. The City will be responsible for the acres contributing from land already developed, park land and land to be developed in the future (e.g., the Bongard parcel). The developer will be responsible for the acres contributing from their development. If, for any reason, the regional storm water facility is not constructed, the developer will be responsible for providing storm water quality and quantity management on the subject property and paying Surface WaterWrtagement connection charges in accordance with City Code. At this time, the estimated total SWMP tee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $65,364. q. In conjunction with the BC -P4.10 storm water ponding project, land in addition to the land shown in Outlot A may be required. At this time, the estimated amount of land is approximately 0.5 acres. The developer and the City will seek to agree upon the terms of the use of land for ponding should additional land be required. The developer, if required, shall provide additional land for ponding. 25. Fire Marshall Conditions: a. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be either removed from site or chipped. b. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. c. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. d. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. e. Fire hydrant spacing is acceptable. f. Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 56 0 Planning Commission Meeting — December 6, 2005 26. Building Official Conditions: a. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. b. Demolition permits must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site. c. The developer must submit a list of proposed street names for review and approval prior to final plat of the property. d. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. e. Separate sewer and water services must be provided each lot. f. Existing wells and on-site sewage treatment systems on the site must be abandoned in accordance with State Law and City Code. 27. The retaining walls shall be maintained by a Homeowners Association. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Al-Jaff: Mr. Chairman? McDonald: Yes. Al -Jaffa There are 28 conditions. Keefe: Oh, you added one didn't you. 1 through 28. McDonald: The handout sheet you gave us. Could I get a correction then. Keefe: Yes. Conditions 1 through 28. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Papke noted the verbatim and summary minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated November 15, 2005 as presented. Acting Chair McDonald adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 9:45 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim 57 Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Web Site: http//www.rileypurgatorybluffcreek.org January 4, 2006 Mr. Nathan Franzen Plowshares Development LLC 1851 Lake Drive West, #550 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Permit #2005-35: Stonefield: Chanhassen Dear Mr. Franzen: Legal Advisor: Krebsbach 8 Haik 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4320 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612 333-7400 Fax: 612 333-6959 Engineering Advisor: Bar Engineering 4700 West 77th Street Minneapolis, MN 55435 952 832-2600 Fax: 952 832-2601 The Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District received your land grading and alteration plans and signed permit application on October 25, 2005. The District is required to approve, deny, or extend your permit within 60 days of receipt of the completed application. The District has reviewed the permit and determined that the application is incomplete. The District requires the following information to complete your application: The project must receive Planning Commission and City Council approval prior to the District taking action on the permit application. The District cannot act on the permit until your application is complete. Your application will be considered complete and formally received, upon receipt of the information required by the District's Engineering Advisor. The application will be presented to the Board of Managers at their regularly scheduled meeting on the first Wednesday of each month. The District will act accordingly within 60 days of the completed application. If you have any questions about the required information, please call the District's Engineer, Robert Obermeyer, at 952-832-2857. Sincerely, Obert C. Obermeyerr c: Paul Haik Mark Dillon Lori Haak/� Curt Neft ::ODMA\PCD0CS\D0CS\246588\2 Board of Managers Howard Peterson Mark Dillon Conrad Fiskness Philip Wright Erin Ahola December 14, 2005 Sharmeen Al-Jaff City of Chanhassen 6900 City Center Dr. P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Stonefield Dear Sharmeen: Ref: 20051114 We have revised the preliminary plat to accommodate the proposed zoning ordinance for a 20 foot setback from the gas line easement and miscellaneous revisions. The following is a summary of the changes: Lots 1 and 2, block 4 have been revised to provide additional width and area to lot 3. The buildable pad area with the 20 foot setback on Lot 3 will be 71.6 foot at the front setback and 49.4 foot at the rear of the 60 foot deep pad. We believe this is an adequate building area. See attached preliminary plat (20051114PPFOl.pdf) The lot line between lots 3 and 4, block 2 has been revised to be radial with the front right-of-way in order to increase the width of the buildable area at the front setback. The proposed buildable pad has been increased in depth to 90 feet in order to have a side loaded home constructed on this lot. A sketch of a lot fit including the driveway has been attached (2 -Lot Fid Lot 4.pdf). The impervious percentage for the attached lot fit is 22% with a deck included. The storm sewer between lots 1 and 2, block 1 is proposed to be removed and replaced on the lot line in order to increase the buildable pad area of lot 2. The existing storm sewer easement would be vacated with final plat and a 20 foot easement would be proposed centered between the lots. The buildable pad width of lot 2 would increase to 60.9 from 50.6 feet at the front setback and 68.0 from 57.8 feet at the rear of the pad. See the attached "Block l.pdf." The revised preliminary plat does not incorporate the proposed 90 foot frontage at the right-of-way ordinance change. We understand that if this ordinance is published prior to our preliminary plat approval we would have to revise the preliminary plat accordingly. If the 20 foot setback ordinance is not adopted we will likely revised the plat to increase the buildable pad area adjacent to the gas line easement. We formally request to be placed on the January 12'h, 2006 City Council Meeting as a consent agenda item as we are variance free and have resolved all of the City's concerns. December 14, 2005 Page 2 If you have any questions or comments upon review of this letter and the attached exhibits, we invite the opportunity to meet and discuss with staff. Sincerely, WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. Curtis Neft, PE Project Engineer PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT, INC. Nathan Franzen Project Manager 04005 Westwood Prof esslonoi Swn,o.$. Inc. / \ \ Temporary Ponding Easement to be Vacated: Mat part of the Northwest sooner o/ the Northwest Courter of Section 23, Township Range 2J Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows - Commencing ws: Commencing at the point of intersection of the centerline O f e r �� ^ \ of Osprey Lane as dedicated in the plot of LAKE SUSAN .> Sa10 Fd'` / /i` HILLS WEST 8TH ADD7710N, on file in said Carver County, and the southwest line of said LAKE SUSAN HILLS l4£ST 8TH ADD/DON; thence South 50 degrees 35 minutes 36 '.� __ L seconds West, along the southwest extension of said Q3 i - �•4t t�� 4+ ., centerline, o distance of 25.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence South 39 degrees 24 minutes 24 seconds East, a distance of 210.00 feet; thence South 5( degrees 35 minutes 36 seconds West, a distance of 180.00 feet; thence North 39 degrees 24 minutes 24 •�'i� seconds West, a distance of 210.00 feet; thence North 5( �: V degrees 35 minutes 36 seconds East, a distance of 180.00 feet to the point of beginning. Notm i T E V � 1.) This sketch it based on the Carver County Coordinate �i ?+ System, 1983 NAD (1966 adi). Record descriptions are ,I Iii based on an assumed coordinate system. —2.) This is not a boundary survey. y\ Ptg� � X — r rt rr- AIIAI 7 /A /1[- n_ VI IvYV liar vl Inc_ Ivry I/`r vL v. fir/ I VYi I I i/I Gla 10/m/05 tYer I or 1 2005111 s01owc w—r '-` n--�'°" Stonefield ". �>. Basement Vacation �_- +� Plowshares Development, LLC Sketch I see aa.swe . Ia�o�ii. rv..w ...... Chanhassen, Mb56917 W mtwmd CbaMaeav4 Minv�ola 02005 VNetwooE Profesalonal SeMcee, Inc. 0 �I C� — --vr n� 23 Se° of 1 a'6 N4 tl" IMe of tF° / -----7 ----r -- Inti \ Lix � lk k/ e � / hll Al n lo /fir— rl lr' I V VY I / •C VI I hi- %VI VY r / •� Vlr f—/♦ _ v WN C- L_v. tea I ry" . 9 f � Ak;' Basement to be Vacated That port of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, which lies within a strip of land 50.00 feet in width, the centerline is described as follows: Beginning of the point of Intersection of the centerline of Osprey Lone as dedicated in the plat of LAKE SUSAN HILLS WEST STH ADDITION, on file in said Carver County and the southwest line of sold LAKE SUSAN HILLS WEST 8TH ADDITION; thence South 50 degrees 35 minutes 36 seconds West, along the southwest extension of sold centerline, a distance of 72.93 feet and there terminating. Also that port of sold Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of section 23, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, which lies within c strip of land 60.00 feet in width, the centerline is described as follows: Beginning at the point of termination of the above described strip of land; thence southwest a distance of 130.91 feet along a curve concave to the northwest, tangent to the above described centerline, o central angle of 25 degrees 00 minutes 04 seconds, and o radius of 300.00 feet to the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and there terminating. Sold strips of land are to extend by their full width from sold southwest llne of LAKE SUSAN HILLS WEST 87H ADDITION to said west line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter. Some being as described in Document No. 169284. Notes: sketch Is based on the Carver County Coordinate System, 1983 NAD (1986 adj.). Record descriptions are based on an assumed coordinate system. 2.) This is not o boundary survey. p 10/2D/05 sr° I a, 1 I W IWcI Prep°rw ter Stonefield Basement Vacation Plowshares Development, LLC Sketch MinnsMe 500 Wastmcod ....ws (3eebe Yma.w NW. COR. NW. 1/4 OF — THE NW. 1/4 SEC. 23 1 71.06 I I 1 / —N. UNE NW. 1/4 OF THE NW. 1/4 SEC. 23 I I `y I oar oos I 1 = I I 0o I g I I 18 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I r10 1 I 110 1 I � I I II 1 1 1.) This sketch is based on the Carver County Coordinate System, 1983 NAD (1986 od/.). Record descriptions are based on an assumed coordinate system. This is not a boundary survey. r.. 0;2. rr.r. =V er rrw wet ovn� sa ooh iou� eau �s s n n December 5, 2005 Sharmeen Al-Jaff City o anhassen 6900 Ci enter Dr. P.O. Box 147 Chanh MN 55317 Re: Stonefield Dear Sharmeen: Ref: 2005 -1114 -CO After review of the conditions for Preliminary Plat from the staff report for December 6, 2005, Plowshares Development, Inc. and Westwood Professional Services, Inc. have the following response comments: 1. Agree 2. Agree 3. Agree 4. Agree 5. Agree 6. Agree 7. Agree 8. We request the staff report be revised to make reference to final plans for the list of required information. e. The existing storm sewer will be removed and replace in the center of the easement or the existing easement will be vacated and an easement will be plated over the current alignment. k. a request additional clarification on this condition. 9. request the staff report be revised to make reference to final plans for the list of required information. 10. Agree Please amend the last sentence to: "Sanitary sewer and water main hookup nfees will be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building 1 V permit." 12. We will work with adjacent home owners and acquire temporary construction easements for grading and landscape work 13. Agree An Agreement should be in place stating that any future developments served by the liftstation should be responsible for reimbursement to Plowshares Development, Inc. for their portion of service provided by the liftstation. 5. Agree The 1 cul -de -s is temporary and will be connected to Audubon road at a future date. Should a sign be posted stating the future connection to Audubon road in place of the "Dead-end road?" December 5, 2005 Page 3 b. We request this condition be removed because no structures are present on the project. f. We request this condition be removed because no wells or drain fields exist on the project. 23. Agree After review of the preceding response comments please feel free to contract Nathan Franzen or myself for further discussion. Nathan Franzen can be reached at 952-361- 0832 or I can be reached at 952-906-7405. We sincerely appreciate the time and effort spent on this project by city staff and look forward to proceeding toward final plat. Sincerely, WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. Curtis Neft, PE Project Engineer AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Haak, Lori Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 10:31 AM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: Stonefield Recommended Language Sharmin— On Friday morning, we talked to Nathan Franzen about 3 issues with the Stonefield development. Per his request, here is some additional language to be included in the record for the Planning Commission. 1. Allocation of costs for storm water management: In order to fund the maintenance and expansion of the BC -P4.10 storm water pond and construction of additional capacity the costs will be allocated among the benefitting properties. The total cost of materials and construction will be divided by the number of acres in the resulting subwatershed. The City will be responsible for the acres contributing from land already developed, park land and land to be developed in the future (e.g., the Bongard parcel). The developer will be responsible for the acres contributing from their development. If, for any reason, the regional storm water facility is not constructed, the developer will be responsible for providing storm water quality and quantity management on the subject property and paying Surface Water Management connection charges in accordance with City Code. 2. Custom grading: The developer asserts that, due to the steep grade in the southern portion of the property, custom grading would not save any additional trees. In addition, the developer maintains that the slope of the road and the location of the retaining wall make custom grading lots impractical. If the developer demonstrates to the satisfaction of staff that custom grading for their typical housepad would not result in additional significant tree preservation, mass grading of this area may be approved. 3. Potential for credit for dedicated land: In conjunction with the BC -P4.10 storm water ponding project, land in addition to the land shown in Outlot A may be required. At this time, the estimated amount of land is approximately 0.5 acres. The developer and the City will seek to agree upon the terms of the use of land for ponding should additional land be required. Please let me know if you have questions Lori AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Haak, Lori Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 10:31 AM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: Stonefield Recommended Language Sharmin-- On Friday morning, we talked to Nathan Franzen about 3 issues with the Stonefield development. Per his request, here is some additional language to be included in the record for the Planning Commission. 1. Allocation of costs for storm water management: In order to fund the maintenance and expansion of the BC -P4.10 storm water pond and construction of additional capacity, the costs will be allocated among the benefitting properties. The total cost of materials and construction will be divided by the number of acres in the resulting subwatershed. The City will be responsible for the acres contributing from land already developed, park land and land to be developed in the future (e.g., the Bongard parcel). The developer will be responsible for the acres contributing from their development. If, for any reason, the regional storm water facility is not constructed, the developer will be responsible for providing storm water quality and quantity management on the subject property and paying Surface Water Management connection charges in accordance with City Code. 2. Custom grading: The developer asserts that, due to the steep grade in the southern portion of the property, custom grading would not save any additional trees. In addition, the developer maintains that the slope of the road and the location of the retaining wall make custom grading lots impractical. If the developer demonstrates to the satisfaction of staff that custom grading for their typical housepad would not result in additional significant tree preservation, mass grading of this area may be approved. 3. Potential for credit for dedicated land: In conjunction with the BC -P4.10 storm water ponding project, land in addition to the land shown in Outlot A may be required. At this time, the estimated amount of land is approximately 0.5 acres. The developer and the City will seek to agree upon the terms of the use of land for ponding should additional land be required. Please let me know if you have questions. Lori b( 5 �Y &104 3 L 141 A- 1115- If e 'CV fCi.(�%� (Q�1C C o 0 J Noe �1 5, 200 s f \ r QN � M -g -g—:- t.—t. 2 Y. IMM ..,. �a:Laam �.•N��p-^ T�Liww�•��N'��8'i�.�:'•:w .""..N�lw! r pW�wy wlw l Wi:"i•+w+r ��rMN"�. w.•r'.iw9yw"t'J�il'�o:i.r �vY� dr�YlN awn M�..�Mw Y.p�li•lHr �.4w .mow �Y= M Mxn. Mwp Y� w—Y Ili lw li,..w�iV wa�Ylw. Mw �M.Y h.�OarwlwlYMw.�YNlw` ININI NYNL..M.rwlW r Y%ns. wwMwaN wh Iw /ryl yyNI.Fw YMIMry Wlww Yh l Mrrwr �a.4 wiirrN Y!'Nw vNYMrw..r.r.s•wlMfNv w.... •.�J wr.M.arp.vpq w w. N M/ � h.! iq • w!M s' w. m+Y Iwwr. ^� +rN rY w. 1N w..w r... • w.M w... w...I.MY r fall IAwlwod RJmbdS•11m; Yr �S1.19�:•fij..4fSL'ii f�rr I w 1 _---_--- �� -__ �= = Wit. — f.+rw.w a ..... .. _r w�••n•wY �. w�hNsw. • e _.� ♦ uit B , m 0v .�.� O.w.w • � vnr p, � 1NMW s�rlw • v.nl I�Or� vRY1f ®' •Ilw ve rY w. 1N w..w r... • w.M w... w...I.MY r fall IAwlwod RJmbdS•11m; Yr �S1.19�:•fij..4fSL'ii f�rr I w 1 _---_--- �� -__ �= = Wit. GR�OM - = GIRDER TRUSS B E nF �#1 $!R P R o -II t';S4 .. r N 6kR t2l P B N3i 6 4'-9' L 6' 4' 6 4' i M OPEN TO BELOW {+ RR 6 0 OPEN TO' B FOYER I 7' r a Y N L------ -- amaore '�g�, s 1 1 < In:ae J azpYM1 rlO.N 1 rs�n, ®r /// S 1' -i r ¢"Vie' r• �LRM1 ;11 su Y��'�l 'nt � ' I as I�n4g wvirazl I I I F{CCE AM M..... I 'K: SCS.' H71.lS glul �.. ,i..a \ 10. \. 11;✓. YWtl 11 II II 111 I \1 /_ 1 r1 3a �' �i 111 Y ill �� j1 II; -9 li 1`0 5 y�l �. �—.,rovyww.vt, +Iiy, i nantl Ur/u+t� �II I `i 1i suu J�lili esaw .I gli lil nm7v all IeS�nwT\ 0.A a ramr /; larm .. Ij 110 0 1jTYCrLaf MYild py Ni.w I[Ws IaNp ilwb�(wW+J nn.r+wM - .r Mm• w _ rz n n4urur. nr,uvu ra n� www wJ w[nu.e w.al.+ ��n°� u Aw II `\ it a 11 II �aI_ rfi atl �I @ 11 I 4 G 1 E ruaavJ t row JO.R nxfr i i0lhlm 111 R - IIII ".: : `id ti rpe _ wr.r...r'S• w�[:.rn�s. � wrr. w....r. • •rrwe� Plowshares �Devemlo4pment, Inc irr u. mw rr . w (w1 Yi »Y (wLlv�ssrw •lwlu Stonefield J 2 75,264 sf 1 76,324 sf 75,200 sf wd, is 05-3-7 City Council Meeting — January 9, 2006 Kate Aanenson: Well this one is unique in the fact that they're acquired an outlot to assemble with their property to secure dock rights. They're all unique, every time you do one. You know typically the one we most recently looked at prior to this didn't have riparian rights. While this is an outlot, it clearly has riparian rights. It's the fact that it was kind of what precipitated this is the staff's belief that that outlot was, the ... provide just open space and not be used as a structure. The one we most recently looked at, the City Council, that one, you couldn't get to the depth to make that work so it didn't meet all the standards of a dock, while this one is on an outlot. It can meet the dock standards just as the impact to mitigate that for the, because it's going through the wetland. It can meet the depth on all that. And I think at the end of the day the goal with the wetland alteration permit, what we're trying to prevent is them selling off additional property and allowing somebody else to get a dock, and through the wetland alteration permit, which is our goal is not to have additional docks. So that's really, through a few years of negotiations, that's the ultimate goal is not to have additional docks on that outlot and that's what the wetland alteration permit will give us. Councilman Lundquist: Roger, that's within our power and jurisdiction to prevent structures or further subdivision or put that as a condition on that wetland alteration permit? Roger Knutson: Mayor and council members, yes it is because if we didn't, without that condition they could sell off that outlot and someone could use it for a stand alone dock. That'd be in violation of our zoning ordinance. Docks are allowed as an accessory to a principle dwelling. You can't just by a lot and just put a dock on, unless you qualify as a recreational beachlot, which is a whole different animal. Councilman Lundquist: Okay. Okay, that's all I had. Thank you. Mayor Furlong: Okay, any other questions on this item? If not, is there a motion? Councilman Lundquist: Motion to approve. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Is there a second? Councilwoman Tjorhom: Second. Mayor Furlong: Made and seconded. Any discussion? Councilman Lundquist moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council approve a Wetland Alteration Permit to construct a dock at 6539 Grey Fox Curve for Kenton and Julia Kelly. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of5to0. STONEFIELD,1601 LYMAN BOULEVARD, PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT, LLC: A. B. TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. RSF. 7 City Council Meeting — January 9, 2006 C. REQUEST FOR SUBDIVISION INTO 30 LOTS,1 OUTLOT AND PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH VARIANCES. Public Present: Name Address Mark Edman 1572 Bluebill Trail Brent Hislop 1851 Lake Drive West #550 Curtis Neft Westwood Professional Services Matt Amack 8633 Alisa Court Craig J. Renir 8668 Flamingo Drive Matt Goldstein Lundgren Bros. Construction Steve Buan 8740 Flamingo Drive Mayor Furlong: There are a number of items here, the fust one of which and while it's listed under public hearing is related to vacation of existing drainage and utility easements. There's also a request for rezoning of the property and request for preliminary subdivision so staff report please and make sure at some point that we get into the public hearing. We don't want to. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Remind me when I get, but I'm going to wrap them all together. Kind of go back to the vacation. Kind of site where the property is. The subdivision and then back, circle back around to why we need to do the vacations. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Kate Aanenson: So if I forget you can help remind me to open up the public hearing. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Kate Aanenson: Subject site, the Goers property is located off of Lyman. The current driveway comes that way but this subdivision actually will come off of Osprey Lane. It's the only way to access this property. Wooded area on the south. So this is the existing. There is a 50 foot right- of-way existing on that. That's the variance that you see before you tonight, is we think that transition from the 50 to the 60. This item was heard before the Planning Commission on December 6`s to review the development. They approved, voted 6-0 to approve the subdivision itself. I'll go through the subdivision. The critical issues there and then like I said, I'll circle back and talk about the project itself. Again they're splitting part of the Goers' property, the property to the south of this. This is heavily wooded. There was a question brought up earlier at the Planning Commission meeting as preservation of trees. This is not in the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The Bluff Creek Overlay District is further south of this so this is treated. The wooded area as we do with any other project for the tree preservation and there's a requirement to actually replace a significant amount of trees. Part of this property is currently farmed so. Another question that arose, there are changes that you approved tonight regarding the subdivision and zoning ordinance. The zoning ordinance, there wouldn't be a change that would, there is a setback requirement from a pipeline that they would have to meet. That's in the 0 Y31i"0*6 City Council Meeting — January 9, 2006 zoning ordinance. They have accommodated that. There's other changes on the plat that they would have standing on that because by the time that's get published this plat would be through so they would have to make those changes on the subdivision itself. There is some extensive grading on the site, and then also the city is working. There's a drainage issue on the project itself too and I'll go through that for a minute. Again as I mentioned it was farmed. Heavily wooded. You're looking at some neighboring property. Looking at how this piece ties together. Part of what the staff looks at, I just want to kind of back out a little bit. One of the projects, this may be a little hard to see but part of what we look at is making sure all the pieces work together so actually engineering looked at how this property ties together. There was a question on the Bongaard property, which is on this side, how that would be served. There's a barn over here. Continuation of this temporary cul-de-sac. How that would serve. There is a bam there. Until such time that that property is subdivide, that would stay the way it is. The house could stay. It'd be a similar subdivision more than likely. The bam would probably go away so that was one of the things we looked at. It does meet all the lot width requirements. Again this kind of a new model that we'll be looking at. You saw the zone changes tonight. Included in your packet are the home plans itself. That's the direction we're moving in looking at some of these issues regarding configuration of home size on the lot. So the builder has, developer has supplied home plans. Specifically some of the smallest lots to show that they can meet the standard requirements because we do have a 90 foot frontage. Some of the developers now are moving up to actually 74 feet lot size so if you have 10 foot on either side, it'd be difficult to make that, so they've demonstrated they can meet all the requirements for their home placement plan. So the one issue we really struggled with was the retaining wall in and of itself. You can see along this red line, it might be a little hard to see but there's a retaining wall that goes up to 11 feet and back down. It's the only way that really this property can be subdivided. Some of the pieces that are left in the city as you know are the more challenging ones with some rolling topography that adds a lot of interest but also require some retaining walls. This retaining wall, the eastern side was actually reduced quite a bit so we worked with the developer to revise and reduce a lot of the retaining walls and their locations on the subject site itself. One of the other issues, there's a drainage problem ongoing for this property. There's a large drainage area that this will encompass. You can keep zooming. We're in this area. Here's Osprey through here. This is that larger drainage area that we'll be picking up, so the city had initiated through storm water management to do a ponding project, so we're partnering, because this pond serving this development will actually pick up a greater area than the subdivision itself. So the developer will be compensating the city for his portion of the drainage but we're also oversizing the pond and then when the other developments come in they'll pay for that oversizing, so that pond will be built to accommodate the rest of the development, and it's also picking up some of the drainage that's coming currently off of Osprey Lane. There will be no park and trail dedication. There will be fees taken at this time. Again the one issue with the street, there's existing 50 foot streets so we're making a transition between the Shenandoah plat and that vacation review. The new subdivision will accommodate the temporary pond will go away because we're creating a new pond. Again the vacation of existing right-of-way, we're making a transition between one end of 50 and 60, blending that and there's an existing utility. Again those are no longer needed and they'll be incorporated in the new plat so we need to vacate that and that's the portion you'll be holding the public hearing on. With that, the developer has responded to the staff in writing. We're working just trying to resolve some of the issues in good faith. With that, made significant changes from when it came in. Looking at the gas line. Accommodating that. L9 City Council Meeting — January 9, 2006 Trying to get the setback. That is accommodated the new 20 foot so working through all those issues, reducing the grading. Tree preservation and reduction of retaining walls so we have, they have sent us a letter as of last week and so noted, we're moving in the direction. We'd like to keep the conditions in there as tracking so when they come back for final plat those don't fall through the cracks, so with that we are recommending approval and then I guess at this point I'd ask you to open the public hearing regarding the vacation of the easements. With that I'd be happy to answer any questions that you have. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Why don't we go ahead and open the public hearing regarding the vacation of the easements based upon the staff report, and then we may get back to other issues regarding the rezoning request and subdivision of preliminary plat. So at this time, without objection I will open the public hearing with regarding to the issue so say with the vacation of the existing easements across the property as outlined in item 4(a) in our agenda. Anybody, any interested party please come forward to the podium and state your name and address. Mark Edman: Good evening members of the council. My name is Mark Edman. My address is 1572 Bluebill Trail. I actually back up to the pond or the drainage area you're talking about, and I guess I just want a little bit more clarification as to actually what is happening to that area and a little more I guess clarification as to is it getting larger? Is it getting smaller? Is it moving? Just kind of a little bit more from that standpoint. Also just as a note, the meeting that happened on the 6m, I got some kind of notice that said that meeting had been cancelled so I just, from that standpoint I don't know what happened but there was some confusion there as to whether or not that meeting was going on. So not that it really would have made that much difference but I wish I would have known because I didn't know that meeting was actually happening. So anyway, but if you could clarify the drainage for me. Kate Aanenson: Sure. I believe Lori has spoken to you too? Mark Edman: No. Not me. Kate Aanenson: Okay. I think to one or two of the neighbors. I'll let Paul interject too if he has some additional comments or even Todd Hoffman regarding the parks. There is a trail that exists that's going through that. Part of this is park property, so again as I indicated the City's working with an engineering firm to design ponding to accommodate runoff that's oversized, kind of an oversized pipe running through and causing erosion on Mr. Goers property so this will accommodate that, plus the Bongaard property so we're servicing a larger area which is the city's goal. So it's a 3 cell pond. There will be some vegetation that needs to be removed but this is the location. I know that was a concern of some of the neighbors that some of the trees will have to be removed. And it's Todd's goal also to try to, I believe try to tie up a trail through that to get access to the park in and of itself. But so there will be a deeper, bigger pond to accommodate that. Mark Edman: More space? Is it going to be larger or is it just going to be deeper? Kate Aanenson: Mostly deeper. You want to come up here and point to it Todd. 10 City Council Meeting — Jannuuary 9, 2006 • Mark Edman: That's the new one. Todd Hoffman: This pond will be enlarged here to the west. To this bow right here. The trees that are currently out there on the hole or in the berm right now are primarily going to go. Kate Aanenson: They have to go, yep. Todd Hoffman: They should not be there in the first place on that embankment, and then we're having a third trail connection put in off of the new road at this location. We have our trail connection to the park off of Bluebill. We currently have a connection off of Mallard Court. In the future we'll be working with the residents to connect all three of those with an asphalt trail to the base of the sliding hill to provide some more convenient access throughout the park system. Mark Edman: Okay, so the trees you're talking about, only the ones that are right along there. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Those will probably be removed with that. And part of that issue is too, is we need to get in to maintain that so. That pond. And one of the other issues that was brought up regarding vegetation was the sliding hill. Slowing people down as they move towards the backs of those lots. Looking at some of those issues too. Mayor Furlong: Does that answer your question? Mark Edman: I guess. Mayor Furlong: This is a public hearing. Interested parties, please come forward if you'd like to the podium. State your name and address please. Craig Renir: Hello, I'm Craig Renir. I live on Flamingo Drive. I actually live straight down on the other side of the pond. Right in here. I'm wondering, why do the berm and the trees need to be removed? What are the advantages of that? Because I'd like to keep the berm there as a visual barrier until they redevelop and... And also it brings in those squirrels and birds and things into the area. And why would it have to be removed I guess. What are the advantages for removing a berm and trees? Mayor Furlong: Okay. It's a fair question. Would staff like to? Kate Aanenson: If we could save it and make the functionality work, we would but really to get the desired, you have to meet certain standards as far as slope and depth and to get it on that site, it's the only way it can be done. Craig Renir: I was wondering, I don't know if they can zoom on this. I guess we have the same out here. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Craig Renir: And here they actually, well you were saying they were moving this pond... 11 City Council Meeting — January 9, 2006 • Kate Aanenson: It's a temporary. That's correct. The temporary will go, right Craig Renir: And they'll be building a new pond. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Right now what's being done there right now is inadequate. We have horrible erosion problems through that property. It's inadequate. So again, we're serving a much larger. Part of this is picking up Lake Susan Hills. Part will pick up Bongaard's as it's eroding now and then this development itself, so again it's serving a regional area. That's why it needs to be so big. Craig Renir: How about you say you're moving a pond here at the end, a temporary pond as well as a new one. Kate Aanenson: That temporary pond is inadequate in size and capacity. Craig Renir: Well I understand but where is the new pond going to be? This pond is already here. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, it's going to be reshaped. Craig Renir: Okay... Kate Aanenson: Correct, and then there'll be two other ones that go there, yeah. Todd Hoffman: And one will go down here. Craig Renir: This pond is here. Todd Hoffman: That's here. That's here. This is the new one that's going to be built. These two will be reshaped and enlarged. Craig Renir: Do you have a topographical map or an aerial? Kate Aanenson: That's what this is. Craig Renir: Yeah the aerial map, this is the flood zone already. All this area. And why wouldn't you not build the new pond to an area that's already lower and a flood zone now? See actually there's a break ... pond here reaches this corner and this is all low land. Every spring this all floods the way it is and then carries down the creek... Kate Aanenson: We'll take a look at it. Craig Renir: I'm just wondering if you put the wall here, a berm and put an additional pond here. 12 City Council Meeting — January 9, 2006 • Kate Aanenson: ...it's very complex as far as... Right, that's what we're trying to solve. There's an existing pond there. We'll look at it. Craig Renir: But a lot of, I don't know, the bean is something I think we can talk to, I know you need a. I also understood the pond's over 6 feet deep. Is that true? Kate Aanenson: Right. Craig Renir: This pond, they're saying to go deeper with it. I believe the pond here is 6 feet... Kate Aanenson: Well, it's also the integrity of that pond isn't functioning as it should be either so. Craig Renir: Well actually the house, we have 3 pipes coming into it now and one leading out. Todd Hoffman: The outlet structure's failed on that, isn't it? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Todd Hoffman: Yeah. Kate Aanenson: If you look at what's going, I don't want to get really technical but if you look at what's going through right now, it's about 100 cubic feet per second. We're trying to reduce that down to like 99, so we're reducing the volume so you need more capacity to make the pond as big as we can on that site so that's the goal. And we're working with the consultant. I believe Lori has walked it, physically looked at the best we can. We certainly can revisit that and. Mayor Furlong: In terms of the design and. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Correct. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor if I could step in here. I think we should probably look at the overall development itself and as it relates to the ponding, I think we should sit down with the neighborhood and talk about some alternatives and discuss the overall construction of these. I think we had some informational meetings and unless they've messed up on our notice or something there and sit down with the neighborhood so they feel comfortable what's going on there. But if, I think we can do that in the next couple of weeks and get the feedback and bring the pond section back to the council. But there definitely needs to be some more communication done here. Craig Renir: Well one thing I noticed that, and I don't know if you walked it or not but, where the outlet is for the pond, there's actually one of the sheet of rock, the paper they use for settling the retention in construction over the outlet. Which greatly reduces flow so we do have a high flow of water coming into it. It just goes over the berm without the pipe. I guess those are all that point or issues with this pond... 13 City Council Meeting — January 9, 2006 Kate Aanenson: It takes too much water too quickly. It doesn't hold it back. That's part of the goal of the storm water management is to hold it on site so it doesn't have the velocity of causing that erosion as it goes to the site. Todd Gerhardt: You're not seeing the erosion around the pond. The erosion is occurring farther down where the tree section is. Is where you're seeing the erosion occur. And the reason that the erosion is occurring down there is that, as Kate has mentioned, it's taking so much water out of there. There needs to be a new outlet installed. Craig Renir: Okay. Well another thing, issue here too is this drain tile running down this property line. Which has been washed out. Todd Gerhardt: Yes, and I was out on the site. I saw it. The pipe separated and you've got erosion going there. That's another problem but if that pipe was still connected, the outlet of the pipe further down into the woods, if you go to the southerly of the Goers property, you had extensive erosion problem down there that we spent several weeks of trucking debris out of there. Kate Aanenson: We cleaned up the site once this summer. Craig Renir: I was just wondering if another, over the berm we put another retention pond there and then had it to a level where the excess would be piped out across the whole area even the bottom of the park, ...gully there even. Instead of just making a larger pipe through there. Todd Gerhardt: Could be an option. Like I said, I think we need to sit down with you to kind of explain how they came up with this design and then, you know if you've got some other suggestions I think we'll listen to you and see if they can incorporate them. And definitely if we're going to lose trees in this area, I've walked the area, maybe we can go back in and re - landscape some of those areas that we're losing some trees. Craig Renir: I mean I realize the trees right now are small. Todd Gerhardt: Yeah, they're ash or. Craig Renir: Well they grow in the flood zone, that's why. Todd Gerhardt: Yep, they like water. Craig Renir: ...is what's going to happen to the bottom of the area that... farmed? Todd Gerhardt: Yeah, I think we're planning on going in there and revegetating that area. Closer to where the pipe blew out. Put some longer prairie grasses in that area. Craig Renir: I was just wondering if it was just going to become you know mowed parkland again. 14 City Council Meeting — January 9, 2006 • Todd Gerhardt: No. Todd Hoffman: Majority will be planted in long grass prairie. There will be just a small, little eyebrow that will be green grass at the bottom of the hill, and then beyond that, the majority of that will be long grass prairie. Craig Renir: Okay. Well I appreciate it, thank you. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Todd Gerhardt: If we could get both of your name and number and we'll sit down with you or any of your neighbors that are concerned and talk about the pond construction. Craig Renir: Okay, thank you very much. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Anybody else that would like to comment during the public hearing with regard to the proposed vacation of the easements? I see a few people wiggling. Chris Amack: Good evening. I'm Chris Amack at 8633 Alisa Court and I'm actually pretty excited about it. I don't know a whole lot but again I missed the meeting. I was going to go but I also got an announcement something was cancelled so I don't know if it was my fault or what it was but, this backs right up into my property. My property's right here. I guess my biggest concern would be the erosion. Absolutely right. It's very severe. I've got a retaining wall and some landscaping that's been done and it's, that whole lower level I can't even put grass in basically. It's when it rains it's, you're basically not walking back there for you know a good week and a half. So as we look at putting a house down there, is there, are we going to elevate the land and if so, what happens to that water? Does it come back onto mine. Mayor Furlong: That's a fair question. Kate Aanenson: It should positively flow back towards the street. Towards the catch basin there. I don't have the elevation but we can check with him on that information. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Kate Aanenson: It's sheet flowing to the catch basin in the street. I don't have the sheet, do you want to look at that Paul? Paul Oehme: Sure. Mayor Furlong: So that will get graded? Kate Aanenson: Yeah, there's a catch basin out in the street so it's sheet flowing towards. Mayor Furlong: With the grading that will, with the grading of those lots. 15 City Council Meeting — Jan• 9, 2006 Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Alright. Anyone else who would like to speak at the public hearing, please come forward. Okay, seeing nobody. Is there a motion to close the public hearing. Councilman Lundquist moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded to close the public hearing. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The public hearing was closed. Mayor Furlong: Let's move on now. With regard to, there obviously are some issues that were raised here this evening by the residents that we need to address. Mr. Gerhardt, I agree with your idea. Is that, I didn't hear necessarily objections to the vacation. It was where's the water going to go? Obviously we need to come up with a good design there based upon a variety of factors. So does that preclude us given that, again maybe this is a question for Mr. Knutson. The motion on the vacation was conditioned upon the final plat of this development so if we act tonight on that vacation, if that's a desire, do we need to wait for the pond to be redesigned I guess is my question, if there is any more design needed. Or bring just that issue back? I'm sorry. Kate Aanenson: I believe the pond. Mayor Furlong: It is conditioned upon approval of the final plat so nothing's going to happen until these are all in place. Kate Aanenson: ... if I can just jump in but I guess what we would recommend, if it's okay with the council, before it comes back for final plat that we have the neighborhood meeting and we would commit to do that. ...make it a condition... Mayor Furlong: I think we can do that sooner rather than later. Yeah, there were some good issues raised and I think we need to get that information discussed and, as well. So okay. Roger Knutson: But as far as adopting a resolution of the vacation as presented, I don't see any issues in delaying that unless staff does. Mayor Furlong: Because of the condition that it's contingent upon final plat. Roger Knutson: Right. Final plat. No final plat. No vacation. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Todd Gerhardt: And if we need a different easement, we can address that on the final plat. Mayor Furlong: Between preliminary and final. If that's where it goes. Now there may be other reasons that we want to pull. Kate Aanenson: Just for the edification of those people that are concerned, it is condition 29 that was added and that talked about the regional pond. Again we're doing a regional pond. We're 16 City Council Meeting — January 9, 2006 designing it because it's going to serve more than this. As I indicated before the developer is responsible for their portion that they're contributing to it and then as the rest of the development goes in, but then we can just add something on that number 29. That neighborhood meeting be held prior to final plat regarding the pond. If that makes sense. Mayor Furlong: And perhaps you raise, besides a neighborhood meeting, there may be additional activities that take place prior to that design as well. So the conditions provide protection as well of this design. Okay. Let's bring it back then. Is there additional, Ms. Aanenson is there anything additional that you want to present with regard to the overall project? The rezoning or the. Kate Aanenson: Not at this time. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Alright. Are there any questions for staff at this time with regard to this project? Councilwoman Tjomhom: I have some. Mayor Furlong: Councilwoman Tjomhom. Councilwoman Tjomhom: This is for Kate. If you go back to the map and the temporary cul- de-sac. Temporary means obviously it will be used someday for another development, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Councilwoman Tjomhom: And with that development, would that entrance, would they use the same entrance that this development is using? Kate Aanenson: Yeah, we actually ... it is a condition on there. That that cul-de-sac be extended I the future. Councilwoman Tjomhom: I've been here once too many times. Kate Aanenson: ...but this would tie back across, tie back across so we would put that in over to serve the Bongaard property if and when that developed, but we have to provide them adequate access. If you look at the topography of this property, this area, this is north here. If you can zoom in on this. It's a little hard to read but it's very challenging topography. This area down here really it's in the Bluff Creek Overlay. The southern part of the Goers property. You've got the ravine that we talked about with the erosion as it goes through there. So really you can't subdivide this bottom part soil types so you really have to take the development and bring it back over, tie it back in Audubon. So as part of what we do as planners, we have to provide access. We can't landlock somebody so we always sit down and work through those issues, so we've looked at a way to provide access to the property to the west. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Okay. 17 City Council Meeting — Jan 9, 2006 • Mayor Furlong: And I guess that access point, one is the southern point of this new road that's being developed and the other is. Kate Aanenson: Alisa Lane. Mayor Furlong: What's the name of that road? Kate Aanenson: Alisa. Alisa Lane... Mayor Furlong: ... so you'd have to loop around. Any other questions? Any questions from others? Ms. Aanenson, on the southern portion of this property, down closer to Lyman, is anything being done at this time? Kate Aanenson: No. Actually it's, the Goers will keep that house there. It does have access via Lyman. Because of the topography and the grades, it'd be difficult to further subdivide that. Again as a part of that it's adjacent. The parcel next to it is right in the Bluff Creek Overlay District so. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Nothing at this time. Thank you. Any other questions for staff? Is the applicant here? Is there any issues that you'd like to address to the council as well? Brent Hislop: Good evening. My name is Brent Hislop with Plowshares Development. Mayor Furlong: Good evening. Brent Hislop: I think Kate's explained the key items. As you have discussion I'd be glad to answer specific questions or one of our engineers will. No comments at this time. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Thank you. Any questions for the applicant? Okay. I'll bring it back to council for discussion. Any discussion on this? On any or all of these 3 items. Councilman Lundquist: Mr. Mayor, just to comment on the pond. Seems to be the concern so need to get that. As far as Kate, when you're talking about a condition of approval, I don't know that, because this is a regional pond and the developer will do their piece and we'll do our piece. I guess if we added as a condition that will inspire the developer to keep pushing us but I'm not sure that's necessarily the right spot. Not really the developer's issue. I mean it's really a city issue, not a developer issue so I'm not sure that I would favor adding that as a condition but somehow I guess, since we're on the record that just make sure that that gets done and obviously the developer will participate in that discussion but not really in favor of adding that as a condition of approval of the plat and burden them with that. Mayor Furlong: Help me understand with regard to creating a pond down there? Councilman Lundquist: Well it's a regional pond so it's not, I mean it's more than Stonefield development so, adding that condition that the developer puts that neighborhood meetings 1E City Council Meeting — January 9, 2006 together and runs that and does all that is really more of a city, because it's a regional pond, that's more of a Paul and Kate thing and Lori than a Plowshares. Mayor Furlong: But the issue of creating ponding for stormwater management for this development is there, as well as creating a regional pond. Councilman Lundquist: Correct. Mayor Furlong: It gives the opportunity to do that. But in terms of the process of talking to the neighbors, making sure issues are addressed on the regional component of it. Councilman Lundquist: Yep, that's a city responsibility. Mayor Furlong: And the city can facilitate that and get that done. As well as. Kate Aanenson: Yeah but it's all the regional problem. Mayor Furlong: Right. Kate Aanenson: So far, yeah. So in that sense we said, you have to provide ponding. We were ahead of this. We recognized when we had our super event that we had, as it's already been discussed tonight, a blow out in some drain tile and some severe erosion down there, so we were already being proactive and doing some design work up there, so we're making it bigger, so you're right. It's not all their burden. We're putting a majority of that over sizing on our property but we have design constraints. We certainly want to educate the residents... design and see if there's minor modifications as the City Manager's indicated and if there's landscaping that we can do to enhance that. Mitigate that, we certainly want to get that input. Whether you put it in here a condition or not, we've committed to do that so. Todd Gerhardt: Mr. Mayor, council members. The role that the developer would play on this is where exactly those future drainage and utility easements are going to go. They're kind of the front person in establishing those and we've got to make sure where we need them. Where they work. Don't impact their development so they're a party to this and so they're kind of the one that we have to vacate the old easements and establish the new ones. Probably on a portion of your property, or Plowshares development, and some on our's so, that's the role that I see Plowshares playing in this. And that we would coordinate with the neighborhoods. Bring them into City Hall and explain how the construction of the ponds would be done. What would happen to the berm. What the landscaping plan would look like, probably after the ponds are constructed. That's how I view the next 2 weeks to occur. Mayor Furlong: I think, and since we're talking about the pond, Councilman Lundquist brought it up. Condition 29 talks about an alternative if the pond is not built. Clearly it's the objective here to build a regional pond, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: That's correct, that's our goal to solve a problem. Right. 19 • 0 City Council Meeting —January 9, 2006 Mayor Furlong: Okay. Alright. Kate Aanenson: Again our policy has been to go where we have those opportunities to get the best use of our dollars and this is an opportunity. A majority of our property of a developer that's coming forward can expand the project and solve the problem. A bigger problem. Regional policy. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Councilman Lundquist: My point, I think we're going, it's the right thing to do. We need to get it done. My point was that I want city staff to drive that process and lead that process with obviously the developer participating a significant amount, but not that they take a lead on that. That we take a lead on that. Mayor Furlong: That's fine. Okay. Any other thoughts or discussions on the proposed rezoning or subdivision? Councilman Lundquist, no? Councilman Lundquist: No. Mayor Furlong: Anything? Councilman Peterson: Nor do I. Councilwoman Tjomhom: No. Councilman Labatt: Kate a couple questions on the location of that pipeline. I'm trying to look at this cross section on the grading. Kate Aanenson: Actually the pipeline comes, oops we're not on. So again this is north. Osprey. This is the street. This is the pipeline coming through. Through here, so the one lot that would be most impacted, we actually had them show a house plan that would fit on that lot. So that would be the lot with the additional 20 foot setback. Councilman Labatt: And where is that lot on the big plan? Kate Aanenson: It's Lot 4. Councilman Labatt: Right there, okay. So that house is just pushed to the north. Kate Aanenson: Actually the orientation would be this way so, it's this lot. So they met that new standard. Councilman Labatt: Okay. And the depth of that pipeline. Kate Aanenson: This one. This is Lot 4, Block 1. Oh I'm sorry. It's this lot. So this is the pipeline though right through here. 20 City Council Meeting — J• 9, 2006 • Councilman Labatt: Okay. And what's the current depth right now of that pipeline? Kate Aanenson: Is it 4 1h? Gas pipeline. Brent Hislop: Depth of the pipe? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Brent Hislop: About 3 to 4 feet. Kate Aanenson: About 3 to 4 feet, yep. It's pretty shallow. Councilman Labatt: And after the grading's done, the proposed grade ... is put in there, it will actually be a little deeper. Curtis Neft: The maximum allowed is 8 feet deep. And that's where we're at... Kate Aanenson: So that'd be the highest point of the hill at the top. Councilman Labatt: So between the road and the pipeline, it will be 8 feet? Curtis Neft: Correct. Kate Aanenson: And there's less grading as you get towards the end. Councilman Labatt: Okay, that's all I had. Just wanted. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Well I think my comments overall, I think it's a good project and it's one again where I think the city staff and the developer have worked well together to come up, to address some problems that exist. Try to make improvements. Use this as an opportunity. Also plan for the development of the properties around it in terms of being able to extend this street and loop it back around. And also deal with a number of issues surrounding our park and the other neighborhoods, so overall I think it's a good project and congratulate everybody that works on it. Clearly there's some more information to be shared and ideas to be discussed with regard to that pond and I'm glad that we'll be taking care of that over the next few weeks as well to get that done so. If there are any other comments or discussion points? If not, we have three items here. I don't know that we need to separate those for any reason so if there's a desire to keep them together in the form of a motion, we can certainly, I would certainly entertain that at this time. If somebody would like to make a motion. I think they're in order. Councilman Lundquist: There's two. The third one. Mayor Furlong: The third one is item (a) which is the vacation. 21 City Council Meeting — Jan• 9, 2006 • Councilman Peterson: We can make the motion relevant to what is submitted in the staff report and that might be the most prudent way to go through it. I'd certainly offer that as a motion. Mayor Furlong: Okay. That'd be items 4(a) and (b) within the staff report, including all the conditions there. Councilman Lundquist: 1 through 29. Councilman Peterson: Yeah. Councilman Lundquist: Second. Roger Knutson: (a), (b) and (c)? Councilman Peterson: Yes. Mayor Furlong: (a), (b) and (c). Okay. That motion is made and seconded. Is there any discussion or questions on the motion? Seeing none we'll proceed with the vote. Resolution #2006-04: Councilman Peterson moved, Councilman Lundquist seconded to approve a resolution vacating the existing storm water ponding easement, street, drainage and utility easement and drainage and utility easement as defined on the attached vacation description and contingent upon City Council approval of the final plat. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Councilman Peterson moved, Councilman Lundquist seconded to approve Planning Case #05-37 for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A2 to Single Family Residential for the Stonefield Subdivision as shown on plans stamped "Received November 18, 2005". All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Councilman Peterson moved, Councilman Lundquist seconded to approve to approve the preliminary plat for Subdivision Case #05-37 for Stonefield for 30 lots and 1 outlot with a right-of-way width variance, as shown on the plans stamped `Received November 18, 2005', subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will be required to meet the existing site runoff rates for 10 -year and 100 -year, 24-hour storm events. The proposed enlargement of the existing stormwater pond must be designed to meet the City's minimum standards and coordinated and approved by the City Water Resources Coordinator. 2. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations and a full-size drainage map must be submitted with the final plat for staff review and approval. 3. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood 22 City Council Meeting — J • 9, 2006 • level. 4. Staff recommends that Type II silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, be used adjacent to the existing wetland, existing creek area, and around the proposed pond. In addition, tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. Erosion control blankets are recommended for all of the steep 3:1 slopes with an elevation change of eight feet or more. 5. All plans must be signed by a registered Civil Engineer in the State of Minnesota. 6. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPGA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health, Carver County and the Williams Pipe Line Company. 7. The developer must obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. 8. On the utility plan: a. Show all the proposed storm sewer pipe type, size and class. b. Show the sanitary sewer pipe slope and class. c. Show watermain pipe class (C900). d. Add a storm sewer schedule. e. Show the existing storm sewer between Lots 1 & 2, Block 1 within the center of the 20 - foot utility easement. f. Show the stormwater manholes rim and invert elevations. g. Add a note to remove the temporary pond outlet control structure. h. The last street -accessible storm manhole discharging to the stormwater pond must be manhole with sump. i. Add a note: any connection to an existing structure must be core drilled. j. Extend the storm sewer farther to the south along the proposed street. k. Remove Lots 7 and 8 backyard storm sewer and add a storm sewer along the property line between Lots 4 and 5 and between Lots 8 and 9 block 4. 9. On the grading plan: a. Show Type II silt fence adjacent to wetland, pond, creeks, etc. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Use class 5 storm sewer in the roadway; revise the note under general grading and drainage notes accordingly. d. Extend the Swale between Lots 1 and 2, Block 4 farther to the east. 10. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. In addition, 23 City Council Meeting - January 9, 2006 • encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. 11. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,955.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,525.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees will be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. 12. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 13. Any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. 14. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. 15. The developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and construction of the lift station and forcemain and any associated costs. 16. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 17. Add a "dead-end road" sign at the cul-de-sac. 18. On the plat, show all existing and proposed street names. 19. Add City Detail Plate Nos. 1001, 1002, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1009, 2001, 2101, 2109, 2110, 2201, 2204, 3101, 3102, 3104, 3106, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5200, 5203, 5204, 5206, 5214, 5215, 5216, 5217, 5221, 5232, 5234, 5240, 5241, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A and 5313. 20. Show the street lights and a stop sign on the plans. 21. Submit public utility plans and profile for staff review. 22. City Forester's Conditions: a. A minimum of two overstory trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. b. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. 24 City Council Meeting — J•ary 9, 2006 c. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. d. Tree preservation on site shall be according to tree preservation plans dated 10/14/05. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 23. In the absence of parkland dedication, it is recommended that Stonefield pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final platting. At today's rate, these fees would total $120,000 (30 lots x $4,000). Additionally, the applicant is required to construct the neighborhood asphalt trail connector to the property line as depicted on their preliminary plan submittals. 24. Water Resource Coordinator's Conditions: a. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetland D. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. b. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. c. The applicant shall work with the City's consultant to accommodate regional and site- specific storm water needs. d. The approximate location and extent of drain tile shall be shown on the plans. The applicant shall provide details as to whether the tile line will be removed, abandoned in place or remain. If the tile is to remain, the flow from the tile shall be accommodated in the design of the storm water management plan. e. The applicant shall provide rate control and storm water treatment to reduce off-site impacts. To provide a low -gradient means for controlling rate and volume, the applicant shall consider cooperating with the City to construct a wetland in the rear portions of any number of Lots 1-8, Block 3. In the event that the applicant is interested in pursuing wetland construction for banking purposes, this planning shall be integrated with the City's consultant's storm water infrastructure planning. f. Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) shall be provided over all existing wetlands, storm water infrastructure and storm water ponds. g. The developer asserts that, due to the steep grade in the southern portion of the property, custom grading would not save any additional trees. In addition, the developer maintains that the slope of the road and the location of the retaining wall make custom grading lots impractical. If the developer demonstrates to the satisfaction of staff that custom grading 25 9 City Council Meeting — January 9, 2006 0 for their typical house pad would not result in additional significant tree preservation, mass grading of this area may be approved. h. The existing outlet structure of Pond A shall be removed and replaced in accordance with the City's standard detail. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) shall be provided for the pond. i. The portion of the silt fence that runs from the pipeline easement through Lot 7, Block 3 shall be moved upslope to the west by 30 to 60 feet to more clearly define the grading limits. The area of property between the silt fence and the gully and property line shall be seeded and mulched to control weeds and get a desirable cover crop in areas that were recently farmed. J. A temporary basin shall be constructed in the vicinity of Lots 6 and 7, Block 3. The temporary sediment basin shall be installed prior to disturbing upslope area. A temporary perforated riser and stable emergency overflow (EOF) for the basin shall be installed; details shall be included in the plan. The basin shall be properly sized for the watershed area, according to NPDES requirements (i.e. The basins must provide storage below the outlet pipe for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2 -year, 24-hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shall the basin provide less than 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe from each acre drained to the basin). k. Chanhassen Type 2 silt fence shall be provided for the perimeter of the site up to Lot 10, Block 3. From there, Type 1 may be used. Silt fence shall be shown on the plans around Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. Curbside inlet controls are needed; Wimco type or ESS type (or approved similar protection) inlet controls shall be used. Curbside inlet protection shall be provided for existing inlets adjacent to the site exit on Osprey Lane. City standard inlet protection details 5302 and 5302A shall be included in the plans. The proposed rear yard catch basin protection shall be revised; Wimco type, ESS type or equal must be used. The proposed silt fence shall be installed with additional rock around Chanhassen type 1 silt fence. in. The plans shall be revised to show energy dissipation for the flared end section on Lot 7, Block 3. n. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Tvne of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days 26 City Council Meeting — Jaary 9, 2006 9 These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. o. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. p. In order to fund the maintenance and expansion of the BC -P4.10 storm water pond and construction of additional capacity, the costs will be allocated among the benefiting properties. The total cost of materials and construction will be divided by the number of acres in the resulting subwatershed. The City will be responsible for the acres contributing from land already developed, park land and land to be developed in the future (e.g., the Bongaard parcel). The developer will be responsible for the acres contributing from their development. If, for any reason, the regional storm water facility is not constructed, the developer will be responsible for providing storm water quality and quantity management on the subject property and paying Surface Water Management connection charges in accordance with City Code. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $65,364. q. In conjunction with the BC -P4.10 storm water ponding project, land in addition to the land shown in Outlot A may be required. At this time, the estimated amount of land is approximately 0.5 acres. The developer and the City will seek to agree upon the terms of the use of land for ponding should additional land be required. The developer, if required, shall provide additional land for ponding. 25. Fire Marshall Conditions: a. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be either removed from site or chipped. b. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. c. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. d. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure 27 City Council Meeting — Jan• 9, 2006 • that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. e. Fire hydrant spacing is acceptable. f. Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 26. Building Official Conditions: a. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. b. Demolition permits must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site. c. The developer must submit a list of proposed street names for review and approval prior to final plat of the property. d. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. e. Separate sewer and water services must be provided each lot. L Existing wells and on-site sewage treatment systems on the site must be abandoned in accordance with State Law and City Code. 27. The retaining walls shall be maintained by a Homeowners Association. 28. The City shall not be responsible for maintenance of stone water infrastructure on Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block 3" 29. In the event that the regional pond project is not constructed, the applicant has proposed the installation of a second outlet structure on Pond A. In that event the existing outlet structure that is failing must also be replaced. The cost of a new outlet structure to replace the existing failing structure would be borne by the City, but the replacement would be done by the applicant. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Furlong: Thank you everyone. And thank you to the residents too that came out and spoke this evening. Drainage and utility easements are often non -issues so I'm glad that people came and spoke because I think we'll end up with a better project afterwards so thank you very much. For your involvement and interest. PU 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Stonefield Subdivision #05-37 On December 6, 2005, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of a Preliminary Plat to Subdivide 17.63 acres into 30 single- family lots and 1 outlot with Variances, Stonefield. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed development which was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned A-2, Agricultural Estate District. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential — Low Density (1.2 — 4.0 units per net acre). 3. The legal description of the property is attached as Exhibit A. 4. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse effects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) effects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; b) The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the City's comprehensive plan; C) The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d) The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; !CANNED e) The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; f) The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and g) The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. 2. Lack of adequate roads. 3. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. Variances. The City Council may grant a variance from the regulations contained in this chapter as part of the plat approval process following a finding that all of the following conditions exist: a) The hardship is not a mere inconvenience. b) The hardship is caused by the particular physical surroundings, shape or typographical conditions of the land. c) The conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally applicable to other property. d) The granting of the variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of this chapter, the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. 6. The planning report #05-35 SUB/Planning Case 05-35, dated December 6, 2005, prepared by Sharmeen AI-Jaff, et al, is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat with variances. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 6`s day of December, 2005. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMIVUSSION BY: ri Uli Sacchet, Chairman A • • EXHIBIT A That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the following described line and its northerly and southerly extensions; Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 04 minutes 49 seconds West, bearing assumed, along the South line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 790.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 1 degree 57 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of 460.00 feet; thence North 18 degrees 32 minutes 33 seconds East, a distance of 330.00 feet; thence North 52 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 638.57 feet; thence North 1 degree 57 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of 150.59 feet to a point on the North line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter distant 156.07 feet Easterly of the Northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter as measured along said North line and there terminating. D That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, described as follows, to -wit: The north 375.00 feet lying Westerly of the following described line, to -wit: Beginning at a point in the North line of said Southwest Quarter of Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) distant 849.31 feet West of the Northeast comer thereof, thence Southwesterly deflecting 64 degrees 42 minutes 04 seconds from West to South from said North line, a distance of 163.19 feet; thence Southerly deflecting to the left 32 degrees 35 minutes 37 seconds a distance of 125.62 feet; thence Southwesterly deflecting to the right 22 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds a distance of 302.23 feet; thence Southerly to the northwest comer of the East 290.75 feet of the West 484.2 feet of the South 539.7 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) as measured along the West and East lines of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4); thence South parallel with the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter to the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) and there terminating, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota. Outlot A, Shenandoah Ridge, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the County Recorder, Carver County, Minnesota. g:tplant2005 planning casest05-37 stonefield (goers ptopeny)\findings of fact.doc 3 CITY OF CIIANIIASSEN 7700 Markel Boulevard PO Boz 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952227.1100 Fax: 952,227,1110 49 January 17, 2006 I& Nathan Franzen Plowshares Development, Inc. 1851 Lake Drive West, Suite 550 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Nathan: • os -:Y7 This letter is to formally notify you that on January 9, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council adopted the following: Building Inspections REZONING Phone: 952.227.1180 - Fax: 952.227.1190 "The City Council approves Planning Case #05-37 for Rezoning from Agricultural Engineering Estate District, A-2, to Single Family Residential, for the Stonefield Subdivision, as PFaxe9�2271170 shown on plan stamped `Received November 18, 2005'. " Finance PREL RVE NARY PLAT Phone: 952.227.1140 sewer sizing calculations and a full-size drainage map must be submitted with Fax: 952 227.1110 the final plat for staff review and approval. Fax: 952.227.1310 "The City Council approves the preliminary plat for Subdivision Case #05-37 for Park A Recreation Stonefield for 30 lots and 1 outlot with a right-of-way width variance, as shown on Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 the plans stamped `Received November 18, 2005' and as revised in the staff report, Fax: 952.2271110 subject to the following conditions: Aecrea0on Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard 4. Staff recommends that Type 11 silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, be used Phone: 952.227.1400 1. The applicant will be required to meet the existing site runoff rates for 10 -year Fax: 952.227.1404 and 100 -year, 24-hour storm events. The proposed enlargement of the Planning s existing stormwater pond must be designed to meet the City's minimum Natural Resources standards and coordinated and approved by the City Water Resources Phone: 952.2271130 Coordinator. Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 2. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm 1591 Park Road sewer sizing calculations and a full-size drainage map must be submitted with Phone: 952.227.1300 the final plat for staff review and approval. Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center 3. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the Phone: 952.2271125 public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands Fax: 952.2271110 up to the 100 -year flood level. Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 4. Staff recommends that Type 11 silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, be used adjacent to the existing wetland, existing creek area, and around the proposed pond. In addition, tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. Erosion control blankets are recommended for all of the steep 3:1 slopes with an elevation change of eight feet or more. 5. All plans must be signed by a registered Civil Engineer in the State of Minnesota. ;CANNED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gnat place to live, work, and play. Plowshares Developmentic. • Stonefield January 17, 2006 Page 2 6. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health, Carver County and the Williams Pipe Line Company. 7. The developer must obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. 8. On the utility plan: a. Show all the proposed storm sewer pipe type, size and class. b. Show the sanitary sewer pipe slope and class. c. Show watermain pipe class (C900). d. Add a storm sewer schedule. e. Show the existing storm sewer between Lots 1 & 2, Block 1 within the center of the 20 - foot utility easement. L Show the stormwater manholes rim and invert elevations. g. Add a note to remove the temporary pond outlet control structure. h. The last street -accessible storm manhole discharging to the stormwater pond must be manhole with sump. i. Add a note: any connection to an existing structure must be core drilled. j. Extend the storm sewer farther to the south along the proposed street. k. Remove Lots 7 and 8 backyard storm sewer and add a storm sewer along the property line between Lots 4 and 5 and between Lots 8 and 9 block 4. 9. On the grading plan: a. Show Type II silt fence adjacent to wetland, pond, creeks, etc. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Use class 5 storm sewer in the roadway; revise the note under general grading and drainage notes accordingly. d. Extend the swale between Lots 1 and 2, Block 4 farther to the east. 10. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. In addition, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. 11. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,955.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,525.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees will be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. 12. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. Plowshares Developments. • Stonefield January 17, 2006 Page 3 13. Any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. 14. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. 15. The developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and construction of the lift station and forcemain and any associated costs. 16. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 17. Add a "dead-end road" sign at the cul-de-sac. 18. On the plat, show all existing and proposed street names. 19. Add City Detail Plate Nos. 1001, 1002, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1009, 2001, 2101, 2109, 2110, 2201, 2204, 3101, 3102, 3104, 3106, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5200, 5203, 5204, 5206, 5214, 5215, 5216, 5217, 5221, 5232, 5234, 5240, 5241, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A and 5313. 20. Show the street lights and a stop sign on the plans. 21. Submit public utility plans and profile for staff review. 22. City Forester's Conditions: a. A minimum of two overstory trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. b. The developer shall be responsible. for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. c. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. d. Tree preservation on site shall be according to tree preservation plans dated 10/14/05. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 23. In the absence of parkland dedication, it is recommended that Stonefield pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final platting. At today's rate, these fees would total $120,000 (30 lots x $4,000). Additionally, the applicant is required to construct the neighborhood asphalt trail connector to the property line as depicted on their preliminary plan submittals. Plowshares Development, Pc. • Stonefield January 17, 2006 Page 4 24. Water Resource Coordinator's Conditions: a. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetland D. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. b. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. c. The applicant shall work with the City's consultant to accommodate regional and site- specific storm water needs. d. The approximate location and extent of drain tile shall be shown on the plans. The applicant shall provide details as to whether the tile line will be removed, abandoned in place or remain. If the tile is to remain, the flow from the tile shall be accommodated in the design of the storm water management plan. e. The applicant shall provide rate control and storm water treatment to reduce off-site impacts. To provide a low -gradient means for controlling rate and volume, the applicant shall consider cooperating with the City to construct a wetland in the rear portions of any number of Lots 1-8, Block 3. In the event that the applicant is interested in pursuing wetland construction for banking purposes, this planning shall be integrated with the City's consultant's storm water infrastructure planning. f. Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) shall be provided over all existing wetlands, storm water infrastructure and storm water ponds. g. The developer asserts that, due to the steep grade in the southern portion of the property, custom grading would not save any additional trees. In addition, the developer maintains that the slope of the road and the location of the retaining wall make custom grading lots impractical. If the developer demonstrates to the satisfaction of staff that custom grading for their typical house pad would not result in additional significant tree preservation, mass grading of this area may be approved. h. The existing outlet structure of Pond A shall be removed and replaced in accordance with the City's standard detail. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) shall be provided for the pond. The portion of the silt fence that runs from the pipeline easement through Lot 7, Block 3 shall be moved upslope to the west by 30 to 60 feet to more clearly define the grading limits. The area of property between the silt fence and the gully and property line shall be seeded and mulched to control weeds and get a desirable cover crop in areas that were recently farmed. j. A temporary basin shall be constructed in the vicinity of Lots 6 and 7, Block 3. The temporary sediment basin shall be installed prior to disturbing upslope area. A Plowshares Development• . • Stonefield January 17, 2006 Page 5 temporary perforated riser and stable emergency overflow (EOF) for the basin shall be installed; details shall be included in the plan. The basin shall be properly sized for the watershed area, according to NPDES requirements (i.e. The basins must provide storage below the outlet pipe for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2 -year, 24-hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shall the basin provide less than 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe from each acre drained to the basin). k. Chanhassen Type 2 silt fence shall be provided for the perimeter of the site up to Lot 10, Block 3. From there, Type 1 may be used. Silt fence shall be shown on the plans around Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. Curbside inlet controls are needed; Wimco type or ESS type (or approved similar protection) inlet controls shall be used. Curbside inlet protection shall be provided for existing inlets adjacent to the site exit on Osprey Lane. City standard inlet protection details 5302 and 5302A shall be included in the plans. The proposed rear yard catch basin protection shall be revised; Wimco type, ESS type or equal must be used. The proposed silt fence shall be installed with additional rock around Chanhassen type 1 silt fence. m. The plans shall be revised to show energy dissipation for the flared end section on Lot 7, Block 3. n. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. o. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed p. In order to fund the maintenance and expansion of the BC -P4.10 storm water pond and construction of additional capacity, the costs will be allocated among the benefiting properties. The total cost of materials and construction will be divided by the number of acres in the resulting subwatershed. The City will be responsible for the acres contributing from land already developed, park land and land to be developed in the future (e.g., the Bongard parcel). The developer will be responsible for the acres contributing from their development. If, for any reason, the regional storm water facility Plowshares Development., • Stonefield January 17, 2006 Page 6 is not constructed, the developer will be responsible for providing storm water quality and quantity management on the subject property and paying Surface Water Management connection charges in accordance with City Code. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $65,364. q. In conjunction with the BC -P4.10 storm water ponding project, land in addition to the land shown in Outlot A may be required. At this time, the estimated amount of land is approximately 0.5 acres. The developer and the City will seek to agree upon the terms of the use of land for ponding should additional land be required. The developer, if required, shall provide additional land for ponding. 25. Fire Marshall Conditions: a. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be either removed from site or chipped. b. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. c. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. d. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant tc Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. e. Fire hydrant spacing is acceptable. f. Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. Plowshares Development, Pc. • Stonefield January 17, 2006 Page 7 26. Building Official Conditions: a. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. b. Demolition permits must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site. c. The developer must submit a list of proposed street names for review and approval prior to final plat of the property. d. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. e. Separate sewer and water services must be provided each lot. f. Existing wells and on-site sewage treatment systems on the site must be abandoned in accordance with State Law and City Code. 27. The retaining walls shall be maintained by a Homeowners Association. 28. The City shall not be responsible for maintenance of stone water infrastructure on Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block 3. 29. In the event that the regional pond project is not constructed, the applicant has proposed the installation of a second outlet structure on Pond A. In that event, the existing outlet structure that is failing must also be replaced. The cost of a new outlet structure to replace the existing failing structure would be borne by the City, but the replacement would be done by the applicant." Final plat documents must be submitted to the City three weeks prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 952.227.1134 or e-mail at saljaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Sincerely, Sharmeen Al-Jaff Senior Planner cc: William and Vicky Goers gAplan\2005 planning c es\05-37 stonefieW (goers property)\prelim plat letter of approvalAm Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Web Site: http//www.rileypurgatorybluffcreek.org February 1, 2006 Mr. Nathan Franzen Plowshares Development, LLC 1851 Lake Drive West; #550 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Permit #2005-35: Stonetield: Chanhassen Dear Mr. Franzen: Legal Advisor: Krebsbach and Haik, Ltd. 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4320 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612 333-7400 Fax: 612 333-6959 Engineering Advisor: Barr Engineering 4700 West 77th Street Minneapolis, MN 55435 952 832-2600 Fax: 952 832-2601 REC"-YED FEB 1 2006 CITY OF CHAN"ASSEN The Board of Managers of the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District has reviewed the plans and grading and land alteration permit application as submitted to the District for the Stonefield development in Chanhassen. The Managers approve of the grading and land alteration permit subject to the following conditions: 1. All conditions as outlined in the attached General Provisions are applicable. If you have any questions regarding the conditions of the District's permit, please call us at 952-832-2600. Sincereeely., obert C. Obermeyer? BARR ENGINEERING CO. Engineers for the District oved by the Board of Managers /RVEY-PURG0bRY/MUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Date: c: Paul Haik C/ Mark Dillon Lori Halx Curt Neft ::0DMA\PCD0CS\D0CS\246754\l Board of Managers Howard Peterson Mark Dillon Conrad Fiskness Michael Casanova Erin Ahola Permit: #2005-35 Project Name: Stonefield: Chanhassen Approval Date: General Provisions 1. All erosion control measures shown on the plans must be installed prior to commencement of grading operations and be maintained until all areas altered on the site have been restored. If silt fence is used, the bottom flap must be buried and the maximum allowable spacing between posts is 4 -foot on center. All posts must be either 2" x 2" pine, hardwood, or steel fence posts. If hay bales are used, all bales must be staked in place and reinforced on the downstream side with snow fence. The silt fence must be orange in color, which will be more evident and easier to locate for removal at the completion of the project. 2. All areas altered because of construction must be restored with seed and disced mulch, sod, wood fiber blanket, or be hard surfaced within two weeks from the completion of construction or no later than October 15, 2006. 3. Upon completion of construction and restoration of areas disturbed, the permit applicant is responsible for the removal of all erosion control measures installed throughout the site. 4. Street sweeping must be undertaken and completed on an as -needed basis. S. At the entryway onto the site, a rock filter dike being a minimum of 2 feet in height and having maximum side slopes of 4:1 must be constructed. This rock filter dike will enable construction traffic to enter the site and also provide an erosion control facility. 6. The District must be notified in writing a minimum of 48 hours prior to commencement of construction. Upon receipt of this notification, a field inspection of the project site by the District's engineer will be undertaken to ensure that all erosion control measures have been properly installed. Construction cannot commence until this field inspection has been completed. 7. Upon completion of the project, the permit applicant is required to complete and submit the middle portion of the attached permit, indicating that the project has been completed. Upon receipt of this application, a field inspection of the site by the District's engineering advisor will be undertaken to ensure that all areas have been properly restored and that all erosion control measures throughout the project site have been removed. 8. The Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD), its officers, employees and agents review, comment upon, and approve plans and specifications prepared by permit applicants and their consultants for the limited administrative purpose of determining whether there is reasonable assurance that the proposed project will comply with the regulations and criteria of the RPBCWD and other state and federal agencies. The determination of the RPBCWD that issuance of this permit is appropriate was made in reliance on the information provided by the applicant. ::ODMA\PCDOCS\DOCS\296754\1 1 9. The grant of this permit shall not in any way relieve the permittee, its engineer, or other professional consultants of responsibility, nor shall it make the RPBCWD responsible for the technical adequacy of the engineer's or consultant's work. The grant of this permit shall not relieve the permittee from complying with all conditions and requirements of the permit, which shall be retained, by the permittee with the permit. 10. The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of federal, state, or local laws or regulations. 11. This permit is permissive only. No liability shall be imposed upon the RPBCWD or any of its officers, agents or employees, officially or personally, on account of the granting of this permit or on account of any damage to any person or property resulting from any act or omission of the permittee or any of its agents, employees, or contractors. 12. In all cases where the doing by the permittee of anything authorized by this permit shall involve the taking, using, or damaging of any property, rights or interests of any other person or persons, or of any publicly owned lands or improvements or interests, the permittee, before proceeding therewith, shall obtain the written consent of all persons, agencies, or authorities concerned, and shall acquire all necessary property, rights and interest. 13. This permit is not transferable. The permittee shall make no changes, without written permission previously obtained from the RPBCWD, in the dimensions, capacity, or location of any items of work authorized by this permit. 14. The permittee shall grant access to the site at all reasonable times during and after construction to authorized representatives of the RPBCWD for inspection of the work authorized by this permit. 15. This permit may be terminated by the RPBCWD at any time deemed necessary in the interest of public health and welfare, or for violation of any of the provisions of this permit, unless otherwise provided in the special provisions. 16. Construction work authorized under this permit shall be completed on or before date specified above. The permittee may, in writing, request that the RPBCWD extend the time to complete the project and shall state the reason for any requested extension. 17. If dewatering is required and sump pumps are used, all pumped water must be discharged through an erosion control facility prior to leaving the construction site. Proper energy dissipation must be provided at the outlet of the pump system. ::ODMA\PCDOCS\DOCS\246754\1 2 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 05-37 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, December 6, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers to Chanhass en C ity Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of thishearing istoconsiderarequest for Rezoning and Subdivision with Variances on property located at 1601 Lyman Boulevard - STONEFIELD. Applicant: Plowshares Development, LLC. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Sharmeen A1Jaff, Senior Planner Email _ Phone: 952-227. 1134 (PublishedintheChanhassenVillager on Thursday, November 24, 2005; No. 4560) Affidavit of Publication Southwest Suburban Publishing State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 33 1A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended /J//_ (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz Laurie A. Hartmann Subscribed and sworn before me on this 27 day o 2005 , GWEN M. RADUENZ a NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA My Commsslon b;:r=s:1 .31.2010 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $22.00 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $22.00 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $11.18 per column inch SCANNED 0 0 Affidavit of Publication Southwest Suburban Publishing State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly swom, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized COUNTIES agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: PLANNING CASE NO, 0537 NOTICE ISHEREBYGIVENthat the Chanhassen Planning (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal Commission will hold a public newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable laws, as hearing on Tuesday, November 15, amended. 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. Sy 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said this hearing is to consider a request Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of for Rezoning and Subdivision with Variances on property located at the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both 1601 Lyman Boulevard - inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition STONEFIELD. Applicant: and publication of the Notice: Plowshares Development, LLC. A plan showing the location of abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz the proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their Laurie A. Hartmann opinions with respect to this proposal. Sharmeen Al Jaff, Senior Planner Email- Subscribed and sworn before me on s4aff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227- n 1134 /jam{/ (Publishedinthe Chanhassen Villager 44440444 on Thursday, November 3,2005; No. this 2day of . 2005 4546) GWEN M. RADUENZ .x, NOTARY PUBLIC -WNNESOTA My C'Mssim Bpkes Jan. 31, 2010 Notary Public RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $22.00 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $22.00 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $11.18 per column inch SCANNED MY OF 7700 Market Boulevard PC Boz 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax 952.227 1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227,1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.2271130 Fax: 952.227 1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us IUIu•t:►ID hd TO: Sharmeen AL-Jaff, Senior Planner FROM: Mak Sweidan, Engineer j7 `� DATE: March 29, 2006 SUBJ: Final Plat Review of Stonefield - Project File No. 06-07 Upon review of the plans submitted by Westwood, Inc., dated February 7, 2006, I offer the following comments and recommendations: GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL The site area is about 17.60 acres and has tree cover over approximately 4.69 acres (27%) of the parcel with a variety of grade changes. The site elevations range from a high of 970± to a low of 912±. These severe elevation differences make it challenging to both develop and minimize grading on this site. The plans propose to grade about 80% of the site for 30 new house pads, a proposed street and enlarging an existing stormwater pond. The proposed grading will prepare the site for full basement and walk -out type house pads. Retaining walls are proposed throughout the site due to the severe elevation differences and to create the house pads. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. Retaining walls within drainage and utility easements must be minimized, however, staff understands that this may not be feasible, therefore, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. The existing site drainage is encompassed within almost one drainage area. Under existing conditions, the site drains from the north and west sides to the east to an existing wetland along the southeast side of the property line. Under developed conditions, the applicant is proposing to capture all of the street drainage, all of the front yard drainage, and some rearyard drainage from the lots on the west side interior lots. This stormwater will be conveyed via storm sewer to an existing pond in the northeast corner of the site for treatment. The existing stormwater pond was designed to treat much of the site drainage areas adjacent to the parcel from the north and northeast sides. Since the applicant is proposing to enlarge the existing stormwater pond to accommodate the additional drainage generated from the proposed site, the enlargement must be designed to City standards and coordinated and approved by the City's Water Resources Coordinator. The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Sharmeen Al-Jaff March 29, 2006 Page 2 Drainage and storm sewer sizing calculations for the site have been submitted and some changes must be made. The applicant is required to meet the existing site peak runoff rates for the 10 -year and 100 -year, 24-hour storm events. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood level. Proposed erosion control must be developed in accordance with the MPCA's best management practices. Staff recommends that Type II silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, to be used adjacent to the existing wetland, existing creek area, and around the pond. In addition, tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. Erosion control blankets are required for all 3:1 slopes with an elevation change of eight feet or more. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. The applicant should be aware that any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul mutes. Municipal water service is available to the site from Osprey Lane and sewer is available at the Bluebill Trail and Osprey Lane intersection. The water and sewer mains will be extended south from Osprey Lane to serve the site and stubbed at the southwest comer of the parcel for future extension to the west. Due to the topography of the site and the elevation of the existing sanitary sewer, the site can not be served by a gravity sanitary sewer system, therefore, a lift station is proposed between Lot 4, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 3. The lift station is not identified on the Trunk Sanitary Sewer System map, or in the capital improvement plan, therefore, the developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and installation of the lift station and forcemain. The lift station and forcemain must meet the City's minimum requirements. The developer is responsible for any additional work required to install the lift station and forcemain, including, but not limited to dewatering costs, grading, subgrade correction and signal tests. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2006 trunk hookup charge is $1,575.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,625.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Upon completion and final acceptance of the utility improvements, the City will own and maintain these utilities. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of Sharmeen Al-Jaff March 29, 2006 Page 3 credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. The developer must obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health and Carver County, Williams Pipe Line Company. Once the executed development contract, securities, fees and permits have been submitted, a preconstruction meeting must be held before grading and/or utility construction can begin. STREETS The proposed development lies east of Audubon Road and north of Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18), A -Minor Expander Arterials as identified on SRF Consulting Group Inc.'s Functional Classification Map. On September 29, 2005, City Council approved the Arterial Collector Fee which is $2,400/developable acre for residential development. All new developments along the Lyman Boulevard corridor are subject to this fee. The proceeds of this fee will fund the reconstruction of Lyman Boulevard between Audubon Road and Powers Boulevard. The Arterial Collector Fee is calculated as follows: 11.19 acres developable area x $2,400/acre = $26,856.00 The plans show Osprey Lane within two right-of-ways, 50 -foot and 60 -foot wide to match the existing right-of-way widths to the east and west. The developer proposes to raise the portion of Osprey Lane that abuts Stonefield by two feet to provide a safer vertical curve. The plans propose one full access to the site off of Osprey Lane from the north. The proposed public street complies with the minimum required right-of- way and pavement width. A temporary 90 -foot diameter cul-de-sac turnaround for emergency vehicles is proposed at the southwest end of the proposed street and a "Dead End Road" sign will be required. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF FINAL PLAT APPROVAL 1. The developer shall pay the $26,856.00 Arterial Collector Fee. 2. Approval of the final plat is contingent upon approval of final construction plans/specifications for the project along with the developer entering into a development contract with the City and supplying the necessary financial security and fees. Sharmeen AI-Jaff March 29, 2006 Page 4 RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION PLAN APPROVAL The proposed enlargement of the existing stormwater pond must be designed to meet the City's minimum standards and coordinated and approved by the City Water Resources Coordinator. 2. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations has been submitted for staff review and some minor revisions are still needed. 3. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood level. 4. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health, Carver County and the Williams Pipe Line Company. 5. The developer must obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. 6. On the utility plan: a. Add a note: All water services must be (1") Type K copper. b. Extend the storm sewer further to the south along the proposed Stonfield Lane to the end of the temporary cul-de-sac. c. All backyard catch basins must be built per City Detail Plate No. 3103. d. Add a catch basin at the north east comer of Lot 1, Block 4 along Osprey Lane or proposed Stonefield Lane. 7. On the grading plan, show the benchmark used for the site survey. 8. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. In addition, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. 9. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2006 trunk hookup charge is $1,575.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,625.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. Sharmeen Al-Jaff March 29, 2006 Page 5 10. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 11. Any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. 12. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. 13. The developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and construction of the lift station and forcemain and any associated costs. 14. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 15. Show the street lights every 300 feet, a stop sign at the street intersection and a Dead End sign at the cul-de-sac on the plans. 16. In lieu of Surface Water Management (SWAP) fees, the applicant shall abide by the terms of the Agreement for Stormwater Facilities Improvements between Plowshares Development, Inc. and the City of Chanhassen. 17. Due to the amount of fill required to reconstruct the section of Osprey Lane that abuts the Stonefield development, Osprey Lane must be closed to traffic for a period of time this summer. The City authorizes the closure of Osprey Lane from May 1, 2006 until July 31, 2006. The developer must notify in writing all properties within 500 feet of the development to inform the residents of the upcoming closure, the detour route and why the closure is necessary by April 17, 2006. "Road Closed" and detour signs must be posted a minimum of 10 days before the closure. Requests to extend the time of closure must be submitted in writing to the City Engineer for consideration. c: Paul Oehme, Public Works Director/City Engineer Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer g:tengtpmjmts\stonefieldVpr.doc Park & Recreation • o5-3-7 �c-1 Phone: 952.227.1120 Estate District, A-2, to Single Family Residential, for the Stonefield Subdivision, as Fax. 952.227.1110 MEMORANDUM Recreation Center TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Cl l l OF FROM: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner CgANAASSEN REZONING Fax: 952.227.1404 DATE: March 20, 2006 . 7700 Market Boulevard Stonefield for 30 lots and 1 outlot with a right-of-way width variance, as shown on PBox 147 Chanhassen, MNN55317 SUBJ: Stonefield Final Plat Approval, Plowshares pin Phone: 952.227.1125 Planning Case #05-37 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 1. The applicant will be required to meet the existing site runoff rates for 10 -year Fax. 952.227.1110 PROPOSAL SUMMARY Building Inspections existing stormwater pond must be designed to meet the City's minimum Phone: 952 227,1180 The developer is requesting final plat approval to subdivide 17.63 acres into 30 Fax: 952.227.1190 single-family lots and 1 outlot for Stonefield. The City has approved the Engineering development contract for the storm water pond and it is under construction. Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227,1170 ACTION REQUIRED Finance Phone. 952.227.1140 City Council approval requires a majority of City Council present. Fax: 952.227 1110 Park & Recreation BACKGROUND Phone: 952.227.1120 Estate District, A-2, to Single Family Residential, for the Stonefield Subdivision, as Fax. 952.227.1110 On January 9, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council adopted the following: Recreation Center 2310 Coulter PRELM11NARY PLAT Phone: 952.227.1400 Phone: 952227.14(10 REZONING Fax: 952.227.1404 "The City Council approves the preliminary plat for Subdivision Case #05-37 for Finding: This condition has been partially met. The condition will read "The proposed enlargement of the existing stormwater pond must be designed to meet the City's minimum standards and coordinated and approved by the City Water Resources Coordinator." soner The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A geat place to live, work, and play. "The City Council approves Planning Case #05-37 for Rezoning from Agricultural Planning a Natural Resources Estate District, A-2, to Single Family Residential, for the Stonefield Subdivision, as Phone: 952.227 1130 shown on plan stamped `Received November 18, 2005'." Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Worb PRELM11NARY PLAT 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 "The City Council approves the preliminary plat for Subdivision Case #05-37 for Fax: 952.227 1310 Stonefield for 30 lots and 1 outlot with a right-of-way width variance, as shown on Senior center the plans stamped `Received November 18, 2005' and as revised in the staff report, Phone: 952.227.1125 subject to the following conditions: Fax: 952.227.1110 Web site 1. The applicant will be required to meet the existing site runoff rates for 10 -year www.d.chanhassen.mn.us and 100 -year, 24-hour storm events. The proposed enlargement of the existing stormwater pond must be designed to meet the City's minimum standards and coordinated and approved by the City Water Resources Coordinator. Finding: This condition has been partially met. The condition will read "The proposed enlargement of the existing stormwater pond must be designed to meet the City's minimum standards and coordinated and approved by the City Water Resources Coordinator." soner The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A geat place to live, work, and play. Stonefield — Planning Ca3CNo. 05-37 • March 20, 2006 Page 2 2. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations and a full-size drainage map must be submitted with the final plat for staff review and approval. Finding: This condition has been revised to read "The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations have been submitted for staffs review. Some minor revisions are still required." 3. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood level. Finding: This condition still applies. 4. Staff recommends that Type II silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, be used adjacent to the existing wetland, existing creek area, and around the proposed pond. In addition, tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. Erosion control blankets are recommended for all of the steep 3:1 slopes with an elevation change of eight feet or more. Finding: This condition has been met. 5. All plans must be signed by a registered Civil Engineer in the State of Minnesota.. Finding: This condition has been met. 6. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPGA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health, Carver County and the Williams Pipe Line Company.. Finding: This condition still applies. 7. The developer must obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. . Finding: This condition still applies. 8. On the utility plan: a. Show all the proposed storm sewer pipe type, size and class. b. Show the sanitary sewer pipe slope and class. c. Show watermain pipe class (C900). d. Add a storm sewer schedule. e. Show the existing storm sewer between Lots 1 & 2, Block 1 within the center of the 20 - foot utility easement. ' Stonefield — Planning Calko. 05-37 March 20, 2006 Page 3 L Show the stormwater manholes rim and invert elevations. g. Add a note to remove the temporary pond outlet control structure. h. The last street -accessible storm manhole discharging to the stormwater pond must be manhole with sump. i. Add a note: any connection to an existing structure must be core drilled. j. Extend the storm sewer farther to the south along the proposed street. k. Remove Lots 7 and 8 backyard storm sewer and add a storm sewer along the property line between Lots 4 and 5 and between Lots 8 and 9 block 4. Finding: This condition has been met. 9. On the grading plan: a. Show Type H silt fence adjacent to wetland, pond, creeks, etc. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Use class 5 storm sewer in the roadway; revise the note under general grading and drainage notes accordingly. d. Extend the swale between Lots 1 and 2, Block 4 farther to the east. Finding: This condition has been partially met. 9.b. and 9.c. still apply. 10. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. In addition, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. . Finding: This condition still applies. 11. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,955.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,525.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees will be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. Finding: This condition has been revised to read "The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2006 trunk hookup charge is $1,575.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,625.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees will be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance." 12. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion.. Finding: This condition still applies. Stonefield - Planning Cato. 05-37 • March 20, 2006 Page 4 13. Any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. Finding: This condition still applies. 14. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. . Finding: This condition still applies. 15. The developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and construction of the lift station and forcemain and any associated costs. . Finding: This condition still applies. 16. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. . Finding: This condition still applies. 17. Add a "dead-end road" sign at the cul-de-sac. Finding: This condition still applies. 18. On the plat, show all existing and proposed street names.. Finding: This condition has been met. 19. Add City Detail Plate Nos. 1001, 1002, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1009, 2001, 2101, 2109, 2110, 2201, 2204, 3101, 3102, 3104, 3106, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5200, 5203, 5204, 5206, 5214, 5215, 5216, 5217, 5221, 5232, 5234, 5240, 5241, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A and 5313. . Finding: This condition has been met. 20. Show the street lights and a stop sign on the plans. Finding: This condition still applies but has been modified to read "Show the street lights at 300 foot intervals and a stop sign on the plans." 21. Submit public utility plans and profile for staff review. . Finding: This condition has been met. 22. City Forester's Conditions: ` 'Stonefield — Planning CONo. 05-37 • March 20, 2006 Page 5 a. A minimum of two overstory trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. b. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. c. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. d. Tree preservation on site shall be according to tree preservation plans dated 10/14/05. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. Finding: This condition still applies. 23. In the absence of parkland dedication, it is recommended that Stonefield pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final platting. At today's rate, these fees would total $120,000 (30 lots x $4,000). Additionally, the applicant is required to construct the neighborhood asphalt trail connector to the property line as depicted on their preliminary plan submittals. Finding: This condition still applies but has been modified to read "In the absence of parkland dedication, it is recommended that Stonefield pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final platting. At today's rate, these fees would total $174,000 (30 lots x $5,800). Additionally, the applicant is required to construct the neighborhood asphalt trail connector to the property line as depicted on their preliminary plan submittals." 24.Water Resource Coordinator's Conditions: a. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetland D. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. Finding: This condition still applies. b. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. Finding: This condition still applies. c. The applicant shall work with the City's consultant to accommodate regional and site- specific storm water needs. Finding: This condition has been met. Stonefield — Planning CI No. 05-37 • March 20, 2006 Page 6 d. The approximate location and extent of drain tile shall be shown on the plans. The applicant shall provide details as to whether the tile line will be removed, abandoned in place or remain. If the tile is to remain, the flow from the tile shall be accommodated in the design of the storm water management plan. Finding: This condition has been met. e. The applicant shall provide rate control and storm water treatment to reduce off-site impacts. To provide a low -gradient means for controlling rate and volume, the applicant shall consider cooperating with the City to construct a wetland in the rear portions of any number of Lots 1-8, Block 3. In the event that the applicant is interested in pursuing wetland construction for banking purposes, this planning shall be integrated with the City's consultant's storm water infrastructure planning. Finding: This condition no longer applies. f. Drainage and utility easements (minimum 20 feet in width) shall be provided over all existing wetlands, storm water infrastructure and storm water ponds. Finding: This condition has been met. g. The developer asserts that, due to the steep grade in the southern portion of the property, custom grading would not save any additional trees. In addition, the developer maintains that the slope of the road and the location of the retaining wall make custom grading lots impractical. If the developer demonstrates to the satisfaction of staff that custom grading for their typical house pad would not result in additional significant tree preservation, mass grading of this area may be approved. Finding: This condition has been met. h. The existing outlet structure of Pond A shall be removed and replaced in accordance with the City's standard detail. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) shall be provided for the pond. Finding: This condition still applies. i. The portion of the silt fence that runs from the pipeline easement through Lot 7, Block 3 shall be moved upslope to the west by 30 to 60 feet to more clearly define the grading limits. The area of property between the silt fence and the gully and property line shall be seeded and mulched to control weeds and get a desirable cover crop in areas that were recently farmed. Finding: This condition has been met. j. A temporary basin shall be constructed in the vicinity of Lots 6 and 7, Block 3. The temporary sediment basin shall be installed prior to disturbing upslope area. A temporary perforated riser and stable emergency overflow (EOF) for the basin shall be / Stonefield — Planning CIPNo. 05-37 • March 20, 2006 Page 7 installed; details shall be included in the plan. The basin shall be properly sized for the watershed area, according to NPDES requirements (i.e. The basins must provide storage below the outlet pipe for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2 -year, 24-hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shall the basin provide less than 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe from each acre drained to the basin). Finding: This condition still applies. k. Chanhassen Type 2 silt fence shall be provided for the perimeter of the site up to Lot 10, Block 3. From there, Type 1 may be used. Silt fence shall be shown on the plans around Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. Finding: This condition still applies. Curbside inlet controls are needed; Wimco type or ESS type (or approved similar protection) inlet controls shall be used. Curbside inlet protection shall be provided for existing inlets adjacent to the site exit on Osprey Lane. City standard inlet protection details 5302 and 5302A shall be included in the plans. The proposed rear yard catch basin protection shall be revised; Wimco type, ESS type or equal must be used. The proposed silt fence shall be installed with additional rock around Chanhassen type 1 silt fence. Finding: This condition still applies. m. The plans shall be revised to show energy dissipation for the flared end section on Lot 7, Block 3. Finding: This condition has been met. n. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Finding: This condition still applies. Stonefield — Planning Ca*No. 05-37 March 20, 2006 Page 8 o. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed Finding: This condition still applies. p. In order to fund the maintenance and expansion of the BC -P4.10 storm water pond and construction of additional capacity, the costs will be allocated among the benefiting properties. The total cost of materials and construction will be divided by the number of acres in the resulting subwatershed. The City will be responsible for the acres contributing from land already developed, park land and land to be developed in the future (e.g., the Bongard parcel). The developer will be responsible for the acres contributing from their development. If, for any reason, the regional storm water facility is not constructed, the developer will be responsible for providing storm water quality and quantity management on the subject property and paying Surface Water Management connection charges in accordance with City Code. At this time, the estimated total SWAP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $65,364. Finding: This condition has been revised to read "The developer shall abide by the agreement for Storm Water Facilities Improvements dated March 1, 2006, executed by the developer and the City of Chanhassen." q. In conjunction with the BC -P4.10 storm water ponding project, land in addition to the land shown in Outlot A may be required. At this time, the estimated amount of land is approximately 0.5 acres. The developer and the City will seek to agree upon the terms of the use of land for ponding should additional land be required. The developer, if required, shall provide additional land for ponding. Finding: This condition has been met. 25. Fire Marshall Conditions: a. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be either removed from site or chipped. Finding: This condition still applies. b. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of constriction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. Finding: This condition still applies. Stonefield — Planning CYNo. 05-37 • March 20, 2006 Page 9 c. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. Finding: This condition still applies. d. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. Finding: This condition still applies. e. Fire hydrant spacing is acceptable. Finding: This condition still applies. f. Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. Funding: This condition has been met. 26. Building Official Conditions: a. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. Finding: This condition still applies. b. Demolition permits must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site. Finding: This condition still applies. c. The developer must submit a list of proposed street names for review and approval prior to final plat of the property. Finding: This condition has been met. d. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. Finding: This condition still applies. e. Separate sewer and water services must be provided to each lot. Finding: This condition still applies. Stonefield — Planning CIINo. 05-37 • March 20, 2006 Page 10 f. Existing wells and on-site sewage treatment systems on the site must be abandoned in accordance with State Law and City Code. Finding: This condition still applies. 27. The retaining walls shall be maintained by a Homeowners Association. . Finding: This condition still applies. 28. The City shall not be responsible for maintenance of storm water infrastructure on Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block 3. Finding: This condition still applies. 29. In the event that the regional pond project is not constructed, the applicant has proposed the installation of a second outlet structure on Pond A. In that event, the existing outlet structure that is failing must also be replaced. The cost of a new outlet structure to replace the existing failing structure would be borne by the City, but the replacement would be done by the applicant." Finding: This condition still applies. FINAL PLAT The applicant is proposing to subdivide 17.63 Acres into 30 single-family lots and 1 outlot. The density of the proposed subdivision is 1.7 units per acre gross and 2.08 units per acre net after removing the roads and wetlands. All the lots exceed the minimum 15,000 square feet of area, with an average lot size of 20,939 square feet. The site is zoned Residential Single Family District (RSF). All of the proposed lots meet the minimum width and depth requirements of the RSF Zoning Ordinance. There is one outlot proposed on the site. This outlot will contain a sidewalk, storm pond and an existing pipe line. Lots 8 through 10, Block 3, abut a wetland. The ordinance requires all structures to maintain a 40 - foot setback from the outside edge of a wetland buffer strip. The ordinance also requires a buffer zone in addition to the wetland setback. A wetland buffer 16.5 feet in width must be maintained around the wetland. There is a numerical error on the plat for Lot 2, Block 1. The plat reflects a 89.74 foot frontage when the actual measurement is 90 feet Staff added a condition requiring correction of the error on the plat. Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. Stonefield — Planning Cao. 05-37 • March 20, 2006 Page 11 GRADING. DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL The site area is about 17.60 acres and has tree cover over approximately 4.69 acres (27%) of the parcel with a variety of grade changes. The site elevations range from a high of 970± to a low of 912±. These severe elevation differences make it challenging to both develop and minimize grading on this site. The plans propose to grade about 80% of the site for 30 new house pads, a proposed street and enlarging an existing stormwater pond. The proposed grading will prepare the site for full basement and walk -out type house pads. Retaining walls are proposed throughout the site due to the severe elevation differences and to create the house pads. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. Retaining walls within drainage and utility easements must be minimized, however, staff understands that this may not be feasible; therefore, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. The existing site drainage is encompassed within almost one drainage area. Under existing conditions, the site drains from the north and west sides to the east to an existing wetland along the southeast side of the property line. Under developed conditions, the applicant is proposing to capture all of the street drainage, all of the front yard drainage, and some rear yard drainage from the lots on the west side interior lots. This stormwater will be conveyed via storm sewer to an existing pond in the northeast corner of the site for treatment. The existing stormwater pond was designed to treat much of the site drainage areas adjacent to the parcel from the north and northeast sides. Since the applicant is proposing to enlarge the existing stormwater pond to accommodate the additional drainage generated from the proposed site, the enlargement must be designed to City standards and coordinated and approved by the City's Water Resources Coordinator. Drainage and storm sewer sizing calculations for the site have been submitted and some changes must be made. The applicant is required to meet the existing site peak runoff rates for the 10 - year and 100 -year, 24-hour storm events. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood level. Proposed erosion control must be developed in accordance with the MPCA's best management practices. Staff recommends that Type II silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, to be used adjacent to the existing wetland, existing creek area, and around the pond. In addition, tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. Erosion control blankets are required for all 3:1 slopes with an elevation change of eight feet or more. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. The applicant should be aware that any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. Stonefield — Planning CVNo. 05-37 • March 20, 2006 Page 12 UTILITIES Municipal water service is available to the site from Osprey Lane and sewer is available at the Bluebill Trail and Osprey Lane intersection. The water and sewer mains will be extended south from Osprey Lane to serve the site and stubbed at the southwest corner of the parcel for future extension to the west. Due to the topography of the site and the elevation of the existing sanitary sewer, the site can not be served by a gravity sanitary sewer system, therefore, a lift station is proposed between Lot 4, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 3. The lift station is not identified on the Trunk Sanitary Sewer System map, or in the capital improvement plan, therefore, the developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and installation of the lift station and forcemain. The lift station and forcemain must meet the City's minimum requirements. The developer is responsible for any additional work required to install the lift station and forcemain, including, but not limited to dewatering costs, grading, subgrade correction and signal tests. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2006 trunk hookup charge is $1,575.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,625.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Upon completion and final acceptance of the utility improvements, the City will own and maintain these utilities. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. The developer must obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPGA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health and Carver County, Williams Pipe Line Company. Once the executed development contract, securities, fees and permits have been submitted, a preconstruction meeting must be held before grading and/or utility construction can begin. STREETS The proposed development lies east of Audubon Road and north of Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18), A -Minor Expander Arterials as identified on SRF Consulting Group Inc.'s Functional Classification Map. On September 29, 2005, City Council approved the Arterial Collector Fee which is $2,400/developable acre for residential development. All new developments along the Lyman Boulevard corridor are subject to this fee. The proceeds of this fee will fund the reconstruction Stonefield — Planning CaVNo. 05-37 • March 20, 2006 Page 13 of Lyman Boulevard between Audubon Road and Powers Boulevard. The Arterial Collector Fee is calculated as follows: 11.19 acres developable area x $2,400/acre = $26,856.00 The plans show Osprey Lane within two right-of-ways, 50 -foot and 60 -foot wide to match the existing right-of-way widths to the east and west. The developer proposes to raise the portion of Osprey Lane that abuts Stonefield by 2 feet to provide a safer vertical curve. The plans propose one full access to the site off of Osprey Lane from the north. The proposed public street complies with the minimum required right-of-way and pavement width. A temporary 90 -foot diameter cul-de-sac turnaround for emergency vehicles is proposed at the southwest end of the proposed street and a "Dead End Road" sign will be required. Surface Water Management Fees The developer is cooperating with the City of Chanhassen to maintain and improve the regional storm water facilities on the Stonefield site and on the adjacent Power Hill Park property. The developer and the City have entered into a separate agreement that outlines the parameters of this cooperative effort. The developer is required to abide by the Agreement for Storm Water Facilities Improvements (March 1, 2006), executed by the developer and the City of Chanhassen. Other Agencies The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Department of Transportation) and comply with their conditions of approval. PARK DEDICATION I VA 9 The property is situated directly west of and shares a common border with Power Hill park. This neighborhood park was developed in approximately 1990 and features a large sliding hill, basketball court, playground, small park shelter and limited off-street parking. A significant elevation change exists between the top of Power Hill Park and the location proposed for the new homes in Stonefield. This will be a deterrent for some residents of the new subdivision as they attempt to visit the park. No additional parkland acquisition or dedication is recommended as a condition of this subdivision request. Full park fees in lieu TRAILS Many neighborhoods adjoining Power Hill Park gain access to the park from neighborhood trail connectors. The applicant has included such a connector in their submittal. The proposed location for the trail connector, within Outlot A, is acceptable to staff. Stonefield — Planning Calvo. 05-37 • March 20, 2006 Page 14 TREE PRESERVATION/LANDSCAPING Tree canopy calculations have been submitted for the Stonefield development. They are as follows: Total upland area (excluding wetlands) 17.60 ac. Baseline canopy coverage 27% or 4.69 ac. Minimum canopy coverage allowed 30% or 5.28 ac. Proposed tree preservation 7% or 1.25 ac. The applicant does not meet minimum canopy coverage allowed; therefore, the difference between the baseline and proposed tree preservation is multiplied by 1.2 to calculate the required replacement plantings. Difference in canopy coverage (4.69,tas) 149,846 SF or 3.44 ac. Multiplier 1.2 Total replacement 179,815 SF Total number of trees to be planted 165 trees The applicant also needs to make up the difference between the existing canopy coverage (4.69 ac) and the required canopy coverage (5.28 ac). Difference in canopy coverage 25,700 SF or .59 ac Number of trees to be planted 24 Total number of trees required 189 The applicant has proposed a total of 189 trees - 77 overstory trees, 32 ornamentals and 80 evergreens in their landscape plan. No bufferyards are required. The land uses of neighboring properties are similar. The applicant exceeds the recommended 105' of tree removal for wooded lots. Even with the use of extensive retaining walls, the amount of tree removal in the wooded area of the property exceeds minimum ordinance requirements. However, it is less than what could potentially be removed without the use of retaining walls. Staff recommends that alternatives to the proposed plan be thoroughly researched by the applicant. Possible solutions would include larger lots on the southern end, different home styles that are more sensitive to the topography and custom graded lots. Stonefield — Planning CaWo. 05-37 • March 20, 2006 Page 15 COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE - RSF DISTRICT ea Depth Setbacks: front, side, Wetland (ft) )b rear, wetland buffer Buffer (sq.ft.)Frontage setback (ft) Code 15,000 90 125 30, 10, 30, 40 16.5 Block 1 Lot 1 16,324 91.44 220.8 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 2 15,264 90.00 179.25 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Block 2 Lot 1 (Corner 15,200 92.37, 127.07 136.07 30/30, 10/10, N/A, N/A N/A Lot) Lot 2 15,123 99.01 153.03 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 3 19,952 81.94 @ Front Lot Line 170.07 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 90.00 @ Setback Line Lot 4 18,937 85.02 @ Front Lot Line 165.95 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 95.23 @ Setback Line Block 3' Lot 1 35,876 88.26 @ Front Lot Line 227.99 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 95.26 @ Setback Line Lot 2 25,931 90.00 250.51 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 3 23,568 105.48 266.44 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 4 23,995 104.33 296.75 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 5 26,253 90.00 291.70 30, 10, 30, 40 16.5 Lot 6 25,506 90.00 283.40 30, 10, N/A, 40 16.5 Lot 7 25,700 89.01 @ Front Lot Line 274.87 30, 10, N/A, 40 16.5 90 @ Setback Line Lot 8 25,348 78.51 @ Front Lot Line 225.21 30, 10, N/A, 40 16.5 90 @ Setback Line Lot 9 21,983 78.51 @ Front Lot Line 212.18 30, 10, 30, 40 16.5 90 @ Setback Line Lot 10 34,207 78.51 @ Front Lot Line 244.11 30, 10, 30, 40 16.5 90 @ Setback Line Lot 11 23,343 78.51 @ Front Lot Line 209.80 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 90 @ Setback Line Lot 12 17,596 86.74@ Front Lot Line 169.77 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 94.29 @ Setback Line Block 4 Lot 1 (Corner 15,104 96.22 127.88 30/30, 10110, N/A, N/A N/A Lot) Lot 2 15,616 92.09 174.36 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 3 21,205 138.65 213.43 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 4 23,769 130.07 223.37 1 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Stonefield — Planning CIPNo. 05-37 • March 20, 2006 Page 16 @ Meets 90 foot width at the building setback line. na — Not Applicable RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following motion: "The City Council grants final plat approval of Planning Case #05-37 for Stonefield for 30 lots and 1 outlot with a right-of-way width variance, as shown on the plans stamped `Received March 1, 2006', subject to the following conditions: The proposed enlargement of the existing stormwater pond must be designed to meet the City's minimum standards and coordinated and approved by the City Water Resources Coordinator. 2. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations have been submitted for staff's review and some minor revisions are still needed. 3. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood level. 4. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health, Carver County and the Williams Pipe Line Company. Setbacks: front, side, Setbacks: Wetland (sq. f[) Frontage (ft) rear, wetland buffer Buffer setback (ft) Code 15,000 90 125 30, 10, 30, 40 16.5 Lot 5 18,727 90.00 208.08 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 6 18,180 86.25 @ Front Lot Line 187.04 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 90.12 @ Setback Line Lot 7 16,924 85.9 @ Front Lot Line 174.45 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 90.13 @ Setback Line Lot 8 16,450 87.93 @ Front Lot Line 175.57 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A 90.10 @ Setback Line Lot 9 16,498 90.00 183.31 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 10 17,245 90.00 191.61 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 11 17,754 98.14 196.50 30, 10, 30, N/A N/A Lot 12 20,608 261.54 197.23 30, 10/10, N/A, N/A N/A Outlet A 57,521 Right -of- 97,580 way TOTAL 628,186 @ Meets 90 foot width at the building setback line. na — Not Applicable RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following motion: "The City Council grants final plat approval of Planning Case #05-37 for Stonefield for 30 lots and 1 outlot with a right-of-way width variance, as shown on the plans stamped `Received March 1, 2006', subject to the following conditions: The proposed enlargement of the existing stormwater pond must be designed to meet the City's minimum standards and coordinated and approved by the City Water Resources Coordinator. 2. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations have been submitted for staff's review and some minor revisions are still needed. 3. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood level. 4. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health, Carver County and the Williams Pipe Line Company. Stonefield —Planning Ca@ No. 05-37 • March 20, 2006 Page 17 5. The developer must obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. 6. On the utility plan: a. Add a note: All water services must be (1") Type K copper. b. Extend the storm sewer further to the south along the proposed Stonfield Lane to the end of the temporary cul-de-sac. c. All backyard catch basins must be built per City Detail Plate No. 3103. d. Reroute the storm sewer from between Lots 3 & 4, Block 2 to the south side of Lot 4. e. Add a catch basin at the north east corner of Lot 1, Block 4 along Osprey Lane. 7. On the grading plan: a. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. b. Use class 5 storm sewer in the roadway; revise the note under general grading and drainage notes accordingly. 8. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. In addition, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. 9. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2006 trunk hookup charge is $1,575.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,625.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees will be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. 10. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 11. Any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. 12. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. . 13. The developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and construction of the lift station and forcemain and any associated costs. 14. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. Stonefield — Planning Cas? No. 05-37 • March 20, 2006 Page 18 15. Show the street lights every 300 feet, a stop sign at the street intersection and a Dead End sign at the cul-de-sac on the plans. 16. City Forester's Conditions: a. A minimum of two overstory trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. b. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. c. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. d. Tree preservation on site shall be according to tree preservation plans dated 10/14/05. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 17. In the absence of parkland dedication, it is recommended that Stonefield pay full park dedication fees at the rate in force upon final platting. At today's rate, these fees would total $174,000 (30 lots x $5,800). Additionally, the applicant is required to construct the neighborhood asphalt trail connector to the property line as depicted on their preliminary plan submittals. 18. Water Resource Coordinator's Conditions: a. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around Wetland D. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. b. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge. c. The existing outlet structure of Pond A shall be removed and replaced in accordance with the City's standard detail. A stable emergency overflow (EOF) shall be provided for the pond. d. A temporary basin shall be constructed in the vicinity of Lots 6 and 7, Block 3. The temporary sediment basin shall be installed prior to disturbing upslope area. A temporary perforated riser and stable emergency overflow (EOF) for the basin shall be installed; details shall be included in the plan. The basin shall be properly sized for the watershed area, according to NPDES requirements (i.e. The basins must provide storage below the outlet pipe for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2 -year, 24-hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shall the basin provide less than 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe from each acre drained to the basin). Stonefield — Planning Ca�No. 05-37 • March 20, 2006 Page 19 e. Chanhassen Type 2 silt fence shall be provided for the perimeter of the site up to Lot 10, Block 3. From there, Type 1 may be used. Silt fence shall be shown on the plans around Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. f. Curbside inlet controls are needed; Wimco type or ESS type (or approved similar protection) inlet controls shall be used. Curbside inlet protection shall be provided for existing inlets adjacent to the site exit on Osprey Lane. City standard inlet protection details 5302 and 5302A shall be included in the plans. The proposed rear yard catch basin protection shall be revised; Wimco type, ESS type or equal must be used. The proposed silt fence shall be installed with additional rock around Chanhassen type 1 silt fence. g. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. h. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. i. The developer shall abide by the agreement for Storm Water Facilities Improvements dated March 1, 2006, executed by the developer and the City of Chanhassen. 19. Fire Marshall Conditions: a. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be either removed from site or chipped. b. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. A fire apparatus access road shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.2.3. c. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadway allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. Stonefield — Planning Ca3Z No. 05-37 • March 20, 2006 Page 20 d. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. e. Fire hydrant spacing is acceptable. 20. Building Official Conditions: a. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. b. Demolition permits must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site. c. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. d. Separate sewer and water services must be provided to each lot. e. Existing wells and on-site sewage treatment systems on the site must be abandoned in accordance with State Law and City Code. 21. The retaining walls shall be maintained by a Homeowners Association. . 22. The City shall not be responsible for maintenance of storm water infrastructure on Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block 3. 23. In the event that the regional pond project is not constructed, the applicant has proposed the installation of a second outlet structure on Pond A. In that event, the existing outlet structure that is failing must also be replaced. The cost of a new outlet structure to replace the existing failing structure would be borne by the City, but the replacement would be done by the applicant. 24. The developer shall pay the $26,856.00 Arterial Collector Fee. 25. Approval of the final plat is contingent upon approval of final construction plans/specifications for the project along with the developer entering into a development contract with the City and supplying the necessary financial security and fees. 26. Due to the amount of fill required to reconstruct the section of Osprey Lane that abuts the Stonefield development, Osprey Lane must be closed to traffic for a period of time this summer. The City authorizes the closure of Osprey Lane from May 15, 2006 until July 31, 2006. The developer must hold a neighborhood meeting by May 1, 2006 with all properties within 500 feet of the development to inform the residents of the upcoming closure, the detour route and why the closure is necessary. "Road Closed' and detour signs must be Stonefield — Planning CONo. 05-37 • March 20, 2006 Page 21 posted a minimum of 10 days before the closure. Requests to extend the time of closure must be submitted in writing to the City Engineer for consideration. 27. The frontage on Lot 2, Block 1, shall be corrected to reflect 90 feet." ATTACHMENTS 1. Agreement for Storm Water Facilities Improvements. 2. Final Plat. gAplan\2005 planning ca \05-37 stone5eld (goes property)Vmal plat.dm CITY OF MEMORANDUM TO: Sharmeen AL-Jaff, Senior Planner 770o Market Po ox 147evard FROM: Mak Sweidan, Engineer Chanhassen, MN 55317 Upon review of the plans submitted by Westwood, Inc., dated February 7, 2006, I DATE: March 29, 2006 Administration challenging to both develop and minimize grading on this site. The plans propose to Phone: 952.227.1100 GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL Fax: 952.227, 1110 SUBJ: Final Plat Review of Stonefield - Project File No. 06-07 Building Inspections The site area is about 17.60 acres and has tree cover over approximately 4.69 acres Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Upon review of the plans submitted by Westwood, Inc., dated February 7, 2006, I offer the following comments and recommendations: Engineering challenging to both develop and minimize grading on this site. The plans propose to Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL Finance The site area is about 17.60 acres and has tree cover over approximately 4.69 acres Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax 952.227.1110 (27%) of the parcel with a variety of grade changes. The site elevations range from a high of 970± to a low of 912±. These severe elevation differences make it Park & Recreation challenging to both develop and minimize grading on this site. The plans propose to Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 grade about 80% of the site for 30 new house pads, a proposed street and enlarging an Recreation Center existing stormwater pond. The proposed grading will prepare the site for full 2310 Coulter Boulevard basement and walk -out type house pads. Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.2271404 Retaining walls are proposed throughout the site due to the severe elevation Planning 6 differences and to create the house pads. Any retaining wall over four feet in height Natural Resources must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building PFax:9522.27.1110 Department must be obtained. Retaining walls within drainage and utility easements Fax 952.227.1110 must be minimized, however, staff understands that this may not be feasible, Public works therefore, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a 1591 Parkpublic easement. Phone: 952.221.17.1 300 Fax: 952.227.1310 The existing site drainage is encompassed within almost one drainage area. Under Senior Center existing conditions, the site drains from the north and west sides to the east to an Phone: 952.227,1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 existing wetland along the southeast side of the property line. Under developed conditions, the applicant is proposing to capture all of the street drainage, all of the Web site front yard drainage, and some rearyard drainage from the lots on the west side interior www.ci.ctunhassen.mn.us lots. This stormwater will be conveyed via storm sewer to an existing pond in the northeast corner of the site for treatment. The existing stormwater pond was designed to treat much of the site drainage areas adjacent to the parcel from the north and northeast sides. Since the applicant is proposing to enlarge the existing stormwater pond to accommodate the additional drainage generated from the proposed site, the enlargement must be designed to City standards and coordinated and approved by the City's Water Resources Coordinator. The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gnat place to live, work, and play. w Sharmeen Al-Jaff March 29, 2006 Page 2 Drainage and storm sewer sizing calculations for the site have been submitted and some changes must be made. The applicant is required to meet the existing site peak runoff rates for the 10 -year and 100 -year, 24-hour storm events. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood level. Proposed erosion control must be developed in accordance with the MPCA's best management practices. Staff recommends that Type II silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, to be used adjacent to the existing wetland, existing creek area, and around the pond. In addition, tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. Erosion control blankets are required for all 3:1 slopes with an elevation change of eight feet or more. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. The applicant should be aware that any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. UTILITIES Municipal water service is available to the site from Osprey Lane and sewer is available at the Bluebill Trail and Osprey Lane intersection. The water and sewer mains will be extended south from Osprey Lane to serve the site and stubbed at the southwest comer of the parcel for future extension to the west. Due to the topography of the site and the elevation of the existing sanitary sewer, the site can not be served by a gravity sanitary sewer system, therefore, a lift station is proposed between Lot 4, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 3. The lift station is not identified on the Trunk Sanitary Sewer System map, or in the capital improvement plan, therefore, the developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and installation of the lift station and forcemain. The lift station and forcemain must meet the City's minimum requirements. The developer is responsible for any additional work required to install the lift station and forcemain, including, but not limited to dewatering costs, grading, subgrade correction and signal tests. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2006 trunk hookup charge is $1,575.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,625.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Upon completion and final acceptance of the utility improvements, the City will own and maintain these utilities. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of Sharmeen Al-Jaff March 29, 2006 Page 3 credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. The developer must obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPGA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health and Carver County, Williams Pipe Line Company. Once the executed development contract, securities, fees and permits have been submitted, a preconstruction meeting must be held before grading and/or utility construction can begin. STREETS The proposed development lies east of Audubon Road and north of Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18), A -Minor Expander Arterials as identified on SRF Consulting Group Inc.'s Functional Classification Map. On September 29, 2005, City Council approved the Arterial Collector Fee. The proceeds of this will fund the construction of Arterial Collectors within the City. The developer has negotiated a $2,000/acre rate for this project, therefore the fee is: 11.19 acres developable area x $2,000/acre = $22,380.00 The plans show Osprey Lane within two right-of-ways, 50 -foot and 60 -foot wide to match the existing right-of-way widths to the east and west. The developer proposes to raise the portion of Osprey Lane that abuts Stonefield by two feet to provide a safer vertical curve. The plans propose one full access to the site off of Osprey Lane from the north. The proposed public street complies with the minimum required right-of- way and pavement width. A temporary 90 -foot diameter cul-de-sac turnaround for emergency vehicles is proposed at the southwest end of the proposed street and a "Dead End Road" sign will be required. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF FINAL PLAT APPROVAL On September 29, 2005, City Council approved the Arterial Collector Fee. The proceeds of this will fund the construction of Arterial Collectors within the City. The developer has negotiated a $2,000/acre rate for this project, therefore the fee is: 11.19 acres developable area x $2,000/acre = $22,380.00 2. Approval of the final plat is contingent upon approval of final construction plans/specifications for the project along with the developer entering into a Sharmeen A]-Jaff March 29, 2006 Page 4 development contract with the City and supplying the necessary financial security and fees. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION PLAN APPROVAL 1. The proposed enlargement of the existing stormwater pond must be designed to meet the City's minimum standards and coordinated and approved by the City Water Resources Coordinator. 2. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations has been submitted for staff review and some minor revisions are still needed. Drainage and utility easements must be dedicated on the final plat over the public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100 -year flood level. 4. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Watershed District, MN Department of Health, Carver County and the Williams Pipe Line Company. 5. The developer must obtain written permission from the Williams Pipe Line Company to perform the proposed grading within the easement. The developer is responsible for complying with all conditions of the Williams Pipe Line Company and assumes full responsibility for work performed within this easement. 6. On the utility plan: a. Add a note: All water services must be (1") Type K copper. b. Extend the storm sewer further to the south along the proposed Stonfield Lane to the end of the temporary cul-de-sac. c. All backyard catch basins must be built per City Detail Plate No. 3103. d. Add a catch basin at the north east comer of Lot 1, Block 4 along Osprey Lane or proposed Stonefield Lane. 7. On the grading plan, show the benchmark used for the site survey. 8. Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil engineer and a permit from the City's Building Department must be obtained. In addition, encroachment agreements will be required for any retaining wall within a public easement. 9. The underlying property has not been assessed for sewer or water improvements. The 2006 trunk hookup charge is $1,575.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078.00 per unit for watermain and the SAC fee is $1,625.00 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Sharmeen Al-Jaff March 29, 2006 Page 5 Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. 10. All disturbed areas must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 11. Any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate property owner. 12. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. 13. The developer is responsible for 100% of the cost and construction of the lift station and forcemain and any associated costs. 14. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 15. Show the street lights every 300 feet, a stop sign at the street intersection and a Dead End sign at the cul-de-sac on the plans. 16. In lieu of Surface Water Management (SWMP) fees, the applicant shall abide by the terns of the Agreement for Stormwater Facilities Improvements between Plowshares Development, Inc. and the City of Chanhassen. 17. Due to the amount of fill required to reconstruct the section of Osprey Lane that abuts the Stonefield development, Osprey Lane must be closed to traffic for a period of time this summer. The City authorizes the closure of Osprey Lane from May 1, 2006 until July 31, 2006. The developer must notify in writing all properties within 500 feet of the development to inform the residents of the upcoming closure, the detour route and why the closure is necessary by April 17, 2006. "Road Closed' and detour signs must be posted a minimum of 10 days before the closure. Requests to extend the time of closure must be submitted in writing to the City Engineer for consideration. Paul Oehme, Public Works Director/City Engineer Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer g:\eng\projmts\stonefieid\fpr.dm TRANSMITTAL Date: March 1, 2006 W Re: Stonefield Final Plat Westwood File 2005 -1114 -CO To: Sharmeen Al-Jaff City of Chanhassen 6900 City Center Dr. P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 From: Curt Neft Items: No Description 1 Final Plat Application 4 Final Landscape Plans 4 Final Grading Plans 4 Final Street and Utility Plans 1 Storm Sewer Design and Drainage Map Purpose: Other (see remarks) Wertwood Professional Services 7699 Anaq,am Drive Eden Praire, MN 55344 . Ria 952-932-5150 Faz 952-932-5822 TOLL FRET 1-88&932-5150 .mai, wpsDwesTwoodps..om www.westwoodp.mm Remarks: Please find the attached plans for the final plat application. Nathan will be delivering a check for the $250.00 fee. The plans, specifications, legal descriptions and estimates will be emailed to you. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 952-906-7405 Thank you Delivery: Mail CITY OF RECEIVED SSEN MAR 0 1 2006 CHANHASSEN PLF.NNING DEPT cc: File, Nathan Franzen (Plowshares Development) TWIN CITIESMETRD R. CLOUD B IRERD SCANNED MIN I CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 — (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Applicant Name and Address: Plowshares Development, Inc. 1 1 Ranh. en ut Contact: Nathan Franzen P • ' . 1: 1: cl ... -. �. .. .. .- •.u -r Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Interim Use Permit Non -conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development* Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Site Plan Review* X Subdivision* Final Plat Planning Case No. C5 3 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAR 0 1 2006 CHANHASSEN PUNNING DEPT Owner Name and Address: William and Vickv GeI 1601 Lyman Blvd. ftanhac,Pn, MN F517 Contact: Wi l l i am Gnprs Phone:952-448-6.sg3 Fax: Email: Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Variance Wetland Alteration Permit Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign** - $75 + $100 Damage Deposit X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost*** - $50 CUP/SPR/VAC/VAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds - $450 Minor SUB TOTAL FEE $ '_q.SU� 1C I Ct; sS / I An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81W X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 (*.tif) format. ** Applicant to obtain notification sign from City of Chanhassen Public Works at 1591 Park Road and install upon submittal of completed application. $100 damage deposit to be refunded to applicant when sign is returned following City Council approval. *** Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED PROJECT NAME: Stonefield and Goer's P LOCATION: See Attached LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TOTALACREAGE: 17.63+ -and 5.23+ - WETLANDS PRESENT: X YES NO PRESENTZONING: Rural REQUESTED ZONING: Residential Single Family PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: Agri 1 cultural REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: Residential REASON FOR REQUEST: Final Plat This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I`�� Signature &tApplicant Signature of Fee Owner 3.I.ot9 Date Date SCANNED GAplan\forms\Development Review Application.00C Rev. 4/05 `2005 West ree, Praf..!i ,l Services, mc. Preliminary Plans for Stonefield Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared for: Plowshares Developement, LLC. 1851 Lake Drive West Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Contact: Nathan Franzen Phone: 952-361-0832 Fax: 952-361-0833 Prepared by: W Westwood Professional Services, Inc. ]599 Ma9am Orire Eden Pair;., 55344 ebone: 993.9393 ]-5150 F..:952-937-5822 Project Number: 20051114.00 Contact: Curtis R. Neft, PE Vicinity Map (Not to Scale) CITY CF RECEIVED SSEN OCT 2 4 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT No. INDEX SHEET NO. DESCRIrITON 2 COVER EMSTING CONDITIONS 3 _ PRELIMINARY PLAT 4 PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 5 K9I PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 8 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN AND DETAILS 7 PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 8 PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION PLAN PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION INVENTORY PLAN 10 I PRELIMINARY STREET PROFILES 11 1 PRELIMINARY TYPICAL SECTION k DETAILS Vicinity Map (Not to Scale) CITY CF RECEIVED SSEN OCT 2 4 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT No. DAIS REVISION SHEEfB 1 10/20/05 RwAsed Per City Comments (CRN) 1, 3 h 4 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Preliminary Plans for SCANNED Stonefield Chanhassen, Minnesota Date: 10/14/05 Sheet 1 of 11 02005 Westwood Promehimd SerNcea I, Property Desa-ofan Mat haft of the No"hwesf Wa-fs o1 the Mem-hal WOM of $edam 2J. ThehMp 116 NwM, Rat, 23 MnC C County. YMerota Im9 Yestety of the IWown9 dha of Ione and its nMhaly and muMsfy extmtiM4 Canmehcn9 at Me $ouMewf cane of add NwMwesf Worts of the NMhwesf (,tarter, thence South 69 degeve DI mouth 49 aecmda Wbt 6mhg aaaumed obng Me Sof Me Of gn Npfh—t Quefs of Me NwM.es1 Quarter, o dufarw of MOW reef to Ma pont of b. nnn9 of the lira to be aovo e fhanca North I degee 57 mmutre 27 secsMs West. a dlafmoe of 46GW het Memo Nath 16 d reee 32 mnufg M seeand Eoat o diatmce of 3 W Feel Make North 52 do Tees W mnufee W emonde Met a dstmco of 6J657 that Mace them I degree 57 inutm 27 mmd Wvl a T'steoce of JW..59 tool to a point m me N,e, foe of mid NwMwsf Quarte of Me NaMaest Ouarte dDtmf 156.07 heel E=tWy Of Me Nome,b, cane of said N,f,Yest (Lata of Me NaMwf Wafls he meamved ym9 mfd NpM pa oN More f>mndih ANp Mat Pet of the Souawat oafs of Me Nomehh,t Quote of Section 23. TOMMY 116. Rahe 23, mov,bed of (dhows. tont Me MeM J7SW het I)ng Meet" of Me tdhwn9 OesaOeE Ino to-wil Bgnnn9 of a pant a the Nam IAe of said Saomeeef hath of NMheesf Whefe (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4) dtrfmf B49.JI ft "of of the NMheosf cane Mamf, Mmro S MwesfMy dMcfn9 64 d9ee s 42 mnuta 04 seconds from West to South ham mid NOM INS a dstanm of 16319 feet' Monro Southerly deflecfng to Me left Sc de,,. M mouth 37 secmdo a Omfmw of 125.62 Met, thmm Seoffi.feYy dMecto, to the rt 22 dh e W mouth W s da a A'atmce of M12J feet Mare Sculhely to the no-theaat cane of Me Emt 29075 Mf of the West 4642 feet of the Scum M9.7 feet of mon Sgtweef Water of Me Nobrwest Warts (SW 1/4 of NW f/4) oar meaartd doh Me West and £oaf lees of said Soumete aafle at Me Natheett Quarte (SW 1/4 of her 1/4). the— Scut p"If Wth Mt Wert fee of ea, s oMee,t WMe of the Notmehet Quah' to the South fne of mid Southwest Quote of Me NMheeof Dusts (SW 1/4 of NOW 1/4) and more t4lmea Mg, a Owing to the plot Mew, w Me W of recoil it the office of Me eaurty Remrde, Cases Comfy Ynnemfa AND Quttot A. Shmmdmh RAlp, accafdr9 to Me plat them/ m We af of raced a Me o fice of the Comfy Ren . C Comfy, Minnesota ebaM1act. MI, 1 LrCED —ror- WfR OlfIb1CA0 QY. 6V91/9M/B SIRfEIUIC Q I6fFWME 6W' CYYfEIAYIS l9E f. wyY o 1F30lNE YMIOL R06I //QAVfl01ID yve yi CIE1nW/$ lllfE p PoIIER PGE ® 1RAf7F LORM1 63! —.V— $ wrrY K IIMD IJ EIECIWC 6UF a I/ND NGL —m— StOOI YWW • shat/+tm rosr 3f'1 uLVIWC Yc1w mAWc wit —nen— mmrsc olgarAo v S4'T'-IR.1fF1C'NI1ER ® llLC1WC YAItlbE oV f xV4W —ue— RIEPIIGE LIQAY�IM sMh->RAEFIC/bIIRR ® n£nWc roam A MIARANI fat YAk BOX ® SAWTARY YAINdI: Ig IW lE1W �— fFN(F (ME f. NINGfMYD STALL ® Wwo CILAIMl7 (]xa Si(W BOX v.w.._ OEOIX s 1 LK Y fNW TETT ® BEFnK GRN oe. ® WATER eAhFW ayYRRG/5 IBFL NK e YpMTCWN:: MELL ® CA RN MSm Q MpL G/BB f GITTER ® CABIE ry BOx a ff,AED ET'O S MAh —em— C,EG[ ry pp op xs,9fnE Q rJ5 Yf IW ® srtne YANNGE —w¢- GA$ EIE ® g11NygIs y ACE � SuRiAM I fa'AKL S✓TAQ / y s�7rw- f1 ;s- nELjr YI �� -"ad I o Denotes Mm Moaumarf Set • DMateS Iron MMYTMf FWnd Oenofes Cast Iron Monument Pound Call 46 Hours belae digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin CITY Area 651-A54-0002 Mn. Tdl Free 1-600-252-1166 •M1i n! � WIfYYI la r a® k a. • �r -'t e t ,s 6 aJ t m/ ! C n. CHANHASSEN IWMA r� 00for --- /=� I I ( I � 916 118 C4 \ \ l ice----� 1 @y I I' . ✓ J/ 9ti 1�$ I 1 \$ 1 1 I I I,_us sq \ I I I 976 92- _,936 2-_ 936 \ 4F. M 9J \ // �/ /if'�•n L` / / 9 z 7 �..� _ J I Westwood W nH !/�14/!� Plowshares Development, LLC Rofessional Services, inc. .1—.11 4a C.% l.s 18A 1� diveWoo, Sulk 55DWoone. »-slse a.�ss2.n7.sm .. ma ft-LRe°"bffi-I Chsnhu aanpnalY SS3V V 1 / Stonefield 1-2 EW5111AE 01.0uE eta 10/14/05 SMlt 2 OF 11 ExMing Conditions 507°4YtOwE 1 44.10 R=330.00 IA-3e28'19e Chd. Brg'eN80e33'39"E I r I I Devebpment Data 45]4 If 3 / yJ6ef ---ting Zoning Aurof 4- 90 ft, (100 ft. on Prlwte Rd) % ,✓ /' arapased Land Use Low Density, Reedenfbl 15000 soft CrT'YOF IHANHASSEN I Rft-IfEIVED I OCT $ 4 2005 �I G"AWASSENIPUNNING I DEPT �/ (=r - Rear Yard Setback IF I A/ / / • \` J,�r\ \ b� 2 -'rife n✓a"iirivr'': -1 \ / \i n� ✓'^ \ Y7.128.f `SAS 60 /t. - Road Kidth 31 ft Bock -to -Bock \ 15123 sf \ p \ __ � — J 500°06'1400 150.$6 1�pi /// ,,pl�V • '• \ \\\� ' e6,'} IxisS ss' S 2 a \s se I> Iro1 �-7 St e\ / ... _ 0 g r_ -HAM ALE VnpnG 0vI 16,462 •i If ^. 17,219 IfbeAe\\. reEe 507°4YtOwE 1 44.10 R=330.00 IA-3e28'19e Chd. Brg'eN80e33'39"E I r I I Devebpment Data 45]4 If 3 I� jn a�cl j 2 25,931 sI ffi3� I I I 4 NI 3 cel I 81 23,568 If 11 1 23,995 If -i 1 Ell. Told Site Ares, 17.6di YC / yJ6ef ---ting Zoning Aurof - Lot Wath O Setback 90 ft, (100 ft. on Prlwte Rd) % ,✓ /' arapased Land Use Low Density, Reedenfbl 15000 soft ,reef Dedication 2.233 A. Jr \ 'otal Proposed Lots 30 - Fronf Yard Setback 30 R. I - Side Yard Setback � (=r - Rear Yard Setback IF \ S017e0-rWW 46000 - Wetland BUHer 165 N. err -'rife n✓a"iirivr'': 40 ft, tand utRify easemenf5 end/ be prondetl as requirM -ROW Waft, by the by the City. 60 /t. - Road Kidth 31 ft Bock -to -Bock I \ / \ 1192 =W 56.99 I> Iro1 �-7 C4 I -i 1 35876 If I� jn a�cl j 2 25,931 sI ffi3� I I I 4 NI 3 cel I 81 23,568 If 11 1 23,995 If -i 1 Ell. Told Site Ares, 17.6di YC Z-bv stalMWtls (p/hhxme) I I ---ting Zoning Aurof - Lot Wath O Setback 90 ft, (100 ft. on Prlwte Rd) �,W.kd Zoning RS - Lot Depth 125 ft, arapased Land Use Low Density, Reedenfbl \ I 15000 soft ,reef Dedication 2.233 A. Jr \ 'otal Proposed Lots 30 - Fronf Yard Setback 30 R. I - Side Yard Setback to ft. Street dimensions listed reference back of curt. - Rear Yard Setback 30 ft, \ S017e0-rWW 46000 - Wetland BUHer 165 N. - Structure Setback ham Bu//s 40 ft, tand utRify easemenf5 end/ be prondetl as requirM -ROW Waft, by the by the City. 60 /t. - Road Kidth 31 ft Bock -to -Bock \ / \ ozp `L6 I� jn a�cl j 2 25,931 sI ffi3� I I I 4 NI 3 cel I 81 23,568 If 11 1 23,995 If -i 1 Ell. Told Site Ares, 17.6di YC Z-bv stalMWtls (p/hhxme) I L ---ting Zoning Aurof - Lot Wath O Setback 90 ft, (100 ft. on Prlwte Rd) �,W.kd Zoning RS - Lot Depth 125 ft, arapased Land Use Low Density, Reedenfbl _ Lot Area 15000 soft ,reef Dedication 2.233 A. - Auvaage Lot Argo 21,7411 sq. N. 'otal Proposed Lots 30 - Fronf Yard Setback 30 R. OweB Sib DerWty (01Wv) 1.7D2 bb/oc - Side Yard Setback to ft. Street dimensions listed reference back of curt. - Rear Yard Setback 30 ft, All streets to haw curb and tter 9u az per City standards. - Wetland BUHer 165 N. - Structure Setback ham Bu//s 40 ft, tand utRify easemenf5 end/ be prondetl as requirM -ROW Waft, by the by the City. 60 /t. - Road Kidth 31 ft Bock -to -Bock I ay leeYMe.eAd Fewer' YiYM W Westwood Pr*ssioral $8MC85, Inc. +ewL.YY1�e..e�ruc I . r.r)�arer e,rW WTi sarnwe�.eelam >sg6 A+eaen o.•w =-use uw ssxa sett W. Ys erane'951-e1)S15a I -H).4)) -epi We 1If%�I� eeMeeW 2� Typical Lot (Varies) W. 816 ff-bat, _p nape R ty E.ent rock Lha r DeMaMnen', Dimension Numbs ,as. Lot Ares II it 5 NI I6 24,]59 sf 26,253 If ml I 25506 sf tA11 I l I L 16,450 sI -III J L app W =nom £ n).t] -err------'1 16,498 4f 11.245 If Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Mw 651-454-0002 Mn. Tail Free 1-800-252-1166 I 5562 4r r\ \ �mx�Rrojwro 9 `'i9, Asa IfM�\- %10 K1lO// SUaTt' SEWM (m) J5,665 If Ia I _ :%\ I SOOe07'32"W 1251.67 sW caf x00 i I/e 6 TIE e. 1/ SEC 23 Property DeecMtion Mat pM of the No forest Quarter of the Nmlhwl aa,te of Sear 24 )oenshq 116 North, Range 23 West. Carom County. MMnesota. Ifing westerly of Me rok."'g desmDed IMe and its northerly and southerly a tnsiorg CcmmenMp at Me Seuth-1 c of said Northwest Q o,tr of Me N-th-1 W>fw: tierce South 89 dfgrees 04 mnutes 49 sebarnde Wast. bearing os.umed dorrg the South /Fe of raid NuMmsl Warier of Me Northwest Cuarta, a dietmce of X, 0 art to Me pahl of begnnag of Me I.M to be deab beet thence No -M 1 dqp 57 -Zes 27 exmW Mast, o defance of 46000 feet: thence Na-Ih 18 = 32 hate 33, ssmds East. a Oiftmce of SN100 feet: fhenro North 51 agars (b Fusee 00 seconds West.a M}farce of 63657 feet: tele. Nath 1 agar 57 iwfes 27 sttvreI nest, o bestarce of 15059 feet to a poerf m Me Nath Nro of -kF No'Mmst Wats or the NaMwbt Water diettnt 156.07 Net EastMy of Me No-theat caner of mek Northeast Wate- of Me Nerfheert Wats as measured dm9 said NSM liar and Mee tamerefhg AND Met psf of Me Southwest Warta of Me NrMeset Warta of Section 21 Mmshp II6, Rmge 23. descrbod as fdfoe4 fo-wH. the norM 37500 Mt tfeg M oMe, of Me IWeehg CesaAea lire. to -wit 8egkmig at a pont e, Me Mo M Feb. or soil Southeast Water of Nathwl Water (SW 1/e of NW 1/4) datmt 84931 Mt Wast of the Northeast comer Merest thence SouM.'arty deffecfng 64 degrees 42 ohnutes 04 secmM More Meet to South than mH NpM In; a d Z.: of 163nSo 19 feet thece ufhedy b6ectirp to Me left J2 de35grees notes J] Accords a dtatence of 12562 feet thence SoufhwesMny de6ecfng to Data) Me d hl 22 degree W mhutea 52 eecmds o IXsfance of 30223 Met, fh-- SauNe'ly to the natheest caner of the East 29025 Net of the Met 48e.2 feet I Me South 5397 feet of seek SmMresf WwM of Me Northwest Quarts (5W 1/4 of NW 1/4) as meoared olong the Mest and East /het of seed Seuthwsf Water of the No -them Warier (SW 1/4 of NW 1/4): Mese south berate with the West the of said Southeast Wat, of Met Northwest Water M the South Ime at saek 5outheest Warta, err the Narth—t Quarter (SW 114 of Nw 1/4) and there trmfnetlna «ceding m Me Plat thereof err We or or record n the of6ce or the Caunfy Rasads, C. Count, W,,ssofo ANO WNof A, 9rmmdoa5 MJVg em-dh9 is Me blas thaw/ m Ne a or re , . Me oboe or Me County Recorder, Cswr Cant,, AMebemte Abstract � — I p)epered for. Plowshares Development, LLC. s� tan airs weer, soma ss6 ('1..b.,h ..r. L4i)eesda 55312 I _J I L _W LW (f )xE \_ SW I/4 lY iNE IEMpLxAHr x00. r/4 gc n p6y -SAC Mat filoaAIERF DEMELMN JeMexMIse, M,haloposel. GLC. N.M. Franzen 1851 take d%ee West Saxe 5w (NaIlll., W. 55311 Phare (952) 361-0&31 far. (952) J61-OR13 Cantactea Nn Man Feta Westwood Pro/ sural Se b,., Inc. 7599 Ano,,ram Orire Eden Prairie, MN. 55344 Phone: (952) 9J7-5150 Por (952) 9J7-5622 Contact, CLrtis NeN Stonefield Me 11 Meout dbneasims and de as be this also e approstmote. Refer to the Final Plat bra sapportm, data for esa<t lot dimensions enc areas 0' 60' 120' 180' = 2 2CO5114PPiDI.OME Os<e 10/14/05 shoe 3 a n Preliminary Plat x2005 Westwood ProfesalOnol SerNaea, Ina CITY OF CHANHASSEN _ RECEIVED OCT 2 4 2005 I ] CHANHASSEN PLtti .I T — — — — II I -� ! I // IWn<.. •3Aa my) ! PHOPOMD 10' M .. BOfTER Y1BAIX \ (11V r[nAlo \ \ \mar \ / lil I 4 I 5 II 31 it �aa` li iY li li t � II � Call 45 Haare before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twln My Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-600-252-1166 I/ wN .--rem// � a �.1,.�.. "_ '� �— -YI' –� V' L fie . d Y Sri "+ E•' / y •:�\ �� I M`f� ti.: .» �ovZr►c . �; ,, Z I Mill ME% '` •;�� NOW i+�. _ i_� AV""'Mp —� �/��1�� ,, a•n.�'��, �� ✓1.�. p<�a '(��'�\.�A.� J a►I��E'6`'�fiq JIB f�`��G a�•�m, .<� C. �!\T;�� . r� .� �1 0T MOT at'. t4",�..`•C'+ � F"-'4 NOI�for it `�`,�r/'�I� �� '1!��NQig,;�t!yil„�s��„�s`A��Ij°�6 171, 10 ♦♦,i��i� ` —' ��ie .mss.. .��ny,•/�� ...: i A��\ ,,C.\� �i��y�.r►�� M��F�;.Y' r%<►�=:sA:,trf ../'. _= �.._. _----- \!� ,..e� IN =1 W-2 li 1 i rP . .a•r .a . •a ar �a a a • • • • • • / IIa1..YAaOm I / be r�� ' j I 1. IWn<.. •3Aa my) ! PHOPOMD 10' M .. BOfTER Y1BAIX \ (11V r[nAlo \ \ \mar \ / lil I 4 I 5 II 31 it �aa` li iY li li t � II � Call 45 Haare before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twln My Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-600-252-1166 I/ wN .--rem// � a �.1,.�.. "_ '� �— -YI' –� V' L fie . d Y Sri "+ E•' / y •:�\ �� I M`f� ti.: .» �ovZr►c . �; ,, Z I Mill ME% '` •;�� NOW i+�. _ i_� AV""'Mp —� �/��1�� ,, a•n.�'��, �� ✓1.�. p<�a '(��'�\.�A.� J a►I��E'6`'�fiq JIB f�`��G a�•�m, .<� C. �!\T;�� . r� .� �1 0T MOT at'. t4",�..`•C'+ � F"-'4 NOI�for it `�`,�r/'�I� �� '1!��NQig,;�t!yil„�s��„�s`A��Ij°�6 171, 10 ♦♦,i��i� ` —' ��ie .mss.. .��ny,•/�� ...: i A��\ ,,C.\� �i��y�.r►�� M��F�;.Y' r%<►�=:sA:,trf ../'. _= �.._. _----- \!� ,..e� IN =1 W-2 li 1 i rP . .a•r .a . •a ar �a a a • • • • • • SVA. hm Ir\,H I I X004 I I j II II —L—_1 (wmLc'U�IMc 2 sN'HAij I ALY..WII ----- \2\\\\ I 3 1 I , �tT. -- � FMN I i I I i I I I I I j I S I I J 1 I hl I �I H a MTFR / wARNNG / Nu,-vaE55u PIPDIYE(5) / LTOGYATpN ANaM awsRucnoN PRCIA41m / / W1NOIfT NYWHIAM2 wIH suTE wE-cM1 AVD / M11NUT MbTTFN PFIM590X / YACDIAM PPpK CpIPINIT. _ / ERND (TW) / AIwiR (TTP) I � / PROFUSED b (TV) •ER \ / dFFER SEIBAIX I I /I I 1 0 \ \ \ 2 I1 11 1� 11 II 5 It I i 3 ii 4 ii ;1 !! ! it it II II li II Rr-yN II II II Nim 1 1 1 11 11 I I .tOJ t---__„ A•1-tl.,ao I i RWp.T2,1p_W IL------' L-- ----J LM'•0W1a__�-NItP• Ca 48 Haaro fiefs• eiggmg: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TV. Cit, Aro. 651-454-0002 W. T. Free 1-800-252-1166 vrv-1137.10 DUSTING SANITARY SEWER — d PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER —a— WATER WATER —I— HYD. W/VALVE I l r-----7 STORM SEWER r__---"1 r----- i I 1 I 1 1 II I I t 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 11 rl-os I AWHMW00 1 1 f 11 it J LJ I•L \I xn04 / \ X W •- -------- L--B--_J L__ Ir\,H I I X004 I I j II II —L—_1 (wmLc'U�IMc 2 sN'HAij I ALY..WII ----- \2\\\\ I 3 1 I , �tT. -- � FMN I i I I i I I I I I j I S I I J 1 I hl I �I H a MTFR / wARNNG / Nu,-vaE55u PIPDIYE(5) / LTOGYATpN ANaM awsRucnoN PRCIA41m / / W1NOIfT NYWHIAM2 wIH suTE wE-cM1 AVD / M11NUT MbTTFN PFIM590X / YACDIAM PPpK CpIPINIT. _ / ERND (TW) / AIwiR (TTP) I � / PROFUSED b (TV) •ER \ / dFFER SEIBAIX I I /I I 1 0 \ \ \ 2 I1 11 1� 11 II 5 It I i 3 ii 4 ii ;1 !! ! it it II II li II Rr-yN II II II Nim 1 1 1 11 11 I I .tOJ t---__„ A•1-tl.,ao I i RWp.T2,1p_W IL------' L-- ----J LM'•0W1a__�-NItP• Ca 48 Haaro fiefs• eiggmg: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TV. Cit, Aro. 651-454-0002 W. T. Free 1-800-252-1166 vrv-1137.10 pRN1AlE MO . / EA%MN1 (TVP) J General Utility Notes • THE CONTRACTOR SHAH VERAI' ALL EXISTING CONOInONS PRION TO CWSTRUCTON AND NOTIFY THE OWER OF ANY DIFFERENCES. • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE THE NECESSARY PERMITS FOR ALL WORK WTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY UNITS, • SEE ARCH, PLAN FOR EXACT BLDG. LOCATION. SEE SITE PLAN FON LAYWT DIMENSIONS MANCE ENTRY LOCATIONS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE ARCNTECT. • VERIFY EXISTING NVERT LOC k ELEV. PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. • THE MATER SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MIN. OF 8.0 FT. OF COVER THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE OTY AS-BLALT CONSIRUCTON PIANS TO CHEM LOCATION AND MATERIAL TME. • AL_ STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE -A4 J UN OTHERWISE NOTED. • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' FOR FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO UTILITY INSTALLATION. • UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS. CONST TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE 1999 ED. M TIE *STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIOCATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND $(VICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION BY THE CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF WNN.' AND TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION' MINN. DEPT OF TRANS, SEPTEMBER 5, 2000 INCLUDING THE CURRENT ADDENDUM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REWIRED TO FOLLOW ALL PROCEDURES AS OUTLINED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY. T•NGEM DUSTING SANITARY SEWER — d PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER —a— WATER WATER —I— HYD. W/VALVE I l r-----7 STORM SEWER r__---"1 r----- i I 1 / 1 1 II L t 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 11 rl-os I AWHMW00 1 1 f 11 it J LJ I•L \I 6 I I 11 •- -------- L--B--_J L__ I I I I • J__ 'r _J L L -------- pRN1AlE MO . / EA%MN1 (TVP) J General Utility Notes • THE CONTRACTOR SHAH VERAI' ALL EXISTING CONOInONS PRION TO CWSTRUCTON AND NOTIFY THE OWER OF ANY DIFFERENCES. • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE THE NECESSARY PERMITS FOR ALL WORK WTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY UNITS, • SEE ARCH, PLAN FOR EXACT BLDG. LOCATION. SEE SITE PLAN FON LAYWT DIMENSIONS MANCE ENTRY LOCATIONS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE ARCNTECT. • VERIFY EXISTING NVERT LOC k ELEV. PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. • THE MATER SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MIN. OF 8.0 FT. OF COVER THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE OTY AS-BLALT CONSIRUCTON PIANS TO CHEM LOCATION AND MATERIAL TME. • AL_ STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE -A4 J UN OTHERWISE NOTED. • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' FOR FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO UTILITY INSTALLATION. • UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS. CONST TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE 1999 ED. M TIE *STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIOCATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND $(VICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION BY THE CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF WNN.' AND TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION' MINN. DEPT OF TRANS, SEPTEMBER 5, 2000 INCLUDING THE CURRENT ADDENDUM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REWIRED TO FOLLOW ALL PROCEDURES AS OUTLINED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY. T•NGEM DUSTING SANITARY SEWER — d PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER —a— WATER WATER —I— HYD. W/VALVE HYD. W/VALVE --`f STORY SEWER Oa STORM SEWER NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0' 60' 120' TBE i -z zaosntwmm oWa pws 1 0/I4,f 05 sr•c 5 w b "=" r"- ft&m wy I "'""" Stonefield I I ". wescwooa R �ezva B� sLYv c s Inc. r. � t� Plowshares Development, LLC. uull M,,, Fdvi Ri1"•""�"' 4YIM E m^ ra -YL 115E Law Od" wee, SdR 590 tXtM�Ns.WTTats re Wn-n>am .,� 1W1U05 NIfB Nr rrrrr 0..b. Hm.s.la 558T/ n..•u.��. ...•Y... c 02005 WeMb PFOTaseional Servl a Ma 1 _ I I � I I / / / 1 / � J .-T-- I— I I I I /r� / M M, z". VVeft ,vod ftft, iaQl Sffwesr hG rre_rrrrrrr E9 M OTe E��...5�1.. 2. 90 li II l 22 V ff I —942� oY. _ I �-- Plowshares Development, LLC —� 1651 Lie W" wet, S 4* W Stonefield W1 48 Nava Wf" Eg*q GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TT jn OIty Mea 651-454-0002 IN. TW F. 1-600-252-1166 KI 120 - _ -51..41 .OF 10/14/05 s.c 7 w n Tree Preservation Plan 02005 Wetsood Professional SadCes Inc. Tree Preservation Data . Lase Deasa7 RoWeotial Goss Site Meo 1763 4/ -Ac Net Site Area 1760 M Wetlands .03 $coop Mopes egg Ac Cross Canopy coley �T Aq Net Canopy 4,69 A. Wetlands ,02 M. Steep elapse .00 Aa. Baseline Canopy Cows (4"69 Ac / 1760 Ac - 27%) 271 Total Required Canopy (301) (17.]5 X .30 - 5.28 Ac.) 5.28 Ac Canopy Needed (528 Ac - 4.69 Ac - .59 Aa) .W Ail, Canopy Ranoved (344 Ac to Welding limit tine) 744 Ac Replace hent Required 1) ("59 Ac X 1.0 Ac = .59 Ac Canopy refuted oboes eating) .59 Ac (3 H Ac X 1.2 Ac 4.13 Ac Canopy Re nosed) 4.13 M. Total Replacement Requi ed (4.13 M. 4 .59 Aft. = 4.72 Ac) 4,72 Ac Requires Tr. (4.72 Ae. v +,560 W = 205,605 W / 1089) 189 Tres Landscape Trees PraNded 189 Trow Tree Protection Detail Mow dean, YM Cw:awctian �s:[a Lccallm m seam pm - 5<d1e eery IS ma.knum. pmt p Ya T' Pwl a FpM 9• cmewnal Fmm Staked E,sy 6' t. Pruning NI Ee ams p prareavmae wm9 gyroar{vte WnN9 eeoun. z No at r,,e of m ns an cgratim of moa:nwy, or m.aopmert of mY . es eM1n me knw-IFe , spar. n n eMp horn tM 3.91e 7-9 to se pane WY after g Isthe mme:na M,e bee, ta:ssa sly M1� opposed d as 404 ore hate bem brieled on bM eessnwlKn teNnialp. ID»see... _SeyeslRemawd hG fti leall�" �]031 Mak Willov, Rttnaze : ] I i - _ - _. -- --'T-1 xis 7148 s e iSw90MBwM0 Ba ENr i ft OLh M 10 ]072' 84th VAliwv 7=1 MrAVmds` _ 7031 M6Y. VWax _ _ 0436 Birk lMa'yM nodi Bbpt y6apA - 70A &edc N�Nw�' _ _ - MM1 BIrA MAux - MA: BaaNY'laOs _ _7001 Mak 1paTe 7011 - Bbpt Nrbl 0412: 91st 6tlaly x03; Mak kvaoW 7011) Merd, MissPswd_ 7018' Back yAbe R Remo,ea 8_ :: Remo,ai _.__7 '!7151 R,- o ao 6 Ren o 18 if -Karo R� _- 5 -_.. - .. Remo.el 12 x Re11pM "RmnW - -. Mmes -,...7_ ..71W RessW - 10 _- Rented - B _ ^J I "1 R'sini 7 Su rM Y )Ise I ft ]152 Saw M-pl, Mnord )100 SI¢Myb MwYYB 71M SI�Y b Released TIM 11,0101e as- 7158 Salle, Seem :71A1 Seed _ ! 7100 Bal 1 Rssessm S rel a Seo 19077 Esbm Ria Cebr MrasW los usereal laa 1 Rst Bose Mrosk MI09d 9004- BUOY ass ] 7 ] 7 a a a 0 0 10 d e is ! tuee! Bacs"isce' nmted 6 Wt aMOsk Rwnwed 7 Calbroo8 7047. Mack yA6OW ]010 Mrk YAtwv� Re`NNad Rcmo-cd 7 6 90721 BYOsk � Releases It Nw 8015 Su�MI�Menw90 1) X .70111 BaaN NANvx�_Rsrloued 7180 Bat val Rernn.M - -6 - 1 side 3uo ma b 9ellaed 7 D s 19071' Mage Mdsaed e Released 7061 Back 9AOwi _.Rersscl ]_-1_91ak kWlow 7053 BIsk MMael Rerro'.M RrasE 9 - a 1 x one 190)9. 9000 SIwMMapee RRenaW Spyill" �_MseO a Mope � 7 8 9 Imus BaYrM M." 700 Breck W8lprt Mash ]I :IMI Rinsed a 71165 1 sack uWawe Rmwted it ! 9p0TRentww 9171. e set 12 '04537 MM ylaar Mesita a W 1 Bow awemill Masa a AmrotEa 7057 Betlt YYabi Released 9 9011- R e 91731 1x181. Blak lleapeI Need - D X 119asm lossBakelM III AssWees Ea RYIrlaled 10 1 1 �� meet sees _ ! 35 1 i 1 - meow: s : Io R.laea a ._ Restated10 '.70741 ads Seo is 1 BOA Sullwifiellies, : ROve4 ] twist .IAnseka17A5TF•e SMO 12I sew Ser Mepe 1 RensaeE a x ]0a MrIcs16nI awed 5 1 i ems, s erM a Raraea� 7 1 RreaW it ]071 Maras6n Shed 7 Mi SugeriMple 1 Rlasw6a 7 (ieeN6Vl0e Asn Mie Alrseba fpm SMO 10 . poll 1 S ells le 1 8 en. 9107' ' 7A9 AmdkknEa seema Ml S 59 rtA* Ress, Meple�Rirr 7 0 Is e ]000 Anssun Ell t0 I it9��007_��S��er 1. ]OB1 Mabe Ea $9sA a - 905 Mope - Rensea Seer Msk Remo ] 8 70821 8v EMs, Seo a ea[Mde Sao 7 9098 eon se Oak RrsW as Oak _ Renvea 0 a -' p ]OB4 A1tlelkM Ea SBsd 7 7085 Mabel Ea. 7 MomsElm sand Swed 6 W ICM- : 1180951 _ M1Yera1 Elm -Renewed GaeuuNele Ash' Ranges a 7 a MMi6iiwmkm 5807 10 1NgIBeIENc RmIoW 8 SeW I Aleedral Ea Swed 4 NN Baa Elle RurwO 12 t0at e e EM" ]OW AfeeconEa - - Seed 1 TBio Ntl 6 Maple Ranased 9 7907 amm= sMe I a 9107 Asrexal Ea RenoW n 9107 Mlle FitenMCeOer', RerlveE- Ii 001 Moue Ea _MsoW B 705: Amain Eta Sao o z NW Save Mega 1 Pmvea a 10 7aBe MsaiunEa : SMa,_ s 006 Mle®lEa , PennW It Sesed 7091 Bat Etle seed tl 9107 Msb Painsa 0 loll MOek )098' Mtevl Elm -- seW - 0 9108 Amairas Fkn 'RaeOW 0 nose Bf/O1a ^row1 10 mm Fee gM ReasW , 14 Reerlelea 7 ]107 Maeas Ea SasE "' B 91» segermps Masa : a YepY '7191 Maury Elm ittMaran Elm PermW Rm1o1M ] 1 -- a Nit Reticles R 13 Neal M12 Moak ibnO'ed t Mood 6 ]107 MaerasEat_Releloeed__ .]101 BetE dot 1 Rrtaea _-_. '7107' 9 a - M13 St¢YMIs RYOetl 7 Door- Sin" MauReleaReleasednm Rn0 IereOsd 6 Bepeoo0 RenrouN 7itl0. MteicenE saes - 7160--B -xx Sa-_--- >110 Basswood sssa- 8 - a a it 9116 Styr RelIO1ea 91» Stena EttlI Remo a 8 91ti sip MI Re1asW 0 SprM s 91181 Su rMeps Renlotea 6 7111_ 8msnood Remo I---. 17 X N» Ieleaea 7 Pleased a 71121 fief Elora 1113 �- Box ElderRemov 7114 BMann Rickoa Saved N - Remote 9 -_ 8 13 B1aSys 021 Na' Mepb Rrswed Be OBk 1 Masted Reeaad MahasEa Reraed 10 e 12 It X 7115 0aeev.00d Ren N ---- ] -BmseoW lite 7117 Bees. Rena a,1 RemowJ "� ----7--ON,MsekalEa ',10 7 Rredtea a Alleeal Elle 9125 91a 3 elM' Y assesses stpr IfispleIY1nOted 1 7 8 aenmed 7114 BesesaoE ..--Reno eE : 8 T1t9 Su rMape Masa 0 919 sees, MI taint Bat EMs, X 171a Bea EMB Rnaed 1 17 91a BSleel, ft 10 1Ww Super Mope__ ?IV Sucel AenlO:ea a 91a Ba, Duk I Rntot•d 9 719 s Maps Relrwa a 090' Rnataa 10 Meed 8 Tia Su "Maple Rerased 6 NN I sevessiholeRamal 0 ESWaasp Cade 1174 Su rM a RYNaW 7 "a Ser Yeple Rareed 10 9211 AmerasEa ReraW a lea. Ser sees, Bela Ss�Yepe RwNW 7 Wei 053 Mnbaea a _tonsGaeMNMe MM1 71a ft s 091 SPMMIa RentwlM 7 719 Anseimt Elle Med 1 e 035 Bot ms, Mood ] RwnW 0 3 :71amaw RaetN a x Na Box Eller MOW ] eau Y N 71ia. Red 13,& Reassed 12 91A sow Elle RsinW 7 0721: Tia: star Myna Resasa • On quilivessesKowa a I 7131 MaunEa Moat 19 ON sagirmaseRarOW a 7 7 a 7132 Masseuses, Rraed T 040 Msl,Wi a Rows -0-0-0 71M Retroed 12 x MI Sul1Wbl Renp'ea I a Sups WOe 7191 xBM Rwtsed Rwloed 9 92a; )tor S rM • 7135 RwOa1 Nnwa 12 x a 910 19srYVMIe MM1 Mand M" Stpriial- Mowed 11 8 a 7137 $IBI" seemed a 9145 SuBYMaple__ l" Renwd 8 Released 7199 Rarased 0 9148 _ Sig. Mapa--t Maga a too Red k TIM Maga I 6 9147 Ser Mage Rel. 7 7+40 Bat EMs, Rano 11 91uMage Mmes 8 RensW 8 7141 Bat Etle Pernod a 9100 &WMWM Masa ) e s ea Ea 7042 eewraod Mreaed 7 1 9160 sumuipie sensed 7 We 7143 Mss Mesa 7 05, esessisisseResraW ] 1104 Beaoed MOW a Mo RrO'ed ) 9 7146 BIMed Rxnwad 8 i 9153 BONEM Rarasad 10 RelaaseE )140 Bas EIOe Resold ! 6 111501 Wow leek 1Matl N loll Ba EMs, 711) eseWaO Rowed i 6 053 MWIEea I PasaW U 7144 ass. PesgW » 9153 CmlaeseOO Ramal 16 s Released 32 Da S+ued4lliI n , 00.h NBM Wa SeleMeaw6d OLh NOM NA As,s,aeaE" Renaed It 1Wtl Supt Mope Seo i 9100" Calbroo8 ReraW a tONt Box Etl" Swell 8 Nw AsratasEa Reseed N x .foxy eMae ffctwy luseae0 i NB{ Asrabet Ea Released 8 10241 eimal li4clNW Released i 91651 AprhltEa RldYA 1 12 Imus BaYrM M." Rented 7 I Mo MlerbrsEa list Asp 9 1102M GseaNNab AM Resssa it 9171. sae sen E,e set 12 too] Sege Mel RessW 15 ' x 9172' AmrotEa Mmood 1 10218- Steer Maya RensW 6 91731 Msr"v1Ea Rases 12 lossBakelM III S wed 8 074. AsrrtesEa ft i 10250' Sear Msb Restated10 W75 MW Reeved • twist P<vaed I 8 9104. Sege Yeple Reeasd a x l0 Seer keeps Reassess 7 9119 gat -duxes Aa 1 RreaW it loss MOY Restaffed � 9 9100' (ieeN6Vl0e Asn FiWeNed » 1051 sM1r Released a en. 9107' sups, Mepa su rMmb Meed a ReaW 7 lobs BmN Edo 1@59 StprMepb Rented RasaW Is e 9107 Su rasps Reread 7 stoA summa Mope Seed 084 la Released 6la 6 lona Bait Eder is sE -' p 053 s raspy Meed 7 tow Sups Maps east a 1 9100 S Pesio'ed B 10iw supe Msle SeW 0 91A Mrksl Ea MlOted 0 t0at e e EM" Sesed ) Ntl Seer Yepe RwaW 10 10282 Supe Maple 1L- No. Elder 1102= Sugar Mage ter super Mase -` - Swed Seed $led seed 0 a 0 a Nw atpe YeOY Rnmrd 7 Nw. SPYepY Relrssed ] n91 Sesryyls Mold 7 9107 Yepe : ReIOW ] 1o2w EMs, Seo 11 9107 S Ye01e MOW 1 _Bo. 1027 BaeEMs, sexed 10 'NMI a rMepY Released 6 10298: S1prM b Sesed 7 0. lR19Y Fw 6 loll MOek SM 1s Neal Seer YepY ft 6 ,0704- s.pr Us* Sesd 6 I NAI stprYepY Reerlelea 7 1091! Sugar Maps seed Nw YepY Renlosed T _10772! Bast Els, Sesed » Neal MNde Mood 6 IM" Seer Maple MOed 6 Door- S b IereOsd 6 109{ Seer MapM Released f0 9291' SprM s RYSW 6 1095 Sees, Al MOW 7 ell@ s era b Pleased a tor0 seer Maps Fill i 1 9207 Estem MCW. ads 7 1027 SW"MI )WOW 7 Wo1 Alleeal Elle Rested • 1098 suerMeple aenmed 7 Wo Assw1-ieEw MaW f0 taint Bat EMs, Russell 9 920 11111atlaan Etel Aellwd a 1Ww Super Mope__ ResaW 8 Vai, Red OAt Meed T 1020 twwoad Rensosp 11 WOe Msesim []m Meed 8 10a2 Maple RansaeW d 9212 ESWaasp Cade Renata 0 x lQiM Stew Mepk� lose Mage tonsSeer Mepe 1 •t02w Seer Mage Renwea R. Rraea Reared 7 -..- ] _- 1 ]8 1 S 9211 AmerasEa ReraW a W51 MMM Meed 8 Bela Ss�Yepe RwNW 7 Wei Rennsed 0 _tonsGaeMNMe MM1 Ranged M Wta tet SMope ft. 6 lots sawMepb �'__Rensad a W» RwnW 0 s IOT91 seple - -Rased 1 6 990, eau Y N RennrO 0 1011,21 easier MMM-Ratiaswa 7 0721: Rated a 1101131 Super WSY 1 Reload 7 92a- S raspy Released a I»2Nj Suer Mole 1 1o95 Syler Maple 10200 $ter Wee Rased Renaleal- 7 7 a 92a: auger Yeple Reaped 7 094- Yee Released 6 093 Spy Yyle MOW 7 1029n� E Idea Styr Yapla --Ren Rmved- -: » 41 0 was Seger Mope Rreatl A 8 929 Sups WOe Reseed 6 'low Stye Wpb I Rwtsed ' a D 92a; SsrYepa Pensgwd 8 10500 Bs EMs, I Resealed a 92201 Maple Raldsd 6 low eat EMs, Released - 11 - 9'aD Sspr Msb Massed 8 too Red k assessed a X �9A11 Gse9WlRe Mn assessed 13 Tam- Anabws E9n MOW 9 I Wo; Gsx NNnse MM1 RensW 8 :10504 MOek assOW 0 WaAmsi Wst�Amalos e s ea Ea sW Reer11 Raawed 12 D 115M AmeMws Ea 1too Ametka Ea Real RedsO _ n 6 We GtwdylBe Aeh Moe! 9 10904 Amelben EaKrises 66 sa6. Spy MCOb Released 6 10508 Amabr Ea ResssO 9 9237' sager Mee Rel a tWlg--Bae"EM., RelaaseE 1 a Wa Steel MepY Minted a loll Ba EMs, ft 91 x sell suer Mede Ranased 7 tW12 AmrotEa Relssd Y2M 1 Yepe s Released 32 S tots Amerce Ea Rrtatl 16 901 Styr Mope RssW 7 1014 ArswasEa Rsroed 7 ae1mW a 10715: Aqaba Ea ._.Rasoes n 92As Stpr mom ft 7 tot8 Mwias Ea - Retgsed a 9b4 asset L Is Relrmrd 7 1Wt7 Box EMs, Released 11 We Raved 9 1018 Artakas Ea ""e-RenxW MSW 8 :1W1a! s tE10e Mewed T 110919 Amelae Ea 0 1 71 eeewoba Mewed 10 1 lailiwi Bev Eder Released 1/ total MllselRl04 Mswed 0 1 103 1, Cs-dWMY Resssed 10 10219 Ser Yeple Reload a I 1079 MlatatEa Recessed 7 10TH seer RnOsed a -1025 Mann Ea Released 6 10721 amt edr RrsaW » 1021 sox EMs, Released 6 1079 RasvW 7 IQ= Bs EMs, Ranaled a 107231 Sertlab Meed 8 11Wa Bm EMs, R 7 IMVI Styr Mae Released a 1039 Box EMs, Rerlased 7 it Resided B 1Wa Gssss Aa ikes a 1096! Resatl 6 -✓Mae Aa Ressnsd 10 1079 Skase Maple Reaseed -6 ertM'Mla Asn Rased 11 tea Mees Renwstl B mencr Elm �I:V:2Gs, Renata 1{ 102a s r e e Rased 8 wMY AM RareW ) IM30 S U-0. Maws 8 ea» Ammo Ea Rasta 0 1031: BIR all Seed 7 1WM' AmmralEa Resnsd 0 .102-''0; Pnal-Bn Wtna'W 1) x 10735 Gsee�vlNMb Asn 1114 Reneed 12 IW33; psreMatF3n MsoNed ] - 11-AmaaesEa Rr1sW tt 10734 107 , BS Bdr Amw"as16n ResaW 13 SweC -- • '10731 Rmalcen Ea 1 "-103]6 c:eeMYlebefA- MOsed Released 1t 1036: AmeblEel Sand t ! .10339 Sitessel Rwrsed 11 1079! AnselkelEa beW 7 :10310- eaerospi Related 7 102a' Oa EMs, Swed 11 .1W41�GsesNNM11 AYs IYensed 11 107%, SsPr�6Ne Reeassed ) ,1oQ MeselFatEa Mosel tt D Notes: X = Split Tree D - Diseoeed/DanageC Tree S = Specirnm Tree Cdl + Have bs/w d ggb4 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Tab City Moo a51-151-0002 W. TM Free 1-800-252-1166 L -z 7[LLSmeroP.11. [ w. 10/14/05 Mee 9 GF u �� "`- �- - "` Stansfield Tree Preservation I I W weSt,Hona «des LeS'i I �" `'" -: Clesish- Plowshares Development LLC Invents Pmt essiseld 1:s, I I / Inventory fee. arei,ie Nalsew aTwaa 4 Ftah 1851 [ )hive West, Suitt 550 nwanmmt-s15o r.e ennTae2x o.r 10/IVW _as. se am aNdAme.rree Chanhassen, Minneel SMV I Gwtluwm. MinstooM DATT 6Z 6V 915 W DA} SbMCOf. L.P. E V = 931.)9 LP. STA = 6+91.13 PA STA = 6+65 PN ElEV - 925.00 A0. 15.38 K = 21.45 W1 48 Hmm baWe dggMg: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twh CITY A m 651-454-0002 Wn Tdl Fra 1-800-252-1166 IS+W t6+W m+W 11+00 12+W 13+W Westwood RdessionalServices, hc �• �"'� r••.•1••�'� ]593 Muyan DrM EEm Rtir4. MN 553Y �� L N k rj Maw: XI�X]�)1X Rt Xid))-y)] tee 10/1V88 ]yw 4N1 14+W Itt�+)rr,W�w..)tr�wre Y�Ya ". 7+00 18+W 19+W 20+W 21+W 22+00 23+00 24+W STREET A NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION L_] ]COSI.D1Po3 D.G 50' 1W' 150' 0/14/05 m..c 10 of11 Pxep"E� Plowshares Development, LLC. ifl5t t.4. Ui Wet' Suite 5% Stonefield Profile rsp=t V SW.M iY Qunluret. Mlvuu]ta 55312 Clrm. uvhMlwmt4 I is NRNfA f ATON 99 LOT NUYBOt >- PRANAOE ARROW 919.0 MW pIQRO FIEVAT ON TOFINISHFR 10 FRONT CARACE SLAB EliVA1NN. AT N OF PFD LO 916.0 (W APNRJORE ) AND HAY BALM FaS LROLPD EIEVAIIDI Ai PFM Qi 1N�r BART RDOR ) ) E ATNN rc FRONT CURAGE 5 F ATON 5 L T A - WNRar NOTE TE lJ IMMATS TNAT TE GARAOE MAN R -RY 1 'DCN OIi 0.7 FEET KELP/ iK WOOD >i -SDE WNMVT THE (2) 4NPGAT6 THAT 1HE GARAQ 6 AN ADDITIONAL 2 9.00N5 OR 14 FEET BELOW TE FNtST FLOOR FI£VAnON IYRCAL LOT MA& 1111TH Ill : .1 E .._ HEIGHT.� STANM eAWITH EACH SIDE. r_r • p A , - \/ / \� yiTAIL WITH QMM� I NOM. A MINNUM HEIGHT OF I.V AND CONTAIN MAXIMUM SIDE SLO� OF +. 1. TO AN ARIEA THAT WILL NOT CON�TE %DIUENT TyF-V&UND CAN K I NRNfA f ATON 99 LOT NUYBOt ( PRANAOE ARROW 919.0 MW pIQRO FIEVAT ON TOFINISHFR 10 FRONT CARACE SLAB EliVA1NN. AT N OF PFD LO 916.0 (W APNRJORE ) 9210 FaS LROLPD EIEVAIIDI Ai PFM Qi 1N�r BART RDOR ) ) E ATNN rc FRONT CURAGE 5 F ATON W Westwood Prdessiord Services, Inc. ]59JA 9/^Or'ne fCm hall MI SS3N NassnanaTss ra sssanaaa Taw_ � 41 �.� rRle�RN RseY a Ti1D PA D+. Err 4M 0.5' DEEONORR 6 iLOW ON SREET TYPICAL LOCAL STRM SEC'PION ', 1& BACK TO BACK) REFER TO PLAN SHEET FOR DIMENSIONS 5: EXACT SIDEWALK LOCATION SEE PLAN VIEW FOR DIMENSIONS R 30' NO C 115' D A¢ E UTNTY 1A.5' EASflIDRT eou"'ARD ��— 201'OPE O O o•�MVATE UTUTES R ROW 5 1O 40EWALK ORAMAEE t UnMiT' 0.5' 1 EASEYFNT BOUIEVARO E 201 'OPE O . ... .. w. O• Call .8 Hwr. D e digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TwIP City Arlin 851-A 0002 Mn. TNI Free 1-800-252-1165 WnDOT 2L50 LVAE1'N® WEAR L911H 1YgDT 4EC =7 WITIWNp15 TAO( COAT —r - MWT 2%D LNIWSSILTIB DA4 OPIRSE —Ir - p 5 AODREDATE BAY. 1001 CNU9IED S10E 2.• WICOT 314.18 91ECT ORADULW Immow —COIPACTM 9..GRAOE (No x..) NOT' P ATE UiIRTiES Wal HAYS TO 9E NfiTA N TRE NOW N S CASES NK TO IETAI WALL REITPoCIIMS D�NJ R1m T><'rrm TR� I �- Plowshares Development, LLC Ams Waw i6fl L.I. DAR Wat, SW590CTvm6NNeN, 18O>Eson SAD RAN NEN FOR 5PEPFIC FOR SRIEWIlI NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Stonefield L-2 2G051O41Pot DWG P.. 10/14/05 SAM ll w 11 - GRADED FOR 6.0' ONOUNO DJYATON AT REM OF N AT REAR OF P PAD TOFINISHFR 10 FRONT CARACE SLAB EliVA1NN. WO, SWO - ORAOm FOR 9.0 • PFF9ENCE iPpR FaS LROLPD EIEVAIIDI Ai PFM Qi PID Lm- FRONT CARA2 4A6 FLEVAIMN. A - WNRar NOTE TE lJ IMMATS TNAT TE GARAOE MAN R -RY 1 'DCN OIi 0.7 FEET KELP/ iK FNST FLOOR ETEVAIbX. >i -SDE WNMVT THE (2) 4NPGAT6 THAT 1HE GARAQ 6 AN ADDITIONAL 2 9.00N5 OR 14 FEET BELOW TE FNtST FLOOR FI£VAnON IYRCAL LOT W Westwood Prdessiord Services, Inc. ]59JA 9/^Or'ne fCm hall MI SS3N NassnanaTss ra sssanaaa Taw_ � 41 �.� rRle�RN RseY a Ti1D PA D+. Err 4M 0.5' DEEONORR 6 iLOW ON SREET TYPICAL LOCAL STRM SEC'PION ', 1& BACK TO BACK) REFER TO PLAN SHEET FOR DIMENSIONS 5: EXACT SIDEWALK LOCATION SEE PLAN VIEW FOR DIMENSIONS R 30' NO C 115' D A¢ E UTNTY 1A.5' EASflIDRT eou"'ARD ��— 201'OPE O O o•�MVATE UTUTES R ROW 5 1O 40EWALK ORAMAEE t UnMiT' 0.5' 1 EASEYFNT BOUIEVARO E 201 'OPE O . ... .. w. O• Call .8 Hwr. D e digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TwIP City Arlin 851-A 0002 Mn. TNI Free 1-800-252-1165 WnDOT 2L50 LVAE1'N® WEAR L911H 1YgDT 4EC =7 WITIWNp15 TAO( COAT —r - MWT 2%D LNIWSSILTIB DA4 OPIRSE —Ir - p 5 AODREDATE BAY. 1001 CNU9IED S10E 2.• WICOT 314.18 91ECT ORADULW Immow —COIPACTM 9..GRAOE (No x..) NOT' P ATE UiIRTiES Wal HAYS TO 9E NfiTA N TRE NOW N S CASES NK TO IETAI WALL REITPoCIIMS D�NJ R1m T><'rrm TR� I �- Plowshares Development, LLC Ams Waw i6fl L.I. DAR Wat, SW590CTvm6NNeN, 18O>Eson SAD RAN NEN FOR 5PEPFIC FOR SRIEWIlI NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Stonefield L-2 2G051O41Pot DWG P.. 10/14/05 SAM ll w 11 °zoos Westwood Pra!essionci SerNces, Inc. Preliminary Plans CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED NOV 1 8 2005 O CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Stonefield Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared for: Plowshares Development, Inc. 1851 Lake Drive West Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Contact: Nathan Franzen Phone: 952-361-0832 Fax 952-361-0833 Prepared by ". Westwood Professional Services, Inc. X99 A w m oni fd.n ».�i. MN 553" Rt lR+Ii7d Project Number: 20051114.00 Contact: Curtis R. Neft. PE Vicinity Map (Not to Scale) No, DATE REVOM SHEM 1 10/20/05 Revised Per City Comments (CRN) 1, 3 k 4 2 11/15/05 Revised Per City Comments (WRW) ALL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Preliminary Plans for Stonefield Chara em, Mlnnaon a 10/14/05 sheet 1 of n 03NNVOS Dim DESCRIP1ON COVER EXISTING CONDITIONS R PRELIMINARY PUT PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PUN PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PUN AND DETAILS PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 8 PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 9 PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION INVENTORY PLAN 10 PRELIMINARY STREET PROMES 11 PRELIMINARY TYPICAL SECTION & DETAILS Vicinity Map (Not to Scale) No, DATE REVOM SHEM 1 10/20/05 Revised Per City Comments (CRN) 1, 3 k 4 2 11/15/05 Revised Per City Comments (WRW) ALL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Preliminary Plans for Stonefield Chara em, Mlnnaon a 10/14/05 sheet 1 of n 03NNVOS -- ftatoml - level d SerNaey Ina PlOp" • Dmotes Orr NmGOPHER STAATETE ONE Set Hare GNE CALL LE-GEW a Denotes Nm Nonummt found Tan EWy Mw 631-464-0002 W. Tal F. i-eOD-zsz-1166 of pot a/ Me Na ox,e ,ower o/ Me Naml ft otter o/ t, mom 2; etaaa p 116 e ' Rape 2J NMC Caw amfx sold Q Damatea Coal /ton Ilmamm/ Fwnd �q, ., ,�a.� llr'r9 WMY o/ qs /Me Me' de el /1'w m0 ae n aoM de eao Ile a ulao 49 9 of " Sgaa carr, o/ sold 6V91/yH16 j'.f 51 UT 1f]HMF.F 6OY 2�'a ri ^�Y No'Mrwwf arts o/ Me Mf Mewf otoYr; glow South 69 deyw W mnaM 4er semeeoe NMC e,, of wvnea a'an9 Me Sovq /M �� MI1ER OtOelAp rW�Y e/+ad Na.M.eef arta mi at N,Mwel area. o dermw W ),, /eee M Ms pone of 8 do,,wp of Me Wle to M omag Ea cv2r�a 1/� �, N� O >Qil/NE N4wr�ne —w� oama p qmw Nara t w SJ mhos Alarm svaaMn Nast, o d4tmw o/ 46600 Mt a•,a. HorM 18 J2 mnafr JJ seconM Ewt o dbtmw o/ JJ6W MC' amw Abq 52dyer all n kalt W mama, NMC o ,stance 0 56 5) Net Mtres N 1 does• 57 Mutes 27 rem da llMt, a ,,,alae of IMM Mr go a po of m Me ,oM H of ea,, NrMeYf stet of M e NpM aV/r S 1'� 'a' a �E ® 11WJ1C CWiltal " —Y`-- S.WJMY ¢lpt aM1ftol 156.0) Mt Ewfrly a/ Me N"aaa, oamr of W N aa,, Outer o/ Me IltMrewt arts ae matured am9 ea,,, NOM Itoe i � 0 J2EcwC Y63' f3 larn llaf tad Mae termnaMg em-51WI SE1iR ,Wl) • VEalYPT PoSI ® FIE w eE1ER lMu,n:IgII —mow-- mDYGK 0WeE10 Mal poet of Me Sa ffimat artr o/ Me NorM oust arts r Sect, 2; rum&* 116. Ran,, 24 dwt8ed w f,,aft. to -elf: Me T �'-t'"f'Cp ® 17=w WNe/nE w M>E � —."~ RIEAIpE utt6aPoav2o north J)S00 MI lm, Nbe my of Me Woo,,,deeabM /nq t, Begnnnq ae a pont M the M" be of sok Saagwl attr of 9tl-RWFlC/112MA ® fIE'C11BC RIIIW 6 NIOMVI Na/Meast atlr (511' 1/4 o/ NW 1/4) ,stmt 649.JI MI NMf o/ Me No -Menet cunt mm,. Mmoo S MreetrlY ,,ealM9 of 'T —r— r� 0 60 120' 160' degrw 42 mnufv 04 momde ,,, ,,,t fo SOUM tan m, No M IMa a difmae of 16J. 19 ,at MmSa ~y de,atip ,o Me ISR ® Wy 60X ® SWfMV YANgE IW ku talo �— epKE J2 deWeae M mnutw J) —do a dletww o/ 12562 Mt Mww S Mwetrly mgmth, to ae %hi 22 dwyase M m ,as 52 Mae a am'"a' of M12J Mt amw SwMsly to Me oa-Newt cant of Me Eaet MM Mt o/ ,he NMt 46A2 Mt of Me S M h Nkp'�[p mlu ® well, p[y r © QRB S lw �,.�,.t� CryUpp1gE,lE S19.) M, of mg, SwMw,t WMr W Me a NarMwvt ,, (Se, I/4 o/ NW 1/4) ea meweed any Me Wast and Ewa Inas of sok f 1 SavgwM are, o/ ae Nrtowwl ares (SW 1/4 o/ NW 1/4), Msxa S lh'unit eM qe yMl Noe of q SwMerl soft o/ 0 {SERC 11W ® g(pel{ MRN gsyy ® wlpp NNepf£ Y (pWpyrb 0WE llE ae /Ia'rhwef at,r ,o Me SwM Yr e/ sok S Mswt aafr o/ Me OW seat arts (SW 1/4 a NW I/4) and ore trmiqrafO �. o�+d++s ro q. yat Mrw/ m de r of fanrd M a. amw W q. •,tory Reetdr, caw r erlx w+nwaea ® wWloate ru ® MRN save OO o+ see r hvrnR xo ® rwaE ry a6r a r2-wRm 22e stool —cm— MWE ry a°>;° NIL'YIL z z 1 A we,a an� '' raid" 9 ,o qe pee ,nese m M m of .rad h Mr orrtc• or Mre awry R �+w: ctw cmnM ID us rrtW e 5 * wax —ar*-- us u Abs wt tv4v2nr9rWdre MW2a,Wxt35 bab I \ I CHANHASSEN $aa �. Pa,321 1' r, % N//moi Jr``E. n�:i vii) l.iivir'ivre: \ '9a ilka. t F IJP % / $I 92 92 ✓ 16 s h9°to� IN S n - g32 1 I I 926 9232 y7p� y \ y' \� ti\\ a iii i I I --,kms- ySN � L AO _\916 Y--4 144 \ �� I I ✓ice / / / z a \ ' _._p6sr4 T Melu urv- * 115 � ✓ / �.K / / / e ur nc 1 \ pas dac eaa2e4 _ h3: I i ✓ / I / $ z , N�rt %. r � � 1 , /"'" yJ2 9yf � 936 / ✓ zY / / �I , \ rine aao • 0� / / �t \„ �� ' \` �✓/ /" 94 9N � � ` 3.7op 6 9a YYestwoodlYok�Strvices,int. Beep �o4r•Nrr e.e..1y Vs r.•wruel �e4y,�ruw YwRw `e` _ I ". itow 301" rome r 211 r3NprneC f= s.. m Plowshares �6mwoDevelopment, Inc Wdes � oe oW Mw=, ane S!0 �W4 h MO Stonefield L-1 2o0al f4EEVI..oYE ,,e,e OA4/06 is 2 w U Bxwfing ConditiomI SCANNW I I I I I I I 50000614 W 150.56 G TOW =I Ano Mau Sade SEwds16 (M hwpw Exleth9 Znin° Furl - Lot X • Sefb«M W R (100 R. n WNets Rd) PMPZnh° RSF - Lt 01th 125 R. Proposed Lnd Use Lor O tx RseXdnfw - Lof Area 15.000 sp.R sever Ordkatan 223t «. - A.bvys Lot Argo 21, q.R a Totd PraposM Lots w OsaM 9b OSaM7 (0=&) I.X& - Fiwt Yard Sel6adr - Sids Yad Ssfbodr 30 R M f0 R Sheet dmnema Wed of. bads of nrrb. -Fes Yard Ssebad' M R AM Sheets 10 how o nd °uttr No P Ofy strgads - fte f ffie 16.5 R - S ft a 510 Fan Suffer s0 2 Orahe°e Md utlity sosamnts Nal M pnedM w realYed by the aty - ROW Hb 60 R - Rood fth, J1 R 9«k -to -Bork T)Pbat Lot (varies) (No Stile) Property Dswro n mar art d Me N oowf arrr of Me N Nwzl arfr a to Me pcht of begMho of Me the a " mhuta 27 asmnA McNt o mtm. of N mhutr .1J eecanda EwL o darns of mhuter w secna XDeL a data. of 4 mhutw 27 eecnM XML o Mot. of I. of said Nar wast OIo'er of Me No-Mws1 Mps uo essf . of me N ~ MN N ro dop sae NSM /he and Mn i ANO Mat Rax of Me SevMesel dletr of Me Twnnb Ifo Rape 24 dandled m ar. XMle1y of Mlo e fosha ohwo l ME t, Me of add Southwood l . a Nalws No We. T fan a ace SwMsnr AID Graf A 9.nndwY FHpy eros V a Me OW thew/ ce ea or of raoad fee -Moo o/ rhe G oto /Iwndr. Las Cont, hfieaa ole Abeb«L I ". 1rYeeYel.rWnWR TVI esO Ne Ne rr-powwo, No Iw.bqU. Y 1ee1� tY Y 1 � ee e.r fuo YAR S� 1 +o ^ ��M� W V �,velO�mentr L•�,a Ye�hVYI>oY �r rNoe...ear�r �eI IP hb-^, meMbl/ ea ,mer! sewela oe0 w.7d v.. " test 1.10. Dtl.e W,*X, s9! w Wia*wwd s � 11A6/06 e✓,, 27 1 rrorr rax.. cw.& , wlm am So 1/1 6 TIE No 114 S 23 RJIRY AVY OA -CE -51C MIIN 2ao' auEIFR DEH3.OPM apmnt. Inc. Nathn F.. I(LSI La4e P-fw MMr Suits 550 LMYR SSBI] �.... E� (95 (952) J61-ORB2 Nbrfwoad Pnebnlond SsrNewt he Stonefield rql Q Hou,* beton d°9Mg. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TeM illy Arw 651-454-0002 W. Tap Free 1-900-252-116° mom nrd nsiwe nd own We Pln o -e approxbnotE Refr b Me Fhd Plat a eappMYq data fa exact at dhnnsans < aeaA 62d13 WwR"d Prof.Wd d sw km 1114 Cdl b Hour !.}p1. d99M9: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL • / ^ / / M.. Tdi Fr" 16Ar.5800-~252-�6G ----------�\ / i \ 57 / LLE \ pP D.%.YARM ANO/dl Lcraiq X uRlm (N m �TWIR�MMIMlIIdWIM 6TFtw:r9oi L Aro \ � / i MAadLAN PNPFIRE corARY. / / moroao MTLAIO WI:IAiNp crm) I OUILOrA 42.8J1 4f 00 Srr700/ ° I I �pTN ° I 11 2 1 5 6 w Ld ? 7 Its I 3 9 r, -T r— ---- I �n\i-I xLf) l 11 I p I : 00 m of , \\< ,Y.\ \\\ > _ --J L I , ,,,_,,,.w , , I l I I 1n-ro 2 N "t U tT / \\ i ♦ \ U 0)N \ itI ` Xw \61wI SFNEIR — 1— ., R \ 1 I + 1 + 1 ------- 2 ---- 2 5 6 7 ----- ----- I I —1--- ----1 3j 1 I _ I I I 1 1 1 1 I w,i ` \ I I I I I I I I I J I '/ \\`\ \\ _ '.1,►.,600/.' \ ��i 1 I, 1; ,; I I _� L---� p n 111 I 1 2 I I L___�I 1-____- 9 1 I I 11 �' i ra,a_, ------- LL___ -___J -m / I I01CD UJw wII I feral Utility Notes ' • THE CONTRACTOR I NM ALL ElpsnuG CONd110H5 PRIOR 10 CONSRNCTON I AND NOTIFY THE OWWNERER OF ' ANY dFFFAENCFS I I I • THE RERT SHALL AEmME THE NECESSARY PERMITS Edi ALL WORK W1510E ' OF THE E PROPERTY UNITS I ' ' • SEE ANdI. PLAN FOR CR MDG LOCATOR. SEE OTE PLAN FOR LAYOUT d SONS SERMCE ENTRY LOCATIONS TO BE COdmNAIED WITH 111E ARCHITECT. D L . WARY DMTNG NEAT LOC • EEEV. PMOR TO BEG*"RG WNSTRUC1 R THE J 1 • TEE WATER SERMCE SNAU. 6E NSIALLEO MIH A LM. W 60 FT. OF COLOR. �G CONTRACTOR SHALL \EMFY THE C" As-BIN.T CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO CHECK LOCATION AND MATFRAL TRE SAWITARY SEWER —4— SANITARY SERER —4— WATER —I— WATER —I— AL. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 3 MR OTHERWISE NOTED. HNT. W/VALME f HYD. W/VALME f • THE CONTRACTOR SHAH CONTACT 'CORER STATE ONE CIL' FOR STORM SEE — Gp — STORM SEWER — N — FOR UR TY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO URNtt NSTAULk i UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST. ECHMNQUES AND NESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE 1999 ED. OF THE 'STANDARD UTIUTIES SPECETCATONS FOR WATER MAN AND SEANCE UNE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER p' 60' ,20' 181 I'STANDARDNSTALLATION EC THE CITY OR MGH A AONSTRUOT N' MINN.' AND TO TEE SEPTEMBER 5. 20DO ANON Odi THE CUR ENT ADDENDUM. II TH. DEFCON A TRANS.. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION L-1 awsm•uTVD,.Dw REQUIRED 5, FOLLOW ALL PRO THE CURRENT ADDENDUM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED 10 FOLLOW ALL PROCEDURES AS WTIJNm BY THE LOCAL AGENCY. I �fflllCl I�.nigwYw�l�rM�..w1 PTpliRninsry NiM'9CWOOEI RT�SIOfHI IRC. r+.�..rrw1� wrrr.uWI,sr. Nr� pw r ARP'WItl� Plowshares Development, Inc Stonefield PmXF LM]99A1.P.^prLe R��.s Ninox�M Fe Mxmdm M4 to MoBI Eab Dd. Nat BRI = �, �M utffil' 71/aR/D6 L,..a N. I..A9w.rNr. ehs .WBmsdf �SCAnNEU 3005 y/eebreed Profeeelond See,&", Inc — ------ i \qo \�`0 \ A Y 1 I I \ i I I i i I I � 11 ri II 1 i I, II I I CaN 46 Hours before dpylnT. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TNn Qty area 651-451-0002 W. Toll Free 1-600-252-1166 1 ,_ a M I I ". `rr—r �r /�..l�M�-r 1Pnpued YII89tWOOfI PIOlC551011dlS2MC25,Inc. 4�rr�ei�e�..� r+� 111111111011—` � "`r°`��- a-- - Plowshares Development, Inc. neea o.;,. 1:maaT.stw rr: esa.at,-fesrrer.r r�r 1857 lake Drive West SWR 550 or 11/aHE6 ,� H. 16LS{ t3evhrm, Afianaade 55377 M Stonefield 1 _j / 0. 4V ar 120' L_3 2005"-".TvepJWL u. 10/14/05 - 7 on 11 Tree Preservation Plan .ir 1 a M I I ". `rr—r �r /�..l�M�-r 1Pnpued YII89tWOOfI PIOlC551011dlS2MC25,Inc. 4�rr�ei�e�..� r+� 111111111011—` � "`r°`��- a-- - Plowshares Development, Inc. neea o.;,. 1:maaT.stw rr: esa.at,-fesrrer.r r�r 1857 lake Drive West SWR 550 or 11/aHE6 ,� H. 16LS{ t3evhrm, Afianaade 55377 M Stonefield 1 _j / 0. 4V ar 120' L_3 2005"-".TvepJWL u. 10/14/05 - 7 on 11 Tree Preservation Plan gb / /g96 ao' 9o' 10/14/05 ar �'� u�a ■W ftb� — I Plowshares Development, •• use wa oma Wd sfw wvr.�p1. punLren, Mivomh 353I] Inc .So Stonefie Tree emanon per, C�hrm, te®sor. c 2W5 Westwood Proteaabnd Servku, Mc • Tin Preeervfltiop t�tfl • Leslie De�Y Reddwtka MR )412 ]OSTin 7034 75 7036 108BWa� ]031 036 ]118k ades WRlaw, WRbw Wisw _-Black WBbp WRbe Witter WllW Wil m SareWWnmoas GI. M. Nobs Raeged ) harmed 8 Rarpes T RenewN 8 Rasped t9 X Ranted 8 Renelwed 8 Wnped 2 X IDB ]tI9 71W )151 )152 7153 71M 719 58 speeds. Ba Eller $IIP Maps Sopa Mable Sugg Mope S 5 S ape SavaWWtmad GI. M. MOM Removed 10 Pellg9l 7 Penewet 9 Renmelwed ) Rasped ] Raped 7 sees B 8 TD -8 Spades SavedBbmead Glh Rob IDB Spews we CaL In. Mab 1 IF War AwdlRepmoved GI. M. Neta IDB spadaa SavarTBtsmeos0 GLM. Nobs 9157 Amasic m Renewed 11 10210 Say Mapw Seed ] 1M13 C+eenYWi�Ade 10 10M3 Supe Mepla Ramped B 9182 Cpawaod RBIII,Vd 2/ 10241 Bot Elder Sand 8 10344 AmbecarEm Wmyeed 6 1611 Maple Rasmosed 7 9183 American Flm Rennes 9 X 10043 BMenN fickpry Raemwd T 10315 AnakaeEM Wllloae0 8 TOMS Sugg Maple Homeless 8 ,181 Anacen Em Rernwwed 8 10211 &date lRckwy R9m.N T 10316 GmarVt9M1Xe Aan Reaped t0 tOM6 Sap Mable Rrrasws ) 9185 Aemaken Elm Ramped 12 10215 BMawe Hr3t R¢mped ] t047 Amwkae Elm Penmwed ] 1pM7 Super Maple Remotes 7 9186 Amencen Elm Rennes 8 tOM6 GmeaNNntle MM1 Remoen 11 10318 Geeenuwnne Asn Seed 20 10418 Super Mepb Reneged 7 91)1 Aneedcm Elm Ranted 12 1021] Stas Maple Remoeatl 15 X iM19 Anpdcen Elm Saes 15 10M9 Sugar Maple Renbled 9 9172 Mad nEm Rwmeled 0218 S R w� 8 0350 Ames ca Elm Saes 0 1050 Sum Roasts 7 W il.ry Grana Site Area ]0.k Wil.W Net Sita Ares 17.83 4/ -Ac TNtk WJbw 1Ye0anft 17.80 Ac 7042k WRYa Sleep slopes .1T Abe, W. k Wab Grove Cnmy Cower .0D A, 70M BMck Wbpw Net Can 4.11 k )045 WkWillow, mY 4.69 Aa. ]016 Bock WilFw Steep sl .02 A. 7047 Bleck wllpw Steep alopas Og Ac 7018 Black W illpw TotalBobbins Canopy pvv (4069 (13 X . M = 2)1� 279 7049 Black Willow Total Required Canopy (301[) (17.35 % .30 5.28 Ac) 5.28 A. 7050 Black W11W. Canopy Needed (5.28 M - 4.69 Ac - .58 Ac) .99 �. 7051 Black WilMx Conopy Removed (3.k a, to grade, Iknk IFe) SH >05Z Black Wllkw 1053 B.Ck Wll..r Repincanenl Required (.59 Ac % 1.0 Ac - .59 Ac 7054 Beak Wll.w Canopy raquked dwa axbtF9) .59 k 7055 Bieck WllMsv (3.02 Ac % 1.2 M = 4.13 Ae. Comppy Remosed) 4.13 lie. 7056 Black Wdcw Tots Replacement Required (4.13 M. } ,59 Ac - 30.]2 Ac) 4.72 Ac. 7051 Bleck Wlllmr Required Trey (4.12 M. x 43,560 S7 = 205,803 W 1089) 189 T. ]1161 Bleck W9bw Landeta a Traps ProMded 7073 Bw E.a p 189 Treace 7074 Bea Elder 7075 Anacin Em )078 Nnencm Em Tai) Anakn Elm 7078 Amakae Em 7079 Amsdtae Em 7080 Amwkal Ekn MM AmMcae Exp 7083 Bw EMa 709 Bw Elder 7091 Amaicen Elm 7085 Anmakam Em 7008 Amenkan Em ZiOO Proaoeon Detafl 7080 BXleme Wk 1 7M1 Amar Elm 1. Prnxg •il M erne by 7002 AnedcamEm perm'vnp. dere, mpmrioM 709 Ba Elder prvnly mneme iM4 Eabm had Cela 2Rr .mageamrlwboe 7095 Anemcen Eta Dew Nem Cwlenurlkn obseti 5n .1 momnsY. w ]080 Amalrae Elm onnm Location re Mrrm -1 `nt rl any n all 7(D) Bw Elder HIO" Hnlr are rna�ha Slyke envy e' mpaknenrt .(pout opproSW In n1iNp nem 7080 Amaken Em _ one CItY. ]M9 8mm Ehler 19te yaCmg to be drm only )100 Aenaken Em - orfs p.rlectlw mm.um now 7101 Amwk:ao Elm .sen g loo cttr Fm approve )1W Aneekal Em !� •Yin fnmg Iare ma II me5ralm ewe. beeneneewm are 7103 AmakeneEm tin pewrWlin teem"""" )101 Bw EMen ' T' Pmt n Ewd 710] Bassteptl wCmeWcOonbx� Peel steed Ewy fi' 7108 Aerencal Elm 7109 Bassttmd 7110 Bassmwod til Basaood ]112 Bw EXlar 7113 Bw EMar )114 BIBe wll Kckory ]its sasseood 7116 Bass tad 7117 Manowetd 7118 Baaaaod T?itsin 5 Mope 7121 Bw Elenr 7121 $upar Maple 719 Sugar Mase Tim Sugar Mase )121 S May 7125 SuW Mope 7128 asp Myr 719 AemwddcaeEm TIM Maple Tt2g Ras ask 7130 7131 Ammkm ]132 Mable 71M Say Mepb )131 7135 S Maple 7136 Say Mab. 137 Supe Mage 7139 S Mable ]139 su M4 a 71a0 Bw Elmr 7141 BelElder 7112 Baslpol 7143 S Maple ]144 Basamd )14S Bplenw TRckay 7148 Ewa Elea -ft0 Baewaad sac Eller Wpposel Rareogd Romped hanepeed Rasped Rained hmbled Rammed Remweed Rammed Rammed Reamed Rained Renewed Ramped paneled Rained Raeelwed ROnpat Seed Seed Seed ^ Spm Swed Saes Septi SM Saved awed Seed Bested 90eed Seed Seed Seal Swed Rained Beed Sews Sawed Seeetl Soled Seed RBlllaewt Worded Renoed Ramped Rented $wed Seep Swed RBnpeO Seed Ramped Penmep Renewed Rasped queued Renewed Renpwd Renmwl WnlOeed Reaped Raveled Ramped Ramped Farmed RenasN Rerobed Ramped Renp1B] Rasped Ramped patted RBnbleO Rambled Renewed Renmwed RenmeO RenmeO Reaped Renewed Renewed Renewed Panned Renewed Renmped Wwp. Rayed T 7 ) 14 8 8 ) 8 7 6 a 7 9 T 8 7 17 M 9 b M 13 12 8 7 ] 8 10 B B 7 ] 6 9 10 9 ] 8 8 9 9 11 9 10 6 1 8 9 6 6 8 25 11 -i-T- 9 8 13 7 7 10 6 B 17 0 6 6 7 6 B 6 25 12 6 13 7 12 23 12 8 8 6 8 11 8 7 6 8 6 8 10 % X W % X X % X % X X 715] 3 MAIM ]150 Bm ERer T18B goal,F Had Cebu 9068 Aeemakm Em 9089 libi 0970 BVGk 9021 Ba Olt 91172 Bapk ,075 Sup 9076 Sugar Mega 9pT7 Mable 8078 Supe on Sugar Mylar 9000 3 goal S 9002 Say Mab 909 Say Mable 9084 kayo 9,115 Anakae Eye 9088 3 906) 9086 3 Mable 91[88 St10ar MyM 9090 Sup Mope gosl Sugar Mable 9M2 MOpb 8193 Mable 0081 Smp Maps 9025 Seas Mai 910,8 BMOak 9097 Ba 8026 Anakan Em IF160 G SEM 9101 Bw Elsa 9102 Sugg Myb 919 Amykao Ekn 9104 Amek;ae Elm 9105 SuperMyM 9106 Amencac EM ,101 S uy Mable ,100 Amencm Elm 9109 Rin Oak 9110 S rMese 9111 Nadi Oak Ill Red! Wk m1J Mable 9114 Mair Em W15 Supe Maple 9118 S'I� M� g117 3 8118 ups Myie 9118 3 Mable 9120 S Mbpp 9121 Ba Oak 919 Macer EM 8123 Ammcen Em 9124 AneMal EM 9125 Maple 9126 m9MiM 8126 Baps 9129 Bea ORa 91W Sager Mope 9131 9132 gin Mable 9134 9135 Bal Elder 9136 Ba WJi Bw 9130 Mable 8139 Mspa 9140 Reek Wd Em 9141 3 9142 GeaJIYIeM AM 9143 Am 914/ Was Mepb 8148 W47 9118 S Mable 9M9 S 819 S 91st s Mable 9161 M9 Bin Easy 915! RM pet 919 Anakm Em ,155 Caltwepad Seed 8 Ranmw9i H Saeed 9 Renewed 10 harped 6 Released 6 Ramped 13 Wnpwed 7 Permed 11 Rasped 17 7 Renlewed 8 Rooted ] Raped 8 R911mwtl 9 Wneled 8 Renpa1 6 Romped 8 Pnew.N 8 Ramped 10 Pentodes 8 Penloled 7 permed 8 RBneed 7 Rarpwd T Renuased 6 Ibnwed 7 Rnpa1 9 Rasped 7 Rebased 8 Wnlde9] 9 Waned 0 harped 8 Ramlwed 6 Raveled 1 Rested 9 1bnXAed 11 Renmp9d 9 Rained 8 11 8 Rentwed 9 RaepeO 14 Renewed 6 PertaseO 15 Roamed 6 WnopeN Wnowed B Rammed 0 Rnpled 6 hmppd 6 Wnmde0 7 Rmbled 10 Rasped 8 Wnmed 12 Renasad 11 Wnased 8 Ren 7 Reaped s Renewed ti Ren weed 10 Formed B PemOied 10 Renewed 8 Mpeed 10 Ralewed 8 Released 7 Rasped 7 ) 7 lbnpe l 0 Mmp5e0 8 Harmed 8 Renewed a WneOeM 9 Rasped 11 Rasped 0 RON a Raped 8 ) Malawi 8 ) Wnased 7 Penned 7 Ren plad 7 Ranted 10 Raped 21 RenVId 13 tipped 18 % D % % 9173 Amadeu Em 9171 A;; Em 9176 S Merle Harrowed 12 Renaswed 7 Renewed 8 10249 BXIanrA hick 111 S Maps, 1Vd1 3 Mylar Saeed Renewed parasad 9 10 6 10351 Bw Elder 10352 Bw Einer 10:153 Bw Elder Saeed Saes Seed B 17 13 10451 S.O.M# Paneled 7 10152 Buy Mable Ranted 8 1019 Atmkae Elm HMped 8 D 91)8 S M Remeed 0 X tO2a B Mope Raepee 7 10381 Berm Elder Beed 7 10151 Sugar Myb Renewed 6 91]91 GemYWrall Asn Ramped 11 10253 Suer Myb Rambled 9 10355 Amental Elm Seed 11 10155 S Myb 8 9180 CwaMWIkh Reaped 13 10254 S Mepb Renblwed 8 10356 GrcerJWNb ASM1 Seed 9 10156 Say Mab Ruined 9 8181 M Renewed 6 10265 saw EMa RameoLtl 16 1415] Aerestn Em Swed 6 1015) Sugar Maple Reaped 25 9182 S Map. Ramped 7 loss S Rapped 8 14456 American Em Seed 6 10158 CweaNYntle ASM1 Raemaeed 9 9183 3 M genpwtl 7 10257 Su,wMaple Seed 7 10359 Armed. Elm Seed 12 10159 Say Maple Seed 29 9184 3 Maps Removed 8 10258 Bw Elder Saps B 10280 Amancm Elm Saeed 11 10480 S M Renewed 9185 Super Mable Rammed 7 10259 S uy Myb Saes 6 10381 Amencan Elm Seed ] 10161 GeeeneA'IMIa Nn Seed 12 9188 Maple peableed 8 10280 Maps Sand 8 11162 Amaken Elm Seed 7 10182 S Maps Saved 6 9ie) Amps Elm Rained B 10281 Bin Elder Seed 7 1039 AmeM'se Em 9ae0 9 X 1048) CYeBedWNb AaM1 Swed B 9188 Maple Rented 10 10292 Sap Mage Seed 8 10(61 Aearicene Em SeeO 8 1064 BmweoO Seed 8 9109 Mable lienpeed 7 10283 Bin EMar Seed 8 10385 Bin Elder Swed 17 % 10488 WOOek Saeed 12 9190 Mable Rambled 7 10181 S Seed 6 10386 Armaskae Esn Seed 9 10486 Res Sward 9 9191 Maple R9nloed 7 102(3 S Mope Seed 8 1M67 Ared,ori Seed 13 10187 Saeed 6 9191 3 M Rreped T 10266 Bin Clear Saeed 11 1[080 Aeagan Elm Seed 10 10168 Rtl Oak Swed 30 .off 8 8193 3 Mab. Renblwed ) Bin Ekla Seed 10389 Amakh Elm Beed 0 10489 BXMmp honed 8 9194 Mable Releelei 8 loss 7 10288 3 M SeeO T 10310 We arYV/M1Ne Asn t5 X lasts Bi1Mwe Hdwy Seed 10 9195 SepM Renae0 8 10289 Red Oak Seed 15 9196 S M Renas.Bd 6 10270 S Mope Seed 6 10372 Mento Elm Med B 10472 kaawUd Saed 11 % 9191 3 M Ramped ) liam S Maple Seed 8 10373 M e Reneoetl 6 10473 Red Oak Ranwwes 11 9188 Say MapM Reneged 7 1028 Bw EMr Swed 10 t1f/{ Anpdcn Elm ((need 0 10474 S Maple Renewed 8 9199 Myb RampeO 6 1OZ73 S Raimww_ 8 1975 Aemkm Elm RBIrpBO 7 I.-. Bw Elsa Renewed 23 % 9290 Sep Mope Ramped B 10221 9211 3 Mabee I Ramped 6 10275 S asp Mable y 14177 GmaYWtkM ASM1 Swed 12 16112 Berm EMa Remgwd M gam Mage Rwrwed 8 102re s Mope Itaepee0 7 10376 Sieenbn Elm Renmwed 12 16114 Bin Eller Repbletl 19 926 Eeebn Ren Cemv Ramped 7 10TH S Mega Poples i 103]9 CAeweWMb AaM1 Formed 10 IM15 Baa EMar Released 8 % 9204 Awaken Em Hanesed 9 10270 Sugar MI Renewed 7 10(60 Bin Elder Reaped 9 18118 Anedram Ern R3111wed tt 9205 Mancae Em Wend 10 10278 Bea Eleer Rammwed 9 10381 Amalcan Em Renewed 9 16117 EIOer R9newed X 8508 An.dcan Elm Rene ed 8 10]80 S Raveled B 10382 Bin Elder flamed 8 18118 Amascan Ebn Ramped 10 8207 Wd OMt Rennes ) 10281 YanateOE Renmpress 11 1164 Ge hft Asn Rwnded 6 16121 Bin Eder W_mpeed 2{ 10985 GreardWM1MerM Seed 6 18121 EMa Rmpea 18 9212 Eaelem RedECma Ramped 8 X too 3 Pike ) 10388 Bin Elder Spm 161M BeckEN Wnewat 17 We % 9215 Elm Rasped 8 1p254e SyWMyb _Rasped 7 Supr Maple Renble0 ] 9 146] S Maple Std H 18tTJ Bin EMa Paneled 1 Says, me 905 Maple Ramped 8 10388 s Maple Seed ] 9216 Sugar Mal", Ranted ] liM5oss, 10286 $agar Mage Re regpd 38 3 1469 Basswood Saps 22 II Buy Maple Rammed 6 10289 Geeau'Wnye Asn Rarwcs 21 10390 Maple Baps 6 Tin Tmw .M. 5098 Wit Renewed 8 9018 MyM W1pA1 B 102901 $agar Maple Ranted 8 10291 Sugar Maps Ranmad 8 loot Ammcan Elm Saps 7 10392 Amacm Elm Swed 10 Total Cal. In. Ibleayad 3791 9220 S Mope Released 8 10292 Sugar Maps Ramped 7 Tooae Sugar seed a 891 S Mable Rained g 10193 $agar Mage Remowep 7 1094 GrttrvWhX- Asn Shad 10 ]OMI GI.In. Bavad 1318 9012 3 Mepb ROneeed 8 10284 $ r Mage Ranoed ] 1M95 Bwsaoo0 Seed 7 89.3 Renewed 7 10285 Sugar Maple Renoed 7 1166 Geo hm Asn senN 9 991 3 Reneged 6 10295 Sugar Maple Renew. d 6 116] S Maps 88x1 B 905 Saba Mable Wnped ] 1� GmeJWHle Aon harped 10 1968 Greavwnmp Asti Seed 0 998 Say Myb Ramped 37 S 10296 Rammed 41 D 1999 GreaVwnie Asn seed to 997 S Maple Philippines 6 1. MBpb Poetess 30 10100 S Maple Sawed 5 998 S Rased 0 1 Bw Eben Narrowed 6 tas01 Bw Elder Seed B 91]18 Remained e Reapped 11 lost �E�10.2 CNeerYWMe Am Rmpee 15 S� Mable paruake0 8 1902 Red Oak Reaped a x 10103 $ Maple Sa.tl 8 9211 CseaNYnOe Asn Removed 1J 14303 Anacin Em Rmowtl 9 10101 3 M Renewed 0 9112 GreaWJnile Asn Remawed 6 1464 Red k Rmmed 8 10105 GreedwM1Re Asn Seed 14 9233 Areakn Elm Renewed 11 1465 Amaltan Ern Rmeoee0 8 101106 GreeNWnXe Am Seed 10 9241 Aemkan Elm Ramped 12 10308 Aenaltae Em Henle d 8 101% BXawA Mckay Swed 8 91!35 GImYWMta Asn Rammed B 10306 Analcar Ekn f4mpe0 8 ipmg ygy MyM ) 9216 S Rmpwed 6 10909 kiwi-. 9; Mrped 9 1. s Swed 8 Note r. X - Spill: T. D - Olaewad/T1amWtl Trw S - Spookiest Taw Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Mnla ioCity54-0002 ll yFree o18B004252- 66 Dae 10/14/05 Bmc 9 DE 11 9237 Harped 6 1910 Bat EIOa Raped B 10410 Toweled Sewn a sops Maple Rmbled a 1911 Bw ERa Ranted 21 X 10411 Maple Seed 7 9239 Wnmad 7 1912 Maker Em Ramped 6 1as12 SaprMeple Seed B 9020 klapla RenpLN 32 3 10313 Amakm Em Rpnoed 18 10413 Sova Mable Renewed 0 9241 Sugar Realeet 7 IM1{ Areakam Em Ramose[ 7 10411 S Maple Saeed 7 9042 Mable Renewed 6 10218 Amakae Ekn Pontes 6 10415 GreenYWM1pe Am Ramped 8 92{3 Say Male Rammed 7 1916 Ameh:en Em Ranted 8 9TH S WrtpeBd 7 1M17 Bova Elder Rwnvol 11 10417 GIykWMle Asn Rentwed 6 10215 8 WRlwed 9 1M18 MwmicalEm Werevm 0 10418 Ca®✓WM1XS Asn 9aed 10 1M16 Rwrmded ] 1M19 AnMcao Em Rained 8 IM19 GyeaVWnXe Asn Rneed 8 10217 Baweaad Renewed 10 11110 Bab Elder Rnele, 11 10120 S M 1@16 B9bwa1MA Rempead 1081 C4ea0WmeAm R9mbled 10 lastl Sugar Maps Narrowed 7 10219 Mega Reaped a 10322 Arrmaken Elm Ranted 7 1049 Gree Mint. Asn Mrmad i) Tom Mabee Penasal 0 1039 Amakam Em 6 10423 Ped Car Renewed 8 10221 Box Eber, Peeped to 1=4 Bw EMar Rennewed 6 10124 Caeavwnne All, FpnweC 11 1029 S Myr Pmped 7 tM25 Bre Elder Renewws B 10425 S rMape Reamed 1 1022) S Maple Renewed 6 IM26 Bal Elder Rempeed 7 10118 S lWitl S M Renlde0 6 10327 Bova Eller Rained 7 1012) SugarM de Seed B 10225 3 Maple Reneweed 8 10328 Ade Rained 8 10128 Sager Maple seed ] 10228 Suy Mable Reamed 0 10329 Geanek4RRM AM Werewed 10 10429: Sugar Mapa Seed ) 1097 S Mable Penned 6 10X30 lieaYWMe Adm Ramped 11 10A30: Sugar Maple $9104 16 % 1MM $ Mab Reseed 9 1 1 Amaral Em Pinatas 130 10131 C9seNNlule App Swed 12 10229 S Renewed 6 10932 GmeadWMe Am Ramped 7 ias32 Owv`NM1M Am Swed 8 1026 9 Renewed 6 10333 Anaeae Elm Ramped 8 10133 leeeNWNY Am 8 10211 Elder 7 10334 Anmas En Removed 9 10134 Sap Myb Seed 9 10232 Ammaltm Em Renewed 1) X 1M35 GeeadlWMe AM Renewed 12 10136 S Mepb Seed 6 1029 Anlaex:n Elm Rasped 7 loss Amalcn Eke Ramped 11 10436 loaned Sward 8 _0234 Bw EMa Resumed is 1=7 l market Em Ranted 11 1037 s Swed ] Se1e0 8 IMIS GrSi�nEIlsbe Min 10430 6 1� Aneaorn Elm IDIS Peeped 11 0159 S 1023] Anakm Em Saeed 7 X03. American Elm Harped posermelle Rammed 1,114,10 Sap ME 1M3a Bw Eka Seed 11 10341 fieaVWnie Asn Renes 11 10141 Maps7116 tODB Rwrgepp 7 _WQ Amakae Elm Renlewpd 11 .112 3 Mope 1W Vftt mod PreiessiDllal Services, Inc. 756 Are9am Dee Film Pet♦la kN sS3N 7lsmee lII-i7TAlM Pacpy.aTT.eQ2 naws-wses.vrTeF -ter b.1_ we.. _ pippMed tar: Plowshares Development, Inc. -- im tete DATe West, sgil 550 aewl _h - peml� i1311moM 59 Stonefield Tree Preservation Inventory Plan Inc DATUM00 6LA'V 610. 10+00 LP. ELEV a 931.19 LP. STA = 6+91.13 PN STA = 6+65 PN E 925.00 A.D. = 15.36 K 21.15 6+00 T+00 OSPREYLP STQAV , 928.15 06 PN STA = 13+00 PN 0" 927.93 A.D. - 230 K - 13.50 100.00' VL °4i m 4 11+00 12+00 17+00 1"00 15+00 eCiywoV rR*vMtl[eVEPs, Inc. TVI �IrYw�r�tl��i1 YwYe werrr iee� I �4 Y(� nm way.. wrw es e'Ha Arm faOYL !a rK.s+muea+r ra fe.saw>o2 er. NLLD6 u..r w �� 32+00 33+00 > +00 PIPE LINE PN STA 20+00 PN ELEV = 9321D A.D. = 6.31 K = 41.23 260.00' V I UI b HOon bola.* dg*g GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Tw O6! Ano 651-151-0002 W. TO Fr 1-600-252-1166 16+00 17+00 16+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 11,00 STREET A NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0' S0' 100' 150' Ors 10/WOS Afire 10 ae 11 �. Plowshares "plowshares erw waw Development, Ina Stonefield Sc1� Profile Pim 161 Leie Delle Wet Sub. MO r d.r wr ow"ABae 56C m6hr mw� IA = OUOEa Fqf 5.0 IPFELFlILE FROI FNI91 OtOUIID EIEVATOI AT Mla LF PAD TO iRONT GARKE SLAB EIEVAMN MO, 500 QACED FO1 5.0 IIFY'DIQICE FN1M RNL91 fFWND 6EVAlIO1 AT NFIA OF PAD ro PAONr cAnwEE s/a ¢EVATa. A - W W7 NOTE " 1O°Ia^ • -aYA TIE (I) INDICATES THAT THE GARAGE IS AN A TR 1 fi AT fq 0.] FEET BRON TIE E1f$i Rpdt Fl£VATpL !o - 9.F M4%gl7 TE 3 INpCA f THAT THE M IS AN TONAL 2 EILOOES M 1.4 FEET FDDW THE FNST FLppE E(EVATRI. TIPICK L� OE.;& 6P FEDW ON sWrET DINMMMIE tEEEUIV EA6E1l1R O 0 O •�MVAM UTILITIES WOAEVARD zoW saPE WI 48 Nalre NWare ElggNy. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL T•Yi City Area 6s1-194-0002 Mn. TNI Free 1-1W 252-1166 TYPICAL LOCAL STREET SECTION (31' BACK TO BACK) REFER TO PIAN SHEET FOR DIMENSIONS t EXACT SIDEWALK LOCATION SEE PLAN 1AEW FOR DIMENSIONS a K —50' ROW 50' ROW a —19.8' MS5 9"E" 2 OAAMA� t U1lITV EA42O T BOXEVAFU %OPE Laa LI -1/r- MICDT :1351,LVE.9Dm .F/1I a �gL PLAN NEW FM WFQRC ,.Z iHT 111111YMQI5 MIX QMT Silk FM SID ALK —r - N 2360 LWIW150J06 BASE LONSE —1r - QASS 5 AIXm"TE B/.4 Im 011gm aIYE —W MN20T SIRE® Sl E OWIUM fiUaNW —NPACIFD AWi]LF (xo SWeJ NOME. PIWVATE U1LliIES WAL HAW W E NSTAIIID N THE NIW N SOME LASES [ARE M AETANNIS WALL rESTNc1Iu2s. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 12 3L051aaan+Otlw 10/14/05 . n a n !A ;W Stonefield Preliminary Westwood l S`"`� Inc.. ,.._....2 Plowshares Development' Inc. Grading Details n»aw+ o I I m I ffiS1 EAw Dx1w WesL 9W .90 EMr' h+r! AN 553N a.wr: xz-nzsaEa Sac aum]auz ,,WW WE4z`_ 4,11111111wrrt rr Ch._A. Mimsoh SSil7 ch..h . MImDOEz ,,.�,IFJ lOT NODI Fl£VAT W 99 Tar NMAWI mAalAr[ ARgOW 9 NSI. FDSiI OqM EIEVATIIXI AT EM ! Pb LO Na (E APP(NAfi(E ) O�� ASEYFNT ROOT 1 FIEVATd / fFd1T CMA4E 4AB EIEVATLN INOZORN AS IT AS IIII�IILI _ EAN • //\ FILTO IA = OUOEa Fqf 5.0 IPFELFlILE FROI FNI91 OtOUIID EIEVATOI AT Mla LF PAD TO iRONT GARKE SLAB EIEVAMN MO, 500 QACED FO1 5.0 IIFY'DIQICE FN1M RNL91 fFWND 6EVAlIO1 AT NFIA OF PAD ro PAONr cAnwEE s/a ¢EVATa. A - W W7 NOTE " 1O°Ia^ • -aYA TIE (I) INDICATES THAT THE GARAGE IS AN A TR 1 fi AT fq 0.] FEET BRON TIE E1f$i Rpdt Fl£VATpL !o - 9.F M4%gl7 TE 3 INpCA f THAT THE M IS AN TONAL 2 EILOOES M 1.4 FEET FDDW THE FNST FLppE E(EVATRI. TIPICK L� OE.;& 6P FEDW ON sWrET DINMMMIE tEEEUIV EA6E1l1R O 0 O •�MVAM UTILITIES WOAEVARD zoW saPE WI 48 Nalre NWare ElggNy. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL T•Yi City Area 6s1-194-0002 Mn. TNI Free 1-1W 252-1166 TYPICAL LOCAL STREET SECTION (31' BACK TO BACK) REFER TO PIAN SHEET FOR DIMENSIONS t EXACT SIDEWALK LOCATION SEE PLAN 1AEW FOR DIMENSIONS a K —50' ROW 50' ROW a —19.8' MS5 9"E" 2 OAAMA� t U1lITV EA42O T BOXEVAFU %OPE Laa LI -1/r- MICDT :1351,LVE.9Dm .F/1I a �gL PLAN NEW FM WFQRC ,.Z iHT 111111YMQI5 MIX QMT Silk FM SID ALK —r - N 2360 LWIW150J06 BASE LONSE —1r - QASS 5 AIXm"TE B/.4 Im 011gm aIYE —W MN20T SIRE® Sl E OWIUM fiUaNW —NPACIFD AWi]LF (xo SWeJ NOME. PIWVATE U1LliIES WAL HAW W E NSTAIIID N THE NIW N SOME LASES [ARE M AETANNIS WALL rESTNc1Iu2s. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 12 3L051aaan+Otlw 10/14/05 . n a n !A ;W Stonefield Preliminary Westwood l S`"`� Inc.. ,.._....2 Plowshares Development' Inc. Grading Details n»aw+ o I I m I ffiS1 EAw Dx1w WesL 9W .90 EMr' h+r! AN 553N a.wr: xz-nzsaEa Sac aum]auz ,,WW WE4z`_ 4,11111111wrrt rr Ch._A. Mimsoh SSil7 ch..h . MImDOEz ,,.�,IFJ lOT NODI Fl£VAT W 99 Tar NMAWI mAalAr[ ARgOW 9 NSI. FDSiI OqM EIEVATIIXI AT EM ! Pb LO Na (E APP(NAfi(E ) O�� ASEYFNT ROOT 1 FIEVATd / fFd1T CMA4E 4AB EIEVATLN IA = OUOEa Fqf 5.0 IPFELFlILE FROI FNI91 OtOUIID EIEVATOI AT Mla LF PAD TO iRONT GARKE SLAB EIEVAMN MO, 500 QACED FO1 5.0 IIFY'DIQICE FN1M RNL91 fFWND 6EVAlIO1 AT NFIA OF PAD ro PAONr cAnwEE s/a ¢EVATa. A - W W7 NOTE " 1O°Ia^ • -aYA TIE (I) INDICATES THAT THE GARAGE IS AN A TR 1 fi AT fq 0.] FEET BRON TIE E1f$i Rpdt Fl£VATpL !o - 9.F M4%gl7 TE 3 INpCA f THAT THE M IS AN TONAL 2 EILOOES M 1.4 FEET FDDW THE FNST FLppE E(EVATRI. TIPICK L� OE.;& 6P FEDW ON sWrET DINMMMIE tEEEUIV EA6E1l1R O 0 O •�MVAM UTILITIES WOAEVARD zoW saPE WI 48 Nalre NWare ElggNy. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL T•Yi City Area 6s1-194-0002 Mn. TNI Free 1-1W 252-1166 TYPICAL LOCAL STREET SECTION (31' BACK TO BACK) REFER TO PIAN SHEET FOR DIMENSIONS t EXACT SIDEWALK LOCATION SEE PLAN 1AEW FOR DIMENSIONS a K —50' ROW 50' ROW a —19.8' MS5 9"E" 2 OAAMA� t U1lITV EA42O T BOXEVAFU %OPE Laa LI -1/r- MICDT :1351,LVE.9Dm .F/1I a �gL PLAN NEW FM WFQRC ,.Z iHT 111111YMQI5 MIX QMT Silk FM SID ALK —r - N 2360 LWIW150J06 BASE LONSE —1r - QASS 5 AIXm"TE B/.4 Im 011gm aIYE —W MN20T SIRE® Sl E OWIUM fiUaNW —NPACIFD AWi]LF (xo SWeJ NOME. PIWVATE U1LliIES WAL HAW W E NSTAIIID N THE NIW N SOME LASES [ARE M AETANNIS WALL rESTNc1Iu2s. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 12 3L051aaan+Otlw 10/14/05 . n a n !A ;W Stonefield Preliminary Westwood l S`"`� Inc.. ,.._....2 Plowshares Development' Inc. Grading Details n»aw+ o I I m I ffiS1 EAw Dx1w WesL 9W .90 EMr' h+r! AN 553N a.wr: xz-nzsaEa Sac aum]auz ,,WW WE4z`_ 4,11111111wrrt rr Ch._A. Mimsoh SSil7 ch..h . MImDOEz ,,.�,IFJ A, �.-r... fs �..'�i�.4y �� +�►� '0" Li'l -Vol �x //-�'..+ ei 1 ' r"—r".,\ '•' r/, �\sem\.J,�! ,� ti _\� �,_ \ '`T NOL, II i ~k6-64 � T ' ► r i oo AA • . z ye ISO 1, If, fir, t7l y T I / I - y �`��J - .yam, 1 .�f �i(• � I� L. .1 r.40 1 If VA JL of �) kih�/-a Sf V o ~� r .ftAN I 0,0001 0 i4 (joi �1 AS � � _ ;�. � ! � IX 11 � • � � , � � �` ✓ - �� s t' VNI ------ •y Al L +� ,yi e � w • ` Yk,� � `� _ 7 • .�-� Fes" - �' � trif '`� - _