The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-25_2016-25 PUD OWNER LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENTa rd Mir § �i�lf\{/ §!!! |!!;! ■;!! � §! , !) ! }§/}! Z W q m C E a d C d d U r £ N W E C N d O O O 9 O Q O g C d E W C g d J O L A E q u p n 3 z V a L ICC N V C 6 F J> V y C u E E aE ` E—v A@ a q R? S a E o V O a W nm u c EL' c u dp' _ S E M O c Q :: d € C a o 0 0, 5 E ` E J a i O ILe 3 �' 3 d 9 n g E E w n m'TO' °' we E. E a d g q Q d'cYv C T d C V EV Z Lyn L L w n a m o q t E E T u d �E3= Ena �osi 59€ 3c^ C Es' L Yw C Ole d C dYY % 7 p G v C C N V to v dcv y € i w a� p E a qY w «s � c = P d Y 9 w C C r C N L IR $ .� •C O 01 J C C N u « E E E J _ IE z 3 C E Y L T Y t W O d O O E d N d V b u e c a« O v 0 = t n w E o c8L5 E v«16 d d gyvV V L Y M N Z W A ■ k d G | § F § k � z W Q k\k,k !§||f - ){ |}$}\ !- //|;i : Ek \{E/} r.2Vo 'S kik k k0l22) 1.2 ( �}\}(\ �) { \ { /) �{ \ \{} ! -\|e«5! !\\$` I -- ! a !!! &, ■ k d G | § F § k � z W Q U I N W J W Z VI W LLI !F L 4 0 W W Q f yr _ t c d a. d . a d d c✓ d pZ O T d d q y udi d t A C t 4 � L a q C O q T V i C p WE t E 5 p£3 5 Q o £ WU E C _ E Y Z 0. v n i O n �iO V E E F F m E E `o m o u u n V j O K � a I N W J W Z VI W LLI !F L 4 0 W W Q ■ Wz ; � z W Q �- kik$\ \\§ƒ} {} \\ k{ ��/k ) �® !• !. 1! {.2 ' a !;!|z ■ !I! ' Wz ; � z W Q Streetscape Ovetview Amenities within the public right-of-way - and private portions of the pedestrian realm - play an Important role In the aesthetics and placemaking of the Avlenda streetscape: Plazas and public gathering spaces Street/sldewalk character and streetscape elements Bicycle/pedestrian connections Residential courts and other private green space The goal Is to foster a safe and welcoming public realm that will Invite pedestrian activity, promote traffic calming and encourage community gathering. Street trees, lighting and decorative fencing frame corridors and outdoor rooms. Special pavements, street furniture, public an and layered plantings will enhance points of interest and transition. Recommendations Give pedestrian scale to otherwise vast open parking lots, streets and plazas by: • Incorporating boulevard,median, and parking island trees to frame space and provide shade Installing street lighting that meets all safety standards and design criteria, while creating a signature character for this district Providing bike parking and pedestrian conneCions as part of each project within Avlenda Placing benches, seating, wayfinding kiosks and litter receptacles with regularity along trail loops Objectives Creative design solutions for streetscape Improvements should Include: • Streetscape Improvements that provide traffic calming • Inviting streetscapes that balance the needs of automobiles and pedestrians, and draw you into and through Avienda A marriage of building design and streetscape design that encourages active spaces near the streets Street Lights Decorative street lights are desired for Avienda and the developer will work with the City and %cel Energy to finallze the luminaire and pole types. Lighting design: Conceptual Roadway Lighting - BEGA band 77836 (single pole top luminaires) and 77841 (double pole top luminaires) have been chosen for their quality and aesthetic. Conceptual Pedestrian Lighting - BEGA brand 77210 (pole top luminaires) have been chosen for their quality and aesthetic. Conceptual Roadway Llgh ing AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall — 10 0 Y V a t n f N E E 3` E Z Y V a t i 0 i Z f 2 Y V a Parking Overview Balancing the realities of auto-retated necessities and the desired character of Avienda is a significant challenge. The goal is to provide adequate parking; both quantity and location, while promoting new strategies that support the overall needs of Avlenda. Parking will be provided through a combination of onatreet spaces, off-street surface lots and structured ramps to support the mix of uses at Avienda. Parking structures should contribute to the overall character and Image of Avienda. Ramp design should include elements, colors and materials that reflect, or complement surrounding buildings. Liner stores/units or other street level uses should be Integrated Into ramp design. Recommendations Parking guidelines encourage the following: Provide a combination of fencing and landscaping to minimize the prominence of parking areas from Important views Explore options to Integrate stom water management requirements Into parking area design of uses In Avlenda. In addition to providing adequate space, quality design Is crucial. The framework for Avienda encourages creativity, Innovation, quality and attention to detail in the project development, Including parking solutions. Minimum Standards Parking In Avienda is Intended to be shared to the greatest extent practicable in all mixed-use areas. Parking shall be provided under any of the following arrangements: • Shared parking arrangements between nearby uses are encouraged in all subdistricts Within Sub -District i parking on individual parcels serving Individual uses may be provided If designated and approved as part of the master plan Loading Amos Landscaped parking Islands intended for tree plantings must include Loading areas and docks shall be placed on the building's least visible elevation. adequate soil volume for healthy tree growth. Generally, provide one to Loading areas shall be screened from public streets and residential areas three cubic feet of soil volume per one square foot of time canopy area through landscaping and building design measures. Objectives The primary objective is to provide a balance of surface lots, on -street and structured parking, with ample quantities and close proximity to serve the mix AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Over-all — 12 v M d G Q O N Eo• E V y � �� - (j t ✓ V E n 8 y c e v E A N L q r i e u v r $ n u d 8 � E o m T _ u O g p O •q' V p '� V C S N d E °1yEd rv.v^ELya c v V q y a a 50 OEE m =om E a r m uw-i E $ ° a A w; o c - n« - o = % E d B � v C q£ o .°� v y o '. n° ' o E m E u o 1. c- ": oksa E °vim L°ioS S ° c a ° •, d Q` u E 8 n o• E Eno � s � A n A 5 '$ A� O O a i w 3 L g A • iX e V C n t Q d O t q q i' E ,E n' E i E I v m t rn c d o m d L m 5 n u v 3 E c c 3 o v ,Z5 Na_ o �Ls o u - y vy ry q o c i E> n n= .E 3° ` v i n u p Y ,C d, y° '^ « E d a s t o e, `o y e q N c y o o E °' i `d, n H v A V v s m p v g m y o c y u E LL" n a E c E E i L nAT59=-AGN Cc✓«x E!r'T aS yxy SC = m= u A m v u $ m a$ v i S o �' d °' y c E E pL" �Qru�u=>?E E E u'cO n ; c n a v$v3 nP ELG m V. m Q n a- f E u c € i C c g 0 8i' $ c rn s m o E N u E s `A n d Y .$ u E P o g 3 j m 2w m q L rn E` v u°$ OO�u CSL YMOV VV N LN OIO 6YV q�L -..`�� E a y � m9 vaiir �y EL.3 C g_'V s d c co Ec L E q-_ S q C Ol W A s, Y S V T A C V� V C °1 S c u=i YQ 6 iX t 01 •V+ E O n L°- O 'G V C V q °I V C 1] 9«? E q J C m ggrr C o; q n= p E- M= w q a ti 3 E n s G c o b 'au1 V M. E E:O` 8Lc�Qisca am°ZV o�djuV. E qC .2 A u'rQQ - r=� E C .°v �•da 9 $' ? E r .d• «- �u `o c c �t m� _`; c r�'oa'� o % -'•m $ ° i o u oro o wa° vuvq off' =�£ v r'o'-mc=a A T E -n-q' 08 q i of N o dac 3Egi w mn � 2c V A C q D E Y d C d 6 6 yi 9 A O7 V - i 0 O O\ V O 6 m�mS EaXo K 03mvm !`1 F4 YI W 2 J W O 7 Z 0 VI W f Z E 6 0 LU7 W El LTi 4 Y . Ow n o E Y A u V„ V SN V C y V E n l V Y L q N C q n n V 9 L A in — _m u L c �' c tBi pvO E t L Y 3f y L p 0 P y OL E E L° 6 O V y N 0 0 q Y O Ed C o q E c n a y o .. _ J c b EO � Co d crnSt y =ci � c Jt �u`o 0 0 E Eo 0 h c==O1 O vmi ave vii a''= E vmiS a I ru Z W nro,loprwnt Idrntlaretlon,Tym I with RmineA<0a COryI Sign In bndground Inlonn:nbnnl N9naue Standards Signs, Informational The pedestrian oriented nature of Avienda requires unique signage that will build on the design concepts for the development. These types of signs Include street signs and wayfinding signs. Such signage shall be allowed on public spaces as needed to provide Information and wayfinding. No advertising shall be allowed on Informational Signs except for community events. Sign, Development Identification The Avienda Development has a variety of gateways In varying scales. Three sizes of signs address those varying scales: Development Identification, Type l Includes two signs on Powers Boulevard Development Identification, Type 2Includes one sign on the project retaining wall facing Highway 212 Development Identification, Type 3Includes one sign on Lyman Avenue, one sign at the Intersection of Lyman and Powers and one sign at the western entry to the project from Bluff Creek Boulevard as shown on the Signage Plan These signs located around the periphery of the Avienda development are allowed as shown on the signage plan and shall have consistent materials and colon. A Business Directory -I Sign Is allowed as pan of a holistic design coordinated with Development Identification, Types 1 and 2 or as a single freestanding sign on Powers Avenue. The sign shall coordinate with the materlals of the Gateway Monuments. Tenant sign panel may be B st &-O'wlde x 1Whill, up to (3) three signs per monument. &ISInns Dnrnolyl r nu AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall — 15 Sign, Business Directory -2 One sign Is allowed per building in Districts 1, 3 and 4, provided that the following standards are met: The signboard shall be constructed of wood, acrylic, aluminum or metal and shall be architecturally compatible with the style, composition, materials, colors and details of the building • No pan of the sign shall encroach on the right-of-way and Its location shall not Interfere with pedestrian or vehicular circulation • Projects with multiple tenants In a single building shall coordinate project signage as pan of a holistic design. Business directory signs within District 2 should Incorporate the Village brand Identity of Avlenda. Prohlbhed signs The following signs are prohibited: Signs employing mercury vapor, low pressure and high pressure sodium and metal halide lighting; plastic panel rear -lighted signs. Signs on roofs, dormers, and balconies Billboards Back-Ilt awnings Interchangeable letter boards or panels Flashing signs , oi,.,I.,r, I� .. ,..I„tn Irnm F. ^orv. M,.1. 10 Av cnh. Subpi.lnrl MaC jMQTENANT TENANT TENANT ghwC Budnets �Irecloly-3 Sign with multlplefmanb I+elow and Right: Nat, nal Stone MZtedah arP prrfa d for nign bases of all•uIP;. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall — 16 L r m k � � § LU2 LU § § � z W Q \k\ \�E �� } k�� { \ { k\ / } t . «#! Ev- - \\/ - \-- _)\} ` - $ $_{� ƒ�(\ k \ k} E �: )f!!${ k!\//;;» 7)k� §:2 a !,� ',!!r;!|£&,;!|!!' k � � § LU2 LU § § � z W Q Large Tenant Retail Signage Calculations apply to tenants with more than 10,000 Sf of leasable area Signage shall be Integrated Into the architectural features of the (made to which they are attached Maximum signage area is calculated at 15% of wall area for each building I. ,,T,;n.nl F0,111,,,01 Maximum area calculation may transfer to other storefronts, leased by the same tenant to Increase tenant visibility to surrounding streets Wall -mounted signs shall not project more than I0'from the building. Cabinet signs are prohibited. Service/secondary signage maximum area Is 2 sf Tabl.1 M.c Pemnl of Wall Are. WMUAre.In Sgwn Fast (.q. %) lex moo 12% 40+•+.240 11% 1,201-1,800 K 1,1101.2,400 7% 2,4014,20 6% 212141SH YA,netro.R. 276.q. R AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall — 18 § ( k ■ � z W � 0B !!\ •;i, |\ §! k/E§E - `:5E ! - \|{!!! t| !! !!!. !k G !!|! 'E ! { | \ \\..2 ■ � z W � Q V d 4= N V ° „ d EE S Q V d w N V ° „ d S rn m m E m w d MT d v d y E_ m C C y V C Q V d N V „ d y ALL. ogE rn m m E m w d MT d v d y E_ m C C y V C V FL C g O d 6 A 9— a` y u c u 2 a v a ��vAdao " y a w c IL 1 d o O J L O d 0 O Q Zo Y V CLLLC W✓= Q a m m C C w c D u q& g SL a 8 E 5 m Y O S S V w rn� ua V V �i Oiv q T O v �guc C a i n b E vEi n V o d w na' a 3 3 3 Q EE V FS I h W Z J W O 7 V Z 93 'a W D F Z W f a. O J W W Q Q 0 c t p C C � y m L E v a a V 7 � v u n as uu 3Y �:Y Q 0 t E _O E n m N E E E Q 0 2 0 o Q 0 2 z o v a a V 7 � Q 0 U ! Ln lu k 3 § x § § � z W � {! \ xtf\ tk/)! �\ \� ( »!•i! |; ,r - } r.! }{/ !| •kj ) k)\ kk. !;) / !![ k\i}\ \| |{(} J !!•f ^■ { !! :!!|� _(#{| {_ ,! @!|«|« )0 }I )| � - \|!� - _, ,:« -k �; �, •°`�! ! }D§7 }D0 0 to i2 a«; a! ,§ aE !!G! z $ §§{k ' ' ' ' ' !ik| ' ' '2,;. CLo &k/!i lu k 3 § x § § � z W � yamInks R' WIMP 6 v 1h1•µ: i e 4 aM1 1 .43'. BUILDING CHARACTER provlding a creative mix of building types, scales and expressions 6....d parapets ARCHITECTURAL EXPRESSION mntemporary'timeless'design that translates to all aspects of the development AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -Districts — 24 Sub -District I - Office Public RealmlStreetscape The Office Sub -district encourages a mix of large and small floor plate buildings, but Instead of commercial or entertainment, this area of Avienda is dominated by office uses. With opportunities for corporate or medical campus development comes the auto -related Infrastructure -easy access, bigger streets and large surface parking lots. Once again, this suggests that equal attention be paid to public realm and streetscape Improvements that not only accommodate vehicles, but also invite bicycle and pedestrian traffic. Site Development Buildings in this subdistrict should face adjacent streets, with both primary and secondary entries provided to animate these Important facades. Architectural Character Buildings in the office district should have a ground floor level that is visually distinct and proportionally larger than Individual floors above It. Maximum heights for buildings In this district are limited to three stories. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -District I — 25 � z W � §........ (}E \f !§! � z W � §........ !§! � � z W � !§! � ■§� - ;\! ! � z W � \! fl=•- |E\` 0k(, �! - f ! _ - }�® � �/| ( ) k�• ��k\�§ E f}/ {`^ �®�` {k�{ ff{ 0{t /\ ©!E»�l;�| r!& ! e=l, °!!&! \kkEf � z W � Signage Village Project Sign areas: Large tenant signage a1, 15 sf, 4'-0' wide x 3'-8"tall, (1) one sign per Project Sign Large tenant signage 42,8 sf, 4'-0'wide x 2'-0'tall, (2) two signs per Project Sign Village Tenant Signage Criteria: Tenant signage calculations apply to tenants with less than 10,000 sf of leasable area. Maximum signage area Is calculated at 15% of storefront area for each elevation of the storefront. Optional signage allowance on rear elevation. Signage to be no more than 50% of primary entrance. Length of the sign shall not be more than 75%, of the overall tenant storefront measured linearly In width. 5ignage may be calculated for each storefront or elevation facing a designated pedestrian corridor. Maximum area calculation may transfer to other storefronts or building elevations, leased by the same tenant to Increase tenant visibility to surrounding streets. The body of the sign shall not exceed 30' In height. Enlarged Initials, capitals and extended typographical elements (e.g., such as the up and down strokes of'g'and'h; etc.), are acceptable up to a maximum of 36' In height or width. Stacked signage or logos must not exceed 48' In height and must fit other signagecriteda. Potential Tenant Signage — 30•_0* lease eros building frontage laaaar•wrl�laa�an sale Example: Storefront dimensions = 12'-0- x 30'-0' = 360 s.f. x 10%= 38 s.f. total allowable signage on primary entrance Optional signage for secondary elevation(s) = 36 s.f. x 50%= 13 81 Corner tenants are allowed to match primary entrance signage at two storefronts. Blade Sign(s) to be calculated as part of total allowable signage. Blade Signs to be a min. of 8' AFF, may not extend above the cornice line, and may have a max. signage area not to exceed 4 sf per face. Wall -mounted signs shall not project more than 10 -from the building. Cabinet signs are prohibited. 'Storefront' refers to the first 12'above each tenant floor of lease area building frontage with public access. 'Elevation refers to the Port 12'above each tenant floor of lease area building frontage without public access. Office tenant signage will be allowed on a building directory near the primary entrance and ability to use monument signage locations. Design Review Committee approval shall be based on sign design quality, attractiveness, scale appropdateness, and compatibility with the building to which attached. Service/secondary signage maximum area is 2 St. Outlots will be allowed (1) freestanding ground monument within their property that conforms to the overall development materials and aesthetic, with a maximum size of 5'-0' (H) x 10'-0-(W) with approval by the Design Review Committee, AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub-Distnct 2 — V) W Z J W 0 Z u h W 0 f Z W E 6 0 W W W Z W Q Gathering Space - Live/ Relax "Jif.:-:i.,Wi•SW�'I�Rd.-._. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Gathering space related to adjacent retail that encourages lingering, gathering, and connection.This setting identified as LIVE/RELAX Is a peaceful area with small seating groups and options for an overhead canopy, fire feature, kinetic art, calming water features and lush plantings. LNEIRELAX Is comfortable and shady on a hot day and a welcoming platy to cory up to the fire In the cool season. Sub -District 2 — 29 z v N W 0 z z W E d O J W t� Z W f I FBI 51, N Z W Q�/ N M Z LU Q ANIMATED STREET street, providing opportunities to relax and gather AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -District 2 — 37 create new, amactive design and landscape features AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -District 2 — 38 y r� W Z J W O Z WI f Z W 1 O LU c q o L y £ C i0 i y N ~ N W u $ N N t W � Wu IL ('Jin l7 me l7 '3a \ `u Y5T A J E A W S 5l �t\!2 ;0D \ } )!|:® ;; ! m'9 6 E } \[{i �� ! 16:R - {ƒ!` \ \ }{\,R CL}:.-. �h BUILDING VARIETY promote variety of building heights, scales, proportions AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -District 3 — 41 Sub -District 4 - Multi -Family Residential Public ReaimlStreetscape A large preserve area and access to regional trails supply the Informal green space for Avlenda. and more specifically, provide the valuable park frontage and mix of amenities needed to support housing development within the Multi - Family Sub -district. Site Development The Multi -Family Sub-cilstrict emphasizes residential development. To support the proposed housing, a well connected project will link residents to the Village (activity center of Avlenda) and adjacent recreational amenities. Residential front doors will connect with public walks along each of these streets promoting the urban character of Avlenda. Special attention should be paid to welcome adjacent existing neighborhoods Into Avlenda. Architectural Guidelines Buildings in the multi -family housing dlstdct should have uniformly proportional Boon. Architectural expressions on the facade should relate to the units behind and should create a distinct seperation of the Individual units In a generally uniform design style. Heights are restricted to six stories above grade. / \VIE 1 M DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -District 4 — 12 \ k \ k d G § § LU § k � z W Q /} -;a f� §! {!IƒE 2L f!| §k%f ■ 2rl�®!ka! F•!! | M c t!\ ! t{ki$! 2§! !|t k d G § § LU § k � z W Q N W Z J W s u Q D Z PH—] LE f ` ��ii!!!! ;!|! |■!!! ;;)! !| \ | �|\\)} � � z W � S « d N 5. a L — d A r t P« a L O L ry q ti E E Y a i > o T P o g E E E a p JJ Li TJ j P O d E LiC C 4 j O O Y A P L V V :5 a „ ll Oy py t 5Ji g y=y `o E c a E V 0" o W ct�3 TYY�+ o E�'E Z o v J c o f D d o n = i n uj d c EL u y g d G u pp Q a t 3 G Z h W f Z W E 6 O J W W x .'tic « 'o °' r r o• E C E YM' E G a s O d q Y^ E ° J d m� 0 C irTi 2 g V g C r T 4 d J y E Y« C C z d u g d c t v V s n Q m'15 5 s w; P o Q r r E E i E pp E i 9 w$ Z! '" � °"6= S W nn n°cJ qA O. + C « C P A V J J E C A u O c J c n r IE e E p a 9 p n ixcEg9�� E-> E Eai IE E Q IE m-^ Yd E <= nna Ea"o S « d N 5. a L — d A r t P« a L O L ry q ti E E Y a i > o T P o g E E E a p JJ Li TJ j P O d E LiC C 4 j O O Y A P L V V :5 a „ ll Oy py t 5Ji g y=y `o E c a E V 0" o W ct�3 TYY�+ o E�'E Z o v J c o f D d o n = i n uj d c EL u y g d G u pp Q a t 3 G Z h W f Z W E 6 O J W W (. : \ � z W § -80 _ sa \!\ l !)� $- _Z5r;| :- / )}\§)){\(\{})7\ / t||J2{))®°/�\\15 �.: -- 2 a !!tI!$ ' " ' :0! \ � z W § Context Overview Avienda is a unique area within Chanhassen; but It Is a pan of, and connected with, a variety of local, city-wide and regional systems (See Figure 1). Each development project, whether a single building, one lot, or a series of blocks, must provide reasonable links to these systems as a primary design objective. Recommendations To ensure that Avienda takes full advantage of local and regional systems, development should: Provide safe, easily recognized connections to city, county and state trall corridors Make provisions for public amenities and encourage their use Tie into, and Improve, the Chanhassen utility network Integrate with and complement the existing (and future) street framework • Become an integral pan of the city and county dralnage/stormwater management plan Objectives Stormwater shall be managed to the maximum extent practicable to meet the requirements of the watershed, city and other agencies. Where stormwater features are visible, they should support the aesthetic design of the development Bikeways and pedestrian routes In Avienda must be designed for safety and ease of access. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall — 8 Street Hierarchy Overview The Development Master Plan defines a strategy for the layout of public and private streets In Avienda. The sire, type and configuration of this street hierarchy is based on a combination of projected traffic volume, level of service at Intersections, proposed adjacent land use and desired aesthetic character. These guidelines promote a system that balances pedestrian and vehicular use. Recommendations The proposed street pattern reflects an opportunity for residents and visitors to park once and enjoy the shops and amenities on foot. Methods to achieve this Include: Provide a street network that distributes pedestrian and vehicular traffic throughout Avlenda(many choices of travel paths) Promote Improvements that invite pedestrian and bicycle use including wide sidewalks, streetscape amenities and designated bicycle trails STREET 20' AVI EN DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall — 9 ■ U-4 W § G $ § � § ƒ � z W ► � 3 E 't z 0 F � _ a 0 E i a V J 2 Z W v N =' W FR � n Ey C J g' E' e 2 L CC C y c =' E 5 m 3 ;C5 3 i g 0 c 9 w e a n a c v T F � o c m o SQA � asA � 9 35 r c: 0% > E E A° 5 Z v S.p i£ E u$ -8 cE vr,EES gym= c i E Li Aig dQ 9 m „o 0 o Aran =a J u d m W. o C d £ c E .e q « T t?o w a Q > W, e o n g c a y q Z d 3 o v�°� m � x = c a' Ep o m m w a v Z o :v da J a E c y e c L Z w e o Sua 9� .Ji n s o w y £ y C E ca V Y v_ '�- O Y 2S Y C C C C IE: v N =' W FR 24 a m N T V C 9 rn N .- °' E °' EmAAEL c c g L W. E aciE �aE� W E a„ rn g P O C F N OO Q C a£ V 9 y t O h r a« i n O L n O J rn V m J A E E E ay n c gq v eS6'2 E°o�'> LS°ia °c E' n d E w V «— lJ W O. a 3 u d — R C e 5 E y i£ 9 c o o ''O.n'Mc O$ a g u n Y S N C oD n t9 E Q= m zw 3 v N<_ O o` R V 4_ E FF 3 g E:2 Y. w« p 3 �E35 wuEnE c K c rn w «s w �Lc o d -� m i na u Ca s n4 s= 2 «-' y w L O O C✓ N N C L t `% y p J° W L« V 9 J 0`« A C C£ rq° N L p Q O V X V Y O q J V y pp n r n O y� ton rn C d Z q n n c C n °° d a q N E 0 d 4 a0 C y C` N c E m m e i n v E G p „E cn,Eya'a m8 Vmm E m o o'& &' rn`'_ a c y c s o ' n Ew c `o v_ e 9 4 i £ c m° c c u «_ ° rn x m y A o E o a` E o°' n E '- a`« E E£ «o ta'�anum E�>.m� naoa aw min o 4 �' ESx v� 3 4�E v Ev rn°1 ca a nnJ me rn -w y.d p@; P ° Y Q d q o f .. n 9 £ y c E q y c y£ u y F n y E n J 4 u« °' y' £ c p. y � s `og8 i _°>� wow i d E a m E J d d H n S E N voXt �E«9tcv` C Eo�+�° q'g `w� i`o s$.E °' o«fit 4',�m Em 2 o w C T a iX ° d O W O d 0 Yf y y V 4 a J O E J£ v2> E Eq�« m %2'9m4 E y nE EE5 Ed o EaQ qn c uoar_ia E vvpp�i£ a�m'a4i a£„ i:vA m'Z ce« W�� irnco i t a E o 6 3 i°e u Q L" W Zi @ Fm ui \/ s � z W � }). , .. \§-» ]/i {¥} \-) - !7! {({{ !|( §}{ | () -- )�� - 7-;E !;|% - f;!! �!" •�7 so !°§ � . k| } {2; | \/ s � z W � \ § � § § LU § § ! !k|| $ \7${ ! «! !!!¥ (� Mk ®\ kk\} E �m / !kmEi . — kf El }�®( -00 ,J2 Z;! m! f!! ) |! . H!;!! { { \ ! § /!;{! | f *k!$ !§f\#!» )!!!! ! 2§;|o k\\}\ k);|! a1 *| . .` • \ § � § § LU § § Sign, Business Directory -2 One sign is allowed per building in Districts t, 3 and 4, provided that the following standards are met. • The signboard shall be constructed of wood, acrylic, aluminum a metal and shall be architecturally compatible with the style, composition, materials, colors and details of the building No part of the sign shall encroach on the right-of-way and its location shall not Interfere with pedestrian or vehicular circulation Projects with multiple tenants in a single building shall coordinate project signage as part of a holistic design. Business directory signs within District 1 should Incorporate the Village brand Identity of Avienda. Prohiblted signs The following signs are prohibited: • Signs employing mercury vapor, low, pressure and high pressure sodium and metal halide lighting; plastic panel rear-Bghted signs. Signs on roofs, dormers, and balconies Billboards Back -lit awnings Interchangeable letter boards or panels Flashing signs Nil flnnlVmnisaW�`Vanl II _ n n,,.. Fa•.15iarv� Al n AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES ' nbavc: aualneaa Dlrecmre-a syn with nultlpktemnts aelowand Wgid: Naturnl some materials arc ,,,+fened for syn Mus ad all scales. Avienda Overall — ± k \ z 0 § LU § § � z W Q _ kk/ )({ } § k! ! ki| ��\ k}\ \ \ k :t2 -| 0 �f7 ti ; { je E - : ;!• _!! ! ;,| ! _ k $!f -`a `f\ ii! ! ! )§ § k!§ {!k) !\ !3 k} /{} \ tk �� \��§ § . �: ` �!)`` { _ k}klk` ! § Ei). ® p . " '''');&§■=!!iRR-E ' a\(k' ± k \ z 0 § LU § § � z W Q Large Tenant Retail Signage Calculations apply to tenants with more than 10,000 sf of leasable area Signage shall be Integrated Into the architectural features of the facade to which they are attached Maximum signage area Is calculated at 15% of wall area for each building Largs Ter W lmall Slgnag• Maximum area calculation may transfer to other storefronts, [eased by the same tenant to Increase tenant visibility to surrounding streets Wall -mounted signs shall not project more than 1 o"from the building. Cabinet signs are prohibited. Service/secondary signage maximum area Is 2 sf AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall — 18 Stormwater Management Overview Stormwater management will be handled with a mix of surface ponds, raingardens, permeable pavement, filtration, underground chambers, and a reuse lagatlon system. The mix of systems will provide an environmentally responsible, visually pleasing strategy to manage stormwater while providing focal amenities. Detailed strategies for managing Stormwater within Avlenda can be found In the Stormwater Management Plan. Ob)"Whies Stormwater shall be managed to the maximum extent practicable to meet the requirements of the watershed, city and other agencies. Integration of water and landscape, use of high quality materials and providing a safe environment supply the overlying objectives. Recommendations Stormwater management facilities will be for the most part Installed and maintained by the master developer. Individual development proJects should Implement additional management features, as feasible, depending on their specific situations. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall — 701 � E! ! §I| / !$ / k k ! . ! �§; { {} \}/} ! t00 k® (\! _ ) 0 ))!a'E' k{ !)!E ( k{ k{kk \�2 )Ik «e!=|z! (}!�!f!! |kf|#{!$ 1,4 �k\ !!f!z5 -_ � {�k\\72 { . / k k ! . ! { {} \}/} t00 k® _ 0 k{ ¥f ( k{ k{kk 1,4 �k\ ( /)k\{/\ $/' { {} \}/} ( k{ k{kk 1,4 N O J W Z 0 VI W f.. Z W f a O J W W D Z W s BlufAmaTrailhead • Create a naturalistic experience within Avlenda • Work with existing terrain and vegetation Add site amenities, wayfinding trees and ornamental plants at key nodes SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHARACTER MAINTENANCE PUNTING DENSITY PRIMARY USERS SITE PRIORITY Urtun High High Pedestrian ImmeEla e (soeenig) Impact • L. Ion,Term Natural Law (WONINy) Automobile ImPCt AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avlenda Overall — 22 PartTwo: Sub -district Guidelines Overview The Master Plan identifies five distinct subdlstricts within Avienda. Each of these sub -districts (outlined on the plan below) Is defined by specific site development patterns and perhaps a distinctive character or Image. The sub - districts complement one another as part of the overall plan. The subdistricts are shown the attached Sub -district Map (Figure 5). They Include. • Sub-Dlstdct I -Workplace- provides a location for uses with high concentrations of employees, such as medical/technology related office, and other corporate or Institutional uses Sub -District 2 -The Village - provides the broadest wrlety, highest density and greatest Intensity of development, encouraging both vertical and horizontal mixed use Sub -District 3 -Commercial - provides a location for larger scale retail and other auto -oriented commercial uses Sub -District 4-MuRI-Family- provides opportunities for high density senior or rental apartments Sub -District 5 - Low Density Residential - provides opportunRles for small lot homes Development plans must respond to the overall Avienda Design Guidelines descrlbed In Part One, but also the following detailed framework for each sub- district. To further clarify and Illustrate proposed features In the Master Plan, these sub -district guidelines are organized under the following categories: • Public Realm / Streetscape • Site Design Architectural In all cases, the sub -district framework must be applied In harmony with the overall Avienda framework and with other existing city, county, state codes, design criteria, plans and studies that support broader goals for regional growth and development Public Realm/Stres ucape The developer shall be responsible for construction of all streetscape Improvements along adjacent streets. These Improvements Include all hardscape and landscape improvements, such as trails, sidewalks, street trees, benches, bike racks, litter receptacles and plantings. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Plazas Except for Sub -District 5 -Low Density Residential, all properties with principal buildings should have some public plaza space. The public plate space should include benches, trash receptacles, lighting fixtures and other amenities to create a welcoming space for tenants, residents and guests. These plazas spaces should be visible from the main site access (front door) or well aligned with the project's public frontage. ._ ..._. __—. \ OFFICEDISTRICT DENS ,f •`� HOUSING (J/— DISTRI 4 VILLAGE RETAIL DISTRICT ' MULTRAMILY _ J 11 NO TRICT i.a RETAILRHOSPITAUTY DISTRICT ) ©Z � z LLJ Q Sub -District I - Office Public RealmlStreetscape The Office Subdistrict encourages a mix of large and small floor plate buildings, but Instead of commercial or entertainment, this area of Avlenda Is dominated by office uses. With opportunities for corporate or medical campus development comes the auto -related Infrastructure -easy access, bigger streets and large surface parking lots. Once again, this suggests that equal attention be paid to public realm and streetscape Improvements that not only accommodate vehicles, but also Invite bicycle and pedestrian traffic. Site Development Buildings in this sub -district should face adjacent streets, with both primary and secondary entries provided to animate these important facades. Architectural Character Buildings in the office district should have a ground floor level that Is visually distinct and proportionally larger than individual floors above it. Maximum heights for buildings In this district are limited to three stories. AV I E N DASub-District 25 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES _ _ _. _ _____. ��- Sub -District 2 -The Village Public Realm I Streetseape Public realm and stmetscape Improvements define the character of Avlenda and create a memorable signature for the Village sub -district. Great plazas and great streets, encourage Intensified levels of activity, support the proposed mix of uses, Invite community gathering and accommodate special events throughout the year. Provide gracious sidewalk width to support intensity of pedestrian traffic In the Village • Incorporate durable, high quality amenities including unit pavers, Integral colored concrete or soaring patterns, additional plantings, ornamental fencing and other features Trees and planters along the Village streets to create an Inviting space. Wide sidewalks and logical connections to the Avienda trail system. Outdoor dining is encouraged Placa space is strongly encouraged at key development nodes. A variety of plaza uses have been explored to support the needs of residents and guests to gather, play, relax and eat Architectural Character Buildings should be composed of a visually distlnct'base,-middle, and'top". Adopting a visually distinct base will Support the relationship of the building to the pedestrian experience. Adopting a visually distinct middle will create locations to provide signage as well as architectural massing and overall proportions that enhance the character of the development. Adopting a visually distinct top will create consistancy and will uniquely Identify where the building meets the sky. Heights In this zone are restricted to a maximum of two stories above grade. Village Characteristics CHARACTER MAINTENANCE Urban t Higb Natural Low PLANTING DENS" PRIMARY USERS SM PRIORITY Immedl.b, Hlyb Peaennan mPact (xreening) Long Term Low Impact Msibility) Aulomoblle AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES _ Sub -District 2 — 26 Signage Village Project Sign sreu: Large tenant signage st, 15 sf, 4'-0'wlde x 3'-8'talL (I) one sign per project Sign Large tenant signage s2, 8 sf, 4'-0'wide x 2'-W tab, (2) two signs per Project Sign Village Tenant Signage Criteria: Tenant signage calculations apply to tenants with less than 10,000 sf of leasable area. Maximum signage area Is calculated at 15%of storefront area for each elevation of the storefront. optional signage allowance on rear elevation. Signage to be no more than 50% of primary entrance. Length of the sign shall not be more than 75%, of the overall tenant storefront measured linearly In width. signage may be calculated for each storefront or elevation facing a designated pedestrian corridor. Maximum area calculation may transfer to other storefronts or building elevations, leased by the same tenant to Increase tenant visibility to surrounding streets. The body of the sign shall not exceed 30' In height. Enlarged Initials, capitals and extended typographical elements leg, such as the up and down strokes of'(j'and'h', etc), are acceptable up to a maximum of 36'in height or width. Stacked signage or logos must not exceed 48' In height and must fit other signage criteria. P'A'W'el Tenant Signage lorations (30ding Focal Point 3u _u lease arm building homage Example: 8torefroril dinronslo 3660 S'l. ry elevatl30 sj. total 38 e 0% allowable 5=ign et. on primary entrance Optional signage for Corner tenants are allowed to match primary entrance signage at two storefronts. Blade Sign(s) to be calculated as part of total allowable signage. Blade Signs to be a min. of 8' AFF, may not extend above the cornice line, and may have a max. signage area not to exceed 4 sf per face. Wall -mounted signs shall not project more than 10'from the building. Cabinet signs are prohibited. 'Storefront'refers to the first 12' above each tenant floor of lease area building frontage with public access. 'Elevatlon'refers to the first 12'above each tenant floor of lease area building frontage without public access. office tenant signage will be allowed on a building directory near the primary entrance and ability to use monument signage locations. Design Review Committee approval shall be based on sign design quality, attractiveness, scale appropriateness, and compatibility with the building to which attached. Service/secondary signage maximum area Is 2 sf. Outlots will be allowed (1) freestanding ground monument within their property that conforms to the overall development materials and aesthetic, with a maximum size of 5'-0-(H) x 10'-0' (W) with approval by the Design Review Committee. AV I E N DAsub-District 2 — 27 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES__. Y t VI I IL h W Z J W 0 7 Z VI W 0 f Z W F a 0 J W W Z w Gathering Space - LWel Relax Gathering space related to adjacent retail that encourages lingering, gathering, and connection.This setting Identified as LIVE/RELAX is a peaceful area with small seating groups and options for an overhead canopy, fire feature, kinetic art, calming water features and lush plantings. LIVEIRELAX is comfortable and shady on a hot day and a welcoming placy to cozy up to the fire in the cool season. AV I E N DASub-Distnct 2 — 29 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES W Jps A jl ;�Fli�l: NI W Z J'. C 7 V Ui N W F LAJ 01 a'. W W 01 Z W AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES BUILDING PLACEMENT align buildings with the pedestrian environment Encourage window shopping. REALM walkable streets. Create comfortable outdoor places, in a variety of scales, to meet, shop and relax. use a consistent high-quality palet of materials that Is consistent with Aviend" brand. Sub -District 2 — fi 16 z LL 2 ANIMATED STREET vibrant pedestrian experience along street, providing opportunities to relax and gather AV I 'NDA Sub -District 2 - DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES create new, attract1w design and landscape features AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -District 2 — 38 f AV I E N DASub-District 2 — 39 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES _ _. ,___ , Sub -District 3 - Retail and Hospitality Public Realm I Stneetscape While the Retail and Hospitality Sub -district encourages a mix of large and small floor plates, accommodating auto -oriented uses, this suggests even greater attention be paid to public realm and streetscape Improvements that not only accommodate vehicles, but also Invite bicycle and pedestrian traffic. Surface parking lots provide convenient access to storefronts, but present an additional challenge to the overall visual character and aesthetic appeal of this area. Playas adjacent to main entrances are encouraged. Architectural Character Massing and rhythm define the overall feel of an individual bullldng. Massing and rhythm In this district should Include breaks In the roof line and vertical transition lines that articulate sepeate tenants In the same building. Massing and rhythm should continue around corners and buildings should not appear to have a'rear'fscade. Heights In this zone are restricted to four stories above grade. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -District 3 — 40 WA W) d G z § x § § � z W � \� {722\3 {\\f !!°\k- {!{; __ ! _0 i2!! \\\ }\}�� f\E! - /)\ } ) \)${ ) E ■ -!`{!2 ` �\k« )\)� f ) |{{ !)i:f Illi ! y��y )MZ &!£!|! W) d G z § x § § � z W � Sub -District % - Low Density Residential Public ReolmlStmetscope A large preserve area and access to regional trails supply the informal green space for Avienda, and more specifically, provide the valuable park frontage and mix of amenities needed to support housing development within the Muhl - Family and Low Density Sub -districts Site Development The Low Density Sub-Districtemphasizes residential development To support the proposed housing, a well connected project will link residents to the Village (actively, center of Avlenda) and adjacent recreational amenities. Residential front doors will connect with public walks along each of these streets promoting the urban character of Avlenda. Special attention should be paid to welcome adjacent existing neighborhoods Into Avlenda. Within with subdistrict a minimum driveway length of 20 -feet is recommended to limit conflicts between vehicles parked in the driveway and street or sidewalk users AV I E N DA Sub-Distnd 5 — 43 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Larkin HO�fman wrroa Hsrs October 3, 2017 Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Larkin Hoffman 8300 Norman Center Drive Suite 1000 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55437-1060 GEMrswl: 952-835-3800 FAR' 952-896-3333 wra: www.larkinhoffrnm.com Re: Level 7 Development LLC - Wetland Alteration Permit Request for Extension of Time Limit under Minnesota Statutes § 15.99 Dear Ms. Aanenson: This letter is submitted on behalf of Level 7 Development LLC. Level 7 has applied for a Wetland Alteration Permit for its Avienda Project in the City of Chanhassen. Pursuant to the City of Chanhassen's request, Level 7 requests an extension of the commencement of the automatic approval period for responding to Level Ts application for a Wetland Alteration Permit so that, unless otherwise agreed by Level 7 and the City of Chanhassen, the time limit for a response established in Minnesota Statutes § 15.99 is extended until December 10, 2017. I am available at your convenience to discuss Level 7's request. L�LcMson,-sq., for Hoffman Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. Direct Dial: 952-896-3257 Email: plarsonno larkinhoffman.com cc: Kendra Lindahl, AICP Andi Moffatt, PWS 4810-6270-5489, v. 1 AVIENDADEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES L v 9 ,� AVIENDADEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Contents Overview— 5 Signage— 14 Introduction7o Design Guidelines Overview Application Objectives Implied Responsibility Definitions Standards Part One: Overall— 7 Overview Stormwater Management— 19 Context— 8 Overview Overview Objectives Recommendations Recommendations Objectives Public Spaces— 20 Street Hierarchy— 9 Overview Overview Recommendations Recommendations Objectives Streetscape— 10 Part Two: Sub -district Overview Guidelines— 23 Recommendations Overview Objectives Public Realm/Streetscape Street Lights Plazas Parking— 12 Sub -District I - Office — 25 Overview Public Realm/Streetscape Recommendations Site Development Objectives Architectural Character Minimum Standards Loading Areas Architecture — 13 Overview Version: 2017 Apr 13 AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -District 2 -The Village — 26 Public Realm / Streetscape Architectural Character Signage Streetscape Character Gathering Space - Live/Relax Gathering Space -Work/Play Sub -District 3 - Retail and Hospitality — 40 Public Realm / Streetscape Architectural Character Sub -District 4 - Multi -Family Residential— 42 Public Realm/Streetscape Site Development Architectural Guidelines Sub -District 5 - Low Density Residential— 43 Public Realm/Streetscape She Development AVIENDA Overview Avienda (Pronounced: Ah -vee -EN -da) is a district with "elegant vitality' fulfilling the city of Chanhassen's vision to become one of the region's most vibrant, prosperous communities. Located at the confluence of Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard, Avienda offers a desirable, diverse shopping and lifestyle destination with convenient access. As a gateway to the City of Chanhassen, development in Avienda should blend the best of retail, office, medical and hospitality. It should support high quality, attractive design that is compatible as a whole with forms and materials that are authentic to the region. Design Drivers Timeless architectural features and forms A color palette drawn from earth tones and natural elements A safe, balanced network of pedestrian, bicycle and automobile access • Inclusive opportunities to relax and gather Lush, resilient plantings with multi -season interest Responsible resource use Introduction To Design Guidelines This document is intended to help direct design solutions and define character for this project. It is also intended to provide concepts for future development that will establish and maintain the aesthetic character of Avienda. DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Purpose These guidelines set basic parameters, describe preferences and illustrate design intent. They serve as a framework within which creative design can and should occur. There is no one prescribed solution, but many options that can meet the basic requirements and intent of this document. Application The format and content of these guidelines are specifically tailored for use as a reference workbook that is organized into two parts. The first part outlines issues and recommendations that apply to the entire project area. The second section highlights specific guidelines that apply to each sub -district. Implied Responsibility All participants in the development of this project area must recognize the local and community impacts of this project and the various systems that play an important role. Each building must fit within the context of the entire plan. Individual projects must complement, not compete with, adjacent development in terms of public space, walk and trail connections, stormwater management solutions, street layout, parking strategies, land use mix and building design. Projects in this development will also need to comply with City of Chanhassen PUD standards. Introduction — 5 Part One: Overall Overview There are a number of standards that apply to the entire Avienda development including recommendations for stormwater management, parks, streets, land use, parking, transit and other development components. Many of these overall Avienda guidelines overlap, or are integrated with one another. For ease of discussion they are categorized according to the same list of'layers'that formed the basic structure for the Guidelines: Context - local, city, regional Street Hierarchy --access, circulation, arrangement Streetscape—preferred design, location Parking -- quantity, location, type Architecture - preferred uses, horizontal/vertical mixed use, built form, character of development Signage—design, location, quantity, type Stormwater Management-- surface water features, stormwater management Open Spaces - trails and plazas It is essential that proposed design solutions for development projects and other improvements within Avienda demonstrate an understanding of the interplay between these layers. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall — 7 Context Overview Avienda is a unique area within Chanhassen; but it is a part of, and connected with, a variety of local, city-wide and regional systems (See Figure 1). Each development project, whether a single building, one lot, or a series of blocks, must provide reasonable links to these systems as a primary design objective. Recommendations To ensure that Avienda takes full advantage of local and regional systems, development should: Provide safe, easily recognized connections to city, county and state trail corridors Make provisions for public amenities and encourage their use Tie into, and improve, the Chanhassen utility network Integrate with and complement the existing (and future) street framework Become an integral part of the city and county drainage/stormwater management plan Objectives Stormwater shall be managed to the maximum extent practicable to meet the requirements of the watershed, city and other agencies. Where Stormwater features are visible, they should support the aesthetic design of the development Bikeways and pedestrian routes in Avienda must be designed for safety and ease of access. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall — 8 Street Hierarchy Overview The Development Master Plan defines a strategy for the layout of public and private streets in Avienda. The size, type and configuration of this street hierarchy is based on a combination of projected traffic volume, level of service at intersections, proposed adjacent land use and desired aesthetic character. These guidelines promote a system that balances pedestrian and vehicular use. Recommendations The proposed street pattern reflects an opportunity for residents and visitors to park once and enjoy the shops and amenities on foot. Methods to achieve this include: Provide a street network that distributes pedestrian and vehicular traffic throughout Avienda (many choices or travel paths) Promote improvements that invite pedestrian and bicycle use including wide sidewalks, streetscape amenities and designated bicycle trails AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES STREET CENTERLINE I 10' V 22' 22' 20' I 6' 11r) 18'i18' 11' 10' I uniminimbul. 10, 9' 16' Varies 16' 9' 10 2 -LANE PARKWAY Avienda Overall — 9 ■ ■ ■ ■ Streetscape ■ Overview ■ Amenities within the public right-of-way - and private portions of the ■ pedestrian realm - play an important role in the aesthetics and placemaking of the Avienda streetscape: ■ Plazas and public gathering spaces ■ Street/sidewalk character and streetscape elements ■ Bicycle/pedestrian connections ■ Residential courts and other private green space ■ The goal is to foster a safe and welcoming public realm that will invite pedestrian activity, promote traffic calming and encourage community ■ gathering. Street trees, lighting and decorative fencing frame corridors and ■ outdoor rooms. Special pavements, street furniture, public art and layered plantings will enhance points of interest and transition. ■ ■ Recommendations Give pedestrian scale to otherwise vast open parking lots, streets and plazas by: Incorporating boulevard, median, and parking island trees to frame space and provide shade Installing street lighting that meets all safety standards and design criteria, while creating a signature character for this district Providing bike parking and pedestrian connections as part of each project within Avienda Placing benches, seating, wayfinding kiosks and litter receptacles with regularity along trail loops Objectives Creative design solutions for streetscape improvements should include: Streetscape improvements that provide traffic calming Inviting streetscapes that balance the needs of automobiles and pedestrians, and draw you into and through Avienda A marriage of building design and streetscape design that encourages active spaces near the streets Street Lights Decorative street lights are desired for Avienda and the developer will work with the City and Xcel Energy to finalize the luminaire and pole types. Lighting design Conceptual Roadway Lighting - BEGA brand 77836 (single pole top luminaires) and 77841 (double pole top luminaires) have been chosen for their quality and aesthetic. Conceptual Pedestrian Lighting - BEGA brand 77210 (pole top luminaires) have been chosen for their quality and aesthetic. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Conceptual Roadway Lighting Conceptual Pede,tra. Avienda Overall — 10 STREETSCAPE CHARACTERISTICS CHARACTER MAINTENANCE PLANTING DENSITY Urban High High Impact (screening) Long Term O Impact Low Narural _.. (visibility) I Birds eye of Bluff Creek Boulevard PRIMARY USERS SITE PRIORITY Pedestrian Immediate Impact Long Term Automobile Impact Street Trees .2amla Whi" 04 r Birch Red Oak White Oak Landscape enhancements at intersections AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall — Parking Overview Balancing the realities of auto -related necessities and the desired character of Avienda is a significant challenge. The goal is to provide adequate parking; both quantity and location, while promoting new strategies that support the overall needs of Avienda. Parking will be provided through a combination of on -street spaces, off-street surface lots and structured ramps to support the mix of uses at Avienda. Parking structures should contribute to the overall character and image of Avienda. Ramp design should include elements, colors and materials that reflect, or complement surrounding buildings. Liner stores/units or other street level uses should be integrated into ramp design. Recommendations Parking guidelines encourage the following: Provide combination of fencing and landscaping to minimize the prominence of parking areas from important views Explore options to integrate stormwater management requirements into parking area design Landscaped parking islands intended for tree plantings must include adequate soil volume for healthy tree growth. Generally, provide one to three cubic feet of soil volume per one square foot of tree canopy area Objectives The primary objective is to provide a balance of surface lots, on -street and structured parking, with ample quantities and close proximity to serve the mix e:_"->. Lush plantings with year round interest and low water use. of uses in Avienda. In addition to providing adequate space, quality design is crucial. The framework for Avienda encourages creativity, innovation, quality and attention to detail in the project development, including parking solutions. Minimum Standards Parking in Avienda is intended to be shared to the greatest extent practicable in all mixed-use areas. Parking shall be provided under any of the following arrangements: Shared parking arrangements between nearby uses are encouraged in all subdistricts Within Sub -District 2 parking on individual parcels serving individual uses may be provided if designated and approved as part of the master plan Loading Areas Loading areas and docks shall be placed on the building's least visible elevation Loading areas shall be screened from public streets and residential areas through landscaping and building design measures. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Comfortable pedestrian connections within parking lots Avienda Overall — 12 ■ Promote an animated street presence with a mix of street -level uses, ■ interesting building facades, doors and windows on the street where Class I: ■ Architecture Brick ■ elements that animate the pedestrian experience ■ Overview Natural stone ■ The architectural guidelines are intended to encourage an integration of by a raised parapet, by comparable and compatible exterior building ■ both traditional and contemporary design. Buildings should have a balanced materials, or painted to complement the building materials in order to ■ horizontal / vertical rhythm of windows, offsets, roof lines, materials, and diminish its impact. Incidental rooftop equipment deemed unnecessary ■ entrances. Buildings should be highlighted by massing variety that includes to be screened by the City shall be of color to match the roof or the sky, transition lines. Main entrances of buildings should be clearly identifiable whichever is more effective. ■ and timeless architectural materials, features, and forms should be integrated Equipment used for mechanical, processing, bulk storage tanks, or ■ into the design. Architectural designs should provide high-quality design, equipment used for suppressing noise, odors, and the like that protrudes ■ measured, to a great degree, by the pedestrian experience along the street and from a side of a building or is located on the ground adjacent to a ■ sidewalk and by an architectural expression that provides character without building shall be screened from public view as much as practical with being obtrusive, or artificial. The quality of the materials selected shall be materials matching the design of the building. Where miscellaneous ■ guided by the design drivers and classified in the Material Classification table. exterior equipment cannot be fully screened with matching building ■ Recommendations materials, landscaping may be used as additional screening. ■ Of all the layers that combine to form the project master plan, architecture will typically be the most prominent development component. Both visually Masonry stucco ■ and physically, architecture will play a major role in defining the overall design Exterior insulating finishing system (EIFS) ■ character and mix of uses. It is crucial that the design and location of buildings Wood ■ address these architectural guidelines with specific emphasis on the following: Material Classification* ■ Promote an animated street presence with a mix of street -level uses, interesting building facades, doors and windows on the street where Class I: ■ appropriate, careful design of lighting, awnings, signage and other Brick elements that animate the pedestrian experience ■ Natural stone Promote variety in building design, character and expression; not one ■ theme or building style, but a thoughtful integration of many design Glass ■ solutions Copper metal panels ■ Promote a variety of building types, including a range of height, Specialty concrete scale and proportion that supports an integrated mix of shopping ■ destinations, food venues, service businesses, commercial office options, Architecturally precast textured concrete panels and other mixed uses Class II: ■ Building location is as important as building style; special architectural Opaque panels ■ elements, character, transparency and a higher level of materials and detailing should be used to highlight corridors and crossroads Ornamental metal ■ throughout the project Architectural rockface cmu ■ Encourage the use of high-quality materials (as listed under the material classifications), suggesting a preference toward native materials, with Masonry stucco respect for local building techniques Exterior insulating finishing system (EIFS) ■ Minimize the impact of all mechanical equipment; as viewed from Wood ground levels at a variety of locations. All mechanical equipment located ■ on the roof or around the perimeter of a structure shall be screened *Other comparable or superior materials may be approved by Design Review Committee (DRC) ■ AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES stucco/eifs steel structure and angled louvers create filtered shade shade trellis -copper roof and facade panels copper metal panels -steel structure and "greenscreen" mesh infill creates living scrim walls of vines greenscreen natural stone -clear anodized aluminum storefront system with green tinted glass and spandrel glass storefront system Avienda Overall — 13 Signage Overview Signage within Avienda should provide a system for clear wayfinding for all modes of transportation and should ensure successful business operation while maintaining Avienda's brand. The Master Sign Plan identifies key sign locations. Developments shall apply to the City of Chanhassen for sign permitting. Objectives Signage should be used as a tool to help identify businesses and neighborhoods within Avienda and should have elements that are focused on its pedestrian nature as well as the signage needs for businesses. Signage and lighting which is integrated into the design of the building is encouraged. Definitions Sign, development identification means a permanent ground, low profile sign which identifies a specific residential, industrial, commercial or office development and which is located on the premises of the development which it identifies. Sign, business directory means a sign which identifies the names of specific businesses located in a shopping center, medical center or commercial, industrial or office development project which is located on the premises or entrance of the center or development so identified. Sign, informational means a sign containing descriptions of major points of interest, government institutions or other public services such as hospitals, sports facilities, etc. J 71 O OrE rsmoc[.:naa �7a ! Tm RETNL RETNL RS[ 6]CSa .yg19[ M CE Ssez.[.xsrses r - f I J 71 O OrE rsmoc[.:naa �7a ! Tm RETNL RETNL RS[ 6]CSa .yg19[ M CE Ssez.[.xsrses RETNL 3! WT 61[ i �Na f a� � 9 f = j t,,,, n� dim RETNL 3! WT 61[ i raw i' 1[Rb� J LEGEND OSign, Development Identification Q Sign, Business Directory -1 Sign, Business Directory -2 Oi Sign, informational A AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall — 14 �Na f a� � 9 f = raw i' 1[Rb� J LEGEND OSign, Development Identification Q Sign, Business Directory -1 Sign, Business Directory -2 Oi Sign, informational A AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall — 14 Standards Signs, Informational The pedestrian oriented nature of Avienda requires unique signage that will build on the design concepts for the development. These types of signs include street signs and wayfinding signs. Such signage shall be allowed on public spaces as needed to provide information and wayfinding. No advertising shall be allowed on Informational Signs except for community events. Sign, Development Identification The Avienda Development has a variety of gateways in varying scales. Three sizes of signs address those varying scales: Development Identification, Type 1 includes two signs on Powers Boulevard Development Identification, Type 2 includes one sign on the project retaining wall facing Highway 212 Development Identification, Type 3 includes one sign on Lyman Avenue, one sign at the intersection of Lyman and Powers and one sign at the western entry to the project from Bluff Creek Boulevard as shown on the Signage Plan These signs located around the periphery of the Avienda development are allowed as shown on the signage plan and shall have consistent materials and colors. A Business Directory -1 Sign is allowed as part of a holistic design coordinated with Development Identification, Types 1 and 2 or as a single freestanding sign on Powers Avenue. The sign shall coordinate with the materials of the Gateway Monuments. Tenant sign panel may be 8 sf, 6'-0"wide x 1'-4"tall, up to (3) three signs per monument. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Informational Signage I� TENANT TENANT Sign, Business Directory -2 One sign is allowed per building in Districts 1, 3 and 4, provided that the following standards are met: The signboard shall be constructed of wood, acrylic, aluminum or metal and shall be architecturally compatible with the style, composition, materials, colors and details of the building No part of the sign shall encroach on the right-of-way and its location shall not interfere with pedestrian or vehicular circulation Projects with multiple tenants in a single building shall coordinate project signage as part of a holistic design. Business directory signs within District 2 should incorporate the Village brand identity of Avienda. Prohibited signs The following signs are prohibited: Signs employing mercury vapor, low pressure and high pressure sodium and metal halide lighting; plastic panel rear -lighted signs. Signs on roofs, dormers, and balconies Billboards Back -lit awnings Interchangeable letter boards or panels Flashing signs Business Directory -1 Sign as part of Development Identification Sign, Type 2, view to northwest from Powers Boulevard Above: Business Directory -2 Sign with multiple tenants r Below and Right: Natural stone materials are preferred for sign bases of all scales. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall — 16 T T T� Business Directory -1 Sign as part of Development Identification Sign, Type 2, view to northwest from Powers Boulevard Above: Business Directory -2 Sign with multiple tenants r Below and Right: Natural stone materials are preferred for sign bases of all scales. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall — 16 Building Signs The following parameters apply to building signs. Local authority review, approval, and permitting is also required. All storefront signage and graphics are to be first reviewed and approved. All sign packages are to include: Locations Sizes Style of lettering Materials Types of illumination Installation details Logo design No roof mounted signs are permitted Store identification signs shall be limited to the Purchaser/Lessee's trade name. The Purchaser/Lessee must use a crest, shield, logo, or other establishment corporate insignia, the area of which shall be included within the allowable sign area Any sign, notice, or other self -illuminated signs, located in the interior of the premises and easily legible from the exterior, except those which are required ■ by law, code, ordinances, or regulations, will be allowed only if permitted by the City of Chanhassen All attachment devices, wiring, clips, transformers, lamps, tubes, bulbs, light ■ sources, manufacturers labels and plates, and other mechanisms for signage shall be concealed from public view Letters may be interior -illuminated with lamps wholly within the depth of the ■ letter ■ Only the following types of storefront signage will be permitted: ■ Individual dimensional work or metal back -lit ("halo effect") letters. . Internally -illuminated channel letters with opaque metal sides and translucent plastic faces. Building Focal Point Tenant signage vu -u wine lease area owning montage Example: Storefront dimensions = 12'-0" x 90'-0" = 1,080 s.f. x 15% = 162 s.f. total allowable signage on all sides No exposed crossover, raceways, ballast boxes, or transformers will be permitted for wall mounted signs. Raceways needed to support otherwise floating letters (not mounted to a wall) shall be painted to match adjacent building. All penetrations of the building structure required for sign installation shall be seating in a water tight condition and shall be patched to match adjacent finish The following types of signs and sign components and devises will not be permitted unless otherwise approved: Moving, rotating, or revolving signs Exterior changeable letters or signs Noisemaking signs Signs painted directly on the storefront sign band Signs employing flashing, flickering, changing or moving lights of any kind Inflatable signs Examples of some features that align with this intent are shown at right. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Over-all — Large Tenant Retail Signage Calculations apply to tenants with more than 10,000 sf of leasable area Signage shall be integrated into the architectural features of the fa4ade to which they are attached Maximum signage area is calculated at 15% of wall area for each building Maximum area calculation may transfer to other storefronts, leased by the same tenant to increase tenant visibility to surrounding streets Wall -mounted signs shall not project more than 10"from the building. Cabinet signs are prohibited. Service/secondary signage maximum area is 2 sf Table 1 Max. Percent of Wall Area Wall Area in Square Feet (sq. ft.) 15% 0-600 13% 601-1,200 11% 1,201-1,800 9& 1,801-2,400 7% 2,401-3,200 5% 3,201.4,500 3%, not to exceed 275 sq. ft. 4,500+ AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall — 18 Stormwater Management Overview Stormwater management will be handled with a mix of surface ponds, raingardens, permeable pavement, filtration, underground chambers, and a reuse irrigation system. The mix of systems will provide an environmentally responsible, visually pleasing strategy to manage stormwater while providing focal amenities. Detailed strategies for managing stormwater within Avienda can be found in the Stormwater Management Plan. Objectives Stormwater shall be managed to the maximum extent practicable to meet the requirements of the watershed, city and other agencies. Integration of water and landscape, use of high quality materials and providing a safe environment supply the overlying objectives. Recommendations Stormwater management facilities will be for the most part installed and maintained by the master developer. Individual development projects should implement additional management features, as feasible, depending on their specific situations. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall — 19 Public Spaces Overview Avienda healthy living brand seeks to incorporate a full menu of activity choices for visitors and residents. The plan links the existing neighborhood and trails through Avienda, creating interesting gathering nodes along the way. Of equal importance is the contribution from each development project to this network of green, adding a variety of private, semi -private, and perhaps some additional public space throughout Avienda. Private development will share the responsibility to provide inviting, innovative and useable green space as integral parts of individual parcel site design. Recommendations The Design Guidelines encourages the following: Private development should provide inviting gathering space as integral parts of each development project Create signature water features (ponds, pools, fountains, waterwalls) as major visual amenities throughout Avienda Small pedestrian nodes should highlight transition points within Avienda and provide respite along particularly long stretches of trail Objectives Based on the Development Master Plan for Avienda, a variety of public and private green space is proposed including: Each project within Sub -Districts 1, 2, 3, and 4 will provide intentional plazas or green areas as integral components of site development and building design A pedestrian node should include seating, a litter receptacle and shade with proportional understory plantings to anchor the area comfortably within the context of the trail or sidewalk. Pedestrian level lighting and wayfinding should be considered depending on the node location PEDESTRIAN NODE CHARACTERISTICS CHARACTER MAINTENANCE Urban High Natural 16 Low PLANTING DENSITY PRIMARY USERS SITE PRIORITY High Pedestrian Immediate (screening) I t Impact 46 Low Long Term (visibility) Automobile Impact AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall — 20 }R r n ♦p1 4J a. i -mum"WAID• ) 1' Bluff AreaTrailhead Create a naturalistic experience within Avienda Work with existing terrain and vegetation Add site amenities, wayfinding trees and ornamental plants at key nodes SITE CHARACTERISTICS CHARACTER MAINTENANCE Urban High Natural Low PLANTING DENSITY High ' (screening) Low (visibility) PRIMARY USERS SITE PRIORITY Pedestrian Immediate Impact Long Term Automobile Impact AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall — 22 Part Two: Sub -district Guidelines Public RealmlStreetscape Plazas Overview The Master Plan identifies five distinct subdistricts within Avienda. Each of these sub -districts (outlined on the plan below) is defined by specific site development patterns and perhaps a distinctive character or image.The sub - districts complement one another as part of the overall plan. The subdistricts are shown the attached Sub -district Map (Figure 5). They include: Sub -District t - Workplace - provides a location for uses with high concentrations of employees, such as medical/technology related office, and other corporate or institutional uses Sub -District 2 -The Village - provides the broadest variety, highest density and greatest intensity of development, encouraging both vertical and horizontal mixed use Sub -District 3 - Commercial - provides a location for larger scale retail and other auto -oriented commercial uses Sub -District 4 - Multi -Family - provides opportunities for high density senior or rental apartments Sub -District 5 - Low Density Residential - provides opportunities for small lot homes Development plans must respond to the overall Avienda Design Guidelines described in Part One, but also the following detailed framework for each sub- district. To further clarify and illustrate proposed features in the Master Plan, these sub -district guidelines are organized under the following categories: Public Realm / Streetscape Site Design Architectural In all cases, the sub -district framework must be applied in harmony with the overall Avienda framework and with other existing city, county, state codes, design criteria, plans and studies that support broader goals for regional growth and development. The developer shall be responsible for construction of all streetscape improvements along adjacent streets.These improvements include all hardscape and landscape improvements, such as trails, sidewalks, street trees, benches, bike racks, litter receptacles and plantings. -- 5 '' J --" MULTI -FAMILY - HOUS - V TRI Except for Sub -District 5 -Low Density Residential, all properties with principal buildings should have some public plaza space. The public plaza space should include benches, trash receptacles, lighting fixtures and other amenities to create a welcoming space for tenants, residents and guests. These plazas spaces should be visible from the main site access (front door) or well aligned with the project's public frontage. 1 OFFICE DISTRICT 2 VILLAGE RETAIL DISTRICT O 2 i AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -Districts — 23 --_ - BUILDING CHARACTER � + � Providing a creative mix of build in( -y+;' types, scales and expressions —d` �� •� � .�• lid-✓ � «y is AfJ�`-' y �►- �. ,/� Vila- SCREENING 0° screened mechanical units by raise parapets i.: ��y, .mss, ■ ; - — as ■ .f - _ ARCHITECTURAL EXPRESSION contemporary"timeless"design ., 3A that translates to all aspects of the development �two AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -Districts — 24 Sub -District I - Office Public RealmlStreetscape The Office Sub -district encourages a mix of large and small floor plate buildings, but instead of commercial or entertainment, this area of Avienda is dominated by office uses. With opportunities for corporate or medical campus development comes the auto -related infrastructure - easy access, bigger streets and large surface parking lots. Once again, this suggests that equal attention be paid to public realm and streetscape improvements that not only accommodate vehicles, but also invite bicycle and pedestrian traffic. Site Development Buildings in this sub -district should face adjacent streets, with both primary and secondary entries provided to animate these important fa4ades. Architectural Character Buildings in the office district should have a ground floor level that is visually distinct and proportionally larger than individual floors above it. Maximum heights for buildings in this district are limited to three stories. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -District I — 25 Sub -District 2 -The Village Public Realm I Streetscape Public realm and streetscape improvements define the character of Avienda and create a memorable signature for the Village sub -district. Great plazas and great streets, encourage intensified levels of activity, support the proposed mix of uses, invite community gathering and accommodate special events Village Characteristics throughout the year. CHARACTER MAINTENANCE Provide gracious sidewalk width to support intensity of pedestrian traffic in the Village ■ Incorporate durable, high quality amenities including unit pavers, integral colored concrete or scoring patterns, additional plantings, ornamental fencing and other features Trees and planters along the Village streets to create an inviting space. Wide sidewalks and logical connections to the Avienda trail system. Outdoor dining is encouraged Plaza space is strongly encouraged at key development nodes. A variety of plaza uses have been explored to support the needs of residents and guests to gather, play, relax and eat Architectural Character Buildings should be composed of a visually distinct "base", "middle" and "top" Adopting a visually distinct base will support the relationship of the building to the pedestrian experience. Adopting a visually distinct middle will create locations to provide signage as well as architectural massing and overall proportions that enhance the character of the development. Adopting a visually distinct top will create consistancy and will uniquely identify where the building meets the sky. Heights in this zone are restricted to a maximum of two stories above grade. Urban Natural High Low PLANTING DENSITY PRIMARY USERS High Pedestrian (screening) Low (visibility) Automobile SITE PRIORITY Immediate Impact Long Term Impact AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Signage Village Project Sign areas: Large tenant signage #1, 15 sf, 4'-0" wide x 3'-8"tall, (1) one sign per Project Sign Large tenant signage #2, 8 sf, 4'-0"wide x 2'-0"tall, (2) two signs per Project Sign Village Tenant Signage Criteria: Tenant signage calculations apply to tenants with less than 10,000 sf of leasable area. Maximum signage area is calculated at 15% of storefront area for each elevation of the storefront. Optional signage allowance on rear elevation. Signage to be no more than 50% of primary entrance. Length of the sign shall not be more than 75%, of the overall tenant storefront measured linearly in width. Signage may be calculated for each storefront or elevation facing a designated pedestrian corridor. Maximum area calculation may transfer to other storefronts or building elevations, leased by the same tenant to increase tenant visibility to surrounding streets. The body of the sign shall not exceed 30" in height. Enlarged initials, capitals and extended typographical elements (e.g., such as the up and down strokes of"g"and "h' etc.), are acceptable up to a maximum of 36" in height or width. Stacked signage or logos must not exceed 48" in height and must fit other signage criteria. Building Focal Point 1 30'-0" lease area building frontage Example: Storefront dimensions = 12'-0" x 30'-0" = 360 s.f. x 10% = 36 s.f. total allowable signage on primary entrance Optional signage for secondary elevation(s) = 36 s.f. x 50% = 13 s.f. Corner tenants are allowed to match primary entrance signage at two storefronts. Blade Sign(s) to be calculated as part of total allowable signage. Blade Signs to be a min. of 8' AFF, may not extend above the cornice line, and may have a max. signage area not to exceed 4 sf per face. Wall -mounted signs shall not project more than 10"from the building. Cabinet signs are prohibited. "Storefront" refers to the first 12' above each tenant floor of lease area building frontage with public access. "Elevation" refers to the first 12'above each tenant floor of lease area building frontage without public access. Office tenant signage will be allowed on a building directory near the primary entrance and ability to use monument signage locations. Design Review Committee approval shall be based on sign design quality, attractiveness, scale appropriateness, and compatibility with the building to which attached. Service/secondary signage maximum area is 2 sf. Outlots will be allowed (1) freestanding ground monument within their property that conforms to the overall development materials and aesthetic, with a maximum size of 5'-0" (H) x 10'-0" (W) with approval by the Design Review Committee. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -District 2 — 27 G y Y } { p 4q r _ 44, - 1 Gathering Space - Live/ Relax 00 Gathering space related to adjacent retail that encourages lingering, gathering, and connection. This setting identified as LIVE/RELAX is a peaceful area with small seating groups and options for an overhead canopy, fire feature, kinetic art, calming water features and lush plantings. LIVE/RELAX is comfortable and shady on a hot day and a welcoming placy to cozy up to the fire in the cool season. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -District 2 — 29 y D rI 11 Y a I lip- � p # r -I-.JI N2 `lw a V *a -0 wt._w 4r- a AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -District 2 — 31 - lI s rani r> 4 1� ,, I do i All t f -40AL AA y,�' IL I TEA AW - ' v ! 0 _ �� - _�� ';;IVUor SlowF 4 AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -District 2 — 32 • 4 . `! 1 wp�_ 4 .r •Yie F BUILDING PLACEMENT align buildings with the pedestriar environment. Encourage window shopping. PEDESTRIAN REALM place amenities with regularity along walkable streets. Create comfortable outdoor places, in a variety of scales, to meet, shop and relax. MATERIAL EXPRESSION use a consistent high-quality palette of materials that is consistent with Avienda's brand. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -District 2 — 34 D XF 4 HAIR `j VAR s Low 400 kip r r. y Y, AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -District 2 — 36 � -e Wst ALI 07 AL AP 47 b a ' � � .. +T... f�. 'rim �AWV..�'V'�•�JY^ BUILDING DESIGN VARIETY variation in character and expression LANDSCAPING create new, attractive design and landscape features MATERIALS high-quality natural materials AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -District 2 — 38 BUILDING INTEREST thoughtfully placed signed and utilization of awning and overhang features 1 I[:I-ITING i vi uyn Lilly eici nems w neap articuate and illuminate the site WALKING PATHS meandering walking path-. the site and adjacent trails AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -District 2 — 39 Sub -District 3 - Retail and Hospitality Public Realm / Streetscape While the Retail and Hospitality Sub -district encourages a mix of large and small floor plates, accommodating auto -oriented uses, this suggests even greater attention be paid to public realm and streetscape improvements that not only accommodate vehicles, but also invite bicycle and pedestrian traffic. Surface parking lots provide convenient access to storefronts, but present an additional challenge to the overall visual character and aesthetic appeal of this area. Plazas adjacent to main entrances are encouraged. Architectural Character Massing and rhythm define the overall feel of an individual builicing. Massing and rhythm in this district should include breaks in the roof line and vertical transition lines that articulate seperate tenants in the same building. Massing and rhythm should continue around corners and buildings should not appear to have a "rear"facade. Heights in this zone are restricted to four stories above grade. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -District 3 — 40 POO D t�- "I 'him Iii SIGNAGE MOWF A F 13 U, SIGNAGE'F�j T tit` all a Sub -District 4 - Multi -Family Residential Public Realm/Streetscape A large preserve area and access to regional trails supply the informal green space for Avienda, and more specifically, provide the valuable park frontage and mix of amenities needed to support housing development within the Multi - Family Sub -district. Site Development The Multi -Family Sub -district emphasizes residential development. To support the proposed housing, a well connected project will link residents to the Village (activity center of Avienda) and adjacent recreational amenities. Residential front doors will connect with public walks along each of these streets promoting the urban character of Avienda. Special attention should be paid to welcome adjacent existing neighborhoods into Avienda. Architectural Guidelines Buildings in the multi -family housing district should have uniformly proportional floors. Architectural expressions on the facade should relate to the units behind and should create a distinct seperation of the individual units in a generally uniform design style. Heights are restricted to six stories above grade. AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -District 4 — 42 Sub -District 5 - Low Density Residential Public Realm/Streetscape A large preserve area and access to regional trails supply the informal green space for Avienda, and more specifically, provide the valuable park frontage and mix of amenities needed to support housing development within the Multi - Family and Low Density Sub -districts. Site Development The Low Density Sub -District emphasizes residential development. To support the proposed housing, a well connected project will link residents to the Village (activity center of Avienda) and adjacent recreational amenities. Residential front doors will connect with public walks along each of these streets promoting the urban character of Avienda. Special attention should be paid to welcome adjacent existing neighborhoods into Avienda. Within with sub -district a minimum driveway length of 20 -feet is recommended to limit conflicts between vehicles parked in the driveway and street or sidewalk users AVI E N DA DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Sub -District 5 — 43 11 W. Landform® Profile Firm Landform is a multi -disciplinary consulting firm that offers a full range of integrated Description site design services, including civil engineeting, landscape architecture, planning, land surveying and development management. We offer a SensiblyGreen® approach to your site design and development challenges --from Site to Finish®. Our pfofessional resources include civil engineers, landscape architects, planners, development managers and land surveyors, based in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Our broad base of clients includes developers, architects, builders, municipalities, property owners and retailers, both locally and nationally. Structure Landform is organized into client -focused studios. Each studio offers a high degree of specialization, based on an in-depth understanding of the specific market they serve. Our current areas of specialization are: Planning,& Urban. Design Retail & Commercial Design Residential Design "We value innovative design, Each studio offers a fully integrated and interdisciplinary design process from Site to technical excellence, professional Finish®. Within the studios, project teams bring together professionals with specific integrity and strong work ethics. expertise and experience to meet their clients' needs. We make it our business to Our vision is to grow and understand our clients' business and the market in which they work. With that solid diversity, and help our clients do the same." understanding as the foundation, we shape our project design and delivery processes to anticipate those needs. Our proactive approach means we can be responsive to our Darren Lazan, RLA clients' needs while meeting demanding project schedules and budgets --efficiently and President competitively. History The founders of Landform had a vision of unparalleled commitment to customer service with high-quality design and technical documentation. This vision required a comprehensive approach to site design, so Landform expanded, adding land surveyors, landscape architects, planners and development managers. As the firm grew, Landform re -organized to serve clients more effectively. Studios 105 South Fifth Avenue were formed around market segments, based on client needs. - Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Today, each studio offers a fully integrated, interdisciplinary design process with Tel: 512-252-9070 professional staff that have the experience and understanding of their clients' specific requirements. With this approach, we are able to meet our goal of exceeding clients' www.landform.net expectations --project after project. Landform•. SensibyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional services, LLC. C FIRM QUALIFICATIONS Toole Design Group (MG) is pleased to present our qualifications for designing Bluff Creek Boulevard in the Avienda Development. This project will explore and ultimately identify preferred concepts prior to preparing construction documents for the extension of Bluff Creek Boulevard from its existing terminus to Powers Boulevard. TOG is the nation's leading planning, engineering and landscape architecture firm specializing in non -motorized transportation. We have a national reputation for our expertise in this area, and we offer a diverse, experienced team of professionals who are skilled at developing successful street and trail networks that support active transportation and healthy communities. The team assigned to the Avienda Development project is multidisciplinary: it includes engineers, planners and urban designers. Street and trail design is a key TOG focus—through the combined experience of our staff, we have planned and designed more than 1,000 miles of streets and trails throughout Minnesota and the U.S. We have experience designing roads that required variances or exceptions to State Aid and Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) design standards. Past projects our staff have worked on include the Jackson Street and Snelling Avenue projects in Saint Paul, numerous state highways in Minnesota and multilane roundabouts in Wisconsin and Massachusetts, among many others. Our design services include: Roadway and street design Streetscape design Greenway and trail design Low impact development Muhimodal/traffic analysis Traffic engineering Drainage design Pavement design Signal design Lighting design Erosin and sediment control design Construction phase services Design standards TOG has a thorough and complete knowledge of State Aid and MnDOT street and trail design in Minnesota, and we will bring that knowledge to the Avienda Development project. Having authored the nation's design guidelines for trails and bikeways, and having applied these design guidelines to trails and bikeways throughout the U.S., we are confident in our ability to advise LANDFORM and ultimately Level 7 Development on the best and most cost-efficient routing alternatives. Avienda Development – Bluff Creek Boulevard Design 0The deflectionisland QBirydiatayield ©blrl/saaducethe 0Paf"is 0aw'y Lists 0Birycletraffm QBisydistsare reduces notolist to pmeat,iana pCreating restricted al the wah ata signals tell muted behiM the tuming speeds and crossing the hike dbtaatgfer I.W.tion to queue Eos birydisb when bus stop, and yield mp,ovea visiMlity tem.pedpklYda aM Increase aislGlity to nuke lett it is sale to to bus passeryem between drivers, txiab tWi -1 between all users. tum.. proceed through accessity the stop, bicyclists, am Tpacaror,eopl. the intersaclion pedestrlaru. to wah before crossiry the street. TDG is well -versed in presentation graphics—we are proud of our reputation for producing,outstanding mdps, sketches and illustrations for public workshops and press events. Our graphic artists are skilled in developing sketches and drawings of potential trail and street design solutions, photographic imagery and conceptual design layout. Examples of our work are included throughout this proposal. TOG looks forward to the opportunity to work with LANDFORM and the Level 7 Development Team to assist in whatever ways are needed to coordinate with City staff and other key stakeholders. TOG has extensive Toole Design Group experience in working with diverse groups on street and trail projects, designing communication strategies and supportingkonducting effective public meetings. TOG staff are skilled at communicating withoutjargon, both verbally and in writing, focusing on.the important and relevant aspects of issues, and presenting them in ways that they can be understood by the lay person. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ r ■ ■ i i r ■ ■ r ■ ■ r r ■ ■ ■ ■ Avienda Public Improvements Work Plan DATE October 27, 2016 ._ PROJECT NAME Avienda PROJECT NUMBER SCD14001.LEV PROJECT LOCATION Chanhassen, MN BY Darren Lazan Team Member Member Item Landform I Toole I city Consultant Bluff Creek Boulevard Topographic Survey _ L.. Schematic Design L A Design Development Roadway L A A Utilities L A Landscape Architecture L A MSA ApprovalsNariance L A Construction Documents Roadway A L Utilities L A Landscape Architecture L A MSA Permitting L A Construction Staking L Construction Inspection Earthwork L A Roadway A L Utilities A L L A N D F O R M L Lead A Assist Complete Underway Remaining ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ r r / ■ r 1 1 1 ■ ■ ■ r ■ ■ ■ ■ Team Member Member Item Landform Toole city Consultant Item Landform Toole city Consultant Avienda Parkway Topographic Survey' i Schematic Design -., L'. A Design Development Roadway L A A Utilities L A Landscape Architecture L A Construction Documents Roadway A L Utilities L A Landscape Architecture L A Construction Staking L Construction Inspection Earthwork L A Roadway A L • Utilities A L. Pro�xYam v�anwm.aPwapw.ne.b aro.lU6..rvkam .L wpnwe wrvre mrh MlarGMn . LLE. L A N D F O R M L Lead A Assist ;.:..' Complete Underway Remaining z 0 Y 3 m f ■ Darren Lazan, RLA President ■ e� r ■ ■ Mr. Lazan has over 25 years of diverse experience in nearly all aspects of development, design and engineering, in both the public and private sectors. His comprehensive design and master ■ planning experience includes every sector of commercial development and corporate campus ■ management. His thorough understanding of the development business allows him to design and develop successful retail shopping centers and effectively manage their entitlement . processes. His development of a formalized site investigation process, streamlined graphic delivery system and unique approach to client service has set the standard for integrated design and development services. Education Architectural Design, Hennepin Technical College Registration Minnesota Experience McDonald's Restaurants, Multiple Midwest Locations The COR at Ramsey, Ramsey, Minnesota Independence, Sun Valley, Idaho Target Stores, Multiple Nationwide Locations Peninsula Town Center, Hampton, Virginia 16 West, Savannah, Georgia Current Lee Vista, Orlando, Florida The Foundry, South Strabane Township, Pennsylvania. The Marquis, Williamsburg, Virginia Promenade Shoppes at Lakemoor, Eagle, Idaho Church at South Mountain, Phoenix, Arizona Church of the Open Door, Maple Grove, Minnesota Waldorf School, Maplewood, Minnesota. Akin Riverside Historic Promenade, Anoka, Minnesota ADC Telecommunications World Headquarters, Eden Prairie, Minnesota Walgreens Stores, Multiple Nationwide Locations Andover Clocktower Commons, Andover, Minnesota Bridgewater Falls, Fairfield Township, Ohio Applebee's Restaurants, Multiple Nationwide Locations Champps Restaurants, Multiple Nationwide Locations Estrella Gateway, Goodyear, Arizona LA Fitness Centers, Multiple Arizona Locations Life Time Fitness and Aquatic Centers, Multiple Nationwide Locations Affiliations Minnesota Shopping Center Association (MSCA) Builders Association of the Twin Cities (BATC) Landform® is a registered service mark of Landform Professional Services, LLC. L A N D F 0 R M Kendra Lindahl, AICP Principal AW'c F I Ms. Lindahl leads the Planning & Urban Design Studio at Landform. Her experience with public and private sector clients spans 20 years. In that time, she has formed a solid sense of big -picture concepts and the details necessary for turning concepts into successful projects. She has also mastered creative, effective management skills in the increasingly complex approval process arena. Ms. Lindahl possesses a complete understanding of the municipal review and permitting process, allowing her to be a valuable addition to your development team. Her strengths include advanced writing skills, project management and effective presentation skills at public meetings and hearings. Education Master of Arts in Public Administration, Hamline University Bachelor of Arts, University of Minnesota -Morris Registration American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) . Experience Corcoran Design Guidelines, Corcoran, Minnesota New Richmond Ordinance Update, New Richmond, Wisconsin ■ Webber Park Master Plan/Public Involvement, Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board, Minnesota Village Commons, Savage, Minnesota , Inspiration, Bayport, Minnesota Radisson BLU at Mall of America, Bloomington, Minnesota The COR at Ramsey AUAR Update, Ramsey, Minnesota ■ The COR at Ramsey, Ramsey, Minnesota Hugo Comprehensive Plan Update, Hugo, Minnesota ■ Hanifl Fields Athletic Park Shelter, Hugo, Minnesota McDonald's Restaurants, Multiple Midwest Locations ■ Independence, Sun Valley, Idaho Highway 7 Corridor Study, Hutchinson, Minnesota Novus Master Plan -Trinity School, Eagan, Minnesota Village of Hardwood Creek, Lino Lakes, Minnesota Dunlop Park, Oak Grove, Minnesota ■ Big Lake Downtown Framework Plan, Big Lake, Minnesota Hugo Downtown Redevelopment Plan and Design Guidelines, Hugo, Minnesota ■ StoneBay, Orono, Minnesota Andover Clocktower Commons, Andover, Minnesota Affiliations American Planning Association (APA) . Minnesota Chapter of American Planning Association (MnAPA) Sensible Land Use Coalition (SLUC), Past President . Economic Development Association of Minnesota (EDAM) ■ Landform® is a registered service mark of ■ Landform Professional Services, LLC. L A N D F 0 R M ■ ' Steven E. Sabraski, PE Principal ■ ■ Mr. Sabraski is a Studio Lead for the Retail and Commercial Design Studio. His dedication to project success and attention to detail is unmatched. His expertise in grading design, ■ stormwater modeling and drafting provides the essential tools necessary for successful project ■ development. His experience with large commercial projects has given him broad exposure to the complexities related to the site development process, giving him a clear understanding of ■ what it takes to bring a project from Site to Finish®. ■ Education Bachelor of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota -Twin Cities ■ Registration/ Minnesota, Oklahoma, Missouri Certification Erosion and Sediment Control Specialist/Design of SWPPP Certification, ■ University of Minnesota -Twin Cities Experience Costco, Multiple Minnesota Locations 2700 University Apartments, St. Paul, Minnesota Minneapolis Fiat, St. Louis Park, Minnesota Luther Infiniti, Bloomington, Minnesota The Heights at Linden Square, Gladstone, Missouri Brookdale Toyota / Honda, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota Minneapolis Public Schools Headquarters, Minneapolis, Minnesota Radisson BLU at Mall of America, Bloomington, Minnesota Target Corporation, Multiple Nationwide Locations The Residence at The COR, Ramsey, Minnesota The COR at Ramsey, Ramsey, Minnesota - The Foundry, South Strabane Township, Pennsylvania Bridgewater Falls, Fairfield, Ohio Parkway Village, Goodyear, Arizona Church of South Mountain, Phoenix, Arizona Applebee's International, Multiple Minnesota Locations Chipotle, Multiple Nationwide Locations McDonald's Restaurants, Multiple Midwest Locations Wendy's, Multiple Minnesota Locations Suite Living, Multiple Minnesota Locations Brockdale Chevrolet / BG, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota Affiliations Minnesota Shopping Center Association (MSCA) Site to Finish' is a registered service mark of landform Professional Services, LLC. L A N D F 0 R 11 Tom Meyer, PE Project Lead Mr. Meyer is a Project Lead for the Retail and Commercial Design Studio with 19 years experience in civil and municipal engineering. His expertise in stormwater management allows him to apply a SensiblyGreen® approach to any project. His experience in grading and project management throughout the permitting and review process provides the essential tools necessary for successful project development. Education Bachelor of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota -Twin Cities Registration Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota Experience McDonald's Restaurants, Multiple Midwest Locations Stockyards, Kansas City, Missouri Costco Wholesale Warehouse, Multiple Minnesota Locations Luther White Bear Acura Subaru, Waite Park, Minnesota Miniapple Montessori School, Oakdale, Minnesota* Walgreens, Little Falls, Minnesota* Walgreens, Waite Park, Minnesota* Willow Apartments 8-Plex, Little Falls, Minnesota* Cherokee Restaurant Addition, Eagan, Minnesota* _ Shamrock Restaurant Off -Site Parking, St. Paul, Minnesota* 855 Rice St. Office Building Parking Lot Reconstruction, St. Paul, Minnesota* Upper Landing Urban Development Flood Response Plan, St. Paul, Minnesota* Metro Transit Stormwater Inventory Sturdy, Twin Cities Area, Minnesota* Site to Finish° and SensiblyCreen® are registered service marks of Landrorm Professional services, LLC. 'Experience gained at prior association L A N D F 0 R M Danyelle Pierquet, RLA Project Lead Ms. Pierquet is a registered landscape architect with experience that spans a broad range of project types including site design, master planning, transit -oriented development studies, comprehensive and redevelopment planning, process facilitation and neighborhood corridor revitalization. A common thread in all of her work is an emphasis on the creation of meaningful places, which serve communities well today and are designed to evolve beautifully in the future. Education Master of Landscape Architecture, University of Minnesota -Twin Cities Bachelor of Environmental Design, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities Registration Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Wisconsin Experience Park Nicollet Pollinator Policy Development, Twin Cities Metro, Minnesota Corcoran Design Guidelines, Corcoran, Minnesota Great River Landing, Minneapolis, Minnesota New Richmond Consulting Services, New Richmond, Wisconsin Northwest Area Access & Economic Development Study, New Richmond, Wisconsin Waite Park & Harrison Park Pool Renovations, Minneapolis, Minnesota ParkNicollet Methodist Hospital Landscape Architecture Services, St. Louis Park, Minnesota Town Center Master Plan, Shoreview, Minnesota Target Field Station, Minneapolis, Minnesota* MARQ2 Transitway Streetscape, Minneapolis, Minnesota* 1-35W Transit Access, Minneapolis, Minnesota* Bass Lake Road Streetscape, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota* Eagan Public Safety Center, Eagan, Minnesota* Ravine Parkway, Cottage Grove, Minnesota* Woodhill and Southdale Street Reconstruction, Edina, Minnesota* Green River High School Aquatic Center, Green River, Wyoming* Hastings Way Corridor Streetscape Design, Eau Claire, Wisconsin* Harrah's Cherokee Casino and Hotel, Cherokee, North Carolina* Richfield Maintenance Facility, Richfield, Minnesota* Park Siding Park, Minneapolis, Minnesota* Affiliations Sensible Land Use Coalition (SLUC) Urban Land Institute (UU) American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA) American Institute of Architects, Allied Professional Landform® u a registered service mark of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Individual experience gained at prior association* L A N 0 F 0 R M RESUMES Toole Design Group (TDG) has selected a group of highly experienced engineers, planners and urban designers for the Bluff Creek Boulevard project. The resumes of staff who will be involved with the project are listed on the following pages. I Toole Design Group ■ ■ ■ ■ KC Atkins, P.E. ■ Project Manager/Engineer ■ KC Atkins is a professional engineer with, nearly a decade of experience in transportation engineering and project management. Her experience in preliminary and final design includes roundabouts, bicycle/pedestrian ■ accommodations, urban/rural roadways, interchanges, local roads and context -sensitive design solutions, including designs that require MSA variances. KC also has experience in traffic engineering, performing traffic ■ analysis and delay calculations, as well as traffic safety, performing crash analysis, safety plans and road safety audits. Her wide range of knowledge allows her to incorporate multiple elements of engineering into her work ■ to provide safe multimodal infrastructure. ■ Select Experience Professional Highlights • Capital City Bikeway and Jackson Street Reconstruction, Saint Paul, MN Toole Design Group: ■ As deputy project manager, KC is assisting with day-to-day project 2014 -Present ■ administration and coordination. KC has helped guide'planning of a CH2M HILL: 2007-2014 Downtown Saint Paul bicycle networkthat will connect to regional ■ and state trail systems on the edge of downtown. KC's work includes Education/Certifications extensive public and stakeholder engagement, recommending Bachelor of Science, Civil ■ protected bikeway route alignments, developing design alternatives, Engineering, Institute of concept design of recommended six different bicycle routes within Technology, University of ■ Downtown including bridge over and underpasses and incorporating Minnesota:2007 transit facilities, and preliminary through final design and construction Professional Engineer: MN, WI ■ documents for the full reconstruction of Jackson Street, which including ■ successfully obtaining a MSA variance. • Improving the Arborway, Boston, MA ■ KC is the lead design engineer for developing 25% preliminary plans that will be carried through to final design plans and construction documents. ■ The design includes construction of three modern multilane roundabouts to replace two existing high speed traffic circles, separated bike lanes, ■ pedestrian trails and roadway reconstruction. The project closes a major ■ gap for bicyclists in Olmstead's Emerald Necklace park system and improves traffic operations through the vicinity that connects a complex ■ network of local street and vehicle -oriented parkways. • US 41, Oshkosh/Neenah, WI ■ As lead design engineer, KC designed preliminary and final plans for 12.5 miles of US 41 in Oshkosh and Neenah, WI. The design included 10 ■ multi -lane spiral roundabouts and bicycle/pedestrian facilities under multiple construction contracts. KC developed shared use paths adjacent ■ to roundabouts and adjacent to the freeway across Lake Butte des ■ Morts providing connections to existing trails across the lake. She also coordinated with landscape architects and Native American designers to ■ incorporate historic images and lessons to provide informative kiosks for trail users. KC also led task including the geometric layout, Design Study ■ Report, 401/404 Permit application, utility relocation review, structure survey reports, design exceptions and special provisions. Avienda Development — Bluff Creek Boulevard Design ■ 9 ■ MnDOT County Road Safety Plans ■ KC was the analyst, plan development and workshop facilitator for these ■ MnDOT plans. KC developed strategic highway safety plans by identifying ■ IH 94 Pavement Replacement, Eau Claire, WI ■ KC served as deputy project manager for the project on IH 94 from WIS ■ 37 to US 53. KC developed preliminary and final plans, special provisions, ■ construction estimates, Environmental Report and the Traffic Management ■ Plan. Design included intersection redesign along WIS 37 undemeath ■ the interstate and preliminary bicycle provisions that could be replicated ■ throughout the corridor as regional demand increases. ■ US 45, Winnebago County,Wl ■ KC served as lead design engineerfor preliminary and final design of ■ frontage roads and three new overpasses to convert the segment from ■ an expressway to a freeway with full access control. She developed ■ the wetland permit application, designed erosion control, staging and ■ pavement marking and provided utility coordination. ■ • US 10/WIS 441, Winnebago County, Wl ■ KC served as design engineer for a roundabout feasib'iLitystudy of11 multi- lane spiral roundabouts at four interchange ramp terminals and adjacent ■ intersections along US 10/WIS441. She performed traffic analysis, roundabout layout, including lane continuity, lane balancing, functional roundabout and ■ roadway geometric design and marking, and design recommendation and ■ estimates. These roundabouts required multiple lanes, and in one case, one roundabout was nearing a four -lane requirement. After review, only some of ■ the roundabout locations were recommended for design and construction due to project constraints. ■ Implications of Modifying State Aid Standards: Urban Construction or Reconstruction to Accommodate Various Roadway Users As project engineer, KC provided assistance and analysis of Complete Streets constructed in Minnesota. She provided coordination among the ■ different agencies to gather data on existing Complete Streets and assisted ■ with analysis of safety implications given the varying roadway sections to ultimately provideguidance to policy makers regarding the State Aid ■ Design Standards and whether or not modifications could be made in the context of Complete Streets. ■ MnDOT County Road Safety Plans KC was the analyst, plan development and workshop facilitator for these ■ MnDOT plans. KC developed strategic highway safety plans by identifying crash characteristics and prioritizing safety strategies for low-cost safety ■ projects. Shegathered and analyzed crash data and roadway characteristics, ranked segments, intersections and curves, prepared workshop materials and discussed potential strategies for safety improvements with the DOT, ■ Cou nty and local representatives. A final plan was developed with suggested strategies specific to each county. ■ Minnesota Vikings Training Facility AUAR KC was a project engineer providing quality assurance and quality ■ control (QA/Qq fbr crash analysis at intersections surrounding the ■ future Minnesota Vikings Training Facility to be located in Eagan, MN. The crash information was used. in the AUAR, documenting the impacts ■ of the new facility on the surrounding street system. ■ Toole Design Group ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ = I Chris Bower, P.E. Project Engineer ■ ■ Chris Bower has eight years of experience in transportation engineering, most of which has been spent working for MnDOT's Mankato and Metro District offices beforejoining TDG. He has a broad background in project ■ management, highway design, pavement design, traffic engineering, environmental documentation and construction oversight. During his time with MnDOT, he managed a variety of projects, which included urban reconstruction, bridge replacement, sidewalk and trail improvements, and pavement preservation. Most of Chris's projects required design exceptions from MnDOT. With his multidisciplinary background and project management ■ experience, Chris can work with a wide range of project stakeholders to reach a collaborative project outcome. ■ Select Experience Professional Highlights ■ Improving the Arborway, Boston, MA Toole Design Group: Chris is currently working on the 25% design forthe reconstruction of 2016-Present ■ the Arborway, a key automotive and bicycle corridor through Boston's Minnesota Department of historic Emerald Necklace park system. The project design includes Transportation: 2008-2016 separated bikeways and replaces two high-volume traffic circles with Braun Intertec Corporation: modern roundabouts. 2006-2007 ■ 1-394 Xenia Avenue Exit Plans and Spdcifications, St. Louis Park, MN Chris developed plans and specifications for exit ramp modifications at Education/Certifications ■ 1-394 at Xenia Avenue. This project included reconstructing a portion of Bachelor of Science, Civil ■ the exit ramp to improve traffic operations. Chris developed the project Engineering, Minnesota plans in Microstation and Geopak and in accordance with MnDOT State University: 2010 ■ standards and design guidelines. Professional Engineer: MN • 1-90 Alternate Bid Resurfacing, Luverne, MN ACI Field Technician Grade I Chris was the project manager and design manager for a nine-mile MnDOT Concrete Field alternate bid resurfacing project on 1-90. Due to a late change in project Technician Level I (Tech ■ scope, Chris had to manage the development of a full set of both ID #13661) MnDOT ' concrete and bituminous overlay plans in two months. Without time to Aggregate Production, obtain detailed survey information, Chris worked with MnDOT Central MnDOT Grading and Base I ' Office Staff to develop a streamlined plan set, piloting the use of new unit and lump sum-based pay items. He also piloted the use of color ' plan sheets, using aerial photography and LiDAR information in lieu of surveyed topography. • Highway 19 Henderson Bridge Replacement, Henderson, MN Chris developed the original geometric layout and was responsible for ■ managing this bridge replacement project over the Union Pacific Railroad. This project was challenging due to the railroad clearance requirements, sensitive environmental resources and poor geotechnical conditions. ■ Through the use of context-sensitive design and the extensive use of reinforced soil slopes, Chris developed an alternative that reduced project construction time by nine months, reduced the cost by about $500K and eliminated permanent wetland and wildlife refuge impacts. To facilitate ■ the context-sensitive design, Chris prepared design exceptions for horizontal curvature, shoulder width and intersection sight distance. ■ ■ Avienda Development - Bluff Creek Boulevard Design ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Highway 71 Jacksop Roadway and Bridge Reconstruction, Jackson, MN Chris developed the geometric layout and was responsible for managing this reconstruction project in downtown Jackson, MN. The ■ project included the replacement of the bridge over the Des Moines River, and about a mile of roadway and trail construction. Chris worked ■ with local stakeholders during a planned bridge replacement to add a shared use path and incorporate Complete Streets treatments, and ensure that the design met MnDOT state -aid standards. Through the use of context -sensitive design, he was able to make use of the existing ■ roadway section to add a trail without the need for additional right- of-way. He also managed utility relocation and development of traffic management plans for the project. ■ Materials Design Recommendations While working for MngOT, Chris reviewed soils and pavement ■ information and prepared materials design recommendations for a variety of projects in both the Metro and Mankato District Offices. ■ Among other projects, Chris developed the pavement designs and - materials design recommendations for the Highway 169 reconstruction in downtown Blue Earth and the Highway 60 four -lane expansion ■ between Butterfield and St. James. Both projects included concrete and ' bituminous options for alternate bidding. ■ 1-90 Pavement Resurfacing and Bridge Repairs, Minnesota While working for MnDOT, Chris managed multiple different pavement ■ resurfacing and bridge rehabilitation projects on 1-90 in Martin, Jackson, Nobles and Rock counties as,part of a multiyear infrastructure preservation ■ effort. Chris worked closely with local communities to minimize disruptions associated with the work. These projects included multiple formal design exceptions for verticeI clearance and shoulder width and informal design ■ exceptions for clear zone and roadside hardware. 1-494 Resurfacing Plans, Bloomington, MN . Chris was part of the project team that worked on the plans for resurfacing 1-494 through Bloomington. He developed the project i construction plans and worked on the project typical sections. He also developed plans and cross sections for a short westbound auxiliary lane between Portland and Nicollet Avenues. • Highway 30 Mill and Overlay,, Darfur, MN While working for MnDOT, Chris manage -d this 10 -mile mill and overlay ■ on a low-volume rural highway with roadside hazards within the clear zone. This project was challenging because the addition of guardrail to ■ protect the hazards would create snow drifts in the winter. Using the Interactive Highway Safety Design Model, Chris'developed a data -driven safety analysis to support the decision to leave the hazards unprotected in order to prevent a higher probability of fatal and serious injury crashes from blowing snow and ice. ■ . Toole Design Group ■ ■ ■ °� Hannah Pritchard, P.E., PTOE ♦ Traffic Engineer ■ ■ Hannah Pritchard is an engineer with a background in transportation planning and traffic engineering. Hannah has performed key engineering work on various corridor studies, walkabil'ity audits, road diets, downtown circulation ■ plans and analysis, and traffic impact studies. She is highly capable of translating between planners and engineers and developing plans that meet a communitys vision while remaining feasible from an engineering standpoint. She is ■ an avid bicyclist with a passion for incorporating non-motorized transportation into Complete Streets designs. She is highly experienced in the use of Synchro and HCS, as well as other traffic analysis and simulation packages. Select Experience Professional Highlights ■ Vikings Training Facility AUAR, Eagan, MN Toole Design Group: ■ Hannah was project managerand lead traffic engineer for the AUARfor 2013-Present a mixed use development in Eagan, MN, which includes the proposed Parsons Brinkerhoff: ■ headquarters and training facilityforthe Minnesota Vikings. Hannah worked 2006-2013- 006-2013with withtraffic engineers from the prime consultant to develop Synchro models ■ and perform a traffic impact study for 16 intersections surroundingthe Education/Certifications proposed development site. The analysis included multiple development Master of Science, Civil ■ scenarios and phases. For the maximum build-out scenario, Hannah was Engineering, Michigan State ■ responsible for developing innovative intersection designs as part of University: 2009 the traffic mitigation strategy. Hannah's role also included drafting the Bachelor of Science, Civil ■ transportation section of the AUAR document Engineering, Michigan State • Transit District Development Plan, College Park, MD University: 2004 ■ Hannah served as a traffic engineer for the College Park/Riverdale Transit Professional Engineer. Ml District Development Plan. Her work included performing a crash and safety (#6201057583), MN (#51962) ■ analysis for the study area. She was also tasked with quality control for traffic Professional Traffic analysis performed for existing,background, and project conditions. This Operations Engineer: 2015 ■ includes review of volume diagrams, Synchro models, and the final report. . Detroit Medical Center Royal Oak Traffic Impact Study, Royal Oak, MI Appointments/Affiliations The Detroit Medical Center proposed a new 97,000-square foot outpatient Institute of Transportation ■ facility in Royal Oak, MI. The facility was tobelocated atthe corner of Engineers (ITE) Woodward Avenue and 1-696, one of the Detroit metro region's busiest Women's Transportation intersections. Hannah served as the project manager responsible for • Seminar (WTS) determining the traffic impact the project will have on the exis)ing and Streets.MN Board Treasurer ■ future roadway system. Hannah worked with project stakeholders, including the Michigan Department of Transportation, to recommend Technical Proficiencies ■ roadway system improvements if there were any negative traffic impacts. Synchro 5.0—Synchro 8.0 ■ Argonaut Building Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study, Detroit, MI SimTraffic The Argonaut Building, formally used as a laboratory building by General HCS ■ Motors, was vacant. The build' ng would consist of the following land uses: SPSS school, office, residential housing and a small amount of retail space. A ■ parking structure was also proposed for a parcel across the street, as well as a surface lot for a separate parcel. Hannah was a traffic engineer responsible ■ for determining the traffic impact the project will have on the existing and ■ future roadway system, and to recommend improvements. ■ Avienda Development — Bluff Creek Boulevard Design ■ ■ ■ ■ Ciara Schlichting, AICP ■ Senior Planner ■ Clara Schlichting, AICP, is the Director ofTDG's Minneapolis, MN office where she leads a multidisciplinary team of planners, engineers and urban designers that work in the Midwest and across the county. Clara has nearly 20 ■ years of experience managing complex transportation, land use, and parks and trails projects, as well as leading community engagement programs, environmental reviews, comprehensive plans and zoning administration. ■ Clara has worked on multimodal projects ranging from planning routes in the United States Bicycle Route System and statewide bicycle and pedestrian plans to community -scale bicycle and pedestrian master plans and ■ revitalizing streets for all users. Clara brings her extensive background in land use and environmental planning ■ to her multimodal transportation projects to deliver projects that balance multimodal transportafion needs with community, land use, environmental, and infrastructure needs. Her projects have won local, state and national ■ awards from organizations such as the American Planning Association and the National Association of Counties. ■ Select Experience Professional Highlights • Capital City Bikeway/Jackson Street Reonstruction, Saint Paul, MN Toole Design Group: ■ Clara is project manager and is leading a multidisciplinary team of 2013 -Present planners, landscape architects, engineers, historians and artists to help Stantec (Formerly ■ transform Downtown Saint Paul into a destination suitable for 8 -80 -year- Bonestroo): 2006-2011 ■ olds. She is responsible for delivering all project tasks on time and within DSU: 2001-2006 the budget, including identifying the bicycle system routes, branding and Metropolitan Council: 1999- ■ wayfinding, protected bikeway style guide and final plan sets. 2001 • Rochester 2"d Street Southwest Construction, Rochester, MN ■ Clara is the senior planner assisting the City design 2" Street Southwest for Education/Certifications reconstruction. 2^ Street Southwest is the primary gateway from Highway Master of Science, Natural ■ 52 and a major transit link into the heart of Downtown Rochester and the Resource Science and world-renowned Mayo Clinic. Ciara is leading the community engagement Management, University of ■ process, which includes walkability reviews, focus groups, one-on-one Minnesota: 2000 ■ interviews with business owners and community workshops intended to Bachelor of Science, Natural reach broad and diverse stakeholders during the design process. Resources and Environmental ■ Vikings Training Facility AUAR, Eagan, MN Studies, University of Clara was the environmental review coordinator for the Alternative Urban Minnesota: 1997 ■ Areawide Review (AUAR) for a mixed use development, which includes the Certified Planner: American new headquarters and training facility for the Minnesota Vikings as well as Institute of Certified Planners hotel, retail, office and mulifamily residential uses. Clara was responsible for working with a multidiciplinary team ofplanners, engineers and scientists Appointments/Affiliations ■ to prepare the comprehensive environmental review of the 200 -acre site. Minneapolis Bicycle Advisory ■ 1-35E Corridor AUAR, Lino Lakes, MN Committee — Appointed by With her former employer, Clara was the project manger for this 4,600 Council Member Kevin Reich: ■ environmental review project that balanced transportation with land 2012 -Present use and environmental conservation strategies. A key strategy of the ■ AUAR Mitigation Plan for the 1-35E Corridor Area in the City of Lino Lakes was creating a Conservation Design Framework (CDF) to guide future ■ development. Clara helped facilitate a series of workshops with AUAR ■ reviewing agencies and a citizen advisory panel. ■ Toole Design Group ■ ■ ■ Cindy Zerger, AICP, ASLA ■ Urban Designer ■ Cindy Zerger is an urban designer at TDG with experience ranging from small design projects, to large statewide and national initiatives focused on multimodal transportation planning and design. Trained in both landscape ■ architecture and planning, she is adept at working toward successful project solutions from both the design and policy perspectives. Cindy's design experience is focused on streetscape design, trail design, bicycle ■ and pedestrian system connectivity, and site design. Cindy is known for her keen eye for design details yet a sensitivity to the importance of approaching projects from a comprehensive vantage point. Cindy Zerger co - leads the firm's Urban Design Group and is passionate about making paths that are as memorable as places. ■ Select Experience Professional Highlights ■ Capital City Bikeway/Jackson Street Reconstruction, Saint Paul, MN Toole Design Group: r As the lead landscape and urban designer on this project,Cindydeveloped 2014 -Present ■ the overall trail concept, approach to stormwater management, landscape Humphrey School of Public buffers, planting palette, integration of art, placement of site furnishings, Affairs, Research Fellow: ■ and all landscape architectural details for the first segment of the trail. 2012-2014 The design will set the standard for future design segments of Capital City Center for Changing ■ Bikeway segments. Landscapes: 2009-2012 ■ Port Covington, Baltimore, MD Coen+Partners: 2007-2009 As the TDG lead urban designer, Cindy was involved in developing the _ Humphrey Institute of Public ■ initial urban design principles and street network planning to guide Affairs: 2006-2007 the design of a 200 -acre brownfield redevelopment project on an old United States Ski and ■ industrial waterfront site in South Baltimore. She was instrumental- Snowboard Association in working with the interdisciplinary team of planners, architects and (USSA): 2000-2004 ■ engineers to develop a balanced land use and street design approach. CSAH 25 Road Corridor Redesign, Minnesota Education/Certifications ■ Cindy serves as the TDG project manager and lead urban designer. County Master of Urban and ■ State Aid Highway (CSAH) 25 is a main thoroughfare through the City Regional Planning, and of St. Louis Park and currently functions as a highspeed connection to Master of Landscape ■ an adjacent freeway. She is leading an interticiplinaryteam of planners, Architecture, University of engineersand landscape architectsto develop alternatives that create a Minnesota:2008 ■ bettersenseofplaceforthiskeycorridor.Theintent istocreateavibrant, Bachelor of Arts, Sociology, memorable experience that maximizes green infrastructure opportunities, St. Lawrence University: 1998 ■ creates safe and comfortable experiences no matter the mode of travel, and Certified Planner: American ■ stimulates redevelopment along the corridor. institute of Certified Planners Improving the Arborway, Boston, MA ■ Cindy is the lead urban designer working with the TDG Team to move Appointments/Affiliations the inital Arborway concept through design development and final American Planning ■ design.The design includes creating a 21st Century parkwaythat is safer Association environment for all modes of travel, maximizes experiential qualities of Association of Pedestrian ■ the site and incorporates placemaking opportunities. and Bicycle Professionals American Society of ■ Landscape Architects ■ ■ Avienda Development —Bluff Creek Boulevard Design ■ TEAM ORGANIZATION Projects like the Avienda Development project require an interdisciplinary approach, addressing transportation, recreation, urban design and land use planning. Toole Design Group (TDG) staff assigned to this project have the highest credentialsin the fields of civil engineering, landscape architecture, planning and graphics. This breadth will ensure that all angles are fully considered and the result is successful. We encourage you to review our resumes to learn more about the specific experience of the staff assigned to this project. Avienda Development — Bluff Creek Boulevard Design This page left intentionally blank. Toole Design Group Master -planned corporate campus with three phases including 1.2 million sq. ft. of office space, two parking ramps, eight stormwater ponds and utilities. The project also included design, construction and supervision of a one mile section of Technology Drive for the City of Eden Prairie. The site was designed to preserve a rare sedge meadow and minimize the overall impact Of development on existing wetlands. The plan includes an extensive trail system which winds through the campus and provides access to this unique natural environment. Project was selected from nearly 1000 nominations as one of the 'most innovative and challenging Twin Cities projects built in 2001 -2002 - and featured in Minnesota Construction Review, 2003. 2001 Completion LandfamS is a registered service mark of Landform f mfessional services, LLC. ADC for ADC Telecommunications World Headquarters Eden Prairie, Minnesota L A N D F 0 It 11 This multi -phase streetscape enhancement design combined innovative stormwater management techniques, enhanced ADA and transit facilities and a comprehensive palette of she amenities to reinvigorate two miles of urban thoroughfare within the City's commercial core. The precedent -setting design, developed with sensitivity to site context issues, has been followed by additional streetscape enhancements and private development. 2010 Completion 'Project completed by Danyelle Pierquet at a prior association. landform® is a registered service mark of Landform Professional services, I.I.C. Bass Cake Road and Xerxes Avenue for City of Brooklyn Center Streetscape Brooklyn Center, Minnesota L A N D F 0 R M 1-35W Transit Access Project Minneapolis, Minnesota for Hennepin County, MnDOT, City of Minneapolis, Metro Transit This project is a multi -agency partnership focusing on transportation between 32nd Street and the 1=35WI1-94 Commons area. The project includes: " ..........::............�..,,.. „�„a..:......,.. • Determining a- recommended location and preliminary design .�d'- •.-,. . . for a new Bus Rapid Transit station in the - median of 1-35W I • Preliminary design of 1-35W between 32nd and 1-94; including, the Lake Street/28th Street interchange • Guidance on streetscape features, landscaping, and pedestrian facilities - including creation of a high-quality pedestrian connection between Lake Street and the Midtown Greenway. 'Project completed by Danyelle Pferquet at a prior association. Landfwm® is a registered service mark of Landform Professional Services, U.C. L A N D F 0 R M This major downtown Minneapolis public open space. and transit facility perches on a formerly under-utilized sliver of land adjacent to the Twins Stadium and Hennepin Energy Recovery Center (HERC). A new LRT station for future Southwest LRT bridges a bowl - shaped open space functioning as the intensive green roof of a new office building and a parking ramp. LEED and B3 State of Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines shape the landscape design through: green roofs, permeable and light colored pavements, a stormwater cistern,. and an architectural shade structure, among others. 'Project completed by Danyelle Pierquet at a prior association. Landform® is a registered service mark of Landfdrm Professional Services, LLC. Target Field Station* Minneapolis, Minnesota for Hennepin County, City of Minneapolis, Metro Transit, Minnesota Twins Organization L A N D Pending reconstruction of a county road with limited -access to a 30 acre development parcel caused the need for a re -alignment of Sunwood - Drive in Ramsey, MN. The project was designed and built to accommodate traffic volumes in excess of 18,900 vehicles per day, whileproviding safe pedestrian and bicyclist. connections and creating more sale -able parcels within the development. Landform provided a full spectrum of services for the project including planning, surveying, platting, civil engineering, landscape architectural design, construction administration & development management coordination. 2013 Completion Landform® is a registered service made of Landon Professional Services, LLC. Sunwood Realignment for City of Ramsey Ramsey, Minnesota p L A N D F 0 R M West 70th Street Landscaping Edina, Minnesota for City of Edina The streetscape and gateway plantings were designed and constructed along this one -mile corridor (between Highway 100 and France Avenue) to highlight the neighborhood's agricultural background. A local artist/ -- philanthropistdonatedmaterials for the roundabout hardscape which was artfully integrated into the planting. The landscape architect worked closely with residents to facilitate the tree plantings on private property and with contractors to implement the plans. 2012 Completion 'Project completed by Danyelle Plerquet at a prior association. Landform® is a registered service mark of Landform Professional services, LLC L A N D F 0 R M PROJECT EXPERIENCE The following pages exemplify the Toole Design Group (TDG) Team's familiarity with projects similar to Avienda Development's Bluff Creek Boulevard design project. Avienda Development — Bluff Creek Boulevard Design Capital City Bikeway and Jackson Street Reconstruction Saint Paul, MN Toole Design Group (TDG) is leading one of the most important public realm improvements for the City of Saint Paul in recent history. As the first downtown project funded by the 8-80 Vitality Initiative, the Capital City Bikeway and Jackson Street Reconstruction Project will set the standard for implementation of green streets, placemakingt wayfinding and bikeway design in the urban core. The Capital City Bikeway will be a protected bikeway network in downtown Saint Paul that also connects to regional and state trail systems on the edge of downtown. Stakeholder engagement was a critical part of identifying routes and developing an urban design approach that includes a system of protected bikeways, improved pedestrian realm, branding and wayfinding, and innovative stormwater management. The Capital City Bikeway design's intent is to create a comfortable experience for all users of the transportation system, and to better connect pedestrians and bicyclists to key destinations in the heart of Saint Paul. TDG developed the Capital City Bikeway — Network Study and Design Guide, a document that will guide design and implementation as funding becomes available for additional routes within downtown Saint Paul. Toole Design Group Jackson Street is the first fully redesigned and reconstructed portion of the Capital City Bikeway, and TDG led the design and engineering for this key corridor. At the core of our approach was creating a memorable, inviting urban streetscape in the heart of downtown. The design includes widened walkways, a signature protected bikeway facility, green infrastructure elements, landscaped buffers, artistic elements and sitting areas. A State Aid variance was applied for and approved for reduced curb reaction and parking lane widths. TDG is leading the effort from conceptual design through construction documentation and administration. Client CityofSaintPaul Kevin Nelson, P.E., Project Manager 25 West Fourth Street 900 City Hall Annex Saint Paul, MN 55102' 651.266.6236 kevin.nelson@ci.stpaul.mn.us North Lynn Street Esplanade Arlington, VA Toole Design Group (TDG) managed a multidisciplinary team to conduct comprehensive planning and design efforts for improvements to -North Lynn Street, westbound Lee Highway and the Custis Trail in Rosslyn. The project will transform the area into an inviting pedestrian environment and improve multimodal safety, while maintaining efficient movement of traffic. Project elements include widened sidewalks, new street trees, LED street lights, planting areas, public art, crosswalk improvements, trail widening; bike lanes, signal and sign improvements. Coordination was conducted through the planning and design process with numerous agencies and stakeholders including the National Park Service, FHWA, VDOT, internal County Departments and the public. TDG was instrumental in demonstrating the project feasibility and gaining approvals for innovative project solutions such as narrowing and reducing lanes (lane diets and road diets) to improve modal balance. Technical project aspects included geometric and drainage design; structure design associated with complex retaining walls, modifications to the North Lynn Street Bridge over Interstate 66 and public art elements, and landscape and streetscape design. The project also involved the development of an Environmental Assessment as part of the NEPA process. Client Arlingtonlbunty Tom Hutchings, Project Manager 2100 Clarendon Boulevard Arlington, VA 22201 703.228.3809 thutch ing4a rl ingtonva.us Avienda Development — Bluff Creek Boulevard Design , R � I, hy�0ib6M, y1bsY.�.Y � 1 a 111111111/ ISI --_- - _ fllllllt Toole Design Group (TDG) managed a multidisciplinary team to conduct comprehensive planning and design efforts for improvements to -North Lynn Street, westbound Lee Highway and the Custis Trail in Rosslyn. The project will transform the area into an inviting pedestrian environment and improve multimodal safety, while maintaining efficient movement of traffic. Project elements include widened sidewalks, new street trees, LED street lights, planting areas, public art, crosswalk improvements, trail widening; bike lanes, signal and sign improvements. Coordination was conducted through the planning and design process with numerous agencies and stakeholders including the National Park Service, FHWA, VDOT, internal County Departments and the public. TDG was instrumental in demonstrating the project feasibility and gaining approvals for innovative project solutions such as narrowing and reducing lanes (lane diets and road diets) to improve modal balance. Technical project aspects included geometric and drainage design; structure design associated with complex retaining walls, modifications to the North Lynn Street Bridge over Interstate 66 and public art elements, and landscape and streetscape design. The project also involved the development of an Environmental Assessment as part of the NEPA process. Client Arlingtonlbunty Tom Hutchings, Project Manager 2100 Clarendon Boulevard Arlington, VA 22201 703.228.3809 thutch ing4a rl ingtonva.us Avienda Development — Bluff Creek Boulevard Design , R Improving the Arborway Boston, MA Toole Design Group (TDG) is working with the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) to design high-quality bicycle accommodations along the Arborway, a major gap for bicyclists in Olmsted's Emerald Necklace park system. The project area includes two large, high- volume traffic circles, Kelley Circle and Murray Circle, which process traffic from a complex network of local streets and vehicle -oriented parkways. The project aims to provide bicyclists as well as pedestrians with a seamless, comfortable route between two of the park system's most popular destinations Jamaica Pond and the Arnold Arboretum—and to connect at either end to two primary regional bicycle paths. Toole Design Group i TDG prepared an existing conditions report for the corridor including an assessment of regional and local bicycle connections, traffic analysis and current usage patterns by all modes. The TDG Team then conducted a three-day charrette with DCR staff, gathering local knowledge and priorities from public officials, community stakeholders and interested neighbors. At the end of this intensive work session, the team presented to the stakeholders and public a vision for the corridor, addressing community concerns, and kicking off a formal design process, which will result in construction documents. Client Department of Conservation and Recreation - Patrice Kish, Director, Office of Cultural Resources 251 Causeway Street, r Floor Boston, MA 02114 617.626.1378 patrice.kish@state.ma.us Port Covington Redevelopment Baltimore, MD Toole Design Group (TDG) is the multimodal transportation consultant for a nearly 200 -acre brownfield redevelopment project of an old industrial waterfront in South Baltimore. When complete, the massive mixed-use development is projected to have several thousand new jobs, residences and retail/commercial activities. The project developer, Sagamore Development Company, has adopted a 50% non -driving mode share goal for the project, a significant increase over Baltimore's average non - driving mode share of 16%. TDG has been charged with creating the premier multimodal transportation system in North America. This includes developing a site -wide bicycle network that includes best practices from the U.S. and abroad, such as cycle tracks, protected intersections and multi -use trails, and extensive use of low -impact design strategies. TDG is also developing concepts for enhanced transit service to the site, including new transit routes, an extension of Baltimore's light rail system, a new circulator and bike share. TDG's work includes coordination with the project team of urban designers, landscape architects and civil engineers, developing design plans and concepts for a multimodal transportation system that is connected to the city, and coordination with the City, Maryland Transit Administration and other stakeholders. Client Sagamore Development Company' Caroline Paff 1000 East Key Highway Baltimore, MD 21230 410.925.0258 cpaff@sagamoredevelopment.com Avienda Development — Bluff Creek Boulevard Design Atlanta Northwest Cycle Track Atlanta, GA Toole Design Group (TDG) provided traffic engineering and conceptual design services for a cycle track feasibility study in Atlanta, GA along a two- mile corridor from the intersection of Tech Parkway and Hampton Street to the intersection of Centennial Olympic Park Drive and Marietta Street. The study corridor included Tech Parkway, Luckie Street, Baker Street and Centennial Olympic Park Drive. TDG analyzed existing traffic conditions along the corridor for morning, midday, evening and event - hour traffic at 12 intersections in Synchro/SimTraffic to determine existing intersection operations. Based on the analysis, TDG made recommendations for turning lane adjustments that would be feasible under existing conditions, such as turn lane removals or the need for exclusive turn lanes. Toole Design Group Utilizing information from the existing traffic operations analysis, TDG developed conceptual cycle track designs for the corridor, focusing on 11 main intersections along the route and transitions between intersections. TDG developed two plan view concepts. One for long-term reconstruction conditions with curb head and sidewalk additions, and one for short-term conditions utilizing paint marking along the corridor with landscaping at critical locations. TDG developed No Build and Build Synchro/SimTraffic models for the year 2024 along the corridor. The No Build conditions provided a baseline comparison for impacts of implementing a cycle track along the corridor. Build concepts analyzed traffic with a cycle track in place along the corridor. Intersection configurations from the cpncept drawings were used for traffic analysis and adjusted where exclusive turn lanes were needed to maintain traffic operations through the corridor. Signal timing throughout the corridor was optimized to improve traffic operations under both the No Build and Build scenarios, including adding leading bike intervals, and travel times were calculated for comparison along the corridor. TDG presented findings and concepts at multiple stakeholder meetings with City staff, Georgia Tech staff and other surrounding business owners: Client Perez Planning + Design, LLC Carlos F. Perez, RLA, Principal 25314th Street, NE, Suite 9 Atlanta, GA 30309 404.416.0114 cperez@perezpd.com ■ r Lake Calhoun and Harriet Master Plan and Improvements Minneapolis, MN Toole Design Group (TDG) is working with the Minneapolis Parks and Recreation Board on a master plan for Lake Calhoun and Lake Harriet Chain of Lakes Regional Park. The park is the second most popular tourist destination in Minnesota, and the busiest park in the region with high rates of bicycling, walking, running,sailing, kayaking, swimming, fishing and other recreational activities. In addition, the area has high levels of vehicular and transit traffic to access the park area, but also to connect to the bustling Uptown neighborhood and nearby City of Saint Louis Park. TDG is assisting with community engagement, planning and engineering for multimodal transportation activity near and around the Iakes.Through close work with the surrounding neighborhoods, and a range of other stakeholders, TDG has identified priority places for improved safety, comfort and enjoyment for people biking, walking, driving and boating in the area. In addition, TDG is analyzing short, near and long-term improvements tothe transportation network and trails to improve movement and circulation throughout the parks, around the lakes and to neighboring businesses and residences. Client Minneapolis Parks and Recreation Board Deborah Bartels, RLA, Project Manager 2117 West River Road Minneapolis, MN 55411 612.230.6438 Avienda Development — Bluff Creek Boulevard Design ■ ■ Downtown Columbia Trail Columbia, MD b..fte.*L .t The Downtown Columbia Trail is a shared use path, system that will connect the Columbia Town Center and its surrounding neighborhoods, and promote bicycling and walking for the downtown area. The project extends 3.25 miles from Howard County General Hospital to Blandair Park. As lead consultant, Toole Design Group (TDG) was instrumental in the development of the project from the early concept stages and will continue to provide support through completion of construction. TDG's engineering and landscape architecture services included design of a 10 -foot wide shared use path with ADA -compliant intersection crossings; traffic signal modifications for reconfigured intersections; design of low -impact stormwater management features using permeable pavements and bioswales; design of pedestrian -scale LED trail lighting, pavement markings and regulatory signs; and erosion and sediment control measures. Trail amenities include wayfinding signs, and trail waysides featuring colored concrete pavers, seatwalls and benches as well as accent plantings that highlight the major connections and gateways. Toole Design Group During the design phase, TDG also provided assistance with easement acquisition and community outreach, and obtained all necessary Maryland State Highway Administration and Howard County permits. TDG additionally developed a set of Shared Use Path and On -Road Bicycle Facility Guidelines to be used for redevelopment of the Columbia Town Center. These guidelines provide recommendations of design concepts including, pathway and roadway engineering design, selection of materials, maintenance and operations, bicycle parking, lighting, planting and wayfinding intended to ensure that future development projects will adhere to the same high standards. TDG continues to provide services during the project's construction phase, addressing contractor requests for information, and performing periodic site visits to assess proposed changes in the field. Client The Howard Hughes Development Corporation Robert Jenkins, Project, Manager 10275 Little Patuxent Parkway Columbia, MD 21044 410.964.5443 robert.jenkins@howardhughes.com FHWA Guide forAchieving Multimodal Networks: Applying Design Flexibility and Reducing Conflicts p In recent years, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and other national organizations, including National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), and the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), have called for more flexibility in roadway design to ensure the safety of pedestrians, bicyclists and transit users. In response, FHWA developed the Guide forAchieving Muftimodal Networks: Applying Design Flexibility and Reducing Conflicts. Toole Design Group (TDG) was honored to serve as the author of this ground -breaking Guide. The purpose of the Guide is to assistjurisdictions, planners, and designers on how to reduce conflicts where various transportation modes intersect, through flexible standards and guidance found in the AASHTO Greenbook, the MIJTCD, the Public Rights -of -Way Accessibility Guidelines, the Highway Capacity Manual, the NACFO Urban Street Design Guide and other sources. This resource was released in August 2016. Client Federal HighwayAdministration Office of Human Environment Daniel Goodman, UhkbilityTeam HEPH-10, Room E74-430 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20,590 202.366.9064 daniel.goodman@dot.gov Avienda Development — Bluff Creek Boulevard Design ■ AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities ■ ■ Toole Design Group (TDG) served as the prime consultant for the 2012 edition of AASHTO Guide for ■the Developmentof Bicycle Facilities, and is leading a ■ multifaceted team of experts in research and design on the 2017 update. The AASHTO Bike Guide"is the ■ recognized national standard for the geometric design of bikeways in the U.S. • for a range of cyclists. ■ The 2012Guide covers many more topics than ■ previous editions of the Guide, including extensive guidance on signal design to accommodate ■ bicycles, greatly expanded guidance on designing ■ intersections between roadways and shared - use paths, and guidelines for designing bicycle ■ boulevards. The 2012 Guide also provides guidance on new configurations of bike lanes and buffered bike ■ lanes that acknowledge the many differences in street cross sections. Guide for the Deuelopm Bicgcle Facili 2W • Fourth Edition 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide Transportation Research Board Christopher Hedges, Senior Program Officer 500 Fifth Street NW Washington, DC 20001 202.334.1472 chedges@nas.edu 2017AASHTO Bike Guide The new Guide will provide important guidance on ■ innovative treatments such as bike signals, 'protected ■ intersections," and low stress bicycle networks. R will also address facilities such as one and two-way ■ protected bike lanes (cycletracks) and other facilities intended to provide higher levels of safety and comfort . for a range of cyclists. ■ ■ Toole Design Group Guide for the Deuelopm Bicgcle Facili 2W • Fourth Edition 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide Transportation Research Board Christopher Hedges, Senior Program Officer 500 Fifth Street NW Washington, DC 20001 202.334.1472 chedges@nas.edu 2017AASHTO Bike Guide National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine William Rogers, Senior Program Officer . 500 Fifth Street NW Washington, DC 20001 ■ 202.334.1627 wrogers@nas.edu r Toole Design Group Guide for the Deuelopm Bicgcle Facili 2W • Fourth Edition 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide Transportation Research Board Christopher Hedges, Senior Program Officer 500 Fifth Street NW Washington, DC 20001 202.334.1472 chedges@nas.edu ■ ■ ■ REFERENCES The clients below can attest to the Toole Design . Group (TDG) Team's past performance in delivering high-quality work. Additional references maybe provided upon request. • City of Saint Paul ' - Kevin Nelson, P.E., Project Manage[ 25 West Fourth Street 900 City Hall Annex ■ Saint Paul, MN 55102 651.266.6236 kevin.nelson@ci.stpaul.mn.us ■ Minnesota Department of Transportation Brett Benzkofer, P.E. District Design Engineer ■ MnDOT District 7 - Mankato . 507.304.6147 Brett.benzkofer@state.mn.us ■ Hennepin County Public Works Bob Byers, Senior Transportation Engineer ■ PO Box 1388 ■ Minneapolis, MN 55440 612.596.0354 ■ robert.byers@co.hennepin.mn.us ■ ■ r ■ ■ ■ • ■ Avienda Development - Bluff Creek Boulevard Design 35 . ■ Level 7 Development, LLC AVIENDA Chanhassen, MN APPLICATION FOR CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW September 30, 2016 L A N D From Site to Finish F O R M • • • 7 INTRODUCTION On behalf of Level 7 Development, Landform is pleased to submit this application for concept plan review for "Avienda", a mixed use Regional/Lifestyle Center at the southwest corner of intersection of Powers Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard. The property is dual guided Office or Regional Commercial and zoned Agriculture Estate west of Powers Boulevard and is guided Medium Density Residential and zoned Agriculture Estate for the 1.66 acres east of Powers Boulevard. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates development of this site as "Regional/Lifestyle Center Commercial". The plan notes that the vision for the site is: "A mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market. The physical environment emphasizes an attractive, comfortable walking experience for shoppers and visitors and is designed to serve trail users and mass transit as well as automobile traffic. Centers of this type have at least two major retail anchors and are characterized by the diversity and mix of retail and service uses within their boundaries. Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in the other commercial districts. Development of these centers shall be planned as a group of organized uses and structures to accommodate a sensitive transition between commercial activities such as loading, parking of automobiles, lighting and trash collection and surrounding residential uses. Such centers shall be designed with one theme, with similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials and a coordinated landscaping theme. Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system. Goods and Services Examples • Entertainment • Department Store • Comparison Shopping • Specialty Retail/Boutique • Restaurants • Hotels Residential A new zoning district Regional Commercial (RC) will be created in the City Code to implement this land use. The city has given a dual land use of the 118 acres at the southeast corner of Powers and Lyman Boulevards to accommodate this use." SCD140011EV - F O R M September 30, 2016 Project Narrative 2 CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW In 2015, the City reviewed a similar concept plan from Carlston Development for a portion of this site. The City provided feedback on the concept plan and ordered an AUAR update. Before the AUAR could begin, Level 7 Development acquired the property and decided to pause and take a fresh look at the site. The new development team completed the site analysis and reviewed the feedback that was received during that process. The design team has also reviewed a number of City documents before beginning development of our concept, including: • Chanhassen 2005 AUAR (dated December 8, 2003) prepared for the City by HKGi • The "Chanhassen Retail, Office and Residential Market Analysis and Development Potential' report (dated June 2006) prepared for the City by McComb Group, Ltd. • The 2007 City Survey • The 2010 City Survey • The 2013 City Survey • The Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance • The Chanhassen Subdivision Ordinance • The 2030 Comprehensive Plan (adopted November 10, 2008) • The comments provided during the 2015 review of the Carlston Development proposal Level 7 Development has been working to refine the plans for a mixed-use development concept that is . market -ready and consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. We are excited to provide a concept with a mix of potential uses that may include townhomes, apartments, office, medical and professional services, retail, entertainment and hospitality. The proposed mixed-use development will help the City achieve its goals of providing a variety of housing types for all people in all stages of the life cycle, providing a mixed commercial district with retail and ■ entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market, preserving natural resources through the protection of the Bluff Overlay district, and providing regional shopping options for existing residents and new residents as anticipated by the Comprehensive Plan. This plan incorporates a mix of ■ office, retail and residential space in an underserved area of the City. The project will be designed with one theme, with a similar high-end architectural style, similar exterior ® building materials and a coordinated landscaping theme as directed by the Comprehensive Plan. While ■ we have not yet defined all of these details, our submittal package includes a schematic concept plan to give some idea of the concepts we are currently evaluating. SCD140011EV L A N D F O R M September 30, 2016 . Project Narrative 3 V 3-b I F I OR 51tip-11 f--4-'"ers its , 1 Jul Design Concept The provided concept plan meets your Comprehensive Plan goals and includes approximately: • 50 acres of Regional Commercial (approximately 435,000 square feet) • 15 acres of Office (approximately 40,000 square feet) • 12 acres of higher density housing including with a potential for Market Rate Apartments (300 units) and Senior Living (100 units) 6 acres of Hospitality/Hotel uses (250 rooms) • 4 acres of Stormwater ponding • 16 acres of Conservation land • 1.6 acres of land at the southeast corner of Powers and Lyman Boulevard that is not proposed for development, but could be used in conjunction with the adjacent city land for regional or local stormwater/wetland improvements. The design vision for the Avienda development will be an integration of both traditional and contemporary elements that will ultimately establish a "timeless" character. Both visually and physically, architecture will play a major role in the overall design character for the development. High-quality materials including authentic stone, brick and masonry, architectural metal panels, and glass will be key elements that will establish this character. The pedestrian experience will establish the overall scale of the buildings and spaces, with interesting facades and carefully designed architectural elements, lighting, awnings and other unique features. Ample landscaping will be incorporated to create an inviting environment. We have worked to preserve the trees in the buffer area in the southwest portion of the site to provide a buffer between the proposed development and the existing homes on the south and west. We have also designed a plan that locates the medium and high density housing in these areas to provide a transition between the existing homes and the planned commercial uses. A comprehensive landscape plan will be developed to supplement the existing trees and support the design theme throughout the development. We expect different land uses in the development to have different landscape and architecture details, but many of the core design concepts will be threaded throughout the development. The landscaping plans will likely also include private amenities and street furniture that helps activate the streetscape and enhances the pedestrian experience by providing places to relax, rest, or meet friends. The streetscapes will be designed to reflect the different street characteristics within the development from local residential streets to collector streets intended to move traffic through the project. The concept plan shows construction of Bluff Creek Boulevard, a key east -west road connection between the existing neighborhood and Highway 212. Internal connections are provided within the development, SCD14001.LEV L A N D F O R M September 30, 2016 Project Narrative 4 ■ w including a connection to Lyman Boulevard on the north. Access points on Lyman Boulevard have been designed based on County plans. The road alignments may be modified slightly as we continue to develop the design and determine specific user requirements for this regional destination center. ■ Market Study The concept plan was developed based on a 2014 market study prepared by McComb Group, Ltd, a ■ consultant that the City has used in the past. The study reinforced the need for this development and the ■ findings to support the Regional/Lifestyle Center anticipated by the City's Comprehensive Plan. The 2014 study showed that this area could support 825,000 square feet to 1,120,000 square feet of new retail/commercial. Key takeaways from the June 2014 McComb study are described by the following ■ highlights from the executive summary: ■ • Trade area population of 407,361 in 2014, which is expected to increase to 438,533 in ■ 2019, an annual growth rate of 1.49 percent. • Trade area households grew at an annual rate of 1.94 percent between 2000 and 2010. During a slow growth period caused by the great recession, household growth averaged 1.0 percent annually. • Households are expected to increase at an annual growth rate of 1.5 percent from 157,810 in 2014 to 169,997 in 2019. • The trade area includes Carver and Scott counties, the two fastest growing counties in Minnesota. Between 2010 and 2013, population in Carver and Scott counties grew at . annual rates of 1.6 and 1.8 percent, respectively. ■ Trade area average household income of $103,006 in 2014 is 20 percent above the . Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA average household income of $85,611 and 41 percent above the United States average of $72,869. • Trade area median household income of $83,841 in 2014 is 55 percent above the national median household income of $53,958. • Trade area average household income is expected to increase to $110,603 in 2019, while median household income is expected to rise to $91,761, • In 2014, 60,100 households (38.1 percent) are estimated to have household income above $100,000 and is expected to increase to 71,000 (41.8 percent) in 2019. One- quarter of the households (42,113) are expected to have incomes above $150,000 in 2019. SCD14001.LEV L A N D F O R M September 30, 2016 Project Narrative 5 in in in IN • Families comprise 70 percent of all households in 2014 compared to 64.7 percent in the Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA and 66.6 percent in the United States. Trade area population age 25 plus is well educated with 30.4 and 13.1 percent that hold college and graduate degrees, respectively. This is well above the United States rategof 20.8 and 12.2 percent, respectively. • Trade area population in 2014 is 89.9 percent Caucasian followed by Asian/Pacific Islander (4.0 percent), African American (2.3 percent), Native American (0.4 percent) and Other (3.4 percent). Hispanic (any race) is 4.3 percent. • The trade area's many economic attributes, population, and upper income households provide support for retail stores, restaurants and services. This market study supports the need for this mixed use development on this property and details the unmet demand in the City. Our project will help the City of Chanhassen capture dollars that are currently leaving the City and provide services and amenities needed to support the existing and new residential development in this area. Our regional center will serve an unmet need in the community and will complement existing Chanhassen businesses. AUAR (Alternative Urban Areawide Review) The City completed the Chanhassen 2005 AUAR in 2003 for 624 acres, including this 114 acre site. MN Environmental Rules require that AUARs be updated every 5 years, but the AUAR has not been updated by the City despite the fact that much of the AUAR area have been developed since 2005. When the City updated the Comprehensive Plan in 2008, the City identified this property as a significant development opportunity within the City due in part to the residential development potential in the western portion of the City and the need to provide regional commercial for Chanhassen residents. While the AUAR was not updated with the Comprehensive Plan, the City did discuss land use changes from the residential land uses shown in the Chanhassen 2005 AUAR to the regional/lifestyle mixed use shown in the Comprehensive Plan. We ask that the City order an update to the 2005 AUAR (dated December 2003) for this area. The AUAR project area includes an area of approximately 624 acres, much of which has already been developed. We understand that the AUAR area encompasses far more area that the regional/lifestyle mixed use area ■ designated in the Comprehensive Plan or the area of our concept plan application, but we have agreed to fund the cost of the City's AUAR update. We believe the AUAR is important for the City to update in compliance with the Minnesota environmental rules and for us to better understand the development ■ issues for our project. SCD140011EV L A N D f O R M September 30, 2016 . Project Narrative 6 Is is . We request that the City initiate this AUAR update to reflect the land use and infrastructure changes since the original AUAR was developed. We believe this will reflect the City's Comprehensive Plan goals and will support the develop concept we have prepared. We look forward to working with the City to prepare ' the update and incorporating any findings into our development proposal. We request that the City Council re -order the AUAR as soon as possible. It, It is our understanding that a different developer approached the City in 2012 to discuss a potential mixed use development on this site and the City contracted with HKGi, at the developer's expense, to begin looking at development scenarios for an AUAR update. While the development did not proceed, and the AUAR was not updated, there were several development concepts prepared by HGKi for consideration. We have evaluated these alternatives as part of site analysis. We believe that our concept plan shares many of the same concepts developed by HKGi and responds to current market realities. In 2015, the City Council ordered an update to the AUAR, but it was not started. We now request that the City begin that work to update the 2003 AUAR to reflect the land use and infrastructure changes since the AUAR was developed. We believe that the AUAR will reflect the City's Comprehensive Plan goals and will support the develop concept we have prepared. We look forward to working with the City to prepare the AUAR update and incorporating any findings into our development proposal. SUMMARY We respectfully request review of our concept plan for this regional destination, lifestyle and mixed use center and we request that the City initiate the update of the AUAR. We look forward to the City Council work session on October 19, 2016, Planning Commission review on November 1, 2016 and City Council review on November 14, 2016. CONTACT INFORMATION This document was prepared by: Kendra Lindahl, AICP Landform 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 ■ Any additional questions regarding this application can be directed to Kendra Lindahl at klindahl(oNandform.net or 612.638.0225. ■ 0 N SCD140011EV F O R M September 30, 2016 Project Narrative 7 i r ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■. ■ ■ s s ■ ■ ■ i ■ i ■ ■ ■ ■ i ,� 42 A PROPOSED ACTION: The Planning Commission provide observations and feedback to the City Council on the Concept Planned Unit Development. PROPOSAL: Conceptual Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (PUD) of 6 parcels on approximately 118 acres of land LOCATION: Southwest corner of Powers Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard APPLICANT: Landform Professional Services LLC 105 South Fifth Ave Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55330 PRESENT ZONING: A-2 Agricultural Estate 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Office, Regional Commercial, and Medium Density Residential ACREAGE: Approximately 118 acres DENSITY: N/A SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The developer is requesting conceptual review to consider rezoning from Agricultural Estate to Planned Unit Development Regional Commercial. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION MAHING: The Planning Commission is providing the City Council with comments and direction on the Concept Planned Unit Development. PROPOSAL/SU]yIIVIARY e applicant is requesting a general concept plan review for a Planned Unit Development co:The site is currently zoned Agricultural Estate (A-2). With the adoption of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan in 2008, the City Counci the $etil atd for either O ce or Comm i the update of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the city considered two land use options for the subject properties: Office or Regional Commercial. The dual guiding allows the City Council to review the application for Regional Commercial to ensure it furthers the city's vision as stated in the Com hensive Plan and Zoning Ord' The 1.66 -acre parcel located east of powers Medium Densitysiden ' . The applicapt at this ' e. mprehensivieTjAnAzend use. Agricultural Estate not proposed-development-plans"lor this parcel t is necessary for any action to change the land 46 Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 2 of 37 The use of the PUD zoning also allows for greater specificity in the types, location and sizes of uses. The city has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would be the case with the other, more standard zoning districts. It is the applicant's responsibility to demonstrate that the city s expectations are to be realized as evaluated by the city's goals and policies (see Attachment #11— 2007 Community Survey questions asked regarding a regional mall). HISTORY OF THE ME A Concept PUD for a Regional Commercial zoning was approved by Planning Commission and the City Council in 2015. That application included 70 acres, this application is for 118 acres. The City Council did authorize the update of the AUAR (Alternative urban Areawide Review). The update was never executed. The development of the 118 acres in now under a new LLC and will be included in the AUAR. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 3 of 37 Parcel and Site Information Parcel ID Taxpayer Acreage Land Use Current Zoning 250230500 Level 7 Development Inc. 22.89 Office or Commercial A-2 Agricultural Estate 1.66 Medium Density A-2 Agricultural Estate 250230300 Level 7 Development Inc. 54.07 Office or Commercial A-2 Agricultural Estate 250230410 Level 7 Development Inc. 20 Office or Commercial A-2 Agricultural Estate 250230430 Level 7 Development Inc. 16 Office or Commercial A-2 Agricultural Estate 250230420 Level 7 Development Inc. 4 Office or Commercial A-2 Agricultural Estate Total 118.62 Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development - Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 4 of 37 The development plans describe the land use designations, but has not identified any specific uses. Staff has commented on this in the Market Study section. BACKGROUND 2030 Comprehensive Plan (verbatim language) VISION The land use change to either Office or Regional Commercial District as a part of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan was based on the city's vision for a lifestyle center. The Comprehensive Plan states: Grow Net Secbm Area Dev,�- Brekfrrg Area ParkK Urns/ () Area (S.F_) St3h Beds () 0 9.93 9.55 108,000 573 0 1.33 1.33 7,000 99 Legend 0 9.01 8.57 93,000 128 312 0 9.56 6.32 68,000 rda 72 FWmTrAcSVW ©Aj 5.33 2.97 50,000 197 0 2.58 2.58 30,000 191 ® BddmT1wkSOW 0 3.38 3.38 33,000 249 0 327 327 60,000 259 0 1.86 1.63 6,500 115 N& P4dOfWay 0 0 1.57 120 6,500 96 ® pig 0 2.04 1.64 6,500 119 0 1.83 1.83 7,000 104 r♦ecervd� Q 0 26.70 26.70 254,500 1364 ®wdwWard Ban 0 2.45 2.45 25.000 138 150 P40oral Own erdW 0 2.58 1.91 25,000 115 10D Me 0 3.45 3.02 40,000 108 92 ® 11.04 0.00 nfa rda rsende�I 0 15.88 0.00 nla Na The development plans describe the land use designations, but has not identified any specific uses. Staff has commented on this in the Market Study section. BACKGROUND 2030 Comprehensive Plan (verbatim language) VISION The land use change to either Office or Regional Commercial District as a part of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan was based on the city's vision for a lifestyle center. The Comprehensive Plan states: Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 5 of 37 2.7.4 Regional/Lifestyle Center Commercial "DeftmitionlVision: A mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market. The physical environment emphasizes an attractive, comfortable walking experience for shoppers and visitors and is designed to serve trail users and mass transit as well as automobile traffic. Centers of this type have at least two major retail anchors and are characterized by the diversity and mix of retail and service uses within their boundaries. Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in the other commercial districts. Development of these centers shall be planned as a group of organized uses and structures to accommodate a sensitive transition between commercial activities such as loading, parking of automobiles, lighting and trash collection and surrounding residential uses. Such centers shall be designed with one theme, with similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials, and a coordinated landscaping theme. Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system. Goods and Services Examples • Entertainment • Department Store • Comparison Shopping • Specialty Retail/Boutique • Restaurants • Hotels • Residential A new zoning district Regional Commercial (RC) will be created in the City Code to implement this land use. The city has given a dual land use of the 118 acres at the southeast comer of Powers and Lyman Boulevards to accommodate this use." ANALYSIS OF APPLICATION FOR REGIONAL COMMERCIAL In 2009 the city adopted standards and guidelines for a regional/lifestyle center commercial planned unit development. ZONING DISTRICT The RC Zoning District is found in the PUD District. Sec. 20-509. - Standards and guidelines for regional/lifestyle center commercial planned unit developments. (a) Intent. (1) The use of planned unit developments for regional/lifestyle center commercial purposes should result in a reasonable and verifiable exchange between the city Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 6 of 37 and the developer. This district is intended to provide for the development of regional and community scale integrated retail, office, business services, personal services and services to the traveling public near freeway interchanges. It shall strive to create a self-sustaining pattern of land uses with cultural, employment, entertainment, housing, shopping and social components. (2) The regional/lifestyle center commercial district is a mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market. The physical environment emphasizes an attractive, comfortable walking experience for shoppers and visitors. It shall be designed to serve pedestrian and mass transit users as well as automobile traffic. Centers of this type, generally, have at least two major retail anchors and are characterized by the diversity of mixed retail and service uses. Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in the other commercial districts. (3) Development of these centers shall be planned as a group of organized uses and structures to accommodate a sensitive transition between commercial activities such as loading, parking of automobiles, lighting and trash collection and surrounding residential uses. Such centers shall be designed with one theme, with similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials, and a coordinated landscaping theme, but shall avoid monotony in design and visual appearance. Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system. (b) Minimum lot size: 10,000 square feet (c) Minimum lot width at building setback: 100 feet. (d) Minimum lot depth: 100 feet. (e) Minimum setbacks: Building setbacks are also a function of the building height. As a building's height increases above 35 feet, the front, rear and project perimeter setback shall increase on a one-to-one basis. The increased setback shall only apply to that portion of the building that exceeds 35 feet, e.g., a 40 -foot tall building would be set back ten feet (front or rear) at that point where the building height equals 40 feet. A building height may step back, providing the setback/building height ratio is maintained. (1) PUD exterior: 30 feet. The 30 -foot PUD exterior setback may be changed, increased or decreased, by the city council as part of the approval process when it is demonstrated that environmental protection or development design will be enhanced. Building setbacks adjacent to exterior development lot lines abutting an area designated for residential use in the comprehensive plan shall be 50 feet, unless unique circumstances are found which would allow the city to reduce the setback requirement. (2) Front yard: 5 feet. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 7 of 37 (3) Rear yard: 5 feet. (4) Side ar - 0. Parking: (6) Setbacks (feet): Front: 10 Side: 10 Rear: 10 (7) Parking setback exemptions: a. There is no minimum parking setback when it abuts, without being separated by a street, another off-street parking area. b. Parking along public streets shall provide an appropriate transition, which shall incorporate such elements as landscaping, decorative fencing, public art, berming, etc. c. Parking setbacks adjacent to exterior development lot lines abutting an area designated for residential use in the comprehensive plan shall be 50 feet unless unique circumstances are found which would allow the city to reduce the setback requirement. Unique circumstances include site elevation, separation by natural features such as wetlands or stands of mature trees or substantial visual screening through berming and landscaping. (8) Parking standards shall comply with City Code for bq ..a a atioft--_ (f) Maximum building height: Commercial—retail 2 stories Commercial—services 3 stories Office 5 stories Residential 5 stories (g) Protection andpreservation of natural features. The applicant must demonstrate that the flexibility provided by the PUD is used to protect and preserve natural features such as tree stands, wetlands, ponds and scenic views. These areas are to be permanently protected as public or private tracts or protected by permanently recorded easements. (h) Landscaping plan. An overall landscaping plan is required. The plan shall contain the following: Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 8 of 37 (1) Boulevard plantings. Located in front yards shall require a mix of over -story trees and other plantings consistent with the site. Landscaped berms shall be provided to screen the site from major roadways, railroads and less intensive land uses. In place of mass grading for building pads and roads, stone or decorative blocks retaining walls shall be employed as required to preserve mature trees and the site's natural topography. (2) Exterior landscaping and double -fronted lots. Landscaped berms shall be provided to buffer the site and lots from major roadways, railroads, and less intensive uses. Similar measures shall be provided for double -fronted lots. Where necessary to accommodate this landscaping, additional lot depth may be required. (3) Foundation and yard plantings. A minimum budget or plan for foundation plants shall be established and approved by the city. As each parcel is developed in the PUD, the builder shall be required to install plant materials meeting or exceeding the required budget or prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy or provide financial guarantees acceptable to the city. �(4) Tree preservation. Tree preservation is a primary goal of the PUD. A detailed tree survey should be prepared during the design of the PUD and the plans should be developed to maximize tree preservation. (i) Architectural standards. The applicant should demonstrate that the PUD will provide for a high level of architectural design and building materials. While this requirement is not intended to minimize design flexibility, a set of architectural standards should be prepared for city approval. The primary purpose of this section is to assure the city that high quality design will be employed and that home construction can take place without variances or impact to adjoining lots. The PUD agreement should include the following: (1) Standards for exterior architectural treatments; (2) Streetscape requirements: a. Every building shall incorporate a streetscape, public realm space between the building and the roadway. The use of canopies, awnings or arcades is encouraged in these interfaces. b. Outdoor seating areas must be in a controlled or cordoned area with at least one access to an acceptable pedestrian walk. Seating areas may be shared by multiple uses. When a liquor license is involved, an enclosure is required around the outdoor seating area and the enclosure shall not be interrupted; access to such seating area must be through the principle building. Outdoor seating areas must be located and designed so as not to interfere with pedestrian and vehicular circulation. c. Streetscape elements shall include: Landscaping, lighting and street furniture such as benches, bus shelters, kiosks, planters, public art, tables and chairs, etc. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 9 of 37 To receive the Regional Commercial PUD zoning, the ordinance requires that the properly be under one owner control and be developed under a PUD. The developer is required to demonstrate that they are meeting the vision of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as well as the intent of the zoning district (Section 20-505) Concept PUD — What is required? Chapter 20 - Zoning, Article VIII. — Planned Unit Development District, Division 2. — Procedures Sec. 20-517. - General concept plan. (a) In order to receive guidance in the design of a PUD prior to submission of a formal application, an applicant may submit a concept plan for review and comment by the planning commission and city council. Submission of a concept plan is optional but is highly recommended for large PUDs. In order for the review to be of most help to the applicant, the concept plan should contain such specific information as is suggested by the city. Generally, this information should include the following information appropriate to the type of development, e.g., commercial, industrial or residential: (1) Approximate building areas, pedestrian ways and road locations; (2) Height, bulk and square footage of buildings; (3) Type, number or square footage or intensities of specific land uses; (4) Number of dwelling units; (5) Generalized development plan showing areas to be developed or preserved; and (6) Staging and timing of the development. (b) The tentative written consent of all property owners within the proposed PUD shall be filed with the city before the staff commences review. Approval of the concept statement shall not obligate the city to approve the final plan or any part thereof or to rezone the property to a planned unit development district. (c) The final acceptance of land uses is subject to the following procedures: (1) The developer meets with city staff to discuss the proposed developments. (2) The applicant shall file the concept stage application and concept plan, together with all supporting data. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 10 of 37 (3) The planning commission shall conduct a hearing and make recommendations to the City Council. Notice of the hearing shall consist of a legal property description, description of request, and be published in the official newspaper at least ten days prior to the hearing. Written notification of the hearing shall be mailed at least ten days prior thereto to owners of land within 500 feet of the boundary of the property and an on-site notification sign erected. (4) Following the receipt of the report and recommendations from the planning commission, the city council shall consider and comment on the concept plan. The PUD process provides an opportunity to receive clear direction from Planning Commission, City Council and residents of Chanhassen. The city's expectation is that the proposed development will be of higher quality and create a sense of place and identity for the community. The development shall provide regional and community scale including retail, office, and service uses that complement existing commercial uses in the downtown and provide shopping opportunities not currently located in the community. The development must also be sensitive to environmental features on site including topography, vegetation, wetlands and scenic views. Finally, the project should have appropriate transitions between uses. One of the comments of the Concept PUD review will be an update to the Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) which was done in 2003. The traffic component will be one of the most critical elements that needs to be updated. The amount of traffic being generated and the impacts to the surrounding transportation system will need to be examined. The traffic study and its impacts may affect the land use recommendations. In order to best determine the intensity of development for the AUAR, staff is recommending that the applicant proceed to the PUD development stage (per City Code Section 20-508). This stage requires submittal of a preliminary plat and fees. After review of the development stage, a condition of final approval will be completion of the update to the AUAR. RETAIL MARKET STUDY In June 2014, the McComb Group, Ltd. completed a Trade Area Demographic, Characteristic and Sales Potential for the Chan -212 area. The executive summary comments include, "Chan -212 trade area's many economic attributes, population, and upper income households provide support for retail stores, restaurants and key services." The developer had not disclosed his specific uses with this application, but based on the marketing study it is apparent a grocery storelsupermarket is a potential use. In a previous meeting with staff, the developer indicated that: • The Shopping Goods Store Type — categorized as clothing and accessories, furniture, home furnishings, electronics, sporting goods, hobby and music is significantly underrepresented in the project's primary trade area and the sales of this merchandise category from the primary trade area are being captured in other distant trade areas. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 11 of 37 The Chanhassen trade area is growing and creating additional sales potential for grocery stores. In addition, the Chanhassen "outflow grocery sales" are higher than normal. This suggests that trade area residents may be dissatisfied with existing grocery shopping options. The study indicated the ability of the trade area to support a new grocery store in excess of 90,000 square feet without creating hardship for existing grocery retailers. In addition, other potential uses include warehouse clubs and supercenters, building supply and home centers. (Staff report continued on the next page) Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 12 of 37 The Convenience Goods trade area, shown on Map 5, includes Chanhassen, Chaska, and portions of Eden Prairie, Shakopee, Carver, Victoria, Shorewood, Minnetonka, and Excelsior, along with portions of Jackson, Louisville, Dahlgren, and Laketown Townships. This trade area extends north to Lake Minnetonka, east to Highway 212 and I-494, south to Highway 41 in Shakopee, and west to Laketown Road in Laketown Township. The Convenience Goods trade area covers approximately 88 square miles centered on Chanhassen. Map 5 CHAN-212 CONVENIENCE GOODS TRADE AREA Scan+US. Inc. and McComb Group, (Staff report continued on the next page) Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 13 of 37 The Shopping Goods trade area covers the southwest Metropolitan Area, as shown on Map 6, extending 60 miles west and encompassing over 2,100 square miles. General boundaries are six miles north of Highway 7, east to Highway 100 in Bloomington/Edina, south to Highway 22 just south of LeSueur, and west five miles from Highway 4 in Hector. Map 6 CHAN-212 SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREA fyya fCkdL elkwrow r ren-. lttcnlncm F. S3lmgi (k •Ai K!• lfll' � ^a.lafl � awoava. Source: ScaWUS, Inc. and n�r>nnx ONRe cbmt g061 fi.IRf 6�MiM't h� txr 4Aeen .•-"•ai iv !fin 5r;n3.�n MarhkM t„,,. t.Mr 11lAf.!FiYt � 1. ti.r.. Nu10 Le C01W (Staff report continued on the next page) Ciu t1"' SPK i, Cp1i4MF Ca ltt Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development - Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 14 of 37 Table 28 CHAN-212 POTENTIAL GROSS LEASABLE AREA Gross Leasable Area Store Category Low High Convenience Goods 105,000 135,000 Shopping Goods Anchor Stores 120,000 220,000 Junior Anchors 220,000 315,000 Inline Stores 110,000 180,000 Subtotal 450,000 715,000 Food Service Restaurants 20,000 30,000 Fast Food 15,000 20,000 Subtotal 35,000 50,000 Services 20,000 30,000 Destination Stores Health Club 50,000 60,000 Home Center 115,000 115,000 Cinema 50,000 60,000 Subtotal 215,000 235,000 TOTAL 825,000 1,165,000 Somce: McComb Group, Ltd Shopping goods retailers are stores where comparison shopping is a common part of the shopping trip. Department stores typically anchor these shopping centers. Potential anchor store GLA ranges from 120,000 square feet to 220,000 square feet (This would be in total square feet not building foot print). Junior anchor retailers are various size stores, ranging in size from 10,000 square feet to 50,000 square feet, also adding to the center's drawing power. Junior anchor GLA could range from 220,000 square feet to 315,000 square feet. Inline, small store tenants could range from 110,000 square feet to 180,000 square feet. Total shopping goods stores could range from 450,000 square feet to 715,000 square feet. Food service establishments are expected to range from 35,000 square feet to 50,000 square feet. Services of various types could range from 20,000 square feet to 30,000 square feet. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 15 of 37 Destination retailers like health clubs, home centers, and cinemas, could total 215,000 square feet to 235,000 square feet if all three are located at Chan -212. It is possible that not all the anticipated potential tenants will locate at Chan -212 indicating that the shopping center is likely to be between 800,000 square feet and 1,000,000 square feet. Source: McComb Group, Ltd. *See Attachment #7 — "Sales Potential and Supportable GLA" for more specifics on uses and square footage. Planning Departments Comments When the city was considering the land use change on the site in 2006-07, there was much discussion about this area having uses different from the downtown. The downtown area is intended to be the uses that meet the daily needs of residents, and the regional mall site was envisioned to be those uses that would be more of a comparison shopping that would serve a regional market including: Goods and Services Examples • Entertainment • Department Store • Comparison Shopping • Specialty Retail/Boutique • Restaurants • Hotels • Residential In lieu of any descriptions of this information, staff has the following comments based on a Commercial/Regional Retail Development Diagram (see Attachment #13) showing building areas, type, number, square footage or intensities of specific land uses. 1. A pattern of buildings and uses that might be oriented around a central public promenade, street, or public space of some sort, and when looked at together form a `regional" commercial destination. Given the land area available in Chanhassen (100± acres), and in understanding the market, this concept would not necessarily be seen as a' dale" type of shopping center, but possibly more like a "Shoppes at Arbor Lake," or the new outlet center in Eagan (paragon outlets/Eagan outlets) off of 77 and 13, or the Woodbury Lakes Development. 2. Such a center might include a collection of buildings with footprints ranging from as small as a 3,000 to 5,000 square -foot restaurant to a 100,000 square -foot multi -tenant buildin . Anchors might be more in the 35,000 to 75,000 square -foot range (i.e. JCP y, Kohl' Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods, Gander Mountain, Cabela's etc.). A more likely scenario would be the smaller restaurant users or supporting commercial users in the 3,000 to 10,000 Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 16 of 37 square -foot range with individual spaces within a larger building, but maintaining individual entrances facing the public space, promenade, plaza, or street. 3. Mixing in entertainment, hotel, and to a degree some residential uses could allow for shared parking. This assumes that people come to this area for the experience and that they park once and visit many locations; as opposed to more convenience retail where people are only coming to this store for a quick shopping visit (i.e. discount retailers, pharmacy, grocery, hardware, building materials etc.). Based on the lack of specificity in the types and sizes of uses, staff is recommending a list of permitted and prohibited uses consistent with the Comprehensive Plan (see recommendation for use and square footage below). The applicant will be required to create a PUD district with a list of specific uses. Staff is has provided recommendations for uses base on the in intent of the RC Zoning District Sec. 20-509. Again the intent of this district: The use of planned unit developments for regional/lifestyle center commercial purposes should result in a reasonable and verifiable exchange between the city and the developer. This district is intended to provide for the development of regional and community scale integrated retail, office, business services, personal services and services to the traveling public near freeway interchanges. • The regional/lifestyle center commercial district is a mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market. Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in the other commercial districts. (Staff report continued on the next page) i Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 17 of 37 Recommendation for Use and square Footage X v' Square Footage Square Footage USE Merchandise Category SIC Code Tenant (mmmsum) Tenant (maximum) Convenience Goods Specialty Food Stores: bakeries, candy, dairy, 542, 543, deli, f iitss & vegetables, meat & fish, nut & 544, 545, confectionary 546 and 549 700 18,000 Food Service: restaurants, eating and drmkm& no drive thin 581 and 582 200 10,000 Other. drug, florist, liquor, miscellaneous, 5912, 5921, newsstand, optical and tobacco 599 700 Specialty Grocery 541 10,000 25,000 Shopping Goods General department store 5311 90,000 150,000 Apparel & Accessories: clothing and shoes 561 900 28,000 Furniture & Home Furnishing 571 1,200 37,000 Electronics & Appliances 572 & 573 900 26,000 5941, 5942, 5943,5944, Other: art, book, camera, cosmetic, game, gift, 5945, 5946, bobby, jewelry, leather, huggage, novelty, pet, 5947, 5948, photography, sewing, souvenir, sporting goods 5949 and and stationary 5999 1 600 45,000 Services Personal: aduh care, miscellaneous, photography, 722,=729 tax preparation, — and 835 900 8,000 Personal: salons and spas 723 and 724 900 8,000 Recreation chubs and spas 7991 1,400 33,000 )T 801, 802, 803,804 Health care: cl'mics and, offices and 809 1 900 60,000 61, 62, 63, 651,653, 654, 67, 73, 87 (not Offices: professional services 8734) 200 60,000 Theater. motion and theatrical 783 and 792 1,300 50,000 otel(250rooms) 7011 5,000 65,000 auk and financial institutions 60 900 20,000 Residential To be detenmmed with PUD, assume 550 units of high and mediums density TOTAL 116,7001 643,000 Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 18 of 37 Prohibited Uses SIC Code Automobile, Boat, Recreational Vehicles, Motorcycle and Truck, Mobile Home dealers and Suppilies 527, 55, 751 Automotive Repair and Services 76 Building Materials 521, 523, 525, & 526 Car wash 754 Convenience store with gas 5411, 5541 Day Care 835 Discount Store 533 Dry cleaning 721 Elementary and secondary schools, public or private 82 Fast Food Restaurant with drive thru 5812 Gas Station 5541 Grocery Stores 5411 Hardware 5251 Hospitals 805,806 Liquor Store 592 Membership organizations 86 Motor vehicle repair and parts 76 Nursing Homes 805 Residential Care fact ies 805,836 Supermarkets 5411 Theater Warehouse Club 533 Wholesalers 51 Engineering Comments The concept plan includes the extension of Bluff Creek Boulevard from its current terminus to Powers Boulevard. Bluff Creek Boulevard is a Municipal State Aid Route therefore the design is subject to review and approval of MNDOT's State Aid Office. The roadways should be aligned to encourage traffic to use Bluff Creek Boulevard for the development. The roadway however should be designed to discourage cut -through traffic to Audubon Road or Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 19 of 37 Pioneer Trail. The plan shall include a connection to the existing stub street on the northwest corner of the area to the single-family development to the west (Mills Drive) and a connection to the existing emergency exit within the Camden Ridge single-family development to the south. An internal public road that loops through the development is proposed. The plan includes a roundabout on Bluff Creek Boulevard just west of Powers Boulevard. A public loop road- Avienda Parkway- is proposed on the north side of the Bluff Creek Boulevard extension to provide access to the retail, office and medium -density residential uses. Another roundabout or some other traffic calming feature on Bluff Creek Boulevard should be considered at the western intersection of Bluff Creek Boulevard and Avienda Parkway as a demarcation between the Avienda mixed use development and the existing residential uses to the west. A full access is proposed at Lyman Boulevard and aligns with Sunset Trail to the north. The AUAR update will examine this intersection and include recommendations evaluate if the intersection meets signal warrants. The AUAR will also look at pedestrian movements at this intersection to see if an enhanced pedestrian crossing is warranted if a signal is not. (Staff report continued on the next page) Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 20 of 37 As part of the AUAR update the developer shall complete a traffic study based on the proposed land uses. The study shall include the following: • Updated current and 20 -year projected traffic volumes • Analysis of turning movements • Level of service analysis, including recommendations for improvements should the projected level of service fall below the acceptable level • Analysis of existing and proposed tum lanes to the development and recommendations for stacking lengths and signalization warrants • Analysis of potential cut -through traffic on Bluff Creek Boulevard/Bluff Creek Drive to the west of the site. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 21 of 37 Based on the existing elevations where the development improvements connect to Powers Boulevard, Lyman Boulevard, Bluff Creek Boulevard and Mills Drive the developer will have unique opportunities to utilize the grade differences to enhance the development, such as walkout medium density units and preservation of the majority of the wetland complex at Powers Boulevard/Bluff Creek Boulevard intersection. The water main proposed for the developed shall be modeled to confirm the sizing is adequate for peak use and fire flows. Water Resources Comments Wetland Protection The final updated delineation reveals eight (8) wetland basins covering 6.15 acres of land. One wetland, WL9 received an agricultural exemption. Wetland I and 2 were found by the Technical Evaluation Panel to be hydrologically connected and, therefore, the applicant's consultant was required to revise the boundary as shown in purple on the following exhibit from Kjolhaug Environmental Services. The city is still awaiting the GIS compatible, georeferenced shapefiles for final approval of the delineated boundary. Chanhassen City Code enumerates ten purposes for the Wetland Protection ordinance. Among these ten is the restriction and mitigation of the harmful effects of development on wetlands. All activities within the city shall be governed by the MN Wetland Conservation Act. Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Under Minnesota State Law and Chanhassen City Code §20-402 through 20-421 wetland impacts should be avoided were feasible to do so. This proposal makes little effort to avoid wetland impacts on the site. As shown m the conceptual plan for the site, all but one of the basins will be filled in their entirety for a total direct wetland impact of 5.57 acres. The remaining wetland, a low quality Type 1 basin, dominated entirely by reed canary grass, would have a high probability of secondary impact as the concept plan routes surface water runoff away from the remaining wetland. The Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act was passed in 1991 (MN Statute 103A and MN Rule Chapter 8420) with the purpose of; • achieving "no net loss in the quantity, quality, and biological diversity of Minnesota's existing wetlands"; • increasing "the quantity, quality, and biological diversity of Minnesota's wetlands by restoring or enhancing diminished wetlands"; • avoiding "direct or indirect impacts from activities that destroy or diminish the quantity, quality, and biological diversity of wetlands;" and • replacing "wetland values where avoidance is not feasible and prudent." Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 22 of 37 It is very important to note that MN Rules part 8420.520. Subpart 3.0 (2) clearly defines what is "feasible and prudent" as follows. "An alternative is considered feasible and prudent if it meets all of the following requirements: (a) it is capable of being done from an engineering point of view; (b) it is in accordance with accepted engineering standards and practices; (c) it is consistent with reasonable requirements of the public health, safety, and welfare; (d) it is an environmentally preferable alternative based upon a review of social, economic, and environmental impacts; and (e) it would create no truly unusual problems." That subpart goes on to describe the city's obligations under when reviewing avoidance alternatives. "(3) The local government unit must consider the following in avoidance alternatives as applicable: (a) whether the basic project purpose can be reasonably accomplished using one or more other sites in the same general area that would avoid wetland impacts.... (b) The general suitability of the project site and alternate sites considered by the applicant to achieve the purpose of the project; (c) Whether reasonable modification of the size, scope, configuration or density of the project would avoid impacts to wetlands; (d) Efforts by the applicant to accommodate or remove constraints on alternatives imposed by zoning standards or infrastructure, including requests for conditional use permits, variances, or planned unit developments; (e) The physical, economic, and demographic requirements of the project. Economics alone do not make an alternative not feasible and prudent; and (f) The amount, distribution, condition, and public value of wetlands and associated resources to be affected by the project and the potential for direct and indirect effects over time. (4) If the local government unit determines that a feasible and prudent alternative exists that would avoid impacts to wetlands, it must deny the replacement plan. If it is determined that there is no feasible and prudent alternative that would avoid impacts as described above, then Chanhassen must determine if the applicant has demonstrated that they have minimized impacts to the wetlands. The minimization follows the same basic rigor and review as described for avoidance. Further augmenting the "feasible and prudent alternatives" case is that the original AUAR showed three concepts that significantly minimized wetland impacts on the site. (See page 3 of the Avienda Concept Submittal packet.) The two higher quality wetlands were, in particular, saved from impacts. A memorandum from Ben Meyer of the Minnesota Board of Soil and Water Resources, dated 10/19/16 and attached, echoes these concerns. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 23 of 37 Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will likely have authority over some of the wetland on the subject Properties. While the Joint Notification Application allows for concurrent review processes, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issues their own permit with their own criteria. Approval from the City as the LGU responsible for administration of the Wetland Conservation Act does not translate directly into federal approval. Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency must review and determine that any fill placement is compliant with the state water quality standards. The wetland on the subject property drain to either Lake Susan or into Bluff Creek. Both of these water bodies are impaired. (Staff report continued on the next page) Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 24 of 37 Figure 2 -Existing Conditions (2013 Carve Photograph) N 0 500 The District at Vincent lad (KES 2015-013) 1Fee[ CHOW BDusen, Mirrmsota ,� Noix Bountlelks IntlPalotl JO�AUC mtloon wMiappmsima� (►� GWIRONYF_\-fM.6ERYiCE5 C0lIPAW ntl0o rotm amappan 1/'�I 9 .tlIG ESRII.Wyl P OffG4l5"yP dE rlyure 1 - upootea weriano aeuneation including additional areas in purple. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 25 of 37 Mitigation for Approved Wetland Impacts Just as there are sequencing requirements for wetland impacts, there are also sequencing requirements for wetland replacement (mitigation). Section 20416 (b) (3) of Chanhassen City Code describes where mitigation can occur. These are, in descending order of preference; 1. On-site 2. Locally within the same sub -watershed elsewhere in the city; 3. Off-site within the same major watershed or through the purchase of wetland credits. Minnesota Rules 8420.0522 sets out the replacement standards if it is determined that the impacts are unavoidable or cannot be restored over time. The replacement wetland(s) must replace the public value of wetlands lost. One of the functions some of the wetlands serve on the subject property have to do with flow augmentation and/or amelioration within Bluff Creek. It will be important that any impacts deemed unavoidable are mitigated for within the Bluff Creek watershed. The minimum replacement ratio will be 2:1 if the replacement is "in-kind" and within the same watershed or 2.5:1 if the replacement is "out -of -kind" or outside the watershed. Given the impaired status of the downstream receiving waters, any approved unavoidable wetland impacts should be mitigated in the same minor watershed. Subpart 7 of the same section of Minnesota Rules sets requirements for the siting of replacement wetlands as follows in descending order of preference: 1. In the same minor watershed as the impacted wetland; 2. In the same major watershed as the impacted wetland; 3. In the same county as the impacted wetland; 4. If replaced through banking, then in the same wetland bank service area; or 5. In an adjacent bank service area provided it is also a less than 50% wetlands remaining bank service area. The Federal Clean Water Act also has mitigation requirements. Generally, replacement wetland meeting the above will satisfy the Section 404 requirements although this is not always the case. It will be the applicant's responsibility to assure that they meet the Section 404 requirements. The applicant needs to show an adequate sequencing argument for the extent of the proposed impacts. Water Quality Protection This site drains to one of two water bodies (see figure 2). Generally, the northeast portion flows to Lake Susan which has an impairment for excessive nutrients. The remainder of the site drains to Bluff Creek which has a turbidity impairment and an impairment for indices of biological integrity. Any stormwater management plan must consider these impairments as both are within one -mile of the site. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 26 of 37 NPDES Construction Permit This development will be subject to the rules of the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System Program (NPDES Construction Permit) issued August 1, 2013. This permit requires that the permittee manages the stormwater such that during project construction and upon completion there is no violation of state water quality standards. Part III.D states: Where a project's ultimate development replaces vegetation and/or other pervious surfaces with one (1) or more acres of cumulative impervious surface, the Permittee(s) must design the project so that the water quality volume of one (1) inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project is retained on site (i.e. infiltration or other volume reduction practices) and not discharged to a surface water. For purposes of this part, surface waters does not include man-made drainage systems that convey stormwater to a compliant permanent stormwater management system. For those projects where infiltration is prohibited (see Part III.D.1 j.), the Permittee(s) shall consider other methods of volume reduction and the water quality volume (or remainder of the water quality volume if some volume reduction is achieved) must be treated by a wet sedimentation basin, filtration system, regional ponding or equivalent methods prior to the discharge of stormwater to surface waters. NPDES MS4 Permit Chanhassen is permitted to discharge stormwater under the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Small Municipal Storm Sewer Systems Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System Program (MS4) issued August 1, 2013. The MS4 permit requires Chanhassen, as a permittee, to develop a post - construction stormwater management program. This program must give the highest preference to "Green Infrastructure" practices such as conservation design, infiltration and reuse. New development must result in no net increase from pre -project conditions of stormwater volume, stormwater discharge of total suspended solids and total phosphorus. Riley Purgato1y Bluff Creek Watershed District Rule J Rule J requires that the 1.1 inches of runoff from impervious surface of a parcel must be abstracted on-site. hi addition, the stormwater management must achieve 60% removal of total Phosphorus and 90% removal of TSS on an annual basis. These removals are consistent with the National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) recommendations and the volume is consistent with the NPDES permit requirements. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 27 of 37 Planned Unit Development District Section 20-501 lists 9 elements which are to be included in a planned unit development. These elements are consistent with low impact design (LID) and better site design practices. The preservation of significant ecological resources and open space is a primary reason for allowing the use of PUD. The first three speak directly to this goal: (1) Preservation ofdestrablesite characteristics and open space and protection ofsensitive environmental features, including steep slopes, mature trees, creeks, wetlands, lakes and scenic views. (1) More effldent and effective use afford, open space and public facilities through mixing of land uses and assembty and development of land in larger parcels. (3) High qualityofdesign and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. Site planning, landscaping and building architecture should reflect higher quality design than is found elsewhere in the community. This would lend to preservation of wetlands, woodlands and topographic features through thoughtful consideration during site layout and through the use of practices such as terrain - adaptive architecture. Bluff Creek Overlay District The woodland area lies within the boundaries of the Bluff Creek Overlay District. In addition, wetland 4 lies entirely within the Bluff Creek Overlay District and feeds the large mitigation area to the south. This overlay district is intended to protect Bluff Creek, preserve natural conditions and to establish a corridor of "interconnected open space" throughout the entire system for ecological, recreational and educational benefit. Section 20-1561 (a) stipulates that "natural habitat areas within the primary zone shall be preserved as permanent open space." This would be consistent with the intent of the PUD and could very possibly be used as mitigation for wetland impacts although that must be determined in context of wetland preservation as a whole. (Staff report continued on the next page) Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 28 of 37 Landscauin2 Comments Subject Site Existing natural features on the site include a tree windrow in the center of the property, landscaping around the existing homes, natural vegetation around the wetlands and a large native woodland in the southwest comer. The developer is proposing to preserve some of the wooded area in the southeast comer. This woodlot falls entirely within the Bluff Creek Corridor Primary Zone and is intended for preservation. The woodlot is of high quality and consists of native species of trees and shrubs with minimal invasive species present. Landscaping requirements for Commercial/Office areas: • Parking lot landscaping requirements o Use less individual islands and more extended planting spaces and areas o Use extended planting areas for both landscaping requirements and stormwater management infiltration basins o Incorporate landscape materials and design that requires minimal irrigation • Bufferyard landscape requirements o Bufferyards will be required around perimeter as well as differing uses within the development • Foundation plantings • Boulevard trees along public streets • Landscape area/green space requirements Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 29 of 37 o Preferable to have minimum mowed turf areas. Use prairie or no mow mixes in low use areas o Employ capture -and -use irrigation systems for development In Residential areas: • Tree Preservation/Canopy Coverage requirements Use a diverse mix of species for planting • Bufferyard requirements • Foundation plantings • Boulevard trees along public streets • Landscape area/green space requirements Preferable to have minimum mowed turf areas. Use prairie or no mow mixes in low use areas Employ capture -and -use irrigation systems for development Bluff Creek Overlay District Entire wooded area in southwest comer within Primary Corridor therefore should be identified for preservation Conservation area should remain undisturbed and the feature should be worked around to signify a higher quality of development standards for the site. Carver County Comments (from 2015) This development was studied to some extent during the Lyman Boulevard Project development process. The owners (Dorsey and Fox) were very involved. They requested Lyman Boulevard be designed to accept a 100% retail development on the property even though the comprehensive plan guides the lifestyle center. We had SRF Consulting perform a traffic study of the AUAR option, the comprehensive plan option and the 100% retail option to determine impacts to our project. There are severe impacts to Powers Boulevard dependent on the land use and some to Lyman Boulevard. Obviously the development will require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), but the SRF study is a good place to start. Other comments we have at this point are: Future right-of-way needs for Lyman and Powers Boulevards will need to be addressed, especially in the areas of the intersections. Walk and trail locations need to be determined and accommodated along the roadways, adequate right-of-way or easements need to be preserved. Utilities will need to be addressed during design. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 30 of 37 Park Comments The proposed Lifestyle Center (PUD) is located within the city's 2005 Metropolitan Urban Service Area. This region of the city is currently in transition from primarily agricultural uses to residential, commercial, industrial, and office uses. In concert with this change in land use, the city's Community Development Department implemented two key planning processes—the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan (Bluff Creek Overlay) and the Alternative Urban Area Wide Review (AUAR). Comprehensive Park Plan The city's comprehensive park plan calls for a neighborhood park to be located within one-half mile of every residence in the city and a community park/public school facility to be located within one to two miles of each residence. The proposed lifestyle center site is situated within the community park service area of Bandimere Community Park and the Chanhassen High School campus. However, the proposed residential housing within the concept is outside the one-half mile service area of any existing neighborhood parks in the area. Neighborhood Parks Provide opportunities for informal recreation close to home. Developed primarily for unstructured active recreation such as field games, court games, play equipment and trail opportunities. Must be easily accessible to residential areas with safe walking and biking access on trail networks. Sites need well -draining soils and flat terrain to accommodate active play features. To fulfill the comprehensive plan guidance for providing neighborhood park services, the application needs to include a public neighborhood park component. The proposed recreational site would be best associated with the existing woodlands situated in the southwest comer of the PUD. The park space needs to be of sufficient size to accommodate traditional park attractions including an open play field, playground and hard surface sport court. The site should seek to be accessible to the residential units in a barrier -free pedestrian manner. A park dedication requirement either in the form of land dedication or the payment of park fees or a combination of both will be a component of any agreed upon conditions of approval for the proposal. Park fee credit is not granted for the inclusion and/or construction of private recreation amenities. Comprehensive Trail Plan The city's comprehensive trail plan includes existing trails located to the north, east and southwest of the proposed Lifestyle Center PUD. All proposed structures and spaces within the PUD need to be connected by a combination of pedestrian walkways, sidewalks and trails to Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 31 of 37 these existing pedestrian trail corridors. Existing trail improvements include the Lyman Boulevard Trail, the Powers Boulevard trails and the Bluff Creek Boulevard trails. Consideration should be given to providing a pedestrian connection through the preserved woodlands to the Camden Ridge development via Miranda Way. Park and Recreation Commission Review On Tuesday, October 25, 2016, the Chanhassen Park and Recreation Commission took public comment and discussed desired park, open space, recreation, and trail components for the proposed Avienda concept planned unit development (PUD). Commissioners focused on making the development a highly desirable and livable environment for future residents and how best to integrate the site into the existing neighborhoods and landforms. Below is the Park and Recreation Commission's list of recommendations at the concept level: • Incorporate meaningful park -like places, including the provision of appropriate recreation equipment, site furnishings, and landscaping adjacent to both the townhome and apartment neighborhoods. • Preserve the woodlands identified in the Bluff Creek Overlay District to the greatest extent possible. The Commission envisions nature trails within a portion of the woodlands. • Significantly increase the walkability of the core retail space to encourage pedestrian interaction by providing wide sidewalks, numerous gathering locations, interesting site furnishing, landscaping, and hardscapes. • Provide well-designed sidewalks and pedestrian connections to all buildings and locations. • Incorporate traffic calming into all pedestrian crossing locations. • Design, incorporate, and construct a comprehensive on-site system of trails, including: 1. A trail running west to east from Bluff Creek Boulevard through the upper portions of the woodlands continuing east along the southern border of the property, then turning north adjacent to Powers Boulevard. 2. An internal trail positioned north to south within the townhome neighborhood allowing residents to gain access as pedestrians to adjacent destinations. 3. A thoughtfully designed, formal access that welcomes pedestrians from the intersection of Lyman and Powers Boulevard directly into the proposed development. 4. Completion of the emergency roadway connection with Miranda Way to be utilized as a trail way except in the event that north/south emergency vehicle access is needed. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 32 of 37 Buildine Official Comments 1. The buildings are required to have automatic fire extinguishing systems. 2. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Soil evaluation (geo-technical) report required. 4. Retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. BIG BOX RETAIL / MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT Consideration for a lifestyle center was what was contimplated with the 1st Comprehensive Plan. paln recommenditon for the potentail Regional Commerical land use. A lifestyle center is a shopping center or mixed -used commercial development that combines the traditional retail functions of a shopping mall with leisure amenities oriented towards upscale consumers as well as residential uses in a walkable environment. The plan for this development must be consistent with the vision for the site. There are numerous examples of regional commercial developments int the metro area. Examples of Mixed Use Development The Villages at Arbor Lakes PUD Concept Plan, while having big box uses in close proximity, provides a comparison of distribution of uses by type. This example is for illustrative comparison only. (Staff report continued on the next page) Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 33 of 37 Summary of Uses Avienda Arbor Lakes Apartments 404 units 752 units Townhouses 72 units 10 Hotel 250 rooms 206 rooms Office 173,000 sq. ft. 64,000 sq. ft. Restaurants 33,500 sq. ft. 40,000s .ft. Retail 362,500 sq. ft. 383,000 sq. ft. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 34 of 37 ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION 1. What is the city's vision for this area: Is it big box retail, mixed-use development or lifestyle area? The Comprehensive Plan gives specific goods and services examples: a. Entertainment, department stores, comparison shopping, specialty retail/boutique, restaurants, hotels and residential. 2. Design considerations a. Design internal circulation to encourage pedestrian interaction and activity by providing sidewalks, gathering place; and interesting landscaping. b. Establish gateway at the boundaries of the district. c. Create a distinct identity through the use of consistent signage, street graphics, lighting and landscaping. d. Encourage sidewalk activity by developing amenities into all major pedestrian areas. Amenities should include coordinated street furniture trash and recycling containers, bus shelters, paving, landscaping and lighting. e. Provide architectural elements, such as sculpture, public art and unique signage into the development including streetscapes to establish a strong district identity. 3. Outcomes from the 2040 Visioning exercise (April 2016) a. Why we choose to live & work here: Small town feel Within easy striking distance of big city amenities Parks, lakes & trails Open space; recreational opportunities Community values Family -friendly; healthy; engaged; close knit Kid -friendly Strong schools; beautiful parks; safe; neighborly Great downtown Attractive; walkable Safe Low crime Strong city services Community amenities; can get almost everythinghere Affordable Housing; low taxes Special attractions Chanhassen Dinner Theatres; library; fishing; 4t° ofJuly! Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 35 of 37 b. Why Chanhassen? Great community Small town feel in an urban area: Family oriented Beautiful Excellent schools Prince c. Lifestyle Center People care about each other; we are good neighbors; people are engaged, helpful, friendly (13 responses) Everything we need is here yet we are close to big city amenities (6 responses) Great place to raise a family (4 responses) Clean, safe and beautiful (4 responses) Choice, quality (2 responses) He lives here/is my neighbor (2 responses) Priority Medium for 3 groups; high for 2 groups Positives Helps bring new residents attracted to vibrant lifestyle and services Helps retain current residents who appreciate amenities/quality of life Job growth Considerations - Potential negative impact on downtown; should be planned to complement downtown - Environmental impact - Traffic impact on Highway 5 Suggestions Must be welcoming for seniors Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 36 o£37 RECOMMENDATION "The Planning Commission provides observations and feedback on the Concept Planned Unit Development along with the following comments: To receive Regional Commercial zoning, the ordinance requires that the property be under one owner and be developed under a Planned Unit Development. The developer is required to demonstrate that they are meeting the vision of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as well as the intent of the zoning district. 2. In order to best determine the intensity of development for the AUAR, staff is recommending that the applicant proceed to the PUD development stage (per City Code Section 20-508). This stage requires submittal of a preliminary plat and fees. After review of the development stage, a condition of final approval will be completion of the update to the AUAR. 3. As part of the AUAR update, the developer shall provide a fiill Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) based on the proposed land uses. The study shall include the following: • Updated current and 20 -year projected traffic volumes • Analysis of turning movements • Level of service analysis, including recommendations for improvements should the projected level of service fall below the acceptable level • Analysis of existing and proposed turn lanes to the development and recommendations for stacking lengths 4. With the Preliminary PUD, the developer shall address the comments in the staff report from a. City Engineering b. Water Resources Coordinator c. Environmental Resources Specialist d. Parks and Recreation e. Building f. Planning - including list of permitted and prohibited uses. g. Carver County (Staff report continued on the next page) Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 37 of 37 ATTACHMENTS 1. Development Review Application. September 30, 2016 2. Application for Concept Plan Review September 30, 2016 3. Concept Submittal Exhibit dated September 30, 2016 4. Email John Thomas Transportation Manager Eastern Carver County Schools dated 10-6-16 5. Email form Center Point Energy dated 10-10-16 6. Email from MN Board of Water and Soil Resources datedl0-19-16 7. 2007 Community Survey questions asked regarding a regional mall. 8. Chapter VI -Sales Potential and Supportable GLA excerpt from Trade Area Demographic, Characteristic and Sales Potential for the Chan -212 Area, prepared by the McComb Group, Ltd. 9. Affidavit of Mailing Notice of Hearing GAPLAN\2016 Planning Ca \2016-25 Avimda - Chan Retail Site\PC Staff Report COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address—P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-13001 Fax: (952) 227-1110 *CI'fY0FC9ANgASSEN APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Submittal Date: PC Dale:11� CC Date: �=+ -. 60 -Day Review Date: (Rehr to the appropnote Application Checklist for required submittal inimmation that must accompany this application) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment... ..................... . $600 ❑ Subdivision (SUB) ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ..... $100 ❑ Create 3 lots or less ........................................$300 ❑ Create over 3 lots .......................$000+$15 per lot ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (pty) ❑ Single -Family Residence ................................ $325 ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots).... .............................. $300 ❑ All Others......................................................... $425 ❑ Consolidate Lots .............................................. $150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment.........................................$150 ❑ Interim Use Permit (IUP) F1 Final Plat....................................................$700 ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)` E]All Others ....................................................... $425 *Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Rezoning (REZ) E Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 ❑ Vacation of Easements)Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD ................. $100 (Additional recording fees my apply) ❑ All Others......................................................... $500 ❑ Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 ❑ Sign Plan Review ................................................... $150 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... $150 ❑ Administrative.................................................. $100 ❑ All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Commerciallindustrial Districts`....................r $500 ❑Zoning Appeal ...................................................... $100 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: i thousand square feet) ElZoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) ................. $500 *Include number of i n employees: *Include number of 2y employees: ❑Residential Districts ...................... ............. $ 500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, Plus $5 per dwelling unit (_ units) the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. 0 Notification Sign (City to install andrenroee).................................... .......... _..................... .................................. .............. .$200 ❑ Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate ager pre -application meeting) .................................................. $3 per address (_ addresses) ❑ Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply) _... ....... .._.... ......—......................................... $50 per document ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation ❑ Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) ❑ Easements( easements) TOTAL FEE: $950.00 Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: See Attached Narrative Property Address or Location: SW corner of Powers Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard Parcel #: See Attached Legal Description:. Total Acreage: 118.00 Wetlands Present? ® Yes ❑ No See Attached Present Zoning: Agricultural Estate District (A2) Requested Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Present Land Use Designation: Commercial Requested Land Use Designation: Commercial Existing Use of Property: single family home and vacant, agriculture land Check box is separate narrative is attached. Section 3: PropertyOwner and Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, 1, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc, with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Landform Professional Services, LLC Contact Kendra Lindahl Address: 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513 Phone: (612) 638-0225 City/State/Zip: Minneapolis, MN 55330 Cell: (612) 290-8102 Email: klindahl@landform.net Fax: (612) 252-9077 KdraLindahl, AICP DoUlys "°°°'"°'""L" ACP en Signature: oW:M®.o=7M51a= Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, 1, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Level 7 Development Contact: Bahram Akradi Address: �C-60O =-EMO Kings Point Road Phone: g52_ ZZr7 _ 7 4� 77 City/State/Zip: Minnetrista, MN 55331 Cell: vl / 2 — 9 12 _ m 1 Z Email: 46 arAw'tA ®Lr% ^'K r' CA J" Fax: Signature: ,Ar Date: _� _ Z8— Z o t � This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Landform Professsional Services, LLC Contact: Steven Sabraski Address: 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513 Phone: (612) 638-0243 Cfty/State/Zip: Minneapolis, MN 55401 Cell: Email. ssabraski@landform.net Fax (612)252-9077 Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? *Other Contact Information: Property Owner Via: Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: ❑� Applicant Via: Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: ❑ Engineer Via: []Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other' Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device, PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing (required). SAVE FORM PAINT FORM SUBMIT FORM Level 7 Development, LLC AVIENDA Chanhassen, MN APPLICATION FOR CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW September 30, 2016 L A N D F O R M s '+a^ Sete to Prish INTRODUCTION On behalf of Level 7 Development, Landform is pleased to submit this application for concept plan review for'Avienda', a mixed use Regional/Lifestyle Center at the southwest comer of intersection of Powers Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard. The property is dual guided Office or Regional Commercial and zoned Agriculture Estate west of Powers Boulevard and is guided Medium Density Residential and zoned Agriculture Estate for the 1.66 acres east of Powers Boulevard. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates development of this site as "Regional/Lifestyle Center Commercial". The plan notes that the vision for the site is: "A mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market. The physical environment emphasizes an attractive, comfortable walking experience for shoppers and visitors and is designed to serve trail users and mass transit as well as automobile traffic. Centers of this type have at least two major retail anchors and are characterized by the diversity and mix of retail and service uses within their boundaries. Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in the other commercial districts. Development of these centers shall be planned as a group of organized uses and structures to accommodate a sensitive transition between commercial activities such as loading, parking of automobiles, lighting and trash collection and surrounding residential uses. Such centers shall be designed with one theme, with similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials and a coordinated landscaping theme. Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system. Goods and Services Examples • Entertainment • Department Store • Comparison Shopping • Specialty Retail/Boutique • Restaurants • Hotels • Residential A new zoning district Regional Commercial (RC) will be created in the City Code to implement this land use. The city has given a dual land use of the 118 acres at the southeast corner of Powers and Lyman Boulevards to accommodate this use.' SCD14001.LEV L A N D F O R M September 30, 2016 Project Narrative 2 CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW In 2015, the City reviewed a similar concept plan from Cariston Development for a portion of this site. The City provided feedback on the concept plan and ordered an AUAR update. Before the AUAR could begin, Level 7 Development acquired the property and decided to pause and take a fresh look at the site. The new development team completed the site analysis and reviewed the feedback that was received during that process. The design team has also reviewed a number of City documents before beginning development of our concept, including: • Chanhassen 2005 AUAR (dated December 8, 2003) prepared for the City by HKGi • The "Chanhassen Retail, Office and Residential Market Analysis and Development Potential" report (dated June 2006) prepared for the City by McComb Group, Ltd. • The 2007 City Survey • The 2010 City Survey • The 2013 City Survey • The Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance • The Chanhassen Subdivision Ordinance • The 2030 Comprehensive Plan (adopted November 10, 2008) • The comments provided during the 2015 review of the Carlston Development proposal Level 7 Development has been working to refine the plans for a mixed-use development concept that is market -ready and consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. We are excited to provide a concept with a mix of potential uses that may include townhomes, apartments, office, medical and professional services, retail, entertainment and hospitality. The proposed mixed-use development will help the City achieve its goals of providing a variety of housing types for all people in all stages of the life cycle, providing a mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market, preserving natural resources through the protection of the Bluff Overlay district, and providing regional shopping options for existing residents and new residents as anticipated by the Comprehensive Plan. This plan incorporates a mix of office, retail and residential space in an underserved area of the City. The project will be designed with one theme, with a similar high-end architectural style, similar exterior building materials and a coordinated landscaping theme as directed by the Comprehensive Plan. While we have not yet defined all of these details, our submittal package includes a schematic concept plan to give some idea of the concepts we are currently evaluating. SC0140011EV L A N D F O R M September 30, 2016 Project Narrative 3 Design Concept The provided concept plan meets your Comprehensive Plan goals and includes approximately: • 50 acres of Regional Commercial (approximately 435,000 square feet) • 15 acres of Office (approximately 40,000 square feet) • 12 acres of higher density housing including with a potential for Market Rate Apartments (300 units) and Senior Living (100 units) • 6 acres of Hospitality/Hotel uses (250 rooms) • 4 acres of Stormwater ponding • 16 acres of Conservation land 1.6 acres of land at the southeast comer of Powers and Lyman Boulevard that is not proposed for development, but could be used in conjunction with the adjacent city land for regional or local stormwater/wetland improvements. The design vision for the Avienda development will be an integration of both traditional and contemporary elements that will ultimately establish a "timeless" character. Both visually and physically, architecture will play a major role in the overall design character for the development. High-quality materials including authentic stone, brick and masonry, architectural metal panels, and glass will be key elements that will establish this character. The pedestrian experience will establish the overall scale of the buildings and spaces, with interesting facades and carefully designed architectural elements, lighting, awnings and other unique features. Ample landscaping will be incorporated to create an inviting environment. We have worked to preserve the trees in the buffer area in the southwest portion of the site to provide a buffer between the proposed development and the existing homes on the south and west. We have also designed a plan that locates the medium and high density housing in these areas to provide a transition between the existing homes and the planned commercial uses. A comprehensive landscape plan will be developed to supplement the existing trees and support the design theme throughout the development. We expect different land uses in the development to have different landscape and architecture details, but many of the core design concepts will be threaded throughout the development. The landscaping plans will likely also include private amenities and street furniture that helps activate the streetscape and enhances the pedestrian experience by providing places to relax, rest, or meet friends. The streetscapes will be designed to reflect the different street characteristics within the development from local residential streets to collector streets intended to move traffic through the project. The concept plan shows construction of Bluff Creek Boulevard, a key east -west road connection between the existing neighborhood and Highway 212. Internal connections are provided within the development, SCD140011EV L A N D F O R M September 30, 2016 Project Narrative 4 including a connection to Lyman Boulevard on the north. Access points on Lyman Boulevard have been designed based on County plans. The road alignments may be modified slightly as we continue to develop the design and determine specific user requirements for this regional destination center. Market Study The concept plan was developed based on a 2014 market study prepared by McComb Group, Ltd, a consultant that the City has used in the past. The study reinforced the need for this development and the findings to support the Regional/Li estyle Center anticipated by the City's Comprehensive Plan. The 2014 study showed that this area could support 825,000 square feet to 1,120,000 square feet of new retail/commercial. Key takeaways from the June 2014 McComb study are described by the following highlights from the executive summary: Trade area population of 407,361 in 2014, which is expected to increase to 438,533 in 2019, an annual growth rate of 1.49 percent. Trade area households grew at an annual rate of 1.94 percent between 2000 and 2010. During a slow growth period caused by the great recession, household growth averaged 1.0 percent annually. Households are expected to increase at an annual growth rate of 1.5 percent from 157, 810 in 2014 to 169,997 in 2019. The trade area includes Carver and Scott counties, the two fastest growing counties in Minnesota. Between 2010 and 2013, population in Carver and Scott counties grew at annual rates of 1.6 and 1.8 percent, respectively. Trade area average household income of $103,006 in 2014 is 20 percent above the Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA average household income of $85,611 and 41 percent above the United States average of $72,869. Trade area median household income of $83,841 in 2014 is 55 percent above the national median household income of $53,958. Trade area average household income is expected to increase to $110,603 in 2019, while median household income is expected to rise to $91,761. In 2014, 60,100 households (38.1 percent) are estimated to have household income above $100,000 and is expected to increase to 71,000 (41.8 percent) in 2019. One- quarter of the households (42,113) are expected to have incomes above $150,000 in 2019. SCD14001.LEV L A N D F O R M September 30, 2016 5 Project Narrative Families comprise 70 percent of all households in 2014 compared to 64.7 percent in the Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA and 66.6 percent in the United States. Trade area population age 25 plus is well educated with 30.4 and 13.1 percent that hold college and graduate degrees, respectively. This is well above the United States rates of 20.8 and 12.2 percent, respectively. Trade area population in 2014 is 89.9 percent Caucasian followed by Asian/Pacific Islander (4.0 percent), African American (2.3 percent), Native American (0.4 percent) and Other (3.4 percent). Hispanic (any race) is 4.3 percent. The trade area's many economic attributes, population, and upper income households provide support for retail stores, restaurants and services. This market study supports the need for this mixed use development on this property and details the unmet demand in the City. Our project will help the City of Chanhassen capture dollars that are currently leaving the City and provide services and amenities needed to support the existing and new residential development in this area. Our regional center will serve an unmet need in the community and will complement existing Chanhassen businesses. AUAR (Alternative Urban Areawide Review) The City completed the Chanhassen 2005 AUAR in 2003 for 624 acres, including this 114 acre site. MN Environmental Rules require that AUARs be updated every 5 years, but the AUAR has not been updated by the City despite the fact that much of the AUAR area have been developed since 2005. When the City updated the Comprehensive Plan in 2008, the City identified this property as a significant development opportunity within the City due in part to the residential development potential in the western portion of the City and the need to provide regional commercial for Chanhassen residents. While the AUAR was not updated with the Comprehensive Plan, the City did discuss land use changes from the residential land uses shown in the Chanhassen 2005 AUAR to the regional/lifestyle mixed use shown in the Comprehensive Plan. We ask that the City order an update to the 2005 AUAR (dated December 2003) for this area. The AUAR project area includes an area of approximately 624 acres, much of which has already been developed. We understand that the AUAR area encompasses far more area that the regional/lifestyle mixed use area designated in the Comprehensive Plan or the area of our concept plan application, but we have agreed to fund the cost of the City's AUAR update. We believe the AUAR is important for the City to update in compliance with the Minnesota environmental rules and for us to better understand the development issues for our project. SCD14001.LEV L A N D F O R M September 30. 2016 Project Narrative 6 We request that the City initiate this AUAR update to reflect the land use and infrastructure changes since the original AUAR was developed. We believe this will reflect the City's Comprehensive Plan goals and will support the develop concept we have prepared. We look forward to working with the City to prepare the update and incorporating any findings into our development proposal. We request that the City Council re -order the AUAR as soon as possible. It is our understanding that a different developer approached the City in 2012 to discuss a potential mixed use development on this site and the City contracted with HKGi, at the developer's expense, to begin looking at development scenarios for an AUAR update. While the development did not proceed, and the AUAR was not updated, there were several development concepts prepared by HGKi for consideration. We have evaluated these alternatives as part of site analysis. We believe that our concept plan shares many of the same concepts developed by HKGi and responds to current market realities. In 2015, the City Council ordered an update to the AUAR, but it was not started. We now request that the City begin that work toupdate the 2003 AUAR to reflect the land use and infrastructure changes since the AUAR was developed. We believe that the AUAR will reflect the City's Comprehensive Plan goals and will support the develop concept we have prepared. We look forward to working with the City to prepare the AUAR update and incorporating any findings into our development proposal. SUMMARY We respectfully request review of our concept plan for this regional destination, lifestyle and mixed use center and we request that the City initiate the update of the AUAR. We look forward to the City Council work session on October 19, 2016, Planning Commission review on November 1, 2016 and City Council review on November 14, 2016. CONTACT INFORMATION This document was prepared by: Kendra Lindahl, AICP Landform 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Any additional questions regarding this application can be directed to Kendra Lindahl at klindahl(a)landform.net or 612.638.0225. SCD140011EV L A N G F O R M September 30, 2016 7 Project Narrative AVIENI�A c v':, LEVEL Z DEVELOPMENT RSP ARCH!TECTS -DflLL1ERS INTERNATIONAL Ea� AVISANN AVIENDA • Chanhassen; MN �i L A N' D f 0 R M c v':, LEVEL Z DEVELOPMENT RSP ARCH!TECTS -DflLL1ERS INTERNATIONAL Ea� AVISANN AVIENDA • Chanhassen; MN �i i s c v':, LEVEL Z DEVELOPMENT RSP ARCH!TECTS -DflLL1ERS INTERNATIONAL Ea� AVISANN AVIENDA • Chanhassen; MN LakeAnno Chanhassen Arboretum / 1 x Downtown Chanhassen lAV. t.A, zi ,- Chanhass School " ` Ri Alar en High Sc �.. Pa -Moll .k Project Site 11 ; R L .r Lake Bavaria k Hazeltine Lake • :' flying Cloud Airport Lake Riley .'. Chaska High School }'� ! `J.:; 1 '` ' , t fG• ". - . Std v` s It 212 Medical Center �p a '' '��• Available Land tlot ' �- VOW � � AC �- + t nye qt : - _ - .�" " - F.:tI,• ..�-_.._;"''SQ"rs; ? '.vr. r, A Existing Trail I Sidewalk 7 t4 �y '��.• 1 .s t ,. - ,_ Rice Lake aR " �:� 4 ��.:e_ Zi .i� TI *.d_ '." '�- a,y�✓'� W y� � ` .1 .. R 'it' _ Ir x ' _� ,.' .. : T tom( . •- ' '- y - � • r LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT L A IV D f C R M RSP ARCHITECTS • COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL AVIENDA • Chanhassen. MN EdgeSSensevetoAdjacent Use �' \� s i � 1 \� l ' Access to Lyman Blvd • —___� i }ExistingWetlands _ tt y e C Potential Connection ignaled Access+ Existing Residential __ >r ^ 7 .. Neighborhood Access AwwF w -- �F. ; " 1 Densely Wooded Knoll f, ' Emergency Access 0 6:aburabon %%4th: LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT L A. N RSPARCHITECTS-COLLIEPSINTERNATi0NA'L AVIENDA • Chanhassen, MN Land Uses from 2012 HKGi AUAR Concepts (constrained to project site) CONCEPT 1 (Acres) Ilk CONCEPT 2 (Acres) oi�_ CONCEPT 3 f 30.3 Regional Commercial 17.4 Office 13.5 High Density Res. 19.8 Medium Density Res, - Stormwater Conservation ! 3 Regional Commercial Office - Mixed Use L - High Density Res. - Medium Density Res. Stormwater - Conservation - Regional Commercial Office High Density Res. Medium Density Res. - Stormwater - Conservation 9.56 Ac • 3 c "z 3 , na ..:L L7 WELOPMENi L A N D F 0 R p; RSP 7 BSiNTE ;9TIONA 5.33 Ac 2.58 Ac 1 3.38 Ac — — It �_ -- - AVIENDA PFRKWAV �- - 1.33 Ac 3.27 Ac 1 1.86 Ac 1.57 Ac I 2.04 Ac 7'l l 1.83 Ac Land Uses 2016 Proposed Concept (Acres) =Regional Commercial 14.56 Office 9.01 Ac 2.58 Ac 12.46, High Density Residential 2.45 Ac 9.93 Ac 9.56 Medium Density Residential 3.45 Ac _Alternative BMPs may be implemented in plan 15.88 Conservation 15.88 Ac 11.04 Right -of -Way *Site plan is for illustrative 113.79 Total Development purposes only and is = subject to change. (Acres) K � Aux , AVIENDA CD m � -IF F � I ® f"Imjpq *Site plan is for illustrative purposes only and is subject to change. P RErmu W.USF Legend i, Future Traffic Signal ® Existing Traffic Signal ® ShAI Count Building Area Public f8ght Of way 0 Units) Ponding m.00ssv mmesE rSpppSe i S,Wf SFvggipG,ES Beds i CS IL4E Ofnff[ .. High Density Residential �J Medium Density Residential 9.93 9.55 108,000 G C` 0 C-1 l -O = C AVIF Nr)A ` PARKWAY - 11' a (J L $_J CD m � -IF F � I ® f"Imjpq *Site plan is for illustrative purposes only and is subject to change. P RErmu W.USF Legend i, Future Traffic Signal ® Existing Traffic Signal ® ShAI Count Building Area Public f8ght Of way 0 Units) Ponding m.00ssv mmesE rSpppSe ss.SOpSF Beds Regional Commeroal Office High Density Residential �J Medium Density Residential 9.93 9.55 108,000 573 0 1.33 1.33 7,000 99 0 9.01 8.57 93,000 128 312 0 9.56 6.32 68,000 Na 72 0 5.33 2.97 50,000 197 000* 2.58 2.58 30,000 idim 0 3.38 3.38 33,000 249 0 3.27 3.27 60,000 259 0 1.86 1.63 6,500 115 0 CD m � -IF F � I ® f"Imjpq *Site plan is for illustrative purposes only and is subject to change. P RErmu W.USF Legend i, Future Traffic Signal ® Existing Traffic Signal ® ShAI Count Building Area Public f8ght Of way 0 Units) Ponding G' Preservation (S. F.) Wetland and Buffer Beds Regional Commeroal Office High Density Residential �J Medium Density Residential Regional Mao Net Section q� Developable Building Area Parking Units) (A) Area (S. F.) Stalls Beds (Acres) 0 9.93 9.55 108,000 573 0 1.33 1.33 7,000 99 0 9.01 8.57 93,000 128 312 0 9.56 6.32 68,000 Na 72 0 5.33 2.97 50,000 197 0 2.58 2.58 30,000 191 0 3.38 3.38 33,000 249 0 3.27 3.27 60,000 259 0 1.86 1.63 6,500 115 0 1.57 1.20 6,500 96 0 2.04 1.64 6,500 119 0 1.83 1.83 7,000 104 0 26.70 26.70 254,500 1364 0 2.45 2.45 25,000 138 150 0 2.58 1.91 25,000 115 100 0 3.45 3.02 40,000 108 92 0 11.04 0.00 nla Iva 0 15.88 0.00 We ruta Total ®� 1 - Wr A j — .Ty4:06f.16fWE5 � �� OFFILEB .: AMENOAPARKWA, CENTER VIL OPTION 1 Wt� � AVIENDA - z OiFlCFC c 1��8F o1S1CFE5� �' i. Q Q� L L. Pflli IETK lE1K � x A9005F 6IDOSf n.®SF_ G — _ ,P E •I '04 ® -- R *Site plan is for illustrative purposes only and is subject to change. �� , 1 Ga C • E I a l I ! i 225K : n �� _f [ 225K . 7K 25K r11 =r OPTION 2 OPTION 3 Aanenson, Kate From: Thomas, John <ThomasJohn@District112.org> Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 9:36 AM To: Kahring, DeeDee; Brecht, David; Aanenson, Kate Cc: Bauck, James Subject: RE: Agency Review Request - Avienda Residential, Commercial, Hotel & Office Concept Plan Good morning Kate — Dee Dee Kahring forwarded your email communications to me regarding the proposed development at Lyman and Powers Blvd. I've reviewed the proposal, and I have one concern regarding the High Density Residential area. Referring to the Land Uses 2016 Proposed Concept graphic on page 4, it appears that the smaller HDR (3.45ac) will only be accessible using parking lots or a secondary road/driveway. My concern is, as the Transportation Manager of the school district, that we don't want to route our school buses into areas that may not be designed and maintained for larger vehicles. For instance, our aim is to stay on city streets that were built for heavier traffic by heavier vehicles, and will be plowed in a timely manner in the winter. We also do not want to use parking lots where turns may be tight and our buses are mixing with a large amount of personal vehicles. Based on the graphic, my thought is that we would use Bluff Creek Blvd. and have a bus stop established on that road for the 9.01ac building. However, in order to pick up students for the 3.45ac building, we will need to use the secondary road and parking lots, which concerns me. Therefore, I would like to request/recommend consideration to make the secondary access road on the south side of the 9.01ac building more substantial and possibly be considered a city street so that it can be maintained at the same level as Bluff Creek Blvd. I'd like to see it wide enough for large vehicles to pass each other safely, with a sidewalk on one or both sides, I hope this makes sense to you. I'd be happy to discuss this further with you if you're not clear from my descriptio. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to review this. Sincerely, John Thomas, Transportation Manager Eastern Carver County Schools 952-556-6161 From: Kahring, DeeDee Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 3:11 PM To: Thomas, John <ThomasJohn@District112.org>; Brecht, David <BrechtD@District112.org> Cc: Bauck, Jim <BauckJ@District112.org> Subject: FW: Agency Review Request - Avienda Residential, Commercial, Hotel & Office Concept Plan Development information for Lyman and Powers Blvd. follow instructions below DeeDee Kahring, SFO Director of Finance & Operations f onletpoint- �tEi'f�J/ October 10, 2016 City of Chanhassen Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 700 West Linden Avenue PO Box 1165 Minneapolis, MN 55440-1165 RE: Proposed Request for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District (A2) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) on 118 acres of land located at the SW corner of Powers and Lyman Boulevards. Dear Mrs. Aanenson: Concerning your request, CenterPoint Energy has no objection to the Rezoning. If you have any questions, please contact me at 612-321-5381. Respectfully, CENTERPOINT ENERGY Chuck Mayers Right -of -Way Specialist Engineering Services charles.mayers@centerpointenergy.com 612-321-5381 October 19, 2016 Kate Aanenson VIA Email: kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us City of Chanhassen PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Ms. Aanenson, I have reviewed project number 2016-25, known as the Avienda-Chan Retail Site. I am concerned that the project proposer has not accounted for the nearly 5.5 acres of wetland that exist on the site. These wetlands are regulated by the MN Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) under MN Rule 8420. My understanding is that this site includes a tributary watershed to both Lake Susan, an impaired water and Bluff Creek, an impaired watercourse. Wetlands are recognized as having important functions and values, including: stormwater retention, water quality treatment, wildlife habitat and others. The WCA purpose is to achieve a no net loss in the quantity, quality and biological diversity of Minnesota's wetlands. Although the WCA allows for replacement of these functions and values where avoidance is not feasible, it does not preclude the project from being reviewed for adequacy under the MN Rule 8420.0520 Sequencing. This rule says that a project must first demonstrate wetland avoidance alternatives and minimizes wetland impacts. Although the WCA does not regulate the rezoning of property the current plan as proposed, does not address the requirements as outlined in the state wetland rules. I encourage the applicant to meet early with the reviewing agencies as part of their planning process. Sincerely, Ben Meyer Wetland Specialist MN Board of Water and Soil Resources Cc. Terry Jeffery, City Aaron Finke, Carver SWCD Melissa Jenny, Corps of Engineers Ken Powell, BWSR Becky Horton, DNR Kristen Larson, Carver Co. Bemidji Brainerd Detroit Lakes Duluth Mankato Marshall New Ulm Rochester St. Cloud St. Paul St. Paul Office 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 Phone: (651) 296-3767 www.bwsr.state.mn.us TTY: (800) 627-3529 An equal opportunity employer The City of Chanhassen Citizen Survey ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS Four additional questions were asked by the City of Chanhassen as Meted below. The results for these questions are also available in the Report of Results. Question 16a: Policy Questlon 1 The City completed a retail market study that showed Chanhassen businesses successfully meet day -today shopping needs, and a regional mall along with the new Highway 212 in the City of Chanhassen would be viable and expand the retail opportunities in our city. The City Council would like to know the level to which you Neither agree or disagree with the Strongly Somewhat agree nor Somewhat Strongly following statements: agree agree disagree disagree disagree Total I would like a regional mail Medium built along the new Highway 212 29% 24% 16% 14% 17% 100% I would like the City to focus (multiple retail expansion in the support the downtown area and not along department the new Highway 212 21% 25% 24% 20% 10% 100% I would like to limit retail to the (specialty amount currently found in stores and Chanhassen and not build a of a regional regional mall 16% 13% 17% 25% 29% 100% specialty in terms of mall in Question 16b: Policy Question 2 What size mall, if at all, would you like to see developed in Chanhassen? (select only one) 10% 34% 22% 9% 25% 100% Summary Report 6 Medium Large I do not (two (multiple support the Small department department No development (specialty stores and stores and preference of a regional stores specialty specialty in terms of mall in only) stores) stores) scale Chanhassen Total What size mall, if at all, would you like to see developed in Chanhassen? (select only one) 10% 34% 22% 9% 25% 100% Summary Report 6 CHAN-212 TRADE AREA DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS AND SALES POTENTIAL Prepared for Carlston Commercial RE, LLC Prepared by McComb Group, Ltd. June 2014 0 Copyright 2014 McComb Group, Ltd. Chapter V1 SALES POTENTIAL AND SUPPORTABLE GLA The Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods trade areas have the potential to support more GLA than can be accommodated at the proposed development. This creates the enviable situation where the developer can choose from a wide variety of retail stores to establish its market position. Supportable GLA Estimated Chan -212 supportable GLA by retail store type is contained in Table 27. In almost every category, supportable space exceeds the median store size. These estimates of supportable square feet are likely to be understated due to the high trade area household income. Also, there are likely to be a large proportion of high income and high asset households where there are few constraints on discretionary spending. Table 27 CHAN-212 SHOPPING GOODS SUPPORTABLE GLA BY MERCHANDISE CATEGORY (Groes Leasable Area) 42 Store Size Merchandse Category 2015 2020 2025 Low Median High CONVENIENCE GOODS Food Stores Grocery Stores 94,087 113,202 135,261 31,676 52,500 65,888 Supermarkas 92,189 110,915 132,528 31,245 52,419 69,462 Convenience Food 2,913 3,507 4,190 1,349 2,085 5,323 Specialty Food Stores 7,650 9,2(15 11,000 1,188 2,400 6,000 Meat Markets 2,529 3,036 3,631 1,130 2,215 18,080 Baked Goods 524 632 756 1,191 1,834 3,285 Con$ctionery and Nut Stores 409 494 591 702 1,240 2,047 All Other Specialty Food Stores 1,095 1,315 1,570 1,069 2,200 8,007 Other Convenience Goods Drug & Proprietary Stores 20,480 24,643 29,443 8,280 11,700 23,714 Hardware 7,795 9,384 11,211 5,638 13,831 27,743 Liquor 19,819 23,845 28,491 1,305 2,856 7,210 Florist 2,879 3,463 4,137 766 1,600 5,396 Food/Health Supplement Stores 1,400 1,684 2,012 1200 1,234 1,968 Food Service Full -Service Restaurants 72,594 88,319 106,481 2,000 4,500 9,775 ].united Service Restaurants 41,438 50,415 60,783 1,335 3,000 3,400 Cafeterias 3,528 4,294 5,170 517 1,073 10,049 Snack & Beverage Places 14,733 17,927 21,613 850 1,500 2,495 Ice (ream & Soft Serve 1,702 2,071 2,492 902 1,148 1,570 Frozen Yogurt 275 340 405 1,031 1282 1,700 Doughnut Shops 3,518 4277 5,159 744 - 1,200 2,153 Bagel Shops 804 978 1,178 2,000 2,388 3,400 Coffee Shops 4,698 5,713 6,888 881 1,500 2,000 Cookie Shops 138 170 203 220 602 797 Other Snack Shops 2,456 2,986 3,600 850 1,578 2,495 Gaeoline Sva Stations/Caa¢ Gas/Convenience Food Stores 6,619 8,052 9,708 1,500 2,933 6,121 42 Table 27 (continued) CHAN-212 SHOPPING GOODS SUPPORTABLE GLA BY MERCHANDISE CATEGORY (Gross leasable Area) Merchandise Category SHOPPING GOODS General Merchandise Department Stores (Incl. lemeddepls.) Discount Stores Department Stores Other General Merchandise Stores Warehouse Clubs and Supercenters Dollar Stores Miscellaneous General Merchandise Apparel & Accessories Clothing Stores Mens and Boys Woomera; Clothing Children's & Infant Family Clothing Clothing Accessories Stores Other Clothing Stores Shoe Stores Men's Women's Children's & Infant Family Shoe Stores Athletic Footwear Furniture & Home Furnishings Furniture Floor Coverings Window Treatment Stores A8 Other Home Furnishings Stores Store Sae 2015 2020 2025 Low Median Huh 216,494 263,376 317,536 57,720 94,788 141,986 157,156 191,200 230,520 89,641 148,796 253,167 270,711 328,758 396,362 90,134 151,980 217,447 23,218 28,250 34,055 2,726 8,000 13,788 47,148 57,360 69,156 3,200 8,400 11,212 10,050 12,223 14,732 2,002 4,000 5,635 49,115 59,755 72,040 2,074 4200 8,740 18,929 23,029 27,767 1,490 3,912 6,000 87,835 106,862 M,835 2,374 8,000 28,728 4,659 5,666 6,831 918 1,400 2,001 13,902 16,909 20,389 1,060 2,300 8,234 921 1,117 1,348 903 1,640 2,186 1,759 2,137 2,574 1,309 2,384 3,158 424 514 621 1,490 3,912 6,000 28,063 34,143 41,166 2,021 3,388 10,734 11,931 14,514 17,491 1,535 32M 11,314 74,612 90,773 109,442 3,108 7,927 36,712 32,742 39,836 48,022 1,229 3,593 7,819 3,510 4,267 5,143 1,489 4,905 9,934 49,114 59,749 72,040 2,868 3,570 6,500 Electronics & Appliances Stores Household Appliance Stores 26,255 31,938 38,505 2,349 4,000 7,563 Radio, Tv& Electronics Stores 99,203 120,693 145,517 1,208 3,406 10,451 COMPuters, Software, Music,& Other Electronics 15,241 18,543 22,357 997 3,388 25,600 Other Shopping Good, Sporting Goods 81,035 98,585 118,860 2,238 7,500 44,116 General Line Sporting Goods 33,155 40,335 48,625 3,765 5,850 28,128 Specialty line Sporting Goods 42,564 51,787 62,431 1,097 2,449 4,356 Book Stores & Newsdealers 28,394 34,544 41,650 2,428 4,542 29,974 Stationery Stores and Office Supply 16,043 19,520 23,531 585 1,033 2,747 Musical Instrument & Supplies 11,254 13,696 16,513 2,432 7,324 26,094 Jewelry Stores 28,332 34,471 41,560 790 1,450 3,410 Hobby, Toy & Creme 25,257 30,726 37,051 1,604 4,050 25,861 Caret & Photographic Supply 6,695 8,149 9,822 816 2200 5,965 Gift, Novehy & Souvenirs 33,567 40,827 49,227 2,369 4,422 7,015 luggage&Ieather Goods 3,065 3,735 4,500 1,193 2,300 3,102 Sewing, Needlework & Piece Goods 23,330 28,390 34,210 2,678 12202 19,299 Pet Stores 22,100 26,885 32,420 1,847 3200 12,398 Art Dealers 3,276 3,982 4,800 675 1,434 2,401 Optical Goods Stores 12,703 15,452 18,631 885 1,561 4,068 Pre -Recorded Tapes, Compact Discs 3,048 3,709 4,470 1,308 3,426 12,753 Cosmetics, Beauty Supplies & Perfume 9,409 11,447 13,800 1,102 1,953 6,235 Ah Other Health &personal Care 18,753 22,811 27,505 697 1,786 3,084 43 fable 27 (continued) CE AN -212 SHOPPLNG GOODS SUPPORTABLE GIA BYMFRCHAND$ECATEGORY (Gross Losable Are,) Merchandise Category 2015 2020 2025 Low Store Sia Median High h OTHER RETAIL STORES 1,373 773 1,200 1,807 1,320 747 Building Materials & Garden Supplies 1,223 1,856 3,130 2,509 1,417 1,691 Building Materials & Supplies Stores 1,488 4,128 4,367 9,880 11,807 1,038 Hone Centers 91,060 110,786 133,566 8,981 95,173 135,833 Paint, Glass & Wallpaper 9,564 11,636 14,031 2,348 3533 5,028 lawn & Carden Equipment 11,151 13,329 1,346 2,122 2,701 3,387 Outdoor Power Equipment 25,590 31,140 37,540 N/A N/A N/A Retail Nurseries, Lawn & Carden 72,890 88,680 106,920 N/A 15,000 N/A Molar Vehicles & Parts Dealers 1,600 3,480 67,750 76,725 91,663 1,433 Auto Parts & Accessories Stores 25,010 30,425 36,68.5 2,232 6,500 13,000 Tue Dealers 18,900 22,995 27,725 3,514 6,944 12,014 SERVICES Personal Care Services Beauty Shops Nail Salons Diet & Weight Reducing Services Other Personal Care Services Drycleaning & Laundry Services Lhycleaning & Laundry Services (except coin -op.) Other Personal Services Ch Od Day Care Services Photographic Studios Veterinarian Services Pet Care Rental and Leasing Fornalwearand Costume Rental Home Health Equipment Rental Recreation Physical Fitness Facilites Health Care Offices of Physicians Offices of Physicians Offices of Dentists Offices of Chiropractors Offices of Optometrists Offices of Mental Health practitioners Physical & Occupational Therapists Source: McComb (),cap, Ltd 16,084 9,111 10,879 900 1,400 3,480 2,027 1,145 1,373 773 1,200 1,807 1,320 747 893 1,223 1,856 3,130 2,509 1,417 1,691 703 1,488 4,128 4,367 9,880 11,807 1,038 1,608 2,731 14,750 16,710 19,960 3,059 5,050 7,495 2,156 2,440 2,916 990 1,866 2,550 9,849 11,151 13,329 1,346 2,122 2,701 3,387 3,827 4,560 900 1,200 1,500 482 729 871 763 1,046 1,773 1,664 2,516 3,008 1(10 1,600 3,480 67,750 76,725 91,663 1,433 6,448 32,170 69,703 83,863 100,202 969 1,652 4,008 32,197 19,368 23,145 1,090 1,700 3,970 4,649 2,797 3,342 1,090 1,600 3,970 1,764 3,183 3,805 1,074 1,620 4,347 2,391 4,316 5,157 1,090 1,800 3,970 4,006 7,232 8,641 1,090 1,600 3,970 Shopping Center Size Sales potential and supportable square feet provide an indication of shopping center potential. Shopping center size will depend on tenant interest and the number of anchor stores. The potential GLA by store category ranges from 825,000 square feet to 1,120,000 square feet, as shown in Table 28. Convenience goods ranges from 105,000 square feet to 135,000 square feet depending on supermarket size and number of other retailers. Convenience goods includes stores where 44 convenience is a primary consideration as they are visited on a regular basis. Examples include supermarkets, drug, liquor, hardware, afld other stores and services. Table 28 CHAN-212 POTFNTTALGROSS LF.ASABLEAREA Destination Stores Health Club Goss Leasable Area Store Category Low High Convenience Goods 105,000 135,000 Shopping Goods Subtotal 215,000 Anchor Stores 120,000 220,000 Junior Anchors 220,000 315,000 Inline Stores 110,000 1_ 8� Subtotal 450,000 715,000 Food Service Restaurants 20,000 30,000 Fast Food 15,000 20,000 Subtotal 35,000 50,000 Services 20,000 30,000 Destination Stores Health Club 50,000 60,000 Home Center 115,000 115,000 Cinema 50,000 60,000 Subtotal 215,000 235,000 Total 825,000 1,165,000 Sowce: McComb (croup, Ltd Shopping goods retailers are stores where comparison shopping is a common part of the shopping trip. Department stores typically anchor these shopping centers. Potential anchor store GLA ranges from 120,000 square feet to 220,000 square feet. Junior anchor retailers are various size stores, ranging in size from 10,000 square feet to 50,000 square feet, also adding the center's dralving power. Junior anchor GLA could range from 220,000 square feet to 315,000 square feet. Inlirle, small store tenants could range from 110,000 square feet to 180,000 square feet. Total shopping goods stores could range from 450,000 square feet to 715,000 square feet. Food service establishments are expected to range from 35,000 square feet to 50,000 square feet. Services of various types could range from 20,000 square feet to 30,000 square feet. Destination retailers like health clubs, home centers, and cinemas, could total 215,000 square feet to 235,000 square feet if all three located at Chan -212. It is possible that not all the anticipated potential tenants will located at Chan -212 indicating that the shopping center is likely to be between 800,000 square feet and 1,000,000 square feet. 45 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly swom, on oath deposes that she is and was on October 20, 2016, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Concept Planned Use Development for a regional destination, lifestyle and mixed use center (Avienda) on five parcels totaling 118 acres on property zoned Agricultural Estate District (A-2) with a land use designation of Regional Commercial or Office use, and located at the southwest corner of Lyman and Powers Boulevards, Planning Case 2016-25 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this c1_D day of () (--IDWA- -12016. du —Votary Public JPElrNoptNa,IFEANP toT R ry Public Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date &Time Tuesday, November 11, at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start Until later in the avenin depending on the order of thea ends Location. City Hall Council Chambers. 7700 Market Riva Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date &Time: I U1=Y November 11, at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start �__ until later in the evening depending on the order of the aqenda. Request for Concept Planned Use Development for a regional destination, lifestyle and mixed use center (Avienda) on five Proposal: parcels totaling 118 acres on property zoned Agricultural Estate District (A-2) with a land use designation of Regional Commercial or Office use. Applicant: Applicant: Landform Professional Services LLC. Owner: Level 7 Development. Property Southwest corner of Lyman and Powers Boulevards. Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the ro'ect. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-25. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Kate Aanenson by Questions & email at kaanenson(dci.chanhassen mn us or by phone at Comments: 952-227-1139. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Plannin Commission meetin . NEWT Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, Pminutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! Clly Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses. Weiland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a Public hearing before Me Nanning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application In witting. My Interested party Is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application Mat includes all pertinent infomatlon and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, also will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for Me public to speak about one proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will dose the public hearing and discuss the Item and make a recommendation to he City Courwil. The City Council my reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Canmieaion's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and coda amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercialAndustdel. • Minnesota State statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Soma applications due to their canplezlty may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check with Me Planning Deperbnent regarding Its status and schedull g for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/ropresentaove is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarcling their proposal. Staff is also available to review the pmject with any Interested person(s). • Because Me Planning Cornmission holds the public hearing, the City Council does rout. Minutes em taken and any, correspondence regarding the appticaeon wlll be Intludatl In the report to the City Council. o you wish to have something to be included In Me report, lease amled the Pm mingStall ereon named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date &Time: I U1=Y November 11, at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start �__ until later in the evening depending on the order of the aqenda. Name AARON LEIGH SANDNESS iaxpayerHaaress TaxpayerCity-State-Zip ADAM J CARVER 9171 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4758 AIEKSANDR 5 SIMANOVICH 1447 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 4749 ANDREW KIM 1482 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4811 ANDREW LASKA 9070 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 ANNIE T DANIELSON 9291 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4745 ANTHONY S LARSON 9130 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4780 ARAVIND PUTTA 9180 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4780 REV INTERVIVOS TRUST 1505 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4812 SYED 1485 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4811 1561 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9403 EFAMILYRMS LLC E 19450 281STST BELLE PLAINE, MN 56011-5010 1495 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4811 KONDA 1471 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4750 BRADLEY SKEEL 1452 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4811 BRADLEY WESTVIG 1430 JERSEY WAY CHANHASSE MN 55317-8622 BRANDON B MEHDIZADEH 1511 DEGLER CIR „ CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4808 BRANDON E BUSSLER 1451 HENRY CT CHANHASSE , MN 55317-2200 BRANDON ZENK 9091 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4845 BRENT R & KATHLEEN A MILLER 1200 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9168 BRIAN DUNN 1421 HENRY CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2200 BRIAN HELTEMES 1502 CAMDEN RIDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2303 BRUCE V MUNDAHL 9445 RIVER ROCK DR S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 BRYAN T PETERSEN 9180 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4758 CAMDEN RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN 1801 AMERICAN BLVD E STE 21 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425-1230 CAROLYN HARBERT 9492 RIVER ROCK DR S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 CARVER COUNTY 602 4TH ST E CHASKA, MN155318-2102 CHAD & JAN GNIFFKE 1419 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 CHAD ENGEL 9050 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 CHAD LINDELL 9330 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4746 CHRISTIAN L SCHENK 1300 OAKSIDE CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9005 CHRISTOPHER PRICCO 9441 RIVER ROCK DR S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 - CHRISTOPHER R ANDERSON 1423 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 CLINTALLEN BITTING 1531 CAMDEN RIDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2303 COREY MASLOWSKI CRAIG J PETERSON 1460 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-6749 CRAIG P PABICH E CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317.005 CURTIS L CLEMENTS 91161 61 RIVER R RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4758 DALLAS JOHN FRASER 1480 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 4749 DAMIAN L NOLD 9170 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4780 DANIEL A O'CONNELL 9100 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4780 DANIEL GOLDMAN 9071 DELGER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 DANIEL J DEYOUNG 1511 CAMDEN RIDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2303 DAVID K LAWSON 9220 ELLENDALE LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4747 DAVID L VEGA 9060 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 DAVID T & JENNIFER R PERRY 1480 PEMBROKE PASS CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4756 DEGLER LAND COMPANY LLC 9250 ELLENDALE LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4747 DEREK M & JENNIFER L PAULING 541 PINEVIEW CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8697 DONALD E VASATKA III 9260 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- DOUGLAS D SUMNER 9120 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4780 DUNN FAMILY TRUST 9140 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4780 EBENEZER & SUSANNA PETERS 1411 HENRY CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2200 ELIZABETH WILLIAMS 9280 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4745 ERIC HOUSELOG 9421 RIVER ROCK DR S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- ERIC L & JENNIFER L SWANSON 1501 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4750 ERIK DALE 1440 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 ERIK JOHNSON 1190 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9166 EVAN M LUCORE 9081 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 GEORGE MURRAY 1440 JERSEY WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 553174622 GUNJAN SHARMA 1430 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 HAROLD STANDLEY 1470 JERSEY WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8622 HUONG N DANG 1630 JEURISSEN LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4842 IAN GLENN 9151 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4758 I-PERI TSU 1532 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN -4812 55317 ILHAM LLC 9210 ELLENDALE LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4747 NAN ATANASOV 9301 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4746 IACOB A WILLS 9102 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4758 IAMES C EBELING 9021 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 9160 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- SMALONE9452 RIVER ROCK DR S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 S 5ROHWER F 9111 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4758 A & SUSAN E ANDERSSON 9260 ELLENDALE LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 - JASON P CUSICK 9439 RIVER ROCK DR S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 JEFFREY BAHR 1490 PEMBROKE PASS CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4756 JEFFREY BUCKLEY 1522 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4812 JEFFREY S & KATHERINE B JACOBS 9429 RIVER ROCK DR S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 JEFFREY S & LEE ANN FRANZ 8950 SUNSET TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9100 JERALD D STIELE 1492 CAMDEN RIDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 - JESSICA E GALVIN 1451 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 JOAN M MCNANEY 1455 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4811 JOHN C PETERSON 1459 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 JOHN CHARLES COOPER 9500 RIVER ROCK DR 5 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2305 JOHN D WINTERS 1490 JERSEY WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8622 JOHN P BYLSMA 9110 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4780 JOHN R SAUER 9090 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 JON 1 VARNER 9300 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4746 JON R RATHBUN 1500 PEMBROKE PASS CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4748 JONATHAN M GILBERT 1641 JEURISSEN LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4842 JONATHAN R & SHANNON G ABAD 1439 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 JOSEPH A BRANDT 1515 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4812 JOSEPH ALTHAUS 1610 JEURISSEN LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4842 JOSEPH ARMSTRONG 1427 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 JOSHUA P CARLSON 9091 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 JUSTIN KYLE HANSEN 9417 RIVER ROCK DR S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 KAMINI RAMARAJ 1491 PEMBROKE PASS CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4756 KARIN RENAE O'HARA 1431 HENRY CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2200 KATHERINE PEYTON 1501 CAMDEN RIDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2303 KATHERINE RUCKER 9488 RIVER ROCK DR S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 KEITH M & KAREN S WHITACRE 1431 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 KELLY HANSON 1441 HENRY CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2200 KELLY WANG 9270 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4745 KENT B & LORI BETH WARNBERG 1111 LYMAN CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8535 KEVIN E VETSCH & DANA M VETSCH REV TRUST 9310 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4746 KEVIN K O'NEILL KIRK WALTON 1470 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 KLAYAN MAVULfTf 1491 DEGLER OR _ CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 4750 KRAIG R STABENOW 1460 JERSEY WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8622 KURT D EGERT50N 1465 MILLS CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 - LCR HOLDINGS LLC 9444 RIVER ROCK RO CK DRS CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT LLC 14191113TH ST LITTLE FALLS, MN 56345-6352 LEVENT COLAK 4600 KINGS POINT RD MINNETRISTA, MN 55331-9628 LOREN J & SANDRA M DENNIN 1475 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4811 MANDEEP S VIRK 1521 PEMBROKE PASS CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 - MARC GILLITZER 9190 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4758 MARCO RASGATTINO 1461 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4750 MAREN F GRIER 9141 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4758 MARK E & MOLLY K WILSON 9150 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4780 MARK HERZOG 1443 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 MARK RAICHE 9271 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4745 MARK T KLUNDER 9448 RIVER ROCK DR S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 MATTHEW WANGERIN 9240 ELLENDALE LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 - MAX 1AHRAUS 9080 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 MICHAEL D TIMM 9311 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4746 MINH CAM TRAN 1101 LYMAN CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8535 NATHAN C & TERESA M PETERSON 1330 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9168 NATHAN STIER 1520 PEMBROKE PASS CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4748 NICK HEINZE 9200 ELLENDALE LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4747 NILESH C SUTHAR 1491 CAMDEN RIDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2302 ONESIMO ALEMAN 9031 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 PATRICK T MACY 1480JERSEY WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8622 PETER G JONSWOLD 1472 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4811 PRAMOD PUTTA 9101 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4780 PRESERVE BLF CRK HOMEOWNERS 1502 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4812 RACHELLE ROSEMARIE PAIGE BERGQUIST 4672 SLATER EAGAN, MN 55122-2362 RENATA BEAMAN REV INTERVIVOS TRUST 1461 HENRY CT T CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2200 RO_LF LEE DIXON 9320 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4746 RONALD W & CAROL M ENTINGER 1620JEURISSEN LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4842 8851 AUDUBON RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9407 ROSS MARTIN ROY K COOPER II SANDRA SCHMITT BAKER & STUART B BAKER RE SANTOSH KUMAR RAJURI SCOTT BERRY SEAN J FLAHERTY SHAUN ADAMS SIJO JOSEPH STEPHEN J & LYN A MACHACEK STEVEN C WIGNESS STEVEN J HEIMERMANN SUDEEP & ARCHANA POMAR SUDHAKARJAGARKAL SUMAN K THAPA TERI MALECHA THE PRESERVE AT BLUFF CREEK HOMEOWNERS A THE PRESERVE AT BLUFF CREEK HOMEOWNERS A THORIR THORISSON TIMOTHY C BOYCE TIRTHA RAJ KHAREL TRACY & SANDY REMINGTON TUOI VAN TRAN U S HOME CORP (DBA/LENNAR) VARUN PARVATANENI VENKATA LOGISETTI WENDY M GALL WILLIAM FUESZ WILLIAM J & VICKY L GOERS WILLIAM W CRAWFORD ZHEXIN ZHANG SARA K MAV_ES REV INTERVIVOS TRUST JEFF RlNGBLOM MIKE FLESCH 9281 RIVER ROCK DR N 1492 MILLS DR 8955 SUNSET TRL 9061 DEGLER CIR 1511 PEMBROKE PASS 1512 MILLS DR 9290 RIVER ROCK DR N 9230 ELLENDALE LN 1510 PEMBROKE PASS 1651JEURISSEN LN 1501 PEMBROKE PASS 1481 DEGLER CIR 9101 RIVER ROCK DR N 1462 MILLS DR 9041 DEGLER CIR 971 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY ST 7300 METRO BLVD STE 300 143S•BETHESDA CIR 8941 AUDUBON RD 9425 RIVER ROCK DR S 1531 PEMBROKE PASS 8900 SUNSET TRL 16305 36TH AVE N STE 600 9131 RIVER ROCK DR N 9051 DEGLER CIR 1445 MILLS DR 1450 BETHESDA CIR 1601 LYMAN BLVD 9451 RIVER ROCK DR S 1455 BETHESDA CIR 1455 HEMLOCK WAY 1788 MARIGOLD CT _ 1694 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4745 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4811 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9126 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4748 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4812 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4745 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4747 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4748 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4842 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4748 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4750 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4758 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4811 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 SAINT PAUL, MN 55118-2856 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55439- CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8412 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4748 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9100 PLYMOUTH, MN 55446-4270 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4758 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4811 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9402 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4544 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4550 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4516 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ST PAUL DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS N 180 FIFTH STREET EAST, SUITE 700 ST. PAUL, MN 55101-1678 OFFICIAL BUSINESS LL 5s� � ' ti gEHEY BOWFS 02 1A $ 00.460 0004627551 APR28 2017 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 55101 RECEIVED MAY 0 3 2017 CITY OF CHANHASSEN �® DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ST. PAUL DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 180 FIFTH STREET EAST, SUITE 700 REFRY ro ArrENnoN OF ST. PAUL, MN 55101-1678 REGULATORY BRANCH APR 2 6 2017 Regulatory File No. MVP-2017-00998-JTB City of Chanhassen c/o Kate Aanenson 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Ms. Aanenson: We have received the document entitled "AUAR for The City of Chanhassen" dated March 27, 2017, regarding the review of hypothetical development scenarios. The purpose of this letter is to inform you that based on available information a Department of the Army (DA) permit may be required for your proposed activity. This letter also provides general information regarding the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) regulatory program. If the proposal involves activity in navigable waters of the United States, it may be subject to the Corps of Engineers' jurisdiction under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (Section 10). Section 10 prohibits the construction, excavation, or deposition of materials in, over, or under navigable waters of the United States, or any work that would affect the course, location, condition, or capacity of those waters, unless the work has been authorized by a Department of the Army permit. If the proposal involves discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, it may be subject to the Corps of Engineers' jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA Section 404). Waters of the United States include navigable waters, their tributaries, and adjacent wetlands (33 CFR § 328.3). CWA Section 301(a) prohibits discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, unless the work has been authorized by a Department of the Army permit under Section 404. Information about the Corps permitting process can be obtained online at http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/regulatory. The Corps evaluation of a Section 10 and/or a Section 404 permit application involves multiple analyses, including (1) evaluating the proposal's impacts in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (33 CFR part 325), (2) determining whether the proposal is contrary to the public interest (33 CFR § 320.4), and (3) in the case of a Section 404 permit, determining whether the proposal complies with the Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines (Guidelines) (40 CFR part 230). If the proposal requires a Section 404 permit application, the Guidelines specifically require that "no discharge of dredged or fill material shall be permitted if there is a practicable alternative to the proposed discharge which would have less adverse impact on the aquatic ecosystem, so long as the alternative does not have other significant adverse environmental consequences" (40 CFR § 230.10(a)). Time and money spent on the proposal prior to applying for a Section 404 permit cannot be factored into the Corps' decision whether there is a less damaging practicable alternative to the proposal. Regulatory Branch (File No. MVP-2017-00998-JTB) If an application for a Corps permit has not yet been submitted, the project proposer may request a pre -application consultation meeting with the Corps to obtain information regarding the data, studies or other information that will be necessary for the permit evaluation process. A pre -application consultation meeting is strongly recommended if the proposal has substantial impacts to waters of the United States, or if it is a large or controversial project. If you have any questions, please contact Justin Berndt in our St. Paul office by phone at (651) 290-5446 or by email at Justin.T.Berndt@usace.army.mil. In any correspondence or inquiries, please refer to the Regulatory file number shown above. Sincerely, Kristen Hafer Southwest Section Chief Page 2 of 2 7700MuwBl gatitud PO Bat 141 ChmiIMM MN 55317 Administration F4tora. 95zW.1100 Fax 952227.1110 Building Inspections Pharr 952227.1180 Fare 952227.1190 Engineering Phare 952.227.1160 Fax 952227.1170 Anatata Phony 9522271140 Fee 952 .M10 Part 8 Recreation Ruane: 952227.1120 Fax 9W -X7.1110 MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Geitank City Matrager FROM: Kate Aaaenson, AICP, Commlmity Development Director DATE: April 13. ?01 i exvl:�' SUBJ. Discuss Vis 07!i Process for the Lifestyle Center L ISieV� l h6 As a part of the concephtal review of the Level 7 Development plan on March 9, 2015, the City Council directed staff to work on developing a Visioning Study for the Lifestyle Center property. Staff has consulted with SRF Consulting Croup, bm to Prepare a Professional Services Agreement As outlined by Berry Wawa in the attached proposal, the visioning process is intended to inform the electod and appointed officials along with the city stat of the values and priorities presented to the various stakeholders. The focus of the study wr71 on the following: • Composition of development uses • Chrulation including vehicles, pedestrians and bicycles • Edge treatment and landscaping • Programmable Civic area and ameoifis • Development character, scale and aeeArebm antir 231 °nBOANIard Mr. Wawa has outlined the suggested 3.4 month process andthe stakeholder Raw. M2-227.1400 meetings. A web -based survey will also be a component of the visioning process. Fax 952227.1404 His proposal includes a budget of $30,000. ria ft � Mr. Warner will be at the work session to mower any questions that the Council may Pfrme 9522271130 have regarding the proposal- Staff recommends placing the Professional Saviors Fax 952227.1110 Agreement on the next City Council agenda for approval. Fltbll; Wnrk, ATTACEMIENTS 7901 Park ptara Phone; 952227.1300 1. SRF Consulting Gro Inc. Visioning Fax 952227.1370 h°8 uP, Study Proposal dated Match 30, 2015. Senior Center g.'�ian�aoispt�ma�zals-os rtbtytecmr�vmm poco'ec umk, 4.73 ftw 9522271125 Fax 952.717.1110 Website �% �'L G� J�Qt�ov 04 wwvr cl.chanhassemmn.us 0 �wIk �N( vioflCS�SSibh - U Chanhassen is a 6"innuniiy tv Lug - Prwdin�tor Today and Plan rcng lof Tomorrow LJ,iI I ENelne[IIs P I A N N F S S D F, IGNFf5 ConsuMing Grwp, Inc. March 30, 2015 DRAFT For REVIEW �j"'l f fl I,6 Kate Asaemson, AICD V Community Development Director CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Marled Boulevard PO Boz 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR A VISIONING STUDY Based on your request, we are pleased to submit this proposal to provide professional services for conducting a visioning study in association with the Quadrant and the adjacent parcels. For purposes of this later, the "Quadrant" will refer to the contiguous 118 arms currently owned by several private parties. Study Background and Intent A 118 acre tract of undeveloped land is located in the City of Chanhassen near Lyman and Powers Boulevards near TH 212. The area is owned by several private parties with development designated for mixed land uses including a retail center. Although general land use designations have been suggested, felmal approvals for development have not been obtained from the City of Chanhassen. The visioning exercise and outcome is intended to inform elected policy makers and appointed officials along with city staff as to the values and priorities presented by the diverse stakeholder groups who have interest in future development of the Quadrant. Visioning for the purpose of this exercise, is intended to focus upon several topica to include; • Composition of development uses • Circulation including vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle • Open space functions • Edge treatments and landscaping • Programmable civic areas and amenities • Development character, scale and aesthetica Input garnered from the various interested parties will be used to mfoun the Quadrant and related development projects during their municipal approvals. Approach Meamingful factiiitation of the representative stakeholder groups will be paramount to achieve the study intent To that end, meetings or other means will occur with individual groups to seek ioput from those individuals who have shown interest or are thought to present valuable perspectives for the proposed development www.srfconsulting.com Om CarbOFI Pm k"y NOM Sabo Iso 1 h rdmpolr, wl SSW -"O I 7UA7s M FM MVSJ4b M ="r Opm Wxft E•rbry 2- Marnd 30, 2015 Each of the meetings, work sessions or active surveys will employ precedent project images that Portray alternative approacixs to related project dements. This technique will allow participants to re and contrast how varying built projects responded to similar project elements. Participants will be asked to provide prefi&cnce or priority for the images, and when possible, to provide subjective comments as to suggested changes or improvements 9rat may benefit the Chanhassen application. Identified stakeholder groups and thea engagement follow; Current development parcel property ommrsone to two facilitated meetings dependent upon thea willingness to participate together Adjacent neighborhood -one facilitated meeting, likely to be held late afternoon or early evening Comnuarity at large -web based survey (see below) Cbmeber of CommawDowntown Chwj" ssen Business Commwdty-one facilitated meeting, lfiCdy to be held early morning consistent with business owner availability EMded/Appohaed OffwW&-" facilitated meeting, likely a joint work session of the City Council and the Planning Commission Web based survey -A web based survey such as Mind Maer or Survey Monkey would be made available to solicit input from interested parties for a defined period of about 4 weal®. Participant input wound be monitored and recorded. Study End Product Stakeholder input received hum the various facilitated meetings along with the web based sampling will be summarized in a concise report and made available to the city for use by ARM the City Council and Planning Commission ASSUMPTIONS Base mapping and concepts plans for parcel development will be provided by the city and will be used for any necessary mappin& Work sessions with staff will be the primary source of input to guide decision making SCHEDULE We will complete this work within a mutually agreod-upon time schedule. Upon a formal notice to proceed, work would commence with a staff work sessiontkick off meeting. It is assumed that baseline work teaks would occur in April, followed by primary stakeholder group input during May and early June. A summary document would be made available in late June or early July. -3 _ March 30, 2015 BASIS OF PAYM]M/BUDGET We propose to be reimbursed for our services on an hourly basis for the actual time expended. Direct project expenses, such as printing, supplies, reproduction, etc., will be billed at coat, and mileage will be billed at the anent allowable IRS rate for business miles. Invoices are submitted on a monthly basis for work performed dining the previous month. Payment is due within 30 days. Based on our understanding of the project and our scope of services, we estimate the rot -t> a=cecd cost of our services to be $30,000, which includes both time and expenaea. The exact allocation of related eonmItant stafftime toward specific work tasks and stakeholder meetings will be arrived upon in joint discussions between city staff and the Consultant project manager. CHANGES IN THE SCOPE OF SERVICES It is understood that if the scope or extent of work changes, the cost will be adjusted aeoordingly. Before any out -of -scope work is initiated, however, we will submit a budget request for the new work and will not begin work until we receive authorization from yon. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS The attached Standard Tams and Conditions (Attachment A) together with this proposal for professional services constitute the entire agreement between the Client and SRP Consulting Group, Inc. and supersede all prior written or oral rmderslandings. This agreement may only be amended, supplemented, modified or canceled by a duly executed written instrument. NOTICE TO PROCEED A signed copy of this proposal or a separate letter of Authorization, either mailed or emailed to our office, will stave as olur notice to proceed. The email address is bwarner@srfoDnsu1tin&ooffL 4- March 30, 2015 We sincerely appreciate your consideration of this proposal and look forward to working with you on this project. Please feel free to mntad us if you have any questions or need additional knformation. Sincerely, SRF CoNsuumj GROUP, INC. Barry J. Warner, FASLA AICP Senior Vice President APPROVED: Com) ..................... Name Title Date 7Xiv cog proposal is ralid for a period of 90 ft& SRP reserves Bre r4k to 441W its cost est4eah 4kr 90 daysfton the date of this pnopmai SRF PPmposal numbers issued by marketing f r» AITACEMOV7 A 'StAI DARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS ib!ladsd7tim adCrtN4m �t vimts traYd 1lsporl6 Froidoed Nslem amltlhtlms etba Atteeoem bet,® d cLzNf d mF C=dbs Clasp, Inc. r1Rn avd.pasaaa IN poo holm or CA mdaa6mdrp. ibda A9emem aryaoybe ammdK g4lamonlK=4&4 orsadindby a duly amatadwdeainslimmat. yVila s;;a• a isas- IltmedatomsbadbyIRF under tisApametwill bsAnetaandAM ada iymadbymamboaMrspsnissimpssmtiehamdtdat0arakaomumaattoaurahsandiatoaloalhy. MFalasIDwanr4 aaptaedahpdAUAW ma Apmem094NabatsiaeLma®ofim wi&®tP'a arhia. b. 7b CLMf Y be rgandHe nor, sod SRF may dp WM dr socmoy od madelms of at a4saemml4 PPoasu>K hlkodfaot ni dow, and a6sr indhnnotian gaud by CLMW b IRF pmamt b t" EU may m ocb mQo4mokabat 4164aodidma6minpa�glv15oititaaioanodrteaAgeemmt AR drbes std egnod des uaaI I place to ria Apeemmt will be fa the sols aid easlod bsagt aftlr ClJX)U and SRF and ail tot 9s bmit ofony oar pry_ Nodes eaelemed to oris Agaeemet doll mate a aomsad rte$ ib or a amm efaedmin *m of a mhd patyspfwt siw non CLMN m SRF. mrs st.idaodtt k Aroma K o 6s/ Fdt!®dd achy 4a ms CL.lXit!'s bem& mem mot r/iy still bwe say did sport =F bel aft m Agranart or the pe600aem of dsslh6s betem 4 baloior hall be pnpwd m slaters w� IRF'a almdtd iooldm pasgaa add wiII a sslasflld b ms (I�Nf b9 SRF arxid1y, veer adtadm sgsesd. Imtaior a dm and pyahis hri1idd1W QA 46ps dsmlpt ails clZm W b vda sq palls da IitP tr athior drgsrr widiot It dl's (as) days s� adept ei>NF'aianda thtaast, the ss>oran da IISF wilbebosomed 9toaft di-Irl%pamaih(m*Aadmumgift afidtaopsrodsodbylaw, ifIN4 baddific4 Fany, odor Shap moan dip weir notice b to CIM1T, rapaod arhts mer this Amemet atR 9RF br baa pod is din of mu ate daastlda,aapmegssdadtdteddwqpL Any Iii of eoar pnpsetl by SRP npsamia joamt a a dirt poal mord and on meiahsd nor do land Iidome at to CLffit[. Nam OF hr m aortal aha the mot at ilhr, muds, adapt aaadilieq or bMft {TRP da sot penme nor momoydsh alt opium as ompe I10 ort.arr w"horbtdsor ami aottofft CL=T. NtF wID aleilmeame aaatsgs 1tr Wades' Cmpmaia4 Cimerl Iaats7ly, Aabmoh'L LiahNy and Prairfaanl linbffiq andhall porde sr4Astr dio®m bile CI.ffii7 rpmaa9aatt 6. T.N�DFMN:FIC:ATION AND ALLOCATION OF RISK 7b the fAM add pmiimd by low, SRF epees b bdondW ad old bam6ar the C7.i@IF. mer oAem Aa*= and s�ioyat spill d dmgt, lidbititit t oast (ods3aR rermbb tbmys' 1ba sod dies goals) tithe 1411 aloe by SRFs mpltpRmb soft Ods Apaaoawtswdtbl ds stomedlaY or rpme 6rNip a hpiyb0s. b 7b the Iblal eland pem and by law. is CLIENT ogmr to bdm* std hold drier IRF, 6* anise, dlaebt ad a�iayer ogling d d atm, isblitia aroma oomdalydnsoolbls aposys' i nmol dnise mos) bas est ad by do CLI NT's under mor aadmid Ayaaat sod mat diY tLemiYa r a6aa 1hr helm me CLlf T is lag ly tiads. 7. TERMINATION OFAiiREEIVIENI' 8, �t paty » t ao' 4a. Rm aha fps Pear w11 ndim to me dada pactq lu=mb mid Apasmlt Upondoh t®&R 4d CLMff da payb SRPOD aaooa ss aaiq b W andr to ApamsDLnor sL wahFaied 1p b tie amotlhe deft aftEsib" Al doeaaat peapawd a dmlbadby IRF pmat b bis AgnamMabwtm+afw.ia, and NW "E las en anoaabip a odpapwyioiwmtft-- Rams dsoysoeh I meetsbymeCXJWr NaIbtCIXRNra sdstmdme CLMNT pmto Plip 1 In MWWWd»vmadOmliad Ra: Aapa147a11 WMMJ� , and hdd SRF bamia11 Ilam all dome, dacsges, and arpatmea ed3dn demail+s M aeriof Od Of tooE meme of dammrbbymeaMMatbyO11 sattg11ua 0 fieCLMPrr. S. fSF.OF '-EaRONI MEU A 1. dWmbydlatLMTfewe1®iEadlode ymdada+laWoukown5adcapelflat p sigaadw eked byW, Malin eietll>de gae�a e�.f atte4 dace, pgfia►, ar ¢eda typaa frn ate Eby tIRF b me CLMU oft ady far scenaneer of On C LIOT Any amah>im Q isdmadm MAamed a 660101 f,an $0013 demmmAkawill be11f mWeade-udc b. Whm mtoefixitii doeessab m docbanio media fiam, OF awlow wo sgise11tlsa IS b lmgh® Omp6bw, awtaltty. at aSaMAW of doemfeas d *= *a im daOR111n t�pliesfiaa peat�R9e. dPeetie6 9�+ oc °®F� hadwste d1ltiop 8mthee tta5dby SRF 1191 be�l11gd0da Ataoppmsha c If*Win tdiecaopmcyiegio 4ed�AsapbBea�edlhehadaopaY,dsmatdeadeeefovem eaANMmsdmof f,� 4ta's aaasloS fn Fera taed4iy eirmmie 110 ttew fa11 n.eUter at J. dtaes tsimia shnr (60) 60% 16N vb* Ge madam pity d" be dseeed b bas accepted & dam fsw I A" mal deACW be seWOM day alempik we pidod wM be cep mailed by to pally ddsYe>naeta desheoie fm Rt!"note "Vensible n ssYado®s11bsmadildeeimaiasassW Ramet of rcepisaee by&e CLMT SRP absll not be Ysbie la'r®Eoaa a 4awaye ice b irhae a deiaf,m emde� eery eetvice ea6ed far sa>esr dfi Atpeemml msdbaq ft® s[ycame brymd f)QP's amiamabie oeghol �.r Ncdbw pet abf neap IS bra, meassIeh a otelystieos medr ism ANeemant Vt%Mt de eeI tsafma ceawwt Offs adze Poly. I2- HINDINOLFFECT Ttie AReaen t ahati bbd, and h behe*ae dared shall ire b do mope* V podia b11ab% %* 1121 npaedbYea, emalm. _admb imYm, mrat ad asiyas. Amy taovriaeisapmOfAiu�AId4tbeTaidaeoottaast$siftSWIM a IW todeemadshiMIM■d p an n,nM" wi&m ebb oo - b be tubi ami blodbt Wm ft Cl UNT and ®; Ills OW 1111 ft AiP'e®wt bdl_;e miamid b saa6.emifa lsalliae a psR 16�gf wih a agd and epbmathia po vid*mlt 9sa4e a Otte. Pommel" eapehey f: iaie11imditc 11wahet pcod11aa Nreobsaemmt KatgPewsiiah tix iSrt pt11y obeli nottataate a wdvw Of Poetpwaii11� mt tbaIIataf6of 161 edm4aabraa dfe11 pwriiW ar dfss:tsssdr dpdeA�aamsn< 14. �l'R�'IVAL All Pm Ilepns of fA ARearwet eepgdltfl Opaaw til d Dromsds sod RNO of Desmiaee. MoMme a Meir MR141M bdemff s and ARarfm4tFAmkladI poieRasdaift160 sdwmineffect 13, DISPG I'E RESOLUTION i[medpiatim ht pod Clefs dila b wdM a dYpa! *seen ds bio p� deye dstllm orf■ iipahl•r tmpsiad spae6ed by sq'Filaable 1aer, iife Qse 215101 CMW plat .m ds9wht am or em"Ween 4aii4 *Om or aslaasd b din Agewaat a as 'Ais4otdps tibia* moil firm *1110 Ayawtirtt i6a11 he meat fo mediatim r a swddt6m psaoa�s6t to igtmetinR 18fd a a4+tieb� aob w by of pea L dm to p atiss on abemim fs mediWm call be In aeooedttwe rm Le Ca®wr1 Maiadm F000ldeefdbeAm11lhn�[NtitlowlNaod11fantbm4�e11ijipef8et AaewatktmBA*m"be6tedm'**w'Wbdta AmniosnAdtlslfmAaheeWmandfwametpsaa. NoIto oEs*tb*kectim oybeietlmikdibtePdodd dap Men doAMgMpmp*ter r3Aimudewa_luMerpsepdafdmeiaPtoCiLi;6pa2aamstarfstpatisa Omtqkmsd sLd be bated M ift btwetn %opow 14311un *aG b Edd m a Lwwim ala apead i4°n by pe>sea 'ILO bras 11310 awotd" soy e2remmt nanftilp Qmc 1131 msiatiaa m a �ire4 aemaa+oaI aparmeL deb apeemet do be adoweableasasetdissabM7e lmdiobao&UNC Ibis Armwmr""pesaoe I byme.hat Offs pdodpal-*m afhstbts all" Ta2lers (wsddrtlo waatRdfeq fn. Aapt IR IMI Cb+ a-" �, V�fv Property Card I Parcel ID Number 250230300 The data prodded her.im is for reference purposes only. This data is rwt sudable for legal, engineering, surveying or other s miu purposes. Garver Gounry does nor guaumu,,, nm � _ information contained heron. This data is rum tdred on an as is Eris and Caner County makes no representations or warranties, either expressed or implied, for the merchantability w fitness of the nlonnahon provided (or any purpose. This disclaimer is provEed pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 066.03 and the use, of the data provided herein acknowledges that Caner Courby shall rwt be bable for arty damages. and by using thisdata in any way exprassfy waives all claims. and agrees to defend. ndemndy, and hold harmless Carver County, ds oRwa6, oRcers. agents. amplayees, etc. from any and all claims brought by anyone wbo uses be information provided for hereinits empkiyees or agents. or CARVER Niro pa dies whldh arse out of users access. By acceptance of this data. be user agrees not to lraremL this date or provide access m it or any pad of It to another parry unless the user Incbdes COUNTY vdth the data a copy of this disclaimer. Monday, October 03, 2016 Carver County. MN asAh Taxpayer Information Taxpayer Name LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT LLC } ` Mailing Address 4600 KINGS POINT RD j MINNETRISTA, MN 55331-9628 Property Address Address City Parcel Information - Uses Agricultural Acres 54.07 Net Acres ded AcreGIS Dees 51.1 Plat Lot Block Tax Description Building Information Building Style Above Grade Bedrooms Finished Sq Ft Year Built Garage N Bathrooms Miscellaneous Information School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Aa Preserve 0112 WS 064 RILEY PURG BLUFF N Y N Assessor Information Estimated Market Value 2015 Values (Payable 2016) 2016 Values (Payable 2017) Last Sale Land $3,928,300.00 $5,888,200.00 Date of Sale 07/28/2015 Building $0.00 $0.00 Sale Value $6,068,160.00 Total 1 $3,9281300.00 $5,888,200.00 The data prodded her.im is for reference purposes only. This data is rwt sudable for legal, engineering, surveying or other s miu purposes. Garver Gounry does nor guaumu,,, nm � _ information contained heron. This data is rum tdred on an as is Eris and Caner County makes no representations or warranties, either expressed or implied, for the merchantability w fitness of the nlonnahon provided (or any purpose. This disclaimer is provEed pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 066.03 and the use, of the data provided herein acknowledges that Caner Courby shall rwt be bable for arty damages. and by using thisdata in any way exprassfy waives all claims. and agrees to defend. ndemndy, and hold harmless Carver County, ds oRwa6, oRcers. agents. amplayees, etc. from any and all claims brought by anyone wbo uses be information provided for hereinits empkiyees or agents. or CARVER Niro pa dies whldh arse out of users access. By acceptance of this data. be user agrees not to lraremL this date or provide access m it or any pad of It to another parry unless the user Incbdes COUNTY vdth the data a copy of this disclaimer. Monday, October 03, 2016 Carver County. MN Property Card Parcel ID Number 250230500 Taxpayer Information Taxpayer Name LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT LLC Mailing Address 4600 KINGS POINT RD MINNETRISTA, MN 55331-9628 Property Address Address City Parcel Information Uses Agricultural GIS Acres 24.55 I Net Acres Deeded Acres 25.84 Lot Tax Description NE1/4 SW1 /4 EXC: THAT P/O SHOWN AS PARCEL 64 ON MN DOT R -O -W PLAT 10-19 1 Building Information Building Style Above radeS Bedrooms Last Sale Finished Ft $1,969,800.00 $3,086,700.00 Date of Sale 07/28/2015 Building Year Built Garage N Bathrooms Miscellaneous Information School District Watershed District HomesteadI Green Acres I Ag Preserve 0112 WS 064 RILEY PURG BLUFF N Assessor Information Estimated Market Value 2015 Values (Payable 2016) 2016 Values (Payable 2017) Last Sale Land $1,969,800.00 $3,086,700.00 Date of Sale 07/28/2015 Building $0.00 $0.00 Sale Value $4,466,840.00 Total $1,969,800.00 $3,086,700.00 The data provided herewM is for reference purposes pniy. This data is rot suitable for legal, engineering, surveying or other s,maar purposes...a,ve, won',y u,F= ��. y,.��••__ ..�----.--, _..._ information contained herein. This data is furnished on an as is basis and Carver County makes no representations or warranties. eiter expressed or implied. for tha merchantability orfilness of Me ioforphishon provided for any purpose. This disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota statutes §466.03 and the user of re data provid" hares, acknowledges rat Carver County shall not be liable for any damagesand by using the data in any way expressly waives all claims. and agrees to defend. indemnify, and hold harmless Carver County, As otficiafs, orders. agents, ampbyess. etc, from any and all chims bmuglo by anyone who uses the information provided for hereinits employees or agents. or CARVER Mind Pardee wh,ch arse apt of user's access. By acceptance of this data, the user agrees not traMMd this data or provide access to it or any pan of it to another party unless the user Iockides COUNTY with the data a copy of this disclaimer. Monday, October 03, 2016 Carver County, MN • L A N D F O R M From Site to Finish • • • 105 South Fifth Avenue Tel: 612-252-9070 TRANSMITTAL Suite 513 Fax 612-27 Minneapolis, MN55401 www.landtorm.nerm.net PROJECT NAME Avienda PROJECT NUMBER SCD14001 _ DATE 09/30/2016 TRANSMITTED TO Company City of Chanhassen _ Name Kate Aanenson, AICP _ _ _ — --......_..------------ Address 1 7700 Market Blvd Address 2 P.O. Box 147 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: AS REQUESTED ❑ FORAPPROVAL ® FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ❑ FORYOUR USE ❑ APPROVAL AS NOTED ❑ RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS ❑ REMARKS: FILE: SCD14001 COPY TO: lanUeorm am Site to Finish' am m memd sery matt &LaMam PmkSSi 8eni[ee, LLC. 1 SIGNED Darren Lazan City, State, Zip Code Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone Number 952-227-1139 WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS VIA Courier COPIES DATE SHEET NUMBER DESCRIPTION 7 09/30/16 Concept Plan (5 Sheets) 7 09/30/16 Narrative 1 09/30/16 Application 1 09/30/16 Application Check 1 09/30/16 CID THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: AS REQUESTED ❑ FORAPPROVAL ® FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ❑ FORYOUR USE ❑ APPROVAL AS NOTED ❑ RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS ❑ REMARKS: FILE: SCD14001 COPY TO: lanUeorm am Site to Finish' am m memd sery matt &LaMam PmkSSi 8eni[ee, LLC. 1 SIGNED Darren Lazan COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1130 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 Agency Re O Contact: Kate Aane Communi Planning Novemb Applicatio To conside (Avienda) o Regional C plan includ 7 Develo Plannin AGENCY REVIEW REQUEST LAND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL CITY OF CBANEASSEN Please review and respond no later than the review response deadline view Request Date: er Agency Review Response Deadline: Date Application Filed: ctober 3, 2016 October 20, 2016 September 30, 2016 ® Contact Phone: Contact Email: nson, AICP 952-227-1139 kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Development Director Water Resources ❑ Commission Date: City Council Date: 60 -Day Review Period Deadline: 1, 2016 at 7:00 .m. November 28, 2016 at 7:00 .m. November 29, 2016 n: r a request for Concept Planned Use Development for a regional destination, lifestyle and mixed use center n five parcels totaling 118 acres on property zoned Agricultural Estate District (A-2) with a land use designation of ommercial or Office use, and located at the southwest corner of Lyman and Powers Boulevards. The concept es residential, commercial, hotel, and office uses. Applicant: Landform Professional Services. LLC. Owner: Level Ment. Case: 2016-25 Web Page: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-25 In order for staff to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. City Departments: ® Attorney ® Building Official ® Engineer ® Fire Marshal ® Forester ® Park Director ® Water Resources ❑ Law Enforcement Carver Count Agencies: Community Development Engineer Environmental Services Historical Society Parks Soil & Water Conservation District State Agencies: ® Board of Water & Soil Resources ❑ Health ❑ Historical Society ❑ Natural Resources -Forestry ❑ Natural Resources -Hydrology ❑ Pollution Control ❑ Transportation Federal Agencies: ® Army Corps of Engineers ❑ US Fish & Wildlife Watershed Districts: ❑ Carver CountyWMO ❑ Lower MN River ❑ Minnehaha Creek ® Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Utilities: ® Cable TV — Mediacom ❑ Electric — Minnesota Valley ® Electric —Xcel Energy ❑ Magellan Pipeline ® Natural Gas — CenterPoint Energy ® Phone — Centuryt-ink Adjacent Cities: ® Chaska ❑ Eden Prairie ❑ Jackson Township ❑ Minnetonka ❑ Shorewood ❑ Victoria Adjacent Counties: ❑ Hennepin ❑ Scott School Districts: ® Eastern Carver County 112 ❑ Minnetonka 276 Other Agencies: ❑ Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority ❑ MN Landscape Arboretum ® SouthWest Transit ❑ TC&W Railroad Aanenson, Kate From: Thomas, John <ThomasJohn@District112.org> Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 9:36 AM To: Kahring, DeeDee; Brecht, David; Aanenson, Kate Cc: Bauck, James Subject: RE: Agency Review Request - Avienda Residential, Commercial, Hotel & Office Concept Plan Good morning Kate — Dee Dee Kahring forwarded your email communications to me regarding the proposed development at Lyman and Powers Blvd. I've reviewed the proposal, and I have one concern regarding the High Density Residential area. Referring to the Land Uses 2016 Proposed Concept graphic on page 4, it appears that the smaller HDR (3.45ac) will only be accessible using parking lots or a secondary road/driveway. My concern is, as the Transportation Manager of the school district, that we don't want to route our school buses into areas that may not be designed and maintained for larger vehicles. For instance, our aim is to stay on city streets that were built for heavier traffic by heavier vehicles, and will be plowed in a timely manner in the winter. We also do not want to use parking lots where turns may be tight and our buses are mixing with a large amount of personal vehicles. Based on the graphic, my thought is that we would use Bluff Creek Blvd. and have a bus stop established on that road for the 9.01ac building. However, in order to pick up students for the 3.45ac building, we will need to use the secondary road and parking lots, which concerns me. Therefore, I would like to request/recommend consideration to make the secondary access road on the south side of the 9.01ac building more substantial and possibly be considered a city street so that it can be maintained at the same level as Bluff Creek Blvd. I'd like to see it wide enough for large vehicles to pass each other safely, with a sidewalk on one or both sides. I hope this makes sense to you. I'd be happy to discuss this further with you if you're not clear from my description. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to review this. Sincerely, John Thomas, Transportation Manager Eastern Carver County Schools 952-556-6161 From: Kahring, DeeDee Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 3:11 PM To: Thomas, John <ThomasJohn@District112.org>; Brecht, David <BrechtD@District112.org> Cc: Bauck, Jim <BauckJ@District112.org> Subject: FAN: Agency Review Request - Avienda Residential, Commercial, Hotel & Office Concept Plan Development information for Lyman and Powers Blvd. follow instructions below. DeeDee Kahring, SFO Director of Finance & Operations Eastern Carver County Schools 111 Peavey Road, Chaska, MN 55318 952-556-6261 www.districtl12 orad facebook.com/ISD1121 ISD112 Exceptional, Personalized Learning From: Potter, Jenny [mailto:JPotter@ci chanhassen.mn.usl Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 11:13 AM To: Kahring, DeeDee <KahringD@District112.org> Cc: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: RE: Agency Review Request - Avienda Residential, Commercial, Hotel & Office Concept Plan Here is the agency review request. To get to all the documents click on the following link and then on Project Documents. httl2:1/www:ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-25 Let me know if you need further assistance. Jenny From: Kahring, DeeDee [mailto:KahringD@District112.orgj Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 11:10 AM To: Potter, Jenny <JPotter@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: RE: Agency Review Request - Avienda Residential, Commercial, Hotel & Office Concept Plan Jenny There wasn't an attachment to your email. DeeDee DeeDee Kahring, SFO Director of Finance 8 Operations Eastern Carver County Schools 111 Peavey Road, Chaska, MN 55318 952-556-6261 www districtl12 oral facebook.com/ISD1121I(� SD112 Exceptional, Personalized Learning From: Potter, Jenny [mailto:JPotter@ci.chanhassen.mn.usl Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 10:34 AM To: Knutson, Roger <rknutson@ck-law.com>; Mohn, Jerry <imohn@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Fauske, Alyson <AFausketaaci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Littfin, Mark <mlittfin@ci chanhassen.mn.us>; Sinclair, Jill <isinclair(c7ci chanhassen.mn.us>; Hoffman, Todd <thoffman@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Jeffery, Terry <>; Irobient@co.carver.mn.us: ben.mever@state.mn.us chentges@co.carver.mn.us; Melissa.M.Jennv@usace.army.mil: cbleser@robcwd.org; cthompson CED media comcc.com; Karl.r.iohnson xcelenergv.com; cherie.monson@CenterPointEnergv.com; Randall.Olson@centurvlink.com; Kringwaldraa chaskamn.com; Kahring, DeeDee <KahringD@District112.org>; Simich, Len <lsimich@swtransit.or-R>; All isonS@ ca rvercda.org Cc: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Agency Review Request - Avienda Residential, Commercial, Hotel & Office Concept Plan Development Plan Review Agencies: Please review the attached request and respond with your comments (if any) no later than October 20, 2016 to: City of Chanhassen PO Box 14-1 Chanhassen, MN 5 kaanenson ci.chanhassen.mn.us Replies to the email will be automatically copied to Kate. You can view the project web page that includes a link to the project documents at http:/Lw—ww.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-25. Thankyoul Senior Administration Support Specialist CITY OF CHANHASSEN P 0 BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 10/03/2016 2:34 PM Receipt No. 00327956 CLERK: AshleyM PAYEE: Level 7 Development LLC 4600 Kings Point Road Minnetrista MN 55331- Avienda- Planning Case 2016-25 ---------------- ----------- Notification Sign 200.00 Rezoning Fees 750.00 Total 950.00 Cash 0.00 Check 6212 950.00 Change 0.00 Aanenson, Kate From: Jennifer Swanson <swanjls@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 2:17 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Cc: Tjornhom, Bethany; Ryan, Elise; McDonald, Jerry; Campion, Dan Subject: Re: Proposed Developmetn Kate, Fair enough. Let me put my opinions forward on the development then. The independent study which was conducted by McCombs indicated that the sight has the ability to support over 800,00 square footage of retail space and that this would be a regional draw that would provide significant financial benefit to the City of Chanhassen and it's residents. The current proposal put forth by the developer is significantly less that what this independent study puts forth. A more substantial retail commitment on the developer would support the conclusions of this study. The current mix of retail / office / housing falls short of what the conclusions of this study put forth and in my opinion would be unwise for the city to approve. Thanks > On Nov 4, 2016, at 8:27 AM, Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> wrote: > Eric and Jennifer, > Thanks you for your comments. The city is just beginning the review of Avienda. In the staff report are the uses permitted in the RC district. You can also find this in this city code under the zoning ordinances that housings is a permitted use in the RC district. A mixed use development like Villages on the Pond includes housing. What the housing will be and how much is yet to be determined. There is a housing study that was done for Carver County that is being updated by the Carver County Community Development Agency. This will give the city additional information on the housing types and the demand in the city. The developer has evaluated the amount of retail they believe the market can support. The update of the AUAR, the environmental assessment, will also determine the amount and mix of uses the site can support. > Kate > Kathryn Aanenson, AICP > Community Development Director > City of Chanhassen > 952-227-1139 > "Planning for Today, Providing for Tommorrow" > -----Original Message----- * From: Jennifer Swanson [mailto:swanjls@yahoo.comj > Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 5:21 PM > To: Aanenson, Kate > Subject: Proposed Developmetn > Kate, > I had the opportunity to view the planning meeting earlier this week regarding the proposed development at Lyman and Powers Blvd. You had indicated that one of the goals of the project was to have a housing component as part of the project. When the previous study was conducted there was not to my knowledge a housing component identified for the site. I am curious when that change took place. You had also indicated that the southwest building was to be designated as senior housing. In the McComb study there was a conclusion that the site could support 825k -1M+ of retail and would be a regional draw. The concern that I have is that because a significant portion of the project is being developed as housing there will not be the appropriate square footage available for retail to make this a regional draw. If the PUD approves the proposed layout toward the acreage designated for High Density housing what guarantee will there be that it is senior housing vs Market Rate apartments. I feel that the location of this project gives significant retail advantages over other locations in Chanhassen. The close proximity to Highway 212 gives the potential for retail development and will utilize existing infrastructure. > Eric Swanson > 1440 Bethesda Cir > Chanhassen, MN Aanenson, Kate From: geetha bhatraj <gbhatraj22@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 10:18 AM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Avienda Development Hi Kate, This is Geetha. I live in the neighborhood on the preserve. I attended the discussion the last week or before in regards to the Avienda development. Cooks to be a great development initiative. It was brought to our notice that there could be a possible road connection from the Mills drive into the new development for School bus and public Safety. Ours is a young neighborhood with lot of infants and toddlers. So having that road extension is not a great value addition for the community as it might increase thru traffic and increase safety concerns. This is due to the fact that once we have a road we really cannot restrict the traffic. By having dead end will restrict the traffic. During the meeting same concerns were raised by other members in the neighborhood. Please consider this as a sincere request from our neighborhood not to have a road extension on Mills drive. Hope council takes decision considering preserve residents opinion. Thanks Geetha COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TTT��TTT{{�I**IuuTTTT��jjTT��((\\�'( ��j11f�N Mailing Division —7700Market Boulevard CITY OF C11fI1111f1A)SL11 Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Submityt Date: PC Date: 1111 J 1 to CC Date: L{, 60 -Day Review Date: (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ......................... $600 ❑ ❑ ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers..... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) $100 ❑ ❑ Single -Family Residence ................................ $325 ❑ ❑ All Others ......................................................... $425 ❑ Interim Use Permit (IUP) $150 ❑ ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 ❑ ❑ All Others......................................................... $425 ❑ Rezoning (REZ) $300 ❑ 0 Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 ❑ ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD ................. $100 ❑ ❑ All Others......................................................... $500 ❑ Sign Plan Review...................................................$150 $150 ❑ Site Plan Review (SPR) $150 ❑ ❑ Administrative ..................................................$100 $100 ❑ ❑ Commercial/Industdal Districts` ...................... $500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: through the development contract. (_ thousand square feet) 'Include number of existing employees: Include number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts ......................................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit (_ units) ❑� Notification Sign (City to install and remove) .......................... Subdivision (SUB) ❑ Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $300 ❑ Create over 3 lots .......................$600 + $15 per lot ❑ lots) $200 ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots)..................................$300 ❑ Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 $150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ......................................... $150 ❑ Final Plat ..........................................................$700 $100 ❑ (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)' $500 Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... $150 ❑ All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ...................................................... $100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. ............... $200 ❑ Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate after pre -application meeting) .................................................. $3 per address (_ addresses) ❑ Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply) ......................................... ....... $50 per document El Conditional Use Permit EI Interim Use Permit El site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation ❑ Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) ❑ Easements ( easements) TOTAL FEE: $950.00 Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: See Attached Narrative Property Address or Location: SW corner of Powers Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard Parcel yf_ See Attached Legal Description:, Total Acreage: 116.00 Wetlands Present? ® Yes ❑ No See Attached Present Zoning: Agricultural Estate District (A2) Requested Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Present Land Use Designation: Commercial Requested Land Use Designation: Commercial Existing Use of Property: single family home and vacant, agriculture land ❑7 Ch4eck box is separate narrative is attached. Property APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, 1, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. 1 agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Landform Professional Services, LLC Contact: Kendra Lindahl Address: 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513 Phone: (612) 638-0225 City/State/Zip: Minneapolis, MN 55330 Cell: (612) 290-8102 Email: klindahl@landform.net Fax: (612) 252-9077 Kendra Lindahl AICP MgUlry sgss9 by KeMm UI hl, ACP Signature: D.WM16A9.P 17.19:51-050P Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, 1, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Level 7 Development Contact: Bahram Akradi Address: 600 !315930 Kings Point Road Phone: 952— City/State2ip: Minnetrista, MN 55331 Cell: vl /Z—'s 12 _ 1Z. k-4— ZEmail: Email:^A /arr A ®Life-F% - te A `f %JL-X .C-Or7 Fax: Signature:s� d �,�, _ Date: 9 • Z$— o/ This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER ('If applicable) Name: Landform Professsional Services, LLC Contact: Steven Sabraski Address: 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513 Phone: (612) 638-0243 City/State/Zip: Minneapolis, MN 55401 Cell: Email: ssabraski@landform.net Fax: (612) 252-9077 Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? 'Other Contact Information: R] Property Owner Via: ❑� Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: R1 Applicant Via: ❑� Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: ❑ Engineer Via: [-]Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other- Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing (required). SAVE FORM PRIM FORM SUBMIT FORM t AVIENDA Concept Submittal Exhibit Contents: 1. Regional Context 2. Site Analysis 3. Proposed Land Use 4. Development Plan 3.5 5. Concept Plan Options for Center Village n• Lake Bavaria 9 "• ;` . �'r..: "'.�".•,'i w •/ ..r, A .f °+".. P h 'ani, iW ,4 � a � _ LakeAnn�` Y Downtown Chanhassen Chanhassen Arboretum - e. F" Chanhassen High School Rice N7ar Perk - Project Site r+-rT` • , , S ! " " Hazeltine Lake ,, .. Flying LLoud Airport Lake Riley aa.* �, •' a:.....,' _ �� Chaska High School' '� t y`e� '* �t j E �, ►: 212 Medical Center s l Available Land t� ' Existing Trail / Sidewalk ,' `t .jr' Rice Lake F , r , C j • • • • in collaboration with: LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT L A N D F O R M RSP ARCHITECTS • COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL AVIENDA • Chanhassen, MN Concept Submittal • 09.30.2016 4 .S 1 EL -, —n u Lyma Bole va'rd Edges Sensitive to Adjacent Use J i Access to Lyman Blvd Existing Wetlands C �! Potential Connection :r Signaled Access . -. Existing Residential ! t o` Neighborhood Access i it r' ■ - - - _ w. Densely Wooded Knoll so y - , \ Emergency Access \\`\ ■ , _. ' IF (' t • • • • in collaboration with: LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT L A N D F O R M RSP ARCHITECTS• COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL AVIENDA - Chanhassen, MN Concent Submittal • 09.30.2016 Land Uses from 2012 HKGi AUAR Concepts (constrained to project site) CONCEPT 2 (Acres) Regional Commercial Office - High Density Res. - Medium Density Res. - Stormwater - Conservation Regional Commercial - Office - Mixed Use - High Density Res. Medium Density Res. - Stormwater Conservation CONCEPT 3 (acres) -� - Regional Commercial 1.4 Office High Density Res. 13.5; Medium Density Res. - Stormwater Conservation AVIENDA r-- 9.56 Ac 5.33 Ac 2.58 Ac 3.38 Ac i` 1 1.33 Ac 3.27 Ac 1.86 Ac Land Uses 2016 1.57 Ac Proposed Concept 2.04 Ac I I IR (Acres) 0 _Regional Commercial !1.83 Ac 14,56 Office z.58 AcF9.93 ` =High Density Residential 9.01 Ac 2.45 Ac 9.56 Medium Density Residential 3.45 Ac _Alternative BMPs may be implemented in plan 15.88 Conservation 15.88 Ac 11.04 Right -of -Way *Site plan is for illustrative purposes only and is subject to change. 113.79 Total Development (Acres) AVIENDA *Site plan is for illustrative purposes only and is subject to change. Legend Future Traffic Signal 6dsti g Traffic Signal Stall Count Public Right Of Way Ponding Preservation Wetland and Buffer Regional Commercial Office High Density Residential Medium Density Residential Regional Man Gross Net i AVIENDA *Site plan is for illustrative purposes only and is subject to change. Legend Future Traffic Signal 6dsti g Traffic Signal Stall Count Public Right Of Way Ponding Preservation Wetland and Buffer Regional Commercial Office High Density Residential Medium Density Residential Regional Man Gross Net Developable Building Area Parking Units/ Section Area Area (S.F.) Stalls Beds (Anes) (Acres) 9.93 9.55 108,000 573 0 1.33 1.33 7,000 99 O 9.01 8.57 93,000 128 312 e 9.56 6.32 68,000 nla 72 • 5.33 2.97 50,000 197 • 2.58 2.58 30,000 191 0 3.38 3.38 33,000 249 0 3.27 3.27 60,000 259 • 1.86 1.63 6,500 115 • 1.57 1.20 6,500 96 0 2.04 1.64 6,500 119 0 1.83 1.83 7,000 104 0 26.70 26.70 254,500 1364 • 2.45 2.45 25,000 138 150 • 2.58 1.91 25,000 115 100 40 3.45 3.02 40,000 108 92 11.04 0.00 nla nla 15.88 0.00 nla n/a AVIENDA ion =MAN B IJ *Site plan is for illustrative purposes only and is subject to change. - �• o 30 X2 ��-� •• `er 16 • j7 _ 4 OPTION 2 OPTION 3 OPTION 4 11/1/2016 Concept PUD Mixed Use Retail LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT, LLC Planning Commission November 1, 2016 City Council November 28, 2016 1 r Location Map C 7Development z.66 ONfedi= A -z AgieWtmW Fs to ®level Inc. t66 ensu, Dfedium Dentin' A -z AgicWtwal Estate Ievel 7 Development IIM, 507 office or Commercial A-2 Agicultural Estate Ierel 7 Development Inc. 20 OIHce or Commemal .A-2 AgieWtmal Estate level 7 Development t6 OBce or Commercial A-2 Agiccd=d Estate r� Inc. Ieve17 Development 4 office or Conon rt al A-2 AgnecItural Fatale Inc. . - Total u8.62 1 11/1/2016 PUD Review for the Level 7 L1. Concept PUD Review A. Development Stage - preliminary plat 3. AUAR -Alternative Urban Areawide Review 4. Final Stage Final Plat 5. Site plan review an individual buildings Concept PUD — What is required? Chapter 30 - ZaniW. Ankle VIII. - PlammM Unit HcvelMment District. D., "o, 3. - pra:Mufes See. 20.517. -General eonrept plan. (a) N orM to r eive puidzna in the design ofa PUD prior to submission of a formal application, an apPliesel may submit s corsapt plan for tevim and mmmal by the plarmitg commission aM city corner Submias'im of a except plan is optiotal but is highly recommended for Ieop PUDs. In eider fa the reir, lobe of irt help to the applicant, th, cats yt plan should contain such spsifie infotrnation as is suggati by the city. Gmcally, this information should wclude the followingfot inmdim apprW^ate to the type of devel W mors, a g.. commercial, industrial or fesidmtial: (1) Approaimate building areas, pedeslnan ways and road locations: (2) Heigftt, bulk and square hoists, of buildin,,,: (3) T,pe. numbs or square fomagc a latotomes of apaifie land uses: (a) Norther ofdweiling toiv: (5) Gmcaliud dedofir,nt plan shoeing erica' re be M'elWecl or presenM: and (6) Soaping and timing ofted Lcvdepau (b) The I.., xnna coram' of all ,oso, .w,qa xithin the PrWos i PLN scull be, filed with the cin before the staff comlrcncer raiev. App rmal of the wncept silt shill nm obligate the city to apPrme the final plan or am- pan thereof or to raaae the propetr to a planned unit dinstopmem d&triet. (e) Tic fol aceWrvee of land user is subject to the fallowmg protimes'. I I1 Tire dmel'er t u s,ioh the cin staff'. discuss the "'osi do el'.. 131 TM sat,heam shall file Lire tmr yt suer of,hootion and concept pizu oogahr with all suppmiltg dada 131 The Plarming commission shall cadurt a luring and make raomme osehons to ted cin camcil. Naia of the hannF shall com'isa Ma legal prW , description, desagtim d requm. aM M publisbM N Dire oRsial rrtsssfapa at least tm eh.s Pner to lire is m Written mtif tion of ted hanng sbdl be nailed at last tm dein priatheeo b pwpvs o< land xithin SfNt foes of the boimdar>of the pV erty and an on-site twtifiooi.n sign a mM lal Pdlowing the recent of the resort vd rsomnenda'iaa' fiom the plamwg canmision the cin- caueil shell easidm the couoeil mm smatters m the caeapt plan 2 11/1/2016 Intent of PUD Application The PUD process provides for an opportunity to receive clear direction from the Planning Commission, the City Council and the residents of Chanhassen. The city's expectation is that the proposed development will be of higher quality and create a sense of place and identity for the community. The development shall provide regional and community scale including retail, office, and services uses that complement existing commercial uses in the downtown and provide shopping opportunities not currently located in the community. The development must also be sensitive to environmental features on site including topography, vegetation, wetlands and scenic views. Finally, the project should have appropriate transitions between uses. 11/1/2016 Q VISION Sec. 2o-sog. - Standards and guidelines for regional/lifestyle center commercial planned unit The land use change to either Office or Regional Commercial District as a part of the 1030 Comprehensive Plan was based developments. on the city 1i vision for the a lifestyle center. The Comprehensive Plan states: (1) Theme of planned unit developments for regiomi/lifestyle center commercial purposes should result in a reasonable and verifiable exchange between the city and the developer This district is intended to provide for the development of 2.7.4 Regional/Lifestyle Center Commercial regional and community scale integrated retail, office, business services, personal services and services to the traveling public near freeway interchanges. It shall strive to create a self-sustaining pattern of land uses with cultural, `Defmkionlrision: A mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a (2) The regional/lifestyle center commercial district is a mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a regional market. The physical environment emphasizes an attractive comfortable walking experience for shoppers and visitors scale and function that serves a regional market. The physical environment emphasizes an attractive, comfortable and is designed to serve trail users and mass transit as well as automobile traffic. Centers of this type have at least two automobile traffic. Centers of this type, generally, have at least two major retail anchors and are characterized by major retail anchors and are characterized by the diversity and mix of retail and service uses within their boundaries. the diversity of mixed retail and service uses. Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in the other commercial districts. Development of these (3) Development of these centers shall be planned as a group of organized uses and structures to accommodate a sensitive centers shall be planned as a group of organized uses and structures to accommodate a sensitive transition between commercial transition between commercial activities such as loading, parking of automobiles, lighting and trash collection and activities such as loading, parking of automobiles, lighting and trash collection and surrounding residential uses. Such centers exterior building materials, and a coordinated landscaping theme, but shall avoid monotony in design and visual shall be designed with one theme, with similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials, and a coordinated appearance. Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation landscaping thane. Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system. Goods and Services Examples Entertainment Restaurants Specialty Retail/Boutique Department Store Hotels Residential Comparison Shopping Q The RC Zoning District is found in the PUD District. Sec. 2o-sog. - Standards and guidelines for regional/lifestyle center commercial planned unit developments. (a) Intent. (1) Theme of planned unit developments for regiomi/lifestyle center commercial purposes should result in a reasonable and verifiable exchange between the city and the developer This district is intended to provide for the development of regional and community scale integrated retail, office, business services, personal services and services to the traveling public near freeway interchanges. It shall strive to create a self-sustaining pattern of land uses with cultural, employment, entertainment, housing, shopping and social components. (2) The regional/lifestyle center commercial district is a mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market. The physical environment emphasizes an attractive, comfortable walking experience for shoppers and visitors. It shall be designed to serve pedestrian and mass transit users as well as automobile traffic. Centers of this type, generally, have at least two major retail anchors and are characterized by the diversity of mixed retail and service uses. Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in the other commercial districts. (3) Development of these centers shall be planned as a group of organized uses and structures to accommodate a sensitive transition between commercial activities such as loading, parking of automobiles, lighting and trash collection and surrounding residential uses. Such centers shall be designed with one theme, with similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials, and a coordinated landscaping theme, but shall avoid monotony in design and visual appearance. Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation systern. Q 11/1/2016 Lem-'�A1R!!!'lIEI�TD T26 Summary of Uses Ikf Apartments 404 units Townhouses 72 units D,.witk 250 rooms Legend NM9g Join' Setlion Retai area (6F) 61e9s BeCs Iba) Ibasl Tra'fc Sgnal Q I 955 108.000 573 1 1 f� 133 113 T 030 E.Wjhg TraRr Saw' 1 r G 0 957 93000 128 312 0 9% 632 68.000 Eta Cwh: 72 1 1 0 297 50000 19] O 259 259 MIX Ps c Rlgh, a way 0 1 1 0 0 338 33.000 219 O II 327 w000 259 1 1 • 1%3 6,500 115 0 �5� 120 6500 Aeservav� 0 C ' 181 6,500 119 O o 183 7.000 5'ia]anC a"BUPe O =�o 2670 254500 1364 O _ — 245 Q Regional Comm al 15( Q 258 191 25.000 Ogre 10( O 315 Y. 0 High DMty Re - Jal 9: C for 000 we Ma G 15M tp 4 Q hled r Deafly RnIMI'ta Lem-'�A1R!!!'lIEI�TD T26 Summary of Uses Ikf Apartments 404 units Townhouses 72 units D,.witk 250 rooms 8wtleg Nea NM9g Join' Setlion Retai area (6F) 61e9s BeCs Iba) Ibasl Q 993 955 108.000 573 G 133 113 T 030 99 G 901 957 93000 128 312 0 9% 632 68.000 A 72 O 533 297 50000 19] O 259 259 MIX 191 O 339 338 33.000 219 O 327 327 w000 259 O 1M 1%3 6,500 115 0 157 120 6500 98 C 201 181 6,500 119 O 183 183 7.000 104 O 2670 2670 254500 1364 O 215 245 25 M 136 15( Q 258 191 25.000 115 10( O 315 302 4D.000 108 9: C 1101 000 we Ma G 15M 0.00 ole A Lem-'�A1R!!!'lIEI�TD T26 Summary of Uses Avienda Apartments 404 units Townhouses 72 units Hotel 250 rooms Office 173,000 sq. ft. Restaurants 133,500 sq. ft. Retai 362,500 sq. ft. 5 T n CWS -212 POTENTIAL GROSS LEASABLE AREA titore Celeyop _ I Com enicncc GuoJs Sboppinv Goofs _ L. Anclmr Stores__ Junior anchors_ L_ Inline Stores Subloul — Food Senice Restavnnts fazt 4nnJ cvinotal -Sen icer �fa(IiW ti011 titort'a IbahA flub unto, ncn,a �_ snnmmi �TO1']I. Low 11/1/2016 0 - r p`R Water Resources e Fiyn 7 - E xulry Cul0ltlpm (7813 G rK R W oprapll) 0 apo 16.o1►in•n.w4i4p�5101sa1n A_ �^ Rises 0 IpuA Palh�ui� 11/1/2016 PROPOSED ACTION "The Planning Commission provides observations and feedback on the concept planned unit development including the comments staff report." KEY ELEMENTS: . s..w,.w•. a... n>.enmwr.p..r.w+v- , ww..m..xoor�e . cnr,.v,e,enwnc,eweai..wi wru evwr�.e.e,aw.w V1 A-1 MEMORANDUM CY OF TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager CIIIIIIIIA►1SEN FROM: Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director 7700 Market PO Box 147levard DATE: October 24, 2016 Chanhassen, MN 55317 approval is not legally binding, the goal is to give direction to the applicant on staff's Fax:952.227,1110 SUBJ: Avienda Administration November City Council meeting, staff will have prepared for the city council's Phone: 952.2271100 Fax: 952.227.1110 BACKGROUND Building inspections The applicant, Level 7 Development, LLC, would like to introduce their proposed Phone: 952.227.1180 mixed-use plan for the City Council to review. The project area for this application Fax:952.227.1190 has increased to 120 acres from 70 acres in the previous application. The concept 2310 Coulter Boulevard PUD application is in process. A neighborhood meeting has been scheduled for Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 October 19, a public hearing will be held with the Planning Commission on Fax: 952.227.1170 November 1, and the City Council will review the item on November 28. Finance The review process is to consider approval of a concept PUD. While concept Phone: 952.227.1140 approval is not legally binding, the goal is to give direction to the applicant on staff's Fax:952.227,1110 and city council's expectations for the submittal for preliminary approval. At the November City Council meeting, staff will have prepared for the city council's Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 consideration the authorization of an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR). Fax: 952.227.1110 In order for the project to proceed, the environmental documents need to be updated and a traffic study needs to be completed to assist with the overall review of the Recreation Center proposed development. 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 ANALYSIS Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & While this is an introductory meeting, staff would like the council to be aware of Natural Resources some of the major elements of the proposed development plan: Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax:952.227.1110 1. Number of wetland alterations 2. Surface Water Management Public Works 3. trading and the impact of required connections 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 4. Lack of a gathering place\connections Fax: 962-227.1310 5. Considerations of critical issues from the April 20, 2015 Visioning Process Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Website W WWXl.Chanhass¢n.mn.us Chanhassen is a Community for Lite . Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrovr Todd Gerhardt October 24, 2016 Page 2 of 3 Figure 2 - Existing Conditions (2013 Carve Photograph) 0 500 The District at Vincent Ridge (KES 2015-013) 11Feet Chanhassen, Minnesota O Nate. tlaatnaries mnrotN i [�� an this tiquure arc approximate F40LMUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COaOMY amldortdeO"IRK W officials yproaucL $Nra:%VpGm[SRI Impar' Rneaae ATTACHMENTS 1. Application for Concept Plan Review. 2. Concept Submittal Exhibit. 3. Summary of Planning Session dated April 20, 2016. g:lplan12016 planning casv5\2016-25 evienda - than remit site\mtro mtg at a 10.2416.docx , .� .r74ac . .. t W L9 066 ac �-60I� ` Pre"Ous', Draned �VF��'' i No: Prese-� 4 VJL8 08 ac 01900 C 56 ac C 02 ac - 1.03 w 0.se.� 013 ac tr ,. aIV Legend t Y ti Pmptl BeunEery lit, - - - OSIS NES NYNW Rewwnf ,{ f seta $emanet We1arM SounOary 1011 BounOarY WNan06 • o at�� ' [ , �r Uranageway -74.wr l� 't/y Nom., ( a�CMren s r Figure 2 - Existing Conditions (2013 Carve Photograph) 0 500 The District at Vincent Ridge (KES 2015-013) 11Feet Chanhassen, Minnesota O Nate. tlaatnaries mnrotN i [�� an this tiquure arc approximate F40LMUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COaOMY amldortdeO"IRK W officials yproaucL $Nra:%VpGm[SRI Impar' Rneaae ATTACHMENTS 1. Application for Concept Plan Review. 2. Concept Submittal Exhibit. 3. Summary of Planning Session dated April 20, 2016. g:lplan12016 planning casv5\2016-25 evienda - than remit site\mtro mtg at a 10.2416.docx AVI EN DA —A Healthy Way of Life Village You are invited to a neighborhood meeting for a planned mixed use Regional Lifestyle Center at the southwest comer of the intersection of Powers and Lyman Boulevards. The Level 7 Development team looks forward to sharing information about our development proposal with you before we present to the City of Chanhassen. Neighborhood Meeting Details: Wednesday, October 19th 6:30 — 7:30 pm Chanhassen Public Library 7711 Kerber Blvd. Chanhassen. MN 55317 'We will have a short presentation and then move into a more informal open house format. We look forward to this exciting opportunity to bong a new development to the City, which may include townhomes, apartments. office, medical and professional services, retail. entertainment and hospitality uses. If you have any questions. please feel free to contact me We would also encourage you to follow Avienda on Facebook at @shopavienda orfacebook.comishopavienda for the latest announcements. Sincerely, Darren Lazan. Landform Phone- 612-63U250 Email. dlazan@landfoonnet Find 15 G11 W V© asnncavenda i andfmm 105 $out 5 Amnw Ste 513 MlnneaWis. MN 55401 I 1 CHAN-212 TRADE AREA DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS AND SALES POTENTIAL I I 1 1 1 1 Prepared for Carlston Commercial RE, LLC June 2014 000 McCOMB GROUI'Ltd. DEDREAL STATE AN 111111RETAIL ECON S U LTANTOS I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 222 South Ninth Street Suite 480 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 -(612)339-7000 Fax: (612) 338-5572 1 CHAN-212 TRADE AREA DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS AND SALES POTENTIAL Prepared for Carlston Commercial RE, LLC Prepared by McComb Group, Ltd. June 2014 © Copyright 2014 McComb Group, Ltd. I ' TABLE OF CONTENTS Chanter Subject Page ' EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................A Chan -212 Location.................................................................................................. vii ' Educational Attainment............................................................................................x Chan -212 Sales Potential.........................................................................................xi 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................1 ReportPurpose..........................................................................................................2 I CHAN-212 LOCATION......................................................................3 RegionalAccess........................................................................................................4 TrafficCounts...........................................................................................................5 H COMPETITIVE SHOPPING AREAS...............................................6 Chanhassen Shopping Areas ...................... Super Regional Shopping Areas ................ Eden Prairie Center Area ....................... Southdale Area ...................................... Ridgedale Area ...................................... Competitive Community Shopping Areas. Shakopee............................................... Chaska................................................... Victoria.................................................. Waconia................................................. Summary.................................................... Competitive Changes ................................. ..........................................7 ..........................................8 ..........................................8 .........................................10 .........................................12 .........................................13 .........................................14 .........................................16 .........................................16 .........................................16 .........................................18 .........................................18 III RESIDENTIAL GROWTH PROJECTIONS..................................19 Convenience Goods Trade Area..............................................................................19 Shopping Goods Trade Area....................................................................................21 IV CHAN-212 TRADE AREAS..............................................................24 ' Population and Households ............... Household Income ............................ Educational Attainment .................... ' Employment ...................................... Demographic Characteristics............ Purchasing Power .............................. 1 i ........................................25 ........................................26 ........................................28 ........................................29 ........................................30 ........................................31 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Chapter Subject Paee V RETAIL SALES TRENDS.................................................................36 MarketShare ............................................................................................................37 SalesPotential..........................................................................................................39 SupportableSpace....................................................................................................40 VI SALES POTENTIAL AND SUPPORTABLE GLA........................42 SupportableGLA.....................................................................................................42 ShoppingCenter Size...............................................................................................44 SalesPotential..........................................................................................................46 APPENDICES Appendix A: Demographic Characteristics............................................................49 Appendix B: Retail and Services Purchasing Power .................... under separate cover Appendix C: Retail and Services Purchasing Power, Market Share, and Sales Potential ............................................. under separate cover Appendix D: Retail and Services Sales Potential and Supportable Space..................................................................... under separate cover ii ' LIST OF TABLES ' Table Subject Page i Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas, and ' Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Population and Household Growth Trends 2000 and 2010 Census; 2014 and 2019 Estimated.............................................viii ' ii Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas, and Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Average and Median Household Income ' 2000 and 2010 Census; 2014 and 2019 Estimated .............................................. ix iii Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Household Income Distribution: 2000 and t2010 Census; 2014 and 2019 Estimated...............................................................x iv Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and ' Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Educational Attainment: 2000 and 2010 Census; 2014 and 2019 Estimated........................................................................x v Chan -212 Sales Potential by Merchandise Category ................................................x ' 1 Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard Average Daily Traffic Counts; 2008, 2010, and 2012.....................................................................................................5 ' 2 Summary of Chanhassen Retail Tenant Mix by Area..............................................8 3 Summary of Eden Prairie Center Area Retail Tenant Mix by Area .........................9 ' 4 Summary of Southdale Area Retail Tenant Mix by Area........................................1 l 5 Summary of Ridgedale Area Retail Tenant Mix by Area........................................13 ' 6 Summary of Shakopee Retail Tenant Mix by Area.................................................15 7 Summary of Chaska, Victoria, and Waconia Retail Tenant Mix by Area...............17 ' 8 Metro Area, Southwest Growth Corridor, Chan -212 Convenience Goods Trade Area Communities, and City of Chanhassen Residential Building Permits; 1990 to 2013..........................................................................................20 ' 9 Metro Area, Southwest Growth Corridor, Chan -212 Convenience Goods Trade Area, and Chan -212 Convenience Goods Trade Area Communities Household Projections; 2014 to 2025.................................................................21 ' 10 Metro Area, Southwest Growth Corridor, Chan -212 Shopping Goods Trade Area Communities, and City of Chanhassen Residential Building ' Permits; 1996 to 2013..........................................................................................22 11 Metro Area, Southwest Growth Corridor, Chan -212 Shopping Goods Trade Area, and Chan -212 Shopping Goods Trade Area Communities ' Household Projections; 2014 to 2025.................................................................22 12 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and ' Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Population and Household Growth Trends 2000 and 2010 Census; 2014 and 2019 Estimated..............................................26 1 Table 1 1 1 1 1 I LIST OF TABLES (continued) Page 13 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Average and Median Household Income 2000 and 2010 Census; 2014 and 2019 Estimated..............................................27 14 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Household Income Distribution 2000 and 2010 Census; 2014 and 2019 Estimated..............................................................27 15 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Educational Attainment 2000 and 2010 Census; 2014 and 2019 Estimated....................................................................................29 16 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: 2014 Employment by Industry ..............................30 17 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: 2014 Employment by Occupation .........................30 18 Chan -212 Convenience Goods Trade Area Demographic and Income Snapshot ... 33 19 Chan -212 Shopping Goods Trade Area Demographic and Income Snapshot ......... 34 20 Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA Demographic and Income Snapshot ............................35 21 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas Retail Purchasing Power: 2012, 2015, 2020, and 2025 .................................................32 22 Chanhassen Retail and Services Sales: 2002, 2007, and 2012 Estimated ...............36 23 Chanhassen Market Share; 2012..............................................................................37 24 Chan -212 Trade Areas Market Share and Trade Area Sales...................................39 25 Chan -212 Shopping Center Retail Purchasing Power, Market Share, and Sales Potential; 2015 by Merchandise Category ..........................................................40 26 Chan -212 Shopping Center Retail Sales Potential and Supportable Space; 2015...41 27 Chan -212 Shopping Goods Supportable GLA by Merchandise Category ..............42 28 Chan -212 Potential Gross Leasable Area................................................................45 29 Chan -212 Sales Potential by Merchandise Category ...............................................46 1 iv LIST OF MAPS Map Subject Page iChan -212 Site.......................................................................................................... vii ii Chan -212 Shopping Goods Trade Area..................................................................viii iii Chan -212 Shopping Goods Trade Area Estimated 2019 Household Income: Percent Above $100,000..................................................................................... ix 1 Chan -212 Site............................................................................................................3 2 Chan -212 Site and Southwest Growth Corridor.......................................................4 3 Competitive Shopping Areas....................................................................................6 4 Chanhassen Retail Nodes..........................................................................................7 5 Chan -212 Convenience Goods Trade Area.............................................................24 6 Chan -212 Shopping Goods Trade Area...................................................................25 7 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas 2019 Estimated Household Income: Percent above $100,000 .....................................28 v ITABLE OF CONTENTS ' Chanter Subject Pace ' EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................vi Chan -212 Location.................................................................................................. vii ' Educational Attainment............................................................................................x Chan -212 Sales Potential.........................................................................................xi INTRODUCTION................................................................................1 ReportPurpose..........................................................................................................2 Convenience Goods Trade Area.......................................................................... ' I CHAN-212 LOCATION......................................................................3 Shopping Goods Trade Area....................................................................................21 RegionalAccess........................................................................................................4 IV CHAN-212 TRADE AREAS..............................................................24 ' Traffic Counts...........................................................................................................5 Population and Households......................................................................................25 HouseholdIncome...................................................................................................26 II COMPETITIVE SHOPPING AREAS...............................................6 Educational Attainment...........................................................................................28 ' Chanhassen Shopping Areas............................................................................... 7 Super Regional Shopping Areas ...............................................................................8 PurchasingPower.....................................................................................................31 ' Eden Prairie Center Area......................................................................................8 SouthdaleArea....................................................................................................10 RidgedaleArea....................................................................................................12 ' Competitive Community Shopping Areas ...............................................................13 Shakopee.............................................................................................................14 Chaska.................................................................................................................16 ' Victoria................................................................................................................16 Waconia...............................................................................................................16 Summary..................................................................................................................18 ' Competitive Changes...............................................................................................18 III RESIDENTIAL GROWTH PROJECTIONS..................................19 Convenience Goods Trade Area.......................................................................... 19 Shopping Goods Trade Area....................................................................................21 IV CHAN-212 TRADE AREAS..............................................................24 ' Population and Households......................................................................................25 HouseholdIncome...................................................................................................26 Educational Attainment...........................................................................................28 ' Employment.............................................................................................................29 Demographic Characteristics...................................................................................30 PurchasingPower.....................................................................................................31 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Chanter Subject Page V RETAIL SALES TRENDS.................................................................36 MarketShare............................................................................................................37 SalesPotential..........................................................................................................39 SupportableSpace....................................................................................................40 VI SALES POTENTIAL AND SUPPORTABLE GLA........................42 SupportableGLA.....................................................................................................42 SalesPotential..........................................................................................................44 APPENDICES Appendix A: Demographic Characteristics............................................................48 Appendix B: Retail and Services Purchasing Power .................... under separate cover Appendix C: Retail and Services Purchasing Power, Market Share, and Sales Potential........................................................................... under separate cover Appendix D: Retail and Services Sales Potential and Supportable Space......................................................................................... under separate cover ii "WYK13ar11,3NNy ' Table Subject Page ' i Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas, and Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Population and Household Growth Trends 2000 and 2010 Census; 2014 and 2019 Estimated.............................................viii ' ii Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas, and Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Average and Median Household Income ' iii 2000 and 2010 Census; 2014 and 2019 Estimated .............................................. Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Household Income Distribution: 2000 and ix ' 2010 Census; 2014 and 2019 Estimated...............................................................x iv Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and ' Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Educational Attainment: 2000 and 2010 Census; 2014 and 2019 Estimated........................................................................x v Chan -212 Sales Potential by Merchandise Category ................................................x t1 Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard Average Daily Traffic Counts; 2008, 2010, and 2012.....................................................................................................5 2 3 Summary of Chanhassen Retail Tenant Mix by Area..............................................8 Summary of Eden Prairie Center Area Retail Tenant Mix by Area .........................9 ' 4 5 Summary of Southdale Area Retail Tenant Mix by Area........................................1 l Summary of Ridgedale Area Retail Tenant Mix by Area........................................13 ' 6 7 Summary of Shakopee Retail Tenant Mix by Area.................................................15 Summary of Chaska, Victoria, and Waconia Retail Tenant Mix by Area...............17 ' 8 Metro Area, Southwest Growth Corridor, Chan -212 Convenience Goods Trade Area Communities, and City of Chanhassen Residential Building Permits; 1990 to 2013..........................................................................................20 ' 9 Metro Area, Southwest Growth Corridor, Chan -212 Convenience Goods Trade Area, and Chan -212 Convenience Goods Trade Area Communities ' 10 Household Projections; 2014 to 2025.................................................................21 Metro Area, Southwest Growth Corridor, Chan -212 Shopping Goods Trade Area Communities, and City of Chanhassen Residential Building ' 11 Permits; 1996 to 2013..........................................................................................22 Metro Area, Southwest Growth Corridor, Chan -212 Shopping Goods Trade Area, and Chan -212 Shopping Goods Trade Area Communities ' Household Projections; 2014 to 2025.................................................................22 12 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Population and Household Growth Trends 2000 and 2010 Census; 2014 and 2019 Estimated..............................................26 iii 1 ' Table 1 I I 1 1 I LIST OF TABLES (continued) Page 13 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Average and Median Household Income 2000 and 2010 Census; 2014 and 2019 Estimated..............................................27 14 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Household Income Distribution 2000 and 2010 Census; 2014 and 2019 Estimated..............................................................27 15 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Educational Attainment 2000 and 2010 Census; 2014 and 2019 Estimated....................................................................................29 16 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: 2014 Employment by Industry ..............................30 17 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: 2014 Employment by Occupation .........................30 18 Chan -212 Convenience Goods Trade Area Demographic and Income Snapshot ... 33 19 Chan -212 Shopping Goods Trade Area Demographic and Income Snapshot ......... 34 20 Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA Demographic and Income Snapshot ............................35 21 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas Retail Purchasing Power: 2012, 2015, 2020, and 2025 .................................................32 22 Chanhassen Retail and Services Sales: 2002, 2007, and 2012 Estimated ...............36 23 Chanhassen Market Share; 2012..............................................................................37 24 Chan -212 Trade Areas Market Share and Trade Area Sales...................................39 25 Chan -212 Shopping Center Retail Purchasing Power, Market Share, and Sales Potential; 2015 by Merchandise Category ..........................................................40 26 Chan -212 Shopping Center Retail Sales Potential and Supportable Space; 2015...41 27 Chan -212 Shopping Goods Supportable GLA by Merchandise Category ..............42 28 Chan -212 Shopping Goods Sales Potential by Merchandise Category ...................45 I iv LIST OF MAPS t May Subject Page ' i Chan -212 Site.......................................................................................................... vii ii Chan -212 Shopping Goods Trade Area..................................................................viii iii Chan -212 Shopping Goods Trade Area Estimated 2019 Household Income: Percent Above $100,000.....................................................................................ix 1 Chan -212 Site............................................................................................................3 ' 2 Chan -212 Site and Southwest Growth Corridor.......................................................4 3 Competitive Shopping Areas....................................................................................6 ' 4 Chanhassen Retail Nodes..........................................................................................7 5 Chan -212 Convenience Goods Trade Area.............................................................24 ' 6 Chan -212 Shopping Goods Trade Area...................................................................25 7 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas 2019 Estimated Household Income: Percent above $100,000 .....................................28 1 1 1 ' v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Chan -212 is strategically located at an interchange on Highway 212, a new freeway in the southwest Minneapolis -St. Paul Metropolitan Area. Factors that support retail development of this 92 -acre site include: ' ♦ Chan -212 trade area population of 407,361 in 2014, which is expected to increase to 438,533 in 2019, an annual growth rate of 1.49 percent. ♦ Chan -212 trade area households grew at an annual rate of 1.94 percent between 2000 and 2010. During a slow growth period caused by the great recession, household growth ' averaged 1.0 percent annually. ♦ Households are expected to increase at an annual growth rate of 1.5 percent from 157,810 in 2014 to 169,997 in 2019. ♦ The Chan -212 trade area includes Carver and Scott counties, the two fastest growing ' counties in Minnesota. Between 2010 and 2013, population in Carver and Scott counties grew at annual rates of 1.6 and 1.8 percent, respectively. ' ♦ Chan -212 trade area average household income of $103,006 in 2014 is 20 percent above the Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA average household income of $85,611 and 41 percent above the United States average of $72,869. ' ♦ Chan -212 trade area median household income of $83,841 in 2014 is 55 percent above the national median household income of $53,958. ' ♦ Chan -212 trade area average household income is expected to increase to $110,603 in 2019, while median household income is expected to rise to $91,761. ♦ In 2014, 60,100 households (38.1 percent) are estimated to have household income above $100,000 and is expected to increase to 71,000 (41.8 percent) in 2019. One-quarter of the households (42,113) are expected to have incomes above $150,000 in 2019. ♦ Families comprise 70 percent of all households in 2014 compared to 64.7 percent in the Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA and 66.6 percent in the United States. ♦ Chan -212 trade area population age 25 plus is well educated with 30.4 and 13.1 percent ' that hold college and graduate degrees, respectively. This is well above the United States rates of 20.8 and 12.2 percent, respectively. ' ♦ Chan -212 trade area population in 2014 is 89.9 percent Caucasian followed by Asian/Pacific Islander (4.0 percent), African American (2.3 percent), Native American (0.4 percent), and Other (3.4 percent). Hispanic (any race) is 4.3 percent. ' Chan -212 trade area's many economic attributes, population, and upper income households provide support for retail stores, restaurants, and services. Key trade area demographics are contained on the following pages. Demographic comparisons are also provided for the Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA. ' vi ' Chan -212 Location ' Chan -212 is centrally located in Chanhassen, Minnesota, one of the fastest growing cities in the Minneapolis -St. Paul Metropolitan Area. The 92 -acre site, shown on Map i, occupies the northwest quadrant of the interchange of Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard. The westbound ' exit ramp connects to the site's main entrance street. The eastbound exit ramp is a short distance to the south. Highway 212 is a new freeway connecting southwest Minnesota with the metro area. Highway 212 traffic counts were 41,500 in 2012, a 14 percent increase from 36,500 in 2010. [1 I 1 1 Map i CHAN-212 SITE ' Chanhassen is an ideal location for a major retail development. The city's average household income is $131,021 in 2014, which is projected to increase to $141,957 in 2019. Median household ' income of $107,251 is double the United States median household income of $53,958. Two-thirds of Chanhassen households have incomes above $75,000 and 54.2 percent have ' incomes above $100,000. One-third of the households have incomes above $150,000. Chanhassen's adult population is well educated with 59.0 percent having a college or graduate degree. ' Money Magazine ranked Chanhassen 4a' in its Best Place to Live list in 2013. ' vii I 1 1 Map ii CHAN-212 SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREA _ w namr tRplFrtld •� - (Xseo c , t akn P"W. Rocktad averlyCmraren P G) Il ::tn�, VMIII IndepdM FI)ara:N LmdentaM Bbti,eit Lake Lillian Ce Mills - r- Mlnrtltristd ,.a St SR+er Lake i;ly HW[Nnspri LWn FrIDrie Mayer r.Ic;COtd f! VKtatla i p�� Wd[Onu OFKn P:di: i2 -� a" I Cl.S, fd9Bn v ,�alr�p�a Carvcr SINk.P- AFPIe Valkv 1 J Ria I. fWaIngtor 1110 0 :Norton _d _ ENw Nut Fri Henderson Le Sacvr Lcnsnale-- '� latayh0e nlontgomer; �CHAN-211 T Dom" GnRe Evan N-ag�.f��/ rade Area St t* a 0e,r nd O CHAN-212 SAe iourm: Scan/US, Inc. and McComb Group, Ltd Chan -212 retailers are expected to attract most of their sales from the Shopping Goods trade area. Population is expected to increase from 407,361 in 2014 to 438,533 in 2019. Trade area households are expected to increase from 157,810 in 2014 to 169,997 in 2019, an annual growth rate of 1.5 percent. Table i CHAN-212 CONVENIENCE GOODS AND SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREAS, AND MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL MSA: POPULATION AND HOUSEBOID GROWTH TRENDS 2000 AND 2010 CENSUS; 2014 AND 2019 ESTIMATED ' Trade Areas Minneapolis - Convenience Shopping Year Goods Goods St. Paul M SA POPULATION 2000 108,340 333,532 2,968,808 ' 2010 134,614 394,528 3,279,833 2014E 139,366 407,361 3,361,394 2019E 156,825 438,533 3,510,623 Annual Growth Rate ' 2000-10 2.20 % 1.69 % 1.00 % 2010-14 0.87 0.80 0.62 2014-19 2.39 1.49 0.87 ' HOUSEHOLDS 2000 38,921 125,159 1,136,615 2010 50,156 151,732 1,272,677 ' 2014E 2019E 52,373 59,190 157,810 169,997 1,316,673 1,380,185 Annual Growth Rate 2000-10 2.57 % 1.94 % 1.14 % ' 2010-14 2014-19 1.09 2.48 0.99 1.50 0.85 0.95 E Estimated. Source-. S.r,MS and McComb Gmup, Ltd. ' viii Map iii CHAN-212 SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREA ESTIMATED 2019 HOUSEHOLD INCOME: PERCENT ABOVE $100,000 Average 2014 household income is $103,006 and is expected to increase to $110,603 in 2019. Households with incomes above $100,000 in 2019 are distributed throughout the trade area with higher concentrations in the northeast portion. Table ii CHAN-212 CONVENIENCE GOODS AND SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREAS AND MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL MSA: AVERAGE AND MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME 2000 AND 2010 CENSUS; 2014 AND 2019 ESTIMATED E: Estimated. Source: McComb Group. Ltd lx Trade Area Convenience Shopping Minneapolis - Goods Goods St. Paul M SA Average Household Income 2000 $ 92,335 $ 82,151 $ 67,906 2010 106,700 96,786 80,346 2014E 113,852 103,006 85,611 2019E 123,093 110,603 91,814 Median Household Income 2000 S 74,242 $ 65,325 S 54,202 2010 84,104 76,146 62,518 2014E 93,092 83,841 66,941 2019E 102,347 91,761 71,838 E: Estimated. Source: McComb Group. Ltd lx ' Households with incomes above $100,000 in 2014 were 43.7 percent for the Convenience Goods trade area and 38.1 percent for the Shopping Goods trade area. Estimates show these proportions increasing through 2019 when it is estimated that over 47 percent of the Convenience Goods trade ' area households will have incomes above $100,000. Table iii ' CHAN-212 CONVENIENCE GOODS AND SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREAS AND MINNEAPOLLS-ST. PAULMSA. HOUSEHOLD INCOME DISTRmUTION 2000 AND 2010 CENSUS; 2014 AND 2019 ESTIMATED Trade Area ' Convenience Shopping Minneapolis - Goods Goods St. Paul MSA Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent ' Households shove $75,000 2000 18,534 47.6 % 48,497 38.7 % 357,430 31.4 % 2010 27,187 54.2 73,789 48.6 524,039 41.2 ' 2014E 2019E 29,925 36,387 57.1 61.5 81,683 96,362 81.8 56.7 580,354 673,744 44.1 48.8 Households above $100,000 2000 11,614 29.8 % 28,848 23.0 % 191,856 16.9 % 2010 19,360 38.6 50,234 23.1 337,204 26.5 ' 2014E 22,872 43.7 60,102 38.1 405,039 30.8 2019E 28,033 47.4 71,104 41.8 472,714 34.3 Households shove $150,000 ' 2000 4,766 12.2 % 12,257 9.8 % 66,951 5.9 % 2010 9,633 19.2 23,046 15.2 137,166 10.8 2014E 13,061 24.9 31,857 20.2 194,563 14.8 ' 2019E 17,672 29.9 42,113 24.8 258,648 18.7 E: EsOmated. Source: McComb Group. Ltd. Educational Attainment Adult residents of the Chan -212 Convenience Goods trade area are highly educated with 52.7 percent holding either a college or graduate degree in 2014. This educated pattern extends to the Shopping Goods trade area where 43.5 percent held college or graduate degrees. Table iv ' CHAN-212 CONVENIENCEGOODS AND SHOPPING GOODS TRADEAREAS AND MINNEAPOMST. PAUL MSA EDUCATIONAL ATEAINMENT; 2000 AND 2010 CENSUS; 2014 AND 2019 ESTIMATED t Attainment 2000 Number Percent 2010 Number Percent 2014 Number E 2019 E Percent Number Percent CONVENIENCE GOODS TRADE AREA No College 12,236 19.2 % 14,538 17.5 % 15,046 17.4 % 16,898 17.4 % Some College/2 yr. Degree College Graduate 20,308 31.9 22,875 35.9 24,734 30,371 29.7 36.5 25,840 31,280 29.9 28,904 36.2 35,278 29.8 36.4 Graduate School 8,237 119 13,620 16.4 14,233 16.5 15,924 16.4 SHOPPING GOODS TRADEAREA No College 53,206 26.9 % 59,311 23.8 % 60,948 23.6 % 63,627 23.6 % ' Some College/2 yr. Degree 65,983 333 81,035 32.6 84,534 32.8 88,245 32.7 College Graduate 57,206 28.9 76,167 30.6 78,417 30.4 82,462 30.6 Graduate School 21,689 10.9 32,293 13.0 33,832 13.1 35,283 13.1 ' MNNEAPOLISST. PAUL MSA No College 483,289 28.1 % 507,695 25.3 % 518,016 25.3 % 546,728 252 % Some College/2 yr. Degree 606,358 35.2 679,794 33.9 694,199 33.9 733,140 33.8 College Graduate 440,341 25.6 550,877 27.5 563,878 27.5 596,216 27.5 Graduate School 192,249 112 268,265 13.4 274,608 13.4 290,351 13A ' N/A Not Available or Not Applicable. E: F9iauaed Solan: U.S Cetuu Sc./US aad McComb Group, Ltd ' x ' Chan -212 Sales Potential The Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods trade areas have the potential to support more gross leasable area (GLA) than can be accommodated at the proposed development. This ' creates the enviable situation where the developer can focus the center's retail stores on its core customer. ' Estimated sales potential by retail store type are contained in the following tables. These estimates of sales potential are likely to be understated due to the high trade area household income. Also, ' there are likely to be a large proportion of high income and high asset households where there are few constraints on discretionary spending. ' Table v CHAN-212 SALES POTENTIAL BY MERCHANDISE CATEGORY t(In Thousands of Dollars) ' - Merchandise Category 2015 2020 2025 CONVENIENCE GOODS Food Stores Grocery Stores $ 43,280 $ 52,073 $ 62,220 ' Supermarkets 42,407 51,021 60,963 Convenience Food 874 1,052 1,257 ' Specialty Food Stores 1,530 1,841 2,200 Meat Markets 569 683 817 Baked Goods 131 158 189 ' Food Service Full -Service Restaurants $ 26,134 $ 31,795 $ 38,333 Limited Service Restaurants 16,575 20,166 24,313 ' Cafeterias 829 1,009 1,215 Snack & Beverage Places 4,420 5,378 6,484 Ice Cream& Soft Serve 553 673 810 ' Frozen Yogurt 55 68 81 Doughnut Shops 774 941 1,135 Bagel Shops 221 269 324 Coffee Shops Confectionery and Nut Stores 131 158 189 ' All Other Specialty Food Stores 219 263 314 1,075 Other Convenience Goals ' Drug & Proprietary Stores $ 9,421 $ 11,336 $ 13,544 Hardware 1,442 1,736 2,074 Liquor 7,432 8,942 10,684 ' Florist 547 658 786 Food/Health Supplement Stores 350 421 503 ' Food Service Full -Service Restaurants $ 26,134 $ 31,795 $ 38,333 Limited Service Restaurants 16,575 20,166 24,313 ' Cafeterias 829 1,009 1,215 Snack & Beverage Places 4,420 5,378 6,484 Ice Cream& Soft Serve 553 673 810 ' Frozen Yogurt 55 68 81 Doughnut Shops 774 941 1,135 Bagel Shops 221 269 324 Coffee Shops 1,879 2,285 2,755 ' Cookie Shops 55 68 81 Other Snack Shops 884 1,075 1,296 ' Gasoline Svs Stations/Cony Gas/Convenience Food Stores $ 9,266 $ 11,273 $ 13,591 ' xi I 1 Table v (continued) CHAN-212 SALES POTENTIAL BY MERCHANDISE CATEGORY (In Thousands of Dollars) Merchandise Category - - - - ' General Merchandise $ 28,455 Department Stores (loci. leased depts.) 8,963 Discount Stores 737 Department Stores ' Other General Merchandise Stores 10,456 Warehouse Clubs and Supercenters ' Dollar Stores Miscellaneous General Merchandise $ 10,589 Apparel & Accessories 36,208 Clothing Stores ' Mens and Boys 12,967 Womens Clothing Children's & Infant Family Clothing t Clothing Accessories Stores Other Clothing Stores ' Shoe Stores Men's Women's Children's & Infant Family Shoe Stores ' Athletic Footwear Furniture & Home Furnishings Furniture ' Floor Coverings Window Treatment Stores All Other Home Furnishings Stores ' Electronics & Appliances Stores Household Appliance Stores Radio, TV & Electronics Stores tComputers, Software, Music, & Other Electronics Other Shopping Goode Sporting Goods General line Sporting Goods Specialty line Sporting Goods Book Stores & Newsdealers Stationery Stores and Office Supply ' Musical Instrument & Supplies Jewelry Stores Hobby, Toy & Game ' Camera & Photographic Supply Gift, Novelty & Souvenirs Luggage & Leather Goods Sewing, Needlework & Piece Goods ' Per Stores Art Dealers Optical Goods Stores ' Pre -Recorded Tapes, Compact Discs Cosmetics, Beauty Supplies & Perfume All Other Health & Personal Care tX11 $ 54,121 35,360 $ 121,601 5,108 11,787 $ 2,211 9,823 4,543 22,837 1,351 3,684 $ 267 475 123 4,911 2,088 2020 $ 65,844 43,020 $ 147,941 6,215 14,340 $ 2,689 11,951 5,527 27,784 1,643 4,481 $ 324 577 149 5,975 2,540 2025 $ 79,384 51,867 $ 178,363 7,492 17,289 $ 3,241 14,408 6,664 33,497 1,981 5,403 $ 391 695 180 7,204 3,061 $ 19,399 $ 23,601 $ 28,455 7,367 8,963 10,805 737 896 1,080 8,595 10,456 12,607 $ 7,220 $ 8,783 $ 10,589 29,761 36,208 43,655 8,840 10,755 12,967 $ 16,207 6,631 9,577 4,543 6,016 2,701 9,108 4,420 1,841 5,035 613 2,333 4,420 737 3,684 701 3,011 5,157 $ 19,717 8,067 11,652 5,527 7,320 3,287 11,203 5,377 2,241 6,124 747 2,839 5,377 8% 4,481 853 3,663 6,273 $ 23,772 9,725 14,047 6,664 8,824 3,963 13,507 6,484 2,701 7,384 900 3,421 6,484 1,080 5,403 1,028 4,416 7,564 1 1 1 1 2025 $ 46,748 3,157 3,754 10,692 $ 7,337 5,545 $ 2,067 151 134 2% $ 1,771 $ 1,996 802 2,999 342 $ 318 752 $ 7,333 $ 35,772 7,985 1,153 1,579 1,779 2,981 Table v (continued) CHAN-212 SALES POTENTIAL BY MERCHANDISE CATEGORY (In 7bousands of Dollars) Merchandise Category 2015 2020 OTHER RETAIL STORES Building Materials & Garden Supplies Building Materials & Supplies Stores Home Centers $ 31,871 $ 38,775 Paint, Glass & Wallpaper 2,152 2,618 Lawn & Carden Equipment Outdoor PowerFAuipment 2,559 3,114 Retail Nurseries, Lawn &Garden 7,289 8,868 Motor Vehicles & Parts Dealers Auto Parts & Accessories Stores $ 5,002 $ 6,085 Tire Dealers 3,780 4,599 SERVICES Personal Care Services Beauty Shops $ 3,056 $ 1,731 Nail Salons 223 126 Diet & Weight Reducing Services 198 112 Other Persona) Care Services 439 248 Drycleaning & Laundry Services Drycleaning & Laundry Services $ 655 $ 1,482 Other Personal Services Child Day Care Services $ 1,475 $ 1,671 Photographic Studios 593 671 Veterinarian Services 2,216 2,509 Pet Care 254 287 Rental and Leasing Formalwear and Costume Renta) $ 176 $ 266 Home Health Equipment Rental 416 629 Recreation Physical Fitness Facilites $ 5,420 $ 6,138 Health Care Offices of Physicians Offices of Physicians $ 24,884 $ 29,939 Offices of Dentists 11,108 6,682 Offices of Chiropractors 1,604 %5 Offices of Optometrists 732 1,321 Offices of Mental Health Practitioners 825 1,489 Physical& Occupational Therapists 1,382 2,495 Source: McComb Group, Ltd 2025 $ 46,748 3,157 3,754 10,692 $ 7,337 5,545 $ 2,067 151 134 2% $ 1,771 $ 1,996 802 2,999 342 $ 318 752 $ 7,333 $ 35,772 7,985 1,153 1,579 1,779 2,981 I ' INTRODUCTION ' McComb Group, Ltd. was engaged by Carlston Commercial RE, LLC to conduct market analysis t for the proposed Chan -212 regional shopping center in the vicinity of Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard in Chanhassen. The objective of this engagement was to identify the demand for shopping center space at the proposed site. Work tasks conducted as part of this engagement are ' summarized below. ♦ The location of the proposed Chan -212 shopping center site was evaluated to determine its ' suitability for a shopping center for convenience goods and/or shopping goods retailers. Factors that were evaluated include, but were not limited to: ingress and egress, access, visibility, traffic counts, and relationship to adjacent uses. ♦ Shopping areas that would be competitive with the Chan -212 shopping center were identified and evaluated. Principal competitors were identified and evaluated including ' anchor stores, inline tenants, and market orientation. Future commercial developments that could affect development of the proposed center or its trade area were identified. ' ♦ Residential building permit trends from 1990 to 2013 in Chanhassen and other trade area communities were evaluated to determine historic residential development trends. Recent building permit trends were compared with historic trends in the Southwest Growth t Corridor to identify changes in building activity and market share. Future estimates of household growth were prepared for the period 2014 to 2025. This analysis determined if the housing slump affected the trade area share of Metropolitan Area housing development. The results of this analysis were incorporated in the trade area analysis. ♦ Trade areas for both convenience goods and shopping goods stores were delineated based ' on arterial road patterns, competitive shopping areas, and McComb Group experience. The economy of the trade area was analyzed to identify and quantify those factors that generate support for retail, food service, and service establishments. Factors that were evaluated ' include, but were not limited to: employment, population, households, building permits, and household income. Demographic characteristics and growth were evaluated for 2000, 2010, 2014, and 2019. Trade area growth trends were evaluated to determine residential ' growth potential for target years of 2015, 2020, and 2025. Retail, food service, and service purchasing power for trade area households were estimated using McComb Group's proprietary purchasing power model. ' ♦ Market demand for retail, food service, and services at the proposed Chan -212 shopping center were identified based on estimated trade area population and household growth ' taking into consideration competitive impacts, trade area demographics, and trade area purchasing power. Based on analysis of purchasing power, estimated market share, and current retail trends, future sales potential for stores to be located at the proposed center ' were estimated by business type. Estimates of retail, food service, and services supportable by sales potential were prepared for target years of 2015, 2020, and 2025. Sales potential was converted to square feet of gross leasable area (GLA) by type of business ' establishment, including supportable GLA by specific store types. 1 I 1 1 I 1 I This report contains the primary information needed to support the principal conclusions. However, in a report of this nature, it is not possible to include all of the information that was developed and evaluated. Any additional information will be furnished upon request. Report Purpose This report was prepared in accordance with our proposal dated February 7, 2014. This report was prepared with the understanding that the results of our work will be used by the client to evaluate retail potential for the proposed Chan -212 shopping center at the intersection of Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard in Chanhassen. Our report was prepared for that purpose and is subject to the following qualifications: Our analysis did not ascertain the legal and regulatory requirements applicable to this project including zoning, other state, and local government regulations, permits, and licenses. No effort was made to determine the possible effect on the proposed project of present or future federal, state, or local legislation, or any environmental or ecological matters. Our report and analysis was based on estimates, assumptions and other information developed from research of the market, knowledge of the industry and discussions with the client. Some assumptions inevitably will not materialize and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur; therefore, actual results achieved will vary from the analysis. • Our analysis did not evaluate management's effectiveness nor are we responsible for future marketing efforts and other management actions upon which actual results are dependent. Our report is intended solely for the purpose described above and should not be used for any other purpose without our prior written permission. Permission for other use of the report will be granted only upon meeting company standards for the proposed use. ' Chapter I CHAN-212 LOCATION ' Chan -212 is a proposed mixed-use development with the potential for a significant retail component located in Chanhassen, Minnesota. The 92 -acre site, shown on Map 1, occupies the northwest quadrant of the interchange of Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard. The westbound ' exit ramp connects to the site's main entrance street. The eastbound exit ramp is a short distance to the south. Highway 212 is a new freeway connecting southwest Minnesota with the Minneapolis -St. Paul Metropolitan Area. Highway 212 traffic counts were 41,500 in 2012, a 14 percent increase from 36,500 in 2010. 1 1 1 Map 1 CHAN-212 SITE Source: Google and McComb Group, Ltd. Residential development is located north of Lyman Boulevard and west of the site. Adjoining land to the south is vacant, as is the land east of Powers Boulevard. Chanhassen High School and several business parks are located northwest of the site. There is potential for additional residential development in the immediate vicinity of the Chan -212 site. Chanhassen is located in the southwest portion of the Minneapolis -St. Paul Metropolitan Area, as shown on Map 2 on the next page. Over the past 20 years, the southwest area has captured over I 1 1 1 1 22 percent of the Metropolitan Area residential growth. This growth is generally funneled in the area between Lake Minnetonka, a large lake that creates a physical barrier on the north, and the Minnesota River on the south. The portion of the southwest corridor north of the Minnesota River is served by four trunk highways that all pass through Chanhassen. North/south routes connect these trunk highways to the Chan -212 location. Map 2 CHAN-212 SITE AND SOUTHWEST GROWTH CORRIDOR k, Rrrnkyr Puk utlMela, � / � k . COr:Oran MOmxls VI • • • dY1U - N - HIIIVP (ntlepentlenre Gown Vat" r�r p. �r1♦ YJetertorvn ty apolis: fn.+ .... Ldma Le:[a Prairie MaM ihFPA Nina f ♦ Biscay �" s:L7 6kx,m.rx(en Ldma ' CdNP' 6u svf-e tl 1WMIROIi 1fa ._ v _ t' isle Green New Auburn Farm Mlington Uelle %ane I } w �.4 krtl Elko NLW �A, 1 HentlMn V;oy„er Crow1ACwiIMr� • I.s„rte, LonsGak Montgomery Regional Access Located at the interchange of Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard, Chan -212 has excellent regional access. Highway 212 is a new freeway that was completed in 2008 providing access from the east and west that did not previously exist. The major southwest area freeways (I-494, Crosstown, and Highway 169) all intersect with Highway 212 providing convenient routes to the shopping center site, which is only seven minutes from the intersection of I-494 and Highway 212. Trade area residents to the west have convenient access by way of several highways that serve major routes to the Twin Cities. Highway 7 serving the northwest portion of the trade area intersects with Powers Boulevard just north of Chanhassen. Highway 5 connects the western suburbs of Victoria, Waconia, and surrounding areas to Chanhassen and also intersect with Powers Boulevard approximately two miles north of the Chan -212 site. Highway 212, a major route to western Minnesota, is augmented by Highway 5/22, a diagonal route from the southwest portion of the trade area. Residents south of the Minnesota River will have convenient access by way of :l I 1 1 1 1 Highway 169, which connects to Highway 101 in Shakopee and Highway 41 in Chaska, which both intersect with Highway 212. The Highway 101 river crossing is being expanded to four lanes this year and improvements to Highway 41 are planned for the future. Traffic Counts Traffic counts on Highway 212 between 2008 and 2012 (the latest available) have been gradually increasing, as shown in Table 1. Traffic counts east and west of Powers Boulevard have been increasing. Traffic counts east of Powers Boulevard were 34,000 in 2008, and increased at a 5.1 percent annual growth rate to 41,500 average daily trips in 2012. Traffic counts west of Powers Boulevard were 29,000 in 2008, increasing to 34,000 in 2012, representing a 4.1 percent annual growth rate. Table 1 HIGHWAV 212 AND POWERS BOULEVARD AVERAGEDAR.YTRAFFK COUNTS; 2008, 2010, AND 2012 Location 2008 2010 2012 1Lghway212 West of Powers Blvd. 29,000 30,000 34,000 East of Powers Blvd. 34,000 36,500 41,500 West of Dell Road 36,500 46,000 46,000 East of Dell Road 39,500 49,000 51,000 Powers Bbd South ofMghway 212 N/A 5,800 6,500 North of Highway 212 N/A 7,400 8,600 source: Minnesota Department of Transportation and McComb Group, Ltd ' Traffic counts for Powers Boulevard south of Highway 212 show a significant increase south of Highway 212. Powers Boulevard south of Highway 212 had average daily traffic counts of 5,800 ' in 2010 and increased to 6,500 in 2012, an annual growth rate of 5.9 percent. Traffic counts on Powers Boulevard, north of Highway 212 were 7,400 in 2010 and increased to 8,600 in 2012, an annual growth rate of 7.8 percent. J 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Chapter II COMPETITIVE SHOPPING AREAS Shopping areas in the southwest Metropolitan Area include a variety of establishments offering convenience goods and shopping goods. Competitive shopping areas include community and regional shopping areas, as well as commercial areas in outlying communities. Community shopping areas are typically anchored by a supermarket and/or a shopping center. Regional shopping areas are anchored by a regional mall with additional supporting retail. Competitive shopping areas are shown on Map 3. Competition for convenience retail and services at Chan -212 will come from other convenience retailers in Chanhassen, Chaska, Victoria, Waconia, and Shakopee. Shopping goods retailers will be competitive with stores in the vicinity of Eden Prairie Center, Southdale/France Avenue in Edina, and Ridgedale Mall in Minnetonka. Map 3 COMPETITIVE SHOPPING AREAS ti ��..,.,.,,. Source: Scan/US, Inc. and McComb Group, Ltd 0 At W�w f • - Cn:iY Lt S:.e UUU Etlen F�elrir Celiier Mw i ljwR1y41/Rm111 rra' u;�y IDl %;.i, Cent,, CO n Chaska • ." "u ha:; Road r u _ _... ..__ S Hy 164 J Q O.�Ir�JINaJOMa -' �'�'-%F`` • a vx�xor _. '+�. __..� "t'7 �Cs—T't+v1 Source: Scan/US, Inc. and McComb Group, Ltd 0 I CHANHASSEN SHOPPING AREAS ' Downtown Chanhassen, the city's largest shopping area, is located about one mile north of the Chan -212 site, as shown on Map 4. Chanhassen has five other smaller, convenience -oriented shopping areas that serve nearby neighborhoods and are not competitive with Chan -212, as shown in Table 2 on the next page. Map 4 CHANHASSEN RETAIL NODES - Hwy al b Hwy? yjy t_ If -1- .�. - Hwy 5 8 Century Hwy 5 E Galpin HighwSy 5 & Highway 101 Hwy 212 ® Hwy 101 LL • _ r (Yti�af+<„ILc1.MI Nad<s � Oanbw<n R<tall Mea �\ Source: Scan/US, Inc. and McComb Group, Ltd ♦ Downtown Chanhassen is the city's dominant retail area with over 69 retail stores and 65 services. Downtown's tenant mix is oriented to food service (32 establishments) and convenience goods (14 stores). The convenience goods category is anchored by two supermarkets, Cub Foods and Byerly's, and a Walgreens. The food service category includes 11 full service restaurants and 16 limited service establishments. Target anchors the shopping goods category, which includes only two clothing stores. The other shopping goods category is dominated by locally -owned stores with OfficeMax being the only national retailer. Services in Downtown represent almost 50 percent of all Downtown Chanhassen establishments. Of the approximately 65 service establishments, the largest categories are medical, financial, personal care, and personal services. 7 L 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 F 11 1 11 Table 2 S UMMARY OF CHANHAS SEN RETAn. TENANT MIX BY AREA SUPER REGIONAL SHOPPING AREAS Three super regional shopping areas will be the primary competition for Chan -212 including Eden Prairie Center, Southdale, and Ridgedale. Each of these shopping centers have attracted other retail stores and services. Eden Prairie Center Area Eden Prairie Center and its adjacent shopping centers and retail stores are the nearest super regional shopping concentration, but not necessarily the most competitive. Eden Prairie Center has the 8 Other Retail Areas Downtown Hwy 41/ Hwy 5/ Hwy 5/ Hwy 5/ Hwy 212 Merchandise Catelgory Chanhassen Hwy 7 Galpin Rd Century Hwy 101 Hwy 101 CONVENIENCE GOODS Food Stores 3 1 Specialty Food Stores I Other Convenience Goods 10 4 1 1 1 1 Subtotal 14 5 1 1 1 1 FOOD SERVICE Full Service I I 1 Limited Service 16 4 4 1 2 Snacks & Beverage Places 4 I Cafeterias Drinking Places 1 Subtotal 32 6 0 4 1 2 CONVENIENCE/GAS 3 I 1 1 1 1 SHOPPING GOODS General Merchandise 1 2 Clothing and Accessories 2 1 Shoes Home Fumishingi 1 Home Appliances/Music 2 1 Other Shopping Goods 12 3 1 Subtotal 18 6 I o 1 0 OTHER STORES Building M arerials/Garden 1 M otor Vehicles & Parts 2 Subtotal 2 0 0 0 1 0 Total Retail 69 18 3 6 5 4 SERVICES Personal Care 12 5 3 Dry Cleaning/laundry 5 2 Personal Services 11 4 1 Recreation/Entertainment 6 I 1 Financial 15 I 14 5 Medical 16 5 7 3 Total Services 65 18 21 13 0 0 TOTAL 134 36 24 19 5 4 Source: McComb croup. Ltd. SUPER REGIONAL SHOPPING AREAS Three super regional shopping areas will be the primary competition for Chan -212 including Eden Prairie Center, Southdale, and Ridgedale. Each of these shopping centers have attracted other retail stores and services. Eden Prairie Center Area Eden Prairie Center and its adjacent shopping centers and retail stores are the nearest super regional shopping concentration, but not necessarily the most competitive. Eden Prairie Center has the 8 I ' largest number of retail stores (86) with 69 in the shopping goods category including 27 clothing and accessories stores and 26 other shopping goods stores, as shown in Table 3. Three nearby ' shopping areas contain large retail concentrations. These areas include the Eden Prairie periphery area, the area north of I-494, and the area south along Flying Cloud Drive. ' Table 3 S UMMARY OF EDEN PRAHUE CENTER AREA RErAn. TENANT MIX BY AREA ' Eden Prairie Eden Prairie North of South Merchandise Category Center Periphery 1-494 Flying Cloud CONVENIENCE GOODS Food Stores 1 1 ' Specialty Food Stores 1 2 Other Convenience Goods 1 7 1 Subtotal I 9 2 2 ' FOOD SERVICE Full Service 3 15 4 2 Limited Service 9 15 3 10 Snacks & Beverage Places 4 5 1 ' Cafeterias Drinking Places ' Subtotal CONVENIFNCUCAS 16 35 2 8 1 12 2 SHOPPING GOODS General Merchandise 5 3 ' Clothing and Accessories 27 4 Shoes 5 1 Home Furnishing; 2 2 2 ' Home Appliances/Music 6 3 1 Other Shopping Goods 26 13 7 7 Subtotal 69 25 10 10 OTHERSTORES ' Building M aterials/Garden 3 4 Motor Vehicles & Parts 2 4 1 Subtotal 0 5 8 1 ' Total Retail 86 76 29 27 S ERVICES Personal Care 5 14 4 5 ' Dry Cleaningll.aundry 3 1 Personal Services 5 9 4 1 Recreation/Entertainment 1 6 1 2 Financial 1 18 2 2 ' Medical 18 1 3 Total Services 12 68 13 13 ' TOTAL 98 144 42 40 Source: McComb Group, Ltd. ' ♦ Eden Prairie Center is located about six miles east of Chan -212 at the intersection of I- 494, Highway 212 and Highway 5. Eden Prairie Center (1,125,000 square feet) is anchored by JCPenney, Sears, Target, Von Maur, Kohl's, and an AMC Theater with 18 screens. ' Originally opened in 1976, Eden Prairie Center is the focal point of a major shopping node. 9 ' ♦ Eden Prairie Center Periphery area contains 76 retail stores of all sizes, including Cub ' Foods, Costco, Walmart, Best Buy, and Office Depot, along with a number of smaller retail establishments. Food service, with 35 establishments, represents almost half of the retail stores. The shopping goods category includes only four apparel stores and is dominated t primarily by hard goods stores. This area included 26 personal care/person services establishments and 18 financial institutions and 18 medical offices. ' ♦ North of I-494 area contains over 29 retail stores including Rainbow Foods, Eden Prairie Liquor, two automobile showrooms, Home Depot, and Menards, along with a number of auto -oriented retailers. ' ♦ South Flying Cloud Drive retail and service establishments are located south of Eden Prairie Center. There are approximately 27 retail stores along this route including Sports ' Authority, Home Goods, OfficeMax, and Michael's Arts & Crafts. The largest category is food service with 12 businesses including 10 limited service restaurants. ' Southdale Area Southdale Center opened in 1956 and became the focal point for a major retail node that extends ' south along France Avenue. The Southdale area is known for its quality shopping experiences, as well as freestanding stores. Southdale area tenant mix by area is shown in Table 4 and summarized below. ' ♦ Southdale Center (1,318,545 square feet) in Edina is anchored by Herberger's, Macy's, JCPenney, and an AMC 16 -screen cinema. In total, there are 102 retail and service ' establishments, including 89 retail and 13 service providers. Shopping goods is the largest retail category with 70 stores including 34 clothing and accessories and 20 other shopping goods stores. Food service included 16 establishments. Personal care and personal ' services are the largest service categories accounting for 12 businesses. ♦ Galleria, located south of Southdale, is a 417,000 square foot enclosed center that features upscale retail and service tenants. There are 39 establishments in the Galleria, which includes 36 retail stores and three service establishments. Shopping goods is the largest retail category with 28 retail merchants including 11 clothing and accessories stores, eight ' home famishing stores, seven other shopping goods, and two shoe stores. There are three service providers included in the Galleria, including a personal care, personal service, and financial service. ' ♦ Centennial Lakes shopping center is located three-quarters of a mile south of Southdale Center on France Avenue. This power center contains 27 retail and service establishments ' (17 retail and 10 service) and is anchored by Whole Foods, Joseph A. Banks, Old Navy, Home Goods, and OfficeMax. Shopping goods and food services are the largest retail categories and personal services is the largest service category. ' ♦ Other Southdale retail includes over 216 retail and service establishments located in the greater Southdale area encompassing an area around France Avenue from West 66d' Street ' on the north to I-494 on the south. There are approximately 85 retail establishments located in this area including such major retailers as SuperTarget, Byerly's, Cub Foods, Trader 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t Joe's, The Container Store, Cost Plus World Market, and Pier One, as well as numerous smaller retail establishments. Shopping goods is the largest category with 39 stores including 15 home furnishings and 16 other shopping goods offering primarily hard goods. Food service is a major category with 25 establishments. Personal care and personal services are represented by 23 businesses. Fairview Hospital, located north of Southdale, anchors a medical concentration that includes 82 providers. Table 4 SUMMARY OF S OUTHDAIE AREA RETAIL TENANT MDC BY AREA 11 Southdale Centennial Other M erchandise Category Center Galleria Lakes Southdale CONVENIENCE GOODS Food Stores 1 3 Specialty Food Stores 2 3 Other Convenience Goods 1 7 Subtotal 3 0 1 13 FOOD SERVICE Full Service 5 5 1 7 Limited Service 7 3 14 Snacks & Beverage Places 4 1 3 4 Cafeterias Drinking Places Subtotal 16 6 7 25 CONVENUNCF/GAS 4 SHOPPING GOODS GceeralMerchandise 4 2 Clothing and Accessories 34 11 2 4 Shoes 5 2 Home Furnishing; 2 8 I 15 Home Appliances/M uric 5 2 2 Other Shopping Goods 20 7 4 16 Subtotal 70 28 9 39 OTHERSTORES Building M aterials/Garden 2 3 Motor Vehicles & Parts 1 Subtotal 0 2 0 4 Total Retail 89 36 17 85 SERVICES Personal Care 7 1 2 12 Dry Cleaning/Laundry 2 Personal Services 5 1 5 9 Recreation/Entertainment 1 3 2 Financial 1 24 Medical 82 Total Services 13 3 10 131 TOTAL 102 39 27 216 Soume: McComb Group, Ltd. 11 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ridgedale Area Ridgedale Center, located in Minnetonka near the intersection of I-494 and I-394, opened in 1974. The Ridgedale shopping area includes a number of shopping areas including the area West of Plymouth Road, I-394 North Frontage Road, West Ridge Market, Ridgedale Periphery, and Bonaventure Mall. These retail areas have developed due to the regional draw of Ridgedale Center. Each of these competitive retail areas is summarized in Table 5 and described below: Ridgedale Center (1,044,000 square feet) is anchored by Macy's, Sears, and JCPenney department stores. In total, it contains over 116 retail and service establishments, with 106 (91 percent) of those establishments being retail orientated. Shopping goods is the largest category for Ridgedale Center with 90 stores including 45 clothing and accessories stores and 23 other shopping goods stores, followed by food services with 13 establishments. Services at Ridgedale Center include nine personal care/personal services. Ridgedale Center recently announced renovation plans that include two phases. The first phase is currently under construction and includes an 80,000 -square -foot addition to the Macy's store on the north side of the mall. The second phase, which was recently approved, includes a new 142,000 square foot Nordstrom department store in the old Macy's Men's and Home space, as well as a two-story, 87,765 square foot addition to the mall, which will provide a connection to Nordstrom's. Completion of both phases of renovation are expected by fall of 2015. A third phase, which hasn't been finalized yet, envisions additional pads for food service establishments. ♦ West of Plymouth Road retail and service concentrations includes Ridgehaven Mall and various other retail facilities south of I-394. In total, this area has approximately 42 retail stores and 33 service establishments for a total of 75. Shopping goods is the largest retail category with 26 establishments. Major retailers in this area include Byerly's, Best Buy, SuperTarget, Slumberland Furniture, and Petco. The largest service categories include medical, personal services, and personal care, which together represent over 80 percent of the service establishments in this area. ♦ I-394 North Frontage Road retail area is located north of Ridgedale Center and north of I-394. In total, there are 45 retail and service establishments in this area: 33 retail and 12 service. Shopping goods (15 stores) and motor vehicles and parts (10 stores) are the largest retail categories and represent primarily hard goods retailers. Personal care, personal services, and medical represent over 80 percent of the services. Major retailers include Whole Foods, Pier One, Sports Authority, Office Depot, and Toys R Us/Babies R Us. ♦ West Ridge Market is located about one-half mile east of Ridgedale Center in the ' northwest quadrant of I-394 and Hopkins Crossroads. This power center has 16 retail establishments and four services. The largest retail category is shopping goods with 11 stores including Lands End, Bed Bath & Beyond, Dick's Sporting Goods, Michael's Arts ' & Crafts, Staples, Schmidt Music, and Shane Company. There are also two personal care services, one financial service provider, and a medical service provider in this area. 1 12 ' ♦ Ridgedale Periphery development includes businesses adjacent to the shopping center ' and along Ridgedale Drive. This area includes the YMCA, three banks, Hennepin County Library, Redstone Restaurant, Firestone tire dealer, and Sears Auto Center. ' ♦ Bonaventure Mall, located on an out lot of Ridgedale Center contains six retail establishments: two restaurants, Marshall's, DXL Menswear, JoAnn Fabrics, and Pearle Vision. Table 5 S IIMMARY OF RIDGEDAIE ARFA REFAILTENANT MIX BY ARFA COMPETITIVE COMMUNITY SHOPPING AREAS Shopping areas located in Shakopee, Chaska, Waconia and Victoria provide a lower level of competition for Chan -212. Locations of competitive community shopping areas are shown on Map 3. Characteristics of these shopping areas are described below. 13 Ridgedale West of I-394 North West Ridge Ridgedale Bonaventure Merchandise Category Center Plymouth Rd Frontage Rd Market Periphery Mall CONVENIENCE GOODS Food Stores 1 1 1 Specialty Food Stores 2 2 Other Convenience Goods 1 3 1 Subtotal 3 6 2 1 0 0 FOOD SERVICE FUJI Service 4 1 2 1 2 Limited Service 5 3 3 1 Snacks & Beverage Places 4 3 1 Caf ferias Drinking Places Subtotal 13 7 3 4 1 2 CONVENIFNCFIGAS SHOPPING GOODS General M erchandise 3 1 1 Clothing and Accessories 45 2 1 1 1 Shoes 7 3 Home Furnishing; 4 3 2 I Home Appliances/Music 8 5 2 1 Other Shopping Goods 23 12 10 8 2 Subtotal 90 26 IS 11 0 4 OTHERSTORES Building Materials/Garden 3 3 Motor Vehicles & Pans 10 1 Subtotal 0 3 13 0 1 0 Total Retail 106 42 33 16 2 6 SERVICES Personal Care 4 8 3 2 Dry Cleaning/Laundry 1 Personal Services 5 9 3 Recreation/Entertainment I I Financial 5 1 1 3 Medical 1 9 5 1 Total Services 10 33 12 4 4 0 TOTAL 116 75 45 20 6 6 source: ttocome Gror.p, LW. COMPETITIVE COMMUNITY SHOPPING AREAS Shopping areas located in Shakopee, Chaska, Waconia and Victoria provide a lower level of competition for Chan -212. Locations of competitive community shopping areas are shown on Map 3. Characteristics of these shopping areas are described below. 13 I ' Shakopee ' Shakopee is a rapidly growing Scott County community that lies south of the Chan -212 site south of the Minnesota River. Access to Chan -212 from the Shakopee area is provided by two primary river crossings: Highway 41 through Downtown Chaska and Highway 101 from Downtown ' Shakopee. There are several retail areas in Shakopee scattered along the various highways, as shown in Table 6. ' ♦ Downtown Shakopee is the city's central business district and has 34 retail stores and 44 services. Downtown Shakopee has a large concentration of shopping goods stores (15) including the city's only clothing stores. Other shopping goods is the largest retail category followed by food service (eight) and convenience goods (six). Downtown Shakopee is service-oriented with approximately 44 service establishments with the largest categories being medical services (14), financial services (13), and personal ' care/personal services (10). Downtown Shakopee's retail and service establishments are primarily locally -owned and characteristic of an older city. ' ♦ Highway 101 is an older, highway shopping area extending east from the downtown area with 21 retail stores and two service establishments. These businesses are primarily auto -oriented. The largest categories are food service with 11 establishments and motor vehicles and parts with five establishments. ' ♦ Highway 169 retail areas have developed recently in response to residential growth that occurred in Scott County following opening of the Bloomington Ferry Bridge and Highway 169 Bypass. There are two major retail concentration areas along Highway ' 169 --Marschall Rd and CSAH 83. These two retail concentrations are located on the south side of Shakopee and include a large group of major retail stores including Target, Cub Foods, Kohl's, and Lowe's. In total, there are approximately 59 retail stores and ' 43 service establishments, making it the largest retail concentration in Shakopee. Dominant retail categories include 21 food services including 14 limited service, shopping goods with 18 stores, and nine convenience goods retailers. Significant service categories include 13 financial services, 12 personal care/personal services, and nine medical offices. ' ♦ Marschall Road, a north/south connector route between Highway 101 and Highway 169, contains a number of convenience retail and service establishments. Services represent almost 75 percent of all establishments in this area with approximately 40 ' service establishments. Major categories include financial services (15), personal care/personal services (13), and 10 medical offices. There are 14 retail stores with the largest category being food service. ' ♦ South Bridge Crossing is a 500,000 square foot, open-air, power center located south of Highway 169 at CSAH 18. This retail node is anchored by Sam's Club, Walmart, ' Home Depot, Best Buy, Michael's Arts & Crafts, Pier One, and PetSmart. This retail area has 30 retail establishments. The one dozen food service establishments include 11 limited service outlets. There are also 11 service establishments within this area ' with medical and personal care being the largest service categories. 14 11 1 u 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 ♦ Town Square, located southeast of Downtown, is Shakopee's oldest shopping center. This center, anchored by Marcus Cinema, has struggled to maintain its retail presence. Nine retail and service establishments include GNC, Anytime Fitness, Goodwill, and Dollar General, along with various other retail and service establishments. Shakopee's retail areas are anchored by supermarkets, discount stores, home centers, and a limited number of category killers. Table 6 SUMMARY OF SHAKOPEE RETAIL TENANT MIX BY AREA 15 Downtown Marschall Southbridge Town Merchandise Catelpry Shakopee Hwy 101 Hwy 169 Road Crossing Square CONVENIENCE GOODS Food Stores 1 Specialty Food Stores 2 3 1 Other Convenience Goods 4 1 5 2 2 1 Subtotal 6 1 9 3 2 1 FOOD SERVICE Full Service 3 4 5 1 1 Limited Service 2 6 14 4 8 Snacks & Beverage Places 1 2 3 1 Cafeterias Drinking Places 3 Subtotal 8 11 21 5 12 1 CONVENIENCE/GAS 2 2 5 1 2 SHOPPING GOODS General Merchandise 2 2 1 Clothing and Accessories 2 Shoes 1 Home Furnishings 1 1 4 1 Home Appliances/Music 2 2 2 Other Shopping Goods to 1 9 1 6 2 Subtotal 15 2 18 1 11 3 OTHERSTORES Building M aterials/Garden 1 2 I 1 M otor vehicles & Parts 2 5 4 3 2 Subtotal 3 5 6 4 3 0 Total Retail 34 21 59 14 30 5 SERVICES Personal Care 3 9 6 3 1 Dry Cleaninglaundry 2 1 1 1 Personal Services 5 2 6 1 Recreation/Entertainment 3 1 2 Automotive Services 7 2 6 1 Financial 13 13 15 3 Medical 14 9 10 4 Total Services 44 2 43 40 11 4 TOTAL 78 23 102 54 41 9 Source: McCm b Group, Ltd. 15 ' Chaska 1 1 Chaska, located west of Chanhassen, has two principal retail nodes --Downtown Chaska and Highway 41/Pioneer Trail. Each of these areas is summarized in Table 7 and described below. ♦ Downtown Chaska has 36 retail stores and 42 service establishments. The eight convenience goods stores include Cooper's County Market, Walgreens, and Ace Hardware. Shopping goods are represented by 14 stores. Food service contains 13 establishments, nine of which are limited service. Major service categories include 18 financial services, 14 personal care/personal services, and nine medical practices. Downtown consists primarily of locally owned business establishments. Highway 41/Pioneer Trail retail area is located about three miles west of the Chan -212 site. This area is located about one mile north of the interchange of Highway 212 and Highway 41 and includes Chaska Commons and Jonathan Square Center. Major tenants include SuperTarget, Kohl's, Rainbow Foods, Home Depot, Petco, and Hazeltine Plaza. SuperValu recently announced that it was purchasing the Rainbow store and converting it to Cub Foods. The area's 28 retail stores include 13 food services and four convenience goods retailers. The relatively small group of services include nine personal care/personal services and seven medical practices including Lakeview Clinic and Chaska Health Care Center. Chaska retail areas contain a limited number of establishments that would be competitive with Chan -212. Victoria Victoria is a small, but rapidly growing community about five miles northwest of the Chan -212 site. It has a small commercial area with approximately 45 establishments, most of which are located along or just north of Highway 5. Victoria has 22 retail establishments that include two liquor stores, eight food services, two convenience/gasoline stores, along with 10 other retail establishments. The town's only supermarket closed recently. There are 23 service establishments, with financial services and medical services being the largest categories. Waconia Waconia is a community with a population of about 11,000 located 12 miles west of the Chan -212 site on Highway 5. Waconia has 61 retail stores and 68 service businesses located in two primary retail commercial areas --the older Downtown central business district and the more recently developed retail area along Highway 5 south of Downtown. ' ♦ Downtown Waconia has 22 retail stores and 38 service establishments. These include Waconia Theatre (six screens), 10 food services, nine shopping goods stores, 12 medical offices, 11 financial services, and 13 personal care/personal service establishments. ' ♦ Highway 5 retail area in Waconia has 39 retail stores including Target, Mackenthun's County Market, Walgreens, and Waconia Farm Supply, and 30 service establishments. ' Additional tenants include two hardware stores, two new car auto dealerships along with IVA I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 five other auto -oriented businesses, and 11 food services. Ridgeview Medical Center and Lakeview Clinic are also located in this area. These community shopping areas will be competitive primarily with convenience goods retailers at Chan -212. Table 7 SUMMARYOF CHASKA, VICTORIA, AND WACONIA RETAD.TENANT MIX BY AREA 17 Chaska Waconia Downtown Hwy 41/ Downtown Merchandise Category Chaska Pioneer Tr Victoria Waconia Hwy 5 CONVENIENCE GOODS Food Stores 1 1 1 Specialty Food Stores 3 1 Other Convenience Goods 4 3 4 1 6 Subtotal 8 4 4 2 7 FOOD SERVICE Full Service 4 5 4 5 5 Limited Service 8 7 3 3 4 Snacks & Beverage Places 1 1 2 2 Cafeterias Drinking Places 1 Subtotal 13 13 8 10 11 CONVENIENCE/GAS 1 1 2 4 SHOPPING GOODS General Merchandise 2 1 Clothing and Accessories 1 1 2 Shoes Home Furnishings 1 2 1 Home Appliances/Music 2 1 Other Shopping Goods 13 5 2 6 5 Subtotal 14 9 3 9 10 OTHERSTORES Building Materials/Garden 1 3 1 Motor vehicles & Parts 2 7 Subtotal 0 1 5 1 7 Total Retail 36 28 22 22 39 SERVICES Personal Care 8 5 3 6 6 Dry Cleaning/Laundry I 1 1 1 Personal Services 5 3 3 6 5 Recreation/Entertainment 1 2 3 2 1 Financial 18 3 8 11 10 Medical 9 7 5 12 8 Total Services 42 21 23 38 30 TOTAL 78 49 45 60 69 Source: McComb Group, Ltd. 17 ' SUMMARY ' Competition for Chan -212 ranges from community retail clusters to super regional shopping areas. The super regional shopping center competition and its proximity to Chan -212 are important. Ridgedale and Southdale, the preeminent super regional shopping centers, are 13 and 15 driving ' miles, respectively, from Chan -212. Eden Prairie Center is about seven driving miles from Chan - 212. The other super regional malls, excluding Mall of America, are about eight to nine miles apart, indicating that Chan -212 is further from its competitive regional malls than the existing ' malls are from each other. Community shopping areas in Chaska, Waconia, Victoria, and Shakopee will be competitive with ' convenience goods retailers at Chan -212. These community shopping areas are generally anchored by discount stores and supermarkets with less drawing power than the regional shopping areas. ' COMPETITIVE CHANGES ' Recently, SuperValu and three franchise holders announced plans to purchase 12 Rainbow Foods stores in the Metropolitan Area. Two of these Rainbow stores (Eden Prairie and Chaska) that are competitive with Chan -212 will be converted to Cub Foods. This acquisition may affect plans for a Cub Foods anchored neighborhood shopping center at CSAH 10 and Highway 212, about two miles from the Chaska Rainbow. 1 1 18 I ' Chapter III ' RESIDENTIAL GROWTH PROJECTIONS ' Demand for retail space at Chan -212 is dependent on future residential growth in each of the trade areas. McComb Group maintains a historical database of Seven -County Metropolitan Area (Metro Area) growth trends since 1970. This database demonstrates that the Metro Area has eight growth ' corridors that tend to capture roughly the same percent of household growth each year unless altered by a new freeway, river crossing, or similar event. These relationships provide a basis for estimating how household growth may occur in the future. This database was used to estimate ' future household growth from 2014 to 2025. Future household growth projections were prepared for two trade areas: Convenience Goods and ' Shopping Goods. Convenience goods are generally purchased close to home. Shopping goods include stores where comparison shopping between stores is common. Comparison shopping draws customers from a greater distance and trade areas are larger. ' Convenience Goods Trade Area The Chan -212 site is located in the Southwest Growth Corridor. Building permits for the Southwest Growth Corridor communities, Chanhassen's Convenience Goods trade area communities, and the City of Chanhassen were compared with Metro Area building permits for the period 1990 through 2013, as shown in Table 8. Annual Metro Area building permits ranged from 12,060 to 17,679 between 1991 and 1999. As ' the housing boom unfolded, building permits increased from 17,679 in 1999, peaked at 20,973 in 2003, which was followed by a decline to 4,028 in 2009 and a slight recovery to 5,014 units in 2010. Metro Area building permits increased to 10,260 in 2013. ' Southwest Growth Corridor market share of the Metro Area building permits has averaged 21.42 percent between 1990 and 2013. During the period 1990 to 1993, market share averaged 16.53 ' percent and increased to an average of 21.58 percent in the next six-year period. During the nine- year period 2000 through 2008, the Southwest Growth Corridor maintained an average market share of 23.68 percent. In 2009, market share rose to 32.08 percent in the Southwest Growth Corridor; however, market share has averaged 20.32 percent since 2009. Even though building permits have declined, the Southwest Growth Corridor has maintained a relatively consistent market share of Metro Area growth. Chan -212 Convenience Goods trade area communities include Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, Shorewood, Chaska, Carver, Victoria, and Shakopee. Building permits in these communities ' fluctuated between 1990 and 2013 with a low of 444 building permits in 2008 and a high of 2,888 building permits in 2003. Building permits increased significantly from 932 in 1991 to 1,450 in 1992, and gradually increased to a high of 2,888 in 2003. Between 2004 and 2006, trade area ' communities building permits began to decline. In 2007 building permits fell to 701, the lowest number of building permits since 1991. Since 2008, building permits have averaged 596 permits, with 2013 permits at 873. 1 19 Table 8 METRO AREA, SOUTHWEST GROWTH CORRIDOR, CHAN-212 CONVENIENCE GOODS TRADE AREA COMMUNTfIFS, AND CITY OF CHANHAS S EN RESIDENTIAL BURDING PERMITS; 1990 TO 2013 Source: U.S. Census and McComb Group, Ltd Chan -212 Convenience Goods trade area communities' market share of building permits have averaged 53.65 percent between 1990 and 2013, with a low of 37.06 percent in 2008 and a high of 61.59 percent in 2003. During the housing boom 2000-2006, trade area communities' market share averaged 52.86 percent. Since 2006, market share has averaged 46.84 percent. Market share rebounded to 56.32 percent. City of Chanhassen housing development was strong during the 1990-1995 period when market share averaged 20.28 percent. During the period 1996-2005, market share fluctuated in a downward trend and averaged 12.02 percent. Since then, market share has recovered to an average of 21.43 percent, slightly above the 20.28 percent market share of the early 1990s. This indicates a resurgence in residential development in Chanhassen. Future household growth projections from 2014 to 2025 for the Chan -212 Convenience Goods trade area are based on estimated future Southwest Growth Corridor communities' residential market share of Metro Area growth contained in Table 9. Future Metro Area households are shown in the fust column for 2014 through 2025. These estimates reflect a slowing growth rate that is anticipated by the State Demographer. Assuming that the Southwest Growth Corridor will capture 20 Convenience Goods SW Growth Corridor Trade Area Communities Chanhassen Metro Building Market Building Market Building Market Year Area Permits Share Permits Share Permits Share 1990 13,340 1,654 12.40 % 954 57.68 % 197 20.65 % 1991 12,060 2,057 17.06 932 45.31 191 20.49 1992 15,632 2,852 18.24 1,450 50.84 230 15.86 1993 15,882 2,927 18.43 1,633 55.79 267 16.35 1994 14,205 3,014 21.22 1,658 55.01 379 22.86 1995 13,956 3,072 22.01 1,875 61.04 478 25.49 1996 14,098 2,969 21.06 1,635 55.07 207 12.66 1997 13,234 2,982 22.53 1,663 55.77 274 16.48 1998 15,817 3,669 23.20 2,166 59.04 425 19.62 1999 17,679 3,436 19.44 2,001 58.24 275 13.74 2000 17,050 4,293 25.18 2,414 56.23 320 13.26 2001 16,788 3,998 23.81 2,226 55.68 229 10.29 2002 19,782 5,170 26.13 2,842 54.97 300 10.56 2003 20,973 4,689 22.36 2,888 61.59 396 13.71 2004 19,832 3,932 19.83 1,952 49.64 92 4.71 2005 11,514 3,335 28.96 1,618 48.52 84 5.19 2006 12,109 2,439 20.14 1,058 43.38 179 16.92 2007 8,039 1,712 21.30 701 40.95 169 24.11 2008 4,711 1,198 25.43 444 37.06 66 14.86 2009 4,028 1,292 32.08 738 57.12 99 13.41 2010 5,014 996 19.86 468 46.99 101 21.58 2011 3,875 919 23.72 475 51_69 148 31.16 2012 6,749 1,525 22.60 576 37.77 169 29.34 2013 10,260 1,550 15.11 873 56.32 175 20.05 Total 306,627 65,680 21.42 % 35,240 53.65 % 5,450 15.47 % Source: U.S. Census and McComb Group, Ltd Chan -212 Convenience Goods trade area communities' market share of building permits have averaged 53.65 percent between 1990 and 2013, with a low of 37.06 percent in 2008 and a high of 61.59 percent in 2003. During the housing boom 2000-2006, trade area communities' market share averaged 52.86 percent. Since 2006, market share has averaged 46.84 percent. Market share rebounded to 56.32 percent. City of Chanhassen housing development was strong during the 1990-1995 period when market share averaged 20.28 percent. During the period 1996-2005, market share fluctuated in a downward trend and averaged 12.02 percent. Since then, market share has recovered to an average of 21.43 percent, slightly above the 20.28 percent market share of the early 1990s. This indicates a resurgence in residential development in Chanhassen. Future household growth projections from 2014 to 2025 for the Chan -212 Convenience Goods trade area are based on estimated future Southwest Growth Corridor communities' residential market share of Metro Area growth contained in Table 9. Future Metro Area households are shown in the fust column for 2014 through 2025. These estimates reflect a slowing growth rate that is anticipated by the State Demographer. Assuming that the Southwest Growth Corridor will capture 20 I �l I 11 24.0 percent of the projected growth, similar to the past, the estimated annual household growth in 2015 would be 3,220 and 3,385 households in 2020. Household growth is expected to slow in each of the successive five-year periods. It is estimated that Chan -212 Convenience Goods trade area communities will capture 50 percent of the Southwest Growth Corridor residential growth in the initial seven-year period and then decline slightly to 49 percent in the later five-year period 2021-2025 as the trade area becomes more fully developed. Table 9 METRO AREA, SOUTHWEST GROWTH CORRIDOR, CHAN-212 CONVENIENCE GOODS TRADE AREA AND CHAN-212 CONVENHNCE GOODS TRADE AREA COMMUNITIES HOUSEHOLD PROJECTIONS; 2014 TO 2025 The Chan -212 Convenience Goods trade area encompasses about 83 percent of the households living in the trade area communities. In the future, the Chan -212 Convenience Goods trade area is estimated to capture 83.2 percent of the trade area household growth over the seven-year period, declining to 81 percent in 2021. This results in an estimated increase of 1,339 households in 2015 for a total of 53,712. Households are estimated to increase to 60,598 in 2020 and 66,383 in 2025. Shopping Goods Trade Area ' Shopping Goods trade area communities include Chanhassen and over 40 other communities including, Eden Prairie, Shakopee, Chaska, Prior Lake, Hutchinson, and Waconia. Building permits in these communities are summarized in Table 10. Because the trade area includes a number of communities outside of the Metro Area, building permit information for 1990 through 1995 was incomplete. The table begins with 1996. t Shopping Goods trade area communities' building permits increased from 2,706 in 1996 to 3,556 in 2000. During this period, market share averaged 86.96 percent. Between 2000 and 2007, building permits peaked at 4,989 in 2002 and declined to 1,288 in 2007, when the great recession ' began. Market share averaged 88.46 percent during this period. Since 2007, market share has averaged 74.03 percent. Trade area households increased by 26,573 between 2000 and 2010, which was 88.3 percent of the 30,107 household increase in the trade area communities. Since ' 2010, trade area households have represented 86.3 percent of household increase in the trade area communities. 1 21 Market Share Total Metro Area Southwest Trade Area Communities Trade Area Trade Area Year Households Increase @ 24.0% Percent Households Percent Households Household 2014 1,169,911 13,264 3,183 50.0 1,592 83.2 1,324 52,373 2015 1,183,326 13,415 3,220 50.0 1,610 83.2 1,339 53,712 2016 1,196,811 13,485 3,236 50.0 1,618 83.2 1,346 55,059 2017 1,210,447 13,636 3,273 50.0 1,636 83.2 1,361 56,420 2018 1,224,239 13,792 3,310 50.0 1,655 83.2 1,377 57,797 2019 1,238,188 13,949 3]48 50.0 1,674 83.2 1,393 59,190 2020 1,252,292 14,104 3,385 50.0 1,692 83.2 1,408 60,598 2021 1,264,213 11,921 2,861 49.0 1,402 81.0 1,136 61,733 2022 1,276,243 12,030 2,887 49.0 1,415 81.0 1,146 62,879 2023 1,288,388 12,145 2,915 49.0 1,428 81.0 1,157 64,036 2024 000,648 12,260 2,942 49.0 1,442 81.0 1,168 65,204 2025 013,020 12,372 2,969 49.0 1,455 81.0 1,179 66,383 156,373 18,619 15,334 Source: McComb GroW, LW. The Chan -212 Convenience Goods trade area encompasses about 83 percent of the households living in the trade area communities. In the future, the Chan -212 Convenience Goods trade area is estimated to capture 83.2 percent of the trade area household growth over the seven-year period, declining to 81 percent in 2021. This results in an estimated increase of 1,339 households in 2015 for a total of 53,712. Households are estimated to increase to 60,598 in 2020 and 66,383 in 2025. Shopping Goods Trade Area ' Shopping Goods trade area communities include Chanhassen and over 40 other communities including, Eden Prairie, Shakopee, Chaska, Prior Lake, Hutchinson, and Waconia. Building permits in these communities are summarized in Table 10. Because the trade area includes a number of communities outside of the Metro Area, building permit information for 1990 through 1995 was incomplete. The table begins with 1996. t Shopping Goods trade area communities' building permits increased from 2,706 in 1996 to 3,556 in 2000. During this period, market share averaged 86.96 percent. Between 2000 and 2007, building permits peaked at 4,989 in 2002 and declined to 1,288 in 2007, when the great recession ' began. Market share averaged 88.46 percent during this period. Since 2007, market share has averaged 74.03 percent. Trade area households increased by 26,573 between 2000 and 2010, which was 88.3 percent of the 30,107 household increase in the trade area communities. Since ' 2010, trade area households have represented 86.3 percent of household increase in the trade area communities. 1 21 ' Southwest Trade Area Communities Metro Area Growth Corridor Year Table 10 Increase Percent Households 2014 METRO AREA, SOUTHWEST GROWTH CORRIDOR, 13,264 24.0 % 3,183 AND CHAN-212 SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREA 1,183326 13,415 24.0 RES IDENTIALBURDING PERMITS; 1996 TO 2013 1,196,811 t 24.0 3,236 2017 Shopping Goods 13,636 24.0 3,273 SW Growth Corridor Trade Area Communities 13,792 24.0 Metro Building Market Building Market 24.0 Year Area Permits Share Permits Share 3,385 1996 14,098 2,969 21.06 % 2,706 91.14 % 2022 1997 13,234 2,982 22.53 2,565 86.02 1,288,388 1998 15,817 3,669 23.20 3,165 86.26 ' 1999 17,679 3,436 19.44 3,043 88.56 24.0 2000 17,050 4,293 25.18 3,556 82.83 37,530 2001 16,788 3,998 23.81 3,704 92.65 ' 2002 19,782 5,170 26.13 4,989 96.50 2003 20,973 4,689 22.36 4,395 93.73 2004 19,832 3,932 19.83 3,617 91.99 2005 11,514 3,335 28.96 3,000 89.96 ' 2006 12,109 2,439 20.14 1,931 79.17 2007 8,039 1,712 21.30 1,288 75.23 ' 2008 2009 4,711 4,028 1,198 25.43 1,292 32.08 715 968 59.68 74.92 2010 5,014 996 19.86 847 85.04 2011 3,875 919 23.72 693 75.41 2012 6,749 1,525 22.60 982 64.39 ' 2013 10,260 1,550 15.11 1,313 84.71 Total 221,552 50,104 22.62 % 43,477 86.77 % ' Source: U.S. Census and McComb Croup, Ltd. Future household growth projections from 2014 to 2025 for the Chan -212 Shopping Goods trade ' area are based on estimated future Southwest Growth Corridor residential market share of Metro Area growth contained in Table 11. I 1 1 1 Table 11 METRO AREA, SOUTHWEST GROWTH CORRIDOR CHAN-212 SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREA COMMUNTTDS, AND CHAN-212 SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREA HOUSEHOLD PROJECTIONS; 2014 TO 2025 Shopping Goods Southwest Trade Area Communities Metro Area Growth Corridor Year Households Increase Percent Households 2014 1,169,911 13,264 24.0 % 3,183 2015 1,183326 13,415 24.0 3,220 2016 1,196,811 13,485 24.0 3,236 2017 1,210,447 13,636 24.0 3,273 2018 1,224,239 13,792 24.0 3,310 2019 1,238,188 13,949 24.0 3,348 2020 1,252,292 14,104 24.0 3,385 2021 1,264,213 11,921 24.0 2,861 2022 1,276,243 12,030 24.0 2,887 2023 1,288,388 12,145 24.0 2,915 2024 1,300,648 12,260 24.0 2,942 2025 1,313,020 12,372 24.0 2,969 Total 156,373 37,530 Sarco: McCarM Gmp. LW. Shopping Goods Total Trade Area Communities Trade Area Trade Area percent Households Percent Households Household 85.5 % 2,722 87.0 % 2,368 157,810 85.5 2,753 87.0 2,395 16OA5 85.5 2,767 87.0 2,407 162,612 85.5 2,798 87.0 2,434 165,047 85.5 2,830 87.0 2,462 167,509 85.5 2,862 87.0 2,488 169,997 85.5 2,894 87.0 2,520 172,517 85.5 2,446 87.0 2,128 174,645 85.5 2,469 87.0 2,148 176,793 85.5 2,492 87.0 2,168 178,961 85.5 2,516 87.0 2,189 181,150 85.5 2,539 87.0 2,209 183,358 32,088 27,916 22 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ll I 1 Future Metro Area households are shown in the first column for 2014 through 2025. These estimates reflect a slowing growth rate that is anticipated by the State Demographer. Assuming that the Southwest Growth Corridor will capture 24.0 percent of the projected growth, similar to the past, the estimated annual household growth in 2015 would be 3,220 and 3,385 households in 2020. Household growth is expected to slow in the next five-year period. It is estimated that Chan -212 Shopping Goods trade area communities will capture 85.5 percent of the Southwest Growth Corridor area residential growth over the next 10 years. The Chan -212 Shopping Goods trade area captures about 87 percent of the increased household growth in the trade area communities. In the future, the Chas -212 Shopping Goods trade area is estimated to capture 87.0 percent of the trade area household growth over the 10 -year period. This results in an estimated increase of 2,395 households in 2015 for a total of 160,205. Households are estimated to increase to 172,517 in 2020 and 183,358 in 2025. Chapter IV CHAN-212 TRADE AREAS t ' Two trade areas were delineated for Chan -212. The Convenience Goods trade area reflects the area that convenience goods retailers, such as a supermarket, would draw most of their customers. The Shopping Goods trade area represents the area a regional shopping center or lifestyle center ' would draw most of their customers. These trade areas were delineated by McComb Group based on the location of competitive retail areas, arterial road networks, natural boundaries, and previous experience. ' The Convenience Goods trade area, shown on Map 5, includes Chanhassen, Chaska, and portions of Eden Prairie, Shakopee, Carver, Victoria, Shorewood, Minnetonka, and Excelsior, along with portions of Jackson, Louisville, Dahlgren, and Laketown Townships. This trade area extends north to Lake Minnetonka, east to Highway 212 and I-494, south to Highway 41 in Shakopee, and west to Laketown Road in Laketown Township. The Convenience Goods trade area covers ' approximately 88 square miles centered on Chanhassen. 1 Map 5 CHAN-212 CONVENIENCE GOODS TRADE AREA Source: Scan/US, Inc. and McComb Group, Ltd. PZII 11 11 I The Shopping Goods trade area covers the southwest Metropolitan Area, as shown on Map 6, extending 60 miles west and encompassing over 2,100 square miles. General boundaries are six miles north of Highway 7, east to Highway 100 in Bloomington/Edina, south to Highway 22 just south of LeSueur, and west five miles from Highway 4 in Hector. Map 6 CHAN-212 SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREA -.�`r I .I r Rinyacnn 91tak� SC Nithx; t^y- DaYw L C:+cn RnP�s Harmer AtwaW "�...... Llthkid NapE f,«nrp SDrlrg Lek_- Farb. 'Oa5e1- Ccka'c Roddocl �) - ftp'w+� _ Warey Htop 0irzi. ` -t.� •. ,rdependence Flymotth ' - � Wudernate Wayzata f� � �''e, � R. Dad Wnre�rista Hca / WF Poo �a Ncrdxa Height; Waccroz v 5t. F ra r � lhaiVl [Nan i cobw VdioKe �(. ApD�e Valey *9 Pros L' Coa, JJr�n Fan-inrton i w: nonM i LaoRon ..--Jlew'I Rand i Lafayette Dundas Derm Ne2tran St I .:. New Urn - Klkenny Source: Scan/US. Inc. and McComb Groun. Ltd Population and Households Population and household growth trends in Chan -212's trade areas and the Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA (MSA) are shown in Table 12. Since 2000, Chan -212 Convenience Goods trade area has been growing at a faster rate than both the Shopping Goods trade area and the MSA. Chan -212 Convenience Goods trade area population increased at an annual rate of 2.20 percent from 108,340 people in 2000 to 134,614 people in 2010. Convenience Goods trade area population growth rate dropped to less than one percent between 2010 and 2014 as a result of the recession and slower residential development. The growth rate is expected to increase to 2.39 percent by ' 2019, increasing trade area population to an estimated 156,825 people. Household growth for this trade area has been higher, with an annual growth rate of 2.57 percent annually from 2000 to 2010, increasing trade area households from 38,921 in 2000 to over 50,000 households by 2010. Estimates indicate an increase of 1.09 percent annually through 2014, increasing households to 52,373, with estimates for 2019 at 59,190 households for an annual growth rate of 2.48 percent. 1 25 I 1 1 1 11 H 1 Table 12 CHAN-212 CONVENIENCE GOODS AND SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREAS, AND MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL MSA: POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD GROWTH TRENDS 2000 AND 2010 CENSUS; 2014 AND 2019 ESTIMATED POPULATION 2000 2010 2014E 2019E Annual Growth Rate 2000-10 2010-14 2014-19 HOUSEHOLDS 2000 2010 2014E 2019E Annual Growth Rate 2000-10 2010-14 2014-19 E: Estimated. Source: Scan/US and McComb Group, Ltd. Trade Areas Convenience Shopping Minneapolis - Goods Goods St. Paul M SA 108,340 333,532 2,968,808 134,614 394,528 3,279,833 139,366 407,361 3,361,394 156,825 438,533 3,510,623 2.20 % 1.69 % 1.00 % 0.87 0.80 0.62 2.39 1.49 0.87 38,921 125,159 1,136,615 50,156 151,732 1,272,677 52,373 157,810 1,316,673 59,190 169,997 1,380,185 2.57 % 1.94 % 1.14 % 1.09 0.99 0.85 2.48 1.50 0.95 Chan -212 Shopping Goods trade area population and households, contained in Table 12, also includes the Convenience Goods trade area. Shopping Goods trade area population and households have been growing at a slower rate than the Convenience Goods trade area, but at a higher rate than the MSA. Shopping Goods trade area population for 2000 was 333,532 and increased to 394,528 by 2010, an annual growth rate of 1.69 percent. Trade area population rose to 407,361 by 2014, an increase of less than one percent from 2010 due to the recession and is expected to increase to 438,533 by 2019, an annual growth rate of 1.49 percent. Chan -212 Shopping Goods trade area households have been growing at faster rates. In 2000, Shopping Goods trade area households were 125,159 and increased to 151,732 by 2010, an annual increase of 1.94 percent. Estimates for 2014 indicate an increase to 157,810 households, further increasing to 169,997 by 2019, an annual increase of 1.50 percent. Household Income Average household income in Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods trade areas and the MSA is shown in Table 13. Average household income in the Convenience Goods trade area was $106,700 in 2010, compared to $96,786 in the Shopping Goods trade area and $80,346 in the MSA. It is estimated that average household incomes for these three areas will continue to increase through 2014, increasing Convenience Good trade area average household income to $113,852 and Shopping Goods trade area to $103,006. Further estimates show average household income increasing further to $123,093 in 2019 for the Convenience Goods trade area and $110,603 for the Shopping Goods trade area. 26 1 t 1 1 1 1 Table 13 CHAN-212 CONVENIENCE GOODS AND SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREAS AND MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAULMSA: AVERAGEAND MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME 2000 AND 2010 CENSUS; 2014 AND 2019 ESTIMATED Trade Area E: Estimated. Source: McComb Group, Ltd 27 Convenience Shopping Minneapolis - Goods Goods St. Paul M SA Average Household Income 2000 $ 92,335 $ 82,151 $ 67,906 2010 106,700 96,786 80,346 2014E 113,852 103,006 85,611 2019E 123,093 110,603 91,814 Median Household Income 2000 $ 74,242 $ 65,325 $ 54,202 2010 84,104 76,146 62,518 2014E 93,092 83,841 66,941 2019E 102,347 91,761 71,838 E: Estimated. Source: McComb Group, Ltd. The proportion of Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods trade areas households with incomes above $75,000, $100,000 and $150,000 are shown in Table 14. Table 14 CHAN-212 CONVENIENCE GOODS AND SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREAS AND MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAULMSA: HOUSEHOLD INCOME DISTRIBUTION 2000 AND 2010 CENSUS; 2014 AND 2019 ESTIMATED Trade Area Convenience Shopping Minneapolis - Goods Goods St. Paul M SA Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Households above $75,000 2000 18,534 47.6 % 48,497 38.7 % 357,430 31.4 % 2010 27,187 54.2 73,789 48.6 524,039 41.2 2014E 29,925 57.1 81,683 81.8 580,354 44.1 2019E 36,387 61.5 96,362 56.7 673,744 48.8 Households above $100,000 2000 11,614 29.8 % 28,848 23.0 % 191,856 16.9 % 2010 19,360 38.6 50,234 23.1 337,204 26.5 2014E 22,872 43.7 60,102 38.1 405,039 30.8 2019E 28,033 47.4 71,104 41.8 472,714 34.3 Households show $150,000 2000 4,766 12.2 % 12,257 9.8 % 66,951 5.9 % 2010 9,633 19.2 23,046 15.2 137,166 10.8 2014E 13,061 24.9 31,857 20.2 194,563 14.8 2019E 17,672 29.9 42,113 24.8 258,648 18.7 E: Estimated. Source: McComb Group, Ltd 27 id 1 In 2010, households with incomes above $75,000 represented 54.2 percent for the Convenience 1 Goods trade area and 48.6 percent for the Shopping Goods trade area. Households with incomes above $100,000 in 2010 were 38.6 percent for the Convenience Goods trade area and 23.1 percent for the Shopping Goods trade area. Estimates show these proportions increasing through 2019 1 when it is estimated that over 47 percent of the Convenience Goods trade area households will have incomes above $100,000 and 41.8 percent of Shopping Goods trade area households will have incomes over $100,000. 1 Distribution of households with incomes above $100,000, shown on Map 7, demonstrates that the more affluent households are distributed throughout the area, with the highest concentrations in 1 the northern and eastern portions of the trade areas. Map 7 1 CHAN-212 CONVENIENCE GOODS AND SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREAS 2019 ESTIMATED HOUSEHOLD INCOME: PERCENT ABOVE $100,000 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 Educational Attainment 1 Adult residents of the Chan -212 Convenience Goods trade area are highly educated with 52.7 percent holding either a college or graduate degree in 2014, as shown in Table 15. This group includes 31,280 college graduates (36.2 percent) and 14,233 graduate degrees (16.5 percent). This 1 educated pattern extends to the Shopping Goods trade area where 78,417 residents held college degrees and 33,832 have graduate degrees. i28 Employment by industry, as shown on Table 16, demonstrates that services, retail trade, and manufacturing are the leading employment industries for both trade areas, as well as the MSA. Chan -212 Convenience Goods trade area has an estimated 87,214 employees working at over 6,000 establishments. Services represent over 38 percent of the Convenience Goods trade area employment; retail trade represents over 20 percent; and manufacturing represents almost 17 percent. Employment by industry for the Shopping Goods trade area indicates that over 40 percent of the over 247,000 employees are employed in the service industry, 18.3 percent in retail trade, and 15.5 percent in manufacturing. Employment by industry for the MSA indicates that service employees represent over 42 percent of employees, retail trade employees represent 20 percent, and manufacturing represents over 11 percent of MSA employees. 911 Table 15 CHAN-212 COr- II CE GOODS AND SHOPPING GOODS TRADEARPAS AND MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL MSA ' MUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT: 2000 AND 2010 CENSUS; 2014 AND 2019 ESTIMATED 2000 2010 2014 E 2019 E ' Attainment Number Percent Number Percent CONVENIMCEGOODS TRADEARFA Number Percent Number Percent No College 12,236 19.2 % 14,538 17.5 % 15,046 17.4 % 16,898 17.4 % Some College/2 yr. Degree 20,308 31.9 24,734 29.7 25,840 29.9 28,904 29.8 College Graduate 22,875 35.9 30,371 36.5 31,280 36.2 35,278 36.4 ' Graduate School 8,237 12.9 13,620 16.4 14,233 16.5 13,924 16.4 SHOPPING GOODS TRADE ARFA No College 53,206 26.9 % 59,311 23.8 % 60,948 23.6 % 63,627 23.6 % Some College/2 yr. Degree 65,983 33.3 81,035 32.6 84,534 32.8 88,245 32.7 College Graduate 57,206 28.9 76,167 30.6 78,417 30.4 82,462 30.6 Graduate School 21,689 10.9 32,293 13.0 33,832 13.1 35,283 13.1 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL MSA ' No College 483,289 28.1 % 507,695 25.3 Some College/2 yr. Degree 606,358 35.2 679,794 33.9 % 518,016 25.3 % 546,728 25.2 % 694,199 33.9 733,140 33.8 College Graduate 440,341 25.6 550,877 27.5 563,878 27.5 596,216 27.5 Graduate School 192,249 11.2 268,265 13.4 274,608 13.4 290,351 13.4 N/A: Not Available or Not Applicable. E: Estimated Soorce: U.S Census, S./US and McComb ('aot4, Ltd. ' Employment Employment by industry and employment by occupation in 2014 for the Chan -212 trade areas and MSA are shown in Tables 16 and 17. This data is compiled by Scan/US, Inc. a provider of ' demographic data and is drawn from a comprehensive industry -standard business list of over 13 million establishments covering 148 million employees. Employment by industry, as shown on Table 16, demonstrates that services, retail trade, and manufacturing are the leading employment industries for both trade areas, as well as the MSA. Chan -212 Convenience Goods trade area has an estimated 87,214 employees working at over 6,000 establishments. Services represent over 38 percent of the Convenience Goods trade area employment; retail trade represents over 20 percent; and manufacturing represents almost 17 percent. Employment by industry for the Shopping Goods trade area indicates that over 40 percent of the over 247,000 employees are employed in the service industry, 18.3 percent in retail trade, and 15.5 percent in manufacturing. Employment by industry for the MSA indicates that service employees represent over 42 percent of employees, retail trade employees represent 20 percent, and manufacturing represents over 11 percent of MSA employees. 911 1 1 Establishments L 1 1 I I 1 Table 16 CHAN-212 CONVU41ENCEGOODS AND SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREAS AND MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL MSA: 2014 EMPLOYMENT BYE4DLNTRY Average employees per establishment Total Employees Agriculture/forestry/fishing Mining Constmction Manufacturing TranspoNconm/utilities Wholesale trade Retail trade Finance/insurance/real estate Services Government/other Source: Scm/US and McComb Group, Ltd Trade Areas Convenience Goods Shopping Goods Number Percent Number Percent 6,088 18,344 MSA Number Percent 154,292 14 13 14 87,214 247,470 Shopping 2,148,822 MSA 993 1.1 % 3,279 1.3 % 19,422 0.9 % 14 0.0 42 0.0 758 0.0 2,976 3.4 9,735 3.9 80,739 3.8 14,404 16.5 38,315 15.5 243,954 11.4 2,351 27 6,940 2.8 85,583 4.0 4,864 5.6 12,744 5.1 93,079 43 17,610 20.2 45,348 18.3 428,740 20.0 4,039 4.6 15,575 6.3 170,552 7.9 33,838 38.8 103,345 41.8 908,957 42.3 6,126 7.0 12,147 4.9 117,038 5.4 Employment by occupation for Chan -212 trade areas and the MSA are shown in Table 17. Management and professionals and sales and office occupations rank the highest for all three areas. Management and professionals occupations represent one third of all employment for both trade areas and MSA, while sales and office employment represents one quarter of all employment for all three areas. Table 17 CHAN-212 CONVENIENCEGOODS AND SHOPPING GOODS TRADEAREAS AND MINNEAPOLIS ST. PAUL MSA: 2014 EWLOYMENT BY OCCUPATION Source: ScimMS and McComb Group, Ltd Demographic Characteristics Demographic characteristics for Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods trade areas and the MSA are summarized in the demographic snapshots contained in Tables 18, 19, and 20 at the end of this chapter. These snapshots contain census data for 2000 and 2010, as well as estimates for 2014 and 2019. These estimates were provided by Scan/US, Inc., a source of Census 1 30 Trade Areas Convenience Goods Shopping Goods MSA Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Establishments 6,088 18,344 154,292 Average employees per establishment 14 13 14 Total Employees 87,214 247,470 2,148,822 Management and Professionals 29,401 33.7 % 83,940 33.9 % 751,180 35.0 % Service 13,775 15.8 38,490 15.6 351,213 16.3 Saks and Office 21,739 24.9 62,662 25.3 552,844 25.7 Natural Resources/Constmction/Maintenance 6,652 7.6 19,902 8.0 166,400 7.7 ProductiontTansportation 15,162 17.4 40,906 16.5 311,116 14.5 Unclassified 485 0.6 1,570 0.6 16,069 0.7 Source: ScimMS and McComb Group, Ltd Demographic Characteristics Demographic characteristics for Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods trade areas and the MSA are summarized in the demographic snapshots contained in Tables 18, 19, and 20 at the end of this chapter. These snapshots contain census data for 2000 and 2010, as well as estimates for 2014 and 2019. These estimates were provided by Scan/US, Inc., a source of Census 1 30 I comparable demographic information. Significant characteristics of Chan -212 trade areas include the following: ♦ Chan -212 Shopping Goods trade area population is older than the Convenience Trade area and MSA population with a median age of 41, compared to the Convenience Trade area ' median age of 39 and MSA median age of 37. ♦ Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods trade areas population is estimated to t increase at 2.39 percent and 1.49 percent, respectively, through 2019, which is above the MSA's annual population growth rate of 0.87 percent. ' ♦ In 2014, approximately 9.1 percent of the population in the Convenience Goods trade area was over the age of 65, which is expected to increase to about 12.0 percent by 2019. The Shopping Goods trade area and the MSA had about 12.0 percent of the population over the ' age of 65 in 2014, with expectations of an increase to over 15.0 percent by 2019. ' ♦ By 2019, almost 48 percent of the households within the Convenience Goods trade area and 42 percent in the Shopping Goods trade area will have incomes above $100,000, compared to only 34.3 percent in the MSA. ♦ Over 85 percent of the population within the Convenience Goods trade area is Caucasian, and about 90 percent in the Shopping Goods trade area are Caucasian. This is expected to 1 I remain constant through 2019. Additional demographic characteristics for Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods trade areas are contained in Appendix A at the end of this report. Purchasing Power Retail sales potential for the Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods trade areas is based on estimated purchasing power and market share that can be achieved from the trade areas. Retail sales from residents living outside the trade areas are inflow sales. Purchasing power estimates of trade area residents are derived from retail sales by store type as reported by the Census of Retail Trade in 2002 and 2007. Retail sales for 2007 through 2012 were estimated using information available from the U.S. Department of Commerce. Future purchasing power estimates are expressed in constant 2014 dollars and reflect projected household growth. Purchasing power is based on the number of trade area households adjusted to reflect income characteristics. Purchasing power, for the purpose of this analysis, includes retail categories that are characteristic of tenants that could be located at Chan -212. The estimated retail purchasing power summary table for the Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods trade areas for 2012, 2015, 2020 and 2025 is shown in Table 21. The purchasing power estimates used in this analysis are condensed from the full purchasing power tables, which are contained in a separate Appendix. These estimates represent the potential dollar sales for a broad range of retail stores generated by residents of each trade area. ' The Chan -212 Convenience Goods trade area purchasing power is estimated at $2.4 billion in 2012 and is expected to increase to about $2.7 billion by 2015, an annual growth rate of 3.7 percent in constant 2014 dollars. Purchasing power for shopping goods in this trade area is expected to 31 ' Source: McComb (roup, Ltd ' Total purchasing power for the Shopping Goods trade area is estimated at $6.7 billion in 2012 and is expected to increase to about $7.5 billion by 2015, an annual growth rate of 3.7 percent in constant 2014 dollars. Purchasing power for shopping goods in this trade area is expected to ' increase from $2.0 billion in 2012 to $2.2 billion in 2015. Convenience goods purchasing power for this trade area was estimated at $1.1 billion in 2012, estimated to increase to almost $1.3 billion by 2015. 1 1 1 32 increase from $715.9 million in 2012 to $807.6 million in 2015. Convenience goods purchasing power for this trade area was estimated at $407.6 million in 2012, and is estimated to increase to ' $459.8 million by 2015. Table 21 ' CHAN-212 CONVFNIINCEGOODS AND SHOPPING GOODS TRADEAREAS RETAIL PURCHASING POWER; 2012, 2015, 2020, AND 2025 (In Thousands of Constant 2014 Dollars) Merchandise Category 2012 2015 2070 2025 Convenience Goods Trade Area Shopping Goods $ 715,933 $ 807,573 $ 1,019,140 $ 1,217,730 ' Food Service & Drinking 269,449 303,942 383,567 458,309 Convenience Goods 407,591 459,763 580,209 693,267 Gasoline Service Stations & Convenience 296,279 334,203 421,756 503,940 ' Other Stores 710,456 801,398 1,011,344 1,208,415 Total $ 2,399,708 $ 2,706,879 $ 3,416,016 $ 4,081,661 Shopping Goods Trade Area ' Shopping Goods $ 2,009,920 $ 2,241,164 $ 2,726,633 $ 3,287,310 Food Service & Drinking 756,465 843,496 1,026,209 1,237,228 Convenience Goods 1,144,274 1,275,926 1,552,307 1,871,508 ' Gasoline Service Stations & Convenience 831,780 927,476 1,128,380 1,360,410 Other Stores 1,994,552 2,22,,028 2,705,782 3,262,174 Total $ 6,736,991 $ 7,512,090 $ 9,139,311 $ 11,018,630 ' Source: McComb (roup, Ltd ' Total purchasing power for the Shopping Goods trade area is estimated at $6.7 billion in 2012 and is expected to increase to about $7.5 billion by 2015, an annual growth rate of 3.7 percent in constant 2014 dollars. Purchasing power for shopping goods in this trade area is expected to ' increase from $2.0 billion in 2012 to $2.2 billion in 2015. Convenience goods purchasing power for this trade area was estimated at $1.1 billion in 2012, estimated to increase to almost $1.3 billion by 2015. 1 1 1 32 I 11 Table 18 n[cC om b DEMOGRAPHIC AND INCOME SNAPSHOT Group Ltd. Chao -212 Convenience Goods Trade Area 6/19/2014 ' ' ' SNAPSHOT Population Households Families Per Capita Income Median Household Income Average Household income Average Household Size Median Age 2000 Census 108,340 38,921 28,742 $ 33,228 $ 74,242 $ 92,335 2.77 33 2010 Census 134,614 50,156 35,828 $ 39,829 $ 84,104 $ 106,700 2.67 37 2014 Estimated 139,366 52,373 37,454 $ 42,874 $ 93,092 $ 113,852 2.64 39 2019 Projected 156,825 59,190 42,375 $ 46,546 $ 102,347 $ 123,093 2.63 40 Number Percent Number Percent <19 Annual Percent Change 33.3 % 41,291 ' TRENDS 30.0% 43,848 2000-2010 2010-201 20.24 2014-2019 4.6 Population 4.5 6,861 4.9 2.20% 7.1 0.87% 25-34 2.39% 15.6 Households 13.7 17,960 129 2.57 10.4 1.09 35-44 248 21.3 Families 15.4 20,107 14.4 2.23 13.1 1.12 45-54 2.50 ' Median Household Income 17.4 23,337 16.7 1.26 15.1 2.57 55-64 1.91 6.1 Average Household Income 10.6 16,732 12.0 1.46 14.3 1.64 65-74 1.57 3.1 5,941 2000 Census 2010 Census 2014 Estimated 2019 Projected ' HOUSEHOLDS BY INCOME Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 3.0 Less than $15,000 1,809 4.6% 2,402 4.8% 2,075 4.0% 2,097 3.5% ' $15,000-$24,999 $25,000 - $34,999 2,173 2,758 5.6 7.1 3,174 3,427 6.3 6.8 2,655 3,187 5.1 6.1 2,t77 3,084 3.7 5.2 Percent $35,000 - $49,999 4,789 12.3 4,877 9.7 5,706 10.9 6,995 11.8 85A % $50,000 - $74,999 8,857 22.8 91089 18.1 8,826 16.9 8,450 14.3 3.4 $75,000 - $99,999 6,920 17.8 7,827 15.6 7,053 13.5 8,354 14.1 ' $100,000-$149,999 6,847 17.6 9,728 19.4 9,811 18.7 10,360 17.5 6.2 $150,000+ 4,766 12.2 9,633 19.2 13,061 24.9 17,672 29.9 ' POPULATTON BY AGE Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent <19 36,122 33.3 % 41,291 30.7% 41,810 30.0% 43,848 28.0% 20.24 4,939 4.6 6,005 4.5 6,861 4.9 11,176 7.1 25-34 16,874 15.6 18,501 13.7 17,960 129 16,240 10.4 ' 35-44 23,040 21.3 20,724 15.4 20,107 14.4 20,597 13.1 45-54 15,172 14.0 23,481 17.4 23,337 16.7 23,752 15.1 55-64 6,642 6.1 14,277 10.6 16,732 12.0 22,390 14.3 65-74 3,350 3.1 5,941 4.4 7,626 5.5 11,792 7.5 ' 75-84 1,643 1.5 3,030 2.3 3,280 2.4 4,750 3.0 85+ 558 0.5 1,364 1.0 1,652 1.2 2,280 1.5 ' RACE ANDETHNICITY Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent White 100,228 92.5% 114,494 85.1 % 118,727 85.2% 133,898 85A % Black 1,580 1.5 4,778 3.5 4,888 3.5 5,398 3.4 Native American 338 0.3 519 0.4 531 0.4 613 0.4 ' Asian/Pacific Islander 3,600 3.3 8,682 6.4 8,852 6.4 9,777 6.2 Other Races 2,594 2.4 6,141 4.6 6,368 4.6 7,139 4.6 ' Hispanic (Any Race) 3,241 3.0 7,083 53 7,873 5.6 9,570 6.1 Source: U.S. Census, Scan/US, Inc. and McComb Group, Ltd 33 I ' Table 19 ' McComb Group, Ltd. DEMOGRAPHIC AND INCOMESNAPSHOT Chan -212 Shopping Goods Trade Area 6/19/2014 t SNAPSHOT 2000Census 2010Census 2014 Estimated 2019 Projected Population 333,532 394,528 407,361 438,533 Households 125,159 151,732 157,810 169,997 ' Families Per Capita Income $ 89,673 30,926 $ 106,108 37,307 S 110,591 40,007 $ 119,378 42,977 Median Household Income $ 65,325 $ 76,146 $ 83,841 $ 91,761 Average Household Income $ 82,151 $ 96,786 $ 103,006 $ 110,603 Average Household Sia 2.63 257 256 2.56 ' Median Age 36 39 41 42 Annual Percent Change ' TRENDS 2000-2010 2010-2014 2014-201 Population 1.69% 0.80% 1.49% Households 1.94 0.99 1.50 Families L70 1.04 1.54 Median Household Income 1.54 2.44 1.82 Average Household Income 1.65 1.57 1.43 2000 Census 2010 Census 2014 Estimated 2019 Projected ' HOUSEHOLDS BY INCOME Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Less than $15,000 8,705 7.0% 9,926 6.5% 8,667 5.5% 8,064 4.7% $15,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - S34,999 9,251 11,083 7.4 8.9 10,774 11,516 7.1 7.6 9,014 10,453 5.7 6.6 7,550 9,746 4.4 5.7 $35,000 - $49,999 18,092 14.5 16,996 11.2 20,097 12.7 22,775 13.4 $50,000 - $74,999 29,531 23.6 28,731 18.9 27,896 17.7 25,501 15.0 $75,000 - $99,999 19,649 15.7 23,556 15.5 21,582 13.7 25,257 14.9 ' $100,000-$149,999 16,591 13.3 27,187 17.9 28,245 17.9 28,992 17.1 $150,000+ 12,257 9.8 23,046 15.2 31,857 20.2 42,113 24.8 POPULATTONBYACE Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent <19 101,866 30.5% 113,893 28.9% 114,906 28.2% 117,819 26.9% 20-24 15,400 4.6 17,376 4.4 19,440 4.8 29,103 6.6 25-34 45,711 13.7 49,407 12.5 48,104 11.8 42,969 9.8 ' 35-44 62,970 18.9 57,511 14.6 55,737 13.7 54,456 12A 45-54 48,983 14.7 66,218 16.8 65,174 16.0 62,914 14.3 55-64 26,765 8.0 46,357 11.7 52,901 13.0 63,099 14.4 ' 65-74 16,557 5.0 23,530 6.0 28,898 7.1 39,878 9.1 75-84 11,021 3.3 13,492 3.4 14,190 3.5 18,546 4.2 85+ 4,259 1.3 6,745 1.7 8,012 2.0 9,748 2.2 ' RACE AND ETHNICITY Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent White 315,363 94.6 % 354,313 89.8 % 366,114 89.9 % 394,565 90.0% Black 3,092 0.9 9,014 2.3 9,229 2.3 9,778 22 Native American 1,047 0.3 1,568 0.4 1,617 0.4 1,764 0.4 ' Asian/Pacific Islander 6,849 2l 15,978 4.0 16,350 4.0 17,394 4.0 Other Races 7,181 2.2 13,655 3.5 14,051 3.4 15,032 3.4 ' Hispanic (Any Race) 8,380 2.5 15,824 4.0 17,424 4.3 20,291 4.6 Source: U.S. Census, Scan/US, Inc. and McComb Croup, Ltd 1 34 I ' Table 20 McComb DUMCRAPHIC AND INCOME SNAPSHOT ' iCGmup, Ltd. Minueapolis-SL Paul MSA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SNAPSHOT Population Households Fautilies Per Capita Income Median Household Income Average Household Income Average Household Sia Median Age TRENDS Population Households Famlics Median Household Income Average Household Income HOUSEHOLDSBYINCOME Less than $15,000 $15,000-524,999 525,000 - $34,999 535,000-$49,999 $50,000-$74,999 $75,000-$99,999 $100,000-$149,999 $150,000+ POPULATION BYACE <19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+ 2000 Census 2,968,808 1,136,615 744,303 $ 26,170 $ 54,202 $ 67,906 2.56 34 2010 Census 3,279,833 1,272,677 821,127 $ 31,330 $ 62,518 $ 80,346 2.53 36 2014 Estutated 3,361,394 1,316,673 851,800 $ 33,716 S 66,941 5 85,611 2.50 37 6/26/2014 2019 Projected Annual Percent Change 2014 Esturated 3,510,623 2010-2014120 1,380,185 1.00% 895,465 5 36,282 $ 71,838 $ 91,814 1.00 2.50 1.72 39 1.70 1.60 1.41 2000 Census Annual Percent Change 2014 Esturated 2000-2010 2010-2014120 4-2019 1.00% 0.62% 0.87 % 1.14 0.85 0.95 0.99 0.92 1.00 1.44 1.72 1.42 1.70 1.60 1.41 2000 Census 2010 Census 2014 Esturated 2019 Projected Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 104,773 9.2% 119,486 9.4% 106,379 8.1 % 98,748 7.2% 104,775 9.2 107,508 8.4 91,764 7.0 77,172 5.6 125,167 11.0 113,166 8.9 102,976 7.8 92,979 6.7 179,244 15.8 163,267 12.8 190,292 14.5 212,213 15.4 265,227 23.3 245,211 19.3 244,908 18.6 225,329 16.3 165,574 14.6 186,835 14.7 175,315 13.3 201,030 14.6 124,905 11.0 200,038 15.7 210,476 16.0 214,066 15.5 66,951 5.9 137,166 10.8 194,563 14.8 258,648 18.7 Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 873,681 29.4% 903,970 27.6% 903,080 26.9% 914,622 26.1 % 193,790 6.5 214,482 6.5 213,991 6.4 227,166 6.5 457,105 15.4 477,668 14.6 478,978 142 439,417 12.5 528,024 17.8 455,201 13.9 447,282 13.3 467,452 13.3 405,724 13.7 508,014 15.5 489,532 14.6 463,291 13.2 225,541 7.6 370,829 11.3 416,363 12.4 468,166 13.3 145,808 4.9 187,685 5.7 234,287 7.0 311,635 8.9 100,485 3.4 110,341 3.4 117,048 3.5 145,051 4.1 38,650 1.3 51,643 1.6 60,833 1.8 73,823 2.1 RACEANDE HNICH7 Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent White 2,556,853 86.1 % 2,656,553 81.0 % 2,727,284 81.1 % 2,857,513 81.4% Black 157,963 5.3 243,414 7.4 246,995 7.3 253,180 7.2 Native American 21,590 0.7 22,726 0.7 23,410 0.7 24,550 0.7 Asian/Pacific Islander 124,025 4.2 189,401 5.8 192,381 5.7 197,766 5.6 Other Races 108,377 3.7 167,739 5.1 171,324 5.1 177,614 5.1 Hispanic (Any Race) 99,121 3.3 176,283 5.4 190,243 5.7 212,333 6.0 Source: U.S. Census, Scan/US, Inc. and McComb Group, Ltd 35 Chapter V ' RETAIL SALES TRENDS ' Future sales potential at Chan -212 shopping center are based on market share that can be achieved taking into consideration trade area households, future growth, and potential competitive developments. Market share estimates for Chanhassen are based on estimated 2012 retail and ' service sales in Chanhassen. Retail sales estimates for 2012 were prepared for Chanhassen utilizing retail sales information ' from the Minnesota Department of Revenue and McComb Group's knowledge of the Twin Cities retail market. Retail sales for 2002, 2007, and 2012 are contained in Table 22. Retail sales in Chanhassen increased from $181.6 million in 2002 to $390.9 million in 2007, according to the ' U.S. Census of Retail Trade. This represents an average annual increase of 16.6 percent. Comparable sales for 2012 are not available. ' Table 22 CHANHASSEN RErAH.AND SERVICES SALES: 2002, 2007 AND 2012 ESTIMATED Mwsuaimd. or poaars) 2002 2007 2012 Estimated ' Store Type Number Dollars Number Dollars Number Dollars RETAILTRADE 78 S 181,607 76 $ 390,924 N/A N/A Convenience Retail ' Food Stores Liquor Stores 4 $ 48,861 6 7,725 4 5 S 53,650 8,475 4 7 S 67,650 11,250 Pharmacies and Drug Stores 6 11,978 6 13,141 3 16,938 Food Service Full -Service Food Service 11 S 11,802 12 S 19,364 12 S 18,795 Limited Service Food Service 22 14,797 21 21,956 30 21,347 ' Convenience/Gasoline 7 S 18,567 8 S 48,077 8 S 39,977 Shopping Goods Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores 1 2 3 S 1,154 Furniture and Home Furnishings 4 10 4 3,364 ' Electronics 1 2 3 2,976 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book and Music Stores 5 2,960 6 3,553 1,877 Home Improvement Building MateriaWarden Equipment/Supplies Dealers 12 S 29,215 13 S 42,455 12 S 84,807 Motor Vehicle & Parts Automotive Pans and Accessories 10 8,938 5 6,224 2 2,829 SERVICES Personal Services Personal and Laundry Services 15 35 36 $ 28,388 Hair, Nail, and Skin Care Services 6 24 7,049 16 23,586 Beauty Salons 6 20 12 6,710 Nail Salons 4 1,120 ' Repair Services Repair and Maintenance Automotive Repair and Maintenance 22 60,835 25 33,901 25 N/A HEALTH CARE ' Ambulatory Health Care Services 16 S 17,193 26 S 47,993 30 S 60,305 Offices of Dentists 5 3,622 10 7,524 9 9,589 p. Suppess si M U.S. Census Bureau. Soum U.S. Census Bureau and McComb Gmup. Ltd. Estimates indicate large increases in home improvement sales increased from $42.5 million to ' $84.8 million between 2007 and 2012. Sales estimates for personal services are $28.4 million for 2012 and health care is estimated at $60.3 million. 1 36 I ' Market Share Chanhassen's retail and service sales for 2012 are compared with purchasing power in Table 23to determine market share. Purchasing power for 2012 was calculated by McComb Group's sales ' potential model for both the Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods trade areas. Market share estimates are based on convenience goods purchasing power for categories where customers typically shop close to home. Shopping goods purchasing power is used for comparison shopping ' and destination categories. Retail sales derived from Chan -212 trade areas were estimated for each retail category to determine trade area sales and market share as a percent of purchasing power. ' Table 23 CHANHASSEN MARKET SHARES 2012 On Thousands of Dollars) ' Trade Trade Purchasing Retail Area Area Market Store Type Power Sales Percent Sales Share ' RErAILTRADE Convenience Retail Grocery Stores $ 232,976 $ 67,650 85% $ 57,503 24.68 ' Liquor Stores 40,006 11,250 85% 9,563 23.90 Drug Stores 101,427 16,938 85% 14,397 14.19 Food Service Full Service Food Service $ 111,310 • $ 18,795 800/6 $ 15,036 13.51 % ' Limited Service Food Service 84,718 • 17,078 80% 13,662 16.13 Convenience/Gasoline $ 266,392 $ 39,977 70% $ 27,984 10.50 % Shopping Goods ' Clothing& Accessories Stores $ 281,464 ' $ 1,154 70% $ 808 0.29 % Furniture & Home Furnishing; 194,236 • 3,364 700% 2,355 1.21 Electronics and Appliances Stores 205,468 ' 2,976 700% 2,083 1.01 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book & Music Stores 135,436 • 1,877 70% 1,314 0.97 ' Home Improvement Building MateriaVGarden Equip./Supplies Dealers $ 617,063 • $ 84,807 90% $ 76,326 12.37 % Lawn and Garden Equpiment and Supplies Stores 76,638 • 4,366 900% 3,929 5.13 ' Motor Vehicles & Parts Automotive Parts Dealers $ 20,238 $ 2,829 906% $ 2,546 12.58 % Tire Dealers 15,296 2,366 900% 2,129 13.92 ' SERVICES Personal Services Drycleaning and Laundry Services $ 14,391 $ 3,682 90% $ 3,314 23.03 % Beauty Salons 21,852 6,710 85% 5,704 26.10 ' HEALTH CARE Ambulatory Health Care Servcies $ 376,045 $ 60,305 800/ $ 48,244 12.83 % Offices of Dentists 84,404 9,589 800/b 7,671 9.09 ' -Shopping goods purchasing power. Source; U.S. Census Bureau and McComb Group, Ltd. ' Using grocery stores as an example, purchasing power in 2012 was estimated at $233.0 million. Retail sales were estimated at $67.6 million with 85 percent of those sales assumed to be derived from the trade area. This results in trade area sales of $57.5 million, which is 24.68 percent of ' estimated trade area purchasing power or market share. Liquor store sales of $11.2 million results 1 37 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 in market share of 23.90 percent, similar to grocery stores. Drug store market share was estimated at 14.19 percent. The food service category is divided into two segments: full service and limited service. Full service restaurants retail sales of $18.8 million results in a market share of 13.51 percent of convenience goods purchasing power with 80 percent of sales derived from the trade area. Limited service establishments had a 16.13 percent market share. Market share in convenience retail categories ranges from 14.19 percent to 24.68 percent. Market share for shopping goods categories ranges from a low of 0.29 percent for clothing and accessories to 1.21 percent for furniture based on Shopping Goods trade area purchasing power. This low market share reflects sales of the limited number of shopping goods stores and their limited drawing power. Market share for individual service categories ranges from 23.03 percent for dry cleaning and laundry services to 26.10 percent for beauty salons. These market share calculations were used to estimate future market share for Chan -212 and determine the amount of retail space that can be supported at Chan -212. Retail and service sales potential for Chan -212 is based on market share that can be achieved taking into consideration past market share trends, trade area households, future growth, and potential competitive developments. Market share estimates are based on analysis conducted as part of this engagement and McComb Group's knowledge of the Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA retail market. Sales potential was estimated for target years 2015, 2020, and 2025 to identify growth in retail and service sales as trade area households and purchasing power increase. Purchasing power is derived from Chapter IV. Market share was estimated for each retail and service category taking into consideration past market share performance, trade area size, competitive store locations, and industry experience. Trade area market share for Chan -212 by store type is shown in Table 24. Using apparel and accessories stores in the shopping goods category as an example, market share is 12.5 percent with an estimated 75 percent of the sales being derived from the Shopping Goods trade area. Full service restaurant market share is estimated at 6.0 percent with 80 percent of the sales being derived from the Shopping Goods trade area. Grocery store market share is 15.0 percent with 90 percent of the sales being derived from the Shopping Goods trade area. Convenience/gasoline is a possibility for the proposed location, either freestanding or as a component of a grocery store site. Market share is 1.0 percent with 90 percent of sales from the trade area. Services market share ranges from 10.0 to 20.0 percent with 80 percent of the sales being derived from the Convenience Goods trade area. The above market share estimates reflect the fact that the proposed Chan -212 shopping center will draw customers from a large area, and will capture, in general, 5.0 to 20.0 percent of trade area spending potential. 1 38 I 1 Table 24 CHAN-212 TRADE AREAS MARKET SHAREAND TRADEAREA SALES ' Store Type 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 J Convenience Goods Grocery Stores Drug & Proprietary Stores Liquor Stores Hardware Stores Convenience/Gasoline Stores Other Retail Stores Building Materials Auto Parts & Accessories Services* Health Care* Market Shopping Goods Share General Merchandise ' Apparel & Accessories 12.5 Furniture & Home Furnishings ' Electronics & Appliances Stores Other Shopping Goods* 15.0 Food Service ' Full Service Restaurants Limited Service Restaurants 6.0 % Snack & Beverage Places 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 J Convenience Goods Grocery Stores Drug & Proprietary Stores Liquor Stores Hardware Stores Convenience/Gasoline Stores Other Retail Stores Building Materials Auto Parts & Accessories Services* Health Care* Market Percent Share Saks 10.0-20.0 % 75 % 12.5 75 12.5 75 15.0 75 12.5 75 6.0 % 80 % 5.0 80 5.0 80 15.0 % 7.5 15.0 7.5 1.0 % 15.0 % 7.5 10.0-20.0 % * Convenience Goods trade area purchasing power. Source: McComb Group, Ltd. Sales Potential 10.0 % 95 % 95 80 % 85 % Estimating retail and service space demand is a two-step process. Sales potential for each retail or service category is estimated first to determine if retail sales are sufficient to support a store. Next, store size is determined based on store productivity and typical store size for each category. This methodology is illustrated for 2015 in Tables 25 and 26. These tables use selected convenience goods and shopping goods stores as an example to illustrate how sales potential and supportable square footage of retail stores and services is determined. Grocery store resident purchasing power in 2015 is estimated at $254.4 million in constant 2014 dollars, as shown in Table 25. Market share of 15.0 percent results in $38.2 million of trade area sales. Due to the large trade area, 90 percent of sales are estimated to be derived from the trade area. Inflow sales are estimated at $4.3 million or 5.0 percent of sales resulting in total sales of $42.5 million. Department store sales potential is estimated at $35.4 million assuming a 20.0 percent market share with 75 percent of sales derived from the trade area. Apparel and accessories market share is estimated at 12.5 percent with 75 percent of sales derived from the trade area. Sales potential for women's clothing and family clothing is $9.8 million and $22.8 million, respectively. 1 39 ' Table 25 t RErAR.PURCHASING CHAN-212 SHOPPING CENTER POWER, MARKET SHARE, AND SAIES POTENTIAL; 2015 BY MERCHANDISE CATEGORY (in Thousands of 2014 Constant Dollars) ' Resident Estimated Trade Trade Estimated Purchasing Market Area Area Other Total Merchandise Category Power Share Sales Percent Shoppers Sales ' CONVENIENCE GOODS Grocery Stores $ 254,437 15.0 % $ 38,166 90 % $ 4,328 $ 42,494 Drug & Proprietary Stores 113,054 7.5 8,479 90 942 9,421 ' Liquor 44,592 15.0 6,689 90 743 7,432 SHOPPING GOODS Department Stores $ 132,602 20.0 % $ 26,520 75 % S 8,840 S35,360 Apparel & Accessories Stores ' Men's and Boy's S 13,260 12.5 % $ 1,658 75 % S 553 S 2,211 Women's Clothing 58,934 12.5 7,367 75 2,456 9,823 Children's & Infants 27,257 12.5 3,407 75 1,136 4,543 ' Family Clothing 137,022 12.5 17,128 75 5,709 22,837 Clothing Accessories Stores 8,103 12.5 1,013 75 338 1,351 Other Clothing Stores 22,100 12.5 2,763 75 921 3,684 ' Sotuce: McComb Group, Ltd. Supportable Space ' Retail gross leasable area (GLA) supported by estimated sales potential for each retail store category is based on estimated sales per square foot (in 2014 dollars) by store type. Sales per square foot estimates are derived from median store sales per square foot for each tenant type ' contained in Dollars & Cents of Shopping Centers, published by the Urban Land Institute, and have been increased to reflect sales per square foot in 2014. Supportable GLA is calculated by ' dividing sales potential by sales per square foot. This analysis was used to provide an estimate of the supportable square footage in each retail store category. t Supportable square feet of GLA is based on estimated sales divided by typical sales per square foot for each retail store type, as shown in Table 26. Using grocery stores as an example, supportable GLA is based on sales potential of $43.3 million divided by $460 per square foot ' resulting in supportable GLA of about 94,087 square feet. Drug store supportable square footage is about 20,480 square feet. Supportable square footage of liquor stores is about 19,800 square feet. Supportable GLA is determined for other stores in the manner described above. ' The last three columns in this table contain the low, median, and high store size for each store type from Dollars & Cents of Shopping Centers. Median store size indicates a typical size for a store ' in each retail category. To the extent that supportable square footage is about the same as the median store size or larger, sales potential exists to support that store type. Supportable square footage by retail and service category for each target year are contained in Table 27 in Chapter VI. 1 40 I I 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 Table 26 CHAN-212 SHOPPING CENTER REfAILSALES POTENITALAND SUPPORTABLE SPACE, 2015 BY MERCHANDLSECATEGORY Store types and median store sizes used in this analysis are based on current retail formats and store size. Since this study extends over a 10 -year period, store types and concepts may change during this period. Recent trends have been for many store types to increase in size to accommodate a larger selection of merchandise and increase customer attraction. 41 Estimated Sales Sales Supportable Store Size Cateppry Potential Sq. FL Sq. Ft. LOW Median High CONVENIENCE GOODS Grocery Stores $43,280,000 $460 94,087 31,676 52,500 65,888 Drug&Proprietary Stores 9,421,000 460 20,480 8,280 11,700 23,714 Liquor 7,432,000 375 19,819 1,305 2,856 7,210 S HOPPING GOODS Department Stores $35,360,000 $225 157,156 89,641 148,796 243,167 Apparel &Accessories Stores M en's and Boy's 5 2,211,000 $220 10,050 2,002 4,000 5,635 Women's Clothing 9,823,000 200 49,115 2,074 4,200 8,740 Children's & Infants 4,543,000 240 18,929 1,490 3,912 6,000 Family Clothing 22,837,000 260 87,835 2,374 8,000 28,228 Clothing Accessories Stores 1,351,000 290 4,659 918 1,400 2,001 Other Clothing Stores 3,684,000 265 13,902 1,060 2,300 8,234 Source: McComb Group, Ltd - Store types and median store sizes used in this analysis are based on current retail formats and store size. Since this study extends over a 10 -year period, store types and concepts may change during this period. Recent trends have been for many store types to increase in size to accommodate a larger selection of merchandise and increase customer attraction. 41 I Chapter VI ' SALES POTENTIAL AND SUPPORTABLE GLA ' The Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods trade areas have the potential to support more GLA than can be accommodated at the proposed development. This creates the enviable ' situation where the developer can choose from a wide variety of retail stores to establish its market position. 1 42 Supportable GLA ' Estimated Chan -212 supportable GLA by retail store type is contained in Table 27. In almost every category, supportable space exceeds the median store size. These estimates of supportable ' square feet are likely to be understated due to the high trade area household income. Also, there are likely to be a large proportion of high income and high asset households where there are few constraints on discretionary spending. ' Table 27 CHAN-212 SHOPPING GOODS SUPPORTABLEGLA BY MERCHANDISE CATEGORY ' (Gross t<asable Area) Store Sim ' Merchandise Category CONVENNNCEGOODS 2015 2020 2025 Low Median High Food Stores Grocery Stores 94,087 113,202 135,261 31,676 52,500 65,888 Supermarkets 92,189 110,915 132,528 31,245 52,419 69,462 ' Convenience Food 2,913 3,507 4,190 1,349 2,085 5,323 Specialty Food Stores 7,650 9,205 11,000 1,188 2,400 6,000 Meat Markets 2,529 3,036 3,631 1,130 2,215 18,080 Baked Goods 524 632 756 1,191 1,834 3,285 ' Confectionery and Nut Stores 409 494 591 702 1,240 2,047 All Other Specialty Food Stores 1,095 1,315 1,570 1,069 2,200 8,007 Other Convenience Goods ' Drug & Proprietary Stores 20,480 24,643 29,443 8,280 11,700 23,714 Hardware 7,795 9,384 11,211 5,638 13,831 27,743 Liquor 19,819 23,845 28,491 1,305 2,856 7,210 Florist 2,879 3,463 4,137 766 1,600 5,396 ' Food/Health Supplement Stores 1,400 1,684 2,012 1,200 1,234 1,968 Food Service Full -Service Restaurants 72,594 88,319 106,481 2,000 4,500 9,775 ' Limited Service Restaurants 41,438 50,415 60,783 1,335 3,000 3,400 Cafeterias 3,528 4294 5,170 517 1,073 10,049 Snack & Beverage Places 14,733 17,927 21,613 850 1500 2,495 Ice Cream & Soft Serve 1,702 2,071 2,492 902 1,148 1,570 ' Finan Yogurt 275 340 405 1,031 1,282 1,700 Doughnut Shops 3,518 4,zn 5,159 744 1,N10 2,153 Bagel Shops 804 978 1,178 2,000 2,388 3,400 Coffee Shops 4,698 5,713 6,888 881 1,500 2,000 ' Cookie Shops 138 170 203 220 602 797 Other Snack Shops 2,456 2,986 3,600 850 1,578 2,495 Gasoline S" Stations/Con¢ tCas/Convenience Food Stores 6,619 8,052 9,708 1500 2,933 6,121 1 42 I 1 43 Table 27 (continued) ' CHAN-212 SHOPPING GOODS SUPPORTABLE GLA BY MERCHANDISE CATEGORY (Gross leasable Area) ' Store Sine Merchandise Category 2015 2020 2025 Low Median High SHOPPING GOODS ' General Merchandise Department Stores (Incl. leased depts.) Discount Stores 216,484 263,376 317536 57,720 94,788 141,986 Department Stores 157,156 191,2(10 230,520 89,641 148,796 243,167 Other General Merchandise Stores t Warehouse Clubs and Supercenters 270,224 328,758 396,362 90,134 151,980 217,447 Dollar Stores 23,218 28,25(1 34,055 2,726 8,000 13,788 Miscellaneous General Merchandise 47,148 57,360 69,156 3,2W 8,400 11,212 ' Apparel & Accessories Clothing Stores Mens and Boys 10,050 12,223 14,732 2,002 4,000 5,635 Womens Clothing 49,115 59,755 72,040 2,074 4200 8,740 ' Children's & Infant 18,929 23,029 27,767 1,490 3,912 6,000 Family Clothing 87,835 106,862 128,835 2,374 8,000 28,228 Clothing Accessories Stores 4,659 5,666 6,831 918 1,400 2,001 Other Clothing Stores 13,902 16,909 20,389 1,060 2,300 82M ' Shoe Stores Men's 921 1,117 1,348 903 1,640 2,186 Women's 1,759 2,137 2,574 1,309 2,384 3,158 Children's & Infant 424 514 621 1,490 3,912 6,000 ' Family Shoe Stores 28,063 34,143 41,166 2,021 3,388 10,234 Athletic Footwear 11,931 14,514 17,491 1,535 3,284 11,314 Furniture & home Furnishings Furniture 74,612 90,773 109,442 3,108 7,927 36,712 ' Floor Covenngs 32,742 39,836 48,022 1,229 3,593 7,819 Window Treatment Stores 3,510 4,267 5,143 1,489 4,905 9,934 Ali Other Home Furnishings Stores 49,114 59,749 72,040 2,868 3,570 6,500 ' Electronics & Appliances Stores Household Appliance Stores 26255 31,938 38,505 2,349 4,000 7,563 Radio, TV& Electronics Stores 99,203 120,693 145517 1,208 3,406 10,451 ' Computers, Software, Music, & Other Electronics Other Shopping Goods 15,241 18,543 22,357 997 3,388 25,600 Sporting Goods 81,035 98,585 118,860 2,238 7,500 44,116 General Line Sporting Goods 33,155 40,335 48,625 3,765 5,850 28,128 Specialty lane Sporting Goods 42,564 51,787 62,431 1,097 2,449 4,356 ' Book Stores & News dealers 28,394 34,544 41,650 2,428 4,542 29,974 Stationery Stores and Office Supply 16,043 19,520 23,531 585 1,033 2,247 Musical Instrument & Supplies 11254 13,696 16,513 2,432 7,324 26,094 Jewelry Stores 28,332 34,471 41,560 790 1,450 3,410 ' Hobby, Toy & Game 25,257 30,726 37,051 1,604 4,050 25,861 Camera & Photographic Supply 6,695 8,149 9,822 816 2,200 5,%5 Gift, Novelty & Souvenirs 33,567 40,827 49,227 2,369 4,422 7,015 Luggage &Leather Goods 3,065 3,735 4,5W 1,193 2,300 3,102 ' Sewing, Needlework & Piece Goods 23,330 28,390 34,210 2,678 12,202 19,299 Pet Stores 22,100 26,885 32,420 1,847 3,200 12,398 Art Dealers 3,276 3,982 4,800 675 1,434 2,401 Optical Goods Stores 12,703 15,452 18,631 885 1,561 4,068 ' Pre -Recorded Tapes, Compact Discs 3,048 3,709 4,470 1,308 3,426 12,753 Cosmetics, Beauty Supplies & Perfume 9,409 11,447 13,800 1,102 1,953 6.235 All Other Health & Personal Care 18,753 22,8I1 27,505 697 1,786 3,084 1 43 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 [l 1 Table 27 (continued) CHAN-212 SHOPPING GOODS SUPPORTABI.EGL1 BY MERCHANDISE CATEGORY (Gross Leasable Area) Shopping Center Size Sales potential and supportable square feet provide an indication of shopping center potential. Shopping center size will depend on tenant interest and the number of anchor stores. The potential GLA by store category ranges from 825,000 square feet to 1,120,000 square feet, as shown in Table 28. Convenience goods ranges from 105,000 square feet to 135,000 square feet depending on supermarket size and number of other retailers. Convenience goods includes stores where 44 Store Sia Merchandise Category 2015 2020 2025 Low Median High OTHER RETAIL STORES Building Materials & Garden Supplies Budding Materials & Supplies Stores Home Centers 91,060 110,786 133,566 8,981 95,173 135,833 Paint, Glass &Wallpaper 9,564 11,636 14,031 2,348 3,533 5,028 Lawn & Carden Equipment Outdoor Power Equipment 25,590 31,140 37,540 N/A N/A N/A Retail Nurseries, lawn & Carden 72,890 88,680 106,920 N/A 15,000 N/A Motor Vehicles & Parts Dealers Auto Pans & Accessories Stores 25,010 30,425 36,685 2,232 6,500 13,000 The Dealers 18,900 22,995 27,725 3,514 6,944 12,014 SERVICES Personal Care Services Beauty Shops 16,084 9,111 10,879 900 1,400 3,480 Nail Salons 2,027 1,145 1,373 773 1,200 1,807 Diet & Weight Reducing Services 1,320 747 893 1,223 1,856 3,130 Other Personal Care Services 2,509 1,417 1,691 703 1,488 4,128 Dryeleaning & Laundry Services Drycleanmg & laundry Services (except coin -op.) 4,367 9,880 11,807 1,038 1,608 2,731 Other Personal Services Child Day Care Services 14,750 16,710 19,960 3,059 5,050 7,495 Photographic Studios 2,156 2,440 2,916 990 1,866 2,550 Veterinarian Services 9,849 11,151 13,329 1,346 2,122 2,701 Pet Care 3,387 3,827 4,560 900 12M 1,500 Rental and Leasing Fomialwear and Costume Rental 482 729 871 763 1,046 1,773 Home Health Equipment Rental 1,664 2,516 3,008 1,200 1,600 3,480 Recreation Physical Fitness Facilites 67,750 76,725 91,663 1,433 6,448 32,170 Health Care Offices of Physicians Offices of Physicians 69,703 83,863 100,202 969 1,652 4,008 Offices of Dentists 32,197 19,368 23,145 1,090 1,700 3,970 Offices of Chiropractors 4,649 2,797 3,42 1,090 1,600 3,970 Offices of Optometrists 1,764 3,183 3,805 1,074 1,620 4,347 Offices of Mental Health Practitioners 2,391 4,16 5,157 1,090 1,800 3,970 Physical & Occupational Therapists 4,006 7,232 8,641 1,090 1,600 3,970 Source: McComb (roup, Ltd Shopping Center Size Sales potential and supportable square feet provide an indication of shopping center potential. Shopping center size will depend on tenant interest and the number of anchor stores. The potential GLA by store category ranges from 825,000 square feet to 1,120,000 square feet, as shown in Table 28. Convenience goods ranges from 105,000 square feet to 135,000 square feet depending on supermarket size and number of other retailers. Convenience goods includes stores where 44 I 1 convenience is a primary consideration as they are visited on a regular basis. Examples include ' supermarkets, drug, liquor, hardware, and other stores and services. Source: McComb Group, Ltd Shopping goods retailers are stores where comparison shopping is a common part of the shopping trip. Department stores typically anchor these shopping centers. Potential anchor store GLA ' ranges from 120,000 square feet to 220,000 square feet. Junior anchor retailers are various size stores, ranging in size from 10,000 square feet to 50,000 square feet, also adding the center's drawing power. Junior anchor GLA could range from 220,000 square feet to 315,000 square feet. ' Inline, small store tenants could range from 110,000 square feet to 180,000 square feet. Total shopping goods stores could range from 450,000 square feet to 715,000 square feet. ' Food service establishments are expected to range from 35,000 square feet to 50,000 square feet. Services of various types could range from 20,000 square feet to 30,000 square feet. ' Destination retailers like health clubs, home centers, and cinemas, could total 215,000 square feet to 235,000 square feet if all three located at Chan -212. It is possible that not all the anticipated potential tenants will located at Chan -212 indicating that ' the shopping center is likely to be between 800,000 square feet and 1,000,000 square feet. 1 45 Table 28 ' CHAN-212 POTENTIAL GROSS LEASABLE AREA Cross Leasable Area ' Store Category Low High Convenience Gook 105,000 135,000 Shopping Gook ' Anchor Stores 120,000 220,000 Junior Anchors 220,000 315,000 Inline Stores 110,000 180,000 ' Subtotal 450,000 715,000 Food Service ' Restaurants Fast Food 20,000 15,000 30,000 20,000 Subtotal 35,000 50,000 Services 20,000 30,000 ' Destination Stores Health Club 50,000 60,000 Home Center 115,000 115,000 Cinema 50,000 60,000 Subtotal 215,000 235,000 ' Total 825,000 1,165,000 Source: McComb Group, Ltd Shopping goods retailers are stores where comparison shopping is a common part of the shopping trip. Department stores typically anchor these shopping centers. Potential anchor store GLA ' ranges from 120,000 square feet to 220,000 square feet. Junior anchor retailers are various size stores, ranging in size from 10,000 square feet to 50,000 square feet, also adding the center's drawing power. Junior anchor GLA could range from 220,000 square feet to 315,000 square feet. ' Inline, small store tenants could range from 110,000 square feet to 180,000 square feet. Total shopping goods stores could range from 450,000 square feet to 715,000 square feet. ' Food service establishments are expected to range from 35,000 square feet to 50,000 square feet. Services of various types could range from 20,000 square feet to 30,000 square feet. ' Destination retailers like health clubs, home centers, and cinemas, could total 215,000 square feet to 235,000 square feet if all three located at Chan -212. It is possible that not all the anticipated potential tenants will located at Chan -212 indicating that ' the shopping center is likely to be between 800,000 square feet and 1,000,000 square feet. 1 45 Sales Potential Estimated sales potential by retail store type is contained in Table 29. These estimates of sales potential are likely to be understated due to the high trade area household income. Tade29 CHAN-212 SALES POTENTIAL BY MERCHANDISE CATEGORY (ln 7Lousands of Dollars) Merchandise Category 2015 2020 2025 CONVINIlNVCEGOODS Food Stores Grocery Stores $ 43,280 $ 52,073 $ 62,220 Supermarkets 42,407 51,021 60,963 Convenience Food 874 1,052 1,257 Specialty Food Stores 1,530 1,841 2,200 Meat Markets 569 683 817 Baked Goods 131 158 189 Confectionery and Nut Stores 131 158 189 A8 Other Specialty Food Stores 219 263 314 Other Convenience Goods Doig & Proprietary Stores $ 9,421 $ 11,336 S 13,544 Hardware 1,442 1,736 2,074 Liquor 7,432 8,942 10,684 Florist 547 658 786 Food/Health Supplement Stores 350 421 503 Food Service Full-Seryice Restaurants $ 26,134 $ 31,795 $ 38,333 Limited Service Restaurants 16,575 20,166 24,313 Cafeterias 829 1,009 1,215 Snack& Beverage Places 4,420 5,378 6,484 Ice Cream & Soft Serve 553 673 810 Frozen Yogurt 55 68 81 Doughnut Shops 774 941 1,135 Bagel Shops 221 269 324 Coffee Shops 1,879 2,285 2,755 Cookie Shops 55 68 81 Other Snack Shops 884 1,075 1,296 Gasoline Svs Stations/Coax Cas/Convenience Food Stores $ 9,266 S 11,273 S 13,591 46 I 1 1 11 1 1 1 Table 29 (continued) CHAN-212 SALES POTENTIAL BY MERCHANDISECAT EGORY (In Thousands of Dollars) Merchandise Category 2015 2020 2025 SHOPPING GOODS General Merchandise Department Stores (Incl. leased depts.) Discount Stores S 54,121 S 65,844 $ 79,384 Department Stores 35,360 43,020 51,867 Other General Merchandise Stores Warehouse Clubs and Supercenters S 121,601 S 147,941 $ 178,363 Dollar Stores 5,108 6,215 7,492 Miscellaneous General Merchandise 11,787 14,340 17,289 Apparel & Accessories Clothing Stores Mens and Boys S 2,211 $ 2,689 S 3,241 Womens Clothing 9,823 11,951 14,408 Children's & Infant 4,543 5,527 6,664 Family Clothing 22,837 27,784 33,497 Clothing Accessories Stores 1,351 1,643 1,981 Other Clothing Stores 3,684 4,481 5,403 Shoe Stores Men's S 267 $ 324 S 391 Women's 475 577 695 Children's & Infant 123 149 180 Family Shoe Stores 4,911 5,975 7,204 Athletic Footwear 2,088 2,540 3,061 Furniture & Home Furnishings Furniture S 19,399 S 23,601 S 28,455 Floor Coverings 7,367 8,963 10,805 Window Treatment Stores 737 896 1,080 All Other Home Furnishings Stores 8,595 10,456 12,607 Electronics & Appliances Stores Household Appliance Stores $ 7,220 $ 8,783 $ 10,589 Radio, TV & Electronics Stores 29,761 36,208 43,655 Computers, Software, Music, & Other Electronics 8,840 10,755 12,967 Other Shopping Goods Sporting Goods S 16,207 S 19,717 $ 23,772 General Line Sporting Goods 6,631 8,067 9,725 Specialty Line Sporting Goods 9,577 11,652 14,047 Book Stores & Newsdealers 4,543 5,527 6,664 Stationery Stores and Office Supply 6,016 7,320 8,824 Musical Instrument & Supplies 2,701 3,287 3,963 Jewelry Stores 9,208 11,203 13,507 Hobby, Toy & Game 4,420 5,377 6,484 Camem & Photographic Supply 1,841 2,241 2,701 Gift, Novelty & Souvenirs 5,035 6,124 7,384 Luggage & Leather Goods 613 747 900 Sewing, Needlework & Piece Cods 2,333 2,839 3,421 Pet Stores 4,420 5,377 6,484 Art Dealers 737 8% 1,080 Optical Goods Stores 3,684 4,481 5,403 Pre -Recorded Tapes, Compact Discs 701 853 1,028 Cosmetics, Beauty Supplies & Perfume 3,011 3,663 4,416 All Other Health & Personal Care 5,157 6,273 7,564 47 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Table 29 (continued) CHAN-212 SALES POTENTIAL. BY MERCHANDISE CATEGORY (In Thousands of Dollars) Merchandise Category OTHER RETAIL STORES Building Materials & Garden Supplies Building Materials & Supplies Stores Home Centers Paint, Glass & Wallpaper Lawn & Garden Equipment Outdoor Power Equipment Retail Nurseries, Lawn & Garden Motor Vehicles & Parts Dealers Auto Parts & Accessories Stores Tire Dealers SERVICES Personal Care Services Beauty Shops Nail Salons Diet & Weight Reducing Services Other Personal Care Services Drycleaning & Laundry Services Drycleaning & Laundry Services (except coin -op.) Other Personal Services Child Day Cam Services Photographic Studios Veteranarian Services Pet Care Rental and leasing Formahvear and Costume Rental Home Health Equipment Rental Recreation Physical Fitness Facilites Health Care Offices of Physicians Offices of Physicians Offices of Dentists Offices of Chiropractors Offices of Optometrists Offices of Mental Health Practitioners Physical & Occupational Therapists Source: McComb Group, Ltd 48 $ 31,871 2,152 2,559 7,289 $ 5,002 3,780 $ 3,056 223 198 439 $ 655 $ 1,475 593 2,216 254 $ 176 416 $ 5,420 $ 24,884 11,108 1,604 732 825 1,382 2020 $ 38,775 2,618 3,114 8,868 $ 6,085 4,599 $ 46,748 3,157 3,754 10,692 $ 7,337 5,545 $ 1,731 $ 2,067 126 151 112 134 248 296 $ 1,482 $ 1,771 $ 1,671 $ 1,996 671 802 2,509 2,999 287 342 $ 266 $ 318 629 752 $ 6,138 $ 29,939 6,682 %5 1,321 1,489 2,495 $ 7,333 $ 35,772 7,985 1,153 1,579 1,779 2,981 1 Appendix A ' DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS 1 Table A-1 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Population and Households; 2000 and 2010 Census; ' 2014 and 2019 Estimated Table A-2 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and t Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Average and Median Household Incomes; 2000 and 2010 Census; 2014 and 2019 Estimated ' Table A-3 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Household Income; 2000 and 2010 Census; 2014 and 2019 Estimated ' Table A4 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and ' Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Households, Families and Household Size; 2000 and 2010 Census; 2014 and 2019 Estimated ' Table A-5 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Educational Attainment; 2000 and 2010 Census; 2014 and 2019 Estimated ' Table A-6 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Age Distribution; 2000 and 2010 Census; 2014 and ' 2019 Estimated Table A-7 Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods Trade Areas and ' Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA: Ethnicity; 2000 and 2010 Census; 2014 and 2019 Estimated 1 1 1 1 49 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Table A -I CHAN-212 CONVENIENCE GOODS AND SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREAS, AND MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL MSA POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLDS: 2000 AND 2010 CENSUS; 2014 AND 2019 ESTIMATED N/A: Not Available. E: Estimated. Source: U.S. Census, Scan/US and McComb Group, Ltd 50 Population Households Rate of Rate of Trade Area / Year Number Change Number Change CONVENIENCE GOODS TRADE AREA 2000 108,340 N/A 38,921 N/A 2010 134,614 2.20 % 50,156 2.57 % 2014 E 139,366 0.32 52,373 0.39 2019 E 156,825 2.39 59,190 2.48 SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREA 2000 333,532 N/A 125,159 N/A 2010 394,528 1.69 % 151,732 1.94 % 2014 E 407,361 0.29 157,810 0.36 2019 E 438,533 1.49 169,997 1.50 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL MSA 2000 2,968,808 N/A 1,136,615 N/A 2010 3,279,833 1.00 % 1,272,677 1.14 % 2014 E 3,361,394 0.22 1,316,673 0.31 2019 E 3,510,623 0.87 1,380,185 0.95 N/A: Not Available. E: Estimated. Source: U.S. Census, Scan/US and McComb Group, Ltd 50 1 1 t 1 1 Table A-2 CHAN-212 CONVENIENCE GOODS AND SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREAS, AND MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL MSA AVERAGE AND MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOMES 2000 AND 2010 CENSUS; 2014 AND 2019 ESTIMATED E: Estimated. Source: U.S. Census, Scan(US and McComb Group, Ltd. 51 Convenience Shopping Minneapolis - Goods Goods St. Paul Income Type/ Year Trade Area Trade Area MSA Average Household Income 2000 $ 92,335 $ 82,151 $ 67,906 2010 106,700 96,786 80,346 2014 E 113,852 103,006 85,611 2019 E 123,093 110,603 91,814 Median Household Income 2000 $ 74,242 $ 65,325 $ 54,202 2010 84,104 76,146 62,518 2014 E 93,092 83,841 66,941 2019 E 102,347 91,761 71,838 E: Estimated. Source: U.S. Census, Scan(US and McComb Group, Ltd. 51 I C 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 Table A-3 CHAN-212 CONVENIENCE GOODS AND SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREAS, AND MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL MSA HOUSEHOLD INCOME: 2000 AND 2010 CENSUS; 2014 AND 2019 ESTIMATED Income Distribution 2000 2010 2014 E 2019 E Less than SI5,000 Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent CONVENIENCE GOODS TRADE AREA 2,173 5.6 3,174 Households 38,921 50,156 52,373 59,190 Avenge Size 2.77 2.67 2.64 2.63 Household Income $50,000-$74,999 8,857 22.8 9,089 Median $ 74,242 $ 84,104 $ 93,092 S 102,347 Avenge $ 92,335 $ 106,700 $ 113,852 S 123,093 Households Above $50,000 27,391 70.4 % 36,276 72.3 % 38,751 74.0 % 44,837 75.8 % Households Above $75,000 18,534 47.6 27,187 54.2 29,925 57.1 36,387 61.5 Income Distribution 4.0 % 2,097 3.5 % 2,655 Less than SI5,000 1,809 4.6 % 2,402 4.8 % $15,000-$24,999 2,173 5.6 3,174 6.3 $25,000 - $34,999 2,758 7.1 3,427 6.8 $35,000 - $49,999 4,789 12.3 4,877 9.7 $50,000-$74,999 8,857 22.8 9,089 18.1 $75,000 - $99,999 6,920 17.8 7,827 15.6 $100,000-$149,999 6,847 17.6 9,728 19.4 $150,000+ 4,766 12.2 9,633 19.2 SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREA 29,531 23.6 28,731 18.9 Households 125,159 25,501 151,732 $75,000-$99,999 Avenge Sin 2.63 23,556 2.57 21,582 Household Income 25,257 14.9 $100,000-$149,999 16,591 2,075 4.0 % 2,097 3.5 % 2,655 5.1 2,177 3.7 3,187 6.1 3,084 5.2 5,706 10.9 6,995 11.8 8,826 16.9 8,450 14.3 7,053 13.5 8,354 14.1 9,811 18.7 10,361 17.5 13,061 24.9 17,672 29.9 157,810 169,997 2.56 2.56 Median $ 65,325 $ 76,146 S 83,841 Avenge $ 82,151 $ 96,786 S 103,006 Households Above $50,000 78,028 62.3 % 102,521 67.6 % 109,580 Households Above $75,000 48,497 38.7 73,789 48.6 81,683 $ 91,761 $ 110,603 69.4 % 121,863 71.7 % 51.8 96,362 56.7 Income Distribution Less than $15,000 8,705 7.0 % 9,926 6.5 % 8,667 5.5 % 8,064 4.7 % $15,000 - $24,999 9,251 7.4 10,774 7.1 9,014 5.7 7,550 4.4 $25,000 - $34,999 11,083 8.9 11,516 7.6 10,453 6.6 9,746 5.7 $35,000 - $49,999 18,092 14.5 16,996 11.2 20,097 12.7 22,775 13.4 $50,000-$74,999 29,531 23.6 28,731 18.9 27,896 17.7 25,501 15.0 $75,000-$99,999 19,649 15.7 23,556 15.5 21,582 13.7 25,257 14.9 $100,000-$149,999 16,591 13.3 27,187 17.9 28,245 17.9 28,992 17.1 $150,000+ 12,257 9.8 23,046 15.2 31,857 20.2 42,113 24.8 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL MSA Households 1,136,615 1,272,677 1,316,673 1,380,185 Average Sin 2.56 2.53 2.50 2.50 Household Income Median $ 54,202 S 62,518 $ 66,941 S 71,838 Avenge 5 67,906 S 80,346 $ 85,611 $ 91,814 Households Above $50,000 622,657 54.8 % 769,250 60.4 % 825,262 62.7 % 899,073 65.1 % Households Above $75,000 357,430 31.4 524,039 41.2 580,354 44.1 673,744 48.8 Income Distribution Less than $15,000 104,773 9.2 % 119,486 9.4 % 106,379 8.1 % 98,748 7.2 % $15,000-$24,999 104,775 9.2 107,508 8.4 91,764 7.0 77,172 5.6 $25,000-$34,999 125,167 11.0 113,166 8.9 102,976 7.8 92,979 6.7 $35,000-549,999 179,244 15.8 163,267 12.8 190,292 14.5 212,213 15.4 $50,000 - $74,999 265,227 23.3 245,211 19.3 244,908 18.6 225,329 16.3 $75,000 - $99,999 165,574 14.6 186,835 14.7 175,315 13.3 201,030 14.6 $100,000-$149,999 124,905 11.0 200,038 15.7 210,476 16.0 214,066 15.5 $150,000+ 66,951 5.9 137,166 10.8 194,563 14.8 258,648 18.7 N/A: Not Aw lable or Not Applimble. E: r wastes. Soma: U.S. Census, S S and McComb Goup, Ltd. 52 Table A-4 CHAN-212 CONVENIENCE GOODS AND SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREAS, AND MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL MSA HOUSEHOLDS, FAMILIES AND HOUSEHOLD SIZE; 2000 AND 2010 CENSUS; 2014 AND 2019 ESTIMATED 53 2000 2010 2014 E 2019 E Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent CONVENIENCE GOODS TRADE AREA Households 38,921 50,156 52,373 59,190 Families 28,742 35,828 37,454 42,375 As Percent of Households 73.8 % 71.4 % 71.5 % 71.6 % Household Size 1 Person 7,762 19.9 % 11,450 22.8 % 11,962 22.8 % 13,506 22.8 % 2 Persons 11,996 30.8 15,905 31.7 16,619 31.7 18,755 31.7 3A Persons 14,735 37.9 17,515 34.9 18,317 35.0 20,717 35.0 5+ Persons 4,428 11.4 5,286 10.5 5,475 10.5 6,212 10.5 Average Household Sin 2.77 2.67 2.64 2.63 SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREA . Households 125,159 151,732 157,810 169,997 Families 89,673 106,108 110,591 119,378 As Percent of Households 71.6 % 69.9 % 70.1 % 70.2 % Household Size 1 Person 28,252 22.6 % 37,146 24.5 % 38,682 24.5 % 41,562 24.4 % 2 Persons 42,228 33.7 51,556 34.0 53,694 34.0 57,759 34.0 34Persons 41,747 33.4 48,152 31.7 50,170 31.8 54,146 31.9 S+Persons 12,932 10.3 14,879 9.8 15,263 9.7 16,530 9.7 Average Household Size 2.63 2.57 2.56 2.56 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL MSA Households 1,136,615 1,272,677 1,316,673 1,380,185 Families 744,303 821,127 851,800 895,465 As Percent of Households 65.5 % 64.5 % 64.7 % 64.9 % Household Size 1 Person 303,050 26.7 % 350,440 27.5 % 362,455 27.5 % 379,457 27.5 % 2 Persons 370,926 32.6 420,693 33.1 435,230 33.1 456,238 33.1 34 Persons 348,717 30.7 376,082 29.6 389,184 29.6 408,342 29.6 S+Persons 113,922 10.0 125,462 9.9 129,804 9.9 136,148 9.9 Average Household Sin N/A: Not Available or Not Applicable. E: Estimated. Source: U.S. Census, S../US and McComb Group, Ltd. 53 Table A-5 CHAN-212 CONVENIENCE GOODS AND SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREAS, AND MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL MSA EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT: 2000 AND 2010 CENSUS; 2014 AND 2019 ESTIMATED 2000 2010 2014 E 2019 E Attainment Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent CONVENIENCE GOODS TRADE AREA No College 12,236 Some College/2 yr. Degree 20,308 College Graduate 22,875 Graduate School 8,237 SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREA 25,840 No College 53,206 Some College2 yr. Degree 65,983 College Graduate 57,206 Graduate School 21,689 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL MSA 36.4 No College 483,289 Some College/2 yr. Degree 606,358 College Graduate 440,341 Graduate School 192,249 N/A: Not Avalable or Not Appbcable. 23.8 % E: EAunwed. 23.6 % Source: U S. Census, Scan/US and McComb Group, Lid 19.2 % 14,538 17.5 % 15,046 17.4 % 16,898 17.4 % 31.9 24,734 29.7 25,840 29.9 28,904 29.8 35.9 30,371 36.5 31,280 36.2 35,278 36.4 12.9 13,620 16.4 14,233 16.5 15,924 16.4 26.9 % 59,311 23.8 % 60,948 23.6 % 63,627 23.6 % 33.3 81,035 32.6 84,534 32.8 88,245 32.7 28.9 76,167 30.6 78,417 30.4 82,462 30.6 10.9 32,293 13.0 33,832 13.1 35,283 13.1 28.1 % 507,695 25.3 % 518,016 25.3 % 546,728 25.2 % 35.2 679,794 33.9 694,199 33.9 733,140 33.8 25.6 550,877 27.5 563,878 27.5 596,216 27.5 112 268,265 13.4 274,608 13.4 290,351 13.4 54 ' E: Estimated. Somce: U.S. Cmus, Scan(US avd McComb Group, Ltd. 1 1 55 Table A-6 CHAN-212 CONVENIENCE GOODS AND SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREAS, ' AND MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL MSA AGE DISTRHIUTION: 2000 AND 2010 CENSUS; 2014 AND 2019 ESTIMATED ' 2000 2010 2011 E 2016 E Age Distribution Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent CONVENIENCE GOODS TRADE AREA ' Under 5 9,682 8.9 % 9,901 7.4 % 9,490 6.8 % 9,918 6.3 % 5-9 10,131 9.4 10,821 8.0 10,627 7.6 10,093 6.4 10-14 9,403 8.7 11,134 8.3 11,418 8.2 11,515 7.3 ' 1S - l9 20-24 6,905 4,939 6.4 4.6 9,435 6,005 7.0 4.5 10,275 6,861 7.4 4.9 12,322 11,176 7.9 7.1 25 - 34 16,874 15.6 18,501 13.7 17,960 12.9 16,240 10.4 35-44 23,040 21.3 20,724 15.4 20,107 14.4 20,597 13.1 45-54 15,172 14.0 23,481 17.4 23,337 16.7 23,752 15.1 ' 55-64 6,642 6.1 14,277 10.6 16,732 12.0 22,390 14.3 65-74 3,350 3.1 5,941 4.4 7,626 5.5 11,792 7.5 75+ 2,200 2.0 4,394 3.3 4,933 3.5 7,030 4.5 ' 25-64 61,729 57.0 % 76,983 57.2 % 78,136 56.1 % 82,979 52.9 % 65 and Over 5,551 5.1 10,335 7.7 12,559 9.0 18,822 12.0 SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREA ' Under 5 24,710 7.4 % 27,356 6.9 % 26,255 6.4 % 26,304 6.1 % 5-9 26,992 8.1 30,299 7.7 29,708 7.3 26,635 6.2 10-14 27,460 8.2 30,351 7.7 31,075 7.6 30,404 7.1 ' 15-19 20-24 22,704 15,400 6.8 4.6 25,887 17,376 6.6 4.4 27,868 19,440 6.8 4.8 32,093 28,515 7.5 6.6 25-34 45,711 13.7 49,407 12.5 48,104 11.8 42,101 9.8 35-44 62,970 18.9 57,511 14.6 55,737 13.7 53,355 12.4 45-54 48,983 14.7 66,218 16.8 65,174 16.0 61,642 14.3 ' 55-64 26,765 8.0 46,357 11.7 52,901 13.0 61,824 14.4 65-74 16,557 5.0 23,530 6.0 28,898 7.1 39,072 9.1 75 + 15,281 4.6 20,237 5.1 22,201 5.4 27,722 6.5 ' 25-64 184,429 55.3 % 219,493 55.6 % 221,916 54.5 % 218,922 51.0 % 65 and Over 31,837 9.5 43,767 11.1 51,099 12.5 66,794 15.5 MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL MSA ' Under 212,810 7.2 % 226,483 6.9 % 222,212 6.6 % 221,399 6.3 % 5 - 9 225,355 7.6 228,363 7.0 227,598 6.8 222,130 6.3 10-14 225,652 7.6 225,476 6.9 226,605 6.7 229,336 6.5 ' IS - 19 20-24 209,864 193,790 7.1 6.5 223,648 214,482 6.8 6.5 226,665 213,991 6.7 6.4 241,757 227,166 6.9 6.5 25-34 457,105 15A 477,668 14.6 478,978 14.2 439,417 12.5 35-44 528,024 17.8 455,201 13.9 447,282 13.3 467,452 13.3 45-54 405,724 13.7 508,014 15.5 489,532 14.6 463,291 13.2 ' 55-64 225,541 7.6 370,829 11.3 416,363 12A 468,166 13.3 65-74 145,808 4.9 187,685 5.7 234,287 7.0 311,635 8.9 75+ 139,135 4.7 161,984 4.9 177,881 5.3 218,874 6.2 ' 25-64 1,616,394 54.4 % 1,811,712 55.2 % 1,832,155 54.5 % 1,838,326 52.4 % 65 and Over 284,943 9.6 349,669 10.7 412,168 12.3 530,509 15.1 ' E: Estimated. Somce: U.S. Cmus, Scan(US avd McComb Group, Ltd. 1 1 55 Table A-7 CHAN-212 CONVENIENCE GOODS AND SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREAS, AND MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL MSA ETHNICITY: 2000 AND 2010 CENSUS, 2014 AND 2019 ESTIMATED 56 2000 2010 2014 E 2019 E Ethnicity Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent CONVENIENCE GOODS TRADE AREA Caucasian 100,228 92.5% 114,494 85.1 % 118,727 85.2 % 133,898 85.4% African-American 1,580 1.5 4,778 3.5 4,888 3.5 5,398 3.4 Native American 338 0.3 519 0.4 531 0.4 613 0.4 Asian/Pacific Islander 3,600 3.3 8,682 6.4 8,852 6.4 9,777 6.2 Other 2,594 2.4 6,141 4.6 6,368 4.6 7,139 4.6 Hispanic(myrace) 3,241 3.0% 7,083 5.3% 7,873 5.6% 9,570 6.1 % SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREA Caucasian 315,363 94.6% 354,313 89.8% 366,114 89.9% 386,588 90.0% African-American 3,092 0.9 9,014 2.3 9,229 2.3 9,581 2.2 Native American 1,047 0.3 1,568 0.4 1,617 0.4 1,728 0.4 Asian/Pacific Islander 6,849 2.1 15,978 4.0 16,350 4.0 17,042 4.0 Other 7,181 2.2 13,655 3.5 14,051 3.4 14,728 3.4 Hispanic(anyrace) 8,373 2.5 % 15,817 4.0% 17,416 4.3 % 19,871 4.6% MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL MSA Caucasian 2,556,853 86.1 % 2,656,553 81.0% 2,727,284 81.1 % 2,857,513 81.4% African-American 157,963 5.3 243,414 7.4 246,995 7.3 253,180 7.2 Native American 21,590 0.7 22,726 0.7 23,410 0.7 24,550 0.7 Asian/Pacific Islander 124,025 4.2 189,401 5.8 192,381 5.7 197,766 5.6 Other 108,377 3.7 167,739 5.1 171,324 5.1 177,614 5.1 Hispanic (my race) 99,121 3.3% 176,283 5.4% 190,243 5.7 % 212,333 6.0% E: Estimated. Source: U.S. Census, ScaM1S and McComb Croup, Ltd. 56 I I 1 k 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ON THE BEAT `Upscale' plans draw council's interest CARVER COUNTY ERIN ADLER The Chanhassen City Council got an early look at possible plans for a 120 -acre mixed-use devel- opment on Oct. 24 when Level 7 Development introduced the proj- ect at a work session. The development, called Avi- ends, would be at the corner of Powers and Lyman boulevards on a parcel of farmland, a half -mile southeast of Chanhassen High School. It would likely include entertainment, major retailers or department stores, boutiques, restaurants, hotels and housing, such as row houses, townhouses or senior housing. "What we're hoping to see out of this is your clothing store, your shoe store, your specialty bou- tiques," said City Manager Todd Gerhardt. "Where downtown Chanhassen is more service-ori- ented;' he said, "this would be more upscale:' The center would ideally draw custometsnot just from Chanhas- sen, but also from the western sub- urbs as a whole, Gerhardt said. This is the second attempt at building retail space, offices and housing on the site. In early 2015, developer Scott Carlston brought plans for a similar project called the Quadrant to the City Council The city was worried then because the land was owned by two differ- ent entities and there was no over- all plan. The project soon fizzled out Gerhardt said. This time, two landowners are banding together to create one uni- form development Gerhardt said. Based on reactions to the previ- ous development, there's demand for amenities like a hotel, high- density housing for families and medical offices, said Mayor Denny Laufenburger- "I would say mere are many ;idents in support of it," the Tor 894. "I wouldn't say all of On the upside Laufenburger said, "There's going to be a lot of jobs there. And Chanhassen resi- dents want jobs." Developers said the project will have its challenges, includ- mg f -^-g stormwater and the many wetlands that could require alteration. There are four or five wetlands on the property, Gerhardt said, including two significant ones. He noted that wetlands can be addressed in a number of ways, adding that it's best to try to avoid them altogether. The developer would like to keep some wetlands and relocate others. Council Member Elise Ryan cautioned that some Chanhas- sen residents care about environ- mental issues and protection of the nearby wetlands could be a concern. The previous developer com- missioned a 2014 market retail study that was also used to guide this project, city documents said. That study showed that the area could support between 825,000 and 1,120,000 square feet of new retail and commercial space and noted that the area is growing. Local households had an average income of $103,006 in 2014, about 20 percentabove the'I win Cities aver- age, demonstrating an unmet need in the community, the study said. The city's planning commission reviewed the project Tuesday. At that meeting, residents brought up concerns about traffic and the wetlands' fate, as wellas their hope that the buildings would have a "high quality"look, Gerhardt said. On Nov 28, the City Council will examine the proposal, ave feedback and decide whether to direct city staff to prepare what's known as an Alternative Urban Areawide Review, a planning tool local governments can use to understand how different devel- opment scenarios will affect the environment of their community before the development occurs, according to the Minnesota Envi- ronmental Quality Board. isErin Adler • 612-6771791 CITY OF C HANHASSE N Chanhassen is a Community for Life- Providing forToday and Planning forTomorrow MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhart FROM: Kate Aanenson AICP, Community Development Director SUBJ: Avienda CASE # 2016-25 D DATE: November 28, 2016 BACKGROUND PROPOSSED ACTION: The City Council provide observations and feedback to the developer on the Concept Planned Unit Development including the observations in the attached November 1' Staff Report. The PUD ordinance states, "in order to receive guidance in the design of a PUD prior to submission of a formal application, an applicant may submit a concept plan for review and comment by the Planning Commission and City Council. Following the receipt of the report and recommendations from the Planning Commission, the City Council shall consider and comment on the concept plan". ANALYSIS On November I st a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission (verbatim minutes are included in the November 28' packet). Following is a generalized list of issues and concerns raised: • Density on two of the residential parcels are 26-34 units an acre exceeding city density limits • Loss of wetlands — would like to see a plan that saves the wetlands and the overall impact to the wetlands after the development is completed • Tree loss • Over grading of the site — ignoring the terrain • Can they meet the storm water requirements? • Walkability of the proposal PH 952.227.1100 • www.d.Chanhassen.rlln.us • FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 • Traffic on Bluff Creek Boulevard • Amount of commercial development — with the expectation the uses would be different/complementary to what exists in the current down -town area with emphasis on specialty/bigh-end retail • Screening or loading on the back of buildings/access management • Light and noise pollution • Sustainability of big boxes • Lack of charm / should be quaint / what makes it unique • Too much asphalt • Lack of parks and open space — gathering places Acting Chair Steven Weick summarized the comments at the November I' meeting as he felt fell into 4 buckets: 1. "There's aesthetics that I think people are very concerned about moving forward. Whether it be site grading which then probably leads to the charm of what you actually create there as far as the buildings. There's noise and light pollution that I would consider aesthetics. Park space and open space. 2. There's a traffic bucket that you know we'll look at but obviously that was a primary concern that came out of the meeting this evening. Specifically the access points for Bluff Creek on both sides. Not just going into the neighborhood but entering the site from 212 as well as the proposed entrance, I think it's at Mill is the name of the, so I think those 3 points are specific traffic concerns. 3. 1 think there was some good density questions that came up just regarding, and obviously this is preliminary but we need to keep that into consideration and we will as these things move forward but that is a very valid concern that was raised, and finally I think 4. The wetland preservation and how we do that moving forward so I think those, a lot of the comments fell into those 4 buckets so if we can certainly be sure in addition to everything that's noted by staff in the packet, if we can specifically make note of those items that came out this evening I think we'll be moving in a good direction." RECOMMENDATION The City Council provide observations and feedback to the developer on the Concept Planned Unit Development including the observations in the attached November 1' Staff Report. Attachments 1. Email from Jennifer Swanson 2. Email from Geetha Bhatraj 3. Email Bhanu Thota 4. Email from Pramod Putta 5. Email from Lori and Corey Hothan 6. Planning Commission Staff Report dated November 1, 2016 g:\plan\2016 planning cases\2016-25 avienda - chan retail sitek:c c memo I 1-28-16.docx Aanenson, Kate From: Jennifer Swanson <swanjls@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 5:21 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Proposed Developmetn Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Completed Kate, I had the opportunity to view the planning meeting earlier this week regarding the proposed development at Lyman and Powers Blvd. You had indicated that one of the goals of the project was to have a housing component as part of the project. When the previous study was conducted there was not to my knowledge a housing component identified for the site. I am curious when that change took place. You had also indicated that the southwest building was to be designated as senior housing. In the McComb study there was a conclusion that the site could support 825k - 1M+ of retail and would be a regional draw. The concern that I have is that because a significant portion of the project is being developed as housing there will not be the appropriate square footage available for retail to make this a regional draw. If the PUD approves the proposed layout toward the acreage designated for High Density housing what guarantee will there be that it is senior housing vs Market Rate apartments. I feel that the location of this project gives significant retail advantages over other locations in Chanhassen. The close proximity to Highway 212 gives the potential for retail development and will utilize existing infrastructure. Eric Swanson 1440 Bethesda Cir Chanhassen, MN Aanenson, Kate From: geetha bhatraj <gbhatraj22@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 10:18 AM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Avienda Development Hi Kate, This is Geetha. I live in the neighborhood on the preserve. I attended the discussion the last week or before in regards to the Avienda development. Looks to be a great development initiative. It was brought to our notice that there could be a possible road connection from the Mills drive into the new development for School bus and public Safety. Ours is a young neighborhood with lot of infants and toddlers. So having that road extension is not a great value addition for the community as it might increase thru traffic and increase safety concerns. This is due to the fact that once we have a road we really cannot restrict the traffic. By having dead end will restrict the traffic. During the meeting same concerns were raised by other members in the neighborhood. Please consider this as a sincere request from our neighborhood not to have a road extension on Mills drive. Hope council takes decision considering preserve residents opinion. Thanks Geetha Aanenson, Kate From: Bhanu Thota <bhanuprashant.t@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2016 3:58 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Avienda Development - Mills Drive resident - Concerns Hi, I am Bhanu Thota, resident of 1495 Mills Dr of Preserve. I would like to raise my concern regarding the proposed Avienda Development in our area. Myspecific concern is regarding the road connection from Mills Drive to the new development. Our community has a lot of infants and toddlers and connecting the Mills Drive to the new development will increase the traffic. This is a serious issue for the young kids. Please consider this as a sincere request from our neighborhood not to have a road extension on Mills drive. Hope council considers our concerns in making the decision. Sincerely, Bhanu Thota 1495 Mills Dr Aanenson, Kate From: Pramod Putta <pramod.putta@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2016 3:39 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Avienda Development - Mills Drive Concerns Hi, Good afternoon, this is Pramod and Kavitha living at 1502 Mills Dr of Preserve. We are writing to voice our concern about possible proposed road connection from Mills drive into the new development for School bus and public Safety. We are very concerned about safety of little kids with possible increased traffic that new connection may bring into the neighborhood. Please consider this as a sincere request from our neighborhood not to have a road extension on Mills drive. Hope council considers our concerns in making the decision. Sincerely, Pramod Putta and Kavitha Vimmigari 1502 Mills Dr November 3, 2016 Dear City Council, We are Lori and Corey Hothan; we live at 1941 Commonwealth Blvd., #5, Chanhassen, MN 55317. Our e-mail address is LHothan0l@hotmail.com. The purpose of our letter/e-mail is in regards to the New Development "of Avienda." We do have some key concerns we would like to share with you as our City Council, pertaining to this new development. Please see our key concerns listed below: Traffic Over -Flow: We have a huge concern with where the connection of our existing development, which is off of Bluff Creek Blvd., where this would be connected to the New Development for Avienda. If this connection was actually to take place, this would bring way too much over -flow of traffic into our existing development. This is totally unnecessary to connect this street (Bluff Creek Blvd.) into the New Development of Avienda. If there is a law that this actually and physically has to take place, then we as homeowner's have the right to see actual documentation supporting this connection. However, if there technically is not a law or something backing this connection, then this truly should not take place for the reasons listed above. The City Council and the Builder need to take this into serious consideration as to what this would actually do to the existing developments and/or homeowner's. The other concern pertaining to the Traffic Over -Flow, would be for the homeowner's who live right off of Hwy 212, Pioneer Trail and Lyman Blvd. where you are building this New Proposed Development for Avienda, that when the current homeowner's come home from work the traffic from the new development is going to create a huge traffic mess. How can this really be addressed if this New Development takes place right off of the on and off ramp of Hwy 212? That is one of the key questions of the day. Noise Buffers and Pollution: I know the builder from what we understand from our neighbor, had briefly mentioned or touched on two of the things that are highly important to those homeowner's, such as our selves who currently live in the existing developments which are right off of Bluff Creek Blvd.. I know for both of us that when you are putting in this type of new development (Avienda), right off of Powers Blvd. that as homeowner's we want to know that we can still enjoy living in our existing development and not have the noise and pollution become an enormous factor. Current homeowner's who have lived here now for about 8 to 10 years, do not want to have to stress about possibly having to deal with Noise and Pollution issues. Aesthetics' For the New Development of Avienda: - In regards to aesthetically what is currently being proposed for how the new Avienda development looks, we feel that it would be better if they could make it look a little more eye catching or appealing so it doesn't look like every other new development that has already been built within the twin cities. - We think maybe some stone or metal is ok for this new development, but try and find a balance. We would suggest that maybe have the developer come back and have a couple of ideas from an aesthetic outside perspective on how this New Development for Avienda could look. Please don't make this like every other development that has already been done to death. Page 2 Lori and Corey Hothan Concerns for the New Development of Avienda Aesthetics' For the New Development of Avienda (continued) - In regards to the some of the trees within this new development for Avienda, as a couple we know that some of these trees would need to be taken down. Now with that being said, it would really be nice if the developer could preserve some of the existing trees, because we really do have some gorgeous beautiful maples, etc... currently existing within this new development that is looking to be built. In any area there needs to be a balance between trees, mother nature and buildings so -to -speak. Retail, Restaurants. Commercial and Offices: - We also have a definite concern in regards to what is going to truly support all of the retail businesses that you are looking at putting in for this New Development for Avienda. - If you look around the city of Chanhassen, you certainly can see and tell that there have been businesses that have come and gone over the years that they have been here. When deciding on how many businesses, restaurants, etc... it might be wise for you as a City Council to take a step back and seriously think about what is realistic in regards to how many retailers, restaurants, etc... that really should be built and put in this new development. In this day and age, our economy truly just does not support new retailers and businesses. The proof is truly in the pudding, if you truly just look around and see how many businesses in our community just are not making it that should tell you something. As a City Council you have got to be honest with yourself and suggest what is realistic and what is not. - In regards to the Restaurants that the City Council and the Builder are looking at putting in at this new development for Avienda, we would strongly suggest that you look at actual restaurants, and not fast food chains. We have more than enough fast food chains within our Chanhassen community. Please look at some of the key, top restaurants that would make our new development of Avienda a little different and even more so updated. As I mentioned we have enough McDonalds' and fast food places within our Chanhassen community, so please do not add those to the new development of Avienda. The other thing pertaining to Apartments/Condo's or Business Buildings, is that we somewhat have a concern in regards to how high these buildings might end up being. We would definitely prefer these buildings to stay on the definite lower side of things, and not where we have buildings which might be say 6 to 20 stories high. Again, when putting the specs in for this new development of Avienda, you need to always keep the current homeowners or developments in mind. We don't need sky scrapper buildings put within this new development, keep in mind in the end, how is it going to affect the existing developments and/or homeowner's. Kate, we would greatly appreciate it if you would please pass on our current thoughts and concerns to the rest of the City Council members for this new proposed development for Avienda. We hope that the City Council takes our thoughts and concerns into serious consideration, especially since we live right by this new proposed development for Avienda. We would love to attend any of the upcoming meetings for this new proposed development. I have provided our names and phone number listed below. Thank you — Best regards, Lori and Corey Hothan 952.368.0559 PROPOSED ACTION: The Planning Commission provide observations and feedback to the City Council on the Concept Planned Unit Development. PROPOSAL: Conceptual Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (PUD) of 6 parcels on approximately 118 acres of land. C!*_� LOCATION: Southwest comer of Powers Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard APPLICANT: Landform Professional Services LLC 105 South Fifth Ave Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55330 PRESENT ZONING: A-2 Agricultural Estate 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Office, Regional Commercial, and Medium Density Residential ACREAGE: Approximately 118 acres DENSITY: N/A SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The developer is requesting conceptual review to consider rezoning from Agricultural Estate to Planned Unit Development Regional Commercial. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION MAHING: The Planning Commission is providing the City Council with comments and direction on the Concept Planned Unit Development. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is requesting a general concept plan review for a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The site is currently zoned Agricultural Estate (A-2). With the adoption of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan in 2008, the City Council guided the property west of Powers Boulevard for either Office or Commercial. With the update of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the city considered two land use options for the subject properties: Office or Regional Commercial. The dual guiding allows the City Council to review the application for Regional Commercial to ensure it furthers the city's vision as stated in the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The 1.66 -acre parcel located east of Powers Boulevard is zoned Agricultural Estate and is guided Medium Density Residential. The applicant has not proposed development plans for this parcel at this time. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment is necessary for any action to change the land use. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 2 of 37 The use of the PUD zoning also allows for greater specificity in the types, location and sizes of uses. The city has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would be the case with the other, more standard zoning districts. It is the applicant's responsibility to demonstrate that the city's expectations are to be realized as evaluated by the city's goals and policies (see Attachment #11— 2007 Community Survey questions asked regarding a regional mall). HISTORY OF THE SITE A Concept PUD for a Regional Commercial zoning was approved by Planning Commission and the City Council in 2015. That application included 70 acres, this application is for 118 acres. The City Council did authorize the update of the AUAR (Alternative urban Areawide Review). The update was never executed. The development of the 118 acres in now under a new LLC and will be included in the AUAR. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 3 of 37 Parcel and Site Information Parcel ID Taxpayer Acreage Land Use Current Zoning 250230500 Level 7 Development Inc. 22.89 Office or Commercial A-2 Agricultural Estate 1.66 Medium Density A-2 Agricultural Estate 250230300 Level 7 Development Inc. 54.07 Office or Commercial A-2 Agricultural Estate 250230410 Level 7 Development Inc. 20 Office or Commercial A-2 Agricultural Estate 250230430 Level 7 Development Inc. 16 Office or Commercial A-2 Agricultural Estate 250230420 Level 7 Development Inc. 4 Office or Commercial A-2 Agricultural Estate Total 118.62 Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development - Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 4 of 37 Buikling Area Parking Units/ (S.F.) Stalls Beds 108,000 573 7,000 99 93,000 128 68,000 rda 50,000 197 30,000 191 33,000 249 60,000 259 6,500 115 6,500 96 6,500 119 7,000 104 254,500 1364 25,000 138 25,000 115 40,000 108 n/a n/a Na Na 312 72 150 100 92 The development plans describe the land use designations, but has not identified any specific uses. Staff has commented on this in the Market Study section. BACKGROUND 2030 Comprehensive Plan (verbatim language) VISION The land use change to either Office or Regional Commercial District as a part of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan was based on the city's vision for a lifestyle center. The Comprehensive Plan states: Net �� Developable Section Area () (Acres) O 9.93 9.55 0 1.33 1.33 0 9.01 8.57 Legend 0 9.56 6.32 1r I � T� SVM© 5.33 2.97 Q 2.58 2.58 0 3.38 3.38 © 3.27 327 Stat Caul O 1.86 1.63 PWft FW 0t War O 1.57 120 - padW O 2.04 1.64 0 1.83 1.83 E:J Prewva6on © 0 26.70 26.70 Waland ane DAMN O 2.45 2.45 RegionalWiinowl 0 2.58 1.91 - COMM 0 3.45 3.02 0 11.04 0.00 Ho Dm*Recgroal Q 15.88 0.00 Medm Denary Ra Www - Buikling Area Parking Units/ (S.F.) Stalls Beds 108,000 573 7,000 99 93,000 128 68,000 rda 50,000 197 30,000 191 33,000 249 60,000 259 6,500 115 6,500 96 6,500 119 7,000 104 254,500 1364 25,000 138 25,000 115 40,000 108 n/a n/a Na Na 312 72 150 100 92 The development plans describe the land use designations, but has not identified any specific uses. Staff has commented on this in the Market Study section. BACKGROUND 2030 Comprehensive Plan (verbatim language) VISION The land use change to either Office or Regional Commercial District as a part of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan was based on the city's vision for a lifestyle center. The Comprehensive Plan states: Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 5 of 37 2.7.4 Regional/Lifestyle Center Commercial "Deftnitionlrision: A mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market. The physical environment emphasizes an attractive, comfortable walking experience for shoppers and visitors and is designed to serve trail users and mass transit as well as automobile traffic. Centers of this type have at least two major retail anchors and are characterized by the diversity and mix of retail and service uses within their boundaries. Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in the other commercial districts. Development of these centers shall be planned as a group of organized uses and structures to accommodate a sensitive transition between commercial activities such as loading, parking of automobiles, lighting and trash collection and surrounding residential uses. Such centers shall be designed with one theme, with similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials, and a coordinated landscaping theme. Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system. Goods and Services Examples • Entertainment • Department Store • Comparison Shopping • Specialty Retail/Boutique • Restaurants • Hotels • Residential A new zoning district Regional Commercial (RC) will be created in the City Code to implement this land use. The city has given a dual land use of the 118 acres at the southeast corner of Powers and Lyman Boulevards to accommodate this use." ANALYSIS OF APPLICATION FOR REGIONAL COMMERCIAL In 2009 the city adopted standards and guidelines for a regional/lifestyle center commercial planned unit development. ZONING DISTRICT The RC Zoning District is found in the PUD District. Sec. 20-509. - Standards and guidelines for regionaMestyle center commercial planned unit developments. (a) Intent. (1) The use of planned unit developments for regional/lifestyle center commercial purposes should result in a reasonable and verifiable exchange between the city Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 6 of 37 and the developer. This district is intended to provide for the development of regional and community scale integrated retail, office, business services, personal services and services to the traveling public near freeway interchanges. It shall strive to create a self-sustaining pattern of land uses with cultural, employment, entertainment, housing, shopping and social components. (2) The regional/lifestyle center commercial district is a mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market. The physical environment emphasizes an attractive, comfortable walking experience for shoppers and visitors. It shall be designed to serve pedestrian and mass transit users as well as automobile traffic. Centers of this type, generally, have at least two major retail anchors and are characterized by the diversity of mixed retail and service uses. Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in the other commercial districts. (3) Development of these centers shall be planned as a group of organized uses and structures to accommodate a sensitive transition between commercial activities such as loading, parking of automobiles, lighting and trash collection and surrounding residential uses. Such centers shall be designed with one theme, with similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials, and a coordinated landscaping theme, but shall avoid monotony in design and visual appearance. Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system. (b) Minimum lot size: 10,000 square feet (c) Minimum lot width at building setback: 100 feet. (d) Minimum lot depth: 100 feet. (e) Minimum setbacks: Building setbacks are also a function of the building height. As a building's height increases above 35 feet, the front, rear and project perimeter setback shall increase on a one-to-one basis. The increased setback shall only apply to that portion of the building that exceeds 35 feet, e.g., a 40 -foot tall building would be set back ten feet (front or rear) at that point where the building height equals 40 feet. A building height may step back, providing the setback/building height ratio is maintained. (1) PUD exterior: 30 feet. The 30 -foot PUD exterior setback may be changed, increased or decreased, by the city council as part of the approval process when it is demonstrated that environmental protection or development design will be enhanced. Building setbacks adjacent to exterior development lot lines abutting an area designated for residential use in the comprehensive plan shall be 50 feet, unless unique circumstances are found which would allow the city to reduce the setback requirement. (2) Front yard: 5 feet. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 7 of 37 (3) Rear yard: 5 feet. (4) Side yard: 0. (5) Parking: (6) Setbacks (feet): Front: 10 Side: 10 Rear: 10 (7) Parking setback exemptions: a. There is no minimum parking setback when it abuts, without being separated by a street, another off-street parking area. b. Parking along public streets shall provide an appropriate transition, which shall incorporate such elements as landscaping, decorative fencing, public art, berming, etc. c. Parking setbacks adjacent to exterior development lot lines abutting an area designated for residential use in the comprehensive plan shall be 50 feet unless unique circumstances are found which would allow the city to reduce the setback requirement. Unique circumstances include site elevation, separation by natural features such as wetlands or stands of mature trees or substantial visual screening through berming and landscaping. (8) Parking standards shall comply with City Code for type and location. (f) Maximum building height: Commercial—retail 2 stories Commercial—services 3 stories Office 5 stories Residential 5 stories (g) Protection and preservation of natural features. The applicant must demonstrate that the flexibility provided by the PUD is used to protect and preserve natural features such as tree stands, wetlands, ponds and scenic views. These areas are to be permanently protected as public or private tracts or protected by permanently recorded easements. (h) Landscaping -plan. An overall landscaping plan is required. The plan shall contain the following: Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 8 of 37 (1) Boulevard plantings. Located in front yards shall require a mix of over -story trees and other plantings consistent with the site. Landscaped berms shall be provided to screen the site from major roadways, railroads and less intensive land uses. In place of mass grading for building pads and roads, stone or decorative blocks retaining walls shall be employed as required to preserve mature trees and the site's natural topography. (2) Exterior landscaping and double fronted lots. Landscaped berms shall be provided to buffer the site and lots from major roadways, railroads, and less intensive uses. Similar measures shall be provided for double -fronted lots. Where necessary to accommodate this landscaping, additional lot depth may be required. (3) Foundation and yard plantings. A minimum budget or plan for foundation plants shall be established and approved by the city. As each parcel is developed in the PUD, the builder shall be required to install plant materials meeting or exceeding the required budget or prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy or provide financial guarantees acceptable to the city. (4) Tree preservation. Tree preservation is a primary goal of the PUD. A detailed tree survey should be prepared during the design of the PUD and the plans should be developed to maximize tree preservation. (i) Architectural standards. The applicant should demonstrate that the PUD will provide for a high level of architectural design and building materials. While this requirement is not intended to minimize design flexibility, a set of architectural standards should be prepared for city approval. The primary purpose of this section is to assure the city that high quality design will be employed and that home construction can take place without variances or impact to adjoining lots. The PUD agreement should include the following: (1) Standards for exterior architectural treatments; (2) Streetscape requirements: a. Every building shall incorporate a streetscape, public realm space between the building and the roadway. The use of canopies, awnings or arcades is encouraged in these interfaces. b. Outdoor seating areas must be in a controlled or cordoned area with at least one access to an acceptable pedestrian walk. Seating areas may be shared by multiple uses. When a liquor license is involved, an enclosure is required around the outdoor seating area and the enclosure shall not be interrupted; access to such seating area must be through the principle building. Outdoor seating areas must be located and designed so as not to interfere with pedestrian and vehicular circulation. c. Streetscape elements shall include: Landscaping, lighting and street furniture such as benches, bus shelters, kiosks, planters, public art, tables and chairs, etc. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 9 of 37 To receive the Regional Commercial PUD zoning, the ordinance requires that the property be under one owner control and be developed under a PUD. The developer is required to demonstrate that they are meeting the vision of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as well as the intent of the zoning district (Section 20-505) Concept PUD — What is required? Chapter 20 - Zoning, Article VIII. — Planned Unit Development District, Division 2. — Procedures Sec. 20-517. - General concept plan. (a) In order to receive guidance in the design of a PUD prior to submission of a formal application, an applicant may submit a concept plan for review and comment by the planning commission and city council. Submission of a concept plan is optional but is highly recommended for large PUDs. In order for the review to be of most help to the applicant, the concept plan should contain such specific information as is suggested by the city. Generally, this information should include the following information appropriate to the type of development, e.g., commercial, industrial or residential: (1) Approximate building areas, pedestrian ways and road locations; (2) Height, bulk and square footage of buildings; (3) Type, number or square footage or intensities of specific land uses; (4) Number of dwelling units; (5) Generalized development plan showing areas to be developed or preserved; and (6) Staging and timing of the development. (b) The tentative written consent of all property owners within the proposed PUD shall be filed with the city before the staff commences review. Approval of the concept statement shall not obligate the city to approve the final plan or any part thereof or to rezone the property to a planned unit development district. (c) The final acceptance of land uses is subject to the following procedures: (1) The developer meets with city staff to discuss the proposed developments. (2) The applicant shall file the concept stage application and concept plan, together with all supporting data. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 10 of 37 (3) The planning commission shall conduct a hearing and make recommendations to the City Council. Notice of the hearing shall consist of a legal property description, description of request, and be published in the official newspaper at least ten days prior to the hearing. Written notification of the hearing shall be mailed at least ten days prior thereto to owners of land within 500 feet of the boundary of the property and an on-site notification sign erected. (4) Following the receipt of the report and recommendations from the planning commission, the city council shall consider and comment on the concept plan. The PUD process provides an opportunity to receive clear direction from Planning Commission, City Council and residents of Chanhassen. The city's expectation is that the proposed development will be of higher quality and create a sense of place and identity for the community. The development shall provide regional and community scale including retail, office, and service uses that complement existing commercial uses in the downtown and provide shopping opportunities not currently located in the community. The development must also be sensitive to environmental features on site including topography, vegetation, wetlands and scenic views. Finally, the project should have appropriate transitions between uses. One of the comments of the Concept PUD review will be an update to the Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) which was done in 2003. The traffic component will be one of the most critical elements that needs to be updated. The amount of traffic being generated and the impacts to the surrounding transportation system will need to be examined. The traffic study and its impacts may affect the land use recommendations. In order to best determine the intensity of development for the AUAR, staff is recommending that the applicant proceed to the PUD development stage (per City Code Section 20-508). This stage requires submittal of a preliminary plat and fees. After review of the development stage, a condition of final approval will be completion of the update to the AUAR. RETAIL MARKET STUDY In June 2014, the McComb Group, Ltd. completed a Trade Area Demographic, Characteristic and Sales Potential for the Chan -212 area. The executive summary comments include, "Chan -212 trade area's many economic attributes, population, and upper income households provide support for retail stores, restaurants and key services." The developer had not disclosed his specific uses with this application, but based on the marketing study it is apparent a grocery store/supermarket is a potential use. In a previous meeting with staff, the developer indicated that: • The Shopping Goods Store Type — categorized as clothing and accessories, furniture, home furnishings, electronics, sporting goods, hobby and music is significantly underrepresented in the project's primary trade area and the sales of this merchandise category from the primary trade area are being captured in other distant trade areas. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page I 1 of 37 The Chanhassen trade area is growing and creating additional sales potential for grocery stores. In addition, the Chanhassen "outflow grocery sales" are higher than normal. This suggests that trade area residents may be dissatisfied with existing grocery shopping options. The study indicated the ability of the trade area to support a new grocery store in excess of 90,000 square feet without creating hardship for existing grocery retailers. In addition, other potential uses include warehouse clubs and supercenters, building supply and home centers. (Staff report continued on the next page) Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 12 of 37 The Convenience Goods trade area, shown on Map 5, includes Chanhassen, Chaska, and portions of Eden Prairie, Shakopee, Carver, Victoria, Shorewood, Minnetonka, and Excelsior, along with portions of Jackson, Louisville, Dahlgren, and Laketown Townships. This trade area extends north to Lake Minnetonka, east to Highway 212 and I-494, south to Highway 41 in Shakopee, and west to Laketown Road in Laketown Township. The Convenience Goods trade area covers approximately 88 square miles centered on Chanhassen. Map 5 CHAN-212 CONVENIENCE GOODS TRADE AREA ._r T • -�+•. • so ioume: Scan'US, Inc- and McComb Gm (Staff report continued on the next page) Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 13 of 37 The Shopping Goods trade area covers the southwest Metropolitan Area, as shown on Map 6, extending 60 miles west and encompassing over 2,100 square miles. General boundaries are six miles north of Highway 7, east to Highway 100 in Bloomington/Edina, south to Highway 22 just south of LeSueur, and west five miles from Highway 4 in Hector. Map 6 CHAN-212 SHOPPING GOODS TRADE AREA ranllp; (R •Ll w'Sd 1Y dM11-IIIAa. ScarMS, Inc. and laawlson FRa: Irhebu.:,t,. ms rva r wr" WY^Y �"Ia tracr:nz 5, 1�. owo. i tr„s+, owVLs PlW CMOyR 81�NO�a' 5,lym., {IrPJohT IurrIYT�.g /,M ' AP n1" IMIa`Il.a. *0, -d f.lbal I af""e �ha:lnyvcl R(Ill9t�n M'r�� i ILl' ptJ fkr I MJIIyIYA i 41m Nui{'.fss/ u•.1 L! C~ St "it (Staff report continued on the next page) Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development - Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 14 of 37 Table 28 CHAN-212 POTENTIAL GROSS LEASABLE AREA Gross Leasable Area Store Category Low High Convenience Goods 105,000 135,000 Shopping Goods Anchor Stores 120,000 220,000 Junior Anchors 220,000 315,000 Inline Stores 110,000 180,000 Subtotal 450,000 715,000 Food Service Restaurants 20,000 30,000 Fast Food 15,000 20,000 Subtotal 35,000 50,000 Services 20,000 30,000 Destination Stores Health Club 50,000 60,000 Home Center 115,000 115,000 Cinema 50,000 60,000 Subtotal 215,000 235,000 TOTAL 825,000 1,165,000 Source: McComb Group, Ltd Shopping goods retailers are stores where comparison shopping is a common part of the shopping trip. Department stores typically anchor these shopping centers. Potential anchor store GLA ranges from 120,000 square feet to 220,000 square feet (This would be in total square feet not building foot print). Junior anchor retailers are various size stores, ranging in size from 10,000 square feet to 50,000 square feet, also adding to the center's drawing power. Junior anchor GLA could range from 220,000 square feet to 315,000 square feet. Inline, small store tenants could range from 110,000 square feet to 180,000 square feet. Total shopping goods stores could range from 450,000 square feet to 715,000 square feet. Food service establishments are expected to range from 35,000 square feet to 50,000 square feet. Services of various types could range from 20,000 square feet to 30,000 square feet. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 15 of 37 Destination retailers like health clubs, home centers, and cinemas, could total 215,000 square feet to 235,000 square feet if all three are located at Chan -212. It is possible that not all the anticipated potential tenants will locate at Chan -212 indicating that the shopping center is likely to be between 800,000 square feet and 1,000,000 square feet. Source: McComb Group, Ltd. *See Attachment #7 — "Sales Potential and Supportable GLA" for more specifics on uses and square footage. Planning Departments Comments When the city was considering the land use change on the site in 2006-07, there was much discussion about this area having uses different from the downtown. The downtown area is intended to be the uses that meet the daily needs of residents, and the regional mall site was envisioned to be those uses that would be more of a comparison shopping that would serve a regional market including: Goods and Services Examples • Entertainment • Department Store • Comparison Shopping • Specialty Retail/Boutique • Restaurants • Hotels • Residential In lieu of any descriptions of this information, staff has the following comments based on a Commercial/Regional Retail Development Diagram (see Attachment #13) showing building areas, type, number, square footage or intensities of specific land uses. 1. A pattern of buildings and uses that might be oriented around a central public promenade, street, or public space of some sort, and when looked at together form a "regional" commercial destination. Given the land area available in Chanhassen (100± acres), and in understanding the market, this concept would not necessarily be seen as a "dale" type of shopping center, but possibly more like a "Shoppes at Arbor Lake," or the new outlet center in Eagan (paragon outlets/Eagan outlets) off of 77 and 13, or the Woodbury Lakes Development. 2. Such a center might include a collection of buildings with footprints ranging from as small as a 3,000 to 5,000 square -foot restaurant to a 100,000 square -foot multi -tenant building. Anchors might be more in the 35,000 to 75,000 square -foot range (i.e. JC Penney, Kohl's, Sears, Dick's Sporting Goods, Gander Mountain, Cabela's etc.). A more likely scenario would be the smaller restaurant users or supporting commercial users in the 3,000 to 10,000 Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 16 of 37 square -foot range with individual spaces within a larger building, but maintaining individual entrances facing the public space, promenade, plaza, or street. 3. Mixing in entertainment, hotel, and to a degree some residential uses could allow for shared parking. This assumes that people come to this area for the experience and that they park once and visit many locations; as opposed to more convenience retail where people are only coming to this store for a quick shopping visit (i.e. discount retailers, pharmacy, grocery, hardware, building materials etc.). Based on the lack of specificity in the types and sizes of uses, staff is recommending a list of permitted and prohibited uses consistent with the Comprehensive Plan (see recommendation for use and square footage below). The applicant will be required to create a PUD district with a list of specific uses. Staff is has provided recommendations for uses base on the in intent of the RC Zoning District Sec. 20-509. Again the intent of this district: • The use of planned unit developments for regional/lifestyle center commercial purposes should result in a reasonable and verifiable exchange between the city and the developer. This district is intended to provide for the development of regional and community scale integrated retail, office, business services, personal services and services to the traveling public near freeway interchanges. • The regional/lifestyle center commercial district is a mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market. Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in the other commercial districts. (Staff report continued on the next page) Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 17 of 37 Recommendation for Use and Square Footage Square Footage Square Footage USE Merchandise Category SIC Code Tenant (rnmanum) Tenant (maximm) Convenience Goods Specialty Food Stores: bakeries, candy, dairy, 542, 543, deli, fiults & vegetables, meat & fish, nut & 544, 545, confectionary 546 and 549 700 18,000 Food Service: restaurants, eating and drinking, no drive thru 581 and 582 200 10,000 Other drug, florist, liquor, miscellaneous, 5912, 5921, newsstand, optical and tobacco 599 700 Specialty Grocery 541 10,000 25,000 Shopping Goods General departrnent store 5311 90,000 150,000 Apparel & Accessories: clothing and shoes 561 900 28,000 Furniture & Home Furnishings 571 1,200 37,000 Electronics & Appliances 572 & 573 900 26,000 5941, 5942, 5943, 5944, Other. art, book, camera, cosmetic, game, gift, 5945, 5946, hobby, jewelry, leather, luggage, novelty, pet, 5947, 5948, photography, sewing, souvenir, sporting goods 5949 and and stationary 5999 600 45,000 Services Personal: adult care, miscellaneous, photography, 722,729 tax preparation, veterinary and 835 900 8,000 Personal: salons and spas 723 and 724 900 8,000 Recreation clubs and spas 7991 1,400 33,000 801, 802, 803,804 Health care: clinics and offices and 809 900 60,000 61, 62, 63, 651, 653, 654, 67, 73, 87 (not Offices: professional services 8734) 200 60,000 Theater. motion and theatrical 783 and 792 1300 50,000 Hotel (250rooms) 701 5,000 65,000 Bank and financial institutions 60 900 20,000 Residential To be detennined with PUD, assume 550 units of high and medium density TOTAL I I i 116.700 643,000 Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 18 of 37 Prohibited Uses SIC Code Automobile, Boat, Recreational Vehicles, Motorcycle and Truck, Mobile Home dealers and Suppilies 527, 55, 751 Automotive Repair and Services 76 Building Materials 521, 523, 525, & 526 Car wash 754 Convenience store with gas 5411, 5541 Day Care 835 Discount Store 533 Dry cleaning 721 Elementary and secondary schools, public or private 82 Fast Food Restaurant with drive thru 5812 Gas Station 5541 Grocery Stores 5411 Hardware 5251 Hospitals 805,806 Liquor Store 592 Membership organizations 86 Motor vehicle repair and parts 76 NursingHonies 805 Residential Care fact7itics 805,836 Supermarkets 5411 Theater Warehouse Club 533 Wholesalers 51 Eneineerine Comments The concept plan includes the extension of Bluff Creek Boulevard from its current terminus to Powers Boulevard. Bluff Creek Boulevard is a Municipal State Aid Route therefore the design is subject to review and approval of MNDOT's State Aid Office. The roadways should be aligned to encourage traffic to use Bluff Creek Boulevard for the development. The roadway however should be designed to discourage cut -through traffic to Audubon Road or Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 19 of 37 Pioneer Trail. The plan shall include a connection to the existing stub street on the northwest corner of the area to the single-family development to the west (Mills Drive) and a connection to the existing emergency exit within the Camden Ridge single-family development to the south. An internal public road that loops through the development is proposed. The plan includes a roundabout on Bluff Creek Boulevard just west of Powers Boulevard. A public loop road- Avienda Parkway- is proposed on the north side of the Bluff Creek Boulevard extension to provide access to the retail, office and medium -density residential uses. Another roundabout or some other traffic calming feature on Bluff Creek Boulevard should be considered at the western intersection of Bluff Creek Boulevard and Avienda Parkway as a demarcation between the Avienda mixed use development and the existing residential uses to the west. A full access is proposed at Lyman Boulevard and aligns with Sunset Trail to the north. The AUAR update will examine this intersection and include recommendations evaluate if the intersection meets signal warrants. The AUAR will also look at pedestrian movements at this intersection to see if an enhanced pedestrian crossing is warranted if a signal is not. (Staff report continued on the next page) Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 20 of 37 As part of the AUAR update the developer shall complete a traffic study based on the proposed land uses. The study shall include the following: • Updated current and 20 -year projected traffic volumes • Analysis of turning movements • Level of service analysis, including recommendations for improvements should the projected level of service fall below the acceptable level • Analysis of existing and proposed tum lanes to the development and recommendations for stacking lengths and signalization warrants • Analysis of potential cut -through traffic on Bluff Creek Boulevard/Bluff Creek Drive to the west of the site. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 21 of 37 Based on the existing elevations where the development improvements connect to Powers Boulevard, Lyman Boulevard, Bluff Creek Boulevard and Mills Drive the developer will have unique opportunities to utilize the grade differences to enhance the development, such as walkout medium density units and preservation of the majority of the wetland complex at Powers Boulevard/Bluff Creek Boulevard intersection. The water main proposed for the developed shall be modeled to confirm the sizing is adequate for peak use and fire flows. Water Resources Comments Wetland Protection The final updated delineation reveals eight (8) wetland basins covering 6.15 acres of land. One wetland, WL9 received an agricultural exemption. Wetland 1 and 2 were found by the Technical Evaluation Panel to be hydrologically connected and, therefore, the applicant's consultant was required to revise the boundary as shown in purple on the following exhibit from Kjolhaug Environmental Services. The city is still awaiting the GIS compatible, georeferenced shapefiles for final approval of the delineated boundary. Chanhassen City Code enumerates ten purposes for the Wetland Protection ordinance. Among these ten is the restriction and mitigation of the harmful effects of development on wetlands. All activities within the city shall be governed by the MN Wetland Conservation Act. Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Under Minnesota State Law and Chanhassen City Code §20-402 through 20-421 wetland impacts should be avoided were feasible to do so. This proposal makes little effort to avoid wetland impacts on the site. As shown in the conceptual plan for the site, all but one of the basins will be filled in their entirety for a total direct wetland impact of 5.57 acres. The remaining wetland, a low quality Type 1 basin, dominated entirely by reed canary grass, would have a high probability of secondary impact as the concept plan routes surface water runoff away from the remaining wetland. The Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act was passed in 1991 (MN Statute 103A and MN Rule Chapter 8420) with the purpose of; • achieving "no net loss in the quantity, quality, and biological diversity of Minnesota's existing wetlands"; • increasing "the quantity, quality, and biological diversity of Minnesota's wetlands by restoring or enhancing diminished wetlands"; • avoiding "direct or indirect impacts from activities that destroy or diminish the quantity, quality, and biological diversity of wetlands;" and • replacing "wetland values where avoidance is not feasible and prudent." Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 22 of 37 It is very important to note that MN Rules part 8420.520. Subpart 3.0 (2) clearly defines what is "feasible and prudent" as follows. "An alternative is considered feasible and prudent if it meets all of the following requirements: (a) it is capable of being done from an engineering point of view; (b) it is in accordance with accepted engineering standards and practices; (c) it is consistent with reasonable requirements of the public health, safety, and welfare; (d) it is an environmentally preferable alternative based upon a review of social, economic, and environmental impacts; and (e) it would create no truly unusual problems." That subpart goes on to describe the city's obligations under when reviewing avoidance alternatives. "(3) The local government unit must consider the following in avoidance alternatives as applicable: (a) whether the basic project purpose can be reasonably accomplished using one or more other sites in the same general area that would avoid wetland impacts.... (b) The general suitability of the project site and alternate sites considered by the applicant to achieve the purpose of the project; (c) Whether reasonable modification of the size, scope, configuration or density of the project would avoid impacts to wetlands; (d) Efforts by the applicant to accommodate or remove constraints on alternatives imposed by zoning standards or infrastructure, including requests for conditional use permits, variances, or planned unit developments; (e) The physical, economic, and demographic requirements of the project. Economics alone do not make an alternative not feasible and prudent; and (f) The amount, distribution, condition, and public value of wetlands and associated resources to be affected by the project and the potential for direct and indirect effects over time. (4) If the local government unit determines that a feasible and prudent alternative exists that would avoid impacts to wetlands, it must deny the replacement plan. If it is determined that there is no feasible and prudent alternative that would avoid impacts as described above, then Chanhassen must determine if the applicant has demonstrated that they have minimized impacts to the wetlands. The *minimization follows the same basic rigor and review as described for avoidance. Further augmenting the "feasible and prudent alternatives" case is that the original AUAR showed three concepts that significantly minimized wetland impacts on the site. (See page 3 of the Avienda Concept Submittal packet.) The two higher quality wetlands were, in particular, saved from impacts. A memorandum from Ben Meyer of the Minnesota Board of Soil and Water Resources, dated 10/19/16 and attached, echoes these concerns. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 23 of 37 Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act The U.S. Arany Corps of Engineers will likely have authority over some of the wetland on the subject properties. While the Joint Notification Application allows for concurrent review processes, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issues their own permit with their own criteria. Approval from the City as the LGU responsible for administration of the Wetland Conservation Act does not translate directly into federal approval. Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency must review and determine that any fill placement is compliant with the state water quality standards. The wetland on the subject property drain to either Lake Susan or into Bluff Creek. Both of these water bodies are impaired. (Staff report continued on the next page) Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 24 of 37 Figure - Existing Conditions (2013 Carve Photograph) N 0 500 The District at Vincent Ridge (KES 2015-013) 1 Feet Chanhassen, Minnesota & A Noaa Bou Manes iWO-aWd m this (pure are appw mat KJouinucF\RlRON1F\TA SFiRlCFSCOYPAN aWdonmmnaitmean olf"al surrey pmdup. 11V mac YnGaa. F9111a1RYy Y�aop figure 1 - Updated wetland delineation including additional areas in purple Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 25 of 37 Mitigation for Approved Wetland Impacts Just as there are sequencing requirements for wetland impacts, there are also sequencing requirements for wetland replacement (mitigation). Section 20-416 (b) (3) of Chanhassen City Code describes where mitigation can occur. These are, in descending order of preference; 1. On-site 2. Locally within the same sub -watershed elsewhere in the city; 3. Off-site within the same major watershed or through the purchase of wetland credits. Minnesota Rules 8420.0522 sets out the replacement standards if it is determined that the impacts are unavoidable or cannot be restored over time. The replacement wetland(s) must replace the public value of wetlands lost. One of the functions some of the wetlands serve on the subject property have to do with flow augmentation and/or amelioration within Bluff Creek. It will be important that any impacts deemed unavoidable are mitigated for within the Bluff Creek watershed. The minimum replacement ratio will be 2:1 if the replacement is "in-kind" and within the same watershed or 2.5:1 if the replacement is "out -of -kind" or outside the watershed. Given the impaired status of the downstream receiving waters, any approved unavoidable wetland impacts should be mitigated in the same minor watershed. Subpart 7 of the same section of Minnesota Rules sets requirements for the siting of replacement wetlands as follows in descending order of preference: 1. In the same minor watershed as the impacted wetland; 2. In the same major watershed as the impacted wetland; 3. In the same county as the impacted wetland; 4. If replaced through banking, then in the same wetland bank service area; or 5. hi an adjacent bank service area provided it is also a less than 50% wetlands remaining bank service area. The Federal Clean Water Act also has mitigation requirements. Generally, replacement wetland meeting the above will satisfy the Section 404 requirements although this is not always the case. It will be the applicant's responsibility to assure that they meet the Section 404 requirements. The applicant needs to show an adequate sequencing argument for the extent of the proposed impacts. Water Quality Protection This site drains to one of two water bodies (see figure 2). Generally, the northeast portion flows to Lake Susan which has an impairment for excessive nutrients. The remainder of the site drains to Bluff Creek which has a turbidity impairment and an impairment for indices of biological integrity. Any stormwater management plan must consider these impairments as both are within one -mile of the site. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 26 of 37 NPDES Construction Permit This development will be subject to the rules of the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System Program (NPDES Construction Permit) issued August 1, 2013. This permit requires that the permittee manages the stormwater such that during project construction and upon completion there is no violation of state water quality standards. Part IIID states: Where a project's ultimate development replaces vegetation and/or other pervious surfaces with one (1) or more acres of cumulative impervious surface, the Permittee(s) must design the project so that the water quality volume of one (1) inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project is retained on site (i.e. infiltration or other volume reduction practices) and not discharged to a surface water. For purposes of this part, surface waters does not include man-made drainage systems that convey stormwater to a compliant permanent stormwater management system. For those projects where infiltration is prohibited (see Part III.D.1 j.), the Permittee(s) shall consider other methods of volume reduction and the water quality volume (or remainder of the water quality volume ifsome volume reduction is achieved) must be treated by a wet sedimentation basin, filtration system, regional ponding or equivalent methods prior to the discharge of stormwater to surface waters. NPDES MS4 Permit Chanhassen is permitted to discharge stormwater under the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Small Municipal Storm Sewer Systems Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System Program (MS4) issued August 1, 2013. The MS4 permit requires Chanhassen, as a permittee, to develop a post - construction stormwater management program. This program must give the highest preference to "Green Infrastructure" practices such as conservation design, infiltration and reuse. New development must result in no net increase from pre -project conditions of stormwater volume, stormwater discharge of total suspended solids and total phosphorus. Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Rule J Rule J requires that the 1.1 inches of runoff from impervious surface of a parcel must be abstracted on-site. In addition, the stormwater management must achieve 60% removal of total phosphorus and 90% removal of TSS on an annual basis. These removals are consistent with the National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) recommendations and the volume is consistent with the NPDES permit requirements. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 27 of 37 Planned Unit Development District Section 20-501 lists 9 elements which are to be included in a planned unit development. These elements are consistent with low impact design (LID) and better site design practices. The preservation of significant ecological resources and open space is a primary reason for allowing the use of PUD. The first three speak directly to this goal: (1) Preservation ofdesirablesite characteristics and open space and protection of sensitive environmental features, including steep slopes, mature trees, creeks, wetlands, lakes and scenic views. (2) More effident and effective use ofland, open space and public facilities through mibng ofland uses and assembirand development of land in largerparcels. (3) High qualityofdesign and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. Site planning, landscaping and building architecture should reflect higher quality design than is found elsewhere in the community. This would lend to preservation of wetlands, woodlands and topographic features through thoughtful consideration during site layout and through the use of practices such as terrain - adaptive architecture. Bluff Creek Overlay District The woodland area lies within the boundaries of the Bluff Creek Overlay District. In addition, wetland 4 lies entirely within the Bluff Creek Overlay District and feeds the large mitigation area to the south. This overlay district is intended to protect Bluff Creek, preserve natural conditions and to establish a corridor of "interconnected open space" throughout the entire system for ecological, recreational and educational benefit. Section 20-1561 (a) stipulates that "natural habitat areas within the primary zone shall be preserved as permanent open space." This would be consistent with the intent of the PUD and could very possibly be used as mitigation for wetland impacts although that must be determined in context of wetland preservation as a whole. (Staff report continued on the next page) Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 28 of 37 Landscanin¢ Comments Subject Site Existing natural features on the site include a tree windrow in the center of the property, landscaping around the existing homes, natural vegetation around the wetlands and a large native woodland in the southwest comer. The developer is proposing to preserve some of the wooded area in the southeast comer. This woodlot falls entirely within the Bluff Creek Corridor Primary Zone and is intended for preservation. The woodlot is of high quality and consists of native species of trees and shrubs with minimal invasive species present. Landscaping requirements for Commercial/Office areas: • Parking lot landscaping requirements o Use less individual islands and more extended planting spaces and areas o Use extended planting areas for both landscaping requirements and stormwater management infiltration basins o Incorporate landscape materials and design that requires minimal irrigation • Bufferyard landscape requirements o Bufferyards will be required around perimeter as well as differing uses within the development • Foundation plantings • Boulevard trees along public streets • Landscape area/green space requirements Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 29 of 37 o Preferable to have minimum mowed turf areas. Use prairie or no mow mixes in low use areas o Employ capture -and -use irrigation systems for development In Residential areas: • Tree Preservation/Canopy Coverage requirements Use a diverse mix of species for planting • Bufferyard requirements • Foundation plantings • Boulevard trees along public streets • Landscape area/green space requirements Preferable to have minimum mowed turf areas. Use prairie or no mow mixes in low use areas Employ capture -and -use irrigation systems for development Bluff Creek Overlay District • Entire wooded area in southwest corner within Primary Corridor therefore should be identified for preservation • Conservation area should remain undisturbed and the feature should be worked around to signify a higher quality of development standards for the site. Carver County Comments (from 2015) This development was studied to some extent during the Lyman Boulevard Project development process. The owners (Dorsey and Fox) were very involved. They requested Lyman Boulevard be designed to accept a 100% retail development on the property even though the comprehensive plan guides the lifestyle center. We had SRF Consulting perform a traffic study of the AUAR option, the comprehensive plan option and the 100% retail option to determine impacts to our project. There are severe impacts to Powers Boulevard dependent on the land use and some to Lyman Boulevard. Obviously the development will require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), but the SRF study is a good place to start. Other comments we have at this point are: Future right-of-way needs for Lyman and Powers Boulevards will need to be addressed, especially in the areas of the intersections. Walk and trail locations need to be determined and accommodated along the roadways, adequate right-of-way or easements need to be preserved. Utilities will need to be addressed during design. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development – Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 30 of 37 Park Comments The proposed Lifestyle Center (PUD) is located within the city's 2005 Metropolitan Urban Service Area. This region of the city is currently in transition from primarily agricultural uses to residential, commercial, industrial, and office uses. In concert with this change in land use, the city's Community Development Department implemented two key planning processes—the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan (Bluff Creek Overlay) and the Alternative Urban Area Wide Review (AUAR). Comprehensive Park Plan The city's comprehensive park plan calls for a neighborhood park to be located within one-half mile of every residence in the city and a community park/public school facility to be located within one to two miles of each residence. The proposed lifestyle center site is situated within the community park service area of Bandimere Community Park and the Chanhassen High School campus. However, the proposed residential housing within the concept is outside the one-half mile service area of any existing neighborhood parks in the area. Neighborhood Parks Provide opportunities for informal recreation close to home. Developed primarily for unstructured active recreation such as field games, court games, play equipment and trail opportunities. Must be easily accessible to residential areas with safe walking and biking access on trail networks. Sites need well -draining soils and flat terrain to accommodate active play features. To fulfill the comprehensive plan guidance for providing neighborhood park services, the application needs to include a public neighborhood park component. The proposed recreational site would be best associated with the existing woodlands situated in the southwest comer of the PUD. The park space needs to be of sufficient size to accommodate traditional park attractions including an open play field, playground and hard surface sport court. The site should seek to be accessible to the residential units in a barrier -free pedestrian manner. A park dedication requirement either in the form of land dedication or the payment of park fees or a combination of both will be a component of any agreed upon conditions of approval for the proposal. Park fee credit is not granted for the inclusion and/or construction of private recreation amenities. Comprehensive Trail Plan The city's comprehensive trail plan includes existing trails located to the north, east and southwest of the proposed Lifestyle Center PUD. All proposed structures and spaces within the PUD need to be connected by a combination of pedestrian walkways, sidewalks and trails to Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 31 of 37 these existing pedestrian trail corridors. Existing trail improvements include the Lyman Boulevard Trail, the Powers Boulevard trails and the Bluff Creek Boulevard trails. Consideration should be given to providing a pedestrian connection through the preserved woodlands to the Camden Ridge development via Miranda Way. Park and Recreation Commission Review On Tuesday, October 25, 2016, the Chanhassen Park and Recreation Commission took public comment and discussed desired park, open space, recreation, and trail components for the proposed Avienda concept planned unit development (PUD). Commissioners focused on making the development a highly desirable and livable environment for future residents and how best to integrate the site into the existing neighborhoods and landforms. Below is the Park and Recreation Commission's list of recommendations at the concept level: • Incorporate meaningful park -like places, including the provision of appropriate recreation equipment, site furnishings, and landscaping adjacent to both the townhome and apartment neighborhoods. • Preserve the woodlands identified in the Bluff Creek Overlay District to the greatest extent possible. The Commission envisions nature trails within a portion of the woodlands. • Significantly increase the walkability of the core retail space to encourage pedestrian interaction by providing wide sidewalks, numerous gathering locations, interesting site famishing, landscaping, and hardscapes. • Provide well-designed sidewalks and pedestrian connections to all buildings and locations. • Incorporate traffic calming into all pedestrian crossing locations. • Design, incorporate, and construct a comprehensive on-site system of trails, including: 1. A trail running west to east from Bluff Creek Boulevard through the upper portions of the woodlands continuing east along the southern border of the property, then turning north adjacent to Powers Boulevard. 2. An internal trail positioned north to south within the townhome neighborhood allowing residents to gain access as pedestrians to adjacent destinations. 3. A thoughtfully designed, formal access that welcomes pedestrians from the intersection of Lyman and Powers Boulevard directly into the proposed development. 4. Completion of the emergency roadway connection with Miranda Way to be utilized as a trail way except in the event that north/south emergency vehicle access is needed. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 32 of 37 Buildine Official Comments 1. The buildings are required to have automatic fire extinguishing systems. 2. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Soil evaluation (geo-technical) report required. 4. Retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. BIG BOX RETAIL / MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT Consideration for a lifestyle center was what was contimplated with the 1st Comprehensive Plan. pain recommenditon for the potentail Regional Commerical land use. A lifestyle center is a shopping center or mixed -used commercial development that combines the traditional retail functions of a shopping mall with leisure amenities oriented towards upscale consumers as well as residential uses in a walkable environment. The plan for this development must be consistent with the vision for the site. There are numerous examples of regional commercial developments int the metro area. Examples of Mixed Use Development The Villages at Arbor Lakes PUD Concept Plan, while having big box uses in close proximity, provides a comparison of distribution of uses by type. This example is for illustrative comparison only. (Staff report continued on the next page) Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 33 of 37 Summary of Uses Avienda Arbor Lakes Apartments 404 units 752 units Townhouses 72 units 0 Hotel 250 rooms 206 rooms Office 173,OOOsq. ft. 64,OOOsq. ft. Restaurants 33,500 sq. ft. 40,000 sq. ft. Retai I 1362,500 sq. ft. 1 1383,000 sq. ft. Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 34 of 37 ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION 1. What is the city's vision for this area: Is it big box retail, mixed-use development or lifestyle area? The Comprehensive Plan gives specific goods and services examples: a. Entertainment, department stores, comparison shopping, specialty retail/boutique. restaurants, hotels and residential. 2. Design considerations a. Design internal circulation to encourage pedestrian interaction and activity by providing sidewalks, gathering place; and interesting landscaping. b. Establish gateway at the boundaries of the district. c. Create a distinct identity through the use of consistent signage, street graphics, lighting and landscaping. d. Encourage sidewalk activity by developing amenities into all major pedestrian areas. Amenities should include coordinated street furniture trash and recycling containers, bus shelters, paving, landscaping and lighting. e. Provide architectural elements, such as sculpture, public art and unique signage into the development including streetscapes to establish a strong district identity. 3. Outcomes from the 2040 Visioning exercise (April 2016) a. Why we choose to live & work here: Small town feel Within easy striking distance of big city amenities Parks, lakes & trails Open space; recreational opportunities Community values Family -friendly; healthy; engaged; close knit Kid -friendly Strong schools; beautiful parks; safe; neighborly Great downtown Attractive; walkable Safe Low crime Strong city services Community amenities; can get almost everything here Affordable Housing; low taxes Special attractions Chanhassen Dinner Theatres; library; fishing; 0 ofJuly! Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 35 of 37 b. Why Chanhassen? Great community Small town feel in an urban area: Family oriented Beautiful Excellent schools Prince c. Lifestyle Center People care about each other; we are good neighbors; people are engaged, helpful, friendly (13 responses) Everything we need is here yet we are close to big city amenities (6 responses) Great place to raise a family (4 responses) Clean, safe and beautiful (4 responses) Choice, quality (2 responses) He lives here/is my neighbor (2 responses) Priority Medium for 3 groups; high for 2 groups Positives Helps bring new residents attracted to vibrant lifestyle and services Helps retain current residents who appreciate amenities/quality of life Job growth Considerations - Potential negative impact on downtown; should be planned to complement downtown - Environmental impact - Traffic impact on Highway 5 Suggestions Must be welcoming for seniors Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 36 of 37 RECOMMENDATION "The Planning Commission provides observations and feedback on the Concept Planned Unit Development along with the following comments: I . To receive Regional Commercial zoning, the ordinance requires that the property be under one owner and be developed under a Planned Unit Development. The developer is required to demonstrate that they are meeting the vision of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as well as the intent of the zoning district. 2. In order to best determine the intensity of development for the AUAR, staff is recommending that the applicant proceed to the PUD development stage (per City Code Section 20-508). This stage requires submittal of a preliminary plat and fees. After review of the development stage, a condition of final approval will be completion of the update to the AUAR. As part of the AUAR update, the developer shall provide a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) based on the proposed land uses. The study shall include the following: • Updated current and 20 -year projected traffic volumes • Analysis of turning movements • Level of service analysis, including recommendations for improvements should the projected level of service fall below the acceptable level • Analysis of existing and proposed turn lanes to the development and recommendations for stacking lengths 4. With the Preliminary PUD, the developer shall address the comments in the staff report from a. City Engineering b. Water Resources Coordinator c. Environmental Resources Specialist d. Parks and Recreation e. Building f. Planning - including list of permitted and prohibited uses. g. Carver County (Staff report continued on the next page) Planning Commission Regional Commercial Concept Planned Unit Development — Planning Case 2016-25 November 1, 2016 Page 37 of 37 ATTACHMENTS 1. Development Review Application. September 30, 2016 2. Application for Concept Plan Review September 30, 2016 3. Concept Submittal Exhibit dated September 30, 2016 4. Email John Thomas Transportation Manager Eastern Carver County Schools dated 10-6-16 5. Email form Center Point Energy dated 10-10-16 6. Email from MN Board of Water and Soil Resources dated 10-19-16 7. 2007 Community Survey questions asked regarding a regional mall. 8. Chapter VI -Sales Potential and Supportable GLA excerpt from Trade Area Demographic, Characteristic and Sales Potential for the Chan -212 Area, prepared by the McComb Group, Ltd. 9. Affidavit of Mailing Notice of Hearing G:IPLAN12016 Planning Casea12016-25 Avienda - Chan Reail Site\PC Stair Report COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF CHANNASSEN Planning Division – 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address – P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 2, APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENTS "REVIEW Submittal Date: J-= PC Date: � CC Date: / 4' 60 -Day Review Date: (Refer to the appmpnate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ......................... $600 ❑ Subdivision (SUB) ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ..... $100 ❑ Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $300 ❑ Create over 3 lots .......................$600 + $15 per lot ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (— lots) ❑ Single -Family Residence ................................ $325 ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots) .................................. $300 ❑ All Others.. ....................................................... $425 ❑ Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 El Interim Use Permit (IUP) E] Lot Line Adjustment... ...................................... ❑ Final Plat ..........................................................$700 $150 ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)` ❑ All Others ......................................................... $425 *Additional escrow may be required for other applications ❑ Rezoning(REZ) through the development contract. ❑v Planned Unit Development (PUD)..................$750 ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD ................. $100 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ All Others......................................................... $500 ❑ Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 ❑ Sign Plan Review ................................................... $150 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... $150 ❑ Administrative .................................................. $100 ❑ All Others....................................................... $275 ❑ Commercial/Industrial Districts* ...................... $500 ❑Zoning Appeal. $100 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: ..................................................... (_ thousand square feet) *Include ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) ................. $500 number of existing employees: 'Include number of MW employees: ❑ Residential Districts ..... ""' $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, ............... """ nits) Plus $5 per dwelling unit (_ units) the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. ❑� Notification Sign (City to install and remove)...................................................................................................................... $200 ❑ Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate after pm -application meeting) .................................................. $3 per address ( addresses) ❑ Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply).. ............................................ ........................ $50 per document ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation ❑ Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) ❑ Easements (_ easements) TOTAL FEE: $950.00 Description of Proposal: See Attached Narrative Property Address or Location: SW corner of Powers Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard Parcel #: See Attached Legal Description: _ Total Acreage: 118.00 Wetlands Present? ® Yes ❑ No See Attached Present Zoning: Agricultural Estate District (A2) Requested Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Present Land Use Designation: Commercial Requested Land Use Designation: Commercial Existing Use of Property: single family home and vacant, agriculture land 0 Check box is separate narrative is attached. Section 3: Property APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, 1, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and coned. Name: Landform Professional Services, LLC Contact: Kendra Lindahl Address: 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513 Phone: (612) 638-0225 City/StatelZip: Minneapolis, MN 55330 Cell: (612) 290-8102 Email: klirldahl@landform.net Fax: (612) 252-9077 Signature: Kendra Lindahl, AICP Dg pig � b rN qy ACP Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, 1, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. 1 understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Level 7 Development Contact: Bahram Akradi Address: 11-6 00 =JM Kings Point Road phone: g S Z— 2 29 _ 7 q 7 7 Ctty/State/Zip: Minnetrista, MN 55331 Cell: ul �2— 12 _ l2 lZ Email: RhraV4 1129Z"A,t%A4 y.Csrn Fax: Signature: i _ Date: 9• Z8� Z0� This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Landform Professsional Services, LLC Contact: Steven Sabraski Address: 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513 phone: (612) 638-0243 City/State/Zip: Minneapolis, MN 55401 Cell: Email: ssabraski@Iandform.net Fax: (612) 252-9077 Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? `Other Contact Information: ❑� Property Owner Via: 21 Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: ❑� Applicant Via: Z Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: ❑ Engineer Via: []Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State[Zip: ❑ Other Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary forth fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing (required). SAVE FORM PRINT FORM SUBMIT FORM Level 7 Development, LLC AVIENDA Chanhassen, MN APPLICATION FOR CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW September 30, 2016 L A N D F O R M a • From Site to Finish INTRODUCTION On behalf of Level 7 Development, Landform is pleased to submit this application for concept plan review for "Avienda", a mixed use Regional/Lifestyle Center at the southwest comer of intersection of Powers Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard. The property is dual guided Office or Regional Commercial and zoned Agriculture Estate west of Powers Boulevard and is guided Medium Density Residential and zoned Agriculture Estate for the 1.66 acres east of Powers Boulevard. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates development of this site as "Regional/Lifestyle Center Commercial". The plan notes that the vision for the site is: "A mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market. The physical environment emphasizes an attractive, comfortable walking experience for shoppers and visitors and is designed to serve trail users and mass transit as well as automobile traffic. Centers of this type have at least two major retail anchors and are characterized by the diversity and mix of retail and service uses within their boundaries. Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in the other commercial districts. Development of these centers shall be planned as a group of organized uses and structures to accommodate a sensitive transition between commercial activities such as loading, parking of automobiles, lighting and trash collection and surrounding residential uses. Such centers shall be designed with one theme, with similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials and a coordinated landscaping theme. Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system. Goods and Services Examples • Entertainment • Department Store • Comparison Shopping • Specialty Retail/Boutique • Restaurants • Hotels • Residential A new zoning district Regional Commercial (RC) will be created in the City Code to implement this land use. The city has given a dual land use of the 118 acres at the southeast corner of Powers and Lyman Boulevards to accommodate this use." SCD140011EV L A N D F O R M September 30, 2016 Project Narrative 2 CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW In 2015, the City reviewed a similar concept plan from Carlston Development for a portion of this site. The City provided feedback on the concept plan and ordered an AUAR update. Before the AUAR could begin, Level 7 Development acquired the property and decided to pause and take a fresh look at the site. The new development team completed the site analysis and reviewed the feedback that was received during that process. The design team has also reviewed a number of City documents before beginning development of our concept, including: • Chanhassen 2005 AUAR (dated December 8, 2003) prepared for the City by HKGi • The "Chanhassen Retail, Office and Residential Market Analysis and Development Potential" report (dated June 2006) prepared for the City by McComb Group, Ltd. • The 2007 City Survey • The 2010 City Survey • The 2013 City Survey • The Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance • The Chanhassen Subdivision Ordinance • The 2030 Comprehensive Plan (adopted November 10, 2008) • The comments provided during the 2015 review of the Carlston Development proposal Level 7 Development has been working to refine the plans for a mixed-use development concept that is market -ready and consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. We are excited to provide a concept with a mix of potential uses that may include townhomes, apartments, office, medical and professional services, retail, entertainment and hospitality. The proposed mixed-use development will help the City achieve its goals of providing a variety of housing types for all people in all stages of the life cycle, providing a mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market, preserving natural resources through the protection of the Bluff Overlay district, and providing regional shopping options for existing residents and new residents as anticipated by the Comprehensive Plan. This plan incorporates a mix of office, retail and residential space in an underserved area of the City. The project will be designed with one theme, with a similar high-end architectural style, similar exterior building materials and a coordinated landscaping theme as directed by the Comprehensive Plan. While we have not yet defined all of these details, our submittal package includes a schematic concept plan to give some idea of the concepts we are currently evaluating. SCD1400LLEV L A N D F O R M September 30, 2016 Project Narrative 3 Design Concept The provided concept plan meets your Comprehensive Plan goals and includes approximately: 50 acres of Regional Commercial (approximately 435,000 square feet) 15 acres of Office (approximately 40,000 square feet) 12 acres of higher density housing including with a potential for Market Rate Apartments (300 units) and Senior Living (100 units) • 6 acres of Hospitality/Hotel uses (250 rooms) • 4 acres of Stormwater ponding • 16 acres of Conservation land • 1.6 acres of land at the southeast comer of Powers and Lyman Boulevard that is not proposed for development, but could be used in conjunction with the adjacent city land for regional or local stormwater/wetland improvements. The design vision for the Avienda development will be an integration of both traditional and contemporary elements that will ultimately establish a "timeless" character. Both visually and physically, architecture will play a major role in the overall design character for the development. High-quality materials including authentic stone, brick and masonry, architectural metal panels, and glass will be key elements that will establish this character. The pedestrian experience will establish the overall scale of the buildings and spaces, with interesting facades and carefully designed architectural elements, lighting, awnings and other unique features. Ample landscaping will be incorporated to create an inviting environment. We have worked to preserve the trees in the buffer area in the southwest portion of the site to provide a buffer between the proposed development and the existing homes on the south and west. We have also designed a plan that locates the medium and high density housing in these areas to provide a transition between the existing homes and the planned commercial uses. A comprehensive landscape plan will be developed to supplement the existing trees and support the design theme throughout the development. We expect different land uses in the development to have different landscape and architecture details, but many of the core design concepts will be threaded throughout the development. The landscaping plans will likely also include private amenities and street furniture that helps activate the streetscape and enhances the pedestrian experience by providing places to relax, rest, or meet friends. The streetscapes will be designed to reflect the different street characteristics within the development from local residential streets to collector streets intended to move traffic through the project. The concept plan shows construction of Bluff Creek Boulevard, a key east -west road connection between the existing neighborhood and Highway 212. Internal connections are provided within the development, SC0140011EV L A N D F O R M September 30, 2016 Project Narrative 4 including a connection to Lyman Boulevard on the north. Access points on Lyman Boulevard have been designed based on County plans. The road alignments may be modified slightly as we continue to develop the design and determine specific user requirements for this regional destination center. Market Study The concept plan was developed based on a 2014 market study prepared by McComb Group, Ltd, a consultant that the City has used in the past. The study reinforced the need for this development and the findings to support the RegionaVLifestyle Center anticipated by the City's Comprehensive Plan. The 2014 study showed that this area could support 825,000 square feet to 1,120,000 square feet of new retail/commercial. Key takeaways from the June 2014 McComb study are described by the following highlights from the executive summary: • Trade area population of 407,361 in 2014, which is expected to increase to 438,533 in 2019, an annual growth rate of 1.49 percent. • Trade area households grew at an annual rate of 1.94 percent between 2000 and 2010. During a slow growth period caused by the great recession, household growth averaged 1.0 percent annually. • Households are expected to increase at an annual growth rate of 1.5 percent from 157,810 in 2014 to 169,997 in 2019. • The trade area includes Carver and Scott counties, the two fastest growing counties in Minnesota. Between 2010 and 2013, population in Carver and Scott counties grew at annual rates of 1.6 and 1.8 percent, respectively. • Trade area average household income of $103,006 in 2014 is 20 percent above the Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA average household income of $85,611 and 41 percent above the United States average of $72,869. • Trade area median household income of $83,841 in 2014 is 55 percent above the national median household income of $53,958. • Trade area average household income is expected to increase to $110,603 in 2019, while median household income is expected to rise to $91,761. In 2014, 60,100 households (38.1 percent) are estimated to have household income above $100,000 and is expected to increase to 71,000 (41.8 percent) in 2019. One- quarter of the households (42,113) are expected to have incomes above $150, 000 in 2019. SCD14001.LEV L A N D IF O R M September 30, 2016 Project Narrative 5 • Families comprise 70 percent of all households in 2014 compared to 64.7 percent in the Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA and 66.6 percent in the United States. • Trade area population age 25 plus is well educated with 30.4 and 13.1 percent that hold college and graduate degrees, respectively. This is well above the United States rates of 20.8 and 12.2 percent, respectively. • Trade area population in 2014 is 89.9 percent Caucasian followed by Asian/Pacific Islander (4.0 percent), African American (2.3 percent), Native American (0.4 percent) and Other (3.4 percent). Hispanic (any race) is 4.3 percent. • The trade area's many economic attributes, population, and upper income households provide support for retail stores, restaurants and services. This market study supports the need for this mixed use development on this property and details the unmet demand in the City. Our project will help the City of Chanhassen capture dollars that are currently leaving the City and provide services and amenities needed to support the existing and new residential development in this area. Our regional center will serve an unmet need in the community and will complement existing Chanhassen businesses. AUAR (Alternative Urban Areawide Review) The City completed the Chanhassen 2005 AUAR in 2003 for 624 acres, including this 114 acre site. MN Environmental Rules require that AUARs be updated every 5 years, but the AUAR has not been updated by the City despite the fact that much of the AUAR area have been developed since 2005. When the City updated the Comprehensive Plan in 2008, the City identified this property as a significant development opportunity within the City due in part to the residential development potential in the western portion of the City and the need to provide regional commercial for Chanhassen residents. While the AUAR was not updated with the Comprehensive Plan, the City did discuss land use changes from the residential land uses shown in the Chanhassen 2005 AUAR to the regional/lifestyle mixed use shown in the Comprehensive Plan. We ask that the City order an update to the 2005 AUAR (dated December 2003) for this area. The AUAR project area includes an area of approximately 624 acres, much of which has already been developed. We understand that the AUAR area encompasses far more area that the regional/lifestyle mixed use area designated in the Comprehensive Plan or the area of our concept plan application, but we have agreed to fund the cost of the City's AUAR update. We believe the AUAR is important for the City to update in compliance with the Minnesota environmental rules and for us to better understand the development issues for our project. SCD140011EV L A N D F O R M September 30, 2016 Project Narrative 6 We request that the City initiate this AUAR update to reflect the land use and infrastructure changes since the original AUAR was developed. We believe this will reflect the City's Comprehensive Plan goals and will support the develop concept we have prepared. We look forward to working with the City to prepare the update and incorporating any findings into our development proposal. We request that the City Council re -order the AUAR as soon as possible. It is our understanding that a different developer approached the City in 2012 to discuss a potential mixed use development on this site and the City contracted with HKGi, at the developers expense, to begin looking at development scenarios for an AUAR update. While the development did not proceed, and the AUAR was not updated, there were several development concepts prepared by HGKi for consideration. We have evaluated these alternatives as part of site analysis. We believe that our concept plan shares many of the same concepts developed by HKGi and responds to current market realities. In 2015, the City Council ordered an update to the AUAR, but it was not started. We now request that the City begin that work to update the 2003 AUAR to reflect the land use and infrastructure changes since the AUAR was developed. We believe that the AUAR will reflect the City's Comprehensive Plan goals and will support the develop concept we have prepared. We look forward to working with the City to prepare the AUAR update and incorporating any findings into our development proposal. SUMMARY We respectfully request review of our concept plan for this regional destination, lifestyle and mixed use center and we request that the City initiate the update of the AUAR. We look forward to the City Council work session on October 19, 2016, Planning Commission review on November 1, 2016 and City Council review on November 14, 2016. CONTACT INFORMATION This document was prepared by: Kendra Lindahl, AICP Landform 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Any additional questions regarding this application can be directed to Kendra Lindahl at klindahl(cDlandform.net or 612.638.0225. SCD140011EV L A N D F O R M September 30, 2016 Project Narrative 7 AVIENDA f- ti'l`t`, AM wow 0 4 Concept Submittal Exhibit Contents: 1. Regional Context 2. Site Analysis 3. Proposed Land Use 4. Development Plan 3.5 5. Concept Plan Options for Center Village cl t • r- ��> - ` `� Lake Ann,Do own Chanhassen �- Chanhassen Arboretum �� t _ 1 94 'IF "j �. •'�`Chanhassen High School R}ce Mar , Project Site' r �r Lake Bavaria r IJV- �- " ' Hazeltine Lake � f, � •F r !{ • , A.. Flying CLOW Airport � ,�.� � , �- � s,• Lake Riley . • � ^s, y,,. Chaska High 0 r• s— 212 Medical Center +`: T Available Land Ali Existing Trail / Sidewalk 1 I �ir' ' R .. x ' r Rice Lake .1 v R J .+ U •�, .. �, ro J.' ��. '� / t e. - ,ice-.� � +. •' �'*F '�.{ ".moi` ,,. - -' � `. iY !! <, , Wei 7' f �r:r' 'y• ` - �'•l. , ; V0 t'o • • • • in collaboration with: LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT F O R M RSP ARCHITECTS • COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL AVIENDA • Chanhassen, MN • • Concept Submittal • 09.30.2016 I f 14Jf'•rr 1 . I �'.._. _ Edges Sensitive to Adjacent Use it r1t Existing Residential -= } A E i..- Access to Lyman Blvd Existing Wetlands Potential Connection iTl ��"A■ � _ \ Neighborhood Access, ;Densely ��, Wooded Knoll� _ ■ Emergency Access ■ if ` signaled Access • • in collaboration with: LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT L A N D F O R M RSP ARCHITECTS - COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL AVIENDA • Chanhassen, MN • • Concept Submittal • 09.30.2016 Land Uses from 2012 HKGi AUAR Concepts (constrained to project site) CONCEPT 1 (Acres) Ww `7 I CONCEPT 2 (Acres) Mna � s 30.3 Regional Commercial 17.4 Office 13.5 High Density Res. 19.8 Medium Density Res. Stormwater Conservation 18.2 Regional Commercial 33.6 Office 5.8., Mixed Use 4.11 High Density Res. 16 7 Medium Density Res. f - Stormwater Conservation AVIENDA - Regional Commercial Office - High Density Res. - Medium Density Res. - Stormwater - Conservation 9.56 Ac 5.33 Ac 2.58 Ac AVIENDA PARKWAY --��. 3.38 Ac 9.01 Ac I 2.58 Ac 15.88 Ac 3.45 Ac 1.33 Ac 9.93 Ac 3.27 Ac IT -TIF -30, 0� Land Uses 2016 1.57 Ac Proposed Concept 2.04 Ac (Acres) 0 =Regional Commercial 1.83 Ac 14.56 Office ` IMEIR *Site plan is for illustrative purposes only and is subject to change. 12.49, High Density Residential 9.56 Medium Density Residential _Alternative BMPs may be implemented in plan 15.84 Conservation 11.04 Right -of -Way 113.79 Total Development (Acres) AVIENDA *Site plan is for "P? illustrative purposes only and is subject to change. i Legend I Future Traffic Signal Existing Traffic Signal Stall Cant Pudic Right Of Way 0 Ponding Preservation Welland and Buffer Regional Commercial Office High Density Residential Medium Density Residential Reaional Man GAr�ea Net Section Developable Building Area Parking lJnIW (Acres) Area (S.F.) Stalls Beds (Aces) 0 9.93 9.55 108,000 573 0 1.33 1.33 7,000 99 0 9.01 8.57 93,000 128 312 0 9.56 6.32 68,000 Na 72 0 5.33 2.97 50,000 197 0 2.58 2.58 30,000 191 0 3.38 3.38 33,000 249 0 3.27 3.27 60,000 259 0 1.86 1.63 6,500 115 0 1.57 1.20 6,500 96 0 2.04 1.64 6,500 119 0 1.83 1.83 7,000 104 0 26.70 26.70 254,500 1364 0 2.45 2.45 25,000 138 150 0 2.58 1.91 25,000 115 100 0 3.45 3.02 40,000 108 92 0 11.04 0.00 Na nla 0 15.88 0.00 Na rda Total AVIENDA *Site plan is for illustrative purposes only and is subject to change. 4A OPTION 2 OPTION 3 OPTION 4 n1 - OPTION 5 Aanenson, Kate From: Thomas, John <ThomasJohn@District112.org> Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 9:36 AM To: Kahring, DeeDee; Brecht, David; Aanenson, Kate Cc: Bauck, James Subject: RE: Agency Review Request - Avienda Residential, Commercial, Hotel & Office Concept Plan Good morning Kate — Dee Dee Kahring forwarded your email communications to me regarding the proposed development at Lyman and Powers Blvd. I've reviewed the proposal, and I have one concern regarding the High Density Residential area. Referring to the Land Uses 2016 Proposed Concept graphic on page 4, it appears that the smaller HDR (3.45ac) will only be accessible using parking lots or a secondary road/driveway. My concern is, as the Transportation Manager of the school district, that we don't want to route our school buses into areas that may not be designed and maintained for larger vehicles. For instance, our aim is to stay on city streets that were built for heavier traffic by heavier vehicles, and will be plowed in a timely manner in the winter. We also do not want to use parking lots where turns may be tight and our buses are mixing with a large amount of personal vehicles. Based on the graphic, my thought is that we would use Bluff Creek Blvd. and have a bus stop established on that road for the 9.01ac building. However, in order to pickup students for the 3.45ac building, we will need to use the secondary road and parking lots, which concerns me. Therefore, I would like to request/recommend consideration to make the secondary access road on the south side of the 9.01ac building more substantial and possibly be considered a city street so that it can be maintained at the same level as Bluff Creek Blvd. I'd like to see it wide enough for large vehicles to pass each other safely, with a sidewalk on one or both sides. I hope this makes sense to you. I'd be happy to discuss this further with you if you're not clear from my description. Thank you forgiving me the opportunity to review this. Sincerely, John Thomas, Transportation Manager Eastern Carver County Schools 952-556-6161 From: Kahring, DeeDee Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 3:11 PM To: Thomas, John <ThomasJohn@District112.org>; Brecht, David <BrechtD@District112.org> Cc: Bauck, Jim <BauckJ@District112.org> Subject: FW: Agency Review Request - Avienda Residential, Commercial, Hotel & Office Concept Plan Development information for Lyman and Powers Blvd. follow instructions below DeeDee Kahring, SFO Director of Finance & Operations s CenterPoint, Energy October 10, 2016 City of Chanhassen Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 700 West Linden Avenue PO Box 1165 Minneapolis, MN 55440-1165 RE: Proposed Request for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District (A2) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) on 118 acres of land located at the SW corner of Powers and Lyman Boulevards. Dear Mrs. Aanenson: Concerning your request, CenterPoint Energy has no objection to the Rezoning. If you have any questions, please contact me at 612-321-5381. Respectfully, CEE%NTERPOINrT ENERGY r� Chuck Mayers Right -of -Way Specialist Engineering Services charles.mayers@centerpointenergy.com 612-321-5381 .....win ta BoardMinneof Water & Soil Resources October 19, 2016 Kate Aanenson City of Chanhassen PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Ms. Aanenson, VIA Email: kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us I have reviewed project number 2016-25, known as the Avienda-Chan Retail Site. I am concerned that the project proposer has not accounted for the nearly 5.5 acres of wetland that exist on the site. These wetlands are regulated by the MN Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) under MN Rule 8420. My understanding is that this site includes a tributary watershed to both Lake Susan, an impaired water and Bluff Creek, an impaired watercourse. Wetlands are recognized as having important functions and values, including: stormwater retention, water quality treatment, wildlife habitat and others. The WCA purpose is to achieve a no net loss in the quantity, quality and biological diversity of Minnesota's wetlands. Although the WCA allows for replacement of these functions and values where avoidance is not feasible, it does not preclude the project from being reviewed for adequacy under the MN Rule 8420.0520 Sequencing. This rule says that a project must first demonstrate wetland avoidance alternatives and minimizes wetland impacts. Although the WCA does not regulate the rezoning of property the current plan as proposed, does not address the requirements as outlined in the state wetland rules. I encourage the applicant to meet early with the reviewing agencies as part of their planning process. Sincerely, Ben Meyer Wetland Specialist MN Board of Water and Soil Resources Cc. Terry Jeffery, City Aaron Finke, Carver SWCD Melissa Jenny, Corps of Engineers Ken Powell, BWSR Becky Horton, DNR Kristen Larson, Carver Co. Bemidji Brainerd Detroit takes Duluth Mankato Marshall New Ulm Rochester St Cloud St. Paul St. Paul Office 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 Phone: (651) 296-3767 www.bwsr.state.mn.us TTY: (800) 627-3529 An equal opportunity employer The City of Chanhassen Citizen Survey ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS Four additional questions were asked by the City of Chanhassen as listed below. The results for these questions are also available in the Report of Results. Question 16a: Policy Question 1 The City completed a retail market study that showed Chanhassen businesses successfully meet day-to-day shopping needs, and a regional mall along with the new Highway 212 in the City of Chanhassen would be viable and expand the retail opportunities in our city. The City Council would like to know the level to which you Neither agree or disagree with the Strongly Somewhat agree nor Somewhat Strongly following statements: agree agree disagree disagree disagree Total 1 would like a regional mall built along the new Highway 212 29% 24% 16% 14% 17% 100% I would like the City to focus retail expansion in the downtown area and not along the new Highway 212 21% 25% 24% 20% 10% 100% I would like to limit retail to the amount currently found in Chanhassen and not build a regional mall 16% 13% 17% 25% 29% 100% Question 16b: Policy Question 2 Medium Large I do not (two (multiple support the Small department department No development (specialty stores and stores and preference of a regional stores specialty specialty in terms of mall in only) stores) stores) scale Chanhassen Total What size mall, if at all, would you like to see developed in Chanhassen? (select only one) 10% 34% 22% 9% 25% 100% Summar. Report L CHAN-212 TRADE AREA DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS AND SALES POTENTIAL Prepared for Carlston Commercial RE, LLC Prepared by McComb Group, Ltd. June 2014 © Copyright 2014 McComb Group, Ltd. Chapter VI SALES POTENTIAL AND SUPPORTABLE GLA The Chan -212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods trade areas have the potential to support more GLA than can be accommodated at the proposed development. This creates the enviable situation where the developer can choose from a wide variety of retail stores to establish its market position. Supportable GLA Estimated Chan -212 supportable GLA by retail store type is contained in Table 27. In almost every category, supportable space exceeds the median store size. These estimates of supportable square feet are likely to be understated due to the high trade area household income. Also, there are likely to be a large proportion of high income and high asset households where there are few constraints on discretionary spending. Table 27 CHAN-212 SHOPPING GOODS SUPPORTABLE GLA By MERCHANDISE CATEGORY (Gross Leasable Mea) 42 Store Sire Merchandise Category 2015 2020 2025 Low Median High CONVENIENCE GOODS Food Stores Grocery Stores 94,087 113,202 135,261 31,676 52,500 65,888 Supermarkets 92,189 110,915 132,528 31,245 52,419 69,462 Convenience Food 2,913 3,507 4,190 1,349 2,085 5,323 Specialty Food Stores 7,650 9,205 11,000 1,188 2,400 6,000 Meat Markets 2,529 3,036 3,631 1,130 2,215 18,080 Baked Goods 524 632 756 1,191 1,834 3,285 Confectionery and Nut Stores 409 494 591 702 1,240 2,047 AO Other Specialty Food Stores 1,095 1915 1,570 1,069 2,200 8,007 Other Convenience Goods Drug & Proprietary Stores 20,480 24,643 29,443 8,280 11,700 23,714 Hardware 7,795 9,384 11,211 5,638 13,831 27,743 Liquor 19,819 23,845 28,491 1,305 2,856 7,210 Florist 2,879 3,463 4,137 766 1,600 5,3% Food/Health Supplernent Stores 1,400 1,684 2,012 1,200 1,234 1,968 Food Service Full -Service Restaurants 72,594 8V19 106,481 2,000 4,500 91775 Looked Service Restaurants 41,438 50,415 60,783 1,335 3,000 3,400 Cafeterias 3,528 4,294 5,170 517 1,073 10,049 Snack & Beverage Places 14,733 17,927 21,613 850 1,500 2,495 Ice Cream & Soft Serve 1,702 2,071 2,492 902 1,148 1,570 Fromn Yogurt 275 340 405 1,031 1792 1,700 Doughnut Shops 3,518 4777 5,159 744 1,200 2,153 Bagel Shops 804 978 1,178 2,000 2,388 3,400 Coffee Shops 4,698 5,713 6,888 881 1300 2,000 Cookie Shops 138 170 203 220 602 797 Other Snack Shops 2,456 2,986 3,600 850 1,578 2,495 Gasoline Sys Stations/Cony Gas/Convenience Food Stores 6,619 8,052 9,708 1,500 2,933 6,121 42 43 Table 27 (continued) CHAIN -212 SHOPPWiG GOODS SUPPORTABLE GLA BY MpiCFIANDLSE CATEGORY (Gross Usable Area) Store Sive Merchandise Category 2015 2020 2025 Low Median High SHOPPING GOODS General Merchandise Department Stores (loci. leased depts.) 216,484 263,376 317,536 57,720 94,788 141,986 Discount Stores 157,156 191,200 230,520 89,641 148,796 243,167 Department Stores Other General Merchandise Stores 270,224 328,758 396,362 90, 134 151,980 217,447 Warehouse Clubs and Supercenters 23,218 28,250 34,055 2'726 13,788 Dollar Stores Miscellaneous General Merchandise 47,148 57,360 69,156 3,2M 8.000 400 11112 Apparel & Accessories Clothing Stores 10,050 12,223 14,732 2,002 4,000 5,635 Mens and Boys 49,115 59,755 72,040 2,074 4,200 8,740 Womens Clothing 18,929 23,029 27,767 1,490 3,912 6,000 Children's & Infant 87,835 106,862 128,835 2,374 8,000 28,228 Famdy Clothing 4,659 5,666 6,831 918 1,400 2.001 Clothing Accessories Stores 13,902 16,909 20,389 1,060 2,300 8,234 Other Clothing Stores Shoe Stores 921 1,117 1,348 903 1,640 2,186 Men's Women's 1,759 2,137 2,574 1,309 2,384 3,158 Children's & Infant 424 514 621 41,166 1,490 2,021 3,912 3,388 6,000 10,234 Family Shoe Stores 28,063 11,931 34,143 14,514 17,491 1,535 3,284 11,314 Athletic Footwear Furniture & Home Furnishings 74,612 90,773 109,442 3,108 7,927 36,712 Furniture 32,742 39,836 48,022 1,229 3,593 7,819 Floor Coverings 3,510 4,267 5,143 1,489 4,905 9,934 Window Treatment Stores 49,114 59,749 72,040 2,868 3,570 6'500 Ali Other Hose Furnishings Stores Electronics & Appliances Stores 26,255 31,938 38,505 2,349 4,OOD 7,563 Household Appliance Stores 99,203 120,693 145,517 1,208 3,406 10,451 Rad in, TV& Electronics Stores 15,241 18,543 22,357 997 3,388 25,600 Computers, Software, Mus ic,& Other Electronics Other Shopping Goods 81,035 98,585 118,860 2,238 7,500 44,116 Sporting Goods General line Sporting Goods 33,155 40,335 48,625 3,765 5,850 28,128 Specialty Line Sporting Goods 42,564 51,787 62,431 1,097 2,449 4,542 4,356 29,974 Book Stores &Newsdealers 28,394 34,544 41,650 2,428 585 1,033 2,247 Stationery Stores and Office Supply 16,043 19,520 23,531 2,432 7,314 26,094 Musical Instrument &Supplies 11,254 13,696 16,513 790 1,450 3,410 Jewelry Stores 28,332 34,471 30,716 41,560 37,051 1,604 4,050 75,861 Hobby, Toy & Carse 25,257 6,695 8,149 9,822 816 2100 5,965 Camera & Photographic Supply 40,827 49,227 2,369 4,422 7,015 Craft, Novelty ea Souvenirs 33,567 3,065 3,735 4,500 1,193 2,300 3,102 Luggage &Leather Goods 23,330 28,390 34,210 2,678 12'202 19,299 Sewing, Needlework & Piece Goods 22,100 26,885 32,420 1,847 32A 12,398 Pet Stores 3,276 3,982 4,800 675 1,434 2,401 Art Dealers 12,703 15,452 18,631 885 1,561 4,068 Optical Goods Stores 3,048 3,709 4,470 1,308 3,426 12,753 Pre -Recorded Tapes, Compact Discs 11,447 13,800 1,102 1,953 6,235 Cosmetics, Beauty Supplies & Perfume 9,409 697 1'786 3'081 All Other Health & Personal Care 18,753 22,811 27,505 43 ]'able 27 (continued) CHAN-212 SHOPPING GOODS SUPPORTABLE GLA BY MERCBANDSECATFiGORY (Gross tenable Area) SERVICES Personal Care Services Beauty Shops Nail Salons Diet & Weight Reducing Services Other Personal Care Services Drycleaning & Laundry Services Drycleanmg & Laundry Services (inept coin -op.) Other Personal Services Child Day Care Services Photographic Studios Veteranarian Services Pet Care Rental and Leasing Fonralwear and Costume Rental Home Health Equipment Rental Recreation Physical Fitness Facilites Health Care Offices of Physicians Offices of Physicians Offices of Dentists Offices of Chiropractors Offices of Optometrists Offices of Mental Health Practitioners Physical & Occupational Therapists Source: McComb Group, Ltd. Shopping Center Size 16,084 9,111 10,879 900 1,400 Store Sia 2,027 Merchandise Category 2015 2020 2025 Low Median High OTHER RETAIL STORES 1,223 1,856 3,130 2,509 1,417 1,691 Building Materials & Carden Supplies 1,488 4,128 4,367 9,880 11,807 1,038 Budding Materials & Supplies Stores 2,731 14,750 16,710 19,960 3,059 5,050 Home Centers 91,060 110,786 133,566 8,981 95,173 135,833 Paint, Class & Wallpaper 9564 11,636 14,031 2,348 3,533 5,028 Iawn & Carden Equipment 4,560 900 1,200 1,500 482 729 Outdoor Power Equipment 25,590 31,140 37,540 N/A N/A N/A Retail Nurseries, Lawn & Carden 72,890 88,680 106,920 N/A 15,000 N/A Wtor Vehicles & Parts Dealers 32,170 69,703 83,863 100,202 969 1,652 Auto Parts & Accessories Stores 25,010 30,425 36,685 2,232 6,500 13,000 Tae Dealers 18,900 22,995 27,715 3,514 6,944 12,014 SERVICES Personal Care Services Beauty Shops Nail Salons Diet & Weight Reducing Services Other Personal Care Services Drycleaning & Laundry Services Drycleanmg & Laundry Services (inept coin -op.) Other Personal Services Child Day Care Services Photographic Studios Veteranarian Services Pet Care Rental and Leasing Fonralwear and Costume Rental Home Health Equipment Rental Recreation Physical Fitness Facilites Health Care Offices of Physicians Offices of Physicians Offices of Dentists Offices of Chiropractors Offices of Optometrists Offices of Mental Health Practitioners Physical & Occupational Therapists Source: McComb Group, Ltd. Shopping Center Size 16,084 9,111 10,879 900 1,400 3,480 2,027 1,145 1,373 773 1200 1,807 1,320 747 893 1,223 1,856 3,130 2,509 1,417 1,691 703 1,488 4,128 4,367 9,880 11,807 1,038 1,608 2,731 14,750 16,710 19,960 3,059 5,050 7,495 2,156 2,440 2,916 990 1,866 2,550 9,849 11,151 13,329 1,346 2,122 2,701 3,387 3,827 4,560 900 1,200 1,500 482 729 871 763 1,046 1,773 1,664 2,516 3,008 1,200 1,600 3,480 67,750 76,725 91,663 1,433 6,448 32,170 69,703 83,863 100,202 969 1,652 4,008 32,197 19,368 23,145 1,090 1,700 3,970 4,649 2,797 3,342 1,090 1,600 3,970 1,764 3,183 3,805 1,074 1,620 4,347 2,391 4,316 5,157 1,090 1,800 3,970 4,006 7,232 8,641 1,090 1,600 3,970 Sales potential and supportable square feet provide an indication of shopping center potential. Shopping center size will depend on tenant interest and the number of anchor stores. The potential GLA by store category ranges from 825,000 square feet to 1,120,000 square feet, as shown in Table 28. Convenience goods ranges from 105,000 square feet to 135,000 square feet depending on supermarket size and number of other retailers. Convenience goods includes stores where M convenience is a primary consideration as they are visited on a regular basis. Examples include supermarkets, drug, liquor, hardware, acid other stores and services. Tale 28 CHAN-212 POTENTIAL GROSS LFASABLEARFA Shopping goods retailers are stores where comparison shopping is a common part of the shopping trip. Department stores typically anchor these shopping centers. Potential anchor store GLA ranges from 120,000 square feet to 220,000 square feet. Junior anchor retailers are various size stores, ranging in size from 10,000 square feet to 50,000 square feet, also adding the center's drawing power. Junior anchor GLA could range from 220,000 square feet to 315,000 square feet. Inline, small store tenants could range from 110,000 square feet to 180,000 square feet. Total shopping goods stores could range from 450,000 square feet to 715,000 square feet. Food service establishments are expected to range from 35,000 square feet to 50,000 square feet. Services of various types could range from 20,000 square feet to 30,000 square feet. Destination retailers like health clubs, home centers, and cinemas, could total 215,000 square feet to 235,000 square feet if all three located at Chan -212. It is possible that not all the anticipated potential tenants will located at Chan -212 indicating that the shopping center is likely to be between 800,000 square feet and 1,000,000 square feet. 45 Gross leasable Area Store Category Low High Convenience Goods 105,000 135,000 Shopping Goods Anchor Stores 120,000 220,000 Junior Anchors 220,000 315,000 Inline Stores 110,000 180,000 Subtotal 450,000 715,000 Food Ser-jce Restaurants 20,000 30,000 Fast Food 15,000 20,000 Subtotal 35,000 50,000 Services 20,000 30,000 Destination Stores Health Club 50,000 60,000 Home Center 115,000 115,000 Cinema 50,000 60,000 Subtotal 215,000 235,000 Total 825,000 1,165,000 source: McComb Group, Ltd Shopping goods retailers are stores where comparison shopping is a common part of the shopping trip. Department stores typically anchor these shopping centers. Potential anchor store GLA ranges from 120,000 square feet to 220,000 square feet. Junior anchor retailers are various size stores, ranging in size from 10,000 square feet to 50,000 square feet, also adding the center's drawing power. Junior anchor GLA could range from 220,000 square feet to 315,000 square feet. Inline, small store tenants could range from 110,000 square feet to 180,000 square feet. Total shopping goods stores could range from 450,000 square feet to 715,000 square feet. Food service establishments are expected to range from 35,000 square feet to 50,000 square feet. Services of various types could range from 20,000 square feet to 30,000 square feet. Destination retailers like health clubs, home centers, and cinemas, could total 215,000 square feet to 235,000 square feet if all three located at Chan -212. It is possible that not all the anticipated potential tenants will located at Chan -212 indicating that the shopping center is likely to be between 800,000 square feet and 1,000,000 square feet. 45 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on October 20, 2016, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Concept Planned Use Development for a regional destination, lifestyle and mixed use center (Avienda) on five parcels totaling 118 acres on property zoned Agricultural Estate District (A-2) with a land use designation of Regional Commercial or Office use, and located at the southwest corner of Lyman and Powers Boulevards, Planning Case 2016-25 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this JD day of fKj D% 12016. otary Public JENNIFER ANN POTTER Notary PUbI'c-Minnesota �y �mmifebn Elk„ bn 31, Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, November 11, at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Concept Planned Use Development for a regional destination, lifestyle and mixed use center (Avienda) on five Proposal: parcels totaling 118 acres on property zoned Agricultural Estate District (A-2) with a land use designation of Regional Commercial or Office use. Applicant: Landform Professional Services LLC. Applicant: Owner: Level 7 Development. Property Southwest corner of Lyman and Powers Boulevards. Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens W Wthe 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-25. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Kate Aanenson by Questions & email at kaanenson cDci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952-227-1139. If you choose to submit written comments, it is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWI Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Ren Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feel of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested perry is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports ere available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Coundl may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercialAndusmal. • Minnesota Stale Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 clays unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersonlrepresentative Is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any Interested personnel. • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. 0 you wish to he" something to be included In the report, lease contact the Mannino Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, November 11, at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening. depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Concept Planned Use Development for a regional destination, lifestyle and mixed use center (Avienda) on five Proposal: parcels totaling 118 acres on property zoned Agricultural Estate District (A-2) with a land use designation of Regional Commercial or Office use. Applicant: Landform Professional Services LLC. Applicant. Owner: Level 7 Development. Property Southwest corner of Lyman and Powers Boulevards. Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens W Wthe 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-25. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Kate Aanenson by Questions & email at kaanenson(cDci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952-227-1139. If you choose to submit written comments, it is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWI Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Ran Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City oMlnances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any Interested party is Invited to attend the meeting. • Stan prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent information and a recommendation, These reports are available by request, At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the Item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommentlation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercialfndustdal. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant walves this standard. Some applications clue to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhcod regarding their proposal. Staff Is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. kenutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the Gly Council. 0 you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease conlact the Planning Stall person named on the notification. Taxpayer Name Taxpayer Address Taxpayer City -State -Zip AARON LEIGH SANDNESS 9171 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4758 ADAM J CARVER 1447 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 ALEKSANDR S SIMANOVICH 1482 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4811 ANDREW KIM 9070 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 ANDREW LASKA 9291 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4745 ANNIE T DANIELSON 9130 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4780 ANTHONY S LARSON 9180 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 553_17-4780 ARAVIND PUTTA 1505 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4812 ASHLEY N NELSON REV INTERVIVOS TRUST 1485 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4811 ASIM MOHAMMED SYED 1561 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9403 B ELMER FAMILY FARMS LLC 19450281STST BELLE PLAINE, MN 56011-5010 BHANU P THOTA 1495 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4811 BHASKAR GURRAMKONDA 1471 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55_317-4750 BRADLEY SKEEL 1452 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4811 BRADLEY WESTVIG 1430JERSEY WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8622 BRANDON B MEHDIZADEH 1511 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4808 BRANDON E BUSSLER 1451 HENRY CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2200 BRANDON ZENK 9091 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4845 BRENT R & KATHLEEN A MILLER 1200 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9168 BRIAN DUNN 1421 HENRY CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2200 BRIAN HELTEMES 1502 CAMDEN RIDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2303 BRUCE V MUNDAHL 9445 RIVER ROCK DR S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 BRYAN T PETERSEN 9180 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4758 CAMDEN RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN 1801 AMERICAN BLVD E STE 21 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425-123_0 CAROLYN HARBERT 9492 RIVER ROCK DR S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 CARVER COUNTY 602 4TH ST E CHASKA, MN 55318-2102 --- CHAD & JAN GNIFFKE 1419 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 CHAD ENGEL 9050 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 CHAD LINDELL 9330 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4746 CHRISTIAN L SCHENK 1300 OAKSIDE CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9005 CHRISTOPHER PRICCO 9441 RIVER ROCK DR S CHANHASSEN, MN 5531_7 - CHRISTOPHER R ANDERSON 1423 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 CLINT ALLEN BITTING 1531 CAMDEN RIDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2303 COREY MASLOWSKI CRAIG 1 PETERSON CRAIG P PABICH CURTIS L CLEMENTS DALLAS JOHN FRASER DAMIAN L NOLD DANIEL A O'CONNELL DANIEL GOLD MAN DANIEL DEYOUNG DAVID K LAWSON DAVID L VEGA DAVID T & JENNIFER R PERRY DEGLER LAND COMPANY LLC DEREK M & JENNIFER L PAULING DONALD E VASATKA III DOUGLAS D SUMNER DUNN FAMILY TRUST EBENEZER & SUSANNA PETERS ELIZABETH WILLIAMS ERIC HOUS_ELOG ERIC L & JENNIFER L SWANSON ERIK DALE ERIK JOHNSON EVAN M LUCORE GEORGE MURRAY GUNJAN SHARMA HAROLD STANDLEY HUONG N DANG IAN GLENN I-FEI TSU ILHAM LLC IVAN ATANASOV JACOB A WILLS JAMES C EBELING 1460 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-6749 13400AKSIDE CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9005 9161 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4758 1480 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 9170 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4780 9100 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4780 9071 DELGER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 1511 CAMDEN RIDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2303 9220 ELLENDALE LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4747 9060 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 1480 PEMBROKE PASS CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4756 _ 9250 ELLENDALE LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4747 541 PINEVIEW CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-869.7 9260 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- _ 9120 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4780 _ 9140 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4780 1411 HENRY CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2200 _ 9280 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4745 9421 RIVER ROCK DR S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1501 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4750 1440 BETHES 1190 LYMAN 9081 DEGLER 1440JERSEY 11430 BETHES 1470JERSEY 1630 JEURISS 9151 RIVER R 1532 MILLS 9210 ELLEND 9301 RIVER R 9102 RIVER R 9021 DEGLER 9160 DEGLE R DA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55 BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55 CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55 WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55 DA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55 WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55 EN LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55 OCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55 DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55 ALE LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55 OCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55 OCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55 CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55 CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55 317-4749 317-9166 317-4836_ 317-8622 317-4749 317-8622 317-4842 317-4758 317-4812 317-4747_ 317-4746 317-4758 317-4836 317- 1440 BETHES 1190 LYMAN 9081 DEGLER 1440JERSEY 11430 BETHES 1470JERSEY 1630 JEURISS 9151 RIVER R 1532 MILLS 9210 ELLEND 9301 RIVER R 9102 RIVER R 9021 DEGLER 9160 DEGLE R DA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55 BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55 CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55 WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55 DA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55 WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55 EN LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55 OCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55 DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55 ALE LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55 OCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55 OCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55 CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55 CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55 317-4749 317-9166 317-4836_ 317-8622 317-4749 317-8622 317-4842 317-4758 317-4812 317-4747_ 317-4746 317-4758 317-4836 317- 317-4749 317-9166 317-4836_ 317-8622 317-4749 317-8622 317-4842 317-4758 317-4812 317-4747_ 317-4746 317-4758 317-4836 317- JAMES MALONE 9452 RIVER ROCK DR S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 JAMES S ROHWER 9111 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4758 JARED A & SUSAN E ANDERSSON 9260 ELLENDALE LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- - - JASON P CUSICK -- -- - 9439 RIVER ROCK DR S --- CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 JEFFREY BAHR 1490 PEMBROKE PASS CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4756 JEFFREY BUCKLEY 1522 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4812 JEFFREY S & KATHERINE B JACOBS 9429 RIVER ROCK DR S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 JEFFREY S & LEE ANN FRANZ 8950 SUNSET TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9100 JERALD D STIELE 1492 CAMDEN RIDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 - JESSICA E GALVIN 1451 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 JOAN M MCNANEY 1455 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4811 JOHN C PETERSON _ 1459 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 JOHN CHARLES COOPER 9500 RIVER ROCK DR S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2_305 JOHN D WINTERS 1490 JERSEY WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8622 JOHN P BYLSMA 9110 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4780 JOHN R SAUER 9090 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 JON 1 VARNER 9300 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4746 JON R RATHBUN 1500 PEMBROKE PASS CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4748 JONATHAN M GILBERT 1641 JEURISSEN LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4842 JONATHAN R & SHANNON G ABAD 1439 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 JOSEPH A BRANDT 1515 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4812 JOSEPH ALTHAUS 1610 JEURISSEN LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4842 JOSEPH ARMSTRONG 1427 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 JOSHUA P CARLSON 9091 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN_, MN 55317-4836 JUSTIN KYLE HANSEN 9417 RIVER ROCK DR S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 KAMINI RAMARAJ 1491 PEMBROKE PASS CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4756 KARIN RENAE O'HARA 1431 HENRY CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2200 KATHERINE PEYTON 1501 CAMDEN RIDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2303 KATHERINE RUCKER 9488 RIVER ROCK DR S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 (CHANHASSEN, KEITH M & KAREN S WHITACRE 1431 BETHESDA CIR MN 55317-4749 KELLY HANSON 1441 HENRY CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2200 KELLY WANG 9270 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4745 KENT B & LORI BETH WARNBERG 1111 LYMAN CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8535 KEVIN E VETSCH & DANA M VETSCH REV TRUST 9310 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4746 KEVIN K O'NEILL 1470 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 KIRK WALTON 1491 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4750 KLAYAN MAVULETI 1460JERSEY WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8622 KRAIG R STABENOW 1465 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 - KURT D EGERTSON 9444 RIVER ROCK DR S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 LCR HOLDINGS LLC 14191 113TH ST LITTLE FALLS, MN 56345-6352 LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT LLC 4600 KINGS POINT RD MINNETRISTA, MN 55331-9628 LEVENT COLAK 147_5 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4811 LOREN J & SANDRA M_DENNIN 1521 PEMBROKE PASS CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- MANDEEP S VIRK 9190 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4758 MARC GILLITZER 1461 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4750 MARCO RASGATTINO 9141 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4758 MAREN F GRIER 9150 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4780 MARK E & MOLLY K WILSON 1443 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 MARK HERZOG 9271 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4745 MARK RAICHE 9448 RIVER ROCK DR S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 MARK T KLUNDER 9240 ELLENDALE LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 - MATTHEW WANGERIN 9080 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 MAX JAHRAUS 9311 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4746 MICHAEL D TIMM 1101 LYMAN CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8535 MINH CAM TRAN 1330 LYMAN, BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9168 NATHAN C & TERESA M PETERSON 1520 PEMBROKE PASS CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4748 NATHANSTIER 9200 ELLENDALE LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4747 NICK HEINZE 1491 CAMDEN RIDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2302 NILESH C SUTHAR 9031 DEGLER CIR (CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 ONESIMO ALEM_AN 1480 JERSEY WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8622 PATRICK T MACY 1472 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4811 PETER G JO_NSWOLD 9101 DEGLER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4780 PRAMOD PUTTA 1502 MILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4812 PRESERVE @ BLF CRK HOMEOWNERS 4672 SLATER RD EAGAN, MN 55122-2362 RACHELLE ROSEMARIE PAIGE BERGQUIST 1461 HENRY CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2200 RENATA BEAMAN REV INTERVIVOS TRUST 9320 RIVER ROCK DR N CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4746 ROLF LEE DIXON 1620 JEURISSEN LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4842 RONALD W & CAROL M ENTINGER 8851 AUDUBON RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9407 S MARTIN K COOPER 11 DRA SCHMITT BAKER & STUART B BAKER RE TOSH KUMAR RAJURI TT BERRY 1 FLAHERTY MN ADAMS (JOSEPH PHEN 1 & LYN A MACHACEK VEN C WIGNESS VEN J HEIMERMANN )EEP & ARCHANA POMAR ;ARJAGARKAL SUM AN KTHAPA TERI MALECHA THE PRESERVE AT BLUFF CREEK HOMEOWNERSA THE PRESERVE AT BLUFF CREEK HOMEOWNERS A THORIR THORISSON TIMOTHY C BOYCE TIRTHA RAJ KHAREL TRACY & SANDY REMINGTON TUOI VAN TRAN U S HOME CORP (DBA/LENNAR) VARUNPARVATANENI VENKATA LOGISETTI WENDY M GALL WILLIAM FUESZ WILLIAM J & VICKY L GOERS_ WILLIAM W CRAWFORD ZHEXIN ZHANG SARA K MAVES REV INTERVIVOS TRUST JEFF RINGBLOM MIKE FLESCH 9281 RIVER ROCK DR N 1492 MILLS DR 8955 SUNSET TRL 90.611 DEGLER CIR 1511 PEMBROKE PASS 1512 MILLS DR 9290 RIVER ROCK DR N 9230 ELLEN )ALE LN 1510 PEMBROKE PASS 1651 JEURISSEN LN 1501 PEMBROKE PASS 1481 DEGLER CIR 9101 RIVER ROCK DR N 1462 MILLS DR 9041 DEGLER CIR 971 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY ST 7300 METRO BLVD STE 300 3.435 BEIHESUAUK _ 6941 AUDUBON RD _ 9425 RIVER ROCK DR S 1531 PEMBROKE PASS 8900 SUNSET TRL 16305 36TH AVE N STE 600 9131 RIVER ROCK DR N 9051 DEGLER CIR 1445 MILLS DR 1450 BETHESDA CIR 1601 LYMAN BLVD 9451 RIVER ROCK DR S 1455 BETHESDA CIR 1455 HEMLOCK WAY 1788 MARIGOLD CT 1694 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4745 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4811 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9126 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4748 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4812 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4745 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4747 CHANHASSEN, MN 553_17-4748 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4842 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4748 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4750 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4758 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4811 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 SAINT PAUL, MN 55118-2856 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55439- CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8412 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4748 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9100 PLYMOUTH, MN 55446-4270 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4758 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4836 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4811 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9402 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2304 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4749 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4544 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4550 rHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4516 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, November 1, at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Concept Planned Use Development for a regional destination, lifestyle and mixed use center (Avienda) on five Proposal: parcels totaling 118 acres on property zoned Agricultural Estate District (A-2) with a land use designation of Regional Commercial or Office use. Applicant: Landform Professional Services LLC. Applicant: Owner: Level 7 Development. Property Southwest comer of Lyman and Powers Boulevards. Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens W Wthe 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.cl.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-25. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Kate Aanenson by Questions & email at kaanenson(Mci chanhassen.rl or by phone at 952-227-1139. If you choose to submit written comments, it is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. MEWI Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign u I Gly Ravi" Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, wetland Alterations, Re clonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and C09 Amendments require a public hearing before Me Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within Sod feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation These reports are available by request At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will dose the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to Me City Counal. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Razonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Counal ezcapt rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercialbndustnal. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may lake several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersonlrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. H ydu wish to have something to be included in the report, base contact the Planning Stell person named on the notification. 41Nt4EASI(DLI mr4l 5-94 20 PM CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 www.b.chanhassen.w.us ITN sTt'; cc!+iD Thisap s Disclaimer neither a legally recorde 't t- U g o 7CR 51'' 1 g 6141-6370 as one. This map is a compilation of n O T L p A D E R county, state and federal offices andiSE AT' TO 15 i `N, be used for reference purposes only. Information System (GIs) Data used to 1`rti1lti�\t11'n�� PtfS PQST'M i :5 PITNEY BOWES 021 P $ 000.465 0003195036 OCT 202016 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 55317 not represent that the GIs Data can { MARK T KLUNDER purpose requiring exacting measurem. _. ,,.e rsion in the depiction of geographic features. Iferor -.are found please contact 952- 9240 ELLENDALE LN 227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is pluwded pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all Uaims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all Uaims brought by User, its employees or agents, t t t t t t r t t t r I l r l I or third parties which arse out of the users access oflfa�,p;; fr ir�l)'I ttltt It tt Itl��trl r tt itI ��i'tr�'t �'�tlt CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 2016-25 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, November 1, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Concept Planned Use Development for a regional destination, lifestyle and mixed use center (Avienda) on five parcels totaling 118 acres on property zoned Agricultural Estate District (A-2) with a land use designation of Regional Commercial or Office use, and located at the southwest corner of Lyman and Powers Boulevards. The concept plan includes residential, commercial, hotel, and office uses. Applicant: Landform Professional Services. LLC. Owner. Level Development A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the City's web site at wwwci.chanhassen. mn.us/2016-25 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Kate Aanenson Email: kaanenson@ ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1139 (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, October 20.2016: No. 4859) Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. 3-5-1V was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghijklmnopgrstu Laurie A. Hartrnanp Subscribed and sworn before me on this day of U ritN� , 2016 JW,,V,E JEMNE7E BAMK _ NO'AR!PURX-M'NNESCTA W C01lMSSCh MRES 011411'.8 N P blit RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space .... $31.20 per column inch Maximum tate allowed by law for the above matte ................................. $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matte ............................................... $12.59 per column inch NEATON & PUKLICH, P.L.L.P. PATRICK). NEATON MICHAEL L. PUKLICH December 22, 2016 Todd Gerhardt City Manager 7700 Market Blvd. P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Data Practices Act Request Dear Mr. Gerhardt: LEGAL ASSISTANTS: LORI B. NOLAN COURTNEY M. OLSON LIZ A. NEATON Pursuant to the Minnesota Data Practices Act, I am hereby requesting that I be given the Opportunity to review the following documents in the custody or control of the City of Chanhassen: 1. Any and all plans submitted to the City of Chanhassen in connection with a mixed-use development proposed for an approximate 120 acre site of real estate at the corner of Powers and Lyman Boulevards in the City of Chanhassen, submitted by Level 7 Development, or any other developer, at any time from and since January 1, 2013. I would like to be able to review those documents at the City's offices as soon as possible. If You have any questions or anything stated in the above -itemized request is not clear, please advise. Thank you for your anticipated attention to this matter. Yours very truly, PJN:ln cc: Jeff Fox 7975 STONE CREEK DRIVE, SUITE 120 1 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 1 PHONE 952.258.8444 1 FAX 952.258.9988 Potter, Jenny From: Potter, Jenny Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 9:38 AM To: 'pat@neatonpuklich.com' Cc: Petersen, Chelsea; Gerhardt, Todd; Aanenson, Kate Subject: Avienda Project Link - Corner of Powers & Lyman Mr. Neaton, In regards to your request for all plans submitted to the City of Chanhassen for the mixed use development at the corner of Powers & Lyman Boulevards; All of the documents relating to this project are titled the Avienda project #2016-25 and are located on the City of Chanhassen website. If you click HERE you will be directed to the Avienda project website. On that page go to Related Resources and click on the Project Documents to view all the plans and files of that project. In the file, there is also a link to the previous project documents, that was titled "2015-05 Lifestyle Center". Please let me know if you have any questions or need any further assistance in viewing the documents. Thank you, Jenny Potter Senior Administrative Support Specialist CITY OF CHANHASSEN PH. 952.227.1106 FX. 952.227.1110 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Finance A-1 Phone: 952.227.1140 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Ci1BllllffJSEN FROM: Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director 7700 PO Boxarket B147levard DATE: October 24, 2016 Chanhassen, MN 55317 In order for the project to proceed, the environmental documents need to be updated p � p teed, p SUBJ: Avienda Administration proposed development. PFax:952.22271100 BACKGROUND Fax: 952.2271110 ANALYSIS Building Inspections The applicant, Level 7 Development, LLC, would like to introduce their proposed Phone: 952.227.1180 mixed-use plan for the City Council to review. The project area for this application Fax: 952.227.1190 has increased to 120 acres from 70 acres in the previous application. The concept Phone: 952.227.1130 PUD application is in process. A neighborhood meeting has been scheduled for Engineering October 19, a public hearing will be held with the Planning Commission on Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 November 1, and the City Council will review the item on November 28. Finance The review process is to consider approval of a concept PUD. While concept Phone: 952.227.1140 approval is not legally binding, the goal is to give direction to the applicant on staffs Fax: 952.227.1110 and city council's expectations for the submittal for preliminary approval. At the November City Council meeting, staff will have prepared for the city council's Park consideration the authorization of an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR). :Recreation Phone: 952.27,11120 Fax: 952.2271110 In order for the project to proceed, the environmental documents need to be updated p � p teed, p and a traffic study needs to be completed to assist with the overall review of the Recreation Center proposed development. 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 ANALYSIS Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & While this is an introductory meeting, staff would like the council to be aware of Natural Resources some of the major elements of the proposed development plan: Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 1. Number of wetland alterations 2. Surface Water Management Public Works 3. Grading and the impact of required connections 7901 Park Place 4. Lack of a gathering place\connections Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 5. Considerations of critical issues from the April 20, 2015 Visioning Process Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Website www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Todd Gerhardt October 24, 2016 Page 2 of 3 Figure 2 - Existing Conditions (2013 Carve Photograph) N0 500 The District at Vincent Ridge (KES 2015-0131 AFeet Chanhassen, Minnesota i �r,a /1 KjoLHAuG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY Swm: MIC.. ESRI Imagery BapnesP ATTACHMENTS 1. Application for Concept Plan Review. 2. Concept Submittal Exhibit. 3. Summary of Planning Session dated April 20, 2016. g:\plan\2016 planning cases\2016-25 avienda - than retail siteUntao mtg at cc 10-24-16.dmx Nae: Boundaries Indicated m this rqure are approximate and do no Cmstitute an nfl1CW1 SlaVey praduct. Level 7 Development, LLC AVIENDA Chanhassen, MN APPLICATION FOR CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW September 30, 2016 L A N D From Site to Finish F O R M • • INTRODUCTION On behalf of Level 7 Development, Landform is pleased to submit this application for concept plan review for "Avienda", a mixed use Regional/Lifestyle Center at the southwest corner of intersection of Powers Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard. The property is dual guided Office or Regional Commercial and zoned Agriculture Estate west of Powers Boulevard and is guided Medium Density Residential and zoned Agriculture Estate for the 1.66 acres east of Powers Boulevard. The Comprehensive Plan anticipates development of this site as "Regional/Lifestyle Center Commercial". The plan notes that the vision for the site is: 'A mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market. The physical environment emphasizes an attractive, comfortable walking experience for shoppers and visitors and is designed to serve trail users and mass transit as well as automobile traffic. Centers of this type have at least two major retail anchors and are characterized by the diversity and mix of retail and service uses within their boundaries. Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in the other commercial districts. Development of these centers shall be planned as a group of organized uses and structures to accommodate a sensitive transition between commercial activities such as loading, parking of automobiles, lighting and trash collection and surrounding residential uses. Such centers shall be designed with one theme, with similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials and a coordinated landscaping theme. Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system. Goods and Services Examples • Entertainment • Department Store • Comparison Shopping • Specialty Retail/Boutique • Restaurants • Hotels • Residential A new zoning district Regional Commercial (RC) will be created in the City Code to implement this land use. The city has given a dual land use of the 118 acres at the southeast comer of Powers and Lyman Boulevards to accommodate this use." SCD140011EV L A N D F O R M September 30. 2016 Project Narrative 2 CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW In 2015, the City reviewed a similar concept plan from Carlston Development for a portion of this site. The City provided feedback on the concept plan and ordered an AUAR update. Before the AUAR could begin, Level 7 Development acquired the property and decided to pause and take a fresh look at the site. The new development team completed the site analysis and reviewed the feedback that was received during that process. The design team has also reviewed a number of City documents before beginning development of our concept, including: • Chanhassen 2005 AUAR (dated December 8, 2003) prepared for the City by HKGi • The "Chanhassen Retail, Office and Residential Market Analysis and Development Potential" report (dated June 2006) prepared for the City by McComb Group, Ltd. • The 2007 City Survey • The 2010 City Survey • The 2013 City Survey • The Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance • The Chanhassen Subdivision Ordinance • The 2030 Comprehensive Plan (adopted November 10, 2008) • The comments provided during the 2015 review of the Carlston Development proposal Level 7 Development has been working to refine the plans for a mixed-use development concept that is market -ready and consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. We are excited to provide a concept with a mix of potential uses that may include townhomes, apartments, office, medical and professional services, retail, entertainment and hospitality. The proposed mixed-use development will help the City achieve its goals of providing a variety of housing types for all people in all stages of the life cycle, providing a mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market, preserving natural resources through the protection of the Bluff Overlay district, and providing regional shopping options for existing residents and new residents as anticipated by the Comprehensive Plan. This plan incorporates a mix of office, retail and residential space in an underserved area of the City. The project will be designed with one theme, with a similar high-end architectural style, similar exterior building materials and a coordinated landscaping theme as directed by the Comprehensive Plan. While we have not yet defined all of these details, our submittal package includes a schematic concept plan to give some idea of the concepts we are currently evaluating. SCD1400I.LEV L A N D F O R M September 30. 2016 Project Narrative 3 Design Concept The provided concept plan meets your Comprehensive Plan goals and includes approximately: 50 acres of Regional Commercial (approximately 435,000 square feet) 15 acres of Office (approximately 40,000 square feet) 12 acres of higher density housing including with a potential for Market Rate Apartments (300 units) and Senior Living (100 units) 6 acres of Hospitality/Hotel uses (250 rooms) 4 acres of Stormwater ponding 16 acres of Conservation land 1.6 acres of land at the southeast comer of Powers and Lyman Boulevard that is not proposed for development, but could be used in conjunction with the adjacent city land for regional or local stormwater/wetland improvements. The design vision for the Avienda development will be an integration of both traditional and contemporary elements that will ultimately establish a "timeless" character. Both visually and physically, architecture will play a major role in the overall design character for the development. High-quality materials including authentic stone, brick and masonry, architectural metal panels, and glass will be key elements that will establish this character. The pedestrian experience will establish the overall scale of the buildings and spaces, with interesting facades and carefully designed architectural elements, lighting, awnings and other unique features. Ample landscaping will be incorporated to create an inviting environment. We have worked to preserve the trees in the buffer area in the southwest portion of the site to provide a buffer between the proposed development and the existing homes on the south and west. We have also designed a plan that locates the medium and high density housing in these areas to provide a transition between the existing homes and the planned commercial uses. A comprehensive landscape plan will be developed to supplement the existing trees and support the design theme throughout the development. We expect different land uses in the development to have different landscape and architecture details, but many of the core design concepts will be threaded throughout the development. The landscaping plans will likely also include private amenities and street furniture that helps activate the streetscape and enhances the pedestrian experience by providing places to relax, rest, or meet friends. The streetscapes will be designed to reflect the different street characteristics within the development from local residential streets to collector streets intended to move traffic through the project. The concept plan shows construction of Bluff Creek Boulevard, a key east -west road connection between the existing neighborhood and Highway 212. Internal connections are provided within the development, SCD14001 LEV F O R M September 30, 2016 Project Narrative 4 including a connection to Lyman Boulevard on the north. Access points on Lyman Boulevard have been designed based on County plans. The road alignments may be modified slightly as we continue to develop the design and determine specific user requirements for this regional destination center. Market Study The concept plan was developed based on a 2014 market study prepared by McComb Group, Ltd, a consultant that the City has used in the past. The study reinforced the need for this development and the findings to support the Regional/Lifestyle Center anticipated by the City's Comprehensive Plan. The 2014 study showed that this area could support 825,000 square feet to 1,120,000 square feet of new retail/commercial. Key takeaways from the June 2014 McComb study are described by the following highlights from the executive summary: • Trade area population of 407,361 in 2014, which is expected to increase to 438,533 in 2019, an annual growth rate of 1.49 percent. • Trade area households grew at an annual rate of 1.94 percent between 2000 and 2010. During a slow growth period caused by the great recession. household growth averaged 1.0 percent annually. • Households are expected to increase at an annual growth rate of 1.5 percent from 157,810 in 2014 to 169.997 in 2019. The trade area includes Carver and Scott counties, the two fastest growing counties in Minnesota. Between 2010 and 2013, population in Carver and Scott counties grew at annual rates of 1.6 and 1.8 percent, respectively. Trade area average household income of $103,006 in 2014 is 20 percent above the Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA average household income of $85,611 and 41 percent above the United States average of $72,869. • Trade area median household income of $83,841 in 2014 is 55 percent above the national median household income of $53,958. • Trade area average household income is expected to increase to $110.603 in 2019, while median household income is expected to rise to $91.761. • In 2014, 60,100 households (38.1 percent) are estimated to have household income above $100,000 and is expected to increase to 71,000 (41.8 percent) in 2019. One- quarter of the households (42,113) are expected to have incomes above $150,000 in 2019. SCD140011EV L A N D F O R M September 30, 2016 Project Narrative 5 • Families comprise 70 percent of all households in 2014 compared to 64.7 percent in the Minneapolis -St. Paul MSA and 66.6 percent in the United States. • Trade area population age 25 plus is well educated with 30.4 and 13.1 percent that hold college and graduate degrees, respectively. This is well above the United States rates of 20.8 and 12.2 percent, respectively. Trade area population in 2014 is 89.9 percent Caucasian followed by Asian/Pacific Islander (4.0 percent), African American (2.3 percent). Native American (0.4 percent) and Other (3.4 percent). Hispanic (any race) is 4.3 percent. • The trade area's many economic attributes, population, and upper income households provide support for retail stores, restaurants and services. This market study supports the need for this mixed use development on this property and details the unmet demand in the City. Our project will help the City of Chanhassen capture dollars that are currently leaving the City and provide services and amenities needed to support the existing and new residential development in this area. Our regional center will serve an unmet need in the community and will complement existing Chanhassen businesses. AUAR (Alternative Urban Areawide Review) The City completed the Chanhassen 2005 AUAR in 2003 for 624 acres, including this 114 acre site. MN Environmental Rules require that AUARs be updated every 5 years, but the AUAR has not been updated by the City despite the fact that much of the AUAR area have been developed since 2005. When the City updated the Comprehensive Plan in 2008, the City identified this property as a significant development opportunity within the City due in part to the residential development potential in the western portion of the City and the need to provide regional commercial for Chanhassen residents. While the AUAR was not updated with the Comprehensive Plan, the City did discuss land use changes from the residential land uses shown in the Chanhassen 2005 AUAR to the region all lifestyle mixed use shown in the Comprehensive Plan. We ask that the City order an update to the 2005 AUAR (dated December 2003) for this area. The AUAR project area includes an area of approximately 624 acres, much of which has already been developed. We understand that the AUAR area encompasses far more area that the regional/lifestyle mixed use area designated in the Comprehensive Plan or the area of our concept plan application, but we have agreed to fund the cost of the City's AUAR update. We believe the AUAR is important for the City to update in compliance with the Minnesota environmental rules and for us to better understand the development issues for our project. SCD140011EV L A N D F O R M September 30. 2016 Project Narrative 6 We request that the City initiate this AUAR update to reflect the land use and infrastructure changes since the original AUAR was developed. We believe this will reflect the City's Comprehensive Plan goals and will support the develop concept we have prepared. We look forward to working with the City to prepare the update and incorporating any findings into our development proposal. We request that the City Council re -order the AUAR as soon as possible. It is our understanding that a different developer approached the City in 2012 to discuss a potential mixed use development on this site and the City contracted with HKGi, at the developer's expense, to begin looking at development scenarios for an AUAR update. While the development did not proceed, and the AUAR was not updated, there were several development concepts prepared by HGKi for consideration. We have evaluated these alternatives as part of site analysis. We believe that our concept plan shares many of the same concepts developed by HKGi and responds to current market realities. In 2015, the City Council ordered an update to the AUAR, but it was not started. We now request that the City begin that work to update the 2003 AUAR to reflect the land use and infrastructure changes since the AUAR was developed. We believe that the AUAR will reflect the City's Comprehensive Plan goals and will support the develop concept we have prepared. We look forward to working with the City to prepare the AUAR update and incorporating any findings into our development proposal. SUMMARY We respectfully request review of our concept plan for this regional destination, lifestyle and mixed use center and we request that the City initiate the update of the AUAR. We look forward to the City Council work session on October 19, 2016, Planning Commission review on November 1, 2016 and City Council review on November 14. 2016. CONTACT INFORMATION This document was prepared by: Kendra Lindahl, AICP Landform 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Any additional questions regarding this application can be directed to Kendra Lindahl at klindahlCo landform.net or 612.638.0225. SCD14001. LEV L A N D F O R M September 30, 2016 Project Narrative 7 Sam �■ AVIENDA r �V r it • v' _ _ AV "k VIENDA 0 in collaboration with LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT AVIENDA • Chanhassen, MN L A N D F O R M RSP ARCHITECTS • COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL • • .,2 �S 2g16 AVIENDA r � •r a t Edges Sensitive to Adjacent Use Access to Lyman Blvd `Existing Wetlandsio ' C Potential Connection '// iiF Signaled Access Existing Residential Neighborhood Access •r y` �. -- 1L Now At • 4V# , 2 - Densely Densely Wooded KnollON — i: ■ _ Emergency Access t ■ L< y Or Y■'l ��Fv:Y.a 'it \�\�.��.. �. 1. 0 in collaboration with. LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT L A N D F O R M RSP ARCHITECTS • COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL AVIENDA • Chanhassen, MN Ccn�,P, Sb- -.a' __ Land Uses from 2012 HKGi AUAR Concepts (constrained to project site) CONCEPT 1 CONCEPT 2 (Acres) rk Regional Commercial Office High Density Res. - Medium Density Res. Stormwater Conservation Regional Commercial 0 I = Mixed Use AVIENDA High Density Res. Medium Density Res. Stormwater - Conservation - Regional Commercial Office High Density Res. Medium Density Res. Stormwater Conservation 0� *Site plan is for illustrative purposes only and is subject to change. Land Uses 2016 Proposed Concept (Acres) =Regional Commercial 14.56 Office =High Density Residential 9.56 Medium Density Residential _Alternative BMPs may be implemented in plan 15.88 Conservation 11.04 Right -of -Way 113.79 Total Development (Acres) AVIENDA ar A 1 E,0111a2AO6 b ,- 0 P h _ ..rs:r�t�rk Net nerd mpmse. axmosr. ry,•ayF. _ Area Devebpable � � C Parking Units/ Section _I ®7t=- • RE K u • 0 Stalls Beds *Site plan is for illustrative purposes only and is subject to change. s - Legend 0 0 M Future Traffic; Signal Existing Traffic Signal Stall Count Public Right Of Way Ponding Preservation C Wetland and Buffer Regional Commercial Office High Density Residential Medium Density Residential RPnional Man Net Building Area Area Devebpable Parking Units/ Section Area (S. F.) Stalls Beds ( �) (Acres) 0 9.93 9.55 108,000 573 0 1.33 1.33 7,000 99 0 9.01 8.57 93,000 128 312 0 9.56 6.32 68,000 We 72 0 5.33 2.97 50.000 197 0 2.58 2.58 30,000 191 0 3.38 3.38 33,000 249 0 3.27 3.27 60,01DD 259 0 1.86 1.63 6,500 115 0 1.57 1.20 6,500 96 0 2.04 1.64 6,500 119 0 1.83 183 7,000 104 0 26.70 26.70 254,500 1364 0 2.45 2.45 25.000 138 150 0 2.58 1.91 25,000 115 100 0 3.45 3.02 40,000 108 92 0 11.04 0.00 nda ria 0 15.86 0.00 ria Na AVIENDA *Site plan is for illustrative purposes only and is subject to change. OPTION 2 Gs OPTION 3 20K 20 { - B SK 30 x_ 72 O + - ~_ F 4 o m +l2 5K . 4"^��# •� ( • F 6 i 4 '� ( • 25K iB Y 7K 7 PO OPTION 4 OPTION 5 `A Cad\ City of Chanhassen Summary of Planning Session Wednesday, April 20, 2016 Participants Mayor City Council Members Environmental Commission Park & Recreation Commission Planning Commission Senior Commission City Staff Leaders Meeting Objective To gain widespread input on the issues of highest importance to the City of Chanhassen as it updates the Comprehensive Plan Facilitation & Summary Report by PARENT EAU GRAVES Chanhassen's Strengths Whv we choose to live & work here: Small town feel Within easy striking distance of big city amenities Parks, lakes & trails Open space; recreational opportunities Community values Family -friendly; healthy; engaged; close knit Kid -friendly Strong schools; beautiful parks; safe; neighborly Great downtown Attractive; walkable Safe Low crime Strong city services Community amenities; can get almost everything here Affordable Housing; low taxes Special attractions Chanhassen Dinner Theatres; library; fishing; 4`h of July! Why Chanhassen? Great community People care about each other; we are good neighbors; people are engaged, helpful, friendly (13 responses) Small town feel in Everything we need is here yet we are close to big city amenities an urban area: (6 responses) Family oriented Great place to raise a family (4 responses) Beautiful Clean, safe and beautiful (4 responses) Excellent schools Choice, quality (2 responses) Prince He lives here/is my neighbor (2 responses) 2 Reflecting on Critical Issues Highway 101 Pioneer Trail to County Road 61 Priority Very high for all but one group, which rated it medium high Positives Opens up Chanhassen's economic possibilities Gateway location provides high potential for business, residential and park growth Considerations Funding Impact on environment, current land use and traffic Preserving and protecting quality of life and Chanhassen's small town feel Suggestions Maintain green spaces and enhance recreational usage Suggestions Emphasize safety in alignment Lifestyle Center Priority Medium for 3 groups; high for 2 groups Positives Helps bring new residents attracted to vibrant lifestyle and services Helps retain current residents who appreciate amenities/quality of life Job growth Considerations Potential negative impact on downtown; should be planned to complement downtown Environmental impact Traffic impact on Highway 5 Suggestions Must be welcoming for seniors 3 Water Conservation Priority Evenly split between medium and high priority Positives Drinking water and aquifer are in good shape Suggestions Reevaluate water fees to promote conservation Evaluate high usage and deal first with those situations Suggestions Ensure water conservation is included in new developments (sod, irrigation, run off, soil prep) Partner with other communities Develop contingency plan Educate the public, leverage state awareness plan Suggestions Continue Waterwise program (promote and enforce) Provide incentives for moisture sensitive watering systems Park & Rec Master Plan Priority Evenly split between medium and high priority Positives Has potential to attract and build community over next 10 years Considerations Additional sporting venues (ice arena, dome, pool) Improved signage Suggestions Safety enhancements Funding for new while maintaining current Athletic field needs (lighting, e.g.) Better access for southern (Valley) green space Improvements in rec center economics to maintain affordability Suggestions Make parks more walkable/accessible for seniors (benches, sidewalks, etc.) Provide welcome packet to promote park and rec amenities Emerald Ash Borer Priority Medium for 4 groups, high for 1 group Considerations Cost comparison for prevention, treatment/removal, replacement Proactive diversification in planting Other environmental impacts of tree loss (erosion, infiltration, e.g.) Suggestions Develop a more holistic environmental impact master plan that addresses invasive aquatic, land development, tree preservation, watershed district Considerations of Other Critical Issues Scale: low = 1, medium = 2; medium-high = 3; high = 4 Low Medium Medium High High Total Average Downtown Redevelopment 0 0 3 16 19 3.8 Infilling 1 4 3 8 16 3.2 Infrastructure 0 4 3 8 15 3.0 Senior Housing 1 4 3 4 12 2.4 Walkability 2 4 0 4 10 2.0 Clean Energy 4 0 0 4 8 1.6 Light Rail 5 0 1 0 1 0 5 1.0 Avienda, a Healthy Way of Life Village Wetland Permit Application Summary Section 1— Project Summary The Avienda project is proposed as a mixed use Regional/Lifestyle Center Planned Unit Development (PUD) that will include a retail hub of specialty shops and restaurants, anchor retail, local supporting retail, hospitality, medical and professional offices, and townhomes and apartments to service an existing trade area population of more than 400,000 residents within and surrounding the City of Chanhassen. Section 2 - Project Purpose and Need In Section 2.1 the Purpose and Need is stated as: To provide a viable mixed use Regional/Lifestyle Center within the City of Chanhassen that will meet local and regional demand and need for the provided uses and implement the City's vision and intent for property based on the current land use guidance plan. Section 2.2 details the components of mixed use lifestyle centers. Section 2.3 documents the City's need for the project. Section 2.4 defines the geographic area for the proposed project. In short, the City first identified the need for a lifestyle center development in the 2008 and updated comprehensive plans. Market studies confirm need and demand for the project at the proposed scale in the City of Chanhassen. Section 3 — Alternative Sites Analysis LEDPA Determination This section provides a thorough and disciplined offsite/altemative sites analysis by investigating 6 Alternatives Sites plus the Proposed Site for project practicability (Figure D of Appendix B). Key to identifying a potentially practicable site was the determination that 90 acres of contiguous buildable area is required for a viable project (Table 1 below). Table 1. Project Required Components with Component Minimum Acreage Required Component Service/Use Minimum Acres Retail Hub (Specialty Shops and Restaurants 25 Office(Medical/Professional) 13 Anchor Retail & EntertainmentlHospitality Entertainment/Hospitality 11 Supporting Local Retail/Daycare/etc. 10 I-ligh Density Residential (approximately 300 units 12 Medium Density Residential (approximately 55 units 6 Stormwater Treatment Varies with site Roadways (circulating traffic system plus collector streets) 13 Total 90 Lifestyle center retail hubs are commonly 25+ acres in size. The retail hub for this site, at 25.67 acres, cannot be reduced without impacting project viability. Acreages provided for high and medium density units are based on standard product sizes to meet PUD density requirements. The remaining required acreages for anchor retail/hospitality, support retail, and office uses are based on market analysis calculations of supporting services that are needed to provide project synergy and viability. The elimination of a supporting component, or a decrease in a component/s gross area will not meet current or future market demands, will negatively impact project viability, and will make the project not feasible or prudent for the developer. Providing sufficient component uses within a contiguous buildable footprint of at least 90 acres in size is critical for project viability, sustainability, and feasibility. Of the alternative sites analyzed, only Alternative Site 5, Alternative Site 6, and the Proposed Site were determined to be potentially practicable sites for the project based on their size and other screening criteria defined in Section 3.2 of the application (Table 2). Alternative Site 5 is the 117 -acre Erhart property located to the southeast of the TH212 and Powers Boulevard intersection. Alternative Site 6 is the 226.5 -acre Bluff Creek Golf Course property. The potential for impacts on aquatic resources (including wetlands) and other environmental impacts that would result from construction of the proposed project on a No Action Site and the three potentially practicable sites were evaluated using numerous applicable environmental factors which are defined in Section 3.4 of the application (Table 3 and Figures N, O, and P). The analysis concluded that locating the project on the Proposed Site is the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) that will meet the Applicant's stated Project Purpose and Need. There are no alternative sites where a viable project could be located that do not affect special aquatic sites, and locating the project on other potentially practicable alternative sites would have more adverse impact on aquatic ecosystems (including wetlands) and other environmental factors. �an.�wu � — ouc LVwI�VY. GYYY VYWGYIII� JRYYEGA1JlWY I..VVY�L�V VJ Section 4.1 provides information on existing land cover, site topography, and drainage areas. Section 4.2 summarizes the wetland delineation and individual wetland characteristics. Section 4.3 provides a summary of the MnRAM analyses and associated applied buffer widths. occuuu o — ocuuencine urscussrun i vnsrre nrrernatrve anarvsrs i.aura uetermmauun With the Proposed Site formally selected as the appropriate site for the project, Section 5 provides an analysis of projected wetland impacts (both direct and indirect) with a No -Build Alternative, a Complete Direct Avoidance Alternative, and a Minimization Alternative. Figure N - Alternative Site 5 Reference Figure (2016 Metro Aerial) N 0 750 AFeet A !�^ KjOLHAUC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY Avienda Mixed Use Regional/Lifestyle Center Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figureare approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Figure O - Alternative Site 6 Reference Figure (2016 Metro Aerial) N 0 750 A6.:::::� Feet s tl 1lJOL.1 AUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY tiv Avienda Mixed Use Regional/Lifestyle Center Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figureare approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Figure P - Proposed Site (Applicant's Preferred) Reference Figure (2016 Metro Aerial) 0 750 6..===j Feet ,L ��— IIJOLHAUV ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY �Vv Avienda Mixed Use Regional/Lifestyle Center Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this fgureare approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Figure 5 - Existing Drainage Areas (2016 Metro Aerial) N A 0 250 Avienda Mixed Use RegionalfLifestyle Center (IES 2015-130) Feet Chanhassen, Minnesota KJOL.HA G ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY Soarte: Mo ;eo, ESRI Imagery 9asemap Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product Central to the evaluation of potential indirect impacts to wetlands with the alternative plans was: a) Calculated wetland drainage area reductions. Any development on the site that meets the guided use will result in significant reduction to wetland drainage areas thereby resulting in significant reductions in supporting wetland hydrology. Drainage area reductions would result in some level of indirect impacts to avoided wetlands. b) Stormwater management plan requirements. Any development plan for the site that meets the guided use and associated impervious runoff abstraction requirements (i.e., the stormwater management plan) will not be able to provide supporting hydrology to avoided wetlands because < 6% of rain days would result in discharge to onsite wetlands. Treated stormwater discharge would not be available to reliably supplement wetland hydrology post -development c) City Code Section 20410(b) states that when a wetland alteration permit is issued, the alteration will not have a net adverse effect on the ecological and hydrological characteristics of remaining wetland. Net adverse effects to ecological and hydrological characteristics are predicted for avoided wetlands surrounded by high intensity land use. The No -Build Alternative is the only alternative that would completely avoid direct and indirect impacts to all onsite wetlands; however, the No -Build Alternative will not meet the guided use for the site The Complete Direct Avoidance Alternative (Figure 7 and Table 7) physically avoids all onsite wetlands but results in indirect impacts and net adverse effects on the hydrological characteristics of avoided wetlands surrounded by high intensity development when in compliance with the requirements of the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District stormwater rules for the guided use. Adverse effects to ecological characteristics of some wetlands is also predicted. This alternative is inconsistent with the City's overall vision for the site, would not meet existing or future demand for services, and is not a viable project for the developer (73 acres of non-contiguous developable area). The Minimization Alternative (Figure 8) impacts 5 scattered, smaller wetlands within the development but avoids the large, central wetland complex. This alternative results in indirect impact to and net adverse effects on the hydrological characteristics of the avoided wetland complex when in compliance with the requirements of the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District stormwater rules for the guided use. Adverse effects to ecological characteristics of some wetlands is also predicted. This alternative is inconsistent with the City's overall vision for the site as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, results in a non-contiguous project, in a non -walkable environment, that lacks a comprehensive circulation system as well as sufficient component areas to service the existing and future market (85 acres non-contiguous developable area). Construction of this alternative would not meet existing or future demand for services, or result in a viable, mixed use Regional/Lifestyle Center project. The Proposed Project (Figure 9) design meets the project purpose, need, goals, and requirements and implements the future land use envisioned by the City of Chanhassen within a contiguous buildable footprint of —93 acres. The project results in unavoidable wetland impacts that cannot be finther minimize and are proposed for replacement via wetland banking. The proposed project design includes a centrally located retail hub with specialty shops and restaurants bordering a pedestrian promenade. Complementing and supporting uses immediately surround the hub, creating an inviting, walkable environment as well as a comprehensive circulation system for all transit types throughout the entire project area. Residential components provide a transitional buffer between uses, as well as a variety of housing types. As shown, the proposed components and their gross areas are currently of a scale and function that will serve the existing and future market and result in a viable project that meets the City's vision for the site. The proposed project represents an orderly and logistical use of the subject property and is consistent with applicable land use and policy plans. The Proposed Project represent a balanced effort to accommodate the project purpose, goals, and requirements, while minimizing impact to the Bluff Creek Overlay District (BCOD), and avoiding and minimizing wetland impacts to the extent practical. Construction of the Proposed Project is the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) that will meet the overall Project Purpose and Need. There are no practicable or reasonable alternative project designs that would meet the Project Purpose and Need of the Avienda mixed use Regional/Lifestyle Center. Section 6.4 — Actions Eli¢ible for Credit Three potential actions eligible for replacement credit were summarized. • Wetland Banking within the same Bank Service Area (BSA9) • Restoration and Protection of Exceptional Natural Resource Value • Project -Specific Wetland Restoration/Creation 4 10 m f 1 rf.38. .J IIr�!,s c e as 0 b O np 0 Legend 119.811saes 'U Fut. T2nK Sgnal 41 14.92 Ap ® E.asry Taft Sgna 4p Sial; 6oum - PoblK Rghl Of Way - Ponding Deve"ble Rmse . • Patdlg Wetkvw and Bolter Raid (Sh k per Regmal Commemal Acres) 08xt IS.F.I High Densly Res'vlenbal Beds Medum Denssy Residential Notes D&,e&WMr40W0ornfor stllarrffic gaposes only ard Sutsecila dow o--:---1 as-- Area Dat, Gras Nee: 119.811saes Mer Areas: ROW 14.92 Ap WcLwxj Net Pmse.v . (alludes redaws) 21.91 Acres Weiland Bulk„Sett c* Parkm Section GAr�ea Deve"ble Building Area Patdlg Unitsr Raid (Sh k per Acres) Area IS.F.I Stals Beds 1.000 S.F lases) a Iter UN) • 6.67 6.67 90.0170 357 4.0 • 1.55 1.55 13.000 51 148 04 5.63 5.43 25.000 77 75 17 9.29 6.38 76.000 Na 38 i 529 2.40 12,500 144 11.5 1.65 106 6.000 35 5.8 • 4.72 472 50.000 359 7.2 • 4.14 4.14 50,DD0 334 6.7 14.25 3.44 50.000 213 4.3 • 1.93 1.93 7000 104 14.9 • 14.19 1272 58.300 583 Ica • 829 4.31 18.000 270 15.0 • 423 3.58 13.000 117 9.0 14.92 000 We Iva 23.13 0.00 nla We Area Dat, Gras Nee: 119.811saes Mer Areas: ROW 14.92 Ap WcLwxj 571 Aaes Pmse.v . (alludes redaws) 21.91 Acres Weiland Bulk„Sett c* 9.49 Aaes Su Wak,Mae * 9.52 Atter Nen Developable Arsa: 58.33 Acrea Aro Of Welbnd Impact. 0 Acres Figure 7 - Complete Direct Avoidance Alternative With Post -Development Wetland Drainage Areas N 0 500 t j� TL7��i�I (Feet `�- KJO7 UG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY �r Legend Property Boundary Waterway Retaining Wall Drainage Areas Sub Drainage Areas Bluff Creek Overlay Distnct Avienda Mixed Use Regional/Lifestyle Center (KES 2015-130) Chanhassen, MN Note: Boundaries indicated on this figureare approximate and do not constitute an official survey product 71w - =SF 100 N' 0 ` 4&L. ID 0 D �� a� _J r-6 m o k�. F ood n V ®I o l ® k�. F ood n Fuue Traffic Sgnal Nty ® Ex*tng Traffic Signal Parking stab count Gross Area Developable Public Right Of Way 0 ParMng Ponding r u Pmsenalnn 0 (�) WHland and Bufferrethao - Regroaal Gmmeroial Beds Off. High Density Re udenpal ( ) Aledum Densly Resderroal Notes Deveio mem plan drown Ior whencibc purposes ony and subled b change 0--:___I a-_ AMOM Ghon Am: 119.85 Ac, Nty aast ROW 1448 Ab Parking Section Gross Area Developable Bu4dlrg Area ParMng Unas1 Ratio (Stags Par 810 Aue, (�) Area (S -F) Stags Beds 1.000 S F. ( ) or per Unto 0 7.68 7.86 90.000 450 50 0 1.80 1.80 7.000 103 14.7 0 1.22 1.22 10.000 50 5.0 0 7.69 712 74,000 370 5.0 0 2.66 2.66 13.000 150 150 10 0 2.75 2S1 40,000 160 80 2.0 0 22.34 19.12 160.000 BD 0 1.95 1.36 6.000 U 7.3 0 5.51 5SI 50.000 361 7.2 0 479 4.79 50,000 363 7.3 0 1393 3.51 50.000 261 5.2 0 7.50 6.04 50.000 327 85 0 7.02 7.02 75.000 400 200 2.0 0 1446 Ho n1a lea 0 1836 0.00 Na Ilia AMOM Ghon Am: 119.85 Ac, Net Ann: aast ROW 1448 Ab 111111 Welland 442 Abel 111111 Presemfin, lexchdes wedandsl 17.0 Acres Wedad BA,Selhad 500Abes Stam Waternnabxssible 810 Aue, Net Developable Area'. 70.74 Acres Area Df Wetland Impact 1.33 Acrae Figure 8 - Minimization Alternative With Post -Development Wetland Drainage Areas Lr N 0 50() ( :jFeet KJOLHAuGENViRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY �+v Legend PrWatY Boundary Relocated Waterway Waterway �11 Relairtlng Wall Drainage Areas Sub Drainage New Bluff Creek Overlay District Avienda Mixed Use Regional/Lifestyle Center (IES 2015-130) Chanhassen, MN Note: Boundaries indicated on this figureare approximate and do not constitute an official survey product m Legend Legend 'a Future Tm%c Sgnal i. Relocated Waterway 4 Ex¢nng Trask Sit" ® Stall Count M PuW10?wa,0 Gross Developable POndng Park pn, , i# , 0 Rato Wei and fiu8er Area Regnnal Canmemal F ) Area IS f.ff OBee Beds Ngh Oensdy Resdenual 6ledum Densly Resdenual Notes DereloPnem play shmri 7a ttMmalc i Only and subsea to change. Drop Am: ke Ariin'. ROW: Wetland' I� Prese n1ra6kdesnelWdst a� Wellin4aAlerlBemark Stam WAw*11i6r1b&!11 e ON Daub8WeAm: Ares Of Weamd kni Figure 9 - Proposed Alternative With Post -Development Wetland Drainage Areas N 0 500 A6 I Feet _u- KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY 11988 Anes Legend Net Property Boundary 16.65 Acres Relocated Waterway 0 IS Accts 1606 ArRs a Retaining Wall Parking Gross Developable Buis Park Units.' Rato Section Area Areaea F ) Area IS f.ff Stang Beds (Suns per (Acres) (�w) 1.000 6F or per unit) 0 8.29 829 111 466 5.2 0 179 179 10.000 115 11.5 0 10.51 7.54 93,000 539 315 1.7 0 9.28 644 76.000 Na 38 0 529 4.10 50.000 306 61 0 1.58 1.56 16.000 35 2.2 0 430 430 50.000 336 6.7 0 4.21 4.21 50.000 337 6.7 0 150 132 6.500 111 17.1 0 1.58 170 6.500 114 17.5 0 2.05 165 6.500 101 15.5 0 184 1.84 7.000 103 47 0 25.67 25.67 257,000 1285 5.0 0 349 349 36,000 187 5.2 0 2.76 276 25.000 185 100 1.9 0 2.58 258 40.000 178 92 1.9 0 16.60 0.00 nia N2 0 16.56 0.00 Na Na _Ana Dm Drop Am: ke Ariin'. ROW: Wetland' I� Prese n1ra6kdesnelWdst a� Wellin4aAlerlBemark Stam WAw*11i6r1b&!11 e ON Daub8WeAm: Ares Of Weamd kni Figure 9 - Proposed Alternative With Post -Development Wetland Drainage Areas N 0 500 A6 I Feet _u- KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY 11988 Anes Legend Property Boundary 16.65 Acres Relocated Waterway 0 IS Accts 1606 ArRs a Retaining Wall 141 Acres 630 Accts Drainage Areas 78.76 Acro Sub Drainage Areas 5.00 Aan Bluff Creek Overlay District Avienda Mixed Use Regional/Lifestyle Center (KES 2015-130) Chanhassen, MN Note: Boundaries indicated on this figureare approximate and do not constitute an official survey, product. Table 2. Alternative Sites Comparison Matrix for Practicability Determination - Avienda Mixed Use Lifestyle Center Project, Chanhassen, MN Practica- bility Factor / Screen Alternative Site 1 (Figure G) Alternative Site 2 (Figure H) Alternative Site 3 (Figure 1) Alternative Site 4 (Figure 3) Alternative Site 5 (Figure K) Alternative Site 6 (Figure L) Proposed Site (Applicant's Preferred Category Project Site) -Figure ?1 Available for Acquisition in the Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes City of Chanhassen Owners 1 Business Partners & 1 charity I private landowner 3 private landowners 2 private landowners 1 private landowner I Association landowner (private 1 private landowner landowner developed land, with potential for redevelopment) Logistics (Parcel Size =90+ac) No No No No Yes Yes Yes Total parcel Parcel = 58 ac Parcel = 50 ac Parcel = 70 ac Parcel = 40 ac Parcel = 117 ac Parcel = 226.5 ac Parcel = 116 ac Wetlands and Wetlands = 2.15 ac; Waterways t = Wetlands = 2.35 ac; Waterways = Wetlands = 13.84; Waterways = Wetlands = 11.75 ac; DNR Wetlands = 37.23 ac Wetlands = 3.31; DNR Watercourse = Wetlands = 5.65; Waterways = 383.5- Other Waters 1,525 ft 1,770 ft 1,100 ft Watercourse t = 830 ft 3,565 It ft & 331-ft Location, Accessible, and Visible Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Interchange Adjacent to Trunk Highway (TH) 5 1 mile to TH 5, 1.75 miles to TH 212. 1 mile to TH 212, 1.5 miles to TH Adjacent to TH 212 interchange. Adjacent to TH 212 interchange. Site —0.5 mile to TH 212 interchange. Site Adjacent to TH 212 interchange. Site distance, roadway interchange, but no direct access via One potential site access point via 5. Site access via two arterial Site access via two arterial roads, access via two arterial roads. Low access via on arterial road. Low access via two arterial roads, and two connections, arterial road. Site access via two arterial intersection, no collector street roads, and one collector street no collector street connections. potential for future collector street potential for future collector street future collector streets. Visible. visibility. collector roads. Visible. connections. Not visible. connection. Not visible. Visible. connection. Minimally visible. connections. Minimally visible. Appropriate Zoning/ Land Use; No (lacks commercial/ residential); Yes No (lacks commercial/ residential); No No (lacks commercial/ residential); No (lacks commercial/ Yes 3 (No - but has low potential to Yes I (No - but has low potential to Yes; Yes (lacks shoreland) Compatible with (lacks shoreland) (shoreland is present) No (shoreland is present) residential); No (shoreland is be changed); Yes (lacks shoreland) be changed); Yes (sufficient buildable Density/Impervious Restrictions present) area even with significant shoreland) (Le., lacks significant shoreland 2) Office, Industrial Office, Industrial. Not compatible Office, Industrial. Not compatible Office" Not compatible w.r.t. Residential Low Density Residential Low Density Dual guided for Office or Regional w.r.t. shoreland. w.r.t. shoreland. shoreland Commemial/Lifestyle Center Layout Relatively Square / Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Rectangular Rectangular shape. Triangular shape One square north area, and one Irregular shape. Rectangular shape. Rectangular shape. One rectangular north area, and one square south area. square south area. Not Practicable Not Practicable Not Practicable Not Practicable Potentially Practicable Potentially Practicable Potentially Practicable Failed size and access screens. Zoning Failed size, access, visibility, zoning, Failed size, visibility, zoning, and Failed size, access, zoning, Site in Chanhassen, of sufficient Site in Chanhassen, of sufficient size, Site in Chanhassen, of sufficient size, is partially appropriate (lacking impervious, and shape screens. South impervious screens. Land along the impervious and shape screens. size, with site access, potential with site access, potential visibility, with site access, visible, appropriate commercial, residential). Also, site is half of site subject to shoreland 5 southwest property boundary Also, site is bisected by Bluff visibility, lacking shoreland, and compatible shoreland limits, and zoning, lacking shoreland, and Practicable Site (and other bisected by a tributary to Bluff Creek impervious restrictions. Peat soils —25 subject to shoreland impervious Creek floodplain, separating the rectangular. Potential for re-zoning rectangular. Potential for re-zoning generally square. considerations) bordered by steep slopes limiting use in acres and requiring correction; restrictions. site into two smaller and separate and collector connection low but and collector connection low but the west third of the site. financial impediment parcels. potentially feasible. potentially feasible. r Waterway = USACE jurisdictional waterway/drainageway/ditch (flow > intermittent). DNR Watercourse = per DNR PWI data. Waterways and Watercourses are not wetland, but are regulated as aquatic resources by USACE. ' Shomland extends 100041 from DNR PWI OHWL (ordinary high water level). Low potential to be rezoned, but considered feasible for practicability analysis. Table 3. Environmental Factor Matrix or LEDPA Determination - Avienda Mired Use Lifestyle Center Prolect. Chanhosm MN Factors No Action Alternative Site Comments Alternative Site Comments Proposed Site tApplicanfs Comments Alternative 5 6 Preferred) Environmental Futon Quantitative Waterway/Watercourse' None NA No waterways/Watercourses within project No waterways/Watercourses within project limits or Impacts (linear feet) limits or the site boundary. NA the site boundary. 383.5 -ft Waterway impacted by development of site. Qualitative Changes in Waterway/ Waterway is currently providing wetland drainage/outlet. If Watercourse Function (onsite aquatic None NA No waterways/Watercourses within project NA No waterways(Watercourses within project limits or NA upstream wetlands are filled with development, Waterway resource) limits or the site boundary. the site boundary. function no longer needed. 7.07 ac non -degraded wetland impacts. 2.77 -ac onsite degraded (excavated wetland with Quantitative Wetland Impacts (acres) None '.07 -ac Wetlands not drained or farm ed, undisturbed 4.12 -ac managed upland) wetland impacts; 1.35 offsite non- 4.00 -ac 4.00 -ac degraded wetland impacts. Wetlands are partially - upland. degraded (undrained wetland with undisturbed upland) drained, farmed, and surrounded by disturbed upland. wetlands impacts. Qualitative Loss in Wetland Functions Impacted wetlands are generally non -graded Impacted wetlands are degraded due to Impacted wetlands area generally degraded due to excavation, (onsite aquatic resource) None I I i_h by nursery/haying and are surrounded by Medium excavation/frequent mowing, and are surrounded by Low drainage, and/or farming and are surrounded by agricultural natural vegetation. maintained golf course or roadway. fields. Quantitative Impacts (acres) to Bluff Creek Overlay District (BCOD Z) None 14.50 -ac 14.50 -ac impacted, 3.75 -ac preserved 0 0 -ac impacted; 100 -ac avoided 2.64 -ac 2.64 -ac impacted, 19.36 -ac avoided and preserved. Qualitative Gain or Loss in BCOD Nome Loss 79% onsite BCOD impacted; 21 % preserved. Permanent preservation by applicant not feasible due to 12% BCOD impacted; 88% preserved. Significant permanent Function Minimal preservation. Maintained size (100 -ac). Gain preservation. Proximity to DNR/open water wetlands, views Proximity to DNR Watercourse, presence of BCOD Cultural Resources N/A Unknown from BCOD and knoll woodland indicates the Unknown with woodland and bluff areas indicates the potential No 2016 survey indicates no resources within project area. potential for cultural resources. for cultural resources. Other Qualitative Factors Indirect treated stormwater discharge to Potential to Negatively Impact downstream Bluff Creek (impaired natural Direct treated stormwater discharge to Bluff Creek via Indirect treated stormwater discharge to lake Susan (impaired Downstream Water Quality/Impaired N/A Moderate stream) via pipe and wetland (1 WO -ft High steep topographic flow paths (500 to 1000 -ft distance), Low lake) via existing treatment pond and wetland complexes Waters (offsite aquatic resources) distance). Indirect discharge to downstream plus direct discharge to Bluff Creek via pipe (1100 -ft (5,400 -ft distance). Indirect discharge to Bluff Creek Lake Riley (impaired water) via wetland (2000 distance). (impaired stream) via wetland 1200 -ft. ft distance). Site is slightly lower than adjacent BCOD and Viewshed Impacts N/A Low is therefore screened from its viewshed The Site is highly visible from onsite BCOD and distant Woodland on high topography screens view from primary site is not visible fromMN river valley to High locations, specifically the MN River National Wildlife Low BCOD. south. Refuge/Minnesota River bluffs. Disturbance to Existing, Perennial Entire site has permanent vegetation cover, Entire site has permanent vegetation cover, site Nearly 60% of site is currently bare ground/cropland/non- Vegetation Cover N/A High site development would cause disturbance to High development would cause disturbance to perennial Low I perennial vegetation. Site development would disturb 20% of perennial vegetated areas. vegetated areas. perennial vegetated areas. Although external boundary is generally Project Area Size and/or 3 Configuration N/A internal developable area Although external boundary is generally rectangular, Project area is generally square and developable area meets (meets project dimensions/goals) ( s/goa No irregular, a irregular, and developable area does not meet of No internal developable area is irregular, and developable Yes project purpose and need. project purpose and need. area does not meet project purpose and need. LEDPA No - Does not meet [No Site has greatest projected wetland impacts Site has greater projected wetland impacts than the Site has the least projected wetland impacts compared to project need and does not meet purpose and need No Proposed Site and cannot meet purpose and need due Yes alternative sites and meets project purpose and need to other factors. Waterway - USACE jurisdictional waterway/drainageway/ditch (flow> intermittent). DNR Watercourse = per DNR PWI data Waterways and Watercourses are not wetland, but are regulated as aquatic resources by USACE. x Bluff Creek Overlay District (BCOD). A contiguous conservancy zone for preservation and enhancement of the natural resources of Bluff Creek. Table 7. Developable Area. Wetland Impacts, and LEDPA Determinadon for AUernadves Considered Project Required Components Minimum Avoidance Required Alternative Acres NDA t (ac) Minimization Alternative NDA (ac) Proposed Alternative NDA (ac) Retail Hub (Specialty Shops and Restaurants 25 0.00 0.00 25.67 Office (Medicat/Professional) 13 14.70 13.81 12.61 2 Anchor Retail & Entertainment/Hospitality 11 1 8.22 10.54 11.05 Supporting Local Retail/Daycare/etc. 10 23.60 17.64 12.87 Residential 18 11.81 28.75 13.98 3 Roadways 13 14.92 14.48 16.60 Total NDA 90 73.25 85.22 92.78 Wetlands Impacts 0.00 1.33 5.00 Remaining Wetlands 5.65 4.32 0.65 Preserved BCOD (excludes wetlands) 20.25 15.48 14.40 Preserved NE Parcel 1.66 1.66 1.66 Total Other Areas 27.56 22.79 21.71 Total NDA and Other Areas 100.81 108.01 114.49 Total Property Bound /Gross Area 119.88 119.88 119.88 Poorly Accessible/Undeveloped Area 19.07 11.87 5.39 LEDPA Determination Does not meet Project Purpose and Need Does not meet Project Purpose and Need Meets Project Purpose and Need NDA = Net Developable Area. All uses measured using NDA except for ROW which is measured as Gross Area. Z Office component is met/exceeded by utilization of two-story office space. ' Residential component is met by apartment design and size. LYMAN BOULEVARD I AVIENDA LYMAN BOULEVARD Legend ED h, Stall Cara Puw %m gWay High DK&ty Redden N otes scnemau: p�r_roses c� . a�c Devel ParkM Section Plat Gross Area D N*pa* BLq ft Area Par" Uniw (Stalls per (tel Area (S.F.) St& Bede 1.000 S.F. (Acres) or per UNt) 0 7.88 7.88 90,000 450 5.0 0 1.80 1.60 7,000 103 14.7 0 1.22 122 10,000 50 5.0 0 7.69 722 74,000 370 5.0 0 2.66 2.66 13,000 150 150 1.0 0 2.75 2.75 40,000 160 80 2.0 0 20.55 1922 160,000 80 0 1.36 1.36 6,000 44 7.3 0 5.52 5.52 50,000 361 7.2 0 4.79 4.79 50,000 363 7.3 0 3.83 3.83 50,000 261 5.2 0 5.98 620 50,000 327 6.5 0 7.02 7.02 75,000 400 200 2.0 0 10.11 0.00 Na We 0 32.72 0.00 We rva AVIENDA .*rte h i LVMAN BOULEVARD Legend 0 L- r- EMWV Traffic Spoef Stan CAlmt Rd* Fbp Of" Pondng Pteseeation 0 wetland and Buffer RegioW Conner I ofsce High Density Redden Math= Density Rewdenbal Notes Development pan shown for schematic purposes only and suged to Utange 14 _1 a• Development Pal" Gross Net Ratio Seciim Developable Area Bu�9 Area Par" urvw u par (Acr�) Area (S.F.) Stalls Beds ( (Acres) or per IMwt) 0 8.29 8.29 90,000 466 5.2 0 1.79 1.79 10,000 115 11.5 0 10.51 10.03 93,000 639 315 1.7 0 7.63 585 76,000 Na 38 0 529 4.68 50,000 306 6.1 0 1.58 1.58 16,000 35 7.3 0 4.30 4.30 50,000 336 6.7 0 4.21 4.21 50,000 337 6.7 0 154 131 6,500 111 17.1 0 1.58 120 6,500 114 17.5 0 2.05 1.64 6,500 101 15.5 0 1.84 1.84 7,000 103 14.7 0 25.67 25.67 257.000 1285 5.0 0 3.49 3.49 36,000 187 5.2 0 2.76 2.76 25,000 185 100 19 0 2.59 2.59 40,000 178 92 2.0 ® 15.88 0.00 Na Na 0 14.91 0.00 Na Na A N D/ O R PRELIMINARY OPINION OF DEVELOPMENT -FEES COMi—.DewbImn[ PIALEHOIDER UPDATED TO= 17 FEE SCNEOULE rMDEnxo.'. scol«m I MAIMDlWeasl MX mIMACLaeMr.Bn o. l.a„ RIE PmFmm.Gu-.aY.quEMvl misas.11a wM. Syls'Ifi GRAND TOTAL 517 949.94] reoanESTIMATED UNIT EsnwTEO UNT OESCRIP11pN OUMFTY UNIT PRICE MIOUNT OUPMIN UNITf2S0EWAe "R=1.1111.. 1SYI 'f.10mmssm.iEPm NlraabMl'{ Rlm flemmP s5Nrs10 Pm I UUU w. R lmmrdl6omm Fr-FatlfIm WAMu1 n R"RmImYM>ilm VYuttn Y NI 1.ONE+' f fO DT IF sl B X90. 19a,E]OCO 10 West Waa>m'�N 31Y1O 52IXOW 11 W�MNm4n \ NEE. 2 GISF— >aE -IOEPNs'.m SVBTOT. SCNFOU. A. APR1CATION FEES fl: AIaS00 00 EsnwTED UNIT E.MAJED uN, ITEMDESCRIPTION OMANTItt UNIT PRICE AMOUNT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOVNT Pe ANNMN_ Fbii ARI fI BY,Ytl.O] uYlf IO N 2 PM DaiWi IBOImII y ui SOLI i0N ]PN W4tlnlCanlvciMl -. @ ma :i' }.1�1. STFi.OLm f J fE.m Om MW E Om'ambPreamvam - f' {{T1.QUOif ISSN.OAmI SUBI ]CHEWLES-PARKDEVICATION f2f6l.6TOR SOOT ESTIMI UMT E.F. UNR TEY DESCRMTpN OVAXIIIY IMIS —E AM.RILE AMOUNT 1 9uYaWYDenlmva im-I Apps6, 12511fi0W ] SUW WMpMuiva Fs -Cameral e® _ f1�pJDO WEFF OT. SLNFUNE.�ETOREM'PTER 15B LI ESTIMATED UNIT EsnwTEo UNrt REM DESCRIPTION OUANTIT' UNI PRICE AMOUNT OUANTT' UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 RV F. W s]2BR1MDO W 302 Rm�SNa�'SxaWky Ikmwlby�piw r .�fsam.USW Ws fO.OI Cmasmlf 6ww lmta Uew I5 O a iO,W 3OMEREMm MCESSAC i9.W U'.m EMCESPJYSudmP SO CO - __, IF ON S TOTAL SCEWIED-yNRMYBEMMER Si5sB1fiW 3lm.MLID ESIWTED UNIT ESnwiED UNrt RFL OESCEI gYN1ITY UXrt PRICE PMWNT OUAMITY UNI PRICE AMWM RNID P®bAllWsr Mvtlm FMA —I 3102198 CO 2 RWMWWYIYMC1ms -YY E4R]3M5' MAI,SCfi fO PC NO ] Wab/amClmpIWAC1 HIE /1S 32]BVRIW A wON REDO 5 wU, REDO SUEEM& SCNEWLE E� WATERMAN f52R,.. 32 ]BI]WDO ESTIMATED UNI A.NATFD UWL rtEM GEURIPTbX oUASTTY .1 CE CUNT AAINA®m OUPM1n UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Rlic5eM 1!/aM ® 2 PEND 3 m WBTOTAL BCHEWLEF-STREETLIGHTS fL®m ESTIMPTEO UNIT ESTIMATED UNIT REM PTION DUAMITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT ANI UNI PRICE AMOUNT FRIC 1 nE Mmal Poalnav lrtpwer-.enl Clww Pes 18 32KUC0 WPI.m 2 tllernv am. -1R—, lmpwemeM TI,— Comm 02 ann U,MblE SR],Rlm SUBTOTAL SCHEOULEG-ROAONAYS SHa YFlm = SICI ill W - {21m8L.m SOW O'EENNNATER s21cNSE.m 30w A lA UAA,Bm IFIM OO ..."ME. IIZEIN EE s]oDDO.E PEE s�+_oNIE_ .oamvAs sus.efiuDO $14 xim 111 SEE OU 798,351 00 $1 GRAND TOTAL 517 949.94] 2017 DEVELOPMENT FEES 1) Administration Fee If the improvements are less than $500,000: 3% of improvement costs If the improvement costs are between $500,000 and $1,000,000: 2% of improvement costs If the improvement costs exceed $1,000,000: 2.5% of the first $1,000,000+ 1.5% of the remainder 2) Surface Water Management (SWMP) Fees. Fees are based on the developable land. Undeveloped areas such as wetlands and buffers placed into an outlot, public parks, and public right-of-way are exempt from these fees. Development Type Per Acre Fee Parks/Open Space $4,590 Single Family Residential $8,080 Medium Density Residential $9,690 Townhouse, Apartments, High Density Residential $14,510 Industrial $20,950 Commercial $30,600 3) Sewer and Water Fees. For residential developments, aop rtion of the sewer and water hook-up fees shall be paid at the time of final subdivision approval. This fee may have been previously assessed on some parcels. Residential Hook -Up Fees are based per dwelling unit. Water Hook -Up: $2,147/unit Sanitary Sewer Hook -Up: $691/unit If the lot or tract of land, or portion thereof, to be served by a lateral utility that has not been assessed for the cost of construction, then the applicant shall pay a lateral connection fee. Water Lateral Charge: $8,833/unit Sanitary Sewer Lateral Charge: $7,710/unit 4) Park Dedication Fees. Single Family Residential: $5,800/dwelling; Multi-Family/Apartments: $3,800/dwelling; Duplex: $5,000/dwelling; Commercial/Industrial: $12,500/acre 5) GIS Fees: $25/plat+ $10/parcel. There is a $5 surcharge if the plat does not contain at least two section or quarter corners, and the length and bearing between them. 6) Street Light Operating Fee: $300/public street light 7) Escrows for Recording (if not collected with the application) Abstract property: $56 plat recording fee + $46/document leg. easements, development contracts) Torrens property: $56 plat recording fee + $20/certificate 8) Collector and Arterial Roadway Improvement Charge. For areas within the City where new developments will impact major roadway systems that the City has identified for improvements. Based on the developable portions of the property. Residential: $2,400/acre Commercial/Industrial: $3,600/acre IL COLLECTED WITH THE BUILDING Watermain (City WAC) $5,010/unit, or $7,157/unit if a portion of the water hookup fee was not collected at the time of final subdivision aooroval. Sanitary Sewer (City SAC) $1,611/unit`, or $2,302/unit' if a portion of the sewer hookup fee was not collected at the time MCES SAC As established by the Metropolitan Council, plus a $75 City surcharge ($2,485 + $75) These fees may have been previously assessed on some parcels. Hook -Up Fees for office or commercial/industrial are based on number of SAC units as determined by the Met Council. Residential Hook -Up Fees are based per dwelling unit. The City SAC ani WAC charges can be assessed for 4 years at 8% interest. If the parcel is within the Lake Ann Sewer District, the following charges shall be paid in addition to the sewer hook-up fee: Lake Ann Interceptor Fee = $1,971.00/unit, and Lake Ann Subtrunk Fee = $2,068.00/unit DISCLAIMER: This breakdown offees is only intended as a reference. The actual fees shall be determined at the time of subdivision review and are subject to change. CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE Effective January 1, 2006 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $600 a. Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers $100 Conditional Use Permit does not include site plan review a. Single-family residence $325 b. All others $425 Grading Permits a. Under 50 cubic yards Not required b. 50-1,000 cubic yards Cost c. Over 1,000 cubic yards Processed as Interim Use Permit Interim Use Permit a. Single-family residence $325 b. All others $425 Notification Signs (City installs and removes $200 Rezoning to Planned Unit Development $750 a. Minor Amendment to existing Planned Unit Development $100 Rezoning all other $500 Sign Permit a. Electronic Message Center $300 b. Permanent $100 c. Temporary $35 Sign Plan Review $150 Site Plan Review a. CommerciaVindustrial Districts $500 + $10 per 1,000 square foot of building area b. Residential Districts $500 + $5 per dwelling unit c. Administrative $100 Subdivision a. Create 3 lots or less $300 b. Create over 3 lots $600 + $15 per lot c. Final Plat $250 d. Metes and Bounds Division $300 + $50 per lot e. Consolidate Lots $150 f. Administrative Subdivision Lot Line Adjustment) $150 Temporary Sales Permit $50 + $50 for additional inspections Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements $300 Variance $200 Wetland Alteration Permit a. Single-family residence $150 b. All other uses $275 Monumentation required for all wetland buffer strip locations $20 (City will install signage and monumentation Zoning Appeal $100 Zoning Ordinance Amendment $500 Filing Fees/Attome Costs Attome s time to ensure proper drafting & documentation a. Recording Documents $50 per document b. Recording Plats & Related Documents $450 + County Fees Consultant Fees Cost will be billed to developer Flood Zone Information and Written Zoning Requests $25 All requests must be made in writing) Property Owner's List $3 per property g:\plan\forms\development fee Sr edule adopted 12-12-05 tabulacdoc Adopted 12/12/2005 Avienda Entitlement Schedule Revise Approved Delineation 01/06/17 02/03/17 2016 2017 Task Name Start Date End Date Comments Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug 11 /-.-rrcRI16 11 (211116 11/29A6 1 11 1 /�6 AUAR Update 11/29/16 04/10/17 _ Task 1 - update development scenarios 11/29/16 11/29/16 no build, preferred and preserve wetland #1 update MeetiRg 11/29/16 01/27/17 with Staff and Developer Workshop with Staff and Developef 12/9516 91/09/17 12/0511-6 0/109417 Meeting with Elected Officials 02/13/17 02/13/17 community open house 02/15/17 02/15/17 Task 2 - Review and Redline Current AUAR 01/02/17 02/10/17 review and redline 01/02/17 02/10/17 Work Shop with city staff 01/30/17 01/30/17 Task 3 - Review and Update Mitigation Plan 01/02/17 02/27/17 Review and Update 01/02/17 02/10/17 Workshop with City Staff 02/20/17 02/20/17 Task 4 - Facilitate Formal Review Process 02/21/17 04/10/17 Planning Commission Public Hearing 02/21/17 02/21/17 City Council authorize EQB submittal 02/27/17 02/27/17 Submit to EQB 02/27/17 02/27/17 _ Notice published in EQB Monitor 03/06/17 03/06/17 10 day objection period/Resolve EQB Comments 03/20/17 03/31/17 Workshop with staff 04/03/17 04/03/17 Council adopts AUAR (If comments are resolved) 04/10/17 04/10/17 MSA Design Variance Application (If Needed) 01/24/17 03/22/17 If needed for Bluff Creek Boulevard Council Authorizes MSA variance submittal 01/24/17 01/24/17 Variance Application deadline 03/01/17 03/01/17 s State Action on Variance 03/22/17 03/22/17 _ Application submittal for PUD Rezoning and 03/17/17 03/17/17 Preliminary Plat (PP) Neighborhood Meeting TENTATIVE 02/15/17 02/15/17 Planning Commission Meeting and Public Hearing 04/18/17 04/18/17 City Cancelled 4/4 PC meeting Cih, r nnnril Annrnvnl r1F/0%/17 nri/n%/17 . . Revise Approved Delineation 01/06/17 02/03/17 Sequencing Plan/Permit Preparation 06/15/16 Request PJD 10/21/16 WCA/USACE Permit Application 01/06/17 USACE Process 01/06/17 Application submittal for Final Plat and Site Plan 06/16/17 (phase 1) Neighborhood Meeting TENTATIVE Planning Commission Meeting and Public Hearing 07/18/17 City Council Approval 08/14/17 Avienda Entitlement Schedule CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2005 MUSA AREA AUAR — 2017 UPDATE Developer Coordination Meeting January 23, 2017 AGENDA 1. DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO UPDATES A. Status of Wetland Issue B. Other Updates 2. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE A. Trip Generation/Distribution/Assignment Modeling B. Traffic Impact Analysis C. Impact Mitigation Measures/Transportation Improvement Recommendations 3. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SUPPLY PLAN UPDATES A. Existing Conditions B. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer and Water System Plans C. Projected Flow/Demand and Impacts to Utility Infrastructure D. Impact Mitigation Measures/Infrastructure Improvement Recommendations 4. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE A. Existing Conditions B. Chanhassen Surface Water Management Plan C. Storm Water Management Requirements D. Impact Mitigation Measures/Infrastructure Improvement Recommendations 5. SCHEDULE/PREPARATION FOR FUTURE MEETINGS Developer Coordination Meeting January 23, 2017 City Council Workshop ? Project Open House Meeting ? Draft AUAR Update Complete ? Planning Commission Public Hearing March 7, 2017 City Council Approve AUAR Update March 27, 2017 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2005 MUSA AREA AUAR — 2017 UPDATE Developer Coordination Meeting January 23, 2017 AGENDA 1. DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO UPDATES A. Status of Wetland Issue B. Other Updates 2. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE A. Trip Generation/Distribution/Assignment Modeling B. Traffic Impact Analysis C. Impact Mitigation Measures/Transportation Improvement Recommendations 3. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SUPPLY PLAN UPDATES A. Existing Conditions B. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer and Water System Plans C. Projected Flow/Demand and Impacts to Utility Infrastructure D. Impact Mitigation Measures/Infrastructure Improvement Recommendations 4. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE A. Existing Conditions B. Chanhassen Surface Water Management Plan C. Storm Water Management Requirements D. Impact Mitigation Measures/Infrastructure Improvement Recommendations 5. SCHEDULE/PREPARATION FOR FUTURE MEETINGS Developer Coordination Meeting January 23, 2017 City Council Workshop .e- 2�1 Project Open House Meeting ? Draft AUAR Update Complete _ ? . Planning Commission Public Hearing March 7, City Council Approve AUAR Update March 27, 2017- - AVIENDA 0 Raninnal Man Legend Development Data Net Parking Future Traffic Signal Gross Ratio Section Developable Area Building parking Units/ (Stalls per Ewsbng Traffic Signal (Acres) Area Area(S.F.) Stalls Beds 1,000 S.F. (Acres) or per Unit) Q Scall Count 0 9.55 9.55 98,000 491 5.0 Q Public Right Of way 0 1.45 1.45 8,000 48 5.3 0 6.97 6.97 183,000 365 225 1.6 Ponding 0 9.34 7.67 76,000 nla 38 _1:0 Preservation 0 5.32 4.91 50,000 273 5.5 0 1.64 1.64 16,000 35 2.2 Wetland and Buffer 0 4.02 4.02 50,000 305 6.1 0 Regional Commercal 0 4.39 4.39 50,000 315 6.3 0 1.46 1.37 8,000 90 11.3 ® Office 0 1.51 1.30 8,000 84 10.5 0 High Density Readenbal 0 2.24 2.07 8,000 119 14.9 0 1.27 1.27 6,000 75 12.5 Medium Density Residenbal 0 19.78 19.78 151,000 807 5.3 0 7.92 7.92 86,000 430 5.0 Notes 0 2.27 2.27 39,000 145 100 1.5 Development plan shown for schematic 0 6.03 6.03 278,200 375 250 1.5 purposes only and subject to change. O 15.93 0.00 n/a n1a ® 17.12 0.00 nla nla ® 1.66 0.00 nla n/a �ORTI 0 150 300 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Alright we have a valid motion. Is there a second? Councilman McDonald: Second. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. McDonald. Any fittther discussion? Resolution #2016-84: Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilman McDonald seconded that the City Council orders the preparation of plans and specifications for the 2017 Street Rehabilitation Project No. 17-01. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you very much Mr. Oehme. Look forward to seeing you in January. That doesn't mean you have the rest of the month off by the way. Okay. Alright. AVIENDA CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW. Mayor Laufenburger: Staff report. Is this your's Ms. Aanenson? Kate Aanenson: Yes it is Mayor, thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, thank you. Kate Aanenson: This application did appear before the Planning Commission on November 1'. I did include in your packet a summary of the minutes that, there were a number of residents that spoke at that meeting and kind of just I think a lot of it is the process itself. Explaining how that all comes to fruition but just concerns about what exactly the uses are going to be. The connections. Walkability. Wetlands. Connections. What types of uses. That sort of thing. Noise and light pollution, a lot of those things which will be also assessed during the AUAR which we'll go into a little bit more detail in a minute. So the subject site is located at the corner of, southwest comer of Lyman Boulevard and Powers and it will get the access off of 212. In the original environmental document this has to be a connection. How that connection works will be determined by the application itself in conjunction with the environmental document that moves forward. A little bit of history on this project. This project did come before the Planning Commission and the City Council last year. At that time only 7 acres were included in the project. Mayor Laufenburger: How many? Kate Aanenson: 70. Now there's 118 acres included in the project. Some of the concerns with just the 70 acres is how did the road, how would the road connection work. How would we balance the two sites and in addition how would the mix of uses be put together so it was always the goal of the City to have it come in as one parcel and that's what we have today. In addition the council did order the environmental document. That was never executed by the applicant and 18 SC l tlr Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 never proceeded. So again to clarify, oh I have a floating little square there. This piece is actually up in this comer here so it's 117 acres and I've identified the land uses. I want to clarify again when this property was guided in 2008 we actually changed the land use designation. It's guided for, it's currently zoned residential but we dual guided it which is a unique attribute that we've done on a few other properties. So when we gave it the commercial there were certain expectations and I'll go through those in a little bit more detail but there was 2 potential uses that, for your consideration. That would be office or the commercial and with the commercial we created a PUD regional commercial zoning district and again I'll go through that in a little bit more detail too. So again the land use designation is the regional commercial or office and is currently zoned low density residential so the uses that would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, what they have to do to go for development would either be the regional commercial or the office. Mayor Laufenburger: Just a second Ms. Aanenson. The zoning on the property is today. Kate Aanenson: Agricultural. Mayor Laufenburger: Agriculture, okay thank you. Kate Aanenson: The land use, when the original AUAR came through was low density and I'll speak to that, how that ties into this whole project. So to, in order to get the regional commercial we put it into a PUD district so it would be more prescriptive. We could call out certain uses and other attributes that we wanted to see with that project. So again for the review of this process I think this is, some of the concern that the residents have is the input on this. It seemed like it's moving pretty fast and the developer's perspective it's probably moving too slow so the concept review that is before you tonight is to gather information. It's non-binding on either parties but in good faith we're moving down a path to say here's our expectation so the things that were brought forward to you were comments given by the residents and the Planning Commission and the staff so our recommendation in the staff report also includes comments in the staff report and I'm not going to go through those. A lot of detail. Just an overview. They're similar to the ones we had last time but so the concept PUD which you're given tonight is to give them direction not only on the uses but some of the kind of the framework issues that you'd like to see. I think the architecture, what we've seen on that and they'll be sharing with you high quality which is certainly their expectation, our expectation. I think there's just some other framework issues that we might want to give a little bit more direction on. So as part of the update of the AUAR there is also a public hearing with that so another opportunity for residents to get engaged. To understand the traffic which certainly was a big issue. Walkability. Safety of the surrounding neighborhoods so that will also be addressed in that. After the AUAR process and that is gone through and approved there will be a development stage with a preliminary plat. That also requires a public hearing before the Planning Commission and would come before the City Council. As a part of that phase you'll be looking at the grading. The layout. The specific details of all the civil plans. Sewer, water, sidewalks, street location so that again just kind of tightening down on those framework issues. And then you would approve the final plat and ITq Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 there would be security placed in that and there might be a phasing plan with that also. And in addition any development that would come in on this project would go through site plan review so whatever buildings would come in they would also require a public hearing and, before the Planning Commission and your approval so there's a lot of opportunities for review and comment. So I put this in here just so I'm not going to spend a lot of time reading it but I just, you know why we put the PUD together and what was our intent and as the City Attorney's always advised us the most important of the city ordinance is your intent. So what we put in here is that with the approval of the concept we're not binding on either party. This is the PUD to say that you know what we want to do is make sure that we have a clear understanding. If the developer is going to go forward, what your intention is so our goals are aligned. And so we're being most efficient in everybody's time and resources so again if you have specific direction or issues it's good to point them out now. With the application of the PUD again in our intent statement is that when we put together the PUD and looked at the regional commercial, and this ties back into the McCombs study that was done a couple years ago and they looked at how much commercial could be put into the site and what those, what the square footages could be for commercial development. Again it was a significant amount. You know 800,000 to 100 and almost one million. Excuse me one million two hundred thousand so 800,000 to 1,200,000 square feet of regional commercial so what the intent way back when we originally looked at this, when we changed the land use was to say this would be more of a regional draw as opposed to what we consider the downtown which is more kind of the daily uses so we tried to separate those and we talked about that when we had our visioning last April with all the different commissions. Kind of talking about that. That this would be, this would compliment the existing uses in downtown and obviously there's a lot of different ways that happens. Different interpretations of that but what we were looking at there is that you'd kind of be more of a regional draw. So looking at some of the uses that would go in there. How would they be more regional than some of the other uses that may be in the downtown that would be maybe the daily need types of things such as banking. Those sort of things. So looking at that was one of the goals that we put into the PUD is looking at some complimentary but not, things that we don't already have in the downtown or in the city itself. So again we broke those into goods and services, entertainment, department stores, comparison shopping, restaurants, specialty, retail, hotels, residential. One of the concerns that the residents brought out with the residential, there was some higher densities and there's ways to accomplish that with density transfers and looking at that but again when we look at the uses itself we want to evaluate that in more detail as we move forward but we certainly think that residential provides a good transition zoning and a buffer zoning in some locations where there's existing residential. Again in our RC district under the intent, as I stated earlier we did say that we wanted to see 2 major retail anchors and a mix of retail uses. So one of the comments we got from some of the neighbors were concerns that maybe there wasn't enough retail. Maybe it wouldn't be a regional draw so there's some, again that's something I think we're both trying to understand. Both parties, the City and the developer trying to understand what that mix is. So here is the developer's proposal. Again it's not the detail. Concept doesn't require that level of specificity. What we're trying to do here is get the square footage. Is that approximate and then based on that we will do the analysis for all the environmental documents. It doesn't show grading. It doesn't show the level of detail for 20 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 landscaping. That sort of thing. The one thing it does show is that the, some of the wetlands in the middle would be removed with this plan. I think that was a concern and that's a process that we'll have to go through as part of the environmental documents itself. So again to clarify where we looked at for building square footage, we're within that range of what the McCombs study said in 2014 for the amount of retail space. Again that also includes some of the office space and we know there's obviously a symbiotic relationship when you have daytime users and there's commercial so I think that's a healthy mix. I think some residents were concerned about the apartments, townhouses and some of the hotels. Well we also always felt that that was a good mix. When you have a hotel in town that's able to benefit from some of the other uses that are in there so we think the mix is important. It's what that right amount is and how that all works which as we move along we'll learn a little bit more detail of. Again. Mayor Laufenburger: Kate is this document that we're looking at right now on the screen, is this a City document or is this from Avienda? Kate Aanenson: That's from Avienda. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you. Kate Aanenson: We did create the summary of uses because it was a little difficult to understand how many units were in there based on the way they displayed it. They just showed it in a little bit different, so we added up the retail so the actual retail is under 400,000. If you add the restaurant office in so they've broken it, we've broken it down a little differently. So if you look at what the original anticipating more retail so that's a question. You know is that, does that make it regional? Does it not make it regional? But again we always anticipated the mix and I think there was some concern that we talked about at the Planning Commission, it's similar to what we did on Villages on the Ponds. You know we had institutional use, that was the driver there. And then we also had a healthy mix. We have Presbyterian Homes, the residential there and then some other support commercial and that too has evolved over time as we looked at that. We did clarify at the Planning Commission when we do the traffic study and kind of come up with some thresholds, things change over time and so some, in some of this we need to build in flexibility of what uses come and go. They're not all going to be the same today as they will be in 10 years from now so as a part of that PUD, building in kind of that menu of choices of things to come and go. Again tying that back to what the 2014 study said. This is from the McCombs study for retail. Breaking those down. Again and this one didn't have the office amount that they're putting in. Kind of the, along the northern edge which is a good buffer. Office. It's just how that entire mix works. So again the wetland in the center of the project is one of the areas that certainly is of importance to them to work on the relocation of that wetland. That's going to be part of the AUAR. I know that was some concern to some of the residents. There's some other framework issues that we talked about and that's connecting some of the streets was some concerns but we believe we can connect those and make those safe for both. The school district did comment on those regarding if we have residential there that there's good access for buses and the like so I didn't go through all the comments in there but certainly we're confident with 21 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 the environmental document that we'll be addressing those in a much deeper level to address the concerns that were raised by the residents. I believe that's the only thing I had to add. Again there's a lot more detail in the, regarding water resource comments and the like but I also wanted to add, you did have the verbatim minutes from the Planning Commission also included in this packet and there's great comments from the residents regarding noise and light pollution and all those things will be studied in the environmental document. It's part of the challenge when you do a mixed use project and you have existing residential but we're confident we can address all those with the project itself so that's all I had. I know the applicant, we are just looking for your feedback and move that along but I know the applicant would like to make a presentation also. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright before I ask the applicant to come forward I'm just going to ask council. Council do you have any questions of staff at this time? Anything you'd like to ask. Kate when you talk about the environmental document, you're talking about the AUAR, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: It's a component of the AUAR. The AUAR includes environment, traffic, a number of different elements. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: But your use of the word environmental documents specifically addresses the AUAR. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Let's see, okay. I know the applicant is with us tonight. If you would like to speak to the council we'd love to have you here. Just ask that you state your name and address please for the record. Bahram Akradi: I'm Bahram Akradi, 4300 Oak Road, Minnetrista. Mayor Laufenburger: Welcome Mr. Akradi. Nice to have you here this evening. Bahram Akradi: Thank you. First I want to thank you Mayor and the council for hearing us today and I also want to thank you guys for being such a great home for me and Life Time for so many years. However this, as you guys know this project has nothing to do with Life Time so my goal today is to give you guys a little bit of history on how I actually got involved with this. Give you guys a little background on the vision I have for this and how I'd like to proceed with the City in partnership to move forward with this thing and then introduce the team. Let them you know kind of talk to you and then this is going to be work in progress as we move forward. Okay so. 22 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Let's just, Darren do you have some slides that you want to show? Kate Aanenson: Yep. Darren Lazan: Working on it right now. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay let's just wait until they get that up and running. Kate Aanenson: Sorry we lost the, there we go. Mayor Laufenburger: There you go. Mr. Akradi. Bahram Akradi: Ahight. So as you guys know this project was brought to you by different groups, Scott Carlson a year or 2 years back. Mayor Laufenburger: March of 2015. Bahram Akradi: 2015 and he had along the way mentioned to me about this project and see if I wanted to, if I had an interest to be an investor and with all the different things that was going on with me and Life Time busy until we finished our transaction with Life Time and then quickly it got to the point where there was kind of a timeline to make, to take an action on buying the land from the people he had it under contract so I wanted to step in but I wanted to step in not as an investor but as somebody who takes over and do it you know in my style. And so what we looked at was to take over the 79 or 70-79 acre parcel that goes around but as Kate mentioned when I looked at that and looked at the whole development it just didn't seem like it was a workable deal. The 2 pieces of land as Kate mentioned really, the land wants to be developed as one whole piece. Not as 2 separate pieces. It would be just too difficult for 2 different developers to try to come together to do that so I had to reach to the folks who had the other parcel, the 40 acres. LCR and we met and we worked. It took several months to work together to try to put this thing together as one development. I have a company by name Arius Development. Roasted Development. I have a partner in that. Arius is the managing partner and then LCR came in as a limited partner and we basically have created this entity to kind of take on this project and move forward. Mayor Laufenburger: So Mr. Akradi, in March of 2015 the council was presented with a, essentially a concept that included only 80 acres. Bahram Akradi: Right. Mayor Laufenburger: And now you're saying this concept includes all 120 acres. Bahram Akradi: All yeah. 23 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Though the ownership of that property isn't important to us, the development through Arius through Level 7 is one developer. Bahram Akradi: One developer and one thought. One whole project. So it took some time. Obviously you know 2 different developers have different ideas of how they want to develop that thing and what their expectation is of the economics so it just took some time to make sure that piece works before I could move the project forward to the next phase so we did that. And then beyond that what I really want to point out to you guys is today we at Life Time I have developed about 14-15 million square feet of real estate over the last 20 some years so we have been in the process, constantly we've been in the process of buying land. Developing. Going to cities. Albeit I'm extremely rusty so I apologize. I think it's been probably 15 or 20 years since the last time I've been to a City Council meeting myself but I'm really. Mayor Laufenburger: You're doing good so far. Bahram Akradi: Hub? Mayor Laufenburger: You're doing okay so far. Bahram Akradi: I'm really looking forward to this project. Personally my vision is to build something beautiful. Timeless and something that I can be proud of as a development and I want to do this purely 100 percent as I mentioned to Kate, to Todd, to you Mayor as a partnership with the City. I have no interest in pursuing the project in anything other than that so our goal is to put together a whole thought. Bring it to you. Make it something that works for everybody. Of course that's the challenge to create a win, win, win for the neighbors, for the community, for the City, for it's objective and for the development. To make sure it all comes together so the, on the big picture besides building something great, grand and you know timeless we need to build mixed use. As I am dealing with real estate across the nation right now, I am in the process of developing healthy living, healthy aging, healthy entertainment complexes across the whole country with all the major reads. Converting some of the big, big regional malls into these healthy living, healthy aging complexes. As they are having trouble with the big anchors like Sears and JC Penny's and Macy's that they have too much retail so with the transition in the way people are moving, shopping, and buying things online. Going to the places. The old style of retail is not working. I have no interest in developing 120 acres or whatever is developable, 80- 90 acres of land strictly as retail. Strictly as office. Strictly as, none of that will really work. There is too much of any one thing in that space so it needs to be a really well thought through mixed use development. It also needs to be regional. It's a big site. It's the gateway of Chanhassen. I think it needs to be a complimentary element, as Kate said again to downtown but it also needs to be something that adds all sorts of components and benefits to the City. So we're fully excited to be a part of it. We're excited to work with you on this. Listen to what you guys have to say. What the City wants. I've asked the team, my demands is basically fust class every which way from everything we do. Beautiful and that's really what we're working on. So I 24 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 want to talk to you about the team a little bit. So the project is so big and it needs so much day to day, so much day to day work that there is no way that I can be the day to day project management, development person for that so right before this last few months I had Mark Zappe who used to be the head of real estate for me before and he retired, take over but then last few months he had some personal injuries. He had to work on that so we have replaced Mark Zappe's responsibilities with Mark Norland and his partners from Launch Properties. They have exceptional experience with development over the last 20 plus years so they're a great team to work on day to day, seeing the project through. The brokerage is Tom Palmquist from Collier. The architecture is RSP. Jeff Hysjulien is one of the partners there and he basically was with them, worked with me for many years and then because of his wife moved to North Dakota and came back and we just wanted to make sure find a way to work together. He's back. We spend a lot of time working on Life Time projects or Avienda project together and then the engineering firm is Darren Lazan and he's worked with us many, many years so I know the whole team. Everybody's capable and I'm going to tum it over to them unless you guys have any questions for me. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright just a moment. Any council, any questions for Mr. Akradi? Bahram Akradi: No? Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you very much. Bahram Akradi: Okay, thank you so much. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay thank you. Jeff Hysjulien: 'Thank you for having us here this evening. It's very exciting to be back in front of you to be able to share more of the vision and the design inspiration that's involved with this project. As Bahram had mentioned there's been a lot of people that have taken a look at the opportunities on this site and we're very excited to be a part of watch and go to the next level for the design and enhancement of this property. Mayor Laufenburger: Could you just remind us of your name Jeff. Jeff Hysjulien: I'm Jeff Hysjulien with RSP Architects and Bahram did a great bio on me, thank you very much. Mayor Laufenburger: Welcome back. What did you like about North Dakota. Jeff Hysjulien: Opportunity of timing. It was a very unique window of time. Mayor Laufenburger: Nice to have you back. 25 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 Jeff Hysjulien: Yes thank you very much. As we'll be showing here on the prompter we have really taken a broad general idea, what is the character and the design essence that really wants to be what Avienda will become. We know the importance and the significance of the property. The location. The gateway aspect of how this is the front door for many people arriving to the community and be able to set the right tone. I think Bahram had mentioned timeless and sustainability as two key mantras that we will always look back both when it comes down to design but also from leasing and making sure that the tenant mix is right for the property. Let's see if we can kind of go back one more here. And again what we wanted to talk about here is kind of what is the spirit. What is the character? These buildings will be designed as they come online. We do know there will be multiple checkpoints as the project moves forward so we will be able to engage both planning and City Council as this project moves forward but some of the key elements we really want to talk about is this is a pedestrian friendly development. It's going to fit into the neighborhood. It's going to have connections within the Chanhassen community and that's a very key piece. I think Bahram also mentioned the notion of the healthy way of life village. This is going to be something that ties in both young and old in a diversity of mixes and that's one of the key aspects for this. And as we all know exceptional quality. Both to the materials that it's built from but also when it gets down to the right ingredients to make sure that this has more than the sum of all of the parts and we're very excited to move this forward. We have some character images of what this could possibly look like in the future. This is what we call our signature gateway entry. We pay special attention to making sure the quality level, both of the landscaping, the foreground, the materials and what you see as you arrive to this property. Mayor Laufenburger: Jeff just for a moment. Just for those people who are watching at home or in the council, what we're seeing now this is the entry from Powers Boulevard, is that correct? Jeff Hysjulien: Exactly. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Jeff Hysjulien: This is, we were in a helicopter looking back on the intersection. This is the character of what you would be able to see really to try and show that there's a depth of this arrival sequence. There's some functional aspects. We talk about traffic controls all of which will be reviewed in the AUAR that we want to treat all of these as opportunities for aesthetic enhancements to the property. You can see that there will be a level of stormwater management will be involved with this project. How can we make that a very visually appealing aspect for this property? I don't know if we can go to the next slide as well. How do the buildings engage these elements? What are the buildings, the quality of the materials and also making sure that there's that pedestrian connection that ties both back into the single family housing area but also within the community. Within the development itself. We can go to the next slide. A key piece that we have is the visibility that's along Powers and the north/south road. We really take a look at that as an opportunity for what we're calling restaurant row. That has a prominent site location. Again we talk about the stormwater pond. How can we make that a very strong amenity to this development? Kind of speaks to the character and quality. And also looking for Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 upscale venues and that really gets down to, as Tom Palmquist and team will be able to go through and find that right tenant mix that really enhances the community of Chanhassen. This next image is to show kind of the character of what it could be. Stormwater ponding does not necessarily have to be set aside into the back and really a subdued element. Let's really try to find a way to energize that and enhance it. We talk about lighting in certain areas. This has an entertainment component to it so in certain areas we want to make sure that it's very dynamic and appealing and energetic. This is one of the opportunities that we can see happening along that Powers Road. This is a what if as far as if a restaurant could also be able to take advantage of that amenity. Could there be outdoor dining that looks over the top of the ponding? Could there be connections to tie in for walkable access to this as well as outdoor trellises and really maximizing the opportunities for our climate. We've got another view here. And again this is really trying to tie it in so that it has outdoor amenities. Landscaping. Trellises. All the elements to really add that level of quality that are going to be key and notable for this development. We also know that there's going to be some retail and hospitality with the visibility along 212 so what we want to take a look with that is making sure that we enhance that visibility. Making sure that it has that way find that draws you into the development. That it starts to generate activity to the site. As Bahram had mentioned this is meant to be a mixed use that brings this ingredient to draw in those daily trips but also becomes a destination and again a regional attraction. To have a diverse mix to be able to have many opportunities to have the synergies that will provide for the success of this development. Again when it comes down to what are the materials that could be a part of the building designs. I would look at it as timeless architecture. Quality materials. Natural stone. Brick. Earth tones. Elements that really have a strong timeless aspect to them and also thinking very consciously of lighting. Accent lighting. Washing surfaces and being very cognizant of having that level of energy that comes along with that. We have another view of what it could look like. And again these were all meant to show the spirit and the character of what it can be and as the project starts to develop we'll be able to share specific information on all of these buildings. We talk about lighting. This is a key piece too. We're very blessed to have these very long winter evenings so the lighting of what the appeal is after 4:30 or whatever time the sun started to go down tonight, that that will be a key aspect for how we look at the approach for the design. We have talked about the mixed use component that has multi -family housing. We really look at that as being a transition from the overall site diagram. How you proceed into the site coming from Powers within the development and making a conscious transition over to the single family housing. We've talked about the walkability which is a key piece and again this is kind of composite of what these materials could be. You'll see a consistency that comes along with natural stone. The color palette has a very earth tone and very strong grounded nature to it and the proportions have a very robust sense of engaging the ground plane. We do know that there's an opportunity for offices. With this the placement was very much, as Kate had mentioned, it's a great transition to come along from the existing neighborhoods. We see it happening along that northwest or the north property edge and again visibility and access provides that synergy. That mixed use mix that helps compliment both the retail and the restaurants and really looking to have a signature architectural character that comes along with each specific building. Again when it ties into what they could be all of this will be vetted out as the design moves forward but natural 27 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 materials. Stone. Glass. Natural daylighting which is a very key component for office designs. Those will all be brought into the design palette. And again we talk about the character of the foreground. How you and I will experience the space as we walk through this area. It gets down to pathways. Bike paths. Pedestrian connections. I'm also talking about sustainable design principles. I think Darren will be able to allude to that later on in the technical discussion of the project and also making sure that the plantings and landscaping tie in with the very native and environmentally sensitive landscaping strategy. With that it gets down to the hardscape. You'll see that certain elements, lighting. Benches. Roundabouts should they be in the project. That they all become a very articulated and detailed architecturally designed element. Even getting down to details as we start to get deeper into the project. And with that I believe we've covered it so thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. Hysjulien. Just remind us our name Darren please. Darren Lazan: Sure, Mr. Mayor, members of the council my name is Darren Lazan. I'm with Landform Professional Services. It's good to be before you again tonight. You've gotten the charm and the glamour out of the way and now I'll try not to drag it down too much as we move forward. Mayor Laufenburger: Wait a minute, I thought there was a lot of substance in what they were talking about Darren. Alright continue. Darren Lazan: That too. I don't know if I'm going to be able to go through this. Kate can you do it Kate? Yeah sorry. So a little bit of background on how we got here. As you recall in 2014 a study was done by Jim McCombs, McCombs Group Limited that identified a regional trade area focused on this site and as the exhibit from Jim's report shows, while there is a small southwest quadrant of the Twin Cities area that's served by this site, the majority geographically is quite a ways down the adjoining highways and quite a large geographical area so it has been vetted and shown to be a regional commercial site. There's certainly regional commercial components and that's what we look to build upon. So in that study, and again these are just quick excerpts. If you have questions we can go into detail further. I didn't want to go through the whole study but as you recall from previous meetings as well there's a fair amount of dollars that are attributed to that market study that are available or could be served by this site. In this case the retail opportunity here was estimated at roughly $705 million dollars annually. That's both from within the city of Chanhassen. Those are dollars that are leaving your community and those outside the community that aren't being spent here so we see that as a tremendous void in the region and one that can be filled. When we translate $705 million dollars annually you get roughly 1.1 or a little over a million square feet of that regional space that would support that level so quite typical to a regional center. Million square feet. That is vetted out through the study as a viable marketplace. When we look at what's proposed today, and Kate went through this a little bit. When we combine our office with our pure retail play we have roughly 620,000 square feet so you can see, and this is important only in that folks may express concern are we over building the market and so forth. We are looking at right around half of the available retail ED Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 capacity on this site so we're really focusing on right sizing this project to be a successful project going forward. Picking those right users. Combining the uses and making sure this is a viable project going forward. Next. There's a handful of references in your staff report of other regional centers in the area. Some comparisons made. I just wanted to call a few of these to your attention quickly starting in the upper left band comer. This is Riverdale Village in Coon Rapids. Total approximate area of 255 acres so it's well over twice the size of our project. Roughly 969 or roughly a million square feet of retail in that area comprised of a number of anchors and major retailers. Tamarack Village, one of the older centers in the comparisons today doesn't have an anchor per se. There's some adjoining but doesn't have one inside. That one's about 113 acres so very similar in size and as you break that down their retail was roughly 759,000 so three-quarters of a million marketplace if you compare Tamarack. Continuing straight down one of the more recent, when you take Woodbury Lakes and the Commons area in combination you have roughly 224 acres and 774,000 square feet of retail with a couple anchors in that mix. And then finally a closer example and one that's been fairly successful is West End area including some of the original retail play in there. They have a couple anchors in there but they're roughly 149 acres. Little more footprint than Avienda but they have a mix of high density residential and office, very similar to what's being proposed but their retail component is almost a million square feet so one more here. So if you look at those services that get, that comprise one of these centers, and this is right out of the staff report as well, we look at a mix that works in this location that's comprised of entertainment. Some department store shopping. Comparison shopping. Specialty retail. Restaurants and hotels. Next one. And Kate went over this so I won't waste too much time on this. It's zoned and guided for a mix or a dual zone, dual guiding for either office or regional commercial and currently zoned Ag which is a holding district I believe for the PUD. And I want to talk a little bit about the AUAR process. I know that's a second agenda item tonight so I rolled this into this presentation so we won't need to hop back up again unless you have questions on the AUAR but in 2003 originally and adopted in 2005 the original AUAR boundary shown in white up here was completed. Our project is in red up in the corner as you're aware. At that time if you look in the upper left hand corner it was contemplated that much of the commercial uses would be in the southwest corner of the project. The pink areas there identified office and other retail uses and the remainder would be residential. Well we know that the project didn't develop that way. Much of the residential uses went in that area and later comp plan and re -guiding showed a desire to have the regional commercial or those commercial components up in the northeast corner where it made a lot of sense with the Highway 212 connection and so forth but that AUAR hasn't been updated so what we're doing in a later agenda item tonight is requesting you authorize the update to the AUAR and proceed with that as well. Sorry. There was a period of time in 2012 where there was some work done in advance of an update and I bring this up, this was done by staff to contemplate this comer when a regional commercial or a commercial play was discussed in the northeast corner and you can see for reference that it contemplated a mix of some regional commercial uses. Some office uses. Some medium density residential and some high density residential and all 3 configurations are very similar to what we proposed today. Next slide. This is how those uses break out and Jeff walked through some of those in order as we went around but we predominantly show the red retail components at the major access points where those trips can 29 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 be best served. We show residential, both high density and medium density more on the west and south sides. Transitioning to those neighborhoods and then office on the north transitioning to those areas on the north as well. And this is one generation newer than the one in Kate's report but largely the same. We look at the residential components on the west and southwest. Office along the north and the red retail commercial plays in the middle. The middle, if you can switch to one more. There's been a lot of discussion about the middle of the project or the more lifestyle component or the village component. The plan that's been submitted shows one option but I just wanted to show you we've been considering a number of options for that middle section. This really is the highest value retail component. This is where we see a lot of the landscape architecture. A lot of the public spaces. A lot of the higher end shops existing in the center of this where the retail in the southeast is more likely to be anchor and have a more neighborhood play, more neighborhood character than the regional component in the middle. But this one shows kind of a range from a fair amount of green public spaces and landscape components and amenities through I think Option 5 was fairly straight forward but all of them contain very high end quality materials in the landscape and the architecture as Jeff walked through. And then a brief mention on the schedule and Kate went through in detail some of those steps but we really look to get through this concept phase now as we're here tonight. It kind of represents a culmination of that concept design piece. We'd like to kick off the AUAR tonight and work to get that done by spring. And then we look to parallel our PUD and rezoning, preliminary plat approvals with those efforts so as that information comes in from the environmental review we have the opportunity to incorporate that. There has been a fair amount of work in preparing for those applications. We've had now our second neighborhood meeting. We've gathered that information. Collected that to help inform the design as we move forward. We look forward to getting your information tonight to continue that effort and then look to complete construction documents late spring and get under construction as soon as possible in 2017. So with that I think that's a brief run through. We certainly have everybody here to stand for any questions but we are excited to have this before you tonight and look forward to your comments and incorporating those into our subsequent applications. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright thank you Darren. Before you step down just council, any questions of the applicant we can direct through Darren at this time? Mr. Campion. Councilman Campion: I have one question right now. Talking schedule that's up here, for development of this magnitude from the time of construction start, you know assuming that's August, 2017, when would the first shops open? Darren Lazan: Excellent question Mr. Mayor, council. You know there's been some thought as to the phasing and the approach to this project and our thought today is to come in with an infrastructure package when we break ground next summer and focus entirely on the grading, storm water, sewer, water and streets that need to be put in to make those connections from the east to the west. And that likely is going to take all of 2017. I think there's a chance that pads could be opened up on the south side, especially of the Bluff Creek Boulevard as early as very Wo Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 late '17 but most likely spring of '18 for the larger scale of construction and then those will open as they come through the process over the next year, two years, three years. Kate Aanenson: Mayor if I may just add a little bit to that too. Mayor Laufenburger: Please do. Kate Aanenson: So with the City Engineer and myself meeting there's a lot of earthwork to move. There's the sewer and water you know as part of this. The main thread that ties the east and west is Bluff Creek Boulevard so the phasing plan, all of those will be discussions with the preliminary plat as they're working on that. There's just a lot of like I say framework issues to resolve and a phasing plan but I think they've talked about on the economies of scale of kind of doing most of that utility services at once. 'There might be some areas around that perimeter that they could wait on but a lot of that's going to, as we work through this process kind of get a better handle on that. Meeting with the neighbors and through the AUAR. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Mr. Campion did you have any other questions? Councilman Campion: That's it for now. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay council any other questions? This is a great time you know to bring forward if you have a question of Mr. Lazan. Anybody? Councilwoman Ryan: Are we doing general questions and comments? Mayor Laufenburger: General questions. Yeah let me if you wouldn't mind let me just clarify this. We will, we're going to address the concept PUD to start with. The second item will be discussion of the AUAR and either eventually ordering of the AUAR or not but the first part is let's get questions and then concluding the questions I will ask each council member to offer comments and suggestions to the developer on what you would like to see so one of the, one of the specific requirements we have as a council is to offer our comments to the developer so they hear from this council what it is we would like to see but if you would like to have clarifying questions now would be a great time to do it. Council understand what my plan is? Okay, alright. So if you have questions, general questions of any sort now would be a great time to ask. Councilwoman Ryan: I don't know who will be to answer them but I'll direct them to you and then whoever needs to step up. Darren Lazan: Sounds great. Councilwoman Ryan: I just have a little bit of a disconnect when I look at some of the different pictures and you know Mr. Akradi's, his vision and when you speak I think you said that you're looking for you know a healthy way of life village. And then I see some of the plans that come 31 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 up, village options. And then I compare those to what Mr. Hysjulien presented and they're all, did I say that correct? Mayor Laufenburger: Hysjulien. Councilwoman Ryan: Hysjulien. Oh Hysjulien. Or Jeff. I'll just call you Jeff. We go way back right Jeff? So I see you know, I'm trying to get an understanding of what the real vision is and you know some of the comments or questions that we get from our residents is we don't really want to be a Woodbury and we don't want to be a Coon Rapids and when I see Jeffs pictures that's exciting to me. When I look at some of the village options where it looks similar to that, that concerns me and so I would just like some clarification on you know what we should be anticipating. Darren Lazan: Sure. Bahram Akradi: Darren I'm going to take this. Darren Lazan: Yep come on up. Bahram Akradi: So I don't like. Mayor Laufenburger: Would you. Bahram Akradi: You want me to come up. Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah we're broadcasting this Bahram. Bahram Akradi: Any of these 4, just want to be clear. What, the one that we're showing you right now, go to the main picture. This one I like to build kind of a streetscape. Walking right in the middle of those little shops. Have connections from all directions. I like to really make it so you want to walk around the space. The reason we are not coming to you with a hard fast deal because that's not the way it's going, the reality is we're going to have to respond to what the market wants. We have to capture a whole bunch of different interested parties, which is what Tom's doing right now. We have a huge list of people and then once we get that we have to try to piece it together. The tenant mix is going to be incredibly important and how we mix these things so right now just to give you guys a bit of a comfort, it feels like there is enough interest momentum for almost everything in the perimeter. Like those office buildings for medical office we have some interest. We're checking with the different clinics, different providers in Twin Cities to make sure we go to all of them and find out who are the people who want to build additional amenities in the community and then either we get a professional organization to build those for these guys. We sell them the land and demand the look or I develop them myself and lease it to them, whichever one it would take. So I think we will get, and we have a whole list of people who are, that have been contacted by Tom or they've contacted us. I get calls from, since 32 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 this has been kind of a little bit publicized in the papers and stuff we've been getting calls from a lot of different brokers. They all want, they feel like they have interest to bring people in so once we get a little bit more of that and start getting some of the pieces then we will be able to design the right combination of stuff and come back to you with a more focused plan. But if you look at through all of them you know we've put this one on paper on purpose because this is the one I like the most. I just have to find the right uses for that. That middle part really has got to be done tastefully and it needs to have benches and sidewalks and you know streets. I mean it needs to look like a Vail village and that's what I really want. If you're walking through Vail village that's what I want to get there. Councilwoman Ryan: Right. Bahram Akradi: With pavers and you know not all asphalt et cetera but it's just a PUD at this point. Councilwoman Ryan: Right and you had mentioned because I know speaking of PUD's I believe that it was in there that we wanted 2 anchor stores but then in your introduction you said that you have been going around to regional sites and have changed from regional centers that have these anchor stores to smaller, you know to the healthy way of life villages so do you think that there's a need for these anchor stores or not? Bahram Akradi: So let me give you a little bit of background because I'm on the phone all day long with developer throughout the day. Right now the movement in the country is away from enclosed malls and into what's considered open air. The other thing is a little bit more direction towards even in the suburban areas people are gravitation towards a little more urban look so maybe shops on the main floor and then you know residence on the top et cetera. When the market allows it so when I mentioned to you this healthy way of life village I envision a place where there's a senior housing. There is kids you know kind of a school. There is people who are middle aged, young et cetera. Everybody is kind of mixed in. I don't want to do the same thing at a million square feet. It's kind of, that becomes more like a power center which is really kind a thing of the past and enclosed malls are all redoing their, piece by piece and so the other thing that I would mention to you guys is in UK there is 4 square feet of retail per capita. In Germany there's 3. In United States there's 24 square feet of retail per capita so we're struggling with retail. There's too much retail and so you really have to right size that. Now if you look at the real estate in US, 4 to 5 square feet out of the 24 they're doing fantastic because they're in dense urban areas that there isn't enough retail space so if one tenant goes out there's 3 other waiting to go into that space. The other 19 square feet is struggling to keep the tenants so what I'm going is I'm taking basically what I've done is I've taken one of these malls, let's say like Southdale and actually have shown the developers, the owners what it could look like 10 years from now if it had gradually shrunk in the middle. Built in the perimeter and eventually the middle goes away and becomes open air. Similar to what we are showing here but that's a transition plans for them so this is relatively easy because we don't have all the obligations they have with the tenants and the leases that they have to work. They have to buy people out and it's 33 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 a lot of work when you're coming back from that. So that's what we want to do but what I can tell you is that my goal is to make sure whatever we do it's classic and beautiful but it has to market has to dictate within that desire it has to be market driven. Does that make sense? Councilwoman Ryan: It does yes. Bahram Akradi: Okay. Any other questions? Councilwoman Ryan: Mine are mostly have to do with the AUAR so I'll hold off on that. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Councilwoman Ryan: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Anybody else questions? Mr. Campion go ahead. Councilman Campion: I guess one more thing occurred relative to parking. I mean in each of the concepts you see a fair amount of parking lots apparently above ground. Are there like West End and some of the others are there options being looked at for pulling more of that parking below ground? Darren Lazan: Sure this concept contemplates structured parking only on the high density residential. All the rest is parked at city required parking on surface parks. Tbat's the general configuration for a product like this. I think as the users come forward, Bahram talked about this being driven by the marketplace. As those users come forward, as those pieces get put together I think that could be an option but right now it's contemplated that those would be all surface parks. Councilman Campion: Okay. Darren Lazan: Another thing I'd add to Councilwoman Ryan's comment or question as well I think the photos and the architecture are the vision. That's what is driving the design of this center. The purpose of this site plan it's very basic site plan is to start generating the numbers to inform the AUAR so we can get that feedback back and start to work through those site plans again so really if you look at the project it's really Bahram's vision and not architecture that's driving the development site moving forward. Bahram Akradi: The most what we think is going to happen is we'll be able to develop the whole site. Put the connection to Bluff Creek and really first focus on getting the perimeter finished or get started and then the middle is going to find it's path and we'll be back in front of you with different designs but the parking once again like when I designed you know Life Time to go in we need X number of parking for our use. So typical cities maybe ask for 5 per 1,000. We actually need 6 per 1,000 so we over park over the city requirements in most places. For our kEll Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 use. Different users based on their, you know their traffic they need to kind of think through. A smart retailer knows how much parking they need based on the size of their boxes so the challenge there is obviously you don't want to over park because it becomes like a sea of parking and not friendly. And then you can't under park because then you kill the businesses so that just becomes the balance of having to work it in a piece by piece, detail by detail. Does that make sense? Councilman Campion: Yeah. Bahram Akradi: We will be, you know we will be working with you guys through the codes and making sure it's the right balance of that. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Councilwoman Tjornhom I think you had a couple questions. Councilwoman Tjornhom: I think I have some comments and some questions or maybe. Mayor Laufenburger: Either are allowed. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Yep. You know I actually am relieved this is at this point right now because I think that this has been kind of a missing piece of the puzzle for this community for a while. It's always kind of been in limbo. Never quite sure what direction it was going. What was going to actually be developed or the type of tone it would take if it was developed so I think that this is good for our community. I just, I want to make sure it's the right fit and you know we talk about retail space and competing for it and tenants and that brings me back to our downtown and as a council member that's always been on my radar that this has to be something that compliments us and it doesn't compete with what our community's already built and one of those things I feel strongly about is the type of uses for this development and one of those uses that's always hanging out there that everyone that's come through has always said that if they don't get it this development won't work or this project won't work is a grocery store and I'm not sure if it's too soon to talk about that but that's one of my concerns is to know what some of those uses are going to be because we've always felt that the core of our downtown to bring people down for the everyday uses, the grocery stores and those type of retail establishments keep our downtown healthy and so if someone could address that. Bahram Akradi: So I think that's a great point because it's the one that everybody has brought in and I met the Mayor long before I had any interest in this project and we talked about downtown. I had nothing to do with it. I had no interest in doing anything with it. I had just heard about it from Scott and then you know I met the Mayor and he just was appointed and wanted to meet with me and elected Life Time. So here's what I would say to you. My point of view is that we need to be proactive about downtown offensively not defensively. Downtown needs to, you know the City needs to do everything they can, and I've committed that I will be willing, ready and able to help with development downtown. If we want downtown to be a pedestrian like downtown, if you have a vision like Excelsior or St. Louis Park or anything that is more, it is not 35 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 going to work. I hate to be so blunt about it but I'm going to for clarity. It is not going to work in the current form you have right now. Right now you have 3 huge big box users. One story. Target, Cub Food and Byerly's. Those developments are fast, they're the type of developments that somebody needs to drive in and drive out. I'm not going to walk to Byerly's. I'm not going to walk to Cub Food. I'm not going to walk to Target so if some day some of those developments, I don't know which one and market will define it itself, would be able to be redeveloped so you could actually build shops, apartments on top. Make some of those developments become 4-5 stories. Build the connection. It needs a master development plan to how gradually make this thing kind of evolve to something that is more urban looking for that. Now if I come back at it from the other direction is I think you know a lot of emphasis has been put on grocery store so let me tell you from the development standpoint why grocery stores are so important. If you look at anybody trying to sell a shopping center they're touting grocery anchored number one. Or they say it's shadow grocery anchor so basically it means they're adjacent to another shopping mall that has grocery store. That is a big factor for all the other retailers that would be complimentary that we don't have downtown. Would have an interest to come out there. Their interest would dramatically drop if you don't have a major anchor that drives everyday traffic so that's why people want the grocery. That's why we need to have that. It's the right. Now let's get the other direction. Let's say we don't allow a grocery store go in this intersection. A mile out away from this on 212 you're out of Chanhassen and there is no way you can stop somebody going from, if they can't go here they want everything the same thing the way I would approach it at Life Time. If the City didn't want me here I go as close as I could go to be outside of that jurisdiction and get myself in. I don't really believe we should approach, and again I say we because I want to do this with you guys. Not against the City. Not in a confrontation with the City. I just I really have so much to do. We're doing 1 �/2 million square feet of development. I'm personally leading at Life Time over the next 3 years so I'm so busy. I don't want to do this unless we're doing it friendly, lovingly, in partnership with the City. We're fully committed to you but I don't believe the project is as viable. I don't want to tell it can't get done. I just don't think it's as viable without a large format grocery store. But that's the way every developer would want that to develop something like this but that's the reason we want that and I don't think you can stop it so points I wanted to reiterate. If we don't put it in here they go a mile away and they're going to, if they want to compete they're going to compete. We live in a country that it's all about free competition you know and the best player shall win so that's the way it works. And finally I mean even you know we had for a period of time Cub Food was viewing this site as an additional site to their downtown location. They weren't necessarily saying this is going to compete so much that we can't do business over there and at the end of the day I'm not sure that if one of those grocery stores changes we wouldn't be able to achieve a better direction for the City and what we really want to accomplish downtown. It might be actually our opportunity to build more high density uses in downtown to make that connection for pedestrian connection. Does that help? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Yeah, thank you. Bahram Akradi: Thank you. tr" Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Bethany anything else? Councilwoman Tjomhom: No that's it. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. McDonald did you have any comments or questions at this time? Darren I just wanted, there's a couple things I just want to discuss. There's 3 primary entrances into the property. Powers Boulevard and then is it Sunrise? Is that the one on the north? Sunrise Court. Darren Lazan: I think that's Millner. Kate Aanenson: It's Sunset. Darren Lazan: Sunset okay. Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah Sunset. Then on the west would be Bluff Creek. Possibly one on Mills. Darren Lazan: That's the Mills. Mayor Laufenburger: So you see, you don't see a complication with those 3 entrances at this time, unless the AUAR comes in and say you need 2 more. Darren Lazan: Mr. Mayor that's absolutely right. We don't preliminarily see any issue. We think there's going to be adequate access off of Lyman, Powers and an interconnect to Bluff Creek that will serve the neighborhood to the southwest but absolutely right. That's the purpose of the AUAR is to run through our numbers. Compare those to the traffic studies and the regional work that's been done previously and make sure that we can adequately serve the site so we will be reviewing that through the AUAR. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Now you're identifying office structure on the north, northeast and the northeast area and you're also identifying housing, let's call it senior housing and then multi- family housing. Do you have in mind a number of families that you want living on your 120 acre property? Do you have a number in mind? Darren Lazan: That's great. Great question. We have roughly between 20 and 40 units in the medium density. Roughly 300 in the high density market rate product and another 140 seems to be the market for the senior. Mayor Laufenburger: So that sounds like about 600, is that about right? 37 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 Darren Lazan: So you can extrapolate that and that's a ballpark guess. Obviously as those plans get solidified and the numbers will move around a little bit, that's what we're counting on right now. I think maybe it's important also to discuss the reason we did the comparison to the other centers is to show we're smaller in both footprint and in the square footage is to kind of illustrate the need to have the perfect mix of uses so that we have the right families in the housing product to support the night time and morning uses. We have the right office users to support the lunch time crowd for those restaurants and we really create that synergy that's necessary so that's where for us as a development team that's where the uses become so critical because we don't have the luxury of a million square feet where we can cycle tenants through there. This is a smaller boutique regional play and we need to have the best possible players and the most energy from morning til night. Mayor Laufenburger: So 600 people, that's going to be probably, or excuse me 600 families. That's probably going to be 1,200 to 1,500 people of all ages probably. Darren Lazan: Sure. Mayor Laufenburger: Maybe a little bit less than that. Darren Lazan: Maybe a little. Apartments tend to be 1 point something. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay talk about the offices up on the north. How many people do you see that you would need to put in those offices in order to support some of the, like the lunch times and stuff like that? Darren Lazan: So those are, right now they're shown contemplated to be a medical office use so that's kind of a hybrid between an office and kind of a retail where you'll have that turnover all day long as folks come through to the medical office users so that's that employee base that you would see in an employer but also those trips in the patients and so forth that come through. There's really 150,000 square feet of that product right there so it depends how that space broke out but there are thousands of trips per day that will come through that between the employees and the folks that are visiting those clinics. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. You showed a market opportunity of 700 million and you said that that would warrant about a million one square feet. Yet your building 600,000 square feet. Are you missing out on a market opportunity? Darren Lazan: So that's a great question again too. I think it's important from a development's perspective that we not start out at market capacity. It puts us at a disadvantage. Nobody knows what the long term play is for that retail. I think Babram walked through some of the concerns and of the retail and the character going forward as that happens so as a development team we felt like it was important to get a better mix of uses that could support probably a smaller square footage of users successfully and make sure they're vibrant and viable. IF Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Let's see. I think at this time what I'd like to do is offer the council an opportunity to speak to things that you would like to see in the development. Okay in other words let's try to provide some guidance and I would like you to, I think I'd also like you to speak to are you in favor of in opposition to or neutral about that grocery anchor. I think I'd like to hear that as well. Okay who would like to start? Anybody? Mr. Campion. Councilman Campion: In general I would say that I'm in favor of the concept of a grocery anchor seeing it as still a compliment to downtown and again if it's not built there it will be you know just around the corner in Chaska or Eden Prairie or wherever. Things that I would like to see in the development would be more of the unique small shops that I'm thinking of in the center of the village. Things like you know coffee shops. Like you know a small microbrewery, tap room, something like that would be nice. But just variety. A variety of unique shops. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, anything else? Councilman Campion: Other things to note is just I know I've beard a fair amount, as I know the other, my fellow council members have about traffic concerns and flow in and out of the neighborhood on Bluff Creek Boulevard there and just to pay special attention to that and I know that there's a lot of development and planning yet to be done but just to keep that as a primary concern. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Anybody else want to offer some comments or suggestions? Councilwoman Ryan: I will Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilwoman Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: You know thanks for putting this forward again. I'm very excited about the potential. You know one thought that I have is we keep coming back to that this is a regional mall or regional lifestyle center but it is in Chanhassen and it affects the people of Chanhassen, specifically the ones that neighbor this and have been used to having you know a grassy knoll full of pumpkins in the fall so I just want to be very sensitive to that piece of it. In terms of specific uses I would like similar to what Councilman Campion said, you know something a little more specialized. You know we aren't Excelsior but the way Excelsior has approached their downtown with making it unique to Excelsior is something that is appealing to a lot of the folks in Chanhassen that I've heard from. I am not opposed to a grocery store and so I have, I don't have any issues with that. I support downtown. I grocery shop in downtown and would remain loyal to downtown but I don't have any opposition to having a grocer out in this space. I just and again I'm going to save some of my comments in terms of some of the environmental impacts when we get to the AUAR because that is a concern of mine. I just when you think of being a visionary you know you talk about sustainability and the materials, you know be unique. You know you've done a great job with Life Time and the way that you've rolled out the various kt Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 concepts and have continued to evolve that organization. I'd like to see that same vision applied to this project because I think there is a lot of opportunity to embrace some of the environmental issues that you're faced with. I would like to utilize them versus have them go away and so when you talk about shops and stores I'd rather not see fast foods. Something for families. Something that screams community. All the signs say we're a community of life and I think the Mayor was bringing up good questions in terms of ages and numbers of people and families. I mean I hope that is what this is the lifestyle and a way of life for Chanhassen and just as you go through this planning process to think of the future and keep the folks of the city very involved and engaged. Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Councilwoman Ryan. Anybody else comments? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilwoman Tjornhom. Councilwoman Tjornhom: I think one phrase I heard was walking around Vail. Is that what I heard someone mention? Did you mention that it would be like walking around Vail? Bahram Akradi: 'That's what I want it to be like. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Yes. That is what I would like you to build too. Mayor Laufenburger: We need mountains. We need mountains for that. Darren Lazan: That's the grading that has to come in. Councilwoman Tjornhom: That's the environmental impact study. And so you know I think that's wonderful. You know we all have our concept of what that would be like and that is a vision and what we're all talking about now are visions but in reality when we talk about, you know I've heard the phrase for a long time it was coined a lifestyle center and it was, I don't know what some of the other acronyms were used but I always thought, I never bought that because let's just be honest. These shops or businesses or establishments that will be at this lifestyle center or Avienda, it's going to be market driven so we can request a tap room. We can request a bistro. We can request whatever we want but in the end it's really going to be market driven and who wants to come to Avienda and start a business or maintain a business and so that is still to be seen. I am totally against a grocery store for many reasons. For one I think the argument that was presented was that you know for a retail establishment to succeed it needs a grocery store to be an anchor or around it. Well that same argument then pertains to our downtown. In order for our downtown to be successful we need to have those stores here and as it's council it's not our job once again I've always said to distinguish what businesses should be here and what shouldn't be here but from the very start of this whole process one of the uses that was excluded has always been a grocery store and I think changing the rules right now at this CIC Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 point is, I don't know it's kind of unfair to everybody else who tried to give it a shot to come in and develop this property and so I will be against it for I don't know how anyone can ever change my mind because I know our downtown business council at that time was against it and while it's not our job, once again like I said to dictate who's here and who's not here, I just think it's only fair if council plays by the rules it's been playing with for quite a while. And I think with that I too would hope that we can work together and that it can be a pleasant process and one that we all enjoy and we can work together as a developer and a council and a community and do something that we're proud of. So that's it. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Councilwoman Tjornhom. Mr. McDonald do you have any comments you'd like to share? Councilman McDonald: Sure I'll share some comments. You have to excuse me I've got a cold so it's difficult to talk tonight but I've kind of been involved with this thing for as long as I've been on council, going back to 2008 or 2006 when I was on the Planning Commission. It's always lacked vision and I say that because no one ever wanted to put anything down on paper to give us an idea of what could be. You made a good start I think that it is going to be totally market driven. You know it's nice to put the little boxes up there but you've got to fill them in so I understand what that is like and there's a lot of wants within a community as to what people would like to see in there but again it all comes down to the market and what you can talk to come in because every business will want to be successful. They don't want to be one of your businesses that rotates in and out so that part of the vision and design is totally up to you all. I am open to whatever businesses you want to bring in. I mean they'll come back here. We'll have to evaluate and talk about it but yes, whatever it would take to make this successful I would be more than willing to listen to the arguments of why this particular store in this particular area. So I think the best thing I can say is at least I'm encouraged. It looks as though finally a team's been put together that has some idea about the land and maybe a vision to share with what could be so I look forward to that. Thanks. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. McDonald. Darren let me just offer a few things. First of all to you and the entire team you've, the manner in which you've come forward as contrasting March of 2015 I think all of the council would agree that is a marked improvement so that's one of the reasons why you have cooperation from city staff and I see no reason why that won't continue and I wish all of you best of luck. I would also ask Mr. Akradi to extend our sincere good wishes to Mark Zappes and hopefully his health returns very, very soon. It'd be fun to see him back on this project. Let's see I also think there is no question in any of our minds I believe that what you build will be aesthetically beautiful and it will be timeless and it will be, it will be something that the community and the region will want to go to. I do agree with Mr. McDonald that the market demands will dictate who gets in there and I can assure you that you're going to be turning over those tenants just like the downtown turns over tenants and Eden Prairie Center turns over tenants. I mean in 1974 I called on Eden Prairie Center when Sears was like holy cow, Sears is coming to Eden Prairie. And now it's like so what you know. Sorry Sears. But things change and I think that anything that we attempt to do to shackle you from responding to 41 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 the market demand I think that perhaps over steps our role. I will say this though, I would agree with Councilwoman Ryan, I don't want to see fast food there. I want to see some nice restaurants. I want to see some restaurants so that when people think about let's go out to dinner on Friday night dear, they don't go Wildfire, Biaggio, Redstone, those. They go hey, let's go to Avienda. There's 3 chances we can, or 4 or 5 chances that we can find something that we would like. I'd like to see a jewelry store there. Not because I want to buy any jewelry but we've got families that are coming here and we've got kids that are graduating high school and they're thinking about buying rings for their sweeties in the next 3 or 4 years. Let's put a jewelry store down there. Audience: Wedding Day? Mayor Laufenburger: Market the man. Market the man. I think it's important that we as a council and a community recognize that we are competing with other communities. This regional, and I agree with Councilwoman Tjornhom. I don't know that it's a lifestyle center. You know people live their lifestyle some with jeans and a sweatshirt. Some with a tuxedo. If you make something attractive and if you make something that people want to be part of, whether it's walking. Whether it's lights on at night when the snow comes down. Somebody has a romantic stroll on their way to a restaurant. If it's done nicely people will want to be there if you have a tenant mix that responds to the market demand. This council has made decisions in the past based on letting the market decide who the winners are and I think that's an appropriate action for us to consider in the future. Let's see is the wetland part of the AUAR Kate? Kate Aanenson: Yeah. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so then I'll reserve that. I do want to say this though, you've got to make sure that this is public friendly. I want it to be a destination not just because of the retail space or the hotel or the whatever anchors you have. I want it to be an attractive place where people want to go and they may not want to spend any money but they just want to be there and hang out and watch people and enjoy that sunset at 4:30 on a Thanksgiving evening and I think that's the best. That's the sum total of comments. Staff is there anything you want to add to Mr. Lazan? Kate Aanenson: No. I would just say we'd take these comments with the Planning Commission and make that part of the record for their direction. Mayor Laufenburger: That would be fine. That would be fine. Thank you. Mr. Akradi? Bahram Akradi: Yeah I'd like to give you guys some comments back. First of all I want to thank you all for your comments and I want to assure all of you that I heard you and yes, I am going to reject fat checks from food companies I don't, I can't tolerate what they do with their food or what they have in their food. Preservative, et cetera. We're committed to you to build a beautiful development that we will be far exceeding from what the City's codes are for EN Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 landscaping. My desire with the team is to use beautiful grasses. Beautiful landscaping. Beautiful sidewalks. Pavers in the development. I want to make it really, really beautiful. The more beautiful we make this development the more attractive it becomes. I can set the tone as a developer of the 100 acres and then I have to work on the Feng Shui. I have to make sure that it feels good. It feels healthy. The geometry of the place is right and it all wants to work. So there's been a couple mentions about the lifestyle centers so I mean that term could be used in all different kinds of ways and it finally means nothing to a lot of people but at least for me my definition is a place that makes people want to come and hang out just like you guys asked for. For more than just shopping. They come. They spend time and then while they're spending time they may shop. They may see a movie. They may do different things so we, I hugely appreciate your support. I appreciate your comments about the market driven. We have to respond to that. There's no way I can develop this without responding to the market but we will set the tone as you've asked. It will be healthy looking, feeling. It will be class act. It will be first class from every element that we demand from all the retailers. We will push the project as far as we can push it. As far in terms of the quality that we demand from everybody coming in that the market can allow. It will be top end of what the market would allow before I start losing people because they wouldn't want to spend that kind of money going to this type of demographic or market. But I think as a beautiful market. I am super excited to work on this and I've heard you guys. We'll work on everything that you have mentioned. We will be back in front of you with more detailed plans and I really appreciate what you guys have done today. Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. Akradi. Ms. Aanenson is there anything else we need to do for item number one at this time? Kate Aanenson: No. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright let's move to item number 2 which is the resolution ordering the update of the AUAR. APPROVE RESOLUTION ORDERING REVIEW FOR UPDATE TO THE 2005 AUAR. Mayor Laufenburger: Do you have a staff report Ms. Aanenson? Kate Aanenson: Yeah I just have a brief one. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Kate Aanenson: Just again the goal here then would be to order that AUAR update and in addition to that you're approving a resolution for that with the professional service agreement for the two consultants that are involved in the project. So again just for everybody that's tracking this project, the concept PUD with the resolution would allow that to go forward so the AUAR is a hypothetical development scenario which is again where we got caught up in the illustrative 43 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 drawings in those. We know that's going to change. That's going to give you the threshold and if you look through the consultants contract, Hoisington-Koegler's you can see that they've, they're going to look at two development alternatives so you're looking at what the maximum threshold would be and if you think about that with Total Wine when things moved and changed we said that as long as we didn't exceed those thresholds for traffic there was flexibility within that so this would be the same sort of thing here again. The PUD we're going to look at, we will put together specific uses. There will be some things you don't want in there. We talked about that maybe tonight and those will evolve as we look at that but there'll be a development scenario. The reason it has to be updated is because this was done, as Darren pointed out in his presentation too in 2003 this was low density and then in the Comprehensive Plan in 2008 it was changed to the office or regional commercial so it's updated. There's numerous reasons why it's being updated. That would be the one, there's been a change and it's been over 5 years since this was looked at so for those reasons alone it needs to be updated. So with this approval tonight we've also included the two professional consultant contracts. Hoisington-Koegler and then also Kimley-Horn who both worked on the previous project and we had recommended those two last year too so there's a professional service agreement for both consultants in your packet along with a resolution. Again the City is the regulatory unit of government so we will be holding those hearings. If you look in the proposal from Hoisington-Koegler there will be workshops with city staff and the council and commission. There will also be a workshop or a neighborhood so we will also be meeting with the public in the area too. That will give them an opportunity to look at the numbers. Look at the impacts. Obviously the wetland is a big, one of the biggest concerns. I know that was raised at the neighborhood, I mean at the public hearing at the Planning Commission. There was concerns about that impact as members of the staff have too. They understand that's a big issue and we'll be working through all the requirements for that to go forward. So with that we are recommending this motion and that would be approve the resolution ordering the update. In addition to that you'd be approving the professional services agreement so the process is outlined. There's a timeline included in your packet. It pretty much mirrors what Darren had showed you on their timeline and that's what we recommending for your motion tonight so I'd be happy to answer any questions you may have on the process itself. Mayor Laufenburger: Kate could you just, before I ask the council for any questions, can you just clarify. I think it was May 9, 2015 we ordered an AUAR for the previous developer. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: ...following that closely. What's the reason why that didn't go forward at that time? Do you know? Kate Aanenson: The developer chose not to pursue the. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, so that wasn't a City decision not moving forward. 0 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 Kate Aanenson: No. The City executed the contracts. The developer never, I mean the consultant never chose to do it. Mayor Laufenburger: So it was never consummated between the developer and the AUAR contractor? Kate Aanenson: Correct and to be clear on this, they'll be giving us the escrow. The developer has to give the City escrow so we will manage those contracts and anything that's, it's not usual we go back to the developer. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Alright. Let's do this. Questions of staff on the AUAR. And I, actually let's just say we may also ask a question of the applicant. Darren is there something you would like to say to us regarding the AUAR before we go with our questions? Darren Lazan: Well I think Mr. Mayor, thank you for that opportunity and I do want to take a quick second. You made some very gracious comments about our team and I didn't get a chance that it's been a pleasure re -starting this project and working with your team. Great group of people. We've worked through dozens of details below the surface that you folks don't get bothered with at this level but it's been a great team. Great people to work with and we look forward to continuing that as we move forward. The AUAR is just one component of that. This is a study. There's no pitch. No approval tonight for this. We're simply asking you to order the study so we can get that information back again. 'Those environmental components, some are simpler. Traffic is pretty well studied. We look at picking up those comments and incorporating those. Carrying those trips from Powers through to the neighborhood. Those components are pretty straight forward. Some not so straight forward like the wetland component and we look forward to addressing that. We have a first class team that's worked on assessing existing wetlands. Looking at options going forward of how they can be preserved. If they're not preserved how can they be recreated elsewhere. We look forward to getting the information from the AUAR. Turning around and presenting that in detail back to you again so we're excited to get this started and get this feedback back in a timely fashion so we can incorporate all of that into our next application. Kate Aanenson: If I could just piggyback on what Darren said. So we've been meeting with Hoisington-Koegler Group just to make sure everybody's on the same page understanding what we're trying to scope and the timelines and so there's been a couple of meetings on that already. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. I was going to ask you a question, opening question but you may have answered it but I'm going to ask the question anyway and if you choose to answer it differently. So what does the AUAR provide to you Darren? What does the AUAR bring that you need? Darren Lazan: So the AUAR is your guiding document so rather than us taking a shot at traffic, just pick one out. Coming in here and telling you hey this is, we propose 4 lanes in and we think 45 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 that's sufficient and then you needing to study it and come back and say no, we need 6 lanes. This gives us that guiding feedback on all of those environmental components so we look forward to getting on the same page with the community on all of those. The air, noise, the light, the sewer, water, the street work and the environmental wetlands culture resource. All of those components getting on the same page as the community so we can bring forward a project that is better in sync. Mayor Laufenburger: So the AUAR gives you very specific side rails if you will on what you have to answer. Darren Lazan: That's a great assessment, yep. Gives us some boundaries. Mayor Laufenburger: So is there ever a situation where you are not able to respond or not able to comply with what an AUAR requests? Darren Lazan: So the AUAR is, updates especially are usually approached in a very methodical manner. It looks at the original component. Says what's changed and what further mitigation needs to take place. If that mitigation comes back with something that can't be met we would be looking at proposing something that meets the intent. I think the comment about intent was made earlier. That meets that intent or otherwise addresses but generally the AUAR document comes back with feedback that we can work with and propose something that meets the intent of the AUAR. Mayor Laufenburger: And it's quite possible Darren, and I'm asking this of you Kate too, it's quite possible that what you come back with something intending to satisfy the needs of the AUAR. Is it possible the City Council may not have authority in order to grant the approval of that intent? Kate maybe that's to you. Darren Lazan: It's probably both, I'm sorry go ahead. Kate Aanenson: Well I was going to say you know the wetland would be one. I think there's dual jurisdiction on that. The City would still be the LGU and so is the Army Corps so there's some things on that but to Darren's point I think a lot of it is just acceptable mitigation that both parties have to agree to and another jurisdiction. I do want to add too that as part of this dialogue that we've been having prior to being here they've brought in another group. One of the main concerns we had is walkability with not only speed but volume of traffic so they're working with the Toole Group. Fantastic and that's their bailiwick is traffic calming. They work all over the United States so we're excited to see kind of what suggestions they have to make this a really great project so that's a great firm so I think we all have the same goal. We're moving in that direction so what it's going to do as Darren stated is answer a lot of questions that the residents have. You know how can we mitigate these things and come up with suggestions of mitigation so it will be a good process. 46 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Thanks for that opening. Now let's turn it over to council. Any questions or comments you have about granting this AUAR? Anybody? Mr. McDonald I know you're a little sick so okay. Let me move down here. Councilwoman Ryan, go ahead. Councilwoman Ryan: Sure thank you Mr. Mayor. You answered my questions. I don't have any questions just my comment would be as much as I care about no fast foods or I'm okay with a grocery store, my biggest hurdle right now is going to be what comes out of the environmental impact study. Specifically the traffic impacts. I'm very concerned about the traffic going into, along Bluff Creek into the neighborhoods. The conversations about Mill Street. So traffic for sure. Grading. Getting a better understanding on grading of that parcel and then of course as I mentioned probably about 10 times the impact to the wetlands so I actually do, that spurred a question Kate. So when through the AUAR then do you also get feedback from the different jurisdictions? Do they give their input as well? Kate Aanenson: Yeah. I think that's the other nice thing about so that will go out for what we say is jurisdictional review so everybody will comment on that back and you'll be able to see all those comments and then we also respond to those comments so, and that will also be all public transparent and the residents can see those too and make sure that we've adequately addressed them. Darren Lazan: Yeah I think the nice thing about the AUAR process it is as it says, it's an alternative areawide review is it's very much in keeping with Bahram's mission for this project to work on this with you as a community and the AUAR process we work together to scope the extent of the study. We set that. We participate in getting you the information you need. Your consultants then analyze it. Get it back to us. We work through that so yeah there's all around of reviewers comment on that so we get everybody's feedback and then at the same time we're paralleling our wetland application and process as well so we're getting Corps of Engineers. BWSR. Everybody else along the way so all those agencies are very much involved. Kate Aanenson: And again ultimately you're going to approve it. Councilwoman Ryan: Right, right. Kate Aanenson: So you have to agree to all that so. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. I just want to emphasize how important this piece of it is from my perspective to the entirety of this project so it will be something that will be really looking at closely. Darren Lazan: Very much understood. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor and council. 47 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Gerhardt. Todd Gerhardt: I'd just like to add, when they evaluate the environmental area they look at it not just from the development standpoint but even after the development. The site is definitely going to be graded and that grading and the development that occurs is it going to enhance the features in that area or are they going to degrade the features so we had discussions with the consultant and they said they're going to go in depth in that analysis and so we don't move ahead and try to save something that ultimately will be degraded because of the development too so in some cases it may even be better to look at improving it elsewhere. Councilwoman Ryan: So for instance when that, I think on one of the photos it said the wetland went away. Do they talk about not, you know those type of features as well? That it was emptied or wasn't. Darren Lazan: So oh one of our wetlands? Councilwoman Ryan: Yes. Darren Lazan: Sure we have really every possible category of wetland on this project so the one that went away was a permitted drain of that wetland by the previous owner of the property who got approval from the Corps to drain that, or from the watershed I guess to drain that component. He did so. It substantially reduced it's footprint and now we have gone back out just this fall and re -mapped what's left today and it's a small portion and we've included that. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Darren Lazan: So the one that went away was drained by a permit and it's not, really the, you know we have components on the north side that were filled with the roadway project and now what remains is substantially less than what was there prior to the roadway project. We have the piece you're talking about. We have several farmed wetlands that are marginal. We have some in the bluff that are probably a little higher quality and we have big Wetlands 1 and 2 right in the middle of the site that are of concern and again I didn't want to drag the whole down on the discussion tonight but we're been working on these wetlands this permit for, actively for 2-3 months and last year as well and those primary and secondary impacts are critical to the analysis and obviously we're showing a site plan that shows those filled because we believe those secondary impacts would prevent them from being quality wetlands. So we've again this fall sent out the team back out again to reassess the quality. It's called a MnRAM. It's assessment of the quality of the wetlands. Reassess those just this fall before it froze so we had the most current information and we're pouring all that in and we look forward to putting that whole package together. A complete thought as was mentioned earlier on how we address those environmental issues. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay, thank you. 48 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Anybody else concerning the AUAR? Would someone like to make a motion? Councilwoman Ryan: I'll make a motion Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilwoman Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: I'd like to make the motion that the Chanhassen City Council adopts the resolution ordering the update to the Alternative Urban Areawide Review for the 2005 MUSA area and approves professional services agreements with Hoisington-Koegler Group and Kimley- Horn and Associates. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright we have a valid motion. Is there a second? Councilman Campion: Second. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. Campion. Any further discussion? Resolution #2016-85: Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the Chanhassen City Council adopts the resolution ordering the update to the Alternative Urban Areawide Review for the 2005 MUSA area and approves professional services agreements with Hoisington-Koegler Group and Kimley-Horn and Associates. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Laufenburger: I would just like to say one thing Darren and Mr. Akradi. I think what you're hearing here is we're excited about what this will bring to the community, especially what it will bring to the community that's not already downtown so that's one of the key factors. Yes you're going to have to make some market decisions but we're excited as is much of the community. And then lastly I would say there are a lot of people that need to hear more about this story of Avienda so you've got Rotary. You've got Lions Club. You've got a number of different organizations. Reach out to them and ask if they would like to hear the story because there are citizens that would like to know more about what this story is so I would encourage that, okay? Alright. With that, that concludes our new business. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Laufenburger: Council presentations this evening. Bahram Akradi: Thank you. Darren Lazan: Thank you. 49 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you very much. Council presentations? I just have one. You maybe were going to say this Mr. Gerhardt. Truth in Taxation. The Truth in Taxation meeting for citizens, the Truth in Taxation where our finance department presents the results of the preliminary property tax levy that we made back in September. That will be presented on Monday night, December 5' here in council chambers and there will be opportunity for people to address the council relative to that information on the P. And then on the 12m is the, December 12'b is when we will actually make the final budget decision and final levy decision. Also I would like to announce that we have an employee who's been with us. Todd Gerhardt: Oh going on 20 years. Mayor Laufenburger: A member of our engineering organization, specifically the individual who does our GIS is retiring on Wednesday, November 30s' and I would like to just make this proclamation that the City of Chanhassen issues a proclamation celebrating Jolene Devens Day Wednesday, November 301 in recognition of your over 20 years of service to the City of Chanhassen. Jolene has been an exceptional employee. She's been the back bone of our GIS for a number of years and I know that Jolene will be sadly missed but we wish her the best of luck and the best of time in her retirement so officially November 30'b, Jolene Devens Day here in Chanhassen. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Laufenburger: Administrative presentations Mr. Gerhardt? Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, City Council members, I had the opportunity, that's why I was gone. I was able to give an update to the Chanhassen Lions. I think I've been with the City for 30 years and I don't think anybody has ever given the Lions an update because it's usually on a City Council night so, and I told Mark that it's about time somebody came over there and gave them an update so thank you for allowing me to miss a portion of the council meeting. They appreciated it. It went on for an hour and so I was trying to get a cough drop out of Jerry but he wouldn't part with any of them but they're very appreciative and you know they do so much for the community from the breakfast. The pancake breakfast with the fire department. They've donated money to the lights out at Lake Ann. Numerous benches and they're working on a lion's head fountain out at Lake Ann that will be entertaining for the kids to stick their head in a lion's mouth to get a drink and, but one of their big events is also the summer picnic for the senior group and as I was presenting they had questions and one of them is what else can we do for the City and I said well I know how much the organizations give back to the community and I said just don't burn your group out. Just stay active in what you're doing. We really appreciate it and you know reach out and be supportive to other organizations in the community so I thanked them on behalf of the council and department heads so it was a good group. Well received. 50 Chanhassen City Council — November 28, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger: Very good. And they also have the Christmas Tree lot right adjacent to Cub Foods. Todd Gerhardt: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: I think they go through about 600 trees a year which is just amazing so if you haven't gotten your tree yet please head over to the Lions Club Christmas Tree lot right there on Market Boulevard. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. None. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay just a reminder that the council will adjourn to executive session in the Fountain Conference Room immediately following the council meeting to consider the City Manager's Annual Evaluation. Is there a motion to adjourn? Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman McDonald seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 9:45 pm. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim 51 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 1, 2016 Vice Chairman Weick called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mark Undestad, John Tietz, Maryam Yusuf, Nancy Madsen, Steve Weick, and Mark Randall MEMBERS ABSENT: Andrew Aller STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; MacKenzie Walters, Planner; and Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer PUBLIC PRESENT: Daniel Fuchs 1862 Colonial Lane, #5 Corey & Lori Hothan 1941 Commonwealth Boulevard, #5 Jeff Franz 8950 Sunset Drive Jon Gilbert 1641 Jeurissen Lane Zhexin Zhang 1455 Bethesda Circle Nicholas Perlman 1812 Commonwealth Boulevard PUBLIC HEARING: AVIENDA-CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR A REGIONAL DESTINATION, LIFESTYLE AND MILD USE CENTER ON FIVE PARCELS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LYMAN AND POWERS BOULEVARDS. THE CONCEPT PLAN INCLUDES RESIDENTIAL. COMMERCIAL. HOTEL AND OFFICE USES. Aanenson: Thank you Chair, members of the Planning Commission. This is a concept PUD so for that reason it's a little different than, as far as we'll be gathering input. You'll be sending a motion up to the council but it's really what you're giving is some considerations and issues that you want them to look at when they review it and I'll go through a little bit more detail in how the concept works but as you stated this item will go to the City Council on November 28th. This item did appear before the Planning Commission and the City Council last year and the reason, at that time it only had 70 acres in it. Now we've got 120 acres. All the parcels shown in red are included in this application. There's actually 5 parcels so a little bit different than what you saw last time and I think that was one of the issues of concern that everybody looked at is there's kind of a missing hole and how would those 2 projects be integrated if they went forward. So Level 7 Development, LLC is still the developer. Some of the parties in the LLC have changed hands but that's the applicant. So the request for the PUD right now is we're considering the concept PUD so again this is a fact finding. The purpose of the PUD is to flush out, be Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 transparent what issues that the City may have. Some concerns or the direction the developer wants to go and before they go and spend additional dollars that we kind of have alignment of goals so part of this will also require an AUAR which is, I'm looking for the transportation. All the environmental features update so the biggest component of that will be the environmental so it's Alternative Urban Areawide Review but really what it does is economic impact and looking at the environmental traffic sort of things so when we get that back then we'll come back for another public hearing before the Planning Commission for the development stage with the preliminary plat and with the development stage there'll be a lot more details and the hard engineering. Quantities of grading. Some of those things are not identified now. Right now it's a concept. We're looking at framework issues so with that with the preliminary plat when it goes to City Council there would be a final stage or final plat. Then in addition to that any development that would go onto any of those parcels would come back to the Planning Commission for a public hearing on the specific designs so any of those uses that were to come in, for example if there was a senior housing project or apartment project or a restaurant that would come in, that would still come back through this group for a public hearing for the approval of that. That it meets the PUD standards. Tbat's what we'd be putting together here is the PUD standard. It'd be that ordinance and then we'll review each of those projects up against that ordinance. So whatever standards we put in there, whether it's parking, landscaping, lighting, architectural design, those will all be measured against that so there'll be a lot of review over the next years if this project was to proceed. So what's required with a PUD? Again it's approximate building locations. Pedestrian roadways. Height and bulk of buildings and we'll go through a little bit more detail in there but I know this is hard to read but this is really anybody that wants to find more information on this can look at the staff report that's available on the City's website. That we have all the properties within the PUD. That was one of the concerns we had before so everybody in that area is part of this PUD and that the concept is to just gather information. Again the public hearing is making recommendations to the City Council so this is an opportunity to get input from the neighborhood too to see what their concerns are and issues that they may have so again concept, very early stages. Again I want to address how we got to this point. When we updated the Comprehensive Plan in 2008 there was a question asked whether or not a lifestyle center was something that was of interest to the community and we asked it in a survey question and there was overwhelming support to look at this area for the potential of a lifestyle center. As a matter of fact the property was given dual guiding and so the property shown here on the map, in this area here is the subject site. So that area was given dual guiding. It was actually given regional commercial or an office park so if looking at this the City Council could look at how that would lay out and then in addition currently zoned agricultural so when you develop a piece of property it has to be consistent with the land use so this is guided regional commercial, which is the application they're going for and within that they have to meet all the standards that are in the regional commercial zoning district and so this is what we put together. When we re -guided the property for that we put together in the Comprehensive Plan what we felt should be the vision for that and that it's a mixed use commercial district with retail, entertainment uses of scale and function that serves a regional market and the applicant will be showing you what they believe is their market. Where they're drawing from. The physical environment emphasizes attractive, comfortable walking experience for the shoppers and visitors Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 and to serve trails and mass transit as well as automobile traffic. So what we stated too is that we believe that this center would have 2 types of major retail anchors and we'll share a little bit more on, they did do a market study. Mr. McCombs, Jim McCombs did and that was completed in 2014 and that was the genesis for a lot of the uses that they were looking at and what they felt could be in there so if you look at entertainment, that could be anywhere from movie theaters. Other activities like that. Department stores. Comparison shopping. Restaurants. Specialty retail. Hotels and residential. So that's what we saw as the mix of uses that would go in there. And also we put in the zoning ordinance, so in the Comprehensive Plan we identified what we saw as the vision for this area so what you're doing now with the neighborhood is refining that vision. Giving us more direction of what that would be through that intent and then with the PUD we put in also how that project would go forward. So this is the proposal that the applicant has brought forward as their concept so again this is different than the first iteration which was the 70 acres so this is now the entire 120 acres. There is one parcel over here that is part of the project but has no density allocated to it yet. As you're aware one of the things that is required under the AUAR is completion of Bluff Creek Boulevard which is this segment right here. That was a requirement when we did the original environmental documents that said that has to be connected to that off ramp coming onto 212 so that's a requirement. I'll let them go through a little bit more detail of the uses. Of the layout itself but suffice to say that we did put in the, in our staff report some recommendations. Kind of beginning dialogue of some of the uses. They've identified some on here. Again they're for illustrative purposes. Some of the uses that they see on there certainly up in this area would be more of the office space. Restaurants. Retail. Retail in the center and then some transitional housing which we've always said that we wanted which would be the transition between the single family lots and then into the commercial and then some senior type housing. Apartments and the like. I received a number of letters from the people in the Pioneer Pass regarding the connection on this street. The fire department that is a priority for the City, that connection. It's a safety issue and I know the residents don't want it. Are concerned about the connection and as they are this connection here. We've been working with the applicant and that's one of the things we'll look at when we do the AUAR to look at traffic calming techniques. They're also bringing on a team that that's their specialty is looking at those sort of situations. Whether it's an additional roundabout or some of those things through design to traffic calming. I would say this situation also came up when we had the off ramp on 212. The people up in Lake Susan were very concerned that people were going to cut through. We didn't have that as an outcome of that so we believe that we can work to make that happen but we feel strongly as did the public safety that that connection needs to be made. So to get an idea of what square footage, the retail study talked about how much square footage could be in the area itself and not to jump around but I'm going to here quickly just jump up. This is what the McCombs study stated. How much could be in there for leasable space so that's a pretty high, 825,000 square feet would be the low up to over a million square feet. This proposal is less than that. I've got it broken down into square footage but it's probably closer to 50 acres of retail so the square footage is significantly less, probably closer to 400,000 so if you were to compare that to what the McCombs study said in the low end, it's still below that threshold so not maximizing what they believe the market can be on that site. Again a lot of this is going to be determined when we get the traffic study back to make sure that that site can 3 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 accommodate that, the peak hours and the turning movements and those sort of things so we'll have more information on that as we move through the process. So again we took what they had as far as development data and tried to put it in in a way that was probably a little bit more for us to understand when they were using beds and totals. Beds in apartments are different than number of dwelling units. How we would calculate them so you can see that. Again hotels is one of the things that we had recommended go into the mixed use and the developer also wants, I know that was a concern for some of the comments we've already received. The last thing I want to talk about is water resources. The wetlands in the area. There is a process that needs to be done to go through this project to talk about how the wetlands will be impacted. How they'll be replaced and that process we're working on right now to make sure that that aligns with going through all the other environmental documents because it's integral to how this project gets laid out and works. At this time I'll see if the Assistant City Engineer has any comments she'd like to make before I make some closing comments. Fauske: Thank you Kate. Kate really covered a lot of the issues that engineering will be looking through first and foremost just going back to the site plan here. This connection of Bluff Creek Boulevard from the existing terminus to Powers Boulevard. We've been having discussions with the applicant as far as the design requirements for that route as well as internal site circulation that the AUAR will take a look at in developing the counts and again just to reiterate the, some of the important connections that take place, not only Bluff Creek Boulevard to Powers Boulevard but providing a connection to the Preserve development here to the west. We currently have 145 single family homes that have one access point to Bluff Creek Boulevard so from a public safety standpoint, as Kate mentioned, we want to see that street connection to occur up here at Mills and then we're also looking at some potential ways to, through the AUAR process in this location to create a sense of space that folks traveling Bluff Creek Boulevard at this point would see that this is a different area. That they're transitioning into a residential to keep the regional center traffic within this area versus continuing to the west. We'll continue to work with the applicant with that. As well we also are requiring an emergency connection to the Camden Ridge development to the south being an emergency access here to, through the wooded area there again as an emergency access route for an existing residential neighborhood. As far as jurisdictional review goes and with regards to the streets we have Lyman Boulevard here to the north which is a county road so we'll have Carver County involved in the process here as well with Powers Boulevard so they'll be involved with the AUAR process in providing their feedback. Particularly when this area went through the AUAR process in 2005 the intersections at Lyman Boulevard were examined at that time where there would be full access points and this one they're showing as a potential signalized intersection was identified as a full intersection versus to the west Carver County had indicated that there would be no other access, full access points until we get over to Audubon so that's kind of how the layout of the street system went, dates back to well previous to 2005 when the original AUAR was compiled. Aanenson: So there's a lot more detail in the staff report and I'd be happy to answer questions but I'm going to turn it over to the applicant after I'd just state that again your goal when you get done here and you open the public hearing is just to listen to comments and we'll add those 4 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 comments, well we'll categorize those when we get the Minutes to put them in by topic and so the City Council can see not only your comments, which I'm hoping you articulate and that the neighbors can also articulate but we just recommend that you give that observation so at this time if it's okay Chair I'd just have the applicant come up before you open the public hearing. Just give me a second to switch up here. Darren Lazan: Sure Mr. Chair and members of the commission, my name is Darren Lazan. I'm with Landform Professional Services and I represent Level 7 Development. The developer and applicant on the item before you tonight. Appreciate the time. It's good to be back here again as some of you were here a year or so ago when we were here the last time. There's been a handful of changes since then. Kate hit on those. I thought I'd go over those very briefly but I do want to add that it's again a pleasure to work in Chanhassen. You have a tremendous staff to work with. We've had a number of meetings over the even the refresh of this project over the last couple months and it's always a pleasure to work. They do a great job. So Avienda. New name for the project. Pronounced Avienda. There have been some questions on the Facebook page about that. The translation or the definition is a name meaning beautiful and full of energy. Avienda having high energy levels and possessing a high sense of awareness in addition to discerning and inspiring qualities so that's where that name comes from. It was actually developed by the owner. One of the owner Bahram Akradi you may know is the owner of Lifetime Fitness is the ownership representation for this project so there's a number of folks including the folks that owned the 40 acre parcel previously. They're now in the new ownership group. Tbat's what gives us the ability to bring this entire project into one application but Bahram will act as the owner's rep throughout this process and be that central component for us. Real estate is done, is handled by Colliers International. Tom Palmquist is the broker so he provides our insight on real estate. And again with a market driven solution it's great to have Tom on the team to help us work through the best users and the best mix of users. That's his specialty. Does it all over the place so we're happy to have him on the team. Jeff Hysjulien is with RSP Architects. He's here tonight. I'm going to ask him to come up in a bit to walk through some of the design components. RSP extensive experience in these types of projects. I've worked with him for over 10 years I believe on very similar projects so long history with them. They do great work. And Landform will provide the engineering, planning, some landscape architecture and the development management or the entitlement management working through the approval process so you'll see a lot of me through here so that's kind of the core team. We have certainly folks behind that as well that contribute a ton to this project. Won't spend a lot of time on this but this is essentially the location of the project and some of the surrounding major components. We have relationship to the north with downtown Chanhassen. Pretty close adjacency to the two high schools. The Arboretum. Some undeveloped parcels immediately around us which are growing communities with need of services. And I recently added Paisley Park actually as an attraction on there. I thought that was kind of fun to add a bullet since the last time we were here but obviously you know where these positions are but this is something we use in the marketplace to kind of explain where we're situated and what the big components around us are. I really just have 3 slides on the market study. I don't want to bore you to death with that. I'd be glad to answer questions but I think it's important to note that the 61 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 market study was done, as Kate mentioned McCombs did it originally for the City I believe. Did an update for the City. Did an update for Level 7 so they've really been along for the ride the entire way on this parcel. The primary component to share with you tonight is this market area, trade area that they've defined which really reinforces the fact that this is a regional play or regional project. Situated in that southwest comer of the metro we certainly will draw from not only Chan but the surrounding communities but you can see the market or the trade area that's looking to be served by this property extends considerably west down to 212 and 19 corridors there. Tremendous regional component for the project and we understand that through our marketing. Very brief breakdown of that trade area defines some market opportunity. What can the market support? Nobody wants to go in and over build and have empty buildings so we look very hard at what can be built and the McCombs study breaks that down in dollars and millions of dollars a year in trade area. Opportunity. Those are dollars that are leaving the Chanhassen area as well as not being captured by surrounding communities. 430 million in shopping. You can see the breakdown in convenience. Other retail is all the rest and then other services. There's a retail opportunity of about $700 million dollars or a very rough translation and you saw it in more detail of a little over a million square feet of retail. Avienda is looking to propose, and I've combined these kind of a worst case scenario there. Roughly 600,000 square feet so even if you took all of our commercial, called it retail at fully built out as retail we're really only looking at about a 60 percent buildout of what the market studies have shown. I think that's important because (a), the size of the project helps define and shape the size of the project but (b), helps us understand that were not over building in the market. That we can have a very vibrant center that's successful. Has foot traffic. Has car traffic. Has trips in and out and has shopping going on that helps keep that viable and vibrant so we are looking at proposing roughly 60 percent. A little less than 60 percent of what the market could otherwise support. Kate walked through most of this. We are dual guided commercial and office so we are proposing under that regional commercial avenue and then we are currently zoned agricultural as Kate walked through that as kind of a holding district until it develops so we'd be looking to change that zoning through our approval process. Some goods and services examples from the 2030 comp plan calls on this site for entertainment, department store, comparison shopping, specialty retail, boutique restaurant, hotels and some residential. This was focused on the goods and services but it has those components. So we looked at the land area for the project and discovered early on that it was part of an original AUAR or the environmental review for this area and you can see in the upper left hand corner there was some thought going in before any of this area developed. The white border is the overall AUAR border. The red our project border. You can see there's a fair amount of thought that actually had some commercial office components in the southwest area of the study that we now know is all developed as residential so really it makes sense to look, as they did in years after this original study, to move that regional commercial piece up on the highway exit. Up on Lyman and Powers where it likely belongs so there were some studies along the way. These were done by the City in preparation for a potential AUAR update. Now this update did not occur so these are not adopted or completely approved concepts but it was done as part of that study in looking at this comer and the only thing really I bring this up today is to kind of share the mix of uses that were contemplated. You can see the east/west connector and to a certain extent a north/south connector up to Lyman but it contemplated a mix of that 0 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 regional commercial office, high density residential. Medium density residential. Conservation. A lot of those same components as in our proposal so these are 3 different scenarios looked at ahead of that potential 2012 update but we used it to inform our work, and this was our plan with those same uses and colors overlaid. So we used it to inform our work on this piece as to where these uses could fall. What uses would be comprised in a regional center and we have, is there a laser pointer on this one? Oh yes. It doesn't work on a TV. Oh it does work on a TV. How about that. So as Kate, well that was the end of that battery. Alright. So there's, as pointed out earlier by staff there's an east/west connection of Bluff Creek Boulevard to the existing stubbed road on the far west side. We did a, we went with a loop road to better serve our internal users. That's Avienda Parkway as it's currently proposed around the outside of the center, and we made another north/south connection back up to Lyman on that side as contemplated in the designated location for the full intersection. In this plan the retail and commercial uses are focused predominantly in the center. This would be the lifestyle component. We'll talk about that in a little bit some more and in the southeast most adjacent to the exit ramp, the highest volume anticipated, traffic coming in from that point so we located a lot of the retail, heavy retail uses along there. The north side along Lyman is predominantly office or medical office. We transition between those commercial uses with some residential uses so on the far west side we have some medium density residential against the single family and between the commercial and the protected area we have some high density product, either market rate apartment or senior related product on that south side. These again it's important to note, I think it was mentioned earlier, this is purely illustrative. These are schematic layouts. We really have no committed specific users. We're really trying to balance these uses to give you and the community a world class project so these are the components that we think feed on each other and create that vibrancy. Create that sustainability. Having medical office or office in the project brings daytime trips which helps shops and restaurants survive. Having residential in the project brings the night time trips. Helps those same folks survive and also makes a place for the employment base, housing stock for the employment base so we believe pretty strongly, just like the previous studies did that this is an ideal mix and we look forward to working to ref nc that. Dial those in and bring those forward for you in the next stages. So I think at this point we'll ask Jeff to come up and walk through some of the design aspects and then we'll have some close on the planning components and go from there. Jeff Hysjulien: Thank you for having us this evening. My name is Jeff Hysjulien with RSP Architects and very excited to be a part of this project. As Darren had mentioned early on Avienda has been kind of termed as the branded name and destination for this development and as it ties into both life and beauty we've tied that into our philosophy of how we approach the architectural and site planning design for this project. Another key statement that we have is we consider this to be a healthy way of life village that's going to really try and tie in both the mix of architectural elements, site planning elements, even into how we approach it from a tenant and leasing perspective is how can we really make this to be a very complimentary and pedestrian friendly development that will enhance what Chanhassen is and what it will become in the future. And again as we talk about architectural characteristics we have some illustrations on the board that really are intended to show what the character of the buildings could be. This is 7 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 showing some of the retail and pedestrian scale shopping experience that may take place in this development. A conscious effort will be paid to both the size and scale and quality of the materials done on the landscaping as well as lighting and as we are starting to experience some of the longer evenings it's such a key part to our climate so we want to make sure that it's very inviting year round for this facility. Let's see if this works. This starts to kind of show us some of what the potential that could happen for some of the elements as Darren will talk a little more about storm water and ponding and how do we create a real world class, quality destination that utilizes all the site amenities that this has potential to bring about both when it comes into potentially restaurants but exposure along Powers and what is that first impression that it says to people come into the community. We know that there's a diverse mix of user types. This could be some examples of what the office component could be. If you take a look at this it will get down to the quality of materials. Natural stone. Glazing. Metal accents but are very complimentary but yet profound architectural experience. This will also carry through when we start to determine what the housing components will be both multi -family or high density. We'll pay special attention to the quality of the materials. The proportions of the buildings. Very conscious of the height and sight lines both from the units but also back onto the facilities. And really the spaces inbetween is going to be a very key piece. We've talked about landscaping elements including benches, lighting. We know that there may be a roundabout that's a part of this so how are we going to treat that in a very architectural and landscape pleasing design fagade but how can we tie that into the branding as well. Again these are images only meant to illustrate the character of what could be this gateway entrance as you're coming off of Powers and 212 but really conscious effort to the ground plane as we experience it both walking, biking, and also by vehicle but you can see it will be a complimentary mix of natural stone, planting material, paving patterns and using all of the site elements in a very aesthetically pleasing fashion. And again this kind of comes back to the concept plan. I think as your packet illustrates there's been many studies of different ways to connect both Bluff Creek to the neighborhood and from Powers and in the center portion of the site this is just one of the ideas that's out there. It's really being tested with both the market reality of the interest level but also making sure that we have a pedestrian friendly connection that ties within the development but also extending throughout the neighborhoods and always keeping in mind that this has to be a world class facility. There will be both an internal architectural review team that I'll be a part of along with Bahram and the leadership group and as well as this as the planning process so there'll be many, many layers of involvement and discussion and dialogue about what these elements will be as we move along this path. That's it, thank you. Or is there one more? Oh and these were the sketches we were talking about. Really taking a look, the perimeter has kind of identified itself based off of some of the site logistics. The transitions from the single family housing as you work your way east back to Powers and again what happens in the center is still a real key element that's going to be driven by both the marketplace and interest but also making sure that we've got those gathering places. That there are plaza components. That there are green spaces. There are those comfortable walking connections that tie everything together and these are a part of many other options that we've taken a look at and will continue to study as they move forward. 13 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 Darren Lazan: Thanks Jeff. So I just wanted to back up to, probably go back all the way to this slide here and just touch briefly on some of the engineering components that were discussed. Again this is very early on. This is what we call our development concepts. This lets us quantify the square footages of different uses. The parking required for those to start to bring those into balance. We think we're close to a balance right now on building size and parking so now we start layering in storm water treatment components and work through that process. Right now on, from the engineering perspective on the storm water side we are looking at preserving a component in the northwest comer. Currently there's a wetland there. Whether it's preserved and enhanced with some treatment prior to the wetland discharge or not we're not 100 percent certain but we're going to look at some treatment up in that comer. A lot of the treatment for this site, as we look to mimic the existing drainage patters, predominantly the northeast quadrant of the project, the heart of the project goes to the east and is treated underneath, goes under Powers and is treated on that MnDOT piece of right-of-way currently and we've walked this with agencies and our staff, there's a question as to how that gets treated there. It's by design supposed to move through some swales to a pond that's just off the screen here but there's concern that it isn't. It's short circuiting that pond and going into the wetland so we're looking to do some repair work and some new design work there to help treat that. As we contribute more water to it we want to make sure that functions well. We're looking at a fair amount of underground storm water that will be treated with this project just by sheer demand of the space but we're also looking at a pretty significant water re -use system so we'll be looking at distributed water re -use for all the users for irrigation so it's not individual site by site but rather we'll collect that on the project as a whole to distributed much like a water main or utility main or purple line system that will distribute re -use water for the entire project so that's a pretty innovative component that we look to add. And then as Kate had mentioned earlier we are working with team members at bringing some truly strong traffic components that help ease the speed through there. Deal with pedestrian crossings. Help work through our plazas and open spaces and make sure those are all well integrated and function as designed so we're excited to have this team working on the project and look forward to getting to that next development stage. So very brief schedule laid out there. Again this is, as always at this point in the project a very aggressive schedule but we are looking to get through the process on PUD and the AUAR over the winter with an eye on getting permitted and breaking ground, doing a lot of the grading as soon as we can in the spring. The initial phase will certainly be the mass grading and the infrastructure which at least will be the east/west connection of Bluff Creek Boulevard. Could be all of the infrastructure depending on the rest of the timing with the possibility of going vertical with building construction in the fall or the following spring. So with that I'll certainly stand for any questions you may have. I will, because this is an informational meeting I will take notes, both with your comments and resident comments and would welcome the opportunity to come back up at the end as well to answer any resident questions that come up. So with that I'll stand for questions. Weick: We can open it up to the commission, questions for the applicant and developer at this time. And then after that I think, if we want to go back and clarify any. 6 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 Aanenson: Yeah I just wanted again review the process. I think we've kind of put a lot in front of you right now. It seems like how can we get our arms around this big project and I just wanted to give you a similar project which it took a long time to build out but Villages on the Pond came in as we were the first ones to do kind of a vertical horizontal mix. St. Hubert's was looking for a new site and they wanted to find a way to do shared parking so that required an environmental document on that and within that then we put together a PUD and in that PUD there's architectural standards. There's landscaping standards. There's things in the environmental document that drives what uses can be in there and that's based on trip generation so all those things will also be included in this. So while they talked about architectural standards we'll also put those into the PUD so when they come back in that's what they'll be measured against. So right now we're just trying to get the outside threshold of what, you know what's the square footage of the different type of mixes that could go in there and certainly as long as you stay within certain thresholds things may move around a little bit. As we know there two things are flexible and it still requires hearings and anything that would come forward but that's the direction we're moving right now is to put together as we move forward not only the environmental documents but then when they come back through a PUD which you would have comment. A public hearing on and then how that's set up. The uses. The standards. All the like so that's the direction we're moving so their goal is to try to be working on that over the winter into the spring so it's going to take some time. There might be some, come and check in and meet some other neighborhood meetings to make sure we're all moving in the same direction because they don't want to go too far and find out that things aren't aligned so that will be a process. Darren Lazan: That's a great point too. We certainly plan on being back here I think 3 or 4 more times before we're fully approved. We have had one new neighborhood meeting and we'll plan on another as the details start to come together when we have more to share so that's certainly a process. We look at a journey that we look at making with you, not for you so. Tietz: Mr. Chairman? Yeah Darren you have come before us before. Last year with a pre -use and I'm just curious what has changed? You seem, Landform seemed to respect as you know wetlands and stormwater management is pretty critical in this community as well as trees and buffers and neighborhoods. But in the concepts that you presented to us last year you seemed to respect the primary wetlands and this time the major wetland in the center of the property is totally asphalted over. What's changed? Darren Lazan: Sure. That's a great question. So one of the reasons that there was the preservation of wetland one last year, it was not on this property. If you recall that fell on the 40 acre adjacent property so one was on that property. One straddled the property or that complex straddled so then when you're holding that edge you really don't have much choice. I can't grade my neighbor's property so it changes what can be done with the project. With the project coming in as a whole we're able to look at the whole project and decide how best to lay that out. How to work with that. Wetlands are a great question and an ongoing challenge for us to make work One of the challenges is that existing wetland complex is significantly lower than the iT Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 surrounding roadways so when you look at preserving that wetland in the center you have significant walls or significant slopes that contribute down to those. They become kind of collection points for everything that blows in the wind and a little tougher to maintain so that's a challenge. Doesn't mean they can't be protected. It just becomes a challenge. We've had a lot of discussion in our office and with agencies over the last couple months, the storm water requirements now have gotten considerably tougher. Even tougher than last year. Specifically the extraction requirements. The infiltration which we can't do here so we're going to be treating otherwise with re -use but when you have that higher level of storm water treatment you're taking every one of those small rainfalls. You really take away those wetlands hydrology. Maybe get none of the small storms. They get some of the large storms but that's typically not what helps them survive and we're seeing a lot of secondary impacts in our wetlands. Maybe not initial impacts because we can avoid them but we see a lot of secondary impacts when we steal all that hydrology. Send it you know into a storm water system or into a filtration system and then off the site so that is another challenge to preserving those. It changes how we approach the wetland piece. And then finally we have, we look through the quality of those. A number of those, not the 2 in the center but a number of those around the perimeter are very low quality. They're farmed wetlands. They're very small. They're degraded. Some have been filled. The County had a roadway project and filled the one on the far northwest corner to the point where it really doesn't have the size it had once before so we look at kind of the degradation that's gone on over the years as well. Those all resulted in our current concept plan. I do want to be clear that we have a wetland permitting process and I know you're aware of that process but this entire approval set is an iterative process. We need to set the bar for the AUAR so we can analyze trips and environmental impacts and the traffic impacts on the surrounding roadways. Sewer, water, utilities, all those components that make up the AUAR we have to assess those so we start on the high side. We evaluate that. We measure that against what the surrounding roadways and infrastructure can support while we parallel that effort on our permitting and we will go through a what's called a sequencing analysis. The avoidance minimization and mitigation but it's no secret. The concept plan is on the screen before you. Our desire is to fill and create quality wetland spaces elsewhere. We think the property to the south that's a MnDOT mitigation area has been tremendously successful. We're told that it's been requested that it be upgraded to exceptional quality. We'd like to do something similar on the east side of the project as was done on the south and create that sort of exceptional wetland where we can feed it the hydrology where it can be protected where it's not 30 feet below or 25 feet below adjacent development. We think that's a better use of the land and a better management of the resource but you're right on. Those wetland 1 and 2, the ones in the center of the site are the biggest challenge and we look to continue working on those through this process. Madsen: There was public input regarding walkability of this project. Bike ability and perhaps having mass transit in there. Could you highlight where you've included those items and perhaps how they've been interconnected with existing trail systems? Darren Lazan: Sure. I actually don't necessarily have a good exhibit for where we're at conceptually with that across the board. I think one of our partners on the engineering side that 11 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 we met earlier with staff this week on is engineering firm Toole Engineering. They have a nationwide presence in multimodal pedestrian kind of innovative highway and treatment and speed reduction. Traffic calming that's their specialty and we met with staff to talk about bringing them on the team. I think they were fairly well received or they're certainly doing their due diligence on our team this week and next I assume but that's the strength we've brought to the team to address those very items. Now I'm not sure where the mass transit component comes in. That's a new one. Be glad to address that going forward. It's a great time to bring that in now so we can include that in but each of the center court yard components will include some form of that pedestrian experience, and Jeff talked a little bit about it. They range from small amphitheaters to green spaces to just the walkable components along the shops and that small scale pedestrian experience. That's absolutely part of that center component and then we'd look to try to tie those to that outside ring where possible, specifically out to the office users so they can get into the center at lunchtime and the restaurants can come back and forth between shopping and dining. We are looking at a strong pedestrian connection to the west to that neighborhood. That was contemplated through the townhome area and in some of the previous exhibits. I think it's on this one. Yep through there. Now we're going to discuss with staff making that a vehicular connection and we can certainly continue to work not even with a vehicular connection we'd have a strong pedestrian connection and try to separate those. And then we have a connection to the south that's an emergency connection that's likely to be a, basically a wide paved trail and we're looking to integrate that into the trails. If you recall last time last year, and this is the exhibit I'm missing. We're looking at developing a set of trails through the Bluff Creek area to help folks move in and out of that area into the neighborhoods, into the center and kind of enjoy that bluff as well so we're looking at external connections into the center. Internal connections that make it walkable and more pedestrian friendly. We're looking at a high trip capture percentage. Trying to get folks to come for one purpose. Stay for two or three so to do that we need to facilitate that pedestrian movement and that's our plan today as the concept plan sits. Madsen: Okay, thank you. Darren Lazan: Yep. Tietz: Steve one more? Weick: Yeah please. Tietz: The McCombs study focused on retail and commercial. Darren Lazan: Correct. Tietz: Yet you have 170 some thousand square feet of office. What's driving that and who, what's the demand for office space in this quadrant? 12 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 Darren Lazan: We've had, we did not have a market study in office but we've had extremely strong interest by pretty high end users that would like to be part of the project as it's currently imagined so we're judging that one on a purely market driven solution. Major components that want to take pretty large spaces and be part of the project so right now that's what's driving our use. That use. Other than that we relied a little bit on the comp plan that designated this as an office campus potential so we assume that the market study was done with the original 2008 survey but again nothing's better than having a market driven solution so when we have major folks in that medical office community coming to us and saying we want to be part of the project, that's a pretty strong indication for us that we're on the right track. Tietz: And if you could kind of help me visualize the heights of those buildings. You know it's just flat, there's footprints. There's square footage. Are they 2 story? 5 story? Where are the highest buildings proposed? Are they along Powers and Lyman or are they interior to the site? Darren Lazan: So with the exception of the apartment projects on the south, which we understand will have some screening challenges that we'll work through and we will have at the next stage for your review some pretty strong sight line studies to go along with those. With the exception of those uses everything else is really imagined to be one and two story you know products so the townhomes are going to be two story I'm sure and the retail is 20 foot to single story. The bigger components may be a little bit taller but will generally be single story. The hotels could be, and they're closer to Powers. They could be up to 3 stories and then some of the architecture that Jeff had put together on this one contemplates 3 stories potentially for and maybe Kate could color that with the underlying zoning height restrictions but I think the PUD would allow you to review under this setting what heights are appropriate and that's what we'll be likely relying on. Tietz: So those would typically be on the Powers and the Lyman side. The edges. Damen Lazan: Correct yeah. Tietz: East and north edges. Darren Lazan: Correct. Tietz: Thank you. Weick: Just I guess probably to Kate because it's within the report itself. Can I maybe bounce back and forth or? There's a lot of mention within the report about complimenting the existing downtown Chanhassen area. Which I mean there's pluses and minuses to that. As we're trying to create a lifestyle center and you hear the uses and the people like hotels, apartments you'd want to create an environment there that afforded those residents, I would think all of the things that they would need within walking distance right? You wouldn't want them to travel 5 minutes to the downtown so I was concerned when I read under the recommendations that there's 13 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 actually a list of prohibited uses within the site which is a pretty strong word. Is that, are the prohibited uses negotiable? Aanenson: Yes. Those are all recommendations correct. Weick: Okay. Okay. And I get that it's under the recommended side but I mean obviously the use is prohibited for like a grocery store or a liquor store or. Aanenson: Yeah so we did say up to 25,000 square feet for grocery. We know that they're looking at something larger so that was just a point of discussion. So right now we're just giving you recommendations. I think if there's certain uses that you know you would want to let the council know you have concerns with then I think now is the appropriate time to state those but I think that's something we'll definitely be working on as we go through this process. Kind of landing on those appropriate mix. If you recall when we put this district together we said that the downtown meets your daily needs. You know you can run to the library. You can go to the post office. Run to a grocery store. A convenience store to pick up something but we saw this as comparison shopping and certainly it's because it has residential component which we want as some of those transitional areas, similarly the office on the north side again providing a nice transition. Nice edge. Little bit higher level of architecture. That there would be some other support uses there. Similarly we did a PUD where actually the Lifetime sits so we put some support uses there too. There is convenience gas there. There is dry cleaners, those kind of things that would support if you're there you know on you lunch hour you can take care of some of that business. Banks. That sort of thing so similar we put those, some of those things in here too. Weick: Okay because I would, yeah I just envisioned people you know going for dinner and walking to a movie and so having things like a theater. Aanenson: Yes we would agree on that too yeah, and maybe it didn't come out clear on the original one but yes, something like that would. Weick: Okay. Other comments? Looks like you're itching to say something down there. Tietz: I'll have another one. Just go through my list. I've looked at the aerial photos and looked at topo maps and walked extensively over the whole 110 acres. You're going to have to pancake the site to do what you're doing and I find that really disrespective o� you know disrespecting the site. Not only the wetlands are being eliminated. The current wetlands. Whether there's alternative method to improve I don't know and we'll have to wait to see but this site could be in Rochester or Omaha. You know there's a lot of terrain change on that site and the concept to do what you've proposed here you're going to pancake it. You're going to move tens of thousands of yards of soil and you're probably going to have to export soil and I don't know what your preliminary engineering studies indicate but this is really dramatic and I'm surprised that a concept would ignore the terrain. 14 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 Darren Lazan: So I'm assuming you're looking for a response. There wasn't really a question there. Tietz: Well. Darren Lazan: No you're absolutely right. There's a tremendous amount of grade challenges on this site. I would disagree somewhat that we will pancake the site. I think we've worked considerably through our concept grading to preserve existing drainage patterns. To make successful transitions but there's a lot of challenges in there. I mean you could take the townhome site on the far west side of our project. There's 15 feet of grade difference between the loop road and the existing neighborhood. We originally proposed breaking that roadway connection to try to allow that terracing. To let those existing grade differences exist but then we have to make that connection understandably so, we have to make that connection. Now all of a sudden it changes how much we can leave high and we have to tear into that side of the site. We have to make a east/west connection that traverses right past the wetlands that drops down almost 25 feet and then back up again so you know we have to get a road meeting MSA standards in and out of there and there's slope requirements and stormwater treatment that has to go with that. So those are all a lot of challenges for us. There is a tremendous amount of relief. We are doing a tremendous amount of grading. Right now the site is a virtual balance but that's totally dependent on the soils we encounter. If we get into our tougher soils we will be exporting and changing grades or importing other material but understand your comments completely. Ideally we wouldn't need to do that but there's a lot of constraints on the site... Tietz: Well is it being driven by total square footage and marketing study or is it being driven by the site and what's appropriate for the community? Darren Lazan: Sure. So the community's established regional commercial or lifestyle center as a desire and need. It ranked high in the surveys. As far as lifestyle centers go this is considerably smaller than most and you get to a certain point where you have to have compatible uses and the synergy of those uses to be successful. I think in your own zoning study it shows that ideally a lifestyle center should have 2 anchors. In our lifestyle component we really have room for one so it gets to a certain point where it gets down to a critical mass where you can't get the support of those other uses. You don't have the synergy of the office getting into the retail and making those remain vibrant. You don't get the residential in there that add to the vibrancy and the sustainability of that retail so we really believe we have looked at this as a regional center. We're on the very small side of what makes up regional centers. We have the pieces that will support each other and make it a successful center but if you look at the kind of reduction that would be necessary to preserve the wetlands 1 and 2, to preserve the existing terrain you'd have disconnected commercial uses. You wouldn't have a lifestyle center and maybe that's the best use for the site but right now the community has designated and guided this a regional center. The current owner has a desire to fill that desire and this we believe is the approach to making that successful in the long term. IS Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 Randall: Just real quick question. Without having the ability to really judge the scale and everything, is there going to be an issue at all with restocking or having trucks come in to support your retail environment and that type of thing? Is that, is there enough parking for them and easy access to have them come in and I'm just picturing a bunch of semi trucks coming in at various times and that type of thing. Darren Lazan: Yep, great question. Always a concern on centers of this size or retail components individually of this size. One thing that hasn't been added that I will mention now is we really just show the two connections, full connections to Lyman and Powers and one of the things that's been discussed a number of times is looking at right-in/right-out connections in addition to the main connections and where we see those is most beneficial is that service accesses. Getting those guys into the back of the retail components easier without traveling through the middle of the pedestrian or the middle of the small vehicle spaces so we're going to look at adding and complimenting the access management plan with those. Each of the areas behind the larger retailers is, contains the typical dock space for loading and unloading. The 60 foot turn arounds to get the vehicle in and out of there so they're not backing out but quite frankly what we found in almost every small retail component is they want their deliveries to the front so we're bringing those typically through the front in small and medium sized vehicles and that's what this generally contemplates for the small retail components. Weick: Good questions. Any other comments or questions at this time? Hearing none we'll open up, thank you very much. Great presentation. Thank you for the detail as well, at least in this opening format. We would open up the public portion of the hearing at this time. Anyone wishing to speak an opinion on this project at this time please step forward. State your name and address and your thoughts. Please. Bhanu Thota: Hi. I'm Bhanu Thota. I'm a resident of the, on the Mills Drive very close to the proximity on the west side of the proposed plan. I have a couple of questions. One we have about 400 apartments put into the plan and 100 less, I don't have the exact number for the townhomes. Haven't heard very much on how the school zoning will be impacted with the increase in the number of homes inside the proposed plan but it will impact the existing school zones inside the area. Weick: Okay. You want to answer those or do you want to just want me to note them and we'll okay. Aanenson: Sure. The school will come in more detail. We did receive a letter from the school district that wants to make sure, one of the projects is contemplated for senior housing. 55 and plus so the apartments at market rate, they just bad some concerns on where they would load and unload and we would certainly look at that at the next level of detail. I also want to point out that there was 3 letters from people on Mills and your's is one of them. I did pass those out so they, you sent me an email. 16 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 Bhanu Thota: Sure. Aanenson: Yeah so they got passed out. Weick: And those will be in the packet. In the record. Aanenson: Yep part of the record. So you'd be part of the record too on that so those are levels of details that we'll be working through on that. And same with townhouse project so they would go internal streets and not stop on the collector roads. Bhanu Thota: Okay, thank you. Weick: Thank you. Please. Joseph Shamla: Joseph Shamla, 1691 Mayapple Pass. Weick: Welcome. Joseph Shamla: Thank you. So I live in the Pioneer Pass development which is down to the southwest of here. I guess my main concern is being one of living real close to one of these 3 accesses to this regional mall, and if we could get this thing designed to discourage people from using Bluff Creek to get to the mall and more focused on the other access points I would appreciate that. The other thing, the woods that's out there it's beautiful. If there's a way that we could preserve the woods that would he nice and that's about it. Weick: Thank you. Joseph Shamla: Thank you. Aanenson: The woods are being contemplated for the reservation. That has always been in the plans. It's in that area so they will be able to count that towards their green space. I just wanted to mention too that Darren mentioned that they're looking at bringing on Toole Design so the engineering department's kind of vetting them but they are experts in that issue. Pedestrian connections. Vehicular connections. Traffic calming so it's I think will be a great component if it all vets out that they can give them and us some really good ideas to make sure that everybody wants it to be successful. Successful for the neighbors. Successful for them. Successful for the City and things that would make it unhappy for the neighbors to the west would not be good so I think it's great that they've thought about bringing that type of a team on board. Weick: Thank you. And the woods in question are the ones to the southwest, and nothing's changed in there. 17 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 Aanenson: Correct. Weick: Yet. As we. Aanenson: Yes. Weick: Okay. Tietz: Kate I have a question about that. In walking through the woods when was the tree inventory conducted because there's metal tags and numbered on all the specimen oaks and a lot of the other trees. When was that done? Aanenson: I'm not sure. Did you guys do a tree survey? Tietz: Did you guys do that or? Darren Lazan: Mr. Chair yes. We did a complete tree inventory per the significant tree requirements of the City. Tietz: Was that last year? Darren Lazan: That was last year yeah. Yeah. So we do have that available. We don't at this stage generally show those but we know what's out there and I think we went about halfway into the woods knowing we're not going to go any farther than the fringe there and then we did all of the ones in the middle of the site as well so we can quantify those. Tietz: So this is a test Darren. What's tree number 701? Darren Lazan: There's thousands of trees. Thank you sir. Tietz: Thanks. Aanenson: I didn't know they did that level of detail. Typically if there's a preservation area you don't have to do that but clearly there's some areas as you go down that slope that may be impacted for grading purposes or the like. It is part of the Bluff Creek area which we preserved. I mean that's some of the fantastic views that you see as you come along coming off of Audubon on Bluff Creek Drive looking where we've got the trail crossing underneath that bevo structure. Fantastic views so yes, those would be some significant trees we want to save. Tietz: Good. Weick: The floor is still open for comment. Please, yeah come on up. 18 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 Nick Perlman: Hi my name is Nick Perlman. I live on 1812 Commonwealth Boulevard so just let's say due west of that direction. Weick: Great. Nick Perlman: So just a question here around the light pollution and where kind of, what kind of expectations will we have or will it be signs? Anything like that. Like light lamps. That's it. Weick: Thank you. Aanenson: That's a great question and that's something that we'll definitely spend a lot of time on in the PUD. We do require photometrics on projects but that would go also to the height of buildings that they're shielded but I think that's a great question and that's something that we definitely want to look at in the PUD standards to minimize that so it's not lit up and provides those neighborhoods. I think Darren mentioned it too there's some, you know you've got some built in buffers like the trees for the Camden Ridge area to the north but how we provide those other buffers through light attenuation so that's something we'll definitely put into the PUD. And with that would also be noise which is the AUAR looks at that so we'll make sure those components are both looked at. Weick: Thank you. Jon Gilbert: Hi my name's Jon Gilbert. I'm at 1641 Jeurissen Lane. I'm in the southwest comer near the Bluff Creek overlay area and I've walked through that area as well and there are some rather large oaks and maples back there that are 5 feet in diameter within the area that's been marked already. There's several of them so it's nice. The swale, there's ton of it out there as you were talking about that would have to be pulled down. The burden is does he have to go down 15 feet I think to get to where you want to put the road to connect through to Mills but if a simple cut and fill job and you're leveling the entire area just put that in near the waste water, excuse me the wetland area in the bottom right and everything will level out real nicely. Just a couple of points. I think the overlay requires the Bluff Creek overlay requires that that area be preserved. I'm sure it's negotiable. It's negotiable it will be at, in my opinion and some of my neighbors tremendous loss. You have a natural water buffer area in there. There's ponds within the woods. There are the large trees. Mature trees. Certain species that I'm sure are other places of Minnesota but there may be some that we don't know about and I'm sure the AUAR will look into that but my contention is that area is supposed to be preserved. Myself and several neighbors of the 145 homes that are only have a single point of access right now we've talked about what we were told when we moved in that the 2030 plan was supposed to maintain that area for another 25 years or so. I looked at those numbers and he said yeah, it's a place where I'd want to raise my kids. Be able to take them back there. You know walk around the area. Now onto some other points. Looking at the 2 anchor stores, you've got 60,000 feet on the west and you've got 90,000 down on the right. For my neighbors that's about the size of a Cub on the west side and about the size of the Walmart in Eden Prairie. It's a little bit smaller. Walmart's 19 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 about 110,000 square feet. Then you throw in the parking. It's about the same so that's just to give you a visual on what you'd have down there. The visual that I think you gave for eye line or eye sights, whatever you call it were the building for the apartment buildings in my back yard. I think 312 would probably put you at 4 or 5 stories. You had mentioned that there's 128 parking spots but there'd probably be a 3 level garage. I look at the 312 and I look at the other numbers that you have for the other areas. 72 and 92 and if we do the math right, and I think this is noted by the commission last year in your report that it far exceeds the R-16 zoning that you have for density. If you look at the, and I'm sure it again can be negotiated but if you do the math on the net developable areas you're looking at not 16 but 36 units. You're not looking at 16 but you are looking at 11 in this particular case for the 72 units on, I think on the west there and for the 55 and older, if that's the 3.45 acres you're at 25 to 30 units so you're exceeding the R-16 so there's some disparity there that I'm trying to wrestle with when I read through the 2030 plan, the Bluff Creek overlay and then the PUD requirements so that's not lining up for me. What does line up for me though is I think you're trying to get the maximum footprint that you can. I do support the project. I think it's helpful to the City. I think it has to be done. I think it has to be done the right way. I don't think this is the right way. I don't think it represents the walkability that I think myself and neighbors have envisioned. It seems to be, it provides the tax base that you need and I am being selfish about the southwest comer in the woods specifically but I think if you lose that left hand side you lose 150 of those and you connect the 55 and older with the right hand side, the eastern portion of that group. I think you start meeting your density requirements. Then you have a park space available to you. That's the other thing that I really didn't see in the plans. I couldn't really appreciate it by looking at any of the layouts. I know it's going to be different as we move forward but I think that's going to be important to be able to have an area there, parks, some place where our community, our neighborhood has the ability to not, we just don't have the toddler tot you know play area that's a private area and the bluff preserve. We also have the large area up by Commonwealth which is accessible and we all use it. We all can use it but if there was some park area for the residents that you're proposing to put there I think that they would enjoy that as well as the other areas. In terms of the woods themselves I thought it'd be nice to put some paths back there. It's, I think it's probably relatively sensitive and if you are going to disturb it, it would probably disturb the dynamics that but that will come out in the AUAR. I think that was all the points that I had. 2030 plan. Anchor stores. Buffers. You talked about bringing additional sidewalks in there as well. I think you do need a buffer of something between the existing development on River Rock North and then the condos behind that. And I think that's enough for this time. Thank you. I appreciate your time. Weick: Thank you. Aanenson: I'm just going to add to that. The park commission did meet on this topic. It's on page 31 of 37 of your staff report. Kind of some of their recommendations and again I think some of that sometimes takes place of what we kind of say kind of those urban treats. Whether it's park benches. Some places to sit. Whether it's with the restaurants or some of the other commercial or is walkability. Of course preserving the wetlands in the Bluff Creek Overlay "rZi: Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 District but I certainly that would be something in the PUD too that would be the responsibility of a site plan coming in. If we identified those areas where we want bike racks. Street furniture. Outdoor tables. Those sort of things that we would definitely put that into the PUD so when projects come in we have kind of an idea or an expectation of where those should be going, including or not excluding the trails and those connectivity sort of things so I see this as a layer of sheets that we would be putting into the PUD. Weick: Including neighborhood parks right? Didn't I read in there that. Aanenson: Well they talked about some public space but I don't know it'd be more, it wouldn't be the same type of a neighborhood park that you would have in the subdivisions to the west. Weick: Right, right. Aanenson: It's a different type of a feel. Weick: Okay. Aanenson: Yeah. Weick: Okay, other comments? Dan Fuchs: Dan Fuchs, 1862 Colonial Lane 95. I support the development and what it's trying to do but what this doesn't really do is it lacks charm. Complete no charm one way or another. We see stone and brick. Perfectly fine. The metal looks nice. Modem architecture but what do people want and where are they moving to nowadays in the city. They're going back to the inner cities. Why? They can walk to the grocery store. Have a place for coffee. Go to local restaurants. Not fast food. They want something that they can be part of their community. Now you also have the nice area over in Excelsior. Look at Excelsior and what it's doing. Everybody's going downtown. Downtown Excelsior to have fun. Do something. What do I see here? Asphalt. Why can't they use the land for something unique, charm? Build it as a foundation for what's going on as something that's an attraction not just oh here's another parking lot. Here's something else. Last one I have is you have these huge retail stores. With the way everything is going on a commerce what is going to keep those stores in business? Thank you. Weick: Thank you. Please. Good evening. Marco Rasgattino: Good evening. Marco Rasgattino, 9141 River Rock Drive. I have a suggestion. We'd like to be able to access to the map well. The commercial part that it's on the top west comer. Aanenson: Over here? 21 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 Marco Rasgattmo: Yes exactly. You're having an apartment just behind that commercial area which, yeah. It would be the neighbors that would be traffic that would be probably some grass around. Why don't have the commercial side on the south side where you have a swamp and you have a, you have the woodlands. You don't have anything on the back and have the senior apartments in front of that medium density area so you have a transition from the existing low density, medium density and high density area and keep all the commercial side south of the park. With the access for the commercial directly to 212 on the east side so no noise and no pollution to the apartments and to the medium and low density area. That's my suggestion. Weick: Thank you. Other comments? Please. Zhexin Zhang: Hi, I'm Zhexin Zhang. I live on 1455 Bethesda Circle so you can actually see my house on the very bottom left corner there. So you know speaking with a lot of the neighbors in the area, most of those homes there, one of our biggest concerns is the traffic. I think we have a really unique situation there where you're coming off an off ramp into a high commercial space and then directly into a high residential area and our concern is this is that Bluff Creek is a diagonal road between Lyman and Powers and Pioneer so our concern is people are going to be taking short cuts where they're going to shop at this place. They're going to take that road diagonally into Chaska and that retail space there off of Pioneer. I understand the developers and the City is looking into traffic calming. My concern is that's insufficient. If you look at our neighbors to the south over on Pioneer Pass they're already having issues with Bluff Creek being so busy because of people going through that park is getting difficult access for kids and most of these families have kids and so my concern is how do we keep that Bluff Creek low enough traffic. It serves a neighborhood but try and keep out the visitors because obviously I think everybody would agree here that's not the purpose of that. That portion of the road. So my question you know kind of just spit balling does Bluff Creek have to connect off the 212 ramp? It just to me, even if it goes up to Lyman. Provides another access that way it shields the neighborhood away from the main traffic from this commercial development and so I would love it if we entertain more options of looking at diverting Bluff Creek off of this main development. Thank you. Weick: Thank you. Great feedback so far. Are there other comments? Questions? Good evening. Jeff Franz: Jeff Franz, 8950 Sunset Trail. Similar to that but just 3 questions. With the marketing study pulling all these people from all over, what's the total traffic per day? Weick: Go ahead. Darren Lazan: Do you want to ask all 3? Weick: Ask all 3 and then we'll answer them. 22 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 Jeff Franz: First one. Then the second one is how much of that is going to come off 212 and how much of that is going to come off Lyman? Weick: Is that it or did you have another one? Jeff Franz: That's it. Weick: Okay, thank you. I don't know that we've done complete traffic study. Darren Lazan: Are you ready? Weick: Yeah please. Aanenson: Yeah I mean that's what the AUAR will do. It will look at where the trips are coming from directional. Turning movements. You know whether they decel lanes. Excel lanes. If it's adequate so that information will be studied in detail and those will be one of the hearings we'd have that the neighbors could get informed on, yeah. Weick: Okay, thank you. Good evening. Varun Parvataneni: Hi Varun. I stay off 9131 River Rock Drive. Right by, just into the proposed plan so right at that Mills and River Rock intersection. So the proposed plan doesn't show the regular connectivity between Mills and the development and I guess the builder or developer is also inclined towards it so again just to what the gentleman raised, how do we need to get the traffic concerns if we are raising for that, if he intended to have that road connection on the Mills Drive towards, into the development so how do we raise, how do we mitigate the traffic concerns? As someone mentioned we do have a lot of young infants and toddlers in the community and there are a lot of new development which extends further north. Have a lot of new homes coming in which I supposed have a lot of young kids as well because I know a few of them. I talk to my neighbors who are, I talk to at least 4 of the neighbors who are on the pretty edge of the development. Pretty much they have the same concern as me that that regular connection into the development probably will increase traffic concerns so how do we mitigate that? Weick: Thank you. Varun Parvataneni: Thank you. Jon Gilbert: Just a follow up if I may. Weick: Sure thing. 23 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 Jon Gilbert: Jon Gilbert on Jeurissen Lane again. I just want to echo this gentleman's comments about charm and the walkability of the proposal. I'm at that point now where I could popular that 55 and older and I would consider it but not like this. If I were coming in from out of town and not looking for a full blown residence with kids and I will be an empty nester before too long but I would be looking at something that offers that charm. Excelsior is wonderful. 'There are places in the Midwest and the West which have different kinds of walkability. I think I go back to college days out in Colorado in Boulder where there were places, pedestrian walkways. Plenty of supported retail. Local retail. Local dollars versus the big box. What's the sustainability on that so I just wanted to echo my sentiments to that man's good comments. Weick: Thank you. Any other comments, questions? Darren Lazan: Mr. Chair could I address a couple of those questions? Weick: Yes. Darren Lazan: Do you want to do it during the public hearing or do you want to close the public hearing? Weick: I'll close it yeah. Seeing no one else, there is one more chance. Seeing no one come forward we'll close the public portion of the hearing. Please. Darren Lazan: Thank you Mr. Chair and thank you to the residents. All great comments. I guess I starred a couple of these to make sure I circled back and talked a little bit about them but I again I can be available afterwards too if somebody had additional questions or if you have any I'd be glad to answer them tonight. I want to reiterate that this is very much an iterative process. This is a concept. It is a very loose sketch to get rough numbers. To locate those uses in the approximate area where they seem to want to fall. To run those calcs so we can do the AUAR. Get that feedback. Then we continue to test the market so I really would encourage folks to hang tight on some of the deeper design comments just because we have to have a chance to vet this out against the AUAR. Consider the traffic. Look at that flow. Know what the numbers are. I can tell you that the ownership on this project wants to do a world class project. That they've made quality architecture and landscape architecture their top priority. That they want a walkable community with public spaces. They want small shops and experiential components. Big driver, Bahram has tremendous retail experience. Understands that this needs to be experiential in it's nature or it will not be successful so a big driver is to try to find ways through entertainment and other components to keep people engaged. To spend the day. To eat. To go through there so it's a big part of the design component. I don't want to, I don't want you to walk away from this very schematic sketch thinking that there's no there there because that is a big major component of the project and it will appear as we start to, as the project starts to take space and we get to the detail I guess. And the only thing I can add today to reinforce that are some of the quick concepts that Jeff has done on that center component in particular with the village green components and amphitheater component. Those walkable, it's really hard to see 24 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 at this scale but the brown area are those street front landscape architecture components where we get sidewalk dining. We get some of the small shops and the comparison shopping and so forth so we really understand. Hear your concern. We think the park components are a huge part of this project so the trails in the bluff area, interaction with the bluff and the wetlands to the south and hopefully to the east, that transition component with the neighbors on the far west side we understand completely that there needs to be buffering. Landscaping. Anything else to help ease that transition. I just want to remind that that's that next step. We want the ability to make sure things shake out in their approximate areas. Get all our AUAR feedback. Come back and do the sight lines studies. Come back and do the landscape plans. Come back and do some of the more detailed work that will inform that design so those really are, those are generally the ones I had starred in there and the rest I think Kate has addressed or can continue to address. Other than as a development team we'd like to add that we really are supportive of the City's Comprehensive Plan on making those roadway connections. We'll help facilitate those but they're not our, we're not the driver on those. Those are regional or community drivers that help that so we'll continue to work to meet those needs and follow their lead on that but I want to remind everybody that that is something that is driven by the community, not necessarily this development. So with that I'll stand for any other questions you have. I just wanted to comment on those couple components. Weick: Okay, thank you. And thank you everybody for your comments and questions. Those will all be recorded for the record as well as I'll open it up now to further commission comments or questions. Mostly comments. Tietz: Steve? Weick: Yes. Tietz: Yeah I'm just surprised, you know I don't want to dwell on this wetland issue too much but there's free flowing water coming out of that primary wetland in the center of the site and that all flows to Lake Susan so I guess I'd be real curious to see the engineering studies that cap that and then pick up all that site water and properly contain it and release it. You've got a huge problem and a huge issue to deal with and I just hope that it can be, before we go any further and before we approve anything that these critical issues on topography and drainage and wetlands and the trees. I think the comments about the trees in that southwest comer is spectacular there and as Darren noted there are wetlands in there. There's free flowing water going through that, the extreme north edge where all the apartments are built. Or proposed so it's a real concern that you know I'd like to see a serious attempt at taking a crack at a plan that respects the topography and respects the wetlands to the extent and show us the economic loss to the community and tax base and the economic loss to the developers. Weick: Any other thoughts on that or other comments? I think as we think about the, did you have? 25 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 Undestad: Well I just I mean I wanted to comment that you know again at this level the conceptual plans here that in my opinion I think the developers have done a nice job in not maximizing. Not trying to get the biggest bang for the buck out of the space on here. Again it's conceptual but I think the spacing, the square footages, the uses and things that they're putting in right now I think to me they look good out here and I think that it's a good starting point. I will say again that through the planned unit development process for the public too that again he's broad stroked these schematics here but as the project proceeds we definitely get into much more detail on everything from lighting and architectural and the public spaces and traffic so there's a lot to go from here but I think just in general I think it's a good, good start. Yusuf. Kate? I was going to ask a question. So right now we have these 5 kind of proposed plans in front of us but I wonder if you could please kindly walk us through or just talk us through the next steps. So these 5 proposed options are not the end. Aanenson: No. So if we go back to, if I may go back to, I was going to go back to, this is what we're looking at. This here and it's more, and so this is illustrative and this is more quantitative so what they're looking at for the AUAR is these would be the, the numbers that would be analyzed for trip generation. Floor area ratio and give you some idea of scope. Could this site handle that and if it could what improvements would need to be made and that sort of thing so could it go less than that? Yes. Could some of those internal uses change? Could things be moved around? All this is really is driving those sort of factors. What it will also be looking at then as we talk about with these types of uses we will be looking at noise and light, wetland impacts as, that's one of the bigger issues moving forward is getting wetland permitting and jurisdictional review. Getting that permitting so as far as where the things sit on there that's again is illustrative. You know things may move around as we decide, or they decide that based on certain criteria this might be a better buffer based on height requirements something else should move. So that's right now just kind of a starting point. Yusuf: I just was hoping if you could please also clarify for us and for everyone else whether there will be fiurther reviews... Aanenson: Yep good question. So after it goes to the City Council all these comments will be forwarded up to the City Council. They will also add additional comments and give direction to the applicant and then they will start the environmental. We have to authorize that so Kimley- Horn who designed the Bluff Creek Boulevard, they'll be looking at the traffic generation and then Hoisington-Koegler who did the original AUAR will be doing the update so both those groups will be working on that. As that comes to fruition you will also see that and hold a public hearing on that, that final approval so you'll have input on that. Whether and looking at that data and giving your feedback and then hearing public comment on that too so that's one part of it. Then it would have to come back and it may be, as Darren stated it may be a series of meetings where we look at putting together that PUD and that would be more specific and what uses are going to where and looking at heights. Landscaping. Some of the traffic calming things we talked about. Connections. All those sort of things. Preservation areas so. Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 Yusuf: Thank you so I think at that point then we can... Aanenson: This is about 5-6. Yeah I would say 6 months of a lot of meetings back and forth including the neighborhood so, so I think there's ways of talking about how we'd make it for residents if we have information that they can get to. Some of those things we'll be talking to the applicant about too. Creating a site if they want to go and look at anything that's new that's come in. If they want to have a chance to review it to make it as transparent as possible so if they want to look at the AUAR documents ahead of time before, you know as it goes out to Planning Commission when they're public, they could also be reviewing those too so make it as transparent as possible. Yusuf: And then did the applicant, did you mention something about a Facebook page or something too? Darren Lazan: Sure we do have a relatively well followed Facebook page for the project. It was the original Quadrant project that we re -named Avienda so we have roughly 1,500 folks following. That is a tremendous way to keep up to date. We'll usually post, after tonight we'll post the plans that were at the meeting tonight and we'll have updates as to when the new meetings and neighborhood meetings are coming forward so that is a great spot, thanks for asking. Yusuf: Thank you. Thank you Kate. Madsen: I do like the fact that they have not maximized the retail that they could from the original reports and I do like, it appears that in the lower left hand comer the preservation of the bluff area as a wildlife area. I do have a concern about the wetland impact. I'm not sure how you're going to do that but you also have the concerns of the road construction and you can't have huge drop offs in your roads and you have to follow those rules so it really is a challenge. And I also have a concern about, on the west side or the back side of the commercial on the west part, how that will be buffered from the townhome area especially with the lights and the truck traffic and you know if they back up in there, that sort of thing so. But I do like that it's mixed with office and medical and commercial and housing. Weick: I think our role and the role of everybody here tonight is to provide observations and feedback so I think based on what we've seen and the information we've received I think all very valid points for the record. I did kind of drop the, some of the comments that have been made this evening into they sort of fall into 4 buckets. There's aesthetics that I think people are very concerned about moving forward. Whether it be site grading which then probably leads to the charm of what you actually create there as far as the buildings. There's noise and light pollution that I would consider aesthetics. Park space and open space. People voiced several times as well so that's one bucket. 'There's a traffic bucket that you know we'll look at but obviously that was a primary concern that came out of the meeting this evening. Specifically the access points for `*l Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 Bluff Creek on both sides. Not just going into the neighborhood but entering the site from 212 as well as the proposed entrance, I think it's at Mill is the name of the, so I think those 3 points are specific traffic concerns. I think there was some good density questions that came up just regarding, and obviously this is preliminary but we need to keep that into consideration and we will as these things move forward but that is a very valid concern that was raised, and finally I think the wetland preservation and how we do that moving forward so I think those, a lot of the comments fell into those 4 buckets so if we can certainly be sure in addition to everything that's noted by staff in the packet, if we can specifically make note of those items that came out this evening I think we'll be moving in a good direction. Aanenson: Thanks for that. Weick: Sure. Aanenson: That's kind of an eloquent way to put it so, so that for anybody tracking this item then these, this item will then be forwarded to the City Council on their November 20 meeting. A staff report will be generated for that too so anybody that wants to follow this item you're welcome to check the City's website a few days before the meeting. At least the Thursday before that Monday and the staff report will be available if anybody wants to read that and has questions or comments on that too so. Weick: There isn't a motion right? Aanenson: No there's not a motion so the item is now closed yeah so we can move onto the next item on the agenda. If you want to take a short bio break if people want to. Weick: Yeah we can take a little break. Allow, if you don't want to stick around for the rest of the exciting meeting you're welcomed to leave. We'll take a 3 minute break here. The Planning Commission took a short recess at this point in the meeting. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Yusuf noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated September 20, 2016 and the summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated October 4, 2016. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Aanenson: In case you hadn't heard, after 3 City Council meetings and a couple other work sessions Paisley Park Museum has been approved. That too is a PUD so as you know so restrictions on that so things are moving along there and actually they've modified and they're 28 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 regulating to see how their clientele's working so right now they're just open Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday so working through that and yes. Yusu : I was going to ask real quick, do you have any updates on how we're doing in terms of traffic wise? That was a big area of concern. Aanenson: Yeah so one of the things that we put in the report is that the council asked that they do a 6 month study to see how things are working. They are busing in people in those peak times where they can't get them on site and then at a year so there's 2 check in points for the traffic study. Fauske: And just to piggy back on that as well, what's come out of that too is, so there was some re -striping done on Audubon to accommodate a left turn lane and after opening I believe it was both Paisley Park and the City both agreed that the median should be extended to go past that northern entrance to prohibit, because there's still people wanting to turn into that northern entrance even though it's stripped not to do so. They currently have it coned off and are working with City staff to go ahead and get that median done yet this year. Aanenson: And one other point too, just kind of added anecdotally we anticipated the traffic coming off Highway 5. I think there was a lot of sentiment for that but actually the circulation works better for the buses, they're actually coming down Park Road and then heading north on Audubon so it's a right-in/right-out. It's actually a better turn movement. The sheriff's office actually made that decision when they were trying to get people to redirect and so also on site they've accommodated Uber and Lyft on site so they're now in their system so if they come in and drop somebody off so the sheriff's office gave 2 reports that they were not having problems up there so things have kind of, like I say they've got to the level that they think they can make it work successfully and are working through those issues so. Tietz: Can I ask Alyson a question? Aanenson: Yeah. Tietz: Alyson you know that internal road, that north/south, the link between the south entrance and the north parking lot. Fauske: Yes. Tietz: The one that failed. Fauske: Yes. Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 Tietz: You know it looks like it, I haven't been in there but it looks like it's about 10 feet wide. It looks like they just slammed that thing down on top of grass and really didn't construct it. Is that going to be dug out and reconstructed in the spring? Fauske: We anticipate that they will be making some improvements. The challenge that the, that Paisley Park faced at this time was that to trigger a watershed district permit. Tietz: Okay. Fauske: So to answer your question there certainly it's site improvements that they anticipated that they would need some more time for and so they were interested in trying to get a connection through there so that they could accomplish their goals to get those to the north and the south parking lots connected. And in the interest of time doing so and very narrow but they are aware that there's, it's failing. Tietz: Okay so they will fulfill the requirement in the spring time when they can properly construct it and go through the permitting process? Fauske: Yes and I believe they're also doing some parking lot improvements at that time as well. Aanenson: Right so how they've managed that is by limiting the number of people per tour so that's changed dramatically too. So they can get more on site parking and the rest will be by busing what they can't accommodate so ultimately they will provide those improvements in the future. So I think that will be, like I say they're working through. Tietz: I figured you know. Aanenson: Yeah. Tietz: A lot of things happened very quickly and they did what they could to fulfil their obligation so that's fine. Aanenson: Right, right, yep. So they're moving along so we are monitoring that and like Alyson said I think getting the improvements, the restricted median on Audubon should help too. So with that Chair and the rest of the commissions I was just going to go through our updated meeting. As of right now we do not have a project on for October 18`h. I know that Chairman Aller will also still be out of town. He is doing work for his firm in another state so he thought he might be gone that next meeting too so we do not have a meeting for November 15th. Right now we're looking at December Oh. The deadline for an application would be, this Friday. This Friday would be a deadline if we get something else. There's some things floating out there so we'll see if they land. Otherwise it may be a lot of code stuff mostly related to storm water, wetland and the like so we'll see if that comes to fruition. But as you can see with this big 30 Chanhassen Planning Commission — November 1, 2016 project we'll be meeting pretty regularly. There's also some other projects that are out there floating right now that they're going to do some expansion. I think we talked about those. Maybe, maybe not. One of them is the Bernard Group out on Dell Road. They're doing a pretty significant expansion and actually Vonguard moved a corporate office here off of Commerce. They're doing some internal remodeling and they too were trying to get under that watershed district. They're trying to find some, doing some minimal parking to stay out of the watershed district rules and then doing some parking spaces in close proximity but they'll come back through for site plan too so there's a few of those projects that are out there so we anticipate some, probably the first of the year. I do want to note at our first meeting in January is the day after New Year's so I'm, I tried to discourage people from that just because that means people the week before are trying to read their stuff and so we'll see if something comes in. Otherwise we'll try to avoid that and have that second meeting in January. Give everybody a little bit of a breather there so. So I'll let you know for that December meeting if something comes in I'll give you a heads up on that on Friday would be that deadline so you can make your holiday plans accordingly so with that that's all I had. Weick: We'll entertain a motion and we're done. Yusuf moved, Randall seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:50 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim 31